1
#12519
Blurb
You seem to have missed that blue-light special where they had kick-ass deals on logic and reason.
1/30/2006 12:37:11 AM
#12531
Luffy
Attention K-Mart shoppers: there is a special on shitty trolls in aisle 3.
1/30/2006 2:31:25 AM
#12534
CT
Damn... seems you got them the wrong way round...
1/30/2006 3:10:54 AM
#12540
Crosis
Today must be Opposites Day.
1/30/2006 3:31:50 AM
#12542
Darfasti
Just because you say it, doesn't make it true.
1/30/2006 3:35:45 AM
#12554
Julian
oh wait...
Surely he means:
detestable
falsified
and
[ludicrous] predictions.
1/30/2006 4:21:19 AM
#12557
Bum
ID has put forth no test. In fact, the only \"prediction\" it has made is a test for evolution: that there are systems of irreducible complexity. By the admission of the founder of modern ID, ID puts forth no other ideas that could even be remotely considered testable.
And also of note, the only examples of \"irreducibly complex\" systems provided have been shown to be reducible in nature.
1/30/2006 5:53:37 AM
#12565
AWP
The mirror broke.
1/30/2006 12:00:14 PM
#12570
storme
I hope he meant it to be the other way round...
1/30/2006 2:41:18 PM
#12576
David D.G.
Come on, people, there's no way this deserves a 1 rating, which is how I found it before my vote!
Yes, this guy has got things completely backwards. \"Ministry of Truth\" Award?
~David D.G.
1/30/2006 3:47:45 PM
#12588
rickyroma
Doubtless when he's not busy claiming evolution is unfalsifiable, he's busy claiming it has been falsified by irreducible complexity.
1/30/2006 4:59:52 PM
#12657
ssdexecutor
You took bad notes.
1/31/2006 3:56:02 AM
#332501
Darwin's Lil' Girl
It's obvious this guy made a common mistake. He wrote "ID" when he supposed to write "evolution". That's all it is...one would hope.
11/10/2007 8:45:36 PM
#337295
Laurel
Bizarro World has KMarts?
11/16/2007 12:27:30 PM
#337303
GigaGuess
HOW is ID Testable where ToE is not...even by microevolutions, it's still DISPROVING ID's perfect and unchanging stance of things!
11/16/2007 12:32:20 PM
#337304
Brian X
What predictions does ID make?
Evolutionary theory + continental drift brought us Tiktaalik. Does ID have any results to show like that?
11/16/2007 12:34:42 PM
#1364627
Quantum Mechanic
[citation needed]
1/8/2012 6:36:39 PM
#1364675
Azathoth's Puppy
"ID is testable"
What little bit of it might very well be testable. And it's failed.
"it is falsifiable"
Oh my yes. It's nothing but falsehoods. One right after the other.
"and it does make predictions"
Like? Goddidit isn't a prediction.
"On the other hand, as I noted...evolution seems to fail on all three counts, though"
Then pick up a fucking biology book once in a while and read it.
1/9/2012 12:15:31 AM
#1364681
Anon
>>On the other hand, as I noted...evolution seems to fail on all three counts, though.<<
I experienced a resistant staph infection once. Your Argument Is Invalid.
1/9/2012 12:51:12 AM
#1364738
You're right: there is no designer. ID is hereby falsified.
1/9/2012 6:53:10 AM
1