God is about science. When Peter said that Christian law must be studied until Christ dawn in our heart like the morning star. Morning star is 40 million times brighter and hotter than our sun. Also in Issiah outer space one side has countless galaxies while while other side has nothing. And outer space is blue as we see on day light which we cannot explain.
50 comments
While I actually agree with the first four words, having internalized the Catholic Church's actual attitude towards science in the Dark Ages, everything else?
Maybe you should start listening to God in that case. Moron.
EDIT: Also, if you say "bathing", go to the nearest sewer treatment plant. The initial vat is the general quality and healthiness of Roman baths, and Dark Agers actually discovered the concept of "cleaning your clothes makes you less sick". Frankly after realizing what the Dark Ages thought of when they thought "bath" makes their attitude perfectly understandable in my view. Ick.
Your grasp of science seems as feeble as your grasp of grammar and spelling, dearie.
Isn't the Morning Star one of the many names for the Devil?
Morning star is 40 million times brighter and hotter than our sun.
That is planet Venus, which also plays the role of the "evening star".
Also in Issiah outer space one side has countless galaxies while while other side has nothing.
There aren't any sides to outer space. The term just refers to the space beyond our solar system, outside of the heliosphere.
And outer space is blue as we see on day light which we cannot explain.
The color of the sky, as seen from a planet's surface, depends on the chemical ingredients of the said planet's atmosphere. On Mars, in complete contrast to Earth, the daytime sky appears red and dawn and dusk are blue.
Uh... outer space is black. Ever seen images of the moon's sky? It's black because of the lack of atmosphere. Even during lunar daytime (the parts experiencing daytime are lit up when it's in the sky, except during a new moon) the sky is black, and no stars except the sun are visible. Earth's blue sky? Thank the atmosphere for that. The sun's light appears blue because of it.
Morning star is 40 million times brighter and hotter than our sun. "
Morning star is the planet Venus dumbass.
"And outer space is blue as we see on day light which we cannot explain."
What science cannot explain is how you are able to find the 'on' button on your computer.
And yet, scientifically speaking, there is zero evidence supporting the existence of God.
We can't explain why outer space is blue because IT'S NOT, though we can explain why the sky appears blue.
Even my little brother knows that outer space is black.
Congratulations willma m, you're dumber than a preschooler.
Also in Issiah
Is that the same Isaiah that says we should all suck on Jerusalem's breasts? (Isaiah 66,10-11)
Since the fundamentalists take the Bible literally, I'd love to see them all running around Jerusalem looking for those breasts they're supposed to suck on.
I digress, but can the OP really be addressed in any serious manner?
Ground Control to willma m.,
I can't tell what God is about exactly, it might be or include science but you don't seem to know what science is or have learned any in school or you would know why the sky is blue during the day and that the morning star is a literary term for Venus which is not an astronomical star and is definitely not hotter than the Sun (although the term does refer to Jesus and not just Lucifer. Lucifer tried to be the morning star, by rivaling divinity/the Sun, but Jesus was because he was right under God as God's only son.)
I do not want a pickaxe in my heart, nor a halberd, nor a glaive, nor a pike.
And I certainly don't want a morning star in my heart.
FFS!
Pictured
image
Not a star.
The distinction between astronomical star and planet is arbitrary and a thing of modern nomenclature.
Are Saturn and Jupiter arbitrarily not referred to as Brown Dwarf stars?
See: Brown Dwarf Vs Gas Giant Planet.
The Bible simply mentions Sun Moon and Stars.
Given there is no reason to distinguish Brown Dwarf Star from Gas Giant Planet -
the bible seems to be the better informed document.
The Nebular Hypothesis is ridiculous.
The theory of Fuzzy Logic systems should really be applied to linguistics more broadly.
Only morons think 'I don't know' is the same as 'nobody can explain'.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering
@ Phillip-George(c)2013 - just passing
@Phillip-George
Theology is king of sciences.
Yes, just like Tiger Woods is the king of rugby.
Seriously though, Theology is a subcategory within philosophy, it has got nothing to do with the physical sciences, but don't let that minor detail stop you from trolling.
Dahhhhhh,
What you call science was once called natural philosophy.
If you bothered to do an epistemological study you'd find etymologically all words with the latin/greek suffix ology are knowledge bases/ data sets, and the word "science" itself simply relates to gnosis/ knowledge.
Theology is king of science..
say something original or give me one of your factoids to digest.
Somewhere An Astronomer Is Laughing . It is an ugly, hysterical kind of laughter.
@ Phillip-George(c)2013 - just passing:
Wikipedia entry on brown dwarfs :
"Brown dwarfs are substellar objects too low in mass to sustain hydrogen-1 fusion reactions in their cores, unlike main-sequence stars, which can. They occupy the mass range between the heaviest gas giants and the lightest stars, with an upper limit around 75[1] to 80 Jupiter masses (MJ). Brown dwarfs heavier than about 13 MJ are thought to fuse deuterium and those above ~65 MJ, fuse lithium as well.[2]
However, for some years now there has been debate concerning what criterion to use for defining the separation between a very-low-mass brown dwarf and a giant planet (~13 Jupiter masses).[3] One school of thought is based on formation, and another on interior physics.[3]"
So no, Jupiter and Saturn are far from being brown dwarfs, and nuclear fusion is required for a stellar object to be classified as a star. Easy, isn't it?
Phillip-George(c)2013 - just passing"
If you bothered to do an epistemological study you'd find etymologically all words with the latin/greek prefix theo are religion/gods/mythology.
Theology is the study of the imaginary.
IOW the knowledge of nothing.
dipsticks
nomenclature is largely arbitrary assignation;
and still you don't get it! QED.
dipstick (n) unaware contributor to an anti-fundie blog.
Well, madman, blue shift galaxies are an embarrassment to the standard model devotees.
And Sir Richard Branson has got a ride for you.http://www.virgingalactic.com/
You get the window seat.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
