random

Our liberal leaning mainstream media never hesitates to inform us that whites are slowly but surely becoming minorities within Western countries. Most of the time such trends are reported in a mildly enthusiastic manner, with naysayers depicted as paranoid and alarmist racists. I guess according to leftist logic, objecting to your group’s eventual extinction
renders you a horrible extremist.

However, another refrain that I’ve heard from many online leftists on blogs and elsewhere is that whites are already a global minority. Therefore, recent demographic changes are only natural. When reading through Studs Terkel’s book Race, one black woman that he interviewed emphatically rejected the term “minority” in favor of “people of color,” arguing that non-whites like her are the global majority.

Putting aside the foolish notion of a united “people of color” coalition and the fact that all groups are global minorities (as once pointed out by Jared Taylor), I’ll accept the argument that whites are a global minority at face value. After all, one cannot technically dispute such a claim. However, in the spirit of my post on the left and collective responsibility, I’m going to play the fun game of taking leftist logic and applying it to other groups. In this case, the intended target of my game are leftists themselves.
So how does this play out? While leftists love to gloat about how whites are either the true global minority or increasingly losing numbers in Western nations, the truth of the matter is that it is SJWs and cultural leftists who are the true global minority. In order to substantiate my claim, I’m going to analyze the attitudes and behaviors of the non-white global majority, with much emphasis on the heavily populated Asian nations that comprise much of this colored alliance.

I’ll begin with China, which has over one billion non-white people and is poised to challenge Western power in the years to come. Having taking courses on China during college, I learned that nationalism and intense patriotism are very much mainstream in China, and that regular Chinese have no patience for the agitation of minority groups such as Uighurs and Tibetans. Sure, minority groups receive certain benefits such as being able to have more children and a few affirmative action programs, but there’s no support for the kind of multiculturalism or radical leftism that bashes the Han majority or celebrates the impending demise of ethnic Chinese dominance. If one were to attack and demonize the Han Chinese in the same manner that SJW’s attack whites, he had better brace himself for a fight. China would also run afoul of leftist gender sensibilities, as their very own state feminist agency denounces unmarried “leftover women.” While women in China are able to acquire good careers and rise, they are also held to moral standards and society expects them to conform to some manner of traditional behavior. China, by and large, is very much a conservative society.

China’s fellow Asian giant and brown neighbor India exhibits similar tendencies. India’s Hindu majority certainly would not engage in the kind of self-flagellation endemic to white liberals, nor would they tolerate having their culture pathologized or deconstructed in SJW fashion. Their election of far-right nationalist Narendra Modi, who presided over a brutal pogrom against Muslims in 2002, indicates that they would do more than just employ the “tone argument” against those with the audacity to admonish them to “check their privilege.”

It also goes without saying that feminism of the Western variety doesn’t fly in India. India, like China, remains a conservative society with an unapologetic majority and a strong sense of tradition.

Lest one think that such chauvinism is merely confined to poor and dysfunctional third world countries, Japan likewise makes no effort to win any multicultural or feminist awards. Makoto Sakurai, the leader of an anti-foreigner hate group who wrote a blatantly racist anti-Korean book, was rewarded by having his book become a number one bestseller on Japan’s Amazon. While he may be extreme, the Japanese as a whole reject mass immigration and multiculturalism. Most Japanese likewise do not look kindly on liberals who bring up negative episodes of Japan’s history. With the blessing of Shinzo Abe’s popular government, the Japanese right is currently putting the squeeze on liberal media outlets. The Japanese are also not renowned for their embrace of feminism, outrage over certain sexist antics notwithstanding. Despite boasting one of the world’s most advanced economies, Japan nonetheless subscribes to fundamentally conservative values.
The aforementioned nations are just the tip of the iceberg. To be clear, this isn’t to say that these countries are cauldrons of hatred where minorities are pelted with rocks every time they leave the house. However, they are nonetheless unapologetically proud nationalist nations that defend their ethnic and religious majorities. Dota once told me that throughout the world, there are very few liberals. Rather, there are nationalists and moderates, with moderates upholding fundamental nationalist values (with the crude bigotry removed). Some might point to the popularity of socialists in Latin America, but even there socialist movements often take place within the context of racial nationalism, as demonstrated by Evo Morales and indigenous revivalism in Bolivia.

Indeed, it is only in the Anglosphere and Western European nations where suicidal liberalism and radical leftism flourish. The real reason why SJWs relentlessly demonize and attack white people is because they can. They know that they live in societies where their subversive views are not only tolerated, but encouraged. They know that white people as a whole won’t fight back. In fact, if they’re successful self-promoters like Tim Wise, they can even manage to enjoy lucrative speaking gigs at prominent universities and media outlets.

This knowledge ought to provide a measure of confidence to those of us in the alternative right. Far from being fringe extremists, we are the true global majority. In fact, we would be considered open-minded moderates by global standards, as most of the non-white planet regards our views as sensible and pragmatic. Subversive leftist deconstructionists are the real global minorities, and we should strive to remind everyone that our enemies represent true deviancy.

{Original text in Croatian; translation and explanations by me, Vman. The bolded parts in Košić's speech are ones that I considered especially WTF.}

THE SPEECH OF BISHOP KOŠIĆ
'Ustashism was not fascism, it was organized military action in the defense of Croatia as a country'

26th Oct 2017

The bishop of Sisak, Vlado Košić, gave a speech at the presentation of a book about Marko Perković Thompson* which was written by academician Josip Pečarić. Many media outlets have reported Košić's speech in which he made the claim that some people are forcibly trying to shut up both the singer and academician Pečarić. We relay Košić's speech in its entirety:

* {Vman's note: Thompson is a far-right singer notorious for his pro-Ustashe leanings. During World War II, the Ustashe were basically the Croatian equivalent of the Nazis. Anyway, here's Košić's speech:}

I wish we had more brave people such as the famed singer Marko Perković Thompson and academician Josip Pečarić.

Those who have no arguments would like to forcibly silence them: thus they ban famed singer Marko from having concerts, put forth criminal charges against him on count of public order disturbance, they defame his reputation and declare his work to be - outright fascist. Such people also use every means available against academician Pečarić just in order to silence him, they persecute his family, and - they most often ignore him.

However, both these great men - Croats and patriots - are people of whom our Homeland should be proud. Maybe in some future time, when we are freed of - as per the song of bishop Ante Ivas - all those traitors, perjurers, fraudsters, and also - as so poetically said by [far-right minor politician] Anto Kovačević - all the drpislavs {thieves}; only in a future, calmer history of Croatia will these great people of ours, Marko and Josip, be given their rightful place, a place of the utmost respect.

[...]

This book bears witness to the greatness of these two Croatian men, to honest men in dishonest times, to great men in times of small souls, to the audacity of the few who dare to be bold during times of betrayal. This is why their trail will be an inspiration to future generations, and in twenty or thirty years books will be written about them, films made and they will be an example of bravery in the struggle against the evil which is destroying the truth and our homeland.

[...]

Marko the singer and Josip the academician are being linked to the salute "Za dom spremni!".* It's interesting to note why this patriotic salute is being contested and by whom, and to note how the state reacts to it. Firstly, it ought to be said that this salute was spontaneously used during the Homeland War, and not only by the members of the Croatian Defense Forces (Hrvatske Obrambene Snage, HOS) who included it in their coat of arms, but also by the "Tigrovi" and the "Gromovi".** There are YouTube recordings of this. Interestingly enough, nobody was bothered by it at that time.

* {"Za dom spremni!" means "For home(land), ready!". This was the official Ustashe salute and is our equivalent of "Heil Hitler!"}
** {the Tigrovi (Tigers) and the Gromovi (Thunders) were respectively the 1st and 2nd Guards Brigade of the Croatian Army, and before it of its main predecessor force, the Croatian National Guard}

Likewise, nobody used to be bothered by the fact that Marko uttered that war cry in his first patriotic song, Bojna Čavoglave. The witch-hunt on both Marko and that salute began only two or three years ago, with everyone who used it being accused of ustashism and fascism. Firstly, it ought to be said that ustashism wasn't fascism, but rather an organized military action in the defense of Croatia as a country. Both Blessed Alojzije Stepinac and {Croatia's first president} dr Franjo Tuđman have spoken positively about the nature of the {WW2-era} state of Croatia. The Ustashe defended Croatia using all "permissible and impermissible means", which was a part of their oath.

That illegality, that is, those impermissible means are of course not acceptable to us as Christians. Neither are the crimes they had committed, and which the Church condemns, although it should be noted that they were an answer to the numerous Chetnik and Partisan crimes. But why did it, in recent years, come to the public political and police persecution of the "Za dom spremni!" salute and the people who use it - yet throughout the 25 years following the Homeland War this had not happened? Let's take a moment to remember the lawsuits against Joe Šimunić* initiated by the association 'Korak Ispred' from Rijeka, an association led by a Serb named Zoran Stevanović.

* {Joe Šimunić is a soccer player who landed into hot water when, during a game, he took a microphone and yelled four times "Za dom!", to which the audience responded with the second part of the salute ("Spremni!"). A video of the incident can be found here.}

Furthermore, let us remember that the Serbian politician Aleksandar Vulin repeatedly called out the current Croatia due to "ustashization and fascization". Other Serbian pro-Chetnik politicians did this as well. But it was actually the Croatian politicians who gave them cause for this when, led by the country's former President and then also the Prime Minister, they spoke of the "Ustashe viper" and accused Croats of "a turn towards ustashism". First they did this in the Jewish Knesset, then when the new government under the leadership of Tomislav Karamarko was being formed.

There was no evidence for any of this. On the other hand, there was more and more evidence that the governmental structures in Croatia still have plenty of UDBA* men and criminals - or their sons - who murdered many Croats, whether abroad, in Croatia or in Bosnia and Herzegovina. I too think that this loud witch-hunt for non-existent Ustashe was launched by the very people who were afraid of being subjected to lustration, which is increasingly being called for as a realistic and necessary option for Croatia's legislature.

* {UDBA is an acronym for the State Security Administration (Uprava državne bezbednosti), which was one of the names that was used for the state security service / secret police of socialist Yugoslavia.}

[...]

Anyway, I will openly say that the political demands of the representatives of the defeated Serb minority in Croatia, a minority which had - together with Serbia and the Yugoslav People's Army - initiated a rebellion against Croatia, are based upon myths and lies. They are now also supported by Serbia's official politics, because it is once again ruled by Chetniks. Unfortunately, they also have the support of the Serb Orthodox Church. These myths and lies include not only the interpretation of Jasenovac {as an Ustashe-run death camp for Serbs, Jews, Roma and political prisoners], but also the role of the Blessed Alojzije Stepinac, of the Srb Uprising which is actually a celebration of the massacre of Croats rather than of an antifascist revolution, then the statue in Banski Grabovac, as well as the fabrication of a non-existent camp for the killing of Serb children in Sisak.

[...]

Unfortunately our Croatian political scene is either powerless, or doesn't know how to answer all of these lies. A law should be passed which would state that all those who rebelled against the Republic of Croatia may not take part in any form of government; then, I think, it is necessary to request war reparations for the damage that the Republic of Serbia has caused to Croatia through its aggression, and this should be a prerequisite for any form of support for Serbia's entry into the European Union. Furthermore, it is necessary to remove the privilege for Serb children to learn a history of the Homeland War that is different than the historical truth; we should also forbid entry into Croatia to warmongers and those who spread lies - not only Serbian ministers and politicians, but also the representatives of the Serb Orthodox Church.

That is the only way a proud and victorious Croatia would act. It is the only way we could save that which we defended in the Homeland War, a war which must remain the only foundation* of modern-day Croatia. For this defense we should primarily thank the Croatian defenders, among whom we certainly include both Marko P. Thompson and academician J. Pečarić.

* {This is a very deliberate phrasing. He's implying that Croatia should give up claiming that anti-fascism as one of its foundations. By extension, he is also implying that the Ustashe movement should take its place. This subtext might not be obvious to someone who doesn't live in Croatia, but it is very clear to native people.}

Finally, I will reiterate one of the first things I said here: Oh, if only there were more people like Marko and Josip in Croatia!"