Quote# 95388

Oh, I have absolutely no doubt that homosexual activists will purposely seek out the most conservative churches they can find as a target. The activists know they already have those other denominations/churches in their clutches; they need to infiltrate and destroy the ones that actually are Bible-based and adhere to the Bible. They will just go around to all the churches that received the "warning" letter the most conservative churches received just prior to the 2012 election, warning them about politicking from the pulpit, and demand to be married there. They already know which churches these are, courtesy of the IRS and Barry Lind. When the church refuses, which my pastor has very strongly stated he would, then they will file a civil rights violation with the feds. Eric Holder, anyone?

It was never about love and marriage. It is about the destruction of Christianity.

Carrie Grace, Rapture Ready 63 Comments [7/8/2013 3:56:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 36
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 1514

In the end, budddyh, yes, if forced to, I will believe the Bible to be true no matter what happens. Why? Because I have nothing to lose by doing it, and everything to gain. On the opposite, non-believers have everything to lose, and nothing to gain, by not believing in it. And I do not say this with sarcasm or wittiness. I'm being serious. There may not be 100% evidence, and there's even evidence that appears to easily contradict it. I, however, choose to believe that the Lord will make it clear to me someday. If I get scoffed at or ridiculed for this, then so be it, but in the end, I'm mainly only worried about One specific person (or being).

fourgivn1, Rapture Ready 4 Comments [11/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 107718

I love this picture to the right. I believe that every young lady should learn cooking, piano and etiquette. Sadly, girls today are learn how to have sex in public grade school, learning the nightclub lifestyle from Walt Disney and being taught by the toxic music industry that life's all about dating, selfish pride and rebellion.

I have read many great articles by Christian men and women regarding the participation of women in the workforce, politics, and in the military. These are activities that most women didn’t participate in until fifty years ago. However, I feel there is one other major activity these writers have not addressed. For some reason, they've overlooked women’s participation in sports.

For quite a long time, women resisted the feminist call to play sports, since they just weren’t interested like men were. But this didn't sit well with the feminists; they felt this was the fault of male oppression. In the name of “equality,” feminist leaders poked and prodded and pushed women to join the games, until women in droves finally succumbed to the pressure. I think this should give us strong reason to pause and consider the question, “Should women participate in sports?”

Over the years I’ve noticed that Christian parents, as much as any parents, encourage their daughters to participate in sports. This is all the rage in our public schools, especially since the passage of Title IX by the feminists. Since most Christian parents send their children to the public schools, it doesn’t surprise many of us that Christians are influenced more by the secular school culture than by the culture of the Church. Worse, the Church itself is being more heavily influenced by the culture instead of the other way around. One of the trends in schools is the participation in sports by women; therefore it shouldn’t surprise us that so many Christian daughters today participate in sports. But is this really all that bad?

For those of us who believe we should train our daughters according to Titus 2, 1 Peter 3, and other Biblical passages, my answer is “Yes, it is not good.” I propose that sports greatly hinders the development of godly, Biblical, feminine character. Parents today expend extraordinary amounts of time and energy taking their daughters from one sports event to another, week after week, even to the point where it exhausts the family and family resources. The fruits we see are that today’s Christian women are often ill-prepared to be Biblically obedient wives and mothers. This brings to mind a couple of questions: “Why do we spend so much time preparing our daughters to play sports?" and "What does it prepare them for in the future?” My answer is that sports prepare women to be more like men. Instead of spending all that time preparing our daughters as the Bible directs, we are training them to be like men so they can better compete with men in traditionally masculine roles - i.e., compete with them in the workforce, in politics, in the military, and in sports.

Actually, I don’t have a problem with women playing recreational sports on an occasional basis, just with them playing competitive sports on a regular day-to-day basis. This rigorous physical and mental training tends to make women more masculine. I think it is prudent to often ask ourselves “Can a woman do this activity and retain a Biblically feminine character?” With sports I think it will be difficult in most cases. Even some of the traditionally more feminine sports like gymnastics and ice skating are now influencing women to be more masculine.


Most men I know admire a woman who is reasonably healthy and fit; they are also attracted to a woman who is somewhat “soft” and cuddly. This does not mean she should be delicate like tissue paper; no, a woman should be reasonably strong, and the normal duties of life will make her that way. This is what we learn from the Proverbs 31 woman. However, if you look at pictures of female athletes who play sports or observe them on the playing fields, you will notice that many develop strong, muscular bodies. Female athletes also sneer, wince, push, and fight just like the men. I notice these things all the time in pictures in our hometown newspaper. The sneers are most obvious; they make young women very unfeminine. The masculine uniforms and sweaty bodies aren’t very attractive, either.

I also notice when driving by our public school grounds and sports fields another phenomenon taking place: the young girls are trained in sports right along with the boys. To me, this can only be degrading to the boys. In some cases, girls regularly participate on boys' sports teams, and therefore compete against the boys themselves. During the past decade, more and more girls participated in wrestling; since there were no girls' wrestling teams, they joined the boys' teams and competed against the boys. I read about one school where the boys refused to wrestle the girls and forfeited their matches; there could be no greater embarrassment to them than to lose to a girl, not to mention it likely violated their sense of masculine chivalry. So not only is female sports participation degrading the feminine nature of women, in many cases it degrades the developing masculinity in boys.

At the recent summer Olympics in Greece, women’s wrestling was a new sport. There were several female wrestlers on the U.S. Olympic team; most of them received their training by wrestling with men in college, since there were no women’s teams. If you saw their pictures, they looked just like men smashing each other into the mats. Women’s handball was another sport that I’d never seen before, and the pictures I saw of the women fighting each other were sometimes grotesque. Similarly aggressive sports are women’s hockey, boxing, football, rugby, and others where oftentimes the women pretty much look and act like men. But even the less aggressive but more common sports like soccer, basketball, and softball tend to make women masculine and manly.

Some Christians might say that women should not compete in professional sports, but any other level is okay. However, professional athletes get their start somewhere. They begin in local school and community sports leagues like everyone else, and sometimes move on to college and adult leagues. Eventually, they may end up as semi-professionals or amateurs competing around the world in a variety of sports; but nonetheless, the masculinization process begins when they are young girls. The longer they play, the more likely it is that their femininity will be degraded.

Scott Jonas, Jesus is Savior 56 Comments [4/9/2015 3:29:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 1897

Getting any kind of Biblical advice from N.A.T [an atheist] is like asking Ray Charles to tell you about the mona lisa. It's like asking a deaf person to describe one of Beethoven's symphonies.

inverter, POD Warrior Forum 22 Comments [12/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 39016

I saw the first two Shrek movies (which I don't remember much about now) before I ever started thinking about movie plots as a Christian. But the other day someone loaned me Shrek the third. Marty and I sat down to watch it ready to relax and not even 15 minutes into the movie I was blown away. The movie is suppose to be a "family" movie but obviously cartoons with the "family" label are made with small children, or children of all ages as a target. I can't imagine setting a preschooler or an elementary schooler down and funneling this movie into their sweet minds (much less anyone else).

It was disappointing to see the characters making fun of prince charming right off the bat, as he was trying to act his part in the play. It was disappointing to see them laugh when the set fell apart, and disappointing to see him swear revenge.

I was really shocked to see hip and trendy alcoholic drinks mentioned twice and served once in the movie and really upset when they threw in a couple boys taking part in something even worse (I don't want to go into this particular irritant any further).

The movie is filled with name calling, rude manners, and plenty of other minor and petty moral filth. This was actually the under lying foundation of entertainment in the movie.

So in the spirit of Ephesians 5:11 "Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them"

What other movies out there should I be avoiding other than the golden compass?? What movies don't have a bad plot or bad examples as their foundation?

Kiana, Valley Church of CHRIST 50 Comments [5/10/2008 3:02:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 3807

Die hard envrionmentalists don't want to hear something like this. The brainwashing is so thorough that many today don't even question whether something is true or not = if it sounds or feels good then it must be true and right.

Blessedx4, Rapture Ready 3 Comments [8/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 119309


Britain First is about to launch a direct action campaign against Muslim elected officials, at all levels of politics.

Figures such as Sadiq Khan (mayor of London), Sajid Javid (cabinet minister), MOHAMMED Altaf-Khan (mayor of Oxford), Hussain Akhtar (mayor of Blackburn), Shafique Shah (mayor of Birmingham) and so on.

This campaign was prompted by the election of Islamic extremist Sadiq Khan as mayor of London.

Britain First leader Paul Golding said: “Britain First specialises in militant direct action and has tracked down and confronted numerous hate preachers and terrorists.”

“Britain First now considers all Muslim elected officials as “occupiers” and will start to oppose their strategy of entryism and take-over of our political system.”

“Our intelligence led operations will focus on all aspects of their day-to-day lives and official functions, including where they live, work, pray and so on.”

“Britain First has an official policy of banning Islam in the UK and will not stop until all Islamist occupiers are driven out of politics completely.”

“Stand by for a flurry of direct operations, similar to those we have launched numerous times against Islamists such as hate preacher Anjem Choudary.”

Britain First, Huffington Post 18 Comments [5/29/2016 3:34:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 99217

Nearly everyone who is unemployed votes “Democrat.” Nearly every immigrant, at least in the first generation, votes “Democrat.” Nearly every non-white American votes “Democrat.” The GOP know that so intellectually and financially bankrupt an administration should never have been re-elected – indeed, given the scale of electoral fraud practiced by the “Democrats,” he may not actually have been re-elected (always supposing that he had the constitutional right to hold the office of president in the first place).

Houston, we have a problem. America as we knew her and admired her is going down, sinking financially and politically under the tide of takers. For takers are also voters, and that is the problem. The taxpayees can vote themselves more and more and more of the taxpayers’ money.

Yet so little attention has been given to the death of democracy via the growing cost and reach of federal welfare programs that the word “taxpayees” has not existed until this moment. Google it and the search engine will assume you have made a spelling mistake. It will give you thousands of references to “taxpayers.”

The GOP can no longer ignore the state of disunion that exists because taxpayees now so greatly outnumber taxpayers. It will need a short-term strategy and a long-term strategy.

The short-term strategy is to confront the American people with the scale and intractability of the problem, and to recommend solutions with the aim of reducing the number and influence of taxpayees.

The takers need to be confronted, boldly but politely, more in sorrow than in anger, with the fact that the unbridled expansion of federal welfare cannot continue because the money has run out. Therefore, unless urgent steps are taken to cut the handouts substantially Uncle Sam will find himself in the bankruptcy court, and when that happens those taxpayees who would otherwise get something will very suddenly end up getting nothing.

First, the federal authorities need to know who is getting welfare benefits – everything from food stamps to Medicaid and Medicare. In the future, if you want a handout from Uncle Sam, you will need to prove to him who you are. If you are an illegal immigrant, sorry, but no more handouts. If you are a lawful immigrant, sorry, but no handouts in your first five years in the United States. Period. If you don’t like that, don’t come.

Very important: If you are claiming any handout, you are not entitled to vote. Taxpayers will have the right to vote, but taxpayees will not. That way, no one can vote himself a handout.

Lord Christopher Monckton, WND 33 Comments [2/7/2014 4:25:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 28
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 116080

A former UKIP chair has claimed that David Bowie was a gay member of the Nazi party who “dabbled” in the occult.

Julia Gasper was previously Chair of UKIP Oxford – and currently serves as a Parish Councillor for Risinghurst and Sandhills for the English Democrats Party.

The English Democrats have been in the news recently after candidate Winston McKenzie appeared on Celebrity Big Brother – and caused controversy with a claim that same-sex parenting is ‘child abuse’.

Dr Gasper, a staunch critic of the LGBT rights movement, hit out at late singer David Bowie in a tirade just a day after his death.

She claimed on her blog: “David Bowie was not the only famous queer Nazi, not by a long, long way.
“In fact there is a remarkable affinity between the two things. Many famous queers have been Nazis and vice versa.

“The Brixton skinhead Bowie is an example of something rather widespread and typical.”

She also raises Bowie’s lyrical references to mysticism, claiming he “dabbled in the occult” and referenced occultist Aleister Crowley.
Dr Gasper added: “Nazis in Germany had a similar fascination with occult, pagan and pseudo-mystic ideas that lent a veneer of intellectual respectability to their immoral doctrines.”

The politician last stood for the English Democrats in 2014’s European Elections, where the party managed to scrape just 0.76% of the vote in the region, winning just 17,771 votes.

She had previously called for PinkNews readers to be sectioned, called for Grindr to be banned, and claimed Daniel Radcliffe and a “queer mafia” were responsible for “victimising” former Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich into stepping down.

Dr Gasper also claimed that a “PinkNews mafia” caused the actor Rupert Everett to seek police protection. She wrote: “They [PinkNews] even bombard other homosexuals such as Rupert Everett with hate-mail and death-threats when he says anything against their agenda. He recently had to seek police protection because the PinkNews mafia had put him on its hit-list.”

Dr Gasper has also claimed that World AIDS Day “congratulates” people for “spreading this disease”, said she hoped “guilt” killed “queer gangsters” over same-sex marriage, and described PinkNews as a “vile rabid dog” of “homosexual bullies”.

The English Democrats leadership previously insisted that Gasper was “factually correct” to complain that there are too many gay MPs in Parliament.

Julia Gasper, Pink News 21 Comments [1/17/2016 3:43:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Bleep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 3038

have you ever read revelation...it is of things to come...that means they will happen. if you think that revelation is a fairy tale then you are sick

mjiracek, Christian Forums 10 Comments [5/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 98701

*This is a reply to a post saying: "The fact that creationism still exists as an entity, is a shame for the entire human race. Science is the future, but how can we get there when creationists drag us down. Let them teach all they want in their homes and at the pulpit, but not in our schools."*

What can we do about them? Nothing really. That same mentality was used by a certain group of people towards another less than a century ago, and before one of them thought to murder them, they thought, "The fact that Jews still exist as a race, is a shame for the human species. Nordics are the future, but how can we get there when Jews drag us down." Not suggesting that your implying that, but just referencing.

Lingang, NationStates 36 Comments [1/11/2014 5:12:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 39
Submitted By: RD
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 52501

I must admit, nevertheless, gays, lesbians and their antisocial, opportunistic protagonists are good at spreading lies and corrupt double talk. Same-sex adaptations have really nothing to to with what family and marriage are all about! They can parade and rally all they want, in the end truth is all that matters!

Gay and lesbian antisocial orientations are based on fake premise, irrelevant to existence of humanity! No single court, state or otherwise has a right to unilaterally define marriage and family. It will never fly, no matter how hard they try, or lie!

SmokinJoe, http://www.cbc.ca 32 Comments [11/17/2008 3:40:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Illuminatalie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 55771

no no no! an athiest can NOT be a good person for where did they get their values..from an aztec god who demanded human sacrifice..or a left wing nazi god who blamed the jews for every wrong,or a commie leader who demanded all concessions as in Yalta thus placing some 750million innocent christians in the tender hands of good ole Joe (thats whay FDR called him) hands and thus some 43 million were murdered! no..one who believes in only ones self cannot be deemed ..good...only like a bachelor who has no wife and children..what does he know about life anyway?..there is no goodness in a athiestic culture...cuba,china etc..please I am double parked and this is pure nonsense....only Jesus brought goodness into this stupid bleak cruel world....Let us all pray that this marxist anti-semitic muslim coming into the white house will live for his entire first term,,to prove once and for all that marxism is nonsense..just a gang exploiting people..let us pray that he lives and changes to see the light...signals are being sent that ..well...again please join me in prayer for this young man and for America..and of course for humanity..Nino

Nino, http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=296898&page=3 59 Comments [1/5/2009 2:52:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Spanky ZeHam
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 101116

"We gave you three days to recant but you insist on not returning to Islam. I sentence you to be hanged to death," the judge told the woman, AFP reports.

Amnesty International condemned the sentence, handed down by a judge in Khartoum, as "appalling and abhorrent".

Local media report the sentence would not be carried out for two years after she has given birth.

Sudan has a majority Muslim population, which is governed by Islamic law. It rules that apostasy - the abandonment of one's religious faith - is a crime.


The judge also sentenced the woman to 100 lashes after convicting her of adultery - because her marriage to a Christian man was not valid under Islamic law.


Amnesty International said the woman, Meriam Yehya Ibrahim Ishag, was raised as an Orthodox Christian, her mother's religion, because her father, a Muslim, was reportedly absent during her childhood.

In court, the judge addressed her by her Muslim name, Adraf Al-Hadi Mohammed Abdullah.


There were small groups of protesters outside the court - both her supporters and those who back the punishment.

[Bolding mine]

Unnamed Sudanese judge, BBC 31 Comments [5/22/2014 3:02:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 32
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 40458

However, the underlying reason many folk believe in Evolution is that they do not wish to be accountable to God (or 'a' God) for anything they do on this Earth.

CreationistDude, Topix 45 Comments [6/6/2008 1:48:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Fek'lhr
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 32650

The founding of the USA in 1976 was the first effort to unify Science and Religion and unify them in a nation under God. But, this godly effort of the founders of the USA began to fade away with the assassination of Abe Lincoln. The motive behind Lincoln’s death seems clear. Darwin’s 1859 theory of evolution is godless and, if promoted worldwide, could remove God from the USA. To expand this promotion, atheistic physicists created another godless theory known as the Big Bang theory. By the 1970s, most US scientists became atheists. But, these atheistic efforts are failing. I say they are failing because human freedom can be proven only if God exists and creates independence in everything in the universe.

George Shollenberger, Teachings: The First Scientific Proof of God 79 Comments [12/20/2007 12:29:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 82486

When a man says that a homosexual's advances are a compliment and not offensive he has already had sex with that homosexual. When a father says his homosexual son is acceptable, he has already been intimate with his son. When a woman says her daughter's lesbianism should be ignored, she has already sodomized her daughter. There is no middle ground! No matter how much some people don't want to feel ashamed of their children and admit that they are deranged, that is what they are. It cannot be accepted! Homosexual marriage is not permissible, public display of homosexuality is not permissible.

Gerald Polley, Voices From Spirit 136 Comments [7/9/2011 4:36:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 226
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 54284

God does not create a person with homosexual desires. The Bible tells us that a person becomes a homosexual because of sin (Romans 1:24-27), and ultimately because of their own choice. A person may be born with a greater susceptibility to homosexuality, just as people are born with a tendency to violence and other sins. That does not excuse the person choosing to sin by giving into their sinful desires. If a person is born with a greater susceptibility to anger / rage, does that make it right for them to give into those desires? Of course not! The same is true for homosexuality.

If so we should make it OK for all people to give into their "sin" with no consequences.

nhejl, Newsweek Blog 34 Comments [12/16/2008 11:48:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: CaseAgainstFaith
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 34913

Atheists contradict themselves. How come people who believe in God can just tell you that God is outside our view point? I mean, God could be 4d, and we cant see him, and thats how he travels and knows everything, and heals people etc, and we could never comprehend it. But you guys always state that you can't believe in God because there is no proof for him.

Dewitback, Dreamviews Forums 61 Comments [2/13/2008 5:26:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Moordryd
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 43162

You said that if you were God you would make an appearance, the God of the Bible made numerous appearances, do you now believe? No? Then that makes you a hypocrite. You said you'd make your holy book more accurate, a question about that, what part of the Bible is inaccurate? You said the four pillars thing, that means the social world as in society. Other parts of the Bible state that the physical world floats above nothingness. Other parts of the Bible speak about ocean trenches, which until modern times, have been impossible to find, now how could that be?

Spectersparten, Youtube Comments 20 Comments [7/20/2008 2:56:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Malkavian Jeff
WTF?! || meh