Quote# 70784

The very first human intercourse was a rape, women have a hymen. Every intercourse after that is still a "rape" because women still have hymens. Women are not supposed to be poked by men, they were all lesbians until one day a freak of nature was born and he got saddled with "God". All men are women first when they develop in the womb, they just have overgrown clits. Female ejaculation contains trace amounts of semen and that's how the ancient female reproductive system reproduced before men "raped" them.

In essence, all sex is rape. Am I going to complain? No, I have a gun to shoot down any "rapist" that enters my home.

Bricktop, AWE 124 Comments [2/19/2010 1:56:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 282
Submitted By: ixolite
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 130548

I was thinking about this today,It’s a self fulfilling prophesy,that the more developed the nation
the more feminism raises it’s ugly head,I think i need a holiday,somewhere where feminism
is restricted by economic uncertainty,it’s true first they came for the paedophiles,now it’s normal
male sexuality 13-14 year old’s.Keep up the good work.A lads holiday with plenty of cider,Vodca
and magaluf girls lol.

mr p , Resisting the coming 21st century holocaust – Men's Rights, Youth Rights, Sexual Rights 4 Comments [8/14/2017 3:00:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: anon
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127598

In Scandinavia, England and Germany, women have too many sexual partners. All women become whores. I want to change Europe. Want to implement standards closer to Islam with regard to sexual morality.

Anders Behring Breivik,  The Breivik Archive 11 Comments [5/29/2017 11:38:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: X
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126294

Happy international cunt’s day

In honor of international cunt’s day this week, I have decided I am going to write another honoring hero’s post. This week, our hero, who is one of the greatest hero’s to ever live IMHO, is George Sodini.

For those who do not recall, George Sodini was a 48 year old incel, who tried everything to find a woman, and got rejected each and every time. He even tried PUA and went to bootcamps, blowing his money to get his head filled with BS advice, which did not work. One day, George got tired of all the rejection and instead of suffering his fate of spending the rest of his life alone, he decided to go and do something about it. George Sodini got revenge by going on a rampage at a gym, shooting up a woman’s fitness class. The only mistake Sodini made, was not racking up a large enough body count. George was a fairly well to do man, having over $250,000 in cash stashed as well as outright owning his own home. Sodini should have used this money to buy some bigger guns, and perhaps, learned to make some bombs to really up the body count. Of course, in the aftermath, once the whining and crying settled, the media started slandering him and twisting his situation by saying he was only after 20 year old women and if he went after women his own age, he would have found somebody. Oh boy, doesn’t this sound familiar. I suggest you go back and read my post so titled. Anything to take all the blame off the poor wimminz. Any and all responsibility is kryptonite to today’s cunt, almost as much as the incel man is. George Sodini would have gotten rejected if he approached 20 year olds, 30 year olds, 40 year olds, 50 year olds. Maybe if he tried approaching 60 year old women, one would have given him a chance, but even that is doubtful. Bottom line is George Sodini had NO chance with ANY women, since he was introverted, quirky, and was not a badboy or thug. As if all this were not bad enough, to add injury to insult, he had to deal with the mockery from men as well as women of being a 48 year old, never married incel. I know from experience that in the part of the country George Sodini lived in, this alone would exclude you from just about all social gatherings, unless of course, you lie, but sooner or later the truth would come out. Why couldn’t just one girl have given him a chance? Oh, because that would be Ewwww, disgusting, now wouldn’t it cunts? Well, when they were cleaning the contents of your head off the floor, I am sure that some poor aftermath cleaning crew was saying the same thing about you. Well, cunts, enjoy your international women’s day. BTW your so called “strike” made absolutely no difference to the economy. You cunts are only good for one thing, and you know it o!o.

rantsofanincel, Rants Of An Incel 15 Comments [4/13/2017 9:54:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129986

[Part of a conversation on KotakuInAction about a quote from Sonic Boom, where Knuckles says that always making big deal about feminism whenever a woman accomplishes something undermines equality by making the act seem like an exception rather than the status quo, using soccer as an example. This started a debate on if this constitutes Knuckles being used as a vehicle for feminist propaganda or him being anti-feminist.]

Sickening, but I suppose it's pretty par for the course. People have been pushing their political agendas in cartoons for as long as I can remember. The cartoons I grew up with were always tokens 'r' us when it was human characters. Had to have the black one, the chick one, the wheelchair one, etc. Had to make them look good, too, so there'd be a dumb/aggressive white guy for them to correct/restrain. Then you had the ham-fisted moral/PSA at the end where you learn not to judge a book by its cover and why you shouldn't play with downed power lines, because knowing is half the battle.

It felt so much more benign when the propaganda was just Captain Planet and the morals were stuff like sharing is caring. Now it's going to be fucking wage gap myths and Tumblr genders. The kids never did anything to deserve this shit.

[...]

What Knuckles says may be accurate, but he shouldn't be saying it. Feminist proselytizing in a children's cartoon is despicable. You can argue that it's that mythical "good feminism" that stops at "men and women should be treated equally" since what he's saying isn't insane, but I would argue that "good feminism" wouldn't be proudly circlejerking about their propaganda on Twitter. Secondly feminism in that sense is essentially a meaningless term because almost everyone in the Western world is a feminist. It's like having a label for people who believe the earth is round. Aside from incels and maybe some weird NRx types no one believes or argues for the contrary position that women should not be treated equally except trolls looking to get a reaction. Even TRPers who conceptualize women as essentially slightly retarded children aren't looking to subjugate them or strip them of any of their rights, they just want to fuck the pretty ones and impress each other with their half-assed evopsych observational comedy.

If there were pushing BLM in a cartoon, would you be like "what, you don't think black lives matter?" if I objected?

ggthxnore, r/KotakuInAction 10 Comments [8/1/2017 12:30:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127455


When I was married, my ex-wife started staying out later and later playing pool. We would have fights when she came back, but I was still too blue pill to understand what was going on. No way she would cheat on me, she would leave me first if she wasn’t happy. Nope. But, I didn’t try to see what was going on, just shuffling forward in beta oblivion.

We left to visit family for the holidays. We drove halfway across the country to visit my family, then drove back to visit hers. We stopped at a hotel to rest for a couple hours and then see her family on Christmas Eve. I started trying initiate sex, when she straight up told me, “I don’t want to have sex with you.”

First time this had ever happened in the relationship. She’d never given me the headache excuse, the too tired excuse, nada.

And then all her behaviors clicked. So, my next response was, “It’s over. I’m done with this.”

I’m sure her family thought I was a total douche bag, especially because of how she spun stories and the fact
that we were still almost a thousand miles from home.

But, I knew the score, and she knew I knew the score.

kleyau, https://kleyau.wordpress.com/ 10 Comments [5/25/2017 9:47:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: X
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 128505

Rape is taking back power from females and stopping female entitlement

Even the option of prostitution is female entitlement. Incels that go to a prostitute are enablers. The most common way a female has power over a man is with their vagina. Females cling on to that power with everything they have. They are monopolizing sex. Females are monopolizing sex because deep down they know that they are objects and that they have no other advantages over men. Having a vagina is their default value. If you go to a prostitute you are engraving your subhuman ness. You say that no female would touch my genitals unless I pay her. You are accepting defeat. The females win if we go to a prostitute. They will successfully have power over you if you go to a prostitute. You will be a part of their monopoly they have on sex. This is why rape is such a big problem. The act of rape takes away their power. They feel powerless while being raped because they lose their power over lesser men if they get raped by lesser men. This is why rape is considered such a big crime. Females convinced the world that rape is such a big crime just to keep their power. They have convinced the world that rape is a crime just to be able to play out their sick monopoly they have on sex without repercussions. This sick monopoly they have on sex is the reason why we incels suffer. Men are being driven to prostitutes out of desperation that other females are responsible for. Prostitution is not an option for most of us because of that. Prostitution is accepting defeat and becoming part of their sick monopoly. Prostitution is giving power to females. Rape is taking power away from them. Females have the power in the sexual marketplace by default. They can try to go for chad. Men don’t have that kinda power if a 4/10 male would go for a 9/10 female she would say no and everybody would laugh at him. In the reverse case, chad is more likely to say yes. This is where the common incel belief that chad is taking away all girls come from. Every female has power over lesser man because of the double standard in dating and female entitlement. I want to eliminate that double standard. The legalization of rape would even the odds and end the sick female monopoly they have on sex.


Canino1997, R/incels 4 Comments [6/25/2017 11:14:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129683

(TheEngineer19)
I'm sick of sitting here doing nothing. I'm rotting while the women who taunt me and mock me are living brilliant lives. Well, not anymore. I'm going to abandon my LDAR and start making their lives miserable.

First I'm going to start checking women out in public, as there is nothing more offensive to women than an ugly guy checking them out. If I see a woman with a nice ass, I will stare at it longingly, and I will make sure to get caught, just so I can see the disgust on the slut's face. If I see a woman with nice tits, I will drool over them and I will make sure that she knows I like the sight. Because I am not a Chad, the women will be offended, and will feel bad for dressing like a slut.

The second thing I will do is to just try and engage in conversations with them. They will be completely and utterly offended by my subhuman presence, and will automatically call me out for being a "creep". They will then become "depressed" because I am not a Chad, and all they want is a Chad to come and talk to them.

It will be very easy for me to do all of this, because women are sluts who dress like whores you would pick up on a street corner. They also hate it when ugly guys speak to them, so I will be offending them massively.

(quirkyschoolgirl)
Hilarious when a subhuman actually takes normie advice of initiating contact with degen roasties they suddenly are against it. Normies are a confused bunch lol

(Greebey)
If a Chad did all those things he would be "flirting".

(TheEngineer19)
Exactly, that is why I am doing this. I'm not a Chad, so it will be the ultimate offence to them.

(imanacctingstudent)
This is a great idea. Women hate having to acknowledge the presence of ugly men. A great and legal way to inconvenience their days.

(emtick)
Normies are downvoting this - proof they're lying when they say we should be less shy and just talk to women.

TheEngineer19 and others, r/Incels 16 Comments [7/25/2017 7:27:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126250

(A radfem's critique of the TV series "Firefly")

Zoe...is meant to be our empowered, ass-kicking sidechick. Like all sidechicks she is objectified from the get go. Her husband, Wash, talking about how he likes to watch her bathe. Let me just say now that I have never personally known of a healthy relationship between a white man and a woman of colour...So you will forgive me for believing that the character, Wash, is a rapist and an abuser, particularly considering that he treats Zoe like an object and possession...Joss Whedon does not share my view, of course, and he paints the relationship between Zoe and Wash as a perfectly happy, healthy union.

Allecto, Livejournal 7 Comments [4/11/2017 10:28:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129464

[lyrics to "Put It In Bare"]

I never wear a fucking rubber
And I never will!
I won't let the bitch use a diaphragm
Or a birth control pill!

I'm not a faggot!
I've got balls!
If the bitch gets pregnant
I'll shove her down a flight of stairs
I put my dick in bare!

I'm not afraid of pregnancy
I'm not afraid of an STD
And I don't care if I get AIDS
I've got nothing to live for anyway

I'm not a faggot!
I'm not a coward!
If I get AIDS
I just don't fucking care!
I put my dick in bare!

I'll never wrap my dick in latex
Because I don't believe in safe sex
My only method of birth control
Is to stick my dick up a chick's asshole

I'm not a coward!
I'm not a faggot!
Procreate children with blue eyes and blonde hair
I put my dick in bare!

The Raunchous Brothers, Metal Archives 9 Comments [7/21/2017 2:25:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126673

Last November, voters in New Hampshire’s Lakes Region re-elected to the state house of representatives a man who appears to be one of the secret architects of the internet’s misogynistic “Manosphere.”

The homegrown son of a preacher, 31-year-old Robert Fisher is a Republican who represents New Hampshire’s Belknap County District 9. In addition to his legislative duties, Fisher owns a local computer-repair franchise, and in his spare time, seems to have created the web’s most popular online destination for pickup artistry and men’s rights activists, The Red Pill, according an investigation by the Daily Beast.

An investigation into Fisher’s online aliases found a trail of posts linking the lawmaker to the username Pk_atheist, the creator of The Red Pill—an online Reddit community of nearly 200,000 subscribers that promotes itself as a “discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.”
A post by Pk_atheist in the early days of the forum advertises the author’s blog, Dating American, a blog that immediately precipitated the establishment of The Red Pill in 2012 and which was “dedicated to the woes of dating in the American culture.” On the “about the author” section of Dating American, the author, who calls himself “Desmond,” promotes two other blogs he’s “authored”: Existential Vortex and Explain God. Performing a search of the unique URL for Existential Vortex led to a comment on an ex-Christian message board again advertising the blog, existentialvortex.blogspot.com. This post, written under the alias “Interested,” provided the keystone that connected Pk_atheist and Robert Fisher. First, the post revealed the user was the author of Existential Vortex (and thus, Dating American). Second, in the user’s bio, he stated his band—The Five Nines—had a new album out. Robert Fisher is the sole member of his band, The Five Nines.

Rep. Robert Fisher, Daily Beast 8 Comments [4/26/2017 12:12:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129218

Dude... these days like 11 or 12. I've seen some girls that are 12 in the face and 18+ in the body. Felt like the biggest fkn perv.

HMBb, BodyBuilding Forums 2 Comments [7/14/2017 5:12:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127470

When women start talking, it reminds me of a line from The Simpsons where Comic Book Guy says, "If I wanted to hear mindless droning, I'd befriend an air conditioner." And this is the point. All women do is mindlessly drone on and on. I have never met a man (from any walk of life) that has a genuine interest in what women have to say or how they feel.

99% of women are crazy. I would say you are stupid creatures but, the fact is that women are calculating, manipulative beings by nature. Yes, all of you, especially the innocent appearing ones. When it comes to relationships, this varies in degrees as I and every man has experienced this to be a fact, it is virtually a meme at this point. Aside from this fact, I can now say women are generally, not the brightest individuals (yes I expect some celebrity names to be mentioned) but that doesn't matter. Public appearances don't mean anything.

You are all not worthy of marriage or being invested in in any way. You have nothing to offer as women. In short you are all a waste. And this seems to be almost ALL the women I see. I don't hate you for it, that is just your reality. I'm not mad at you, just making it clear. I don't even waste words on a hot woman. I am not shy, or afraid, or none of that. Those women just tend to be the stupidest of the bunch and their droning is specifically annoying. These are the women that are rendered "good for one thing" but I don't promote this view as it contradicts my beliefs. This woman should be thrown to the curb first.


3bdushakur, Deviantart forums 4 Comments [5/25/2017 7:18:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 128099

Re: The psychological pain a manlet has to go though is worse than the psychological pain a rape victim goes though

yeh, it's fucking over if you're not six foot or taller
you are LITERALLY invisible towards women, and everyone gives you a smug look when walking past you because of your short stature
nobody will respect you and being confident will only make you look like a major fool
it's over man, it's NOT FUCKING FAAAAIR

(I'm 5'6" and have been sexually active since I was 15 and am in a wonderful relationship with the girl I love and who loves me back. Being shorts not that big of a deal.)

You're her supplemental income, there is no such thing as love for a 5'6 man, stop coping. She's banging a male model on the side

itsjustnotfairwhy & Looks-are-everything, r/Incels 14 Comments [6/13/2017 9:55:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 128985

["Girl Quotes Translated to English"]

"I should have been born in the 40's/20's/victorian/renaissance times"

I'm delusional with no concept of reality.


"I'm a foodie";

I'm entitled, vapid, soon to be overweight, and contribute nothing of value to society.


"I'm not looking for a hookup"

I've been pumped & dumped so many times. I just can't say no. 100% chance I will give it up on the first date.


"Just be yourself"

'Game'? Is that like...negging? No! Now go be a good boy, and mind your SMV.


"I like guys who can carry a conversation"

Have game. And don't expect an ounce of effort from me.


"I'm extremely well traveled"

I've seen dick of all shapes & sizes. When it comes to getting me drunk and boning, I prefer an accent.


"I'm not friends with girls"

I wish I was hot enough that women hated me because of my looks, but it's really just because of my personality.

Courage Reborn, Roosh V Forums 5 Comments [7/7/2017 9:43:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 125817

I’ve read that the police are using surveillance cameras that are powerful enough see through curtains to track men they suspect of viewing illegal porn. Fairly soon, surveillance drones will be so ubiquitous and tiny that the state will be able to have anyone under watch 24 hours a day, even in their own homes. Darpa have already made drones that appear to be insects such as flys. They could also be watching you through the webcam on your computer.

This might seem far-fetched in relation to stopping men masturbating, but the point I’m making is the tech will enable it soon, so it’s no more far fetched than the idea of masturbation being criminalized is.

Didn’t one of the Tea Party femiservative hags actually propose making masturbation illegal?

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 17 Comments [3/29/2017 1:42:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 88542

The fact of the matter is, even then, and also now, women are still more important reproductively than men. In this world, it is not quite as necessary due to the immense numbers of the human species, but nevertheless, women are still the more important half.

For instance, if humanity were to undergo… say… a transformation of the short-term solutions sort. It would be sensible for 1-10% of the global population to remain male. For behavioral studies, and for reproductive purposes – a good example to remember is that it would require only one man to populate a city, while it would require an entire city of women for the same task. Women are more important because they bear the child, and thusly, they are needed in greater numbers.

If my short-term solutions were implemented, and men and boys were castrated in great numbers, it would make sense for some men to be able to be signed up through governmentally operated programs to become “Breeders” who would be exempted from castration until they were too old to continue producing viable sperm.

They would be used for sample collection based on supply-and-demand. This, along with the use of scientifically generated progeny, would be able to sustain a perfect population. Primarily female, and sufficiently - to the extent that it is necessary for sample collection - male.

Likewise, mothers or close female guardians would be advised to exempt their male children from castration if it were necessary on the basis of supply-and-demand. They could still go through with it, but they would be advised to not do so until the male grew older.

This practice of castration, Breeder usage, and sample collection would continue until it was scientifically possible to create female children entirely from the organic material of female adults. Then, the existence of men would no longer be necessary at all. Long-term solution implementation would follow.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 54 Comments [7/26/2012 3:39:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 61
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129081

A roastie lies and tells an incel that he is good looking,

Her deceptive nature normies constantly are overlooking,

Her baseless platitudes are quite stale and need profuse cooking,

Yet they still wonder why so many incels take the noose and start hooking.

My_Post_Is_On_Topic, /r/incels 7 Comments [7/10/2017 2:11:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129379

However, it seems that this is a problem that goes beyond the formal business world, and has pervaded society in general to the extent that many – perhaps most – people think the government (i.e. taxpayers) should bear the costs of their life choices.

The example most in the news today is the demands for subsidized abortion and birth control that have become a feature of the presidential campaign. You’d think that our country’s women’s top priority is getting the government to subsidize their sexual choices, whatever they may be.

Following what I was getting at yesterday, sex has always incurred some expense. Like it or not, men pay for sex (or its results) in one way or another. Traditionally, you’d pay by getting married and taking the woman on as your responsibility, or you’d pay a fee for a one-off (prostitution). If you took it without paying for it, as in adultery, rape or fornication, it was a crime, or something like that. If we were honest with ourselves, we’d have to admit that it still is a quasi crime; as the old system has been replaced with something significantly more confusing, sex crime laws have become far broader in scope and can be applied to any number of situations (such as prostitution) that used to be considered beyond the purview of the law.

Additionally, despite false promises of free sex from the 60s and 70s, when feminists used to get support from men by promising we’d all be getting laid for free when we had “equality,” it turned out that sex still had a lot of associated costs. Pregnancy, of course, is one of the biggest. At first, we socialized that, but then welfare reform threw the costs entirely onto fathers (not mothers, mind you). Combined with welfare reform, we had VAWA, which significantly increased the costs of marriage and cohabitation by legally handicapping men in relationships with women. So great strides have been made in restoring a heavy cost to sex, but this hasn’t been enough, because women have grown accustomed to sexual license with whomsoever they please, and the men they generally like either a) don’t have the money, or b) are desirable enough to not have to pay.

Although the latter is a bit counterintuitive (wouldn’t women desire men who pay for them?), it’s a function of female sexual psychology. Women generally use sex to ensnare the man they want (and they typically have high expectations), and then they begin to draw resources from him. It works in simple societies where people hold each other to account, but in more cosmopolitan settings it breaks down for a couple reasons. First, there are more than enough women to go around, so it’s easy to drop one and pick up another, and secondly there are other means for women to gain resources, such as jobs and welfare, and as long as those resources exist men who have no trouble procuring sex see no reason to provide for women, even if they have the means. And who can blame them? Although it’s a social catastrophe, it’s a perfectly reasonable attitude from a personal perspective, because, after all, the individual man didn’t create this mess in the first place.

Here’s a scenario:

A handsome young investment banker making six figures can go out to a bar and take his pick. Let’s call him Mark. Mark picks up a young woman named Amanda, she goes home with him, they have sex, and he enters her number into his phone, leaving her only a promise to call again. Perhaps he intends to do so, and perhaps not. Whatever the case, he feels no guilt or responsibility, because the woman, who happens to be in law school, also has a job at a nonprofit, and makes more hourly than the average young man in their city, so he doesn’t need to provide her with anything. Additionally, if there’s an “accident” (but in all likelihood there won’t be, because Mark is careful about these things) there’s a Planned Parenthood down the street. Not only does it provide her with birth control, but it will treat STDs and abort unwanted children resulting from her nightly excursions.

Sounds fine, so what’s the problem?

The problem is that this young woman, despite being a student and having a job, is essentially on the dole. Her nonprofit is funded in large part by state and federal grants, as is her tuition. Her sexual care at Planned Parenthood is also funded largely by taxpayers. Her life, including her sex life, is paid for by the average working Joe, but she isn’t sleeping with Joe — oh no: she’s sleeping with Mark, a guy who easily could afford to feed, clothe and insure her, but who doesn’t have to because of Joe. Although it isn’t really his fault, Mark is a freeloader.

Joe, for his part, makes do with monthly trysts with a mid-level prostitute, which he can barely afford after taxes and child support. Joe, who is an HVAC repairman, is paying for all the Amandas in his state, his ex-wife Lisa, and his hooker, who is named Elena.

Interestingly enough, Joe and Amanda have met. Joe was called in to fix the AC in her nonprofit’s office on a sweltering summer day. Because the AC was broken and the atmosphere was stifling, Amanda had unbuttoned the top part of her blouse, and poor Joe couldn’t help but look at her breasts. Amanda was furious, and called his supervisor, who apologized profusely, and when Joe got back from the job he caught hell. Fortunately, he wasn’t fired, but it sure was humiliating. Not as bad as having to deal with his ex-wife’s lawyer, but close…

I suppose we could say “life’s unfair,” and that would be entirely true. But should we make it that unfair? Should we set things up so that Joe has to support Amanda as much as Mark?

According to our nation’s single women, the answer is a resounding “YES!” Married women, however, have a significantly different take on it, for obvious reasons.

I’m not sure single women are consciously aware of how selfish they are being. I think they fully intend to find some man to support them, and think the only way they can do that is to have unfettered sex with all the Marks of the world they can get their hands on in the hopes that one of them will some day give in and marry her. The problem is that it’s a trend that reinforces itself; the more Amandas we have giving it away for free the less likely any given Mark will be to actually support any of them. The competition will escalate, desirable men will become even more reluctant to give women any financial support, and the screeching for more entitlements for single women will grow louder and louder.

It is exactly this trend that has led to the bizarre, unprecedented fixation on women’s sexual entitlements in our current election cycle. When you socialize the costs of a private activity – and sex is about as private as it gets – you create an unnatural imbalance that rewards the few at the expense of the many. You also run the risk of inflating costs to unsustainable levels, and I think that’s something young women ought to think hard about. But they won’t.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 2 Comments [7/16/2017 11:34:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126763

Do you think that with an artificial womb, we can control how a baby develops, eliminating the existence of LGBT tendencies. No baby would be born gay or trans unless by design. You see, know how I said I wanted to manufacture genetically modified women and raise them to be ideal women to sell them as waifus?

Well, there's one problem... They have to be pure, unsullied by a man and free of romantic desires for a man in order to be sold as brand new...The man buying them will be the first man they love...As a result, all staff will be female to prevent possible sexual abuse and to keep girls from falling in love with their trainers...

But if we did that, how will they learn to be an affectionate partner from training alone? These are women who have gone their entire life without ever seeing a man outside a biology book.
My solution is to modify the all to be bi so they can learn love from one another...The girls will be assigned partners to mirror the relationships they'll eventually be in once they are sold to men.

Once they turn 18, they'll be separated from their girl partner and hopefully, they'll forget about her and use what they've learned on a male.

Besides, if they were totally straight, then we could only sell them to men.


whateverdude6833, Deviantart 9 Comments [4/29/2017 12:47:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh