Nice Guy™ In A Nutshell

Quote# 124146

Opening doors for women is a chivalrous activity that gives men an opportunity to check out and/or smack women's asses.

Article "Holding doors for women", Kings Wiki 24 Comments [2/1/2017 12:49:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 131828

Women are like children, they seem to only learn from doing dumbshit. If you tell them no, they catch attitude and rebel (feminists) and then they get fucked.

Sr Chalice, Youtube 2 Comments [9/20/2017 10:46:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129380

In all likelihood, the death toll will be in the thousands, but as grim as that sounds, it could have been far, far worse. Tragedies are still unfolding in Japan, but the people of the island nation are, for the most part, taking care of their own. American search and rescue teams are helping search for survivors, and US Navy helicopters are airlifting food to stranded Japanese civilians, but the bulk of the rescue effort is being undertaken by Japanese. Overwhelmingly, of course, Japanese men. And the women are not complaining. Even the feminists in the US are eerily silent on this score.

When you have a society in which men have a vested interest in protecting and taking care of the whole, and they are allowed to do so, they tend to do a good job. They display selflessness and their efforts are characterized by cooperation and teamwork; often by heroism as well. On the whole, everyone does better. There is no better example of this than the comparison between matriarchal Haiti’s and patriarchal Japan’s respective responses to natural disaster. Where in Haiti the women are still living in open encampments well over a year after the quake, Japanese women are already sheltered, which is necessary, because it is still cold in northern Japan this time of year. There is no doubt that some displaced Japanese will still be facing significant hardship a year from now, but despite Japan’s crowded land vanishingly few will be without a roof over their head, and none will go hungry.

As for the Japanese men, they have it far better than their Haitian counterparts as well. There are no foreign troops pointing guns at them and denying them food, they are taken care of and respected if old, and given jobs and a place in society if young. Perhaps most importantly, They are given the opportunity to do what men often do best — they are allowed to take care of their families and communities.

As we observe these events and their aftermath, they provide us with valuable lessons about nature of things, and give us an opportunity to ask ourselves what kind of a society we want to live in. Do we want, as the feminists would have it, to be helpless, disease infested, homeless and starving if we face hardship, or do we want to have the ability to come together and pull ourselves up from the rubble? For the sane people of the world, the choice is clear.

...

[Comments by the same fundie]

These things you list all derive exactly from the matriarchal nature of Haitian society. Or perhaps if Haitian women hadn’t been “oppressed” they would have built sound structures and prepared for emergencies — just like the Japanese, whose women surely are mainly responsible for Japan’s engineering, architecture and emergency response…

...

Matriarchal societies are characterized by the presence of a few dominant men at the top who command gangs of dispossessed, disaffected young men who grew up not knowing daddy.

...

[When you know less about Japanese metalworking than your average weeb but still pretend to be a history buff on the internet]

My take on the race thing:

Of course races are not all the same. But it wasn’t my intention to make an issue out of race in the article.

However, if you look at history, it’s pretty obvious that more patriarchal societies are the ones that became increasingly safe, orderly and technologically advanced. Was Japan advanced 2,000 years ago? Not really. It wasn’t until they adopted elements of Chinese philosophy (e.g. Confucianism) that Japan began to take on its modern characteristics. Before that it was matrifocal (good point Jack made) and characterized by tribal warfare the same as Africa or Haiti. So was Northern Europe, for that matter, before the Romans introduced civilization.

Sooo… Whether or not Haitian people could be immediately turned into Japanese is not the issue. The thing is, however, that by thrusting feminism on them nobody is doing them any favors at all. On the other hand, if given some workable patriarchal civilized set of rules, in time the place would improve instead of continuing along as a mess. I think Africa and African-derived societies are a great place to look at how patriarchal/matrifocal societies play out.

Patriarchal organization of society works on two different timeframes: the present and the future. It definitely makes improvements in the present, but the effects over generations can add up quite a bit as well. We have to keep in mind that the Japanese were living in the stone age just a little over 2,000 years ago — even the natives of the far-flung British Isles had been working metal for thousands of years by then.

Here’s a lecture describingthe transition of Japan from matrilinear/matrifocal society to strict patriarchy over the years, largely under the influence of foreign ideas such as Confucianism and Buddhism (yes, Buddhism is male-dominated like Abrahamic religions).

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 2 Comments [7/16/2017 11:35:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129266

(womenaredirt)
[HATE FUEL] did he try improving his personality?



(Full_Support)
"I got fit" == she used to be a 200lb landwhale and lost 15 pounds and now feels she has completely revolutionized herself and become a supermodel.
"I got promoted" == I slept with my manager and now I work as his personal assistant full-time rather than part-time
"There are dozens of men at my work that are better looking" == I thought it was personality that matters.
"drive better cars," == Materialistic whore
"stay in larger homes," == You mean LIVE in larger homes? If they're staying in someone's house, they probably don't own it.
"that have manifested interest in me." == Because you came onto them, as they want to cum onto you.
"I decided I deserve more and better" == You don't deserve anything, just admit you're a whore and want to Monkey-Branch into the arms of Chad.
Social climbing whore

(SaltyNugget01)
Lol "I deserve rich, attractive men" but I thought women value personality??

(xxxrivenmainxxx)
ofc, nothing screams "i got a good personality" than a large house+big car.
I mean, hitler had a good car for example. On the other hand, evil ghandi had no car.

(preldo)
Remember: we are not ENTITLED to gf. Only Stacy DESERVES a richer bf.

(retarded_dumbshit)
this is how a lot of women see marriage and relationships in general, not as a way for 2 people who love each other to stay together through thick and thin for the feelings they mutually feel, but as a transaction in which they have to get something out of. if something better comes along, bubye you're no longer good enough!

(Qazwsxedcrfv567899)
She would have to tell him when he is not handling knives or other dangerous hobbies. Reminder for landwhale hunters once u catch it you need to keep feeding her.

(AnxietyDuderino)
he probably didn't shower enough

(NeverUnfound)
A guy took her in and she had the opportunity to become a better person, hell, he probably encouraged it. In the end though, he could still step in a puddle of her and not get his feet wet. It's why you have to keep them below you, remind them of their place. Or all your hard work goes to someone who spent their time on themselves only.

various incels, r/Incels 7 Comments [7/14/2017 12:29:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129808

(multiperv)
From what I've seen of your great blog so far you never seem to advocate for or push the abandonment of the cuckold. I'm grateful for this, of course, but I'm guessing there are some women out there thinking "Unless you have kids or a lot of history or the beta is rich why not just 'upgrade' from the beta to the alpha and move on to great sex and a great life without him?" Could you perhaps please comment on the ongoing value of the beta?

(sfalphabull)
I’ve written about this in bits and pieces, so it’s worth consolidating it in one spot.
Women are sexually attracted to Alpha males because we have strongly masculine attributes: physical size, strength, and emotional stoicism. Women are quite happy to get fucked by an Alpha male, but biologically, they need someone to help provide when the baby is born. Even in the absence of conception, this is still a woman’s biological imperative: find the best genes to pair with her own for her offspring, and then find the best support available to raise those offspring.
The Alpha male has the best genes for the female’s offspring, but is not the best support available to care for the offspring. Why? Because the Alpha’s sperm is in high demand, he’s not interested in committing to one woman. He’s happy to fuck her regularly, but that’s the extent of his commitment.
This is where the beta male comes in. The beta’s place is loving emotional support, and to help the female raise children. Betas excel in support roles, but struggle in leadership roles.
Inviting an Alpha male into a marriage does not supplant the beta cuckold husband, but rather, it complements him. The woman has her sexual and emotional needs met, and that “work load” is shared by two men: Alpha and beta.
The woman will periodically feel emotional bonding to the Alpha male who fucks here. This is a byproduct of the oxytocin released in her brain after her orgasm. Alpha males are generally not interested in emotional bonding with women, so the woman may feel some rejection. As an Alpha Bull who understands this dynamic, I make an effort to redirect the woman’s emotional bonding to her husband, so that she appreciates his value.

(alphafucksbetabucks)
In a state of nature, humans satisfy unique roles that are most appropriate and relevant to them. When humans abide by natural hierarchy and recognize their place in social orders, they complement each other and everyone’s actions become purposeful.

some tumblrers, Tumblr.com 5 Comments [7/27/2017 10:45:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 135298

They try to say "I'm not like the other girls", when in reality they act exactly like each and every creature of their species. They are nothing more than subhuman creatures mentally.

shadowsoulz125, incels.me 4 Comments [12/19/2017 7:35:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 125927

As readers here are well aware, all feminists are really interested in is preventing male sexual access to young, good looking females, and in so doing, raising their own pitiful sexual market value. They will seize upon isolated cases of sexual murder to push through legislation that further restricts the free sex market, whilst encouraging the import of millions of Islamic rapefugees in order to produce a genuine rape culture, as well as inevitable growing Muslim political influence, that will lead to young women dressing conservatively and fearful to go out alone.

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 3 Comments [4/7/2017 7:15:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: xavier
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129413

A funny thing about female pyschologists

she has a chad bf, her chad bf was a bully in high school, she attends bully victims, she earns money and she is now traveling around the world with her chad bf

Torujo, /r/incels 7 Comments [7/17/2017 11:13:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 115308

What? You thought women are capable of love? When are you guys going to get it through your thick heads? These posts are starting to get on my damn nerves.

Isaiah4verse1, r/MGTOW 30 Comments [12/15/2015 3:17:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 141080

Anyone who tells you they hate incels because of "misogyny" is lying.

As a low-value male, people are disgusted by your very existence. Everything they do is an attempt to get you out of their mind.

Just look at ForeverAlone during its early days. Certainly a bluepilled sub by today's standards, but they were the punching bags of Reddit. No accusations of promoting violence, no quarantine, no shitty news articles blaming them all for a terrorist attack, but they were still insulted and considered an embarassment to Reddit anyway. People want you to shut up about your problems so they don't have to hear it, even if you aren't directly speaking to them.

And guess what happened when incels posted "rope threads"? You guessed it, a bunch of disingenuous normies who don't really give a shit about them, and would tell an incel to fuck off if he had ever approached them in real life. It lets the normie feel like he helped, thus allowing him to clear his conscience, but incels can see right through it after a lifetime of outright hostility.

People don't hate incels because of "misogyny". They hate incels because they remind people of the more uncomfortable truths of life- some people will just get screwed over because of factors they can't control, you can't guarantee getting anything you want just by trying over and over again. When confronted with a threat to the just world fallacy, they will do anything to try and get you to shut up and stop complaining.

And now that they have the long-sought-after opportunity to dismiss us all as evil rapist murderers, you can bet they're gonna take it.


21cell, r/Braincels 6 Comments [11/4/2018 11:43:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 133330

If I see a femoid getting involved in some kind of accident, only for the cunt to ask me to help her, I would deliberately ignore her and not feel bad about it at all. Or, if I encounter some bitch bleeding to death in an alleyway, I would not go my way to seek help and care for her in anyway. I mean, why should I? None of these cunts gave a fuck about me when I was bullied, rejected, mocked and shunned.

So, why should I waste my time helping and caring towards a species who wouldn't help me in anyway if I was in the same situation? Also, fuck the dipshits who guilt shame people telling how a decent human being would help a femoid in need, no matter what. I will not help or have any kind of empathy towards my oppressors who have done nothing but caused me pain through my entire life.

Lookismisreal, r/incels 6 Comments [10/22/2017 11:06:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 137301

Some of you are still bluepilled as fuck about women

There are so many of you who believe that there is nothing wrong with women, that the only thing causing you to be incel is the fact that women are just as visual and looks minded as men are. The reason you believe this is because you still have fantasies about looksmaxing one day and getting with your oneitis and living happily ever after.

The reality is that, yes, women care a lot about looks but they are also:
-Low in empathy
-Attracted to evil behavior
-Somehow conceited yet masochistic simultaneously
-Illogical
-Status obsessed
-Low in self awareness and sentience
-Selfish
-Cruel
-Almost identical copies of each other
-Hypergamous
-Lacking any concept of loyalty

I don't get why so many incels of all people are unwilling to accept the negative qualities associated with females. Come back to reality.

NegroKing, incels.me 13 Comments [3/16/2018 11:19:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 96191

Any honest woman who has been out in the field for a few years, would admit after a couple cocktails that she'd prefer be to be a traditional domestic servant cleaning the house and blowing her husband if he was an in shape,high status, alpha stud, pulling in big dollars and running everything else. The real problem is that equality is a lot of fucking work - turns out they don't like lifting heavy shit and working long hours - who would have thought? You can't have it both ways. Gender roles are "chivalry" when they benefit women and "sexism" when they don't.

Cody Stark , Return Of Kings 52 Comments [8/26/2013 3:23:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 67
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 135966

One of the points that I believe should be constantly repeated — both because it’s true and because it’s a strong “talking point” for our propaganda — is that all men, universally, find women who show signs of puberty to be sexually attractive.

Furthermore, I think that, having become pubescent, women enter the phase in their lives when their sexual allure is at its strongest. And one of the reasons many men today fail to realize it is because the media, in its “entertainment” branch, keeps showing us older women (women in their twenties and thirties) rather than teenagers. Because teenagers are rarely shown by the modern entertainment establishment as valid, legitimate ‘sex objects’, i.e.: “look at her, this teenage chick is very hot, you should find her attractive,” it can be said that we are actively being programmed to find older women attractive rather than younger women.

For the past several decades, teenagers have been consistently de-sexualized by the entertainment business, while women in their twenties and thirties are presented as “the” most appealing sexual entities. It is no surprise that teenage sex and teenage pregnancy are falling down rapidly. This de-sexualization campaign is happening all at once, coming from all directions: the schools, the political establishment, the entertainment business – everywhere you look, teenage sexuality is being suppressed.

There is nothing natural about this state of affairs. If you look at paintings from the 19th century and early 20th century, you can see that sexy teenagers had been depicted all over by the painters. I’d say that the artists preferred their works to show teenagers rather than older women. They realized the immense appeal of teenage beauty, and they certainly weren’t trying to “program” their audiences to mentally respond in certain ways contrary to their inborn nature, as the modern entertainers are doing, consciously or not.

I sound like a goofball when I write about “lizard brain versus mammal brain,” but this is a crucial concept, and Heartiste — a genius — recognizes it as such. Basically, there is an older part of our brains that controls our instincts, such as the FFF (Fight, Flight, Freeze), and yes – our sexual responses. This evolutionarily older brain doesn’t give a damn about ideology or some such; it is purely animalistic. And it ought to be said, again and again, that if you’re a heterosexual male, your lizard brain is telling you that teenage females are sexually attractive. It is universal, plain and simple.

This may or may not be in contrast to your mammalian brain, which controls social behavior. If you, a heterosexual male, are opposed to teenage sexuality, and wish to see it denied and eliminated, it is because your mammalian brain is telling you that this is how you should feel. Don’t get me wrong: the manmal brain, albeit new in terms of evolution, is mighty strong. It can actually convince you, firmly, that you don’t find teens sexy at all. (If you’re into HBD, that is Human Bio-Diversity, you can argue that among certain human races, there’s an especially strong disconnect between the lizard brain and the mammal brain)

This lizard brain (hindbrain) vs. mammalian brain (forebrain) notion is important, because it helps us understand why people act against their own nature. Simply put, they ignore those older parts of their brain telling them: “this female is fertile so you should impregnate her,” and instead listen to the newer parts of their brain, which may tell them: “you are a bad person if you’re attracted to teens.” And as I said, your mammalian brain can literally play a trick on you, using various emotions, to believe that you don’t find teenagers sexy, even though “deep inside” you do find them sexy.

The entertainment establishment is working non-stop to pit your mammal brain against your lizard brain, brainwashing you to think that only women above 16 or 18 or 20 or 25 are attractive. In your ‘guts’, you’re a hebephile/ephebophile just like me. This is the reality, like it or not.

As I write down my thoughts, I am 23 years old. And, being someone who is very aware of his own inner feelings, I can tell you this: the impression left on my mind by the horny chicks from my elementary school (around age 12) and from middle school (ages 12 to 15) is the strongest of all. Yes, I find women in their late teens or early tweens attractive. Of course. Yet, in my fantasies, I often encounter those lustful teenagers from the past, girls that were either sexually active back then, or at the very least exhibited clear signs of being very horny. A whole decade has passed since then, yet I still see those exact slutty girls in my imagination.

My mind is strong enough to resist media brainwashing; my lizard brain is fierce; and my memory is well-functioning. All these factors combined make it so that the impressions I had from those teenage sluts may never vanish. I sometimes imagine a parallel reality, in which I was married at the age of 12, to a girl of the same age, and grown up having sex with her the whole time. In my case, that shall forever be but a figment of my imagination; but I wish that one day, such things will again become normal. Maybe under a new world order, maybe under Islam – I don’t know.

And as I keep saying, imagination is still legal.

dailyantifeminist, Anti-Feminist Blog 9 Comments [1/15/2018 2:40:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 130348

In fact, women occupy the second of three social classes of humanity that God designed.

The Three Social Classes Ordained by God

Contrary to modern Western and American ideals about equality God’s original design of mankind features a social order with three classes of people.

God’s First-Class Citizen – Man as God’s Image Bearer

“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” Genesis 1:27 (KJV)

There are a great number of Christian theologians that misread this famous Biblical account of the creation of man and woman. This passage does NOT teach that God created “them” (male and female) in his image. It clearly states “in the image of God created he HIM”. Many Christian teachers (even non-feminist teachers) have tried to argue that because “man” can refer to mankind that this can mean “So God created mankind in his own image”. That is absolutely true that sometimes “man” (or Adam as it is in the original Hebrew) can refer to an individual man or mankind in general. The problem with this interpretation in this particular passage is found in the second phrase with the word “him” which is a translation of the Hebrew phrase “eth haa-‘adam” which literally means “this same man”.

So in Genesis 1:27 the Scriptures are telling us “God created Adam in his own image, in the image of God created he this same Adam. Male and Female created he them.”

This passage tells us two very important truths. God created man (male human beings) in his image and also that he created women as well. It does not say he created women in his image, only that he created women.

And if there was any doubt as to the correct interpretation of this passage God gave the Apostle Paul this divine commentary on Genesis account:

“For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.” I Corinthians 11:7 (KJV)

God’s Second-Class Citizen – Woman the helper to man

“And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.” – Genesis 2:18 (KJV)

In Genesis chapter 2 we see that God did not want Adam to be alone and so he created a helper for him. Now a helper can be one in authority (like a manager who helps his workers), a helper can be an equal partner or a helper can be a subordinate. So which kind of helper did not create Eve to be? The Genesis account tells us that Adam named her type “woman” and later he even gave her personal name which was Eve. This was a sign that she would be a subordinate helper, not an authority helper nor an equal partner. Throughout the Old Testament this is maintained when we see that men ruled over women and that husbands could override any decision of their wives and fathers could override any decision of their daughters (Numbers 30).

Multiple New Testament passages confirm that woman was designed by God to be a subordinate helper to man.

“Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives; 2 While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear.” I Peter 3:1-2 (KJV)

“22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. 24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.” Ephesians 5:22-24 (KJV)

God designed woman to be man’s subordinate helper in many ways. She helps him by bearing and caring for his home and his children (1 Timothy 5:14). She helps him by being a faithful companion (Proverbs 31:11, Malachi 2:14). She helps him by bringing him sexual pleasure (Proverbs 5:15-19). But another way she helps her husband is simply by being “the weaker vessel” (1 Timothy 5:14) and needing his leadership, provision and protection. A man cannot fully image God as he was designed to do without being a husband and father and woman helps him in this way to fulfill image God to his fullest capability.

So, if you are asking “Why did God make women to be second class citizens?” the answer is found in a passage we just stated above:

“For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.” Ephesians 5:23 (KJV)

Not only was man made to image God and thus bring glory to him but marriage between a man and woman was made by God to model the relationship between God and his people. So, by fully embracing their status as second-class citizens to men women help men to fully image God and also model the relationship between God and his people.

To our equality obsessed world this makes no sense but this is why we as Christians are called to honor women for being the second-class citizens God designed them to be (I Peter 3:7).

Let me put this another way. God could have made a partner for man that was his equal in every way. In fact, God could have created man as a hermaphrodite (with both sexes) and then humans could have just chosen any other human as partners. They could have equally broken up the division of having children, caring for the home, leading, providing and protecting. If what I just said sounds familiar it is because this is exactly what our culture does today. We promote homosexuality and gender equality – both ideologies which are in direct contradiction to God’s Word and his design.

But if humans existed in pair bonded relationships as equals this would not have properly modeled the relationship of God to his people. Only if there were two genders with one dependent on the other for their leadership, provision and protection could the relationship of God to his people be properly modeled.

Biblegenderroles, Bible Gender Roles 8 Comments [8/9/2017 1:52:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 140816

Literally everything to do with having a victim complex and dragging men down off their pedestals and defeating the patriarchy. Like it's a fucking war now, except even the WOMEN don't envision themselves as strong enough to conquer the evils of masculinity. So literally you've NOT been oppressed, you've just realised you're shitter in a lot of ways than men so men need to behave less awesomely to compensate for your shitness. I say this as a 34 year old woman; FUCK feminism as it manifests today. I've literally contemplated suicide to get off this earth because nothing makes sense anymore.

Please don't quit this game yet. The earth needs smart people like you.


Nobody listens though. I've been called a 'traitor to my gender' for merely pointing out that false sexual assault claims by women DO happen. Just that is enough to cast me as either plain evil or just not 'smart enough' to realise all the ways my life has been inhibited by men; despite over three decades of personal experience to the contrary.

You can't reason with that level of vitriolic fanaticism.

I thought that was third wave, where’s the distinction


3rd wave = equality feminism, still irritating with the conflation of equal opportunity with equal outcome but still, generally geared towards positive social outcome for all, LGBT equality and acceptance, women should have the chance to earn the same income and status as any man

4th wave = JUSTICE feminism - FUCK MEN, MEN ARE TRASH, women deserve REPARATIONS above and beyond equality as punitive damages for all the horrid things men have done. The patriarchy must be crushed, men have NO inherent societal value or place beyond that of oppressors. The time of WOMEN has arrived.

LOL what? Women never envisioned themselves like that. They envisioned being "empowered." This is a code word meaning "I want other people to do yucky things for me exactly like before, but I'll pretend that they aren't men. We'll just take male taxpayer dollars instead of our husbands' dollars to subsidize our shitty career choices and also make up a zillion rules so that things in yucky penisy workland are less penisy and our feelings don't get hurt."


So you agree with me...?

I don't think 2nd wavers or women in general were ever "oppressed." There was just real social change back then. So yeah, I agree in that it's mostly just amped up man-hate now. They want the whole world to be vagina-friendly. Everywhere. But the victimhood thing was always there. The difference is that the modern snowflakes are angry that DESPITE the excessive feminization of the workplace (huge HR bureaucracy, parallel justice systems) earning money or accomplishing anything worthwhile outside of the home STILL requires being "masculine." The 2nd wavers were grateful just for the chance to act more masculine occasionally without becoming social outcasts. There were still wars. Crime rates were high. Cars had no power steering or brakes, and broke down often. Cell phones did not exist. A nuclear holocaust could break out at any moment. The world was a more dangerous place. They had a certain respect for masculinity and how it deals with the real physical world.


Agreed. That's really what saddens me now; if anything I see a world that needs more strong, honest, guiding male influence, especially within the younger generations. Instead this hyper feminised shit is ruining society and morality.

PhoebeDodgedShelby, r/MensRights 4 Comments [10/7/2018 6:33:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127934

If women tempt you, just try thinking like a seven-year-old. Maybe dress and talk like one too.

Tell yourself that girls are icky and have cooties. Maybe try singing "No dick, no dick, na na na na na!" in the style of a playground chant. (Just don't do it too loudly).

Schoolboys instinctively know how to go their own way. It's only later that they end up getting force-fed the blue pill.

TakeYerPills, /r/MGTOW 14 Comments [6/8/2017 1:29:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 131002

(In a thread titled "What is something you think members of the opposite sex spend too much time unjustifiably whining about?")

A non-existent wage gap. Baby, the only gap you've got is the only reason men speak to you.

Anonymous, Reddit 2 Comments [8/28/2017 9:40:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 118462

This is the brief story of my second gf and her silly, irrational actions. Bear in mind, she is likely my best female friend today.

1.I meet her on a dating site. She just broke up with her boyfriend. I'm still a virgin at the time and she's very uninterested in meeting, wasting our time in fruitless bs talks about nothing.
2.I lose my virginity with some slut and tell this to her. She
a) immediately goes back to her ex AND b)immediately wants a meeting with me
3.We meet and she wants me, not her bf
4.She breaks up with her bf and says she wants to be with me
5.She meets me the second time after this. But now I'm no longer interesting to her. Now she blocks me on Fb.
6.She wants to get back to her "bf", he doesn't want her back.
7.Three months pass. She contacts me again, asking me to solve some fucking problem of hers. I decline and block her on Facebook. She then sends me an SMS, offering sex.
8.She tries to torture me by making up excuses to "give up" on sex and then offering it again ( she later, when we were already in a relationship, admitted these were all fake "changes of mind").
9.I finally snap and post her pic on my blog. She then finally agrees to really have sex with me - under the condition that I no longer contact her.
10.We have sex and I no longer contact her. But she contacts me. (EDIT - some of the insaner manginas online used to claim she did so because she was afraid I'd "blackmail" her again. However, that's just insanity by manginas, since when we stopped contacting I had no more pics of her. When she contacted me again I was BACK ON HER FRIEND LIST AND COULD SEE ALL HER PICS AGAIN). So we start a relationship.
11.Our relationship is a joke and she is a crazy woman.
12.We finally, after about a month and a half, see it's not working and break it off.
13.She briefly goes back to her previous "bf" who fucks her once but then dumps him as well.
14.After some months of me doing other stuff we get back in contact and are friends now. She's a lesbian now. She destroys her relationship with some woman.
Still, in summer of 2014 she start dating one of my best friends but dumps him after a week or two, before they even had sex, because she now finally decided to be a full lesbian.
15.In early 2015 she has such a fight with her schizophrenic mother that she has to come to my place, which I don't want to allow her without fucking me. She does and is angry about it for some time, making a fuss over nothing, but eventually we go on being friends like nothing happened. After all, by that time connections are too strong and we share even some financial interests, along with co-operation in various areas. We depend on each other too much in any case. This helps mend any conflicts but the fact is also that we're by now used to each other and share some common traits - it's not like hate each other but have to tolerate each other. I like her as a person and we share a history.

Lessons:

modern Western women are completely insane. It's a waste of time to try and find logic in the actions. What they do is often as random as throwing a dice. So don't expect anything, especially anything good.

actual full lesbians don't exist

women in general base their appreciation of a man on how successful he is in attracting other women - how this is achieved and his objective qualities are irrelevant. You can be a smelly rapist with an IQ of 70, she will like you more than a virgin with an IQ of 170.

consent is a nonsensical concept in modern society. It's a word that is used to protect female chastity and husband's property, not ignoring the whims of some slut. Modern Western women will hate you if you think about consent. You need to show you have a spine and fuck them regardless of their stupid whims, or they won't respect you.

Relationships in the modern Western world are a joke. Your "gf's" or "wife's" pussy is everybody else's as well as "yours" - and laws are made that way too. There is basically nothing a husband or a boyfriend can do about a cheating wife and pathetic cucks will always protect these sluts. So have no qualms about fucking other men's wives or girlfriends in the West - if you won't somebody else will. Besides, the guy they claim to be with is doing the same to other men's "gf's" and "wives". Expect absolutely no fidelity of any "gf" you will have in a feminist culture - it's like expecting a cat to not eat that steak when you leave the cat with it in a room to go grocery shopping. Fidelity is achieved in a sane patriarchal culture by marrying women off as virgins, making being a slut an undesirable trait and not allowing any feminist laws. In the Western culture your "gf's" or "wives" pussy is E-V-E-R-Y-B-O-D-Y'S and she is not fit to be a caring wife and a mother. You will be raising some retard's children, not your own.

caamib, r/Truecels 48 Comments [4/25/2016 3:20:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 134012

Of course. MtTs suck all the oxygen out of the planet where women are concerned. Typical males.

eternallyfemale, r/GenderCritical 4 Comments [11/9/2017 5:18:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh