Quote# 120554

Just speaking from my own experience here. I dont believe in platonic relationships. Unless the guy is gay or impotent. No just impotent, because gay guys would still do it. LOL..

My ex had a lot more guy friends than girl friends. Also her "best friend" was a guy, she told me this in the beginning. I trusted her but in the back of my mind was still a bit leery.

For good reason. She slept with her best friend and another friend. Who knows how long they have been sleeping together, but I was not there to find out. I was gone real fast.

Bottom line a guy will always want to fuck his girl friends, he's hoping to be that shoulder to lean on. Or just hang out get drunk and have casual sex as if its nothing.

onedaily, isitnormal.com 11 Comments [7/17/2016 6:56:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 130925

(commenting on "The fact that there's no female incel community and this sub is 99% male, just shows how pathetic subhuman male existence is.")

Weren't there a few women posters who tried to post here, but you guys chased them away?

After we spoke to them, they realized they had been rejecting men and not going for men of their own leagues. Women all date way above their leagues and only find those guys attractive and those guys will have sex with them but won't commit but the women won't go for men less attractive than those guys that do want to have relationships with them. There are no female incels, they are just too picky and shallow like the all other women.

choosebaseoftwo, /r/incels 4 Comments [8/24/2017 8:27:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 136519

[Note: the post name says "Welmer" but the blue background indicates it's by OP, who is denoted as W. F. Price]

People havem’t really changed much in their nature since the very beginning. Many of these terms like ‘witch” “posessed by the devil” etc were just another way of saying what we would have a modern term for.

True. And despite the standardization of terminology, most people today are just as ignorant about mental/physical health as they ever were. Community leaders back then – the intelligent, literate sorts – knew a lot more than people credit to them.

Many of these witches were old hags living on the outskirts of villages who collected poisonous plants. They would supply females with drugs to induce abortions or to poison their husbands or kids.

Sounds accurate to me. I think in a lot of cases calling one of these hags a “witch” may have been the most convenient way to eliminate a truly malignant influence from the community. In Scandinavia, female holdouts who still practiced sorcery in the Christian era, known as Völvas, exerted some influence on women for quite some time. They would sell them potions to entrap men, have their way, etc. Some of them, created from concoctions of potent psychoactive drugs, actually work. These potions show up in stories like Tristan and Iseult and the Völsunga saga.

A lot of the folk wisdom about witches comes directly from these women, who probably were still operating home businesses of sorts until the witch purges of the 15th-17th centuries.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 2 Comments [2/8/2018 6:41:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 131202

Ridiculous! How mangina and pathetic is this sick culture! I am MORE angry with MEN than women. They are ALL scum for accepting this.

“This is the most horrific thing in the world to be accused of and I believe anyone guilty of something like this should be strung up.”

Oh, then just about every man in the past in this country (England/Britain/Uk for American readers ) prior to the past few decades. Even as recently as 1990ish men were buying girls that age drinks in the local pubs when they used to hang around the bars. I actually remember in the early 2000s being with my fourteen year old girlfriend ( I was sixteen, so a paedophile by post-savile ukay standards ) and seeing her friends loitering around the pub, waiting to have drinks bought for them.

And yet SCUM like STEPHEN FRY can go around making a documentary about the poor treatment of ‘gay’ people in darkie countries: WHAT ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST HAPPENING THE UNITED STATES OR HERE?



TheMisandristOrderOfPuritanScum , Resisting the coming 21st century holocaust – Men's Rights, Youth Rights, Sexual Rights 8 Comments [9/3/2017 9:47:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: anon
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 131922

This is not going to turn into a game blog. Other men are much better at game than I am. I know, because I have seen them in action. On the other hand, I am not just an average f#@#!g chump. I clearly score more than the average f#@#!g chump, and fat and in my sixties I still score more than the average f#@#!g chump, though back when I was very fat, not so much.

I know a man half my age who was a male model and is a lot richer than I am. Girls stop and turn their heads when he walks through the mall. If he stands still, cute girls appear from nowhere and start conversations with him. But then nothing happens. Money and looks gets your foot in the door, but it does not get you laid. His problem is that he is far too nice.

Now a lot of readers of this blog seem to believe that nice, upper class girls, the girls that come from intact families, go to good universities and have supportive upper class fathers are not like that. Being a nice guy will, they think, get you a nice girl.


The girl who started fucking at nine years old, jumped aboard more cocks than merry go round rides, mostly the cocks of criminals, and is still unmarried at thirty five because she is incapable of bonding with any man, is the girl who whose doting intact family spent a shitload of money getting her a good law degree from a good university. And this is precisely what evolutionary theory predicts. It is precisely the girl with the good family and a loving father who is disinclined to have sex with the nice guy. Nice guys have a way better shot with girls whose fathers have died or abandoned them. I have tried nice, and I have tried being an asshole, and nice gets mostly gold diggers and a few fatherless girls.

If you want a nice girl, be the bad man. The only society where nice guys get the girl is the society where the patriarch does not allow any non related males near his daughter except the man he has already decided will marry her. (And in such a society she will agree to marry him, because she wants to climb aboard the first plausibly high status cock that she meets, and her Dad treats him as high status and forces her to treat him as high status.) Ballroom dancing is pretty much a ritual to make the males look high status to the girls, so back in the day the system was a girl had a dance card filled out by her father, and was compelled to dance with everyone on the dance card, and be polite and respectful to him, and forbidden to dance with anyone not on the dance card.

But in a society where you can meet chicks without asking their dad to put you on their ballroom dance card, you need to treat chicks like dirt. And you especially need to treat them like trash if you want chicks from intact families who don’t have a number larger than your own.

One of my commenters told me that if I was dating much younger women, I was dating gold diggers. Yes, I have dated gold diggers, lots of gold diggers. But the trouble with gold diggers is that they want the gold, they don’t want to lay me. If I want to lay women, I get far better luck not giving them any gold, at least not until they have been having sex with me for a while without any indication of fidelity or financial support. I would be happy to date gold diggers if I got laid that way, but I don’t get laid that way – OK, I did get laid by one gold digger, but it was part of a plot to commit paternity fraud. Beta provider game just does not work. I know, because I have tried it extensively. You need a little bit of beta provider game, but it has to be part of asshole game, and you don’t turn on the beta provider game until after asshole game has succeeded. The chick needs to think that by laying you, serving you, and obeying you, then she reveals the soft nice guy inside your harsh exterior. Early niceness will lose the chick. Similarly, when you catch a fish, got to give it a hard jerk to set the hook. You let it run only after it is well and truly hooked. There comes a time in the relationship when you need to give her some beta provider game, or else you will lose her. But if you give her beta provider game too soon, too easily, or too much, you will also lose her, to someone who is a much bigger asshole than you are.

If you want a society where men act well, you need a society where men that act well get laid. Thus for civilization, must have patriarchy, and that patriarchy will be very forcefully resisted by women howling for their demon lover, and has to be very forcefully imposed on those women.

How forcefully? Well, England before 1810 or so was fairly successful at keeping women in line, and frequently deployed methods that would make the Taliban blush, methods that horrified the Victorians. We need to copy eighteenth century England, eighteenth century Virginia, and early nineteenth century Australia. The Old Testament gave women a legal status similar to that of modern day pets, and eighteenth century England was only marginally more progressive than Old Testament Israel. And to the extent that it was marginally more progressive than old Testament Israel, I would argue that this was a big mistake that led to the disaster we now suffer.

Giving women legal status similar to that of pets would have two effects: It would reward civilized behavior, and it would raise fertility to Timor Leste levels. Now some of my commenters are worried about white fertility. If whites were reproducing at Timor Leste levels, pretty soon we would need to conquer inferior races, take their land, and restrain them from reproducing. Oh the horror. Which reasoning seems scarcely different from the proposition that Europeans should restrain their reproduction so that we can benevolently rescue four billion African refugees over the next forty years.

Jim, Jim's Blog 14 Comments [9/22/2017 10:45:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 130797

why arent chad lites talked about in this sub?

chad lites are fucking all the sub 8 women. these guys are usually tatted all over, tall, and pretty skinny with no muscles. FHO's are so fucking thirsty for these guys, for example I was listening to these guys brag about how they have banged thousands of femoids and they aren't even that good looking, just they look like degenerates which females absolutely gush over. Chad lites are usually into drugs like heroin or codeine or pills. they usually sell drugs too.

examples of chad lites, scrim from suicide boys, adam grandmaison from no jumper, bryan gozzling from hookuphotshot, etc............

I call these guys niche-Chads. Because they're not desirable to mainstream society, but they get a lot of clunge in their own niche.

the_worst_93 and yamayamahahahaha, /r/IncelReddit 5 Comments [8/28/2017 9:27:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127906

Australia Prepares to Ban Sex Offenders from Travelling Overseas
Posted on June 3, 2017 by holocaust21
Australia is imminently going to ban sex offenders from travelling overseas. The world just keeps on getting worse

holocaust21, Resisting the coming 21st century holocaust – Men's Rights, Youth Rights, Sexual Rights 5 Comments [6/7/2017 1:30:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: steve rocco
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 128602

straight men have the worst sex that is just a fact all they know how to do is jackhammer damaging your insides & nut in 5 minutes

junieisms, Twitter 12 Comments [6/28/2017 1:30:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127106

As many of you may know, a lady across the street (who lives alone) gave me some cupcakes a couple of weeks ago. I didn’t really think anything of it, I just figured she was being neighborly. That was until yesterday, right before the scheduled True Capitalist Radio show.

There was 15 minutes before the broadcast, so I took my dog Templeton outside so he can take care of his business. I was out front walking him around then, out of the corner of my eye, this lady is walking towards me with a new batch of cupcakes. She approached me and says, “Happy Cinco de Mayo!” Then proceeds to give me a container of Cinco de Mayo themed cupcakes.

Being a nice, guy I took them from her and thanked her for the last batch she made me. She smiled and said that she enjoyed making them for me and that I should “stop by some time.” And then walked back to her house across the street.

So I go back into my house with Templeton and the cupcakes, and there was Mrs. Ghost waiting with a not so happy look on her face. Mrs. Ghost proceeded to ask me why that “bitch” keeps coming up to me and baking me things. I insisted to Mrs. Ghost that I’ve only spoken with this woman twice (both of the times she gave me cupcakes) and tried to calm her down; but Mrs. Ghost wasn’t having it. Mrs. Ghost wanted to go over to the woman’s house and throw the cupcakes in her face and to tell her to leave me alone.

Meanwhile, it was like 5 minutes till the TCR broadcast and I had a potential cat fight on my hands. So I did the man thing to do and I canceled the show and spent time with Mrs. Ghost. I promised her that I am not exchanging her confections for affection and that this lady is obviously trying to cause problems. She finally agreed with me and let it go after a couple of hours.

In summation, I had to cancel the show yesterday because some lonely broad across the street gave me some cupcakes again. I prevented a potential escalated situation and took responsibility for my home; it’s tough being a man! Why is it that women want other people’s relationships instead of their own? Woman are their own biggest haters!

Ghost, Ghost.Report 10 Comments [5/12/2017 1:24:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 135917

Female genital mutilation should be advocated in the West

Women need to get rid of their sexual impulses in order to become more responsive for child caring and household activities. Sexual deviance just destruct society we need to be more open about old fashion methods to bring the society back to a more civilized manner where bestiality and sex is controlled.

Homosapicuckus, incels.me 12 Comments [1/12/2018 11:27:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 128876

The boyfriend objection is when a girl says "I have a boyfriend." The boyfriend may or may not actually exist. According to The Shit Test Encyclopedia, the correct translation of this phrase is, "I have Schrödinger’s boyfriend, demonstrate to me you’re high value and I'll fuck you regardless."[1]

Motives for using this objection

An unemotional "I have a BF" response can also be a way of telling you to fuck off. On the other hand, if the situation has been escalating up till this point, it's probably last minute resistance.

Part of her goal may be to avoid responsibility for what she's about to do, since she can think to herself, "I put up resistance by telling him I had a boyfriend, but he went ahead and seduced me anyway." It can also be a way of telling you that she wants alpha fucks with no strings attached. It can also be a way of telling you that she needs you to be discreet (so that she doesn't get a reputation as a slut).

Possible responses to this objection

• "Good! He'll listen to your emotional problems and take you to romantic dinners, while I'll use you for sex/fun/[whatever you find appropriate that alludes to sex]."
• "Damn, I've only known you x mins/hrs and already you're telling me your problems."
• "Oh, so when's the wedding?" Usually the shock of that question will help loosen the mood and show how serious she is about her SO or if she's just using it as an excuse to get you to fuck off.
• "Where's he at?" "(Not here)" "Aww, how come?"
• "Don't worry, I'm not the jealous type."
• "What's that have to do with me?"
• "I won't tell if you don't."
• "Sorry, he's not invited."[2]
• "I know." (Kisses passionately)
• "Me too"
• "lol"[3]
• "So?"
• (Ignores it altogether and continues escalating)
• HB10: "Oh did I mention I have a boyfriend/husband?" 1026: "Yeah, you did. Like 5 seconds ago" *continues to plough ahead*[4]

Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 20 Comments [7/5/2017 8:33:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 133602

Lon, your fairy tales are just that – fairy tales. They have little to do with an actual state of most human beings. Simply put, if feminism made all the men in the world incel they’d quickly tear the system down and massacre those responsible. They wouldn’t listen to middle-aged men who have given up telling them to “let go of hate”.

Feminism is hate itself. It can only be defeated by hating it even more. Men most forgo some “consent” crap as long it isn’t defined in it’s sane form – as a differentiation between a married woman cheating or a married woman being raped. The OT often didn’t even make the distinction between an unmarried girl being raped and her just fooling around. It mattered very little to the consequence, which was that the guy was to marry her. That’s how a man is to think. You can’t think in any other way.

Also, your loaf of bread thing is also incorrect. At times, dealing with women can inflict worse pains that simply never having any experience. I was basically a feminist until I got more experience with women and saw what they really were – animals. Now I have more experience exactly because I ditched feminism and treated them like the animals they are. I wish it weren’t so but the only culture where women do behave is a patriarchal civilization where men guide them to good behavior.

caamib, Rants of an incel 25 Comments [10/30/2017 7:50:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 131276

As much as women claim to spend all their time “thinking about their relationships”, they really don’t. And it’s obvious in how they save the savage cruelly for the men they proclaim to love the most. When a woman says she’s “thinking about him”. she’s really thinking about what she’s GETTING from him.

Eduardo the Magnificent, Notes from a Red Pill Girl 4 Comments [9/5/2017 10:31:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 137246

People on here often use Telling Everyone Real Facts...

You'll also notice terf is factually incorrect, and "transsexist" because terfs do include transmen in their feminism, seeing as transmen are female and deserve the protections that women have due to biology, and are welcome in most female only spaces. Everything always has to be about the born males.

Personally I've openly described myself as a terf, I've even half attempted to reclaim "transphobic". Transphobic has officially lost all meaning because absolutely fucking everything is transphobic, even being vegan. I have said actually my fears of what is happening to women's rights in the name of transgenderhood is terrifying. We are all being terrorised by thought police into silence and our fears should be taken seriously not dismissed as an irrational phobia.

Patodp, Mumsnet 5 Comments [3/14/2018 2:00:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127206

We hear a lot about "Domestic Abuse" these days; but NOTHING is ever said about stubborn or rebellious wives. How about a new term called... Domestic Rebellion? Or, perhaps we should term it... Domestic Laziness. Or, perhaps just a simple... Domestic Bad Attitude! The entire legal system has turned vicious against working fathers in America. This is a woeful evil, and will ultimately bring the judgment of God upon this cursed nation. Feminism is one of the evil children of Communism, intended to subvert American women into aborting (murdering) their babies, proclaiming Sexual Liberation, and divorcing their husbands. No wonder lesbianism is skyrocketing!!!

If you think there's not a satanic agenda in America at work trying to destroy your marriage, home and children... WAKE UP!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 12 Comments [5/16/2017 2:03:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 135887

If a female is younger than 8, and you want to fuck her, then you must have the permission of the male authority who owns her: a father, a husband, or another male relative. If for some reason no man owns her, perhaps because she’s an orphan or whatever, then you can rape her at will.

If a woman is 8 or older, and you want to fuck her, then either she is married and you have to ask permission to fuck her from her husband (and why would you? men don’t usually agree to becoming cuckolds), or she is not married, meaning she is under no one’s authority, being no one’s property — because the hitherto recognized authority of fathers or other male relatives no longer applies after reaching that age — and, therefore, she is “fair game” and you can fuck her at will.

An 8-year-old woman ceases to be the property of her blood family; she can only belong to a husband. Otherwise, if there’s no husband to own her, she doesn’t legally belong to anyone – RAPE HER ALL YOU LIKE.

THE DAILY ANTIFEMINIST, The World's Most Taboo-Breaking Anti-Feminist Blog 12 Comments [1/12/2018 11:20:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: X
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 133947

Recently, my computer had a temporary breakdown and I was off this sub. and god, I felt a lot more relaxed. You'd think you'd get used to it, but I can't even bring myself to read the articles now, only your comments. I simply cannot bear to read any more trans shit from them. Those completely male voices...that way they are so unaware of how male they come across. Always got that same male tone: that short, to the point, efficient, unemotional tone. Always instantly ordering women to obey, threatening to hurt themselves..oh, wait, no I meant, hurt you...

I read the headlines, and that's as much as I can bear. I found I was reading articles and beginning to shout at the walls, carrying on imaginary conversations..or rather rants! I feel such rage, when I see things like TW saying lesbians should be 'open' to accepting a penis..if you arent naturally open to it, then this means you've got to force yourself into sex you dont want, because of all these thirsty, predatory TW. How can cisdykes and transdykes get closer?" asks a sincere (fucking stupid handmaiden lesbian) idiot.

"Lots of sex and not fucking up but mainly lots of sex" is the answer. Not fucking up? What does that mean? It means, put the TW first and police yourself very carefully and just like any battered wife, make yourself a doormat, tremble and be available. They are abusers. Its giving me heartburn. Tension in the shoulders. God knows how much stored up inside. I find I obsess about it...its just so horrifying, and its everywhere, and still most people think TW are sweet and humble and have operations. Are like Kim in "Different For Girls"..if you've seen that, of course you are on Kim's side, and you'd accept her as almost female, near enough makes no odds.

Yet now there's a film like Tangeroine where a TW batters a woman. A man, beats a woman and its art.I cannot stand it anymore. I dont live in the UK and there's nothing I can do. Are any of you suffering actual physical symptoms?

secondtidalwave2, r/GenderCritical 2 Comments [11/8/2017 10:30:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126196

Normie fathers of daughters are pathetic

They all beta orbit around their daughters, our modern society taught men to worship them. They are in love with them while their wives lose their looks and become bitter and asexual. They find in them the innocence they always wanted from their girlfriends, and then try hard to protect their "princess" from evil Chads who will fuck them and turn them into same whores who made beta fathers' lives so miserable. Just hear them talk about their daughters, it's so obvious their dicks are hard when they go on about how beautiful they are and how they'd do anything for them, how they love them more than anything.

All that happens is that the bitch daughter grows up stuck up feeling like a prize, that is confirmed by all other beta men, and then to everyone's surprise she still gives her cunt to be busted by Chad and beta father is cucked once again. It's hilarious.

Alia_Harkonnen, /r/incels 10 Comments [4/11/2017 9:07:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129071

[Last quote from "Girl Quotes Translated to English"]

Trying my hand at some common dating profile copy:

"I'm curvy" - I'm fat

"I'm a BBW" - I'm very fat and also ugly

"I have (x number of) kids and they're my world" - I regret having these kids which make it so hard for me to date

"I love adventures" - I love selecting a new show to binge watch

"Looking for a partner in crime" - looking for a dick or looking to have food/drinks bought for me

"I love hiking/the outdoors" - I like being in nature no more than once a month but tweet and upload photos incessantly when I do

"I'm a badass chick" - I'm a basic bitch with no intellectual interests

Sisyphus, Roosh V Forums 10 Comments [7/10/2017 12:53:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 134495

A femoids purity lies entirely within how many people it has had sexual intercourse with and what kind of sexual stuff it has engaged in. To be pure, a femoid must remain a virgin (virginally and analy) until marriage without engaging in any kind of repugnant or hedonistic behavior with men that it does not know of. Unfortunately, in this day and age, finding a bitch who is a virgin is like finding a needle in a haystack; it's nothing but an impossible task.

Why aren't femoids pure anymore? What is the reason for this phenomenon, you may ask. While there are multiple reasons, it could be narrowed down to two main reasons: one being, sexual freedom. And the other being, feminism. These two factors are responsible for the destruction of the femoid organisms, especially the cunts that are raised in this degenerate generation.

Femoid sexual freedom itself was the biggest mistake mankind has ever made. I mean, just think about it: cuntrags are the gatekeepers of sex, in which, they are the ones who decides who they want to have sex with. By giving them sexual freedom one breaks the natural order that has been going on for centuries, which is, men being the ones deciding who bitches should mate with. But now, due to these creatures having immense amount of sexual freedom, they single-handedly hold the monopoly over every man in this world.

When it comes to feminism, it has ruined femoids by indoctrinating them with false and degenerate beliefs. The feminist legbeards view slutting around with multiple people as "empowerment" and "progression" to a point where they brainwash impressionable femoids at a young age saying how there is nothing wrong getting railed by multiple men a week. Cum dumpsters being idiotic as they are listen to these false teaching only in turn engage in degenerate behavior. And by doing so, not only these bitches lose their virginity at a very young age, but they keep on riding the cawk arousal until their cunts are battered, mangled loose beef curtains.

Back in the day, the purity of a femoid was not only encouraged and supported but cherished as well. However, in this day and age, femoid purity is slowly turning itself into a myth, in which, it will become history in a few decades.

Lookismisreal, RealIncel 14 Comments [11/24/2017 3:30:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Antiincel
WTF?! || meh