Quote# 128600

Relationships are not about love, that’s a modernist lie. Love should come later in the relationship, and not be a core basis. Nearly no couple ever loves each other after a couple years together, they just tolerate each other. Naturally women want a man who can support them, and give them strong children that he can also support, a man wants a female who can take care of the home and the children and give him strong children. It’s nature, sweetcheeks, get with it, or get out.

national-syndicalist-action-blog, Tumblr 13 Comments [6/28/2017 1:29:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 134949

Mid 20's College sluts are dried up old hags.

I'm 21, I don't want to fuck women older than me for the next 10 years.

The fucking day I hit 18 I realized it would just be old hags from now on, and that's when I realized AoC laws are fucked up. I wanted to stay with the 16 and 17 year old girls I liked. I still want them.

Women get uglier as they get older.


I just want to fuck high school sluts.

Fucking actual children disgusts me.
Move to the UK then. Or Germany. Or Argentina. Or any other country with a <16 AoC

Why do I have to move to a different country just to be with the type of women I like?

It would take me a long time to get that money, even if it was just for a temporary holiday.

Why can't the AoC just be set by nature's own rules in all western nations. I shouldn't have to go out of my way to just get a hot 16 year old.

They are fine, even 20 is okay, but limiting yourself to women within 3 years doesn't give you many women. I want to widen my selection. Also nothing will best a 16 year old girl ever. 16 year old girls are made for sex.

The large majority of women in my uni classes are a older than me and I find none of them attractive. Fucking not even one, except an Egyptian girl and I don't want to mix.

Too compare, I found every single girl in my high school year attractive except the hambeasts.

High school girls also wont yap on to me about their dumb political opinions.

Anonymous, 4plebs 15 Comments [12/8/2017 6:35:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 136039

The Last Jedi: De-Feminized Fanedit (aka The Chauvinist Cut)

Specs: 1280×720, x264, 46 minutes, MP3 2.0 audio

Basically The Last Jedi minus Girlz Powah and other silly stuff.

It would probably be easier to make a list of things that were kept instead of things that were changed. Hardly any scene got away without cuts.

The resulting movie is (wait for it …) 46 minutes long.

Yeah I know, it’s not ideal. It’s made from a CAM source (the most recent HDTC one with the Asian hard subs, which is pretty watchable). It has issues. But it had to be done.

You will probably enjoy it most when you view it less as a blockbuster movie and more as some kind of episode from some non-existent mediocre Star Wars series.

Here’s a short rundown of changes (spoilers! full list in description.txt):
– No whiny/reluctant/murderous psycho Luke.
– NO HALDO! She simply doesn’t exist. Her whole subplot doesn’t exist. The Kamikaze is carried out by Poe. ( = Poe dies.)
– Leia never scolds, questions nor demotes Poe.
– Lea dies. Kylo kills her.
– Kylo is more badass and much less conflicted and volatile.
– Kylo takes on more of Snoke’s guards, Rey struggles with a single one.
– No bomber heroism by china girl in the beginning.
– No Canto Bight.
– No superpowered Rey.
– Luke is not a semi-force-ghost and is smashed by the first laser cannon shot. (sorry, I just had to!)
– Phasma is finished after the first blow by Finn. (Women are naturally weaker than men, she isn’t force-sensitive, and we know nothing about any exo-skeleton in her suit)
– Asian chick speaks less, doesn’t bully Finn, Finn doesn’t try to escape, she is never formally introduced. She is just there and occasionally smiles at Finn or screams “Finn!”. She has no sister. Serves her right for all the heinous stuff she did.
– Lots of little cuts reducing the number of female facial shots. Too many to count. (Pun intended.)
– Quite a few scenes rearranged so that the flow of the shortened movie is still somewhat coherent.

Obviously it’s far from perfect. The source is not even on DVD-level. Some of the technical edits were slacked because why not, it’s a CAM source (e.g. some masks and Snoke disappearing). Sometimes there’s an extreme zoom despite the mediocre quality. There are plotholes and continuity errors and some cuts are not as smooth as they should be, especially audio transition-wise. But for what it’s worth, it can now at least be viewed without feeling nauseaus about most of the terrible big and small decisions they made in this film. Also, at least the intro sequence is now very watchable and actually much cooler without all of Leia’s nitpicking. Now it’s all one united Resistance fighting without inner conflict and that’s much more satisfying to watch. Due to the extreme shortening, the whole movie is much more fast-paced now, at times unfortuantely also rushed due to a lack of usable filler footage

Anonymous, Pharyngula 16 Comments [1/17/2018 3:34:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: TB Tabby
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 29161

I am from India, but I have been living in Saudi Arabia for 20 years.

I am married and I have daughters. We don't have a driver - I drive them about myself. This works fine and the women in my family do not want to drive.

In the interests of safety and security, I don't want women driving in Saudi Arabia

Women should not be allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia. If this happens, there will be more crime, accidents and disorder.

There will be more accidents because of the increase in traffic. However, the government is preparing for more traffic by building new roads and new overhead bridges.

If Saudi Arabia allows women to drive, there will have to be more law-enforcement officers in and around the cities.

There would also have to be more night patrols throughout the kingdom. There would also have to be women-only garages and service centres.

It will mean more social problems in the future.

Maybe a few women do want to drive, but this is not really a big issue.

In the interests of safety and security - I don't want women driving in Saudi Arabia.

Ibrahim, BBC News 29 Comments [9/21/2007 11:10:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129007

Anonymous, Whisper 8 Comments [7/8/2017 6:14:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 140423

blackpills dropped on the front page

The media always have lied abour women being the empathetic gender. It turned out men is the most honest gender of the 2. Talk about fake news that the media try to spread against men.

They don't have fucking empathy, they don't even feel love.

Men feel love and passion so much stronger than women do. A wife will lie, steal, cheat, abuse, etc to her husband and he will stick around and try to make it work. Even though he should leave, he will stay because he loves this woman. She is his everything. But a woman will dump him the split second a hotter guy smiles her way. It's fucking insane.

I have no doubt women cheat more, just from personal experience and experience of friends (And talking to women)

Loyalty is a male concept

Not necessarily. Look up the blackpill research on this. Women that are virgins going into marriage overwhelmingly stay loyal, and the marriage lasts both partners lifetime in more than 80% of cases. The more men the woman has been with before marriage, the greater the chance that the marriage ends in failure, to the point where it's basically guaranteed to fail if the woman has had a certain number of partners. Men don't pair bond through sex, but women do, so this makes a lot of sense. The more casual sex a woman has, the more her ability to pair bond gets burned out... So, if you want a happy marriage with a loyal grill who actually loves you; marry a virgin with an intact pair bonding ability. Sex will seal the partnership and you'll live happily together. Marry a 20+ body count sloot and sex will literally mean nothing to her and she'll feel no desire to remain loyal.

CelderSrolls & hello237878, r/Braincels 3 Comments [9/13/2018 2:12:32 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 139336

My Stacy sister knows what an incel is

We were casually watching a TV show and some guy on TV got rejected. And she was like “he’s such an incel haha right Mike?”

I was petrified, I thought she was onto me and the fact I browse this site. So I was like “huh haha” pretending I didn’t know what she was talking about. Then she told me to look it up and I was like “nah I’m good”.

Why are you scared? If I had a sister, I'd be sure to discipline her so that she doesn't become the typical degenerate.

Make clear you stand higher on the family hierarchy.

RodgersSecondAdvent, incels.me 6 Comments [7/30/2018 8:10:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 137279

Hot off the presses, a criminally patriarchal research paper has concluded that men with higher income and status have more reproductive success than women with high income and status have in industrialized nations. First, to set the table, an excerpt from the abstract:

It is concluded that an evolutionary perspective helps explain reproductive patterns in modern humans and may thus make a valuable contribution in the assessment of urgent contemporary problems.

The sexual market is the one market to rule them all, across space and time.
– Le 156% Heartiste

[Tweet by Rolf Degen]

Contrary to women, men still convert higher income and status into greater reproductive success in industrialized nations.

Female hypergamy, female education, female economic self-sufficiency, low female fertility…choose any four.

In terms of social and economic status, men date across and down, women date across and up. Industrialized societies filled with overeducated careerist shrikes make it more difficult for both men and women to find long-term reproductive partners. What the West has done is weaponize female hypergamy, so that the only winner in this zero sum mating game are the HSMV alpha males who can serially date and marry increasingly younger women.

In the modren West, overeducated, careerist women are DARWINIAN LOSERS. They now join the lonesome ranks of fat women, ugly women, and old spinsters. Lean in? Try barren quim.

Low status beta and omega males are bigger losers in this new world order than they were before under the rock solid pre-femcunt patriarchal system, because the women who would be theirs under the old rules have decided to skip past them for a shot at 1. the high status alpha or 2. a tub of ben and jerrys.

The biggest DARWINIAN WINNERS are the charming jerkboy cads and the sociopath hedge funders.


Potential fertility — that’s a nerdy way to say “sexiness”. Men with high social and economic status in industrialized and primitive nations alike — HSMV alphas — monopolize the hottest babes, and probably more than their fair share of the plain janes too. The Pill and condom don’t thwart the sex act; those things just thwart the consequence of the sex act, and incentivize women to liberate their sexuality (which in practice means liberating themselves from beta males). Imagine how many little snot-nosed Heartistes (heartots?) would be running around creating kindergarten mayhem if the Industrial Contraception Complex didn’t exist.

How unequally is sex distributed in industrialized jizztopias? Very:

[image taken from a tweet by Rolf Degen]

There are interesting eugenic/dysgenic possibilities to ponder from this knowledge. There is dysgenic selection pressure on high status women — at least as measured by income, social status, and their proxy, IQ — but eugenic selection pressure on their male counterparts, the HSMV alphas who are having more kids.

This isn’t a complete picture, though, because female mate worth is so much more tied into their physical beauty. Those HSMV alpha males are choosing less educated, less wealthy, lower SES “status” women who are younger, hotter, tighter, so by Darwinian calculation the end result is very eugenic: capable sons and pretty daughters. This is evidence that the West is beginning to pursue the patented CH BOSSS strategy of sexual market health and societal reinvigoration.

I’ve been warning about this stuff for a while, and I’m glad to see ¡SCIENCE! finally catching up with Heartistian observations. There was only ever going to be one effective response by men to the emergence of weaponized female hypergamy (and it wasn’t cuddly beta supplication).

Game will save the West….in one respect, by heightening its late stage contradictions and encouraging a change in course.


On the silliness of the “wage gap”:

[Tweets in quotes blocks, each line by a different account]

"On the next edition of "Who Gives A Shit"..."

A lot of people apparently, because that could be a component of the so called "wage gap", ie men have very important reasons to make more money/status.]

…and the silliness of the feminist narrative about the “patriarchy”:

Science is descriptive, not prescriptive. It also goes against the feminist narrative that the patriarchy stops women from succeeding. No, men simply have more incentive to work high effort/high status jobs. Therefore the priorities of women and men are different.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 7 Comments [3/15/2018 1:07:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 133372

i have never EVER seen a female get bullied for real, yeah maybe she will get teased as a joke but that's as far as it ever goes, and guess what happened even if she got only teased by a guy? holy fuck, millions of white knights "YO THATS NOT COOL BRO APOLOGIZE BRO WTF BRO". Meanwhile boys get bullied all the time for real, even for the most inconsequential shit, and nobody ever steps to their aid. if you're incel, even any friends you have will turn on you in a nanosecond, so just lol at females being bullied

whogivesafucc, r/incels 13 Comments [10/23/2017 2:59:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 140137

I think he was primarily speaking of the biological nature of the female half of the human species. They are built to care. In the same way they care for children, they care for the material in this world. Women are considered frivolous for this reason. They care about diamonds and pearls, they care about aesthetic beauty, they care about every last facet of a man so as to weigh his worth. They care about intelligence, strength, power, skill, etc. Caring cuts down to the bone of women whether they care for children or for money or material locations (Paris, etc)

It is this tendency to care for things that gives them desire, and, as the opposite of loyal (man), women are primarily concerned with themselves and their own interests. There is no true loyalty in the mind of a woman. There is only self-interest. Women see the weak and defective, and they care for them and then walk away. In their natural habit they would never let a weakling have sexual intercourse with them. This is the fundamental driver of evolution. Women are the gate keepers of sex. This is why Nietzsche considered them higher life-forms than men. They are so self-interested and manipulative that, on a certain level, they do not see others as human beings, they see tools to get things they want. A terribly feminine woman just wants admiration (something they care about) once they've got acceptance in a tribe.

They just want to be seen as a grand, superior life-form that is higher in rank than those around it. The rank matters because it is a measure of worth, and worth is something women care about. It's just will to power in action. Women use their ability to care to see every last bit of another human being, and they manipulate others to get what they need. Women don't even feel negative emotions in the same way that men do, their amygdala activates differently, so they are better at emotional recollection than emotional experience. It would be disadvantageous for women to really understand human emotion as it would be retard their ability to freely manipulate and use. For men have historically been nothing more than tools to women. If you pay attention, you'll find that women selfishly have kids even though they're well aware life is hell, and someday their children will suffer over what they've done.

Women are constantly leaving men for something superior. It's sad but true. You, of course, get exceptions to rules, but it's rare. This is probably what Lanza meant by selfish. They are not built that way through society. It is in their blood and bones to choose the superior life form and run with it. This is why so many mass-shooters hate women. They are aware of what they truly are, and it takes a sufficient amount of time in isolation to realize it. This is what Adam Lanza saw in his mother. "I want what I want, and you're coming whether you want to or not." This is what Adam thought about his mother as she forced him onto this earth, forced onto him her "love" so that he became weak in a brutal society, and then forced him out of his cocoon.

Women really are selfish. My father has seen it. I have seen it, and Adam Lanza has seen it... It can't be helped. They are highly evolved lifeforms that perpetuate the species, and they must be fundamentally cruel so it is driven forward.

Whysomangry, Columbine High School Massacre Discussion Forum 2 Comments [8/28/2018 1:35:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 132030

As long as there is a systematic oppression on women by men and a mental conditioning on women from their birth, I don't believe there's real consent in heterosexual acts. And I do believe that women identified women (aka women living for themselves according to their own codes, free from patriarchal conditioning, nothing to do with identity politic and trans bs) should avoid having hetero intercourses, as long as the oppression is here.

Wich does'nt necessarily mean a complete separation from males of course, just no sexual or romance stuff. And it doesnt mean not having kids either. But that's just pure theory of course, if a woman wants to have sex with a male i'm not going to prevent her. I just don't believe in the reality of «choice», there's too much factors. But there is a moral difference between things that should be banned and things we should just criticize.

RadFHarva, r/Ask_Radical_Feminists 3 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 131073

Why Incels should consider to support Islam

I know this sound silly, but at the end of this post it will all make sense. Im not here to actually convince to you that Allah exist, because he doesn't. Im an atheist myself but I pose as a muslim and I do that because I see what Islam does to countries. Islam is the biggest anti-chad religion there is and I know that if Islam gains enough influence in my country(sweden) It will be considerably easier to earn pussy. Islam originated as a religion but it also doubles as a tool to distribute women among men and this is the sole reason why Incels should become a '' muslim '' and support it.

There is literally nothing to lose for Incels to support Islam and Islamic immigration. By doing that not only will you be fucking chads over while you will also be increasing your own chance of getting laid. And for those that think that supporting Islam will be too slow to affect your life time, you're wrong. Islam has almost taken power in sweden and It won't be long till I get a muslim wife and end my celibacy.

k0sidian, /r/incels 7 Comments [8/28/2017 2:39:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129219

*someone asked when are girls tits and ass fully develop*

about 10-12

which begs the question, if they are fully developed why is that illegal?

I don't know.

y0jimbo, Bodybuilding Forums 8 Comments [7/14/2017 5:12:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 132409

[Source NSFW]

Be proud and make no apologies for it. Keep it growing strong by passing it down to our younger generations. We lead by example and should take advantage of that in our own homes. Save our boys from becoming feminized snowflakes that society is infested with today.
Name call and disrespect the women bitches who come around. Humiliate them and laugh afterwards. Encourage sexist behavior. Leave porn laying around so it is easily accessible. Rage and aggression show male domination. Do your part to contribute to the fall of feminism.


(Image transcript: a black-and-white image of a hand pointing towards the screen, overlaid with red all-caps text reading "GROW A SET - BE A MAN - MISOGYNY - PATRIARCHY - THE RIGHT WAY OF LIFE")

misogynist-strong, Tumblr 11 Comments [10/1/2017 11:11:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 128270

[Note: this is the "MAN UP YOUR DICKS and FIRE UP YOUR BALLS" guy from here.]

The hypergamy chart shows the current HB9-10 women not pairing.

Are the 9-10s lavishing themselves on Epstein's yaht or globtrotting with rich playboys? If they stay off their breeding years until it's too late, that results in an ongoing 'shaving' effect off the top tier of genestock. As per the chart, the HB10 men are diffusing their traits with 3s (unbelievably) all the way up through the 8.9-9.0 but not the top tier 9+.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE 9+ females? Where did they go? Are they not breeding anymore!

Here's what will happen if the 9-10 women aren't bred. The overall top barscale will keep falling. Women worldwide will become raunchier, beastlier and less beautiful if WE DON'T BREED THE TIPPY TOP for nothing more than the sake of expediting her development of all palpable eggs. If the top women keep being capped and not bred, the bar will go lower and lower until short fat rough Samoan women with the characteristic oily ruddy complexions will be considered desirable. The top must be bred with impunity and divine purpose and I mean it - - (abuwalalalala) [speaking in tongues] - Hail the patriarchy!

So I searched 'hb10' to find a pic and see if any of the superfine women of the world were breeding at all. To my surprise, the top result in searching 'hb10' was 'House Bill 10, Georgia General Assembly' - assault weapons bill. ((we'd better keep an eye on that one))

So then instead I just googled 'most beautiful women'. Just what I wanted. It turned up mostly models. It seems unlikely they'll breed this year or next. At their peak of hotness:

Russian model Ekaterina Fetirina:

German actress Candice Swanepoel:

And this poor lass. It's doubtful she'll ever find the time to breed.

The opportunity passing her is so giant. I hear the eerie low pitched sound of wind blowing through the cables of the Golden Gate bridge when I look at her. It's a low vibe that registers in your balls is best I can describe. It's the sound of her telemeres wailing before they groan and become silent within the next 8-10 years.

This is why game is so important. Industrious prodigies and even regular Joes with IQs and matching egos could have gamed any one of these broads in their teen years before they sold their souls to their respective sterile industries. If you're red pill and desire to pass on your bloodline, then keep the game sharp and keep the radar out for the young budding 9-10s because they will ALL be snatched up quickly and very likely by forces and individuals that really do not have much concern for the future of the west. Bless the west. It's TURKEY SHOOT season on 9-10s. It is too bittersweet to see them modeling and being vacuumed up by jew pornographers. May western men domesticate them and keep them stuffed like breeding turkeys. Amen.

(babawinngaboooyaaah) [more tongues]


MCGOO, Return of Kings 16 Comments [6/19/2017 5:29:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew
WTF?! || meh

WARNING: Disturbing, Graphic Content Ahead

Child and infant rape with BDSM, Legally binding pedophile apologia

Quote# 141129

This post has one of the highest proportions of "legitimately serious possible triggers" to words I've seen: Count(triggers) / Count(words) hardly ever hits closer to 1 than this, so I'm not even going to try to list them; the "award" alone should give enough caution of what lies below. There are at least a couple things that cross over into other hotbeds of psychological traumatization, ones barely tangentially related to any form of child abuse or rape. I put what I thought were the worst parts in light grey, and I decreased the font size (partially for length and partially as a subtle, mild deterrent). If you decide to start reading this, and it starts fucking with you mentally, or even if you start wondering if what might come next will, then just stop. I should have. –shy

Court says ‘pedophilia does not apply’ — because perpetrator is a woman

Female pedophiles. She-monsters.

No such thing. Probably not. A woman can’t be a pedophile. Probably not. The clinical research is thin. Maybe the experts will change their mind, by and by. That happens a lot in the imprecise science of psychiatry.Although one expert’s mind was not changed by this:

A toddler sits at the woman’s feet, his small hands holding on to either leg. In this position, the woman — naked below the waist — masturbates using a baby bottle. The toddler, giggling, then grabs the bottle and drinks from it. The woman looks directly into the camera and smiles. That was one video seized by police from the Toronto home where the woman lived with her husband. On another video, the same woman is lying in bed with the same toddler. Both are naked. She begins to lick the child’s anus. Looking at the camera, she smacks her lips. A third video: The little boy is seated naked on a change table. The woman puts the child’s penis into her mouth. The child giggles.

In all, investigators discovered 25,066 child pornography images on more than 50 electronic devices when they executed a search warrant on April 25, 2016, including 111 child porn movies.

The couple is also shown engaging in BDSM (bondage/domination/sadism/masochism) activities with other couples. Police also found a contract signed by the “Slave” and her “Master,” an agreement containing rules and tasks to be completed by the woman as the submissive member in the relationship. They’d met through a website called “Bondage.com.” That’s who Jason Dickens and Dylan McEwen were, a man and woman joined in holy BDSM during a 2007 “collaring” ceremony — literally collaring — followed a year later by an ordinary wedding in front of family and friends.

Last week, Dickens, a former actor on Degrassi High, pleaded guilty to several child pornography offences, including two counts of making child porn, with an agreed statement of facts read into the record. Earlier this year, McEwen also pleaded guilty to sexual assault and two child pornography offences. She was sentenced to six years. But what the presiding judge would not do was declare McEwen a dangerous offender, which the Crown had sought and with impassioned urgency. In rejecting the long-term offender order, Justice Kathleen Caldwell weighed the various criteria that must be met, primarily a “substantial risk of reoffence.” Caldwell determined that McEwen wasn’t such a risk, relying heavily on the evidence and psychiatric report prepared by a forensic psychiatrist with expertise in paraphilia and sexual deviancy.

Dr. Mark Pearce was agreed upon as an expert witness by both the Crown and the defence when he testified in February. He diagnosed McEwen as a masochist and low-risk to reoffend [sic]. Caldwell accepted Pearce’s conclusion that McEwen derived sexual arousal not from acts committed against children but from the “extreme humiliation” of her involvement in those acts, which fed her masochism, described as on the moderately severe end.

The judge wrote (and read aloud in court): “Dr. Pearce testified that the current research suggests that women do not suffer from paraphilic disorders apart from masochism. This fact lends further weight to the conclusion that pedophilia does not apply to you.”

Crown Attorney Lisa Henderson, the judge noted, had “rigorously challenged” Pearce on this assertion.

“(I) agree that at first blush it appears illogical that women do not suffer from other paraphilic disorders,” Caldwell continued. “Sometimes, however, that which appears reasonable is anything but and vice versa. I accept the doctor’s evidence on this point. He did agree that this conclusion might change in the future as psychiatry continues to develop, but I cannot base my conclusions on speculative potential that have yet to develop.”

In this particular case, McEwen was her husband’s slave, committed to do his bidding. Court also heard, however, that McEwen had initiated at least one of the toddler videos without her “Master” present. And in at least two earlier instances, McEwen had obtained child pornography from two men she’d met online before she’d even met Dickens.

As for the risk-assessment testing, Caldwell acknowledged that such testing hasn’t been validated as being accurate in predicting risk with female, as opposed to male, sex offenders. They don’t really know what they’re talking about, the experts, because they haven’t looked at the phenomenon closely enough.

As an aside, at the Dickens trial, court heard that in 2003 a London-area woman offered him her 14-year-old daughter for sex after they’d connected online. Dickens took the teenager on a movie and date night, then had sex at the girl’s home while her mother sat beside them. Sex with teens and children had clearly been a feature of the couple’s role-playing, in their video commentary to one another, the child porn retrieved from their home and posters also discovered depicting female children, labelled with such descriptors as “15-year-old f--- slut” and “whore.”

In an interview this week with the Star, Pearce emphasized the scarcity of research literature on female sex offenders: “I’m not saying there’s no such thing as a female pedophile , but it is almost an exclusively male disorder. That’s not to say no woman has it. There may be some outliers. But women (sex offenders) usually offend for other reasons, not because of an innate sexual attraction to children. [...] These are damaged, needy, lonely women, not necessarily pedophiles.”

There was immense frustration at 720 Bay — in the attorney general’s office — over McEwen dodging the dangerous offender designation. But there will be no appeal.

Justice Kathleen Caldwell & Dr. Mark Pearce, The Star 9 Comments [11/2/2018 12:03:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 140857

Only the ones with Drake in them are Uncharted games. Not that give-me-attention female bullshit. They REALLY went super ultra mega exceptional individual when they made that utter shit game. Women shouldn't be in any games or movies. They are just annoying pieces of useless shit.

Rainbow_Frag, Kiwi Farms 5 Comments [10/11/2018 3:52:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129329

Normies and Women ALWAYS Blame the Victim

They can never admit that they had a HUGE part to play in creating the "bitter" and "angry" incels they call us here - when they bullied, rejected and ostracized us in High School and made our lives a living hell whilst they were accepted, loved and got their needs met. Well, men are not born bitter and not born misogynists. Bitterness and woman hating only comes after years of ABUSE and MISTREATMENT.
They are so selfish and solipsistic they cant take responsibility and accountability for their nasty actions towards us. They ALWAYS blame us since they dont want to admit that they are SHIT HORRIBLE CRUEL NASTY SADISTIC human beings. They want to keep that fake image of perfection they put up on facebook and instagram by virtue signalling and pointing out how bitter incels are but forgot to mention we only became bitter due to the abuse we received from THEIR NASTY hands.

villelinde08, /r/incels 8 Comments [7/15/2017 10:50:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Menomaru
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 128750

Just ranting a bit...

Modern society, especially the creation of feminism, has made people extra crazy! Notice how the rise in mental illness coincides with the rise in modern feminism? Do you honestly think that's accidental or a coincidence?

Women are literally losing their minds trying to keep up with men on everything. And men are losing their minds too trying to accommodate them. What do you think has led to so much sexual confusion and gender incertitude?

Modern feminism has thrown everything into a quandary: women, men, families, homes, children, the economy, religion, politics, education, laws, government - everything.

Even the sports industry has been politicized with the fake women's rights issue! I get tired of tuning into the sports channel just to see the obligatory female personage sitting on a panel of men, like she's there to babysit the fellas: because after all, we're not allowed to have anything without women's permission, right? Not even sports!

And how exactly does that help women's equality anyway???

*Newsflash: Men tune into sports to get away from women - not to be smothered by them there too! It's our one little world away from feminism. At least until now.

Now we have athletes running around wearing pink sneakers and ribbons talking about breast cancer; regardless of the fact that most men suffer and die from prostate cancer; a type of cancer that women aren't even effected by. Society itself has gone mad!

But this is all a carefully orchestrated effort to award SINFUL women a superior - not equal status in society. And that's really the key - sin. Because godly women would find contentment with playing the role assigned to their gender by birth. A mass movement away from that is nothing short of social engineering on a demonic level! And behind this is something far more nefarious.

As society bends and caters to the class of women who covet after the perceived power that men have, society will continue to devolve into a state of utter degeneracy that threatens its very existence.

Mack Major, Facebook 10 Comments [7/2/2017 12:25:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Nietzsche Wannabe Award

Quote# 132900

They are nothing but worthless specks of dust that needs to be trampled on. They offer society nothing but burden, and have the nerve to demand stuff from society itself because they think they are entitled to it just because they have cunts. And what do they give back in return? Absolutely nothing. They only thing these creatures do give is, more bitching and moaning about how they are been oppressed thanks to the patriarchy.

Before feminism and all that useless femoid empowerment crap came into the mainstream, Incels like myself still had the chance to get a cum dumpsters of my own. Now, bitches think they deserve and are entitled to the very top percentage of men. Even though beta cucks won't admit it, most of them are in parasitic type relationships with useless femoids who have been either railed by Chad or Tyrone multiple times. A beef curtain wouldn't think twice to cheat on her average schmuck of a partner no matter how much good he has done to her. That's literally how heartless these cunts have become.

Every cunt out there deserves the hate. They are untamed beasts that needs to be controlled or put down -- I very much prefer the latter, to be honest. They need to go back to being happy with the role of being property to men. If not, they must prepare to face the consequences to their vile actions that has been so ignored through the years.

Lookismisreall, r/incels 12 Comments [10/12/2017 12:54:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh