Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In
Quote Search:
Fundie: Board:
Comment Search:
Author: Comment:
1 2 3 4 5 10 15
Quote# 100645

I'll be blunt. Prior to the neo-communist Magic Lawn Jockey lying and bullshitting his way into the People's House, and exploiting his skin color at every opportunity, I was not a racist,

Prior to the DemonicRATs saying that anyone who voted for McCain was a racist, I was not a racist.

Prior to the Kenyan-born Africoon brazenly flipping off McCain and HRC on camera, I was not a racist.

And then the "messiah" who promised that he would would bring racial reconciliation and harmony to America orchestrated an unending attack on anyone who dared to challenge him, invariably calling his critics racists.

The obsolete farm equipment appointed a consummate racist asshole as his Attorney General.

The Mississippi wind chime spent twenty years in the pews of the church of the brazenly, blatantly racist "Rev." Jeremiah Wright.

The Rottweiler's chew toy wrote a book, "Dreams of My Father", that is loaded with racism.

The homo-simian injected himself into a shooting in Florida, saying that if he had a son, he would look like the punk-ass darkie, Trayvon. Remember him?

The tree ornament is the most racist bastard who ever polluted the People's House. Because of him, the First Ho and his hyperleftist regime, I am now a racist.

And if I choose to use one or more of the various epithets that refer to the Kenyan porch monkey, that's my choice. Anyone who doesn't like it is invited to liplock on my 100% red-blooded American ass.

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 17 Comments [4/22/2014 3:03:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 100355

When the DemonicRATs/liberassholes oppose Voter ID laws, they are spitting in the faces of the minorities and sneering, "You are too fucking stupid and incompetent to perform a simple task such as getting an ID, so we will lie our asses off to you and pretend that we give a fuck about anything other than your mindless, robotic voting for DemonicRATs."

Were I one of those minorities, I'd be deeply offended by their condescension. The fact that there is no such expression of offense tells me that the RATs' opinion of the minorities is founded in fact. Maybe they ARE too stupid and ignorant to see through the liberals' contempt for them.

DoctorDoom, LibertyDwells 23 Comments [4/4/2014 3:34:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Elie

Quote# 100309

[DoctorDoom cites the anti-gay Lambda Report on Homosexual Activism to show that most gay males have hundreds of sexual partners.]

Another tedious teenage troll from the FISTED septic tank defecates on our doorstep.

The "error":

24 percent of gay men had over 100 partners
43 percent of gay men had over 500 partners
28 percent of gay men had over 1000 partners

As written, it is vague. However, it is safe to conclude that each line is based on the percentage of gay men referred to in the previous line, i.e.:

1. 24 percent of gay men had over 100 partners
2. 43 percent of the men in line 1 had over 500 partners
3. 28 percent of the men in line 2 had over 1000 partners

IAC, the promiscuity of the gay "lifestyle" is not only well known and described in many citations in post #8, but it is defended by the extremists.

"Now there is a move toward claiming that this (promiscuity) is part of a different, perhaps even superior, way of managing sexual relationships... The assumption that it is desirable to have frequent and varied sex partners is increasingly seen as a positive part of gay life style."
-- Dennis Altman, "The Homosexualization of America, The Americanization of the Homosexual, (NY: St. Martin's Press, 1982) pp. 16-7

Gay liberation was founded on a "sexual brotherhood of promiscuity", and "any abandonment of that promiscuity would amount to a communal betrayal of gargantuan proportions."
-- Rotello, G. (1997). Sexual Ecology: AIDS and the Destiny of Gay Men. NY: Dutton

A "lifestyle" that consists largely of random sexual encounters with strangers and "cruising" for blowjobs or butthumping has nothing whatever to recommend it. There is not a trace of feeling, let alone love, in the daily quest for the next orgasm. In the respect of endless lust for new "partners", it's not much different than the heterosexual equivalent. However, gay sexual behavior is by its nature more dangerous in a medical sense.

Come back when you get through puberty, kid.

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 35 Comments [4/1/2014 3:54:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 100038

The bastard is an avowed enemy of the United States whose entire reign as America's first king was a non-stop quest to destroy this country. It would not even remotely surprise me were he to board a plane for Kenya or wherever and publicly annouce that the "birthers" were right. It would be his final act of contempt and hatred for the nation that shamelessly kissed his mulatto ass.

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 10 Comments [3/18/2014 3:39:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 99975

The salient point is how many people are migrating TO liberal shitholes like New York, Mexifornia, Ohio, Michigan, etc.

The curse is that liberal asswipes move out of the cesspools that they created, resettle into less corrupt states, and then try desperately to turn those states into fucking clones of the ones that they left.

IMO, this crap won't stop until it becomes legal to shoot liberals.

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 40 Comments [3/15/2014 3:12:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 28
Submitted By: Elie

Ergo Proctologist Sum

Quote# 99358

Atheists are paradoxes, because they are their own gods. Ergo they deny their own existence.

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 50 Comments [2/14/2014 4:13:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 49

Quote# 99237

Here's how evowackos "debate".

• They use "science", "scientist" and/or "scientific" ar least five times in every grammatically incompetent sentence;
• They claim to be scientists/professors of science in prestigious institutions such as MIT, but their abysmal ignorance of science exposes them as teen trolls within a few posts;
• They are without exception pompous, arrogant, ignorant, contentious, insulting, brazen, shameless, and clueless;
• They are with few exceptions the first in an ev thread to raise the issue of faith and religion;
• They attack my Christianity and the Bible even though I have NEVER cited either in my incisive demolitions of their junk science;
• They accuse creationinists/ID advocates of being religious, but they worship Darwin and cite/quote TalkOrigins as their godless bible;
• They utterly refuse to address any scientifically sound rebuttal of their mythology;
• They universally insist that natural selection renders math and probabilities irrelevant and makes the impossible inevitable;
• They invariably cite consensus as their proof of evolutionism;
• They load their Plan-9-level bullshit with subjunctive-mode words/phrases such as "might have", "may have", "could have", "it is assumed", "it is thought", "it is supposed", "let us imagine", etcetera, and they have the balls to call that science;
• And on and on and on ad nauseam.

It would be refreshing to encounter one of the zit-popping little snot-eaters who actually attempted to debate rather than reciting their tedious mantras that we've all heard/read at least a hundred times.

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 35 Comments [2/8/2014 4:09:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 27
Submitted By: David

Quote# 99197

[The instant someone actually disproves evolution with solid proof, scientists will abandon it.]

Bullshit. Evolutionism isn't a science. It's a cultic, naturalistic religion that is zealously and mindlessly adhered to by people who are utterly terrified by the implications of the only alternative. They cannot disavow it because that would be an admission that they were wrong, and they will seek to destroy any "infidel" who strays from the fold of the pseudoscientific religion of Darwinism.

Ask any scientist about the dire professional and social consequences of daring to express doubt about the doctrines of the cult of evolutionism.

Evolutionism's "science" consists of drawing the curve and then plotting the points. It starts with the desired outcome and bends, warps, twists, tears and shreds the evidence to make it conform to their religion's dogmata. They ignore, suppress and censor any evidence that is not in lockstep with their cultic doctrines. They enforce exclusivity in academia by the power of the legislatures and the courts.

One would think that if the jackasses are so confident of their braying, they would relish the opportunity to confront creationists in a neutral venue so that they can once and for all dispense with those "Bible thumpers". Howeveer, they resolutely oppose any public debates with competent, informed creationists. Why? A: because each and every time they have tried it, they have lost the debate, usually decisively. ETBs are accustomed to controlling the setting, and when faced with a worthy opponent who is not cowed by their bullying tactics, they fold.

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 54 Comments [2/6/2014 4:25:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 36
Submitted By: David

Quote# 99041

[DoctorDoom's letter to the people at A&E over Duck Dynasty.]

Sent to the feedback email address...

Writing as a mature, responsible, self-respecting, self-controlled, Christian gay man, I strongly encourage you to reconsider the foolhardiness of "suspending" Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty because of the screeching and wailing of the mouthy, militant minority of the gay/lesbian community. You have done yourself no favors by catering to the strident, obnoxious, highly overrated handful of queer hyperactivists.

Was it for ratings? Have you asked yourselves where you are going to get enough gays to compensate for the loss of viewers that your obsequious submission to a few tantrum-throwing faggots (yes, the term is offensive, but no more so than they are) must certainly provoke?

Do you seriously believe that the regular viewers of Duck Dynasty appreciate your obvious obeisance? You know as well as I do that the bitching queers who led to your unwise decision have never watched the show and never will do so. IMO, this folly will reflect negatively on your Nielsens.

Far too many businesses fail to grasp that the high-profile thugs such as GLAAD do not represent the majority of gays/lesbians. Their aura of significance is generated by the fawning media and companies who give them far more relevance than they merit.

Penalizing Mr. Robertson for privately expessing a politically incorrect view in order to appease a microminority will prove to have been a major error of judgment. I for one hope that the entire cast walks out and leaves you with nothing to replace the show. And if these reports are true...

• A&E tampered with the show by bleeping words that were in no way offensive in order to give the impression that there were vile words spoken by Christians;
• A&E demanded that the name of Jesus not be used because it might "offend" Muslims, as though your Muslim viewership is even a blip on the Nielsens;

... you demonstrate that you are unworthy of having the show in your lineup.

Bob R

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 42 Comments [1/29/2014 4:33:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 30
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 99023

Evolution is a big lie perpetrated, not by autocrats or Big Brother, but by people who fancy themselves intellectual and scientific. Such beliefs prove one thing: intelligence is no guarantee of wisdom.

If the rest of this piece seems just a tad on the facetious, cynical side, it's simply because this writer has a hard time being serious while discussing such silliness as Darwinism. Nevertheless, where the context demands it, we will of course be properly pedantic.

A definition of evolution is in order: it is the theory that all life-forms evolved from lower forms, and in the beginning a single cell, which mysteriously appeared from non-living organic matter, was the great-great-etcetera-grandfather of all life. Everything evolved strictly by accident, random events, uncontrolled changes without logic or reason. There was no intelligence or purposefulness behind the staggering number of transitions that started with Cell One and wound up with ants and elephants and hummingbirds and oak trees and human beings, with frogs and philosophers.

To appreciate the absurdity of it, consider this mathematical trivia: if one of each letter from a Scrabble game is dropped in a pile and chosen at random, the probability of selecting them alphabetically, or in any other specified order, is 26 factorial, meaning 26 x 25 x 24 and so on. That comes out to one chance in a bit over 400 septillion (4 followed by 26 zeroes).


Now imagine, if you will, that the 3,568,489 letters of the King James Bible are spread out across a parking lot. A chimp is then assigned the job of picking up the letters and laying them in a row. Evolution's principle is that letter by letter the text of the Bible is perfectly reproduced.

Needless to say, the mathematical odds against accidental, uncontrolled evolution beginning with a single cell and ending with the diversity and disparity of life forms now on Earth are too enormous to even calculate. (It was estimated that the chance evolution of a horse involves odds of one in 10e60000, which is the technical way of saying 1 followed by 60,000 zeroes. Some odds!)

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 51 Comments [1/28/2014 4:19:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 34
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog
1 2 3 4 5 10 15