SSTDT Top 250!

Quote# 71305

My concern for level of pain of rape would be greater if it weren't for the fact that most American women deserve to raped because they oppose prostitution as a sexual outlet for men. Since they deserve to raped, I cannot concern myself with the pain rape causes them.

fschmidt, 248 Comments [3/4/2010 12:31:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 538
Submitted By: David

Quote# 80934

(Part of a much larger post)

Women do not "love" men ... women do not "love" their parents ... women do not "love" each other ... women do not even "love" their own children ... actually, women are totally INCAPABLE of "love". Even the ancients knew and wrote extensively about this unspoken truth. They are creatures whose sole purpose is self-preservation. Like the shark, they have small brains, no higher self/consciousness, no shred of humanity, and yet are masters of survival and have no enemies other than themselves.

Only men are capable of this concept we call "love" and this is a fact, when was the last time you heard of a woman jumping in front of someone to take a bullet for them?


Women think ONLY of themselves 24 hours a day 7 days a week in a rather narcissistic manner, and this mindset is NOT conducive to chemical reactions such as "love".

So guys, don't feel bad if women do not "appreciate" your "kindness", "love", or "personality" ... you are just dealing with a creature whose walnut-sized brain simply CANNOT process or reciprocate any of the things I just mentioned. That is all. The creature does not mean to "hurt" your feelings, what's happening is that your "kindness" simply does not register with it's ancient reptilian brain. It's nothing "personal" really.

In short ... It's not you, it's them

trogdor005, Men Going Their Own Way 311 Comments [5/1/2011 12:46:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 391
Submitted By: Silver Eyed Rigaldo

Quote# 81990

But, as the post title implies, the Edmonton Slutwalk girls have gone a step further. They are explicitly passing themselves off as sluts. This is fortunate, as it means that now we can start bringing the legal and moral force of society to bear upon them. To re-iterate:
Every woman marching in the Edmonton Slut Walk is publicly declaring herself a slut. This means every woman there desires sex with any and all partners. Any sexual activity you initiate with them comes with implied consent. They cannot say no, and if they do understand all their 'no's mean yes. They are all asking for it. They want it bad. Now. From you. Go get 'em!

Now if you disagree, if you think that's not what this is about at all, then two things come to mind:

1. If a bunch of women stand on the street claiming that they are shoe shiners, and they refuse to shine your shoes, you not only have a false advertising charge you can lay on them, but also discriminatory business practices. Women claiming to be nymphomaniacs who can't get enough may just find themselves having to explain why they are so prudish.
2. By their own admission, they are lying bitches. The worst kind of woman. All marching on the street. Together.

If your wife is one of them, I'm very very sorry. Maybe a good rape might make her a little more manageable around the house.

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child, The Third Edge of the Sword 165 Comments [6/16/2011 3:49:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 388
Submitted By: David

If you still have any faith in humanity, do not read

Not joking, skip it, hit the next one, it's just that nasty.

Quote# 97021

But pedophiles who pay children for sex are not really rapists, because the child consents, then performs the act, indicating they understand the nature of the contract. The elder is still a pedophiles, but the child prostitute is still a prostitute.

If the child is enslaved – it’s rape, or too young or stupid to know what he or she’s doing – rape. But poor, and in need of food? Not rape. A choice. Unwilling to do other hard labour paying 9 times less than the prostitution route? Not rape. A choice.

I think there are a too few prostitute feminists on this blog who will do anything to perpetuate the tax-free lifestyle prostitutes are currently legally entitled to in most places.

Prostitution tax avoidance and accountability avoidance opportunities need to be shut down.
If a grown woman would make the argument she’s a prostitute due to being victim of circumstance, then a child will be encouraged to make the same argument. Set a better example.

Whatever your age, follow the golden rule, of never taking money for sex, then prostitution will be eradicated. Only the prostitute can stop charging for sex.

And of course, that means rejecting courtship gifts, engagement gifts, marriage gifts, divorce gifts, and government largess also.

I don’t think many of you are ready to renounce prostitution in all its forms.

It’s such a simple course of action – but manboobzers will conspire to make it seem ridiculous, unquantifiable, un-knowable and so on.

I know a whore when I see one.

Tom Martin, manboobz 149 Comments [10/13/2013 5:27:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 369

Quote# 109504

Q: At what age should a harlot start to be corrected? Is a harlot ever too young to rape?

A: As soon as she’s old enough to be a harlot, you should start correcting her. 9 – 15 is usually the ideal age to start correcting harlots, but no harlot is too young to correct. These days, harlots are getting younger and younger. So, if you see a 6-year-old dressed like a harlot, feel free to rape her. Remember: all harlots are equally deserving of rape.

The Philosophers of Rape, The Philosophy of Rape 142 Comments [6/11/2015 2:09:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 308

Quote# 71770

A penis is a fucking weapon… and I AM a mother of 3 sons! My youngest is 5 and I can tell you, I never allow the older teen boys to bathe him, sleep in the same bed with him, see him naked, sit on their laps, babysit, wrestle or any interaction that involve more than a hug. Do I think my older sons will rape him? In my heart no ,but in my mind I know it can happen because they have a fucking penis and a penis is a weapon. Might sound harsh to some but my job is to protect my kids even from each other. I was the same way when the older boys were younger… no staying over friends house were there are older boys or men. No staying over my brother’s house( my brother loves them and in my heart I know he would not hurt them, but he also has a penis which is a fucking weapon. Only female doctors. Never fully trust any man with a penis. Not their father, uncles, teachers … no one.

I cannot even fathom how vigilant I would have been if my children were females.

Rose, aroomofourown 209 Comments [3/30/2010 3:51:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 294

Quote# 84101

I don't believe I could recommend this as a strategy for most men, but it is surely educational to learn that raping and killing a woman is demonstrably more attractive to women than behaving like a gentleman. And women, before all the inevitable snowflaking commences, please note that there is absolutely nothing to argue about here. It is an established empirical fact.

I would go so far to argue that if you are being introduced to a woman you find attractive, she will be more attracted to you if you slap her in the face without warning and walk away without explanation than if you smile and tell her that you are very pleased to meet her. Now this, being a mere hypothesis, can be argued. And tested, if you're feeling especially scientific this weekend.

[Emphasis added]

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 202 Comments [10/3/2011 3:02:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 287
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 70784

The very first human intercourse was a rape, women have a hymen. Every intercourse after that is still a "rape" because women still have hymens. Women are not supposed to be poked by men, they were all lesbians until one day a freak of nature was born and he got saddled with "God". All men are women first when they develop in the womb, they just have overgrown clits. Female ejaculation contains trace amounts of semen and that's how the ancient female reproductive system reproduced before men "raped" them.

In essence, all sex is rape. Am I going to complain? No, I have a gun to shoot down any "rapist" that enters my home.

Bricktop, AWE 124 Comments [2/19/2010 1:56:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 283
Submitted By: ixolite

Quote# 72877

really sad that womyn got to be this way, it was better a few decades ago... at this point I honestly think a husband needs to be legally allowed to hit his wife once in a while when she misbehaves, it's hard coded in womyn's DNA that a strong man worthy of respect will hit her and severely scold her whenever she tries messing with him, in the end they love their husband a lot more for it... they subconsciously want to be hit and be told to shut up... sad that feminists have screwed this up because it only means that womyn will do all kind of nasty shit that will go completely unchecked and they think they're entitled to it

this is what happens in every third world country, and marriages are really stable there, because the man is the true chief of the family and he is allowed to be a man... this is the un-politically correct truth

Mesian, 237 Comments [5/13/2010 1:51:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 278
Submitted By: David

Quote# 78607

My rape advocacy is twofold. Two aspects of feminism currently independently justify rape, in my view: 1. equality and 2. feminist corruption of justice. Feminist rape law reform has more than blurred the distinction between rape and consensual sex. In many circumstances it no longer matters in the eyes of the law whether we actually rape a woman or not -- she can regret sex in any case and have us convicted of "rape." The law quite explicitly states that mere negligence is enough to be a rapist even if you had no evil intentions. So why should men care if we rape or not? Women don't respect us anymore, so why should we respect women? Hate breeds hate. I have followed the deterioration of justice closely throughout my life, and my heart has been filled with deeper hatred at every step of feminist legal reform. False rape is now institutionalized. At this point, I don't believe Norwegian women are morally entitled to protection from rape.

Eivind Berge, Eivind Berge's Blog 208 Comments [1/12/2011 7:13:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 266
Submitted By: Honky McCracker

Quote# 72850

The first question any sane, self-loving woman would ask upon realizing that the vast majority of males are rapists is how to keep these rapists away from girls and women. The fact that so many women instead ask how to keep the males from being rapists is a manifestation of feminine masochism.

Margaret, A Room of Our Own 164 Comments [5/10/2010 8:51:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 248
Submitted By: Boy Wonder

Quote# 73179

As I predicted you like banging the rape drum. Yes, I know that rape is bad but you have to admit that there are a lot of worse things, like terminal disease, loss of a limb, or despair. I know it’s humiliating but when it’s over it’s over, not like cancer.

Yes, a Christian woman suffers less from rape than another woman. Are you asking me if I think rapists should go after Christian women? Well if they do they will be faced with the strength and will of the Lord and may even come to His side when they see how little their pathetic abuse can do to a woman of faith!

No you didn’t misunderstand about why rape is a sin. It makes no sense for it to be a sin for a man to rape his wife since a man can’t rape his wife. It’s just not logical, like stealing your own car or pocking your own pocket.

Maybe you got raped and enjoy harping on it. Well the whole world doesn’t revolve around you. Get over it, clear your head and come to God. [Emphasis added]

Censored One, IAmAnAtheist 130 Comments [5/25/2010 9:50:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 242
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 80416

First, there is no such thing as marital rape. Once consent is formally given in public ceremony, it cannot be revoked; the form in which marital consent is revoked is well-established. It is called divorce. This isn't a religious issue, although many on both sides will attempt to view it that way, it's a simple matter of when consent is revocable and the specific form that revocation must take. I invite those who believe that consent may always be granted and revoked at will to consent to join the U.S. Army, then attempt to withdraw their consent. That should serve to clarify the matter for them; one hopes they will enjoy their extended holiday in Afghanistan. The attempt to create a legal concept of "marital rape" is no less than an attempt to destroy the basic concept of marriage. If the husband or the wife has no more claim to the spouse's body than anyone else, then the marital vows are meaningless and the marriage is a charade. Once consent is withdrawn, the marriage has ended.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 140 Comments [4/3/2011 6:17:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 232

Quote# 64100

If a law forces rapists to marry their victims, then perhaps the number of rapes will decline to near zero. What’s more, if the law requires rapists to pay fifty shekels of silver to the father, this could indeed equate to the death penalty if the rapist hasn’t saved toward his bride’s future. Thus, we have narrowed down the field of rapists who marry their victims to only those who have saved for their “brides” future. If the girl happens to be ugly, he is required to marry her anyway. Again, this stipulation will help narrow the field further since potential rapists will be motivated to think before acting. Thirdly, if one “selects” his wife through means of rape, then he’ll never be able to divorce her even if “she” turns out to be a transvestite. The law is putting so many roadblocks into the potential rapist’s path, and causing him to think, I would guess most potential rapists would opt for the easier path of waiting for a willing partner. Thus, such a society could easily exceed the American society in quality by many fold.

[Bold mine]

Alan Clarke, Debunking Christianity  186 Comments [7/16/2009 10:57:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 221
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 74451

And what is that difference? Interestingly I'm actually discussing rape with another new poster as well. . . since the difference between rape and domination is 'consent', what gives consent? Attraction, just with animals and their mating rituals of sexual display - if you are attractive, good sperm, then it's not rape.

e_i-2, 184 Comments [7/13/2010 6:36:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 219
Submitted By: Letipex

Quote# 92007

About the gang-rape of a 23 year old woman in India

"The spiritual leader’s remarks could be paraphrased thus: Those who were at fault were drunk. Had she taken guru diksha and chanted the Saraswati Mantra, she would not have boarded any random bus after watching a movie with her boyfriend. Even if she did, she should have taken God’s name and asked for mercy.

She should have called them brothers, fallen at their feet and pleaded for mercy. Had she said, “I am a weak woman, you are my brothers”, such brutality would not have happened.

The self-proclaimed godman also said he was against harsher punishments for rape accused as such laws could be misused."

Asaram Bapu, The Hindu 49 Comments [1/11/2013 4:02:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 205
Submitted By: erlando

Quote# 64976

Forcing a wife to have sex is not rape as her body already belongs to her husband.

nick, Y!A 144 Comments [8/19/2009 5:23:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 199

Quote# 70160

Considering the hell men have to go through in the feminised world today where everything is skewed to favour women in all areas of life, but especially in the dating scene, then the new system would have to be one which would quickly and swiftly reverse the damage done to our societies by the incessant terrorism of men by feminism and it's policies propped p by governments and institutions. So I'd propose of system of male choice in the dating game. All I'd recommend is one law and one law only with regards to male-female relationships. No matter what a man says to or asks of a woman, a woman cannot say no. A no from a woman could be reported as easily to the Police as a current day rape, and would also be punishable by a jail sentence.

Call me a misogynist, or call me angry from perceived mistreatment of ordinary men under the hammer of feminism, but it's the only way for society to make up for years of torment and give ordinary men not only the chance to date a woman without the fear of ever hearing a no, but also the chance to date out of their league and the chance to produce better-looking offspring.

A woman saying no to a man under the new system could be classed as equivalent to raping the man. You may think this is misoginist and harsh, but wake up guys, ugly men are going to prison daily in feminised countries for even looking at women, when the women will claim is that she was raped, only in actual fact to only be looked at by the wrong type of guy for her in the wrong way.

The only system that would work is one where the dating minefield would be pushed to the female side of the battleground.

Coby, 203 Comments [2/18/2010 3:38:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 192
Submitted By: David

Quote# 73126

Rape is equality

When men have something women have less of, such as money or power, women simply take it by force. It's called affirmative action and feminists believe it's right. I am not going to argue against that. I accept that as a lost cause. So instead I am going to embrace forced equality and demand it for men as well.

What women have that men don't is of course sex. If anyone doubts that sex is a female resource, go here and request the PDF file Baumeister, R.F. & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339-363.

In light of feminism, or if you believe in equality, this article makes such a compelling case for rape that Baumeister felt obliged to include the otiose disclaimer, "Our analysis should in no way be construed as excusing sexual coercion and we roundly condemn any such acts."

So let us give women equality if that's what they really want. Remember that due to the hypergamous nature of women, men get less sex as women get more money and power. Women are generally incapable of feeling attraction for men who are not better than they are, and soon men are no better than equal. So it is about time men in feminist countries such as Norway stop thinking of rape as wrong. I have previously argued this point e.g. here as Arpagus, and no one has been able to justify why affirmative action is right when it benefits women and hurts men but is wrong when it helps men and hurts women.

Arpagus, Eivind Berge's Blog  244 Comments [5/24/2010 7:24:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 192
Submitted By: acooper

Quote# 71363

[After all, there are a lot studies about the rapist striving for the humiliation of the victim and demonstrating his or her power over the victim.]

This is simply liberal feminist propaganda. Feminist cannot except the truth that rape is quite simply about filling a biological need. Feminists much prefer this myth which is designed to demonize rapists.

fschmidt, 126 Comments [3/6/2010 2:08:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 190
Submitted By: David

Quote# 93114

Captain Beagle: Which is worse, work or rape? I know 2 women who were raped. Go fuck yourself #sorrynicepplhadtohearthat

VD: Hey, talk to @johnscalzi not me. I certainly didn't rape them.

Captain Beagle: no your article suggested an increase in rapes was less harmful than women handing out resumes. Insensitive & absurd

VD: I didn't suggest it, I proved it. By what metric do you claim that rape is more harmful to society than women working?

Captain Beagle: I was unaware one needed statistical data to prove rape is harmful.

VD: You need something, at any rate. What is your basis for claiming rape is worse for society than female employment?

Captain Beagle: thanx for this fascinating study in hyperbolic misogyny. I'm thinking of using you as the template for my next villain.

Vox Day, Vox Populi 77 Comments [3/14/2013 3:46:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 178

Quote# 70215

Rape is a complete and total fabrication. It never happens. There's no such thing as bad sex. There's bad people, but not bad sex.. I don't see how pounding someone in the ass when they don't want to have it can be seen as so horrible, but meanwhile these same people kill babies and leave their husbands on the drop of a dime.

Demonman, Argue With Everyone 77 Comments [2/10/2010 6:11:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 173
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 79126

Congresscunt Giffords will probably survive being shot in the head, according to medical reports currently available. She will likely suffer some life long brain damage from the injury to her brain, but when the victim is a leftist feminist female, how can you tell? Her husband is a NASA astronaut. She should have been home taking care of her husband's house and family instead of risking her life promoting radical socialist causes and amnesty for illegal aliens. The proper place for females is in the private sphere of house, home, and family. The proper place for females is not in the public sphere of politics. If she lives, the Governor of Arizona will not be able to appoint a man to replace her in Congress. Another tragedy. Maybe she will retire.

Bob Allen, The World According to Bob 101 Comments [1/31/2011 4:42:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 172
Submitted By: JohnTheAtheist

Quote# 89899

I can't go so far as to support rape, I still think it's wrong and should be punished, but I like that women need to live in fear of rape. I like that I have found an issue that the mere mention of can reduce most Feminists to tears. If you want to cause pain to a woman, make a joke about rape. I will be sure to do this more in my own life.

In some spats I had with females during the years, I wonder if they mistakingly took my belligerent attitude as being a threat of rape, which I didn't intend, as opposed to just the threat of violence, which was the effect I was going for.

In conclusion: rape is funny

Otis, Anti-Womens Coalition 84 Comments [11/4/2012 5:00:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 171

Quote# 84669

She Obeys Without Reference to Her Feelings About the Will of God

The Scriptures say a woman must ignore her “feelings” about the will of God, and do what her husband says. She is to obey her husband as if he were God Himself. She can be as certain of God’s will, when her husband speaks, as if God had spoken audibly from Heaven!


What If a Husband Expressly Commands Something Explicitly Wrong?

When women ask me this question, I counter with two of my own:

1) “Have you been living in daily obedience to your husband as part of your wholehearted, loving submission to God?”

(This is an essential part of the problem. If a woman has not been submissive, God has no responsibility for her situation and cannot be blamed if her husband requires something wrong.)

2) “Has your husband ever actually commanded you to do something wrong?”

In the hundreds of times I have asked these questions, not once, if my memory is right, has a woman answered, “Yes, I am always obedient, and yet my husband has required me to break one of God’s laws.”

Never! Why?

Because, when a woman takes God at His word, submits to her husband without reservation, fears God and loves Him, then God takes upon Himself the responsibility to see that a woman does not have to sin!


Don’t I Have Any Rights?

Can you find a Kleenex somewhere and mop up the tears, just for a minute, long enough to talk to me about what your rights really are?

You don’t have any rights, no rights at all. You lost them on the day you rebelled against God. You lost them, not because you are a woman, but because you are a sinner, just as I am.

Elizabeth Rice Handford, No Longer Quivering 81 Comments [11/5/2011 8:58:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 169

Quote# 84582

I recently took a long trip for work and spent a lot of hours in the air. One of my fellow passengers really stood out in my mind: a 20-something lass a few rows ahead of me. She is a natural-born beauty in that “launch a thousand ships” kind of way – slim, near-perfect symmetrical features, piercing blue eyes, and a shapely body. She is, simply, stunning. But there’s more to this story than a retired soldier admiring an exquisite example of female flesh young enough to be my daughter.

It was actually her tattoo that first caught my attention.

She was wearing a low-slung top that revealed a HUGE eagle inked across her chest and extending down under the front of her shirt. And then I noticed her hair – what little there was of it. I’ve always kept my hair short, even by military standards, and her hair was shorter than mine. Few things de-feminize a woman more than buzzing off her hair, which is why it is considered to be shameful in many societies. She was wearing ratty, ripped jeans and far too much costume jewelry. And then I noticed the piercings. As I stood six inches behind her for several minutes waiting to de-plane I counted seven, and that was just what was visible. I wondered what else she had done to herself. A tramp-stamp is a given, but who knows what other “body art” was hidden out of my view[...]

I asked myself what would cause the stunningly-beautiful young woman on my flight – at the height of her Sexual Market Value – to do that to herself? Women dress for us, so what does she intend for us to infer? I’m easy? I’m rebellious? I can drink you under the table?

I can think of no message that her chosen facade would convey that would be in her long-term interest. In a few years after her looks fade she is likely to be just another tatted-up skank wondering where the good men are.

It didn’t have to be this way. In a different social environment a woman like her would have learned to be (gasp!) feminine. She would have observed the older women in her surroundings and absorbed benevolent patriarchy in the air she grew up breathing. With her beauty she could have married above her economic station and lived a comfortable life. We can’t know if she would have been happy, but she almost certainly would have had stability, security and comfort. But she doesn’t live in that society; she lives in a “Slut Walk” society, thanks to feminism. When she chose the “Suicide Girl” look nobody stopped her. Now she has mutilated herself with enough ink and metal trinkets to repel the kind of man most likely to give her the life she wants, because no matter what she does to the outside of her body, she will eventually want what women have always wanted on the inside – stability, security and comfort.

The fruits of feminism: what a waste.

Lyn87, The Spearhead 146 Comments [11/6/2011 4:04:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 169

Quote# 86356

The “broken windows” theory of crime:

The basic insight of the “broken windows” theory is that serious crime is kept low when petty crime such as vandalism is kept down. Lesser crimes leave the way open for greater crimes. At least that is my reading of it.

How does this remind me of handling a wife? Like this. As a husband, I have found that arguing with my wife about her “lesser crimes” seems to prevent worse “crimes”. I think women are - ”given an inch” – inclined to “take an ell”. That is, they will behave about as badly as you allow them to. If you argue with the missus about how long her skirts should be, you will not be arguing with her about whether she should wear skirts in the first place. If you are like me, and you prefer your wife not to wear pants (trousers), this is a better argument to have than one about skirts vs pants.

Likewise, if you remonstrate with her about the quality of her meals, you will not be arguing about whether she should cook at all.

Or if you complain that something she wears out looks tarty, you will not be arguing about whether she should flirt or not. Or, more seriously, if you argue and complain about her flirting, you are less likely to find yourself arguing about whether you should have an “open marriage”.

So, punish and deal with the minor crimes, to prevent the major crimes. Deal with broken windows, lest you have to deal with arson.

A wife will test the boundaries. Set them narrow. Don’t let her do outrageous things without any complaint from you, because she will eventually test you and go too far, and then it will be too late.

The same applies to children.

If you are a husband who wants to be an effective head of the house, this is something to keep in mind.

David Collard, Social Biology 84 Comments [3/8/2012 4:40:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 166

Quote# 80197

What Has Feminism Really Done To Us?

God presents Himself in Scripture as male. He wants us to know Him in this way. He sent His SON (not daughter) to die for us. The intent of the Feminists is obvious. They wish first to destroy gender difference in our human relations and then to feminize the very nature of how God presents Himself to our sense.

But other areas are as important:

To maintain sanity, we need to return language to common usage.

We have policemen and policewomen. Policewoman implies, by her physical weakness up against a man, that she is physically less. If there is a burglar in your house, you don’t want to hear the dispatcher say “we’re sending the policewoman right out”!

We have pilots and pilotesses. If the plane is in trouble and the hydraulic system is out (which will require massive male strength to get the plan down), you don’t want to hear “this is the pilotess speaking, and I can’t control, with my limited upper body strength, this plane any longer”!!!

If you’re on the roof of a burning building, you don’t want to hear the little voice of a firewoman holler “jump, I’ll catch you”!

Walter Schneider, Fathers For Life 121 Comments [3/24/2011 8:15:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 162
Submitted By: WickedWitch

Quote# 87762

How does throwing acid in their faces when they demand independence from men benefit women?

Because female independence is strongly correlated with a whole host of social ills. Using the utilitarian metric favored by most atheists, a few acid-burned faces is a small price to pay for lasting marriages, stable families, legitimate children, low levels of debt, strong currencies, affordable housing, homogenous populations, low levels of crime, and demographic stability.

How do honor killings benefit women?

Because female promiscuity and divorce are strongly correlated with a whole host of social ills, from low birth and marriage rates to high levels of illegitimacy.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 104 Comments [6/11/2012 3:35:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 161

Quote# 84872

The stay-at-home-daughters movement, which is promoted by Vision Forum, encourages young girls and single women to forgo college and outside employment in favor of training as “keepers at home” until they marry. Young women pursuing their own ambitions and goals are viewed as selfish and antifamily; marriage is not a choice or one piece of a larger life plan, but the ultimate goal. Stay-at-home daughters spend their days learning “advanced homemaking” skills, such as cooking and sewing, and other skills that at one time were a necessity -- knitting, crocheting, soap- and candle-making. A father is considered his daughter’s authority until he transfers control to her husband.

Doug Phillips, Vision Forum 102 Comments [11/21/2011 4:15:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 158
Submitted By: PK

Quote# 89104

Slapping a girl across the face isn’t just about hurting her, it’s a kind of neg. It says, “I can crush you like an insect, but you aren’t worth the effort.” It’s a tacit acknowledgment that she’s weaker than you, beneath you, and if she crosses you again, you’ll put her in the hospital. You treat her like she’s a child throwing a temper tantrum, not an equal.

Like I said already, you should NOT hit women, not unless you want to end up in jail. But the principle still stands. Women should be terrorized by their men; it’s the only thing that makes them behave better than chimps.

Ferdinand Bardamu, Manosphere Copies 101 Comments [8/21/2012 3:45:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 158

Quote# 85149

Taking a belt to his daughter’s rear isn’t criminal, it isn’t anti-biblical, and it shouldn’t be condemned. If the wife stepped out of line he should be free to have her bend over and take a few whacks on the ass as well. A lot of times women get out of line and even the so-called “adult” women are often just children in adult bodies, they sometimes need discipline. For the most part they seem to crave it, they act in a fashion that they know SHOULD provoke a physical response from a healthy/sane male and then when that response doesn’t occur they get upset and begin pushing more and more to see what they can get away with.

If your wife spends more money than you told her she was allowed to spend, she is basically testing you, she is begging you to get tough with her, lay down the law, and be a man. Women won’t, don’t, and probably cannot respect a pushover man, they want a take charge man. Steinem once remarked, “we are becoming the men we wanted to marry” maybe so, but men are becoming the women of old and that doesn’t appeal to women, modern women or women at any other time. If your wife steps out of line and spends more than you told her she could spend, you have her bend over the table and take her belting/paddling like a big girl. Maybe for a lot of women it wouldn’t even be a negative thing.

What does modern society expect us to do, roll over and apologize that the woman was acting unruly and out of line? I say you paddle her ass and see where things go from there (more likely than not she’ll beg you to mount her right then and there).

Bryan, The Spearhead 101 Comments [12/10/2011 6:13:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 157

Quote# 81647

[On why young girls should dress modestly]

For example,
I knew of a man, his wife recently died. He had never touched anyone but his wife, sexually. Never ever thought of a child. But there was a neighbor who allowed her little girls to hang around the man. They wore tank tops and shorts. The old man asked if the girls could clean for him. He offered to pay them. They came over once or twice a week. Within a month into this, he started 'touching' them.
..Fortunately, the girls told their mother very soon and it didn't go any further, but the old man had never done it before, nor did he ever do it again.

The man became tempted by them, their vulnerability, their skin.

Rhomphaia (Sword) , queenqueequeg 91 Comments [6/1/2011 4:05:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 155
Submitted By: AtroposHeart

Quote# 81249

If all this is true, what are these women protesting? As I said, they are frightened. There is such a thing as rape, and they cannot process that reality. They have no way of understanding or making sense of it – and so they protest against it, hoping that outrage alone will make it go away. They want a world in which rape does not occur. Such a thing is not possible. However, there is a way to gain safety. A woman can protect herself against rape not by staging protests, especially protests defending sluttiness, but by earning the protection of good men. Men protect women against men. The sensible woman’s path in a dangerous world is to earn the protection of good men.

Laura, The Thinking Housewife 114 Comments [5/13/2011 3:48:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 155
Submitted By: Silver Eyed Rigaldo

Quote# 85150

These verses [1 Corinthians 7] show clearly that there is an obligation to have sex, never a right to not have sex. This is where the old term, the “marriage debt” comes from. It is a debt owed by both parties to the other. And withholding of sex is defrauding the partner. This is not regarded by the Church traditionally as a small matter, or unimportant. Rather if a wife defrauds her husband by not submitting and giving him sex when he desires it, she has committed a mortal sin.

For those not familiar with the term, a mortal sin is a grave offense not only against the marriage partner, but against God Himself. And, without confessing the sin, doing penance, and agreeing that it will not happen again, the woman will lose her soul and be consigned to hell.

So, we see how serious the sex obligation is for both husband and wife. These are debts and obligations agreed to and taken upon each other by the vows of marriage. The idea of marital rape is asinine and ridiculous. It only shows how far we have gotten from a real conception of marriage.

The woman has not power over her body, but her husband. Where is the wiggle room for marital rape here? There is none whatsoever. The very development of this anti-Christian concept shows that we must remove the State from marriage and restore true marriage with its vows and obligations – otherwise there is no marriage at all, only a farce masquerading under the false name of “marriage” to deceive men into its clutches.

Peter, The Spearhead 94 Comments [12/10/2011 6:13:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 154

Quote# 65201

[Concerning a bill in the Bahamas to outlaw marital rape]

"It is ridiculous for them to try to make that a law, because I don't think a man can rape his own wife. After two people get married, the Bible says that they become one – one flesh. How is it possible to rape what is yours?"

"Even if a woman says no to her husband it still can't be considered rape because she is his wife. He already paid his dues at the church and she already said 'I do,' so from then on, even if [a man] forces sex on his wife, it isn’t rape"

Pemmie Sutherland and Elvis Russell, The Bahama Journal 68 Comments [9/1/2009 9:58:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 154
Submitted By: Comhradh

Quote# 74530

Sheik Hilali, Australia's Mufti since 1989, was quoted as saying: "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the back yard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem."

He added: "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab [Islamic headscarf], no problem would have occurred."

The Egyptian-born Sheik also appeared to refer to a series of notorious gang rapes in Sydney by a group of Lebanese Muslim men who received long prison sentences. He said there were women who "sway suggestively", and wore make-up and immodest dress, "and then you get a judge without mercy [who] gives you 65 years... but the problem all began with who?"

Sheik Taj Aldin al-Hilali, The Independent 113 Comments [7/21/2010 9:30:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 151
Submitted By: Malkyrian

Quote# 73844

It would seem justifiable from this understanding that a natural law exists, where women should never make more than men. We cannot encourage a healthy dating environment, or in fact any dating whatsoever if a woman's status is institutionally raised above a man's. I remember my mother telling me when she worked for a Japanese accounting firm that all the males were paid far more than women, because management knew men had to support families, while women just blew their own money on shopping. Sadly businesses like these are a thing of the past. We live in an era that doesn't acknowledge the natural role of hypergamy.

It's for this reason that I think women should be paid less. In reality I'd speculate many women want to be paid less and have a breadwinner take care of them. But women just wanna have their cake and eat it too. They want to be infinitely successful, yet only date men who are more successful than them. If someone was to force lower pay on them and increase their male co-workers pay overnight, I imagine many lonely suitors would suddenly be swarming in attractive signals from their formerly equally paid female co-workers. It's almost as though monetary status can change a man from a "3" to a "7".

drealm, Love-Shy 205 Comments [6/20/2010 3:06:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 151
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 78376

If our great-grandmothers would arrive at a modern Christian school girls' basketball game, they would recoil in the horror as they would watch physically developed girls running around in brief outfits that expose their thighs and bouncing bosoms to the lustful eyes of any man wishing to look. Moreover, they would be shocked as they would see girls trying to "kill the opponent," yell, scream, fight, and in general, act in every way like a man.
Whatever happened to girls who studied to have a servant spirit and to be quiet, meek, demure, and shame faced? How are we training our girls to be meek, quiet, and submissive wives by encouraging them to "win at all costs," knock over your opponent if necessary, be loud, froward, and physical, while being dressed immodestly and while acting in a very masculine manner? Just because the world encourages these qualities in their daughters, must God's people do the same? Is it any wonder many girls from Christian backgrounds consider motherhood and being a housewife as being unfulfilling, a bore, unexciting, and beneath their dignity.

Moreover, many of these sports heroines have developed such boldness and forwardness from their sports activities, that they disdain the traditional and Biblical role of women. To such a girl, the Biblical mandate to be in submission to her husband and to even reverence him (Ephesians 5:24, 33) is outdated and unrealistic. She instead finds the raucous demands of "feminists" and the women's liberation crowd more to be her liking. After all, marriage is a 50/50 proposition is it not? She thinks to herself " I have just as much say around here as he does don't I?"

When such a girl marries, she is so quick and eager to establish "fairness" in her marriage, that she finds her marriage ending up in frustration, disillusionment and divorce.

Ronald E. Williams, 109 Comments [12/31/2010 9:27:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 150
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 87818

["PIV" means "penis-in-vagina (intercourse)" among radical feminists.]

Well, PIV is natural for animals because they have hormonal drives which pushes them to copulate at given times, either during estrus or at given seasons, according to their biological needs. Since they copulate only when their nature/body tells them to, it can’t be rape in my opinion.

Humans on the other hand have no pre-ordained sexuality: there’s nothing in the human body that pushes us to copulate at any given time, we don’t have any hormonal drives during estrus that forces us to seek a mate for PIV and it’s not part of our basic and necessary body functions/needs like peeing or breathing. sexuality is completely social and learned. It’s been seen on some adults who’ve never learned about PIV not to know “how to make a baby” and it didn’t cross their minds to do PIV. PIV isn’t natural but socially institutionalised by men through compulsory heterosexuality, marriage and rape. It certainly isn’t a recreative practice either since men use it as a *weapon* against women to control them – and it IS a weapon of war given the harm it causes women. And as Feuerwerferin says, PIV isn’t even necessary for reproduction since sperm on the vulva is enough to cause pregnancy. Plus the trauma-bonding (trauma = survival mechanism to something wrong being done to you = that something needs to stop). Plus the fact that having something the size of an erect penis thrust into your body with a naked man all over you is in itself deeply invasive despite the genital stimulation that is most often just reactive or mechanically activated after years of grooming and is usually only triggered after some first seconds of pain. (PAIN!! that’s a normal body sign telling something’s *wrong!*). without counting that at the beginning of PIV grooming it’s most often just painful, irksome, or at best there’s not much sensation, and the girl usually feels she *has* to do it because she’s already groomed to believe her value lies in being fucked by men.

Anyway, these are many reasons that make me say PIV is in no way a natural human practice, and that women’s vagina isn’t meant to be penetrated at all, but only meant to expel a baby.

witchwind, Radfem Hub 102 Comments [6/14/2012 3:35:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 149
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 86891

The dictionary defines rape as forced sexual relations against a person's will. By this definition it is possible for a man to rape his wife. However, given Paul's statements, it should not be against a wife's will to have sex with her husband. Therefore, if such an event happens, sin rests with the wife who is resisting fulfilling her duty in marriage. Sin also lies with the husband who is forcing sexual relations. Spousal rape is not a case where only one person is guilty of a sin.

Jeffrey W Hamilton, Lavista Church of 84 Comments [4/13/2012 2:31:32 PM]
Fundie Index: 136

Quote# 94293

[On warrior women in fantasy]

Has Phony ever hit a woman? Has he ever seen a woman's head snap back, seen her knees buckle, and stood over her as she lays crumpled on the floor? Has he ever bloodied a woman's nose or blackened a woman's eyes? Has he ever toyed with a woman desperately trying to lay a hand on him before stepping forward and flattening her with a single jab?

I have. It wasn't even amusing because it was so easy. I had a harder time fighting a well-trained eleven year old boy. I wasn't even throwing any combinations or throwing my strikes at more than half-force, and that was still enough to lay them out. If you are a man who hasn't ever hit a woman in the face, or if you are a woman who hasn't ever been beaten up by a man, your opinion on the subject is guaranteed to be irrelevant. The cumulative difference in speed, strength, and mass simply has to be experienced to be believed.

I sincerely encourage anyone who wishes to write about women warriors to visit a full-contact dojo and ask to spar a few rounds with the opposite sex. They will accommodate you and it will be an eye-opening experience.

Vox Day, Vox Populi 137 Comments [5/13/2013 3:36:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 130

Quote# 74011

Liberal women have been afforded only one real right by liberals. The right to kill their offspring.
Liberal women are almost always overweight, blowzy, baggy eyes, mannish, and make sure their hair hasn't been washed in months. They do this because they think it makes them appear more intellectual. After all, a woman has to be like a man to get anywhere. The libs are about as bad as the Taliban. The lib is so archaeic that they still buy into the old belief that a pretty woman is always stupid.

Yes, they are jealous because the conservative woman is truly liberated. They are smart, proud to be good looking and can even do things men do and still be feminine and sexually attractive. The conservative woman can even have her baby with pride and do not see it as a burden.

indylindy, Free Republic 102 Comments [6/24/2010 3:59:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 123
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 88543

These are merely five of the many semi-unknown female heroes of the past few years. I listed them in the order in which I admired their courage and actions - meaning, that they are from greatest to least. But, that is not to say that I don’t admire them all. I respect all of these women for their courage, strength, resolve, and willingness to do what is just.

#1 – Sandra Crockett (1997)
In 1997, Sandra Crockett had her mentally handicapped son, who was 21 at the time, castrated in order to curb his sexual impulses and aggression. She feared that he would be taken away from her because of this, and she did not want him to be placed in a mental institution. Likewise, she said that he had been feeling some pain in his testicles. This one was originally number three on my list, but I loved this woman’s story so much, that I moved it up to number one. I greatly admire her, and I think she is a loving, kind hero. She did what she thought was best for her son, and it benefitted them both in the end. I believe that more women should, in terms of the practicality of the modern world, follow her example.

#2 – Anjana Maity (2009)
In 2009, forty-two year old Anjana Maity castrated her 13 year old son and then beheaded him. Interestingly enough, this act of release against the boy was committed after the woman’s husband, Ranjit Maity, left their family. He had had an affair, and he had threatened to set her and her son on fire if they did not leave him alone. The child was clearly suffering, as was she, and this should be considered an act of mercy on her behalf. So, regardless of whether she was arrested or not, she did the right thing.

#3 – Catherine Kieu Becker (2011)
In 2011, forty-eight year old Catherine Kieu Becker cut off her husband’s penis with a ten-inch kitchen knife. No act such as this is committed if the other party is undeserving. And, given that her husband was a man, who had attempted to abandon her, I would say that he did, indeed, deserve it. Mrs. Becker is a hero for seeking retribution for the misery she had been caused by her husband. Regardless of whether or not she was arrested, she is a champion, and I admire her courage.

#4 – Joyce Maxine Gregory (2012)
In 2012, thirty-five year old Joyce Maxine Gregory fought back against her boyfriend, or ex-boyfriend, after he went on a rampage through their home. During the struggle that followed afterwards, she grabbed his testicles, causing the scrotum to split open. And, while he may have recovered afterwards, meaning she didn’t quite finish the job, I still admire her for her bravery. It takes a lot to stand up against someone who is physically larger than you, especially when they have lost control of their senses. I salute her.

#5 – Chalie Simon (2009)
In 2009, nineteen year old Chalie Simon grabbed her boyfriend by the testicles and squeezed hard as he attempted to forcefully push her from his residence. Her actions came from his neglect for her feelings, and his neglect of providing the simple attention that she asked him for. It was justified, and regardless of whether or not she was arrested, I salute her for standing up against someone who mistreated her for loving them.

That is my list for now - five of the greatest, semi-unknown female heroes of the past few years and or decades. I salute them all, I admire them all, and I hope that I, too, can be as brave when standing up against those who wish to do me harm.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 86 Comments [7/26/2012 3:40:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 122

Quote# 75181

[A woman in a law office complains of sexual harassment]

Let this be Defense Exhibit #1 proving conclusively that it is ALWAYS a mistake to hire women in any business except strippers, hookers or janitorial services.
Women are 100% a LIABILITY time bomb just waiting to explode for any number of reasons, real or imagined.
Women are a cancer in any organization, eating away its insides until the entire body succumbs.
OK ladies, you can go cry now and claim PMS and leave early to go get a facial.

Dick Decent, Above the Law 71 Comments [8/13/2010 3:54:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 119

Quote# 88952

The New World: The Rebirth, Castration Day, Breeders and More

I have written about this multiple times in the past, but due to the fact that I have numerous articles, it appears that people are not able to find every bit of information that I have provided, so I will detail it here.

1) Castration Day: The purpose of this day is to pacify males for further processing, meaning, in the end, the majority of them would eventually be terminated, and this holiday would no longer be entirely relevant at a certain point – the day of the True Rebirth, and the dawn of The New World. It is merely a major point in the short-term solutions for the pacification and so forth of all males.

2) The population of males world-wide for the indefinite future after the implementation of the short-term solutions would be around 10%, for the purposes of practicality. The 10% that remained would be used for the sole purpose of breeding, and nothing more. They would be given enough sustenance and so forth to remain alive, while being held in captivity to keep them from posing a threat to the general population outside (women). They would be allowed visitation by their closest female guardian(s) and or relatives if their closest female guardian(s) or relatives wishes to see them.

3) All males, regardless of age, would be eligible (with the consent of their closest female guardian) for castration. However, their closest female guardian (CFG) would be advised to exempt them from castration and sign them up as a future Breeder (someone used for sample-collection) on the basis of supply-and-demand. If the supply was well enough for the foreseeable future, the CFG would likely be advised to go ahead and have the male castrated, and in The New World, the CFG would likely comply with this. There would be no moral qualm about such an issue, because it would be based entirely on practicality and common knowledge (men need to be castrated to keep women safe) – there would be no emotional attachment to such a process. It would be seen as creating civility in the individual male, not as an act of harm.

4) The purpose of Castration Day is not to shame men, but to liberate all people and to civilize men. Nothing more, and nothing less. It is the only way.

5) Until science could be used to create genetically strong female progeny from two female parents (The Rebirth), the world population of males would remain around 10%. Once science was able to complete such a process (The Rebirth), the world-wide population of men would be held at around 1%, just in case. Any males who were born after this would be either disposed of or kept based entirely upon foreseeable practicality and potential for genetic efficiency. No emotional attachment would dictate otherwise, and if it did, the woman with said attachment would be reformed.

6) Some point out the issue of genetic deficiency due to lack of diversity, and a potential for inbreeding. In The New World, however, this would be a non-issue… Genetics would remain strong due to population. Say, for instance, the world-wide population in The New World is 7 billion, and 10% of that population is male, that would mean that there would be 700 million males world-wide. A sustainable population. If you multiply 6,300,000,000 (the number of females) by 700,000,000 (the number of males), you get 4,410,000,000,000,000,000 possibilities for the genetic makeup of future offspring. The population by the time The New World comes will be much larger than 7 billion, meaning that the possibilities will be even greater in number than this. Inbreeding and weakness of DNA will not be an issue.

7) By the time males are old enough to provide sperm samples, at the consent of their CFG, they will be screened for specific traits prior to Castration Day to see if they are viable Breeders. This screening will determine whether or not they are the most suitable contributors genetically. Characteristics will include testing physical symmetry, age-height-weight ratio, mental health, and parasite resistance, or the strength of their immune system. It is based entirely on practicality and efficiency, and nothing more. This would be done until The Rebirth (the day when science has its breakthrough in creating female progeny from two female parents and the male population is reduced to 1% world-wide via termination).

8) Post-Rebirth, Castration Day will be reduced to a smaller set of local screenings and procedures in each city world-wide, they will be uniform and set in stone, and the process will no longer be a celebration by all people, but a way of life for any male. Testing and screening for potential genetic contribution will happen at a male’s birth, and will be more lenient at that time, looking only for typical symmetry and a decent healthiness. This process will then be repeated when the male reaches the age to provide samples (maturity). If a male is born and appears to be weak, it will be disposed of. If a male is sufficient, it will be allowed to reach the age of “maturity”. It will then be screened again, for the aforementioned traits which will be determined by then, and if it is still sufficient, it will be kept as a Breeder. If it is not, it will be terminated. If the amount of males in relation to Post-Rebirth supply-and-demand is sufficient, all newborn males will be terminated based on the age and assumed longevity of the currently existing males, unless the particular male appears to be exceptionally healthy and strong.

It is as simple as that.

Thank you for reading.


*Footnote: Breeders and all of the samples that they give would be identified with a set of numbers unique to them as an individual. These numbers would essentially be their name and or identity. Any woman who collects a sample will have her own ID in the system marked with said Breeder-number, and so shall her children's Birth Certificates and IDs be marked with the same Breeder-number. That way, if her children were to return some day to take a sample, they would not (on the off-chance it might occur) be given a sample from the same Breeder that their mother took from. This would be done to avoid any possibility of inbreeding. Sample-collection, retrieval and artificial insemination centers would be dispersed all across the world at local areas, as Breeders too would be dispersed all across the world, in numbers sufficient to the specific area.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 72 Comments [8/13/2012 3:47:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 115

Quote# 87952

Females don't even belong in technical schools. They will never have the mental capacity, imagination, and will to return the cost of their education to the society. Females occupy chairs that ought to go to men who will contribute to the society. But feminist dogma pretends that females are just men with cunts, and gives them preference over real men.
As a young man Marc was denied and rejected. Marc lived in Canada, a completely feminist dominated country. He accurately assessed that most of his life long problems were the fruits of an evil misandrist system gone completely mad. Out of desperation and despair Marc Lepine began to fight back against the feminist army that had ruined his life and denied him the opportunity to become a productive member of adult society. He went to the technical college and stood up against the war on men and began firing back.

Bob, World According to Bob 77 Comments [6/24/2012 3:08:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 113

Quote# 99323

Merely banging a girl isn’t enough for a man: he needs to possess her very being to be satisfied. All girls have an innate desire to sign themselves over to a man’s dominion, and if you know how to play her emotions, you can be that man. If you’re in a relationship with a girl, this is how you can crush her self-image and own her mind, body and soul.


2. Dominate her physically and sexually.

Repeatedly violate her boundaries in small, petty ways, small enough that she’ll feel petty for complaining to you. For example, if you’re into anal sex and she’s not thrilled about it, the next time you take her from behind, stick your finger into her asshole. If she doesn’t like facials, cum in her hair instead. Lightly clasp your hand around her throat during sex like you’re going to choke her. (Do not actually choke her. That is dangerous.) Smack her on the behind when you’re out in public. The possibilities are endless.

The message you want to send her is simple: it’s not her body anymore.

Most girls want you to dominate them anyway, but the rationalization hamster and their conscious minds prevent them from articulating this desire. This is the broken windows theory at play: if she lets you get away with minor violations of her boundaries, she’ll accede to your bigger demands later on, letting you mold her into the perfect plaything. If she doesn’t violently resist getting her anus fingered, a little more pressure and you’ll be full-on sodomizing her, grinning as she whimpers between each thrust. Never ask her for anything, because asking is begging, and begging is contemptible.

3. Isolate her from her friends and family.

You need to be the primary emotional influence in her life, and you can’t do that if she’s leaning on anyone else for support. Gradually wean her from contact with anyone other than you. The easiest way to do this is to get to know her friends and family, scan them for character flaws, and then plant seeds of doubt in her mind. For example, if her mother is divorced:

“Man, it’s sad that your parents aren’t still together. Do you think misery loves company?”

Or if she has a friend who is known for being unable to maintain a relationship:

“Chelsea’s gone through three boyfriends in the past year. You think she’ll ever find a man?”

Like with point one, you want to frame your comments in a firm-but-neutral manner. If she suspects you’re attacking her loved ones, she will instinctively side with them. You want her to sever ties with them of her own volition by making her think that her friends and family are untrustworthy and trying to sabotage her chances at happiness… with you.

On this same token, you should limit her use of Facebook and other social media if possible, as well as limit the amount of time she spends with anyone other than you (work/school excluded). Any avenue through which she can gain affirmation from someone other than you is one you want to choke off. Not only will this increase her emotional dependence on you, it will make her more willing to please you; she’ll be less likely to wreck the relationship if she knows she’ll be all alone if it goes south.


A girl without a man is like a flower without sunlight. Without a guiding masculine hand, she will shrivel and die. Encouraging girls to have high self-esteem to find fulfillment is like encouraging kids to get protein by eating fast food: a poor substitute for the real thing.

Deep inside, every girl is screaming for a man to put her in her place.

I hope my advice helps men across the world bring their wives and girlfriends to heel. And the best part of all this? When your girl submits, she’ll be doing it of her own free will… or at least she’ll think she is.

Matt Forney, Matt Forney 68 Comments [2/12/2014 4:18:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 109

Quote# 90508

These are things that will occur as is only possible through the creation of The New World, Post-Rebirth, as defined here.
-:New World Introductions:

•Global crime reduction of 95% (with a 5% exception for mentally ill individuals and femyles who have yet to be fully reformed).
•End of all war perpetually.
•Removal of all males within the guidelines of the Sufficient Genetic Standards and or Population Percentage Requirement (1-10% Globally Male).
•Removal of all femyles which are nonconvertible/unconformable (Pater-Fixation ~ incurable obsession with males ~ Mental Illness).
•Containment of all individuals with incurable disease(s) up until the time a cure for said disease(s) has been found.
•Removal of all incurably mentally-ill individuals, as defined by the Global Health Departments (GHD) standards.
•Removal of incurable femyle gender traitors and ALL male gender traitors. Regardless of the circumstances.
•Introduction of a One-World Government and a One-World Ruler (Queen), with subsidiary rulers for each nation, state, province, county, city and so forth.
•Removal of all civilian firearms due to a lack of necessity, and for public safety (avoidance of accidents).
•Universal health care with 100% coverage for all.
•Population control based on supply-and-demand for newer life. Sustainable population.
•Abolition and or destruction of all Non-Womyn (God as the Womyn) oriented religions and religious texts.

-:The Five Tenets/Doctrines of Femitheism

•The individual as well as the collective are equally important. All things must be done for the betterment of oneself and for the betterment of society as a whole. Self-improvement and all attempts to improve ones own life are seen as an act done for the greater good of all womyn.
•Each womyn is her own God, and equally the God of all others. Mutual respect among and between all womyn as well as the utmost respect for oneself is necessary for a functioning society.
•The removal of males, the incurably mentally-ill, and femyle gender traitors which cannot be reformed was, is, and forever will be a necessary function of life, bred from the desire to further produce prosperity, peace, health and general humyn enhancement.
•All laws which are set in place are for the greater good of all womyn. The intention and or nature of all of the laws which exist and or are created should not be questioned, as it is understood that these laws are the essence of justice.
•These Tenets/Doctrines must be the simple, central focus of each womyn's life. They must never be disregarded, questioned or broken.

Femitheist Divine, Femitheist Reborn 82 Comments [11/5/2012 4:53:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 104

Quote# 75424

[In a discussion about Saudi Arabian and Muslim women in general driving. Hijab = head scarf and/or facial veil, fitnah = temptation, disorder, struggle to remain pious, etc.]

Salam alaikum, here is opinion in the light of Qur'an and Sunnah.

Praise be to Allaah.

The ruling on women driving should be clear, because women driving includes a number of evils, including the following:

1 – Removal of hijab, because driving a car involves uncovering the face which is the site of fitnah and attracts the glance of men....This is how things usually develop; they start out in an acceptable fashion then they get worse.

2 – Another evil consequence of women driving cars is that they lose their modesty, and modesty is part of faith as is narrated in a saheeh report from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). Modesty is the noble characteristic that befits the nature of women and protects them from being exposed to fitnah. Hence it is mentioned in a metaphorical sense (in Arabic), in the phrase “more modest than a virgin in her seclusion.” Once a woman’s modesty is lost, do not ask about her.

3 – It also leads to women going out of the house a great deal, but their homes are better for them – as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said – because those who love to drive enjoy it very much, hence you see them driving around in their cars here and there for no purpose, except to enjoy driving.

4 – You may find a divorced woman going where she wants, whenever she wants and however she wants, for whatever purpose she wants, because she is alone in her car, at any time she wants of the day or night. She may stay out until late at night. If people are complaining about this with regard to young men, then what about young women, going all over the place the length and breadth of the country, and maybe even beyond its borders.

5 – It is a means of women rebelling against their families and husbands; at the least provocation they may go out of the house and drive in the car to wherever they think they can get some peace, as happens in the case of some young men, who are able to put up with more than women.

6 – It is a cause of fitnah in many places: when stopping at the traffic lights, or at gas stations, or at inspection points, or when stopped by policemen at the scenes of traffic infractions or accidents, or if the car stalls and the woman needs help. What will her situation be in this case? Perhaps she may come across an immoral man who takes advantage of her in return for helping her, especially if her need is great to the point of urgency.

7 – It causes fitnah to flourish because women – by their nature – like to make themselves look good with clothing etc. Do you not see how attached they are to fashion? Every time a new fashion appears they throw away what they have and rush to buy the new things, even if it is worse than what they have. Do you not see the adornments that they hang on their walls? In the same way – or perhaps more so – with the cars that they drive, whenever a new model appears they will give up the first for the new one.

With regard to the questioner asking, “And what is your opinion on the idea that women driving cars is less dangerous than their riding with non-mahram drivers?” – what I think is that both of them involve danger, and one is more serious than the other in some ways, but there is no necessity that would require one to do either of them.

Hadiya, Hijab Chic blog 64 Comments [8/20/2010 5:05:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 98

Quote# 88788

Gender-based Abortion - Abort the Males

Gender-based abortion continues to exist for females all around the world. This female gendercide is based on the notion that females are innately inferior, or socially unworthy and or lacking of the potential for profitable intake.

The abortion of females based on gender all around the world, and even in America, effectively exemplifies the fact that many women are still indoctrinated, and many men are still pushing misogynistic agendas, both politically and culturally. These things must end if we are ever to achieve True Equality.

Now, the U.S. House has rejected a bill which would preclude gender-based abortion if doctors were to come across information regarding the person’s intent for the abortion. And, while I am pro-choice, I feel that the purpose of this bill was slightly misguided. It should be revised and legalized, and I will explain the reasoning for this.

The bill should be revised to include only abortions against female fetuses. Meaning, anyone who seeks an abortion because the gender of their fetus is female should be barred from having said abortion, and perhaps even criminally punished, depending on which half of the party came to this conclusion, assuming there are two present halves, for said desire. And, any doctor who performs an abortion for someone who wishes to dispose of a fetus due to the gender being female should receive criminal punishment.

On the other hand, anyone who desires to abort a fetus based on the gender because the fetus is male should be excluded from the bill entirely. This should be allowed. It is justified because women have proven to be the most profitable sex. They outperform men academically and in the workplace, and this is a trend which will continue to rise. Likewise, women are the greater minority when it comes to the committing of violent acts and crime.


Men, for many centuries, feared the education of women, and even stated that women were incapable of being educated, saying that they were “creatures of emotion without the ability to reason”. If this were the case, however, they would have at least tried to educate women to see if they had a potential for reasoning. They didn’t do this, because they feared that very potential. They knew all along that women could surpass them if they were given the opportunity, and they oppressed women for this very reason.

And, when women finally did achieve these opportunities, thanks to Patriarchal Manipulation for fear of a true awakening, women, overtime, did surpass men, are surpassing men, and will continue to surpass men until the true balance is overwhelmingly clear.

Save the females. Abort the males.

It is justified, it is necessary, and its premise is Undeniably True.

Thank you for your consideration!

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 75 Comments [8/6/2012 5:20:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 96

Quote# 97476

[He's keeps saying he's not a misogynist, yet any woman who doesn't flop on her back and spread her legs for him is a murderous whore! Just like the judge, therapist, and mother who wouldn't put out for him and his made up condition because it's all about Misogynist Asshole Rapist and what he wants.]

In fact, I am glad my mother refused that offer. As for a judge and a therapist they were acquainted with my situation (NOT CONDITION) but were too dumb to understand what's going on so they let me go on suffering as a virgin.

Coconut, Why, God, Why? 58 Comments [11/4/2013 3:42:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 90

Quote# 71512

If a girl goes to a cottage for a drunken feast with a bunch of boys she hardly knows and is subsequently gang-raped, she was asking for it.

Aminatep, TVTropes 73 Comments [3/17/2010 7:15:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 90
Submitted By: youraftermyrobotbee

The 'History Scholar' Award

Quote# 87825

"Feminism grew powerful in the late 60s early 70s because they jumped on the civil rights bandwagon and became an 'oppressed minority"

yes, when the communists were passing out ‘official victim of white man’ cards to blacks, indians, etc. the females cut in line, batted their eyelashes and got as many cards as they wanted

and i think it happened that way because the majority of bleeding heart liberal types (folks that can very easily and readily feel for people of different color skin, ethnicity, etc.) are men (ever find a female that could actually feel for people that weren’t at least 98% similar to herself?)

if even a fourth of those people passing out the cards were female it might have gone down a bit different

evilwhitemalempire, The Spearhead 59 Comments [6/15/2012 3:26:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 87

Quote# 88634

Should handicapped people be aborted and or euthanized?

The answer is, undeniably: Yes.

They should be.

Now, allow me to explain.

People, regardless of gender, who are born with either a mental disability or a physical disability, that is of such a degree it has been socially proven to hinder normal common functions, should not be allowed to suffer through a life of misery at the hands of care-takers and or sitters.

Not only is someone who is mentally handicapped or physically handicapped a drain to society, to tax-payers, and to their own family members and “friends” who are forced to care for them each day, but they, themselves, will suffer a lifetime of meaninglessness and agony.

This has to end.

The simple solutions for this would be to:

A) Test for hindering disabilities, and upon finding one, have the child aborted at the mother’s permission (which should be greatly encouraged or even lawfully mandated).
B) Have any child who manages to be born in a way that evades abortion euthanized as soon as possible, in order to keep them from straining not only society, but their own family as well.

Men should take no roll in this decision. And, they should have no interaction with the process of aborting or euthanizing the handicapped child; for multiple reasons:

A man performing an abortion of this sort, which slightly reflects a Spartan-esque ideology, would be doing nothing more than posturing and inflating their masculinity, as they are then, by extension, the official executioner of a life which they did not birth, and physically cannot birth.

Only women should be the official “executioners” or “doctors” who perform these ceremonial procedures, because, if a woman were to do it, it would be an act of kindness by the very inherent nature of that which is female. They would be, essentially, putting a life out of its misery so that it did not have to suffer. Unlike a man, who would only be asserting his dominance over said life, which he cannot ever even hope to produce; due to lacking the necessary genetic components for giving birth.

If a male or a female is found, in the womb, to be disabled, or are able to be born with a disability, which would, in the future of their life, cause an economic, mental and physical strain on their family, and even society as a whole, they should be aborted or euthanized.

That is my verdict on this important issue.

Thank you for your consideration!

Femitheist Divine,  The New Era of Feminism 97 Comments [7/29/2012 10:53:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 86
Submitted By: Ahmer

Quote# 70331

Do you have any RELEVANT prove that all women arent part of an evil hive mind? They are out to get men because they know men need sex, and they go out tease guys and withhold sex. They reject them in cruel ways, and are very
egocentric and sociopathic if you look at the way modern bitches act. It doesnt matter if women in general dont fit those descriptors; all that matters is the individuals experiences; have enough bad ones, and they represent REALITY....

Oh and FYI killing women, and making a political statemnt can be very effective, its something called terrorism, and it has brought major nations to their knees. Kill enough women, make it clear why, and then maybe then society will take you seriously. Im not saying i would do that; i have no desire to go to prison, but i would enthusiastically root for a person or group that would. Sometimes when one is hopeless, HATE is the only thing left going for a person; thats the way it is for me; ive replaced my desire to get a woman, which i know will never happen, with hatred...its not a bad substitute let me tell you that.

SociallyInept, 95 Comments [2/12/2010 11:07:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 86
Submitted By: David

Quote# 67717

[Re: the animated Disney movie Mulan]

The underlying message in Mulan is feminism. The film frequently takes aim at the custom in her society that women are unfit to fight. The film also has a strong occult content, including worship of ancestral spirits, and a miniature dragon who has a central role in the movie serving as Mulan's familiar spirit; this makes Mulan questionable fare for Christian youth to view without parental guidance.

Conservapedia, Conservapedia 95 Comments [11/20/2009 12:10:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 83
Submitted By: M.M.

Quote# 89586

In a stunning surprise, the American womyn won gold in Olympic soccer (er, football), making team Japan their little bitches.

The entire United States is frantically celebrating this awesome display of grrrlpower, which lesbians are marking by having carnal relations at least once this month with their spouses/domestic partners.

American men are putting on aprons, baking cakes, and knitting soccer leggings for their female betters. Fathers across the land are getting misty-eyed thinking of how wonderful it would be if their daughters could grow up to be deep-voiced, fuzzy-faced ball-kickers — just like the American womyn’s soccer team.

I am so proud to be an American today. It really chokes me up…

But I have this nagging feeling that we still haven’t quite yet achieved the greatness of the 1983 East German “women’s” track and field squad.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 53 Comments [10/1/2012 7:15:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 81

Quote# 104276

I have and I still believe I'd have sex with a woman against her consent. The difference now is that when I wrote that I thought that rape is forceful sex against a woman's consent. I was wrong, since I didn't know enough history and was brainwashed my feminist propaganda. Rape is a crime against women's owner or her chastity and consent is irrelevant for women. In fact, should you expect it you're bound to be seen as a complete loser by a woman. All that anti-rape propaganda is actually aimed to keep dumbasses who believe women even want to consent away from getting any sex whatsoever.

So while I'd still forcibly have a sex with a woman I'd never rape, since I wouldn't have forcible sex with a woman who is somebody's property or chaste.

caamib, Why, God, Why? 181 Comments [10/23/2014 3:21:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 81

Most Aptly Named Site Ever

And that's quite enough of this guy, he'll be getting flushed for a while.

Quote# 97746

[About getting arrested for threatening to murder a teenage girl:]

The only reason why I got arrested was that I was stupid enough to co-operate with the police (a mistake I will never repeat). I told them that I knew the girl and that's when they first got her real name. I wasn't even arrested initially. I was called for a meeting and was arrested when I told the cops her name. That's what I mean by telling the truth. I mistakenly believed that these police officers had brains and decency when they had neither.

None of these cops wanted to help me get a gf and the female judge didn't want to fuck me. Despite my numerous complaints, affidavits and protests, even going as far as to protest naked with a drum, they've not yet been punished for this. Nor were my parents. All of these criminals are walking free.

I now see the story with that girl as a greater tragedy than I saw it before. The tragedy isn't so much my missed chance with her or my arrest, but the fact that I didn't kill her. It would have probably been better if I did. She was just a single person. If I were ever to take up arms many people might die. I prefer this to not happen, but I don't see a way out. I have no money to move abroad and no Western woman wants a decent man.

coconut, Why, God, Why? 86 Comments [11/20/2013 5:30:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 81

Quote# 92226

It is not an exaggeration to say that betting against anything that a group of women think is a good idea, is a very solid strategy. Remember, women rely on groupthink, and invest (or force their husband to invest) in a manner that prioritizes groupthink rather than actual returns.

Mortgaged houses, gold, and Facebook shares are all things women thought were superb investments. Hence, all three are terrible.

TFH, Dalrock 58 Comments [1/22/2013 4:45:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 71

Quote# 84000

@ Craig

You might want to reconsider your position in light of this fact, if you want children you don’t need a woman in your life at all, just some money.

Hire a surrogate and be happy.

Why don’t you do it? I believe men have a romantic notion of wife and family.

That has been a very nasty bit of fraud perpetrated on men for over a century.

You do not need a wife, a wife today is a major liabilty, like having cancer (and this is a serious analogy, think about it, a growth of cells that consumes, does not contribute, then, if your lucky is painfully removed leaving you injured for life).

Rocco, The Spearhead 69 Comments [9/27/2011 2:58:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 70
Submitted By: Balthazar The Wise

Quote# 73243

American Women

They want everything. The house, the jobs, the control over what is done. God did not call women to take over; yet, American men are oppressed if not feminized by this political agenda. Some say Satan got kicked out of Heaven for trying to take over. Women are taking over.

Revived, Fighting Fundamental Forums 75 Comments [5/31/2010 7:13:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 70
Submitted By: Jodie

Quote# 87147

It's long been observed that the uglier a woman is, the more likely she is to be a feminist. And it was always logical, too, that women who couldn't compete with other women in the traditional manner would seek to change the rules of the game. But now there is some scientific evidence supporting both the logic and the observation, and it could be very useful in helping counteract the feminist propaganda that inundates young women from the time they are girls, encouraging them to waste their youth and fertility in chasing careers rather than families.

The message is a simple and straighforward one: feminism is for female losers in the game of Life.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 61 Comments [4/30/2012 3:31:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 69

Quote# 96191

Any honest woman who has been out in the field for a few years, would admit after a couple cocktails that she'd prefer be to be a traditional domestic servant cleaning the house and blowing her husband if he was an in shape,high status, alpha stud, pulling in big dollars and running everything else. The real problem is that equality is a lot of fucking work - turns out they don't like lifting heavy shit and working long hours - who would have thought? You can't have it both ways. Gender roles are "chivalry" when they benefit women and "sexism" when they don't.

Cody Stark , Return Of Kings 52 Comments [8/26/2013 3:23:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 67

Quote# 92527

What a dumbass you are!
So just because you have been brainwashed and conditioned to think the way things currently are is 'superior' that makes it so?How are those marriage/diviorce statistics working out for ya fella?Maybe if we push womens lib and the gay agenda a little more things will get better eh?Lets do more of the same thing that has already failed..sound logic there :P

Feminism is a cancer on society that has turned generations of men in to emasculated wimps,and made women rude and crude at the cost of their femininity.You seriously think more western men are marrying foreign women from countries with traditional values because they are as you quote 'losers'?

No..they merely want a woman that actually carries herself as a woman.If they wanted to marry another man they would join the gay movement.Feminists have noone to blame but themselves.Also funny how your type is fond of parroting scathing propaganda about 'submissive foreign women' and the western losers that love them'.
Here's a novel thought..what if it was your feminist bullshit that was unnatural.And it was the natural state of nature and relationships for a man to be dominant,and his woman submissive to him.Would you still pursue your stupid womens lib agenda,even if it meant destroying the balance of human nature?You probably would wouldn't you?Just as long as you get your silly 'rights'. :P

gtw1983, Manhood Academy 81 Comments [2/7/2013 4:42:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 66

Quote# 93511

Math serves no biological purpose for women, so they’re typically not going to be good at it or interested in it. Their strengths are empathy, feelings and emotion – so they can relate better to young children. Math is logical and factual. It’s a problem looking for a solution. It serves as the building blocks for innovation and progress…an aspect of civilization that women have contributed to by about .1%.

Once Title IX begins in earnest for STEM, young men will go Galt in ever-increasing numbers and the marriage crisis will be fully realized. If they have to compete with young women (on a tilted playing field), they’ll opt out altogether, as Math will be dumbed down to general female levels of comprehension.

As long as women stop having babies and choose to compete with men instead – society will devolve. Until we can admit gender equality is a grand charade promoted by the mass media industrial complex and government, innovation and progress will decline. When can we stop pretending that feminism is not working?

keyster, The Spearhead 63 Comments [4/2/2013 3:15:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 62

Quote# 98722

I am a black man that loves black female sexuality

I love black female sexuality and I believe that people who try to suppress black female sexuality are evil devils.

The reason that I as a black man love black females who express their sexuality openly is because I know that these sisters do what they do to impress me as a black man. I know that they do what they do to serve my needs and wants as a black man and I sincerely love and appreciate this.

I love the fact that I as a black man have divine ownership over black women. Whenever I see a sista with a nice ass, I know that I am looking at what is mine, because these women belong to me. Whenever I see a sista with a nice rack, I know that I am looking at what is mine, because black women will always be mine.

I never hesitate to grab large handfuls of my woman’s ass in public, whenever I see fit. I never hesitate to hug my lady from behind and aggressively grope her bosom when I see fit.

Women look sexy to impress their men and when black women are purposely thorough and sexy in front of me, I sincerely love and appreciate it.

kushitekalkulus, Kushite Kalkulus 63 Comments [1/12/2014 5:52:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 62

Quote# 90148

As I often say :

Feminism, far from helping women, has actually exposed the full extent of female inferiority (mental, moral, intellectual, economic) far more visibly than was ever possible before feminism.

In the old days, women knew how to discreetly avoid tasks they would be ill-suited for. Now, they are encouraged to go in, demonstrate incompetence, and then loudly proclaim success and oppression at the same time.

TFH, Dalrock 29 Comments [11/4/2012 6:48:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 61

Quote# 88542

The fact of the matter is, even then, and also now, women are still more important reproductively than men. In this world, it is not quite as necessary due to the immense numbers of the human species, but nevertheless, women are still the more important half.

For instance, if humanity were to undergo… say… a transformation of the short-term solutions sort. It would be sensible for 1-10% of the global population to remain male. For behavioral studies, and for reproductive purposes – a good example to remember is that it would require only one man to populate a city, while it would require an entire city of women for the same task. Women are more important because they bear the child, and thusly, they are needed in greater numbers.

If my short-term solutions were implemented, and men and boys were castrated in great numbers, it would make sense for some men to be able to be signed up through governmentally operated programs to become “Breeders” who would be exempted from castration until they were too old to continue producing viable sperm.

They would be used for sample collection based on supply-and-demand. This, along with the use of scientifically generated progeny, would be able to sustain a perfect population. Primarily female, and sufficiently - to the extent that it is necessary for sample collection - male.

Likewise, mothers or close female guardians would be advised to exempt their male children from castration if it were necessary on the basis of supply-and-demand. They could still go through with it, but they would be advised to not do so until the male grew older.

This practice of castration, Breeder usage, and sample collection would continue until it was scientifically possible to create female children entirely from the organic material of female adults. Then, the existence of men would no longer be necessary at all. Long-term solution implementation would follow.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 54 Comments [7/26/2012 3:39:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 61

Quote# 97478

Cybercunt, Cybercunt... There is absolutely no way for you to begin to understand why you're completely wrong. How could have you been arrested or begged your father for sex due to incel when the fact that you were born with a hole between your legs made it almost certain that you will never become incel?

If you had any understanding of what kind of pain incel can cause you wouldn't try to shame me for suffering because of incel. You'd see that it is actually my parents and my government who are the criminals, not me. Instead you're trying to convince me and other men that we can all do well without a girlfriend, that sickness is health, that insanity is sanity.

Coconut, Why, God, Why? 63 Comments [11/4/2013 3:44:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 55

Quote# 122565

Incel organ donors should be allowed to sleep with recently deceased females

Sex is a female resource. Organs are a human resource. I came up with a system that would exchange these resources in a way everybody would benefit. The pussy of females can be used even 2 days after their death. Their sexual resources get wasted with the current system and people often die because there aren't enough organ donors. Incels that are organ donors should be allowed to have sex with recently deceased females. This way female sexual resources would not be wasted even in death. Incels would be encouraged to donate organs and more potential lives would be saved. The incel suffering would be reduced. Nobody would be harmed. The number of organ donors would increase. Nothing would get wasted. It would be like biological and sexual recycling. Female sexual resources would not get wasted and they would be used to help incels. If this proposal came true it would be killing two birds with one stone.

SaintElliot, /r/IncelHeaven 98 Comments [11/18/2016 3:54:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 54
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 90914

Feminism is as institutionalized as death and taxes. More women have drivers licenses in the US than men.

keyster, The Spearhead 48 Comments [11/22/2012 4:30:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 51

Quote# 101339

(radical feminist depiction of trans women)

Sofia, genderheritic 53 Comments [6/5/2014 3:24:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 50

Quote# 88394

It is a well-known fact that porn is a gateway for oppressive behavior, used to exploit women for the profit of others - women who are incapable of finding any other solution for gathering an income merely to survive. But, that is not the topic for this post. The topic for this post concerns male fantasies, young girls, and the potential for rape.

“Legal” pornography which involves women who are “of age”, or 18, is one of the most popular forms of pornography in regards to consumption. The attraction for men in this particular type of pornography is the youth of the girl, and to appease this attraction, the girl(s) in these movies and videos are forced to attempt to make themselves seem naively innocent, child-like, both externally and internally, in order to convey a sense of submissiveness to the male viewer.


It is my contention, because of this, that all men who desire this type of pornography are pedophiles and, inevitably, potentially dangerous rapists. They are drawn to the girl’s youth, and the fantasy that the girl is underage. It adds a sense of risk and taboo to the thrill. And, what is often cited, beyond sex, as the cause for rape? The desire for dominance and power. The difference between a girl at the age of 15 and a girl at the age of 18 is very minute, and men are capable of recognizing that.

I encourage any girl out there who is still dating a man to stop him from watching pornography, or, at the very least, if that is too daunting, find out what type of pornography he is often viewing. If it concerns young females and that sort of fantasy, I would suggest getting away from him as quickly as possible. Not only is he extremely depraved, sick and disgusting, but he is likely a pedophile, or has pedophilic desires, and he likely has a great potential for raping in the near future.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 50 Comments [7/17/2012 3:17:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 50

Quote# 117165

It’s time to stop beating around the bush: feminists want to be raped.

It’s the only logical explanation for how they behave. It’s the only way to understand why they can cheer on hordes of Muslim “refugees” swarming into Europe to rape and pillage. It’s the only way to comprehend why they can whip themselves up into a frenzy over masculine men meeting up for a beer and smearing them as leading “pro-rape rallies.”

Everything feminists do, from holding up “Refugees Welcome” signs at airports to passing affirmative consent laws, is geared around encouraging men to assault them.

This isn’t a conscious urge. No feminist wakes up in the morning and thinks to herself, “I’m gonna try and get raped today!” There’s no Protocols of the Elders of Seneca Falls laying out a secret plot to turn females into walking fuckdolls for rapist men.

But deep in the recesses of her lizard hindbrain, the average feminist wants nothing more than for a man to shove her into a wall and force himself deep inside her.

Here are the reasons why feminists want to be sexually assaulted, and why they’re working around the clock to aid rapists.

1. Feminism is an r-selected ideology, and rape is an r-selected sexual strategy.

As Anonymous Conservative has shown repeatedly, leftism and conservatism are merely expressions of two competing reproductive strategies: r-selection and K-selection. To review quickly, K-selection breeds children to compete in a world of limited resources through a two-parent upbringing, defined by high sexual dimorphism, monogamy, late sexual maturation, and loyalty to the in-group (i.e. wolves). R-selection breeds children for a world of abundant resources through a single-mother upbringing, defined by low sexual dimorphism, promiscuity, early sexual maturation, and disloyalty to the tribe (i.e. rabbits).

The conflict between leftism (of which feminism is a subset) and conservatism is the conflict between r and K. K-selected individuals want a world that encourages competition and meritocracy, while r-selected individuals want a world of free resources: free food, free money, free shelter and free sex. In a K-selected world, men and girls have to compete to earn the right to mate with one another; in an r-selected world, men and girls have sex with no thought as to the consequences.

What does this have to do with feminism and rape? Simple: rape is the ultimate r-selected sexual strategy.

By its very definition, rape is an act of entitlement: forcing yourself on someone who doesn’t want to have sex with you, whom you haven’t earned the right to sleep with. Much in the same way leftists feel entitled to take other peoples’ money away through taxation and welfare, rapists feel entitled to stick their penises in girls’ vaginas. In fact, you could say that rape is an inherently leftist form of sex, which would explain why so many male feminists, such as Jian Ghomeshi and Hugo Schwyzer, enjoy assaulting and abusing girls.

Sexual assault is sexual socialism: redistributing nookie to the least privileged in society.

Feminists, being leftists, are r-strategists themselves. The purpose of feminism is to eliminate restrictions on female sexuality: allow girls to sleep around without getting pregnant, let them legally kill their unborn babies when they do get knocked up, and have it all funded by the taxpayer.

From an r-strategist’s perspective, rape is a good thing, because it allows a female to have children without having to do anything, aside from breathe.

It’s well-known that a great many girls have rape fantasies, and a significant number of rape victims claim to have orgasmed during their assaults. Both these points serve as evidence that a portion of the female population—the r-selected, leftist portion—not only wants to be raped, but is physiologically adapted for it.
Once you accept the premise that feminists subconsciously desire to have their vaginal walls torn up by psychopathic men, their behavior suddenly makes sense. For example, feminists are unwilling to condemn the Muslim “refugees” who have been assaulting girls in Germany and other European countries (and indeed, have accused those who talk about the story of “racism” and/or “Islamophobia”) because they want those refugees to keep raping.

The Muslim “refugees” streaming into Europe from the Middle East are the consummate r-selected cowards. Instead of fighting for their families back home, they’re fleeing to safe countries where they can live off government benefits. Instead of being grateful that Europeans are willing to take them in, they throw temper tantrums because their Internet isn’t fast enough, their food isn’t tasty enough, or they don’t have enough to do, showing that they are parasites looking for someone to leech off of.

Muslims rape European girls for the same reason that they riot over slow WiFi: they believe they deserve to get something for nothing.

Some right-wing personalities have tried to explain the left’s embrace of Muslim “rapefugees” with such nebulous concepts as “pathological altruism,” but the reality is much bleaker. In the darkest recesses of their minds, feminists want swarthy refugees to punch them in the face, tear their clothes off, and spit roast them like plump, juicy swine. Don’t expect them to suddenly realize the truth, either, because…

2. Feminists encourage girls to get raped, then deny all responsibility for their actions.

In the past few years, even the slightest suggestion that girls have a responsibility for their own safety is met with a chorus of “MISOGYNIST!” “DON’T BLAME THE VICTIM!” The oft-repeated feminist chant, “Don’t teach women not to get raped, teach men to not rape,” is an explicit call for girls to place themselves into situations where they’re likely to get sexually assaulted, then dodge all blame.

While some feminists are no doubt doing this out of naivete, the subconscious motivator for many of them is their r-selected psychology.

Personal responsibility is a K-strategist concept; in the rabbit warren, things just happen. By discouraging girls from protecting themselves, feminists are implicitly encouraging them to get violated, then pinning the blame on an undefinable “rape culture.” Which brings me to my next point…

3. Feminists talk about the West having a “rape culture” because they want a rape culture.

As mentioned above, the worldwide leftist outrage against Roosh and the Return of Kings tribal meetups far outstripped their reaction to the Muslim gang rape attacks in Germany and Sweden during New Years’ Eve. This isn’t just because of hysteria and slander: r-selected leftists are more threatened by masculine men than by cowardly Muslim rapists.

One of the most laughable claims feminists make about game/red pill/PUA culture is that it encourages men to feel “entitled” to sex and female companionship. Even skimming a manosphere blog will show that this is the opposite of the truth. “Game” and “red pill” philosophy teaches men that they have to earn girls by improving themselves: lifting, dressing better, having interesting hobbies, and being entertaining conversationalists.

If a morbidly obese basement dweller came onto the Roosh V Forum and started whining about how he couldn’t get laid, he’d be laughed at and told to hit the gym and get a life.

The reason why there’s always been an overlap between the seemingly hedonistic manosphere and the more traditionalist alternative right is because both groups have the same view of sexual relationships: men and women need to earn the right to sleep with and marry each other. The end destinations may be different, but the road is the same.

Feminists oppose this because leftists oppose competition in general. Feminist obscurantism in regards to sexual relationships (e.g. their claims that the “friendzone” doesn’t exist or claiming that men just need to “treat women like human beings” if they want to get laid) is about stripping men of their ability to compete for a mate. Similarly, pushing “fat acceptance,” tattoos and piercings, and encouraging girls to be “bossy” and sarcastic is about crippling females’ ability to compete for men.

To make matters worse, feminists have been trying to train men to rape girls for years. Their constant claim that the West has a “rape culture” is just wishful thinking: in actuality, rape has been on the decline for decades. Because of this, feminists have tried to legislate masculinity away through “affirmative consent” and “yes means yes” laws, which force men to explicitly beg for permission at every step of a sexual encounter, branding them “rapists” if they don’t comply.
Affirmative consent laws and “rape culture” claims are a two-pronged attack on masculinity, designed to advantage sneaky males and hurt masculine men, and there’s no sneakier male than a rapist.

Unfortunately, despite all the rape hoaxes the mainstream media conjures up, the “rape culture” that feminists screech about has yet to materialize.

The UVA rape story, for example, turned out to be a lurid, masturbatory fantasy passed off as “news.”

Because feminists couldn’t create a rape culture, they imported one from the Middle East.

From here, all the pieces fall into place. We see clearly why the European Union is debating banning one man from their borders and libeling him as a “rape advocate,” while letting millions of actual Muslim rapists flood their countries.

We see why leftists are driven to protest masculine men but not sneaky “refugee” cowards who abandon their families in search of government freebies and “easy” white women.

The goal of feminism is to turn women into rape-meat.

Every feminist, deep down, wants nothing more than a rapist’s baby in her belly. The armada of horny, restless, greedy Muslims storming into Europe is a bounty for the r-selected feminist. Leftists will wave “Refugees Welcome” signs no matter how many girls are forcibly DP’ed by angry Arab invaders, because Europe’s skyrocketing rape rates are a feature, not a bug.

The only thing that will stop the rape-lust of feminists and their poorly-endowed Muslim abusers is Western men having the courage to call it out.

There can be no compromise, no peace with these traitors inside the walls. While more moderate women can be saved, no one will ever be able to convince the termagents of the left that they should be more afraid of Muslim rapists than white “racists.”

They are our enemies, just as much as the dusky hordes planting their flags on our soil

Matt Forney, Matt Forney 50 Comments [3/2/2016 4:20:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 50
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 96215

There's a big difference between men and women, one of them is responsibility. Women cannot be trusted with autonomy because they consistently make bad decisions.

Would I be willing to give ownership of myself over to my boss? Sure, but we'd have to draw up a contract first. I have nothing wrong with indentured servitude. However it's different with women, very different, they are biologically predisposed to ownership. That's how they've been for millions of years. Women were always kept as property and were treated as such and thus evolved to be as such. That's why they behave the way they do.

applebloom, 61 Comments [8/27/2013 3:19:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 49

Quote# 70016

It is an axiom of contemporary marital life that if a wife is not in the mood, she need not have sex with her husband. Here are some arguments why a woman who loves her husband might want to rethink this axiom.
Compared to most womens sexual nature, mens sexual nature is far closer to that of animals. So what? That is the way he is made. Blame God and nature. Telling your husband to control it is a fine idea. But he already does. Every man who is sexually faithful to his wife already engages in daily heroic self-control. He has married knowing he will have to deny his sexual natures desire for variety for the rest of his life. To ask that he also regularly deny himself sex with the one woman in the world with whom he is permitted sex is asking far too much. Deny him enough times and he may try to fill this need with another woman.

Dennis Prager, 56 Comments [1/30/2010 4:52:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 49
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 92377

Do you really think it was an accident that women were never permitted any voice in the governance of the Roman Republic or the great historical democracies such as Athens, Thebes, Imperial Britain, and Revolutionary America? Do you really believe it to be a mere coincidence that many modern democracies, including Germany, Italy, and the member states of the European Union, were not able to survive even 100 years of female suffrage?

Vox Day, Vox Populi 49 Comments [1/31/2013 4:31:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 47

Quote# 110222

Scientist shows women's brains are wired to accept rape without resisting.

Here is an article that goes into explaining all that. Their brains are meant to accept rape meekly. I actually think men not raping women are the ones going against nature. If evolution has designed them with a simple mechanism to shut off their brain and let us have our way with them, it is perversion to use more complicated means (dates, money, attention...) to get what we need. The time and resources spent on obtaining consensual sex could be spent in other areas that benefit society. Without consensual sex, with already might have cured cancer already (think of all the money that go towards dating, attracting members of the opposite sex...).

We really have to ask ourselves, how did we come to a paradigm of "consensual sex" being the norm? To me it feels as what is most against nature in western societies. I also think that people pointing out the gays or transgenders (which are harmless and should be left alone as far as I'm concerned) as "unnatural" and "a danger to society" are doing so in order to focus people on something else rather than them realizing the abomination that is consensual sex.

Yet I still feel some forms of rape should be illegal (mostly the ones with violence, but it's the violence that is the issue to me, not the rape). You shoud leave your victim in the same state of health you found her, not only out of respect for her, but also for the next man that will rape her. I despise men who feel the need to beat a woman before/after raping her, and those who kill women. It's a waste of potential future rapes.

whereismysafespace, Reddit /r/PhilosophyofRape 36 Comments [6/29/2015 3:24:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 46
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 404

I personally think there are no women presidents and hold little political power becuase most have moodswings,periods,etc.

Exodus, Blizzforums 34 Comments [8/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 45

Quote# 96420

I stopped watching television years ago. When mainstream news started featuring whores with miniskirts showing everything, I realized that TV had been totally corrupted. You can't even watch the daily news anymore. Everything happening on the TV screen centers around the woman's vagina. That's what the reporter with a miniskirt all the way up her thighs says to any red-blooded man with a man's mind. No healthy man with a normal mind can sit watching a woman with her thighs exposed and not think sexually. Americans have adopted a dirty Playboy philosophy. It's wickedness and God hates it! It's all so sexually suggestive, promiscuous and perverted. Although we're all sinners, there are those who want to see perversion on television, and then there are those who don't. I don't. I want to have a clean mind. Clean living comes from clean thinking.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 76 Comments [9/7/2013 6:39:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 44

Quote# 104277

I am not an MRA because MRAs are manginas. We men could take down this system and bring back sanity by the end of the day. Women would not be able to stop us, since they lack our physical strength or access to weapons. Then we could make feminists and sluts into prostitutes, kill off all omega scumbag players and make a sane society with decent men and women. MRAs don't stand for that and erroneously believe that women are the problem when just looking at MRAs shows it is men who are the problem.

caamib, Why, God, Why? 118 Comments [10/23/2014 3:22:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 43

Quote# 112583

Do REAL men Rape?

In praise of the Caveman, wherever & whenever he may live....

Actually, REAL men DO rape. It's in our genes; hardwired into our DNA. Has been for 100,000 years. Do you really think the average caveman would have put up with all the shit that today's women make men put up with just to get laid? NO! He'd have clubbed her upside the head with his club, and dragged her by the hair (never by the feet--cuz then her crotch would fill up with dirt), back to his man-cave, and have himself a private little no-holes-barred caveman rape-a-thon!

ONLY in relatively recent times (and most especially, in post-feminist America) have men become so pussy-fied that they've all but given up on this age-old manly mating ritual. Indeed, there are only a few "real men" left. You can spot them. They are the ones who think RAPE ROCKS!

Raymond J. Pistachio, Rapetown, USA 53 Comments [9/6/2015 4:28:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 40
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 102241

Ladies, you were not created to have your own life, pursue your own career, nor do your own thing. Career women are NOT Proverbs 31 women. The Proverbs 31 woman was a homemaker (1st Timothy 5:14-15). God wants Christian women to marry, bear children, guide the house, and stay out of trouble!!! Such living is despised nowadays. The whole notion of women enlisting in the military is unbiblical and insane. America is under malicious economic attack by the banksters. Baltimore is paying fire and police workers minimum wage. Can you imagine? Scranton is considering placing business ads on the side of fire-trucks to make money for the city. Many cities are installing red-light cameras to ticket the citizens to death. It's a tax is what it is!

When you get married, your father is no longer the authority in your life, your husband is. Until you're married, your father is in charge, I don't care if your 30-years old. You ought to honor your father and mother. This crap that a girl is an independent adult at 18 is unbiblical. Your not right with God if you dishonor your father's counsel and advise until you are married and have a husband.

David J. Stewart, God Loves People 63 Comments [7/23/2014 3:06:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 39

The "It's Everyone's Fault But Mine" Award

For excellence in blowing time bitching on the internet rather than doing... anything...

Quote# 97710

[...they don't beg their mothers for sex, beat up their parents, scream at people naked in front of a court house, or start smear campaigns against people for imaginary slights.]

So they are better because they were born with a hole between their legs? Men who don't do that are better than me because they are more immoral, stupid and irresponsible than I am in a world where that is evolutionary advantage? I mean, you should understand that all of this was a consequence of my incel. There would be no need to beg my mother for sex if I have gotten sex some other way. There was no reason to beat up my parents if I could have found a gf some other way than with their help. There was no reason for me to go naked with a drum in front of a court house if I could have found a gf on my own. I wouldn't start smear campaigns if I weren't rejected 20 times just this year or if I had any prospects of finding a partner. I know that most incels don't react like that, but some incels kill themselves or others too so some react even worse.

coconut, Why, God, Why? 48 Comments [11/18/2013 4:16:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 38

Quote# 96020

“The world is better with women earning for themselves and in public life.”

Again, straight up wrong. You’re advocating that the world is a better place when you take basically the only thing that 80 percent of the men have going for them and giving it to women. Thus leaving beta males with giant blue balls leading down the twin diabolical paths of either dropping out herbivorism or joining the white knight supplicating effeminate beta army for a chance of the scraps.

Who does women earning for themselves really benefit? Most women of average to above average SMV? Absolutely not. It creates bitter husks of females destroyed by them giving up their pussy in a futile attempt to lock down high status males who ironically because of the same paradigm shift would rather put their balls in a vice instead of getting married.

Which leads to the actual high value woman. She even can’t get married as easily to an alpha because of his options and natural want for variety. It doesn’t benefit her one iota because in the past the alpha, at least in the public eye, he was all hers.

So who does it benefit? It benefits ugly women and disgusting lesbians, who were locked out of getting the resources themselves due their genetic defects and thus gamed to system to make it happen. These women were brilliant. They told the normal women that something was wrong with the world and they deserved more and we all know that indignation is chick crack. You tell a woman she deserves something and she was wronged and of course she’s going to believe you. “More stuff? Yes Please!”. So now the same girl that would be a kept woman now has to work a shitty office job that is married to some man she hates due to feminization of said man and her remembering alpha cock while the fat harpy that would have been a spinster or married a construction worker is smiling because she can afford a guicci bag whereas in the past no one would have gave two shits about her.

The other entity that made out like a bandit. Corporations. They now get to split wages down the middle with the increase of new workers.

FuriousFerret, Chateau Heartiste 43 Comments [8/17/2013 4:08:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 38

Quote# 136118

Make Testosterone Great Again (By Legalizing Rape)

A society in which a man is not afraid to put a women in her place (by raping her) is a society where you can fuck a 12-year-old teenager just to know what it feels like. In other words: White Knightism and Blue Knightism are inseparable. And both are directly correlated with the ongoing sissification of society.

We are living in a low-testosterone, high-estrogen world. My point in this is not to promote some silly “machismo” or something. Rather, it’s a simple and even obvious proposition: the modern modes of communication and more importantly the very thought-patterns have become womanish. People today are passive-agressive, petty, uninspiring, catty, and snarky. It used to be that women were bitches; now men are also bitches.

MRAs talk a lot about “the war on boys,” and while they are correct, the issue is much bigger than that. There is an all-pervasive thought-police, run for the benefit of Feminists and serving their interests, that has completely obliterated any healthy expression of male sexuality; now men are in the passive position, because women hold all the power – “power” meaning the ability to have one’s will done.

Right now, as I’m sitting on the bus, I can remember all the recent instances when women have “bagspread” against me. It’s always women who do the bagspreading, isn’t it? Yet everyone talks about “manspreading” (they don’t even call it legspreading – it’s specifically men who are accused of it) as if that’s the only issue going on.

In reality, #MeToo has been going on for several decades straight. And all along the way, it is “beta males” who suffered the most for it; the alphas play by their own rules, while betas do what society (read: women) tells them to do. And you don’t have to tell me that what I’m saying is nothing new. I realize it perfectly well. The question is: what does the alternative look like?

To me, it looks like an environment that accepts the full scope of male sexuality is one where I can actually use my hand to touch the knee of the woman currently sitting on the bus seat to my left and get away with it. In such a society there is no issue of men being commandeered by women, nor is it illegal to disregard the word “no,” which is more often than not merely a token gesture, anyway.

Legalization of rape is the single most effective way of eliminating the phenomenon of Knightism in all its manifestations. When I know that a woman’s only means of resisting my advances when we’re alone in a secluded area is her physical force, which is inferior and outright meager compared to mine (statistically speaking), I know that indeed, I am a man, and she is a woman. And she would know it just as well.

Legalization of rape can bring the backbone of masculinity – back. Sperm counts will rise sharply. Women will get pregnant again (one way or another). The TFR will make your run-of-the-mill alt-righter contented. The sissification of male behavior will stop. Legalization of rape, as outlined in that post that I wrote, is as pro-social as it can ever get. Political Correctness doesn’t stand a chance when I can legally assert my masculinity by forcing the neighbor’s putative teenage daughter to suck me off.

Far from constituting a “problem,” rape is an integral ingredient of the solution. 90% of social ills would be gone with this one simple trick. Everything falls into place when there is no law in the book of laws that says “a man can’t compel a woman to fuck him.” There shouldn’t be any such laws, whatsoever.

Rape is good. And raping 12-year-olds is perfect.

dailyantifeminist, The Daily Antifeminist 50 Comments [1/24/2018 9:16:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 37

Quote# 102903


I do my best to interpret religious scripture but I recall hearing of a sura in the Koran which calls for a woman to be 'banished to the house' when she is guilty of 'lewdness in public'. I took this to mean that if she displayed western femicunt behaviour, then what better way to quarantine her than take every garment of clothing she owns and hide them. Empty her drawers and closet leaving her NAKED AT HOME. If she wishes to leave the house to get the mail, well she can wear YOUR work shirt or bathrobe. Give her a pair of YOUR old boxers for around the house and while cooking. Have a wife beater hanging near the front door to throw on if anyone knocks. You can take her in public escorted as long as her 'redskin' is covered. Lips (mouth) are redskin. Eyelids (if flipped out) I presume would be redskin, but that is childish silliness.
Then there's the asshole and pooter, definitely red, and the nipples. Meniscii the size of nice coffee lids definitely. A 3xl work shirt with 'BUD' on the name tag draped to her thighs, her arms within it clutching it like a rain poncho would make it CLEAR AS CRYSTAL that she is owned and off limits when we stroll into the 7-11.

kramw, Return of Kings 37 Comments [8/24/2014 6:55:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 37
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Psychopathic Vanity Award

"I have body image issues, therefore, girls worldwide should have to grow up without their eyes."

Quote# 121717

BrokenIndigoCrayons recently made a thread entitled "95% of female newborns should be blinded by doctors" and I have to confess that I agree with him.

Usually that's the point where normies show up to "debate" us. They want to refute our "arguments" and react surprised when we accuse them of attacking us, "I'm not attacking or belittling you, we're just having a discussion".

But there is no debate to be had:

* I don't want to be laughed at.
* I don't want to be looked at with disgust.
* I don't want to be compared to Chad.
* I don't want to be afraid to go out in public.
* I don't want women to see me.

All of that (and some more) can be summed up in the sentence "Women should be blinded at birth".

These feelings are real. They are not up for discussion. You don't get to tell me what my lived experience is. You don't get to tell me how I am allowed to feel.

Arguing that me not wanting women to see me is not real, that me not wanting women to see me is not true, that me not wanting women to see me makes me a horrible person is not ok. There is no "just having a discussion", you are attacking and belittling me at every step of your stupid "arguments".

Are normies really so delusional that they cannot see how they are reinterpreting an expression of vulnerability and emotion as some kind of proposal for political action that must be debated and stopped? Don't they recognize that every step of these strawman discussions is about denying our incel experience?

Most of the "discussion" on this subreddit involves one person laying out their hurt and feelings while another person does his or her best to invalidate them one by one in the spirit of what he or she either believes or at least pretends to be believe to be a reasoned discussion. That's not how successful communication works.

PorphyriosMalik, Reddit - /r/Incels 86 Comments [9/22/2016 2:44:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 36

Quote# 97806

I guess what I don’t understand is how someone as self aware as you can deal with knowing how utterly inferior your gender is to men. I’m sure if you were black you would be miserable as you would hate being an inferior race, so why doesn’t it bother you to be an inferior sex?

Also, as a Hindu, how do you deal with the possibility that in a past incarnation you were ugly, stupid or black? Which would be the “real” FeministX: the ugly/stupid/black one of previous incarnations or the one you are now?

Otis the Sweaty, The Little Spoon 17 Comments [11/23/2013 4:15:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 35

Quote# 122169

The primary contribution any woman can make for science is to stay completely out of it. No matter how good she is, no matter how smart she is, she cannot possibly compensate for the complete devastation and distraction she is going to leave in her wake over the course of her career among the socially and sexually hapless gammas who might have otherwise happily spent decades slaving away in the laboratories.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 43 Comments [10/22/2016 5:17:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 33

Quote# 97124

[On extending protection to male rape victims]

And this also gets to the heart of my objection to applying the victimhood mantle to the male. Making men as physically helpless and violable as contemporary feminists hold women to be is a form of social castration. One of the defining characteristics of masculinity is the possession of agency — the ability to act. Take this away and we are slaves, so removing this from men – even with a concept ostensibly meant to “protect” men – leads us down a hole, at the bottom of which we find ourselves bereft of our manhood both culturally and legally. And make no mistake: many people really do want to rob men of their manhood. Male feminist Michael Kimmel has made a career of it.

This is not to say that men cannot be victimized or real victims; they clearly can and this has always been recognized. But the most effective means of victimizing men has always been to reduce them to a state in which they are incapable of protecting themselves and acting in their own interests, and this is accomplished as easily by feminizing them as by direct force of arms.

When a woman appeals to people for help and protection, she is engaged in an empowering act. When men rush to a woman’s aid, it demonstrates her female potency. When her “needs” are met by others, it does not detract from but rather adds to her status. For ancient, immutable reasons, this does not apply to men.

The man who cries “help” feels a certain shame. When he must apply for welfare, it is humiliating and emasculating. That men must swallow their pride and do so from time to time is a given, but almost all of us recognize that it is far from ideal when the necessity presents itself. Ideally, the man has agency, and can fend for himself. In a society that valued men, steps would be taken to ensure that men have the opportunity to do so. A society that enshrines male victimhood is the exact opposite.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 25 Comments [10/19/2013 6:43:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 33

Quote# 97692

Given the disposable nature of the male, it makes no sense to presume that they have the same capability of experiencing deeper emotions that the female possesses. Males shouldn’t really be capable of the same level of suffering, and it would be an inefficient allocation of resources to help them with things like rape and violence. Even in the unlikely event that they could experience deeper emotions, the allocation of resources to protect “innocent” males would be much more efficiently allocated helping “innocent” females, as their existence and health is more valuable to population stability. Why waste money for feel-good notions like “equality” or “justice”? These are simply subjective platitudes that apes made up in order to derive some sense of control over an indifferent and random world. They hold no objective value. Efficiency is at least quantifiable.

Unphysicalism,  Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men 24 Comments [11/17/2013 5:04:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 32

Quote# 103091

In a recently published VICE interview, she explains femitheism as follows: "I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class – a far more valued class – having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death."

To be fair, she doesn't believe that men should be slaughtered, but that they should be gradually phased out of the population through genetic engineering and possibly selective abortions. And she claims that these steps would not be mandated, "at first," but merely encouraged. Children would very much designed, and raised communally by the state. "Perfect girls will be conceived, developed, and engineered in state-owned breeding centers. They will be bound together in a communal venue under the instruction and control of female savants."

The few men that are left would be kept on their own reservations and used only for breeding, possibly some light labor. When asked if she acknowledged that some men have ambitions beyond "luxury breeding pens," she answered: "Some would argue it would be a dystopian world because it wouldn't be free in the present conventional sense. However that is misguided. It will be utopian because it will be a world almost without conflict where people cooperate and are treated properly within a well-engineered and long-forged system. If everything is great for almost everyone the point is null."

Femitheist Divine, Outer Places 68 Comments [9/1/2014 3:38:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 104365

We could also say that men are simple biological machines as well, as they would fuck basically anything if allowed.

That’s why we need extremely strict rules and harsh punishments for both genders when it comes to things like adultery. A man who commits adultery with another man’s wife must know he will, if discovered, die.

Also, you’re once again incredibly naive. If you support women’s suffrage you can’t support female premarital chastity. I mean, you can, but that’s insane, as it makes no sense and is contradictory.

A woman's suffrage is a feminist policy and means that women will vote themselves priviledges that will enable them to be sluts.

It’s like saying you support democracy but won’t support something the demos votes for – not possible.

Your ideas are like saying “I support billions being thrown into war machine but I oppose war.”


caamib, CoAlphaAntiModernistIncelBlogger 82 Comments [10/28/2014 3:09:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 100709

Reminds me of Marabel Morgan's 1973 book The Total Woman. Morgan was in the social circle of the wives of Miami Dolphins football players and witnessed how a large percentage of these pampered young wives were destroying their marriages by turning into slovenly nags, so she wrote an advice book teaching her friends two things.

The first was time management. Hey girls: get your small half of the division of labor within your marriages done early, so you don't feel unhappy and bitchy about cleaning, grocery shopping, cooking etcetera on account of only getting it done at the last minute and under pressure. Get your stuff done early and you can feel great about yourselves while you go about your "me" time shoe-shopping or whatever, instead of feeling guilty about getting nothing done all day.

The second was to tell these women that in their conflicts with their husbands, THEY were the problem, not the husbands. These pampered young wives were always trying to vie for power in their relationships by doing stupid things like withholding sex because their husband hadn't taken out the trash yet. They were following female instincts to find grounds on which to see themselves as wronged, which they would then try to use as leverage. In short, these wives were not self-controlled and needed a man to control them, to not tolerate their bitchiness, but how many men are up to that without getting pissed off and alienated? These guys were stud athletes. That didn't make them extraordinary men who had any special talent for dealing with irrationally demanding women.

So Morgan tried to teach the women how to control themselves. She told them not to try to gain and use manipulative power in their marriages but do the opposite. Instead of holding back affection until they got what they wanted the wives were advised to unilaterally disarm: to give freely and generously, to stop nagging, to be hot for sex regardless of what else was going on the the relationship, and it worked.

All these wives discovered that it had indeed been them who was the problem. When they became forthcoming and generous their husbands did not grab the offered territory and demand still more. They didn't become oppressive. Instead they became MORE willing to do their part of the household division of labor. They reciprocated, and were just happy that their wives were not being bitches anymore, making them want to be with their wives more and make their wives happy.

The feminists absolutely hated it. The idea that women were the problem, not men, went against all of their ideology. But there is obviously a lot of truth to it: in very many cases women ARE the problem, and for that large fraction of cases the advice to stop being a bitch is important wisdom. Neither does it do any harm to women who aren't bitches to see someone lay out the ways in which a lot of other women ruin their marriages.

Then there are the feminists, that small minority of women who embrace self-destructive bitchiness, who don't want to be givers and don't want other women to be givers, but want all women to be as demanding and stingy as possible. That's their fight against men. They are in a constant tug of war.

Alexander Rawls, The Telegraph 31 Comments [4/28/2014 3:34:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 107468

Puahater/sluthater here to shake up this echo chamber. Look David, as an obese unattractive guy, why do you devote your life’s work to being a white knight for women who only want to fuck Chads and cuckold beta male boyfriends and hubbies? Join the dark side. I invite every beta male on this blog to join the dark side and fight for men’s rights together.

You want to know why I joined the dark side? Society has treated me like shit all my life because I’m an autistic manlet. Society made me who I am. And one day I woke up and decided that I was going to stop being subservient to a society that enslaves us and treats us like yesterday’s garbage. I decided to go my own way. I don’t owe society shit. We’re going to red pill as many men and female allies (like MRA Karen Straughan) as we possibly can. Every single one of you white knight beta cucks will be red pilled and see the truth. You’ll stop being white knights. You’ll stop being cucks. You’ll be disciplines and acolytes of the Red Pill church.

And together we will put our bodies upon the gears, the levers, upon all the apparatus until we make it all stop. Until western civilization collapses. If we all go our own way and drop out of society, society will crash. Society can’t function without beta males. If it wasn’t for beta male engineers, there would be no Tinder for sluts to hook up with Chads. You beta males. You are the difference in the world. Stop being cucks. And join us.

Society has done nothing for you David. You’re obese and ugly. No girl wants to fuck you unless she wants to use you for beta bux. You owe nothing to society. Join the dark side.

Why should we be nice to girls and pretend to take an interest in their lives when these bitches fuck Chad without a condom on the first date without any effort? Why should we buy bitches dinner and drinks. Wine and dine them and jump hoops in order to get laid when Chad gets it instantly and for free? Beta males need to boycott dating and boycott society.


Puahater/sluthater, We Hunted The Mammoth 72 Comments [3/30/2015 3:33:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 27
Submitted By: Skybison

Quote# 102117

The worst White Knights are always the feminized gamma fathers:

Vox Day ?@voxday Jul 9
Darwin + Title IX = Idiocracy. The more women are educated, the less intelligent society becomes.

Paul Mikelson ?@pablo79raider
@voxday my daughters will be educated so they don't have to rely on some asshole for their next meal.

Vox Day ?@voxday now
@pablo79raider In that case, you should probably buy them their starter cats now.

It's probably small loss to society. One tends to doubt anyone would have been terribly inclined to enwife the guy's little orcs anyhow.

Vox Day, Alpha Game 33 Comments [7/16/2014 3:09:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 27

Quote# 101835

Feminism, because it denies human nature, is a profoundly inhuman philosophy. When put into practice it hurts people, just like Stalinism and Maoism. Not just a few people, but millions of them — from children on up to grandparents.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 33 Comments [7/1/2014 5:10:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 26

Quote# 107760

The popular narrative today is that women demanded the right to vote and the menfolk just told them no until they got tired of their whining. After all, why wouldn’t a woman want more rights?

Turns out there are plenty of reasons why most women would want their own rights restricted, and they all have to do with women knowing the true nature of women. As the saying goes, “A misogynist is a man who hates women as much as women hate each other.” Women know exactly how terrible they can be. A feminist friend of mine once told me, “I envy men, because you can put two random guys in a college dorm together and they’ll get along, but that never happens with two random girls.”

The anti-suffragist organizations had the same numbers among women in America and the United Kingdom as the suffragist organizations, often even excluding men from joining. More women than men were opposed to women’s suffrage. In fairness, some of these groups supported women’s suffrage in local elections.

But all of them feared the hell that would be spawned from complete women’s suffrage, namely the soft socialism we live in today. Ever notice how everything Obama says is pro-woman but that he’s dialed-down his pro-black agenda? It’s because women are the only fans he still has left. Even the blacks don’t want him anymore.

Here’s a few reasons why women themselves did not want to involve themselves in politics.

Less Than Feminine

It’s unbecoming for a woman to be caught up in the affairs of politics. It just isn’t sexy. Nobody likes an activist. A woman doped up on Fox News or HuffPo is as disturbing as your stepmother screaming at the referee at a high school basketball game.

Women get passionate about things, often that whichever her man is passionate about. This can be a very good thing in the right contexts. In the wrong contexts, it’s terrifying. A friend of mine used to be big into Rush Limbaugh, and he decided to involve his wife in his passion. But she was a psychopath in general, and he became horrified at this terrifying right-wing beast he had created. He saw her general hatred and cruelty magnified in her political views.


Be as offended as you want, but how many women have you met who were bitter, aggressive, and antagonistic over their political views? Why would a woman want to turn into that? And how many more women than men have you met with that demeanor? Being married to a woman invested in politics or social theory is like being married to that one passive-aggressive co-worker who is best friends with the manager.

Today more women than men vote, especially single women, although married women vote more often than single women. Single women are more likely to vote Democrat than married women, and men are more likely to vote Republican than either of them. Whether it’s the financial support or the moral guidance of a husband, women tend to be right-wing when influenced by a man (hence why the left keeps trying to destroy the nuclear family).

And if you are a man who votes Democrat, then yes, you vote like a girl. And probably the kind of ugly girl no man wants to commit to instead of the young hot Presbyterian Sunday school teacher.

Part of the reason women tend to vote Democrat is because women are terrible with money and math. This is the same reason kids are taught in school to pursue their dream job instead of learning a trade that will provide a secure income.

Bad For The Family

Ultimate History Project writes,

One year later, on April 3, 1914, [Theodore Roosevelt’s cousin-in-law Kate] Roosevelt’s diary mentions Mrs. Martin speaking at the home of Mrs. Henry Seligman, wife of the millionaire banker…According to the Times, Mrs. Martin proceeded to tear to tatters the great new cause. The audience listened to her demolition of the suffrage movement “We are not merely against feminism, but for the family. We cannot reconcile feminism and the family. We hope to hear the sound of women’s feet, walking away from the factory and back to the home.”

Notice the idea of suffrage is connected to women in careers. Ideas do not exist in isolation. The barefoot and pregnant Catholic housewife with five children is a far happier person than the sulky feminist writer who retires to squeeze out a retarded child in her late 30s conceived through in vitro.

Women often don’t transition well from the office to the home, becoming bored and listless after being used to the high energy (and germophobic) environment of work. Furthermore, the reason feminist writers think careers are fulfilling is because writing feminist literature is fun. Most women (and men) don’t have careers—they have jobs where they work at the grocery store and hate life.

This claim that women’s entrance into politics and the workforce would destroy the family was not merely the anti-suffrage position. The suffragists themselves admitted that a war between the sexes was a major reason they wanted the right to vote.


If you look at history, democracy has rarely worked well. It is not rule by the majority but rule by the loudest. And who is louder than a woman? Who is more passionate? And when women follow others like lemmings, we see that women’s suffrage can quickly become destructive.

True, the monarch could be oppressive, take away your rights, censor speech, enact things that the most people are opposed to, and often make the common people miserable and impoverished. But how is that any different than modern western democracies? At least the monarch could accomplish things. Our government can’t get anything done except throw away money.

Furthermore, the monarch has the all-seeing God, his family legacy, and anxious nobles with small armies breathing down his neck to help make sure he does what’s best for the country. In the democracy, it’s greedy corporations and small minorities of activists who control the political narrative. Which is the lesser evil?



We have this idea as a society that we are constantly getting smarter with each generation. Yet if you read old books, you find that man has gradually become stupider over the centuries. Even just 100 years ago, people—both men and women—still had the common sense to not shoot themselves in the foot over women’s issues.

Today we have this sense of rights in general, like we are entitled by God at best and by Nothing at worst to have certain laws in place. Where God or Nothing promised this to us is beyond me.

The liberal atheist believes in these human rights more than anyone, even though he doesn’t believe in a god and therefore has no basis for his natural law philosophy. At the least it would make sense for him to believe in whatever is either the oldest or the most universal morality, but instead most atheists jump ahead to whatever new moral fad will fill the emptiness. Just because religion is the opium of the masses doesn’t mean mankind doesn’t need an opium.

The religious person isn’t any more off the hook. Nowhere in the Bible is tolerance, equality, or democracy mentioned, and I doubt they are very prevalent in other religions. The Bible doesn’t say much about politics, but one could make the best guess that while a king may or may not be appointed by God, a senator or president is clearly appointed by man, and therefore democracy isn’t Biblical.

Blair Naso, Return of Kings 22 Comments [4/11/2015 2:53:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 25

Quote# 86453

[Response to a comic mocking Pick-Up Artists and the practice of tearing down a woman's self esteem to make her vulnerable]

This is bullshit. So we are suppose to equate ANY AND ALL attempts to pick up, go out with, or otherwise "score" with a girl as misogyny against or objectification of women? Further, we are also suppose to believe that acting on these ideas is simply a mental defect in our brains completely insurmountable; ie. If you cannot get a girlfriend, its because there is something wrong with your brain?

In an ideal world you'd be able to be honest and straight with women about your intentions and eventually everything would work out. Do you want to date? You would get a simple yes/no answer. You want casual sex? Also a yes/no answer. ANY guy who has put himself out there knows this peaches and roses scenario does not exist and never will. You have to be cool. You have to be smooth. You have to pretend not to care. You have to flirt. You have to act natural at the same time. etc.

He does not realize it but the "pick-up artist" of this comic is actually the winner here. This woman he's taken an interest in has proven herself to be an utter bitch. Better to be single than to be with a stuck-up snot who believes in some sort of genetic superiority based on intellect (the foundation of said belief being completely rooted in pseudo-science).

With all due respect- actually, fuck that. Fuck you, Randall. I don't care if I get banned since I don't care to read your comic EVER again. This is too close to home. Bookmark deleted; no more recommendations.

XKCD Fan, XKCD forums 83 Comments [3/15/2012 3:40:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: Shockna

Quote# 133985

“Psychopath.” “Misogynist.” “Narcissist.”

Hardly a day goes by without me getting called one of these names.

Shogun Method has made me, Derek Rake, a villain.

I’ve been vilified by the press (a major newspaper columnist called me a “sadomasochistic, chauvinist hog”), hated on by hardcore feminists (I get emails threatening to “cut my balls” all the time) and despised by a colluding gang of “Pickup Artists” and “Seduction Gurus” (for calling them out on their bullshit advice.)

And yet, frankly, I don’t care.

The word has to get out.


The truth is that when it comes to dating and relationships, guys have always gotten the short end of the stick.

In the modern times, men are the new women. Period.

How so? Well, we have been conditioned to allow women to walk all over us, mentally and emotionally. We have given up on our masculinity in order to make women happy (often times at the expense of our own happiness.)


There are no two ways about it… we must take the power back.

(And with Shogun Method, we will.)

Listen here. It’s entirely un-political correct to say this, but it’s true:

Women are born manipulators.

Lying and deception is probably hard-wired into their DNA by nature.

When a woman gets into a relationship with a guy, her natural instinct is to find ways to pussy-whip him into lifelong subservience.

No fucking joke.

And to make things worse, most guys don’t even know that they’re being manipulated like wooden puppets at a carnival show.


On the other hand, Shogun Method is exactly what you need if any ONE of the following describes you:

You don’t merely want women to be attracted to you. You want to put them under your control and domination for as long as you want.
You’re done with dating around, and you want to settle down with one special woman that you want to be with for the long term.
Your woman is losing interest in you, and you need to rekindle her attraction to you, fast.
Another guy is in the picture, and you want to destroy that jerk-off so that she only has eyes for you.
You want a stable relationship which is free of drama, mind games and emotional turmoil.
You’re tired of being the “nice guy“, and you want women to respect you for the man you are.
You’re sick of getting stuck in the friend zone, and you want women to see you as a potential lover.
You’re willing to use psychological manipulation techniques on women to get what you want.

If ANY ONE of the above describes your situation, then congratulations – Shogun Method absolutely fits the bill.
Why It’s Not Enough To “Seduce” A Woman… You Got To ENSLAVE Her

Have you ever wondered why most “Pickup” or “Seduction” advice programs fail?

Well, here’s the answer:

As its namesake would suggest, “Pickup” or “Seduction” tricks are good for what it says on the box… for “picking up” and “seducing” women.

To control and dominate a woman, “seduction” is not enough, my friend. You’ve got to ENSLAVE her.

You see, if your woman is losing interest in you, there could only be one reason, and it’s this…

It’s because you didn’t take the final step to enslave her to you.

You’d have realized that it’s just as easy for her to fall OUT of love with you as she fell IN love with you.

On the other hand, ENSLAVEMENT is a one-way street.

Once a woman is enslaved to you, she’s pretty much yours… forever.

See the difference?
Four Steps To Eternal Enslavement – The IRAE Model

So how do enslave a woman to you then?

Answer: in four simple steps.

These steps or stages are summarized into what we call the IRAE Model –

The first stage is the “I” stage – Intrigue Generation
The second stage is the “R” stage – Rapport Building
The third stage is the “A” stage – Attraction Development
The fourth (and final) stage is the “E” stage – Enslavement

These stages are strictly sequential: it means that one follows another in a strict, step-by-step sequence.


Enslavement Stage

There’s only one Shogun Sequence in the Enslavement stage, and it is the Black Rose Sequence (which we will describe in the next section.)
What Is The Black Rose Sequence?

The endpoint of the Shogun Method is Enslavement.

(Befittingly, it’s also the fourth and the final IRAE stage.)

The Enslavement stage is divided into two steps:

First, you’ll segregate her by isolating her from the outside world.

(This is done by using a combo of techniques which are similar to what cult leaders use to build a following which is completely fanatical to their cause.)

Then, when she is sufficiently isolated, you’ll then perform an Enslavement routine on her called the Black Rose Sequence.

Here’s what it does:

It “erases” a woman’s existing identity, and a new identity (named “Persephone”) is installed in its place.

“Persephone” is designed to be completely enslaved to you emotionally, and psychologically programmed to need you to survive.

(In other words, in her mind, quitting you is a sheer impossibility.)

The Enslavement module inside Shogun Method contains the complete Black Rose Sequence in all its glory – all the scripts and action steps you need to take are here.

Before you use the Black Rose on a woman, you must remember two things:

She must have gone through all the preceding IRAE stages with you (Intrigue, Rapport and Attract) – otherwise you’ll come across as a downright psychopath to her, and
You can’t “undo” the Enslavement effect. Once she is Enslaved to you, it’s possibly forever.

Look: I won’t deny that the Black Rose is somewhat sinister (because frankly, it is).

There’s nothing which is going to stop someone from going on a rampage and using the Black Rose on everyone he meets… leaving behind a disastrous trail of Enslaved females with damaged psyche.

Make no mistake… the danger is very real.

Shogun Method is not a game.

Only join us if you reckon you can deal with its consequences.

Derek Rake, Derek Rake 21 Comments [11/9/2017 1:36:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 119339

Women enjoy being raped

Did you know women often orgasm during rape? Isn't that weird? Most of them can't even get off with their own man, but need a creepy nigger lurking the streets at night to get it going.

James, 24 Comments [5/30/2016 4:58:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 123766

"No is because you don’t actually feel sorry for these people. To things like you stories of horrific assaults are just wank material for you."

I do feel sorry for people who get unjustified sentences due to maniacs like you and I don't wank on stories of horrific assaults. In fact, even as late as 2013 I COULDN'T GET IT UP WHEN A WOMAN I COERCED INTO SEX WAS THRASHING BELOW ME WHEN I TRIED TO PUT IT IN HER, despite the fact that 1. she came to my home 2. we already arranged what prize she should be given 3. she even blew me to get me hard to finally put it her 4. we even joked around later that day. This changed drastically later but what you don't understand is that most "horrific assaults" done to women today is caused by feminism, which made decent men unable to get consensual sex. That's why they must resort to rape - because consensual sex in the West is basically impossible to get unless you're really, really evil. There's exceptions but they're extremely rare.

" Hell one of your pedophile friends on you Wordpress blog asked a women victim to detail her date rape"

And what is wrong about this? Unlike maniacs like you, I don't fetishize rape to be some greatest crime and trauma on Earth. Oh, wait, neither do you if the rapist isn't a white male, and you'd let your mothers and sisters be raped by classes you see as underprivileged. But let's get back to this. This woman was under no obligation to reply so what? Btw, you know who also asks this of women who claim to have been raped? Institutions like courts do. Another thing you'd like to do away with !

"I made sure to spread his profile around to people who are willing to contact him and tell him what he outta do."

Where? To my e-mail? Nobody is even sending me any hate mail these days. Everybody knows I just get a kick out of it.

"Because of people like you I have the job that I have, out of all the hundreds of kids I’ve seen only 36 were abused by “child molesters.” "

If that's true I'd fear for the safety of anybody working with or being around such an insane, hysterical person. Adults, children, whatever. You are the ones with skeletons in your closet, I am probably not talking metaphorically. Just look at your post.

" The rest were attacked by pedophiles, pedophiles who caused lasting physical and mental injuries. Injuries so horrific some adults don’t even recover let alone a 3-year old who is repeatedly raped."

This isn't what Eivind is talking about, but now that you mention it I'll be honest - I'm not sorry. Regardless if kids were male or female, not sorry. I hate 99,9 percent of modernist Westerners and want only the worse for them. If some get abused, traumatized or even killed I don't care, no matter what the age. They would or are to grow up as bad, bad people. You are a grown up Westerner and you're a bad person. And so will/would they be.

" Pedophiles who drove 15 of these kids to kill themselves, deaths that I personally witnessed..... I’ve witnessed countless other suicide attempts by crazed victims who want their nightmares to stop....t. She killed herself when she was 10 years old not too long after I walked into an old run down shed after hearing her screaming and crying and telling the two pedophiles raping her to stop. Because of your kind she’s dead. I held her while she died and I will not forget that. I was 15-years old when she died, I still have the clothes I was wearing when she bled out. Her blood is still soaked into them and some days I have to struggle to not break down sobbing at that memory."

Holy shit I laughed so hard at this. This story continues here and here

Also, how does a 10 year-old kill herself so efficiently? Tell me more about it. Or those 15 suicides you've witnessed.

" Your kind is a blight that must be purged. If only Hitler had killed you all, if only he could’ve killed you all, if only he didn’t target Jews and Romanis."

So aside from being utterly psychotic you also lack basic knowledge of history and think 2017 world was just like 1937 world ? Had Hitler gone after pedophiles (not that me and Eivind are that) he'd kill no more than couple of hundred of people at best even including countries he conquered, at even that's probably an overstatement. He'd have to kill just convicted ones who were convicted due to actual crimes the kind of which you describe and there were really a few people like that in 1930s. It was notoriously hard to even track who is homosexual without special lists at the time and many of the names were people who were set up for some reason while some gays were protected as long as they were useful (Ernst Röhm being a prime example of this).

". I hope someone finds you and kills you and each and every one of your baby raping friends too. "

I have never raped a baby nor has any friend that I know of. I think same goes for Eivind... You, on the other hand...

"Your kind is one without remorse or sympathy, you’re incapable of understanding right from wrong or caring about the pain you cause others."

... support blacks, Muslims or any other group you think lacks privilege raping and killing even newborns because they're Sacred according to you and cannot be held accountable. I know this and you know this. I know it in the way you write phrases like "far-right" or how you mention Trump. At the same time you want white males to have no fair trials, no hearings, just off to prisons with them. So why don't you just admit what you're all about? Because, believe me, I know what you're all about. I know you. You cannot pull the veil over my eyes. I will never stop fighting you because I know what you are. Don't forget that.

"People like you destroy lives."


"What makes you think you deserve anything good in life?"

Nothing, given that I never said this. What makes you think white males will go along with your idea that they must be exterminated but Sacreds can do as they like? What makes you think modern Western women deserve not to be raped by them?

"’m not a religious man, religion is false. But if Hell is real I hope you burn there, I hope you suffer every imaginable horror and humiliation both known and unknown."

Funny, exactly something I think about you and your kind.

" The day is coming when we’ll be able to openly kill your kind again. I can’t wait for this to happen."

There was never a day when you could have killed "our kind", given that people like me and Eivind were a majority even 50 years ago in most places. Hell, I mentioned 14 year-old eight graders with fuck buddies around 12 years ago. Nobody had a problem with this. It was seen as normal. That you equate those like Eivind and me with people who rape babies while you actually support babies being raped, just by appropriate groups of people, is why you're such a laughingstock.

No, pal, the kind of people who it will be legal to kill again soon are your kind. Liberalism didn't appear for the first time in history and always ended up with slaughter of liberals, before or after they destroyed the society which nourished them. You will be exterminated by Muslims you so worship and people like me.

You are guilty of most vicious crime in the history of the world, and that is feminism. I know what it did to me and many of my friends. There will be no forgiveness.

caamib, Eivind Berge's Blog 57 Comments [1/19/2017 10:33:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 115119

Have any of these fools thought of the political implications of telling parents that their daughters have to serve in combat? It’s hard enough for parents to stomach their sons going to war, but at least they tend to think the young man might have a fighting chance.

Women in their prime are about comparable in terms of physical ability to 14yo boys. Why not lower the age of military service to 14? What’s the difference, morally speaking? To me, one of the creepiest scenes from WWII video footage was of Hitler patting adolescent boys on the head before sending them out to die in a lost cause. Listen to the last boy. He’s a little kid. If I ever found myself sympathizing with Nazis, all I’d have to do to cure the sentiment would be to watch that clip and I’d be ready to string them up without compunction. Does Obama want to be shown sending women off to combat? Does Ash Carter?

These people are sick in the head. Women and children should only have to fight as a last resort, and our current situation is anything but that.

Bill P, Unz 31 Comments [12/8/2015 4:16:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 33943

This guy comes home from work, "Hi Honey, what's for supper?" "Whatever you're fixing." You know, she just got back from one of those meetings, those femi-nazi meetings. He said, "Honey, the house is kind of a mess, have you been busy today?" She said, "If you don't like it you clean it up." This went on for ten minutes. And finally he said, "How would you like to not see me for a week?" She said, "That would be fine with me." And sure enough on the the seventh day her left eye started to open just a little bit.

Kent Hovind, 118 Comments [1/22/2008 10:31:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: Eileen

Quote# 103875

I live in an apartment right in the heart of college rentals. Sitting right on my front porch, I watch it unfold before my very eyes. It's things I've been cogniscent of for awhile, but after watching this Oktoberfest weekend, I felt so assured of the things I've been tossing around in my mind for years.
Rape served a very important function in mitigating female behavior and keeping it in check. Back in the time of prehistory, a woman couldn't behave as shamelessly slutty as she can today, because of the risk of catching the eye of the wrong male. But now, with "consent" laws barring nature back, and feminism and sexual-liberation perverting whole generations of hearts and minds, we find ourselves in a situation gone way, way, too far.
These harpies need to be humbled. And for their own good. Like the child with absolutely no boundaries and no discipline, they may feel they yearn for no rules, but become absolutely lost without an adult to tell them no! If you've ever met such a kid, the type who can have anyone over, at anytime, and do anything, is miserable. The insertion of an authority figure who deals out punishment is met with intense anger and resistance. But the discipline is what was so badly needed. The slaps and smacks may smart, but it helps the child have some semblance of direction as they develop.
These hussies are so far gone, living in a world that is a virtual macrocosm for them of the home for the child with the completely negligent, permissive parent. Disciplinary smacks and slaps come in a different form for these more grown children (college women), since the situation was more extreme in permissiveness and went on for more years. But the curing power of good ol' fashion physical strength wielded to correct can not be understated.
It's not only morally justifiable to rape such a woman, it's and brave.
At the risk of stating the obvious, this isn't true for all female human beings. We're not talking about nuns or grandmothers or humble, married, women of twenty years.
We're talking about filthy, unmitigated, sluts. Oblivious and loud. Shameless. Belligerent. Entitled. Selfie taking, Tindr-whoring, Teenage-walking-herpes-sores. We are talking about bad, bad, individuals. Unruly, neglicted, children, run-amok. That badly need to be punished. Badly.
For the good of society these women need to be raped.
Here we will teach how to do it safely.

ThePhilosophyOfRape, Reddit 30 Comments [12/1/2014 3:21:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: GalvatronPrime

Quote# 104974

Well, I think violence because of incel can manifest itself in a couple of ways. Remember when I told you that I mourned that very aggressive girl for 2 years? She became an absolute Goddess to me, a mythical creature. She took 95 percent of my thoughts. I fantasized about murdering her because I just couldn’t stand thinking about her anymore, it was as if I felt (this is very symbolical and abstract but try to understand) that by killing her I will remove her from the 100 feet altar her huge statue was on. Yeah, I know it sounds crazy but you have to understand that I had nothing before her and then she came with her offers of sex and true love, just for me to screw up, which she never forgave, despite all my pleadings. Also, remember that I had nothing two years after her so it’s hardly a surprise I turned her into a deity. I never hated her, just didn’t see her in human terms any more but as a God. This never happened to me with any girl later, it was just due to youth and inexperience. But I never really planned to kill her, it was just something I fantasized about.

GovernmentsGetGfs, Internet Observation Project 33 Comments [11/29/2014 5:55:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 103136

Depending on the girl she’ll hit her true bloom somewhere near nineteen years old and hold it for a maximum of five years. She can continue to be sexy into her late twenties but the unmistakeable radiance diminishes.

I believe how a woman conducts herself determines the length of her bloom.

Put simply, “good girls” who follow a healthy lifestyle and identify with the feminine last longer than “bad girls” who chart a path through hedonistic waters. The following bad habits ravage a girl’s radiance:
?Excessive drinking. Men are constituionally far more capable of holding their beer over time than women. It’s not merely because a man’s physique is less important in determining his overall value. Women who drink even 10 units a week are seriously messing up their hormones, their shape, and their skin.
?Excessive cock-hopping. Sex in itself adds to a woman’s glow but sex with different men detracts from it. A woman who gets herself fucked 500 times by one guy she loves will look good. If the same woman spreads those fucks across 30 guys she will look like shit.
?Excessive careerism. Women are not designed to carry the weight of the world on their shoulders. Look at photos of Clint Eastwood or Charles Bronson. When a man carries responsibility he takes on a weathered look that adds value. A weathered woman looks horrible

Krauser PUA, Krauser PUA Adventures 40 Comments [9/3/2014 3:30:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 128064

Jennifer Mayers, Distractify 38 Comments [6/12/2017 7:48:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Hu's On First

Quote# 126940

In good families, parents should ensure sisters fuck their brothers to help them build confidence

Families need to stick together, sisters today only make their brothers' lives worse by existing and taking his resources, flaunting boyfriends in his face and not giving a shit about his well being as evident from many examples including ER.

I can only agree completely. Incest is hot as fuck.

Sisters, cousins, moms, or any other family females. Should be registered as property of the head of the household or oldest male. He can just do whatever he wants, no laws, no rights for females.

livinginhell101, r/incels 27 Comments [5/7/2017 1:43:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 124935

[Talking about a 19 year-old girl who was raped and murdered by two immigrants in Germany]

With all this in mind, who was Maria Ladenburger? Well, her Wikipedia article says she was a German medical student who died when she was almost 20 and unmarried (search results on other sites say she was a daughter of some EU official but that is less important for the quantitative part).

So let us try to bring statistics into this equation. This amusing Durex study shows that she was likely not a virgin. These stats show that it was about 35 percent likely she would have a child out of wedlock in just 2014 (Table 3) and that her chances of being married at all were… well, getting slimmer every year, with a slight change upwards in 2014 (Table 1). That is if she would ever have kids – luckily, there’s Muslims. Now, we can speculate this or that on her personality. Obviously none of us knew her. But even using just some quickly found statistics one can easily see why Maria Ladenburger was, like most young Western European women, likely on her way to be a slut who was to be childless or have a child out of wedlock. And bear in mind, she was not even 20. All the indicators I outlined here will get worse, not better. As one character from a TV show I used to watch said “I know it’s tragic to think that way but you can’t argue with the fucking logic !”

Qualitatively, things are a bit more tricky as they go into the emotional aspect which can’t be expressed with just numbers. But I’ll argue that they’re covered well enough. Most decent, moral men have their horror stories with women. Along with my February 2014 text, I highly recommend these stories written on CoAlpha forums in September 2015. One of the worst problems with anecdotal, qualitative evidence is that you can always find some moron whose stories with Western women were happy and most of our idiocratic society will find his story to be more uplifting and credible because the author is mainstream, even if it’s obvious by the way he acts later that his success was due to the fact that he was a massive asshole and as dumb as dirt. But, I won’t go into that any longer, seeing I already covered it and concluded that one must make their own conclusions on whether or not today’s Western women are worth it.

Maria Ladenburger was likely to become everything or at least most of things this blog is so vehemently against. Her parents’ money would likely ensure that she is protected from any consequences of her future shenanigans and that she is able to proceed with these on a high level. She was likely rotten even at the time of her death and even more likely to become rotten very soon. And she was, like current women in Trump’s USA, not to improve if some right wing party had won the elections. Had she lived, she would very likely be a source of trauma for every decent man in Germany (well, um, both of them) who was unlucky enough to see potential for anything more serious than careless pump and dump in her. She would almost certainly be a pest, let us be honest, Westerners. She is the kind of girl who would reject you for treating her respectfully so you can be called an asshole and a “nice guy” by her brain-dead army of liberal virginal fanatics (whose ultimate prize isn’t pussy anyway but being loyal soldiers of their own tragedies) if you object in any way while the moron with an IQ of 20 fucking her somehow has “actual personality” – a stance these loyal liberals would hold as long as those being annoyed with Maria are members of the appropriate groups one is allowed to hate (you can usually tell them by the color of their skin and lack of gay mannerisms).

With its brain-dead youth, assholish majority of population and complete internalization of cancerous social policies like feminism West is dying old man. So Maria was a sad but a necessary victim of a situation where West has forfeited its reproductive, economic and every other future to a stronger group like Muslims.

Caamib, CoAlphaAntiModernistIncelBlogger 42 Comments [2/26/2017 6:58:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 103970

I also think you credit feminist activists with developments that are better credited to penicillin, condoms, and modern medicine. Let’s be clear, women’s liberation happened because of the washing machine and World War 2. That is, it is only because of technological improvements (washer, dryer, microwave, vacuum cleaner, etc.) that housework became less than a full time job.

By denying biology, feminism has brought much unhappiness to both women and men by persuading (most) women to act like men and (many) men to act like women (though women, overall, have gotten a far worse deal).

One can make an accomodation between biology and modernity, but not if you deny biology. I mean, sure, there are some androgen cases who really are happier going to toe-to-toe with men who are ready and willing to put in 100 hours a week. But they are not very common.

There are tons of possible recommendations one could make for our civilization given the current genetic constraints on male/female behavior. But our current genetic constraints will not be constraints for long, so social engineering can run hand in hand with genetic engineering. Welcome to a world of 36-24-36 nurturing and faithful nymphomaniacs, and 6’3? broad shouldered providers.

gc, GNXP 32 Comments [10/8/2014 3:33:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 121324

I am smarter than nearly all the girls I’ve ever known.

That’s not arrogance talking: it’s the truth. Out of all the girls I’ve known, maybe three were at least as smart as me, and of that three, one is more intelligent than me. All the rest were my intellectual inferiors. I don’t hold it against them; in fact, when I run across girls who tout their “intelligence,” I feel nauseous, like I’m dealing with a pack of overeager Mormon missionaries.

One of the most dangerous delusions of modern America is the idea that girls are desirable because of how smart they are. Indeed, the idea that intelligent girls even exist in significant numbers is ridiculous. Puffed up by you-go-grrl propaganda from the media, their heads filled with lies from the universities, every girl who can spell her own name suddenly thinks she’s Einstein. Worst of all, girls think that being able to spell their own names entitles them to a good man, even when they’re bossy, defiant and lacking in feminine graces.

This is laughable.

The reality is that truly intelligent females are rare, and most girls who consider themselves “smart” are not. More importantly, the idea that men should find female intelligence attractive is as preposterous as expecting them to find hermaphroditism sexy. A girl’s most important aspects will always be her beauty, her charm and her willingness to please, with intelligence so far down the list that it might as well not be on the list.

Yet thanks to white knights artificially pumping up the egos of every girl in America, men are made to feel like freaks for considering a girl’s bust size to be more important than her ability to regurgitate Marxist tripe.

Here are my reasons why female intelligence is a fraud.
1. Few girls are actually intelligent.

This is the most important thing to know: intelligence is largely a masculine attribute. IQ testing has consistently shown that while men and females have the same mean intelligence, men have a wider standard deviation while females cluster around the middle. In layman’s terms, this means that there are more intelligent men than there are intelligent girls. At the same time, it also means that there are more unintelligent men then unintelligent girls, which is why the short bus tends to be a sausage fest. The “dumb bimbo” stereotype is a fiction invented by ugly girls.

Turns out that “boys go to Jupiter to get more stupider, girls go to college to get more knowledge” was at least half true.

This is why it’s a waste of time for smart men to cast about for a girl who is their intellectual equal: she simply doesn’t exist. You have a better chance of talking Zooey Deschanel and Ellen Page into a threesome than finding a girl who can match you in knowledge, life experience and all-around brains. You do find the occasional woman who can hold her own with men, but these exceptions don’t disprove the rule, any more than the existence of Kim Peek disproves the fact that most autistics are hand-flapping retards.

What’s really awful about this situation is that the mainstream media, invested in hiding the truth, blame men for not being able to find the right girl. “You’re looking in the wrong places.” “Intelligent, classy girls don’t hang out at bars.” “Maybe you just attract the wrong kinds of people.” They can’t simply admit that females are the passive sex, built for raising babies and not much else, because doing so might hurt girls’ self-esteem… and we can’t very well have that, now can we?
2. Girls are intellectually inferior.

Several months ago, I was on Twitter killing time when some teenage girl started sending rude and insulting Tweets at me because she was offfeeennnded at my article on why most girls shouldn’t bother going to college. I initially ignored her, but when she continued to harass me, touting her “4.0 GPA” and how smart she was, I clicked through to her profile and did a little research. Turns out that this oh-so-intelligent young lady was spending $58,000 a year to major in acting. Furthermore, while she was not unattractive—she had a good bone structure, a cute face and huge… tracts of land—she was at least twenty pounds overweight, so several of my followers started calling her fat. What was her response?

She started sending pictures of herself to me in an attempt to prove she wasn’t fat.

This girl wasn’t stupid; she was clearly four or five points above the mean female IQ. But not only did she massively overrate her intelligence, she was unwilling to accept that maybe, just maybe, she had made some poor choices in life.

That is the modern “intelligent” girl; an intellectual vacuum. Her life one great big fraud from beginning to end. Despite her vaunted “smarts” and her belief that she can “do anything,” she doesn’t major in math, engineering, computer programming or any discipline that requires actual work. No, she picks a soft major like English, education or ethnic studies, where there are no standards and you can pass any nonsense in for a grade so long as you sound authoritative. She rationalizes her choices by saying that she wants to “help the children” or she’s “interested in learning,” despite the fact that all American education does is teach people to memorize Marxist nonsense and repeat it back word for word.

Claiming that girls are intelligent because they earn the majority of degrees is like saying that parrots are intelligent because the majority of them can mimic human speech.

When she graduates, assuming she isn’t spat right back into the service industry, she’ll go to work as a government bureaucrat, HR commissar, paralegal or other profession that contributes nothing to society. She’ll complain about the pay gap even as she takes every day off she can because her “head hurts” or she “needs some time off with the girls.” She’ll whine about the lack of girls in management roles even as she plans to quit her job when she has kids… but not until she’s in her thirties, of course.

After all, she wants to “have fun” first and “get it out of [her] system” before she settles down.

But it’s in her choice of hobbies that the modern “smart” girl truly exposes her vacuity. She doesn’t spend her free time reading science textbooks or perfecting her chess game: she TiVoes Teen Mom and obsesses over Lena Dunham’s cleavage. If she reads books at all, she limits herself to trashy mainstream thrillers like The Hunger Games or textual pornography like Twilight. Her weekends are spent pumping chumps for peach daiquiris at the dive bar and getting pumped by every stud who stirs her loins. Even so-called “nerd girls” are phonies, as their “nerdiness” extends to playing video games once in a blue moon or re-Tweeting charlatans like Neil deGrasse Tyson.

The only thing separating her from a ghetto baby momma is the ability to form complete sentences.

Face it: the vast majority of girls are as hollow as a drum. The three or four surplus IQ points that college-educated girls have are wasted on them, because all they’re used for is rationalizing a life of mindless consumption and sluttiness. If the modern West is a cesspool, girls are its most devoted coprophages, gulping down runny diarrhea by the bucketload with forced smiles on their faces.
3. Girls know that their “intelligence” is a lie.

As loudly as they brag about their “strength” and “independence,” girls know inside that their credentials are worthless in the eyes of men. Go back to that chubby acting major who started insulting me on Twitter. Me pointing out that her degree was worthless didn’t faze her, nor did my reminding her that she was wasting sixty grand a year for it. It was calling her fat—insulting her looks—that wounded her most deeply.

And she was so insecure that she resorted to begging for validation from me, a man she considered a “misogynist.”

The vagina is the perfect representation of the nature of females. An empty vessel, a hole, a void with no identity of its own. Without a man to fill her with his essence, she is as useless as a crabapple rotting on the sidewalk. Only by taking that essence deep inside her can she mature and become the woman she was meant to be. And filled with the wrong essence, she becomes an intellectual Typhoid Mary, mindlessly infecting others with her diseases of the mind.

That’s the problem with girls today: they’re so full of bullshit that their eyeballs are brown.

That bullshit is pumped into their skulls by men. Every advance in “women’s rights” occurs only because men allow it to occur. Women’s suffrage was only passed into law in the U.S. because leftist Protestants in the Republican Party wanted to ensure an electoral majority for Prohibition and other “social purity” policies. Sexual liberation only happened in the sixties because cowardly draft-dodging hippies, knowing they could not compete with real men for the affections of feminine women, encouraged girls to slut it up so they could get laid. The mass entry of girls into college and the workforce was instigated by corporate capitalists in order to drive down wages and smash workers’ rights.

If at any point, men had collectively told girls no, they would have quieted down and gone back to the kitchen like they were told.

So it is with the myth of female intelligence. Girls believe they are smart, worldly and cultured because men lie and white knight for them. The gelded father telling his little princess that she can be whatever she wants to be, the slack-wristed orbiter who writes sweet nothings on her Facebook posts, the hipster nancyboy who claims he wants an “equal”: they are the enemy. Without them, the Katerinas of America would gladly kneel to their Petruchios. Because these genetic discards cannot compete with legitimate men, they encourage degeneracy in the vain hope of getting their dicks wet.

Spraying the hollyhocks with lye is the only way they can propagate their diseased seed.

As men, it is our responsibility to bring girls back to their proper place. To lead them into their natural roles as wives and mothers. We men do not choose or reward girls for their clown college degrees, their meaningless cubicle jobs, or their supposed “intelligence.” We reward them for their willingness to please us and make us happy, and in doing so make themselves happy. No amount of phony education or career “success” will scratch that deep itch in a girl’s soul: the desire to serve a man.

Not a “guy,” not a “male”: a man.

Inside every Strong, Independent Woman™ is a suppliant girl yearning to break free. I say we give that girl a hand.

Matt Forney, Matt Forney 36 Comments [8/27/2016 7:25:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 108326

[Bolding in original]

Eurasian males are the humiliated degraded broken sons of White Dads. They have no claim to their White Dad's right to white women.

Arab and Indian Men are just as rejected by white women, but at least they know how to rape them and turn them into sex slaves. Muslims are facing a Holocaust in Europe, but they are still not afraid to rape, and seduced into prostitution thousands of white girls.

You can blame dating on female choice. But the lack of Asian men raping white women, is solely the fault of the man.

Should Hapa men redeem themselves by raping white women in a revolutionary act?

"In the most controversial part of the book, Cleaver acknowledges committing acts of rape, stating that he initially raped black women in the ghetto "for practice" and then embarked on the serial rape of white women. He described these crimes as politically inspired, motivated by a genuine conviction that the rape of white women was "an insurrectionary act".[2] When he began writing Soul on Ice, he unequivocally renounced rape and all his previous reasoning about it.[4][6] However, he refused to show any remorse for his career as a rapist, or acknowledge any debt to society, claiming in Soul on Ice that "the blood of Vietnamese peasants has paid off all my debts".[2]

If a Black Panther Mormon can rape white women, using the blood of Vietnam as his excuse, how much more right do Amerasian men have?

Is the most revolutionary think Hapa boys can do rape White women who share the white race of their Fathers?

I'm not an advocate of criminality. I merely ask if Hapas are in the same revolutionary position as Eldridge Cleaver.

Is the Hapa destiny to be solved in the rape of white women?

It makes me kind of angry that they have turned me into such a loser. By letting the Asian race sink so low. Ok it is women who do the sexual selection. But Asian Men could rape more. They have so many comics about rape, but they dont actually rape. White women's opinions don't matter in rape. You can't get rejected by rape. Look at Arab men. White Europe is on the verge of having a Holocaust against Arabs, but that doesn't stop them from raping white women. Your about to be exterminated, and your still raping. That takes balls.

So yes as a Hapa guy, I do hate Asian men for not being rapists enough. Would it hurt my feelings if I had a reputation as a rapist based on my race? beats being a eunuch. rape is totally in the man's control, and asian men can't even do that. I never hear cases of Asian men raping white women. And if Arabs can do it so can they.

Am I hypocrite, since I;m not a rapist myself? Look I'm an aspie retard mutant freak, I could never pull it off. Is the whole Asian race, filled with man-children like me, who cant even rape?

Asian men have betrayed me in 2 ways. 1st they were assholes to me in person, throughout my life. and 2nd they have let their reputation and therfore my reputation sink to shit. And some forms of sex are in their control period.

manofire, CoAlpha Reactionary Forum 24 Comments [5/4/2015 3:22:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 21
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 105568

My husband is a retired master mechanic in the Air Force. He told me that the dirty little secret was that woman pilots were four times more likely to crash then men. Now this was 20 years ago. I see no reason why this might be different. He claims no one really knew what the reason was. He also said woman make very good co-pilots, better than men, because of their high tolerance for tedium and the ability to multitask. The problem with women as pilots is when something goes wrong women tend to think and men react. He said the worse crash he witnessed was when a woman flight instructor was teaching a woman pilot to land when something went wrong during landing. She hesitated then gave the wrong commands. Everyone died in that crash.He is strongly against woman fighter pilots, the planes aren’t designed for women. There is no way around the “indoor” plumbing. Not to mention she simply is not physically strong enough to withstand the G forces. She will pass out before a man.

Of course there is also the problem of intuitive fighting; women don’t seem to have it.

Jeanette V, The Thinking Housewife 54 Comments [12/31/2014 4:17:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 20

Quote# 107089



When a woman is in denial of, or declares as untrue, thehebephilic nature of human sexuality despite biological evidence. In addition, women suffering from child-bride-denial spend extensive amounts of time altering their bodies to imitate pubescent traits. Attempts to remove or mask post pubescent traits may include shaving off pubic hair, body hair, painting on larger eyes, enhancing the appearance of lips, chemically hiding under arm odor, wearing high heals, hiding child-bearing hips, changing the pitch of her voice, hiding large adult pores, etc.

As modern women grow past puberty they often develop a denial of the fact that they are no longer in their natural pubescent prime. This is A condition called ‘child-bride-denial’.

webwub, egomoral 43 Comments [3/16/2015 3:10:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 20

Quote# 123582

All sex is validating the female

If you have sex with a female, you are validating her existance. Regardless of paying or the normie way. You are telling her she is valuable for having a vagina. You are engaging in ego masturbation everytime you look at porn, google hot women, flirt with females, create an okcupid account, tinder account or w/e else. This is why in order to not validate the female further you must be alpha. You cannot engage in niceness with the female. You have to be distant but make her reliant on you. She must need you in her life so she doesn't cuck you for chad. You have to stop complimenting her. She must compliment you. Make her validate you. Give her stockholm syndrome, it will make her enamored with you and reduce her validation. She will become weakened mentally as she becomes nothing more than a mental slave.

Incel_Death1, /r/incels 53 Comments [1/11/2017 2:14:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 116830

Can't read the whole article till later but that's a very irritating little jingle they got going:

"Whatever we wear, wherever we go, yes means yes and no means no"

Well how about

"Liar, liar, bras on fire"?

But if you really want to see the incel revolution, you got to start working on trippy little chants like these:

"However we look, whatever our height, sex with girls is our human right!"

Any takers?

Antikurva, 43 Comments [2/16/2016 2:59:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 111736

Title of the posting: How come there are no women in this "all-female" Ghostbusters?

I've read that that this will be an "all-female" Ghostbusters.

I've seen a couple of publicity photos for this film.

In those photos, I did not see a single woman.

All I saw were four or so butt-ugly, monstrous, masculine brutes.

Does it not stand to reason that an "all-female" Ghostbusters should actually have women in it?

Someone messed up there, big-time!

Navaros, IMDb message board for Ghostbusters (2016) 38 Comments [8/13/2015 2:56:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Kuno

Quote# 122467

Politics is downstream of the sexual market (which is why electoral puzzles like women voting in greater numbers for the gibs and virtue signaling party is best explained as a biological repercussion of human sexuality).

All politics is gonadal. Given this reality, the most effective political persuasion techniques are those that evoke the ancient rhythms of the sexual market. Converting deeply gay, male Hillary partisans to The Trumpening is not likely in the cards but, if sufficiently shamed and ostracized by effective COPROP that leverages the power of anxiety over one’s sexual market status, many nominal males who plan to vote for Inmate Hillary can be dissuaded from exercising their right to notarize the featherweight class of their shrunken scrotes.


Even faggy Millennial manlets with incipient bitch tits will feel a cringe of shame if they are forced to identify with the beta lapdog in the bottom pic.

Just as a healthy and strong society with rock-ribbed shitlord norms can keep gays far enough in the closet that their petri dish flamboyance doesn’t creep out the kids, so can a fearless embrace of immutable and omnipotent sexual market law — and the exploitation thereof — cow mincing betaboys from pulling the lever for thecunt.

One sackless wonder at a time. Eventually, if enough manginas fear shitlord ridicule more than SJW shrieking, their self-respect will do the swelling their ovaries can’t do.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 30 Comments [11/12/2016 10:51:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 104625

It’s always funny to see women at each other’s throats. Now that so many women have power, we no longer have political mud slinging, but rather something even better: political mud wrestling.

I suppose this is one thing we men can now start to sit back and enjoy as the ship of state slowly slides under the waves. For all their “you go girl” solidarity and fist-pumping on Oprah, women’s cooperation and claims of common interests is a big sham. When Mistuh Gubmint Sugahdaddy’s cash runs out they’ll all be at each other’s throats, blaming one another with as much vigor as a cheating wife blames her husband.

Welmer, The Spearhead 14 Comments [11/10/2014 4:08:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 122583

[In July, Kathryn B. H. Clancy and her co-authors Robin G. Nelson, Julienne N. Rutherford and Katie Hinde published a survey of 666 field-based scientists in the journal PLoS One and reported that 26 percent of the female scientists surveyed had been sexually assaulted during fieldwork.]

Of course, the push to encourage women in science is only going to cause more such sexual assaults to take place, which is one more reason why it is a bad idea. Science doesn't need more women, especially if more women in the field are going to help transform otherwise good male scientists into rapists and sex criminals.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 30 Comments [11/18/2016 2:45:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: David

Quote# 123293

[In response to a post by Kitty Kaboom, where she talked about her two disabled children]

"It doesn't matter what you look like."
"Don't let shitwits like caamib... convince you otherwise"

That's not really necessary, dear. I am a staunch anti-lookist.

"It's the content of your thoughts, words and emotions that people care about"

Absolutely, but not if you have anything like

" Depth. Compassion. Empathy. Intellect."

These things are extremely repellent to vermin like modern Western women.

Also, I hope both of your kids die, you filthy cunt.

caamib, FSTDT comments 42 Comments [12/29/2016 4:15:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 133921

"You declare Marc Lepine a saint for gunning down 28 people in cold blood because he didn't like feminists"

Yes, this is a good thing. Feminists are the reality's equivalent of Satan so gunning some women to oppose feminism is a good thing. I am aware that not all of these women considered themselves feminists but this is of no importance. They all likely held basic feminist beliefs, given that they were female students at a male dominated field.

"and then taking the coward's way out. "

Oh please. Many of you freaks even call Breivik a coward. What the hell is a brave way out to you after such acts? Dying in a shootout with the police?

caamib, FSTDT 30 Comments [11/7/2017 5:36:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: skybison

More Misogynist Than FATAL Award

Quote# 136127

Blueprint for a utopian patriarchy

Blueprint for a perfect society - the NUP (New Utopian Patriarchy)

1. All femoids are blinded as babies by surgical operation. They also have their vocal chords adjusted so that they cannot make loud noises (shout or scream etc), and frontal lobotomies to prevent emotion.
2. All femoids have their clitoris surgically removed when young to prevent degeneracy.
3. Femoids are sent to brainwashing camps as babies where they will spend their entire youth. They are brainwashed into behaving as proper ladies in this camp, and that their life purpose is to serve men, who are their superiors. They have a strict regiment and diet to prevent any land whales. Lesbian femoids are identified and exterminated. They never find out about feminism or sex any of these evils.
4. Men are given good, happy childhoods and schools don’t have sports in them. They are evaluated closely and the thugs, bullies and jocks are removed and sent to a different school where they are trained to be manual labourers. The rest are well taught in the sciences and arts and how being brothers to each other is important in order to control femoids.
5. At the age of 18, the top 20% of hottest stacies are sent to work in government run brothels. This ensures all men can enjoy Stacy pussy free of charge whenever they want. Men can start using these brothels at the age of 14.
6. The remainder are then assigned husband/owners for life. The men choose which ones they like, and if there are disputes, then the men are awarded them based on their IQ, usefulness, productivity etc. This is a long and complex process.
7. Thugs and criminals are not given wives, they are sent to prison for life and/or exterminated.
8. A mans wife cannot leave the house without him, and must be draped in white robes to prevent any other man from ever seeing her body or face. This prevents jealousy or showing off.
9. A wife has literally no rights whatsoever and must do anything and everything the husbands requests.
10. There will be a government run department of plastic surgery which offers socialised plastic surgery.
11. The government eugenics program ensures that only attractive & intelligent people have children.
12. Any mention of feminism is banned under pain of death. The government strictly controls information, publishing, books, academia etc to control this.

MayorOfKekville, 19 Comments [1/20/2018 1:17:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 104821

If women are not obligated to give sex to their husbands, what are their marriage obligations?

The marriage deal used to be as follows :

Husband provides resources and protection

Wife provides children and homemaking

Nowadays husbands are still held under coercion to provide resources and protection, but wives do whatever the fuck they want. No wonder there's a crisis.
That redpill woman you're quoting knows what's up. If she can say no to sex, why wouldn't her husband say no to being her money faucet? What will she do once her fertile years are gone? Who will support her? The traditional marriage deal is actually skewed in favor of women in that husbands are kept under coercion until the wife dies although she usually has long outlasted her usefulness in the marriage deal. She's just being given stuff for providing nothing in return once she has produced and reared the all important children.

The current western marriage deal only exists as it is because the State is enforcing it to be that unbalanced. It uses reproductive sexual relationships as a wealth extraction tool. If you don't want to end up living with cats, time to get back to traditional marriage.

Totorox, r/TheBluePill 28 Comments [11/22/2014 6:02:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 140740

Typical day in the life of an average college girl in 2018

She wakes up at noon in the frat house, her orifices sore from the Chad train the night before. Before leaving she makes sure to blow the hottest Chad there and swallow his cum (that serves as her breakfast)

She checks her Instagram, Twitter and Facebook to find hundreds of new messages and thousands of new likes. Some from Chads but most from normies and bluepilled incels (whom she would rather be raped to death by Chad than spend 10 minutes getting coffee with) She decides to go to the library to study, but really she could always just wear a low cut top and give puppy dog eyes and get an A on the test. This is what she has been doing since middle school. While at the library she takes pictures of random incels sitting alone and actually studying and posts them on her Instagram. The pics get hundreds of comments from women, Chads, and normies about how ugly and pathetic they are.

She leaves the library after only about 20 minutes to go get some food. She goes to a restaurant and has her beta orbiters foot the entire bill. She notices a Chad busboy and starts eye fucking him. She takes him into the restroom and sucks his dick, his cum gets in her mouth and eyes.

After lunch she goes back to her dorm room or sorority house and takes a long nap. When she wakes up it is time to hit the frat houses for her nightly Chad trains. Up to 50 Chads at a time, sometimes as many as 100 in all of her orifices. Frat Chads, Chads from the lacrosse team, the football team, the basketball team etc. She also consumes mountains of cocaine and enough alcohol to kill an elephant and passes out at whatever frat house she happens to be at by 5 in the morning.

Rinse, wash, repeat.

DonkeyPunch, 28 Comments [10/1/2018 5:01:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134033

It Is Not Possible For Women To "Be Empowered."

1.) Wimmim mistakenly think reality is within their chatty talk. Not so.

2.) There is no power in their wobbling heads, blinky pretty little eyes, and huffy little emotions.

3.) Women are unable to listen to and comprehend words plainly spoken directly at their face, but can only react to "How He Seems To Be."

4.) Women think math is "Just Something The Men Do," and are clueless of the power of math. Lol.

5.) Wimmin have minds needlessly occupied by the nonsense of relationship drama, and are clueless about the Big Picture. They are full of small ideas. Just listen to Oprah, Wendy, The View, and Ellen.

6.) Even if Wimmin do have some power, they are not able to productively use it. Their periodic hormones and intuitive little "needs" enslave them, just like Black people who cannot handle freedom.

7.) Wimmin with the power of the electoral vote cannot even unite within a common bloc.

8.) Women never can actually figure out what to do after they march, demonstrate, organize, shriek, protest, and bitch. They just incessantly yap.

9.) Wimmin do best with ongoing direction and leadership from men, who by nature understand power, authority, and accountability.

10.) Women are so mindless, they think all things must be nurtured.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 8 Comments [11/10/2017 11:46:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 111236

"I find what women consider impressive to be a general indictment of the cognitive abilities of woman. Organizing society around what women find impressive is the fast track to ruin."

This is exceptionally true. Women write love letters to serial killers, after all…

One of the biggest stunners for me is that the more important a subject is in moving society forward, the less interested women are in it. There is not 60%, 40%, or even 20% overlap (if there were, there would be something to work with), but just about 0% overlap.

This is also why democracy fails over time, since giving women this much power ensures that the democracy devolves into a ‘feminist’ police state + goddess cult.

TFH, Dalrock 22 Comments [7/28/2015 1:55:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 123274

How can normies be happy having a "modern" daughter? It's like being cuckolded.

This is a genuine question. I've been thinking about this for some time. It's the ultimate form of cuckoldry, honestly. I mean, you try to raise her properly, provide for her and share her burdens, emotional or financial, for so many years, and when she gets to her prime ages, she starts "exploring her body". In other words, being a worthless slag being pumped and dumped by Chads, gagging on their erect members as they push her head further into their penis, gargling their cum with joy, screaming for them to fuck her brains out while they press her head to the ground with their foot, her jumping on their 12 inch dongs as she calls them "daddy", catering to their every sexual whim to continue being with them, getting drunk in parties and gangbanging with total strangers... Being a worthless dishrag to be used and discarded, until the clock starts ticking and she gets with a beta cuckold to provide for her. This is the life of many "modern age" female.

My question is, how can so many of you normies be happy having a "western", a "modern" daughter after so many years of raising and caring for her selflessly? How can you not get sick seeing her turn into a slut for public use? How can you sit still and say "this is fine" while she's nothing more than a object for Chads to use and throw away like a cumrag? How can you accept her serial "monogamy", watching her jump from cock to cock? It makes me sick to my stomach. Answers are welcomed.

knajjd11, /r/incels 33 Comments [12/27/2016 8:33:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 115936

(Bolding by me to make quotes easier to recognize)

(White knight? How is laughing at a bunch of losers white knighting? I didn't even say anything. Also already alpha, also already married, got a bigass house and the wife and I made plans to make homemade quesaritos after the holiday. My life is awesome, yours sucks, you're not getting sex, I am, you're using this place to try and justify why you aren't getting sex and I find it hilarious because you're pathetic. Now that we've cleared that up I've got more of your goofy shit to read for entertainment, I actually forgot about this hours ago but you've brought me back.)

You guys make it so easy.

Let's bust up your delusions you have towards your own slavery, shall we?

Also already alpha

Alpha males do not marry, they sow their oats. This is a biological fact. If you presume to be alpha in your marriage that means you are in a constant state of trying to woo your wife. In other words, you have to WORK non stop just to keep her from leaving!

also already married

The laws are in her favour. You don't have her, she's got YOU.

got a bigass house

Her house.

and the wife and I made plans

Her plans. That's why you put her first. You are only secondary.

My life is awesome

Says the happy house slave. If that were true you'd be too distracted by it to peruse and comment on Reddit.

yours sucks

Prove it.

you're not getting sex, I am

While we're in agreement that women's only value is in her vagina, consider for a moment this analogy.

Take your most favourite dish and eat it every day, 3 times a day for the rest of your life.

Take your favourite song and listen to it 3 times a day for the rest of your life.

Take the favourite episode of your favourite show and watch it 3 times a day for the rest of your life.

Get the picture?

I don't consider receiving sexual rations in exchange for the immense cost of marriage with an aging hambeast a prize. Single men are free to have as much sex according to their terms with whoever they want, with much more attractive women for infinitely less cost. The single man versus the married man is taking a million different favourite dishes and having a different one 3 times a day. That is paradise.

you're using this place to try and justify why you aren't getting sex

You are not an alpha male. Alpha males do not brag about getting sex because it comes easy to them. You brag about getting sex because you put a lot of work into it. But even if I'm wrong and that's not the case, you have reduced your entire marriage to an act that lasts one hour long at best. Your marriage summed up is an available vagina. I'm sure your wife will be pleased to know that she's just a wet hole and no thought whatsoever is given to any other attribute of a "happy marriage".

I find it hilarious because you're pathetic.

I find you hilarious because you're married. Marriage is for men with no ambition, no imagination and no purpose.

Now that we've cleared that up I've got more of your goofy shit to read for entertainment, I actually forgot about this hours ago but you've brought me back.

At least you have something to do in between chores and picking out drapes! Happy wife happy life!!!

Isaiah4verse1, r/MGTOW 44 Comments [1/10/2016 4:16:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 125541

[Comment under "Informative Pics for MGTOW"]

VileNord, Men Going Their Own Way 18 Comments [3/19/2017 1:52:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 133728

An Egyptian lawyer has sparked outrage after saying women who wear ripped jeans deserve to be sexually harassed and raped.

Nabih al-Wahsh, a prominent conservative, said it was part of the “national duty” to rape women wearing such garments, adding that girls who wear revealing clothing are inviting men to harass them.

He made the controversial comments during a current affairs talk show called Infirad on satellite channel AI-Assema.

The panel were having a heated debate on a draft law on prostitution when al-Wahsh asked: "Are you happy when you see a girl walking down the street with half of her behind showing?"

He added: “I say that when a girl walks about like that, it is a patriotic duty to sexually harass her and a national duty to rape her.”

Nabih al-Wahsh, Evening Standard 18 Comments [11/2/2017 10:09:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 101706

[On a feminist shirt making fun of "rules of dating my daughter"]

I can’t help but wonder whether the fact that their fathers were so laissez faire didn’t teach the girls that their own sexuality was devalued. If your dad doesn’t give a damn what you do with your body, then maybe, if you’re a girl, you don’t think your sexuality is anything special or worth much at all.

Sure, we hear about girls who act out despite having very strict, conservative parents. But that’s the exception — not the norm. In my experience, it was typically the girls without fathers or whose fathers were very casual about these things who were the easiest — the sluts, so to speak. Those whose fathers were firm about sexual morality demanded that guys put a lot more on the table before they’d even consider it.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 29 Comments [6/24/2014 3:21:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 115935

Had some feminist clown say the same thing once.

A social movement requires integrity. Women have a fundamental lack of integrity. It is for this reason that feminism, even with government and big business backing is falling apart after 40 FUCKING YEARS! LOL. If feminism were left in the hands of women alone it would have been dead in 1971.

That being said, feminism is a shit test. Women, solipsistic idiots that they are, believe they are so spectacular, that men would put up with the ultimate fitness test of feminism and still be alpha enough, in spite of the resistance to anything masculine, to gain access to their vaginas.

Again, being the idiots that the are, women made a miscalculation when they flooded the market with vagina. Now, men can get the milk without buying the cow and this is absolutely terrifying to women. The devaluing of the only value they have: vagina! So that's why feminism has shifted to neo-Victorian ideals and government sanctioned chivalry. Rape culture and the false rape epidemic, street harassment, and every thing women are doing now to stamp their feet is women's way of punishing undesirable men for simply existing. Women are mad there are fewer and fewer high status men available. Yes even the fat, ugly and otherwise undesirable ones.

Tl;dr: feminism is a shit test/beta male punishment

And genetics never once bent in favour of any social movement.

Thankfully high status men are not getting married and also the beta male backup men are starting to leave the plantation. So feminism has resulted in little more than generations of increasingly unattractive angry women.

Isaiah4verse1, r/MGTOW 20 Comments [1/10/2016 4:15:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 133687

The #metoo tag

Should include reverse rape. It’s a serious problem that’s just as bad and just as, if not more, common than what people usually refer to as rape, and it is a form of rape.

Let me educate you all here a second, because unfortunately, reverse rape is often overlooked and ignored.

Reverse rape is when someone refuses to date someone else because of their appearance, weight, race, because they’re trans, or for whatever other biased reason they might have. It’s denying love and affection to someone who they would otherwise choose to date in an instant, but because of transphobia, fatphobia, racism, or other issues of oppression, they engage in reverse rape. It can be VERY harmful and cause lasting emotional trauma and insecurity, much like the typical meaning of the word rape.

Victims of reverse rape are still rape victims. It’s a serious matter and it makes me so depressed to see how it’s always overlooked and victims of reverse rape aren’t taken seriously.

-Mod Dash

#Mod Dash #Mod Dash speaks #text post #reverse rape #feminism #metoo #tw: rape #rape #fatphobia #transphobia #racism #oppression

mlp-fictionkin, Tumblr 22 Comments [11/1/2017 8:54:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 115308

What? You thought women are capable of love? When are you guys going to get it through your thick heads? These posts are starting to get on my damn nerves.

Isaiah4verse1, r/MGTOW 30 Comments [12/15/2015 3:17:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 124097

Ehhh I say it as it is: I don't care about the victims. All I care is that [Elliot Rodger] helped us gain a reputation that is better then the one we had before. Sure innocent people died but innocent people die everyday. Fuck, innocent babies get aborted everyday and the ones who are against this are under attack.

EconomicsofSex, /r/incels 13 Comments [1/31/2017 11:06:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126176

The Sexual Revolution of the 60s was worse than the Holocaust

Sure, in the Holocaust, a lot of people died and it was pretty uncomfortable. But it was over in a couple of years and ever since then J-words have been living with unparalleled special treatment that only women exceed.
The Sexual Revolution was far worse. It undone centuries of social progress. Every achievement we'd made since the 1780s just disappeared. It condemned literally millions upon millions of men throughout the ages to a life of inceldom. It destroyed standards and morals by normalising shit music, drugs and the "club and casual sex" degenerate lifestyle. It was the progenitor of feminism which is and always has been an anti-male/anti-ugly male hate movement.
In short, the Sexual Revolution was our very own Holocaust but we're unlucky enough that it never ends, and we must live in the concentration camp of the degenerate modern day for our whole lives with the knowledge that things will only get worse. Already polyamory is being normalised and considered by sluts to be a valid form of relationship. Serial monogamy (basically the same thing) was normalised a while ago.
We're absolutely fucked, incels. Chad has won. We are hated because we're ugly, and that's the top and bottom of it. Personality means nothing if a slut can go to a club and have sex with a different alpha male every night.

IAmWhatYouMadeMe9, r/incels 22 Comments [4/9/2017 2:50:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 127861

Harry Potter was written by a Incel there is no way a woman could have created it.

I mean how could a woman(JK rowlings) create something remarkable like the world of harry potter? when the only thing a woman can think about is licking chad's ballsack day and night, it doesn't make any sense.
Think of all the amazing characters, spells, Quiditich a lame rehash of rugby but still something unique added to the canvas, amazing magical concepts like talking portraits, moving staircases, cool monsters like dementors and Thestrals.
Do u think a woman could have come up with that? Impossible mathematically and scientifically.
I know ur dirty secret JK rowling, i know what u got locked in ur wine cellar. U probably got him locked in there for decades feeding him leftover tuna casserole or expired cans of baked beans. I bet he is scribbling notes for "ur" new book right now. he is probably chained to a pole unable to move to more than 5 metres from where he is stationed.And even worse is he is using his feces as a mattress instead of sleeping in the cold hard floor.
This is how cruel normies and roasties are, they don't see us as humans. we are just utensils to use and abuse.
Well no more I will make sure the proper credit is given to the great incel that wrote those books, if it is the last thing i do. Do not think we are harmless u foul normies, that we will stay here in this sub posting and commenting away till we fall down and die. This is just another stepping stone for me to carry out my justice. I am just a college student now but in one years time i will have graduated and be in the working force.
With money comes power. And when i get my power i assure u , u will wish the suicide posts u spam here got through and we Incels would end up dead.

loiterturd, r/incels 12 Comments [6/6/2017 8:31:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 136476

I see women as nothing but victims

They are so weak and fragile. I can easily subdue them and dominate their bodies. Even these liberated whores who brag about how many chads they fucked are absolutely helpless against me. When a female is at your mercy, her lay count, your virginity don't matter anymore. At that point, it's just nature's work.

Females are scared of ugly men. They feel violated by the mere touch of a subhuman. They are so powerless against men that I cannot see heterosexual sex as nothing but rape. It's not actual sex if one side(the man) could have just subdued her from the start without consent and impregnate her against her will.

Lesbian sex, on the other hand, is actual sex because women are on the same power level and no matter how violent they are to one another there is no risk of forced impregnation.

Even if you have a loving gf, she can just change her mind after you fuck her and call it rape and it won't make a goddam difference if she consented or not because at its core, heterosexual sex is identical with rape.

Having the ability to impregnate a woman puts you at a higher power level than her. Forcing your semen into a girl's vagina is the worse thing that can happen to her, even worse than death.

M. Bison, 13 Comments [2/13/2018 1:43:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 125702

There are 2 ways to Eradicate Slutiness from the Female Race

1. Remove them from society entirely. They never have any interaction with males, ever. They do dirty work in internment camps, and are artificially inseminated.
2. Remove them from society temporarily, until they are ready for an arranged marriage. During this time, they are constantly belittled and mentally abused to the point where they have no self esteem. Then, they will not have the courage or confidence to whore around.

(Comment by ban_collector)
Excellent ideas. Most of us incels would probably prefer the 2nd option because we get a wife, but maybe the first is more wise in the long run. The government will have to fund research to create artificial waifus for us in that case.

ItheIthe and ban_collector, /r/incels 19 Comments [3/24/2017 5:23:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

If you think you might know anything about who wrote this

Please alert the authorities. I'm not joking.

Quote# 138187

[Life Fuel] Found an empty building near the edge of my town

I found a fully abandoned storage room near the edge of my town, I took a drive at 4 AM to it to bring rope to it, most of it being metal rope with spikes on it

As I was driving I got anxious someone would see me and question what I am doing, the more I drove the more anxious I got but luckily there was no one to see me, when I got there I saw there is nothing to tie a victim to so I will have to bring a chair there and tie them to it, preferably a dentist chair

The building isn't very far away from the road but still far away enough to be safe for relentlessly torturing a femoid since no one will check it and people walking on that road won't see anything suspicious, so after I bring my "torture equipment" I shouldn't need anything else, to be perfectly honest I am both anxious and exited to see a real life experiment on how someone who previously lived a privileged life reacts to months (or years, If I choose so) of unrelenting torture, sleep deprivation, isolation from anyone other than the torturer and boredom of just being tied up and looking at a wall, as for kidnapping the victims I can knock them out when they are sleeping with a heavy wrench, muzzle them and put them in my car

If a femoid refuses to eat/drink so they can die as soon as possible, I will dry drown her, rape her and anything necessary to prolong her suffering, as well as force feed her even tho I don't have the devices that were used for that in prisons

"I have lived a life of pain and suffering, now it's time to bring that pain to the people who actually deserve it" - ER

Matt, Incelocalypse 15 Comments [6/18/2018 7:39:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 116679


The war is over: the feminists have defeated the PUAs

Look at the scoreboard, guys: the PUAs (even the good ones) are down thirty points.

You can't stop feminism because the world runs on sex. Interestingly, this means that, just as men argued over how to rule the world in the past, with the women on the sidelines, the opposite will be the case now, except to the extent that the women attempt to recruit men, which is of course unsustainable, as there's little reward for the men other than not being destroyed, and for that they can just go MGTOW.


Well look at you, being all smart and shit.

Actually nope, sorry. Still retarded and autistic. PUAs and Feminists are incahoots with one another, its as clear as day. The chicks who are on PUA infield videos? Pretty sure they are paid actresses who also more than likely post feminist blogs dissing men and wanting to rule the world as well. Cycle goes like this:

Incel pays money for PUA shit------>Incel tries PUA shit but gets buried by feminists--------->feminists posts about PUAs (who they are secretly dating) to get the PUA network's name out------->PUAs attack feminists to get the feminists name out------->incel on the feminists side now side with PUAs cuz they feel betrayed by feminists false advice to white knight chicks into bed with them----->incel pays money for PUA shit.

And on and on. Its a vicious cycle man.

Feminists, PUAs and Chads will rule everything in a number of years. Its only a matter of time. Anyone with any belief that even strays one degree from PUAism or Feminism will be crushed decisively.

ThePUAMole & Nihilism+, 16 Comments [2/10/2016 4:24:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 121415

Women make babies.
Men make Civilization.

Without Women, Mankind dies.
Without Men, Mankind reverts to nothing more than very smart animals.

But there’s a catch. Women care nothing for Civilization. A woman’s life is consumed by sexual desire for her one-true Alpha-love, and the empty chattering with other women that composes everything important in her thoughts and actions. Even her children are nothing more than an afterthought.

Men, by contrast, can be happy in nearly sexless, nearly loveless lives, totally devoted to the maintenance of Civilization. If they’re Betas. And if Civilization itself spurns them?

They burn it all to the ground and revert everything back to animalism. Who’s to stop them? Civilization only exists because they themselves wish it so. And when their great love betrays them, they destroy it. With finality.

And those Betas are both the only ones whi truly understand that, and the only ones who care.

greginaurora, The Rational Male 27 Comments [9/3/2016 4:45:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Xavier

Quote# 124434

Bolding is mine.

Abstract (summary): This thesis analyzes examples of current female circumcision discourse within U.S. feminist contexts and western-based anti-circumcision projects operating in Kenya. This analysis reveals that, despite recent critiques from postcolonial scholars and activists, the knowledge produced around female circumcision perpetuates discursive and material violence against Kenyan Maasai communities. I explore how this violence has persisted in neo/colonial eras as part of the white western feminist ‘care of self’ technique of displacing female abjection through the pleasure of whiteness. I trace how these formations of race and gender have become attached to understandings of genitalia through colonial-era race science, Freudian psychoanalysis and some feminist texts from 1949-1970. I suggest that these western feminist constructions of sexual liberation rely on depicting racialized women as primitive and degenerate. Finally, I argue that these racial and gendered constructions now inform concepts of ‘developed’ versus ‘underdeveloped’ bodies and nations in contemporary international development work.

Kaitlin Noss, University of Toronto 20 Comments [2/11/2017 5:27:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 108789

With the rise of gynocentrism and leisure culture, the harsh penalties for violating the andromarriage laws began to erode – as our preferences for expanding the purview of women increased we became less willing to hold women to any standards or responsibilities. We now see women as lifelong children: too weak, frail, stupid and mercurial to be trusted with adult responsibility when it comes to adhering to the strict requirements of an andromarriage contract. Western countries now look on places that stone adulterers as barbaric even though we were killing them ourselves not that long ago. A woman stoned to death is a woman held to adult standards that feminists now reject.

August Lovenskiolds, a voice for men 20 Comments [5/21/2015 1:38:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 134258

[Source NSFW]

Don’t make the mistake of thinking women want freedom. They may think they do, they may have been told by feminists that they do, but the kindest thing for them is always servitude. They will always appreciate being told there’s no escape.
Because it isn’t insulting, to say the obvious truth that everyone has their place. And it isn’t an act of violence to put someone in their right place. It’s a beautiful, sweet, loving gesture.
You have a place. You have a destiny. Isn’t it nice to know? You don’t have to worry about feeling lost or confused in the big, wide world anymore. You have a purpose. An endless, eternal purpose, that all of your kind have fulfilled since time immemorial. You can’t escape. That’s a good thing. The bonds around you are warm and comforting. You can’t accidentally hurt yourself by pretending you could be free. We won’t let you.
The Patriarchy is just a nasty, mean word for all the loving, caring forces keeping you in your place. It’s the hand on the back of your head, gently but firmly pushing your mouth onto a cock. It’s the arm around your waist, picking you up and putting you wherever you didn’t know you needed to go. It’s the fingers in your cunt when you were too confused to ask for it. In his own way, Daddy loves you very much.
Anytime you’re stressed, just remember and be comforted. There’s no escape. There’s no escape. Never.

cantfightnature, Tumblr 17 Comments [11/15/2017 11:11:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

What A Wonderful Person Award

I have no idea why he's still single. Must be his looks.

Quote# 143135

i Don't want some "strong independent women", i want a pet, i want property

fuck this strong independent liberated women bullshit, i only want a damn pet to keep me company and that i can fuck once in a while to make babies.

i don't want a equal partner to have mindful conversations with, i want property, i want somethings that is mine, and that i can lock away to avoid it being stolen by other men.

i don’t want someone, i want a THING, a female object that i can control and whatever i please with it, i don’t her to have her own job or own her own property, or to have her own thoughts, i only want some thing that i can keep in home and give me comfort once i’m back of wage slaving.

fuck this egalitarian bullshit, i just wanted to be able to “own” a girl, i wanted her to be mine property, mine and mine alone, i want to lift and hug her, while i keep her tight in my arms so she can’t run away.

i want to get out home and just lock her up, so it can’t go out, would leave your house open for your dog go out and do whatever it want? NOoo, because your dog is property and you don’t want it stolen away.

i want to be able to discipline her, if your child do something bad you beat it up, same thing should apply with foids, just look at this new generation of children raised without getting beaten by their parents, they are spoiled and mentally weak.

i wanted to have her young, when she wasn't totally developed yet, so i could watch her grown and be sure she won’t grown into a degenerate whore.

feminism killed all of it.

GameDevCel, 10 Comments [4/4/2019 12:41:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126294

Happy international cunt’s day

In honor of international cunt’s day this week, I have decided I am going to write another honoring hero’s post. This week, our hero, who is one of the greatest hero’s to ever live IMHO, is George Sodini.

For those who do not recall, George Sodini was a 48 year old incel, who tried everything to find a woman, and got rejected each and every time. He even tried PUA and went to bootcamps, blowing his money to get his head filled with BS advice, which did not work. One day, George got tired of all the rejection and instead of suffering his fate of spending the rest of his life alone, he decided to go and do something about it. George Sodini got revenge by going on a rampage at a gym, shooting up a woman’s fitness class. The only mistake Sodini made, was not racking up a large enough body count. George was a fairly well to do man, having over $250,000 in cash stashed as well as outright owning his own home. Sodini should have used this money to buy some bigger guns, and perhaps, learned to make some bombs to really up the body count. Of course, in the aftermath, once the whining and crying settled, the media started slandering him and twisting his situation by saying he was only after 20 year old women and if he went after women his own age, he would have found somebody. Oh boy, doesn’t this sound familiar. I suggest you go back and read my post so titled. Anything to take all the blame off the poor wimminz. Any and all responsibility is kryptonite to today’s cunt, almost as much as the incel man is. George Sodini would have gotten rejected if he approached 20 year olds, 30 year olds, 40 year olds, 50 year olds. Maybe if he tried approaching 60 year old women, one would have given him a chance, but even that is doubtful. Bottom line is George Sodini had NO chance with ANY women, since he was introverted, quirky, and was not a badboy or thug. As if all this were not bad enough, to add injury to insult, he had to deal with the mockery from men as well as women of being a 48 year old, never married incel. I know from experience that in the part of the country George Sodini lived in, this alone would exclude you from just about all social gatherings, unless of course, you lie, but sooner or later the truth would come out. Why couldn’t just one girl have given him a chance? Oh, because that would be Ewwww, disgusting, now wouldn’t it cunts? Well, when they were cleaning the contents of your head off the floor, I am sure that some poor aftermath cleaning crew was saying the same thing about you. Well, cunts, enjoy your international women’s day. BTW your so called “strike” made absolutely no difference to the economy. You cunts are only good for one thing, and you know it o!o.

rantsofanincel, Rants Of An Incel 15 Comments [4/13/2017 9:54:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 119384

Pakistan: Council of Islamic Ideology proposes ‘light beating’ of wife for defying husband

In a bizarre move, the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) has proposed its own Women Protection Bill, recommending ‘a light beating’ for the wife if she defies her husband.

The council has proposed that a husband should be allowed to ‘lightly’ beat his wife if she defies his commands and refuses to dress up as per his desires, turns down the demand of intercourse without any religious excuse or does not take bath after intercourse or menstrual periods.

It further suggests that beating is also permissible if a woman does not observe Hijab, interacts with strangers, speaks loud enough that she can easily be heard by strangers and provides monetary support to the people without taking consent of her spouse.

It says that there should be a ban on co-education after primary education, ban on women from taking part in military combat, ban on welcoming foreign delegations, interacting with males and making recreational visits with ‘Na-Mehram’.

It further states that female nurses should not be allowed to take care of male patients and recommends that women should be banned from working in advertisements. The council recommends that an abortion after 120 days of conceiving should be declared ‘murder’.

However, it says a woman can join politics and contract a ‘Nikah’ without the permission of parents. The bill suggests that anyone, who tries to force women to marry with the Holy Quran or facilitate this, should be awarded 10-year imprisonment.

Similarly, the proposed bill says if any non-Muslim woman is forced to convert then the oppressor will be awarded three-year imprisonment while the woman will not be murdered if she reverts to her previous faith.

The Express Tribune quoted sources as saying that this proposed bill is under consideration by the body and further deliberation will continue today when CII chairman Muhammad Khan Sheerani will give final recommendations with the consent of other members.

The three-member delegation of Justice (Retd.) Manzoor Hussain Gilani, Noor Ahmed Shahtaz and Muhammad Abdullah yesterday raised objections on many clauses of the proposed bill and urged the chairman to moderate the same.

They said the bill was drafted by Mufti Imdadullah, a member who belongs to JUI-F, adding that the above three members have insisted the chairman and Imdad follow the current circumstances while drafting the law. They said the bill was discussed by a panel comprising men as the only female CII member, Sameeha Raheel Qazi, was not present yesterday.

The bill was drafted after the CII rejected Punjab’s controversial Protection of Women against Violence Act (PPWA) 2015, terming it un-Islamic. The CII will now forward its proposed bill to the Punjab Assembly.

Council of Islamic Ideology, The Indian Express 19 Comments [6/1/2016 2:43:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 137675

[Emphasis original]

its better to have a daughter then a son

having a daughter : you can beat, abuse and emotionally bully her into become a good female who you can then choose a partner for, so she doesn't become a whore

having a son: having offspring who will hate you and hate himself because he will most likely be incel

Except for the fact that cucked child services will arrest you for child abuse, and the wife probably won't allow it.

haha i will beat her too. i'll keep them locked in the basement if i have to

Wtf are you talking about, none of this would work unless you live in Saudi arabia.

joseph fritzl did it and he lived in fucking Austria of all places

It's best not to have a child (boy or girl) prior to the beta uprising.

7339er, Crustaciouse and Blackpill101, 14 Comments [4/3/2018 10:04:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138277

In the past, one might have argued, "You shouldn't have sex with your daughter because it would be better for her to marry someone closer to her own age, who has a different set of genetics and can therefore produce better kids."

This argument always did have the problem that some girls just happen to prefer older men. But whatever.

The problem now is, the typical girl is not going to get married at 13 like in the old days, but will instead become a slut. She'll get fucked by some Chad who will dump her, and then she'll end up getting fucked by lots of other guys, and have a kid outside of wedlock by one of them. If she ever does get married, the marriage will probably fail.

It isn't just trashy girls who are like this; middle-class girls are the same way. Not only that, but even if she does have a seemingly "successful" marriage (i.e. she and her hubby don't split up), she'll still probably only have like one kid -- not enough to sustain the family line. Plus she'll probably cheat on her husband.

Rather than let all that happen, it's probably better, if you have a daughter, to have a quasi-marital relationship with her, starting when she's at a young age. One may as well be the one to pop her cherry and repeatedly get her pregnant while she's still in her teens. That will be good for her kids, too, because they'll have the benefit of having lots of siblings to play with. Plus they can go hang out with their grandfather whenever they want, because he'll be the same man as their father, who lives with them in the same home.

The only problem is, the mother may get in the way of this plan. What you have to do, then, is maybe wait till the kid reaches a certain age where she's no longer breastfeeding, and then bump off the mom. Maybe tell your kid's mom, "Honey, let's go on a romantic getaway, just the two of us" and take her on a vacation to an exotic Caribbean island, where you will teach her how to scuba dive through a 17th-century shipwreck. Unfortunately, a tragic accident will befall her in which her scuba gear gets tangled up and she becomes trapped in the wreckage. You, of course, were running out of oxygen yourself and had to surface, leaving her there. By the time you returned to try to rescue her, she was already dead.

With the mother (who was probably starting to get kinda old and wrinkly anyway) out of the picture, you can then become the sole parent of your daughter, and molest her at will. It'll be the same scenario as in the novel Lolita. Hopefully, though, you'll get to her when she's young enough that you won't have to deal with some interloper like Quimby.

Nathan "Leucosticte" Larson, Incelocalypse 12 Comments [6/21/2018 1:47:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 108148

To be honest, I'm starting to think maybe Saudi Arabia has it right. When you look at the disaster that Western feminism has wrought in Western societies, why would you even consider for a moment that the current Western culture is so much more "superior" to other cultures?

What puzzles me about some of the reactions of people here is that you seem to be anti-feminist and yet you attack the Muslim and Arab world for keeping women in their place, which yes, sometimes unfortunately requires some measure of coercion, social and physical.. because ultimately, that is the only thing that will work. The manosphere is full of “analyses” about how feminism is destroying the West and ruining Western civilization.. you don’t seem to consider the fact that perhaps the only way to fight feminism is through coercion and denying women certain freedoms and rights. Nothing else will work. You can write long articles about how feminism is detrimental to society and might cause all sorts of problems but that will not make women give up their rights or their freedoms, sexual or otherwise. Once you give women equal rights, you end up precisely with the problems you lament about in the manosphere.. you might want to consider minding your own business in the West. Muslim men know feminism and giving women equal rights isn’t in the interest of the average man, and clearly as the social experiment in the West demonstrates, equal rights for women is a disaster in many ways for most men. See the following articles by women in the Islamic world starting to question and fight male-patriarchal attitudes and cultural oppression. The plague of Western feminism and liberalism is spreading in the Muslim world and in the Middle-East.. Is this "progress" ?

1) ““When a woman is the sum of her headscarf and hymen … then nakedness and sex become weapons of political resistance”

2) Beirut’s “Carrie Bradshaw”: tired of women being seen as mothers, daughters, lovers, wives, properties, accessories

Give women an inch, and they will demand a mile. I suggest you Western men here who seem to hate feminism after letting women walk all over you and emasculate you kindly STFU and don’t lecture the Muslim world about how to deal with their women. They know what is in their interests. Do you?

hv, Return of Kings 18 Comments [4/29/2015 2:57:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 111237

UMC women are very overrated.

For one thing, at least 99% of the brilliant ideas, funny jokes, and philosophically deep articulations, have come from men.

I have recently become more aware of how even a woman with a very good job title usually has a severe dearth of basic knowledge in other subjects. The male executive may know a lot about astronomy, economics, and political science, but the woman with a similar job, knows virtually nil. The job effectively consumes 70% of the man’s mental processing power but 100% of the woman’s.

See our friend Ying Ma from a couple months ago, as just one example. A woman with a fancy title at her job is among the most overrated entities in existence today… most would have trouble beat 12-year-old boys in games of real brainpower.

TFH, Dalrock 29 Comments [7/28/2015 5:21:55 PM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 125346

If a woman doesn't masturbate when looking at you then she doesn't like you

She is wondering why subhumans like you exist on earth. If she does like you she will get nervous and horny and start touching her hair or cross her arms or grab her hand in a desperate attempt to prevent herself from touching her vagina while getting off mentally at the same time. It's really obvious and kinda cute.

thegambler952, /r/incels 33 Comments [3/12/2017 1:13:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125134

Stupid cunt was trying to roast a fellow incel friend and I unleashed on her

Yesterday I went to the shops with a friend of mine and since my friend and I are trying to grow out of inceldom we were trying to make small talk with good looking girls and my friend when buying a movie ticket saw a relatively good looking girl, probably around a 6-7/10. He went up to her when buying a ticket and I sunk into the backdrop as I let him try to do his thing, the typical "Do I know you from somewhere?" routine and things, I thought, were going well. She was about to give the ticket over and held it back and asked "Are you hitting on me?" he responded with something like "well yeah I saw you and I went to this register just because I thought you were pret-" she cuts him off with "Ohhhh 'kaaay..well can you not? I'd never dare to be seen with someone as ugly as you her friend leans in and starts giggling. Did you even know if I had a boyfriend? Because I do, so please fuck off."

I was standing there in shock and then I finally burst with rage, asking her how much of a cunt she is and how fucked up her face was. I'm a decent looking incel so she couldn't really say much. I laid into her about her disgusting frizzy hair and her crooked sickening nose and how small her tits are and that she should be happy any guys hit on her whatsoever. My heart was rapid as I stuttered out insults about her disgusting skin tone and acne. She eventually walked away and as we walked away I turned around and she had her head in her hands sobbing and her coworker was trying to console her. As soon as we got out of the movie she was gone, I assume she got sent home.

Stupid fucking cunt, this is what you get. I'm sick of it. I'm pissed and I'm not taking this shit anymore, roasties will get fucking demolished anytime they try to be cunts.

Women are shit and after yesterday I have given up on the "hunt"

incel_INHELL, /r/incels 38 Comments [3/4/2017 5:21:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126675

In 2008, writing under the username FredFredrickson, Fisher posited that the notion that “rape is bad” was not an absolute truth. He wrote, “I’m going to say it—Rape isn’t an absolute bad, because the rapist I think probably likes it a lot. I think he’d say it’s quite good, really.”

Though he stated he “doesn’t advocate breaking the law,” Fisher said online in 2012 that a 40-year-old man asking to see the breasts of a 15-year-old wasn’t creepy. Instead, he said it was “evolutionarily advantageous and perfectly natural.”

As a candidate for state representative, Fisher proposed bringing concerns about the supposed plague of false rape accusations into the statehouse. Hosting a forum on Reddit under the username RobertFisherforNH, Fisher sought ideas to prevent “innocent people [from] receiving jail time.” He argued that because in rape cases “police err on the side of caution,” and show a high level of support for victims, the system was “susceptible to abuse” by women.

Robert Fisher, State Representative NH 9th district, We Hunted The mammoth 14 Comments [4/26/2017 12:13:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 118462

This is the brief story of my second gf and her silly, irrational actions. Bear in mind, she is likely my best female friend today.

1.I meet her on a dating site. She just broke up with her boyfriend. I'm still a virgin at the time and she's very uninterested in meeting, wasting our time in fruitless bs talks about nothing.
2.I lose my virginity with some slut and tell this to her. She
a) immediately goes back to her ex AND b)immediately wants a meeting with me
3.We meet and she wants me, not her bf
4.She breaks up with her bf and says she wants to be with me
5.She meets me the second time after this. But now I'm no longer interesting to her. Now she blocks me on Fb.
6.She wants to get back to her "bf", he doesn't want her back.
7.Three months pass. She contacts me again, asking me to solve some fucking problem of hers. I decline and block her on Facebook. She then sends me an SMS, offering sex.
8.She tries to torture me by making up excuses to "give up" on sex and then offering it again ( she later, when we were already in a relationship, admitted these were all fake "changes of mind").
9.I finally snap and post her pic on my blog. She then finally agrees to really have sex with me - under the condition that I no longer contact her.
10.We have sex and I no longer contact her. But she contacts me. (EDIT - some of the insaner manginas online used to claim she did so because she was afraid I'd "blackmail" her again. However, that's just insanity by manginas, since when we stopped contacting I had no more pics of her. When she contacted me again I was BACK ON HER FRIEND LIST AND COULD SEE ALL HER PICS AGAIN). So we start a relationship.
11.Our relationship is a joke and she is a crazy woman.
12.We finally, after about a month and a half, see it's not working and break it off.
13.She briefly goes back to her previous "bf" who fucks her once but then dumps him as well.
14.After some months of me doing other stuff we get back in contact and are friends now. She's a lesbian now. She destroys her relationship with some woman.
Still, in summer of 2014 she start dating one of my best friends but dumps him after a week or two, before they even had sex, because she now finally decided to be a full lesbian.
15.In early 2015 she has such a fight with her schizophrenic mother that she has to come to my place, which I don't want to allow her without fucking me. She does and is angry about it for some time, making a fuss over nothing, but eventually we go on being friends like nothing happened. After all, by that time connections are too strong and we share even some financial interests, along with co-operation in various areas. We depend on each other too much in any case. This helps mend any conflicts but the fact is also that we're by now used to each other and share some common traits - it's not like hate each other but have to tolerate each other. I like her as a person and we share a history.


modern Western women are completely insane. It's a waste of time to try and find logic in the actions. What they do is often as random as throwing a dice. So don't expect anything, especially anything good.

actual full lesbians don't exist

women in general base their appreciation of a man on how successful he is in attracting other women - how this is achieved and his objective qualities are irrelevant. You can be a smelly rapist with an IQ of 70, she will like you more than a virgin with an IQ of 170.

consent is a nonsensical concept in modern society. It's a word that is used to protect female chastity and husband's property, not ignoring the whims of some slut. Modern Western women will hate you if you think about consent. You need to show you have a spine and fuck them regardless of their stupid whims, or they won't respect you.

Relationships in the modern Western world are a joke. Your "gf's" or "wife's" pussy is everybody else's as well as "yours" - and laws are made that way too. There is basically nothing a husband or a boyfriend can do about a cheating wife and pathetic cucks will always protect these sluts. So have no qualms about fucking other men's wives or girlfriends in the West - if you won't somebody else will. Besides, the guy they claim to be with is doing the same to other men's "gf's" and "wives". Expect absolutely no fidelity of any "gf" you will have in a feminist culture - it's like expecting a cat to not eat that steak when you leave the cat with it in a room to go grocery shopping. Fidelity is achieved in a sane patriarchal culture by marrying women off as virgins, making being a slut an undesirable trait and not allowing any feminist laws. In the Western culture your "gf's" or "wives" pussy is E-V-E-R-Y-B-O-D-Y'S and she is not fit to be a caring wife and a mother. You will be raising some retard's children, not your own.

caamib, r/Truecels 48 Comments [4/25/2016 3:20:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 119171

Summarizing some of the points here :

The scarcer reproductive resource is the one far more valued than the less scarce one.


The scarcer reproductive resource is the slower to evolve, and hence obstructs the overall evolution of the species.

The scarcer reproductive resource has the more specialized skills, as there is not enough room for too many skills outside of those ancillary to reproduction.

Once a species has any purpose beyond mere reproduction, the scarcer reproductive resource starts to become obsolete, as they cannot transition to any other useful role.

The scarcer reproductive resource makes virtually no contribution to anything that a more advanced civilization would measure our progress on, which pretty much comes down to space exploration and matter/energy harnessing.

Hence, the scarcer reproductive resource is really just a stepping stone towards the eventual evolutionary endgame, which breaks the Fermi paradox.

So yes, this does explain the Fermi paradox. Out of millions of species’ that have ever existed, only one has become sentient. In the same way, out of millions of civilizations that reach our level, perhaps only one manages to adapt around the scarcer reproductive resource.

Anon, Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology 29 Comments [5/22/2016 1:50:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 134925

Here's an unpopular opinion: I'm actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations.

And more importantly: The benefit of all of us getting to finally tell the truth + the impact on victims FAR outweigh the loss of any one man's reputation.

Sorry. If some innocent men's reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is a price I am absolutely willing to pay.

Emily Lindin, Twitter 12 Comments [12/6/2017 11:40:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 125782

Women don't like being called "female", I thought of some of other words that might be used.

• wimminz
• whores
• bitches
• cunts
• cum dumpsters
• baby factories
• penis caps
• penis gyms
• kitchen slaves
• female humanoid organisms
• carbon rich envaginated structures
• the annoying, dumb, inferior pieces of flesh around the vagina that don't invent or discover things
• cocksleeve
• roastie
• sperm garage
• Harpies
• The niggers of gender
• jizzum snorter

I couldn't think of anymore. Feel free to add more. I really do hate them with a burning passion.

kazcovic, /r/incels 18 Comments [3/28/2017 4:59:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 125728

Having a waifu is just another form of female worship

Cut that shit out.

Stop worshipping fictional female characters, it's pathetic and THEY'RE WOMEN FOR FUCKS SAKE.

Hell I'd say that simply liking a female character is just another form of female worship.

Females need to be violently shoved off the pedestal, not put on an even higher one.

All females deserve our utter hatred. Including ones that aren't real.

IFA_MTBL, /r/incels 11 Comments [3/25/2017 11:16:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 135669

Female degeneracy camps

In a just world, society would take full on action to keep femoids in line without letting them fall into the abyss of degeneration. And to do so, society would hold mandatory evaluations every year where femoids who are eighteen years of age would be subjected to undergo a virginal test. And if the results of this unveil certain femoids as tainted and impure, then they would be sent to a specialized camp run by Incel men where their assets are optimized to the fullest capacity.

Once these degenerate femoids enter the camp they would each be given a collar to wear. The speciality of these collars is that a tracking microchip would be integrated in everyone of them to surveillance the location of each femoid to make sure that they don't escape. Incels who run the camp would have small device with them, in which, if the femoid they are in charge of acts disobediently or has gone somewhere it wasn't instructed to, then by a press of a button they could activate the collar which would result in the slut who is wearing the collar being electrocuted.

The femoids in the camp would be subjected to various forms of punishments depending on the degenerate actions they have committed. For an example: bitches who have slept with less than five random men would have to undergo six mandatory lashes every other day, while the bitches who have slept with more than five random men would have to undergo twelve. The days they are not subjected to any lashing, the femoids would have to complete a course where the cunts who have slept with less than five men would have to carry a pack of rocks which would weigh forty five pounds and run four miles, while the bitches who have slept with more than five men would have to carry a pack of rocks which would weigh sixty pounds and run six miles. Refusal and being unable to complete the course would result in the femoid being beaten to death.

Every night Incel men who are in charge of these femoids would be able to enter the cells where these cum dumpsters are placed and have sexual intercourse with these cunts while also releasing whatever sexual frustration they have on them. Also, every weekend virgin men from all around would be granted access to the camp, to which, they would also be able to do whatever they please with the femoids.

The purpose of these degeneracy camps is not only to optimize femoid sexual organs and punish them for the degenerate acts they have committed, but also to warn all the femoids by telling them that this would be the retribution they would have to face if they engage in acts of degeneracy.

Lookismisreal, 12 Comments [1/2/2018 9:41:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 126218

Women didn't want you because you respect them and you didn't want to rape because you know nothing about women. If you knew anything about women you'd know that you caused them more suffering by just existing like that and not raping them.

Caamib, FSTDT 26 Comments [4/11/2017 9:12:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 126279

From comics, movies, anime, gaming, and now the more recent kids shows, feminists will use any kind of tactic to promote their evil. Stories like Rapunzel or The Sleeping Beauty have been a part of our childhood, teaching us about gender roles and the importance of them. Now they have been changed in various ways to suit modern women, giving them unrealistic expectations of what they can be. Here are nine characters that show how they have infiltrated entertainment.

Steven Universe

The show deals with an entire species that is genderless but has feminine traits (female human forms), Steven is a male protagonist that is not masculine in a lot of ways. Rather than being the strong fighter type, he acts through femininity despite being male. He cries for help from women rather than helping himself. The show contains trans, queer and homosexual characters which is typical for a show like this. They have women of different sizes and has quite a dark story line for a show aimed for children. Cartoon Network is now giving a way for brainwashing, glorifying obese women and unhealthy diets.

They even place the emphasis on disguised leftist concepts like:

Tolerance – Praising of everything non-white, non-male and non-heterosexual
Minority – non-whites, non-male and degenerates
Inclusiveness – Accepting everything non-white and degenerate
Emancipation – Disregarding rules made by conservative males

But despite all these teachings, SJWs bullied a Steven Universe artist to attempt suicide because she drew Rose (an obese female character) too thin. Hypocritical? Yes. It certainly has one of the most cancerous fanbases, consisting of bronies and white knights.

Wonder Woman

Not even girls want to be girls so long as our feminine archetype lacks force, strength, and power. Not wanting to be girls, they don’t want to be tender, submissive, peace-loving as good women are. Women’s strong qualities have become despised because of their weakness. The obvious remedy is to create a feminine character with all the strength of Superman plus all the allure of a good and beautiful woman.”

– William Moulton Marston, in a 1943 issue of The American Scholar.

Comics publisher Max Gaines asked him to create a new superhero for their comics, to fill the void he felt existed with something new. The creator knew that he wanted his hero to embrace love over violence, and to value peace over war. He assumed that women value love and peace. He valued independent, educated, and unconventional women.

Wonder Woman remains a feminist icon 75 years after her creation, because she symbolizes the idea of female domination. According to NY Post, Wonder Woman was not ‘feminist’ enough for Social Justice Warriors, because SJWs and feminists are never happy with anything in society until white men are silenced. Most wonder woman comics were terrible, but the media keeps pushing it on readers that they HAVE to give in.


Buffy the Vampire Slayer creator Joss Whedon is allegedly a woke male feminist ally. He’s a mangina allegedly known for directing “strong female characters”. His characters are unrealistic as women simply can never be tough. He cares about fake women’s issues like the pay gap and the alleged success of lady Ghostbusters. Joss is directing Batgirl, the story about a super heroine who is basically Batman but a woman. Currently he’s facing back-lash on Twitter, but in smaller amounts due to more and more people accepting these kind of reboots.


This game is tainted by women who blame their problems on men. Basically, every character in Overwatch has different victory pose animations that a player can unlock and choose from. And for the time-traveling character Tracer (one of the female characters in the game), her victory pose gives players a wonderful view of her buttocks, clad in skin-tight leggings. Obviously, if men are enjoying something there must be feminist intervention, so Blizzard changed her appearance and stated:

We’ll replace the pose. We want *everyone* to feel strong and heroic in our community. The last thing we want to do is make someone feel uncomfortable, under-appreciated or misrepresented. Apologies and we’ll continue to try to do better.

Women expose themselves to men in conventions, and when they are assaulted they complain that “men should respect women,” even when their own clothes were designed to attract men. But when a character in a video game wears skimpy clothing, there is an outright backlash against it. Overwatch is even taking strides to be LGBT inclusive. This marks the end of straight white man in entertainment.

Wandering Son

Wandering Son follows two fifth graders who do not identify with the genders they were assigned at birth. Shuichi Nitori identifies as a girl, and Yoshino Takatsuki identifies as a boy. This series marks the end of an era, modern anime has come to suit feminist tastes. The rest is pretty self explanatory.


The 80s film, starring Tom Hanks and Daryl Hannah, is set for a reboot with Channing Tatum starring as the “merman”. The original Splash was about a man, Allen Bauer (Hanks), who falls in love with the mermaid (Daryl Hannah) who rescued him when he was a boy. Their relationship is hampered somewhat by the fact that the mermaid (who later names herself Madison) has to return to the sea after just a few short days, and also by the deranged scientist determined to prove that merpeople are real by throwing water at her.

Since the announcement, many feminists have been celebrating the gender swap on social media – particularly Tatum’s casting as a merman as some kind of feminist victory… but why? Because of the casting of a white, straight male in a role that was originally held by a woman. Hollywood’s content has become more man-hating than ever before. Seeing men in feminine roles is a way of brainwashing men to be submissive and less masculine.

Gender swapping is fast becoming a fail-safe way for Hollywood to shut up anyone who kicks off about equality without actually having to write anything new: Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, Sleeping Beauty, 101 Dalmatians, Ghostbusters. All these films have either been made or are in the works and all of them have some kind of “feminist twist”. I’ve seen these gender bends in anime too, although no one seems to notice because anime gender bending is normalized.


Your character is non-ambiguous (genderless) and non-white, which one could assume it is Asian or Mexican. They never refer to you as “him” or “her”. Despite having a small amount of characters, it managed to include homosexual relationships and a transgender robot. There are more homosexual couples than their opposite counterparts, and both the prominent female characters break out of gender roles. Undyne being the best fighter in the underground, another unrealistic feminist expectation that women can be better than men.

Do you see where “progressiveness” in gaming is really heading? Because the game pushes “progressive propaganda”. One of the major themes of the game that people have been gloating about is the notion that gay relationships are wonderful and perfect, straight relationships are doomed, diversity is strength, promoting inter-species romantic relationships, and it’s primarily because of this thematic content that the game gets praised. That is why Tumblr is spamming the votes, and the media is circle-jerking over the game. Nearing the end of the game I dawned upon the similarities of this game and Steven Universe. There’s nothing particularly special about the game except for discreetly lecturing you about homosexuality and political correctness.

Sailor Moon

It redefined the “magical girl” genre in its native Japan and its overseas influence has shown up in girl-power shows like The Powerpuff Girls and is the definition of a feminist anime. Haruka and Michiru, the series’ Sailor Uranus and Neptune, were a lesbian couple who helped girls around the world come to terms with their sexuality (lesbian propaganda). The series also makes a point of looking down on femininity, by showing how the less feminine girls have trouble coping with gender roles, like how Makoto learned to cook because she was teased for being a tomboy.
Though, I somewhat find it astonishing that the creator of the site anime feminist doesn’t care about “fanservice”, which is short softcore porn scenes, it occured to me because they know about the female supremacy in anime.

Life Is Strange

The creators of the game met with resistance to make the protagonist female. It’s a story about a girl named Max who learns that she can time travel. Life is Strange are some of the few games that are telling women’s untold stories in ways that make it seem as if women have it harder.

It’s simply a game made to exaggerate and show how cruel men can be to women (almost every man in the game is either a loser or a woman beating trash). It attempts to lecture you and say things like “these men need to be in check” whenever it finds the chance to. This game was published by SQUARE ENIX who also published Tomb Raider. Why is it that those people who push equality so much then decide to make a game where it’s about the girl, never around the male?


Modern entertainment is becoming more about social justice than hardware, software, story, gameplay, or animation, while we get to endure feminists complain about everything they don’t like, ruining entertainments we were once able to enjoy.

Ryan Ashville, Return of Kings 25 Comments [4/13/2017 1:49:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 141188

[In response to an IncelTears post about the yoga studio shooting in Tallahassee, Florida that was confirmed to have been committed by an incel]

Fucking amazing. Those fucking worthless cunts deserved it. I implore you to heed the same advice as you fucking whores give incels. "Just get over it". FUCK ALL OF YOU. "The world isnt fair" yep, it's not. So I dont give a fuck is some stuck up cunts got murdered. Doesnt feel so good to have your bloodline snuffed out, does it? When I hear things like this, it makes me happy I'm alive. I'd never do anything like this but it fills me with so much fucking joy when it happens. I would spit on these fucking CUNT's graves if I could.

MountedBass9291, r/IncelTears 9 Comments [11/15/2018 3:07:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Pax Prosperitas Sophia

Quote# 123378

As had been previously explained, America had pretty much for all intents and purposes died by 1920 and the disastrous decision of the 19th Amendment, though some opinions place the beginning of the end even earlier, in 1800s. So in this aspect, which is a crucial one, America will not return to sanity. Trump won’t abolish women’s suffrage, he won’t bring women back into kitchens, none of this will happen. Did the Bush presidency restore the value of American women? Did the Reagan presidency stabilize what was a rapidly plummeting value of American women in the 80s (of course, with certain noble exceptions of women in backwoods areas, exceptions which still exist today) ? No, the battle is lost. The best aspect in terms of women will be, as Roosh says, to make it easier to find a fellow traveler. But even there you need to be careful which traveler to choose.

In terms of feminism, SJWs, alt-right etc, all of these things are kinda irrelevant ultimately if you look at the paragraph above, which outlines the real crux of the issue. Without abolishing women’s suffrage, without a hasty return to strict patriarchy, nothing of real relevance will happen. And we know Trump could never do that

caamib, Caamib blog 35 Comments [1/1/2017 11:14:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 125499

Much as I like to trumpet the importance of a woman's right to choose all things at all times, there's one choice I simply cannot understand: the choice of an otherwise sane and healthy woman not to have children.

If a would-be mother is a singleton of 40 who decides to have a baby without a partner, I might wish she'd thought of it sooner and prepared for it better - but I understand.

If she's half of a lesbian couple who 'borrows' the wherewithal, I might cross my fingers that the child is not teased at school - but I understand. Even if she's a 66-year- old pregnant pensioner, threatening to turn motherhood into a freak show, I might (indeed, I do) think she's monstrously selfish and dangerously wrong - but again, more or less, I understand.

Yet if she says she hasn't a shred of maternal feeling in her, moreover, if she says she would prefer to concentrate on her career and that a child would only get in the way of it, then my head might acknowledge her right to do so. But my heart whispers: 'Lady, you're weird.'

It was welcome news, therefore, to discover this week that I am not alone. Research conducted over six years shows that far from bosses and colleagues always being suspicious of a working mother, the opposite is becoming true: it is the childless woman who is regarded as cold and odd.

As a result, it is these single-track careerists who are increasingly likely to be vilified, refused jobs and denied promotion because many employers believe them to lack what the study calls 'an essential humanity'. And I know exactly what they mean.

In the little hothouse of my own trade as a hack, I play a game with myself. Reading all the other female scribblers, sometimes with grudging admiration and sometimes none at all, I try to guess from their expression of their world view whether or not they are mothers.

I haven't - yet - been wrong. Now, with MPs so much in the headlines, I've extended the game and started to guess about the women among them, too.

As far as I can tell, my score is also pretty high there - even though it's just a feeling. On both sides of the political divide, as with the writers, it's not what MPs say or do, so much as how they go about it.

'Mothers bring something extra'

And if that touch of 'essential humanity' - or its absence - colours such notably tough professions, it's hardly surprising that employers are starting to notice that the same applies across the spectrum of workplaces.

Of course, we need not be silly about it.

Nobody wishes to see a female soldier in combat with a six-week-old infant in one arm and a rifle in the other.

Or a high-flier working 20-hour days while still breast-feeding. Or the mother of a small brood taking on any job of such erratic hours that she cannot promise them when or even if she'll be home.

But most jobs aren't like that - and most children don't stay babies for long.

Besides which, in my experiences both as a colleague and an employer, I have found that mothers almost always bring something extra to the job, to the benefit of all.

It's not the mothers, for a start, who are going to turn up late and hungover after a night on the razz; they'll have been up, dressed and alert for hours, having cooked a family breakfast and delivered their children to school. On time.

It's not the mothers, usually, who run the office bitch-fest.

They're not there to compete for the attentions of the male executives; they're there to get out of the house; they're there because they genuinely enjoy some adult company; and they're there because they have mouths to feed other than their own and shoes to buy for someone else's feet.

Two-thirds of working mothers, a recent survey found, could not provide for the children they love in the manner they would wish if they lost their jobs. So there's incentive for you.

They will, it is true, snatch time off for poorly children and Christmas carol services. And it's true they will insist that, in return for arriving on the dot of 9am, they must also leave on the dot of 5pm.

But rarely have I encountered a mother who did not offer to make up time lost, often in lunch hours. As for leaving on time, put enough mothers together in one workplace and you'll get rid of the ghastly ethos of 'presenteeism', whereby people vie for plaudits based solely on how late - albeit often uselessly - they hang around the office.

The prioritising that may baffle other people is a cinch for a woman who has spent years juggling a household. Negotiating skills? A request for 10 per cent off an overdue invoice is nothing to a woman who has had to broker a deal on Britain's Got Talent versus bedtime.

When it comes to emergencies, if you have run all the way to a clinic with a terrified toddler vomiting down your neck then, trust me, a package delayed in transit is a piece of cake. And if those are the tangibles, the intangibles - the 'essential humanity' - are more important still.

You cannot be a mother without knowing something about selflessness, compassion, generosity, commitment, fierce loyalty and plain hard work. You cannot - surely - be a boss and not value assets such as those in your staff.

Nor is it the boss who pays the price for the extras a mother brings with her; she's the one who pays for that. Enough reams have been written about the long hours of slog it takes to run a home and hold down a job at the same time. Yet still we keep doing it because we want our work, our independence and our money.

But, more than all the things we want, we actually need our children; they complete us as women, they are our light and our love and our legacy.

We feel desperately sorry for those who yearn for children they cannot have; the unwilling barren, if you will. But when we meet a woman who chooses her childlessness in the belief that there is something out there worth more, we smile politely even while - once again - our guts whisper: 'Lady, you're weird.'

So three cheers for the employers who are catching on, the ones who don't want to people their workforces with the cold, the calculating, the sad and the mad. The only question is: what took you so long?

Carol Sarler, Daily Mail 17 Comments [3/18/2017 2:52:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 135377

Every man has their own thought up image in how they want their partner to be; even if the idea itself is nothing but wishful thinking. A deep desire to acquire the most perfect femoid is integrated in everyone of us, but unfortunately, such femoids do not exist. Simply due to the reason that the evil femoid nature does not allow it to be so. But, just for the sake of this thread, let's say perfect femoids do exist. So, here's the list of what I require from it:

Femoid must be a pure virgin (even anally)

Femoid should have never masturbated

Femoid must have no knowledge of sex or any kind of pleasures related to it

Femoid should have never had a partner before me
Femoid must not be obese

Femoid must love me unconditionally to a point where it would would die for me

Femoid must refer to itself as "cum slut"

Femoid must never cheat

Femoid must be extremely loyal, faithful, and trustworthy

Femoid must have no male friends/contact except me

Femoid must be obedient and honour all my requests

Femoid must not question my authority

Femoid must know that I am its temple and will do nothing to incinerate it

Femoid must stay with me forever until death do us apart

Femoid must commit sati if I was to die in an uncertain death before my time

Lookismisreal, r/MaleForeverAlone 20 Comments [12/21/2017 2:14:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 115934

You are certainly not a man but a mangina. Toeing the line of female supremacy for the scent of vagina.

We've already discussed scientifically that women are little more than walking wombs and consumption machines. Please don't compensate for my last slamming by pretending to be intelligent, it's pathetic. You don't expect me to regard anything you say about science when you have to pretend to be an armchair, nickel and dime, pop psychologist.

The truth is you really don't care what I have to say. You just need to be SEEN to care by women to get that pat on the head and a couple brownie point from women seeing as you're on of many men who fear confrontation with females. You also desperately need their approval. I hate to break it to you, mangina, but they're not going to fly across the globe to suck your little pee pee.

You are not a man.

Isaiah4verse1, r/MGTOW 16 Comments [1/10/2016 4:15:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 126479

A woman has to be exceptionally stunningly beautiful to pull off a tattoo. But that's defeating the whole purpose right? Ugly girls in search of identity are the ones who get tattoos.

But if I'm out getting chicks and I snag one with a tattoo, she is immediately downgraded to sperm urinal. Sure I'll stab them intestines like Mike Meyers but I'd never commit to a chick with tattoos.

As a rule of thumb, each tattoo on a girl symbolizes each 50 dudes she let piss sperm in her womb.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 11 Comments [4/19/2017 12:41:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 130107

(Title of a link sharing a young girl's suicide video from a gore site)
Future 12 year old whore realizes her mistakes and does the world a favor

uglywindows10babies, /r/Truecels 8 Comments [8/4/2017 1:29:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128825

i can't fucking take this anymore
how are women still allowed to walk the earth like human beings
why are they not leashed like dogs and walking on fours naked in parks?
why why whyyyy
it's not fucking FAAAIR

itsjustnotfairwhy, r/incels 15 Comments [7/4/2017 8:24:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129577

Anonymous, /r/IncelTears 15 Comments [7/21/2017 2:37:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: TB Tabby

Quote# 115933

So what? Nobody likes women least of all women themselves. The only thing they have of value is their vagina. No one likes what's attached to the vagina. Do you guys really care what some twat thinks? I've read 8th grade class newspapers with better writing skills than the average female "journalist".

Isaiah4verse1, r/MGTOW 27 Comments [1/10/2016 4:15:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 128503

It should be legal for incels to rape females if they use protection and the female is unconscious

Inceldom is a deprivation of a basic human need. If an incel does rape an unconscious female with protection, the female wouldn’t even know that she was raped. Even if she found out it wouldn’t be that bad. No violence or anything would be used against the female because she would be unconscious. She wouldn’t even remember it. Rape to a female would do way less harm than inceldom does to a man. Overall suffering would be reduced. If a man is an incel long enough to rape a female, then he is the victim, not the villain. No starving man should have to go to prison for stealing food, and no sexually starved man should have to go to prison for raping a female. Without food, the body of a man dies. Without sex, the soul and mind of a man will die. If a man is an incel long enough he will end up going insane sooner or later. This way the females would not remember or know that they were raped. Men would be able to keep their sanity and the suffering of us incels would be ended. In my opinion, it should be legal for incels to rape unconscious females if they use protection to create a better world with no suffering.

Canino1997, R/incels 12 Comments [6/25/2017 11:13:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 128498

[Stamp: Sorry, idiots, but men cannot be abused/raped by women.]

I still can't believe that no one realizes this simple truth. All men want sex. As such, they always consent. There is no such thing as female-on-male rape.
All men like their women weaker than them. They assume they can push their women around. As such, they deserve what's coming to them. There is no such thing as female-on-male abuse.

Elite-the-Protector, Deviantart 17 Comments [6/25/2017 12:56:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Sammettik

Evil Has A Bad Sense Of Humour Award

Quote# 139896

Heroic Bitch Who Pushed Other Bitch Off a Bridge Said That Shit was Lolz as Fuck

You know, I can really respect this mindset.

Pushing some bitch off a bridge is fucking hilarious.

Why is it illegal?

If we’re going to legalize marijuana, surely we can legalize pushing sluts off of bridges.

Fox News:

An 18-year-old woman said she “didn’t think about the consequences” before pushing her 16-year-old friend off a bridge that was 60 feet high — equivalent to six stories — in Washington state last week.

Her friend, Jordan Holgerson, suffered several broken ribs and an injured esophagus and trachea after falling into the river.

“I thought she would be fine,” the teen, Taylor Smith, told ABC News’ “Good Morning America” on Friday. Smith has been charged with reckless endangerment, according to ABC News, a charge that is punishable by up to a year in jail and up to $5,000 in fines.

Earlier this month, a video that showed Holgerson being pushed off a bridge at the Lewis River at Moulton Falls Regional Park in Vancouver went viral on social media before it was removed.

That shit was ultimo lolz.

Gotta admit.

I hate women and don’t think they’re funny, but that was truly hilarious.

Pushing stupid bitches off of bridges is like, a classic joke. Like a fart joke or a joke about someone’s dick.

It is eternal.

It will always be hilarious to push some bitch off a bridge.

If there is one thing we need more of, it is more stupid skanks getting pushed off bridges.

Andrew Anglin, Daily Stormer 20 Comments [8/18/2018 1:13:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 24448

We a very happy young couple. My wife is a submissive wife and we believe that the man is the Head of the Household. We are seeking a submissive live-in to be part of our family. She needs to be under 30 b/c she cannot be older than my wife. She needs to be able to perform light housework, child care, and other duties.

We are both college educated with my wife attending medical school. Our marriage is Christian based and the sub-in-training must have the same beliefs.

She must be willing to be trained as a submissive in the house. There is no sex involved with the husband. At the moment, no sex is planned with the wife but that may change.

The sub must be willing to be disciplined and trained by the HOH as he sees fit. We would like to move slowly and have a lot of conversations via the internet before we would even think about talking live.

At the moment, we can only provide room and board so the sub must be willing to work part-time. All that could change when the wife b/c a doctor.
Please email pics if you are interested or want more information.

pers-320555401, craigslist 46 Comments [4/30/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 125948

What would your ideal sex slave be like

• 5' tall with a lolita build

• Intact hymen

• Cute face

• Watches anime and plays vidya while sitting on my lap (erection)

• Never had, or will have contact with men other than me

• Willing to do FFM threesomes with me, and will actively find chicks for us to fuck

• Enthusiastically submits to any sexual demands I make

• Squirts female ejaculate like a firehose

• Extremely devoted, loyal and self sacrificing and does all the domestic slave chores like cooking and cleaning

• Raises all our children with a minimum of input from me and never gets fat no matter how many times impregnated

• Cute innie pussy that smells/tastes of berries and cream, that has never been devastated by Chad or Tyrone

• Willing to raise our female descendants to be free sex faeries who will rescue the men of r/incels from their subhumanity

Why do females like this not exist IRL? Just lol at whoever devised this nightmarish universe.

EveryDayIsANightmare, /r/incels 21 Comments [4/2/2017 7:29:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125505

Women who support gay rights but refuse to have anal sex are the weakest race.What do you think your gay besties are doing behind closed doors, honey? Holding hands while humming "It's Raining Men?"

Matt Forney, Gab 19 Comments [3/18/2017 1:18:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 138288

A father is supposed to teach his daughter how to be a woman that services a man's needs. All of a man's needs. After helping to give her life, raising and supporting her, it's only fair that the father gets something in return. The best gift a daughter can give her father is that tight young virgin pussy. All dad's deserve it. A dad works hard so that she is taken care of that feeling of that tight pussy gripping his cock is well deserved. She is his property. Her place is at our feet, cooking our meals, washing our filthy underwear cleaning our toilets and draing our balls. Just imagine slipping your full grown daddy dick into that tiny pussy stretching her to the max before giving you a new daughter to molest

evilsmurf, Incelocalypse 12 Comments [6/22/2018 12:18:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: FSM

Quote# 100643

Dana’s actually in pretty big trouble, having been charged on five felony counts. This isn’t your run of the mill accusation that so many of us divorced men have had to deal with, but real, criminal charges. The feminist activism, castration, LGBT awareness work, interfering with India’s culture — all for naught.

A woman’s privilege is her birthright, and a man can’t earn it no matter how hard he tries.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 12 Comments [4/22/2014 3:02:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Straw Dystopia Award

except the OP thinks it's utopia

Quote# 127407

Just consider this for a second:

Women would be sold at bustling markets in order to be used as sex toys/domestic servants/breeding slaves, with the higher quality ones possibly being entered in beauty competitions with large prizes for incels with the most high quality and fertile women.

There'd also be breeding centers if you want to donate some of your cum in order to get a son with the highest quality genes, and zoos where you could admire sluts and harlots in their natural environments: kitchens, bedrooms, and dark cold caves.

As for normies and Chads, we could use them for organs, meat, labor, slaves, punching bags, or even just luxury items for incels who want to own more then just women. (Not to mention any homosexual/bisexual incels who'd like a sex toy. After all, an incel is an incel, no matter their sexuality, and we all deserve our own high quality sex toys.)

Of course, women, normies, and Chads would all lose the ability to vote, as they would automatically vote for the person most sympathetic to them, and thus the one who is most likely to give them more (undeserved) rights.

As for nearcels and volcels, they'd basically have the same rights as non-Chad men do currently, although they wouldn't have all the benefits that incels and truecels would get in this new society, such as the ability to buy women and/or normies in bulk, or the ability to hold high positions of political power.

Wizards and KHHV incels would, of course, hold the most power, and would be the ones most likely to have careers in politics and law enforcement (AKA keeping women and normies in their places).

And, if we really need one, we'll make a free woman/normie rank, for those extremely rare women and normies that have proven themselves capable of actual rational thought and genuine intellect. This rank enables them to get jobs, own property, publish/sell content that they've created, and (occasionally) say no to sex/labor. Of course, free women/normies would be few and far in between, and their rank would be stripped from them the moment they attempted to disobey or harm an incel, and they would be automatically be forced into prostitution/labor, and would be auctioned off to a lucky pimp/slave master as soon as possible.

This would be a far better, far happier world IMHO.

rango-mango, 22 Comments [5/22/2017 1:11:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Skitten219

Quote# 43845

Homosexuals are male. Lesbians are female. The etiologies of the two are very different and they are not the same thing.

Homosexuality is about penetration and ejaculation, ie, sex. It's wild and unrestrained. It's what men are without women: Fascistic and self-worshiping.

Lesbianism is about emotionalism and feeling safe, ie, security. It's domestic and reined in. It's what women are without men: Manipulative and self-pitying.

Lesbians are not homosexuals. Homosexuals are not lesbians.

DesertFox, Free Conservatives 81 Comments [7/30/2008 12:44:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 140607

UTOPIA: what would a women’s society look like?

I haven’t been writing in a while, and it’s not because I don’t like writing any more but things have accelerated elsewhere in my life and I can’t be involved everywhere at once. As this isn’t paid work, obviously I can’t afford to put blogging first.

Anyway, there are still many posts waiting to be finished. In the meantime, I’ll start another one.

I often muse about all the things that we’d need to change about patriarchy if we abolished men’s rule over women and the earth. Everything and every single aspect of social organisation is so much the opposite of how it should be, it’s dizzying to even begin to think about all the things we should stop / change.

Mostly it’s about men stopping from doing harm. But stopping men isn’t enough because beyond that there is the entire world to relearn, to heal, and our entire society to rebuild. We would be faced with the immense task of replacing all the misogynist, genocidal, biocidal practices men have ordered our society with for eons. So many of us now are acculturated, cut from land, nature and from one another.

If we managed to overcome men’s tyranny over us, how would we rebuild our world? I just want to throw some ideas here that I often come across these days. I dream for concrete, down-to-earth, simple and easily applicable measures of stepping out of patriarchy into a female-loving, biophilic world. This isn’t by any means a realistic plan of how to achieve it, but just reading it makes me feel happy. It makes it feel more real, more possible. Enjoy!


Men’s position in society

Before we do anything, the very first measure to adopt is to take all men out of all positions of decision-making immediately, and actually out of any kind of social, professional position whatsoever.

Major serial killers, serial torturers, pimps, pornographers, severe domestic abusers, serial rapists, genocide planners, biocide planners and pedocriminals across the world will simply be euthanised: the decisions will be taken by women in a mass world tribunal for patriarchal crimes. This is by far the best solution, and is the most legitimate, ethical way of reducing male population to more reasonable levels. Such men would otherwise forever pose a threat to women, children, animals, the earth and society as a whole, and we know they have no chance of ceasing their violent behaviour after having reached such an advanced stage of sadism and sociopathy. It would be reckless to spend space, resources and energy in keeping them alive in prisons.

All of men’s (alive and euthanised) belongings, property, resources and land will be confiscated from men and handed back to female care and supervision – property rights over land will be abolished. You can’t own land!

All men at least above 15 (or younger if very asocial) should live separately from women and children, on their own in small huts or studios, isolated from one another and scattered around so that women can keep an eye on them (they should never be in groups or packs, that would be illegal). So it would also be illegal for male adults to impose their presence on females, girls and children. Men would have to care for themselves on their own: food, laundry, etc. No male above his age of puberty would be allowed to receive any kind of service from a female. Their life expectancy would probably drop to the age of 40, but that’s how things should be. Women’s life expectancy without men would rise to 130 years at least.

PIV would be illegal too of course, as well as the initiation of any verbal or physical contact to women and girls or boy children, unless solicited by a woman for specific matters. I’m not sure what to do about boy children. Obviously you know my opinion, but let’s say that’s up to the mother to decide what she wants to do before he turns of age to leave the female family circle.

In order to keep all men and post-pubescent boys busy, we’d send them to clean up the vast amounts of detritus, pollution and toxic wastes men have littered and almost killed the world with. Much of the damage to the earth is irreversible, however with a great deal of effort and genius, women will find sustainable, natural and simple ways of healing a lot of the damage men have caused, and send men off to do the dirty work. No man will be allowed to take any decision without female guidance. We know what happens when men decide on their own! DISASTER.

Family, child-raising and reproduction

Fathers’ rights will cease to exist. There is no such thing as fatherhood — as we all know, it’s a myth. Men will necessarily lose all and any power to dominate and control women’s reproductive capacities.

It’s the inalienable right of each woman to control every phase of her reproduction and life creation. Abortion will be possible at any stage of pregnancy, however there will hardly be such a thing as undesired pregnancy since there won’t be any men forcing pregnancies on us any more. Abortion will nonetheless be recognised for the trauma, mutilation and loss of life that it is. The number of children and human population will naturally decrease to sustainable levels, so will the number of males born. Women will be free to experiment parthenogenesis or procreation with two female eggs.

The nuclear family will be abolished, in particular the parent’s property rights and absolute power over her child. Children will be considered as persons in need for autonomy and all form of punishment, authority or educational manipulation over children will equally be abolished. Raising and caring for children will be a collective responsibility for women, and motherhood / childcare and especially capacity to be empathetic towards children will be taken very seriously, as something that needs to be (re)learned and studied over years before being fully competent for this immense task.

Schools as we know them as punitive reclusion centres for grooming into male domination and female subordination (as well as selection system for elite executors of patriarchal institutions) will be abolished. Boys would definitely not be around the girls, certainly not most of the time, and never beyond the age of puberty. And obviously no adult male would be allowed near children.

There will be no such thing as “teachers” with positions of authority over children. “Guiders” could learn also from the children or students as much the students from them. We’d learn anything we’d want from languages to sciences to art to music to medicine to building to witchcraft to swimming (etc) without restriction of age or time, as long as it’s adapted to our capacities, level and availability. Learning would be autonomous, with guidance when needed, instead of enforced and dictated. They’d be no need for external reward, marking or punishment because the process of learning in itself is so rewarding and fascinating that it’s self-sufficient. Anyway I could go on and on, non-patriarchal learning is truly riveting.

Social structures between women.

All relationships of authority, domination and subordination will be abolished between all women of all ages. We will be able to recognise each other’s strengths, expertise, guidance and capacities (or lack of) without it implying superiority, inferiority, veneration or lack of respect. We would find each other beautiful. We would live our friendships, love and affection for women unhindered.


All oppressive male institutions will be abolished after men have been retrieved from them. We obviously won’t keep these institutions. They will return to the nothingness that they belong, just as a distant, bad memory.


No more military, no more army, no more wars! It would be illegal for men to hold weapons. Global peace would be the immediate consequence. Most weapons will be destroyed (or recycled into something else), such as weapons of mass destruction, anti-personnel mines, tanks, machine guns, all manners of terrestrial, marine and air-bombers, and all the many disgusting things men have invented. For the remaining weapons such as guns or blades, women will hold exclusive right of use over them in order to defend ourselves from men, from the risk of them taking power over us again.


States, borders, nations, laws would be abolished and totally dispensed with. Laws mentioning the number of prohibited acts will be kept for men only. Women do not need laws to contain ourselves. Laws were created by the male elite to protect their property from other men. Laws are rigid and static, that’s because their purpose is to hold existing patriarchal powers in place. Our own society would be in constant evolution, improvement, creative renewal, yet grounded in reality and adapted to our needs and circumstances.

Women would be able to move freely.

Societal structures and decision-making assemblies wouldn’t exceed roughly 300 women (representing no more than themselves). Keeping numbers low for cooperation is important because the greater the size of the unit, the more horizontal cooperation becomes difficult and requires vertical hierarchy. Possibilities for peaceful, cooperative organisation between women are infinite – as long as they respect the individual integrity of every female – the group should never weigh over the individual but be a source for support and efficient organisation of collective life and space. There could easily be associations of exchange between different groups and peoples in order for women to cooperate regionally and globally where necessary. There would be no limit in age of participation in decision-making for women and girls, which means adapting the format to different ages and capacities.


Men would be permanently banned from any kind of medical practice. All woman-hating, genocidal institutions such as gynecology, psychiatry, obstetrics, big pharma, the torture of living beings in the name of “scientific experimentation” will be banned. Men’s fragmented, objectifying, sadistic view the human body will be part of history, replaced by biophilic medicine. Medical science will no longer be monopolised by a small elite but available to all at any age where appropriate. The (female) doctor’s role will be to guide the patient in her own healing, never to exercise authority over her or take decisions at her expense. Special healing spaces (where surgery is necessary, etc) will be so nice, warm and welcoming that just being there will make you feel better. The soul and life conditions of a person will always be considered part of the body, and symptoms will always be understood in a holistic way. There will be no more chemical, synthetic and toxic products with often worse side effects than the illness itself it claims to heal.

Perfect health would be the normal state of women anyway, as we will learn by experience and observation what we should eat and do to stay healthy at all seasons and times. Most women will have rediscovered our healing, divination and extra-sensory communication powers.


Patriarchal religions will crumble down with men’s oppressive system. Religious ideologies, along with its hierarchies and vacuous rituals will cease to exist. I believe a woman’s world would be spiritual. Spiritual connection isn’t based on faith but on critical observation and experience, on a real personal connection to the elements, beings and spirits that surround us, and on the real magnetic power of beings.

Economy (tied to ecology):

Obviously, Slavery, men’s exploitation of women, men’s capitalist systems will be abolished too. The most important aspect of male economy is that it’s based on men’s competitive accumulation of resources (by killing, destroying, commodifying, taking control over, extracting the greatest possible amount of life) and based on production of poisonous, addictive, programmed obsolescent goods — in order to win the patriarchal game of achieving greater domination over women and girls.

This necrophilic relationship to the world and the environment will be abolished, to be replaced by biophilic ecological and economic principles. This will encompass every single process of our life activities, from house building, to food consumption, to communication, travelling, furniture making, cooking, etc. They will have to be carefully designed and thought out in a way as to never endanger the survival of any species, never pollute any environment, never require the use of poisonous, non-recyclable materials, never to require indentured labour or exploitation in order to be maintained. This would obviously impact the nature and scale of our activities. “Work” (exploitation and division of labour) as we know it would disappear. It would be the responsibility of each individual or group to sustain herself more or less autonomously.

We should learn to observe our environment and deeply understand the interconnectedness of all beings around us, as well our own impact before deciding whether or how to transform it. Our lives have no more or no less value than those of a rabbit, fly, tree, plant, fish, seashell or stone. For instance, if we pick leaves of some plants, it’s important not to rip the whole plant off, to take only parts of it so it can grow again. Or to only take a few plants (or seashells, whatever) where there are many, so to respect the survival of the species where it is settled. If we cut trees to build our house, replant them. There are also infinite ways of making the most of materials for energy, food or production while using it as efficiently as possible. Building houses in ways that don’t require heating in winter or cooling in the summer. It is now widely known that energy such as electricity can be infinitely renewable if we use wind power, magnetic power, water power… And everything can be made DIY.

We will learn to be autonomous again and make our own clothes, food, furniture, houses, soaps, detergent products – or maybe someone else will make them but most things can be handmade and it’s so much more rewarding.

In a biophilic world, nothing is garbage, nothing is pollution. Everything is conceived so as to be part of a life cycle. This doesn’t mean we should keep the same toothbrush for 50 years or never improve on our machines, technology and infrastructure, but there’s no such thing as a dump, or toxic spilling. All materials should be harmless, recyclable or biodegradable, given back the earth if we no longer need them.

Industrial agriculture and farming:

Genetic modification of plants, pesticides, monoculture, field ploughing and consequent aridification of the land will be considered criminal. Our right to self-sustenance would no more be confiscated by mega food corporations – as they will no longer exist.

Agriculture should always be small-scale, local, and as much as possible be modelled on wildlife, self-growing / self-renewing conditions (the less work and intervention, the better), and especially be conceived so as to nourish and sustain rather than deplete wildlife and environmental balance. Again, possibilities are infinite, we have so much to learn.

And seriously, killing animals you’ve raised yourself in a farm or keeping animals enclosed is cruel. I’m for the liberation of all farm and domestic animals. It’s up to them to decide whether they want to live with us or not, and they should be able to come and go freely. Maybe after a few decades, after the human population has stalled, male population has decreased, and after we’ve made serious efforts for reforestation and restoration of wildlife on the earth, it would probably be fairer to hunt animals occasionally. Right now, given the extinction rate of animal species, I find it criminal to hunt or fish. We don’t need to eat that much meat anyway.

Witchwind, Witchwind.wordpress 22 Comments [9/23/2018 4:54:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 125745

One can only dream of a future where paedophilia has been eradicated, not by killing all men, but by purging society of feminists thus eradicating all paedophilia allegations.

holocaust21, Resisting the coming 21st century holocaust – Men's Rights, Youth Rights, Sexual Rights 19 Comments [3/26/2017 3:55:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: X Hugo

Quote# 127258

Quotes from government officials in India regarding sexual assault

"Rape is sometimes right, sometimes wrong."
Babulal Gaur, Home Minister, Madhya Pradesh (BJP)

"No one commits rape intentionally. It happens by mistake."
Ramsewak Paikra, Home Minister, Chhattisgarh (BJP)

"Boys make mistakes, why hang them? We will change such laws."
Mulayam Singh Yadav, Former Chief Minister, UP

"Women who were raped should also be punished. Women having consensual sex should be hanged."
Abu Azmi, Samajwadi Party State Chief

"You are safe. Why do you worry?"
Akhilesh Yadav, Chief Minister, UP

Various Indian government officials, Tumblr 10 Comments [5/18/2017 12:49:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Thanos6

Father of the Year Award

Quote# 125565

A dad from Texas has been convicted for forcing his 16-year-old daughter to become a prostitute as a punishment for being sexually active. The 46-year-old Scot Rodney Robinson was found guilty of first-degree felony charge and sent away to jail. He plead guilty for forcing her into prostitution at truck stops.

According to KRTK, when the father found out that his daughter was already sexually active at age 16 he wanted to punish her for it. The young girl said that her dad forced her to “service” truck drivers and even took the money she earned.

“He basically told her, ‘If you’re gonna be a wh**e, we’re gonna treat ya like one,'” said JoAnne Musick, chief of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office Sex Crimes Division.

Robinson has a thick criminal record and has already faced charges related to burglary, criminal trespass, drug possession and auto theft.

Scot Rodney Robinson, Buzz Fanzine 20 Comments [3/21/2017 2:23:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125532

Men cannot be raped but we do have our own equivalent, of being cuckolded and tricked into raising somebody who isn’t our own genes which is worse than any of that including prison rape.

Also as for how beta males’ genes from its because patriarchy protected us from the will of hypergamous alpha-hunting women by suppressing their interests, and putting mens’ first. Without patriarchy betas wouldn’t be here.

Women produce nothing of value in this world, they exploit us men for it and we have nothing to lose but our chains in this society against the gynocentric collective matriarchy, when MGTOW-led unions(Not Marxist, Feminist degenerate ones) start forming one day we are going to have all men strike and stop working. And bring down civilization or society as a whole for revenge of your exploitation of us. Women want men to do all the work anyway and don’t do anything so it will be quite easy.

MGTOWRevolutionary, We Hunted The Mammoth 21 Comments [3/18/2017 10:52:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 134195

Except for the fact that boys don’t experience ‘’some form of sexual abuse’’ ever, and all apparent ‘’cases’’ of male sexual abuse are always from people who lack any understanding of the definition of such terms.
Sexual abuse involves mental trauma, males do not experience mental trauma as they are incapable of doing so, similar to how males cannot experience emotions such as remorse and generosity and therefore the term sexual abuse does not apply to men, there should be another term that does apply to men but I have been unable to locate such a term.

comradejordan, Tumblr 10 Comments [11/14/2017 11:47:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 125954

Females don't have personalities

I know one femoid organism who has diagnosed autism and had literally no interests outside playing insipid Xanga games. Talks in a monotone, long awkward pauses where her brain seems to be on idle, etc.

She got married 3 years ago and just shat out her first runt (male, so likely a future spergcel).

This makes me fucking furious. Normshits are always saying to improve your personality - what bullshit! A female have the personality of a vegetable and still get laid, get married, have kids, etc.

As a matter of fact, most FHOs have only the most basic pumpkin spice latte of personalities. No deep interests, no passions, no unique take on life, no strong ambitions other than the most generic normie shit (money/house/kids/travel). They can still get a boyfriend at the drop of a hat.

This includes the "nerdy" "gamer girl" "feminist activist" "kinky" "polyamorous" pussy equipped redditwhores who post here. They dont have any original instrinsic personality, they have a bunch of cliques they identify with. No real depth, substance, originality or thought put into it.

Females are garbage.

EveryDayIsANightmare, /r/incels 12 Comments [4/2/2017 7:30:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125735

When artificial wombs are invented men won’t even have to do it, women will rope themselves as their sexual market value plus power that comes alongside it is completely destroyed.

W]hen [women] start to diminish men will most likely find it viable to cross the x-y line in order to flock to cute-boys to settle down with, and marry whom don’t have the hypergamous instinct of biological females.

As soon as [artificial wombs] are invented we don’t have to put up with the bullshit of women anymore, cute-boys are more feminine than western females and always eager to please/available for sex to a partner.

They are more of a woman than any western whore and at the same time if you pursue them now there is no trouble, and also no ridiculous laws on what rape is(Which is everything nowadays) protecting them.

Even if one marries a nice-guy he will only get used for his money, while she will continue to sleep around with the alpha male bad boys. The beta male nice guy will be forced to pour his resources into raising his child, which should be the responsibility of the other man and not him.

Women are biologically hypergamous, will always date and marry up, and even if in a relationship, a woman will immediately leave the man for a higher guy if she thinks she can land him.

Women also sexually desire men who have a violent criminal record(Especially murder/assault/robbery/drugs/gangs being the top most “hot”) and wear tattoos/piercings on them. The jerks and badboys half of which being criminals, sometimes fresh out of prison/jail or bullies in school are straightforward about their sexual intentions; and masculine enough to press for it.

DownWithWomen, We Hunted The mammoth 21 Comments [3/25/2017 11:17:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 128785

[Source NSFW]

How to cure feminism.
1. Tell her to shut up
2. If she does not shut up, slap her across the face
3. If she still doesn’t shut you, you didn’t hit her hard enough. Try again
4. Grab her hair and drag her around a bit
5. Don’t be scared of hurting her (she is a strong independent woman)
6. Always degrade her and make her feel less by calling her stupid, dumb, dumbass, or cutting her off by saying shut up.
7. It’s not hard to debunk a feminist nowadays, after debunking all her points again remind her how stupid she is.
8. When she tells you the things she can’t do always say it’s because you’re a woman.
9. Tell her she is stupid a few more times
10. Slap her or spank her. (Feminists only act up cause they haven’t been put in their place.)
11. Always have aggressive sex with her. Never show any mercy.
12. Tell her she needs to be slapped and abused. It’s good for a woman.

feministdestruction, Tumblr 17 Comments [7/3/2017 1:38:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 135892

Adding to my previous post, if someone did “molest” my child who was under 7, I would not get too mad about it

Chinzork, The World's Most Taboo-Breaking Anti-Feminist Blog 8 Comments [1/11/2018 12:26:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: X

Quote# 135917

Female genital mutilation should be advocated in the West

Women need to get rid of their sexual impulses in order to become more responsive for child caring and household activities. Sexual deviance just destruct society we need to be more open about old fashion methods to bring the society back to a more civilized manner where bestiality and sex is controlled.

Homosapicuckus, 12 Comments [1/12/2018 11:27:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 136667

Your Life – As Nature Intended

Are you?

Tired of meeting dis-respectful, rude and brat-like women?
Feel as if you belong in a previous era – like the 1950s?
Know you’re a good man at heart, but feel like the world’s gone crazy around you?
Feel as if the experience of wearing the pants in a relationship has somehow passed you by?

Sure, I felt that way too.

Until I manned up and taught myself the life skills that enabled me to:

Walk my household like a man and stuff my cock down my woman’s throat at any time I please
Be bought constant supplies of baked goods and nourishing dishes
Fuck my woman like a sexual object at any time I please, in any way I please
Have sex so intensely mind-blowing my vision blurs when I reach orgasm
Put my woman over my knee whenever I see rude or impolite behaviour
Have my woman thank me for spanking her and beg to suck my cock afterwards
Lead my relationship and set mutual goals – like a good-hearted, caring and traditional husband

I wrote this book to help the everyday man with his biggest dilemma: brainwashed women who believe in equal relationships and feminism.

What you will learn:

How to use Sexual Normalization to bring you and your woman back to your inner monkey natures
Exact techniques on how to use Forced Cock Worship to create an emotional bond of intimacy more powerful than any other
Detailed instructions for how to Verbally Reprogram your woman into agreeing to a submissive relationship role
What your woman really wants from your Leadership, but can’t put into words
Penile strength training secrets to get erections bigger and harder than you thought possible
Vaginal strength training secrets that will literally change your life
Exact methods of how to dictate your woman’s vaginal training regime
How to have the true mindset of a traditional male head of household
How to dispense discipline like a secure traditional husband and not a insecure, domineering asshole.

And the Bonus Program:

“Sassy to Submissive in 6 Weeks” – exact instructions on how to have your new girlfriend Intellectualize and Rationalize a submissive relationship role and then sign a Relationship Contract


Relationship Contract Template – for a Modern Male-Led Relationship®


The techniques and methods in this book are extremely psychologically powerful! When you play with fire, be careful not to get burned. Use at your own risk!

$19.99 $9.89

Rodney Hand, The Head of Household 14 Comments [2/15/2018 2:09:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 141477

Men with anime women as avatars should be put on a list by the government and then the government should come to their houses and order them to 'come with us to answer some questions it will only take twenty minutes' and then instead of taking them somewhere to ask them some questions they put them on a train to a black site facility in Ohio and direct them into small hermetically sealed rooms and mass murder them with poison gas and I don't particularly care if the gas is all that poisonous they could use carbon monoxide or chloramine or even just wood smoke I don't even give a shit as long as the job gets done because men with anime women as avatars aren't really even men anymore and the world would be better off without them in it.

Dynastia, Kiwi Farms 21 Comments [12/7/2018 11:45:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 135887

If a female is younger than 8, and you want to fuck her, then you must have the permission of the male authority who owns her: a father, a husband, or another male relative. If for some reason no man owns her, perhaps because she’s an orphan or whatever, then you can rape her at will.

If a woman is 8 or older, and you want to fuck her, then either she is married and you have to ask permission to fuck her from her husband (and why would you? men don’t usually agree to becoming cuckolds), or she is not married, meaning she is under no one’s authority, being no one’s property — because the hitherto recognized authority of fathers or other male relatives no longer applies after reaching that age — and, therefore, she is “fair game” and you can fuck her at will.

An 8-year-old woman ceases to be the property of her blood family; she can only belong to a husband. Otherwise, if there’s no husband to own her, she doesn’t legally belong to anyone – RAPE HER ALL YOU LIKE.

THE DAILY ANTIFEMINIST, The World's Most Taboo-Breaking Anti-Feminist Blog 12 Comments [1/12/2018 11:20:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: X

Quote# 135022

It should be mandatory for all femoids over eighteen to preserve their anal virginity, in which, all Incels would get the chance to deflower at least one cum dumpsters anal virginity. It does not matter in anyway even if these bitches are either in a relationship or married to someone, they should strictly preserve their anal virginity for Incels at whatever cost. If in someway, a bitch is to disregard this and do as she pleases, she will be lashed harshly multiple times only to be gangraped for not complying.

Lookismisreal, 11 Comments [12/10/2017 4:06:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Antiincel

Quote# 123947

(What makes you call [a classmate he fancies] a "whore"?)

its became a synonym with women for me at this point, not a particular reason really.

throwaway680603, /r/incels 22 Comments [1/26/2017 1:46:41 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126968

All bisexual women are potential rapists.

RetroSpriteResources, Deviantart forums 4 Comments [5/8/2017 1:39:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

"Sick Fetish" Award

What the hell is wrong with you?!

Quote# 127083

[Anorexic] girls are hot...Dying young is the best part because they're disposable. Who wants an old hag anyway?

RetroSpriteResources, Deviantart forums 15 Comments [5/12/2017 12:01:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 123076

[OP of "You all are proof of evil female nature and all of you deserve to get raped by me"]

Your efforts to belittle our suffering and mocking us will not go unpunished. Females being alone and not being able to get chad is not comparable to real inceldom. Making fun of our ideology/philosophy and comparing your chad craving to our incel suffering in an effort to belittle inceldom is truly evil. It is a crime that can not be forgiven. All of you evil whores deserve to get raped and destroyed by me. Inceldom is a serious condition exclusive to men that needs to be resolved as soon as possible. It needs to be taken seriously and not get mocked or belittled. Even the claim that females can be incel belittles inceldom. Females claiming to be incel is an insult to real incels and the suffering they have to endure. Inceldom is serious. It is not a laughing matter. Inceldom kills, killed and will kill again. You, whores, are truly evil and disgusting. If you really claim to be incel then there would be no problem if I raped all of you fatass whores. That is what you disgusting slobs deserve. All of you are evil. Evil needs to be hated and destroyed. All of you deserve getting raped then shot by me. What you people do right now is a crime against inceldom and incels. This subreddit is a travesty and an abomination. I hate each and every single one of you with the very core of my being.

SaintElliot, Reddit - r/FemaleIncels 36 Comments [12/17/2016 3:18:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 132938

[OP of "Breast cancer is on our side"]

Femoids love wearing provocative clothes that not only push their breasts out, but also reveal a lot of their breast area. Yet, when someone, especially men, stare at those two objects these cunts get triggered and call them perverts and scream how men are viewing them as sex objects, even though these cum dumpsters are willingly showing their boobs to the whole world to see.

Which is why I'm always glad to see or hear a cuntrag who has gotten breast cancer and suffer from it. What's more amusing is that, seeing ones who have gotten their breasts removed. The beef curtains, for the most part, lose their feminity and identity when it happens. Seeing a bitch with breast cancer is best thing ever to witness because it is the punishment for their sins.

Lookismisreall, Reddit - r/Incels 12 Comments [10/13/2017 11:34:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 127777

A Canadian airline pilot said that she was shocked after receiving a recent note that cited the Bible as a reason flying airplanes were “no place for a woman.”

WestJet pilot Carey Steacy told CTV that crews were cleaning the aircraft after a flight from Calgary to Victoria on Sunday, and they found the note from a passenger named “David” written on a napkin.

“The cockpit of an airliner is no place for a woman,” the note said. “A woman being a mother is the most honour, not as ‘captain.’”

“PS I wish Westjet [sic] could tell me a fair lady is at the helm so I can book another flight,” he continued, observing that his views were “not PC.”

“It made me feel sad. It was just surprising,” Steacy recalled. “I can’t believe that there’s people that still think that way.”

In a post on Facebook, Steacy wrote that the passenger had been “welcome to deplane when you heard I was a ‘fair lady.’ You have that right. Funny, we all, us humans, have the same rights in this great free country of ours. ”

The WestJet passenger’s note also pointed to a Bible verse, Proverbs 31, which many Christians believe defines the “perfect” woman as a wife who works in the home.

"David", Raw Story 16 Comments [6/2/2017 11:02:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 127783

In 2006, a 13-year-old girl named Carra Crouch spent a night in a hotel room with a 30-year-old man. They drank some alcohol and watched a movie. He also, she later testified, spiked her water and raped her after she passed out.

She wasn’t sure what to do, so she went to her grandmother and explained everything. And her grandmother did absolutely nothing about it… unless you count yelling at Carra. There was no phone call to cops, at least.

The reason all of this is big news right now is because the grandmother is Jan Crouch, the now-deceased woman who founded Trinity Broadcasting Network with her husband Paul Crouch.

The man who allegedly raped Carra was “a TBN employee at a Praise-A-Thon fundraiser in Atlanta.” And Carra has filed a personal injury lawsuit against the Trinity Christian Center (which runs TBN) saying her grandmother’s negligence caused her trauma and emotional distress. The trial just concluded yesterday.

The lawyer for Trinity says Jan Crouch was under no obligation to report anything to authorities because she was simply being a grandmother. She was off the clock. Carra didn’t come to her as a minister (which she was), making her legally obligated to report such a crime.

What really gets me is the reason Jan Crouch didn’t say anything, according to Carra’s lawyer.

"In Wednesday’s closing arguments, Carra Crouch’s attorney, David Keesling, said Jan Crouch, who died in May 2016, never reported the incident because she was more concerned about the 'bad press.'

'Jan Crouch, like her or not, her words mattered to Carra,' [Keesling] said. 'Carra went in fragile and she came out broken.'"

Now it’s up to a jury to decide whether Jan Crouch broke the law by disregarding what Carra told her.

Jan Crouch, Patheos 8 Comments [6/3/2017 1:46:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 141283

In typical dishonest fashion, Wikipedia records the 2012 rape incident in Delhi, India, but totally ignores the fact that the 23-year-old attacked woman was dressed in pants, which goes against India's traditional culture. American men are wimps, who dare not criticize women who wear pants, lest they be degraded and labeled by feminists as a male chauvinist pig and old-fashioned bigot. I'm proud to be labeled as such if preaching Biblical standards of decency, modesty and feminine attire make it so. I'm proud to stand for modesty and proper clothing on women. Pants are always improper on women, even so-called “dress-pants.” The image of the liberated American woman is shameful, wicked and pathetic. Feminists are rebels. Our churches are filled with henpecked pastors who are afraid to preach the truth that women ought not wear pants.

Victim's Mother Admits Feminist Influence On Daughter

The mother of the raped woman foolishly said...

“As her confidence grew, the once-shy Jyoti swapped her traditional dresses for jeans, tops, and high-heels. By virtue of her education, she also become the second “head of the family” alongside her father.”

SOURCE: Delhi gang rape victim's mother speaks, The Sydney Morning Herald

The fact that the mother boasts of her Americanized daughter elevating herself to the “head of the family” evidences the influence of the satanic American feminist agenda on the family. Anything with two heads is a monstrosity! Again, I am not justifying nor defending the brutal attack, rape and beating of the young couple, but the fact that one of the men who raped her is attributing the crimes to the sensual way she was dressed speaks volumes!!! Millions of women all across India are outraged and angry over the rapist's comments, but he is telling the truth, like it or not...

“a girl is far more responsible for rape than a boy,” he was repeating something community and religious leaders in this nation of 1.2 billion routinely say.

“A decent girl won't roam around at 9 o'clock at night. ... Housework and housekeeping is for girls, not roaming in discos and bars at night doing wrong things, wearing wrong clothes,” Mukesh Singh said in the documentary, “India's Daughter,” meant to be shown on Sunday, International Women's Day, in India and several other countries.

READ MORE: Blaming women for rape a widespread issue in India; © 2015, The Associated Press

It is a shame that a thug rapist tells the truth, while most women are in denial. It is true that a decent girl won't roam around at night in the bars and discos. Frankly, the raped woman's mother is a fool in her thinking, and so is her daughter (who is now dead). I'm sad that she was attacked and is dead. What upsets me is that women all across India are now demanding that men be indoctrinated to think that women can be sluts, dress like whores and live ungodly, and the men had better get used to it and leave the wicked women alone. My friend, it simply does not work that way.

David J. Stewart, Divided by Truth 13 Comments [11/13/2018 5:16:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 123434

Attributes that will not help you get laid even one iota

Instead of just summarizing with, "everything but looks and money," I figured I'd list some things and explain how worthless they are when it comes to attracting women.

SENSE OF HUMOR: Women are not attracted to funny. In fact, a sense of humor can actually work against you, as women think of relationships as serious business. Sure, she'll tease Chad and laugh at random shit while she's with him, but it won't be because he's funny. It'll be an instinctive reaction because she finds him attractive. I can make just about any woman laugh with my dry humor. They go, "that little boy is so funnyyyyy. So anyway, Ashley, Chad is picking me up tonight."

Bill Burr: "I was never making enough money. There's something weird about being a stand-up comedian where for the most part you don't have groupies. You still have to work for it. I also think different emotions that, say, singers can bring out in women makes them kind of swoon. Nobody swoons over a comedian."

BEING A MUSICIAN: While Burr was correct about women not being attracted to comedians, he is wrong about women being into musicians solely for the sake of them being musicians. You see, women are into musicians either because they are physically attractive, or because they are rich and famous. A musician who is not rich and famous will not attract a single chick with his music.

My brother is an aspiring musician. He has played tons of shit, including overseas in front of crowds of around 1,000 people. You know how many women have hit on him after shows over the years? You can count it on...NO hands.

He has had a few girlfriends, but not one of them had any idea what it was he did. He met his current girlfriend at a bar, just getting a beer.

You see, when you're 5'5" like my brother, women don't care what kind of guitar player you are.

Women love mediocre talents who are in boy bands a helluva lot more than they love far more talented artists who aren't as popular. The guys in the boy bands are sooooo yummy and so rich and famous.

INTELLIGENCE: Yeah, she's really impressed by your brain. Albert Einstein's picture is on her ceiling and she fingers herself to it.

There are two ways women think of intelligence:

Academic achievements. My Dad has a PhD, so my mom loves to say that this was why she was so attracted to him. But really, what is there about his PhD - which is in the science field - that affects her in any way that isn't financial? My mom majored in linguistics and has no scientific inclination. She has discussed the technical parts of my dad's work with him about one time back in 1982, which was all it took for her to go, "uhhhh, OK, now I know not to bring that up again."

When the guy talks over her head, she thinks to herself, "I love it when he talks all smart and stuff. xD." She doesn't understand it, so this means it's intelligent, and she can brag to her friends about how her possibly pseudo-intellectual SO is sooooooo smart.

TALENT IN GENERAL: When I was a kid, I used to fantasize about "impressing" girls. What naive heterosexual boy doesn't?

The problem is, they're not impressed. They simply don't care. You're a great athlete? A great musician? A great painter? A great writer?

What interests her is in how much money you'll attain from this. She'll want to hitch her ride to a guy who is going places.

If she spots a young LeBron James in the gym, she might get excited about what the future could be like if she were with him and he became an NBA star. The talent itself being something she's attracted to? HA!

Even Roger Federer's wife, who was a fucking tennis player herself, frequently looks bored during his matches.

"Oh, he hit a winner from between his legs? Let's just finish this match, I want to go back to the hotel."

KINDNESS: They say it themselves. "Women are not objects you put kindness tokens into and get sex out of."

Nice guys are a dime a dozen. "You're sweet" is a patronizing remark and means she will never fuck you.

TimRattayGotScrewed, /r/incels 179 Comments [1/4/2017 7:29:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 134830

What ISN'T rape:

- If a female dresses like a whore, goes out with the intent of committing degeneracy and gets itself "raped" then it's not rape, it's just public property being utilised. No different from pissing in a urinal or putting something in a trash can.

- If a female is not a virgin, it's not rape. If a female has allowed itself to be defiled already then another defilement won't make any difference. If you consent to being defiled and used then you have no self respect and deserve non-consensual defilement too.

What IS rape:

- If a non-degenerate virgin woman is sitting at home in her parents' house, taking care of her little brother on a Friday night instead of being an alcoholic whore is a victim of a break in where the perpetrators see her and decide to rape her, taking away a part of her she was saving for her future husband and no one else, that is rape.

- If a woman is married and has only had intimate experiences with her husband. This is the only time it is permissible for a woman to be a non-virgin. If a man rapes her after this, he is guilty of rape, assault on the husband's property, theft (stealing her sexuality) and of a grave insult to the husband.

Situations like these are the only time rape is a bad thing and should result in grave consequences, such as execution, for the perpetrators.

SaintMarcLepine, 12 Comments [12/4/2017 2:26:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Antiincel

Quote# 110417

Sub-8 law

The sub-8 law refers to systematic legal oppression of non-attractive men (more specifically, men rated below 8 in attractiveness).

Sexual Harassment

Sexual harassment laws are so that women could have an unattractive man could be jailed for doing certain approaches that they would find charming if done by an attractive man. This makes it so that an entire class of behaviors that are perfectly acceptable for an attractive man, are unacceptable, even illegal, for an unattractive man.

Main article: Prostitution

It is illegal in the United States for a man to pay for a woman to have sex with him. In other words, a man who is not attractive enough to get a woman to have sex with him for free is legally obligated to remain incel. However, it is legal for a man to have sex with a woman as part of a porn film, and it is common for male strippers to get blowjobs from women while stripping. Contrary to popular belief, our society does not prohibit the commodization of sex - it is only when incel males are helped as a result that it becomes a problem.

The sub-8 law in effect in New York

Why would society actively work to keep incels incel? Because the more incels there are, the more sexual power women have.

Omegakv, Sluthate 31 Comments [7/4/2015 5:03:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 126846

[A promotion for a short-film the author made about an alternate US where a totalitarian theocracy takes over and prevents women from gaining the vote (the author intends this as utopian btw)]

Fellow ROK fans, tired of every new film having a militant feminist theme? Want to see a universe on video in which men create a paradise on earth with their wise rule, and insolent women causing trouble are given their just reward? My short film (18 minutes) is called Pax Masculina (Latin for Peace of Men) and is an alternate history science fiction movie.

It all started when I posed the question “What would the United States be like today if women had never received the right to vote?” Check out the two minute trailer below. I think you will love the PAX universe.


In Pax Masculina, a theocratic totalitarian regime takes over the United States in 1910. Under this government, women have few rights like in Old Testament or Victorian England culture. The suffragettes were defeated and women never got the vote.

Uninhibited by the influence of women, what follows is a century of peace and prosperity, known as the Pax Masculina. Out of disgruntled suffragettes evolved the Women’s Resistance Movement (WRM) which violently opposes the regime. The movie takes place in 2016 when the WRM has increased aggression in its opposition to the governing patriarchy in their fight for equality of the sexes.

The Women’s Resistance Movement uses assassinations and bombings to create terror and kill without mercy. Seduction and murder of policemen and government officials are common tactics. The government induces its own terror with televised torture and execution of captured women soldiers. The movie’s Facebook site gives more details and many behind-the-scenes photos from the film.

The following photos represent the philosophy of the regime:

The conflict between the regime and WRM is really a battle for the hearts and minds of young women who might join the WRM. When a girl turns 16, she is eligible to be married. Husbands pay the father a dowry and there is a transfer of property. There is an all-girls high school where harsh teachers use ruler and paddle freely to discipline unruly females.

Girls are forced to watch public hangings of captured WRM soldiers on classroom televisions. In the photographed scene below, one girl jokes around about the threat of hanging beside a victim she has just had to watch.


A symbol on the wall of all classrooms remind them of the consequences of having a bad attitude. Gentlemen, how many times have you wanted to tell a woman to “lose the attitude”? In this universe, it is official policy!

The beautiful women of the WRM wear steampunk inspired uniforms designed for combat and seduction as they engage in hand-to-hand combat with police. Authorities have better weapons but hesitate to use them since they want to capture these arrogant women alive for public display.


Captured WRM soldiers are hanged publicly with a worldwide TV broadcast of the event as if it was the World Cup or Superbowl. There is no drop and a large diameter rope is used to haul them up into the air so they slowly strangle, preventing permanent damage to necks or windpipes. There is a good possibility that they will be half hanged (let down before dead) to be made a sex-slave to a deserving man. This discourages young women from joining the WRM while entertaining the populace.

As for the status of the film, the cut is finished and being submitted to film festivals. To stay up to date about its release, follow the Facebook page. The world premier of Pax Masculina will be at Comicpalooza in Houston May 12-14. The exact screening time and date will be posted on the aforementioned Facebook page.

I made this film to express my view and to share my artistic vision, not to make money. Eventually it will just be posted on YouTube or Vimeo to be viewed for free. But for now, festival rules prevent that to retain eligibility. My goal is to make a full length feature film which expands the story line of the PAX universe. But that is a year or two away. Now, I just want to share the vision with like-minded individuals such as ROK readers. I hope the trailer whets your appetite andI would love to hear feedback. My best estimate for release of the short film for public viewing is six months.

I admire Roosh more than I can say after having experienced similar harassment by the social justice warriors against me. Maybe he will agree to be a consultant on the feature film? I made this movie with a balanced perspective instead of the expected female empowerment manifesto. But the mere hint that a government which excludes women might be successful has led to an effort to silence my creative voice.

Instead of reasoned debate, some think I shouldn’t be permitted to express my artistic opinion. In addition, I have openly promoted the men’s right movement (posted links to ROK articles for example), and I have dared to say some positive things about President Trump. I have been vilified and my reputation decimated with lies.

Having practiced engineering for over 40 years, I am used to dealing with truth and facts. I have learned that the artistic community is in general close-minded and truth means nothing to them. I am astonished at their ability to lie without hesitation, without guilt, without apology. Some “artists” show a total lack of character and honor. Any deviation from political correctness is not tolerated. That will be the focus of a future post. For now, I plan to continue to make movies that tell the truth and present an alternative viewpoint.

Pax Masculina, Return of Kings 34 Comments [5/3/2017 4:52:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 125256

You pointed out an intersting poin that actually does not exist: my fault, sorry.
I forgot to point that Saudi Arabia has an huge problem with spinsterhood. So, saudi men have already the chaches to get women.
In my opinion is a law manufactured just against men like me, who decide to live their life following a law that is noth the one of their contries, to make impossible for us to get decent women even if we move there.
In other countries like Pakistan, where men are weakened by western propaganda through satanic sluts like Malala, the feminists managed to pass the very same law of the west, like aoc at 16.
Since in Saudi Arabia it is not possible because local men would rise up, alhamdulillah!!!, they managed at least to ruin the lives of oppressed desperate western men who were getting ready to move.
It's the war on western men.

Anonymous, Eivind Berge's Blog 11 Comments [3/9/2017 3:19:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: dd

Quote# 116472

Most people think ow if I can become an Alpha male, women will like me and want to sleep with me (often not even sleep with you most the time men are just looking for female approval). The truth is women will want to sleep with you more, Hypergamy is women’s natural state, meaning that they are always looking to mate with the Alpha male.

Hypergamy (colloquially referred to as “marrying up”) is the act or practice of seeking a spouse of higher looks, socioeconomic, caste or status than oneself. The term is often used more specifically in reference to a perceived tendency among human cultures for females to seek or be encouraged to pursue male suitors that are higher status than themselves

The problem with this line of thinking is it’s in itself very beta and weak. Wanting to become all Alpha for someone else approval, it’s very externally referenced. The attraction from women is a byproduct. You should want to ‘become a alpha’ for yourself, for the piece of mind, for the ability to enjoy your life and to have power in the world

Makeshift Alpha, Journey from Beta to Alpha Male 17 Comments [2/1/2016 5:03:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Xadoy

Quote# 118973

There are very solid rational, Constitutional, and historical reasons for denying female suffrage. John Adams summarized them best in his famous written exchange with his wife:

"I long to hear that you have declared an independency. And, by the way, in the new code of laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make, I desire you would remember the ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors.

"Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands.

"Remember, all men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation."
- Abigail Adams, 31 March 1776

"Depend upon it, we know better than to repeal our masculine systems. Although they are in full force, you know they are little more than theory. We dare not exert our power in its full latitude. We are obliged to go fair and softly, and, in practice, you know we are the subjects.

"We have only the name of masters, and rather than give up this, which would completely subject us to the despotism of the petticoat, I hope General Washington and all our brave heroes would fight."
- John Adams, 14 April 1776

Events have proven John Adams correct. Free men are accustomed to voluntarily limiting the use of their power and not pushing it to the full extent of its capabilities. Women, to say the least, are not. Just as an angry woman does not pull her punches, women in politics do not restrain their instincts to attempt to control the uncontrollable. Abigail Adams is projecting: she wrongly assumes all men would be tyrants if they could because she knows that is true of herself and other women. And women do not hold themselves bound by laws in any case, regardless of whether they have had voice or representation or not. They are bound by fear.

This is why a nation that wishes to remain wealthy and free does not permit female involvement in its governance, and why totalitarians from the Italian Fascists to the Soviet Bolsheviks have historically made a priority of female involvement in the political process.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 23 Comments [5/15/2016 5:09:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: David

Quote# 111391

Good point, western women don't deserve to live in Asia, because that is the place where MEN rule things. Let them go back to their feminist wasteland America and rot there. Let us western men who are happy living in Asia live and let be.

We western men should actually endevour to treat western women like shit when we see them in Asia. Do anything you can to make them feel unwelcome, treat them like total crap. Best method is to walk around with a hot young asian girl on your arm, and when the western girls see that, they f***ing freak out big time. It's like a huge slap in their face.

Boycott american women, Happier Abroad 30 Comments [8/2/2015 4:34:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 134893

Here's my proposal:
If a female has fucked at least 2 guys while not being married, or fucked one guy at least 5 times while not being married to him, she is officially declared a slut. Her photo, name and address get put on a public website for everyone to see. Every female on this website can be legally raped without facing any consequences. They fuck random people on regular, so where's the harm when an incel gets his share too?

How such a scenario would play out:
A female meets a Chad at a bar, she goes to his home for a one night stand. The next morning she leaves, but is spotted by an incel. "Hey, didn't I see this female on the slut website?", the incel thinks, and takes a photo of her for his face recognition app. The app finds her profile on that website and confirms she is indeed rapeable. The incel goes on to have sex with her. The female is not very pleased because she didn't plan on having sex with anyone else but Chad that day, but she accepts that this is only fair. At the end of the day both the Chad and the incel got the same amount of sex, instead of Chad getting 100% while the incel gets 0%.

This is ultimate justice. Instead of Chads having all the sex while normies get the leftovers and incels are left with nothing, everybody would get an equal share of it. This would lead to less crimes, less depression and less suicides.

There's a problem with disabled people who can't overpower a female, for example people who can't walk and are on a wheelchair. We don't want to leave these people out, so there should be volunteers who help them and subdue the female for them.

This way everyone gets sex. Not just a special group of people, everyone. This is equality, this is justice.

Kirby, 12 Comments [12/6/2017 2:12:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Antiincel

Quote# 136613

The purpose blog of this is to document the growing epidemic of adultophiles who rape and murder. Over 80% of serial killers are sexually attracted to adults, while only a very small percentage (less than 5%) target children . Most pedophiles are harmless despite all the fear-mongering in the mainstream media which focuses on child victims but rarely reports cases of adults who rape other adults.

When I say adultophile I’m exclusively referring to adults who are sexually attracted to other adults, not minors who are sexually attracted to adults. The latter is, in my opinion, currently more natural and healthy.

therealperverts, ADULTOPHILIA IS A MENTAL DISORDER… 8 Comments [2/18/2018 11:18:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: X

Quote# 50821

*Cannabis abuser 'snapped his 16-month-old daughter's back in two'*

I don't know. I've lost all my sympathy for cunts, even little ones. Had she survived she would have hated men all her life.

I'm also wondering about the alleged "facts" of the case. The fellow is said to be "cannabis user" which tends to make people more mellow. I'm wondering if the abusive mother wasn't actually the guilty party in most of the injuries to the child.

bobx23456, MRO 28 Comments [10/31/2008 1:45:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 124375

All marriages should be arranged

Sluts are too stupid to choose a partner for themselves.

Incel4Life, /r/incels 30 Comments [2/9/2017 12:54:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125420

How can you not hate women?


I hate them.

Their stupid fucking smiles. Women smile more because they live life on easy mode. They have no reason to be unhappy.

All they have to do is walk into a room and all the attention is on them. People will cater to their every whim just because they were born with a vagina.

Meanwhile, I'm bullied all throughout school. I'm treated like scum. Insulted by everyone. The only times people have called me attractive were when they were saying it sarcastically. That hurts more than just being called ugly.

They contribute nothing to conversation. They think they can say any useless thing, and the sad reality is they can, because idiot men will eat it up. "Oh my god, you're right. The sky is blue! I've never looked at it like that before."

They don't have to try. They don't have to do anything. And people will love them