[A gay man states he would like to have children]
Terrible idea. If you want to be homosexual then you need to face facts: Two women or two men cannot procreate! Having sex with anyone just to have a baby to satisfy your own selfishness is disgusting. It should be illegal. Children need to grow up in a house with a mom and dad that are in a stable, loving marriage together.
45 comments
You're missing the fucking point.
Having sex with anyone just to have a baby to satisfy your own selfishness is disgusting. It should be illegal.
Looking at this cynically, the desire to have a baby can be considered pure self-interest.
What about the children living in a unstable household, where mom and dad don't love one another? In your warped mind, is that still better than two parents of the same sex loving their child in a supportive, stable enviroment?
that are in a stable, loving marriage together.
Then just give them the right to marry. Problem solved.
Terrible idea.
Not according to the various studies that have been done.
If you want to be homosexual then you need to face facts: Two women or two men cannot procreate!
No shit, Sherlock.
Having sex with anyone just to have a baby to satisfy your own selfishness is disgusting.
There's at least one other option available to procreate without actually having sex you know. Given the hypothetical situation stated in the question I would guess that would be the approach taken.
It should be illegal.
Unfortunately for you, you don't get to decide such things.
Children need to grow up in a house with a mom and dad that are in a stable, loving marriage together.
Children need at least one responsible adult to provide a caring, supportive and nurturing environment for them. Whether or not the adult is the biological parent, adoptive parent or simply a guardian doesn't matter. The whole "mom and dad" bit is just the norm; there is no indication that having both a mother and a father rather than two mothers or two fathers is any better for the child as far as I'm aware. Marriage also is entirely optional as being married does not automatically ensure a stable relationship with which to raise a child.
"Children need to grow up in a house with a mom and dad that are in a stable, loving marriage together."
Well that would reduce the birth rate some....
Okay, I don't even GET this one, there's too much... wrong in it. It sounds like he just took the classic "having sex to satisfy your own selfishness is disgusting" line and inserted "just to have a baby" in there so that it would actually fit what the guy was saying.
Also, how do you even illegalize something like that?
Non-contradiction award?. So, two women fucking don't procreate but, since they're not sterile, there is no problem, bearing in mind that they can get insemminated and so on. Again, thanks for debunking the argument to regulate adoption, foster care, or just the traditional form of "marriage", you know?, arranged marriages and that story that Abraham had with Aggar.
So, no widowhood, no single parents, no people who are married for convenience(let alone how you're going to regulate what a stable, loving marriage is)
Children need to grow up in a house with a mom and dad that are in a stable, loving marriage together."
And marrying a woman guarantees that?
Children need to grow up in a house with a mom and dad that are in a stable, loving marriage together.
Up until about a century ago, many if not most kids lost one or both parents to early death. Throughout most of the "good old days" kids grew up with one parent, perhaps a step-parent, or were farmed out to relatives.
"If you want to be homosexual..."
Okay, stop right there. There is no question of "wanting" to be homosexual, any more than there is a question of "wanting" to be Caucasian. Either you're gay, or you're straight, or you're bisexual at some point along a continuum between the two -- but whatever it is, it's what you ARE, not what you "want" to be. You can decide your sexual behavior, but you can't decide your sexuality any more than you can decide the size of your pituitary gland.
~David D.G.
Wow. Just wow. Not everyone believes in a mother, father and 2.5 kids. I would rather be in a stable home with one parent (or- Oh noes!- a home with a loving same sex couple) than a "tradional" family that is dysfunctional. What is it you said about illegal? Stupidity such as yours should be outlawed. And by the way...I don't necessarily believe that people need to be married to have children and a stable family. Things like that take work adn commitment, not a piece of paper.
do you know, that two male or female birds, can raise a chick better then a male and a female? no, you dont, because you dont know jack shit do ya? get ya damned facts right.
"Two women or two men cannot procreate!"
Neither can two infertels or two old people.
"Having sex with anyone just to have a baby to satisfy your own selfishness is disgusting."
I thought having as many babies as one can was fine with fundies.
"Children need to grow up in a house with a mom and dad"
Lets take away kids from all the single parents then.
"that are in a stable, loving marriage together."
Who says two same sex people cannot provide a stable home with a loving marriage?
And what about divorced parents?
"Children need to grow up in a house with a mom and dad that are in a stable, loving marriage together."
I have a friend whom's parents are divorced, and she's a lovely, perfectly normal girl. Fail.
So, no kid has ever lived through a divorce? That's news to me.
Children will be fine, as long as there are sound people of both genders in their surroundings. They don't need a mother AND a father, as long as they have uncles and aunts in abundance. As long as the kid is LOVED by its family, it will be well.
Terrible idea. If you want to be homosexual then you need to face facts: Two women or two men cannot procreate!
Wow. How profound. Now if only there were ways to get around this. Like putting your semen into a woman without intercourse, or...or...a house...a house full of children without mothers or fathers...some day, though, this insurmountable hurdle will be cleared, though...
Having sex with anyone just to have a baby to satisfy your own selfishness is disgusting.
Gonna tell that to the women who sabotage contraceptive efforts to trap a man into knocking her up, "just to have a family/baby?" Or is that just the case when homosexuals want a family?
It should be illegal. Children need to grow up in a house with a mom and dad that are in a stable, loving marriage together.
Because all you need to have a loving relationship is a parent with a penis, and one with a vagina. And if you lack one, the relationship is doomed from the start. And that is not a GROSS oversimplification of relationships, now is it?
Having sex with anyone just to have a baby to satisfy your own selfishness is disgusting. It should be illegal.
Uh, isn't that fundies' whole concept of marriage?
"Two women or two men cannot procreate!"
Two 13 year olds can. I'm guessing two adult people who make the decision to have kids, will be the better parents.
"Having sex with anyone just to have a baby to satisfy your own selfishness is disgusting."
Their are very few unselfish reasons to have kids.
"Children need to grow up in a house with a mom and dad that are in a stable, loving marriage together."
Sure, good luck finding them.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.