Jason #fundie

Jason #fundie theologyweb.com

What do the other human persons here think ?

No doubt someone will object, saying something obviously ridiculous like, but atheists are persons.

But clearly this is mistaken because anybody without a well developed belief in God is obviously not a full human person.

What could be more obvious than that ?

How many full human persons do you know without a well developed belief in God. Obviously none, because if they were full human person they would have a well developed belief in God.

Now some people might object to killing atheists for there (and obviously it is there and not thier as they are not whos but whats ) organs but think of all the full human persons that would benifit from the organs and the medical research that could be done on these non-persons.

How could anybody object, they are not human persons and if you think we should not kill them then that is just because of out dated ideas and because they must really just want people to suffer. For shame on you !

So what do people think ?

Should we kill these atheist human non-persons for the benifit of fully human persons ?

Jason

215 comments

old comment by Twist Kick

What do the other human persons here think ?
No doubt someone will object, saying something obviously ridiculous like, but fundies are persons. But clearly this is mistaken because anybody with such insane,overzealous stupidity and hatred is obviously not a full human person. What could be more obvious than that ? How many full human persons do you know with such insane,overzealous stupidity and hatred. Obviously none, because if they were full human person they would not be so overzealous in their hatred or insane in their stupidity. Now some people might object to killing fundies for there (and obviously it is there and not thier as they are not whos but whats ) organs but think of all the full human persons that would benifit from the organs and the medical research that could be done on these non-persons. How could anybody object, they are not human persons and if you think we should not kill them then that is just because of out dated ideas and because they must really just want people to suffer. For shame on you ! So what do people think ? Should we kill these fundie human non-persons for the benifit of fully human persons ? Fixed it.

old comment by shagggy37

I don't know if JASON will see this.

But, I have a few questions for him.

1st - Shouldn't GOD decide who should die? Why would you do it? I know it's wrong to kill other people, I remember because thou shall not kill.

2nd - Why would you want to transplant organs from people who you believe to be bad into people who you believe to be good? Wouldn't the transplanted organ corrupt, your definition of, a good person? I've heard that some people who haven gotten transplants will feel differently. One thing that happens a lot is that the person who gets the organ will like foods they did not like before. Then when they meet the family of the donor, they find out that it was the donor's favorite type of food.

These are just a few things to think about. I seriously, can't see someone wanting to hurt other people, and hope that you really did not mean what you wrote.

old comment by

What gives you the bloody right to say that someone isn't human because they don't believe in a higher power? Why should someone be killed because faith has failed them?

You are an IDIOT! A complete idiot.

Also, you are a fucking hypocrite. It was the Christian's so-called god that gave his people the Ten Commandments, and one of those commandments was "Thou shalt not kill." Read your Bible lately, shit head?

I am not less of a person because I don't believe in "God." In fact, I'm practicing my right to choose what I believe in. MY HUMAN RIGHT!

You know, I have deep admiration for people who believe in a higher power. I don't want to kill them because they believe and I don't view them as less human for relying on Divinity.

So, get off your high-holy, hypocritical pulpit and wake up to the twenty-first century, mother fucker.

Fanatic Fascists like you make me sick.

old comment by Burn The Priest

I think people who are developed a belief in "god" are the "human non-persons" for they have the belief that there is some greater power showing them a way.

This false belief is because they are not developed enough to "stand on their own feet" but they need something to give them salvation of this cruel and miserable thing called REAL LIFE

So "god" is for those who can't handle life themselves. What should we do with this weak scum? we should burn them at stake in public places for being too weak to survive in life. So the people that are strong enough to survive without "god" could have more space to live, this would solve the problem of increasing population.

old comment by

"No doubt someone will object, saying something obviously ridiculous like, but atheists are persons."

Which is true.

"But clearly this is mistaken because anybody without a well developed belief in God is obviously not a full human person."

Only if you're an elitist cunt...such as yourself.

"What could be more obvious than that ?"

What you just said isn't obvious, it was retarded.

"How many full human persons do you know without a well developed belief in God. Obviously none, because if they were full human person they would have a well developed belief in God."

Or maybe you could start talking to some atheists and realize that your prejudice against them might not be warrented as most of them prove to be good people.

"Now some people might object to killing atheists for there (and obviously it is there and not thier as they are not whos but whats ) organs but think of all the full human persons that would benifit from the organs and the medical research that could be done on these non-persons."

This guy is turning into Dr. Mengela pretty fucking fast. Atheists aren't good enough for society, but they're good enough for medical purposes!

"How could anybody object, they are not human persons and if you think we should not kill them then that is just because of out dated ideas and because they must really just want people to suffer. For shame on you !"

Well they could object on the grounds that its sick and wrong. They could object on the grounds that you're full of shit and would be committing murder. They could object because you're obviously delusional and these are the thoughts of a deranged mind.

"So what do people think ?

Should we kill these atheist human non-persons for the benifit of fully human persons ?"

No, you psychotic fuck.

old comment by Feminazi

What do the other human persons here think ?

No doubt someone will object, saying something obviously ridiculous like, but niggers are persons.

But clearly this is mistaken because anybody who was born black is obviously not a full human person.

What could be more obvious than that ?

How many full human persons do you know that are niggers? Obviously none, because if they were full human person they would not be niggers.

Now some people might object to killing niggers for there (and obviously it is there and not thier as they are not whos but whats ) organs but think of all the full human persons that would benifit from the organs and the medical research that could be done on these non-persons.

So what do people think ?

Should we kill these nigger human 3/4 persons for the benifit of fully human persons ?

Funny how a small tweak can change the whole post.

old comment by Michael

Displaying the ability to think is the fastest way to excommunication.

==================================================

Why God never received tenure at any university...

He had only one major publication, it was in Hebrew and it had no references.
It wasn't published in a referred journal, some even doubting he wrote it himself.

It may be true that he created the world, but what has he done since then?
His cooperative efforts have been quite limited and the scientific community has had a hard time replicating his results.

He never applied to the Ethics Board for permission to use human subjects and when one experiment went awry he tried to cover it up by drowning the subjects.

When subjects didn't behave as predicted, he deleted them from the sample.

He rarely came to class, just told students to read the Book and some say he even had his son teach the class.

He expelled his first two students for learning.

Although there are only ten requirements, most students fail his tests while continuing to lecture others on following them.

His office hours were infrequent and usually held in private on a mountaintop, using a middle-man who misquoted what was said.

old comment by rotfl

What do the other human persons here think ?

No doubt someone will object, saying something obviously ridiculous like, but Jasons are persons.

But clearly this is mistaken because anybody without a well developed rational thought is obviously not a full human person.

What could be more obvious than that ?

How many full human persons do you know without a well developed rational thought. Obviously none, because if they were full human person they would have a well developed rational thought.

Now some people might object to killing Jasons for there (and obviously it is there and not thier as they are not whos but whats ) organs but think of all the full human persons that would benifit from the organs and the medical research that could be done on these non-persons.

So what do people think ?

Should we kill these Jason human non-persons for the benifit of fully human persons ?

old comment by Anon

Sure, another completely weird comment from a mad fundie,

but because of its outrageousness, it gives an interesting insight into the ethics and morality of religions.

Religion isn't about "universal morality". They only pretend so. Religion is mainly about two different sets of ethics: One for people inside the club, and one for people outside the club. All of the major religions make a strict distinction between 'Insiders' and 'Outsiders'.

And thats what makes religion so inherently dangerous: As of the religious ideology, the members of the club are of course on "goodness' side" (saved, enlightened, etc.), and everybody outside is "on evil's side" (lost, unenlightened, etc.).

This dangerous feature of all these ideological systems can very quickly lead someone to dangerous conclusions like our fundie elaborated in his crazy statement.

Jason #fundie theologyweb.com

215 comments

Confused?