LazyJones:
I think they are losing also the battle on "mutations do not increase information". Argument of "there is no benefical mutations" has gone out the window long time ago.
What they are saying now is basicly "mutations and natural selection occur because that is the way God designed it". Quote from the same article:
"Adaptive mutations can readily fit within a creation model where adaptive mechanisms are a designed feature of bacteria."
Sounds like a case of post-hoc reasoning to me. What gets me is if one accepts that as true, then what in hell would not fit into the creation model?
Jesus! Fight like hell against science when it contradicts "sacred scripture", then when you start losing the battle to such an extent that it becomes obvious, pretend that your side has predicted that particular argument all along?
Holy Shit on a *** stick! So that's how those bastards rewrite history! Little subtle things like this. You know, I think we should bookmark this post of hers and save it for posterity. If possible, we should save the comments that AIG made where they railed against "adaptation" and "natural selection" since it sounds like they're in the process of moving the goalposts again.
Gemsabarmy:
See, even without an education in evolution people can still discover it on their own because it just makes so much freaking sense!
Now, we just have to agree on the word that describes it!
Let's see them say that about the young earth/universe and the global flood story.
