Similar posts

High Priestess Zildar Raasi #conspiracy exposingthelieofislam.weebly.com

Muhammad- the jewish prophet

It has already been well established that Muhammad is in fact fictitious. So why be concerned over a fictitious mans racial identity? Because it illustartes a powerful subconscious tool. The ones duped into following the viscious program of islam are Gentiles, and the puppet masters are the jews. The entire program of islam is jewish from its very core, each and every character within it which Gentiles are made to slavishly worship and praise, are jewish. Their beloved “prophet” is jewish. When one attaches themselves to islam and begins worhsipping the islamic “god”, they are essentially worshipping the jews. The “god” of the monotheistic judaic religions is the jews as a collective and their agenda. The huge amounts of enery raised by the worship of blind devotees filters directly into their agenda, reinforcing it. This is the sole reason why the Gentiles enslaved within the judaic “religions” are made to worship jewish characters.

It has been spoken of indepth how those at the top of these programs are adept in the art of Black Magick and Occult secrets, raising and programming energy, etc… Please see the following links for more details: [links]

The major point is that getting millions upon millions of Gentile people to slavishly worship and praise a jewish figure such as Muhammad will feed energy into the agenda of those who control these programs. This is the reason behind forcing a jewish prophet upon Gntile people. It does not matter that these figures never existed in historical reality. The concepts of these figures, which have taken on lives of their own after being fed with psychic energy from devout worshippers over the centuries and have actually developed into thoughtforms, are enough to feed the agenda. Exactly the same thing was done in the West with the christian jesus. It has been substantially proven that this character never existed, however, belief in this fictitious entity and constant praise and worship from the blind followers has been enough to give it strength.

Now that it is clear how these programs gained their power initially, let us focus on proving that the prophet muhammad was in fact a jewish character enforced upon the Gentile People of the East.

( Dont forget to keep in mind that all of the following characters are FICTITIOUS subliminal tools used to tie believers into a certain energy. As real flesh and blood people they never existed. As tools created for a purpose, they are very real. We will speak of these characters as if they had been literal, in order to prove a point)

First things first, the biggest pointer towards this fact is the descent which muhammad was stated as having claimed. This is mentioned within the quran and many other islamic religious texts. The mother of Muhammad was Aminah, descended from Ishmael of israel. This right here points to muhammad as being of a jewish bloodline. Muhammad is mentioned as being one of the descendents of the jewish Ishmael.

In fact, every ancestor of this “prophet” was taken from the judaic “holy book”. A further example is that of Abraham/Ibrahim= the hebrew father of Ishmael, from whom Muhammad was supposedly descended. According to islamic religious texts, Muhammad referred to himself as a copy of his ancestor Abraham, returned to the Earth to reinstate Abraham’s faith. Now, Abraham’s “faith” is judaism. Islam and christianity are often referreded to as “Abrahamic religions”, which basically means jewish religions.

If Muhammad was supposedly descended from jewish ancestors, it is only natural to say that he would have been jewish by blood, and certainly not a Gentile like the native inhabitants of the area.

As well as ancestry, Muhammad promoted and demanded his followers engage in many jewish religious traditions, such as circumcision, celebrating the jewish holidays like Yom Kippur, kosher food, the teachings of the Old Testament and probably the most significant aspect, the praying in the direction of the jewish city of Jerusalem. Why do I say this is the most significant aspect? Well, this goes back to the raising of Energy. This “prayer”, performed in a very ritualistic manner, raises a large amount of Energy, all focused at the jewish capital. It is blindingly obvious what is going on here.

Why all of the strict adherence to jewish religious practices if this prophet was a Gentile? It would make no sense to suddenly adopt the practices of a foreign tribe, unless you somehow felt bound to that particular tribe.

The following links are for educational purposes only! They do contain certain misinformation with regards to being in support of the judaic programs.

[links]

The above links speak of Muhammads deep devotion to jewish practices and a profound connection with the jewish jerusalem. This is due to the fact that Muhammad himself would have been a jew by blood. Muslims are not revering a Gentile saviour, but a jewish “messiah” created to work towards jewish supremacy.

Not only was he jewish himself, but Muhammad also took jewish wives. This is symbolic for a deep connection between islam and judaism. A marriage is a binding and deep connection. A jewish “princess” by the name of Safiyya Bint Huyayy was taken as a wife of Muhammad, and was regarded as exceptionally influential in the early days of islam, being referred to as “the mother of the believers”. It is deeply telling that the muslim prophet had such deep ties with a jewish princess. Again, subliminal messages of jewish supremacy are reinforced. During these times, it was forbidden for a jew to marry a non-jew. Therefore, it can be safely assumed that in order to marry this jewish princess, Muhammad would have to have posessed the jewish gene himself.

There was also a jewish concubine, Rayhana Bint Zayd, whom Muhammad was said to have had a sexual relationship with and eventually married.
This is taken from a book titled “Muhammad’s Jewish Wives” by Moses Creighton.

These close relationships with jewish women send out a powerful message of jewish supremacy and a strong and significant relationship between judaism and islam.

Having come from a jewish blood line, taking jewish wives, and vehemently promoting jewish religious practices, it can be clearly seen that the character of Muhammad was in fact jewish, and foreign to the Gentile People which are enslaved within this program today. The Gentiles who follow islam are worshipping the jews!

Gentiles Wake Up!!

Gilad Atzmon #racist gilad.co.uk

The ultra Zionist settler outlet Israel National News reported yesterday that “Russian Jews slam ‘anti-Semitic myth’ that the country’s last tsar “was murdered by Jews for ritual purposes."

Marina Molodtsova, a senior investigator for a special ministerial committee on the 1917 slaying of Nicholas II of Russia, said on Monday during a conference in Moscow that her committee will conduct “a psycho-historical examination” to find out whether the execution of the royal family was a ritual murder. At the same event, Father Tikhon Shevkunov, a Russian Orthodox Church bishop, said that, according to “the most rigorous approach to the version of ritual murder, a significant part of the church commission [on Nicholas II’s killing during the Russian revolution of 1917] has no doubt that this murder was ritual.”

Far from being surprising the Jews are upset. “The Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia, a Chabad-affiliated group with more than 100 affiliated communities across Russia, called the suggestions a “shocking expression of an anti-Semitic myth” in a statement Monday.” Interestingly enough, the Jewish bodies are not upset by the verdict of the committee; they are actually distressed by the idea that the Russians decided to look into their past.

“We all think of this as absolutely unacceptable,” the federation’s spokesperson, Boruch Gorin, lamented, and “shocked first and foremost by the sheer absurdity of the allegations.”

The Israeli outlet reports that, “claims that Nicholas was killed by Jews for ritual purposes had been limited before the conference to a fringe of zealous anti-Semites and promoters of unsophisticated conspiracy theories.” Seemingly, this is not the case anymore. Israel National News explains, “amid rising nationalism and nostalgia for Tsarist times in Russia under President Vladimir Putin, a Russian court in 2010 ordered prosecutors to reopen an investigation into the murder of the Tsar and his family.”

I obviously have no opinion on the nature of the execution of the Tsar and his family. Like others I am looking forward to learning more, and will wait patiently for the investigating committee to deliver its study of the event. However, it is worth mentioning that not one historian questions the dominance of Jews within the Bolshevik revolution and the early communist leadership. Not many scholars of the era question the embarrassing fact that “Stalin's Jews” as Israeli prominent writer Sever Plocker names them, were “some of (the) greatest murderers of modern times”

Spokesman Boruch Gorin, who is also a senior aide to Berel Lazar, a chief rabbi of Russia, told Israel National News that, “Nicholas II’s killers were obviously committed atheists who rejected any belief in any force – except their own”. However, the blaming of Jews for the Tsar’s death is “an absolutely anti-Semitic myth used in anti-Semitic propaganda for several decades, which is why the Jews view this with great concern.”

I will make an effort to educate Gorin. Since the European Jewish emancipation, Jews are drifting away from Judaism and their means of identification are varied. As a matter of fact, Judaism is, by now, just one Jewish religion amongst many. The Holocaust seems to be the most popular Jewish religion. Atheism is also a popular Jewish religion. Human Rights is a widespread Jewish religion, however, not as popular as Zionism.

Jewish religions are diverse and often contradict each other. But they have one thing in common-- they all facilitate a sense of choseness – a clear vision of Jewish exceptionalism. Jewish religions all adhere to the strong belief in ‘The Jew.’ The Zionists who murdered Palestine were atheists. They adhered to the peculiar belief that Jews can celebrate their national aspirations at the expense of another people. They believed and still believe in their righteous cause. The many Jews who adhere to the Holocaust religion also believe in ‘The Jew,’ the one who, against all odds, survived the ashes, reinstated his/her power by means of national salvation. The ‘atheist’ Bolsheviks were no different; they believed themselves to be ‘better’ because they believed in equality. This force alone made them into a genocidal cult with no precedent in human history.

Were these Bolsheviks engaged in ritual killing? This is indeed a deep question with many aspects and layers. We will have to wait and see what the Russian committee has to say about it. However, the fact that Russian Jewish bodies are in a state of turmoil may as well be revealing.

Edmund_Kemper #wingnut #transphobia #sexist incels.co

(More from this thread bashing FSTDT)

KeithInc

this retard thinks he can handle being called a bigot and therefore he supports trannies using the women's room because it's the right thing to do. i'm sure if this fag lived 10 years ago, he would've thought this tranny bathroom thing is insane. he thinks it isn't difficult being called a bigot. well, i dare him to condemn the tranny bathroom thing on twitter, and he will be the victim of a viral call-out culture tweet and be harassed by tons of leftists on there, while if he defends it, he'll be praised on there and maybe only a few right-wingers will attempt to hassle him. he should try condemning the tranny bathroom thing on a viral video and he could get doxxed and cyberbullied to death. also being called by a nigger lover by a few people isn't as bad because most people won't hate you for respecting black people. many people WILL hate you if you oppose this trans bathroom shit. when you're taught by the norm that you're an evil monster if you oppose certain "rights", you're gonna support these "rights" out of fear. i know for a fact he'd oppose this trans bathroom thing 10 years ago. and he claims to have a wife. jfl i bet he doesn't. he's probably just some dumb 20 year old pretending to be in his 30s

Skida

this fag says "iT's NoNe oF yOuR BuSiNeSs wHaT BaThRoOm tHeY uSe" yes it is. the reason why trannies with cocks using the women's room or trannies with vaginas using the men's room is controversial is NOT because people are "bigots" it's because we seperate mens room and womens room because of difference in genitals NOT difference in gender/chromosomes. a person with a penis and a person with a vagina sharing the same bathroom is bad because of privacy issues, safety issues, etc. an adult with a penis shouldn't use the same bathroom with a 11 year old girl with a vagina all by herself. what's next? make all bathrooms shared by men and women and make all locker rooms, etc shared by men and women? it is our business because if a man walks into the women's room, women will feel uncomfortable. i'm sure many will feel uncomfortable if a trans woman walked in (but many women wouldn't admit that).

Timjer

"we don't care about you incels, sweety" then why do you post about us? and this faggot thinks IT means pennywise jfl.

(later post)
Jfl at this post-wall roastie

"Swede? Is he talking about me?

Well, I’ve said a lot of things here, so I might have commented on him as well. I doubt that I’m “bluepilled” though, and I’m clearly not a fag. I’m more of a fag-hag…

I accept homosexuals and transgender people because they exist, and are not harmful to anyone else. I’d never write like that with every other letter a vowel, I’d get a cramp in my 50-year-old fingers.

As I call myself SWEDE, whatever AMERICANS approve of or not is clearly not my business. Of course, I care, and I can protest, but I can’t vote on it.

I probably said I WANTED to resist Kim Jong-un, but I don’t know if I would dare. I don’t want to end up like Sophie Scholl in the Weiße Rose.

Ancient Greece didn’t just have teen boys fucking adult men, it had long-term relationships between men of the same age in the army, and in other parts of society.

Ordinary men in history have very seldom married “jb” (jailbait, I guess) girls, as ordinary men needed a house-keeper; someone to organize the home and delegate to the servants what to do. A 12-14-year-old girl can’t do that! As second or third wife; yes, perhaps. Royalty, who needed heirs rather than life-partners, sure, but they were often BOTH small children when they were betrothed to each other.

I KNOW teens, I know that the brain is not fully mature until somewhere around 25 to 30. If anything, people grow up faster now, with better nutrition. Children are ALLOWED to stay children longer now, than before 1900, but that doesn’t mean they were ready and able for it then. After all, it took around a million years to reach the first billion people, but it took only two centuries, after that, to get to 7,7 billion people."

This foid claims to be 50 years old LOL. what 50 year old woman posts on a forum making fun of other people? she's probably saying that to appear "mature" and "wise". she's probably 20. and then she says she accepts lgbt people because they deserve respect, when she probably would've thought of them as "freaks" back in the 50s. and then she says it was rare for jb foids to marry in history when that's BS. if you look up marriage in ancient greece, girls DID marry 14/15 to men twice their age. just because homosexuality/pederasty existed back then doesn't mean men marrying jb foids never happened. also, sex between 2 males back then doesn't mean men married each other back in ancient greece. in ancient egypt, girls usually married at age 12-15 and boys married at usually 15-20. in ancient israel, girls typically married at age 12-13. in the early meiji period, women in japan usually married at 16. in 1371, most 16 year old girls were married and many 15 year olds were too. in the early 1900s, the average age for indian girls married was 13 and it was 20 for boys. before the industrial revolution, in regions like india, china and east europe, many teen girls married to older men.

and then swedes says "jB fOiDs CaN't hAnDLe bEiNg wiVeS". teenagers today maybe that's the case but teens back then grew up a lot faster. this teen brain thing is a MYTH. i've read about how the teen brain is NOT the cause of immature/reckless behavior and that the behavior causes the immature brain and that teens actually act immature because we infantilize them and treat them like kids. laws restrict teens' adult rights didn't appear until the 20th/21st centuries. teens used to be much more mature back in the day.

check out these urls about the teen brain myth: https://drrobertepstein.com/pdf/Epstein-THE_MYTH_OF_THE_TEEN_BRAIN-Scientific_American_Mind-4-07.pdf The Danger of Treating Teens Like Children Are the Brains of Reckless Teens More Mature Than Those of Their Prudent Peers?

now anyways, she once said that people in the 50s were more "live and let live" than i think. ok go back to the 50s and date a black person in public. go ahead. see how it ends.

here's the link: 3$QD8PZ6JVM46

Martinlutherking.org #conspiracy martinlutherking.org


WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But even more insidious than the theft of the people's weapons was the theft of their history. Official Communist "historians" rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many countries, revered national heroes were excised from the history books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit Communist ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted into official "saints." Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts who murdered countless nations.

Did you know that much the same process has occurred right here in America?

Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy of adulation for the so-called "Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr." King has even had a national holiday declared in his honor, an honor accorded to no other American, not Washington, not Jefferson, not Lincoln. (Washington and Lincoln no longer have holidays -- they share the generic-sounding "President's Day.") A liberal judge has sealed the FBI files on King until the year 2027. What are they hiding? Let's take a look at this modern-day plastic god.

Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the time only as "Daddy King." "Daddy King" named his son Michael. In 1935, "Daddy King" had an inspiration to name himself after the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his congregation that henceforth they were to refer to him as "Martin Luther King" and to his son as "Martin Luther King, Jr." None of this name changing was ever legalized in court. "Daddy" King's son's real name is to this day Michael King.

King's Brazen Cheating

We read in Michael Hoffman's "Holiday for a Cheater":

The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled "Life is What You Make It," according to the testimony of King's best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams.

The first book that King wrote, "Stride Toward Freedom, - -was plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow.

And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of "The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose staff includes King's widow Coretta), stated of King's writings at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary: "Judged retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism.... Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his major field of graduate study, systematic theology."

King's essay, "The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God," written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar S. Brightman, author of "The Finding of God."

Another of King's theses, "Contemporary Continental Theology," written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton.

King's doctoral dissertation, "A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman," for which he was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer, "The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich's Concept of God."

According to "The Martin Luther King Papers", in King's dissertation "only 49 per cent of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five or more words that were King's own...."!

In "The Journal of American History", June 1991, page 87, David J. Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that King's wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated cheating. ("King's Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation," The Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87)

Reading Garrow's article, one is led to the inescapable conclusion that King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary. Why, then, one might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89: "King's academic compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost without exception little more than summary descriptions... and comparisons of other's writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting that King's professors did not expect more...." The editors of "The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers" state that "...the failure of King's teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is somewhat remarkable...."

But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us "...actually the malfeasance of the professors is not at all remarkable. King was politically correct, he was Black, and he had ambitions. The leftist [professors were] happy to award a doctorate to such a candidate no matter how much fraud was involved. Nor is it any wonder that it has taken forty years for the truth about King's record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be made public."

Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King's vision of a racially mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his cheating for decades. The cover-up still continues. From the "New York Times" of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that, "There is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation." However, despite its finding, the committee said that "No thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an action the panel said "would serve no purpose."

No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful fraud as a student, the "reverend" and the "doctor" should be removed from King's name.

Communist Beliefs and Connections

Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn't really "Martin Luther King, Jr." What's left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people.

On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate demonstrations and riots.

From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King's associate, advisor, and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23, 1953 the "Los Angeles Times" reported his conviction and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter's ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.

Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized the first of King's famous marches on Washington. The official organ of the Communist Party, "The Worker,- - openly declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left King's employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1963.

Bayard Rustin's replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King was Jack O'Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O'Dell. According to official records, in 1962 Jack O'Dell was a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O'Dell was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis "Globe-Democrat - -of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O'Dell's party membership became known.

What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired O'Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare, "immediately hired him again- - as director of the New York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the "Richmond News-Leader - -of September 27, 1963. In 1963 a Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King's 1963 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf of King's movement. Mr. Williams was also around this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he made regular broadcasts to the southern US, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title "Radio Free Dixie." In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by Blacks against White Americans.

During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled "Negroes With Guns." The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than Martin Luther King, Jr. It is also interesting to note that the editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

According to King's biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, "King privately described himself as a Marxist." In his 1981 book, "The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.", Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, "...we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution.... The whole structure of American life must be changed.... We are engaged in the class struggle."

Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King's behind-the-scenes "handler." Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA, was King's mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King's more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King's book, "Stride Toward Freedom." It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King's income tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King's speeches. King described Levison as one of his "closest friends."

FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money

The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been aware of Stanley Levison's Communist activities. It was Levison's close association with King that brought about the initial FBI interest in King.

Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media's lie about "racists" in the FBI being out to "get" King, you should be aware that the man most responsible for the FBI's probe of King was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself as a liberal, and says that initially "I was one hundred per cent for King...because I saw him as an effective and badly needed leader for the Black people in their desire for civil rights." The probe of King not only confirmed their suspicions about King's Communist beliefs and associations, but it also revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.

According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed to the "civil rights" movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King's speaking and organizing tours.

In fact, an outfit called The National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he was shot, has declined to depict in any way the "occupants - -of those rooms. That "according to exhibit designer Gerard Eisterhold "would be "close to blasphemy." The reason? Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. spent his last night on Earth having sex with two women at the motel and physically beating and abusing a third.

Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of numerous married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years with the Bureau hadáseen everything there was to be seen of the seamy side of life, King was one of only seven people he had ever encountered who was such a total degenerate.

Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King's supposedly "non-violent" marches, Sullivan's probe revealed a very different King from the carefully crafted public image. King welcomed members of many different Black groups as members of his SCLC, many of them advocates and practitioners of violence. King's only admonition on the subject was that they should embrace "tactical nonviolence."

Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a financial conference with Communist Party representatives, not knowing that one of the participants was an infiltrator actually working for the FBI.

J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information on King's Communist connections was provided to the President and to Congress. And conclusive information from FBI files was also provided to major newspapers and news wire services. But were the American people informed of King's real nature? No, for even in the 1960s, the fix was in "the controlled media and the bought politicians were bound and determined to push their racial mixing program on America. King was their man and nothing was going to get in their way. With a few minor exceptions, these facts have been kept from the American people. The pro-King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even reported that a serious proposal has been made to add some of King's writings as a new book in the Bible.

Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of this man called King. I want you to start to think for yourselves. I want you to consider this: What are the forces and motivation behind the controlled media's active promotion of King? What does it tell you about our politicians when you see them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to honor King as a national hero? What does it tell you about our society when any public criticism of this moral leper and Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal? What does it tell you about the controlled media when you see how they have successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture of King that can only be described as a colossal lie? You need to think, my fellow Americans. You desperately need to wake up.

thewatcherfiles #conspiracy #racist thewatcherfiles.com

The History of Jewish Human Sacrifice
By
Willie Martin

At the dawn of civilization, the blood rite, in which human blood is drunk from the body of a still-living victim, was known to many tribes. However, only one people, that has never progressed beyond the Stone Age, has continued to practice the blood rite and ritual murder. This people are know to the world as Jews. Arnold Toynbee, a noted scholar, has called the Jews "a fossil people."

In so doing, he must have been aware of the fact that they still practice ritual murder and the drinking of human blood (especially Christian blood). As a scholar, he could not have failed to note the many attested incidents of this practice of the Jews, for hundreds of example of ritual murder by the Jews are cited in official Catholic books, in every European literature, and in the court records of all the European nations.

It is the official historian of the Jews, (Josef Kastein, in his History of the Jews, who gives the underlying reason for this barbaric custom. On page 173, he says, "According to the primeval Jewish view, the blood was the seat of the soul."

Thus it was not the heart which was the seat of the soul, according to the stone-age Jews, but the blood itself. They believed that by drinking the blood of a Christian victim who was perfect in every way, they could overcome their physical short comings and become as powerful as the intelligent civilized beings among whom they had formed their parasitic communities. Because of this belief, the Jews are known to have practiced drinking blood since they made their first appearance in history.

Jewish Murder Plan Against White Christians Exposed

The Murderous People: The Jews are under a terrible suspicion the world over, and for good reason. Anyone who does not know this, does not understand the Jewish problem. Anyone who merely see the Jews as "a tribe which secures its existence with exchange and old trousers, and whose uniforms are the long noses," is being misled. But anyone who knows the monstrous accusation which has been raised against the jews since the beginning of time, will view these people in a different light. He will begin to see not only a peculiar, strangely fascinating nation; but criminals, murderers, and devils in human form. He will be filled with holy anger and hatred against these people of Satan. (John 8:44)

The suspicion under which the Jews are held is murder. They are charged with enticing White Christian Children (and sometimes blacks to keep them under control - and if necessary they will run black children down in the streets with automobiles to show the blacks their power, and that the blacks had better mind their manners or the same will happen again and again. We all witnessed this a few years ago in New York city when the car of Rabbi Shneerson ran over a black child. And as usual the Jews bought off the blacks who were inciting the mobs against them; if they had been unsuccessful in this they would have had the blacks who dared not be controlled murdered) and at time White Christian adults, butchering them, and draining their blood. They are charged with mixing this blood into their masses (unleaven bread) and using it to practice superstitious magic. They are charged with torturing their victims, especially the children; and during this torture they shout threats, curses, and cast spells against non-Jews. This systematic murder has a special name, it is called,

Ritual Murder

The knowledge of Jewish ritual murder is thousands of years old. It is as old as the Jews themselves. Non-Jews have passed the knowledge of it from generation to generation, and it has been passed down to us thorough writings. It is known of throughout the nation. Knowledge of ritual murder can be found in even the most secluded rural villages. The grand-father told his grand children, who passed it on to his children, and his children's children, until we have inherited the knowledge today from them.

It is also befalling other nations. The accusation is loudly raised immediately, anywhere in te world, where a body is found which bears the marks of ritual murder. This accusation is raised only against the Jews. Hundreds and hundreds of nations, tribes, and races live on this earth, but no one ever thought to accuse them of the planned murdering of children, or to call them murderers. All nations have hurled this accusation only against the Jews.

And many great men have raised such an accusation. Martin Luther wrote in his book "Of The Jews And Their Lies:"

"They stabbed and pierced the body of the young boy Simon of Trent. They have also murdered other children...The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they who imagine to be the people of God, and who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. Jesus Christ, the Almighty Preacher from Nazareth, spoke to the Jews: ? Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning..."


"He (Martin Luther) accused them (the Jews) of all those fictitious crimes which had made Europe such a hell for them. He, too, claimed that they poisoned the wells used by Christians, assassinated their Christian patients, and murdered Christian children to procure blood for the Passover. He called on the princes and rulers to persecute them mercilessly, and commanded the preachers to set the mobs on them. He declared that if the power were his, he would take all the leaders of the Jews and tear their tongues out by the roots." (Stranger than Fiction, p. 249)

The Struggle of Der Sturmer: The only newspaper in Germany, yes, in the entire world, which often screamed the accusation of ritual murder into the Jewish face, was Der Sturmer. For more than ten yeas Der Sturmer led a gigantic battle against Judaism. Which caused Der Sturmer to be under constant attack by the Jews. Dozens of times it has been confiscated and prohibited.

Its workers, most of all its editor Julius Streicher, were dragged into court hundreds of times. They were convicted, punished and locked into prison. Der Sturmer came to know the Jew from the confession which Dr. Conrad Alberti-Sittenfeld, a Jew, wrote in 1899 in No. 12 of the magazine Gesellschaft:

"One of the most dangerous Jewish qualities is the brutal, direct barbaric intolerance. A worse tyranny cannot be practiced than that which the Jewish clique practices. If you try to move against this Jewish clique, they will, without hesitating, use brutal methods to overcome you. Mainly the Jew tries to destroy his enemy in the mental area, by which he takes his material gain away, and undermines his civil existence. The vilest of all forms of retaliation, the boycott, is characteristically Jewish."

The Der Sturmer was not stopped for several years. Just in Nuremberg alone there have been fought dozens of Talmudic and ritual murder cases in the courts. (Now you know why the Nuremberg trials were held against the German Military leaders, it was retribution by the Jews on their hated enemies the Germans). Because of the Jewish protests the attention of the world was focused on these cases. Thereafter heavy convictions followed. At first no judge had the courage to expose the Jewish problem. Finally in 1932 (court case lasting from October 30th to November 4th) Der Sturmer won its first victory. The jury found the following:

1). Der Sturmer was not fighting against the Jewish religion; but against the Jewish people.
2). The Talmud and Schulchan aruch are not religious books. They have no right to be protected under the religious paragraphs.
3). The laws of the Talmud which are quoted and published in Der Sturmer are exact quotations from the Talmud.
4). The laws of the Talmud are in harsh contradiction to German morals.
5). The Jews of today are being taught from the Talmud.

With this verdict Der Sturmer brought about the first big breach in the Jewish/Roman Administration of Justice, which was given the job before the National Socialist revolution to protect Judaism and its government. The jews, of course, became greatly agitated about this. But for De Sturmer this success was an omen of the victory yet to come. Of course, Der Sturmer did not stop half way. It knew what had to be done. It was their duty, or so they believed. To frustrate the gigantic murder plot of Judaism against humanity. It was their duty! To brand this nation before the world, to uncover its crimes and to render it harmless. It was their duty! To free the world from this national pest and parasitic race. Der Sturmer would fulfill its mission. It would, for a time, light up the darkness with the truth which shall eventually rule the world. And it would always direct itself according to the following proverb: "He who knows the truth and does not speak it truly is a miserable creature."

The Laws of The Talmud: If one wishes to learn and understand why the Jews can commit such insane crimes as ritual murder, they must know the Jewish secrets. They must know the teachings of the Torah (The Talmud), and the Schulchan aruch. These laws and teachings are proof that the Jews feel themselves superior to all nations, that it has declared war on all other races, and that it is the sworn enemy of the whole of non-Jewish humanity. Even Tactius, the Roman historian who lived shortly after Christ (55-120) A.D.) wrote:

"The Jews are a race that hate the gods and mankind. Their laws are in opposition to those of all mortals. They despise what to us is holy. Their laws condone them in committing acts which horrify us." (Historian V. 3-8)

The Jew knows that when the non-Jewish world knows his laws and sees through his plans that he is lost. Therefore, by threat of death he forbids their translation and publication. A well known Jewish scholar (Dibre David) writes:

"If the Gentiles (non-Jews) knew what we are teaching against them, they would kill us."

The Jewish secret laws are based on the fundamental principle which states: Only the Jew is human. In contrast all non-Jews are animals, they are beasts in human form. Anything is permitted against them. The Jew may lie to, cheat and steal from them. He may rape and murder them. There are hundreds of passages in the Talmud which the non-jews are described as animals. Some of them are as follows:


1). "The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts." (Talmud: Baba Mezia 114b)

2). "The Akum (Negro) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor the dog more than the Akum." (Ereget Raschi Erod. 22
30)

3). "Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an
animal. Therefore he will be served by animals in human form." (Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855)

4). "A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal." (Coschen Hamischpat 405)

5). "The souls of non-Jews come from impure spirits and are called pigs." (Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b)

6). "Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human." (Schene
Luchoth Haberith, p. 250b)

So that the Jew will never forget that he is dealing with animals, he is reminded by eating, by death, and even by sexual intercourse constantly. For The Talmud teaches:

1). "If you eat with a non-Jew, it is the same as eating with a dog." (Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b)

2). "If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant of maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell to the Jew:
?God will replace ?your loss,' just as if one of his oxen or asses had died." (Jore Dea 377, 1)

3). "Sexual intercoms between non-Jews is like intercourse between animals." (Sanhedrin 74b)

It is written in the Talmud about the murder of the non-Jew:

1). "It is permitted to take the body and the life of a non-Jew." (Sepher Ikkarim IIIc, 25)

2). "It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah (Talmud - Sanhedrin 59b). The Christians
belong to the denying ones of the Torah (Talmud)." (Coschen Hamischpat 425, Hagah 425, 5)

3). "Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jew), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God." (Bammidber Raba, c 21 & Jalkut 772)

These laws of the Talmud were given to the Jews over 3000 years ago. They are just as valid today as they were back then. This is how the Jews are taught from childhood. The results of this stands before us. It is Jewish Ritual Murder.

The Jews' Bloody History: The Jew is not only the murderer of the Christians in theory. His history proves that he practices what he preaches. The history of the Jewish people is an unbroken chain of mass murders and blood-baths. It started before Christ and has continued with Linen, Trotsky, Sinowjeff, Stalin and etc., up to today:

1). The extreme to which the Jews will go was shown in Persia where the Jew Mordecai and the Jewess Esther had 75,800 Persians murdered. They hanged the Persian King Xerxes' minister Haman along with his ten sons. They celebrated this bloody victory and to this day still celebrate it during the Feast of Purim. (Book of Esther 9:6)

After Christ in the years 115-117, on the island of Cyrene, the Jews revolted under their leader Bar Kochba. They murdered 220,000 Romans, sawed and chopped them, drank their blood, and ate their bloody raw flesh. (Dio Cassius: Roemische Jeschichte XVIII, 32)

The Jews revolted in Russia in 1917 and established bolshevism under the leadership of Trotsky, Sinojeff and other Jews, a total of 35 million Christians were shot, slayed, tortured, and starved to death. In Hungary, under the leadership of the Bolshevik Jew Bela Kuhn, a horrible massacre was prepared in which tens of thousands of Christians were murdered.

"'The Jewish Establishment": 'In the early 1930s, Walter Duranty of the New York Times was in Moscow, covering Joe Stalin the way Joe Stalin wanted to be covered. To maintain favor and access, he expressly denied that there was famine in Ukraine even while millions of Ukrainian Christians were being starved into submission. For his work Duranty won the Pulitzer Prize for journalism. To this day, the Times remains the most magisterial and respectable of American newspapers. How imagine that a major newspaper had had a correspondent in Berlin during roughly the same period who hobnobbed with Hitler, portrayed him in a flattering light, and denied that Jews were being mistreated, thereby not only concealing, but materially assisting the regime's persecution. Would that paper's respectability have been unimpaired several decades later? There you have an epitome of what is lamely called 'media bias.' The Western supporters of Stalin haven't just been excused; they have received the halo of victim hood for the campaign, in what liberals call 'the McCarthy era,' to get them out of the government, the education system, and respectable society itself. Not only persecution of Jews but any critical mention of Jewish power in the media and politics is roundly condemned as 'anti-Semitism.' But there isn't even a term of opprobrium for participation in the mass murders of Christians. Liberals still don't censure the Communist attempt to extirpate Christianity from Soviet Russia and its empire, and for good reason, liberals themselves, particularly Jewish liberals, are still trying to uproot Christianity from America. It's permissible to discuss the power of every other group, from the Black Muslims to the Christian Right, but the much greater power of the Jewish establishment is off-limits. That, in fact, is the chief measure of its power: its ability to impose its own taboos while tearing down the taboos of others, you might almost say its prerogative of offending. You can read articles in Jewish-controlled publications from the Times to Commentary blaming Christianity for the Holocaust or accusing Pope Pius XII of indifference to it, but don't look for articles in any major publication that wants to stay in business examining the Jewish role in Communism and liberalism, however temperately." (The Jewish Establishment, Joseph Sobran, September 1995 issue)

In Jewish-Bolshevik Soviet Russia mass murders are even now (1997) are being carried out. The executioners are mostly Jewish men and women. In inventing new methods of torture the Jews are past masters. To let Christians die under torture give them the greatest pleasure. English reporters write that the Chinese executioners frequently would not carry out their tortures and executions; they shouldered and could not continue. Therefore, Jews and Jewesses took their place.

"The Jews were now free to indulge in their most fervent fantasies of mass murder of helpless victims. Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain. Others were placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died of exhaustion. Others were chained to the floor and left hanging until they died of exhaustion.

"Others were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death. Christian mothers were taken to the public square and their babies snatched from their arms. A red Jewish terrorist would take the baby, hold it by the feet, head downward and demand that the Christian mother deny Christ. If she would not, he would toss the baby into the air, and another member of the mob would rush forward and catch it on the tip of his bayonet.

"Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies. There were many places of public execution in Russia during the days of the revolution, one of which was described by the American Rohrbach Commission: 'The whole cement floor of the execution hall of the Jewish Cheka of Kiev was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains and pieces of skull. All the walls were bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter of 25 centimeters wide by 25 centimeters deep and about 10 meters long was along its length full to the top with blood. Some bodies were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out, the head, face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds. Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate.'" (Defender Magazine, October 1933)

The history of the Jews is written in the blood of Christians.

"Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews' Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100-million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is not yet." (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Judah, 1869, Henry Ford also noted that: 'It was a Jew who said, 'Wars are the Jews' harvest'; but no harvest is so rich as civil wars.' The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem, Vol. III, p. 180)

The history of the Jews is written with Christian blood. Their history proves that the Jew is extremely cruel and at the same time a coward. The Jew is not a born soldier; he is a born sadist and murderer. (John 8:44)

The Law of Human Sacrifice: For a long time the newspaper Der Sturmer endeavored to find the actual law of ritual murder, the law of human sacrifice. It finally succeeded in doing so. In a trial in which Julius Streicher and Karl Holz were being tried (because of "offending the Jewish Religious Society") it was proposed that they call as witness Dr. Erich Bischoff. Dr. Bischoff appeared.


He was the leading German expert on the laws of the Talmud. He had dedicated his entire life to the study of the Jewish law books. Dr. Bischoff brought with him a translation of a secret Jewish law, which clarified with one stroke the question of ritual murder. It comes from the book of Sohar. This book is considered to be holy by the Jews.


"You are right! This reproach of yours, which I feel for certain is at the bottom of your anti-Semitism, is only too well justified; upon this common ground I am quite willing to shake hands with you and defend you against any accusation of promoting Race Hatred...We [Jews] have erred, my friend, we have most grievously erred. And if there is any truth in our error, 3,000, 2,000 maybe 100 years ago, there is nothing now but falseness and madness, a madness which will produce even greater misery and wider anarchy. I confess it to you openly and sincerely and with sorrow...We who have posed as the saviors of the world...We are nothing but the world' seducers, it's destroyers, it's incinderaries, it's executioners...we who promised to lead you to heaven, have finally succeeded in leading you to a new hell...There has been no progress, least of all moral progress...and it is our morality which prohibits all progress, and what is worse -- it stands in the way of every future and natural reconstruction in this ruined world of ours...I look at this world, and shudder at its ghastliness: I shudder all the ore, as I know the spiritual authors of all this ghastliness..." The eastern Jews especially conform to its laws. In the book of Sohar (a companion of the Talmud). The English translation related:

"Further there is a Law concerning the slaughter of foreigners, who are the same as beasts. This slaughter is to be carried out in a lawfully valid manner. The ones who do not follow the Jewish Religious Law have to be offered to God as a sacrifice. It is to them that Psalm 44:22 refers: ?Yea, for thy sake are we killed all the day long; we are counted as sheep for the slaughter." (Thikunne Sohar, edition Berdiwetsch 88b)

Dr. Erich Bischoff declared himself ready to offer an opinion on this expressed law of ritual murder. However he was rejected. He was not admitted by the court for "fear of bias."


The Catholic priest Dr. Gottsberger took his place. The defendants handed him the above mentioned law in Hebrew and German. Dr. Gottsberger was embarrassed and confused.

After a long consideration he stated that he would not be able to deliver an opinion on the law of human sacrifice. Due to this Julius Streicher and Karl Holz were sentenced to several months imprisonment. Later on, however, Dr. Bischoff (in the trial of 30th October - 4th November 1931) established the correct translation of this law.

This translation and publication of the law of human sacrifice is the greatest blow ever struck the Jews in this controversy. This Law commands the Jews to Butcher Christians and non-Jews. This is to be done in a "Lawful Valid Way." This means that Christians are to be sacrificed in the same way as animals. They are to be sacrificed to the Jewish God Baal (Lucifer, Devil, Satan). Therefore, we are dealing with a law which doesn't only permit the practice of Ritual Murder. But commands it.

Jewish Confessions: A further and irrefutable proof of the existence of Jewish Ritual Murder are the numerous Jewish confessions. They come from trials, voluntary statements and from confessions by former rabbis. The confessions were made in two court cases. One of them took place in Trent in 1475, and the other one in Damascus in the years 1840 - 1842.

The voluntary statement was made by the young Jewess Ben Noud who made it to the French Count Durfort-Civrac. The confessions were made by the following rabbis who truly converted to Christianity: Drach and Goschler, Fra Sifto of Siena, Paolo Medici, Giovanni da Feltre and by the former chief rabbi Neofito, who later changed his name to Teofito and became a monk. These men more or less confirmed the existence of Ritual Murder. In 1803 the former rabbi Neofito published a sensational book in the Moldavian language. In it he gives details about the terrible Jewish secret of the blood mystery. This book was translated in 1843 into Greek and later in 1883 into Italian, under the title "Il sangue cristiano nei riti ebraici della moderna Sinagoga," causing the Jews to become very excited the world over.

On page 19 of this work the Jew Teofito confesses how he was initiated into the knowledge of Ritual Murder. And how the Jews for thousands of years have concealed it from the Christian and non-Jewish world. Teofito writes:

"This secret of the blood is not know to all the Jews, but only to the Chakam (doctors) or the rabbis and the scholars, who therefore carry the title ?Conservatori del mistero del sangue' (Conservators of the mystery of blood!). They pass it on by word of mouth to the Jewish fathers. They in turn reveal it to their sons who regard this as a great honor. At the same time they make terrible threats of punishment if one of them betrays this secret...


"And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hope of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us Christians as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther. O how they love that book Esther, which so nicely agrees with their bloodthirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope!When I was 13 years old, recalls Teofito; mother took me aside, led me into a room, where nobody could listen and after he described to me the hatred of Christians, he taught me that God ordered the Christians to be slaughtered and to collect their blood...'My son,' he said (as he kissed me): ?With this confession I have placed my trust in you.' With these words he put a crown on my head and explained to me the Blood Secret, adding that Jehovah had revealed it to the Jews and commanded them to practice it ...I was in the future, possessor of the most important secret of the Jewish religion...

"Thereafter followed the curses and threats of punishment if I should ever reveal this secret to anyone, neither my mother nor my sister nor brothers or future wife; but only to one of my future sons who was the most wise, eager, and most suitable. In this way the secret shall be inherited from father to son until the farthest descendant."

This is a part of the monk and former Chief Rabbi Teofito's confession. From other confessions and admissions there is a remarkable agreement on the following points:

1). The laws demand the Jews to butcher non-Jews from time to time. (The Laws of The Talmud and the Law of Human Sacrifice)

2). The sacrifice shall take place chiefly:

a. At the Purim Festival
b. At the Passover Festival

It is demanded of the Jews to butcher an adult Christian if possible, or a black non-Jew for the Purim and to butcher a child for the Passover. The child must not be over seven years old and must die in agony.

3). The blood of the victims must be violently drained. It is to be used at Passover in wine and in the Massen (bread). What this means is that a small part of the blood is mixed into the dough and the wine. The procedure is to be performed by the Jewish father.

4). The procedure takes place in the following manner: The father pours a few drops of fresh or dried and powdered blood into a glass, dips a finger of his left hand into it and sprinkles (blesses) everything which is on the table, saying: "Dam Issardia chynim heroff Jsyn prech harbe hossen mashus pohorus." (Erod, VII, 12) Which translated is: "We therefore beg God to send down the ten plagues upon all the enemies of the Jewish religion (This means the Christians. With this they dine and afterwards the father cries):"Sfach, chaba, moscho kol hagoym!" Which translated: "Thus (like the child whose blood has been mixed in the bread and wine) may all Goyim burn in hell!" (This wicked Jewish ritual is suspiciously similar to Christian Communion. In this the wine is taken in place of the blood and the bread as the body. What Christians do symbolically, the Jews do in reality: this is the unique difference. But it is like all Jewish teachings, it is the reverse of what is taught by God Almighty and the Lord Jesus Christ in the Bible).

5). The ritual blood is also used other ways:

a. The young married couple is given a hard boiled egg which is seasoned with dried blood which has been pulverized.
b. It is also given to pregnant women in the same way in order to ease their child birth.
c. It is mixed with egg-white, put on a linen cloth and placed on the chest of dead Jews so that they will enter heaven without atonement.
d. At circumcision powdered blood will be sprinkled on the wound so it will heal quickly.
e. Dip fruits or vegetables into it and then eat them, (Schuldran arch Orach cajjim 158,4) or
f. A dying or decrepit Jew can be saved with it. (Jore Deah 155,3)

The Jews have a superstition which originates from the Orient. They believe that old people can become younger by drinking the blood of young children.

6). The remainder of the blood is preserved with the greatest of care by the local rabbis and sold in small bottles by appointed wandering Jews at neighboring synagogues. This same rabbi certifies that the blood is genuine pure Christian blood.

7). The Ritual Murder and the Blood Mystery are acknowledge by all Talmudic Jews, and practiced whenever possible. The Jew believes that he will be "atoned" by it.

The Hurons, the Canadians and the Iroquois were philosophers of humanitarianism in comparison to the jews. These are seven Jewish customs and regulations were established not only in the trials from Trent and Damascus, but in various trials and court cases which took place in different parts of the world throughout history. And of course they were completely independent of each other. This proves beyond a doubt their truth and validity.


Civilized people find this practice so abhorrent that they cannot believe it, despite the hundreds of pages of evidence against the Jews which are found in court records. Historical records for five thousand years have provided irrefutable proof of the blood gu

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

By God's grace, if you trust my opinion, I am going to share with you what I believe to be the real story behind the now developing New World Order (i.e., a one world system of world government). I like to cite as many sources as possible. Let's face it, anybody can say anything, but that doesn't make it true. I will try to prove my teachings, for your benefit. This article just may be one of the most important I've ever written, as it cuts to the heart of the New World Order. Most Christians today are woefully ignorant of the things I am going to teach you. Consequently, they are actually supporting Satan's New World Order. As believers, we ought to fight against spiritual wickedness, not promote it!

You also need to understand that President Donald Trump is not America's friend. He won't restore America's greatness. Transgendered bathrooms aren't going away. Same-sex perversion is here to stay. Abortion won't be made illegal. Hollywood is only going to wax worse and worse. No nation can truly be “great” unless it's good. When our nation was good, we had great churches. Today's churches are lukewarm, worldly, indifferent toward the purity of God's Word, confused concerning the Gospel, even denying the inspiration of the King James Bible.

We have no real culture or freedom anymore. You are a slave, whether you want to admit it or not. We are slaves to the Wall Street banks, which is why you have to pay $350,000 for a decent home and pay for it for the rest of your life. Even the highest leaders in our nation are totally helpless to stop the banks. Think about that! No one can stop the Federal Reserve. Many have tried, but failed. Lest you missed it, Mr. Trump is not keeping his promise to “drain the swamp”; but in fact, is filling the swamp with more Goldman Sachs scum, as if the 37 former Goldman Sachs employees that President Obama hired weren't enough!!! Not all Americans are dumb! Please see: Lying Conman Donald Trump Hiring Goldman Sachs Executives After Anti-Wall Street Rhetoric. While campaigning for the presidency in 2016, Mr. Trump boldly talked a lot of big talk about giving control of Washington back to the American people, and ridding the White House of insider lobbyist interests.

If you go online to verify Mr. Obama hiring 37 Goldman Sachs employees, the first website that comes up on Google is “FactCheck.Org,” which was started by the Annenberg Foundation, which is owned by a Jewish family. Talk about deception! It's just more disinformation, misinformation and outright lies. America, you are under attack! You are the victim of the Zionist-controlled media, who are owned and controlled by elite Masonic Jews, and their goal is to manipulate your family, make you their whore for the rest of your life, and exploit everything you have to build their New World Order. Literally, they want to control the world, awaiting their false messiah, the Jewish Antichrist.

If you think I've lost it, please research as I have done for thousands of hours, then disagree with me. I get so sick of wicked people disagreeing with me, who have never read a single book on the subject at hand. Theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking is right, “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge!” Today's ungodly pastors, even after being warned about the Devil's Bible revisions, still couldn't care less. They just keep enjoying the good life, parasiting off Christianity for a salary. I am going to share some information with you in this article, which will open your eyes if you'll let it. Pray for God to help you see THE TRUTH. Our churches today have been deceived, suckered into Dispensationalism, that idolizes manmade Israel and the Jews. Dr. Cyrus I. Scofield was hired by Masonic Jews to create Dispensationalism, with the intent of tricking the churches to support the rebirth of Israel (which happened in 1948), which was put there by Masonic Jews, not God. I worship the God of Israel, not Israel.

Ungodly Masonic Jews Exert Control Over the World

First, we learn in Revelation 17:18 (one of our text verses from the King James Bible) about “THAT GREAT CITY,” which reigns over the kings of the earth. The Greek word for “reigneth” is echo, meaning, “to hold.” The Greek word for “kings” is basileus, meaning “sovereign.” Thus, it doesn't mean that the great city rules over the world's kings; but rather, it exerts control over these sovereign nations, compelling them to do what they desire. We read in Revelation 11:8 about “THE GREAT CITY,” which spiritually is called “Sodom” and “Egypt” (two of the most wicked places in history). The Bible plainly identifies “the great city” as the place “where also our Lord was crucified.” This can only mean JERUSALEM (or, effectively, Jews).

Freemasonry is synonymous with Zionism (i.e., the manmade present-day state of Israel established in 1948). Freemasonry is steeped in Lucifer worship. It's symbol is an erect male phallus (e.g., The Washington Monument, which is 666 inches wide and 666 feet tall). The erect male phallus is a symbol of occult power (that is, the hidden power working behind world governments). This is what the Bible means in Revelation 17:4-5 (our text passage). ...

All wars are pre-arranged by this secret Ruling Cabal which is best defined as the circle of top world Banksters and industrialist run out of the City of London Financial District, a separate country like the Vatican with its own ambassadors and police. These folks claim to be personally anointed by Lucifer himself and some have claimed to have personal alien or demon guides that provide protection and counsel. Thus all wars are Bankster wars and appear to be demonically inspired. Some experts have discovered a strong association with secret esoteric “super-masonic” occult groups which are Luciferian based and this Ruling Cabal.

SOURCE: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/35-things-the-ruling-cabal-does-not-want-you-to-know/

Please watch the video documentary, MASONIC LODGE OVER JERUSALEM (by Dr. Texe Marrs - HERE'S A BACKUP LINK FOR THE VIDEO IF IT GOES DEAD, as they often do, for telling THE TRUTH). We are going to soon see apocalyptic events foretold in the Holy Bible in the Middle East. An elite group of men in secret societies have grabbed control over the finance, political rulership and religious groups. These men are the Illuminati. They are Jewish. Jerusalem is Biblically called “Sodom” and “Egypt” (two of the most wicked places in history). They have been using the United States as their proxy (to do their dirty work). This is why the Bible says these men have fornicated with the kings of the earth. They are power whores! A “whore” sells herself. The churches today are selling themselves in spiritual whoredom to ecumenism.

Is Freemasonry Jewish? It is controlled by high level Jewish interests. There is irrefutable evidence that Freemasonry is steeped in Lucifer worship. A New York Masonic lodge publication of the B'nai Brith called Woman's Voice (published in 1953) boasted that “Freemasonry is Jewry!” FREEMASONRY IS JEWISH!!! This is important for everyone to understand. Once you've worked your way up to the 16th level in Freemasonry, you're given the title, “PRINCE OF JERUSALEM”!

A FERVENT MASONIC DESIRE TO REBUILD SOLOMON'S TEMPLE IS THE DRIVING FORCE BEHIND THE EVENTS OF THE MID-EAST TODAY. ONCE COMPLETED, END TIMES' PROPHECY WILL BE FULFILLED! (II THESSALONIANS 2:4)

WHO CONTROLS THE ECONOMY? Nearly all Jewish Freemasons! Today the nation of Israel, and the higher level Jewish positions in banking, finance, media, the corporate world, and the higher level positions... ARE ALL HELD BY FREEMASONS!!! The Masonic lodge and Jewry are deeply connected!!!

Some TERFs #sexist reddit.com

Re: Cultures that have ‘third genders’ don’t prove transgenderism is either ubiquitous or progressive

(LittleOwl12)
There's a lot of "noble savage" romanticism in trans ideology. They don't respect these cultures enough to learn anything in depth about them. They just want what they want out of it,

(baremon7)
It looks more like a barbaric practice of mainly men that don't embrace a sexist toxic form of masculinity to set them apart from women, but see themselves as non-men. it is enforced in the hierarchy of a male system.

Women that don't feel like women can just be killed by their family.

(lefterfield)
That's been my conclusion from reading about the vast majority of third gender cultures. It's infuriating when libfems try to justify transgenderism with it, when it's clear they know nothing about the practices or the cultures.

(LumpyTrust)
And how many of these "third genders" treated the person as a member of the opposite sex? Unless they were treated identically to members of the opposite sex, it's not comparable to modern trans.

They say "Transwomen are women", not "transwomen are a third category/transwomen are a category of biological males".

(Elle_Ciel)
Having extra genders doesn't make any sense unless the culture already had a rigid gender role binary. Not to mention the implication that being gay or GNC makes you a less valid or valuable member of your sex so you get tossed into the "non-man" category. None of these cultures viewed GNC men the same as actual women, and certainly not the same as being biologically female. Were they even allowed to have relationships or marriages with other men? Just because this is better than how they'd be treated in most cultures influenced by Abrahamic religions, that doesn't mean all these tribes lived in progressive, queer-affirming, sex-positive intersectional feminist utopias. /eyeroll?

I'm no anthropologist so feel free to chime in with any evidence to the contrary, but it seems like a lot of "third genders" are just for males. What did they do with the lesbians or transmen?

(womenopausal)
Married off and repeatedly impregnated is my guess.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

The term "holidays or “holy days” essentially means "hell" days or “heel” days, for they mark the time that the underworld (hell), experiences the wrath of the Roman Empire’s heel or boot. During Roman times, holy days were referred to as "Feriae" (F+R), meaning “Four” days or “Fear” days (i.e., the number 4 is a sacred Roman number and is most often depicted as a cross), as both animal and human alike were routinely slaughtered for sport and sacrafice. Roman holy days were defined by the Roman scholar and writer Marcus Terentius Varro as "days instituted for the sake of the gods”. Roman religious rites were performed on the “feriae”, public business was suspended, and slaves were to be given some form of rest.

Roman Calendar
According to modern historical sources, festivals in ancient Rome were an important part of Roman religious life and one of the primary features of the Roman calendar. The first days of each Roman month were allegedly entitled Kalends or Kalendae which is where the English word "calendar" was untimely derived from. The term Kalendae (K+L+N+D) meaning “Killing Day”, essentially morphed into the word “calendar” which can be translated literally to “Killing Day of Rome” as the letter “R” always equates to Rome. In other words, the Roman calendar was the schedule of killings which was celebrated with lavish feasts, ceremonies and public spectacles.

Roman Religion = Jewish Religion
Aside from the Hollywood films and television shows entitled “Roman Holiday” (1953) and “The Roman Holidays” (1972), Roman holy days are celebrated in the underworld in modern times by the Jewish people through their counterfeit religion of Judaism whose holy days reflects almost exectly, the dates, festivals, sacrifices and rituals of the Roman Empire. Although the names have been altered, the dates and meaning behind the two religions is the same and therefore the Jewish people unwittingly execute the Roman's dirty work in the underworld. Of the 12 major Jewish holidays (see list below), each one coincides in some way with a Roman holiday, regardless of the fact that the dates change from year to year. So unless the Jews are Romans, which they obviously are not, there is no explicable reason why over 90% of all Jewish holidays fall on Roman holidays and vice versa. In other words, unless the Romans designed the Jewish religion to mirror their own religion, down to every single date and detail, there is no logical explanation for this phenomenon. Therefore, in order to guarantee that Roman holy days are continually celebrated with human sacrifices (i.e., assassinations, terror attacks and war) in the underworld, the dates and meanings of the Jewish holy days must be exactly the same as the Romans, which they are. As the Bible verse Matthew 6:10 explains, "Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven (Greenland)".

Star of David
The Star of David, known in Hebrew as the Shield of David or Magen David, is widely recognized as the symbol of Jewish identity and Judaism. It is shaped in the form of a hexagon, a 6-pointed star that is formed by the compound of two equilateral triangles. The number 6 is a favorite esoteric number of Rome which is most commonly associated with death and destruction. The name “David” (D+V+D) means "Divide" and the therefore the "Star of David" means the "Star of Steer of the Divide". In other words, the Jewish people are steered by Rome to keep the peolple divided amoungst themselves, but more importantly, to keep the divide between upper Earth (Greenland) and the underworld (hell). The hexagon is significant because through the use and abuse of the Jewish people, Rome has effectively put a hex (curse) or a hoax on all of mankind. The two opposing triangles depicted in the Star of David (see below) can be taken quite literally as what is ordered by Rome in Greenland is reflected and executed in the underworld by the Jewish people through the main Roman proxy state of Switzerland.

[Selected DCT analysis of Jewish holy days below.]

Hanukkah
Hanukkah, widely known as the Feast of Dedication, is an 8-day Jewish holiday allegedly commemorating the rededication of the Holy Temple (e.g., the Second Temple) in Jerusalem, regardless of the fact that all aspects which pertain to temples and temple building (e.g., arches, columns, domes, etc.,) are Greco-Roman in nature. In reality, Hanukkah is likely a counterfeit Roman holyday created to commemorate the ceremonies, rituals and human sacrifices associated with Rome’s new temple in either Sicily (i.e., the Second Temple; the First Temple being built in either Crete or Athens, Greece) or the third and final temple which was built in Greenland (most likely Thule) just prior to the alleged fall of the RomanEmpire. In 2013, the Jewish holy days of Hanukkah are celebrated on November 27-December 5. Coincidentally, the Roman temple ceremonies of Neptune and Pietas are held on December 1; the celebration of the Roman goddess Bona Dea are held on December 3; and the Roman country festival for Faunus held by the pagi is celebrated on December 5. In 2013, Hanukkah is celebrated on December 16-24. Coincidentally, Saturnalia, which is held in honor of Saturn with the public ritual on December 17 is celebrated by the Romans from December 17-23; the holy day of Opalia is celebrated in honor of the Roman god Ops on December 19; the Romans celebrate Divalia in honor of Angerona on December 21; the Roman sacrifice to Hercules and Ceres is also given on the December 21 which also coincides with the Winter Solstice (e.g., years 2013, 2014, 2016); the Roman anniversary of the Temple of the Lares Permarini in the Porticus Minucia is celebrated December 22, which also coincides with the Winter Solstice in 2015; the Roman holy day of Sigillaria, the last day of the Saturnalia which is devoted to gift (poison) giving, is celebrated a day later on December 23; Larentalia, which commemorates the Roman temples of Diana and Juno Regina in the Circus Flaminius is also celebrated on December 23; and finally, Tempestates, the Roman god of weather is also celebrated on December 23.

Passover
The Passover is a 7-day Jewish festival held to commemorate the Jewish people’s alleged liberation over 3,300 years ago by God from slavery in ancient Egypt, as well as the birth of their nation under the leadership of Moses. In reality, the Passover is likely a counterfeit Roman holiday created to commemorate Rome’s liberation from the underworld by G.O.D. (Greenland of Denmark) as they “passed over” from the bottom side (the dark side) of the Earth to the top side (the sunny side). In 2013, the Jewish Passover is held from April 3-11 which coincidentally bookends the Roman games of Ludi Megalenses or Megalesia, which occurs on April 4-10 in honor of the Magna Mater or Cybele, a Greco-Roman goddess. In 2014, the Jewish Passover is held from April 14-22. Coincidentally, the Roman holy day of Fordicidia is celebrated with offering of a pregnant cow is sacrificed to Tellus ("Earth") on April 15, also known as “Tax Day” in America. Coincidentally, the modern holiday known as Earth Day is celebrated annually a week later on April 22. The Roman festival Parilia in honor of Pales and the dies natalis of Rome also falls within the 2014 Jewish Passover on April 21.

Sukkot
Sukkot, known as the “Feast of Tabernacles”, is a mandated Jewish festival which allegedly commemorates when the Hebrews were commanded to make a pilgrimage to the Temple in Jerusalem. In reality, Sukkot is likely a counterfeit Roman holy day created to celebrate the mandate by Rome to all of its chosen people to make the pilgrimage from the underworld to Greenland in order to escape the aforementioned Days of Judgment which were slated to befall the underworld. The term “Sukkot” (S+K+T) likely means “System Military Base”, as KT is the name of a Roman military base. In all likelihood, Sukkot was a mandate by Rome to all of its top military personal located around the world to instantly retreat back to Rome. Once there, they made the voyage to Greenland where they have waged war on humanity ever since. In 2012, Sukkot was celebrated by the Jews on September 30-October 8. Coincidentally, the Roman ceremonies for Fides and the Tigillum Sororium are celebrated on October 1 while the Roman Ludi Augustales, which was established 14 AD after the death of Augustus and based on the Augustalia, is celebrated on October 3-12. The Leiunium Cereris, a day of Roman fasting in honor of Ceres is celebrated on October 4; the Roman mundus (tomb) was opened on October 5; and the Roman holy day entitled dies ater ("black day") to mark the anniversary of the battle of Arausio (105 BC) is celebrated on October 6; In 2012, Sukko also celebrated on October 7 which is coincidentally the same date that Rome celebrates the rites for the god of Jupiter which is represented by a lightning bolt and an eagle, the most common symbols of the Roman army. October 7 is also the same date that Rome celebrates the goddess of Juno which represents the fullness of vital force. In essence, Simchat Torah is a day which celebrates the endless cycle of war. In 2013, Sukkot is celebrated on September 18-28. Coincidentally, the Ludi Romani or Ludi Magni, "the oldest and most famous" of the Roman games, were held annually on September 5-19, while the “mercatus" and “Latona” set aside for markets and fairs commenced immediately following the Ludi Romani is celebrated on September 20–23.

Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

Abraham stretched out his hand and took the knife to slay his son.
But the angel of Yahweh called to him from heaven and said, “Abraham, Abraham!”
And he said, “Here I am.”
The angel said, “Do not stretch out your hand against the lad, and do nothing to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.” (Gen. 22:10-12)

If God hadn’t commented on this scene, then we could get away with pretending that Abraham didn’t really believe God would make him go through with it. But God’s response to Abraham’s actions gives us a clear view into Abraham’s heart. He had every intention of murdering his son in order to please his God. He wasn’t going to hold anything back, Covenant or no Covenant.

So what was the point of this traumatic ordeal which must have permanently damaged the trust between father and son? God has already told us what the point was.

“…for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.” (Gen. 22:12)

This whole thing was about correcting Abraham’s slipping priorities. Why was there ever a question that God wasn’t first in Abraham’s life? Because the promised child was becoming a bit too important in the old man’s eyes. God was starting to feel crowded, so He came up with a way to swiftly get Abraham back on track. By now, Abraham and God have a long personal history together. They have a solid bond. God isn’t about to let His little man slip away without a fight. When you’ve waited twenty-five years for God to give you a son you desperately want, it’s hard not to start obsessing. Abraham has already driven away his first son Ishmael for Isaac’s sake. Isaac is the shining star of the family—the heir to all of his father’s great wealth. No doubt he was spoiled rotten and probably a bit of a brat. But when God saw that Abraham was getting too attached to his son, He made His move. God wants to be first—totally first, not sharing the position with someone else. Isaac needed to be shoved way back from God’s throne in Abraham’s heart.

Personally destroying something you care about is a very powerful way to detach yourself from that thing. If I take a hammer to your phone, then you will think I was a jerk and fixate over the loss of something that was very important to you. But if you’re going to be the one who smashes your own possession, then a different mental process must take place. First you must choose to sever whatever heart bond you have formed with the object that you’re going to destroy. And once you make this mental shift, it’s never the same again. When Abraham looked at Isaac after God called off His test, he no longer saw someone he couldn’t stand to lose. Instead, he saw someone that he was willing to throw away for God’s sake. This ordeal had a very powerful, long-lasting effect on Abraham’s mind and soul. For Isaac, it had to have been extremely traumatic. A boy is going to be cautious about moving within dad’s reach again after he’s been seized and bound. No doubt there was a healthy distance between these two as they made the long journey home again. No doubt Isaac was extremely glad to run into his mother’s protective embrace. And yet the damaged trust would have only worked in Yahweh’s favor by preventing the previous bond of intimacy from being restored to its original strength.

Stephen A. Coston, Sr #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

"Royalty, Rumors and Racists"

BY STEPHEN A. COSTON, SR.

AUTHOR OF THE NEW BOOK:

KING JAMES
The VI Of Scotland & I Of England
Unjustly Accused?

The character assassination of His Majesty King James VI & I is an ongoing evolving process that has matured in this present day to a sort of "open season" of differing opinions variously setting forth different theories and hypotheses on the whys, hows, and ifs of the alleged "homosexuality" of King James VI & I. Part of the reason for so many differing opinions is that many historians and would-be historians have forsaken fact for fictional accounts on the life of King James VI & I. Without facts to restrain the imagination the investigative process turns into a rumor mill and as such is an aberration of the historical process. Often these highly speculative accounts, contemporary or modern, are based not on the actual life and words of King James VI & I but on what these individuals THINK what King James VI & I said and did meant. Honest professional historians are beginning to admit this and this is most welcome; however, King James VI & I still has his ardent critics.

More often than not even when actual facts of King James VI & I are presented they are subjected to interpretive twists designed to give the reader the impression that the words and deeds of King James VI & I support the allegations commonly leveled against him. Case in point, it is a known fact King James VI & I was handicapped from birth with weak limbs and injured himself many times. This caused him to have an unsteady gait. To compensate for this King James VI & I often leaned on his most trusted councilors and friends which also happened to be members of his personal staff, individuals critics freely term "favorites." It is often stated that "James was fond of leaning all over his beautiful young favorites" giving the reader the impression King James VI & I did so not because of a physical handicap but because of sexual attraction to same. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Further, it is also freely alleged that King James VI & I "passionately kissed" his "favorites" in public.

Critics of King James VI & I are fond of inferring from the above that King James VI & I engaged in the "French kissing" of his "favorites." They then use this assumption as yet another "proof" to support their contention that King James VI & I was indeed truly a "homosexual."

What the detractors of King James VI & I utterly fail to realize; however, (to their detriment) is the fact that the accounts responsible for popularizing this characterization were penned by individuals who hated not only King James VI & I as a Scot, but the whole country of Scotland as well. They were some of the most militant racists of the time of the most vicious type. Some of their contemporaries knew this and railed against them and defended King James VI & I and it is quite the mystery why modern critics seem not to know this.

Another point that critics of King James VI & I fail to recognize relative to this issue of kissing is that King James VI & I "slobbered" when he ate his food, consumed his drink, or even when he "kissed" someone's hand or cheek. Are we to infer then that King James VI & I passionately kissed inanimate objects, foods and drinks and bodily extremities? What about the widely accepted practice of a monarch's kiss at court to show the King's favor upon an individual? Besides that what of the British acceptance of public kissing for all kinds of events and circumstances. Are we then to infer that the whole island of Great Britain was a hot bed of homosexuality?

It is also inferred that because some individuals rejoiced to have King James VI & I's "legs soon in their arms" upon their return to court that this is somehow indicative of a reference to a sexual position. However, there exist many woodcuts depicting just this position of many noble and common men in with King James VI & I at court. It was customary to prostrate oneself at the feet of the monarch when allowed so close to His Majesty's person to receive a welcome, greeting or honor. King James VI & I's own son, the future King Charles I, himself was in just this position at the feet of his father when he returned from Spain. It is amazing that such shallow reasoning can be allowed to be pawned off as legitimate historical analysis.

Finally, much is made of King James VI & I articulating in his writing that he "loved" someone of the same gender giving the reader the mistaken belief that "love" stood for a sexual attraction and thus yet another "proof" of the "homosexuality" of King James VI & I. Also, it is alleged that King James VI & I "justified homosexuality many times" in his writings.

The most common offered "proof" of this mistaken assertion is a quotation from King James VI & I's speech to Parliament which is violently ripped from its intended meaning and context. For an in- depth refutation of this form of argument the diligent reader is referred to my book King James VI Of Scotland & I Of England - Unjustly Accused.

The Reverend Barrie Williams sums up the desperation of this reasoning:

"... there must be many besides myself for whom nine short words of the King are sufficient: 'Jesus had His John, and I have my George.' King James was in every estimate a devout protestant, and anyone who can believe that he would cast aspersions on the moral integrity of Our Saviour would have no difficulty in believing that the world is flat."

The sheer etymological ignorance of this type of argument is astounding! In my book King James VI Of Scotland & I Of England - Unjustly Accused I examine the widespread and commonly accepted practice of men and women writing to each other in loving terms and expressing their "love" for one another. Such Jacobean stylistic expressions of this kind were in no way indicative of sexual attraction or homosexuality.

I believe Lucius Annaeus Seneca said it best when he wrote:

"... they refute their case by means of the very passages which lead them to infer it."

Certain revisionist historians would have you believe otherwise and advocate the use this method to prove Biblical characters were likewise "homosexuals" to include Jesus Christ, David and Jonathan. These types of evidences, if you can call them that, are the types of things that critics of King James VI & I use to validate their claims. When they can't force King James VI & I to say what they want they simply make him "mean" what they want. Or, in other words, what they can't find stated they simply infer is there and place between the lines even though it is not "in the lines." However, if King James VI & I did not mean what he wrote then who is anyone to tell us what he actually meant?

As far as "witnesses" go, critics can only cite a handful of contemporaries of King James VI & I and most of these were men fired from office (sour grapes), or were political or religious enemies of the King, or they were otherwise disgruntled courtiers with an ax to grind and none ever were eye witness to any overt sexual acts on the part of King James VI & I.

Not only this but I have not found one yet that ever formally accused King James VI & I of directly being a homosexual and brought his case before any legal or religious body not to mention attempting to obey the precepts of Scripture in making such outlandish claims. For an in- depth examination of the charges commonly leveled at King James VI & I the careful reader is referred to my book mentioned previously.

It is obvious that myriad are the claims leveled at James Charles Stuart's (King James VI & I) moral character or lack thereof. However, out of this great sea of negative opinion the tide is fortunately turning away from the shores of libel and gossip and heading towards the calm home port of objectivity and evidentiary concerns.

Historians like the rest of our society are not immune from the influences of modern faddish trends and regrettably King James VI & I has suffered more than his share of diatribes that are directly due to a falling away from classical objective interpretive methods that were long indicative of the traditional historical method. Recent trends have captivated modern historians and led them to experiment with eisegetical techniques and to put it colloquially "tabloid style journalism." Therefore, much that has been written regarding His Majesty King James VI & I has not been the result of a balanced exegetical method.

Further complicating the situation and making matters worse has been the regrettable over reliance by historians on certain scurrilous sources that were produced in an era when libels of the Stuarts and the Monarchy were at a premium in general and whose opinions were motivated by a distrust and outright hostility to the noble Scots as a nation and King James VI & I in particular. King James VI & I being the first Scot to sit on the English throne and the natural father of the last Stuart King to reign in England before the regicide of The Royal Martyr, King Charles I, King James VI & I was naturally a prime target for abuse.

Making an easy target for his pursuit of peace and his many physical handicaps, King James VI & I was and is ill treated by many who venture to put pen to paper with a view to ruminating on the character of this much misunderstood Monarch. Like all of us in the course of King James VI & I's life he made enemies, and as king he had more than his share. Not only this but King James VI & I had to deal and overcome outright racism against his home of birth, Scotland. It is a sad fact that most of King James VI & I's contemporary critics were either disgruntled courtiers who were removed from office by King James VI & I himself or otherwise suffered loss of political or peerage advancement under King James VI & I or were haters of the whole Scottish nation!

Much indeed has been written on King James VI & I and because of this plethora of information a few researchers when doing analysis on King James VI & I simply refer back to past popular and easily obtainable sources rather than expending time and effort in obtaining rare and difficult to find first hand accounts of either the critical or ameliorative sources. Most indeed who have written about King James VI & I have never actually sat down to read what he actually wrote. This environment has created a prime climate for the kind of slanders and libels King James VI & I has been subjected to.

In my years of research on the life and character of King James VI & I, I have found that there is a great reluctance on the part of some of the more militant and bellicose of modern day critics of King James VI & I who claim to have facts to prove (beyond what they assert in their books) King James VI & I was a homosexual.

They seem unwilling to stand up to investigative criticism of their conclusions. They speak of research but balk at detailing the fruits thereof. They are fond of citing whole volumes of books and articles which they claim validate their assertions but refuse to justify any conclusions or data found therein. Some of the more extreme "Christian" critics of King James VI & I are extremely reticent about applying Biblical injunctions against gossip and rumor to their sources or even allow King James VI & I the protection of Scripture as found in Deut. 19:15 or I Tim. 5:19. Further, some are found to deny King James VI & I even professed to be a Christian! I find this extremely curious that such individuals who claim to be "Christians" would ignore Biblical injunctions on falsely accusing a brother and the evidentiary requirements to sustain charges of the type they advocate.

Thankfully, modern secular critical opinion on King James VI & I is reevaluating the negative assertions of his moral character and moderate critics of King James VI & I are now admitting that these charges are basically OPINION not historical facts! As noted above, only a few extremist and militant and the most ardent of King James VI & I's critics are espousing some of the most vociferous and invectively rancorous libels of King James VI & I.

I have also found in the course of my research a most curious phenomenon, that there is almost a total vacuum of consideration of what King James VI & I actually wrote or what he believed outside of a few brief excerpts of his writings which are more often than not stripped from their context or misinterpreted almost beyond recognition. Great weight almost to the point of complete dependence is attached to the writings of a few disgruntled courtiers, racists and bigots (Sir Anthony Weldon, Francis Osborne and Sir Edward Peyton and a few others).

The writings of Peter Heylyn, Sir William Sanderson, Bishop Godfrey Goodman and Anthony A. Wood and others (not to mention King James VI & I himself) are almost totally forsaken thus creating an unbalanced view of King James VI & I as viewed from contemporary accounts. Similarly, most modern works which discount the critical view of King James VI & I are also almost completely ignored by those who wish to paint King James VI & I as a homosexual.

When authors are unduly influenced by the scandal value of such poor sources they tend to rely on them in extreme and thus forsake detailed historical research and ignore the principles of evidentiary preponderance of evidence and thus sacrifice this for the propensity of our frail human nature in its attraction for dirt and scandal. Contradictory applications of principles and imbalanced research techniques can only result from a defective research method. Unfortunately this type of phenomenon has run rampant and caused many such evaluations to run amuck of the facts concerning King James VI & I.

I have not found any persons yet who libel King James VI & I as being a homosexual who are willing to allow themselves to be judged based on the same lines of evidence and principles upon which they unjustly convict King James VI & I .

All these factors coupled with the cultural and etymological ignorance prevailing in our day and the outright historical bias of some against King James VI & I have produced a situation where King James VI & I's accusers have played free with the actual historical facts and in some cases invented more ingenious eisegetical interpretations than any stretching of the imagination could ever produce. Thus the facts of history have been traded for the inventions of the imagination and regrettably there has of yet been no limitation to the unbridled attacks on the ever blessed memory and reputation of His Majesty, King James VI & I. When such pseudo-history is accepted for the real thing and we refuse to be bound to actual historical facts and opinions are masqueraded in place of reality then no valid conclusions can ever be reached.

In my attempts to request evidence that is commonly purported to exist by the sternest critics of King James VI & I sadly I have found that this evidence is often elusive and at best highly speculative. Instead what I have been offered in place of hard data from King James VI & I's militant and extremist critics is sarcasm, evasion, ridicule, rudeness and outright refusal to provide the requested information.

From King James VI & I's more mild critics they are at least recognizing the fact that their opinions have led to incorrect assumptions that accusations of homosexuality leveled at King James VI & I are factual, which they are not, and are based on speculation and opinion. Many are even willing to entertain the belief that King James VI & I might not have been homosexual at all. This is something that King James VI & I's hard line critics have yet to do and seem dead set against.

The personal slanders and racially motivated innuendoes and epithets were indicative more of the declarant's anti-Scottish bias and resultant dislike of King James VI & I than they were etiologically the result of actual facts. Thus, the scandalous artifacts which have been so carefully exhumed setting forth the "dirt" of the matter are in need not of study but of burial. These slurs are only allegorically and vaguely implying misdeeds on the part of King James VI & I in the most indirect manner and should be highly suspect. Often by their own account imagination played a key role in their assertions and this was based on their own particular interpretation (not provable facts) of the actions of King James VI & I. It is highly coincidental that the promoters of the charges were those who either bore no good will to the Scots or otherwise had a grudge to bear against their King. So, like irreverent grave robbers having no respect for the dead they attempt to steal that which does not belong to them and not content with desecrating the memory and honor of King James VI & I they also trample under foot his blessed memory. This ought not be so!

There seems to be a divergence of opinion amongst King James VI & I's critics. This is indicative of the fact that modern attitudes on King James VI & I are changing and the hard liners are refusing to budge. So far factual rebuttals of the hard line opponents of King James VI & I have had little effect as the pugnacious critics are refusing to yield to the actual evidence and are holding on to the rumors of the past. Such is the decline and decay of our society when we will allow the least of us, those who cannot defend themselves, to be thrown to the wolves if you will and be unjustly accused. In our passive acceptance of this injustice I see the fate of us all in that one day we may all find ourselves the target of false accusers. Where have moral and historical ethics gone!

The sheer bankruptcy of the critical case should be evident to any sincere lover of history. To those who will convict King James VI & I on the scantiest of evidence it must be seen that these individuals will thus embody the demise of all true history. The plethora of moral indictments and claims against King James VI & I's character are not historical facts but rather in all actuality primarily unjust criticisms which are commonly mistaken for facts.

Serious dialogue seems to have been relegated to the museum of ancient history and fallen into disuse. However, the criticisms of King James VI & I actually reveal more about our society's preoccupation with scandal and dirt than they do about the life and character of King James VI & I . We can no longer allow lopsided research to overpower the facts of history.

The best advise and observation on this sad situation ironically comes from King James VI & I himself. As His Majesty King James VI & I noted almost prophetically long ago:

"And principally exercise true wisdom in discerning wisely between true and false reports. First concerning the nature of the person reporter; next, what effect he can have in the well or evil of him whom of he maketh the report; thirdly, the likelihood of the purpose itself, and the last the nature and past life of the delated person ... "

And:

"They quarrel me (not for any evil or vice in me) but because I was a king, which they thought the highest evil, and because they were ashamed to profess this quarrel they were busy to look narrowly in all my actions, and I warrant you a moat in my eye, yes a false report was matter enough for them to work upon."

His Majesty King James VI & I,

Basilicon Doron

Gilad Atzmon #conspiracy thetruthseeker.co.uk

Why Nick Cohen is A Jew, Always Been A Jew. And You Will Never Be a Jew

Every few years, pro Iraq war and enthusiastic Ziocon Nick Cohen, insists upon declaring that he is becoming a Jew as if he weren’t a Jew to begin with. Back in 2009, Cohen used the Jewish Chronicle to announce: “Hatred Is Turning Me Into A Jew”. One would expect that the conversion would be compete by now but yesterday Cohen used the Guardian to repeat his lie. The Guardian headline read: “Why I’m becoming a Jew and why you should, too.”

Read a few lines and you grasp that Cohen isn’t just a Jew, he is a stereotypical Zionist Jew. He embodies every problematic symptom associated with Jewish ID politics.

Cohen tells us that it took him 40 years “to become a Jew.” He wants us to believe that the fact that his father’s family abandoned Judaism made him into a qualified‘Goy’. In truth, most Jews abandoned Judaism a while back. Zionism was largely a secular movement led by Jewish atheists. Cohen adds that his mother andgrandmother weren’t Jewish either.

A prominent Guardian writer is ought to know that contemporary Jewishness is defined byidentity and identification and Nick Cohen has always identified with Jewishness and far worse, with Zion and the Zionist militancy.

In order to determine whether Cohen is a Zionist Jew or an ordinary Goy all you have to do is to read his words, “Whenever I hear Jews announce their hatred of Israel’s very existence, I suspect that underneath their loud bombast lies a quiet plea to the Islamists and neo-Nazis…”

The attempt to split the Muslim world into ‘bad Islamists’ and ‘kosher Muslims’ is a blatant Zionist binary strategy that makes it legitimate to kill innocent Muslims in the name of Coca Cola or Israel’s security. Like Nick Cohen I also tend to distrust the anti Zionists Jews. However, in the real world, Jews who announce their ‘hatred of Israel’ are not afraid of Neo Nazis. They, in most cases, want to relieve themselves of any association with the colossal crimes committed by the Jewish State and the global wars advocated by Nick Cohen, David Aaronovitch and the Jewish Lobby. This is more than reasonable.

Maybe Nick Cohen doesn’t realise that Judaism is just one Jewish religion amongst many. Since their emancipation, Jews have subscribed collectively to many religions. At various stages, Jews have believed in Bolshevism, Zionism, Atheism, Egotism (a la Ayn Rand), Free Market (a la Milton Friedman) , Human Rights (for everyone except the Goyim), Moral interventionism and it is nowwidely accepted that the Holocaust has become the most popular Jewish religion. In fact for a preceptto become a ‘Jewish religion’ all it has to do is to a facilitate a sense of choseness or exceptionalism.

Now tell me, Nick Cohen the Atheist, the Zionist, advocate of Blair’s criminal war in Iraq, Jewish chronicle writer, the avid follower of the Holocaust religion who fights the Hitlers in the Labour Party24/7, is he not a Jew? You judge.

And what about you, would you like to ‘become a Jew’ like Nick Cohen? Nick Cohen believes you should. This is probably the only non-Jewish aspect in Cohen’s verbal masturbation. Jews do not invite people to join their club. They like to keep a certain level of exclusivity.

czakal #racist diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com

The second twist is Beinart’s inclusion of Biblical references to support his case.

Much Jewish sophistry intended for internal consumption contains lame Biblical references like these designed to lend the demands, which are fundamentally driven by Jewish ethnic self-interest, an air of moral plausibility and divine sanction. As with almost all Jewish sophistry, it falls apart on closer examination.

The three Biblical anecdotes Beinart cites to explain why Jews should be nice to immigrants are the episodes in which Abraham and his nephew Lot welcome strangers into their homes and one in which Abraham resides temporarily in Egypt. Here are the relevant portions of his article.

The worst anti-Semitic attack in American history occurred while Jews around the world were reading the Torah portion that tells the story of Lot, an immigrant.
Lot moves to Sodom, and prospers there. The Midrash says he becomes a judge. His daughters intermarry with the locals. Then one day, while sitting at the gates of the city, the assimilating immigrant sees two strangers approach. He asks them to “spend the night and bathe your feet”— the Midrash says he learned to welcome strangers from his uncle Abraham, the first Jew. Lot “prepares them a feast.”

But in Sodom, the natives hate strangers. “Where are the men who came to you tonight?” they demand. “Bring them out to us.” Lot tries to protect his guests. “I beg you friends,” he implores, “do not commit such a wrong.” For the men of Sodom, however, this just underscores Lot’s foreignness. He hasn’t really assimilated; he isn’t one of them. He’s a threat. “The fellow came here an immigrant and already acts the ruler,” they declare. “Now we will deal worse with you than with them.”

…As Parsha Vayera suggests, welcoming the stranger is among the most fundamental Jewish imperatives. Lot “baked unleavened” bread for the strangers who came to Sodom. The parallel to the exodus from Egypt is clear. Lot and Abraham welcomed strangers; Pharaoh oppressed them. And 36 times in the Torah Jews are reminded to be like Abraham and Lot: To remember the heart of the stranger because were strangers in the land of Egypt.

In Abraham’s case, the guests tell Abraham that his wife, Sarah, shall bear him a child, even though she is old.

In Lot’s case, the guests shepherd Lot and his family out of the city, Sodom, so they can escape its impending destruction.

According to Beinart, this proves that good things happen to Jews when they are nice to strangers.

Now let’s proceed to a critical examination of these claims.

First, Abraham had left his place of origin, Ur, and entered someone else’s country, Canaan, which, as their names suggests, belonged to the Canaanites.

Abraham and the Lord (the projected image of the Jewish tribal ego) planned to dispossess the Canaanites of their land.

“The Canaanite was then in the land”. This phrase, or variants of it, appear several times in the Biblical text. They, of course, imply that the Canaanites are no longer in their land at the time the Bible was written, because they have been dispossessed and destroyed by the Jews.

When Canaan experienced a famine, Abram and his wife “sojourned” in Egypt. Abraham told his wife, Sarai, to pretend she was his sister so he could pimp her out as a marriage prospect to the local Egyptian notables. (Genesis 12)

Both Sarai and Abram (their names became Sarah and Abraham later) were well treated by the Pharaoh.

The Pharaoh, however, found that his land was soon tormented by plagues. When he inquired into the reasons for this, he learned that Sarai was Abram’s wife, not his sister, and the “Lord” was punishing him for this. Even then, after discovering that the proto-Jew Abram had grossly and basely deceived him, the Pharaoh doesn’t harm him but permits him to go peaceably on his way, even allowing him to retain the riches he had acquired.

Let’s come now to the anecdotes in Genesis 18 & 19 where Abraham and Lot are nice to “strangers” and arrange for them to be given food and shelter.

Abraham knew that the guests were not normal guests, but were somehow mystical emissaries of God. He surely doesn’t deserve much moral credit, then, for choosing to be nice to them.

It’s not clear from the Biblical text whether Lot also knew his guests were mystical emissaries of God although there is a hint that he did. In any case, when he welcomes them into his house, the people of the town crowd round about, asking to have a look at them. Lot refuses to let them and, bizarrely, offers his daughters up to be gang-raped in order to protect the immigrants.

The townspeople decline this offer and insist on having a look at the “guests”. Their suspicion is entirely justified because the guests are there to destroy the city and, in fact, do destroy it the following day. The Jews welcomed in and sheltered the “immigrants” (angels) who ultimately destroyed the city, killing all of its inhabitants except the Jews.

All three of the Biblical anecdotes referenced by Beinart have the following elements in common:
* Jews enter a land that isn’t theirs.
* In contrast to what Beinart implies, they are initially welcomed and well-treated by the locals.
* In the course of time, the behaviour of the Jews arouses suspicion and anger.
* Jews then bring ruin upon the original inhabitants of the land they have entered. To the Canaanites they bring death and dispossession. To the Egyptians, they bring plague. To the inhabitants of Sodom (Sodomites!), they bring complete annihilation.

In every case, the local people who were nice to the Jews and accepted them as immigrants or refugees are ultimately harmed or destroyed by them and their vicious God.
Beinart thinks this proves that Jews should be nice to immigrants. I think it proves Gentiles should be suspicious of Jews.

Sue Bohlin #fundie probe.org

Sue Bohlin looks a common myths concerning homosexual behavior that are prevalent in our society. These myths prevent us from looking at homosexuality with a biblical worldview and from dealing with this sin in a loving and consistent manner.

In this essay we’ll be looking at some of the homosexual myths that have pervaded our culture, and hopefully answering their arguments. Much of this material is taken from Joe Dallas’ excellent book, A Strong Delusion: Confronting the “Gay Christian” Movement.{1} While the information in this essay may prove helpful, it is our prayer that you will be able to share it calmly and compassionately, remembering that homosexuality isn’t just a political and moral issue; it is also about people who are badly hurting.

10% of the Population Is Homosexual.

In 1948, Dr. Alfred Kinsey released a study called Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, claiming that between 10 and 47% of the male population was homosexual.{2} He got his figures from a pool of 5,300 male subject that he represented as your average “Joe College” student. Many of the men who gave him the data, though, actually consisted of sex offenders, prisoners, pimps, hold-up men, thieves, male prostitutes and other criminals, and hundreds of gay activists.{3} The 10% figure was widely circulated by Harry Hay, the father of the homosexual “civil rights” movement, urging that homosexuality be seen no longer as an act of sodomy but as a 10% minority class.{4}

Kinsey’s figures were exposed as completely false immediately afterwards, and by many other scientists since. The actual figure is closer to 2-3%.{5} But the 10% number has been so often reported in the press that most people think it’s valid. It’s not.

People Are Born Gay.

Ann Landers said it, and millions of people believe it. The problem is, the data’s not there to support it. There are three ways to test for inborn traits: twin studies, brain dissections, and gene “linkage” studies.{6} Twin studies show that something other than genetics must account for homosexuality, because nearly half of the identical twin studied didn’t have the same sexual preference. If homosexuality were inherited, identical twins should either be both straight or both gay. Besides, none of the twin studies have been replicated, and other twin studies have produced completely different results.{7} Dr. Simon LeVay’s famous study on the brains of dead subjects yielded questionable results regarding its accuracy. He wasn’t sure of the sexual orientation of the people in the study, and Dr. LeVay even admits he doesn’t know if the changes in the brain structures were the cause *of* homosexuality, or caused *by* homosexuality.{8} Finally, an early study attempting to show a link between homosexuality and the X-chromosome has yet to be replicated, and a second study actually contradicted the findings of the first.{9} Even if homosexuality were someday proven to be genetically related, *inborn* does not necessarily mean *normal*. Some children are born with cystic fibrosis, but that doesn’t make it a normal condition.

Inborn tendencies toward certain behaviors (such as homosexuality) do not make those behaviors moral. Tendencies toward alcoholism, obesity, and violence are now thought to be genetically influenced, but they are not good behaviors. People born with tendencies toward these behaviors have to fight hard against their natural temptations to drunkenness, gluttony, and physical rage.

And since we are born as sinners into a fallen world, we have to deal with the consequences of the Fall. Just because we’re born with something doesn’t mean it’s normal. It’s not true that “God makes some people gay.” All of us have effects of the Fall we need to deal with.

What’s Wrong with Two Loving, Committed Men or Women Being Legally Married?

There are two aspects to marriage: the legal and the spiritual. Marriage is more than a social convention, like being “best friends” with somebody, because heterosexual marriage usually results in the production of children. Marriage is a legal institution in order to offer protection for women and children. Women need to have the freedom to devote their time and energies to be the primary nurturers and caretakers of children without being forced to be breadwinners as well. God’s plan is that children grow up in families who provide for them, protect them, and wrap them in security.

Because gay or lesbian couples are by nature unable to reproduce, they do not need the legal protection of marriage to provide a safe place for the production and raising of children. Apart from the sexual aspect of a gay relationship, what they have is really “best friend” status, and that does not require legal protection.

Of course, a growing number of gay couples are seeking to have a child together, either by adoption, artificial insemination, or surrogate mothering. Despite the fact that they have to resort to an outside procedure in order to become parents, the presence of adults plus children in an ad hoc household should not automatically secure official recognition of their relationship as a family. There is a movement in our culture which seeks to redefine “family” any way we want, but with a profound lack of discernment about the long-term effects on the people involved. Gay parents are making a dangerous statement to their children: lesbian mothers are saying that fathers are not important, and homosexual fathers are saying that mothers are not important. More and more social observers see the importance of both fathers and mothers in children’s lives; one of their roles is to teach boys what it means to be a boy and teach girls what it means to be a girl.

The other aspect of marriage is of a spiritual nature. Granted, this response to the gay marriage argument won’t make any difference to people who are unconcerned about spiritual things, but there are a lot of gays who care very deeply about God and long for a relationship with Him. The marriage relationship, both its emotional and especially its sexual components, is designed to serve as an earthbound illustration of the relationship between Christ and His bride, the church.{10} Just as there is a mystical oneness between a man and a woman, who are very different from each other, so there is a mystical unity between two very different, very “other” beings–the eternal Son of God and us mortal, creaturely humans. Marriage as God designed it is like the almost improbable union of butterfly and buffalo, or fire and water. But homosexual relationships are the coming together of two like individuals; the dynamic of unity and diversity in heterosexual marriage is completely missing, and therefore so is the spiritual dimension that is so intrinsic to the purpose of marriage. Both on an emotional and a physical level, the sameness of male and male, or female and female, demonstrates that homosexual relationships do not reflect the spiritual parable that marriage is meant to be. God wants marriage partners to complement, not to mirror, each other. The concept of gay marriage doesn’t work, whether we look at it on a social level or a spiritual one.

Jesus Said Nothing about Homosexuality.

Whether from a pulpit or at a gay rights event, gay activists like to point out that Jesus never addressed the issue of homosexuality; instead, He was more interested in love. Their point is that if Jesus didn’t specifically forbid a behavior, then who are we to judge those who engage in it?

This argument assumes that the Gospels are more important than the rest of the books in the New Testament, that only the recorded sayings of Jesus matter. But John’s gospel itself assures us that it is not an exhaustive record of all that Jesus said and did, which means there was a lot left out!{11} The gospels don’t record that Jesus condemned wife-beating or incest; does that make them OK? Furthermore, the remaining books of the New Testament are no less authoritative than the gospels. All scripture is inspired by God, not just the books with red letters in the text. Specific prohibitions against homosexual behavior in Romans 1:26-27 and 1 Corinthians 6:9,10 are every bit as God-ordained as what is recorded in the gospels.

We do know, however, that Jesus spoke in specific terms about God’s created intent for human sexuality: “From the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; and the two shall be one flesh. . . What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder” (Matt. 19:4-6). God’s plan is holy heterosexuality, and Jesus spelled it out.

The Levitical laws against homosexual behavior are not valid today.

Leviticus 18:22 says, “Thou shalt not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; it is an abomination.” Gay theologians argue that the term “abomination” is generally associated with idolatry and the Canaanite religious practice of cult prostitution, and thus God did not prohibit the kind of homosexuality we see today.

Other sexual sins such as adultery and incest are also prohibited in the same chapters where the prohibitions against homosexuality are found. All sexual sin is forbidden by both Old and New Testament, completely apart from the Levitical codes, because it is a moral issue. It is true that we are not bound by the rules and rituals in Leviticus that marked Yahweh’s people by their separation from the world; however, the nature of sexual sin has not changed because immorality is an affront to the holiness and purity of God Himself. Just because most of Leviticus doesn’t apply to Christians today doesn’t mean none of it does.

The argument that the word “abomination” is connected with idolatry is well answered by examining Proverbs 6:16-19, which describes what else the Lord considers abominations: a proud look, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises evil imaginations, feet that are swift in running to mischief, a false witness that speaks lies, and a man who sows discord among brothers. Idolatry plays no part in these abominations. The argument doesn’t hold water.

If the practices in Leviticus 18 and 20 are condemned because of their association with idolatry, then it logically follows that they would be permissible if they were committed apart from idolatry. That would mean incest, adultery, bestiality, and child sacrifice (all of which are listed in these chapters) are only condemned when associated with idolatry; otherwise, they are allowable. No responsible reader of these passages would agree with such a premise.{12}

Calling Homosexuality a Sin Is Judging, and Judging Is a Sin.

Josh McDowell says that the most often-quoted Bible verse used to be John 3:16, but now that tolerance has become the ultimate virtue, the verse we hear quoted the most is “Judge not, lest ye be judged” (Matt. 7:1). The person who calls homosexual activity wrong is called a bigot and a homophobe, and even those who don’t believe in the Bible can be heard to quote the “Judge not” verse.

When Jesus said “Do not judge, or you too will be judged,” the context makes it plain that He was talking about setting ourselves up as judge of another person, while blind to our own sinfulness as we point out another’s sin. There’s no doubt about it, there is a grievous amount of self-righteousness in the way the church treats those struggling with the temptations of homosexual longings. But there is a difference between agreeing with the standard of Scripture when it declares homosexuality wrong, and personally condemning an individual because of his sin. Agreeing with God about something isn’t necessarily judging.

Imagine I’m speeding down the highway, and I get pulled over by a police officer. He approaches my car and, after checking my license and registration, he says, “You broke the speed limit back there, ma’am.” Can you imagine a citizen indignantly leveling a politically correct charge at the officer: “Hey, you’re judging me! Judge not, lest ye be judged!'” The policeman is simply pointing out that I broke the law. He’s not judging my character, he’s comparing my behavior to the standard of the law. It’s not judging when we restate what God has said about His moral law, either. What is sin is to look down our noses at someone who falls into a different sin than we do. That’s judging.

The Romans 1 Passage on Homosexuality Does Not Describe True Homosexuals, but Heterosexuals Who Indulge in Homosexual Behavior That Is Not Natural to Them.

Romans 1:26-27 says, “God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.” Some gay theologians try to get around the clear prohibition against both gay and lesbian homosexuality by explaining that the real sin Paul is talking about here is straight people who indulge in homosexual acts, because it’s not natural to them. Homosexuality, they maintain, is not a sin for true homosexuals.

But there is nothing in this passage that suggests a distinction between “true” homosexuals and “false” ones. Paul describes the homosexual behavior itself as unnatural, regardless of who commits it. In fact, he chooses unusual words for men and women, Greek words that most emphasize the biology of being a male and a female. The behavior described in this passage is unnatural for males and females; sexual orientation isn’t the issue at all. He is saying that homosexuality is biologically unnatural; not just unnatural to heterosexuals, but unnatural to anyone.

Furthermore, Romans 1 describes men “inflamed with lust” for one another. This would hardly seem to indicate men who were straight by nature but experimenting with gay sex.{13} You really have to do some mental gymnastics to make Romans 1 anything other than what a plain reading leads us to understand all homosexual activity is sin.

Preaching Against Homosexuality Causes Gay Teenagers to Commit Suicide.

I received an e-mail from someone who assured me that the blood of gay teenagers was on my hands because saying that homosexuality is wrong makes people kill themselves. The belief that gay teenagers are at high risk for suicide is largely inspired by a 1989 report by a special federal task force on youth and suicide. This report stated three things; first, that gay and lesbian youths account for one third of all teenage suicides; second, that suicide is the leading cause of death among gay teenagers, and third, gay teens who commit suicide do so because of “internalized homophobia” and violence directed at them.{14} This report has been cited over and over in both gay and mainstream publications.

San Francisco gay activist Paul Gibson wrote this report based on research so shoddy that when it was submitted to Dr. Louis Sullivan, the former Secretary of Health and Human Services, Dr. Sullivan officially distanced himself and his department from it.{15} The report’s numbers, both its data and its conclusions, are extremely questionable. Part of the report cites an author claiming that as many as 3,000 gay youths kill themselves each year. But that’s over a thousand more than the total number of teen suicides in the first place! Gibson exaggerated his numbers when he said that one third of all teen suicides are committed by gay youth. He got this figure by looking at gay surveys taken at drop- in centers for troubled teens, many of which were gay-oriented, which revealed that gay teens had two to four times the suicidal tendencies of straight kids. Gibson multiplied this higher figure by the disputed Kinsey figure of a 10% homosexual population to produce his figure that 30% of all youth suicides are gay. David Shaffer, a Columbia University psychiatrist who specializes in teen suicides, pored over this study and said, “I struggled for a long time over Gibson’s mathematics, but in the end, it seemed more hocus-pocus than math.”{16}

The report’s conclusions are contradicted by other, more credible reports. Researchers at the University of California-San Diego interviewed the survivors of 283 suicides for a 1986 study. 133 of those who died were under 30, and only 7 percent were gay and they were all over 21. In another study at Columbia University of 107 teenage boy suicides, only three were known to be gay, and two of those died in a suicide pact. When the Gallup organization interviewed almost 700 teenagers who knew a teen who had committed suicide, not one mentioned sexuality as part of the problem. Those who had come close to killing themselves mainly cited boy-girl problems or low self-esteem.{17}

Gibson didn’t use a heterosexual control group in his study. Conclusions and statistics are bound to be skewed without a control group. When psychiatrist David Shaffer examined the case histories of the gay teens who committed suicides in Gibson’s report, he found the same issues that straight kids wrestle with before suicide: “The stories were the same: a court appearance scheduled for the day of the death; prolonged depression; drug and alcohol problems; etc.”{18}

That any teenager experiences so much pain that he takes his life is a tragedy, regardless of the reason. But it’s not fair to lay the responsibility for gay suicides, the few that there are, on those who agree with God that it’s wrong and harmful behavior.

David J. Stewart #fundie #racist #sexist #homophobia #wingnut #conspiracy #pratt jesus-is-savior.com

I don't condemn anyone, for the Bible condemns all of us as guilty, dirty, rotten, hell-deserving sinners. My salvation solely rests in Christ's righteousness, because of the precious blood that He gave for our sins. My intention is not to be unkind; but rather, to expose King's false teachings and Communist agenda.

Martin Luther King Jr.'s real birth name was Michael King Jr. Although his father later decided to rename Michael to “Martin Luther” King Jr. (after martin Luther the reformer), there was never any legal name change. Michael King Jr. was born and died as Michael King Jr.

Christianity Today promotes Communist Martin Luther King Jr. According to ChristianityToday, “No Christian played a more prominent role in the century's most significant social justice movement.” This is tragic! Few Christians are aware of the evils of Martin Luther King Jr. — King was an IMPOSTER as you will see clearly in this article. To no surprise, ChristianityToday also promotes Rock Music, Witchcraft, Homosexuality and Satanism. Billy Graham is the organization's founder. In 1965, the so-called “reverend” Martin Luther King Jr. did a Playboy (that's right, Hugh Hefner's Playboy empire of sexual lasciviousness, adultery and smut) interview with Alex Haley. No pastor worth his salt would ever do a Playboy interview. Shame on Mr. King!

Here are some facts about Martin Luther King Jr. that you won't hear from the liberal, leftist, mainstream newsmedia . . .

1. Martin Luther King Jr. was NO born-again Christian. King propagated a social Gospel of ecumenism (which is still strongly followed today by African Americans), but King certainly did NOT preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ. In his writings, King openly denied Christ's virgin birth, deity and bodily resurrection (effectively making King an atheist). Sadly, King is burning in the fires of Hell this very minute!!!

2. Martin Luther King Jr. was NO Baptist Preacher. Many of King's doctrines were way out in left field. As mentioned, he denied the bodily resurrection of Christ, Jesus deity, the virgin birth and believed that spirituality could be gained through “religious experience” as he termed it. King did not hold to the historical orthodox Baptist positions.

3. The “social justice” which Christianity Today praises was nothing less than a continued Communist conspiracy to destabilize America. This "social justice" has spawned feminism, homosexuality, gay-marriage, abortion, and a host of other evils in America. Freedom without moral restraint is no freedom at all and can only lead to certain bondage. The social justice which King propagated was not just a fight for equality amongst African Americans, but was largely a campaign to morally bankrupt America. Communism found a willing servant in Martin Luther King Jr. Today, America is largely Communist. Unbeknownst to most Americans, Karl Marx's 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto have been fulfilled already in America. For example, the 10th plank called for the creation of a public school system. The 5th plank called for a central bank. Communism's ultimate goal is the total destruction of America's sovereignty, economy, land ownership rights, Bill of Rights, U.S. Constitution, and Christianity.

Braveheart #racist stormfront.org

It's a Wonderful Race, After All

by James Bronson (part 1)

There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites throughout history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed peoples."

George's dad was shocked to hear such talk. "Who put such commie-pinko nonsense into your head, boy? Did one of your sandal-wearing hippie college professors teach you that?" the father asked.

To which the son replied: "That's the truth dad. My anthropology professor, Dr. Irving Silverstein, says so. He ought to know. Dr. Silverstein is a well-respected Ph.D. People of your generation just don't understand because you were raised in a White supremacist, racist society. That's why I've come to admire Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King as the greatest man in American history. He stood up to the racists of your generation. Because of him, my generation of White kids is completely color blind."

The father angrily replied: "That's bull****! I've always been fair-minded and tolerant of people from all backgrounds and races. I haven't 'oppressed' anybody, and furthermore there's nothing wrong with being proud of one's own people, including the European race of people. Your race is in your blood. It's like an extension of your biological family and you ought to be proud of your European heritage and identity, just like every other racial group in America is proud of its. Why is it OK for them to have a strong sense of racial
identity but it's evil for us Europeans to feel that way?"

The young "intellectual" laughed at his father. "Come on dad, that's the kind of crap Hitler tried to peddle. Those racist attitudes were discredited years ago. There's only one race and that's the human race. Diversity is our greatest strength. Differences in so-called "race" are as insignificant as differences in belly buttons. And besides, UN statistics now show that low White birth rates, along with the fact that we live in an multicultural society, will mean that Europeans and their ethnocentrist and racist culture will have died out by the end of the century," young George said.

Turning red with anger, the father yelled: "You are a walking cliché, you know that, boy? And you think it's a good thing that the European peoples of the world will have faded out and ceased to exist?" Young George replied; "I think it's great! It will mean the end of racism and the end of hate. The oppressed peoples of the world would have been better off if us racist Europeans had never existed to begin with."

Suddenly there was a blast of cold wind, an explosion, and a huge smoke cloud. When the smoke had settled, George found himself alone and lost in a cold open field.

An angel named Clarence then appeared to him and said "Well George, you've got your wish."

George asked: "Where am I? What's going on here? And who are you?"

The angel answered, "George, I'm Clarence the Angel. I was sent here to show you what the world would have been like if Europeans, or Whites, had never existed. You now live in a world where Europeans never existed."

"Oh. That's cool. I'll have no problem adapting because there's not a racist bone in my body. And when I get back to my world, I'll be able to tell my professor and my friends how great this non-racist world was. Say, I'm freezing my ass off out here. Where's the nearest motel?"

"Motel?" replied the angel. "There are no motels here in what was once called North America. But there are some caves up in those mountains where you can find shelter."

"Caves? No way, man. I want a nice warm bed to sleep in."

"I don't think you understand George. There are no buildings here in non-white America because the evil Europeans never came here to build them. Whites never existed, remember? The natives live in tents. Would you like to go meet some local Indians? Perhaps they'll let you stay in a tent."

"A tent? But it's 10 degrees outside?...Oh well. It's better than a cave I suppose. Let's go talk to these Indians...... Wait a second, are these Indians friendly or hostile?"

"Why, George, that's a racist question to ask. Just because some Indians were brutal savages who scalped their victims alive, it doesn't mean they all were", said the angel sarcastically.

"I know that Clarence. And I'm not a racist. I hate racism. Nonetheless, I'd feel safer if I could have a gun to defend myself if they turn out to be violent."

"Gun?" replied the angel. "There are no guns for you to defend yourself with. Firearms were invented by evil Europeans. Though, we could make a spear with those twigs over there…"

"That's too much work. Give me a telephone then. I'll call the Indians to ask if it's OK."

"Telephone"? replied the angel. There are no telephones here. Alexander Graham Bell was another evil white man, so he never existed. No Europeans remember?" "Forget it then," replied George. "I'll sleep in the damn cave."

Upon arriving at the cave, a shivering George asked the angel for a lighter so that he could light a fire. "A lighter?" replied Clarence. "There are no lighters here, and no matches. Those are European gadgets and evil Europeans never existed remember? If you want to get warm, you need to do like the locals do and start rubbing twigs together."

"Oh come on man! You mean to tell me these people still rub sticks together for fire?"

"That's right George. The Indians live exactly as they did before the evil pilgrims arrived from Europe just a few centuries ago." said the angel sarcastically.

"I refuse to stay in this cold cave and I damn sure ain't gonna light a fire with twigs, and I refuse to sleep in a teepee. I'll go to South America. I can make it in a warmer climate and I'll adapt quickly to the great Incan civilization I learned about at college. Since European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed, the Incans will still be there... I need a car"

"Car?" replied the angel. "There are no cars here. Daimler and Benz, the evil German inventors of the internal combustion engine, were never born...nor was Henry Ford. There are no paved roads either. This is a world without evil Europeans remember?"

"No cars! Oh. I'll just have to take a train."

"There are no trains in this world either George. Evil Europeans weren't here to build locomotive engines or to discover the many uses of coal, oil and gas, or to build trains or lay tracks. But I'll allow you to cheat just a bit. Grab hold of my magic robe and we'll fly
south."

George touched the angel's robe and they flew south until they arrived in an abandoned mud hut in the midst of Incan territory. George was grateful for the warm weather but it wasn't long until he began to complain about the heat and humidity.

"Clarence, this hut is a little ****hole and I'm sweating up a storm here. Get me an air-conditioner…please!"

"Air-conditioner?" replied the angel. "There are no air-conditioners here. Air conditioning and refrigeration were inventions created by evil White men."

"What?!! You mean to tell me that in the year 2003 these people still haven't figured out a way to keep themselves or their food cool?” a frustrated George asked.

"No George, they haven't. And they never will."

"This is ridiculous. Let's go to the main city to see the Emperor. I can't live like this. Where's a car...oh I forget...no cars! Dammit I'll walk. Let's go."

After walking through the jungle for about an hour or so, it began to get dark. George then asked Clarence to give him a flashlight so that he could see. "Flashlight? Sorry George, but Thomas Edison was an evil White man too...and he was never born. There are some branches over there if you want to make a torch."

"Never mind that!" George shouted back.

By morning time, Clarence and George had arrived at the temple of the Incans. A bloody human sacrifice was in progress. George turned to Clarence and cried, "They're going to butcher that poor soul! Somebody has got to stop this. What horrible murdering beasts! Can't anyone stop them?"

The angel replied "I'm afraid not. Ritual killings are common place here.” Those evil European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed so the Incans just continued their brutal ways. In fact, it was the oppressed peoples themselves who made up the bulk of the Spanish armed forces. The people saw the Spaniards as liberators who would rid them of the oppressive Incan and Mayan rulers and give them a better life."

"I can't blame them for helping the Spaniards then. This is a horrible place. Get me out of this ****hole now!" said George.

'Where would you like to go?" Clarence replied.

George said: "Take me to Africa, maybe there's a more advanced and humane civilization there that I can fit into. Where’s the nearest airport?"

"Oh, I forgot...no Wright Brothers." George said. "How about a boat?"

"Boats?" replied the angel. "I'm afraid the most seaworthy rafts available to you won't be of much help in crossing the vast Atlantic Ocean. The great Viking sailors and European navigators never existed. No Phoenicians, no Leif Eriksson, no Henry the Navigator, no Columbus, no Magellan, no Hudson and no Robert Fulton. Even if you could build your own ship, there would be no compass for you to navigate with and no sextant either. I'm afraid you're stuck here George."

"Can I touch your robe and fly to Africa then" asked George.

"You're cheating again George, but all right. Touch my robe and we'll fly to Africa."

When they arrived in Africa, George saw thousands of half-naked African tribesmen being herded along a dirt path. They were guarded by other Africans with spears. "What are they doing to those poor men?" George asked Clarence.

"They are being enslaved by another tribe. Slavery was common in Africa long before the whites arrived," Clarence said. "In fact, most of the slaves who were shipped to the Americas were sold to the slave traders by African tribal leaders."

"That's so sad,” George said. "I want to meet Martin Luther King. Since his White assassin never existed, this great man should still be alive. He's probably a great tribal chief somewhere and leader of an advanced civilization. He will free these slaves from their African masters. Take me to him, Clarence."

Clarence led George to a little hut deep in the heart of Africa. The naked women and children looked at George in wonder. The young men were out on a hunt but the older men stayed behind. George was led to the dingy little hut of the tribal witchdoctor and spiritual leader. There he saw a wild-looking man with a necklace of teeth around his neck and a huge ring pierced through his nose. "What the hell is that?” George asked.

"Meet Witch-doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga" Clarence said. He never became Reverend Martin Luther King because there were no universities or seminaries built to educate him. Europeans weren't there to create such opportunities. But he did become the tribe's spiritual leader. He specializes in casting evil spells. Perhaps he can help you?"

The witch doctor gazed in wonder at George. Then he motioned to his henchmen to seize young George. The tribesmen grabbed hold of George and tied him to a nearby tree.

"Stop it! Let me go. What are they going to do to me?" cried George hysterically.

"They're going to perform a ritual killing on you, George. The good doctor King...I mean Kinga -- believes that by cutting your heart out while you are still alive, it will bring good fortune and fertility to his tribe," laughed Clarence.

"Clarence! Clarence! Help me Clarence! Help me!

"But George, you told me that you wanted to go to Africa and to meet your hero Reverend King."

George said: "This part of Africa has not developed yet. I can see that now. Take me to North Africa where Egypt and Carthage established great civilizations. Just get me out of here, please."

Just as the witch doctor's spear was about to carve out George's heart, George vanished into thin air. He then found himself on the banks of the river Nile in Egypt.

"Thank you Clarence. Thank you," George said. "I don't understand it Clarence. Why does so much of the world remain so brutal and primitive? I learned during Black History Month about many talented black inventors and scientists. Garrett Morgan, George Washington Carver, Benjamin Banneker, Granville Woods. Then there's Dr. Carson, the preeminent brain surgeon in all of America. Where are these men?"

Clarence replied: "Don't you understand yet? America, and Africa, exist exactly as they did before the Europeans discovered them. Civilization as you had known it had only been introduced to these people just a few centuries ago by the Europeans. There are no universities, no hospitals, no means of transportation other than animals, no science, no medicine, no machines. In fact, the wheel hasn't even been discovered in Sub-Saharan Africa! Those black scientists, inventors, doctors, athletes, and entertainers you speak of were never given the opportunity to realize their full human potential because Europeans weren't around to introduce higher civilization and learning to them. There are no George Washington Carvers in this non-European world, no Dr. Carsons, no Booker T. Washingtons, no Benjamin Bannekers, no Michael Jordans, no Oprah Winfreys, no Bill Cosbys, no..."

"Stop it! That can't be!" cried George. "Let's walk over to the great pyramids of Egypt right now and I'll show you one of the great wonders of the world ...built by non-Whites"

They walked a few miles before George stopped and asked where the nearest toilet was. "Toilets?" replied the angel. There are no toilets or urinals in this world. Plumbing was developed by evil Europeans. The people in this non-White world still relieve themselves in open fields."

Clarence turned around so George could do his business. "I need some toilet paper." George said.

"Toilet paper?" replied the angel. "There..."

"I know. I know. Toilet paper hasn't been invented yet. Just hand me a rag then".

Clarence obliged and the two of them went on their way.

Oboehner #fundie disqus.com

(continuing to deny evolution)

"What I have are facts." "Evolution explains how living things change over a long time" A time noboby observed, they BELIEVE that's how it happened - faith, as there are NO FACTS proving that's what happened. A cow slowly turning into a whale is just a fairytale.

"We know that living things have changed over time, because we can see their remains in the rocks. These remains are called 'fossils'." Hardly, you have faith that whatever you see is not merely an extinct or undiscovered creature, you can't even prove it procreated let alone "evolved" into anything.
"S o we know that the animals and plants of today are..." No you BELIEVE that's what happened - faith again. It's not proven by anything.

Evolutionism shoves any "evidence" into a preconceived box, and whatever doesn't fit is tossed out. Two people are in a room and suddenly it goes dark, the evolutionist would claim the other person in the room turned the light out completely ignoring any other possibilities because they are so emotionally vested in believing it could never be the bulb that burned out.

Yet again exploding dot boy/girl/whatever, ad hominem attacks o n others STILL doesn't prove your religion.

You website is a laughable joke, "Facts" "This is very strong evidence..." hardly a fact.
1. The universal genetic code. Could also be "very strong evidence" of a common designer.
2. The fossil record. I covered that, no proof there.
3. Genetic commonalities. See number 1.
4. Common traits in embryos. "all these life forms have gill slits" FRAUD ALERT, it's folds of skin, humans never had and never will have "gill slits" And they call that crap "science".
5. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Yet it's still bacteria which revert back to their original state when the adaptation is no longer needed. If anything it's proof evolution NEVER happened.
What else do you have?

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

The curtain is now being pulled back to fully expose the Khazarian Mafia and it’s evil plan to infiltrate, tyrannize the whole World and eradicate all Abrahamic Religions and allow only their Babylonian Talmudism also known as Luciferianism, Satanism or ancient Baal worship.

by Preston James and Mike Harris- SEE VETERANS TODAY 50% RULE

Note: The history of the Khazarians, specifically the Khazarian Mafia (KM), the World’s largest Organized Crime Syndicate that the Khazarian oligarchy morphed into by their deployment of Babylonian Money-Magick, has been nearly completely excised from the history books.

The present day Khazarian Mafia (KM) knows that it cannot operate or exist without abject secrecy and therefore has spent a lot of money having its history excised from the history books in order to prevent citizens of the World from learning about its “Evil beyond imagination” that empowers this World’s largest Organized Crime Cabal. The authors of this article have done their best to resurrect this lost, secret history of the Khazarians and their large International Organized Crime Syndicate best referred to as the Khazarian Mafia (KM) and make this history available to the World via the Internet, the new Gutenberg Press.

It has been exceedingly difficult to reconstruct this hidden secret history of the Khazarian Mafia (KM) so please excuse any minor inaccuracies or errors which are unintentional and are due to the difficulty digging out the true history of Khazaria and the Khazarian Mafia (KM). We have done the best we can reconstructing it.

It was Mike Harris that connected the dots and made the actual discovery of the presence of the Khazarian Mafia’s secret history and blood oath to take complete revenge on Russia and the Russians for helping Americans win the Revolutionary War and the Civil War, and their blood oath of revenge against America and Americans for winning these wars.

At the Syrian Conference on Combating Terrorism and Religious Extremism December 1, 2014, in his Keynote address Veterans Today Senior Editor and Director Gordon Duff disclosed publicly for the first time ever that World Terrorism is actually due to a large International Organized Crime Syndicate associated with Israel. This disclosure sent shock-waves at the Conference and almost instantly around the World, as almost every World Leader received reports of Gordon Duff’s historical disclosure that same day, some within minutes. And the shockwaves from his historic speech at Damascus continue to reverberate around the whole World even to this very day.

We now know that the Khazarian Mafia (KM) is waging a secret war against America and Americans by the use of False-Flag Gladio-Style Terrorism, the illegal and Unconstitutional Federal Reserve System, the IRS, the FBI, FEMA, Homeland Security and the TSA. We now know for certain that the Khazarian Mafia(KM) was responsible for deploying an inside-job, Gladio-style False-Flag attack on America on 9-11-01 as well as the Murrah Bombing earlier 0n April 19, 1995.
The Hidden History of the incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia

100-600 AD – an incredibly Evil Society Emerges in Khazaria:

Khazarians develop into a nation ruled by an incredibly Evil King with an ancient Babylonian Black Arts occult Oligarchy serving as his Court. During this time Khazaria become known to surrounding countries as thieves, murderers, road bandits, and for assuming the identities of those travelers they murder as a normal occupational practice and way of life.

600 AD – The Ultimatum is delivered by Russia and other surrounding nations:

The leaders of the surrounding nations, especially Russia have had so many years of Complaints by their citizens that as a group they deliver an ultimatum to the Khazarian King. They send a communique to the Khazarian King that he must choose one of the three Abrahamic religions for his people and make it his official state religion and require all Khazarian Citizens to Practice it and socialize all Khazarian Children to practice that faith.

The Khazarian King was given A choice between Islam, Christianity and Judaism. The Khazarian King chose Judaism and promised to stay within the requirements laid out by the surrounding confederacy of nations led by the Russian Czar. Despite his agreement and promise the Khazarian king and his inner circle of Oligarchs kept practicing ancient Babylonian Black-Magic also known as Secret Satanism. This Secret Satanism involved black-magic occult ceremonies featuring child sacrifice after “bleeding them out”, drinking their blood and eating their hearts.

The deep dark secret of these secret occult ceremonies was that they were all based on ancient Baal Worship, also known as worship of the Owl. In order to fool the confederacy of nations led by Russia which were watching Khazaria, the Khazarian King melded these Luciferian Black-Magick practices with Judaism and created a Satanic hybrid secret religion known as Babylonian Talmudism. This was made the national religion of Khazaria and inculcated the same evil that Khazaria was known for before.

Sadly the Khazarians continued their evil ways robbing, murdering those from other surrounding countries who traveled through Khazaria. Khazarian robbers often and often attempted to assume their identities after they murdered these visitors and became masters of disguises and false identities, a practice they have continued even to this very day along with their secret child-sacrifice occult ceremonies which are actually ancient Baal Worship.

1,000 AD – Russia and the surrounding nations have had enough and take action:

In about 1,000 AD the Russian led a group of nations surrounding Khazaria and invaded it in order to stop the incredibly Khazarian crimes against their people which included kidnapping of their young children and infants for their child sacrifice ceremonies to Baal. Th Khazarian King and his inner court of criminals and murderers came to be known as the Khazarian Mafia (KM) by neighboring countries.

The Khazarian King and his court plotted eternal revenge against Russia and the surrounding countries:
The Khazarian King and his Court (aka the Khazarian Mafia plotted eternal revenge against the Russians and the surrounding nations that invaded Khazaria them and drove them from power.

The Khazarian leaders had a well- developed spy network through which they obtained prior warning and escaped from Khazaria to European nations to the west, taking their vast fortune with them in Gold and silver. They laid low and regrouped while assuming new identities. In secret they continued their Satanic child blood and sacrifice rituals and trusted Baal to give them the whole World and all its riches as they claimed he had promised them as long as they kept bleeding out and sacrificing children and infants for Baal.

The Khazarian Mafia invades England after being expelled for hundreds of years:The curtain is now being pulled back to fully expose the Khazarian Mafia and it’s evil plan to infiltrate, tyrannize the whole World and eradicate all Abrahamic Religions and allow only their Babylonian Talmudism also known as Luciferianism, Satanism or ancient Baal worship.

Linda Goudsmit #fundie conservativenewsandviews.com

Religion and religious freedom gone wild

The First Amendment guarantees Americans the freedom of religion in the “establishment” clause:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Words matter, so the first question that must be answered is a matter of definition.

What is religion?

The dictionary defines religion as:

1. The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
2. A particular system of faith and worship.
3. A pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes superhuman importance.

Dictionaries have been used for centuries to help codify the meaning of words in an attempt to make language useful. Without accepted specific meanings for words it is impossible to communicate through language effectively. Language is the common denominator of speech. Even biblical stories express the importance of the meaning of words as they are understood or misunderstood in any language. The most famous example is the biblical story of The Tower of Babel that begins with everyone on Earth speaking the same language and able to understand each other. Whether the scattering of people around the world was a punishment for hubris or not, the consequence was that people began speaking different languages and could no longer understand each other.

But what happens when people speaking the same language no longer understand each other because they interpret the meaning of the same words differently? That is the situation we are facing in contemporary American society today.

The second question that must be answered is a matter of interpretation.

What does religion mean to you?

Thomas Jefferson wrote eloquently on the subject in an 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists who worried about their minority status in Connecticut. Jefferson was reassuring the Baptists that being a minority religion would not be a problem in a Protestant majority state as far as the federal government was concerned.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”, thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties. (Wikipedia)

Jefferson’s letter clearly indicates that for Jefferson, religion was a matter of Man and God. Jefferson’s interpretation was the widely accepted and understood view of religion in the early 18th century. By the 20th century the U.S. Supreme Court “incorporated” the Establishment Clause and expanded its application from the federal government to the state governments as well.

Practical application

The practical application of the freedom of religion also requires a uniform understanding of the meaning and interpretation of the word religion. The Exercise Clause clarifies the supremacy of Constitutional laws and freedoms over religious laws and freedoms. This is particularly important in contemporary America because we are facing “religious” practices of Islam that threaten our Constitutional freedoms.

The Free Exercise Clause distinguishes between religions beliefs and religious practices. It is the equivalence of distinguishing between thinking and doing. In America an individual is free to think murderous thoughts but he is not free to murder. Islam is a religion governed by religious Sharia Law that endorses honor killings, female genital mutilation, murder of apostates, murder of homosexuals, wife beatings, child marriage and pedophilia. American jurisprudence does not have the will or authority to change people’s beliefs. This applies equally to citizens of the United States, guests in this country, illegal aliens, or citizens of other countries. But we most certainly have the right and legal obligation to disallow any and all practices in conflict with the U.S. Constitution and our cultural norms. Free Exercise Clause (Wikipedia)

“Freedom of religion means freedom to hold an opinion or belief, but not to take action in violation of social duties or subversive to good order.”[28] In Reynolds v. United States (1878), the Supreme Court found that while laws cannot interfere with religious belief and opinions, laws can be made to regulate some religious practices (e.g., human sacrifices, and the Hindu practice of suttee). The Court stated that to rule otherwise, “would be to make the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of the land, and in effect permit every citizen to become a law unto himself. Government would exist only in name under such circumstances.”[29]

Words mean things

In Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940), the Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applied the Free Exercise Clause to the states. While the right to have religious beliefs is absolute, the freedom to act on such beliefs is not absolute. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/310/296/case.html

In Jefferson’s time as in Truman’s time the meaning of the word religion included items 1 and 2:

1. The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
2. A particular system of faith and worship.

Seventy years later in 2017 we must reconsider the meaning of the word religion and ask the question:

What is Islam?

Islam is not a religion like Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, or Judaism. Instead, Islam is a unified supremacist socio-political system with a military wing and a religious wing. Islam features religious sharia law. The goal of Islam since the 7th century is to make the world Islamic and impose sharia law worldwide.

Islam is tyrannical in its demand for conformity to its barbaric sharia laws. It is also intolerant. Islam is a political force seeking world dominion. So we cannot allow it religious protections like the Baptists in Connecticut during Jefferson’s times.

Islam is far more like the Nazis during Hitler’s time. Consider this question. What if Hitler declared Nazism to be a religion. It certainly qualifies as a religion according to Item 3. A pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes superhuman importance.

Suppose Adolph Hitler declared his Nazism a religion. Then would the left-wing liberal apologists for Islam defend Nazism? Would they defend its determination to rule the world and rid the Earth of every Jew? Would the lefty-wing liberals declare murder of Jews protected by religious freedom? How is this different from allowing Muslims to perpetrate honor killings, female genital mutilation, murder of apostates, murder of homosexuals, wife beatings, child marriage, and pedophilia?

There is no difference.

Apologists for Islamic barbarity claim that Islamists have perverted their religion. If so, it is also true that they have perverted our concept of religious freedom. Islam is not a religion like any other. Moreover its savage practices do not deserve protection under our religious freedom laws and the free exercise clause.

Daniel Payne #fundie thefederalist.com

These days it’s no easy life for perpetrators of fake hate crimes and hoaxes generally: every time somebody comes up with a really good fake scandal, the whole thing seems to unravel within a short while. Time was, a man could go through all the trouble to arrange a hoax and could expect to reap the rewards of his hard work. Not anymore.
What’s changed? Part of it is technological: there are more security cameras, more digital paper trails, more text message records. These present opportunities for hoaxes to be exposed: there are simply more chances for people to give something away, either idiosyncratically (by, say, sending an incriminating e-mail or text message) or extraneously (by being caught on a closed-circuit camera, for instance).

Perhaps more importantly, with the multiple sensational hoaxes taking place over the past decade or so (Breitbart has catalogued more than 100 of them), much of the public—at least among those of us who work in media—has become vigilant in spotting such chicanery and exposing it. Just the same, plenty of hoaxes still get widespread attention before they’re exposed; sometimes they cause lots of damage before they’re revealed as fake.
The good news is you can train yourself to be a hoax-spotter as well. You never know: you might be instrumental in exposing the next big fake hate crime or hoax. Here are three things to look for in determining whether an accusation is probably real or possibly fake.
1. The Allegations Are Too Good to Be True
What do I mean by this? Simply that you should be skeptical of claims that overly gratify certain biases or cultural narratives. The more an accusation of wrongdoing or criminal activity sounds like a picture-perfect capitalized example of Hate Crime or Wicked Evil Behavior, the more you should mistrust the claims.
Take, for example, the now-debunked Rolling Stone article “A Rape on Campus,” which detailed an alleged hours-long gang rape of one young woman by a bunch of fraternity boys. The whole story turned out to be a fabrication and a global humiliation for Rolling Stone. But in the beginning, everyone believed it. Why?

As Richard Bradley pointed out (Bradley was one of the first to publicly question the story), the tale gratified many people’s pre-existing biases: biases regarding “rape culture,” fraternities, men (especially Southern men), and feckless, hostile college bureaucracies. You could have hardly asked for a story that played into more prejudices. Coincidentally, the story turned out to be an enormous lie.
Those of us who raised suspicions were lambasted as “truthers” and rebuked as rape apologists and misogynists. Everybody could have saved themselves a lot of humiliation and anger during those crazy weeks if they had simply exercised a bit of healthy skepticism.
More recently, in the aftermath of the Orlando nightclub massacre, a fair number of people claimed to have either had sex with the shooter or else interacted with him on gay hookup apps. There’s that too-good-to-be-true narrative again: an openly anti-gay Islamic man is secretly an active homosexual. It gratifies many peoples’ prejudices: against religion, against anti-gay sentiment, against the way some cultures repress and lambast homosexuality and homosexual desires.
The problem: the allegations are totally unsubstantiated. The FBI has turned up zero evidence. Nobody can find any record of the shooter on any gay dating apps. Somebody produced what appeared to be a profile on one of the apps, but it turned out to be fake. The administrator of one of the apps openly stated he believed it was a hoax. One witness, when pressed to provide more evidence, “became combative,” according to the New York Times: “I don’t need to prove anything to anyone,” he said. “If I said it, it’s true.” Does that sound like a credible witness?

Be skeptical. It doesn’t mean you have to callously or conclusively doubt the people who are making these claims—you should not assume a priori that every victim or witness is a liar. You should, however, be appropriately incredulous when it comes to these things. Fantastical claims should trigger a red flag immediately.
2. The Evidence Doesn’t Add Up
You’re (probably) not a detective or even a journalist, and thus it’s not your job to gather forensic evidence at a crime scene or interview witnesses of murders or assaults. But that doesn’t mean you can’t still make a reasonable judgment regarding available evidence.
Take, for example, the University of Virginia rape hoax mentioned above. The victim claimed to have been raped for three hours on top of broken glass on a fraternity bedroom floor. But she also claimed she refused to go to the hospital for medical treatment. If you’ve been to any frat house across the country, you’ll know they usually aren’t the cleanest or most sanitary places on the planet (I’ve been to several at UVA, and most were uniformly gross). If the rape victim had declined to seek medical treatment after such an episode, the cuts on her back could easily have become infected and she probably would have fallen gravely ill and required hospitalization. That was just one small example of how her story did not add up.
More recently, gay YouTube personality Calum McSwiggan claimed that three homophobic men assaulted him outside of a gay bar in Los Angeles. By his own admission the men punched him hard enough on his mouth to break three of his teeth. The problem? Police later arrested McSwiggan for vandalizing a car, and his mug shot shows absolutely no visible damage to his mouth. Punching someone in the mouth hard enough to snap three teeth in half would leave a lot of bruising and swelling, if not graphically split lips.

More damningly, the Advocate interviewed McSwiggan a few days later, and McSwiggan showed off the bruises, cuts, and other injuries he claims he sustained from the incident—except for his allegedly broken teeth. It’s possible McSwiggan is telling the truth about the assault. But the available evidence strongly implies otherwise. It’s more likely the assault was mostly or entirely fabricated and will be revealed as such in the coming weeks.
So it is with many hoaxes: a quick review of the evidence will often turn up inconsistencies and incoherencies that suggest something isn’t right. Sometimes there are good explanations for these things. Sometimes the explanation is that it’s a hoax.
3. There Is A Big, Public Payoff for the Victim
Our culture has come to prize victimhood: it is often a lucrative trade. Students who claim to feel “unsafe” on college campuses are pampered and feted; liberal college mobs in recent years have even toppled university administrations and forced high-level officials to resign. Being a victim carries a great deal of prestige among large parts of twenty-first-century America.

With this in mind, it is unsurprising many people perpetrate hate hoaxes: they do it for the low kind of fame and fortune that often comes with being a victim. A few years ago a gay waitress fabricated an anti-gay incident for that very reason. A gay pastor in Austin, Texas did the same thing. A black activist at Kean University tweeted fake racist threats at her fellow black students to gin up controversy and build support for her activism.
Sometimes the payoff is less obvious but still very real: earlier this year three black women claimed they were assaulted on a public bus by white men who also hurled racial slurs at them. It turned out to be false: the young women had started a fight on the bus and wanted to deflect attention away from their own bad behavior. In the meantime the women received tons of support and the campus turned into a hotbed of racial activism. Payoff!
Whenever you read of a terrible or sensational claim of violence or bigotry, it is always worthwhile to ask: what is the potential payoff for the people making these claims? This doesn’t mean you should assume every victim of every crime is trying to scam you. But for the kinds of headline-grabbing events that often drive our news cycles, this kind of curious skepticism is always advisable.

If you follow these three rules, there is a better-than-average chance you’ll spot hoaxes instead of being sucked in by them. You may even do better than our credulous media and pundit class, both of which are often very eager to report on these hoaxes without doing even basic investigatory work. You will save yourself a lot of embarrassment on social media if you’re not taken in, and you won’t contribute to any mass hysteria or public pitchfork mobs in the meantime.
There is, of course, a danger in being too skeptical: in doubting 100 percent any kind of wild or fantastical claim a victim or witness makes. You shouldn’t close your mind to the possibility that these claims are true. All of the hoaxes listed here were 100 percent possible. The problem was, they weren’t very plausible—and in the end they ended up being total fakes, promoted and spread by people who were too eager to question much.
Do not be scared to be skeptical. It may make you unpopular with a certain class of people who eagerly want to believe everything that gratifies their biases. You might get yelled at or scolded if you are too prudent or cautious in getting on board with a public outrage. But you’ll be doing the right thing: making an informed judgment based on the facts instead of blind, biased rage. That’s always worthwhile.
Daniel Payne is an assistant editor for The College Fix, the news magazine of the Student Free Press Association. Daniel's work has appeared in outlets such as National Review Online, Reason, Front Porch Republic, and elsewhere. His personal blog can be found at Trial of the Century. He lives in Virginia.

Napoleon de Geso #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Based] Abrahamic religions can just turn things back, when real solution is progress

Those can be usefull in bringing back patriarchy. But under patriarchy femoid is same filthy stupid immoral animal, just forced to act in moral ways. Solution is to go forwards, to progress, and create superior girls, who's morality will come from inside, from their good nature. That requires to take role of gods, and become creators, by improving existing females, or creating new ones, with help of genetical engineering or cybernetics. Abrahamic gods not allow to improve their lame creations, not allow to be creators at all, so for sake of bright future abrahamic religions better to be wiped out , or become just small insignificant sects

image(“Every Dollar Given to the...
Church
…Is A Dollar Not Spent Genetically Engineering Catgirls for Domestic Ownership.”)

But first Islam needs to wipe out rotten degenerate West (for later to be taken out by Orient)

yabruf #fundie disqus.com

yabruf:
Our society is so sad. Go back a few decades and homosexuals were arrested as felons. Go back a few hundred years and the perverts were put to death.
Today we are letting them have children!
What a sick and depraved society that would hand children over to pedophiles in the name of equality.

TheLastHonestLawyer:
It's called progress. Go back a few decades, and Christians in Texas were killing African-Americans for the crime of trying to vote. Go back two centuries and Texas Christians were keeping black people as salves.
And the churches found Biblical support for all of this.

yabruf:
Progress is just the forward or onward movement toward a destination. Hitler made progress in Germany. Stalin made progress in the USSR. The perverts are making progress here in the US.
Your use of the word progress, with regards to the well being of children, is actually a bad thing. Progressing toward a depraved society isn't something that we should strive for....lol
Blacks being persecuted and killed because of the color of their skin has nothing to do with perverts adopting children.
Blacks being brought to the U.S. like animals in chains has nothing to do with pedophiles adopting children.
Christians in Texas helped free the slaves and some gave their lives to do it.
Don't be so naive. I can walk into most churches today that call themselves Christian and claim to teach God's word when they clearly don't.
Two centuries ago popular culture approved of and promoted slavery in Texas and Christian's were opposing it.
Today popular culture has approved of and is promoting perverts adopting children and Christian's are opposing it.

Reb Gutman Locks #fundie mpaths.com

It Almost Always Happens

Yesterday, I was trying to convince a surveyor from England to put on tefillin. He refused. Over and over again... he refused. Not only did he refuse, but he was strong in his refusal.

[...]

"Are you married? Do you have children?" I asked.

"Yes, of course," he answered quickly.

"Is your wife Jewish?" I asked.

"No, she is not."

Instinctively, I took a step back. I just reacted to what he had done by intermarrying and fathering non-Jewish children. "You have pulled yourself away from the Jewish people," I told him.

He quickly took a step forward. He was tough.

"All that matters is that they are good people," he said.

"Why not have them be good people and be Jews, too?" I asked.

"It makes no difference whether they are Jews or not," he said.

"Of course it does. Jews are good for the world. Only one of out 510 people in the world is Jewish, but one out of four Noble Prize winners are Jewish! Jews are a valuable commodity," I explained.

"That doesn't mean anything," he tried to push the statistics away, as if they were meaningless.

I said, "You're an engineer. You're supposed to be logical. But when it comes to seeing the amazing value of Jewish people, you refuse to see it."

I went on, "We see this all the time. When a Jew strongly refuses to put on tefillin, he almost always goes on to think that there is no reason not to intermarry. Now I understand your strong refusal. You don't want to pull away from your non-Jewish family, and you think that if you do anything Jewish you will have to leave them behind."

"As long as the children are good, it doesn't matter if they are Jews or not," he insisted.

"You have done to your family just what all of our enemies for hte past 4,000 years have wanted.... 'No more Jews!'"

He shrugged his shoulders, turned his back to me, and walked away.

Jordan Duchnycz/The Spirit Science #conspiracy thespiritscience.net

(emphasis original)

The biggest secret that absolutely nobody knows about –> And will change EVERYTHING for humankind!!

It’s been a while since I wrote an article… It seems only fitting that I come out of my writing coma in order to divulge in one of the biggest secrets that absolutely nobody knows about… And those who do, are ridiculed for even considering it.

It’s a HUGE secret, i mean, BIG. I mean like, so big that the only thing that would rival it in scope would be Aliens landing and talking to us about our ways.

And this one seems more likely that it will be revealed first.

The Apocalypse… Do you remember from an early Spirit Science cartoon, we discussed that the Apocalypse was the lifting of the veil? A great secret or truth becoming known to mankind?

apocalypse (n.) Look up apocalypse at Dictionary.comlate 14c., “revelation, disclosure,” from Church Latin apocalypsis “revelation,” from Greek apokalyptein “uncover, disclose, reveal,” from apo- “from” (see apo-) + kalyptein “to cover, conceal”

This Apocalypse has yet to reach the masses, it will likely be several years before this truth surfaces as a fact. Nonetheless, it is the truth, and it will destroy all of our religions at once, unless they are able to adapt to the harsh reality that a great civilization existed on earth a long, long time ago.

The secret i’m about to tell you is the last great secret of Spirit Science. Well.. certainly there will be more secrets that will be unveiled in the future… but this is the big one. Everything else is actually really anti-climactic.

Read on fellow learner, and consider the following:

Whatever remnants of the lost civilizations of Atlantis are frozen under approximately 1-2 vertical miles of Ice of Greenland… and the ice is melting.

You see, when Atlantis sunk, it didn’t actually sink. It froze.There was a disaster, a huge one, there was likely a HUGE tidal wave, if not multiple ones. The disruption that occurred caused the entire continent to freeze over, preserved for a time when we would rediscover it again.

It was almost completely encased in ice. And while it is still likely that many of the man-made things were destroyed, however, there is still ample amount of evidence hiding under that ice, waiting to be rediscovered as global warming melts the ice away, revealing our ancient past.

Who knows what ancient technology awaits us under the ice? What I know, without a shadow of a doubt (which truly I can only attribute at this time to deep, spiritual knowing… and a logic that just says “All of the pieces fit”), is that Atlantis existed on a continent of its own, and that continent is what today we know as Greenland.

Are there actual objects and lives frozen in-tact? Or is there just remnants of ancient giant ruins and rubble? That is what we will have to wait and see. However, I wouldn’t be surprised… in fact, I’m expecting it, that when Greenland thaws from Global Warming, the entire world is going to find out that we had a huge, advanced civilization over 13,000 years ago.

And the technology that we find may just be what is needed to save mankind from our global disaster…. Maybe. ;)

I think it will still take collaboration and community to save us, though.

~ ~ ~

So what evidence do I have to support these bold, bold claims you may ask?!

Good question!

No, the ice hasn’t thawed enough to have any physical evidence actually. We have some other items at our disposal. From the word of Thoth on the shape and description of the continent of Atlantis, to the fact that observing the tectonic plates geologists have mapped that the continent of Greenland used to be much farther south than it is today, smack in the middle of the atlantic, most often propertied as to where Atlantis existed before it disappeared.

Do you remember this picture, from Spirit Science 12 – The Atlantis Movie? In this movie we use this diagram of the continent, which was described by Thoth to Drunvalo, and drawn in the Flower of Life books. Other drawings, equally similar, exist in much older texts, spanning back as far as plato.

And then, and only then, mankind will have the evidence it needs once and for all to see that it in fact is far older, and far wiser, and has a far more intricate history than ever imagined before.

It will be undeniable, and the global discussion will take a rapid 90 degree turn into understanding our true origins.

It will not be able to be covered up by any government or corporate conspiracy… And it will be the sign of a new era of mankind to begin.

That’s all I got, enjoy the research, and not to mention talking about this with your friends.

If they call you crazy, don’t worry. You’re not.

— I am authorized by myself to state that despite these bold claims as hard truths, they are still only but theories in my head… but its one of those things that I just have a feeling on that is TOO REAL for me to not make a post about its legitimacy. Sorry, I know thats typically not how science works… THOUGH, that’s also how science progresses. Einstein made a lot of claims before he actually demonstrated anything, and he was right about the things he saw.

Anyways, till next time!

Emily Elizabeth Windsor-Cragg #conspiracy facebook.com

HUMAN & ROYAL TRAFFICKING BY THE UKROYALS

TO: The Privy Council’s 600 Members
FROM: The deposed daughter of King Edward VIII, Duke of Windsor, who fled from his Father George V’s practice of Luciferian Freemasonry and the directive to stage Three World Wars.
MOREOVER--
The Royal Bloodline, being associated with human trafficking, adultery, surrogate breeding, pedophilia networks and drug-running—MUST BE CLEANED OUT and replaced with [psychic] bloodline members who cling to the Covenant of the Kingdom of David under the Church of England—not under Luciferian Freemasonic Rule.
Personally, I feel Monarchy still has unrealized potential to lead, to do good and to prosper Progress for all its subjectsnot merely for Global elites and commercial predators. UK Monarchy can and must abide by "governance by consent of the governed" as good leadership. However, the record shows a different side of the Royal Family than we have ever seen in a newscast.
The present situation is based in privilege alone; and I may sound like a whacked out nutcase indeed for flailing at these silent opponents, but they have not got to their stations honestly, as you will see.
History of Royal Trafficking of Kings, to rid of some and provide others..
1. Prince Albert Vicftor Duke of Clarence. "Eddy," the heir presumptive of King Edward VII, died or something. The Official story says he died of pneumonia or syphillis or after catching a cold. There is a story that Eddy was a homosexual who died of syphillis, or that he married a Catholic girl and they had a child while he was betrothed to May Teck officially; and that the wife was institutionalized and lobotomized by the Royal family headed by George and Edward VIII and the child was adopted out. In this story we get the first glimpse of "dangerous" George who culls family members around him.
There are stories after the ruination of his wife and family that Eddy was sent to Balmoral because he was devastated emotionally and no longer useful as presumed heir. Balmoral is approximately 1000 feet (300 metres) above sea level and as such is partly surrounded by steep cliffs. This was the intended site for the planned murder of Eddy to be undertaken by Randolph Churchill (Winston's old man – Spivey) and John Netley the coachman. The story goes, the prince was pushed from the clifftop but somehow managed to survive his fall and after the passage of two days had endeavoured to crawl all the way back to Balmoral where he was found at the door by his disbelieving hosts.
It is said that a decision was made after this that the best option would be to just incarcerate him at Glamis for the rest of his life and the Earl of Strathmore agreed to undertake this task on behalf of the royals in return for one simple favour. The favour he stipulated was that one of his daughters be allowed to marry a future king of England. Eddy died in 1933, forty one years after his ‘official’ death date and during this time, his mother visited him only once, but took a photograph of him which she apparently sent to her cousin. This photograph is still in existence and shows a much older Eddy thoughtfully painting a picture which would sadly never be seen by anyone outside the walls of Glamis Castle.
The pact between Strathmore and the royal family was eventually fulfilled in 1923 when Lady Elizabeth BowesLyon (his daughter, b. 1900) married the future King George VI of England after originally being betrothed to his brother, the former King Edward VIII. So when Edward REFUSED this "arranged marriage" in 1922 you can imagine the fury of his father King George V and the rage of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon at Edward for the rest of his life, for "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."
CHRONOLOGY. What really appears to have occurred that alters the false history we receive down to our day. Yes, I'm generally talking about what Royal control freaks did during that era, and this theme will percolate through the storyline. I begin this story in the summer of 1888 when Edward 7th Prince of Wales' two sons, Albert Victor “Eddy” and "Georgie" Duke of York (their Christian baptisms presumed) were making their way by train and carriage to Frankfurt Germany for their cousin [Kaiser] Wilhelm's housewarming party at Bath (Bod Homburg), and for Georgie's initiation into the Sacred Order of the Bath.
Why “Georgie” was Victoria's favorite, the Initiate that day and not the Prince of Wales, is of paramount importance to the leadership function. Albert Victor was the heir apparent, but he apparently wasn't interested in this LuciferianOccult affiliation. That decision would be his downfall, for he would lose the support of comembers who expect[ed] any King to follow Luciferianism of Chivalric and Masonis Orders. Do courtiers hold that expectation today, that the Monarch is Luciferian?
King Edward VII had been a frequent guest of Kaiser Wilhelm II at Bath who in 1888 made Bad Homburg his summer residence. On the solstice of that year, a housewarming party was held by the Kaiser, for the Order of the Bath as its location for their annual Initiation rite. As is usual and customary for secret societies based on Luciferian doctrines, the Initiation ceremony that Georgie Duke of York experienced was sexual in nature.
There among the guests of the Kaiser were his nephews, Czar Nicholas of Russia (who was prudish and scandalized by such beha­vior), George Duke of York, Albert Victor Prince of Wales, Alfred de Rothschild (member), and of course the host, Kaiser Wilhelm, as well as a certain maid of the Rothschild estate who became the object of the night's rituals. The lady became pregnant by the Initiate, who left after the ritual for London.
ADOLPH HITLER, his apparent bloodline & story. Subsequently, when the maid contacted the father of her unborn child, he was unwilling to allow her to travel to London. And Jack the Ripper started terrorizing young women of the street in London during that same autumn, so the maid was successfully prevented from seeking out the child's father. (It has been asserted in some quarters that PoW Albert Victor was actually Jack the Ripper, but his personality among his siblings was that of a gentle soul although he had served as a sailor for two years onboard ship. It makes more sense to wonder how it is that the child's father successfully prevented this Rothschild maid from obtaining his aid in her dire need, but nobody noticed the connection between the Ripper and the girl's pregnancy.
(Note, this was the same brother who stood by while brother Albert Victor got into all h is lifetime of trouble, the next year, who was led out into the rain, caught cold and pneumonia [or typhoid] and died (one version), or who lost his wife to insanity, his child to adoption and spent the rest of his life encarcerated (in the other version). Nice brother, eh, standing by?
So the boychild was born near Frankfort and was reared in the household of one Rothschild illegitimate son, Alois Shickelgruber; and he grew to manhood having experienced a very harsh childhood by his stepfather. Because he was very intelligent, he was probably mentored by Kaiser Wilhelm, and by 1912 he was in London staying with his half sisterand brother-in-law until they bought him a ticket back to Germany. He later stood in WWI on the side of Germany as a messenger until his discharge; and by now he was in contact with his father, King George V, through double agent intermediaries in MI5.
Fourteen years after Adolph Schickelgruber's conception at Bath, in 1902 Alfred de Rothschild, who had been present at this Initiation sent George Duke of York a little gift now situated in the Royal Collec­tion., a reminder. The pendant awarded by Alfred de Rothschild to George V, as a reminder of that holiday in Frankfurt and the obligations George had to accept to keep Rothschild quiet says, George was being blackmailed. Now, why would Rothschild do that? Send a reminder of Georgie's Initiation to him now that he was Heir Apparent? Was it a reminder of this event and of the child, now thirteen years old in Frankfurt?
Think about the danger to King George V that Alfred de Roths­child's knowledge of Adolph the illegitimate son presented )as well as his problems with cocaine and opium—we can intuit from photo images from 1900-1910 the King had to become a virtual employee of Rothschild banks. He had to do exactly as he was told, as instructed. Never mind, The Monarchy has a so-so record of holding to the Com­mandments of God, even though they were “God's chosen” to lead humankind. Their history has bespotted our world with blood and sacrifice.
When one looks at the alternate version of Prince Albert Victor's life that he didn't die, but his Catholic wife was lobotimized and insti­tutionalized, their daughter adopted out, and he spent the rest of his natural life in seclusion—and when one considers how Prince John died —one realizes the King has “ways” to control his family so “things work out according to plan.”
The outcomes of this blackmail? 1) the takedown of cousin/Car Nicholas, the Balfour Declaration to give Palestine to Ashkanazi Zionists, in his embrace of general war (and war profits for the banks), in his intolerance and fear of Edward's Christian candor. George the Fifth was a guilty man, busy with repenting before his banking patrons for his former sins.
Edward III, during that time was vested as Prince of Wales and confirmed as Christian Anglican as his Uncle Albert Victor had been; and at this point the father and son began their long ugly standoff,
King versus Heir Apparent. The King wanted a Luciferian son to succeed him, as he had been and done. The King wanted his son to have an arranged marriage, as he had had. The King wanted an Empire, as his “Gangan” Victoria had taught him at her knee. Edward had other ideas. But Adolph the “irregular” son fell right in line with George's objectives.
What is so instructive in my research is what is missing from his biographies : references just as important as what is present. There are no photo images of the Duke of Windsor attending any NWO organizations' events: B'nai B'rith, Bilderberg, Club of Rome, CFR, Int. Institute Strategic Studies, Order of the Garter, of the Bath or Skull & Bones, Poor Knights of the Templar, Rand Research, RIIA, Round Table, Tavistock, Temple Mount Founda­tion, Trilaterial Commission, Universal Freemasonry, Universal Zionism, World Council of Churches. Never. He never attended the Bohemian Grove annual trek. Once exiled, the Duke was focused primarily on military matters and people, as expatriots often are. But the Occult?
1972, at the time of Edward Duke of Windsor’s FUNERAL.
Enough history. Now let’s look at the recent past and history of human trafficking surrounding the Crown of the Windsors.
1. Queen Victoria was a battle-axe.
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-20782442
2. Edward VII was a philanderer, unfaithful husband to Queen Alexandra, who carried on a series of affairs with beautiful English women. What this means is that the maternity of both Albert Victior, PoW, and Georgie Duke of York, is in doubt.
http://www.royalty.nu/Europe/England/EdwardVII.html
3. George V, was reared as a sailor, and he was familiar with Drug-dealing of the East India Company. He arranged for the disappearances of PoW Albert Victor, Prince John, Czar Nicholas and Edward VIII—personally.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1502867672 . . . Saints or Sons of Perdition: George V versus Edward VIII.
Here is what the contemporary Press has to say about these Royals today. ELITE PEDOPHILE RING
4. Lord Mountbatten is accused of pedophilia trafficking.
http://themillenniumreport.com/2016/12/presidents-popes-queen-elite-illuminati-pedophilia-and-child-sacrifice/
http://indymedia.ie/article/20885
http://galacticconnection.com/kincora-paedophile-ring-leads-monarchy-mi5-rothschilds/
5. Elizabeth II not a Royal at all; she’s mercantile.
1926. Bloodline member in doubt. Her mother Eliz Bowes Lyon used a house maid as surrogate.
https://youtu.be/HS2zM7e1PMA
1953. QE2 renounced her Coronation Vows on the day she was crowned in 1953. Elizabeth II signed her Coronation Oath AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE, not at the bottom indicating Acceptance.
2007. Surrogates and doppelgangers adopted as policy to take the place of Royals, anytime they wish.
WHO ARE THESE WOMEN?
2011.
http://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2011/10/mass-genocide-of-mohawk-children-by-uk.html
http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2016/02/queen-elizabeth-found-guilty-in-missing.html
6. Prince Philip is known for drug-running and trafficking
http://itccs.org/tag/prince-philip/
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/20112-the-secret-history-of-the-british-royals/
7. Charles, Prince of Wales, friend of traffickers, especially Jimmy Savile.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biggestsecret/esp_icke108.htm
https://www.activistpost.com/2012/11/the-prince-and-pedophile-charles.html
8. Andrew, Duke of York, patron of Lolita Island and Jeffrey Epstein
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/11337843/Prince-Andrew-I-have-been-foolish-over-friendship-with-Jeffrey-Epstein.html
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/02/prince-andrew-named-us-lawsuit-underage-sex-allegations
OUTCOME:
This branch of the Royal bloodline is no longer to be trusted with Coronation Vows, Dominion nor Leadership of the British Culture, Church or Ethical Practice.

Why Jews Trash Trump #racist realjewnews.com

Reading a few old RJN articles today about Zionist evil, their anti Christ works against white people and Christian culture, made me more aware of this evil and prompted me to post this comment.

The main reason the Jews media praises Obama but reviles Trump is because Obama is black and Trump is white. Satan’s Zionist Jews are trying to replace the traditional old white Christian order of the world with their Jew World Order.

The Jews set up puppets and front men such as Obama and Trump with the intent to portray the Black puppet in the best possible ways and portray the White puppet in the worst possible ways. Jews do this with sports, movies, news stories, and the rest of the media also, not just politics only.

Jews are trying to destroy Christian power, influence, and traditions. Satan and his children, the Zionist Jews, view white Christians as the only substantial obstruction to their Jew World Order. Satan and his children hate white people most because Christian culture spread from Europe to North America, Australia, South America, islands in the oceans, and most of the rest of the world.

From Satan’s viewpoint, it’s the fault of white people that Christianity spread out to the rest of the world. So Satan and his Jews vilify Republicans, white Christian politicians, to weaken and destroy white people along with their Christian religion. Satan and his Jews made lots of progress in destroying Christianity over the last hundred years.

Now Zionists have it so prayer is forbidden in schools, government, and lots of places. Zionists have unleashed the most gross perversion in movies, magazines, and the rest of the Jews media. Zionists promote fags, lesbians, bestiality, and all that is anti Christian.

This destruction of Christianity to come at the time of the end was prophesied over 2500 years ago:

Daniel 12:7 GW - When the power of the holy people has been completely shattered, then all these things will be finished.

The Zionist banksters and media bosses finance the corrupt politicians they want but ruin the best Christian politicians. The Jews pick the worst white “leaders” they can find, ie Bill Clinton, Hillary Rotten, Bubba Bush, Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi, Donald Trump.

The Jews want to portray white leaders in the worst light possible as a way to destroy the influence, power, and leadership of white people and Christian tradition. Putting the worst possible white politicians in office serves the Zionist purpose to portray white leaders in the worst ways. And, such corrupt politicians go along with whatever evils the Zionists want.

Zionists want to replace the old Christian order with a Jew World Order, a world government ruled by Satan’s Jews. Portraying white leaders in the worst ways and making non-white leaders look good is being done to destroy white people and Christian culture.

That is why blacks in sports, politics, the media, are portrayed as great. That is why their crimes, rapes, and murders are downplayed or hidden.

White politicians like Bill Clinton who help cut their own throat and destroy their own people are praised instead of attacked. Destroying white people and their Christian culture is what the Jews are doing. That is why Trump and most white republicans are constantly attacked and ridiculed by the Jews media.

Rabbi Aron Moss #fundie chabad.org

["I recently saw a “Jewish” professor speaking at an anti-Israel rally. When I voiced my disgust to a friend who knew him as a child, I learned that his parents converted to Catholicism back in Europe, he never had a circumcision or a bar mitzvah, and he is married to a non-Jewish woman. He claims in his speeches that he is a Jewish son of a Holocaust survivor. He may be the son of a survivor, but can we say once and for all that he is not Jewish?"]

I share your disgust. But I also have to marvel at such a person. He is a vivid illustration of the indestructibility of the Jewish soul.

Here is a guy who could easily identify as a non-Jew, and has every reason to. His parents converted to another religion, he married out, he reviles everything Jewish, and he sides with the enemy of the Jewish people.

So why doesn’t he just drop the whole Jewish thing altogether?

Because he can’t. Being Jewish can’t be dropped. It is a Jew’s deepest identity. Whether you love it or hate it, it will always be there. No conversion can change that.

And so, in a twisted way, he expresses his Jewishness by being the anti-Jewish Jew.

Yes, he is using his Jewishness as a weapon against Jews.

No, he should not be invited to speak at any Jewish event.

But yes, he is a Jew.

People like that can do a huge amount of damage. But the biggest damage is to themselves. Here is a Jewish soul yearning to connect to Jewishness, who has blocked his own path. Here is someone whose primary preoccupation, whose main claim to fame, is his Jewishness, but a tormented Jewishness. Rather than embrace it, he fights it. He is an accomplice in his own persecution.

We need to counter such attacks on our people from one of our own, but we can’t take away the fact that he is a Jew. Somehow, that Jewish spark is still alive. And any time he wants to embrace it, we will embrace him.

BlkPillPres #fundie incels.co

Christianity Is No Longer A Religion (Its A Virtue Signalling Club)

Seriously think about what a religion is and what its purpose in society, its there to impose order and systems of control, a government is there to impose legal order, religions are there to impose social order

Christianity is no longer a system that imposes control or order, its just a virtue signalling club. During my time in university I met a few Muslim girls, they were from seemingly strict families, the way they spoke of their social lives and parents, they were likely virgins, I never inquired, but they were very reserved and avoided sexual conversations, etc. If I were to try and date one of these girls I'd likely have to speak to their fathers within a week of dating, he'd inquire about me, ask to meet me, and she likely would not refuse, there's a respect for fathers and their authority that I notice when speaking to Muslims, one that you don't see with Christians.

All the girls I met that were "christian" were whores who already had past multiple boyfriends, talked about sex regularly without shame, etc. Yet they'd all talk about how good of a person they were (like all Christians)

Very few Christians today actually follow the doctrine of their book

Take pork for example, Muslims are commanded by their religious doctrine not to eat pork, and pretty much all Muslims adhere to that rule, Christians are commanded to do the same, yet every Christian I know eats pork lol

Most Muslims I've spoken too practice abstinence and advocate for it, most Christians I know are not virgins and treat fornication like its not even a sin.

Lets not even get into the fact that there are gay men who get to openly claim they are Christians, a gay man claiming he's a Muslim would sound and look stupid, and frankly I've never seen one do that

Here's an important aspect of both religions that only one adheres to, in both religions (Christianity & Islam) women are told not to be preachers, to try to be above their men/husbands, etc. Only one religion actually follows that rule

CHRISTIANS TODAY REALLY DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT THEIR DOCTRINE

Its no longer a religion, because nobody cares about the rules anymore, Christianity is just a virtue signalling club, where people gather together and pat eachother on the back for being "nice people", its more about "being liked and accepted" than "serving and obeying your God"

This is why I keep saying, if I was ever going to join a religion it would be islam, I just use Christianity as my goto religion as a formality, its the one I've always signed on forms, etc, and I was born into it, but I see the religion as a joke tbh, you can't look at Christianity and compare it to Islam, and take it seriously as a religion.

When I compare the religions, Christianity today is pretty much just a half assed version of Islam.

Bro. Michael Dimond and Bro. Peter Dimond #fundie mostholyfamilymonastery.com

[From "Dignitatis Humanae – Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious liberty"]

Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious Liberty was without question the most notorious of all the documents of Vatican II. In order to understand why Vatican II’s teaching on religious liberty is heretical one must understand the Catholic Church’s infallible teaching on the issue.

It’s a dogma of the Catholic Church that States have a right, and indeed a duty, to prevent the members of false religions from publicly propagating and practicing their false faiths. States must do this to protect the common good – the good of souls – which is harmed by the public dissemination of evil. This is why the Catholic Church has always taught that Catholicism should be the only religion of the State, and that the State should exclude and forbid the public profession and propagation of any other.

We will now look at three propositions that were condemned by Pope Pius IX in his authoritative Syllabus of Errors.

Pope Pius IX, Syllabus of Errors, Dec. 8, 1864, # 77: “In this age of ours it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be the only religion of the state, to the exclusion of all other cults whatsoever.” – Condemned.[62]

Notice, the idea that the Catholic religion should not be the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of other religions, is condemned. That means that the Catholic religion should be the only religion of the State and that the others should be excluded from public worship, profession, practice and propagation. The Catholic Church doesn’t force nonbelievers to believe in the Catholic Faith, since belief (by definition) is a free act of the will.
[...]
However, it teaches that States should forbid the propagation and public profession of false religions which lead souls to Hell.
[...]
In Quanta Cura, Pope Pius IX also condemned the idea that every man should be granted the civil right to religious liberty.
[...]
Vatican II teaches that religious liberty should be a civil right, which is directly condemned by Pope Pius IX. Vatican II also says that this right to religious liberty applies to public, as well as private, expression; and that no one should be prevented from the public expression or practice of his religion. The teaching of Vatican II is direct heresy against the infallible teaching of Pope Pius IX and a host of other popes. The teaching of Vatican II on religious liberty could literally have been added to the errors of the Syllabus of Errors condemned by Pope Pius IX.

Benedict XVI admits here that Vatican II’s teaching (which he adheres to) is directly contrary to the teaching of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. In other words, he just admitted that Vatican II’s teaching is contrary to the teaching of the Catholic Magisterium. One could hardly ask for more of a confirmation that the teaching of Vatican II is heretical. In his book, Benedict XVI repeats this again and again, calling the teaching of Vatican II “the countersyllabus,” and saying that there can be no return to the Syllabus of Errors!
[...]
Vatican II says that the State exceeds its authority if it dares to prevent religious activity. This is totally heretical.

Here we see Pope Leo XIII (simply reiterating the consistent teaching of pope after pope) teaching that the State not only can, but should curtail and forbid the rights and privileges of other religions to perform religious acts – exactly the opposite of what Vatican II declared. Such public acts, false opinions and false teachings should be repressed by public authority (the State), according to the teaching of the Catholic Church, so that souls are not scandalized or enticed by them.
[...]
To understand this better let’s give an example: If a State were presented, for instance, with Muslims and Jews holding their religious services and celebrations in a public place (even if they were not disturbing the peace or infringing on any private property or upsetting the public order at all), the State could and should (according to Catholic teaching) repress these services and celebrations and send the Jews and Muslims home (or would arrest them, if the law were well established) since they scandalize others and could cause others to join these false religions. The State would tell them their obligation to be Catholic before God and try to convert them by directing them to the Catholic priests, but it wouldn’t force them to do so. This is an example of the clear distinction between 1) forcing one to be Catholic, something the Church condemns, since belief is free and 2) the State’s right to repress false religious activity, something the Church teaches.
[...]
Vatican II’s heretical teaching on religious liberty is precisely the reason why, following Vatican II, a number of Catholic nations changed their Catholic constitutions in favor of secular ones! The Catholic constitutions of Spain and Colombia were actually suppressed at the express direction of the Vatican, and the laws of those countries changed to permit the public practice of non-Catholic religions.
[...]
We can see that the second section of Article 6 of the 1945 Constitution was replaced by that of the 1967 precisely in order to bring the laws of Spain into agreement with the declaration of Vatican II! Perhaps this revision of Catholic laws in a Catholic country, which was made in order to conform to the new religion of Vatican II, illustrates more than anything else the forces at work here. Spain went from a Catholic nation to godless one, which now gives legal protection to divorce, sodomy, pornography and contraception, all thanks to Vatican II.

Darren #racist ldsfreedomforum.com

To be a Jew is to be a child of God. But to be a adherent to the Jewish Religion is to be an adherent to a false religion, a religion of the Apostate.

A majority of the race/culture that calls themselves Jews (80% - 90%), admit by the title they use, that they are not the blood descendents and patriarchal linage of Abraham and his great-...-grandfather Shem. By using that name they admit that they are not born through the linage of the patriarch Abraham. Most of the Jews today are Ashkenazi Jews. Lets look at the linage of an Ashnenazi Jews, that they claim to be a part of.

Genesis 10
1Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth....
2The sons of Japheth; Gomer,....
3And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz....

Ashkenazi Jews are NOT the patriarchal and blood descendents of Shem and Abraham, they are the patriarchal and blood descendents of Japheth and Askenaz.

If you alert Ashkenazi Jews of this fact they call you (you being a person who is a blood descendent of the patriarchal linage of Abraham and Ephraim) an Anti-Semite, which means you are Anti-Shem-ite, or that you have something against the descendents of Shem. :-?

Ashkenazi Jews are living under one of the greatest lies on this planet, that the decedents of Japheth through the Huns, that were made Jews by decree by the Exilarch, are by fiat edict adopted in as the blood and patriarchal descendents of Shem, Abraham and Judah.

Ashkenazi Jews are primarily the patriarchal and blood offspring of the Huns through Japheth, and have been brought in as the adherents of the false Orthodox Jewish Religion headed under the Apostate, the Exilarch, and maintained by the pharisee's Sanhedrin (that is Hebrew for a Greek Synhedrion, a top-down governmental system), as one of the ways to control the world and God's children through false teachings.

When members of the LDS Church do their genealogy they learn that they are the patriarchal and blood descendents of Shem, Abraham and typically Ephraim, (I know because I have my genealogy all the way back to Adam) we learn we are literally true Shemites. When an Ashkenazi Jew derides the true teachings of the gospel story, they are engaged in a behavior of Antisemitism.

Many times in the past large numbers of the Nordic lost tribes of Israel peoples lived in the Holy Land. The Nordic lost tribes of Israel are the bulk of the patriarchal bloodline of Shem and Abraham, and Nordic people are the bulk of the true Shem-ites.

The Huns invaded many of the domains of the lost tribes of Israel and virtually killed off all the Men in those areas they invaded. Then the Huns enslaved and raped the women. The children of the mother Shemites and father Japhethites became a mixed race that has lived predominately in Eastern Europe. The Kahn of the Tatar/Khazars, during the rule by him through the Sanhedrin of the Jews in Constantinople, bestowed upon these patriarchal decedents of Japheth through his grandson Ashkenaz and the Huns, mixed race, matriarchal decedents of Shem through Abraham, the false status of "Jews." This mixed race of Japheth and Shem are called Ashkenazi Jews, and make up more than 90 percent of what today are considered Jews. Compare to the 10 percent of darker skinned Sephardic Jews who are part of the true surviving decedents of the Israelites that did not move to Nordic Europe just before the Romans destroyed Jerusalem, and they intermarried with other local non-Semite decedents.

The Apostate is planning to put a decedent of King David on the World's Throne in Jerusalem, and he is playing off many wannabe Exilarch type world leaders to see which will be most like Attila the Hun (or Alexander the Great "Murderer") in establishing his Exilarchy office among the false Jewish Religion's Sanhedrin management of world finances, a Babylon way to run the world.

Boots, Trewmommy, Aditch,jessileigh180 #fundie whattoexpect.com

@Whatwhatyousatinyouk

What would you do if you found out one of your good friends is a sex offender? I'm talking about doing a serious offense? My husband just found out yesterday that his buddy (they've been friends for a few years now, met through another friend and he's become a good friend over that time) is a registered sex offender. he's one of those guys that you would never have guessed on either. Because we have a baby daughter, I had to ask his wife about it. She played it down as if it was a misunderstanding, but basically he raped a 13 year old girl when he was almost 20. I'm sorry but to me, I do not see any misunderstanding, especially because it wasn't deemed statutory, she did NOT consent. Also, he spent a few years in prison. am very uncomfortable with him now, and will never leave our child with them even though they have 2 daughters. I personally feel like we've been lied to this whole friendship (sex offenders are supposed to tell you they are registered and why) and feel that if we didn't find out from the registry, we would have never found out. They just had their second daughter (his wife's first) so our daughters will be within a few weeks of each other in age, but I do not want to leave her there, EVER, which I won't.

(Trewmommy)
I would say if I was already friends with the person and liked hanging out with them then that would not change,
As far as your friend, It could very well be a misunderstanding of some kind. You never know. He was still rather young and she could have been messing with him and either got mad and told her parents or her parents found out. If she was like 8,9,10 or younger then I would be more worried, but at 13 you just never know, esp these days.


(Boots)
Although you say that he was not charged with statutory rape -- that doesn't mean that the sex wasn't actually consensual. The girl was 13. Her parents could have found out that she had sex with your husbands friend and they may have flipped out. She could have lied to avoid the consequences and said that she had no part in it. I'm not saying that's what happened, but situations like that happen all the time. A guy I graduated high school with is in jail right now because he had consensual sex with a 14 year old. He is 26 years old. She didn't claim he raped her, but he is still serving time in jail. IMO it's still disgusting, but it doesn't mean he's a rapist. Excuse me if I missed something and you are 100% positive that he raped the girl.

(
jessileigh180)


Ages 20 and 13 aren't nearly as far apart as they sound. I would expect a 20 year old man and a 13 year old girl to both be immature at those ages. Either could have lied about their age, I know several girls who look significantly older then they are. I'm also still young enough (22) to remember what I was like at 13.n gereral. If the girl had been younger perhaps 9 or 10 I would agree with your fears for his children but at the age of 13 the girl is really a teenager and her body would reflect that. So even if he did rape a girl who was 13 doesn't have to mean he would attack children.


(Aditch)

I'm not sure I understand your extreme reaction to his presence around your baby. What is the link between him assaulting a teenager to sexually touching your infant? I get that you are unnerved and you want to put up guardrails on the relationship. You may even feel that it is better to cut ties all together. Completely normal reactions. But I think it is important to weigh your response with all the potentials. No, a 13 year old girl can't consent. But unless you know for sure that she didn't play an active role than you can't really deem him a violent sexual predator. My 13 year old has girls in her class who wear more make up than me and wear daisy dukes with heels. My daughter has told me that she knows a girl who is sexually active with her boyfriend. She also has another friend who is 5'8" and weighs 175 pounds. These are not 'children'. They are full on menstruating budding women.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

The Jewish Race
The Jews are characterized and depicted by the Greco-Roman Empire as the “elves” which do Santa Claus’ bidding. Santa lives at the North Pole (i.e., Greenland) where he emails or wires his demands to the Jews in Switzerland who then execute said demands on a global scale. This is why Freyr, the twin brother of the Norse goddess Freyja, is known as the Lord of the elves for the Greco-Roman Empire is lord of the Jews. That is also why the most common greeting in Hebrew is “Shalom” (S+H+L+M), a term which acronymically and/or consonantly equates to “Shill M”. A shill is a fake, a plant or a stooge, while the letter “M” representative of the 13 Bloodlines of the Roman Empire. In other words, the Jews are the unwitting shills of the Greco-Romans in Greenland. In order to ensure that the Jews remain obedient, they have been separated from humanity with their own food (Kosher), history, religion (Judaism), rituals, and identity. The barbaric act of gentile mutilation commonly known as circumcision was originally a Roman act imposed on the Jews to ensure secrecy between them. Therefore, it was customary for Jewish men to show their circumcised penis’ to each other in order to prove that they were in fact Jews and trustworthy of giving or receiving information, intelligence or payment. Although the Jews have victimized countless people over the centuries, they too are victims of the Greco-Roman Empire.

Isle of Ewe (Jew)
Aristotle believed that the Jews originally came from India where they were known as the “Kalan” (C/K+L+N), a term which acronymically speaking is the same as “clan” (C/K+L+N). While Aristotle may in fact be correct, the Jews were evidently named after the Isle of Ewe, a small island on the west coast of Ross and Cromarty in Scotland which is exactly 90 miles away from where the Loch Ness Monster was seen. The term “Jew” and the race of the Jewish people may have been derived from this island as the pronunciation of “Ewe” equates to “Yu” or “Jew”. Coincidentally, there are two competing theories about the meaning of island’s name. Either it was derived from the Old Irish “eo” meaning "yew tree", a possible reference to the linage of the Jewish race which was spawned from the island, and/or it was derived from the Gaelic “eubh” meaning "echo" for the island was responsible for echoing Greco-Roman policy in the underworld. In all likelihood, the Isle of Ewe was responsible for receiving intelligence, money and orders from Greenland via submarines at Loch Ness. The notion that the island was a key port in the underworld is evidenced by the coat of arms of the Isle of Ewe which depicts a U-shaped Greco-Roman Clipper ship. Evidently, prior to the invention of submarines, ships from Greenland would dock at the island. According to Donald Monro’s book “Description of the Western Isles of Scotland” (1549), the "Ellan Ew, haffe myle in length, full of woods, guid for thieves to wait upon uther mens gaire. It perteins to M’Enzie”. Similarly, George Buchanan wrote in his “Rerum Scoticarum Historia” (1579) that the island was "almost all covered with woods, and good for nothing but to harbor thieves, who rob passengers". The references to thieves appear to be a veiled tribute to the Jewish families which previously lived on the island until the Second World War. Due to the usury and fiscal policies implemented in the underworld by the Jews, they became known as notorious thieves. As evidenced by the boot shape of the Isle of Ewe, the island mimics the boot of Italy, the boot of Bern in Switzerland, and the boot of Louisiana, all of which both of which are symbolic of the boot or foot of the Greco-Roman Empire which has been placed on the collective throat of the underworld. In what appear to be tributes to the Isle of Ewe in popular culture, the island was featured in "Lurgi Strikes Britain” (1954), an episode of the television show “The Goon Show”, as well as in the second chapter of Telltale Games' adventure game “Tales of Monkey Island: The Siege of Spinner Cay” (2009). Lastly, the term “I love you”, possibly the most famous three words ever spoken, were evidently derived from the Isle of Ewe. Because the name of the island sounds like "I love you" when spoken, whenever it is used it is a tribute to the Isle of Ewe in Scotland.

Jewish Terrorists
Sicarii comes from the Latin word Sica”, meaning “dagger”. Consequently, the Sicarii, or the "dagger men", were Jewish terrorists who carried out assassinations and murders with short daggers in crowded places before slipping away. They also committed attacks in villages which they raided, plundered and set on fire in order to create fear among those who acquiesced or collaborated with Roman rule. They also kidnapped notables as leverage for the release of their own members which were being held prisoner. In short, the Sicarii Jews were used to commit terror attacks in the Roman Empire in order to destabilize the empire after the 13 Bloodlines of the Roman Empire vacated to Greenland. Titus Flavius Josephus wrote the only account of the activities of the Sicarii, stating: “…a different type of bandits sprang up in Jerusalem, the so-called Sicarii, who murdered men in broad daylight in the heart of the city. Especially during the festivals they would mingle with the crowd, carrying short daggers concealed under their clothing, with which they stabbed their enemies. Then when they fell, the murderers would join in the cries of indignation and, through this plausible behavior, avoided discovery.” This is why the country of Israel is shaped in the form of a dagger, a modern tribute to the Sicarii and the terrorism committed by Jewish people on behalf of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland. Coincidentally, the name “Israel” was created by the combination of the Greco-Roman gods of Isis, Ra and El.
The Jewish Scapegoat
Protocols of Zion, the Jewish playbook on how to divide and terrorize the masses of the world into submission, was conveniently “discovered” in Russia in 1903. This document was most likely leaked on purpose by the Greco-Roman Empire to ensure that those looking for the true source of power in the world would ultimately stumble upon the Jews, never considering that the power structure goes one step higher to Greenland. That is why Zionist Jews and the State of Israel have been implicated in countless terror attacks against their fellow Jews and Goyim alike. The actual word “scapegoat” is defined as an individual, group (Jews), or country (Israel) that is singled out to bear the blame for others. The concept of the Jewish scapegoat is coincidentally the central theme of Yom Kippur, also known as the Day of Atonement, the holiest day of the year for the Jewish people.

Star of David
The Star of David, known in Hebrew as the Shield of David or Magen David, is widely recognized as the symbol of Jewish identity and Judaism. It is shaped in the form of a hexagon, a 6-pointed star that is formed by the compound of two equilateral triangles. The number 6 is a favorite esoteric number of Rome which is most commonly associated with death and destruction. The name “David” (D+V+D) means "Divide" and the therefore the "Star of David" means the "Star of Steer of the Divide". In other words, the Jewish people are steered by Rome to keep the people divided amongst themselves, but more importantly, to keep the divide between upper Earth (Greenland) and the underworld (hell). The hexagon is significant because through the use and abuse of the Jewish people, Rome has effectively put a hex (curse) or a hoax on all of mankind. The two opposing triangles depicted in the Star of David (see below) can be taken quite literally as what is ordered by Rome in Greenland is reflected and executed in the underworld by the Jewish people through the main Roman proxy state of Switzerland.

Sanhedrin (World Jewish Congress)
The Sanhedrin, meaning "sitting together", was an assembly of 20-23 Jewish men appointed in every city in the Land of Israel. The Great Sanhedrin was made up of a “Nasi” who functioned as head or representing president, but was not a member of the court. Although only conjecture, it’s highly likely that the Ashkenazi Jews were descendants of the Nasis or Nazis. Ashkenazi Jews represent the bulk of modern Jewry, with at least 70% of Jews worldwide. The last session of the Great Sanhedrin reportedly occurred in 358 AD when the Hebrew Calendar was adopted. The Sanhedrin was allegedly dissolved after continued persecution by the Roman Empire. The Sanhedrin is traditionally viewed as the last institution that commanded universal Jewish authority among the Jewish people in the long chain of tradition from Moses until the present day. While the Sanhedrin no longer exists in name, the World Jewish Congress (WJC) was founded in Geneva, Switzerland, in August 1936 as an international federation of Jewish communities and organizations. According to its mission statement, the World Jewish Congress' main purpose is to act as "the diplomatic arm of the Jewish people." The WJC has special consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council. The main aims of the organization were to create “a worldwide Jewish representative body based on the concept of the unity of the Jewish people, democratically organized and able to act on matters of common concern”. Although only conjecture, the World Jewish Congress likely meets in Basel, Switzerland which coincidentally has a Congress Center. Since Switzerland is the first Jewish state and there is no official congress within the Swiss government, the Congress Center may be the underground location where the Jewish Congress meets on a regular basis.

Racist Ideology
Just as the Romans are racist to anyone without pure white skin, red hair and blue eyes, most Jews are racist against anyone not of their ethnic origin. The term goy or goyim which is found in the Talmud, the Jewish Bible, refers to all those who are not Jews as “animals” and a number of other derogatory and racist terms. The irony is that the terminology used by the Jews against the peoples of the world is the same terminology used by the Romans against the Jews and the people of the world. In essence, the Jewish race and religion was created as a cover so that the Romans could carry out their evil in the world while scapegoating the Jews in the process. The only way to keep the Jews form assimilating with and feeling sympathetic to the other peoples of the world which would obviously disrupt Rome’s evil plan for the world is to keep the Jews separate. This is done by giving the Jews their own religion (Judaism), their own Bible (Talmud) their own place of worship (synagogue), their own type of diet (kosher food), their own type of penis (due to circumcision), their own Jewish holidays most of which coincide with Roman holidays, and of course their own country of Israel which is used to justify their evil deeds against the goyim. An example of a Roman holiday doubling as a Jewish holiday is the Purim. Although Jews have been indoctrinated to believe Purim is a celebrating victory of the Jews over their enemies, it was actually the Roman Empire which defeated Persia by trickery. Purim is celebrated annually on the 14th day of the Hebrew month of Adar. The 14th letter in the Roman Score (alphabet) is the letter “X” meaning “kill”, hence the name Xerxes I of Persia which was posthumously given to the defeated king.

Fake History of the Jews
According to modern historical accounts, the Kingdom of Judah in Israel was conquered by the Babylonian army in the early 6th century BC, destroying the First Temple which was the center of ancient Jewish worship. The Jewish elite of Judah were then exiled to Babylonia (i.e., Babylon, Rome) which is historically regarded as the first Jewish Diaspora. The Jews later returned to Judah after the subsequent conquest of Babylonia by the Persians some 70 years later, a period known as the Babylonian Captivity. A new Second Temple was then constructed and old Jewish religious practices were resumed. During the early years of the Second Temple, the highest religious authority was a council known as the Great Assembly, led by Ezra of the Book of Ezra. The Great Assembly was allegedly responsible for writing the last books of the Bible and sealing the canon. However, after the alleged First Jewish-Roman War (66–73 AD), the Romans allegedly destroyed the Second Temple. In all likelihood, the purported Jewish–Roman Wars as well as the Bar Kokhba Jewish Revolt (132-136 AD) never transpired in reality. They were only created in order to give the Jewish people a sense of history as well as the idea that they once fought valiantly against the Roman Empire for whom they now unwittingly serve. The very notion that the Roman Empire would allow the Jews to build Solomon's Temple (i.e., The First Temple) and The Second Temple which are almost identical to Greco-Roman temples with their famous arches and columns, is preposterous to say the least. In order for the Jews to fulfill their role as “God’s chosen people” and enforce Roman policy in the underworld, they truly have to believe in their hearts that they are in charge, hence the creation of their fraudulent history.

Aelie Capitolina
The city of Aelie Capitolina was allegedly built in Israel by the Roman Emperor Hadrian on the current site of Jerusalem. It was allegedly destroyed in 70 AD in the wake of the Jewish Bar Kokhba revolt of 132–136. Aside from the fact that "Aelie" in acronymically translates to "lie", the city of Jerusalem is not adjacent to any river, sea or ocean, an unlikely candidate for a major metropolitan Roman city. According to a February 21, 2012 report by Haaretz, in a few more years, Aelia Capitolina could again be covered over by new buildings, a clear sign that there is absolutely no interest in excavating and finding the hypothetical former city. After all, if Jerusalem was completely excavated, the myth behind Aelie Capitolina and its fraudulent history would ultimately disappear, something the Greco-Roman Empire cannot afford to let happen. If there was in fact a Jewish capitol underneath the city of Jerusalem, excavators would surely find far more than just a large pottery-workers village that allegedly served as the city’s central clayware manufacturing plant.

Fake Persecution of the Jews
In “Embassy to Gaius”, Philo of Alexandria (i.e., Philo Judaeus), the man after which Judaism was named, claims to have been part of an embassy sent by the Jews to the Roman Emperor Caligula to ask that the rights of the Jews be secure. Philo asked Caligula, "Are you making war upon us, because you anticipate that we will not endure such indignity, but that we will fight on behalf of our laws, and die in defense of our national customs? For you cannot possibly have been ignorant of what was likely to result from your attempt to introduce these innovations respecting our temple." Since Jewish customs, laws and temples did exist at that time, these historical references were evidently created by Philo in order to give the Jews the desired identify they would need in order to effectively fulfill their role as the henchmen of the underworld. Philo goes into detail about the horrific plight of the Jews when he states that Flaccus "was destroying the synagogues” and that he "issued a notice in which he called us all foreigners and aliens... allowing any one who was inclined to proceed to exterminate the Jews as prisoners of war." Philo also states that the Roman mobs "drove the Jews entirely out of four quarters, and crammed them all into a very small portion of one ... while the populace, overrunning their desolate houses, turned to plunder, and divided the booty among themselves as if they had obtained it in war." In addition, Philo states that the enemies of the Jews "slew them and thousands of others with all kinds of agony and tortures, and newly invented cruelties, for wherever they met with or caught sight of a Jew, they stoned him, or beat him with sticks". Philo even states that, "the most merciless of all their persecutors in some instances burnt whole families, husbands with their wives, and infant children with their parents, in the middle of the city, sparing neither age nor youth, nor the innocent helplessness of infants." Some men, he says, were dragged to death, while "those who did these things, mimicked the sufferers, like people employed in the representation of theatrical farces". It appears that Philo’s accounts of the Jews in Alexandria was fabricated in order to give the Jews a fake history of persecution so that the Jewish race as a whole would always be paranoid and stick together, a genius strategy which has worked even until this very day.

Glenn Okafor #racist antisemitism.uk

Glenn Okafor, aged 32, has been convicted of shouting “we will wipe you out” and other antisemitic abuse, including death threats, at Jewish people in Stamford Hill in London on 4th March this year. The incident occurred at 9:00 on a Saturday morning as Jewish families made their way to synagogue, at one point even entering the front garden of a synagogue. Mr Okafor exclaimed at Jewish passersby: “F*** you Jewish people…you lot should go back to your own country”.

He also added: “We will sort you out. I have friends. I’ll be back tomorrow. We will wipe you out.” In an apparent reference to a conspiracy theory that white Jews are in fact imposters and that the supposed real Jews are black, Mr Okafor shouted: “We are the real Jews”. Stamford Hill Shomrim, a Jewish volunteer neighbourhood watch patrol, assisted officers from the Metropolitan Police Service in arresting Mr Okafor and a man who was walking with him.

Mr Okafor, of West Norwood, was found guilty at Stratford Magistrates’ Court of two counts of religiously-aggravated intentional harassment, alarm or distress contrary to section 4A of the Public Order Act 1986, as amended. He was sentenced at Thames Magistrates’ Court to a 12-month community order with 200 unpaid hours of work. His sentence would have been 150 hours of unpaid work, but 50 hours were added following an application by the Crown Prosecution Service. He was also ordered to pay £150 to his victims and costs of £620.00 to the Crown Prosecution Service.

Chair of the bench, Danni Tate, was not persuaded by Mr Okafor’s claims that he was merely seeking to engage in “theological debate” and wanted to ask his victims “a few questions about the origin of Judaism”.

The victims had to attend court four times during the trial, and each time they were accompanied and supported by volunteers from Stamford Hill Shomrim.

Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for North London, Jan Lamping, said: “Stiffer sentences are a powerful way of sending the message that hate crime is viewed very seriously in the eyes of the law. These were unacceptable, hostile words and threats directed at worshippers intended to make them fearful of their safety. I would encourage all victims to report hate crimes so that others do not become the target of hateful abuse.”

We commend Stamford Hill Shomrim, the Metropolitan Police Service and the Crown Prosecution Service for ensuring that Mr Okafor was brought to justice, however we regret that this sentence is merely the latest in a chain of lenient punishments that will not deter antisemites.

Kevin Dunn #fundie kingmannafta.com

Ladies and gentlemen, here is why Pope John Paul II is the antichrist.

Revelation
Rev 17:7 And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
Rev 17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
Rev 17:9 And here [is] the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
Rev 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, [and] the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
Rev 17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

Please watch this video http://www.john1429.org/video/antichrist/Antichrist-128.html

That video explains almost everything that I would explain, but it does not go so far as to identify the antichrist, it only identifies the 1st beast of Revelation 13.

To help reduce confusion, it will help to keep this in mind:

God The Father, Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit

Satan, antichrist, False Prophet

Satan tries to mimic God in every possible way in order to deceive people. God exists as 3 separate beings and Satan tries to duplicate that.

So here are the key verses that identify Pope John Paul II as the antichrist:
Rev 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, [and] the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
Rev 17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

A person needs to know a little history to understand this, but in 1929, the Vatican and Italy signed the Lateran Treaty which made Vatican City a separate nation. Nations are ruled by kings, presidents, etc. The Pope is the head of the Catholic church and thus became the king of Vatican City.

If you go here: http://www.wordiq.com/definition/List_of_popes
you will find an outdated list of all of the Popes, but you will see that Pope Pius XI was the Pope at the time that the Lateran Treaty was signed, which made him the 1st king.

OK, look at Rev 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is,

Start counting Popes and you will see that Pope John Paul II is the 6th Pope and notice the verse "AND ONE IS". God made certain that there was a distinction given in Scripture. God could have said "4 have fallen........", but He made the 6th king distinctive from the rest.

Then Rev 17:10 says: [and] the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.

Pope Ratzinger is "the other" Pope, and God says he will continue for a short time. I don't know exactly how short a time, but Pope John Paul II reigned for about 27 years, so I suspect that Pope Ratzinger will reign for 13 years or less.

Now this is where the antichrist appears in this verse:
Rev 17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

The beast that was: John Paul II

and is not: John Paul II died in 2005

even he is the eighth, and is of the seven: this means that one of the Popes is coming back. (for people who are still confused, think of a 7 person softball team and the batting rotation. After everyone has batted once, the first batter comes to bat again, although in this case, the rotation goes to John Paul II)

Does anyone even remember who was Pope before John Paul II? I learned from "momof4survivor" that John Paul II's picture is in a new Bible that she bought, which means that he is still being promoted to the public. He was the most travelled Pope, the most well known, and the most liked Pope in recent memory. Furthermore, the Bible clearly singles him out "AND ONE IS".

Now I have said to you that Satan tries to duplicate everything that God does in order to deceive as many people as possible. When John Paul II appears to come back, it will be Satan trying to duplicate the resurrection of Jesus Christ. John Paul II will NOT be coming back because the Bible says in this verse:

Hebrews 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment

This can mean only one thing.... a fallen angel will be impersonating Pope John Paul II.

David Benkof #fundie blogs.timesofisrael.com

[This is part of a response to Rabbi Gil Steinlauf, senior rabbi of the largest Conservative synagogue in DC, who came out as gay and divorced his wife.]

Steps like yours no doubt feel like the right thing to do for gay men in loveless marriages. But you’re not just any gay man. You’re one of the most important Jewish leaders in your city. Part of your job is to help model a loving Jewish family.

Leave aside homosexuality. What does your announcement say to the many men in your synagogue who are more sexually attracted to younger women than to their wives? I doubt you’d approve of a congregant breaking up his family to chase after his 28-year-old secretary.

Oh, but you say being attracted to men is “who you are.” Well, for a lot of heterosexual males, being attracted to younger women is “who they are” too, but we don’t give them dispensation to seek – casualties be damned – self-actualization.

I’m not telling you this as an Orthodox Jew to a Conservative one – or as a celibate gay man to one who wants to explore same-sex relationships. I speak as a coreligionist who is concerned about the impact your decision will inevitably have on the people around you.

Yes, you came out yesterday. That doesn’t mean you can’t “go back in” today. If you don’t, I recommend that Adas Israel start looking for a new senior rabbi.

rueangel #fundie disqus.com

rueangel:
Well, certainly, any right thinking person must agree, that, any ,..well rounded,..5 year old should have a working knowledge of ,..male on male anal sex,..but perhaps, the subjects of the use of ,..whips, or fisting,.. should be not be introduced until the child is, at least, 6,..
Ya think,.?

Sally Edwards:
I'm not surprised this story outrages you if that's the first thing that comes to your mind when you think of homosexuality. Let's just take the most extreme sexual practices and define them all by that. By the way, where did you ever get the idea that straight people WEREN'T into all the things you listed?

rueangel:
So,.. where id you ever get the idea that I thought that these practices were limited to gay males,.?
But, anyway, while the perversions listed above are ,..occasionally, practiced by,..some,.. herteros, they are key component among gay males, & I believe that fisting is, pretty much, a gay male practice

Sally Edwards:
Practiced by what, a fraction of a percentage of them? You can't single out an entire group for any specific sexual practice. And no, I Googled "fisting" and there are entire books written about it.

rueangel:
The fact of the matter is, that, male on male anal penetration of the anus , by the penis, is the most common male homosexual activity. And,..
Such male on male anal penetration of the anus , will, in time, cause damage to the anus, & leave a percentage of those who engage in that practice to be left,..' pooing,.. in a bag that is strapped to their leg
And, not to mention the negative health affects of poking a penis around into all of that ,..poo.
But, anyway, I fail to understand why grade schoolers need o be subjected to any description of any homosexual act, whether,..'extreme',.. or not. I mean..what's the point?
But anyway, lets get real here,..In that the ,.'REAL",.. purpose of introducing the subject of homosexuality, into grade schools. & depicting it in such a ,.'positive',.. light, is to,.'brainwash',... a portion of those grade schoolers into,..'becoming',.. homosexual themselves,..which is a part of the ,.'NEW WORLD ORDER',.. agenda which includes the destruction of the family, & population control,..
And,..
I will add to that, the fact that the Zionist owned, media, is pushing this homosexual agenda, to the limit, as a means of destroying the moral fiber of the Goyim, in order to destroy western civilization, & to, thereby, genocide the White race, & thereby leave ,..'World, Zionist Jewry',.. ruling over a world of ,..'brown,.. people, with average IQs of about 70.
I refer you to the,..'KALERGI PLAN',.. which lays out this demonic, Zionist, Rothschild, conspiracy, in detail.
I note, that, while, on one hand, the Zio media, & Zio controlled educational system is pushing this homosexual agenda, in the public schools, I doubt that it is being pushed in ,..'JEWISH',.. schools, & while it is also being pushed by Zionist interests in Europe & Canada, & Australia,. as far as I know, I don't think that it is being pushed on Jewish children in Israel,..
Just turnover any rock, & underneath,it, you will find there lurking a Zionist Jew,..
Google,..'KALERGY PLAN',..

Sally Edwards:
Here’s how we know your information is a crock.
Anal sex is very common between straight couples too. How many women do I see with a bag to crap in? Come to think of it, how many gay men do I ever see who have to “go” in a bag? Zero.

rueangel:
The fact of the matter is, that, the anus is designed for,..one way,..traffic & anal sex can lead to damage that can lead to the necessity of using a ,..bag, that is strapped to the leg, & also it can spread diseas,..Did you ever head of AIDS,.? & just because you never saw such a bag, doesn't mean that it doesn't happen.
But anyway, back to the issue at hand, which is, whether, of not homosexuality should be pushed onto grade schoolers, in such a way as to encourage it practice, by children that have not yet developed their own ,..'natural, inherent, hertero sexual nature,..
As in my comment above, I point out that there is an agenda afoot, to increase the incidence of homosexuality, as a means of cutting down the birthrates, this agenda, being pushed, largely by Zionist/Rothschild/Soros NWO type entities.

Sally Edwards:
Of course 6 year olds don't need to know the particulars of anal sex, but who's talking about teaching them that in the first place? Especially when you don't teach straight intercourse to 6 year olds, either.
It's like I said to Amos earlier, you teach children about homosexuals by simply saying sometimes a boy will fall in love with another boy or a girl will fall in love with another girl. That's all you need to say.
What you've been taught about people with damaged anuses is a lie. That doesn't happen. Or if it does, it's rare and would not be specific to homosexuals. Many homosexual men don't even engage in anal sex.

rueangel:
Back in the,..'olden days',.. when I wen to grade school,, back in the first half of the last century, we somehow managed to get through K to 12 without the subject of homosexuality ever being brought up in a classroom, but somehow we managed to grow up & get through life, without, such indoctrination,..having learned through the grapevine at about age 10, or so, that there were some guys, that liked to suck on each other's peepee weenies, & we learned that these guys were called queers,..& that was about all we needed to know. It was only , somewhat later that we heard bout anal sex, which we considered to be really,..real;y disgusting.
And, as to the idea that male on male sexual attraction has something to do with ,..'love',.. The fact of the matter is that gay males are notoriously promiscuous, often having hundreds, or even thousands of ,..'partners',.. in their lifetimes.
And male on male anal sex, often has an element of ,..'domination, and/or Sado -masochism involved, especially in rape situations, whether it is male on male, or male on female,..
And
Black males,, especially, , seem to enjoy inflicting pain, and or injury on their victims with their,.. tools.,..which they use as weapons/, of attacks on the anus of their victims..
So sure, I know that herteros also, indulge in anal sex, but that is largely because anal sex is being pushed by the Zio-Media as being, particularly, exciting & ,..'trendy'.
So, I still maintain that there is nothing healthy about anal sex, from either a physical,or a mental point of view,..
And,..
If it is going to be discussed in school, the discussion should consist of warnings against it,..For all of the reasons, mention above & previously,..

DiggerForTruth #conspiracy #racist #dunning-kruger diggerfortruth.wordpress.com

Digger’s response in bold capitals. Here is a classic example of someone who has been poisoned by the onslaught of jewish mind control. Understandable, but sad ………………

I can’t believe you people are actually buying this crap..
NO YOU HAVE BOUGHT THE JEWISH CRAP, WE ARE THE ONES WILLING TO BE OPEN MINDED AND INDEPENDENT THINKING ENOUGH TO LOOK AT AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE JEWISH BRAINWASHING.
6 million people were killed, A KOSHER LIE/NARRATIVE (FAIRYTALE)

multiple families that were affected by this tragedy can verify this. YOU CAN SPEAK TO HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS,
HA – WOT THE JEWISH LIARS WHO SPEW OUT THIS FABLE(?)

how the fuck can you deny a living testimony? I’m an open minded person who hears everyone one out, but this is fucking backwards and pathetic on your parts for allowing your minds to rot with these rotten ideas of a man who was a coward THAT IS ONE THING HITLER WAS NOT – A COWARD.

He drove the world to misery from behind a desk WRONG! THIS IS YOUR BRAINWASHING FILTERING THROUGH. YOU ARE A REPEATER, SUFFERING FROM THE DISEASE OF REPEATITIS. THIS HERO ACTUALLY FAUGHT IN THE WAR AND WAS INJURED FOR IT. HE CARED PASSIONATE ABOUT HIS PEOPLE, HIS COUNTRY AND ETHICAL VALUES BEING DESTROYED.

and watched others die for his insanity and agenda. You people have no idea about the horrors of the fascist goverment that monster established, LOL you wouldn’t be allowed to even be out here on the web stating your opinions! NONSENSE, IT IS PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO ARE CURBING OUR THOUGHTS. WHY THEN ARE PEOPLE IN JAIL FOR SPEAKING THIS TRUTH. OHH, COME ON ….IT’S SO OBVIOUS. THAT FACT ALONE SHOULD RING ALARM BELLS. IT’S OBVIOUS. THE(YOU) JEWS JUST DON’T WANT THEIR BIG FAT LIE OUT IN THE OPEN. BECAUSE THEN THEIR WHOLE CHARADE AND UBIQUITOUS DECEIT AND EVIL WILL COME CRUMBLING DOWN. THIS NARRATIVE HAS TO BE KEPT ALIVE AS A MIND CONTROL TECHNIQUE, A BUFFER TO CURB PEOPLE’S CRITICISM OF INTERNATIONAL JEWISH CRIMINALITY.

So wake up HA – THAT’S THE KETTLE CALLING THE POT BLACK and realize that you’re in denial and will never in your lives see a time where the world will believe the ridiculous notion that Hitler was a good man, so just drop this crap and start living normally NORMALLY, NORMALLY – OHH DEARRRR ME. LIVE NORMALLY. WELL THAT SAYS IT ALL DOESN’T IT. DO YOU MEAN ‘NORMALLY’ WATCH TV AND BELIVE THE JEWISH MIND CONTROL (AS YOU HAVE), DO YOU MEAN ‘NORMALLY’ WATCH THE HITLER CHANNEL AND BELIEVE THE BS? DO YOU MEAN ‘NORMALLY’ SUPPORT OUR TROOPS TO FIGHT ANOTHER JEWISH WAR? WHAT EXACTLY DO YOU MEAN LIVE NORMALLY???

and accept others. WE CERTAINLY ACCEPT OTHERS, BUT ARE YOU EXPECTING US TO STAND BACK PASSIVELY AND ‘ACCEPT’ THIS 360 DEGREES JEWISH PERFIDY??

Though racism is not fully eradicated we have come a long way, the world has evolved and left you behind. WRONG AGAIN! AND EQUALLY INVERTED THINKING. IT IS YOU WHO IS REGRESSIVE IN YOUR THINKING. IT IS TIME TO GROW UP, BE BRAVE, TAKE A DEEP BREATH AND FACE REALITY. WHY ARE YOU SO SCARED OF THE TRUTH??

I’m hispanic and I have very good friends who are white, black, asian, european, indian, JEWISH, and from many other places and I judge them all off their character not ethnicity or race. OHHH P-L-E-A-S-E; THIS IS PAINFUL AND ALMOST LAUGHABLE. CHARACTER YOU SAY……WELL, FINALLY WE ARE KINDA IN AGREEMENT. YES, YES, YES – THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE DOING. WE ARE HIGHLIGHTING THE JEWISH ELITE CHARACTER. JUST LOOK AT THE JEWISH COLLECTIVE CHARACTER. START TO DO SOME ‘INDEPENDENT’ READING. HAVE A LOOK AT THE SIDE BAR AND YOU MAY JUST WAKE UP TO THE REALITY.

Hitler and you zealots can spew all his bullshit about evolving this and the aryan race that, but a racist mind is an inferior mind. If not for anyone, do yourselves a favor and cleanse your mind of this bullshit because it will get you nowhere in life. NOW I’M ACTUALLY CHUCKLING AWAY AT YOU. GOD BLESS YOU. I DON’T KNOW IF THERE IS ANY HOPE FOR YOU. YOU SOUND TOO FAR GONE. TOO BRAINWASHED BY THE JEWISH MIND CONTROL.
PS: Digger I pity you the most, man. ARRHHH – BLESS YOU.

DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING

ToumaYukiri #psycho removeddit.com

[ in response a person breaking up.with someone for constantly accusing them of cheating, sending death threats to all their friends and demanding them to cut ties with their friends ]

It sounds you don't know to deal with her. Example: Instead of spending your time with your friends, spend the time with her, let her enjoy being with you no matter what the consequences are. Soon after, invite her with you and other friends and have fun, there is a chance of creating a trust with your friends and therefore she would trust you being with them, but that doesn't mean you have to stop. An honestly, it's kinda your fault. You know she isn't normal, that's why you should've given more effort with being with her. Take me for example, I have a shy obsessed girl (kinda yandere) who didn't talk to anyone expect me. Soon after I helped her being normal, invited some friends and soon after, she had friends. With a Yandere, you main goal is to end up in a relationship, but not a normal one, with much more efforts than normal.

Yeah, I did. I blew off my friends when they wanted to hang out, told her how much she meant to me, did whatever I thought I could to ease her paranoia, short of actually cutting those friends out of my life. But still, she got mad if I ever took time to hang out with friends. Or hell, she’d ramble on about how much she hated them even when I did blow them off for her. Obviously I knew I couldn’t handle this like I would any other person, and that’s kinda why I decided to go ahead with it anyway, but that still didn’t work. I mean, I probably could’ve handled it better, I know that, but somehow I still don’t think I could’ve made it work
Don't say "I still don't think I could've made it work". If she is Yandere, than you play the yandere. Yep, you and her would have the same goal, try to bring yourself being a Yandere. I am not saying be mega crazy, I only say do the same thing so she would be happy. In other words, be the yandere. She would know how much she means to you, and how you means to her, making it a happy ending. There are also many ideas, but these ideals need a lot of effort. If you think you did your best, than you are wrong, give it more, go above your limits for her. Through hard work you get the best results. I for example had to give up my free time in October (Almost 5 hours daily) for her, just be happy and make her better for society. Try to learn from your lesson for the future.

Theeohn Megistus #conspiracy in5d.com

In the beginning of this universe Divine Creator created “Games”. The Game for this Universe was called Polarity Integration. The goal was simple: experience polarity and integrate it; once achieved, reunite with Divine Creator. The players of this game would be the Humanoids and the Reptilians. The Humanoids were given a creation myth which stated that the Humans could colonize any planet they chose, but if they find another race on the planet, they must negotiate a peace treaty and strive for harmony. The Reptilians were given a creation myth that stated that they owned the Galaxy and had the right to colonize any planet they chose. If a non-reptilian race is present, they could and should destroy it. Humans were created right-brain dominant (or feminine polarized), Reptilians left-brain dominant (or masculine polarized).

The Reptiles were given a head start so that their technology would start out superior to the Humans. Their home world was called Aln and was located in the Orion Constellation. The Reptiles already attained space travel when the humans were still swimming in the oceans. The humanoid home world was Avyon in the Vegan star system and existed initially as aquatic primates (the Cetaceans).

When humanoids became advanced enough for space travel about 22 million years ago, they colonized another planet called Avalon. Soon the reptiles arrived and a conflict resulted. They infiltrated the colony with their advanced technology and while courting friendship and trust, sowed the seeds of discord between those that wished to grow spiritually and those that wanted to grow technologically. A civil war ensued and the reptiles supplied both sides with sufficient technology to annihilate themselves. This was round one. The reptiles won.

The Founders of the Game moved some of the humanoids to Sirius B so they could be away from the reptilian interference. Over a very long period of time two groups emerged called the “Etherics” (non- physicals) and the “Physicals.” The Etherics were feminine polarized and the Physicals were male polarized. The Founders then moved the Physicals to Aln, the Reptilians home world and the Etherics were moved to Tiamat, the primordial Earth.

The Reptilians weren’t real happy about the Physical Humanoids showing up on their planet and soon the battles began and the colony was nearly destroyed. Some of the humans were forced into slavery and others went underground and formed the Black League. The Black League managed to escape Aln for Tiamat to join the Etherics.

The Reptilians eventually found out about Tiamat and decided to colonize it. When they arrived, there was a proto-humanoid civilization and the Etherics. The Etherics sent positive energy to the Reptiles in an effort to create a peaceful coexistence and get them to let go of their Creation Myth. It worked well for a very long while. It almost looked like integration had already occurred. There were snake reptiles on one side, dinoid reptiles on the other and the humanoids in the middle. The humanoids had learned farming and were growing enough food to feed the whole planet. This was subsequently called the Great Experiment, the forerunner of planet Earth. This was the first time Etherics had been used to obtain a peaceful coexistence and it was amazingly successful.

However, word got out that a planet existed that was living in peace and harmony and the ruling Orion Reptilians decided to pay a visit. This was, of course, in violation of the Creation Myth and they immediately started sowing the seeds of discord among the Reptiles in an attempt to convince them that the Humanoids were secretly planning their destruction. It took a very long time for the ruling Reptilians to work this plan through because the Etherics kept sending thoughts of love and harmony and the physical humanoids kept sending them food. But ultimately the Creation Myth won out and the Reptiles developed a plan to destroy the humanoids through germ warfare.

The proto-humanoids understood what was happening and decided that they would leave the planet and go to the Pleiades aboard the starship Pegasus and the Etherics would mutate back into the aquatic primates (whales and dolphins) and maintain the biosphere. A plan was devised to rid the planet of the Reptiles through implosions of the underground fusion generators. About 98% of the Reptiles were destroyed in the ensuing world-wide cataclysm but a few survived and were present when the remaining planet was repopulated as Earth. Another small group was given sanctuary aboard the Pegasus and went to the Pleiades. Another group fled to the planet Maldek. This all happened about 8 million years ago.

A long period of peace existed after these events. The land guardianship role was vacant so the cetaceans and spiritual hierarchy began searching for a replacement which they eventually found on the fourth planet of the Vega system, the birthplace of present-day humans. They were aquatic primates at that time but through assistance of the Galactic Guardians their evolution was allowed to jump forward to become the Vegan Humans and subsequently created a new galactic guardian group. This was about 4.5 million years ago. A Galactic Federation was created and in the ensuing migration over 2.5 million years, the Galactic Federation agreed to colonize Earth again. The Earth Colony Hybornea was created in the northern lands near present day Florida (the Earth axis has shifted since then). It was a civilization that existed for nearly a million years beginning two million years ago.

The Lyrans decided that, in order to live in complete harmony, they would eliminate the self-defense function. They did this through genetic engineering. However, it left them defenseless so they developed a warrior race which lived separate from their civilization. They were genetically engineered with enhanced adrenaline output to react more aggressively than natural. However, this change caused an imbalance which limited the ability of this altered being to connect to its creator. These new helpers were unstable and threatening to the civilization that created it. As a solution to the problem the Lyrans exiled the whole population of altered beings to a sparsely inhabited planet in a far-off corner of the galaxy. To ensure this would never be revealed to anyone, they altered all memory of this experience and no records were allowed to be taken. This new planet was called Earth. Humanity was left on this “prison planet” to work out the genetic imbalance through adaptation.

Sometime after humans were marooned on Earth, a different extraterrestrial race arrived and attempted to enslave them. However, they did not comprehend human warlike capabilities and were repulsed. They have been planning retribution ever since and now confer with the present-day hierarchy at the top of the secret societies. The planetary awareness of these beings has been in the form of the beast or Satan or the devil. If their plan is allowed to be completed, the planet could be destroyed. They don’t care, they only want revenge.

A war of liberation broke out on Lyra about 360,000 years ago during which the terrorizing army fled to the Pleiades and took possession of the Hesperides system. The name was changed to the Pleja system in honor of their leader. She led an expedition to the SOL system and took control of Mars, Earth and Malona. Conflict broke out on Malona over control of the planetary government. Earth was evacuated back to Lyra-Vega. The war on Malona ultimately pulverized the planet and caused significant destructions on Mars, Venus and Earth.

A peaceful group of Lyran-Vegans migrated back to Earth many years later and developed a high civilization of Hybornea which lasted 6000 years and was again destroyed by wars. About 53,000 years ago wars again broke out in the Lyran system and a leader named Pelegon came to Earth with 70,000 men to establish another civilization which lasted 10,000 years and ultimately was again destroyed by wars. About 100,000 people fled to the Barnard Star (Beta Centaurus) while Earth was thrown back to the Stone Age.

They returned after 7000 years under the leadership of Atlant to create the great Atlantian civilization. His wife Karyatide created Lesser Atlantis and her father Muras created the great civilization of Mu. These blossomed into a planetary civilization which lasted 18,000 years until, in 13,000 B.C., a group of scientists tried seizing power. They were trying to again create a race to support their violent tendencies. Before the scientists were subdued and escaped back to Beta Centaurus, much of the continent of Atlantis was destroyed.

Two thousand years later this same group returned for revenge under the leadership of Arus (the Barbarian) and his 200 sub-leaders. He conquered Hybornea and began to systematically subjugate the rest of the world by attacking India, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq and surrounding areas. It was Arus and his men who were the “Sons of Heaven” that bred with the Earth females called the “Evas” to create the biblical Adam and Eve,the ancestors of many present-day humans. The descendants of Arus left the planet in 26 A.D. after creating Jmmanuel and implanting the Galactic laws and philosophies in humanity.

The origins of Lemuria began on a continent in what is now the Pacific Ocean around 900,000 B.C. and lasted until 26,000 B.C. It was a Lyrian/Sirian styled civilization with democratic principles of governance. It created a number of daughter empires during its existence; the most important of those was Atlantis (which existed in part, on a huge island-continent in the center of the Atlantic Ocean), the Libyan/Egyptian Empire in Africa and the Yü Empire of central China and Tibet.

Due to the influence of renegade Pleiadians / Centurians (Anunnaki), the Atlanteans began developing a hierarchical society which led to feelings of separateness and superiority. After they were granted equal guardianship of the planet 26,000 years ago by the Lemurians, they began plotting ways to grab the sole guardianship. They found allies in the colonies of Alpha Centauri and the Pleiades mostly through the Galactic Federation outpost colonies that shared the concept of a hierarchical society. They and various Pleiadian and Centaurian rebel-renegades plotted the destruction of Lemuria. Their plan was a technical success; however it resulted in the destruction of one of the Earth’s moons, the entire continent of Lemuria, cataclysmic events over the entire earth and a mini-ice-age.

The Atlantians (with the assistance of the Pleiadian and Centurian Rebels) used space ships with force fields to cause one of the Earths moon’s to spiral inward and just as the moon reached the ‘LaGrange Point’, they blasted it with particle beam weaponry. This resulted in a massive meteor shower over Lemuria with the resulting rupture of its subterranean gas chambers and the sinking of the entire continent. The physical destruction of Lemuria was so complete that nothing remained except legends. This was Great Flood #1.

Atlantis had its beginnings about 100,000 years ago. It was destroyed three times; the last time was coincident with Great Flood #3. In the second incarnation, which began 25,000 years ago, they had made great technological progress which was far greater that anything man has attained today however, it lacked sufficient spiritual development and became locked into materialistic endeavors. They wished to replace the clan structure of Lemurian society with an elite structure. This concept of governance was not well received and resulted in a series of costly civil wars across the entire planet. The clan structure is based on groups of people who all shared the same vision and goals about what should be accomplished in their respective fields. It was similar to our present-day scientist and technical trade-groups, except that these trade-groups also had limited governing authority. It meant that the most knowledgeable people were the ones in charge. It has been the elite form of governance that has been in place on this planet ever since Atlantis came to power 25,000 years ago.

They brought in one of the artificial Maldek moons to help balance the planet. The destruction of one of Earth’s two moons caused an unstable wobble in the Earth. This artificial moon was, in fact, a fully armed battle station. It was also an attempt to signal to the rebellious holdouts that military superiority was at hand which was ready and able to end all civil wars and rebellions. The rebellions instead continued over the entire 10,000 year period of this Middle Empire. There was a period of terrorism, torture and inquisitions. They created a superior ruling class which was sustained by the myth of a god-king. A single supreme god-king ruled over all.

Following the destruction of Lemuria, the Libyan/Egyptian Empire negotiated an understanding that allowed them to maintain some autonomy over their own affairs; however they did have to make some concessions to do this. The only other Empire of significance was the Yü, which refused to bow down to the Atlanteans. They even issued several decrees demanding an apology to the other empires for their careless and inhumane destruction of Lemuria and the subsequent cataclysms.

The Atlanteans, jointly with the Egyptians, countered with demands to rescind the decrees. The Yü Empire refused. The combined forces of the Atlantians, the Egyptians and the renegade Pleiadian Centurian allies forced the remnants of the Yü Empire underground. They still exist today as the Kingdom of Agharta in deep underground caverns beneath the Himalayan Mountains and under present day Tibet. The entrances from Tibet were all closed after China invaded in 1949. It is not clear, but is believed that they were searching for the entrances. Attempts to find it using modern day tunneling equipment have been unsuccessful.

Towards the end of the second Empire, autocratic rule was in full force and the remaining rebel alliance was exiled to southern Europe, to a place called Ionia (Greece) and there they would stay until they renounced their ways and complied with the ruling authority. This rebel alliance consisted of the former ruling elite as well as leading scientists. They decided instead to create a Lemurian style governance with plans to ultimately bring their government back to Atlantis. In other words, they became even more organized and dangerous than before they were exiled.

This did not sit well with the ruling authority of Atlantis. The rebels had defied them at every turn and now they were a greater threat than before. A plan was devised to end the problem by destroying Ionia by a method similar to the way they destroyed Lemuria. The plan required the assistance of the rebel Pleiadians and Centurians. This plot was discovered by the Ionians. The result was that the Ionians were able to counter the attack by interrupting their energy beam from Nibiru and the moon exploded over Atlantis instead. Atlantis therefore was destroyed in much the same manner as it had destroyed Lemuria. The Atlantean subcontinent was reduced to a few scattered islands. One of the two Firmament layers was destroyed as well. This was Great Flood #2. This happened 13,000 years ago.

This event did not completely destroy Atlantis however and attempts were made to reconstitute the civilization with what remained. They developed a crystal technology that was capable of transmitting energy wirelessly over great distances. They used the device to propel and guide airplanes, surface vehicles and submarines. They tapped solar energy and also found a way to tap the collective consciousness of the human mind. They eventually found a way to use the collective mind in harmony with the crystals and the Earth as a power source. The people became subservient to this system of mind and power control against their will (ala “The Matrix”). They also found a way to harness the power of the crystal to rejuvenate a person endlessly. One of the crystals is in the Biblical Ark.

Several thousand years before the first flood, the Anunnaki showed up in a ceremonious fashion and presented themselves as gods from heaven to the Atlantians. They started plugging into the ego-consciousness of the leaders by stimulating and fueling their base desires. New technologies were offered as gifts and in return they would do their bidding in holding influence over their subjects in rather depraved ways. They were instrumental in creating mind-Earth resonance devices and even came up with a way to alter the mind of the people to obey their wishes through a slow-pitched electro-magnetic pulse transmitted through the crystal generator network. This sound, which was inaudible to the human ear, caused a release of neurochemicals (the peptides that influence behavior) that caused irrational emotional states and submission to authority. They began attacking lesser civilizations to conquer and take their resources. Through genetic engineering they also helped develop a mutant human who was disconnected from his higher self. These humans would be unaware of their spirituality and would be much easier to control. These evolved into present-day humans.

The final destruction of Atlantis occurred sometime around 10,000 years ago. There was a conflict in the Middle East between the Rama Empire, the Egyptian Empire and the Sumerian Empire. In an attempt to end the conflict they destroyed some of the crystal temples that held up the Firmament. The idea was to open a hole just big enough to flood the enemy out of their positions. However, there was a simultaneous destruction of multiple temples on both sides which destroyed a sufficient number to cause the entire Firmament to collapse. This caused all of the water ice suspended in the atmosphere to come crashing down in a cascade effect over the entire planet. What remained of Atlantis was gone forever beneath the waves. A significant portion of Atlantis still exists at the bottom of the ocean in the Central Atlantic, off the coast of the Carolinas, the Bahamas and the south-western coast of Cuba. This was Great Flood #3.

The Firmament was created before humans existed. They were placed here by the Game Lords to allow for the development of sentient life approximately thirty-five million years ago. It has been destroyed and repaired many times. It consisted of two layers of water ice that acted as a shield against harmful radiation and caused there to be a uniform climate across the entire Earth surface. The temperature was in the high 70’s near the equator and the low 70’s at the poles. The winds were a modest 5 mph, the skies were always sunny, and there were few clouds, no hard rain, no significant winds and no storms. The ice in the Firmament created a lensing effect which made the Moon, Sun and stars all look bigger than they otherwise appear. The Firmament held about as much water as all the oceans rivers and streams on the planet, so when it came down, it would appear as though the sky was literally falling down.

Of course, the empires of Sumeria, Rama and Egypt were all destroyed in the subsequent flood. This flood spread world-wide to encompass the Americas, Asia, Europe and Africa. Every indigenous culture has a flood story. It rained for 40 days and in that time an entire world civilization was destroyed. What were left were legends and myths of gods and goddesses from an age which was completely erased from the earth. Approximately two million people survived the event on the surface. The Agharta (Lemurian) Empire also survived as they were already protected underground.

The Atlantean rulers and their associates fled to the star system of Hadar (a.k.a. Beta Centauri). The people of Hadar insisted that nothing should be done to save what was left of the human race. An argument ensued with the Pleiadians over the issue but the renegade Pleiadians won out. They intervened and restored many areas including the Middle East (Sumeria), the central valley in Mexico (Maya and other Mesoamerican civilizations), the Indus valley area of India and in North Central China near the city of Xian, and the entire Nile river basin in the land of the Egyptians.

So the restoration of life on this planet was once again in the hands of the same people who caused the problem in the first place. It was their intervention that triggered the destruction of Lemuria, the destruction of Atlantis and the entire world civilization. Through it all, it still didn’t sink into the Pleiadian rebels what they were doing to mankind. In the period 1500 B.C. through 1200 B.C. the renegade Pleiadians were forced to withdraw from direct intervention by the main defense forces of the Pleiadian Star League. This finally brought the “reign of terror” to an end.

The Spiritual Hierarchy was responsible for sending the Christ, Budda, Mohammed, Ahkenaton and other ascended masters to show us “the way the truth and the light”. This planted the seeds of spiritual consciousness. Other attempts to bring back the Sirian/Lemurian style governance included Noah and the Hebrews. Noah didn’t get very far and after the Exodus; the Hebrews instituted the concept of Judges to bring the people a concept of a society led by spiritual beings. However, these attempts failed because the human psyche was not ready for it and it was decided that planting the idea of a Christ consciousness would grow into the human psyche over thousands of years and be ultimately successful. Emperor Constantine modified these teachings in 325 A.D. at the Council of Nicea.

Because of the destruction of the Firmament, a significant amount of damaging radiation has been allowed to hit the planet surface. This causes a disastrous effect on all living things. There was no reasonable chance that humans would be able to survive over the long term independent of outside support with their spiritual selves disconnected.

Most humans don’t know that their primary mission on the planet is to be a guardian of the planet; that without their conscious support of the biosphere in concert with the cetaceans, all life on the planet falls apart, literally. The only thing that’s still holding it together right now is the cetaceans and the Spiritual Hierarchy. A guardian is one who brings in the energies of creation and regulates them for the biosphere. The Earth land guardian is man. It is a very unique process whereby the creative life energies given by the Spiritual Hierarchy are physically transmuted into maintenance life energies. Chanting, singing, dancing, ceremony and meditation are all forms of this process. A guardian must consciously and subconsciously maintain these inter-dimensional energies so that they are dispersed in a proper manner. Using Universal Law, a guardian imagines, then combines this with feeling to create. Children do this instinctively when they play and sing and jump around although this is decidedly less focused.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

Some people claim that Martin Luther King Jr. was not a Communist, even though he did everything possible to promote the Communist's agenda. That's like saying that Hitler was not a murderer because he didn't actually do the killing. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Communist! Martin Luther King was affiliated with 60 Communist Fronts. He openly incited violence under the banner of "nonviolence." King led a bizarre sex life which included acts of shocking perversion. On Jan. 31, 1977 Coretta Scott King obtained a federal court order sealing for 50 years 845 pages of FBI records about her husband, "because its release would destroy his reputation!" Still a cowardly, spineless Congress voted to make King's birthday a national holiday. This is should be an outrage to all Christians. The King Holiday act must be repealed!

The life story of Martin Luther King is shocking and disgraceful from beginning to end. He was born with the name Michael King on Jan. 15, 1929. In 1935 his preacher father, "Daddy" King, decided to name himself after the great Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He announced to his congregation that henceforth he was to be called Martin Luther King and his son Martin Luther King, Jr. "Daddy" King never bothered to have this act legalized in court. Thus, his son's real name is Michael King! The holiday should actually be called Michael King Day!

MickinEngland #fundie christianityboard.com

[when the KJV was made, they didn't have all the resources, the ancient texts that we have today...]

Ah, but when the KJV was made, the writers had a strong fearless mindset, backed by the King himself, whereas a lot of modern translators are cowardly, lukewarm, wishy-washy politically-correct wimps.. ;)
For example the KJV regularly describes heathens as 'heathens', whereas newer translators call them 'nations', such is their disgracefully spineless mindset..

Let Them Eat Cake Award

for callous contempt towards the less fortunate

Senators Chuck Grassley & Orrin Hatch #fundie politicususa.com

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) suggested that rich people deserve tax cuts more than working class people because working class people spend all of their money on booze, women, or movies.

Grassley told the Des Moines Register, “I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing, as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”

In the Republican view of America, there are two classes of people, the deserving rich, and the undeserving everyone else.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) also expressed this view when he said during the tax cut debate that Republicans no longer have the money to pay for children’s health insurance, “[L]et me tell you something: we’re going to do CHIP. There’s no question about it in my mind. It’s got to be done the right way. But we, the reason CHIP’s having trouble is because we don’t have money anymore.”

The problem with the thinking of Grassley and Hatch is that rich people don’t reinvest their tax cuts back into the economy. If a tax cut is given to someone making $25,000-$75,000 a year, they put the money back into the economy. They don’t spend the money on women and booze and Grassley said. They pay bills or make purchases that they have put off for a long time because they couldn’t afford it. They don’t blow the money. Working class people put their tax cuts back into the economy, and benefit businesses.

Grassley was suggesting that working class people lack the morals to deserve a tax cut, and Hatch directly stated that Republicans drained the treasury and let children suffer.

The mentality expressed by Sen. Grassley shows why Republican trickle-down economics always fails. Republicans don’t care that cutting taxes for the rich doesn’t work because they believe that the wealthy are morally superior to everyone else.

Blair Naso #sexist returnofkings.com

The popular narrative today is that women demanded the right to vote and the menfolk just told them no until they got tired of their whining. After all, why wouldn’t a woman want more rights?

Turns out there are plenty of reasons why most women would want their own rights restricted, and they all have to do with women knowing the true nature of women. As the saying goes, “A misogynist is a man who hates women as much as women hate each other.” Women know exactly how terrible they can be. A feminist friend of mine once told me, “I envy men, because you can put two random guys in a college dorm together and they’ll get along, but that never happens with two random girls.”

The anti-suffragist organizations had the same numbers among women in America and the United Kingdom as the suffragist organizations, often even excluding men from joining. More women than men were opposed to women’s suffrage. In fairness, some of these groups supported women’s suffrage in local elections.

But all of them feared the hell that would be spawned from complete women’s suffrage, namely the soft socialism we live in today. Ever notice how everything Obama says is pro-woman but that he’s dialed-down his pro-black agenda? It’s because women are the only fans he still has left. Even the blacks don’t want him anymore.

Here’s a few reasons why women themselves did not want to involve themselves in politics.

Less Than Feminine

It’s unbecoming for a woman to be caught up in the affairs of politics. It just isn’t sexy. Nobody likes an activist. A woman doped up on Fox News or HuffPo is as disturbing as your stepmother screaming at the referee at a high school basketball game.

Women get passionate about things, often that whichever her man is passionate about. This can be a very good thing in the right contexts. In the wrong contexts, it’s terrifying. A friend of mine used to be big into Rush Limbaugh, and he decided to involve his wife in his passion. But she was a psychopath in general, and he became horrified at this terrifying right-wing beast he had created. He saw her general hatred and cruelty magnified in her political views.

[...]

Be as offended as you want, but how many women have you met who were bitter, aggressive, and antagonistic over their political views? Why would a woman want to turn into that? And how many more women than men have you met with that demeanor? Being married to a woman invested in politics or social theory is like being married to that one passive-aggressive co-worker who is best friends with the manager.

Today more women than men vote, especially single women, although married women vote more often than single women. Single women are more likely to vote Democrat than married women, and men are more likely to vote Republican than either of them. Whether it’s the financial support or the moral guidance of a husband, women tend to be right-wing when influenced by a man (hence why the left keeps trying to destroy the nuclear family).

And if you are a man who votes Democrat, then yes, you vote like a girl. And probably the kind of ugly girl no man wants to commit to instead of the young hot Presbyterian Sunday school teacher.

Part of the reason women tend to vote Democrat is because women are terrible with money and math. This is the same reason kids are taught in school to pursue their dream job instead of learning a trade that will provide a secure income.

Bad For The Family

Ultimate History Project writes,

One year later, on April 3, 1914, [Theodore Roosevelt’s cousin-in-law Kate] Roosevelt’s diary mentions Mrs. Martin speaking at the home of Mrs. Henry Seligman, wife of the millionaire banker…According to the Times, Mrs. Martin proceeded to tear to tatters the great new cause. The audience listened to her demolition of the suffrage movement “We are not merely against feminism, but for the family. We cannot reconcile feminism and the family. We hope to hear the sound of women’s feet, walking away from the factory and back to the home.”

Notice the idea of suffrage is connected to women in careers. Ideas do not exist in isolation. The barefoot and pregnant Catholic housewife with five children is a far happier person than the sulky feminist writer who retires to squeeze out a retarded child in her late 30s conceived through in vitro.

Women often don’t transition well from the office to the home, becoming bored and listless after being used to the high energy (and germophobic) environment of work. Furthermore, the reason feminist writers think careers are fulfilling is because writing feminist literature is fun. Most women (and men) don’t have careers—they have jobs where they work at the grocery store and hate life.

This claim that women’s entrance into politics and the workforce would destroy the family was not merely the anti-suffrage position. The suffragists themselves admitted that a war between the sexes was a major reason they wanted the right to vote.

[...]

If you look at history, democracy has rarely worked well. It is not rule by the majority but rule by the loudest. And who is louder than a woman? Who is more passionate? And when women follow others like lemmings, we see that women’s suffrage can quickly become destructive.

True, the monarch could be oppressive, take away your rights, censor speech, enact things that the most people are opposed to, and often make the common people miserable and impoverished. But how is that any different than modern western democracies? At least the monarch could accomplish things. Our government can’t get anything done except throw away money.

Furthermore, the monarch has the all-seeing God, his family legacy, and anxious nobles with small armies breathing down his neck to help make sure he does what’s best for the country. In the democracy, it’s greedy corporations and small minorities of activists who control the political narrative. Which is the lesser evil?

[...]

Progress

We have this idea as a society that we are constantly getting smarter with each generation. Yet if you read old books, you find that man has gradually become stupider over the centuries. Even just 100 years ago, people—both men and women—still had the common sense to not shoot themselves in the foot over women’s issues.

Today we have this sense of rights in general, like we are entitled by God at best and by Nothing at worst to have certain laws in place. Where God or Nothing promised this to us is beyond me.

The liberal atheist believes in these human rights more than anyone, even though he doesn’t believe in a god and therefore has no basis for his natural law philosophy. At the least it would make sense for him to believe in whatever is either the oldest or the most universal morality, but instead most atheists jump ahead to whatever new moral fad will fill the emptiness. Just because religion is the opium of the masses doesn’t mean mankind doesn’t need an opium.

The religious person isn’t any more off the hook. Nowhere in the Bible is tolerance, equality, or democracy mentioned, and I doubt they are very prevalent in other religions. The Bible doesn’t say much about politics, but one could make the best guess that while a king may or may not be appointed by God, a senator or president is clearly appointed by man, and therefore democracy isn’t Biblical.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy #fundie jesusisprecious.org

PHOTO TO RIGHT: Obelisks are erect phallic (penis) symbols related to the Egyptian Sun god, Ra. The four sides of the Washington Monument are aligned with the cardinal directions (i.e., east, west, north, and south). At the ground level each side of the monument measures 55.5 feet in width, which is equal to 666 inches each side. The height of the obelisk is 555.5 feet, which is equal to 6,666 inches. THIS IS THE EXACT RATIO OF KING NEBUCHADNEZZAR'S GOLDEN IMAGE! (which was 90 x 9 feet, a 10-to-1 ratio). Christians have the cross, but Illuminists have their phallic obelisk! The new grand PHALLUS (obelisk) symbol representing the sinister power of the global Illuminati elite is the ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER, replacing the old World Trade Center in New York. The new architectural wonder is exactly 1,776 feet tall, featuring The Great Pyramid in it's design. This evidences that the satanic plot for World Government has existed for millenniums and is perpetrating from generation-to-generation by occult organizations.

Perhaps the most intriguing of all Bible passages is our text verse from Revelation 13:8, which identifies the Man of Sin—the coming Antichrist—with the number “666.” The Bible says “666” is the number of a man! Not just any man, but THE BEAST!!!

Now if that is not strange enough for you, then consider that the most prominent symbol in America, next to the cross of Calvary, is the occult Washington Monument overlooking our nation's capital, which stands 666 feet tall and 666 inches wide. The Washington Monument is an upscale replica of Nebuchadnezzar's obelisk, which stood 90 feet tall and 9 feet wide (a 10-to-1 ratio). This occult symbol full of dark esoteric meaning has overshadowed our nation's highest offices of leadership since 1888 when it was completed (construction began in 1848).

It has always greatly disturbed me as an American and a born-again Christian, that an occult organization known as freemasonry, tightly grips control and reigns supreme over the government of the United States and our highest courts. The symbol is called an “obelisk,” which originates from ancient Egypt, a place of pagan liberalism, ungodly practices, and the still-prevalent today “ancient mystery religion” ...

“The word 'obelisk' literally means 'Baal's Shaft' or Baal's organ of reproduction. This should be especially shocking when we realize that we have a gigantic obelisk in our nation's capital known as the Washington Monument.”

SOURCE: Dr. Cathy Burns, Masonic and Occult Symbols Illustrated

Why would our nation's top leaders choose to use an erect male phallus, which is what the monument represents (signifying occult power), as our nation's symbol? Freemasons are a bunch of weird phallus worshippers! This creepy monument of wickedness appears in literally thousands of movies, tens of thousands of books, and millions of photos. Why the secrecy? Only something sinister and evil must be hidden in darkness! In sharp contrast, Christianity is done openly before all people. John 18:20, “Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing.” We can safely conclude that Jesus was not a member of a secret society. Freemasonry, elite secret societies, the new age movement, all come from the ancient mystery religion of pagan Babylon and Egypt.

kingjameswriter1965 #fundie #conspiracy kjbisjesuschrist.wordpress.com

The Media is the Most Powerful Influence

That is, outside the Word of God in the King James Bible!

Ever notice when you check the weather forecast it’ll say there’s a 30% chance of rain? Have you ever thought of why they never tell you about the 70% chance of sunshine?

Can we say, MIND CONTROL?

Ever wonder why the news always focuses on the negative events in the world? You will NEVER hear them say something good happened (unless there’s an evil ulterior motive). They always gush over which celebrity is getting divorced, or who failed at winning the Grammys, or this actor is now proclaiming he’s gay, or which celeb has the most net worth; while Bible-believing preachers all over the world (the few that there are left) who are reaching thousands of souls for Christ and people are being saved from a Christ-less eternity are deliberately and willfully censored? The media is always negative-bent, that is, they get in the way of you seeing Christ and believing on Him to be saved. This is why you need to hear PREACHING!!

Hold on to your seats. It’s going to get rough. Take a look at this Scripture:

And they come unto him, bringing one sick of the palsy, which was borne of four. And when they could not come nigh unto him for the press, they uncovered the roof where he was: and when they had broken it up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay. When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee. Mark 2:3-5 KJB

Here we see the word “press” with a double meaning. Back then it meant a crowd of people. Today it means the newsmedia. Both meanings allude to the fact that both a crowd and the news and social media get in your way of reaching Christ! And that’s what they proudly do, that is, THEY KEEP YOU FROM GETTING SAVED!! That’s why they always have negative, obscene, filthy, God-hating reports which brainwash you into thinking like them. The media doesn’t report on news to make you wise, they spew propaganda to make you stupid! It’s called mind control! The Devil uses them to keep you far from Jesus Christ and being born again.

Crossforce #fundie disqus.com

everyone believes.
even if they tell themselves that they dont.all they can do is refuse to acknowledge Him

if they refuse to acknowledge in our Lord that leaves a G_d shaped hole in their heart that they will fill with anything.and i do mean anything
in adition progressives have turned off the functioning portion of their brains meaning that they will believe anything literally.
combine this with that hole in their heart and they will fall for anyone or anything in a second flat. look for how many libs believe in global warming. look at how many libs worship carl marx or dead rocks or dinosaur bones or monkeys or the fool occupying the white hut. there are some of them have said that they keep a shrine in their house now to obama. i believe them.

ONLY a belief in Christ Our Lord will shield you from this. ONLY a comitted Christian has the strenght and wisdom to resist following the demons of this world.
they picked their fate.the FACTS are out there if they want to see them. most wont. a few will turn. most wont. they blinded themselves.all the Lord will do is see to it that they follow their delusion off the cliff when the time comes.
i have lib family. my brother and his wife are cardcarrying communists. i cut them off long ago.most of you will have to do the same now or later. it will hurt but it will hurt less than watching them marched to their fate in the Lake when the time comes.cut them off and harden your hearts to them or risk joining them.

Ken Ham #fundie answersingenesis.org

Discovery of King Hezekiah’s Seal Confirms God’s Word

I always get excited when I read about archaeological finds in the Middle East that confirm what God’s Word says. Such discoveries have happened many times over the years. Well, a recent find in Jerusalem gives us a personal look into the greatest king of Judah—Hezekiah, the great reformer. The biblical account of Hezekiah and his religious reforms is personally inspiring and encouraging to me. Last summer I wrote an article for Answers [i]magazine about raising up Hezekiah-type reformers today. I encourage you to read the online version of that article on our website.

Well, in the Old Testament we read of King Hezekiah, one of the greatest kings since David and Solomon. Living about 700 years before Christ, his greatness came from the fact that “he did what was right in the sight of the Lord, according to all that his father David had done” (2 Chronicles 29:2). Because he loved the Lord, this king of Judah “did what was good and right and true before the Lord his God. And in every work that he began in the service of the house of God, in the law and in the commandment, to seek his God, he did it with all his heart. So he prospered” (2 Chronicles 31:20–21). He destroyed the idols (2 Chronicles 31:1), purified the Temple and restored the sacrifices (2 Chronicles 29), and started celebrating Passover once again (2 Chronicles 30). Second Kings 18:5 says of him, “Hezekiah trusted in the Lord, the God of Israel. There was no one like him among all the kings of Judah, either before him or after him.”

Events from the reign of King Hezekiah have already been confirmed by archaeology. Second Chronicles 32:2–4 and 2 Kings 20:20 mention Hezekiah’s tunnel, dug to prepare for an Assyrian siege (a siege God supernaturally kept from happening in 2 Kings 19:25–36), and it’s still part of Jerusalem’s water system today. The Bible mentions that Sennacherib laid siege to the Judean city of Lachish and conquered it (2 Kings 18:13), was defeated in Jerusalem, and then was killed by his sons in the temple of his god (2 Kings 19:37). Both the siege of Lachish and his death have been confirmed by archaeology.

Well, archaeology now offers us a more personal touch from Hezekiah. In the rubbish heap outside a royal building in Jerusalem, a tiny seal impression, called a “bulla,” was discovered. Barely half an inch wide, this seal reads, “Belonging to Hezekiah, [son of] Ahaz, king of Judah.” Eilat Mazar, a third-generation archaeologist who directed the dig, says, “The seal of the king was so important. It could have been a matter of life or death, so it's hard to believe that anyone else had the permission to use the seal. Therefore, it's very reasonable to assume we are talking about an impression made by the King himself, using his own ring.” This is the first seal bearing King Hezekiah’s name ever discovered by an archaeologist (others have been sold on the antiquities market, but they were not discovered by archaeologists, so their authenticity is questionable). It offers a personal look into King Hezekiah since the seal probably came from the ring on his finger. Take a look at a photograph of this seal.

This incredible find confirms God’s Word yet again. Isn’t it exciting being a Christian and seeing how science is constantly confirming the truth of God’s Word? Of course, since the Bible is real recorded history, this is exactly what we should expect—and it’s exactly what we see!

You can read more about archaeology and God’s Word in this chapter from The New Answers Book 1, “Does Archaeology Support the Bible?

Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying,
Ken

This item was written with the assistance of AiG’s research team.

Avi Sion #fundie thelogician.net

Homosexuals are cunningly using all the tools provided them by a simplistic and fallacious interpretation of democracy to further their subversive cause. They are an educated and wealthy lobby group, numerous and influential enough to affect national legislatures and international bodies. Judging by their successes in North America and Europe, they will very soon manage to obtain in Israel all the legal freedom they desire to corrupt many, many young Jews. Do not be surprised if, moreover, they in time demand that the Torah’s anti-homosexual verses be censored.

But there is one, just one, way to stop these loathsome people from progressing further, in the Jewish world at least. It is that all rabbinical authorities in Israel (and indeed, in the world) convene and together declare all evident homosexuals and homophiles to be no longer Jewish. Only such a powerful ban can put the fear of G-d in some of these people’s hearts, and only the leading rabbis (the orthodox and traditional ones, at least) have the institutional and moral power to do it.

The terms ‘Jewish’ and ‘homosexual’ must be understood by everyone to be antitheses, contradictory terms. There can be no such thing as a “Jewish homosexual”: such a concept is shameful to all decent Jews. Normal Jews do not want to be associated with homosexuals, even in thought. Such behavior is the depth of depravity, something incompatible with Judaism. Let it be known far and wide: if you are a Jew, you cannot be a homosexual; and if you are a homosexual, you cannot be a Jew.

If someone publicly acknowledges being a homosexual in the media, or admits to being a homosexual in front of two or more witnesses, then that person should be formally banned from the Jewish religion (for examples: Dana Olmert, the current PM’s daughter, and various reform and conservative so-called “rabbis”).

If, moreover, someone by word or deed publicly takes a stand in favor of homosexuality or homosexual “rights”, then that person should likewise be declared excluded from the Jewish religion (for examples: certain judges of the Supreme Court of Israel, certain Members of the Knesset, certain academics and journalists).

What does excommunication mean? If it is a man, he will no longer be counted as part of a minyan or be called up to the Torah, or granted any of the duties and privileges normally granted to Jews. If it is a woman, any children she bears thenceforth will not be recognized as Jews. Moreover, such people should not be allowed in Yom Kippur services or be buried in Jewish cemeteries.

Such exclusions may be difficult to administrate and enforce in practice, but the theoretical message they convey is important and effective anyway. A rabbinical court would have to decide each case, and a centralized blacklist would have to be maintained.

Daniel Silva #fundie quora.com

Ignoring the insane amount of misinformation that atheists and agnostics spread whenever these questions are asked (I don’t know why people who don’t believe in Christianity spend so much time trying to disprove it), Jesus did fulfill every prophecy written about him, he just didn’t do it in the way people expected him. But people without the spirit of God will never understand how God thinks, and therefore will always be relegated to dismiss anything that isn’t literal or physical.

“The Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God. For who among men knows the thoughts of man except his own spirit within him? So too, no one knows the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God. We have not received the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we may understand what God has freely given us. And this is what we speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom, but in words taught by the Spirit, expressing spiritual truths in spiritual words.

The natural man does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God. For they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned. The spiritual man judges all things, but he himself is not subject to anyone’s judgment. “For who has known the mind of the Lord, so as to instruct Him?” But we have the mind of Christ.” - 2 Cor. 2:11

People who refuse to let God be God except by conformity to their physical senses, will never understand what the Bible is actually saying. So they will always see contradictions and lies because they’ve chosen to reject the only means by which we can see anything else.

The clearest example I saw of this misinformation in another person’s post was the claim that Jesus missed building the third temple. Like the blind, unspiritual religious leaders of Jesus’ day, people who claims like this are unable to think outside of the what they can see and touch, so if there’s not an physical building, a literal temple built, they just write it off as another religious lie.

On the contrary, Jesus said in John 2,

“Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up again.”

And just like these religious critics that are clueless about spirituality, and having no relationship with the Spirit are ignorant of how God was working through Jesus, the leaders snapped back at Jesus with what? An objection based on a physical temple.

“This temple took forty-six years to build,” the Jews replied, “and You are going to raise it up in three days?”

But what does it say next? Verse 25,

“But Jesus was speaking about the temple of His body.”

Christ himself is the third and final temple. Further, in Christ, we too become that temple of God.

“Don't you realize that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, who lives in you and was given to you by God? You do not belong to yourself,” - 1 Cor. 6:19

Jesus did rebuild the third temple, and he made it out of humanity itself, instead of building yet another out of dead rocks.

Next this critic in another answer says that Jesus failed to gather all the Jews back to the land of Israel.

Jesus said in John 12:32, “And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.”

The Apostle Paul says over and over in his writings that there’s no longer a distinction between Jew and Gentile (non-Jew), but that now we are all one in Christ.

In his letter to the Galatians, Paul says that “Jews” are not “Jews” because they are physical descendants of Abraham, but “true Jews” (or “true children of Abraham”) and “true Israel” are all those who are justified just as Abraham was, “by faith.”

Are you seeing the pattern?

It’s not about the physical, literal definitions of fulfillment we’ve come to accept and expect by our standards, and it’s not knowable in the ignorance we try to pass of as intelligence. It’s why it comes off as foolish to all the self-proclaimed intellects, but becomes the wisdom of God for all the losers of the world that can admit they’ve been hopelessly ignorant all along.

Are you seeing the other pattern?

Jesus is the third temple…

…annnnnd..

Jesus is the “land of Israel.”

Jesus is the one who has done it all. He does the fulfilling, he does the drawing, he does the saving, he does the justifying. He is the “author and the finisher,” “the beginning and the end,” the “alpha (first) and the omega (last),” and everything in between.

“The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in Him all things were created, things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities. All things were created through Him and for Him.

He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. And He is the head of the body, the church; He is the beginning and firstborn from among the dead, so that in all things He may have preeminence. For God was pleased to have all His fullness dwell in Him, and through Him to reconcile to Himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through the blood of His cross.

Once you were alienated from God and were hostile in your minds because of your evil deeds. But now He has reconciled you by Christ’s physical body through death to present you holy, unblemished, and blameless in His presence— if indeed you continue in your faith, established and firm, not moved from the hope of the gospel you heard, which has been proclaimed in all creation under heaven, and of which I, Paul, have become a servant.” - Col. 1:15

All a human has to do is say “yes” instead of no. They don’t even have to get rid of any baggage, they just have to loosen their grip on it enough for him to.

The only thing Jesus doesn’t do is the judging and condemning. People do that in their demand to be judged by anything other than the work of Jesus that “takes away the sin of the world.” Want to keep and be judged according to your record of good works and so-called intellect? Well, in your file of good deeds (and I bet they are many!) there is also a record of bad deeds. And in your file of witty intellect (you smart all-knowing somebody!), there is also a boatload of ignorance. If you demand to be judged by the good, you demand to be judged by the bad. And contrary to what we think of ourselves, the record of our bad deeds sticks against us harder than the good, because even much of our so-called good is twisted by impure motives.

“Yes, I robbed the liquor store, judge, but I also held the door for a lady on the way out!”

Good luck!

On the other hand, if you give up your insistence to be accepted and noticed based on your own goodness, if you let the record of your good be thrown into the fire, with it goes your record of your bad. If you choose God’s goodness over your own then there isn’t a single stroke of the pen to stand against you because, like Jesus did long ago, you’ve finally considered every record (the good and bad) as dead as he became on the cross. A dead man is good for nothing, and so is your record of deeds.

“He forgave us all our trespasses, having canceled the debt ascribed to us in the decrees that stood against us. He took it away, nailing it to the cross!” Col. 2:14

This is how he draws all people to himself, by the forgiveness of sins; the letting go of people’s offenses; the burning of the record books.

People judge and condemn themselves by the insistence that they be judged according to their records of good, instead of God’s absence of records altogether. Those are people who love their records so much they’d dive into a burning fire for all eternity just to salvage a few scraps.

His one and only requirement is faith. And that doesn’t mean to pound your chest, squint your eyes, and concentrate really hard on believing. Faith is a yes or no question: yes, for Jesus to be the all-doer he already is. Or no, to continue insisting that you yourself fulfill all the requirements he already did (hint: you stand a snowball’s chance in hell).

Back to it. In his drawing all people to himself through the forgiveness of sins, and in his one and only simple requirement being that a person has faith, he is fulfilling the prophecy of gathering all the Jews (children of Abraham being those who have faith) back to the land of Israel (himself).

“That’s cheating! That’s a stretch!”

No. He is “the lamb that was slain before the foundation of the world.”

This was the plan all along. It was people who assumed (and therefore demanded) that it be done according to their limited standards and expectations. No imagination, no willingness to have fun and play, just like the the by-the-book, by-the-letter party-poopers that killed him. :P

“You’re supposed to rebuild a physical temple!”

“I did. It’s me, in the flesh! Oh? You assumed I meant another building made out of bricks and mud and gold? I had something way more beautiful in mind!”

“Well, you said you would gather all the children of Abraham back to Israel!”

“Did that, too! I’m Israel, and the children of Abraham is anyone who believes. Oh? You thought I meant only Jews by nationality? Jews by religion? Oh no, my friend! You’re thinking too small again! I didn’t want a reason to exclude anyone, like you sticklers are always trying to do to each other, so I made it easy for anybody to get in. All you gotta do is check “yes” on the dinner reservation! Faith is nothing more than a RSVP to the party I’m throwing! Say yes and I’ll even pick you up personally!”

Look how it works though: when he refused to do it their way, what did they do? They killed him. And when he continued to refuse to do it their way, what did they do? They jumped on Quora and started spreading a bunch of misinformation based on their own lack of understanding of what the Bible actually says about him. :P

But regardless of the lies people perpetuate, Jesus has very much kept with the program he set in motion from the very beginning, fulfilling each and every prophecy (I’m not going to detail all 300 of them on Quora, but that might be a fun idea for a new book!). He just decided to have a little fun and be creative like creators do, and people decided to do what they do whenever someone colors outside the lines.

“You can’t do that!”

“Actually, it’s my creation, I can do it any way I want. Don’t like it? There’s a nice corner of outer darkness for you to throw your tantrum in. But you certainly aren’t going to ruin my party by throwing your temper tantrum in front of my guests.”

If your life’s mission is to poop on parties and discredit anything and everything with even the slightest association to religion, then you’ve already decided that Jesus didn’t fulfill a single prophecy, and maybe even that there’s no proof that he existed at all. That’s not because the evidence is missing, it’s because you’re missing the evidence.

passionatepentecostal #fundie passionatepentecostal.wordpress.com

Now I will jump right on in to our reasons for not cutting our hair:

1. God made man and woman with specific differences and hair is one of those features. Rev 9:8 – “And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions.” This shows that women have a certain type of hair and that it is different from men’s.

2. 1 Cor 11, the majority of the chapter is like a holy grail about hair! So much is mentioned in this so I will go into some of it…

~We should be covered in order to have power and because of the angels (verse 10). Note, hair does not have power in itself, but it is a visible symbol of our power we have through God.

~Verse 15 says that hair is a covering! By wearing long, uncut hair we are submitting to God. As “Covered By Love” says so well “a woman’s outer covering reveals an inner acceptance of God’s plan. By her conduct, of her own free will, she gains power on her head.” God covers the things that He loves and are valuable to Him. (I should mention that while the verse does say “long hair” this means uncut hair, and is not referencing any type of set length. Hair is long if it is allowed to grow without cutting. So you could have 10 inches of uncut hair and it would be “longer” than 30 inches of cut hair. The length of the hair is not a judge for how “holy” that woman is.)

~Verse 5-6 say “but every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.” This means that if we cut our hair it is a dishonor to pray or prophesy uncovered, and since 1 Thessalonians 5:17 says to “pray without ceasing” then we must have a never-ending covering on our heads aka our hair! Another thing I’ve learned is that the “shame” mentioned in verse 6 comes from the Greek word for “filthy” or “disfigurement” (much like if we cut off an arm we are disfigured, so too if we cut off our hair!)

~In verse 10 Peter says “for this cause ought the woman to have power on her head,” notice the use of “ought” and not “must.” The Greek for “ought” means “owe,” be in debt for,” or “that which is due.” So we women can CHOOSE to give God what He is owed or due.

3. We use hair to express what we are so to say. Rockers, goths, preps, hippies, they all have signature hairstyles to show what they believe in. So in a way, our hair is helping us to stand out and show people that we believe in and worship God. Our hair separates us from the world and sets us apart for God.

4. Biblical examples of women cutting or losing their hair are not not happy ones. In biblical times women never cut their hair, it was their greatest ornament, and if cut it was the greatest humiliation to the woman. Isaiah 3:24 is about how the daughters of Zion were “haughty” and “wanton” so He turned their “well set hair to baldness.” Jer 7:29- “Cut off thine hair, O Jerusalem, and cast it away, and take up a lamentation on high places; for the Lord hath rejected and forsaken the generation of his wrath.” Ezekiel 7:18 – “They shall also gird themselves with sackcloth, and horror shall cover them; and shame shall be upon all faces, and baldness upon all their heads.” I do not want to be like those women!
I get silly comments from people frequently so here is some biology for you (because I AM a bio major, haha) = cutting your hair does not make it grow faster, cutting does not affect the health of the hair at all because hair grows inside the skin! Before hair even reaches the outside of the body it is dead, densely packed keratin. Cutting your hair does not make it longer for two reasons. First, it is obviously removing length from the hair, and second, hair has a programmed “terminal length” that it will not grow past no matter how often you trim it. Bam, biology!

By choosing to not cut our hair we are submitting to and obeying God and gaining glory, power, and a connection with angels. Wow. By letting our hair grow to its natural length we wear a covering that God made specifically for us, and I don’t want to alter what God made. We do not chose not to cut our hair in order to follow God, rather we follow God so we chose not to cut our hair. Think about that for a second…

I hope this helped you to better understand the Apostolic women’s choice to not cut their hair and I hope this blessed you in some way! Please feel free to comment!

David Pomeroy #fundie deseretnews.com

First of all, polygamy is not a "nontraditional" marriage. It has been practiced since the days of Abraham and is still considered religiously acceptable by various Jewish and Muslim sects. Even though it is not socially acceptable in the United States today, it is still a union between a man and a woman.

Secondly, just because polygamy played a big role in the history of the LDS Church doesn't mean it is the focal point of the church's success. Faith in the Lord is the only focal point, period. And lastly, I can't understand how anyone can be so discouraged over something so trivial as the church's position on homosexuality. Whatever happened to the concept of "When the Lord speaks, the debate ends"?

white_usa_ #racist stormfront.org

We have made a genuine effort to understand Jews, their value system and their religion by inviting them to provide expert opinion on peculiar aspects of Jewish culture that we don’t seem to be able to understand.

But ladies and gentlemen—they wouldn’t talk!

Meanwhile, we came up with another question: Why do Jewish religious texts and holidays often glorify massacres of the innocent?

The Passover celebrates murder of every firstborn son in Egypt, from Pharaoh’s, to that of the female slave and even cattle! Except, of course, Jewish first-born sons, who were “passed over”.

What kind of people would murder children and then elevate that horrible act into one of their biggest holidays?

When they conquered Canaanite towns and cities, such as Jericho, Jews murdered every human being, men, women and children, including their cattle. Then they bragged about it in the Torah!

Murdering goyim children comes completely natural to Jews!

In the Massacre of the Innocent, Jewish King Herod ordered the execution of all young boys in the vicinity of Bethlehem, so as to avoid the loss of his throne to a newborn King. If an opportunity presents itself, Jews will murder [and, of course, ritually rape] their own children too!

Purim celebrates the murder of Haman and his sons. Traditional holiday food consists of pastries in the shape of Haman’s ears [Hamantaschen or Oznei Haman]. Does that seem normal to you?

Alan Ives #fundie momof9splace.com

First of all, our God is holy, and He said that the definition of beauty is something that is holy. No young lady, no matter how beautiful she may be thought of in her face, is beautiful if she is not holy. No thing that man ever created, no matter how skillfully it was crafted, is a beautiful work of art if it wasn't made to be holy. Beauty and holiness go together.

Now this is true when it comes to music and the playing of instruments. Every instrument was made to be played beautifully. God gave the Jews music. God gave King David the ability to make instruments, and the Jewish community today, though they are the enemies of the Gospel, still have a shred of what King David had. Many of the classical musicians are Jewish. If you want to hear how a violin should be played, listen to a Jewish man play it. If you want to hear what an oboe should sound like, listen to a Jewish man play that oboe.

The "Am I Being Detained" Award

Sir, Am I being Detained? SIR!

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Christ detained by Satan 6 centuries prior being Jesus?!

I wonder why nobody wants to address the detention of Christ with the 'king of Persia'?

Read this first (short masterpiece reading):

Thread: BOMBSHELL: Christ was on earth before being Jesus!


Dan 10:13

But the prince of the Persian kingdom resisted me twenty-one days. Then Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, because I was detained there with the king of Persia.


Christ was detained WITH the 'king of Persia', together, as stated in Dan 10:13.

Except that history never reported such detention of the king of Persia which was Cyrus the Great at the moment Christ met Daniel.


[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]


Why did the prince of the Persian kingdom resist Christ 21 days?

What could the word 'resist' means?

Who was the prince of the Persian kingdom at the time of Cyrus?


The son of Cyrus the Great was Cambyses II.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Bardiya is said to be an imposter who ruled few months.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]


20 So he said, “Do you know why I have come to you? Soon I will return to fight against the prince of Persia, and when I go, the prince of Greece will come;

This is not the king but the prince of Persia that Christ would fight against.

Why would Christ fight Cambyses II in the End Times supposedly being the moment Christ returns to defeat Satan.

Who else could Christ fight against?

Is the Son of God involved in minor fights against minor princes?


There is another version that could well be the real one.

Nebbuchadnezzar was the king of Babylon who invaded Israel and subdued its king who was deported to Babylon. Daniel was a noble from the royal Israelite family. He wrote his book from Babylon in captivity. He cites Nebbuchadnezzar and Belshazzar, son of Nabonidus.

In Daniel's book, some kings are missing between Nebbuchadnezzar/Belshazzar of Babylon and Cyrus the Great, then Darius I, of Persia. These missing kings are:

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Amel-Marduk
Nergal-shar-usur
Labashi-Marduk

and Nabonidus, particularly known with the Nabonidus Chronicle.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Nabonidus was king and father of Belshazzar cited by Daniel in Dan 8 as king of Babylon, instead of his father Nabonidus!

Why is Nabonidus forgotten?


While the three first kings after Nebbuchadnezzar (42 years of reign) ruled only for 4 years (3 kings in four years), Nabonidus, having left the capital for a long period, ruled
17 years through his son Belshazzar, staying in Babylon, for a while.

Wikipedia says about Nabonidus: Last Mesopotamian king of Babylon, originated in Harran in Assyria. Was not a Chaldean, often left rule to his son Belshazzar.

So, remember that Nabonidus was the last king of Babylon before the invasion of the Persian king Cyrus the Great while Daniel was in captivity in Babylon.

In the page of Wikipedia about Cyrus we can read this:

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

It is probable that Cyrus engaged in negotiations with the Babylonian generals to obtain a compromise on their part and therefore avoid an armed confrontation. Nabonidus was staying in the city at the time and soon fled to the capital, Babylon, which he had not visited in years.[62]

Two days later, on October 7 (proleptic Gregorian calendar), Gubaru's troops entered Babylon, again without any resistance from the Babylonian armies, and detained Nabonidus.


Here is more about Nabonidus:

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]


HERE WE ARE!

WE HAVE A KING DETAINED IN CYRUS' PERIOD. IT HAPPENS THAT CYRUS WAS MADE KING OF BABYLON AFTER NABONIDUS' REIGN!


On October 29, Cyrus himself entered the city of Babylon and detained Nabonidus.
.../...

After taking Babylon, Cyrus the Great proclaimed himself "king of Babylon, king of Sumer and Akkad, king of the four corners of the world" in the famous Cyrus cylinder, an inscription deposited in the foundations of the Esagila temple dedicated to the chief Babylonian god, Marduk.

What the links provided say is that Nabonidus has been downplayed by the Babylonians priests of Marduk and Cyrus himself, considered as a Messiah in Isaiah's texts by the Jews.

NABONIDUS HAS UNDERGONE A SMEAR PROPAGANDA BY THE ONE SEEN AS A MESSIAH BY THE JEWS.

IS IT THE REASON FOR THE CONFUSION BETWEEN THE PRINCE OF PERSIA - IN FACT CYRUS THE GREAT NOT KING OF BABYLON YET - AND THE KING OF 'PERSIA' WHO WOULD BE IN FACT THE KING OF BABYLON - INSTEAD OF PERSIA - DETAINED BY CYRUS...WITH CHRIST?

THIS GIVES US A VERY NEW VISION OF CHRIST DETAINED WITH NABONIDUS, KING OF BABYLON (NOT PERSIA) BY CYRUS - THE PRINCE OF PERSIA - WHO THEN IS IN FACT SATAN INCARNATED...REVERED BY THE JEWS FOR HIS DECISION TO SET THE JEWS FREE!

The point now to understand is why the Jews mistranslated Babylon for Persia. Is it to follow orders from Cyrus the Great to better hide the presence of Christ with Nabonidus in prison because of Cyrus WHO WOULD BE THE PRINCE OF PERSIA WHOM CHRIST WILL FIGHT AT THE END TIMES AND RESISTED CHRIST 21 DAYS?

ONLY A SUPERNATURAL BEING COULD RESIST CHRIST'S POWER. THIS COULD ONLY BE CHRIST, UNFORTUNATELY DETAINED WITH NABONIDUS!


In case I wasn't clear enough, the point is that:

1) the Prince of Persia was Cyrus the Great, KING OF PERSIA. He resisted Christ for 21 days. Cyrus the Great was actually Satan that Christ must fight in the End Times.


2) the King of Persia was Nabonidus, actually KING OF BABYLON. He was actually detained by Cyrus the Great just before the latter become King of Babylon. The detention with a king that Christ speaks about is therefore REAL.


3) The mistranslations - king of Persia instead of King of Babylon (Nabonidus) as well as Prince of Persia instead of King of Persia (Cyrus the Great) - reflects a purposedly smear campaign against Nabonidus by Cyrus the Great seen as Messiah by the Jews through Isaiah's words, to better confuse the readers and make Nabonidus forgotten.


4) Since Christ was detained by Cyrus the Great WITH Nabonidus, King of Babylon, it means that Christ was incarnated BEFORE being Jesus for the detention necessarily occured on the physical plane!


5) the point 4 above explains why the angel Michael had to set Christ free. Christ should have been abducted by an angel - only supporter of Christ at that time according to his own words - and freed from his incarnated body (Daniel saw him in his glorious body in Dan 10) like Christ was freed from Jesus' body when John saw Christ in Rev 1.


6) the abduction of Christ should have occured like the ones reported in numerous cases of angels' interventions as stated in this thread:

Thread: The RAPTURE is UFO related.


7) Christ's incarnation in Daniel's time remains a mystery...but should be related to Nabonidus' detention. Who was Christ (incarnated) to the King of Babylon? One clue lies in the mysterious and supernatural handwriting on the wall in Dan 5 intended to Belshazzar, Nabonidus' son:


25 “This is the inscription that was written:

mene, mene, tekel, parsin

26 “Here is what these words mean:

Mene: God has numbered the days of your reign and brought it to an end.

27 Tekel: You have been weighed on the scales and found wanting.

28 Peres: Your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians.”

30 That very night Belshazzar, king of the Babylonians, was slain,

31 and Darius the Mede took over the kingdom, at the age of sixty-two.

Here we see how historically wrong is this last verse for the new king of Babylon was Cyrus, NOT Darius who came well after Cyrus the Great almost ten years later after two other kings.

The same way, Belshazzar is presented as the son of Nebbuchadnezzar instead of Nabonidus in Dan 5.


Again an attempt to dismiss Nabonidus and confuse the readers.

I believe Christ being close to Nabonidus who was far from his son. One must ask why...

ChristExtra #fundie godlikeproductions.com

The Two Beasts of the Apocalypse

[...]

The two Beasts of the Apocalypse are two British institutions: the Monarchy and the City of London which coats of arms are described by the angel to John. Crown and UNIcorn in the British monarchy coat of arm, and dragons and TWO horns like a lamb in the City of London coat of arm.

They represent the two powers, political and financial, leading the world to disaster, under the control of the evil.

[...]

In another article (still to come here), mention is made of the number 666 which is simply the number of talents of gold that King Solomon (the number of a man in most versions) asked his people to give him every year for his needs and necessities. This second beast is directly related to the power of money. The mark of the second beast is the credit card and its PIN code. ATMs (automatic money distributors) have all the card reader on the right side (even lefties have to use the right hand on/in which the mark is). The brain's working memory necessary for the use of the PIN code is located in the prefrontal cortex (the mark on/in the forehead ), the word 'on' (the right hand and forehead) indicating that this brand is apart from the human nature.

[...]

17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

This verse speaks of Satan who will come in the body of a human being, that of Prince Harry for the first time in many years. People will wonder about the new behavior Harry in 2018 that signs have already anticipated.

17:9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.

The seven mountains are a figure of speech to describe the most powerful empire in history, passed from kings George to other kings George of this dynasty. Most of the people are looking for a city with seven hills when in fact it is CLEARLY WRITTEN JUST AFTER THAT...

17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.

This verse is very clear. The seven heads are kings! No presidents, chancellors, emirs or prime ministers. The common mistake is to think that the 7 kings, or the 10 kings, must exist at the same time, that they must be contemporary. But NOTHING like this is said. The proof? Five kings have fallen into the verse 17:10 above! ON THE CONTRARY, they no longer exist. They belong to the past!

This verse is important to know when the End Times begins. The five kings George have fallen, from George I to George V. Whoever exists is George VI through his daughter Queen Elizabeth II, the current reigning queen (queens are not counted in this vision since God promised kings in the line of David). That of the king George still to come is Prince Charles. It will rule a very short time (a few months) on the throne.

17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

If the beast in question is among the 7 it is that it is of the same lineage, he is the son of the 7th King George (Prince Charles). This is where we see that Satan will incarnate in the body of Prince Harry (in what is called a walk-in ) that will become the eighth king because the line will be discontinued with the couple William and Kate who will be killed by this eighth king after they will be asked (as the fourth horseman period) to have the authority over a quarter of the world - the Commonwealth being precisely a quarter of the surface of the Earth - like all the British monarchs.

This short time of authority over the Commonwealth will come during the Third World War which will begin in spring 2016. William & Kate will then renounce the privileges due to their rank. But because of their divine powers that they will get soon (for the second seal, in the second period of their ministry, those of the Red Horseman between October 14, 2014 and March 30, 2015) they will be called in the Western world to counter the invasion from the Eastern Europe. And of course, Christ will fight the Antichrist! It will be the nephew (Prince George) against his uncle (Prince Harry).

17:12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.

Again, it is clearly stated that the 10 horns are 10 kings. And nothing else! These 10 kings are those of the British monarchy, which began with the Act of Union and George I. But note the subtlety. How is it that these 10 kings have not yet received a kingdom as they receive authority as kings one hour with the beast? Although strange situation!

The key is that the 10 horns (the unicorn in the coat of arm) belong to the red dragon of Wales corresponding to the status of Princes of Wales, FUTURE KINGS of UK. So, technically, as a red dragon, these princes have not yet any realm. But when they are kings, they reign for one hour. What is it this time? What is the Beast?

The Beast, the first, is simply the British monarchy which has meaning only with its kings (and queens). The hour of this verse is the Hour of God whose day is not made of 24 hours but 60 hours as the Sumerian tradition prescribes since 60 was the mathematical basis of the Sumerian gods (hence 60 minutes and 60 seconds). As a day of God equal to 1000 years, an hour of God equal to 1000: 60 = 16,666 (16.7). But 16,9 years is precisely the average time of reign of the 10 (not 7 George) British monarchs! Note also that the kingdom of UK has 16 nations and territories.

17:13 These have one mind, and shall give their power and authority to the beast.

The two beasts give full power to Harry, aka Satan, in 2018, after the death of William & Kate!

James Stenzel #racist jewwatch.com

In the Georgian language "shvili" means son of, or son, as in Johnson. "Djuga" means Jew. Therefore Djugashvili means Jewison.

So Joe Stalin's real name, before he changed it, was Joe Jewison. It gets better, his name was Joseph David Djugashvili, a typical Jewish name. During his revolutionary days he changed his name to "Kochba", the leader of the Jews during one of the anti-Roman uprisings of the Jews. Russians don't change their names. Georgians don't change their names. Jews change their names.

mexangl716 #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Where Does the "Big Bang Theory" say the animals got their names?

The Bible says that God brought the animals to Adam for him to name in Genesis 2:19. By naming all of the animals, Adam demonstrated that he was master over them, as God gave man dominion over all of his creatures.

Biblical Examples

The Bible indicates that when someone names another person or thing, it shows that he has power over them. For example, you'll find the Pharaoh renaming one of the kings of Judah.

Then Pharaoh Necho made Eliakim the son of Josiah king in place of his father Josiah, and changed his name to Jehoiakim (2 Kings 23:14).

There is also the episode of the Babylonians renaming Daniel and his three friends when they were brought captive to Babylon (Daniel 1).

Anyway, my point is, that our God is a God of order. Scripture even says by the mouth of God himself that "Let all things be done decently and in order. 1 Cor 14:40. The account of Creation was done exactly as written. Creation is a fact, It has already occured and God, Elohim the creator and sustainer of all life is maker of all things! He is INDESCRIBABLE! God says Adam, the first man named all creatures. What do the other theories say about where we got names for the creatures? Does anyone have that type of information? Christians have the Word of God which I can confidently say is the truth concerning all things. If you want the truth, The Holy Bible is where to find it. God bless!

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

What does THE TRUTH mean to you dear reader? I am being your friend right now. I am telling you THE TRUTH! The inspired words of God for English-speaking people today are preserved in the King James Bible! WE HAVE AN INSPIRED BIBLE TODAY IN THE KING JAMES!!! And may I say, the King James is not just another “version,” it is THE HOLY BIBLE! It is the Sacred Book! The King James Bible is not one of many, it is one of a kind! If you speak English and don't have a King James Bible, you don't have God's inspired Words! Thank God for the inspired Words of God. I FIND NO FAULT IN THE KING JAMES BIBLE!!!!!!!

Psalms 119:140, “Thy word is very pure: therefore thy servant loveth it.”

The psalmist loved God's Word because it is VERY PURE! David would have loathed, hated, rejected and exposed the hundreds of counterfeit Bible versions flooding the Bible market today worldwide. David would have rounded them all up and burned them, as I wish I could do!

Either We Have An Inspired Bible Today Or God is a Worthless Liar

I don't understand how some preachers live with themselves, believing that at very best all we have today is a corrupt King James Bible, and nothing better. If that is the best God can do, screw Him! I mean, if our omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, omnisapient and omnibenevolent God is so impotent that He could not preserve His very pure words as He promised in Psalms 12:6-7, then God is a big liar and fraud, and I don't want anything to do with a manmade Bible that has a bunch of mistranslations and errors in it! If I truly believed that, I would become an agnostic, and reasonably so, since no one really knows what the hell the truth is! I FIND NO FAULT IN THE KING JAMES BIBLE, and I feel sorry for those who do! God made humanity a solemn promise in Psalms 12:6-7, “The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.”

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

KAT DENNINGS IS A REPTILIAN!!! and she lied about being of full Jewish ancestry!

She said herself, "I’m a billion percent Jewish, I don’t think I have any relatives who aren’t Jewish”

SHE IS ONLY SAYING THAT SHE IS SOOO ETHNICALLY JEWISH TO COVER UP THAT SHE KNOWS SHE HAS NON JEWISH ANCESTORS! AND PROBABLY HAS A LOT OF NON JEWISH BLOOD IN HER!

Her face is literally a copy off of a Jewish woman name Esther Rachel Cohen!!! who was born over 100 years ago who came to north America from Odessa, Ukraine, and that same woman is the REAL great grandmother of Seth Rogen! since Seth Rogen's parents are not his real parents and Seth Rogen was pretty much adopted since his legal mother was just a surrogate mother for Seth Rogen's real parents Matthew Cohen and Helen Muskal!

Esther Rachel looked very similar to Kat Dennings but was noticeably more beautiful than her! had a wider and less long face than Kat Dennings, eyes that were more almond shaped and bigger than Kat Dennings eyes! and even had bright blue eyes and dark brown hair like her!!!

Esther Rachel looks more Jewish than Kat Dennings though, she has a VERY eastern European Jewish look to her! and I have seen beautiful reptilian royals who looks like Esther Rachel too greater and also lesser degrees who literally copied their faces off of Esther
Rachel in some cases, and most cases took Esther Rachel's face and combined it with other beautiful faces, since most royals faces are made up of more than one human face!!!!.

Kat Dennings ALSO has two others(or more who knows) girls in her face that are in the face a smaller amount, they are Eva Cohen who is Seth Rogen's sister, and a FEMALE VERSION of Seth Rogen's brother Daniel Cohen!!! LOL, yes both Eva and female version of Daniel are both very beautiful girls, "too bad" Daniel got to be such a gorgeous guy instead! haha.

You can see both Eva and Daniel's eyebrow shape in Kat Dennings face!!! the rest of the face is predominantly Esther Rachel but a longer and narrower face than hers, Eva's and Daniel's! and you can see some of Daniel's nose shape to Kat Dennings nose in some pictures! when Kat Denning's has an INDENTED NOSE SHAPE!

Esther Rachel was taller than Kat Dennings, like around 5'8, Kat Dennings is like 5'3-5'4.

If you ever, EVER see an actually good looking Jewish person who is a reptilian, IT MEANS THEY HAVE SECRET NON JEWISH REPTILIAN ANCESTORS, since "Jewish" reptilians that have no recent non Jewish ancestors are as ugly as fuck!

Like Adam Sandler!

They have secret non Jewish reptilian ancestors because reptilians are whores who cheat on their spouses quite a bit!

Enabler #racist moonbattery.com

Why don’t we just embrace being Racist? Obviously, White Christian Men went to the moon, built the automobile, engineered 5 lane highways, built Hospitals, and made “the Bomb” that stopped WW2 and we beat the Nazis. Who the Hell else has done anything in Modern History besides White Men?! Everyone else has made progress in “peanut butter” and “social justice” which doesn’t progress our country at all. I know this sounds absurd, but honestly, I don’t feel guily of being white, I’m proud. If that makes me a racist, then so be it. I’m a proud, White, Racist.

And another thing, if we didn’t take this land from the “Native Americans,” we would have none of the luxuries we have now. “Native Americans” weren’t here first, they just lived in North America. Then the White Man came with an idea, and built the United States. I can’t stand this garbage.

SchrodingersDick #sexist incels.co

The collapse of civilization is happening in your lifetime. Feminism caused it. There is no coming back from this. Long post.

Expanded upon another post of mine in another thread.. been meaning to post this for you all. I kinda suck at writing so it might be all over the place. There’s a TL;DR down below but I put a lot of effort into this so I’d appreciate if you took the time to read.

For the cucktears lurkers, before you shit on this, Take a step back and look at the world in the context of just another sexually dimorphic mammal species to understand the following.

Civilization is inherently a patriarchy. They are the same thing. One cannot exist without the other. In order for a civlization to exist, female sexual nature (hypergamous genetics-based mate selection) must be kept in check, for men to be treated equally and fairly, to allow for all members to have hope that if they contribute, they can be rewarded with guanrateed breeding right over a female of their choosing. In this sense, it is necessary for the success of a civilization that women be sexually oppressed.. this developed world is a man’s thing and will only ever cater to men. It is our creation for the benefit of all, but mostly genetically subpar, men. It’s all built at the expense of women’s vaginas. Any society in which women have free mate selection can not function. In tribal times, there was 1 sexually successful man for every 17 sexually successful women.. assuming a 100% female sexual success rate, that leaves 94% of men sexless. This is important. If it weren’t for this fact, we wouldn’t have a problem and this site wouldn’t exist. We need to replace genetic currency with something else in order to appease all men and make it possible for everyone to contribute and build something great.. Money was invented. Money must represent survival in order to be worth anything. It must replace the baseline definition of survival meaning a big strong male able to kill other males in a fight. Well we have a police force for that now so no need to worry. But most importantly, it must be able to be used as leverage to purchase pussy under the guise of survival. That’s the only way to keep the male population happy. Without it, women have to reason to mate with subpar men.. This system is inherently oppressive to women. Unfortunately for them, this system favors survival over reproductive success. Everyone survives and procreates but at the expense of females carrying and birthing inferior DNA. Survival is not enough for them. The idea of 1:1 male to female mate pairings guarantees that all the females not paired with a high SMV male with be with a low SMV male and produce genetically poor kids (which is why they are repulsed by low SMV men, which is why rape only exists with low SMV men, but you knew this already, no need to expand), something that disgusts them on a primitive level. It’s a system they need to get rid of.. hence the sexual liberation, fighting for rights, fighting for a right to work, etc. no matter how hard men try to keep a society strong and prosperous, women will actively try and tear it all down.

This snowball formed when women were given rights.. it started a snowball effect. Now there are several things that compounded with each other make for a nightmare scenario for the world.

1: women in the work place. Women earn their own money now. A Man’s resources cannot be used as leverage to purchase reproductive rights with a female. Thus his contributions to the tribe are meaningless as his reward holds no value.

2: genetic misrepresentation and contraception. Estrogen frauding Makeup, plastic surgeries, gym to build a high estrogen ass.. all these things are being used to falsely elevate women’s sexual dimorphism, perceived serum estrogen concentration, age, fertility, etc. notice how every foid does makeup the same way. Thin narrow nose bridge, shadows under the zygos to show zygo projection, rounded chin makeup, eyeliner to fraud thick eyelashes (health indicator).. women are walking around looking like top tier specimens the likes of which would make your caveman ancestors balls explode. Tbh they should bow down to partiarchy that they’re able to walk around like this alone and not immediately be gangraped when they step out of the house looking like they sweat pure estrogen and fertility. And lastly contraception.. things like birth control, condoms and abortion make casual sex and being a whore consequence-free. It’s the reason the cock carousel exists.

3: easy access to a global sexual market. The tribe is no longer a handful of guys and girls with the top guy doing all the fucking. Smartphones, Tinder, Instagram, cars, planes, buses, etc all help make the sexual marketplace a global thing.. in essence it’s an 8 billion member tribe, with easy access to all types of chad dick. Far more competition among males and a far lower sexual success rate among the male population.

4: destruction of religion. Religion isn’t really a thing anymore. It was once a powerful tool to convince women that 1:1 mate pairings are what’s to be expected, no sex before marriage, shit like that (had other reasons too. Keeps men’s testosterone at bay, thou shall not kill, steal, etc. keeps things civil) .. They had a reason to abide and ignore their primal instincts. It did a pretty good job.. now that’s gone, and there’s virtually no way of enforcing monogamy and chastity. Which funny enough, is also the only prerequisite for a woman to get married.. just be a virgin. They can’t even manage that yet a bunch of captain save a hoes are quick to wife em up, and these hoes will wear white on their wedding day symbolizing their purity.. jfl

Compound these 4 new phenomenon together, and you can quickly see that the sexual market is fucked, and a society with a SMP like this cannot sustain itself.. This is a world that belongs to women now. This world automatically excludes all men unfit for reproduction. In this case, it’s likely over 99% of men. What will these men do once they realize money doesn’t buy pussy? Once they realize that if there’s truly no hope for them, they can rely on government assistance, or work a menial bottom tier job just to make enough to survive. If these men even have the drive to go to work, they will have no drive to innovate, get promotions, invent something, become millionaires, etc. you’ll have a lot of complacent men with no motivation to contribute anything. Best hope automation can replace the entire workforce, and if not, then you got a work force made up of 99% women and just lmao if you think that’s gonna take us anywhere. Women have no incentive to make money other than to rid men of their only leverage and open up their prospective mating options. Same deal with them.. they’ll just aim to make the minimum amount to survive and genefraud enough to land 6’4” chad.

This results is a catalysmic shift of the world as we know it.. there will be a total collapse once the number of men who drop out of society reaches critical mass. But until then, you will see a shitload of people dependent on government assistance, the rich being taxed out the ass, who now have even less incentive to keep perusing high paying careers, more people coping with drugs/alcohol, a spike in suicides and mass shootings, high SMV men forming harems, etc.. basically 2018 x10.

For this to happen, It’s not even necessary for the masses to swallow the blackpill.. it’s only necessary for them to realize money doesn’t mean anything anymore. That’s all it takes. Put simply, one’s contributions to society are no longer worth the effort. It’s basically slave labor at that point.

So there you have it. All the causes are there and cannot be reversed.. things have already been set in motion. just wait till the effects of them become painfully obvious. This cannot be fixed since nobody is gonna accept that women’s vaginas are the reason for this. Maybe next time around men don’t fuck up and start the civilization off strong with commoditized pussy. This will all go down in documented history so a mistake like this likely won’t repeat itself. That’s the good news.

This should be lifefuel for you all. You are witnessing the collapse of the most successful civilization on earth in YOUR lifetime. Pretty cool. So ditch your ER plans, untie your ropes, and Sit back and watch the world burn.

TL;DR; a couple rights here and there and a few apps destroyed the world. Patriarchy, religion, and commoditization and sexual oppression of women are paramount to the existence and survival of any civilization. We lack all 4. It’s over. Bunker up and stockpile food and ammo. We’re going back to the jungle.

Dennis Lopez #fundie dennislopez.com

I recently watched a video posted by a YouTuber by the username of “Truth96130,” that is basically telling people Hell is not real and that it is a lie of the Devil that works for his benefit. Yes, seriously, Truth96130 really believes this. In the video a renowned and once respected Pastor by the name of “Carlton Pearson” claimed that God told him Hell is not real. I watched the entire video and gave it the complete chance to convince me that his claim was true. What it did convince me of is what the Bible had already warned me about, thanks to Jesus. I will demonstrate to you, the reader, with Bible verses that you can go look up yourself (not my philosophy), and the words of Jesus himself, how this claim is a full-fledged doctrine of demons.
“Now the Holy Spirit tells us clearly that in the last times some will turn away from the true faith; they will follow deceptive spirits and teachings that come from demons.” (NLT, 1 Timothy 4:1)

This verse by itself should be sufficient evidence for anyone to see that the “Hell doesn’t exist claim” is a trick of the devil to deceive those who are not strong with the Holy Spirit. The Bible warns us of false doctrines, false Prophets, and false Messiah’s. Did Pastor Carlton test the spirits? Did he pray on it and ask God, Jesus, or the Holy Spirit for confirmation? I don’t think so, and neither did Truth96130. The devil is known for offering people things (sinful things) for instant gratification and happiness. God on the other hand is always patient and long-suffering, doing things at the right place and time. There is usually a lesson learned through a journey before you receive something from the Lord.
“Dear friends, do not believe everyone who claims to speak by the Spirit. You must test them to see if the spirit they have comes from God. For there are many false prophets in the world.” (NLT, 1 John 4:1)

Then you have Jesus telling you himself about hell, are the words of Jesus not sufficient? Truth96130 gave no credit to what Jesus said, and said that Jesus spoke in parables which are not historical events. So only the historical things that Jesus spoke about have value and not parables? Are you kidding me? Jesus was teaching lessons about Heaven and Hell, why would it need to be something that happened? Besides, hypothetically it was happening, people were going to Heaven and Hell after death.
It’s these type of people who cherry pick and choose what is convenient to fit their lifestyles, so that they can continue to do what they know is sinful and not feel convicted of it. They are only tricking themselves, but the worst part is they are trying to take others with them! (See Figure 1)
“So ignore them. They are blind guides leading the blind, and if one blind person guides another, they will both fall into a ditch.” (NLT, Matthew 15:14)

I refuse to let that happen, God ordered us to be the salt & light of the world.
“You are the salt of the earth. But what good is salt if it has lost its flavor? Can you make it salty again? It will be thrown out and trampled underfoot as worthless. “You are the light of the world—like a city on a hilltop that cannot be hidden. No one lights a lamp and then puts it under a basket. Instead, a lamp is placed on a stand, where it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your good deeds shine out for all to see, so that everyone will praise your heavenly Father.” (NLT, Matthew 5:13-16)

Here is another lesson about Heaven and Hell from Jesus Christ our Lord and savior.
“Jesus also told them other parables. He said, “The Kingdom of Heaven can be illustrated by the story of a king who prepared a great wedding feast for his son. When the banquet was ready, he sent his servants to notify those who were invited. But they all refused to come! “So he sent other servants to tell them, ‘The feast has been prepared. The bulls and fattened cattle have been killed, and everything is ready. Come to the banquet!’ But the guests he had invited ignored them and went their own way, one to his farm, another to his business. Others seized his messengers and insulted them and killed them. “The king was furious, and he sent out his army to destroy the murderers and burn their town. And he said to his servants, ‘the wedding feast is ready, and the guests I invited aren’t worthy of the honor. Now go out to the street corners and invite everyone you see.’ So the servants brought in everyone they could find, good and bad alike, and the banquet hall was filled with guests. “But when the king came in to meet the guests, he noticed a man who wasn’t wearing the proper clothes for a wedding. ‘Friend,’ he asked, ‘how is it that you are here without wedding clothes?’ But the man had no reply. Then the king said to his aides, ‘Bind his hands and feet and throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’ “For many are called, but few are chosen.” (NLT, Matthew 22:1-14)

Straight from the mouth of Jesus! This teaching illustrates how God sends his messengers and prophets to invite us to be saved, and to accept his Son, Jesus. We are constantly being invited to Heaven. The Bible is always referring to us (The Church) as the body of Christ and the bride of Christ, which is why this parable is about a wedding banquet for the King’s Son. The King being (God), the Son being (Jesus), the servants being (The Angels, Prophets, and Messengers), and the banquet representing (Heaven). I will let you guess who the invitees are.
Pay attention to the keywords, the servants were sent to notify “those who were invited.” This means not everyone is invited, so where do the uninvited go? I’m pretty sure they go to Hell. Let’s not forget “For many are called, but few are chosen,” that pretty much proves that some are chosen and some are not; meaning, some will go to Heaven and some will not.
Let’s continue on, the initially invited (The Israelites) rejected Jesus as the Messiah, some (The Pharisees) went as far as to kill him. From the beginning of the Bible all the way up to revelations, everyone that God has sent to warn humanity (His Prophets & Messengers) has been murdered or rejected all the way up to Jesus Christ and beyond. That covers the portion of parable talking about the invitees rejecting the invitation and some going as far as to murder the servants. Well, what about the King sending an army to destroy and burn their town?
I am glad you asked, throughout the Bible God turns his back on his people (The Israelites) when they reject him and rebel against him by doing such things as worshiping idols, breaking the commandments, and basically breaking their covenant with him. God removes his protection from them and even goes as far as to send other nations to attack them, as he did with King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. (The destruction and burning of the town also represents the end times in revelations). Of course, he was merciful and gave his people ample time to turn away from their sins and repent.
Moving on, the king sending his servants to invite everyone good and bad represents how the sacrificial death of Jesus enables everyone to be able to go to Heaven, without having to perfectly follow the Law of Moses. God knew we wouldn’t be able to do it. The Law of Moses was nothing more than just a long-term lesson to show us that even when facing the penalty of death and similar penalties, we would still break the law. He basically showed us that Humanity cannot govern itself without the help of God. We would need more than Laws, we would need a change of heart, and we would need the Holy Spirit.
Finally, the man not properly dressed illustrates how those that accept Jesus Christ (The Invitation), but continue to live in constant Sin, can lose their salvation. Just because you accept Christ does not mean you are guaranteed to go to Heaven, it’s only the start of your salvation. The Bible doesn’t say to run the race and fight the good fight for nothing. Now, Outer darkness, weeping, gnashing of the teeth, does that sound like Heaven to you? I think Jesus was speaking in a gentle fashion instead of being blunt and giving it to us straight; however, there is scripture which is not so nice, and for a good reason.
“And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous will go into eternal life.” (NLT, Matthew 25:46)

Eternal means nonstop, no breaks, forever, everlasting. Some people try to claim it’s just the second death, meaning you don’t get eternal life, but clearly the scriptures say different. You get eternal life, but it’s not the type of eternal life anyone would ever want. This is why God designed this life to be experienced in time. Things in time begin and end. This teaches us what eternity is. That is how just and fair God is.
“They will be punished with eternal destruction, forever separated from the Lord and from his glorious power.” (NLT, 2 Thessalonians 1:9)

If there is no Hell, how can sinners be punished in eternal destruction or separated from the Lord? Where will they go if they can’t go into Heaven?
“Throwing the wicked into the fiery furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” (NLT, Matthew 13:50)

“If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It’s better to enter eternal life with only one hand than to go into the unquenchable fires of hell with two hands.” (NLT, Mark 9:43)

“But there were also false prophets in Israel, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will cleverly teach destructive heresies and even deny the Master who bought them. In this way, they will bring sudden destruction on themselves. Many will follow their evil teaching and shameful immorality. And because of these teachers, the way of truth will be slandered. In their greed they will make up clever lies to get hold of your money. But God condemned them long ago, and their destruction will not be delayed. For God did not spare even the angels who sinned. He threw them into hell, in gloomy pits of darkness, where they are being held until the Day of Judgment.” (NLT, 2 Peter 2:1-4)

That last verse is just blatantly clear that we will all pay for our sins, and that Hell exist, period! It is true that you can pay for your sins on Earth, but only to a certain extent. God knows that we will not be ultimately perfect without sin,
“Not a single person on earth is always good and never sins.” (NLT, Ecclesiastes 7:20)

“As the Scriptures say, “No one is righteous–not even one.” (NLT, Romans 3:10)

But this does not give you the green light to do whatever you want to. God’s mercy, grace, and forgiveness are determined and given accordingly. God knows when you are trying not to sin, compared to when you really don’t care and are trying to fall through the cracks. We should strive to have as little sin as possible, remember God knows what is in our hearts. He can see if your desire is not to sin, but you fall to it not by deliberate will, but by the evil we all inherited from Adam & Eve, there is a difference.

The devil knows this, which is why he uses clever lies to deceive people. Of course he will tell us that our sins are forgiven through Christ, so it doesn’t matter what we do once we accept Jesus, and OH’ yeah by the way, Hell doesn’t exist. That is not what the true Word of God tells us. The “There is no Hell” claim is a doctrine of demons, there is no doubt about it. If Hell isn’t real then why did Jesus go down to Hell for three days to console the spirits that were imprisoned there?

“Christ suffered for our sins once for all time. He never sinned, but he died for sinners to bring you safely home to God. He suffered physical death, but he was raised to life in the Spirit. So he went and preached to the spirits in prison, those who disobeyed God long ago when God waited patiently while Noah was building his boat. Only eight people were saved from drowning in that terrible flood.” (NLT, 1 Peter 3:18-20)

Truth96130 claimed that I am confusing the time of this verse. The verse above clearly states that Jesus went to preach to the spirits in prison (Hell) that disobeyed God during the time of Noah, basically all the people who died in the great flood; which by the way, is historically recorded in every culture around the world. If there is no Hell and I am confusing this verse, which I am obviously not, then why didn’t these same spirits go directly to Heaven? Why does the Bible say they are in prison? Why doesn’t the Bible simply say, “Jesus swung by the Prison (Hell) to bail these Spirits out?” Now let’s say there is no Hell, why are these Spirits in prison? What is this prison?
If you go back to (NLT, 2 Peter 2:1-4) which I mentioned earlier, you will see “For God did not spare even the angels who sinned. He threw them into hell, in gloomy pits of darkness, where they are being held until the Day of Judgment.” Key sentence “where they are being held,” doesn’t that coincide perfectly with the spirits in prison! You know, prison, jail, being held captive, I don’t know about you, but it sure makes sense to me. This is the perfect example of scripture backing up scripture. As the saying goes “the writing is on the wall,” and let’s not forget about the parable of Lazarus and the rich man. (See Figure 2)
And his soul went to the place of the dead. There, in torment, he saw Abraham in the far distance with Lazarus at his side. (NLT, Luke 16:23)

When I mentioned this to Truth96130 his response was, “well that’s just a parable, and it’s not a historical event.” That statement does not in no way, shape, or form prove that Hell is not real, in fact it diverts from the fact that Jesus used a parable to teach a lesson about Hell. Keyword, “lesson,” Let’s look at the definition of the word parable.

Parable –
A short allegorical story designed to illustrate or teach some truth, religious principle, or moral lesson.
A statement or comment that conveys a meaning indirectly by the use of comparison, analogy, or the like.
Well there you go, a parable is designed to teach a lesson of truth. Just because it’s not a historical event does not mean it is not true. I recommend reading the entire chapter of Luke 16. All words out of the mouth of Jesus, let me remind you. Over and over again in the Bible Hell is spoken about, illustrated, and re-cautioned to those that would believe, keyword believe. The Devil would love for people to not believe in Hell, that way people would just live how they feel and do what they want without having to worry about the repercussions.
Finally, Pastor Carlton and Truth96130 argue that God is love and he wouldn’t do these things to us. I mean how could an all loving merciful God send his people to eternal torture, right? Well once again, directly from Bible verses and not my philosophy, I will show you how God is justified in everything he does. He is the genuine holder of truth, he sets the standards, and he uses fair scales, weights, and balances. We would like to believe we know more than God, we would like to believe our ways are just, we would like to believe we can replace his laws with our own, but the truth is God is the Creator and we are the created. God set the laws of the universe, not us. Who are we but mere mortals.
“For just as the heavens are higher than the earth, so my ways are higher than your ways and my thoughts higher than your thoughts.” (NLT, Isaiah 55:9)

Do we really expect to have the same mental capacity as the entity that created us and the Universe? Seriously? If that were the case then why would we even need God at all? We would be just like him, which is the exact claim the devil made before he was found with sin and casted out of Heaven. The devil claimed he would be like the most high.
“I will climb to the highest heavens and be like the Most High.” (NLT, Isaiah 14:14)

The created cannot expect to comprehend and know as the creator.
“How foolish can you be? He is the Potter, and he is certainly greater than you, the clay! Should the created thing say of the one who made it, “He didn’t make me”? Does a jar ever say, “The potter who made me is stupid”?” (NLT, Isaiah 29:16)

Furthermore, as I tried to understand why God would send people to Hell for not meeting his qualifications, I learned some important truths. God has a standard, the one and only true balance of justice, and he will not break it for anyone. He will not be a hypocrite and break his word. Anyone who breaks the law is subject to the consequences, even the Angels.
Example of Truth: Anyone that is truly honest with pure integrity would understand that it is justified for their child to go to prison for murdering someone. Only hypocrites and people without standards would argue different.

People that go to Hell choose to go to Hell. People that go to Heaven choose to go to Heaven. (See Figure 3) God did not make us robots, he gave us self-awareness. I ask the reader, what has more value? A living being that was programmed to be righteous, or one that wasn’t but chose to be and now is? (Causality) There is a reason for everything, which is not just a “saying.” You might not agree with the reason, but who are we to tell God what is and is not fair. I am 100% sure if Jesus Christ disobeyed God, God would have sent him to Hell too.

Another misconception is that it doesn’t bother God to send people to Hell. That is a lie of the devil. The same way it hurts parents to discipline their children with the rod, it devastates our Father to sentence us (his children) to Hell. God does not enjoy this which is why he sacrificed his only Son.
“For God loved the world so much that he gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life.” (NLT, John 3:16)

“The Lord isn’t really being slow about his promise, as some people think. No, he is being patient for your sake. He does not want anyone to be destroyed, but wants everyone to repent.” (NLT, 2 Peter 3:9)

There is no excuse, we are warned and given a lifetime to get it right.
Then comes the question? We’ll if God is all loving and merciful then why does he let such suffering happen on Earth? That one is easy. There is suffering on Earth because we have free will to do what we want to, and some of us want to continue to do evil things. Some of us want to follow the devil instead of God. Some of us love sin more than we love our creator.
“And the judgment is based on this fact: God’s light came into the world, but people loved the darkness more than the light, for their actions were evil.” (NLT, John 3:19)

People judge God and they never even get to know him. We’ll what about the good people who have bad things happen to them? Why doesn’t God protect them? First of all, what good people? We are all born evil.
“For I was born a sinner–yes, from the moment my mother conceived me.” (NLT, Psalm 51:5)

We inherited evil from Adam & Eve. We have to be taught to be good. We have the knowledge of good and evil, but without the help of God we will always favor evil. We are self-serving and self-gratifying.
“For they loved human praise more than the praise of God.” (NLT, John 12:43)

Also, remember we are not just facing people with free will that choose to be evil. We are facing our adversary the devil, and we are also facing spiritual battles in the unseen world around us.
“We know that we are children of God and that the world around us is under the control of the evil one.” (NLT, 1 John 5:19)

“Stay alert! Watch out for your great enemy, the devil. He prowls around like a roaring lion, looking for someone to devour.” (NLT 1 Peter 5:8)

“For we are not fighting against flesh-and-blood enemies, but against evil rulers and authorities of the unseen world, against mighty powers in this dark world, and against evil spirits in the heavenly places.” (NLT, Ephesians 6:12)

And that my brother’s and sister’s is why there is pain and suffering in the world. Jesus made it very clear that we will suffer in this world, so why not suffer for him instead? Why not suffer to make it to the pearly gates?
“And all nations will hate you because you are my followers. But everyone who endures to the end will be saved.” (NLT, Matthew 10:22)

“Students are not greater than their teacher, and slaves are not greater than their master. Students are to be like their teacher, and slaves are to be like their master. And since I, the master of the household, have been called the prince of demons, the members of my household will be called by even worse names! (NLT, Matthew 10:24-25)

“Yes, and everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution.” (NLT, 2 Timothy 3:12)

Jesus did not promise life without problems once you start following him. He tells no lies and gives it to us straight. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is not about infinite happiness in this life, but it is about trials and tribulations leading to infinite happiness in the afterlife. Jesus never said we had to be perfect, nor does the Bible. The Bible tells us to turn away from Evil, stride to change; and most importantly, to ask God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit to help us do it. We are incapable of doing it on our own. So make no mistake of misunderstanding that only perfect people make it to Heaven, which is another lie of the devil. Name one person in the Bible, besides Jesus, that didn’t sin. You can’t do it. Do not try to earn your salvation, instead embrace it. Salvation is a gift from God, it is meant to be received and maintained.
“Salvation is not a reward for the good things we have done, so none of us can boast about it.” (NLT, Ephesians 2:9)

Believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who sacrificed himself on the cross so that we can be forgiven for our sins, become reborn and move forward from there, and know that hell is a real place. Fear the Lord of Heaven’s armies and respect who he is.
“Fear of the LORD is the foundation of true knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and discipline.” (NLT, Proverbs 1:7)

“Fear of the LORD is the foundation of wisdom. Knowledge of the Holy One results in good judgment.” (NLT, Proverbs 9:10)

God can take our mistakes and help us correct them, he can help anyone, anywhere, anytime get back on the course he designed for them. It is never too late to turn to God through Jesus Christ. Simply lift your hands up to God and repeat “Jesus I repent of my sins and I accept you as my Lord and savior, Amen.” Then seek the kingdom first, read the Bible, continue to pray, and always talk to Jesus looking for guidance and answers, and remember we have the Holy Spirit to help us through it all.

“But when the Father sends the Advocate as my representative–that is, the Holy Spirit–he will teach you everything and will remind you of everything I have told you.” (NLT, John 14:26)

“Seek the Kingdom of God above all else, and live righteously, and he will give you everything you need.” (NLT, Matthew 6:33)

I encourage all my readers to fact check me, go look for yourself and make sure that I am not misleading you. Make sure that I am speaking from the lessons of the word of God and not from my own philosophy. Make sure that I am not twisting the word of God. I also invite my readers to comment and share your opinions down below in the comment section. May the Lord of Heaven’s Armies Bless you all!

I am currently reading and quoting from the New Living Translation version of the Bible.

Brother Nathanael Kapner #fundie realjewnews.com

Being Jewish can mean many things.

For some it's the way they look. For others it's the way they act. For some it's the way they talk. For others it's the way they sulk.

[...]

Keep on 'feeling Jewish' but you better accept the one thing being Jewish is:

Rejecting Jesus Christ as the Messiah.

[...]

That's why they crucified Christ.

[...]

Keeping Jews "Jewish" means rejecting Jesus Christ.

A religion based on a disclaimer is a 'gutter religion.' But the Orthodox Church, is heaven-bound.

How about opposite views? Can they both be Jewish?

There's the Republican Jewish Coalition and there's the National Jewish Democratic Council. Both 'Jewish.'

Different platforms, same ringleaders.

That's why Hillary, Cruz, Jeb, and even little Rand crave the Jewish vote.

Jews patrol their identity-(and politicians)-like cops on a beat.

Is it really all that important to be Jewish?

If it's true that Christ will come in "flaming fire" to wreak vengeance on those who "obey not the Gospel," the answer is no.

I'm so glad I left being Jewish. Don't you wish every Jew did?

Sven Longshanks #racist dailystormer.name

Back when Christianity was first becoming known in Britain, there was no conflict between it and the so called paganism that had gone before. The people at the top of British society, the Arch Druids, became the Arch Bishops of the Celtic Church. Christianity was looked upon as the natural evolution of the British people’s spiritual doctrines. The idea that Christians would be opposed to Druids because the Druids were ‘Pagan’ was not something that was even countenanced. The Druids and the Christians were the same people, obeying the same laws and part of the same society. If Christianity had meant one half of society being against the other half, it would never have been accepted in the first place. As it was, it was decided to change from being a ‘Pagan’ nation to a Christian one in the second century in Britain and the idea for that came from the King and his Druid advisors and was warmly welcomed by the people. This would not have happened if it had not been seen as a positive development.

People that wish to denigrate Christianity or attack it as being foreign really have no faith at all in their own abilities as White people, or even in their own ancestors. White people pick up lots of things from around the world and if they are useful, then they get appropriated and adapted to White people’s tastes and needs. There is no way that our ancestors would have accepted a foreign religion and no way that after being a White religion for 1500 years, it would not exclusively show the spirit of the White man within it. I say 1500 years as it was after that time that the Jews started to have an influence on it from within, culminating in the hideous monstrosity that goes by the label of Judao-Christianity today.

National Socialism saw that Jewish influence, recognised it for what it was and sought to fight back by promoting what they called Positive Christianity. This meant accentuating the parts of Christianity that were most relevant to the struggles that the nation were involved in at the time. That meant concentrating on the Jews being the children of the Devil and the Antichrist and the Aryan qualities of Jesus, who Adolf Hitler spoke about, as a role model for Aryans, as he knew full well that Jesus was not a Jew. He spoke about the way that Jesus heroically threw the Jewish usurers out of the temple, highlighting the courage of this act and the way that the Jews reacted to it.

Today it would also mean concentrating on the Biblical laws against race-mixing and sodomy, both of which were nowhere near as prevalent in the early 20th century as they are in the 21st. Today’s Churches try to pretend those laws do not exist or that they meant something else, in the same way as they have twisted the love for your neighbour law. It goes without saying that love for your neighbour and being prepared to die for those you love had always been interpreted to mean love for your nation and being prepared to die defending it, up until the modern church twisted it to mean love for the Antichrist and his army of barbarians.

All the best of our earlier beliefs were incorporated into Christianity, giving rise to much of our Christian customs and iconography, as well as our festivals. The ancient gods began life as our ancestors and we never stopped honoring them until today. Christianity commands us to honour our ancestors and it helped keep them alive for us by recording their exploits so that they could be passed down to later generations. Christian monks would painstakingly copy out the classics of our past, documenting our previous beliefs so that we might remember the early years of our race. They educated the people so that they might understand our history and contribute to the continuing story themselves.

Attacking Christianity does not help our cause. It shows a lack of knowledge about our first millennium history as recorded by our own people and shows a great disrespect to our ancestors who lived and died for it. It inspired them to create the most amazing works of art and architecture, some of the finest high culture that the world has ever seen. Its laws formed the basis for our societies and enabled them to become stable enough for us to form world conquering empires. Now we have rejected it our people lack the faith to wish to die defending their homeland. They lack the love for their own people that should have prevented the Muslims from ever setting foot on our shores. They lack the moral fibre to stand up against the promotion of homosexuality and promiscuity. Without it our nations have become weak and easy prey for the Jews and the hordes of untermenschen that they have invited in.

The whole Pagan against Christian mind-set is a distraction from what really matters and is like arguing over who was better, you as a child or you as an adult. There is much that is inspiring about the Pagan myths and that is because they are ours, the same as Christianity is ours. Just like Christianity is being warped and universalised, our Pagan myths are too, with the gods being turned into gay transvestite comic book characters and Jesus being turned into a Negro. This is unacceptable, both are a part of our history, both belong to us and came from us and both need defending from the dogs and the swine seeking to trample them. To join them in attacking our heritage like that is to go against everything that made us what we are today.

Instead of attacking Christianity, we should be promoting the parts of it that are most needed in our struggle, just as the National Socialists did. To do anything else means accepting defeat and handing our inheritance over to the enemy.

High Priest Mageson 666 #racist josministries.prophpbb.com

I know the favourite pastime of Christian moralists is to rail about Gay People, Escorts, Porno, people having sex outside of marriage, anyone whoever masturbated ever in the history of the universe and such. But lets be honest and hold the bible gropers to the standard of their own Bible which they never read anyway but like to pretend they did or something. Since they like to create their own standard of acceptable sex to make them pure to then condemn everyone from.

In Christianity all sex is deviant thus immoral and sinful. Sex is the original sin that causes the fall of man, this is mentioned in the old testament and was the original gospel of the church. The point of the gospel was Jesus is the only sinless man because he was born of a virgin, without sex involved. We are born in sin because our parents had sex to create us. Jesus the perfect Christian is a celibate, sex hating, woman hating Jewish man. Who tells everyone normal sexual desires are the worst sin and will send them all to hell. For a man to even fell desire for a women is sin in Christianity as stated by Jesus. Jesus tells everyone to be a eunuch for the Kingdom of Heaven. A eunuch is man who is castrated and thus can't ever have sex or masturbate. This is Jesus the perfected Christian all Christians are supposed to be......CHRIST LIKE. Christian Monks would literally castrate themselves in the most devout cases. The church carried on the practice of castrating boys for centuries up till the 19th century. Many times so they would sing in their church choirs without needing any icky, Eve like, whores around. You know those people called Women and stuff.

The church mandated enforced celibacy on the European population among married couples as well for insane amounts of time. When a women gave birth the church priests would count back the months to her conception to see if it was during the periods of enforced celibacy and woe to the couple if it was. Lowering the White birth rates as much as possible. Which is what the Jews are still doing today.

Don't give me that family values talk either. Jesus the Perfect Christian hated the family unit and demanded a person has to HATE their Father and Mother, siblings in order to love him. And that he had come to turn family members against either other, thus destroying the Family unit. The European White family unit as well. This is what the Jews are still doing today.

Masturbation is also a sin the sin of Onnanism you just cant win in Christianity. Don't have sex with anyone else ever, don't masturbate, don't even think about anything sexual even the thought is a sin the same as having sex as Jesus stated.

Its the ultimate form of Jewish guilt pedaling, take something natural and psychopathologize it into something evil and then offer the solution of control by Jewish narrative. That's the same old jewish tactic even today with sexism and racism. Their attempts to turn racial altruism and normal sex roles into sinfulness. And pedal guilt and offer their solution that of Jewish communism and White genocide. The Jews took their original sin hokum and are now pedaling it as The Original Sin Of Being Born With White Skin. To which all White People must repent and embrace the Jewish salvation of enforced race mixing, open boarders in the name of White Guilt......Why? Because Jews that's why. That's always been why.

This anti-White narrative is nothing new. Its all Christianity has ever been from the start. Telling Europeans all their Pagan ancestors are burning in the Hell of a Jewish god for being Racist [following the Race Religion of the Aryans] and they must repent of being White and their natural White identity, embrace a Jewish man from ancient Judea as their Master and god. And become part of an alien, anti-White cultural identity of the Jewish promoted, universal, radical egalitarian, multi-racial brotherhood of man. What's really changed in all these centuries same Jewish game different names.

bchris02 #fundie city-data.com

Its not about pride, its about not spitting in the face of God in a time when we need His blessings more than ever. In the 1960s, seperate but equal was anything but equal. Today, however, civil unions and marriage can be made completely equal while keeping God out of it.

Forget 2008. Lets go back to 1958, when we as a nation had morals, decency, and the highest respect for the nuclear family and we were still one nation under God. And remember those times - things were actually going good for America in that era. We must have been doing something right! What people today call "progress" isn't progress at all.

fschmidt #fundie mikraite.org

Modern culture is evil. If you don't agree with this, let me save you some time and suggest that you stop reading here. This post discusses alternatives to modern culture on the assumption that you reject modern culture because it is evil. What are the alternatives to modern culture? Before discussing alternatives that I think can work, I will discuss alternatives that don't work.

Politics doesn't work. Moral people are an insignificant minority in all nations today. And never in history has a nation been made moral through politics. Politics is useful in a society formed by moral people. In such a society, politics can help implement the will of these moral people. This is how America worked before it became evil. But in an evil society, politics is just a contest for power, nothing more.

Modern Christianity doesn't work. Modern Christianity is all faith and no works, which means no morality. The main practical difference between a modern Christian and an atheist is that the modern Christian violates the third commandment while the atheist doesn't, making the atheist slightly less sinful than the modern Christian. I discussed in detail what went wrong with modern Christianity in The Rise and Fall of Christian Culture.

Modern Catholicism doesn't work. To a large degree, what went wrong with Protestantism has infected Catholicism. The current Pope is a total disaster. But Catholicism was essentially doomed by the Second Vatican Council which fully gave in to modern culture.

White nationalism doesn't work. No racial movement in history has succeeded without religious backing. White nationalists who want success should copy the most successful racial movement, namely Judaism. This means that white nationalists need to pick a religion for their movement. Until they do so, they are a hopeless bunch.

That completes the important options that don't work. Now let's consider options that work. History shows that all good cultures are supported by a good religion. How can one judge if a religion is good and strong enough to resist modern culture? One superficial way to judge that I have found to be very effective is just to ask whether men and women sit separately during religious service. Religions that have maintained this separation have shown that they are strong enough to resist modern culture

Orthodox Judaism works well if you are a racist jew. I am jewish but not racist, so Judaism doesn't work for me. For non-jewish racists, Orthodox Judaism is a model well worth copying.

Orthodox Christianity may work in some conditions. Mainstream Orthodox Christianity does not work in the West because it is too weak of a religion to withstand modern culture. This can be seen by the fact that the sexes are mixed in service. Historically, Orthodox Christianity has always partnered with a government that supports it, so this seems to be the condition in which it works. Currently, the obvious candidate is Orthodox Christianity in Russia where it has government backing. I haven't been to Russia, so I can't say for sure how well this works, but I think this is an option well worth investigating for Christians.

True Orthodox Christianity is a variant of Orthodox Christianity that looks interesting and may actually work in the West. But it is small and its future is uncertain. Here is a very good set of videos explaining the idea.

Conservative Mennonism is an excellent alternative for Christians. All of traditional Anabaptism is sound, but the conservative Mennonites seem to have found the optimal balance. They don't reject all modern technology as Old Order Anabaptists do (like the Amish), but they still do a good job keeping modern culture out. They are serious Christians, serious about following Jesus's teachings. The book Brethren Thinking written by an unconventional Old Order Anabaptist provides a highly intelligent introduction to Anabaptist thinking. The book An Introduction to Old Order and Conservative Mennonite Groups provides a good overview of the Mennonite variants. I specifically recommend the Mennonite groups classified as "Ultra-Conservatives" on page 162 of this book. You can find a Mennonite church near you using this map. If you have any more questions about Mennonites, you can ask on this Mennonite forum.

Islam is an alternative worth investigating. While Islam has issues today, it has worked well in the past. And it still at least upholds basic moral traditions. I believe that Islam is the religion that is most likely to have a reformation and become the next successful culture. But to judge Islam for yourself, you should visit your local mosque and read the Quran.

Mikraite is the alternative that I have chosen. None of the above options work for me because I am not a jewish racist and not Christian. So I worked with some like-minded people to form a moral religion based on the Old Testament. You can read more in What is a Mikraite?.

David J. Stewart #fundie #sexist jesusisprecious.org

It is a horrible feeling, to be the husband of a lazy wife who is a slacker. Since she has no boss to ensure that she does her duties as a mother and a wife, if she refuses to cooperate to do her job, the husband has no choice but to step in. Effectively, a husband is his wife's only boss. Who else is going to correct her? But what happens when a wife punishes the husband for having to become a boss, because she is irresponsible, and a slacker? What is such a husband to do—when his wife leaves out the door, goes to friends houses to stay, goes to women's shelters and church shelters, back to her mother, and anywhere she can find someone to feel sorry for her—because she is rebellious, lazy and refuses to attend to her children, husband and home? Woe unto that rebellious woman!

“A rebellious wife is never a happy wife.” —Pastor Jack Hyles, a quote from the life-changing sermon series, “WOMAN, THE COMPLETER.”

Jacob's Mother Was to Blame for Ruining the Family

If you think about it, Rebecca ruined her son Jacob! Abraham and Sarah were given a son from God, named Isaac. Abraham sent his servant to find a wife for Isaac, and her name was Sarah. I am partial toward that tradition by the way, of parents picking a wife for their son. Parents are much wiser and know what to look for, and what warning signs to see. I wish to God that my parents had chosen a wife for me when I was a young man, because I chose very poorly. Albeit, I am grateful to God for the opportunity and privilege to be married and have four children. Sadly, my wife quit and divorced me in 2006, and I have lived alone since, often giving her money voluntarily and overcoming her evil with my good (Romans 12:21). She refuses to apologize for anything, still 13 years later in 2019, blaming me and others for her failures in the marriage. That hinders us from reuniting.

I want you to consider dear reader that the thought hadn't entered into Jacob's mind to deceive Jacob his father, nor to betray Esau his brother, until his ungodly mother like the serpent in Eden put that evil thought into Jacob's mind. Read the following disturbing words, in which Rebekah sinfully orders her son to deceive his own father and betray his own brother...

Genesis 27:6, “And Rebekah spake unto Jacob her son, saying, Behold, I heard thy father speak unto Esau thy brother, saying, Bring me venison, and make me savoury meat, that I may eat, and bless thee before the LORD before my death. Now therefore, my son, obey my voice according to that which I command thee. Go now to the flock, and fetch me from thence two good kids of the goats; and I will make them savoury meat for thy father, such as he loveth: And thou shalt bring it to thy father, that he may eat, and that he may bless thee before his death. And Jacob said to Rebekah his mother, Behold, Esau my brother is a hairy man, and I am a smooth man: My father peradventure will feel me, and I shall seem to him as a deceiver; and I shall bring a curse upon me, and not a blessing. And his mother said unto him, Upon me be thy curse, my son: only obey my voice, and go fetch me them.”
Had Jacob been right with God, he never would have obeyed his mother's evil words, because she was telling him to disobey God by sinning against his own father and brother. Shame on Rebekah! What a wicked thing she did. Rebekah said to Jacob, “Upon me be thy curse.” She knew she was bringing a curse upon her own son, Jacob. She didn't care! The ungodly crowd of Jews who wanted Jesus executed said the same thing in Matthew 27:25, “Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.” And so it was in 70 AD when Rome annihilated Jerusalem, leaving no stone unturned and scattering the Jews throughout the world unto this very day nearly 2,000 years later!

As a consequence of her rebellion, Rebekah never saw Jacob again! She was never able to behold her grandchildren, not even one time until her death. Rebekah had to suffer the consequences of dying a bitter old woman, without her grandchildren by her side. Jacob's mother Rebekah did evil in the sight of the Lord. She knowingly and willingly lied, stirring up her son to deceive his father and betray his brother, influencing Jacob to dishonor God, which is what an ungodly woman does! Rebekah conspired and manipulated her own family to get her rebellious way! THIS IS THE HORRIBLE SIN OF REBELLION!

Trifle and Shadow #fundie reddit.com

Progress is a unique feature of Western civilization. With the exception of the introduction of technology, the entirety of the third-world has made no progress and continues in the natural state of man--constant, low-lying ethnic/tribal warfare.

Furthermore, who says we're against technical change? Whenever a leftist brings up "progress" it is almost inevitably in the social sphere, which yes, we do oppose. Currently speaking you have to be detached from reality not to notice that the threats to technical and scientific advancement are from the left who engages in suppressing work that doesn't fit a political narrative and who also peddle postmodernism which kills objective research.

No, diversity sets off warning bells and as I've said in a previous post, raises transaction costs and harms moral and social norms. The moral emotion of purity most likely developed to prevent such a thing from happening--you cannot diversify the heartland of a nation without repercussion.
To flip this, I find it funny that you people never assume that racism reciprocates. Native Americans were brutal to the settlers and currently blacks disproportionately commit crimes on whites, including rape which to my knowledge is not rooted in economic issues.

"The old system often benefits you conservatives, explaining why most of you are white. The old system benefits you mainly in wealth and society. Discrimination still exists because we have not foregone this system that doesn't work in today's society anymore."

Ding ding ding We aren't cucks who are going to go quietly into the night. We want the institutions that we helped build and were built for us to continue to benefit US. The bourgeois sold out the American white middle class and we won't forget it.

"Discrimination still exists because we have not foregone this system that doesn't work in today's society anymore."

Discrimination exists because multi-ethnic democracy and a multicultural society are alien and should be done away with. I'm not discriminatory toward Mongolians because they're on the other side of the Earth.

Why is an ethnic separation so apocalyptic to you? Or are you really using sheep's clothing to dress up the right for the global downtrodden to use our country as a battered women's shelter?

NTS #conspiracy northerntruthseeker.blogspot.ca

It should now be obvious to everyone by now exactly who is behind this rush to war against nuclear armed Russia..

The fact is simple... The criminal and most evil Rothschilds control the entire planet's financial systems and have enslaved much of mankind in the process to criminal odious debt that can never ever be paid off.... For Russia to attempt to break free of that criminality could mean the end to the Rothschild control as other nations quickly follow suit like dominoes... These Jewish banking criminals would do anything by all means necessary to stop this move by Russia, even if it means nuclear war and the devastation of this entire planet in the process!

I do hope that Vladimir Putin also has a very strong kevlar suit to wear because this move will mean Jewish agents being sent to Moscow to have him assassinated (They have failed, luckily, so far)... Again, these monsters do not want ANY of their slave nations to escape their grip, and this move by Putin is very reminiscent of when John Fitzgerald Kennedy passed Executive Order 11110 way back in 1963 in an attempt to free the United States from the grip of Rothschild control and restore the US money supply to the American people... We know what happened as a result on that fateful day in November 1963....

Yes, our criminal governments are also fully under control of their Jewish masters and are in lockstep in the vilification of Russia... They will lead us all into a war that will could mean the end of life itself on this planet all to support their Jewish masters and their insane lust for control of our money...

I am crossing my fingers that Putin succeeds in this effort.... It could be the start of real freedom for our entire planet, or it could signal the end of our world.... Hopefully people everywhere finally wake up and put their support behind the former...

vintologi #sexist #transphobia #quack reddit.com

Why you should transition

Becoming MtF tranny is a way better option than living another 40+ years as male incel.

Step0: watch tsf monogatari
step1: go to a gender clinic so you can get proper diagnosis.
step2: begin having fun with dildo, shove it up your ass.
step3: back up your sperm.
step4: start hormone replacement therapy.
step5: removal of unwanted hair.
step6: facial feminization surgery.
step7: social transition.

The experience of becoming female

Honestly this was even harder to decide to post than my attempt to be gay 8+ months ago. Because the implications and outcomes have been completely different. The experience has been completely different.

Disclaimer: Before all of this I 100% completely identified as a man, a man's man type of internal mindset. Very heterosexual. And gay stuff just did nothing for me. It was only out of desperation and having the right features that I attempted this gender transition. By right features I mean I was only 5'8 starting out and had a 2.7 inches erect penis. Plus all my facial features are feminine and I was pretty cute even as a guy. With 4 inches to my height and dick I could have been a normie or even chad lite. Yet reality is cruel sometimes. Since being on hormones I have lost some height, so I'm closer to 5'7 now, a true manlet if I ever decide to return to manhood.

I have been on estrogen for about 6 months now. It all started when I got my new therapist three months before that. Who referred me to a new general practitioner he knows. Obviously I told him nothing about being incel or hating females. Only that I always felt like a girl, which was a massive lie. I just wanted to get hormones to attempt a gender transition and hopefully become attracted to dudes like the other trans on reddit. Who so ironically betray themselves and their cause by casually posting truth.

I just want to say for the record I don't believe in any of the trans bullshit about being born that way. Maybe an exceptionally small amount of them are. Yet if you read their forums or subs its so extremely common how many of them are just guys who wank to shemale porn and have autogynephilia. The vast majority almost always speak about how their brains get changed by hormones. Further proving they are truly male in the brain. Basically they are mostly cross dressing fetishists. Maybe a very few of them really were born with a fucked up brain but its hard to weed out the liars. Since the fake trans just copy what the real trans say. Yet they let it slip in their posts how much they love tranny porn or wanking their she cocks. Not that it matters, more trans is always a good thing. Less beta orbiters and sometimes even trans that are hot.

The month after that things got even more intense. It was clear to me that females experienced sex with far more joy than men. Its like having a dick with sensory feelings that reaches all through up the body and hooks in the heart. My first experience with a guy was a non chad friend, who knew I had started a transition and thinks I am actually trans. We didn't have sex or even oral but we kissed a few times and cuddled for a few hours. It was magical, the cuddles were even better than the endless orgasms. Waves upon waves of mental emotion mixed with sexual waves of pleasure. Its so extremely addicting.

I'm beyond words enjoying my experience on female hormones. I still hate females, cucks, and chads. This is the turning point for me. If I don't quit now I will probably end up sterile and unable to break this intense addiction to female hormones and to men. Finishing transition will take work but leads to a life of happiness. Not finishing means going back to a hell after experiencing a heavenly paradise the likes of which I could have never imagined.

I feel like any choice I make is life wrecking but I was already totally fucked to begin with. Its so fucked up to crave men, to think of being dominated by them. My brain so fucked up on female hormones its telling me it would feel amazing to swallow semen and get creampied. I only have one cuddle buddy right now but I think about cuddling other guys too.

Things look potentially so good, at least better than when it was hopeless. I don't know if I can ever go through with having my genitals cut off. I just have like a mental block over such a barbaric surgery. I think I could live fine with just having male parts. I partially identify as female but know deep down I'll always be a man because men are awesome.

I could see this as being the best cope for manlets who are cute. As long as their face isn't too masculine. I'm not saying its perfect, it has downsides like having to pee more. Its still a lot better than being incel forever.

Wayne Allyn Root #sexist rightwingwatch.org

On his radio program yesterday, right-wing commentator, conspiracy theorist and Donald Trump–obsessed sycophant Wayne Allyn Root warned men never to date a liberal woman who owns cats because “she’ll cut your pee-pee off.”

Root was ranting about a federal contractor who was arrested for allegedly leaking classified information to a news outlet when he went off on a tangent about how liberal women who own cats are all insane.

“Find me a woman who is a feminist and a liberal and likes cats and I will find you someone who ought to be in an insane asylum every single time,” Root bellowed. “Hey guys, if any of you out there are single and you ever meet a woman who admits to being a liberal and hating Trump and when you get to her house, she’s got cats, run for your life. Run, run, run. Like those ads in Britain, run and hide and tell other men to run and hide.”

“No man can ever live with a liberal woman with cats,” he continued. “She’ll cut your pee-pee off, I promise you. Liberals are mentally unstable and mentally insane. They’re unhinged.”

Jason Lisle, Ph D. #fundie answersingenesis.org

[in a previous paragraph, he mentions how all natural explanations fail]:

Curiously, the magi seem to have been the only ones who saw the star—or at least the only ones who understood its meaning. Israel’s King Herod had to ask the magi when the star had appeared (Matthew 2:7). If the magi
alone saw the star, this further supports the notion that the star of Bethlehem was a supernatural manifestation from God rather than a common star, which would have been visible to all.

[If the magi alone saw the star, maybe it means the story was sodding made up??]

Carey Callahan #fundie archive.is

I had a terrible summer when it comes to my gender dysphoria. It got so intense, right after the Atlantic thing, and then Blood and Visions weirdly made it a lot worse, and all the way through me graduating my dysphoria was killing me. It was SO disheartening, because I’m committed to never doing anything like HRT or cutting my body up, mostly because I’m trying to be in really good shape in my 90’s. But it’s super disheartening when you’re in an episode like that and it feels like it’ll just be your whole life, and the only option is putting up with it or wrecking your pelvic floor.

And then I stopped waitressing. I started working full time as an LPC, suddenly I was going WEEKS without anyone at my workplace making comments about my body. Indeed as an LPC it’s kind of my job, if anyone does make a comment about my body, to make a big deal about boundaries and what boundaries are appropriate in the therapy room. That is the OPPOSITE of being a waitress/a receptionist/ legal assistant/barback/ working at a union. That’s such a huge difference in my working day.

Then at the same time I finally get feedback in my life that’s proof of my own self-efficacy, in that this long terrible grad school process finally produced a degree.

My gender dysphoria has been, for the past month, on vakay. I barely have been thinking about my body, except if I’m hungry or my back hurts or I’m feeling particularly energized and good. But not those obsessive thoughts about “oh my body is shaped so funny” or “everyone’s looking at my body” or “I can’t do anything in this body” or “I’m trapped in this body.” Guys and gyns, me barely thinking about my body is UNREAL. IT’S SO GOOD. IT’S SO FUN TO NOT THINK THAT MUCH ABOUT THE SHAPE OR APPEARANCE OF MY BODY.

What’s even crazier about not thinking that much about my body is that for most of September I was having pretty good naked times, and naked times have historically been prime triggers for my gender dysphoria. (The naked times have come to an end, in the calmest and non-distressing breakup I’ve ever experienced, so even though they’re over I still consider the whole thing a win?)

So we go from a July/August crazy intense GD episode to near-extinction in September. My conclusion is I think my GD is so much about stress and self-efficacy. I get those obsessive thoughts when the world has given me lots of feedback that I’m totally powerless. If I’m getting feedback that I’m capable of having some impact in the outer world, and if I’m not only allowed but strongly encouraged to enforce boundaries, my GD seems to want to take a break.

Now, the patterns to my GD don’t mean much about your GD. I’m just saying what do you know about your GD if you haven’t tracked it? Also what would you rather not know about your GD? Are there aspects to your GD you’d really rather not acknowledge?

Because I get it, I get wanting that surgery and wanting that beard and just wanting to plow through and not wait any longer. But what you don’t want to acknowledge will end up fucking you up. You have to force yourself to be super real about your GD. If your therapist is anything like how mine were, they will not force you to be very real about your GD. If the people in the community you know are anything like the people I knew, they will tell you thinking too hard about your GD is internalized transphobia. So this is on you.

Other people have not signed any kind of agreement with a higher power to give you good advice. Other people are not particularly invested in how your life turns out. You are actually the only person responsible for the advice you listen to and the consequences you have to live out because of the advice you chose to listen to. Believe you me, when shit goes south, all those people who told you to jump in and waste no time will swear they didn’t say it like that.

Track your GD for at LEAST a year. Whatever the consequences of taking T are for you, you will live out those consequences for SO MUCH LONGER than a year. Don’t accept your own bullshit, no matter what social incentives there are for accepting your own bullshit. You will create exceptionally dumb and hard situations to have to navigate. In the end no matter how it all pans out the lesson is the same- we create what we end up experiencing. Yes, in a world that is violent and dumb and unfair and a shitpile. But in this shitpile we still make our own choices, and get a lot of data back about what our choices create. Track that data now so you can think a little clearer about what kind of data you want to get a year from now.

HaShev #fundie usmessageboard.com

Using Blackrooks standard:
Charlie Manson said he was Jesus, well according to Christian reasoning they can't argue against it without arguing against themselves and their own beliefs.
The logic used is merely through silly fallacious claims to Jesus being Messiah based merely on self testimony & saying he fit 300 prophecy, most of which aren't even messianic or properly read and stated. Some are even comically based on NT post dated script instead of OT.

Using this logic if Charles Manson fit 300 characteristics of Jesus without manipulating the characteristics or cheating like people do in emulating Moshiach then Charles Manson has to be Jesus according to Christian standards of reasoning. And since Charles Manson self trstified he was and does fulfill the coming of Jesus in over 300 ways then Jesus came back bringing division & as a murderer as he said he would in Matthew, Thomas, and Peter.
Since Jesus fulfilled over 300 verses on Satan then he must be Satan of the Bible.
Therefore Christianity standards and reasoning suggest Satan was Jesus and he came back as Charles Manson and your arguing this fact would suggest you are admitting Christianity's logic and reasoning on Moshiach is skewed.

Therfore moshiach claims must be forfeited and the standard to decipher MOshiach has to be re-evaluated and rediscovered by fulfillment of legitimate expectations that are Torah based not oral pagan borrowed traditions and self testimony.
Conclusion" Jesus either wasn't messiah like you thought or by your standards he had to be Satan, either way your character becomes the adversary and thief, thus either way he can be concluded as Satan.

FACT: Jesus is depicted like a long haired hippy in sandles.
Charles Manson claimed to be Jesus and was a hippy in sandles, we must take Manson for his word in even standard to Christians taking Jesus self testified word and claims.
Fact: they say Jesus is son of man & Charles is Man/son.
Fact: Jesus family said he was crazy
Manson and his family is crazy.
Jesus was a murderer from the begining who promised to not bring peace but to cause opposite through division describing a world inferno. Manson did the same with his race war he planed division chaos and worlds end in the same manner setting it a blaze.
Fact: Jesus asked his followers to disregard their parents for sake of him being their new family as did Manson.
Jesus lived in a shack so did Manson.
Jesus hated the Romans, Manson hsted Roman Polanski. Jesus took mushrooms as did his followers according to found texts, Manson did as well as his followers.
Cult leaderJesus had his apostles Manson had his cult flock called his family. Jesus lived and roamed the desert, so did Manson.

Using Christian logic & standards
Charlie Manson Was Jesus and Jesus was Lucifer cause all the verses on Lucifer were 100% fulfilled by the first fallen Christ.

To disagree is to admit the standard used to call him Moshiach is flawed making him Lucifer anyway.... this is called Check mate...
because every excuse maneuver you make out of this still means I got your king.
My kNight to your King= Check Mate!
That's why I use that term, so you'd notice your argument backed you in a corner with 0 excuses and maneuvers left.
All you can do is
1)cheat
2)pretend your mom is calling and run away
3) throw the chess board to the ground and have an ad hominem hissy fit like a child.
So far everyone seems to choose option 3.

Chrystalwuzhere #fundie rr-bb.com

Are you saying that there are some places where God does not belong?

If that's the case, the Millenial Kingdom will be a bummer for folks who think so...for Christ will be all-inclusive in EVERYTHING!

Besides, read back through the old rule of the Kings of Israel. Those kings who destroyed the high places and pagan gods and made God's law the state religion were called good kings who did right in the sight of the Lord.

I could care less what this country calls legal. What matters is what God wants.

Anonymous #conspiracy firstlightforum.wordpress.com

Any and all types of currency are totally controlled by Jews …

The only thing a real patriot should be extolling is a constitutional return to currency printed by Congress ..the Federal Reserve loans us the money they make for us at interest … This type of currency whether fiat or excessive abuse by Jews is monumentally destructive to the USA economy, which is now dead from the USA dollar being dumped by nations at a fast rate and is only backed by petro/ euro oil shenanigans … The dollar is dead … The Jews painted us into a corner with the dollar in their control, as they squeezed out profits and power they removed our financial stability …

Kennedy circulated congressional mint U.S. notes that were silver backed … The illusion is that silver or metals have value, and so the paper judenfetzen is so valued “in theory only” … The pathway of U.S. money valuation is a murky untraceable journey to Tel Aviv … Many other “valuation” mediums have been exploited for the sake of credit and to keep the dollar functional … The shitkikes don’t even want their USA welfare billions in dollars any more; and they whined that they wanted it in euros … It makes me realize that I have to study this a lot more, as it is presently relevant in our lives …

Aquiline nosed Caucasian/Khazar Jew Maurice Templesman became the Jewess Jackie Kennedy’s lover and private financier after the Jews killed JFK—Jews marry their women to prominent Gentile politicians to claim their children as their own—children of a Jewish mother are Jews forever according to the Jews’ sacred literature

When the shitkikes deluded the Congress to sign a 100 year Federal Reserve charter in 1913, they were also promising to use their “own” gold to back American currency. Gold standards and pricing has always been the Jews’ and kings’ passion to keep it high and stable … One of the oldest civilisations known to man, the Sumerians of Mesopotamia, who lived in what is modern-day Iran and Iraq, first used gold as sacred, ornamental, and decorative instruments in the fifth millennium B.C.

[...]

Caucasian/Khazar Jews have infiltrated all levels of US federal government and will shortly precipitate total sovietization of America to facilitate the Jews’ plot to loot the country of the last of the privately held wealth in Gentile hands

We have a deteriorating financial system set up to enrich a few very wealthy Jews and screw everyone else.

They loan us money that doesn’t even exist as backed by anything but chutzpah and charge the USA interest on it just the same as minted Judefetzen … any fiat cash is bad … all fiat cash is detrimental … Hitler money was backed by labor at first and later trade … that is putting it mildly … and the financial civil workers who enriched Germany with new found prosperity are the most unsung heroes of the Reich … This system spread to Austria; and Germany was able to help Poland and Czechoslovakia’s economies as well as a preventive measure against communists and the Jewish banking that always seems to be present in communist countries and nations under ZOG occupation.

How can a price of metal go from $20-30 to $1600 … the product doesn’t become more valuable, but the price of the said commodity just goes up from manipulation … We all know here that Jews and banking are the curse of modern day economies, as Jews make all the rules and devastate all manor of industry to buy it cheap or run it into the ground and bankrupt it, so they can get rid of the unions and whites, and hire Indian and immigrant workers for less etc …

I’m only saying folks that if Hitler used fiat currency, it was still backed by labor and a promise of labor … This is how unemployment was literally destroyed by the new method … They did have one point where, after WW1, the Germans were burning marks by the millions for warmth … I don’t remember exactly, but it was nuts, like 30-40 million marks to a dollar … the way Hitler improved Germany is a mandatory subject for study, just as much if not more than how Jews use money swindles to fuck everyone over.

soulpeppersoup #fundie nairaland.com

You have a spiritual wife or sex partner whom you attracted by masturbation. Your being born again has dealt a great blow to your relationship with her. That is the reason for the attack.

Everyone who masturbates is oppressed by a demon. Such people if they engage in a hot night vigil they will be attacked most times by the demon covering or pressing them when they go to sleep. They hardly make progress financially.

That doesn't mean your not born again. If means your a baby child of God. If you enlighten your spirit with the word of God through meditation. Those devils oppressing you will disappear.

You can deal with that demon effectly by the knowledge of the word of God not by prayer alone. This is because, if you cast it out. It come back later more aggressively. That is why you hear many people here say you can't stop masturbation.

But when the light of God's word drives it out. It lighten you that it can not come again. You know the devil is darkness and light defeat darkness anytime anywhere

IMULTRAHARDCORE #fundie reddit.com

This sounds like he disagrees with our views. While that's not exclusive to "why the Alt Right will fail" the title gave me a different impression. I thought this was going to be more like a bone to pick with us not a take down. Anyway, small point. Continue.

"Alt Right claims whites are being replaced via immigration but there are more whites than ever"

This is true, which is somewhat of a white pill to the people here when you think about it, however that still doesn't account for demographic trends. So say historically there are 100 white people and I don't know, 20 non whites, in a white nation. Well now in modern times there are 1,000,000 white people and just 200,000 non whites. While that is a good thing on it's face (more whites than ever) pride comes before the fall. Birth rates tell the tale and whether it's 100 whites or 1,000,000 whites or 100,000,000 whites we are still about to be swamped by non white children while our own race is mostly below replacement levels in most cases. Now I'll note this with the caveat that trends rarely stay the same and so we can hope this is something that will change before whites are made minorities in their own lands but as it is the case that the demographic trends are what they are right now they are a concern right now. I don't see anything wrong with being concerned.

"Alt Right dismisses identity movements like BLM while engaging in the same identity politics"

This guy has us mixed up with the run of the mill conservatives on this issue. We don't dismiss or condemn BLM for being a racially motivated movement, we oppose them because they are anti white (and because they deal in factually incorrect propaganda (hands up don't shoot, can't breathe, good kid dindu nuffin, etc)). We generally support BLM's right to advocate for their race we just want to do the same.

"Alt Right claims Israel is a Jewish Ethno state even though it has a large population of Arabs"

This is correct and not something I'm entirely sure everyone here realizes. Regardless it was founded as a Jewish Ethno state so even though it's not 100% Jewish it's ideal is still to be mostly Jewish and Jewish controlled. That last part is the real key imo.
What's the solution?
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.

"A white ethno state can only exist via mass deportation or ethnic cleansing."

Correct. This guy says the Alt Right wont say it, and maybe the more public face like Spencer or Taylor wont, but many here in this sub will.
First of all millions of non whites who came here did so with the understanding they shouldn't be here. They were being let in by liberals and globalists who threw the gates wide for the fucking barbarians. They know they are taking advantage of whites and they don't care. This doesn't describe all non whites living in white nations but I believe it describes a very good portion, maybe half or more. So when the time comes to tell them to leave at the barrel of a gun I don't understand why anyone who is being reasonable or speaking in good faith could shed a tear or even speak out against it. These people were never here to assimilate, they were not here to enrich, they did nothing to better their host nations. They leeched off of the generosity of whites and committed untold crimes.

Secondly, to address the people who, perhaps, came here in good faith just to live a better life, well they should have known better. They should have done more to keep the third world out and stayed in the good graces of whites. Maybe they don't deserve to be forcibly removed but to be frank I don't care. I need to care about my people and my nation not the well being of foreigners. They have only themselves and their liberal/globalist friends to thank for uprooting their lives to live somewhere they don't belong.

In short: white nations exist, white nations have a right to exist, white nations have a right to exist as white nations. Anyone who says otherwise is being disingenuous or explicitly anti white. There is nothing wrong with defending our lands, with force if necessary.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy truthernews.wordpress.com

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Although the apartheid State of Israel has been touted as the “First Jewish State” since its official inception in 1949, the evidence detailed herein confirms beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Central European country of Switzerland was in-fact the first Jewish State.

While this fact has remained hidden since Switzerland was secretly founded in 1309, it has now been exposed for all the world to see. Consequently, it’s highly likely that I, David Chase Taylor, will be targeted for assassination, kidnapping or arrest for alleged antisemitism or other crimes this December of 2016.

According to the Encyclopaedia Judaica, the first documentation of Jews living in Switzerland dates back to 1214, roughly 95-years prior to the secret formation of Switzerland in 1309. In other words. Switzerland was home to Jews even prior to its official formation as a country.

This notion was reiterated by Wikipedia which states that the “History of the Jews in Switzerland reaches back at least a thousand years. Jews and Judaism have been present in the territory of what is now Switzerland since before the emergence of the medieval Old Swiss Confederacy in the 15th century”.

As revealed in the shocking book entitled “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014), Greenland is home to the one and only Greco-Roman Empire. Consequently, the Jewish people act at the behest of the Greco-Romans which is confirmed in-part by the fact that 90% of Roman holidays are Jewish holidays.

That is why the Jews are “God’s Chosen People” because the term “G.O.D.” is an acronym for “Greenland of Denmark”, the official name of Greenland. In other words, the Jews are “Greenland of Denmark’s chosen people” for they were specifically chosen by the Greco-Romans to rule the Underworld in their absence.

1. Jewish Symbololgy of Switzerland
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that the country of Switzerland is rife with Jewish symbology. Firstly, the flag of Switzerland contains four “Up Tack” symbols (i.e., “?”), otherwise known as the Hebrew letter entitled “U+FB29”. In order to hide this secret association, Jewish tradition was altered in the 19th century to write the “+”symbol as an inverted “T” symbol. Coincidentally, like the flag of Switzerland, four “Up Tack” symbols are found within the seal of the Society of Jesus (see photo above) which is mainly composed of Jews. Secondly, the Latin name of Switzerland as well as its country code is “CH” (i.e., ISO 3166-2:CH) which is consonantly speaking the same as “Chai” (C+H), a sacred Jewish symbol meaning “Life” or “Life Force”. In the medieval Kabbalah, Chai is the lowest (closest to the physical plane) emanation of God (i.e., Greenland of Denmark). That is because Switzerland’s primary role is to keep the Greco-Roman Empire safe which is exactly why it’s home to CIA Headquarters (see below). The acronym “CH” (i.e., Confoederatio Helvetica) numerically equates to the number “38” which is the addition of “19+19” or “S+S” which is consonantly speaking the same as Suisse (S+S), the original name of Switzerland. Lastly, because Switzerland was the first Jewish state, scores of Swiss cities feature the Jewish Star of David on their respective coat of arms (e.g., Aesch, Binningen, Birsfelden, Brig-Glis, Erlach, Glarus, Glarus Nord, Huttwil, Maienfeld, Meilen, Montreux, Ostermundigen, Rheinfelden, Sarnen, Spreitenbach, Volketswil, Wettingen, Zollikon, etc.).

2. Switzerland Home to CIA Headquarters
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it is home to the one and only Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). As originally depicted in the March 31, 2015, Truther.org report entitled “10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA”, evidence now confirms that Switzerland is in fact harboring the CIA. Exactly where CIA Headquarters was located within Switzerland remained a mystery until September 17, 2015, when Truther.org revealed that CERN is the secret entrance to CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva. That is why the thorny-like cross found in the logo of the CIA is reflected in: a) the seal of Geneva, Switzerland, b) the seal of the Society of Jesus whose Jesuits evidently run the CIA; and c) the thorny-like ring shape of the Lord Shiva Statue at CERN, entrance to CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geveva. Because Switzerland and her CIA’s job is to “sift” or “Siv” (i.e., Shiva) out potential threats to the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland, she is worshiped above all, namely through the likeness of Jesus (see below), the modern characterization of ISIS. In Judaism, Shiva is the name for the week-long mourning period after death which is derived from the Hebrew word “shiv’ah” which literally means “seven”. Consequently, the name of Shiva is intimately associated with Israel, Jews and Judaism, namely: a) Arutz Sheva, the name of an Israeli media network identifying with Religious Zionism; b) “Sh’va”, the name for the “20(2)” decimal in the Jewish Gematria’s “Mispar gadol; c) Shva, Hebrew niqqud vowel sign written as two vertical dots underneath a letter; d) Yeshiva, a Jewish institution that focuses on the study of traditional religious texts such as the Talmud; e) Yeshiva University, a private university with four campuses in New York City; and f) Yeshiva.co, a Jewish website which is part of the institutions of Yeshivat Beit El. Lastly, the notion that the CIA is Jewish in origin was foreshadowed by the television series entitled “Homeland” (2011-Present) which features the Jewish character of Saul Berenson (Mandy Patinkin) as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Since art imitates life, real-life Directors of the CIA have also been of Jewish ethnicity, namely John M. Deutch who served from May 10, 1995 until December 15, 1996.

3. Switzerland Home to Society of Jesus
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that the city of Geneva, Switzerland is home to the Society of Jesus, a strictly male order of the Roman Catholic Church whose members are called Jesuits. The Jesuits are engaged in what they call evangelization in 112 nations on 6 continents, boasting Jesuit colleges and universities in over 100 nations around the world. In Eugène Sue’s best-selling book entitled “Le Juif errant” (1844), or “The Wandering Jew” in English, she states that the Jesuits are a “secret society bent on world domination by all available means”. Considering that Jesus Christ was of Jewish ethnicity, it stands to reason that the Society of Jesus is also Jewish. Although the Society of Jesus was purportedly founded in the General Curia of Rome, Italy via a Papal Bull from Pope Paul III on September 27, 1540, the seal of the Jesuits is found on the original flag and seal of Geneva, Switzerland. The thorny-like seal of the Jesuits is reflected in the Sacred Heart symbol which represents the most widely practiced and well-known Roman Catholic devotions, taking Jesus Christ’s physical heart as the representation of His divine love for humanity. The “physical heart” is representative Switzerland which itself is shaped like a heart (see below). Due to the inherently Jewish nature of Roman Catholic Orders, the term “Jesuit” was likely derived from the terms “Jew Suits”. Similar to playing cards, different suits serve different purposes as each suit or respective order is compartmentalized (i.e., not knowing what the other is doing and for what purpose). In short, it appears that the Jesuits are the military order of the Roman Empire who routinely carry out assassinations, conduct espionage, stage terror attacks and trigger wars. According to the book entitled “Vatican Assassins” by Eric Jon Phelps, the man responsible for ordering these nefarious deeds is none other than the “Black Pope“, the Jesuit Superior General. This notion is essentially confirmed by Wikipedia which states that “The Superior General of the Society of Jesus is the official title of the leader of the Society of Jesus—the Roman Catholic religious order, also known as the Jesuits. He is generally addressed as Father General. The position sometimes carries the nickname of the Black Pope…”. It is imperative to note that the Black Pope is the unseen hand of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland who retains command and control of the Underworld via CIA Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. The title of the “Black” Pope is self-evident for he is never seen, always remaining in the dark.

4. Switzerland is Jesus (Suisse is ISIS)
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it is home to the the Society of Jesus (i.e., the Society of ISIS) in Geneva, Switzerland. In Latin, the name of the “Society of Jesus” is “Societas Iesu”. This is because the name “Iesu” (S+S) was originally derived from the Greco-Roman goddess of “ISIS” (S+S), the patroness of witchcraft and magic. Consequently, the seal of the Society of Jesus contains the letters “IHS”. Because the letter “I” was formerly an “S” in the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet), the seal of the Jesuits can also be read as “SHS”. Since the letter “H” in the Roman Score is pronounced “Ch” or “Chi”, meaning “Life Force”, the seal of the Jesuits can be read as “ISIS Chi” or “Chi ISIS”, meaning “ISIS is life” or “Life is ISIS”. That is why ISIS (i.e., Jesus) is worshipped above all other gods for the very life of the Greco-Roman Empire depends on it. Consequently, the goddess of ISIS (S+S) is consonantly speaking the same as “Suisse” (S+S), the original name of Switzerland. That is why Jesus is routinely depicted with the Sacred Heart (see above photo) which coincidentally contains a Swiss cross burning above a heart that is wrapped in thorns. The heart is symbolic of the country of Switzerland which itself is shaped in the form of an actual heart. The thorns are indicative of the aforementioned Society of Jesus (whose seal contains thorns in the form of Sun rays and spikes), as well as the CIA (whose logo contains cross flanked by thorny spikes). The name of “Jesus” (J+S+S), which may be an acronym that is pronounced as “Jew ISIS”, is consonantly speaking quite similar to Esus (S+S) and Hesus (H+S+S), a Celtic god worshiped in Scotland which coincidentally mirrors the Greco-Roman goddess of ISIS (S+S). That is why 18th century Druidic revivalist Iolo Morgannwg identified Esus (S+S) with Jesus (J+S+S) based on the strength of the similarity of their respective names. The Ichthys, a basic symbol consisting of two intersecting arcs that resemble the profile of a fish, was reportedly used as a Christian symbol in the first decades of the 2nd century. Its popularity among Christians was allegedly due to the fact that the five initial letters of the Greek word for fish (ICHTHYS) describes the character of Christ: “Iesous Christos Theou Yios Soter” (??s??? ???st??, Te?? ????, S?t??), meaning “Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior”. In other words, “Iesous” (S+S) was the first word to describe the deity that is now called Jesus. The Catholic Church corroborated this notion a few hundred years later when Pope John Paul II published a declaration on August 6, 2000, officially declaring that the title of Dominus Iesus means “The Lord Jesus” in English. Although the vowels have been changed (the former alphabet known as the Roman Score did not contain vowels), the consonant letters of “S” and “S” stay the same. In other words, Iesus (S+S) is the official name of Jesus according to the Catholic Church who not only wrote the Holy Bible but are admittedly the “sole Church of Christ” according to the Nicene Creed. Naturally therefore, they have the final word on the official name of Jesus. Consequently the worship of Esus, Hesus, Iesous, Iesus or Jesus is the unintentional worship of the Greco-Roman goddess of ISIS. Lastly, the main progenitor and propagator of Jesus (i.e., ISIS) is non-other than the Roman Catholic Church whose Pope is protected by the Swiss Guard. That is why the flag of Switzerland and the flag of Vatican City boast the only square sovereign-state flags in the world, making them the only two sovereign nations on Earth. In other words, Switzerland and Vatican City rule the entire world. The notion that Switzerland is Greco-Roman in origin is corroborated by the fact that a Greek Cross adorns the flag of Switzerland. The notion that the Jews are acting at the behest of the Greco-Roman Empire is corroborated by the fact that the Jews wear a Yamaka or Kippah (i.e., a Roman Catholic Zucchetto) which symolize the Roman Dome found in virtually every city on Earth. Although these caps tend to vary in color, the Kippah and the Zucchetto are symbolic of the Greco-Roman’s domination (i.e., dome) over humanity, mostly due to their horrific use and abuse of the Jewish race.

5. Jewish Immigration to Switzerland via Scotland
Although Aristotle claimed that the Jews originally emanated from India where they were known as the “Kalan” (C/K+L+N), a term which is consonantly speaking is the same as “clan” (C/K+L+N), evidence now suggests Jews originally immigrated to Switzerland via the Isle of Ewe in Scotland. According to Wikipedia, “The earliest date at which Jews arrived in Scotland is not known. It is possible that Jews visited Scotland at the time of the Roman Empire‘s conquest of southern Britain, but there are no records of this”. This is likely because the history of the Jews in Scotland is secret and has therefore been erased from the history books. Since the term “Ewe” is alternatively pronounced “Yew” (\'yü\) as in “Jew” (\'jü\), there are two competing theories about the meaning of the island’s name. Either it was derived from the Old Irish “eo” meaning “yew tree”, a possible reference to the lineage of the Jewish race which was spawned from the island, and/or it was derived from the Gaelic “eubh” meaning “echo” for the island was responsible for echoing Greco-Roman policy in the Underworld. Interestingly, the term “clan” is defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as: a) a Celtic group especially in the Scottish Highlands comprising a number of households whose heads claim descent from a common ancestor, b) a group of people tracing descent from a common ancestor, and c) a group united by a common interest or common characteristics. Although only conjecture, this is likely where the Scottish Rite (i.e., Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry) was originally derived from. Consequently, the links between the Jesuits and their Society of Jesus now headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland and the Scottish Rite are unmistakable. According to C. Lenning’s “Encyclopedia of Freemasonry” (c. 1822), King James II of England resided at the Jesuit College of Clermont in Paris where his followers “fabricated certain degrees [of Freemasonry] for the purpose of carrying out their political ends”. The boot-shaped Isle of Ewe, the boot-shaped Swiss canton of Bern, as well as the boot-shaped building of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland, are all a tribute to the original boot of Italy which is a tribute (no pun intended) to the boot of the Greco-Roman Empire which has been placed on the collective throat of humanity, namely through the use of fiat currency and theh practice of usury. This is likely where the terms “bank” and “banks” were originally derived from for gold and silver was delivered to the “banks” of the Isle of Ewe by the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland. This notion is corroborated by the coat of arms of the Isle of Ewe which depicts a U-shaped Greco-Roman Clipper ship. Lastly, the term “I love you”, possibly the most famous three words ever spoken, were evidently derived from the Isle of Ewe which sounds like “I love you” when pronounced. The term “I Love You” could also mean “I Leave Jew” for the Greco-Roman Empire chose to leave the Jews to rule the Underworld in their absence.

6. Switzerland Home to First Zionist Congress
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it was home to the First Zionist Congress which was held in Basel, Switzerland from August 29, 1897, until August 31, 1897. Since then, Switzerland has been home to 15 out of 22 Zionist congresses. The First Zionist Congress was the inaugural congress of the Zionist Organization (ZO) which later became the World Zionist Organization (WZO) in 1960. The founder and chairman of the inaugural event was Theodor Herzl who wrote in his diary on September 3, 1897, that “Were I to sum up the Basel Congress in a word – which I shall guard against pronouncing publicly – it would be this: At Basel I founded the Jewish State. If I said this out loud today l would be greeted by universal laughter. In five years perhaps, and certainly in fifty years, everyone will perceive it”. Needless to say, the creation of the alleged “First Jewish State” of Israel in Switzerland was a colossal hoax designed in-part to sell the fraudulent notion that Switzerland was not in fact the first Jewish State.

7. Switzerland Home to World Jewish Congress
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it is home to the one and only World Jewish Congress (WJC) which was founded in August of 1936 in Geneva, Switzerland, home to the aforementioned CIA and Society of Jesus. According to its mission statement, the World Jewish Congress’ main purpose is to act as “the diplomatic arm of the Jewish people”. Consequently, the WJC has special consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council. The main aims of the organization are to create “a worldwide Jewish representative body based on the concept of the unity of the Jewish people, democratically organized and able to act on matters of common concern”. Exactly what role the WJC plays in international politics is not known, but the fact that it is never discussed publicly on radio or television suggests that it plays a vital role.

8. Switzerland Home to Jewish Intellectuals
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it has long been a haven for Jewish intellectuals. In other words, Jews have always felt safe living in Switzerland. Russian Jew Chaim Weizmann stated in his diary from 1898 that “If Russian Jewry was the cradle of my Zionism, the Western universities were my finishing schools. The first of these schools was Berlin, with its Russian-Jewish society; the second was Berne, the third Geneva, both in Switzerland”. In other words, Switzerland has played a vital role in the global propagation of Zionist ideology. Consequently, Switzerland has been home to a plethora of notebale Jews, namely: a) Georgi Valentinovich Plekhanov, a Marxist theoretician who founded the social-democratic movement in Russia before fleeing to Switzerland in 1880 where he continued trying to overthrow the Tsarist regime in Russia; b) Leon Trotsky, a Marxist revolutionary and theorist who studied law in Switzerland prior to becoming a Soviet politician and founding leader of the Red Army who engineered the transfer of all political power to the Soviets with the October Revolution of 1917; c) Albert Einstein, a noted physicist and peace activist who grew up in Switzerland, received his doctorate from Federal Polytechnic Academy in Zurich, and was employed by the Swiss patent office; d) Zev Jabotinsky, a “reporter” in the Swiss capital city of Bern for the Russian press and was elected as a Russian delegate to the Sixth Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland in 1903; and e) Ruth Dreifuss, the first-ever woman President of Switzerland from January 1, 1999, until January 1, 2000.

9. Switzerland Home to Global Banking System
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it is home to the global banking establishment, which rightly or wrongly so, has been accused of being Jewish in nature. Due to the wealth attained by the Knights Templar (who originally founded Switzerland along with the Order of Saint John), Switzerland began to develop a massive economic infrastructure within Europe, creating financial techniques that became the earliest forms of banking. Although the primary mission of the Order was militarial in nature, only 10% of its members were actual combatants. In 1150, the Templars in Switzerland began generating letters of credit for pilgrims traveling to the Holy Land (i.e., Israel). In short, pilgrims deposited their valuables with a local Templar preceptory (bank) in Switzerland before leaving. In turn, they received an official document stating the value of their deposit. When they returned from the Holy Land, they would use said official document to retrieve their funds in an amount of treasure of equal value. This innovative arrangement was an early form of banking that eventually led to the formal system known today as checks. In time, the Templars established financial networks across the known world. They acquired large tracts of land, bought and managed farms and vineyards, built castles and churches, became involved in manufacturing, both import and export, and purchased their own fleet of ships. Consequently, the Order of the Knights Templar arguably became the world’s first multinational corporation. The Templars involvement in banking grew to the point where they began to practice usury, charging interest on money lent. According to a Templar researcher, “Since they weren’t allowed to charge interest, they charged rent instead”. Templar usury in Switzerland is evident today in Basel which is home to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the mother bank of all central banks. In short, the BIS creates money out of nothing and then charges countries (and their respective populations) interest on it, keeping them in a perpetual state of debt and economic slavery. Since interest rates can always be manipulated, no country can ever escape from their state of perpetual debt, no matter how hard they work. Admittedly “the world’s oldest international financial organization”, the BIS funds 60 central banks (e.g., Bank of China, Bank of England, Federal Reserve Bank, etc.), which collectively make up 95% of the world’s GDP (gross domestic product). Although the BIS bills itself as an international organization of central banks which attempts “to foster international cooperation in those areas and to act as a bank for central banks“, it is solely responsible for orchestrating the world’s financial crises simply due to the fact that it alone has the power to create fiat currency (i.e., “intrinsically valueless money used as money because of government decree”). In other words, the BIS is responsible for creating and distributing the world’s fiat money supply which is in turn used to fund the world’s respective governments, intelligence agencies and militaries, as well as the assassinations, terror attacks and wars they routinely engage in at the behest of the CIA. As the financial wing of the Central Intelligence Agency, the BIS is fiscally responsible for funding virtually all of the chaos and madness seen in our world today.

10. Israel Created as Political Cover for Switzerland
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that Switzerland, more than any other country on Earth, was responsible for the creation of the State of Israel. After all, Israel was created in-part as political cover for Switzerland, the first Jewish State. According to the Swiss government, “The establishment of the State of Israel is closely linked with Switzerland”. That is why as of 2015, the Swiss community in Israel is the largest in the Asian region, totaling roughly 18,702 persons. This is also why Switzerland has represented Israel’s interests in numerous countries (i.e., Hungary (1967–1989), Guinea (1967–1973), Ceylon/Sri Lanka (1970–1976), Madagascar (1973–1994), Liberia (1973–1983) and Ghana (1973–2002)). Conversely, Switzerland has represented the interests of Iran (1958–1987) and the Ivory Coast (1973–1986) in Israel. The name of “Israel” was created using a combination of Greco-Roman gods and goddesses, namely Isis, Ra and El (i.e., IS-RA-EL). Consequently, the name of Israel contains the name of ISIS (S+S) which is consonantly speaking the same as Suisse (S+S), the original name of Switzerland. In order to draw attention away from Switzerland and her CIA, Israel was shaped in the form of a dagger, a modern tribute to the Sicarii and their terrorism committed at the behest of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland. The term Sicarii comes from the Latin word “Sica”, meaning “dagger”. Consequently, the Sicarii, or the “dagger men”, were Jews who carried out assassinations and murders with short daggers in crowded places before slipping away. They also committed attacks in villages which they raided, plundered and set on fire in order to create fear among those who acquiesced or collaborated with Roman rule. They also kidnapped notables as leverage for the release of their own members which were being held prisoner. In short, the Sicarii Jews were used to commit terror attacks in order to destabilize the Roman Empire after the 13 Bloodlines of Rome vacated to Greenland. Titus Flavius Josephus wrote the only account of the activities of the Sicarii, stating: “…a different type of bandits sprang up in Jerusalem, the so-called Sicarii, who murdered men in broad daylight in the heart of the city. Especially during the festivals they would mingle with the crowd, carrying short daggers concealed under their clothing, with which they stabbed their enemies. Then when they fell, the murderers would join in the cries of indignation and, through this plausible behavior, avoided discovery”.

Anna Rountree #fundie mobile.facebook.com

After we arrived in Paradise, I found that I was sitting alone near a clear, round pool of water. On the opposite side of the pool, shrubbery was growing in geometric shapes—squares, rectangles, triangles, and circles. These shapes were reflected perfectly within the pool. Stacte was blooming behind the geometric shrubs. Each of these bushes was covered with waxy white blossoms that gave a mild, pleasant fragrance. I remembered that stacte was a spice used in the holy incense. But I could not remember the meaning inherent in its name. It was unusually still by the pool, like being in the eye of a hurricane. I swung my legs around, putting my feet into the water. They hardly made a ripple. Strange.
“Where am I?” I asked aloud.
“The pool of reflection,” a child’s voice answered from behind me.

CRYSTAL CLEAR

“Uh oh,” I said within myself because I recognized the voice. “Crystal Clear,” I smiled faintly as I turned to face her. There she stood, her hair still tousled as if from play. She was wearing the same pale shift and pinafore. She looked five or six years of age. However, she had old eyes. At times I could see through her arm or leg. She was a spirit. “You have come back to see us,” she exclaimed cheerily. “We L-O-V-E, love you,” she continued, spelling out the word love as if it were in a child’s song.

I sighed painfully within myself as I remembered the last time I had seen her. “But,” I thought, “perhaps this time will be different.” I decided to ask her about the pool. “What is the pool of reflection?”
“It is a place where you can see yourself very clearly,” she said.
I was not sure that I liked that idea. “Does one wish to reflect upon oneself?” I asked coolly, my flesh suddenly rising up and being as sly, legalistic, and evasive as the flesh always is.
She continued as though she did not notice. “You might want to take a look to see if you are cooperating with God or resisting Him. Do you want to look into the pool?” she asked brightly.

THE DECISION

Of course I did not want to look into the pool. However, I was beginning to hear in my own voice, as well as in the hardness of my heart, my resistance to correction.
Shortly before arriving at the pool I was telling the Lord that I would give up anything and everything in order to gain more of Him. Now with my first opportunity to allow this declaration to become experiential in my life, I was balking. “Do you think I should look?” I asked limply.
“It might help,” she replied.

With a sigh I took my feet out of the water and lay down on my stomach to look into the pool. I was amazed. I saw Jesus’s face reflected in the water instead of my own. But there were geometric objects stuck onto His head and face. “What are these objects?” I asked.

“Blocks,” she said. “You are blocking Him. They make the face of Jesus look really ugly.”
“How do I get them off?” I asked with alarm.
She leaned over to look at my face in the pool. “Hmmm,” she said, as if making a diagnosis. “You need to unstick the glue.”
“Unstick the glue?” I asked. “How do I do that?”

REPENTANCE

“Repentance,” she said matter-of-factly.
“Repentance unsticks the glue.”
She pulled back to look at me directly instead of at my reflection. I sat up to look into her face. She shook her head from side to side as children do when correcting one another. Speaking in a slow, singsong manner, she said, “You’re too old to play with blocks.” Before I could answer her, she vanished.

STACTE

The strong smell of stacte flooded the area. I looked at the bushes. The fragrant gum was running down the branches. “Truth with mercy,” I said glumly, remembering now the inherent meaning within the name.

With a sigh I turned back to the pool. I looked into the water again. ‘The face, and therefore the life of Jesus, was definitely blocked from flowing to others. I gathered the courage to look at the blocks more closely. Each had writing on it. I squinted to decipher the lettering.

The BLOCKS

“Hypocrite” was written on one block. “Hypocrite,” I said with self-righteous indignation. Although indignant, I dared not try to refute this because I knew it to be true. ‘That which people on Earth might not see was plainly visible in heaven. Perhaps I might hide this from others, but I could not hide it from myself or from God. “I am a hypocrite”, I said, and You see it. I say that I am doing what I do out of obedience, not caring about the results, but I do care. I care greatly. I want success. I want to feel that I am accomplishing something.” I could not look at that block any longer.

I decided to look at another block. “Money” was written on it. “Oh, no,” I moaned. “Well, it is true. I say that I do not mind being poor, but I mind a great deal. I do not like being poor. I know that to live by faith pleases You, and I want to please You. But truthfully, it is easier to talk about faith than to live by it. At times I think, ‘If I just had enough money, I would never need to think about money again.” My confession made me uneasy. decided to look at another block.

“Being a star” was written on this block. My hands went to my face in embarrassment. True again, I confessed. It is difficult for me to live a hidden life. I want respect. I want honor. I want to be known. I want...” I almost said “glory.” As I confessed this sin, I was struck by the seriousness of it. “God, help mc,” I said. “I want Your glory” I shook my head. “This is serious, very serious. How have You taken me as far as You have taken me? How can You love me? How can You want me to be Your Son’s bride? In my spirit I know that I want to be on the inside that which I present on the outside. I know that I want to live by faith. I know that pride is a great sin. satan wanted Your glory. How am I better?”

The BLOOD

Saying that galvanized my thinking. “I am in a better place before You, Father, for my Lord and Savior died to release me from the penalty of death due to sin. And I can plead the blood of Jesus before You and ask that You forgive me for every sin, as well as for every transgression. I can proclaim to You that the Holy Spirit was sent to apply the cross to every act of the flesh within me.” I am in a better place.

“Then, Daddy,” I cried, “I ask for correction by the Holy Spirit. I ask for the cross. I ask that I be clean inside and outside. I want the life of Jesus to flow through me unhindered. I mean, Daddy, that I do not want one hindrance. I give You permission to bring me into a pure walk before You. I know it will hurt. I know it. But I give You permission to ignore my whining.”

TEARS

“O God, do not leave me as one dead.” I began to cry. “Forgive me. Wash me clean with the blood of Jesus—He who paid the ultimate price with His shed blood and death on the cross so that I might stand before You clean, in His righteousness.

I continued, “Deal with my flesh. Override my protests. Discount my whimpering. Please, please do not let me go around this mountain one more time. I do not want to live a halfhearted life, compromising at every turn because I do not want the pain of the cross.” I wept bitterly. “And I miss Jesus,” I cried. “I am in pain when we are apart!”

I realized suddenly that a very bright angel was near me catching in an alabaster bottle every tear that I cried. The tears would start down my cheeks and then automatically, obediently even, go into the vial. I was fascinated.

ANGEL OF PRAISE

I was so fixed upon this sight that I jumped a little when my name was called from behind me. It was Judy, the angel of praise.

She was dressed in a gossamer green under tunic bound with a golden girdle. Over this was a deeper green cloak that had long, oversized sleeves. These sleeves contained pockets that held all manner of golden musical instruments. Her neck, hands, and feet had a slight tint of gold. Her auburn hair was plaited into seven loops interlaced with gold. On her forehead was a small golden box, housing Scripture. She began to speak. “Anna, rejoice that you are loved. I am sent to comfort you with the mantle of praise.”

“What is that?” I asked, wiping my eyes with my hand. The bright angel with the vial for tears disappeared.

HYMN OF PRAISE

“Shh,” she said, putting her finger to her lips. “Let me help to calm your soul. Rest.” She became a small, green whirlwind. The wind and movement caused all the instruments within her robe to play together. The sound of praise was so pure that it seemed to draw angels from the air. They gathered in a large circle around her. She began to sing:

O great I AM, Eternal One,
Fountain of life within the Son,
Wellspring of blessing,
Wellspring of light,
Infinite mystery hid from our sight.
Searched by the Spirit,
Revealed through the Son,
Mystery unfolding, though ever begun.
Beginning and ending, great circle of light
That shatters the darkness, confounding the night.
All beauty, all joy, all splendor in One,
His grace freely shared through the life of His Son.
His life and His death and His life evermore,
Though crucified ever, to die nevermore.
All hail, Great Redeemer, All hail, Mighty King
Of Life and of Truth and of Light do we sing.
All praise, adoration, and thanksgiving,
Through time never ending, our homage we’ll bring.

GALBANUM AND CASSIA

As she sang, the aroma of galbanum and cassia filled the air. Galbanum bespeaks worship, adoration, thanksgiving, and praise.’ Cassia urges homage to God alone. I needed both. I needed the idols in my heart to be cast down. Also, I needed to be lifted up, out of myself; through turning my eyes toward Him in praise. Her song was like a mantle dropping upon me—lifting my spirit but settling my soul.

At the end of the song, the many angels that had gathered withdrew discreetly. Judy spoke. “Worship God, Anna. He alone is worthy.” Then she too disappeared.

GOD AT WORK

I was alone again. But the stillness near the pool was no longer a vacuum. It was closer to the stillness within my soul. The Lord had accomplished a work within me, although I did not know the nature of the work or how He had accomplished it. But I felt that I could see more clearly, that in some way I was different. The answer seemed simple. Jesus overcame the flesh when He walked the earth. Now He could overcome the flesh in me. He would work, and I would rest in Him. I felt cleansed, washed, with my soul as still as the round pool before me. However, the stilling of my soul made room for a greater longing for Him. The ache within my spirit had grown painfully acute. I missed Him. I wanted to be with Him. The pain was becoming a wracking hunger......

Seek His Face

John Baugh #fundie youtube.com

Rontow: I just want to correct you on one thing, as a Jew who read the entirety of the Tanach, Gehenna is not hell, it is a physical location called "guy Ben hinom" ("guy" meaning "valley", the "valley of the son of hinom") where Canaanite pagans (and heretic Jews at times) sacrificed their first born. There's no hell in the old testament (and Judaism), Gehenna is a physical location you can visit, though it is believed to be cursed (from the whole sacrificing thing)?

John Baugh: It was used by Jesus as a metaphor for Hell. And the Old Testament is full of the reality of Hell. With all due respect, Rabbinical Judaism of today is descended largely from the teaching of the Pharisees, and is a far cry from the sacrificial system under Abraham, and then Moses, instituted by God. Many (most?) Jews today do not acknowledgement an actual Hell, nor an actual Satan, and most I've spoken with don't acknowledge an actual Heaven or afterlife either. This is entirely contradictory of the teaching in the Tanakh (which I've also read many times.)?

?skylander king: I'm Jewish and the way I heard of Hell is as just a midpoint between being reincarnated if you didn't make it into Heaven the first few times. A boiling swamp where your soul would be tortured 6 days a week and only let out on Shabbat. I'm not sure how long this torture lasts for, only that it's not eternity.?

John Baugh: Well, the interpretation involving reincarnation is not consistent with the teachings in what we Christians refer to as the Old Testament (The Hebrew Bible, Tanakh.) Reincarnation is more of a pagan/far eastern/new age philosophy (probably introduced into Judaism by some sort of Kabbalah tradition.) Some of the confusion is because the New Testament uses terms that would have been more familiar to the Greek world (e.g., Hades, Tartarus), and then when English translations came about, the Nordic influence into English was clear, since the word "Hell" is from Germanic/Nordic tradition. But this doesn't mean the CONCEPTS were "borrowed" from the pagans. It's that that terms they could at least have some concept of could be used and clarified when needed. It is true that our knowledge of Hell is limited, but the souls definitely went to Sheol, sometimes also called "Mot" (although that is also a term borrowed from neighboring/conquered civilizations like the Canaanites for clarification.) I'd say that it's quite clear God says He was have vengeance and judgment upon sinners, and that this is a permanent state, if one makes a careful reading of Scripture a priority. (Isaiah 2:12; 13:6, 9; Ezekiel 13:5, 30:3; Joel 1:15, 2:1,11,31; 3:14; Amos 5:18,20; Obadiah 15; Zephaniah 1:7,14; Zechariah 14:1; Malachi. 4:5 are all decent references) Also, throughout history, God revealed Himself and how the universe works over time, so the earliest Jews didn't have all the information - there was a lot of mystery. For example, Jews then (and even still don't) didn't understand exactly who the Messiah would be. They assumed it would be a political figure that would save them from tyranny. This is why the Jews (Pharisees primarily) during the time of Jesus were assuming the Messiah would be someone to throw off the Roman conquerors, but in the same respect, they didn't want to rock the boat because Rome gave them quite a bit of autonomy. But, the prophecies about the Messiah throughout the OT says that He would be "bruised for our transgressions" and the "punishment that brought us peace was upon Him" (Isaiah 53 - which is CLEARLY NOT about anyone other than someone whose punishment can pay for your sins.) Furthermore, an enormous portion of the Old Testament/Tanakh points to Jesus as Messiah. And although this group gets a lot of hate from orthodox and non-Messianic Jews, I'd recommend they are a group to at least consider, as far as the points they have to make:

9nania #fundie indigoflower.net

In the previous examination, we looked at Genesis 1, which seems to describe the terraforming of the Earth by the Elohiym. Genesis 1 also indicates the Elohiym were a group of benevolent beings that were either Human or Humanoid, that were responsible for creating the conditions on Earth that would sustain life, and were also the ones who either created all life on the planet, or brought forth all the life; in other words, brought the life here.

In this examination, we are going to look at Genesis 2, which introduces the YHWH, who established ancient Mesopotamia and used cells from humans to create what seems to be a hybrid of both Gods and Humans used to breed with humans. We’ll be using the definitions of the Hebrew words from Blue Letter Bible.org, Bible Study Tools.com, and Bible Hub.com. The links are below if you want to follow along.

The King James Translation of Genesis Chapter 2 verse 1 says, “Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.” But the direct translation says, “The sky of the earth was complete and all war.” So we know the word for sky, number 8064, means “atmosphere.” So it can be translated, “The atmosphere of the earth was complete, and all…” number 3605, which means “the whole” or “all throughout”, and this word, number 6635 means “war” or “warfare”. So another translation of Genesis 2 verse 1 can say, “The atmosphere of the earth was completed then all throughout there was war.” In other words, sometime after humans were put here, wars began.

Then verse 2 in the King James Translation says, “And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.” So we know the word for “God”, number 430, means “Elohiym” and it is plural, so the word “his” should be “they”. Also notice the first word, “And” is not actually in the original text. So verses 2 and 3 can also read, “But on the seventh day the Elohiym ended their work which they had made; and they rested on the seventh day from all their work which they had made. So the Elohiym blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it; because that in it they had rested from all their work which the Elohiym created and made.” So this is saying, after the Elohiym made earth a paradise, there was war everywhere, but the 7th day is the blessed day, in other words, the 7000th year is the blessed millenium. This is important, its code, and we will see why later. But for now, we’ll continue with verse 4.

Notice verse 4 introduces a new name for God. All throughout Genesis 1, the word for God was number 430, which means “Elohiym”, and in Genesis 2 it remains “Elohiym” until verse 4. Then the name for God changes. The King James translation says, “These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens.” So notice the word “God” number 430, which means “Elohiym” is still present, but this word “LORD” in all capital letters is now introduced. In the Old Testament, the word translated as “LORD” in all capital letters, is usually, but not always, word number 3068, which is “Yehovah”. We discussed in a previous video that the original hebrew word was “YHWH” without the consonants, and is sometimes pronounced “Yahweh” or “Jehovah”. Hosea 13 tells us YHWH acts as the Beasts of Daniel, and Revelation 13 tells us YHWH is the Beast with 7 Heads and 10 Horns. We also looked at Exodus 6:3 which says the Lord did not appear to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob by the name YHWH, but appeared to them by the name “God Almighty” or “El Shaddai”. This is a very important statement, because we know the word “YHWH” is used in all three of those stories in the bible. The current translations of the Bible tell us “YHWH” was the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. For example, if you look at Genesis 12 verses 1 and 2, it says the LORD told Abraham to leave his country and his father’s house and the LORD would make him a great nation. Well we know the word translated as “LORD” in Genesis 12 is “YHWH”, so there are only two possibilities here: Either Genesis 12:1 is correct, and YHWH was the God of Abraham, or Exodus 6:3 is correct and the God of Abraham was El Shaddai. Both verses cannot be true. So because Hosea 13 and Revelation 13 explain for us that YHWH is the Beast, it seems that Genesis 12:1 has to be false and Exodus 6:3 is giving us a clue that the texts have been altered. That is confirmed in Jeremiah 8:8. The King James Translation says, “How do you say, ‘We are wise and the law of the LORD is with us?’ Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain.” But when we look at this word translated as “vain”, number 8267, we can see it is translated the majority of the time as “false” or “falsehood”. So Jeremiah 8:8 is telling us the pen of the scribes is in falsehood, and that seems to confirm what Exodus 6:3 is telling us; that Abraham didn’t know God by the name YHWH, yet the name YHWH was inserted into the story of Abraham. Jeremiah indicates that is because the pen of the scribes is in falsehood, in other words, the texts were altered. That doesn’t mean everything in the texts were altered, but it does mean at least some of it was. So we should use common sense when we read the material, for example, when we read in Exodus 30:16 that YHWH required money in order to make atonement for the souls of the Israelites, we can be sure that was not the Elohiym who terraformed the earth making it habitable for life, because they chose not to dominate the earth (which they had the full opportunity to do) but instead, they let humans have dominion on the earth. So this Lord in Exodus 30:16 sounds more like the Beast, who we are told acted as all four of Daniel’s Empires; the lion, the leopard, and the bear, which represent the Babylonian Empire, the Persian Empire, the Greek Empire, and the Roman Empire. That may be telling us that the texts were altered during that time period.

So as we go through Genesis 2 we’ll keep that in mind. The King James version indicates in verse 4 that YHWH created the whole earth, but we know that contradicts what Genesis 1 already told us; that the Elohiym created the earth. The Bible itself tells us YHWH is the Beast, and the word itself, number 3068, stems from the word 1961, which means “fall out”, and that word is compared to word 1933, which also means “to fall”, and that word is compared to word 0183, which means “to covet” or “be greedy”.

So verses 4 and 5 in the King James translation say, “These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens. And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew, for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.” And the first word, number 428, means “these” but it also means “those”, so it can also be translated, “Those were the generations when the heavens and the earth were created.” And we already know the word translated as “heavens” means “atmosphere”. So the first part of verse 4 says, “Those were the generations when the atmosphere of the earth was created.” Then it says, “The day that YHWH Elohiym made…”, or word number 6213, which also means “acquired”. So it says, “The day that YHWH acquired the earth and the atmosphere, every plant of the field…” or, word number 7704, which means “cultivated field” and the definition of the word “cultivated” is “Raised or grown on a farm or under other controlled conditions.” So its saying, “the plants cultivated…” Then this word 2962 means “not yet”. So it says, “The plants were not yet cultivated, or grown under controlled conditions in the earth…” or number 776, which also means land. So, “The plants were not yet grown under controlled conditions in the land and the herbs were not yet grown. Then this word translated as “for”, number 3588, means “because”, this word number 369 means “not”, the word translated as “man”, number 120, is adam, which means “mankind” or “human being” what we would call in modern language “humans”, and the word 5647 means “to serve as subjects” or “to make oneself a servant”. So verses 4 and 5 can be translated, “Those were the generations when the atmosphere of the earth was created. And in the day that YHWH God acquired the earth and the atmosphere, the plants were not yet in cultivated fields in the land and herbs were not yet grown under controlled conditions because YHWH God had not caused it to rain on the land, and humans were not made servants to till the ground. Then there went up a mist from the land and watered the surface of the ground.” So that makes sense because the Elohiym did not put Humans on earth to be servants. In Genesis 1 it told us the Elohiym made the earth habitable, and put the plants and trees here for food and gave humans dominion over everything, but it did not say they forced humans to farm the food. It said the plants and fruit trees had their seed in themselves. Now its saying, in the day when YHWH acquired the earth, plants were not being cultivated. So the humans were not growing their food under controlled conditions when YHWH acquired the earth. Then it says YHWH caused a mist to come up from the ground, and that sounds like some form of irrigation.

- See more at: http://indigoflower.net/genesis-2-yhwh-mesopotamia-the-hybrids/#sthash.YUgBZY6x.dpuf

Pastor Mark Downey #racist kinsmanredeemer.com

Most uprisings against jews during the past 2000 years have developed from the discovery of this syndicated and institutionalized crime. There is a trickle-down application for those jews who do not participate in the actual crime scenario. The ritual blood is used in other ways by drying it for use in weddings, funerals, circumcisions, pregnancies and older jews believing they can become younger by ingesting it. The remainder of the blood is preserved with the greatest of care by the local rabbis and sold in small bottles as certified Christian blood. Catholic scholar, James E. Bulger, states that the drinking of blood is a black magic ritual which enables the jewish rabbis to predict the future. During the jewish Passover, a jewish father will mock the Christian communion by pouring a few drops of ritualized blood into a glass of wine and sprinkles the dinner table saying, "We beg God to send down the ten plagues upon the enemies of the Jewish religion" and after they wine and dine, he says "Thus (like the child whose blood has been mixed in the bread and wine) may all Goyim burn in hell!" Make no mistake about it, jewish ritual murder is still going on today and all levels of government do nothing, because they are up to their necks in whitewash and cover-ups. Those who know what's going on keep their mouths shut and receive their 30 pieces of silver. Why would jews stop now in this day and age when they're on a roll?

munkees81 #fundie answers.yahoo.com

I was completely anti-teletubbies.... then one day my son saw it and fell in love with them. I didn't like it, but he wouldn't stop talking about them, so I figured "Why not? What harm could it possibly do"? Well he's been watching the show for about 2 weeks now. He is only 2 1/2, and his vocabulary is outstanding. Lately, I've noticed that he is starting to babble. For example, when he doesn't want to do something I tell him, he says something like "No ca cow"! (he used to just say no, don't like it) I always believed that the rumors that the teletubbies promoted homosexuality, and that was confirmed for me today. My son wanted to play teletubbies games on sprout.com, and I found one called "dirty knees"... the whole game was to clean the teletubbies dirty knees. As of today, I will no longer let my son watch this show, no matter how badly he cries. I really believe that it's affecting his vocabulary and I also believe it promotes and encourages homosexuality. What are your thoughts?

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

Iranian President Knows Holocaust Was False Flag Terror Attack to Invade Palestine

It was Communist-Marxist-Zionist, false (Khazar) Jews, who put Israel back on the map in 1948. The President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is a very educated man, who handles himself well in media debate. President Ahmadinejad makes some excellent points, asking WHY the Palestinians were forced away from their Palestinian homeland in 1947-1948 for crimes they'd never committed. Palestinians hadn't done anything to cause the Jewish holocaust, so how did a Holocaust over in Europe end up costing thousands of Palestinian lives, their homes and being displaced throughout the land of Palestine without a place to live? It is wickedness!!! The Jews lost their land way back in 586 B.C. under the invasion of King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon.

If honest Jews in 1948 wanted their land back, they should have made an offer to buy those houses for whatever price the home owners wanted. If the U.S. government could afford billions for bullets, tanks and bombs, they could have afforded to pay 10-times more than what the Palestinian's homes were worth, since it was their homes anyway! Instead, British-led forces kicked in their front doors and drove the Palestinian people out at gun-point to go live anywhere but here. The land with homes and all were just given to Jews. Now you know why so many Muslim are still angry 67 years later.

Everyone today knows that the Indians owned this great land in America before we ever stole it all from them. How is this any different than Zionist-controlled military powers taking control over Israel and driving out all of the Muslims, permanently? Do American Indians have a right to force us all out, kill us if need be, to reclaim the land that was formerly theirs? There could have been a resolution made in 1948 to restore the nation of Israel. It would have been manmade of course, because it is not God's timing yet. God will restore Israel when He comes at the Second Coming and not before. There is absolutely no reason whatsoever, in the least way, to believe that God is behind the present-day secular state of Israel. Why would God uses reprobate Godless leaders, to drive-out Godless unbelieving Muslims, just to replace them with Godless unbelieving Jews? God always works by faith, not because men have an agenda.

The Middle Easy is Being Conquered as Planned

The creation of Israel in 1948 was the birth of World War III. Already, the same Communist-Marxist powers which have taken over Israel and the United States, have also taken over Iraq and Afghanistan. After conquering their nations. They bring in two Illuminati puppets for the newly elected Democratic leader. The people are told they have a choice in voting, Democracy! What a scam! In reality, their control is GONE, GONE, GONE! Next on their Illuminati hit list is Syria, whom they've been blaming lately for attacking Jordan. Isis is another Boogie-man like Al-Qaeda (Al-CIA-da). Whatever it takes, the Illuminati will demonize Syria and take them out! Then Jordan. Then Iraq last (or some order that that). The Illuminati will conquer all of the middle East! That's why the wanted Israel in 1948. Albert Pike predicted WWI, WWII, and WWIII before his death in 1892. Pike has been 100% accurate so far. The reason why is because it was all PLANNED this way. Please read, THREE WORLD WARS!

Israel was not restored in 1948 as a Theocracy, i.e., a Jewish State. No, but rather, it was birthed as a Communist-Marxist, Democratic, secular state (as signed-off by U.S. President Harry Truman. According to FBI files, Truman took a pen and scratched out reference to a “new Jewish state,” and just left it as a “new state”). God does not recognize the present-day Marxist-Communist, state of Israel. Less than 2.5% of Israel's inhabitants today profess to be a Christian at all. With all the hundreds-of-millions of dollars collected from religious groups, Zionist charities and other sources, Israel's owners have billions! Yet, nearly 200,000 Holocaust survivors live in near poverty in Israel. Where's all that money that they collect to help the Jews? It goes in their pockets!!!

Iran President Ahmadinejad wants to know why people who simply ask question as to the validity of the Holocaust are immediately attacked, told to be quiet and don't ask questions. Even the Word of God in the Bible is open to be questioned. Yet, the Zionists refuse to engage in any serious historical efforts to find out what really happened during WWII.

Just as the BIG LIE of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD's) were used by The White House through the puppet Zionist mainstream newsmedia to fool Americans into supporting the invasion and overthrow of the nation of Iraq; even so also was the Holocaust of millions of Jews (the exactly number is likely way too high), used as an excuse to invade and conquer Palestine, driving out all Muslim families and replacing them with whoever they wanted. The Marxist-Communist powers of the Illuminati couldn't have cared less about a new state of Israel as concerns God's promises. It was about taking control of the once Holy City for Satan, so that when the Antichrist (BEAST) comes, he will stand up in the rebuilt Illuminati temple and proclaim to be God, demanding worship (Revelation 13:15). The center of the world Biblically is Jerusalem.

The nation of Israel was God's in the Old Testament (the apple of His eye). It ceased to exist in BC 486 because of Israel's continuous spiritual adultery. The manmade state of Israel that exists today is not blessed of God. It is not a holy nation, nor a holy people. God is not their God, because they openly reject the Son of God, Jesus Christ!!! Likewise, Muslims reject Jesus as the Messiah. Thus, both the Arabs and the Jews cannot get along, hating each other, both rejecting the Savior by which they could be born-again and see the great light of our God and of the truth. Judaizer Jews are as spiritually blinded as Zionist Jews, as are Talmud Jews, as are Khazar Jews! They all need to be born-again by believing the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ!!!

Michael Williams #racist #wingnut amren.com

A Young White Man’s Struggle with Identity

This is part of our continuing series of accounts by readers of how they shed the illusions of liberalism and became race realists.

I am a white man in his mid-twenties who grew up in a middle-class home. My mom was a liberal public school teacher and was passionate about helping “oppressed” immigrants and minorities. She taught at inner-city schools and worked as a missionary in Haiti and Mexico. Looking back, I realize I was deeply influenced by her — especially since I had no real father figure. I was taught to not see color, and that in general, the reason why minorities and immigrants struggle in America was because of racist whites.

I was a rebellious teenager, and made plenty of trouble for myself throughout high school. Eventually, my bad behavior made my mom decide to pull me out of my majority white school and enroll me in the almost exclusively black school she taught at. She thought the black kids would “straighten me out” and “show me what it’s really like to have it bad” — but that isn’t what happened. Instead, I ended up coming to admire the black “gangster/thug life” and started using drugs and causing as much trouble as ever.

The next year she sent me back to the majority white school I had been pulled out of, but the trouble didn’t stop. I began using more and more drugs, and became addicted to Oxycontin. After that it was a downward spiral. I was willing to do anything to get the drug, and I started hanging around bad characters. By the end of high school, I was selling drugs and robbing people in order to fund my addiction.

Not long after I graduated, my parents kicked me out and I started “couch-surfing,” while still selling and using drugs. This ended with me going to a treatment center for a year and a half — but once I left, I quickly picked up my bad habits once again. I started selling crack and other drugs in a black ghetto, and my life was centered around getting high. But I soon found that I was not welcome there, and even hated. Not because I was dealing drugs, but just because I was white and operating in black “turf.” That period of my life was marked by many fights, a lot of close calls, and a revolving door of jail cells, treatment centers, and homelessness.

In the midst of all this chaos, I fathered a child with a black girl. Though nobody in my white family was bothered by this, some of my black “friends” and relatives of the mother openly voiced their disapproval of interracial relationships. Regardless, becoming a father motivated me to grow up, become a man, and change so I could be a good dad to my daughter. I sobered up and started working any job I could get.

My change in lifestyle made me start to think about race. As I was working hard, my “homies” still came around, but they never wanted to do anything but get high and get into trouble. A lot of my “friends,” most of them black, drifted away from me because I was doing something positive with my life instead of destroying it with drugs and crime. That was too “lame” for them. One of my closest black friends began constantly lamenting the fact that I was changing and wasn’t “the good old guy who just wanted to kick back and get high” anymore. But he still hung around, so I would say things to him like, “Hey I know we both have criminal records and drug problems, but if I can get sober and work to have a decent life, so can you.” I tried to be a positive influence, but he always had excuses.

One day, I told him, “I’ll help you put your resume together and I’ll take you to go apply to some jobs.” He said he would do it, but when I picked him up, he just wanted to get high and went on a long speech about oppression saying, “You don’t know how hard it is for a black man in America, it might be easy for you to just go and get a job, but not for me.” I asked him, “What makes you assume that it was easy for me? Just because I’m white?! And second, how are you going to cry victim when you haven’t even honestly tried to work hard or change? I’m offering to help you get a resume together, but you want to get high instead? No one is holding you back but yourself.” We argued and then went our separate ways.
Many blacks would rather live the “thug life” than work hard to make an honest living. Yet they make excuses, blame society, the police, and the white man for all their problems. Some blacks are hell bent on destroying themselves and everyone around them because they feel like victims, and they will never take any personal responsibility. I came to realize that the only thing I had ever had in common with blacks like that was a victim mentality and the desire to get high. Once I stopped being a victim and sobered up, none of them wanted anything to do with me anymore. Now that I was doing positive things with my life, they weren’t even happy for me, just envious.

I moved on and kept to myself in the years that followed. And after a few years of hard work and self-improvement, I got back together with the mother of my child and we moved in together. I was proud that I didn’t make excuses for myself, and did the hard work I needed to do to get my family back together, and made myself into the man and father they needed me to be. I don’t regret any of this. I did not want my child to grow up without a father, like I did. Fatherlessness is a huge issue in America today, leading to all kinds of dysfunction.

With my life in order, I turned my focus to education and the pursuit of truth. I dove into topics such as psychology, history, economics, politics, and ultimately — race. The more I learned, the more unconvinced I was by the “blue-pill” liberal worldview I grew up believing. When I discovered race realism, I was impressed by how many facts and statistics lined up with my own experiences living as a criminal in “the hood.” From there, I discovered the alarming realities of the “great replacement,” liberal censorship, and the violence committed by antifa and Black Lives Matter. The more I dove into the facts, the more I saw that Ben Shapiro, Jordan B. Peterson, Charles Murray, and Jared Taylor were telling the truth. Simultaneously, I realized how insidious the Left was in trying to smear, censor, shame, and shut down these thinkers. It was at this time that Donald Trump was elected, and I began seeing the protests, riots, rage, and unrest coming from the left. A political line in the sand was being drawn, and the Left was no longer open to dialogue: they were only interested in taking power by force.

White liberals claim to be on the side of minorities and other “oppressed” groups, but they know nothing about them. As a white man who lived the thug life in the hood for over eight years, I know that they hate the white liberals’ pandering, and when white boys imitate them. Most of them hate the idea of assimilating into white America: they want their own jurisdictions, culture, and rules — and they hate when whites intrude, peacefully or otherwise. Believers in the “melting pot” theory have never lived in a black community, but they like to imagine that they are great “warriors” and activists for justice and equality.

As a white man, and as a father to a black and white child, I felt that fully understanding racial issues was an absolute must. My daughter’s mother and I had many conversations about these matters, and — fortunately — she agreed with almost everything I was discovering about race. She saw the destructive tendencies of blacks firsthand. When she worked hard at her job or studied hard in school, other blacks were jealous and treated her with contempt for “acting white.” She has never been able to understand why most blacks have such a big chip on their shoulders, hate whites, and maintain a victim mentality when they never experienced slavery or Jim Crow themselves.

She doesn’t make excuses for her own shortcomings and has never cared that other blacks claim she isn’t “really black” or hated her for her success or for having a child with a white man. Because of this, our family remains strong and united. Some may accuse her of hating her own race, but the truth is simply that she refuses to buy into the lies and propaganda that blacks must fight against whites in order to succeed. She loves her own people, family, and race. She also appreciates and respects white culture and realizes that whites built this country and made it prosperous. She loves America, and doesn’t want it to change, so she supports the national identity of America as a white nation, and has no desire to see it taken over by blacks, immigrants, or “social justice warriors.” I believe more and more blacks are waking up and coming to support America instead of hating it.

I may have a mixed child, but I am a full supporter of the US, the white race, our culture, and our honor. I will die before I see our great country defiled and overtaken by leftists and foreigners who hate our culture and want to replace it with theirs. My grandfathers both died to defend this land, and it is my duty to do the same if the time comes — and every day it feels more and more like that day will come during my lifetime. The increasing amounts of censorship, indoctrination, government largesse, and white ethnomasochism that we see can make the future look bleak. But there is hope in the fact that if people wake up to the truth now — and stop being afraid to speak their minds — we can turn things around and preserve this great country — maybe even make it greater.

Janet Porter #fundie wnd.com

The one time [same-sex marriage] happened was: "During the days of Noah." When I first heard this, my mind immediately went to a verse I've heard many times but never with such relevance. The verse is found in Matthew 24:37. It reads:

As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. – Mathew 24:37 (NIV)

I used to read this verse and think: It was bad at lots of points in history; it doesn't necessarily mean now, but if these Jewish writings are true, we are uniquely like the "days of Noah" right now – and only right now.

But it can't be yet, you say. You have a lot going on in your life? You're getting married? Here's how the New Living Translation describes that very sentiment in Luke:

When the Son of Man returns, the world will be like the people were in Noah's day. In those days before the Flood, the people enjoyed banquets and parties and weddings right up to the time Noah entered his boat, and the flood came to destroy them all. – Luke 17:26-27

Happily going about as if everything was fine was what they did, too.

You don't like this possibility? Don't even believe in the Flood? Doesn't matter. Some things are true whether you believe them or not. How can you be sure? There's a way. Did you know that about one-fourth of the Bible is prophecy? A quarter of the Bible is a lot – it's a big book. And did you know God's standard? Perfection. That means that if even one of those prophecies is wrong, you can discount the whole thing. Kind of like a prophet who makes a false prediction – that made him a false prophet and a candidate for stoning. Did you know that 4,000 prophecies in that Bible have already come true down to the last detail? That leaves about 1,000 left to be fulfilled – those are the ones regarding the last days before the return of Christ, which are being checked off the list right now.

CARM's apologetic page #fundie carm.org


How many children did Abraham have,
one or two?
Genesis 22:2; Hebrews 11:17 and Galatians 4:22
1. One son
A. (Genesis 22:2) - "And He said, "Take now your son, your only son, whom you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah; and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I will tell you."
B. (Hebrews 11:17) - "By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac; and he who had received the promises was offering up his only begotten son."
2. Two sons
. (Galatians 4:22) - "For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the bondwoman and one by the free woman."
The answer to this apparent contradiction is found in understanding the typological representation of Isaac, Abraham's second born son, as a type of Christ. Abraham had Ishmael by the handmaiden Hagar. But Isaac was the child of promise, not Ishmael: "But God said to Abraham, "Do not be distressed because of the lad and your maid; whatever Sarah tells you, listen to her, for through Isaac your descendants shall be named,'" (Gen. 21:12).
If you look at the chart below, you will see the similarities between Isaac and Jesus. In other words, Isaac was a prophetic representation of Jesus. This is why Jesus said, "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad," (John 8:56). Abraham had, in a very real sense, seen the gospel presentation in the offering of his son, his "only begotten." So, we see here that the term "only begotten" is in reference to the unique son of God and Isaac was acting out the sacrifice of Christ, prophetically.

Jonathan Van Maren #fundie lifesitenews.com

Real people are being hurt by the left’s New Witch Hunt, and they don’t care

The eventful year of 2016 is over, and as the holiday season approaches and busy schedules perhaps allow a bit more time for some reading, I have an urgent recommendation for you: Get your hands on Mary Eberstadt’s short but powerful book It’s Dangerous to Believe: Religious Freedom and Its Enemies. It’s only 126 pages long—I read it in a few hours—but it lays out succinctly and with beautiful clarity what she calls the battle of the creeds, the war between the Sexual Revolution and traditionalist Christianity that has been waged with increasing sound and fury since the advent of the Pill.

When Eberstadt refers to the targeting of “Christians,” she is of course referring to traditionalist Christians—those who still hold to the two-thousand-year-old teachings on sexuality that Christians have always believed.

This is a distinction that is now necessary. The Sexual Revolution has managed to generate a contingent of religious quislings, “progressive” Christians who have more or less abolished notions of sexual sin but magnanimously want to keep a messiah around to forgive their neighbors of the sins of homophobia and judgementalism. But these Christians are a very new breed. This new “progressive” Christianity is not only less than a century old, but already shrinking—a recent report noted that it is conservative churches that are growing while liberal churches continue to empty out, putting a bit of irony in the claims of so-called progressive Christians that they are “on the right side of history.”

It is worth noting, for a moment, that if Christians with the traditionalist view of sexuality were placed on one side of a scale, and progressive Christians were plopped on the other side, the sheer lopsidedness of the scene would be rather hilarious. On one side, we have everyone from St. Paul to the great Christian martyrs, from Tolkien, Chesterton, and Lewis, to Jonathan Edwards, Augustine of Hippo, and even the liberal Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. On the other side, we have a handful of so-called progressive Christian intellectuals—and who can name any? —who have abandoned two thousand years of Christian teaching, announcing with staggering arrogance that everyone else was wrong. When the weight of history is dropped onto the scales, it lands on the traditionalist side with such force that such progressives are flung into the stratosphere.

But secular progressives and their post-Christian cronies have made such advances because the position of religion in society has been weakened so much in the first place. So-called progressive Christians are really just hybrid heretics, as they do not see themselves as abandoning Christianity, but rather attempting to reconcile our culture’s two warring creeds. To announce loud support for gay unions, the transgender agenda, abortion, and the other secular sacraments while attempting to twist into a theological pretzel that allows one to claim that such beliefs are actually an expression of “Christian love” may seem to be a solution to the problem of “picking a side,” but in reality it makes a mockery of everything Christianity has ever stood for and a fool of the one attempting this oil-and-water cocktail. This is why we often see “progressive” Christians turning on their supposed co-religionists with such fervor—they are virtue-signalling to their secular comrades, and displaying the fierce eagerness that collaborators so often do.

In Eberstadt’s view, there were two main events in recent history that weakened the standing of religion in society: The Catholic priest child abuse scandals and subsequent cover-ups, which dramatically decreased people’s trust in “organized religion,” and 9/11, which made many people feel as if religion was a dangerous and toxic set of beliefs that could, after all, inspire men to fly planes into buildings. The growing creed of secular progressivism responded with its own apostles in the form of the New Atheism movement, led by the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse”—Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Daniel Dennett. What was new about this atheist movement, it turns out, is that it sounded rather familiar—the child abuse scandal gave the evangelists of New Atheism fodder for all the moral fury and righteous indignation they needed for an anti-religion crusade. The New Atheists, with no sense of irony, began a moral panic: Religion poisons everything. (One of my friends and I used to joke that Hitchens did in fact believe in objective morality, he was simply offended that it predated him.)

This segued nicely into the ongoing demonization of Christians by the sexual revolutionaries. Christians were “homophobes,” “transphobes,” “bigots,” and “haters.” Consider for a moment, Eberstadt pleads with the reader, just how repulsive and ugly it is that millions of people are being convicted by smear campaigns of being hateful without evidence—their Christian beliefs alone are the only proof necessary to prove that they have hate in their heart. Hate, when detached from what any person actually feels, simply becomes a meaningless word. Eberstadt lays out, in careful detail, the absurd but stunning parallels between the ongoing stigmatization of Christians and the witch-hunts of 1600s Massachusetts. Secular progressivism, she reiterates, is a form of religion—and it sees the Christian view of sexuality as an original sin.

In other words, it is not that secular progressives don’t believe in the Devil. It’s just that they believe he happens to be a Christian. It’s not that they don’t believe in saints and sinners, it’s that in their creed, saints and sinners have swapped places: An athlete announcing his homosexuality can get a congratulatory call from the President of the United States, while a pastor renowned for his work combatting human trafficking can be forced to withdraw from offering a prayer at that same president’s inauguration as the result of a smear campaign targeting him for his Christian position on marriage.

Some may find the word “persecution” to be too strong a word to use in describing what is going on today in the West, and Eberstadt recognizes that. She does, however, detail very carefully the type of targeting that is going on: People losing their jobs, losing their businesses, being ostracized in social settings, refused admittance to universities, and finding their right to educate their own children under attack. Secular progressives are even targeting home-schooling while insinuating that Christian parents are a danger to their own children by virtue of the beliefs they teach. This fundamental right—the right of parents to pass their beliefs on to their children—is where most Christians, even those who simply wish to be left in peace, will finally draw the line and join the culture war.

Additionally, Eberstadt lays out the horrors of real, physical persecution that are being inflicted on Christians in Iraq—and asks, pointedly, why our secular progressive leaders do not seem to care. Indeed, there seems to be a backlash against the mere suggestion that Iraqi Christians, who like the Yazidis are often targeted for persecution by both ISIS and Muslims in the refugee camps, be prioritized because they are in the greatest danger. The reason vicious persecution the world round is ignored and escapes mention, while Barack Obama uses National Prayer Breakfasts to berate Christian leaders for historic sins, Eberstadt posits, is because those being persecuted are Christian, and secular progressives have no sympathy for Christians.

In the creed of the secular progressives, everything hinges on sex. Christians can believe, without controversy, that stealing, murder (except for abortion and euthanasia), lying, and swearing are wrong. If sex enters the picture, however, suddenly everything changes. It is for this reason that secular progressives are willing to hurt thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of poor and needy men, women, and children in order to inflict damage on Christian charities that do not agree with them that two men have the right to raise a child simply because they want to. Eberstadt records one heartbroken adoption worker noting that once the Catholic foster system and adoption services were “sued out of existence,” who would take care of the children? The progressive heresy hunters, of course, would have already carried their torches and pitchforks over to the next guilty charity and begun their shrieking anew. The message to Christian charities, lauded for decades even by secular sources for their sterling work with needy children and their mission to serve the poor, is simple: Change your beliefs on sex, or we’ll shut you down. Just as we see with abortion and so many of the other secular sacraments, children can always be sacrificed in the name of sex.

It is worth noting, as Eberstadt does, that this is not a theoretical question. Real people and real children are being hurt badly by this war against Christian charities, carried out by fanatics who would rather deny people life-saving services than agree to disagree on moral beliefs. If Christians are forced out of charity, much of the charitable system will implode, especially since religious people are far more likely to give to charity than secular people are. For example, people who pray every day are 30% more likely to give to a charity than people who do not pray, people who devote time to a spiritual life are 42% more likely to give to charity than those who do not, and interestingly, “people who say that ‘beliefs don’t matter as long as you’re a good person’ are dramatically less likely to give charitably (69% to 86%) and to volunteer (32% to 51%) than people who think that beliefs do matter.” Eberstadt’s chapter detailing the attack on Christian charities, titled “Inquisitors vs. good Works,” makes her book worth reading all by itself.

Eberstadt’s conclusion is a plea for common ground. Feminists and Christians, she points out, have found themselves fighting side by side on issues like pornography, surrogacy, and the objectification of women. It is possible for us to ascribe to the other the best possible motivation, while still disagreeing in the strongest possible terms. But for this to happen, says Eberstadt, the secular progressives must shut down their witch-hunt. They have to halt their demonization of Christians, cease their storming of Christian charities, and stop their attacks on Christian education. “Is the suppression of independent thought,” she asks, “really going to be progressivism’s historical signature?”

It certainly appears that way.

Students from University of Cape Town #fundie youtube.com

[Apologies if the dialogue was not transcribed properly, as they often speak quickly. A few phrases had to be omitted.]

Speaker in Yellow Sweater: Science as a whole is a product of western modernity; the whole thing should be scratched off, especially in Africa. So if you want practical solutions to decolonize science, we must restart science from an African perspective, from our perspective. For instance there's a place, and they believe that through the magic, the black magic, that you are able to send lightning to strike someone. So, can you explain that scientifically, because it's something that happens....

Audience Member: It's not true.

At this point, many in the audience start laughing.

Speaker in Gray: Sorry. Sorry.

Order is restored, everyone quiets down.

Speaker in Gray: Sorry, I need to address you directly. When we started this, we agreed on certain house rules.

Audience Member: Sorry.

Speaker in Gray: While you are doing that, you are disrespecting the sacredness of this space. And so, I'd like to ask you to first, please apologize.....

Audience Member: Sorry.

Speaker in Gray: to the panel directly, and number two, understand the rules that we went by in this space, because this is not an antagonizing space, and what you're trying to do is collapse the space and make it antagonizing, which we will not allow. This is a progressive space for people to say their opinions.

......

Speaker in Yellow: See, that very response is the reason I am not in the science faculty, I took science throughout my high school years, and there's a lot of things that I just, um, yeah. But Western modernity is the direct antagonistic factor to decolonization, because Western knowledge is totalizing. They say that it was Newton and only Newton who knew or saw an apple and then out of nowhere decided that gravity existed and created an equation and that is it. And whether people knew Newton or not and whatever happens in Western Africa or Northern Africa, that thing is the only way to explain gravity is through Newton who sat under a tree and saw an apple fall. So Western modernity is the problem that decolonization directly deals with, to say that we are going to decolonize by saying that we are going to be having knowledge that is produced by us that speaks to us and that is able to accommodate knowledge from our perspective. So if you're saying that you disagree with her approach, it means that you are vested in the Western and Eurocentric way of understanding which means you yourself still need to go back, internally, decolonize your mind, and say how can I relook at what I've been studying all these years, because Western knowledge is very pervasive to say the least....... So, decolonizing the sciences would mean doing away with it entirely and starting all over with how we respond to the environment and how we understand it. Thank you.

Frederica Mathewes-Green #fundie frederica.com

Let's Have More Teen Pregnancy

True Love Waits. Wait Training. Worth Waiting For. The slogans of teen abstinence programs reveal a basic fact of human nature: teens, sex, and waiting aren’t a natural combination.

Over the last fifty years the wait has gotten longer. In 1950, the average first-time bride was just over 20; in 1998 she was five years older, and her husband was pushing 27. If that June groom had launched into puberty at 12, he’d been waiting more than half his life.

If he had been waiting, that is. Sex is the sugar coating on the drive to reproduce, and that drive is nearly overwhelming. It’s supposed to be; it’s the survival engine of the human race. Fighting it means fighting a basic bodily instinct, akin to fighting thirst.

Yet despite the conflict between liberals and conservatives on nearly every topic available, this is one point on which they firmly agree: young people absolutely must not have children. Though they disagree on means—conservatives advocate abstinence, liberals favor contraception—they shake hands on that common goal. The younger generation must not produce a younger generation.

But teen pregnancy, in itself, is not such a bad thing. By the age of 18, a young woman’s body is well prepared for childbearing. Young men are equally qualified to do their part. Both may have better success at the enterprise than they would in later years, as some health risks—Cesarean section and Down syndrome, for example— increase with passing years. (The dangers we associate with teen pregnancy, on the other hand, are behavioral, not biological: drug use, STD’s, prior abortion, extreme youth, and lack of prenatal care.) A woman’s fertility has already begun to decline at 25—one reason the population-control crowd promotes delayed childbearing. Early childbearing also rewards a woman’s health with added protection against breast cancer.

Younger moms and dads are likely be more nimble at child-rearing as well, less apt to be exhausted by toddlers’ perpetual motion, less creaky-in-the-joints when it’s time to swing from the monkey bars. I suspect that younger parents will also be more patient with boys-will-be-boys rambunction, and less likely than weary 40-somethings to beg pediatricians for drugs to control supposed pathology. Humans are designed to reproduce in their teens, and they’re potentially very good at it. That’s why they want to so much.

Teen pregnancy is not the problem Unwed teen pregnancy is the problem. It’s childbearing outside marriage that causes all the trouble. Restore an environment that supports younger marriage, and you won’t have to fight biology for a decade or more.

Most of us blanch at the thought of our children marrying under the age of 25, much less under 20. The immediate reaction is: “They’re too immature.” We expect teenagers to be self-centered and impulsive, incapable of shouldering the responsibilities of adulthood.

But it wasn’t always that way; through much of history, teen marriage and childbearing was the norm. Most of us would find our family trees dotted with many teen marriages.

Of course, those were the days when grown teens were presumed to be truly “young adults.” It’s hard for us to imagine such a thing today. It’s not that young people are inherently incapable of responsibility-history disproves that-but that we no longer expect it. Only a few decades ago a high school diploma was taken as proof of adulthood, or at least as a promise that the skinny kid holding it was ready to start acting like one. Many a boy went from graduation to a world of daily labor that he would not leave until he was gray; many a girl began turning a corner of a small apartment into a nursery. Expectations may have been humble, but they were achievable, and many good families were formed this way.

Hidden in that scenario is an unstated presumption, that a young adult can earn enough to support a family. Over the course of history, the age of marriage has generally been bounded by puberty on the one hand, and the ability to support a family on the other. In good times, folks marry young; when prospects are poor, couples struggle and save toward their wedding day. A culture where men don’t marry until 27 would normally feature elements like repeated crop failures or economic depression.

That’s not the case in America today. Instead we have an artificial situation which causes marriage to be delayed. The age that a man, or woman, can earn a reasonable income has been steadily increasing as education has been dumbed down. The condition of basic employability that used to be demonstrated by a high school diploma now requires a Bachelor’s degree, and professional careers that used to be accessible with a Bachelor’s now require a Master’s degree or more. Years keep passing while kids keep trying to attain the credentials that adult earning requires.

Financial ability isn’t our only concern, however; we’re convinced that young people are simply incapable of adult responsibility. We expect that they will have poor control of their impulses, be self-centered and emotional, and be incapable of visualizing consequences. (It’s odd that kids thought to be too irresponsible for marriage are expected instead to practice heroic abstinence or diligent contraception.) The assumption of teen irresponsibility has broader roots that just our estimation of the nature of adolescence; it involves our very idea of the purpose of childhood.

Until a century or so ago, it was presumed that children were in training to be adults. From early years children helped keep the house or tend the family business or farm, assuming more responsibility each day. By their latter teens, children were ready to graduate to full adulthood, a status they received as an honor. How early this transition might begin is indicated by the number of traditional religious and social coming-of-age ceremonies that are administered at ages as young as 12 or 13.

But we no longer think of children as adults-in-progress. Childhood is no longer a training ground but a playground, and because we love our children and feel nostalgia for our own childhoods, we want them to be able to linger there as long as possible. We cultivate the idea of idyllic, carefree childhood, and as the years for education have stretched so have the bounds of that playground, so that we expect even “kids” in their mid-to-late twenties to avoid settling down. Again, it’s not that people that age couldn’t be responsible; their ancestors were. It’s that anyone, offered a chance to kick back and play, will generally seize the opportunity. If our culture assumed that 50-year-olds would take a year-long break from responsibility, have all their expenses paid by someone else, spend their time having fun and making forgivable mistakes, our malls would be overrun by middle-aged delinquents.

But don’t young marriages tend to end in divorce? If we communicate to young people that we think they’re inherently incompetent that will become a self-fulfilling prophecy, but it was not always the case. In fact, in the days when people married younger, divorce was much rarer. During the last half of the 20th century, as brides’ age rose from 20 to 25, the divorce rate doubled. The trend toward older, and presumptively more mature, couples didn’t result in stronger marriages. Marital durability has more to do with the expectations and support of surrounding society than with the partners’ age.

A pattern of late marriage may actually increase the rate of divorce. During that initial decade of physical adulthood, young people may not be getting married, but they’re still falling in love. They fall in love, and break up, and undergo terrible pain, but find that with time they get over it. They may do this many times. Gradually, they get used to it; they learn that they can give their hearts away, and take them back again; they learn to shield their hearts from access in the first place. They learn to approach a relationship with the goal of getting what they want, and keep their bags packed by the door. By the time they marry they may have had many opportunities to learn how to walk away from a promise. They’ve been training for divorce.

As we know too well, a social pattern of delayed marriage doesn’t mean delayed sex. In 1950, there were 14 births per thousand unmarried women; in 1998, the rate had leapt to 44. Even that astounding increase doesn’t tell the whole story. In 1950 the numbers of births generally corresponded to the numbers of pregnancies, but by 1998 we must add in many more unwed pregnancies that didn’t come to birth, but ended in abortion, as roughly one in four pregnancies do. My home city of Baltimore wins the blue ribbon for out-of-wedlock childbearing: in 2001, 77% of all births were to unwed mothers.

There are a number of interlocking reasons for this rise in unwed childbearing, but one factor must surely be that when the requirements presumed necessary for marriage rise too high, some people simply parachute out. It’s one thing to ask fidgety kids to abstain until they finish high school at 18. When the expectation instead is to wait until 25 or 27, many will decline to wait at all. We’re saddened, but no longer surprised, at girls having babies at the age of 12 or 13. Between 1940 and 1998, the rate at which girls 10-14 had their first babies almost doubled. These young moms’ sexual experiences are usually classified as “non-voluntary” or “not wanted.” Asking boys to wait until marriage is one way a healthy culture protects young girls.

The idea of returning to an era of young marriage still seems daunting, for good reason. It is not just a matter of tying the knot between dreamy-eyed 18-year-olds and tossing them out into world. Our ancestors were able to marry young because they were surrounded by a network of support enabling that step. Young people are not intrinsically incompetent, but they do still have lots of learning to do, just like newly-weds of any age. In generations past a young couple would be surrounded by family and friends who could guide and support them, not just in navigating the shoals of new marriage, but also in the practical skills of making a family work, keeping a budget, repairing a leaky roof, changing a leaky diaper.

It is not good for man to be alone; it’s not good for a young couple to be isolated, either. In this era of extended education, couples who marry young will likely do so before finishing college, and that will require some sacrifices. They can’t expect to “have it all.” Of the three factors—living on their own, having babies, and both partners going to school full-time—something is going to have to give. But young marriage can succeed, as it always has, with the support of family and friends.

I got married a week after college graduation, and both my husband and I immediately went to graduate school. We made ends meet by working as janitors in the evenings, mopping floors and cleaning toilets. We were far from home, but our church was our home, and through the kindness of more-experienced families we had many kinds of support—in fact, all that we needed. When our first child was born we were so flooded with diapers, clothes, and gifts that our only expense was the hospital bill.

Our daughter and older son also married and started families young. Things don’t come easy for those who buck the norm, but with the help of family, church, and creative college-to-work programs, both young families are making their way. Early marriage can’t happen in a vacuum; it requires support from many directions, and it would be foolish to pretend the costs aren’t high.

The rewards are high as well. It is wonderful to see our son and daughter blooming in strong, joyful marriages, and an unexpected joy to count a new daughter and son in our family circle. Our cup overflows with grandchildren as well: as of July we have four grandbabies, though the oldest is barely two. I’m 49.

It’s interesting to think about the future. What if the oldest grandbaby also marries young, and has his first child at the age of 20? I would hold my great-grandchild at 67. There could even follow a great-great-grand at 87. I will go into old age far from lonely. My children and their children would be grown up then too, and available to surround the younger generations with many resourceful minds and loving hearts. Even more outrageous things are possible: I come from a long-lived family, some of whom went on past the age of 100. How large a family might I live to see?

Such speculation becomes dizzying—yet these daydreams are not impossible, and surely not unprecedented. Closely-looped, mutually supporting generations must have been a common sight, in older days when young marriage was affirmed, and young people were allowed to do what comes naturally.

SolarSon #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Long time ago, hundreds of thousands of years ago or longer, mankind did not exist in physical form.

In fact we can go as far back in time that it goes beyond all of the physical creation.

God did NOT create the physical universe. People already existed BEFORE the physical universe. It would however be more correct to call the people of those times for "angels", in the sense that they were not physical, but spiritual beings.

There were even different "races" and "beings" in those times, it was "Good" and "Evil" as now, but not in the extreme form we can see today.

The Human race, were innocent back then, still good and pure at heart, mind and soul. They were playful, adventurous and exploring their existence.

People had an incredibly strong connection with each other, since they were pure spirit in form, and all was telepathic and empathic. They had never heard of "evil", never experienced it in any way, it was not part of their existence at all.

But, Evil DID exist, just in outer reaches of the Universe of that time - and in contrast with the Human race, that Evil race was completely opposite, much more so than the worst form of Evil we can see or experience here in this form today.

Back then, both those Good, the Human Race, and those Evil, for lack of good terms you can call them Reptilian since in effect, the ones called Reptilians on Earth now relate to these - they were both immortal in form, with eternal progress and development in state of individual awareness. No death, no birth, and no reincarnation.

The Human Race were a race of givers, of lovers. While the Reptilian race, were a race of takers, of destroyers.

Whereas the Human race would give each other what they needed and desired, the Reptilian would take it from each other - and anyone in their path.

At some point, as both the Human race and the Reptilian race were expanding their territories , they came across each other.

This was the turning point starting the downfall of Mankind - as the Human race now encountered a terror that was so great, that they had no preparations at all for what came. Evil of such proportions we can't even imagine it now - and the Human race of that time had never seen any form of Evil at all, they were pure good, and experienced Fear for the first time.

The Reptilians , coming over the Human race, were addicted. This may sound incredibly strange, but they did in fact get addicted on Human Souls - this because they consume the energy of the Souls.

Souls are basically the Food of the Reptilians, and they favor Souls of specific energy patterns or "tastes" so to speak. One such "taste" is that of Fear.

The consumption of Fear-filled Human Soul-energy gives a form of intoxicating rush and satisfaction to the ruthless Reptilians. This is why you often hear about Human sacrifices in the conspiracy-scene, and this is WHY such occurs in physical form in our days , it dates all the way back to those original events.

This is also the reason for the extremely negative state of the world, with so much famine, wars, violence, terror, etc - the world is kept alive, in physical form, to feed the hunger of the Reptilian controllers. They lust for the Human Soul-energy, and they lust for Power.

And what happened back in the time they first encountered each other, the Reptilians and Humans, was that the Reptilians gained utter control and enslavement over the Human race, which had no way at all to defend itself, they had never had any reason to defend themselves.

The time before this, can be connected to "the Garden of Ede" of the Bible. It was all pure bliss and love and harmony back then.

So let me fast forward a bit since it is too time demanding to go into all the details -

Eventually the contact between the Reptilian race and the Human race resulted in something more, a completely new experience for both races. This was an unexpected "side-effect" of these two different forms coming together, metaphysically speaking.

What happened was the materialization and spawning of the physical. This was caused by the mixed spiritual energies of the two opposites, the Reptilian race and Human race.

The Reptilian race, who were and still are very intelligent, took advantage of this discovery to create new denser levels of existence within the Sphere of Existence they were already living in at the time, along with the Humans.

With this they found a new way to further enslave the Humans, who had started to rebel at this time and fighting against the Reptilians. The Humans did not longer let themselves be oppressed as they had been for so long.

The Reptilian race created, by manifestation, a whole new Universe of physical matter, one that they could rule and be in charge of completely. They created worlds, planets, rules, laws, their full own system.

And having figured out the nature of the Human race, they knew how to persuade the Human race so they could gain more control over them. They understood that Humans wanted to be free, individual and their own Masters. Thus they created a World for in which to live the Human race, at least the ones they could lure into their own creation.

They created a World that was beautiful enough, one that was attractive, peaceful and tempting. They created all the physical, and the systems on how the physical life played out, and laid it out in such a way that the Human Bodies they created could support the consciousness of the Human Souls and thus function as a vehicle for the Human consciousness to exist within.

Doing that, they had set up a perfect place for their prisoners, their slaves. And now they put into action a new plan, which was to stage an escape of the Human race from the Reptilian capturers.

Of course, the Humans did not "escape" - they simply moves down into an even tighter controlled "concentration camp", called Earth.

Since the Reptilians were in control of their own design, the Human Bodies, they now had a very effective way of controlling the Human race that shifted their consciousness into the Human Bodies. As I mentioned earlier, this includes the spiritual aspects of the Human body such as the Third Eye, the "remote controlled Mind Control system" so to speak.

It also includes the laws of Reincarnation and Karma, which also were created by the Reptilian race to control the captured Humans.

The Physical brain of the Human Body was also designed in a way to make it easy to control. As an example, it was made so that it is easy to put into a trance, Hypnosis exists because of this Reptilian implement in the physical brain. Hypnosis is simply a way to quickly and easily control a Human (or many at the same time) without even the need of a direct spiritual-mental influence through the Third Eye.

As mentioned earlier, further Mind Control and Brainwashing techniques were implemented in the Reincarnation process, as they made sure to create humans to only live a few years at a time so they never could properly progress or come to know themselves before they would die and be "reset".

And we can see the result of how effective their methods are, considering people are still here on Earth, life-time after life-time, since the dawn of those times

There is much more to tell, about all the time that passed between "now", and "then" - the very beginnings of physical incarnation on Earth, and I will try detail that a bit more later, but I will also get more into real practical things on how to better get back into OWN control of Life, Destiny, Death & After.

Dola Indidis #fundie jpost.com

A Kenyan lawyer has filed a petition with the International Court of Justice in The Hague, suggesting that the trial and crucifixion of Jesus Christ was unlawful, and the State of Israel among others should be held responsible, Kenyan news outlet the Nairobian reported on Friday.

Dola Indidis, a lawyer and former spokesman of the Kenyan Judiciary is reportedly attempting to sue Tiberius (emperor of Rome, 42 BCE-37 CE), Pontius Pilate, a selection of Jewish elders, King Herod, the Republic of Italy and the State of Israel.

“Evidence today is on record in the Bible, and you cannot discredit the Bible,” Indidis told the Kenyan Citizen News.

Although those he suggests should have been convicted during the original trial have not been alive for more than 2,000 years, Indidis insists that the government for whom they acted can and should still be held responsible.

“I filed the case because it’s my duty to uphold the dignity of Jesus and I have gone to the ICJ to seek justice for the man from Nazareth,” Indidis told the Nairobian. “His selective and malicious prosecution violated his human rights through judicial misconduct, abuse of office bias and prejudice.”

Indidis apparently named the states of Italy and Israel in the lawsuit because upon the attainment of independence, the two states incorporated the laws of the Roman Empire, those in force at the time of the crucifixion.

He is challenging the mode of questioning used during Jesus’s trial, prosecution, hearing and sentencing; the form of punishment meted out to him while undergoing judicial proceedings and the substance of the information used to convict him.

The case was first filed in the High Court in Nairobi but was rejected. Indidis then applied to have it heard at the ICJ.

Indidis says he wants to establish what crime Jesus was charged with and prays that the court decides “that the proceedings before the Roman courts were a nullity in law, for they did not conform to the rule of law at the material time and any time thereafter.”

“Some of those present spat in his face, struck him with their fists, slapped him, taunted him, and pronounced him worthy of death,” Indidis told the Kenyan news website Standard Media (SDE).

When Jesus died, Indidis insists, he was not given an opportunity to be heard.

“I am suing as a friend,” he said.

Indidis insisted on the validity of his case, saying “I know with a matter of fact and truth we have a good case with a high probability of success and I hope it is done in my lifetime.”

When asked about the case, an official from the ICJ told legal news website Legal Cheek, “The ICJ has no jurisdiction for such a case. The ICJ settles disputes between states. It is not even theoretically possible for us to consider this case.”

VileGeneticTrash #sexist incels.co

You guys need to seriously view women below men, if you haven't already.

I see it in the misogyny posts, but in other posts you inadvertently reveal your lack of sincerity through feelings of inferiority to women. Please understand that we are right. Women are not on the same plane of existence of men. They are below us. Inferior.

As Dawkins would say women are "survival machines - robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes." They are designed to reproduce with the most attractive or dominant man to maximize the replication and survival of their genetic material. Men have the same genetic programming but most men have the ability to reach higher states of consciousness that go outside this primitive dance. I'm talking about shamans, monks, the dali lama, witch doctors, gnostics, etc etc. Women don't have this same capability and there is no major religion that has allowed women to take part in their ceremonies.

The jews say a prayer every morning that goes

"Blessed are you, Hashem, King of the Universe, for not having made me a Gentile."

"Blessed are you, Hashem, King of the Universe, for not having made me a slave."

Blessed are you, Hashem, King of the Universe, for not having made me a woman."

baphomet #fundie christiandiscussionforums.org

If an angel was in a UFO that led the astrologers (the 'wise men') to the young child Jesus in that house (Mt 2:11), then it must have been a wicked angel. How so? We have these pagan astrologers (Greek, "magoi"; see De 18:10-12 and Isa 47:13,14) traveling along and they see a "star". (how convenient; astrologers.....stars.....) Does it lead them directly to Jesus? Nope. They next end up in front of the wicked King Herod in Jerusalem. (Mt 2:1,2) Herod lies to the astrologers and tells them to go find the Christ and report back to him so he can worship him also. (Mt 2:8) His real intention was to kill Jesus. (Mt 2:13) Now an assassination plot has been assembled and the astrologers are the dupes in this scheme. So the astrologers start to travel and see the "star" again. This time it leads them to Bethlehem and to not a baby, but the young child Jesus in his house. (Mt 2:9) After they pay their homage to Jesus, the astrologers are ready to head back to Jerusalem to report to Herod as instructed. So up to this point, following the "star" has just about got Jesus killed! How is God going to stop it? He warns them in a dream not to go back to Herod. (Mt 2:12) So who was using the "star" to help carry out an evil assassination plot? Who else, but the manslayer and opposer of God, Satan the Devil. Thus the next time you see a 'star' on top of a Christmas tree, remember that it represents a wicked angel who was determined to have Jesus, the Son of God, killed.

Pomidor Quixote and Mr Justice Hayden #sexist #wingnut dailystormer.name

[From "British Judge Says Sex With Wife is a “Fundamental Human Right” and Everyone Loses Their Minds"]

The Jewish media puts sex everywhere to make people think about it constantly, but the Jews also make heterosexual sex much more difficult to achieve by introducing convoluted ideas about “consent” and about what marriage is supposed to be.

One man is taking a stand against that bullshit. This judge is bringing old ideas and common sense back into the discussion about the role of marriage in our society, and he’s doing all of that by… saying that a husband should be able to have sex with his wife.

RT wrote:

A British judge has invoked the ire of online commentators, activists and politicians after remarking that it was a man’s “fundamental human right” to have sex with his wife during an already controversial court case.

I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife… I think he is entitled to have it properly argued,” senior High Court judge Justice Hayden was quoted as saying during a preliminary hearing on a case involving a married couple of 20 years.

The wife has learning difficulties and her condition is deteriorating, prompting social services to raise the alarm about the potential for sexual abuse in the relationship as they felt the woman was no longer able to make decisions about whether she consented to sexual relations. Social services ultimately brought the case to the Court of Protection in London.

The husband has pledged to no longer sleep with his wife but prosecuting lawyers are still pushing for a court order barring sexual relations to prevent the woman from being raped.

Let’s get something out of the way first: all women have learning difficulties. It’s just a matter of how severe those difficulties are.

That said, if she can say yes or no to a question such as “do you want some ice cream?” or “do you feel like watching a movie?” then she can absolutely consent to sex.

This whole “consent” thing is a retarded Jewish invention that overcomplicates basic male-female interaction. If a woman doesn’t want to have sex, she resists, if she wants to stop having sex while having sex, she makes it known. If she for some reason decides to pretend to be okay with having sex while not feeling like having sex, then that’s her problem. Literally something that happens in her mind that can’t be measured or proven.

The insanity of this story is augmented by the fact that even though the poor husband pledged to no longer sleep with his wife, prosecutors still push for a court order to officially make him unable to have sex with his wife.

Do you understand how insane that is?

If a man can’t have sex with his wife, why does he have a wife?

[...]

The idea about marriage that most people have in their subconscious was put there by tales of old, by their grandfathers, and by the Jewish social-engineering media machine.

If marriage doesn’t ask anything from women, and gives them half of your stuff or more whenever they please, it not only does nothing to stop relationships from breaking down but it actually provides incentives for relationships to break down.

These whores will destroy your life if you let them.

The moment they feel they’ve secured you, that you have no alternative front-hole, and that you’re socially and legally prohibited from looking for their replacement… that’s the moment they’ll decide to stop having sex with you. Sex will become less and less frequent. She’ll never be “in the mood,” she’ll always be tired or with headache. She’ll never treat you the same. She’ll look at you with disdain. She’ll resent you. She’ll feel trapped by you even though you’re the one that’s really trapped. She’ll feel you’re abusive even though she’s the one being abusive.

She’ll file for divorce and she’ll take as much from you as she possibly can, and then she’ll tell everyone you know about how terrible you are. She’ll go fuck some loser that can’t compare to you but that will have more than you because she’ll share the stuff she took from you with him, and they’ll laugh at you every time you go get your kids on the weekends.

Your kids won’t understand why daddy looks so poor now while mommy and her new boyfriend seem so well off. You’ll want to explain to them… but you won’t be able to. You wouldn’t even know where to start.

As time passes, you’ll see how your own kids prefer mommy’s boyfriend. They’ll tell you how funny he is, how many great things they do together, and how much time they spend together. Every time you send them back to her house… you’ll feel like a shadow. An empty human husk trapping the echoes of the man that you once were and mixing them with the cries of the man that you wanted to be.

All because you thought marriage meant something other than your doom.

pothed16 #fundie answers.yahoo.com

I guess there really isn't freedom of religion in America anymore, Now it is freedom of Choice?
Edit
Update: if they can actually edit an ancient book like the king James Bible than something is very wrong.
Update 2: doesn't freedom of religion mean that your free to attend any church? why have they told me numerous times to leave for no reason, escorted by the police?
Update 3: and put in Jail?
Update 4: America kinda of even looks really kind of fake now without Freedom of Religion
Update 5: and the people sound like they have absolutely no- kindness or affection
Update 6: you have the freedom to choose i guess whatever you wanna do. So whatever go around and murder people on the streets if you want to and the cops can't put you in Jail. Be my Guest
Update 7: the goverment is trying to kill everyone anyway
Update 8: what is Religion of Freedom? the cops told me that when i told them i have the freedom of religion? and they told me i should start my own church
Update 9: i guess maybe the police said that in america you can only practice my religion. and freechristianpublishing.com won't publish it. and i don't have 3,000 dollars
Update 10: i just kind of want to be left alone anyway.
Update 11: Maybe the police want america to be full of hobos
Update 12: america does actually look like it's supposed to be a Hobo paradise

EnglishVids #crackpot #dunning-kruger #fundie boards.christogenea.org

[From "100 Proofs the Israelite's Were White"]

The America Flag's 13 stripes are the 13 tribes of Israel

Before Israel even conquered the lands of Canaan it was already prophesied that one day Israel would have a new land. It would seem that God never intended it to be a permanent dwelling.

This new land is none other than America where the scattered lost tribes abroad finally regathered all together from Europe as one nation. Which overtime became the single greatest most prosperous nation ever to exist on earth.

Although Jacob (Israel) originally only had 12 sons, which later became the 12 tribes of Israel, we must remember that Joseph the 11th son, received a double portion and passed this inheritance onto his own two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh. Jacob made them his own sons and blessed them, thus making it a total of 13 tribes.

All Apostles have Traditional English names

Were the Apostles called Tyrone or Jasmin? How about Abu or Wang? No!

The names you commonly see over and over again are John, James, Matthew, Mary, Simon, Peter, Paul and so forth. The Apostles had traditional White names which carried on throughout Europe, to Britain and America over the centuries.

This is because the Apostles were White! Jesus was White and all Israel has always been white.

European Pagan God's derive from the Old Testament

As the Israelite's dispersed into Europe you'd expect to be able to trace a lot of their Pagan believes back to the original teachings of the Old Testament. Many European Pagan religions have the enemy being a Great Serpent. Along with evil Giants.

If you understand that the Serpent is not a literal serpent but simply all the evil races the descendants of Cain and the Genesis 6 corruptions, all together as a figurative Serpent. Whilst the Giants appeared amongst them, such as in the lands of Caanan. You can see it's the same story as the Bible, it's the same people the Israelites passing on there oral traditions

Wodin, or Odin It's clear that is a derivation of the Hebrew Adon, which means Lord. Our people always had a problem of deifiing ancient Kings. Odin was a king who led the Germanic tribes into Europe. He was just a man he existed.

Loki It's clear that is a derivation of Lucifer. Originally the C was hard so Luckifer or Lucky/Loki for short. In others Satan the father of the evil races, the head of the Great Serpent

In the end times a great battle Ragnarok would take place where the son of God, sometimes called Thor who return and we would all rise up together and fight this evil serpent race together.

Is that not exactly what the Bible teaches, Christ returning to save his people in the Armageddon. There are many more similirities. It all shows the Germanic tribes were the dispered Israelites and they were white.

David Barton #fundie wnd.com

In 1945, George Orwell penned “Animal Farm.” One of his characters was Squealer the pig, who arbitrarily redefined words so that they would mean what he wanted. As Orwell explained about Squealer, “he could turn black into white” as part of his attempt to get the other animals to accept his message. It appears that secular progressives are the modern Squealer.

According to them, Donald Trump has now shown us who he really is: a theocrat. Never mind that leading up to the election, we were all fed a steady diet of how irreligious he was. That doesn’t matter anymore. Now he’s a theocrat!

Ironically, they don’t even call the pope a theocrat, and especially not their Shariah supremacist friends seeking to install a global caliphate. The term “theocrat!” is so repulsive that it is reserved solely for Donald Trump and those who support him.

They are so repulsed by traditional religion that they exploded in derision after first lady Melania Trump recited the Lord’s Prayer at a rally in Florida. And then when a public meeting in Louisiana was opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, the invocation was repeatedly interrupted with vocal outbursts and heckling. All of this was nauseating to them, but then – horror of horrors! – Trump promised to restore constitutional protections for the rights of religious conscience and to level the political playing field to allow people of faith to have the same constitutional free-speech rights secular folks have. That announcement was so terrifying it caused a Washington Post columnist to warn the nation that “Much-dreaded ‘Shariah law,’ or something resembling it, may well be coming to the United States.” Wow.

Let’s see if I get this right: If you want to restore the constitutional free-speech rights of all citizens, including pastors (rights unconstitutionally removed by Sen. Lyndon Baines Johnson in 1954), and if you want to protect the constitutional rights of religious conscience (which, historically speaking, is America’s first-protected, most-important and longest-cherished politically protected right), then you are establishing a “theocracy”?

To quote a famous line from Inigo Montoya in the popular movie “Princess Bride:” “You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.”

I understand that it might be difficult for secular progressives to know the meaning of a word as simple as “theocracy.” Most of them probably went first to public school and then attended an “elite” academic college afterward, and study after study affirms that most of those who attend such institutions no longer receive even a rudimentary knowledge of basic historical facts (and they certainly don’t get much logic or common sense).

So just for clarity, here’s the simple definition of “theocracy”:

“A system of government in which priests rule in the name of God, or a god.” (Oxford Dictionary)

“A form of government [with] the God’s or deity’s laws being interpreted by the ecclesiastical authorities.” “A system of government by priests claiming a divine commission.” (dictionary.com)

“Government ruled by … religious authority.” (American Heritage Dictionary)

Do they really believe that Trump is a priest, or an ecclesiastical authority? How silly! And a theocracy also uses coercion and force to enforce its beliefs and dogmas. Furthermore, it excludes input from the people – no elections. So by definition, a constitutional republic with open elections, such as America has, cannot be a theocracy (but let’s not confuse them with something so simple).

However, there is one other important fact secular progressives ignore: Just as religion can be the basis of a theocracy, according to the U.S. Supreme Court, so, too, can non-religion. Back in 1965, the court held (and reiterated many times since) that all that is required to be a “religion” is “whether a given belief that is sincere and meaningful occupies a place in the life of its possessor parallel to that filled by the orthodox belief in God.” The court has therefore repeatedly ruled that progressives, humanists, Satanists, atheists, evolutionists and other such secularist groups are just as religious as Bible-based groups, and so each of these secularist groups now receives the same religious tax-deductible standing as traditional religious groups.

So, if what Trump believes can represent a theocracy, so, too, can what secular progressives believe. In fact, secular progressives are more likely to be truly theocratic, for they regularly exercise coercion to force dissenters to adopt their beliefs. If you doubt this, just ask the bakers, florists, photographers, clerks, chaplains and others who have tried to avoid participating in the progressives’ religious rites to their great goddess of the Sexual Revolution, whether abortion, homosexuality, transgenderism, or other manifestations of the LGBT agenda. (Significantly, Romans 2:21-23 in the Bible points out that critics are often guilty of the very crimes and shortcomings they accuse others of. That certainly appears to be so in this case.)

So how does the charge of “theocracy!” relate to what Trump and his administration is doing? It doesn’t – unless you are Squealer the pig.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

Before Lilibet was crowned in 1953, 3 kings were eliminated to make way for her enthronement. King George V was given the poison cup; King Edward VIII was forced to abdicate, and King George VI was also given the poison cup.

King George V was a grandson of Queen Victoria and the second son of King Edward VII.

He was king during the terrible conflict called World War I and he was king when the Twins were born.

Prince George married Mary of Teck in 1893 and the couple had 6 children: Edward, Albert, Mary, Henry, George, and John.

Bertrand Edward Dawson, 1st Viscount Dawson of Penn, was the physician to the royal family and president of the Royal College of Physicians. He was responsible for the timely demise of King George V.

The DOCTOR is the most important person in a republic or a monarchy because he/she holds the power of life and death over the ruler.

On the night of January 20, 1936, Dr. Dawson gave the king 2 lethal injections so that the announcement of his death would be timed for inclusion in The Times of January 21.

Dawson did not want the announcement to appear first in the "plebeian" Evening Standard.

The funeral of King George V took place on January 28 and he was interred at Windsor Castle.

The reason for his action, which Dawson frankly admits in his diary, was to ensure that the announcement of the king's death should appear first in the morning edition of The Times and not in some lesser publication later in the day. To make doubly sure that this would happen Dawson telephoned his wife in London asking her to let The Times know when the announcement was imminent.

There was a little doggerel verse that was very popular back then:

Lord Dawson of Penn/ Killed many men./ That's why we sing/ 'God Save the King'.

After the timely demise of King George V, Edward, the Prince of Wales, was next in line to the throne.

1936 was the year of the 3 kings!!

1936 was indeed a fateful year for the British Empire because it was the year of the 3 kings. People are familiar with the tale of the 3 kings from the Christmas story but it was nothing like that.

In 1936, the new king of the British Empire, Edward VIII, abdicated his throne to marry Wallis Simpson–the MAN he loved.

Wallis lost nothing by the king's abdication because she/he was a "queen" already!!

When the Duchess was asked why she/he didn't have children, her reply was that "the Duke is not heir conditioned."

At precisely 10 p.m. on December 10, 1936, King Edward made his famous abdication speech. The 42-year-old king was the most eligible bachelor in the world and could have chosen any woman to be his queen.

The king told the British people via radio that he could not continue to be king without the "woman" he loved.

In reality, the 40-year-old Simpson could not pass the sex check examination to determine if she/he could produce heirs to the throne.

The king's abdication speech was broadcast via radio to the 4 corners of the flat earth.

Immediately after the abdication, the king settled his affairs in England and departed for Austria on the destroyer HMS Fury. From now on he would be known as His Royal Highness, the Duke of Windsor.

Albert, Duke of York, was next in line to the throne. He never dreamed that he would be king because he had serious mental and physical disabilities. He also had a very bad stutter and dreaded any kind of public speaking.

King George VI was the World War II king.

According to Marion Crawford, the Twins' governess, he liked to spend his evenings doing NEEDLEWORK!!

How could a man like that stand up to Churchill and Hitler?

Queen Elizabeth was the wife of King George and the mother of the Twins.

Here is a quote from a memoir of the Twins' governess:

The Duke and Duchess rarely dined out. At evening, the happy bath hour over, the children bedded and the day's work done, they would sit one on each side of the fireplace like any other young married couple, happy in each other, not requiring any outside diversion. The Duke was astonishingly expert with a needle. He once made a dozen chair covers in petit point for Royal Lodge. I remember he got rather tired of filling in the background, so I obliged and let him go on with the more amusing part of the design. (Crawford, The Little Princesses, p. 45).

Imagine Winston "Bulldog" Churchill walking in on him doing petit point in Buckingham Palace.

The last photo of King George VI was taken at Heathrow Airport on January 31.

The King was feeling fine and spent the next week hunting at Sandringham.

Here is a quote from an authorized biography of the Twins:

He died, suddenly and without warning, of a thrombosis in his sleep at Sandringham, just six days later, in the early hours of 6 February 1952. His daughter became Queen in Kenya as she sat on the platform of the Treetops Hotel in the branches of a giant wild fig tree watching and photographing the animals at the salt-lick. (Bradford, Elizabeth, p. 165).

Sir John Weir was the personal physician to several monarchs. He was the man most likely to prepare the poison cup for the king.

Sir John Weir was personal physician to the king and ideally situated to prepare the poison cup.

Sir Harold Campbell was the king's equerry and ideally situated to present the poison cup.

Lilibet was totally prepared for that event because her private secretary had the accession papers with him in South Africa.

Lilibet was expecting the timely death of the king and she never shed a single tear:

Queen Elizabeth's response to her father's death was remarkably controlled. When Martin Charteris reached Sagan Lodge on 6 February 1952 to start discussing the practicalities of accession, he found the couple alone together, with Philip lying back on the sofa, holding The Times over his face as a shield. The new queen's cheeks were a little flushed, but there was no sign of tears (Lacey, Monarch: The Life and Reign of Elizabeth II, p. 173).

After the customary year of "mourning" the king's death, Lilibet was crowned as Queen Elizabeth II on June 2, 1953.

The coronation of 25-year-old Lilibet took place in Westminster Abbey on June 2, 1953.

Initially, the BBC was banned from filming the ceremony but that ban was lifted when they agreed that there would be no close-up filming.

Thanks to the communications revolution, the wedding was broadcast live via TV to the 4 corners of the flat earth.

Over 8,000 guests from all over the Empire attended the ceremony. General George Marshall, the U.S. Secretary of State who implemented the Marshall plan, represented the United States. The coronation was the first major international event to be broadcast live on television.