Similar posts

Oscarboy3333 #sexist reddit.com

How I went from a Women hating Incel into a reformed Feminist thanks to my girlfriend.

Hey everyone,

I was an Incel like you, spent countless hours a day hating on women for no apparent reason. Now I look back, i'm ashamed of my previous actions. How did it change ?

One day a stranger inboxed me here on reddit, wanted to question my lifestyle, found out she was a "foid"(very disrespectful), she invited me for a coffee. I accepted and my life completely changed for the better.

She helped me realize what an entitled, piece of shit men are and how ashamed I should be. She helped me realize my ethnicity(Indian) is bottom of the barrel, backward that oppresses women, made me apologize to 1000 random women on Instagram on behalf of my ethnicity, I couldn’t copy paste, I had to re-write each time.. She went through the pics of all my crushes from middle school to high school and helped me realize my crushes didn't owe their body to me, and it was actually inappropriate that that some of them found out about it and helped me realize what kind of trauma they would have faced by someone like me having crush on them.

Since I was hard wired into being a piece of shit that hated women and oppressed them, she had to use harsh punishment to rewire the correct way. For example, we walked into the starbucks I worked in, I forgot to hold the door, so she made me kneel down in front of everyone at starbucks and face slap me and yell “I RESPECT WOMEN AND IM ASHAMED TO BE A MAN”.

I once saw her flirt with another dude, when I questioned her she helped me realized that women should not be oppressed, but again I was being a piece of shit so that means the punishment was going to be harsher. She tied me up naked, and beat my testicles hard for 20 minutes straight with a wooden spoon. I was in pain, I cried so much that I stopped producing tears. But that was absolutely necessary for my rewiring.

I caught her another time on Tinder, I confronted but instead of punishing me, she asked to join them on a threesome. We never had sex yet, just a kiss on the cheek. Before the intercourse began she had a little game and told me and Brad had to wrestle each other and only the winner gets to have sex with her. She wanted to see me if I can protect her in case of danger. Brad is about 6,5, muscular built. He put me on headlock and started choking me, my GF however was encouraging and motivating. She kept cheering “Die you fucking incel, I want you to fucking die right now with your mouth open, then I’ll cut your dick and shove it in your mouth and post it on Facebook and tag your mom”. It was encouraging but I knocked out and woke up with heavy feeling in my chest. As I woke up, I realize my GF was on top of me and Brad was on top of her having intercourse. Haha I guess since I lost, I’m still a virgin. The highlight of the night came when she wanted to get comfortable having Anal Sex, she attempted in the past but didn’t work, so she needed me to hold her hand, be therefore her and comfort as Brad is going in. I really teared up when Brad fully went inside her Anus while she was in tear of joy and pleasure. That was the first time I ever shed tears in joy.

Past weekend, she wanted to help me teach how women feel when they are obligated to perform Oral on guys. I was dressed up as a female, wore make up, lipstick and she guided me into performing proper Oral on Brad. It was tough but I'm not an ignorant asshole that is homophobic. Therefore I tried to enjoy my time, I choked, gagged and when Brad came I was ordered to keep his cum inside my mouth for 5 minutes before told to swallow it. I never knew Cum was warm and metalic. It was absolutely necessary for me to go through that to be a full on man in this world.

Guys, give up this women hating subreddit, please find a gf, respect woman and live a better life. and Stop being an INCEL hahahaha.

Saudade #sexist incels.co

RE: [Blackpill] [Slavpill] Russia among has the highest rates of abortion in the world

Ukraine and Belarus are aslo at the top of the list

Extra degenerate slav foids are too busy riding a non-slavic man's massive thundercock that they are forget about contraceptions.People should stop seeing slavic foids as goddesses

Serbia too. Slavic countries are extremely matriarchal and feminist since times of communism. I actually go around foids forums and i look up the reasons why they kill their kids and its comical, they always say how they are good persons because she wouldn't have afforded a baby branded clothes or vacations every year (richest county in Serbia has lowest birth rate), she is busy with studying some useless shit, she is too young in her 20s to have a kid, world is overpopulated, i want child free life, some are already on their third of fourth abortions, some are so deluded they still call themselves Christian and they pray in Church before abortion and thank God that it all finished well and they know God will forgive them because she wasnt ready for a kid (LOL). Then the first thing they ask is can i have sex immediately after abortion or can i have kids in future (they wanna pop one kid in late 30s so it can take care of her when she gets old). Reality is that they are extremely materialistic, hedonistic and nihilistic and they see children as burden and investment that threatens their commodity and cock carousel, but they still want to push this bullshit about how noble they were for ending a life of a baby that would "suffer" because it would wear cheap clothes and have Chinese smartphone instead of Iphone, when they eventually pop one kid then they will act as greatest and most conservative mother ever ignoring their abortion counts. They are extremely uneducated about their bodies or anatomy, only 20% use protection, they also have tendencies to blame everything on men ignoring that they chose those same men, they all want to "experience life" aka party and ride cock carousels and then they want to be mothers in mid 30s (seriously i barely see any women in 20s with kids) but most of them cant find partners anymore due to low fertility and old age. If someone suggests that maybe you should watch with whom you sleep or dont be promiscuous or use protection then they will say that you are close minded, religious and patriarchal fanatic, backwards nut, my body my choice etc, they also get offended or insulted when Chadimir asks them about sex count or abortions count (past is past teehee). 16 year old girl can abort legally and parents will never know, doctors tell women here to hide their abortions from parents or partners so they can pretend to be religious and innocent until they lock up some naive betabuxxer. Mini lifefuel is that most of those foids when i read say that they cant forgive themselves for what they did, they want to go back in time and stop it, they cry when they see pregnant women and babies in public, they have nightmares, they become extremely depressed and suicidal, some become infertile, some start giving many births to compensate, some take radical feminist stances to hide their sorrow etc. By raw statistics on average every woman in this country aborted 3 times during her lifetime, and in same time people here are trying to present this shithole as "conservative", "traditional", "Christian" etc, 84% of people here declare themselves as """"""""Christian""""""""" which is laughable and insulting to real followers.

Royce E. Van Blaricome #fundie disqus.com

Jenny Ondioline:
It's a curious thing about you, Royce. With everyone who disagrees with you, you thank them over and over for things they neither said nor did, and you do it over and over which is dishonest on a huge level and we know what your God has to say about bearing false witness. Has He given you permission to lie so wantonly?

My statement was "At the end of the day consenting adults means consenting adults. That doesn't mean I support incest." This you find contradictory. How is it contradictory? I DON'T support incest, but you seem to think my disapproval isn't enough, that I need to be waving placards around and writing letters of complaint or something. Consenting adults, by which I mean adults and not 13-year olds, are free to do as they like as long as no one's being abused against their will.

Please don't compare the Jews of the Holocaust with my refusal to get in the faces of people who practice incest. If I saw enough incest going on in this world to make noise about it we might have more to talk about, but I don't know of anyone who practices it. OK?

"Get off this Christian page and STOP TROLLING!!!"
How about acting more like a Christian, Royce? And I'm not trolling. I have a right to disagree with you when you say something I consider ridiculous. And I don't believe in Satan so no, you'll just have to get used to the idea that I'm not going to introduce any supernatural elements to this discussion.

And the rest is more proselytizing and threats of a hellfire I don't believe in, so we'll leave it at that.

Reply from Royce E. Van Blaricome:
Tell ya what, why don't you count up the number of "Likes" and see who has more folks disagreeing with who. Oh, and look up the word "everyone" in the Dictionary too Troll. And ya might as well look up "honesty" while you're at it because ya ain't gotta clue what that is either.

Your statements are right there for all to see. You do support incest by your own words. And, while you think you don't, it just goes to show how deluded you are but that's to be expected by someone who has no clue what they believe or why.

"Consenting adults, by which I mean adults and not 13-year olds"
But that's the LAW in some states and you said you support the LAW. You really are mixed up! I understand though. It's hard to keep your story straight when you have no moral compass. And you still haven't given an answer for why it's ok if it's 16, or 13, or 10 or no age at all - so long as it's the LAW.

"How about acting more like a Christian, Royce?"
How many times do we have to cover the same ground? YOU have NO clue what a Christian is! So I'll take that with the due consideration it deserves. Here, how about this: You wicked viper that is just like a white-washed sepulcher full of dead men's bones. Wanna take a guess who said that?

You ARE trolling.

And frankly, it doesn't really matter whether or not you believe in Satan or not. You belong to him. Just like it doesn't matter if you believe in the Lake of Fire or not because you'll be spending ALL Eternity in the Lake of Fire with him.

"But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” (Rev 21:8)

Paddy Singh #racist antisemitism.uk

Captain Paddy Singh, UKIP’s candidate for the Wiltshire North constituency in the upcoming General Election, has tweeted a series of shocking antisemitic comments with repeated references to “Nazi Jews” and comparing Israeli policy to the Nazis. Captain Singh also stood for UKIP in the recent Wiltshire Council Election. In one, he mused: “At times I ask myself were the Nazis right in herding the Jews into concentration camps.”

The appalling antisemitic tweets were discovered on the Twitter account he operates for his travel agency, Hindoostan Tours, between 2014 and 2015. The tweets include:

On 20th July 2014: “The Israelis are basically Nazis in mentality. The survivors of the tragic Holacast [sic] learnt from their captors.”

On 30th July 2014: “No hope of a ceasefire with the Nazi Jews like wild dogs on the rampage.”

On 1st August 2014: “Israel pulled out in 2005 but the Gaza still in a vicelike grip. but Nazi Jews provoke Hamas to violence so as to ethnically cleanse them.”

On 2nd August 2014: “At times I ask myself were the Nazis right in herding the Jews into concentration camps.”

On 5th August 2014: “Sinister similarities to what Nazis did when they lost soldiers in occupied territory. Lessons learnt by Jews.”

On 2nd September 2014: “Rogue Nethanyu [sic] and Jews will never allow Palestine to exist. Their goal? Ethnic cleansing. aided by US.”

On 30th July 2015: “The Jews well learnt well from Nazis hence the easy ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. UN impotent as always.”

On 2nd September 2015: “Nazi Jews hammering the last nail in the coffin spelling Palestinian cleansing.”

On 24th December 2015: “Nazi Jews learnt their lessons well.”

Under the International Definition of Antisemitism, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” and “Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel” is antisemitic.

When Campaign Against Antisemitism called Captain Singh, he admitted that he had sent the tweets and offered “total apologies” and said that he should not have commented “spontaneously” after reading articles, but had no explanation for why he had made the comments repeatedly over the years. When asked whether he supported the International Definition of Antisemitism, he said that he did but then seemed surprised that he had breached it.

Captain Singh has now been suspended by UKIP over the allegations. Campaign Against Antisemitism calls on UKIP to expel Captain Singh from the Party immediately.

Paul Bury #fundie familyfriendlygaming.com

Family Friendly Gaming, the industry leader in covering the family friendly video games is bringing back a popular series on the dark side of gaming. Will there be more issues in this series in the future? That is up to you. If there is a massive support for this series and we can come up with new ideas to write about then the answer is yes. If there is not much support, and we can come up with no new ideas then the answer is no. It is a scary time in our world and in our country. There are those that have embraced the redefinitionist movement and embraced redefined words, morals, ethics, deeds, institutions, roles, and more. In almost every case those that have embraced these redefinitions are actually openly rebelling against God. They try to terrorize anyone who stands up for God. They attempt to silence anyone who embraces traditional definitions of words, morals, ethics, deeds, institutions, roles, and more. We are seeing this in the video game industry as well. In some ways it has gotten even more scary as there are people actually embracing darkness in the video game industry.

Look at how many of the “popular” games on the worldly gaming websites and magazines have you play the bad guy. Look at how many of the new “AAA” titles have morally ambiguous choices the player is expected to enact. It used to be a few evil, vile and wicked games here and there. It has become a trend where evil is being celebrated, and good is being shunned. What does that do to the brain of the players that immerse themselves in this radicalized belief set? What kind of punishment will God doll out to our nation for this open disobedience and rebellion? What punishments did God give out to past civilizations for this kind of dark behaviour? Why would anyone want to bring that down on our heads? What can be done to correct the course? How do we get the entire industry to move away from celebrating darkness? Family Friendly Gaming constantly tries to educate everyone to join us into the light. We won’t force you. We won’t coerce you. We won’t brow beat you. If you choose that path that leads to destruction we will pray you turn from those wicked ways.

I talk to a variety of different kinds of gamers to understand where they are coming from. I talk to a variety of people in video game companies at different levels. I talk to a variety of PR and Marketing people to see what trends they are seeing. The troubling trend of embracing darkness over light is strong in the video game industry. I openly admit this trend is scary on multiple different fronts. I have sounded the alarm. You choose how to react to it.

I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day.

Dave Blount #racist moonbattery.com

Richard Sherman Thuggishly Applies the Race Card

If you want to find a real bigot, look for someone who excuses the appalling behavior of Richard Sherman of the Seattle Seahawks on the unspoken grounds that you can’t expect blacks to show any dignity or sportsmanship. Such narrow-minded racists include Sherman himself:

Seattle Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman said he was bothered and disappointed that he was called a “thug” after his crazed post-game rant on Sunday because he said it seems like “thug” is the “accepted way of calling somebody the N-word nowadays.”

The thuggish rant that appalled the nation after Seattle’s playoff win over San Francisco last weekend may have been contrived. Sherman rose out of the sewers of Compton to get high grades at Stanford. The enraged gorilla demeanor on display probably doesn’t reflect the real Richard Sherman.

Uh oh, now I’ve done it. No one is allowed to compare blacks to enraged gorillas, even when they go out of their way to act like them. If it’s up to Sherman, we won’t be able to call them thugs either. Any extreme of poor behavior must be tolerated, lest we be accused of political incorrectness.

Hopefully no one is missing the irony that this bizarre attitude encourages blacks to behave like thugs, or the even greater irony that the politically correct are the true bigots by implying that barbarous behavior is so inherent to blackness that to criticize it in a black is racist.

Say a Korean went off like Sherman and people observed that he was behaving like a thug. Would that be a thought crime? No, because PC thought police don’t secretly associate Koreans with thugs.

Sherman added, “You fight it for so long, and to have it come back up and people start to use it again, it’s really, it’s frustrating.”

Here’s an idea: if you don’t like being called a thug, stop acting like one. When you do act like one, say you are sorry instead of thuggishly trying to intimidate people with the race card into accepting the unacceptable.

Rep. Trent Franks #fundie lifenews.com

As Americans honor civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., a congressman says the nation is not aware of how Planned Parenthood targets black Americans with abortions. Arizona Rep. Trent Franks says the abortion industry has preyed on African-American communities for too long.

Franks told LifeNews.com today that he is "calling on Americans to work toward ending the abortion industry's disproportionate targeting of minorities."

"Today, we remember Martin Luther King, Jr. for dedicating his life to the fulfillment of a truth outlined in the Declaration of Independence: that all men are created equal, regardless of their skin color," Franks said. "While we have come a long way in the 40+ years since his death, another major hurdle in the Civil Rights Movement still looms before us: the disturbing targeting of minority populations by the abortion industry."

Franks points to startling figures to make his case.

"An astonishing 50% of African-American babies are killed by abortion," he points out. "And nearly 80% of abortion clinics are deliberately located in or near predominantly minority neighborhoods."

Ultimately, Franks says "a minority baby is five times more likely to be aborted than a white child."

Franks is the sponsor of the H.R. 1822, the Prenatal Non-Discrimination Act, which prohibits race-based abortions.

The bill would make it illegal to knowingly perform, solicit, or accept funding for either race- or sex-selection abortions as Planned Parenthood has done.

The Arizona Republican lawmaker says he's not surprised that Planned Parenthood targets black Americans with abortions given comments from its founder.

"The abortion industry's biggest secret is that their entire movement was largely founded by eugenicists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, who infamously said, 'We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,'" he said.

"That appalling outlook has continued to influence Planned Parenthood and the rest of the abortion industry," he concludes.

crusadingpatriot@yahoo.com #fundie strategypage.com

[Er... I will try to explain it softly for you; what you reproach Arabs in particular and all Muslims in general with is to be bloodthirsty fanatics, right? And the only solution is to exterminate them all, right? So that is what we call a PARADOX (do not be afraid of the big word); how can you possibly spit on them if you are just like them? According to your logic, you must apply the same treatment to yourself, right? Sounds complicated? Your fault, not mine!!! Malrait]

There is no "paradox" involved whatsoever. Let me break it down to you logically: Premise 1: Dead people can not be, and are not terrorists. Premise 2: Muslims compose the largest portion of terrorists in the world Premise 3: The remaining subset of terrorists in the worlds is comprised of Marxist-Leftist anarchistic people (liberals) Conclusion: Exterminating all Muslims and all liberals will end terrorism.

rushdoony #conspiracy clubconspiracy.com

Why do you deny The Holocaust?

I don't deny the Allied holocaust against the German people, in which 600,000 civilians lost their lives in deliberate, premeditated, terror bombings of German cities. Several more million Germans were slaughtered by Soviet troops, starved to death in Siberia, raped and tortured, and killed in the post-war expulsions from the eastern territories.

Neither do I deny the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians, the Jewish Bolshevik holocaust against Russia and Eastern Europe or Mao's holocaust against the people of China.

I certainly do not deny holocausts. I think it's more likely that you are the "holocaust denier."

The events you mentioned simply were not holocausts. It is racist to detract from The Holocaust the Germans perpetrated against Jewish people, by claiming there were other holocausts.

Well, then I guess history is racist because, like it or not, the facts of the documentary record clearly show that there have been many other holocausts.

How can you compare the unparalleled sufferings of God's Chosen People who, throughout time have been hunted, persecuted, massacred and finally, exterminated--how can you compare that colossal and appalling slaughter with the mere fights and wars that other people have experienced?

The squeaking wheel gets the most oil. The Jewish establishment has the highest profile in the mass media and therefore to the ignorant, all this Jewish public relations noise translates into some sort of definitive judgment of history.

What you're really peddling is racism--the racism that Jewish suffering, alone among all of the blood of the innocent spilled on this planet, has some special claim on our sensibilities.

I'm sorry, I don't believe it. My understanding of the documentary record doesn't support it. Auschwitz was a much safer place to be than Dresden or any other city of any size in Germany from 1943 onward.

Scott Creighton #conspiracy beforeitsnews.com

(Hyoerlinks taken out)

The fake James Foley beheading video was so badly conceived, in order to try to maintain it’s credibility a little longer, government shills started an online social media campaign in an effort to keep Americans from watching it. But that didn’t work. Sites like mine and a few others (a few) openly discussed the flaws with the production value of the pro-war infomercial and Americans, tired of wars and the lies that bring them, found their way to the video then found their way to sites like this one as that little voice in the back of their heads said “uh. that’s bullshit”

The story of James Foley’s last kneel has crumbled completely as they attempt to salvage what they can from the manufactured consent psyop. The fake head lying on the fake body is their last ditch effort to maintain some semblance of credibility. Let’s do away with that shall we/

(oh wait… another “journalist” claims he memorized James’ last letter home. How touching. How dramatic. How incredibly stupid. You know damn well when they were writing that little plot-twist someone around that table suggested he smuggled the letter out in his butt. You know they did. You just know it.)


The UK Times reported that an international forensic science company, which has worked for police forces across Britain, said there is no question Foley was beheaded but that camera trickery and post-production techniques look to have been used.

“I think it has been staged,” said one expert in visual forensics, after he was commissioned by The UK Times to examine the footage.

“My feeling is that the execution may have happened after the camera was stopped.”

Aymenn al-Tamimi, a fellow at the Middle East Forum think-tank, said over the years ISIS militants have improved the production quality of their videos.

The analysis by experts has highlighted a number of inconsistencies that could suggest that the beheading of Foley, which was seen on the video, was not his actual death. News.Com

Here we are a week later and the MSM is starting to have to acknowledge what most already know from just one glance at the stupid James Foley beheading video: it’s as fake as Joan Rivers’ face.

But they can’t let go of the propaganda no matter how stupid the new narrative sounds: they faked the beheading on camera and then beheaded him for real.

This is the same “ISIS” that beheaded babies?

Now that our work exposing the phony beheading part of the video is complete and the MSM is having to play catch-up, let me explain something to you folks: this is a prop (click on image for larger view) made by Lars Carlsson for the opera Salome on the Malmö Opera in Sweden.

http://www.makeup-fx.com/images/Salome%20421.JPG
stage prop… not a head

That is not Photoshop. It’s not some cheap video editing crap like those new “magic” TV shows. It’s a physical tangible prop. Nothing more. This is the process of how it was made.

http://www.makeup-fx.com/images/Salome%20535.JPG
prop, artist and kid. cute kid

As I and others have painstakingly pointed out over the past few days, the video of the beheading, the speech leading up to it, the bloodless sawing at Foley’s neck with a fake stage knife.. it was all stagecraft and poorly scripted, poorly acted.

We have proven our point and thus won this round of the information war against the hearts and minds propagandists and war apologists getting fat paychecks for promoting violence and death. It really wasn’t a fair fight. The video was as obviously fake as the emperor was naked. Kinda like shooting paralyzed fish in a barrel with a shotgun.

The last thing they have to hang their hats on is that final scene of their sophomoric production, the “head on his back” money-shot.

It’s a fraud. A lie. A prop just like the knife. Just like James.

A skilled artist made that head, not James’ parents.

The one used in the fake video is pretty easy compared to the one pictured above. The mouth is closed, no teeth, no tongue and they even shaved his head so they wouldn’t have to take the time to do the hair, which is painstakingly tedious from what I understand. And unlike this one, they didn’t have to worry about the back of the head or the neck since there was only that one shot from the front.

It makes no sense that ISIS would fake the beheading with a stage prop knife and then kill him off camera. That’s just stupid.

It makes no sense that Foley would go along with the ruse while the MI6 agent pretended to cut his head off. That’s just stupid.

The head on the fake body is a prop just like the knife and we should be just as diligent in promoting that “truth to power” as we were in exposing the fake beheading itself.

How many young men and women, Iraqi or American, are really going to lose their heads over this manufactured consent propaganda? I wonder if James’ proud parents have wondered that while doing the talk show circuit. I wonder if they care.

I care. That’s why I do this. You care. That’s why you’re here.

The epic fail fake James Foley beheading video has been reduced to shambles and now they desperately cling to it’s tattered remains. Let’s push this crap over the cliff like the WMDs story and the Yellow Cake from Niger story because unlike James Foley, you and I still have a moral center and that little voice in the back of our head that says “bullshit”

a calming effect #fundie voy.com

[Replying to "If only we found some group the more fanatic Jews and Arabs hate more than each other..."]The answer ofcourse is the ultimate out-group - the homosexuals! Everybody knows how disease ridden, vile, dirty and infected the bodily fluids of gays are! (Eeeck - grossss!) Just ship all the gays over to the DMZ lines between the Israelites and the Arabs and viola...neither side will risk infection by crossing over gay infested DMZ lines! At last, there will be 'Peace in our time!'

Dr_Henry_M_Morris (aka Kelgan) #fundie imdb.com

Barack Osama supporters sabotaging the new 'American Carol' movie!

Liberals are actively trying to sabotage this film. This movie sold almost no tickets when it was released, and the only logical explanation for this movie's failure is liberal sabotage. Liberals have planted ticket-sellers in theaters across the country who will "accidentally" give you the ticket for the wrong movie, and liberal theater owners have refused to properly promote this movie by displaying the appropriate signs in the lobby.

So, how else can this movie's failure be explained? Either nobody is buying tickets, due to a lack of interest, (highly unlikely, given the major A-list stars in the movie, as well as the thought-provoking script) or deliberate liberal sabotage!

You know, my cousin is a deputy sheriff here in town, and he tells me that whenever liberals start getting too big for their britches, he whacks them a couple of times with his billy-stick, and that really calms them down. It brings them back down to Earth, it brings them back to reality. They don't seem so scary after that.

Well, he's running for sheriff this year, but I'm afraid that his nickname of "Mr. Nice Guy" is going to hurt him at the polls. He has publically admitted to striking liberals only once or twice with his night-stick, rather than the recommended number of 10 times. His political enemies will try to portray him as being weak, they will call him an appeaser, but my cousin is a fighter, and I really like his chances in this race.

usachinanukewar #fundie usachinanukewar.wordpress.com

Simply put and defined. Lord Jesus Christ is my Husband, Boyfriend, Honey, Sweetheart, Darling, Super Sugar Daddy, Emperor. I’m His son and bride and an immortal concubine that always stays calm and cool when witnessing my Husband kissing another saint. I do promise I will never be hysterically crying and weeping and slamming another saint’s immortal face, just because Jesus kisses him or her in a long, sweet French kiss in front of my eyes. Oh, baby, that gotta be a great challenge for me to handle and deal with in my eternal life. Well, that’s just the only problem I might face in my eternal life with my Jesus, my Boyfriend and Husband. I must share my Jesus with other saints. I can do it.

francois #fundie sciforums.com

Is it wrong to be disgusted by homosexuals?

I’m not homophobic, but I’m not ashamed to say that I find many homosexuals to be obnoxious. I don’t have any problems with anybody who keeps his sexual inclinations to himself. However, I have a huge problem with homosexuals who impose their sexuality on me and others. Let me explain what I mean.

I don’t have a problem with women giving me the eye. What I mean by “the eye” is the look a person gives you when it’s clear that they’re interested in you, and they find you sexually appealing. When a person gives you the eye, a lot of communicated. When a woman gives a man the look, it means he can have sex with her if he puts in a little effort. It is unmistakable when it happens to you. Personally, I find it flattering, no matter who gives me the eye. Even if it’s an ugly chick, my ego gets a boost. If it’s a hot chick, it gets an even greater boost.

Usually men don’t give women the eye, because it’s presupposed that the man will have sex with the girl. A man giving a woman amorous eyes would be redundant. Thus, it is questionable when a man does it.

However, when I get the eye from homosexuals, I am put off. I don’t know why this would ever need to be explained to homosexuals, but here it is: Don’t ever assume a random person is gay. Don’t put the moves on another person, unless you’re sure he/she is also a homosexual. Heterosexual males don’t appreciate it when homosexual males hit on them. It is disgusting, because men know men. We know what they want to violate our corn holes and we are disgusted by it. It doesn’t just apply to being hit on. It also applies to compliments. If a homosexual man compliments me on my looks, I don’t take it the same way I would from a woman, or even a fat, ugly woman. I take it that he wants to violate my corn hole.

What pisses me off on top of that is sheer (I’m not talking about all homosexuals—I have no problems whatsoever with people who keep their sexualities to themselves, regardless of what they do in private.) audacity that some homosexual men have. One of my brothers told me a story about him in a bar one time. There was this one guy who joined my brother and his friends at a table. He was a nice enough guy who just wanted to make friends. Then the guy started talking to one of my brother’s friends. My brother’s friend was very drunk and the two of them were hanging out, talking and having a good time. And then suddenly, the guy said to my brother’s friend, “How would you like to give me a blow job in the bath room for 10?” Needless to say, the friend was stunned and stalled — completely caught unaware, not knowing how to respond. My brother then stood up and told the guy that he had to leave immediately. He did. Now, let's ignore the homosexual's lack of social graces. Let's say he was just hitting on him and he didn't actually ask him for a blow job for 10?” It’s still wrong because he was assuming he was gay. It’s stupid for a least a few reasons. One, heterosexual males hate being hit on by homosexual males. Two, chances are high that the male who is being hit on is heterosexual male. This is because we live in a world where most males are heterosexuals. There are a lot more heterosexuals than there are homosexuals. So why do they do it?

It’s arrogant. Do they think if they’re charming enough the heterosexual male might appreciate the effort? Do they think there’s a chance the heterosexual might turn into a homosexual? “Well, I’m not gay, but for you, I might make an exception.” No. Trust me, we don’t want your advances. We don’t appreciate your compliments. We don’t even like hearing you talking about sex in general.

I don’t care about what people do in private. If a man has raunchy dirty sex with another consenting man, that’s fine with me. But don’t talk to me about it. I can assure you, I’m not interested. You’re not special, and I’m not going to make an exception for you. While you’re at it, don’t tell me I’m good looking either. Don’t hit on me, and above all, don’t give me the eyes.

Am I wrong here?

[ Maybe you ping as fag on the gaydar, francois. ]

Perhaps you're right. However, that doesn't matter. The point is, gays should be sure that the person they're hitting on, complimenting or making some kind of advance on, is also gay. So hitting on and flirting with another person of the same gender is fine if you're in a gay bar or in some gay place. That's fine. That's what those places are for. But hitting on somebody or making some kind of advance on a person in a regular bar or any not explicitly gay public place should be absolutely, positively sure that the person he/she is hitting on is also gay. They should bend over backwards. Even if I do look gay (which I don't), a homosexual shouldn't hit on me. Unless a homosexual is in a gay bar, they should ask the people around "Hey, do you know if that person is gay/available for some man-on-man action?" And then when they've talked to enough people to be confident that the person in question is in fact, gay, then that person can go ahead and flirt and camp it up with said person.

[ You seem to have double standards. You're quite ok with heterosexual men "hitting" on girls in bars, it seems, trying to pick them up. But when it comes to homosexual men hitting on men in bars to try to pick them up, then you get all offended. ]

I don't have a problem with homosexuals going to gay bars to pick up homosexuals. That's fine. That's what gay bars are for. Heterosexuals picking up heterosexuals at a non-gay bar is what non-gay bars are for.

[ I can only assume that you feel somehow threatened by homosexuals showing interest in you. ]

You can safely assume that.

[ Yet, at the same time, you can't comprehend that a woman might equally feel threatened by your uninvited interest in her. ]

I can comprehend that, completely. However, it's different, because heterosexuals are a majority. Not only is heterosexuality more common, but heterosexuality is generally deemed less disgusting. A boorish heterosexual male hitting on a poor heterosexual girl is different from a boorish homosexual male hitting on a poor heterosexual male. The difference is huge.

You can call it a double standard if it pleases you. But I really don't see it as such. In the third page of the thread I introduced an analogy with the floggers/fuckers and the tour bus driving driving his sick friends across the country.

I agree with you that some women are disgusted by some males who hit on them. But let's compare that to the tour bus analogy. Sure those few women may suffer from these stupid men hitting on them. But those women are like the three or four out of the 25 people on the bus who are sick from the bus driver who is driving fast. The boorish man who is hitting on the poor girls are the bus drivers.

The homosexuals who are hitting on the horrified heterosexuals are like the bus drivers when the bus is full of 25 sick people. And those people are sick because of the speeding. The bus driver continues speeding, ever merrily to his destination, without a care in the world about the 25 people in the bus who are doubling over in their vomit. It's very inconsiderate in my opinion.

If you were that bus driver wouldn't you slow the bus down for your sick friends if it would make them more comfortable? Even though the bus driver is a minority, he should still take his friends' into consideration. It's really simple utilitarianism. You do what makes the most people comfortable.

[ And yet, you seem quite willing to impose your sexuality on other people. And you also seem quite happy for others to impose their sexuality on you - provided that you welcome their advances. ]

Well, there is a huge difference between assuming that a given person is a heterosexual and assuming he is a homosexual. Huge difference. If homosexuals were a majority, I would probably still hate being hit on them, but I would probably get used to it and eventually learn to tolerate it out of simple necessity. However, they are not the majority. They should try to make the majority comfortable by inhibiting their sexualities in our presence because it sickens us. It's simple utilitarianism.

[ So, it seems to me that what you really want is for people to read your mind and magically deduce whether you want sexual attention or not. If they are a "hot chick", then bring it on. But if they are a "hot guy", they should somehow just know that you're not into that ]

Lol, no. That's not what I want. I already explained what I want. What I want is really quite reasonable. I want homosexuals to find out whether or not I am gay before they grope, give me the eye, or make some kind of advance on me. That's what I want. Let me know if you're still confused. I don't know if I can make it any clearer to you. I have Skype. It might be easier to explain it that way.

[ If you're claiming that men never make sexual advances to girls - that it's always the other way around - you're living in a fantasyland. ]

Luckily, I never said or implied anything of that kind. Males are constantly throwing themselves at women in the hope of a favourable response - much moreso than vice versa.
It's called "trolling." It's a tried and true method.

[ But you're happy to "put the moves on" any women, I suppose. ]

Hold on now. You're being hasty and presumptuous. I'm not happy to put the moves on any woman. I'm not a prick. I only hit on women if they are receptive. I can usually tell very quickly in my interactions with women whether or not they are receptive. If they aren't, I don't waste my time or hers.

[ What if she is homosexual? Shouldn't you check, first, like you expect men to check your sexuality? Tell me - how do you propose that will work? "Hi, I'm Bernard." "Hi, I'm francois." "Just checking, francois - are you homosexual?" ]

Once again, I think you think it's a double standard. But it's really not. It's because homosexuals don't find heterosexuals nearly as disgusting has heterosexuals find homosexuals. That's reason number one. Reason number two is this: there are way more heterosexuals than there are homosexuals. Simple utilitarianism. Are you familiar at all with hedonistic calculus?

[ Why? There's no "violation" between consenting adults. ]

You took that too literally. I was just writing colorfully. I try not to bore the shit out of my readers. I am courteous. I consider others. I wish some homosexuals were the same way.

[ And you think that there aren't equally audacious heterosexual men who go around propositioning every woman they see and think might be fair game? ]

Not really that many guys do that. And yes, those kinds of guys are obnoxious, especially if the attention is unwanted. However, it's not on par with that of homosexuals hitting on heterosexuals. It's really not. I think I've already explained my reasoning to you. I think you can anticipate what I would say to that. If you need it again, let me know.

[ How hard is it to say "Thanks, but I'm not interested"? ]

It's not hard at all. My real problem is homosexuals that give me the look or grope me. Or homosexuals that make out in public places. Homosexuals making out in a public place is not the same as heterosexuals making out in a public place. Once again, I don't give a shit about what people do in private. However, in public, I think homosexuals should still be courteous and yielding to the horrified majority.

Well, it might be a 7 to 1 ratio, or something like that. Not terrible odds. From what I've heard and read, it's more like 1 out of 20, or 5%. They are a minority.

[ Do the men who proposition women think the same thing? ]

Get real man. A homosexual man hitting on a heterosexual man is not the same thing as a heterosexual man hitting on a heterosexual woman. If you think it's the same thing, you need to get outside. Take a walk.

[ I don't think many homosexual men would have a problem with that. They would be quite happy to avoid you. ]

Once again, I don't want them to avoid me. I've had gay friends. I'm not a homophobe. I've made it clear what I want many times, but you keep ignoring it, because you know that what I want is actually quite reasonable. Let me reiterate: I want homosexuals to find out whether or not I am gay before they grope, give me the eye, or make some kind of advance on me. They should be yielding to the horrified majority.

Still confused?

[ In fact, I wonder what francois's religious views are. ]

I have none. I'm an atheist. My disgust for homosexuals imposing their sexualities on non-homosexuals is natural and based on several bad experiences with homosexuals. It has nothing to do with Leviticus, as I'm sure you would love to think.

[ Do you think homosexuals have been accepted as a "norm"? I'll bet Prince_James and francois and Baron Max don't think homosexuality is "normal". ]

Then you would have lost money. That you would so flippantly assume that I would think that homosexuality is not natural or normal speaks volumes about you.

[ You rank people giving you the eye above people dry-humping you? Maybe you meant "and lastly"? ]

Strangely, yes. I've been groped, hit on, and stared at by homosexual men. And I think getting the eye is the worst.

Like this one time I got groped it was by this homosexual whom I know. It was at school. We weren't really friends, per se. But we were on a friendly basis with each other. He is openly gay and I knew he was gay. No problems.

However, one day, I was bending over to get a CD from my bag, and he couldn't resist apparently. He grabbed my ass. And I can completely understand my brother's friend at the bar, who was just completely shocked and stunned and didn't know what to do. I was just shocked and appalled for a good 20 seconds or so. After that, however, I composed myself and calmly told him to never do it again and that if he tried to do it again, I would likely beat the shit out of him. Overall, it was a pretty bad experience. But it wasn't the worst. The worst is getting stared at.

Like this one time I was working. And this homosexual who was buying something was staring at me, giving me the creepiest, depraved smile I've ever seen. Words can't describe how it made me feel. All I can say is that it made me feel really dirty. I felt like I needed to take a shower. I felt like I needed to peel off the first layer of skin cells that were infected by the treacherous photons which bounced off my pure, virgin skin and into this asshole's depraved pupils. Worst experience ever. This happened to me a few weeks ago in the bar. It wasn't quite as bad, but it still made me uncomfortable.

[ It's as wrong as being disgusted by heterosexuals, bisexuals, or asexuals.
It's a form of prejudice to be disgusted by a general group of people in that manner. You have to look at things on an individual basis.
]

I'm not disgusted by all homosexuals: just the ones that make it very apparent that they're sexually interested in me, and those who kiss their boyfriends in public and talk about their sexcapades in public. Normal homosexuals, I don't mind at all. Rude ones piss me off.

GovernmentsGetGfs #fundie reddit.com

I'll try to explain why it is morally ok to kill TAC (btw, TAC is The Atheist Cult, not Club) members.

You see, TAC members aren't human beings at all. They are more like wild dogs or monsters from works of fiction. Mindless, braindead zombies. They have little in common with human beings. They are unable to create original thoughts or ideas. Verbally, they are limited to barking political correctness.

One guy asked me how can I compare TAC to SS or Al-Qaeda. I simply asked him if SS or Al-Qaeda ever wanted to exterminate all the decent people in the world. I don't think so. TAC will achieve exactly that if they're not stopped. They're too stupid to plan it like those two organizations did/do plan their crimes, which is even worse, because the entire process of extermination of all the decent people in the world will take longer and be more meandering.

You can't re-educate a TAC member. A TAC member is a modern 11th century leprous religious fanatic or a die-hard fascist whose endgame, despite him not being aware of it, IS EXTERMINATION OF EVERY SINGLE DECENT PERSON IN THE WORLD.

What would you have people do with TAC members? Jail them? They would try to escape, they would try to kill guards.... It's impossible.

TAC members are worse than any religion because no religion worshiped their gods as much as TAC members worship theirs.

Believe me, it would be better for TAC members to just be put down.

Does this mean I will kill TAC members myself? No, because I fear legal retribution in doing so, as they are mistakenly seen as humans. But I will make damn sure that people understand that they're not humans and outlaw them.

Art Nickel #wingnut merriam-webster.com

Words can change and the people who used to use that as a derrogatory term for abolitionists are the Snowflakes of the 21st Century. Today it simply means a crybaby, snotnosed, Progressive Liberal Socialist Democrat (PLSD; see Urban Dictionary) or someone who has mass but no substance. A person who can't take the heat. A person who is a perpetual victim. And, worst of all, a person who believes in the economic slavery that is socialism, including welfare, public housing, and government-paid medical for all on the backs of those who work hard. Snowflakes, in perhaps the closest sense to the 1860s use, are also those who want to support all the world's rejects even when they don't come here legally and who recogize the only "religion" in the entire world that mimics Naziism in its desire to rule the world and its willingness to kill all who don't join in and worship allah.

RunToWin (le sigh) #fundie teens-4-christ.org

[Regarding a new law in Iran to give the death penalty to pornographers]

It's funny how much higher standards Muslim countries have about certain things. Like porn, modesty, and homosexuality. I heard from a missionary in Afghanistan that the villagers were appalled by the rebellion the Americans produced in the youth when one of their young boys wore a baseball cap backwards.

missfilmdirector #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Atheists, what would happen if there were no Christians?
Would USA exist today?

What if there were no pilgrims?
Telling Indians that they are living like animals.

And no Spaniard wouldn't even bother the Indians...
There would be no Hispanics.

No African Americans...

No Pope. No Crusaders...

And we all be living under Kings and Queens and Emperor and live in Europe forever... still.

So do you dislike Christians that much?

You're saying we are living backward?

Everything we Christians accomplished in the past and today...

You don't appreciated it?

What if we do something about the Middle East, and change everything there... maybe those people will be like us...
Maybe their future children will appreciate us Christians.

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

Whosover wants to overthrow Assad of Syria, wants to murder all Alawites and murder or expel all Christians. There used to be a moderate opposition, composed entirely of do-gooder employees of “NGOs”, which is to say, employees of the State Department, but they all got out when things went bad, and are now employed on various do-gooder international grants all over the world, such as settling Somali refugees on middle American marginal electorates in flyover country. The opposition to Assad is now 100% head chopper Muslim. The Cathedral delusively imagines it can regain control once they have finished chopping off heads.

Whosoever wants to overthrow Assad of Syria, wants to ally with people unlike me, to murder people who are like me, to murder them for what they have in common with me. Murdering some people who are like me, murdering them because they are like me is a step towards murdering everyone like me.

It is striking that the advocates of reason, rationality, niceness, and maximizing everyone’s utility always wind up with pyramids of skulls. The French revolution was in large part a creation of the cult of reason, and I see the same evil and madness in today’s rationalist community, for example the Bay Area rationalist community, whose rationality is strikingly and conspicuously limited by their refusal to engage in thoughtcrime and their demented demonization of thought criminals.

Recall the Populares of Rome. “Populares” is latin for “Democrats”, or “People’s Party”. In the end they allied with the Samnites. I suppose the Populares wanted to give the Samnites citizenship and fairer treatment, because that is the kind of moldy bananas the Populares stood for, being nice to people, especially the oppressed, remedying justice and inequality, rationality, reason, and reasonableness, all that filthy disgusting garbage. The Samnites, however, wanted to overthrow the walls of Rome, kill every Roman male, and rape every fertile age Roman woman. The Populare/Samnite alliance strikingly resembles today’s progressive/Muslim alliance.

The fans of kindness, niceness, pleasantness, reason, and rationality tend to wind up quite unreasonably and unpleasantly torturing and murdering very large numbers of people. Hostility to near is a key foundational principle of leftism, goes down all the way to friends, family, and political allies.

War with Syria is war on the side of Jews against the side of Christians, since Assad is keeping Syrian Christians alive, and Israel is backing the side that wants Assad (and Christians) dead. I don’t think this is a matter of the Zionist Occupation Government ruling the world. Rather it is that the Cathedral, though it hates Israel, or rather hates Israel being Jewish, wants a non Jewish Israel, hates Christians even more. The Cathedral is allied with Israel the state, but there is a point of contention, since they cannot stand Israel being Jewish or India being Hindu, any more than they can stand America being Christian. Israel the state wants Syria the state in chaos, and the Cathedral wants to rule Syria and imagines it can rule through the head choppers. Were they to actually succeed in ruling through head choppers, Israel the state would find itself under a lot heavier pressure to become less Jewish, but the Israelis doubt that this outcome is very likely.

Trump’s attack on Syria was both real and fake – real enough to threaten Assad and Putin, real enough to get his judge through the senate, real enough to keep the Pentagon on his side, fake enough to avoid war with Assad and Putin. What is clear is that the left wants to overthrow Assad. If we continue to take substantial measures to overthrow Assad, then Trump will have cucked out to the left as the Czar did, which I think will likely be the death of Trump and his family, as it was the death of the Czar and his family. Any concessions to the left are just blood in the water. They are more likely to kill you if you play nice with them than if you piss on them.

When Obama took power, we were involved in two pointless unwinnable wars in the middle east, where we supporting the side that could perhaps be argued to be the good guys, though it was far from clear who the good guys were.

When Obama had governed for eight years, he had gotten us into five more pointless unwinnable wars in the middle east, where we are for the most part supporting sides that are appallingly evil and indiscriminately murderous.

When I say unwinnable, it is not that we lack the capacity to defeat a bunch of backward goat herders. It is that we lack the capacity to defeat a bunch of backward goat herders when our troops are required to behave like heavily armed nursemaids, and when I say pointless, I mean that the victory condition is defined as our enemies liking us, rather than our enemies being dead or enslaved. If you forbid our troops to kill civilians that are intermixed with our enemies, our enemies will grasp civilians to their chests. If you applied the the old laws of war, which allowed you to flatten enemy cities and such like, civilians would separate themselves from combatants, and combatants would have no reason to prevent them from doing so.

And now Trump is under extreme pressure to bring us into war with Syria, North Korea, Russia, and China, and may well be cucking out under that pressure, bringing us from seven low level wars in five of which we are allied to the bad guys, to eleven wars, in three of which we will be the bad guys, and two of them likely to go thermonuclear.

Why is it that the fans of niceness and rationality tend to be unpleasant and irrational, from the Bay Area Rationalist community to the Khmer Rouge?

It is because caring for your children, your spouse, your lover, your sisters, your brothers, and your friends is likely to be expensive and inconvenient. Caring for far away people located in places you cannot find on the map tends to be a whole lot cheaper and much more convenient.

And thus it is no surprise that Badwhites look after their children, their spouses, their kin, their lovers, and their friends, while Goodwhites do not look after their children, their spouses, and their kin, and routinely stab lovers and friends in the back. Often stab kin in the back also – observe what happens when the old man dies, and fights over the inheritance break out. Leftists lie, betray, and sometimes murder, in order to rob their brothers and sisters, sometimes even their parents and their children.

Can you imagine one of ours suckerpunching an Obama supporter to the enthusiastic cheers of everyone who voted against Obama? Reflect on the Yellow Hat incident – the video shows yellow hat being sucker punched, presumably because he formerly wore a Trump hat. There is just no way that could happen on our side. Nasty goings on when inheritance is being distributed always involve lefties behaving ruthlessly to close kin. Normal people generally cooperate with close kin. The rubbish and destruction left after left wing protests, as compared to the neatness and order of right wing protests. It is not like a ten percent greater likelihood of littering and vandalism, it is a thousand fold greater likelihood of littering and vandalism.

Lord Howe arranged for his men to die. The Victorian anti slaver movement committed perjury in court. Who kills commies? Commies kill commies. It is totally and completely one sided. Nazis, right wing dictators, right wing death squads kill hardly any commies by comparison. It is not like there is a ten percent greater tendency to murder their own, it is more like a thousand fold greater tendency to murder their own.

Would our people have produced something like the “10:10 no pressure” video?

The moral difference between lefties and normies is as clear as the trail of rubbish that they leave in their path.

Hostility to near is a key foundational principle of leftism, goes down all the way to friends, family, and political allies. Hence Lord Howe. If your commanding officer is a leftist and he orders you into danger, desert.

Leftism as an individual propensity is a propensity to game the systems for status, affiliation, alliance formation, and virtue signaling. Leftism as a movement is large scale organized gaming of the status, affiliation, and virtue signaling systems, and thus tends to work to the disadvantage of individual leftists. No friends to the right, no enemies to the left, means all your friends are your enemies and all your enemies are your friends, hence the greatest danger to leftists as members of a leftist movement is being murdered by their own movement.

If you are genuinely decent and conscientious, you are substantially less interested in cheap signals of decency and conscientiousness. Decent conscientious people are not attracted to whatever opinions are high status. People who want cheap ways of signaling decency and conscientiousness are attracted towards whatever opinions are high status.

Thus, observe …

Tony Alamo #fundie alamoministries.com

I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully” (I Tim. 5:14). (Preteen and teenage young women who have reached puberty and are having sex without being married do give occasion for the adversary to speak reproachfully about them, and is fornication, sin, which causes fornicators to go to Hell.1 If they get abortions, this is murder. Murderers cannot enter Heaven!2)

What is a young woman? GOD’S commandment, if a woman desires to be married, would be at the age of puberty. Webster’s definition of “puberty” is: “the age when one becomes capable to bear children, which is marked by maturing of the reproductive organs, with the onset of menstruation in the female; the period at which sexual maturity is reached. The age of puberty varies in different climates and environments, being from thirteen to sixteen in boys and from twelve to fourteen in girls, and is commonly designated legally as fourteen for boys and twelve for girls.” Webster’s Dictionary states “childhood” is the “state or time of being a child; state or time from birth or infancy to puberty or maturity.”

Linda #fundie bigstory.ap.org

{How dare people use there constitutional rights in a way that you don't approve of. So what if what other people do is a "sin" - how do gay people "sinning" effect you?}

There is nothing whatsoever in the Constitution of the United States of America about "the right to get married". This is an invention of the sodomite mafia, whose intent is to actually destroy marriage and punish Christians for adhering to the word of God and the Natural Law.

How "do gay people sinning effect me"? Each sin committed by every person on earth disturbs the perfect harmony of the universe as created by God--yes, including my own sins. Each sin effects every other human being on earth in a negative way. Ever hear of a rotten apple in a barrel of good apples. Well, we all have our rotten apple moments. How else does sodomite "marriage" effect me? Because when you redefine something that is ONLY ONE THING, to something IT IS NOT, then that ONLY ONE THING becomes anything. Three to a marriage, women marrying their dogs, 5 guys marrying each other. Yep, all of these things have been in the news the last 3 or 4 years.

Also, the homosexual lobby SWORE all they wanted was to marry the one they love, and didn't want to hurt anyone else by their love of each other. Oh, really? That has been proven to be a vicious, deliberate lie by simply looking at the Christian florists, bakers, photographers, bed-and-breakfast owners, wedding venue owners, etc, who have lost their livelihoods, been fined tens of thousands of dollars, evicted from their business, liens put on their homes, ruined reputations, death threats... I could go on and on and on. The bullies in the sodomite deathstyle won't just go to a baker who will bake them a cake with 2 lesbians or 2 homosexual men on top of it--they deliberately target Christians in order to punish them. Enough said.

Patrick Scrivener #fundie reformation.org

EMPEROR JESUS CONSTANTINE WAS APOLLO MANIFEST IN THE FLESH!!

SAINT PAUL SAID THAT "ELOHIM WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH" (I TIMOTHY 3:16). LIKEWISE, SATAN
WAS ALSO MANIFEST IN THE FLESH IN THE PERSON OF EMPEROR JESUS CONSTANTINE!!
Apollo was the son of Zeus and Leto. His name is spelled Apollon in Greek and it means DESTROYER or EXTERMINATOR:

And they (demons) had a king over them, who is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek Apollyon, in Latin Exterminans (Apocalypse 9:11, Douay-Rheims Version).

Delphi in Greece was the HQ of Apollo worship, and "pilgrims" came from all over the world to have their futures foretold. Alexander the Great consulted the oracle before he set out to conquer the world.

The oracle of Apollo at Delphi was one of the most famous shrines of divination in the ancient world and it was a fantastic cash cow for the priests of Apollo.

To the great dismay of the priests, the oracle stopped working after the Resurrection of Christ from the dead.

Apollo is a copy of the Egyptian god Horus who was always depicted NAKED. Part of the worship of Horus and the golden calf included making people naked:

And when Moses saw that the people were naked (for Aaron had made them naked unto their shame among their enemies). Then Moses stood in the gate of the camp, and said "Who is on JEHOVAH's side let him come unto me" (Exodus 32:25-26).

Horus, or Apollo worship, is indeed very ancient.

Apollo was the sun god and his devotees believed that he drove the chariot of the sun across the sky each day.

December 25th was his birthday!

As the "patron god" of music, Apollo was depicted holding a musical instrument called a lyre.

Lucifer or Satan was in charge of the heavenly choir before he led the revolt against JEHOVAH....Apollyon is the only god with the same name in Greek and Latin. He had a twin sister named Artemis; who was called Isis in Egypt, and Diana in Roma.

Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid #fundie islamqa.info

(He's referring to "The Sims")

Praise be to Allah. We are appalled by what we have seen of clips from this game – especially in the second and third versions, and there is no evil action or immoral deed but it exists in this filthy game. It also contains music, dancing, wanton display of beauty, drinking alcohol, complete nakedness of men and women, illicit relationships between the sexes, kissing and touching private parts; it is so bad that there is even committing fornication completely, which is not found even in ordinary movies!

And all of that is with the excuse that they are animated characters, as if the one who watches it will never be affected by what he sees and that it will never be provocative. The game includes “university life”, “nightlife,” and “New Year holiday” in which there is dancing, singing, kissing and illicit relationships, and Santa Claus appears to distribute gifts to the children. We do not know, by Allah, how any Muslim could accept to allow his daughter or his wife or even his son to play this evil game. This is natural in the life of Western families, who has deviated from all decent behaviour and noble characteristics, and there are those who want this to be natural in the life of Muslim families too.

We have previously discussed the prohibition on looking at cartoons that include nakedness and permissiveness, in the answer to question 167710. Based on that, it is not permissible for a Muslim to upload this game or play it, and it is not permissible for him to allow any member of his family to do that. Whoever does that is neglecting his flock for whom Allah, may He be exalted, has made him responsible and he is failing in his duty to advise them and to pay attention to their upbringing, behaviour and attitude. We have issued a fatwa specifically about pornographic cartoons, their real nature, the danger they pose, and the ruling on them. See question no. 115149. And Allah knows best.

Dr. Masaru Emoto #fundie amazon.com

The Hidden Messages in Water Paperback – September 20, 2005

In this New York Times bestseller, internationally renowned Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto shows how the influence of our thoughts, words and feelings on molecules of water can positively impact the earth and our personal health.

This book has the potential to profoundly transform your world view. Using high-speed photography, Dr. Masaru Emoto discovered that crystals formed in frozen water reveal changes when specific, concentrated thoughts are directed toward them. He found that water from clear springs and water that has been exposed to loving words shows brilliant, complex, and colorful snowflake patterns. In contrast, polluted water, or water exposed to negative thoughts, forms incomplete, asymmetrical patterns with dull colors. The implications of this research create a new awareness of how we can positively impact the earth and our personal health.

Steven R. #fundie simplychristian.fandom.com

Sermon 11: The New IFB

By Bro. Steven R.

Psalm 51:10 “Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me.”

Pastor Steven Anderson held the “Make America Straight Again” conference in Orlando recently. He was responding to the worldliness of the wicked sodomite reprobates who are recruiting our impressionable youth with candy and fun carnival games and watching carnjval barkers in funny costumes do wacky stuff. The the drag queens and transsexuals take off their clothes and the wicked police force does nothing to enforce public nudity laws!

Satan’s own harlot, Taylor Swift, released a video for her “hit” new single “You Need to Calm Down.” Drag queen and transsexual galore! They mocked Christians as uneducated hicks who can’t spell! I don’t know about you, but I for one am appalled because I am a college graduate!!!!!! I graduated top of my class at Bob Jones University back in the day!

The Old IFB has become very worldly, enjoying smut like a Taylor Swift videos that celebrate sodomy as well as feature Taylor Swift wearing immodest garments like lingerie and a bikini! She also had fake hair dye that apparently is of the bisexual colors! Confirms that she’s a bisexual and engaged in lesbianism with Karlie Kloss! The Old IFB is also okay with wicked video games like Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto and Super Mario Odyssey! Horrendously wicked sinfulness! The Bible says to be IN the world but not OF the world! Apparently they hath not the salt of the sea! We need to rise up and join in the NEW IFB and have a grand spiritual revival! CAN I GET AN AMEN?!!!

Shawntheimmortal942 #wingnut #racist deviantart.com

No, this isn’t a joke or a parody...these characters are real. For fucks sake, it’s one thing to try to take back insulting words but this ain’t the way, Fam! This looks like shit I’d write! Seriously with these names, “Safe space” and “Snowflake”!? Marvel needs to die because this shit is just...no. I think 2020 is the year all comics should just die...just put them out of our misery and just end it all.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

We have become so apostate and hardened nowadays that we refer to good things as being "wicked." For example: Here's a Google search for the phrase, "wicked dude!" Satan is effectively confusing young people today by redefining Biblical terms; thus removing the only words in society that demonize sin.

I recently went through a MacDonald's drive-thru and was offended by their advertisement for "wicked" Happy Meal toys. It is a sin to misuse Biblical words. People often call their food "sinfully delicious," but this is wrong. Sin is a serious matter with God, and we shouldn't make light of it. TV's late night shows continually sport and joke about homosexuality, adultery, and every sexual sin imaginable; but God says... fools make a mock at sin (Proverb 14:9). We are living in a nation of fools. Sin sends people to Hell and is a serious matter.

Pastor Mark Downey #racist kinsmanredeemer.com

How many Christians are aware of the appalling estimate of 100,000 children missing each year? Thousands are murdered with the blood drained from their little bodies. The jewish people are entirely capable and complicit in committing this dastardly deed. The immense weight of historical evidence conclusively points to the repetitive psyche of murder in the jewish soul for Jesus Christ and everything Christian. How many of the innocent youngsters you see on milk cartons have fallen prey to the ceremonial knives of rabbis and lie buried in secret graves or were ground up into dog food in some jewish-owned processing plant? This all may sound unthinkable and outlandishly far-fetched to the cognitive dissonant mind that has been conditioned to eagerly accept the mythos of 6 million gas-bag jews turning into ash, after 60 years of Pavlovian movies, books and TV. It would be quite another story if these medias were not owned and/or controlled by jews. You would be hearing about the greatest murder plot against humanity in the history of the world.

The Naive Gatekeeper #fundie bclaym.wordpress.com

The Coming Theocracy is a Good Thing.

With this post, I may-and I emphasize may-be parting ways, or leaving behind or coming to a fork in the road regarding my online relationship with some of my WN/ethnonationalist friends and comrades. We’ll see.

The reason for this will probably be because what I see coming down the road as I have called in the title, will appear to many of them as a bad thing, when actually it is a good thing.

The word theocracy of course indicates “religion” and brings to the minds of many, the Afgan Taliban, or at minimum, the Muslim religion resembling something like what exists in Saudi Arabia, or one of the other Middle Eastern countries.

Religious rule, according to views of those who worship at the altar of democracy like multitudes of Americans, is uncivilized, backwards, stone age, and neanderthal. Of course, as I have been “preaching” on here from March 2010, they who hold such views, are themselves also religious in their defense of democracy, and are fanatical in fighting and defending it, having no compunction in lying, subterfuge and hypocracy while doing so. Democracy is the peoples right to corrupt, pornify, and defile ones own nation/country, under the guise of “freedom” or “freedom of expression”, while simultaneously being protected by the government from any consequences of their actions.

The impetus behind democracy is evil and my friends and comrades better get used to this truth. We are not just at war with a bunch of deceived, otherwise decent people just like us. No. Democracy may have a nice face on the surface; an apparent desire to do good and pushing programs/laws/policies to make the world a better place to live, but behind this Walmart smiley face is the power of darkness – evil.

The Obama’s, Pelosi’s, Reid’s; the bankers of all the various capitols in the world, most congressmen, etc, all operate to further the ends of evil in their sphere of influence. My friends and comrades must come to the understanding and get used to the idea that we are in a religious war, and that we are on the side of good, fighting against evil.

Having this knowledge, makes our job easier. To refuse this knowledge because of prejudice against christianity or religion in general, causes us to wage war with one arm tied behind our backs.

Many say christianity is just an extention of jewry. Yes, as I have repeated ad infinitum, much of today’s version of christianity is totally jewified and in love with all things, israhell. The Texas preacher Hagee and his followers for instance. However, the deceived exceptions do not make the rule. Just because many professing christians have apostasized – fallen away from the truth – does not make the whole lump worthy of disgarding. We should not treat christians the same way we treat jews. Many of the former have partial blindness at present, but the ONE who is in charge of this whole thing is able to open their eyes at the proper time, so that they can be of great assistance in the coming days.

Paul Bury #fundie #conspiracy familyfriendlygaming.com

Family Friendly Gaming, the industry leader in covering the family friendly video games is continuing our transparency. I am feeling a mixture of exhaustion and disgust all at the same time. Peter was live streaming a sponsored video on Youtube which he correctly identified as a sponsored video. Youtube suspended and deleted our channel right in the middle of that (February 14, 2020). There were no warnings. There were no strikes against us. Our account was clean and clear. Our account had fought off the Reused Content false accusation, and multiple false copyright strike accusations. We have fought for what is right over a year now. Youtube comes up with some new scam to punish us for being Christian and conservative.

At this point I am fed up with Youtube. I am sick and tired of always having to fight them as they continue to abuse their power. I am sick of the swamp of corruption that is Youtube. We just got the 100K plaque celebrating how Family Friendly Gaming passed one hundred thousand subscribers. We were actually almost to 104K subscribers when this happened. Someone at Youtube obviously hates us. Someone at Youtube is obviously trying to cancel and destroy us. We worked hard these last six and half years making good quality videos that are many times educational, and sometimes entertaining. We do not scam or spam with our channel. We are not misleading anyone in anything.

At this point I am sick and tired of this garbage. Youtube can change the rules whenever they want to. Youtube can redefine words to discriminate against people they hate. Youtube can lie, and falsely accuse without any punishment. I quickly appealed their bad decision, and then started researching it. I know I did that backwards. I was freaking out. Here again Youtube was adding stress and anxiety to my life. I think they are trying to kill me with their venom and hatred. I tried to go back and add to my appeal. I found out at that point that Youtube allows one appeal only, and then whatever they decide stands. They have zero transparency into their process. The appeal was denied. We have reached out to Youtube contacts and we have trying to get some assistance.

I have had enough of their constant discrimination against Christians, conservatives, men, traditional, and white people. This has gone on for too long. Youtube has gotten worse and worse. Their behavior should be boycotted by anyone with common sense, civility, and decency. Even if they reinstate our channel, what is to stop them from doing this again? They are so abusive, obtuse, and arrogant that they will allow this horrible behavior to continue within their company. For a year Youtube has cost us tens of thousands of dollars we earned. We project the lifespan of our channel could reach 100 million dollars. That is money Youtube is stealing from us based on a false accusation. Why go back to a place that treats me like a slave, and worse?

What does the future hold for our videos then? At this point in time I do not know. I am sick of Youtube. I am tired of their discrimination. I am tired of their harassment. I am tired of experiencing their hatred. I really do not know of any viable alternatives. I may look into additional server space to house videos on our website. There are of course potential problems with that. I may be completely done with videos. We can still stream on Twitch so that is something. I have looked before and not found good alternatives to Youtube for our videos. The other sites are even worse on the copyrighted music. I do not know if there are any good solutions going forward. Evil is obviously flourishing because good men and women are doing nothing. We have brought this issue to your attention. Can you help?

CALL TO ACTION: Please go to Youtube, on the bottom left of the screen is a leave feedback button. Please click that button and leave this feedback: "Please restore/reinstate the FamilyFriendlyGaming YT channel." If enough people leave this feedback Youtube just might reverse the decision.

I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day.


God bless,
Paul Bury
Emperor
Family Friendly Gaming

AV Publications #fundie shop.avpublications.com

Questioning today’s Holy Bible is just as rebellious as questioning ones gender. God did it right the first time. A man-made makeover brings “confusion” and defaces and mutilates God’s creation. Only pride and perversion would propel men to presume that they could improve upon God’s own handiwork. This book will bring Greek and Hebrew study out of the closet for the first time. Tumbling out come the starving skeletons of the authors of Greek and Hebrew study tools, lexicons and editions, the sordid sources from which new versions, such as the NIV, TNIV, NKJV, ESV, NASB, and HCSB take their corrupt words. These are the very same study ‘aids’ which kill a sermon or Bible study when used to ‘define’ a word in the Holy Bible. Lexicon and Bible dictionary authors dug down into the depths of pagan lore, then ransacked the English dictionary to find a match which could burn the Bible word-by-word. The smoke darkens the directing light of the holy scriptures. This book will document that men who want to change and redefine the Holy Bible are likely to want to change anything – even Bible doctrine, their own gender, and their god. For example, Luciferian connections shadow Trench’s New Testament Synonyms and Ginsburg’s TBS Hebrew Masoretic text.

Paul Bury #fundie #elitist familyfriendlygaming.com

Family Friendly Gaming, the industry leader in covering the family friendly video games is continuing to be the voice of diversity in the gaming media, and media at large. We have long supported obedience to God versus all of the variety of ways some people find ways to rebel against God. Which is why I am dismayed to hear such horrible, evil, vile, and wicked rebellion against God in some circles. I hear some people say: “we must boast and be proud. It is loving to be proud.” I strongly disagree with that. Are you familiar with the Love Chapter in the Holy Bible?

1 Corinthians 13:4-7

4Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.
5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.
6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.
7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

Love does not boast and love is not proud. Those out there claiming it is loving to be proud, and boastful are rebelling against what God set in place for us humans. They are preaching the exact opposite of what the Holy Bible teaches. We are to stand up against pride since it is evil. We should work on being humble in our lives. That is why Family Friendly Gaming supports humility. We do not support pride. We do not support boasting. Boasting and pride are not loving. They have no part of love whatsoever.

It dismays me deeply that some people have twisted words and definitions so badly that they now have the exact opposite meaning when those redefiners speak or write them. This is another reason why Family Friendly Gaming continues to stand up against those trying to redefine words, institutions, morals and ethics. The Holy Bible is clear on what love actually is, and what it is not.

I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day.

God bless,
Paul Bury
Emperor
Family Friendly Gaming

Darien Santiago #fundie davidjstewart.blogspot.hu

[Formatting from original. It took me at least 10 minutes to properly format this as I found it, lordy help me. Also, I am aware that part of this quote has been previously posted, but you are missing out if you don't see it with the formatting, as well as some portions of the article.]

David J. Stewart Defended
By Darien Santiago

I am writing this article in defense of one of the mightiest soul winners, and one of the mightiest Bible preachers, and hands down, my favourite Bible preacher DAVID J. STEWART of http://www.jesus-is-savior.com. I am supremely saddened by the amount of criticism brother Stewart has to endure. Quite frankly, I will here confess, that Mr. David J. Stewart is my FAVOURITE BIBLE TEACHER. Without a doubt whatsoever, Mr. David J. Stewart's website called http://www.jesus-is-savior.com is the BEST website that has EVER at ANY point in time been placed on the internet. NO OTHER WEBSITE can compare to the outright scholarly work of Mr. David J. Stewart. Mr. Stewart's website is arguably the best Christ honouring website that has EVER been displayed on the internet. Mr. Stewart is one of my personal heroes, and I am not only saddened, but enraged, when I see so much slanderous talk out there against the mighty Bible preacher, David J. Stewart.

[...]

David J. Stewart TELLS IT AS IT IS. That is why so many people have a problem with him, and those that have a problem with Mr. Stewart are almost always either unbelievers who are spiritually dead and on their way into the lake of fire to die the 2nd death, or they are carnal believers who do not understand what it is like to be spiritually mature in the LORD. Why do so many people resist the Word of God? Because it makes them uneasy in the moral standing. They love their sins and they don't want to hear that their deeds are evil. They don't want to be reproved for their errors, and consequently, they shun the Word of God, they supress the truth, and drown out the truth by rushing on into their immoralities, completely ignoring and disregarding the inspired, inerrant, infallible, impeccable, incontrovertable, preserved, perfect, defectless, unblemished, unequaled, unmarred, untainted, untarnished Word of the Most High God. If therefore, that is the case, then why do men have a problem with David Stewart. I'll tell you why, because he is an uncompromising, Spirit filled, God loving, Christ honouring, sin hating, soul winning, Bible believing, Bible preaching, soldier of the cross of Christ. That is why. He preaches the Word of God AS IT IS, and if people hate the Word of God, then, how much more likely shall they hate them who preach it.

Mr. David Stewart preaches the Cross of Christ, he preaches the blood of Christ, the power of Christ, the Gospel of Christ, and the love of God, manifested in the sacrifice of Christ for the sins of the elect, right? WRONG! He preaches the love of God, manifested in the sacrifice of Christ for the sins of the WHOLE WORLD. I have NEVER seen a man as Biblically solid as Mr. David J. Stewart. The first time I read his articles I was surprised that he agreed with me on so many points. I will plainly say, I have been called a "nut", "fruit loop", "fanatic", "heretic", "mentally challenged", "retarded", "lunatic", and "1 dimensional", all because I BELIEVE THE WORD OF GOD. Judging by the fact that Mr. Stewart and I hold an EXACT DUPLICATE of beliefs, I assume he has also been called those things like as I have been. The only reason why people would label Mr. Stewart as a heretic, is truly because most of the world today is mentally ill. Consider it, born again Christian believers are being called heretics by a baby murdering society (abortion)? That is farfetched beyond imagination. Only in this sin cursed world is a baby murder (abortion) considered wise and a Christian considered a dunce. Imagine that! Born again Christians who love our LORD and God, Jesus Christ, are labeled as fanatics, fools, dunces, kooks, freaks and weirdos. No, no, no. May I say unto you, it is not the Christians who love God who are mentally challenged; it is the 90% of the world's unbelievers who are mentally challenged.

[...]

My beloved brother in the LORD, David Stewart, worry not my beloved and dear Bible preacher, your God and my God, even the great God, the true God, the everlasting God, and the only God, even El Elyon, even El Shaddai, even Jehovah Elohim, the same, will deal with those who have slandered you, I can assure you that, and furthermore, thou knowest already my precious and beloved brother in the LORD. You are loved David. By God, and by this old sinner, miles away from you. You are loved, and your ministry is precious.

GOD BLESS DAVID J. STEWART.

Dynastia #fundie kiwifarms.net

[Topic called "Is Suicide Selfish?"]

Yeah, it is. With the exception of people with terminal illnesses, your problems are not so bad that suicide is anything but fucking ridiculous. Losing someone fucking sucks, and if you're willing to let the people around you go through that just because you think you have it like shit, you're selfish.

Everyone dies. It's the most natural thing in the world, and we all have to learn to deal with our loved ones dying. It's sad, and then you get over it, because that's what people do. If honestly you think people should feel obligated to suffer through a miserable life they don't want to live just so you don't have to deal with being sad for a few weeks, you're the selfish one.

what's a good reason to kill yourself?

Not wanting to live. That's good enough.

You really are a disgustingly selfish person, you know? I'm not even saying this to try and insult you or shame, I just think you have no idea how incredibly morally bankrupt you are because you're blinded by your own selfishness. You are quite literally saying that if a person is in such crippling overwhelming misery that they're ready to take their own life, they shouldn't do it because you will feel kinda sad about it, maybe even for a longish time, and they should consider your feelings first.

That's appalling. You are appalling. You are an appalling, disgusting human being. Just look at what you're saying. You're telling people with a case of the sads so extreme that they are literally ready to die to escape it that they should stay alive being that miserable, indefinitely, because if they die you'll have a much smaller and manageable case of the sads. You are looking at massive, unthinkable cases of the sads and saying "No, that's not as important as whether or not I feel a little bit sad and they should accept that." This is like telling a starving man he should give you his sandwich because you're slightly hungry. Your sense of entitlement is incredible, and your myopic blindness to it utterly disgusting. You might consider yourself a good person, you might do good things, make the world around you a little better, but I want you to know that no matter what you tell yourself, you are such a fundamentally selfish person that you assume starving men should give you their sandwiches.

You need to reevaluate your moral compass, because assuming your feelings should be the center of it makes you an appalling piece of shit, dude. Appalling.

I'm just saying, death is kinda permanent. There's better solutions. If you really feel like you can't handle it, fine, do it. I'll deal. Don't pretend like it's some big moral issue that I'm minimizing the pain of the mentally ill when you're minimizing the pain of the people around them. It's not like the death of someone close to you is something you shrug off, that's bullshit. Emotions are erratic, sporadic, and lie to you. I've felt that, friends of mine have felt that. Shit has looked bleak many times and we've carried on and had brighter days. Your feels are a fucking stupid reason to kill yourself. If I'm bankrupt for that, cool.

So now you're basically saying the starving man should give you his sandwich because if he works really hard he could have a roast dinner instead.

Morally bankrupt, dude.

Everyone that cares about you is going to fall asleep a couple of times a week trying to push your death out of their minds, wondering what they could've done differently. It's going to last the rest of their lives and it'll probably cause them to fail in the exact same way you did, you loathsome piece of shit.

lol no it's not, holy shit. What kind of weak shit is this? People die. Most of the people you love are likely to die before you. You get over it. It's not life-shattering, it's not unsurmountable, it's normal. That's what literally everyone who has ever lived does, and has been doing since people have been around. If you're so weak that you can't even cope with the basic fundamental reality of life and death that all of us are expected to live our lives around, then you should just kill yourself. Nobody would blame you (except entitled little pissbabies like you, I guess)

lol That's sociopathic.

Yeah, death happens. If you choose to inflict the grim realties of death on someone, you are either insane or a piece of shit lol.

I feel sorry for your loved ones, and hope you never put your sociopathy into practice lol.

So you think people should suffer through long miserable lives they don't want to live just so other people don't get bummed out for a while that they're no longer around being miserable? That's sociopathic.

Life sucks and it doesn't stop sucking until you die, but that doesn't give anyone the moral right to make it worse for others.

Cool so if you're in a shit marriage you should stay in it because your husband will be sad for a while that you divorced him?

It's your life. Nobody elses. Nobody else has the moral authority to tell you it's wrong to opt out.

I have experience in this field.

Pretty much everyone has experience in this field. Suicides aren't rare. I would honestly be surprised to meet anybody over the age of 25 or so who has never had a loved one commit suicide.

In the end though, people fall into two camps when dealing with it. Some people are reasonable, compassionate, understanding human beings who accept reality and move on with their lives. And some people are screeching crying selfish babies who want to yell at a corpse for inconveniencing them.

HARVARDCRIMSON12 #conspiracy constantsupervision.wordpress.com

The vagina produces a thick fluid known as copulin that has actual mind control effects on a male’s brain. If a man is exposed to a woman’s copulins, over time she will be able to:

1) Change, remove, or insert memories.

2) Tell the male what he sees, hears, feels, smells, tastes.

3) ?Insert subconscious thoughts that will surface as “his own ideas” or behavior later.

4) ?Plant trigger words or actions that can cause thoughts, actions, or sensations in the male at later dates (days, weeks, even months).

”Karl Grammer and Elizabeth Oberzaucher, researchers who study how the human scent influences sexual attraction, found that when women are ovulating, they produce pheromones called copulins. Copulins have a distinct smell, which Elizabeth describes as “butter that has gone bad.”

When a man gets a whiff of copulins, his testosterone levels rise. As a result, he secretes androstenone, an odor that repels women who aren’t ovulating.”
Through the process of coupling a female and male will lay relatively still without having sex with the penis inside of the vagina. The process may take up to 15 minutes and works faster and more efficiently when the female is on top of the male. During this period the vagina injects up to 1/2 cup (100 ml) of the copulin fluid into the urethral opening at the tip of the penis, which is chemically attracted to semen, and will follow the semen down the shaft directly into the testicles. After 15 minutes of coupling the copulins will have entered the blood stream and traveled from his testicles up into the hypothalamus (a section of the brain that controls hormones) causing the male to become completely influenced by the needs and suggestions of the female.

Once a hypothalamus is flooded with copulins, the male brain is just sitting on idle, with only the bare minimum of thought process. In this state, the male is probably not thinking of anything at all, but any input from the female will become the male’s singular focus.

After multiple couplings:

the male hypothalamus completely ignores his own polypeptides while her copulins are present, even if the female gives no input. Although the male is not forming many original thoughts, the brain is still communicating ideas back and forth; however, these ideas are completely regulated by what the male already knows the female expects.

Some women report having conflicting issues of morality concerning coupling and the effects of copulins producing a false sense of happiness in the male, and others more boldly state they see no problem with coupling and have ”coupled” their husbands while he was asleep. This is usually done in the morning when the male is naturally erect from a relaxing night of sleep. Women have given testimonies about the influence of coupling has on their husbands. For example, they routinely do all the housework and are more eager to spend time with the children.

Playing the field

”Over time, the presence of a womans distinctive copulins and hormonal scent becomes addictive to the male, which is why a young emperor or prince was often given a large number of females that he could rotate between, never allowing himself to become addicted or under the spell of one womans copulins.”

Warning

Copulins are often sold over the counter and online in 100% concentrated form that comes in a perfume spray. This perfume spray will have the same effects on the male as the coupling process and will enhance her ability to control a male.
Copulin sprays create the highest state of sexual euphoria known to man. So intense they can become mind controlling and last for days. Copulins will excite and entice any man or any woman individually, or both genders at the same time. Beware!

Synopsis

You see, the chemistry of a women is to attract humans [in dangerous ways], specifically males and more specifically the sperm, but the scent of their copulins will mentally weaken a person and systematically works to relax them (regardless of gender), artificially making them seem safe. Whether it be to tell them their secrets (instinctively they gather and pass along information this way) or to distract and sexually arouse someone. That’s just how those chemicals effect the polypeptides in the hypothalamus gland of your brain. The colliding forces of copulins will also cause collective thinking in group of women, especially if they are ovulating at or near the same cycle. Fifteen minutes is all it takes for copulins to take over a majority of the hypothalamus gland. Even less time if you are having sex with them . If you are within 3 feet of an ovulating woman or group of them YOUR polypeptides are being replaced at a rate of 5% a minute with THEIR copulins. Yes, you are being chemically drugged by women, even if you are a woman. Over time the brain becomes addicted to a particular scent of copulins, which is why a young emperor or prince was often given a large number of concubines (female sex workers) that he could rotate between, never allowing himself to become addicted or under the spell of one womans copulins. Lastly, when around 80% of your polypeptides have been replaced they will they are able to:

1) Change, remove, or insert memories.
2) Tell the male what he sees, hears, feels, smells, tastes.
3) Insert subconscious thoughts that will surface as “his own ideas” or behavior later.
4) Plant trigger words or actions that can cause thoughts, actions, or sensations in the male at later dates (days, weeks, even months).

Good luck! It’s a jungle out there!

n/a #fundie theaustralian.news.com.au

Zilla Huma Usman, the minister for social welfare in Punjab province and an ally of President Pervez Musharraf, was killed as she was about to deliver a speech to dozens of party activists, by a "fanatic", who believed that she was dressed inappropriately and that women should not be involved in politics, officials said today.

Ms Usman, 35, was wearing the shalwar kameez worn by many professional women in Pakistan, but did not cover her head. [...]

Mr Sarwar appeared relaxed and calm when he told a television channel that he had carried out God’s order to kill women who sinned. “I have no regrets. I just obeyed Allah’s commandment,” he said, adding that Islam did not allow women to hold positions of leadership. “I will kill all those women who do not follow the right path, if I am freed again,” he said.

The-Daily-Foreskin #conspiracy #racist deviantart.com

Here are some FACTS that would be illegal to publish in Germany (why to they make it illegal to dispute it other than BECAUSE THE HOLOCAUST IS AN EASILY DISPROVED LIE):
In fact, all available evidence suggests a consistent policy of enforced evacuation and deportation, throughout the Nazi era. The Germans wanted a Reich free of Jews, and thus they corralled them into camps, and then systematically evacuated them to the Eastern regions. Yes, many would die in the process; a regrettable loss. But this is ethnic cleansing, not genocide—something the Israelis are eminently familiar with.

To argue for mass killing, Hart relies almost entirely on ten entries from the Goebbels diary. Unfortunately he has a very superficial knowledge of this subject. Had he done even a bit of research, he would have found my on-line article, “Goebbels on the Jews” (www.inconvenienthistory.com).

There I examine 132 separate entries, covering the final nine years of his life. Roughly 90% refer only to evacuation and deportation. There is not one entry on industrial mass killings, not one entry on gas chambers, not one entry on Auschwitz. Even in the most damning cases, Goebbels uses ambiguous wording such as Vernichtung and Ausrottung, which refer simply to complete elimination or removal; neither term entails killing.

In fact only a single entry, in March 1945, refers explicitly to the killing of Jews—which is unexplainable, if his policy was indeed one of mass murder. He had no reason to cover up the truth in his own private diary.

Hart’s one other bit of evidence, Himmler’s well-known Posen speech of 1943, explicitly equates deportation with Ausrottung, or “extermination.” The full phrase is, “I am now thinking of the evacuation of the Jews, the Ausrottung [‘extermination’] of the Jewish people. … it is in our program: deactivation [Ausschaltung] of the Jews…” It was their presence and their power that was to be eliminated.

Regarding the gas chambers, very little can be determined from the Jewish Auschwitz survivors, even ones we trust. What, after all, did they see? Jews forcibly sent to the camp, under appalling wartime conditions. Families separated, never to meet again. People dying from typhus, dysentery, and other diseases. Cans of deadly Zyklon poison (for fumigation of lice). Dead bodies. Corpses being burned in crematoria. But all these things are completely comprehensible—and in fact expected—in a wartime concentration camp. None of this entails mass murder in gas chambers.

What none of the survivors have seen is 2,000 live Jews forced into an underground chamber, Zyklon pellets dumped on their heads, and then 2,000 dead bodies hauled out. And the fact that no one has seen this strongly suggests that it never happened.

Independently, it is an utterly ludicrous way to kill masses of people: packing victims into an underground room with military-like precision, dumping cyanide pellets on them (that continue to out-gas for two or three hours), and then gingerly hauling out dead body after dead body without killing yourself or your worker-slaves. And the job’s not done yet: now load four or five dead bodies at a time on a small freight elevator, to send them up two floors to the crematoria ovens, where it takes one full hour to incinerate one body—hardly the streamlined industrial killing operation that we’ve been sold.

Furthermore, few (including Hart) realize that Zyklon was the alleged murder weapon for ‘only’ one million Jews; another two million were allegedly killed in carbon monoxide gas chambers, primarily at Treblinka and Belzec. Unfortunately this is yet an even more ridiculous scheme: to pump engine exhaust into a sealed, airtight room packed with people. The alleged diesel engines put out far too little CO gas to be effective, and in any case one cannot pump exhaust gas into a sealed space. For that matter, with an airtight room available, one has only to shut the door and wait 30 minutes—and all would suffocate! The entire gassing scheme collapses into absurdity.

As to the third point, that the “6 million” figure might be a considerable exaggeration, Hart simply says, “so what!” In fact, the best revisionist estimates suggest that perhaps 500,000 Jews died during the war years—a staggering 90% reduction from the claimed number. Well—so what? Historical accuracy, for one; when speaking of the “greatest crime in the history of humanity,” we should at least get our numbers straight. Secondly, this would reduce the Jewish death toll to barely 1% of the total war dead, turning it into a mere footnote of history.

But most importantly, it makes starkly clear the degree to which the world has been bamboozled by the international Jewish Lobby. The sheer fact that large portions of the public and academia have been cowed into accepting a patently false storyline—one that serves only to benefit a small Jewish minority—is beyond reprehensible. It is criminal; and the criminals ought to be called to account.

Jackie Alnor #fundie scatteredsheepreport.blogspot.com

The New Holocaust

The modern-day holocaust of babies in the womb can be compared to the attempted genocide of Jews and homosexuals under the Hitler regime. The government approval of the "final solution" was the law of the dictator. Therefore, German citizens looked the other way as smoke rose up from the concentration camps. When the American military liberated Auschwitz and saw the remains of the carnage, they forced the local Germans to see things up close - they were considered accomplices to the crime since they knew what was happening and did nothing to stop it. Civilized humanity was appalled at the German people for their complacency.

Christians are responding in horror to attacks on abortion clinics. They are appalled that they would be blamed for such acts of violence. If it is blamed on "fundamentalists" does that mean true "fundamentalists" would not want to be judged capable of going to such an extreme to save defenseless children? Would it be a shame to "fundamentalist" Christians that one of their own would shoot up a gas chamber and kill executioners? Would these same Christians condemn the Corrie ten Booms for defying the law by helping potential victims escape certain death?

We are all hypocrites who say the lives of unborn babies are equal to the lives of toddlers. We must stop saying we believe that when we really don't. Because if we did, we would applaud all abortion clinic bombers. We have to be honest with ourselves - we do not believe our own rhetoric. I include myself since I could never take up arms against Planned Parenthood.

So lets get real. We either treat these babies as victims of a holocaust and respond as humans, or we stop claiming fetuses are just as human as children - or people of any age for that matter.

Abortion is truly the national sin of America. We are all guilty for saying one thing and doing another. We have not gone so far as to shed our own blood to save the lives of innocent babies - so their blood is on our collective hands. We cannot turn our noses down at the German citizens of the 1940s, while we are guilty of the same sin of omission.

The prophet Daniel and his prayers confessed his own sin and the sin of his people Israel. Should we not be doing the same in our prayers and confess our own sin and the sin of America?

- A fellow coward and hypocrite

Shadow Drone #racist answers.yahoo.com

The United States of America is a country infested with cultural degeneracy, full of vulgar, subversive, corrupt, very unintelligent and destructive politicians, it struggles greatly to distance itself from serious global problems and seems to exacerbate them much of the time, it is overrun with vile globalists and their allies (Hello George Soros and his funded cronies), flooded with poorly informed, emotionally immature, arrogant and weak-minded people (the types seen on Mark Dice's petition videos) and suffers serious and persistent appalling occurrences enabled by ethnic heterogeneity. Its constitution promotes heterogeneity and its controlled media and politicians promote heterogeneity and/or decadence to the gullible masses for their own damaging agendas.
?
One could be forgiven for believing that the USA is inherently unviable, doomed to become a sinkhole of misery, savagery and moral pestilence. Racial preservation and anti-Muslim immigration policies are very difficult to pass there due to its widespread immature and bleeding heart mentality, constitution and infernal political system.

Its only redeeming qualities are its progressive laws on freedom of expression, provision of advanced equipment for Western militaries and the rather high level of general physical attractiveness of their "white" women (partly thanks to our racial subgroup's genes).

Pat Robertson #fundie religionlo.com

Televangelist Pat Robertson recently repeated his prediction that LGBT rights will provoke God to destroy America’s financial markets, warning “The 700 Club” viewers that God’s wrath is on its way. He claimed that the U.S. is turning into Sodom now that it has “enshrined sodomy into the United States Constitution” and cities like Houston are trying to “force women to go into men’s bathrooms and men to go into women’s bathrooms.”

“Now it’s a constitutional right for sodomites to marry each other,” he lamented, warning that “the wrath of God is revealed against this stuff.” He explained: “I don’t want the wrath of God to hit this country, it’s a great country, I’d like to see America continue strong, but this is one way of weakening it. First of all, we’re going to have this financial collapse. We’re setting up for a massive financial collapse and I think if God is going to hurt this country that’s probably the way he’d do it.”

At that point, a viewer called in and inquired Robertson whether his grim predictions of such a crisis can somehow be averted, to which Robertson gave a somewhat confusing answer: “I believe so, yes, but we need to stop spreading lesbianism and homosexuality in order to achieve that. And the only way to stop the spread of these diseases that are plaguing the country is to make some sort of obvious distinction between gay people and normal, straight people.”

“I personally believe that we must impose a rule on the gay population that would require them to wear specially-colored clothes, for example. I’m thinking we need to go through the Senate with this and we need to make it official. That way, regular people would know that the person wearing the said color is a deviant sodomite and that they need to stay away from them at all cost, as well as keep their children away from their reach,” Robertson opined.

The viewer then interrupted “The 700 Club” host to state that “that sounds awfully like what Nazis did to Jews in the events leading up to World War II,” referring to the fact that Jews in pre-WWII Poland and Germany were made to wear Jewish badges, or yellow badges, which were cloth patches that Jews were ordered to sew on their outer garments to mark them as Jews in public. It served as a badge of shame.

“I don’t believe that,” Robertson quickly became defensive. “I am simply talking about protecting regular people in America, not setting out gays and lesbians as members of the population that should be tortured and slaughtered in concentration camps. Do you understand my point of view here?” the host asked the caller.

“I do,” the caller replied. “But I also understand that you’re trying to do to gay people what the Nazis did to my people more than half a century ago. And I am appalled by it.”

James Weidmann aka Chateau Heartiste #sexist web.archive.org

Lots Of Feminists Are Getting Banged Out By PUAs

Ronin asks:

Just out of curiosity, have any of the real PUAs here ever used game to nail a Jizzabel-type feminazi?
As an aspiring womanizer, you don’t need to act with intent to nail an avowed feminist. If you scavenge snatch in the SWPL regions of any major American city (barring a few notable exceptions*), you WILL have collected more than a few feminist notches on your bedpost. This is because most girls in the big blue population sinks of SWPL-Land are feminists of one stripe or another. You can’t swing an Emperor Deluxe condom without hitting a feminist in the cooch if you live or operate within these zones of misandry.

Of course, not all SWPLcity feminists are cut from the same unsanitary napkin. SWPL chicks generally fall into three main groups of feminist identification:

1. The Femcunts

These are your Jizzebomb fanatics, the devotees of feminism as a life-affirming ideology. They are the smallest in number, but the loudest in bitchery and kookery. This is the kind of manjawed girl — typically a lawyer, academic, organic farmer or diversity consultant — who reads and comments daily at sites like Feministing and Slate/Salon/SuckMyClit with furrowed brow, regurgitating what she learns therein at parties and in the middle of dates, exposing a vile expectation that all the world should agree with where her retarded logic takes her. As long as you don’t embroil yourself in her occasional tantrums at invisible enemies, and keep the pick-up light and breezy while steering her in different conversational directions whenever you sniff the approach of another feminist tirade carried along by the id winds, you will get the bang. She is, underneath her femcuntery, still a woman, and as such (however much you may need reminding) she will respond viscerally to ancient cues of your mate worthiness, and her vagina will flower in spectacular opposition to the wilting of her mind. You don’t want to stay with women like these beyond a few hate smashes, so for shits and giggles I suggest you regale her in the morning with your support of the Second Amendment and the ludicrousness of the equal pay myth. For bonus soul-shivving points, casually muse aloud, after you have sprayed her mug and she’s inserted her glazed face into your armpit nook, that 1 in 5 women who are being raped will orgasm during the act.

2. The Partisans

These are the girls who occasionally read feminist blogs (usually when a fat femcunt friend passes along a link) and parrot the benumbing Cathedral crap they hear on TV and read in approved MSM papers. But these soapbox episodes are blessedly infrequent and pass unremarked, unless they manage to corral some dipshit manboob into acting as a sounding board for their cockamamy nonsense on white male privilege and socially constructed beauty standards (Hugs Shyster, Scrotumless Scalzi, I’m looking at you two distilled estrogen pools.) They believe the feminist canon, but live and conduct their dating lives in a decidedly non-feminist fashion. You will rarely, for instance, find a fattie or a mustachioed Marcuntte wannabe amongst this group. At the end of the day, they like being girls, and are all too happy to ignore the inherent contradictions between feminism and their love of shopping for shoes and falling for assholes.

3. The Lemmings

You have to understand that the anti-feminist/pro-rationality message does not get out in America’s major cities. There simply isn’t an anti-Cathedral reporting or opinion outlet with enough heft to influence more than a tiny fraction of women away from the idiocy that is feminism. This being the case, MOST women in the cities will have spent the better part of their sexually adventurous single girl years steeped in the platitudes of feminism, and they will know nothing else. Combined with women’s natural aversion to abstract thinking beyond immediate, selfish concerns, what you wind up with is a population of lickspittle lemmings who mindlessly nod in agreement every time a talking head exploiting this deficiency in the mental circuitry of half the voting public sonorously intones something about “equal pay for equal work”, or “war on women”. The Lemmings, by far the largest group of women you will likely encounter unless you live in South Dakota, include all types of girls, from club sluts to self-important HR robots to daddy’s princesses to deliriously frantic scenesters. Luckily for your sanity, these girls do not take feminism seriously; not if we measure “seriousness” by the frequency and intensity with which a person holds a belief. They are far more interested in looking hot for you, and gossiping endlessly about relationship drama in their circle of friends. Sure, if you press them “What do you think of free birth control?”, they’ll eagerly approve and perhaps segue into a condemnation of those “rape-y Republicans” and Sandra Fluke’s godliness, but mostly they just go about their lives oblivious to feminism’s charms.

So there you have it. Given that 90% of your city’s women are feminist in name if not in execution, the odds that you will bang out, or currently are banging out, a feminist are pretty good. Most hardcore feminists, whether or not they know it, are fucking men who either pretend to give a shit about their precious ideology, or don’t even bother with the pretense of pretending to give a shit about it. In fact, the majority of men, and an even bigger majority of players, are like me: they find feminism absurd on its face and will dismissively change the subject anytime the girls they are seeing make the mistake of veering into feminist bromide territory. Most girls are sensible and will know when their feminist retardation is turning off the men they like, and will quickly fall in line with the change of subject.

There are exceptions. A few supercharged feminists will eventually wind up with sycophantic manboobs for lovers, and a more perfect pairing I couldn’t imagine.

*I currently live near one of those notable exceptions, and damn straight I’m keeping that info close to the vest.

**Many SWPL cities have geographically extensive ghetto areas, which I don’t consider part of the SWPL, or feminist, world. Ghettoes are like exotic locales that SWPLs like to brag they’ve lived in for six months, when in fact all they did was read about them in the crime section, or pass through them on a bus.

Craig Weiler #fundie weilerpsiblog.wordpress.com

[On the internet persecution of psychics like himself:]

I remember the irony of it on DailyKos; these were liberals committed to calling out Republicans on their nonsensical talking points and demanding facts, all the while spewing skeptic talking points and avoiding the facts. It was as if the mention of psi flipped a switch inside of them and all their brains fell out.

I've come to understand that it is time to redefine what we're dealing with:

Bigotry.

I know that skeptics don't see themselves that way and I understand their reluctance to take on that label, particularly when they see themselves as defending rationality and protecting the public from scams, but is what they're doing really any different from scores of other conservative people who have calmly expressed why other groups needed to be marginalized? I don't think so.

When skeptics claim that psychic ability doesn't exist, what does that say about us? That we're either frauds or feebleminded? An attack on psychic ability is actually a very personal attack on us.

And as a result, many of us have had to hide our ability and have not been free to be who we are. We live in a society that only allows us to operate on the margins and dismisses our abilities as mere "magical thinking." I am tired of it.

What all of this means is that we are just like every other minority group. Nothing is going to change until we make it happen. We are not fighting the slowness of the advance of science, we are fighting bigotry.

manofire #sexist coalpha.org

YOUR GIRLFRIEND DESERVES TO DIE
The world would be a much better place to live in if it were guaranteed that wicked men died as virgins. I’d like to be able to point at a typical bully, abuser, or thug and taunt that no woman would ever want him. It’s the only thing they understand. They have no conception of morality, unable to perceive humanity as having any purpose beyond feeding, fighting and fucking. Especially fucking.
We’re taught that women are the arbiters, offering future offspring to those whose genes should be passed on. We’re taught that they drive the process of evolution by selecting only the best and the brightest men.
Oh, I wish. Why bother trying to better yourself as a person when there are thousands of battered, raped, psychologically broken and easily manipulated BUT TOTALLY HOT girls turning eighteen every day? They’ll even do anal if you verbally abuse them enough!
I try to keep fighting. I try to deliver punishment whenever I can, within the bounds of social decency, which doesn’t get me far at all. Any argument I can try to lay down is always met with “Yeah, well MY GIRLFRIEND…”
One day, I’d like to be able to respond “Too bad, son. I’m putting her down. Step aside, I’m a professional.” Of course, that’s a lie. I’m not a professional. But I have to start somewhere. If you don’t treat your toys nicely, I throw them away. Because that’s all that these girlfriends are. Toys.
I cannot see them as human beings for they offer nothing to the human experience. They will create no art worth seeing, write no tale worth reading, have no thought that couldn’t be gleaned from Nicholas Sparks novels and trite ‘inspirational’ posters. They have the intellectual curiosity of a germ. They believe that ambitions are something for other people. They seek happiness in nothing but the love they give to others, believing their relationships to be divine and meaningful rather than something that is easily replicated by a Labrador retriever. Therefore they do not know that they are endlessly rewarding the evil deeds of men unworthy, and thus inadvertently weakening society. And quite frankly, they’re not even pretty. Nothing is lost if I put them down. In fact, we have everything to gain. But her mommy and daddy will be sad. :’C Of course your girlfriend isn’t like that, I’m sure she’s a beautiful and unique snowflake. She’s had some troubles in the past, but learning to trust you has made her so much better. Please. there is no such thing as a cute couple none of you fucking fucks are cute you’re all stinking sweating bags of meat propagating a race of pig-apes in the absence of a benevolent god who has either fucked off to another universe or been buried under a pile of innocents lying cold and rotten in a mass grave and here you are making gifs of yourselves kissing as the value of human life continues to deteriorate i would sell your souls for a pistol loaded with a single bullet this is how much i hate you this is how much i hate a world that you exist in my prayers for annihilation dissipate into the empty cosmos and die as you ought to your story ends here

pastoredsmith #fundie #pratt christiannews.net

pastoredsmith:
Abortion is murder, according to the same beloved science that liberals and atheists claim to believe in (some worship science, too).

Canis Vulpes:
Nonsense. Nobody worships science. We accept it when it presents evidence obtained from data and measurement.

pastoredsmith:
Nonsense. Atheists worship science. It is their way of trying to disprove the existence of God; but it fails miserably. Man's postulated theories about the existence of man are nothing more than fairy tales. You accept only what you imagine. Data and measurement mean nothing to atheists who simply want to shape their worldview by "interpreting" the facts to suit themselves.

Canis Vulpes:
Atheists accept science. There is no such thing as worshipping science. Worship means bowing and praying and submitting.

pastoredsmith:
No, it means abiding by, swearing to be true and placing it as the #1 thing in your life. The scientific babbling theories of man has replaced God, therefore you worship science. Might want to look up the word worship.

Canis Vulpes:
No Pastor. That isn’t what worship is. And I DID look the word up. Did you?
Worship (noun): the feeling or expression of reverence and adoration for a deity.
Worship (verb): show reverence and adoration for (a deity); honor with religious rites.
Notice how religion and a deity must be present to be conditional on the definition. And so my advice is to not toss around words lightly or give them frivolous meanings you want them to have.

pastoredsmith:
Bahahaha....now, you've gone from "funny" to completely absurd. An atheist telling a pastor what worship is....I'm rolling on the floor laughing at your absurd efforts to try and redefine worship since you refuse to acknowledge the presence of God. God says that we should have no other gods (as in "fake" gods) before Me. One worships at the shrine of many things....but you know that, and that one single fact is what makes this whole thing absurd.

Canis Vulpes:
I’m not telling you what worship is. The dictionary is. Does the dictionary often make you roll on the flor with laughter?
The rest of your message is simply you trying to change the subject. The religious act of worship is a very specific thing. Me liking my PS4 a lot isn’t worship.

pastoredsmith:
No, nothing funny about the dictionary; rather, it's your pathetic lack of understanding what a "deity" and worship thereof is.
Imagine that. An atheist trying to tell a pastor what worship is and is not. Yes, I'm still laughing at your ignorance. I pray you find some sensible solution to the idiocy that has blinded you.

Canis Vulpes:
I understand what a deity is. It’s God. It’s not money or fame or wealth or any of the things you continue to insist constitute worship. Which you’ve even been shown by the dictionary definition of worship is wrong. That is the only issue of consequence here, despite your attempts to mock and laugh and jeer - very “pastorish” behavior by the way. Don’t pray for me. Pray for your own ignorance.

LowOil #fundie freerepublic.com


[From a thread about Conan O'Brien's recent jokes about Jebus...]

To: JTHomes

"I am not sure the joke was directed at Jesus. The point of the bit seems to be that this dumb country singer is so homophobic that he even puts Jesus under suspicion, which, because it is ridiculous, is what makes it funny. Although, not married, in your 30's living with your mother, makes you wonder....(sorry, I sometimes can't resist offending the easily offended, but that was JUST a joke)"

Anything that tries to push an homosexual agenda on people, be it humor, sarcasm, or ridicule via tongue and cheek is a joke that is lobbed towards Jesus. This joke was directed in several directions at once with it's splatter effect, ie. southerners, religious, cowboys, and people of morality... Homophobe is the liberals invention to counter their Moralphobia. Moralphobia translates into Christphobia.

Sorry, but Conan crosses the boundary with this one, his whole show (and several of his late night competitors) is to take the low road for a laugh, and most people that have any backbone avoid it like the plague.

BTW... the easily offended (as you like to call us) has watched as these so called entertainers have dragged morality down to the dirt and then want to press it in your face. We have watched lately as Janet Jackson throws her boobs in our face on prime time without warning, we have watched as government redefines "marriage". We have seen what it has done to our nation.

It about time some actually got offended. IMHO...

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

Queen Victoria's top secret 1868 Swiss vacation with John Brown!!

The queen had grown so fond of John Brown that she invited him to accompany her on a top secret weight reduction vacation in Switzerland.

Between 1867 and 1868 the queen suddenly gained a lot of weight eating Scotch porridge and haggis.

She decided that trekking up and down the high Swiss mountains would be the ideal weight reduction regimen.

Her vacation was to be top secret and she was to be known only as the Countess of Kent.

Here is the announcement that was made in July 1868 by British foreign secretary, Lord Stanley:

The Queen will leave England early next month for a short residence in Switzerland. As Her Majesty goes abroad entirely on the recommendation of her Physicians, in search of the change of air and repose which they consider so essential to her health–she will maintain the strictest incognita during her absence–refusing even the visits, as well as the attentions usually paid to Sovereigns when travelling on the Continent and in such circumstances. (Arengo-Jones, Queen Victoria in Switzerland, p. 43).

The planning and execution of the weight loss vacation was carried out with military precision. The smallest details were not overlooked.

General Charles Grey was the queen's private secretary.

Lord Stanley was the British foreign secretary.

Incredibly, Dr. William Jenner–the man who poisoned her husband–was her personal physician during the vacation.

The queen left Osborne House in the Isle of Wight on August 5 and crossed via yacht to Cherbourg, France. Emperor Napoleon III provided his special saloon train to take her to Paris. After a brief stopover in Paris, she arrived in Lucerne, Switzerland, on August 7.

The queen arrived in Lucerne on August 7 and stayed at the Villa Wallis.

The disappointed Swiss were not allowed to pay homage to their sovereign aka Countess of Kent.

[...]

Benjamin Disraeli was Victoria's next love!!

The Scottish Rasputin had a lot of competition for the affection of Queen Victoria. Disraeli did not like the Highlands, so he had to confine his visits to the times she was in London or the Isle of Wight. Victoria was 54 at that time and "Dizzy" was 69.

Benjamin Disraeli was prime minister during the queen's visit to Switzerland.

Queen Victoria referred to him affectionately as "Dizzy."

During his second term as prime minister he gave her the flattering title "Empress of India."

In 1875, while serving as prime minister, Disraeli engineered the financial coup that transferred ownership of the Suez Canal from its builder, Ferdinand de Lesseps, to the British Empire. In 1876, Disraeli rammed a bill through Parliament that gave his lover Queen Victoria the flattering title "Empress of India."

So influential was Disraeli in creating the British Empire "Jewish" state that the inmates call themselves "Israelis" after Disraeli.

[...]

Jack the Ripper was a grandson of Queen Victoria!!

The notorious serial killer Jack the Ripper, who terrorized London in 1888, was a grandson of Queen Victoria.

Prince Albert Victor was a grandson of Queen Victoria and the prime suspect for Jack the Ripper.

Incapable of learning, the Prince was encouraged to concentrate on painting.

Queen Victoria had to call on Dr. William Jenner to end his reign of terror.

Albert's mother, Princess Alexandra of Denmark, despaired of him ever learning so she encouraged the "artistic" side of his nature:

Like his mother, Prince Albert Victor was congenitally deaf, a condition whose effects were aggravated by his poor education. Many regarded the Prince as backward. Being deaf herself, Alexandra could understand his problems, and she came to realise that he was of an artistic, rather than an academic, bent. Like other disabled people he found it easier to express himself in art than in the classroom. (Fairclough, The Ripper and the Royals, p. 1).

In 1892, before his timely demise ended his Ripper rampage, he was engaged to Mary, Duchess of Teck, the grandmother of the present Queen Elizabeth II.

Winston Churchill was a grandson of Queen Victoria!!

Femme fatale Jennie Jerome from Brooklyn was the mother of Winston Churchill. His father was the future Prince of Wales who eventually became King Edward VII–"Edward the Caresser."

Winston Churchill was a grandson of Queen Victoria.

There are no known photographs of mother and grandson as Winston was adopted by Lord Randolph Churchill right after his birth.

Winston inherited his grandmothers artistic ability.

Jennie Jerome's dark looks were attributed to Iroquois ancestry, so the British aristocracy derisively called her "Sitting Bull." In fact her ancestors were British Empire "Jews" from Newport, Rhode Island.

Steve Deace #fundie barbwire.com

Since our Leftist media seem anxious to have a conversation about theology, I say we oblige. This week in their trolling of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker presents a panel discussion on whether or not President Barack Hussein Obama really is a Christian.

Although Mr. Walker is the son of a Baptist preacher, the Republican is not the most qualified individual to determine who is and isn’t a Christian. The “good news” (pardon the pun) is I know someone who is.

Even better, he’s very much alive and kicking as we speak. And he’s so eager for his opinion to be known on such matters that he preserved a written record of all his thoughts and deeds, which has become the greatest best-seller in history.

Who is more qualified to consult on who is and isn’t a Christian than Jesus Christ?

When I asked him what he thought, Jesus made it quite clear that President Obama is not a Christian. And he was also kind enough to give me some quotes I could pass on to ya’ll.

“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6)

Mr. Obama has referred to Islam’s Koran as “holy” (which means a state of completeness/perfection set apart from the sinfulness of man), and Muhammad as a “prophet” (which means truth-teller).

However, on the most important point of them all Islam and Christianity contradict each other. Islam teaches that Jesus wasn’t even crucified, which means he wasn’t resurrected. But the Bible teaches there is no Christianity without the crucifixion and resurrection (or what Christians celebrate on Good Friday and Easter). These are irreconcilable views. So right away these two religions are incompatible, and at least one of them is lying.

Christianity and Islam could both be false, but they can’t both be true. No sincere Christian would elevate something that distorts and diminishes the fundamental moment of Christianity as “holy.” Nor would they bestow the title of “prophet” upon someone who has spread a false message about Christ.

“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” (Matthew 7:21)

Just because someone claims to be a Christian doesn’t mean they are one. It’s not like Mr. Obama would be the first politician to claim to be something he’s not.

“Why do you call me ‘Lord, Lord’ and you do not do what I say?” (Luke 6:46)

Jesus commands us not to lie, yet Mr. Obama has lied repeatedly (“if you like your current health care plan you can keep it,” as just one example). Jesus commands us not to murder, yet Mr. Obama is the most pro-murder president we have ever had (including voting against a bill to protect babies who survive abortions while in the Illinois State Legislature). Jesus says marriage is between a man and a woman, and we are created male and female. Yet Mr. Obama promotes redefining marriage and so-called transgenderism.

“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another.” (John 13:34)

Jesus gave this commandment to his followers, yet under Mr. Obama we see Christians consistently targeted for their beliefs (Hobby Lobby, Chick-fil-a, Little Sisters of the Poor, military personnel, and numerous other Christians who refuse to comply with Obama-imposed immorality). Why would a president who’s a Christian use his power to consistently target other Christians?

“For whoever is ashamed of me and of my words, of him will the Son of Man be ashamed when he comes in his glory and the glory of the Father and of the holy angels.” (Luke 9:26)

From excluding references to Christ on the official White House Christmas card, to referring to Jesus as “a son of God” (when Jesus claimed he was the only son of God), Mr. Obama has gone out of his way on numerous occasions to deny the supremacy of Christ. What kind of Christian would deny the power and glory of his own savior?

“So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.” (Romans 10:17)

Mr. Obama‘ spiritual mentor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, was Mr. Obama’s pastor for 20 years. He baptized Mr. Obama and his daughters, and officiated his wedding to the first lady. Through the years, Mr. Wright taught many things from his pulpit like anti-Semitism, black liberation theology, racism, conspiracy theory, and Marxism.

[...]

Jesus says sincere faith comes only by the hearing of his words. With Mr. Wright preaching nearly everything but Jesus‘ actual words, how could Mr. Obama come to sincere faith in such a church?

“Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.” (Matthew 7:15-20)

Given everything you’ve already read, would you say Mr. Obama’s tree bears good fruit or bad fruit? Besides, I’m mystified as to why our Leftist media, which bows at the altar of secularism, is so concerned about Mr. Obama’s religion? Unless they’re hoping to re-brand Christianity in Mr. Obama’s Marxist image.

[...]

For now my work here is finished. On the other hand, the work of God-haters who will viciously demagogue what I just wrote, without supplying any rational basis for their assertions there’s anything remotely Christian about Obama (thus proving my point), I’m sure is just beginning. Why the same Leftists who vehemently loathe Christianity want their progressive hero to be labeled a Christian is beyond me. Regardless, Jesus has a final word for them as well:

“Do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul, but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in Hell.” (Matthew 10:28)

Tom Shelly #racist niggermania.com

Personally, I do not hate niggers at all, I just correctly understand that they are not human and treat them accordingly. They are nothing more than wild niggers running around loose and one must act accordingly around them. A hundred and fifty years or so ago, people in this country treated niggers accordingly and kept them contained and controlled. We made them useful by managing their numbers, containing them, and forcing them to work and be somewhat productive. But the natural empathy of the White man caused him to unrestrain a species of animal (niggers) largely due to the fact they they mimick humans in their behavior and dress. Now that the genie is out of the bottle, he can't be put back in and we're stuck with living around 30 million wild niggers.

I am never surprised when I hear stories of TNB; stories of niggers raping, torturing, murdering and beating White people. Stories from Africa of them raping babies, toddlers, and goats; drinking lizard pee and smoking their own shit to get high. The rampant disease and famine there and watching their nigglets die off by the millions while their mammies get gang-banged in the bush to pump out another litter. Nothing about niggers surprises me at all because I do not compare their behavior with that of humans.

The only way to hate niggers and to justify the old, tired whigger accusation that racists are full of hate and spread hate and all that nonsense is only if you consider niggers human. It WOULD fill me up with hate and want to get revenge if a group of humans acted the same way niggers do and created so much misery, pain, and suffering in the world. But if you consider them as the animals that they are - a separate species from human - their actions do not surprise nor cause hate at all.

But it does fill me with a sense of bewilderment as to why we allow the nigger herd to run around completely unchecked and unmanaged. The destruction and drain on society they cause is appalling.

James Wilson #fundie fstdt.com

The birth control hormones are getting in the waters and feminazis are raising boys on Ritalin so they become effeminate beta male cucks subservient to the feminazi agenda of eradicating God's natural hierarchy where WOMEN CANNOT TEACH MEN ANYTHING AND MUST STAY IN THE HOME! It is obvious that Swift is all about female empowerment and it's appalling because Jesus Christ isn't that long hair hippie guy depicted by the papists! Jesus Christ is almighty and righteous and our men need to be MANLY IN CHRIST and stop trying to act all effeminate and subservient like these hipster autistic nerds with their ponies and hentai and beards and man buns and rompers and fake affinity for science! "Men" are even wearing eyeliner and women's perfume nowadays while dykes and other feminazis are trampling all over them in defiance of God's natural law!

Remy Tremblay #fundie eurocanadian.ca

The 60's were a time of change with Pope John XXIII calling the Second Vatican Council in order to modernize the Church. This had a devastating effect on Catholic Quebec. The leftist uprising of May 68 in France and the rise of the New Left in America also contributed to the destruction of the traditionalist way of life of French Canadians. Quebec went through its own Quiet Revolution, a revolution that changed our very nature. Today what is remembered is that most of our institutions (schools, hospitals, social services) were transferred from the Church to the government. If this secularization has had enormous effects on our society, the deepest change brought about by the Quiet Revolution was a redefining of our identity. The term French Canadian, an exclusive ethnic term, was transformed to Quebecois, an inclusive term encompassing anyone living in the territory of Quebec. While pre-60's nationalism was ethnic, religious and linguistic, with the promotion of strong links with outside of Quebec French Canadians, the neo-nationalism of the Quiet Revolution had become linguistic, civic and provincialist.

This neo-nationalism has become the norm nowadays, although ethnic nationalism is still very present, although only implicitly. While the media has adopted political correctness as its credo, some mainstream columnists like Mathieu Bock-Côté and Gilles Proulx openly advocate the defense of our ethnic identity and interests, something that is yet to be seen in the rest of Canada. In Quebec, multiculturalism is universally despised and is seen as a Canadian way to crush our people. The opposition to multiculturalism is so great that the Liberal government and pseudo-intellectuals Charles Taylor and Gérard Bouchard decided to invent our own form of diversity à la québécoise; interculturalism. Needless to say that interculturalism is an even worse model of society than multiculturalism, as it does not even allow our culture to exist as it is, but forces it to change and adapt to new immigrants.

Today a majority of Quebecers openly reject Islam. The announcement of the Liberal government about increased levels of immigration recently caused a public outcry. Pierre-Karl Péladeau, a charismatic leader who is closer to traditional nationalism than neo-nationalism, could awaken Quebec's underlying ethnic nationalism, but it is yet to be seen. Like in the rest of North America and Western Europe, political correctness is still very powerful and makes many adopt positions that clash with their own self-interests.

Caver #conspiracy rr-bb.com

Besides, for the record, I suspect we are already know to some governmental electronic data bank somewhere and probably categorized as to our type of communication. If we post much we'll be categorized as safe, fringe group religious fanatic but not a threat......at least not at first.

It would be interesting, now that I think of it. Monday nights are kind of special down here. Its Bible Study Fellowship (BSF) night. Right where I'm at there are 500 men from over 170 churches, and next door, there are 500 women. Down the road a touch is another one.....in fact, there's something like 11 in the area. The largest concentration and percentage of the population in the country that reads and studies their bible daily and goes to class once a week on it.

We'll be easy to catch, harder to hold on to and what a mess this town would be to operate without us showing up for work. Doctors, attorneys, police officers, teachers, district attorneys, engineers, pilots and aircraft mechanics, nurses, bank finance people......the nuts and bolts of what makes the city run. Maybe we'll have a chance to sway some of the huge number of "wrong color (red/blue)" voters before the next election provided this area quits acting like such a strong magnet pulling the "northern neighbors" down looking for cheap houses and high wages. Every walk of life is represented....doctors and dentists just arriving after getting out of surgery, politicians coming down from the state capital and business owners shutting down and coming to class. More than anyplace I have ever lived, faith is taken really seriously down here.

Another factor in the Obama color shift (blue to red) in the election came from the huge number of universities ... youth and liberal... in the area and sanctuary city Durham.

If nothing else, would be interesting to watch the attempt to get us rounded up and identified from just our screen name. Oh, I know it can be done, but it would be a bit confusing and entertaining.

ron4jesus #fundie rr-bb.com

I hope this explodes wide open and I know what will happen if he lied. I am prepared to deal with that but this is our country and the Constitution says he has to be a natural born citizen. OBAMA the Constitution is not flawed !!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE !!!!!!!!!!!!! If this is proven he lied I can't imagine what will happen but it will be bad BIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG TIME !!!!!!! I live near Chicago and what happens happens. No foreign born person is going to come and take the biggest job in this country and tear it all apart because he don't agree with our laws. In the back of my mind I wonder if this Obama personally knows Osama bin Laden and they planned this years ago. They can't beat us militarily but they can beat us within the country by picking a leader to dismantle America from within. I will never understand how our enemy are the Islam Fanatics who are bent on destroying us and we vote a Muslim man in who was also taught that evil religion. We must be nuts and the schools finally dumbed our kids down and some adults as well to believe this guy can do miracles with our problems here. This GUY is ANTI-GOD and ANTI-ISRAEL . ANTI everything else Christians are against. I think if he gets in they will have concentration camps soon for us. Instead of HITLER killing Jews it will be him killing Christians. It does say beheadings in the last days and what does ISLAM teach ? I will die for my GOD and will not deny him for death is GAIN. I can't wait to leave this filthy sewer world and the stench I smell in it. Christians will be his biggest problem if he gets in. I am just not sure how much GOD will let us see and be involved in before he gets us out of here. If I have to die then I will die, but will never deny my GOD and if by chance OBAMA reads this then come get me, I am ready for a brand new life but you will never see the life I will inherit OBAMA. I pray for your soul !!!!!!!!!!! OK I was preaching here for a minute sorry !!!!!

Katherine #fundie christiananswers.net

knew little about Pokemon. My first exposure was when my son won a Pokemon GameBoy. I let them watch the show. Then my 9 year old began to play and it was all he did. I became concerned and watched the show for myself. It was appalling. The boy was "possessed" (their word). He was levitating. An evil ghost was trying to take them away. Two of the older boys were becoming charmed by this ghost. The girl tried to scare the ghost away using various charms, garlic, etc, and finally pulled out a cross. I do not like the cross being on the same level as just another charm. It belittles what Jesus did for us. I threw the GameBoy cartridges in the burn barrel, much to the dismay of their classmates. I just could not in good conscience promote this by giving them away. It is not just a cartoon, and they ARE directly assaulting our children and beliefs. We are influenced by what we see. Just ask the advertisers.
--Katherine, age 45

Relic #fundie christianforums.net

Are you fighting the good fight to STOP those perverts from overrunning the schools where our children attended and now their children attend?
Are you for the gay movement to come in and take over your neighborhood, like they have done in parts of San Francisco and other neighborhood across the world with their vile gay pride parades and vulgar display of perversions in public, many times right in front of our innocent children?
Have you ever had to deal with a gay hedonistic exhibitionist?
What about those who are not gay but bring vulgarity by way of advertisements on huge billboards in your neighborhood?
Do you want your children to have to walk past some foul sexually explicit advertisement on their way to school everyday?

And you dare tell me to put my man pants on and I would feel better? For your information, I am NOT a man. I am a woman, a grown woman/grandmother, who is very concerned about what vulgarity the secular general public is allowing to be displayed in public view for everyone to see. How appalling is that to fight the good fight against the wicked? If they are not brought to the conviction of their sin by speaking out, it convicts, then how are we being used by not participating in the battle against the wicked whiles of the devil? To just go preach mushy type gospel is not what Jesus was all about! My God is not a God to just sit idle without using his servants to speak out against the wicked deeds of others. Nor does he not use his people to speak out against the wicked. He used Moses to speak out plenty! He used many many people to speak out to the wicked about their evil deeds. Don't tell me Michael Savage is in the wrong. He is not! There are plenty of scritpures in the bible that speak out against evil and call it for what it truly is. vile vulgar fornicators whores. there are plenty enough times in the bible where the sinner is called exactly what they are by name.

Anonymous Coward 70550610 #racist #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Why You Should FEAR Mongrel-Theism...!
Mongrel Theism being defined as the belief/delusion of Kalergi-ites, "Multiculturalism", & NWO stooges, goons, shills & dupes.

The Mongrels have the greatest Mass-Murder Body-Count of any group of people in recorded history.

Synopsis-

Body Counts For Mongrels Reach Into Tens-Of-Millions with speculations even higher...!

Mongrel Rule left behind few tangible artifacts -- like architecture or art.

They did leave behind tremendous piles of cadavers (corpses), and legendary stories of slaughter of men, women, children.

What of the incredible bloody legends that surround Mongrel Empire?

Their victims are counted in tens of millions, which probably was 20% of world population at the time.

Mongrels committed genocide everywhere they went from China to Russia to Khwarezm to Baghdad.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Speculation exists that Mongrels Genocided, and killed so many people, there was no-one left to farm and raise live-stock. The Mongrels being Nomadic degenerates did not have the skills, or desire to modify ("Their") behavior and maintain farm-lands,

Famine erupted many perished from starvation. (Similar to what is occurring now.)

Murderous conquests killed so many people that huge swathes of cultivated land returned to forest.

climate change/starvation may have forced them to cut their losses and stop their fearsome war of attrition.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ruthless tactics and hordes swept across Asia.

One territory after another fell under the overwhelming force of the Mongrels, which would eventually stretch from the eastern shores of China. A series of successful forays in Hungary and Poland made even Europe seem within reach of Mongrel Rule.

Mongrels invaded Greater India, Anatolia.

By 1240, Kiev had been sacked and the Mongrel horde was advancing west. Their cavalry and siege tactics were laying waste to the cities of Europe.

[Mongrel siege tactics were known as "Kharash" or "Kheresh"

Mongrels slaughtered an estimated 1 million Hungarians: Troops, clerics, nobles, knights, and peasants. It was one of the bloodiest defeats of the medieval period.

Everywhere they went they terrorized local populace, killing, exterminating, or moving entire people to other places.

Mongrels and Co. were more of a pack of hyenas than people.

“It was not rare for Mongrel armies to butcher tens of thousands of unarmed men, women, and children in captured towns and the neighboring countryside.

In this the Mongrel armies have had no peers. I mentioned the 1,747,000 people possibly killed in Nishapur.

In 1219 Mongrel army captured Bokhara and allegedly murdered 30,000; and another 30,000 people in capturing Samarkand.

In 1221 a Mongrel army seized Merv and reportedly took 13 days to slaughter 1,300,000 inhabitants.

Historians also record that in 1220 the Mongrels killed 50,000 in Kazvin after it was captured; 70,000 in Nessa, and a similar number in Sebzevar.

It is written that in 1221, the Mongrel Tului slew 700,000 to 1,300,000 people in Meru Chahjan, one of the four main cities of Khorassan in the Northern borderland of Persia. Upon capture the inhabitants were made to evacuate the city, a four-day task. Then they were distributed among the Mongrels and massacred.

It took 13 days to count corpses. Among those who hid from the massacre, 5,000 were killed by Mongrel detachments when they later emerged.

Also, the entire population of Rayy, a city with 3,000 mosques, was slaughtered.

Herat was later captured, but only some 12,000 soldiers and their dependents were killed. However, after the inhabitants later rebelled Mongrels angrily sent a general Noyan against them. The city was recaptured and it took a whole week to burn it down and murder its estimated 1,600,000 people. Many thousands escaped, but Noyan later sought and killed over 2,000 of them.

“Then in 1226-33 there was the nearly total extermination--truly a genocide--of the Tanguts and their kingdom of Hsi-Hsia in China (in the province of Kansu). The Tanguts would not supply horses or auxiliaries for Mongrels war against Khwarizmian.

This was insolence that could not be tolerated.

After winning the war he then turned with vengeance on the Tanguts. Stating - "If it means my death I will exterminate them!"

At his command and with sheer slaughter as its ultimate goal, the Tanguts were defeated in one battle after another and pursued.

According to a Mongrel Bard, "To escape the Mongrel sword, the inhabitants in vain hid in the mountains . . . or, if that were not possible, in caves.

Scarcely one or two in a hundred succeeded. The Fields were covered with human bones."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Total Annihilation/ genocide”

The population of Western Xia was estimated at 3 million

In September 1227, Emperor Mozhu surrendered to the Mongrels and was promptly executed.

The Mongrels then pillaged Yinchuan, slaughtered the city's population, plundered the imperial tombs west of the city, and completed the effective annihilation of the Western Xia state.

The Knights of Banjo Hollow #racist thekbh.org

Circumcised Rapists

Howdy folks. Now I gots to tell ya, a not often reported aspect of male emasculation is how it facilitates rape.

***For those of you who are squeamish please do not read any further***

Circumcision removes the movability and touchiness of a man's baby-makin' organ. That movability and touchiness makes it nearly impossible for a man to stick an unwilling woman, a butt, or anything else that is not naturally slimy. Heebies, North-African Negroes, Mud-slimes, South Koreans and some other smaller groups in other countries are rape-ready. Heebies, Negroes and Mudslimes have traditionally had trouble rapin so many wimmin, then boys, then goats with their touchy, sin-protected implements that they willinly cut off their self-diseased skin parts - then in further and more brutal acts of rapin', they done started to pre-cut these parts off from their baby boys and girls. The result has been that in much of Africa and the Middle-East today, men and wimmin are extremely horny creatures, bein' ever-frustrated in gettin a natural sensation they'll never get, messin around like fools with nothin but dry poles and holes with no lips or slime to ease the act - and the men are free to rape.

Now here's somethin real interestin. In prepucially-deprived South Africa men seem to think that rape is just normal, fine and OK [1], even if the woman is killed. In a survey of South African men, one-third of them thought that rape was hunky-dorey - and these are the men that admit so much [1]. Also worthy of note, their preferred target is mysogynist females (or "lesbians").

Strangely in the Kali-yuga, we have a mostly white-skinned (though Mongolian white-skinned) race which is pretending to be of the now Is-slime "House of Shem," or "shemites." In pretendin to be what is a generally lowly race of goat and camel eaters who leaves desolation wherever they goes, somewhere in the seventh century they picked up on this idea of genital mutilatin as their preferred form of self hatred and misandry. Within this group of Jews, rape, humiliation, mutilation and torture is passed down from generation to generation of men. Several men of the Jewish persuasion (in spite of their incredible worldy riches) still manage to be the highlights of major rape cases, organized misopedia rings, bestiality and so on.

A good place to start for looking into rape and its causes is Jews, because Jews have had for centuries an organized system of genital mutilation and have been well-known for rape, misopedia, and even mutilation murders. Traditionally either being gypsy-type theives and beggars in ghettos or being money masters and slave owners, Jews have a long tradition of raping their slaves (as Thomas Jefferson and other founding forgers did). You can check out your local genital mutilators through these listings [1] [2] [3] [4] and be sure to steer clear. There is also more specifics on these clean cut perverts and how they like sucking baby penis blood [1] [2]. There's also a lot more on clean-cut killers hackin up babies [1]. In more recent news, clean-cut billionare/misopede Jeffery Epstein buys and rapes children, and his clean-cut lawyer gets him off scott-free.

Seein that most rape is organized, the quickest way to reduce rape in the world would be to arrest those in the organization. The first place would be to arrest, kill or otherwise permanantly isolate mohels. Jews being a minority in society, us White folk have let down Jews by givin into their devilish temptations and not takin up the throne of morality and enforcin the laws of God in our lands. If Jews were forced to stop mutilatin their boys like under the Greek Emperor Antiochus the Fourth, a substantial portion of Jews would grow up with normal bodies, normal passions, and normal inhibitions. This would revolutionize and refresh the Jewish people and give them much-needed credibility when taking on leadership positions in the world.

Current efforts to save Africans from razor rape is only for girls. And through the malice of Jews like Bill Gates and Steven Lewis, more of our African boys are bein razor raped and prepared to start doin the deed themselves.


*****The KBH*****

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Group of Hellenic Re-establishment (G.H.REES).

End star wars—Stop WWIII.

Ultra urgent message of planetary security

Special responsibilities for the Russian government

To the government members of all nations , U.N/O.N.U member states, via their embassies in Greece.

Athens, 13/5/2016, G.H.REES prytaneum/headquarters.

Subject: Receipt of astrostrategics information transmitted to planet earth from the forces of the four (4) outer planets of the solar system to the governments of planet earth, all under command of mutinous space forces in the inner planets of our solar system (666, 777, 888).

Sirs,

See below a summary of the information transmitted from the forces in the four outer planets via “ heavy, slow neutrino transmitters” in the vicinity of planet Saturn, and received by “ heavy, slow neutrino receivers” of the “space search division” of G.H.REES in the city of Patras, Greece.
You may deliver this summary of information to your specialised university staff for further analysis, as you, as politicians , are incapable of doing so due to a lack of specialized knowledge.
We add that it is likely that these heavy , slow neutrino transmissions were made possible through concentrated radiation neutrino-naser transmitters , since the above transmissions took place with an acute angle of transmission , arriving on planet earth with a 2,000 km radius. We give you summaries of the above transmissions , with prefixes depending on the case:

A). Prehistory of inner galactic astrostrategics: Mutiny in four constellations, that is, 4 left-turning solar systems in the vicinity of our local galaxy, with the constellation of DRACO (A’DRACONIS) leading this initial mutiny 70,000,000 years ago ,against the interstellar galactic government of the constellation of ANDROMEDA.

B).Cause for this mutiny was the excessive extraction of energy from radioactive metals on their planets , forbidden by the legislation of the government of Andromeda. Such energy extraction is also forbidden as it can cause destabilization of “ matter-energy dimensions” above and below the dimensions of “zero point” , thus causing “infiltration” of the “ matter-energy” dimensions.

C). Attacks of space vessels , “war planets”, of the four mutinous constellations against planets in other constellations for the stealing of radioactive metals and other natural resources, which stealing is strictly forbidden by the government of the constellation of Andromeda , ruling over approximately 70 billion solar systems in the local galaxy. This number is only a fraction of the 200 billion solar systems in our galaxy, ruled by a government of “ greatest matter inspissation” , and by the “ central government of inspissation-rarification of our galaxy”.

D). Raiding space vessels of the constellation of DRACO arrived in our solar system, originally inhabited by the black race originating from the star system of SIRIUS as the central solar system of 13 solar systems. Through genetic engineering , these hostile draconian spaceships spawned and spread across our planet the draconian yellow race ( pre-historic Chinese), and the draconian fauna (reptiles ,dinosaurs) and flora (cacti). Their main target was the extermination of the anthropoid black Sirian race , the local Sirian flora and fauna, leading to the desertification and destruction of the planet, so that stealing the planet’s natural resources and radioactive meterials would be made easier. The above attempt to steal the planet’s natural resources and radioactive metals took place 65,000,000 years ago . The galactic government of the “ constellation of Andromeda” dispatched to planet earth combat space vessels , which ousted the draconian populations (chinese) and exterminated the dinosaurs.

E). More raiding by bandit spaceships of the mutinous constellation of DRACO took place 20,000 earth years ago, led by the so-called “invincible war planet LEVAN-LEVANHIAH “ or “SELENE-MOON” ,flagship of the draconian astrofleet. This MOON flagship made its first unsuccessful attempt to go into orbit around planet earth 20,000 earth years ago, however its second attempt was successful and was put in orbit 13,500 earth years ago. Due to the abnormal, unnatural increased mass concentration of the MOON+EARTH “duo” , our planet is constantly going into a shrinking, spiraling orbit towards the sun, rather than the normal, natural expanding orbit of all heavenly bodies in the universe. This shrinking orbit will eventually cause earth to eventually crash into our sun in the distant future.

F). The 27-member (24+3) draconian government of the flagship Moon-Selene-Levan landed the first genetically engineered Chinese populations on the white pelasgian continent of ATLANTIS . The andromedian forces present on our planet at the time successfully warded off a draconian-atlantian invasion attempt of the continent of Aigis and Europe, at which point the draconian MOON used its hyper-gravity technology to bring about the destruction and sinking of Atlantis and Aigis (today’s Mediterranean sea). The Chinese atlantean populations moved to the territories of today’s China.Following that, the draconian bandits of the “MOON” provoked civil wars within the white andromedian race and genocides of the white andromedian populations by hordes of white-yellow Mongols or Touranian crossbreeds. These wars ,all of them conceived by the lunar draconians , were caused primarily on account of religious differences within the white andromedian races . The prime target of the draconians is (was, from now on), to rule over the four(4) outer planets and beyond , over the star system of Sirius as the “coccyx” of the Universal Organism ,and thus an area of utmost importance for the entire Universal Organism , so that they could blackmail from there billions of inhabited planets in the universe.

G). Following two world wars on our planet (1914,1940), both planned by the draconian leaders of the flagship MOON via draconian “demons” who gave orders to the Saxon and Hebrew lodges , lunar draconians, led by draconian Lord Dragon Sin-Sion-Sina-Jedi-Jade-Jed-Jude-Jehova, have masterplanned the outbreak of WWIII led by Chinese “HONG” as the supreme hyper-lodge of the planet and above ALL other lodges of the East and West. Through WWIII, the lunar draconians intend to genocide 5 billion people of the white and indigenous black races , white-yellow Touranian race, and black-yellow races in the B’ and C’ phase of WWIII . During the A’ phase of WWIII, the lunar draconians have planned a war conflict between the two trilateral adversaries of US.E.J (USA, EUROPE,JAPAN), against R.I.C (RUSSIA, SIITIC ISLAM, CHINA). As for the end of WWIII, the lunar draconians have planned the survival of ONLY the Chinese and Korean populations , as the only pure yellow draconian populations of planet earth.
Contrary to paragraphs A),B),C), D),and E), containing information given to G.H.REES by the andromedians in the vicinity of planet Saturn, paragraph F) contains a mix of information given by the andromedians of Saturn and G.H.REES research , while paragraph G) only contains G.H.REES research information.

H). The above research information from G.H.REES was transmitted via heavy neutrino (neutrino-naser) G.H.REES transmitters to planet Saturn, where it was received by the andromedian forces stationed there. These andromedian forces of the galactic government andromedian astrofleet , bearing in mind G.H.REES ‘s research information , are notifying ALL governments of planet earth via the following ultimatum:

“Any governments of planet earth that will carry out the planned WWIII on the planet , will be annihilated without being allowed the slightest chance of survival through “ acts of expiation”, according to the laws and legislation of the government of the “constellation of Andromeda” .(see ancient Greek law). Likewise, not only will Touranian-Mongolian governments and the draconian governments of China , and North and South Korea be excluded from “acts of expiation”, but also the populations of these Touranian-Mongolian and draconian nations should WWIII break out. This translates into a mass extermination of the populations of these Touranian-Mongolian and draconian nations, in case the planned lunar draconian WWIII breaks out between the axes of US.E.J and R.I.C.

Jews, Saxons, Albanians, Bulgarians, a number of Turks/Hungarians/Romanians, Fins,other Mongols of Eurasia and a number of Islamic nations are all of Touranian-Mongolian descent , that is, a white-yellow crossbreed.
The Andromedian forces in the four (4) outer planets , arrived there in mass numbers after the earth year 2000 (A.D= after draconian medium-Rabbi “Jesus or Jehosouva Christ”), are calling upon the members of the Touranian governments and Touranian –Mongolian populations of planet earth, to take the side of the white andromedian race , that is the white blood of their white-yellow crossbreed, against the yellow side of their crossbreed, if they wish to survive peacefully on planet earth through “acts of expiation” according to the galactic law. This is because the pure yellow draconian populations of China and North and South Korea will be expelled from planet earth and taken to another solar system by the andromedian space forces , even if they manage to survive by accepting to commit “acts of expiation”.

I). Since earth year 2000 A.D , the combat division of the andromedian starfleet arrived at the orbits of planet Saturn has been negotiating with the draconian forces of the MOON for the unconditional surrender of the draconian forces occupying the inner planets of our solar system . Following the ultimate surrender of the MOON and its escorting by andromedian ships safely out of our solar system , the now shrinking orbits of the planets will begin to expand naturally , through use of “space engineering” so as to stabilize these orbits of the planets of our solar system , and to reverse the now shrinking orbits and their ultimate impact with our sun. G.H.REES asked for more details of the above mission and negotiations but was turned down on account of “ confidentiality of negotiations”.

G.H.REES’s Neutrino-Nasar receivers ( neutrino amplified stimulated absorption radiation) of the space research division of G.H.REES in the city of Patras , Greece, received the following clarification-command only, that is: “ In case the Draconian forces ultimately agree to an unconditional surrender and a lifetime commitment of “acts of expiation” in a different solar system , according to galactic laws, it is forbidden that any court sentence or legal actions be taken against them for the crimes they have committed”. The same will apply to the Touranian and Mongolian governments and populations of planet earth , should they wish to commit similar “acts of expiation” according to the galactic universal law, after giving up committing crimes of the galactic penal code.

J). WWI and WWII are also included in the above crimes, with WWIII still at its starting phase, falsely attributed to a religious war and starting with a provoked attack of the “antichrist West (US.E.J) 666”, against “Christian Korea 777” and “Christian China 888” after 2023.
All of the above false ideologies pertaining to “ Antichrist 666” and “ Christian 777 and 888”, were conceived by the lunar draconian forces , with the aim of genociding the white andromedian race of planet earth by the counterattacking forces of “R.I.C-777-888” against “US.E.J-666”. Only the pure draconian populations of China 888 and the two Koreas 777 are to survive this genocide.

K). The space research division of G.H.REES at Patras, Greece, informed the andromedian forces at planet Saturn that the lunar draconian forces as well as the forces of the Cronian andromedian mutineers (andromedian traitors who betrayed the galactic government of Andromeda and joined forces with the draconians of the MOON) , have planned a fake “ arrival of andromedian forces” on planet earth. During this fake arrival, it has been planned that the mutinous saturnian (cronian) forces will pose as the true andromedians , so as to deceive the armed forces of “ U.S.E.J-666” and drag them to a world war against the armies of “ R.I.C -777-888”. These fake saturnian forces posing as the true andromedians will also commit “war crimes” and “ crimes against humanity” against the armies and populations of “R.I.C” so that counterattacking “R.I.C” will ultimately genocide the unarmed civilians of “US.E.J”.
The andromedian forces at Saturn replied to G.H.REES that: “ Even the saturnian traitors and other andromedian mutineers will be allowed to commit “acts of expiation” , if they so wish, and manage to survive not in our solar system but rather in the constellation of Andromeda.

L). Particular responsibility rests with the Russian government : Although Christianity is a Hebrew cult (both these religions ,along with Islamism, were conceived by the lunar draconian forces), and although the members of the Russian government are Touranian Israelites, the predominant Christian tendency among the Russian people is still able to intercept the degradation and corruption brought about by the Touranian Hebrews and and Saxons within the white race nations of “US.E.J.”. We call upon the Russian government to act accordingly , in order for these actions to be deemed “acts of expiation” for the survival of Touranian populations of planet earth.

M). Meanwhile , we call upon the Chinese hyper-government of “HONG” , as well as the hyper-government of the West of the Touranian Hebrewsaxons of “AOA” and “ OTO” in London, the Hebrewsaxon governments of the “USA” and “ E.E” , and the Touranian governments of the Balkans and Eurasia, to immediately cancel the planned enslavement of the white andromedian Hellenes so the blackmailed Hellenes will accept the setting up of “ the empire of Constantinople 666” and the political-military leadership of this “Greek empire 666” of “ US.E.J” , for a military assault of “NATO “ and “SEATO” against “R.I.C” . This assault against “RIC” will cause the counterattack of “R.I.C” and the genocide of white race populations of “US.E.J” , with the Greeks the first up for genocide. Because execution of the above evil planning by the lunar draconian forces will “ result in irrevocable death penalties and exclusion from any possible means of survival via “acts of expiation” against ALL draconian and Touranian governments and populations of the planet”. That is the warning of the andromedian forces of Saturn.

That’s all for the time being….

On behalf of G.H.REES,
Karageorgiou Cr.Cr. Giannis, G.HREES representative
National and planetary security general of G.H.REES
12 Elpidos str, Nea Ionia , Volos, Greece.
Tel: [removed by submitter]
================

RELEVANT DOCUMENTS AND LINKS:

The Chinese-eyed dragon-turtle agent of "HONG" commands: "Let Greece go bankrupt"
(European Union taking orders from Dragonian China. Trilateral Axis US-E-J , USA - EUROPE - JAPAN)
GOOGLE IT!!!

"The convention for the future of Europe has ended with a show of a rapid rhetoric. The president of the convention, mister Valery Giscard d'Estaing closed the last meeting with a last minute changes to the first draft of the European constitution, adding providence for an official EU flag, one anthem, one anniversary and one slogan.
But (Giscard) kept his last word for the Wu Kei (comment: You may call the statue EL SENDAI-JEDI-GENOCIDOFAGGOTI), a turtle with a dragon head, something that mr. Giscard placed on his desk throughout every meeting.
(Giscard's statement was:)
"The last person I would like to thank is my Wu Kei turtle. It followed us and led us throughout our entire journey. When we were in the middle of the river, it guided us, just as it did for the first Chinese emperors, until we finally reached the river shore. And I expect, just as many of you do also, that from the early beginning, it knew whereof wanted to take us" (!)
Meanwhile, mr. Giscard took some lettuce leaves and offered them to the turtle statue. The turtle didn't say anything."

================

P.S.2: We present to you the Geostrategic Mathematical Codes which has elaborated and assigned the Chinese Masonic Hyper-lodge “HONG” in the below Geostrategic Axles which, without exception, were founded by “HONG” in order to design and to conduct the World War III, and in order to genocide the 2/3rds, namely 5 billion of all terrestrial races of the planet, from the pure Draconians – Yellow armies of China and of United Korea._ The Geostrategic Codes were cross-verified from Electronic eavesdropping executed by passive “Neutrino Receivers” of G.H.REES (technology) over sessions of masonic lodges of Hong-Kong, of Shanghai, of “AOA” – “Ordo Adeptis Atlantis” London, and over the environment of the “Planetary King of Israel”, arch-Rabbi Baruch or Barowghs of “USA”._

1): 666/A: US.E.J., USA – Europe – Japan._

2): 666/B: T.I.M., Tibet – India – Mongolia._

3): 777/A: North Korea._

4): 777/B: South Korea._

5): 888:A(+): R.I.C., Russia – Islam – China._

6): 888/B(+): C.J.T.H.S.M., China – Japan – Tibet – Hebrews – Saxons – Mongolia._

7): 888/C(+): C.K., China – Korea._

8): 888/C(-): J.T.H.S.M., Japan – Tibet – Hebrews – Saxons – Mongolia._

9): 888/B(-): Whites of Russia and Islamic States._

10): 888/A(-): Black Race nations._

The Mathematical signs (+) and (-) mean that the Geostrategic axis 888/B(+) has been designed to genocide the semi-axis 888/B(-) of Russia and Islamic States, and that the axis 888/C(+) of China and Korea has been designed to genocide the semi-axis 888/C(-) Japan – Tibet – Hebrews – Saxons – Mongolia, namely in order to genocide all the Hebrews and the Saxons of the Planet, as “not pure Yellow”, namely as Mongols White-Yellow._

The above means that the Chinese “HONG” has programmed to genocide the White populations of Russia with code 888/B(-), and the Hebrews and the rest Mongols of Russia with code 888/C(-). Therefore, withdraw immediately from “PACT OF SHANGHAI”, and abort immediately the supply of weapons and high technology, oil, natural gas, and space technology towards China and towards the two Korean states.

We (finally) present to you the fronts of the 1st phase of World War III, as those have being programmed from “HONG” of China, from “AOA” London, and from the arch-Rabbis Baruch of “USA”:

3rd W.W. “COSMIC ETNA” 2012

666/A
666/B
777/B

Versus

777/A
888/A
and remnants of the armies of “B.A.S.T./R.” Bulgaria – Albania – Skopje – Turkey – Romania – that will seek refuge in China territories.

================

DRACONIAN (CHINESE) SCHEME ARMAGEDDON
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

The silent genocide!!!
10.000 suicides in Greece from the begining of the crisis (2009) not announced by the mainstream media
GOOGLE IT!!

MASER - MASAR directed-energy technology weapons of G.H.REES
(note: This is the simplified version of the NETRINO - NASER strategic supremacy technology of G.H.REES)
GREEK ELLHN KAI CHAOS 2 BLOG - GOOGLE IT!

FROM THE ORBIT OF PLANET SATURN INTERPLANETARY SIGNAL OF PLANETARY SECURITY TOWARDS PLANET EARTH
(Year 2010 Document)
GOOGLE IT!!!

Rev. Austin Miles #conspiracy renewamerica.com

Obama is not clinically insane but has been specifically programmed by his Communist handlers along with his Muslim allies to take America over the cliff. He is not dumb but a very useful idiot for the Communist Party ( Josef Stalin's description for those who help his cause). Obama is totally controlled as an authentic Manchurian Candidate.

Obama's importance to The Party is that he is the one tool created by the Communist Party to destroy America, the last country standing in the way of a Marxist-led One World Order. He was the handpicked candidate to bringing America down. This is precisely why he is he so important in history and remains so calm and poised in all situations.

Obama and the Party have conducted many rehearsals to prepare for the take-over which will be accomplished in the early part of November 2016. The first rehearsal was when the Communists and Muslims, who had deftly shoehorned their way into government offices by deceit and voter fraud, put him the Oval Office. He would not show his birth certificate, or any information about his real identity including his educational records which shows conclusively that he was here on a foreign student visa. All of that was sealed. With enough supportive power from those who had been slipped into government, all remained silent.

The rehearsal was to determine if the Congress, Senate, Speaker of The House or Sgt. At-Arms would have him removed. Those spineless jelly fish sat quietly with no questions or hearings.

The next rehearsal was to see if Obama could make Marxist statements with his exact intentions with no push back reaction. Check: Rehearsal Went Well.

The final rehearsal will be the early part of November, 2016 when Obama intends to use Executive Order to declare himself president (dictator) for life.

The current powerful push to take guns away from all citizens is underway. This way the citizens can no longer defend their family's homes and property from armed invaders.

An Associated Press story today (5/10/15) has the headline: "Hundreds Rally for Gun Control" which is set in New York City. Leaders say it is absolutely necessary, that guns be outlawed. To do so now, they say, will protect us all from mass-killings (Columbine Aurora Theater, Connecticut School, Stockton, etc.) Yes, Outlawing gun ownership will stop this madness. Really?

This would mean that the only people who would have guns would be the murderers, thieves and dictators. There is no way they would obey the law to turn in their guns. What an advantage this would offer them! Then we would really be fish in a barrel.

And who is pushing this gun grab in New York? It is New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, who is a known active communist who is fanning the flames of racial tension to divide America and has worked against the police.

First of all, I am convinced that these mass killings were purposely orchestrated for this very purpose, to disarm all Americans to retard resistance. Notice how the mentally ill (or just disturbed) perpetrated these shootings. They could easily be brainwashed into carrying out such deeds that would prove a point about private gun ownership and the threat to all families as a result. Then when Obama makes his move in 2016, he can waltz to the throne with no push back.

Paul Bury #fundie #conspiracy #homophobia familyfriendlygaming.com

Family Friendly Gaming, the industry leader in covering the family friendly video games is continuing our requested series on the DARK SIDE OF GAMING. This article is on the reality that Nintendo DOES NOT WANT YOUR MONEY. Does that reality confuse you? Do you immediately disagree with that statement? I personally cannot believe this is the truth. Sadly it is my experience. Back in May of 2014 Family Friendly Gaming exposed Nintendo’s ugly side in Nintendo Attacks Marriage. Right after that award winning article shined the light of truth on the nastiness of Nintendo black listed Family Friendly Gaming. They showed how petty and small minded they are.

This should not really surprise anyone in the video game industry. Nintendo has always been corrupt demanding positive reviews, and articles to make them money. They discriminate against real journalists and are only nice to those that kiss their behinds. Nintendo wants to control the narrative hence the Nintendo Directs. I remembering gaming magazines like EGM having issues with Nintendo decades ago. Their swamp of corruption attitudes have been around for a long time. This inability to get along with diverse cultures is a black eye on Nintendo. One that continues to this day. I find it sad because I am willing to work with them knowing they are openly embracing rebellion against God. I can be the bigger person and have open and honest dialogue. Their arrogance and fat heads show the kind of closed minded bigots they really are. Their long history of discriminating against Christians has been well documented over the decades. Family Friendly Gaming is just another example.

I continue to reach out to Nintendo. It continues to be a one sided dialogue. They ignore emails, letters, and phone calls. The last time I tried to call they would not even let me talk to anyone there. The person I talked to admitted Nintendo wants no sales from our 9.1 million readers. They actually acknowledged they want all ya’ll to stop buying their products and to never buy them ever again. I was shocked that they agreed they want none of your money ever again. Will you respect their wishes? I am shocked they are so hateful of Christians that they want no sales from us ever again. Being petty and small minded is one thing. Being this hateful for six years is a completely different story. I find their hate to be so disgusting.

I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day.


God bless,
Paul Bury
Emperor
Family Friendly Gaming

Madoc #fundie starshipmodeler.net

Folks,

One of the best explanations of the differences in Christianity's handling of Old Testament vs. New Testament was that Jesus marks the difference. It was his arrival and his "dying for your sins" which changed things. It was that assumption of those sins that allowed the New Testament to build on the good things of the Old Testament while setting aside the excesses of the Old.

You also would be very hard pressed to find any denomination of Christians which still practice only the Old Testament ways. Very hard pressed.

Plus, Western Civilization has figured out how to handle religion in the midst of a modern and otherwise secular society. It took a while for it to do so but we've done much better hewing to that "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's" principle. It also helps - a lot - that the main religion of Western Civilization, Christianity, is inherently a hierarchical thing. Thus, there is a central point from which reforms can be applied and adhered to.

Over the centuries this has caused schisms in the faith but, even there, the various Christian sects are also hierarchical. This also has helped to limit the "downsides" of Christianity.

There is not any such thing with Islam. Islam is inherently a non-hierarchical religion. Oh, it has "elders" and experts on interpreting Islamic doctrine and dogma but their authority is purely a voluntary thing. That is, any Muslim is free to adhere or ignore the fatwahs of any particular Islamic cleric.

That means that reform is an exceptionally difficult thing to apply in Islam.

Also, the Islamic world has never gone through its version of Christianity's "Wars of Reformation" which drove home the need for separation of church and state. Thus the secular and sectarian are still very much mixed in the Islamic world as opposed to officially, legally, and culturally separate as they are in the Christian world.

So, when you get some charismatic political leader in the Islamic world he's also able to wield the absolutism that comes with religion. We've learned in the West how nasty that can spin out of control. The Muslim world is continually proving that point.

Anyway, this is why it's an exercise in futility - at the least - to try picking out the nasty things in the Old Testament and attempting to use them to shut down criticisms of Islam. The two are not equal. The Old Testament is not in practice in Christianity - only the New Testament is. In the Islamic world, everything in the Koran is viewed as current and applicable.

As to how nice and un-radical are the Muslims some folks keep referring to - note their locations. The ones who are that way are almost all in the West. And they're here for a reason. Namely, their moderation would get them dead were they still back in the Middle East. And the longer they stay amongst the secular West the more moderate they get. With exceptions, sadly.

So pointing out how nice and un-radical those Western Muslims are is pretty much irrelevant when compared to how things are in the Middle East.

I also gotta say that too many people seem hell bent on ignoring the threat of Islamist jihadis. And they keep doing so on an appallingly regular basis.

Some new horrible Islamist attack is perpetrated by some new band of jihadis and their first reaction is to shrill their sorrow and weep for the slaughtered. This usually takes the form of quickly creating a heart rendering #Hastag to denote their feelings and then also generating some tear inducing image to overlay on their Facebook profile picture.

Within days - in some cases, hours - they'll then crank out the same tired old rationalizations to enable them to run away from actually dealing with the issue.

The latest terror attack by Islamist jihadist fanatics thus somehow becomes OUR fault. The attackers thus somehow become VICTIMS themselves. And we should refrain from using violence in our response as that will only create more terrorists in the future. Oh, and the self-professed Islamist jihadis who perpetrated the attack are not, in fact, Islamists at all.

It's like they're all reading from the same script or something.

This then allows them to blame the West and demand no real long term solution be meted out. And they then merrily go back to their normal lives happy in the knowledge that they are oh-so-morally superior for having such an "enlightened" world view.

Until the next horror rendered out by the next bunch of radical Islamist jihadis.

Andrew Hamilton #racist counter-currents.com

The idea of racial dominance was advanced by WASP physical anthropologist Carleton Coon, professor at Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania

...

My dog was dominant in the sense described by Coon. Every time he interacted with strange dogs, regardless of breed, he would assume a menacing air and the other dogs would immediately submit, lowering themselves and making a whimpering sound. I never observed an instance where this did not occur.

A similar dominance-docility relation exists between Jews and whites. Whites are submissive—embarrassingly so. There is also a strange—frankly, disgusting—sado-masochistic component, with Jews the hate-filled sadists and whites the adoring masochists.

...

Though Jews are dominant over whites, we are superior. As William Pierce noted, our race does an overall better job excelling in every field of endeavor: literature, engineering, painting and sculpture, astronomy, building cities and roads, and exploring new lands.

Though Jewish dominance is visible in face-to-face exchanges, it is especially noticeable in the social, cultural, ideological, and institutional realms. In any assemblage or organization, Jews, given sufficient numbers and time—they can work ceaselessly for specific objectives over much longer time periods (generations, even) than whites—will get their collective way on matters of importance to them. This is true in entire societies as well.

We might say that population dominance is achieved through control of culture. A dominant race creates and shapes the social, psychological, and behavioral environment to which subject races must adapt. The dominant group creates an environment, a culture, advantageous to its members but exploitative of and maladaptive to subordinate races. Jews have gone so far as to strive for the extinction of whites, despite formulating the laws that made genocide an international crime against humanity. They routinely ignore and violate law whenever it suits their purpose.

...

It seems possible that the Ashkenazim represent a particularly virulent strain . . . which is saying a lot. They are driven by a burning hatred no Gentile can fully comprehend. (Strangely, most Gentiles remain completely oblivious to it even when it strikes them in the face.)

...

Once one race successfully asserts its dominance over another, it distorts the normal cultural and biological processes of the lower group. A socialization process alters the latter’s leadership cadre. Natural leaders are deemed inimical to the interests of the ruling class and are eliminated—even murdered at times, as Pizarro murdered the Inca emperor Atahualpa or the Communists massacred the Polish Officer Corps in 1940—while the fortunes of ambitious, sufficiently talented and energetic individuals willing to work against the vital interests of their own people are advanced.

As a result, Gentiles worldwide have fallen victim to the exteriorization of the closed, narrow-minded, bigoted, bitter, hateful, violent, criminal, dogmatic, intolerant, superstitious, filthy mentality of the shtetl, ghetto, and synagogue.

One far-reaching difference between Jewish rule and white rule, despite the careless use of the word “genocide,” is that whites never intended to physically exterminate native peoples. If that had been their goal, the subject races would no longer exist. (Some demographically small subpopulations did disappear.)

Instead, non-white races grew quickly, at least until recently, when modern techniques of population reduction were imposed on a global scale through so-called “birth control” and “family planning” measures. But this was done under Jewish auspices, not white, because we were no longer in command of our own destiny, never mind anybody else’s.

Yet Jews, drunk on the self-generated fury of their socially-constructed Holocaust religion, do have the intention of committing genocide.

Any meaningful effort to stop them must take racial dominance into account and devise methods to successfully thwart and overcome it. This means identifying pressure points and unique vulnerabilities, as well as strengths, in both races and targeting or compensating for them respectively. It is a practical problem requiring imaginative solutions.

One precept entailed by dominance analysis is that it is vital to correctly identify and confront the Main Enemy in order to solve our racial problems (independence and survival). Conceptually speaking, that is no small contribution. Blacks, Mestizos, Arabs, and Asians are all secondary. As William Pierce stated, we are heading for extinction because Jews are paralyzing our will and ability to resist annihilation. In an environment without Jews, “We can whip every other race with both hands tied behind our backs. . . . . We must do something about the Jews—soon. And clearly the key to getting the Jews off our backs is to regain control of our mass media.”

Germany briefly demonstrated that successful opposition to Jews by whites might be possible, as did Spain and Portugal in the 15th century. As the second most dominant race on earth, whites are in a better position than anyone else to halt the destructive process. First, though, we must marshal the determination and ingenuity to do so.

Elizabeth Levesque #fundie blogs.telegraph.co.uk

Hitler was a murderer. Just like his Father. The Devil. Try to spin it any old way Terence. Christian and Hitler don't go together. You Atheists will lie about anything anywhere to denigrate the Christian faith AND you will line any group up and shoot them dead. For a generous fee or for fun. When push comes to shove we know who will be facing the end of a barrel. Jews. Gypsies. Children. Buddhists Monks. It's all their in history dude. Read up. Then fall into your required patsy place. Cause you people have no regard for human life. At all. You can be bought off with the ease of someone promising you a place in the top echelon of power. You are easily seduced by power. But when they have used you to do their dirty work they will turn on you. History reveals one patsy atheist after another doing Hitler's work until he jumped ship to save his skin. Narcissistic self preservation. Ya see dude. Us Christians. We get in line with the Jews and the Gypsies. WE take the first bullet. And the second. Something you would never do. YOu hear the word "Christian" and you reload. These are indisputable historic facts and if you don't like them then tough. They are real. If you don't like them then stop calling yourself an atheist. call yourself a dog. they at least have some semblance of honor.

Peter LaBarbera #fundie americansfortruth.com

Meghan McCain, the Senator’s daughter, seems to make much of the fact that she’s 24, as if that alone somehow validates her opinions, even on timeless moral truths like the sanctity of marriage. So I posted these questions to Meghan McCain on my Facebook page:

What gives your generation (Gen Y) the right to change God’s transcendent moral code by radically redefining the institution of marriage? What new insights on the morality of homosexuality led you to contradict the thousands of years of Biblical understanding on this point?

Later we’ll discuss why Meghan is not a good role model for young people insofar as her brand of “open-minded Christianity” has no basis in Scripture and jettisons the wisdom of the past. Here’s a theoretical pondering of Meghan on God’s created ordering of the sexes: “OK, God, I know you … like… created man and woman and everything and I’m totally into the Bible, but, ya know, since I’m 24 and I’m like … so in tune with the young people of this country and what they’re thinking … ya know … we think if two people love each other … it’s like — what’s-the-big-deal … I mean — why shouldn’t they be able to get married?! That’s not fair!”

Matt Marriott #conspiracy global-genocide.blogspot.co.uk

Abortion vs "Euthanasia"
Abortion became the first and so far only genocide where a "millions" death toll is became official while it's ongoing.
The termination of elderly and sick in care homes and hospitals: Unlike for abortion, that started decades earlier, there's still not a word in the dictionary for the second ongoing type of genocide in the EU and US.
This is explained by the second difference between both: unlike for abortion less than 0,00001% of the killings are declared.
The solution to cover-up this type of final solution: this time not gas ovens to reduce bodies to smoke and ashes but rather to simply declare murders as deaths by natural causes.
It started decades after abortion but still before this millenium.
For simplicity it will be referred to as "euthanasia", the word used for the mentioned less than 0,00001% of declared cases.

"Euthanasia" same basic type of genocide as the Holocaust not as abortion
Hospitals used as slaugherhouse connects "euthanasia" and abortion.
70 million "euthanized" in the US and EU in this millenium alone: getting close to the 3 digits of abortion and always more far away from the Holocaust's single digit.
But make no mistake:
Abortion was "only" organized and supervised but not carried out by the illuminazi secret society: the mothers are ultimately the perpetrators.
On the other hand both "euthanasia" now and the Holocaust 70 years earlier were executed by the illuminati.
And yet another parallel:

The most important fact of End Times: the Beast dehumanized billions of people to have them finally accept its mark
The point of no return for humans: the reduction to beasts.
Acceptance of Genocide played a key role in this process.
The Beast used psy-ops dehumanizing its victims to carrry on genocide without being disturbed.
Paradoxically the ultimate type of such psy-ops are previous genocides.

Previous Genocide is the most important psy-op to set the stage for the next
One of the consequences once almost everyone accepted the mark: "Euthanasia" becomes possible: millions murdered year after and now approaching 100 million.
Acceptance of abortion was the main psy-op setting the stage for "euthanizing" 70 million elderly and sick in the US and EU and in this millenium alone.
The same 75 years ago. Just replace "euthanasia" with holocaust and abortion with [A _ _ _ _ _ _ N ] genocide.
Home work: try to solve the riddle before reading the next section.

[A _ _ _ _ _ _ N ] genocide was the most important psy-op setting the stage for the Holocaust.
No wonder that the ongoing genocide previously referred to as "euthanasia" doesn't have a name: it isn't mentioned by mass media, same as the Holocaust while it was being carried out.
On the other hand the main psy-op used to set the stage for "euthanasia" has a name: abortion.
75 years ago another genocide played a key role setting the stage for the holocaust.
Unlike the Holocaust
- it was not directly executed by the illuminati.
- didn't require rewriting History books (ongoing now for the Holocaust) to deny one of its basic facts.
On the other hand, the reason for that difference gives two basic facts that it has in common with the Holocaust:
- it was planned and supervised by the illuminazis.
- this basic fact never appeared in History Books to start with. The same goes for one of the basic facts about the Holocaust, yet obviously a different one: the US and UK governments played a main role in organizing the Holocaust.

If you're still confused: fulfilling their anti-Bible, the illuminati scheduled this genocide to start at the date that the Bible predicted to be the start of end times.
In case all this was not enough, simply googling how the word GENOCIDE appeared will immediately solve the riddle.

Abortion and "euthanasia" vs kill shot and extermination camps:
Unlike abortion and "euthanasia", both the global compulsory kill shot and extermination camps were orginally scripted to be fully activated in sync with the coming BIG BANG.
That's why two main types of psy-ops setting the stage for this type of genocide, originally scripted for 2009, were served since 2006:
- super virus pandemic hoax (started with the avian flu and was just renamed from ebola to ZIKA);
- "race war", scripted to start with vigilantes and pogroms and end in extermination camps.

The kill shot will take place in homes for elderly (where most are "euthanized") and hospitals and clinics (same as almost all abortions).
But the extermination camps were the first to be added to the list of ongoing genocide tactics, more precisely what media calls "transit camps for migrants" in Europe.
So at the end of the day global mandatory vaccination became the only genocidal tactic to be FULLY activated in sync with the BIG BANG.
The reason for the change in the timing: the KEY battle of World War III, where Illuminati were not able to crush the syrian rebels.

BASICS
Ongoing genocide: Unprecedented types illustrated by elderly, sick, syrians, christians, refugees

http://great-tribulation.blogspot.com/2015/12/ongoing-genocide-unprecedented-types.html

Jan 2016 - Extermination camps for refugees in Europe: Illuminati pass truth in plain sight, from Germany Justice minister and Belgium Immigration minister to headlines:
"There’s a Solution to the Refugee Crisis, But No One Is Talking About It"
http://truth-in-plain-sight.blogspot.com...urope.html

Unlike the "transit camps" where refugees started being gassed Sept 2015, these were designed long before the Arab Spring:
USA, EU, Canada, Australia: this time first not only for jews and dissidents but also for non-whites, starting with blacks:
Virtually EVERY mall, stadium and large school built since 2000 designed as FEMA CC in the reduced version, the extermination camp:
http://global-genocide.blogspot.com/2009...ation.html

End Times Paradoxes: Since 2009 mass murder in hospitals, from USA to EU, from Canada to Australia, has DECREASED.
From about 5 million a year in this millenium until 2009 to 4 million yearly since 2009. WHY:
http://end-times-paradoxes.blogspot.com/...since.html
end-times-paradoxes.blog+spot -- /2011/08/

Jan 2016 - Super virus pandemic hoax: Zika follows ebola for mandatory vaccination: GLOBAL kill shot
http://big-bang-now.blogspot.com/2016/01...llows.html

Basic facts about human cattle - self explains why reading it won't have you weep about yourself
Check out which one is relevant in the context of the coming kill shot and coming extermination camps for US and EU citizens:.
http://human-cattle.blogspot.com/2008/12...ading.html
Hint: not the same fact as in the context of what Last Prophet exposed 2006 here:
Avian flu 2006: why super virus pandemic HOAX NOT launched as bovine or swine flu
http://big-lie.blogspot.com/2006/05/avia...ities.html

Jah Truth #fundie #conspiracy #crackpot jahtruth.net

DUNE - GIBRALTAR
The Fremen & THE WAY*

by JAH

*The [Weirding] Way

The film DUNE (not the book) which is supposedly science-fiction, and visually is portrayed as such in the film, is, in reality, a TRUE story that is unfolding now and it is about GIBRALTAR - Gebal Tariq - The Rock of "The Night-Visitant" (in Arabic).
The basic plot of the film is straight out of the pages containing the Prophecies, in the Bible Old Testament Book of the Prophet Isaiah; and also those from the New Testament Books of John and Revelation/Apocalypse Prophecies and also from parts of the Holy Koran.

Paul, the human, (inside of whom is the spirit-Being - THE Sleeper - Christ) was told (whilst on Caladan - Caledonia - Britain) that change is good for a person, it allows them to grow and without change something inside of us [all] sleeps (the soul or Being part of the human+Being) and it seldom awakens (Mark ch. 13 v 36).

"The 'Sleeper' must awaken" (YOU must be born again as your spirit-Being and wake-up to the fact that you are NOT really "only human") or you will never "SEE" (with your awakened spiritual eye-sight) the Kingdom of God, and YOU will NOT enter into it.

Paul, whilst being tested, says, "I must overcome my fear (just like YODA tells Luke he must do, in 'Starwars' and YODA also says, "Luminous-Beings are we, NOT this crude matter," prodding Luke's crude human body - Read my Starwars Booklet). Fear is the mind-killer, it is the little-death that leads to total obliteration. I must face my fear and let it 'Pass-over' me. I must not fear!"

Fear is Satanically-inspired and is irrefutable evidence of a lack of Faith (the word Faith is not the name for Religions, it means "Trust in God"). The more fear, the less Faith; the more Faith, the less fear.

Dune - the desert planet, is, in reality, planet Earth, which is a spiritual desert where not one drop of spiritual rain has fallen during the time of The Testimony of the Two Witnesses (Read my Four Horsemen of The Apocalypse and The Two Witnesses Booklet) that is 1260 days (Prophetic years) in Revelation chapter 11 verse 3.

Dune - Desert Planet - No precipitation (rain). Not one drop of rain falls on the planet - Revelation chapter 11 v 6

11:6 These (The Two Witnesses) have power to shut heaven, that it "rain" (spiritually) not in the days of their Prophecy: and have power over "waters".........

Paul puts on a "Still-suit", to protect himself from the desert, which has two meanings. The first meaning of Still-suit is that of learning to be calm in the face of an ocean of evil (like the Dune-Sea in Starwars and Luke is told by YODA that when he is at peace, calm, then he will know the good-side from the bad) and thereby be able to hear the "still" small telepathic-voice of God, within his mind, for his daily-guidance. The second meaning is more closely demonstrated in the film as the suits distill water to keep them alive and symbolically represent the Fremen-wearers of the suits distilling all information, to take out the impurity and leave them with the TRUTH, which is what they need and can give them Life [eternal].

Muad'Dib says, "The time will come when all (who are a part of the system - like the [collar and] Tie-fighters in Starwars) will turn against us and seek our lives. We must reach the safety of [the] Rock." Inside which there are wind-traps and reservoirs containing millions of decalitres of drinking-water. Exactly as there are blast-traps at the entrances and reservoirs inside The Rock of Gibraltar.

Isaiah chapter 33 verse 16 "He shall dwell on high: his place of defence [SHALL BE] the Fortress of Rock: bread shall be given him; his waters [shall be] sure."

Muad'Dib, in order to lead the Fremen, has to drink The Water of Life, which is poisonous to humans - (symbolising crucifixion, or death, of the "Self"ish human-nature of the body) and thereby conquer death; and be able to guarantee Life Eternal to those who help and fight, for him and God, against Satan and his evil empire.

Yea, though a man were "dead", if he believes ME, yet shall he Live. If he believes my words (NOT other people's words ABOUT me but MY words) and DOES them, he will Live.

Paul then overcomes; conquers; controls and rides on the back of the worms (death) so that they do not attack his disciples (JEDIs).

He then leads the Fremen, and the worms (death) help his disciples to overcome, defeat and destroy the evil empire ruled by Emperor Saddam (who is merely the "glove-puppet" (read my "The Invasion of Kuwait in Prophecy" Booklet) of the REAL Emperor - Satan - like in Starwars) and all of its evil systems of government.

The Guild who are above the human-emperor Saddam and who are the people that really run the world, from behind the scenes (hidden from view), for their master Satan, are, in real life, known as "The Hidden Hand" and they, and their ancestors before them, have been running this world for Satan, for thousands of years.

The Hidden Hand are a small group of extremely (and I do mean in the extreme) rich people who say that they are Jews but are not, they are the synagogue [church] of Satan, as Christ states in Revelation chapter 2 verse 9 and it was they who engineered the crucifixion, for Satan, to try to defeat Christ and retain their obscene wealth, and, in so doing, brought about, the fulfillment of all of the Prophecies about Christ that related to THAT event and time, and which had to be fulfilled, to PROVE Christ's TRUE identity, etc.

DukeofQin #fundie reddit.com

China’s salvation.

The fundamental flaw in the existing Chinese nation is the continued existence of the so-called “Chinese” Communist Party and its hold on power over the organs of the state. The reason why this should no longer be so are myriad but the most succinct reason is that the Communist Party represents a foreign transplant ideology and culture that is distinctly ahistorical and unChinese. The Communist Party is therefore illegitimate. However, consideration must be taken in that the solution to the problem does not end up being worse than the original predicament. The most vocal opponents of the Communist Party both within and without China are the self styled Democratists who champion Western Liberalism as it is practiced in Europe and the United States. However they are not a true opposition to the Communists as they are in fact their doppelgangers hewn from the same Western milieu. The motto of the Communist Party is that only Socialism can save China, under the aegis of a single Marxist-Leninist vanguard party. The motto of the Democrats is that only Socialism can save China, under the aegis of two Marxist-Leninist vanguard parties. The end goal of both the Communists and the Democrats are the same, to ape the reigning Weltanschauung of the West, their only difference is in who should be in the driver’s seat.

The problem lies in the goal itself in that the total Westernization of China ultimately means China’s suicide. As the originators, innovators, and most accomplished practitioners of Western Liberalism are in the West, the legitimacy of any Liberal Democratic Chinese polity will ultimately be forever beholden to the West. That is any deviation from the reigning Western consensus is punished by deligitmization in the form of being labeled insufficiently democratic. Furthermore the core ideology that governs the West is at present virtually indistinguishable from the Communist Party in essence if not in form and has degenerated into what can best be described as Tartarism. What is Tartarism you ask? Tartarism is a social-governmental arrangement in which alien elite, actively hostile to the majority population, seeks to govern by dissolving the ethnic consciousness and cultural distinctiveness of said majority into an indistinctive lump in their imperial soup.

Just as the Manchu Qing usurpers claimed the mantle of the Chinese nation and enslaved the Han with the aid of various compradors and collaborators, the current socio-governmental system as embodied by the West consists of a thoroughly Judaized elite waging a subversive war to destroy the vitality of their respective nations by changing the demographic profile of their societies.

Since Western Liberalism is not a solution to China’s existing predicament, the only remaining solution is for China to chart her own distinctive political course. For many, a return to tradition would seem to be in order. That is the restoration of an emperor as the foundation of government and legitimacy. Unfortunately such romanticism is ill advised because it is precisely the imperial system, or rather its failure that has led us to the China of today. It is simply not only the problem of a “bad” emperor that can bring disaster, but rather even a good emperor is no guarantee of anything. The crux of the issue that the emperor, by virtue of being the emperor, stands above and beyond the lives of regular citizens. By being so detached, even a good emperor stands at risk of developing a fatal case of nobless oblige where his magnanimity can turn out to be disastrous in the long run. Still the optimal form of government has always involved some form of autocracy because the very fundamental nature of democracy means that it must be dysfunctional. By granting political power to everyone in the form of a vote, you grant it to no one because the value of a vote is diluted by its universality. In addition, a democracy assumes the fundamental equality of all voting constituents which flies in the face of empirical evidence. Not all individuals are equal and the voice of neither a fool nor ten thousand fools is worth that of one wise man. Thus political rights should and must be restricted in some manner for the good of all.

The question then remains as to how political rights must be structured and restricted in a post-Communist China. The first strata that must be disenfranchised are naturally women. Giving women political power over men is a more mendacious and reckless act than providing a loaded firearm to an infant. It endangers not just one family but that of the whole nation. The obvious next choice would be the non-Han minorities. China is and shall always be the domain of the Han race. There must be no exceptions to this restriction because one exception begins us down the slippery slope of more exceptions. Non-Han minorities should never exercise political over the Han. The next but not the most obvious choice should be the elderly. Citizens over the age of 65 should have no political rights. This is primarily to avoid the inevitable problem of gerontacratic capture that presently ensnares the West. The elderly vote much more consistently and in greater numbers than any voting block and their primary concern seems to be to keep the flow of government redistribution heading in their direction. This has not proven to be a problem in other Chinese micro-polities, but it is better to be safe than sorry and nip this potential problem in the bud. Education restrictions are generally a poor choice since the educational system in China, as it is becoming in the West, mere credentialism and the over-educated tend to over-indulge in liberalism. The lumpen proletariat and lumpen bourgeoisie are the backbone of any nation and they must not be excluded. The next and most difficult step is to configure a polity that can escape being seized by the plutocracy. This is already a problem in that the capitalist class in China is as materialistic and traitorous as any other and twice as self serving. Hong Kong and Singapore are already controlled by monopolistic cartels and property tycoons who have no compunctions about squeezing every last ounce of sweet and blood from the citizens and show no compunction against importing hostile racial aliens as a means to save or make more money. This is particularly difficult because money will always be wedded to political power and thus to work against this is to work against human nature. Since oligarchy is the default system of human hierarchical organization attempting to interfere in this usually results in externalities. The most brute force method is to restrict political rights to only those who have served 5 or more years in the military. This may be overly restrictive and results in a sample too unrepresentative of the Chinese people but it may be the only panacea to this most vexing of dilemmas.

In sum, the post Communist Chinese state must be governed by male Hans between the ages of 23-65 with a conditional 5 years of military service.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

The Jewish Race
The Jews are characterized and depicted by the Greco-Roman Empire as the “elves” which do Santa Claus’ bidding. Santa lives at the North Pole (i.e., Greenland) where he emails or wires his demands to the Jews in Switzerland who then execute said demands on a global scale. This is why Freyr, the twin brother of the Norse goddess Freyja, is known as the Lord of the elves for the Greco-Roman Empire is lord of the Jews. That is also why the most common greeting in Hebrew is “Shalom” (S+H+L+M), a term which acronymically and/or consonantly equates to “Shill M”. A shill is a fake, a plant or a stooge, while the letter “M” representative of the 13 Bloodlines of the Roman Empire. In other words, the Jews are the unwitting shills of the Greco-Romans in Greenland. In order to ensure that the Jews remain obedient, they have been separated from humanity with their own food (Kosher), history, religion (Judaism), rituals, and identity. The barbaric act of gentile mutilation commonly known as circumcision was originally a Roman act imposed on the Jews to ensure secrecy between them. Therefore, it was customary for Jewish men to show their circumcised penis’ to each other in order to prove that they were in fact Jews and trustworthy of giving or receiving information, intelligence or payment. Although the Jews have victimized countless people over the centuries, they too are victims of the Greco-Roman Empire.

Isle of Ewe (Jew)
Aristotle believed that the Jews originally came from India where they were known as the “Kalan” (C/K+L+N), a term which acronymically speaking is the same as “clan” (C/K+L+N). While Aristotle may in fact be correct, the Jews were evidently named after the Isle of Ewe, a small island on the west coast of Ross and Cromarty in Scotland which is exactly 90 miles away from where the Loch Ness Monster was seen. The term “Jew” and the race of the Jewish people may have been derived from this island as the pronunciation of “Ewe” equates to “Yu” or “Jew”. Coincidentally, there are two competing theories about the meaning of island’s name. Either it was derived from the Old Irish “eo” meaning "yew tree", a possible reference to the linage of the Jewish race which was spawned from the island, and/or it was derived from the Gaelic “eubh” meaning "echo" for the island was responsible for echoing Greco-Roman policy in the underworld. In all likelihood, the Isle of Ewe was responsible for receiving intelligence, money and orders from Greenland via submarines at Loch Ness. The notion that the island was a key port in the underworld is evidenced by the coat of arms of the Isle of Ewe which depicts a U-shaped Greco-Roman Clipper ship. Evidently, prior to the invention of submarines, ships from Greenland would dock at the island. According to Donald Monro’s book “Description of the Western Isles of Scotland” (1549), the "Ellan Ew, haffe myle in length, full of woods, guid for thieves to wait upon uther mens gaire. It perteins to M’Enzie”. Similarly, George Buchanan wrote in his “Rerum Scoticarum Historia” (1579) that the island was "almost all covered with woods, and good for nothing but to harbor thieves, who rob passengers". The references to thieves appear to be a veiled tribute to the Jewish families which previously lived on the island until the Second World War. Due to the usury and fiscal policies implemented in the underworld by the Jews, they became known as notorious thieves. As evidenced by the boot shape of the Isle of Ewe, the island mimics the boot of Italy, the boot of Bern in Switzerland, and the boot of Louisiana, all of which both of which are symbolic of the boot or foot of the Greco-Roman Empire which has been placed on the collective throat of the underworld. In what appear to be tributes to the Isle of Ewe in popular culture, the island was featured in "Lurgi Strikes Britain” (1954), an episode of the television show “The Goon Show”, as well as in the second chapter of Telltale Games' adventure game “Tales of Monkey Island: The Siege of Spinner Cay” (2009). Lastly, the term “I love you”, possibly the most famous three words ever spoken, were evidently derived from the Isle of Ewe. Because the name of the island sounds like "I love you" when spoken, whenever it is used it is a tribute to the Isle of Ewe in Scotland.

Jewish Terrorists
Sicarii comes from the Latin word Sica”, meaning “dagger”. Consequently, the Sicarii, or the "dagger men", were Jewish terrorists who carried out assassinations and murders with short daggers in crowded places before slipping away. They also committed attacks in villages which they raided, plundered and set on fire in order to create fear among those who acquiesced or collaborated with Roman rule. They also kidnapped notables as leverage for the release of their own members which were being held prisoner. In short, the Sicarii Jews were used to commit terror attacks in the Roman Empire in order to destabilize the empire after the 13 Bloodlines of the Roman Empire vacated to Greenland. Titus Flavius Josephus wrote the only account of the activities of the Sicarii, stating: “…a different type of bandits sprang up in Jerusalem, the so-called Sicarii, who murdered men in broad daylight in the heart of the city. Especially during the festivals they would mingle with the crowd, carrying short daggers concealed under their clothing, with which they stabbed their enemies. Then when they fell, the murderers would join in the cries of indignation and, through this plausible behavior, avoided discovery.” This is why the country of Israel is shaped in the form of a dagger, a modern tribute to the Sicarii and the terrorism committed by Jewish people on behalf of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland. Coincidentally, the name “Israel” was created by the combination of the Greco-Roman gods of Isis, Ra and El.
The Jewish Scapegoat
Protocols of Zion, the Jewish playbook on how to divide and terrorize the masses of the world into submission, was conveniently “discovered” in Russia in 1903. This document was most likely leaked on purpose by the Greco-Roman Empire to ensure that those looking for the true source of power in the world would ultimately stumble upon the Jews, never considering that the power structure goes one step higher to Greenland. That is why Zionist Jews and the State of Israel have been implicated in countless terror attacks against their fellow Jews and Goyim alike. The actual word “scapegoat” is defined as an individual, group (Jews), or country (Israel) that is singled out to bear the blame for others. The concept of the Jewish scapegoat is coincidentally the central theme of Yom Kippur, also known as the Day of Atonement, the holiest day of the year for the Jewish people.

Star of David
The Star of David, known in Hebrew as the Shield of David or Magen David, is widely recognized as the symbol of Jewish identity and Judaism. It is shaped in the form of a hexagon, a 6-pointed star that is formed by the compound of two equilateral triangles. The number 6 is a favorite esoteric number of Rome which is most commonly associated with death and destruction. The name “David” (D+V+D) means "Divide" and the therefore the "Star of David" means the "Star of Steer of the Divide". In other words, the Jewish people are steered by Rome to keep the people divided amongst themselves, but more importantly, to keep the divide between upper Earth (Greenland) and the underworld (hell). The hexagon is significant because through the use and abuse of the Jewish people, Rome has effectively put a hex (curse) or a hoax on all of mankind. The two opposing triangles depicted in the Star of David (see below) can be taken quite literally as what is ordered by Rome in Greenland is reflected and executed in the underworld by the Jewish people through the main Roman proxy state of Switzerland.

Sanhedrin (World Jewish Congress)
The Sanhedrin, meaning "sitting together", was an assembly of 20-23 Jewish men appointed in every city in the Land of Israel. The Great Sanhedrin was made up of a “Nasi” who functioned as head or representing president, but was not a member of the court. Although only conjecture, it’s highly likely that the Ashkenazi Jews were descendants of the Nasis or Nazis. Ashkenazi Jews represent the bulk of modern Jewry, with at least 70% of Jews worldwide. The last session of the Great Sanhedrin reportedly occurred in 358 AD when the Hebrew Calendar was adopted. The Sanhedrin was allegedly dissolved after continued persecution by the Roman Empire. The Sanhedrin is traditionally viewed as the last institution that commanded universal Jewish authority among the Jewish people in the long chain of tradition from Moses until the present day. While the Sanhedrin no longer exists in name, the World Jewish Congress (WJC) was founded in Geneva, Switzerland, in August 1936 as an international federation of Jewish communities and organizations. According to its mission statement, the World Jewish Congress' main purpose is to act as "the diplomatic arm of the Jewish people." The WJC has special consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council. The main aims of the organization were to create “a worldwide Jewish representative body based on the concept of the unity of the Jewish people, democratically organized and able to act on matters of common concern”. Although only conjecture, the World Jewish Congress likely meets in Basel, Switzerland which coincidentally has a Congress Center. Since Switzerland is the first Jewish state and there is no official congress within the Swiss government, the Congress Center may be the underground location where the Jewish Congress meets on a regular basis.

Racist Ideology
Just as the Romans are racist to anyone without pure white skin, red hair and blue eyes, most Jews are racist against anyone not of their ethnic origin. The term goy or goyim which is found in the Talmud, the Jewish Bible, refers to all those who are not Jews as “animals” and a number of other derogatory and racist terms. The irony is that the terminology used by the Jews against the peoples of the world is the same terminology used by the Romans against the Jews and the people of the world. In essence, the Jewish race and religion was created as a cover so that the Romans could carry out their evil in the world while scapegoating the Jews in the process. The only way to keep the Jews form assimilating with and feeling sympathetic to the other peoples of the world which would obviously disrupt Rome’s evil plan for the world is to keep the Jews separate. This is done by giving the Jews their own religion (Judaism), their own Bible (Talmud) their own place of worship (synagogue), their own type of diet (kosher food), their own type of penis (due to circumcision), their own Jewish holidays most of which coincide with Roman holidays, and of course their own country of Israel which is used to justify their evil deeds against the goyim. An example of a Roman holiday doubling as a Jewish holiday is the Purim. Although Jews have been indoctrinated to believe Purim is a celebrating victory of the Jews over their enemies, it was actually the Roman Empire which defeated Persia by trickery. Purim is celebrated annually on the 14th day of the Hebrew month of Adar. The 14th letter in the Roman Score (alphabet) is the letter “X” meaning “kill”, hence the name Xerxes I of Persia which was posthumously given to the defeated king.

Fake History of the Jews
According to modern historical accounts, the Kingdom of Judah in Israel was conquered by the Babylonian army in the early 6th century BC, destroying the First Temple which was the center of ancient Jewish worship. The Jewish elite of Judah were then exiled to Babylonia (i.e., Babylon, Rome) which is historically regarded as the first Jewish Diaspora. The Jews later returned to Judah after the subsequent conquest of Babylonia by the Persians some 70 years later, a period known as the Babylonian Captivity. A new Second Temple was then constructed and old Jewish religious practices were resumed. During the early years of the Second Temple, the highest religious authority was a council known as the Great Assembly, led by Ezra of the Book of Ezra. The Great Assembly was allegedly responsible for writing the last books of the Bible and sealing the canon. However, after the alleged First Jewish-Roman War (66–73 AD), the Romans allegedly destroyed the Second Temple. In all likelihood, the purported Jewish–Roman Wars as well as the Bar Kokhba Jewish Revolt (132-136 AD) never transpired in reality. They were only created in order to give the Jewish people a sense of history as well as the idea that they once fought valiantly against the Roman Empire for whom they now unwittingly serve. The very notion that the Roman Empire would allow the Jews to build Solomon's Temple (i.e., The First Temple) and The Second Temple which are almost identical to Greco-Roman temples with their famous arches and columns, is preposterous to say the least. In order for the Jews to fulfill their role as “God’s chosen people” and enforce Roman policy in the underworld, they truly have to believe in their hearts that they are in charge, hence the creation of their fraudulent history.

Aelie Capitolina
The city of Aelie Capitolina was allegedly built in Israel by the Roman Emperor Hadrian on the current site of Jerusalem. It was allegedly destroyed in 70 AD in the wake of the Jewish Bar Kokhba revolt of 132–136. Aside from the fact that "Aelie" in acronymically translates to "lie", the city of Jerusalem is not adjacent to any river, sea or ocean, an unlikely candidate for a major metropolitan Roman city. According to a February 21, 2012 report by Haaretz, in a few more years, Aelia Capitolina could again be covered over by new buildings, a clear sign that there is absolutely no interest in excavating and finding the hypothetical former city. After all, if Jerusalem was completely excavated, the myth behind Aelie Capitolina and its fraudulent history would ultimately disappear, something the Greco-Roman Empire cannot afford to let happen. If there was in fact a Jewish capitol underneath the city of Jerusalem, excavators would surely find far more than just a large pottery-workers village that allegedly served as the city’s central clayware manufacturing plant.

Fake Persecution of the Jews
In “Embassy to Gaius”, Philo of Alexandria (i.e., Philo Judaeus), the man after which Judaism was named, claims to have been part of an embassy sent by the Jews to the Roman Emperor Caligula to ask that the rights of the Jews be secure. Philo asked Caligula, "Are you making war upon us, because you anticipate that we will not endure such indignity, but that we will fight on behalf of our laws, and die in defense of our national customs? For you cannot possibly have been ignorant of what was likely to result from your attempt to introduce these innovations respecting our temple." Since Jewish customs, laws and temples did exist at that time, these historical references were evidently created by Philo in order to give the Jews the desired identify they would need in order to effectively fulfill their role as the henchmen of the underworld. Philo goes into detail about the horrific plight of the Jews when he states that Flaccus "was destroying the synagogues” and that he "issued a notice in which he called us all foreigners and aliens... allowing any one who was inclined to proceed to exterminate the Jews as prisoners of war." Philo also states that the Roman mobs "drove the Jews entirely out of four quarters, and crammed them all into a very small portion of one ... while the populace, overrunning their desolate houses, turned to plunder, and divided the booty among themselves as if they had obtained it in war." In addition, Philo states that the enemies of the Jews "slew them and thousands of others with all kinds of agony and tortures, and newly invented cruelties, for wherever they met with or caught sight of a Jew, they stoned him, or beat him with sticks". Philo even states that, "the most merciless of all their persecutors in some instances burnt whole families, husbands with their wives, and infant children with their parents, in the middle of the city, sparing neither age nor youth, nor the innocent helplessness of infants." Some men, he says, were dragged to death, while "those who did these things, mimicked the sufferers, like people employed in the representation of theatrical farces". It appears that Philo’s accounts of the Jews in Alexandria was fabricated in order to give the Jews a fake history of persecution so that the Jewish race as a whole would always be paranoid and stick together, a genius strategy which has worked even until this very day.

High Priest Mageson 666 #fundie josministries.prophpbb.com

New Year Address


This planet is in bad shape and so is most of everything on it. This is all due to the Jews and that's all. I have as many thought the ages wrote many volumes that show this.

Around two thousand years ago this planet was on a major cusp moving towards the age of competition that of Pisces. This was secluded to an age of high art, culture, science, spirituality and the age in which man would ascended to the light fully. Mithraism was becoming the spiritualist movement to reconsolidate the spiritual teachings into a unified form in the Roman Empire, the movement towards technological discovery and creativity in Rome was moving along with steam ships, advanced mechanical computers, the basics of physic's development in mathematical theories. A new age of architectural wonder which matched ancient Egypt being built up. A real enlightenment was advancing. Even texts mentioned in which people had achieved the full ascension of the soul. Great masters who were teachers of Great Roman Emperors, Aryan Men of great light. This current was moving towards creating a utopian world and civilization.

Then the Jews attacked with a military coup which destroyed the ascended line of the Roman Emperors who were men of the spiritual class of the Patricians. And put a line of psychopathic lunatics in power the Flavians whom the first Emperor Vespasian built a statue to the Jew whom he stated was responsible for him becoming Emperor. Who was a member of the Jewish Alexandria family, the same family became the core of the new rulers and their money and power ran it. Titus another Flavian was married to a Jewess from one of these Jewish oligarchies. The Jewish Flavian's built the Coliseum and worked to destroy the spiritual mysteries from every angle and violently persecute and kill the spiritual philosophers while slowing destroying the Patricians from every method they could.

Then after a decades of this the Jews unleashed the Christian ideology from the Flavian regime they ran with their Catholic regime and did to the Roman Empire what Pol Pot did to Cambodia, the year zero. These Jews bragged they exterminated the entire civilization that came before their Catholic regime. Creating the dark ages on purpose to control everything.

The Age of Pisces became the age of Jewish run terror under the Catholic Churches and Protestant ones as well. Then the rise of the Jewish bankers and the Communist terror they spread around the earth along with the world wars they started. This all designed from every angle the constant corruption of science, spiritual teachings and societies, social movements to better things even the school system what was meant to educate is now to dumb down. Every step these Kikes have tried to hold back our progress even down to pushing cancer cures and free energy technology out of existence, poising the food supply the water, air, everything. Destroying any high culture, art, music, ideals anything with poison of their corruption at every turn and angle without rest. We try and live and they want us to die, that's it.


Because Satan and our Gods along with noble people on earth have fought these Kikes every step of the way from Rome to this day. That is the only reason this planet is not destroyed along with everyone on it by these Kikes. The Kikes evil persistence has meant with non-stop courage of Noble human resistance. Satan sent the world Adolf Hitler at the dawning of the next age of the world, Aquarius, to open a door to a utopian world order and combat the evil of the Jew which was destroying the planet and the peoples of the world with their final end game move of World Communism. Hitler rallied the world and from Japan to India, from Africa to Europe millions of Noble people hurled themselves with total self sacrifice into the fires and against the jaws of the Jewish beast. All those men who left their families knew they were not coming back. They marched knowingly into a living nightmare for the world struggle of truth, because that's the human spirit the Jew just can't crush. They died so we could live free in a spiritually evolved world under the Swastika of Satan.

Because of our brave, noble and beloved Fuhrer, we are not living in the nightmare of World Jewish Communism. He was the 11th hour saviour of the world and threw Himself into the jaws of the beast to save us along with millions of other noble people of the World Hitler Awaking. The Swastika generation.

Here we are going into 2016 and in the first few years of the Aquarian age. And the same struggle abounds. However because of the noble souls persistence to do right even if they perish in its cause. We are winning, the wheel of fate is turning our favour. However this is only due to persistence against them. All of you who have been working for enlightenment of the people and taking part in the rituals. You are a blessing to this earth and all good beings everywhere. Never give up, because in this world we will have our shinning age that the previous was supposed to be. Because noble beings didn't surrender in the last age or this one.

I have read messages of people complaining about the do nothings, herd zombies in society. Don't worry about them. The world matters because your in it, not them. You are the spiritual light and hope for humanity not them. History remembers those who persisted. And in time the herding of today will stand at the base of the statues of Hitler, awakened and thankful for those who persisted for them, in the cause of truth in a time of great darkness.

And that day they will clasp their hands together in devotion and looking upwards say with deep spiritual reverence, the words:

"Hail Hitler!"

Whitney Ellenby, “Autism Uncensored: Pulling Back The Curtains” #ableism #psycho washingtonpost.com

(Remember Judith Newman and her book “To Siri With Love”, where talking about how she would like to have her autistic son castrated is far from the worst thing she does, while completely assured of her own self-righteousness, and yet got praised by the neurotypical critics and public? By all accounts, this book is even worse. Far worse.)

Bystanders were horrified. But my son has autism, and I was desperate.

What I did to help my 5-year-old autistic son overcome his intense fear of indoor spaces might not have been right or even safe. Doctors didn’t recommend it. The people who witnessed it were appalled, understandably. I don’t suggest this for others.

I could have been more patient with conventional methods, but I wasn’t. I am not certified in restraining children, though doctors say anyone attempting what I did should be. They would also recommend a much slower approach.

I am writing this because I hope to educate people about the burden families face when their autistic children have tantrums in public spaces, so next time you witness such a struggle you don’t immediately resort to blaming the parents. I’m also reaching out to fellow parents in pain to remind them to cast off shame, because I believe nothing is more important than getting your autistic children out into the world.
AD

It was a desperate time. Nothing else had worked for Zack — flashcards, photos, play therapy. gradual exposure to feared indoor spaces. That is how, very much against his will, I ended up physically dragging Zack into Verizon Center (now Capital One Arena) one day 10 years ago to see his favorite character, Elmo, perform as part of a “Sesame Street Live!” show.

There is nothing anyone could have said that would have convinced me my son was anything other than precious and worthy of the extreme measures I intended to take to save him from a life entrapped by autistic phobias.

My mind-set that day: If I can get him through this without either of us getting physically hurt, his fear of this place will be behind him for good. He will reset his association with this arena, and it will no longer be frightening. I believe this deeply, but getting him over the hurdle is terrifying.
AD

‘I have this thing called autism’: A boy’s eloquent message to his fourth-grade classmates

We enter Verizon Center, and the moment the exterior door closes behind us, Zack reels back and plunges toward it, trying frantically to get back outside. At 50 pounds, his furious strength is a troubling match for mine. He is a thoroughbred of resistance.

My usually buoyant child is slamming his fists and clawing at the metal door’s push bar. I quickly seize him by the shoulders and pry his fingers from the bar as he jerks his head back in a sudden motion. His skull smashes into my chin, and I taste the metallic taint of my own blood.

I give up trying to pry his fingers away, wrap both arms tightly around his torso and yank him back fiercely. We both tumble to the floor. Zack momentarily escapes my grip and scrambles back toward the door, but I leap on top of him, pinning his entire body flat to the ground. We are still in the vestibule.
AD

This was a mistake, too ambitious, I think to myself. Everything is happening too quickly.

Breathlessly, I pivot myself to secure Zack’s entire body between my thighs as I clamp down tightly and interlock my feet to prevent him from breaking free. Zack is shrieking at an alarmingly high pitch, but I keep heaving and dragging us both, inch by dreadful inch, closer to the show’s main entrance area, which we are separated from by a red curtain. I can hear voices around us.

“Hey, lady! Your kid obviously doesn’t want to go to the show!”

An icy shock sprints down my back, and I reflexively arch and look around wildly. Someone has just thrown their soda at me.

No, I’m not giving up.

Suddenly, I feel an imaginary cloak descend and slowly envelop me. These are the moments I’ve been dreading, but also building toward, and I don this invisible armor, now impervious to ridicule because I don’t care what anyone thinks. My singular focus is getting Zack where he needs to be: inside the main area, looking at Elmo. The show has already begun inside, and I know Elmo is on the stage.
AD

Okay, get in his head now, talk back to his thoughts. Keep it simple.

“Zack, you are doing it! I know you’re afraid, but all you have to do is stay here, you’re already doing it, you’ve already won. Just stay and watch, sit and watch, that’s it. You did it. You’re doing it. You did it!” A simple and repetitive mantra to penetrate the panic and break through the force field.

In a now recovered and controlled voice, I loudly announce, “My son has autism and he’s terrified. I’m working with him to get his fears under control.”

A manager strides toward us, summoned to calm the explosive scene.

“Miss, I’m afraid this is too disruptive to the other patrons to let this continue, you’ll have to leave.” No response. Repeat with emphasis. “Miss, you are creating a public disturbance, and I need to escort you and your child out of the auditorium right now.”
AD

“No,” I respond calmly without looking up. “I’m not going anywhere. I’m a paying customer too, and I have a right to be here, and so does my autistic son.”

Suddenly, from the far reaches of my mind, the legal jargon jettisons to the surface. What was that ADA language about the right of disabled people to access public facilities? That they have a right not be discriminated against because of their disability, a right to reasonable accommodations to access public venues. My son is not legally required to enter the auditorium quietly. He’s allowed to enter on his own disabled terms. I am his reasonable accommodation.

Zack will ride in on me.

Okay, one more push forward with Zack squeezed between my legs, and that curtain that separates the hallway where we are and the seated auditorium is within arm’s reach. Once the curtain is pulled back, he will see all the children in their seats, and he will see Elmo on the stage. But I am on the floor and I can’t reach the curtain.
AD

I quickly gesture with my hand to the woman guarding the entrance to please pull back that curtain so my son can finally see inside and glimpse the purpose behind the long, bitter altercation. I need her to act quickly. She tries a few times to reach my son with chirpy words that fall on deaf ears.

“LADY, he’s got AUTISM, please just pull back the curtain!” I hiss.

She wordlessly pulls back the plush red velvet in a single swoop to reveal a bright-red, singing caricature on a large stage, clearly visible even from our long distance. I quickly point Zack in his direction and exclaim, “There’s ELMO! Elmo is singing! Look, Zack, it’s Elmo!”

Zack’s eyes catch hold of Elmo, and suddenly he’s too stunned to scream or speak, his hysteria abruptly interrupted by the sight of a familiar friend. Transfixed by the furry creature, Zack sits still and stares intently.
AD

I quickly move to slide him further along the floor, closer to the cushioned seats. The rigidness in Zack’s body gives way as he relaxes, a literal crossover to the other side.

Zack is as smooth and malleable as liquid as he sits upright, almost unaware of his own physical existence and wholly locked in on Elmo. I calmly walk him to his seat. The past and future are of no consequence; for him, there is only the present.

As I gaze around the auditorium, Zack is indistinguishable from his peers. In these precious moments I can savor the reality that Zack has succeeded in the greatest challenge of his life — overriding his intense phobia of indoor spaces — long enough to access something beloved.

It took 36 minutes and 45 seconds. And, yes, it was worth it.

‘I’m more awesomer’: How kids with facial differences are reacting to the movie ‘Wonder’

It was the first in a series of exposures to crowded public places for Zack and me. His transition at the Verizon Center allowed him to enjoy the Elmo show, and also return repeatedly to that auditorium without fear, because he replaced his previous negative association with a positive one. For Zack, the gradual exposure approach was not effective. What worked for him was a single, traumatic episode in which he could grasp the purpose of the exposure and feel good about it.
AD

I spoke with his doctor afterward, and he confirmed that by refusing to allow Zack to escape the place he feared, I broke the pattern of negative reinforcement and allowed him to “reset the record.” I also learned that, as a last resort, in a controlled way and only after years of therapy, a licensed behavioral clinician might have physically restrained Zack to force him to confront his fears, had he not responded to more gradual methods.

In the past, when I’d retreated home with him during a tantrum, I was unintentionally reinforcing his phobia. But the doctor made it clear to me he would not recommend this method for any child unless all other methods had been exhausted, and the child was able to handle it without causing harm to himself or others.

For us, the Elmo success paved the way for outings to other indoor places he feared — Disney World, movie theaters, airplanes, the Baltimore Aquarium. Each exposure required less time for him to acclimate. We found that while Zack was initially confused and frightened, he always adjusted. Over time, he became less fearful of all indoor places. He also gained self-esteem once he realized he was conquering his fears and accessing more of the world. And in possibly his biggest win, his overall demeanor became as calm and predictable as his perception of life itself.

Ellenby is a lawyer, writer and mother based in Montgomery County. This piece was adapted from her upcoming book, “Autism Uncensored: Pulling Back the Curtain,” which details her struggles and triumphs with her son’s autism.

Bradlee Dean #fundie sonsoflibertymedia.com

For example, the American people are led to believe that the Supreme Court can redefine God’s definition of marriage (Genesis 2:24).

Americans are now awaiting a very radical and corrupt court to make a decision on the definition of marriage. Let me tell you plainly that government did not create marriage and, therefore, has no business redefining it. So, why are Americans awaiting a decision from the high court? They are to discover God’s Law and apply God’s Law. Who gave the Supreme Court permission to redefine anything? The ignorance of the American people has done this (Hosea 4:6).

“If the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of what the Constitution says, then we have ceased to be our own rulers (Under God), and the Supreme Court is our ruler.” -President Andrew Jackson

Americans have been, for years, talking about Obamacare. Yet, Obamacare is unconstitutional and, therefore, illegal, according to Article 1, Section 8 of The United States Constitution. Instead of the state-controlled media doing their job, by exposing its unconstitutionality and putting the question to this administration as to where they derived their authority to enact an unconstitutional agenda, they divide the people into opposing groups to debate what is illegal. Who gave corrupt government permission to violate constitutional law? Ignorance has (Hosea 4:6)!

These useful idiots lead Americans on with a cycle of rhetorical talk day after day with the same backward flow of information through a system that corruption means to destroy. It is like giving bad medicine to a healthy body. But rest assured – the body can only take so much before it will fail.

The good news is that it all stops when the American people have had enough!

diggerfortruth #conspiracy #racism diggerfortruth.wordpress.com

It wasn’t too long ago that I too believed some of these misconceptions. Sooner or later the Truth and reality catches up with all of us.


1/. White European nations became rich off of the backs of the slave trade and plundering other nations
This is inaccurate. It was always the jews and the gentry directly serving the jews who benefited from the slave trade. After all it was mainly blacks enslaving blacks in Africa. The jews just capitalised on this industry. The actual lower classes never benefited from slavery, because they were slaves themselves; and still are.

And to argue that even the lower classes indirectly benefited due to the infrastructure, this too is not accurate. The European mind and energy has always had the ability to produce, create and invent at an incredible capacity. The railroads, hospitals, theatres, educational institutes were all physically produced by the working class on meagre wages. Any financial gains obtained by jewish families were spent internally to help international jewry; certainly not philanthropically distributed amongst society for the benefit of European peoples. The trickle down effect is another myth. We built and financed everything ourselves, through our hard work, ingenuity and creativity. That is the reality.

The myth that European nations are rich because we pilfered and enslaved others is nonsense – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.


2/. White Europeans invaded African culture, enslaved the blacks and had a cruel apartheid system
First the white Europeans who were fleeing jewish enslavement settled in a barren uninhabited South Africa. There was nothing much there other than nature’s elements – rocks and bushes. The hard working, ingenious, mixed Europeans literately created a superpower out of the bushes. Then when they had built a civilised structure – the blacks came to them. They did not build up their culture off the backs of the blacks.

As for the apartheid – what else could they do? It was the most sensible thing to do, to keep the blacks from rampaging their culture. Just look what is happening to the Afrikaners now that the apartheid has been abolished. The apartheid was essentially a border control that’s all.

The myth that the white South Africans used the blacks to create their lifestyle is ridiculous propaganda – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
[please listen to Karen Smith’s interview below]
t
t
3/. Being racist is the most anti-social thing one can be
Well first of all this word racist was coined by a mass murdering jew called Trotsky. This was created in order to guilt up any Whites who dare to stand up for their European culture. It is a powerful word and meme and this single word alone enables vast amounts of white people to bend over backwards to accommodate non-whites into their culture, just in order not be labeled a racist. Whites will give up their heritage, jobs, culture, lineage, identity and lifestyle so long as they are not called this silly little name. It is truly incredible the power of trigger words through mind control – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
4/. Diversity enriches European societies
On the surface, one could argue that having multiple choices of restaurants from many different cultures is a positive thing for society. One could indeed say that these cultures are contributing to European culture by providing alternatives. But at what price? How much of a payoff do we have for this enrichment? It is obvious by now to anyone who is prepared to use an ounce of logic that behind the surface of this colourful enrichment; the indigenous European peoples are paying a hefty price. In fact we are suffocating. Multiculturalism is the death spell of European culture and civilisation. Had Europeans just had a policy that only small amounts of people can stay providing they provide a unique contribution: a Chinese martial art, a Korean healing system, an Indian meditation technique, etc; then this really would be enrichment. The reality is most people coming to Europe have only one interest – to serve themselves. None of them give a damn about the preservation of our European culture. Every single migrant cares only about their self interests and their culture. None of them actively help to preserve European culture. Diversity = white genocide. Diversity is enrichment – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
5/. Colour is just skin deep – we’re all equal
This is simply not true! One only has to objectively look at each race and look at each races’ achievements. One can use all the excuses in the world as to why certain cultures have not been able to develop; but we all have been on this planet for the same time. It’s too much of a coincidence that in every single part of the globe that White European cultures have lived – civilised cultures have blossomed. Europeans built the pyramids. It is only because of jewish interference that white Europeans have not been able to fully develop. Just look what Germany achieved in just six years free of the parasitic jews. The same for England after Edward the 1st (Longshanks) booted the jews out of England ….look how England prospered. It’s been the same in every European culture, if Europeans are left to flourish on their own without the parasitic jew. The ‘we’re all equal’ narrative is just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
6/. The only reason a high percentage of blacks are violent is because they have been socially suppressed by whites and all they are doing is venting their righteous anger – it’s justified
Righteous anger – about what exactly? Having been afforded 100 fold opportunities in a European culture than in their own culture? Just look at the opportunities they have been given. Companies and local councils are bending over backwards with ‘affirmative action’/equal opportunities for non-whites. In fact it is easier now for a non-white to get a job in a Government/local council job. Not to mention the handouts. And how can the unprovoked attacks on whites be explained in South Africa? These were not oppressed people’s, they were outsiders coming in to destroy White civilisation. The notion that all blacks (as a collective) need is education and they will blend into any civilised European society has now been proven a myth. How far do we have to stretch things to continually come up with excuses for black on white crimes – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide. [please see video channel below]
t
t
7/. White people and white cultures are innately racist
What could be further than the Truth. White people (as a collective) are THE least racist people on the planet. And I struggle with this term racist anyway; as it is another trigger word created by the jews. But as far as being accommodating – there is no race on the planet more accommodating than the white European race. We have given and given and given and given throughout our whole existence. And we continue to give in endless charitable and philanthropic projects. Yet somehow as the providers, we always seem to end up with the racist label and the ones feeling guilty for not having done enough and somehow being the suppressors of non-whites. Had it not been for the white peoples’ inventiveness, with sanitation, electricity, medical resources, etc; the population of non-whites would be far less. Whites are evil racists – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
8/. All races can pull together to fight the common evil
At one point I truly did believe this nonsense. I really did think that if all races and cultures woke up to the JCN, then we’ld live a more peaceful existence – ha. Oh dear, how embarrassing. The concept that if we all pull together to fight our common foe, we would live in peace. Utter nonsense. Just look at each race and how they only look after themselves. You can see it within the Truth movement – the blacks are all about their black issues, the Muslims are only pro-Islam, even the gays only care about their gay issues. None of these secular groups want to join forces to fight the jewish agenda, because secretly they know who is funding their particular agenda. They’re all ultimately about bringing down the European race.
t
t
9/. Just like mongrel dogs, mixed race people are healthier and less susceptible to inbred diseases
And there are people out there who propagate this garbage. As with all these modern memes, it couldn’t be further from the Truth and as always just more inverted Truth. The healthiest of races are the purest of races. This is a given. Mixed race children apparently are not able to receive organ donations. Why all of a sudden would genetics suddenly change in cultures? If races have bred amongst their own for thousands of years; why now is this seemed unhealthy? A jewish propagandised narrative perhaps – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
10/. Black men are more virile than white men
I know this may seem like scraping the barrel, but this topic often crops ups. I’ve had to listen to this crap all my life. It’s so obvious who is behind this myth and why they would propagate it. It is just another method to knock the white man’s confidence. To make him feel inferior to other races. Whilst at the same time programme (propagandise) white women, (along with the music industry) into believing that dating black men is a better option and somehow black men are more masculine. Hence to encourage race-mixing – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.

Sumantra Maitra #wingnut thefederalist.com

Climate Worship Is Nothing More Than Rebranded Paganism
We're seeing sexualized dances, hallucinogens, worshiping nature, confessing sins in pagan animism, worshiping purified teen saints, all to promote a supposedly greater cause.

Lynn Townsend White Jr., an American historian from Princeton, wrote an influential essay in 1967, at the height of the cultural revolution in Western campuses, arguing that Christianity and Judeo-Christian values are responsible for ecological disaster and climate change. The essay, naturally, was adapted by generations after, ironically almost like a document of faith.

The central argument went like this. White argued, “The victory of Christianity over paganism was the greatest psychic revolution in the history of our culture. … By destroying pagan animism, Christianity made it possible to exploit nature in a mood of indifference to the feelings of natural objects.”

If nothing else, the last few days should be enough to prove that Western civilization, a product of more than 1,500 years of Judeo-Christian values, is facing its most significant and sustained challenge in centuries from tribalistic paganism, a force that seeks not only to turn back time but essentially to destroy the entire current edifice.

Greta Thunberg and the Church of Mother Earth
As secular liberalism destroyed the fundamental ties that bind society — faith, flag, and family — the human instincts for faith — to believe, worship, submit, and fear — didn’t just go away but manifested in various other pre-civilized tribal ways. For example, a liberal seminary encouraged its students to skip classes to pray and confess sins in front of potted plants. In Switzerland, 250 people in full funereal garb mourned the apparent approaching death of a glacier.

That is why members of “Extinction Rebellion” do what they do. Extinction Rebellion is an apocalyptic cult that wants to radically end every thing around you, from your private cars to the burgers you eat and the plastic chairs in your yard. It is a cult that was formed after its founder took psychedelic drugs and prayed for “social change.” Members have blocked D.C. and London intersections, “twerking” the way people in a pre-civilized era would perform a fertility dance to pray to Gaia.

And then there’s Saint Greta, our perpetual teen of sorrow. I have been comparing her worship to Joan of Arc ever since she was invited to the British Parliament, the birthplace of modern democracy. She was surrounded by buffoons nodding their heads like they were listening to gospel truth.

Lads, I hesitate to take credit for my predictions…I am magnanimous and noble like that…but this entire Joan of Arc thingy…you guys read it here, first.

"Climate Apocalypticism" is simply a paganist religion, with its own saints, sinners, and providential end. pic.twitter.com/YF5VmGfGVl

— Mr Maitra (@MrMaitra) September 22, 2019

I wrote about her long before the new woke-capital fanatics adopted her as a pawn. In a recent speech to the U.N., while clearly having an emotional meltdown, she told assorted leaders, voice trembling, that they have failed the children and history wouldn’t be kind. The “gatekeepers” immediately hailed her as a brave savior as well as a vulnerable, autistic teen who shouldn’t be bullied.

So, there you have it. Sexualized dances, psychedelic hallucinogens, worshiping nature, confessing sins in pagan animism, worshiping purified teen saints, and throwing them up on an altar, bereft of their childhood, to promote a greater cause. Add to that witches hexing Brett Kavanaugh, and having an Ouija board to invoke the spirit of Karl Marx, and everything old is new again.

The reality is, of course, completely different. Much less than destroying the planet, climate change isn’t even a settled science. Conservatives don’t disagree that climate is changing. That is a straw man. Conservatives, however, are opposed to hysteria, have skepticism about the rate of the climate change, and would like to see an actual cost-benefit analysis of the radical changes being demanded.

More important than that, conservatives understand that climate change is cynically used by a certain section of people to justify their political goals of steering the West away from its way of life, a way they perceive to be evil and harmful, hetero-patriarchal, and capitalist. How? Appealing to the faith-based part of human brains, the need for subservience, and propping up children as human shields.

The Left Created a Climate Crisis and Worships It
Consider a new letter by more than 500 scientists, which the mainstream media completely ignored. It urges the United Nations to have an open debate between scientists from both sides of the argument and states there’s “no climate emergency.” The report goes on to say, among other things:

The world has warmed at less than half the originally-predicted rate; Climate policy relies on inadequate models; More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth; There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent; There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.

In short, everything you’re being told is wrong or flawed, and you’re a chump who is being taken for a ride.

For all the Marxists’ faults, the old left at least wanted to conquer nature instead of turning subservient to it. Of course, that went to its own extremes, but one can imagine Joseph Stalin putting all twerking climate fanatics as mentally ill people in a forced labor camp to build railroads in Siberia. The current Chinese government, likewise, gives two hoots about climate change, and for all the bravery of Green Peace and St. Greta, there’s nothing they can do about China burning more coal than the rest of humanity combined.

The modern left is a combination of two of the worst impulses in human history. First are the ultra-privileged bourgeoisie, which, having lost their old Judeo-Christian faith, are instinctively attracted to pre-civilized rituals, from overt sexuality to fewer familial ties. Consider Late Roman public orgies, and you get an idea. At the same time, human minds feel a gaping void that still needs to be filled by an alternate faith. It is in that intersection where this occultist, apocalyptic climate paganism comes from. It gives some privileged people a noble purpose.

As French philosopher Pascal Bruckner wrote in his book “The Fanaticism of the Apocalypse: Save the Earth, Punish Human Beings,” the current movement has all the trappings of a religion: saints, sinners, a providential end, apocalyptic fear, punishment, and penance. It appears Emperor Constantine’s children clearly failed to civilize their future generations. The pagan barbarians from the north are back circling outside the citadel.

David Barton #fundie wnd.com

In 1945, George Orwell penned “Animal Farm.” One of his characters was Squealer the pig, who arbitrarily redefined words so that they would mean what he wanted. As Orwell explained about Squealer, “he could turn black into white” as part of his attempt to get the other animals to accept his message. It appears that secular progressives are the modern Squealer.

According to them, Donald Trump has now shown us who he really is: a theocrat. Never mind that leading up to the election, we were all fed a steady diet of how irreligious he was. That doesn’t matter anymore. Now he’s a theocrat!

Ironically, they don’t even call the pope a theocrat, and especially not their Shariah supremacist friends seeking to install a global caliphate. The term “theocrat!” is so repulsive that it is reserved solely for Donald Trump and those who support him.

They are so repulsed by traditional religion that they exploded in derision after first lady Melania Trump recited the Lord’s Prayer at a rally in Florida. And then when a public meeting in Louisiana was opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, the invocation was repeatedly interrupted with vocal outbursts and heckling. All of this was nauseating to them, but then – horror of horrors! – Trump promised to restore constitutional protections for the rights of religious conscience and to level the political playing field to allow people of faith to have the same constitutional free-speech rights secular folks have. That announcement was so terrifying it caused a Washington Post columnist to warn the nation that “Much-dreaded ‘Shariah law,’ or something resembling it, may well be coming to the United States.” Wow.

Let’s see if I get this right: If you want to restore the constitutional free-speech rights of all citizens, including pastors (rights unconstitutionally removed by Sen. Lyndon Baines Johnson in 1954), and if you want to protect the constitutional rights of religious conscience (which, historically speaking, is America’s first-protected, most-important and longest-cherished politically protected right), then you are establishing a “theocracy”?

To quote a famous line from Inigo Montoya in the popular movie “Princess Bride:” “You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.”

I understand that it might be difficult for secular progressives to know the meaning of a word as simple as “theocracy.” Most of them probably went first to public school and then attended an “elite” academic college afterward, and study after study affirms that most of those who attend such institutions no longer receive even a rudimentary knowledge of basic historical facts (and they certainly don’t get much logic or common sense).

So just for clarity, here’s the simple definition of “theocracy”:

“A system of government in which priests rule in the name of God, or a god.” (Oxford Dictionary)

“A form of government [with] the God’s or deity’s laws being interpreted by the ecclesiastical authorities.” “A system of government by priests claiming a divine commission.” (dictionary.com)

“Government ruled by … religious authority.” (American Heritage Dictionary)

Do they really believe that Trump is a priest, or an ecclesiastical authority? How silly! And a theocracy also uses coercion and force to enforce its beliefs and dogmas. Furthermore, it excludes input from the people – no elections. So by definition, a constitutional republic with open elections, such as America has, cannot be a theocracy (but let’s not confuse them with something so simple).

However, there is one other important fact secular progressives ignore: Just as religion can be the basis of a theocracy, according to the U.S. Supreme Court, so, too, can non-religion. Back in 1965, the court held (and reiterated many times since) that all that is required to be a “religion” is “whether a given belief that is sincere and meaningful occupies a place in the life of its possessor parallel to that filled by the orthodox belief in God.” The court has therefore repeatedly ruled that progressives, humanists, Satanists, atheists, evolutionists and other such secularist groups are just as religious as Bible-based groups, and so each of these secularist groups now receives the same religious tax-deductible standing as traditional religious groups.

So, if what Trump believes can represent a theocracy, so, too, can what secular progressives believe. In fact, secular progressives are more likely to be truly theocratic, for they regularly exercise coercion to force dissenters to adopt their beliefs. If you doubt this, just ask the bakers, florists, photographers, clerks, chaplains and others who have tried to avoid participating in the progressives’ religious rites to their great goddess of the Sexual Revolution, whether abortion, homosexuality, transgenderism, or other manifestations of the LGBT agenda. (Significantly, Romans 2:21-23 in the Bible points out that critics are often guilty of the very crimes and shortcomings they accuse others of. That certainly appears to be so in this case.)

So how does the charge of “theocracy!” relate to what Trump and his administration is doing? It doesn’t – unless you are Squealer the pig.

Matt Forney #fundie mattforney.com

[A transcript of Matt Forney's speech at the recent Identitarian Ideas IX conference]

I don’t think I need to remind anyone that the election of President Donald Trump was a turning point in American and European history. For our entire lives, our overlords in the government and media have told us that we were on the losing side of history. That we were destined to fail. That the future of our civilization was rainbows, unicorns and chocolate chip cookies, fruits Frenching their boyfriends in front of empty churches, neon-lit mosques eclipsing the cities our forefathers labored to build, and finally, being finessed out of our neighborhoods by swarthy foreigners who stare at our sisters, wives and girlfriends the way lions stare at gazelles.

But for now, the arc of the moral universe has been redirected.

The arc of the political universe has also been redirected. One of the most important achievements of the past two years has been the total destruction of the mainstream American right-wing. My friend Edwin Oslan calls them “Conservatism, Inc.,” the alt-right calls them “cuckservatives,” but regardless of how we abuse them, they were the primary impediment to real, nationalist change in the West. It is they, not the left, who are the biggest losers in the age of Trump. Right now, the left is so excited about the prospect of “resisting” the President that they almost seem sexually aroused by it. It’s your National Reviews, your Weekly Standards, your Rick Wilsons and Rich Lowrys and rich finks in general who have lost everything in the God-Emperor’s ascent.

I’m not just talking about the neocons, the loudest, yappiest poodles echoing in the cuckservative kennel. There’s a whole world of inanity beyond the armchair quarterbacking of soft, pudgy Manhattan intellectuals renaming French fries to “freedom fries” or calling on poor men’s sons to fight their wars for them. Mr. Trump has helped sledgehammer the foundations of American cuckservatism, and we are now dancing among the ruins.

A common refrain during the election was that Donald Trump was not a “true” conservative. The myth of the post-National Review right-wing in America is that the United States was intended to be a different society than the nations of Europe, one bound not by blood and soil but by the liberties granted by the Constitution: the proposition nation. In the minds of the geldings who believe this myth, such as, for example, the guy at CPAC who denounced us as “left-wing fascists” a couple of days ago, Trump and the alternative right are a rejection of these core American values, a return to the bad old days of European nationalism, endless war and diminutive Austrian men with funny mustaches.

The problem with myths is that they have a bad habit of being false. The proposition nation so beloved of William F. Buckley and Norman Podhoretz is nothing but Saran wrap stretched over the casserole of white America. While it’s true that the Constitution represented a break from the European tradition of monarchy, the ideals that fueled the American Revolution were derived from Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and implemented by Americans of European descent. Without Europe’s peoples or its philosophies, there is no Constitution, there is no right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and there is no United States of America.

The “golden age” of immigration to Ellis Island, so beloved of cucks and leftists and a fundamental underpinning of the proposition nation myth, is itself a crock of garbage. As Jim Goad detailed in his book The Redneck Manifesto, during the 19th century, corporations lobbied the U.S. government to bring in Italians, Chinese and other foreigners to break the backs of labor unions and lower wages for the average worker. The lie that immigrants do the jobs that Americans don’t want to do has a far longer history than you think.

But myths cannot take root unless they contain some truth. You may not believe that Jesus Christ died for your sins, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the Romans didn’t nail him to the cross. Similarly, while the U.S. is hardly a proposition nation, bound together only by the Bill of Rights, its history as a colonial state has kept white Americans from forming a cohesive, rooted culture.

Rare are the Americans who are so attached to their hometowns that they don’t want to leave them. Packing your bags and moving to another state, even if it’s on the other side of the country, is as American a tradition as sportsball and diabetes. From the settlement of Jamestown and the landing at Plymouth Rock to the Louisiana Purchase to the California gold rush to the rise of the Sun Belt in the 1950’s and sixties, if white Americans didn’t like where they were, they went somewhere else. I know that when I was a kid, I dreamt of nothing more than getting out of my hometown of Syracuse, New York, that decaying Rust Belt ghetto midway between New York City and Toronto.

People who are constantly moving from point A to point B cannot put down roots and develop a sense of self. In fact, recent scientific research has shown that the brains of those who live in the same place their entire life develop far differently than those who migrate to new locales. White Americans never developed a unified sense of who they are because they’ve never stayed in one place long enough for the question to come up. And that’s before we get into mass immigration, media propaganda and the other myriad ways that cultural Marxists have tried to destroy the spirits of white Americans.

Now, we do have strong regional identities: as explained in the book Albion’s Seed, the United States was settled by four distinct groups from the British Isles, and our politics and culture is in many ways a continuation of the struggle between the Cavaliers and the Roundheads during the English Civil War. But no singular white consciousness has ever existed in the U.S. Ask a Swede, a Pole, or a Hungarian who he is and what his nation means to him, and you’ll get concrete answers rooted in cultural memory going back centuries. Ask the same question of an American and you’ll quickly find out that there’s no “there” there. At the moment, mindless consumerism is the only duct tape holding the U.S. together.

So, yes, the cucks have—had—a glimmer of a point: as a settler state of European mutts, the U.S. was not merely an extension of its fatherland. But that has come to an end, not because of Donald Trump or the alt-right, but ultimately because of the left themselves.

Years ago, when I was skeptical of white advocates and tribalism, I wrote on my old blog In Mala Fide that a political movement like the alt-right would never work because whites in the U.S. don’t define themselves by their whiteness, unlike blacks. A reader of mine interjected by saying that whites have already been defined as white, in the negative, by the left. And he was right.

To be white is to be the world’s whipping boy. It means being blamed for everything from poverty in Africa to environmental degradation to women not having enough space to sit down on the subway. It means being told to shut up and sit down, that your opinion is worthless because of your “privilege,” and that the eventual disappearance of your people and culture is a sign of progress.

To be white, straight and a man is even worse, because you’re told that your natural masculine instincts, your natural desires to bed and wed women make you an oppressive misogynist. In 21st Century Parody World, six-year olds are allowed to take dangerous hormones so they can become a funhouse mirror version of the opposite sex, but not asking your wife for permission before you kiss her can land you in prison for rape. And if you’re not happy with this arrangement, you’re expected to sate yourself with degenerate Japanese cartoons and pornography, the bread and circuses of the globalist empire. That’s how mad the Marxists are: they don’t merely want to destroy our culture and identity; they want to destroy the very things that make us human.

Sun Tzu stated that when you have surrounded your enemy, you must give him a way to escape, or else he will fight you to the death, having nothing to lose. The left never learned that lesson, because they’ve pursued whites—white men—everywhere they’ve gone, leaving them no quarter and no place to call their own. Even video games, long the province of virginal nerds, were not safe, which is what sparked the GamerGate movement three years ago, the first successful backlash against cultural Marxism in most of our lifetimes. The white men of gaming saw leftists trying to subvert their favorite hobby, one they retreated to after society rejected them, and said no more. Enough. This line you shall not cross.

It was this spark that ignited the pile of TNT that was the Trump campaign and the alternative right. The average Trump voter isn’t explicitly aware of all the issues that we are versed in. They don’t know everything that we know. But they know, deep down, that something is wrong. They know that fifty years of mass non-white immigration and globalist free trade have ruined them financially and placed their lives and that of their children in peril. And they see, day in and day out, the chattering classes tell them that they are the problem. They see liberal arts dilettantes in Brooklyn brownstones, rent paid courtesy of Daddy’s credit line, banging out “thinkpieces” every day claiming that all the world’s ills are thanks to those stupid white rednecks in Kentucky, Michigan or Pennsylvania, and as soon as they kick the bucket and give way to all these newcomers from Mexico, we’ll be all better off.

White Americans saw this repulsive display and they said no more. Enough. This line you shall not cross. And they turned out to support a champion who would fight for them. Donald Trump is the first politician in years who treats white Americans as a group with interests of their own, interests that are worth defending. While he is far from the alt-right ideologically, Trump’s nationalist presidency is aiding the maturation of white America from an empty, consumerist frontier into a people with an identity of their own, one that runs deeper than pop culture effluvia and waxing autistic about “muh Constitution.”

I’ll end with an interesting anecdote.

Over the past few years, I’ve noticed an increasing number of houses in upstate New York flying Confederate flags. Seems absurd on the face of it. Why are white New Yorkers adorning their homes with the flag flown by the Southern rebels that their ancestors fought in the Civil War? After all, you don’t see many Poles flying the Hammer and Sickle, or many Koreans paying obeisance to the emperor of Japan. Then it hit me: the U.S. has become so deracinated and so debauched that rural Northern whites are reaching for any emblem of culture that they can get their hands on, anything that they can call theirs.

To the cultural Marxists, the Confederate flag represents white America, the white America they seek to destroy and replace with foreigners, a symbol that drives them insane with hatred. To rural whites across the U.S., lambasted as the embodiment of everything wrong with the world, the Confederate flag is a gesture of defiance to those who would see them dead and buried. A symbol of implicit white identity, transcending the petty regional differences between North and South, united against the forces of globalism, multiculturalism, and degeneracy.

None of us can say for certain whether this a struggle our people will win. But I can say this: we will not lie down and die either. Regardless of how the next eight years play out, the dragon of white identity has been roused from his slumber, and he’s not going back to bed anytime soon.

As my friend the Bechtloff says, I’ve made my peace with God. Let’s dance.

Thank you.

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

The reactionary program is fallen governance for a fallen world: Immanentizing the Eschaton is the progressive program, it is the opposite of the reactionary program. Whosoever claims that the truest and most pure reaction will Immanentize the Eschaton is a progressive entryist, like those telling Muslims that Islam is the religion of peace, therefore the truest Islam is something that is suspiciously progressive sounding, like those telling Christians that single mothers are heroes, and that they should adopt blacks from Saharan Africa.

“hello fellow white male hetero sexual reactionaries. My reaction is purer than your reaction. And yet at the same time we need to be acceptable to moderates in order to obtain the broadest possible outreach.”

Reaction deals with fallen men as they actually are – hence we want our ruling bandit to be a stationary bandit evil overlord, and view the primary problem with government as mobile banditry – that anonymous bureaucrats have, as Taleb says, no stake in the game. We are worried about the evil overlord’s incentives, and not much worried about whether he represents the people, and not much worried whether he is nice and virtuous. We want a good man for Archbishop, but someone mighty like Trump for President, President for Life, King, God King, and Holy American Emperor.

If Trump successfully does a Stalin or a Cromwell, freezes leftism at the current year, that will be great, for the full implementation of the reactionary program is likely to be through all out war, where cities get burned, likely by nuclear fire, women and children get massacred, and the winning side is the side most willing to do the most terrible things.

If he does a Sulla, and rolls leftism back to 1933 that will be even better.

If he rolls leftism back to the leftism of the founders, better still. Best of all if he gets crowned God Emperor of the New Holy American empire, does a Charles the Hammer and a Charles the Second and rolls things back to 1660, in which case we are likely to get one hundred and sixty years of reaction.

The worst case outcome however, and a very likely outcome, is long, bloody, and terrible civil war with our enemies masters of the state. Trump gets impeached, not long after that imprisoned, and not long after that he and his entire family is murdered like the Romanovs as civil war and white genocide begins. In which case we will have to whip up our own state in one hell of a hurry.

Everyone who practices with a gun on the gun range is on our side.
Most men who lift iron are on our side.
Most men who practice the seriously dangerous martial arts on our side.
The great majority of young white males are our side.
Deus Vult. God is on our side.

But as well as that, if our enemies have a state, we will need a state.

Whites are in line for hot genocide. Whites also have more capability for war than any other race. No other race, no other people, have ever shown anything close to the capacity for organized mass violence. Which means that to re-awaken our capability, we need organization and mass.

To re-awaken the sleeping warrior, reward him for victory personally and individually with land, women and power, as well as with land and power for his platoon, his company, and his regiment. He will be back.

Set the status of women back to what it was in eighteenth century England, or better, back to what it was in the Carolingian empire. He will be back.

If the state remains in the hands of people who wish to destroy us, we will have to build our own state, and the quickest way to whip up a state from nothing much is feudalism and freehold – the full reactionary program. Every company and every regiment needs to be largely responsible for its own logistics, and will need its own pool of camp followers, thus will need its own domain of state power.

It would be better if part of the existing state comes over to us, with its existing institutions, in which case we will get something considerably less than the full reactionary program, very likely will get a Cromwellian program. We are not in this to build utopia. Reaction is impure in its essence, being committed to doing the best we can in a regrettably fallen world. The Cromwellian program would be great. Whosoever signals reactionary purity, signals leftism. We are, however, in this to win. If we cannot win with the existing state, or a breakaway part of it, will have to win without, and the full reactionary program is fully optimized for power, war, and the regrettable necessity of dreadful deeds.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

The Battle of New Orleans was one of the most decisive battles in the entire history of the world–the New World equivalent of Marathon or Thermopylae.... Its outcome determined whether the Tabernacle of David, or revived Israel, would survive in the New World!!

Throughout the coming year, patriotic U.S. citizens are planning a whole series of events to celebrate this great bicentennial, culminating in a grand finale of fireworks in New Orleans on January 8, 2016!!

General Jackson's miraculous victory should be a worldwide celebration. With the limitless financial resources of the New World at her disposal, Britannia would have truly MISRULED the waves globally....A modern day version of ancient Tyre and Sidon.

All the New World was given to Spain by a grant of Pope Alexander VI under the forged Donation of Constantine.

Since Emperor Constantine was British, the British also claimed the New World.

There was no place for a revived state of Israel in the proposed British Crown Colony of Louisiana!!

Additionally, the British had a fort in the Oregon Territory called Fort George which was their beachhead for the conquest of California!!

In 1533, Britannia was first declared an Empire when King Henry VIII found out that Emperor Constantine was British:

Where by divers sundry old authentic histories and chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this realm of England is (was) an empire, and so hath been accepted in the world, governed by one supreme head and king having the dignity and royal estate of the imperial crown of the same. (Act in Restraint of Appeals, 1533).

[...]

Unknown to general Jackson, a British spy commanded his militia on the West Bank of the Mississippi River . . . and that almost led to disaster!!

The hard charging colonel William Thornton led the British army on the West Bank of the Mississippi River.

He almost reached New Orleans because the West Bank was commanded by a British spy named general David Morgan.

Judas Morgan and his troops began a precipitous flight which almost turned a British rout into a victory.

Morgan the spy was unable to communicate with Thornton, otherwise he would have advised him to concentrate his forces on the West Bank and thus obtain an easy victory.

Only general Jackson's heroic defense of the East Bank saved the day. Colonel Thornton had to withdraw his men just when Morgan opened the door to New Orleans....That is why the Holy Bible says that spies are despicable!!

Our great JEHOVAH fought for general Jackson as he fought for Joshua during the conquest of Canaan. The battle was brief but intense; it only lasted for about an hour, but during that time, all the British planning and scheming for the American and French Revolutions came to nothing:

Advance our waving colours on the walls;
"New" Orleans is rescued from the English wolves (Shake-speare, Henry VI, Act I, Scene VI).

[...]

Contrary to Kisssin' Cousins Charles Darwin, the Holy Bible says that man is to provide his food by farming . . . and not by hunting like a wild beast. The pioneers tried to bring Christianity and civilization to the Native Americans who lived by hunting and fighting. The British wanted them to remain in their primitive state in order to scalp the pioneers and collect beaver pelts!!

[...]

The British are still in violation of the Monroe Doctrine!!

The great task of expelling the British from the New World, so nobly begun by general Jackson and his brave militia, is still not complete. As long as the British control Canada, this Republic will continue to be the focus of intense spying, industrial espionage, and weather warfare.

As President, the overriding concern of James Monroe was the safety of the New Republic in the Wilderness. His policy, which became known as the Monroe Doctrine, became a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy, and was designed to prohibit any foreign country from ever again interfering in the affairs of the New World Republics.

A huge statue of our Hero on horseback is located in Lafayette Square across from the White House.

James Monroe appointed general Jackson head of the 7th Military District responsible for the southern United States.

As President, he promulgated the Monroe Doctrine which prohibits any European nation from having colonies in the New World.

Here is a brief excerpt from the Monroe Doctrine:

The occasion has been judged proper for asserting, as a principle in which the rights and interests of the United States are involved, that the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. (1823 Monroe Doctrine).

After the Civil War, Canada was invaded and forcibly annexed to the Britain Empire by Colonel Garnet Wolseley.

During the Civil War, New Orleans was actually controlled by the British Confederacy for 2 years. Before that bloody conflict, only 2 national holidays were celebrated: January 8 and July 4. Most patriotic people still celebrate the 4th but January 8 has been dropped due to intense British propaganda. They are working on eliminating the 4th right now.

It's time that all liberty-loving people restore and celebrate this great anniversary once again.

Janice #fundie circleofmoms.com

I just have a 7-year-old daughter. I am able to control her by myself, but I have no experience controlling boys. At least I can tell you what I do, and hope it would work for you too.

It could be that he isn't taking you seriously because you are more easy-going, in a general sense. This is a good thing not a bad thing, if it means you are the one he can go to for help with a problem.

But when you want him to do something in a certain way, he becomes confused, because you don't speak to him in a forceful and demanding way.

I would suggest you buy a few paddleball toys. You can let him play with them, or force him to play with one for a few minutes each day. But of course, you have to remove the ball and string to use it for spanking.

Write his name on the paddle with a felt-tip pen. This is easy if it's wood. If it's plastic, then you can also buy some large white labels that will stick to it. Cover one side with labels, fitted together, and write his name on the labels. Make sure it's written as big as you can write it, so it's very easy for him to see his name written on it.

When you want to tell him to do something, don't just tell him, and then tell him again, and then threaten to get the paddle.

Get the paddle in your hand, and make sure he can see it clearly, BEFORE you tell him what to do.

You could get right up in his face and say, "I've got this paddle with your name on it. Now, you are going to do exactly what I tell you to do, or else I'm going to beat your butt. Do you understand me?"

You don't have to shout. Speak gently and calmly, but with a commanding tone.

The spanking itself is a form of "communication," but the THREAT of a spanking is even more so. The threat might even be more effective than the spanking itself.

But in order for the threat-of-a-spanking to be effective, he has to believe you are serious about spanking him.

DON'T wait until he continues to be disobedient or defiant for some period of time, and then try to make a big production out of beating his butt. INSTEAD OF THAT, give him small commands often, and a quick smack or two when he doesn't respond immediately.

Suppose you tell him, "It's time for your bath now," and he says, "In a few minutes." Just say, "I'm getting your paddle," and go get it out from wherever it's "hidden." He should start moving immediately at that point. If not, he gets a whack or two, and you tell him again what he has to do.

You should keep the paddle out of sight, UNTIL you want to threaten an immediate spanking. This way, the act of getting it out of its hiding place, and TELLING HIM that you're getting it, will have an effect that it could not have if you left it on display all the time.

You have to be UNAPOLOGETIC about spanking him. DON'T say, "Come on now, I don't want to have to get the paddle! Come on now, I don't want to have to give you a spanking!"

Just say, "I'm getting the paddle!" and quickly get it in your hand so he can see it. DON'T "beg him" to obey you. And don't wait until you are furious.

You might end up actually spanking him less, and getting better cooperation, if you "communicate" your seriousness up-front.

His defiance or disobedience is basically a "misunderstanding." He has the illusion in his mind that you WON'T SPANK HIM, because the last time you spanked him was "so long ago." And you have the illusion in your mind that he WILL OBEY YOU, because you spanked him so recently.

As for actually spanking him, you could still primarily use your hand. The paddle is meant to be symbolic. He should feel the paddle on his bare butt enough to sting, enough so he associates seeing the paddle with getting a spanking. But with any implement, you have to worry about causing an injury. With your hand, at least you have more control.

You can smack him with your hand, and not just on the butt but on the legs. Or you could have a wooden spoon, or a fly-swatter, or a belt folded-up and used lightly.

I had a problem with the fly-swatter recently, because I was experimenting by taping two of them together, and whacking the front of my leg to see how it worked. I ended up cutting my leg with it, so that it drew blood.

With any implement, we have to be very careful. I ended up hitting my leg with the handle, instead of the end-piece. Carol warned me about plastic being "sharp," and I didn't know what she meant. Well, now I know.

Anyhow, you can use these implements, but be careful with them.

Use the paddle to SHOW him that you are prepared to spank him. Get it out of its hiding place WITHIN SECONDS of not getting the proper response. Sometimes you can get it in your hand before you even START telling him what to do. But you can do most of the actual spanking with your hand, even though you have the paddle as a "visual signalling device."

Of course, when he wants something from you, YOU can say, "In a minute." And maybe he has a good reason for saying that, also. But his "good reason" is less important than his obedience.

Any refusal or hesitation, anything short of instant obedience, you say "I'm getting the paddle!" And then you quickly get that paddle in your hand, so he can see it. Even if he suddenly starts moving fast, you should still get it out, and make sure he sees that paddle in your hand, because you TOLD HIM YOU WOULD GET IT.

Bruce Everiss #conspiracy bruceonpolitics.com

Ken Livingstone is right

Ken Livingstone is obnoxious, the sort of nasty champagne socialist who has caused immense damage to Great Britain. But this is no good reason to suspend him from the Labour Party. His suspension is for “racism”. So let’s take a look at what he said. A full transcript is in the Independent (you can read it by clicking here) and here is the key extract:

“I’ve been in the Labour party for 47 years; I’ve never heard anyone say anything antisemitic. I’ve heard a lot of criticism of the state of Israel and its abuse of Palestinians but I’ve never heard anyone say anything antisemitic. It’s completely over the top but it’s not antisemitism. Let’s remember when Hitler won his election in 1932, his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel. He was supporting Zionism – this before he went mad and ended up killing six million Jews.”

And this is true. Hitler’s Nazi government had an agreement with the Zionists to ship German Jews to Israel, it was called the Haavara Agreement (click here to see the Wiki about it) and operated between 1933 and 1939, transporting approximately 60,000 Jews (proof can be found by clicking here).

So what is going on? To understand all this we have to know what racism really is, because the term is massively abused by politicians and the media. Oxford Dictionaries say it is: “Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior.” With a second definition: “The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races”. So this perfectly describes the white supremacists in America who believe that black people are genetically inferior. Or Hitler believing that German Aryans were a super race. It certainly in no way can be applied to what Ken Livingstone said. So what is going on?

1) Many people in the Labour Party object very strongly to having Jeremy Corbyn as their leader and are plotting like crazy to get rid of him. Corbyn and Livingstone are good friends so attacking Livingstone is an excellent proxy for attacking Corbyn. So it was no surprise when all the usual suspects within Labour rapidly came out vociferously against Livingstone in an orchestrated manner. Corbyn defused this by suspending Livingstone, because he knows that a reinstatement is inevitable. It is also worth looking at who the Labour Friends of Israel are.

2) Labour is the party of Islam in Britain (you can read my article explaining this by clicking here) and Livingstone was speaking in support of Naz Shah, a Muslim Labour MP who was vociferous about Israeli genocide (look the word up in a dictionary) of the Palestinians.

3) The British establishment is owned by the Zionists. They own the Conservative Party (you can read my article explaining this by clicking here). They own or control many newspapers. And many Zionists are in key positions at the BBC. All these Zionists descended on Livingstone like a ton of bricks because he is against the suppression of the Palestinians by a racist, fascist, apartheid Israeli state.

4) We have lots of elections coming up. The Welsh and Scottish Assemblies, Crime Commissioners, London Mayor and a huge swathe of local elections. The Conservatives want to do well in these and Labour don’t want to be obliterated (except for London Mayor, London is a Muslim city now for electoral purposes). This is one reason why the Conservatives jumped on Livingstone so quickly and why Corbyn suspended him so quickly. They both think this story could influence voting intentions.

5) The Zionists in Britain hate all criticism of the pariah Israeli state, so they are trying to have all criticism of Israel classed as being racism. This is ridiculous and is an attempt to take away our rights to free speech. Their first big move in this direction is their demand that anti Zionism be regarded as being the same as anti Semitism. Utterly absurd. There are many Jews who are not Zionists and there are many Zionists (mainly in USA) who are not Jews. Zionism is an evil fascist political movement and has many very good reasons to be criticised. It is worth noting here that Zionism is genuinely racist and meets the definition at the top of the article. Zionism is described by Theodor Herzl’s book Der Judenstaat, which sought to steal a Jewish homeland from the Palestinians purely on the basis of race. In fact there are many ways that Zionism can be accurately compared with Nazism (click here for a list).

It will be interesting to see which way this goes, it could be a brief squall in a teacup or it could completely redefine the British attitude towards Israel. Certainly very many people on all sides of the argument can be criticised over these events. But Ken is not one of them.

Ability-King-KK #sexist #homophobia deviantart.com

(Context: There's an animated show called RWBY; in a recent season, an antagonist named Adam is killed by two of the protagonists, Blake and Yang, the former of whom is his abuse victim. Since his death, there has been backlash from incels and homophobes who defended his actions and taking their anger out of Blake and Yang's ship, nicknamed Bumblebee. This is one of many examples of this backlash.)


Mojomito: Some of ya'll are completely missing the point...
Its not because of bumblebee, it's because the shirt is pretty insensitive regarding abusive relationships. Blake & Adam had an abusive relationship from the start - that's why she left. Adam wanted to control her and later in volume 3 & 6 he emotionally and physically abused her. "A lover's quarrel" downplays the fact that Adam practically groomed the much younger Blake, manipulated her and his physical abuse, suggesting it was merely a small trouble.
An Adam shirt is fine, a shirt that glosses over the abusive nature of Blake and Adam's relationship is not.

Ability-King-KK: It is because of Bumblebee. Adam was never abusive toward Blake, but he was turned into an abuser to please the Bumblebee shippers. To Bumblebee shippers, Adam is an obstacle that needed to be taken out of the picture. Hell, Blake and Adam's relationship could have stayed as student and mentor like Monty wanted and the Bumblebee shippers would still bitch. So don't try and defend this as if Rooster Teeth did the right thing.

Mojomito: Adam literally stabbed her?
What evidence of that do you have??
In the Black Trailer you can clearly see Blake is uncomfortable with Adam's forcefulness and violent ways, leading up to her decision to leave. If everything was happy with Adam, why did she leave?
How do you know what Monty wanted? Are you a personal friend of his with whom he shared his ideas? Fans throw around "Monty's ideas" without actually ever knowing Monty or his vision for the series,
I don't trust the opinions of people who claim to know what Monty wanted and constantly whine about how things used to be before Monty died.
Too late?? My first defensive comment was posted hours ago. Honestly, without the "Lovers Quarrel" I think the shirt would've been fine. I don't think sexual and domestic abuse is a topic that should be taken lightly and if your
only response to that is to call me "Snowflake" for having paper thin feelings, perhaps you should check yourself and all the dudes crying and whining over one (1) shirt being taken down and removed from a store.

Ability-King-KK: "In the Black Trailer you can clearly see Blake is uncomfortable with Adam's forcefulness and violent ways, leading up to her decision to leave. If everything was happy with Adam, why did she leave?"
That doesn't mean they were together in a romantic sense. Not everything has to be about shipping. Had it ever occurred to you that maybe Blake left because she didn't want to be a part of that version of the White Fang? She clearly doesn't share the same ideals as the White Fang, so why stick around?
"How do you know what Monty wanted?"
Ah, the same tired question every RWBY shipper uses to try and justify themselves. Any real fan would care about the story and character development, you know, what Monty tried to give us. Any real fan knows that Adam was never meant to be a psycho ex-boyfriend, you know, what Monty did give us. But unfortunately, after Monty's death, there was clearly a change in how RWBY was written and not for the better. Everything now is clearly there to cater to the shippers and that includes turning Adam into a psycho ex-boyfriend to help push Bumblebee.
Clearly you are being defensive. At no point did I even call you a "snowflake", but you're acting as if I did. And people aren't upset just because one shirt got taken down. They're upset because of WHY it was taken down, WHO Rooster Teeth would rather listen to, and the fact that Rooster Teeth are flat out ignoring more important criticisms.

Rvbomally #psycho #wingnut #racist #fundie deviantart.com


The year 2016 was a year of major shifts in politics, and the beginning of the end of the old order. The United Kingdom left the European Union, prompting the Netherlands and France to petition for their own exits. Against all odds, Donald Trump won the Republican nomination and then the presidency. He was unfortunate enough to have to deal with another recession - this time Chinese in origin - within a hundred days of his implementing extreme tariffs against Chinese goods. The beleaguered Chinese Communist Party decided to put the blame on the Americans, escalating tensions in the South China Sea, on the Korean Peninsula, and even against Russia. This policy proved unwise, as Trump was unwilling to back down and responded to provocation with more provocation. Before long, events escalated out of control, and by late 2017 the world was at war.

Russia and America joined forces against China, while the Americans turned a blind eye to the Polish-Russian invasion of Ukraine and the annexation of Belarus. Russo-American forces made great advances in China, but the desperate Chinese government retaliated by using its nuclear arsenal. The Russians and Americans responded with overwhelming force. Only a few Chinese missiles hit their targets, most of which were against foreign armies on Chinese soil, while the Americans and Russians devastated China in return (although the exchange remained limited). In the Middle East, Saudi Arabia - already abandoned by the Trump government - invaded Syria and Iraq to prevent the Russians and Iranians from gaining total hegemony. The Saudis were roundly defeated.

The global economy collapsed in the aftermath. The American government temporarily lost control as they scrambled to reorganize in Philadelphia. Trump's controversial and disastrous policies were widely unpopular; the nuclear attack on America was icing on the cake. State governments declared that they would not follow Trump any longer, Texas and California chief among them. With much of the American military destroyed in China, the federal government relied on loyal militias, some of which had their own agenda and used the civil war to carve out their own states. The federals secured the South against the neo-Confederates, but lost Texas to evangelicals, the West and New England to libertarian militias, and the Northwest to once-loyal white supremacist militias who saw Trump as too soft on the "racial question." Trump himself did away with the old government and, as his most ardent supporters wanted, proclaimed himself Emperor of the American Empire. In Russia, Putin did the same.

NATO and the European Union collapsed, and civil wars broke out across the European continent. Britain closed itself from the world, while nationalist and far-right organizations saw weakness in continental governments and began an armed uprising. The far left and Islamist groups retaliated, officially on behalf of the government, but fighting the government and one another just as often. Russia, seeing an opportunity to expand their influence, backed these groups and attempted to conquer the old Warsaw Pact. However, they were rebuffed by the Visegrad alliance, which became a close-knit alliance in the face of Russian invasion. The Russians were thrown out of Eastern Europe, while European nationalists secured their victory by using nuclear weapons they claimed to have acquired from old NATO bases (some evidence points to Russian involvement). In the wake of their victory, the nationalists exercised brutal reprisals against their enemies, real and perceived.

The Chinese Communist Party did not survive World War III. Years of warlordism followed the nuclear attack, as did starvation and disease. The Chinese population plummeted. However, the gender imbalance in the country continued despite the deaths of many young men in the war, and indeed got worse after the strikes against Chinese cities. Uniting many desperate, angry young men was the idea of a new, patriarchal Chinese empire, where they could form the ruling class and thus could pick as many women as they could. Influenced by the Western "manosphere," this movement became popular among many young men, thus allowing it to overpower its opponents and claim power. The Chinese also invaded their neighbors, explicitly to take their women; while successful in Mongolia and Korea, the Chinese were defeated in Vietnam, putting an end to their expansion and forcing the Chinese to lick their wounds and rebuild.

By 2042, the world has stabilized. The Russians and Indians are the most powerful societies on Earth, although the standard is not very high. The fighting in Europe and Asia has died down definitively, and the new orders are going strong. Most countries focus on rebuilding, particularly those devastated by WWIII. Poverty is widespread, protectionism is commonplace and global trade has collapsed, and much of the African and Asian continents are suffering from a wave of famine. Technology has stagnated since the 2020s, and few advancements have been made since; the American Empire is reinvestigating the EM drive, but little progress has been made. However, the Japanese have been successful at alternative reproduction, but the technology is taking a while to catch on elsewhere.

New religious movements have become popular, particularly the Cult of Kek and the Redpill Church. The Cult of Kek, arising out of an online meme, believes that through the use of "meme magic" - the constant repetition of something online - the ancient Egyptian god Kek will alter reality to suit their needs. The Cult has become popular simply because the events of the 21st century - known as "The Happening" among the Cult's members - were almost exactly what people online "memed" into existence, thus proving the religion correct. The Cult of Kek has many sects and forms, but most are loyal to the current alt-right new order and seek to further it.

The Redpill Church is one that arose out of certain portions of the online "Manosphere," and gained widespread acceptance in the aftermath of WWIII, particularly after the rise of the Chinese Empire. Teaching that women are biologically "hypergamous" - that is, almost parasitic upon men - the Redpill Church seeks to facilitate the final destruction of "gynocentric" society. This is facilitated through teaching by Redpill monks, who travel the world to preach the message. As with all religions, the Redpill Church is divided. Some sects believe that their goal is to enforce the current "patriarchy," while others believe that even the rise of the traditionalist regimes in the wake of WWIII is not enough, and others still want to do away with the need for women entirely through the use of artificial wombs.

Russia was not hit hard during WWIII, and while Putin has died, his image lives on as the father of the new Russian century. Tsarina Yekaterina, purported to be Vladimir Putin's daughter, holds the throne, but she has elected to be more of a figurehead and allow the oligarchs to run the country. Nonetheless, Russian authoritarianism has returned in full, based on a strange mix of Imperial and Soviet patriotism. Stalin is now a saint of the Russian Orthodox Church, now Russia's state religion. The Islamic minorities remain noisy, but given the sheer brutality of the Third Chechen War, they are wise enough not to start any violence against the government.

America remains shattered, and there are no signs that this will change. Emperor Donald I has perished, and his son, Donald II, has taken the throne, and there are those in the Empire who worry about the future of the monarchy if Donald II does not live up to his father's legacy. Given the major territorial losses suffered during the Second American Civil War, the Trump monarchy's greatest achievement - the Great Wall of America - does not exist within the Empire. The Empire, modeling itself off Rome, is a rather unpleasant absolute monarchy, where any opinion that dissents from the Trumpist line is punishable by imprisonment. The Lion Guard, ironically referred to as the "Trumpstaffel" by its detractors and its supporters, acts as a "private" enforcer of the regime.

Texas remains a democracy, although the only choices are "fundamentalist Christian" and "slightly less fundamentalist Christian." Formed by the evangelical factions of the Republican Party - opposed to Trump even before the civil war - Texas considers itself a shining city on a hill, the last bastion of true Americanism. It does maintain the Great Wall, but it has built walls of its own on its borders with the Empire. The Governor of Texas is all-powerful, with the legislature doing everything he wants. Christianity is the state religion, although Texas is protective of Jews, and atheism and Islam are banned outright.

The libertarian states on the continent - the Pacific States and New England - have formed a defensive alliance. Although starting out as a rag-tag group of states, the necessity of defending themselves from hostile neighbors have vastly increased the size of government, particularly the military. Both governments are now dominated by their militaries, which are the descendants of various militia groups, and are unfriendly to anti-libertarian political expression. However, both states do remain tolerant of foreign cultures - so long as they keep to themselves and participate in the economy - and while they discourage "statism," freedom of expression is still protected. A vast majority of the population is poor, and receive no aid whatsoever from the government.

In the Pacific Northwest, a white nationalist state has established itself. Originally supported by the Federal government, the Northwest Republic broke off and promptly expelled all non-whites and any whites who objected. Due to the major destruction the war and the purges caused to the rich coastal cities, and the pariah status the Northwest Republic has, it is an impoverished state, although it maintains a large military to remain a threat. Modeling itself somewhat off the Third Reich, the Northwest Republic is a single-party state with a single "President" at the top, and is closed off to all non-whites.

In Europe, nationalism reigns supreme, but in varying degrees of intensity. The United Kingdom remains a democracy, albeit an "emergency" one with a UKIP-Tory coalition in perpetual rule. The United Kingdom has taken a policy of "splendid isolation" with regard to the continent, and has expelled portions of its population that the government deemed "dangerous," but there are still some Eastern European and Middle Eastern communities on Great Britain (of course, they are thoroughly Anglicized). The European Brotherhood takes the position of pan-European nationhood, albeit one that respects the different cultures in Europe. The EB is practically a French empire, with a presidential dictatorship. The EB models itself off Rome, but local rights are respected - so long as the localities are European. Christianity is encouraged by the state, Islam is banned, and non-Europeans have been expelled from the country. The EB and the UK, while aligned, do have major differences of opinion on the question of the continued British occupation of northern France. In the East, the Visegrad Union promotes traditional European culture as a counterpoint to the current Russian regime. The Union is heavily Catholic, and even the current Pope is a conservative Pole.

The Nordic Union has taken a different track: the Nordics reject Christianity as a foreign religion, and have turned back to the worship of the Aesir. Believing themselves to be the successors of the old Norse, the Nordics are ashamed of their multicultural past (although they direct most of this at Sweden), and try to make themselves "suffer" to atone for it. This includes the belief in radical self-improvement as a vector for racial improvement as a whole; Nordic education involves a lot of reading esoteric works from men like Julius Evola, and a major focus on physical fitness. Then, there is the Fourth Reich, an openly neo-Nazi state that seeks to conquer Europe and exterminate the Jews. Already, the Reich has crushed all opposition within its borders, and only its isolation and relative weakness prevents it from waging a war of conquest.

Iran was the big winner in the Middle East, successfully defeating the Islamic State, the Kurds and the Saudis, and establishing friendly regimes in Iraq and Syria. Iran remains a Shia theocracy, and is attempting to impose this form of government on secular Iraq and Syria. However, their Russian allies caution them against inflaming religious tensions and possibly sparking another war in the region.

Military regimes returned in Egypt and North Africa after the recession of the Islamist tide. These brutal dictatorships make the Gaddafi regime seem humanitarian in comparison. They extremely anti-Islamic and have attacked mosques suspected of harboring members of the Muslim Brotherhood and other anti-government organizations. The most powerful regime among them is Egypt, which has made a somewhat successful attempt at securing hegemony over the region. The Egyptians have their eyes set on the rest of the Middle East, not out of expansionist desire, but because of what is going on in Arabia.

After the fall of the Islamic State, many of its fighters flooded into Saudi Arabia. The Saudi military, already hammered hard by Iranian and Russian forces, proved incapable of stopping them; indeed, many Saudi units defected. The Saudi monarchy was overthrown, as were the other Gulf monarchies, and a caliphate established to replace them. Ironically, little has changed in Saudi Arabia since the rise of the Islamic Federation, apart from the destruction of "Western" influence in cities such as Dubai, the destruction of "idolatrous artifacts" in Mecca and Medina, and the stricter enforcement of preexisting Islamic law.

South Africa has been placed under white rule, mostly by Europeans fleeing the chaos of the EU. The ANC government collapsed in the wake of WWIII, allowing the Europeans to take control of the cities, ironically with the aid of Russia. Apartheid has come back in full force, as the South African government believes that blacks are inherently incapable of governance. The remnants of the ANC disagree violently, and the South Africans are currently waging a brutal bush war against them.

The Chinese Empire is still licking its wounds. Draconian laws, akin to those of the Qin, have been scaled back by the most recent set of reforms, after the Chinese government realized that it may cause a revolt. The gender disparity is less of a problem now, although the Chinese still resort to imported sex bots and concubines to keep the powerful and the enforcers of the regime happy. The Chinese have done away with any child policy, seeing that as a vector for disaster, and now the Chinese population is booming. It has now exceeded pre-war levels, and now the issue is the lack of food, territory, and the continuing lack of women. The Chinese look outward for expansion, but have run out of easy targets.

India was a big winner in WWIII, indeed becoming a superpower by the 2030s. This did come at a cost: the famine of the 2020s hit hard, particularly India's poorest, but the fall of China allowed India to restructure its economy among more modern lines. It did so through Chinese-style modernization, and now India is the workshop of the world. India is still suffering from problems, such as the pollution, but now India is extending its influence into Africa with one mission: to take in more resources.

Scott Lively #fundie addictinginfo.org

Scott Lively, the infamous US pastor who instigated Uganda’s ‘Kill The Gays’ legislation says he isn’t ‘anti-gay.’

Lively, who is set to stand trial in the US for his contribution to human rights violations in Uganda, recently blogged about the evil liberal media’s attempt to make him seem like a bad guy, by referring to him as ‘anti-gay.’

According to Pink News, Lively wrote:

“Most irritating and misleading is that all or most of the stories identify me (often in the title) as ‘anti-gay pastor’, as if that were some sort of professional title rather than an editorial comment.

I strongly object to that characterization, which deliberately misrepresents my opposition to the mainstreaming of homosexual conduct as hatred of homosexual persons.

The term ‘anti-gay’ effectively mistranslates the pro-family motto ‘Love the Sinner, Hate the Sin,’ into ‘Hate the Sinner because of the Sin’.

“As such it is not an honest descriptor but a slur, and its use by the media is an act of complicity in a dishonest and manipulative LGBT political tactic.

“Much of what the public falsely believes they know about my views and actions in the culture war is the fruit of this tactic and similar manipulative spin by pro-‘gay’ journalists throughout the industry.”

Following his 2009 visit to Uganda, a government official was quoted as saying:

“We must exterminate homosexuals before they exterminate society.”

Lively posted an update to the ‘Defend the Family’ web page while he was still in Uganda, bragging of the impact his hate-speech had on the people there.

“my host and ministry partner in Kampala, Stephen Langa, was overjoyed with the results of our efforts and predicted confidently that the coming weeks would see significant improvement in the moral climate of the nation, and a massive increase in pro-family activism in every social sphere. He said that a respected observer of society in Kampala had told him that our campaign was like a nuclear bomb against the “gay” agenda in Uganda. I pray that this, and the predictions, are true.”

Shortly after, the ‘kill the gays’ bill was introduced.

Lively is being sued for his role in the persecution of LGBT citizens in Uganda. Incidents of persecution against gays in Uganda have been steadily increasing over the past half decade, since Lively and other right wing fanatics targeted the country as ripe for spreading their distorted gospel of hate. LGBT citizens are attacked, arrested, imprisoned and deprived of basic human rights, such as the right to housing and food and water.

Now that he’s being sued, he claims he’s not responsible for the suffering of the LGBT community, although he went to Uganda with the sole purpose of instigating hatred toward gays. The misinformation that he spread while he was in Uganda, a country in which more than half the population is age 15 or younger, led directly to the increase in persecution seen today.

Now that he’s being sued, he’s not bragging about the ‘nuclear bomb’ he set off in Uganda. In fact, he’s claiming that the rise in persecution of gays in the country had nothing to do with him.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

The Final Solution was financed by Spanish silver!!

The next great event that was prefigured in the Old Covenant is found in the Book of Esther. It is called the American Revolution, and was financed by silver from the slave labor silver mines of New Spain.

Around 400 BC, Jews throughout the entire world were threatened with a genuine holocaust masterminded by Haman–the prime minister of emperor Xerxes.

Haman told emperor Xerxes:

"If it pleases the king, let a decree be written that they (Jews) be destroyed, and I will pay ten thousand talents of silver into the hands of those who do the work, to bring it into the king’s treasuries" (Esther 3:9).

Haman was really into horoscopes and divination so he cast a horoscope for 12 months to find the lucky day for this Final Solution:

In the first month, that is the month Nisan, in the twelfth year of king Ahasuerus (Xerxes), they cast Pur, that is the horoscope, before Haman from day to day, and from month to month, to the twelfth month, that is the month Adar (Esther 3:7).

The Persian word Pur means casting a horoscope or divination by astrology:

You are wearied in the multitude of your counsels; let now the astrologers, the stargazers, and the monthly prognosticators stand up and save you from what shall come upon you (Isaiah 47:13).

The English word prognosticate, from the Latin prognosticum, means to augur, foretell, or vaticinate. Before Galileo "discovered" that the earth was rotating and not at the center of the universe, horoscopes were all the rage at the Vatican.

Haman's horoscope told him that the 13th day of the 12th month would be the "lucky day" for the Jewish holocaust:

And the letters were sent by posts into all the king's provinces, to destroy, to kill, and to cause to perish, all Jews, both young and old, little children and women, in one day, even upon the thirteenth day of the twelfth month, which is the month Adar, and to take the spoil of them for a prey (Esther 3:13).

On July 4, 1776, "representatives" of the 13 British colonies declared independence. Most of the people had no interest in the Revolution, and their only complaint with the British monarchy was the violation of their charters, which prohibited them from expanding to the Pacific Ocean.

From start to finish, the American Revolution was financed by the slave labor silver mines of New Spain.

The Final Solution was to deliver the 13 colonies to the Spanish Inquisition.

The transfer to Spanish sovereignty was to be completed by 1813.

By 1792, to the great surprise of most of the revolutionaries, the new states added 2 new members, increasing the number of states from the "unlucky" 13, to the "lucky" number 15.

The first official flag of the new United States had 15 stars and stripes.

The new state of Vermont was added in 1791, and Kentucky in 1792.

In the Holy Bible, 13 is the number for extermination of Israel, and 15 is the number for deliverance.

In the Flag Act of 1795, the official flag of the United States of Israel had 15 stars and stripes, and not the "unlucky" 13, which Haman's horoscope told him was the perfect day for the Final Solution.

This was the star-spangled banner that flew over Fort McHenry when Francis Scott Key wrote our national anthem.

A British spy named Samuel Chester Reid changed the flag back to 13 stripes in 1818.

On the 13th day of the 12th month all the Jews were as good as dead . . . but 3 days later deliverance came in a miraculous way:

But the Jews that were at Shushan assembled together on the thirteenth day thereof, and on the fourteenth thereof; and on the fifteenth day of the same they rested, and made it a day of feasting and gladness (Esther 9:18).
An annual feast called Purim was celebrated on the 15th day of the 12th month to commemorate this great deliverance from the planned Jewish holocaust.

The great Exodus from Egypt happened on the 15th day of the month. The full moon always falls on the 15th day of the lunar month.

Craig Weiler #fundie weilerpsiblog.wordpress.com

In my studies of psychic people I have come to understand that we are a minority group with the same pressures and problems of other minorities.

[...]

The comparison of gays and psychic people is a useful one:

Like gays, psychic people have the option of hiding who they are from the general public. There are no physical features of psychic people to give them away and the only way for people to find out is if the psychic gives away the secret.

Psychic people are unfairly portrayed as incompetent and flaky, crazy and deluded. Much as gays had to deal with a psychiatric evaluation as "abnormal" at best and "sexually deviant" at worst in years past, psychics have had to deal with the same level of misunderstanding in the present. In the field of psychology, it is assumed that there is something wrong with us. As I pointed out earlier, the pejorative term "magical thinking" is tossed about.

Psychic ability has been pushed underground and off to the fringes for the most part, with high profile psychics facing intense criticism and ridicule from the fanatical atheist James Randi and the pseudo skeptical organization CSI.

Most professional psychics toil in obscurity in an unregulated industry dotted with incompetence and the occasional outright frauds. In the public's eyes, they all tend to get lumped together. Like many small businesses, most fail within a couple of years to get established and the psychics move on to more profitable professions. Some stick it out and go on to have successful, if unremarkable careers. Psychics are limited in where they can advertise; not every publication will take their money because of their fringe status.

Moving away from professional psychics, another area where psychics struggle, just like gays, is that they have to find health professionals friendly to them. Not just anyone will do. If a psychic person confides a psychic experience to a doctor, he/she does not want to come away with a handful of anti-psychotic medication. The doctor has to know the difference.

Similarly, psychics in need of therapy will often have to search for psychic friendly therapists who will calmly accept psychic ability and its presence in treatment.

Both gays and psychic people tend not to advertise who they are for fear of disapproval, waiting instead to find out "who's cool." It is all very isolating and mentally unhealthy.

Like gays, many psychics suffer from self-loathing due to non-acceptance by authority in our society. Many people keep their psychic abilities secret due to fear of losing their jobs or status or both. They don't want the "crazy" label.

Both have organizations pitted against them. Gays have the evangelical Christian churches trying to "pray away the gay" and psychics have JREF and CSI and their satellite skeptic groups trying to paint them as frauds or delusional. Both the Christian and the atheist organizations come from the standpoint that they are "helping."

Interestingly, both the fundamentalist Christian and skeptic organizations rely on pseudo-science, hypocrisy and double standards to achieve their goals; the difference being that skeptics have far more support from the scientific community at large. I forgot to add, evangelical Christians aren't exactly our friends; they think we're in league with the Devil or something. They do respect psychic ability though, so I suppose that's a positive of sorts.

Phil Elmore #fundie wnd.com

The latest deviancy they're trying to mainstream

Exclusive: Phil Elmore sees 'furry' perversion as next crack in society's foundation

Emily Gaudette, writing for Inverse, said it best early last month: “When Disney released an explanatory teaser for 2016’s ‘Zootopia,’ one could almost hear the sound of a billion DeviantArt accounts whirring to life. … The film’s teaser alone reads like an explanation of the furry manifesto: that anthropomorphized animals can be sexualized and identified with as easily as humans. … Could it be a coincidence that Disney chose a fox protagonist for its first fully anthro feature, considering foxes are arguably the most popular ‘fursona’ cited by furries? Many furries name the hero of Disney’s animated Robin Hood, also a fox, when recalling their first sexual feelings for anthropomorphized animals.”

Wait, what? Yes, you read that correctly: Disney’s new film, “Zootopia,” is arguably an attempt to mainstream “furry” sexuality – the practice of dressing up in fuzzy animal mascot costumes in order to engage in one’s perverted, prurient practices. This column has profiled the intersection between “furry” perversion and left-wing politics before. Already, the “otherkin” movement, in which various losers redefine themselves in terms of the animals and fantasy characters with which they “identify,” are posting lists of their preferred pronouns on their self-absorbed blogs. That’s where it starts. The more society in general becomes aware of this movement, the more it will creep into the mainstream of popular culture. Once lodged there, it will be impossible to root out, and society will be that much weaker for it.

When the debate over Obamacare produced the “Pajama Boy” meme, right-thinking people reacted in horror at the emasculation this imagery represented. It juvenilized young adults in a way that any real grownup would find repugnant. That is, after all, what the push toward societal acceptance – be it for furries, “otherkin,” “bronies,” transgenders, or some other sexually delusional perversion – is all about. If masculinity is the fuel on which society runs, on which innovation occurs, on which industries are built and on which wars are fought to protect a free people, then feminism, liberalism, furries, bronies, transgenders and the Star Wars cantina of progressive freaks with body image issues and self-esteem deficits is the sugar in society’s gas tank. Progressives hate themselves, so they invent new sexual personas and new deviancies to keep themselves entertained. Liberals hate families and decency, so they champion sexual perversion and child molestation while holding it up as viable “other” sexuality. Can there really be any doubt that the majority of “furries” are likely pedophiles?

As social media is used to promulgate countless delusional, perverted indulgences, society suffers. By embracing “furries” and other perverts, we are producing a population of incapable, weak-minded children. As our culture sags under the weight of these useless Pajama Boys and Pajama Girls, it is no wonder, then, that our foundations are beginning to show serious cracks. The mainstreaming of “furries” is the furthering of liberal destruction of society. It presages the extinction of the rational, responsible adults who once formed the backbone of our nation. This destruction started on social media, and it is there that this battle was, is and will be fought.

Sue Bohlin #fundie probe.org

Sue Bohlin looks a common myths concerning homosexual behavior that are prevalent in our society. These myths prevent us from looking at homosexuality with a biblical worldview and from dealing with this sin in a loving and consistent manner.

In this essay we’ll be looking at some of the homosexual myths that have pervaded our culture, and hopefully answering their arguments. Much of this material is taken from Joe Dallas’ excellent book, A Strong Delusion: Confronting the “Gay Christian” Movement.{1} While the information in this essay may prove helpful, it is our prayer that you will be able to share it calmly and compassionately, remembering that homosexuality isn’t just a political and moral issue; it is also about people who are badly hurting.

10% of the Population Is Homosexual.

In 1948, Dr. Alfred Kinsey released a study called Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, claiming that between 10 and 47% of the male population was homosexual.{2} He got his figures from a pool of 5,300 male subject that he represented as your average “Joe College” student. Many of the men who gave him the data, though, actually consisted of sex offenders, prisoners, pimps, hold-up men, thieves, male prostitutes and other criminals, and hundreds of gay activists.{3} The 10% figure was widely circulated by Harry Hay, the father of the homosexual “civil rights” movement, urging that homosexuality be seen no longer as an act of sodomy but as a 10% minority class.{4}

Kinsey’s figures were exposed as completely false immediately afterwards, and by many other scientists since. The actual figure is closer to 2-3%.{5} But the 10% number has been so often reported in the press that most people think it’s valid. It’s not.

People Are Born Gay.

Ann Landers said it, and millions of people believe it. The problem is, the data’s not there to support it. There are three ways to test for inborn traits: twin studies, brain dissections, and gene “linkage” studies.{6} Twin studies show that something other than genetics must account for homosexuality, because nearly half of the identical twin studied didn’t have the same sexual preference. If homosexuality were inherited, identical twins should either be both straight or both gay. Besides, none of the twin studies have been replicated, and other twin studies have produced completely different results.{7} Dr. Simon LeVay’s famous study on the brains of dead subjects yielded questionable results regarding its accuracy. He wasn’t sure of the sexual orientation of the people in the study, and Dr. LeVay even admits he doesn’t know if the changes in the brain structures were the cause *of* homosexuality, or caused *by* homosexuality.{8} Finally, an early study attempting to show a link between homosexuality and the X-chromosome has yet to be replicated, and a second study actually contradicted the findings of the first.{9} Even if homosexuality were someday proven to be genetically related, *inborn* does not necessarily mean *normal*. Some children are born with cystic fibrosis, but that doesn’t make it a normal condition.

Inborn tendencies toward certain behaviors (such as homosexuality) do not make those behaviors moral. Tendencies toward alcoholism, obesity, and violence are now thought to be genetically influenced, but they are not good behaviors. People born with tendencies toward these behaviors have to fight hard against their natural temptations to drunkenness, gluttony, and physical rage.

And since we are born as sinners into a fallen world, we have to deal with the consequences of the Fall. Just because we’re born with something doesn’t mean it’s normal. It’s not true that “God makes some people gay.” All of us have effects of the Fall we need to deal with.

What’s Wrong with Two Loving, Committed Men or Women Being Legally Married?

There are two aspects to marriage: the legal and the spiritual. Marriage is more than a social convention, like being “best friends” with somebody, because heterosexual marriage usually results in the production of children. Marriage is a legal institution in order to offer protection for women and children. Women need to have the freedom to devote their time and energies to be the primary nurturers and caretakers of children without being forced to be breadwinners as well. God’s plan is that children grow up in families who provide for them, protect them, and wrap them in security.

Because gay or lesbian couples are by nature unable to reproduce, they do not need the legal protection of marriage to provide a safe place for the production and raising of children. Apart from the sexual aspect of a gay relationship, what they have is really “best friend” status, and that does not require legal protection.

Of course, a growing number of gay couples are seeking to have a child together, either by adoption, artificial insemination, or surrogate mothering. Despite the fact that they have to resort to an outside procedure in order to become parents, the presence of adults plus children in an ad hoc household should not automatically secure official recognition of their relationship as a family. There is a movement in our culture which seeks to redefine “family” any way we want, but with a profound lack of discernment about the long-term effects on the people involved. Gay parents are making a dangerous statement to their children: lesbian mothers are saying that fathers are not important, and homosexual fathers are saying that mothers are not important. More and more social observers see the importance of both fathers and mothers in children’s lives; one of their roles is to teach boys what it means to be a boy and teach girls what it means to be a girl.

The other aspect of marriage is of a spiritual nature. Granted, this response to the gay marriage argument won’t make any difference to people who are unconcerned about spiritual things, but there are a lot of gays who care very deeply about God and long for a relationship with Him. The marriage relationship, both its emotional and especially its sexual components, is designed to serve as an earthbound illustration of the relationship between Christ and His bride, the church.{10} Just as there is a mystical oneness between a man and a woman, who are very different from each other, so there is a mystical unity between two very different, very “other” beings–the eternal Son of God and us mortal, creaturely humans. Marriage as God designed it is like the almost improbable union of butterfly and buffalo, or fire and water. But homosexual relationships are the coming together of two like individuals; the dynamic of unity and diversity in heterosexual marriage is completely missing, and therefore so is the spiritual dimension that is so intrinsic to the purpose of marriage. Both on an emotional and a physical level, the sameness of male and male, or female and female, demonstrates that homosexual relationships do not reflect the spiritual parable that marriage is meant to be. God wants marriage partners to complement, not to mirror, each other. The concept of gay marriage doesn’t work, whether we look at it on a social level or a spiritual one.

Jesus Said Nothing about Homosexuality.

Whether from a pulpit or at a gay rights event, gay activists like to point out that Jesus never addressed the issue of homosexuality; instead, He was more interested in love. Their point is that if Jesus didn’t specifically forbid a behavior, then who are we to judge those who engage in it?

This argument assumes that the Gospels are more important than the rest of the books in the New Testament, that only the recorded sayings of Jesus matter. But John’s gospel itself assures us that it is not an exhaustive record of all that Jesus said and did, which means there was a lot left out!{11} The gospels don’t record that Jesus condemned wife-beating or incest; does that make them OK? Furthermore, the remaining books of the New Testament are no less authoritative than the gospels. All scripture is inspired by God, not just the books with red letters in the text. Specific prohibitions against homosexual behavior in Romans 1:26-27 and 1 Corinthians 6:9,10 are every bit as God-ordained as what is recorded in the gospels.

We do know, however, that Jesus spoke in specific terms about God’s created intent for human sexuality: “From the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; and the two shall be one flesh. . . What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder” (Matt. 19:4-6). God’s plan is holy heterosexuality, and Jesus spelled it out.

The Levitical laws against homosexual behavior are not valid today.

Leviticus 18:22 says, “Thou shalt not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; it is an abomination.” Gay theologians argue that the term “abomination” is generally associated with idolatry and the Canaanite religious practice of cult prostitution, and thus God did not prohibit the kind of homosexuality we see today.

Other sexual sins such as adultery and incest are also prohibited in the same chapters where the prohibitions against homosexuality are found. All sexual sin is forbidden by both Old and New Testament, completely apart from the Levitical codes, because it is a moral issue. It is true that we are not bound by the rules and rituals in Leviticus that marked Yahweh’s people by their separation from the world; however, the nature of sexual sin has not changed because immorality is an affront to the holiness and purity of God Himself. Just because most of Leviticus doesn’t apply to Christians today doesn’t mean none of it does.

The argument that the word “abomination” is connected with idolatry is well answered by examining Proverbs 6:16-19, which describes what else the Lord considers abominations: a proud look, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises evil imaginations, feet that are swift in running to mischief, a false witness that speaks lies, and a man who sows discord among brothers. Idolatry plays no part in these abominations. The argument doesn’t hold water.

If the practices in Leviticus 18 and 20 are condemned because of their association with idolatry, then it logically follows that they would be permissible if they were committed apart from idolatry. That would mean incest, adultery, bestiality, and child sacrifice (all of which are listed in these chapters) are only condemned when associated with idolatry; otherwise, they are allowable. No responsible reader of these passages would agree with such a premise.{12}

Calling Homosexuality a Sin Is Judging, and Judging Is a Sin.

Josh McDowell says that the most often-quoted Bible verse used to be John 3:16, but now that tolerance has become the ultimate virtue, the verse we hear quoted the most is “Judge not, lest ye be judged” (Matt. 7:1). The person who calls homosexual activity wrong is called a bigot and a homophobe, and even those who don’t believe in the Bible can be heard to quote the “Judge not” verse.

When Jesus said “Do not judge, or you too will be judged,” the context makes it plain that He was talking about setting ourselves up as judge of another person, while blind to our own sinfulness as we point out another’s sin. There’s no doubt about it, there is a grievous amount of self-righteousness in the way the church treats those struggling with the temptations of homosexual longings. But there is a difference between agreeing with the standard of Scripture when it declares homosexuality wrong, and personally condemning an individual because of his sin. Agreeing with God about something isn’t necessarily judging.

Imagine I’m speeding down the highway, and I get pulled over by a police officer. He approaches my car and, after checking my license and registration, he says, “You broke the speed limit back there, ma’am.” Can you imagine a citizen indignantly leveling a politically correct charge at the officer: “Hey, you’re judging me! Judge not, lest ye be judged!'” The policeman is simply pointing out that I broke the law. He’s not judging my character, he’s comparing my behavior to the standard of the law. It’s not judging when we restate what God has said about His moral law, either. What is sin is to look down our noses at someone who falls into a different sin than we do. That’s judging.

The Romans 1 Passage on Homosexuality Does Not Describe True Homosexuals, but Heterosexuals Who Indulge in Homosexual Behavior That Is Not Natural to Them.

Romans 1:26-27 says, “God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.” Some gay theologians try to get around the clear prohibition against both gay and lesbian homosexuality by explaining that the real sin Paul is talking about here is straight people who indulge in homosexual acts, because it’s not natural to them. Homosexuality, they maintain, is not a sin for true homosexuals.

But there is nothing in this passage that suggests a distinction between “true” homosexuals and “false” ones. Paul describes the homosexual behavior itself as unnatural, regardless of who commits it. In fact, he chooses unusual words for men and women, Greek words that most emphasize the biology of being a male and a female. The behavior described in this passage is unnatural for males and females; sexual orientation isn’t the issue at all. He is saying that homosexuality is biologically unnatural; not just unnatural to heterosexuals, but unnatural to anyone.

Furthermore, Romans 1 describes men “inflamed with lust” for one another. This would hardly seem to indicate men who were straight by nature but experimenting with gay sex.{13} You really have to do some mental gymnastics to make Romans 1 anything other than what a plain reading leads us to understand all homosexual activity is sin.

Preaching Against Homosexuality Causes Gay Teenagers to Commit Suicide.

I received an e-mail from someone who assured me that the blood of gay teenagers was on my hands because saying that homosexuality is wrong makes people kill themselves. The belief that gay teenagers are at high risk for suicide is largely inspired by a 1989 report by a special federal task force on youth and suicide. This report stated three things; first, that gay and lesbian youths account for one third of all teenage suicides; second, that suicide is the leading cause of death among gay teenagers, and third, gay teens who commit suicide do so because of “internalized homophobia” and violence directed at them.{14} This report has been cited over and over in both gay and mainstream publications.

San Francisco gay activist Paul Gibson wrote this report based on research so shoddy that when it was submitted to Dr. Louis Sullivan, the former Secretary of Health and Human Services, Dr. Sullivan officially distanced himself and his department from it.{15} The report’s numbers, both its data and its conclusions, are extremely questionable. Part of the report cites an author claiming that as many as 3,000 gay youths kill themselves each year. But that’s over a thousand more than the total number of teen suicides in the first place! Gibson exaggerated his numbers when he said that one third of all teen suicides are committed by gay youth. He got this figure by looking at gay surveys taken at drop- in centers for troubled teens, many of which were gay-oriented, which revealed that gay teens had two to four times the suicidal tendencies of straight kids. Gibson multiplied this higher figure by the disputed Kinsey figure of a 10% homosexual population to produce his figure that 30% of all youth suicides are gay. David Shaffer, a Columbia University psychiatrist who specializes in teen suicides, pored over this study and said, “I struggled for a long time over Gibson’s mathematics, but in the end, it seemed more hocus-pocus than math.”{16}

The report’s conclusions are contradicted by other, more credible reports. Researchers at the University of California-San Diego interviewed the survivors of 283 suicides for a 1986 study. 133 of those who died were under 30, and only 7 percent were gay and they were all over 21. In another study at Columbia University of 107 teenage boy suicides, only three were known to be gay, and two of those died in a suicide pact. When the Gallup organization interviewed almost 700 teenagers who knew a teen who had committed suicide, not one mentioned sexuality as part of the problem. Those who had come close to killing themselves mainly cited boy-girl problems or low self-esteem.{17}

Gibson didn’t use a heterosexual control group in his study. Conclusions and statistics are bound to be skewed without a control group. When psychiatrist David Shaffer examined the case histories of the gay teens who committed suicides in Gibson’s report, he found the same issues that straight kids wrestle with before suicide: “The stories were the same: a court appearance scheduled for the day of the death; prolonged depression; drug and alcohol problems; etc.”{18}

That any teenager experiences so much pain that he takes his life is a tragedy, regardless of the reason. But it’s not fair to lay the responsibility for gay suicides, the few that there are, on those who agree with God that it’s wrong and harmful behavior.

Anonymous Shooter #fundie legalinsurrection.com

Can everyone CALM DOWN? Those who work and volunteer at the Volusia County’s Republican Party headquarters, located in Florida, discovered their office vandalized.
Vandals shot out the windows and people discovered four bullet holes inside the office.

From The Daytona Beach News-Journal:
Inside, volunteers pointed to bullet holes in the walls and ceiling.

“We have never had any kind of vandalism before at a Republican Headquarters,” Tony Ledbetter, the chairman of Volusia County’s Republican Party, said in an email Monday morning. “It’s a small strip center and no other business was vandalized, so it was obviously politically motivated.”

Ledbetter said he was the last to leave the GOP headquarters at 4 p.m. Sunday and workers in the adjacent businesses, including an e-cigarette store, a restaurant and a massage business, had closed by 10 p.m. No one heard shots fired and there were no injuries.

That means the incident took place after 4PM on Sunday. Police Captain Mark Cheatham said law enforcement has determined “at least four rounds were fired into the building” and they’re still tracking down video. They do not have any witnesses.

The shooting comes after law enforcement arrested Cesar Sayoc for mailing suspicious packages to Democrats.
Jewel Dickson, the Volusia Democratic Party chair, said that the group finds the actions “appalling” and takes it as a “sign of things going wrong.” However, she said she “would not be quick to blame a Democrat for doing that” because “t could be anybody angry.”

“The state of our political discourse in America is an embarrassment to all parties and those involved in the political process,” stated Florida state Rep. Tom Leek. “Neither Democrats nor Republicans own the high ground on this issue. Sooner or later, both parties are going to have to stop suffering idiots within their own party, and cast them out on their own.”

Sue Bohlin #fundie blogs.bible.org

A recent email from a friend: "Sue, I'm seeing more and more 'evangelical' churches come out in support of gay marriage. Also, Christian friends are changing their views on the validity of the LGBT lifestyle being acceptable for a Christ-follower. I start worrying that I'm missing something, and even start questioning my beliefs."

No, my dear friend, you are not missing something, but it is a good time to question (not doubt) your beliefs so you can be more convinced than ever that the Creator God has not changed and neither has His word.

I think there are two big reasons so many confessing believers in Christ have allowed themselves to be more shaped by the culture than by the truth of God's word, drifting into spiritual compromise and even into apostasy (abandoning the truth of one's faith). This is not a new problem; the apostle Paul urged his readers in Rome, "Don't let the world around you squeeze you into its own mold, but let God re-mold your minds from within. . ." (Romans 12:2, Phillips).

Reason One: Rejecting the Authority of God's Word

The bitter fruit of several decades of shallow preaching, teaching and discipleship is that many believers have been especially vulnerable to Satan's deceptive question to Eve in the Garden of Eden: "Did God really say . . .?" When Christians ignore or flat-out reject the unmistakably clear biblical statements condemning homosexual relationships, they are playing into the enemy's temptation to justify disobedience by making feelings and perceptions more important than God's design and standards.

There are now two streams of thought on same-sex relationships and behavior, the Traditional View and the Revisionist View. The Revisionist View basically says, "It doesn't matter what the Bible actually says, it doesn't mean what 2000 years of church history has said it means, it means what we want it to say."

People are redefining the Bible, gender and marriage according to what will let them do what they want, when they should (in my opinion) be asking the insightful question posed by Paul Mooris in Shadow of Sodom, "[A]m I trying to interpret Scripture in the light of my proclivity, or should I interpret my proclivity in the light of Scripture?"

The Bible:
Traditional View
The Bible is inspired by a Holy God and is inherently true and trustworthy. The Bible is written by men, but divinely inspired by the Holy Spirit and is sealed by a God of truth and authority.
Revisionist View
The scriptures which traditional Christianity understands to condemn homosexuality [such as Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13; Romans 1:26-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 1:9-10] have either been mistranslated, yanked out of context or were only appropriate to the culture of that time. Therefore, we no longer have to follow passages we don't like.

Sexuality:
Traditional View
Sexuality and sex are God's good gifts to men and women. While sexuality is an essential attribute of human nature, our Creator did not intend it to be the defining characteristic of humanity.
Revisionist View
Sexuality—the feelings and attractions one feels for other people—is God ordained, diverse, deeply personal and morally permissible. One's sexual orientation, whatever it is, should be celebrated as one of God's good gifts.

Gender:
Traditional View
God created both male and female in His image, and each gender reflects different aspects of the imago Dei. God's sovereign choice of gender for every person reflects His intention for that person's identity; it is one of the ways in which he or she glorifies Him as Creator.
Revisionist View
We are free to make a distinction between sex and gender. Sex is biological maleness or femaleness at birth, and gender is how one feels about their "true" maleness or femaleness internally. Based on Galatians 3:28, "there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."

Marriage:
Traditional View
Marriage is God-ordained between one man and one woman in a lifelong, monogamous, covenantal relationship. The Bible begins with the marriage of Adam and Eve, and ends with the marriage of the Lamb (Jesus) and the Bride (the church). The complementarity of husband and wife express God's intention of both genders in marriage.
Revisionist View
Homosexual behavior is appropriate within the confines of a committed, loving, monogamous, lifelong, Christ-centered relationship.

Both individual Christians and churches have drifted into endorsing same-sex relationships because it always feels better to follow one's flesh than to follow Jesus' call to "deny yourself, take up your cross and follow Me" (Matt. 16:24).

Reason Two: Snagged by the Gay Agenda

In addition to those several decades of shallow preaching, teaching and discipleship I mentioned earlier, many believers have not been submitting themselves to the truth of the Word of God. By default, then, they were easily shaped and swayed by the six points of a brilliantly designed "Gay Manifesto" spelled out in a book called After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s. Originally published as an essay called "The Overhauling of Straight America" that was published in a gay magazine, the authors laid out this plan which has been executed perfectly in the United States. (The quotes below are from the essay, found here)

1. Desensitization and normalization of homosexuals in mainstream America. Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and often as possible.

"The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among your acquaintances.

"In the early stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the masses should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself. Instead, the imagery of sex should be downplayed and gay rights should be reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible. First let the camel get his nose inside the tent—only later his unsightly derriere!"

2. Portray members of the LGBTQ community as victims. Indoctrinate mainstream America that members of the LGBTQ community were "born this way."

"In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector."

"Now, there are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are worth communicating. First, the mainstream should be told that gays are victims of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject their sexual preference. The message must read: 'As far as gays can tell, they were born gay, just as you were born heterosexual or white or black or bright or athletic. Nobody ever tricked or seduced them; they never made a choice, and are not morally blameworthy. What they do isn't willfully contrary - it's only natural for them. This twist of fate could as easily have happened to you!'"

3. Give protectors a just cause: anti-discrimination

"Our campaign should not demand direct support for homosexual practices, should instead take anti-discrimination as its theme."

4. The use of TV, music, film and social media to desensitize mainstream Americans to their plight as gay people

Over the past 25 years, gay characters, on TV especially, have captured the hearts of American viewers because they were attractive, funny, smart—the kind of characters viewers would like to be. No one was shown the dark underside of gay bars and bathhouses, or same-sex domestic violence, or having to get one's HIV+ status checked.

5. Portray gays and lesbians as pillars in society. Make gays look good.

"From Socrates to Shakespeare, from Alexander the Great to Alexander Hamilton, from Michelangelo to Walt Whitman, from Sappho to Gertrude Stein, the list is old hat to us but shocking news to heterosexual America. In no time, a skillful and clever media campaign could have the gay community looking like the veritable fairy godmother to Western Civilization."

Use celebrities and celebrity endorsement. And who doesn't love Ellen DeGeneres?

6. Once homosexuals have begun to gain acceptance, anti-gay opponents must be vilified, causing them to be viewed as repulsive outcasts of society.

"Our goal is here is twofold. First, we seek to replace the mainstream's self-righteous pride about its homophobia with shame and guilt. Second, we intend to make the antigays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from such types.

"The public should be shown images of ranting homophobes whose secondary traits and beliefs disgust middle America. These images might include: the Ku Klux Klan demanding that gays be burned alive or castrated; bigoted southern ministers drooling with hysterical hatred to a degree that looks both comical and deranged; menacing punks, thugs, and convicts speaking coolly about the 'fags' they have killed or would like to kill; a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed."

This is how I see how we got to this place where so many people have been deceived. They didn't anchor themselves to the Truth of the Word of God, and they opened themselves to the cultural brine of Kirk and Madsen's plan to overhaul straight America.

And it worked.

I will close with three personal observations about this situation:

Christians have bought into the culture's worship of feelings over God's unchanging revelation
People love how being a protector of the underdog makes them feel
Not enough of us Christ-followers are living lives that demonstrate the beauty and satisfaction of abiding in Christ
To my sweet friend who asked the question, let me say: God's good gift of sex and the intimacy of the marriage relationship is still intended ONLY for one man and one woman for life. In the beginning, one (Adam) became two (when God formed Eve from Adam), and then the two became one again. That is a deep mystery that makes all variations and deviations on God's intention wrong.

I am indebted to Hope Harris for her insight and analysis of this question.

Me114 #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

The True Identity of the American Negro

Negroes were already here in America before the Europeans came. If you are a so-called black American then most likely your ancestors were Americans not Africans brought over on slave ships. Please see the definition of American in the 1828 Webster’s dictionary.

AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.

You can see the usurpation of who an American is, right from that old definition. Just look at the average so-called African-American and you can see that they look nothing like Africans. American Negroes have lighter skin and different facial features. Their noses and lips are not as large as those of Africans.

I do not agree with the Hebrew Israelite movement but their reference points are valid. American negroes fit the description of those who are cursed by God in the book of Deuteronomy Chapter 28. Today’s so-called Bews have not been subject to the huge list of curses. The anecdotal evidence of Moses pulling out his leprous hand and it being white and then turned back to normal (black), points toward the Israelites being dark-skinned people. The apostle Paul also, being black, was questioned by a Roman guard as to how he could speak Greek.

The major problems with the Hebrew Israelite movement are many. One major problem is that most of them promote race hatred toward white people. They typically do not espouse Christian principles. The other problem is that they assume that the Israelites were in the Middle East and migrated to Africa and so they believe that their ancestors came to America on slave ships. They also include other peoples in Central America in their lists of Hebrew Israelites.

They miss the fact that Hebrew Israelites were already here in America all along. Now the question should be where did they come from?

I am working with a theory that the history and geography as written and passed down to us are very likely a deception. It is very possible that the events in the life of the nation of Israel happened here in North America and not in the Middle East at all. The names of places have been changed in antiquity. Monuments have been moved to hide the deception. If my theory is correct, then the land of Israel is located in the United States, a land flowing in milk and honey.

What if I am proven to be correct? What would this truth mean? For one, this revelation would mean that the American Negro is descendent from the tribes of Israel. All the promises to Abraham will come to these negroes. They are the olive tree that the gentiles are grafted into by Christ. They will eventually wake up to who they are. When they wake up then they will not be hating white people either. They will be God lovers as they will reunite with Jehovah.
The truth also means that Jerusalem is located somewhere in the United States. You can be sure that God knows where the city is.

There is a clue in scripture that the Israelites “forget” who they are. Let us look in the beginning of the book of Isaiah.

Isa 1:2 Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth: for the LORD hath spoken, I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against me.
Isa 1:3 The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master's crib: but Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider.
Isa 1:4 Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the LORD, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward.

Here we see plainly that Israelites have rebelled and also do not know that they are God’s people.

Isa 1:5 Why should ye be stricken any more? …

Why should God put anymore curses on the Israelites? They are too long to list for this essay but please read them all starting in Deuteronomy Chapter 28 verse 15:

Curses for Disobedience
Deu 28:15 But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to observe to do all his commandments and his statutes which I command thee this day; that all these curses shall come upon thee, and overtake thee:

The curses list ends with verse 68 and you will see that they only happened to American Negroes and definitely not to the people who call themselves Bews today.

Isa 1:5 Why should ye be stricken any more? ye will revolt more and more: the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint.
Isa 1:6 From the sole of the foot even unto the head there is no soundness in it; but wounds, and bruises, and putrifying sores: they have not been closed, neither bound up, neither mollified with ointment.
Isa 1:7 Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire: your land, strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown by strangers.

Returning to Isaiah the Prophet we see that their land is overrun by strangers, just like here in America when the Europeans came and their descendants are now called Americans.

Isa 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
Isa 1:19 If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land:

Isa 1:25 And I will turn my hand upon thee, and purely purge away thy dross, and take away all thy tin:
Isa 1:26 And I will restore thy judges as at the first, and thy counsellers as at the beginning: afterward thou shalt be called, The city of righteousness, the faithful city.
Isa 1:27 Zion shall be redeemed with judgment, and her converts with righteousness.

God wants to reason with the Israelites and restore them via judgment. And where is Zion? It would have to be here in America. Here are a few more verses in Isaiah. If you read through Isaiah with my theory in mind, I believe you will see that I may be correct that the true identity of the American Negro is that he is an Israelite.

Isa 3:12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
Isa 3:13 The LORD standeth up to plead, and standeth to judge the people.
Isa 3:14 The LORD will enter into judgment with the ancients of his people, and the princes thereof: for ye have eaten up the vineyard; the spoil of the poor is in your houses.
Isa 3:15 What mean ye that ye beat my people to pieces, and grind the faces of the poor? saith the LORD GOD of hosts.

Notice the single parent family (mother) and other children are raising the people? See the people are on welfare and poor?

So how will American Negroes find out who they are? They will be told their identity by the Two Witnesses in Revelation Chapter 11. Elijah the prophet will come and shock them and the whole world with much truth. I am working on an essay about the two witnesses and part one will be all about Elijah the Prophet. When he comes he will represent God to the world. He will speak God’s words and wake up everyone to many truths. He comes to restore all things as Jesus promised of him. In the end, all Israel will be saved and their sins blotted out. They will be grafted back into the Olive tree.

Ken Ham #fundie answersingenesis.org

Arkophobia

We’ve all heard of the word arachnophobia, a fear of spiders and other arachnids such as scorpions. Well, there is a new phobia showing up on countless blogs, on Twitter, and in news sources. And it has a similar-sounding name: Arkophobia. It’s a fear of the life-size Ark we are building in Williamstown, Kentucky, that opens July 7.

The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines a phobia as “an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation.”

Well, the Arkophobia we see all around us is certainly “illogical.” But it’s actually not “inexplicable.” Let me explain.

Arkophobia hit an all-time high the week of January 25. That’s when a federal judge issued a major ruling that gave a huge win to Answers in Genesis in our religious freedom lawsuit against the State of Kentucky and the actions of the previous governor, Steve Beshear.

The judge ruled that Kentucky could not deny the Ark project participation in the state’s tourism tax incentive program. Such a denial would be discriminatory based on the US Constitution and its First Amendment. The judge also ruled in accord with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title VII of that act, confirming that, as a religious organization, AiG can use religious preferences in Ark hiring.

image

Creation Wise: Ark Danger

Well, that federal decision was too much for the secularist/atheist bloggers. That’s when Arkophobia was at its height. Many secularists were already livid that a Christian organization is building such a massive tourist facility that will have a huge impact in the culture as it proclaims a Christian message! They just can’t stand it! Their hatred against Christianity was so clear after the ruling.

In bemoaning the judge’s decision, one atheist blogger mocked:

"In case you don’t know, Ken Ham is building a big boat in Kentucky and planning to tell people it’s a replica of Noah’s Ark. This, he believes, will make people want to become Christians and stop being gay. Ham’s God really likes spending millions of dollars on vanity woodwork projects but really hates people who love other people of the same gender.

Ham’s God is apparently ambivalent about giving some of those millions of dollars to those who most need it."

These hateful statements really help to reveal Arkophobia. What is the real reason for such vehement opposition to a project that will be so beneficial to the state as it brings hundreds of millions of tourist dollars into Kentucky for hotels, restaurants, and much more, and creates thousands of jobs? It’s because of the message of the Ark.

WHAT IS THE REAL REASON FOR SUCH VEHEMENT OPPOSITION TO THE ARK?
The opposition to the tax incentives, which are offered to any tourism project that will have a positive economic impact in Kentucky and create jobs (called a “neutral purpose”), is illogical. Furthermore, such censorship violates the US Constitution’s guarantee of the freedom of religion and its free exercise. The opposition we have been encountering is due to a heart issue.

Romans 3:23 teaches us that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” And Romans 3:10–18 states:

There is none righteous, no, not one; there is none who understands; there is none who seeks after God. They have all turned aside; they have together become unprofitable; there is none who does good, no, not one. Their throat is an open tomb; with their tongues they have practiced deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips; whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness. Their feet are swift to shed blood; destruction and misery are in their ways; and the way of peace they have not known. There is no fear of God before their eyes.

Victory in the Courts
In a major ruling, the federal judge confirmed that the 1964 Civil Rights Act allows AiG to use a religious preference in hiring.

The bottom line with the secularist opposition? Arkophobia is so widespread because “the heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; who can know it?” (Jeremiah 17:9). Secularists are in rebellion against their Creator. The fact that He has the right to tell them, through His Word, what is right (e.g., marriage is one man for one woman) and what is wrong (e.g., abortion is murder) angers them.

Secularists oppose the Ark because they are afraid of the Ark’s goal: to proclaim the everlasting gospel. Revelation 14:6–7 declares:

Then I saw another angel flying in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach to those who dwell on the earth—to every nation, tribe, tongue, and people—saying with a loud voice, “Fear God and give glory to Him, for the hour of His judgment has come; and worship Him who made heaven and earth, the sea and springs of water.”

Find out more about the Ark Encounter outreach at ArkEncounter.com.

Jonathan Van Maren #fundie lifesitenews.com

In the wake of claims that so-called “fake news” helped turn voters against Hillary Clinton and toward Donald Trump in the last election, the term itself has become so overused that it is nearly meaningless. Trump uses the “fake news” label to deride the mainstream media and highlight their liberal bias, while the Democrats insist that “fake news” tricked many ordinary people into voting against their own interests. Since then, there has been much discussion concerning how to limit “fake news” — Canadian, German, and American politicians have all cited “fake news” as a concern that needs to be addressed.

As a pro-life activist, these sorts of discussions make me nervous. Not because I don’t think that any “fake news” exists — I see plenty of social media posts from obviously fake websites peddling obviously fictitious stories. What concerns me is the fact that I don’t trust government authorities or the mainstream media or the academic establishment to determine what is and is not “fake news.” Inevitably, this sort of thing will end up resulting in the censorship of views that progressives dislike.

Consider the current conversation on abortion, for example. How often are media sources actually willing to discuss what abortion is? Pro-lifers are portrayed as wild-eyed religious fanatics or fundamentalist throwbacks trying to control female sexuality, while abortion supporters are portrayed as liberty-loving reproductive rights warriors. But imagine if a newspaper simply printed photographs of the human being in the womb at each stage of development, from conception until birth, and asked questions about when it was ethical to end that life? Or imagine if journalists confronted politicians with the fact that abortion often involves doctors tearing the limbs from the bodies of pre-born children, and asked if this was a humane response to a crisis pregnancy?

This, of course, would never happen. Media discussions of abortion exclude any details of the procedure we’re actually talking about. When the Planned Parenthood videos were released, for example, the media immediately accused David Daleiden and his investigators of “deceptively editing” the footage. Let’s say, for the sake of the argument, that the media’s accusation had been correct. What about all those discussions about “crushing” the fetus? What about those abortionist panels that had audiences in stitches over stray eyeballs plopping into the doctor’s lap? What about the abortionist casually chatting about how she had to “pull off a leg or two” during abortions? Nobody was claiming that those videos were “deceptively edited,” because they obviously were not. So why did those — and many other — horrific revelations not make the news?

The reason is simple. The abortion industry has progressive politicians, the mainstream media, and much of academia running cover for their barbarism. The media assists them in the coverup of what actually takes place within the abortion industry, which is why bombshell videos of abused animals get nonstop coverage but casual discussions about crushing tiny human beings gets dismissed and the whistleblowers maligned and slandered. That’s also why it took a concentrated social media shaming campaign to get even the slightest bit of news coverage for the Kermit Gosnell trial, where America’s most prolific serial killer was being charged with murder. Some journalists openly admitted that they didn’t want to cover the trial because it made the abortion industry look bad.

If we want to see what abortion activists intend to do to free speech, all we have to do is look at Europe. Two Members of European Parliament have begun the process of attempting to criminalize pro-life views and assert that opposition to abortion is “a form of violence.” The French Broadcasting Council and the French State Council actually banned a beautiful video called “Dear Future Mom,” because it showcased happy, smiling children with Down syndrome telling parents not to worry, and that they loved their parents like any other child would. It was decided, however, that this video would make the thousands of mothers who decided to abort their child with Down syndrome feel bad, and thus it should be censored. Those who are willing to violently end the lives of pre-born children will think nothing of censoring the truth and restricting freedom of speech.

“Fake news” may be a problem, but it is a problem borne out of our divided society, where nobody can agree on what the truth is anymore — if “truth” even exists. When government bodies and academic institutions begin to discuss how to address “fake news,” you can be sure that they do not simply mean fabricated stories with no basis in fact. They also mean the truth about abortion, and a wealth of information that they find inconvenient to furthering their so-called progressive causes. Our media and our politicians assist in the coverup of some of humanity’s greatest crimes, inflicted on our own offspring. They are not committed to truth, and we must be very wary when they begin to pretend as if they are.

Ross Olson #fundie creation.com

When I discuss the creation/evolution controversy, there are all sorts of interesting responses to the evidence. People are basically unable to answer the powerful logical and scientific case for creation. So, many eventually say something like this:

‘But if creation is true, why don’t all scientists believe it? All scientists agree that evolution is true.’ Others do not say this outright, but it is an unspoken criticism which they see as an automatic veto of anything that seems scientifically unorthodox.

Can the majority be wrong? Most people admit that the general public may be in error. But they doubt that the majority of scientists could be wrong. This implies that science is somehow different from other human enterprises, and that scientists are immune to the foibles of non-scientists.

History shows that the scientific establishment has been wrong time after time. It is unwise to bet your life on any scientific theory, no matter how popular it is. In fact, often those who have consciously sought safety by staying in the middle of the herd have ended up, like lemmings, in the middle of a stampede off an intellectual cliff.

Hungarian physician Ignaz Semmelweis (1818–1865) found that by washing his hands between the time he examined dead bodies and the time he delivered babies, he could prevent certain illnesses in mothers and babies, and save many lives. He was appalled by the heavy death rate in Vienna maternity hospital when he worked there. He introduced antiseptics, and the death rate plummeted from 12 per cent to 1.5 per cent.

Even though Semmelweis should have been declared a hero for this simple but powerful discovery, he was not. He was not even asked for his data. Rather, his idea was soundly rejected by his colleagues, and he was forced to return to his home in Budapest. Germs had not yet been discovered, and the physicians of that day had no theoretical basis for understanding the phenomenon Semmelweis was talking about. Even so, the idea would have been easy to test and was clearly of great potential importance. But they did not even consider it.

If we had quizzed the ‘dirty hands’ doctors at a particularly frank and honest moment, they may have said: ‘It just doesn’t make sense. If I can’t see it, it must not be real.’ Or, ‘What I don’t know can’t hurt me (or my patients).’ Or worse yet, they might have said, ‘If I admit to this, I will have to accept responsibility for untold past preventable suffering.’

Our past decisions may prejudice our ability to evaluate the present. A scientist who has based his career on calculating what happened during the first few moments of the ‘big bang’ will find it difficult to be open to evidence that the ‘big bang’ never happened. Great learning does not always make a person more honest and accessible, but it may increase the complexity of his or her rationalizations.

A young graduate student who believes in creation, but also knows that rejection of evolution would jeopardize his degree and career, may try to work out some intellectual compromise, whether it fits the data or not. (This is essentially a form of protective colouration which makes his beliefs invisible in that environment.) He is then likely to spend the rest of his professional life ‘agreeing with himself’. He may even ridicule those more forthright than he, partly because they prick his conscience.

Many scientists hold firmly to evolution despite the evidence. They know that without evolution they must consider themselves responsible to a creator. Their need to reject that possibility is so emotionally powerful that they hang on to evolution tenaciously.

Most of us assume the best about our fellow humans unless forced to think otherwise. Have you ever read a newspaper account of an event you know by personal experience, and found the story inaccurate or incomplete? You then probably wondered about the accuracy of other stories in the paper. Even though the scientific method is supposed to encourage objectivity, some data get recorded and some get ignored, some articles get published and some get rejected—a lot depends on the very human motives of individual people. Even looking at the same data and the same articles, different observers can come to different conclusions.

Great breakthroughs in science are not achieved only by the brilliant. They are shared by the honest and courageous who study the emperor’s new clothes and regard truth as more important than political correctness or a grant for further study. This does not mean that someone outside the herd is automatically right. But proper conclusions may be opposed by scholars with ulterior motives.

At one time or another, most children probably say to their parents (in support of some questionable activity), ‘But everybody’s doing it!’ Good Christian parents invariably say, ‘No, they’re not! But even if they were, you’re not, because it’s against what God wants for you, so it’s wrong.’ We should therefore become a bit wary if someone says, ‘But everybody knows…’, or ‘All scientists agree…’. They probably don’t. And even if they did, it might still be wrong.

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

On October 28, 2017, someone calling themselves "Q" began posting a series of cryptic messages on a web forum called “4chan” in a sub-category under politics (pol) titled “Calm Before the Storm” (in reference to that mysterious Trump quote from early October). Q, aka Q-Anon, claimed to be a high-level government insider with special "Q clearance" (hence the name) tasked with posting “crumbs” for the purpose of covertly informing patriots about Donald Trump’s master plan to rout the Deep State and the whole Globalist-Rothschild structure above them.

Though Sugar the Crazed Conspiracy Cat was on board the Q-train a few weeks ago, your cautious reporter here remained skeptical, yet open-minded. As a result of too many of Q's advance clues coming to pass, we are now in agreement that Q is indeed for real – though the jury is still out as to whether Q and the great crusade truly represents the “White Hat” faction of America’s military, intelligence and law enforcement communities, or if Q, and Trump, are just tools of the anti-Globalist Zionists.

Q's mysterious posts can no longer be dismissed as an Internet hoax. This individual has special knowledge and even some in the Globalist media are getting worried.

According to Q, and as confirmed by recent events, Trump was never really under investigation by Robert Mueller. To the contrary, Q’s advance clues, coupled with subsequent events, have been showing us that it is actually scum such as Killary Clinton, McCain the Insane, Homo- Obongo, George Soros and the Rothschild Crime Dynasty who need to be worried.

The Q phenomenon has since made its way out of the darkest corners of the Internet and attracted the keen interest of the attention-whore Alex Jones (who assures us that although Q is great, his sources are even better.) and syndicated radio host “Lionel” (Michael William Lebron). Q’s prophetic posts have also caught the scornful attention of New York Magazine (that’s a really good sign!).

Although we encourage our readers to remain cautious of Q’s ultimate intentions, “youse guys” (New Jerseyese for the plural of “you”) ought to have a look at some of the various analysis of his cryptic posts. Eerie as all heck! We list below just three of the many "crumbs" that made us go: “Hmmmmmm.”

November 13, 2017: Q Threatens Lynn de Rothschild -- Followed by Deadly Plane Crash at Rothschild Estate

"Lady" Lynn de Rothschild is the American wife of "Sir" Evelyn de Rothschild. She is a rabid supporter of Killary Clinton and fanatically obsessed with tweeting out her pure Satanic hatred against Donald Trump. Q tweeted a cryptic threat aimed at her family, using the letters "L," "d," and "R" (notice how the letter cases match the initials of Lynn de Rothschild).

Just four days after Q's clue, this headline:

Telegraph: Aylesbury mid-air crash: Four dead as plane and helicopter wreckage lands near Rothschild manor house (here)

December 11, 2017: Q Threatens George Soros -- Soros disappears?

The initials GS can mean no other than George Soros. Just two weeks after Q threatened to put Soros in "a special place," the evil financier's twitter went silent. After tweeting 4-5 times per week throughout all of 2017, there have been zero tweets from his account since November 26th. (here) Prior to that, his longest twitter dry spell for 2017 had been only 10 days. Where the heck is George Soros? A "special place" in Guantanamo?

As of the date of this TomatoBubble article, December 27, there have been no tweets from "GS" (an avid twitterer!) for 32 days, and counting.

Before the votes had been counted in Alabama's Senate race, Q posted, with absolute certainty, of a Democrat victory based on voter fraud and Soros-owned machines. He indicated that the subsequent investigation would expose the Democrat Party. Lo and behold, much to everyone's surprise, Democrat Doug Jones did defeat Republican Roy Moore, and an investigation is indeed progressing!

Was it a "sting" operation?

The Communist Doug Jones won, but the Alabama Senate election is now under investigation -- exactly as Q had told us in his post.

Could it really be that Globalist gangsters are being investigated, arrested and even killed? If so, are the military & law enforcement "White Hats" coming to our rescue, or is this just part of a factional war Zionist vs Globalist war amongst competing gangsters? Are Trump's repeated two-hand drinking episodes that have so amused the late night commie-comics a signal that people are being placed in handcuffs and sent to prison?

Who can say for sure at this point. But what we will say with certainty is that something very big is taking shape -- and Q, regardless of his ultimate intentions, should not be ignored.

Trump, who is notoriously etiquette-conscious, has mimicked the manner in which a man wearing handcuffs would drink water. Each time, the Piranha Press has mocked him for it, yet he keeps doing it --- most recently while wearing a purple tie which symbolizes Soros "color revolutions."

Killary and McCain have both been wearing ankle boots for past two months, he for a "tendon injury" and she for a "broken toe." Are they concealing GPS ankle devices? (Your cane is on the wrong side,Senator.) McCain was later caught switching his boot from right to left, and explained it away by saying his other leg was getting sore!!!

Phyllis Chesler #fundie meforum.org

<table>

It's become fashionable to draw comparisons between the popular television adaptation of Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and Donald Trump's America.

It's become fashionable to draw comparisons between the popular television adaptation of Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and Donald Trump's America.

Margaret Atwood, whose work I have long admired, is now being hailed as a prophet. It is quite the phenomenon. According to the pundits, Atwood's 1985 work, The Handmaid's Tale, which Mary McCarthy once savaged, and the recently-published 2019 sequel, The Testaments, are dystopias which aptly describe the contemporary climate change crisis, toxic environments, the rise in infertility, and the enslavement of women in Trump's America.

Is this all Atwood is writing about? Do the increasing restrictions on abortion in America parallel the extreme misogyny of Gilead, the theocratic state in Atwood's saga? Is the unjust separation of mothers and children, a la Trump on the southern border, what Atwood has foretold? Every review and interview with Atwood that I could find strongly insists that this is the case.

Michelle Goldberg, in the New York Times, attributes the current popularity of The Handmaid's Tale to Trump's ascendancy. She writes: "It's hardly surprising that in 2016 the book resonated—particularly women—stunned that a brazen misogynist, given to fascist rhetoric and backed by religious fundamentalists was taking power."

<table>

Gilead-inspired handmaid outfits have become popular at anti-Trump rallies as far away as Poland.

Gilead-inspired handmaid outfits have become popular at anti-Trump rallies as far away as Poland.

... At the anti-Trump pro-women's rights marches around the country, some feminist protesters dressed like Handmaids in billowing, shapeless red dresses, their facial identities obscured by large, white Victorian-era bonnets, carrying signs that read: "Make Margaret Atwood fiction again" and "The Handmaid's Tale is not an instruction manual."

They have a point. Abortion rights are being steadily challenged and nearly eviscerated in the formerly slave-owning American states. Right-to-life lawyers insist that the protection of unborn children without any gestational markers is the law of the land. We now have free states and slave states in terms of access to high quality, insurance-funded abortions. Pregnant, drug-addicted women are being jailed for child abuse.

<table>

Gilead most reflects what is happening not in America, but in most Islamic countries.

Gilead most reflects what is happening not in America, but in most Islamic countries.

However ... [t]here's another contemporary parallel that also gets scant attention. Gilead's system of pseudo-theocratic totalitarian control in both her novels and in the MGM/Hulu versions does not accurately reflect what is happening in America today; it mirrors what is happening in most Islamic countries, a fact that Atwood and her admirers are too politically correct to notice.

Obscuring one's individual identity, masking one's face, sequestering women at home, may have been true of many previous cultures and regimes. However, in this day forced niqabs (face veils) and burqas (head, face, and body bags) are mainly realities for women in Muslim countries and communities in the West. In Iran in July, three women were sentenced to a total of 55 years between them for protesting against the veil.

<table>

In July 2019, an Iranian court sentenced Yasaman Aryani (left), Monireh Arabshahi (center), and Mojgan Keshavarz to a total of 55 years in prison for protesting against the veil.

In July 2019, an Iranian court sentenced Yasaman Aryani (left), Monireh Arabshahi (center), and Mojgan Keshavarz to a total of 55 years in prison for protesting against the veil.

In The Handmaid's Tale Atwood does mention Islam twice (to exonerate Muslims as the suspected mass murderers of Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Oval Office in Gilead (p.174) and again in a reference to the "obsession with harems" on the part of allegedly Orientalist Western painters who did not understand that they were painting "boredom" (p.69). Atwood's quintessential Bad Guys are Caucasian, Bible-thumping, right wing, conservative, American Christians.

Where else but in the Islamic world do we see forced face veiling, forced child marriage, women confined to the home, polygamy (a "wife" and a "handmaid" under the same roof), male guardians and minders, cattle prod shocking, whipping, hand amputations, stoning, crazed vigilante mobs stomping and tearing people apart, and tortured corpses publicly displayed on city walls or hanging from cranes in order to terrify the populace? Or the torture murder of homosexuals? This is how Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, the Islamic Republics of Iran and Afghanistan, the tyrants of Somalia and Saudi Arabia, interpret, correctly or incorrectly, Sharia law.

How could all the reviewers not see what I so clearly see? Perhaps here's how.

I once lived in a harem in Afghanistan—a harem simply means the "women's quarters." It is forbidden territory to all men who are not relatives. If you can't leave without permission or without a male escort, you are in a harem and living in purdah.

<table>

"I once lived in a harem ... the property of a polygamous Afghan family."

"I once lived in a harem ... the property of a polygamous Afghan family."

After a 30-month courtship, I married the glamorous, wealthy, very Westernized, foreign student whom I first met at college when I was 18. We never once discussed religion. Not a word about Islam. He had not prepared me for what life would be like in his country, even temporarily. For example, he had never even mentioned that his father had three wives and 21 children, that most Afghan women still wore burqas or heavy hijab, that I would be pressured to convert to Islam, and would have to live with my mother-in-law.

When we landed in Kabul, officials smoothly removed my American passport—which I never saw again. Suddenly, I was the citizen of no country and had no rights. I had become the property of a polygamous Afghan family. I was not allowed out without a male escort, a male driver, and a female relative as my chaperones.

This marriage had transported me back to the 10th Century and trapped me there without a passport back to the future.

I experienced what it was like to live with people who were permanently afraid of what other people might think—even more so than in Small Mind Town, USA.

<table>

Read more about the author's captivity in Afghanistan in her acclaimed 2013 book.

Read more about the author's captivity in Afghanistan in her acclaimed 2013 book.

I was terrified when I first saw women wearing ghostly burqas—ambulatory body bags, sensory deprivation isolation chambers—huddled together literally at the back of the bus. My Afghan family laughed at my over-reaction, which was considered abnormal, not their practice of burying women alive.

My dreamer-of-a husband kept assuring me that the dreadful burqa and my captivity would both soon pass. He lived to see this dream come true for about 15 years for the middle classes until it was shattered again, perhaps forever.

Many Afghan women have mothers-in-law who beat them and treat them as despised servants. Mine never hit me or ordered me to cook or clean, but she tried to convert me to Islam every single day and tried to kill me by telling the servants to stop boiling my water and washing my fruits and vegetables. I got deathly ill.

Poor woman, she was a deserted and much maligned first wife. She feared me, envied me, hated me—as a woman, an infidel, a Jew, an American, and mainly, as a "love match," something considered too dangerously Western. Afghan mothers-in-law do collaborate in or even perpetrate the honor/horror killings of their daughters and daughters-in-law. So do rural India-based Hindu mothers and mothers-in-law, Muslim mothers and mothers-in-law world-wide, and Sikhs, to a lesser extent.

I got out of the wild, wild East and I moved on. But I never forgot the way it was. I always understood that as imperfect as America and the West might be, it was still a much better place for women than the Islamic world. Forever after, I understood that barbaric customs are indigenous, not caused by foreign intervention; and that, like the West, Islam was also an imperial and colonial power, owned slaves, and engaged in gender and religious apartheid.

I owe Afghanistan a great deal for teaching me this. Perhaps my radical Western feminism was forged long ago in pampered purdah in Kabul.

Islamic or Islamist totalitarianism today and as I knew it nearly 60 years ago in Kabul is the more obvious face of Gilead than the one imagined by Atwood more than 30 years ago.

Like the handmaids and domestics in Gilead, the captive population in Orwell's 1984 is monitored around the clock through "telescreens" that can view every room, each person. The telescreens broadcast Big Brother's orders and conduct daily "hate" sessions. People are always anxious and paranoid; everyone has permanent enemies.

Today, Orwell's Thought Police sound a lot like the Afghan Taliban or like Iran's or Saudi Arabia's Virtue­ and-Vice squads, who arrest men and women for the smallest sign of "individuality" or difference, and who harass and arrest women for showing a single strand of hair, or a glimpse of ankle. Here's Khaled Hosseini's fictional description of life in Afghanistan under the Soviets in The Kite Runner:

You couldn't trust anyone in Kabul anymore—for a fee or under threat, people told on each other, neighbor on neighbor, child on parent, brother on brother, servant on master, friend on friend...the rafiqs, the [Afghan] comrades, were everywhere and they'd split Kabul into two groups: those who eavesdropped and those who didn't...A casual remark to the tailor while getting fitted for a suit might land you in the dungeons of Poleh-charkhi...Even at the dinner table, in the privacy of their own home, people had to speak in a calculated manner—the rafiqs were in the classrooms too; they'd taught children to spy on their parents, what to listen for, whom to tell.

And here he is describing Afghanistan in the Taliban era:

In Kabul, fear is everywhere, in the streets, in the stadiums, in the markets, it is a part of our lives here...the savages who rule our watan [country] don't care about human decency. The other day, I accompanied Farzanajan to the bazaar to buy some potatoes and naan. She asked the vendor how much the potatoes cost, but he did not hear her, I think he had a deaf ear. So she asked louder and suddenly a young Talib ran over and hit her on the thighs with his wooden stick. He struck her so hard she fell down. He was screaming at her and cursing and saying the Ministry of Vice and Virtue does not allow women to speak loudly. She had a large purple bruise on her leg for days...If I fought, that dog would have surely put a bullet in me, and gladly!

Hosseini's descriptions are right out of 1984 or The Handmaid's Tale.

Two memoirs set in Iran, Azar Nafisi's best-selling Reading Lolita in Tehran and Roya Hakakian's Journey from the Land of No, describe the savage curtailment of private life and thought—and of life itself—by radical Islamists.

<table>

Two compelling accounts of life for women in Iran's Islamic Republic.

Two compelling accounts of life for women in Iran's Islamic Republic.

According to Nafisi, Khomeini's goon squads closed news­papers and universities and arrested, tortured, and executed beloved teachers, prominent artists, intellectuals, and activists, including feminists, and thousands of other innocent and productive Muslims. The squads constantly harassed women on the street and at work. If a woman failed the dress-code standards even slightly, or by accident, she risked being arrested, probably raped, probably executed.

In Journey from the Land of No, Roya Hakakian describes the in­describable "Mrs. Moghadam," the newly-installed head of the Jewish girls' high school. Mrs. Moghadam tyrannizes, terrifies, and shames the Jewish girls. She tries to convert them to Islam. However, her true passion is more Talibanesque. She informs the innocent girls that, although they do not know it, they are "diabolical," "abominable," "loathsome," "lethal," capable of "drowning everything in eternal dark­ness," capable of bringing the "apocalypse" by showing a single strand of hair. To Hakakian's credit, she presents a rather dangerous turn of events as a dark comedy.

Mrs. Moghadam is definitely an Aunt Lydia, the lead female tormentor of the Handmaids, right out of Gilead, circa 1985.

<table>

Many Western feminists mistakenly see the face veil and head scarf as symbols of anti-racism.

Many Western feminists mistakenly see the face veil and head scarf as symbols of anti-racism.

As Muslim women are being tortured, honor-murdered by their families, or stoned to death, sometimes for refusing to wear the veil, many Western multiculturally and politically correct post-colonial feminists are deconstructing and wearing the face veil and the head scarf as symbols of anti-racism and as a form of respect when they visit Muslim countries. Such feminists are also silencing and demonizing all other views in academic journals, in the media, and on feminist internet groups.

I've written about this many times. Therefore, while I know that violence against women still remains a burning issue in the West, I agree with Allison Pearson's recent article in The Spectator: "The appalling vanity of Western Feminists who think Margaret Atwood writes about them."

Atwood depicts an all-female power structure in which the handmaids are kept in line by cruel female "Aunts," led by Aunt Lydia, who casually apply cattle prods and tasers, who blame them as evil sluts, punish them with group condemnation, bouts of solitary confinement, exile them to the "Colonies" to die cleaning up toxic waste, etc. Such behavior seems to contradict feminist views of women as morally superior to men and as more compassionate and intuitive.

<table>

Aunt Lydia (left) and the al-Khansa Brigade of ISIS

Aunt Lydia (left) and the al-Khansa Brigade of ISIS

Like men, women are human beings and as such are as close to the apes as to the angels. Women are also aggressive, cruel, competitive, envious, sometimes lethally so, but mainly toward other women. I would not want to be at the mercy of a female prison guard—or a female concentration camp guard—in the West. But let's not forget the Wives of ISIS—the all-femaleal-Khansaa Brigade who whipped, beat, and mutilated the breasts of girls and women when their heavy black burqas slipped. Displaced ISIS women continue their anti-woman reign of terror.

Misogynist thinking and actions exist in America today but not only among right-wing conservatives. It is also flourishing among our media and academic elites. Such thinking is flying high under the banner of "free speech," "multi-cultural relativism," "anti-racism," and "political correctness." Dare to question this elite's right to silence and shame those who challenge their views—i.e., that the West is always to blame, that jihadists are freedom-fighters, that the Islamic face veil is a free choice or a religious commandment, that polygamy encourages sisterhood, that Islam is a race, not a religious and political ideology—and, as I've noted many times, one is attacked as a racist, an Islamophobe, and a conservative, and swiftly demonized and de-platformed.

While MGM/Hulu's TV series is dramatically compelling, part soap opera, part horror movie, part Warrior Queen fantasy, the series is radically different from Atwood's 1985 novel. For example, Atwood's narrator, Ofglen, is not an increasingly daring, crazed, female assassin, as Elizabeth Moss brilliantly plays her. She is hardly heroic at all; under totalitarianism, heroism, collective or individual, is quickly ferreted out and destroyed. It exists but is rare.

Contemporary viewers are hungry for multi-racial characters, interracial and same-sex couples, "badass" women. Hulu gives them to us. Hulu's Canada is a multi-racial, politically correct refuge for Gilead's escapees; same-sex couples and feminists are government leaders. This is not true in the novel. On the contrary, in her 1985 Epilogue, Atwood has Canada rounding up and returning all Gilead escapees.

<table>

Media and academic elites are playing partisan politics with Atwood's original vision.

Media and academic elites are playing partisan politics with Atwood's original vision.

Atwood the divine novelist is absolutely entitled to depict whatever she wishes. But the current crop of reviewers as well as the filmmakers are playing partisan politics with her original vision and are refusing to see other and larger global dangers contained in her work.

Women's freedom and women's lives worldwide are under the most profound siege. To focus solely on the United States or on the Caucasian, Judeo-Christian West is diversionary. It scapegoats one country, one culture, for the far greater crimes of other countries and cultures.

Phyllis Chesler, a Shillman-Ginsburg Fellow at the Middle East Forum, is an emerita professor of psychology and women's studies and the author of eighteen books, including Women and Madness, Woman's Inhumanity to Woman, An American Bride in Kabul, and A Politically Incorrect Feminist.

Notes:

[1]Commercial surrogacy has been outlawed in India, Thailand, parts of Mexico, Malaysia, and South Africa, as well as in many European countries including Austria, Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, and the UK. Hence, the campaign to legalize commercial surrogacy in America has gathered momentum.

[2] Contemporary surrogacy has now become a way of slicing and dicing biological motherhood into three parts: an egg donor, who undergoes painful and dangerous IVF procedures; a "gestational" mother who faces all the risks of pregnancy, childbirth, and potentially negative and lifelong medical and psychiatric consequences; and an adoptive mother or father. This vivisection of motherhood makes it impossible for a birthmother to win custody for any reason.

Afadly - fanatic muslim, sexist / racist / child lover #fundie whywontgodhealamputees.com

Post #1

So you agree with me, you accepted statistics about 13 yrs old, but say it is not enough

What is the difference between 13 and 9 or 11? we can go to expert medical opinions
When girls get month periods
At what age does a girl get her first period?

So what is the difference? it is percentages only
Lets say that at 15 yrs 95% of girls have month periods
at 13 it is 80%
at 11 it is 50%
at 10 it is 30%
at 9 it is 10%
at 8 (Yes only eight years old) 2%


Most of these people wand and desire sex, so the fact that some 9 years girls will need sex, what can she do?

Also note that in some of these links they said, sexual maturity or a girl will become an adult, ADULT
Calling her a child is false
In many legal cases in USA they use the term "Treated as an adult", wow they break their own rules

Post #2

If statistics (They are not done by me) show that many US girls do sex before 13, what does that mean?
Does this mean that they do it at exactly the age of 13

Anyway it is not my or your opinion it is pure medical fact, girls starting from age 8 (or even maybe 7 or 6 sometimes, I don't know) will need and do sex
(See how many young whore who got pregnant in US now)

The Question is, What is the best regulation for them?
Does this regulation should depend on Age? and what will be that Age?

I know (as you like all Atheists here, not honest ) will evade questions and write any non-sense
But the point is proved 100%

cr500af #racist niggermania.net

Was riding at the motocross track with my brother on Saturday. He had a serious accident--not life threatening, but he badly broke a wrist and broke several bones in his face (yes he was wearing a good quality helmet). I took him to our local emergency room where service was quick and professional. But the local hospital referred us to The Med, also known as the Elvis Presley Trauma Center in Memphis due to his facial fractures. Brother got to ride the ambulance, and I followed with my wife in my own vehicle.

We got to EPTC at midnight and had to park in a parking garage 2 blocks away. I already knew the facility didn't allow guns or knives and had a metal detector at the entrance, so I reluctantly disarmed myself at my car. As soon as I opened the door, I heard 5 quick rounds of gunfire in the street--but I couldn't locate the direction due to being inside a concrete parking garage. We crossed our fingers and walked to the hospital entrance.

Inside, I was greeted with the biggest bongo party I've ever had the displeasure of seeing. Wall to wall niggers of every variety. Gang bangers, prostitutes, niggerpotomusses, snake heads, afro heads, weave heads... All the security and staff in the emergency room were niggers. Apparently, the "trauma center" also serves as a general purpose inner city emergency room, and we were there at midnight on Saturday night in the middle of Memphis. Four human beings (my wife, my mother, brother's other daughter and myself) were forced to sit in this hell-hole waiting room till after 3:00 am surrounded by shenanigans and nigger shines. Here are a few highlights.

1) A simian street bum kept getting past security into the waiting room, where it would wander around begging. I couldn't understand it's attempts at speech, but at one point it probably identified me as one of the few "haves" in a room full of "have nots", and started trying to get me to give it something--a cigarette I think (I'm not a smoker). I looked at it and in my most intimidating expression and voice loudly said "NO!" The nigger shrugged its shoulders like it was saying "dat be sum booshit". My mother asked "what was he wanting?" I told her I didn't know and didn't care, the answer was always going to be no. Security then came and escorted the animal outside. But it came back inside the waiting room at least twice more during the night. Great job security team.

2) We learned that brother had been put in the trauma unit, and we normally would have relocated to another trauma unit family waiting room deeper inside the building that would have been quieter. But the hospital had been put on lockdown due to the shooting that occurred in the street literally outside the door (which was the gunfire I heard when I exited my vehicle). We were therefore trapped inside the waiting room from hell, where apparently half of the occupants were related to the apes who were shooting at each other outside in the street. We could have left and waited outside, but of course that was no option.

3) At about 3:00 am, a pitiful nigger street creature staggered into the waiting room and sat down on the bench immediately next to us. I won't be able to adequately describe it. The nigger looked older, was bone thin and walked like it had a version of cerebral palsy. Clothes looked like it had been wallowing in a dusty hole. After nigger sat down, it pulled off its baseball cap and spent the next 20 minutes picking insects out of its head fur. It would bend over and scratch its head and watch the insects hit the ground. Then it pulled off its shoes... My wife caught herself from nearly vomiting. I've never seen anything like it. The nigger had toes that were facing backwards and every other direction. Some looked like they were fused together, and the toes were green and yellow. Then the creature started staggering around the waiting room on its bare hind paws. I observed that there were other nigger animals sleeping on the floors this thing was walking on. And of course, there were now either lice or fleas on the bench where it has been sitting. Security told the creature several times to put its shoes back on, and finally succeeded in getting it to do so.

4) I've got to give the nigger staff credit--they did recognize the potential biohazard of the broken down street creature, so after they got rid of the thing, they sent a little old nigger woman house keeper to come mop the floor where green toes had been sitting. (But they never did wipe down the bench it was sitting on). My mother tried to be nice and talk to the house keeper, but I couldn't understand a thing it was saying in return. It smiled and appeared to be pleasantly interacting with my mother, but then as it turned to presumably go back to work, it whacked my mom in the head with the end of its mop handle!

5) A mated pair of subhumans were escorted out of the emergency room. The pregnant female had been examined by a doctor and began cursing and abusing him, so it was escorted out to the sidewalk. The male partner had been inside the bathroom for a long time, which was immediately behind our bench. A security guard startled us by beating on the bathroom door, which produced the inside occupant. It was told to leave the hospital, that its pregnant mate was already outside on the sidewalk.

At this the male started cursing and threatening the security guard. Multiple guards got involved at this point. The snake headed security guard who initiated the contact was a skinny little nigger that couldn't have weighed over 120 pounds. But when other security guards started physically dragging the cursing, threatening male outside, the little security guard was running behind yelling "I'm here--watchu gonna do? I'm here, come on show me watchus got!" Very professional. Many more observations from ghetto hell that night, but we finally were allowed to enter the interior of the hospital to where brother was sometime between 3 and 4:00 am.

JG Smoothy #fundie barbwire.com

Holy Savagery

One of the objections to Atheism is its inability to account for the morality of our conscience. If God doesn’t exist, why not steal, why not murder, why not rape and pillage. Some of the most dastardly deeds are done by seemingly conscienceless individuals. Their ends usually win them the best seat in the execution chamber: the ever-coveted high-voltage chair, or else an extended furlough in a ten-by-eight cell.

They have overridden the morality in their conscience and convinced themselves that God doesn’t exist, leaving them free to follow depravity’s path.

Unlike the community criminal, the Jihadist has a deified blessing to carry out evil against the non-Muslim. It’s an excuse for the Muslim to let their baser instincts (a result of man being born into sin) take over with a wink from Albert, (bless-his-name-forever-more) sorry, I mean Allah.

Society’s Split Brain Syndrome

On our end, we want freedom from God to lust, to abort, to steal, to cheat, to hallucinate, to trade natural affections for unnatural affections, to fill our minds with trash or to ignore the poor. We want God to go stand in the corner till we need Him to prosper, to grow, to protect or to heal.

“Come close God…ok now go away”.

The “Obamination Ad-menstruation” getting in for a second term is the result of our schizophrenic relationship with The Almighty. Like I have written before, we now have our modern day ‘Saul-ibaba’.

Two Enemies in the West

What we have seen in Paris is not unfathomable, but totally predictable. I mean you’d have to be in a coma to not have seen this coming. The western world has allowed two demonic enterprises to join forces and attack the spiritual backbone of what are now just cadavers of nations.

On one hand we have invited the most barbaric political ideology possible, Islam, to come find some nice fertile soil in our own backyards. Putting up with their Halal this, cover that; “We’re offended by this institution”; offended by that cross over there; “Take down that nativity for Allah’s sake!”

We ignore the fact that they are taking over entire towns and recruiting for Islamic guerilla camps within our own borders.
Bring this up at the next cocktail party you attend (total “elephant in the room” scenario).

On the other hand we have the disgruntled atheist who demands that not even the resting places of dead soldiers are sacred ground (and we joke in disgust about the Westboro Baptist cult!).

“Get rid of the nativity!”

“Remove those three most repugnant letters (G-o-d) from society.”

Really the only difference between the far-lefty and the Jihadist is that one of them will put bacon in their Caesar salad. In reality they both hate America and desire to reshape it into something we totally abhor.

You just can’t let subcultures have this kind of power.

It’s easy to be a terrorist in Europe.

wesleyangun #fundie charismanews.com

I hate to break this to you, but Muslims in America I knew were not unhappy with 9-11. One told me that America had it coming. Muslims rejoiced overseas. To paraphrase an old saying, a radical Muslim is one who wants to kill you. A moderate Muslim is one who is urging him on. Your historical myopia is unbelievable:

"Christians in the eleventh century were not paranoid fanatics. Muslims really were gunning for them. While Muslims can be peaceful, Islam was born in war and grew the same way. From the time of Mohammed, the means of Muslim expansion was always the sword. Muslim thought divides the world into two spheres, the Abode of Islam and the Abode of War. Christianity — and for that matter any other non-Muslim religion — has no abode. Christians and Jews can be tolerated within a Muslim state under Muslim rule. But, in traditional Islam, Christian and Jewish states must be destroyed and their lands conquered. When Mohammed was waging war against Mecca in the seventh century, Christianity was the dominant religion of power and wealth. As the faith of the Roman Empire, it spanned the entire Mediterranean, including the Middle East, where it was born. The Christian world, therefore, was a prime target for the earliest caliphs, and it would remain so for Muslim leaders for the next thousand years.

With enormous energy, the warriors of Islam struck out against the Christians shortly after Mohammed's death. They were extremely successful. Palestine, Syria, and Egypt — once the most heavily Christian areas in the world — quickly succumbed. By the eighth century, Muslim armies had conquered all of Christian North Africa and Spain. In the eleventh century, the Seljuk Turks conquered Asia Minor (modern Turkey), which had been Christian since the time of St. Paul. The old Roman Empire, known to modern historians as the Byzantine Empire, was reduced to little more than Greece. In desperation, the emperor in Constantinople sent word to the Christians of western Europe asking them to aid their brothers and sisters in the East.

That is what gave birth to the Crusades. They were not the brainchild of an ambitious pope or rapacious knights but a response to more than four centuries of conquests in which Muslims had already captured two-thirds of the old Christian world. At some point, Christianity as a faith and a culture had to defend itself or be subsumed by Islam. The Crusades were that defense."

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

If ancient Greece had copyrighted the name Zeus, or registered it as a trademark, that country would not be under financial assault by the Fourth Reich.

If ancient Greece had registered the name Zeus™ as a trademark, and licensed its use, Greece would be the richest country in the world right now.

Instead of Greece borrowing from the BIS (Bank for International Settlements) and the Bank of England, they would be the world's creditors.

Britannia should have a "special relationship" with Greece because they both worship Zeus or Esus.

In ancient times the main enemy of the freedom-loving Greeks was the mighty Persian Empire. Today, it is NATO or the British Fourth Reich.

The present Greek crisis began over a century ago when a granddaughter of Queen Victoria married Constantine, the Crown Prince of Greece.

The couple were married in Athens on October 27. 1889 was indeed a fateful year as that was the year of the birth of another of Victoria's grandsons named Adolf Hitler.

In 1858, Frederick, Crown Prince of Prussia, married femme fatale Victoria, eldest daughter of Queen Victoria.

In 1888, Frederick became Emperor Frederick III of united Germany or the Second Reich.

Frederick was a man of peace, and after reigning for only 99 days he died of "throat cancer" at the young age of 56.

The couple had 8 children: Wilhelm, Charlotte, Henry, Sigismund, Victoria, Waldemar, Sophie, Margaret. As well as completely domineering her husband, their mother made sure that all the children were extreme Anglophiles. All of Victoria's children were spies installed at almost every strategic European Court.

In 1881, Crown Prince Wilhelm married his second cousin, Augusta Victoria, of Schleswig-Holstein.

Wilhelm became Kaiser Wilhelm II in 1888 after the timely death of his father.

He was the notorious "Kaiser Bill" of World War I.

The longest reigning Greek monarch was King George I. Originally a Danish prince, George was born in Copenhagen. In 1867, he married a Russian princess, Olga Constantinovna, of the Romanov dynasty.

Two of his sisters, Alexandra and Dagmar, married into the British and Russian royal families. King Edward VII and Tsar Alexander III were his brothers-in-law and King George V and Tsar Nicholas II were his nephews.

In 1867, King George I of Greece married 16-year-old Olga Constantinovna of Russia.

The king was the longest reigning Greek monarch.

In 1896, under the king's sponsorship, the modern Olympic Games were born in Athens.

The king had 7 children by his loving Christian wife Olga. Their children could have continued the Romanov dynasty after the Tsar was titaniced but that never happened.

On May 6, 1913, the king was assassinated by a British Secret Service agent named Alexandros Schinas.

In 1889, Crown Prince Constantine of Greece married Sophia of Prussia–the daughter of Kaiser Frederick and Princess Victoria.

This was the same year that Adolf Hitler–another of Queen Victoria's grandsons–was born.

After the timely assassination of his father, Constantine became king.

Victoria's dynastic marriages had a very definite purpose: surround France with hostile countries, and keep Holy Russia out of the Mediterranean at all costs. The Greeks were allies of the Russians and the Terrible Turks were the main British allies in the Balkans.

[...]

Queen Elizabeth II is a great-granddaughter of Queen Victoria.

Her husband/helper, Prince Philip, is a great-grandson of Queen Victoria.

King Henry was appalled at the very idea of a female ruling England and his lack of a male heir was the genesis of the blessed Reformation in Britain.

In Britannia, all the natural laws of the universe are reversed and the world is turned upside down. JEHOVAH created women as helpers of men . . . and not as rulers to dominate them:

And JEHOVAH Elohim said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him"
(Genesis 2:18).

Here is that same verse about the beginning of the human race from the Douay-Rheims Version:

And the Lord God said: It is not good for man to be alone: let us make him a help like unto himself.

The Greek word genesis is the name of the first book of the Holy Bible and it means origin, beginning, or birth.

The Greeks are the protectors of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem!!

The Greeks have always been the protectors of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem.

By 1800, the GREAT Russian nation had expanded southward to the Black Sea. Georgia–an outpost of the British Empire–was absorbed into the Russian empire.

The Russian navy began to patrol the Mediterranean and the British maritime monopoly was about to end.

The present conflict pitting Britannia against the tiny Greek nation is ultimately about control of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem.

The Fourth Reich wants to destroy Greece completely and eliminate Russia from the Mediterranean.

All true Christians should pray daily for Greece that they will return to the true Alpha and Omega–Joshua of Nazareth–and that they all will resist the Fourth Reich with the courage of the Spartans of Thermopylae and Alexander the Great.

John Q. Publius #sexist #racist #dunning-kruger identitydixie.com

[From "Toxic Avengers: The Return of Aspirational Masculinity"]

Following the de-platforming of Republic Standard by the host, I’ve decided to re-post some of my favorites from my time there for your reading pleasure. Enjoy!

[...]

Did anyone expect, when we were hurtling toward Y2K and the late Senator Ted Stevens’s pneumatic tube-powered Information Super Highway that we would be discussing “trans women’s periods”? Instead of colonizing Mars? As the Soviet general in The Camp of the Saints lamented between sips of vodka: “We’re caught in the clutches of the great hermaphrodite, Zackaroff. We’re all its serfs. And we can’t even cut off its balls!” Yes, the neo-liberal project has given our civilization opioids and anti-depressants and a steady diet of appointments with the local psychoanalyst; it’s blessed us with hormone blockers for prepubescent children and demon-drag-queen story time and soon IUDs for first-graders. Lothrop Stoddard’s Revolt Against Civilization is in full swing:

Congenitally incapable of adjusting themselves to an advanced social order, the degenerate inevitably become its enemies—particularly those “high-grade defectives” who are the natural fomenters of social unrest. Of course, the environmentalist argues that social unrest is due to bad social conditions, but when we go into the matter more deeply we find that bad conditions are largely due to bad people. The mere presence of hordes of low-grade men and women condemned by their very natures to incompetency and failure automatically engender poverty, invite exploitation, and drag down others just above them in the social scale.

Such inequities can only be compounded by the ever-growing throngs of the maladjusted and violent who are mostly unable and/or unwilling to adapt to or maintain the rigors of success in the West. The victim mentality creates a power vacuum that will inevitably be filled by a more self-assured group or groups; thus assuring our conquest, the West will have been reduced to nothing but a bunch of genderless, species-less trans-abled amorphous blobs incapable of lifting a finger in self-defense. Otherwise, and perhaps a more likely outcome, in these conditions of fractured tribalism the country will “require” the installation of a ruthlessly totalitarian government headed and staffed, of course, by the managerial “elites”—and for the few hold-outs, as Frank Carter sang on Gallows’s “The Vulture”: “If the horses won’t drink, drown them in the water.”

This idea that it’s all men, or that it’s “toxic masculinity” that is the root cause of violence in our society is preposterous. It’s pretty simple, really—the Left finds itself unable to perform even a rudimentary analysis of the perpetrators of violence. Part of it is that modernity is making people crazy, but biological sub-groups (ie-races) differ dramatically in violent and anti-social behavior. The black share of homicides nationally has actually increased while their population share remains relatively static, and of course the vast majority of those homicides are committed by black males. This simple instance of a legitimate “toxic masculinity” is not a possible explanation, however, “because racism.” Therefore, the Left twists itself in ever-more absurd contortions to explain really rather simple explanations (another example is the “gender pay gap”).

We know that, on average, black children hit puberty first and Asian children last, which may have something to do with the advanced physical development of many blacks, which is particularly pronounced in the teen years relative to, say, whites or Asians. The ramifications in terms of brain development and verbal acuity and spatial reasoning remain somewhat less known, but we can draw inferences based on the available science. Ignoring fundamental differences between people, not to mention the wealth of quantifiable data that show strong correlations between specific behaviors and outcomes, is not going to lessen our problems. It’s going to make them worse—as we’re witnessing.

These “debates” are absolutely drenched in Leftist moralism, to the point where even pointing out well-established science is cause for professional and social termination. Rather than bending over backwards to find “hate crimes” and “systemic racism” to explain away black underachievement, would not a consideration of cognitive differences liberate the whole nation from this ceaseless pearl-clutching? There is no white conspiracy to marginalize blacks (at least none that I’m aware of), but there are evolved differences in intelligence that exacerbate group differences in an increasingly cognitively-intensive economy. These difference are no one’s fault but Mother Nature’s, unless of course the actual mother made poor in utero or child-rearing decisions (for example, black mothers are thirty times more likely than white mothers to give birth to a child with fetal alcohol syndrome, and are much more likely to use corporal punishment on their children, which is proven to affect cognitive development). Nevertheless, Leftist dogma renders an honest discussion impossible.

Haiti has been an independent country longer than Canada, New Zealand, Australia, or Ireland—all four were products of colonialism—and they have turned out just a little different I would say. The United States has only been independent a couple of decades longer than Haiti. Do you want to keep on blaming colonialism? How about Ethiopia, which minus five years has been an independent nation for millennia? We have been conditioned to accept equality of outcome when the biological inputs are so wildly divergent. This is patently absurd. As all populations increasingly have access to the same technologies, amenities, and advancements as everyone else, and the global economy becomes more cognitively-intensive, with an honest appraisal we can only expect the disparity in outcome between humanity’s haves and have-nots to widen ever-further without a full-bodied globalist tyranny.

Likewise, in the interests of furthering what’s mutated into the paradox that is modern feminism’s prudish Epicureanism—indeed in erasing the distinctions between man and woman by un-coupling gender from sex, which sort of defeats the purpose of feminism—the most appalling manifestations of totalitarianism are necessary to force the supremely unnatural, in the process destroying both masculinity and femininity by turning each sex into a shitty facsimile of the other and never the twain shall meet. Or is it the opposite, a melding of pregnant men and women soldiers into the Androgynes of the Future?

[...]

Women like sociologist Lisa Wade are too preoccupied with President Trump’s “carpe pussy” comments from over a decade ago to understand that the immigration restrictions/overhaul the majority of Americans support would stop immigrants and “refugees” from intractably misogynistic cultures from coming here and bringing their regressive attitudes toward women as chattel, barbaric practices such as female genital mutilation and honor killings, and a lack of restraint from sexually assaulting women either through non-existent impulse control or cultural entitlement.

[...]

To expand on the red pill metaphor, it is not just an awakening from The Matrix, but that red evokes the notion of consanguinity, or shared blood, the bonds of which, indeed, are thicker than water (typically colored or referred to as blue). The “red,” our republic’s life-blood, cannot survive without its people. The ultimate demise of the founding Roman noble families roughly corresponds to the time Caracalla extended full citizenship rights to the entire empire. “Democracy in action,” we might say, but without an aspirational core of true Roman families on which the empire could rest, the decline was not long after, for what is a Rome without Romans? Further, in the absence of expansion, the momentum of the empire ground to a halt, and its focus turned inward, both in conflict and in navel-gazing hedonism. This is not to suggest that the key to reviving the American nation is through resuscitating “54 40 or Fight,” but that after planting our flag on the moon we wasted trillions of dollars and decades of energy on “equality” and dragged (or in the case of Afghanistan and the Middle East are dragging) our military through morass after morass instead of securing the border and re-directing our eyes back to the heavens. This aspirational masculinity is at the heart of Western civilization and it drives our conquering spirit both literally and metaphorically. It is time we stopped cowering before inferior cultures and entitled parasites and re-assert what makes us the most spectacular civilization in human history. “Man up,” indeed: there is a very powerful message here, one which we would be wise to heed.