Similar posts

Unnamed Neo-Nazi demonstrators in Duisburg #wingnut #racist apnews.com

BERLIN (AP) — Germany’s leading Jewish organization expressed alarm Thursday over footage of flag-waving neo-Nazis in self-styled uniforms marching through an eastern German town on May Day unhindered by police.

Footage of the march Wednesday prompted widespread outrage in Germany and calls for authorities in the state of Saxony, where far-right sentiment is particularly strong, to step in.

“The images of the neo-Nazi march by The Third Way party in Plauen are disturbing and frightening,” said Josef Schuster, the head of Germany’s Central Council of Jews.

Noting that the rally took place on the eve of Yom HaShoah , the day when Jews commemorate the six million Jewish men, women and children murdered in the Holocaust, Schuster added that “right-wing extremists are marching in Saxony in a way that brings back memories of the darkest chapter in German history.”

German security agencies say The Third Way, a relatively small party, has close ties to far-right extremists. The march in Plauen took place to the beat of heavy drums made to look like those used by the Hitler Youth. Participants shouted slogans such as “Criminal foreigners out!” and “National socialism now!”

Saxony police said several hundred people took part in the march. Counter-protesters were kept away.

Police said they are investigating nine people for illegally covering their faces during the event and another for insulting an officer, but described the day as a success from a policing perspective because there was no violence.

Various Commenters #racist #wingnut amren.com

RE: Large Venezuelan Migration Sparks Xenophobic Backlash in Colombia

(zuuluuz)

Hypocritic Hispanic crybabies.

And in that case it seems even more strange because as far as I know the majority of Venezuelans are mestizos like the majority of Colombians so it's the same race, unlike the people coming across the southern border of the US.

(America first)
Hispanics can’t even get along with other Hispanics, yet they want me to believe that they are going to get along great with Whites, Blacks, and Asians.

(Floridian)
Back in the 1980s, 20 percent of the population of oil-rich Venezuela consisted of Colombian immigrants. Socialism has sent all the Colombians plus millions of native Venezuelans back across the border. Now that the Democrat Party has achieved the total power they have long lusted for, they will make the US into North Venezuela. Mexico had better get ready for a large influx not only of Mexican-Americans but of actual Americans as well.

(Joe Dixon)
Biden's going to invite them all into the United States soon, what's another 5-10 million hispanic immigrants when you've already got 100 million. Just think of all that cultural enrichment, diversity and votes for the democrat party.

(IstvanIN)

The message that Venezuelan migrants are no longer welcome comes from average Colombian citizens and powerful government officials alike. Last week, for example, Colombian President Iván Duque announced that undocumented Venezuelan migrants would not receive vaccinations for the coronavirus despite concerns from refugee agencies that this policy could lead to more infections.

“Of course they won’t get it,” Duque told a Bogotá radio station. “Otherwise we would have a stampede with the whole world crossing the border to get vaccinated.”

Common sense to take care of your own first.

(Honest_Bob)
Just another npr sob story to import more of them here.

They are on their way to chant Biden, Biden at the border.

Dave Truesdale #racist #wingnut web.archive.org

(Basically, SF is for white, cis hetro males, by white, cis, hetero males. Anyone else is culturally appropriating it.)
The SF field has always been open to everyone at every level, so the basic anti-diversity claim from the Woke crowd is an outright lie. This has been pointed out to them on numerous occasions over the years, yet they persist in the lie, repeat it often and ever louder, thus revealing their own disingenuous nature, and all the while labeling anyone who disagrees with their viewpoint a racist, sexist, homophobe, because these are the tried and true strawmen guaranteed to shut down any argument.

They scream and holler about cultural appropriation when it comes to the white oppressors in SF, yet use smears and intimidation3 to aid in their attempts to appropriate (and thus balkanize–divide and conquer) the SF field in service to the lie born of the double helix comprised of their social/political agenda of non-diversity in the field.

William Patton #racist #wingnut quora.com

Why are some people so against Liberals?
The progressive liberal belief in absolute equality is daily affronted by the reality of intractable racial differences. It has been over 150 years since the demise of slavery and 60 years since the demise of segregation. Neither abolition or integration has brought about the liberal utopia.

How do liberals explain this chasm between reality and their ideals and expectations? They do what all liberals do. They explain it through a combination of hysteria, denial and conspiracy theories. Even if there are no actual racists oppressing black people, they are being oppressed by the mysterious forces of “systemic racism” and “institutional racism.” White people benefit from the invisible knapsack of “white privilege.” As the evil oppressors of blacks, the only way to bring about true equality and to establish a just society is to treat white people differently than black people. White people have to be punished for their unwitting sins and the sins of their ancestors. This is “social justice” or “racial justice.”

In such a way, the twisted logic of progressive liberalism leads back to racial hierarchy, inequality and the ‘racism’ they claim to hate. Oddly enough, it leads to both intolerance and bigotry, and the loss of liberty and equality.

From a non-liberal perspective, it is utterly alien:

[photos of African-American women protesting, a mural of George Floyd as an angel]

Jared Taylor #racist #wingnut amren.com

Is It Time for Secession?

Are the United States ripe for partition? Francis Herbert Buckley, a lawyer and academic who has taught at McGill and is now at George Mason School of Law, thinks they are. “In all the ways that matter, save for the naked force of the law, we are already divided into two nations just as much as in 1861,” he writes. “The contempt for opponents, the Twitter mobs, online shaming and no-platforming, the growing tolerance of violence — it all suggests we would be happier in separate countries.”

It’s a great step forward that a separatist can find a respectable publisher — even if it claims to sell “books for smart conservatives.” American Secession reports that there is a lot of support for separation and offers good reasons for it but, alas, only hints at the most compelling reason.

Prof. Buckley makes much of a 2018 poll that found fully 39 percent of Americans — including 42 percent of Democrats — wanted to secede. Presumably there would have been fewer secessionist Democrats under President Obama. Another 2018 poll found that 31 percent of Americans thought there would be a civil war within the next five years. I don’t take these numbers very seriously; wild talk is cheap. But I think Prof. Buckley is right to underline a recent Gallup finding that only 44 percent of Americans would be wiling to fight for their country. Surely, he is correct to say that far fewer would fight to stop an American state from seceding.

Many people think that 700,000 dead Civil War soldiers settled the question of secession, but Prof. Buckley disagrees. He argues that the Framers clearly thought the states had the right to secede. James Madison believed any attempt to keep states in by force would be wrong and “would look more like a declaration of war.” Virginia joined the United States with the express proviso that it had the right to bolt. New England states that didn’t like the War of 1812 didn’t debate the legality of secession; only whether to do it.

Abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison thought the slave-holding states should be expelled if they didn’t have the grace to leave, and wanted to hold a national Disunion Convention to expel then. On July 4, 1854, he told an Independence Day crowd that because the Constitution implicitly recognized slavery, it was “a covenant with death and an agreement with hell.” He then burned a copy, saying “So perish all compromises with tyranny!”

James Buchanan, who was president when the Southern states began to leave, believed they should not be forced to stay:

The fact is that our union rests upon public opinion, and can never be cemented by the blood of its citizens shed in civil war. If it cannot live in the affections of the people, it must one day parish.

Before South Carolina hotheads fired on Fort Sumter, even Abraham Lincoln wavered: “Would the marching of an army into South Carolina . . . without the consent of her people, and in hostility against them, be coercion or invasion? I very frankly say, I think it would be invasion.”

Prof. Buckley reminds us that even now, there is one way to leave that everyone would agree is legal. The Founders believed the federal government would never give up power voluntarily — they were right — and that’s why they wrote Article V of the Constitution. It lets the states bypass the federal government to amend or even abolish the Constitution. If 34 state legislatures agree, there will be a constitutional convention at which anything goes. If 38 states then ratify the changes, that’s the new constitution — which could recognize secession or even sanction a partition. “Secession cannot be unconstitutional,” writes Prof. Buckley, “when there’s a constitutional way of making it happen, through a constitutional convention.”

I don’t think any of that would be necessary, because the federal government wouldn’t today invade a seceding state. As I wrote nine years ago, Americans don’t have the stomach to slaughter fellow Americans just to keep their corpses within the union. If a state wanted to make a serious go of it — especially for “progressive” reasons — the coast is clear, and as Prof. Buckley notes, these days, it is lefties who promote secession.

One of the best-known breakaway movements is in California, and Mr. Trump’s 2016 victory gave it a boost. The state already has legal marijuana despite federal drug laws and it loves illegal immigrants. The “Calexit” movement is run by people who think: “California loses billions of dollars every day [in federal taxes] supporting states whose people hate us and our culture. Let’s keep our taxes in California and invest in our people first.” Prof. Buckley notes that this sounds like “California first” or even “make California great again” and almost implies an anti-conservative immigration policy. The point is, many Californians hate Donald Trump and want out.

Vermont is so full of goofy liberals it has Bernie Sanders for a senator; it has also long been a nest of secessionists.

The Cascadia movement would make an independent country out of Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia and would, as Prof. Buckley puts it “unite people with the same kinds of ideas about the environment, Starbucks and yoga.” If the President gets a second term, Prof. Buckley can imagine Democrats calling for resistance in the streets.

They already have. The manager of a Red Hen restaurant proudly refused service to White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, and a woman jostled and screamed at White House counselor Kellyanne Conway. Black congresswoman Maxine Waters then urged Democrats to mob and humiliate any Trump cabinet members they saw in public.

This is all part of the nastiness Prof. Buckley says is a sign of irreconcilable differences. Examples he cites are a 2017 article in Foreign Policy — not normally a crackpot magazine — claiming that “for the first time in America’s history, a Nazi sympathizer occupied the Oval Office.” Prof. Buckley also remembers that when Michelle Obama said that “when they [our opponents] go low we go high,” Attorney General Eric Holder corrected her: “No, no, when they go low, we kick them.” When Republican Senator Rand Paul was attacked and suffered six broken ribs and lung damage, MSNBC host Kasie Hunt laughingly said it was one of her “favorite stories.” Reporters routinely write vile stories about Republicans that would have got them fired in more civil times, but the point of today’s journalism is, in Prof. Buckley’s words, to let readers “feast on their hatreds.”

The last go at secession didn’t end well, and perhaps because he was born in Canada, Prof. Buckley understands something about it most Americans don’t: The further we get from the Civil War, the more we are supposed to revile the Confederates. The people who were actually trying to kill each other became friends. President Grant invited Robert E. Lee for a visit to the White House, and on the 50th anniversary of Pickett’s charge, veterans from both sides met on Cemetery Ridge and embraced each other. There was a popular television series, The Grey Ghost, in which Confederates were the heroes, and, as Prof. Buckley writes, “From their defeat, white southerners were permitted to retain some measure of dignity in the memory of their battlefield heroes.” Not anymore. Anything Confederate or even Southern is worse than leprosy, and “if millions of people in one section of the country are told they’re presumptively evil, and that the presumption really can’t be rebutted, they’re going to wonder if they belong somewhere else.”

But as Prof. Buckley recognizes, there is an even more testy divide: “Now the divisions are broader than North versus South. It’s liberals versus conservative and especially progressives versus Trump supporters.” “In our politics,” he adds, “we are already two nations.” One likely split would be to hive off the two coasts and leave the middle, making three countries.

That would make smaller countries, but Prof. Buckley says they would be better countries. He makes much of the fact that the people who claim to be the happiest in the world live in small countries (he ignores the fact that they live in white countries). They have governments that are close to the people and if they are homogenous, they have a sense of community. One disadvantage of big countries is that they spend more than they need to on weapons. America, China, and Russia don’t need anything like all the firepower they have, but their leaders like being able to swagger around the globe. Prof. Buckley thinks their citizens may not care. In the United States, it is the 700 to 1,000 defense-industry lobbyists — about two per congressman — who keep the defense budget fat.

The military-industrial complex is a good example of the dangers of size. Prof. Buckley argues that big countries have a lot of corruption because their governments spend huge sums people love to divert. He makes an interesting point: The kinds of political corruption that are actually illegal — bribery, extortion, mail fraud, vote-buying — are the least of our problems. Campaign contributions and lobbying are far worse, and are perfectly legal. After they leave office, about half of all congressmen become lobbyists, and make much more than they ever did as “public servants.” While they’re in office, they vote on bills with an eye to pleasing their future paymasters.

Prof. Buckley does note one clear advantage of size: free trade. Imagine, he writes, what it was like under the Articles of Confederation, with states taxing goods from other states. However, this problem could be solved through a common market of the kind that has enriched Europe.

Prof. Buckley recognizes that outright secession is unlikely, despite its advantages, so he proposes a middle ground: home rule. States would make all their own laws but leave foreign policy to the feds. All the hot issues — same-sex marriage, gun rights, abortion, public prayer, drug laws — would be thrashed out locally. If Americans were free to move to whatever state suited them, everyone could find a place to be happy.

This, is of course, was what the Founders wanted, and until the 20th century, and the federal government touched most people only when they went to the post office. Now, as Prof. Buckley points out, the feds want to run our lives for us. They are helped by a Supreme Court that has become the final arbiter of tough problems and forces the same solutions on every state. Federalism was supposed to be a compromise to get the best of both small and large government, but a ruthlessly centralizing United States is destroying all the advantages of smallness.

Home rule would be much better than what we have now. American Secession is fine as far as it goes, but it doesn’t go far enough. Prof. Buckley does note that “diversity” is not an advantage for a country, but I don’t remember a single occurrence of the word “race.” Prof. Buckley admits that at one time the country was coherent — British and Protestant — “but if we were ever that, we’re certainly not that today.” He goes on: “Our constitution has been justly admired, but it was made for a citizenry very different from the angry Americans of today.” And on: “The constitution was designed for another country, one in which people agreed on fundamental principles, and that’s not today’s America.”

What happened to yesterday’s America? Prof. Buckley gives us a hint with one of his diagnoses of why the country is splitting apart politically: “With their identity politics, the Democrats have become the intersectional party of racial and sexual minorities, of immigrants and feminists.” This is certainly true, but Prof. Buckley fails to note that the most bitter and enduring fault line is race. Instead, he trots out nonsense: “Other countries have their common cultures or religions. What America has is an idea that constitutes our identity as Americans, and that idea is liberalism in the classical sense.” The Founders would have been astounded to be told that they were starting a country with an identity that was nothing but an idea.

Prof. Buckley also argues that no secession movement would repeal civil rights laws or follow racial contours. That might be true for goofy-liberal secessionists in California or Vermont, but a split along current political-party lines, would be implicitly racial. As the partition was worked out, the racial divide might even become explicit.

It is strange that conservatives are so unwilling to recognize the importance of race while liberals, in their perverse way, are often obsessed with it. Still, this book is progress. Anyone who recognizes that people are better off separate — for whatever reason — is preparing the way for the kind of racial separation that many whites yearn for.

Diversity Macht Frei and Renaud Camus #racist #wingnut #conspiracy dailystormer.name

[From "French Writer Renaud Camus May Face Prosecution Over 'Condoms for Africa' Tweet"]

Renaud Camus, the French writer who coined the phrase “Great Replacement” has again been indicted for wrongspeech in France.

The complaint was over a tweet he posted last week which translates as follows:

“A box of condoms offered in Africa, that’s three fewer people drowned in the Mediterranean, a hundred thousand euros in savings for the French benefits system, two prison cells freed up and three centimetres of ice shelf preserved.”

image

Back in the 70s, the Jews successfully lobbied for reforms to speech laws that would allow third parties to file complaints, rather than just the people directly affected by the supposed wrongspeech. Since then, the limits of free speech in France have largely been determined by Jewish “anti-racism” organisations.

In this case, the organisation filing the complaint is LICRA (International League Against Racism and Antisemitism), a quintessentially Jewish organisation that has brought in a few browns to make it look real. It started life as the “League Against Pogroms”, its mission being to secure the acquittal of a Jew who had murdered a visiting Ukrainian dignitary, with the claim that he had been involved in pogroms. The Jew did indeed get away with murder on that occasion and Jews have been getting away with murder ever since.

Camus makes a point of public advocacy using his own name, disdaining anonymity. This is noble. But its practical result is criminal conviction. We’re living in a system that isn’t fair, that is, in fact, genuinely genocidal and tyrannical. We have a ruling class committed to bringing about our ethnic extinction, one that seemingly sincerely believes the mere assertion of our right to exist constitutes some strange species of wickedness that merits the severest persecution. Trying to play the game as if this were a contest of honour between gentlemen is only likely to have unhappy results.

Hunter Wallace #racist #wingnut occidentaldissent.com

Gov. Bill Lee Wants To Get Rid of Nathan Bedford Forrest Day

Gov. Bill Lee has a “philosophical belief” that refugees should be resettled in Tennessee. He is also introducing legislation to get rid of Nathan Bedford Forrest Day because he wants Black Lives Matter activists to know that is where his heart is on the issue.

AP

“NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Gov. Bill Lee will introduce legislation this year that would amend a law requiring Tennessee to honor Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, an early leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

Lee’s office confirmed Friday that the Republican, who has previously expressed his displeasure over the honor, was working on the bill. The office did not provide further details. …

Lee received national backlash in July when he not only signed the Nathan Bedford Forrest proclamation, but also declined to answer reporter questions over whether he thought the law should change. Lee later clarified that he didn’t like signing the proclamation and would prefer to see the law changed.

[...]

I will continue to search for Republicans who have any redeeming qualities and who aren’t just con artists who cater to wealthy donors and business lobbyists.

Henry Delacroix #racist #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "So You Want To Build A Mannerbund"]

It is one of the most used terms in our sphere. It is something that frightens the left. It is a means to build a tribe, develop a society and seed a civilization. It is a way for men to raid, control or dominate a territory. It is something many segments of the dissident right discusses building offline. It is the mannerbund.

Whether explicitly using the term or not, all pieces of the right that are on the edge of the Overton Window our outside of it discuss attempts at networking that involve building what amounts to a trusted mannerbund. It would be useful to research what it takes to make a mannerbund work. It cannot just be beers and a posting career. For no more than ten dollars, one can read up on, arguably, the greatest mannerbund created of all time: the [I]Afrikaner Broederbond[/I].

The Broederbond was a secret society exclusively made up of Calvinist Afrikaner males. Its origins were very modest. It was eighteen young men coming together to discuss the state of the Afrikaner people. In 1921, they decided to make it an official secret society with roughly forty men. This was a society of men who within a generation would capture a national government and proceed to run it for the next forty years.

This was a group that transitioned from a more culturally focused society to a secret society that was bent on capturing power and using it for the benefit of its people. Who were its people? In short, the Afrikaners were the bad euros of South Africa who worked the land, were sharpshooting frontiers types, and pioneers who were battered and eventually defeated by the British Empire in a series of events. Major cultural and social events were the Great Trek or Voortrek, when Boers first were expelled from the Cape Colony by Anglos, and the two, brutal Boer Wars, when Boers were finally crushed by the Anglos all thanks to diamond and gold discoveries. For a recent historical survey of South Africa’s formation, Diamonds, Gold and War is a fair book on this process. These were tough people tied to the land ruled over by an occupation government of Anglos who imposed their culture and ways on them while lording political power over the economically and politically dispossessed Afrikaners.

[...]

The year 1948 is the key for the Broederbond. In that year, the 1948 election allowed them to assume control of the national government and not look back until they stabbed their people in the stomach decades later. Each Prime Minister or President from 1948 until the end of apartheid had been a broeder. Once they won electoral victory, they took the nearly 3,000 Broederbond members and dispersed them throughout key government agencies. These men also knew other politically reliable or sympathetic men to place in charge of key nodes. These nodes were often nodes in control of hiring and firing employees. They removed obstacles and unreliable individuals. Personnel is policy. They had the personnel to enact policy.

[...]

They made mistakes, too. They did not have ideological firmness. They softened up. They allowed the thirst for cheap labor to suck in bigger immigration populations that created more problems. They tied their rationale for rule to a church, nominally their church, but ultimately, outside of their total control. This would hurt them later on as apartheid became a hotter topic. It is curious to read how the global ostracism in sporting events bothered them. One could argue they should have allowed mixed teams for PR purposes to the globe or that they never should have cared for lame international global events for something as dumb as sport. They also fell for the dumb right wing idea that you leave the opponent’s institutions intact because principles or something abstract. They did not shut down Anglo universities. They did not shut down the Anglo press. In short, compared to the communists, they did not have the will to neuter their internal enemies or encourage them to emigrate.

Some observers note how the Afrikaners gave in just before they could secure sovereignty as the commodities source for China as the industrial giant grew. China did fund communist insurgents, but the situation was changing in the ’90s for China. South Africa sending resources to neuter the effects of BDS by the West would have worked. The end of apartheid was right before China took off, but even then, BDS did not cause the Afrikaners to give in. They did it to themselves.

The Broederbond was at the vanguard of ending apartheid. Their leaders had been softening for years, supporting policy changes and debating others that a decade earlier would have never been considered. In 1978, their leader Gerrit Viljoen had decided with the inner council that transitioning to a future with a black president was going to happen, and they would lead it. This was an elite betrayal of the population it had proclaimed for decades to be representing. The year 1978 is interesting as this was the year when the big leak of Broederbond internal documents that was the source for the major news expose and book on the Broederbond was released. Thousands of members were doxed, so to speak, and one wonders if this was a coordinated operation by the inner council to put a shinier face on their secret organization as things heated up in the republic. One believes they ultimately wanted to be accepted by the West more than lead and build an awesome civilization of their own. Rather than a hermit kingdom, they chose to be enriched by the global elite as they knifed the small Afrikaners in the back.

Michelle Malkin #racist #wingnut #conspiracy amren.com

Red China’s Infection of US Classrooms

Dangerous menaces are spreading from mainland China to the United States. Surgical masks and Big Pharma vaccines, however, won’t protect this nation from its infiltration. The problem doesn’t lie with bats. It lies with America’s batty pursuit of globalization at all costs.

Chinese Communist Party agents are using our suicidal pathologies — blind worship of “diversity,” naive exaltation of “cultural exchange” programs, and reckless surrender of our education system — against us for economic espionage, intellectual property theft and world dominance. While Beltway blowhards rail against foreign interference in our elections, Beijing’s hijacking of our classrooms ensues with hardly a peep of political resistance.

On Monday, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston announced that the chairman of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department, along with two Chinese nationals, have been “charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.” Acclaimed Harvard chemist and nanoscientist, Dr. Charles Lieber, had served as a “strategic scientist” at Wuhan University of Technology for the past nine years and is accused of lying about his role as a “contractual participant” of China’s infamous Thousand Talents Plan.

Last fall, after years of intel warnings, a bipartisan Senate committee blew the whistle on TTP’s systematic recruitment of an estimated 7,000 academics who have agreed to “transmit the knowledge and research they gain here to China in exchange for salaries, research funding, lab space, and other incentives.” Lieber reportedly received $50,000 a month plus living expenses and more than $1.5 million for a Chinese research lab, all while soaking up $15 million in federal grants from the National Institutes of Health and Defense Department.

It is unknown how many Chinese nationals worked in either Lieber’s America-based or China-based labs. But the two Chinese nationals charged with Lieber were cancer researcher Zaosong Zheng, 29, whom Harvard sponsored on a J-1 work-study exchange visa and Yanqing Ye, 29, whom Boston University sponsored on a J-1. Prosecutors allege Ye is a CCP member and top military lieutenant. Zheng is accused of attempting to smuggle “21 vials of biological research” aboard a flight destined for China.

Those are just a few who got caught. In 2018-2019, China sent the most international students from around the world (369,548 out of nearly 1.1 million) to study in U.S. institutions. More than 71,000 Chinese students headed to Massachusetts; 6,222 of them embedded at Harvard and 10,598 of them enrolled at Boston University. Those figures don’t include their spouses and children, who are also welcomed through their own special visa programs. (And the national security risks of the untold tens of thousands of Chinese nationals on the H-1B tech worker visa is a whole ‘nuther story.)

China has cunningly exploited America’s alphabet soup of temporary visa programs, which are overwhelmed by out-of-control mass migration and are operated by open borders ideologues who put the alleged economic benefits of admitting 1 million international students into the country every year over the national security risks. Top administrators at Harvard and other prestigious universities have continually denounced the Trump administration for increasing vetting of foreign student visas and inconveniencing their wealthy clientele.

But mum’s the word on the treachery taking place under the guise of “cultural” enrichment:

Last July, the FBI indicted Chinese F-1 student visa beneficiary Weiyun “Kelly” Huang in an alleged visa fraud scheme that allowed more than 2,500 Chinese foreign students on F-1 — including a purported spy for the Chinese government — to extend their stays by claiming employment with a phony internet front she created. The ruse allowed the scammers to take advantage of the uncapped Optional Practical Training program allowing F-1s to stay an extra three years to work. Ji Chaoqun, an F-1 who received a master’s degree in electrical engineering in 2015 from an unspecified U.S. university, paid for Huang’s services and was arrested in 2018 for alleged spying and recruitment of academics and engineers under the direction of the People’s Republic of China.

In September, the FBI arrested Chinese national Zhongsan Liu in New Jersey for operating a fraudulent J-1 visa racket that imported PRC operatives to staff a New York front group recruiting scientists, academics and engineers to work in China. Liu targeted seven American universities for the scheme, including the University of Massachusetts Boston.

Just last week, the University of Missouri at Columbia announced it was terminating its partnership with a Chinese government-funded language and cultural program called the Confucius Institute amid widespread national security concerns. The Institute’s teachers were pouring into local K-12 schools through the J-1 visa program unsupervised. The U.S. Government Accountability Office identified more than 500 “Confucius Institutes” worldwide, with 96 located at colleges and universities in the United States as of December 2018 — the vast majority of them publicly funded institutions. A PRC propaganda outfit called Hanban has provided funding ranging from $900,000 to $1.7 million for “model” Confucius Institutes.
While several universities have closed their programs, several Chinese language charter schools and entire school districts, including K-12 public schools in Broward County, Florida, Houston and Seattle, operate “Confucius Classrooms” approved and co-operated with the Chinese government.

Where’s a nationwide public health emergency declaration when you need one?

Chris Roberts #racist #wingnut amren.com

Context is King: How the Left Talks About Demographic Change

Gregory Hood is fond of saying, “Politics is about who, not what.” Nothing confirms this more than how leftist media write about demographic change. If whites object to being displaced, it’s not even happening, and even if it is, whites are paranoid. When demographic change brings leftist victories or when it displaces leftist pets, it’s real and significant.

In March, The Guardian published this headline, “White nationalist hate groups have grown 55% in Trump era, report finds.” The subtitle was “Southern Poverty Law Center warns of growing movement driven by ‘fear of demographic change’” — implying that such fears are silly and unfounded.

But in a 2017 essay called “‘Nothing is ours anymore’: Kurds forced out of Afrin after Turkish assault,” The Guardian found similar fears for Kurds living in Syria serious and worrisome:

There is definitely a demographic change, a lot of Kurds have been forcibly displaced on the count that they’re with the PKK when in fact they weren’t. There are barely any Kurds left in Afrin, no one is helping us go back.

Another Afrin local, Shiyar Khalil, 32, said: “When the Kurds try to get back to their house they have to jump through hoops. You cannot deny a demographic change, Kurds are not able to go back. Women are veiled, bars are closed; it’s a deliberate erasing of Kurdish culture.

Salon is just as inconsistent. After Barack Obama’s reelection in 2012, it published an article called “The final defeat of backlash politics.” This is from its opening paragraph:

A new, increasingly liberal electorate has ratified the results of the New Deal and the Civil Rights Revolution. Republican conservatives will still be able to win victories, but their hopes of overturning the outcomes of the 1930s and the 1960s have been doomed by cultural and demographic change.

But a 2017 article from the same website suggests that if Trump supporters take change seriously, they are falling for a “a false narrative of white victimhood“:

[President Trump’s white supporters] feel they are living through rapid demographic change that will leave them as a minority of the population.

Note how the first Salon quote uses the word “doomed” to describe the impact of demographic change, while the second uses “feel” to make the worries of whites sound subjective and perhaps irrational.

The leftist magazine The Nation is no better. A 2019 essay called “The ‘Great Replacement’ Is a Genocidal Playbook” (“The Great Replacement” is shorthand for mass population change at the expense of whites) puts scare quotes around the phrase to reinforce the idea that it’s a myth:

image

When The Nation approves of what’s happening it understands that demographics are destiny. This is from “As California Goes . . . “:

Demographically, what California was a generation ago, America is now; what California is, America is likely to become. The Golden State, for all its reputed liberalism and its rapid Hispanicization, may not be so different from the rest of the nation, just a generation or two ahead of it.

There doesn’t seem to be one leftist outlet that doesn’t follow this double standard. Jacobin opposes demographic change in Israel and Syria:

Elsewhere this has initiated full-blown attempts at “Judaization.” After 1967, the Israeli government became concerned about the lack of Jews living in the north and south of the state and so planned to increase the population in those areas. Such a demographic change necessitated the confiscation of Palestinian land for the building of Jewish settlements. — No, Israel Is Not a Democracy, Ilan Pappe, May 2017

Those who stayed in Afrin [Syria] fared little better. . . .The new occupiers themselves imposed demographic change and extended “Turkification” policies from Turkey’s Kurdish southeast into northern Syria. — Ignoring Afrin, Gokcan Aydogan, et al, September 2018

But Jacobin would never write about the “full-blown ‘Hispanicization’ of California public schools.”

The Daily Beast, whose tech reporter Will Sommer specializes in mocking the Right, published the following claim about a “great replacement” with no caveats:

The depopulation of Palestine was no accident. The Zionist movement sought to create a Jewish state in a territory where Jews were a minority. On the eve of the Nakba, Jews constituted 30 percent of the population and owned 7 percent of the land. Within months, they forged a state on 78 percent of the territory where they flipped the demographic ratio from 30:70 Jews to Arabs to 90:10. To think such dramatic demographic change happens by accident—only coincidently suiting decades old Zionist aims—is dangerous naiveté. Such things happen only by design. — Nakba Denials Must Be Condemned, Yousef Munayyer, July 13, 2017

The Left understands demographic change; it just doesn’t want whites to notice it’s happening.

Six years ago, a “purple” Georgia was a pipe dream. Now, in a year when Republicans have the national advantage, it’s a possibility. The pace of demographic change is so fast that, soon enough, Democrats like [Stacey] Abrams won’t have to work to change the electorate—it will have happened on its own.

Paul Kersey was not the author. It was a black liberal named Jamelle Bouie, writing for Slate. Mr. Bouie has since been hired by the New York Times and Paul Kersey has been attacked by it. That’s because Mr. Bouie is happy to see these changes, and Mr. Kersey isn’t.

Awake Carolina #crackpot #racist #wingnut #conspiracy awakecarolina.com

Orgonite is a substance which functions as a self-driven, continuously operating, highly efficient energy transmutation device, drawing in negative life energy and transmuting it into positive energy.

A so called pseudoscience concept variously described as an esoteric energy or hypothetical universal life force. In reality orgone energy is very real and simply was too advanced for many to comprehend considering it applies to metaphysical invisible energy fields.

These fields of invisibility have grown of further importance in the 21st century especially within the last decade. Since 2012, benevolent ETs and malevolent extraterrestrial species have gone mainstream with the help of certain whistleblowers such as Secret Space Program Mi-Lab Naval Intelligence and Antarctica Insider Corey Goode, author and presenter David Icke, television icon and author David Wilcock (host of Cosmic Disclosure, special guest speaker on Ancient Aliens Television Series, and co-director of Above Majestic the 2017 best selling Documentary on Amazon Prime despite mass censorship by the elite networks running the globe)

Some claim the current era we live in -- 2020 AD -- is dubbed the silent war by ex-military insiders and Qanon experts alongside Anonymous activists worldwide. The internet has become a battleground and the invisible spectrum which includes wifi technology (invisible to the naked eye) and 5G radiation poisoning. The wifi waves and radio waves go largely undetected by the people living amongst this electric grid of radiation and mind control technologies. MK ULTRA and Remote Viewing by The CIA were first steps to launching this "invisible war" or as some like myself call it, "the silent slow on-set mental illness pandemic" or "silent holocaust" considering we live in a gas chamber.

Why do I claim we live in a gas chamber such as those originally believed to be utilized during WW2 and Nazi Germany? We obviously know now that the detention camps not "concentration camps" were created to relocate the Jewish population to Madagascar and even camps such as Aushwitz had movie nights and treated the population of incarcerated prisoners much more humane and our public school textbooks indoctrinated us with misinformation which favored the Zionist oppressors who exterminated their own brethren at the end of the war. The biased one sided approach to the holocaust teachings in school is the same reason we learn about Thomas Edison and Albert Einstein rather than Wilhelm Reich and Nikolas Tesla. The same reason we are taught the wonderful things accomplished by Albert Einstein without mentioning his non-Jewish colleagues and competitors within the theories of his science. Science has become a forcefully indoctrinated and secular religion of cult esque manipulation. The difference between pseudoscience and science according to Albert Pike in his Masonic novel "Morals and Dogma" is nothing but who believes what they are told whom are considered sheep in today's society or some people deem the unintelligent men and women who think they are intelligent due to their economic income or bachelor's degree, "muggles"

One does not need a degree from a university owned by Rothschild Zionists, Blasphemous Freemasons, Roman Catholic Pedophiles, and Jesuit Oath Takers to be intelligent. Rather one who does his own research is commonly more intelligent than his counterparts who work for the man and stress themselves and their poor little lives during the daily morning commute to work for a corporate conglomerate who shits on the people as a whole. Most individuals who strive to greatness are college dropouts and inspired by their own readings. Not what they've been told to read, which makes the biggest difference in wisdom. Wisdom is more important than silver and gold and that is foretold by the bible.

On we go to discuss orgone energy and EMF protection and the new dangers of 5G satellites and 5G phones and 5G towers of death ray weaponry and stingray technology. UHF waves and LF waves to offset the human spiritual alignment with God himself. The goal of the New World Order is to convince the public that the Devil isn't real and God is a fictional character alongside his son whom is my lord and savior Jesus Christ. Amen.

You Are Now Enriched #racist amren.com

Greg Johnson said that 1. he hopes Romney loses because he deserves to, and 2. Obama is good for White nationalism because he puts an undeniable black face on our problems.

During the campaign, I noticed more overt anti White hatred spewing from MSM than probably ever before in our history. O'Reilly is steamed about it, and last night he said he'll take it on and call it out. (All he'll do is draw attention to it, but he won't really debate it.) But "get Whitey" is now institutionalized in our culture. That should frighten you and serve as a warning. In a "get Whitey" culture, you can never relax and must always assume that since you are a target, somebody has you in their sights.

So here we are: four more of Obama, and growing anti White hatred, mixed with harsher measures to put us all under BRA Diversity. God, how hideous it will be!

We are at a point of "intersection": 1. the Gay Agenda has won the culture and institutions and will destroy the families not yet destroyed by feminism, drugs, porn, the pill, and abortion, 2. Islamofication is close behind, and now Christian churches are embracing InterFaith Chrislam, 3. Overt hatred and violence against Whites will become mainstreamed to the point of commonplace.

EVERYTHING FALLS APART from now on. In the chaos, you will be victimized.

This is Post 9/11 America. Obama was their second attack.

It all churns toward a Day of Reckoning, and justice will be what you can work out in your own neighborhood. Gold won't do you any good.

Hunter Wallace #racist #wingnut occidentaldissent.com

[From "Southern History Series: The White League of Louisiana"]

Editor’s Note: The Rainbow Confederates are unable to explain why thousands of Confederate veterans banded together to overthrow the government of Louisiana during Reconstruction instead of settling down to enjoy the fruits of the new multiracial democratic paradise.

The following excerpt which appeared in The Franklin Enterprise before the election of 1874 describes the formation of the White League in Louisiana during the later days of Reconstruction. It comes from Stephen Budiansky’s book The Bloody Shirt: Terror After The Civil War:

“We ask for no assistance; we protest against any intervention. We own this soil of Louisiana, by virtue of our endeavor, as a heritage from our ancestors, and it is ours, and ours alone. Science, literature, history, art, civilization, and law belong alone to us, and not to the negroes. They have no record but barbarism and idolatry, nothing since the war but that of error, incapacity, beastliness, voudouism, and crime. Their right to vote is but the result of the war, their exercise of it a monstrous imposition, and a vindictive punishment upon us for that ill-advised rebellion.

Therefore we are banding together in a White League army, drawn up only on the defensive, exasperated by continual wrong, it is true, but acting under Christian and high-principled leaders, and determined to defeat these negroes in their infamous design of depriving us of all we hold sacred and precious on the soil of our nativity or adoption, or perish in the attempt.

Come what may, upon the radical party must rest the whole responsibility of this conflict, as sure as there is a just God in heaven, their unnatural, cold-blooded and revengeful measures of reconstruction in Louisiana will meet with a terrible retribution.”

Here is the platform of the White League:

“Disregarding all minor questions of principle or policy, and having solely in view the maintenance of our hereditary civilization and Christianity menaced by a stupid Africanization, we appeal to men of our race, of whatever language or nationality, to unite with us against that supreme danger. A league of whites is the inevitable result of that formidable, oath-bound, and blindly obedient league of the blacks, which, under the command of the most cunning and unscrupulous negroes in the State, may at any moment plunge us into a war of races . . . It is with some hope that a timely and proclaimed union of the whites as a race, and their efficient preparation for any emergency, may arrest the threatened horrors of social war, and teach the blacks to beware of further insolence and aggression, that we call upon the men of our race to leave in abeyance all lesser considerations; to forget all differences of opinions and all race prejudices of the past, and with no object in view but the common good of both races, to unite with us in an earnest effort to re-establish a white man’s government in the city and the State.”

Does that sound like the eternal principles of classical liberalism? In Louisiana and other Southern states, classical liberalism to the extent it ever existed here was always counterbalanced by the even more powerful authoritarian forces of slavery and white supremacy.

Louisiana was one of three Southern states with black majorities which had the worst, most bitter experience with Reconstruction. The other two states were Mississippi and South Carolina. The enfranchisement of the former slaves and the disenfranchisement of Confederate veterans by the Radical Republicans produced an explosive situation in the state. Louisiana came to be ruled by carpetbaggers who plundered the prostrate state on the basis of the black vote.

The White League was a paramilitary organization composed of Confederate veterans which fought to restore white supremacy in Louisiana. This culminated in the Battle of Liberty Place in 1874 when 5,000 members of the White League fought and defeated the forces of the Republican carpetbag governor in the streets of New Orleans. The White League actually took New Orleans and the Louisiana State House, but was forced to withdraw after President Grant sent federal troops to relieve the city.

Why was the Yankee occupation so bitterly resented in Louisiana? Shouldn’t everyone in Louisiana have celebrated abolition and the triumph of the universal principles of the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal” and meekly submitted to black majority rule? This is a peculiarly Yankee perspective of the American Revolution that was utterly foreign to the South. The Old South believed in classical republicanism, not classical liberalism. These men celebrated “liberty” in the sense that they saw themselves as the Roman paterfamilias of their plantations.

Louisianans believed that the sort of “liberty” and “equality” and “democracy” unleashed in their state during Reconstruction was utterly destructive and was a moral smokescreen calculated to dispossess them in their own lands while enriching Yankee carpetbags in the process.

Anonymous #wingnut #racist #homophobia archive.4plebs.org

[Picture of a D-Day soldier from Call of Duty WW2]

OK boys this is it! This is what you were trained for. Raised for. What your fathers did, your grandfathers did for you - and what you are know tasked to do for your duty to your country - your family - your countymen. Do you men really want your grandchildren to be white? Can you men, in your heart of hearts as Americans look yourselves in the mirror and say that you fucked up the chance to have your 7 year old grandson not shake his ass for a mob of faggots waving money among a cheering crowd of cocksuckers? Private Smith! Could you stand to look a half retarded nigger named LaQuarvarious in the eye and tell him that he can’t fuck that little boy in his ass with his AIDS dick? Well, if not, then just go ahead and burn the fucking flag. Surrender to the krauts and let your seeds live without the enrichment of third world disease and violence you pathetic maggots. Alright! DEPLOY! MG42 at 4 o’clock! By god men this is for the extinction of our race! If we don’t take that pillbox then whites could be a fucking majority in a century!

Dave Blount #wingnut #racist moonbattery.com

[From "Netflix Sanctifies Central Park Five"]

As George Orwell illustrated in 1984, progressives believe that it doesn’t matter what happens; it only matters what people think happened. To quote Orwell, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” The present is controlled by the sort of moonbats who run Netflix. This is bad news for the future.

People of the future will not know what happened. They will know what leftists want them to think happened, so as to advance the narrative that secures their power. A heinously false series on Netflix about the Central Park Five is a case in point.

In its vileness, the liberal media lauds Netflix’s When They See Us, which disgustingly portrays sociopaths as put-upon victims of America’s racist system. Ever digging for new lows, the New York Times actually ran a story praising the series under the headline, “The True Story of How a City in Fear Brutalized the Central Park Five.”

[...]

The attacks were explicitly racially motivated. Yet the attackers are portrayed as the victims of racism. Liberalism isn’t just wrong. It is precisely 180° opposite the truth. Since liberals control the past through the present, the future will see these vicious thugs as martyred saints, just like Trayvon Martin.

[...]

The Central Park Five confessed and served modest prison sentences. Nonetheless, the unspeakably loathsome Bill de Blasio actually paid the rapists a $41 million settlement in their suit against NYC for malicious prosecution, racial discrimination, and emotional distress. They became millionaires for what they did to Trisha Meili. That any decent person could support Democrats after learning this defies comprehension.

The evidence against the assailants was mountainous. No informed person doubts what really happened. So liberals simply lie.

It is not as if the public does not have access to the truth. In today’s Wall Street Journal, prosecutor Linda Fairstein details some of the many ways When They See Us deviates from what really happened. She was a supervisor of the team that prosecuted the Central Park Five. She describes Netflix’s propaganda as “so full of distortions and falsehoods as to be an outright fabrication.”

Random Person #racist #crackpot #wingnut youtube.com

RE: Kosovo triggers a domino effect in the Balkans

it's a battle royale ignore us who wins gets all the land most likely slavs due to slavs being a majority in the balkans

Slavs do have higher numbers but history has shown Slavs dominate when they have a vastly higher population. Even population or if Slavs are a bit less, they end up being occupied and ruled. Not sure if the Slavs outnumber everyone by enough, to dominate. Looking at history they need about a 20-1 ratio.

and who has dominated us ? We were the one who had lower population and economy compare to our invaders.

I know that is how you view the world as you balkanites are famous for being less rational and more emotional about things. This is merely an articulate of historical truths which seem to trigger you like a good soy boy leftist. This is about gene pools, not language religion or culture. The subject matter is Slavs. The world slave doesn't derive from the word Slav for no reason. Historically Slavs were slaves long before any of this religious nonsense even entered the equation in those regions. This is mostly about certain gene pools getting the upper hand on other gene pools.

Generally speaking, Slavs gain the upper hand when they VASTLY outnumber their neighbors. When they don't, they usually end up occupied, dominated and in many cases enslaved. There are a few thousand years of evidence behind this.

you base your assumption on racism not on "historical facts" more like "historical bias"

You really going to play the race card on this one? lol Yea bro, Russians have been known to have systematic racism holding them back for so long now lol Yes there is a such thing as historical bias. But that doesn't mean there also isn't something called historical fact.

Cody F. Walker #racist #crackpot #wingnut #conspiracy truth-they-are-hiding.blogspot.com

Notice also the peculiar geographic distribution of the disasters: predominantly Muslim countries, poor or otherwise troubled nations, people that somehow or other caused trouble to the ZOG or its big-nosed overlords. Notice that tsunamis, tornadoes or earthquakes seem to pass over Tel-Aviv, Jew York and similar, always hitting the central United States where white God-fearing folks who know what work is, try to live in peace.

But if you think that HAARP is the only doomsday weapon in the hands of ZOG and Mossad, think again. HAARP is an expensive and cumbersome operation, and the overflowing nuclear arsenals of USA and its Middle Eastern zionist lackey eventually came handy as a non-radioactive compact micro-nuke was developed by the Isreali nuclear plant in Dimona. Watch this evidence of one of the first uses of the micro-nuke. Remember the intrepid Australian journalist Joe Vialls whose work was a breakthrough where the micro-nukes are considered and whose mysterious death from a "heart attack" and subsequent disappearance of his Internet pages that unveiled the truth are the best proof that he hit a raw nerve.

Easy to deliver, untraceable and leaving no telltale radioactive residue, micro-nukes are widely used by Mossad and CIA for many False Flag ops, including the Bali bombing, WTC demolition and others. More significantly, increasingly powerful versions of the micro-nuke could have easily caused tectonic shifts necessary to end in the worst earthquakes known to man. Such as the one in Haiti. But again - you cannot hide the truth forever, and more and more astute clear-eyed folks become wise to the ways of the zionist murderers. Here is one, Tammy Obeidallah (not a Semetic person, even if her name may mislead), who was quick and intuitive enough to pick up the connection between the jewish "scientific experiments" and their disastrous use

A Modest Subscriber #racist justcommonsense-lostinamerica.blogspot.com

The second decision involved the Voting Rights Act of 1965. A good thing in 1965, Section 5 evolved into a tool for Blacks to achieve the reverse of voter equality; it has essentially become a tool for Black voting districts to commit massive Black voter fraud using such practices as barring state voting auditors
from monitoring the accuracy of votes in predominantly Black voting districts.

Perhaps the Supremes had taken a good look at massive voter fraud in Philadelphia, Cleveland, Cincinnati and Birmingham during last November's election. Incredibly, Obama had scored more votes than the total of eligible voters in the voter district. Most onerous, but apparently not embarrassing for Blacks, was the 115% of the vote Obama received in Black voter districts in Philadelphia.

Or perhaps it was the image of Black Panthers, wielding billy clubs, intimidating Whites from entering polling centers in Black districts. Under Section 5, it was the Federal government's responsibility to supervise fair elections, yet Obama's Attorney General, Eric Holder, chose not to prosecute these Black thugs, and in fact, covered up the investigation.

Maybe the folks on the court were taken aback by the Blacks who travelled about to seven states and cast a vote for Obama in all 7 states.

What the court essentially said is that the Federal government, under Section 5, had been given extraordinary power over state voting laws and had done a damn poor job of it. John Roberts himself wrote the decision and castigated Congress over their failure to heed an earlier Supreme Court warning that Section 5 was being abused and needed greater Congressional oversight.

While the Supreme Court probably didn't know how many dead people voted in the last election but, having sensed a hint of the "rotten", threw out Section 5, essentially telling Blacks voter equality laws were not meant to be used to commit voter fraud.

Squatting Slav TV #racist youtube.com

(the video transcripted here is a response to the music video of "Look At Me" by XXXTENTACION)

While it's no secret that the music industry, specifically the rap industry, have relied on generating profit through controversy and the glorification of crime, this video goes a step further and sets the precedent that violence and racism towards whites is not only encouraged, but also rewarded. The scenes in this video essentially normalized a very destructive, violent and racist behavior that much of the left has blamed on the right in recent times and is a classic example of the lunacy and hypocrisy of the people in the mainstream media.

As we've come to see in the recent times, video's such as these serve only one purpose and that's to divide and create tensions between people through their exploitation of racial baiting.

Strategically, the media moguls and elites always push these video's to the forefront of pop culture during times of heightened conflict and instability. The people making these video's are well aware of just how far their content can reach and know exactly that their negative social engineering is being used to crumble our culture and the young minds that consume this content as well.

R.G. Thatcher #racist #conspiracy #wingnut web.archive.org

THATCHER THUNDERS!

A Prophecy of Israel’s
20th Century Braveheart

ADOLF HITLER, the enigma of the age! A man shrouded in mystery! Who and what was he? Was he really a raging demonized maniac as portrayed below who destroyed whatever was good and right, or a conquering hero who helped his people stand up on their own two feet and destroy their oppressors?
Were the German people really blind to follow him? These are the questions this article WILL answer! The presentation of facts and analysis of those facts that follow WILL alter the political direction of Western Civilization! They will be profound and TRUE! They will establish Hitler as a Saint of God who was PROPHESIED to come in the Holy Bible. They will point a finger, not at Hitler, but at the Jews and their Communism and call them Satanic! This is heady powerful stuff. Can you handle it? Be strong and rejoice in this new Biblical view that is so needed at this desperate hour in Western civilization as many Gentile nations rage and build up their armies to destroy us. All ministers, preachers, and teachers who claim to acknowledge God’s Word, the Bible, WILL be held accountable for what they do with this priceless insight. Too many people in high positions have been guilty of calling good evil and evil good, some unwittingly due to mis-education and others knowingly because they ARE mis-educators and disinformation agents of the Communists and Jews (Edomites). But whether you are a Christian, agnostic, an atheist, or even a Jew, of the right or left politically, will you be able to accept the answer given? It will all depend on whether or not you are a person of TRUTH. Regretfully, too many people embrace whatever ideology or values which appear to be acceptable to their own peer group, not bothering to substantiate anything or even knowing how to. Your ability to come to grips with TRUTH will have to be your problem.

Although this article may very well be read by people of different races and creeds around the world, its primary audience will be found in Europe and the Western hemisphere, therefore they will be nominally Christian in that they supposedly take their beliefs from that book referred to as the Holy Bible. But only the TRUE Christian who TRULY seeks to upgrade his understanding of TRUTH as the Holy Bible professes to proclaim will be profoundly affected by the new insight presented here. Of course, there will be some of you nominal Christians who may actually, for the first time, sit down and READ the Holy Bible with more than just casual interest. And then perhaps in the not too distant future, our pacified inept nominally Christian society will be able to stand up and FIGHT the Beast and its allies that so much want to engulf us. THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS TIMELY AND REVEALING EXPOSE, FOR THE HOUR HAS COME!

Is there a third alternative to Communism or Capitalism? The Communists and Liberals will emphatically scream “NO!” And as proof they will point a finger at Hitler, 6,000,000 dead Jews (Edomites) and the destruction wreaked by World War II. The answer posed to the West by Hitler keeps resurrecting itself, but the Communists and Jews are constantly trying to keep entombed their ideological enemy. They want us to focus on just one concept – “BETTER RED THAN DEAD!” – and nothing else. We are constantly reminded by the Communists (but not the Russian Communists who are playing dead) that we of the West, as decadent Capitalists, have as a choice only Communism to rising Fascism as the lesser of two evils. They will also be quick to point out that any form of rising nationalism, of putting one’s country first, is merely fascism or neo-Nazism. The very thought of being tainted as a neo-Nazi usually triggers a conditioned response – you would probably quickly recoil in horror even as the fictional vampire recoils at the sight of the cross (i.e., the Swastika). We have been conditioned even as dogs were trained and conditioned in the famous Pavlovian experiments! The “Christian West” has been lowered before the specter of atheistic Communism.

Cannot the world remember that Hitler and the National Socialist movement were the archenemies of the Communists? We have been taught that Hitler’s “real” problem was “ANTI-SEMITISM” with which he infected his movement. And “ANTI-SEMITISM” the West equates repugnantly with the dreaded contagious AIDS through mind conditioning from “our” Jewish controlled communications media. We just cannot seem to remember that it was the Jews who started Communism in the first place – that most of the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks of the Communist revolution in Russia were Jewish. No, we cannot remember that because we WERE NEVER TAUGHT THAT! But what we ARE TAUGHT is that Hitler had a fixation disorder with regards to the Jews and used them as scapegoats to explain why Germany was having so many problems.

When are Christians going to read the Bible? If we are going to condemn Hitler for waging war against his enemies, we are going to have to condemn a lot of God’s servants who lead ancient Israel. (Read about God’s instructions to King Saul in 1 Samuel 15:2 & 3.) Should a soldier be condemned for doing his consecrated duty. Of course NOT! Only a criminal should be condemned to jail or death. As you will be shown “[Hitler] executed the justice of the Lord, and his judgments with Israel.” Can we as Christians not righteously judge this day between good and evil? Who is good and who is evil? The executioner and our soldiers who defend us OR the criminal and the enemy troops? CHOOSE!

Another word we have also been conditioned to use and respond to is the word “PREJUDICE”, and oh, how prejudiced we are against our OWN BLOOD RELATIONS – the German people – a CHRISTIAN folk, and how readily we defend NON-Christian aliens, the Jews! Truly we are a confused people who have drifted from our anchor, the HOLY BIBLE. And if I were your typical biased “Christian” who thinks all Jews are God’s Chosen, that Jesus Christ was one of the Jews as we know them today, and that Hitler was evil, I would NEVER have been able to figure out the references to Hitler in the Bible. What I came to understand through my own in-depth studies was that Adolf Hitler, contrary to political deception of the masses, was not the evil person he has been portrayed as. However, I did not study Hitler first. I studied the Jews and found out about their garbage books, the Talmud. And then I became, I figured, as incensed as Hitler became against the Jews. I, as a Christian, learned that the Talmud was not their name for the Old Testament of the Bible, but really the repulsive idiotic ramblings of various ancient Rabbis that makes null and void the Holy Bible. What I received from my studies was a definite case of RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION against these people who call themselves Jews. If you do not know what I am talking about, that is what a lot of deceived “Christians” come down with when they are confronted with a Nazi! You know, that exasperated angry feeling. But now my indignation was rightly directed against the Talmudic Jews (Edomites) who have developed Communism as their tool to gain control and enslave the world. Communism is but a by-product of Talmudic thought. It is the system that they, as the elite, will use to rule the masses (GOYIM). I WAS ALARMED!

Andrea Widburg #racist #sexist #wingnut americanthinker.com

Black Lives Matter reveals a generation of damaged straight, white women

The Black Lives Matter movement and the subsequent riots by Antifa, the Democrat party's domestic terrorist arm, have shown Americans what leftism is — an ugly combination of social and government coercion, racism, violence, and anti-Americanism. It's also revealed that the American left has been using American blacks as a vehicle for political power without any regard for actually improving black people's lives. Instead, the left destroys their communities and doubles down on damaging policies.

What few have pointed out, though, is the way BLM protests have revealed the damage that decades of leftist messaging have visited on straight, young, white women. To set the stage, here are some videos of the hysterical young white women who keep showing up in the front row of the Black Lives Matter movement, whether screaming at police, arguing with black people, rioting, or groveling:

White woman yelling at black officers

Those videos are just a fraction of the footage showing frenzied white women taking the lead in BLM. They are deeply involved in this movement and in the ugliest way possible — and therein lies a sad tale of the leftist takeover of straight, white women.

The root problem is that these women are receiving mixed messages that would make even the strongest person go crazy. Beginning in high school, or even earlier, they're told endlessly that they're both victim and oppressor.

These mixed messages make straight white girls distinct from other students. White boys are told they're evil, toxic oppressors of both women and minorities. It's an ugly message, but a consistent one. Boys lucky enough to have countervailing influences shake it off and become the men they should be. The boys who don't have better influences, interestingly enough, become feminized, even if they're not gay, as if trying to escape that awful toxic masculinity.

Meanwhile, everyone who is non-white and/or non-straight, whether male or female, or something else, is told that he, she, or it is a victim. White privilege, racism, homophobia, transgenderism, misogyny — all of them define how non-white and/or non-straight people suffer endlessly at the hands of straight whites.

And then there are the straight, white girls. On the one hand, they're...well, white and straight. That means they are evil oppressors who have benefited unfairly from white privilege. In the morality play that is leftism, they owe the world big-time. On the other hand, they're women, which means men have victimized them from time immemorial to the present.

That relationship with men is made more toxic by the fact that the young women are told simultaneously (a) that, as liberated women, they should be part of the hook-up culture and (b) that, as biological women, they're the victims of all men's rapacious, rapey sexuality. Given these mixed messages, it's no wonder that these confused young women willingly sleep with the guy at night and then accuse him of rape in the morning. Others avoid this confusion by embracing a trendy lesbianism.

These same women are also betrayed by the leftist culture's refusal to accept that motherhood is (a) biological destiny and (b) worthy insofar as creating and raising a human being does give meaning to life.

Once upon a time, women had no life choice other than motherhood. In a pre–free market, pre-industrial world, if one ignores the infinitesimally small number of wealthy women, any search for meaning in life was overwhelmed by the endless struggle to survive. Women didn't have time to compare their lives to men, especially because the men were also fighting for survival against the untamed forces of nature and other men.

With the industrial era and the development of free-market capitalism, things changed. In the West, ordinary people had time for leisure, contemplation, and the search for meaning.

That fundamental change led to the post-industrial, pre-modern cult of motherhood. Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi, who lived in Rome in the Second Century B.C., leaped into prominence. People in the 18th and 19th centuries loved that, when catty friends asked why Cornelia wasn't wearing jewels, she pointed to her sons and said, "These are my jewels."

Today's young women are told to focus on a career. In college, though, they take liberal arts classes that don't prepare them for anything useful but do reinforce their status as both victims and oppressors. They leave college, uneducated and unskilled, which leads them to unfulfilling jobs. At those jobs, they work hard while dating frantically. When they find the right man, they get pregnant, drop out of the job market, and resent their husbands' careers. They take all the energy that was meant for their professional success and pour it into hyper-motherhood and activism. (See those raging Portland moms above.)

None of this is healthy; it is, instead, tragic. Straight white women hate themselves for being white; hate their men for being oppressors; hate their meaningless careers; and, even though they love their children, they hate the seeming meaninglessness of motherhood. This profound cognitive dissonance has finally found its most disturbing outlet in their shrill, existential screams on the streets of the Black Lives Matter protests.

Hunter Wallace #wingnut #sexist #racist occidentaldissent.com

[From "The Rise of Hollywood"]

When did our age begin?

What distinguishes Modern America from Victorian America?

The transition between the two began in the 1910s, World War I was the rupture and was complete by the Roaring Twenties. The Lost Generation was the first Modern generation.
[…]
On one side of this divide, American culture maintained hierarchies in race, sex and gender. Victorian culture divided the sexes into separate spheres and races into superior and inferior races. On the other side of this divide, American culture became antiracist, sexually liberated and ultimately gender fluid. Women started voting and became the equals of men in the workplace and in sexuality.
[…]
On one side of this divide, women dress modestly and it is scandalous to find respectable women alone and drinking at bars. Smoking is taboo for women. Women try to stay out of the sunlight because pale skin is considered beautiful. On the other side of the divide, Modern women are smoking, cutting their hair short, drinking and listening to jazz at speakeasies, dressing less modestly, going out to experience nightlife and having sex with men they have no intention of marrying. Tanning becomes fashionable.
[…]
On one side of this divide, Americans sharply divide the world into civilized and savage and privilege the former over the latter. On the other side of the divide, the primitive is exalted and the civilized is denigrated.
[…]
Arguably, the biggest and most impactful change was the rise of the entertainment industry in Hollywood, the mass media and Jewish dominance in the creation of 20th century mass culture.
[…]
War had been an ennobling experience for the older generations who thought it would reinvigorate their values. World War I though wasn’t the Civil War or the Spanish-American War.

Jared van Niekerk #racist #sexist #wingnut amren.com

What whites are doing now is completely abnormal. What is the state of mind of a college admissions officer whose job is to practice discrimination against people who might as well be his own sons and daughters? Blacks who work in admissions behave normally; they advance the interests of people like themselves. Whites thwart the interests of people like themselves. This is an aberration of gigantic proportions but Prof. Farron almost seems not to notice.

The last few paragraphs are especially thought-provoking. The one thing that sets whites apart from all other races, is our limitless capacity for self-loathing. I could understand that unattractive white females or beta male whites would want to pull down other whites to their level by embracing feminism, Antifa or similar ideologies for losers. As Rush Limbaugh said: feminism was invented to give unattractive women access to the mainstream. I can also get that white loser beta males and bullied boys would embrace some leftist ideology that offered them the lie that everybody was equal in every way, but even attractive white women and successful white men seem to have been infected by this cancerous type of extreme altruism, the desire to see their own race annihilated.

Brett Stevens #wingnut #elitist #racist amerika.org

After years of denying it in the hopes of building a bigger coalition, the realist Right may have discovered that nationalism is the science of building nations around one ethnic group only, and through that, the idea that our “ethnostate” in America would be a WASP colony.

History tells us that America was founded by a group of English people with aid from some similarly-minded Scots, Dutch, German, and northern French individuals. When I last visited New England, those were the types of names on the oldest tombstones and on the oldest documents.

These people came over the sea as pioneers, arriving in an uncertain land where death lurked around every corner, that is if they did not die on the way over. They had to make or make do without any of the luxuries or infrastructure of Europe, fighting Indians and wild animals and new diseases.

As soon as they got things established, however, a flood of people began coming from Europe to take advantage of what others have made. This is how humans destroy everything: once the good people make it, the rest smother it.

Early America worked because the people were so similar; ethnic Western Europeans are genetically and culturally similar enough that they cluster as a single ethnic group. This allowed America to borrow a culture without even knowing that it was doing this.

Once the newcomers arrived, things got worse. In cities like Chicago and New York, political “machines” sprang up around the idea of buying votes with benefits, targeting new groups like the Irish and later, Italians, Jews, Slavs, and assorted Southern Europeans and South Americans.

These eventually conspired against the ethnic Western Europeans — called White Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASPs) to recognize their shared English cultural root in America — and by having large enough numbers to sway the vote, overthrew the WASP power structure in the 1960s.

Introvert (“Free Nathan Larson”) #wingnut #quack #conspiracy#racist #psycho incels.co

[Serious] Why you should NOT wear a mask, even if you are ugly, NOR take the vaccine

I have seen some incels saying “I like that everyone wears a mask, because then I can hide my ugly face”. This submissive mindset has to stop though.

Being ugly is not unacceptable. You have the right to exist. It is only females and cucks who want you to suffer, because they are sadists towards ugly men. They are the ones who do not want to see your face, and by then wearing a mask, you basically fulfill the desires of your oppressors. It is cucked.

Wearing a mask for protection, is foolish for three reasons:

1) Covid-19 is not real.
2) Even if Covid-19 was real, masks would still be useless. You still breathe, and this includes breathing in and out potential viruses. Wearing a mask instead only makes the air you breathe in contain a higher amout of carbon dioxide.
3) Even if masks worked, why would you want to protect other people from getting sick? Females would deserve to get sick for not giving me sex, and other men too, for being unhealthy cucks (healthy masculine men have a superior immune system).

Also, do not take the (((vaccine))). Not only because it is Jewish poison which gives recipients countless of “side effects”. I have also seen females saying: “I hope everyone takes the vaccine so I can go out and party again, teehee”. Taking the vaccine, is therefore cucked.

Instead of being hysterical sheeple, be healthy. My natural immune system is superior and would destroy any virus instantly. I do not need any vaccine. And to the people who want to force me to wear I mask, I say, like George Floyd, #ICantBreathe.

Dr Clyde Winters #racist africaresource.com

The ancient Celts and Vikings were Black people

The ancient Celts and Vikings were Black people.

The Celts were originally Black people. Ephorus (c. 405BC) claimed that the Celts were Blacks or Ethiopians(1)The Celts continued to be recognized as Blacks by Tacitus, who wrote about the Black Celts and Picts in 80 AD .(2)

The Celts on the mainland of Europe were called Iberians or Silures.(3)though the original Celts were Black, overtime their name was stolen by Europeans. Father O’Growney has discussed the history of the Celts. He makes it clear that the original Celts were the Iberians.(4)

The Iberians were probably conquered by the Ligurians.(5) It is suggested that the Ligurians may be represented by the modern Basque of Spain.(6) The Ligurians took the name Celt.

The Ligurians/Celts were conquered by the Gaulish speaking people. The Gauls conqered the Ligurians and pushed them into Spain. It was these Gauls who imposed their language on the Iberian and Ligurian Celts .

The Gauls were Belgians according to Father O’Growney. The Irish and Welsh are descendants of these Gauls.(7) These Gauls spoke Gaulish or Gaelic.(8)

The Germans conquered the Gaulish-Celts, and Gaulish disappeared around 4th Century AD.

All of the Black Celts in Britain were not erased by the Gauls.

This is supported by the Ivory Lady of York ,England. The reconstruction of the face of the Ivory Bangle Lady (c.350AD) indicates that she was African or Black.

This woman was rich and indicates the African type common to the Bristish Isles.She was highly respected by her white subjects.

There is genetic and linguistic evidence that proves that the Celts were Black or African people. An examination of the language spoke by the Basque has a Niger-Congo substratum. C.J.K. Cambell-Dunn has found a Niger-Congo substratum in Basque .(9)

Dr. Cambell-Dunn found that the Niger-Congo and Basque languages share personal pronouns, numerals and vocabulary items.

There is also genetic evidence linking the Basque and Niger-Congo speakers. Both groups share SRY10831.1, YAP, M2,M173(xR1a,R1b3), E3*-P2, E3b2-M81 . (10)This linguistic and genetic evidence supports the African origin of the Celts.

The original Danes or Vikings were Blacks . (11)This is made clear in the Oseberg 8th Century Vikings on the Norway Sledge carving of the Black seafarers that populated the region at this time. It is clear from this carving that the 8th Century Vikings were different from the Blond, big bodied folk of Viking legends.

Teutonic Knight #racist incels.co

Slavs have it worse than people in Zabbaleen

I'm tired of hearing how bad people in Zabbaleen have it when they all have wives and children.

They reproduced. They have jobs. They have children.

Meanwhile Slavs live in shitty apartment blocks with no chance to reproduce and drink alcohol and do suicide.

If you're born in Zabbaleen you will likely:
1) reproduce
2) die a natural death

If you're born as a Slavic man you will likely:
1) have no children
2) die from alcohol poisoning/suicide

mrdk_04 #racist kiwifarms.net

[paragraph breaks added for ease of reading]

Jesus fuck you people are evil. Fuck off with that suicide-shaming bullshit. It's not the fucking victim's fault.

I get really pissed off when people like Shrimpy refuse to lay any kind of responsiblity at the victim's feet.

As you mature and meet more people throughout life, you will come across absolute wastes of human space, the kind of people whose demise would only change the world for the better, whose only goal in life is to spread misery to others (subconsciously or not). Others you simply can't get along with, as they're not your cup of tea.

Normal people steel their minds and take precautions to prevent things from escalating in such situations.

When a grown women gets harassed or raped and she has the tendency to go out alone, wear high heels and talk to strangers easily, maybe she should adjust her behavior. Or would he say that's also victim-blaming?

!Segway into the Jewish Question!
When the Jewish people have a history of being persecuted by multiple nations and cultures across the globe

(Nazis, Commies, Spain, France, Austria, blamed for the black death, the crusades, blamed for Jesus' death, the Damascus affair, Palestines, the entire Middle East and even during apartheid-era South Africa) often being used as scapegoats for the current crisis, blamed for ancient history or just false causality between the sheer overrepresentation of Jews in the financial and intellectual upper class and their relatively small amount of people; perhaps they should look inward and take preventative measures to prevent such atrocities from happening.

Oh wait, they just turned the entire Middle East against them by colonising Palestine on the grounds of ancient history, to the point their constant paranoia is evident in every single Israeli newspaper and they have to ask the US to pay off Egypt just so they wouldn't have conflict on all fronts.

Even better: they recently enacted a nation-state law that is supposed to validate their existence as a country even more. At this point, no amount of goodwill is going to prevent the Jews from being expunged from their home country once more, they pissed of their neighbours far too much for that.

Alkso, take it from someone who's suicidal buddy. PEOPLE WHO CONSIDER ITOFTEN THINK THEY HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE YOU PIECE OF SHIT

What did Shrimps say again to that one suicidal person on Twitter? Oh yeah: "We can die together".

How nice of you to offer someone a viable alternative to suicide.

Truly, Shrimps is a good person, a TRUE and HONEST ally.

Croatian war veterans #racist wtnh.com

ZAGREB, Croatia (AP) — Wielding hammers, Croatian war veterans on Monday tore down signs written in the Serbian Cyrillic alphabet that were put up on official buildings to boost minority rights in the new EU nation.

Dozens of angry veterans pushed away police guarding the state buildings in Vukovar, an eastern town on the Danube that was heavily damaged by the Serb-led Yugoslav army during Croatia's 1991 war for independence. Thousands were killed in the conflict.

Vukovar has a sizable Serb minority and having official signs in both the Croatian Latin alphabet and Serbian Cyrillic are in line with the country's law on minority rights. Vukovar war veterans, however, say the Cyrillic signs insult Croatian war victims.

Police said that several people were detained and four policemen were slightly injured during the skirmishes with the demonstrators.

Croatian state TV reported that about 300 people gathered later on Monday demanding the release of the detained protesters.

Croatia's president and the government condemned the sign destruction as "chauvinist violence."

Croatia became the European Union's 28th member in July. But about two decades after the war, ethnic tensions between Croats and Serbs are still simmering, particularly in Vukovar.

Jean Cramer #racist apnews.com

MARYSVILLE, Mich. (AP) — A city council candidate in Michigan said Friday she has no plans to end her campaign after shocking a public forum when she said she wants to keep her community white “as much as possible.”

Jean Cramer made the comment Thursday in response to a question about diversity in Marysville, a city in St. Clair County, 55 miles (88 kilometers) northeast of Detroit. The Times Herald in Port Huron said she’s one of five candidates running for three council seats in November.

More than 90% of Marysville’s 9,700-person population is white.

During a follow-up interview Friday outside her Marysville home, Cramer doubled down on her statements. She said if there is a biracial marriage in their family, she could understand why her stance might upset her neighbors.

“Because those people don’t know the other side of it,” she said. “For whatever reason, I’ve heard, they love each other, whatever, but there’s also such a thing as remaining single. People don’t necessarily have to get married, and, if they love somebody, love them single. There’s nothing wrong with that.”

Cramer, 67, contends the bible backs her beliefs and asserts she doesn’t believe she is a racist, despite the condemnation of her views.

“As far as I know, as long as we’ve been here, Marysville has been a white community, a white city,” she said. ”. If we have seen a black person here and there, whatever, we’re not bothered by it. I’m not bothered by it.”

Cramer made her comments about keep Marysville as white as possible Thursday after the moderator asked candidates if the city should do more to attract foreign-born residents.

“Keep Marysville a white community as much as possible,” she replied. “White. Seriously. In other words, no foreign-born, no foreign people.”

The Times-Herald later asked Cramer if she wanted to clarify her remarks.

“Husband and wife need to be the same race. Same thing with kids,” she said. “That’s how it’s been from the beginning of, how can I say, when God created the heaven and the earth. He created Adam and Eve at the same time. But as far as me being against blacks, no I’m not.”

Melvin Thompson, etc. #racist hosted.ap.org

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) -- A tiny all-white Appalachian church in rural Kentucky has voted to ban interracial couples from joining its flock, pitting members against each other in an argument over race.

Members at the Gulnare Free Will Baptist Church voted Sunday on the resolution, which says the church "does not condone interracial marriage."

The church member who crafted the resolution, Melvin Thompson, said he is not racist and called the matter an "internal affair."

"I am not racist. I will tell you that. I am not prejudiced against any race of people, have never in my lifetime spoke evil" about a race, said Thompson, the church's former pastor who stepped down earlier this year. "That's what this is being portrayed as, but it is not."

Church secretary Dean Harville disagrees: He says the resolution came after his daughter visited the church this summer with her boyfriend from Africa.

Stella Harville and Ticha Chikuni - now her fiance - visited the church in June and Chikuni sang a song for the congregation. The two had visited the church before.

Dean Harville, the church's secretary, said he was counting the church offering after a service in early August when he was approached by Thompson, who told him Harville's daughter and her boyfriend were no longer allowed to sing at the church.

"If he's not racist, what is this?" Harville said of Thompson.

The vote by members last Sunday was 9-6, Harville said. It was taken after the service, which about 35 to 40 people attended. Harville said many people left or declined to vote.

The resolution says anyone is welcome to attend services, but interracial couples could not become members or be "used in worship services or other church functions."

Scott Wagner #racist philly.com

YORK, Pa. (AP) - A Pennsylvania state senator seeking next year's Republican nomination for governor says he doesn't plan to apologize for calling billionaire Democratic donor George Soros "a Hungarian Jew" with "a hatred for America."

Sen. Scott Wagner told the York Daily Record on Monday that "everybody's getting their knickers around their ankles over this and there's no reason for that."

Wagner's comments were recorded by an opposition tracker at a tomato festival in Pittston last week.

He says if Soros was Catholic, he'd have called him a Hungarian Catholic, and meant no offense by it. He says his comments weren't meant to be disrespectful or racist.

On Monday, the state Democratic Party described Wagner's comments as anti-Semitic.

Wagner says he has a long record of donating to the York Jewish Community Center.

Medieval Aryan #racist stormfront.org

Were the Blacks Culturally Enriched by Slavery?

Today is the Anniversary of the Confederate States of America (RIP), and I thought I could help it's memory live on by making a little discussion about it.

When a black man sees the Confederate Military Battle-Flag, the Stars 'n Bars, it automatically triggers violent thoughts of "hatred", or "racism".

To us Americans today, it seems obvious slavery was wrong. To an 18 year old boy raised on a Dixie plantation in the 1860's, it may not seem that way.
But think about it, what were the conditions really like in the 1860's?

Many blacks today are poor, violent, imprisoned, drugged, and just outright foolish.
Compare the average Dixie servant on a plantation to the modern negro.
The black slaves back then had interesting southern accents.
They worked hard and were quite healthy.
They were tall, strong, and extremely polite.
They were friendly.
They were humble.
They were cared for.
They were fed.
And they were given so much of an education, that our ancestors would even let them act as home-school teachers for their children often times.

Look at the average American negro today.
He dresses messy.
He treats women like dirt.
He kills for drugs.
He is unbelievably violent.
He is not very smart.
He sucks off the government 1 day, then screams F the police the next day.
He supports Obama but loves his guns.
He is smelly.
And he acts like a monkey.

The ONLY stories we are taught about Slavery are the few incidents when a mentally-plagued slave-owner would abuse his slave. We are not taught anything else in school, and our children will not be taught anything else about slavery in their school.

Pro-Black groups base everything they know about slavery on Harriet Tubman.
I would not be surprised if most of the slaves stayed with their former owners after the war, because they were given free food, free lodging, and free labor.
In fact, I could be the whitest man on the planet. And if I were poor or homeless in the 1860's, I think a black slave would still have better conditions than me.

Now, look at 1 more comparison. Compare the black slave to the average African male.
Read what I put about the conditions under slavery, and then read this about the Africans:
The Africans are poor and starving.
They cannot feed their children.
They need to kill and raid ships just to survive.
They are smelly.
They are very unclean.
They are plagued with AIDS, HIVS, and Ebola.
They are still running around with spears.
Their children are PAINFULLY pierced.
And they fight against their kinsmen on a daily basis.

These were the conditions of the African male during the beginning of Slavery in America, and they are still the conditions of many Africans today.

Very few Confederates were rich enough to own slaves, but the slaves who existed were more advanced than the modern African-American and African man today.
And the few blacks that are proud of their heritage and proud of how advanced their ancestors were in the 1800's have OUR ancestors to thank for it.

Happy Birthday, Dixie.

Total Imbecile #racist #crackpot incels.co

[Blackpill] Every race except slavs gets laid, its absurd

Just dont be slavic is THE theory to subscribe to in 2020

>B-but asians/curries are incel

Meanwhile gooks and curries are breeding like rats, the average person is asian

>B-but blacks are incel

Meanwhile NA blacks lead in terms of partner count and Africans Africans all have 10 kids each

>B-but WASPs/Nerdics are incel

Meanwhile they have more sex than all the other groups combined (-blacks) and dominate online dating


On the other hand every slavic country is seeing its population rapidly dropping while our white worshiping women are being exploited by western Chads, no wonder were so overrepresented on incel forums

Zionien #racist realjewnews.com

GOD ALMIGHTY is not an oppressor.

He gives man free will. Free will to choose. The Jews being a greedy/controlling lot have chosen that they would prefer to just “handle” things as they see fit and essentially play their own “g-d”, but there are consequences to poor decisions in life!

For the Jews to claim they are “g-d’s chosen” people when they have been hated for 2K+ years by most and have essentially created their own hell on earth is absurd.

They just want it both ways, but you cant serve mammon and GOD at the same time. It is becoming apparent that their time is of reckoning is once again, and finally close at hand!

GOD ALMIGHTY gave man free will, but the disobedient Jews of today’s arrogance just gets in the way and if they don’t accept Jesus Christ as their Messiah/Saviour - there WILL be Hell to pay!+

BummerDrummer #crackpot #racist incels.co

RE: [Blackpill] What does bummer think of Slavs?

@BummerDrummer

What is your opinion on slavic people. Are we white? Are we the niggers of Europe? There are few slav groups there are the central slavs like Polish, Slovak, Czech, etc.. There are the eastern slavs like Ukrainians, Russians, Belarussians, etc... There are the balkans with Serbs and Croats, etc..

Slavs aren't white JFL. Most need to be put right behind the urals where they came from. Mongoloid rape babies.

:cryfeels:

I believe certain slavics can exist in eastern europe but there are many that are practically asiatic. Slavs would, for a racially pure nation, need to have a very distinct racial identification science.

Don't lump us all with those eastern asiatic fakeslavs they are all mongols central slavs were never conquered by mongols everything west of central Poland area because I think they did conquer a bit of Poland though I don't remember but I don't think they ever got Czechs.

Western poles, Czechs and Slovenes aren't really nonwhites, nor are the Baltics (To some extent).

I’m pretty sure Slavs are actual Europeans. Maybe some Russians might have some Asian genes but Slavs are fucking white. It’s impossible to even tell the difference between a pole and German unless you look at dna

I divide slavs into 4 distinct groups. South slavs (Balkans+Hungary), West slavs (Poles, Czechs, Slovaks), central slavs (Belarussians, Romanians, Ukranians, Baltics) and east slavs (Russians, Permians, Tartars, Upper caucus)

West slavs and central slavs are 100% white usually. South slavs and east slavs are usually 50/50

btw im rly drunk and high so tell me if its making sense

Messager777 #racist arstechnica.com

(In RSTDT because of that first damn paragraph)

.
Since the 1960s, the liberals of the Blue States have been using US taxpayers money to buy votes from the Blacks, Hispanics, other minorities, poor folks, LGBTQs, etc, in order to keep themselves in power in Washington DC, against the conservatives of the Red States.
....... Eg generous welfare benefits for the poor and illegal immigrants(= mostly Hispanics), easy social welfare benefits for the Black welfare queens with 4 kids from 4 different Black bf's, Federal spousal benefits for same-sex couples, etc.

Hence, the States with the highest public debt are mostly liberal, eg California, New York and New Jersey. Most bankrupt cities are liberal.
....... The liberals-dominated US govt has an unsustainable debt of about US$20 trillion = will eventually go bankrupt.

P S - The Social Security Trust Fund is projected to be insolvent by 2033. The liberal Democrat President Lyndon Johnson began "robbing" the SSTF during the 1960s to fund the liberals' Vietnam War, which was earlier started by President Kennedy in support of the French colonialists.

SUH #racist incels.co

Would you rather be a Slav or Curry?

Curry:
positive stereotype of being polite and good at STEM

Likely high income in the west

Deformed face and black skin

Manlet

Can get an arranged marriage in hindustan, especially if youre mudslime(since mudslime indian girls get stoned for the slightest offence)

Extremely small communities of women fetishizing curries


Slav:
Deformed mongoloid, ME, or Indian(like me) face

Light features if lucky, many just end up having black eyes/brown hair

Manlet unless if you live around Montenegro

Reputation of being notoriously ugly compared to your women

Reputation of being poor and drunk, likely poor and drunk in the west and at home

Women are completely liberated, slav women would rather fuck SEAs than you

No known female communities that fetishize Slav men

Various Incels #racist incels.co

RE: Southern America is not only racist, it is xenophobic and hates slavs

(JustinSane)

I saw too much in fucking southern America. Everyone asks me where I'm from, what my accent is, and it kinda sucks because I know that Southerners hate slavs with such a passion that I never saw anywhere else. Why, Americans? What did we do to you to hate us so much? You basically hate every European with an accent, it sucks to live in hate.

You get treated that way because you're not a slav chad. Sub 8 slavs are hated everywhere. Their own women hate them, their are plenty of threads and videos on here to prove it. Slavs and Asians men have it the hardest anywhere in the world.

(SchrodingersDick)
I doubt anybody except the blacks hate you for being Slav. Blacks hate everyone who isn’t black. Also, It’s super common to ask someone where they’re from. It means nothing.

Black people aren't racist to everyone tbh.

They’re racist to anyone they accuse of racism, usually groups they’re jelly of and so they perceive every injustice as system racism. “If it rains on a black guys birthday, it’s racism” - Jared Taylor

(osman27)
I doubt they’d hate Bjørn from Oslo or Heinrich from Vienna. It’s a Slav thing. Brutal slavcel moment.

(Appetite4Destrction)
you can always fuck off back to your slav shithole, no one is forcing you to stay

jkhbsa #racist reddit.com

Liberals love to say it's the white people who don't live in a multicultural society who are the most racist since they don't have their lives enriched by the vibrant toilet cultures of the 3rd world, but as someone who lives in Toronto as most of you already know I can say that this is far from the case. I don't consider myself racist but a few of my friends are definitely white supremacists and they are products of shame and self loathing of their formative years where they grew up to worship the Outliers, to smoke weed and mourn the gr8 2pac shaker. Luckily I had a decent upbringing where I was frequently mocked for dipping my toes into the sewer, so living in Tha Toylet didn't do much damage.

Squatting Slav TV #fundie youtube.com

At present, reports indicate that some 400000 migrants are bottled up in Libya and that the detention centers holding these people have been overrun with robbery, rape and murder. Oddly enough, the mainstream media which insists on our tolerance towards hoards of "peaceful" African migrants pouring into Europe now admits that many of these people are in fact murderers and rapists.

BoBoLeHoe #racist niggermania.net

I thought Archie explained it well in his first paragraph. Like a lot of us here at NM, when we were young and optimistic we felt, regardless of skin color, everyone should be treated the same. You treat everyone with respect you get respect back. We allowed ourselves to believe that the white man keep niggers down with Jim Crow laws and shitty job opportunities and they were just as smart as everyone else. There was a time I was actually ashamed when my white neighbors and relatives spewed jokes about them.

So we opened ourselves to having personal experiences with "African-Americans" and over time, your enthusiasm for a color-blind utopia erodes away. You give them respect, they treat you like shit. They are not honest enough with themselves or other niggers, so they are never straight with you. Every nigger that enter our house, stole something often from my own kids. They burned down houses in my neighborhood so we got the fuck out.

You discover: They don't act like us. They don't think like us. They don't respect property. They don't know what friendship is or their concept of it is pretty fucking screwed. Like Archie, at some point your eyes are finally open and you join Niggermania. Call it therapy from Post-Traumatic Nigger Syndrome.

Teutonic Knight #racist incels.co

Roosh's entire "game" consisted of not being Slav in Eastern Europe

JFL at him writing entire books about how to get laid in Poland and Ukraine when all he could have wrote was:

"Just don't be Slavic in Slavlands."


He even ADMITTED it later on, these are his exact words:

"One good thing is if a Polish girl is really attracted to you, if she's physically attracted to you, it's going to be be way simpler to get her into bed. I used to think that Polish girls love me and they had sex with me just because of how I'm an amazing man but when it comes down to it's a little bit based on how I looked. They want to sleep with a man who doesn't look like a Polish man."

Abstrakt #racist stormfront.org

I'd say the entire privilege-unprivileged oppressor-oppressed model actually has a lot of validity if you used it to examine the subject of Jewish privilege. Although these leftist ideas are used in an anti-white context, I've always wondered if we could reappropriate these ideas and turn them on their heads, and use them against the very people who perpetuate them.

Because it's very true, the Jews do consolidate their own power through privileging their own kind in every walk of life. They treat Jew as superior to non-Jew, more deserving of power. Jewish privilege is a very real social system that dominates our society. Look at how disproportionately they occupy all the top positions of power. We whites would mostly be content with simply having and ruling over our own countries but the Jew is not content unless he rules the entire world, and all its ideological avenues of thinking.

So although I've hated Marxism for the longest time, with good reason I may add, maybe it'd be best to give the Jews a taste of their own medicine, and rather than rejecting this entire system of thought, use it against them. What are your thoughts on this?

Bro. Randy #fundie net-4-christ.org

As someone who is legitimately a Christian, you are also a new creature. The things of the world you once enjoyed should no longer be pleasurable to you. If you drank liquor, the Spirit of God should convict you of that. If you were one who spent time in dance clubs, and you are saved, the Spirit should have shown you that modern dancing is a sin! Likewise, when you were saved, the Spirit of God should show you that immodest apparel is a sin also. As a new creature, you have the individual soul liberty to do what you want to do, but what you want to do should reflect becoming a new creature through salvation.

So what should a modest lady avoid? Over the years, styles of dress have changed. Sadly, the styles of dress have become more revealing to the point where many women, whose character is far from harlotry, are dressed in ways which could easily cause a man to stumble into sin. Hollywood, the popular music culture and the fashion industry all encourage you to show off your body, but a Christian lady should know that her body is not her own.

1Cor 6:19-20 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.

As a Christian, you have been purchased already. Paul referred to himself as a servant. Literally, a bond-slave belonging to Christ. Therefore, since we are not our own, we belong to Christ and we should do the will of Christ. For a lady, dressing modestly is the will of Christ.

MEP Kristiina Ojuland #fundie news.err.ee

[Bolding in original]

Kristiina Ojuland, a former Foreign Minister of Estonia and former member of the European Parliament, voiced her disapproval of the European Commission’s migrant quota plan on her official Facebook page, by calling for a pan-European campaign against admitting any refugees in the EU.

In a post that was more reminiscent of a far-right extremist, than a former Vice President of the European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party (ALDE), Ojuland said that the “white race is threatened” by dark-skinned immigrants (Ojuland actually used an Estonian word “neeger” which is not officially considered offensive in Estonia, but nevertheless becoming socially unacceptable).

“Today yet again I see a fully able young Negro begging for money in Italy, from people who have worked hard to earn a lunch. I think that we should start a pan-European campaign to collect signatures to ensure that not a single so-called refugee gets across the Mediterranean. Enough of this nonsense!” Ojuland, the former high-ranking politician who for years campaigned Estonia to join the EU, wrote.

Her posting has so far gathered over 2,000 “likes”, 500 shares and 300 comments. While many people pointed out her offensive remarks and some called her racist, one would have thought that the former foreign minister would back down, but it didn't turn out to be so. Instead, Ojuland chose to rigorously defend her statement and even went offensive against the moderate commentators who asked for common sense.

“Stop using a word 'racist'! As a white person, I feel that the white race is threatened today! Are Estonians also so brain-washed now that they start talking some kind of politically correct bullshit?” Ojuland said.

Another reasonable commentator was told by former liberal MEP that by being a member of the European Union does not mean “accepting people who would squeeze Estonia's social system”. “Estonia needs to say clear no to Mediterranean migrants!” exclaimed Ojuland.

Frazier Glenn Miller #conspiracy timesofisrael.com

OlATHE, Kan. (AP) — The white supremacist who shot dead three people at two Jewish sites in Kansas City in 2014 told the court Friday that the killings were necessary, an argument the judge in the trial rejected as a defense.

Johnson County Judge Thomas Kelly Ryan said the “compelling necessity” defense could not be used in the guilt phase of the capital murder trial of Frazier Glenn Miller, 74, of Aurora, Missouri. Ryan didn’t rule out the possibility of letting Miller use the defense if he is convicted of the killings and jurors have to decide whether he will be sentenced to death.

Miller does not deny gunning down Dr. William Lewis Corporon, 69, and his 14-year-old grandson, Reat Griffin Underwood, at the Jewish Community Center in Overland Park, and Terri LaManno, 53, at the nearby Village Shalom care center on April 13, 2014. He said he felt it was his duty to kill Jewish people before he died; he didn’t know all three were Christians.

Miller spoke Friday for nearly an hour about his planned defense, explaining that the Declaration of Independence gave him the “right” to do what he did and insisting that “there is no legal way to save the white race.” His rambling presentation touched on Caitlyn Jenner, AIDS, Israel, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, British wartime leader Winston Churchill, the Rev. Billy Graham and a Jewish conspiracy he alleged was behind the sitcom “All in the Family.”

Ryan said there was no connection between the argument Miller made and the killings. In ruling from the bench, Ryan used guidance provided in the case of abortion opponent Scott Roeder, who unsuccessfully attempted to present a similar defense during his trial for killing late-term Kansas abortion provider Dr. George Tiller.

Miller, who is representing himself with defense attorneys available to help, responded to the decision by calling Ryan an “egg-sucking mule.” The hearing was marked with frequent outbursts and occasional anti-Semitic remarks from Miller, who at one point called himself a Nazi.

Ryan ruled against Miller on a series of motion, starting when he refused to step down from the case because he said there weren’t grounds for the request. Miller argued that Ryan was obstructing justice by not ruling quickly on motions or allowing him a computer with online access.

The next hearing is set for Aug. 5. The trial is scheduled to begin Aug. 17 with jury selection.

Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.; various Randroids #racist mises.org

Open Borders Are an Assault on Private Property

Whether we’re talking about illegal immigration from Mexico and Central America, or birthright citizenship, or the migrants coming from the Middle East and Africa, the subject of immigration has been in the news and widely discussed for months now. It is an issue fraught with potentially perilous consequences, so it is especially important for libertarians to understand it correctly.

This Mises Circle, which is devoted to a consideration of where we ought to go from here, seems like an opportune moment to take up this momentous question.

I should note at the outset that in searching for the correct answer to this vexing problem I do not seek to claim originality. To the contrary, I draw much of what follows from two of the people whose work is indispensable to a proper understanding of the free society: Murray N. Rothbard and Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

Some libertarians have assumed that the correct libertarian position on immigration must be “open borders,” or the completely unrestricted movement of people. Superficially, this appears correct: surely we believe in letting people go wherever they like!

But hold on a minute. Think about “freedom of speech,” another principle people associate with libertarians. Do we really believe in freedom of speech as an abstract principle? That would mean I have the right to yell all during a movie, or the right to disrupt a Church service, or the right to enter your home and shout obscenities at you.

What we believe in are private property rights. No one has “freedom of speech” on my property, since I set the rules, and in the last resort I can expel someone. He can say whatever he likes on his own property, and on the property of anyone who cares to listen to him, but not on mine.

The same principle holds for freedom of movement. Libertarians do not believe in any such principle in the abstract. I do not have the right to wander into your house, or into your gated community, or into Disneyworld, or onto your private beach, or onto Jay-Z’s private island. As with “freedom of speech,” private property is the relevant factor here. I can move onto any property I myself own or whose owner wishes to have me. I cannot simply go wherever I like.

Now if all the parcels of land in the whole world were privately owned, the solution to the so-called immigration problem would be evident. In fact, it might be more accurate to say that there would be no immigration problem in the first place. Everyone moving somewhere new would have to have the consent of the owner of that place.

When the state and its so-called public property enter the picture, though, things become murky, and it takes extra effort to uncover the proper libertarian position. I’d like to try to do that today.

Shortly before his death, Murray Rothbard published an article called “Nations by Consent: Decomposing the Nation State.” He had begun rethinking the assumption that libertarianism committed us to open borders.

He noted, for instance, the large number of ethnic Russians whom Stalin settled in Estonia. This was not done so that Baltic people could enjoy the fruits of diversity. It never is. It was done in an attempt to destroy an existing culture, and in the process to make a people more docile and less likely to cause problems for the Soviet empire.

Murray wondered: does libertarianism require me to support this, much less to celebrate it? Or might there be more to the immigration question after all?

And here Murray posed the problem just as I have: in a fully private-property society, people would have to be invited onto whatever property they traveled through or settled on.

If every piece of land in a country were owned by some person, group, or corporation, this would mean that no person could enter unless invited to enter and allowed to rent or purchase property. A totally privatized country would be as closed as the particular property owners desire. It seems clear, then, that the regime of open borders that exists de facto in the U.S. and Western Europe really amounts to a compulsory opening by the central state, the state in charge of all streets and public land areas, and does not genuinely reflect the wishes of the proprietors.

In the current situation, on the other hand, immigrants have access to public roads, public transportation, public buildings, and so on. Combine this with the state’s other curtailments of private property rights, and the result is artificial demographic shifts that would not occur in a free market. Property owners are forced to associate and do business with individuals they might otherwise avoid.

“Commercial property owners such as stores, hotels, and restaurants are no longer free to exclude or restrict access as they see fit,” writes Hans. “Employers can no longer hire or fire who they wish. In the housing market, landlords are no longer free to exclude unwanted tenants. Furthermore, restrictive covenants are compelled to accept members and actions in violation of their very own rules and regulations.”

Hans continues:

By admitting someone onto its territory, the state also permits this person to proceed on public roads and lands to every domestic resident’s doorsteps, to make use of all public facilities and services (such as hospitals and schools), and to access every commercial establishment, employment, and residential housing, protected by a multitude of nondiscrimination laws.

It is rather unfashionable to express concern for the rights of property owners, but whether the principle is popular or not, a transaction between two people should not occur unless both of those people want it to. This is the very core of libertarian principle.

In order to make sense of all this and reach the appropriate libertarian conclusion, we have to look more closely at what public property really is and who, if anyone, can be said to be its true owner. Hans has devoted some of his own work to precisely this question. There are two positions we must reject: that public property is owned by the government, or that public property is unowned, and is therefore comparable to land in the state of nature, before individual property titles to particular parcels of land have been established.

Certainly we cannot say public property is owned by the government, since government may not legitimately own anything. Government acquires its property by force, usually via the intermediary of taxation. A libertarian cannot accept that kind of property acquisition as morally legitimate, since it involves the initiation of force (the extraction of tax dollars) on innocent people. Hence government’s pretended property titles are illegitimate.

But neither can we say that public property is unowned. Property in the possession of a thief is not unowned, even if at the moment it does not happen to be held by the rightful owner. The same goes for so-called public property. It was purchased and developed by means of money seized from the taxpayers. They are the true owners.

(This, incidentally, was the correct way to approach de-socialization in the former communist regimes of eastern Europe. All those industries were the property of the people who had been looted to build them, and those people should have received shares in proportion to their contribution, to the extent it could have been determined.)

In an anarcho-capitalist world, with all property privately owned, “immigration” would be up to each individual property owner to decide. Right now, on the other hand, immigration decisions are made by a central authority, with the wishes of property owners completely disregarded. The correct way to proceed, therefore, is to decentralize decision-making on immigration to the lowest possible level, so that we approach ever more closely the proper libertarian position, in which individual property owners consent to the various movements of peoples.

Ralph Raico, our great libertarian historian, once wrote:

Free immigration would appear to be in a different category from other policy decisions, in that its consequences permanently and radically alter the very composition of the democratic political body that makes those decisions. In fact, the liberal order, where and to the degree that it exists, is the product of a highly complex cultural development. One wonders, for instance, what would become of the liberal society of Switzerland under a regime of “open borders.”

Switzerland is in fact an interesting example. Before the European Union got involved, the immigration policy of Switzerland approached the kind of system we are describing here. In Switzerland, localities decided on immigration, and immigrants or their employers had to pay to admit a prospective migrant. In this way, residents could better ensure that their communities would be populated by people who would add value and who would not stick them with the bill for a laundry list of “benefits.”

Obviously, in a pure open borders system, the Western welfare states would simply be overrun by foreigners seeking tax dollars. As libertarians, we should of course celebrate the demise of the welfare state. But to expect a sudden devotion to laissez faire to be the likely outcome of a collapse in the welfare state is to indulge in naïveté of an especially preposterous kind.

Can we conclude that an immigrant should be considered “invited” by the mere fact that he has been hired by an employer? No, says Hans, because the employer does not assume the full cost associated with his new employee. The employer partially externalizes the costs of that employee on the taxpaying public:

Equipped with a work permit, the immigrant is allowed to make free use of every public facility: roads, parks, hospitals, schools, and no landlord, businessman, or private associate is permitted to discriminate against him as regards housing, employment, accommodation, and association. That is, the immigrant comes invited with a substantial fringe benefits package paid for not (or only partially) by the immigrant employer (who allegedly has extended the invitation), but by other domestic proprietors as taxpayers who had no say in the invitation whatsoever.

These migrations, in short, are not market outcomes. They would not occur on a free market. What we are witnessing are examples of subsidized movement. Libertarians defending these mass migrations as if they were market phenomena are only helping to discredit and undermine the true free market.

Moreover, as Hans points out, the “free immigration” position is not analogous to free trade, as some libertarians have erroneously claimed. In the case of goods being traded from one place to another, there is always and necessarily a willing recipient. The same is not true for “free immigration.”

To be sure, it is fashionable in the US to laugh at words of caution about mass immigration. Why, people made predictions about previous waves of immigration, we’re told, and we all know those didn’t come true. Now for one thing, those waves were all followed by swift and substantial immigration reductions, during which time society adapted to these pre-welfare state population movements. There is virtually no prospect of any such reductions today. For another, it is a fallacy to claim that because some people incorrectly predicted a particular outcome at a particular time, therefore that outcome is impossible, and anyone issuing words of caution about it is a contemptible fool.

The fact is, politically enforced multiculturalism has an exceptionally poor track record. The twentieth century affords failure after predictable failure. Whether it’s Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union, or Pakistan and Bangladesh, or Malaysia and Singapore, or the countless places with ethnic and religious divides that have not yet been resolved to this day, the evidence suggests something rather different from the tale of universal brotherhood that is such a staple of leftist folklore.

No doubt some of the new arrivals will be perfectly decent people, despite the US government’s lack of interest in encouraging immigration among the skilled and capable. But some will not. The three great crime waves in US history – which began in 1850, 1900, and 1960 — coincided with periods of mass immigration.

Crime isn’t the only reason people may legitimately wish to resist mass immigration. If four million Americans showed up in Singapore, that country’s culture and society would be changed forever. And no, it is not true that libertarianism would in that case require the people of Singapore to shrug their shoulders and say it was nice having our society while it lasted but all good things must come to an end. No one in Singapore would want that outcome, and in a free society, they would actively prevent it.

In other words, it’s bad enough we have to be looted, spied on, and kicked around by the state. Should we also have to pay for the privilege of cultural destructionism, an outcome the vast majority of the state’s taxpaying subjects do not want and would actively prevent if they lived in a free society and were allowed to do so?

The very cultures that the incoming migrants are said to enrich us with could not have developed had they been constantly bombarded with waves of immigration by peoples of radically different cultures. So the multicultural argument doesn’t even make sense.

It is impossible to believe that the US or Europe will be a freer place after several more decades of uninterrupted mass immigration. Given the immigration patterns that the US and EU governments encourage, the long-term result will be to make the constituencies for continued government growth so large as to be practically unstoppable. Open-borders libertarians active at that time will scratch their heads and claim not to understand why their promotion of free markets is having so little success. Everybody else will know the answer.

Frank Borzellieri #racist vdare.com

The hypocrisy of white liberals over integration and the wonderful enrichment that mass immigration is supposed to bring is the gift that never stops giving. If there is one thing you can be absolutely sure of whenever you hear a white liberal espousing the vital importance of diversity, it is that the same person lives in a safe, lily-white community.

What was termed “white flight” in the 1950s and 1960s is a demographic fact of life and everyone knows it. No less an unwilling witness than the U.S. government has reported what everyone knows: when the non-white population of a community reaches between 10 and 20 percent, whites simply leave. Whites will not live in non-white neighborhoods in any meaningful percentage.[The Residential Preferences of Blacks and Whites: A Four-Metropolis Analysis, Housing Policy Debate, January 1997(PDF)]

I personally, as a libertarian, think all people—black, white, Hispanic, or Asian—should be allowed to live anywhere they want without being browbeaten or forced to live where they don’t want to. My problem is with white liberals who claim that “diversity is strength” but whose actions are very different when it comes to their own lives, their own homes, their own children and their own neighborhoods.

Pomidor Quixote #racist dailystormer.name

[From "UK: Radical Eugenicist Tory MP Proposes Street Combat Knife Crime Policy to Purge the Weak"]

I do not usually appreciate African culture, or feel enriched by it. I am often annoyed or disgusted by its bestial lack of depth and only rarely do I like anything about it.

But I need more of these knife fight videos.

They bring me joy.

The best way for me to get more of these videos is for all UK citizens to be taught street fighting unarmed knife defense combat skills.

Sir Christopher Chope agrees with me.

Daily Mail

Children should get ‘fitter’ so they are more able to repel the growing threat of knife attacks, an outspoken Tory MP told senior police officers today.

Sir Christopher Chope says more youngsters should be encouraged to try judo and taekwondo to avoid them feeling the need to carry a blade themselves.

The Brexiteer, who represents Christchurch in Dorset, suggested martial arts would help youngsters be ‘physically able to deal with the situation’ by either disarming a rival or fighting back.

[...]

Dave Thompson, Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police, told MPs today that the ‘best knife prevention technique is to run away, as fast as you can’.

Sir Christopher replied: ‘You do need to be fit to do that’.

I assume that Sir Christopher winked at someone as he spoke those last words.

It’s clear what he meant to say. Some people are more fit than others. None of us chose for things to be this way. This is how things are ordered in nature.

[Pictures of Hitler's quote "Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live", of "Pyramid of Capitalist System" and of a food chain]

Sir Christopher was tired of reading good news about the economy. He stood up and bravely declared it to be self-evident that Parliamentary authority be justified only through its adherence to one first principle. Parliament must strengthen the British people. To strengthen the collective spirit, each individual Briton must know mortal combat. To strengthen the national bloodline, the weak must be purged.

Sir Christopher’s radical politics of civilizational bloodsports seen through virality algorithms of mass surveillance footage are the logical extension of his ecofascist worldview. He believed in the genetically determined Neitzchean superman as the only valid social goal. He believed in himself, and in his own imperative to supply me with ever-increasing sacrifices of relatively athletic knife fight videos with moral consequences to jungle barbarians.

It does not matter what has to happen to society in order to produce the imagery.

The violence was fast-paced and tactical, but Sir Christopher knew that there could be more. To achieve his goals, society would have to be repurposed away from the production and consumption of consumer goods, and towards the attainment of the ideal human form through mass sacrificial combat.

Ecofascists such as Sir Christopher Chope believe that the three factors which conspire to determine a nation’s destiny were land, divine fortune, and blood nobility. Britain’s land mass was already sufficient to sustain many more Britons (if only they would breed in captivity!) and in any case could not be increased because there were no more wars.

A worldly man, Sir Christopher reasoned well that divine fortune was often indifferent to man’s interests and could not be surely appeased with any policy of Parliament.

For one revolutionary MP, it is racial destiny itself which must be mastered. Of all the factors incumbent upon the United Kingdom’s inevitable destiny, it is only this factor which could be improved upon through its subjugation to Parliamentary policy. Through mass conscription of the civilian population into a street fighter knife defense training program, Sir Christopher saw the most expedient path to the completion of German idealism, and the justification of previous acts of Parliament.

The Briton would be forced to confront knife-wielding barbarians, which had already been brought to roam their homeland through previous acts of Parliament, as a test of personal strength.

The Briton would share this experience of Victory with all other Britons through their culture, and recall the culling of the weaker Britons in their collective racial memory. This test of martial nature would define their national identity and embolden their will to exist and to struggle as a People. If the Briton were to achieve his perfect form, it would not matter to him if society were to collapse or if government were to fall into corruption and chaos.

Civilization was created once through collective spirit of will to power. As long as the spirit of greatness is within man, he can create it again, stronger.

Gregory Hood #racist amren.com

Kashmir: Suddenly the Left Understands ‘The Great Replacement’

Good news! It’s not a “conspiracy theory” anymore. The media finally understand that government policies affect demographics and that demography matters.

The Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir, known as Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), is the only majority-Muslim state in Hindu India. When India became independent in 1947, Article 370 of its constitution granted special rights to J&K so that it could maintain a Muslim majority.

On August 5, India revoked Article 370, to the dismay of most American media. Hindus, they warned, might take over!

Vox’s Alex Ward, for example, noted that Article 375 barred people outside the state from buying property, and was written to “prevent India’s majority-Hindu population from moving into Jammu and Kashmir and displacing the Muslims who live there.” Mr. Ward warned there could be “ethnic cleansing.” In another piece, Mr. Ward wrote that some believe “Hindus will flock to the region to push out the Muslims once and for all.”

Suggesting that loss of local population control could lead to “ethnic cleansing” sounds like an unhinged conspiracy theory. Mr. Ward himself, in a piece praising Pete Buttigieg’s plan to combat “white extremism,” said the idea “that white people are being replaced” is a “white nationalist” idea promoted by murderers such as the Christchurch shooter.

What’s wrong with revoking Article 370? Shouldn’t all Indians be able to buy property in their own country? Preventing “outsiders” from buying property sounds like restrictive covenants to me.

Mr. Ward or some “extremism expert” should tell the Muslim Kashmiris that there is no “us” or “them,” and that diversity will soon be their greatest strength.

Mr. Ward warns that Pakistan might intervene to maintain the status quo. Is he implying Muslims in Indian Kashmir might have dual loyalties and want the protection of a foreign country?

Even the New York Times now understands the great replacement:

Human rights activists said that the moves to change Kashmir’s status were only the first steps in a broader plan to erode Kashmir’s core rights and seed the area with non-Kashmiris, altering the demographics and eventually destroying its character.

The human rights group American Renaissance has made the same argument about the United States for decades.

The Washington Post also gets it: “Critics” reportedly say the Indian government’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party wants to “dilute the concentration of Muslims there and further its project to enshrine the Hindu identity of the nation.” The author also compared the “ethnic and religious undertones” to those in the West Bank, another area where media outlets mysteriously understand the importance of demographics.

The Atlantic worried that without the rule “dating back to colonial times” barring non-Kashmiris from settling, “the demographic balance of the state could shift—and with it, the idea that a vibrant democracy must take special efforts to protect the status of minority communities.”

Should the “status” of the white minority in South Africa be protected? No, said an Atlantic article in 2018. Worrying about the survival of white farmers is a “thinly veiled white supremacist cause.”

Bloomberg’s editorial board said India had made a “mistake.” It wasn’t making Kashmiris “feel like full citizens, in control of their lives and their destinies.” “Democracies as large and heterogeneous as India cannot escape internal tensions,” it said, “but the way to relieve such pressure is to decentralize power and give citizens a greater stake in their governance, as well as more control over local resources.”

That same day, Bloomberg argued for increased federal power in America. “The U.S. needs better intelligence-gathering and more effective preemptive action against domestic terrorists,” it said. Bloomberg also called for more gun control and an intensified fight against “white supremacy.”

When Kashmiris demonstrated against revocation of Article 370, India sent in troops and declared a curfew. Now the BBC even appears to be sympathetic to terrorism in the name of ethnic identity. In an article called “Inside Kashmir’s lockdown: ‘Even I will pick up a gun.’” it quotes without editorializing an angry young man who says of his toddler, “He’s too small now, but I will prepare him to pick up a gun too,” in order to fight what Kashmiris call “dictatorial power.” The article did not call for “gun control” or “tolerance.”

The Associated Press warned that “for many, India’s decision is a breach of trust and an attack on Kashmir’s identity.” Another AP story quoted a local man: “Maybe slowly our identity will disappear.” The AP did not call him “racist,” “far-right,” or “nativist.”

Two weeks ago, Farooq Abdullah, a member of the Indian parliament who represents Jammu and Kashmir, said he would “not allow any changes in the demography of the state.” He swore to resist “any attempt to dilute Jammu and Kashmir’s unique identity.” Imagine an American politician saying such a thing about the United States.

For white people, progressives repeat condescending slogans about the inevitability of population change.

“Migration is inevitable.”

“Borders are just arbitrary.”

“There’s no way but violence and oppression to stop the mixing of different people.”

Yet now we hear warnings about a government trying to “dilute” a native population. Amazing.

Kashmiris are bitter because they thought the Indian constitution guaranteed autonomy. White South Africans thought their land was safe because the constitution said it was. White Americans foolishly think the Constitution will protect their rights. History follows blood, not ink.

Kashmir just got its equivalent of the Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965. Unless it’s reversed, Kashmir will lose its identity. Still, at least reporters and human rights groups won’t call Kashmir “racist” for resisting.

Hecuba #sexist radicalhubarchives.wordpress.com

Julie Bindel is well known within malestream media and her capitulation to the trans issue which is totally anti-feminist and promotes male domination over all women, will be viewed by men and Male Supremacist System as another feminist finally accepting she is wrong and men are right. Malestream media and its virulent MRA followers will delight in saying to Feminists ‘look another Feminist Icon has capitulated to male domination and it won’t be long before all you women fall in line and kiss the feet of us superior males.’

Yes we all know women have to ‘make deals with the devil, (meaning we live within the Male Supremacist System) but there is a huge difference between deciding what is best for our well-being and security and blatantly reneging on one’s politics. Ms. Bindel has time and again declared she is a Radical Feminist but she has swiftly capitulated because her career is far more important than her politics.

Ms. Bindel is not a fool and she knows what happens when women capitulate to male demands, because it is men as usual who win and the woman will not be accorded any kudos or financial security. Capitulating to male oppressors only ensures the Male Supremacist System continues to wage war on any woman who dares to speak out against male domination over all women.

Ms. Bindel is no longer a feminist and she should say so rather than attempting to pander to a male in a frock. Note this male promotes virulent women-hating and male contempt for women.

Mr. Noname #fundie fanfiction.net

(=Another review for another homophobic fanfic of "The Loud House"=)

"They didn't choose this. They can't help it, they were born this way."

Simon Levay would beg to differ. Next time, please check your facts.

"Was the gay rights movement of the '60s for nothing?"

Pretty much. 'Gay rights' are a hoax. Not just Bible verses, but I've already given you people a list of things to look up yourselves to better understand the position that the author and I have taken: Christopher Doyle, ex-homosexuals in general, 4 myths about homosexuality debunked by natsumihanaki20 over on DeviantArt...I mean, you DO know how to use a search engine, right? Or a library?

*sigh* Michael Savage was right: Liberalism IS a mental illness.

Other than that, I'm going to end it right here. You detractors can debate this all you want, but the author has just as much right to share this story with the world as does anyone else. There are indeed a lot of grammar errors and plenty of poor sentence and paragraph structure, and maybe the Bible lessons DO seem rather overdone; "rubbed in our faces" and such. Fine, I get it. But all I'm saying is that if you don't like it, you can always find another story to read. Simple as that. I mean, nobody's FORCING you to read this one, correct?

You can't make us change our minds any more than we can make you change yours. Stalemate.

Thank you for understanding, and have a nice day. (walks away and gently closes the door behind)

...

Sorry about that, author. You might consider putting a warning notice at the beginning of one of the chapters. You could write something along the lines of: "This story/chapter contains strong anti-homosexuality sentiments (not to be confused with homophobia). If you don't like that, please don't read." Or in the main story description, if you can fit it in.

FashyDash and r/PussyPass mod team #fundie reddit.com

[OP of "Announcement : Pussy Pass Expansion"]

Fellow users of /r/PussyPass,

The introduction of this new project started out with a sore leg, and for this we apologize. As you all know, the entire world is going through a strange shift in balance; there are many forces of power acting upon our reality at any given time. At the end of the day the only thing a free being can hope for is a place to speak one’s mind, in accordance with rational thought.

Pussy Pass has always centered around the blatant double standards between the sexes, and rest assured this content is still welcome. With this expansion, we hope to not only broaden the type of content that points out these misgivings, we wish to also narrow down exactly where these problems arise. There is a systemic effort across the top levels of government around the world to undermine the basic nature of humanity. There is an agenda to dehumanize and decentralize the Family Unit.

Users of Pussy Pass have always leaned towards a certain rationality : realism. We have noticed the uprising of anti-male rhetoric, and we realize the harm it is doing. Traditional, realistic viewpoints are being overridden in favor of an egalitarian ideology that attempts in one generation to completely wipe out and replace tens of thousands of years of genetic memory. The most obvious of these attacks is the sudden disregard for Sex Realism.

While I will not be focusing on gender politics in this post, I will be calling attention to a bit of basic biology. Men and Women are fundamentally different, both sexually and mentally. We serve different biological functions. This is being ignored today. We have been put into a system that seeks to ignore our sexual hierarchy, trying ever so hard to make a square peg fit into a round hole. Feminism would have us believe that Men and Women are exactly alike, that we are capable of the same physical feats, that we should not be bogged down with traditional views. Moreover, feminism would teach that Men are the dogs of war, the senseless mutts who rape and pillage without mercy. Men are the misogynists, the oppressors, the evildoers. Men are the racists, the pedophiles, the murderers, the scoundrels. Men are the problem, the ones to get rid of. This is the way mainstream thought would have us believe. We would be castrated if they had their way. It is assumed that most of the subscribers to Pussy Pass are males, and for the women who are here we applaud you, for the only way you would have been here in the first place is if you had seen the truth yourself. Something is not right in the way we conduct our day to day interactions.

We at Pussy Pass have always known these notions to be false, and we have pointed them out. The Family Unit is a key part to a functioning, harmonious society. Numerous studies have shown the effects of good and bad parenting, the needs of children as they develop through emotional maturity. There is a basic biological algorithm for raising successful humans in this world : The Father, The Mother, and the obedient Children. This institution is under siege. There is a disruption in our society.

Disruption in society, what does that mean? Let us first examine what a society is, what it is comprised of. Traditional European Culture is rooted in mythology, not just the metaphors of old gods but the actual essence of their symbolism. There is a pattern that our people have adhered to for millennia, embedded in our subconscious. We are not created equal, there are differences inherent in us all. There is a natural hierarchy that has been established. We must take this conversation to the base level, the genetic level. Speaking biologically, Males and Females are different. This is obvious but overlooked. Too often are we bombarded by the notions that there is gender equality when we all know that this is a blatant ignorance of the truth. There is a completely different chemical makeup between the two, and this is natural.

Men have historically been known to be the warriors. Women have historically been known to be the nurturers. These roles are spurred by the chemicals Testosterone and Estrogen, respectively. There is a biological need to fulfill the functions we were born to do, and if we do not fulfill them then a complex is developed inside the psychology. Our bodies are telling us to do one thing while modern society is telling us to do something else. This is the source of the disruption.

Current thought places guilt on a Man for being masculine, instills rebellious spirits in Women, and casts the Children out to the wolves to have their consciousness be flooded with counter-intuitive propaganda. There is a growing trend to destroy the sanctity of marriage between a Man and a Woman, to teach that it is honorable for a Woman to abandon her natural role as Mother, and that it is acceptable for a Father to not tend to his household. If left unchecked this type of thinking will soon have us living in a disconnected reality, where Daddy is always gone, Mommy is always unhappy, and the Children are force fed bullshit by the State and the Mainstream Media.

Another topic of rational thought being suppressed is that of Race Realism. There is a distinction between people of all races. Simply by sight alone can one identify the separation in the races. This is the first step, to see a difference. The second step is to take into consideration the average known tendencies of the races. We all behave differently and in accordance to the race we stem from. Immediately one is branded a “racist, bigoted coward” if this topic is approached. This is ignorance, and a knee-jerk reaction by people too afraid or too dumb to see the truth. Racial Hatred has no place in a functioning society, indeed I find the hatred of anything to be especially demanding and difficult to procure. Racial Realism, on the other hand, is merely the scientific observation of all the peoples of the world. Why is it so wrong to point out empirical data? Each race has its own traditional culture, IQ Bell Curves, likes and dislikes, strengths and weaknesses. We here at Pussy Pass are not the racist bigots that others would think us to be. We only advocate for the truth, there is no assumption of supremacy. No one race is held in higher regard to others. We are all still human, we just act differently from each other. It is not racist to acknowledge this.

While this sub has mainly focused on one aspect of the problems I have listed, the new expansion project being carried out seeks to pinpoint the underlying mechanisms being used to illicit these problems. As stated before, all original PP content is still welcome. We know many users here have become outraged at this transition, and we sincerely apologize for the lack of communication. It is our hope to continue serving the reddit community, and we wish to actively engage each one of you in heartfelt, in-depth conversation about these issues. We invite you to stay and see where this project leads to, and even to contribute.

Thank You, /r/PussyPass mod team

john crawford #fundie foru.ms

(Noah was a Neanderthal, apparently)

[ Status quo theorizes that all humans descended from hominids who happened to live in Africa. You claim that only Africans descended from these hominds and that whites descended from European Neanderthals.]

I don't even use the word "hominid" when referring to people.

[But weren't you recently decrying the theory that all humans emerged from African hominids as "racist"?]

Yes. It is racist to call African people hominids.

[ And now you yourself are supporting a theory which gives all humans as descending from Mediterranean Neanderthals. Doesn't that make you racist as well?]

How? Neanderthals were real people who descended from Noah. They certainly weren't African hominids who shared a common ancestry with African monkeys and apes like neo-Darwinist race theorists would say of their ancestors.

Unnamed Austrian official #fundie nytimes.com

Gay Afghan Teenager Denied Asylum in Austria Because He Didn’t Fit Stereotype, Rights Group Says

BERLIN — A gay Afghan 18-year-old who was seeking asylum in Austria because he feared persecution in his country had his application denied because the authorities said he did not act like a stereotypical gay man, citing his walk, behavior and clothing, according to a Vienna-based organization that helps refugees.

In a case that illustrates the plight of many L.G.B.T. refugees coming to Europe, the organization, Queer Base, said the teenager, whom it did not identify, provided testimony at an asylum hearing this spring that he became aware of his sexuality when he was 12 and living in Afghanistan.

He migrated to Austria as a minor, according to the organization, which kept all other details of the teenager’s life and journey confidential at his request.

But after he applied for asylum, the document outlining the decision quoted an official as saying that the man’s claim that he was gay was not believable based on how he had acted while living in Austria.

“Neither your walk, nor your behavior nor your clothing give the slightest indication that you could be gay,” says the decision, which was more than 100 pages.

“They reported that you frequently got into fights with roommates,” it said. “You clearly have the potential to be aggressive, which would not be expected in a homosexual.”

lso said that the young man was not described as having many friends while in Austria. “Don’t homosexuals tend to be rather sociable?” it said.

Human Rights Watch said in its 2017 report on Afghanistan that the country’s law criminalizes consensual same-sex sexual conduct, and the report cited harassment, violence and detention of gay people by the police. The organization’s report this year noted that same-sex relations are punishable by five to 15 years in prison under a law that bans all sex between individuals not married to each other. Advocates for L.G.B.T. people operate largely underground out of fear of persecution, the organization said.

And while laws in places like Austria are much more gay-friendly, L.G.B.T. refugees often face challenges coming out, even if it would help their cases for seeking asylum, gay-rights experts say.

On the other hand, pretending to be gay or lesbian to increase one’s odds in the asylum process is relatively rare, those experts say. It’s more common for L.G.B.T. refugees to continue to hide their sexual identities and to lie about the reasons for seeking asylum, said Patrick Dörr, who runs Queer Refugees, a German state-sponsored program for L.G.B.T. refugees coming to Germany.

“Many of them have to overcome shame and stigma,” Marty Huber, a founder of Queer Base, said in an interview on Thursday.

The teenager was interviewed for his application in late April and the decision was handed down in early May. The decision gained international attention this week when a Vienna weekly newsmagazine, Falter, published details of his case.

Nina Horaczek, who wrote the initial article, published the key excerpts from the document that described the institution’s response to the teenager’s asylum request based on his sexual orientation.

The teenager continues to live in Austria as he appeals the decision. He has declined to be interviewed, Ms. Huber said.

Christoph Pölzl, a spokesman for the Austrian Interior Ministry, confirmed on Thursday that the decision was authentic. He said that the country’s Federal Immigration and Asylum agency had made decisions on about 120,000 asylum requests.

“In the asylum process, the asylum seeker must make his reason for flight credible,” he said. He declined to discuss the specific case of the Afghan teenager.

Migrants who flee their home countries for Europe face perilous and sometimes fatal journeys crossing by boat or over land, often at the hands of unscrupulous human traffickers.

The office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees said this month that more than 1,500 refugees and migrants had died trying to cross the Mediterranean Sea in the first seven months of 2018, with 850 deaths in June and July alone.

About 60,000 people have crossed the Mediterranean so far this year, around half as many as during the same period last year, the refugee agency said. Spain has become the primary destination, with more than 23,500 people arriving by sea, compared with around 18,500 in Italy and 16,000 in Greece, the agency said.

Most of the migrants who have ended up in Austria have traveled by land through the Balkans.

Austria has recently tightened its asylum requirements. One such change gives the government control over where refugees are placed, which can mean that L.G.B.T. people find themselves in conservative states where it is harder to integrate.

In June, Navid Jafartash, a gay refugee from Iraq, said on Austrian television that he was asked during an asylum application interview to explain what the colors on the rainbow flag stood for. When Mr. Jafartash, who lived with an Austrian partner at the time, was unable to do so, his asylum application was initially denied, he said in the television interview.

Activists say that L.G.B.T. refugees are especially vulnerable because in many cases they do not want to discuss their sexuality at an official hearing. Translators often act as more of an impediment than the Austrian officials because they come from the same community as the asylum seeker.

“Many of them have to overcome shame and stigma,” said Ms. Huber, whose organization is helping more than 400 L.G.B.T. refugees in Austria.

The asylum seekers also run into trouble in the asylum centers, where they are forced to live among their peers after they have outed themselves to an immigration official.

Sometimes refugees are not aware that their sexuality could help their case for asylum, Mr. Dörr said.

As for the decision in the Afghan teenager’s case, “it’s scandalous misconduct,” he said. “It just makes you shake your head.”

Monk of Failure #racist #crackpot incels.co

[LifeFuel] Normie looking Balkancel should go to Eastern Europe.

I'm using a normie looking balkan guy for chadfishing and has set the location "St Petersburg" Russia. He got 25 matches within 17 minutes on Badoo with 3 holes messaging him first. Balkancels should move to Eastern Europe. @anon

Note: Balkan is in southeast Europe not Eastern Europe and the people of Balkans despite being of slavic origin look good because they have Germanic and Mediterranean ancestry in them. They mog eastern Slavs.

2i269 #racist bnp.org.uk

[They call immigrants, foreigners or just people with a dark skin tone "enrichers"]

No enrichers should be allowed to stand for election, there should be no enrichers in lobbying firms and enrichers should not be allowed to vote in British elections. They can have a postal vote in their country of origin if they so choose - it’s not a question of denying them democracy, it’s a question of preserving our own.

3uxp #racist incels.co

Is there anything worse than...

being a slav ? Literally everyone mogs us we naturally have collapsed maxillas, norwooding at young age and no lower thirds, even if you never mouth breathe and have perfect posture as a slav you will still be fucked because of your slav genetics. Western men take our women like it's nothing most coal burners in countries like UK, Sweden, Norway are either Polish or Baltic immigrants. I doubt that JBW meme even works for us IT'S LEGIT over if you're a pure breed slav like me even a lefort3, hair transplant and other bullshit can't save us.

Average slav for reference:
http://humanphenotypes.net/basic/EastEuropid.html

vodkacel #racist #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[It's Over] Explanation to origin of slavpill (SUICIDEFUEL, SLAVS DO NOT ENTER)

I am Russiancel living in the Netherlands (aka land of tall chads). Here is my explanation to how slavpill originated:

1. Russia is known for very beautiful femoids and also for extremely ugly men. This is a brutal fact, I've been living there for 15 years, and 80% of men are below 4/10, due to facial ugliness (big potato noses, weird head shape, etc.).

2. USSR (before 1991) was a closed country, meaning foids had no choice, but to settle down with ugly males [thus ugly genes passed on to 21st generation]. Internet became available from 1995 to general population. My father, was one of the first people in his city to gain access to it and made a business out of it. All of his customers were foids asking to set up dating profiles in western dating sites. They paid my dad 10$ for 1 hour internet session (while average monthly engineer salary was 7$).

3. Due to Russian revolution, World War 1 and World War 2, most fit Russian men have died. My grandad, a birth - defect incel, managed to get a wife because he was the only man remaining in his village after the end of WW2; all the rest have not returned. There was a deficit of men, and only males remained were unfit for war (aka incels in today's terms). It was a social stigma for a female to be unmarried, so they married handicaps, ugly, etc.

4. Now due to Westernization, Russian femoids have access to foreign chads. Majority of men are single, or are socially abused by women (beta $$$). All males in my family are beta $$$, including my dad. The only reason he managed to marry (to my step mom) is because he has a high paying job in the Netherlands and promised her all fancy vacations and $$$. She openly admitted to me that she is a gold digger JFL. Many Dutch men are marrying Slav women. My step mom has over 20 Slav women friends, all married to Dutch chads via dating sites. It is OVER for Russian men. My condolences to all my slav brothercels.

Nabih Berri #racist #conspiracy jpost.com

The Lebanese Parliament speaker Nabih Berri apparently had no qualms about using an antisemitic slur in a meeting with Jewish American politician Eliot L. Engel.

The Lebanese daily Al-Jumhouriyya quoted Berri as saying during his meeting Engel, "How to Recognize a Jew? If you see a pregnant woman, get close to her and toss a piece of gold near her or at her feet. If the fetus jumps out from his mother's womb and grabs the gold, you know he is a Jew."
The meeting, which took place several days ago, was meant to focus on negotiations between Israel and Lebanon on demarcating the maritime border between the two countries, which would impact oil and gas drilling rights in the Mediterranean.

Al-Jumhouriyya reported in its article on May 29 that Berri made the comment when he as asked what he thinks is motivating Israel to soften its position and agree to demarcate the land and maritime borders simultaneously.

“The Israelis want the oil [in the Mediterranean] and want to produce the oil and gas found in the Palestinian waters,” Berri continued. “If they had companies capable of drilling and producing [the gas and oil themselves], they would have acted immediately, without delay. But they need [the help of] international companies, and the latter are apprehensive.

Belongs_to_the_nords #racist reddit.com

I look around me, and I see my family, my people. I live in a white pocket in the Midwest United States. I love this. I love these people. I don't ever want this to change, indeed, I want it to spread. But that isn't going to just... happen. We've all just sat idly by waiting for non-whites to adopt our way of living, not realizing that they just don't want to. The supreme arrogance of the western man was his assumption that the rewards he has reaped for himself can be shared with those who did not earn it. Freedom, the Republic, Westernism, our very way of life. But they don't want it. Arabs don't want a Secular Republic; that's why they always replace them with Theocratic Dictatorships. Africans can't handle the nation-state; that's why there's always famines and war. The European fails to see that the world not only doesn't want his values, but also wants him dead. To us who recognize this arrogance, it seems hopeless.

But it isn't. The European is the one who tamed the world. The Spaniard discovered a New World and spread their language and customs to all of South and Central America, and even parts of Asia. The Frenchmen revolted against an oppressive regime that used God as an excuse to oppress its own people. The Anglo-Saxon tamed the whole damn world in a never-ending quest for domination. The German fought against adversity from all sides to finally unite into a single state. The Italian helped to build the "west" as we know it, first with the Roman Empire, then as a hub of Christian influence. The Greek also helped to created this all, to establish the ideals of the west, and fought hard against foreign oppressors to regain freedom for their people. The Slav has made impressive conquests eastward and has endured centuries of misrule, either from genocidal Germans or Turks, (((Communists))), or just plain corrupt dictators, and has emerged with a staunch will to never falter again. The Magyar has not always been a European, but has joined the ranks through quality of character and ready embracement of everything that makes the west, "the west." The Norseman has struggled through adversity, and may well falter in times coming, but has always emerged strong, even against its all-conquering neighbors.

So, back to my first statement, about how I have to find faith in something other than God. After seeing our history, and how we compare to others, I can only come to the conclusion that the only thing I can put my faith in is, truly, the Iron Will of the European. Hard times are coming, but, as always, we will emerge victorious. I can only hope that, this time, we don't long to share our victory.

Hulk Hogan, brothers. May the European and the West never be broken.

ikester7579 #fundie boards.atlanticrecords.com

No, your not sorry for the sarcasm. And I more or less expected it. Because sarcasm is all that people can come up with to prove their point when they know their point really can't be proven.

<p>[snip a few lines]

<p>So why don't you tell us what you really think about God and all who follow him. Don't be modest, it's not very becomming of your style.

Royce E. Van Blaricome #fundie christiannews.net

Royce continues to insist that Jesus is named in the U.S. Constitution, but refuses to show where.

MarkSebree:
"Ever watch Bill O'Reilly when he gives the "Word of the Day"? If so, you'll be familiar with "Go look it up. If someone gives you the answers you don't learn anything and you don't remember it.""

No, I do not watch Bill O'Reilly, or any similar show. And I have looked it up. I have read through the US Constitution and its Amendments numerous times. Your claim is unsupported.

"Thank you for posting the website address for all to go to. I appreciate that. I actually went there and I appreciate you proving yourself wrong."

Actually, that site proves that you are the one that is wrong.

"It's right there on that very site you gave in black & white, MUCH APPRECIATED!!"

Then state the Article or Amendment, Section, and paragraph. You made the positive assertion, so you need to support it. Or do I need to post the entire text of the US Constitution to show that you are wrong? Nobody else sees what you claim is there.

You are the only one that is showing himself to be blind. Or more likely, dishonest.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
"No, I do not watch Bill O'Reilly, or any similar show. And I have looked it up. I have read through the US Constitution and its Amendments numerous times. Your claim is unsupported."

Well, maybe you should. Might learn something. And thanks for showing that you're just as blind as the other yahoo's on here who deny what's right there in black & white.

"Actually, that site proves that you are the one that is wrong."

Nope. Just proves your either outright lying, too ignorant to read, or so steeped in your own delusion and denial that you can't see what's right before your very eyes. But hey, take comfort. There have been many others who were in the same boat and ALL have been proven wrong as well. So you're not alone.

"Then state the Article or Amendment, Section, and paragraph. You made the positive assertion, so you need to support it. Or do I need to post the entire text of the US Constitution to show that you are wrong? Nobody else sees what you claim is there."

I don't need prove squat to you. As I've repeated said here, you people can't read black & white right before your eyes so cutting and pasting it here isn't gonna help you!

You wanna post the "entire Constitution" to show me I'm wrong - have at buddy. I look forward to seeing you prove yourself a Liar and deceptive in public. Just as you did with your false statement that nobody else sees it. Others most certainly have.

"You are the only one that is showing himself to be blind. Or more likely, dishonest."

Take a chainsaw to that Giant Sequoia Tree sticking outta your eye socket and maybe you'll see better and not be so blind.

MarkSebree:
Sorry, but I am not the one that is blind. Unlike you, I do not need talk show hosts to learn things. I can research the subject on my own. And despite your claims, I am extremely literate, honest, grounded in reality, not in denial, and I can easily see what is in front of me.

You have not proven me wrong. You have been committing logical fallacies right an left. You have been trying to shift the burden of proof, probably because you cannot support your claims. You have been engaging in ad hominems for the same reason. You have also engaged in a few more logical fallacies.

Unlike you, I am not delusional. I cannot see what is not there.

You have made the assertion that the USA Constitution contains multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in its text. That is a positive assertion, and you have been challenged to support your claims. You have not even been asked to post the exact text, just the location of it. You have refused to do so repeatedly. Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion is that you are a liar. You cannot support your claims, and thus you have been defeated.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
You're sorry, alright. And you are blind - spiritually-blind.

If you're so doggone literate, honest, and grounded in reality, then STOP telling lies and do the honest thing - cite the WHOLE Constitution right here so everyone can see you're lying!!

And now you lie openly. I never made the assertion that the USA Constitution contains 'multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in its text. Anyone can go back and see exactly what I said. Nice attempt at the typical Liberal tactic of Distraction & Diversion.

" You have refused to do so repeatedly. Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion is that you are a liar. You cannot support your claims, and thus you have been defeated."

ROTFLMBO!!!! So you think that's a reasonable conclusion? LOL When what I've said and maintained all along is 1) Go read the Constitution yourself, and 2) It would do me NO good whatsoever to actually copy & paste it here because it would still be in Black & White which you EVIDENTLY can NOT read!! LOL

I have supported my claims and you have NOT. Because you CAN'T!! The B&W text proves you wrong EVERY time!!!!!!!!! LOL

Defeated? Ha ha ha LOLOLOLOLOL It's easy to see who's been defeated. YOU and all the others who can't read and understand plain English! LOL

MarkSebree:
"You're sorry, alright. And you are blind - spiritually-blind."

Actually, I see very clearly. I removed the blinders that you wear decades ago.

"If you're so doggone literate, honest, and grounded in reality, then STOP telling lies and do the honest thing - cite the WHOLE Constitution right here so everyone can see you're lying!!"

I have not been telling any lies. And I have cited the entire Constitution and shown everyone that you have been lying.

"And now you lie openly. I never made the assertion that the USA Constitution contains 'multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in its text. Anyone can go back and see exactly what I said. Nice attempt at the typical Liberal tactic of Distraction & Diversion."

Actually, I have been telling the truth all along. It is usually a Conservative tactic to Distract and Divert the conversation, since you have been the one that has been engaging in that tactic, not me.

As far as when you claimed that the US Constitution contained multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in the text, you should really review your own posting history before making such a challenge. Its child's play to show that you are lying again.

[Reposts the conversation so far.]

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
[Calls each post dishonest, or lies, but offers no refutation.]

Mrs. Parunak #fundie ladiesagainstfeminism.com

[The Top Ten Reasons Modesty Gets a Yawn]

My family and I have had the privilege of hanging out with some unbelievably awesome single guys lately. A big reason I say they are so awesome is that they actually care about winning the battle with lust. Most men gave up long ago. Titus talks about Cretans whose “god is their belly.” In our culture, deity seems to have migrated several inches south.
But these guys have a problem, and it’s a problem that we have to own as their sisters in Christ. Everywhere they go, women are unbelievably unhelpful. Flaunting. Revealing. Immodest. Out in the world, we wouldn’t really expect anything else, but when it’s women in the Church, that’s a different story. Over and over, our friends have lamented that Christian women just don’t seem to understand what they’re doing to their brothers. I think that’s because no one is out there trying to teach them. And guess what, ladies, that’s OUR job. The Bible says that it’s up to women to teach other women how to be discreet and chaste (Titus 2:5).But so many women can’t muster much passion about this issue. It conflicts with other values, or it just isn’t on the radar screen. So, in honor of awesome guys everywhere, I would like to present my Top Ten Reasons Why Modesty Gets a Yawn in hopes that all of us ladies can wake up, start being “teachers of good things” and consider how to provoke other women to love their brothers by making the gathering of the saints a safer place for battle-weary soldiers of purity.
10. I’m too old to be a problem.
You’re never too old to be discreet and chaste. Just because you don’t look like a teenager doesn’t mean that you don’t still need to be careful. When you’re bending over in tight jeans, your crow’s feet don’t show anyway. And if your cleavage is spilling out of your neckline, it’s likely to be a challenge whether or not you have a few gray hairs.
Even if, for the sake of argument, you really are too old to ever cause anyone to struggle, you’re still not too old to set an example for the younger women who are naively exhibiting themselves. After all, if their mothers and grandmothers are doing it, why shouldn’t they?
9. I don’t have a body like a Victoria’s Secret model, so who would ever lust after me?
This one is similar to #10 and reveals a way in which most women don’t understand men. Women think that they have to have a perfect total package to provoke anyone to lust. Actually a man will feel a twinge of arousal from seeing anything that is hyper-accentuated and immodest about a female body–even if something else is less than perfect.
8. But my husband wants me to dress immodestly.
Usually, when husbands express this, it’s because one of two things is happening (sometimes both at the same time). Either you are not paying attention to satisfying his deep desire for visual stimuli when you are alone (and wives, when you’re alone, go ALL OUT!); or he’s a lust junkie who’s getting a buzz anywhere and everywhere he can and is annoyed that he isn’t getting the same buzz from you. A man that is fighting hard will not want you to be as inconsiderate and unloving as all the women he has to put up with all day. But a man who’s wallowing in other women’s immodesty will want to pull you down into the pit with him with absolutely no regard for how many men you cause to stumble along the way. If your husband doesn’t care if other men are lusting after you, it is a huge red flag that he is probably lusting after everyone else.
7. Are you saying that if a man is lusting after a woman, that it’s her fault?!
Nope. Not even close. Lust is a sin. And if a man is committing it, God holds him and him alone accountable. I’m not advocating the Islamic stereotype “blame the woman for her own rape” kind of mentality that says that men are not responsible for themselves in the presence of a beautiful woman.
But we can help our brothers. Being immodest is like throwing a party for a bunch of recovering alcoholics and deciding to have an open bar. If your guests got totally smashed it would, of course, be their fault, but no one is going to think for a minute that you really loved them or cared about their struggles.
6. But my husband never has any trouble at all with immodest women.
Apparently, there really are a few men out there who are totally oblivious. I don’t personally know any of them, but I’ve gotten enough comments from wives insisting that their husbands are in this category that I’m willing to acknowledge the possibility. However, just like I am taking your word for it that your husband has no difficulty, you might want to consider taking my word for it that a lot of other men do.
5. If Christians look like freaks no one will want to be a Christian.
People who don’t want to be Christians don’t want to because the Gospel sounds outlandish, or because they firmly believe something else, or even sometimes because they don’t understand their own sinfulness and what they need to be saved from. That “Christians are too weird” is just an excuse, as evidenced by the “Christians are no different from anyone else” excuse that we hear equally often. God frequently asks His people to do things that make us look weird (turning the other cheek, not lying, esteeming others as better than ourselves, for example). We need to be concerned with what’s right, not what’s normal.
4. But I want to dress like my friends.
Sure, but somebody has to be a leader. Imagine how much easier it would be for your friends to be considerate in their dress if you were already doing it.
3. I want to look cute and stylish.
This is a hard one. Probably every woman really wants to have everyone think she’s beautiful, but at what cost? Is following fashion so important that it’s worth placing a stumbling block in your brother’s path? Now someone’s going to jump in right about now and say that we can be cute and stylish and modest, and, of course, that’s lovely when we can achieve it. But modesty needs to be the first priority. So often it’s the other way around, and “cute and stylish” trumps modest. When we decide that our own sense of style matters more than helping men avoid lust, fundamentally, it is just selfishness on our part.
2. Guys won’t pay attention to me if I’m dressed in a sack.
Yeah, a lot of them probably won’t. But you have to ask yourself what kind of attention you really want. Are you looking for a godly husband or a long trail of panting, drooling puppies who will abandon you in a heartbeat just as soon as another piece of meat strolls by? Quality men want virtuous women. The problem is that the world is mostly populated by non-quality men, so virtuous women necessarily get less attention. This isn’t really a problem when you consider that drooling puppies make lousy husbands (assuming they ever quit playing video games long enough get around to marrying you). You’re wasting your time if you’re trying to appeal to them.
1. But I don’t see any men lusting after me!
Ha! Yes, there are a few creepy guys out there who ogle women openly, but 99.9% of the men out there are much more subtle. They know that it’s socially unacceptable to stare, so they don’t. In fact, most men will not look at your body when you are looking at them. If your attention is on them, they’ll look at your face, nod politely, play the gentlemen. But turn around to talk to your friends, and they’re watching you out of the corners of their eyes, and it is not your face they’re looking at this time. You have no idea how many surreptitious second (and third and fourth…) looks are being stolen. You also have no idea how many of your brothers in Christ are fighting hard not to take those second looks and are feeling really beaten up by how aware they are of your body.
Our brothers’ fight deserves much more than a yawn. Be modest yourself. Share the truth with your sisters. Let’s wake up and help each other out.

Peter Koenig #conspiracy globalresearch.ca

During last night’s celebration of the French National Holiday, around 11 PM, a speeding truck plowed into a crowd of thousands who were watching the fireworks along the Mediterranean Boulevard Anglais. The driver of the truck, was simultaneously and indiscriminately shooting into the crowd. He was able to run for 2 kilometers before being stopped by police, which instantly shot and killed him.

A horrendous terror attack, killing hordes of people, spreading pain, misery, fear and outrage in France, Europe – the world over.All indications signal the Big Script of yet another false flag; yet again in France.

The young truck-driver was identified as a 31-year-old Frenchman, resident of Nizza, with Tunisian origins. As in previous cases, ‘coincidence’ has it that his identity papers were found in the truck.

...

Why France? – Naturally, Hollande follows Washington’s orders. He is the most spineless puppet in Europe, making France the foremost EU vassal of America. And that in a post-Brexit ambiance, where according to several polls 70% – 80% of the French people are anti-EU and would vote for a Frexit, if they were given the chance to vote. This is a considerable increase since the Brexit referendum.

Washington needs a militarized Europe to be controlled by force, to impose its corporate financial rule, to push the TTIP down the throat of the Europeans, to make Europe the new and effective low-cost high-tech colony of the empire, and an unfailing buffer zone to Russia;

Cold War all over again. This time not so cold any more. WWIII is an imminent possibility, thanks to the EU vassals in Brussels giving NATO free reign to advance ruthlessly towards Moscow.

Surely, before long some Islamic ‘terror group’ will claim credit for the horror event. The usual. Let there be no doubt, as to who are the enemies of humanity – of ‘Western Humanity’ – the superior people, that is.

In the coming weeks it will be a piece of cake to slide this ‘law’ through the French Parliament as a permanent fixture in the French Constitution. That’s what Washington wants. That’s what Washington will get, thereby not only inciting but forcing other European nations to do likewise, putting their citizenry under military power.

How long will it take until We, the People, wake up and see the light?

Johnny Sparks #racist alternatehistory.com

Jews, Gypsies, Negroes and their bastard offsprings were the people that were effected by the Nuremberg Laws as non-Aryan, basically anyone who was not Indo-European.

All non-European people were seen as non-Aryan.

Japanese were seen as "honorary Aryan", and so was the Arab Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini and some Jews.

The hierarchy was simple the Germanic Ubermenschen were the master race and all other Europeans were Aryans beneath the Germanic people.

The Slavic Untermenschen myth was created by the Communists after the war, the Nazis never called Slavs "untermensch" and many fought on the Nazis side against the Jewish Bolsheviks as well as many Nazi documents showing Slavs as "Aryan". Slavs were considered Aryan by the Nazis and sexual relations between Germans and Slavs was not forbid.

Whilst the Nazis did use anti-Slavic propaganda to dehumanize the opponent in the war they were no racial hatred against the Slavs than any other non-Germanic groups such as Balts and Celts neither. Many websites and books repeat that the Nazis considered Slavs to be untermenschen and non-Aryan but this is not true. People often confuse 'Aryan' with 'master race' the Nazis used the term Aryan differently and when used as the master race it was only meant for Germanic people only.

Remember, the Slavs were supporting and being ruled by Communism/Bolshevism which was Jewish according to the Nazis and the Nazis wanted lebensraum "living space" in Eastern Europe so remember you can see why they called them uncultured. Hitler himself never really "hated" Slavs as to speak, he just hated the fact that Austria was being overruled in the Austro-Hungarian empire by the Czechs, Poles and other Slavs and called it the Slavicification of Austria which he did not want as he seen it as the de-Germanisation of Austria.

Hitler was first a German nationalist and was pan-German all the way but he also was a pan-European leader who did not have any racial hatred against Slavs and they were considered Aryan. In fact, before the war Hitler initially wanted Poland as an alliance against the Soviet Union. Also, after the invasion of Poland there was an "Aryan side" which was mostly of Poles and the German minority and others.

Of course one must remember many truths are often ignored about the Nazis since history is written by the victors.

Notary Public #racist atheistforums.org

Hitler was only killing the races that plague this world.
Gypsies, Jews, slavs, they are nothing but bad news.

Mass deportation and then separatism would have been a bit more humane, I agree.
But funny how people say Hitler is the bad guy when he was driving away all the pests that are currently infesting modern day Europe.

Now watch as all the bleeding heart liberals jump up and shout "MUH DIVERSITY" and "MUH TOLERANCE."
One day you will learn that there are some cultures and races that are truly scum.

I believe in nationalism. Each country for its own people, if gypsies and Jews didn't invade Germany, Hitler wouldn't have had to exterminate them.

Unnamed teacher #racist rawstory.com

A mother in Washington this week said she was outraged by an AP history lesson which extolled the virtues of slavery and accused Hillary Clinton of “setting back” the women’s rights movement.

Archaeologist and author Rachel Grant wrote on Twitter that she felt physically ill after her daughter brought home a 55-page packet titled “U.S. History Special Victims Unit,” which she described as a “non-white male hit list.”

“This is what her AP history teacher is including as part of the curriculum! Advanced US history with a sharp lesson in present day racism,” Grant explained.

According to the document, African-Americans “took full advantage” of welfare programs that were created by President Lyndon B. Johnson’s “Great Society.”

“The long-term results, however, have been devastating,” the document says. “Over three centuries of a strong work ethic, cohesive families, the thirst for education and Christian values as vital parts of the African-American heritage gave way to long-term dependence on the government and the erosion of the work ethic.”

Another section of the packet claims that “[t]he cause for women took steps backward when President Bill Clinton, notorious womanizer as Governor of AR, was publicly accused by Juanita Broderick, Kathleen Wiley, Paul Jones, Dolly Kyle, and others of rape and harassment.”

“First Lady Hillary Clinton joined her husband’s attack on the victim and she ‘stood by her man,’ thereby setting back some distance the cause of the women’s fight against exploitation,” the lesson adds.

It goes on to claim that “black lives did not matter so much” to President Barack Obama because he presided over a “disastrous economy for eight years.”

“I think I’m going to vomit,” Grant tweeted. “This man is teaching my daughter.”

Grant said that this was the second year that her daughter had been in the class of this AP history teacher but she never felt that she could complain about his politics until now.

“This isn’t politics. This is an agenda,” she said. “As an archaeologist w/a history minor I know how important history is. And this is all the non-white male US history some students will get,”

“I’ve made a copy and now I’m scanning the entire 55 page document. The principal and school board will hear about this,” Grant promised.

Besmir Aliaj #racist arwomen.net

Get a fuck out of hear and don't deform a history of Celt's. Origin of celts is from Albania . Celts are white people of white melamine and have nothing to do with native Americans. They have nothing to do with red heads or even Blondie's. Completely nothing. Saxons are red heads of Russian albinos origin they comed to Europe 900 years agow when celts hat at least alredy 3000 years on British isles. Saxons trye to hide the Truth because have nothing to do with european race . Saxons created a fake cultures some as Balkans and Hispanics. Hispanics do not exist they are just creation of primitive albinos

David Horowitz #racist rightwingwatch.org

Last week, conservative author David Horowitz appeared on “The Sam Malone Show” to promote his new book, “Big Agenda: President Trump’s Plan to Save America.”

Horowitz kicked off the interview by saying that “the Democrats are blinded by their hate, it is a party of hate, that’s all it runs on—hate and character assassination.”

After claiming that identity politics “is racist and anti-American,” Horowitz took issue with the term “people of color,” which he said is “not even English” and which he lambasted as “an ideological term to demonize white people.”

Democrats like to use the phrase, he said, because they belong to “a racist party” and seek to portray white people as “the oppressors, the bad guys.”

moviemeister76, Cmae #fundie dailykos.com

What’s it doing on Instagram? Did Heather Lind bring it up with his caretakers first?

moviemeister76: So sexual assault victims need permission from their perpetrators before they speak about what happened?
That is not what I said at all. Stop engaging in the Republican strategy of deliberate misstatement. The reason to go public is when a private confrontation is ineffective. We cannot make starting with a public accusations (not just sexual ones) the norm just because easy outlets like Instagram exist. Soon people with a vendetta or simple maliciousness for whatever reason will start making false public accusations. If that has ever happened to you, you would know that a denial is useless. It is very difficult, and most of the time impossible, to prove a negative. People just start gossiping and you, though even if innocent, pay the price. Even if you win (as an acquaintance of mine did, even receiving a 6-figure settlement), you will probably have to move to another community. This is why our system says that people are innocent until PROVEN guilty.

If Heather Lind had gone privately to the caretaker (as it appears that Bush is no longer able to directly speak for himself) and received an apology, would she or should she go public? What would be the motivation to do so? Keeping quiet out of fear or because of hush money is one polar wrong. Blaring an accusation from the housetops is another polar wrong.


moviemeister76: You know what? Don’t you EVER tell me how I should deal with accusing the man who raped me. EVER. Victims have the fucking right to handle it however we fucking see fit. All you are doing is showing that you’re more concerned about being accused of sexual assault than the women who are sexually assaulted.
You know nothing about me. You don’t even know if I am a man or a woman. I was careful to point out that I am not limiting my remarks to sexual assault, but negative public accusations of all kinds. However, I am so glad no one has ever falsely publicly accused you of anything, that you have had the luxury of supposing that all negative accusations of any nature are prima facie true.

Cmae: More passive aggressive mansplaining.
Question: Is it still mansplaining if a woman wrote it? More likely you are attempting ad hominem—trying to discredit the person rather than engage the argument itself.

Cmae: Passive aggressive female misogny works too.
And yet there is no misogyny, male or female, in my comment. All I have said is there should be a “regular order” to making accusations of any kind. Otherwise, people will start making accusations of all sorts, and I have been careful to say, those accusations do not necessarily have to be sexual in nature to do real harm. You are also very close to the next step, presumption of guilt, rather than presumption of innocence. One reason police shoot unarmed black people more often than white people is the problem of presumption of guilt. I am arguing for consistency of approach.

I agree that too often society winks at sexual misconduct. Even on Dkos, many of the ads objectify women and all we hear are excuses about how Kos does not control the ads. Running headlong toward the polar opposite of presumptive guilt would be counterproductive. This is a true slippery slope. Note the comments. A number of people are ready to speculate all sorts of things about Bush.


moviemeister76: Dear God. Why is it whenever someone wants to defend something they wrote that was misogynistic or racist as hell, they always give us a multi-paragraph screed?
So instead of a refutation, you offer a restatement of your original assertion without anything to back it up except “misogynist” is the ad hominem du jour.

Glory B. #racist realjewnews.com

America is completely Judaized and unable to take direct action against the Jewish oppressors. Jews dominate the media, the movies, the financial and educational systems, and the government, and pour their poisonous pro-Israel propaganda down the throats of American gentiles. Consider the practice of circumcision in America. The Jews created the system where every newborn boy, no matter what religion, is routinely circumcised at birth, IN THE HOSPITAL, unless the baby’s parents specify otherwise.

Most Christian parents are unaware that they have the right to protest, and therefore don’t say anything when doctors — mostly Jews — mutilate their sons’ sexual organs. The Jews have done this so that it is impossible to tell, when looking at a male’s penis, whether he is Jew or Christian. Unlike Europe, where Christians don’t circumcise their male babies, in America virtually ALL male babies are “cut.” This is the Jewish way of protecting their men, because when every male is circumcised, there’s no way of picking out the Jew-boys by pulling down their pants.

Yes, the Jews still have their bloody circumcision rituals, where the “mohel,” or cicumciser, cuts the infant Jew-baby’s penis, then licks the blood off the penis of the screaming boy-child. Kikes love to watch blood and suffering, even of their own kind. But it’s much more enjoyable for the Jews to watch Palestinians suffer and die, so they think nothing of murdering Palestinian nurses and doctors who are trying to help the wounded victims of Israeli aggression.

It’s about time that the gentile world realizes that the Jews are really sadists at heart and act against these Jewish criminals. All Jews are guilty of the murder of Jesus Christ, and they are intent on killing the non-Jews, to usher in the Jewish age of world rule. Christians it’s really up to you, whether you stay or if it’s the Jew!!!

Andafuture #racist reddit.com

Arab Blacks did enslave whites for centuries. The word "slave" comes from the word "slav." And yes we created beautiful civilizations afterward.

You ignore the fact that black Africans move HERE, all the time. Why are the moving here if we are so evil and racist and there is "institutionalized racism?" It's because the institutions actually favor functional black people, that's exactly what affirmative action is, an institutionalized policy of discriminating against white people. On average African Americans are the most prosperous of the entire African diaspora, including people in their native lands. You ignore the absolute tumult and violence that occurs when blacks get institutional power. See South Africa.
Baltimore city council https://goo.gl/images/1Dc7E9 Detroit city council https://goo.gl/images/13RUw2 Does that look like institutionalized racism to you? It's not, it's simply not.

I think you think that I have a high school education and I'm from the antebellum south. I'm not. I live in San Fransisco and I've attended the most far left universities you can find for more than a decade. I'm in academia. I am well acquainted with the idea of institutionalized racism, and I used to support this idea. I used to be an organizer against mass incarceration. I've probably read more bell hooks and Gloria Anzaldua than you have. I just don't think the facts support this worldview any longer. I looked for information that CHALLENGED my worldview, to see if it would stand up to challenge. The more I read, the more I realized it did not stand up to facts. You have the same opportunity and same responsibility.
"The richest black communities are more dangerous than the poorest white communities." Show proof" Let me google that for you real quick. https://www.google.com/search?q=The+richest+black+communities+are+more+dangerous+than+the+poorest+white+communities.%22&oq=The+richest+black+communities+are+more+dangerous+than+the+poorest+white+communities.%22+&aqs=chrome..69i57.2054j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Top two results http://newobserveronline.com/new-fbi-crime-figures-confirm-black-towns-dangerous-white-areas-safest/ https://cincinnatiisadump.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/crime-is-caused-by-poverty-enter-white-appalacha/

I don't have an ignorance of history, or social forces. Far from it. I cannot google everything for you. I've supplied you with a lot of counterfactual information, but the rest is up to you if you are actually interested in truth. I don't want to hurt people and I don't want to treat people unfairly. I think telling black people (and white people) that black people's dysfunctional behavior is because of racism does a disservice to everyone. Racism exists, but it doesn't explain what we are seeing here. That Japanese for instance were recently interned in our country, and they are achieving very well. That doesn't mean I endorse multi-culturalism, but you need to test your hypotheses against other examples. Black people do worse in "anti-racist" school systems for instance, look at Berkeley high, a hot bed of anti-racist intersectional and feminist pedagogy for decades. Black students have the greatest achievement gap here than anywhere in the nation. Why is it that when this ideology gets hold black people achieve less and white people are less safe? I know you think your ideology favors "justice," but the functional outcomes of this ideology are the opposite.

If you want to improve the world for everyone, start with facts, not fear of the truth. Start with curiosity and challenge your moral assumptions. I'm going to end this here.

Jane Moss #racist amren.com

Hispanics are not the only new group in my school. There is also a modest population of Muslim “refugees” from the Middle East. Muslim students are better behaved and more academically adept than the illegals from Central and South America, and generally stick to themselves. They are far from perfect, though. From time to time you can overhear them talking in sympathetic tones about Islamic Fundamentalists, and how white girls are fun to have sex with, but should never be considered as a possibility for a girlfriend or a wife.

Racial tensions are always high at my school, and sometimes they explode. Not too long ago, the school caught wind of a group of black students planning a food fight after they advertised the event on Snapchat. In response, security was beefed up and announcements were made warning students not to participate in it or face consequences. This made no difference whatsoever. The battle was kicked off by a black teenager who threw a full can of soda at a school police officer, knocking her out cold. He high-fived his black friends when she hit the floor.

As food began flying through the air in every direction and fist-fights broke out, the nearly 1,500 students in the cafeteria spilled out into the hallways and then out of the building. En route, a substitute teacher was knocked down and trampled, earning her a broken leg. In my wing of the building, the one white security guard and I sent the students who were trying to escape the violence — most of them white — into my classroom to hide. Order was only restored when the SWAT team arrived.

The “outrage culture” the school is steeped in makes everything worse. Black teenagers are well versed in their victimhood status, and accusations of “racism” are never ending. If you are older and white, students assume the worst of you and go out of their way to disrupt your classes and say outrageous things about white people in order to provoke you. They are always trying to make you lose your cool and say something inappropriate — all while the students have the camera on their phones at the ready, waiting to document you at your worst. They are well aware that all it takes is one slip up to end a career.

Even earnest liberals sometimes end up being victims of politically correct sensitivity. At another school I worked in, a principal presented district test scores broken down by race to the school staff. The difference between whites and blacks was enormous, and he told us that we needed to work together to come up with innovative strategies to close this achievement gap. He was passionate, motivated, and really believed that if we just taught the right way, we could close this “unfair” and “racist” difference in average test scores. A black staffer then got in touch with the local NAACP, accusing the principal of racism simply for having acknowledged the gap, and the well-meaning principal was forced into retirement.

Affirmative action and “diversity” are both enforced in two ways: 1) Officially, by the administration and its policies. 2) Informally, through violence and chaos — either threatened or carried out — by the black students. For example, administrators tell teachers that every social media post, photo, video, brochure, etc. tied to the school must have non-white students in it. But when something accidentally doesn’t, it isn’t necessarily those administrators who dole out the punishment.

Recently, the school newspaper had a cover photo of our lacrosse team. The students in the photograph were all white. Since there were no black students in the picture, the newspaper was dubbed “so white,” and blacks used this as an excuse to misbehave for the entire day. In class, if the artwork or historical period being studied involves lots of whites, the black students act up in outrage until the class becomes unteachable, thereby incentivizing you to focus on “black” topics as much as possible.

Worst of all is the leniency black students are given in all disciplinary measures. The administrators are desperate to even out the statistics that show how much more frequently blacks are suspended and expelled relative to whites — or even Hispanics. The result is that black students are often given slaps on the wrist for heinous acts, while whites face lengthy suspensions for minor infractions. Moreover, if you write-up a black student or call his parents, friends of the troublemaker, in what they see as an act of solidarity, sometimes punish you for having done this by bursting into your classroom and causing a scene.

Black children seemed to be trained to deny responsibility for their actions from a very early age, even when caught in the act. I’ve seen children as young as five yelling, “I di’n’t do nuffin” as they were being carted off to the principal’s office. They know nothing is expected of them and act accordingly. They are hypnotized by their phones, spending most of the day on them trying to become social media starlets. None of them ever bring their own school supplies, knowing they will get them for free from either the school or the naively generous white moms who donate them.

A concerted pushback against all of this madness could, in theory, be brought about by a group of experienced, dedicated teachers and staff. But racial preferences in hiring make creating such a group impossible. My district has minority recruiting fairs even as they make huge layoffs. They’ll take just about anyone if they are brown. The current assistant principal, for example, sometimes seems like she’s functionally illiterate — her assistants have to help her write official documents. But since she isn’t white, she receives nothing but praise and accolades to go with her hefty salary.

The small number of whites who attend my school have it the worst. They get attacked, robbed, and verbally berated on a regular basis by their “peers.” Many white students suffer from anxiety and self-esteem issues, leading to problems with drugs and self-harm. Given the anti-white bias in the teaching curriculum — which is steadily getting worse — it isn’t hard to understand why this is happening. Some parents manage to be oblivious to it all or turn a blind eye to it. More often, they’re just too poor to move to a district where their children aren’t subjected to this type of violence and degradation.

Our society denies the role of race in schools. All dissent is met with accusations of racism, public shunning, and the threat of financial ruin. But doing nothing means whites must condemn their own flesh and blood to the nightmare I’ve described — and we have a duty to protect the future for our children.

Karl Pomeroy #fundie theatlantic.com

The media attacks on Trump lie beyond the bounds of civility and decency. Destroying or attempting to destroy the reputation of a presidential candidate is not legitimate "vetting", it is uncalled-for vilification that undermines the electoral process.

The Trump University case is a civil case that Trump could settle out of court. It's probable the people just want his money. He chooses to go to court in order to keep people from suing him regularly, which settling out of court would encourage them to do.

Those who attack Trump's business record appear naive and ignorant about how entrepreneurs handle big transactions within the law. Have Trump's critics known any big money people personally? If so, these critics are hypocrites to pretend Trump may have done something fraudulent. I am of modest income, but there have been millionaires among my extended family, and what Trump does is not out of line. Lawsuits and business bankruptcies are common for people who deal at high levels.

If you want to sue a University, sue the University of California at Berkeley. They made students pay tuition for required classes that had no seats available, such that some had to stand in the hallway and miss the lecture. UCB failed to deliver. Indeed, people were jumping off the Campinele Tower---committing suicide right on campus---because they were cheated out of an education by that fraudulent University.

The Trump University prospectus offers inspiring Trump quotes. Probably this really is how Trump succeeded at real estate, and he was passing his techniques on to the students. Trump was, after all, a fan, follower and friend of Norman Vincent Peale, author of "The Power of Positive Thinking." If positive thinking sounds like generic advice, the student has missed the point.

People who criticize Trump unfairly must harbor a hidden desire to destroy humanity.

Karl Pomeroy
Quemado Institute

DogpillAbuser #racist incels.co

[JFL] Guy who had the banner ''White Lives Matter'' after 3 white kids got culturally enriched by a surgeon astronaut IQ genius immigrant got fired

He got fired from his job. The entire UK hates him. Europeans hate him. Sure there are small numbers that support him. But the general opinion is ''bad racist man''. But what I don't understand how can't people see through this bullshit. I hate jews.

Good. Those ALM guys can right piss off with their passive agressive bullshit. Imagine you try gathering awareness for a social issue and some dudes show up, tirning it into the absurd. I am sure if you try to safe a forest in danger people derailing the shit with non affected forests, plants or unrelated issues you would get angry too. "Why do you hate the other forests?!1111?" Noone said white lives don't matter, noone asked, also white people are not under collective scrutiny. Grow a spine and stop edgelarping. Where are those cases even comparative.

What social issues? Why are migrants chimping out in Sweden which is a non colonial country and probably the best one regarding on what it can offer to immigrants. Hmm yes because every crime white people commit against blacks is ''racially charged'' and every crime niggers do on whites I have to find out from non-mainstream sources and it's never proclaimed to be racially charged?

How about all you faggots who hate Europe so much go back to your mud houses in africa to pick berries and fuck camels?

He Was Right #racist youtube.com

[lyrics to "Prey for Europe"]

They pour in by the fucking millions
Through our borders and the cracks in the walls
They bring with them a vile spirit
A filthy desert cult of death
They sink their rotten teeth deep into our flesh
Their loathsome culture boroughs into our homeland
Their revolting ways of life imposed upon our people
And we sit back and watch them violate us all

Our instincts weakened by the leftist propaganda
Our love for our people given to those who hate us
We sit in the wastelands of our once prosperous nation
Yes, good goyim, wait and lay as the prey of Europe
Pray, good goyim
Pray, good goyim
Just keep praying till its your turn to die
Refugees welcome
I hope they fucking kill you all

Let these Jewish Muslims replace you in your homeland
Dont be Islamaphobic let them rape your wife & children
Not all the migrants are terrorists
Its all just a coincidence
Well just wait a few more hours
Till the next attack

Then well pray for Europe again
Its time to turn these tables show these Jews who the fuck we are
Sink the ships they send our way
No invader gone unslain
We will drown your migrant children
Desecrate your filthy prophet
Take another step onto our soil
You will be the prey of Europe
Prey for Europe
Migrant
Prey for yourself
Traitorous goyim politicians hang from the trees
Face the Mediterranean
Greet the refugees

Its time to turn these tables show these Jews who the fuck we are
Sink the ships they send our way
No invader gone unslain
We will drown your migrant children
Desecrate your filthy prophet
Take another step onto our soil
You will be the prey of Europe

Davidsrocks #fundie forums.christianity.com

From my perspective, the two men are saying 'Look God, we have found a way to enjoy the excitement and pleasure you invented for men and women without the down-side of rug-rats consuming our time and spending our money'. I see the life style as selfish in the extreme in that it consumes for its own enrichment the entire product of its life and passes nothing on to the next generation because there is none... As for the argument that 'What people do in the privacy of their bedroom is not my business' -- this tries to create a see-no-evil zone based on visibility. But aren’t all crimes and sins hidden as much as possible? Thieves come in the dark of night -- not at high noon. In conclusion, I see homosexuality as a selfish escape from human maturity. It is unhealthy and a financial burden on the society in which it exists.

kazan188 #racist stormfront.org

((Northernwulf)If anything it was aimed at Jews, The Untermench to the East didn't mean Slavs or else why were there SS divisions of 100% Slavs commanders and all, Look at a freind of Germany who was Russian named Andrei Vlasov who was former Red Army. It was never Slavs it was always Jews who are the Underman the undesirable race in Europe and the world.)

(kazan188)Were Jews regarded by most National Socialists as harmful parasites to expell or as subhumans? My feeling/understanding is that most National Socialists regarded them as harmful parasites, not as subhumans. Isn't the picture "the Nazis viewed us (Jews) as inferior creatures to be exterminated" just a Jewish invention? By acting that way, Jews abroad can/could depict their fellow Jews as martyrs of Nazism (essential to Zionist aims) without being forced to explain the harmful effects Jews had on the German people and why the Nazis wanted to get rid of them. To me, it seems that the Jewish achievements (real or invented) were never in the balance when the Nazis dealt with the Jewish question. The issue wasn't that Jews were inferior or not. The issue was that they were undeniably harmful to the Germans, and that's why the Nazis wanted them out of their new Reich and later (during the war) out of the entire German sphere of influence and vicinity (i.e. the surrounding countries as France, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Hungary, Poland, etc. because no lasting peace was possible with Jew-owned countries surrounding the Reich).

CertifiedRabbi #racist reddit.com

Makes perfect sense to me. I've always viewed ancient Egypt as being more of a Mediterranean or Southern Levant civilization than as an Arab or black civilization, especially since most of the great monuments and cities in ancient Egypt were located in Lower Egypt (which is actually in the northern half of Egypt because the Nile flows from South to North).
I was also always highly skeptical of the claims made by people like Zahi Hawass that modern Egyptians are the same people that built ancient Egypt. Observing how primitive and backwards modern Egyptians are just doesn't match up with the types of people that would build a civilization that was as sophisticated as ancient Egypt. Likewise, I'm so sick of modern Iraqis trying to lay claim to being the same people that built ancient Mesopotamia.
Arabs are garbage. It makes no sense that they'd erect so many advanced ancient civilizations. It's obvious that the original ancient inhabitants were invaded and mixed out of existence by more primitive people - just like how the modern Turks are also a dysgenic step backwards from the former Anatolian/Byzantine populations that they invaded.
I know that modern Egyptians don't like to think of themselves as being Arabs and I'm aware of the history of 20th century Arab nationalism, but it's so obvious that they are indeed Arabs just by looking at them and observing how they live and govern their societies. It's the same type of ineptitude and corruption that you see across the entire Arab world (with the exception of the oil-rich gulf states that hit the geographic lottery).
It seems like that entire region has served as a kind of arena for the various racial groups in neighboring regions to fight over. The people that dominated those regions during ancient times were probably nothing like the primitive and backwards Arab people that live there now. And no, I'm not saying that they were White, just lighter skinned and more Caucasian in demeanor than modern Arabs. And if modern civilization is anything to go by, then I wouldn't be surprised if the upper classes and ruling elite were especially lighter skinned than the darker populations that they ruled over, which is why the mummies have such unique Caucasian-esque DNA.
And that's also why I wouldn't rule out the presence of blacks in ancient Egypt. They probably served as slaves, just like blacks have been used by everyone who has come in contact with them. If that is indeed the case, then you're obviously not going to find black DNA in mummified ancient Egyptians because the mummies would have been part of the ruling elite.
And just to piss off the "we wuz kangz" types: This is additional proof that lighter-skin people create superior civilizations, and that lighter-skinned people almost always rule over darker-skinned people. These Egyptian mummies definitely weren't as White as the Ptolemaic Greeks and the Romans that ruled Egypt for several centuries, but they probably didn't look like Arabs either. And they certainly weren't negroids.

grondilu #sexist #racist #crackpot incels.co

[Blackpill] Does koinophilia explain the ricepill ?

In the Wikipedia article about koinophilia, there is an interesting paragraph that may help explaining the ricepill :

Koinophilia differs from the "like prefers like" mating pattern of assortative mating. If like preferred like, leucistic animals (such as white peacocks) would be sexually attracted to one another, and a leucistic subspecies would come into being. Koinophilia predicts that this is unlikely because leucistic animals are attracted to the average in the same way as are all the other members of its species. Since non-leucistic animals are not attracted by leucism, few leucistic individuals find mates, and leucistic lineages will rarely form.

So, could it be that Asian women prefer White men because the Asian race is so recent in anthropological terms that Asian women have not yet developed a sexual preference for Asian men ? They were having sex with them so far only because well, they didn't have a choice.

After all, according to current understanding of paleoanthropology, the Asian continent was conquered after the European continent. How long after ? I don't know, but who does, anyway ? I mean it's not like there is any certitude about these stuff.

This is the only explanation I have for an otherwise quite mysterious phenomenon.

Christian #fundie goodhousekeeping.com

The following quotes are excerpted from an article that appeared in Good Housekeeping on 11 January, 2017:

The homework assignment, titled $5.00 Date, required students, in this case girls, to go on a date with a male classmate. Below the assignment's description was a list of suggestions for girls from the boys, which encouraged girls to "dress appropriately," "be feminine and lady-like" and "if you think you're too fat, keep it to yourself."

The student showed her mother the assignment - all on a pink page and directed at 16/17-year-old girls:

"My 11th grade AP Honors student's homework: 'Go on a date!' with a boy. And follow his suggestions — don't correct his personal habits, don't waste his money and show him respect," she wrote. "Thanks for educating our kids, Utah Department of Education. We really appreciate your evidence-based misogyny."

This isn't completely one-sided, however. There's 6sheet for the boys as well. It icluded such time-tested $5 dinner date advice as this:

"At a restaurant, say what you're going to order so she will have a guide in ordering..."

Teutonic Knight #wingnut #crackpot incels.co

Is there such thing as celtpill?

We already discussed the slavpill a lot. What about Celts? Historically they got mogged a lot, Irish weren't even considered white for a long time, their languages dissappeared. I think Irish people are shorter on average than other Nordic whites. Currently, the descendants of Celtic people live in either extremely pro-EU pro-feminist Ireland, United Cuckdom or France (Britanny). These countries are not good for incels in 2019.

Are there any Celts here to clarify what their situation is like?

Personally I think Celts still mog me from Contae Mhaigh Eo to Breizh though.

BardaWolf #racist deviantart.com

I'm laughing hysterically as I post this, because at this very moment London is considering banning mopeds. Why are they doing this you ask? Well I'm glad you asked.

See this isn't down to accident statistics, or anything like that. Its because there has been a recent spate of thefts by men on mopeds. They pull up, steal cell phones and leave.
Now most of these men aren't native Brits. Rather they're first or second generation migrants, largely middle eastern. Nope, not the Chinese pulling off these thefts.
Gotta love that cultural enrichment.
Apparently the same police who have enough time to police mean words online can't be on the streets of London to prevent middle eastern men on mopeds from stealing phones, or heaven forbid prosecute them when they do. That's not a lie about policing online speech btw: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37076995

This of course is on the heels of a knife ban, which was written so vaguely a British man with a potato peeler was arrested. I fucking shit you not! Lol: https://dailycaller.com/2018/05/03/british-man-arrested-for-wielding-potato-peeler/
Leading to the "Bin the Knife" campaign: https://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/article/17425/Bin-a-knife Because you know all those knives going out on their own and stabbing people were a huge menace. Again, I need to comment on the vagueness of the wording, which means the law can include things like ordinary tools https://professional-troublemaker.com/2018/04/10/u-k-knife-control-gone-wild-stop-frisk-arrives-in-london-to-confiscate-your-pointy-things/
Of course us Americans know that if you want violence to go down its a good idea to politely ask criminals to surrender their weapons. In fact we had our own version of this program, gun buybacks, which as we all know work very well. Cough Cough....Camden NJ.....Cough Cough......Chicago IL. Not like people with a broken or damaged firearm would ever take advantage of a program like this in order to buy a new gun. Oh wait...

Guns of course have been mostly illegal in Britain for decades. Trust me though, its always the tool that should be banned. We should lengthen the list. I mean, why would you need a shovel or a bat, for instance? You planning on killing somebody you sick twisted fuck? What's wrong with you? And what about pipes. Stores shouldn't be allowed to sell those. They could hurt somebody. Close down Home Depot. Too many dangerous weapons that could fall into the hands of criminals

Oh God! I almost forgot about U-Haul! We don't want anymore trucks of peace! Can we ban them too!?

Aaron Sleazy #sexist blog.aaronsleazy.com

Imagine for a second that you’re an entitled fat bitch who has been told so often that she’s a little princess that she ended up believing it. Even if you’re not fat, your personality is very likely to be toxic. Now look around and you’ll find that there are a lot of Western women like that: entitled, unpleasant personality, and barely able to take care of their own life.

Alek Novy speaks of the “pussy cartel” if I recall correctly. Similarly to how OPEC controls a large part of the world’s oil supply, the pussy cartel controls how often men get laid. It’s an amusing metaphor, and there is some justification behind it. Women in the pussy cartel seem to think that because they are providing (selling?) access to a very desirable resource (sex), they can do whatever they want. (Just look at Saudi Arabia for a real-life comparison.) Since too many men only think with their little head, women believe they will get what they want anyway.

Your typical Western whore may very well think that she is a special snowflake and go on to bang a dozen dudes in her 20s. She thinks she can easily get a quality guy to marry her, should she ever decide to do so. More and more women realize that things seem to have changed, however. Some even speak of a “marriage strike”. It seems that word got out that Western whores aren’t really worth it. Many men don’t even want to date them anymore.

Here’s something to think about: go to a larger Western city, and count how many White male/Asian female (WMAF) pairings you see. Chances are that it’s not an insignificant number. Now, only the more desirable men are candidates for relationships to begin with, so for every white guy who entered a relationship with an Asian woman, some Western woman lost out on getting a stable and desirable partner. More and more white women will learn that they can no longer compete for white guys, so their prospects will be rather dismal.

It may just be my perception, but I certainly have the impression that WMAF pairings are getting more and more common. This now leads me to wonder how white women perceive this. Calling it an “Asia Shock” seems appropriate, in my opinion. Imagine this: Western women get raised to be spoilt brats and everything is fine and dandy because guys are seemingly willing to take their crap — until suddenly competition shows up that completely blows them out of the water. It’s not a pretty sight, and it’s not surprising that they are losing out as the women who “steal” their men are more attractive, smarter, and have infinitely more pleasant personalities. Seriously, why wouldn’t you trade a Western harpy for an Asian bombshell with brains who is a joy to have around?

It’s hilarious how Western women try to deal with their competition. Shaming guys is an old favorite. Then there is the old “patriarchy” canard, according to which Asian women are only nice because they are “oppressed” and if you date one, it not only means that you’re an oppressor, it also means that you are not “man enough” to date a Western whore. Dear Western women, if the choice is between a berating bitch and a woman who shows genuine appreciation for her partner, what do you think any guy with half a brain will do? Heck, plenty of guys who are immune to yellow fever rather abstain from sex and relationships altogether instead of getting involved with Western women. Whatever you think you are doing, Western women, I don’t think it’s working anymore.

Mandala #racist bnp.org.uk

The answer is simple - boycott these businesses. Although I do have very good friends who are Indian and Black, I tend to steer clear of ‘ethnic minorities’. One of the main reasons is to avoid being accused of being “racist” since I am quite openly a member of the BNP. If I remove myself from their enriching clutches, I cannot be labelled and judged by today’s politically correct police service.

Dave Blount #racist moonbattery.com

James Gifford, Saintly 70-Year-Old Victim of “Random” Black on White Violence

The Knockout Game, which enriches our more diverse neighborhoods with its robust ethnic multiculturalishness, has evidently claimed yet another victim. From Syracuse:

James Gifford, the 70-year-old man who was randomly attacked on Saturday, has died of his injuries, according to Syracuse Police. …

Romeo Williams, 18, has already been charged with assault in connection to the attack. Syracuse police and the Onondaga County District Attorney’s office will meet to decide what further charges to bring against Williams now that this is a homicide case.

Murder would be good for starters.

Print reports tend not to mention race unless it reflects well on liberal ideology — and it rarely does. Good thing we have video so we know why the attack occurred.

Otherwise random attacks on vulnerable whites by young blacks are sometimes called Polar Bear Hunting or the Knockout Game. Because of the media’s devotion to its politically correct narrative, it is difficult to determine the factor by which the frequency of these attacks has increased since the Passion of Saint Skittles. That propaganda campaign allowed the moonbats controlling the federal government and information establishment to whip low-information blacks into a homicidal frenzy by distorting and exploiting the justifiable homicide of Trayvon Martin.

Good thing incidents like this never make the national media, or others might get angry with substantially more justification.

Anonymous male, age 16 #fundie therebelution.com

Please don’t take modesty lightly. As your brother in Christ I value the relationship that I will have with my wife someday. When I am tempted because of you I lose a part of myself that I am trying to save for her. When I’m tempted because of you I become that much more accepting of the perversions in the world. When you remain pure and modest, my life is made so much easier. Instead of watching to ensure that I don’t sin I can focus on you as a person and fellow follower of Christ. I appreciate modesty more than you’ll ever know. Please, show respect of yourself and of me and be modest.

Dave Armstrong #fundie patheos.com

Truly obscene, crude, sexually-oriented language is beneath the standards of the Bible and the Catholic Church. The way some (many!) talk today was confined to locker rooms, bars, and bachelor parties when I was in college 35 years ago (and mostly just to men). And I think that was a good thing.
Oh, for sure we had Woodstock and George Carlin and R-rated movies and punk rock. But it wasn’t everywhere; in-your-face, mainstream, on TV, inane, and obscene hip hop songs blaring from the next car over at the gas station . . . People instinctively knew that it was to be confined and strictly limited. It was “behind closed doors.” It wasn’t the stuff of public articles and Thanksgiving dinners. People were scandalized in 1972 when they learned (through the notorious Watergate tapes) that President Nixon said “GD.” They really were! It wasn’t just prudes and 70-year-old ladies in purple tennis shoes who taught Sunday School. I’m old enough (58) to personally remember all that.

Society has regressed, as it has in so many other ways. Now women can swear like sailors or pimps (even publicly, even in Catholic circles!). “You’ve come a long way, baby.” People not only see nothing wrong with that, but wonder how anyone possibly could, as if objection to it were the strangest thing in the world and confined to the most ridiculous, antiquated, almost self-parodied “fundamentalists.” Thank God for Netflix, used DVDs, and many cable channels, so parents can still get good quality TV and movies for the family, amidst the nearly universal cultural decline of language.

I think it’s pathetic and disgraceful. Men have so looked up to women and admired them, traditionally, precisely because we feel they are on such a higher level (morally) than we are: the finer creatures. It’s why there is such a huge fuss made about Mother’s Day, while I always joke that Father’s Day is about on the level of Groundhog Day. “Mom, baseball, and apple pie”, etc. I have always sincerely believed this. If that’s now considered old-fashioned and quaint, so be it. Count me in. It used to be called “chivalry” till the radical feminists (not feminism per se) did all they could to mock and destroy it as a cultural norm. My wife and all the women I admire are up on the pedestal.

St. Paul stated that “there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal 3:28; RSV). It’s not an unequal scenario at all. We’re equals under God. I’m not advocating at all that there should be a double standard: with women held to a higher level. Let’s get that straight. A few people on Facebook, reading an early version of this post mistakenly thought that.

I’m not against women having freedom to act as they please, as men do. I’m disappointed when they become coarse and crude like so many men are. What a shame. Why in the world would women seek to emulate men’s worst characteristics? Even the Catholic / Christian / cultural notion that one doesn’t speak a certain way “in mixed company” is now lost. That was out of respect for women, in deference to them as finer creatures: not as crude and vulgar as men are. Now women join right in, and talk the same way themselves!

We all fall short in many ways. I’m not talking about the occasional slip, use of strong language in an outburst of passion, or in tragic situations, exclamations when we hit our head, etc., not even the relatively minor “swear words” (though obviously those should be tempered in any sort of professional or church setting), but rather, about brazen, consistent use, vulgarity, obscenity, sexual gutter language, and (above all) trying to rationalize it away as a non-issue, as if it is perfectly fine, and unfathomable that a Catholic organization would ever consider dismissing a writer on the grounds of persistent bad and insulting language.

My friend Patti Sheffield, on my Facebook page, outlined some of the biblical data regarding proper language:

"Ephesians 5:1-5 is pretty explicit on the conduct expected of Christians, and verse 4 specifically condemns “obscenity or silly or suggestive talk”, not just taking God’s name in vain. Ephesians 4:29 [“Let no evil talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for edifying, as fits the occasion, that it may impart grace to those who hear”], included in the list of rules for new Christians, explicitly forbade foul language. James also warned in his writing that we must learn to bridle our tongues. That means, simply put, have a filter. If someone is going to proclaim the Gospel (by being an apologist or a writer), then at least, have a filter."

"If we can’t be bothered to do that, we’re just conforming ourselves to the world instead of transforming it in Christ. And as Christ warns us in Matthew 12:36-37, we will be called to account for every careless word we make, and that will be a big factor in our final judgment. Why risk it for the sake of what some call humor?"

And let’s not forget the sage, stinging advice in the book of James:

"James 3:3-11 If we put bits into the mouths of horses that they may obey us, we guide their whole bodies. [4] Look at the ships also; though they are so great and are driven by strong winds, they are guided by a very small rudder wherever the will of the pilot directs. [5] So the tongue is a little member and boasts of great things. How great a forest is set ablaze by a small fire! [6] And the tongue is a fire. The tongue is an unrighteous world among our members, staining the whole body, setting on fire the cycle of nature, and set on fire by hell. [7] For every kind of beast and bird, of reptile and sea creature, can be tamed and has been tamed by humankind, [8] but no human being can tame the tongue — a restless evil, full of deadly poison. [9] With it we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse men, who are made in the likeness of God. [10] From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brethren, this ought not to be so. [11] Does a spring pour forth from the same opening fresh water and brackish?"

Again, I’m not saying that women are held to one ethical standard and men to another: the old ridiculous double standard. No! It is us admiring women because they voluntarily chose to be more moral than we knew ourselves to be. It has to do also with men and women being fundamentally different in the first place. Ideally, we look up to each other, because of the complementarity that God designed.

The Catholic tradition is what taught the beauty and necessity of waiting till marriage, while the sexual revolution has brought us wonderful things like ubiquitous pornography. That really raises women’s stature in the eyes of men, doesn’t it? We need to understand what chivalry is in the first place and what has gotten our society into the sad, pathetic state it is now, after 50 years of wonderful sexual liberation. Everyone’s ecstatically happy, aren’t they? Families and marriages are better than they have ever been. Not! How’s the culture doing on marriage and treatment of women, post sexual revolution? How well has that pitiful social experiment / wholesale rebellion against sane, sensible tradition worked out?

As long as women continue to give out the “benefits” without demanding the commitment, we’ll be in the mess we’re in. That’s just about the root of it: caving into mens’ sinful sexual desires and emotional manipulations. It’s what has caused illegitimacy rates in the inner cities to rise to an astounding 80%. That and the broken home that usually results are some of the leading sociological indicators (my major) of poverty and a life of misery.

In practice, traditionally, women have been more moral sexually than men have been. Whether that was due to the double standard or the fear of pregnancy or the social stigma, or actually understanding the goodness of waiting till marriage, or various combinations of the above, it is a demonstrable fact. That has now mostly broken down.

And in practice, traditionally, women controlled their language much better than men did. All I’m saying was that men admired that. You admire what someone does better than yourself. I’m not in any way, shape, or form saying that men get a bigger pass and have less responsibility to follow Scripture and the Church. I’m simply describing the usual sinful reality of it. It’s the distinction between prescription (the should and ought) and description (the actual fact).

I still think women have the edge in sanctity: in practice. But radical feminism and unisexism are working very hard to make sure that women are equally as sinful as men in all areas. For the most radical feminists, their working philosophy has been to “hate men and to simultaneously do everything possible to be exactly like them in every way.” Sort of the “identifying with the oppressor” routine.

Language is one of these areas. Premarital sex is another. This is my point. There used to be a pronounced difference [no pun intended!] in how women talked. So we men admired them for that. Now that distinction is rapidly diminishing, and I think it’s a shame, because it means that women are relatively more sinful (as a generalization) in this area than they used to be, and that’s a very sad thing and a loss of yet another element of Catholic tradition and the traditional relationship between the sexes.

Feminism (mainstream, not radical) actually gives credence to my argument here, by its own rhetoric and self-understanding. If women are not higher creatures than men in some sense, how is it that feminists are (and indeed the thrust of the secular culture also is) always urging men to be more like women: more sensitive, nurturing, and communicative in particular? This presupposes that women have these traits that men desperately need to learn and emulate. Now how could that be if women were not indeed “higher” than men, for whatever reason, in those respects? And that leads back to my point. We look up to y’all because you really do have characteristics that we lack.

It can work both ways, though. My wife often complains about groups of women going right into gossip and complaining about their husbands. This is a major fault in women, and one where they can learn from the generally better example of men. Men almost never run down their wives in public; hardly even in private, one-to-one. They instinctively regard that as low-class, cheap, utterly inappropriate, and a bad reflection on them (since they chose to marry this woman). It’s just not done. So this is an instance where women could be raised up a bit by imitating what men almost always do. Both genders have their characteristic besetting sins. I would say that the biggest ones are lust for men and nagging / complaining for women.

But this is another instance of women themselves thinking they are superior to men. If they didn’t, the many women who do this wouldn’t sit there for hours gossiping about their husbands and assuming they are dolts who “don’t get it” and who don’t grasp the simplest things, like being able to openly, honestly express their feelings (like most women do), and often assume at the same time naively, foolishly assume that they are perfectly innocent as to the origin and continuance of various marital difficulties: as if it doesn’t take two.

Of course, historically, there was indeed the dreadful double standard, with the “good girls” and the “bad girls.” That was because men demanded immoral sex (this being our leading fault). It was very wrong, and it was primarily men’s fault. There will always be women willing to take advantage of men’s weakness and leading sin, for profit. Hence, prostitution.

Likewise, the Victorians went too far in terms of being anti-sex (though this is often exaggerated). The devil exploits everything to his ends. If a culture adopts a fairly Christian outlook that premarital sex is wrong, then there will be the tendency, because of sin, to go too far and get to the place where sex is regarded as “dirty” and “evil”: even marital sex.

That was what started ancient gnosticism. But this isn’t the Catholic position. The Church Fathers strongly tended towards this error, too. I’ve read them. I compiled three books of their quotes. They were opposing the rampantly sexual pagan Romans, and so they sometimes went too far in the other direction. This is the human tendency, and the devil exploits it to the max. The true biblical view is found in the Song of Solomon: unashamed sexuality within the bounds that God set for us, for our own good and pleasure.

George Ryder #racist abagond.wordpress.com

If you want to be a real anti-racist you cannot be white, it’s an oxymoron. The reason for this is you can never trust your oppressor to be an ally, EVER.

Tim Wise can talk a good game, but it really doesn’t matter. When everything is said and done he’s an opportunistic white guy who makes a living educating people on things that he has no real experience with.

If Tim Wise were to even attempt to be an anti-racist he’d be on the sidelines supporting real anti-racists. Not at the forefront stealing jobs from people far more qualified than him to talk about racism in America.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

Are You Hateful Enough?

By David J. Stewart

Psalm 97:10a, “Ye that love the LORD, hate evil.”

[RIGHT]image[/RIGHT] The unsaved world discourages hatred in all forms, but the Bible teaches that there is a good form of hatred—hatred against evil. In fact, God commands it in Psalm 97:10, "Ye that love the LORD, hate evil." Sadly, most professed Christians today don't hate evil like they should. Hatred is a strong word and every Christian should have a strong feeling of dislike against evil that makes us want to do something about it.

Abortion

Every born-again believer ought to hate evil in every form; such as the evil of abortion (i.e., murdering little living and growing babies). Abortion is brutal and demonic. When one stops to realize that America silently passed the 50,000,000 abortion mark in January of 2008, it's hard to fathom that 25% of our U.S. population has been holocausted. The official U.S. population for 1970 was 203,211,926.1 Since 1970, Americans have killed one-fourth of their own children. Tearfully consider that in 2004, there were 74 abortions for every 100 births in New York City. Can you imagine?

We ought not hate the people getting abortions, nor the people performing abortions; but we must hate the evil of abortion itself. To deliberately kill a child is evil. When you think of the blessings in your life, you should praise God that your parents didn't believe in abortion. Sadly, a mother's womb is the most dangerous place to be in the world today. This is a sad fact. There's not enough hatred today against abortion. God tells us to hate abortion, because abortion is very evil. If you don't hate the sin of abortion, then you DON'T love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Hateful Heathens

Ironically, it appears that some of the strongest hatred today is against Bible-believing, Christ-honoring, Christians who do hate evil as the Bible teaches. Flaming homosexual, Ellen DeGeneres, criticizes Bible-believers who “use the Bible to justify their hate.” Uh, Ellen, Psalm 97:10 does teach believers to hate, to hate evil. Hatred for sin and evil can be justified with the Bible. Ellen calls such faithful Christians, “idiotic” ...

"I don't see full-page ads saying `Stop the Hate, Stop the Violence." said DeGeneres. "These same evil, idiotic, so-called God-loving people who use the Bible to justify their hate, I'm sure still feel deep down that blacks aren't equal to whites because the Bible was also used to justify slavery."

SOURCE: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_199810/ai_n8815714

It seems that Ellen DeGeneres has quite a bit of hatred herself toward Christians who hate evil, which brings a Bible verse to mind... Proverb 29:27, “An unjust man is an abomination to the just: and he that is upright in the way is abomination to the wicked.” An “abomination” is hatred coupled with disgust. To the righteous man, he not only views “Sin City” Las Vegas as evil, but as repulsive and disgusting. I think Hollywood (or Hollyweird) is an abomination. It's not just saturated with sin and evil, it's a disgusting place of sick-minded perverts and demented God-haters. Walt Disney employs some of the most sick-minded, perverted, immoral, sin-loving, Bible-hating, Christ-hating, blasphemous, people in the world. That's why their shows and movies are so abominable. Most of the movies and programs Walt Disney produces nowadays are utterly offensive to any decent person. There's no garbage pail that wreaks with the stench of rot and maggots anymore than Walt Disney, Hollywood and all the other heathen movies producers of this sinful generation. Even so, come, Lord Jesus! Pay Day is Coming!

Before the Apostle Paul became a Christian, he hated the Church and persecuted and tried to destroy it (Galatians 1:13). The Word of God brings out the best and the worst in people. You either love God or you are his enemy. People either love the Bible or hate it. Jesus said that the same world that hated Him, and crucified Him, would hate us and treat us the same horrible way. Increasingly, American society and nations abroad are becoming hostile towards Christianity. People who live contrary to the Word of God know it, and therefore hate the Bible intensely. Romans 1:18, "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness." The Bible says that the wicked "hold the truth in unrighteousness." In other words, they are sinning in full knowledge of what they are doing. Ellen DeGeneres KNOWS lesbianism is a sin, and is against nature, and is abnormal and will eventually bring the judgment of God. I do not hate anyone, please know that. I only hate sin. I love sinners, because they are people whom Jesus Christ died for to pay for their sins. God loves humanity, which includes sinners too. God hates sin and evil, but he is waiting for men and women to repent (2nd Peter 3:9).

Immodesty and and Lewd Behavior

Our love for Jesus Christ is easily measured by the intensity of our hatred for sin and evil. Most people take sin lightly nowadays. It means nothing for a professed Christian woman these days to put on a miniskirt or wear a low-cut blouse. These are the sinful clothing styles of the world. 1st Timothy 2:9 and other Scriptures teach that a Christian lady ought to dress modestly as an expression of her chastity and virtuous behavior.

Hollywood female celebrities dress like sleazy-trash, whores and bimbos. I'm not trying to be unkind, I'm being moral. It is a shameful disgrace the sinful way in which American women dress immodestly nowadays, wearing tight blouses, exposing their thighs, causing men to lust in adulterous thoughts, which is adultery (Matthew 5:28). To such whorish women, it's game, a thrill a tease. They will answer to God. God tells women to dress in "modest apparel." Christian ladies ought to hate immodest clothing. Dressing seductively in public is sinful. Women and girls ought to dress in modest clothing. This is what God says in the Bible. It's rare nowadays to find women who adhere to strict Christian dress codes. Ladies ought to wear dresses. We live in a sicko society that is trying to turn teenage girls into whores. Walt Disney makes teenage girls look like whores by moral standards 50-years ago. America has lost it's respect for God, morality, the marriage, decency and Christianity. Now we've got a Muslim U.S. President who despises Christianity and won't even salute the U.S. flag during the national anthem. Sad.

What Do You Hate?

Everybody hates something. A lot of people hate the Bible. A lot of people hate Christianity. A lot of people hate a righteous person. What we ought to hate is evil. Hatred against sin is good. The unsaved world will always demonize Bible-believing Christians who hate sin. The Devil has successfully built a false religion today, that encompasses many denominations who have been taught that any form of hatred is bad. This is simply not true. God commands us as His children to HATE EVIL. That means we should hate drunkenness, fornication, whorish clothing, homosexuality, government theft and violations of the U.S. Constitution. We ought to hate lying and false advertising and cruelty to animals. We ought to hate the heathen public school system, CPS who thinks they own our children and the evil sin of divorce. We ought to hate indifference and false religion. We ought to hate movies that curse in God's name, songs and books that diminish, attack and belittle the Bible. It's seems that every movie made today has to have someone cursing in God's name. Someone told me that they like the Sylvester Stallone movie, First Blood; yet God's name is taken in vain no less than 10 times throughout the movie. The movie is evil, of the Devil and dishonors God. I hate any movie that takes God's name in vain. God created us, feeds us, gives us the health and life we enjoy, and then people go around making movies that insult God, curse in his name in anger and show utter disrespect for the Lord. No wonder America is going to Hell in a wheelbarrow. We ought to hate when anyone takes God's precious and holy name in vain.

The Jews have some crazy little thing they do, spelling God as G_d, claiming that is their way of respecting God. Yet, in total hypocrisy, they opening reject Jesus Christ as their Messiah. They are effectively atheists, because they reject Jesus as God in the flesh (John 1:1-3.14; John 10:33; I Timothy 3:16; Colossians 2:9; Revelation 1:8; John 14:1-6). We should hate the false religion of Judaism, which denies Jesus Christ as the Savior, and teaches in their Talmud that it's ok for priests to molest 3-year old girls. Why doesn't Jack Chick ever expose the Jew's false religion instead of attacking the Muslims for everything. The Muslims weren't the masterminds behind 911. We ought to hate the New World Order, which aims to destroy Christianity, eliminate true American freedom (i.e., out Bill of Rights) and bring to fruition a Communist Police State to smash resistance from Christians, patriots and those who defend the U.S. Constitution. It's frightening how insane many people get when you hand them a badge, a gun and give them authority over the common man. Then stuff like this happens. There's a million punks running around America nowadays, called police, including she-men women who belong at home baking cookies, who don't care about your Bill of Rights. They just want to smash you, take your kids and force you to comply with the New World Order's Communist agendas. You're now guilty until proven innocent. You don't have to be proven guilty to go to prison nowadays, the jury simply needs to "think" you're guilty and you're a goner. And they call that justice.

Conclusion

I could write a book on all the evils and sins which born-again Christians should hate, but that is not necessary. You have a Bible and I hope you read it. Most Christians neglect their Bible and don't read it enough (if at all). Hearing the Bible increases our faith (Romans 10:17). In discouraging times, we need to read the Bible to boost our faith. In times of loss, when our friends hurt us, family betrays us and the Devil comes after us to kill, steal and destroy (John 10:10), we ought to spend more time in the Scriptures and rest upon the promises of God. God will keep His Word, His name is at stake. You can rest assure on the promises of God.

Let us hate evil and expose it wherever it is found. You don't have to be unkind to people, but you don't have to go along with the evil either. Professed Christians all across America go to Walt Disney, Las Vegas casinos, Jack Daniel's brewery, Elvis Presley's mansion, et cetera. There are all shameful places. The need of this hour is for Christians to act like Christians and get angry over sin, because the Devil's crowd doesn't care.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

Are You Hateful Enough?

The unsaved world discourages hatred in all forms, but the Bible teaches that there is a good form of hatred—hatred against evil. In fact, God commands it in Psalm 97:10, "Ye that love the LORD, hate evil." Sadly, most professed Christians today don't hate evil like they should. Hatred is a strong word and every Christian should have a strong feeling of dislike against evil that makes us want to do something about it.

...

Our love for Jesus Christ is easily measured by the intensity of our hatred for sin and evil. Most people take sin lightly nowadays. It means nothing for a professed Christian woman these days to put on a miniskirt or wear a low-cut blouse. These are the sinful clothing styles of the world. 1st Timothy 2:9 and other Scriptures teach that a Christian lady ought to dress modestly as an expression of her chastity and virtuous behavior.

Hollywood female celebrities dress like sleazy-trash, whores and bimbos. I'm not trying to be unkind, I'm being moral. It is a shameful disgrace the sinful way in which American women dress immodestly nowadays, wearing tight blouses, exposing their thighs, causing men to lust in adulterous thoughts, which is adultery (Matthew 5:28). To such whorish women, it's game, a thrill a tease. They will answer to God. God tells women to dress in "modest apparel." Christian ladies ought to hate immodest clothing. Dressing seductively in public is sinful. Women and girls ought to dress in modest clothing. This is what God says in the Bible. It's rare nowadays to find women who adhere to strict Christian dress codes. Ladies ought to wear dresses. We live in a sicko society that is trying to turn teenage girls into whores. Walt Disney makes teenage girls look like whores by moral standards 50-years ago. America has lost it's respect for God, morality, the marriage, decency and Christianity. Now we've got a Muslim U.S. President who despises Christianity and won't even salute the U.S. flag during the national anthem. Sad.

Everybody hates something. A lot of people hate the Bible. A lot of people hate Christianity. A lot of people hate a righteous person. What we ought to hate is evil. Hatred against sin is good. The unsaved world will always demonize Bible-believing Christians who hate sin. The Devil has successfully built a false religion today, that encompasses many denominations who have been taught that any form of hatred is bad. This is simply not true. God commands us as His children to HATE EVIL. That means we should hate drunkenness, fornication, whorish clothing, homosexuality, government theft and violations of the U.S. Constitution. We ought to hate lying and false advertising and cruelty to animals. We ought to hate the heathen public school system, CPS who thinks they own our children and the evil sin of divorce. We ought to hate indifference and false religion. We ought to hate movies that curse in God's name, songs and books that diminish, attack and belittle the Bible. It's seems that every movie made today has to have someone cursing in God's name. Someone told me that they like the Sylvester Stallone movie, First Blood; yet God's name is taken in vain no less than 10 times throughout the movie. The movie is evil, of the Devil and dishonors God. I hate any movie that takes God's name in vain. God created us, feeds us, gives us the health and life we enjoy, and then people go around making movies that insult God, curse in his name in anger and show utter disrespect for the Lord. No wonder America is going to Hell in a wheelbarrow. We ought to hate when anyone takes God's precious and holy name in vain.

The Jews have some crazy little thing they do, spelling God as G_d, claiming that is their way of respecting God. Yet, in total hypocrisy, they opening reject Jesus Christ as their Messiah. They are effectively atheists, because they reject Jesus as God in the flesh (John 1:1-3.14; John 10:33; I Timothy 3:16; Colossians 2:9; Revelation 1:8; John 14:1-6). We should hate the false religion of Judaism, which denies Jesus Christ as the Savior, and teaches in their Talmud that it's ok for priests to molest 3-year old girls. Why doesn't Jack Chick ever expose the Jew's false religion instead of attacking the Muslims for everything. The Muslims weren't the masterminds behind 911. We ought to hate the New World Order, which aims to destroy Christianity, eliminate true American freedom (i.e., out Bill of Rights) and bring to fruition a Communist Police State to smash resistance from Christians, patriots and those who defend the U.S. Constitution. It's frightening how insane many people get when you hand them a badge, a gun and give them authority over the common man. Then stuff like this happens. There's a million punks running around America nowadays, called police, including she-men women who belong at home baking cookies, who don't care about your Bill of Rights. They just want to smash you, take your kids and force you to comply with the New World Order's Communist agendas. You're now guilty until proven innocent. You don't have to be proven guilty to go to prison nowadays, the jury simply needs to "think" you're guilty and you're a goner. And they call that justice.

I could write a book on all the evils and sins which born-again Christians should hate, but that is not necessary. You have a Bible and I hope you read it.

Matteo Salvini #racist rt.com

‘They hate Italians and must resign’: Salvini attacks mayors resisting harsh immigration rules

The times when mayors of Palermo, Florence and Naples could cash in on illegal immigrants are over, Italy's Interior Minister Matteo Salvini said, vowing that those resisting the new policies will answer before law and history.

“Those who help the illegal immigrants, hate Italians,” Salvini said, blasting his opponents on Facebook and Twitter.

The minister from the conservative Lega Nord Party promised that the rebelling city heads will “answer before law and history.” And it's no idle threat, as the former mayor of the Calabrian town of Riace is currently under house arrest on charges of aiding and abetting illegal immigration.

“Certain mayors look back fondly on the good old times of immigration, but for them the party is over!” Salvini said.

By “certain mayors” he meant the heads of Palermo, Florence and Naples, who he gave the choice of resigning from their posts.

The three mayors insisted that some parts of Salvini's security decree aimed at curbing illegal migration to the country were unconstitutional and that they would refuse to follow them.

According to the new decree, migrants can no longer apply for full residency after a two-year asylum stay – but Palermo mayor Leoluca Orlando wants his city to continue this practice. Denying migrants access to health care and other essential municipal services would have an opposite effect and put them on the path of crime instead, he argued in the interview to the newspaper La Repubblica.

His resistance to the decree was “not an act of civil disobedience or conscientious objection, but the simple application of the constitutional rights that are guaranteed to all those, who live in our country,” Orlando said.

He also announced plans to take the anti-migrant rules to the Constitutional Court for the judges to rule on how they comply with Italy's principal law.

The mayor of Palermo was backed by his counterpart from Florence, Dario Nardella, who insisted that his city wouldn't cave in to the law that “expels asylum-seekers and, without repatriating them, throws them out onto the street.”

Naples Mayor Luigi de Magistris said on Thursday that he was going to open the city's port to Sea Watch, a NGO ship that had been involved in rescuing migrants trying to cross the into Italy on rafts and rickety boats. The vessel has been stuck in the stormy Mediterranean for more than two weeks now, with 32 asylum-seekers onboard.

“I hope this boat comes to Naples because, despite what the government says, we will let it into the port,” de Magistris said, adding that he “will be first to lead the rescue effort.”

Following his comments, Salvini reiterated that that all the ports in Italy were closed to migrant-rescuing ships.

Salvini’s fellow deputy PM and leader of the Five Star Movement, Luigi Di Maio, dismissed the rebellion of the mayors as “electioneering” and an attempt to achieve publicity by exploiting the migrant issue.

Salvini got his post after the euroskeptic coalition government came to power last year, with the migrant issue playing a key role in the success of Lega Nord and Five Star Movement at the polls. The new government pledged to deport 500,000 migrants that were in the country. Italy has become one of the prime destinations for asylum-seekers from Middle East and North Africa after the Arab Spring shattered many countries in the region.

Amba Azaad #sexist thenewinquiry.com

It is imperative to resist the disproportionate foregrounding of cishet male loneliness because the structurally oppressed manifest their benign loneliness symptoms differently from those who suffer from the malignant disease of thwarted entitlement. Buried inside the lonely-men essays is the threat disguised as suggestion that we feel concern for Lonely Men because Lonely Men can turn violent. This is a red herring in much the same way that alcoholism is used as an excuse for male violence; the problem isn’t alcohol or loneliness but patriarchal masculinity. Meanwhile no surgeon general is declaring racism or misogyny to be an epidemic despite the increasing number of people literally being killed by men “suffering” from these states of mind. It takes a special kind of self-centeredness to be able to cite stats that show that marriage hurts women’s life expectancy and continue to advocate it as a solution to save lonely men instead of trying to fix the toxic husband syndrome that is killing women. Men who demand that women concern themselves with the problem of lonely men in order to ensure their own safety are issuing the same hackneyed threats that patriarchy entrenches—a disguised demand that women invest their energy in socializing boys, in dating men, in doing even more care work than we already do.

Looking at some of the funded programs tackling the “epidemic” it becomes clear that creating spaces where men can feel free to be misogynists is one of the effects of how men warp community responses to loneliness. The first Men’s Shed—a community space where mostly older men could get together to work with their hands and socialize—was set up in Australia in 1998 and by 2010 was receiving funding from the Australian government under its National Male Health Policy. (There are no Men’s Sheds for any of the men trapped in Australia’s detention centers for the crime of being refugees on a boat.) According to the U.K. Men’s Shed Association the rate of growth of Men’s Sheds is between six and nine new sheds a month. (The U.K. government is planning to remove domestic-abuse shelters from housing benefits. On average in England men kill two women a week.) Public policy approves of self-segregating spaces with “old-fashioned mateship and . . . no pressure” (a liability-free way to say “No Homo No Feminist Cooties”) where men can be cajoled and lured into being cared for. Meanwhile sex workers, drug users, and transgender people are more likely to be harassed and jailed by police than be provided with spaces where they can be gently encouraged to talk about their loneliness.

Even though there’s scientific evidence that older people’s brains benefit from learning “something that is unfamiliar, and which requires prolonged and active mental engagement as you cultivate a new set of behaviors,” none of the men saving men seem to think of teaching men feminism. Or noncompetitive dancing instead of walking football. Or even just how to talk face to face. (Women’s magazines have been filled with helpful tips on how to attract a man for decades; perhaps the forlorn gentlemen looking for companionship might start with those?) In spite of all the studies pointing out how aged women have better coping skills—and, therefore, health—than aged men, toxic masculinity has conspired to misrepresent the happy ending of crones, hags, and witches as a scary fairytale. No lonely men talk about parenting, or about helping their male parent friends socialize their male kids in a less toxic fashion. All of them turn for advice to psychologists and sociologist experts, none suggest taking relationship advice from the demographic they keep citing as doing it better—women.

Individual loneliness is a fickle, nebulous sensation. Like other emotions, it is deeply situational—it makes a difference whether you feel lonely because every time you walk down the street a slur is shouted at you or you feel lonely because the spouse you beat every third night has finally left you. As individuals we are not owed freedom from loneliness any more than we can demand love from those we want it from. But collectively we can recognize patterns of loneliness as symptoms of awful structural injustices. And we can use our loneliness as impetus to work toward systems that ethically meet our social and emotional needs. The way to help alleviate the loneliness of the oppressed is to continue to destroy oppressive structures and support organizing and resistance. The only way to ethically survive loneliness is to look at labor: to ask who performs care work for me, who I perform it for, what systems are viable and where I transmute being abandoned to resistance.

Men who demand empathy for their gendered fear of dying un-cared-for, unwanted, and unmourned without referencing feminism are acting in bad faith—they would like us to pretend there is no distinction between the solitary deaths of an abuser and an abused person. They would like gendered consoling while remaining indifferent to the deaths they, as a gender, are responsible for. They would like cosmetic cultural change while believing that emasculation is bad, as though it is horrible to change out of being a toxic oppressor. They would like us to care about men as men, when there are people—disabled, old, sick, poor, queer, migrant, discriminated-against PEOPLE—who are dying and are lonely. Those are the ones we should be focused on. If some of them happen to be men, well, let us try to not hold it against them.

Hans-Georg Maasen #wingnut dw.com

German ex-spy chief pushes Angela Merkel's CDU further right
The former head of Germany's domestic intelligence agency has been accused of courting the far right. Hans-Georg Maassen is the noisiest member of the conservative wing of Angela Merkel's CDU.

Hans-Georg Maassen, the man once in charge of tracking political extremists in Germany, has developed a brash second career on social media since his sacking last year.

Largely delivered on Twitter, Maassen's provocative pronouncements have created another headache for Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union (CDU), which is facing an uncertain era after the chancellor's retirement.

Maassen's tweets have also raised questions about how his political opinions may have influenced the direction investigations took during his six years as head of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV).

Maassen's office, from which he was fired last year by Interior Minister Horst Seehofer, is in charge of keeping tabs on the activities of Islamists, neo-Nazis and antifa groups inside Germany.

Anti-immigration and climate science

The most controversial of these social media posts came last Monday, when Maassen shared an article by right-wing blog Journalistenwatch claiming that the rescue of migrants by the ship Sea-Watch 3 was effectively a hoax orchestrated by German public broadcaster ARD.

Several media outlets subsequently pointed out that Journalistenwatch was run by the founders of a now-defunct minor right-wing party called Die Freiheit (The Freedom), which itself was under observation by the BfV. It also frequently signals support for the pan-European Identitarian Movement, another far-right group that has caught the attention of the office Maassen once ran.

But while that tweet was subsequently deleted, Maassen seems to have developed a taste for the notoriety his social media presence has triggered.

In the past week, the ex-intelligence chief's tweets have included posting an article denying the climate crisis in Cologne-based tabloid Express, comparisons between the German public broadcasters and the dictatorship-led media of communist East Germany and a cartoon implying that media outlet Der Spiegel mainly contains fairy tales. He also had more criticism of the rescue missions in the Mediterranean:

"Don't let yourself be persuaded that this is about rescuing people at sea," he tweeted on Friday. "These migrants aren't shipwrecked people, and not refugees. They have boarded trafficker boats as would-be foreign immigrants to get brought to Europe by a shuttle service."

Pushing the conservative CDU

There have been many clues to Maassen's political leanings since his departure from the BfV last year, which came after he cast doubt on videos that showed people of immigrant background being attacked in Chemnitz. Seehofer attempted to find Maassen a job in his ministry, but the outcry proved too great for the government.

Maassen's Twitter profile, which is emblazoned with a slogan "Change. Germany can do better," also includes a link to the Werte Union ("Union of Values"), an organization that represents the conservative wing of the CDU and sees its main purpose in reviving what it believes are values that the CDU leadership has lost.

Maassen has become the Werte Union's most prominent public face in the last few weeks, and it has seen an uptick in membership over the past two years.

Of all the high-profile figures on the right of the CDU (another is erstwhile leadership challenger Friedrich Merz), Maassen has been the most radical in his anti-immigration declarations.

At a Werte Union event in Wernheim, southern Germany, in late June, the 56-year-old sparked another media storm by saying, "I didn't join the CDU 30 years ago so that 1.8 million Arabs could come to Germany." That statement was greeted with cheers from the assembled party members, according to a report in the Rhein-Neckar-Zeitung, and drew plenty of outrage from opposition leaders.

Maassen described his own political position as "not conservative, just realistic," but other signs suggest he is not above political strategy: In mid-June, he gave an interview to public radio station Deutschlandfunk in which he suggested that a coalition with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) was not out of the question in future.

The AfD is currently polling first in some states in eastern Germany, three of which are due to hold elections this fall, putting the CDU under considerable pressure from the right. All the leading figures in the CDU have so far ruled out forming a government with populist AfD, but there are signs that the resolve in the upper echelons of some regional CDU parties is starting to buckle.

Haight #racist stormfront.org

Re: Am I German, I mean German-American?

No, you're not German, you're not even Germanic, you're a Germano-Celt, mostly Celt. You said yourself you are only 12.5% or 1/8th German, so how does 1/8th mean "German" to you?
To be considered German you would need to be at least 50% by blood, and have immediate family in Germany, otherwise we may as well just call people what ever takes their fancy, and thus dive head first into the anything goes area of Cultural-Marxist ideology.

To be German isn't to be classed as the "best" of the best either, and if one is looking for the least compromised of the European races then it isn't the German, but the Scandinavian races that are the purest of Europeans.

If you want to identify with an old religion then it would be the Celtic version of the indigenous European religion as that is the majority in you. If you need a culture to identify with, again it is the Celtic that would be the best option, or the Germano-Celtic (a true ethnicity and culture in itself).

Now, who gives a sh!t...these tests are a waste of money. If you want to know your type then look in the mirror.

This is a good example of why I don't agree with European ethnicities breeding with each other, it creates confusion and a lack of identity in the children. Before you White Nationalists say "Oh, you're just causing division" why not apply your own standards of no race-mixing to your own people first rather than to the people who are irrelevant, the non Europeans.

Prefrontal_Cortex #racist chimpout.com


"The next time you see a negro...look at the negroes' forehead. Note the cranial slope as compared to an Alpine, Nordic or Mediterranean Caucasian. The sloping forehead is consistent with reduced cranial capacity with a specific reduction of the volume of the prefrontal cortex of the brain as compared to Europeans."