Similar posts

NotForMe1 #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Blackpill] The dark pussy pill.

One of the most things femoids hate about themselves is when they have a brownie down there instead of a pink flower.

They hate it because it looks like asshole. Don't believe me? Google about it.

Most women do have asshole pussy and it's disgusting. Even men have lighter asshole than foids actual pussy.

So my boys, whenever you're in a fight with a hole, just tell her she has a dark hole personality or something like that.

Tell her brownies suck.

Sparrow's Song #sexist #crackpot #psycho incels.co

[Serious] Is cooming in a femasite's mouth a form of femdom?

Not cooming in a femasite when raping/fucking her, that is just reproduction. Blowjobs are different because the mouth is not a sex organ and does not sexually tingle. So getting a blowjob is like getting dominated by a foid to some degree because she is in control of your pp and makes you feel feel ding tingles without receiving cunt rumbles at the same time. I don't know what it feels like, but I imagine it feels like getting tickled by the babysitter as a kid, which was emasculating. I remember the babysitter would tickle me and I would squirm and although it didn't feel unpleasant, I hated it because someone could just touch me a certain way and make my body feel sensations that strong, it makes you feel weak and powerless. It was even worse when they wouldn't stop until I said "uncle". So getting head is basically a foid using her mouth to tickle your peen and cooming in her mouth is like saying "uncle" and tapping out. It's different from cooming in a toilet's penetration canal because her vagina is just the flesh sleeve you used to shoot your DNA into her eggs, your hip thrusts are what led to the cooming. Is getting a blowjob giving foids more power?

I still want to put my boner in a hole's mouth, I just don't want her to think she ever had control or power over my body. If I was getting my dick sucked, I would try to avoid squirming as much as possible and I would keep an expressionless, statue face the whole time so she wouldn't know the power level of her throat game. When I would be about to nut, I would pull out and thrust her pussy until I coomed in her so it would be my hip thrusts that made me coom and not her own work with her mouth, that way she wouldn't feel like she defeated me in some way. The best solution would be to unhinge her jaw like a snake and throat rape her as if her throat was a cunt, because then you would be in control.

PolishJames #sexist #crackpot incels.net

Attractive women have beta male fetish

I really don't know why, but young and attractive females, the ones that I saw on Instagram or Twitch, you know "the streamers", only fans creators and fit influencers are always have sissy beta male as a partner. I really doesn't know why females choose men weaker and looking worse than them.
Is that a special domination mechanism? Or they choose the weakest ones because of their money to get even more money from their beta buxx partners?

ionlycopenow #sexist #crackpot #conspiracy incels.co

Have you ever seen an anxious Chad?

Let's get this out of the way, I'm talking about real anxiety/stress, not made up foid anxiety. It's fact that these things come about over years of social neglect, abuse, isolation, etc, you cannot be constantly orbitted and validated and still be anxious

So this takes me back, whens the last time you saw a neurotic, overly nervous and stressed male who was good looking/Chad? I would bet never. I never have.

I'm sure IT type morons will spoit about muH cOmPleXiTy, (then hilariously claim nonnfacts like it being caused by low serotonin, something no study has ever confirmed, it's a meme pushed by pharma to sell harmful non helpful Jew pills) but some things are truly simpler than they seem. If you're anxious and stressed all the time as a male, you're ugly and get no pussy. It's nature putting pressure on you to do so. Sex is a natural destressor.

Yeah, I think having those things is a sign of being ugly/low smv as a male. I don't think you'll ever attractive guys who get girls have any of that.

not even once

in sophomore year of HS my 'oneitis' was dating a guy who claimed to have some anxiety order but he wasn't really an archetypal Chad and also he used to touch her right in front of me so yeah it's just foid "anxiety" like you mentioned

At best I've seen them mildly upset or disappointed when they failed an exam. That's it. That's the peak of their negative emotions

Meanwhile, cels get panic attacks over going outside, or thinking about the future or whatever. What a joke.

armis #crackpot #psycho #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Foids and chads are both soulless tools of nature and DNA

Foids and chads are very similar. Chad's brain is primitive, emotional and feminine. Similar to how foids use their pussy, chad uses his genetics, so he never has to be challenged and never develops any soul or character.

So it's clear why all scientists and great leaders were male non-chads, like Napoleon who was a bullied incel in his youth, and Hitler, who was an incel until he rose to power.

weuripgc #sexist #psycho #crackpot reddit.com

The pussy economy

How Beckys and Stacies with low standards are our actual worse enemy. I truly couldn't care less about how many guys a woman has slept with. My initial reaction would be to be happy for her and that she's living her best life. I do not think of them as a nasty person or lesser than for it. I do think they are kind of playing themselves though by letting men (especially men not within their looks match!!!)use them as a masturbation toy without anything in return. Dick is an abundance, pussy is valuable. They are decreasing the value of pussy. I think about how her actions affect what men think is attainable and how that affects ME. It's the most conflicting feeling. It is selfish I know but it fucks over all of us femcels in the end. Yeah, this is a bit like hypergamy in a way but the thing is... it's not about men dating up like women it's them being able to give nothing in return for sex. Which is all they care about and want until they are 35, old and ugly and finally want to settle down. This is why they are the way they are so freely (TRASH). Women with an actual say (desirable normies) allow this shit. They have the chance to set the rules and they fucking DON'T. Pick me bitches are the BANE OF MY FUCKING EXISTENCE AND ALL SHOULD BE EXECUTED ON SIGHT. Imagine if women all around the world set a standard for men. If men wanted pussy then they have to meet these standards to get it. It would filter out all shitty entitled below average men in like 10 years tops. We already have this with men who are undesirable and insufferable with NO redeeming quality. Natural selection automatically filters them out of the gene pool.

If Becky's bar wasn't so low, life for us femcels would not be as bad. The below average man would actually have to date within their looks match. We will never have this way of life but it's nice to think of it. This is why I make sure all my attractive friends know they can do better than whatever average loser they are dating (I usually go for their looks and stature). This is how we keep balance. If you have attractive family members and friends the best you can do for your self is to make sure they date up as high as they can. Don't encourage them to settle for average moids. The average moid now thinks they are better than what they actually are and it fucks up our choices as femcels even more. Theres a few different points of this thread, it's more about how much I hate pick me bitches and girls that have no idea how much better they can do. I hate seeing ugly men with attractive nice women. The only way this would be acceptable is if the man has money, I have a lot of respect for gold diggers bc they know their worth. The modern male, for the most part, is only good for money. They should work 23 hours a day with 30 minutes for sleep and 30 mins to eat. I truly believe the media selling very average looking men as desirable to the masses of women is a total con job by higher-ups to ensure the average moid gets to reproduce. So many of the men that get that silly magazine title of "sexiest man in the world" are average as fuck and nothing more.

Here's the kicker: women in general don't think they are good looking enough (even if they're attractive) for good looking men. There is this huge myth that good looking men are inherently more shitty than your average man, but in reality they have the exact same personality. Men are told to date up, women are told to date who they think they deserve.

So attractive women date guys that they settle for, and end up realizing that not only are they settling for looks, but that their boyfriends personality is shit. Those attractive girls don't leave their mediocre partners because of a myriad of reasons ultimately caused by internalized misogyny which makes them feel like they need to take care of their inadequate boyfriend, slut shames them, tells them they're not good enough, and that they're worthless if they're alone.

This cycle will continue until women realize that being alone and having standards is better than accommodating a man that only brings them stress and heartache.

This is exactly what I thought, you worded this so well! Average men are really scamming them. These blue pilled Beckys need to get pink pilled. Attractive women, most of the time are already pink pilled bc of dealing with stupid horny men since they hit puberty. It's the Beckys that need it the most. Some of them are already pink pilled but still succumb to men afterwards bc they are weak and want to live that nuclear family life. On the positive side, I see that "men are trash" has become a universally agreed-upon truth by women that are more socially aware and non traditional ways of living are becoming more popular.

Rassimov #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Blackpill] The first thing a GIRL thinks about when seeing an Incel ― IS HAVING SEX WITH HIM

Before any of you low-iq apes decides to gang-up on me, ask yourself this ― did a girl ever had a immediate visceral reaction the moment she saw you? Did it look like this?

Flashing images with the two of you copulating like bunny rabbits raced through her dirty little mind in that millisecond.

The good news is that you're probably disgusting, but not completely creepy (which is worse) or invisible. Her body actually had to 'forcefully resist' the incitement to enjoy that ugliness of yours, which deceitfully entered her perverted female brains.

Wat?
All women desire incels?

The very exclamation 'ew' is already a retroactive reaction to the unconscious thought of banging you.

Yesh. Ok.
But how does is help me to improve my miserable existence? Or it doesn't?

Fucking fatties was a taboo sanctioned by society not that long ago, today it's a appraised fetish. We should work in this framework.

Where are all those woman enjoying fetish with incels then?

You have no idea how ruthlessly any girl whos taste would deviate from the norm is roasted by her friends circle for having a 'shit taste' in men. This is how hypergamy is re-inforced on a social level - by bullying.

OP, it's not the "imagining sex with you" part that causes the visceral reaction, it's the "YOUR FACE" part.

A woman's thought process is preoccupied with vetting men that already catch their eye.

This is some next level cope

"Secretly they want to fuck us, they just resist it"

Human sexuality is not a politically correct affair. Arousal and disgust often times overlap. Reductionist evolutionary explanations of sexuality like "dick in vagina because procreation" cannot explain the spectrum of sexual depravity humans indulge in, fetishising things completely irrelevant to optimal fitness or health indicators.

Sounds based and makes sense.
But do you have a specific plan or an outline?

I would like to see a sufficiently coherent approach to this, and the reason I made this thread was to break the intellectual ceiling this forum has — Keep in mind that evolutionary speaking human shit is also yuck, yet scat fetish is a million dollar porn industry.

BlkPillPres #crackpot #sexist #kinkshaming #psycho incels.co

Blackpill The Cultural & Political Importance Of "Deep Fake" Porn In This Modern Gynocratic Society

Some woman runs to be president next time, someone creates a high quality deepfake porn of her from getting gangbanged and releases it. Its goes viral and she loses the election, because "IT BREAKS THE FUCKING MATRIX"

As a society we all like to pretend like "women are people like men" but deep down we know full well they aren't (and even women know it). Every "professional" "high class" woman who we see in some business suit, later is going to be on her knees submissively choking on dick and being debased in every way possible. This is why having a female boss feels so weird to many men, you know she is submissive, you know her existence is undignified, but due to the mental gymnastics rules of modern society, you have to ignore and push those thoughts to the back of your mind and play along.

You can show me the most high ranking "powerful" feminist screaming in front of a crowd of thousands. Now imagine a high quality deepfake of her getting anal gaped gets blasted right behind her on a big screen that was just spelling out "Woman Power". She's just been fucking neutralized and will scream and even cry: BECAUSE THE ILLUSION WAS BROKEN THE LIES SHE WAS TELLING HERSELF WERE REVEALED SHE KNOWS IT, AND EVERYONE WHO SEES IT KNOWS IT.

EVERYBODY WHO SAW THAT VIDEO WAS JUST BITCH SLAPPED AND TOLD: "No this is women's worth, stop coping, she's going to be doing this later tonight, how is this empowering?. A woman's existence is inherently about submission and debasement, they should never lead anything or have a say in anything of importance"

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Based] The VAGINA is the filthiest place in the entire Milky Way Galaxy

* The vagina is a very filthy organ in and of itself with a lot of nasty flora and fauna resident therein
* Now, imagine the Average foid in her 20's who has fucked literally 100's of chads who all cum inside her and creampie her roast beef hole
* The Clinical Anatomy & pathology science of MICROCHIMERARISM states that foids retain DNA from all the men they fucked.
* Coupled with the fact that foids dont wash inside their vaginas ("its a self cleaning system teehee") imagine just how filthy a foids pussy must be
* The degenerate sex havers who "eat pussy" are probably the reason why mouth cancers and throat cancers among other cancers have increased in recent times. Some based Scientistcel should do a study on how many Modern diseases have been created by eating filthy unwashed foid pussies tbh ngl
* I bet COVID-19 was caused when an escortcelling Wuhancel decided to JohnnySinsMaxx and eat the pussy of a Noodlewhore who hadn't washed her pussy since the day she was born and those filthy disgusting pussy juices went into his respiratory system and mutated to create COVID-19.


* TLDR : PUSSY IS FILTHY GARBAGE

Epilepsy #sexist #crackpot incels.co

Foids don't feel fear and pain in the same way that we do.
They are aroused and excited by it.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————–

You underestimate how stupidly the foid brain has evolved to enjoy domination, fear, and submission.

Positron emission tomography has shown that reward pathways become activated in foids in response to pain and fear stimuli, whereas only logical areas of the brain activate for males.
Carfentanil is released in far greater amounts in the foid brain to negative sensations and pain, and their mu-opioid receptors activate to a far greater extent than male, creating a rush of pleasure like heroin.

Foids love feeling outrage, sadness, and anger. They love feeling pain, fear, and domination. They experience orgasms while giving birth and being fucked by large objects, both things that damage the body.

The foid brain is very maladapted and strange. It's irrational in the realm of pain and pleasure.
It's very possible that a foid may enjoy being killed violently.

———————————————————————————————————————————————-

Pain actually activates mu-opioid receptors in the human brain and releases carfentinil, but it does so in different areas for the male and female's brain. In the female, it is more connected with the reward pathways than the male's, where the receptors are activated in the logic-processing centers.

The beta endorphins released by pain are also regulated by estrogen, which magnifies its effect, whereas testosterone has no such effect. This acts like a heroin high.

A good percentage of women have experienced orgasm while under great pain, such as during childbirth. Also, when they are being fucked by horses, which damages their body to a great extent. So there is a real (maladaptive) connection between pain and pleasure for them.

It's not like the male where pain is just a net negative.

For the foid being murdered, it would be "painful" in a sense, but feelings of pleasure may overtake the pain to the point of orgasm.

Total Imbecile #crackpot #sexist #pedo incels.co

[SuicideFuel] A bunch of things 23+ yold girls never do anymore, I will never experience this

Teen and early 20s love only

-handcrafting you cards or gifts for your birthday even if its something cheesy like a bracelet

-random hugs and kisses throughout the day

-actually being excited to text you and see you

-cuddling in this position

-letting you touch or brush her hair

-just lying together with you and not doing anything (like being glued to her phone)

-play fighting

-being excited to try something new with you

-actually fighting for and putting effort into your relationship, after all you're her 17th boyfriend so if you make a mistake why even try and work on the relationship when she can just keep swapping boyfriends and brute force compatibility via numbers game

[deleted] #crackpot #sexist archive.fo

Almost all men are rapist deep down

Even the ones that don't rape they watch rape, they have fantasies about rape, harass women etc. I was shocked when I first time realized that men actually search "rape teen" in porn and actively watch rape, I believed that only "bad ones" watch rape porn, but I guess it's 90+% of male population doing it. In India men actively search for real life rape even when 12 years old girl is involved, they don't care, that's what excites them, so men are actually rapists, that's it. I bet when policeman or judge watches real life rape when the miracle happened and it was recorded somehow they still masturbate to it. That's why sentence for rapists is so low, because men overall DON'T THINK it is a crime. It is just material to masturbate. Men have never cared about rape and shamed victims and protect men, because almost every of them have this rapist mindset.

I think there are also studies that show that most men are OK with rape or have even raped someone before if you simply word it differently and ask them if they were OK with "forcefully" doing this or "remaining persistent" even though the woman does not "seem to like it yet".

Yeah I have read these studies, very eye-opening. Men overall are very different from what we (women) are oficially told. This "not all men are rapists" is piece of garbage of course not all are rapists, but most have this rapist mindset, they are just too afraid to rape voluntarily that's why they watch this on pornhub or other sites. You know men laugh when they heard about real-life gang bang, that's because real-life rape is just as good porn to them as what they see in pornohub.

zekr #wingnut #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Serious] Society no longer serves its one and only role of equally distributing sex.

The sentiment for young males to want to drop out of society is completely justified and makes 100% sense. Don't let anyone else tell you otherwise. We are entitled to more than you think. We live in a society that only favors those that are neurotypical, genetically superior, and culturally hive-minded. It has created a perfect echo-chamber for those with these characteristics to live inside of a genetic bubble while anyone outside of these norms is barraged until death. We are in the midst of watching full on eugenics taking place without any foothold to stop such an activity from occurring. The call to nature is not a logical fallacy, anything that we can use to our advantage in terms of reproducing is right while anything else that inhibits it has zero innate value. Two lower status males killing an alpha male is not wrong but it is now illegal thanks to modern law. Infanticide is not wrong if it will allow a female to be available to reproduce more but it is now illegal thanks to modern law. Rape is not wrong but it is now illegal thanks to modern law. "Wrong" does not exist. It is completely justified for Lower status males to perform these tasks when sexual strain is placed upon them, and high status males also deserve the right to fuck as many women as they want too in a natural setting. Nature only cares about reproducing by any means, and anything that allows you to do this is right. The only difference is that now there are 0 blockades on the way in which high status males can achieve sex and reproductive success, while a tremendous amount of blockades are placed upon lower status males.

The original intent for societies to exist was in order to stop alpha chad males from having children with 14 women like it was 10,000 ago because group cooperation beyond Dunbar's number* is impossible. Monogamy was a successful social facade kept in place because without it, people knew that everything would fall apart if only a select few males were reaping the benefits of sustainable social order with sex while the rest were paying taxes to a system that did not benefit them in the slightest. Societies only exist to rear families in the form of monogamy and solidify a group identity because without this, every man is an individual just out there trying to desperately get pussy by any means, killing, raping, pillaging, etc. and living according to nature in order to spread your seed. You might be asking, "Wait, aren't men doing the same thing now just out there trying to desperately get pussy?" well yes, except the option to kill, rape, and take what you want is completely off the table (without losing your freedom). The social stigmas and taboos that kept women in check and ALSO kept high status males in check such as only having children with one partner have been slowly disintegrating for the last 100 years. Polyamory and having children with multiple partners should by definition fall into what is considered "wrong" by society but it is not anymore. A woman sleeping with 50 different partners should by definition fall into what is considered wrong "wrong" by society, but it is not anymore.

We are in a transition just as dramatic as those 10,000 year old high status caveman males keeping 14 women for themselves and acting baffled when you are telling them you can't fuck anyone you want anymore and have to settle for one woman. Imagine how insane this must have sounded back then.This transition is why ancient societies were much more violent than we are because it took hundreds of years to solidify. These hundreds of years in transitioning have been slowly reversed and now in this short 100 year time span have we reverting back to the caveman days but worse because the high status men are protected by the state while low status men are granted absolutely nothing. No, I am not in favor of the naturalistic era full of rape and murder OR this new dystopian genetic bubble era. The only solution is the reversion to social stigmas and enforced monogamy, THE INITIAL INTENT FOR SOCIETAL COOPERATION.

TLDR: Low status males are fucked.

*Dunbar's number: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar's_number

tredolo214 #sexist #crackpot reddit.com

You’re not “awkward”. Awkward hasn’t any meaning. Women often are very weird, and awkward but because they’re women (they have a pussy and are primary sexual selectors) there’s no stigma attached to it. As a man you’re expecting to be everything, charming, funny, intelligent, etc.

In reality none of these things have any meaning. If a woman likes you, it’a pretty much looks first, mannerism second. This is separate from any potential aura captivating or anything of the sort.

Women are natural, because women with each other are hive minds that think alike. They sense each other’s similar views of men, and their feminine energy reassures each other when they’re with each other. Many women always move in groups of two or more.

TheNEET #crackpot #sexist incels.co

Serious Foids are literally just cum vampires

IDK why men keep getting tricked by their pussy hypnosis. They're literally fiat money: they have value only because men think they have value (so they create a system where having a foid is necessary for getting treated well). All they want to (and can) do is steal your semen. Considering how they're superstitious low-IQ life forms, they probably think sex is some power exchange ritual where they feed off your cum (similarly, they think abortion is a sacrifice to please their idols). Simps will put enormous amounts of money and effort into getting a foid just to get their cum sucked out. Literally all men have to do is go full monk mode and ignore foids and they'd loose all their power.

vodkacel #racist #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[It's Over] Explanation to origin of slavpill (SUICIDEFUEL, SLAVS DO NOT ENTER)

I am Russiancel living in the Netherlands (aka land of tall chads). Here is my explanation to how slavpill originated:

1. Russia is known for very beautiful femoids and also for extremely ugly men. This is a brutal fact, I've been living there for 15 years, and 80% of men are below 4/10, due to facial ugliness (big potato noses, weird head shape, etc.).

2. USSR (before 1991) was a closed country, meaning foids had no choice, but to settle down with ugly males [thus ugly genes passed on to 21st generation]. Internet became available from 1995 to general population. My father, was one of the first people in his city to gain access to it and made a business out of it. All of his customers were foids asking to set up dating profiles in western dating sites. They paid my dad 10$ for 1 hour internet session (while average monthly engineer salary was 7$).

3. Due to Russian revolution, World War 1 and World War 2, most fit Russian men have died. My grandad, a birth - defect incel, managed to get a wife because he was the only man remaining in his village after the end of WW2; all the rest have not returned. There was a deficit of men, and only males remained were unfit for war (aka incels in today's terms). It was a social stigma for a female to be unmarried, so they married handicaps, ugly, etc.

4. Now due to Westernization, Russian femoids have access to foreign chads. Majority of men are single, or are socially abused by women (beta $$$). All males in my family are beta $$$, including my dad. The only reason he managed to marry (to my step mom) is because he has a high paying job in the Netherlands and promised her all fancy vacations and $$$. She openly admitted to me that she is a gold digger JFL. Many Dutch men are marrying Slav women. My step mom has over 20 Slav women friends, all married to Dutch chads via dating sites. It is OVER for Russian men. My condolences to all my slav brothercels.

BlckPllPres #crackpot #sexist incels.co

The Average Male Is "JesterMaxxing" (That's All That "Game" Really Is), Nothing Worth Envying

I could never envy the life of the average male, because I've done all the things they've done to try and attain what they have, and I felt absolutely pathetic doing it, and I look back now thinking even if it had yielded results I likely still would not be alright with it

Here's the reality about dating and relationships that I rarely see discussed in a direct manner

YOU ARE EITHER ATTRACTIVE ENOUGH TO KEEP A WOMAN "EXCITED" JUST BY BEING AROUND HER, OR YOU HAVE TO BECOME HER FUCKING PET JESTER TO MOTIVATE, TRICK AND/OR GUILT HER INTO TRYING TO BE ATTRACTED TO YOU

That's it, that's the summary of how attraction in dating works, all this PUA fuckery is literally just JESTERMAXXING, its just men employing psychological tactics to trick, motivate or guilt a woman into trying to be attracted to them, it isn't "natural"

Chad doesn't have to memorize pick up lines, rehearse body language, insult a woman indirectly to lower her guard, etc to gain a woman's attention and attract her, his mere presence alone is enough

That's why I find it so amusing to see all these men who boast about "having game", its like boasting about who is the best pet, who can do the best tricks to please their master, WHO'S A GOOD BOY, YOU ARE, YOU ARE (here's a treat, you get a few sessions of medicore sex with some used up holes, she'll put in around 50% of the effort she does when fucking Chad, congrats)

To make it worse, there isn't even any security in your trials anymore, a man can Jestermaxx like a pro, "win her over" and have this amazing story of effort to tell his children about "how he met their mother", and ironically said children may not even be his (paternity fraud is at new highs these days), or she may have been cheating all along, or even at the current point of that relationship while he's talking to his kids, there's no security even after all the embarrassing, undignified shit you put yourself through, just to gamble for used up pussy

I mean if you had to do all this shit to get a virgin wife it would still be ridiculous, but it would atleast be understandable, but what the average man does to himself for used goods today, will always amuse me, also the remarks of incels who are "looking for love" and "female affection/validation" :feelskek:

Game is nothing to take pride in, if you have to use game, its an admission that you simply aren't attractive enough to JUST BE YOURSELF and have women be attracted to you. Its something you do to compensate for your lack of "natural ability"

Which reminds me of another thread I made:
Intelligence Is Just A Substitute For Capability
(Submitter’s note: Link leads to FSTDT quote of that rant)

The average man is not in a stable relationships, their relationships are quite unstable, with no security, and that's because the glue that holds the relationship together is a cheap knockoff of the best brand "physical attraction", its artificial, its women forcing themselves to be attracted to you, due to social norms and social pressures, while simultaneously having the choice and ability to monkey branch to an upgrade at a moments notice, that's a ridiculous framework for relationships when it comes to sustainability, it just isn't going to work long term

SlayerSlayer #racist #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Experiment] Anthropology as it relates to Inceldom

Internet incels are really just amateur anthropologists studying the mating behavior of Staceys and Chads in western civilization. It all came to me when I read the official male racial hierarchy post by @RageAgainstTDL and felt sorry for aboriginals, which made me have a deep dive into the vast spectrum of furtive cultures and civilizations bound to evaporate simply due to their lack of physical beauty. It ignited a sincere curiosity of anthropology as a whole within me, as I want to learn about mate selection, meanings of social capital, and perceptions of gender as broadly as possible outside the oppressive realm of western civilization.

Indigenous tribes fascinate me for several reasons. For one, they are genetic trash like me, so I have a natural curiosity as to what makes genetically ugly people successful in mating and happiness. My own general hunch as to why indigenous people bred themselves to be ugly is simply that their imagination has been exercised so well that beauty generally is not that important. It just seems like if you live in a culture with no technology whatsoever, your imagination and the sense of belonging you have within the universe, let alone your small tribe is greatly expanded. This imagination gives rise to local rhythms, art, concepts, Gods, beliefs. Imagined things, right or wrong, are at least things the individual has ownership of. There is a lack of competitiveness to it all that I like: it's not about the historical importance of your creations, it's about the contribution of it. You imagine elaborate reasons as to why it's the 80 year old grandmother that's the hottest bitch in the tribe.

Yes, there are insane leaps in moral relativism as it pertains to indigenous tribes, and it's weird how we give them a pass. It's understandable: if you are set to one moral standard your whole life, it requires a lot of education on other cultures to bring you into that viewpoint. It's weird how we don't apply this moral relativistic pass within our culture, simply because we assume we are a lot more in sync with normiehood than we really are. It also makes you rethink the entire concept of abuse in uncomfortable ways.

I think the big sticking point is that if you don't have written laws, taxes, and a police state, generally, people become more in sync with their communities, and thus things work out morally more often within the confines of these communities. To use corporate cringe jargon, tribesmen inherently live with intrinsic motivation to serve to their communities, because it's easy to feel a sense of importance within a small tribe. In the west, especially incels, understand deeply, our insignificance: that the machine lives easily without us, that our contributions are meager taxes enforced by the threat of prison rape.

A theme of ugly tribes: so long as your tribe is harmless (or is harmful in a self-contained way), ugly, and allow your resources to be taken, the white man generally lets you do whatever you want. It's not "multiculturalism" if you aren't even a party with legal representation within the state. When indigenous peoples have hot enough chicks, suddenly the white man goes "HOW DARE THAT SAVAGE WALK AROUND NAKED." They begin to heap moral excuses to kill the ethnic men, and take the ethnic women as booty for the lesser whites.

As far as I'm concerned, morality within the broad swathe of civilizations and cultures throughout history is so varied there simply cannot be good or evil. The mutant Apocalypse is right. The strong shall survive and the weak shall perish.

Roosh V #fundie #sexist #crackpot returnofkings.com

ELLIOT RODGER IS THE FIRST MALE FEMINIST MASS MURDERER


Since originally publishing an article describing how a male-friendly culture encouraging Elliot into self-improvement (game), legal prostitution, and foreign marriage with Southeast Asian women would have prevented his murderous rampage, I did something that most people won’t bother to do: I read his manifesto. Not even halfway through, I began to understand exactly why the media has been pushing the narrative that PUA (game) may have been the cause: Rodger was one of their own.

Here is the PDF of his manifesto (http://abclocal.go.com/three/kabc/kabc/My-Twisted-World.pdf). If you take the time to read it, you will likely come to the same conclusion I have that Elliot Rodger is in fact a feminist. In other words, the killings of six individuals stem in part because of his mainstream feminist beliefs that, after intersecting with his dark traits of narcissism, entitlement, loserdom, and hopelessness, led him to kill. The fantastical mainstream media articles you have come across trying to pin Rodger upon us is nothing more than a defensive measure to distance themselves from a killer that was a card-carrying member of their own progressive club.

1. He put pussy on the pedestal, just like feminists do
Feminist theory speaks a whole lot about equality, but it’s actually an ideology that seeks to absolve all women from their amusing but sometimes dangerous stream of mistakes. Feminism (and progressivism in general—they might as well be interchangeable terms) treat women as flawless snowflakes that must be coddled and spoon-fed happiness and validation. Any act by a woman, even if it results in failure or bodily harm (like an abortion), is an “empowering” statement of independence and strength, while any failure by men is seen upon as proof that they are out-of-touch doofuses, a fact that is readily displayed on television, movies, and advertising.

Rodger’s manifesto exactly matches this feminist belief. He shows little genuine hate towards the object of his affections—women—and their poor choices, instead lashing out against the men who were successful with those women. Feminists do the same, always ready to blame men for their failures in life, even going so far as saying that society would be better without men, who are mocked as mere “sperm donors.” In spite of the bad choices that women make by dating bad boys at the schools he attended, Rodger gave them a pussy pass and continued to believe that they were flawless angels who should be cherished, especially the blonde ones.

Rodger’s hate for those men isn’t much different than that hate displayed to me and my colleagues here at ROK. Just take a look at this supposedly professional woman having an embarrassing emotional meltdown on a news show because she didn’t agree with what I said, resorting to blatant distortion and lies about “rape culture” and other such nonsense that was unrelated to the piece she was critiquing:
https://youtu.be/g3w-5-b4mhM

Elevating women as the superior sex, which is what both feminists and Rodger have done, means that discrimination and outright hatred must be then applied to the “inferior” sex—men. It’s no surprise that the most violent killings performed by Rodger were on his three male roommates with a knife, who surely endured more suffering and pain than the cleaner executions he did on his female victims.

2. He was awash in blue pill knowledge

We have an often-used metaphor called the “red pill,” which stands for the pursuit of truth concerning human nature, no matter how painful those truths can be. The opposite of the red pill is the blue pill, of people who choose to be placated by lies describing reality. Both feminists and Rodger were firm adherents to the blue pill world—of believing in a way of nature that doesn’t actually reflect actual human behavior. For example:

Both Rodger and feminists believe that attraction should be automatic and easy instead of being based on sexual market value or other components that can be changed (such as game).
Both Rodger and feminists believe that men should be blamed for problems of society or personal relationships.
Both Rodger and feminists were deluded into having standards way beyond their level of attractiveness (e.g., fat feminist cows actually think they should be able to date a good man).
Both Rodger and feminists believe that all a man has to do to get a girlfriend is to be “nice” and a provider, a strategy that no longer works in today’s America.
Both Rodger and feminists hated players who did well with women
As final proof that Rodger was as blue pill as you can get, simply reverse all the gender references within his manifesto and pretend it was written by a woman. What you would then have before you is a pity party of a self-absorbed feminist who thinks that men are the cause of all her problems. If he lived a couple more years, I have no doubt that Rodger would even be a proud moderator of the Blue Pill subreddit.

3. He didn’t believe in self-improvement, just like feminists
In spite of all the loneliness and pain that Rodger went through, he still couldn’t be bothered to lift one finger to improve his station. Compare that to what we teach here at ROK, where we strongly advise you to start your game training with at least 100 approaches, with the expectation that you’ll probably have to do thousands during your lifetime. In Rodger’s manifesto, all 140 pages of it, he details only saying “Hi” to one girl and practically running away from fear. In other words, he did one aborted approach with zero follow-up. That’s not game anywhere in the game universe, and if he came to us saying that he has yet to get laid after putting such an half-assed attempt, we’d tell him to do 10 solid approaches the following day and stop whining like an entitled child.

The fact that Rodger was a member of PUAHate, an online community of social retards who despised game and believed only Brad Pitt and millionaires can get laid, further highlights how vehemently anti-game he was. Why wasn’t he open to improving himself? Why wasn’t he ready to expend the labor to make himself more attractive to women? For that answer, we might as well ask some feminists, who share the exact same belief as him in not having to lift a finger in making yourself more attractive to the opposite sex. Look no further than feminist’s cause-du-jour, fat acceptance, a culture of de-improvement—and frankly, de-evolution—where women gain massive amounts of weight and then flaunt their blubber on social media, ready to attack any man who dare finds their display to be unattractive or repulsive.

Fat acceptance has become so pervasive that we had to dedicate one whole week on ROK tearing it to shreds, but in spite of that, not much has changed. America continues to get fatter and feminists continue to attempt to normalize obesity as actually being beautiful, just like how Rodger tried to convince himself of the idea that having a BMW would be attractive to women.

Take a look at this quote by Rodger:

“Everyone treated me like I was invisible. No one reached out to me, no one knew I existed. I was a ghost.”

Does that ring a bell to you? It’s almost identical to the rant we recently witnessed on the Louis CK show when a morbidly obese female went on to whine and bitch about how being a fat ass is not getting her the man she wants. It’s no surprise that fatties rushed to praise Louis CK for his act of sedition against men and acceptable standards of beauty. There is almost no difference between Rodger and a modern American woman who subscribes to feminist thought.

Now take a look at this passage:
“All of the hot, beautiful girls walked around with obnoxious, tough jock-type men who partied all the time and acted crazy. They should be going for intelligent gentlemen such as myself. Women are sexually attracted to the wrong type of man.”

Let’s do a swap on the genders:

“All the handsome men walked around with blonde bimbos who don’t have a good career like me and knowledge of reality television shows. These men should be going for a strong, empowered, independent, fabulous woman such as myself. Men are sexually attracted to the wrong type of woman.”

The overlap in mindset would be comical if it didn’t result in tragedy.

Another question worth asking is this: when today’s American woman can’t find the man of her dreams, does she look in the mirror and blame herself? No, she blames men for not finding her unattractiveness attractive. This is actively promoted by feminist thinkers on the most widely read American blogs like Buzzfeed, Gawker, and Huffington Post. Rodger shared this same viewpoint. His manifesto is dripping with entitlement of why girls don’t find him to be “marvelous” just because he happens to own a fancy pair of sunglasses. Feminists and Rodger, it turns out, are like two peas in a pod.

4. He believed that men should be chivalrous and kind, like feminists do
Please don’t forward us another listicle on a feminist-friendly blog about how men need to be nice, friendly, and awkwardly consensual by applying legalese speak in the bedroom before passionate fornication. Rodger believed much of the same, thinking that you had to be a “supreme gentleman” that catered to the material and emotional whims of women, doing everything possible to please them in exchange for a sexual reward. We can only imagine how nauseatingly “gentlemanly” he would have been if he actually managed to land a date on his terms.

I have no doubt he would have agreed with just about all the mainstream bullshit advice on being a gentleman, particularly the Thought Catalog piece The 20 Rules Of Being A Modern Gentleman. There is also a Buzzfeed quiz titled How Much Of A Gentleman Are You? that Rodger would have gotten an A+ on. The end result of his loneliness (killing six people) was obviously not gentlemanly, but before that rampage he treated girls with a gentlemanly shyness, reverence, and respect that feminists would have applauded him for. Rodger and feminists believed in the exact same demeanor that men should have around women.

5. He hated game, like feminists do

No one hates game more than feminists, who have gone so far as to equate it rape ([1], [2], [3]). They absolutely despise any attempt by men to improve their value in the sexual marketplace because then that would mean fewer men to put up with their obesity, short hair, or bad attitude. Rodger believed the same, going so far as becoming an active member in the PUAHate community which dedicated the bulk of their efforts to criticizing game and its adherents like a woman’s gossip circle. (On PUAhate there had been over 100 threads criticizing me and other ROK staff.)

Would you be surprised if I were to tell you right now that Rodger and a mainstream feminist shared the same views on PUAHate and game? I hope not, because that’s exactly what I found. A popular feminist writer who has worked for Newsweek, Jezebel, Buzzfeed, and Dissident magazine, Katie JM Baker, publicly declared that PUAs (i.e. us) are actually worse than PUA Hate.

“The men that lurk in the PuaHate forums are almost worse than the PUAs themselves…”

Let that soak in for a second. Feminist rage is so deep and emotional against game that they have supported a forum with “hate” in the title that cultivated and gave comfort to a mass murderer. I gave Baker a chance to change her opinion about believing a forum of hate was less worse than men who practice game:

[Image of a Twitter Feed, Transcript:

RoK: @katiejmbaker, for the record, do you still believe that we are worse than PUAHate? Or did the recent murder Rampage change your mind?

Katie Baker: lol, what are you even talking about?]

A feminist refused to reverse her position that game practitioners are not worse than Rodger’s favorite hangout. That tells me that Rodger and Baker would get along very well in their hate for men like us who teach game and try to improve men’s lives.

6. He subscribed to The Young Turks Youtube channel, a feminist darling

This is a minor point but one worth mentioning. We don’t know how knee-deep he was into The Young Turks liberal positions, but it’s a fact that he was not a subscriber to my channel or forum. We can only speculate as to how much TYT molded his pro-feminist view.

7. He hated alpha males, just like feminists do
Whenever a feminist encounters these parts, she immediately bashes our alpha/beta concept of male sexual hierarchy. She instead spouts tired cliches that are supposed to help men in their pursuit of sexual happiness but which actually do nothing of the sort:

“People are people!”
“Just be yourself!”
“Don’t be an asshole/creep/jerk/rando!”
“Having sexual standards is, like, misogynistic!”
Of course these phrases don’t explain human mating behavior and why some men get way more women than others, but that’s no matter since feminist theory does not have the slightest intention to explain the world in an accurate or truthful manner.

Like feminists, Rodger despised alpha males, who he called “obnoxious.” Here’s some relevant quotes from his manifesto:

“I noticed that there were two groups of cool, popular kids. There were the skateboarder kids, such as Vinny Maggio, Ashton Moio, Darrel, Wes, and Alex Dib. And then there were the boys who were popular with girls, including Vincent, Robert Morgan, and [redacted]. They all seemed so confident and aggressive. I felt so intimidated by them, and I hated them for it. I hated them so much, but I had to increase my standing with them. I wanted to be friends with them.

[…]

I thought all of the cool kids were obnoxious jerks, but I tried as best as I could to hide my disgust and appear “cool” to them. They were obnoxious jerks, and yet somehow it was these boys who all of the girls flocked to.”

If Rodger was alive right now, he’d be giving feminists high fives for sharing the exact same viewpoint on sexually superior but “horrible” males who have figured out the dating game and what women actually want.

8. He shared many personality traits with your modern American feminist
Rodger might as well have been a woman, which has raised speculation if he was actually gay. He took selfies like women. He was addicted to Facebook like women. He was obsessed with his appearance. He was narcissistic, vain, and materialistic. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was also addicted to his iPhone like your standard issue American woman. Heartiste does a good job of highlighting the similarities:

“[The effeminate male, like Rodger, is an] indictment of this infantile Millennial generation, which daily provides evidence that their ranks are filled with effeminate males who, like women, expect the world to cater their needs, no questions asked, no demands made. Elliot Rodger couldn’t stand how unfaaaair girls were to date uglier men than himself, how unfair life was that his car and clothes weren’t a magnet for hot white sorority chicks, how unfair the cosmic laws were to require of him a little bit of effort if he wanted to put an end to his virginity.

Egotistic, attention starved, solipsistic, passive aggressive, perpetually aggrieved, and unwilling to change when posing as a martyr feels so damn good… there’s your new American manlet, same as your new American woman.”

Like I already mentioned, a quick find/replace gender swap on his manifesto will pass the Turing test in convincing most spectators that he was actually a 22-year-old empowered feminist who participates in “Take Back The Night” walks and thinks that posting mindless #YesAllWomen tweets on Twitter comprises her good deed of the month. Rodger was effeminate and a negative person overall simply because he possessed beliefs that are undoubtedly shared by feminists.

9. He wanted to be a social justice warrior, just like feminists
He had a victim complex of being held down by invisible forces outside of his control. Feminists also believe that the “patriarchy” is holding them down, and they flock to Tumblr to reblog facile images and memes to spread lies that men make more than women for the same work, for example. These Tumblr crusades have even led to my own family being prank called at late hours, all because my words hurt their feelings, just like Rodger’s was hurt that pretty girls didn’t find him automatically attractive.

It turns out that Rodger was a budding social justice warrior, perhaps not far from establishing his own Tumblr beachhead:

“I formed an ideology in my head of how the world should work. I was fueled both by my desire to destroy all of the injustices of the world, and to exact revenge on everyone I envy and hate. I decided that my destiny in life is to rise to power so I can impose my ideology on the world and set everything right. I was only seventeen, I have plenty of time. I thought to myself. I spent all of my time studying in my room, reading books about history, politics, and sociology, trying to learn as much as I can.

[…]

I seriously started to consider working towards writing an epic story. I was always creating stories in my mind to fuel my fantasies. Usually those stories depicted someone like myself rising to power after a life of being treated unfairly by the world.

[…]

To be angry about the injustices one faces is a sign of strength. It is a sign that one has the will to fight back against those injustices, rather than bowing down and accepting it as fate. Both my friends James and Philip seem to be the weak, accepting type; whereas I am the fighter. I will never stand to be insulted, and I will eventually have my revenge against all those who insult me, no matter how long it takes.”

Both Rodger and feminists feel the only way to get what they want out of life is not self-improvement, but attacking others they disagree with. Their shared ideology is one of destruction. We have to wonder if Rodger would have eventually participated in any feminist event like SlutWalks to right the world of fantasy injustices that prevent them from being seen as beautiful, marvelous, gentlemanly, and so on.

10. He was not far away from being the epitome of a white knight, a man that feminists collect for their friend zones

If you see a feminist in the wild, a white knight won’t be far. He’s the man who enables her false view of the world and provides her with good feels and encouragement for her social justice campaigns. While Rodger wasn’t quite a white knight in this sense, he nailed all three white knight components:

“1. He is the ever-present servant.
2. He pines silently for a single woman.
3. That woman wants little to do with him, and it shows.”

In other words, if you inserted him in feminist company, he would be the glove to their chubby bear claw fingers. His personality is wholly compatible with how feminists believe men should behave: servile and wimpy while never taking real action on their sexual desires.

Conclusion

The only things in common that Rodger had with us is that (1) he wanted sex with attractive women, and (2) he had a functional penis. That’s it. The overlap of thought and belief between Rodger and feminists, however, should convince you beyond a reasonable doubt that Rodger was in fact a feminist, even if he didn’t himself know that his peg fit snugly into the feminist hole. I’ve actually met self-described feminists who were less feminist than Rodger was.

While I stand by my argument that game would have helped Rodger, I am beginning to wonder if being a feminist was the seed that drove him to desperation and delusion, eventually leading to a tragic loss of life. This line of thought is worth pursuing by people who want to understand why a man felt that taking other lives and his own was seen as the best solution. You definitely won’t read about this conclusion in the media, which is too busy trying to toss Rodger to our side like a hot piece of coal, even though Rodger shares absolutely no similarity in thought and behavior to game practitioners.

I have logically come to the conclusion that Rodger was in fact the first male feminist mass murderer that we have seen in America. I’m afraid that if the feminist ideology contained within Rodger’s head is allowed to continue spreading, we are likely to see more violent acts by men who believe in the exact same things that feminists do.

HARVARDCRlMSON12 and Copemaxx #crackpot #sexist #conspiracy incels.co

[Serious] [MUST CLICK] INSANE DISCOVERY ON SEX HAVERS

image

TranscriptThe Chemistry of Copulins (How Women are Drugging You)

The vagina produces a thick fluid known as copulin that has actual mind control effects on a male's brain. If a man is exposed to a woman's copulins, over time she will be able to:

1) Change remove or insert memories.
2) Tell the male what he sees hears feels smells tastes.
3) Insert subconscious thoughts that will surface as "his own ideas" or behavior later
4) Plant trigger words or actions that can cause thoughts actions or sensations in the male at later dates (days weeks even months).

"Karl Grammer and Elizabeth Oberzaucher, researchers who study how the human scent influences sexual attraction, found that when women are ovulating, they produce pheromones called copulins. Copulins have a distinct smell, which Elizabeth describes as "butter that has gone bad.

When a man gets a whiff of copulins, his testosterone levels rise. As a result, he secretes androstenone, an odor that repels women who arent ovulating.

TL DR: Foids are literally brainwashing sex havers with their pussies, and Incels are the only ones free from the mind control.

Tatsuyagatari #sexist #crackpot reddit.com

While I do feel sorry for her that she died and my condolences go to her family, I personally find it hard to believe that someone as attractive as her would have autism, and I am speaking as someone who has autism myself and has friends who are autistic themselves. I mean almost, if not all attractive women don't suffer anything in their lives (I am not trying to advocate for their suffering whatsoever), so it's really shocking and disheartening that someone like her who could have lived an insanely easy life of free gifts and handsome men trying to chat with her would eventually end up committing suicide. While I feel sympathy for anyone who committed suicide, even attractive women, it's just really hard or completely impossible me to relate with attractive women in any shape or form since their lives are almost, if not always, like the polar opposite of mine (i. e., attractive women have millions of friends while I have almost none, attractive women also have loads of handsome men wanting to fall in love with them while no one asked me out).

Where are these free gifts? I see this claim over and over that women get free stuff. Where's your proof?

Attractive women can just post pictures of themselves being sexy, hot, and whatnot, open up a Patreon or OnlyFans for exclusive photos which are locked behind paywalls, and men who are desperate for her attention pay up for such locked photos. Attractive women also get to travel around the world to exotic places with 5 star hotels for free, while their boyfriends, fiancees, or husbands pay up for everything, or that travel funds are funded by online payments. I don't condemn attractive women for taking the easy route but that is almost, if not always the case. I am not saying attractive women have no talent but with such an easy option to make quick cash, in no way in nine hells would they pass up such an opportunity.

If her boyfriend/fiancé/husband doesn't have exotic 5 star hotel money, that's not going to happen.

Every beautiful woman is not going to rake in big bucks for simply appearing online. The ones who do get real money out of it have to put in some work.

With the existence of donation sites like Patreon and Only fans, things have never become easier for attractive women to make quick cash, and Instagram sponsorships have become all the more easier for them hence the reason you almost, if not never find attractive women working all those painful 9-5 jobs that pay almost jack shit in comparison. Again, not condemning attractive women for taking the easy route to money, but it's only the reality I am stating.

Autism is a mental “illness” (if it can/should really be called that), not a physical one, as you well know being diagnosed with it yourself. Even though she was high-functioning, she was probably very socially awkward despite being conventionally attractive.

I am well aware that autism manifests mentally, not physically, but at the same time, this is the first time I have ever heard of a conventionally attractive woman having autism. As far as I know, there seemed to be a negative correlation between conventional attractiveness and autism, and the only ones I know who have autism are pretty ugly.

Personality and sociability really is a big determining factor when it comes to finding a significant other; if she was awkward, didn’t make eye contact, etc. those would unfortunately be factors that would make her unattractive to a majority of the populace. She was a gorgeous young woman. That of course is true, but it further goes to show that looks rarely mean a damn thing in this world.

Well, to be fair, being attractive does have its benefits, such as more potential suitors and more free gifts. What happened to her was indeed sad as she somehow failed to attract people, even as friends, and drove herself to suicide.

Why is it hard to believe that someone attractive has autism? It’s internal.

It's hard to believe because I have never heard of an attractive woman having any form of autism whatsoever, even online. The only women I have ever heard of having autism are all unattractive, so hearing that someone as attractive as her had autism is rather shocking.

So you think it’s odd or rare solely because you haven’t observed it yet? I get that you’re autistic too, but do you see how silly that sounds?

It doesn't have to be solely through observation. It's because this is the first time I have ever heard of an attractive woman having autism. Prior to this, I have never heard of a single attractive woman having form of autism whatsoever, and that includes the online world as well.

But it is solely through your observation. I’ve never heard of a dinosaur smaller than a hummingbird before, it doesn’t make it that weird. I was just surprised.

Isn't observation solely through one's own sight? Because I haven't even heard online about any attractive women with autism (and that, by definition, wouldn't count as an observation).

Various Incels #conspiracy #crackpot #sexist incels.co

RE: [JFL] They call us moids now

Vaccines are soy and low IQ, Moid explains

(Gymcelled)
Women are incapable of creativity. They always copy men or infiltrate the communities they create.

This is cultural appropriation.

(slavcel11)
Lol. Not just incel, a moid. I think soon they will slowly shift the narrative to call any man who said something unpleasant about foids an incel or moid, effectively giving us FDS+femcels 2.0.

(turbocuckcel_7000)
THE VACCINE WILL BE SOMETHING YOU TAKE EVERY COUPLE OF MONTHS, CONFIRMED BY SEVERAL OUTLETS NOT JUST ME JFL AT NORMIE CATTLE GOING TO THE SLAUGHTER THIS WILLINGLY

Yup. No coronavirus has ever been successfully vaccinated against. They mutate too fast. Love the foid in the comments talking about how it's different from the flu because there is only one strain of COVID. There are at least 12. The one in Europe right now is different than the one in the US. Only a foid can speak with such confidence about something they know nothing about.

if you ever end up wondering how come you're living in a mass surveillance state with social credit and quarterly vaccination just to leave the house, simply look at reddit and women

(Totenkopf)

I have never seen a simp level reached in IncelTears in my life. Imagine being so pussy starved+ low IQ that you try to simp for mentally ill whores in trufemcels, while criticising the fucking original incel community, which you also belong on.

This. The thing is that the term 'moid' is a general term for all males, just like we use 'foid' for all females. So they are actively supporting a community where the foids are degrading their gender as a whole. JFL. Water is wet though. We all know these soys would repeat their foid friends in saying that all men are horrible, although they are talking about themselves.

BrendioEEE #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Experiment] What Exactly Is Losing Your Virginity?

From data I have read, personally, I think a man loses his virginity when he participates in physical sexual relations with a human being, and a female loses her virginity when she loses her sexual innocence, period, in any capacity, because whenever that happens we can correlate negative effects, but how about some hypothetical questions i'd like the answer to.

Question 1: So, obviously you can lose your virginity to a female who doesn't love you or want to be with you, whether that be pity sex, prostitution, rape, etc, but sex toys don't count as losing your virginity because it lacks sentience, or is the fact that it's not a human female? If a fleshlight/sex toy existed in the future that was a genetically cloned part of a females body, fully functioning, whether it be a mouth, a vagina, an ass, etc, but it's not actually a sentient human being, just a cloned body part kept alive and functional for sex using advanced technology, is that losing your virginity?

You would be having sex with a human females mouth/anus/vagina/breasts/etc but there would be no sentience. If the answer is no that doesn't count then let's move onto Question 2.

Question 2: Would having sex with a dead body count as losing your virginity? This is not a cloned human, this is a dead body, a real human body, does it not count because the person is not alive, and if it doesn't count because they're not alive, wouldn't a cloned body part created for sexual purposes count because it actually is alive? Or does it need to be both alive and sentient for it count, and obviously there is no sentience in a dead body.

Question 3: Does having sex with someone who is asleep/passed out/in a coma count as losing your virginity? What if they aren't dreaming and lack sentience? Such as being brain dead? If the answer is yes having sex with someone in this scenario counts, what is the difference between having sex with flesh that is unconscious that is cloned specifically for sexual purposes and having sex with someone who perhaps is passed out and there is minimal brain activity/sentience.

Question 4: Does having sex with an animal count as losing your virginity? If the answer is no, why? Is it because it is not human, or because it is not intelligent, or both? Would having sex with an intelligent animal/an animal that might have an IQ similar to the most lower ends of the human IQ spectrum, such as a dolphin, gorilla, or elephant, etc count? What about a genetically engineered animal that looks exactly like an animal, and has the genetics of an animal, but has been genetically modified to not only have an intelligence similar to ours, but be able to talk and communicate with a voice and your language?

Question 5: Does having sex with a robot/artificial intelligence count as losing your virginity? If the answer is no is it because it's not a human? Is it because it might not be as intelligent as a human? What if it was simulated intelligence and not actually real intelligence (As in an algorithim advanced enough to trick you into believing what you are talking to is intelligent but in reality it isn't), What if it was as intelligent and had a synthentic body that was almost identical to that of a human? If the answer is no this doesn't count, why would you say that when in some cases/scenarios, you may be having sex with a synthetic AI female, and might not even realize it is a synthetic AI female? If you didn't know it was a synth/robot, and genuinely thought it was a human, does that mean you lost your virginity?

What if you thought you lost your virginity in the future and posted about ascending on a future Incel forum, only to find out years later what you ascended with was actually a synthetic AI female, would you be allowed to get back on the forum, @Staff can chime in on this.

Question 6: If the reason why a robot/artificial intelligence/synth doesn't count as losing your virginity is because it is artificial and not real, what about a genetically modified/genetically engineered human/humanoid created from the ground up? This has DNA and, in some cases it may be 100% human? What would be the difference? What about a catgirl/other genetically engineered humanoids? Would they count? Would they only count if they weren't genetically modified to be open to having sex/loving anyone? What is the criteria here?

Question 7: If other intelligence life exists, such as Aliens/Demons/An intelligence species of this realm we are not aware of exists, but they are not human, and you have sex with them, does that count as losing your virginity? If the answer is yes, what would be the difference between that and having sex with an intelligent animal, or an intelligent artificial intelligence/genetically engineered species? What if we find out they we were created through genetic engineering by another species, or other beings that exist were created by a separate species/god like being?

Question 8: If you had sex in Full Dive VR, as in Virtual Reality that is neurally linked with your brain at such a level, that any simulation you experience within it will be in many cases indistinguishable and in some cases even better than reality itself, would that count as losing your virginity? If the answer is no, is it because you would likely be having sex with artificial intelligence and not other humans? Is it because you're not having sex with your own body? What if you meet an actual female in virtual reality, who is connecting to it from somewhere else on earth, and she actually has sex with you in the virtual world and it feels exactly like it would in real life, if not even better? Would that count?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I could probably come up with some other scenarios, but I think we might be regurgitating a bit and not discussing anything of worth, please I would love to discuss this further, this may be important philosophically, especially for Inceldom.

Bangkok or bust #sexist #crackpot incels.co

Foids admitting most men are not good looking enough for "shallow hookups" is an admission that SEXUAL ATTRACTION IS ABOUT LOOKS

Can't get sex from Tinder? Got ignored in college while girls fucked your drunken douche Chading Tatum lookalike roommates?

"Shallow hookups/one night stands," IT says.

OK, idiots. Here's the problem with that. You are admitting that when people want to just seek out enjoyable sex, they go for attractive people (as an aside, if looks are subjective, why didn't WE get offers for shallow hookups? Hmmmmmm).
So what does this mean? It means that enjoyable sex is about having it with someone foids find physically attractive. If it weren't, college girls and Tinder users would be looking for personality connections (or whatever stupid shit you guys think we should be striving for) when looking for enjoyable sex.
So what you are indirectly saying is that ugly or plain men like us should accept that no women will ever be SEXUALLY ATTRACTED to us, nor enjoy sex with us the way they would with men they find physically attractive Chadums. And that we should be excited about a potential passionless bourgeois relationship with a woman over 35 who used to ride the cc and is with us because we're "good for her" in the same way a health nut shoves raw spinach down his throat and says that he prefers spinach to pizza because "taste is superficial anyway."

No, thanks. We want women to think we're hot. We want them to want to rip our clothes off and have passionate sex with us. And we have no interest in the depressing "settling" alternative. There is nothing noble about settling for mediocrity. You are not successful just because you can create a facade of what you consider to be salvaged dignity and condescend to others about how you're "adulting."

---------------------------------------------------

Incel: I can't get laid because I'm ugly.
IT Becky: Just getting laid and hookups are shallow, it's nothing serious, sex means nothing sweets.
Incel: You don't even want to consider us for "shallow" hookups, but according to you, we are good for "serious" relationships. Does not make any sense.
IT Becky: Lmao where did I say we consider you for serious relationships?
Incel: Well then why are you saying hookups are shallow? Hook ups lead to relationships. How is that relevant? I am confused.
IT Becky: Dis y u inkweasel, are so toxic, that's a big turnoff for me and all my galfwends. Sought your mental problems out. Teehee.

insanus virginem & ReturnOfSaddam #sexist #crackpot incels.co

(insanus virginem)
[Discussion] Losing virginity at uncommon age

How do you go about doing it? How do you explain your date that you are in your mid 20's or even 30 and you still have not had sex yet? 19 or 20 was probably the last year it was not considered too weird but at that age it's extremely uncommon. Now imagine that you haven't even kissed a woman yet by that age when there are 12 year olds running around making out and touching each other. Telling someone that you are a KHV is extremely emasculating and a sure way for a woman to lose all respect she had for you. But you can't hide it and if you do your performace looks even worse. Now imagine that she is your coworker or in your social circle and that she will be telling everyone how you're a loser virgin. "Practicing" with prostitutes is an alternative but who wants to make out with hookers and which hooker even wants to make out with you? And why would your first time be with some ugly foid you have to pay to have sex with?

(ReturnOfSaddam)

This is my last chance.

JFL act quickly then because 19/20 is when life starts going by quick as fuck. It's true. The average person will have lived half of their perceived life by age 23 according to this: http://www.kafalas.com/Logtime.html And not only that, even if you forget about perception of time just look at your actual life activity, the shit you'll be doing. By 23 you'll almost certainly be done with college and be stuck in some boring wageslave job. Doesn't matter if it's well paying or minimum wage, it's still 8 hours chained to a fucking desk suffering. And that's if you're one of the "lucky" ones, you might not find any work. Then there's the hours spent commuting, suffering, doing boring ass chores, etc etc etc it's just comically fucking bad man. I once saw a thread on another forum titled "Life is what happens between age 0-25". It couldn't be more true.

Arthas93 #crackpot #sexist incels.co

RE: [Serious] Most of women are socially retarded and would be incels if they were men

Foids can't even deal with other foids. It's like psychopaths talking with each other. No social skill, they just lie and fake everything and wait for their pussy pass to solve the situation in their favor.

Foids say they hate talking to foids for this reason. They can't pull out the pussy card on them.

Strange really. They, sometimes, help each other. For example, if an ugly men is falsely accused of sexual harassment. All the foids will join forces and lie, just to fuck with his life. But when their interests come into conflict, they will fight. Often using beta cucks and normies as pawns.

Their eyes would "scan" the other persons face first, Isolate the Expression and then mimic it.

You are on point. High IQ. I have seen that behavior in person, it's disturbing. They look at the face of whoever is dominant in a talk and try to mimic it. Not only the facial expression, but they pretty much try to emulate the entire behavior, gestures, etc. They don't even try to play it cool, they just copy the person like a bad actor or a robot. Back in the day mentalcels would whine about how hard it is for them to fit together with the normies. And how they often try and mimic Chad/celebrity behavior because normies kept telling them to "have Confidence™". I guess it's something like that. Foids try to emulate humans because it's their chance at fitting in within the normies. But I don't know how that work between the foids themselves. Can't they tell when the other foid is mimicking them, or they don't care?

Representative-Way39 #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger i.redd.it

Advice to foids on how to take care of their vagina because they’re too dumb to figure it out on their own therefore require men to teach them

modern vaginas are just as repulsive as their bearers.. all historically depicted pussies are neat and tucked, they didn't have massive dildos or have sex with countless men. and no pedo but young prepubescent girls have roast beef, this shit only happens after they start jamming shit up there.

GIRLS when you put your tampons in do it delicately, too many of you pull the vagina to the side too roughly, OF COURSE doing that is going to cause the flaps to become worn and become loose and dangle. you fucking stupid repulsive cunts, god damn yous are so stupid, you can't even handle taking care of your vagina without men having to tell you what to do. fucking idiots.

zombie #crackpot #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Everything that girls like in a man (full list of things you can be insecure about)

-Looks
-Eye area

-Positive canthal tilt
-No scleral show
-Brow ridge
-Thick eyebrows
-No dark circles under the eyes
-Midface
-Strong cheekbones
-No nasolabial folds
-fWHR higher than 1.8
-2-to-1 chin-to-philtrum ratio
-Straight nose
-Lower third
-Straight teeth
-Wide palate
-No underbite or overbite
-Forward growth of maxilla
-Gonial angle close to 100 degrees
-Mandible as wide as the middle and upper thirds
-Clearly visible gonion
-Long ramus, preferably below the mouth
-Strong chin
-Big bones
-Height: the more the better
-Broad shoulders
-Big skull
-Big hands and feet
-Big frame
-Thick wrists
-Hair
-Not balding
-Race
-Not asian or indian
-Muscle
-Neck
-Masseter
-Chest
-Arms
-Abs
-Low bodyfat
-Clothes

-Status
-Pre-selection
-Big friend circle
-Exciting or high status profession
-Validation from others

-Money
-Finantial independence
-Car, house, etc.
-Interesting lifestyle

-Dark triad
-Narcissism (Selfishness)
-Machiavelism (Manipulative)
-Psychopathy (Lack of empathy)

-Age
-Not too young, not too old, preferably slightly older than her

HueHueBr #crackpot #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] It is virtually impossible for a normie and absolutely impossible for a foid to understand blackpill.

In this topic I will try to prove that it is absolutely pointless to discuss blackpill with normies.

For you to understand an individual's problems, the first requirement is that you have the empathy to put yourself in their shoes. And here the normies will fail miserably. Natural instincts tell them that weak individuals like us must be expelled from the group, making us capable of arousing nothing but pure hatred. Their only wish for us is to see our death.

In the case of foids, it's even worse, because, besides foids having zero empathy for any individual other than another foid, children and chads, their IQ is not enough to understand some concepts. In fact, even low IQ incels have a hard time understanding blackpill in its entirety.

The only exception to this rule is MGTOW normies, and even in their case, only after decades of indoctrination and a high enough IQ. Once they have been forced to study female behavior and all the social changes brought about by feminism, they can understand the incel phenomenon and some of them may feel genuine empathy for us.

SchrodingersDick #crackpot #sexist #homophobia #transphobia incels.co

[Blackpill] My theory on lesbianism and feminism.

(It’s kind of all over the place. Not meant to be an essay; I copy pasted what I wrote offhand in a group chat with some homies.)

Possible lesbian formula:

1: Ugly: can’t get chad, sexually unsatisfied, never experienced submission to a larger-than-life dominant man

2: High standards: only wants gigachad because she is aware of his existence. No other man can match up, doesn’t want anything less than the best she’s aware of. It would be settling but she doesn’t see it as settling. finds herself not attracted at all, so thinks she’s not attracted to men period, except for the exceptional men.. Keenly receptive to mogging. Also prob damaged from being ugly in high school. Had a bad time immediately after being thrust into the sexual market/adult social hierarchy as a low value female.. did not recover.

3: Low self awareness: doesn’t realize that her disgust of 99% of men doesn’t mean she hates men with very very few exceptions/flukes, just means she’s a normal, healthy eugenicist

I dont have any personal experience with lesbians, but I seriously doubt that if you were to put one (any girl really) in a room with a gigachad, that she wouldn’t get wet, submit, and love every second of it. “You know even though I’m a lesbian, I weirdly liked it teehee I’m quirky I had these feelings I can’t explain and I felt so safe” .. shit like that. MAYBE some robust high T lesbians wouldn’t like that.. like the masculine one in a dyke relationship..

And girls turning dyke faster and with less resistance than guys “turning” gay or coming to the conclusion that they’re gay could just be female to female dynamics being unlike male to male dynamics. Foids are ok in close proximity with eachother, sharing a mate and shit.. men in proximity with eachother are sexual competition and will kill eachother for eggs.

The default life strategy for women is to trade their looks for the best deal they can get. Whether this be through prosecution, marriage, onlyfans, dating, even applying to jobs while wearing makeup, getting promotions by being hot/putting out, etc... so the Formula for a feminist is just be ugly and unable to leverage your eggs to make it through life comfortably. Be unable to exercise the default strategy for a women because you have very little value to trade and hence can not trade it for a good enough deal.. Be unsettled by this and imagine a world with an alternate source of value for women, one in which you could be considered high value (mandatory that this value metric be malleable. Personality, career, education, sense of humor, emotional strength, etc)... And then campaign and screech for society to recognize some other, malleable, source of value for women, in which, conveniently, you would have value and power in the eyes of society and most importantly your own eyes. “Women are more than their looks” - says the ugly girl.. “men are more than their height” - says the manlet. Same principle as trannies thinking their problems will go away, they will get to live in a new world with a new, more enlightened metric of value, and they will accept themselves but only after everyone else accepts, validates, and entertains their delusions. It is expecting the non malleable to adapt to the malleable. That is not how adaptation occurs. Adaptation takes the path of least resistance.

It’s really a defensive reaction to learning an uncomfortable truth about personal value, it being non malleable, and the unequal nature of people’s value. The world being generally cruel and unlike what Disney said it would be. So the world must change and there is nobility in being on the front lines. And like kaczynski said, it’s an outlet for hostility and satisfies the need for power.

The ugly feminist will stop being a feminist if she becomes hot. She won’t believe any of it anymore and won’t care about women’s progress or w/e the fuck unless doing so conspicuously confers social status to her. Feminists don’t want to be feminists, they just want to be hot. Feminism/striving for an alternate source of value is the next best option for curing their low self esteem.

The manlet will stop saying “height doesn’t matter” if he gets taller, unless for the same reason the now hot former feminist still preaches feminism. And like the feminist, the manlet doesn’t really want height acceptance, he just wants to be tall. Advocating manlet acceptance/bluepill ideology is the next best thing for his self esteem/life outcome/sexual success.

I don’t have an explanation for hot feminists. Strictly status seeking/herd mentality/tribe acceptance, or seeking high value in both metrics, both in looks, and in malleable metrics. or the handicap principle is applied. “Teehee I’m a feminist that just so happens to be hot, And I think girls shouldn’t be judged on their looks, even though I’m judged positively on my looks.. I dont put effort into my looks (because I don’t have to) and I’m still hotter than you.. im more than just my looks, I’m beauty AND brains”. Still, I’d imagine a girl with conservative friends would assimilate their beliefs and attitudes pretty quickly. Bitches are like water.

Every fake aspect of a removed-from-reality worldview is either a convenient lie or a supporting lie to back up some other convenient lie. Most people are professional copers.

metabuxx #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[RageFuel] "Big dicks hurt me. I prefer an average sized one. TeeHee"

The fact that they know that a big dick hurts means that they have tried one before. Otherwise how would they know that it hurts. Big dicks have always been preferred by women. Every single woman has a fetish for it. If it wasn't loved by women then the question "does size matter" wouldn't even exist. The truth is that every single woman first tries a big dick and by the time she realizes that her vagina is too shallow for it, it is too late. Her hole has already been ruined by Chad's 10+ inch dick. They love the pain. But just to virtue signal they'll go on telling everyone that they prefer an average sized one. JFL.

the bigger the better applies everywhere, height, dick, frame, jaw.

Truer words were never spoken

I was just thinking about how no amount of looks, height can make up for the small dick You as a man cannot be an alpha with a small pecker. It's the worst pill. Very retable quote

Dickpill is the most brutal of all.

Thank you, so true, yet TILL THIS DAY there are dick copers on this forum, spouting shit like they don't like it too big, or size isn't everything, or just don't have micropenis. Ffs just cos a foid gets into a relationship with you and your pathetic 6 inches she ONLY wants Johnny Sins and Mandingo ffs

JFL. People who deny the dickpill are beyond retarded. Exactly. Their first preference will always be a big dick.

JohnWickCel #sexist #crackpot incels.co

I think one of the reasons that people now are so violent and confrontational now is the men women are breeding with.

I can't be the only one noticing how quick to violence the average person is now. They're willing to fight the cops, random workers at resteraunts, anyone over anything. Random workers are assualted for wrong orders. In my school they were so many arguments and fights, one kid even punched a teacher when he tried to stop one fight. I think this is partially due too women having kids with bullies and violent thugs now that they're allowed to screw whoever they want.

I agree.. it is like peer pressure but in the pretext of what pussy desires. It is like we are regressing to the Stone Age. By sexually selecting for violent characteristics, Foids are making the environment which Men act in. Foids tell Men what they want through who they go after.. they go after criminals that is what Men will turn into to get the Foids validation and sexual copulation.

We are regressing. Violent thuggish and/or stupid men are having the most kids. When's the last time we've seen a new tech creation? Where are our robots, AI, space travel? Where is our advancements?

I am looking forward to it. Americunts do not have much going on.

They'd never allow a fembot. Women would call it sexist and replacement.

360_no_cope #crackpot #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Women created incels

During evolution men and women differed. Men developed abilities like physical strength and intellectual planning (the alpha and beta characteristics, although I don't like these terms). Women developed beauty.

Perhaps women developed beauty because they thought that men would rather bring resources to a hot woman than a normal one. Who knows. I can believe that most men just want a pussy. But the thirst for beauty was strong in women, and in the end this attribute would become more devastating than we would realize.

As our dominion over the earth grew, we arrived at modern society. Now we could buy a nourishing meal for 3€ pocket change, and governments would offer actual money (welfare) to you. Due to physical dominion over the earth and the planned distribution networks of resources - men's work - physical survival was all but guaranteed.

But when men beat evolution, rather than congratulate them, or even reward them, women took a step back.

Having seemingly done away with the need to fight for survival, the women of the human race put that competition squarely back on the table, on their own accord. As if the crueller side of evolution was something to be continued, a fun game!

Hence the dating market as we know it. Hence incels.

It's like the industrial revolution never happened. The wheel was never invented. Women purposefully keep the dating market scarce like in the dark ages. That means playing with men's emotions, and COMING UP WITH EXCUSE REJECTIONS FOR COMPLETELY GOOD MEN.

Women themselves live on attention. They have accumulated so much beauty in however many thousands of years we have evolved that they can keep living off of that attention, like a guy with 1 million can live off just the interest. Positive attention gives validation. But even negative attention helps them. As the physically weaker gender attention and catcalling can make women wary, and lower their libido - which is the end goal anyway.

Women have additionally evolved (at least culturally) to be the choosers in the human dating dynamic, while men are the approachers. What this means is that if women were the approachers, and then chose to not approach 80% of the men, the incel phenomenon would be more noticeable. Now it's not visible.

HareyS #crackpot #sexist wehuntedthemammoth.com

[DISCLAIMER: Explicit, totally batshit insane analysis of the female anatomy]

Unlike a man, a woman is not fully functional without a man, a supplier of sperm-laden seminal fluid. His reproductive organs operate continually from puberty to death. Hers cannot function without sperm. Menstruation is a malfunction. The uterus and vagina aren’t there to spew bloody mucus out. A girl-woman who is not consciously aware of or intending to avoid procreation becomes most desirous of receiving semen during five of the six days preceding ovulation. She is most easily aroused during those days, peaking at about three days before ovulation.

Billowel #sexist #pedo #crackpot incels.co

A follow up to my hag thread:12 year old kids fuck while you rot.

if she is 18-20,she is already a hag.

It seems that some of us here are confused,and think that what i said is either totally untrue or happens at a much smaller rate then i made it out to be.

this is bullshit and i will explain why.

sex is man most desired activity(usually).most here will agree.Even most male friendships spend 80% of the talks contemplating sex and relationships(who fucked who,how hot a shit bitch is,going out to have 'fun' and to fuck a bitch etc etc).Everyone wants to fuck,so if they are not fucking something must be stopping them.

Roasties start their puberty sometimes at 9(most a bit later) and most man start their puberty at around 11-12.Puberty is a bitch and you want to stick your fucking dick in some hole and fuck it till you bust a nut.Girls also want to fuck(since they are in puberty),and what do they do?THEY FUCK KEK

females interact with chads and chadlites.they are not autistic.even if they were autistic,one or two guys will be low inhibition enough to talk to her and he will also want to fuck her(most guys will fuck anything).The only thing that stops a bitch from fucking a guy is her pride over wanting chad/chadlite and only chad/chadlite. .Females are filled with pride and unless they are fucking the cream of the crop,they will simply choose not to fuck.Chads and chadlites could choose not to fuck a girl unless they are a stacy,but again they are a bunch of horny dogs who would fuck anything as long as the bitch isn't extremely fat or psychically deficient.

religion,god,family,morals all things that once stopped people from being degenerates is seen as a joke,so nothing stops degeneracy from happening apart from psychical ugliness.Literally nothing in a degenerates mind makes them quiver from degeneracy apart from psychical ugliness.they are more like beasts then man.

in other words,nothing stops chads.he has the looks and if he has looks he can dip his dick inside stacies pussy and fuck her till her pussy is a puddle of precum,cum and pussy juice.

So most girls will get fucked in the 1-2 years after starting puberty.Most bitches can find a chad to fuck in that timeline.What i just said is true and you need to agree with me.

inb4 no bro my 13 year old sister just went to brad's house to play minecraft.She just loves those darn blocks

top kek

Just imagine finally getting laid at 40 with a 4/10, betabuxxing and shit, you end up having a marriage and a girl. You have bounds to her, you raise them, and then she starts puberty and starts to hate you, starts dressing like a slut and then she runs away from home to get her pussy slayed by some chad.

Imagine how it feels to have this kind of life. How can you cope? This happens a lot though, and people just act like there is no problem with that.

if he loses his virginity at 40,then that girl isn't his daughter kek.i feel pity at all the copers who think kids aren't fucking like monkeys just because they spent their teens coping with world of warcraft and jacking off to games on newgrounds,never paying attention to what is happening in their circle and never getting the chance to be in chad social circle where they are shown all the nudes of all the girls in class

I have a teen sister myself. She has a Chad boyfriend (he mogs me completely), I'm sure when she goes to his house they just play minecraft together :lul::lul::lul: - r*dditors unironically believe that... just shows how much they are disconnected from reality, they think teens don't have sex

only failed normies and ugly/crazy roasties go to reddit so obviously those bluepilled copers will deny everything i say

hopefully my new 14 year old oneitis hasn't gotten fucked yet :feelsbaton:

she has already been creampied,if she found a suitable chad.

people have this mindset because most boys aren't fucking at age 12, just 7+ men

however 80% of girls will leave middle school having at least sucked a dick if not fucked

i am not advocating for premarital sex,but most degenerates lose their virginity incredibly 'early.As i have said before 18-20 year old women are fucking hags

the church fathers are so fucking based kek.BRO THAT WAS 21421249821894219842198421894 YEARS AGO BRO.THIS IS THE MODERN WORLD BRO!WE ARE CHANGED MAN!

copers think they are going to change what is set in stone(bro everything is subjective lmao.we can change the world bro) top kek.if i did not desire the flesh of women i would just head into a monastery and forget women were even desired for their skin.life is brutal

Bluepillers actually think most kids and teens just spend their entire time playing with bionicles,watching anime and movies,and playing games till 4 am.Most bluepilled fathers unirocally think their daughter started dating at 16 when in reality her hole has been penetrated by more then 100 cocks.also are you outside or are you by a window?low inhibition if you are outside.shit even with a window open that's low inhibition.

LovingIncel #crackpot #racist #sexist #transphobia reddit.com

The 6 Steps for Escaping Inceldom

1. Start watching MTF transgender porn, then move to femboy porn, and finally move to gay porn. Make sure at least 50% of the porn you consume is black-on-white action. Do not watch any straight porn and watch porn for 4-6 hours a day - every single day. Additionally during process, the incel needs to free itself from all of it's sexual prejudices (e.g. bestiality). The goal is to become as degenerate as possible. After doing this for 2 years the incel is ready.

2. Find another incel who has completed step 1, but has not started their transition. In the future there may be a website which matches such incels. Interracial matches are encouraged and recommended. This incel will become your life partner.

3. Upon meeting discuss ALL your sexual fantasies. Masturbate together. There should be NO secrets between the 2 incels. You are now partners in crime. Be as degenerate as possible. Be nasty to everyone is society except each other.

4. This step is only necessary if one or both of the incels are overweight. Eat a lean or keto diet and do high intensity cardiac exercise till you are no longer overweight. The incel couple should encourage and support each other during this process.

5. Together, start transitioning to female. Start the estradiol and testosterone blockers. Get facial feminization surgery. These are the two most important. DO NOT GET SRS - your penis is the most important part of your relationship.

6. Kiss each other and fondle each other's feminine penis. Suck each other's feminine penis. Take turns fucking the tranny pussy of the other one. Love each other and enjoy life.

Mainländer #crackpot #psycho #sexist incels.co

I was reading some posts both on Nathan's site and on IT, it's clear how much women like being forced. They just hate liking it. Some girl on Nathan's site was talking about how much she hates being a woman and wanted to be a man instead, but she was actually high IQ enough to come to the obvious conclusion she'd just become a weak, short, punny male, so she'd better embrace her femininity and be a little bitch in bed instead. She only forgot to add that it should be only with her loving husband.

Also, before someone says something, yes, there are real women on Nathan's site. I also thought it was all LARPers but there are women writting the name of the site with lipstick on their bodies.

They love being degraded in bed by Chad only. The husband they end up marrying in the end is the betabuxx for whom they have no physical attraction, ie dead bedroom. Unless she married Chad of course.

If an ugly man degraded them forcefully, they'd feel arousal. IT foids even admitted it. Also, most women orgasm during rape. They just hate feeling that arousal for ugly men because they're disgusted by us.

Edmund_Kemper #crackpot #pedo #sexist incels.co

Theory Male high school teachers and college professors a lot slower to get remarried after divorce and are less likely to remarry

the study shows this is probably due to constant exposure to young attractive female students. and a lot of evidence shows this might be the causation

http://personal.lse.ac.uk/kanazawa/pdfs/EHB2000a.pdf

Female teenagers are attractive to most men. Get over it, IT. This is reality.

exactly IT just can't admit it because they're afraid of saying the politically incorrect truth

It would be pretty brutal to have so many teenage foids in your presence all the time. And to the ITcels reading this, get over it and accept the fact that normal men are attracted to teenage foids.

lets be honest, if there wasn't any stigma against attraction to teen foids, IT would admit it's common to be attracted to them

True. It’s only because soyciety said so. Practically any man you see will be attracted to teen foids

and they always say but muh brain development. the only reason teens have underdeveloped brain is because society infantilizes them too much

A brain of a teen is just as developed as an adult. It’s only society that keeps them stupid. As for the power imbalance argument it is also societies fault.

power imbalances actually can work. many people want a older mature person for protection and financial reasons

This is how it was in the past. The foid would settle for an older man who would financially support them and the man could have prime virgin jb pussy

the only reason teen girls are "traumatized" by sex with an older guy is because of society's extreme disapproval of their age gap

Tony and Ross Jeffries #sexist #magick #crackpot #psycho pickupguide.com

Patterns form the core of Ross Jeffries' Speed Seduction technique. Patterns are scripts of describing various wonderful states of mind and feelings to a girl, seemingly having nothing to do with you and her (for example by describing the wonderful feelings and states that music, dancing, eating strawberries and chocolate etc can create), but subconsciously getting her aroused… by what you're saying and in effect by you:) You can either link all those wonderful feelings you make her feel by what you're saying by self-pointing at appropriate times (which is what Ross Jeffries recommends), but the simple fact that you're there while she gets all those feelings and that you are the originator of them should do the job as well:).

Making her feel all those wonderful states not only means describing them to her, it also means giving her commands embedded in what you're saying to experience those states. Descriptions by themselves might not always work, she might not be paying too much attention and wander off in her thoughts, but once you've given her commands - "Feel it building... focus in on those feelings... surrender completely..." - she might first even be aroused by such commands by themselves, but she will definetly be much more attentive towards the descriptions you are about to offer.

Patterns also contain subconscious messages known as binder commands. For example, an excerpt from a pattern: "… that's the way to do it. Now, with me, its different, because…" incorporates a binder command of "DO IT! NOW! WITH ME!", which will bind all feelings and desires her arousal has created to YOU.

Once you have her attention, one of the most powerful methods of making her "feel" is using sexual metaphors. They sound innocent in the context of what you're saying, but she is bound to pick up on them and once you have her imagining all those phrases out of context… don't be surprised if she says has to go to the bathroom for a moment and you notice her seat is all wet:) A few examples of such phrases are: "Create an opening for it... feel that thought penetrate you.... you come over and over again to the same conclusion...". Now that you know what to look for, you'll find more phrases in the example patterns presented in this guide.

One rather dubious aspect of patterns is the so-called weasel phrases. For example the phrases "…these values are below me" pronounced "BLOW ME!", "…a feeling of happiness" pronounced "hap-PENIS!", "…in you're mind" pronounced "YOU'RE MINE!", "…thoughts flowing in a new direction" pronounced "NUDE ERECTION!", "...the sky is so beautiful" pronounced "THIS GUY IS SO BEAUTIFUL!" - these double-meaning pronunciations are supposed to give her subconscious messages, but the effectiveness of such attributes of patterning are slightly questionable though.

The main value of patterns remains in their ability to make a girl recall or imagine absolutely wonderful feelings and states of mind, while subconsciously linking them all to you.

SlayerSlayer #crackpot #homophobia #sexist #transphobia #wingnut incels.co

JFL THIS IS WHAT EVERY MALE FEMINIST ALLY DOES BEHIND YOUR BACK, FOIDS

THEY GET OFF, because they are humiliation fetishists. Do you really want some sick fuck, whacking off about being friendzoned as your friend? Maybe you do, but I hope you realize that men and women CANNOT be friends, and you are not a good person for enabling a pervert's fetish.

I got friendzoned on a dating app (screen shot) r/FriendzoneCucks

image

Lmao what is the point of doing something like this? Do they really believe a woman will fuck them if they write a bunch of ideological bullshit to appease her?

they have a fetish where they get off to their own masculinity being marginalized. It starts off getting dumped, friendzoned. Next thing you know you are dropping off your female bestie to CHAD's house. Next thing you know you are getting off when you meet up with her and she tells you how much better his cock is and how happy she is to have you as a FRIEND. Next thing you're a straight up faggot looking at dicks on grindr, and then becoming a tranny.

The male humiliation pipeline begins when females REJECT YOU

Not getting pussy has some serious consequences.

Total Imbecile #sexist #psycho #crackpot incels.co

[Brutal] If you are a virgin past high school you will never be able to turn a woman on

Not having your own place and being a virgin at 19 is a red flag JFL, how do people even afford to move out if you dont have any experience to get a high paying job to afford everything Its fucking over for me tbh, time to suicidemaxx Men who are virgin past their teens should just be euthanized, were just trash at this point There need to be legit death squads that go out and once you turn 18 swab your dick to test for pussie residue and if none is found you face the wall and get a .44 applied to your neck

I'll never understand how this guy claims to be blackpilled. If you want an authority to kill sexless men you belong on IT, not here. I was baited by the title. It's blackpilled but then he just has to ruin it with his homoerotic fantasy of being shot by a burly sex haver.

Virgin men are zombies, were already dead inside, youre not alive if youre a virgin past high school, you will never live no matter how hard you try to make up for it I dont know man, what is a virgin guy to do once hes like 20+, too ugly to have sex, too late to ever have any now, too big of a pussy to kill himself When animals suffer we euthanize them, why shouldnt the same apply to humans? I just dont have the guts to suicidemaxx now, I just wish someone would make that choice for me

Dude need to live a couple more years bud and try things out. He's only 19. Try being a NEET incel at 28 then you can complain about life..

Its not him thats the problem, its girls who literally want you to be a rich sex god by 19 or its a red flag Most guys who are 19 and in college still rely on their parents for financial support because its so goddamn expensive Women wouldnt know because they just get scholarships and never have to pay a cent

Pumkin #sexist #pedo #psycho #crackpot incels.co

RE: [Serious] Unpopular opinion: we have a problem with paedophilia in this community

For fuck's sake, I'm not here to go into the semantics.

What do you mean you haven't seen anyone here advocate for sex with a prepubescent individual? I saw this on the last thread:

Pumkin said:
cousin recently had a baby. sent the family a nude pic (aka child porn) of her laying on the bed completely naked. tightest and most succulent innie pussy you'd ever seen. looked as if i drew a straight line where the vagina would be. i tell you it was something else.

compare that with any 30+yo woman. would make you vomit. how big the contrast is to the disgusting meatflaps that old hags call a 'vagina'
what's even worse is how society keeps lying to the general populace to believe these lies and think that old hags are 'sexy' and to be sought after. for millinons upon millions of human civilization it was always the youngest, freshest, and RIPEST girls got fucked and married. now, in 2020, all that is illegal. we shame our forefathers with this bullshit

You hurt my feelings. I thought we were incel brothers. Et tu, PP? (btw get your facts straight. I never said id fuck the newborn. I said newborn pussy is aesthetically pleasing to the eye and looks perfect. A simple observaton from our society today. ALL women and porn want hairless with innie lips and blush of pink and red hues on the vagina. To imitate men fucking younger girls Which is what men sexually desire)

Incel Wiki #sexist #transphobia #homophobia #crackpot incels.wiki

Trans-vestigiality hypothesis

The trans-vestigiality hypothesis is similar to the homocel hypothesis and the incel transbian pipeline in that it suggests that a significant segment of the transgender population used to be incel. It suggests that inceldom may cause gender dysmorphia in some people and by extension may lead a person to consider gender transitioning. Anecdotes from incels and studies on non-human animals suggest this may be due to a desire for the transitioning incel to avoid confrontation with stronger men (or disgusted women), to deincelize, and/or simply an attempt to live life on tutorial mode (i.e. as a woman). The case studies depicted on the trannymaxxing page (see trannymaxxing) or other one's depicted below show that transitioning to female can aid in deincelization. However, some incel-turned-transgenders remain incel (or transcel) upon becoming transgender.[1]

Some incel Youtubers have referred to many cases of male to female transsexualism as "advanced inceldom". Female to male transsexualism, which occurs at a slightly lower rate than male to female transsexualism, is also often seen by people in the incelosphere as a voluntary incelizing process, and as such is highly amusing to incels.

That being said, pretending to be a female is unlikely a sexual strategy due to a very low prevalence rate of transgenderism of 0,001% (see the criticism section).

Sexual mimicry in animals

Dr Erica Todd from the University of Otago is a leading researcher in the Trans-vestigiality hypothesis in non-human animals. She calls male animals who take on female imagery to increase mating success as "sneaker males". She explains how "sneaker males" disguise themselves as females to avoid aggression from larger males, and steal mating opportunities.[2] Her work focused a lot on Bluehead Wrasse fish. She found that the "sneaker males" had genes for male sex hormones turned off making them appear feminine but also had much more sperm production and sperm quality control. The "sneaker males" had near identical brain gene expression to females and much different brain gene expression than non-sneaker-males. The "sneaker males" often also changed roles to more masculine fish as they grew larger.

Phillipines

In the Phillipines, where the women are so disgusted by the local men that they pursue relationships with American incels, many native men from the Phillipines undergo fake breast surgery in order to make enough money to survive or move out of the country.

Case studies

There have been a few case studies suggesting that trannymaxxing can actually help one to escape inceldom. See for example:

Leslie case study
Remy case study

Further case-studies

Chris-chan

Criticism and statistics

With a prevalence of only 0.001%, transgenderism is unlikely much more prevalent than mutation-selection balance would predict, hence it is unlikely an evolved sexual strategy.[3] Many transgenders appear to use the protected class status of transgenderism as a means of status ascension (transtrender), which is evidenced by the fact that most revert their sexual orientation after a while. Many show signs of deleterious mutation or adverse social environments.

These claims are corroborated by the statistics below:

About 88% of children who have gender dysphoria do not hold those beliefs when they grow older.[5]
Only 12% of boys who believe they are transsexuals still believe so when they are older.[6]
MRI scans indicate that MtF transsexuals are either men aroused by the thought of possessing female genitalia or homosexuals who want to seduce straight men.[7]
Transsexuals who undergo sex reassignment surgery are more likely to commit suicide.[9]
Only 21% of transsexuals can sucessfully pass as the opposite gender.[14]
53% of mothers of transsexual children have Borderline Personality Disorder, compared to only 6% of mothers of normal children.[15]
16% of transsexuals have been sent to jail or prison, compared to 2.7% of the general population.[16]
Gay and transgender students are half as likely to graduate high school as straight students.[17]
Transsexuals are more likely to have autism than the general population.[25]
20-40% of homeless children are transsexuals.[18]
Children raised by gay couples are twice as likely to be in poverty as children of straight married couples.[20]
“24% of lesbians and bisexual women are poor, compared with only 19% of heterosexual women.”[21]
1/3 transsexuals are being treated for mental health.[22]
85% of transsexuals show signs of psychological distress or have been recently treated for mental health.[23]
44% of transsexuals show signs of clinical depression.[24]

Pmo_addict #fundie #conspiracy #racist #sexist #quack reddit.com

Everyone who practices semen retention is amazed at all of the awesome benefits of it. For most of us it gives us a feeling that we've never felt before. But the thing is it used to be how most men felt all the time. It was the default position.All men were strong,energetic, confident, and focused. Even men who had regular sex with their wives had been practicing semen retention for years or decades before and had transmuted so many times that much of the benefits stayed with them. All that changed with the advent of porn and the hyper-sexualized society. These days most men start spilling their seed on a daily basis about as soon as they hit puberty. They never get to properly develop and become men. Not only is porn use at an alarmingly high level but sex is everywhere you look. Young women today walk around half naked. People are starting to have sex at much younger ages than they did in the past. Every time you watch tv or go to the movies you're being bombarded with sexual imagery. Men are in a constant state of sexual arousal. Israel is one of the few countries in the world where online pornography is banned unless you contact your internet provider, which makes it seemingly impossible for young men to have access to porn and thus much more of them will be practicing SR. But when the Israeli Defense Forces invaded the Palestinian city of Ramallah they took over the tv stations and broadcasted pornography through them. They did this to weaken the Palestinian men. It's no coincidence that the same group of (((people))) who control the media,banks, and governments of western countries also control the pornography industry. They're the ones who created the hyper-sexualized society of today. In order for them to keep ruling over us they need men to be in a weakened state. That's what porn, masturbation, and hyper-sexuality does to you.

Femitheist Divine #sexist thefemitheist.blogspot.com

It is a well-known fact that porn is a gateway for oppressive behavior, used to exploit women for the profit of others - women who are incapable of finding any other solution for gathering an income merely to survive. But, that is not the topic for this post. The topic for this post concerns male fantasies, young girls, and the potential for rape.

“Legal” pornography which involves women who are “of age”, or 18, is one of the most popular forms of pornography in regards to consumption. The attraction for men in this particular type of pornography is the youth of the girl, and to appease this attraction, the girl(s) in these movies and videos are forced to attempt to make themselves seem naively innocent, child-like, both externally and internally, in order to convey a sense of submissiveness to the male viewer.

[...]

It is my contention, because of this, that all men who desire this type of pornography are pedophiles and, inevitably, potentially dangerous rapists. They are drawn to the girl’s youth, and the fantasy that the girl is underage. It adds a sense of risk and taboo to the thrill. And, what is often cited, beyond sex, as the cause for rape? The desire for dominance and power. The difference between a girl at the age of 15 and a girl at the age of 18 is very minute, and men are capable of recognizing that.

I encourage any girl out there who is still dating a man to stop him from watching pornography, or, at the very least, if that is too daunting, find out what type of pornography he is often viewing. If it concerns young females and that sort of fantasy, I would suggest getting away from him as quickly as possible. Not only is he extremely depraved, sick and disgusting, but he is likely a pedophile, or has pedophilic desires, and he likely has a great potential for raping in the near future.

Bennett Lee Ross #conspiracy #crackpot bennettleeross.com

The well-known actor
And presumed Confederate sympathizer

John Wilkes Booth is supposed to have:
Snuck into the President Box at Fords Theatre
By giving a note to the Usher

While he’s packing a gun
And a large knife
And a big stick which he blocks the door to the Presidents Box

The President’s one and only guard
Is supposed to have wandered off to a nearby tavern

Booth is supposed to have shot Lincoln with a 44 caliber Derringer
A gun notorious for it’s slow speed bullets not penetrating
A gun which inflicts minimum harm

Nobody is supposed to have heard the gunshot
Though the theatre is renown for it’s great acoustics
And the President’s Box is right above the stage

Booth is supposed to stab a Senator sitting next to Lincoln
Then jump 18 feet down to the stage

And scare everyone with his knife
While quoting Brutus from Julius Caesar

Mary Todd Lincoln is supposed to have:
Waited patiently for him to finish
Then yell
He has killed the President

200 Guards are supposed to then rush in
While at the same time Booth makes his escape out

Another fanciful story
In the made-up Civil War!

Issy Dickinson #transphobia #sexist sexisreal.com

It is well known that abusers, groom everyone around them, not just their victims. This country and it’s people are being groomed to accept pseudoscience that people can change sex if they want to and that men who fetishize women are the most oppressed. Stonewall UK has been groomed by Trans Rights Activists and so have LGBTQ organizations and Pride. They have been groomed by Trans Identified Males, who identify as “lesbians” and whose greatest desire is to have sex with real lesbians, dismissing lesbians’ boundaries, in order to validate themselves.

Lesbians, in turn have been groomed, especially the really young ones, to believe that trans women are really women and that their penises, are in fact “ladydicks”, or “clits on a stick”, as they have been marketing them. These men are sexual abusers. Trans Rights Activists have groomed the country, organizations, politicians and the media, into believing that one can change sex and that a child can be “born in the wrong body”.

They have introduced paedo-culture into mainstream LGBTQ culture with the likes of drag-kids, who have been highly sexualized by and for adult men- men who identify as women. Abusers are active at Pride events, actively encouraging children to be hateful towards older lesbians, who won’t be coerced or harassed into having sex with Trans Identified Males (TIMs). They have groomed these children and young people to push away their own safeguarding protections and despise them. Women are the natural protectors of children,

Pedophiles now calling themselves, Minor Attracted Persons (MAPs) ate emerging from the shadows, where they have been lurking for decades to attach themselves to LGBTQ events and organizations, to have unchallenged access to children. We are ALL being groomed to accept these things and then wonder why there has been a huge leap in the number of teenage girls seeking gender reassignment and binding their breasts to prevent unwanted male attention. They are seeking a way out of their female, sexual oppression and lesbianism

Homophobic parents are encouraging their gender non-conforming children into sexual transition, to hide their probable homosexuality or lesbianism. They are grooming their children to “trans the gay away”, rather than have the embarrassment of a butch lesbian daughter, or an effeminate gay-boy. Most female detransitioners are lesbians! And report that they were always lesbians, but couldn’t cope with their sexuality, or their families homophobia. This upsurge of grooming the public, but in particular women, lesbians and gender non-conforming children, emanates from Queer Theory that underpins Transgender ideologies, pedophile acceptance and the male abusers it attracts.

We have all been groomed and desensitized to this abuse of children, lesbians and women. Queer Theory is ultimately a Men’s Sexual Rights movement that promotes increasingly violent, obscure and illegal sex. It is men and men who identify as women, who gain the most.-the domination of women and children. However, Trans Identified Males would have you believe that they are the most oppressed demographic in this county. In the main they are white, middle-class males, who have been raised with huge privileges overall groups in society and whose sense of entitlement is very evident. Truth is, that they are “identifying” into women’s and lesbians’ oppression. It is a case of the oppressors, claiming and appropriating oppression.

throwawayAGP123 #sexist reddit.com

"Cooties" is supposed to prevent children from forming relationships with the opposite sex at a young age that would then cause them to consider them like siblings and prevent them from possibly mating in the future. When children are put in a novel environment, like a mixed-gendered school, they feel disgusted by the opposite gender to prevent them from forming bonds that would exclude them as sexual partners in the future.

?

My working theory is that my AGP was caused by "cooties" or more accurately, a sense of disgust that was supposed to prevent me from seeing the little girl I was spending time with as a sister, so I would be able to potentially mate with her in the future. The combination of juvenile disgust and heterosexual attraction gave me a notion that if I spent time with this girl (who I was attracted to) I would become a girl, and that is something I should avoid.

?

I believe that AGP belongs in a class of fetish that is related to disgust. Coprophilia (skat fetish), podophilia (foot fetish), and acrotomophilia (amputee fetish) might also be disgust related fetishes. TiFs also report feelings of disgust as motivation to transition.

Berend D. Boer #fundie berenddeboer.net

[Intro to a website claiming to refute the Skeptic's Annotated Bible]

By chance I stumbled upon the Skeptics Annotated Bible. Obviously a lot of work has gone into this. And the website is done quite well. But I have to disagree with the premises as expounded in the preface. The first is:

"Yet few of those who believe in the Bible have actually read it."


As no proof is cited of this, and the author only quotes from his personal experience, I feel free to do the same. I grew up in a Dutch Christian family, where we actually read through the Bible year after year. Every time after a meal, three times a day, we would read a portion of the Bible, continuing where we had left before. And now, in my family, I do the same. Everyone in my church did this, as did everyone at the Christian school I attended. Currently I'm living in New Zealand and at the Church we attend people read through the entire Bible as well. My denomination is Scottish, and everyone from our churches in Scotland does the same. So it's actually not uncommon among Christians to read through the entire Bible.

The author makes another claim, namely that the clergy quote very selectively. My experience absolutely cannot support that claim, as many Bible passages the author finds troublesome in one way or another, are quoted or refered to at various times. I have to admit that this is in Churches were people are expected to know the Bible very well. In Churches where that isn't the case, quoting might be more selective, and that is quite understandable. If you are curious to know William Shakespeare, are you going to read his all his works? Or just the most well-known?

But to support my case even further consider these three things:
Many commentaries have been produced in the past, some especially targeted at laymen.
In the churches I know, pastors frequently use the Wednesday evening service to preach from a single book or a prolonged story in its entirety. They usually treat more popular items like Jacob or Joseph, Ruth or Esther, Elia or Elias, but they don't skip. They treat every single detail.
Some preachers are known for preaching through the entire Bible, every Sunday continuing where they left off. Their main reason was just to avoid being selective about the Bible, the very thing the author accuses them of. Take Luther and Calvin:
The Reformation: A Return to the Primacy of Preaching:
For 36 years then, Luther expounded the Bible in Wittenburg, first in the little chapel, and then in the great city church. He preached often: at least two times on Sunday, and usually three times a week, in the morning. And his method was to preach systematically through the Bible.
Calvin Courier Newsletter Fall 1997, Number 20:
He followed lectio continuo, preaching from the Bible one book after another, chapter by chapter, verse by verse.
Given the limited time and attention span it is understandable that most pastors don't preach through the entire Bible anymore. But I still find it regrettable. Pastors should do this more, just to avoid bias. The entire Bible is the Word of God, not just the parts that happen to be the most well-known. There might also be another reason why pastors avoid certain parts: new translations are so vivid and written in such plain newspaper-like language, that they are no longer suitable to be read in Churches where children are present. This is unlike the original Hebrew and translations like the King James, where restraint is always exercised in describing horrid situations.

The second premise I disagree with is:

But if so little of the Bible is actually used, then why isn't the rest deleted? Why aren't the repetitious passages -- which are often contradictory as well -- combined into single, consistent ones?
We currently have had two thousands years of the Bible as it is accepted by Christians. The author probably realises he isn't the first to see "contradictions". In my possession is a Dutch book, written by Johannes Polyander. I'm not aware of any English translation, but translated the title is "Apparent contradictions in the Bible explained" and was written in 1621. No doubt it is easy to find such books in the entire 2000 year history of the New Testament Church. A recent list of books that treat apparent contradictions can be found at Bible Contradictions and Other Bible difficulties

The author's `solution', deleting parts of the Bible, is wrong. As the author notes a few paragraphs below:

But to the Bible-believer the entire Bible is inspired, and has God as its author. To him each passage contains a message from God that must not be altered or deleted.
He has at least read those portions of the bible correctly! Let me quote this passage (Rev. 22:19):

And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
So I agree with him that this is not the solution. And I will set out to show that it is not a necessary solution.

Having said this, I do not believe the approach of the SAB author to reading the Bible is a-priori invalid. As a protestant I firmly believe that everyone is allowed to read the Bible. One is encouraged to examine the Bible (Acts 17:11):

These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
And you certainly don't have to be an expert in Hebrew or Greek as some people seem to have said. That's why a reliable translation has been valued always so much by protestants, up to this day. I even urge Christians to study contradictions raised by the SAB, for example at school. It might be very good for them to encounter things they cannot (easily) refute. Humility is good!

I intent to discuss all issues raised by the SAB. The SAB even encourages this ‘dialogue’ (asking for reciprocal links). I will do this by study each book in the Bible, picking a random one each time and going over the things SAB comments upon. As I'm embarking on this quest, I expect to be able to refute many of them. The ones I can't I leave to God. Faith in the Bible doesn't stand or fall with me being able to refute every apparent contradiction. As the apostle said (2 Peter 3:16):

As also in all his (Saint Paul's) epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
I just don't believe that what I don't understand is not true. I don't understand Quantum Gravity, is it therefore untrue?

It's not my goal to convince SAB followers or other atheists. It doesn't work that way. But my goal is to help those who sincerely study the Bible, and have questions about issues raised by the SAB. It's my prayer that God will bless my endeavours.

Berend Deboer #fundie berenddeboer.net

Preface

By chance I stumbled upon the Skeptics Annotated Bible. Obviously a lot of work has gone into this. And the website is done quite well. But I have to disagree with the premises as expounded in the preface. The first is:

Yet few of those who believe in the Bible have actually read it.

As no proof is cited of this, and the author only quotes from his personal experience, I feel free to do the same. I grew up in a Dutch Christian family, where we actually read through the Bible year after year. Every time after a meal, three times a day, we would read a portion of the Bible, continuing where we had left before. And now, in my family, I do the same. Everyone in my church did this, as did everyone at the Christian school I attended. Currently I'm living in New Zealand and at the Church we attend people read through the entire Bible as well. My denomination is Scottish, and everyone from our churches in Scotland does the same. So it's actually not uncommon among Christians to read through the entire Bible.

The author makes another claim, namely that the clergy quote very selectively. My experience absolutely cannot support that claim, as many Bible passages the author finds troublesome in one way or another, are quoted or refered to at various times. I have to admit that this is in Churches were people are expected to know the Bible very well. In Churches where that isn't the case, quoting might be more selective, and that is quite understandable. If you are curious to know William Shakespeare, are you going to read his all his works? Or just the most well-known?

But to support my case even further consider these three things:
1. Many commentaries have been produced in the past, some especially targeted at laymen.

2. In the churches I know, pastors frequently use the Wednesday evening service to preach from a single book or a prolonged story in its entirety. They usually treat more popular items like Jacob or Joseph, Ruth or Esther, Elia or Elias, but they don't skip. They treat every single detail.

3. Some preachers are known for preaching through the entire Bible, every Sunday continuing where they left off. Their main reason was just to avoid being selective about the Bible, the very thing the author accuses them of. Take Luther and Calvin:

The Reformation: A Return to the Primacy of Preaching:
For 36 years then, Luther expounded the Bible in Wittenburg, first in the little chapel, and then in the great city church. He preached often: at least two times on Sunday, and usually three times a week, in the morning. And his method was to preach systematically through the Bible.

Calvin Courier Newsletter Fall 1997, Number 20:
He followed lectio continuo, preaching from the Bible one book after another, chapter by chapter, verse by verse.

Given the limited time and attention span it is understandable that most pastors don't preach through the entire Bible anymore. But I still find it regrettable. Pastors should do this more, just to avoid bias. The entire Bible is the Word of God, not just the parts that happen to be the most well-known. There might also be another reason why pastors avoid certain parts: new translations are so vivid and written in such plain newspaper-like language, that they are no longer suitable to be read in Churches where children are present. This is unlike the original Hebrew and translations like the King James, where restraint is always exercised in describing horrid situations.

The second premise I disagree with is:

But if so little of the Bible is actually used, then why isn't the rest deleted? Why aren't the repetitious passages -- which are often contradictory as well -- combined into single, consistent ones?

We currently have had two thousands years of the Bible as it is accepted by Christians. The author probably realises he isn't the first to see "contradictions". In my possession is a Dutch book, written by Johannes Polyander. I'm not aware of any English translation, but translated the title is "Apparent contradictions in the Bible explained" and was written in 1621. No doubt it is easy to find such books in the entire 2000 year history of the New Testament Church. A recent list of books that treat apparent contradictions can be found at Bible Contradictions and Other Bible difficulties

The author's `solution', deleting parts of the Bible, is wrong. As the author notes a few paragraphs below:

But to the Bible-believer the entire Bible is inspired, and has God as its author. To him each passage contains a message from God that must not be altered or deleted.
He has at least read those portions of the bible correctly! Let me quote this passage (Rev. 22:19):

And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.


So I agree with him that this is not the solution. And I will set out to show that it is not a necessary solution.

Having said this, I do not believe the approach of the SAB author to reading the Bible is a-priori invalid. As a protestant I firmly believe that everyone is allowed to read the Bible. One is encouraged to examine the Bible (Acts 17:11):

These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

And you certainly don't have to be an expert in Hebrew or Greek as some people seem to have said. That's why a reliable translation has been valued always so much by protestants, up to this day. I even urge Christians to study contradictions raised by the SAB, for example at school. It might be very good for them to encounter things they cannot (easily) refute. Humility is good!

I intent to discuss all issues raised by the SAB. The SAB even encourages this ‘dialogue’ (asking for reciprocal links). I will do this by study each book in the Bible, picking a random one each time and going over the things SAB comments upon. As I'm embarking on this quest, I expect to be able to refute many of them. The ones I can't I leave to God. Faith in the Bible doesn't stand or fall with me being able to refute every apparent contradiction. As the apostle said (2 Peter 3:16):

As also in all his (Saint Paul's) epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

I just don't believe that what I don't understand is not true. I don't understand Quantum Gravity, is it therefore untrue?

It's not my goal to convince SAB followers or other atheists. It doesn't work that way. But my goal is to help those who sincerely study the Bible, and have questions about issues raised by the SAB. It's my prayer that God will bless my endeavours.

unknow #fundie bibeltemplet.net

FLYING LIZARD

Furthermore, you see something very interesting question about the flying dragon here, in that it is mentioned in a natural context, along with lions, vipers, donkeys and camels in the south (Africa).

There is nothing in this context that suggests it is a question of symbolism. Flying kites is mentioned as an equally natural and obvious feature of Africa's natural that lion, viper and camels!
So there were pterosaurs left on Earth some 700 years f.Kr when Isaiah lived. They were a widely known element in nature. Isaiah mentions them as well just in passing, without seeming particularly excited about their existence together with other well-known animals at the time.

One should thus be able to find well-preserved skeletons of these flying lizards in Africa. Presumably this was a medium-sized species.

That there was less ödlearter counted to draksläktet is also the word from the Psalms. It was used therefore generally at the time the representation of various reptile species, and of these there was a greater variety than is known today.

Rare sightings of similar animals have also occurred in our time, but they are not taken seriously. But how can you be so sure? It is understood the theory of evolution which lies in the path and ghosts here, for it would surely get further a proper thorns if you found something that casts doubt on its elongated time determinations.

The dinosaurs disappeared from the earth 65 million years ago when a comet struck in America, according to the most popular theory currently.

And since most of the world's archaeologists are just looking for what they want to find, such as confirming their own godless worldview, and which contribute to their career and continued research, they may not be as interested in finding skeletons of only a few thousand years old pterodactyl in Africa. But now they at least got a tip, if these words perchance would find their way to any of them.

Barry - Pole Choking Faggot #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Here's why Bull-Queers & Jews are a Dangerous Combination...

""
The Nazi party was founded by homosexuals. The Bratwurstgloeckl, a tavern frequented by homosexual roughnecks, is where Rohm joined the handful of sexual deviants (and occultists).

It was no coincidence that homosexuals were among those who founded the Nazi Party. In fact, the party grew out of a number of groups in Germany which were centers of homosexual activity and activism.
""

But it was not just the Nazi party Homosexuals...

Bull-Queer - Churchill met with Hitler as a young man and allegedly had Butt-Sex with him?

[link to i.imgur.com]

They were Bull-Queer, homosexual Pals.

Field Marshal Montgomery was a Homosexual.

Hitler was the Bastard Spawn of Jew-Banksters...

Hitlers Mother worked as a "Housekeeper" for a German-Jew Banker.

References to follow...

Thread: Hitler - A different perspective - Catholic Church - "Hitler Youth" = Diddle Little Boys

""
There are at least four women, including his own niece, with whom Hitler had sexual relationships, although these relationships were not normal. Both Waite and Langer suggest that his sexual encounters with women included expressions of his coprophilic perversion as well as other extremely degrading forms of masochism.

It is interesting to note that all four women attempted suicide after becoming sexually involved with Hitler.

Two succeeded.

Jewish historian by the name of Samuel Igra...

claims that Hitler:
"had been a male prostetute in Vienna at the time of his sojourn there, from 1907 to 1912, and that he practiced the same calling in Munich from 1912 to 1914"

Desmond Seward
says Hitler is listed as a homosexual in Viennese police records.

Walter Langer, that during several of those years Hitler chose to live in a Vienna flophouse known to be

inhabited by many homosexuals.

Frank Rector writes that, as a young man, Hitler was often called der schoen Adolf (the handsome Adolf) and later his looks were also to some extent helpful in gaining big-money support from Ernst Rohms circle of wealthy JEW gay friends.

A psychological profile of Hitler. His report, kept under wraps for 29 years...

Langer writes that Hitler was certainly a coprophile (a person who is sexually aroused by human excrement) and may have practiced homosexuality as an adult.

He cites the testimony of Hermann Rauschning, a former Hitler confidant who, reports that he has met two boys who claimed that they were Hitlers homosexual partners.

Hitler calls Foerster Bubi, which is a common nickname employed by homosexuals in addressing their partners [back then].

Hitler derives sexual pleasure from looking at mens bodies and associating with homosexuals.

A well-known fact is that Hitlers greatest hero was Frederick the Great, a well-known homosexual.

Hitler was closely associated with Ernst Rohm and Rudolf Hess, two homosexuals who were among the very few people with whom he used the familiar "du" in speaking.

Hitler left the prison he fretted about his friend who languished there, and spoke of him tenderly, using Austrian diminutives: Ach mein Rudy, mein Hesserl

Whenever Hitler got a present he liked or drew an architectural sketch that particularly pleased him, he would run to Hess who was known in homosexual circles as Frauline Anna as a little boy would run to his mother to show his prize to her.

One of Hitlers prized possessions was a handwritten love letter which King Ludwig II had written to a manservant.

Hitler seemed to prefer homosexual companions and coworkers. In addition to Rohm and Hess, two of his closest friends, Hitler filled key positions with known or suspected homosexuals.

Reportedly, Hitler Youth leader, Baldur Von Schirach was bisexual; Hitlers private attorney, Reich Legal Director, Minister of Justice.

Governor-General of Poland, and public gay-hater Hans Frank was said to be a homosexual;

Hitlers adjutant Wilhelm Bruckner was said to be bisexual;

Walter Funk, Reich minister of Economics [and Hitlers personal financial advisor] has frequently been called a notorious homosexual or as a jealous predessesor in Funks post, Hjalmar Schacht, contemptuously claimed, Funk was a harmless homosexual and alchoholic;

[Hitlers second in command] Hermann Goering liked to dress up in drag and wear campy make-up;

SS Chief Heinrich Himmlers pederastic proclivities [were] captured on film by Nazi film maker Walter Frenze.

Igra, states that Hitlers chauffeur and one-time personal secretary, Emile Maurice, was a homosexual.

Moreover, even more interesting is this, Julius Streicher, the notorious Jew-baiter, was originally a school teacher, but was dismissed by the Nuremberg School Authorities, following numerous charges of pederasty brought against him.

Reinhard Heydrich, was homosexual.

Richard Grunberger tells of a party given by Nazi propagandist, Joseph Goebbels, which degenerated into a homosexual orgy.

A recent biography of Albert Speer by Gitta Sereny speaks of a homo-erotic relationship.

Hitlers personal bodygaurds were almost always 100 percent homosexuals.

The Nazi party was founded by homosexuals. The Bratwurstgloeckl, a tavern frequented by homosexual roughnecks, is where Rohm joined the handful of sexual deviants (and occultists).

It was no coincidence that homosexuals were among those who founded the Nazi Party. In fact, the party grew out of a number of groups in Germany which were centers of homosexual activity and activism.

Nietzsche was dubbed the Father of National Socialism.

Nietzsche is probably more deserving of this distinction, being so labeled by Nazi luminaries Dr. Alfred Rosenberg and Dr. Frank. Others have called him the Father of Fascism. Rabidly

anti-Christian and a homosexual, Nietzsche founded the God is dead movement and contributed to the development of existentialist philosophy.

Nietzsches publisher, Peter Gast, called Nietzsche one of the fiercest anti-Christians and atheists.

Nietzsche never married, and had no known female sex partners, but went insane at age 44 from syphilis and eventually died of it. According to Sigmund Freud

and Carl Jung, Nietzsche had caught the disease at a homosexual brothel in Genoa, Italy.

The extended-arm Seig Heil salute, for example, was a ritual of the Wandervoegel (Wandering Birds or Rovers), a male youth society that became the German equivalent of the Boy Scouts.

The Wandervoegel was started in the late 1800s by a group of homosexual teenagers. Its first adult leader, Karl Fischer, called himself der Fuehrer (the Leader).

Hans Blueher, a homosexual Nazi philosopher and important early member of the Wandervoegel, incited a sensation in 1912 with the publication of The German Wandervoegel Movement as an Erotic

Phenomenon, which told how the movement had become one in which young boys could be introduced into the homosexual lifestyle.

The Wandervoegel and other youth organizations were later merged into the Hitler Youth, which itself became known among the populace as the Homo Youth because of rampant homosexuality.

Sturmabteilung (Storm Troopers, the SA) were largely the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach.

Rossbach, who historian Gruber says was a open homosexual, formed the Rossbachbund (Rossbach Brotherhood), a homosexual unit of the Freikorps (Free Corps).

Rossbach also formed a youth organization under the Rossbuchbund, calling it the SchilljugendSchill Youth).

Rossbachs staff assistant, Lieutenant Edmund Heines, a pederast and murderer, was put in charge of the Schilljugend.

Eisenhower...Churchill...Hitler...Stalin...

All played on the same team...

Jews & Bull-Queers - Verses - The World

Working together to exterminate the Christian, Protestant, Puritan, Separatist...

"
Winston Churchill was a member of the Freemasons, and a member of the Loyal Waterloo Lodge of the National Independent Order of Odd Fellows.
"

"Freemasons" a Jew controlled organization...

"Order of Odd Fellows" = Bull-Queer, Pederast...

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

Taylor Swift is a hypocrite in her music. In her vindictive song titled, “Better Than Revenge,” she is upset that someone has stole her boyfriend. The song is really a self indictment by Taylor Swift of herself. Swift's perverted sexy videos have stole the hearts of many men from another woman. Swift sings that her enemy is well-known for what she does (sex) on her mattress. Likewise, Taylor Swift is well-known for her sexually explicit music videos, which are as raunchy and as evil as the Devil. Taylor is certainly a phony actress, pretending to be a good role model for youth, while hurting teenagers and families with her sexually immoral videos.

What hypocrisy that Taylor Swift sings about taking revenge on a woman who stole her boyfriend, when in reality she is sprawling herself on the floor with her thighs open, underwear showing, bending over sensually, promiscuous as a dog in heat, wearing sadomasochistic attire and bedroom lingerie, making orgiastic facial expressions while stroking her hips in sensual ecstasy like a Hollywood call girl prostitute seducing a man in bed!!! Need I go on? I know my preaching will make a lot of people mad, because hardly anyone fears God anymore. Hardly anyone truly loves God nowadays...

William J Schnoebelen #fundie books.google.com

Photos exist of what appear to be extraordinary man-mad (at least intelligently-made structures on the moon and Mars. Well-known is the mile-square, sphinx-like "face" on the Cydonia plains of Mars. Less well-known are the perfect triangle-shape (or structure/vehicle) on the moon which showed up in a Lick Observatory photo of the Sinus Medii region of the moon AND a 1/5 mile high "sky-scraper"-like structure nicknamed "The Shard," located just southwest of the above-named triangle. The latter object was photographed by the Lunar Orbiter II probe in 1967 (2 years BEFORE Armstrong walked on the moon!). Even more amazing is a 7-mile high, one mile wide cube which seems to be made of a glass-like substance on the moon.

wokecel #sexist reddit.com

The Ballad Of Stacy and Chad

Stacy and Chad
Chad and Stace
Stacy's a "sexually free" woman
So she gets turned on by Chad spitting in her face

She rims his ass while stroking his cock
Chad loves domination and he's hard as a rock
Stacy embraces her "independence" and likes being a "sub"
She learned this lifestyle from reading "Fifty Shades of Grey" while giving her pussy a rub

Vanilla sex is for losers and ugly girls anyways
BDSM games are the only ones that Chad plays
She gets excited, Chad is going to cum
She screams "Master, please don't use lube shove it raw in my bum!"

Fr. John+ #racist occidentaldissent.com

Let’s see. The Liberal Left, largely composed of Jewish Papers, Jewish Billionaires, and Jewish moguls in the Media and Hollywood, are all for gay marriage.

Let’s see. The NAACP, started and run by Jews for almost 90% of its history, now “comes out” in favor of Gay Marriage. Does the Negro actually feel this way, or have they been conditioned by their Kosher Massas?

Let’s see. Some of the most ‘well-known’ comedians, and x-rated film stars, are- or have been- AIDS, you know… – Jewish- in fields where such facts, if well-known, could only ‘turn off’ the White lower-middle class who watch that trash, and view that porno.

Adding up the totals, you’d almost think that Jews were the premiere Kulturkampf forces in the West, and that their own sexual tastes are often perverse, insatiable, and degenerate…. nah….. They’re the chosen people, right?

That’s why they’ve been stoned, ostracized, and kicked out of every country in Europe, more than once, right? White [sic] ‘anti-semitic’ prejudice, and nothing more, right!?!?!?

Ummm….. no.

The Machine #fundie al.com

Despite an historic election last month, the University of Alabama Student Government Association is currently stalled as Senate members refuse to allow its new president to choose his own chief of staff.

SGA President Elliot Spillers garnered a record-breaking voter turnout in March to become the school's second black president, but the SGA is now at a standstill after the Senate voted down two of his appointments and tried to force through their own pick.

Spillers is also the first non-Machine candidate to hold the office since 1986 (when now-Secretary of State John Merrill won), and many at UA say the senators opposing Spillers' appointments are taking Machine orders.

A chief of staff must be confirmed before other cabinet positions are filled, per UA SGA rules, and the cabinet must be confirmed before any other legislative action.

"It makes no sense to me," Spillers said Wednesday. "These arguments are tired. They're preventing themselves from doing any work, and it's not something I condone at all. It's a nuisance."

Political parties are illegal under SGA rules, but the Machine, an underground but well-known group of traditionally white fraternities and sororities, is thought to have controlled campus institutions for decades.
Though supposedly underground, the Machine is well-known on campus and among alumni.

...

In an investigative series on the Machine during the 2011-12 school year, student newspaper The Crimson White confirmedthe Machine consists of upwards of two dozens Greek houses (in 2011, there were 28 member houses), each with a younger and an older representative who attend Machine meetings.

In their 2011 report, the CW confirmed each affiliated Greek house pay at least $850 a semester to fund the organizations, reps' bar tabs and an annual beach vacation.

In return, the group endorses candidates (primarily white males) for SGA senate and SGA executive offices and controls an impressive voting bloc.

SGA elections are not just contentious for UA students. The university's Faculty Senate frequently discussed the Machine and its influence during heated meetings in 2013 while dealing with the fallout of possible Greek tampering with a local school board election and the lack of diversity in the sorority system.

"It's not a place for the fainthearted," Thomas said in March. "Student politics at Alabama are as rigorous as student athletics. Football at Alabama is more than just children playing, there's something larger at stake. UA forecasts professional lives."

Thomas and Spillers were both successful in large part due to their relationships within the Greek system while still maintaining their independence.

"I don't care if you're [Machine] backed or not, just have freedom of thought. Think for yourselves," Spillers said. "What it comes down to, a lot of the senators are very young. And they're doing what they think is tradition, but it's just the Machine in their ear."

Sans #sexist incels.wiki

Soy points, also known as karma are worthless internet points that can be obtained on Reddit when someone “upvotes“ your post. Due to Reddit’s hive mind mentality, posting things that go with the mainstream will get you lots of soy points, while stepping out of line will cause you to lose them. Similarly, due to the cucked nature of Reddit, simply being a female (usually signified by putting “female here” before a post) will get you thousands of soy points, while saying anything about them that isn’t emphatic praise will make you lose them.

BrazilianSigma, the most well-known member of the incelphobic hate group IncelTears, has over one million soy points.

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

By now, regular readers of TomatoBubble.com and The Anti-New York Times understand very well the long litany of lies and omissions of the "official" World War II narrative. Though most of the content we have to date assembled on the subject deals with the European theater of the grand history-altering event; make no mistake -- the tsunami of lies fed to us about Imperial Japan is just as breath-taking in its moronic mendacity as the tall tales spun about the big bad "Nazis" (a term of Jewish propaganda).

There is the big lie of "the Rape of Nanking" -- a case in which a handful of unintended civilian casualties was spun by both Chinese Communists and Nationalists into a deliberate genocide of 300,000 civilians. (Read 'The Bad War')

There is the big lie of "unprovoked surprise attack" on the U.S. military base at Pearl Harbor -- a justified first strike that peace-seeking Japan was methodically maneuvered into to by FDR and the gang of demonic advisers surrounding him. (Read 'The Bad War')

There is the big lie of "the-Atom-Bombs-saved-lives-by-ending-the-war" -- spun at a time when a collapsing Japan was actually trying to surrender! (Read 'The Bad War')

Now comes a claim from, of all people, a South Korean female researcher / author that the well-known story of the Korean "comfort women" - long said to have been forced into sex-slavery by the Japanese military - is not exactly accurate. And furthermore, according to this surprisingly fair story in the Slimes, the author, Ms. Park Yu-ha, is catching all manner of hell from her fellow Koreans. (Welcome to the academic outcast club, sweetie.)

From the article:

"In February, a South Korean court ordered Ms. Park’s book, “Comfort Women of the Empire,” redacted in 34 sections where it found her guilty of defaming former comfort women with false facts. Ms. Park is also on trial on the criminal charge of defaming the aging women, widely accepted here as an inviolable symbol of Korea’s suffering under colonial rule by Japan and its need for historical justice, and she is being sued for defamation by some of the women themselves.

The women have called for Ms. Park’s expulsion from Sejong University in Seoul, where she is a professor of Japanese literature. Other researchers say she is an apologist for Japan’s war crimes. On social media, she has been vilified as a “pro-Japanese traitor.”

Ah yes! Silence the heretic! Then hang her for "treason". Nothing strikes a raw nerve like a brazen bit of truth. The violent reaction against Ms. Park is alone evidence that she has stumbled onto some inconvenient truths.

According to the "traitor" Ms. Park, the conventional story of the "comfort women" is mostly war propaganda.

Ms. Park is quoted:

“They do not want you to see other aspects of the comfort women,” the soft-spoken Ms. Park said during a recent interview at a quiet street-corner cafe run by one of her supporters. “If you do, they think you are diluting the issue, giving Japan indulgence.”

The main forbidden revelations of Ms. Park's book are:
•It was private profiteering pimps (both Korean & Japanese), not the Japanese government or military, that organized the prostitution operation that "serviced" Japanese soldiers.
•Many of the prostitutes were willing participants.
•There were also women who freely cavorted with and sometimes fell in love with Japanese soldiers.

Think about it -- Ms. Park's alternative history of the "comfort women" makes perfect sense. For if prostitution is indeed "the world's oldest profession" -- then pimping the whores out for profit has got to be the second oldest. Like flies drawn to Moochele Obongo's armpits, so too do pimps and prostitutes buzz towards a well-funded army of single men in their twenties. What is so bloody gosh-darn hard to believe about that?

ADDENDUM: After first publishing this piece, 'T.O.', a TomatoBubble / Anti-NY Times reader and veteran who was once stationed in South Korea, sent in the following testomonial about his own observation of the "comfort women".

T.O. says:

"Yes, there were many comfort women in Seoul (South Korea) while I was there in 1966-7. They weren't typically "pimped" by any organization; rather they most often were pimped by their families -- who took most of the money they made and vilified them to their siblings. Most of them turned tricks to support the rest of the family knowing that they were not allowed back into their homes. Unless they "hooked up" with a GI, many ended up committing suicide at some point since Korean men wouldn't have them for anything other than blowing a load."

Great testimony T.O. -- and thanks!

Boobus Americanus 1: I read an article in the New York Times today about some crazy Korean author. She claims that the Japanese government did not force the comfort women of World War II into sex slavery.

Boobus Americanus 2: That's ridiculous! The tragic story of the comfort women is a well-known historical fact --- just like the Holocaust.

"And just like Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy too --- you gullible #^%$#@ nitwits!"

(Well, Sugar, since you no longer believe in Santa Claus; then I he can cross you off of my his Christmas list.)

Vox Day #fundie amazon.com

[Description of the book "SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police]

Social Justice Warriors have plagued mankind for more than 150 years, but only in the last 30 years has their ideology become dominant in the West. Having invaded one institution of the cultural high ground after another, from corporations and churches to video games and government, there is nowhere that remains entirely free of their intolerant thought and speech policing. Because the SJW agenda of diversity, tolerance, inclusiveness, and equality flies in the face of both science and observable reality, SJWs relentlessly work to prevent normal people from thinking or speaking in any manner that will violate their ever-mutating Narrative. They police science, philosophy, technology, and even history in order to maintain the pretense that their agenda remains inevitable in a modern world that contradicts it on a daily basis. The book is named after the First Law of SJW: SJWs always lie. SJWS ALWAYS LIE is a useful guide to understanding, anticipating, and surviving SJW attacks from the perspective of a man who has not only survived, but thrived, after experiencing multiple attempts by Social Justice Warriors to disqualify, discredit, and disemploy him in the same manner they have successfully attacked Nobel Laureates, technology CEOs, broadcasters, sports commentators, school principals, and policemen. It analyzes well-known SJW attacks as well as the two most successful examples of resistance to the SJW Narrative, #GamerGate and Sad Puppies. Written by Vox Day, Supreme Dark Lord of the Evil Legion of Evil and three-time Hugo nominee who is described as the most hated man in science fiction by Black Gate and The Wall Street Journal, SJWS ALWAYS LIE is a powerful weapon in the cultural war against the thought police.

Dusteen J. Barber #fundie buzzfeed.com

Your headline is incorrect.

It should read, "This Sexist Cartoon Everyone Is Freaking Out About Is ***ALSO*** Fetish Porn"

There's no "actually." The label of sexist is not inaccurate.

Porn, by nature, is sexist. It isn't exclusively sexist against women, but it is *always* sexist. Someone (hopefully at least some adult consenting human, but let's not pretend that's the limit) is *always* being turned into a sex-object.

Arvinger #sexist suscipedomine.com

But why is that? Because after sexual revolution and so called "liberation" of women men have no incentives to be husbands and start family anymore. In general, men will do what it takes to get sex, and sex drive is a huge factor behind met getting married. It is well-known that the traditional (pre 1960s) mating system required men to be reliable husbands and providers in order to marry, and marriage was by large considered the only legitimate sexual release (as it should be). In other words, women and society required men to become husbands and providers in order to get sex and satiate their sex drives.

This was also a moral solution in which sex was restricted to the confines of marriage, as it should be (sure, there were patologies, but I'm talking about the system in general). Also, women married in their early 20s, giving incentives to men to work hard and become candidates for husbands and providers. Fast forward to today. "Liberated" women are not interested in marriage untill their late 20s/early 30s, spending that time at various LTRs/casual sex with whomever they like. Therefore, women no longer require men to marry them and be reliable husbands and providers in order to get sex, so men don't do it, because they don't have to - simple as that.

It has also another layer. Sexual revolution removed all shackes on female sexuality. Women can now financialy support themselves and don't need to lock down a provider husband like they did before the 1960s. All social stigma was removed from fornication, therefore women are free to select their partners solely (or at least mainly) on the basis of sexual attraction. It is well known and proved by research that due to their hypergamy majority of women are sexually attracted only to top 20-30% men (alpha males) - these men get tons of casual sex and don't need to become husbands/providers in order to achieve that.

Other 70% men (mostly betas) receive little to no female attention in their early 20s (women will settle on them only later, when they can't lock down one of the top 20-30% for marriage), therefore they also have no incentives to do work to become reliable providers and husbands. Before the 1960s an average beta male had a good shot at marrying a feminine woman early, as he was in demand as a provider. Now, with "liberated" women supporting themselves and entering the workforce, a beta provider is no longer needed (women often settle for one in their late 20s/early 30s, since there are not enough alpha males to go around, but they are not happy about it, which results in 40% divorce rate).

Add to this terribly unfair divorce laws in the US which are heavily skewed in favor of women, including no fault divorce (70% of divorces are initiated by women - women can blow up marriage for any reason any time and be sure of getting cash and prizes), child support (imputed income, in some states men can go to jail if they lose a job and can't afford child support) and you have further disincentives for men to work to be husbands, again caused by feminism. Finally, husband's authority as head of family has largely been dismantled by the aforementioned unfair divorce laws, feminist propaganda, state education, popular culture, #MeeToo, etc.

Tl;dr - men will do what women and society require them to do in order to be selected as mates. After sexual revolution, advent of feminism and decline of Christianity and its moral values in Western societies, women rejected early marriage en masse, no longer requiring men to be husbands and providers in order to get sex, so men don't do that. Also, the authority of husband and father has been completely destroyed by feminism. Feminism started all of this and remains the main driving force behind this process. All of this is well documented and covered in Christian/Catholic manosphere by such bloggers as Dalrock and Donalgraeme.

Triweekly Antifeminist #fundie triweeklyantifeminist.wordpress.com

The esteemed commentator Chinzork wrote:

For one of the first posts on this blog, I think you should debunk all of the common talking points against abolishing the AOC. The talking points get repetitive after a while, so an article debunking all of them sounds good.

Alright then, you got it. Herein is a compilation of the 15 most popular Blue Knight arguments, each argument followed by a thorough dissection thereof.

#1: Teenagers only become sexually mature after completing puberty around 16.

This is a wholly metaphysical proposition; a statement of belief. The Blue Knight starts out from the premise that a “completion of puberty” is a prerequisite for this nebulous state known as “sexual maturity,” then makes the circular argument that, because a 13-year-old has not yet completed puberty, he or she are thus sexually immature. “Sexual maturity” is an altogether arbitrary concept, and there isn’t any way to measure it or test it.

The Blue Knight makes it seem like he or she has objectively examined the issue and reached the conclusion that the age of “sexual maturity” just so happens to start when puberty is over; but there has not actually been any such objective examination of the issue – it simply has been assumed (axiomatically) that this is the case, and the whole “argument” proceeds from this unproven, arbitrary, and essentially metaphysical assumption.

The Blue Knight argument posits that 1) without “sexual maturity” sex is harmful and as such should be illegal; 2) a full completion of puberty is a prerequisite for “sexual maturity.” You may well give the following counter-argument, accepting — for the sake of discussion — the former premise, while rejecting the latter, and say thus: “children become sexually mature after completing adrenarche around the age of 9.”

Fundamentally, however, I have seen no evidence whatsoever that a “sexually immature” person is necessarily harmed (or victimized) by sexual relations merely due to being, according to whatever arbitrary definitions one uses, a “sexually immature” person. I suspect that, as a matter of fact, “sexually immature” people often enjoy sex and benefit from it even more than the so-called “sexually mature” folks. And again, the very distinction between “mature” and “immature” is altogether metaphysical in this regard, like the distinction between “pure” and “impure” or “holy” and “unholy.” It is hocus pocus; theology not-so-cleverly disguised as biology.

According to Blue Knight “morality,” an extremely fertile 15-year-old female should be prevented from sex (because “sexually immature”), while a 55-year-old female who has no ovaries left should be free do get fucked however she likes. It is very clear that such a “morality” is really an anti-morality; it is against what is biologically natural, it is against human nature specifically, it is degenerate, and it is detrimental to the interests of civilization and the TFR.

#2: The Age of Consent protects young people from doing things (sex) which they don’t really want to do.

I have seen no evidence that young people “do not really want” to have sex. On the contrary, I have seen, and keep seeing, that young people greatly desire to engage in sexual activities. That is why they engage in them. If 11-year-old Lucy is a horny little slut who enjoys giving blowjobs to all the boys in the neighborhood (many such cases), the Age of Consent does not protect her from something which she is reluctant about doing; it prevents her — by deterring men from approaching her — from doing something which she does in fact desire to do.

The Age of Consent is simply not needed. Think for a moment about young people. Do you not realize that they are just as eccentric, and can be just as wild, as older people? Why is it that when a 19-year-old chick randomly decides to have an orgy with 3 classmates after school, that is okay; but when a 12-year-old chick likewise randomly decides to do just that, oh noes, she is a “victim” of a horrible crime? We accept that each person is unique, independently of age; and we realize that there are children –not to mention young adults — who are very much into X while others are very much into Y. Why, then, should it be so “shocking” when it turns out that some children, and plenty of young teenagers, are very much into sex? Being interested in sex is arguably one of the most natural things there are, on par with being interested in food; certainly it is more natural than being interested in physics and chemistry and mathematics, right? If we accept the existence of child prodigies, children who are naturally driven to pursue all kinds of weird and special callings, why can’t we accept that there are indeed lots of children who pursue the very natural thing which is called “sex”?

Young teenagers have extremely high sex-drives, and the idea that they “do not really want sex” is contradicted every single moment. This is all the more remarkable given that we are living in a puritanical, prudish, sex-hostile, joy-killing, pedo-hysterical, infantilizing society; yet teenagers manage to overcome this intense anti-natural social programming, and do what nature commands them to do. “Child innocence” is a self-perpetuating myth, which society shoves down the throats of everyone all the time since age 0, and then uses this self-perpetuating myth which has been forcefully injected into society’s bloodstream to argue that “oh gee, young people just don’t really want to have sex.”

The entire entertainment establishment is concomitantly brainwashing children to remain in a state of arrested development aka infantilization, while conditioning the consumers of this “entertainment” to only find old women attractive. That’s one reason why I believe that we must create Male Sexualist aesthetics – we must reverse the brainwashing done to us by the entertainment complex. The television box is deliberately hiding from you the beauty and the passion of young teenage women, and is actively engineering your mind to only find older women attractive. And yet, despite there being a conspiracy by the entire society to stifle young sexuality, young sexuality lives on and thrives. Well, not really “thrives” — young sex is in decline, which conservative total dipshits blame on pornography rather than pointing the finger at themselves for propagating a climate that is extremely hostile to young sexuality — but it still goes on, to the consternation of all Puritans and Feminists everywhere.

Blue Knights claim that young teenagers are “peer-pressured into sex.” This assumes that your average teenager is asexual or close to being asexual, and thus would only engage in sexual activities if manipulated into it by his or her environment. The reality, meanwhile, is that those 12-year-old sluts who have orgies after school time (or during school time) are often as horny as a 16-year-old male. They are not being pressured into sex – they are being sexually restrained by a society that is terrified of young sexuality.

#3: Young people who have sex grow up to regret it.

First of all, when the whole of society is determined to portray young sex as a horrid thing, it is no wonder that people — especially women, who possess a herd mentality — arrive at the conclusion that they’ve been harmed by it. If young sexuality were presented in a positive light by the media-entertainment-state bureaucracy-academia complex, people would be more inclined to remember it fondly than regretfully.

The second thing is that it doesn’t even matter. People feel regret about doing all kinds of things – so what? Does that mean that for each and every case of such “regret,” society needs to go on a witch-hunt for “victimizers” in order to inflict punishments upon them? It’s time to grow the fuck up and accept the fact that people sometimes do things which later on they regret doing, and that this is an integral part of life, and that the state has no business protecting the civilians from “bad feelings.” That’s literally what this Blue Knight argument boils down to – “the state should punish men because women experience negative feelings due to their own behavior.” No, women should learn to deal with their bad fee-fees without demanding the state to find “abusers” to penalize. We are living in a totalitarian emotocracy (rule by emotions) and I’m sick of it.

Also: what is the difference between feeling regret about fucking at 13 and feeling regret about fucking at 17? Women generally feel bad about promiscuous sex (hence the phenomenon of “regret rape” false accusations), and they feel it at the age of 21 as much as at the age of 11; actually, older women may be even more regretful than young ones about sexual activity, because they’v been longer exposed to Puritan-Feminist brainwashing, and because their biological clock ticks much faster. So, according to the victimization-based morality of Blue Knights, men who sleep with 23-year-olds should also be punished. Again, the Blue Knights want men imprisoned solely due to some vague negative fee-fees felt by some women. This is emotocracy in action. No wonder that testosterone and sperm counts are in sharp decline – society is ruled by catladies, and is structured according to catlady morality.

The state simply should not protect people from the consequences of their own behavior – and here “protect” means “punish men,” and “consequences” means “vague negative fee-fees.” Our society is severely infantilized by the victimization-based morality, and infantilization is degenerate.

#4: Young sexual activity is correlated with many bad things.

That may or may not be so, but what are the implications? Generally, people who are natural risk-takers will do all kinds of things, some of which may be positive, others negative, and still others just neutral. The conservadaddy making the “correlated with bad things” argument implies that punishing men (and women) for young sex would somehow reduce those negative things supposedly correlated with young sex. That, of course, is bullshit. If a risk-taking 12-year-old decides to have an orgy with her classmates, she will remain just as much of a risk-taker whether or not her classmates or other people are punished. Depriving her of the opportunity to take “sexual risks” won’t diminish whatever other risk-taking behaviors she is prone to.

The thing about Blue Knight arguments is that they aren’t arguments at all. There is no logic in stating “young sex is correlated with X, and X is bad” and then using that to support the criminalization of young sex. This is the same logic used by pedagogues to justify pedagoguery, only in reverse: the pedagogues argue that education is correlated with intelligence (as measured by IQ tests), then use that claim to imply that education makes people smarter, and therefore everyone should undergo education. This is a wholly fallacious argument. At the risk of sounding like a spergtastic redditor goon – correlation does not imply causation. The Blue Knight argument is not an argument at all. It’s plainly illogical.

By the way, I’d say that there are plenty of negative things correlated with young sexlessness – such as growing up to be a school shooter, for instance. You’ll never hear Blue Knights discussing that.

#5: Some Statutory Rape legislation allows teenagers to have sex among themselves, and only prohibits older people from predating upon them.

This argument typifies what I call the “victimization-based morality” aka “victimology.” The people making it assume — against all the available evidence — that within any relationship between a young person and an old person, the former is necessarily victimized by the latter.

The individuals making this argument (usually you’ll hear it from women) will often tell you that it is “creepy” for older men to be interested in young women. They will pretend that young women are exclusively attracted to young men, when in reality they are attracted to men of all ages – to men as old as their father as well as to their classmates. My own life experience confirms this, as I personally, in-real-life, know of women who fucked significantly older men when they were aged 14-15. It was all passionate and voluntary and enthusiastic, believe me. And the many accounts you can find on the internet leave no doubt that it’s common for young women, pubescent and even prepubescent, to be sexually attracted to significantly older men.

It is important to stress the point that the women themselves pursue and desire those sexual relationships, because the Blue Knights have created the false impression that the entire argument for abolishing the AOC rests on our attraction to young women, an attraction which according to the Blue Knights is completely unreciprocated; whereas in reality, it is incredibly common for young women to initiate sexual relationships with men as old as their father. It takes two to tango – and the tango is quite lively indeed. Given the sexual dynamics elucidated by Heartiste, wherein women are sexually attracted to “Alphas,” it makes perfect sense that young women would be sexually attracted to older men even more-so than they are sexually attracted to their peers, since older men possess a higher social status than young ones, relatively speaking. Again, life experience confirms this.

Thus, there is no sense in punishing old men who fuck young women, unless, that is, one embraces the whole “taken advantage of” argument, an argument which relies on a denial of the biological and empirical reality on the ground, and simply defines (as an axiom) all relationships in which there is a “power imbalance” as “exploitative.” That is, there is no evidence that any “exploitation” is taking place in such relationships, and Blue Knights assume its existence because they refuse to believe that young women can be horny for older men.

Also, the Blue Knights will bring up argument #1 to “substantiate” argument #5, and argue that due to the “sexual immaturity” of the younger party, the older party must be forbidden from being in a sexual relationship with it altogether – because otherwise there may be “exploitation.” Again, the moment you realize that a 12-year-old female can be as horny as a 16-year-old male (who are, needless to say, extremely horny), the idea that the slut is prone to be “sexually exploited” by a sexual relationship with a man who is statistically likely to be high-status (and thus naturally sexually attractive to her) become absurd. And as we’ve seen, the whole “sexually immature” line is ridiculous – it has never been shown that maturity, for whatever it’s even worth, is reached at 16. In saner, de-infantilized times, 12-year-olds were considered to be mature, were treated as such, and evidently were mature. Hence my saying: “child (and teen) innocence is a self-perpetuating myth.”

#6: You only support abolishing the AOC because you’re a pervert.

A common ad hominem. Now, it is expected that possession of a naturally high sex-drive would be correlated with sexual realism (i.e. being woke about the reality of sex), because a high sex-drive individual would be much likelier than a low sex-drive individual to spend hours upon hours thinking about the subject of sex in its various and manifold aspects. But that only goes to prove that it is us, the “perverts,” who were right all along about sex – and not the catladies and the asexuals who haven’t ever thought about sex in realistic terms because they never had any incentive to do so. Our “bias” is a strength, not a weakness.

There really isn’t anything else to add here. When they accuse you of being a pervert, just agree & amplify humorously: “oh yeah, I jerk off 8 times each and every morning before getting out of bed – problem, puritan?”

#7: You only support abolishing the AOC because you are unattractive and trying to broaden your options.

Also known as “projection.” Well, actually, there also are men who make this argument and not just dried-out wrinkly femihags, so let’s address it as if a man said it. Again, this is an ad hominem that presupposes that your motivation to engage in sexual politics of the Male Sexualist variety is merely your desire to improve your personal situation in life. Now, even if it were true, that 1) wouldn’t matter, because what matters is the arguments made and not the ostensible motivation behind them; 2) there is nothing essentially wrong with trying to improve one’s situation in life – and “there are no rules in war and love.”

By the way, abolishing the AOC, by itself, is not going to get all of the incels laid over-night. There are other measures that must and will be taken to ensure sexual contentment for all of society. Abolishing the AOC is a crucial part of the program, but it’s not the single purpose of Male Sexualism, in my view. What I personally would like to see in society is maximal sexual satisfaction for everyone. There are many ways to try reaching that point.

Anyway, the point is that “you are motivated by a desire to increase your options” is not even true regarding most of the prominent Male Sexualists. Presumably. I won’t speak for anyone else, but I’m married, and very satisfied with my great wife.

14376_7
Big Beautiful Women are not for everyone, but I’m cool with it. In this scene from the Israeli film “Tikkun,” my wife — who is an actress — plays a prostitute. Sorry, Nathan Larson, I’m not sending you her nudes; this one should suffice.
As a matter of fact, as I wrote in one of the last posts on DAF, my own kind of activism would not be mentally possible for me if I were not sexually satisfied. I’m not driven by a personal sexual frustration; on the contrary, as I keep saying, what drives me is essentially a spiritual impulse, which has awoken to the extent it has as a result of getting laid.

#8: If you support the abolition of the AOC, it’s because you’re a libertine who believes in “everything goes.”

Some Male Sexualists are, unmistakably, libertines – and proud if it. However, others are faithful Muslims. The notion that opposition to the AOC must necessarily be tied to libertinism is nonsense. Look at traditional European societies 350-300 years ago – almost none had an AOC at all, yet they were hardly “libertines.”

This Blue Knight line is somewhat related to the “LGBTP” meme – they think that we are Progressives trying to advocate for pedophilia as part of a Progressive worldview. I think that it’s safe to say that no one in Male Sexualism belongs to the Progressive camp, which is the camp where Feminists and SJWs reside. That said, some versions of libertinism (sexual libertarianism?) aren’t so bad, anyway. As TheAntifeminist said in a comment at Holocaust21:

[M]y utopia as a male sexualist would be somewhere like 1970’s Sweden or Holland.

This is a legitimate view within the movement.

#9: If young people are allowed to have sex, their innocence will be ruined; sex is exclusively for adults.

Here we see the Enlightenment-spawned Romantic idealization of “childhood” as a period that, due to whatever values one attaches to it, must be preserved against encroachment and incursion from the “fallen world of adults.” This is the Romantic basis of modern-day infantilism.

It used to be understood that the purpose of “childhood” is growing up into adulthood. The so-callef ‘child’ should be made into an adult, should be given adult tasks, adult responsibilities, and — all the sooner — adult rights. Today, society does just the opposite, and infantilizes people with a historically unparalleled intensity. That’s the result of elevating “childhood” into an ideal form. No wonder that now, it’s not just teenagers who are called “children,” but people in their 20s. That’s the process of infantilization which society goes through.

As usual, conservative dipshits, addicted to their own Romantic conceptions, claim that “actually, children are not nearly infantile enough these days.” They don’t see the pervasive “kid culture” that has completely zombified kids into being basically a bunch of drooling retards; no, what the prudish-types care about is “MOAR INNOCENCE,” as usual.

Fact is, kids today are not shown anything about the real world; a whole culture of idiocy, blindness, silliness, and clownishness has been erected like walls all around them. It is the culture of the TV channels for kids, the culture of Toy-Shops, the culture of child-oriented video games. Muh “birds and bees.”

Look, I get the temptation to indulge in infantilism. In fact, I’m probably a hypocrite, because I haven’t yet begun doing anything to de-infantilize my own 19-month-old son. He, like most toddlers, also watches the stupid TV shows and has all of these damn toys all over the place. It’s not easy resisting the ways of the system. But the real problem is that society is not structured in a way that allows children to be de-infantilized. When people only get a job at 18 or at 21 or they are NEETs, and there is an age-ist Prussian School System that is mandatory and which brainwashes its prisoners to believe that “school is good,” and Feminist careerism is pushed on all potential mothers by the media-entertainment-state bureaucracy-academia complex, it’s no wonder that people are very immature nowadays. That only goes to show how radically modern society must be transformed, in my opinion.

To get back on point: “childhood” and “adulthood” are both fictional concepts. These may be useful fictions, but they are still fictions. The telos of childhood is adulthood. It’s a transitional state, and if we must choose an arbitrary age when childhood should be officially and finally over, that age should be 9. That is, if we discover that 10-year-olds behave in an infantile manner nowadays, it’s because their parents — and, crucially, society at large — have not properly de-infantilized them. It’s a wholly artificial state of affairs, rooted in Romantic delusions.

Young people should have sex, because young people should experience real life in order to become functional adults; and an integral part of real life is — and should be — the sex life. Far from constituting a “problem” for young people, sexual intercourse is one effective way for getting young people to see the broader picture of reality. Deprived of sex, ‘kids’ grow up with warped and unrealistic notions about reality, and suffer dysfunction as adults. They don’t get to learn what’s important and what’s unimportant in life when they should learn it – young. Getting laid gives you a mentally clear vision of priorities in life, gives you a clarity of mind which allows you to deeply reflect on what’s actually going on in the world. Sex is necessary for young people, whose one and only task is to — repeat after me — become adults. Sex is a fundamental part of a fulfilled adult life.

#10: Young sex leaves young people traumatized.

No, it doesn’t. The ‘trauma’ stems entirely from being repeatedly and incessantly told by Blue Knights (Puritans, Feminists, Conservadaddies, Catladies, etc.) that a horrible crime has been committed against you by a wicked individual, that you have been “taken advantage of,” “deprived of innocence,” “ruined forever,” “sexually exploited,” “abused,” and the rest of the victimological jargon. The sex itself and the relationship itself feel good, and are indeed good biologically and psychologically; they bring fulfillment to one’s life and a satisfaction for one’s fresh and burning biological needs. The whole “trauma,” such as it is, is inflicted by society on the younger party, due to society’s strict adherence to a victimization-based morality.

That’s why I call for a Moral Revolution. This is not a troll. As long as people adhere to a victimization-based morality that sees “power imbalances” as inherently and fundamentally victimizing, people won’t be able to think logically about young sexuality. The current prevailing system of social morality must be replaced with a new one. Once that is achieved, all of this “trauma” — which is inflicted by the Blue Knights on horny young people — will dissipate and evaporate altogether

Young people greatly enjoy sex, and will go to great lengths to achieve it, overcoming the very many mechanisms of sexual oppression established by Blue Knights.

#11: Young people don’t know what’s good for them, and therefore need to be protected from risky situations.

If young people don’t know what’s good for them, it’s because society itself has successfully destroyed their ability to know what’s good for them. I mean, by the age of 10, a person should have a basic idea about what life is all about. If that’s not so for most or all people, something is deeply rotten in society.

And the reason for this indeed being the modern state of affairs is exactly because the protectiveness of parents, combined with wholesale cultural infantilization, has rendered young people incapable of independent thought. Thus, instead of “MOAR PROTECTION,” young people need infinitely less of it – so that they will learn to deal with reality.

And at any rate, sex is not as risky as the Blue Knights claim it is. They scare people about STDs, but then the solutions to that problem are well-known, and are completely independent of age – if instructed properly, and possessing a responsible personality, a 10-year-old can behave just as carefully — if not much more carefully — than many 40-year-olds.

Then there is the issue of pregnancy. First of all, what I wrote in the above paragraph about responsiblity applies here as well – the pregnancy-avoidance methods are well known. Secondly however, there’s a great differences in here: pregnancy is not a disease. It’s not a bad thing, but a good thing. I support young pregnancy and young parenthood. That is the primary “risk” which Blue Knight scare-mongers warn about, and I don’t see it as a risk at all. Instead of being protected from reproduction, people need to be instructed about how to reproduce. I once wrote, trollishly as usual, that if there should be any schools at all, then the “homework” of young females should be getting impregnated. The essence beneath the statement is on-point: pregnancy is good, because reproduction is good; fertility is good, while sterility is bad.

So, in my view, young people should not be protected from the “risk” of pregnancy. They should be instructed about it, made to comprehend the how’s and why’s of it, and then allowed to use their mind-faculties to figure-out what should or should not be done. That’s the gist of any de-infantilization program.

#12: Young people don’t desire to have sex.

Young people do, as a matter of actual fact, very much desire to have sex; much more-so, even, than many old people.

#13: If the AOC is abolished, parents will no longer be able to control their children.

What is the purpose — the very raison d’etre — of parental control over children? To turn children into functional adults, so as to allow them to form families and continue the bloodline. This cannot be achieved by hindering the ability of children (or “children”) to engage in the one thing that marks the arrival of maturity – sexual activity. Sexual activity is the thing that most unequivocally transforms an un-developed person into a developed person. Since the purpose of parenthood is the creation of adults, parenthood should serve to (at the very least) give-way in face of the natural maturation of children, rather than artificially prolonging “childhood” in order to extend the period of parental control. Parental control is only good insofar as it allows parents to facilitate the de-infantilization of their children; when, as in our deplorable times, parental control is used to exacerbate the infantilization of children, it is in the interest of society to tell parents to fuck off.

Since parents these days abuse their parental power and authority by artificially prolonging the infantilization of their own children, the abolition of the anti-natural AOC is exactly a thing that is needed in order to put parental control in check. The power of parents vis-a-vis their children must be drastically reduced when the child reaches the age of 8. That’s usually the age when sex, reproduction, and marriage all become relevant. If you want to argue that 8 is still too young, perhaps (maybe) we can compromise on 10. Point is, between 8 and 10, parental power should be dramatically restricted.

As a 23-year-old father, I can tell you that parents and family in general continue to significantly shape your life long after you cease being under “parental control.” An abolition of the AOC won’t result in all teenagers running away from home never to be seen again. But it will, God willing, result in the establishment of many new young households. That is something that we should strive for – getting teenagers to form families. That is the meaning of creating adults.

#14: Without an AOC, there will be grey-zone situations of child prostitution.

Child prostitution should be legal.

#15: Abolishing the AOC will increase pre-marital sex, which is a bad thing.

First of all, I couldn’t care less about whether or not sex is “pre-marital.” I had fucked my wife and impregnated her before we were married; so what? What matters is the bottom line: the creation of a patriarchal and stable household.

The second thing is, people today marry extremely late, and many forgo marriage altogether. This is related to the war against young sexuality: not reproducing when young, people struggle to reproduce when old; and living in sexlessness until the late teens or early twenies (or until later than that), a total sexual dysfunction takes over society, and people find it difficult to form long-lasting relationships at all. Young love shines the brightest, the younger the love, the brighter it shines; couples who start young last longer than those who start old.

Puritanical Blue Knights have brought about the plummeting of the TFR in Western Society. In my view, pre-marital sex should be accepted, as long as everyone involved understands that the purpose of any “romance” is the formation of a household. Early teenage marriage should be encouraged, and if early teenage sexual intercourse facilitates that, so be it – it’s all the better. It is not sex that is harmful to young people; sex is good for them. It is sexlessness that is the central and overarching problem of our times.

In conclusion
Man, that was exhausting, I gotta say. But hopefully, this post will serve as a guide to answering Blue Knight talking points. All of you must remember this: before you can annihilate Blue Knightism, you must mentally internalize what it is that we Male Sexualists believe in. In moments of uncertainty and doubt, consult this post, and you may find the core idea needed for you in order to formulate your own Male Sexualist position about any given issue.

There is a new revolution on the horizon. I don’t know how long I personally have left in this world. Perhaps the intelligence operatives threatening me will decide against killing me, or maybe they’ll slay me this very night. Who knows. What I want you to do is to take the ideas provided on DAF and now on TAF, understand them, and spread them. This is not a cult of personality or a money-making scheme. This is a political movement that has its own ideas, ideas that may initially appear groundbreaking but which in reality may also be primordial, ideas which we hope will be implemented in reality – be it 30, 80, or 360 years from now. At some point in the future, somewhere on the face of our planet, there will be a Male Sexualist country.

If during the next half-decade we manage to bring into the fold both edgy 4channers and 8channers (“meme lords”), and serious, intelligent, competent, affluent, deep-thinking, and strategizing supporters, we will be able within several decades to achieve our political objective.

UserN-me #sexist reddit.com

Types of Chads (a guide)

Note* the following post is only my opinion and meant for entertainment purposes only. Please do not get triggered if you meet any of the following descriptions. After all, It's good to be king.

Chad and the concept of Chads is heavily referenced here in this forum. I've decided to put together a little list of the various Chad types. Chads come in all forms but essentially the commonality is that Chads are typically young men (high school to college age, 20s, etc) and they have incredible success with women sexually or romantically. Here we go...

•The "Jock"

This one is a classic, he's been around since day one. Commonly called the "Alpha male", he is large and strong. Very athletic, he is often more concerned with his athletic success as much or sometimes even more than his sexual success. He is often preoccupied with the "big game" and he can be a bully or the "all American" church-going nice guy. The elders are very impressed with this one and admire him like a prize winning stallion, "he'll take us all the way to national champions!". This guy may end up in the military or going to a good "state" college while landing a high paying executive career later in life if he can't make it "pro". MVP for the ladies.

•Disco/Club Chad

This Chad is all about clubbing, enjoys wearing either tight fit, dark colored shirts or button up shirts with a large collar, unbuttoned to the chest, with large folded-back cuffs, typically lighter in color with a nice pattern. Good hair is a must and often uses cologne. Dew is usually slicked back with a heavy use of creams and lotions. Recreational drugs are a hobby of his. May or may not come equipped with jewelry, he's often a large fan exotic cars and flashy materials, and wearing sunglasses at night. When he's not busy trying to acquire Stacy at night he spends his afternoons in the gym. He likes to sleep in.

•Smart "metrosexual" Chad

This Chad is a handsome fella but not in an overtly masculine way. Typically wears glasses and dresses well, sport coats, etc. he's a yuppie, educated in ivy league schools. He enjoys Apple products and he can be found at coffee shops and loves Starbucks. He tends to "do very well", this one grooms himself very well and has his hair slick also. Catch him on Wall-Street. "Do you like Huey Lewis and the News?..."

•Goth Chad

He's mysterious and dark. The only Chad that wears eyeliner or "real" makeup. Think of "the crow". He enjoys music, mostly dark or metal. He enjoys black lights and playing electric guitar. Sometimes he enjoys a hybrid of this and electro music. His hair is either dark brown or dyed black perhaps with a bright color highlight, often natural or "disheveled". Might be a recreational drug user but not always, he may or may not smoke. Wears A LOT of black. Talks often about "sorrow". Similar to the "artist Chad" but more depressive. "I'm a nonconformist"

•The "Cowboy"/country Chad

He's a happy and yet a "simple" Chad. He's often referred to as a hillbilly, or the derogatory "redneck". A social conservative, he enjoys country music and is fit and tall. He might be more cowboy in appearance with a cowboy hat and a large belt buckle on occasion but more often this kind is found wearing a old dirty ball cap, typically a green "John Deere" with a "fishnet" back and some form of work boots with jeans and plaid shirt. He's a "gettin' dirty" working fella. If you spot his ass you'll see a circular stain in his back pocket from his can of dip. He's a big fan of the military, is very patriotic, a frequent attendee of church and a big fan of guns. Watch out ladies...this one spits. She can't wait ride this mustang.

•The "cute" geek/gamer Chad

This is the cute, younger looking Chad. A nice guy. Not overtly masculine but girls can't resist him he's just too attractive. He's really into video gaming and doesn't mind the "geeky" games that other Chads often avoid. He's computer savy and is popular on social media. This one enjoys wearing long sleeve "t-shirts" with short sleeved t-shirts on top. He's familiar with and enjoys anime. Unlike his less attractive colleagues he enjoys recreational sports like bike riding and often wears "live strong " bracelets. Women aren't usually attracted to these "gamer" types but this Chad is too honest and beautiful they can't help it. He's got fast fingers...the girls love that, I'm not sure why.

•Hip hop/"Thug" Chad

Often bullies, they are similar to the "bad boy" Chad. These guys look like they've been to prison but have never seen it. They embrace "urban black" culture to include rap and hip hop, and can be of any race and are usually found in the suburbs. They display tattoos, and usually a flashy large necklace. Often wear loose Ts or wife beaters, and untied timberlands. To top this cherry fella off, he has a ball cap of his favorite team. Unlike cowboy Chad, his cap is pristine, flat brim, with original flashy manufacturer's sticker. Walks with a limp, doesn't say "hi" but gives customary single head "nod". Ay Yo...Careful he might be dangerous. Don't bother asking this Chad to "pull your damn pants up". From the windows to the walls until the sweat runs down his...

•The Bully/"Bad Boy" Chad

This champ is also a classic. Yup, the greaser, the bully. He smokes, slicks his hair back. He usually has a cigarette tucked in his ear or a pack rolled up in his sleeve. Enjoys working on things and gambling. He can be a heavy drinker and drug user. He typically works on his car. Usually a truck, or some sort of muscle car. Often you hear the girls cry about how much of a jerk he is but if only we knew deep down, he's a great guy. "Give me your lunch money you pussy!"

•The "artist" Chad

The most sensitive of the Chads. He has beautiful long locks, enjoys large loose sweaters or flannel shirts, and plays acoustic guitar and is a "song writer". He might write poetry, and he may also paint. He can also be found in coffee shops but usually there to perform. He's a sensitive guy but that doesn't stop women from chasing him or his cousin, drama-club Chad, they love his "sensitive" side and he's so talented! Gayer or John Mayer, he's a pussy slayer.

You'll often find hybrid-Chads of these.

Feel free to add your own.

various incels #sexist reddit.com

(FlowerEmperor)
Chad friend told me about how he pisses on girls in the shower

He said he pisses on girls while they're showering together to see how much he can get away with. Apparently his current girlfriend expressed annoyance at it at first but then stopped showing a reaction. He also bragged about pissing unnanounced on other girls in the past. This guy has women all over him and hooks up left right and centre even when he has a girlfriend.
REMEMBER: You are incel because you don't respect women.

(spiritplumber)
Pee on him, establish dominance.

(RapeAFeminist4Jesus)
Chad
shower

.
.
.

Checks out.

(hot_young_dude)
Obviously he realises the worth of modern females, just like a lot of other Chads do. It seems normies are usually the most delusional. Let's look on the bright side: at least someone pisses on these whores.

(HomoheroBishii)
Females consider it an honor to be pissed on unannounced by Chad. Whatever it takes to keep him around for one more minute. It also turns the submissive ones on (which is most women when they're around Chad).
An ugly beta smiling at them is considered an insult and should be illegal.

(incelwarrior95)
chad gets way with anything

(fart_fetish)
Maybe if Chad pees on me I will become attractive

(LynchingTriHards)
GEEEEEEEEEE I WONDER WHYYYYYYYY I DON'T HAVE ANY GIRLS EVEN THOUGH I TOOK A SHOWER JUST THEN??????
WELL NORMFAGS??????

(BrigandEileen)
In other news, stare rape needs to stop.

(NutNotBusted)
Golden showers are a must for femaloids, they love being degraded by Chad

(King69Alex)
Just marking my territory.

(mysterixx)
Chads are narcissistic assholes and they will anything just because they can do. I know many of them beating women and still get away with it.

(MarriedAndLookin4Fun)
Who else pisses on themselves while showering?
Only me? Okay

(pepefrog100)
Pee on my bum bum chadley

(dindu_nuffin_dontBan)
I've done this too it's hilarious.

(Donewithitall7766)
Someone please make a weaponized blackpill tinder account with golden shower fetish and show these femaloids they only care about face and no regard for levels of degeneracy when it comes to Chad.

(Bojack101)
Ultimate blakcpill

(Mest666)
pic?

Incel Wiki #sexist wiki.incels.info

Pussy cartel

The pussy cartel refers to women's artifically inflating the value of sex via price-fixing.

Sex is worth maybe $5 of women's time and effort. But women know men will go insane without sex, so they collectively deny it to men. They force (non-attractive) men to invest hundreds if not thousands of dollars in time, gifts, dinners, just for the possibility that they will get sex.

Effects of prostitution on sex prices

• Men would be less easily manipulated by sex. If men could simply pay for sex instead of having to win a girl's affection, then the average woman would have much less sexual control over the average man.
• The value of sex would go down. Men are less severely incel in societies where prostitutes are legal, so prostitutes charge less. Low quality escorts cost hundreds of dollars in countries like the US where prostitution is illegal. This is outrageous price for something that costs the woman nothing and requires no skill. In countries where Germany where prostitution is legal, prices are much lower. "Bulgarian and Romanian women sometimes charge less than €10 [$13]," she says. "One woman here will even do it for a Big Mac."[1]

TheMostAncientcel Recruit #psycho #sexist incels.co

Not hating women and chads = Cuckold

And I mean literal Cuckold fetish. Imagine entering a room (maybe for mistake) and seeing the scene of Becky being brutally pounded by Chad Gigacok. Immagine seing this brutality and thinking to yourself : "well it's not their fault, it's nature after all" . Seeing that scene should ignite deep ferocious hatred in every incel with a bit of self esteem. You should totally lose it and start stabbing both of them with a rusty sword in minecraft. You should come to your sense only when the room in minecraft is a bloody mess.

"But they have no fauuult it's supposed to be like thiiiis" says the soycel cuck.Yes and you know what? Even an antilope is following its nature when it runs away from the lion. Should the lion not become ferocious and bloodthirsty just at the sight of the antilope escaping?If it is "natural" for the antilope to escape it is natural for the lion turning itself into a merciless killing machine.

And if it is natural for Chad and his harem to fuck 24/7 while laughing at us it is natural to us incels wanting to killing Chad in minecraft and rape Stacy in Dragon Quest Builders. It is our biological imperative and the only way to eliminate your rivals and finally passing your genes into the next generation.

WHEN YOU DON'T HATE CHAD AND FOIDS YOU ARE BASICALLY ADMITTING THAT YOUR DNA DESERVES TO DIE WHILE CHAD HAS THE DUTY OF IMPREGNATING WOMEN WHO WOULD FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE JUST AT LOOKING YOUR FACE.

It is basically cuckold porn on epic proportions. Have some fucking pride and let your soul burn in an endless inferno of bitterness, hatred and malignity.

incellius #sexist reddit.com

Blackpill: femoids are extremely aroused by the idea of getting raped by a Chad.

There's nothing more arousing to a femoid than a Chad violently raping them. In their mind, Chad found them so irresistible and attractive that he LOST control over his actions and forced himself onto her. This is the ultimate compliment to femoids- Chad is willing to go to PRISON (i.e. lose his freedom) just to fuck her miserable pussy/anus for a short while.

That's why they get shitfaced at parties and put themselves in vulnerable situations where Chads are present. They want to signal to him that they're ready to get fucked. They don't want sex, they want to GET fucked and be stuck in a helpless situation. It makes them wet. Would femoids get very drunk at places where only incels/normies hang out? That's very unlikely. However if Chad's on the scene, she can roll around on the floor vomiting alcohol with her ass cheeks out. Besides, femoids love the idea of being impregnated with Chad's superior sperm. The take pleasure in the fact that their offspring will not be some deformed incel or even normie. Their offspring will look just like their father.

Silas Reynolds #fundie therightstuff.biz

[From "A Current Year™ Listicle: The “They Had It Coming” Catalogue"]

Steve Otter is now dead. In a delicious bit of irony, the White communist and anti-apartheid activist was murdered by vibrant home invaders on December 16th (Reconciliation Day in South Africa). Naturally, the powers that be in the failed state of South Africa are both deeply concerned, but also in a state of profound grief. South Africa’s minister of culture, Nathi Mthethwa, delivered a sorrowful statement on the late anti-White agitator’s fate, “We are devastated and outraged to learn about the fatal attack which claimed the life of author and former journalist Steven Otter.”

[...]

But, in my honest opinion, Steve Otter sounds like he had it coming – if you catch my meaning. That’s not a clarion call for any would-be warriors to begin physical removal, but rather a sense of smug satisfaction in shitlibs (or I call them socialist-slash-communists because that’s what they are) and anti-White agitators receiving their just deserts.

It’s our Current Year™ now. The Old Right is in shambles and the Left has lost over a 1,000 legislative seats under President High Yeller. Purple haired and gender fluid SJWs are bravely and literally shaking from fear. Hate trumps love in the Current Year™ and any minute Vice President Pence will institute widespread and enforced electro-shock conversion therapy – starting with San Francisco. That being said, it’s worthwhile to dive into the (non-retconned) history books and celebrate a commie’s comeuppance on occasion.

Below is a Current Year™ listicle on now lionized, but thoroughly perverted Marxists and, occasionally and coincidentally Jewish, subversives that said sayonara.

5. This Machine Kills Fascists…Not Really.
http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2017/01/Victor-Jara.jpg
Víctor Jara
– was supposed to be Chile’s next Woody (or Arlo) Guthrie (it doesn’t matter though, they were both equally shitbags anyway). He was a Chilean teacher, theatre director, lovesick poet, singer-songwriter and political hack. As we all know, Chile experienced something akin to a miracle in the early 1970s with the rise of Augusto Pinochet – a man with a penchant for sunglasses and physically removing communists via helicopter rides, along with his elite death squad called the “Caravan of Death.” Shortly after the anti-communist coup on September 11th, 1973, Jara was arrested, tortured under interrogation and eventually got a bullet in the head. Afterwards, his body was thrown in the street of a shanty town in Santiago. Good riddance.

Why Removal? Despite being labeled a peaceful singer/song writer, Jara was a dedicated communist and antagonist to the traditional and conservative Chilean people. He considered himself essentially a man of the people and the bard to the Popular Unity Government under Salvador Allende – who planned on making Chile a Soviet satellite state, after he converted the country to a leftwing socialist nightmare (inflation was at 150% prior to the coup with plans for land redistribution and social justice reforms). Early in his recording career he showed a knack (don’t they all) for provoking normal and religious Chileans, releasing a traditional comic song called La beata that depicted a religious woman tempting a priest at confession. The song was rightfully banned on radio stations and removed from record shops. Prior to being physically removed by Pinochet’s men, it was well known that Jara had made visits to both Cuba and the Soviet Union (including a concert in Moscow) in the early 1960s and he had officially joined the Communist Party. In addition, there were rumors that Jara was involved in unsavory sexual activities (think pedophilia).

The Happening: On the morning of September 12th, Jara was taken as a prisoner by the military and interned in the Chile Stadium. His body was later discarded outside the stadium along with other subversives who had been killed by the Chilean Army. Prior to being shot in the head, Victor Jara had his hands broken – either as a punishment for playing his guitar or something more sinister.

4. The Power of Poetry vs. El Caudillo
http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2017/01/Miguel-Hern-ndez-removed.jpg
Miguel Hernández
- was an early 20th century Spanish poet and playwright associated with the Generation of '27 movement and the Generation of '36 movement. His fate was sealed as a member of the Communist Party of Spain since Hernández “fought” for the Spanish Republicans, the merciless bastards that wanted to destroy Catholic Spain during the Spanish Civil War. During the war he wrote poetry and propaganda. Fortunately, he was unsuccessful in escaping Spain after the Republicans finally surrendered (they hardly ever won a battle, unless it was murdering priests and nuns). After the war, he was arrested multiple times for his anti-fascist sympathies (think pinko commie signaling).

Why Removal? Eventually, Hernández joined the First Calvary Company of the Peasants' Battalion as a cultural-affairs officer, reading his propaganda poetry daily on the radio. He traveled extensively throughout the country, organizing communist cultural events and doing poetry readings for soldiers on the front lines. Like Jara, Hernández also traveled to the USSR, where he acted as a representative for the Spanish Republic (and likely got his marching orders from the Soviets). He also attended the II International Congress of Antifascist Writers which took place in Madrid and Valencia.

The Happening: After the Republicans and their communist allies were defeated, he was condemned to death in 1939 - he was described as, "an extremely dangerous and despicable element to all good Spaniards." The Nationalists gave him a pretty reasonable out - he was presented with an opportunity to renounce communism and apologize for betraying Spain. He refused, but his death sentence, however, was commuted to a prison term of 30 years, leading to incarceration in several prisons where he eventually croaked from tuberculosis in 1942.

3. "Muh Resistance"
http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2017/01/Jean-Moulin1---Removed.jpg
Jean Moulin
– the French Resistance, for the most part, was extremely overrated by both the Western Allies (the Soviets had a different sort of involvement) and Charles de Gaulle – de Gaulle probably deserves his own Alt-Right dressing down, the man was a disgrace to both the French military and the Pied-Noirs. Thanks to de Gaulle’s involvement, Jean Moulin was propped up and became the face of the Resistance and idolized after the war. He is remembered today as the main emblem of the Resistance, owing mainly to his role in unifying elements of the French Resistance (think communists, trade unionists and, finally, patriotic Frenchmen) and his highly publicized death at the hands of the “Butcher of Lyon” Klaus Barbie.

Why Removal? For starters, Moulin was no soldier during the Fall of France in 1940. He was a prefect (think government administer with broad powers). He was arrested shortly after the German invasion because he refused to admit that French Senegalese colonial troops had massacred French civilians. To be fair, there is much of the Second World War that could be described as “murky” at best, but the Senegalese (African units both from the French colonies in North Africa and also many from sub-Saharan Africa) were known after The Great War (think "The Black Shame") and after World War II (their mass rape of Italian women) for grotesque horrors committed on the civilian population. After the massacre, the German Wehrmacht had many of the Senegalese executed and requested that Moulin sign-off on the action to prevent them from being accused of “muh war crimes.” Moulin refused. He even refused after personnel from the German army personally walked him to the site of the massacre and showed him the bodies of civilian men, women and children who had been butchered, raped and mangled.

Now, most of the history of the Second World War is shrouded in propaganda and most everything the Germans claimed (with respect to conduct) has been described as “lies” by the press (especially today). In Moulin’s case, the Germans claimed that while he was imprisoned in a POW camp with those Senegalese troops (likely quartered with Moulin as payback for not acknowledging the massacre), Moulin developed “a taste for blacks.” Per the Germans, Moulin was a homosexual and during a lover’s quarrel with one of his African comrades, the dindu slit his throat with a piece of broken glass. Moulin claimed that he attempted suicide, but that doesn’t really stack up – considering that rumors about Moulin’s homosexuality still exist today and his close “friendship” with (((Max Jacob))) being a blatant red-flag – Jacob was a well-known communist and homosexual poet and painter. Immediately after the war, Moulin was painted as the epitome of the Frenchman womanizer, but in the Current Year™ - it’s pretty well known in France that he was a homosexual.

Moulin was eventually released from custody (because that’s what the evil Nazis did) and joined the French Resistance.

The Happening: In reality, Moulin’s involvement in the Resistance was exaggerated at best – and, he overshadows brave men who did fight and die in the Resistance. Like the others on our list, Moulin was clearly a communist infiltrator (and by some accounts utilized by the Soviets to get close to de Gaulle). Moulin had been described as a “fellow traveler” due to his friendship with open communists and he had supported the Republicans during the Spanish Civil War (a recurring theme). Moulin was eventually betrayed by a fellow member of the Resistance - some historians, including Klaus Barbie, blamed communist (((Raymond Aubrac))). Rumors on Moulin’s death, along with Barbie’s interrogation “tactics,” are so outrageous that they demand a certain level of skepticism – like skinning Moulin alive or using bestiality as a torture technique. For a man labeled the “Butcher of Lyon,” it’s somewhat suspect that he was (again) rumored to have been recruited by the West German government to eventually assist the CIA with tracking down Che Guevara.

2. An (((Uprising))) Crushed
http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2017/01/Rosa-Luxemberg-Removed.jpg
(((Rosa Luxemburg)))
- was a Marxist theorist, philosopher, economist, anti-war activist and revolutionary Jewish communist. A convenient piece of history that occurred in Germany after the First World War and is generally excluded in modern history books (at least in the US) – was that Germany was in the middle of a post-war revolution (called the November Revolution 1918 - 1919). The outcome being either the failed Weimer Republic or a Soviet Germany. The uprising was primarily a power struggle between the moderate Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) and the Communist Party of Germany, led by Karl Liebknecht and (((Rosa Luxemburg))), who had previously founded and led the revolutionary leftwing Spartacist League, along with (((Leo Jogiches))), (((Paul Levi))), Ernest Meyer, Franz Mehring and (((Clara Zetkin - honorary))).

Why Removal? The Spartacist Uprising (also known as the January Uprising) was a general strike, including armed battles in the streets, in Germany in January 1919. On Sunday, January 5th, thousands of armed communists gathered in the streets of Berlin. By the afternoon, Berlin’s train stations and the newspaper district were occupied by the communists. They also took over a police headquarters and demanded the overthrow of the German government – their vision – the destruction of an already weak and exhausted Germany and its transformation into a Bolshevik state (led by communist Jews).

The Happening: The German government eventually unleashed the Freikorps – a band of World War 1 veterans with a fondness for physically removing subversives and communists. In addition to crushing the January Uprising, they would also fight the communists in the Baltics and defeat the Bavarian Soviet Republic. It could be fair to call them one of the world’s first “death squads.” With respect to the militant Jewish uprising led by (((Luxemburg))) and her toady, Liebknecht – the men of the Freikorps quickly liberated the blocked streets and buildings and many of the insurgents were killed or surrendered. Unsurprisingly, (((Luxemburg))) and Liebknecht were found hiding in a Berlin apartment a few days later. They were arrested and handed over to the Freikorps unit - Garde-Kavallerie-Schützen-Division, led by Captain Waldemar Pabst. In the end, it probably didn’t matter how much the communists squirmed and tried to talk their way out of their fate – they were both shot in the head. Particularly fitting was (((Luxemburg’s))) demise, her body was unceremoniously dumped in the Landwehr Canal – it was discovered months later.

Her last known writing before she met the business end of a German 98 Mauser was “Order Prevails in Berlin.” It was written while she was hiding after the uprising was crushed. Here is the last line: ““Order prevails in Berlin!” You foolish lackeys! Your “order” is built on sand. Tomorrow the revolution will “rise up again, clashing its weapons,” and to your horror it will proclaim with trumpets blazing: I was, I am, I shall be!”

Sounds crazy. Sounds like she had it coming.

1. A First-Class Coincidence
http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2017/01/Ruth-First---removed.jpg
(((Ruth First)))
- was a South African anti-apartheid activist and commie scholar born in Johannesburg, South Africa. Her parents were Latvian Jews that immigrated to South Africa in 1906. Predictably, as soon as they arrived in their new home they began the process of destroying it – they became one of the founders of the Communist Party of South Africa. Eventually, (((First))) would become a communist as well, with her mission being the overthrow of the White minority government and securing the country’s utter devastation. Just another coincidence in history – Jews immigrating to a new county and then advocating for said country’s demise through either radical leftist agitation or racial disunity (or both). She would later encourage mining strikes and communist subversion and found herself banned and exiled from the country. She was also married to another prominent anti-apartheid activist, proud communist and politician – (((Yossel Mashel Slovo))) – changed his name to “Joe” for easier infiltration (also a Jewish immigrant from the Baltics).

Why Removal? Do we still need to ask at this point? In March 1960, thousands of South African dindus essentially tried to destroy a police station in Sharpeville, South African. The White police officers, using Sten sub-machine guns and bolt-action rifles, along with armored personnel carriers, were eventually able to quell the crowd through deadly force. Today – the incident is called the Sharpeville Massacre. In South Africa the “official” story is that a peaceful and vibrant crowd of oppressed South Africans were brutally attacked by the evil and racist police state. In reality, less than 200 White police officer were being swarmed by 20,000 rioting blacks hurling stones at them – everyone in the Current Year™ knows the real score. It was fight or be torn limb from limb.

Anyway, (((First))) and her anti-White husband (((Slovo))) were doing what all Jews do – instigating and riling up the dindus against the White government (the government and people that created civilization in Africa). She and her husband had been the vanguard of anti-White rioting during the 1950s. (((Slovo))) had actually joined a communist and explicitly anti-White militia (designed off the Red Army). In addition, scores of White South African police officer had been assassinated, killed in raids or assaulted during the Jewish-led “soft” uprising during the 1950s.

By 1960 (and after the Sharpeville riot), her time in South African came to end. Back when governments actually cared for their people, the South African government came to the wise decision that this Jewish subversive needed to be exiled and removed from the country.

The Happening: Not content to live her life peacefully abroad, (((First))) moved to London and became involved in the British anti-apartheid movement. She would later move back to Africa (Mozambique) and continue advocating for the destruction of Whites in South Africa. Cue a man called Craig Williamson – quoted as once saying, “I respect a person who's willing to die for his country, but I admire a person who is prepared to kill for his country." Williamson, exposed as spy (and all-around “special operator”) in 1980, is accused of physically removing (((First))) in 1982. Evidently, she received explosive first-class prank mail – which ended her anti-White and communist campaigning.

[Each entry is accompagned with a photography of the subject on which is overwritten "Physically Removed"]

Eugene McCarthy #crackpot macroevolution.net

Stabilization Theory

An alternative theory of evolution

The main claims of stabilization theory, which distinguish it from neo-Darwinian theory, can be summarized as follows:

1. The typical form treated as a species comes into being via certain well-known, well-documented genetic processes ("stabilization processes") that produce new stable forms in an extremely rapid manner;
2. These processes produce new forms that are, for genetic reasons, inherently stable from the time of their inception right up to the time of their extinction. A corollary of this claim is the theory's assertion that any given type of organism produced by such a process has a negligible tendency to change over time in response to environmental constraints.

These primary tenets of stabilization theory can be contrasted with the following salient claims of neo-Darwinian theory:

1. The typical new form treated as a distinct species comes into being gradually through the accumulation of certain characteristic traits within an evolving population over time;
2. The accumulation and spread of these traits is due to environmental influences favoring the survival and reproduction of individuals having such traits (natural selection).

Only a few words of difference, but the implications are huge. Consider how extensively Darwinian theory has influenced not only biology, but also society at large and you will see that the stakes here are incredibly high — what if the axioms of Darwin's theory actually are erroneous? — and subsequent discussion will provide excellent reasons for believing they actually are — Then the theory itself is wrong and the entire Weltanschauung based upon it is mistaken. For example, under stabilization theory we select and shape our environment. The neo-Darwinian outlook, of course, is just the opposite: Under that view, the environment selects and shapes us.

As we shall see, the relative merits of these two hypotheses can in fact be evaluated by considering which of the two is more consistent with available data. But first, let's look at some examples of stabilization processes.

Submitter’s note: I’ll just summarise the rest.


The Theory
1. Evolutionary change is sudden, not gradual (Saltationism)
2. Speciation generally occurs as a result of hybridisation between species that may not be closely related. Humans, for instance, are chimpanzee-pig hybrids and platypi are mammal-bird hybrids.
3. Convergent evolution is a fallacy born from the assumption of traditional taxonomy and Darwinian evolution, they are actually the result of hybridisation

The Evidence
1. Birth defects that vaguely resemble another type of animals, e.g. syrenomelia and Harlequin ichtyosis support human-fish hybridisation.
2. Similarities actually due to convergent evolution.
3. He has a doctorate in genetics and researches hybridisation. Unless you are a geneticist and hybridisation expert as well, you are not qualified to criticise his theory. Even if you’re a biologist specialised in another relevant field.

Pinochos #fundie christianpost.com

[Regarding Hallmark's decision to sell greeting cards for same-sex weddings/commitments]

"Well, here's another well-known business that's gone the way of the dogs. Yep! Satan is alive and well . . . going about devouring whom he pleases. Shame on you Hallmark!"

Apefricoon Devil #racist #wingnut #dunning-kruger chimpmania.com

Nigger pavement apes' shitty dark bodies are no more due to any "adaptations to solar heat" than their monstrous nostrils or coarse velcro "hair" are. Carleton Coon was just an ignorant Darwinist fool who, like all 20th-century Darwinian fools, believed humans and niggers are both apes and are "descended from common ancestors". (Hence the Darwinist libtards constant, deliberate, and degrading use of the exceedingly misleading words "white" and "black" to describe mankind and niggerkind respectively)

[…]

The tawny Hottentots live side by side with sable Kaffirs in Africa. The ancient "Indians" of California, in the latitude of 42 degrees, were as "blagg" as the niggers of Guinea. And in Africa, the darkest niggers are 12 or 15 degree north latitude; while they become less dark the nearer they approach the equator. Dark eskimos live in the exact same latitude as the fair humans of Highland Scotland, yet they don't have similar fair complexions. Gorillas and orangutan apes who live in rainforests of Africa and Asia, away from the "intense" solar heat", have similar shitty dark bodies as the full-blooded groids of sub-saharan Africa. Here in Australia, far away from the equator, the so-called "aboriginal" niggers have the same distinctive shitty dark bodies of the niggers of Africa. As you can see, Darwinian hypothesis of "natural adaptation" is nothing but a demoralising delusion wherewith libtards try to degrade mankind to social "equality" with disgusting Apefricoon beasts.

(PS. it's a well-known scientific fact that black objects absorb the most heat. And this is why you hear scientists telling elderly and young children not to wear dark clothes during scorching summer days)

Answers Magazine #fundie answersingenesis.org

(This gem of Funditude comes to us from the "good" people who brought us the "Creation Museum" in KY, this is their July-September issue)

MONSTER RECORD

A partial fossil of what is presumed to be the largest known marine reptile has been found on a Norwegian island in the Arctic. Dubbed "the Monster," it appears to have been 50 feet long, larger than any other known pliosaur, including the well-known kronosaurs.
One expert suggested that The Monster would be able to "pick up a small car in its jaws and bite it in half."
Creationists suggest that biblical references to "sea monsters" such as Leviathan, could have been pliosaurs or plesiosaurs. Other old accounts of sea monsters, found across the globe, could be evidence that monsterous sea reptiles did not die out millions of years before humans appeared but were observed by people in relatively recent times.

Unregistered #racist niggermania.net

Niggers are simple minded creatures and need constant stimulation and excitement so they're constantly creating new niggerbabble to ook and eek at each other. Additionally, it makes them feel special and "smart" when other races can't understand what they're ooking about. So, that's another reason for the niggerbabble constantly changing- as soon as humans get wise to what they mean, they can't stand it and have to change the "code."

This point was driven home to me in a way when I overheard a nigger who was in the military talking to a group of other niggers about how he'd gone on leave back to the USA and had come back to Japan- he was all upset and said, "Dayum! I couldn't unnerstan' anything da brothers back in da world wuz sayin'." And he'd only been gone from the USA for TWO YEARS!

They quickly agreed that they needed to learn all the latest niggerbabble to be "connected." Otherwise, when they met their homies who'd just arrived off da boat so to speak, they wouldn't be able to "communicate." Even so, I don't know what they were so concerned about- it's not like their nigger card would get revoked- they'd always be niggers.

Nephre #conspiracy cracked.com

[5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think]

What a disingenuous manner of presenting sound science. You begin with 911 and birth certificate topics asserting that each is "debunked" when this is untrue. Careful examination of the birth certificate shown to the public showed kerning - a capability that was _impossible_ at the time of the future President's birth. This is not supposition, this is pure fact - pure data - undeniable and solid evidence of tampering and falsification of the record for the public. To an idiot, this fact is irrelevant. One's politics or beliefs have _nothing_ to do with this fact, and the fact is now irrefutable do to the wide distribution of the falsified document. So _you_, using your own twisted logic, present these examples (neither of which has been debunked) as evidence of the unscientific reasoning of people? Interesting. It is precisely the "genetic flaw" - a well-known flaw of logic known to real scientists as opposed to inept pop-art writers LOL.

[After people ignore his drivel]

Not surprised, apparently Cracked, lacking in any real integrity or commitment to publishing truthfully, already took down my critique of this article - namely that it is a lie. One needs only read the first references to 911 and the birth certificate topics, neither of which has ever been debunked. As I mentioned in the previous comment, the birth certificate shown to the public had kerning - a capability that was impossible at the time of the future president's birth. This showed clearly that the document that was shown to us was fake. This is not a matter that is subject to one's politics or beliefs - a simple fact - the very substance of science itself - data, fact. Thus, the examples used in this article represent a terrible effort to deceive (or complete scientific incompetence). Please see the examples provided below in the list of logical fallacies, which identify this article as belonging to the Strawman fallacy.

NotQuiteChadLite #sexist incels.co

Eating pussy is for betas. In fact I remember seeing many Craigslist posts of desperate betas offering "pussy eating service" it's literally just another form of alpha fux beta bux. Chad doesn't eat pussy, she sucks his dick and creampies it.

Bethany Blankley #fundie charismanews.com

By destroying the institution of marriage, the "gay rights" LBGQTI movement made possible the extension of similar "legal rights" for other "lifestyle choices," including zoophilia, consanguinamorous relationships, necrophilia, pedophilia, polygamy, and every other "fluid" sexual preference or identification—including sologamy and trans-polyamorous relationships.

Efforts to normalize sex with animals as an accepted lifestyle choice resulted in one documentary winning an award this year that idolizes a sexual relationship between a man and his bottlenose dolphin lover.

The 40-year movement to legalize sexual interaction with children is working. People are publicly advocating without shame: "I'm a pedophile, but not a monster;" and, "pedophilia is natural and normal for males."

Now, incest activists in the consanguinamorous community argue it's their turn to have their sexual preference and lifestyle choice validated socially and legally.

Because of a case in New Mexico that's making national headlines, incest activists argue exactly what homosexuals argued to normalize incest.

"I was born this way."

"I can't choose who I love."

"I have a right to be happy just like everyone else."

"We aren't hurting anyone."

"Who is the government to legislate love?"

Incest activists maintain that all sexual preferences and acts should be legal if they are consensual and don't harm anyone. More importantly, the government should not be legislating love.

Christina Shy, an incest activist who runs an advocacy and support website for consanguinamorous people, and is in a relationship with her half-brother, argues that incest "needs to be brought to the attention of everybody in the country and people need to start thinking differently. It was the same with gay people just a few years ago and now they can get married they are accepted. Well why not consanguinamorous people like us? We are all adults. We are not pedophiles, there's no domestic issue. We are in love, we want to be together, but we are related. That shouldn't be a deciding factor."

She's right—if sex is consensual among adults in the privacy of their own home—how is it wrong or even illegal?

How is consensual sex between two adult men different than consensual sex between adult brothers and sisters or adult mothers and sons? If two adult men can legally marry each other, why can't consensual adult incestuous couples?

Why should one consensual relationship be denied and another legal?

Incestuous adults aren't coercing anyone. They are knowingly making choices about their own bodies, so why does anyone have a problem with it? It's really none of anyone else's business.

If transgender people in America, who represent less than half of one percent of the population, can have the government dictate bathroom policies for non-transgender people in public schools and stores, why won't the government legalize consanguinamorous relationships?

Homosexuals, who represent less than 3 percent of the population in America, can legally marry and adopt children, why can't incestuous, polygamists, pedophiles and zoophiles?

If morality and laws are determined by personal preferences (that are fluid and always changing) to justify societal norms, why is a different standard being used to legislate incest, necrophilia or pedophilia than that of same-sex relationships?

Incestuous relationships are mutually consensual, therefore they should be legal. (The same reasoning can be applied to murder. Surely, if two people agree to murder someone, in fact a group of people consent to murder another group of people, their consent justifies their action, which should therefore legalize murder.)

The same goes for polygamy. And necrophilia.

Why is having sex with dead people wrong? The corpse doesn't care. It's dead. It doesn't hurt the corpse; it doesn't even know what's happening. Granted, it can't consent to the sexual act, but that doesn't matter because there are enough necrophiliacs to argue that their sexual preference is normal.

When it comes to not hurting anyone, incest activists argue that abortion is legal, so again, what standard is being used to legislate harm to another person?

They are right. If a baby has no constitutional rights, and adults do, why can't the adults, who aren't harming anyone else, be together?

Practicing homosexuality used to be illegal. Now gays can marry. Times have changed, so who has the audacity to suggest that incest is not the new normal of the 21st century family? Or bestiality?

"Non-human animals have incestuous relationships and multiple partners," some activists argue. Likewise, it's well-known that kings and queens had incestuous relationships for centuries to 'keep their bloodline pure.'

So, who is the government to legislate love? Everyone has the right to love whomever they choose. All love is equal. How is heterosexual love better than incestuous love or being in love with multiple partners?

As the defendant in the New Mexico case argues, as to why he should be allowed to love, have sex with and even marry his mother, he says: "This is about whether I have the right to love someone. And I sure (expletive) have the right to love Monica. You can't tell people who to love or who not to love."

His mother's name, Monica, could easily be "Matthew," the name of a brother, father, uncle or homosexual boyfriend.

No love is wrong.

Gay rights activists and corrupt politicians who chose to legalize same-sex marriage and transgender bathroom policies, have no justification to prevent the legalization other sexual behavior.

IHateeWomen #sexist #psycho #wingnut incels.co

[Discussion] Hypothetical Scenario: You become the ruler of a country, what do you change?

In this hypothetical scenario you have suddenly become the supreme ruler of your own country, you have absolute power and can enact laws to help mold society into your perfect image. My main goal would be to end gynocentrism and female hypergamy as quickly as possible and keep that system in place permanently. First off I will deploy soldiers within the country in anticipation of riots or civil unrest and then make a televised address to the entire country. In this address I will explain the black pill, how gynocentrism is leading to the decay of our society and then announce the new laws.

Law 1 - All feminism and ideologies related to gynocentrism will be completely outlawed.

Before this law is enacted, all well known promoters of feminism either online or in scholarly settings such as universities will be quickly executed. This is very important because it will allow the people in the country to become blackpilled quicker as well as prevent future feminist insurrections. After this law is passed, anyone found to have broken it will be executed because gynocentrism will not be allowed to seep back into society. I have identified two possible issues with this law which would be false accusations done against innocent people in an attempt to get them executed and the possibility of some military members having any relation to the popular feminists that are to be executed. In order to combat these issues, a special task force or department must be created in order to investigate these claims of feminism seriously and no execution will occur if they do not find sufficient evidence. It will be difficult for this task force to not find someone who's a secret feminist because they will search your home from top to bottom if accused, they will treat it as terrorism and have extensive resources.
For the military, background checks will be done on every single popular or scholarly feminist and any family members found to be in the military will be executed along with them. This must be done in order to maintain an army that will follow my orders and plan for society.

Law 2 - Government assigned partners

Every single man in this country will be assigned a woman to marry at the age of 18 but he has two options. He can marry a woman in his own race that will at least be 2+ his looksmatch while if he wants to to marry a woman outside his race, then that woman will be his looksmatch. This will be done in order to discourage racemixing, the law on a whole completely solves inceldom and leads to the betterment of society. There shouldn't be any issues with this law because they will be solved with the one below.

Law 3- Adultery is outlawed

No person will have any sexual relations of any kind outside of their government issued spouse and breaking this law will be punishable by death. This will help prevent Chad from fucking every hole he sees and also prevent your wife from cheating on you or abandoning you. These executions must be publicly televised to set an example, the adulterer will be brought out onto the stage and then beaten to death by her/his family members(preferably using instruments such as baseball bats or brass knuckles). If any of of the adulterer's family refuse to participate then they will be executed as well by the same method.

Law 4- Abortions will be outlawed

Done in order to support Law 3, any child born will automatically be tested to make sure that the father is the government issued husband, if not then Law 3 is broken and that means she will be beaten to death by her family as per execution. A concern will be illegal abortion clinics being set up, this will also be something handled by the task force and if one is found then everyone working at the abortion clinic will be executed. The task force will routinely monitor gynaecologists and obstetricians to make sure they do not secretly carry out these abortions as well since they are the group most likely to be involved in the formation of an illegal clinic and even retired ones will be monitored. The execution method for abortion related crimes will be beheading.

Law 5- Makeup is banned

Women will no longer be able to raise their SMV by artificial means, being caught using makeup or in possession will carry a prison sentence of 5-10 years with possibility of parole after the 5. Conjugal visits will be generously allowed for the husband so he doesn't get lonely and also anyone caught manufacturing makeup products will be executed.

Law 6 - Elliot Rodger Day

Two national holidays will be created in memory of our dear departed Elliot Rodger, one on the 23rd of May and another on the 24th of July, Elliot will be recognized as a national hero and statues of him will be made across the country. Any negative remarks about Elliot Rodger or his two national holidays will be punishable by death.

Law 7 - Social Media and Internet Act

Online dating is no longer necessary therefore they will all be banned, also all gyrocentric social media like facebook, snapchat, reddit, instagram, etc. (basically all social media) will be fucking banned as well. I imagine that people will be able to still use these social media via a vpn but they will be investigated and their punishment will depend on what they posted on that account. Also obviously anyone stupid enough to be caught using a dating app will be executed since that breaks Law 3.

Law 8- The blackpill will be taught in schools at all levels of education in a mandatory class, it will be done in order to warn future members of society about what will happen to society if we let female hypergamy and gynocentrism run rampant again. These classes will all be attended by a task force agent so that if a child expresses gynocentric or feminist views, their household and parents will subsequently be investigated.

Law 9 - Not necessarily a law but more so a policy change, I would make sure that the medical sector directs more funds towards research related to male pattern hair loss in order to eliminate the Norwood Reaper once and for all.

I might have forgotten other stuff that I wanted to change but these are the main laws I wanted to enact.

Anonymous #sexist desuarchive.org

Lesbian porn is a sign of a beta-male

While watching any kind of porn is already pretty pathetic there is nothing worse than a straight guy watching lesbian porn.When a person is young and watches lesbian porn they do so because they are too unfamiliar with the concept of sex to imagine themselves doing it.However if a grown man watches lesbian porn it indicates that
1:He's so insecure that he can't even imagine himself partaking in physical contact with a female.
2:Hes fine with allowing his mate have sex with another potential mate pointing to a cuckold fetish
So if you watch lesbian porn you need to either change your ways or accept yourself as a beta.

Inceljoe #sexist incels.co

Holy shit, the chad fucks/beta bux story IN REAL LIFE

Im not quite sure if my contacts with different Chad-guys is a curse or a blessing. I mean, on one hand, it makes me fucking miserable, but in another way, in just confirms all the theories we (and evolutionary psychologists) have.

This guy is an online-friend I used to play computer games with a couple years back. He is a very good looking dude, he still plays computer games, he competes in "counter strike" and is pretty good at it.

Anyway, we bullshitted in our group on facebook and he told us something he recently experienced, it went like this:


He starts talking to a girl online, pretty good looking but nothing astonishing, anyway, they hit it off and everything feels good, so they decide to meet up.

When he arrives at her place, she gives him a shot and a beer immidately, she is also drinking and seems to wanna get drunk pretty quickly.

In about 30 minutes, they are making out hardcore on the sofa, and he is sucking on her tittie. They had called a taxi, cause they were heading out to the club together, so they discontunue the making out and go with the taxi to the club. Being there, they dance and all that shit, then after like 1-2 hours she wanna go home to her place again, said and done.

They get there, she rips his clothes off in the hallway and starts blowing him, then he fucks her over the kitchen table and in her bed.
Next morning, they fuck again and again. Then he goes home.

A week or two goes by, then they talk some more and she asks if he wanna come over again. Said and done.

During all this time, he thinks she is single and is looking for a boyfriend, so despite her not being super hot, he is quite into it as he likes to spend time with her. He comes over, they fuck all weekend.

Then he starts noticing weird stuff, like her phone constantly getting notifications and its a guy writing to her which she quickly remove from the screen. At first, he says nothing about it, but eventually he brings it up and she gives some bullshit answer, she can sense he know she is lying, so eventually she speaks the truth:

The guy who writes to her so much, is her actual boyfriend. So he asks her, "why the fuck do u bring me over then if u have a boyfriend?" in which she replies: "but he is not a guy i can think myself .. long term with, i dont wanna reproduce with that guy", SHE DONT WANNA REPRODUCE WITH THAT GUY.

He looks him up, the boyfriend that is, and the boyfriend is several points below him in looks.

He said to us, that this girl was super sweet and all, her personality, he would never have guessed she is a fucking whore.

My friend gets kinda hurt and tells her he was hoping she was looking for a boyfriend and her intentions was to make him a boyfriend. After that, he goes home and SHE NEVER WRITES TO HIM AGAIN.

You hear that?

This is fucking spermwars book in action.

She HAD her provider, who gave emotional support, and on the side, she searched for "alpha/lover seed". Not only that, but when the "lover" told her that HE wanna fill the boyfriend cup and "be hers", she cut the contact with him.

Her plans was actually to keep her beta-ugly-boyfriend, and at the same time keep fucking my friend for his looks, telling nobody of the guys of what was actually going on.


Im so fucking disgusted by females, I hear shit like this every day now, FEMALES HAVE NO HEART AT ALL AND NO SOUL

Women will ALWAYS fuck a chad behind your back even if you manage to get a girlfriend.

This is so fucking disgusting, i hate this world.

I mean, its one thing to read about it, in theory, like reading the shit those evo psych nerds conclude. But when you actually hear about that shit happening in real life, not only once or twice, but all the fucking time .. Then it really hits you how disgusting and disloyal these women are.

HOW CAN YOU have a "partner", and then continously cheat on him and lie every day to him? I would never ever be able to do that, to TRICK my girlfriend Im on live with her, then fucking tons of other girls any time she went away.

Thats just disgusting and horrible behaviour.

But females seem to have no problem with it, its like they cannot even see their fucked up way of behaving.

This is what confuses me.

When he declared to her that HE was looking for a relationship, IE to "fill the boyfriend role", she did never talk to him again.

So its not like she wanted to replace her cuck-boyfriend, she wanted to still be with him, but to FUCK Chad behind his back.

I dont get that. Why dont she wanna REPLACE the boyfriend with the Chad? Is it cause she is already so emotionally invested in her beta bux?

They want the best of both worlds, different men filling different needs all at the same time. The ultimate narcissists.

It seems like when my friend the "alpha" or "chad", tried to replace the boyfriend-role, she didnt want nothing to do with it, cause that "role" was always filled by her boyfriend. She wanted 2 different men for 2 different purposes, and when the Chad, whos purpose was to FUCK and nothing else, tried to get into the other role, which was already occupied, she lost the interest.

That is very interesting.

Seems to be the case. She’s probably afraid of the repercussions if she just outright abandons him for chad.

I wonder if they instinctively know that Chad is a high-risk to enter a LTR/cuck relationship with? Cause they know Chad has zillions of women who want him, so he is not a safe card for emotional support.

So for boyfriend ,they take some dude who they know dont have so many options and who is not a high T speciemen, cause he is "safe", so they emotionally invest in him, and let him be there for their emotional bullshit, but they still CRAVE the Chad cock, so they cheat with Chad when they want sex.

The moment he signalled that he values her more than she valued him, the attraction dropped off. They want the unobtainable, not the defeated.

Hold on, could you talk a little more about this? you might be right on the money here

Btw, aren't you the guy with Chad landlord? Must be hell for you jfl

yes I am. Im getting more and more used to it, cause i get to hear about black pill things i never would if i wasnt. It kinda sucks some times, but i know i never gonna slay anyway so wahtever

It is the dual mating strategy, beta fulfils her emotional and monetary/resource needs, while chad fulfils her primal and genetic needs for a high tier male, had the chad continued to meet with her she most likely would have let him get her pregnant (Claiming she is on the pill when she is not or something similar) and duped the beta into thinking the child was his.

This is just brutal, THESE WHORES ARE SO FUCKING BRUTAL, CHAIN THEM


Imagine getting a son, and then after 15 years or so, you get informed he is NOT your son, he is the son of some fucking giga-Chad she cheated with LOL

jesus fucking christ, this is why you dont talk to females at all , all of them whores.

disgusting

Yes. I mean, Its not just a "coincidence", it happends all the fucking time now, ALL THE TIME. I hear about this shit all the time, every other day for fuck sake. Partly from my Chad landlord, but also his chad-friends, and also this online friend of mine.

All the time, females are cucking their BFs.

And think about every case around the western world that never come to the surface, cause most males are blue pilled idiots and trust their women? My god.

Bert Thompson #fundie discoverymagazine.com

Sometimes you will hear scientists speak of a hypothesis (high-POTH-eh-sis). This means that they have an idea (a "guess") about something, but do not yet have any facts to tell them if their idea is true or false. Sometimes scientists talk about a theory. If something is a theory, that means there are facts which show it might be true. Further testing will settle the matter.

However, if scientists speak of a law in science, they are talking about something which has been shown to be true all the time. In science, a law means there are no exceptions to the rule. The Law of Gravity is one example of this. Everyone knows that gravity holds things down—no exceptions. Gravity is not just a theory, it's a law.

There is another well-known law in science. It is known as the Law of Biogenesis (bye-oh-GEN-uh-sis). This law says two things: (1) living things always come from living things; and (2) living things produce only more living things like themselves.

For example, to get a cow, you must first have a living thing. But, that living thing cannot be a horse, or a donkey, or a whale. It must be a cow. To get a rose, you must have a living rose. To get a dog, you must have a living dog. That is what the Law of Biogenesis says. And remember—there are no exceptions to this scientific law.

Evolution is against the Law of Biogenesis! Evolutionists tell us that living things came from nonliving matter. They also tell us that one kind of animal gave rise to a different kind of animal. Further, evolutionists tell us that this happened over and over again to produce all the millions of animals which have ever existed. But that would break the law!

The Law of Biogenesis is real, and accepted as true by all scientists. Evolution cannot be true, because it is against this law. To have a law there must be a law-giver. Who gave us the Law of Biogenesis? That Law-Giver could only be God.

Laelaps_dracos #conspiracy reddit.com

What if I told you that all the power the PC seem to have is nothing more than a superficial construct? They would have you believe that they are in control of the social media and everyone is on their side.

But that’s not true. Political Correctness is its own biggest lie. They make you think they can: destroy your reputation if you say the wrong thing, rewrite history, adjust our youth’s minds in an effort to support their agenda and you should conform because no matter what you say they are the ones in 90% of the schools and they determine the mindset of the next generation of voters.

Well here is a newsflash: that isn’t true anymore. Last year a secret revolution occurred that allowed republicans to win the midterms; and it’s the same reason why Donald Trump has retained so much support. Last year when sales of Grand Theft Auto V (the latest addition to the most Politically Incorrect video-game series of all time, Grand Theft Auto) reached nearly a billion dollars in on its first week on the shelves; the highest elites among the Politically fled from their thrones of influence.

Since then the PC have lost all influence on social websites such as YAHOO! No longer may user accounts be suspended for homophobic, sexist, or even racist comments. From this point the majority of the PC have devoted their time to social media trolling. But now the threat of the rise of the PC over the Video-game Industry, which will lead to the boycott and eventual banishment of the Politically Incorrect chauvinistic, sexist, racist, video-game series known as Grand Theft Auto, and a totalitarian conquering of this nation, must be countered with a new national conversation (White people are the real victims of slavery, Imperialism, racism).

From past observations of the PC Administrations of influential Campuses, they have been planning to destroy the video-game series known as GTA for a long time. One school principal threatened to call the police on parents that let their kids play Grand Theft Auto. And know the final piece in the prophecy has arrived. On November 10, 2015 the video-game known as Fallout 4 will be released.

These video-games may become a symbol for the left. They have already become a tool for spreading liberalism into the minds of our youth. Fallout was once the Post-Apocalyptic Pulp Fiction of video-games, but now it has become no more than a message for liberalism in general after the PC Bethesda Game Studios stole the copyrights to the Fallout series from its original developers Black Isles.

In Past years BGS has injected messages into its videogames: Green Peace/Animal welfare, Feminism, gay rights, racial equality, income equality, anti-war, anti-military, and more recently Marxism.

Here are the Leftist messages in the FO games:

The Evidence:

Green Peace is about the world is coming to an end because of humanity and they put it right inside of a videogame that takes place after a nuclear war.

The very theme song of FO3 is a testament to the left- “I don’t want to set the world on fire”. This very song utters the doom and gloom over global warming and urbanization.

FO3 there is a NPC known as Harold who appeared in previous FO games. But when Harold appeared in BGS’s Capital Wasteland they just had to add a PC swing to him. In FO3 the character Harold (already exposed to Forced Evolutionary Virus and having a tree named Bob growing out of him) has become fused with tree growing out of him, his legs become roots. . He was discovered by several people who began to worship him as a god, and a small and exclusive cult known as the Treeminders began to form in secrecy. Bob began to blossom and many plants grew in this area, which became green with life, a stark contrast to the outer wasteland. Tree minders is just another term for Tree huggers, which is exactly what the new game designers from BGS are.

FO3 also uses fear tactics to promote alternative energy. FO3 scares gamers into becoming advocates of energy efficiency. After playing, gamers are likely to think that if we don’t move towards alternate sources of energy we’ll run out of oil and gas and our world leaders will nukes us over the last remaining natural resources.

FO3 storyline pertains to the fight for clean water, and echoes the fear expressed by those in California. The truth is that the agriculture industry uses over 80% of the water in California. Most of the water in California is being used to clean almonds. So any attempts to cut down on the amount of water used by residents will never solve the issue.

In FNV there is an area known as Hidden valley bunker, on the outside of the bunkers are peace symbols and messages that display the anti-nuclear war mentality of the 1960’s through 1990’s (Before it became about anti-toxic waste, save the whales, and human beings are the scourge to nature, and where all going to die because of manmade Global warming).

There are messages about income inequality that appear in both FO3 and FNV. Outside of Fallout shelters lay signs once carried by the now dead protesters who thought screw the wealthy 1% because they can afford to enter the bunkers.

Animal Welfare has appeared in the FO games since the beginning. Animal Welfare groups believe that animals should be protected. While the radicals, Animal Rights activist believe that animals should have the same rights as people.

The intelligent deathclaws in FO2 bring about the issue of Animal Welfare. Products of the Enclave’s experiments these deathclaws had the ability to talk and fight closely alongside humans. These creatures cause the player to feel sympathy, for at one point in time the player must destroy the base containing most of the intelligent deathclaws, and later an NPC ( non-playable-character) bombs the shelter made for the last remaining surviving intelligent deathclaws.

The Enclave also becomes a target for doing unethical experiments on animals in FO2 (An Enclave scientist works in a sound proof room because of the unsettling screams of his test subjects. The player in disguise of an Enclave Soldier, has the option to kill the scientist in complete secrecy because the room is sound proof)

The Animal Friend perk in multiple FO games is clear evidence of Animal Welfare. With this perk certain creatures never become hostile towards the player, who may not want to fight them in the first place. With the second perk, animals will come to your aid against non-animal enemies.

FO3 - there is a NPC known as Moria Brown, who is based off a real life Marine Biologist of the same name. The real Moria Brown is a hero of animal huggers, who watch shows like whale wars and channels like Animal Planet. The in-game Moria Brown is openly opposed to violence against the creatures of the waste.

Anti-Animal Welfare/Rights: To appear as a neutral game FNV has the thorn. In the thorn the user can wager money on creature fights, compete against creatures for money, and set up custom fights. The user can also embark on a series of quest focused on fetching eggs for the thorn. With each quest the type of creatures the player most take eggs from becomes deadlier.

FO3 Galaxy News radio is a propaganda machine that encourages players to fight the good fight and bring down the U.S paramilitary industrial complex (known as the Enclave).

FO3 quest Tenpenny Tower is an obvious reference to the civil rights movement. The ghouls represent important black figures throughout history. Hence one ghouls has the name Bessie, the same name as a well-known African American singer of the period of time in which people started to think about the social injustices.

FO3 - Civil War in the Brotherhood of Steel because the BOS wanted to help the people of the Capital Wasteland (unlike the Enclave, which is the true U.S Government as depicted in these games)

That one song that appear in FO3 Galaxy News radio loop that goes something like bongo bongo bongo I don’t want to leave the Congo oh no no no no no! fenko finko funko I don’t want to leave the jungle I refuse to go!... That song obviously represents the anti-urbanization ideology of the far-left green movement; If you listen closely to that song you’ll hear them singing about how they don’t like the bright lights of the flashy cities and the noise of cars in their ears ; and no matter what you say I’ll stay right here! Dun dah duda duda dah duhda! Deeeh!!!

FNV: The communist NCR faction in FNV was once a constitutional republic; until Bethesda made it into a totalitarian communist faction that seizes private property for annex and makes farmers work in communes.

FNV: Caesar’s Legion is just a subliminal message meant to turn male and female gamers into feminist by using women as slaves. Caesar’s Legion also represents the feminist view of Las Vegas as a disgusting town of ill repute where women are forced to use their bodies to please men. They could not have made it more evident.

Most of that is in the last 2 FOs alone. The Enclave in the FOs smears the line between the U.S and the Nazis.

The Greatest evidence that FALLOUTGATE is not a conspiracy:

Black Isles studios (the original Fallout developers) refused to completely conform to their PC PR team, for example the original and present day logo of FO is a white guy with blonde hair known as the vault boy that actually represents president John F Kennedy; who is popular among the populace as he is thought to have prevented the first Nuclear War during the Cuban missiles crisis; and the Brotherhood of Steel a paramilitary organization that appears throughout all of the Fallout games with the goals of protecting humanity from advanced technologies by hoarding them all to themselves represents Kennedys deep-seated interest in advanced technologies before his death .

But then they included a vault girl (for obvious reasons), and the one time the game designers from Black Isles try to include a logo that would appear in the karma status for evil players that killed children, It was omitted from the original game cause it was a sketch of the vault boy kicking a pregnant vault girl in the belly.

This situation caused a firestorm among their PC PR managers, and the designers ultimately omitted it from the game before its release. Not only was this sketch offensive to women because it demonized them for having abortions, the PC claim that black isles studios shouldn't have given players the power to kill children in the first place. In the 1990’s games like FO2 were more realistic, which made them feel more unethical, but they included ethical storylines in which the players fought against Nazi like enemies in the name of peace, liberty, and freedom.

BGS never allowed children characters to be killed in any of its games during the time of Black Isles. And sense then BGS (for its PC desire that video-games become something more than just mindless violence of uncensored proportions) has gained the copyrights to the FO games.

Since then all child characters in Bethesda games have become invincible (accept in the case of ‘two’ carefully scripted ‘situations’ in Fallout 3 involving an Undetonated nuke destroying an entire town (which can be prevented by the player who will becomes immediately idolized by locals afterwards) and a low orbit ballistic mini nuke strike capable of targeting only one of several optional locations based on the characters choice( one of which was an enemy air force base that was the intended target for that quest and the others being pedestrian zones and the final choice being the headquarters of the protagonist party of the game. But you never get to watch a child character die in real time. They don’t show it.

In FNV there is a character known as Mr. House that reforms squabbling tribes into civilized societies after a nuclear war. What Mr. House actually represents is how the PC transformed a collection of uncensored videogames and their companies into meaningful experiences for those people that would arrive from the American cultural wars prior to 9/11. If you really go through the game and look at what Mr. House really is in his true form, you will see an old grotesque being clinging on to life with the power technology, popularity, and his final ledger states that he just wanted to improve humanity. But just like Mr. House PC hides you from the truth to protect you and make you see the best of things, and when you finally see the true nature of reality and how it all works it is hideous. In a way Mr. House is a perfect representation of PC.

In a way FNV may have just been an entire game structured off of PC. From the Republic of Dave and Dukov’s place in FO3 (Which I’m pretty sure by all observations that Dukov was a representation of either older FOs or GTA hidden inside FO3 and Cherry is a representation of FO3 itself. Dave from the Republic of Dave mocks GTA, which does hog all the attention but still GTA deserves all of its popularity by its own accord) to Rose of Sharon Cassidy and the xenophobic artillery hogging, ammo hoarding, grenade lobbing, explosive loving group known as the boomers in FNV (which represents what the PC imagines when they think of republicans).

In FNV it all makes sense once you look hard enough. If you still don't believe me look at what Bethesda Games was prior to 9/11 (see Elder Scrolls 2 Daggerfall for more info).

The video game cultural objectified women up until that point but then they realized that this wouldn't work out well in a new and reformed world with empowered females that would for the first time start to become curious about video games.

You see the computer games of the 1990's were never meant to be played by girls or women because just like Las Vegas and Caesar’s legion in their game Fallout New Vegas, Bethesda Games objectified and exploited woman in their games for social misfits that were curious and felt the need to play out their Fantasies in exchange for profit.

Why else do you think old video games are always represented as Nintendo and arcade games? Because the history of computer games is one of erotic fantasy and lust of which the likes could not be tolerated in today's society.

Look at moder sties. The first video game modifications always include nudity and sex because computer gamers are obsessed with that kind of stuff. They were conditioned to love it buy the games of the 1990’s. On 11/10/2015 who would be willing to spend their money on the PC anti-slavery, Marxist videogame Fallout 4? At the end of the day it’s about money. But no one really hates the ideas of slavery, because it made this nation, and no one is going to buy that video-game Fallout 4.

On paper it sound good, you walk around trying to improve a post-apocalyptic society while fighting slavery and liberating the underdogs of the new world. But that’s not right. The truth is for a world to begin again there has to be slavery and imperialism.

Some of you like video-games like this, you think in what world is the greatest nation formed off of centuries of slavery and mass genocide. But in time you’ll come to the conclusion that there is no real need for Political Correctness and Slavery is not that bad. When you go to bed to night you will not spread the message of #Fallout4Equality via social media.

This video-game will not become a symbol for the left. And all of the other disturbances that have occurred on the internet in the past weeks over this issues will be resolved and all will return to normal. I have several points that prove why Fallout 4 will not sale in one month, enough copies to beat the two day sales record of Grand Theft Auto V.

And on November 10, 2015 I will prove that black lives, LGBT rights, women’s rights, and all other social injustice hoaxes are non-issues when the most PC videogame of all time doesn't reach a billion dollars in sales on its first week on the shelves. And then we will know that Political Correctness is just an unnecessary joke that we don’t need in our private lives.

They aren’t the majority

In the Culture War between the PC and the Video-game industry, the PC are not just the 1%, but the .0000001%. The social minorities that they would look to for support love to play GTA. That’s why it sold 880 million in just 2 days. And GTA is just one of many video-games. The PC war with the video-game culture, Is as futile as trying to westernize the entire Middle East in 1 year without the use of violence. It’s like trying to peacefully colonize the most diehard, nationalistic, society via PC. It won’t work.

The PC are not attracting the correct audience to their video-games

Most of the PC in the gaming industry are the social majority that prefer RPGs.

Steve Pieczenik & Alex Jones #conspiracy rightwingwatch.org

Pieczenik: Here’s where we get into the intelligence community and what I said a long time ago: When the CIA recruits an individual, particularly a president of the United States, there has to be a psychological deficit and lacunae in their personality. In the case of Bill Clinton, it was the fact his mother was a prostitute, she ran a whorehouse in Hope, Arkansas, and he was nothing but the bastard child of the john.

In the case of Obama, he was known to be a homosexual in Chicago with Rahm Emanuel, who was a trained ballet dancer, and he was recruited by the CIA repeatedly and basically threatened by them and the Muslim Brotherhood and everything else. That’s why the political correctness comes in.

Now, in the case of Hillary Clinton, I’ve known her for years and I’ve known her other family members, she is a well-known lesbian. The reason why she’s been recruited and could be threatened is she’s has a history of lesbian affairs which is relevant only to the fact that it’s a national security problem. [Huma] Abedin may be her lover, Abedin may be her lesbian lover, I could care less. But the point of fact is not one of our presidents, presently or in the future, other than Trump, is a highly compromised candidate.

Jones: And that’s why they hate Trump. He’s not compromised. He’s open about women.

Eugene McCarthy #crackpot macroevolution.net

Okapi: A giraffe-zebra hybrid?

imageOn their rumps and legs, okapis have striping like that of a zebra.

imageThe okapi has a giraffe-like head.

The okapi (Okapia johnstoni), also known as the forest giraffe or zebra giraffe, is a good example of the way theory affects both perception and research activities. Okapis mix traits otherwise seen only separately either in the giraffe or in the zebra, and under ordinary circumstances this fact would constitute strong evidence that okapis are giraffe-zebra hybrids. Moreover, old news reports say that peoples native to the region where the okapi occurs believe it to be a giraffe-zebra hybrid.

And yet it seems no scientist has investigated this possibility. Why? Well, in trees representing accepted notions of evolutionary descent, giraffes and zebras are placed on widely separate branches. So any biologist worth his or her salt will tell you: The two are simply too far apart for giraffe-zebra hybrids to be possible. Thus, it is not surprising that there are no reports of attempts to produce giraffe-zebra hybrids. Experimentation does not occur because theory says it would be useless to try.

imageOkapi tongue

imageGiraffe tongue

The okapi and the giraffe were assigned to the same order (Artiodactyla) because they both have cloven hooves, and to the same family (Giraffidae) because they share certain distinctive features: Both have large eyes and ears, thin lips and a long, extensible tongue that allows them to lick their entire face (even the ears); their backs slope upward from rump to withers; they also share the same dental formula: (i 0/3, c 0/1, pm 3/3, m 3/3) × 2 = 32. Both, unlike any other mammal, have molars with rugose enamel and bony horns that remain covered with skin throughout life (Nowak 1999, vol. 2, p. 1085).

Yet the rump and legs of an okapi are covered with black-and-white stripes exactly like those of a zebra. Perhaps, then, if okapis had solid hooves instead of cloven ones, they would be classified as perissodactyls (Order Perissodactyla) and would be considered more closely related to zebras than to giraffes? An okapi is about the same size as a Burchell’s zebra.

The chromosome count of an okapi is also like that of a zebra, to which it is not supposed to be related, and unlike that of a giraffe. Giraffes have 30 chromosomes (Taylor et al. 1967; Hösli and Lang 1970; Koulisher et al. 1971), whereas okapis have a variable chromosome number of 44-46, depending on the animal in question; most seem to have 2n = 45 (Ulbrich and Schmitt 1969; Hösli and Lang 1970; Koulisher 1978). The chromosome number of Grevy’s zebra is 2n = 46 and plains zebras have 2n = 44 (Benirschke and Malouf 1967). Variation in chromosome count is itself unusual among mammals, but common in hybrids.

Okapis also produce high levels of abnormal sperm, which is consistent with the idea that they are the products of a distant hybrid cross. Thus, Penfold (2007) reports that 52% percent of the spermatozoa produced by these animals are morphologically abnormal. As those authors state, “okapi semen collected by electroejaculation routinely contain high numbers of non-motile and plasma membrane-damaged spermatozoa, apparently unrelated to season or the length of time since the male was housed with a breeding female.”

imageGiraffe and zebra drinking together Giraffe and zebra drinking together at Kruger Park.

It is, of course, well known that giraffes and zebras exist in mixed herds in various parts of Africa, and therefore are in potential breeding contact (these regions include those where okapis occur).

However, zebras are much smaller than giraffes, which might lead one to suppose that they would be physically unable to mate. And yet, hybrids sometimes occur between animals where the disparity in size is even greater. Male Steller sea-lions (Eumetopias jubatus) often mate, and sometimes even successfully hybridize with female California sea-lions. And yet the former average around 1100 lbs while the latter weigh only around 200 lbs., a ratio of 5.5:1 (the female often dies in such encounters) Such cases are nothing unusual in the literature on hybridization. Florio (1983) reports a case of a lion father who weighed 550 pounds (250 kg), while the leopard mother weighed a mere 84 pounds (38 kg), a ratio of 6.54:1.

In the case of a male giraffe 2,628 pounds (1,192 kg) with a female zebra, 770 pounds (350 kg),the weight ratio is only 3.4:1, that is, the difference is less disparate than in either of the two crosses just mentioned.

And this difference would be even smaller with the cross reversed, that is, with a female giraffe and a male zebra. Giraffe females weigh nearly a thousand pounds less than males, while zebra males weigh a bit more than females, which would yield a ratio closer to 2:1, not at all unusual in a hybrid cross. Moreover, giraffes do sometimes lie down, and a male zebra would, of course, have much better access to a recumbent female giraffe.

A final fact consistent with the idea that okapis might be giraffe-zebra hybrids is their rarity at the present day and their absence from the fossil record. Hamilton (1977) says that while giraffes are well-known as fossils, paleontologists have seen no trace of okapis. Zebras, too, are known from fossils (Eisenmann 1992). The IUCN rates the okapi as endangered, although it also states that “there is no reliable estimate of current population size.”

Incel Wiki #quack incels.wiki

Psychiatry
imageimageimageimage

Psychiatry is an instrument of social-control for deviants who aren't in regular jail. In other words, "Society's Sewer". If you deviate from society in any meaningful way and you do not live on your own, expect to meet a psychiatrist at some point in your life.

Metastudies (or studies of studies) have proven antidepressants, for example, to not be clinically significant in the treatment of depression beyond placebo,[1][2] but their actual effects have been proven to be quite harmful in the long and sometimes short-term.

Meeting a psychiatrist

Not all psychiatrists are horrible people. However, if you ever hint that you have suicidal or homicidal ideation, they have legal authority to lock you up temporarily, or, "temporarily" (and you don't want that, trust us). In fact, they also need no real evidence. Courts in psychiatric in cases are heavily biased towards parents and doctors. It is therefore helpful to record your psychiatric sessions (legally) if you must attend them. And better yet, not attend them at all.

If you are 18 and over and in good health, and you think you may be forced to see a psychiatrist because people want you on drugs... MOVE. MOVE NOW. Get out of your house now with food and clothing and take an uber to a friend's house or a homeless tent setup (not a homeless shelter, those places now employ psychiatry). You may need to leave a note on social media posting that it was a voluntary decision of yours and you are not a missing person. Your former caretakers now have no legal authority to force psychiatry on you, even if they want to lie to do so.

Even being homeless is better than the decades of mental torture that psychiatric drugs can inflict on you.

Psychiatry and incels

Most incels, when trying to describe their psychic pain about social situations, they will usually be labled as either schizophrenic or socially anxious, depending on how much time the psychiatrist wants to spend evaluating their situation. Given the treatment almost never involves improving in the area of romantic relationships, and harmful drugs are instead prescribed (which often make dating harder), your life starts spiriling downward. Psychiatrists sometimes prescribe SSRIs to incels as anaphrodisiacs, even though SSRIs cause anorgasmia, not reduced libido.

Psychiatrists will rarely acknowledge inceldom as it's own problem which causes illness. However, this is not the main reason to avoid psychiatrists. "Involuntary singeldom", or, "incel", is not a cult (any more than determinism is) and we don't have members. Psychiatry is harmful to *everyone*.

But my friend got better?

The placebo effect is extremely powerful. Sham surgeries have in some cases beaten real surgeries in double-blind trials. Mental and physical states are profoundly influenced by the placebo effect, especially those characterized by a lack of hope. You or your friend may have noticed though that the *actual* clinically meaningful effects of psychotropic drugs (what are usually labeled "side effects") are profound and often extremely damaging. Best to just take sugar pill, as those have been proven to work via placebo, *even if you know it's a placebo*.
Antidepressants fail to meet clinical significance beyond placebo in treating depression

In metastudies of the effectiveness of antidepressants, according to the NICE criteria of clinical significance (more than 4+ points on the HAM-D depression rating scale, or HRDS), there is not one metastudy that shows that antidepressants are clinically significant in treating depression beyond placebo.

The latest meta-analysis of anti-depressants, here [1], shows that when compiling the results of many different studies, antidepressants did not produce more than an equivalent of a 4 point improvement on the HRDS, meaning the antidepressants were not clinically meaningful in treating depression beyond placebo.

A look at Irving Kirsches dataset reveals only clinical significance at the tail end of the very severely depressed (about 10% of patients). Which only yields a 4.28 HRDS decrease. Fournier et. al 2010 also only found about 10% of patients pass the NICE criteria for a clinically significant response to antidepressants [2]. Just half an hour of treadmill walking for 10 consecutive days is sufficient to produce a clinically relevant and statistically significant reduction in depression (reduction of 6.5 points from baseline on HRDS).[3]. The exercise part aside, the point is that meta-analyses do not show a clinically significant response to antidepressants with the exception of maybe the top 10% most severely depressed patients. And for them, exercise would even work better.

"Monoamine hypothesis"

The description of the cause of abnormal brain states in psychiatry are based on a pseudoscientific, "monoamine hypothesis", which isn't even considered reputable in top universities anymore. The brain is like a computer, and electrical patterns in your brain's circuitry determine mood. But neurotransmitter pathways are only a very small part of that story, and do not even begin to explain the complexity of our brain circuitry. Synapses are merely the spaces between the circuitry. Trying to figure out how to alter complex electrical activity in the brain (feelings) in a productive manner with neurotransmitter pathways is like trying to figure out the patterns of pipes in your city by yelling into your sink.

[lots of anti-psychiatry video clips]

[Lists of anti-psychiatry organisations and crackpots]

NAMI

NAMI is the most well-known mental patient patient "advocacy" group in the United States. In reality NAMI is a front-group for drug companies, receiving inordinate amounts of their funding from psychotropic drug companies. The group advocates forced drugging and involuntary commitment. A prominent psychiatrist who was a member of the American Psychiatric Association once resigned from the APA citing the group, "being in bed", with NAMI, and being critical of NAMI's support of forced drugging[3]. NAMI was initially funded by the royalities of a book by Dr. E. Fuller Torrey, the nation's lead advocate of forced psychiatric drugging.

[lots of anti-psychiatry video clips]

Heathcliff #fundie lionsground.com

Are you seeking for how to reverse the Illuminati Satanic baptism ALS Ice bucket challenge ritual? The ALS Ice Bucket sounds like a harmless challenge for a good cause. But it’s not! If you dig a little bit deeper, you find out it’s about a Satanic baptism ritual.

The Background story

ALS or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a terrible decease that slowly deactivate your body functions step-by-step. If we may believe the story on Wikipedia: From mid-2013 to early 2014 somebody emptied a bucket of water filled with ice cubes over his head while being recorded on camera to collect money for a friend who has been diagnosed for ALS.

You have to challenge a person, the challenged person is required to perform the same ritual within 24 hours and repeat the step. The ALS Ice bucket challenge became a world wide hype on social media, even i did it.

First red flag is: They hide the founder on Wikipedia and i Quote: “The origins of the idea of dumping cold water on one’s head to raise money for charity are unclear”. and quote: “…. a challenge of unknown origin”.

People are able to tell how old a dinosaur is by looking at the bones, we know who wrote the bible ‘but’ we are unable to tell who the founder is of ALS?

Let me tell you about someone who they like to skip in this story. His name is Corey Griffin, co-founder of the ALS Ice Bucket challenge. Responsible person who made the challenge a world wide hype.

Second red flag: He died when he left a very successful ALS fundraiser and “dove off a building at Straight Wharf in Nantucket at 2 a.m. on Aug. 16 and drowned, according to the Boston Globe. ‘He floated to the surface [and] then he sank. He did not come up again,’ the report says. Corey was pronounced dead at 3 a.m. He had helped raise $100,000 for ALS research on the night of his death.’” Corey Griffin appeared to be on a path to great achievements: He was a college hockey player, enjoyed a very successful financial career and was a philanthropist who raised money for children in hospitals and his friend stricken with ALS.

It confounds me as to why Griffin would take such a risk with his life, especially in the dead of night? Very odd. Very bizarre. Very dark.

The video’s depiction of Oprah Winfrey taking the challenge is particularly disturbing, Owens said. “In the name of ALS and the Ice Bucket Challenge’ … because Oprah believes the One True God is jealous of her, and the well-known fact that she denounces Jesus as the only way to God and basically considers herself to be a god, I found this statement to be very cultic in nature.”

In conclusion: “The ALS IBC is ritualistic in nature. People are chosen to undergo a form of water baptism with cultic god Oprah leading the charge ‘in the name of ALS.’”

She has influence over millions, but what does she really believe? Get Josh McDowell’s expose ” God: A Dialogue on Truth and Oprah’s Spirituality”

The ALS IBC is ritualistic in nature. People are chosen to undergo a form of water baptism with cultic god Oprah leading the charge “in the name of ALS.” The Bible is clear: “You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3). Oprah is a god to millions of Americans, and those who follow her doctrine and antics have tossed Jesus off the throne of their hearts – perhaps not intentionally … or perhaps so. Yet by following her seemingly innocent IBC decree, knowingly or not, they have cast Jesus off symbolically.

What about the money? The foundation raised over $94 million in one month, stupendously exceeding the $1.5 million it raised last year. And it continues to rake in approximately $9 million per day. There are concerns about ALS using embryonic stem-cell methods, and the organization is not very clear on which research it will conduct and how any of that translates into advances to combat or cure ALS. This has left some people feeling misused or duped into participating with the IBC.

Why they do it?

To Purify the world before the great human sacrifice, also to test us how good we listen and how good we follow as flock of sheep. Well, very good! First the Ice Bucket challenge and than the Fire challenge.

The “Ice Bucket Challenge” is actually a large ‘Ritual Purification Cleansing’ preparing for the Largest Human Sacrifice in History to usher in the Beast System.

•What if I told you the latest Fire and Ice Challenges are tied to the Illuminati and New World Order’s bold Agenda of the rise of the Fourth Beast System, the Reign of the Anti-Christ?
•What if I told you that depending on how you decided to “cleanse” whether having water dumped on your head or being the dumpee represented turning someone else in or giving yourself up come that time?
•What if I told you the Ice Challenge was a hidden Illuminati code inviting ISIS to Ice Us?
•What if I told you Obama sitting in the “Iron Throne” back in May in a “photo-shopped” White House tweet was in fact God showing us the hour we are living in according to the book of Daniel and Revelation?
•What if?

How to reverse the Satanic baptism ALS Ice bucket ritual?

For almost six months i was figuring out how to reverse, undo or un-baptize myself. I was surprised my local church throw the door in front of me and many others did not answered my mail at all. I don’t worry, karma will deal with them!

The answer is: There is no reverse ritual on the Satanic baptism ritual. The only way to clean yourself from this evil bondage is to do this:

Confess your sin and repent to God. “If you confess your sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive you your sins and purify you from all unrighteousness.” 1 John 1:9. Renounce participation in the devils schemes. Rededicate you life to Jesus.

If you have Jesus in your heart, “greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world” 1 John 4:4. You have authority in the Name of Jesus, so you tell that demon, “I bind you in the Name of Jesus!” Start pleading the Blood of Jesus over your mind, body and heart. And your bed, your room, and even your house. Study Ephesians 6:10-18. It’s about the armour of God. Start putting it on, use your imagination.

“Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.” ~ James 4:7

You must commit to seek God in the Bible and pray on a daily basis. And “from your position in Christ, you must resist the devil, renounce participation in his schemes, confess sin, and forgive those who have offended you.”(The Bondage Breaker)

I hope “How to reverse the Satanic baptism ALS Ice bucket ritual” was helpful. It took me months to find the answer. Thanks to a couple of Christians on Youtube who guided me to the right direction, the bible.

I was so shocked, it changed me forever how i look at the media today. The only one who you can and must thrust is yourself and nobody else, except God.

Here’s a challenge: Follow Jesus, not the masses!

True Player #fundie rooshvforum.com

[Images not included]
MODERN FEMINISM

Sometimes you can’t help but think there must have been divine intervention. The same day I pen my article about why Adelaide women are the best in Australia, I pick up the front page of the paper to see outrage that 500 young Adelaide women have had naked photos of themselves plastered all over an American website.

You may have noticed I didn’t sing the praises of Adelaide women aged 18—25 in my article. That was for good reason. Here is a passage that unfortunately didn’t pass the final ROK edit:

One word of warning: you had better strike while the iron is hot. With feminism destroying women at a truly scary rate all over the world, this could very well be the last generation of desirable Adelaide women. On recent visits I have noticed a disturbing rise in the number of girls aged 18-25 with ugly tattoos and piercings. Obviously, it goes without saying they are addicted to their smartphones. It breaks my heart because many of these girls would be really attractive if they embraced their natural beauty, put on a nice dress, and put down that damn phone.

I truly believe western millennial girls are nightmares, even in sleepy little Adelaide. What we are seeing with so called ”revenge porn” is an example of the disturbing but inevitable consequences of the first generation of women who, brainwashed by feminist propaganda, truly believe they can do no wrong, and that there are no consequences for their actions. Throw in their smart phone addictions and toxic need for constant social media validation and you have a recipe for disaster.

At this rate, we are not too far from a world where every second man’s girlfriend’s or wife’s tits will be plastered all over the net, her slutiness on display for the whole world to see. This is supposed to be your loving life partner, the mother of your children? How can any man these girls meet in the future possibly take them seriously?
A tech-savvy generation? Millennial girls’ behaviour indicates otherwise

fb-addicted1

Young women are so addicted to social media they can’t see the negative effects it has on their lives

The millennial girl’s smartphone obsession is of course the root of their misery, but it’s their lack of intelligence and social awareness that is truly astounding. How can they not get it? Once a photo is put on the internet, it is there forever. Media reporting on this story was incredibly irresponsible. These photos certainly were not “stolen”, as journalists claimed. Whoever got these photos didn’t break into these girls houses, nor were they Peeping Toms who had secretly photographed them without their knowledge or consent. In fact, they had been willingly uploaded to social media or sent directly to the latest bad boy to make their vaginas tingle. From that point onwards, they were totally at the mercy of that bad boy as to what happened next. Some empowerment! Now admittedly putting them on the web for the whole world to see is a pretty low act, but they don’t call them bad boys for nothing. You can bet your bottom dollar these are the guys who are far more likely to receive and distribute “sexts” than the nice guys forever languishing in the friend zone.

Despite all this, I feel sorry for these girls. They have grown up in age where being a slut is glorified and where their peers give as little thought to posting revealing selfies online or sending “sexts” as they do to taking a piss. Unlike women from previous generations, at no point in their lives have they been pulled aside and told in no uncertain terms that being easy reflects poorly on themselves and is likely to be a one way ticket to disaster. It’s not politically correct, you see, and many have been denied a strong father figure by their money-hungry mom who wanted freedom, a divorce and custody. This is why millennial girls are not only narcissistic and slutty, but completely oblivious to how broken they have become, and why they are hopelessly addicted to the crack pipe of Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. All they need to do to break free of this toxic cycle is log off, but unplugging from the vortex would be unthinkable. Next thing you know, BAM, there they are spreading their legs on the net for the whole world to see for the rest of time.
Millennial girls are trapped in a social media vortex

Woman using cell phone on bed

Young women love selfies more than life itself

“Revenge porn” wouldn’t exist if young women weren’t so obsessed with selfies. Sadly, millennial girls are so infatuated with internet “fame” everything else is merely background music. To demonstrate how warped their perspectives are, consider this. What did this girl do when she found out she was on the site? She re-uploaded a photo from the site of her in the shower to her Facebook! Yep, she tried to get even more attention! All this does is draw even more people to check out the website she is supposedly so outraged about. Out of curiosity I looked up her Facebook page, and sure enough, it is selfie after selfie. She is quite hot, but obviously so desperate for fame I can’t help but wonder if she is secretly thrilled she now has a chance to step out of the shadows of her well-known football playing brothers. As the shocking revelation of Dubai Porta Potties showed, millennial women want fame, no matter what the price is.
Women have been betrayed by feminism

PW_ClementineFord

Feminist woofer Clementine Ford.. all for female empowerment, but for God’s sake don’t expect women to exercise self-responsibility

Predictably, critics have directed all their energy into attacking the faceless American creators of this site and furiously denouncing “victim blaming”, rather than spreading the word to young women everywhere that uploading raunchy photos to social media and sexting guys is risky behaviour with potentially very serious consequences. Bottom line: If girls don’t send these pics out, they can’t end up on a site like this. That would put these “shady creeps” out of business permanently. But in the twisted minds of feminists, prevention is never better than cure: don’t teach women to do X, teach men not to do Y. They have always played the victim, abrogated the concept of self-responsibility and denied the reality that women’s actions have potential consequences, and now girls everywhere who were brainwashed to believe exactly that are paying the price.
Is there any hope for young women?

Teens-social-media

Scenes like this will be familiar to us all.. what does it take for young women to put down their phones?

The prospect of having a daughter one day seriously scares the hell out of me. What chance do you have of raising a decent human being, when you are fighting a reckless pro-slut cultural tsunami?

There was a time when the family unit provided the guidance young women needed to develop important values. Unfortunately, with The Decline accelerating this is often impossible. For most girls, any semblance of fatherhood authority has long gone. If they really care for the welfare of girls, mothers and genuinely concerned women need to fill this void and educate them that acting like a slut must be avoided, for this behaviour places them at risk of ending up on sites like this, forever. Is that something they really want? They might also want to consider how driving a strong man out of their daughter’s life might have devastating consequences.
Conclusion

Like so many other modern social problems, feminism is definitely to blame for “revenge porn”. This warped ideology has always irresponsibly promoted the delusional idea that women have all the same rights as men, but without responsibilities or consequences for their actions. They were the ones who encouraged a life of reckless hedonism and narcissism for young women, with no thought for their futures. They were the ones who spun the gross lie that being pumped and dumped by men who couldn’t care less about them is “empowering.” These 500 Adelaide women are just a drop in the ocean of the many girls who are being sacrificed daily at the altar of “female empowerment.” This is what happens when it is politically incorrect to state the obvious: that acting like a slut is dangerous for a woman’s honour, credibility and future happiness.

some incels #sexist reddit.com

image

(notreallyinceliswear)
Male depression: Complete despair, no hope, future is nothing but pointless struggle just to survive alone. Deeply ingrained shame and humiliation, embarrassed to show his face in public because everyone sees what a pathetic failure he is. Puts a bullet in his head because life has literally gotten that bad.

Female depression: In a bad mood due to hangover from all the partying she did the last few nights, feeling lonely due to lack of a steady boyfriend since Chadlite dumped her for cheating on him a month ago. Spends a few hours alone and feels she isn't receiving the attention she is entitled to from prime males. Takes various measures on social media to acquire that attention. Usually starts by posting a "no-makeup" selfie to fish for compliments, but she gets less than 40 likes. Starts posting about her lifelong struggle with mental health and body image to drum up good publicity. Still not getting enough attention especially compared to that bitch Stacy who's getting over a hundred likes on all her vacation bikini pics even though she's a total slut and her boobs aren't even as big as they look in her selfies, ugh fucking bitch. Finally she sees that a sub5 orbiter had the fucking audacity to comment on her no-makeup selfie and that really sets her off. She takes a razor and makes some horizontal cuts on her wrist so she can "accidentally" let people see them to add a layer of mystery to her persona. She'll show them to the therapist Daddy pays for, and have them legitimized officially as a suicide attempt she can reference in the future when discussing her difficult life and mental health problems.

(JFLmaxx)
Mac Miller was known to be insecure. He coped with these troubles with substance abuse.

•Whorianna Grande quickly got with another guy after they broke up.

•One day on Twitter, she reported the gargantuan size of her new BFs cock which was likely an attempt at emasculating Miller.

•Miller already having issues and perhaps being heartbroken accidentally roped while coping on drugs.

The damage women inflict is insidious.

Teehee.

(shetoldmeto80)
It is absolutely staggering how much women expect men to take care of their emotional and mental issues... whilst men are expected to just "man up" when faced with similar (or often worse) hardships.

Full disclosure: I was with a woman with depression for ... a long time... took care of her, tried to make her smile etc... in the end one time I broke down in a massive way (because I was seriously ill and thus exhausted), she went straight to Chad to tell him I was a pussy (I still have the logs of their conversations) then proceeded to fuck another Chad

(IndraMaheshwar)
Now imagine if a male celebrity dumped his depressed girlfriend and went on to fuck another Stacy in the most public way possible, and then she roped. The very same cunts on social media would absolutely SLAUGHTER him and ruin his reputation for millenia.

(TruthInBlack)
Ariana Grande's crimes against men are unforgivable. She is directly responsible for Mac Miller's death and she knows this so she writes some stupid ass song to pretend like she cared. She will burn in hell.

(hhhh__)
When a woman senses weakness in a man the caveman part of her brain signals that she, and most importantly her offspring, are at risk. Jfl at people that think billions of years of evolution can be erased by a couple thousand years of civilization.

(anewcenturysrecord)
"Women are worthless degenerate infants whose lives are so easy they bore themselves into a depression and you have to be her man servant until she decides to stop being a lazy fucking cunt. If you slave away hard enough she might not leave you for the next Chad who comes along!"

(Former-Incel-User)
This is why you should never be sad or weak around a girl. Only be angry or show zero emotion. Always be selfish, narcissistic and psychopathic, but sprinkle in a bit of love to keep her hooked. Cheat on her. Fuck with her head. Do not provide for her outside of your cock.

Hell it would be more attractive to laugh at your girl for being depressed than it would be to be beta and take care of her.

(notreallyinceliswear)
Women need to be treated like children. This is basically well-known in species memory that they are irrational, retarded and insane by human standards. The problem emerged when we started patronizing these grown children and telling them they are grownups too.

Ken Ham #fundie answersingenesis.org

The Secularist Media War Against the Ark Continues

Recently, a number of articles in the mainstream media, on blogs, and on well-known secularist group websites have attempted to spread propaganda to brainwash the public into thinking our Ark Encounter attraction is a dismal failure. Sadly, they are influencing business investors and others in such a negative way that they may prevent Grant County, Kentucky, from achieving the economic recovery that its officials and residents have been seeking.

In one sense, such negative, misleading, and outright false reporting doesn’t worry me. As Christians, we know we will receive opposition like this—and after 40 years in Bible-upholding ministry, I have become used to such antics by those who oppose us. Nowadays, it seems very few reporters in the secular media actually want to report facts regarding what they cover as news. When it comes to reporting on theologically conservative Christians like those of us at AiG, whose ideology they strongly oppose, many writers have an agenda to undermine Christianity as they file their stories.

I’ve found that not only do these kinds of reporters generally do very poor or lazy research, they will actually make things up for their agenda purposes. They often just quote others, who themselves have quoted yet others, who have quoted even yet others. Urban legends have now been created around our life-size Noah’s Ark, mixing misleading and untrue statements gathered from a variety of sources, often not using primary sources but hearsay.

A Recent Case in Point

Let me give you a recent example. Reporter Linda Blackford wrote a recent front-page article on the Ark Encounter for the secular newspaper the Lexington Herald Leader of Kentucky (the state’s second largest paper). Her article was titled “Town Expected Flood of Business after Noah’s Ark Opened. So Far, It’s a Trickle.”1

After reading that headline and then her article, I was convinced that she (and probably her editor) had an agenda even before she began her research and writing. She was determined to convince readers that the Ark Encounter wasn’t successful and that it hadn’t had much of a positive economic impact or created jobs in Grant County. As she ignored overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the reporter misquoted the few people she did interview and deliberately wrote an article that hid the whole truth about the tremendous economic impact that the Ark Encounter has had on all of Northern Kentucky. Her motivation? Well, because her newspaper has been known for antagonism toward anything Christian, and AiG has experienced this agenda from the paper over the years, what’s occurred here is yet another example of its anti-Christian bias.

[...]

Intolerant Atheists

The Herald-Leader isn’t the only secular media outlet spreading such maligning anti-AiG propaganda. Many secular bloggers and organizations like the Freedom From Religion Foundation and Americans United for Separation of Church and State have produced videos and/or printed articles filled with misinformation and deliberate falsehoods in their attempt to hide the truth about the success of the Ark.

Many articles, for example, have actually stated that the city of Williamstown, where the Ark is located, is liable for the $62 million dollar bond offering that was part of the funding for the Ark. That’s simply a lie. Answers in Genesis is totally liable for that bond offering, which states:

The Series 2013 Bonds shall not be general obligations of the Issuer but special and limited obligations payable solely from the amounts payable under the loan agreement and from funds and property pledged pursuant to the indenture. The Series 2013 Bonds and the interest payable thereon do not now and shall never constitute indebtedness of the Issuer or the Commonwealth of Kentucky within the meaning of the Constitution or the Statutes of the Commonwealth, and neither the Issuer, the Commonwealth of Kentucky nor any political subdivision thereof shall be liable for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Series 2013 Bonds or for the performance of any pledge, mortgage, obligation or agreement created by or arising under the indenture or the Series 2013 Bonds from any property other than the trust estate. Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the Issuer, the Commonwealth of Kentucky or any political subdivision thereof is pledged to the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Series 2013 Bonds.3

Yes, the bonds were issued through the city, but the city is not responsible for one cent of this offering. Some articles even say the bond offering is part of the TIF—which is simply ridiculous! The amount of misinformation and outright lies about the Ark project is staggering.

Why so many lies and misinformation? Simply because we are in a spiritual battle, and the intolerant secularists are so upset with such world-class attraction like the Ark (and Creation Museum) that publicly proclaim a Christian message. They will resort to whatever tactics they deem necessary to try to malign the attractions.

Of course, negative reporting and commentary result in more advertising for our facilities! As I witness all this opposition and see such opposition backfiring, I am reminded again of what Joseph declared and how it applies to us today:

As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today. (Genesis 50:20)

Edmund_Kemper #psycho #sexist #pedo incels.co

[Serious] Am I weird for having fantasies about cannibalism?

When a foid on reddit admits to having rape fantasies, people tell her it’s normal. People think BDSM or whatever is okay. But I’m a freak if I fantasize about cannibalism once in a while because I see a young woman’s soft smooth youthful skin? Sure I don’t get into the fantasies too much and hell, sometimes I fantasize about it sarcastically. But sometimes I see a young woman’s soft youthful skin and her soft feminine eyes and I kinda think “is she going to taste good if I eat her for dinner?”. Sometimes I feel a bit hungry if I see a landwhale despite an absence of sexual attraction because their fatness makes them look like they’re yummy food.

Sure, it’s a bit sick, but I won’t act on it, nor do I want to, the fantasy is very temporary. Also, anyone who puked while reading this is a pussy and isn’t a real man.

kinda weird ngl

Up to 9% of men have fantasized about sex with prepubescent children and 33% fantasized about rape, and this is weird?

Yes, its weird.

And what about people here fapping to naked 10 year old anime girls?

yes it's very weird stop coping

Cope. People here fantasize about weirder shit

What's wrong with fapping to 2D girls? They are not real.
People who fap to real 10 year old girls are creepy and weird.

At least cannibalism is a high T manly thing to do

These numbers are probably lower than they actually are because men would not tell the truth when asked a question like that.

The bohemian lifestyle of the average foid would probably make them taste gross. Give me a roast beef over a roastie plz.

66% of men have said in a survey that they’ve fantasized about young girls

There's an interesting video about what human meat tastes like, apparently it's like veal

So a young woman’s soft hairless skin actually would taste good?

I hope you're right.

When I think of evil, I think of a serial killer or a terrorist, not a guy who has consensual sex with jb teens

What makes me mad the most about all that agecucked shit is the hypocrisy. Yes, many actions related to porn and/or sex with underage people are immoral. According to Jesus, even coveting people who are not your husbands/wives sexually is immoral. I agree. But why the focus only on agecucked shit when the world nowadays is pretty much Sodom and Gomorrah but on a global scale?

The answer is feminism.

When I watch supervillain shows and movies, none of the villains are into sex with minors, they just destroy the world and kill people

you think the fraction of men who've had rape fantasies is less than a third? LOL

No they fantasized about PERPETRATING the rape

I think it comes off as a bit weird, but if it remains just a fantasy, I don't see a problem with it, tbh.

Some foids look like food

don't you find the human body fascinating ? i would love to explore it personally, but that would require a body, and im not gonna kill lol.

I think female skin is tasty if I try eating it for dinner

jeremyjimmy #sexist reddit.com

(Note: This is an amalgam of three different comments)

You'd think that people from IncelTears would be more angered by these. They're complaining about their privilege.

Also what happened to them being able to gauge personality? I'm not an incel but the blackpill idea is like 90% dead on. I don't know why people are so dishonest and want men to be so unprepared as teens entering the dating world by feeding them endless lies about female nature. Women are completely prepared for what men will want from them and what drives them. Meanwhile the second anyone with any experiences starts to nail down female sexuality the entire western media starts bucking like a horse with a rubber band around it's balls.

edit: Also I haven't seen anyone make this point before but extremist feminists have done everything that they claim to hate about incels. Yet why aren't they going after them? There have been feminist murderers, terrorists and sites actually full of women aborting their male babies, planning evil shit to do to their male children and on and on it goes. I mean out in public women were saying "kill all men" on Twitter. Nobody really cared. In fact from my experience feminists have done a lot worse than incels. Most incels are just harmless guys venting about the lies they were told as children.

.
.
.

I know from personal experience about all this shit, then I found incels and saw that they have it all down to a science. I guess I'm "chad lite" on the ratings scale so even with crippling social anxiety would get girls and even my friends girls kept trying to fuck me which started to make me look down on them. (You hear comedians and musicians talk about this, married women trying to fuck them and just saying "so?" when they say "but you're married".) Then I went through a stage where I got really sick, lost all my physique and looked terrible. I'm not exaggerating when I say that women started treating me COMPLETELY different. They'd actually give me looks of disgust. My friends noticed too.

Then I got better, worked out, got everything back to how it was and suddenly strange girls are being nice again. One who was horrible to me even suddenly started asking a friend if I was single. It turned me into a complete pessimist. But if someone would've told me when I was younger the truth about female sexuality it wouldn't have bothered me at all. Girls being attracted to me would say I was funny and they liked that I had various talents. Meanwhile when I looked like shit they stopped laughing at my jokes and didn't care about my talent or intelligence. Weird huh?

Male sexuality is well known, it's part of our culture to understand it. Meanwhile female sexuality is shrowded in mystery and called "complicated". We're animals. It's not complicated. I fucking can't stand how men can't explore and discuss this stuff without all being called terrorists or something insane like that. Meanwhile feminists say "kill all men" feminists make bomb threats, murder people, cut men's dicks off and if you group them in with feminists you get the old no true Scotsman fallacy. "They're not true feminists." Oh right, then that one guy who said something about incels online isn't really an incel. It's all so frustrating. Yet they sit there with these puzzled looks, wondering why men are suddenly all being so mean. If it was women rising up like this they'd try to understand, look for the root cause and fix it, the cause of negative female behavior is always external. (Abusive father/husband/single motherhood is tough!) With men it's always internal. (Toxic masculinity/he's just evil/a psychopath etc.) But if it's guys then it's just inherent as if men can't be influenced by the outside world.

It's all so fucking petty and will have to come to a head somewhere. Things will HAVE to start moving back the other way because they're becoming too unstable. I was honestly stunned when I found out about groups like Incel Tears. They've found some of the most lonely, depressed people on Earth and are attacking them for making some offensive jokes. People in terrible situations cope with dark humor, it's pretty much well known. It really is just an excuse to bully these guys. I think all of this is instinctual and that people try to rationalize it afterwards. This is the case with almost all beliefs and behavior. People react based on emotion and animal instinct and then try to act rationally after the fact. People HATE weak guys, they mock them, people want to help weak women and women in need.

Like I remember asking a feminist what she thought about a 14 year old guy whose teacher raped him, got pregnant and had the child. He then had to pay child support at age 18. If he DIDN'T PAY HIS RAPIST HE'D GO TO PRISON. I got called a rape apologist. There's zero sympathy for men. Meanwhile Muslim women who get raped and imprisoned on the technicality of adultery are seen as victims who need to be saved. I want to save both yet I'm the fucking rape apologist. I'd love to know if there's any kind of science exploring how people react to men and women in various situations because I'm convinced that all of this insane behavior is to do with reproduction and protecting offspring in the past. None of it makes any sense in today's culture but it just FEELS wrong to say that so people hang onto it. It's all a fucking mess.

.
.
.

True. And those in the center just learn to become content with their existence and make themselves as busy as possible. It's like with depression. Depressed people perceive reality FAR more accurately then regular people. I guess the black pill would be depressed people and the blue pill regular people.

I think you might be right about things going too far. What I should've said is that if they don't move back they'll probably collapse which will fix things anyway. Awareness can still be raised, we see groups like MGTOW growing and also a curious thing that people overlook is a lot of chad lites and "normies" joining incel forums just to be able to post. There's a good reason for that, because most people have noticed this stuff but either haven't been able to put it into words or they feel like they have nobody to talk to about it.

You're right about experiencing both sides. I'd never really thought about this stuff until I got those disgusted looks. I guess it's similar to that experiment where that woman disguised herself as a man for a year or something and suddenly found out that most of what we're told about guys is bullshit and that she was treated like shit on sight by most women. I think she actually had to go to therapy afterwards lol.

I've been thinking of making a Youtube channel for a while. I've been interested in this stuff for years among other subjects so I might give it a go. I think I can present it in a way where regular people won't instantly switch off.

mylifeistrash #sexist incels.co

Fetishes for men = lowering your standards to the lowest possible levels. That's all.

Men develop fetishes when they can't get what nature wants for them to get, a young, healthy woman who isn't fat.

So he starts getting into landwhales, then older women, then cuck shit, being a sub to a "strong woman", etc. etc. and finally tranny shit.

It just means he has shitty genes so he has keep selling himself at a lower price until something finally wants him.

Yoko Mada AKA randomyoko2 #fundie japan-forward.com

(If you needed further convincing that non-white supporters of Trump are crazy, here's an interview with rather well-known japanese right-wing youtube personality, Yoko Mada, known as randomyoko2 on youtube.)

With the notable exception of author and former television announcer Yoshiko Sakurai, the right-leaning camp in Japan has long been a man’s domain. Not anymore. Yuriko Koike is governor of Tokyo, Tomomi Inada is minister of defense, and Mio Sugita is a rising star in parliamentary politics from Kobe. These women are leading the conservative charge inside the political world.

On the internet, though, no conservative is busier, more popular—or funnier—than Yoko Mada, known to her legions of fans as “Random Yoko.”

Mada was born in Fukuoka, Japan, in 1985. A graduate of Kansai Gaidai University in Osaka majoring in English, Mada began posting videos to YouTube in 2006. In 2011, she won the first YouTube NextUp award. Her YouTube channel on politics and history, randomyoko2, has more than 50,000 subscribers and has been viewed more than 6.5 million times. She has appeared in numerous print, online, and television outlets, and has published a book on the subject of patriotism: Shin Aikokuron.

.
.
.

Q: That is truly impressive. You are increasingly becoming a respected pundit on historical and political issues. Were you interested in those things from a young age?

A: No again! I was basically non-political in college. I was actually anti-Japanese, to tell you the truth. I wanted to cast off my Japanese identity and become American in fashion, speech, mannerisms, everything. I wanted to be able to choose my own country, regardless of where I was born and raised. I like Americans. They’re down to earth, they give you their opinions directly. Even American women have strong views and just come right out and tell you what they think. I liked American independence of thought and expression.

As a typical product of the Japanese education system, I was indoctrinated to dislike Japan. I took in the anti-Japanese propaganda from the schools and the media, and I believed it.

Q: In your book, you appear on the cover in a kimono. You obviously changed your mind about Japan somewhere along the way! When did that happen?

A: It was in 2012. It happened almost overnight. I saw on the news that Chinese people were rioting in the PRC over the Senkaku Islands. I couldn’t understand why. Their actions were only harming their own country—it seemed counterproductive. It was clearly a ginned-up controversy orchestrated by the Chinese government. Anybody could see that. I asked my father what was going on, and he told me. I was amazed.

My father is a very conservative man. He has a whole library of books on history and politics. I always made fun of him for that, and thought he should just get rid of all the books that he had read and that were just collecting dust. But after the Chinese riots, I wanted to know the history that had led to that point, so I went into my father’s library and read everything in it on politics and history. Everything. I chose a different topic each day and plowed through volume after volume.

Q: Just like when you learned English grammar in one week.

A: Yes. I used to think that politics and history were beyond my understanding—too complicated, too involved. But as I read I began to see things very clearly. Shoichi Watanabe-sensei’s books in particular were invaluable. It all made sense. As Japanese, we have all been lied to. I felt betrayed, by the media, by the education system. I was a teacher’s pet in school and I used to love NHK. Looking back, I can see that I just blindly accepted ideology as fact. Almost everyone in Japan did, and does, the same thing. Until recently.

Q: One of your most powerful videos is called “Aikokushin,” “patriotism.” When did you make that?

A: It was late in 2012, I believe. After the turmoil of realizing that so much of what I thought I knew had been false, I had to get off my chest the way I really felt. That video got picked up by other outlets and really seems to have caught on.

Q: Your political views changed. What about you, personally?

A: I haven’t changed as a person, although I’ve come to see the world in a completely different way. Also, by discovering the truth about the past, about Japan, I was able to embrace being Japanese for the first time in my life. I no longer wanted to become an American. I was suddenly proud—and grateful—to be Japanese.

It was from that point that I wanted to work with the US, with patriotic Americans, to fight back against the left-wing brainwashing we all receive through the schools and media in both countries.

Q: You are a big supporter of Donald Trump. When did you start following him?

A: It was actually soon after he announced his candidacy, around September of 2015. When he began to speak of the US-Japan alliance in the summer of that year, I realized that Trump and his supporters in the US were Japanese conservatives’ natural allies. I knew that Trump was serious, even though he was dismissed by nearly everyone in the political establishment. Trump was going to fight them, fight the globalists and the politically-correct powerful elite. We were fighting the same fight in Japan. Making America great again in the way Trump was talking about would help Japan become great again, too.

Q: You seem to have come full circle since your school-age years.

A: I loved the US when I was younger, but not in the right way. The globalists always tell us—and I thought this way, too—that we can become better friends with people in other countries by throwing away our own national identities. I hated being Japanese. I hated being Asian. I hated being a woman, even. I was a tomboy and thought that I could get to know boys better by being more like them. That is just one silly example, but it shows how much socialism, communism, cultural Marxism, Wilsonianism, anti-traditionalism have come to dominate both Japan and the US.

Q: Your eyes have really been opened, it seems.

A: Yes. What happened was that I became an adult. I learned to know and love and tell the truth. I accepted who I am. I stopped being a feminist and became a woman. It was as simple as that. I used to suffer from depression. I was always trying to stamp out who I am inside. Now I am me, and I am happy.

I want to be a role model to everyone else in Japan. Our ancestors were very sophisticated. They knew how to survive in the world by learning other languages, learning about other cultures and ideas, without throwing away their own Japanese heart and soul. One can speak English without becoming American. One can support the US-Japan alliance as a Japanese. We need to be equals with other countries. We cannot always be masochistic about who we are.

I see myself pushing the WAKE UP button inside of Japan. There is nothing more convincing than truth.

Kevin Weinberg #sexist buzzfeed.com

I have no idea how this is even a fetish, but leave it to disgusting, fun-hating, life-ruining, soulless feminist cunts to find some niche fetish and DEMAND that men stop viewing it.

I'm not deying this is a weird, hilarious fetish: because it is. But the very idea that you've got these women saying, "NO! You're not allowed to touch yourself in the privacy of your own home while thinking about this because MY FEELINGS SAY SO! YOU'RE *ONLY* ALLOWED TO MASTURBATE TO 700LB LANDWHALES WITH RAINBOW HAIR!"

Fuck off, feminists. No one in the world likes you, including YOU.

Alain Soral #racist timesofisrael.com

A French court on Thursday sentenced far-right Holocaust denier Alain Soral to one year in prison for insulting a magistrate and making anti-Semitic comments on his website.

On the site, which is called “Equality and Reconciliation,” Soral wrote that Jews “are manipulative, domineering and hateful.”

Soral, 60, has been convicted multiple times of incitement to hatred over a constant stream of anti-Semitic comments over the years. His last conviction was in December in a defamation case. The Paris Court of Appeal fined him 4,000 euros ($4,500) for producing and selling on his website a poster targeting Jews.

“We will continue to prosecute Mr. Soral as long as he makes anti-Jewish remarks,” said attorney Ilana Soskin, representing the International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism, which brought the latest complaint against Soral.

Soral was also sentenced for insulting a female magistrate, saying he had “never heard so many lies and dishonesty out of the mouth of a woman, and I have known prostitutes.”

The sentence marks the first serious punishment for the far-right provocateur, according to Richard Malka, an attorney representing the magistrate.

The French Union of Jewish Students tweeted praise for the court’s decision Thursday against “this little propagandist of hatred.”

In 2016, a French court slapped Soral with a $13,000 fine and a suspended prison sentence of six months for saying the Nazis should have finished killing the Jews of Europe.

The sentence was over Soral’s Facebook post a year earlier about Serge and Beate Klarsfeld, two anti-racism activists who helped track down dozens of Nazi war criminals.

“This is what happens when you don’t finish the job,” Soral wrote about an article on a state honor conferred on the Klarsfelds by Germany.

A judge found Soral, who has long been a well-known writer on the French far-right and an ally of the anti-Semitic comedian Dieudonne M’bala M’bala, guilty of “justifying war crimes and crimes against humanity.” It marked only one of Soral’s multiple convictions for minimizing or mocking the Holocaust.

The judge also ordered Soral to pay 5,000 euros, or about $5,600, to each of the Klarsfelds and 2,000 euros, or $2,250, to the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism, which then too filed the complaint against Soral.

goydivision #psycho #sexist #ableism incels.co

[Experiment] Amputee fetish, or "acrotomophilia", and why it is the most refined of all fetishes

Of course I am only talking about quad amputees.

A woman without arms or legs is an ideal girl. It is easy to make her your bitch. Best of all, she cannot resist. She has no arms to claw you with. She has no legs to run away from you. She can scream, yes, but she cannot run or fight back. It is easy to make her your bitch.

An amputee bitch is completely reliant on you. She needs you to feed her, clean her, clothe her. Without you, she will rot and die. This also adds an added degree of power, from you, the guy, over the girl. It makes her obedient, because she knows that you can just leave her there to rot, and she can't take care of herself.

Of course, this is only for quad amputees. I feel nothing but disgust for those who aren't cute little nuggets.

Guykild #sexist incels.co

Weird. I consider myself a moderate. I don't put 100% of the blame on women at all. I really don't. At least half of the problem are cucks that spend their money on things like onlyfans and male feminists. They're half of the problem. I'm pretty sure I've stated this before as most of the things we're angry about and the reason we're in the situation we're in right now is because of those cucks.

Where's my ban?

I'm also not interested in enslavement either. I don't care of it's a female or anything as it just seems like too high maintenance in general. There are reasons I don't have pets like that. That and I don't like dogs.

I think I'm very moderate as while I can get really angry and annoyed; I'm not too extreme in what I say. I might have a few extreme ways of thinking, but not as some I've seen on here. I will never get it, but all I want is a girl to like my company, to hug, kiss, have a family with, and play games with. I really don't think that's much to ask for as I think that's a humane way of thinking.

Cucks are more than half thevproblem. Feminist are incapable of mounting a movement without male support

They're not. They only able to do so because males support and allow it. It's not females that decided to destroy things like Terminator Dark Fate. The females in the movie? Yes, but it was males that supported it. It's the same thing as Black Lives Matter shit where the majority are white and not black. Male feminists, which are also cucks, hold up a torch for the feminists in the hopes of getting sex and help push their movement.

If men said nothing, most of this shit would go away after a while by now. You know another thing that help this? Traps. Even those males are getting more rights than females and females getting pissed because a lot of those same male support are supporting them.

Nothing would get anywhere without male support.

MAP Biology #sexist mapbiology.wordpress.com

The porn site motherless.com allows users to create their own groups that other people can view and post in. Before they got strict these were the top ten groups:

1. Young
2. Stickam
3. Incest
4. Jailbait
5. Daughters
6. Teen
7. deutsche teens
8. little puff nipples and hairless pussys
9. School Girls
10. Very Cute Only

The “Young” group was mostly filled with girls about 14. If there were no legal restrictions that’s what the porn industry would be using.

RealRice #sexist incels.co

Hmm, well let's think about it logically.
I cannot think or comprehend of anything more cucked than having a daughter. Honestly, think about it rationally. You are feeding, clothing, raising and rearing a girl for at least 18 years solely so she can go and get ravaged by another man. All the hard work you put into your beautiful little girl - reading her stories at bedtime, making her go to sports practice, making sure she had a healthy diet, educating her, playing with her. All of it has one simple result: her body is more enjoyable for the men that will eventually fuck her in every hole.
Raised the perfect girl? Great. Who benefits? If you're lucky, a random man who had nothing to do with the way she grew up, who marries her. He gets to fuck her tight pussy every night. He gets the benefits of her kind and sweet personality that came from the way you raised her.
As a man who has a daugher you are LITERALLY dedicating at least 20 years of your life simply to raise a girl for another man to enjoy. It is the ULTIMATE AND FINAL cuck. Think about it logically