Similar posts

Edmund_Kemper #wingnut #transphobia #sexist incels.co

(More from this thread bashing FSTDT)

KeithInc

this retard thinks he can handle being called a bigot and therefore he supports trannies using the women's room because it's the right thing to do. i'm sure if this fag lived 10 years ago, he would've thought this tranny bathroom thing is insane. he thinks it isn't difficult being called a bigot. well, i dare him to condemn the tranny bathroom thing on twitter, and he will be the victim of a viral call-out culture tweet and be harassed by tons of leftists on there, while if he defends it, he'll be praised on there and maybe only a few right-wingers will attempt to hassle him. he should try condemning the tranny bathroom thing on a viral video and he could get doxxed and cyberbullied to death. also being called by a nigger lover by a few people isn't as bad because most people won't hate you for respecting black people. many people WILL hate you if you oppose this trans bathroom shit. when you're taught by the norm that you're an evil monster if you oppose certain "rights", you're gonna support these "rights" out of fear. i know for a fact he'd oppose this trans bathroom thing 10 years ago. and he claims to have a wife. jfl i bet he doesn't. he's probably just some dumb 20 year old pretending to be in his 30s

Skida

this fag says "iT's NoNe oF yOuR BuSiNeSs wHaT BaThRoOm tHeY uSe" yes it is. the reason why trannies with cocks using the women's room or trannies with vaginas using the men's room is controversial is NOT because people are "bigots" it's because we seperate mens room and womens room because of difference in genitals NOT difference in gender/chromosomes. a person with a penis and a person with a vagina sharing the same bathroom is bad because of privacy issues, safety issues, etc. an adult with a penis shouldn't use the same bathroom with a 11 year old girl with a vagina all by herself. what's next? make all bathrooms shared by men and women and make all locker rooms, etc shared by men and women? it is our business because if a man walks into the women's room, women will feel uncomfortable. i'm sure many will feel uncomfortable if a trans woman walked in (but many women wouldn't admit that).

Timjer

"we don't care about you incels, sweety" then why do you post about us? and this faggot thinks IT means pennywise jfl.

(later post)
Jfl at this post-wall roastie

"Swede? Is he talking about me?

Well, I’ve said a lot of things here, so I might have commented on him as well. I doubt that I’m “bluepilled” though, and I’m clearly not a fag. I’m more of a fag-hag…

I accept homosexuals and transgender people because they exist, and are not harmful to anyone else. I’d never write like that with every other letter a vowel, I’d get a cramp in my 50-year-old fingers.

As I call myself SWEDE, whatever AMERICANS approve of or not is clearly not my business. Of course, I care, and I can protest, but I can’t vote on it.

I probably said I WANTED to resist Kim Jong-un, but I don’t know if I would dare. I don’t want to end up like Sophie Scholl in the Weiße Rose.

Ancient Greece didn’t just have teen boys fucking adult men, it had long-term relationships between men of the same age in the army, and in other parts of society.

Ordinary men in history have very seldom married “jb” (jailbait, I guess) girls, as ordinary men needed a house-keeper; someone to organize the home and delegate to the servants what to do. A 12-14-year-old girl can’t do that! As second or third wife; yes, perhaps. Royalty, who needed heirs rather than life-partners, sure, but they were often BOTH small children when they were betrothed to each other.

I KNOW teens, I know that the brain is not fully mature until somewhere around 25 to 30. If anything, people grow up faster now, with better nutrition. Children are ALLOWED to stay children longer now, than before 1900, but that doesn’t mean they were ready and able for it then. After all, it took around a million years to reach the first billion people, but it took only two centuries, after that, to get to 7,7 billion people."

This foid claims to be 50 years old LOL. what 50 year old woman posts on a forum making fun of other people? she's probably saying that to appear "mature" and "wise". she's probably 20. and then she says she accepts lgbt people because they deserve respect, when she probably would've thought of them as "freaks" back in the 50s. and then she says it was rare for jb foids to marry in history when that's BS. if you look up marriage in ancient greece, girls DID marry 14/15 to men twice their age. just because homosexuality/pederasty existed back then doesn't mean men marrying jb foids never happened. also, sex between 2 males back then doesn't mean men married each other back in ancient greece. in ancient egypt, girls usually married at age 12-15 and boys married at usually 15-20. in ancient israel, girls typically married at age 12-13. in the early meiji period, women in japan usually married at 16. in 1371, most 16 year old girls were married and many 15 year olds were too. in the early 1900s, the average age for indian girls married was 13 and it was 20 for boys. before the industrial revolution, in regions like india, china and east europe, many teen girls married to older men.

and then swedes says "jB fOiDs CaN't hAnDLe bEiNg wiVeS". teenagers today maybe that's the case but teens back then grew up a lot faster. this teen brain thing is a MYTH. i've read about how the teen brain is NOT the cause of immature/reckless behavior and that the behavior causes the immature brain and that teens actually act immature because we infantilize them and treat them like kids. laws restrict teens' adult rights didn't appear until the 20th/21st centuries. teens used to be much more mature back in the day.

check out these urls about the teen brain myth: https://drrobertepstein.com/pdf/Epstein-THE_MYTH_OF_THE_TEEN_BRAIN-Scientific_American_Mind-4-07.pdf The Danger of Treating Teens Like Children Are the Brains of Reckless Teens More Mature Than Those of Their Prudent Peers?

now anyways, she once said that people in the 50s were more "live and let live" than i think. ok go back to the 50s and date a black person in public. go ahead. see how it ends.

here's the link: 3$QD8PZ6JVM46

Edmund_Kemper #sexist #transphobia incels.co

[RageFuel] Bluepilled fags try to argue against me on fstdt

This bluepilled faggot named Swede reads that I said most people like him only agree with what everyone else believes and how if he lives in a society where society had different values his values would be different

then he says “i aCcEpT hOmOs aNd TrAnNiEs BeCaUsE iT’S rIgHt” no you don’t. And then he says in the 50s people were still pretty live and let live yeah go back to that era and kiss another man in public or kiss a black person and you’d get beaten up or yelled at. If he seriously thinks he would’ve accept homos back then he’s wrong. He would’ve hated them back then. And only 4% of Americans approved to interracial marriage back then. This retard cuck thinks he’d be part of that 4%. He thinks he’d resist Kim jong un if he lived in North Korea or would’ve resisted Hitler if he lived in nazi Germany when only a tiny percent of Germans did that. Then he says marrying jb foids wasn’t common back in Ancient Greece because pederasty happened back then. Just because teen boys fucked adult men back then doesn’t mean adult men didn’t marry jb foids. Several sources say girls usually married in their mid-teens to a man twice their age and then he says they were prolly bad wives back then because they were young teens even though teens grew up faster back then. And the teen brain thing is a myth (look it up)

keep an eye on this bluepilled website
Edmund_Kemper #wingnut
here’s the link

I hate the openness of the 21st century.
We allow too much degeneracy.

If he lived in the 50s he would’ve hated homos

Most likely.

Let’s be honest. The only reason why people approve of trannies with cocks using the women’s room is because we’re gonna be labeled “bigots” and get hassled if we don’t approve of it. 10 years ago nobody would’ve approved of it because they were allowed to disapprove

imagine thinking that trannies are a legit thing

Trannies are the most annoying retards online especially that sjw trannyfag Sam Collins

there is no tranny
trannies are males, even if they think otherwise

High IQ

Do you go out of your way to find these faggots? I don't encounter them nearly as often.

I heard of that forum so I check em once in a while

That place seems just as soy as Reddit. What a nightmare.

It’s like another clone of IT

Caamib #pedo #psycho rape.is

About 4 years ago I was banned from Reddit after saying I might want to sleep with my daughter when she turns 12 if I can find her at the time. At that time, I was the highest rated moderator at r/incels subreddit. This subreddit was an offshoot of r/truecels, which I've moderated since January 2016 - for about 6 months. During that time these subs grew from tiny, insignificant specs on Reddit that had 50 or so subscribers to subreddits everybody was talking about.

After my ban, partially due to my bad choices of moderators, where I choose borderline retarded people like dsar, these subs suffered a sharp decline in quality after I left and became filled with insane, poorly educated and unreasonable scum. See, my moderation policy was never about keeping out "normies", "femoids" or whatever. Noncels and women participated there, but they had to adhere to the same rules everybody else had to. Terms like normies were barely beginning to emerge and I was using them in a different context . This wasn't a term for anybody who ever had sex like these freaks use it now but for "normal" people who weren't into politics much and who never had any trouble getting women throughout their lives. Nobody called women "femoids" there yet.

It was my ban that led to incel sites developing in such an awful manner - from what were once inclusive places where everybody who adhered to reasonable rules could participate to current echo chambers of very crazy people. And it had been my mistake that things turned out that way.

Anyway, that is all history now.

In this post, I will address some of the complaints people made about my daughter idea. Of course, I can't address the usual "but she's your daughter !" nonsense, as it lacks any substantial argument. But there were some people who expressed actual arguments against my idea, so I will attempt to tackle them here.

The age argument

This is a tired old argument that somebody is 12 "can't consent" because of their immaturity. It's the most common argument used. This argument is so well accepted today that it's now way outside of Overton window to question it. But this argument forgets that many historical legislatures, like canon law, had the aoc at 12 and that as late as in 1995 Spanish criminal code established the aoc at 12 (which had sadly been reversed by now). Ages of consent in Europe - Wikipedia

Were all those legislators just "pedophiles"?

From a standpoint of biology, this argument makes even less sense, as explained in this text Natural Age of Consent

The position of trust/nuclear family argument

This argument claims that it's unnatural and harmful to be having sex with your own child you are living with. It is, in my view, a better argument than the first one, but in my case it is irrelevant, as I don't live with my daughter, who in any case lives in a different country altogether and I've in fact never even seen her irl.

The pregnancy/genetic harm argument

This argument says that children born out of incestuous relationships can have genetic defects. Again, a good enough argument on its own but it doesn't apply to my case, as I have no intention of getting my daughter pregnant.

One argument against my position I've sadly never heard but would like to add here would be

The patriarchal/get your daughter married to a good man argument

This argument holds that fathers shouldn't sexually use their daughters as they should marry them off to good quality men as virgins. While completely true, this argument, once again, doesn't apply to my situation (or the situation of most fathers in the femisphere). In the feminist Western world fathers can't marry off their daughters to husbands of their own or their family's choosing. In fact, it's basically impossible to even raise your daughter right even without marrying her off. Home-schooling is prohibited in many parts of Europe and in any case asks for extreme sacrifices, especially if you want to hold a job.

Also, most women in today's feminist areas don't even hold the right patriarchal views so this makes it even harder. In my case, the girl's mother is a schizophrenic slut (I mean with an actually diagnosed schizophrenia) who holds very few opinions on anything at all. So raising a daughter that way would require me to 1) go to Netherlands, where she's been living since she was born, or get her to live with me here - very impractical in either case, especially since I've never been there and can't speak Dutch 2) get full custody, which is also basically impossible due to language barrier, huge expenses, the fact that I've not been taking care of her and the fact that femifascist courts in Europe will always side with a woman in child custody cases unless she is extremely ill and unsuitable for taking care of a child. For example, take a look at this disturbing video from Croatia -
As you can see there, this cunt female social worker and a cucked cop are trying to take this young boy into mother's custody due to a court order, despite him screaming and hiding in his room, obviously not wanting to go. His father is already in jail for obstructing this so he can't do anything. As seen here, courts obviously don't care about the lifelong psychological damage they're inflicting on this child, who is screaming in obvious extreme anguish. Such are the family courts in most of Europe outside of places like Belarus or Russia, where courts aren't just tools of feminism but actually try to do the best for the child.

All in all, it seems all the arguments against it are completely senseless so far.

MuslimCell #sexist #fundie incels.co

[Blackpill] foids have been always blackpilled but can't admit it

Foids are blackpilled , but they do not want to accept it . If they do , they will see themselves nothing more then sex object for male that serves him and raise his children , she won't feel anymore special whatsoever and see the meaningless and absurdity of life and human relationships including love , family and friendships . Foids won't be able to handle this truth and would most likely rope so they simply continue their coping and delusional thinking and putting up a mask to hide from the truth .
They are nothing more then sexual object inferior to the male on every level and are here only to serve the male and raise his Children . After All man are better at doing everything or every job better then foids even raising children . Fathers are by far better caretaker what so ever . we are simply do not need them .
Even.god created Adam first then created from adam body the woman . they are nothing more then a small lesser part of the male body and soul , the male must have all control over her just like he had control over his own body . God created Adam on his image but never Eve . That's who you are woman deal with it and you have nothing to do about it .

It is He who created you from one soul and "created from it " its mate(woman) that he might dwell in security with her. (Qur’an 7:189)

22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24 (Ephesians 5:23 )

CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

PA’s comment evoking the inherent tension between fathers and daughters — pitting protective instinct against sexual awakening over a Darwinian backdrop of expensive eggs and post-industrial delayed marriage — had me thinking about the kinds of affronts with which a daughter could burden her father, and how they would rank on a “bringing dishonor to the family and heartbreak to daddy” checklist.

When you come down to it, no father likes his daughter of any age “dating” any man, of any age. Tolerance of dating is a compromise with modernity.

(and WTF is an “LTR”, that most mealy-mouthed word of the century?)

He would be delighted with his mid-teens daughter marrying a proper 30-year old man.

LTR is shorthand for long term relationship. (I’m mentioning this for the few Philistines here who may not be familiar with the acronym.) It came into existence out of necessity, to describe the modern sexual market phenomenon of being with one partner for a long time without codifying the commitment in marriage. It has also entered our lexicon because short-lived flings became more common, and a more precise term to describe a romantic relationship longer than three months was required.

I agree with PA here, in that I believe “dating” (as opposed to courtship that quickly led to either rejection or marriage proposal) is a fairly recent creation in human history. Years spent dating multiple lovers until settling down into marriage and kids when the woman is on the downslope of her fertility curve is certainly a historical anomaly; I doubt humans would have survived as a species had the modern dating market been the norm throughout our evolution.

Daughter Guarding in the Time of Game and the Cock Carousel would seem to be paramount for fathers today, but that hasn’t panned out; in fact, more than ever fathers are abdicating their role as guardians of daughters’ sexuality, probably out of fear of losing status within their suburban soccer mom virtue signaling milieus. In the upper classes, there’s almost a glorification of daughters “sowing their yeast”, while in the lower classes, mudsharking is tolerated if not outright celebrated. Sheeeiit, the ex-President’s own daughters have been caught smoking dope at a rap concert; no public consternation was proffered from the Gay Mulatto.

What this suggests is that paternal investment is fading as a social and familial binding agent in the West, aka Africanization. As a Gabber put it,

Where’s the daughter-guarding when it counts?

They’re paying big bucks to subsidize her “independence” “adventures” and “travels” while she’s surfing “lotsa cockas” when she goes away to college, to the big city or overseas…

Another Gabber astutely commented that the death of Daughter Guarding and the removal of restrictions on female sexuality (along with the neutering of fatherly oversight) opens Glandora’s Box to shifting and corrupted definitions of sexual imprudence that no one can agree upon.

recreationalization of sex means that most “sexual misconduct” is morally equivalent to a 5 yard penalty.

A revival of Daughter Guarding means that fathers have to get back in touch with their native Disgust Response and relearn the ancient lesson that Disgust is the source pool of Morality. Society will have to grow smaller, as well, because scaling up way past the Dunbar limit like in Calhoun’s rat experiments inevitably causes breakdowns in the natural dynamics between parent and child and between family and community.

Using my powers of imagination, I’ve come up with this short list of what actions a (White) daughter could take that would crush her (White) father’s spirit, in descending order of soulkill:

Burn the coal/marry the coal (soulkill)
Turn to prostitution
Get fat and dye her hair blue
Become lesbian
Remain single, childless, and infected with toxoplasma gondii
Murder
Hook up with an inmate or psycho
Date a homeless bum
Date a hispanic or asian
Date a (White) “artist” or aspiring rock star
Date her debauched professor
Date a well-heeled man 10+ years her senior
Marry a well-heeled man 10+ years her senior
Briefly court then marry an Epic Chad with a square jawline (soulthrill) and family money

A healthy White culture denigrates the top 2/3rds of that list and poeticizes the bottom third. The message our Current Year culture instead delivers is the polar opposite. Epic Chads are rape hoaxed by seething hateful cunts and mudsharking is put forth as desirable progress.

Daughter Guarding is mostly a NW European White man thing. Even today the norm for most of the world is marrying off ripe teen daughters. Whites regulate this natural impulse with laws and cultural taboos, and the reason they can do this is because as a race they have evolved high paternal investment and a disposition to favor nuclear family formation.

Concomitant with this NW European Inner Hajnal White outbred nuclear family disposition is later marriage, but that cultural anomaly (compared to the global norm) was sustained by restrictions on women’s sexuality; i.e., unmarried medieval women didn’t have an opportunity to ride the cock carousel. Male chivalry was part and parcel of that restrictive regimen.

Daughter Guarding matters are best left to family and community oversight and not to an impersonal legal machine staffed and operated by Rebekahs, feminist cunts, Diversity™, and bitter spinsters. Mobility and urban atomization have neutered that oversight so we have chucked nuance for One Strike You’re Out, but this unjustly penalizes, for example, high status older men who want to start families with younger women.

***

FYI Your Daily Shitlord Science: Female obesity, not young maternal age or pelvic immaturity, is associated with fetal malposition. Roy Moore did everything right (he has four kids) with a loving wife fourteen years his junior.

micropenis29 #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Teen Pregnancy Should Be Seen As Normal

In a healthy society, most foids ages 12-15 would be marrying and having babies. They would then continue having babies until they are 25 or so, and they would of course be full-time mothers and housekeepers.

Most men would be married with anywhere from 5 to 15 kids.

These would be the social norms, and anyone who broke them would be ostracized and rejected by mainstream society. The people most likely to fall into this category would be GigaChads, Chads, and the lowest-IQ foids since Chads prefer not to marry any foid, and the lowest-IQ foids are too dumb to realize that they need men to provide for them while they focus on child-rearing.

Note that this is the exact group that we want to stop being taken care of by society and to thus stop producing children, since this is the dumbest set of people.

DownWithWomen #sexist wehuntedthemammoth.com

When artificial wombs are invented men won’t even have to do it, women will rope themselves as their sexual market value plus power that comes alongside it is completely destroyed.

W]hen [women] start to diminish men will most likely find it viable to cross the x-y line in order to flock to cute-boys to settle down with, and marry whom don’t have the hypergamous instinct of biological females.

As soon as [artificial wombs] are invented we don’t have to put up with the bullshit of women anymore, cute-boys are more feminine than western females and always eager to please/available for sex to a partner.

They are more of a woman than any western whore and at the same time if you pursue them now there is no trouble, and also no ridiculous laws on what rape is(Which is everything nowadays) protecting them.

Even if one marries a nice-guy he will only get used for his money, while she will continue to sleep around with the alpha male bad boys. The beta male nice guy will be forced to pour his resources into raising his child, which should be the responsibility of the other man and not him.

Women are biologically hypergamous, will always date and marry up, and even if in a relationship, a woman will immediately leave the man for a higher guy if she thinks she can land him.

Women also sexually desire men who have a violent criminal record(Especially murder/assault/robbery/drugs/gangs being the top most “hot”) and wear tattoos/piercings on them. The jerks and badboys half of which being criminals, sometimes fresh out of prison/jail or bullies in school are straightforward about their sexual intentions; and masculine enough to press for it.

dsar9012 #sexist sluthate.com

MGTOWs are destroying the roasties and cuck on /pol/
I noticed on /pol/ recently (at 4chan not 8chan), there are more and more guys who are going MGTOW and are even blacpilled incels who are going their own way (like me). Great news, since /pol/ is very influence, far more so than pretty much any subreddit and far more than Sluthate or any other incel site.

With luck the number of blackpilled men who are incel or MGTOW and know the truth about women will accelerate, as social media has allowed women to show their true nature and completely destroyed blupilled ideology that women want nice, caring guys. And completely destroyed cuckservative ideology that guys should just get married and start a family with some thot who can accuse you of rape with no proof and get you sent to prison for years, or fuck outside the marriage, get knocked up and then ask the husband to pay child support for a kid that isn't even his for 18 years.

Soon these feminist and cuckservative pussy worshipping SIMPS will run out of bluepilled cucks to exploit. Soon being MGTOW or incel will be a point of PRIDE (it already is for me) rather than targets of derision and degradation as they are for so much of modern, liberal, feminist, western, multicultural society. LONG LIVE MGTOW!! And also blackpilled incels who are spreading the truth about bitches, you just need to swallow the final blackpill that getting married/dating women is not worth it in the long run, especially if you're an omega male who women don't like.

Bill P #sexist unz.com

Lucky you. I have attraction to adventurous, mercurial types. I have paid dearly for that, but it’s been quite a ride.

I wish I preferred level-headed nice girls, but they bore me, and I don’t treat them as well as I ought to.

But ultimately I think good fatherhood, i.e. benevolent patriarchy, is more important to children’s development than whether or not their mothers are supermoms, which most women are not.

By working to destroy patriarchy, feminists have done more harm to children than anyone else in our society (both meanings of that sentence are true). If people don’t believe me when I say that, I tell them to look up the sexual assault stats for daughters of single moms vs. daughters who live with their bio dads. The figures are very instructive. People who know them should be outraged by feminists and the judges who indulge them.

There are of course scores of other measures that prove my point, but the above may be the most salient to women who might otherwise agree with witches like the lesbian who wrote the WaPo screed (and who actually have a conscience).

various MRAs #sexist reddit.com

Chicago Tribune Article Today: "'Prison is not where women need to be': All-female task force wants to cut Illinois’ female prison population in half"

(JStheHammer)
“Prisons were made for men, and they are made to traumatize,” said Celia Colon"

(lostapwbm)

“Prisons were made for men, and they are made to traumatize,” said Celia Colon, who teared up after sharing with the group her history of abuse. “They were not made for healing.”

Traumatizing men is perfectly acceptable. Traumatizing women (who got to prison by traumatizing others) is not acceptable because...women are equal to men?

“Prison is not where women need to be,” said Benedict, a partner on the National Resource Center on Justice Involved Women, funded by the U.S. Department of Justice. “Even if prisons were highly functional places, they don’t belong there. It’s a train wreck, to be honest, a train wreck.”

If women commit felonies, then prison is exactly where they need to be. As a matter of fact, women commit felonies and gynocentric judges and prosecutors often REFUSE to send them to prison.

Margaret Byrne, an attorney who for 35 years has represented countless women who fought back against abusers, agreed. Many women call 911 to report the violent crime they’ve just committed on a partner, Byrne said, but they fail at proving the difficult self-defense theory in court.

Probably because you can't 'self-defense' a man while he's sleeping, or when his back is turned, or when he's not presenting an immediate and credible threat.

By the time she was 16 and living in South Chicago, Colon had drifted into gang life, drawn by its offer of support — and guns for protection.

“I saw a lot of hurt and bloodshed,” Colon, 42, told the other women gathered at the first meeting. “Things that are never gonna be erased. It does irreversible damage.”

You mean you validated cholos and gangbangers by giving them pussy.

Those who insist that they cannot be held responsible for their own actions, that they are merely leaves floating along the winds of economic circumstances, ore are victims of societal programming, should not enjoy the right to affect or influence public policy or the use of public money.

(HeForeverBleeds)
I've got a long list of articles where people try to argue for female criminals getting lenient sentences or no jail on the basis of being female. A long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long list. I guess this one can be added

I think part of why it's such a popular idea is because gynocentrism is prevalent in both of the main ideologies. Feminism says females are always the oppressed victim to the point where even female criminals are truly the victims and therefore prison is "victimizing" them again. Traditionalism stereotypes women as helpless, innocent, childlike, and basically too weak to be a threat; therefore she's not really responsible for any crime she commits

Both tend to perceive women as morally superior. Both tend to perceive the well-being of the female in any given situation (whether she's the victim or the perpetrator) as more important and more worthy or in need of being protected

(fractureegg)
Yep. And proof of your argument can be found from a statement made a hundred years ago by Chicago attorney Agnes McHugh. In 1906 she said, “A man-jury will not convict a woman murderer in this county, if the prosecutor is a man. I think this leniency may be traced to the chivalry latent in every man.”

Turns out that having a female prosecutor or judge or females on the jury doesn't make any difference.

I don't have any stats handy but it's possible that female accountability vis a vis the justice system has actually grown over the past few decades. In patriarchies the main female "sin" is adultery, which is often severely punished; but they get away with pretty much everything else. (In some primitive fundamentalist religious societies, "witchcraft" is also severely punished).

But I guess it was inevitable that after a brief flirtation with the idea of treating women as semi-adults, feminists wouldn't be able to resist exploiting gynocentrism to increase their privileges even more. But women are still supposed to be treated like equals somehow. Zero logic or sense of justice, as usual.

(VantagePoint2018)
Generally, people look at the motives and background of female criminals whereas they just assume male criminals are uniquely evil.

(Razorbladekandyfan)
This is why we need a mens movement.

micropenis29 #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Foids will do pretty much anything with normies

EXCEPT fuck them.

This is what you Sub-8-Law-denying imbeciles will never understand.

You see foids talking, flirting, being playful, proposing social getogethers, and even going out of their way to do favors for normies. And you assume this leads to sex.

It DOESN'T. IT'S ALL A SCAM.

They're just trying to rope normies in to betabuxing. There is ZERO intent to have passionate sex with the normie.

In fact, they find the normie sexually repulsive, and want to have as little sex as possible with him while still getting all if his time, money, and attention.

And then they're on to the next sucker.

Sub-8 is law.

6ix9ineZooLane #fundie reddit.com

The only reason people deny what we say is because it comes from us

Whether people admit it or not most people do not respect the views of low-status men; since we are the lowest of the low most people see us and our opinions as trash and will go out of their way to deny anything we have to say. I've been blackpilling my Chadlite friend for about 2 months now and he has come to accept some of the core beliefs such as the importance of looks in all facets of life. I was blown away by the fact that when he starts dropping blackpills in front of normies and foids they actually agree with him. My main friendship circle is now fully accepting that women have easier dating lives. We can also see this when black people drop blackpills in real life and on social media. People don't go out of their way to disagree with them and quite often people agree with them. If we want people to swallow the blackpill, we need to get our Chad friends or at least our normie friends to swallow the blackpill.

Dongzhi Chen, et. al. #fundie whatsonweibo.com

The Resurgence of the Tiger Dad: Fathers Pushing Their Daughters – for Whose Good?
by Yue Xin

The phenomenon of the ‘tiger mother’, a strict mom who pushes her children to be successful, became popular through the 2011 book Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother by Amy Chua. Recent trends seem to signal a reevaluation of the stern, disciplinary father. On social media, many wonder why these fathers are pushing their daughters, and for whose good they actually do it.

The hashtag “Chinese piano girl stuns American audiences” has occupied the top searching lists on Sina Weibo, with many users praising Anke’s talents and hard efforts.

“Having just learned to play the piano for two years and four months, Anke now is able to play the pieces of grade 10 [the highest level before the ARCT],” Chen’s father Dongzhi Chen proudly told a reporter. He determinedly expressed his goals to train Anke to be a piano master and “the second Lang Lang” to China.

This is also what Anke told NBC’s host Steve Harvey when he asked the 5-year-old about her future dreams. But later, when he asked her the question “How did you start to play?”, she replied: “Dad wanted me to.”

Since her American television adventure, Anke has returned to her tightly scheduled life that revolves around the piano. She practices 4 hours a day, takes master’s classes at the Central Conservatory of Music, goes to concerts, and has dinner with fellow piano players. In the evenings when she has dinner with her dad, he makes her watch piano concerts on the computer.

In the Pear video, Anke initially almost seems to be a carefree girl- running around her dad like a butterfly. But the video report also shows how her father continuously sternly warns and commends his daughter to “listen to your father”, stop “fiddling around,” “stop wasting time and play the piano,” or to “show a happy face.”

The video also includes a short scene where Anke goes downstairs hoping to play with some friends, only to find herself alone: “My friends have probably all forgotten about me,” she says as she silently watches other children play on the basketball field.

image
Subtitle: “Don’t give me a bitter face.” (Screenshot of Pearvideo.)

“It’s very possible that she will hate me in the future. But I think it is the only way to realize her life values,” Dongzhi Chen says in the video: “I know this is the hardest route for her and I’ve expected the worst. But I believe if she can play the piano well, she will be smart and successful in doing other things too.”

[...]

Being a student of conservatory of music was a dream of Chen himself, but it did not happen because Chen’s family did not have the money for it. He explains: “Therefore, I want my daughter to continue to explore the ultimate beauty of music for me.”

Chen’s story resonates with that of China’s highest-grossing Indian film Dangal (?????). In this true story, a former wrestler has the unfulfilled dream to win a gold medal for India. He swears to train his future son to achieve this dream for him. But when he only has daughters, he decides to train them instead to become India’s first female champion wrestlers.

image
Chinese film poster of Dangal.

The film has received much praise from Chinese audiences. The movie received the high score of 9.2 out of 10 on Douban.com, a popular Chinese reviewing website for films or books.

The great popularity of Dangal in China is not coincidental. China and India share some common cultural characteristics. Both countries attach importance to filial piety, emphasize patriotism in sports, and promote “painful education” (????). The latter is especially visible in Dangal, where the father makes his daughters get up at 5 AM every day for training and makes them cut off their long hair.

State-owned news media Xinhua recently published an article about family values that can be learned from this film. The article says: “These Indian girls had no choice of life at all. It was their father who forced them and offered them new possibilities. In the perspective of gaining skills and obtaining knowledge, education is painful and is against one’s own instinct […] Parents need to lead their children and show them the way, as they don’t have the ability to judge for themselves.”

On Sohu, a recent article that received nearly 20 million views called on Chinese parents to “form a community” with their children. It said: “The medal is a joint achievement shared by father and daughter. Studying is a process of co-operation.”

[...]

In the Pear Video interview, the reporter asks Anke’s father if he will provide his daughter with more choices in the future. He answers: “She can have many choices, but this road [that I chose for her] will be doomed to fail if that happens.”

image
Anke’s ‘tiger dad’: “I hope she will pursue music all her life.”

Chinese parents have a long-standing reputation for being strict, and for making huge sacrifices for their children’s education. Anke’s father is no exception; he is so determined to train a child music prodigy that he seems to be ready to deal with any hardships that might come. But why are these ‘tiger dads’ so desperate to push their daughters to become superstars?

Socio-economic reasons play a major role. According to a study by McKinsey & Company, 76% of China’s urban population will be considered middle class by 2022. With this explosive growth of the emerging middle class, many Chinese parents see education as a crucial factor to improve the social mobility of their children.

For girls, this is especially important. The traditional patriarchal culture in China has negatively affected the social status of women throughout history. In contemporary society, their roles as wives and mothers are still often prioritized once they have babies. But as an indirect consequence of China’s one child policy, daughters have come to play a more important role in the family, generally receiving more parental attention and a better education than in the decades preceding the policy.

The role of the father in being the one who makes the most important decisions on children’s education comes from a long-standing tradition. An old Chinese saying “strict father, kind mother” (????) describes parenting in traditional Chinese society, where fathers are the stern disciplinarians who have more to say about their children’s education and than the mother. The mother’s role, traditionally, was defined by the persisting idea of “men rule outside, women rule inside” (“???,???”); meaning that women should be confined to the ‘inside’ sphere of family and home, occupying themselves with the household, while men deal with the ‘outside’ world of work, finances, community, etc.

The Chinese cultural concept of ‘mianzi‘ or ‘face’ also plays an important role. Representing a person’s reputation and prestige, parents gain ‘face’ when their children succeed. An ‘unsuccessful’ child would be a father’s shame.

As Anke’s father tells Pear Video: “If she would end up with a nine-to-five job, such as working in a musical instruments store, I would consider it a failure.”

[...]

One comment, receiving the most likes, said: “If this little girl is truly happy to play the piano, and she sure seems to be very gifted and willing to do so, I don’t think there’s any reason to criticize her father.”

Others also praised Dongzhi Chen, writing: “This dad is really awesome. Anyone who has kids will know that you can never force a child to do something. The media always wants to point out [these stories about] fathers who will force their own dreams upon their children, but the fact is that if the kid doesn’t want to do it, it won’t happen – no matter how she is pushed by her dad. The reason why this girl is so good now is because of her father’s guidance and education.”

But there are also those who oppose to the father’s parenting style: “I really hate this kind of parent. It’s fine to lead or guide your kid if she excels in some areas, but I feel disgusted that he just sits there and acts like he’s the kid’s almighty God.”

Some disapprovingly say: “He already has himself, why does he need a second person like him?”

There are also commenters who say that watching Dangal has changed their outlook: “After I watched this film, my attitude towards these kind of parents has changed completely.”

Others agreed, saying: “This movie truly is an inspiration – it is an encouragement for the tiger dad (??).”

Sparrow’s Song #homophobia #conspiracy #racist incels.co

(On “Spongebob Squarepants is a perfect example of bluepilled incels”)

The show is actually Jewish propaganda designed to convince incels to go gay. Obviously, Patrick and Spongebob are both ugly and disabled mentally and physically... they will die alone if they pursue foids. If they were blackpilled, they would just go ER or rope. Too bad the show is cucked. The show depicts them as "best friends" because back then, they couldn't just have gay poop dick sex relationships on children's shows like they do now. The writers want ugly and autistic male children to engage in homosexual buttfuckery at a young age.

That's why I watched Rocko's Modern Life instead when I was a kid. My dad liked that show but hated Spongebob. He didn't let me watch Spongebob. In his own words "you're not watching Spongebob because Sponegbob is a faggot".

Administrative_Worth & jeremyjimmy #sexist reddit.com

Re: Manlet ingested soy and took blue pill advice and went clubbing. You flew too close to the sun, brocel. (JFL They call him a creep for even existing in their vicinity)

image

(Administrative_Worth)

fashionmaxxed

hairmaxxed

groomaxxed

chad face

all rendered useless by his manletism

height > everything

I wouldn't say height over everything, but there's a minimum height requirement to even be in the game. It's a looks multiplier, everything under 5'10 gets a multiplier less than 1, eg 0.9 for 5'9.5 and gets a number higher than 1 multiplier when over 5'10, eg 5'11 =1.2x 6'2 = 1.5 6"4= 1.8x If you're below 5'5, you're multiplier score is 0, which means for all your looks, anything times 0 is zero. You're a non entity in the sexual world. It's brutal but true. You might be able to beta buxx with a very short woman

Yeah. If anything height is inverse for women. All the tall foids are always whining about being overlooked for short girls. Theyre basically tallcels

Tall foids just refuse to date short men. They're like the white women who complain about noodlewhores taking all the white men, not once considering to date a ricecel.

It's because their dating pool is guys of the same height, maybe a tiny bit shorter, and prefer taller guys. Their pool is already diminished and heavily competed over. I've dated a really short girl. years ago before I became a dsiabledcel. You could just pick her up at will, it's alot harder to do that with a tall girl.

tall girls aren't out of the market. They're just competing fo an already diminished group of society that is highy sought after. a 6'0 foid doesn't usually want a 5'11 or 5'10 guy, she usually wants 6'0 + in a much stronger way than normal foids want 6'0+. Her heightmatch is her settle. SO she has 10% of the populaton which are even acceptable beta buxxers.

Unironically this might be why. I have a very shitty frame and even I have won every fight I had with foids. They just can't throw a punch, all they do is push and kick and scream it's actually hilarious.

How many foids are you fighting man?

(jeremyjimmy)
I'll get shit for this but I'm not an incel, I'm just suffering from being majorly blackpilled. I've been talking to girls in private about the blackpill. They confirm IT ALL. They say shit like "yeah, height is the number one thing. I want a guy to be big." A girl I know who is 4ft 11 said that. She dated a 6ft 1 guy.

Literally every single girl I've brought this up with has confirmed the height thing, that it's super important. I'll admit, this shit is important to me too, I love short girls. If they're too tall I find them less attractive. This is where society has royally fucked up, they tell the truth about male sexuality and lie, for dumb, instinctual, animal like reasons, about female sexuality and preferences. So it's resulted in all this shitty behavior from women where they talk one way and act the EXACT opposite and then punish you or try to for noticing.

That's resulted in all these movements online, the blackpill, MGTOW, redpill. Then they start screeching about those, calling them misogyny. If it's misogyny then why does every girl I've met repeat all this stuff when they're alone? They all love black/redpill videos on Youtube because girls all hate each other. I don't even dislike women, I hate the people who lie to men about this stuff. More women do need to be honest about this stuff in public though.

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist incels.co

[ToxicFemininity] How any girl can become a Millionaire by age 25

DIVORCE RAPE

* Marry a rich bluepiller in your late teens then divorce him after 2years
* 18 - 20 first marriage, divorce rape him and get half of his financial assets
* 20 - 22 play the victim and say you were the perfect wife and lie and slander your cucked ex-Husband and say he was pure evil. A cucked betabuxxer will marry you and you can divorce rape him after 2 years and take half of his assets
* 22 - 24 move to another state or even another country. Since foids are biologically wired to be big liars , you can lie and say you are a virgin ("i broke my hymen by riding bicycles and playing sports Teehee"). Also lie and say you have never been married. Then marry a bluepilled normie who thinks all foids are infallible angels then divorce rape him after 2years

ONLYFANS

* If you run an onlyfans for 7 years straight (18 - 24) you will make thousands upon thousands

TINDER

* Foids can get free meals and free gifts from thirsty guys on tinder. As such, there is no reason why a foid would spend any money on food or clothes. Over a period of 7 years(18 - 25 years) this translates to thousands upon thousands of dollars saved.

eTHOTDOM

* Being a boobie streamer on Twitch, foids can make obscene amounts of cash. Foids can make thousands upon thousands by selling their bath water, their used panties, their used tampons, their footpics e.t.c.

GRAND TOTAL

* So, over a period of 7years (18 - 25 years) if you add up all the money that a foid can accrue from the above mentioned low IQ acts, that total amount of money can easily exceed ONE MILLION DOLLARS.

WHY THIS IS RELEVANT TO THE INCEL CINEMATIC UNIVERSE DISCUSSION

[scales]

* Nature strives to exist in a state of equilibrium - kinda like balanced scales.
* As such, assuming that one side of the scale represents the amount of power foids have sexually, then the other side represents the amount of power males have in the sexual marketplace.
* Seeing the insanely large amounts of benefits and power that foids have in the SMP for just existing - it shows that the scales are tipped in the foids favour in ALL facets of human endeavour.
* Meaning that males, especially sub5 incels are suffering and have little to no benefit in the SMP, and also in life in general.
* The more power foids gain in society the less power subhumans (80% of all males globally) will have.
* ITS OVER AND IT WILL NEVER BEGIN

OverBeforeItBegan #sexist incels.co

Believing we're in any way better off than him is a massive cope in the true sense of the word.

The cope is him believing he's better than anyone. Most men can find someone who has had dozens of cocks inside them and is approaching their 30s, if they're financially stable. You'd have to be a legit incel saint to not be able to. Women's standards for settling down aren't high since they've already got their taste of all different types of cock and they can no longer get more than ONS out of good looking men.
Thinking he's 'cool' enough to basically put "I get le sexy times now" on his Reddit bio is cringe as fuck.

I can't. Can you? Whether you'd want to or not is another matter, but if you don't even have a choice then it's a massive cope to believe being incel is in any way comparable never mind better. Pretty much every rich celebrity Chad will choose (despite not having to) someone who's had dozens of cocks inside them and approaching or is even over 30. If you're holding out for a teenage virgin and think everyone who doesn't is worse off than us, that's straight up deluded.

You can. Or you're a deformed-tier truecel. I'm not at the age to be thinking about marriage yet.

Comparing what celebrities do to what average Joes do is low IQ. Celebrities have status to care about. They usually marry other high-status people. Do you think it would go unnoticed if famous middle-aged men started dating teenagers? Look at the shit Leo gets for fucking women in their early 20s.

Well I don't think I'm deformed-tier truecel but foids who were in their late 20s early 30s never gave me the time of day, not at 35, not at 30, not at 25.

If you call yourself an incel even though you could attract 29 year old foids, you really shouldn't be rotting here with us.

[Experiment] "Women hit the wall at 40 bro" is the biggest cope ever, MGTOWcels GTFIH

Jfl if you believe someone who can't get a 20yo foid can easily get a 30yo foid.

Why? We're talking about foids in the prime of their lives who still want to explore dozens of cocks and shit on their fathers as much as they can before they get old vs expired old hags who are getting their baby rabies. Their priorities changed and now they want a financially stable man with whom they can have kids before they're too old.

DiCaprio gets good natured ribbing and also gets work. There's plenty of high status people doing everything that you think would supposedly be judged for, but eventually all settle down by some foid in her 30s or older.

Yeah, because he fucks women in their 20s. Do you think roasties and soys would let him fuck teenagers, let alone marry them? lolno, his career would take a big hit.
What exactly are they doing? I doubt anything is as bad as fucking teenagers in the eyes of roasties.
You can't compare celebrities to ordinary people. Their priorities in life are entirely different.

Jim #sexist blog.jim.com

[From "The reactionary program"]

Neoreaction plans to be the priesthood, but we think warriors should be on top and should steal sufficient to fund the army and the state, that warriors should do warrior stuff, merchants should do merchant stuff, and priests priestly stuff.

Our current problems are the result of an excessively numerous priesthood overflowing and intruding on the activities more properly performed by merchants and warriors. Thus human resources disrupts the corporation, wars are overrun by lawyers, and the military is forced to pretend that women can be warriors. This excess of priests is a result of priestly dominance with open entry into the priesthood and the resulting overflow of people into the priesthood.

We plan to cut off open entry into the priesthood. The Marxist and progressive program is a rationale for the priesthood intruding into the affairs of merchants and warriors. It is full employment program for Academia. Hence the joke that LIA, Low Intensity War, actually stands Lawyer Infested War. Hence the cat ladies of Human Resources, and the transformation of accounting from tracking value and value creation, to talmudic generation and enforcement of obscure, obstructive, and incomprehensible rules. Today, accounting is not about tracking value when it is transferred from one entity to another, and measuring the creation of value, but rather what rituals one must perform if one wants to transfer value from one entity to another.

Lawyers (who tend to be the day to day ruling class even if academia sets doctrine long term) and writers like all the priestly professions overwhelmingly oppose Trump.

In a reactionary state, the state will enforce marriage, and end open entry into the priesthood. Military priests will be trained in military academies under the control of retired warriors. Women will be forced to honor and obey the first man they have sex with till death do them part and will be denied access to men who are not yet contributing to the state and society.

Women feel that a man who is single and lonely, especially in today’s world of open sexual market, is not fully a male of the human species. At best, he may be an animal with some horrid infectious disease of the skin to be pitied from a distance. But much more often they are just ignored or laughed at. No amount of ideology can override these hard wired settings in the female brain.

On the other hand, men see this in women and join the mocking and the laughter in order to signal that they’re definitely not that type.

Since women are hypergamous, the natural tendency is for there to be a very large number of young males in this hyperoppressed class.

Further, this incel class cuts across the reactionary classes (warrior, priest, merchant, and followers), since high status wealthy businessmen, merchant class, often do very badly with women, and people that we categorize as priestly class, high status males whose career requires strict political correctness, who are required to very politically correct, usually do very badly with women.

But if we look at successful past societies, they have generally taken extraordinarily drastic coercive measures to minimize this class of men, to overule female hypergamy.

While socialism in goods invariably fails catastrophically, in part because the priests run businesses to produce holiness, rather than value, drastic coercive intervention in the market for love and sex seems to be a basic requirement of civilization, without which civilizations fail. We need to ensure that every man who pays taxes and every man who fights for order tribe, society, King and God, gets pussy, which runs contrary to natural female inclination.

Marriage is a contract between the former owner of the bride, normally her father, and the new owner of the bride, normally her husband. Reproductive sex is an essential part of this contract.
Women should be attached to one male and not allowed to ride the cock carousel, ideally the first male they ever have sex with, hence shotgun marriage.

Male society consists of priests, warriors, merchants, and followers, and the female population is not a society, but consists of feral women and women under the authority of a husband or father. Women are only part of society through an intimate relationship with a male in authority over her. That is not the reactionary program. That is biological reality, manifesting in the disastrous consequences of attempting have female run corporations. Today, we don’t have equal women, we have feral women.

Late marriage west of the Hajnal line was, in the towns, linked to enforceable apprenticeship, up to about 1800 or so. A man was typically an apprentice till about twenty four or so, and it was ok to be lonely, despised, and mistreated, since upon successfully completing his apprenticeship, he would cease to be despised and mistreated, and would soon afterwards marry a virgin about four or so years younger than himself – who had been apprenticed to housewifery, to servant and housekeeping type tasks, or some traditionally feminine occupation, but who upon marriage would perform those tasks for her husband, or under the supervision of her husband. For women, apprenticeship was typically ended by marriage, for men, marriage typically followed not long after the completion of apprenticeship, at least in the towns, where work was formalized. In rural areas, work relationships and education were informal, so no connection between formal work, education, and getting married appears in the records for rural areas.

Apprenticeship was emasculating, but apprentices were expected learn from a manly role model who was working at producing value, and expected to become that man. Today, they are trained by priests who have no knowledge of the real world, and will not read old books, instead reading what other twenty first century academics say about old books that they have not read either.

The apprentice role was effeminate and emasculating, with the vows of apprenticeship and the restraints of apprenticeship resembling a wife’s marital vows, but it was intended to prepare them for life as a man, not to prevent them from becoming men, whereas modern priestly education aims at preventing men from becoming men.

In North America apprenticeship typically ended about three years earlier at twenty one, and people correspondingly got married earlier.

Frame is a set of assumptions about the conversation and the interaction, and in order to facilitate communication and the interaction, we tend to tacitly accept the assumptions without conscious awareness.

Notice we have the word “racist”, but no word for people who claim that there are no races, that everyone is alike. We have the word “sexist”. If you think that women are different from men, you are sexist, but no word for someone who thinks they are interchangeable should be subject to the same rules, and perform the same social roles.

History shows that whoever tells you capitalism is a recent economic system intends to murder you. Notice that no one making this claim is prepared to argue it or defend it – they just frame it a way that presupposes it is indisputable fact that one doubts, that you agree that it is true. They will never argue on the basis of history, only try to project their frame on to you. Commies murdered a hundred million people, and commies told all of those people commies were on their side against evil capital.

The reactionary program is being met with efforts to frame it as if we agreed, as if everyone agreed, with progressive frame. Supposedly we want different rules for women because we hate women. Supposedly we want capitalism and security of property because we favor rule by the capitalist class. Supposedly we want families to be protected by society, Church, Sovereign, and God, because we hate women and want to beat our wives and children. Supposedly property rights are rule by capital, and did not exist for anyone except aristocrats until quite recently. Supposedly whites fled Detroit because they hate blacks, not because their houses were being burned down around their ears.

I intend a restoration modeled on Charles the Second: Fertile semi hereditary aristocratic elite, divine right monarch, openly official state religion, which one must affirm for state or quasi statal office, capitalism and modern corporate capitalism, with a restriction that the business plan be approved and adhered to. Investors need to know what they are investing in, and governments need to know that large successful corporations will not start investing in unrelated activities that buy them political influence and restrain competition. One corporation should have one business model.

The situation immediately preceding Charles the Second resembled today’s American Hegemony: An officially unofficial state religion that had suffered a leftist singularity, which singularity was ended by Cromwell, not Charles the Second. He ended it with far less bloodshed than Stalin ended it in Russia, though bloodshed is frequently unavoidable, and more difficult to avoid the further leftism has gone.

The American hegemony also resembles the Turkish empire, which had become the anti Turkish empire as the US State Department has become “The International Community”. It was the Turks, not the provinces, that revolted against the Turkish empire. I had hoped that Trump would be Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, would be Atatürk, Cromwell, and Charles the Second in one man, but that is a tall order. An Atatürk needs to be a military man, and the left has taken precautions against such a man.

As progressivism spirals to ever greater heights of madness, ever faster, there is bound to be a crack up – bound to be a Kemal Atatürk, a Cromwell if we are lucky or a Stalin if not quite as lucky, and, eventually, if we are brave, effective, prudent, and lucky, a Charles the Second.

Female emancipation never lasts, because peoples, tribes, cultures, states, and religions with emancipated females fail to reproduce. Pretty soon Japan will not have the Japanese. They either restore patriarchy, as the Japanese have done once before, or they will be conquered by manly patriarchs who enslave their women, as happened to the Chinese, or they just disappear and are replaced by outsiders. Peoples with emancipated women cannot fight very well, because they are short of young males, because involuntarily celibate young males prefer to hang out in mum’s basement, and because young males are reluctant to fight for family, society, sovereign and God, because they don’t have family. They are even more reluctant when society, official state religion, and the sovereign is hostile to them having sexual opportunity, and ejects husbands from their families. Why fight when you have no pussy to fight for, and when if you got married, would likely face a court order parting you from your children and denying you your assets. Our descendants will patriarchs, or we will be mighty short of grandchildren and we will be replaced by patriarchs.

tehgymcel420 #sexist incels.co

In my culture you are shamed for marrying a non virgin

Where I'm from, when you marry a foid and fuck her for the first time, she is supposed to bleed. You then take your bloody bed sheets and hang them outside your door, to show everyone that you took the foid's virginity. Those who do not marry a virgin a shamed, marrying a non virgin is no different from marrying a whore.

"Nuke 'em from orbit" Award

It's the only way to be sure.

Various Incels #sexist #racist #psycho incels.co

RE: [SuicideFuel] Dude beats 13 yo incel into submission and makes him twerk for talking to his 9 yo daughter

(NoCopeNoHope)

How do we know he was incel? An incel couldn't even get a foid to talk to him. The dad was based tbh. If every father did this to both the boys and their daughters, foids would stay virgins till marriage.

Wat?

An incel can't talk with a foid. They ignore us. The kid was probs a young chadlite who wanted to fuck the chick. It should be illegal to even talk to a foid without consulting with her father, like the old days. We need Sharia but more strict.

(BummerDrummer)

going against the grind. Boy deserved it. Burn the coal pay the toll, the boy in the scenario fucked a nigger and u get what u get

The kid looked mutt. His hair is dark and curly.

oh well then. Still deleting whatever goods left in him.

(Reprobus)

I’d do the same thing if not worse if I was a father. Don’t see why everyone is hating on the based black guy

(toyotacel)

why the fuck does he care ?, his 9 year old is gonna become a total slut anyway, she'll be giving birth to multiple kids by different dads in no time.

(PluralSpaceRace)

How the ghetto rats mind works:
"I am mad at 13 year old boy"
"In response I will make him twerk naked"
He is using sex to dominate, same shit that happens in prisons. On a 13 year old boy.
Faggot shit tbh

(To_Live_is to_Serve)

OP does not mention the race of those involved. Its a primitive human attacking and humiliating a weak adolescent target of a rival people without the inhibition of a civilized man. Best wishes to incels of all races.

(Adamhastor)

Clearly not an incel.
He was naked in a 9yo girl's room. Must have been an aspiring Chad. Black foids hit puberty around 8-9 yo so it would make sense.

Andrew Lansdown #fundie lifeministries.org.au

I. The origin of marriage

The opening chapters of Genesis reveal that marriage originates from God. He is its author on two counts—by creation and by command.

In the beginning, “God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Genesis 1:27). Marriage is possible because God made human beings male and female. Had he made us asexual like the angels there would be no marriage. But as it is, he made humanity as a duality—masculine and feminine. Consequently, men and women possess contrasting but complementary bodies and natures, thereby making it possible for one to fulfil the other in marriage.

Furthermore, God made human beings in his own image. Among other things, this means that we possess personality, conscience, intellect, and will. All these spiritual qualities are necessary for the relationship we call marriage. A ram and a ewe, a dog and a bitch, cannot marry because they lack the spiritual dimension that marriage requires. A man and a woman, on the other hand, may marry precisely because their natures are more than biology and instinct. As spiritual beings, we are capable of love and commitment. In short, because he created us in his image, God created us with the ability to enter into a relationship with each other.

God further established the foundations of marriage by the special creation of woman from man. After the Lord had made Eve from Adam’s rib, he brought her to Adam, who said, “This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man” (Genesis 2:21-23). Men and women are related by image and by blood. Therefore we yearn for one another.

Having made marriage possible by his creative power, God then made it necessary by his moral decree. He proclaimed that because woman was taken out of man to be his companion, “a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). God mandated marriage at the commencement of human existence. Marriage is morally imperative for any couple who wish to proceed in their relationship beyond a certain level of intimacy.

II. The nature of marriage

The essential characteristics of marriage can be discerned from a statement by the Lord Jesus Christ recorded in Matthew 19:4-6, where he cites and comments on Genesis 2:24. Answering a question put to him by the Pharisees about divorce, Jesus said, “Have you not read that he who made them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder.” Six truths concerning the nature of marriage emerge from this statement.

Firstly, marriage is heterosexual. It is for male and female—not male and male or female and female. While this is a truism, such is the moral tenor of our age that some people are confused about it. But there is no confusion in Scripture. It condemns homosexual behaviour as biologically aberrant and morally abhorrent. The advocacy of homosexual marriage is nothing less than an attempt to clothe an unspeakable perversion in the robes of decency. Have you not read that he who made them from the beginning made them male and female? Marriage involves the union of members of the opposite sex.

Secondly, marriage is sexual. The first thing a man and a woman do when they are alone after their wedding is “become one flesh”. Marriage involves intimate physical and spiritual union between a man and a woman.

Thirdly, marriage is monogamous. It permits one man to unite with one woman for life. Christ clarifies this by the way he cites Genesis 2:24. While the use of the singular for “man” and “wife” in Genesis 2 ought to be enough to indicate the monogamous nature of marriage, Christ leaves no room for doubt or dispute by inserting the word “two”: the man and his wife, “the two shall become one flesh.” Marriage involves an intimate union of two people to the exclusion of all others.

Fourthly, marriage is solitary. A husband and wife must stand together, and this means that to a certain extent they must stand apart. The Lord declares that the first step in the marriage process is to leave mother and father. This is necessary so that the marriage partners may truly cling to each other. There must be no staying home with, or running home to, the parents. Old relationships must be broken so that the new may be embraced. Marriage involves two people setting out in life together, relying primarily upon each other for their desires and needs.

Fifthly, marriage is permanent. It is a union for life. Once a man and a woman become one flesh, they can never entirely separate themselves again. Their physical union establishes a spiritual union that affects their whole lives. They are spliced together, and cannot be separated without ongoing emotional and metal violence. In addition to this, the Lord Jesus reveals that it is God himself who actually unites a man and a woman in marriage; and he does so with a view to a life-long relationship. What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder! Marriage involves a commitment from each partner to the other as long as they both live.

Sixthly, marriage is sacred. It is no mere human invention: it is a divine institution. When they marry, a man and a woman enter into a relationship hallowed by God. He is a party to their marriage. He is a witness to their vows and their intimacies, and he binds them to both. He joins them together. Marriage involves the divine as well as the human, the spiritual as well as the physical, the eternal as well as the temporal.

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(Comments on "Help me with my list of female interests that I'm trying to record down", part 1. OP here, Part 2 here)

(jerrycan dan)
A big one is scrolling through online clothes shopping pages and just looking at all the clothes, sometimes obviously mindlessly, scrolling through to see as many as possible. The ones I sit behind at university are captivated by it, I've known a few men who will do this with adidas shoes because they "think it's cool" but never to the extent women do it. I don't fully understand why they do it either, how much of it is the clothes and how much of it is them in the clothes? Is me defaulting to thinking of them as vapid just failing to see the appeal?

(suckdick)
netflix, reality shows, mexican/spanish/turkish soap operas

(Ignas)
chasing chad

(PEEETER)
''cute guys''

(Sans)
Texting/just scrolling through text messages

Leaving guys on read

Chatting with several dozen Chads at any given time on tinder

(HardToSwallow)
You forgot anything that Chad likes.

(Sans)
Invading male spaces too. I’m surprised they don’t go looking for attention in men’s bathrooms.

(Nakuro)
@Eugenicist

[the OP]

harry potter? how old are you mate? i think you shoudlnt be here

(Eugenicist)
@HardToSwallow

You forgot anything that Chad likes.

I mean on their own, isolated, without chad pressuring them to like it.
I had a foid who rpetended to like cars with one chad, then said fuck cars to the other chad she was with who liked pokemon, and hipster bands lol.
So women are constantly wishy washy.

@Nakuro

harry potter? how old are you mate? i think you shoudlnt be here

I said women like harry potter. I made a forum on how women are superficial basedo n their entertianment and some agreed.
Women like vampires, fantasy, twilight, but they're not hte basic bitches you'd think. more like the literature heavy bitches who are still no less superficial.

(HardToSwallow)
@Eugenicist

I mean on their own, isolated, without chad pressuring them to like it.
I had a foid who rpetended to like cars with one chad, then said fuck cars to the other chad she was with who liked pokemon, and hipster bands lol.
So women are constantly wishy washy.

I said women like harry potter. I made a forum on how women are superficial basedo n their entertianment and some agreed.
Women like vampires, fantasy, twilight, but they're not hte basic bitches you'd think. more like the literature heavy bitches who are still no less superficial.


In that case your list is pretty spot on. Foids are like spineless noodles, they'll conform to whatever offers the least resistance

(IncelGenocide)
low gonial angles

projected maxillas

long femurs

norwood 1s

(Eugenicist)
@HardToSwallow

In that case your list is pretty spot on. Foids are like spineless noodles, they'll conform to whatever offers the least resistance.

They take high pride in their insulation. They think anyone who is a hard worker is worthless from the angles they're evaluating from. Where someone who has to work shows low pedigree. Women want genopedigree and filiopedigree and existentiopedigree.
Affiliation, genetics, and existence.
Asians and light skin fascination is proof enough of this.

(exe)
Partying ((having fun))

(Eskimocel)
Chad chasing
Pool parties

(fOreVER)
Psychology fashion sex with chad

TakeemtoToontown #sexist reddit.com

For foids, "voluntarily alone" means "only one consistent sexual partner"

image

Why even bother going on? They're all like this. Ascending with a modern woman is essentially bestiality. They are not human. Humans have at least a shred of self-awareness. Foids are incapable of understanding. All I can say is EDNW.

More and more, I'm starting to feel that the culmination of digesting the blackpill is to go MGTOW, which is redpill ironically. These days, the whole "get looks to get a gf" idea seems naive cuz women are NPCs and society is fucked up.

EDNW?

El1iot did nothing wrong. I'm always afraid I'm going to be thrown into a cell if I praise him too much. I know that's extremely paranoid but to be honest I would welcome prison at this point. A place where I can be cut off from the outside world and all my necessities are provided for me without wageslaving doesn't sound too bad.

SchrodingersDick #sexist incels.co

The collapse of civilization is happening in your lifetime. Feminism caused it. There is no coming back from this. Long post.

Expanded upon another post of mine in another thread.. been meaning to post this for you all. I kinda suck at writing so it might be all over the place. There’s a TL;DR down below but I put a lot of effort into this so I’d appreciate if you took the time to read.

For the cucktears lurkers, before you shit on this, Take a step back and look at the world in the context of just another sexually dimorphic mammal species to understand the following.

Civilization is inherently a patriarchy. They are the same thing. One cannot exist without the other. In order for a civlization to exist, female sexual nature (hypergamous genetics-based mate selection) must be kept in check, for men to be treated equally and fairly, to allow for all members to have hope that if they contribute, they can be rewarded with guanrateed breeding right over a female of their choosing. In this sense, it is necessary for the success of a civilization that women be sexually oppressed.. this developed world is a man’s thing and will only ever cater to men. It is our creation for the benefit of all, but mostly genetically subpar, men. It’s all built at the expense of women’s vaginas. Any society in which women have free mate selection can not function. In tribal times, there was 1 sexually successful man for every 17 sexually successful women.. assuming a 100% female sexual success rate, that leaves 94% of men sexless. This is important. If it weren’t for this fact, we wouldn’t have a problem and this site wouldn’t exist. We need to replace genetic currency with something else in order to appease all men and make it possible for everyone to contribute and build something great.. Money was invented. Money must represent survival in order to be worth anything. It must replace the baseline definition of survival meaning a big strong male able to kill other males in a fight. Well we have a police force for that now so no need to worry. But most importantly, it must be able to be used as leverage to purchase pussy under the guise of survival. That’s the only way to keep the male population happy. Without it, women have to reason to mate with subpar men.. This system is inherently oppressive to women. Unfortunately for them, this system favors survival over reproductive success. Everyone survives and procreates but at the expense of females carrying and birthing inferior DNA. Survival is not enough for them. The idea of 1:1 male to female mate pairings guarantees that all the females not paired with a high SMV male with be with a low SMV male and produce genetically poor kids (which is why they are repulsed by low SMV men, which is why rape only exists with low SMV men, but you knew this already, no need to expand), something that disgusts them on a primitive level. It’s a system they need to get rid of.. hence the sexual liberation, fighting for rights, fighting for a right to work, etc. no matter how hard men try to keep a society strong and prosperous, women will actively try and tear it all down.

This snowball formed when women were given rights.. it started a snowball effect. Now there are several things that compounded with each other make for a nightmare scenario for the world.

1: women in the work place. Women earn their own money now. A Man’s resources cannot be used as leverage to purchase reproductive rights with a female. Thus his contributions to the tribe are meaningless as his reward holds no value.

2: genetic misrepresentation and contraception. Estrogen frauding Makeup, plastic surgeries, gym to build a high estrogen ass.. all these things are being used to falsely elevate women’s sexual dimorphism, perceived serum estrogen concentration, age, fertility, etc. notice how every foid does makeup the same way. Thin narrow nose bridge, shadows under the zygos to show zygo projection, rounded chin makeup, eyeliner to fraud thick eyelashes (health indicator).. women are walking around looking like top tier specimens the likes of which would make your caveman ancestors balls explode. Tbh they should bow down to partiarchy that they’re able to walk around like this alone and not immediately be gangraped when they step out of the house looking like they sweat pure estrogen and fertility. And lastly contraception.. things like birth control, condoms and abortion make casual sex and being a whore consequence-free. It’s the reason the cock carousel exists.

3: easy access to a global sexual market. The tribe is no longer a handful of guys and girls with the top guy doing all the fucking. Smartphones, Tinder, Instagram, cars, planes, buses, etc all help make the sexual marketplace a global thing.. in essence it’s an 8 billion member tribe, with easy access to all types of chad dick. Far more competition among males and a far lower sexual success rate among the male population.

4: destruction of religion. Religion isn’t really a thing anymore. It was once a powerful tool to convince women that 1:1 mate pairings are what’s to be expected, no sex before marriage, shit like that (had other reasons too. Keeps men’s testosterone at bay, thou shall not kill, steal, etc. keeps things civil) .. They had a reason to abide and ignore their primal instincts. It did a pretty good job.. now that’s gone, and there’s virtually no way of enforcing monogamy and chastity. Which funny enough, is also the only prerequisite for a woman to get married.. just be a virgin. They can’t even manage that yet a bunch of captain save a hoes are quick to wife em up, and these hoes will wear white on their wedding day symbolizing their purity.. jfl

Compound these 4 new phenomenon together, and you can quickly see that the sexual market is fucked, and a society with a SMP like this cannot sustain itself.. This is a world that belongs to women now. This world automatically excludes all men unfit for reproduction. In this case, it’s likely over 99% of men. What will these men do once they realize money doesn’t buy pussy? Once they realize that if there’s truly no hope for them, they can rely on government assistance, or work a menial bottom tier job just to make enough to survive. If these men even have the drive to go to work, they will have no drive to innovate, get promotions, invent something, become millionaires, etc. you’ll have a lot of complacent men with no motivation to contribute anything. Best hope automation can replace the entire workforce, and if not, then you got a work force made up of 99% women and just lmao if you think that’s gonna take us anywhere. Women have no incentive to make money other than to rid men of their only leverage and open up their prospective mating options. Same deal with them.. they’ll just aim to make the minimum amount to survive and genefraud enough to land 6’4” chad.

This results is a catalysmic shift of the world as we know it.. there will be a total collapse once the number of men who drop out of society reaches critical mass. But until then, you will see a shitload of people dependent on government assistance, the rich being taxed out the ass, who now have even less incentive to keep perusing high paying careers, more people coping with drugs/alcohol, a spike in suicides and mass shootings, high SMV men forming harems, etc.. basically 2018 x10.

For this to happen, It’s not even necessary for the masses to swallow the blackpill.. it’s only necessary for them to realize money doesn’t mean anything anymore. That’s all it takes. Put simply, one’s contributions to society are no longer worth the effort. It’s basically slave labor at that point.

So there you have it. All the causes are there and cannot be reversed.. things have already been set in motion. just wait till the effects of them become painfully obvious. This cannot be fixed since nobody is gonna accept that women’s vaginas are the reason for this. Maybe next time around men don’t fuck up and start the civilization off strong with commoditized pussy. This will all go down in documented history so a mistake like this likely won’t repeat itself. That’s the good news.

This should be lifefuel for you all. You are witnessing the collapse of the most successful civilization on earth in YOUR lifetime. Pretty cool. So ditch your ER plans, untie your ropes, and Sit back and watch the world burn.

TL;DR; a couple rights here and there and a few apps destroyed the world. Patriarchy, religion, and commoditization and sexual oppression of women are paramount to the existence and survival of any civilization. We lack all 4. It’s over. Bunker up and stockpile food and ammo. We’re going back to the jungle.

David J Stewart quoting Jack Hyles #sexist #fundie #elitist jesus-is-savior.com

[From Jack Hyles’s advice for how to raise a young girl.]

1. Dress her like a girl. Let her have long hair. Let her wear lace and ribbons. Do not let her wear that which pertaineth to a man. Deuteronomy 22:5 says, "The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God." The parent who wants to make a young lady of a daughter should see to it that she does not wear revealing clothes, but that she dresses modestly. I Timothy 2:9 and 10 says, "In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety: not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works."

This must be started early in the life of a girl. If she never wears pants for the first time, she will always wear skirts. If she never wears mini-skirts for the first time, she will always wear skirts of a modest length. In these days of hot pants, mini-skirts, and pant suits, may God give us some old-fashioned mothers and dads who well rear some sweet, feminine ladies for our boys and dress them accordingly.

2. Teach her strict obedience. Other chapters stress the fact that obedience is the most necessary ingredient to be required from the child. This is especially true in the life of a girl, for she must be obedient all of her life. The boy who is obedient to his mother and father will someday become the head of the home; not so for the girl. Whereas the boy is being trained to be a leader, the girl is being trained to be a follower. Hence, obedience is far more important to her, for she must someday transfer it from her parents to her husband.

This means that she should never be allowed to argue at all. She should become submissive and obedient. She must obey immediately, without question, and without argument. The parents who require this have done a big favor for their future son-in-law.

3. She should not be allowed to play alone with boys. The parents should see to it that she plays with other girls. This is important for many reasons. She should play only with toys that are uniquely for girls. This, by all means, should include dolls, doll clothes, housecleaning equipment, dishes, pots and pans, etc. She should participate in sports enough to become coordinated but she should not excel in sports. If later she marries a man who is very athletic, she could become more proficient in some particular sport that he enjoys, but if she becomes an expert in a sport that is usually associated with men and boys, it could prove embarrassing to her future husband, and for that matter, it could entice her to become more masculine than she ought to be.

4. Teach her how to be graceful in sitting, walking, etc. Every mother who has a daughter should be careful to show her how to sit like a lady, walk like a lady, and exhibit propriety and grace in her manners. (Note the chapter on MANNERS.)

5. Teach her to be an intelligent listener and an articulate conversationalist. She should read a variety of good books and magazines and have a wide variety of knowledge. It should be obvious to any male with whom she is conversing that she is an intelligent listener and that she can understand and respond to his conversation. She should never seem to know as much as he does (even though she may actually know more) but enough to talk intelligently about his interests and to make him feel that his conversation is falling on receptive ears and an understanding mind. This means that she should learn all she can about everything, especially things that interest men. For example, she should know football, but she should not play it. There is nothing a man wants any more than to be understood by an intelligent listener.

The wise lady will never "take over" the conversation. She will add just enough to make a valuable contribution and to show her intelligence on the subject, but she will always make her man feel that he is the more knowledgeable. Of course, as a girl like chooses a man, she will want to choose the kind that is at least her equal, the kind that she will not have to dominate, and the kind whose mind and conversation will always intrigue her. This means that the wise mother will teach her girl not to be a wallflower and not to attempt to get by on beauty alone. She will teach her to be the kind of young lady who has a beautiful spirit and a beautiful soul, one who can communicate, one who is understanding, and one who is quietly articulate in conversation.

Though she should not be a football fanatic she should know enough about football to enjoy watching the game with her boyfriend, fiancée, or husband, if he so chooses. It should be obvious to him that she is enjoying the game and that she is knowledgeable about it, but that he can teach her even more.

6. Teach her to make her dad feel like a hero. A young lady that can treat her dad properly is more likely to treat her husband properly. If she makes her dad feel like a man when he is in her presence, she will not doubt make her husband feel like a man when he is in her presence. If the daughter is careful to refill Dad's glass at the table, see to it that he gets the best chair, listen to him intelligently when he talks, participate intelligently, yet meekly in the conversion, she will someday transfer this to her husband and her husband will rise up and call her "blessed."

7. Teach her to have the proper heroines. The mother should be very careful to see to it that the daughter does not idolize Hollywood starlets, female athletes, etc., but rather, feminine, yet successful women like the Bible characters Hannah and Elisabeth, and characters in history like Susannah Wesley and Elizabeth Barrett Browning. Also point out feminine ladies whose path is crossed by the daughter and lead her to emulate them. It is very important that the young lady, even the girl, look up and idolize the right kind of people.

8. Teach her not to be too forward to boys. A young lady should not initiate a correspondence. If she cars for a boy she may respond to him with courtesy and feminine reserve so as to let him know she like him, but she should not be the aggressor, neither should her respond except within the bounds of propriety and right. It certainly is not proper for a young lady to call a young man on the telephone for a social talk, If there is obvious business, it may be done with reluctance, but it should never be done when the call is strictly for social purposes.

9. Do not show off her talent to others. As is mentioned elsewhere in this book it is far better for a parent to compliment character than talent. Many children have been ruined because their parents were too proud of them and their performances. This not only hurts the child but it disgusts other adults. In such cases the child receives far too much attention and then wants it for the rest of her life. Hence, she becomes maladjusted. Let her gain her own attention by her performance. Let her attract her own audience by her own ability and opportunities, not by the insistence of a mother or father who is overly proud of a daughter.

10. Let her do things that enable her to be a necessary help to another who is in the limelight. This is very important for a young lady. That is why learning to accompany a soloist is good training for a girl. Learning to take dictation is also good training. Both of these things train her to be a necessary helper to someone who is in the limelight. The Bible teaches that a woman is made not for the limelight but to complement and supplement. Proverbs 32:23 says, "Her husband is known in the gates, when he sitteth among the elders of the land."

The girl should be taught that her lot in life is to be obedient and helpful to her husband. Hence, if as a girl she can perform supplemental duties that are vital, she will be better equipped to be a well-adjusted lady. It is more important that a young lady be an accompanist on a piano than a concert pianist. Parents who train their daughter in this manner will someday be called, "blessed," by their son-in-law.

11. Teach her to pull for her dad. The wise mother will teach the girl to make a hero of her father and always pull for him. She should pull for him in business and do all she can to help. She should pull for him in any athletic contest and do all she can to cheer him to victory. In everything he does she should stand on the sidelines and root for her dad. She is being taught to root for the biggest man in her life and to cheer and spur him on to bigger heights. When she is married she will transfer this to her husband and will be a great encouragement to him.

The mother must teach the daughter that when the father is a success the daughter is also a success. She is a very vital part in his success, and as a member of the team she can share the victory and the spoils. When this attitude is properly developed she will feel the same way when she is married. When the husband wins a victory it will be a team victory rather than a victory just for him.

12. Teach her to plan for a profession but to hope that it will not be needed. Mothers and fathers should teach their daughters to train for some kind of profession that is always in demand. There is always the possibility that the daughter will never marry or that she will become a widow with children to rear and will not remarry. Because of this she should plan to pursue some profession that will enable her to support herself and her children in any eventuality. She should be taught that if possible, she should not follow this profession when married. This gives her a dependence, if the opportunity arises to be dependent, but an independence if needed. There are many professions that a young lady could pursue such as that of a school teacher, beautician, secretary, nurse, etc.

13. Teach her the sanctity of the body. Teach her that boys should keep their hands off and that her body should be clean in every way. She should care for her body. She should be well groomed and physically clean. Then she should also be moral and virtuous. Talk with her about situations which arise in the lives of most young ladies. Teach her how to handle each situation. Explain to her that that is the reason she should not be in a car alone with a boy. Teach her what to do if improper advances are made. Let her be conscious of the fact that her body is a very sacred thing and should always be treated as the temple of the Holy Spirit.

14. Teach her to do feminine chores. As is mentioned elsewhere it is better for a girl to do the dishes than the yard, to wash the pots and pans than the car, to clean the bedroom rather than the garage. She should do the duties that she will do when she is married and a successful mother and wife.

Much stress should be placed on the importance of her working hard. It is not feminine to be lazy. In fact, it is quite feminine to work hard. It is not working hard that makes one unfeminine; it is the doing of masculine tasks. Wise is that mother who teaches her daughter that good hard work is feminine and that the work a woman should do should be that of feminine chores.

15. Let her be around feminine women. Teach her to associate with ladies who are feminine. Point them out to her when she is a little girl and tell her they are the ones she should copy and emulate. Let these ladies be those who dress like ladies, talk like ladies, walk with feminine grace, sit with feminine charm. Let these be ladies who are good mothers and who have poise, dedication, chastity, consecration, and spirituality.

16. Let her baby-sit. It should be remembered that someday she will no doubt be a mother. She can prepare herself for this and train for it by caring for little ones while she is a teenager. When a girl gets around thirteen, she should becomes acquainted with taking care of little babies and small children. Her motherly instinct will be developed and nourished. This is very important in preparing her to be a successful and happy mother.

17. Let her care for younger girls in the family. Let her dress them, do their hair, wash their faces, etc. Even a girl seven or eight can care for a little sister. She should be encouraged to do so. This will teach her to fulfill responsibilities, to carry the load in the family circle, to work hard, and to prepare herself for motherhood.

18. Allow her to do no loud shouting or hollering. In fact, such should not be a part of anyone's household. The business of rearing children can be transacted without shouting or fussing. Especially should this be true in a girl, for the parent is to try in every way to make her quiet, meek, and feminine.

19. With the passing of the years, let her shop more for herself, and if she has younger sisters, let her aid them in doing their shopping. This will teach her to care for her own person and also for the needs of others.

The most noble goal that parents can set for their daughters is to help them become Christians. The second most noble goal is to lead them to be ladies, for one of the great needs of our generation is Christian ladies. May God use this chapter to make it so.

ToxicPersonality #sexist #psycho incels.co

Im going to touch female coworker

I will touch female coworker now when i go there in a few days. Ass and titties. This will satisfy me and i will press my cock against her ass. It will be very enjoyable for me

Nice larp greycel.

I have already "bumped" into her on "accident" a few times. Its a small space with many of us so its believable that i could have because people are bumping into each other all day basically. But this time i will grab her waist and touch her nice ass with my cock

Hello cucktear infiltrator

Typical Greycel post

This cunt is obviously a foid infiltrator. Every thread it posts on has some stupid and/or larping bullshit like this mods need to get their act together tbhngl

Its not my fault that you are low t and dont want to put ur dick against womens asses.

”He is saying he will sexually assault them.

OP, rub one for me.”

When did he say that? He said he was gonna partake in normal interactions that happen in work day.
I wouldn't advise it personally due to metoo, I don't even meet with foids alone, unless they are western foids, because a noodle might not just metoo me for being ethnic, she might even have me organ harvested

If you look it up there was only like 2k lawsuits for workplace sexual harassment but lkke 5million was touched

They would lynch you if you were accused of fiddling a noodlewhore. Stay safe dude. The way OP wrote it seems as if he is going to be against her will.

She wont say anything due to my t mogging every soy shes met, i dont believe anyone shes worked with there has enough t to press his cock on her infront of everyone. I will satisfy myself in a truly blackpilled high t manner and everyone will tremble before my awesome power

Based gropemaxxer, mogs me.

Thanks guys. I will grope her titties and ass good when i work next. She will be my cum slave because my high t blackpilled groping will make her animal brain submit to me as my personal cum dumpster and fuckhole.

Wagiecel #sexist incels.co

[JFL] I have wondered for ages why I always had trouble with foids and could never get along with them

The answer was pretty obvious all along.

I was a sub 8 male whos ugly and not tall enough.

Any way of acting that does not involve being a simp orbiter to a female is offensive in this day and age.

And I have trouble doing that coz I'm not NT or a normie. I don't automatically bow down to anyone or give them all my respect by default.

No wonder foids hate my guts. It was so obvious all along.

Sub 8?! Depend how far you are from 8

Since I pretty much have issues with every foid I met, i have to be pretty damn far

Ugly_equals_Death #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Blackpill] The root of the incel problem is planned children and birth control. YOU RARELY SEE A FEMALE ONLYCHILD ULTIMATE BLACKPILL NO ONE WANTS DAUGHTERS

Title. Tbh it sounds very simple and people will say "no it is hypergamy the media and daa jooos!!1!1" but honestle the inballance male to female ratio is the real problem. I mean incels wouldnt exist if there where an excess of young females. And ((science)) says shit like, in good times more boys are born. But this isnt even an explenation because even with the natural excess of males (more male sperm is produced due to higher premature death rate of men) the ratio wouldnt be this fucked up like it is today in young generations.

And i am talking about the west, not about places like asia or muslim countrys.

And my explenation is this.

People dont want daughters they want sons, males and females hate daughters. Women hate each other and men hate women they cant fuck.

And this leads to a very specific reproduction pattern:

People start a family and get there first child

-->if its a son they stop reproducing OR get another child
-->if its a daughter they ALLWAYS get another child

-->if they have 2 female children they ALLWAYS STOP REPRODUCING! no one wants 3 daughters.
-->if they hit the number of children they can provide for they usually stop reproducing (white people do it like this usually)

If they have 2 children its most of the time a older sister and a brother or 2 daughters.
If they have one child its allways a son.

You rarely see a female onlychild or a younger sister and older brother because NORMIES ARE BLACKPILLED THEY KNOW SONS ARE BETTER THEN DAUGHTERS THEY DONT WANT TO RAISE CHADS HOLES.

No matter what they say look at the numbers look what they do. Also if you see people with 3 children its most of the time 3 sons or 2 sons 1 daughter because people who have 2 daughter stop reproducing no one in the world can take the burdon to raise 3 daughters, no one, if they hit the 2 daughters mark they instantly stop. 2 daughters is the most a man can take, no sane mane would risk raising 3 times chads whore.

TLDR: no one wants a daughter, and 2 daughters is the MAXIMUM a man can bare to have, while hed be happy to have 20 sons.

various MRAs #sexist reddit.com

Woman tries to hang her child and grievously injures many in her attempt to flee. Is completely let off the hook because "her children need her"

(ArmondDillo)
Well she can murder them while still inside her, it's her body. After they're out, it's still her right, they came from her body. There are university professors which argue that murdering babies, ones that have been born, is moral. Feminists agree. Hillary Clinton was all for it.

(Sbeast)
She's proven by her behaviour she is not safe around children, and will try to murder them even though they are innocent, and yet the judge thinks they need to be together. WTF are they smoking!?!?

(The_Best_01)
They're smoking good ol' gynocentric bias. It's a hell of a drug kids.

(mrmcdude)
Well, you saw the picture of her crying in court. What was the judge supposed to do? Hold her responsible?

(VantagePoint2018)
To be fair, the claim isn't just "she's a woman" they are claiming abuse and mental illness nullify any ulterior motive.

"Karia’s young adult son from a previous marriage, Denys, wrote a letter to the court alleging that his father was abusive to Karia over many years since he met her and married her through a Ukrainian agency. He wrote that he would “menace” her with a gun and commit other acts of physical abuse"

At least according to her son and his audio recordings in this Star Tribune article that was posted here hours ago.

http://www.startribune.com/minneapolis-daycare-provider-who-hanged-toddler-from-noose-to-be-sentenced/488290231/

(Sbeast)
According to that logic, anyone can try to murder children and not go to prison as long as they have experienced some abuse in their life...

(ronin_in_the_wind)
That was the premise of a recent article advocating that women shouldn't go to prison because most crimes committed by women are a response to past abuses... the implication being that guys commit crimes because they're inherently evil.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/01/why-we-should-close-womens-prisons-and-treat-their-crimes-more-fairly

(Luchadorgreen)
Misandric BS. The truth is that most people who commit crimes have probably had abuse at some point in their history.

(The_Best_01)
Written by the Gulag Guardian, no less. What a surprise.

(_pulsar)
Fuck that shit. I can see it being relevant if she murdered the dude who allegedly abused her, but she tied a noose around a child's neck and hung him up to die. I don't care what other people have done to you, if you hang a fucking child you should rot in prison forever.

(HeForeverBleeds)
This kind of thing honestly pisses me off more than anything

I posted about it here before, but when I was 5, my parents separated and my mother was given custody automatically, even though my dad was also trying to get custody and despite the fact that my mother was convicted for sexually abusing my dad, since he was 13-years-old when I was born, 12 when my mother got pregnant. Needless to say, my life with her was a living Hell

Anyone who hurts or abuses a child has already proven herself to be a danger to children, so obviously is an unfit parent. It's common sense that should go without saying. Yet this bullshit "children belong with their mothers" and "women are naturally good with kids" is so deeply ingrained that even pieces of shit like this cunt and my mother are allowed to raise children

Meanwhile, good men are being denied even joint custody

(Kyle_Fischer)
Oh good! So, if a woman ever did that to my son and I killed her, then I wouldn’t be sentenced to any prison because my son needs me. Amiright?

(GingerRazz)

I think this is not necessarily about men’s rights but rather about the justice system being fucked up. This goes far beyond „women get more sympathy from judges“, I don’t think it happened just because she’s a woman

Give me an example where something like this happened to a man. Give me one example where a man gets murderously violent at his child and then gets mercy because his kids need their dad.

I don't know of any such examples, but I remember multiple cases similar to this where the accused/guilty is a woman.

luxeluxeluxe #sexist reddit.com

As A Rich Femcel Should I Avoid Marriage At All Costs ?!

I’m a 26 year old femcel. My mom passed away and left me 9 million in trusts and 3 million in property. I think I give up on dating.

Being a rich femcel is the worst.

Because instead of being FA you DO attract men. Lots of them. Especially ones who want to marry you but it’s legit only for money.

Being a rich femcel is the absolute worst because all you attract is the sort of mother fucker who is predatory enough to want to marry you and hopefully bump you off or divorce you quickly. This sort of person could commit murder for money.

I have no motivation to marry. Seriously.

Being ugly is a curse but tbh I think being ugly and rich is more trash because you’re even more acutely aware how awful people are. People will happily fuck and even marry you if they think there’s a dollar at the end of it. This is the worst feeling on earth.

I’m known in the country club scene in my town and I literally have sociopathic chad types hit on me who aren’t attracted to me hoping for somewhere to live.

I’m ugly AF.

I know I AM

I also live in a penthouse apartment in one of the most expensive cities in the world and I’m not short of pretty bums trying to bum off me. I had a chad try and pump and dump me then he saw my apartment and asked me move in.

I’ve literally had Chads hear where I live and hit on me. It’s gross.

Women get a wrap for being gold diggers and being willing to marry short ugly men but in this economy I’ve found many men willing to do the same.

Many.

Being a rich femcel is trash. The fact you are acutely aware there’s a sociopathic bummy chad willing to fuck and impregnate or marry you for a dollar is the worst feeling

I’m not paying for a man so I’m staying alone.

All I attract are men with a motive. Usually sociopathic predatory creeps.

I’m staying single I think

Props to you for being able to recognize fakeness and not being gullible. You still have a lot of things going for you TBH. Obviously, don't let any of these guys move in with you quickly, that shit is sketchy as fuck. And if you ever do get involved in anything serious, get that motherfucker to sign a prenup no matter how much he protests, no matter how much he "loves" you.

On the upside, you have the resources to take care of a child if you want to have one, even if the father abandons. You have the ability to have a daughter with Chad genetics mixed in, as well. You have a chance at having a pretty daughter, pinkpilling her on moids, and giving her a shot at the life you could never live. Hell, it sounds like you have enough money to choose the sex of your baby as well (so that you don't end up having a douchey Chad son, lol).

I really do wish you the best in whatever you choose to do. You don't need those leeching assholes in your life. You sound a lot like me + a bunch of money lol.

LMAO! How did you know?! My plan is to do gender selection and raise 2 daughers alone and pinkpill them. That is my life goal. Any man I marry will likely fuck off anyway. I AM NEVER MARRYING. AT BEST I'LL LIVE WITH SOMEONE. I'm doing gender selection to have 2 girls and putting my money in trusts for them till they're 35. lol

Haha, I'm a bit blackpilled myself. You stated some of my viewpoints in the OP; great minds think alike they say ;)

Never marrying is an excellent idea sister. What good could ever come from getting government agencies involved in your romantic affairs? Divorce proceedings are used to fuck moids over routinely. You can bet these guys are looking to turn the tables on you at the first opportunity...That is if you don't "accidentally" drown in the bathtub one day, leaving him with all of your money.

After my experience with the last one. I've come to the conclusion I can't put them in ANY position where me dying will benefit them. There are simply tooooo many ways for a man who lives with you daily to fake your death as accidental. The sociopathic chad actually TOLD ME 'I'll bury you and no one would ever find you' so yah. I don't put it past anyone to kill their wife for money. If people do it on 48 hour mystery and date like for a few hundred thousand dollar life policies I don't doubt what someone would do for 12 million.

I also have NO family left so he could bump me off and no one would realise quickly.

metabuxx, Gymcelled & BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist incels.co

(metabuxx)

[Blackpill] It's over for ugly men

image

r/FemaleDatingStrategy
Posted by u/EAT_MY_ASS_MOIDS
Woman is flooded with handsome men who want to date her. There are too many hot guys to stay stuck on any one dude. Daily reminder to take ZERO shit from losers who are easily replaceable!

r/dating
Posted bv u/thatshawtvo
Overwhelmed by dating prospects
I Need Advice
I (25F) have been a little more seriously OLDing and I am wondering how the hell to properly juggle all the guys trying to date me from OLD (This is not a bragging post I'm dead serious and need advice). I recently made the mistake of actively super-swiping and while I was excited to see the matches, now all these guys are asking to meet up. All are attractive and I want to give all of them a chance but holy hell, I'm strug- gling with fitting them all onto my schedule (Both guys I've already met asking for more dates as well as new matches wanting to meet) and I'd like some advice. Does anyone have advice on how to properly handle this situation? How do I say "Ill be busy at that time" without any of these guys taking it as "She's not interested"? How do you avoid super swiping? How to keep conversations going with all till we actually meet?

Found this one r/FemaleDatingStrategy. This whore talks about how she right swipes every hot Chad she finds on Tinder and how she wants to give to them all a taste of her rotten, used up pussy. But that's not what intrigued me because everyone knows that all a foid wants is Chad's dick filling up her holes.

The thing which did intrigue me was the other foids in the comment section asking the user where she lived. They were all complaining that there aren't any attractive guys who lived close to them who they could right swipe. One foid wrote "99.99% guys living close to me are ugly as shit". She also wrote that the secret to finding a nice guy is "swiping left on the ugly ones and swiping right on the attractive ones." Another foid pointed out that she didn't even read their profiles before right swiping, for her the only criteria was looks.

These comments are enough to conclude how much foids despise ugly men. They don't care about anything other than looks. Many attractive men are waiting in line to fuck foids so if you're ugly then you have absolutely zero chances. And all the cucks who think that working on their personality is gonna help them get laid, FOIDS DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT IT. If a guy is ugly then he is a just a disgusting creep and biological waste for them. No one cares about ugly men, not even ugly foids because Chads fuck them too.

(Gymcelled)

Gotta love /r/FDS. Its the only space on the interwebs where whores think out loud. No virtue signalling, no manipulation. Just foids being foids.

And we're still the delusional ones according to normies, we're the hateful ones, we're the ones making shit up.

(BabyFuck McGirlsex)

Thats a Hiroshima Nagasaki blackpill
Foids are degenerate eugenicists - but ironically ugly foids are celebrated by society(no fat shaming teehee) and degenerate foids are celebrated by society (no slut shaming teehee) incompetent foids are celebrated by society (diversity hire! Teeheee)
Foids hold men to extremely high standards that they themselves cant measure up to and cant ever attain themselves ( a 2/10 roastie demands nothing less than 8/10 chadlite jfl)

Its Over boyos

Edmund_Kemper #wingnut incels.co

[Venting] Bluepilled cucks like IT, white knights, feminazis, normies, etc. are just NPCs who only agree with whatever society says

they all think of themselves as free-thinkers, but they aren't even remotely free-thinkers. they are cowardly faggots who don't have the balls to think for themselves. they think they accept homos and trannies because "it's the right to do" when in reality they only accept them because they're forced to accept them by society. they think women are equal to men because society forces them to think that. they think incels are bad because society forces them to think that. they think attraction to anyone under 18 (or under 21) is pedophilia because society teaches them that and will crucify you if you disagree. they think that curries have just as much SMV as caucasians because they're taught if you disagree you're an evil racist who should be killed. these people only think these things because society teaches them to think these things.

if these faggots lived in the 1950s, they would've HATED gay people and trans people. only a tiny minority of americans back then thought homosexuality was acceptable and if they think they're part of that 1% from back then who would've accepted homos then they're unrealistic retards. In 1958, only 4% of americans approved of interracial marriage. if they lived back then, they would've HATED interacial marriage. they cannot seriously think they'd be part of that 4%. if they lived in the antebellum era, they would've HATED black people and would've had a racial bias against them. if they lived in ancient greece, they wouldn't have any problem with a 30 year old man marrying a 15 yr old foid and most likely would've married a 15 yr old at age 30 if they were male or married a 30 yr old man if they were female.

if they lived in a world where bestiality was accepted, they would accept bestiality and wouldn't wanna be called an evil bestialiphobe by SJWs. if they lived in a world where incest (without pregnancy) was accepted, they would accept it. if they lived in a world where polygamy was normal, they'd accept polygamy. if they lived in nazi germany, only 1% of them would be brave enough to resist hitler. people who think they would've resisted hitler are unrealistic. people who think they'd resist kim-jong-un are unrealistic.

then they see us disagreeing with what society says and they feel threatened. this is why they hate the blackpill and promote the bluepill. they think we live in a fair world where a deformed curry manlet can get a gigastacy

Janna Darnelle #fundie thepublicdiscourse.com

[Janna Darnelle explains how her life was ruined when her husband came out as gay, divorced her, gained custody of the children, and married another man.]

My Children Deserve Better

Our two young children were willfully and intentionally thrust into a world of strife and combative beliefs, lifestyles, and values, all in the name of "gay rights." Their father moved into his new partner's condo, which is in a complex inhabited by sixteen gay men. One of the men has a 19-year-old prostitute who comes to service him. Another man, who functions as the father figure of this community, is in his late sixties and has a boyfriend in his early twenties. My children are brought to gay parties where they are the only children and where only alcoholic beverages are served. They are taken to transgender baseball games, gay rights fundraisers, and LGBT film festivals.

Both of my children face identity issues, just like other children. Yet there are certain deep and unique problems that they will face as a direct result of my former husband's actions. My son is now a maturing teen, and he is very interested in girls. But how will he learn how to deal with that interest when he is surrounded by men who seek sexual gratification from other men? How will he learn to treat girls with care and respect when his father has rejected them and devalues them? How will he embrace his developing masculinity without seeing his father live out authentic manhood by treating his wife and family with love, honoring his marriage vows even when it's hard?

My daughter suffers too. She needs a dad who will encourage her to embrace her femininity and beauty, but these qualities are parodied and distorted in her father's world. Her dad wears make-up and sex bondage straps for Halloween. She is often exposed to men dressing as women. The walls in his condo are adorned with large framed pictures of women in provocative positions. What is my little girl to believe about her own femininity and beauty? Her father should be protecting her sexuality. Instead, he is warping it.

Without the guidance of both their mother and their father, how can my children navigate their developing identities and sexuality? I ache to see my children struggle, desperately trying to make sense of their world.

My children and I have suffered great losses because of my former husband’s decision to identify as a gay man and throw away his life with us. Time is revealing the depth of those wounds, but I will not allow them to destroy me and my children. I refuse to lose my faith and hope. I believe so much more passionately in the power of the marriage covenant between one man and one woman today than when I was married. There is another way for those with same-sex attractions. Destruction is not the only option—it cannot be. Our children deserve far better from us.

This type of devastation should never happen to another spouse or child. Please, I plead with you: defend marriage as being between one man and one woman. We must stand for marriage—and for the precious lives that marriage creates.

LonelyDalek #fundie reddit.com

I think humans are flawed beings, and are still animals. We are only 1.5% away from being a chimp. So while we try to rationalize our opinions and decisions, a lot of it is driven by our instincts and biology. The basic goal of biology is self-preservation and procreation. Males’ role in the ancient nomadic life-style was that of hunters and gatherers – so men’s biology leans towards self-preservation a little more. As humans started organizing into small groups and then into societies, the definition of ‘self’ in self-preservation expanded to include everyone else that belong to the same group as them. Being self-preservation-oriented thus came to mean to guard those of their own and to destroy any threats. So men became more comfortable being in violent situations, and engaging in life-risking behaviors. The negative side of male nature, if there is one, is this: being open to violence, that we’d let a confrontation escalate to fists being thrown, because we really don’t find much of a problem with punching our differences out. The primary victims of male nature, thus, are not the other gender. It is those who’ll stand in our way to securing a safe future.

However, it is a different case when it comes to women. The primary victims of female nature ARE men. Women’s nature is procreation oriented, because it is their bodies that carry the wombs to gestate and deliver the next generation. It seeks to secure a stable inflow of resources while being incapacitated in the process of child-rearing. This makes men,the resource-procurers, the primary targets of female nature. In this paradigm of things, there is no incentive for the women to actually give a damn about the well-being of the man/men providing for her; in fact, it is in her best interest to not be attached to a single man in particular, but keep monkey-branching to a stronger, better provider.

Lionesses don’t particularly care when the male of the pride is killed by a new, younger male and then kills the cubs. They go on about like nothing’s changed. most women are not evil, they are un-empathetic to men’s plight, and heartlessly oblivious to our suffering.

So, naturally we have the odds against us, but the gynocentric westerns society turns it up several notches. Every harmful aspect of male nature are restrained and kept well-checked by the law. That’s why most men are not murderers, though many men are perfectly capable of murder. Any and every aspect of male nature that’s unsuitable for the modern civilized life have been outlawed, with severe repercussions if engaged-in.
But no such social or legal protection exists against harmful aspects of female nature- women’s tendency to take advantage of men, their actions that drive men to harm themselves and others, and the systems built over men’s corpses for the exclusive benefit of women. Combine this with the fact that women are unsympathetic towards men, and we have the perfect recipe for disaster. Women are oblivious to the harms they cause, and any voice trying to educate them are muffled and marginalized, and women are encouraged to engage in their careless ways by the society, of course, at the expense of men. So, no, I don’t hate women…. they are just completely, and irredeemably unlovable.

The only logical thing for men to do is to educate themselves and each other, and stay away from women as much as possible. Find ways to discipline one’s sexual neediness- through practices like martial arts, meditation or things like working out that’ll leave you too tired to be horny. But what ever you do- do not touch a female with a (your) ten-foot pole.

House Mouse Queen #sexist 4thwavenow.com

It seems to me, after reading comments about daughters who have swallowed the trans kool aid, that these daughters need to have social outlets that are gender critical, ie, a new set of social media sources. One mother explained that their daughters are focusing more on peers than parents and this leads me to think that these young daughters need to be pointed away from transactivist social media and onto radical feminist gender critical social media.

We radfems have been out on social media writing and making videos for years and this is exactly where these daughters have to be. This, in my view, is the prime purpose of the gender critical blogs, youtube channels, reddit, tumblr, etc. Point your daughters to our sites. Let them do the rest.

Various incels #sexist incels.co

(RopeShow)
Even a foid with no vagina whatsoever can score a chadlite.

(video about a young woman with Müllerian agenesis, a birth defect where most of the internal genitalia fail to form)

And also a reminder:
Even if you're Chad, if you have no dick you will be discarded or turned into a betabuck as soon as a foid knows it.

(AfrikanCel)
Is it trans?

If it is naturally a foid without a vagina I would marry her. Guaranteed virgin and lifelong blowjobs.

:feelsrope:

(unwanted)
3:18 She has a Chad :feelsrope:

(_wifebeater_)
Even chads are desperate cucks these days.

(Nautica19ß3)
The only thing that can MAYBE make a women be incel is if she was nothing but a brain,heart, and nerves in a jar attached to a machine that allows her to communicate with people,

(AfrikanCel)

Even chads are desperate cucks these days.

It is OVER

(notgoingtomakeit)

Is it trans?

If it is naturally a foid without a vagina I would marry her. Guaranteed virgin and lifelong blowjobs.


Lol. You think she would give you a lifetime of blowjobs even without a vagina? Think again Mr Popo.

(AfrikanCel)
At least I will be loved by a virgin.

(SelfCrucified)
Wrong again. She definitely gave up the ass for chad, Tyrone, brad, etc in her teens or college years

(AfrikanCel)
It is OVER

(big nose bug eyes)
Hell I'd date her just because being with an attractive girl increases your status a few points.

(UBERCEL)

The only thing that can MAYBE make a women be incel is if she was nothing but a brain,heart, and nerves in a jar attached to a machine that allows her to communicate with people,

High IQ, still people would attach onaholes with glue and pump the machine dry

(Nautica1983)
JFL, people would just put her organs into a sexdoll and fuck her. Females literally cannot be incel

(Damo the incel)
Wtf I thought u might be joking but no this foid has somehow hot here fucking looks match with out even having a sexual organ, and us guys are the shallow ones were told ? I hate femoids so fucking much. Imagine a guy without a dick getting his looks match ? I can't even imagine that because it wouldn't happen in a million years

(Dungcel)

At least I will be loved by a virgin.

Mouthfucking is still fucking, and she has probably blown at least 50 dudes with that pretty face.

Bourbon #sexist incels.co

[JFL] [AWALT] What do foids even talk about??
What do normies usually talk about? especially with foids, i know a few male hobby topics like Guns, videogames and cars but i don't know how i would start a conversation about one of these i usually pushed myself into other guys' conversations mid way trough


and femoids? do they actually talk about anything besides sex? literally since i was 11-12 the first thing i overheard from 11 year old foids back then was that "sex is good because you burn a lot of calories" this was from a foid who was sending nudes to her 16 y/o BF who was chad (she was like 11-12)
all i was hearing from foids is topics about makeup and sex when i was in their vicinity, do these holes actually talk about anything besides that?

i've never had a longer interaction with a foid than the ones where i pay for groceries and say that i'm paying with a card or cash because i got ghosted or laughed at while trying

I've only overheard foids' conversations and they're all about either makeup or sex (when counting sex i count in talking about chad and rating males from 0-10)
They are so carefree and incompetent that they don't know anything else than the things they have been made to do, and that is to make cucks work for them by altering their appearance with makeup and rewarding these cucks with sex for their work and money (and sometimes not even rewarding them at all LMAO)

Sriram #fundie religionethics.co.uk


Hi everyone,

1. First of all....I know people usually tend to take extreme emotional stands rather than a balanced stand. So..the first and immediate argument seems to be to accuse a person of bigotry and hatred of homosexuals. That is wrong. I have no hatred of homosexuals and do not believe that they are sinners or whatever. I believe in letting them live their lives.

2. The comparison of homosexuality with left handedness is moronic at best. Is left handedness abnormal...yes... of course it is! But it is of no consequence and no one gives a damn if someone writes with his left hand instead of the right.

Similarly,is homosexuality abnormal...yes..of course it is! Problem is that it also has serious consequences. Ever heard of survival instinct, procreation instinct and survival of the species?! ::)

If more and more people become left handed nothing will happen. But if more and more people become homosexuals...the human race will be eliminated. So..would the lot of you please stop making such inane comparisons! Thanks!

So...now you know why homosexuality is abnormal. It goes against basic survival and propagation of the species. Should I repeat that?!

3. This is where the research to find reasons for homosexuality becomes relevant. Nobody does any research to find out why a person is heterosexual, by the way!! That is normal and that's the way nature has made us evolve.

If research establishes (as it seems to be doing) that epigenetics is the reason for homosexuality and they do find some treatment...it should be welcomed.....and those who choose to get the treatment should be freely allowed to.

Why the lot of you are hollering on about parents abusing their children is really beyond me!! Shocking! Propagation of the species is a fundamental instinct and parents have a right to expect that their children will procreate and take good care of the offspring.

4. Why all this is such an emotional issue is also beyond me. You people here claim to be very scientific minded (though most of you hardly know any real science, let me add).... but nothing of it is seen here. Everyone is going on and on about it as though it is a battle for dominance. LOL!

Its like some brainwashed or programmed response from most people. Almost the same words, the same examples, the same arguments, the same anger, the same accusations. Like some cult members! Some psychologists really need to do some research on this strange phenomenon.....seriously!

5. I also think perhaps atheism and homosexuality are somehow linked. I know religious people could also be homosexuals and atheists could also be heterosexuals... but someone really needs to check the connection. Maybe its the same genes/epigenes that are responsible for both.

Or maybe given the rigid Christian theology...homosexuals prefer to become atheists. That is also possible.

Atavistic Autist, GoffSystemQB & Lame Dude #sexist incels.co

RE: [HIROSHIMA BLACKPILL] Foid enjoys "rape" from chad

(Atavistic Autist)

I was raped while I was blackout drunk. In reality, I actually really enjoyed the sex even though I couldn't consent, and I told my boyfriend I tried to get him off but I really didn't. I am torn apart by guilt over this.

"teehee, I was drunk" implies that alcoholism doesn't just increase the honesty of your actions and lead to what you would do anyway without your neuroticism inhibiting you.

This foid outright admits to having been capable of verbally refusing the act, at least, but not having done it. Indeed, why would she feel any guilt and shame now if she had truly been without decision-making authority then?

She says that she's lying to her hubby cuck, but continues to lie to le Reddit and even to herself to make herself look better. I hope the fat hubby cuck starts becoming "toxic" and "emotionally abusive" to her out of instinct, and then the relationshit ends as the foid ultimately reinforces her whoredom.

Btw, AWALT.

(GoffSystemQB)

As has been said before. It isn't rape if it's Chad.

"teehee, I was drunk" implies that alcoholism doesn't just increase the honesty of your actions and lead to what you would do anyway without your neuroticism inhibiting you.

Not saying there isn't some truth to this, but if that's the case then there are normies and other guys that foids actually secretly want to fuck. Alcohol is the norman's best friend to getting laid.

Really the only time they will ever experience casual sex is a once in a blue moon encounter with a girl that is at least slightly drunk.

(Lame Dude)

"I was drunk, somebody raped me." I dont have sympathy for you.

Why dont women have a sense of self preservation? Even with a dick, I dont get drunk around people I dont know well.

I went to swim with sharks, but then they bit me. Teach sharks not to bite!

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist incels.co

The RedPill is the Purest Form of Female Worship

By Professor B. McGirlsex, PhD in INCELDOM (Cambridge, UK), M.B.B.S (Kings College, London, UK), BSc (Hons) (APNP)

* The folly of TRP

The redpill - though it acknowledges most of the ancient wisdom enshrined in the Sacred Scientific Blackpill texts - it has one fatal flaw, it promotes Maxxxing inorder to win a foids approval. According to this logic it would mean that you have automatically made foids more valuable than yourself and hence you have to Maxxx (gymmaxxx, wagecuckmaxxx, daygamemaxxx e.t.c) inorder to "earn" a foids sex & attention - things that are naturally entitled to men and all men have an inalienable Right to pussy. By taking the redpill you automatically pedestalize foids into being perfect beings who do not have to do any self improvement whatsoever and simultaneously you relegate men into being inferior beings who have to work hard and maxxx inorder to just get a little bit of foid action.

* The Redpill creates more incels.

foids will see lots of redpillers supplicating themselves to them and essentially treating them like deities and trying all the tricks under the sun to win their approval - this inflates their egos and also raises their standards to astronomical unnatural unattainable standards. Meaning they will disqualify the majority of men who seek romantic LTR's with them and these men end up becoming infected with the Black Plague known as Inceldom.

TL:DR - The RedPill is Pure Poison

Incel Wiki #fundie wiki.incels.info

Blackpill

Your story is there waiting for you, it has been waiting for you there a hundred years,
long before you were born and you cannot change a comma of it. Everything you do
you have to do. You are the twig, and the water you float on swept you here. You are
the leaf, and the breeze you were borne on blew you here. This is your story and you
cannot escape it


-Cornell woolrich, I Married a Dead Man

Blackpill

The Blackpill is an idea, centered in evolutionary psychology, which attempts to explain romantic partnership as stemming from 3 interrelated factors

1. Physical attractiveness

2. Wealth

3. Social Status

Five central themes emerge from this thesis.


1. Looks are necessary to the formation of physical or romantic desire
2. Looks are not distributed evenly among men
3. Looks are not subjective.
4. The Dualistic Mating Strategy
5. Hypergamy


Each one of the five central themes plays a part in deriving Incel Vocabulary. Looks being necessary,unevenly distributed, and objective provides two familiar categories, the Incel and Chad

metabuxx #crackpot incels.co

[Blackpill] Normies need to wake up and see the truth

So much bluepill has been shoved up a normie's ass that it has come spilling out of their mouths. These normies are being brainwashed by foids into believing that they need to work on their personalities, become rich by wage slaving day and night and turn a better man because foids don't like losers, foids like successful and economically attractive men with a stable job. And people spewing this bullshit are none other than their own parents, friends, society and pop culture.

The brainwashing process is so effective that they fail to see the hypergamous nature of foids, they fail to see how the dating world is rigged against sub-8 men, they simply refuse to accept the blackpill. When they see a Chad pumping and dumping foids the first thought which crosses their mind is "He must have a nice personality". When they see foid riding the cock carousel they think "It's her life and her choice, she can have sex with anyone she wants". And at the end of the day when the normie's friend asks him why is he still single he says "I'm studying really hard. Soon I'll be rich and then women will flock to me". And indeed when he turns 30 and becomes rich foids do flock to him. His cucked brain starts thinking "My parents and friends were right all along, women do love successful men". He refuses to accept the fact that Chads got laid even without spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to get a stupid degree or wage slaving day and night.

He fails to see the dark truth that his parents and society were training him all these years to betabuxx some old hag in her 30's who spent the best years of her life riding the cock carousel. He is too bluepilled to realise that the foid he married doesn't loves him, she only lusts after his money. She bites the bullet and keeps providing him with occasional pity sex to keep his faith in the bluepill intact. She cheats on him with Chads and forces him to raise Chad's babies. The normie unaware of her treacherous deceptions keeps providing her and her bastard child with luxury and comfort.

And every time a normie falls in this trap an evil grin spreads across the face of the feminist overlord who spun this whole web of deceiving and bluepilling innocent men.

Endersblade #fundie mmo-champion.com

Male Rape Victim forced to pay Child Support to Rapist.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-owes-more-than-15000-in-child-support-for-daughter-he-fathered-at-14/


Long story short. 20 year old woman has sex with a 14 year old boy. (Which is in Arizona classed as Statutory Rape). 6 years later, the woman sues for Child Support, and wins, during this time he was unaware that he had a child.

Funny enough, he is willing to pay, and is willing to take part in the kids life. His problem is that they also demand backpay for the past 6 years, which he is having a hard time meeting.

And this is not the first time this happens.


This actually happened to my roommate, although both were of age. They went to court over it, and they basically just blew it off like it couldn't happen. She moved states, had the kid unbeknownst to him, and a year later, filed for child support. He's been paying it ever since. He loves the kid, has zero custodial rights, even though the mom is letting the daughter turn into a fucking watermelon. She's 9 and weighs almost 120 lbs.

On subject but different issue, I cannot put into words how absolutely fucking stupid it is to say that a woman raped a male just because he was underage. Because, you know, you don't know jack shit about sex until you turn 18, and then suddenly poof, you're an expert. In that article, it was extremely obvious they were both consenting to what they were doing. To automatically make it rape just because he was 14? We have some seriously stupid fucking laws.

North American Man/Boy Love Association.

Basically, they say that a relationship between a full grown man and a young boy is perfectly fine, as long as there is no coercion..

Considering many cultures around the world already do this, I see nothing wrong with it. Although in their situation it may not always be consensual, at least here (from what little I've read up on the subject) NAMBLA requires consent on both sides for it to be ok.

Many of you seem to forget that even within the past 100 years, it was OK for someone 14, 15, 16 to be married and have kids, usually with an adult. It's something humans have been doing for thousands of years. Then suddenly, a...specific, will leave unnamed...group decided it's just ewwy gross and against their beliefs to be doing things with young, innocent kids who are completely innocent and don't know anything about sex, because they're innocent, you know? So somehow this got ingrained in our society, and now everyone gets up in arms if, even if 17 and almost 18, someone does something naughty with someone under the age of 18. Because 18 has suddenly become this magic number that turns kids into adults, even though, again, not more than 100 years ago people under the age of 18 were having families and holding jobs, contributing to their society.

SadLonelySingle #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Theory] Imagine how based would be a society where women's rights are equivalent to cattle or a dog.

High iq thread alert.

We all know that no women ever wants to have accountability for their actions, it's always the fault of patriarchy, or alcohol, or upbringing, or whatever solipsistic reason she finds on the spot.

Not only that, but they lack the basic logical thought to be able to overcome their instincts for chad cock only, one could argue they do not have the mental capacity to exercise civil rights similar to a man - I must specify that only the non cuckfied man has intellectual gigantism beyond the brains of the mere foid.

Which leads us to the most appropriate conclusion and also revives a similar system that existed for a millenia and proved to yield the best results so far.

It is not feasible of foids to be treated as lifeless objects, however, their mental accomplishments do not ever surpass the biological chad only whoreness intrinsic to their instincts.

Therefore, the same way you can't expect a dog to behave like an intelligent non cucked human being, you can't expect a foid to not act like a degenerate.

The only viable solution to hypergamy would be to classify women's rights as equivalent to cattle or a dog.

In the sense that they're legally protected from the acts of any third party that do not own them, in exchange they would not vote, receive welfare (i.e single mothers), or exercise complex human legally binding volition since it would lead to the degeneracy we witness today.

@Edmund_Kemper @Atavistic Autist @FinnCel @mylifeistrash @Personalityinkwell @Uglyme @78980n @zangano1 @SlayerSlayer @Venomkore @TheNEET thoughts?

znbox #sexist incels.co

The biology of female sexuality

I was thinking and reading about this a lot, also going undercover to female forums and I have built a theory which still has some plot holes but I want to know your opinion.

So, biologically males need to impregnate the most females, and females need the best mate (i.e. Chad). And most of the people still live by biological instincts. Incels who want a wife are superior in this case (or just desperate).

I know for a fact that very few females can get an orgasm from sex. I was lurking into female forums and they were seriously asking each other how to masturbate and what orgasm feels like. I went undercover as a female in some beauty forum and one foid told she could cum for the first time from masturbating at like 23 after having 7-8 partners, but still couldn't cum from sex. I mean the whole discovery was incredible to me, just as when I found out in high school that females too get horny. As far as I understood very few get orgasm from thrusts only, most orgasms come from clitoris which is usually unengaged during sex.

So my theory is that modern females don't want to have kids and families due to peer pressure and propaganda like "job, career, travel" but their bodies tell them they need to be pregnant so they find sex with Chad but can't get orgasms so they need more and more incoming. Their conscious brain thinks everything is fine but their subconscious brain is so fucking surprised they are not pregnant yet so it tells them they need to fuck more because their biology didn't account for condoms or birth control pills.

The conclusion is pretty popular in this forum: it will benefit everyone if females marry young and get pregnant. It will distract them for 5-7 years, and then they must get pregnant again.

Still don't know whether foids have sex because their body makes them pregnant or because they want to cum or maybe it's connected somehow.

Cybersex is our hope #sexist #transphobia incels.co

Feminism imploding because of trannies

So apparently there is a total civil war between faggots/trannies and feminists.
Basically feminists invented gender ideology in the 90's to push feminism into institution without openly using the termine feminism.
Unfortunately foids have zero abstract capabilities so they didn't foresee how it could have backfired in the future.

Now they noticed there are 100% dudes who can say they feel a woman and they must accept them into their sports, toilets, groups, in diversity quotas, retiremen age etc...
So they are backtracking en masse and saying XY individuals can't be considered fully female and tradcucks are backing them.
So there is a funny af shitshow where feminazis and trannies shit on each other all over the web and trannies/faggots are being blackpilled on female nature understanding how foids never form an alliance because of idealism and justice but only for self-interest and pragmatism. Once they don't need you any longer you are thrown under the bus.
Wellcome to the blackpill club, faggots

HueHueBr #crackpot #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] It is virtually impossible for a normie and absolutely impossible for a foid to understand blackpill.

In this topic I will try to prove that it is absolutely pointless to discuss blackpill with normies.

For you to understand an individual's problems, the first requirement is that you have the empathy to put yourself in their shoes. And here the normies will fail miserably. Natural instincts tell them that weak individuals like us must be expelled from the group, making us capable of arousing nothing but pure hatred. Their only wish for us is to see our death.

In the case of foids, it's even worse, because, besides foids having zero empathy for any individual other than another foid, children and chads, their IQ is not enough to understand some concepts. In fact, even low IQ incels have a hard time understanding blackpill in its entirety.

The only exception to this rule is MGTOW normies, and even in their case, only after decades of indoctrination and a high enough IQ. Once they have been forced to study female behavior and all the social changes brought about by feminism, they can understand the incel phenomenon and some of them may feel genuine empathy for us.

FACEandLMS #fundie incels.co

"Son, Your late-40s y/o high-laycount, forward-maxilla, good-IPD, 8/10 lower-third, 6'1 cousin is getting married. This gives me hope for YOU!"

My late-40's yo cousin is going to get married for the first time, so it has given my mum, aunt and et al hope that I will one day. Yes, he is older and balder than me, but let's have a brief rundown of our stats:

Him:

- forward-grown maxilla
- masculine lower third, square chin, long ramus, etc
- wide-set eyes, good IPD, short philtrum
- compact midface
- Did amateur modelling/media work
- lots of sexual experience
- BUT bald and 47 yo.
- 7/10 for age and race

Me:

- retruded maxilla
- retruded lower third (seeking surgery), recessed chin, downward grown jaw with no ramus
- close-set eyes, retard-tier IPD, long philtrum
- long midface
- Got laughed at by women IRL for just existing
- rejections
- but NW4-diffuse and well over a decade younger than him. Go me!!!!
- 2.5-3/10 for age and race

Note, he getting married to a woman from one of the third world countries who have members here. I think they're in love although him being from the first world def helps. But anyway, this gives my aunt and mum hope that I will one day get a gf.

People are a lot more optimistic than they let on. I have actually RESIGNED myself to a MSTOW life. In fact, anything outside that would disrupt my plans. I have kind of PLANNED for living alone and cheaper, retiring alone, dying alone. That's now the PLAN. My instinct when seeing a woman coming the opposite way along the street is to cross over. I just see them as having made their decision about me, which I understand and respect -- I am ugly after all -- so I don't ruin their day by being near them if I can help it.

I've even gotten used to the idea of not having children. I don't want them anymore. I accept my fate. Would I like a gf? Yes? But I can accept how things are. I am a man so I would need to be a 5+ to reproduce. Oh well. Who gaf.

(Emphasis original)

Gants #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Marrying a virgin is cope

Anybody that believes marrying a virgin vs a non virgin will yield a better marriage is completely delusional.

In reality that virgin wife will start desiring Chad's more than non virgin wives.
The virgin wife will see all her friends going out and fucking Chad's, she will see her younger sisters Chad boyfriends, and she will grow jealous of them.
She will think "why should they get to have fun with hot guys while I'm stuck in a marriage with my boring average husband", and this will eventually lead her to cheat. And that first instance of cheating will only be the beginning, now she has tasted what life can be like with Chad, now she knows what shes been missing out on all those years, and she will jump on the cock carousel in full force with no care for the outcome on her marriage.
Virgin wives are a ticking time bomb. It's only a matter of time before she starts trying to compensate for all those miles of dick she was missing out on.

Tim Wilkins #fundie christiananswers.net

I am aware the question in this article’s title presupposes a change of some sort is necessary. My presupposition is grounded in the authority of God’s Word. Secondary to that—I am a Christian and a former homosexual.

Having now used that inadequate and puzzling term former homosexual, let me try to decipher the lingo and properly answer the question.

Moving the fridge

A story will help. A man glances out his home window and sees his neighbor. The neighbor has his pick-up truck backed to his side door, both the storm and main doors are propped open and a refrigerator blocks the doorway. Obviously the fridge is being moved and help is needed, so the friendly onlooker rushes to help his red-faced neighbor.

“Need a hand with that refrigerator, Fred?” asks Steven as he throws himself into the task. “Sure do! This thing weighs more than I thought!”

Fred and Steven throw their muscular arms around the appliance. With sweat rolling down their faces, they grunt and strain as the fridge moves a quarter of an inch then stops. They reposition their arms. The fridge barely sways even though both men are winded. After wrestling with the stubborn refrigerator for a full ten minutes, Steven gasps “Fred, I don’t believe we’re ever going to get this thing in the house.” “In the house!” exclaims Fred, “I’m trying to get it in the truck!”

The point is apparent—without a clear and focused understating of what direction the homosexual needs to go, he will progress no further than the refrigerator.

What needs to change?

An illustration will help. Imagine a very thin lady seated at a dinner table. She fidgets with her food, spoons it from one side of her plate to the other, eats little if anything, then excuses herself from the table.

“How can a visibly gaunt woman eat so little or not at all?”, we ask. Our observation could lead us to two premises—either she dislikes food or she is not hungry. If we accept the first premise—that she dislikes food—our sympathetic approach might include a variety of recommendations.

We inquire about the type of food she does like—maybe fast food, Mexican or Chinese. If not perhaps the immaculate look of a seven-course meal appeals to her appetite. Perchance she prefers her food prepared a certain way—broiled versus fried, rare versus well done. If none of these recommendations help, she could have sitophobia—a fear of food.

Let’s now assume the second premise—that she is not hungry. If this suspicion is true she may be suffering from a malfunctioning metabolism. We make a doctor’s appointment for her. The physician suspects a thyroid condition and orders blood work. And it’s possible she has hypogeusia—a diminished sense of taste.

But as persistent as we’ve been, all approaches make little difference in this lady’s eating habits, or lack thereof. She eats very little and infrequently! Our methods have been genuine, compassionate, and justifiable. We have devoted considerable time in our quest to correct the dilemma, but to no avail.

The puzzle comes together

However, if we learn this woman is anorexic, our approach changes dramatically and immediately. We realize our initial assumptions and strategies are ludicrous and laughable because they do not bear on the primary issue—a distorted self image.

When this self-starved lady looks in the mirror she sees an obese lady looking back and no amount of persuasion will convince her otherwise.

When this primary issue is addressed, her food intake as well as the frequency of her eating increases. But take note—her increased eating is a byproduct of confronting the main issue—a distorted self-image. And I use the term image not only from a clinical perspective but a biblical one. Genesis 1:26-27 reads,

“And God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness’… So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” (Emphasis added)

Now the analogy

How does this illustration apply to the homosexual condition? Just as it is absurd for the anorexic’s family and friends to focus on trying to make her eat, so it is absurd for churches to try and make the homosexual heterosexual.

Society in general and churches in particular mistakenly believe freedom from homosexuality is marrying, having 2.3 children and a dog in the back yard. A 2001 secular study on the possibility of change shows the depth of this ingrained “doctrine.” Dr Robert Spitzer, a Columbia University professor interviewed men and women who said they used to be homosexual; I was one of many he questioned. As beneficial as his study was and as much as I appreciate the visibility it gave to change, his study measured heterosexual function of the former homosexual—again missing the real issue.

“But” you ask, “don’t homosexuals need to become heterosexuals?” No! Scripture never states nor implies all people must be heterosexual; it does say explicitly, however, that we are to avoid all forms of sexual immorality, which includes homosexuality. With that in mind have we not at times given the impression that homosexuals must “convert” to heterosexuality? Jesus did not say “Go and make [heterosexuals]”; He said “go and make disciples.”

The opposite of homosexuality is holiness
“But” you ask, “isn’t heterosexuality the opposite of homosexuality?” No! The opposite of homosexuality is holiness!

As I wrote earlier, the term former homosexual is inadequate if not inappropriate. We mistakenly think a person who has found freedom from same-sex attractions is now heterosexual. The former homosexual man or woman may now experience heterosexual feelings, but heterosexuality should never be his nor the churches’ goal. Heterosexuality is in many cases, but not all, a byproduct of the homosexual’s dealing with the primary issues—a distorted self-image and faulty thinking—both of which Satan uses to “gain control.”

Singleness is not a sin, immorality is
The church will do well to remember that singleness is not a sin, immorality is.

What all this means is that most of churches’ advice to the homosexual misses the mark entirely!

Advice well-meant, but wrong

Telling an adult gay son “you just need to date more; you haven’t met the right girl” is senseless. Suggesting your lesbian friend “marry, settle down and everything will work out” is imprudent. Many gay men and women have married, thinking marriage will “heal” them and in most cases the consequences have been disastrous.

Some, hopefully not Christians, suggest a gay man “find a woman who can make you a man.” While I’ve never heard a Christian give such advice, I did have a twenty-seven year old gay man share the following with me. He said he was fifteen when his “Christian” father learned of his homosexual struggle. To “help” his son the father bought him a subscription to Playboy magazine. That’s equivalent to serving roast duck to the anorexic.

God does not heal one form of immorality with another form of immorality! How effective is a machine gun against a tidal wave?

“For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms” (Eph. 6:12).

One married struggler told me his well-meaning pastor recommended he have more sex with his wife. Although the Bible does command conjugal rights (I Cor. 7:3-4), the pastor’s advice bypassed the real issue.

Another pastor prayed with an unusually handsome and struggling man, then told him “I’ve got a really nice girl in the church I want you to meet.”

A Christian friend who knows my testimony, met my wife Lisa and said “I can see why you left homosexuality; your wife is beautiful.” While he is correct that Lisa is beautiful, his statement, like so many, represents a global ignorance on the subject. If attractive women were the remedy for male homosexuality, there would be no gay men.

Many gay men ask me how to cultivate a romantic/sexual attraction to women. I tell them that is not the issue; the issue is a distorted/broken image. (I have often thought how devious our adversary is. He not only confuses men and women regarding their sexual identity, he also confuses them and the church as to what healing really is, thus compounding the problem.)

By dealing with the primary issue, gay men begin to see themselves as masculine and lesbians begin to see themselves as feminine; the same-sex attractions diminish and in many cases opposite-sex attractions occur.

Not a means to an end

During my own journey out of homosexuality I made a significant discovery—Jesus Christ is not a means to an end. He is the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End. I did not go to Christ to get something else, namely heterosexuality. I went to Christ to get HIM!

When we learn this truth, we will witness prison doors falling off their hinges and chains disintegrating.

ShuckCreations #fundie christianpost.com

[In response to an article about the New York State Supreme Court tossing out a challenge to the new law recognizing same-sex marriages from out of state]

Oh no Igh, I know all too well about how to keep my daughter away from that lifestyle. Let's give a little personal background here:

When I was in college I made several mistakes. One of those included unmarried sex which resulted in an unwanted pregnancy. Well, to try and make things right, even with a struggling relationship at the time, I married her so that my child could be raised with both her mother and father.

After 2 years of marriage she decided she was going to have an affair with another woman. She took my child, my car, and my life away from me. With the grace of God I managed to graduate from college that summer and went to work for a company in my home town. Shortly thereafter I filed for divorce. Almost a year and $15K later I won custody of my daughter. I fought hard to keep my daughter out of the lifestyle her mother had choosen to live and God was on my side! Praise God for that.

Unfortunately she has to stay with her homosexual mom every other weekend. I will continue to teach her about Jesus Christ and pray that I can lay a good foundation so that she will not be overcome by the gay agenda.

SchrodingersDick #sexist incels.co

Most men date women around their age. Hollywood actors date younger because they are Hollywood actors, duh

Survivor bias. Hollywood is full of extremely high SMV men. It’s literally a prerequisite to have looks in order to have access to the money and status that comes with being an actor or otherwise famous person. An actor’s sex life is nothing like the average man’s sex life.

so naturally their dating pools are the largest, and as a man’s dating pool grows, it becomes younger and younger as THAT IS WHAT FEMALE SMV IS. Not that non sentient hole author talking about that 49 year old roastie is a catch because she’s smart and talented or whatever. In the SMP, only genes matter. Only sex appeal. Perceived reproductive success and perceived fighting success. It’s like leftists and feminists reject anything that might be a source of discomfort to some (knowing that SMV is non malleable and there are indeed people superior to you in these metrics). Muh just world view. Muh were all equal. Muh you can be whoever you want to be bro!

but still, most men are with their age match; not because they’re non-misogynistic feminists who see the true value in the female soul or whatever, but because they can’t do better. If they could, they would be fucking much younger girls 100% of the time.

it’s old lady cope. Foids 40+ shouldn’t be complaining about not getting 40 year old millionaire chad. They should be raising grandkids already. They shound have already been out of the sexual market for 20 years. They squandered their JB youth/fertility/attractiveness and are mad that other women arent doing the same.

It’s kinda hilarious that they complain about this because almost every woman goes through a period in her life where she is an extremely valuable, high SMV “catch”.. for the majority of women this is a small window from puberty to like 20. they experience very high SMV and an ability to get virtually any man they want... while the vast majority of men never live a day as high SMV males.. most men live out their lives totally invisible to women from birth to death. Their only sexual success is the Result of low SMV female necessity/desperation. Betabuxxing is not victory. It’s worse than inceldom. Atleast as an incel you have dignity. You are not someone’s slave or ATM, while pretending you are the love of their life.

as always, let’s not expect any reason or logic from females. Always expect olympics level mental gymnastics, and usually 500 different logical fallacies per paragraph.

various commenters #sexist reddit.com

Foid Tries to Prove Blackpill Wrong, ONLY TO PROVE THE BLACKPILL

image

(XxPenisMonkeyxX)
Looks don’t matter Stupid incels... I dated a guy because he was hot even though he was abusive.....

Can IQ be negative?

(RNAcel)
LMFAO

that chad made this slut degrade herself sexually and all it took was some shitty poems and pretending to be schizo hahaha

(karmaawhoreee)
>held my mouth open with tooth picks and came inside

>made me act like a dog on the floor

HAHAHAHA WHO WANTS TO BETABUX THIS ONE?

(MMDT)
I cannot believe this is real. I just cannot. Its the most pristine example of meme gender ever seen.

(NukaColaCel)
He was such an asshole I broke up with him after 2 weeks

For 6 months he abused me and I couldnt tell before other people had to convince me he had a bad personality

For some reason I think this story doesn't make me sound like a complete retard

(Bill_Self)
This is a joke right? Self awareness seems to be entirely non existent

IncelPolitik #sexist #wingnut incels.co

Another low SMV femoid grifter in the incelosphere. You're not going to become /OurGirl/. Rowan, become a tradthot, you'll have better luck with that.

This blown-out roastie whose been making videos for months on us in a desperate attempt to become the Lauren Southern, /OurGirl/ of the Incelosophere literally made a 20 part video series on the Scientific Blackpill (https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill) entry, the most visited and carefully edited page, on incel.wiki.

Incels are not bluepilled simps/orbiters desperate for the touch/affection of a woman. We're blackpilled and know the truth of female nature much more scientifically and rigorouously than 99.9% of men in the world, you're going to keep making video after video after video and none of us are going to magically drop into your DM's and say "ROWAN, I'M A HANDSOME SHY BOY WITH A HIGH PAYING JOB WHO JUST HAS LOW SELF-ESTEEM. I'M DESPERATE AND I'LL DATE ANYONE, WILL YOU GO OUT WITH ME? YOU'RE INCEL GRIFT WORKED! I WAS ON THE FORUM, SAW YOUR VIDEO, IT SNAPPED ME OUT OF MY FALSE SELF-BELIEFS AND NOW I WANT TO MARRY YOU! <3"

We're self-labelled incels (as opposed to the usually external-labelling that's internally rejected, e.g., "ok, incel" -women). We're woke.

This woman is pathetic. Look at the shitty tat on her shoulder. *read the comment I left under her video*

I would unironically rather commit suicide than listen to her breakdown the entire scientific blackpill page with her smoothbrain femoid takes. If I was a political prisoner and the CIA wanted to extract information out of me about the secret operations of I.N.C.E.L., this would probably be the only tactic that could force the information out of me. It would be more torturous than electrocution, sensory depravation, solitary confinement, truth serum... I don't think anything else would cause me to crack but if I to listen to this entire series... that would do it.

My friend who run Mens Rights News and I are going to do a 200 part video serious on that webpage so that it's an easily digestible, smooth listening format for people with low attention spans who don't want to read the page, basically normies. I was writing the script for him to read and the thought popped in my head if anyone else had already done it and I came across this horrifically and abysmally poor attempt at what me and my friend are hoping to do (but with the attention is deserves and with high craftsmanship).

I watch his YouTube videos and he still falls for every foid, he even fell for naama kates when she even interviewed him and there's some fat foid called jojo commenting on all his videos and he falls for her and called her good looking in many replies to her, I always used to look up to him as the most hard-core incel foid hater but every man is the same at the end of the day, biological instincts

Princess Naama isn't even cute. IRL, she wouldn't get a double glance in public from men on the street but on the internet, in incel land, she's Stacy... these women suck. We srsly have to do everything in our power to force women out of our spaces because they just disrupt our discussion of the important issues (blackpill theory).

Yea i always thought naama was overrated but i remember grotesque saying that she was an actor and model before

Bro, all women say that and there are morbidly obese models and down syndrome models. Ever since the feminists began their crusade on common sense objective beauty standards, saying "i'm a model" just tells me you're vain.

AccountError #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Foids would be anti- refugees if we only let in foreign foids

Foids win with the current refugee crisis, it's overwhelmingly men which means more competition for men, inflated pussy value and more chaddams. If however, we switched the ratio of men and women refugees, pussy value would crash to the floor and men would be the ones with the upper hand, think of it as a reversed China

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger incels.co

[JFL] "Female Orgasm" is the reason why you're an incel

By Professor B. McGirlsex, PhD in INCELDOM (Cambridge, UK), M.B.B.S (Kings College, London, UK), BSc (Hons) (APNP)

The female orgasm is the most useless thing on the face of this earth - there is no reason for it to even exist.

* No reproductive function
* No anatomical function

Female orgasm is an evolutionary quirk and is just as useless as

* male nipples
* The appendix
* The tooth fairy
* Females in scientific fields

Foids want to LARP as men, the gender who can have an orgasm every single time they fuck.

Men can fuck a foid, fuck a fleshlight, fuck a mouth, fuck a palm(handjob) e.t.c and they cum every single time!

Meanwhile a foid can have sex for 10 years but not experience even a single orgasm. If nature wanted foids to cum it'll have made it easy for foids to orgasm - but no, its extremely difficult or even impossible for foids to reach "orgasm".

* Scientifically speaking - the only sure way for foids to orgasm is by getting brutally and savagely raped

Fuck these foid cunts - when they cant orgasm they blame men yet its their flawed biology to blame + they shouldnt be cuming in the first place!

Why the mythical non-existant foid orgasm is the reason why you are rotting in Inceldom

* The reason why foids forsake their biological imperative of mating with their looksmatch is because they chase useless things like "foid orgasm". In their warped minds goodlooking = chad = good sex = foid orgasm & ugly = incel = bad sex = no orgasm
* Countless studies and experiments and also a huge wealth of anecdotal evidence have shown that foids are ruthlessly selfish and self serving animals and only care about their pleasures - which is why they dont care that they are perpetuating inceldom at an ungodly rate and would rather chase after "orgasms" than settle for their looksmatch
* The Dogpill exists purely becase of the foids unnecessary need for orgasm. Thats why they choose a canine animal with a grotesque dick to fuck because it takes a lot to get a foid to orgasm. Dogpill almost accurately mimics and simulates rape which is why foids love the dog pill so much. The wild uncoordinated primal thrusts of a dog penis closely resembles those of a rapist thats why the dogpill is soooo appealing. In this futile search for orgasm foids bypass and over look a large number of males who inturn become incels.
* The cock carousel is very appealing to foids because they are forever chasing the elusive foid orgasm. They waste their youth and virginity whilst chasing muh orgasms and they disenfranchise their looksmatchs whilst in this trivial pursuit. These disenfranchised men become incels.

gloobalo #fundie reddit.com

Aren't fakecels just proof that it's over and more normies will join the sub when they see attractive males without girls

Seeing fakecels like dontcomplain1, gambler, zyrros, knaijjd, iamhopeless etc is just proof how hypergamy is out of control when they can't get laid.

It makes me question my existence how I can have a chance when they struggle so hard.

This is a brutal pill to swallow

I think more normies will wake up and swallow the blackpills that they have no chance and hypergamy is out of control

AnAverageJoe #racist stormfront.org

So you think we are crazy? READ THIS

So I was doing some reading not too long ago and decided this data may be useful. To anyone coming here believing we are crazy, racist, stupid, or just plain full of ****, please, read on. Read this post fully before you decide to reply calling me a racist or a hater. If you can't do this simple task, you are a hopeless libtard.


First off, let's talk briefly about our stance. Many here feel we as European descendants should have a land to ourselves. The Chinese have a land to themselves. The Japanese have a land to themselves. Even Africans have a land to themselves. What about us? There is not a single country on this planet where "white people" can be at peace without other races bothering them. Why is this? That's an advanced topic we would love to share but we don't want to waste our time telling it to someone who will ignore everything said. If you genuinely want to know, feel free to ask and someone will explain it further.

"But that's silly! First off there is only one race, the human race!" Wrong. Yes we all belong to the same species (this is debated). However we are not all alike or equal. There are essentially three groups (usually referred to as "races") within the human species. The Caucasoid (White Europeans basically), the Mongoloid (Asians basically), and the Negroid (Africans basically). Each has their own traits that are quite different from the others. It is well known but almost never said that the Negroids tend to have the lowest IQs (well below that of either Caucasoids or Mongoloids) while the Caucasoids and Mongoloids tend to have the highest (an average of only a few points difference between Mongoloids and Caucasoids). The Caucasoids also tend to be more creative than either the Mongoloid or Negroid. There is very specific physical characteristics between the "races". We are NOT all alike. This is a complex topic that we also would love to tell you about, but would rather not waste time with someone who will ignore everything said. If you genuinely want to know, feel free to ask and someone will explain it further.

"Among white Americans, the average IQ, as of a decade or so ago, was 103. Among Asian-Americans, it was 106. Among Latino Americans, it was 89. Among African-Americans, it was 85. Around the world, studies find the same general pattern: whites 100, East Asians 106, sub-Sarahan Africans 70. One IQ table shows 113 in Hong Kong, 110 in Japan, and 100 in Britain. White populations in Australia, Canada, Europe, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States score closer to one another than to the worldwide Negroid average. It's been that way for at least a century."

For the record, mine is 132 (I have taken several tests and the range is 130 to 145).

"Are Jews white?" Yes and no. They are a mixed breed (typically a mixture of Caucasoid and Negroid with some Mongoloid). Any Jew claiming to be white is (usually) a liar. The only white Jews are converts. Why bring this up? It will be covered later.

"Why are you always picking on black people?!" They are the worst of the human species and I can prove it. For one, all evidence suggests that the typical Negroid is pretty unintelligent. With an average IQ of around 80 to 85, their mental capacities are just not that good. If one takes time to observe the Negroid, they will find that the Negroid is rather aggressive and prone to violence. They also lack impulse control. These two traits lead to them being trouble for other races. Here's some stats:

The city of Irvine California is considered the safest large city in the USA as of 2014. With a violent crime rate of just 46 per 100,000, it is pretty dang safe. What is the racial makeup? White alone - 98,118 (42.7%), Asian alone - 92,820 (40.4%), Hispanic - 25,573 (11.1%), Negroid alone - 3,559 (1.5%). The city of Detroit Michigan is considered the most dangerous large city in the USA. With a violent crime rate of 2,072 per 100,000, it's a pretty dangerous city. What is the racial makeup? Negroid alone - 570,808 (81.4%), White alone - 57,252 (8.2%), Hispanic - 52,421 (7.5%), Asian alone - 7,569 (1.1%). Hmm. Interesting. Of course you can look at almost any big city in the USA and notice the SAME trend: The more Whites/Asians and less Negroids, the lower the violent crime rate. The more Negroids and less Whites/Asians, the higher the violent crime rate. It is clearly seen, can be clearly proven, and is repeatable. You can take any city of any size that is majority White, flood it with Negroids, and the violent crime rate will go up. Even if you take out the same number of whites as you put in Negroids. Negroids are not even safe from themselves. It is a fact that the majority of Negroids murdered are murdered by OTHER Negroids.

"Well, crime rate is proportionate to poverty! Race has nothing to do with it, just happens there are a lot of poverty stricken blacks in the USA because of discrimination!" Wrong. When one takes a close enough look at the data, there is more of a correlation between race and crime than poverty and crime. A poor white neighborhood is a lot safer than a poor Negroid neighborhood. As for discrimination, Negroids in the USA are given MORE opportunity than whites and yet they still fail horribly at life. Is it a coincidence or is it because they lack the mental capacity to do well with the opportunities they have? If you have ever worked as a manager, you will know exactly what I mean. You will know from experience that the typical Negroid lacks intelligence and motivation. They tend to be lazy, especially when out of the sight of the superiors. If they think they can get away with something, they will try to. No intelligent person can claim that Negroids are not given preferential treatment now days in the USA. Despite such, they have made no progress in life and generally mooch off others to some degree. Some of course take it all the way and live on government/charity handouts. Some actually try and find work but typically remain poor due to bad decisions due to lacking mental capacity. Have you ever had to give instructions to Negroids? If you have, you can tell how low their general mental capacity is. The purer the Negroid, the dumber and more violent they are.

"But white people commit violent crimes too!" Of course. All races have some representation in crime. I'm not arguing that. What I am arguing is how much. The statistics and data doesn't lie. When you factor in their percentage of the population, Negroids commit the most crimes, the most violent crimes, the most rapes, the most property damage, so on and so forth. They are generally the bottom of the barrel. If you need further proof, just look at the riots that's been going on. A white cop shoots a Negroid they thought was armed but turned out they were unarmed. So a lot of the local Negroids go out and destroy their city/town. Loot, pillage, burn. However they fail to realize that Negroid cops shoot unarmed white people just as often as white cops shoots unarmed Negroids. White cops kill more white people than Negroids. You don't see us rampaging like angry gorillas and destroying our towns. Why? We aren't that violent or stupid.

Now maybe you have a little bit of an idea WHY we want a place to ourselves.

"Why did you let all these non-whites into white majority countries if you didn't want them there?" Well, we didn't. This is where the Jewish issue comes in. Anyone who takes a decent time to research the history/connections/heritage/genetics of those in high places will come to the conclusion our country and much of the world is run by Jews. The most treasonous laws ever passed had Jewish backers and was funded by Jewish money. Any treasonous law has Jewish ties. Almost all corruption can be traced back to a Jew. The Jews own all the media, they own all the television stations, they own all the radio, they own all the newspapers, they own the government (through bribes, blackmail, campaign funding, etc), they control what the majority sees. Why does it matter? The Jews have a mostly unspoken bond. Whether they are "practicing" Jews or not, they are all bound by blood (genetics) and they know it. A Jew will "scratch the back" of another Jew any chance they get. Openly they claim otherwise but the data doesn't lie. Spend any decent time researching and you will find a Jew connected to everything that is bad with the world today.

"You are beginning to sound like a Nazi! Aren't you ashamed that the Germans killed 6 million Jews?!" There is no solid evidence showing Hitler had any intention of killing ANY Jews, much less 6 million or any other figure. In fact, the Nazis severely punished other Nazis if they hurt captive Jews. Bet you never heard that one. As well, there is no evidence there were any homicidal gas chambers. In fact, the logistics of "gassing and cremating" six million Jews during the time Hitler reigned is impossible. Even modern cremation ovens can barely do 19 bodies a day (24 hours). Plus you have the issue with fuel (cremation takes a lot of fuel) and the remains left after cremation. Where did all those ashes go? "Nobody knows". The evidence does not support the claims for the Holocaust. Any intelligent and reasonable human being would consider evidence over rumor every time. Concerning the so called eye witnesses, any prosecutor will tell you that eyewitness testimony is some of the worst evidence. The mind loves to embellish and exaggerate memories. The mind is also not a perfect storage device. It may remember some basic things about an event but it almost never can remember details. Were there cremation ovens at the "camps"? Of course. People die. What do you do with the bodies of those who die? You can either bury them or cremate them. Cremation has advantages. In any group setting (such as labor camps), if you don't take care of the dead quickly, it can lead to issues for everyone in the group. The evidence supports that the camps were labor camps and typically had a range of pleasure activities for camp members to participate in. There were things like swimming pools, pianos, musical instruments, games, movies, so on and so forth. Bet the Jewish run media never told you about how many times Hitler tried to prevent war. Hitler tried numerous times to prevent war. The Jews pushed for it and pushed for it until they had it. Hitler of course made them regret it. Hitler could have won the war but he made some mistakes. That is not the point of this post though so you can look elsewhere for the data related to Hitler.

"If white people are so smart, why did they let the Jews outsmart them?" The Jews didn't outsmart our people. What they did do however is manipulate one of our weaknesses: compassion and kindness. Look at most Christians for example. Always giving to the poor, feeling pity for those less fortunate. These traits are common among our people. We also tend to be too trusting. We made the mistake of letting Jews reside among us because they looked similar to us and on the outside appeared nice. Little did we know how mean, sneaky, and manipulative they generally are. Are all Jews bad? Of course not, but most are. That is the main reason Jews even to this day screw us over. They use our weaknesses to manipulate us and they have nearly perfected how to brainwash us. This is why you should throw out your television (I did over a decade ago and it was one of the best decisions I've ever made).

"You seem to try to use logic, but what about all the Christians on your board?!" To each his own. We are not a unified body of "haters". Each of us has our own beliefs. I personally am not religious. Do I hate Christians? No. Could I ever be a Christian? Unlikely. I personally require proof and evidence and I just haven't found that in religion of any sort. Do I know what exists after death? Nope. Am I worried? Not really. Each of us is different but we are unified on some topics (such as wanting a territory of our own where we can live in peace among our own kind).

"What about homosexuals?" What about them? The evidence supports that homosexuals have a mental disorder. For a long time homosexuality was considered a mental disorder. However with time society lost their minds and began embracing people with serious and dangerous mental disorders. I will not delve into this too deeply here but being a homosexual puts you at a MUCH higher risk than the general public for dying at an early age. You as a homosexual have a MUCH higher risk of contracting an STD/STI. Statistics show as well that homosexuals are far more likely than heterosexuals to molest children. There are logical reasons to oppose the homosexual agenda. Are all homosexuals bad? Of course not. However I wouldn't want one living next door to me. The religious among us tend to point to their holy book when asked about homosexuals. I point to facts and statistics. Either way, homosexuality is a choice, is a mental disorder, and can be cured.

"Ok, so you don't like Jews, Negroids, or homosexuals, do you like anything?" Of course. We love our people and our heritage. Society (with the brainwashing from the Jew) is pressuring us to forget our heritage or even be ashamed of it. What is there to be ashamed of? If it weren't for our people, you all would still be living in huts/caves/tents. You wouldn't be typing on a computer because they wouldn't exist. You would be sweating like mad because there would be no air conditioning. You would be bored out of your mind as there would be no internet or even electricity. You would very likely live in a dangerous time with nothing better to do than try to survive. If it weren't for our ancestors, you would be living like the primitive tribes in Africa right now. Consider that next time you think about feeling ashamed about being white or the next time you try to make one of us feel ashamed. Our people brought civilization to the world. Wherever we are in high numbers, there is low crime, high civilization, and progress in the area of technology. Where we are low in numbers, there is rampant crime, no progress, and primitive tribal like gangs roaming around. I will never be ashamed of being white and I will never apologize.

various incels #sexist reddit.com

Womanlet transitions to male and becomes a 4'11 hypermanlet, now is depressed that no woman wants to date her JFL

image

(Flipcel)
OH NO NO NO NO HAHAHAHAHAHA she literally had everything in the world. Now she's just a fucking manlet not even 1/10 fems will accept. But hey, height don't matter right IT? It's probably because she's a misogynist that's why she's an inkcyl JFL Christ why didn't 'he' just lesbianmax in the first place.

(Ononox)
Lol when women transition to men they probably imagine they will be these bad boy Chads strong, masculine and hot. Turns out they just become ugly bald manlets with weak frames for the most part. It must be brutal though.

(Kalsbsk76)
They experience the blackpill first hand. Fantastic. I bet she transitioned back to female after swallowing the blackpill, easy life again.

(JucheforWhitePeople)
To top things off, they'll also have feminists (including MtF trannies) telling them that they have male privilege.

(justforlulzandkeks)
HAHAHAHAH

i absolutely adore the irony in woke leftists eating and contradicting themselves, it's legit hilarious to watch

(ICQME)
Looks will get you dates and personality will help keep them. Trans-men usually act too passive and submissive when dating or they put on a hyper masc front which just comes off as being an insecure jerk. Trans men lack the masculine energy most women want even if they look decently masculine enough to play the role. IT'S OVER FOR TRANSMASC'CELS

What's funny is the incel site incelistan(lgbt incels) is dominated by FTM trannys.

Not surprised. They don't realize the extent of female privledge until it's too late. Women often believe the life of men is ease and privledge in both dating and professional worlds simply because they're men. Some females do realize their privledge and will never admit it which is why most afab 'trans' will do the non-binary/gender fluid/they-them thing.

(imadethistoshitpostt)
Transmen have to be incel's greatest allies.

I can't even imagine going from occasionally having guys ask you out to invisible man mode, zero interest no matter how hard you try for the rest of your life.

(justforlulzandkeks)

It's no wonder 99% of trannies are male to female, because they realized women live life on tutorial mode.

lmao, 99% of trannies are autistic males that will never pass as a female, so much for their tutorial mode

(EATravelGuy)
The fact is the majority, if I am not mistaken over 80%, of transgenders are male to female. It's a hyperbole but we could say society knows how screwed it is to be a male and consequently fewer are opting to become one.

Also most female to male transitions still look noticeably female (short hair doesn't turn you into a dude) and most women aren't lesbians.

(flamethrowup)
Wow, even a former woman has to admit the blackpill when forced to experience it firsthand. Reminds me of that woman who transitioned to a black man and found himself suddenly being harassed by cops—both this and OP are such obviously bad ideas that there's no rational justification for them. It's almost hilarious they thought doing this would make them happier.

Edmund_Kemper #sexist incels.co

[Serious] every foid with a chad brother is having sex with her brother

i know this for sure. foids will have sex with any chad and if her brother is a chad, she's definitely having sex with him. if her dad is a chad she'd have sex with her dad too. if foids are crazy enough to fuck a dog, they're crazy enough to fuck their chad brother or chad dad.

and no i am NOT trolling or baiting. i'm serious. think about it. if you're gonna fuck dogs, you prolly fucked your chad brother

ViralCel #sexist #racist #psycho incels.co

Magicels: The Blackpilling (CARDCELS GTFIH)

Hello there and welcome to my card making cope thread. Will update when I have more ideas, open to feedback and suggestions.

Inspired by Bufophiliac og post:
image

Transcript(several spoof Magic The Gathering cards:
“Balding Indian Janitor” - 1 Any, 1 Green - Creature - Subhuman Incel - Misogyny 2 (Whenever this creature blocks or becomes blocked by a Foid, this creature gets +2/+2 until end of turn) - “Show bobs and vagene.” - 2/2
“St. BlackOps2Cel” - 2 White, 1 Any - Creature - Subhuman Incel - Indestructible; Other Subhumans get +1/+1 and have protections from Foids, Normies, and Cucks. - “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.” - 1/1
-“The Supreme Gentleman” - 1 White, 1 Red - Land Creature – Subhuman Incel - Misogyny 3; Whenever a Foid enters the battlefield, put a Rejection counter on The Supreme Gentleman; 1 Red, 1 White, Tap, Remove three Rejection counters from The Supreme Gentleman and sacrifice him: Destroyup to five target creatures. - “I don’t know what your problem is, girls.”
“Slaying Queen” - 2 Black, 2 Any - Creature - Human Foid - Whenever Slaying Queen blocks or gets blocked by a Chad or Tyrone, exile that creature and place a black 1⁄1 Spawn creature onto the battlefield - Someone gotta take responsibility for these kids” - ⅔
“The Rope” - 3 Any - Artifact - 1 Any, Tap, sacrifice a subhuman: You draw two cards and gain 5 life. “The ultimate cope, and our only hope. A permanent solution to a permanent problem”
“Gymcel Manlet” - 2 White, 3 Any - Creature – Subhuman Incel - Overcompensate - 1 White, 3 Any (1 White 3 Any: This creature becomes a Human Nomrie until end of turn.); Whenever Gymcel Manlet overcompensates, put a +1/+1 counter on Gymcel Manlet. - ¾
“Nerdy Guy” - 3 Any 2 Blue - Creature - Human Chad - When Nerdy Guy enters the battlefield, gain control of target foid. - “Silly Incels, you know noting about women. Just look at my boyfriend, he’s a total nerd!! Tee-hee!”
“Surgerymaxxing Hopefuls” 1 Red, 3 Fire - Creature - Subhuman Incel - Overcompensate - 1 Red 1 Any; Whenever Surgerymaxxing Hopefuls overcompensates, flip a coin. If you win the filp. put a +1/+1 counter on Surgerymaxxing Hopefuls, otherwise remove a +1/+1 counter from Surgerymaxxing Hopefuls. Then, if Surgerymaxxing Hopefulls has three or more +1/+1 counters on it, sacrifice Surgerymaxxing Hopefuls and put two 5⁄5 white Human Chad creature tokens onto the battlefield. - 2⁄2.
“Tinder” - 3 Any 3 Red - Enchantment - All Foids get +2/+2.; Subhumans cannot attack or block, and their activated abilities cannot be played. - “It’s Over”
“Soy Boy” - 2 Any 1 Green- Creature . Human Cuck - Male Feminist (Preven all damage this creature woould deal to Foids.). “I would appreciate if you left me and my wife’s son alone.”

Latest expansion:
imageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimage

Transcript”NEET Squad” - 7 Any - Creature - Human Incel - This spell costs 1 Mana less to cast for each Normie or Cuck on the battlefield. NEET Squad’s power and toughness are each equal to the number of untapped Incels you control. - “Can’t beat the NEET.” - */*.
“NPC” - 1 Any - Creature - Human Normie - NPC can’t attack or block alone. NPC gets +1/+1 for each other creature in play named NPC. - “if (offended=true) say “normie platitudes”;” - 1⁄1.
“The Blackpill” - 3 Any 3 Black - Legendary Enchantment - The Blackpill can’t be countered. All Humans you control are now Incels in addition to their other subtypes. All Incels in your control get +2/+2 and gain vigilance. - “It never began.”
“Juggernaut Law” - 2 Any 3 Black or Red - Enchantment - All Foid creatures with power 4 or less have haste. All Foid creatures with power 3 or less have trample. All Foid creatures with power 2 or less can’t be blocked. - “You can’t keep a woman’s dating potential down. She is unstoppable. Any flaws she has, just make her stronger.”
“Lay Down And Rot” - 2 Any 1 Black - Sorcery - Target creature gets -3/-3 until end of turn. Put a -1/-1 counter on it. - “Tour’s over boyo, time to ldar.”
“Wagecuck” - 2 Any 2 Green - Creature - Human Normie - Tap. Put a -1/-1 counter on this creature and put 1 Mana in your Mana pool. It becomes a Cuck until the end of yor turn. Tap: Remove a -1/-1 counter from this creature and draw a card. - “W- Would you like fries with that, sir?” - 4⁄2
“Fakeup” - 1 Red 1 Green - Target Foid gets +5/+0 and gains haste until end of turn. - “I don’t wear makeup for men, I do it for myself.
“Trucel” - 2 Any 1 Blue 1 White - Creature - Subhuman Incel - Defender; Return any Foid that would fight this creature to its owner’s hand instead. - “Be honest guys, is it over for me?” - 0⁄10
“Betabuxxer” - 2 Any 1 White 1 Blue - Creature - Human Cuck - Tap: The next Foid spell you cast this turn costs 2 Mana less to cast. Male Feminist - “Happy wife happy life!”
“Online Dating Service” - 1 Any 1 Red 1 Black - Artifact - 1 Mana, Tap: Reveal the top card of your library. If it’s a Chad card, put the card into your hand. If it’s a Human card, you may put that card into your hand. If it’s a Subhuman card, exile it. - “Just put yourself out there, bro!”

Various incels #sexist reddit.com

Having to pretend to have sympathy for foods is exhausting

Swalla365: I hate having to pretend i have even the slightest shred of sympathy for foids whenever I’m around people. Typically at work. We’re allowed to listen to the radio at my office on Fridays and this news story came up about this foid that got raped and killed. This then became the talking point in the office about how “terrible” it is that some men do that to women. And of course I had to agree and pretend I had sympathy for the victim when inside I really didn’t give a shit about the victim or have any sympathy for her. As far as I was concerned she got what she deserved. A couple of months ago a co worker was telling about how he knows two women that got raped, and for one of them it was so bad that she can’t have kids anymore. Once again I had to act like it was so terrible and I had sympathy for both of them, when in fact I was thinking they can get raped again for all I care. The fact that I can pull it off and convince people I have sympathy for these foids is pretty impressive.

It’s weird how we’re expected to have sympathy for foids and yet they aren’t expected to have sympathy for us. They constantly tell us it’s our fault and our problem that we can’t get paid, so why can’t we openly say similar things about them when they have issues. This is why I hate being around people

incelthrow1222: There's no such thing as "rape". For foids, "rape" is just getting fucked by a sub-8 male and regretting it afterwards.

excesscel: It is very hard to have sympathy for foids after everything that has happened. It's like asking Jews to have sympathy for Hitler.

VoluntarilyStronger: was going to say this is a bit exaggerated but then i remembered JBW

excesscel: Yep, the racism us ethnics face at the hands of foids is very real.

sliske , blackblade,puck #fundie mmo-champion.com


Judge grants convicted pedophile ex-husband sole custody of his daughter

Feel free to question why this Judge is still in the job
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti....html#comments
http://kfor.com/2013/06/25/convicted...-old-daughter/
http://www.klewtv.com/news/national/...?tab=video&c=y

Ms Coomer pointed out that because Elizondo is a registered sex offender, he will be unable to carry out many parental duties
'He can`t take her to Chuck E. Cheese. He can`t take her to a park,' she said. 'He can`t go to her school. He`s not allowed in school.'

The thought of this child being stuck in the house with him is truly frightening. But it does beg the question how bad is the mother?? the article sort of eludes to the reason why the judge awarded the father sole custody but their HAS TO BE more to the story.to the reason why the judge awarded the father sole custody but their HAS TO BE more to the story.

(sliske)

Well if you look at it logically then any gay brother you have or even any straight sister mum or dad could be frightening too. I'm a straight guy who likes older women, i don't think my mum feels in danger of me suddenly raping her or even hinting that i fancy her for multiple reasons

1. I don't
2. Pedophile / Bisexual / Homosexual / Whateversexual doesn't equal automatic incest condoning.

Not to be a pedophile sympathizer but at the end of the day they're just people who are attracted to a certain thing purely because of the way their body developed. They shouldn't be treated as incestious just for that reason alone.

Edit: of course if you do the actual act of having sex with a minor its still a pretty horrible thing, but being a pedophile in itself shouldn't automatically make you a lesser human being in regards to your children.

There's a pretty big difference there. He was convicted of molesting a 6 year old, he specifically targeted a helpless victim. If your gay brother was raping men, you bet your ass you'd be afraid of him.

I wouldn't. I don't assume rapist = incest condoning
What i'm saying is just because he molested someone, doesn't mean his standards are completely gone. For example i rape Cheryl Cole, that doesn't mean i'm going to go and rape an old man too.
And I think it's a far cry more likely that a person who molests a child is likely to do so again even if the child is related to them.

I wasn't wieghing it i was just using it as an example in itself. But thats not the point. The guy on the previous page said it better than i could. I'm terrible at explaining my point. In a nut shell i don't believe that being a child molester makes you have no bounderies. I believe even a rapist has standards or even a child molester has standards. I don't believe he would do that to his family


(blackblade)
Even criminals have rights, people.

Yeah, he's done some terrible shit. That doesn't give you the right to shit on him, nor deny him his family. If he was dangerous, he'd still be in jail.

This is simply a trick by the media to generate hits. Unless he's had a history of molesting his own children, it's a non-issue.

(puck)
I don't see the problem. Pedophile does not mean he would be prone to a relationship with his own daughter

j-curl #fundie imdb.com

[OT: Why any man would want to get married these days is baffling!]

Marriages commonly end in divorce, and women initiate the divorce ~75% of the time. Women nearly always end up owning things after a divorce which they didn't pay for (i.e., legalized theft), in some cases, even things which were owned by the man prior to even marrying the woman (and not just minor things either, it could be a house, which is usually a person's most valuable possession). And, if there are children, women are usually awarded custody, and men are "awarded" child support payments, despite there being no mechanism in place to ensure the money is spent on the kids, and despite the father no longer having any real say in how the kids are raised. On top of that, you could even end up paying alimony (more legalized theft).

Then there are other bizarre possibilities, such as having to pay child support for a kid or kids that aren't even yours.

Marriage is an extremely risky gamble; one which can cost you hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars and your kids if you lose, and which has no payoff if you "win" (other than getting to keep what you already have).

Marriage made sense at one time, but with the way things are now, I wouldn't even consider it. And there is nothing you can do that is guaranteed to protect yourself either, because there really is no such thing as an "ironclad" prenuptial agreement.

Alex Stepford #sexist thatstepfordgal.com

Some of you may know (or not know), I grew up from my teens with a single father.

Am I a hypocrite?

In fact, I don’t think so. With my circumstances, it was definitely not possible for my parents to stay together, this has only supported my contention in the fact that single parenting does not only present more complications for the parent but also for the child’s development. It is true, since I’ve been there and my sibling’s been there, they still are there while I am much older.

Single parenting as an experience varies depending on whether the single parent is the mother or the father and both have big cons, not just single mother parenting. I can say that I definitely experienced a minimal effect from the cons since I was already quite old by the time my parents divorced, I was in my late teens so my parents were married for most of my childhood. Additionally, I also had my grandmother to turn to when they separated, we have always been quite close and in a way- she bridged the gap that a mother was in my life pretty well. This is why I am like this now.

However, it is not all smooth sailing, as I will explain now.

Single Mothers

Single mothers love with a nurturing kind of love that is accepting, gentle and they are always wanting to protect in a feminine way. Of course, being women, single mothers can teach the importance of emotions, expressing oneself, understanding others and being more empathetic to their children, which is very useful.

Con: Single mothers cannot teach children, especially male children, the importance of masculine responsibility completely since she is not a male role model. Especially by example. In fact, they turn the whole idea on its head. Male children see their mothers doing all the providing and being a male themselves, they don’t associate providing with manhood. The way mothers protect is also different so male children don’t have any actual examples of bravado or even an actual male role model who has masculine hobbies. The biggest con of all is that they also become too emotionally sensitive, since while they learn such a good thing from their mother, they cannot balance it with a masculine stoicism and bravado that they would learn from a father for father figure. I find a lot of whiny, feminist men are raised by single mothers, many of whom have their natural masculinity actually being suppressed by their single mothers (who are bitter towards men)!

Single Fathers

When it comes single fathers, you can definitely rely on them to provide and protect while also teaching you to be tough and resilient against the world the way a man can. Something I learned was how to bare the brunt and not complain. Also, being more direct and less sensitive, fathers can teach their children to be more blunt when it comes to expressing themselves, with less regard for emotion. Which is good if you want to be assertive.

Con: Children raised by single fathers, especially female children often find that they may be too emotionally hardened or blunt, to the point that when they do interact with boys (especially in teenage years) and people in general they are too blunt or even offensive. This makes them hard to approach by some, I went through this myself! Also, often these female children do go through a tomboy phase since all you have as a visual role model through those years is dad and his t-shirts and pants. The biggest con of all is the hindrance in being able to express their emotions to others, as I see with my sibling and I went through it too, though to a smaller degree (I was helped by my grandmother, though). They find it hard to talk about their feelings and be open to romantic love or to be more receptive and just listening to people. I don’t know many children raised by single fathers, just one other person besides my sibling and I, so I can’t make a general judgement on the ‘type’ of person they tend to become. It’s just a smaller pool of people.

This is why I truly believe in having two loving parents within the family to raise their children. Yes I may be traditional, I believe women should be at home as carers for their children and the house and men to be at work to provide and protect. In this way though, they are still able to teach children in two different ways. Mothers teach by caring and through their emotional skills while fathers teach by example, children see where their father goes and what he does to provide and how he takes responsibility- they can also both teach by actually discussing and passing on wisdom.

One thing I will add: a single father will have a harder time in society. Since they are less common in number, especially with the ostracisation men face nowadays, they are unlikely to receive sympathy and help from general society. People will always respond to single dads with surprise. People will always ask where mum is, much more often than the other way around. You know what really sucks? That my father always gets questioned whenever he travels with my sibling about his travel custody papers and a letter within it from my mother confirming his custody. Because..dad is probably kidnapping the little child or something if he is by himself.

It’s never the other way around.

vodkacel #sexist incels.co

[SuicideFuel] ascenscion is impossible

Many, if not all, here want to ascend.

By ascension, I mean finding a girl who truly loves you and will not cheat
Most guys will not care about her money status, ethnicity, social status, education, etc. As long she is faithful.

The criteria is DAMN simple. Yet...

THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE, if you are below 8 / 10. Simply as that. NO foid will lust or truly love you if you are below 8 / 10, and decide to remain faithful for the rest of her life in marriage (even then not guaranteed).

It does not matter:
if you are rich (unless you can surgery maxx)
have social status
have good personality (JFL at those who think that)
It does not matter if the foid:
poor or rich
educated or not
kind or not
Slav, Curry, African or Rice
Lust = biological instinct, that only depends on how you look.
JFL, if you think that there is 1 in 1 million special girl who will love you. Or that this time she will say yes, after you have approached other 100 foids.

Beta $$$ is NOT ascension. It is basically agreeing on letting a parasite inside your life and resources.
Prostitution is NOT ascension. That slut would never give you a chance, if you had no $$$.
3rd world country bride is NOT ascension = prostitution with extra steps

As a low SMV man, you cannot ascend. You can either embrace the harsh reality or live in illusion.

Sadness #sexist incels.co

[Venting] Small talk is blackpilling the shit out of me

I've recently been trying to get more extroverted since my loneliness is mentally torturing me at this point. I think I've become pretty well-versed in the art of interacting and small talk with certain types of people (strangers in public, male employees, classmates, acquaintaces). Older adults are always friendly; but for people my age, it depends.

Other incels (including soyboys) are the easiest to talk to since they, like me, are also desperate to not be treated like garbage.
Normies are usually receptive, especially if they're alone or in small groups.
Chads will only be receptive if they're employees or if they're alone. If they're in groups, they won't be as rude as foids, but they still don't want to be associated with a subhuman nerd. They'll usually give a quick smile-and-nod response and mingle with someone else.

But then there's femoids :feelscry:. This is where it truly hurts. Sometimes, after continued success in riffing with other dudes, I forget that I'm a hideous subhuman and try to make conversation with a girl. I then get a harsh dose of reality when I see them disinterestedly utter a one-word response and not even look at me; or at worst, give me a dirty look. If they're employees, they'll manage to put on a forced smile but make me take the hint.

It's humiliating :feelscry:. Each time I briefly wonder "Was it something I said?" then I realize "Oh yeah, I forgot I was ugly."

Sadness #sexist incels.co

{Submitter‘s note: This is an older thread I stumbled across today and I had to submit it for the hilarious gender mix up}

[RageFuel] FSTDT.com (CuckTears-lite) proves the black pill while attacking my thread

It was my thread about making small-talk.

SpoilerI've recently been trying to get more extroverted since my loneliness is mentally torturing me at this point. I think I've become pretty well-versed in the art of interacting and small talk with certain types of people (strangers in public, male employees, classmates, acquaintaces). Older adults are always friendly; but for people my age, it depends.
Other incels (including soyboys) are the easiest to talk to since they, like me, are also desperate to not be treated like garbage.
Normies are usually receptive, especially if they're alone or in small groups.
Chads will only be receptive if they're employees or if they're alone. If they're in groups, they won't be as rude as foids, but they still don't want to be associated with a subhuman nerd. They'll usually give a quick smile-and-nod response and mingle with someone else.
But then there's femoids :feelscry:. This is where it truly hurts. Sometimes, after continued success in riffing with other dudes, I forget that I'm a hideous subhuman and try to make conversation with a girl. I then get a harsh dose of reality when I see them disinterestedly utter a one-word response and not even look at me; or at worst, give me a dirty look. If they're employees, they'll manage to put on a forced smile but make me take the hint.

It's humiliating :feelscry:. Each time I briefly wonder "Was it something I said?" then I realize "Oh yeah, I forgot I was ugly."

I guess trying to have some sort of interaction with holes as a sub5 is a crime against humanity to them, so they decided to copypaste my thread onto their site and mock me for it.

Some stupid bitch's snide comment and her beta orbiter's response:

#2187759
Niam

You're damn right I don't want to be associated with a fucking incel. If I get the feeling a guy is some loser who shrieks about FFFFFFFOIDS online I'll try and make interacting as difficult as possible. Some may call this bullying.

Me, I call this preemptive measures.


#2187973
The Crimson Ghost

@ Niam- and your good work does not go unappreciated.

Hmm, so you intentionally act like a cunt to any guy who you think might be "some loser"? What exactly about random stranger would arouse that kind of suspicion?

{thinking Pepe emojis}

(being ugly)


Holes are disgusting vile creatures.

Unnamed couple #fundie vancouversun.com

B.C. couple loses child custody after stuffed lion purportedly transmitting the word of God acted as their lawyer

A B.C. couple whose religious views are too extreme even for churches and pastors and put them at odds with family, doctors, social workers and anyone else trying to help them with their daughter, have lost their battle for custody of her.

The unusual child custody trial featured the couple speaking in tongues to a stuffed animal they said transmitted the word of God directly to them and refusing legal assistance because Jesus Christ — through the stuffed lion — was their lawyer, witness and judge.

In November, when the girl was one, the Provincial Court of British Columbia formally declared she was in need of protection and placed her in provincial custody, a decision the parents appealed to the B.C. Supreme Court. The parents claimed the judge violated their Charter rights, discriminated against them as Christians and made procedural errors.

...

“It appears that, due to their strong religious beliefs, they are intolerant of those who do not espouse identical views. This includes other Christians,” Justice Diane MacDonald wrote in her ruling, released this week.

After the woman found she was pregnant, she told a social worker her husband sometimes choked her to make her stop crying, had once tied her hands and covered her mouth with tape, which scared her, and occasionally beat her, court heard.

She told the worker her husband grew up in a cult and believes sexual relations between children should be encouraged and that they “role-play” sins where she plays the victim and he plays the perpetrator, court heard.

...

After the birth of their daughter, the parents refused all medical tests and procedures for her, including a hearing test, blood test, eye drops and a vitamin K shot. The mother also said she was unwilling to have her vaccinated.

Because of concerns over family violence and mental health, the ministry monitored the family. The couple refused to have parental capacity assessments, despite a court order.

A month after the girl’s birth, she was removed from the home and the parents continued to have supervised access.

The mother applied to change her daughter’s name to Jesus JoyoftheLord and her own first name to Risen Lord Jesus, her middle name to Refinersfire and her last name to Christ (with a hyphenation including her real name.)

When their child custody case came to court, the couple refused legal aid.

They said they had legal help, however, which came in the formed of a stuffed lion. During trial, the couple spoke to the lion in non-discernible words, presented as “speaking in tongues,” and said that through the lion they heard directly from God.

They said Jesus Christ was their “lawyer, witness and judge.”

When they cross-examined witnesses, they told each witness that their lawyer Jesus was asking the questions through them.

In the end, the judge did not find them to be credible and ruled in favour of the ministry and placed the baby in continuing care. The parents appealed that decision, claiming it infringed on their religious freedoms “as Christian parents.”

Of Manlets and Men #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Foids are Chadpolitical

All talk about "liberal" women or "conservative" women is pointless because foids will always adapt themselves to the politics of the Chad they're chasing at the moment. Tinder experiments have shown time and again that no matter how "progressive" or "woke" a foid claims to be, she'll never reject a conservative Chad for his politics and will happily [Teehee] at his alt-right witticisms. It goes the same the other way too - a tradthot who is worshipped by NAWALT copers will happily throw her right-wing politics aside for a left-wing Chad.

It's all about looks. Foids are gleeful when they encounter an ugly guy with opposing political views because they can claim they rejected him for his "wrong" beliefs when they really rejected him for his looks. Their mysteriously positive reaction to a Chad with the same "wrong" beliefs will expose the truth.

Foids are not "liberal" or "conservative," they are Chadpolitical.

ItheIthe #sexist reddit.com

Once you fully understand and believe the fact that all women are degenerate sluts who don't care about you or any man for that matter, and that your only hope is betacux, anxiety goes away.

I'm not saying this will cure anxiety 100%. But I used to be an EXTREMELY anxious person, and I've swallowed so many blackpills that I simply don't give a shit and say whatever I want. Blackpills have actually improved my social skills.

Questioner #racist realjewnews.com

Down South, there are some nasty little varmints called “fire ants.”

In the West, their are some nasty little devils called “Jews.”

They (fire ants) exist in large numbers, and if you happen to step into their territory, they climb onto you in large numbers, and stealthily occupy your body surface from toe to head.

They (Jews) also exist in large numbers, and as they stepped into OUR territories (we allowed them, their so called Diaspora), they climb into every crevice of power they can occupy… economic, legal, political, and executive.

You (most people) do not feel them as they do this. Somehow, you are unaware of your risk. You can say that for both fire ants, and Jews.

Then, one of them causes you to feel it’s presence… and you instinctively slap it (usually on your neck). I mean… fire ants.

Or, one of their crimes gets you angry, and you instinctively speak out. About the Jew’s criminality, I mean.

Instantly, as you kill the one, a signal is immediately sent to the other thousands, even the ones that worked their way into your socks. You are now being simultaneously bitten (stung) by the hordes. Again, I mean fire ants.

Your entire body is on fire, and you can even die (rare, but it happens).

Or, instantly as you denounce the Jew properly, the other hordes of Jews instantly attack you in numerous ways… slander, boycott, physical attack, or even murder. They call it “The Law of the Rodef”. Whatever it takes, up to death, to stop one who stands in their way.

A strategy that clearly works with fire ants is — avoid their attacks by taking the offensive, find their nests, and destroy it and them.

As to our status under Jewish domination, we are in effect working as their attack arm militarily, while being milked of wealth in our daily lives. Milked dry, I might add.

We are currently (Christians in the West) serving the beast by fighting Jewish Wars against the Muslims. The Jews are, unfortunately, now preparing similar treatment to the Orthodox Slavs & Catholic Europeans.

The first self-declared enemy of Jewish history was the Egyptians. In modern day terms, these are represented as Arabs and Sunni Muslims. Jews have slaughtered these for over a generation, with their repeated and carefully timed assaults.

Their next most hated self-declared enemy were the Persians (Iranians). In modern day terms, these are represented as Shia Muslims. Same as above, with the biggest slaughter of all coming in the impending attack on Iran.

Sometimes, they gleefully watch (and sometime arrange) for the Muslims to slaughter each other (Iran-Iraq War, or coalition against Saddam in 1991).

They hate Romans (Europeans), mostly because of Vespasian & Titus, and the later failed Bar Kokhba rebellion. But they need the European wealth and blood, so they for now, are simply infiltrated.

They hate Germans (Nordics) because of Hitler, who saw them for what they are. This irrational hatred (they imitated much German culture and strategic thinking) is compounded because they (Jews) know their Holy-Hoax is a lie meant to subjugate this people for all time, and some Germans still dare to deny the lie.

Liars are always most infuriated by the one who knows of their deceit.

Of course they hate Christians everywhere, with a passion that out-burns the fires of Hell, because of the Jesus Christ that they would gladly stone or crucify even today. Luckily, that fire awaits them below.

They hate Slavs, for the Eastern Vikings that became today’s Russia and Ukraine destroyed their Khazar Kingdom long ago. As some Jews extent are descendants of the Khazars, this rankles beyond reason.

They showed that hatred for Slavs once before (1917-on) in terrifying action: a Jew fired bullet to the neck of an Orthodox priest at Lyubianka prison, or a Noble’s place unto death in the Jew run work-camps of Siberia, or Kaganovich’s Peasants’ starvation en masse in Ukraine and Russia in the 1930’s, or a machine gun bullet in the draftee’s back fired by a NKVD Jew commissar to keep the assault going.

Or, the crime that Jews most celebrated, the Jewish ordered murder and rape (yes, they raped the dead little girls) of the Czar and his family in Yekaterinburg. Subsequently named for their murderer, Sverdlov (a Jew).

Unfortunately, few know how to deal with fire ant risk.

More unfortunately, even fewer know anything about the Jewish threat.

The fire ant cannot be reasoned with. Neither can the Jew.

You cannot convert fire ants into honeybees. A few Jews do convert to Christianity, however. +BN is the shining example of our day. St. Paul was the fore-runner of such men, rare in history.

We can destroy fire ants, only if they have not already infiltrated our body.

We cannot destroy the Jewish masses, they have already infiltrated everything including our nostrils.

You cannot attempt to deport them to your neighbor’s territory. Hitler attempted that, and you see what happened.

No, a solution must be found, before a true world holocaust — and I don’t mean fire-ants.

Napoleon de Geso #sexist #psycho incels.co

Biggest reason to hate femoids is they are not expression of my dreams and high cultured desires, primitive biocunts of low value and high price

Them not giving sex is lesser reason, and just pretty foids to be hated for that, ugly ones be hated for being ugly, and in case of offering sex - hated for that too, that be disgusting and insulting
But even if sex, even if gf, even if not ugly, those creatures so shit, that even more hard to expect they could fulfill high cultured desire of having cute adorable and cultured waifu, not stupid slutty annoying disloyal cunt. Waifu comrade, who support me in my fights against humanimal degeneracies, not cunt who would say "man up", "find job", "find better job", all that social femoidistic shit, incompatible with my unearthy extradimentionalkin essence. In case of having waifu yes, finding job maybe good, but thats no way to measure me, that is not thing to require from me, and cunt doing this is just primitive piece of meat breeder who cares about stupid biological breeding and providing, fuck that shit, cultured waifu is for enlightenmnent together and not living for humanimal world
Maybe would fuck some pretty cunt right now, if possible, and hate them for not giving me that possibility, but biggest hate of femoids is because they failing to fit into my vision about cultured superior waifu. So sad to far away for me, but still is nice to think that one day improved waifus couldbe created, genetically engineered, or made in other ways, and this will be done to natural biocunts:
(Video: “Only in China - Pigs in China were burnt ALIVE due to Asfarviridae”)
Good morning, one more day without waifu of culture, I hate women

6SJ7, Diana in Wisconsin, Sir Francis Dashwood, & dschapin #fundie freerepublic.com

[A lesbian couple broke up after one of them, Lisa Miller, had become a born-again Christian and an "ex-homosexual." A Virginia court has now settled the custody battle by ordering that the child go to Janet Jenkins, Lisa's former lesbian partner. Lisa has, so far, refused to comply.]

6SJ7: The Underground Railroad is back in operation.

Diana in Wisconsin: I’m confused. The woman who gave birth to this child, renounced her homosexual ways, found God and doesn’t want her biological child to be around her ex-lesbian partner is the BAD GUY in this? (That’s the way the media is portraying it, IMHO). I know they both must be a little mentally ill, but shouldn’t we be rooting for the one who turned her life around? I mean, if we have to root for the lesser of two evils, then Miss Miller is the lesser of two evils. What am I missing? And why is this any different than say, a woman who later finds out her husband is gay and doesn’t want her children having anything to do with him? I mean, I don’t think homosexuals should marry, let alone reproduce in the first place, but we are where we are in society in this case, at least. *SHRUG*

Sir Francis Dashwood: The judge is a pedophile and should be hanged...

dschapin: This is not a normal contract case. It would be morally wrong for this mother to allow her daughter to be molested by her former lesbian partner. Would you subject the child to sexual abuse just to punish the biological mother for the bad decisions she made in the past - for which she has since repented?

Andrew Levinson #fundie returnofkings.com

Christians in general, and Catholics in particular, are portrayed as puritanical and anti-sex. This raises a question: if Catholics hate sex so much, then why did they historically tend to have so many children? As recently as 100 years ago, child rearing was considered the proper object of marriage and sex. The blue pill script – go to college, get a good salaried job, marry young and for life, have two or three kids – retains its staying power because it used to be sound advice. The manosphere exists in part because it is sound advice no longer.

Pope Paul VI, who reigned from 1963 to 1978, was in many ways a weak and vacillating man. His predecessor, Pope John XXIII, described then Cardinal Giovanni Battista Montini as, “our Hamlet,” always indecisive to the last. In an uncharacteristically bold move, he published the encyclical letter Humanae Vitae in 1968 that reaffirmed the Catholic Church’s opposition to all forms of artificial contraception.

At this point, many RoK readers may be thinking, “I’m sure this is terribly interesting to you Levinson, but I’m not a Catholic and the pill and the condom have been great for my sex life. Why should I care about this?” You should care because Paul VI called it: the easy availability of contraceptives paved the way for no-fault divorce, unleashed hypergamy, and sodomite “marriage.”

Marriage Then

Most of us take atomistic individualism for granted, in contrast to the ancient understanding of man as the political animal. “Who are you to say what two consenting adults can and cannot do in private?” is taken to be an unanswerable rejoinder to traditional understandings of sex and marriage. Sex seldom remains a purely private affair, especially in the era of social media. Among other things, sex can lead to love, marriage, hate, murder, children, disease, happy homes, broken homes, social cohesion and social disintegration.

As Pope Paul described it:

"Married love is also faithful and exclusive of all other, and this until death. This is how husband and wife understood it on the day on which, fully aware of what they were doing, they freely vowed themselves to one another in marriage. Though this fidelity of husband and wife sometimes presents difficulties, no one has the right to assert that it is impossible; it is, on the contrary, always honorable and meritorious. The example of countless married couples proves not only that fidelity is in accord with the nature of marriage, but also that it is the source of profound and enduring happiness."

In other words, marriage was once considered a more public institution than it is today, not through legislation but through social convention. Young men were incentivized to make themselves good husband material if they wanted sex and children. Young women were encouraged to remain chaste and marry young. Divorce was unthinkable for our great-grandparents. Then, as now, women were much more ruthless about slut shaming than men.

Above all, marriage was ordered toward children:

"Finally, this love is fecund. It is not confined wholly to the loving interchange of husband and wife; it also contrives to go beyond this to bring new life into being. “Marriage and conjugal love are by their nature ordained toward the procreation and education of children. Children are really the supreme gift of marriage and contribute in the highest degree to their parents’ welfare."

Marriage Now

In paragraph 17, Pope Paul predicts the consequences of the contraceptive mentality:

"Responsible men can become more deeply convinced of the truth of the doctrine laid down by the Church on this issue if they reflect on the consequences of methods and plans for artificial birth control. Let them first consider how easily this course of action could open wide the way for marital infidelity and a general lowering of moral standards. Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings—and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law [emphasis mine – AL], and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law. Another effect that gives cause for alarm is that a man who grows accustomed to the use of contraceptive methods may forget the reverence due to a woman, and, disregarding her physical and emotional equilibrium, reduce her to being a mere instrument for the satisfaction of his own desires, no longer considering her as his partner whom he should surround with care and affection."

Players and sluts ye shall always have with you, but the world now incentivizes us to be this way. Men must constantly perform or else their unhaaaappy wives will blow up the marriage for cash and prizes. That is, if men choose to marry at all. Fewer do, and in all honesty, I can hardly blame them. Why should they? If they want sex, they can find plenty of willing ladies provided they have even a modicum of game, and they won’t have to risk losing their homes, their jobs, their children, and their sanity in the divorce grinder.

Women too have grown to devalue men. Would the carousel exist to the extent that it does if it weren’t for the pill? If they can have consequence-free sex, then they will pursue the apex alphas and ditch the frustrated betas who were the good husbands and providers of yesteryear. Women are more exquisitely sensitive to social pressure than men, and the social cues that existed in our great-grandparents day aren’t there anymore.

The key here is that artificial contraception radically separated marriage and sex from child rearing. Marriage used to be a recognized public institution that carried with it certain legal and social obligations to which the couple was expected to conform. If children are removed from the occasion, then marriage becomes all about romantic feelings.

Fuzzy Feels Are Optional

If marriage is nothing but a public declaration of romantic feelings, then two consequences follow: if the feelings go away, that’s a legitimate reason to end the marriage; and if sodomites have romantic feelings for each other, then what reason do we have to exclude them from marriage?

Traditionally, Christianity has taught that if you burn with lust, you should marry. The specific woman you married was a question of prudence like choosing a career or a new house. Nowhere did the Church say that God had created “the one” or your soulmate. Unfortunately, this thinking has infiltrated all Christian churches today with disastrous consequences.

Jesus Christ famously prohibited divorce in the Gospels but many Christian churches have creative methods for getting around that. In theory, the Catholic Church has stood strong alone among all Christians. Strictly speaking, she does not recognize divorce but she makes “declarations of nullity,” which means a couple never formed a sacramental marriage at the time of their wedding vows. The American Catholic Church in particular has been handing out annulments like candy for fifty years, so it’s understandable why outsiders think of them as Catholic divorces.

The Basis Of Civilization

The building block of civilized society is not the individual but the family. The great evil of our time is that our progressive overlords actively undermine the family at every turn. My tradcon friends vacillate between believing game is either a placebo or a set of irresistible Jedi mind tricks cads use to deflower innocent virgins. The media wonders why young men refuse to grow up, man up, and marry those sluts. I say the men of today are responding rationally to the incentives of a world gone mad.

Be honest gentlemen: if Marriage 1.0 were still the rule instead of the exception, how many of you would happily marry? The contraceptive regime radically disrupted the natural formation of families. Sex became an end in itself. From that conviction came the scourge of pornography. The logical conclusion is the development of sex bots. And an elderly, celibate Italian bishop saw it all coming more clearly than all of the experts.

LeninistSkynet #sexist reddit.com

Women do not have a concept of objective truth. You cannot debate with women, you can only oppress them.

No matter how much proof you give to a female, she will always just listen to her cunt, will do what makes her loose cunt tingle, what allows her to ride the Chad carousel and what to virtue signal. That's it. That's why modern academia even condemns the whole concept of objective truth as an oppressive male invention.

But the opposite is the case: women can only oppress the truth. You can hand them as many blackpills as you like, you can proof to them that everything will go down the toilet if society continues on this gynocentric path, they will not be able to see it, as women do not have a concept of truth. And they do not care about the consequences of their actions anyway. They are controlled by their pussy and their emotions and that's it. There's nothing more bluepilled than the idea of blackpilling foids. You cannot convince them, you can only oppress them.

And feminized men are the same. Or at least they have to go to great lengths to rationalize the truth away if they want to remain in female-run spaces such as IT.

NotQuiteChadLite #fundie incels.co

MGTOW is like the edgy, sour-grapes attitude version of Incel

What I mean by this, is that incels are typically self deprecating, self aware of their situation, and not delusional when it comes to their fate. They know it’s over for the most part, and accept their fate as a low value male. Some try to cope with self improvement, or positive attitudes, but almost all of them accept on some level that very little positive female attention will come their way.

MGTOW is the polar opposite of this mindset. They’re still incels, or divorce raped boomer betabux, yet all of them think that they are the prize, and are dealing a serious blow to women by removing themselves from the dating market. They all imagine themselves to be debonair James Bond types, who voluntarily walked away from female attention, and now women suffer for it. The truth is all these men are not going their own way, they were sent their own way. “You can’t fire me, I quit!” basically.

MGTOWs cope by telling themselves that they are better and beyond women, that they don’t need them because they’re too-cool-for-school. MGTOWs act like they don’t need the one thing men were born to do, which is, be with women, sexually. They cope by posting pictures of food, alone. Going on trips, alone, or some other meaningless material possession that they cope with by telling themselves that having money is better than having a woman.

@JordanFirdBird2

imageEnjoying my Wendy’s in peace

Look at this Neckbeard-sent-his-own-way. He’s telling himself that his poverty fast food meal that he surely eats daily like the fat retard he is, is better than being with a woman. You can’t make this shit up.


@The-Thrillster

After 12hrs of grinding I'd expect a massive steak and an all night dick-sucking session.
Or, my favourite, just my peace and quiet.

“The-Thrillster” with the “peace and quiet” cope again, like not getting any pussy is somehow the greatest thing in the world because at least it means they can eat their microwave dinner in peace, with no woman to nag him.

Another man sent his own way. “Why do people think MGTOWS and incels are entitled again?”
Precisely because of garbage like this. He thinks that because he got up and went to work like normal people do everyday, a woman needs to be his personal sex slave and caretaker. This is exactly the sour grapes attitude I was talking about. “If I can’t have a woman be my personal chef and sex toy, I didn’t want her anyway!” Acting like he is so superior to everyone because he put in hours at work like most people everyday. The truth is if a woman even breathed in his direction , he would be the one cooking her dinner every night, he would become a slave to her for a chance of getting some pussy, even from a 3/10 landwhale. Calling MGTOWs delusional is an understatement.


Any MGTOWs reading this: stop pretending that you went your own way and voluntarily walked away from female affection. You’re just like us, low value males desperate for female validation, except you cope by telling yourself that you didn’t want them anyway, and it’s their loss now that you’re no longer available. Pretending you don’t want women and sex is like pretending you don’t want food, it is a biological instinct that cannot be overcome with shitty material possessions and pictures of sunsets and hiking trails. You all need to stop coping and just realize you were sent your own way just like us, and stop with your delusional edgy bullshit.

Henry Makow #conspiracy cruelhoax.ca

FEMINISM & HOMOSEXUALITY; HOW HETEROSEXUALITY WORKS

Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for women's rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are "socially constructed" to oppress them.

Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity, making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are being conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don't marry and have children. Thus courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

The Rockefellers and Rothschilds created feminism to weaken the family and poison male-female relations (divide and conquer.) Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God.

"Cruel Hoax" shows the connection between feminism, Communism and 9-11. It examines male-female relations and shows how we can take back our heterosexuality.

C0nserve #sexist reddit.com

Why rape "traumatizes" femoids.

Humans have no built-in way of rejecting sperm from their reproductive tracts.

Other animals, such as hens, can reject most or all of the sperm from an unwanted (read: low status) male. If they were taken and raped, it would be of no consequence to them as their body has natural mechanisms to remove/deactivate sperm.

Humans don't. Therefore, rape is of a greater consequence to them since they must carry a child from a low status male to term.

This is also why they are all abortion/free birth control advocates. It is an artificial way of rejecting sperm, avoiding birth. It's their biological instinct to evolve a way to prevent carrying low status male's children to term. Rape laws also assist them.

CopeWithTheRope #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Foid manager openly has hiring preference based on height.

So, I've been training in on a new job. First of all, working at a hospital is suicidefuel in itself. No explanation needed here. Anyways, the guy training me last night let let me know more about our manager; a foid in her mid 30s and still relatively attractive. He said she has admitted to hiring mostly tall men because she's "fascinated" by them, aka she wants to get fucked by these physically dom men in the doc lounge. Also he said that she probably hires shorter men so it's not obvious of her personal fetish. This said colleague is 6'5", wide frame, decent face and has a gf; a total normie. I'm a manlet, mind you. It all made sense, all the men in my dept. are tall, dom-looking males. She's literally openly discriminating against manlets.

This is exactly why foids should NEVER be in management at ANY job. It's not about the collective health and growth of the company they work for. Foids, if they can control it, only want to be surrounded by Chads and real "men", not little manlets. I'm glad I've received this tidbit, because I now know to really watch what I do from here on out. Last thing I need is to be the scapegoat because of my height.

Brutal blackpill for manlets, you'll always be under much more scrutiny because of something you can't control. It's over.

EyesAreSoCold #quack #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Darwinistic nature defeatists are wrong, "nature doesn't want us to have sex so we shouldn't" is a feminist doctrine disguised as a blackpill

"Women's sexual selection has rejected your genes so you should just respect that and never get laid".

I keep hearing this kind of appeal-to-nature reasoning even here. People that are decently blackpilled but somehow falls into this trap where they let women be exempt from morals and laws but not men, double standards! Many men have their minds operating within arbitrary boundaries that a century of feminist thought has created, their intellect obscured leads them to this fallacy.

Monogamous marriages and slut shaming, that kept inceldom at bay for thousands of years, are social constructs, but do you know what also are? Laws, police, taxation, all welfare services that are voraciously used by women, everything that shackles men and diminishes their natural advantages. If you reject all attempts to control women's sexuality because "it's natural and you can't fight nature bro" then you also invite men's primal violent nature to flourish and all murder and rape that comes with it.

Imagine if a stone age man came to life amidst our modern society, what would he do if he was horny and all women rejected him? Masturbate and browse .co? No he'd rape the first best woman he saw and fight to kill any interference, he hasn't been domesticated by any moral dogmas so his biological instincts is all he knows.

Do you really think women want to go back to that? They depend on men for protection and to be provided for, it's not as obvious today when all men are forced to proxy provide for women but it's still true. Is chad resourceful enough to support and protect his entire harem? Not likely.

I'm not saying this egoistic anarchy is ideal but that is the inevitable end of feminism, you can't expect men to be good boy slaves forever.

W. F. Price #fundie the-spearhead.com

Ross Douthat, the NY Times’ token youngish conservative, came out today with an op-ed provocatively titled “Social Liberalism as Class Warfare.” This is a theme I’ve been hitting on a lot recently because I think it’s an overlooked but nonetheless very important component of politics in the US. Douthat, in his usual roundabout, overly-sensitive and borderline deferential way (I wouldn’t count on that kind of kid glove treatment from the other side), argues that the values espoused by upper class elites are toxic to the middle and working classes.

In his piece, he addresses an argument made by Randy Waldman, who called efforts to resurrect traditional marriage a “cargo cult” (you see, Mr. Douthat, these are not very nice people), and points out that while socially liberal norms may work fine for those with plenty of money and connections, they have had disastrous consequences for the rest of us.

...

Obviously, they do not have the greater good at heart. Their clear hatred for the majority bears this out. As a resident of a deep blue city filled with people with elite pretensions, the viciousness toward anyone not on board with the socially-liberal, politically correct message is right out in the open. Unabashed, naked hostility toward dissenting points of view and advocacy for traditional values is what passes for progressivism in Seattle. No “live and let live” here… But I’ll let Douthat make his point.

...

Ah, there’s that word “meritocracy” again. Am I still the only one who fails to see the merit in these people’s values and lifestyle?

...

Here’s where Douthat constructs something of a strawman on behalf of social liberals. He’s saying, essentially, that there’s no conspiracy at work, and that they do in fact sincerely hold the beliefs they profess even if they don’t act on them. Well, this may be true, but you don’t need a conspiracy to explain a collective effort to do harm. There’s a much simpler explanation: malice.

These meritocrats just don’t like us. That’s why they use terms like “cargo cult” to explain our values. That’s why they instinctively take positions that are the exact opposite of ours. When they push policies that harm their lessers, it’s because it makes them feel good to see us brought low. Maybe some people think this is a far-fetched explanation, but who can deny that hostility toward outgroups is a fundamentally human characteristic?

AR-15 #conspiracy rightlyconsidered.org

This is really rich over at the homophonically-racist website, the Daily Noose. Professor of Philosophy and Law, Leslie* Green, tells us that when the right refers to universities as “liberal,” they mean universities filled with people who believe the following:

Species arose through natural selection.
No author of any gospel ever met Jesus.
Homosexuality is a normal variant in human behaviour.
The United States lost a war against Vietnam.
Human activity is a significant cause of climate change.
The United States has worse public health than do countries with nationalized health care.
Yet these beliefs are not the real threats to conservatives or the right. The true threats are the “habits of thought, modes of inquiry, and sensibilities of outlook,” which lead to such beliefs, in other words, conservatives feel threatened because “[universities] are universities.”

Got that? No, you say? Then let me mansplain it to all-y’all backwards readers of this humble blog: Them dumb tobacco chewin’ conservatives are threatened by the fact that there are all them smart fellers in them Iv’ry towers with that book learnin’ and stuff. It has nothing to do with the fact that at the Iv’ry towers they take as Gospel the following claims, with dissent met not with argument but ridicule:

-The only mechanism of common descent is natural selection.
-No authors of the Gospels ever met Jesus.
-Homosexuality is a normal [sic] variant in human behavior
-The war against Vietnam had little to do with stopping communist aggression of the north Vietnamese against the South and was not a political defeat but a military one.
-We should reduce fossil fuel use quickly by giving the government more control or else face disastrous consequences (#ClimateChangeIsReal).
-If you believe in yourself enough, you can be anything you want to be, including a man, woman, or whatever else you choose.
-You should be called an “Islamaphobe” if you denigrate Islam.
-Mexico is giving us their best and Trump is a racist (#RESIST). Because…
-Only whites can be racist.
-If you’re white, you come with a special cape that gives you “privilege power” no matter how dumb or poor your parents were.
-There is a serious problem of police injustice against blacks in the West. #BLM
-The “gender wage gap” is mostly to be explained by systematic injustices against women by (white) men.
-If you have four or five daughters, one of them is bound to get raped in college.
-Everyone should be able to go to college.
-There (REALLY) is a Constitutional right against the states to unlimited butt sechs.
-If you deny the above then you’re a bigoted bigot-faced bigot.

I’m sure I’ve missed a few. Perhaps some professors will help us fill in the gaps.

*Note: Not knowing Leslie, I don’t know if they identifies as a man, woman, or The Other. Thus, I have used the white, colonialist, capitalist, toxically masculine, gender-neutral, pronoun, “he” and various other forms to maximally be”on the wrong side of history.”

Matt Barber #fundie barbwire.com

“We must confess we are shocked at the violence and servility of the Judicial Revolution caused by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. We scarcely know how to express our detestation of its inhuman dicta, or to fathom the wicked consequences which may flow from it. … This decision has sapped the constitution [sic] of its glorious and distinctive features, and seeks to pervert it into a barbarous and unchristian channel … Jefferson feared this Supreme Court, and foretold its usurpation of the legislative power of the Federal Government. His prophecy is now reality. The terrible evil he dreaded is upon us.”

As many of us warned, this opinion is already being used to crush Americans’ constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. This was not lost on the Tribune, which added, “To say or suppose, that a Free People can respect or will obey a decision so fraught with disastrous consequences to the People and their Liberties, is to dream of impossibilities. No power can take away their rights. They will permit no power to abridge them.”

The New York Tribune was equally dismissive: “The decision, we need hardly say, is entitled to just as much moral weight as would be the majority of those congregated in any Washington bar-room.”

OK, I’ll come clean. The above quotes are not in reference to Obergefell. But they might as well have been. These quotes addressed the Supreme Court’s equally illegitimate 1857 Dred Scott decision. Whereas, in Dred Scott, the justices defied natural law and presumed a “right” for whites to own blacks, the court’s 2015 Obergefell decision likewise defied natural law and presumed to deconstruct and redefine the institution of marriage.

Both decisions are illegitimate, and here’s why. For the U.S. Supreme Court to justifiably overturn some law duly passed by the United States Congress, its opinion must be deeply rooted in one or more of the following:

A clear reading of the U.S. Constitution;
Some prior court precedent;
History and the Common Law;
Our cultural customs or traditions;
Some other law enacted by Congress.

As the high court’s four dissenting justices rightly observed in Obergefell, the “five attorneys” who invented this newfangled “right” to “gay marriage,” failed, abysmally, on each and every requirement.

The same was true of Dred Scott.

And so both opinions should be summarily ignored.

As President Andrew Jackson famously quipped of a Supreme Court opinion he thought usurped his executive authority, “[Chief Justice] John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!”

After the Dred Scott decision was released, Sen. William Pitt Fessenden, R-Maine, who later served as Abraham Lincoln’s secretary of treasury, said this: “[It is charged] that I am undermining the institutions of the country by attacking the Supreme Court of the United States! I attack not their decision, for they have made none; it is their opinion.”

brucewhain #racist realjewnews.com

Yes, international banking is a Jewish conspiracy. But how much longer would it have taken to get to this point if not?

The more money there is, the sooner governments will be able to pass it out, and bring a permanent high standard of living.

(As a 60-yr-old Holocaust denier of German descent who has had his livelihood completely stolen by Jews and their ignorant pompous minions - and it had nothing to do with Holocaust denial - you can be sure I’m totally anti-Semitic.

“Though I recognize something intimately familiar for instance in the voice of David Cole, and we know Brother Nathanael is certainly more Jewish than the current pope is Catholic - bad example - but both great forces fighting what is wrong in the world.)

Ron Paul’s proposed law to monitor the Fed - if you look at the existing affected laws - amounted to exactly nothing. No change. And Paul’s ranting to end the Fed (though I would have voted for him) if carried out according to his plan, would have had disastrous consequences, not unlike many Jewish subversive takeovers, where people end up starving amidst the Jews’ violent suppression.

It was a publicity stunt - that got him more votes and approval than any other of his proposed policies. Because it brought to the fore that the Fed is a conspiracy and dishonestly highjacks public funds.

But the actions are not the big danger posed by Jewish conspiratorial influence. They have an incentive to make the monetary system work and bring prosperity - if they don’t, they lose.

So though all currencies in the Western world are carefully manipulated and kept within reasonable trading ranges by manipulation of the big banks - who of course communicate with each other and in this way have created for themselves a giant, perpetual and nearly limitless ATM machine - the alternative to this manipulation is economic disaster.

It’s the only moral thing to do!

I know most will agree that the Jews have turned the western monetary system(s) into a perpetual money-making machine faster that any other group would have been able to do it. So we stand to benefit, esp. as (God willing) openness on the internet, at least in the US, continues to be a reality - so when big thieving improprieties occur there is at least a possibility for jail time.

We are following Japan - a mature economy - into the unknown. Before cooperation from the Fed, Japan tried again and again to manipulate their currency to bring changes necessary for prosperity, to no avail.

Now with the (illegal) manipulation moving ahead and bringing stable exchange rates in the established economies it’s only a matter of tweaking to get it right - though China, with it’s overwhelming possession intrinsic valuables, may pose problems of integration versus our nebulous currencies. But gold is certainly not the only legitimate gauge if intrinsic value!

There’s food, oil, and importantly, real estate.

The place where the Jewish conspiracy is most dangerous and destructive is not in making money, but in their persistence in trying to take over the world through use of this partially ill gotten money.

Their actions reveal a kind of stupidity - a lack of creativity - They don’t know what to do with the money - or the power it gives them. But nevertheless they push everything and everyone aside with Talmudic zeal in order the carry out their idiotic, destructive conspiracies.

So dummy with lots of bucks decides - Oh, we’re going to take over Ukraine for a tiny Jewish clique of proven assholes. (Well you’ll agree it’s proven now at least.) We’ll have power! We’ve placed enough Jews in the state department and been channeling enough funds to Marxist-like violent political agitation that we will be able to “rule”.

(I hate the word: Jews constantly use it because they are so obsessed with this kind of thing - it is a defect in God’s workmanship.)

These people have been warned over and over - the repeated outcomes of genocide are staring them in the face - BUT YET THEY PERSIST.

They need permanent restraint, through use of physical restraint - pain if necessary - or it’s psychical equivalent.

Fontaine #sexist incels.co

Once you accept that all relationships are nonsense, you are Roddy Piper in They Live putting on the glasses for the first time. Foids instinctively gravitate towards the biggest, strongest, most confident males because they want to mate with someone who gives them the highest chance of producing similar offspring, just like in the animal kingdom. Some aberration allowed the human brain to develop the ability to have imagination and this has led to nonsense like concepts of love, fulfillment and personality. No amount of feminist drivel or normoid self delusion can negate the basic instinct and that's why ugly guys struggle so badly.

Ap0calypse #sexist incels.co

Common IT arguments addressed #3

"Look at this ugly guy with a hot wife, this is proof that females don't all care about looks. Even your father reproduced bro, that means you can!"

Nobody is denying that if we waited until our 30s and got a good job, we could potentially have a platonic relationship with a female not sexually attracted to us. Most wives aren't sexually attracted to their husbands, since most males aren't sexually attractive to females. Them having kids doesn't mean that the wife initiates sex often with the husband out of biological attraction, it just means that she felt obligated to have sex a few times to maintain the illusion of a relationship. Marriages are mostly financial unions only romantic in name, we are not interested in a relationship with a female not interested in us sexually and only interested in our resources and occasional company. Mutual sexual/physical attraction is what makes a relationship valid, without this, its merely an over-glorified friendship.

"My husband earns less money than me, and he isn't conventionally attractive"

Even if he earns less money, he is still contributing his income towards you and keeping you company. Even if you "care about him", you still demonize him for making sexual advances and reluctantly have obligatory sex with him once a month. If a genetically attractive male becomes available, you may desire to act on your biological instinct and dump your husband or cheat on him. If an attractive male does become available and you choose to stay with your husband, congratulations. Remain unhappy and keep pretending your "sexual attraction" towards your husband isn't a lie.

I never understood the point in cherry picking.

People win the lottery too but that sure as hell isn't a viable way to solve your financial issues.

Its not even cherry picking at all when the examples they use are ultimately false.

If/when feminism removes the remaining monogamous/patriarchal social practices of society, females will no longer need to hide their true feelings and will congregate to fuck the top percentile males.

fschmidt #fundie happierabroad.com

How to cull humans

R-selected animals such as rats and modern people will just keep breeding as long as you give them food. For the last century or two, libtards have been feeding degenerates, causing their numbers to explode with predictably disastrous consequences. Clearly this needs to stop before they consume all the world's resources, but they also need to be culled back.

I must give credit where credit is due. The above is modified from Cornfed's post:

viewtopic.php?f=35&t=34845

The way Cornfed views blacks is how I view members of modern culture. I am just taking Cornfed's view and expanding it appropriately.

Of course there was a time when European-based culture was civilized and intelligent. But that was long ago. That culture has died and been replaced by degeneracy. This degeneracy causes rapid genetic decay as Cornfed himself explained:

viewtopic.php?t=20929

While today's descendants of Europeans are clearly genetically inferior to their ancestors, the incredibly rapid decay of intelligence and morality cannot fully be explained by genetics. There must also be a social aspect to this. Possibilities include being raised without a father, smartphone addiction, and the general decline of education. Whatever the explanation, these people currently behave like beasts, no better than a primitive tribe from black Africa.

I don't want to pick on whites. All members of modern culture are degenerate and act like r-selected animals. They must be culled. I see these possibilities:

1. Nuclear war.
2. Economic breakdown and mass starvation.
3. Some environmental disaster.
4. Political breakdowns leading to civil wars and starvation.

I don't have much preference between the choices. I look forward to anything that would cull the human scum that is currently infesting my world.

Wristlet 2 #sexist incels.co

[ToxicFemininity] Our society is so dystopic. You can't say anything bad about women or you're shunned. Even when women do things that conflict with their own bs.

It's just sad. Not only is our society cucked and feminist as fuck, but it even bends over backwards to accomodate things women want to do that are against feminist values, and even that can't be criticized or pointed out. Women are supposed to be independent, empowered, equal to men and all that shit, but when they settle down with a beta for the bux or sell their nudes, that's somehow ok and you aren't allowed to criticize that either.

Also a story:

One time, when building up my social skills after a lifetime of being bullied by my parents and socially isolated, I managed to make a few friends. My social skills were superficially ok but not really there yet at that moment. I was clubbing with a couple guys and, for some reason, one of my friends got into an agument with some women. He's a bit of a PUA (which is retarded, and the reason shit like this happens to him all the time, but still) and tried to hit on a girl among a group of friends, and as he went to touch her arm after talking for a bit, one of her friends pushed his arm away and yelled at him. He stood his ground and told her to not touch him again, so they all got hysterical and started crying rape and we had to leave the place.

Afterwards, we randomly met a guy from another friend group I made. It was a typical turbo soyboy, but I didn't know that kinda shit back then, and told him the story and how unfair they were to my friend. And just like that he stopped talking to me as did the rest of that friend group. Wtf man.

Soy simpers get treated like shit by foids. Pretty good lifefuel btw.

how is this life fuel bro its just sad

Its sad that they lack any self awareness. They get what they deserve for being white knighting faggots.

fair point ngl my friend had it coming, but what about the rest of the story

I was talking about the guys who cried rape, not your friend who tried to pick up the girl.

no it was a group of girls

How dare he expect a foid to treat him like a person!

tbh

Augustine #fundie loveofyourlove.blogspot.com

I haven't been posting for a while, for a variety of reasons, but I really MUST post this.

Condoms do not work. They simply cannot guarantee to prevent either pregnancy or infection 100% of the time. This has disastrous consequences.

A friend of one of my friends, a girl of 15 years of age, recently had sex with her boyfriend. They used a condom. They used it properly. They were not drunk. They believed they were being responsible and indeed did everything that modern medicine and education tell young persons to do. It tore during intercourse. It failed completely.

The sad thing is that she was so terrified upon discovering this, that the day after she took the 'morning-after pill', a chilling euphemism for what is essentially a chemical abortion. She did not even know whether she was pregnant or not.

YET THIS IS THE ACTION ADVISED IN SCHOOLS ALL ACROSS THE UK.

"DO WHAT YOU LIKE, AND CONDOMS WILL PREVENT CONSEQUENCES. IF IN DOUBT, ABORT."

Because society had so conditioned this poor girl - a charming, friendly, good natured girl -into believing that condoms were a secure license to unconstrained sexual activity, she felt free to do as she pleased without any risks. Secondly, our quick-fix society then pressures her into abortion, explicitly telling young girls that they must abort THE VERY NEXT DAY, in effect giving them less than 24 hours to make an actual LIFE OR DEATH DECISION!

This is sickening!

Why can nobody see the cataclysmic folly of this kind of thinking?

Anders #fundie new.euro-med.dk

Illuminati/Masonic Dehumanisation of the Masses

[...]

In a world of ignorance, apathy, gross contradiction, cognitive dissonance and denial … what will it take for the masses to wake up? Granted, they have been deceived, but living in zombie-like trances they lack responsibility towards themselves and their fellow humans: It’s therefore no surprise to see them buy into the effronteries and blindly give their consent to the ruling elite’s agendas, not knowing about the underlying hidden, dark and destructive ulterior motives.

A major effect of these agendas is that they are dehumanizing. In light of this, here are 5 indicators to show how the ruling elite’s agendas are covertly dehumanizing the masses on many levels for manipulation, and what needs to be done to prevent the disastrous consequences.

For instance, in a recent article, Google engineering director Ray Kurzweil and here in so many words, claims that a stronger, brighter and sexier human race will emerge before 2045. Enhanced Homo sapiens Mk-2 will have had their brains fused with technology, belong in a technological cybernetic society to become a singularity… -Some of us can’t help thinking that this is something to greatly mistrust.

See Project Moscow 2045 – started by media mogul Itskov: The Devil speaks and rejoices.
Ray Kurzweil is Jewish – and Dmitry Itskov, the author of “Moscow 2045” has a Jewish surname from the Minsk region

Here follow 5 characteristics of the NWO dehumanisation/Making of Zombies.

I: The transhumanism agenda is a deception. Retrospectively, just about everything the ruling elite do only benefits a relative small handful of individuals and transhumanism will be no exception. Through the technology, the rest of the populace will be enslaved in a technological mind control prison…

The more humans who incorporate themselves with cybernetics or anything else making up transhumanism, the more they will lose their powerful connection to spirituality and all those qualities related to unconditional love; kindness, empathy, generosity, big-heartedness, concern… Thus, humans will lose their true power to stop the new world order and may even become extinct.
Transhumanism is greatly flawed. Major tenets of transhumanism are based on false pretexts. For example, it assumes that consciousness is only activity in our brains in its attempt to preserve the brain and achieve immortality…

II: The artificial intelligence (AI) flaw
Following on, while it has made great science fiction, the idea of robots or computers becoming intelligent sentient beings, having the ability to be emotional and creative will never happen in the real world.

The Express 23 June 2016: BRUSSELS bureaucrats are considering transferring human rights to robots if artificial intelligence (AI) becomes so powerful that droids end up thinking for themselves.
the European Parliament to the EU Commission has suggested in the future sentient AI robots could need their own rights and responsibilities, and strict laws banning them from taking over too many jobs across the Continent may become necessary. In the 1950s Asimov predicted robots would eventually have to adhere to laws

*******************************************************************************

Everything a robot or computer does (or ever will) is only through a series of pre-programmed responses in conjunction with its database, having no free will choice.

And that’s it.

3. The hive mind
Transhumanism and AI threaten to dehumanize us in the respects that it will take away our individuality. Instead of being free to express our natural unique creative and playful individuality, we will be forced to become ‘empty shells,’ as one with the hive mind. When the control-obsessed technocrats try to force their depersonalizing hive mind ideology it will cause many problems and humans are sure to revolt(???).

Just one of many flaws in the technocracy agenda.

5. T.H.E.Y want you to be like them
T.H.E.Y (The Hierarchy Enslaving You) want you to be heartless empty shell psychopaths, driven by self-interests and gratification in their hierarchical controlling pyramidal power structures…

T.H.E.Y want you to be the effect of their owned and controlled mainstream media, as, for instance, through the soul-jarring music blasting out and TV or movies where people are so horrible to each other…

Fake mainstream media news, fake money, fake medicine, fake political democracies, fake wars, etc. – as if that wasn’t enough, T.H.E.Y want you to willingly fit into their archontic fake existence through transhumanism … ultimately leading to your destruction, as secretly planned…

That concludes just 5 of the many indicators showing how the ruling elite’s agendas are dehumanizing the masses.

proph #fundie collapsetheblog.typepad.com

Christianity and Authority

Want to turn someone off to Christianity immediately? Explain to them that it is a foundationally authoritarian religion.

It is. Really. Christ did not say "Follow your conscience"; he said "Follow me."

The Bible bristles with commandments and instructions, often to excruciating detail and with elaborate (and frequently violent) punishments for infractions. And it is soaked through with authoritarian imagery: crowns (of thorns), yokes (Christ's gentle one vs. the heavy one of sin), thrones, kingdoms and kings, Fathers and mothers.

Modern man hates all order and authority and therefore cannot tolerate this. So when he does not reject Christianity outright (95% of the time) in favor of either atheism or something that appeals to his instinct for solipsistic self-worship (e.g., Buddhism), he will try to rationalize this business away through flimsy neo-Marcionite heresies, declaring Christ to be the completion and perfection of the mean old fuddy-duddy God of the Old Testament. (For why exactly this is a heresy, consult John 10:30).

So Christianity is necessarily and foundationally authoritarian, and the logical consequence of this is that Catholicism, which adheres most closely to this authoritarian ideal, is a very easy religion to comprehend. The rules are laid out: simply follow them. If you don't like it, if you have doubts, just shut up and follow them, anyway. And it's for this reason that the talk of conscience in the present Catechism strikes me as especially dangerous. Nearly everyone nowadays is pregnant with the spirit of Protestantism and so interprets conscience to mean "whatever I intuit the good to be," which of course has led us to the present catastrophic collapse in the moral integrity of the Church. How many contracepting Catholics have I argued with who have cloaked themselves in the armor of "conscience" and thereby rendered themselves invincible to every appeal to reason, tradition, Scripture, and Catechism? I've lost count. Conscience has become the dagger with which Catholic quislings backstab the bride of Christ. In practice it is not much more than the will to disbelieve.

When I try to explain this -- even to Catholics -- I'm invariably accused of conformity and blind submission. All of which is not only absolutely true but absolutely mandatory of all Christians, which has precisely been my point all along!

Submit to God's will completely and without reservation and be saved, or insist on your autonomy and rot in Hell. It shouldn't be a hard choice.

Jon-Marc #fundie christianforums.net

Ever since the lie of evolution was brought into the picture, many believe we evolved from animals. That lie makes us no better than animals. The way some people act, I could almost believe that about them.

Looking at animal behavior and trying to prove by that behavior that homosexuality is normal is quite a stretch. Just another feeble attempt by homosexuals to justify their perverted behavior. To use that example as proof is saying that they are as dumb as animals with no ability to think or reason for themselves. Animals live and act by instinct alone and just have a natural desire to procreate and can't always tell whether the one they're trying to mate with is male or female.

Humans know the difference and sometimes choose to be with their own gender instead of the way God intended--one male with one female.

Anti-Imperialist National Democratic Front #fundie ndfsk.dyndns.org

S. Korean Authorities Should Ponder over DPRK's Patriotic Appeal

All Koreans in the north and the south and abroad ardently wish to see the inter-Korean relations improve and peace and stability settle on the Korean peninsula in response to the DPRK's new year's appeal for paving a broad avenue to independent reunification by polling their intention and efforts, said a spokesman for the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Country (CPRC) of the DPRK in a statement issued on February 1.

The statement went on:

The south Korean puppet regime is, however, blowing the stereo-typed confrontation trumpet from the outset of the new year, bringing "north's denuclearization" and "its human rights issue" to the fore. It is crying out for establishing "a perfect alert posture" and taking "effective counteraction," vociferating about "north's threat" and "unpredictable provocation" every day, and busy making war drumbeats for invading the north everywhere.

We are well aware that "security crisis" much touted by the south Korean puppet regime, hyping " the north's threat and provocation", is aimed at saving Park Geun Hye from the crisis of impeachment though she is hit hard from all sides.

If the south Korean authorities opt for reckless confrontation and provocation in a bid to put the alarming internal situation under control, this may spill over into an unimaginable conflict and war and eventually lead to their shameful destruction.

They will only suffer bitterer disgrace and humiliation if they blindly toe the U.S. line, failing to properly judge the rapidly changing situation in the neighboring countries and being unable to discern who is real principal enemy of the nation, accustomed to clinging to coattails of big powers.

They should come to their senses and opt for carving out the independent destiny of the nation in response to the DPRK's offer of reconciliation before it is too late. This is the demand of all Koreans and the last advice of history.

If the south Korean authorities take the road of reckless confrontation and war in pursuance of the U.S. policy, defying the DPRK's sincere goodwill and appeal, the DPRK's tolerance and patience will go beyond their limit and in that case they will be held wholly accountable for the ensuing disastrous consequences.

Jim #sexist blog.jim.com

Evolutionary psychology predicts that a man will love a woman he regularly has sex with, who lives with him and that he lives with and will be inclined to look after her welfare, which is not necessarily the same thing as doing what she wants. He will do what he thinks is good for her, and make her do what he thinks is good for her, even if she wants something different. Because one flesh. Taking care of her is taking care of her capacity to bear him children and raise his children.

It does not predict that she will love him all that much, since Gnon wants resources transferred from men to women, and from parents to children, but it does predict that she will obey him, respect him, and physically desire him, in order that he can take care of her and the children they have together.

That is how it supposed to work.

If, however, she is someone else’s wife, or is staying with her family rather the joining with him to form a new family, thus someone else is going to be looking after his kids by her, maybe the state is going to be taking care of her and he is just passing through, then evolutionary psychology predicts romantic love, that he will flatter her and do whatever she wants, no matter how foolish, unreasonable, and self destructive, as Lancelot treated Guinevere.

So, evolutionary psychology predicts that males will primarily experience romantic love in the case of adultery, and to a lesser extent in casual fornication. It predicts that they they will experience the love that a husband bears his wife after they have been living together and having sex for a while. And that women will tend to be at best good wives, rather than in love with their husbands. The wife who craves the seed of a man more alpha than her husband says

“I do not love my husband any more, therefore it is OK for me to service this rock musician and his biker roadies”

but women never love men all that much. They are not supposed to. They are supposed to respect, honor, obey, and desire their husbands.

Thus, the second mention of sexual love in the bible: Rebekah meets Isaac, explains herself. “And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother’s death.” The first mention of sexual love in the bible on the other hand has love and romance preceding sex and marriage instead of following sex and marriage – and things go badly wrong.

Romantic love was celebrated by the troubadours, and as depicted by the troubadours, was always adulterous love. King Arthur’s wife Guinevere desired Lancelot, and had sex with him, and Lancelot romantically loved Guinevere, King Arthur’s wife. In consequence Lancelot does lots of stupid humiliating self sacrificing things that prove his enormous burning love, Guinevere acts like an arrogant depraved obnoxious spoiled slut bitch, the fellowship of the Round Table breaks up, Camelot is defeated, and everyone gets killed.

This makes sense for maximizing reproductive fitness. Crazy destructive passion in order to cuckold other men, calm, gentle, firm, nurturing affection for one’s own family. Romance is what the troubadours depicted with alarming accuracy.

Romance is defect/defect equilibrium. Lancelot believes he is sacrificing himself for Guineverein in a Christlike fashion, and the troubadours believed he was sacrificing himself for Guinevere in a Christlike fashion, but in fact he is maximizing his Darwinian genetic self interest at the expense of everyone else. Guinevere also behaves badly to both Lancelot and to her husband King Arthur because she is maximizing her genetic self interest at the expense of everyone else.

Guinevere and King Arthur are in a defect/cooperate relationship. King Arthur is cooperating with Guinevere, by looking after her, and cooperating with Lancelot, in that Lancelot gets benefits as a knight of the fellowship of the Round table, while Lancelot and Guinevere are defecting on King Arthur.

King Arthur, of course, finds out, and Camelot gets defect/defect. Everyone is much worse off, and Camelot falls. That is Romance.

Sexual love is a bad thing except inside the confines of marriage. Men are supposed to have sex first and love later, and women are not really supposed to love men all that much at all. Nowhere in the bible are we told of women loving their husbands, and Guinevere treats both Lancelot and King Arthur very badly. We are, however, fairly frequently told in the bible of women seeking the love of their husbands.

If a woman thinks she is love, she is lying to get some alpha cock. Perhaps lying to herself because all the books she reads and all the movies and television shows she watches tell her that romantic love justifies and purifies every kind of horrible bad behavior. In reality, women are never in love all that much, rather they experience desire for love and sex, which they confuse with love when they proceed to do bad things in pursuit of this desire. Rather than loving a man, a woman desires to be loved by a man. If a man is in romantically in love with a woman whom he is not living with and having regular sex with in his own bed, he is crazy or evil.

What is the Red Pill?

It is the practical and applied knowledge of the Dark Enlightenment, the bad news about how the world really is, and especially and particularly the bad news about the nature of women. The Dark Enlightenment is science and the Red Pill is engineering. There is a certain cynical ruthlessness about the Red Pill. You are told how to use it against other people, and how to protect yourself from other people. Much seemingly virtuous and altruistic behavior, like the behavior of Lancelot towards Guinevere, is revealed to be foolish or, more commonly, wicked and dangerous. Even virtue is reduced to pragmatic self interest – virtue is trying to get into and maintain cooperate/cooperate relationships – as distinct from pretending to virtue in order to get into defect/cooperate relationships. Also, virtue is developing one’s own excellence, as for example lifting iron, or perfecting social skills.

What is the Blue Pill?

It is the official truth about the way the world supposedly works, and particularly and especially the official truth about the nature of women. If women were really the way that the blue pill says they are, then the behaving towards women the way that progressives say you are supposed to behave would work. Unfortunately, the way you are supposed to behave fails, and fails horribly badly with utterly disastrous consequences.

What is the Purple Pill?

It is an attempt to reconcile Red Pill truths with Blue pill morals: “Not All Women are Like That”. It is an attempt to avoid the most grossly self destructive behavior commanded by the Blue Pill, while still accepting that Blue Pill behavior is wise and virtuous behavior, rather than foolish, destructive, self destructive, and evil behavior. It is an attempt to reconcile with reality while remaining virtuous as Blue Pillers see virtue. But Blue Pill “virtues” are like Lancelot’s love for Guinevere: They are evil in themselves, and manifestations of evil. It was wrong for Lancelot to love Guinevere, as much wrong as it was wrong for Guinevere to have sex with Lancelot. Not only is it unwise to be the equal of your wife, it is also wicked. It is your job to supervise and discipline your wife, and some women, not all of them, not most of them, but quite a lot of them, sometimes need to be physical disciplined. You are wicked if you are not prepared to physically discipline your wife and your children in the unfortunate case that the necessity should occur.

What is the Black Pill?

The Black Pill is despair at the sad and cynical truths of the Red Pill, and the belief that we are doomed, that we as individuals shall not know a good sexual and family relationship, that we shall have few or no great grandchildren, that our race shall perish, that our homelands will be flooded by hostile angry sullen low IQ aliens who live on crime, welfare, and voting for the left, who get violent at microaggressions, that our civilization will die, overrun like Detroit and Salisbury by savages incapable of operating civilization.

What is the White Pill?

Deus Vult: That we will be victorious. That those of us that are lucky and strong will create proper families, that we will have love and grandchildren, that we will save our civilization and conquer the enemies of our civilization. That the able will rule over their inferiors, and men will rule over women, as is right for us to do.

Various Incels #sexist #psycho #pedo incels.co

RE: [SuicideFuel] [NSFW] This is what Chad gets to do with prime teenage girls while you rot alone in your room

(AAAAAAAAAAAcel)

I have a great want to put a bullet into that guy's skull, piss on his corpse, rape the foid and then piss on the foid

(Words2_live_bye)

NOO NO NO NO ON FUCK FUCK FUCK
I HATE EVERYONE
FUCK YOU ALL
AGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH GIVE ME TEENAGE PUSSY

(Robtical)

Whoever sees this and still thinks whores deserves to vote and get our tax money needs to be bitch slapped.

One of my dreams is touching a girls ass. And these chads get to do it for free.

I need me a girl with a fat ass. I only need one thing

You're not entitled to a girl with a fat ass inkel.
But they're entitled to your tax money.

(Ultimatepassivecel)

Real teen girls are busy doing shit like this while soyboys in IT are shitting on us for finding fictional 17 year olds attractive

(FUCKITALLREEE)

"Prime" jfl she looks like a 20 something roastie that ride the cock carousel since high school.

whatever helps you survive through another day

If you thinks she is special and/or prime, you have to put your simp glasses off. 20 years old are already been used up by many chads.

They're all used up, and you'd fall for them in a heartbeat if they gave you the attention and validation you crave.

As a truecel it is impossible for them to feel attraction towards me, and even if i would win the lottery and some hoe try to come by, i know too much about the blackpill and foid nature to fall for any bullshit front they put up.

UpsideDown #sexist incels.co

[Discussion] [Blackpill] I think that the beta uprising is already happening

Yep, that's right, i think that the beta uprising is already happening, just not in the way we thought it would, and i'll explain why.

With things like Redpill, MGTOW and Blackpill flooding the mainstream media, combined with most of the average and below-average males growing up in single mother's/divorced parent's homes, in a decadent economy, and getting basically nothing but disdain from women, a perfect storm is forming in the horizon. Although the uprising is silent for the most part, as we're basically invisible, the consequences of so many men dropping out of the dating market will bring consequences that will ripple trough generations, making our vengeance a long-lasting one.

Do you want to see an example? Look no further than Japan, with it's abyssal birth rate, miserable women and herbivore men, their silent "uprising" is making the country go into mayhem. Japan's economy haven't seen any substantial growth since the 90s, their population is aging and the government will have to accept migrants to replace the population and keep the country going.

Do you know what that means? Japan, a millenar country that sustained a shitload of wars and even nuclear bombs during it's lifespan, is being destroyed by a bunch of betas that simply do not comply with the rules, in the span of a few decades. With time, we will also turn the west for the worst, leaving lingering consequences, just by playing vidya, eating tendies and not contributing to shit.

TL;DR: The beta uprising is already going on just by men not marrying and contributing, and it will fuck up society for a long time

Fred reed #fundie fredoneverything.org

Most of these happy proximities have produced bloodbaths, actual genocide or attempts at it, forced migration as when Uganda threw out its Indians, mass butchery by machete as in Rwanda, repeated bombings in London, and such like exuberances. Other disasters are still only in the simmering stage. Americans are among those being simmered.

From which one might conclude that diversity is the principal cause of human unhappiness, mightn’t one?

In America the pattern holds. We are seeing serious and increasing racial attacks by blacks on whites and the looting of shopping malls that has now become traditional, like picnics on the Fourth of July: hunting and gathering. The importation of Moslems is reaching the point at which they can become the grave and irremediable problem that they are everywhere else. The growing Hispanic population causes friction, particularly in the Southwest and provokes cries for expulsion.

Lay the blame where you will: on white racists, black racists, racists of whatever color, on God or genes or sunspots. But reflect, though, on how very much of the trouble reported daily in the news arises from diversity. For example, achievement gaps, suspension rates in schools, rapes, honor killings, shootings by police, shootings of blacks by blacks, complaints of discrimination, interracial gang-beatings, affirmative action, mass demonstrations, actual terrorism, shootings of cops, demands for censoring of books and the removal of statues and the renaming of highways. Diversity is by a wide margin the worst nightmare facing the US.

All of which would suggest even to the birds of the air, the kine of the fields, to box turtles and retarded marmosets and the alert among the great apes that diversity is a terrible idea. Mix different kinds of people and you get trouble. In politics, diversity also grates. Those most afflicted by the twin scourges of liberalism and conservatism despise each other and do not willingly associate. Feminists and men, city slickers and rednecks, dogs and cats—all hate each other. So what should America’s response be?
Isn’t it obvious?

Yes! It’s so clear! We should import more weird, backward, dull-witted, useless, and inassimilable civilizational disasters, many of which have produced nothing more technologically challenging than the pointed stick. What could be a better idea?

And once we’ve got them, there’s no getting rid of them.
It is currently considered good manners to regard all cultures as equally meritorious, but let us see this idea as what it is—perhaps good manners, but political idiocy. Suppose that Jimmy Joe McWhilliker in Lost Hope, Tennessee genitally mutilated his daughters, refused to let them go to school, forced them to wear funny black bags, didn’t let them go out alone, made them marry smelly elderly Pakistanis against their will, and killed them if they weren’t virgins. That’s equal? To what?

But that’s what we are importing, boys and girls. And if you don’t think this thirteenth-century nightmarish subhuminism is just peachy, why…you are…Islamophobic!

As any decent person would be.

But here we come to the heart of the matter—fairly tales. The foundation of American political thinking, if that is quite the word, is that we should all love one another and therefore do, when in fact all of us don’t, and those who say we should carefully avoid those who they think the rest of us should love.
(Simple declarative sentences are the soul of good writing.)
It might be a good idea for us to use such minor rational capacity as we have to avoid doing stupid things that will have a heavy price. The world is what it is, not what we want it to be. Mixing even civilized peoples is not a good idea. Put thirty million Japanese in America, or Americans in Japan, and trouble will result. This, even though the Japanese are an advanced and well-behaved people, and Americans are reasonably close. But Somalis, for God’s sake? Syrians?

The human animal is hard-wired to be hostile to other groups, to strangers, to intruders. It is the dog-pack instinct. This limbic paranoia manifests itself all through life. If a Russian recon plane comes near the United States, the Air Force frantically scrambles fighters to go intercept it, though the likelihood that Russia would send an ancient prop-job to attack the US is zero. When a strange dog passes in front of our house, our three mutts dash to the front fence to bark in witless territorial fury. They lack the hands to be pilots, though.

When people have no cause for conflict, they invent it. For this we have football teams in which armored felons having no connection to us attack somebody else’s felons—and we become deeply involved emotionally. In the cities street gangs, often though not always of different races, fight for territory as idiotically as countries. Always it is us and them, and we can always find thems. Movies are largely about forces of good—us—against forces of bad—them.

BlkPillPres ‘(“I'm Not A Monster, I'm Just Ahead Of The Curve”) #psycho incels.co

[Blackpill] [Hard To Swallow Edition] Many Incels Are Mentally Normies And Function As Dangerous Sleeper Agents (The Importance Of Extremism)

If you are an incel pretty much all normies period, including any friends and family members, ARE YOUR ENEMY (whether you admit it or not)

I don't want to bring harm to them (my friends and family) or any of their lives, but if I have to choose between a world where I get what I want and they get what they want, I choose me, and I can only choose me, because there is no middle ground when your views and desires are so parallel

To make it simple, are you an omnivore that likes animals, or are you a vegan that likes animals

The rationale of a vegan is that because they like animals they must sacrifice their own desires and never eat meat for the sake of animals
The rationale of a omnivore is that the laws of nature are separate from them liking animals and they will still eat meat regardless

Incels need to be honest with themselves and identify whether they are vegan or an omnivore

For example, the corona virus spreading and wreaking havoc across the planet would be glorious for me, I could stay up for an hour or two eating popcorn watching youtube videos of news reports of the thousands upon thousands of deaths, it would be a boon to my spirits for sure. If I got it I wouldn't even be worried, I have a pretty strong immune system and if I died then big whoop I'd finally be free from my shitty existence. I have already mentally dealt with the possiblity that some of my friends or family may die, and I have accepted that, because that's how life is, and they are not on my side

But some of you (incels reading right now) are going to lose family members and friends to the virus too, you have to be mentally prepared enough to accept these outcomes, every incel has to understand that our goals and the goals of all normies are DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED, when one side wins the other loses by default, there is no middle ground

So in every "victory" be mindful that for some of us there will be collateral damage, you have to be fully aware which side you are on and what that means, because if your will falters you'll end up just inconveniencing yourself and other incels, you'd have wasted years pretending to be something you're not

For example a lot of incels on here I'm sure will make rape jokes very easily, and if you hear about some case of some stacey whore who got raped or sexually assaulted you'll laugh it up, but the moment a female family member or "someone close" gets assaulted and/or raped you'll do a 180 and its no longer funny, and its "not ok", and now the rest of us need to cowtow to your new found sensibilities, that's just hypocrisy, which is the point of this thread, making people self aware enough to understand this and self reflect on whether or not you should really be a part of this kind of community

I think a lot of men are bandwagoning onto inceldom due to how negatively hypergamy affects their lives, but they are doing so not being fully aware of the gravity of the situation, and not being mentally prepared to make certain choices and take certain stances, many are unaware that they have not truly taken a stance/side yet, and its only when shit hits close to home that they will truly realize that they actually stand ON THE NORMIE SIDE despite it being against their interests (because they are emotional thinkers rather than logical thinkers)

THAT'S THE SCARY PART, because something like this can happen to someone who we might all one day see at some "incel meetup", next thing you know were all getting doxxed because he's feeling bad that some female relative got raped, and now he's learned the "error of his ways"

Take @jackbud for example:

He is exhibit A of this, I would be on fucking edge if I knew I had sent this guy an image of my face, or talked about my personal life and mentioned where I live, etc. I'd basically have to quit using the site at that point after this video came out, because it'd be too much of a risk, he'd know my name, if he saw a post from me that he thought was "wrong" he could just doxx me and rationalize that as him "helping me become a better person"

HAVING WISHY WASHY "EMOTIONAL THINKER INCELS" IN AN INCEL COMMUNITY IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS

I think every incel needs to do a little mental exercise with themselves:
Come up with a list of worst case incel themed scenarios that affect family, friends, etc (normies) and really visualize it, put yourself in that scenario and ask yourself which side do you choose, how do you feel, why you are making said decision, etc. If more of us did this, you'd see a lot more self exiles and a lot less bans, and way less users saying - "you are going too far", "you are making us look evil", etc

A lot of incels are basically "sleeper agent" larps and they don't even realize it, they think they are one of us and share the same values and they don't realize that they couldn't be further from the truth

ITS A LOT EASIER TO CALL YOURSELF INCEL INSTEAD OF FAILED NORMIE

Many users here would report the members of this site without hesitation under the right circumstances if a witch hunt happened and they had "learned the error of their ways"

THIS IS WHY EXTREMISM IS IMPORTANT

It draws a line in the sand and gives those watching the line a huge reality check, because when they realize they can't cross it, they realize that inceldom and the black pill is not something they can be a part of

They'll leave and they won't endanger the future well being of actual incels and actual black pillers, and they won't waste their time "frontin" as something they aren't

A lot of users are chasing "the edge", that feeling you get when being part of something seen as "fringe" and/or "dangerous", but they don't actually want anything to do with it, when things shift from being:

Theoretical and impersonal ("JFL @ stacey tourists in an islamic country getting their heads cut off")
TO
Practical and personal ("My becky/stacey sister who I know dresses like a slut was raped at a club")

People start realizing quick where they actually stand, nobody is expecting you to laugh at your sister getting raped, but were definitely expecting you to remain logically consistent and admit that she contributed to the circumstances leading to her rape, and she's no different than any of the other foids you hate for those same choices


AS A BLACK PILLER YOU NEED TO DECIDE WHERE YOU STAND BEFORE SHIT GETS BAD