[on Twitter, an excerpt from the Candace Owens Show...]
Candace Owens on Native Americans: "They were literal cannibals, it's been proven...that stuff stopped when white men began believing in a monotheistic worldview and started assigning morality"
[on Twitter, an excerpt from the Candace Owens Show...]
Candace Owens on Native Americans: "They were literal cannibals, it's been proven...that stuff stopped when white men began believing in a monotheistic worldview and started assigning morality"
RE: Video: ANC and Mainstream Media Are South Africa’s Problems, Not Whites – Unathi Kwaza
The Candace Owens of South Africa. She has no sway except to convince gullible Whites that the there is a pot of gold at the end of the Rainbow Nation, when actually it's a big soup pot waiting to boil your bones.
This is what I've noticed about 'conservative' blacks. They say and do things that their conservative white base is terrified to say or do and get paid well for doing that while the liberal blacks make money agitating against whites. These gullible conservative whites think these 'conservative' blacks are on their side. They are so naive.
It's like that with whites. Liberal whites are not 'down' with helping out blacks or nonwhites. They say that to save face as many liberal whites don't live anywhere near black and nonwhite areas. In the end, your race trumps your politics.
Speaking of Candace Owens, didn't she support affirmative action and have a doxxing website? Could be wrong, but that's what I've heard.
Conservative pundit and speaker Candace Owens has responded to criticism of recently unearthed remarks she made late last year commenting on Hitler while defending the term nationalism.
A clip of her answer posted to Twitter has been viewed more than two million times. Many on social media have criticized a portion of her answer in which Owens comments, "if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay fine."
On Friday, Owens dismissed the controversy and blamed "Leftist journalists" for mischaracterizing her comments.
Hitler was "a homicidal, psychotic maniac" and there is "no excuse or defense ever for ... everything that he did," she clarified.
Her comments were meant to show that Hitler was not a nationalist, she said. Hitler did not put Germans first; he "was putting German Jews into concentration camps and murdering he was a mass murderer," she said.
In the comments, Owens answered an audience member who asked for a "longterm prognosis" about the terms "globalism" and "nationalism."
Owens embraced the term nationalism; claiming the definition gets "poisoned" by proponents of globalism.
I actually don't have any problems at all with the word 'nationalism.' I think that it gets, the definition gets poisoned by elitists that actually want globalism. Globalism is what I don't want. So when you think about, whenever we say 'nationalism,' the first thing people thing about, at least in America, is Hitler. You know, he was a national socialist, but if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay fine. The problem is ... he had dreams outside of Germany. He wanted to globalize. He wanted everybody to be German. Everybody to be speaking German. Everybody to look a different way. ... To me that's not nationalism.
At this point black skin conveys so much privilege in our society that it serves as primary qualification to be Attorney General and even President of the United States. Rehashing liberal propaganda to reinforce the bogus victim status of blacks is hardly productive when those of us not lucky enough to be “oppressed” find it hard to get work.
There is only one appropriate defense against the racism charge race-obsessed liberals inevitably throw at their opponents: conservatives and libertarians believe in individual liberty, and race is irrelevant at the individual level. Attempting to out-pander Democrats is shameful and pointless.
Make Western Civilization Great Again
Universities have been ceding ground to anti-Western activists for decades now (remember Jesse Jackson leading chants of “Hey ho, hey ho, Western civ has got to go” at Stanford back in the ‘80s?). So it should come as no surprise that Yale recently announced it would grant yet another concession to multiculturalist students who demand that diversity of skin color replace the oppressiveness and irrelevance of Dead White Males: this spring will see the end of one of the school’s previously most popular classes, a survey course called “Introduction to Art History: Renaissance to the Present.”
According to the Yale Daily News blog, in its final iteration the course will shift from transmitting to students a greater appreciation of their cultural heritage, to a more “woke” focus on subverting the canon of Western art itself. The course’s instructor, art history department chair Tim Barringer, has stated that the class will still cover Western art chronologically from 1300 to the present, but he intends to emphasize that other regions, genres and traditions are as “equally deserving of study” as Western art, because according it any special reverence is “problematic.”
As we are all reminded daily now in every cultural arena from academia to Hollywood, anything Western is “problematic” (to put it politely) because multiculturalist doctrine deems that all cultures must be revered equally – except for Western culture which, because of its association with the toxic privilege of “whiteness,” must be denigrated, deconstructed, and dismantled to heal the nonwhite victims of its oppression and exploitation. Thus, we must be careful not to elevate the great works of the greatest artists in world history over other, “equally deserving” genres and traditions.
In a syllabus note to potential students, Barringer wrote that the emphasis would be on the relationship between European art and other world traditions. That is a fair topic for study, considering that Western artists have occasionally been influenced by other traditions: Picasso and African masks, for example (although such influence now would be devalued as “cultural appropriation,” another racist concept concocted by the postmodern and/or Marxist left). But the class also, according to Barringer, will consider art in relation to – wait for it – “questions of gender, class and ‘race’” and will discuss its relationship to Western capitalism. In other words, immersing ourselves in the transcendence and beauty that literally define great art and touch our common humanity must take a back seat to imposing our earthbound interpretations of how art divides us. Climate change also will be a “key theme.” Of course it will, because all intellectual streams now must feed into the river of today’s acceptable groupthink.
The Yale Daily News also reports that Barringer said he will invite students to write an essay nominating a work of art that has been left out of the course’s curriculum or its textbook. “I’m really looking forward to seeing what works the students come up with to counteract or undermine my own narratives,” he wrote. Newsflash, professor: your job is to educate and open the minds of your students, not see what these kids “come up with” to undermine your “narratives.” If they’re coming to school to lecture you and delegitimize your expertise, then what is the point of your job? What is the point of an art history department if art history can be wiped out or rewritten to suit and validate the gender- and race-obsessed whims of youth? Indeed, what is the point of a university anymore if it only exists to conform to the arrogant demands of children drunk with the power of their own dogmatic wokeness?
This change in the History of Art Department follows the Yale English Department’s decision in 2017 to “decolonize” its degree requirements after students presented a petition demanding that a survey course called “Major English Poets be abolished, and that the pre-1800/1900 requirements be refocused to deliberately include literatures relating to gender, race, sexuality, ableism, and ethnicity.” Yale caved then as well, making the course introducing English majors to such luminaries as Shakespeare, Chaucer, Milton, Spenser, Wordsworth, and Eliot “optional.” Meanwhile students can choose from such other options as “Black and Indigenous Ecologies,” “The Politics of Museums,” and “U.S. Afro-Latinx Literatures.”
Like far too many other universities, Yale quite simply has given students who have traded any sense of intellectual humility for belligerent activism too much power to determine the direction of their own edification. As the Yale Daily News notes, the art history major has adapted to changes “suggested” by students pushing to increase minority and female representation. The Director of Undergraduate Studies Marisa Bass noted, for example, that students have prompted the creation of art history courses like “Global Decorative Arts” and “The Politics of Representation.” She didn’t say whether there would be room in one of those courses for a truly notable “global decorative art” such as the breathtaking genius of Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel paintings (pictured above). Presumably, that would be “problematic” because Michelangelo is not representative of the correct skin color and genitalia that some students have declared must be prioritized.
There is nothing wrong with a history of world art survey course that examines art from all over the world. But the de-emphasis of Western art at a major university in a course whose time frame begins with the European Renaissance, and the administrative kowtowing to a very vocal minority of politicized students, is an intentional devaluation of our own civilizational achievements and does a disservice to students who need to be roused from the anti-Western indoctrination they are subjected to now from kindergarten onward. Teaching that our own culture has a “problematic” history while uncritically revering every other tradition is anti-intellectual, bigoted, and self-loathing. And downgrading our appreciation for and comprehension of great art to examining it in terms of its racial and class dynamics is reductionist and divisive.
It's time for our universities to help make Western civilization great again.
White Women Are in an Abusive Relationship with the Left
The Left can’t hide its contempt for white women. “White women are lucky that we are just calling them Karens,” Washington Post Global Opinions Editor Karen Attiah said in a since-deleted tweet. “And not calling for revenge.”
Miss Attiah, who is black, blamed white women for “the 1921 Tulsa massacre,” the “murder of Emmett Till,” and the “exclusion of black women from feminist movements.” She was also angry that “53% of white women vot[ed] for Trump.”
Miss Attiah didn’t back down in the face of criticism: “I’m just saying. Be happy we are calling for equality. And not actual revenge.” She eventually deleted her tweets, but she didn’t recant. In a follow-up, she promoted the “Karen” meme because it shows “how everyday white women uphold white supremacy through violence, aggression, and the weaponizing of their gender.”
The Washington Post editor is not alone. The Karen meme, which ridicules white women for upholding standards, is popular. Time published an article last week that praised the abuse of “Karens” because it lays bare the “violent history of white womanhood.” Teen Vogue published a piece attacking white women for upholding “white supremacy.” Bloomberg produced a video this week that demanded “White Women Privilege” be dismantled.
The Left heaps scorn on white women, even though they are increasingly the Left’s most devoted foot soldiers. Compared to 2014, 38 percent more white women think police killings are part of a broader problem rather than isolated incidents. This explains why most whites have a favorable view of Black Lives Matter. White women are common at many BLM protests. White women with college degrees favor Joe Biden over Donald Trump by 39 percent. Younger white women hold more liberal views on race, immigration, and social issues than young white men.
If white women are loyal to the left but the left scorns them, they are in an abusive relationship. Here is a mental health organization’s description, of an abusive relation. As you go down its checklist, it all fits:
The Left thinks it owns white women and can order them around. There is a whole genre of articles telling white women what to do:
“White Women: We Must Stop Being Amy Cooper”
“America is at its breaking point and white women still won’t stop frivolously calling police on black people”
“Shaming white people might stop some of them from calling 911 on us”
“White women need to be better allies to women of color”
“How White Women Can Be Better Black Lives Matter Allies”
“White Women Need to Check Their Privilege After the Women’s March”
The Left has never forgiven 53 percent of white women for voting for Mr. Trump in 2016. It latches on to this like a dumped lover who can’t get over an old text message.
“The 53 percent had once again sold out their sisters in the service of the patriarchy, an especially egregious sin in the wake of the #MeToo movement, which has exposed widespread sexual harassment and assault among powerful men in the workplace,” Washington Post reporter Vanessa Williams wrote in 2018. This particular “sell out” — which could have been anything — was the fact that a few white women senators voted to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
“[A] a vocal segment of women of color, especially black feminists, are saying, hold up, pump the brakes,” The Undefeated writer Lonnae O’Neal said in a 2016 article called “The 53 percent issue. ”While white feminists are issuing all-hands-on-deck calls to stand against a Trump presidency, these women say, they haven’t worked hard enough to even win over a majority of their own ranks.”
Vogue bitterly asked in 2018: “Why Do White Women Keep Voting for the GOP and Against Their Own Interests?” Journalists view white women as if they were unfaithful lovers.
Leftists love to insult white women. That is why the “Karen” and “Becky” slurs are so popular. Both are ways to bully white women. I wrote in June: “The ‘Karen’ meme normalizes contempt for white women. It stops whites from doing something when they see suspicious non-whites.” “Becky” is no different. Like an abusive lover, the Left insults whites and tries to make them submit.
Threats against white women are becoming more common. Miss Attiah’s tweets are just one example. More ominously, there could be legal penalties for white women who call the police on blacks. Amy Cooper, the “Central Park Karen” who called 911 on a black bird watcher in May, was charged with filing a false police report. She already had lost her job, suffered extreme harassment, and may be banned from Central Park for life.
San Francisco is considering a new law called the CAREN Act, which would criminalize “racially biased” 911 calls. The name stands for Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies and is inspired by the “Karen” meme. White women are clearly thought to be the problem.
Even a camera can be used to threaten white women. Last month, a black man in Seattle followed a white woman to her home after a traffic incident. He accused her of using the N-word and pulled out his phone to videotape her. The woman, realizing she could be the target of a video that could ruin her life, burst into tears and pleaded with her accuser that she was not racist. White women better get in line, or else.
Some white women even suffer physical violence from the Left. Rioters beat a disabled white woman on camera in Minneapolis in May. The mob cheered on the black attackers as they punched her and emptied a fire extinguisher into her face. The woman was reportedly trying to stop a black mob from looting a Target.
A few days later, black rioters attacked a white woman who was riding her bike. A white man tried to fend off her attackers with a hockey stick. Rioters attacked him too.
Black looters beat an elderly white woman in Rochester, New York after she tried to stop them from attacking her store.
Rioters have surrounded white women in their cars and threatened them. A white mother in Fredericksburg, Virginia, begged police to rescue her and her child when rioters mobbed her car in June. The police did nothing.
It would be wrong to blame white women for any of this. Women are more conformist and submissive than men. They bow to what they think is powerful, respectable, and authoritative. It is not their fault that ideas that are destroying our country and our people have become authoritative. It is men — white men — who let that happen. Women will not change until we change.
Definitions of the Races
Jews Jews are basically living “Satan’s” living here on earth. They are the most vile and evil race on earth. Wherever Jews go, they are hated, and hated for good reason. They are human parasites that leech off of their host nations. Jews believe they are God’s chosen race and above all gentiles (non-Jews).
What Jews are good at Banking, stealing, corruption, murder of gentiles, destruction of nations/governments, porn, having giant noses, slander, lying and communism.
Greatest Achievements Child molestation, gay rights, communism, being kicked out of every European Nation at least once and killing Jesus Christ.
Blacks Blacks are the dumbest and most primitive people on earth. They are known by their laziness, stupidity and love of fried chicken. Wherever black people are, you find poverty, high crime rates and disease.
What blacks are good at Basketball, rape, interracial crime, eating watermelon, not working, stealing cars, robbing liquor stores, drinking malt liquor and collecting welfare.
Greatest Achievements Spreading Aids, cannibalism, Jessie Owens winning a race, poverty and the lowest IQ among all races.
Asians Asians are best known for all looking alike and having the smallest penises on earth. When not eating dogs and cats, they find time to watch porn anime and ways to look white. When not playing online video games, they are known to take 500 pictures a day.
What Asians are good at Over populations, mass murder of each other, bombing subways, controlling the dog and cat population by eating them and copying everything the white race does. They also own massage parlors that give happy endings.
Greatest Achievements Surviving two atomic bomb blasts, mass suicides during World War II, bad karaoke and making 1,235 food dishes with rice.
Muslims Muslims are the terroristic Semitic-cousins of Jews. The only difference is the fact Muslims will actually hold jobs which require more than corruption. Muslims are best known by their horrible sounding language, ugly women and hatred of Jews.
What Muslims are good at Blowing shit up, hijacking planes, forming terrorist cells, killing women and children, hating white culture but using our ideas and giving us the fake religion of Islam.
Greatest Achievements 9/11, selling cheap knock off cell phone accessories at flea markets, using Western Technology while complaining about Western Culture and killing Jews.
American Indians American Indians are a savage mongrel race. Like blacks, they constantly complain about the past and how the white man owes them. American Indians can be found drunk at any given casino. When not rain-dancing, they are drunk.
What American Indians are good at Chain smoking, being drunk, owning casinos, rain-dancing, living in the past, blaming others for their primitive ways and using their heritage to gain free government assistance.
Greatest Achievements Losing to the white man, popcorn, suing professional sports teams with Indian mascots and testing out smallpox blankets.
Mexicans Mexicans are a mongrel race best known for the destroying the beauty of the European Language known as Spanish. They are a fat race with hairy women. They stink and only real trade is picking fruit or drug trafficking.
What Mexicans are good at Illegally crossing borders, underground tunnels, roofing, women having facial hair, having babies, making tacos and wearing hot pants.
Greatest Achievements Destroying the Spanish Language, Pedro from Napoleon Dynamite, Dora the Explorer, being shot by border patrol and prison gangs.
All of the Jews in the US Senate want gun control.
All of the Jews in the US Senate fund Zionism.
The leftist Jews and leftist Jew lovers here on Al Jazeera read the Jew York Times and believe the Jew economics of the Paul Krugman Jew and the Thomas Friedman Jew.
Then there is the ROSENBERG Jew, is it just coincidence the ROSENBERGS started the nuclear arms race by giving the Jew Soviets their first atomic bomb?
Jew lover Belen Fernandez idolizes the Friedman Jew from the Jew York Times in her byline.
There is also a smattering of the Wasserman Jew once in a while, who slobbers all over Sodom Hussein Obama and every leftist pet cause coming from uber-Jew George Soros and Goldman-Sachs.
And what about the mayor jew king Bloomberg of Jew York city?
Or Ben Jew Bernanke printing all that money for their Jew bank friends?
And Hollywood is controlled by Jews who make all the filthy pornography.
BUT LET US NOT FORGET ALL OF THE MISOGYNIST SEX TRAFFICKING OF WOMEN IN ISLAM AND EUROPE...
AND THE RAPES OF WOMEN IN INDIA...
MEN ARE THE REASON FOR ALL OF THE WARS IN THE WORLD.
[Context: referring to an anti-harassment/bullying commercial by razor company Gillette]
The #Gillette commercial is the product of mainstream radicalized feminism & emblematic of Cultural Marxism.
STOP [Clapping emoji] PERVERTING [Clapping hands] MASCULINITY.
LET LITTLE BOYS WRESTLE.
Despite what Lena Dunham tells you, women are not into beta males & men are not into chicks w/ armpit hair.
Blacks kill 2x as man whites as whites kill black, annually.
We commit 85% of all violent crimes, 50% of all murders.
Over 90% of blacks killed by homicide are killed by other blacks.
BUT LET’S KEEP LYING TO BOTH OURSELVES AND THE PUBLIC & KEEP BLAMING RACISM.
We need to stop calling them liberals and begin referring to them as exactly what they are: American Communists that wish to partake in the destruction of Western civilization.
The Main Stream Media is having a field day with this supposed "White Supremacist" yet the Cabal seems to have missed one key topic in the "narrative"...not one word about "Jews" in his 74 page manifesto and not one swastika on his weapons. Very odd indeed.
The manifesto can be read here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5770516-The-Great-Replacement-New-Zealand-Shooter.html (sorry, link has been 404'd, working to find another one)
Nothing about Jews, but the shooter is sure to say "“Remember, lads, subscribe to PewDiePie,” before he starts his massacre. Odd? Well, maybe not so odd, depending on who put this guy up to this, considering PewDiePie is a Conservative Christian "Extremist" with the LARGEST FOLLOWING ON YOUTUBE. Seems perfect, if you're trying to frame a particular group of people. (This one reminds me of Benghazi, when they blame the attack on our embassy on a Youtube video.)
Read More Here:
According to his "manifesto," the one person who ultimately inspired him to commit such violence is none other than Candace Owens. Of course, he makes it a point to say that some of her ideas are far too extreme for his tastes. "Far too extreme" for someone that shoots approximately 100 people and writes a 74 page manifesto? Do they expect us to believe this?
Another weird "co-incidence":
Linwood, Christchurch was location of shooting.
Lin Wood is Covington lawyer suing CNN for $250million
The shooter chose to post on 8chan, alerting everyone to his shooting spree minutes before he began. Yes, the very same board where Qanon posts. Another "co-coincidence"?
And...we're still waiting to find out who this guy is, published in New Zealand media in connection to the shooting, but not the suspect arraigned in court.
And then there's this post from Reddit:
shooter was a personal trailer for 2 years after school. Leaves 2011 to "travel overseas".... 7 year gap who knows where he is..... Posts from the facebook of a Hotel in Islamabad with a picture Says how amazing and wonderful this muslim country is and the people Hotel owned by Shia muslims connected to Nizari people... a little over 6 months later appears in christchurch a small NZ town of a little over 300k people a small town that has had multiple White kiwis become jihadis, travel to yemen and get killed by US drones https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-04/preacher-denies-australian-killed-in-yemen-was-radicalised-in-nz/5500604 the same small town another kiwi teen was radicalized into a Jihadi and planned a mass killing before being arrested https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/101480988/kiwi-teenager-radicalised-online-planned-mass-killing-in-christchurch-for-allah the same small town that a large mossad operation had been operating in for who knows how many years https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/8649223/Mossad-spy-ring-unearthed-because-of-Christchurch-earthquake.html then this guy goes into mosque and shoots up a bunch of Sunni the SAME DAY the high ranking pakistani intelligence operative working in Islamabad in the region the shooter visited last year is SUICIDED https://www.news18.com/news/world/former-pakistan-intel-operative-found-dead-under-mysterious-circumstances-in-islamabad-2067671.html
Well, my final word is this shooting was a wet dream for American media. It strikes me as very odd that the shooter has so much anger over what has happened in other countries, yet although he traveled Europe and Pakistan, he decided to shoot up a Mosque at "CHRISTchurch"
Ides of March: Satanists (globalists) celebrate by bringing "blood to the alter", what better place to do this than at "Christ Church"?
Jewish Dennis Prager Talks Amount Managing Your Emotions After Being Called a Nazi
Dennis Prager is one of those rare charismatic Jews. Most Jews are repulsive and uncharismatic, literal caricatures out of Seinfeld or something. The one Jew with a similar countenance to Prager that comes to mind is the late Stan Lee of Marvel Comics, who was genuinely likable.
It’s like a Jewish superpower to not be repulsive, so he is somewhat interesting to watch.
For those who don’t know, Prager runs “Prager U,” which is a Jewish right-wing YouTube operation. To give you an idea where they are, they recently hired the black white nationalist Candace Owens after she left Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA.
Although he is less known than many shills, he is one of the key ideological figureheads of the fake, controlled opposition right-wing. He has been a Jewish activist his entire life, and began his career in the 1970s by speaking on the plight of Jews in the USSR and lobbying for them to be allowed to flee in mass numbers to the West, and America in particular. He wrote a book about how Judaism is an ethical religion, and preached morality, becoming known as the “Jewish Billy Graham” – this is despite the fact that he is pro-abortion. I have no specific reason to doubt that he believes as he says he believes with regards to his religious opposition to secular Judaism, and his dislike of homosexuals and Moslems, but all this means is that he is a Zionist shill, who is able to use some overlapping moral principles with Christians to force a Jewish agenda on them. He was #NeverTrump until Donald Trump got the Republican nomination, at which point he endorsed him, but said he was his “17th choice out of 17 candidates.”
Right-wing Jewish shills like Prager are dangerous because of the way they mix truths – sometimes very good truths – with lies and Jewish shilling. It is a magnificent art, this ability to start with something that people instinctively understand as true, and then use a kind of anti-Socratic method to lead people into believing a lie. This group of fake right-wing Jewish shills is much more dangerous than any lunatic leftist, and Prager is among the worst of them, both because of his charisma and the skill with which he uses the anti-Socratic method.
And yet, Prager is now being called a Nazi, along with his tribesfellow Ben Shapiro and the shabbos goy shill Jordan Peterson.
In his latest “fireside chat,” Prager responded to being called a Nazi, and talked about how he deals with this sort of thing. I was interested, because I am also called a Nazi – much more often than Jew Prager, at least thus far – as a way to insult me and claim that nothing I say matters because I am evil.
On the point of whether I am a Nazi or not – that is entirely irrelevant, because this is only being used as an insult. It is used against me in the same way it is used against the Jew Prager – simply to dismiss what I am saying. There is no definition of this word in the media – it just means “evil white man.”
I do not consider myself to be a “Nazi” in the way I am referred to as such, because this definition – or lack thereof – being used by the Jewish media has no meaning. I believe that Adolf Hitler was a great man who has been massively maligned and lied about by the Jewish establishment, I believe that Mein Kampf is among the most important books ever written and I believe that the National Socialists promoted a lot of common sense ideas. But I simply consider myself a nationalist and a traditionalist, and believe that my respect for Hitler and the NSDAP fits into that framework.
Hitler is, in my view, one of the many great Christian leaders of the European people.
Regrettably, Prager’s talk had to do with how to personally manage being insulted, not how to respond politically to these types of defamatory insults. He said: “I don’t let the insults go to my heart and I don’t let the compliments go to my head.” That is, to be fair, good enough advice, and advice that I would also give anyone. I don’t have a problem managing my emotions, and people hating me is actually a kind of fuel for me, as it drives my internal burning desire for revenge. And I’m not prone to pridefulness either, as I believe that my work is only going to be good if I am constantly, scathingly self-critical.
But sure, it’s good personal advice for a public figure.
He also says that the only thing that actually bothers him is being misquoted. And I agree with that, absolutely. The HuffPo has taken to printing literal fake quotes from me, and has refused to stop when I asked them to, actually continuing to fabricate more quotes while publicly acknowledging that I had asked them to stop. That was the angriest I’ve ever been on the internet.
However, what I was looking for here was some kind of Jewish strategy for politically managing these insults, and turning them around on the people making them. I have generally used the “agree and amplify” method of saying “yes, I am a Nazi and I plan to masturbate all Jews to death and when I am dictator, I will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law any wolves who hide you in their caves and feed you if you escape my masturbation machines.”
But I’m always looking for new ideas.
I should have known better than to think I’d get any from a fake right-wing Jewish shill. The only Jewish ideas that are ever interesting are the ones from radically honest Jews who forward their agenda with brutality, such as Saul Alinsky.
Just for the record, after saying the obviously true – though simplistic to the point of being almost useless, like something out of the Berenstain Bears (also Jewish) – thing about dealing with insults and praise, Prager went on to talk about how trannies should be respected and treated like the sex they claim to be.
Because of course.
Because Dennis Prager is most definitely not a Nazi.
He is of his father the devil, and the lusts of his father he will do. His father was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
Those with eyes can see the curse of his father written on his face.
Sandy Rios says that when progressives criticize white supremacy, what they’re really criticizing is conservative Christianity. Rios works as the American Family Association’s director of governmental affairs and has been present at conservative events like the Values Voter Summit and the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).
On this morning’s episode of “Sandy Rios in the Morning” on American Family Radio, Rios argued that people who speak out against white supremacy in the United States aren’t actually talking about white supremacy, but rather they are secretly attacking conservative Christians. Rios also claimed that comparing President Trump to a Nazi is unfounded because the Nazis also killed some white people along with the millions of Jews they murdered in a genocide.
“It’s not about your skin color and when they go further and compare President Trump to Nazis and their white racism, it’s really silly because, remember, the Nazis killed thousands, hundreds of thousands, of people, but guess what? They were white,” Rios said. “The Nazis were Aryan supremacists. They had a certain superhuman race they wanted to develop and most white people did not qualify.”
She continued, “So when the left is talking about white supremacism, they’re talking about the roots of this country. They’re talking about Christianity. They’re talking about hard work, about capitalism and free-market values. They’re talking about everything that has made America what it is. That’s what they mean.”
Rios went on to cite examples of left-of-center people criticizing racist and controversial remarks made by conservative activist Candace Owens to make her point.
“It may seem as though the hatred is focused on the president, but as I have said to you before, it is really focused on us—those of us that love this country, even if you don’t support Trump fully but you love the Constitution, you love the founders, you believe in Jesus—you are an object of their wrath.”
Rios made a similar argument in 2017 when she argued that the term “alt-right”—the label the white supremacist movement fixated to itself in the run-up to the 2016 election—was coined to denigrate conservatives, especially those who speak “in the name of Jesus.”
BREAKING: Trump is proposing a rule allowing federally funded homeless shelters to turn away trans and gender non-conforming people — in the midst of the highest unemployment rates our country has seen in decades.
BREAKING: Trump is proposing a rule not to allow MEN into WOMEN’s homeless shelters, because MEN who self-identify as women, are not actually WOMEN, just as children who self-identify as mermaids, are not actually fish.
PROTECT VULNERABLE WOMEN FROM WOKE CULTURE.
Republican state lawmakers in Ohio are refusing to back a bill that would repeal the state’s “spousal exemption” for marital rape.
Democratic state Rep. Greta Johnson told the Akron Beacon Journal that she first introduced HB 234 in 2015 because marital rape is legal in Ohio as long as the rapist uses no force or threat of force, meaning a husband could legally drug and rape his wife.
“As a former prosecutor, I would argue that you could still try to prosecute under the forced rape statute, but unfortunately drugging and raping your spouse in Ohio is not illegal,” Johnson explained.
The 2015 bill died in committee with no Republican support. Johnson blamed the failure on partisanship and opposition to a provision that dropped the 20-year statute of limitations on rape and sexual assault.
Johnson filed the bill again on Friday, this time dropping the provision that removes the statute of limitations. But no Republican lawmaker has stepped forward to co-sponsor the bill.
Brad Miller, a spokesperson for Republican House Speaker Cliff Rosenberger, told the Beacon Journal that the Speaker had not had a chance to review the bill.
“Most of this is really early in the process in terms of what might happen next,” Miller said.
The White race’s intelligence and behavior has been under intense selective pressure since late medieval times. These new environmental forces significantly increased White resilience in the face of adversity. The first of these was the Black Death that ravaged Europe from 1347 to 1351. As one of the most catastrophic pandemics in world history, it killed off one-third of Europe’s population. The evidence of bioarchaeology, drawn from skeletal analysis of burial remains from “Black Death” cemeteries, reveals that far from being random, the plague was very selective in its choice of victims (DeWitte, 2014). The weak and the elderly were at increased risk of infection. Given the strong correlation between poor health and IQ, the Whites who survived were much stronger, healthier and smarter than ever before. The dearth of peasant labor led to an increase in wages, rising living standards and the invention of labor-saving devices. This greater wealth and prosperity liberated many from the common drudgery of daily life. A century after the Black Death, the Renaissance scaled even greater heights of intellectual and artistic achievement.
The 17th century colonization of North America also subjected Whites to strong selective pressure. The first Englishmen to have disembarked on American soil had survived religious persecution in England as Puritans objecting to the “Roman idolatry” of Anglican ritual; they had survived the perilous transAtlantic voyage, unaffected by typhus or scurvy. In New England, the Puritans still had to contend with disease, the harsh winters and the “merciless Indian savages” that lay hiding in the primeval forests of the eastern seaboard. If the weak and unintelligent managed to survive the voyage, they would eventually be killed off by starvation or Indian tomahawk. This pattern of eugenic selection affected all English settlers, including those motivated by purely secular and commercial interests. By the end of the colonial period, the Anglo-Saxon in the Americas had emerged as one of the finest and most evolved specimens of the White race.
The purifying effects of eugenic selection had rapidly accelerated the evolution of Homo sapiens in Europe and North America: the fittest White men had always left behind the most offspring, but after the ravages of bubonic plague and the hardships of American colonization, their broods became larger, healthier and more intelligent. White men of lesser ability, if they were lucky enough to find mates, typically left behind few descendants, with fewer still managing to survive past childhood.
A significant increase in the population of intelligent Whites inevitably led to a rising per capita rate of innovation. This peaked in 1873, during the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901), but declined rapidly after that (Huebner, 2005). With the new science and technology, the White man was able to raise incomes, improve public health and increase longevity across the Western world. Eugenic selection for higher IQ made it possible for the White man to develop more sophisticated military technology. This far surpassed anything that had ever been developed by the ancient Greeks and Romans or even non-Whites. By century’s end, approximately 84% of the earth’s surface was controlled by the colonial empires of Western Europe. Intellectual and creative development had scaled such heights that Europe even gave birth to a race of intellectual supermen. These were the Victorian polymaths, who numbered among their ranks the colorful Sir Richard Francis Burton (1821-1890). He was a man who excelled at every subject that commanded his undivided attention. He was a brilliant writer, scholar, explorer, geographer, translator, diplomat and swordsman. A master linguist, he spoke an astonishing 40 languages and dialects fluently. This period of continuous White evolutionary development wasn’t to last forever. By 1914, the golden age of White intellectual and creative superiority had come to an end.
II: Western Intellectual Decline from Late 19th Century to Present
The general intelligence of the Western industrialized nations has declined since late 19th century, according to a meta-analysis of over a dozen reaction time (RT) studies. A cognitive, but not an economic or thermodynamic, limit has apparently been reached. There are now fewer individuals with the intelligence to solve complex mathematical and engineering problems, which is why the rate of innovation has significantly decreased since 1873. “Genetic g” - g-factor in the absence of gene environment interaction - has decreased by 14 IQ points over the course of a century, at least in the Anglophone nations of the UK, USA, Canada and Australia. This means a decrease of 1.23 IQ points per decade (Woodley et al., 2013). To eliminate the possibility of overinflated RT latencies because of hardware and software lags (Woods et al., 2015), the meta-analytic findings were adjusted for lag time. The result was that the Victorians were still faster (and smarter) than modern Western populations (Woodley et al., 2015).
Measures of vocabulary, relatively insensitive to environmental influence because of greater overall gsaturation and heritability rate, provided additional evidence of superior Victorian intelligence. A study tracked WORDSUM item frequencies over the course of 150 years. For this, a database that stored 5.9 million texts from the 1500s to the present was used. The most difficult and therefore the most highly g-loaded WORDSUM items exhibited sharper declines in historical usage since mid-19th century, consistent with declines in “genetic g” observed among Western populations (Woodley et al., 2015).
After decades of “massive IQ gains,” cognitive reversals were observed in Norway (Sundet et al, 2004), Denmark (Teasdale & Owen, 2008), the Netherlands (Woodley & Meisenberg, 2013) and elsewhere. In one study, genes associated with educational attainment and cognitive ability had declined in frequency across birth cohorts in an Icelandic population. It was estimated that a loss of 0.3 IQ points per decade would substantially affect Iceland if allowed to continue for centuries (Kong et al., 2017). James Flynn, discoverer of the eponymous Flynn effect, has acknowledged the reversal of cognitive gains in certain Western countries, especially those of Scandinavia. At a 2017 conference hosted by the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR), he admitted: “I have no doubt that there has been some deterioration of genetic quality for intelligence since late Victorian times.” Flynn has projected substantial losses of about 6 or even 7 IQ points for Scandinavia over a 30 year period. Such a reversal in intelligence would have catastrophic effects on the societies and economies of Scandinavia, now being flooded by hostile elites with Third World “migrants.”
A relevant question is: “If the post-WWII consensus acknowledges the existence of massive IQ gains over the last century, how does one explain cognitive reversal in the most industrialized nations?” This phenomenon is known as Cattell’s paradox and its solution is Woodley’s co-occurrence model. Although phenotypic intelligence has increased since WWII, genotypic intelligence has decreased. The anti-Flynn effect is really a “Jensen effect” because it has resulted in losses on psychometric g.
III: The Role of Dysgenic Selection in Western Intellectual Decline
Mass “immigration” from low-IQ regions of the globe, such as the Middle East, South Asia and Africa, have no doubt contributed to declines in the average intelligence of the West. In one recent study (Woodley et al., 2017), Third World “immigration” was associated with IQ declines in 13 different nations. High levels of Third World “immigration” are always significant predictors of Western cognitive decline; its most pronounced effects are on IQ subtest batteries with the highest g-loadings. Nevertheless, Third World “immigration” does not fully account for dysgenic selection among Western populations. Declines in genotypic intelligence occurred long before the advent of Third World “immigration,” which only partially explains the Western world’s declining IQ.
The greater fecundity of intelligent Whites, compared to the unintelligent, had always been the norm, especially since the 1400s. This changed during the Industrial Revolution; more intelligent Whites delayed having children until later in life, through a combination of abstinence and contraception, to further their educational aspirations and develop their innate potential. Medical breakthroughs significantly improved general health and nutrition, which prolonged human lifespans. This allowed less intelligent Whites to survive childhood and have significantly more children than those who were more intelligent. The rise of social welfare liberalism in the 20th century merely exacerbated this trend. As Western governments progressively taxed their wealthiest and most intelligent citizens, their wealth was unfortunately redistributed to less industrious and less intelligent members of the White race, who squandered the money as they multiplied recklessly.
More recent studies have shed further light on the negative correlation between intelligence and fertility. In one study, the higher the intelligence and socioeconomic status of adolescents, the lower their likelihood of having offspring. This dysgenic effect was more true of females than males, indicating that women become choosier the more wealth and status they accumulate (Reeve et al., 2013). Among adults, a negative correlation between intelligence and odds of parenthood was discovered; every 15 point increase in a woman’s childhood IQ would decrease a woman’s odds of parenthood by about 20% (Kanazawa, 2014). The female role in the transmission of intelligence is a substantial one because the genes for intelligence are X-chromosomal; if more intelligent women since the late Victorian period have had less children than the unintelligent, one can only expect a gradual decline in the national intelligence of Western populations.
Analysis of a large genealogical database revealed that Iceland’s national IQ had decreased over time because more intelligent Icelanders were having less children. Although IQ declines per decade were small, statistical significance is attained when viewed from an evolutionary timescale. Dysgenic fertility may potentially undermine Icelandic economy and society within a few centuries, unless it is reversed (Kong et al., 2017). Polygenic scores, which capture selection against g (such as dysgenic fertility or “immigration”), are the most significant predictors of the century-long decline in “heritable g” (Woodley et al., 2018). The “neurotoxin hypothesis,” like all environmental explanations, fails to adequately predict temporal trends in general intelligence because cognitive ability is under much stronger genetic than environmental control. The worst environmental deprivations (i.e. severe malnutrition) or the most costly and ambitious environmental interventions rarely, if ever have a lasting effect on heritable g.
Most experts in intelligence, cognitive ability and student achievement now attribute the anti-Flynn effect to dysgenic fertility, Third World “immigration” and worsening educational standards in Western countries; in contrast, they are far more unanimous among each other in attributing environmental causation to the Flynn effect, in striking agreement with Woodley’s co-occurrence model (Rindermann et al., 2016). Based on the evidence, Western intellectual decline is largely caused by a negative IQfertility gradient, with Third World “immigration” becoming an increasingly significant contributor as time goes on.
IV: The Road to “Idiocracy”
Nobel laureate William Shockley proposed a Voluntary Sterilization Bonus Plan (1972). He presented this as a “thought experiment.” This would be open to all members of the American public, regardless of “sex, race or welfare status.” For each IQ point under 100, the recipient was to be given $1000, as long as he or she was willing to undergo vasectomy or tubal ligation. This was not an original proposal, as it had been first suggested over 40 years ago by American journalist and scholar H.L. Mencken, albeit in a rather humorous context. What all of these proposals neglect, and what modern eugenicists have failed to acknowledge, is the obvious sex differential in contributions to dysgenic fertility, probably because of the natural sympathy that men typically have for the opposite sex.
The low-IQ male, unless he is among the 20% of males considered physically attractive, is permanently excluded from the sexual market. This is because of his lifelong inability to acquire the material resources that allow him to compensate for his genetic inferiority. On the other hand, the low-IQ female poses a far greater threat to the mental hygiene of Western populations, by virtue of her role as sexual selector. For the low-IQ female, there will always be large numbers of reasonably attractive males willing to satisfy her many sexual and financial needs. If the low-IQ male must be handsome or rich, the low-IQ female must only be of childbearing age if she wishes to attract a mate of fairly decent genetic quality. The Industrial Revolution brought with it substantial improvements in public health and nutrition, making it easier for low-IQ females to survive childhood, only to breed as much as possible throughout their reproductive years.
When, in 1869, Sir Francis Galton made his famous scientific prediction of declining Western intelligence based on anecdotal observation of changing Victorian demographics, what he really observed was more low-IQ females than ever before surviving childhood to satisfy their instinctive desire for maternity. This trend has continued without interruption to the present, making low-IQ females the primary driving force behind the dysgenic fertility that has resulted in declining general intelligence in Western industrialized nations. No successful eugenic policy can exist without taking this into full account. In order for Dr. Shockley’s proposal to have made any sense from an evolutionary perspective, the bonus for females should have been quadrupled or even quintupled for each IQ point under 100.
Into this volatile mixture was added feminism, a pernicious ideology that grants both unrestricted individual autonomy and reproductive choice to women who should not be allowed to breed for eugenic reasons. In recognizing that all women have the same rights, feminism reveals itself to be just as dangerous as the Third World “immigration” promoted by hostile elites. By encouraging low-IQ females to engage in promiscuity, march in “slut walks,” wear “pussy hats,” and breed prolifically - while high-IQ females delay parenthood because of their educational aspirations - feminism has merely accelerated the decline in general intelligence among Western populations, already well under way since the Industrial Revolution. As Whites get dumber, their “Western uniqueness,” including their high intelligence, creativity and ability to produce more geniuses than any other race of people, will disappear with them. This radical transformation of the underlying genetic structure of Western populations could take place within less than a 100 years. Few people recognize the fragility of Western intellectual gains because of selective pressures exerted by the Black Death in Medieval Europe and the 17th century colonization of North America. By undermining Western mental and racial hygiene, feminism threatens to return Whites to the way things were before the agricultural revolution of the Neolithic age.
Helmuth Nyborg, extrapolating from present trends and projecting them into the future, allows us to better visualize in concrete terms the post-apocalyptic scenario that awaits Western civilization (2011). He shows what happens when a racially homogeneous society like Denmark, with a population of over 5 million, is subjected to both “Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (IRDS), referring to the preservation and multiplication of the genetically disadvantaged, and “External Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (ERDS), in reference to “super-fertile” Third World “replacement migration.”
When both internal and external relaxation are combined, “Double Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (DRDS) is produced, a clear and unobstructed path to Western “idiocracy” in Denmark. By 2072, ethnic Danes will be reduced to 60% of the population, from a high of 97% in 1979; minority status will be reached by 2085. In 1979, Danish phenotypic IQ was 98, but by 2072, it is 93, having dropped 5 IQ points in less than a century. As national IQ decreases, Denmark will be gradually transformed into a Latin American “banana republic.” Ethnic Danes, demoralized by feminism and social welfare legislation, will have no choice but to acquiesce to the destruction of their own country. Significant damage to the economy and educational infrastructure are to be expected; a 5 point drop in Danish IQ means a 35% reduction in the nation’s GDP. Democracy will inevitably become unsustainable as average national IQ plummets below 90; it will be replaced by the authoritarian political culture and religious dogmatism found in Middle Eastern, African and Latin American societies.
Belief that “more White babies” are the answer to dysgenic fertility among Whites is just as dangerous and genocidal as the liberal belief that Third World “replacement migration” is “cultural enrichment.” Since low-IQ females leave behind more offspring than those of high IQ, more White births would reduce high-IQ females to an “endangered species.” This would intensify the “Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” already occurring in Western populations. As Whites “devolve,” they will no longer be able to maintain their own Western industrialized societies. A demographic transition of such magnitude would transform Western Europe and North America, the Occidental heartland, into a cultural and biological extension of the Third World. Since women are loyal to wealth and power, but not race, one can expect genocidal levels of miscegenation between White females of low intelligence and the non-White foreigners who have dispossessed Whites and conquered the West.
To reverse the process of dysgenic selection, the White man must do three things:
He must get rid of the hostile elite.
He must forcibly repatriate all Third World “migrants,” including their descendants. Forced “remigration” is not an unrealistic policy; mass population transfers have been successfully carried out before, i.e. deportation of Germans, 1944-50, from Eastern and Central European countries to Germany and Austria.
If selective pressures in medieval Europe and colonial America led to the steady eugenic improvement of Western populations, making it possible for them to conquer 84% of the globe’s surface, only their re-emergence will reverse the dysgenic selection that has bedeviled the White race since the mid-19th century. This can only be accomplished through a rigorous application of classical eugenic principles.
If the White race is to survive, only its strongest and most intelligent members must be prepared for the harsh Darwinian struggle that lies ahead. Wasting precious resources on mental and genetic defectives is sheer pathological altruism. Race-conscious Whites have a collective interest in raising healthy and intelligent offspring, but no such interest can exist when it comes to those who are weak and unintelligent. They are “life unworthy of life”; even they would not consent to such a truncated and meager existence if given full possession of their normal faculties. From a White nationalist perspective, to bring such children into the world is selfish and morally irresponsible; they impose unnecessary fiscal burdens on Whites and use up resources that are better invested elsewhere.
The race-conscious White man is faced with a dilemma: because of liberal elite hostility to his own ethnic genetic interests, any program of eugenic enhancement would be outlawed under the current totalitarian leftist order; at the same time, he cannot simply wait out the elite-managed decline of Western civilization. In less than a few generations, most of his race may become drooling mental defectives, if they haven’t already miscegenated themselves out of existence into the burgeoning mass of Third World “migrants” who now infest his homeland. If he must take action, he must take it now, otherwise all is lost.
Race-conscious Whites must abandon all leftist-controlled urban areas to “live off the grid.” By colonizing relatively unpopulated areas of North America and Western Europe, the White man will return to a rustic existence, filling the countryside, the mountains, the forests, the tundra with Whites only settlements, similar to the Boer-only settlement of Orania in South Africa. Living the way his ancestors did centuries ago will ensure that no Third World “immigrant” follows him into the mountains or the wilderness. Self-imposed hardship will further intensify Darwinian selective pressure on Whites, jumpstarting the process of natural eugenic enhancement, just as it did during the early colonization of the Americas. Once race-conscious Whites have become sufficiently numerous, they must embark on a program of state-sponsored eugenics. This will be used to strengthen the White population until they are able to wrest control of North America and Western Europe from the hostile elites and their army of greedy “migrants.”
The new ethnostate will be constitutionally grounded on Aristotelian political philosophy and neoDarwinian biology; it will be a meritocracy based on eugenic principles. Eugenics, the scientific ideological core of the new White nationalism, is easily reconciled with the aristocratic political science of Aristotle; both are concerned with the development and formation of the best possible citizen, one along genetic and the other along characterological lines. Aristotelian philosophy is based on a linear hierarchical conception of reality; this overlaps with the dominance hierarchies of the animal kingdom and of all human socio-political organization. Furthermore, the capacity for superior moral development is improved substantially by superior genes. In an Aristotelian political order informed by eugenic principles, the state would ensure that all citizens have both the mental and physical capacity to live the good life. Mandatory genetic screening would be one of the conditions of citizenship; those at risk of transmitting hereditary diseases or conditions, such as criminality or low IQ, would undergo compulsory eugenic sterilization. Only the best and most virtuous citizens, the biologically and intellectually superior “aristoi” or natural-born aristocrats, would be the ones allowed total freedom of action in the political sphere.
In the ethnostate, the aristoi of the White race will determine who must give birth and who must be sterilized. These men are not petty bureaucrats, but aristocrats selected on the basis of health and IQ. Their sole task is the promotion of White racial survival, whatever the cost. For those who believe eugenic sterilization is barbarous and cruel, allowing the birth of children who suffer from mental retardation or cystic fibrosis is much, much worse. For this reason, only the healthiest, high-IQ females will be allowed to breed, even being massively incentivized to do so. Encouraging the natural increase of healthy, intelligent Whites, at the expense of the low IQ and genetically unfit, is the most White nationalist thing a White man can do for his race.
Some will necessarily object: “But state-sponsored eugenics will infringe on individual rights and freedoms!” This is a common, but groundless objection. The “right to procreate” is not an absolute. In 7 utilitarian ethics, rights are never ends in themselves; they exist to maximize the happiness of the greatest number and must be tempered by social obligation. Furthermore, not all men have the capacity for individual freedom. The Greek philosopher Aristotle recognized the existence of natural slavery because of the inability of some to reason autonomously, even though they may be responsive to reasoned instruction. Whether a man is free or not must be determined by his capacity to reason (for us, his IQ).
Legislation regulating some of the most intimate areas of our lives is hardly controversial; if we allow government to enforce this legislation, ostensibly in the interest of public safety, why not allow government to decide who gets to reproduce and who doesn’t? If the low IQ and genetically unfit are allowed to breed recklessly, as they do now, Western civilization will eventually be reduced to smoldering ruins. Unregulated breeding is far more dangerous than any black market specializing in the sale of illicit firearms or drugs. Society would be much safer if it allowed every citizen to acquire large arsenals of weapons without special licensing, but criminalized the marriage and procreation of the low IQ and genetically unfit.
If a large minority of race-conscious Whites emigrate, seceding from the leftist totalitarian state to independently pursue their own racial interests, reversal of dysgenic fertility and Third World “immigration” may be accomplished within a few generations. As race-conscious Whites strengthen their race through genetic enhancement, the totalitarian left will get weaker, forced to increasingly rely on low-IQ Whites and “migrants” for manpower. From their bases in the Pacific Northwest or Lapland, race-conscious Whites, stronger and more intelligent than ever before, would raid globalist-occupied territory, slowly enlarging their own dominions until the reconquest of North America and Western Europe has been completed. This is not without historical precedent. Medieval Spanish Christians, reduced to a small area of their own country, seized the emirates of Mohammedan Andalusia one by one, until the last emirate of Granada had been defeated, its Moorish inhabitants expelled from the Iberian peninsula in 1492.
Race-conscious Whites must live, think and breathe race, just as they did during the long and distinguished reign of Queen Victoria, when Whites were at the peak of their intellectual and artistic powers. In this age of drab multicultural uniformity, the White man’s race is his most formidable weapon, a thorn in the side of those who wish to replace him with the low IQ peasant masses of the Middle East, Africa, South Asia and Latin America. Nothing terrifies the hostile elites more than the prospect of encountering race-conscious White men bred for superior intellect and physical strength, able to aggressively pursue their own racial interests undeterred by elite and non-White hostility.
On Friday November 13, 2015 ISIS launched a terrorist attack in downtown Paris that resulted in 130 people killed. According to the media, this attack came without warning and was unprecedented. Initially, we thought that the date (having occurred on Friday the 13th) was the Illuminati's calling card. We've learned much more since then and have determined that Pixar movies had been warning us of the Paris attacks all along.
Pixar films such as "Toy Story", "Monsters University", "Ratatouille", and "Cars 2" contain a series of numbers, A113, which can be found throughout. The series often appears on license plates such as Mater's (rusty tow-truck from Cars) and Andy's mother's minivan (Toy Story and Toy Story 3). Those are just a couple of examples. In truth, A113 can be found all over the place in Pixar movies, so much to the point where the studio provided an "explanation" to the observant eye. They claimed that the series was the number of an old classroom used by many of the animators when they were training. That sounds plausible enough. However, it doesn't override the number's darker message.
A113 can be interpreted like this. Let's start with the "A" which also happens to be the first letter of the alphabet. The "A" can also represent "1" for that reason. This would alter the sequence to appear as 1113. Insert a slash between the numbers and you have 11/13, aka the date of the attacks.
Now, the skeptic will say that this is just a silly coincidence and that we here at IW are off our schizo meds. To them we say we're perfectly sane. In fact, we're saner than your average individual because we have freed ourselves from brainwashing. And we'd also like to add that we have more.
We're going to focus our attention now on the rusty tow-truck character from "Cars" and "Cars 2", Mater, voiced by Larry the Cable Guy. Mater happens to be one of the most likable Disney characters from the past decade whose license plate number is A113. In the first "Cars" film, the license plate appears mostly as just another subtle placement for the number. However, in "Cars 2" things become more serious.
For Pixar fans, "Cars 2" was a nightmare. The movie had a poor plot which focused more on Mater than Lightning McQueen (red race car voiced by Owen Wilson). When released, critics slammed it as a thinly veiled marketing blitz for toys and noted that it was Pixar's first bad movie. We here at IW know better.
The "Cars 2" storyline took the characters around the world and got them involved in an international espionage scheme. This plot was necessary in order to get Mater to Paris. Once in the French capital, the rusty tow-truck drove around flashing his A113 license plate. This was the moment when the numbers acquired real significance because Mater was there as a spy working to stop an international terror plot.
The "Cars 2" Paris scene was a warning. Mater's traversing the city in order to obtain information to save lives was really meant to tell us that something bad was going to happen in that city on November 13th, which it did four years after the film's release. As with other tragic events, we didn't heed the signals in time.
Jews are more evil, not smarter
I consider Jews are not stupid, ooo, no at all, if they are stupid they would not control us today, it would be other way! I consider that Jews are only pure evil and using this fact, they don't have any conscious about what is evil and what is good about humanity!!!
As Alfred Rosenberg sad, I don''t consider Jews are lower Race, I didn't sad Jews are Race at all!!!
Simply they are conscious that we are superior race and they want to destroy us so they can easy to control other sub-humans!
When you sad Jew, I don't imagine human been, I imagine devil! So, it is famous that devil is against humanity, against humanized and civilized world where White Race will be free from immigration!!!
We must realize, ZOG are not humans, they are pure evil for humanity and for Nature also, for Animals, for everything nice, health, they don't like good inventions, and just to remind, White man is only who invented good things, Jews just abuse this!!!
Eaten up with guilt, shame, fears and insecurities and obtaining, if he's lucky, a barely perceptible physical feeling, the male is, nonetheless, obsessed with screwing; he'll swim a river of snot, wade nostril-deep through a mile of vomit, if he thinks there'll be a friendly pussy awaiting him. He'll screw a woman he despises, any snaggle-toothed hag, and, further, pay for the opportunity. Why? Relieving physical tension isn't the answer, as masturbation suffices for that. It's not ego satisfaction; that doesn't explain screwing corpses and babies.
(FSTDT won the coin flip this time.)
How is it Cain was able to get a wife after he already left his home and went into the land of the East? It is suggested that Cain married a daughter of Adam and Eve and that incest was permissible at this early stage of human history. Nevertheless, prior to Cain’s departure no mention was made of Adam and Eve giving birth to any daughters, in fact, their third son Seth had not even been born yet (Genesis 4:25). If other sons of God existed, then it would explain where Cain got his wife in the land of the east.
Note too this verse: “And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.” Genesis 6:3. He also is flesh? Who else is flesh in this comparison?
The little word “also” is very instructive. The verse seems to indicate that God’s spirit attempted to govern the other races of “sons of God” but they were too flesh-driven; yet God had hoped to maintain a relationship with those of Adam’s seed and strove to do so for a long time, but gave up because Adam’s line “also” got corrupted by becoming too flesh-obsessed,and this due especially to their racial miscegenation.
12. Can a human being have an altered state of consciousness in which they experience a s*****l relationship with an angel/demon that seems real but is not literal? How can one tell the difference? Are angels/demons able to implant suggestive and potent imagery into human minds?
Ok, the “Discernment Group” is getting more and more sensational, lurid, and coarse with the types of questions they are asking. What is the “Discernment Group” planning on doing with all this information, are they going to attempt to write a “Kama-Sutra” for Nephilim? Yikes, I’ve had enough.
Of course, the ones who are promoting the Nephilim nonsense (that is, the alleged existence of invisible demons that try to impregnate women) are the ones to blame for inviting salacious questions of this nature. They are inventing a weird mythology that has nothing to do with reality.
The question I would ask is, if all these Nephilim babies have been born, then please show us the giants in the land (hint: go to an NBA game).
“There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” Genesis 6:4.
Notice: The giants arose “when” i.e., exactly when, meaning this was the cause, when the sons of God “came in unto” i.e., they copulated with the fair women, and “the same” i.e., the mulatto offspring that arose when this happened, i.e., because of this happening, then those offspring became the mighty men. The statement “and also after that” implies that the giants are these offspring since their first fathers would have died in the flood., i.e., the sons of God produced these initial offspring, some of which happened to be giants, and yet giants kept showing up in even after the flood, i.e., certain progeny identified with Ham see Deut 2:11, 20; 3:11-13, etc.
Does any of this mean that Blacks can’t get saved? Of course not, black souls certainly can be saved. In fact, one of the first New Testament gentiles saved was an Ethiopian, but take careful note he was a eunuch: “a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians” Acts 8:27. Saved men can come from all races at the present time because their souls are saved and they will get new bodies at the rapture. However, the line of Ham will not continue on into eternity; it will dead-end when those Black who survived the tribulation, and who are found worthy to enter the millennial kingdom, being allowed to enter, but only as eunuchs see, Matthew 19:12, Isaiah 56:4-5. (“there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts.” Zechariah 14:21; “Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.” Isaiah 14:21 (cf. Gen.4:17))
Fox News host Ainsley Earhardt wondered this week if the best way to deal with the 2016 presidential race was to “pray about it and God will pick the right candidate.”
On Tuesday’s edition of Fox & Friends, host Steve Doocy asked The View host Candace Cameron Bure what it would take to unite Republicans behind one candidate.
“I don’t know what it’s going to take,” Bure admitted. “But I’m an American and I hold conservative values, and I think at the end of the day, I realize I put my faith in Jesus Christ, not in any one person.”
She added: “And whoever becomes our candidate, our nominee and eventually our president, I will pray for them and support that they make the best decisions for our country.”
Earhardt pressed Bure about the role of religion in selecting a candidate.
“I know your faith is important to you as it is to many of us,” Earhardt said. “Do you feel like in this election, we just pray about it and give it to God? And God’s going to pick the right candidate?”
Bure, however, recommended that Christians should vote.
“I don’t know who I’m going to vote for at this point,” she insisted. “But I will pray about the decision of who I’ll vote for.”
[Comment under "Augustus Sol Invictus Arrested on Kidnapping Charges?"]
Being a race traitor wasn't enough?
lol. Latin people have Spanish blood you stupid shill. Most Hispanics in north america need to go for sure (especially illegals) but I'm not going to kick out every white person that has miscegenated. Especially those that have misigenated with people that have some European blood connections like latinos (many of whom have 75% plus Spanish ancestry). It's not any modern white persons fault that we are growing up in this degenerate Jewish globalist run hell hole that teaches us from birth that porn is cool and race mixing is cool and sodomy is cool. That's not Invictus's fault. Stop trying to get the alt right to purity spiral. Not going to work. You probably want us to kick Owen Benjamin out as well huh? He's got a latin wife. What about Derbyshire with the Asian wife? Do you really think we are that stupid that we would kick out intelligent and effective writers and propagandist out of our tent?
Can't wait until we can get the nuremberg laws in affect and breed you and your jew genes out. It will be a glorious day. You won't even be part of the people's community my friend. It will be some third world hell hole or Madagascar for you Jew. Good luck running your cons on birds, rocks and reptiles.
Rerun Article: Did Dinosaurs REALLY Evolve Into Birds?
I hope everyone had a terrific Harvest Day! As you might recall, last year I took part in the Nanowrimo (National Novel Writing Month) challenge, which requires me to write a 50,000-word novel during the month of November. I am doing this challenge again this year, so I will be posting quite a few rerun articles this month. Don't worry though, I'll pick articles from a little ways back.
Anyway, Thanksgiving will soon be upon us? Do you have any Thanksgiving traditions? If so, leave them in a comment below.
It is: 16 days till The Good Dinosaur's theatrical release
It is: 17 days till Thanksgiving
It is: 45 days till Christmas
In the Spotlight:
Again, nothing of note to share this week.
Topic of the Week by Christian Ryan
Did dinosaurs really evolve into birds? What does the fossil record actually reveal?
Every Thanksgiving, people all over the United States cook and serve the American turkey. Despite not being part of the first Thanksgiving, the turkey is a symbol for this holiday. But for many Americans, they aren't merely eating a bird they're actually eating a dinosaur! Evolutionists believe that all birds, including the turkey, descended from small, feathered theropod dinosaurs; to be more accurate, they actually believe that birds are dinosaurs. Such a claim, if true, would be a major problem for creationists. How should a creationist respond to such this idea? What's the truth behind this belief?
Is this delicious Thanksgiving entree the descendant of dinosaurs?
The idea that reptiles evolved into birds isn't new. Not long after renowned naturalist Charles Darwin published his book in 1859 called On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life . . . it's easy to see why most people just call it The Origin of Species. In 1860, a feather was discovered fossilized in Germany and the species of which the feather belonged to was called Archaeopteryx. In 1863, Sir Richard Owen (the inventor of the name “dinosaur” and a creationist) described an entire skeleton of the creature; the fossils revealed a relatively small creature, with feathered and clawed wings, teeth and a long bony tail. In 1869, biologist Thomas Henry Huxley, often considered “Darwin's Bulldog” declared the animal as the missing link between reptiles specifically dinosaurs and birds. Ever since, most evolutionary scientists cling to the idea that theropod dinosaurs evolved into birds.
The similarities between dinosaurs like Compsognathus and birds led Huxley to believe that dinosaurs evolved into birds.
Before we go any farther, we must understand both perspectives of the origin of birds: the creation perspective and the evolutionary perspective. Let's look at them both now. Most evolutionists believe that sometime between the early to late Jurassic Period, about 201-145 million years ago, the scales of small theropod dinosaurs began evolving into fur-like proto-feathers for warmth. After millions of years of evolution, these proto-feathers evolved to be firmer and longer; dinosaurs began using their longer feathers for display purposes, perhaps to attract mates. Evolutionists are unsure as to how the power of flight came about. Some evolutionists believe these feathered dinosaurs were tree-climbers and began using their feathered limbs to glide through the trees; others believe they developed the power of flight from the ground up, using their proto-wings to increase their leaps into the air, perhaps after prey. Either way, these dinosaurs eventually were able to get airborne and were now technically birds.
An early conception of "proto-birds" from 1916.
What does the Bible say about the evolution of birds? Well, it says God created all the flying creatures on the Fifth day of the Creation week, 6,000 years ago, the day before He created dinosaurs.
“And God created...every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good...And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.” Genesis 1:21-23.
This is a major contradiction to the evolution story, which states that dinosaurs came about before birds. Meanwhile the Bible states that land animals dinosaurs included came after birds! And instead of evolving through the processes of natural selection and mutation like evolution teaches, birds appeared on earth fully-formed and ready for action.
Evolutionists commonly point to Archaeopteryx as being a transitional form between dinosaurs and birds.
Many evolutionists (specifically atheists) believe that there is too much evidence for evolution for creation to be true. I find it rather interesting how many evolutionists refuse to even consider creation an option; in fact, many will go as far as to say that creationists don't know science. I was browsing the internet and came across an article entitled Feathered Dinosaurs Drive Creationists Crazy by Brian Switek. “Oh, really?” I thought upon seeing this article; I was rather unimpressed by this evolutionist's attempt to denounce creationists. Curious, I read the article, expecting to find much criticism aimed at creationists. Much of the article was devoted to how our view of dinosaurs has changed over the years, but perhaps a quarter into the material, he talked about creationists and the “overwhelming evidence” that dinosaurs evolved into birds, in addition to his other criticisms about dinosaurs living with humans and dinosaurs living 6,000 years ago etc. He also spent a great deal of time talking about Answers in Genesis CEO Ken Ham and the Creation Museum. Here's an excerpt below:
“...dinosaurs with feathers are not welcome at Ham's amusement park [speaking of the Creation Museum]. Even though paleontologists have uncovered numerous dinosaurs with everything from bristles and fuzz to full-flight featherswhich document the evolution of plumage from fluff to aerodynamic structures that allowed dinosaurs to take to the aircreationists deny the clear fossil record.”
He had much more to say of course, some of which I'll get to in a minute. I must say that while reading the article, I was troubled how many misconceptions Switek has about creationism. What really ticks me off is when evolutionists try to make a case for themselves without actually doing the research. I find Switek's ignorance of what we creationists believe appalling. If only he continued to research and find answers to why creationists don't believe dinosaurs evolved into birds, then perhaps he would not have been so bold in his statements. Like any other fossils in the fossil record, even though the observable evidence dinosaur and bird fossils can point to or suggest a certain conclusion, they do not speak for themselves and are left to the interpretation of the individual based upon observable evidence. Evolutionists like to claim that creationists start from a presupposition and use that to base their opinions on, while they base their opinions on scientific facts. Now, it is true that we have presumptions, but so do evolutionists! They fail to realize is that they do the exact same thing. In this article, I plan to talk about the evidence for and against the dino-to-bird hypothesis and see what the evidence best suggests.
So what is the “evidence” for this belief in dinosaurs evolving into birds? Switek claims there is a “mountain of evidence that birds are living dinosaurs” and that we creationists deny the clear fossil record. Let's at the so-called evidence now and see whether we're the ones rejecting the clear fossil record. Before we go on though, let me explain that evolutionists do not believe all dinosaurs evolved into birds; they believe the ancestors of birds are maniraptorans, small theropod (meat-eating) dinosaurs. Some of these dinosaurs include Deinonychus, Troodon and the famous Velociraptor.
Dromaeosaurs, such as this Velociraptor, are commonly seen as relatives of modern birds.
Bird-hipped and Lizard-hipped Dinosaurs
Evolutionists are quick to mention that maniraptorans are very similar to modern birds anatomically. This is true. In fact there are over 100 skeletal features that dinosaurs share with birds; some dinosaurs such as Velociraptor even had a wishbone. But what is often not mentioned are the often quite significant differences between the two. Within the order Dinosauria there are two subcategories in which dinosaurs are divided, saurischians (lizard-hipped dinosaurs) and ornithiscians (bird-hipped dinosaurs). The dinosaurs in these two categories are divided based upon their hip shape. The difference between the two hip shapes is the pubis bone; the pubis bone in birds and bird-hipped dinosaurs points toward the rear instead of to the front as in lizard-hipped dinosaurs, modern reptiles and mammals.
Saurischian or lizard-like hip structure.
Ornithischian or bird-like hip structure.
Problem with dino-to-bird evolution? All the dinosaurs that evolutionists believe are related to birds (e.g. Velociraptor, Troodon, Sinornithosaurus) are lizard-hipped! Dinosaurs that are bird-hipped include Stegosaurus, Triceratops and Parasaurolophus. These dinosaurs bear very few bird-like features and are not believed to have evolved into birds. Yet the few times this is ever mentioned in secular literature, documentaries and etc. this problem is never presented any emphasis. And why would they?
The lumbering 4-ton Stegosaurus is a bird-hipped dinosaur, meaning it must have evolved into birds! Right? Of course not!
The hand bones of Dienonychus (left) and Archaeopteryx (right) are quite similar.
Evolutionists absolutely love to talk about how both theropods and birds have three-fingered hand bones. Evidence of a dino-bird relationship? Hardly. As birds supposedly evolved from theropods, you'd expect that the digits represented in the hand bones would be the same in both dinosaurs and birds. However, dinosaurs have the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd digits (the first being the thumb); birds have the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th digits in their hand. What happened?
Avian vs. Reptilian Lungs
The dinosaur Sinosauropteryx was so well preserved, that the reptilian-like lungs have also been fossilized.
If theropods are the ancestors of birds, you should find avian-like lungs in theropods. Of course, as most dinosaur remains are fossil bones, we can't know too much about their lungs and respiratory system. However, paleontologists have discovered the fossilized remains of a Sinosauropteryx, a small bird-like theropod from China, related to Compsognathus. This Sinosauropteryx specimen retains the outline of the visceral cavity, and it is very well preserved. Much to the dismay of evolutionists, they reveal that the lung is very much like that of a crocodile.
In Switek's article, he mentions how the Creation Museum didn't display feathered dinosaurs, nor does Answers in Genesis portray dinosaurs with feathers in books and DVD's. And he's right. But what if there's actually a scientifically good reason for this? Of course, failing to do his research to see why creationists don't portray feathered dinosaurs, he just scoffs and claims that “they take pride in promoting out-of-date, monstrous dinosaurs that more easily fit their contention that these animals were created separately from all other forms of life.” I'm very sorry Switek, but maybe you are the one who's trying to go against the fossil evidence. Like just about every other evolutionist out there, he claims that creationists just believe in non-feathered dinosaurs because we believe they didn't evolve into birds and then points to so-called “feathered” dinosaurs; no further explanation is given. He would have only had to read a few articles on the Answers in Genesis website to find their true opinion, which I will get to in a minute.
Is there actually evidence to support the belief that dinosaurs, like this Troodon, had feathers?
There are two types of “feathered dinosaurs” you'll hear about: dinosaurs with bird-like flight feathers and dinosaurs with proto-feathers. First let's look at the dinosaurs with “proto-feathers”. In 1996, evolutionists thought they found the amazing proof for their theory upon the discovery of Sinosauropteryx. This small carnivorous dinosaur is associated with the outline of what many believe to be fur-like proto-feathers. But upon looking at the “proto-feathers” closely, you can see that they really aren't that feather-like. They are much more similar to hair in appearence. In fact, it seems to some creationists that seems that these features are actually connective tissue fibers (collagen); this is found in the deeper dermal layers of the skin. These features have been found not only on other dinosaurs, but also ichthyosaurs, dolphin-like marine reptiles! Yet no one suggests these creatures were feathered. Another thing about the "fluffy-looking" structures that creation scientists have noticed is that many of these structures appear almost fur-like. Perhaps some of these dinosaurs were covered in something similar to pcynofibers, fur-like structures found on pterosaurs that are very similar to mammalian hair.
Dinosaurs like Sinosauropteryx might have been covered in a type of "fur".
In this article, Switek mentions this fossil discovery:
“Put feathers on a Velociraptorwe know it had feathers thanks to quill knobs preserved along its arm bonesand you get something disturbingly birdlike, revealing the dinosaur's kinship to the ancestors of Archaeopteryx and other early birds.”
In 2007, scientists published the find of a fossil arm bone of a Velociraptor. Along the forearm are six bumps that they claimed were very similar to those found on the bones of some modern birds. In modern birds the bumps are the quill knobs where feathers were once supposedly rooted. Is this proof of a feathered dinosaur? Perhaps, but sources that talk about this find give no details as to why the quill knobs don't extend further along this bone or if there were other fossils were also examined or how complete the find was. Who's to say this is even the arm bone of a Velociraptor? There are many uncertainties with this fossil. Keep in mind that I'm not doubting the validity of the scientists who studied the fossil, but we should also remember that we should be cautious about such claims based on scant evidence and the claims made by scientists with evolutionary presuppositions.
No feathers seem to have been present on Velociraptor, but pcynofiber-like fuzz is still a possibility.
What about “dinosaurs” that actually have fully-functional actual feathers? Archaeopteryx and Microraptor are two such creatures. Both of these animals bear toothy snouts, clawed and feathery wings and bony tails. They also both have a pair of enlarged retractable toe claws like those of raptor dinosaurs, such as Deinonychus and Velociraptor. Surely this is proof that these animals are the missing links between dinosaurs and birds.
Microraptor is a very unique creature with four fully-functional feathered wings.
First of all the feathers on the bodies of Archaeopteryx and Microraptor are actual feathers and not collagen fibers or fur-like structures. They also have the same digits configuration of modern birds (like modern birds they bear the 2nd, 3rd and 4th digits). Undoubtedly, these animals are birds. The fact that they have reptilian features does not make them half reptile/half bird. In fact, there are several actual birds that have reptilian features: ostriches and baby hoatzins also have clawed wings, and no one questions that these animals are birds; the extinct bird Hesperornis possesses teeth in its beak; and the seriema of today even has an enlarged second toe claw, similar to the ones seen in raptors. If you don't need a missing link between dinosaurs and birds (which creationists don't) then there's no need to call Microraptor and Archaeopteryx anything other than 100% birds.
The seriema is a medium-sized bird living today with an enlarged toe claw, similar to the ones found on dromaeosaurs.
If you look in dinosaur books, you've likely seen diagrams similar to the one below:
This is a typical chart showing the evolution of dinosaurs to birds.
This picture suggests that the fossil record wonderfully displays the evolution from dinosaurs to birds; with more dinosaur-like creatures in lower geologic rock layers and more bird-like creatures in higher layers, slowly evolving more complex feathers. Isn't it strange that we creationists reject the plain evidence in the fossil record as Switek states we do?
Unfortunately, this isn't what the fossil record represents at all! Despite this being portrayed in just about every secular dinosaur book, the “clear fossil record” (as Switek puts it) tells a different story. Archaeopteryx, the famed transitional between dinosaurs and birds is believed to have existed 150-148 million years ago, during the Late Jurassic Period. The problem? Most bird-like dinosaurs that are commonly said to be closely related to birds, according to this worldview, lived before Archaeopteryx! Sinosauropteryx, a dinosaur with “proto-feathers” is claimed to have lived 124-122 million years ago! In fact, most dinosaurs with so-called “proto-feathers” are found above rock layers with more bird-like animals! The only dinosaur with "proto-feathers" that evolutionists have that didn't live after Archaeopteryx is Juravenator. But according to evolutionists, Juravenator lived at the same time as Archaeopteryx! In addition to this, we find birds very similar to the ones we see today living with "dino-birds". A Microraptor skeleton described in 2011 was discovered with tree-perching bird fossils (more bird-like than Microraptor) inside of its abdomen! This animal didn't only live with modern-like birds it ate them! Even Velociraptor, a very bird-like dinosaur, is usually dated to live about 80 million years ago, long after birds has supposedly been flying through the skies for millions of years. These creatures were hardly ancestors to the birds. I for think the fossil record clearly demonstrates that dinosaurs evolved into birds, don't you? (That was sarcastic by the way).
Of course, I am not at all saying we should find all the transitional forms between dinosaurs and birds if this transition really did occur, but we should find a few. Evolution on this scale would take tens of millions of years and millions of generations between dinosaurs and birds. Where are these fossils? Surely some should have popped up if the "clear fossil record" suggests dinosaurs evolved into birds.
And to make matters even worse for evolutionists, extinct birds such as Anchiornis, Xiaotingia, Aurornis and potentially Protoavis are buried in sediment “older” than Archaeopteryx!
So, Switek, you believe the "clear fossil record" portrays dinosaurs evolving into birds? Hm...
Earlier, I mentioned how Switek claimed creationists don't like feathered dinosaurs. What if a feathered dinosaur with actual feathers were discovered? Would this prove that dinosaurs evolved into birds and that the Bible is untrue? Nope! In fact, nothing in the Bible goes against the idea that dinosaurs might have had feathers. Not only that, but I happen to like the look of feathered dinosaurs; I am not against the notion of feathered dinosaurs in the slightest, just the idea that they evolved into birds. Finding a feathered dinosaur would be no different than finding a mammal that lays eggs. which we actually have! The duck-billed platypus and porcupine-like echidna are monotreme mammals that lay eggs instead of giving birth to live young like all other mammals. Yet they aren't half mammals/half reptiles; they're mammals that lay eggs. We creationists aren't against the idea of feathered dinosaurs at all, it's just that so far, the evidence for feathered dinosaurs is missing in action.
Like Microraptor, the platypus bears characteristics of many different creatures, including the ability to lay eggs, a duck-like bill, a beaver-like tail and webbed feet, a mammal's fur, the ability to use a form of sonar and even a venomous spur. Yet it is not some evolutionary missing link, but a mosaic.
In order to prove that dinosaurs evolved into birds, one would need to find evidence of a transition between the two in the fossil record (like reptile scales evolving into feathers) and the fossil record would need to show dinosaurs and birds evolving in the right order. This is not what we find!
Why haven't evolutionists who love to talk badly about creationists bring up the points I made in this article? An even better question is why would they do such a thing? Never in Switek's article does he even mention these problems with the dino-bird theory (or solutions to them)! Like many other evolutionists out there, he decided to pick on the claim made by creationists rather than the evidence that backs up the claim in order to make creationists sound like unprofessional idiots. What he wrote in this article shows just how utterly and willingly ignorant he is of creationism and what we believe to be true (and more importantly why we believe it to be true).
As I hope to have made clear throughout this article, if one looks at the fossil record from an evolutionary perspective, we don't really learn about the origin of birds. It's really sad how little research Switek did on the truth about creationism, Answers in Genesis, dinosaurs, birds and the fossil record as a whole. I doubt hearing the truth would have actually change his mind, but at least he would have been more informed. Until he decides to learn what creationists actually have to say and only talking about evidence from his own side of the argument, he should avoid talking about creationism altogether. (Unlike him, I used information from both sides).
I do however hope that this article has enlightened you, my readers, and helped you understand that the fossil record doesn't support the belief that birds and dinosaurs didn't share the same lineage, but that they do share the same wonderful Creator God.
You can relax, dinosaur lovers! The turkey you'll have for Thanksgiving this year isn't the descendant of this Velociraptor!
Actual Justice Warrior: I know what you're thinking. We're talking about Michael Brown, yet again. But it's important to go over videos that still perpetuate lies related to Michael Brown because it's a foundational lie, it is actually the lie that led to the foundation of the Black Lives Matter movement. And on top of that, it's a good test of whether the subject that you're talking to, the person that you're talking to, no matter what side of the political spectrum they are on, has any honor, any integrity, or any curiosity. People who get the Michael Brown case wrong are missing either one of those three or all of those three, because they don't care about the facts, they don't care about the information, even though it is plainly obvious and out there for anybody to see, as I've shown multiple times in this video.
[in the video that follows, AJW proceeds to argue that the police shooting a black man was justified; these are the comments]
Marcara081: I like it when violent criminals are killed and I'm tired of pretending like that's not normal.
Common Sense Productions: Ask BLM supporters to name one person killed that was not committing crime and/or resisting arrest. Works every time
Demon King: Domagoj Čović someone said breonna Taylor was moving drugs and said the boyfriend shot through the door as soon as police knocked. Breonna Taylor I’m not 100 percent sure. Should’ve said Sandra bland but Sandra bland commuted suicide
Common Sense Productions: I’m not saying there are NO examples but most people don’t know them. Most names people do know we’re acting as criminals before their death; temir rice, breonna Taylor, Floyd, Arbery, rayshard Brooks, Michael brown, Trayvon Martin, etc etc. They were all engaged in criminal acts or resisting arrest. Does not necessarily justify a killing, but it is indeed relevant to consider
Joseph Van Horn: Who a population chooses as it’s heroes says A LOT about who those people are. ALL of the people who get turned into martyrs by BLM are criminals and were guilty of the crime that the police interaction was based on. Meanwhile a brilliant man like Thomas Sowell goes unknown by the vast majority. People like Brandon Tatum and Candice Owens are called awful names and ostracized for trying to promote strength, responsibility, and shedding the victim narrative.
Eric McManus: We must remember, that at the time this happened, Obama was president and Eric Holder was the AG. They wanted Darren Wilson to be guilty. That's why they did 3 autopsy's. They wanted to try to find some reason to say Brown did nothing wrong. And this is because Obama and Holder are race hustlers. But even they couldn't warp the evidence to fit their narrative.
The really big question is this:
What is wrong with this shooting on atheism? If there is no God, then all things are permissible - there certainly will not be any objective moral justice meted out to the terrorist. Atheists generally agree with me here:
“In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won’t find any rhyme or reason in it, or any justice. The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is. And we dance to its music.” (Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life (1995))
“Let me summarize my views on what modern evolutionary biology tells us loud and clear and these are basically Darwin’s views. There are no gods, no purposes, and no goal-directed forces of any kind. There is no life after death. When I die, I am absolutely certain that I am going to be dead. That’s the end of me. There is no ultimate foundation for ethics, no ultimate meaning in life, and no free will for humans, either.” A-theist William Provine
“The position of the modern evolutionist is that humans have an awareness of morality because such an awareness of biological worth. Morality is a biological adaptation no less than are hands and feet and teeth. Considered as a rationally justifiable set of claims about an objective something, ethics is illusory. I appreciate when someone says, Love thy neighbor as thyself,’ they think they are referring above and beyond themselves. Nevertheless, such reference is truly without foundation. Morality is just an aid to survival and reproduction, . . . and any deeper meaning is illusory.” (Michael Ruse, “Evolutionary Theory and Christian Ethics,” in The Darwinian Paradigm (London: Routledge, 1989), pp. 262-269).
“Is there a God? No.
What is the nature of reality? What physics says it is.
What is the purpose of the universe? There is none.
What is the meaning of life? Ditto.
Why am I here? Just dumb luck.
Is there a soul? Are you kidding?
Is there free will? Not a chance!
What is the difference between right/wrong, good/bad? There is no moral difference between them So much for the meaning of history, and everything else we care about you will have to be comfortable with a certain amount of nihilism . . . . And just in case there’s always Prozac.” -- Alex P. Rosenberg
First of all, you're way off base in terms of how you're understanding all three of those atheist statements. They don't mean what you think they mean.
This article is one you need to read, because it puts all the William Lane Craig stuff in the dumpster where it belongs:
Here's a sampling:
The entire Twitter engagement about moral ontology (which arose after being asked for evidence that God exists, recall) arose with "do you think objective morality exists?"
I answered this question the same way I answered it in God Doesn't; We Do.
"It depends on how we define the word 'objective.'" I don't mean to play word games here--indeed, I think it's an interesting and hard question. Let me show you what I mean by showing you two ways we can interpret that term:
(1) The theist way: Objective morals are divine ethical laws that stem from a source outside of human minds (the fellow I talked with last night specifically said this, adding the words "transcendent" and "supernatural" in the mix).
(2) The science way: Objective morals are ethical guidelines that have been empirically determined to optimize values in salient metrics that gauge them.
Incidentally, while the term "supernatural" cannot apply to (2) above, the term "transcendent" can, but not in anything but the mundane "societies are bigger than individuals" sense.
So, I'm not being a jerk when I say that the term "objective morals" isn't sufficiently clear for me to answer the question of whether or not they exist.
Those statements mean exactly what they clearly say.
The fact that you do not WANT them to mean what they clearly say and mean is no warrant against their clarity. Those are just your feelings talking. :-)
There is really no shame in admitting you don't understand them :)
Let's look at Dawkins first: What do you think his statement is saying? That atheists should care nothing about killing or harming others wantonly because they don't believe they'll answer to a God?
"There is really no shame in admitting you don't understand them."
There is really no shame in admitting you DO understand them but don't like what they say. :-)
I wouldn't be ashamed of such a thing, but it's patently absurd to suggest that we need a God to be moral people. You know this, and that article I liked pretty much gives William Lane Craig the spanking he's always deserved. Did you read it?
"we need a God to be moral people"
You miss the point completely between ontology (existence) and sociology (behavior). Here is a great short video for you to watch that will distinguish between these two concepts and epistemology (how we come to know objective moral values and duties):
You're very fond of saying that to people, but I don't think you have a clue what it means yourself. Epistemology is how we come to know things, and ontology is what IS. So I know full well the difference. How do you think it relates to the discussion at hand, and what makes you say that I missed the point in what I said?
"You're very fond of saying that to people"
You're very fond of saying "You're very fond of saying." :-)
"but I don't think you have a clue what it means yourself."
Projection, after you confused the terms yourself. :-)
"Epistemology is how we come to know things, and ontology is what IS."
So, you admit that you confused sociology with ontology above when you wrote "it's patently absurd to suggest that we need a God to be moral people"?
"So I know full well the difference."
Apparently not. Well, maybe the short video taught you better. That is progress.
"How do you think it relates to the discussion at hand"
The atheist quotes are about ontology, the existence of objective moral values and duties, of objective good or evil. Your strawmen were about sociology and pin one case epistemology. Pretty simple actually.
If seems you have a fight with your fellow atheists. Just take it up with them - publish a paper that contradicts their quotes regarding ontology.
Come now, I've seen it over and over. You say to people "You are confusing moral epistemology with moral ontology" to try to flummox them with your highfalutin language. Well, I am not intimidated by it, I know what it means, and you know as well as I do that you can't possibly know moral ontology when it comes to God because God is not knowable. And by assuming you know God you're not going to win any arguments. Tell me please what I have "confused" here. I know it perfectly.
"So, you admit that you confused sociology with ontology above when you
wrote "it's patently absurd to suggest that we need a God to be moral
No, because it IS patently absurd. Did you or did you not read the article I linked? It talks at length about the ridiculousness of making the statement that we need God to make moral statements.
The atheist quotes are no such thing. You are making the Dawkins quote in particular to be about behavior, and it's NOT about behavior. Dawkins is simply making the statement that DNA doesn't have a conscience, it just is. How can he be talking about moral ontology when he's discussing DNA? He isn't suggesting that we go out and kill people because of it. And that's how you're interpreting it, which is wrong. Pretty simple actually.
I'm on board with everything those atheists said, and guess what? We don't need God to know good behavior from bad. What a shame you think you do.
"Tell me please what I have "confused" here."
Already did. Not only told you but proved it to you. The fact that your feeewings were hurt is not warrant against the truth.
"Dawkins is simply making the statement that DNA doesn't have a conscience"
False. No one defends that it does. Morality is always discussed inseparably from humans. No one goes around saying "rocks aren't good or bad." That's silly. Dawkins meant what Dawkins said.
"I'm on board with everything those atheists said"
I know you are. :-)
"We don't need God to know good behavior from bad. What a shame you think you do."
What a shame that you once again confused epistemology (how we know right from wrong) with ontology (the existence of right or wrong). You are the gift that keeps on giving! :-)
No, you have proven nothing. What you did was insist by stamping your little feet that I don't know the difference between moral ontology and moral epistemology, and I proved to you that I did. Furthermore, my original statement still stands strong: We don't require a God to be moral people.
"Dawkins is simply making the statement that DNA doesn't have a conscience"
"No one defends that it does. Morality is always discussed inseparably from humans. No one goes around saying "rocks aren't good or bad." That's silly. Dawkins meant what Dawkins said."
All right, well, in that case, may I ask you if you know what DNA is? Deoxyribonucleic acid?
It seems pretty obvious to me that Dawkins was saying that bad stuff happens in the world. The universe doesn't have a conscience because the universe doesn't have morals. That's all Dawkins was saying. Somehow you find that shocking and horrible. Why? It's true. What did you infer from Dawkins' statement that had him saying there was nothing stopping us from murdering little old ladies? You sure like to post his quote a lot. It would help if you knew what he meant, I think.
"What a shame that you once again confused epistemology (how we know right from wrong) with ontology (the existence of right or wrong)."
I did no such thing. Your arrogance in this matter is your stumbling block. You think you know moral ontology, that you know the existence of right and wrong and that you know God. You don't. That's nothing more than faith. You keep making God a foregone conclusion and argue from that standpoint. What you need to do is take a step back from that position and say "IF God exists..." Because that's the crux of the matter here. We need a level playing ground. And we're never going to have a level playing ground if you keep assuming God before the debate even starts. Moral ontology, which you keep talking about, isn't yours to claim.
RE: I’m sick of being mistaken for my biracial children’s nanny
If the mudshark baby can pass for white, it's another Sandra Laing situation waiting to happen in a few generations.
No it won't. It's obvious these kids aren't fully white based on eyes and hair texture.
Sandra Laing's mother was a filthy mudshark. It is so obvious Sandra is a mulatto. There has NEVER been a DNA test to this day to prove that white guy was her father. Only a blood typing test was done. The white woman lucked out that her white husband and negro lover shared the same blood type.
When they hit puberty they will look totally Nonwhite, and the daughter, atleast, will hate it. The mother will probably hate it too.
White man threw away his genes, for "companionship" and a housemaid.
Based on other articles this oriental has written he married a feminist author more obsessed with her social media than being a mom.
Oriental women turn into demanding shrews after marriage that make white feminists seem demure.
And I'm sick of white men that marry and have children with Asian women. There is a special place in hell for white nordic males that breed with asian women or any non white women. He threw away his genes and destroyed his European bloodline.
Half Asian children always grow up to look weird even if they kind of look white or less Asian than you think they would. The Asian look always comes out when they get older.
When they hit puberty they will look totally Nonwhite, and the daughter, atleast, will hate it. The mother will probably hate it too.
White man threw away his genes, for "companionship" and a housemaid.
Very true. I knew a woman who is half Japanese. Her shrewish mother hated her because every time she looked at her she saw a female who was whiter than her. She hates herself.
Eurasians usually turn out looking like space aliens. At least with mulattos most of the time they just look like regular although lightly fairer complexioned Black people.
I'm sick of biracial children period. Their parents should be.. I better stop now.
Me me me me me woe is me. It's all about her and her petty whining. I hate these types of articles. Get over yourself you navel gazing, narcissistic Chinese. The only people who have the time for this tripe are snot nosed Jews and virtue signalling white liberals in the universities and the media.
Sandra Laing's father did a DNA test at the time and it was proven he was the birth father. Her brothers also were high yellow but light enough to pass for white. They accepted her until she got with a Bantu.
At some point that black gene is going to pop out AGAIN.
It wasn't a DNA test. Those didn't even exist back then. It was a blood type test. That was considered acceptable for paternity back then. Women didn't whore around with multiple men back then and if the father's blood type (A,B,O) was an appropriate match, case closed.
Let me reiterate. IT WAS NOT A DNA test. One has never been done to this day.
That maybe. But that still does not refute the examples I gave about the mulattoes.
Eartha Kitt is half white. Her daughter is a quarter black having a German father. She looks white and is a natural blonde. She married a non-black (I think he's a Jew), and her kids look White. Maya Rudolph is a mulatto, married a white guy, and her kids look white.
That black gene is going to come back at some point down the line.
Even if the Black gene doesn't pop out again, mt haplogroup L like continue on indefinitely regardless of how hard they try to breed up. That's assuming Etha Kitts's mother was Black, which in this case, I hope it was her father that was Black, not the other way around! Otherwise, we now have White looking females with mt haplogroup L, exactly what we don't want!
My stand on bi-racial people is that when forced to choose, by default they take the race of the parent of the same gender. This based on the transmission of mt and Y haplogroups.
For instance, a bi-racial male with a White father, or a bi-racial female with a White mother can produce arguably assimilable offspring with a fully White spouse. Not an ideal scenario and the kids would likely not be considered White. However, the non-White DNA could be breed out eventually. Therefor such bi-racial people would be a low priority for removal from White society.
On the other hand, a bi-racial male with a fully non-White father or a bi-racial female with a non-White mother is fully NON-WHITE and NOT assimilable! It should be illegal for a bi-racial female with a non-White mother and non-White mt haplogroup to marry a White man. Someone like Magan Markle as an example.
The late boxer Muhammad Ali/Cassius Clay has white - looking grandson. Cassius Clay is a part mulatto and had several wives ( all are black/mulatto women). One of his daughters had lighter skin than either parent and that daughter married a white man. Hence a white looking grandson:
This is why I it is dangerous to rally whites with "if it looks white it must be white". Especially when it comes to "White Latin American" people. I don't trust them until I see a DNA test. They are so mixed, even the white looking ones could be very mixed.
Race is about genes and not just physical looks. Some people are sacrificing the genes that created the west for physical attributes alone.
* * *
When we do a Google Image search for the word "genius", the first thing, and I do mean, thing, we see is the wretched mug of Albert Einstein. Plug in the word "scientist", and again, St. Albert is the first face to populate. You can scroll and scroll way down those pages and not even find a hint of folks like Tesla, von Braun, Shockley, and other great names. Why is that? Was St. Albert really such a "genuius"? Or is this a case of the press pumping-up a fellow tribesman?
* * *
EINSTEIN THE PLAGIARIST
Einstein was a serial, psychopathic plagiarist. Einstein's plagiarism has been conclusively proven beyond doubt. (here) Indeed, Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" as well as his famous equation (E=Mc2), were actually published before Einstein claimed credit for them.
EINSTEIN THE MISTAKEN
Einstein's "discoveries", stolen as they were, are still disputed to this day. Einstein himself expressed some doubts about his "theories". Though it is beyond the scope of this author to evaluate theories of physics, the fact that a minority of physicists continue to passionately insist that Einstein's ideas are false, is very intriguing. We wonder, for every one outspoken critic of Einstein, how many more scientists hold the very same doubts but are too intimidated to express them. Of even greater interest is the fact that the scientific doubters are often childishly ridiculed, but never openly debated. Hmmm.
THE GREAT TESLA ON EINSTEIN & RELATIVITY
"Einstein is a beggar dressed in purple clothes and made king using dazzling mathematics that obscure truth"...
"Relativity is a massive deception wrapped in a beautiful mathematical cloak.”
"The theory of relativity is a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense."
"The theory, wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved."
"Relativity is a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a King."
Tesla's most scathing condemnation of the Marxist charlatan was penned in a 1934 poem entitled 'Olympian Gossip', written to a friend. In the poem, Tesla sarcastically mocks Einstein and calls him a "long haired crank". An excerpt:
While listening on my cosmic phone
I caught words from the Olympus blown.
A newcomer was shown around;
That much I could guess, aided by sound.
"There's Archimedes with his lever
Still busy on problems as ever.
Says: matter and force are transmutable
And wrong the laws you thought immutable."
Too bad, Sir Isaac, they dimmed your renown
And turned your great science upside down.
Now a long haired crank, Einstein by name,
Puts on your high teaching all the blame.
Says: matter and force are transmutable
And wrong the laws you thought immutable."
"I am much too ignorant, my son,
For grasping schemes so finely spun.
My followers are of stronger mind
And I am content to stay behind.
EINSTEIN THE ATTENTION WHORE
A pure creation of Jewish media hype, Einstein was a pathological attention seeker. The mad scientist enjoyed shooting hot air out of his lying mouth on every subject imaginable. Though his sycophant worshippers eagerly ate up his bullshit, astute observors such as the great satirist H.L. Mencken saw right through the Marxist clown. Mencken once referred to Einstein as "that fiend for publicity."
EINSTEIN THE COMMUNIST
Einstein fled Hitler's Germany in 1933 not because he was Jewish, but because he was a politically active Marxist! Einstein held membership in more Communist front groups than one could shake a hammer and sickle at.
These activities continued upon his arrival to America, where he would later defend the traitorous Rosenbergs (executed in 1952 for having passed A-Bomb secrets to the Soviets). Einstein defended other Communist traitors as well (Oppenheimer, Robeson, Fuchs, DuBois etc). In 1947, Stalin's Pravda Newspaper named Einstein to its list of Top-Ten Friends of the Soviet Union.’
EINSTEIN THE WARMONGER
Einstein the fraud was a self described "pacifist". However, during the 1930's, the "pacifist" suddenly became an fierce advocate for total war against Germany! The famous Einstein-Szilard letter, in which the two Jewish scientists urge the Jew owned President Roosevelt to develop an atomic weapon, was actually written during peacetime in August of 1939! The letter falsely accuses Germany of developing an atomic bomb (the original WMD's Lie!) and urges FDR to beat Hitler to the punch.
The genocidal Einstein was looking forward to the day when Berlin, one of his former homes, could be nuked! Ironically, Einstein was never invited to participate in the Communist infested Manahattan Project (which grew out of Einstein's letter) because the FBI deemed him a security risk. After the war ended, the USA and Stalin's USSR become bitter adversaries. Red Albert conveniently reverted back to "pacifism".
EINSTEIN THE ANTI-AMERICAN
Einstein was an America basher. Not content with bad mouthing and betraying his former German host, Einstein had insults for his adopted American country as well. For example, this sarcastic gem: “Too many of us look upon Americans as dollar chasers. This is a cruel libel, even if it is reiterated thoughtlessly by the Americans themselves.”
While ignoring the racial basis for the "State of Israel", hypocrite Einstein constantly denounced American racism. (see 'Einstein The Racial Agitator' section below). The Red scientist also had harsh words for American anti-Communist patriots, denouncing the great Senator Joseph McCarthy among others.
EINSTEIN THE GLOBALIST
Einstein condemned Nationalism (except for Israeli nationalism) and was very open in his support for a One World Government. He wrote, "There is no salvation for civilization, or even the human race, other than the creation of a world government."
Of course, it will be St. Albert's synagogue buddies who will be running this World Federation, presumably from Israel.
EINSTEIN THE MASS MURDERER
With World War II coming to a close, vindictive Jews worldwide openly called for the genocide of the German people. Indeed, this policy was partially implemented. Among the demonic voices demanding more blood was the "pacifist" Einstein.
He wrote: "The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting.”......it is hoped that by war's end, they will largely have been killed off."
EINSTEIN THE RACE AGITATOR
In spite of segregation, American Blacks were making great economic progress in America during the 1940's & 50's. This didn't stop the ungrateful foreigner Einstein from routinely trashing America for it's "racism". He wrote, "Race prejudice has unfortunately become an American tradition which is uncritically handed down from one generation to the next."
The trouble making Einstein also joined the anti-White, Jewish funded NAACP, and became close friends with two of America's most notorious Black "race hustlers" - W.E. DuBois and Paul Robeson, both Communists.
EINSTEIN THE ZIONIST
Though not a religious Jew, Einstein was indeed an ethnocentric Jew who saw the world through a "Jews vs Gentiles" lens. In 1952, soon after Jewish terror gangs had ethnically cleansing Arab villages, Einstein was offered the presidency of the illegitimate State of Israel. He politely declined the offer: “I am deeply moved by the offer from our State of Israel, and at once saddened and ashamed that I cannot accept it.”
(On being accused of constantly cutting and pasting the same three atheist quotes from Dawkins, Provine and Ruse out of context)
Well, I am going to cut and paste these three quotes over and over again until every atheist I encounter has seen them at least once, and realizes the nihilism of atheism. Under that view, you are an accident whose lifespan is maybe 80 years. After that, you cease to exist, and eventually, the universe dies a slow cold death in darkness. Your existence will matter not one whit, so neither did the SCOTUS ruling or any objective purpose, meaning, or morality that you fabricate in order to delude yourself. You may pretend all you want, but you are just delud ing yourself. So, you cannot say, under your view, that anything is objectively "wrong" (including homophobia) without acknowledging the existence of an Objective Standard, or God. If you disagree, just take it up with your "pope" and "cardinals."
“Is there a God? No.
What is the nature of reality? What physics says it is.
What is the purpose of the universe? There is none.
What is the meaning of life? Ditto.
Why am I here? Just dumb luck.
Is there a soul? Are you kidding?
Is there free will? Not a chance!
What is the difference between right/wrong,
good/bad? There is no moral difference between them So much for the meaning of history, and everything else we care about you will have to be comfortable with a certain amoun t of nihilism . . . . And just in case there’s always Prozac.” -- Alex P. Rosenberg
[From "SHOCKER: Squaws continue dying when locked in their racially segregated homes"]
Lorraine, hang on a sec... are you saying you just discovered domestic violence among aboriginal peoples? And how exactly is 'colonialism' or 'coronavirus' beating the snot out of aboriginal women?
I guess they should have taken the quiz.
However, what caught my eye about the original article was this bit:
But Whitman says many shelters and sexual assault centres in the country are not run for or by Indigenous people, which is why many First Nations, Inuit and Metis women won't access them, even if they're in trouble.
"They don't have that comfort zone there and they're not culturally influenced or inclusive of the Indigenous values that we have and our traditions and ceremonies."
If squaws are literally so backward minded that they won't seek help from the only race that's ultimately willing to help them (whites), then every #MMIW is 100% deserved and we should cheer when it happens.
Also, hate to break it to you sister, but "inclusive of the Indigenous values that we have and our traditions" involves you getting beaten and killed by your savage relations. You can't separate the wheat from the chaff on this: it's all chaff.
Completely unrelated: Notice the Redmonton Urinal doesn't give out the race of this dangerous armed rapist. It's totally unrelated to the fact that Rodney Gambler is an Injun.
Yes I have. A real witch was sent after me and cursed me with a spell. She sealed a bad spirit in me. You see, I am a servant of God with special privileges and a special relationship with God. I also have a destiny to fulfill. Don't get me wrong, I am an average person. It is my relationship and situation that is special, but my situation is also one of a kind. It is a situation that happens once in a lifetime, if ever for anyone. The impossible has to be a accomplished against impossible odds.
There has been a challenge between good and bad spirits for my soul. God has allowed this to happen as a challenge. I have to overcome before the return of Christ which is not to long from now, within a decade.
The curse at times affects my brain, heart and hormones beyond my control. This most often happens without any conscious thoughts and feelings of my own.
It takes a lot of inner strength to regain control of its affect on me. Usually I gain control within minutes, but there are times when it takes longer. The spirit inside me is here to make me fail in reaching my destiny. It is trying to corrupt me from within and to get me to do things, my God forbids, of my own will, deliberately. If it succeeds in corrupting me I will loose everything with which God is waiting to bless me. It also can and will take over my soul and destroy me if I sin and fail. Then God will have to choose someone else in my place because of my failure. You see God and it knows that without it within me it would not even be nearly possible to corrupt me from outside myself through what I see, hear or through temptation by people because of my love for God and his ways, my hatred for sin, and my inner strength of character.
It is powerful enough to make me do what is forbidden but God would still be with me because he knows it will have forced me from within. So it tries to make me want to do something seriously sinful on my own so that I will do it of my own free will so as to loose my favor and inheritance from God. I can only obtain my inheritance by overcoming, breaking the spell. I keep my mind and heart, thinking and emotions clean so that I do not become overcome by any temptations from outside myself while the spirit from within myself influences me at times. God knows how much I hate seriously sinful behavior. So temptations turn me off grossly, and may annoy and irritate me. But I try not to show it in my face, expressions or actions before those who enjoy such behavior. I try not to offend those who feel such behavior is normal and natural before God. We live in a world where people have grown up where sinful practices are the norm. People are obsessed with certain sins. They often or consistently talk, gesture and joke about sinful things. I avoid and ignore it as much as possible. The bad spirit at times will come out of dormancy within me when I am around such behavior or talk to manipulate me. But I always evade and resist it to regain control. God strengthens me afterwards whenever it saps too much of my inner strength and resolve, it can also at times lower my inhibitions.
Each time the opportunity to break the spell arises the bad spirit within and all those outside myself interfere through people by manipulating their minds and hearts to interfere by their words, conduct and attitude beyond or below their sense of awareness. Also sometimes, to frighten someone away from me the spirit will cause such a hormonal reaction within me, mostly tingling, which ranges from mild to extreme uneasiness orcdiscomfort, and somehow (probably by the Ouija to) frighten the other person. In a way it is saying: “Boo!” It especially does this when I meet a real potential for breaking the spell. Yet I have to somehow overcome this as well to succeed. I have failed every time since it started. But I must keep on going until the next opportunity that God directs me. If his holy spirit within me does not move me I often do not act but just wait for an indication of when I should act. Sometimes I act on my own to make something happen though. But I have more complete confidence in a choice when God directs me, even if my imperfect thinking may get in the way temporarily. According to the rules of challenge God cannot do it for me but can only assist me to certain degree and bless me with success once the right conditions and circumstance is achieved. I have to overcome in faith on my own. What God does do is protect me from bad people who want to do me harm. People are responding from what the bad spirits are doing to attract negative attention to me. People are helping and on the side of bad spirits and most do not know it when opposing me. Yet, I have to do what I have to do to break free despite what others think. At the same time I have to balance doing what God directs me to do with not fully disregarding nor fully encroaching upon the rights and feelings of others. God's will is paramount but the will of others should not be completely dismissed. God also, at times quickens (:imparts power to) me with holy spirit. He keeps my spirits up.
My situation often looks as if I am in danger, which is allowed by God, but it is those who think they can harm me that are in danger without knowing it. You see, God and all his angels are watching and listening to all those who are in earned with what is happening. Because the angels simply in practical ways recent them, without causing them harm or death they continue to try to harm me thinking no one nor anything can or will stop them. They feel that they are not in danger but I am. Heaven and I know the danger they are in with God. There is only one true God. Those who want to play God will sooner or later face the consequences of playing God. Interfering in the divine will lead to consequences. The results of meddling will be that no one, nothing in the universe, nor any army could prevent the consequences that will insue, however mild or detrimental they may turn out to be as determined by the degree of motive and actions attempted. Erring on the side of caution is the wisest course.
You might ask, why would God allow such a thing. Well, we were all created by God and given life by him. We were created for him and we should want to do whatever he asks. Besides God knows each person better than they know themselves. It is bad angelic spirits that pose the challenge. If God allows some extreme challenge upon a servant of his he knows that he or she can handle it with his help and eventually come off victorious no matter the odds. With God all things are possible. So if God allows this to happen obviously he knows the character of that particular servant is strong enough to handle it and he will give his holy spirit to ensure that his servant can, when and where he or she lacks strength.
It is always for his glory and our own good and future. God always blesses the faithful generously. Often such blessing are unimaginable and unforseen. Look at how God blessed Joseph and Job. Their life story is even recorded in history. We can read and many have read about them over some 3,500 years later.
Message To Women, Being Sexy Is Not Enough, written by Major Mack.
Are black women sexy? No doubt! When it comes to sexiness sisters have no equal. But can I be honest with you? I'm actually TIRED of sexy black women. Now hear me out on this, please.
Sexiness don't mean jack snot. Not in the grand scheme of things. Visually appealing, yes. But I can't eat sexiness. Sexiness won't help pay these bills or pay off our student loans. Sexiness won't qualify for a mortgage, or get the IRS off my back long enough to make my next big business move.
Sexiness won't help me raise these kids. Neither will it teach my daughters their true worth and value in this world.
We got way too many 'Sexy' sistas out here with nothing else to bring to the table. Sexiness is the totality of their package. And that's WACK!
Most black men looking for a relationship want a USEFUL woman. Visual appeal alone won't cut it. Besides: there are so many black women competing to be the sexiest, it's not even a race worth entering.
Can you cook? Do you clean? Do you have mothering skills Do you love your father? Respect him? Respect other black men in general? Have you divested yourself of prior relationship baggage? Can you hold a conversation about REAL world events? And no: Love and Hip Hop doesn't count!
Do you have a REAL relationship with a REAL God: or do you follow the fake one many American Christians have invented for themselves because he's more tolerable than the actual Truth?
These are the kind of questions discerning men are asking nowadays.
So if sexiness is all you bring to the table, you can keep it. I'd rather have a woman of pure unadulterated SUBSTANCE. And I'm sure I speak for most conscious-thinking brothers out there on this one.
There's a new breed of black men out there ladies. And we ain't settling for second best or taking any shorts. Either come correct or go get with Tyrone. That's all many of you are use to dealing with anyway...
[On Karen Klein, the bus monitor being harassed by students on the bus]
Today's youth. They make you proud, don't they? And they will soon vote, if not old enough already. If Obama's "health care" program is not abolished, and government minions are making decisions about who lives and gets treatment, and who dies and goes without THIS crowd - this generation - will be typical of the new crop of government employees making those decisions. Makes you feel safe and secure, doesn't it? And if she had pepper sprayed that most annoying little mulatto behind her, she'd be in jail. They deserve worse than pepper spray. Their daddies need to kick the snot out of these brats, but if their daddies were doing their job, this kind of behavior would not have occurred.
Our public discourse has been reduced to empty, blatantly false slogans repeated by an intentionally ill-educated populace. We are forced to stomach the nauseating lie of “equality” and relentlessly scolded by jews that we Whites are no different from goblinoid Mestizos or homo erectus throwbacks who cannot even fathom the requirements of a civilized society (and through their genetically determined dysfunction, cause civilized societies to cease functioning). At the same time, our thoroughly Judaized society requires us to engage in doublethink and recognize that, despite all the supposed “equality,” the jews are “chosen” and especially intelligent. We are forced to have “acceptance” for depravity and deviancy, for alien invaders who repeatedly and willfully violate our laws and sovereignty, but not for White solidarity or healthy White communities. We are told to “Make America Great Again” by fighting wars in the Middle East and paying tens of billions of dollars each year for the aggrandizement of Israel, while doing less than nothing to stop the endless hordes of bowel-movement brown sub-humanity from inundating our once-White country. And perhaps the tritest slogan of all, which has become the oath of office for all Weimerican government officials who serve only jewish interests, “Diversity is our greatest strength.”
The truth of the matter is that diversity is the most devastating weapon in the jewish arsenal being brought to bear against us in the Hebraic genocide of Whites. Diversity is so great a strength for the jews that by merely speaking out against it, you can face economic destitution, civil (and sometimes criminal) litigation and sanctions, ostracism, the denial of basic services, and violence that is tacitly approved by the state.
We are supposed to celebrate as our once-safe White countries are overrun by violent savages from the worst corners of the world. Where there were once prosperous, homogeneous White societies forged into communities across generations, there are now deracinated mobs and incompatible, alienated strangers kept in unnatural proximity by the threat of state-sponsored force. The two-faced jews promoting this diversity disaster expect us to keep our eyes fixed obediently on the talmudvision, watching anthropological curiosities play children’s games and nightmare creatures rapping about their penises. We are not supposed to notice that the rapidly accelerating eradication of White homelands is causing civilization to disappear along with the race that created it.
This disappearance of civilization happens quickly, and is already plain for all to see in the most diverse areas of the America. There are clearly observable consequences of the jew-instigated diversity that hammer home the frightening demographic statistics describing Whites as a minority in most American schools, and the fact that Whites are a vanishingly small minority in places like California (roughly estimated to be less than 20%, once census data is controlled for the Middle Easterners, Hispanics, and mongrels who “self-identify” as White).
For those who are unware, California’s San Francisco Bay Area is often touted as an example of how diversity supposedly leads to affluence. In reality, it is an example of a dysfunctional diversity dystopia. The largest racial group is Mestizo, followed by Asians, and, in a distant third place, Whites. There is no sense of community – it is a collection of bipedal carrion scavengers, frantically trying to gorge on the leftover, quickly diminishing wealth from the remnants of a once-functional society. There are the unimaginably rich, the horrifically poor, and with each passing day fewer and fewer people between these two extremes. There is no true wealth creation – instead dishonest plutocrats get richer by finding ways to sell out and devalue the standard of living of everyone else. Owning a home here long ago ceased to mean a house. It now means owning nothing but the “air space” inside a condominium that most people would recognize as a hotel room. The roads are crumbling, every public space is covered in trash and graffiti, and government offices are staffed uniformly by obese, surly browns dullards of indeterminate origin with respiratory problems. The schools are either practice prisons filled with violent Mestizos, or Asian ant farms – both are tragicomically equipped with poorly-functioning, ineffective “high tech” learning gimmicks, and battalions of English-as-a-second-language teachers and special education aides. Everyone is concerned about teaching children computer programming, mostly because every attempt at teaching them how to read and write has been an abject failure.
1. I hate children. I think they're dumber the bricks and twice as abrasive. Hence, whatever special treatment that society gives children these days (and yes, it is a fairly recent development that we don't smack the shit out of our little brats when they question our supreme authority) seems stupid to me. When did the adult population become second-class citizens to a bunch of snot-nosed little cretins?
2. If we're talking about people that chop kids up and stuff them in garbage bags while playing the Moby's "We are all made of stars" on their iPods then I have no sympathy for them (because that song is awful) and I don't much care if they get beaten up in prison. However, I don't hate them one ounce more than I hate someone who did the same thing to a 25-year-old or a 35-year-old or an anything-year-old. In fact, I'd be more upset depending on the victim. For instance, if someone killed a 35-year-old artist or scientist I'd be a lot more upset than if the same person had killed 100 children. Children all have the potential to accomplish big things and that's part of why society prizes them--but I prize the people who have already accomplished something more.
3. Most of the people in prison for sex crimes against kids are in there for non-violent coercion of older kids (10-15) for sex. I don't believe that such people should be in prison. I don't subscribe to the ludicrous notion that someone under 18 can NEVER give their consent. And I don't view such people as worse than murders or even as bad people AT ALL. Society has placed a stigma on them as it has placed on Jews, on blacks, on gays, on masons, on countless social, racial and idealogical groups past and present.
If you go back a little over 100 years ago, girls were being married off before their breasts had started budding. I'm not saying things should return to that pattern--I'm just using that as an example of who recent the stigma on pedophilia is. Do you think human nature has changed drastically since that time? Do you think that the genetic disposition towards nubile young bodies has dissipated simply because we passed a law or two against it? Take a look around our culture and you'll see that we're as youth obsessed as we could ever be. And frankly, I don't think it's healthy for us to simulataneously deny our nature on a physical level and languish in it on a cerebral level, via Hillary Duff, Britney Spears, The Olsen Twins, Aaron Carter and all the other boys and girls who became international sex-symbols before their 18th birthdays.
I understand that you and countless other sheeple believe that the youth of this country are special and therefore entitled to special rights and priveleges and anyone who lusts after their plump little apple-shaped bottoms with drool pooring from their lips is a depraved and irredeemible monster bent on the hideous exploitation of innocence to feed the bonfire of his carnal desires. The problem with you is that you don't distinguish between pedophiles and child-rapists, which is about as fair as me using Jeffrey Dahmer to exemplify gays or OJ Simpson and Scott Peterson to exemplify straights.
Finally, I'd like to point out that most of the children--boys and girls--raped in this country every year are raped by straight, white men who are typically most attracted to fully developed women. They are usually family members or friends of the family of their victims and use their leverage to get some easy pussy. It's like when you get really desperate as a teenager and get your dog to lick your balls (don't deny it, you fucking freak--Kinsey did studies). People settle. And people with sociopathic tendencies settle for children because they see that they can get away with it and lack the conscience not to.
But sociopathy and pedophilia are two entirely different things. Most pedophiles are not sociopaths and most sociopaths are not pedophiles. Yet pedophiles are judged by the small cross-section between the two, even though most pedophiles have never engaged in sex acts with children and most of those who have did it under circumstances socially acceptible (under the right conditions) just a little over a century ago.
I hope I've made myself clear.
I do not need to tell my readers repeatedly about the harm which christianity has inflicted upon our race: that is self evident. However christianity is directly responsible for Aryan peoples forgetting their divine ancestry. In particular the pre-christian Germanic peoples took it as self evident that they were children of the Gods. Not only were they graced with a God-like noble Nordic outward form but our mythology makes it clear that we are not merely the creation of the Gods but their literal offspring. Tuisto is the earth-born divine ancestor of the Germanic peoples who trace their lineage to Him via Mannus and His three sons who fathered the Ingaevones/Ingvaeones, Herminones/Hermiones and Istaevones/Istvaeones.
Alfred Rosenberg, the official philosopher of the Third Reich who was murdered by the western allies for his temerity of being a free thinker also believed in the divine ancestry of the Germanic peoples
Domino’s sells more than 2.5 million pizzas every day, and the company says it offers at least 15 ways to order one. But Guillermo Robles, who is blind, said neither the company’s website nor its mobile app allowed him to order the pizza he wanted, or receive a discount for ordering online.
Now Domino’s, backed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the nation’s largest retailers, wants the Supreme Court to step in to decide whether the Americans With Disabilities Act, which has transformed America’s physical landscape, applies equally to the Internet.
The ADA “says nothing about the accessibility of websites or applications on smartphones, whether standing alone or in connection with restaurants, stores, or any other brick-and-mortar establishments that qualify as public accommodations,” wrote Washington lawyer Lisa S. Blatt, who represents Domino’s.
“When Congress passed the ADA in 1990, websites were in their infancy, and apps did not yet exist.”
Lower courts have said the statute does apply, although they have disagreed about exactly when and to whom. As a result, the number of lawsuits has exploded: 2,250 federal suits asserting ADA violations based on website inaccessibility were filed in 2018, nearly triple the number from the year before, according to the Domino’s brief.
Beyoncé’s website has been targeted. So have art galleries in New York.
And the National Retail Federation tells the Supreme Court in a friend-of-the-court brief that its website doesn’t comply with industry standards, either.
The group ran supremecourt.govthrough a free online resource that applies Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0) developed by private parties and found “19 ‘known problems’ and 411 ‘potential problems.’ ”
“Only this court’s intervention can establish a true nationwide standard establishing the proper scope” of website accessibility, writes Washington lawyer Pratik A. Shah, representing the retailers. “It is time for this court to bring order to a chaotic legal landscape marked by unpredictable and unworkable accessibility standards that run counter to the goals of the ADA, consumers, and the retailers who serve them.”
Businesses have rallied around the Robles case in their effort to persuade the Supreme Court to intervene, even as they profess that it would be in their best interests to make their goods as accessible as possible.
Robles sued because he said his attempts in 2016 to use the Domino’s website and mobile app to order a pizza for delivery were unsuccessful.
A federal judge in California agreed with Robles that the ADA covered websites but dismissed the lawsuit. He agreed with Domino’s that its due process rights would be violated because the Department of Justice has never made good on its obligation to issue guidance on exactly how websites and apps should comply with Title III of the act, which concerns public accommodations.
But earlier this year, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit disagreed.
“At least since 1996, Domino’s has been on notice that its online offerings must effectively communicate with its disabled customers and facilitate ‘full and equal enjoyment’ of Domino’s goods and services,” Circuit Judge John B. Owens wrote.
He added: “While we understand why Domino’s wants DOJ to issue specific guidelines for website and app accessibility, the Constitution only requires that Domino’s receive fair notice of its legal duties, not a blueprint for compliance with its statutory obligations.”
The judges sent the case back for the lower court judge to decide whether Domino’s has complied with its obligations, saying “courts are perfectly capable of interpreting the meaning of ‘equal’ and ‘effective.’ ”
Domino’s and the business interests urging the court’s intervention said the decision in the 9th Circuit — which covers California and most of the western United States — was a game-changer.
“Virtually every national business and non-profit offers its goods and services at physical locations within the Ninth Circuit,” Domino’s tells the court, so its rule “will apply nationwide no matter what. No one can tailor their online presence to fit different rules in different circuits.”
But Eve Hill, a Baltimore attorney who has worked on website accessibility cases for the National Federation of the Blind and at Justice, said the decision “breaks no new ground.”
Courts across the country have found that websites and apps must comply with the ADA, she said. Companies may not like the message, but that doesn’t mean there is a need for the Supreme Court’s attention.
And she said the Justice Department’s inability to issue guidelines for compliance — it announced in 2017 that it was giving up the effort — does not mean companies are helpless. The lack of a national standard could be seen “as a feature, not a bug,” freeing companies to comply in different ways, Hill said.
In the Domino’s petition, and the accompanying amicus briefs, is a familiar battle between companies and lawyers who sue them.
Gregory G. Garre, representing the Chamber of Commerce, told the court that an “opportunistic plaintiff’s bar” has discovered “a lucrative sue-and-settle practice against businesses.”
“Businesses now face a rising sea of litigation that flows from one venue to another as plaintiffs’ lawyers seek out the most favorable local precedent, leaving companies unable to tell what standards they should meet in order to provide access and avoid liability,” he wrote.
Domino’s said the firm representing Robles has filed 14 suits on his behalf, and more than three dozen for a Montana resident. Joseph R. Manning Jr., the Newport Beach, Calif., lawyer who represents Robles, said in an email that he was not discussing the pending case.
He is due to respond to the pizza chain’s petition to the high court next month.
But Hill said the explosion in the number of lawsuits was simply a result of the explosion in new websites and apps.
Her client, the National Federation of the Blind, is not interested in “stick-up lawsuits,” she said, but securing companies’ compliance in opening the web to people with disabilities.
The case is Domino’s v. Robles.
Speaking from a legal standpoint, there is plenty of evidence to impeach Soetoro (birth certificate, Benghazi, Fast & Furious, capitulation towards UN wrt. Libya, ISIS crisis, Berghdal incident, fleeing from Iraq, Osamacare, border crisis, expansion of all government bureaucracies, absolutely anything to do wrt. Eric Holder, Marxism, Islam, Black Liberation Theology, atheism, abortion, gay agenda, promotion of the global warming fraud, refusal to wear flag pin, refusal to put hand over heart during Pledge of Allegiance, opposition to the flag burning amendment, and there’s probably a lot more). Sensible people can find the relative provisions in the Constitution which would impeach him.
Speaking from a political standpoint, keep in mind that the Dementocrats completely disprove of the Republican Party, so there is no political capital to be lost by legitimately pushing for impeachment. Moderates can be won over if they are exposed to the truths of the Hussein Administration. His disapproval rating is higher than his approval rating, meaning that impeachment can only be a success.
Speaking from a moral standpoint, Osama and the rest of the Dementocrats deserve to meet the same fate as the Rosenbergs did. We used to execute traitors, now we give them the Presidential office. If we don’t want to look like international laughingstocks, then that is our only option.
Responding to an article about Black residents leaving Austin
Between articles like these popping up near constantly and the rush of articles last week claiming that gay men are attacking black women and "stealing their cultural identity" I am just about tapped out on my sympathy to "racism".
I grew up in a small town that was very segregated. I was aware of racism and felt terrible about it. Now it is getting to the point that I don't care at all. I am tired of the "all white people are terrible" line of thought that permeates liberal spaces. My family immigrated from Germany to escape nazis. The other side of my family was Cherokee. None of my ancestors were slave owners and if they would have been, then that's not my fault.
Meanwhile I have to endure article after article, supposedly written by intelligent black thinkers, that tell me my very existence is racist.
You want to move to east austin? You are a racist gentrifier.
You want to move to the suburbs? You are a racist participating in white flight.
You have black friends? You are a racist collecting tokens.
Don't have black friends? You are a racist practicing ethic cleansing
Support affirmative action? You are a racist! You practice the racism of "lowered expectations" thinking the proud black race needs a helping hand and can't qualify on their own merits.
Don't support affirmative action? You're a racist! You are to scared to compete on a level playing field.
If you try to expand your horizons and immerse yourself in black culture? You're a racist! You are appropriating culture from the proud black woman!
If you don't know anything about black culture? You're a racist! You just like to whitewash society.
It's impossible to not be racist it seems, so I don't care anymore. The biggest killer of young black men are other black men. The biggest barrier to economic affluence and the greatest contributor to intergenerational poverty in the black community is the black cultures acceptance of ignorance and celebration of thug life. The most racist person I ever met was my black coworker Tatiana who used to get the shit beat out of her for getting good grades. That's right....doing well in school is considered "acting white", and as such she HATED "ignorant black people". But keep in mind....I never see articles from black writers saying how maybe black people need to step up and fix problems in their community. No...it's always the white mans fault.
And then let's not forget the brain trust that is the black feminist. In the 60s a bunch of gay drag queens got together and as a form of fighting back started to adopt speech and mannerisms over exaggerating females. Watch Paris is burning. The sashay. The "mmmhmmmm". The twirling of the head and rolling of the eyes? Gay men invented that. Then 50 years later an over indulged black woman says that gays actually stole that from HER people. And we need to cut it the hell out and get back in the closet.
Fuck her. Fuck people who say I am a racist simply because I exist. Why does the black intelligentsia of this country keep on alienating everyone and telling us we are evil and worthless? That right there should tell you how powerful black people have gotten. They now are secure enough that they don't care about allies. They shit on other minorities like the lgbt. And they insist they are the victims.
I am the most liberal person I know. I believe strongly in social justice. But I am so fucking sick of being called a racist.
Here, read the brilliance of the social justice warrior. This does more harm to liberal political causes then ann coulter and rush Limbaugh combined
A Mob Of Pro-Brexit Protesters Called Pro-Remain MP Anna Soubry A “Nazi” During A TV Interview
This is the latest incident to involve abuse hurled at Brexit-sceptic politicians and journalists outside the houses of parliament in the last few weeks.
Conservative MP Anna Soubry, a passionate opponent of Brexit, was forced to stop midway through a TV interview on Monday as a crowd of pro-Brexit supporters jeered “Soubry is a Nazi”.
Soubry was appearing live on the BBC News Channel, speaking to host Simon McCoy when the football terracestyle chant began.
As it grew in volume, Soubry stopped halfway through a sentence and said: “I do object to being called a Nazi, actually. I just think this astonishing, this is what has happened to our country. Anyway, let’s try and move on and be positive about things.”
Soubry, who has been publicly harangued by pro-Brexit protesters before, called on the police to “do their job” after the incident.
BuzzFeed News reported in December that broadcasters have hired private security firms for their broadcasts outside parliament, such is the threat from protesters.
Some of the protesters were wearing yellow vests, a symbol of anti-establishment protests in France that has since been adopted by nationalist, right-wing groups in Britain.
And according to this footage, after the interview the same protesters then followed Soubry, continuing to harass and abuse her as she made her way back to parliament.
Also on Monday, the pro-Corbyn columnist and activist Owen Jones was, not for the first time, accosted by what he described as Tommy Robinson supporters as he made his way through Westminster.
Labour MP Stephen Doughty brought up the Soubry incident in the House of Commons during a debate on Brexit.
“Mr Speaker, before I ask my question, can I draw your attention to some further serious events going on outside parliament today,” he said. “Intimidation, threats, potentially unlawful actions, targeting members of this house, members of the press, members of the public, and peaceful activists.
“Can I urge you to use your offices with the Metropolitan police at the highest level to ensure this is dealt with, it’s been repeatedly raised.”
Brexit secretary Stephen Barclay said he hadn’t seen the incident, but said that all MPs were aware of the fate of Jo Cox, the Labour MP who was murdered by a far-right terrorist in 2016.
“Anyone who stands at this despatch box is always mindful of the plaque of Jo Cox, which I know is so dear to many, particularly on the benches opposite, but across the house, and I think all of us would unite that wherever people are on the Brexit debate, is that all of us in this house should be able to air their views with respect.”
Commons speaker John Bercow later responded in the house: “I have been made aware of recent incidents involving aggressive and threatening behaviour towards members and others by assorted protesters who have donned the yellow vests used in France.”
“I am concerned at this stage, I say no more than that I am concerned at this stage, about what seems to be a pattern of protest targeted in particular I don't say exclusively but in particular at women.
“Female members, and in a number of cases I am advised female journalists, have been subjected to aggressive protest, and what many would regard as harassment. I can assure the house that I am keeping a close eye on events, and I will speak to those who advise me about these matters.”
As Stewart McDonald, SNP MP for Glasgow South, noted, this is all on the first day of the 2019 parliamentary session.
A viral video out of New York City shows a brown officer arresting a man for not social distancing, and then pulling a taser, tasing and attacking a bystander who talked shit to him. The footage is from East Village, where the blacks were allegedly having an illegal social gathering.
The cops, who look like gang members, one of them even with a flat-billed hat and a gross nigger-beard, were wrestling a man to the ground when another black standing there did the whole “he didn’t even do nothing” routine. This routine, usually ignored, triggered the anger of the gang member cop, and he tased him, started punching him in the head, tackled him and arrested him as well.
“What you flexing for? Don’t flex,” the thug cop warns the man before the attack.
While he’s on top of the man, the nigger-beard thug cop yells “das rite” at the rest of the crowd.
The man who took the video, Daquan Owens, says that people were social distancing, and the cops were just picking on them. “They were social distancing,” Owens told The Gothamist about the incident on Sunday. “The girl was standing by the phone booth, the guy was sitting on a milk crate. When the cops pulled up she said he’s not doing anything. They grabbed her and started tussling with her. Then the guy on the milk crate got mad and started yelling at police.” It doesn’t really matter if they were social distancing or not, because this is not a real law, and no one should have to do this bullshit. It’s dumb.
If you’re watching this and thinking “haha, niggers,” then you’ve got another thing coming. These thug cops are going to treat you just like the niggers. This is the dawn of a new police state, and of course they’re trying out their new powers to just beat the shit out of people randomly on the street on the blacks. In another couple of months, this is going to be a scene on every street that doesn’t even make you blink. Because this is not about a virus. This is about creating insane new social rules that no one can possibly follow, which allow the cops to attack you randomly on the street and keep you in a state of constant fear.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine this fat tattooed nigger sitting on your body, punching you in the head, forever.
"... May I say something here? Your space program is stupid and part of the "UFO" cover-up! You have had "flying saucers" since WW II. With our help, you have earth folks on Mars inside that planet at this time. You know the situation of Mars, and have no need to put those little Rovers on it.
"What is amazing is that some of your scientists, that are doing this work, are kept from awareness of us, or told that they will die, if they mention this. You have personnel on the moon.
"You had 2 moons once. They were brought down by the BBB & G’s [Big Bad Boys and Girls] long ago, and used to take out Atlantis and Lemuria. Atlantis was an accident. They intended the moon to destroy China. They miscalculated. Your moon is artificial, constructed in Orion, and towed to earth.
"It will be used elsewhere after your natural moons are restored. Your scientists are currently reporting a new moon that circles earth about every 80 days, and another quite a bit father out. These are our creations, not artificial, but from the Asteroid Belt."
[Response to a comic mocking Pick-Up Artists and the practice of tearing down a woman's self esteem to make her vulnerable]
This is bullshit. So we are suppose to equate ANY AND ALL attempts to pick up, go out with, or otherwise "score" with a girl as misogyny against or objectification of women? Further, we are also suppose to believe that acting on these ideas is simply a mental defect in our brains completely insurmountable; ie. If you cannot get a girlfriend, its because there is something wrong with your brain?
In an ideal world you'd be able to be honest and straight with women about your intentions and eventually everything would work out. Do you want to date? You would get a simple yes/no answer. You want casual sex? Also a yes/no answer. ANY guy who has put himself out there knows this peaches and roses scenario does not exist and never will. You have to be cool. You have to be smooth. You have to pretend not to care. You have to flirt. You have to act natural at the same time. etc.
He does not realize it but the "pick-up artist" of this comic is actually the winner here. This woman he's taken an interest in has proven herself to be an utter bitch. Better to be single than to be with a stuck-up snot who believes in some sort of genetic superiority based on intellect (the foundation of said belief being completely rooted in pseudo-science).
With all due respect- actually, fuck that. Fuck you, Randall. I don't care if I get banned since I don't care to read your comic EVER again. This is too close to home. Bookmark deleted; no more recommendations.
California! Go to the Damn Beach!
I sure wish Californians would go back to being the badass Californians I remember from back in January. I mean, why are surfers who aren’t afraid to swim with great white sharks afraid of that snake’eyed pantywaist Newsom, or some bully donut eater who’s probably had the Vrill proboscis treatment?
That reminds me…yesterday there was a video that went viral on the internet of a male nursing home attendant beating up an old man. The Q people went after this guy and within hours the Detroit police had him under arrest. Which is really good, but you gotta wonder what kind of a person would do that??? And film himself like he’s proud of it or something and then put it up on the internet? Well if you ask me that question I’d say NO kinda person would do that. But a proboscused bug-brain sure would. They love being bullies, and they love showing off how they can get away with being bullies.
And I think that’s all that’s happening in California where the bullies are getting away with beating up the Californians, who now the rest of the country is making fun of because they won’t just get up and go to the d*mn beach.
I myself have had the corona so now I’ve got the antigen in my blood, which I could donate to someone else who needed it. And that’s the thing about this dumb quarantine policy. Wouldn’t it be better to just let the corona spread around naturally so more and more people can get it and become immune? And become plasma donors to the dwindling numbers of infected people? Like with the chickenpox? I think instead of those ridiculous facemasks we should have little pins that say “I’ve got the antigen and I’m a donor!”
It’s time to move on from this foolish facemask thing.
Now I don’t claim to know the motive behind this wicked demand, but can’t you just feel the divisiveness in making people keep themselves six feet away from each other, just so they don’t pass cooties back and forth? It’s the very definition of evil! And it stuns me that people are willing to do this! Would God have you separated from your brothers and sisters like this? NO!!!!!!!!
Friends, please stop agreeing to that.
Please stop listening to a person who has absolutely ZERO interest in your well-being. She is only trying to continue manipulating people into unintentionally committing a sin, and that’s exactly what it is. I’m sorry, but it’s a sin to our humanity when you agree to that crap.
Go to the beach and hug the snot out of every person you see. Maybe even kiss ‘em. That’s what God would have you do.
(after inflicting a graphic abortion video on someone)
"I don't see what your screen shot will prove."
That pro-aborts are really delusional - and deniers par excellence! :-)
"And what about the '60 million babies killed' every time you wank into a kleenex or get oral sex."
Now Ann thinks that snot and sperm are human beings! Another screen shot demonstrating the scientific illiteracy of pro-aborts. Thank you, Ann - you are the gift that keeps on giving. I am going to see if DISQUS will keep a rolling tally of pro-aborts converted to pro-life when they read your comments.
"You claim to have some magical psychic ability that allows you to magically tell medical facts merely by looking at a picture."
It is called a biology textbook actually - no magic required. :-) You should read one sometime, before you call snot and sperm "babies."
Ann, nothing you say is going to erase that video from your mind - it is there for the duration. It's just a question of what you do with it: defend it and you continue to delude yourself and inflict more harm on your self. Embrace it and there is hope for change.
Last week, InfoWars broadcaster Alex Jones went into yet another rant about Bernie Sanders, alleging that the Vermont senator and Democratic presidential candidate “wants us to live under the heavenly socialist-communist system like China.”
He said that Sanders’ campaign is catching on because “stupid, snot-nosed, crud” liberals adore Mao Zedong while they “live off the backs of everybody that fought Nazism and communism.”
“You need to have your jaws broken,” Jones said. “But don’t you worry, reality is going to crash in on you trash who lowered our defenses, who brought the republic down. Oh, we’re already gone and you celebrate it like you’ve joined the globalists, mounting America’s head on the wall, your great victory.”
Jones then depicted Sanders and his “pathetic scum” supporters as mentally disabled, before arguing that Sanders voters are “the ultimate chumps, the ultimate buffoons, the ultimate schmucks” who will “burn in the camps.”
Both the Bundy and Hammond Ranch affairs is about control of significant amounts of uranium and the BLM is willing to shed blood in order to procure this uranium for very nefarious purposes.
This article will unequivocally implicate Hillary Clinton in her role of deliberately committing abject treason against the people of the United States through the illegal appropriation of uranium, at both the Bundy and the Hammond ranches and then selling the uranium to the Russians in order to help fund her presidential run through a largely untraceable offshore account.
...A former key member of the Obama administration and current Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, has proven herself to be the Ethel Rosenberg of her generation. You may recall your U.S. history as Ethel Rosenberg sold nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. In an act every bit as egregious as Ethel Rosenberg’s treason, Hillary Clinton sold uranium to the Russians while serving as the Secretary of State. Ironically, the original source on this treasonous act committed by Clinton was none other than the liberal rag we call the New York Times.
The proof is undeniable that Hillary Clinton committed the treasonous act of selling uranium to the Russians while Secretary of State, as reported in the New York Times. The Russian blood money, as reported, is being held in an offshore account and is being used to fund her run for the Presidency.
This is not going to be quick.
" - If COVID-19 isn't dangerous, then why are there SO MANY people dying from it in coutnries such as the USA and Italy? "
More than that die every year from influenza. Your being lied to. The numbers are estimated to be a minimum of 25% INFLATED BASED ON EXPOSED OVER REPORTING, FALSE REPORTING AND COMORBIDITY REPORTS. They bring a guy in, What happened? He was attacked by a tiger. Test him for Covid. Yep, cause of death, "Covid 19", check. That alone should be enough for you but no you've been hooked up to the propaganda teat too long. Another example, my kid works at a UPS hub, shit from all over the planet. People there got sick, just like last year. People pushed through the sickness with antihistamines, just like last year. None of them died on a ventilator in a hospital, they still work there... just like last year.
" Social distancing, as well as good hygeine and stopping people from touching absolutely everything, "
You are an idiot... there's no nice way to put this. Social Distancing is complete bullshit. People in Walmart, customer & employee touch EVERYTHING. A virus does not come on a fucking 6' leash. Everything I postulate is self evident. A person only has to rationalize. WE ARE COVERED WITH MICROORGANISMS. This is normal and healthy.
This next part is just sad and sick. You actually think like this. " we have been allowed to go outside the house, do exercise (even if it's just in the backyard) ..."
ALLOWED??? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME??? No one "allows" me to do anything. It's my natural born right to keep right on going anywhere I went yesterday. That you would even tolerate someone telling you what you're "allowed" to do in that respect is again, sad & sick.
" rather, you are protecting others when you stop your COVID breath from going onto others " Surgical masks, bandanas, folded paper towels filter nothing. No Seal = No Filter should be obvious to you. Yet instead you behave as you feel, not as you know logic dictates. Someone "in authority" tells you to do it & so you do obediently even when you know a virus can pass through and around the material. Even you know that it filters nothing you'll continue to behave as you've been "made to feel safe" by a lying talking head on "TV" and a useless token face diaper.
America was founded on DISobedience, (not on "slavery" as our leftist rewritten history books now teach). That's the reason we still have what little freedoms we have here today. Not enough of us are foolish enough yet to let them disarm us. When's the last time you broke down your AR much less did a little training? Over here we build our own firearms LEGALLY. Now THAT'S freedom. It's also a good insulator against the corrupt and overpowered government we face in all countries today.
You're bragging about "obedience" of all things, qualifying it by pointing out what you're "allowed" to do and thinking of it as some token reward you earned. "OBEYED their governments and are and are being rewarded with their COVID-19 restrictions being taken down". Spoken like a true slave. You did what you're trained to do and you got a treat for it so you'll do it again next time your master tells you when & where you can go potty & when & where you can't.
Of course it's a scam. Holy shit they tried to attach every fucking Green New Deal agenda to the C19 false flag. It was practically an identical grocery list. That stunt was more obvious than a kid caught up to his elbow in a cookie jar and chocolate chip smears on his face.
Agendas evidencing the true purpose of C19 include but are not limited to: 5G push, intense ramping up of ever increasing surveillance of the common citizen. That one alone is enough but there's more: "Social distancing" is just testing our obedience and training us to fear contacting each other. It also provides the needed 6' margin between individuals that just happens to be the margin needed to differentiate between us via satellite surveillance. VAXXINES Has on one learned anything from what Bill & Linda, the CDC, the WHO and other vaxx pushing organizations have done to kill and sterilze people in Africa and India? Vaxxines are how you get autoimmune diseases. So what's the solution? More vaxxines that WEAKEN or DAMAGE our immune systems along with major components of our governing hormonal systems such as: pituitary, prostate, thyroid, thymus and many more glands. ID2020 chipping/dyeing/dna altering vaxxines are in no way good things. Do you really like the idea of your whereabouts and activities being constantly monitored? Your exact location known 24/ 7? Those who fall for the transhumanism movement will have their biometrics monitored constantly. The attack on us is as much psychological as it is physical.
Do you like Planned Parenthood? Hope so because that's where the gallons of albumin come from to manufacture those health sabotaging vaxxxines you beg them to control you with. Newsflash: It's not being harvested from the Planned Parenthood Chicken Ranch or the Planned Parenthood Calf Abortion Clinic. We are so far past Christianity's whining chorus of "they're killing babies". Our "dead babies" are PRODUCTS. Yes, Planned Parenthood routinely, daily, fills orders listing things like "complete left leg". Do you have any idea of the dollar amount attached to a pile of harvested dead baby parts? You think those eugenics motherfuckers are just throwing all those valuable parts & fluids in a biohazard dumpster for sterile destruction?
I'm stopping here because that list goes on forever.
" And even when we couldn't do the things we wanted to do normally, we were given alternatives (Houseparty, Zoom, Internet, Online Shopping) to replace what we had taken from us. " again, a slave happy with the garbage master slopped you with. It doesn't even occur to you that none of those things are good for us. Jerking off online does not bring people together. "Gathered apart"??? What sort of drone could find such a ridiculous load of shit suggestion even acceptable? Every option you described is social masturbation, an empty and pathetic pacifier compared to the nutritious titty of real life. The movement to literally repress natural breastfeeding and make mothers and babies dependent on bottle feeding, thus depriving babies of their first NATURAL vaccination, antibodies from mother's milk was put into place decades ago and today we see the effects. Scared sheep with weakened immune systems.
" However, when people disobeyed, such as the United States, the consequences hit them hard. *cough* high death toll *cough* You're just wrong, wrong and stupid. I'm HERE. There's NOTHING GOING ON. It's all overreporting bullshit. My not dead, UPS contaminated kid is evidence. I've been out in this big scary C19 contaminated world the entire time, jogging, doing whatever, going wherever. Not dead yet. I still met weekly with my friends and groups in Dallas. So far I haven't even found a single person sick with C19. No one I know knows anyone with C19. That's 2 tiers deep in people getting into the 100's and no C19. Where's my epidemic? Where's my disease? They promised me pestilence and likely death and I can't even get the snots. Incidentally all my annual sinus infections stopped cold turkey when I started taking care of my health instead of living off depopulation food and box o' wine. The only sickness I've had in years was food poisoning, (bad chicken). No vaxxinations for 2 decades now.
Here's some numbers for you . Less than 1/10,000 die from C19. 9/10 deaths are over age 65. 90% of those infected experience little or no symtoms. You're probably actually scared by that. THAT'S what HERD IMMUNITY IS. America has a few hot spots, everybody did and that's all you're seeing because that's all the Globalist owned media shows you.
Why the hell would I be afraid of something less dangerous than our annual flu.
Another piece of the puzzle. The hydrochloroquine study was sabotaged. It was only given to patients who were already on death's doorstep. They literally gave it only to patients who were on the way out to fuck the study. Why would they keep a tested, proven and effective treatment like hydrochloroquine from us? So we'll line up and let them stick our ass with unsafe, (no double blind study done to evidence vaxxine safety ever), heavy metal contaminated, tracking chip included, vaxxines.
Simply put we find the obvious underlying theme of you post is "OBEY, OBEY, OBEY". If you cannot look at the agendas being pushed down your throat and not recognize the "Create the crisis, provide the solution" dictoral takeover tactics I don't know what to tell you.
So many things I heard about over the years and dismissed, just like I was trained to do, vaxxine dangers, GMOs, fluoride neurotoxin, all I ignored for most of my life. I've learned late that there most certainly is truth to all those issues and many more connected to them. Make no mistake, there is disinfo mingled in, makes effective camouflage for the truth.
In the end a person recognizes all these things I talk about here, not because some talking head told us, not because of any single scrap of so called "evidence" that idiots will endlessly corrupt, twist & misepresent, but because it really is self evident. It's as obvious as the controlled demo of the Twin Towers and Building 7. A building collapse cannot reach terminal velocity. Resistance is present in a collapse and prevents that. There are a million & one pieces of "evidence" like that but because many allowed themselves to be programmed on 911 they still buy the "Aunt Jemima" joke put forth by NIST. You've never even seen an example of the rarest building failure in architectural history and even though you have the sense to know that nothing looks like a controlled demo BUT a controlled demo you're still wired to believe the false flag cover story. These things are self evident. One has only to pay attention.
Yes, the same group of families responsible for 911 designed C19 and a world of other dangerous pathogens, GMOs, dangerous vaxxines, 5G social police system in China being retailored for the United States. We've got rampant adult mental retardation in the US due to fluoride/lead issues PUT INTO in our drinking water. In the US if you're not detoxing you're being mentally retarded. Heavy metal neurotoxins are bad enough for our frontal lobe alone but damage to other organs, renal system, liver, etc. are not to be ignored.
Now that's a big pile of nasty highlights to think about. You have some unpleasant awakening to do. This world is not what they told you it is. What is in the box is not what's on the box. People have been compliant with the dumbing down of our species and many have lost the ability to rationalize for themselves making them dependent on believing what the talking heads tell them. What's in the box they give us is not good for us. This rabbit hole has no bottom.
Sincere good luck. You have a nasty hill to climb. Or you can go right on "obeying" without feeling a hitch. I spent well over a decade "waking". When I actually crossed that line, realization, it was not pleasant but things were finally put into perspective. I've hated being manipulated since I was a kid. I think that's what made me take issue with enough inconsistencies, lies & coverups to start seeing the greater beast. When a person wakes up to their first "deception", their first false flag, that's when we get our first skin of armor against the very real brainwashing that's going on globally. It's not pleasant realizing one has been tinkered with mentally but it's better than not realizing it.
Again, good luck.
Science is at war with religion. The conflict can be traced back to the Dark Ages, a period in which the church vigorously asserted dogma and persecuted anyone who questioned its authority, including scientific pioneers such as Galileo, Copernicus, and Bruno. Fortunately the Enlightenment came along in the eighteenth century and validated methods of acquiring knowledge through evidence and testing. These methods freed scientists to pursue truth without fear of recrimination from the church. Thus the scientific revolution was born. Yet the war between religion and science continues to this day.
If you believe this rendition of history, there’s a good chance you’ve been reading a public school textbook or the New Atheists. The idea that science and religion are at odds is a popular myth in our culture, perpetuated by news headlines like “God vs. Science” in Time magazine. Of the perceived conflict, Christopher Hitchens writes, “All attempts to reconcile faith with science and reason are consigned to failure and ridicule.” Richard Dawkins writes, “I am hostile to fundamentalist religion because it actively debauches the scientific enterprise It subverts science and saps the intellect.”
Although it is widely believed that science and Christianity are at odds, the opposite is actually true. There is no inherent conflict between Christianity and science. We don’t mean to suggest that religious antagonism to science has never existed. It has and does. But the history of science shows that such claims of antagonism are often exaggerated or unsubstantiated. “Once upon a time, back in the second half of the nineteenth century,” says Alister McGrath, “it was certainly possible to believe that science and religion were permanently at war This is now seen as a hopelessly outmoded historical stereotype that scholarship has totally discredited.”
The scientific enterprise as a sustained and organized movement emerged in Christian Europe. During the sixteenth century, people from every culture studied the natural world, and yet modern science emerged in Europe, a civilization primarily shaped by the Judeo-Christian world- view. Why? Because Christianity provided the philosophical foundation as well as the spiritual and practical motivation for doing science. The Christian worldview with its insistence on the orderliness of the universe, its emphasis on human reason, and its teaching that God is glorified as we seek to understand his creation laid the foundation for the modern scientific revolution.
Most scientific pioneers were theists, including prominent figures such as Nicolaus Copernicus (14731543), Robert Boyle (16271691), Isaac Newton (16421727), Blaise Pascal (16231662), Johannes Kepler (15711630), Louis Pasteur (18221895), Francis Bacon (15611626), and Max Planck (18581947). Many of these pioneers intently pursued science because of their belief in the Christian God. Bacon believed the natural world was full of mysteries God meant for us to explore. Kepler wrote, “The chief aim of all investigations of the external world should be to discover the rational order which has been imposed on it by God, and which he revealed to us in the language of mathematics.” Newton believed his scientific discoveries offered convincing evidence for the existence and creativity of God. His favorite argument for design related to the solar system: “This most beautiful system of sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being.”
Christopher Hitchens discounts the religious convictions of these scientific pioneers, claiming that belief in God was the only option for a scientist of the time. But this puts Hitchens in a curious dilemma. If religious believers get no credit for their positive contributions to society (e.g., shaping modern science) because “everyone was religious,” then why should their mistakes, like atrocities committed in the name of God, discredit them? This is a double standard. One cannot deny religious believers credit on the basis of “everyone was religious” and also assign blame on the same foundation. To make the case that “religion poisons everything,” Hitchens has to ignore evidence to the contrary. And he is more than willing to do so.
Dawkins accepts that some early scientific pioneers may have been Christians, but he believes Christian scientists are now a rarity: “Great scientists who profess religion become harder to find through the twentieth century.” However, in the same year that Dawkins published The God Delusion (2006), three leading scientists released books favorable to theism. Harvard astronomer Owen Gingerich released God’s Universe, arguing that an individual can be both a scientist and a believer in intelligent design. Internationally renowned physicist Paul Davies published Goldilocks Enigma, in which he argued that intelligent life is the reason our universe exists. Francis Collins, former head of the Human Genome Project, published The Language of God, in which he presents scientific and philosophical evidence for God. Incidentally, President Barack Obama appointed Francis Collins as the director of the National Institutes for Health, one of the world’s foremost medical research centers.
Naming scientists whose Christian worldview motivated their work doesn’t settle the issue of how science and religion relate. Entire books have been written on how science and religion intersect. But we do hope you see that many early scientific pioneers, as well as cutting-edge scientists today, derived their motivation for scientific research from the belief that God created the world for us to investigate and enjoy. These scientists did not view Christianity as incompatible with science.
[From "YouTube Banned Me… Now What?"]
On Monday, July 13, YouTube terminated both my main channel and Roosh Hour Clips channel, deleting all my videos even though I did not have any existing community strikes. They also deleted all my personal favorites and playlists.
Since I don’t glorify violence against any group, I presume I was banned for “encouraging hatred” (i.e. speaking the truth) about sodomites who groom children and those who worship in the synagogues of Satan. It seems that my coded means to discuss the current purveyors of evil was not enough to keep my account in good standing, and so I was banned like many other dissidents before me, including Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes, Owen Benjamin, E. Michael Jones, Rick Wiles (TruNews), Gavin McInnes, Stefan Molyneux, and David Icke.
I choose the e-hermit option
When I originally joined YouTube, I never had to self-censor myself. I could say whatever I wanted as long as I didn’t promote violence. Once YouTube started partnering with Jewish groups such as the ADL, speech for everyone on the platform was progressively curtailed. Who is to say that won’t happen to another platform that today advertises “free speech”? Chinese-owned DLive seems fine now, but no one can make any guarantees of its future direction. Therefore I will not spend several years building myself up on a site that will arbitrarily cancel me.
From this point on, I intend to take the path of an e-hermit. I will hunker down onto my own domain and forum and host as much content as I can, including videos. There are dozens of cloud providers for video self-hosting instead of the two or three video platforms. Even if I get banned from every cloud provider in existence, I will simply rent dedicated servers from one of hundreds of hosting companies and serve videos that way. It will be significantly harder for them to stop me now.
To defray costs, I can take up the fashionable idea of charging $5/month for access. Perhaps I will leave my podcast free but save videos for members, and maybe I can throw up some bonus content as well. I’ll figure something out, but first I will begin work on establishing an archive for all my deleted videos (in the meantime, you can use Bitchute).
The report offers explanations for the rise in single mommery that reiterate most of what I’ve written on the topic: namely, female economic independence, State welfare as Daddy substitute, the Pill, and male economic stagnation are the big incentives fueling the increase, largely through the mechanism of reducing the number of fertile-age married women.
This is basically the “I don’t need no man, I’m an empowered careerist shrike” phenomenon, which, as you will read, created a premarital sexual market feedback loop encouraging men to demand sex from women without offering marriage in exchange.
The report authors conclude that the cause of the rise in single mommery is NOT primarily a consequence of negative economic trends. Instead, they blame affluence for weakened family stability.
When women no longer needed marriage (because women were economically and reproductively self-sufficient), men no longer needed to barter marriage for sex. Now where have you read that before? Oh yeah ..HERE. [Link is to a CH post from 2008]
There is a contingent of tradcon-ish righties who balk at the idea that the State and the social norming of working women create disincentives for women to marry; but here we are, data in hand showing exactly that.
The report authors conclude that male economic fortunes aren’t the main cause of the decreasing marriage rate (and subsequent rise in the single mommery rate). However, I note that the authors make the critical analysis error of ignoring the reality and impact of female hypergamy. This is a very common flaw in these studies, but it’s a critical flaw because women don’t judge the status of men in absolute terms; women judge the marriageability (the bux) and romantic worth (the fux) of men relative to other men AND relative TO WOMEN. Read on to see what I mean.
I’ll clear it up for the authors: Hypergamy. As women have seen their career prospects and personal incomes rise, economically stagnating men have been hardest hit by women’s innate desire for higher status mates. A working class man is a catch for a jobless single woman, but he brings nothing to a working woman who already has her basic needs met. And as women rise occupationally and financially, their attraction for higher status men than themselves rises along with their own economic status. This leads to working women choosing men based on non-provider mate value cues, or choosing to drop out of the marriage hunt altogether.
I’ve mentioned this before [indeed you have]: working women disincentivize male resource provision (there are those sexual market feedback loops again), and the corollary to that is economically vulnerable women incentivize male resource provision.
Ensuring the economic self-sufficiency of women has created the single mom crisis.
On this subject, I’m a pessimist. Good times create and all that. First, there’s the loss of purpose that accompanies the Automated Life. This hits men especially hard, because men, unlike women, don’t primarily get their sense of purpose from raising children and chatting up the neighbors hoping for gossipy dirt. Men get their purpose from work, from achievement, and (yes) from sexual conquest.
This is just ridiculous :D
Want to laugh even harder? Go to any university website and have a look at the current research projects these gender studies PhD's are doing.
The Effects of 80's Punk Rock on Latino Women in Peru Ages 25 - 50 is an example. At my local uni. it's mostly studies about women in rock music. I can't think of any gender that has affected rock music less than women. Because oppression!! No because men are better at it. Both genders have their strengths, one of men's is music. Just a fact of life and there should be no shame in that.
When the people studying "biology" don't understand the basics of biology...
That stupid commie bitch professor Melissa Click of the University of Missouri (you remember, the "I need some muscle over here!" bitch,) did her PhD dissertation on 50 Shades of Gray. She also wrote about Twitter and Twilight's affects on millennial women's sexuality.
Missouri had the number one journalism school in the country at one point. Number one. And they were hiring social justice bitches like her to teach the next wave. Seriously, look at some of the goddamn utter drivel she has had published.
“Twitards and Tyler’s Van: Anti-fans, Twilight, and textuality.”
“Fifty Shades of postfeminism: Contextualizing readers’ reflections on the erotic romance series. In E. Levine (ed.) Feeling Feminine: Popular Culture for Women in the Early 21st Century.”
“It’s a good thing’: The commodification of femininity, affluence and whiteness in the Martha Stewart phenomenon.”
Academia is a fucking tragedy now. So glad I got out
omg, lol I work with a girl who has her Ph.D. in Feminist Studies (gag) I almost cant stand being around her. This is one degree I wouldnt want the debt from... oh, she also has a transgender daughter (born a son) who is SIX and gets embarrassed talking about how babies are made..
She has a son that she abuses.
That is not a coincidence that she has this degree and has a "trans" six year old. She did this to him. I would call CPS if I were you.
I'm aware this is a meme, however... this reminds me that the far left are sociopaths. They really don't value human life. Posturing and virtue signaling is what they are all about.
They are so conceited and self-centered they have lost the ability to 1) empathize with other humans that don't share their perspective identically, 2) admit they are wrong about anything ever, 3) be saved or salvaged
(Comment on the lovely bible story of Elisha who curses some kids that mocked him, causing two female bears to rip 42 of them apart)
I love that story! Even more today as I see the nasty little snots marching around in the streets today, having their temper tantrums because their person wasn't elected to Presidential Office. They are just as bad as these youth, sneering, mocking, shouting out rage and hate. Maybe some coyotes will invade the city and give some of them what they deserve. God Bless Trump.
Former child star and heart throb of the TV show Growing Pains, Kirk Cameron, has apparently morphed into a giver of marriage advice that seems to come from a different decade.
The actor-turned-Christian evangelist had some of this advice this week, telling the Christian Post that women should “follow” their husbands’ leadership.
“Wives are to honor and respect and follow their husband’s lead, not to tell their husband how he ought to be a better husband,” he opined. “When each person gets their part right, regardless of how their spouse is treating them, there is hope for real change in their marriage.”
He added, “A lot of people don’t know that marriage comes with instructions. And, we find them right there in God’s word.”
Cameron has six children with his wife and fellow actress, Chelsea Noble, according to the Post.
This point of view isn’t unique to Cameron, the Friendly Atheist points out.
“He’s only expressing what most churches still preach on a weekly basis, what has been the common theme of Biblical marriage for thousands of years, and is still part of most wedding ceremonies today, reminding wives to, submit to your husbands in every way,'” Horus Gilgamesh writes. “Did the secular world really not have any idea that this type of inequality is readily taught in scripture and practiced in Christian households around the world?”
Cameron’s sister, Candace Cameron Bruce, also actively promotes the idea that wives should be submissive to husbands.
“The definition I’m using with the word submissive’ is the biblical definition of that,” Bure, who starred in the sitcom “Full House,” wrote in her 2014 book. “So, it is meekness, it is not weakness. It is strength under control, it is bridled strength. And that’s what I choose to have in my marriage.”
Hot off the presses, a criminally patriarchal research paper has concluded that men with higher income and status have more reproductive success than women with high income and status have in industrialized nations. First, to set the table, an excerpt from the abstract:
It is concluded that an evolutionary perspective helps explain reproductive patterns in modern humans and may thus make a valuable contribution in the assessment of urgent contemporary problems.
The sexual market is the one market to rule them all, across space and time.
Le 156% Heartiste
[Tweet by Rolf Degen]
Contrary to women, men still convert higher income and status into greater reproductive success in industrialized nations.
Female hypergamy, female education, female economic self-sufficiency, low female fertility choose any four.
In terms of social and economic status, men date across and down, women date across and up. Industrialized societies filled with overeducated careerist shrikes make it more difficult for both men and women to find long-term reproductive partners. What the West has done is weaponize female hypergamy, so that the only winner in this zero sum mating game are the HSMV alpha males who can serially date and marry increasingly younger women.
In the modren West, overeducated, careerist women are DARWINIAN LOSERS. They now join the lonesome ranks of fat women, ugly women, and old spinsters. Lean in? Try barren quim.
Low status beta and omega males are bigger losers in this new world order than they were before under the rock solid pre-femcunt patriarchal system, because the women who would be theirs under the old rules have decided to skip past them for a shot at 1. the high status alpha or 2. a tub of ben and jerrys.
The biggest DARWINIAN WINNERS are the charming jerkboy cads and the sociopath hedge funders.
Potential fertility that’s a nerdy way to say “sexiness”. Men with high social and economic status in industrialized and primitive nations alike HSMV alphas monopolize the hottest babes, and probably more than their fair share of the plain janes too. The Pill and condom don’t thwart the sex act; those things just thwart the consequence of the sex act, and incentivize women to liberate their sexuality (which in practice means liberating themselves from beta males). Imagine how many little snot-nosed Heartistes (heartots?) would be running around creating kindergarten mayhem if the Industrial Contraception Complex didn’t exist.
How unequally is sex distributed in industrialized jizztopias? Very:
[image taken from a tweet by Rolf Degen]
There are interesting eugenic/dysgenic possibilities to ponder from this knowledge. There is dysgenic selection pressure on high status women at least as measured by income, social status, and their proxy, IQ but eugenic selection pressure on their male counterparts, the HSMV alphas who are having more kids.
This isn’t a complete picture, though, because female mate worth is so much more tied into their physical beauty. Those HSMV alpha males are choosing less educated, less wealthy, lower SES “status” women who are younger, hotter, tighter, so by Darwinian calculation the end result is very eugenic: capable sons and pretty daughters. This is evidence that the West is beginning to pursue the patented CH BOSSS strategy of sexual market health and societal reinvigoration.
I’ve been warning about this stuff for a while, and I’m glad to see ¡SCIENCE! finally catching up with Heartistian observations. There was only ever going to be one effective response by men to the emergence of weaponized female hypergamy (and it wasn’t cuddly beta supplication).
Game will save the West .in one respect, by heightening its late stage contradictions and encouraging a change in course.
On the silliness of the “wage gap”:
[Tweets in quotes blocks, each line by a different account]
"On the next edition of "Who Gives A Shit"..."
A lot of people apparently, because that could be a component of the so called "wage gap", ie men have very important reasons to make more money/status.]
and the silliness of the feminist narrative about the “patriarchy”:
Science is descriptive, not prescriptive. It also goes against the feminist narrative that the patriarchy stops women from succeeding. No, men simply have more incentive to work high effort/high status jobs. Therefore the priorities of women and men are different.
Here's why Bull-Queers & Jews are a Dangerous Combination...
The Nazi party was founded by homosexuals. The Bratwurstgloeckl, a tavern frequented by homosexual roughnecks, is where Rohm joined the handful of sexual deviants (and occultists).
It was no coincidence that homosexuals were among those who founded the Nazi Party. In fact, the party grew out of a number of groups in Germany which were centers of homosexual activity and activism.
But it was not just the Nazi party Homosexuals...
Bull-Queer - Churchill met with Hitler as a young man and allegedly had Butt-Sex with him?
[link to i.imgur.com]
They were Bull-Queer, homosexual Pals.
Field Marshal Montgomery was a Homosexual.
Hitler was the Bastard Spawn of Jew-Banksters...
Hitlers Mother worked as a "Housekeeper" for a German-Jew Banker.
References to follow...
Thread: Hitler - A different perspective - Catholic Church - "Hitler Youth" = Diddle Little Boys
There are at least four women, including his own niece, with whom Hitler had sexual relationships, although these relationships were not normal. Both Waite and Langer suggest that his sexual encounters with women included expressions of his coprophilic perversion as well as other extremely degrading forms of masochism.
It is interesting to note that all four women attempted suicide after becoming sexually involved with Hitler.
Jewish historian by the name of Samuel Igra...
claims that Hitler:
"had been a male prostetute in Vienna at the time of his sojourn there, from 1907 to 1912, and that he practiced the same calling in Munich from 1912 to 1914"
says Hitler is listed as a homosexual in Viennese police records.
Walter Langer, that during several of those years Hitler chose to live in a Vienna flophouse known to be
inhabited by many homosexuals.
Frank Rector writes that, as a young man, Hitler was often called der schoen Adolf (the handsome Adolf) and later his looks were also to some extent helpful in gaining big-money support from Ernst Rohms circle of wealthy JEW gay friends.
A psychological profile of Hitler. His report, kept under wraps for 29 years...
Langer writes that Hitler was certainly a coprophile (a person who is sexually aroused by human excrement) and may have practiced homosexuality as an adult.
He cites the testimony of Hermann Rauschning, a former Hitler confidant who, reports that he has met two boys who claimed that they were Hitlers homosexual partners.
Hitler calls Foerster Bubi, which is a common nickname employed by homosexuals in addressing their partners [back then].
Hitler derives sexual pleasure from looking at mens bodies and associating with homosexuals.
A well-known fact is that Hitlers greatest hero was Frederick the Great, a well-known homosexual.
Hitler was closely associated with Ernst Rohm and Rudolf Hess, two homosexuals who were among the very few people with whom he used the familiar "du" in speaking.
Hitler left the prison he fretted about his friend who languished there, and spoke of him tenderly, using Austrian diminutives: Ach mein Rudy, mein Hesserl
Whenever Hitler got a present he liked or drew an architectural sketch that particularly pleased him, he would run to Hess who was known in homosexual circles as Frauline Anna as a little boy would run to his mother to show his prize to her.
One of Hitlers prized possessions was a handwritten love letter which King Ludwig II had written to a manservant.
Hitler seemed to prefer homosexual companions and coworkers. In addition to Rohm and Hess, two of his closest friends, Hitler filled key positions with known or suspected homosexuals.
Reportedly, Hitler Youth leader, Baldur Von Schirach was bisexual; Hitlers private attorney, Reich Legal Director, Minister of Justice.
Governor-General of Poland, and public gay-hater Hans Frank was said to be a homosexual;
Hitlers adjutant Wilhelm Bruckner was said to be bisexual;
Walter Funk, Reich minister of Economics [and Hitlers personal financial advisor] has frequently been called a notorious homosexual or as a jealous predessesor in Funks post, Hjalmar Schacht, contemptuously claimed, Funk was a harmless homosexual and alchoholic;
[Hitlers second in command] Hermann Goering liked to dress up in drag and wear campy make-up;
SS Chief Heinrich Himmlers pederastic proclivities [were] captured on film by Nazi film maker Walter Frenze.
Igra, states that Hitlers chauffeur and one-time personal secretary, Emile Maurice, was a homosexual.
Moreover, even more interesting is this, Julius Streicher, the notorious Jew-baiter, was originally a school teacher, but was dismissed by the Nuremberg School Authorities, following numerous charges of pederasty brought against him.
Reinhard Heydrich, was homosexual.
Richard Grunberger tells of a party given by Nazi propagandist, Joseph Goebbels, which degenerated into a homosexual orgy.
A recent biography of Albert Speer by Gitta Sereny speaks of a homo-erotic relationship.
Hitlers personal bodygaurds were almost always 100 percent homosexuals.
The Nazi party was founded by homosexuals. The Bratwurstgloeckl, a tavern frequented by homosexual roughnecks, is where Rohm joined the handful of sexual deviants (and occultists).
It was no coincidence that homosexuals were among those who founded the Nazi Party. In fact, the party grew out of a number of groups in Germany which were centers of homosexual activity and activism.
Nietzsche was dubbed the Father of National Socialism.
Nietzsche is probably more deserving of this distinction, being so labeled by Nazi luminaries Dr. Alfred Rosenberg and Dr. Frank. Others have called him the Father of Fascism. Rabidly
anti-Christian and a homosexual, Nietzsche founded the God is dead movement and contributed to the development of existentialist philosophy.
Nietzsches publisher, Peter Gast, called Nietzsche one of the fiercest anti-Christians and atheists.
Nietzsche never married, and had no known female sex partners, but went insane at age 44 from syphilis and eventually died of it. According to Sigmund Freud
and Carl Jung, Nietzsche had caught the disease at a homosexual brothel in Genoa, Italy.
The extended-arm Seig Heil salute, for example, was a ritual of the Wandervoegel (Wandering Birds or Rovers), a male youth society that became the German equivalent of the Boy Scouts.
The Wandervoegel was started in the late 1800s by a group of homosexual teenagers. Its first adult leader, Karl Fischer, called himself der Fuehrer (the Leader).
Hans Blueher, a homosexual Nazi philosopher and important early member of the Wandervoegel, incited a sensation in 1912 with the publication of The German Wandervoegel Movement as an Erotic
Phenomenon, which told how the movement had become one in which young boys could be introduced into the homosexual lifestyle.
The Wandervoegel and other youth organizations were later merged into the Hitler Youth, which itself became known among the populace as the Homo Youth because of rampant homosexuality.
Sturmabteilung (Storm Troopers, the SA) were largely the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach.
Rossbach, who historian Gruber says was a open homosexual, formed the Rossbachbund (Rossbach Brotherhood), a homosexual unit of the Freikorps (Free Corps).
Rossbach also formed a youth organization under the Rossbuchbund, calling it the SchilljugendSchill Youth).
Rossbachs staff assistant, Lieutenant Edmund Heines, a pederast and murderer, was put in charge of the Schilljugend.
All played on the same team...
Jews & Bull-Queers - Verses - The World
Working together to exterminate the Christian, Protestant, Puritan, Separatist...
Winston Churchill was a member of the Freemasons, and a member of the Loyal Waterloo Lodge of the National Independent Order of Odd Fellows.
"Freemasons" a Jew controlled organization...
"Order of Odd Fellows" = Bull-Queer, Pederast...
For some reason, the deliberately-injected moral and mental cancer of libtardation has always seemed to metastasize faster in the Nordic countries, particularly Scandinavian ones. This phenomenon is also observable among the American descendants of Scandinavian immigrants in places like Minnesota and Wisconsin. Our hypothesis is that the innate, perhaps even genetic, altruism and human compassion of Nordic folk renders them more vulnerable to manipulation of both the heart and mind.
Though the reason for advanced Scandinavian libtardism may not be concrete; one thing is for certain - Sweden has got to be the insanest of the Scandinavian insane asylums. And the opening few lines of this Slimes article confirm that fact.
1 & 2: Swedish school boys sometimes put on dresses in order to mock traditional gender roles. 3. The "gender-neutral" daddies of Sweden get three months of "paternity leave"(Damn! I only took one day off after my kids were born.)
Slimes: Something was wrong with the Penguins, the incoming class of toddlers at the Seafarer’s Preschool, in a wooded suburb south of Stockholm. The boys were clamorous and physical. They shouted and hit. The girls held up their arms and whimpered to be picked up.
Analysis: Oh what horrors! Boys being boys and girls being sensitive and affectionate.
Slimes: The group of 1 and 2-year-olds had, in other words, split along traditional gender lines. And at this school, that is not O.K."
Analysis: So, by imposing levels of taxation so burdensome on working fathers that 90% of new mothers must return to the work force just to keep food on the table, the gentle communists of Sweden are able to kidnap "1 and 2-year-olds" and then re-engineer out of them certain traits that God had clearly programmed into their DNA --- and that they had already been healthily manifesting.
1. (Times Caption) Elin Gerdin, 26, attended one of Sweden’s first preschools focused on gender equality. She said she gets upset when looking at photos of friends’ babies, with boys dressed in blue and girls in pink. 2. The state curriculum in the new "diverse" Sweden urges teachers -- with no input from parents -- to “counteract traditional gender roles and gender patterns”
More Marxist madness:
Slimes: Their teachers cleared the room of cars and dolls. They put the boys in charge of the play kitchen. They made the girls practice shouting “No!” Then they decided to open a proper investigation, erecting video cameras in the classroom.
Analysis: They are turning Swedish boys into Justin Trudeau-type pussies of tomorrow; and Swedish girls in the nasty Merkel-like harridans of the future.
Slimes: Science may still be divided over whether gender differences are rooted in biology or culture, ...
Analysis: Science is "divided" over "gender differences" alright -- between communist crackpots and those with common sense. As if it takes a "scientist" to discern that which is self-evident!
Slimes: ... but many of Sweden’s government-funded preschools are doing what they can to deconstruct them. State curriculum urges teachers and principals to embrace their role as social engineers, requiring them to “counteract traditional gender roles and gender patterns.”
Analysis: This is why American libtards love Sweden so much. From immigration to gun confiscation to speech restrictions to taxes to social policies, the "democratic" Marxist regime gets to do whatever the heck it bloody wants to.
Slimes: It is normal, in many Swedish preschools, for teachers to avoid referring to their students’ gender instead of “boys and girls,” they say “friends,” or call children by name. Play is organized to prevent children from sorting themselves by gender. A gender-neutral pronoun, “hen,” was introduced in 2012 and was swiftly absorbed into mainstream Swedish culture.
Analysis: "Hen?" Good Lord! Living under 1920's Stalinism seems preferable to being a Swede these days. At least the Bolsheviks didn't turn Russian boys into little pussies.
No "he" or "she" --- or "him" or "her" --- just "hen."
1. (Times Caption) A 3-year-old at the Seafarers’ School likes wearing dresses. His mother says no one in his life has told him boys don’t dress that way. 2. Swedish milennials were already screwed-up by state-imposed libtardation. Just imagine when the pre-schoolers raised under the new genderless policy grow up! 3. I know Thor, I know.
And now, the kicker: A commissar-like "gender expert," monitors both the instructors and the children for gender-neutral purity:
Slimes: Ms. Elis Storesund is on hand to confront classroom dilemmas: When boys in the group for 3-year-olds refused to paint, or dance, and the group threatened to split along gender lines, she was brought in to unpack the problem, tinkering with the activities until she coaxed the boys back to equal participation.
Analysis: You hear that?! The moment the magnetic pull of nature interferes with the demonic social engineering, the gender commissar is called in, the "problem" is "unpacked," and the innocent little boys are "coaxed" (coerced) back into insanity.
Slimes: “When we are drawing,” said Melisa Esteka, 31, one of the teachers, “we see that the girls they draw a lot they draw girls with lots of makeup and long eyelashes. It’s very clear that they are girls. We ask, Don’t boys have eyelashes?’ And they say, We know it is not like that in real life.’ -- Ms. Esteka looked frustrated. She had set a goal for herself: To stop the children from identifying things as “for girls” or “for boys.”
Analysis: Ms. Esteka belongs in a strait-jacket -- not a pre-school.
Slimes: Swedish children spend much of their early life in government-funded preschools, which offer care at nominal cost for up to 12 hours a day starting at the age of 1.
Analysis: What a dreadful society! The Swedish government lavishly funds all-day brainwashing centers for preschoolers as well as free food and housing for violent Turd world invaders -- but grants no such assistance to the tiny minority of mothers who stay home to raise their children.
Slimes: Two schools rolled out what was called a compensatory gender strategy. Boys and girls at the preschools were separated for part of the day and coached in traits associated with the other gender. Boys massaged each other’s feet. Girls were led in barefoot walks in the snow, and told to throw open the window and scream.
Analysis: Cheese & crackers! Ya just can't make this stuff up. This sad affair is actually a satire of itself.
According to the article, some of the parents have already complained that their little daughters have suddenly become defiantly mouthy and sassy due to the pre-school exercises. We wonder: how long before some of Sweden's few remaining sane parents are themselves put under observation by a visiting gender commissar? Seriously, these self-righteous lunatics need to be euthanized before they can destroy any more children.
Though the stupid libtards of Sweden may openly embrace this perverse form of child abuse due to their own brainwash-induced insanity, there is a much higher, clearer thinking power that is pushing this "gender neutrality" upon the West for a very strategic purpose. You see,
boys and girls, er, excuse me, "hen and hen" --it's very simple. To de-ball is to de-claw. And a nation of de-balled men is an obedient and passive nation that will accept anything and everything without so much as a whimper, let alone a rebellious fight. Thusly bereft (a $10 word for left without) of male physical protection and mental guidance, the "empowered" women -- also forced out of their natural roles -- soon go full retard as they deconstruct society along whatever insane and unnatural lines their hidden masters (cough cough) of The New World Order steer them to.
The Great One (that's Hitler for you newbies and normies) said it best:
"When man attempts to rebel against the iron logic of Nature, he comes into struggle with the principles to which he himself owes his existence as a man. And this attack must lead to his own doom.
Tell it, Great One, tell it!
It wasn't always like this, of course. Only decades ago, most young Swedish men were as manly as any American city tough or country good ol' boy, or any outback Aussie, or any toothless Canadian hockey player etc. So, what happened? Answer: "The Bad War" happened, that's what.
Though Sweden, despite Churchill's plotting, managed to stay out of World War II, it could not resist being sucked into the post-war political vortex of culturally decaying and rapidly uniting Globalist Europe. Yes, it always goes back to that horrible war -- the foundational event and foundational mythology which ended up, by design, enthroning deranged leftists and corruptible weaklings everywhere while birthing this sick world we exist in today. The defeat of The Great One spelled not just the cultural and racial doom of Germany, but also of Sweden -- which is why a number of foresighted Swedes had volunteered to fight for the German Waffen SS.
Oh if only those SS Swedes were here today -- in full youth, armed to teeth and turned loose to beat the bloody snot out of every last one of these insane child-abusing Marxist m-effers, and their beloved Turd World rapefugees too.
BEFORE THE DAYS OF "HEN"
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that gender-neutral Swedish pre-schools make the boys dance and play in the kitchen while the girls are taught to be assertive.
Boobus Americanus 2: Well, I'm all for equality, but that seems to be a bit much.
Sugar: Ya ssee that! Even by the libtarded sstandardss of Boobuss sshit-for-brainss, the frickin' Swedess have gone full-retard.
Editor: Nordic libtards are always about 10-15 years ahead of America on the road to hell -- which means we should expect this state-mandated "hen" nonsense to arrive here about 2030, if not sooner.
The leader of a group of black pastors opposed to gay marriage lashed out at President Barack Obama during a Tuesday appearance at the National Press Club. In his remarks, Rev. William Owens accused Obama of being “unprofessional” for ignoring him and insinuated that Obama had condoned child molestation by endorsing gay marriage.
“For the homosexual community and for the president to bow to the money as Judas did for Jesus Christ is a disgrace and we’re ashamed,” said Owens, the president and founder of the Coalition for African American Pastors.
“If you watch the men who have been caught having sex with little boys,” said Owens, “you will note that all of them will say that I was molested as a child. A man molested me in my home, wherever they will say they were molested. And for the president to condone this type thing knowing the full facts is just irresponsible.”
Owens added that the “president is in the White House because of the Civil Rights movement, and I was a leader in that. And I didn’t march one inch, one foot, one yard for a man to marry a man and a woman to marry a woman. So the president has forgotten the price that was paid where they gave their blood to have equal rights in the United States.”
Owens said that Obama endorsed gay marriage “because of money” and bellowed: “there are more people that want marriage to be right than there are homosexuals, I assure you, in this country, and I think he’s going to learn that lesson.”
The 5th Element is Aether
The legendary Fifth Element holds the key to the answer to one of today’s top mysteries in the worlds of physics and cosmology.
by Owen K Waters, Spiritual Dynamics
Scientists estimate that 84% of the matter in the universe is composed of invisible dark matter, but they have no idea what it is.
With a short venture into the world of metaphysics, you are about to find out the answer!
In ancient Greece, all material things were said to be composed of a mixture of the four elements of earth, fire, water and air. There was also said to be a more subtle, fifth element.
This was called the quintessence (literally, “fifth element”), implying its very delicate or refined state of existence.
For many centuries, philosophers considered that all matter consisted of combinations of the basic elements in the Greek tradition. In the early 1500s, Philip von Hohenheim boldly renamed himself Paracelsus, meaning “beyond the medical pioneer Celsus” and came out with a counter-proposal.
He declared that, instead of the old elements, all things consist of the subtle essences of elements that he called salt, sulfur and mercury.
However, this only served to confuse the situation further as both theories did little to identify the basic chemicals that combine to form the enormous variety of compounds that are found in nature.
Next, fast-forward to the Age of Enlightenment. In the late 1600s, the early scientist Robert Boyle published The Sceptical Chemist, rejecting both schools of thought in favor of the then-novel idea that materials are composed of a variety of basic chemicals which, unlike compounds, cannot be further reduced by chemical operations.
This demystified chemistry, laid the basis for its development as a science, and made possible the development of the table of elements that we use in chemistry today.
As the science of chemistry developed and accumulated physical knowledge, however, it became focused entirely on physical materials and ignored the old idea of anything more subtle.
The fifth element has been given various names in traditional Eastern thought and practices such as prana, chi, qi, and mana but it can be better understood by calling it vital life energy or etheric energy.
From a physics perspective, the most concise term is etheric energy, which implies a more subtle energy than electric energy.
When electric and magnetic energies combine in complementary motion, they produce physical light as well as the building blocks of physical matter. Your body is composed of electromagnetic energy. Etheric energy is actually more common in the universe than electric energy.
Its manifestation, etheric matter, forms most of the matter in the universe. Cosmologists know that it exists, even though they can’t see it (hence the term, dark matter), because of its gravitational effects on physical matter in the cosmos.
“Dark” energy and “dark” matter are roughly five times more prolific than their physical counterparts, so their influence in the cosmos is quite marked.
The gravitational effect is a result of the fact that both energies physical electric energy and the more subtle etheric energy share a common interaction with magnetic energy. The magnetic energy component is provided by the ever-present fabric of space, which I term the God Field.
By using the term the God field, we can reduce a common form of confusion that exists today. The God field was traditionally called the aether and, although that sounds a lot like etheric energy, the two are quite different.
The God field is the fabric of space. It is a subtle, fluid, magnetic energy which fills all space. It is intensified within and around matter, where its attractive nature produces the force of gravity.
Etheric energy, or vital life energy, is the primary energy of the universe. Electric energy is, by comparison, a secondary, more physical energy.
Electric energy interacts with the magnetic fabric of space to form physical light and physical matter. Etheric energy interacts with the magnetic fabric of space to form etheric light and etheric matter.
Etheric energy is a subtle, primary life energy, while electric energy is a physical, secondary energy. Both energies interact with the magnetic fabric of space, producing etheric matter and physical matter.
The great advantage with knowing about etheric energy is that this vital life-giving energy holds the key to vibrant wellness. Vital life energy or etheric energy is present in all effective healing systems.
In acupuncture, it is the “qi” energy that is enhanced or balanced in its flow along acupuncture meridians. It is the healing energy transmitted in distant healing. It is the same healing energy that is passed to the recipient in Reiki or Polarity Therapy.
Vital life energy is the essence within sacred healing oils. It is the energy that flows into a person as they practice Qigong. It is the life energy in organic foods, in water exposed to sunlight, and in the oxygen that we breathe.
Without vital life energy, we would not physically exist. With additional vital life energy, miraculous healing can occur.
i think you do not grasp biblical teaching and seek to charge God with things He did not do. Romans 5:12 tells us how death entered into the world via sin thus since God i snot sin He had nothing to do with it. Then you misunderstand the words in Genesis 1 'God saw all that He had made and it was good.' Obviously He did not reate disease, sin, or death.
disease organisms did not evolve but came as a result of the corruption that entered the world at Adam's sin. Ridley did an excellent job in pointing out the little bits of corruptiuon that affect the genetic code in his book Genome. He, of course, attributes that corruption's existence to the wrong source, just like you did, but he documents it quite well so that we can see what took place back in the Garden of Eden.
Let me illustrate: you build a wood table, you kep it inside from harms way and after a bit of time termites were allowed in. Did you create the termites to attack your table? Did you open the door to let them in? Would you like to be falsely accused of doing it even though it was your table and you thought it was good?
Think about it.
Five members of the same family were charged with the murder of a prophet who had been called to their their home in the village of Mazonde, Zimbabwe to help them cleanse their house of evil spirits.
According to local newspaper, Zed 24 News, the accused family identified as Leanmore Mutero, Tonderai Muswere, Michael Muchengeti, Manasa Mutero and Nicholas Mutero, appeared at the High Court in Harare facing a murder charge for participating in the death of self-professed Prophet Shamiso Kanyama, who accidentally died during a healing ceremony.
Pastor Kanyama had reportedly asked his followers to bury him alive so that he could summon more cleansing powers to heal the family that had been plagued by mysterious deaths.
Zed 24 News reports that High Court Justice Owen Tagu heard how on that day, the late pastor had been invited to attend the home in the Muzarabani district, which is situated along the Mozambique-Zimbabwe border, by their priest, Zvidzai Muchengeti.
The five men had requested the priest to help them clean their home of evil spirits, because it was causing mysterious deaths in their family.
Responding to their request to perform a healing ceremony, Kanyama had ordered his followers to dig a grave and bury him alive because that was the way he summoned more healing powers to ward off evil spirits. However, the plan backfired on the prophet when instead of being resurrected as he supposed, the men dug up the grave again to find him dead.
Kanyama helped to dig his own grave before praying and jumping inside, Father Zvidzai, who has turned State witness, told the High Court. He continued that after laying face down in the grave, he ordered his followers to start covering him with soil.
“He pegged a grave-shaped pit in front of my hut and asked for help to dig the pit,” Zvidzai continued. “Deceased requested to be buried alive so that he would gain power to drive away the evil forces.”
Fearing for the life of the prophet as the men were in the process of filling the grave, he requested the men to stop what they were doing, Joseph Taderera told Justice Tagu.
However, they ignored his pleas when Kanyama urged them to continue the process of burying him alive, stating that he would rise from the grave unharmed.
“I warned the men about the danger of their actions, but my advice fell on deaf ears because Kanyama shouted, telling me that I am disturbing his angels, and urged them to continue filling the grave, saying that he would later come out alive,” Taderera said.
[On Sadiq Khan backing Owen Smith for Labour leader]
.@SadiqKhan was elected to serve the people of London, but instead he spends his time writing articles to help his masters in Tel Aviv.
HEE HAW was one of the most godless and evil television shows ever produced; yet, many Christians watched it regularly because Roy Clark, Buck Owens, and others, sang a Gospel song towards the end of each show. During the rest of the show, much of what you saw was women's breasts exposed, whores laying in suggestive positions, dirty jokes, women wearing miniskirts, women being sensual, women and men flirting with each other, men looking at women's breasts, etc. It wasn't just clean fun. There's nothing "clean" about lasciviousness. Reprobate Playboy magazine founder, Hugh Hefner, even made guest appearances on the show. How wicked and sinful. The producers of Hee Haw were godless heathens who exploited Christianity to boost their ratings, and corrupted society. No doubt, Hee Haw destroyed many marriages and families with their whorish lascivious programming. The producers of Hee Haw have greatly contributed to the spiritual deterioration of America. To no surprise, some of the women who posed on Hee Haw have been featured in Playboy magazine. If you don't see the evil harm in a show such as Hee Haw, then you are not right with God!
Trump apologizes for "pussy grabbing" video]
Men being men saying vulgar things in private. And this is news? I am Christian and do not like this kind of gutter talk, but how does this stand in comparison to the corruption and scandal of the Clintons? Liberals openly push perversion and immorality with LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ, threaten our security by allowing untold millions to invade our country, and seek every opportunity to strip us of our God-given, Constitutionally defined rights of freedom of speech, religion, and self defense. In the scheme of things, Trump is still preferable to Clinton any day when it comes to leading this country. The only one who can save any individual or country is Jesus.
We know this was released at this time so Hillary can try to make this the focus of the debate. I think Trump should have a list of every Clinton scandal and start reading it every time she tries to bring this up.
God may have created orgniack life directly or he may had evolved it from inorganick life but nautral prososes there is nothing sicence or theologey can prove ither way God or nature that can make us absoultly certian same with our bodies God could have evolved it or could ave c reated it directly shurly the human body is a compartivaly samll thing to the universe the sole how ever can not evolve it is imosable no matter how many atoms u line up or how complacted u line them up u cant get awholy new thing caplbel of thingking and caring reason self aware ness ( there is sperit at the momet of conseption that is how cloning works ) awarness of the malerial universe is not one more part of taht universe sicence cant say jack about soles not Jack it snot some thing u can mesusre
So, Asian clustering brings more Asians. As for how the clustering will affect the city, one only needs to look to the other suburban Chinatowns in So Cal to see the result. Hacienda Heights, Rowland Heights, Diamond Bar, Walnut, City of Industry, Arcadia, Monterrey Park, San Marino, and San Gabriel are good places to find an answer. Obviously, when a racial tipping point is reached, whites and Hispanics move out, and the culture radically changes in those areas.
I am Caucasian and currently live in a suburban Chinatown in So Cal. This town is for all intents and purposes a Chinese territory on American soil. It is a self-serving Chinese community comprised of people who couldn't care less about diversity. The Chinese here snub their noses at the idea of the American melting pot -- many different people with one national identity. it's Chinese tribalism and Chinese thinking exported from one side of the world to the other. Why on earth would I want to live in such a place?
I can't blame the Chinese. After all, it is the U.S. government that gives tens of thousands of Chinese citizenship or permanent residency every year. No questions asked about their ill gotten gains from mainland China, all that crooked communist money. Also, it is the U.S. government that allows foreign nationals to own property and companies in America. The Chinese are just being Chinese; that's the way they are. Their socio-cultural isolationism obviously exports nicely. Like they say, you can take a Chinaman out of China but you can't take China out of a Chinaman. Just the other day I saw a Chinese guy snot rocketing onto the pavement in a parking lot. You know, Chinese people are made in China, so there's a quality control issue.
The History Channel had a 2 hour program called The Antichrist on the other day. Seemed to be a newer version than ones I've seen before, since it had Joel Rosenberg in it. It also had Hal Lindsey......and, ahem, Benny Hinn. Nothing really enlightening in this one over previous ones with one noteable exception. In contrasting the fundamental christian's Biblical end times view of the rapture, the rise of the antichrist and the 7 year tribulation period, they had an abundance of "scholars" presenting their case for Daniel and Revelation as historical metaphors and not literal future events. The interesting thing was nearly every so called scholar had a PHD. I guess you CAN be overeducated and wrong.
Why Biblical rape law is just and good
A lot of you have mentioned the Biblical rape law as a reason not to believe Christianity, or a reason not to take the Bible seriously. Here is my rationale for why the Biblical rape law makes sense.
Deuteronomy 22:25: "But if out in the country a man happens to meet a girl pledged to be married and rapes her, only the man who has done this shall die."
Deuteronomy 22:28: "If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, he must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives."
We need to start with the proposition that modern rape laws in the United States are broken. Most rapes and sexual assaults are unreported. Only 10-20% of defendants are convicted. The average sentence for those convicted is 3-5 years. Review of DNA evidence shows that ONE THIRD of men convicted of rape are wrongfully accused. The reasons for false accusations should be fairly obvious. Moreover, the nature of the crime means that witnesses and evidence make it naturally hard, if not impossible, for fact-finders to make accurate determinations in all but rare or violent instances of rape. One also needs to start with the proposition that the death penalty is the appropriate punishment for rape. I have absolutely no problem with the death penalty for forcible rape. This one squares with my reason and sense of justice. Rape ruins a person's life, so the rapist's live should be ruined in return. One must also recognize that the law DOES NOT REQUIRE THE PARTIES TO COHABITATE. The woman would be free to live where ever she wants, mostly likely with her father. The law would then have the effect of making the rapist a virtual eunuch, ON PENALTY OF DEATH. Since he would be legally married, if he ever had sex with another woman for the rest of his life, he would be executed for adultery. It gets worse for the alleged rapist of the single woman. If that single woman decided not to cohabitate with him, that would be sending a VERY clear signal to the community that she was the injured party. So her father, her brothers, and other interested men in the community, such as myself, would forthwith go and beat the snot out of the rapist, and they would enjoy the exercise. If the rapist managed to survive or elude them, he would be forced to flee to one of the cities of refuge set up in the Law and be exiled for the rest of his life. If he owned real and personal property, I'm sure the city authorities would find a way for the victim’s family to buy the property at reduced or no price. Beating, exile, and forfeiture would be significant punishments.
I believe this mandatory marriage law would be a VERY significant deterrence. In fact, it would be so significant that if implemented in the United States, a single instance of rape would be so rare and so shocking that it would make national news. So would the law make sense, even though a few single women annually would be on the wrong end of the stick? Yes, absolutely. Preventing 10-20 women in the United States annually from getting married in a nation of 300,000,000 is unquestionably better than having 1/4 women be sexually assaulted at some point in their life, as is the case now.
Of the 31102 verses in the Bible, I'm down to only two verses that I have trouble with. The Biblical rape law troubled me for 15 years, but it troubles me no longer.
"Big Bang" and its subset "Evolution" has the exact same problem. With a belief in God, we at least have an answer for where the stuff came from - God created it. You may not like the answer, but it's a lot better than yours...
Where did your stuff come from? That little ol' pineapple 14.7 billion years ago - where did it come from? What about the puddle of snot that got struck by lightning and formed life? "It's always been there." Nice try, but that doesn't answer the question.
Faith2Action, a fringe splinter group from the Ohio Right to Life, wants to restrict abortion to any fetus with a detectable heartbeat. The fringe group wants the law so badly that they’re willing to keep fighting through Christmas to convince the Republican legislature to override Gov. John Kasich’s veto. They’re two votes short, the Toledo Blade reported.
Kasich is one of the most anti-choice governors in the country, Jezebel concluded. On the same day that he vetoed the bill he signed a bill that banned all abortions after 20-weeks.
“Don’t give up we have never been closer to ending abortion than we are right now!” wrote Janet Folger Porter, president of Faith2Action in an email to supporters.
Spokesman for NARAL ProChoice Ohio, Gabriel Mann, explained that Porter has been fighting for these laws for years and badgering officials. While many Republicans may have voted for the bill initially some of them may have done so if they knew that Kasich would veto. If they supported it then they may not support a veto override.
A total of 56 members voted to pass the bill and House Speaker Cliff Rosenberger said that two members would have voted for it but they were absent. It takes 60 votes to override the veto.
How can atheist be standing up for the rights of anyone with a belief in a God when they do things such as they did in Washington State by placing a sign that read "At this season of the winter solstice, may reason prevail. There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but a myth and superstition that hardens and enslaves minds." Despite the fact this was public property why did they have to place that sign next to a nativity scene, and at this time of year? Would they have placed a sign like that in front of a mosque during Ramadan? Would they have placed that sign at a synagogue next to a Menorah? I would certainly hope not.
If you think that atheists are not singling out Christians, you had better read what they have to say about themselves; do they mention any other group other than Christans? The answer is no.
I wish others would speak up against removing God from whatever the atheists wish God to be removed from.
Francis Cabot Lowell was the "Father" of the U.S. textile industry. A graduate of Harvard College, Lowell, Massachusetts, is named after him.
Francis Cabot Lowell was descended from the Pilgrim Fathers who reestablished Israel in 1620. Abraham Lincoln was just one of the "Chosen People" who are descended from the illustrious pioneers of Israel in the Wilderness.
Francis Cabot Lowell was the "Father" of the U.S. textile industry which launched the U.S. Industrial Revolution.
He was the Nikola Tesla of the textile industry.
Unfortunately, no image exists of the pioneer of U.S. industry because he was poisoned by the British Secret Service at the young age of 42.
His beloved wife Hannah also succumbed to the poison cup, leaving her husband with 4 young children.
One of the resident British Secret Service agents in Boston at that time was named Kirk Boott. Boott became very close "friends" with the Lowells.
Paul Moody was a brilliant mechanic who designed the first all under one roof power loom factory in the world.
Cotton went in on one side and finished fabric emerged on the other side. It was a quantum leap over any factory in Britain.
Even though he was a devout Christian, he didn't know that the name JOSHUA of Nazareth was the antidote to every kind of poison.
Here is a report of the death of Paul Moody from a very rare biography of Francis Cabot Lowell:
In Lowell he developed the system of leather belts and pulleys to power the machines throughout the factory, replacing the shaft and gear system imported from Britain. His mechanical wizardry is credited for the efficiency and profitability of the Waltham and Lowell factories. He married Susannah Morill of Amesbury, who bore him five children. There is a Moody Street in Waltham and one in Lowell. Paul Moody stayed close to his roots. He believed in public education for boys and girls and was charitable to those less fortunate than himself. On the morning of July 5, 1831, he felt ill. By afternoon he was desperately sick and was dead the following day. He was fifty-four years old and was buried in the family tomb in Byfield. (Rosenberg, The Life and Times of Francis Cabot Lowell, 17751817, p. 311).
Indeed the poison cup was overflowing at the birth of the U.S. Industrial Revolution.
The Lowell factory was a "city set on a hill"
The Lowell factorybuilt by the Chosen Peoplewas indeed a city set on a hill (Matthew 5:14). When the mill opened, girls from the surrounding farms flocked to work there. The New England girls made most of the clothes for their growing families and they were very adept at working the homespun loom.
The Lowell mill was built to show the rest of the world how a factory should be operated.
Unlike the Dickensian sweatshops in Britain, no children were forced to work there.
Most of the girls worked there for about 5 years, and then married, so that they could increase the population of the Chosen People.
The Lowell mill girls were so productive that after 5 years they could pay off any debts on their parents' farms and and also support them in old age.
After their period of employment ended, most of them chose the career that the Almighty ordained for them, namely having children and taking care of the household.
The "workers paradise" did not last long because tares soon joined the wheat.
Sarah George Bagley was a British Secret Service agent sent to stop production at the mill.
Sarah the spy led the first strike in 1836.
Today, the country's first textile factory, which revolutionized U.S. industry, is now a MUSEUM.
By 1850, the New England mill girls began to be replaced by Papal Irish fleeing the famine in that country. That was the real reason why the ancestors of the Kennedys came to this country. There was also an influx of Papal French Canadians from Quebec. It was all downhill from that time onward for the garment industry.
The mill closed in 1930, and was turned into a MUSEUM in 1978. At that time the building was occupied by the Salvation Army which is a cover for the British Secret Service.
The Pemberton Mill disaster was a precursor to 9/11
From the very beginning, Britannia declared an all out war on all the New England textile mills.
The Pemberton Mill was a large factory in Lawrence, Massachusetts, which collapsed without warning on January 10, 1860, in what is likely "the worst industrial accident in Massachusetts history" and "one of the worst industrial calamities in American history." An estimated 145 workers were killed and 166 injured.
The Pemberton Mill, built in 1853, was a five story building 280 feet long and 84 feet wide. Its chief engineer was Charles H. Bigelow, and its construction was financed by John A. Lowell, and his brother-in-law, J. Pickering Putnam, at a cost of $850,000, "a fortune for those times." John A. Lowell was a nephew of Francis Cabot Lowell.
During a financial panic in 1857, Lowell and Putnam sold the mill to George Howe and David Nevins, Sr. for a $350,000 loss. The new owners jammed more machinery into their factory attempting to boost its profits. The mill ran with great success, earning $1,500,000 per year, and had 2,700 spindles and 700 looms in operation at the time of the disaster.
On January 10, 1860, the 5 story Pemberton textile mill collapsed like the Twin Towers.
One of the 2 owners, David C. Nevins, was a British Secret Service agent.
600 people were employed at the mill, with 145 killed and 166 injured.
An account of that tragedy, written right after the event, just stated that the mill was DESTROYED but didn't state who did it:
The DESTRUCTION of the Pemberton Mills at Lawrence, with its attendant appalling loss of life, and injury to the living, is an event calamitous beyond precedent in the list of American casualties, and has stirred the public heart to its swiftest pulsations of sympathy and grief. The memorable scenes of that terrible night at Lawrence, can never be effaced from the minds of those who witnessed them, while the thrilling records of the events given to the world have met and bedewed the eyes of millions. (An Authentic History of the Lawrence Tragedy, Embracing a Description of the Pemberton Mill, p. 5).
The building was solidly constructed and that probably saved the lives of the rest of the employees. The sudden collapse of the building, with the loss of all the state of the art textile machinery, was a horrible act of industrial sabotage.
God did not make man gay, nor did he make him a rapist, a child molester, a thief, a murderer, a heroin addict, a liar
Man makes choices.
No man woke up one day and decided to go shoot heroine. He instead started down a path, of doing wrong. He dropped out of school, he experimented with marijuana, he got addicted to pills . then one day he was a full blown heroine addict.
Homosexuality is a series of choices, and a continuation of going down the wrong road.
Currently in America, the fastest growing group of homosexuals is among African American men. Got tell a brother that he is genetically more likely to become gay, and see if he does not knock the snot out of you.
Black males are getting affected because the most common introduction to homosexuality is behind bars in both jail and prison. Seven of ten black babies are being born into families with no father. Welfare has broken down the family system and when the family and morality break down, homosexuality follows.
HIV is not so much of a punishment for being gay, as much as homosexuality is a punishment for being ungodly. When nations turn away from God, and morality, homosexuality then flourishes.
Utopia, we are just one world government away from it. The leftist agenda to turn us all into the fucken Borg. You will be assimilated.
So the Christian writer who decides to put a good witch like Glinda or Hermione or Samantha Stevens or Willow Rosenberg in his story runs the risk that some impressionable schoolgirl out in the crumbling wilderness of the modern world will decide that the path to self-respect and self-actualization is to don a pointy hat and take up her wand, go to an abortion mill, and sacrifice a baby girl to Moloch. One never knows, O Christian writer, whether the last story that schoolgirl read before she read yours was THE GOLDEN COMPASS or INTERVIEW WITH A VAMPIRE or BLINDSIGHT, or some other work firmly in the camp and flying the black banners of the Culture of Death.
First and foremost, the “Gypsy Curse,” as it is commonly referred to, should not be confused with the typical religious hex, especially in reference to Judeo-Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, Wicca, and Voodoo. A religious hexing, often called a curse’ or hex’, involves the binding of a damned spirit given free reign over one specific sphere of influence on a living host.
A Gypsy Curse differs significantly in that it does not involve spiritual encumbrance on the recipient. Rather, a gypsy curse (which, it is worth noting, is not limited only to “gypsies”) is a transference of negative psychokinetic energy from the caster. It is a common skill associated with anyone possessing paranormal psychic abilities, including telekinesis, psychometry, or telepathy.
Psychokinetic Transference is a method by which the psychically endowed can focus a pattern negative energy from their mind to that of a recipient. In many cases, it realigns the recipient’s thought and perception to filter any thoughts that contradict the transmitted pattern. A key example is the recorded 1823 curse of one Cpl. Owen P. Samuels, wherein he refused to give water to a thirsting Romani. He was then cursed’ to remain in thirst forever. Samuels eventually died of dehydration. Interviews with his peers indicated that, in his final weeks, Samuels would refuse any drink with meals, and would become agitated if served any sort of beverage. The gypsy curse forced him to reject a basic biological need for water, resulting in death.
Relation to Gypsies
Because these abilities are bound to specific genetic markers, they may follow a certain lineage. Because the early Romani tribes were frequently isolated from other ethnic groups, a certain amount of inbreeding served to amplify and replicate their psychic genetics, and the skill of psychokinetic transference was passed from generation to generation. While they possess other abilities, the sad reality is that most Romani gypsies have not learned to harness any of them due to a lack of awareness. The use of a gypsy curse to reverse’ a person’s fortune is an entirely cultural construct, as psychokinetic transferences can realign a recipient to any sort of suggestion.
The gypsy curse is, in and of itself, not responsible for any direct contact with the spirit world. However, because it requires a significant amount of paranormal psychokinetic energy to cast, it will attract the attention of any spirits with an affiliation with the recipient. This may manifest as something as benign as dreams’ from past loved ones, or may invite the attentions of malicious poltergeists who merely happened to be in the vicinity. As a result, many gypsy curses will appear to be accompanied by paranormal phenomenon. It is important to note this this is incidental and not a direct symptom of psychokinetic transference.
Psychokinetic realignments are challenging to reverse. They can not be reversed by the recipient, as their own mind will prevent them from thinking or behaving in any way that counteracts the “curse.” The easiest way to reverse the effects is to reconcile with the person responsible for casting it, though this is extremely rare. The Romani culture does not pass instruction on removing a curse, so it is unlikely the transmitting party will even know that the curse can be reversed, let alone how to go about it. Many psychics will be able to remove the curse, provided they know the specific pattern that was imprinted in the recipient’s mind. As a result, only parts of a curse can be reversed while some portions will linger indefinitely. In some cases, a trained psychic has been able to create a pattern that can either circumvent or contradict a curse’ well enough to make the victim either comfortable with their situation, or simply unaware of it. However, many who have been treated in this manner have eventually succumbed to madness, likely induced from involuntary cognitive dissonance regarding basic biological functions. In some rare cases, victims who have suffered from severe head trauma, stroke, and aneurysm have exhibited reduced or altogether elimination of the effects of their “curse.” However, these incidents may themselves be the end result of said curse unfortunately the subjects had no recollection of what their curse was.
Are we shocked or appalled that straight couples happily exchanged marriage vows alongside homosexuals and lesbians on national television? Haven’t we seen the signs all along? For decades, homosexual advancement has encroached upon Christians and conservatives. Everything from rainbows to school curriculum to parades have been hijacked by progressives, tossed to politicians and handed down to liberal activists working alongside comrades in the entertainment industry. Macklemore was not ONE voice with a few stage props who sang for ONE night. He adequately represents a culmination of years of erosion of Christian and conservative values through liberal ideology and implementation.
So what should Christians and conservatives do? Complain to CBS? Sign petitions? Blog about how awful this behavior is for society? Those are sound starting places.
I propose this: Be yourself and don’t be so defensive. I’m myself no matter the situation or people. Sometimes I deliberately go through the checkout line of the lesbian clerk to drop a few words of Jesus’ love in her ear and then compliment her haircut. Or I encourage the star-struck 17-year-old to become informed on political issues that will affect her life, then discuss those big hoop earrings she’s sporting. No defense, no arguments, no worries. I remain offensive. I’m me.
Remind yourself that conservative values are still a major element in society, and Christianity is the only answer for cultural depravity. The Grammy folks want us to believe otherwise. They took a blatant shot at us through deplorable lyrics and godless imagery and tried to frame the narrative to say that homosexuality is widely accepted as the norm. They’re wrong. Society at large does not accept that narrative. They hope we’ll throw our hands up and surrender. Don’t do it. Order my book for a “how to” approach to dealing with godless liberalism within society.
Here's how evowackos "debate".
They use "science", "scientist" and/or "scientific" ar least five times in every grammatically incompetent sentence;
They claim to be scientists/professors of science in prestigious institutions such as MIT, but their abysmal ignorance of science exposes them as teen trolls within a few posts;
They are without exception pompous, arrogant, ignorant, contentious, insulting, brazen, shameless, and clueless;
They are with few exceptions the first in an ev thread to raise the issue of faith and religion;
They attack my Christianity and the Bible even though I have NEVER cited either in my incisive demolitions of their junk science;
They accuse creationinists/ID advocates of being religious, but they worship Darwin and cite/quote TalkOrigins as their godless bible;
They utterly refuse to address any scientifically sound rebuttal of their mythology;
They universally insist that natural selection renders math and probabilities irrelevant and makes the impossible inevitable;
They invariably cite consensus as their proof of evolutionism;
They load their Plan-9-level bullshit with subjunctive-mode words/phrases such as "might have", "may have", "could have", "it is assumed", "it is thought", "it is supposed", "let us imagine", etcetera, and they have the balls to call that science;
And on and on and on ad nauseam.
It would be refreshing to encounter one of the zit-popping little snot-eaters who actually attempted to debate rather than reciting their tedious mantras that we've all heard/read at least a hundred times.
[On a negative review of the film "God's Not Dead"]
Another angry Atheist spitting and crying with a snot nosed reply because him and his ignorant friends have been exposed for being the ass holes everyone is sick of. This review is undeserving of even one star. It focuses on his own faithlessness and anger because he’s jealous of the real God and wants to cry about Christians actually fighting the RELIGION of atheism. Constantly forcing their faith of a godless universe with a failed hypothesis of the religion of evolution he picks on a movie that exposes such stupidity. I am sorry I wasted my time listening to this idiot spit out his ignorance out of personal distaste rather than give a fair review. Just another idiot trying to pretend to have a brain. I can just hear the scarecrow now “If only I had a brain”. Do us all a favor and give up on reviews as your opinion is about as worthy as a pile of dog refuse.
Here's how evowackos "debate".
They use "science", "scientist" and/or "scientific" ar least five times in every grammatically incompetent sentence;
They claim to be scientists/professors of science in prestigious institutions such as MIT, but their abysmal ignorance of science exposes them as teen trolls within a few posts;
They are without exception pompous, arrogant, ignorant, contentious, insulting, brazen, shameless, and clueless;
They are with few exceptions the first in an ev thread to raise the issue of faith and religion;
They attack my Christianity and the Bible even though I have NEVER cited either in my incisive demolitions of their junk science;
They accuse creationinists/ID advocates of being religious, but they worship Darwin and cite/quote TalkOrigins as their godless bible;
They utterly refuse to address any scientifically sound rebuttal of their mythology;
They universally insist that natural selection renders math and probabilities irrelevant and makes the impossible inevitable;
They invariably cite consensus as their proof of evolutionism;
They load their Plan-9-level bullshit with subjunctive-mode words/phrases such as "might have", "may have", "could have", "it is assumed", "it is thought", "it is supposed", "let us imagine", etcetera, and they have the balls to call that science;
And on and on and on ad nauseam.
It would be refreshing to encounter one of the zit-popping little snot-eaters who actually attempted to debate rather than reciting their tedious mantras that we've all heard/read at least a hundred times.
[ On the Ice Bucket Challenge to raise money for ALS ]
The video’s depiction of Oprah Winfrey taking the challenge is particularly disturbing, Owens said. “Winfrey precedes her dousing with the words In the name of ALS and the Ice Bucket Challenge’ because Oprah mistakenly believes the One True God is jealous of her, and the well-known fact that she denounces Jesus as the only way to God and basically considers herself to be a god, I found this statement to be very cultic in nature.”
Is Putin a Jew, on his mother's side?
And also a Freemason?
I believe these are important questions.
Are we being played yet again?
WHY IN YOUR OWN LIFE YOU SHOULD BE VERY OFFENSIVE
Notices the lies told to this generation and writes about them.
The proper response to political correctness could be to go on living life as you see fit. Another option is to cave in, as many in this era do. “Go along to get along,” may simply appear as a necessary expedient when you are told to “pick your battles.”
That may seem innocuous, but the vile act of giving in to what is wrong is at the very heart of the figurative, accurate, and effective pejorative “cuckservative.” If you are a man, you don’t let your vital boundaries get crossed because when you do, you show the world that nothing is sacred to you. In the smallest of behaviors you show the world that when it comes down to it, even your wife is not sacred to you.
In this era, where free speech is aggressively under attack, the superior response to society attempting to silence others is to draw a line that is far beyond legitimate speech that affects you. There are plenty of opportunities in life where you draw a boundary so far from anywhere that matters.
The Mailman Doesn’t Enter the House, Ever
Your mailman or UPS guy drops off packages at the door. Not inside the door. It’s just an extra two feet, it’s not like he’s sitting down at your dinner table or climbing into bed, so what’s the difference? You set that wide boundary at the threshold of your home, no matter how heavy a package is.
You don’t want this guy in your private space because before you know it, this stranger may easily push the boundary a little farther and a little farther. One way to make sure that the mailman is never in bed with your wife is to make sure the mailman is never in the house. The door is the boundary of the home. The home is private. The government worker and the stranger alike are not invited into the home.
A Smart Man Doesn’t Depend On The Next Paycheck, Ever
You don’t need many years worth of savings and investments to live comfortably. As long as you have marketable skills, you could exist fine with very little saved. But it sure feels good to have a giant buffer protecting you from direly being in need of that next paycheck. One way to make sure you never live paycheck to paycheck is to make sure that you are many paychecks away from that horribly low bar.
The Free Speech Buffer
Free speech should be another boundary where we draw a large buffer.
[Blackface-like drawing of Serena Williams stomping angrily on her tennis racket while a referee asks the other player to let her win.]
[Caption: SERENA WILLIAMS CARICATURES MUST BE PROTECTED]
Because we didn’t successfully protect the rights of the deplorable to draw Muhammad caricatures, we are now fighting over whether any caricature artist will ever again be allowed to caricature any black woman.
How long before all cartoons of anyone on the left becomes forbidden? Before cartoons of any beloved figure adored by many becomes forbidden? Push back. Not only is Serena Williams allowed to be caricatured, so is Muhammad. In fact, the world is better off if artists caricature the two bullies being badly behaved together.
CHALLENGING THE OFFICIAL, THOUGHTLESS NARRATIVE ON THE HOLOCAUST MUST BE PROTECTED
If you don’t fight for that academic freedom, then you end up with a campus environment where even the well-evidenced and relatively tame Charles Murray can’t take a stage in a college. When you stand up for the most out in right field intellectual rigor, you stand up for the concept of intellectual rigor.
It brings greater truth, reason, and honesty. Those all make for a better world. Inviting intellectually rigorous debate makes the world a better place. Yes, that also means inviting intellectually rigorous debate on the Holocaust makes the world a better place.
“Deplatforming” and “Hate Crime” Push The Overton Window
Deplatforming is a legitimate behavior on the left. It’s currently being celebrated throughout the left as a victory against extremism.
The term “hate speech” is a legitimate distinction on the left. It’s merely an attempt to silence. To overpower a person with an opinion. There is no hate speech. There is only speech.
These are never legitimate distinctions between how you can interact with what adults. There is no hate speech, there are no hate crimes, there are no protected classes of adults. That must be the perspective. True to first principles: a human is a human.
Everyone who comes to an intellectual debate must be ready to take off the gloves and to get deep into the truth of the matter being discussed. In a debate, no one is free to be protected from the truths that arise in an intellectual debate no matter how offended they feel, not even if they cry or throw a tantrum. Laugh at them if they do, for they should be very embarrassed.
Marxist Wars On Freedom Are The True Hate Crime
The true hate crime is the promotion of neo-Marxism by social justice warriors. They seek to win debates by pulling apart the freedoms that the freedom fighters of the West, our intellectual forebearers have struggled for centuries to introduce to humanity.
Marxism turns good cultures into legalistic petty cultures that tend to behave culturewide in adulthood as if they’ve gone through an abusive upbringing. Marxism turns relative paradises on this planet into places of abject squalor. These are hate crimes.
Interestingly, the neo-Marxist social justice warriors overlook this fact and prefer to point to your hurtful words as the real hate crime. Don’t let them. They are the domestic terrorists who would repeat the failed Marxist experiment on this wonderful land.
Be A Free Speech Warrior
I request of you that as you go through life, you take the temperature of the place you are in and always seek to push the boundaries. To do so is alpha and feels good. Sometimes you fail, more often you succeed.
Just like pushing boundaries with a woman and weathering shit tests earns you rewards, pushing the free speech boundaries and passing the shit tests of those who would silence you will earn you rewards.
MAKE THE QUIP THAT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED OVER THE LINE.
Cross the line. Do it fearlessly. Do it boldly.
USE THE WORDS THAT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED OVER THE LINE.
You know what they are. Use them. All the words that you are told you can’t use. Use them. Use them with skill, for maximum effect. But use them. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.
SHARE THE OPINION THAT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED OVER THE LINE.
The best researched most effective thing you know how to present, present it. Present it in a way that no one can dispute it. If you’re not great at anything, present what you’re best at. Do it enough and you’ll get good at it.
They are born with a propensity to be homosexual, just like people are with the propensity to be a liar, alcoholic, aggressive, etc, but I don't see people justifying people like that...
One day I found this sentence in a biography of Burne-Jones, and I jotted it down in my diary and pondered it for a day or two, “I mean by a picture a beautiful romantic dream of something that never was, never will be in a better light than any light that ever shone in a land no one can define or remember, only desire and from forms divinely beautiful.”
When I read that sentence, I almost fainted. I was a sensitive girl, given to fits of swooning at the slightest opportunity. It was then I realized there was no real difference between poetry and painting, between painting and music. All, in their own ways, sought for God albeit a God who might not exist but a God nonetheless. God was beauty. God was longing. God was the fire in the rose.
That’s what I thought then. I was young and foolish.
Art, I found out later, was about making money. Organized Jewry taught me this. Art dealer Paul Rosenberg says, “A painting is only beautiful when it sells.” Jewish president of the Marlborough Gallery, Frank Lloyd, confirms this: “There is only one measure of success in running a gallery: making money.”
Since Darwin and Freud, there has been a complete “revaluation of all values.” Everything has been turned upside down. We can mostly attribute this parlous state of affairs to the machinations of organized Jewry, in particular to a group of revolutionary thinkers known as the Frankfurt School.
One of the founders of the Frankfurt School, Georg Lukács, asked rhetorically, “Who will save us from Western civilization?” He began the rescue operation himself, convincing himself that the best way to do this was to create “a culture of pessimism” and “a world that has been abandoned by God.” Cool.
It will soon become clear to you, if you are a struggling artist, that the art world is dominated by Jews who are only too anxious to bring about this hell on earth. Their control over what now passes for art is as tentacular as it is terrifying. Art has morphed into Anti-Art. “For Jews,” Israel Shamir points out, “their group interest lies in undermining visual art, for they can’t compete with it. Even deeper group interest is to undermine Christianity, their main enemy.”
You will meet many artists, quite a few of them pliant and accommodating non-Jews, who are prepared to jump through the hoops set before them by their Masters: the ubiquitous Jews lurking in the shadows. The men who call the shots. The men with the money. The men whom the artist must learn to please and flatter if he hopes to get ahead and become rich and famous.
The ambitious artist will find himself drawn inevitably into a Jewish world. He will learn to pepper his conversation with Yiddish phrases. He will never breathe a word of criticism against Israel, no matter what atrocities that country is in the process of committing. He will sneer at Muslims, the Qur’an and the Palestinians. He will find it pays dividends to insult Christianity, the religion of his forefathers. He will mention the Holocaust, whenever possible, with moist eyes; and he will paint as many pictures of Auschwitz as he can, preferably with chimneys belching black smoke.
Andy Warhol knew better than most how to ingratiate himself with the Jews. His 1980 series, “Ten Portraits of Jews of the Twentieth Century,” features ten portraits of what Warhol referred to as “Jewish geniuses,” one of whom was Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir the “genius” who said there were no Palestinians, adding with her famous flair for the witty phrase: “How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return them to.” Another “genius” was Sigmund Freud, whom Kevin MacDonald has described as having perpetrated the greatest scientific fraud of the 20th century a fraud that was very useful in constructing the culture of Western suicide.
Transvestite potter Grayson Perry here he is receiving the Turner Prize for his inspired pots knew his success depended less on his talents than on the advertising genius of his plutocratic patron Charles Saatchi. He was well aware, moreover, that Islamophobia can always be relied on to win friends and influence people in the Judeocentric art world. “The reason I haven’t gone all out to attack Islamism in my art,” he confides fearlessly, “is because I feel real fear that someone will slit my throat.” Avoiding controversial political statements in the interests of discretion, Perry decided to devote his life to producing ceramic pots depicting “explicit scenes of sexual perversion.” It must have been a tough decision.
As for Andres Serrano with his Piss Christ and Chris Ofili with his dung-bedecked Holy Virgin Mary the Madonna surrounded by pictures of the female genitals cut from pornographic magazines both these emotionally immature artists were clearly aware that contempt for Christ and his mother is often pleasing to the Jews.
Artists? These men are more like circus dogs, trained to jump through hoops and beg for bones from their masters. It’s the men with the money, the Saatchis and the Guggenheims, who crack the whip.
Gays and lesbians prey on children. If you behaved ethically, you would not be hated. Teaching people to accept those who prey on children is a bad thing. This is about the normalization of pedophilia, so stop playing innocent. We're onto you.
"Gays and lesbians have no sexual interest in children, it's pedophiles you are thinking of. Stop making them out to be the same thing, for one thing it's dishonest, and for another you reveal yourself to be nothing resembling a Christian by saying it."
You are a liar, as usual.
Gay couples who preyed on their own adopted children. You people have no morals at all.
Run these names on Google. You won't because you don't want to acknowledge the truth.
Frank Lombard Duke adopted son sex
George Harasz Douglas Wirth adopted sons
Peter Truong Mark Newton adopted son
Ian Wathey Craig Faunch abuse children
Carl Herold Charles Dunnavant son sex
Cesar Gonzales-Mugaburu foster boys
David Cannon John Scarfe son sex
Christian Jessica Deanda Eraca Dawn Craig torture
Rachel Stevens Kayla Jones son abuse
Pauline Moreno Debra Lobel son
Aric Babbitt Matthew Deyo
Robert Owen Justin Jarvis Indiana 2017
"Even if that list was true (and I'm not saying it is - most of it is highly suspect), congratulations on identifying twelve people who are homosexual pedophiles. How about being honest now and giving us a list of the disproportionately huge list of heterosexual pedophiles?"
You said gays are NOT pedophiles. I'm giving you the names of gays who ARE pedophiles.
You scared to Google those names - chicken?
You people are pathological liars.
Gays DO prey on boys. You are a liar.
The Jewish Hollywood moguls long ago decided that it would help them make more money if the general public viewed films as being "Christian." In fact, they personally wanted to blend in with the Gentile community. Thus Samuel Goldfish changed his name to Goldwyn and Cecil B. de Mille insisted that he was a Gentile until his death when a Rabbi officiated at his funeral. Every single one of the original Jewish developers of the movie industry divorced their Jewish wives and married beautiful Christian starlets.
This includes Louis B. Mayer, Samuel Goldwyn, Jack Warner, David O. Selznick and Harry Cohen. They gave orders to the numerous Jews they made "stars" to change their Jewish names to Christian sounding ones. This has also included a lot of "nosejobs" for both Jewish male and female stars. Here are but a few who followed this road to stardom.
Here are a list of many Hollywood actors and their real Jewish names . . .
Joey Adams ................................ Joseph Abramowitz
Eddie Albert ................................. Eddie Heimberger
Woody Allen................................. Allen Konigsberg
Lauren Bacall .............................. Joan Perske
Jack Benny .................................. Benny Kubelsky
Milton Berle .................................. Milton Berlinger
Ernest Borgnine ........................... Effron Borgnine
George Burns .............................. Nathan Birnbaum
Joan Blondell................................ Rosebud Blustein
Joyce Brothers ............................ Joyce Bauer
Mel Brooks .................................. Melvin Kaminsky
Joey Bishop ................................ Joey Gottlieb
Charles Bronson ......................... Charles Buchinsky
Rona Barrett ................................ Rona Burnstein
Cyd Chrisse ................................. Tula Finklea
Tony Curtis .................................. Bernie Schwartz (daughter is Jamie Lee Curtis)
Joan Crawford ............................. Lucille Le Sueur
Dyan Cannon ............................... Samile Friesen
Kirk Douglas ................................ Isadore Demsky (son is Michael Douglas)
Bob Dylan .................................... Robert Zimmerman
Rodney Dangerfield .................... Jacob Cohen
Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. ................. Douglas Ullman
Joel Grey ..................................... Joel Katz (father of Jennifer Grey)
Elliott Gould ................................. Elliott Goldstein
Zsa Zsa Gabor ............................ Sara Gabor
John Garfield .............................. Jules Garfinkle
Judy Garland ............................... Frances Gumm
Paulette Goddard ........................ Paulette Levy
Eydie Gorme................................. Edith Gormezano
Cary Grant ................................... Larry Leach
Lorne Green ................................ Chaim Leibowiz
Judy Holliday ............................... Judith Tuvin
Leslie Howard .............................. Leslie Stainer
Buddy Hackett ............................. Leonard Hacker
Jill St. John ................................. Jill Oppenheim
Danny Kaye................................. David Kominsky
Alan King ..................................... Irwin Kniberg
Larry King.................................... Larry Zeiger
Tina Louise.................................. Tina Blacker
Ann Landers................................. Esther Friedman (Abigail Van Buren is her sister.)
Dorothy Lamour .......................... Dorothy Kaumeyer
Miehael Landon .......................... Mike Orowitz
Steve Lawrence .......................... Sidney Leibowitz
Hal Linden.................................... Hal Lipsh**z
Jerry Lewis ................................. Joseph Levitch
Karl Maiden ................................. Maiden Sekulovitch
Paul Muni .................................... Muni Weisenfreund
Ethel Merman ............................. Ethel Zimmerman
Jan Murray ................................. Murray Janofsky
Walter Matthau ........................... Walter Matasschanskayasky
Lilly Palmer ................................. Maria Peiser
Jan Pierce................................... Pincus Perelmuth
Roberta Peters.............................Roberta Peterman
Eleanor Parker............................. Ellen Friedlob
Joan Rlvers ............................... Joan Molinsky
Tony Randall ............................. Sidney Rosenberg
Edward G. Robinson .................. Emanuel Goldenberg
Dinah Shore ............................... Francis Rose Shore
Shelly Winters ............................ Shirley Schrift
Winona Ryder..................... Laura Horowitz
Gene Wilder............................... Jerome Silberman
If your Jewish, be proud of it. Why change your name to hide your real identity? The answer is obvious. Because if the public knew THE TRUTH that Hollywood and the television networks are Jewish owned and controlled, many people would think twice and stop watching. Nobody likes to be manipulated, whether physically, emotionally, mentally or spiritually. Anything based upon a lie is not something that Christians ought want to be a part of. I don't like Hollywood's deception, anymore than I do their immoral filth that has corrupted America's homes for the Devil.
Research and you will find, that Judaism rejects Jesus as the Messiah 100%, and those unbelieving Jews are behind the most vile smut, filth and sexual immorality imaginable in society today. They revel in it, and the profits! Wherever Jesus Christ is not found, neither is morality and righteousness. If I were a part of the shameful culture of Hollywood, which glorifies wickedness and blasphemes the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, I guess I'd change my name too in embarrassment.
appalachian and ozarkian folk music contains hidden messages that are the key to unlocking eastern america's esoteric and theurgic potential
i have done crypto-zoology and alternative timeline archeology deep in the appalachian mountains. atlantean ley lines, deathworms - all real
in ozark highlands i've seen huge cedar trees ripped from the earth. american "yetis" dwell there, telepathic with feudal society, in caves.
A rough translation of the quiz, kindly sent in by the person who also showed [Shmarya Rosenberg] the image of the quiz. ([Shmarya Rosenberg] edited the translation slightly to make the grammar consistent):
1. Why does a Heavenly voice announce that this girl will belong to that man?
Correct answer: Because God decides who is the correct person for each person to marry.
2. Then why don't we know who our right marriage partner is? [I.e., why don’t we hear that Heavenly voice ourselves or have some other way to know for sure who are correct God-chosen spouse is?]
Correct answer: Because God does great miracles that we don't know the details of.
3. Why was each person created in this world?
Correct answer: To recite blessings, to pray to God, to study Torah, and to serve.
4. Explain what the [proper] role of a woman in this world is based on the verse "it is not good for man to be alone, I [God] will create him a helpmate.”
Correct answer: To ensure that her husband doesn't lack anything.
5. Why does man need a “helpmate”?
Correct answer: Because his job is to study Torah and therefore he can't [spend time] doing women’s work.
Give examples of how a woman encourages her husband and makes him happy:
1. She smiles at him
2. She is nice to him
3. She takes care of all his needs
6. Is a man who lives without a wife a complete human being? What is lacking in him? Quote what we cited above.
Correct answer: [The student did not answer this question.]
7. Explain why a woman who prepares food and clothing for her husband is “giving light to his eyes" and "puts him back on his feet.”
Correct answer: Because this is her job.
8. Explain the words of Rabbanit Kanievsky [who said], "with her husband, [a woman should speak and interact] only with sweetness.”
Correct answer: [The student did not answer this question.]
9. What is the example of a bad woman the Babylonian Talmud gives?
Correct answer: A woman who sets the table and decorates it, who prepares food, and then her husband enters the room, and she closes the door. [I’m not familiar with this reference or have forgotten it, but it appears to refer to a woman encouraging or asking for sex. [Shmarya Rosenberg]]
[The image of the test is available in the link to the source of the quote - First-person pronouns have been replaced by the blogmaster's name]
Humanity has always tried to justify evilwhether it be adultery, idolatry, robbery, abortion, lying, greed, drunkenness, war, et cetera. In Proverb 30:20 the Bible speaks about an adulterous women who says, “I HAVE DONE NO WICKEDNESS.” She is a sinner in self-denial. She has done wickedness!
What does the Bible mean by “she wipeth her mouth?” I believe it is a reference to the Garden of Eden when Eve ate the forbidden fruit. The adulterous woman eats the forbidden fruit of adultery, and then wipes her mouth in sinful pride and arrogance, saying, “I HAVE DONE NO WICKEDNESS.”
Americans have likewise eaten the forbidden fruit of every sin imaginablepride, idolatry, feminism, fornication, abortion, murder, homosexuality, same-sex marriage, divorce, drunkenness, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera!!! As a nation we have wiped our mouth and said, “I HAVE DONE NO WICKEDNESS.” Ah, but we have committed wickedness, time and time again with no shame! It is only sinful pride that causes a person to deny their sins.
Tens-of-millions of Americans have embraced the wickedness of SIN CITY Las Vegas. We ought to be ashamed as a nation of Las Vegas, just as if our home had garbage piled in the front yard. Las Vegas is the garbage in our nation's front yard. Hollywood is a backed-up sewer, flooding our nation with stinking sewage. Walt Disney in Orlando, Florida is piled garbage in the back of our nation, sprawled out in the alley, trash infested with rats and maggots! To the same extent that Americans embrace wickedness, to that same extent God is giving us over to a Police State dictatorship. God will not bless a sinful people.
America Has Done Evil in the Sight of the Lord
We read in Judges 6:1 that Israel “did evil in the sight of the Lord.” Consequently, God gave them over in judgment to their enemies, the Midianites...
Judges 6:13, “And Gideon said unto him, Oh my Lord, if the LORD be with us, why then is all this befallen us? and where be all his miracles which our fathers told us of, saying, Did not the LORD bring us up from Egypt? but now the LORD hath forsaken us, and delivered us into the hands of the Midianites.”
Notice that Gideon didn't understand why Israel was being judged and given over to tyranny. This is happening in America today. We have done evil in the sight of the Lord, and God is giving America over to a group of thug gangsters who've taken control of the White House, the Pentagon, et cetera. They operate through the CIA, FEMA, Homeland Security, and other government agencies into which they have appointed their own people. Through affluence, blackmail and fear-mongering they control the newsmedia, congress, and the Supreme Court. They own and operate the privately owned Federal Reserve Banks. It is an extensive system of criminal tyranny, treason and Godless wickedness. They disguise their tyranny with patriotism and an American flag. The mainstream newsmedia in America are anti-God, anti-family, anti-Christianity, anti-national sovereignty; but they are masters of deceit, paid professional liars, and manipulators of public opinion.
Most of America's churches are apostate, supporting wicked criminal leaders instead of exposing them. The largest churches are the most apostate, being pastored by affluent and wealthy men, the rich rubbing shoulders with the rich. They all look the other way and no one seems to care. Rich people support rich people, because they don't want to lose their fame, fortune and good times. They've been bought off. It's time to say no to Hitler!
The United States is so saturated with demonic influences and wickedness that we've legalized the killing of 51,000,000 precious children in the womb since 1973. Statistically, a mother's womb is the most dangerous place in the world to be. How tragic! A mother's womb ought to be the safest place in the world for a child, which are a reward from God. Psalm 127:3, “Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.” God entrusts parents with a human life to “bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4). Children are a reward from God, a privilege to raise a child. Abortion... a choice? Do the children have a choice?
God will not bless a nation that legalizes homosexual marriages and then wipes their mouth, saying “I HAVE DONE NO WICKEDNESS.” In 2011 New York state legalized same-sex marriage. Since they don't require proof of residence, gays nationwide can now become legally married in New York. How romantic! Barf! God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. No one is born homosexual because God doesn't make mistakes. If two men get married, the very fact that they cannot reproduce is nature's evidence that homosexuality is strange, abnormal and unnatural in every way. Homosexuals can wipe their mouths all they want in defense of their sins, but the Bible says that Judgment Day is coming (Romans 1:32; Hebrews 9:27).
This world is a wicked place (1st John 5:19). I read in the news recently about British Prime Minister, Tony Blaire, who's been having Catholic priest parties for transvestite nuns. Blaire recently converted over to the demonic Roman Catholic religion. How about pole-dancing for Jesus in Texas? In this wicked culture, anything goes in Jesus name! The only true, reliable and safe place to form our opinions, receive guidance, and make our decisions is from the teachings of the inspired Word of God, i.e., the precious King James Bible. We are living in a woefully sinful society that wipes its mouth saying, “I HAVE DONE NO WICKEDNESS.” But Americans are in wicked self-denial. Abortion is murder! Homosexuality is a sin! Same-sex marriage is of the Devil. Fornication is a sin! Feminist rebellion is a sin! Divorce is a sin! Pornography is evil! Drunkenness is a sin! Casino gambling is evil! Public nudity is evil! Witchcraft is a sin! Idolatry is a sin! All of the things I am mentioning are LEGAL in the United States.
Every child deserves to have a father and a mother. The entire concept of two lesbians trying to raise a child without a father in the home is INSANITY!!! Are you listening Rosie O'Donnell? Rosie O'Donnell is a disgrace to America, and has attacked Bible-believing Christians, categorizing them with terrorists. How can anyone in their right mind claim that it's the American way to murder children by abortion, allow lesbians to raise children, and utilize fertility clinics to allow homosexuals to have lab babies? Americans have gone insane!
America is becoming a surveillance society with video cameras being installed everywhere, even in public bathrooms. Police departments nationwide are now using license plate scanners, which can scam thousands of plates per hour while driving around. American society is becoming a giant control-grid of abuse, control and power. The criminal cartel running our country are now beginning to take control over the world. There will be no where to run!!! They're sticking their hands down our pants now. . . .
Owen J.J. Stone Exposes the Horror of TSA Reaching into His Pants (Your next!)
TSA Now Putting Hands Down Fliers’ Pants
They hate our guts, even the veterans. Where will all this technology and lust for power end. They've got face-scanning video games now, with voice-recognition, transferring data over the internet everywhere. Google and My Space admit to spying on people through use of the onboard laptop computer cameras. We are living in a drugged out fluoride-head society of drone-zombies! America has become a spiritually rat-infested, maggot-crawling, wormhole, decadent, cesspool of iniquity!!! She=devils are all over the place. Good men are terrified to get married because of the feminist agendas at work in the biased court system. America has gone to hell. The divorce rate is over 75% in California alone.
Our nation's leaders are trashing out the economy, looting the Treasury, stealing our homes, giving away our land and nation, ruining what is left of the United States. The republic has fallen!!!
Even so, come, Lord Jesus!
I told u about this show on E,. These people are lgbtq and now they want to identify as aliens. And we wonder why trump won, time to go back to a mandatory Christian society, this lifestyle and the whole Islam thing is a threat to Christianity in the west,
Men wanting to be woman; women wanting to men.....men marrying men and banning the term ' first lady'.... teens planning suicide bombs....this wa snot happening in the west during the 90s.
This is the kind of society you get when you take Jesus, king of Israel out of society,
Many people think like me, they just won't publicly admit. Expect trump to win in 4 years.
Teacher accused of sex with 8th grader says she's the victim
A former middle school teacher is on trial for sexual activity with a student.
Justine Nelson, 33, is facing two felony counts -- one for sex acts with a boy when he was 13 and one for sex acts when he was 14.
Nelson admits to committing sexual acts on an 8th grader, but she's admitting to no crime.
"You can't find someone guilty if they're mentally or physically coerced to do something," said her defense attorney Roger Nuttall.
He says Nelson finally gave up and sent nude photos and engaged in sexual activity with the boy after repeated threats to expose their close relationship.
"She wasn't the aggressor," Nuttall said. "He was the aggressor."
He highlighted testimony from a psychologist who said the former teacher isn't a sexual predator, so he told the jury the boy was the real predator.
From prosecutor Liz Owen's perspective, Nelson was supposed to be the grownup in the situation.
"Mr. Nuttall wants you to believe the 13- and 14-year-old eighth grader had all the power," she said. "Please. He was scared to death to tell what was happening."
The boy's age is a point of contention, and an important one because it could be the difference between eight years in prison or three.
He testified he was 13 when the sexual activity started and 14 when it happened for the last time.
But Nuttall called the boy a liar who changed his story -- from saying it happened three times, starting when he was 13, to saying it happened dozens of times, mostly when he was 13 -- all to make money in a civil lawsuit.
Owen says the boy has consistently said it happened when he was 13 and when he was 14.
And she says what Nuttall seems to call threats is just a persistent thread of sexual conversations and photos and talk about her giving him money or clothes, but making sure his mother and her husband didn't find out.
"They want you to believe she had to do this, she had to orally copulate him because he was threatening her," she said. "There's no evidence of a threat. He never said if you don't give me these shoes I'm going to reveal this."
Nelson's teacher's credential was suspended after her arrest in 2016 and the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing revoked it in January of this year.
The jury in her felony case started deliberations late Monday afternoon.
Masturbation is specifically identified in the Bible as 'unclean'... My thinking is, it makes sense that a woman who is facing her period is 'unclean', but it is easy to think that semen from masturbation is nothing more than something like 'snot', something that can be wiped away and forgotten. But these army dudes [in Deuteronomy 23:9] weren't even allowed to reenter the camp until they became clean again. Furthermore, this is with regard to nocternal omissions... which are completely involuntarily. Why, then, could someone possibly think that masturbation, which is completely voluntary, is an exception to the rule of uncleanliness? So the next time you voluntarily discharge semen, keep in mind that, according to Old Testament law, the Lord (Yahweh), your Creator, finds it to be as filthy as the discharge of a woman's period. (Eww.)
Are you seeking for how to reverse the Illuminati Satanic baptism ALS Ice bucket challenge ritual? The ALS Ice Bucket sounds like a harmless challenge for a good cause. But it’s not! If you dig a little bit deeper, you find out it’s about a Satanic baptism ritual.
The Background story
ALS or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a terrible decease that slowly deactivate your body functions step-by-step. If we may believe the story on Wikipedia: From mid-2013 to early 2014 somebody emptied a bucket of water filled with ice cubes over his head while being recorded on camera to collect money for a friend who has been diagnosed for ALS.
You have to challenge a person, the challenged person is required to perform the same ritual within 24 hours and repeat the step. The ALS Ice bucket challenge became a world wide hype on social media, even i did it.
First red flag is: They hide the founder on Wikipedia and i Quote: “The origins of the idea of dumping cold water on one’s head to raise money for charity are unclear”. and quote: “ . a challenge of unknown origin”.
People are able to tell how old a dinosaur is by looking at the bones, we know who wrote the bible but’ we are unable to tell who the founder is of ALS?
Let me tell you about someone who they like to skip in this story. His name is Corey Griffin, co-founder of the ALS Ice Bucket challenge. Responsible person who made the challenge a world wide hype.
Second red flag: He died when he left a very successful ALS fundraiser and “dove off a building at Straight Wharf in Nantucket at 2 a.m. on Aug. 16 and drowned, according to the Boston Globe. He floated to the surface [and] then he sank. He did not come up again,’ the report says. Corey was pronounced dead at 3 a.m. He had helped raise $100,000 for ALS research on the night of his death.’” Corey Griffin appeared to be on a path to great achievements: He was a college hockey player, enjoyed a very successful financial career and was a philanthropist who raised money for children in hospitals and his friend stricken with ALS.
It confounds me as to why Griffin would take such a risk with his life, especially in the dead of night? Very odd. Very bizarre. Very dark.
The video’s depiction of Oprah Winfrey taking the challenge is particularly disturbing, Owens said. “In the name of ALS and the Ice Bucket Challenge’ because Oprah believes the One True God is jealous of her, and the well-known fact that she denounces Jesus as the only way to God and basically considers herself to be a god, I found this statement to be very cultic in nature.”
In conclusion: “The ALS IBC is ritualistic in nature. People are chosen to undergo a form of water baptism with cultic god Oprah leading the charge in the name of ALS.’”
She has influence over millions, but what does she really believe? Get Josh McDowell’s expose ” God: A Dialogue on Truth and Oprah’s Spirituality”
The ALS IBC is ritualistic in nature. People are chosen to undergo a form of water baptism with cultic god Oprah leading the charge “in the name of ALS.” The Bible is clear: “You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3). Oprah is a god to millions of Americans, and those who follow her doctrine and antics have tossed Jesus off the throne of their hearts perhaps not intentionally or perhaps so. Yet by following her seemingly innocent IBC decree, knowingly or not, they have cast Jesus off symbolically.
What about the money? The foundation raised over $94 million in one month, stupendously exceeding the $1.5 million it raised last year. And it continues to rake in approximately $9 million per day. There are concerns about ALS using embryonic stem-cell methods, and the organization is not very clear on which research it will conduct and how any of that translates into advances to combat or cure ALS. This has left some people feeling misused or duped into participating with the IBC.
Why they do it?
To Purify the world before the great human sacrifice, also to test us how good we listen and how good we follow as flock of sheep. Well, very good! First the Ice Bucket challenge and than the Fire challenge.
The “Ice Bucket Challenge” is actually a large Ritual Purification Cleansing’ preparing for the Largest Human Sacrifice in History to usher in the Beast System.
What if I told you the latest Fire and Ice Challenges are tied to the Illuminati and New World Order’s bold Agenda of the rise of the Fourth Beast System, the Reign of the Anti-Christ?
What if I told you that depending on how you decided to “cleanse” whether having water dumped on your head or being the dumpee represented turning someone else in or giving yourself up come that time?
What if I told you the Ice Challenge was a hidden Illuminati code inviting ISIS to Ice Us?
What if I told you Obama sitting in the “Iron Throne” back in May in a “photo-shopped” White House tweet was in fact God showing us the hour we are living in according to the book of Daniel and Revelation?
How to reverse the Satanic baptism ALS Ice bucket ritual?
For almost six months i was figuring out how to reverse, undo or un-baptize myself. I was surprised my local church throw the door in front of me and many others did not answered my mail at all. I don’t worry, karma will deal with them!
The answer is: There is no reverse ritual on the Satanic baptism ritual. The only way to clean yourself from this evil bondage is to do this:
Confess your sin and repent to God. “If you confess your sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive you your sins and purify you from all unrighteousness.” 1 John 1:9. Renounce participation in the devils schemes. Rededicate you life to Jesus.
If you have Jesus in your heart, “greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world” 1 John 4:4. You have authority in the Name of Jesus, so you tell that demon, “I bind you in the Name of Jesus!” Start pleading the Blood of Jesus over your mind, body and heart. And your bed, your room, and even your house. Study Ephesians 6:10-18. It’s about the armour of God. Start putting it on, use your imagination.
“Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.” ~ James 4:7
You must commit to seek God in the Bible and pray on a daily basis. And “from your position in Christ, you must resist the devil, renounce participation in his schemes, confess sin, and forgive those who have offended you.”(The Bondage Breaker)
I hope “How to reverse the Satanic baptism ALS Ice bucket ritual” was helpful. It took me months to find the answer. Thanks to a couple of Christians on Youtube who guided me to the right direction, the bible.
I was so shocked, it changed me forever how i look at the media today. The only one who you can and must thrust is yourself and nobody else, except God.
Here’s a challenge: Follow Jesus, not the masses!
THE VITAMIN C CONSPIRACY
"Traditionally, the power of medical sciences has been based on the fear of disease, particularly infectious disease."--Peter Duesberg (Inventing The AIDS Virus).
[Only Psychopaths could do this. It has been known for decades (centuries, see Diet/nutrition re smallpox) that we are chronically depleted of vitamin C, and for 60 years that it will cure, ameliorate, prevent or reverse numerous diseases, (eg infectious diseases, cot-death, Heart Disease) as shown by Linus Pauling, Irwin Stone, Dr Klenner MD, Cathcart, M.D., Archie Kalokerinos M.D., among many others, but the medical mafia have suppressed this knowledge, mostly by completely ignoring it, and CODEX is their latest attempt to suppress it. All the media (UK and USA) have been sent the research on Vitamin C reversing heart disease, by Owen Fonorow, at least a decade ago. Vitamin C as medicine would completely destroy the medical industry which is why they are quite happy to let millions die from infections (e.g. over 10 million from Sepsis), cot-death and heart disease. Without the Disease Protection Racket it would collapse, and the Matrix along with it.]
The ORIGINAL ANONYMOUS SUPPORTED A DICTATORSHIP AND STILL DIES TODAY
This is what Hampstead is in fact all about
Why did the vatican choose Hampstead?
FOR REVENGE THAT IS WHY
[link to freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com]
Sir William wade Hampstead
Tower of London inquisitor of the gun powder plotters
Hampstead is payback
Opus dei headquarterd in england
They chose Hampstead
The satanic cult is mi5
In conjustion with the vatican
In conjustion with the trators on the biritish govenrment
The judiciary which is under eu vatican judiciary laws
The agiators are annonymous which is a vatican led campagin of further disruption whos motto is the catholic terrositi guy fawke
Whos emobidiment otherwise id the mianstrea truth tellers
Such as icke jonsy boy brand and the rest
Along with the church of england which is in communion with the whore of rome the mother of harlots
Their psyop's invole real not fake , child rape
The Hampstead event
Is mi5 vatican led promotion of child abuse AND IS A PSYOP USING AN ACTUAL CASE OF ACTUAL CHILD ABUSE
Involving the uk government and the vatican
In a place of historical revenge over catholic persecution of the first and
Original ANONYMOUS by ENGLAND CENTURIES AGO
Thread: breaking news BBC exposed helping to cover up child abuse testimony
That is why
Sir william wade Wade and family of Hampstead
William Waad was responsible for the interrogation of the gunpowder plotters in November 1605 and was present at the interrogation of Guy Fawkes, amongst others. Another unfortunate was Nicholas Owen, famous for his expertise in the construction of priest holes; the one at Sawston Hall being the most well known example. Owen was asked to divulge the whereabouts of the priest holes he had constructed at various Catholic houses but he steadfastly refused and died horribly under torture. It is not known if Henry Huddleston was interrogated by Waad for his possible involvement in the Plot, as Nicholas Owen had previously visited Sawston Hall to construct the priesthole. We know Huddleston had to pay a hefty fine and had his Essex estates confiscated. As he had escaped being executed it has been suggested that he may possibly have had a hand in betraying the plotters.
Family and Education
b. c.1546,1 1st s. of Armagil Waad of Belsize House and his 1st w. Alice, da. of Richard Patten alias Wainfleet of London, Clothworker and wid. of Thomas Serle (admon. 11 Jan. 1541) of Essex and London, Butcher; bro. of Thomas.2 educ. G. Inn 1571.3 m. (1) lic. 15 Jan. 1586, Anne (d.1589), da. and coh. of Owen Waller of Battles Hall and London, Fishmonger, 1s. d.v.p.;4 (2) by 1597, Anne, 1s. 8da.5 suc. fa. 1568;6 kntd. 20 May 1603.7 d. 25 Oct. 1623.8 sig. W[illiam] Waad.
Servant to 1st Lord Burghley (Sir William Cecil) by 1577;9 agent, Denmark 1582,10Holy Roman Empire 1583,11 Spain 1584, France 1585, 1587,12 Low Countries 1585.13
Clerk of PC 1584-1613;14 commr. to search for Catholic traitors 1594-5;15 muster-master, Low Countries by 1600-16;16 member, High Commission, Canterbury prov. 1601-11;17 muster-master-gen. by ?1599-at least 1620;18 lt. Tower of London 1605-13;19 recvr. and overseer, Cheque of Ire. bef. 1606;20 commr. enforcement of starch monopoly, 1607-9.21
[Quote is two comments from the same thread, link is to the earlier comment]
About fifteen years ago, I got ahold of this remarkable little book titled I was an NKVD Agent by Anatoli Granovsky, who defected to the West in 1946. Other than its lack of a plot, it reads like a spy novel, so I don’t know how much of it is true, but it was published in 1962, so it has some relevance here.
One of Granovsky’s potential missions following the Soviet victory in WWII was to infiltrate the West. He was to use two angles: one of which was to seduce women of high social standing who were active in social justice (e.g. feminism, civil rights, etc.); the other was to be a fake priest/minister.
So according to Granovsky, the top tier of Soviet intelligence had already identified the ministry, the sexual revolution and civil rights as key weaknesses to be exploited by communists by the end of WWII. This would explain a lot.
I strongly suspect that MLK was indeed handled by the KGB, probably not only through Levison but others as well. I doubt he was personally aware of it, but a man like that doesn’t need to be — he’s most useful just stirring up trouble with his sermons, sleeping around and not asking questions about where the money comes from.
Conservatives now (shamefully) often claim King as one of their own, so this is still important. King’s false Christianity also has to be exposed as fraud. Why was a Jewish communist (who prominently defended Julius and Ethel Rosenberg) writing sermons for a Christian pastor, anyway? To spread the good news about Christ? Give me a break…
For those of us who had to endure MLK day rallies and indoctrination sessions in grade school, and hated them, this is vindicating.
Before we Americans can move forward with a truly just, truly Christian solution to racial strife in our country, this fake Christian state cult of MLK has to be banished.
<a href="http://chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/4151779.html" target="_blank">Fort Worth pastor indicted on rape under guise of casting out demons</a>
Owens told her that a sex spirit and lesbian demon were inside her and needed to be cast out, police said. The pastor then asked her to lie on the floor and began yelling at her as if she were a demon, saying, "Loose her in the name of Jesus," according to an arrest warrant affidavit.