Similar posts

Anonymous #fundie quora.com

Let me tell you my story. I used to be an hours praying, Bible disecting, days fasting Christian who used to go to church every day of the week that there was a service (which, at the time was 4 times a week, including rehersals). I could see the influence of the Devil in any source of media. And make a good argument by the bible. I was never irrational.

How I felt about dragons. There was a time when I did not like dragons. Because dragons associated to snakes associated to the Devil. I didn’t really mind snakes. At the time, I just thought they shouldn’t be kept as pets, but they are still God’s creation, and God used snakes. Like Moses’s staff, or the bronze snake in the desert. But dragons are not creation of God. What is the dragon?

To me, the dragon was the devil pretending to be God. Specially Chinese dragons. The snake was a clever creature in the garden of Eden, who gave Adam and Eve the knowledge of right and wrong (in other words, stole their innosence, corrupted their innocent minds). Asian dragons are wise, and they impart knowledge to mankind. So, these are not ordinary snakes God’s creation. These were the snakes representative of the Devil. That’s what dragons were to me.

To me, the Asian dragons were born as any other mythology. Distortion of the truth and some influence of the Devil. The dragon had been given aditional features to be more awesome (in the more traditional sense), and had been made big and celestial, and even been given power over nature. It had become a deity. The dragon was a god, like the Devil has always wanted to be.

So what about the other dragons? To me, they were still representatives of the Devil. Maybe not worshiped gods, or at least not directly, but devilish snakes stealing the love of the people. Dragons are cute and friendly? Demons are shapeshifting deceivers. They can be cute and friendly too. To me, dragons were teaching people to accept demons if they are cute and act friendly. Because they only pretend to be, but they really want to condemn your soul. Or at least, that was my perspective. And hey, according to Islam, there is a slight possibility that demons can genuinely turn good. Anyway:

I also did not like when I spent nine hours in fasting and prayer and reading the bible and singing christian songs in my room all by myself, and felt in communion with God, but went to my Christian uncle’s house to visit, and we would watch a movie, to which I would be tempted not just by myself, but by my family. And even if the movie was not about anything of the Devil, when we would finish watching the movie, that feeling of communion with God was gone.

Despite that, all my life I have been fascinated by lizards and dinosaurs. So of course, I was naturally fascinated by dragons. But the bible says “deny yourself, pick up your cross and follow me”. And that’s what I did. A few months after, I read Job. I have read like 66% of the bible. I had heard of the leviathan before, but most of the time, I forgot, and also, because I had only heard about it, I did not know what to think. Even after I read about it, I was not sure what to think. I was going back and forth between my bible and my nearly 10lb biblical dictionary. And I read the psalms. Specially psalm 104. After a while, it seemed more reasonable to me that leviathan is a real animal. And dragon is no more devil than it is wolf or snake. Dragons are no more devils than lions are gods. God is not literally a lion, and even if he were, that doesn’t make all lions gods. The Devil is not literally a dragon, and even if it were, the rest of dragons are not devils.

But most dragons are not like leviathan either. And those that are, often are compared to gods. Like Godzilla. Btw I also did not like Godzilla because people compared him to gods. And Godzilla is not a dragon, but one of the most similar things to leviathan.

So, dragons were still representative of the devil to me for a while. But later I started thinking about it. Were they really representative of the Devil? They were mostly just like normal animals. And then I stopped thinking of dragons as the Devil.

But I still had all the other issues with fantasy and dustraction and stuff. So yeah.

chadzgirl7677 #sexist archive.fo

Am I the asshole for seeing female friend even if my SO disagrees?
I have this female friend I used to spend a lot of time with, chilling or going out with no love/sex involved at all. When I met her I was single but not interested in a relation and she was with her BF (then they broke up, and I hooked her up with a good friend of mine and they're doing great). We were never really interested in each other romantically, it's just we had interests in common, which gave good conversations, good laughs and way too many spliffs smoked.
My SO never really liked her (even though I've known her before meeting my SO). My SO can get quite jealous. We've been together for a bit over 1.5 years and living together for the past 5 months.
Every time they would be both in the same setting, they would not talk to each other and they hate each other (SO thinks my female friend is a player and a bitch, my female friend because my SO is rude with her for no apparent reason other than jealousy)

I had all the usual "jealous GF" clichés: "She's more important to you than I am", "You know I don't want you to see her 1 vs 1", "You're doing it on purpose", etc.
She's been crying for 2 days, not talking to me, and all that because I'm having lunch with my female friend.
​

Unpopular opinion here but, YTA. I guess it really all depends on how committed you are to your partner. If I was doing something that made my husband uncomfortable and he made me aware of it, I would stop doing it. He would do the same (has done the same) for me. Do you want to make her uncomfortable? I wouldn't want my SO to feel that way. Do you two hang out with your SO? If not, why is it so important for you to have one on one time with this friend? Your gf being excluded has got her imagination going and that's a hard thing for a woman to control once it's started going down the wrong path. Going out with your gf and friend might help her get over any insecurities she has... but if it doesn't, I guess it comes down to who you value more. We all make sacrifices for our loved ones. Honestly, it sucks sometimes, but if she were hanging out with some dude you'd probably feel a little uneasy about it, right? Try looking at it from her perspective. I don't think your gf is controlling, I think she is telling you how her actions make her feel and it doesn't sit well with you because it involves a good friend. Your gf is entitled to her feelings, sometimes women have gut feelings and they are spot on. Sometimes not, but why let her suffer the extra stress? She just doesn't want to lose you. And you may not be intending to be romantic with your friend, and your friend may not be intending to be romantic with you, but that doesn't mean it won't happen. Do you discuss your "controlling" and "jealous" girlfriend with your friend? If so, that's already crossing a line.
​
Lots of people would love to have someone that cares about and loves them enough to be jealous.
​
Commence down voting, I'm cool with that.


if my husband was uncomfortable with me leaving the house without him, I wouldn't.My mentality about relationships isn't unhealthy. Either you are committed to your partner or you aren't. It's really quite simple. I get everything I need from my partner and from my girl friends. The other men in my life are family.

Gymcelled #sexist incels.co

[JFL] Normies I know are sharing articles on how to remain mentally sane during corona lockdown

They literally can't fathom being lonely and sexless for just a few days lmao. They're in complete panic mode, it's like they're about to face the firing squad.

Some foid I know shared articles on being sexless/away from your partner for the coming days.

Some guys shared articles about what to do when you're at home. Because apparently normies have no fucking clue what to do when you're home.

goes to show how fucking weak and pathetic normies are without muh social circle. "but sex isnt important" "having a gf wont cure you're depression" all while these faggots are already depressed because they have to "isolate themselves" for a couple days

I always knew this was pure bullshit because normies can't fucking stand not having a gf or going out with their friends. They tell us having a gf isn't important, yet they complain after being gfless for just a couple of weeks.

I remember in hs normies would complain about being sick for 3 or 4 days and not being able to go to a party or hang out with their friends.

I remember one time this chad got into an argument with his friends, so they stopped inviting him to every event for a few weeks. He had a "depression" because of it. But then they got back together and everything was fine of course.

I don't know whether to laugh at them or be angry. These Normie fucks have mocked us and downplayed what we go through, yet they can't go to a bar for a few days and cheer for some cucked sports team and their world caves in.

The best part is i tried warning normies, i told them to get some supplies, stock up on food. They told me i was paranoid and overstressing this "flu". Now they're in full panic mode because the stores are fucking empty and lockdown is coming soon. Fuck you you normie ass bitch. Should have listened to me.

Let them starve. They thought they were too clever to listen to a smelly Inkwell JFL

I also stocked up on soap, shower gel, shampoo, toothpaste, mouthwash etc

I'll be clean af while the normies reek lmao

And they call us smelly JFL

College was a massive blackpill, normies would come to class after a night of partying. They were sweaty and reeked of alcohol and/or vomit. Disgusting.

Your_ACT_Score #fundie reddit.com

I consider myself to be quite an extreme atheist but
I cant stand homosexuality. Period. I was born in China and never knew the existence of religion until I was in high school. And hearing the arguments for and against religion it was quite clear to me that religion is a joke. I honestly thought back then that Noah's Ark was like the story of Santa, I still think so today. After watching videos of "TheThinkingAtheist" and reading some papers, I became quite an extreme atheist BUT I cant stand homosexuals. And I want to know why many of you are for homosexuality. My religious friends support it because of the bible, but I see it has nothing to do with religion, to me, homosexuality is simply...disguesting The sad part is, I hate homosexuality for the same reason why I hate religion: the effect it has on the helpless young. Religious parents at times teach their children and force them into the same belief, this has been talked many times and we all know. Homosexuality affects the young as well. Not having the love and care of a father or mother is greatly detrimental to the young, which again, is innocent and do not have a choice in this matter. It is the most frustrating when religious people think I am also religious due to my view on homosexuality but in reality I am an atheist, and I am confused on what to do..
Edit: I am currently homophobic cause the reason for it far outweigh the arguments against. Research and study that has shown Gay related immune deficiency are a good part of the reason why the bullies did what they did. No one wants HIV and AIDS to spread, one of many reasons why I was homophobic. I came to see reasoning and some proper arguements but most of which was just insults and logical fallacies, though I do appreciate a few quality posts that did have some good points. I will look elsewhere for futher data, have a good day :)

I am hateful toward the homosexual parents. A bit more info: When a whole group of children decide to form together and reach a consenus to bully the same child, there has to be a good reason behind their actions. Back then I couldnt even save my friend, maybe I can stand up to 1 or 2 bullies, but not 10+, I lost a precious friend and for a whole month I can do nothing but watch him suffer. I thought to myself "1 bully might be a jerk, but 10+? , what did the kid do to deserve this?" Then I found out it was his parents when I reported to the teacher, and the fact that an adult choose to side with the children too fully convinced me it was the fault of the kid's homo parents. I made this post in hopes of ways to convince me otherwise, but all I got so far was mostly insults, which only futher convinced me against homosexuality.

[ Dude, really "I'm a bigot who is also an atheist" is all you should have typed.
The only difference between you and the religious bigots is you don't have an imaginary friend to blame it on.
]

Most Ironic post of the year... Here I am backing my arguments with reasoning, if you disagree then provide your counter arguments and support them. Instead you chose to throw an insult at me, now whos the one intolerant of other people's opinions?

I will teach my children rape, murder, and homosexuality are wrong until someone proves to me that homosexuality, unlike murder and rape, is not a wrongful behavior that harms others. Just because you are not affected, doesnt mean others arent.

First of all, saying I might be gay is similar to debating a Christian and him/her saying "there are no atheists, you just hasnt recieved the blessings etc". And about the citation, the effect of 2 parents of the same gender does not belong to this sub, but from personal experience I had a friend who had homosexual parents and was bullied by others, worst of all, on purpose or not, the teachers did minimal to help. Finally, I didnt make this post to say "We should hate on homosexuals" but rather express my troubles since I need others to convince me to accept homosexuality as I want to fit in with you all, calling me disguesting serves no purpose.

The parents will love their children the same way hetero parents would, but what about others? After a teachers conference, a friend of mine who had homo parents (that loved their child) was bullied each day into deep depression and I never saw him again (I assume the moved to another school)



Cussing at me here isnt going to save the kid from bullying and everything happens for a reason. Look at the root cause, would there be homophobia without homosexuality? His parents made the decision and the innocent kid suffered for HIS PARENTS decision. Bullying is never right, but that does not excuse his parents.

I_Fail_at_Life #fundie love-shy.com

I am talking about the anti-Christian, anti-white, anti-man, pro-gay, pro-immigrant mentality that we are seeing today. Lately I have seen young people talk (aged like 17-20 years old), and they scare me to death. These kids were heavily brainwashed by liberal propaganda since a young age, and they really seem to believe this crap. Not only that, but they are extremely intolerant and they have a propensity for violence. If you say anything they consider not acceptable by their cultural marxist standards, they will call their 200 friends and intimidate you. Also, they constantly make protests and harass people. Luckily, these people have not real power, but it might be coming soon. They are able to restrict freedom of speech more and more every day, by making protests and complaining each time someone in the medias say something they don't like, and everyone is bending over to their demands. It's ridiculous now.

This is getting out of control. Personal attacks, bullying, intimidation from cultural marxists is a daily occurrence. I can see how these people will try to gain power and make a bunch of restrictive laws to restrict speech and opinions. Are we going to soon live into some sort of cultural marxist dictatorship?

What do you think?

Homo-Erectuss #sexist reddit.com

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Incels don't need to get a gf or to "ascend", they need a healthy lifestyle structure to fill in the social gaps and improve their mental health

IMO, there is no such thing as "ascending". Women in 2019 DO NOT love you and never will, they don't even love chads now a days. They wont be loyal, they wont not cheat, they will still fish for attention with half naked pics on Instagram for chads. This is why we say AWALT, when you have the scientific blackpilled understanding of sexuality and dating you will understand how hypergamy and social media/tinder/societal expectations of promiscuity all coincide to create a population of people who get unlimited attention and sex with all the mental consequences of such (daddy issues, arrogance, snobbery, hating low value men, etc). Fact is that dating any of these women long term is a terrible idea, as you are and will always be a low value male to some extent. If you do manage to "ascend" your gf will either demand to open up the relationship, or cheat on you, or monkey branch off you to the next guy. There is no winning in America in 2019.

Instead, IMO, we need healthy structure in life that can improve our mental health and well being, all while understanding our place in society and the course of a society that chooses to go down this path. A lot of people here will say "just rope" but I disagree. We are human animals, survival is in our instinct, and i'm gonna assume a majority of people here don't want to kill themselves and want to see their lives improved. The specifics of such is up to you, but over the past two years I basically dedicated myself to improving my mental health and my life in general. I moved to a bigger city with a lot of job opportunities after college, I got a decent job with flexible work hours (it pays ok but I'd much rather have more free time than more money). I have a close knit group of friends who are nerds just like me, and i'm in the best shape ive ever been.

And Im still an incel virgin, and I still struggle with loneliness and wanting romance sometimes. Im obviously not trying to brag or trying to say that doing these things will make your life complete, just that itll make it better. That feeling will always come about. But whats the alternative? Is it to go MGTOW (and cope into thinking that eating shitty food and "your going your own way" rather than mstow)? Is it to marry a chad widowed roastie who will divorce you and take your shit? Is it to become a soyboy and be the cuck in a relationship? What is it? If you would rather kill yourself, it is ultimately your life there is nothing I can do about it but for the 90% who would rather survive I implore you to atleast try to live an alternative lifestyle (and by that i mean don't wageslave 40 hrs a week every week for a job u hate) and bring some positive elements into your life so that you (mostly) don't need women.

Dating a female in 2019 will not fix your problems and will in fact create more.

Also, if your interested in this type of thinking check out r/the_graypill if your blackpilled but not nihilistic or autistic about it like on larpers.co.

mr.z #fundie banoosh.com

people why it is not beneficial to participate in, if in fact there was something wrong with it. I have precious friends and family that have participated in the challenge and I want to make it clear that I am not wanting to offend anybody or condemn anybody who has done the challenge.

If you did it in innocence, then I don’t believe God holds it against you but I do believe that if a Christian participates in it, they should ask God to forgive them and break off any resulting curses. Let me tell you why. After spending time in prayer and doing much research today, I was really bothered by the fact that this Ice Bucket Challenge was bothering me and I didn’t know why. It was on my mind a lot and I kept asking God why. After much prayer and research, I found that the founder, Corey Griffin, of the movement seemed like a good guy. I didn’t find anything wrong with this kid except that he died last week and was unfortunate.

Is his death related to the challenge or is it just a misfortune? Yes and no. On the surface of things, the whole challenge seems like a good cause. It basically is creating awareness to raise funds for Lou Gehrig’s disease, which is a disease of the nerve cells of the brain. The Ice Bucket Challenge is to throw a bucket of ice water on yourself or give a donation towards ALS which does research for finding a cure for the disease.

This is what I found out and what God showed me in my research. ALS uses some of their funds towards Embryonic Stem Cell Research. When I saw that, I finally knew why I was bothered by this challenge in my spirit, but yet still seemed harmless. But I can’t support human embryos being used and destroyed for such a thing. I can’t support killing a baby for this cause. What also bothers me is that the devil himself has come in through the back door to lure the unsuspecting to participate in a ritual that basically signs a contact with the devil to participate in a kind of abortion.

The phenomena of the craze on social media is fueled by a deceiving spirit that brings death. Is it possible that Corey Griffin caused his own death? I hate to say it and it sounds hard and he seemed like a nice guy but this is the perfect picture of the innocent dabbling in something that has originated from hell itself. A life was taken. An innocent life.

This depicts the fact and is a prophetic message that innocent life is taken to try and find a cure for this disease. God definitely wants there to be a cure, but not this way. This whole Embryonic Stem Cell Research is man’s idea, not God’s. It is man’s way of acting out to “be God” in deciding who lives and who dies. This just should not be. I get sick to my stomach thinking about it. So now that I think about what what my friend said that their ex-satanist friend said about the ice bucket ritual, I see very clearly what God is saying through all this.

The enemy has come into America through the back door with what seems like a good work and a good cause but it is only on the surface. As you dig a little deeper and take the time to research, you will see that what I am saying is true. This is a type of sacrifice. It is a type of satanic sacrifice. All these human embryos are being sacrificed. A type of cannibalism is occurring because this craze and this phenomena is causing people to give into this one fund and neglecting other good and noble foundations that have have better causes and more moral ones.

There is definitely a spirit behind this cause and it is not the Holy Spirit. God would never endorse such a fundraiser that supports using human embryos for research. It is abortion, plain and simple. To all those who have already participated, there is no condemnation, but there is a plea from the heart of God to pray, seek his face and ask forgiveness. I really didn’t want to post anything for or against this challenge.

I didn’t want to get involved. But The Lord challenged me to speak the truth and I have done so. Though this post is lengthy, it is very important to pay attention to what God is saying here. Let there be a lesson learned. WE MUST KNOW WHAT WE ARE GIVING INTO! We should only give into good soil.

I have concluded that the Ice Bucket Challenge is not good soil to sow into. I also pray for those who have the Lou Gehrig’s disease that they will be healed by The Lord Jesus Christ and a more noble and moral research breakthrough for this disease will be found. I’m so sorry for offending anyone because of this post. That is not my heart to hurt anyone. Please hear me on this. I felt it was important to speak the truth and speak what The Lord wanted me to say. I truly love you all. Let me leave you with this final, but powerful thought.

“You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free!”

~ Reeni Mederos

Dean #fundie medium.com

i’m a Youth Worker, I’m a Paedophile
The idea of a paedophile working with children is, perhaps understandably, pretty controversial. This is the story of how I realised my attraction, learnt to live with it and why I’m going to keep working with kids.
I grew up in a coastal town in the UK with two very loving parents and my two younger siblings. I never had many friends and I was bullied a lot, but every week I went to a youth group. I always felt welcomed there. It gave me a safe environment in which to learn, grow and develop as a person, especially in my self confidence. My time there influenced me as a person more than anything else.

I’d already decided by age 10 that I wanted to give back and volunteer there as an adult. I took up a volunteer role when I turned 14 and it’s the best decision I ever made. Sure it’s a lot of work, sometimes it’s like a full time job and it’s only voluntary, but now I get to help children to grow and develop. I couldn’t ask for more than that.

Shortly after starting in my volunteer position I realised I was a paedophile.

Realisation
My sexuality developed pretty normally at first. I started to notice other boys my age when I was 8. Around 11 years old I figured I was gay. Fortunately at the time public attitudes toward homosexuality were changing pretty quickly and my close family was pretty openly accepting of gay people, so I was able to accept myself relatively easily.

But a year later I started to notice something was up. I was still attracted to boys six?—?or sometimes more?—?years younger than me. Why? It didn’t make any sense to me. Fortunately I was still attracted to enough of my peers that I could ignore it. So that’s what I did for two more years.

It wasn’t until I was 14 that I really started to realise the nature of my sexuality. I’d been getting older, but the boys I was attracted to hadn’t got older with me. In fact by this point all the boys I was attracted to were younger than me. I couldn’t ignore it anymore, I had to start accepting that this was the way I am.

To this day my attractions haven’t changed, I’m still attracted to boys from 4–13. I had no choice in the matter, I was born this way, but I did choose never to act on it and never to harm a child.

Acceptance
I was always a pretty scientifically minded kid. When I realised I was gay I asked myself why I was that way, what it was that made me different. Asking those questions it was pretty obvious to me that my sexuality was an unchosen and unchangeable part of myself. If it can’t be changed and it isn’t hurting anyone then I should just accept it and make the best of my situation.

I went through a very similar thought process when I realised I was a paedophile, so accepting it was pretty easy for me once I stopped trying to deny it. As long as I never hurt anyone what was the problem?

But there was a problem. My only knowledge of paedophilia was based on what society had always told me. Society was constantly telling me that I was doomed to be a monster. I knew I wasn’t a monster; I didn’t want to hurt a child and I knew I never would.

I went online to see if I could talk to others like me. Unfortunately the only other paedophiles I could find were pro-contacts, people that believe children can consent. I knew they were wrong, I’d heard about the damage CSA caused, I didn’t want to be like them and I didn’t want to associate with them, but I was bullied, depressed, suicidal, had no friends and desperately wanted someone to talk to about my attraction. So I talked to them. For many years they tried to push their beliefs onto me, but fortunately I never believed it.

I’d be lying if I said I was never tempted by them though. The idea that it’s okay to act on your attractions and that it’s society that causes the harm can be quite appealing. Especially to a young, depressed, suicidal teenager. Fortunately I always knew that what they were saying was wrong; I couldn’t ignore what I knew to be true: CSA causes devastating lifelong harm.

There was always the fear that someone would find out. What if someone did? I’d be hated by everyone, not even my family would accept me. I’d seen plenty of news stories about what people do to paedophiles. Harass them, beat them, even burn them alive just on suspicion of being a paedophile. If someone found out my life could be in danger. I had to keep this hidden from everyone in my real life. I couldn’t risk losing everything if someone found out. Even now, no one in my real life knows.

One day, early this year, I came across an article about people who called themselves “virtuous paedophiles”. This was a group of people like me that were paedophiles but were against all sexual contact with children. I started doing some reading and after a couple of weeks decided to join VirPed. I’d finally found a community that understood my attractions and shared my views. It was quite a relief; if only I had found them when I was 14.

Turning this into something positive
I’ve accepted my attractions and I know I will never harm a child, but now I’m in a position to help others. I’ve now joined a number of online communities for non-offending and anti-contact Minor Attracted People (MAPs), to help people trying to come to terms with their attractions, to show them that they aren’t monsters.

The hate, death threats and suicide bait non-offending MAPs see every day is staggering and sickening. Young teenagers are seeing those messages, internalising the belief that they are monsters; sometimes the hate pushes them over the edge. They often either kill themselves or get indoctrinated by pro-contacts which can lead to them being abused themselves, abusing kids or viewing child pornography. I want to show them that there is another way, before they get indoctrinated by pro-contacts, or give in to the hate.

Hopefully I can educate a few people along the way too and help to reduce the stigma surrounding paedophilia. When you are constantly told that you are destined to hurt a child it can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Contrary to popular belief, helping paedophiles accept themselves is helping keep children safe from abuse. The current stigma just forces paedophiles to hide and prevents them from seeking help if they need it, just increasing the risk they might offend. Demonizing paedophiles might make you feel good, but it’s not helping anyone.

Should I still work with kids?
Most people would say that a paedophile should never be around kids because we are just looking for opportunities to abuse them. That’s completely false. I’ve been working with kids since before I even realised I was a paedophile. I do it because I enjoy it. I have no ulterior motives. I know that my main job is to protect the children in my care and keep them safe; that is what I do. The absolute last thing I want is for a child to be harmed.

Being a paedophile doesn’t mean I lack the normal, protective instincts people have towards children. This is a very common misconception, but if anything, my protective instincts towards children are stronger than most people’s. I find I care more about them and I’m more interested in their well-being.

I love kids, I love working with kids, I’m very good at what I do, I do it because I want what is best for them and I want them to become the best people they can be.

PFOX #fundie news.yahoo.com

WASHINGTON, Oct. 14 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX) is suing the Washington DC Office of Human Rights for failing to protect former homosexuals under its sexual orientation anti-discrimination law. "The ex-gay community is the most bullied and maligned group in America, yet they are not protected by sexual orientation non-discrimination laws," said Regina Griggs, PFOX executive director.

Jeremy and Blessedx4 #fundie rr-bb.com

[Two fundies for the price of one]

Jeremy: People are too easily angered and hateful. I've had personal expiernce with a friend. Her ex-b/f and me are good friends, lives on my floor, she lives on the floor above. She got mad because he had girl visiting him.

She started calling him on phone. calling him names, me names and her names. That night she came down, after the girl left and went right into a rage. cussing, yelling, foaming at the mouth (she's 25), he's 31. She even tried to rip a necklace she gave him off his neck. then she snapped into a crying, winy voice and tried to force herself onhim, to try and kiss him. when he rejected she flew into another rage and started cussing. She called me all sorts of names and said "I hope you die" to me.

Its amazing people are getting angry over petty things.

Its ashame. It's said in the end days, men will be haters

Blessedx4: goodness sounds demonic!

iblamemyself #sexist #psycho incels.co

Does anyone else avoid any moral responsibility with the excuse of being a man? (or an incelman?)

Like... even before the blackpill I kind of already swallowed and digested the male disposability pill. When faced with a moral dilemma, I always thought to myself man, why should I interfere?
What I'm trying to get at is that foids have some kind of unique power. I call it pussy power. They could contribute so much to any social environment or to any social situation. I am disposable, and I have embraced my disposabilty and freed myself from moral obligations.


Like, if some guy is lonely and depressed, a foid could easily save him by becoming his gf or even his friend, some guys dig that. I feel like I can't help, I'm a fucking man, man! He might even get offended from my attempts to cheer him up!

Or when some group of people, ex-classmates for example, are breaking apart. I think a foid with some communication and flirting skills could convince around 80% of guys and girls to meet up again. I can't do that. Fuck that stuck-in-the-past loser, is what whiggers would say. Foids would get offended. Don't assume popularity and don't make a move on us, you creeeeeep!

Or some girl is lonely. Why the heck should I help out? First of all, she can cuck-friendzone any cuck off of tinder. And, these creatures have in-group preference. There will be another cunt coming along soon to save that lonely bitch! What am I supposed to do?

Or why would I be friends with a teacher? Imagine a 8/10 cute foid would admire her teacher, get a bunch of As and would, in all her public speeches, mention how great her teacher was and how much he helped and inspired her. That teacher's life would be complete. He would take selfies with her and keep in touch with her forever. I can't provide that experience for a teacher. Wtf is that gay ass whigger's obsession with me? I just do my fucking job, you funny looking dick. Get yer degree and fuck off, fag.


The list goes on and on. You can write your own if you want to.

Janet bloomfield #sexist judgybitch.com

A shit-faced drunk girl, a football star and a vigilante feminist. The makings of a fairy tale?
image

So back in August, in Steubenville, Ohio, a whole bunch of teenagers got together and did what teenagers will typically do when provided with tons of alcohol and little adult supervision: they got blackout drunk and acted like idiots.

People who will eventually need Ohio inpatient detoxification in the future.

One special girl, an honor roll student and athlete at a smaller, religious school joined the students from the local high school along with several close friends and had a wee bit too much to drink (that can happen). In fact, she got so drunk, she was slurring her words and stumbling about and eventually passed out cold and her friends packed her up safely in the back of someone’s car and drove her home and told her parents she must have the flu or something and she had a wicked headache the next morning and decided she was never drinking tequila again.

Oh, wait. Oops. No. That’s not what happened.

One special girl, an honor roll student and athlete at a smaller, religious school joined the students from the local high school and had a wee bit too much to drink (that can happen). In fact, she got so drunk, she was slurring her words and stumbling about and eventually passed out cold and APPARENTLY HAS NO FRIENDS OF ANY KIND.

This girl (you can find out her name if you like, but I’ll just call her Princess) somehow managed to find herself in the company of not just one, but TWO local football stars, who then proceeded to act like huge jerks, by taping themselves assaulting Princess, who was too drunk to protest and then posting the images on Twitter and sharing them using their phones.

Did I use the word “assault”? Yes, I did. What those boys did was clearly assault, but to describe it as “brutal rape” is a fucking insult to women who have been brutally raped. The boys deserve a slap and a good talking to about being decent human beings, but there is more to this story than is being reported. A whole bunch of things are being left out.

As Jezebel has noted, we wouldn’t even know about the story if it weren’t for a righteous blogger who decided that the “brutal rape” of the innocent Princess should result in some serious jail time for the boys involved. Vigilante feminism in action, where there is only one narrative, and only one possible outcome. The lady is 100% innocent and good, the young men are 100% evil and bad and the complete destruction of the boys lives is the only acceptable outcome, up to and including jail.

What is being left out? Oh, only the whole entire back story of history and psychology and deeply engrained motivations and desires. So Princess shows up at the party without a group of friends to protect her and drinks herself into catatonia.

Why doesn’t she have any friends? An honor roll student and an athlete and she has no friends? Bullshit. How about this? She went to a smaller religious school with a group of girls who know just what is going to happen at a testosterone fuelled drinking party loaded with football players and stayed home that night! Is that what happened? I don’t know, but if it did, it’s certainly a material fact. How can Princess claim she didn’t know what could possibly happen when her friends refused to accompany her? WHY would Princess go to a party without friends and then proceed to get blindly drunk?

Did she want to nail a football star?

football star

Bingo! And being a teenage girl, raised in a slut-walking feminist culture, she probably thought that giving herself some liquid courage and then blowing one of the players might land her a boyfriend. Wrong, Princess. It landed you a night with boys who had nothing but contempt for you. Jezebel and our vigilante feminist blogger would like people to think that the contempt the boys had for Princess is indicative of the hatred they have for all women, everywhere, all the time. Is it possible that the boys thought that Princess, specifically was a slut?

And so they treated her like one (surprise!). And for that they deserve some small punishment. Fingering a passed out, friendless, boyfriend-hunting slut and posting the pictures on Twitter was a revolting thing to do. Shame on those boys.


Everyone in this case behaved shamefully, but I take issue with the fact that only the boys are held legally or morally responsible for their actions. Deciding that ONLY the boys are responsible has some very damaging consequences. First of all, it’s completely infantilizing. Only men have responsibilities? Only men are held accountable? Only men can be charged criminally with sex crimes? At the very least, Princess should be up on charges of underage drinking, public intoxication and indecency. But no, she’s apparently just a victim and can’t be blamed for any aspect of what happened to her.

Second, it tells young women that it’s OK to go hunting high status males, to travel alone, to drink to the point of unconsciousness and to wake up the next morning with no memory and then place the BLAME on someone else. Hey look, shark infested waters! Let’s get super drunk, cover ourselves in fish blood and go swimming! What can go wrong?

How foolish. The fact that the boys in question were so utterly unfeeling and contemptuous towards Princess says something about them, to be certain. But it also says something about HER. And the fact is that no one’s life is going to be ruined by this, if we just leave things well enough alone. The boys have learned that there are limits to how callously they can act (no matter how slutty the girl) and hopefully, Princess has learned that heading out to drink with the big boys without some good friends to protect her from her own worst, most base impulses is also a bad idea.

But cue the vigilante feminist blogger. She won’t let this drop. She wants those boys ruined. Destroyed. Rotting in jail. Completely annihilated. One of the boys is countersuing for defamation, and good for him. But honestly, it doesn’t look good.

And that, my friends, is a problem. When young men, barely beyond childhood themselves are held responsible for their actions, but young women are not, we have tilted the field too far. I can’t imagine what kind of LAW could be passed to hold women accountable that wouldn’t be horrifically draconian and open to wide abuse. It has to be part of the culture. Women need to know that men are not women, and that they will respond in certain situations LIKE MEN.

How do young women protect themselves from men being men? They have friends. They travel in groups. They accept that their own decisions aren’t always going to be wise or accomplish what they hope to accomplish. THAT is girl power. Stick together ladies. If you end up shit-faced drunk at a football party chasing after boys way out of your league, you need some good solid girlfriends to take you home and tell your mom you suddenly came down with the flu.

If someone wants to post a picture of you barfing on Facebook, well, let them. Make sure your two besties are in the shot, holding back your hair and getting you to drink some water. No one ever charged their best friends for being friends.

And always remember, if you want to nab the star quarterback, you need to be a cheerleader. That’s how it works.


Lots of love,

JB

Scott Lively #fundie scottlively.net

Milo and the “Stockholm Syndrome” of Sodom
Posted on February 22, 2017 by Pastor Scott
In the mid-1970s, America was introduced to “Stockholm Syndrome” when 19 year old Berkeley student and heiress Patty Hearst was transformed from kidnap victim to domestic terrorist by identifying with her captors. Stockholm Syndrome is trauma-induced mental enslavement to the person or group causing the trauma, and Hearst has ever since been its poster child. Her identity hijacked, she joined her Simbionese Liberation Army kidnappers and eventually went to jail for crimes she committed voluntarily in that false persona.

In the unfolding spectacle of the Milo Yiannopoulos pederasty scandal, America is being introduced to a far more potent and common form of this phenomenon: Sodom Syndrome. Like millions of boys through the centuries, 14-year old Milo was recruited into homosexuality by an adult homosexual predator. He then justified his molester, “Father Michael,” in his own mind and recently in unwise but candid media comments. Very typically of adult homosexual men who experienced similar recruitment, Milo portrayed Father Michael as a sort-of coming-of-age mentor, and his young teen self as a consensual partner, fully competent to make his own decisions. (Historically, most male leaders of the “gay” movement share this profile).

In response to the scandal, Milo has recast himself as a helpless victim. While this seems cynical, he actually IS a victim to a far greater extent than most people, and even he himself, realize. I believe what Milo experienced at 14 was Sodom Syndrome, and like Patty Hearst to the SLA, his identity was subsumed into the LGBT culture by psycho/sexual trauma, reinforced by associating sexual climax with his predator’s orientation. Its all about brain chemistry and subconscious coping mechanisms, not free choice – at least not at first.

Like Milo I had a bad relationship with my father, and ventured into the world at an early age. An alcoholic from age 12 and a pothead/drug addict from 14 I lived a vagabond/hitchhiker lifestyle that lasted over ten years and spanned the continent. As such I was a ripe target for recruitment by predators and was solicited by “gay” recruiters countless times. To be fair, only rarely did these men attempt force and fortunately none was successful. To be clear, I never experienced same-sex attraction and didn’t succumb to “gay” recruitment, though I don’t believe anyone is immune to Sodom Syndrome.

When I was about 14 or 15, I spent an afternoon smoking pot with a “gay” guy in his 20’s who explained that young people during puberty have a very fluid sexual identity and how easy it had been for him to turn young teen boys into sex partners. I was very non-judgmental in those days, and didn’t think twice about it, nor similar conversations I had with other homosexuals (though few were that forthright). A confirming study I later saw said 25% of young teens suffer same-sex confusion but most grow out of it naturally by the end of adolescence.

After I had surrendered my life to Christ, been delivered from my addictions and started a family of my own, I saw the world in a wholly different light. A nineteen-year old man, who had “come out” as “gay” after being molested seven or eight years earlier, himself molested a four-year-old boy. I was close to both families and watched that child change from sweet and loveable to hyperactive and rage-driven. He never became homosexual himself to my knowledge, but never really recovered either and now in his 40s lives a miserable life of addiction and crime.

Later as my compassion grew for homosexuals, we took in a repentant ex-“gay” who was dying of AIDS. Sonny lived with us for the last year of his life and I was with him when he died. He attributed his homosexuality to being raped at age seven in a YMCA men’s room by a friend of his father. Sonny’s form of Sodom Syndrome compelled him to seek “gay” sex in settings with the strong smell of urine. He never chose to be that way and expressed deep shame in it, but even in his last days in Christ, the pattern burned into his brain by the youthful trauma remained the identity of his flesh while his mind and spirit were freed only through sexual abstinence.

In the earliest days of my ministry I had the pleasure of making friends with Anthony Falzerano, a leader of the ex-“gay” movement. He said the most common denominator in boys who get recruited is a kind-of “father-hunger” due to troubled family relationships, and that this is easily recognized by predators on the prowl because they suffered it themselves. He and other ex-“gay” leaders showed me by example that the cure to homosexual dysfunction is restoration of male normalcy through long-term healthy relationships with fatherly mentors.

My ex-“gay” friend Richard of Portland, OR sought me out in this way after the predator who made him his houseboy at age 12 (his piano teacher) kicked him out and replaced him when he got too old. My fatherly help blessed Richard through some rough times and gave me personal experience in mentoring ex-“gays.” He never went back and is doing well today.

I’m frequently accused by pro-LGBT leftists of being a suppressed homosexual myself because my life’s work has been opposing their agenda. That’s not true of me, but I’m not insulted by the suggestion because I don’t despise homosexuals like they assume. I do this work because I am a Christian saved by grace, trained for and assigned to this work by my Savior. I do it because I recognize that the sin of Sodom is the most destructive force in human civilization, singularly unique in it’s condemnation in the Bible. I do it because I don’t want to see any more young people lose their innate heterosexual identity to the Sodom Syndrome. Make no mistake – the problem is growing like runaway cancer because we’ve allowed it to go mainstream.

Past criticisms notwithstanding, my heart grieves for Milo Yiannopoulos, because I see what I might myself have become under different circumstances and it is hard to watch anyone crash and burn so spectacularly. What Milo really needs is his Father in Heaven, of course, but he also needs a Dad to lead him out of the darkness of perversion back into the light of normalcy. I pray that this crisis will open his life and heart to both. I’m personally willing to help him in that, if he doesn’t have anyone else. I also pray that Milo’s suffering will not be in vain, but truly open America’s eyes to Sodom Syndrome and it’s own sin in pretending – as a way to avoid confronting hard truths and harsh push-back — they’re all just “born that way” and can’t be cured.

onedaily #sexist isitnormal.com

Just speaking from my own experience here. I dont believe in platonic relationships. Unless the guy is gay or impotent. No just impotent, because gay guys would still do it. LOL..

My ex had a lot more guy friends than girl friends. Also her "best friend" was a guy, she told me this in the beginning. I trusted her but in the back of my mind was still a bit leery.

For good reason. She slept with her best friend and another friend. Who knows how long they have been sleeping together, but I was not there to find out. I was gone real fast.

Bottom line a guy will always want to fuck his girl friends, he's hoping to be that shoulder to lean on. Or just hang out get drunk and have casual sex as if its nothing.

various commenters #sexist incels.co

(BarredOut)
[Blackpill] BRUTAL BLACKPILL STORY

Sup boyos, I'm new here but I've been lurking the community since July. Today I wanted to share with you an absolutely brutal blackpill a chadlite friend told me yesterday.

So, about an year ago a few of my friends (two low tier 5-6/10 normies and two chadlites 7.5/10) went to a northern city in my country (EU) to have some fun an try to get some femoids. Basically this chadlite friend who told me the story already had a gf at the time, the other three didn't, and beware since this makes everything worse and obviously exposes femoids hypergamy even more.

So they go out in a club and try to approach some femoids. The other chadlite (the one which didn't have a gf) scored almost instantly, while the two low tier normies both approached the same girl but both failed miserably, first one then the other. My chadlite friend (the one with a gf) wasn't trying to score cause he wasn't interested since having a girlfriend.

Well, guess what the fuck happened. The girl who rejected both of the low tier normies spontaneously approached this friend of mine, sat on his lap, started acting slutty and eventually started making out with him, all by herself, he didn't even had to get his ass up from the chair. And keep in mind the two that got rejected are both looksmaxxed/gymcelled 5-6/10 normies, they both got rejected in turn, so imagine what it is like for us. And keep in mind my friend isn't even chad, he's a 7.5/10 5'8 chadlite, not even gymcelled.

JFL at normies saying that you actively have to try to get a girl, that you gotta do all the work, and that you gotta better yourself and pick up signs a girl might throw at you, lol.

Just a daily reminder that it is beyond over boyos, have a nice day.

(TheRealChincel)
Yeah, nothing revealing here to me but JFL @ thinking guys have to approach.

(Twisted)
And this place tries to act like normies don’t have it bad.

Incels have it far worse though I won’t deny that.

If NT normies get rejected then imagine how badly I’d get shut down considering I’m not NT

(RREEEEEEEEE)
Ok, so they're trying to get some degenerate whores. Not brutal or a blackpill to me, kek

(BarredOut)
wut? Did you read the rest? The blackpill is that they are normies and failed, while the chadlite did absolutely nothing and got the girl. Hence, imagine what it's like for us if normies get cucked like this. That was the point of the post.

(RREEEEEEEEE)
You're 6.5/10 if you looksmaxx naturally (just shaving, doing your hair) so you'd fare better than they'd do. But in a club.... kek, you're shit outta luck.

Yes, I did read the post. But I am anti-degeneracy, so what happens in a club doesn't bother me. Most of us are also aware that if you're good looking, girls approach you, and not the other way around. :p

(Raiden)
>clubbing

Never done this before

(BarredOut)
Don't do it. Having normie friends I've tried sometimes, it' absolutely degenerate and terrible if you're incel. It's literally a blackpill manifestation IRL. Drunk stacies acting as slutty as possible to attract all the chads, it feels unreal seriously. It's like seeing all the theories discussed here taking place in front of your eyes.

MaskedSnarker #sexist removeddit.com

YTA. I’m sorry... I don’t believe my husband would cheat on me but I’m not okay with him having 1 on 1 lunch dates either. I don’t do 1 on 1 lunch dates with guys. To me, this is disrespectful, she’s told you clearly she’s uncomfortable with this friend. And yes... you’re choosing said friend over her. Who has in the past been touchy in Gf’s eyes. Who you’ve shared a bed with. Who you are way too close to.

THAT would make me insecure. You’re supposed to put your SO first... perhaps I’m looking through the lenses of a marriage and you guys aren’t so serious. To be honest though, I’m a bit traditional. I don’t believe in close opposite sex friends. Group setting? Sure. But texting and hanging one and one and being besties? Nope nope nope. I don’t even invite that into my relationship. I’m his only close female friend, and he’s my only man.

We aren’t controlling. We respect each other and our relationship above anything else. We communicate. Your behavior and telling her she’s just gotta swallow that pill is doing nothing to help her insecurity, you’re VALIDATING it. Honestly you should’ve made an excuse to cancel the lunch date OR invited your GF along, or made it a group thing. You should’ve chosen your GF, so she could feel secure that she’s number one. Distance from your female friend and see her in group settings. Yeah it’s a sacrifice. But to me your SO should be worth it.

What should GF have done? It’s eating her up. She’s communicated with you. And you’ve dismissed it as crazy.

So what kind of man would you be if you distanced from female friend? The kind that puts your girl first, and does what he can to reassure her.

You’re more worried about Friend than GF.

If that’s toxic don’t ever get married. If you told me to swallow that pill and you’re going to lunch because I’m controlling and whatnot KNOWING I already had issue with this friend? I’d tell you to go fuck yourself. Sorry. Honest truth.

You two may not be compatible.

I’ll probably be downvoted, but I don’t care. I see where GF is coming from. I feel sorry for her.

Reddit is always on the side of omg she’s jealous oh so controlling!! No one should ever tell you what to do ever. Everybody can always be friends with anybody.

To me they call that too fast. She’s not cutting all your friends off or trying to. She’s uncomfortable with this ONE friend, for good reason. You need to communicate and take her feelings seriously.

ALSO- can we rewrite this real quick?

My BF has this female friend from before we were together. He always talks about her like she’s he’s best friend, so close they even shared a bed but he insists there’s no attraction and never has been. I tried to be okay with it but she was always getting touchy and in his personal space which made me uncomfortable. I brought this up to him and he distanced a little and kept to group meetings. Now she’s popped back up and invited him to lunch to catch up. Knowing how I feel about this, he accepted and now I’m feeling insecure, especially when he already knows my feelings in this. I told him I don’t want him to go, it’d make me feel like he’s choosing her over my feelings but he told me I better swallow the pill because he’s going. My emotions are spinning and I’m crying and he doesn’t care— he’s more worried about making a statement about how I can’t control him. I’m not trying to, it’s just this one girl really upsets me but I don’t know what to do because when I try to talk about it he just calls me jealous and controlling. But I can’t let this go.

AITA for being uncomfortable with this?

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Jade Helm and the Texas Power Grid

This isn't uncle intel but friend intel. This information comes from a friend I grew up with all the way from elementary school to high school and beyond. We're both in our 30s now, and I would trust him with my life. We've both been following the Jade Helm news very closely.

My friend works for ERCOT, and if you don't know what that is it's the Electric Reliability Council of Texas and they manage the Texas electric power grid. For those that don't know, Texas is the only state in the U.S. with it's OWN power grid ( [link to www.slate.com]

My buddy told me that the military sent representatives to ERCOT (he witnessed them there himself), and when he asked his boss what was going on he was told that the military was trying to get permission to run drills at various electric utilities. That's when it hit me that Jade Helm is not about preparing for a foreign country, they're preparing to take on Texas, and to take out Texas it's vital to take out the independent Texas electric grid.

Have you wondered why there are wooden shoes in the Jade Helm logo? It's because they represent sabotage. The word sabotage comes from the Netherlands in the 15th century, when workers would throw their sabots (wooden shoes) into the wooden gears of the textile looms to break the cogs.

Jade Helm is about sabotaging vital infrastructure in Texas, especially the INDEPENDENT TEXAS POWER GRID.

starinhand #fundie worthychristianforums.com

I'm pretty sure if you read all of this you'll probably just think I'm crazy. I live in Brampton Ontario and I'm 100% sure there is demonology and witchcraft running rampant in my town and I've been struck by it. I wont explain the giant details of the story but I know one ex friend of mine by the name of Paul (*Mod Edit) and one by the name of Ryan (*Mod Edit) are involved in witchcraft or demonology. One has shown me magic and has repeated word for word what I was thinking. One night I was out at this little lake side area when walking shadows began ot appear around me... all wearing these black hoods, I could communicate with them in my mind. At one point I lied back on a rock and looked up at the stars and I noticed they all would disapear except one then that one star would begin to move thats when I got a bit freaked and closed my eyes... at that point I felt like a knife or dagger went into my neck when I opened my eyes I heard the voice of my once friend Paul (*Mod Edit) say "Damn I nearly got him" thats when I went home.

vexic929 #fundie vexic929.deviantart.com

image

Rant
Seriously, if it was for EVERYONE who was bullied then I could totally get behind it 'cause guess what? Homosexuals are NOT the only ones who are bullied! Seriously, they're not freaking special, I and a friend of mine were bullied in elementary and junior high school--for being short! Where's the short people's "Spirit Day", hm? These days, I've even been bullied for being "STRAIGHT" by homosexuals (I'm ace/arospec not that that matters to them apparently)! This is ridiculous, it's hypocritical and it sickens me! Make "Spirit Day" for everyone or get rid of it altogether. (I will add that I am glad that dA has written that it counts for everyone, I just wish others would follow suit)

Just kidding about the "short people's Spirit Day", that would irritate the crap outta me too.

tl;dr
Spirit Day should be for everyone who was bullied, not just LGBT.

[ I get your point of not supporting Spirit Day, but complaining about a marginalized group of people who get discriminated on a daily basis getting their own day to raise awareness about their oppression isn't going to help anyone, sorry.

Also, how on earth can you get bullied for being straight? Are you equating your experience to thousands of other LGBT students experiences of bullying? Just wondering.... ]

They have plenty of other ways they spread awareness, they don't need a day to themselves over an issue that effects everyone.

I've been bullied by multiple people for simply being straight. If you've ever been on the "social justice" side of tumblr it's a wonderful example. I've seen people receive death threats and threats of rape for being straight or cisgendered and be doxxed (have their address and other personal information put online for the purpose of sending people after them) for that reason. I know of someone who was doxxed and their former rapist found their address and stalked them. So no I'm not comparing my own experiences to it because thankfully I haven't experienced it but I'm saying it happens to everyone in varying degrees no matter the orientation or gender.

[ es you're right, bullying affects everyone.

However, Spirit Day is specifically raising awareness about homophobic, trans phobic, biphobic, etc. bullying. You're right on wanting to have a day that raises awareness for ALL bulliying, I agree with that, but the LGBTQ+ community is also right about wanting to have their own anti-bullying day. LGBTQ+ youth are much more prone to be harassed, bullied, raped, suicidal, etc. than cishet youth so it is important to help them out and cater to their specific needs and problems.

If someone who was being racially bullied was being helped out and defended, then the defenders would need to help them out according to their specific needs, which is to counter attack racism. It's the same thing with LGBTQ+ students, except that their defenders would need to know how to stop homophobia, transphobia, etc.

What I'm trying to say is that different groups of people get bullied in different ways and for different reasons.

And also about "social justice" tumblr, if the users who run those blogs are doing that to others, I highly doubt that they are actually social justice activists, or at least the ones who are sane and know what they are doing. If that happens again, you should report them definately.
Sorry if this was long for you to read Sweating a little... I hope you understand my point.
]

I understand your point but I can't say I agree with it. I've seen no clear, consistent statistics indicating that sexual orientation has anything to do with people being more prone to be harassed, bullied, raped, and/or suicidal, and from what I've seen personally it tends to be the exact opposite as most people do not want to be labelled a "homophobe" for fear of being bullied themselves (this isn't to say it doesn't happen of course, as I've said people are bullied for any reason anyone can come up with and there will always be jerks who do so). As such I believe no one group should have its own day for a problem that affects everyone for varying reasons in varying degrees. The point is we need to stop bullying period and not focus on just one group or the other--I see it solving absolutely nothing and generally causing more issues by creating a sort of "us vs. them" mentality.

As far as "social justice" tumblr goes, the number of people who do that whether they claim to be social justice or not is not only incredibly large but it is sadly growing. Reporting them generally does nothing unless a mass of people reports them (as it is on deviantART it seems as well). It happens constantly and there sadly seems to be no way to combat it beyond arguing back which causes more issues and makes more enemies...:|

André du Pôle #fundie returnofkings.com

5 Qualities That Dying Empires Lack

André is a young European who left his decaying country in 2012 for greener pastures. He enjoys exploring subterranean places, reading about a host of interconnected topics, and yearns for Tradition.

Along with blue pill and global governance comes the Hollow Empire. We live in the golden age of marketing, public relationships, and propaganda. Many people are good at crafting appearances and virtue-signaling by the standards of the degenerate mainstream. The cities are littered with awesome, hip images, but this world is full of it.

Cities are full of useless bureaucrats, con artists, effeminate men, and man-jawed women. People are fake. Interests and excessive desires are either veiled under passive-aggressive forms or openly communicated through sheer assholery. No mystery why stoicism came back into fashion among conscious men: when your day is full of fake smiles, you’re better off working on your inner fortress. (And when you’re stoic and poor, bulking on a budget makes you better off as well.)

In such a world, some human qualities are sorely lacking. They are often perceived as signs of weakness, naivete, or as antics. Or some start counterfeiting and misdirecting them.

1. Loyalty

Sheep dogs are amongst the most loyal breeds out there. Have you seen a lot of them in metropolises? Bourgeois bohemians prefer small, frail dwarf dogs that cost a small fortune. Or cats, whose displays of egoism and moodiness are always overlooked because they’re sooo cute.

Loyalty is a noble trait. It supposes courage, constancy, straightforwardness. A loyal parent cares. A loyal citizen does his duty and tends to become a pillar of his community. A loyal friend is someone you know you can count on. Unfortunately, loyalty has been both abused and derided. Since the 60s, the media started associating it with purportedly “oppressive” and narrow-minded people while encouraging sheepish behavior towards the latest craze.

Being loyal to a girl who would only remain if you treat her badly would be foolish. Beyond this, it is hard to be a loyal patriot once you know how much nation-states sent Europeans kill each other for nothing but neoconnish interests. As French writer Louis-Ferdinand Céline said, “you think you’ll die for your country but what you’ll really lose your life for is bank vaults.”

2. Kindness

According to the dictionaries, being kind means having a benevolent, friendly, helpful disposition. In a normal society, kindness would be the sign of a good nature and it would be rewarded. In The Current Year, kindness towards women or strangers will have you exploited then called a loser or hypocrite. Men with low self-esteem started to serve women in exchange for absolutely nothing: this warped beta niceness has become a patron for kindness in general.

‘I’ve tried speed dating and all the dating Apps, but every time I put my real age, all I get are idiots and losers,’ she told the New York Post. ‘I figured, why not make them useful and have them help me around the house?’

She found a match with a man wearing overalls and wielding a hammer in his profile photo and invited him over to install her air conditioning… After he successfully carried out the installation, Bloom asked him to leave and didn’t answer his messages asking her to go on a proper date. (Daily Mail)

Displaying kindness towards freewheeling female hypergamy is the same than being loyal to a brand that makes millions out of sheeple. A sane mind doesn’t do it.

3. Politeness and courtesy

Both words refer to a kind of high culture: refined interests, a genuine concern for arts and belles lettres, a tactful and gallant temperament. Polite, courteous manners thrived during the eighteenth and nineteenth century. They were derided as bourgeois by Bolshevists and promiscuous bohemians. Today, loud-mouthed girls know nothing of it, and both have been turned into either mild-mannered spinelessness or pure snobbery.

The arts associated with politeness, such as theatre or classical music, were appropriated by old money whereas the masses are fed with pop garbage. Actually, you can be polite and courteous if you hop in the right context, then use it as a folding screen for game, Sandor Szavost-style. Otherwise you will come across as formal or distant or snobbish. Indeed, neither do boyish immaturity nor grrly aggressive narcissism provide good grounds for taking a woman’s hand and leading her through an impeccable tango.

4. Forgiveness

Jesus Christ extolled forgiveness beyond revenge. Clear the slate, turn the other cheek. Just like toleration, forgiveness works best when it is reciprocated: I’ll forgive your misdeeds because you will forgive mine, I’ll tolerate your antics because you will accept my eccentricities. When the reciprocal aspect wanes, these qualities turn into sheer weakness. Forgiving a BLM activist who sent your brother into a coma only means giving him a pass so he’ll do the same to you.

The Golden Rule, just as any of its derivatives, only works within a context of reciprocation and mutual trust. German jurist Carl Schmitt noticed the Latin Bible told about forgiving the inimicus, the disagreeable guy you’re squabbling with, not the hostis or foreign enemy who will take your head as soon as he can. There is no point being forgiving towards an enemy you have nothing in common.

Unfortunately, the chaotic Current Year destroyed most boundaries. It is sometimes hard to say who’s an inimicus or occasional yet brotherly rival you can forgive, and who’s a hostis you should always be vigilant of.

5. Patience

Arno Brecker did nothing wrong

As the saying goes, the early bird catches the worm. Being patient, planning, delaying gratification, is part of achieving great things. (Unless you’re picking up a Western whore whom you should bed early). The occult elite does not want you to be like that. Rather, those on the top want you to look for instant gratification.

The social media crack pipe, junk food, porn, and video games are designed so you get a massive rush of dopamine early on and get back there for more. If you go down this road you’ll become impatient, addicted, unable to work long hours without some unnatural gratification.

Of course this mindset makes you dependent, frail, unable to provide for yourself over the long term. Impatience is often associated with neuroticism, immaturity, and seeking external validation.

Being patient—without being passive—is required to tread the long path towards the top of the mountain.

Conclusion

Patience can be exercised alone on a purely Stoic fashion. Being patient only requires mastery of oneself, not of others. The four other qualities are essentially social but hard to exert in an anomous, low-trust society. Our natural propensities, from loyalty to the desire to provide, were misdirected and exploited. This made us wary of society in general and of other individuals in particular. When people are foreign to each other they are bound to screw and get screwed.

The better angels of our nature, yet, are still there. In spite of constant bickering and backstabbing the dissenters are closer to each other than to degenerate normies. Some girls can become reliable housewives. Hipsters who snark at old-fashioned qualities are the kind of people who build nothing. If we manage to build thick relationships again, we will effectively foster a civilization renewal.

some redpillers #sexist reddit.com

Re: Intergender friendships can be worth your time

(mynameismcfly)
Being friends with a girl and being friends with another guy are two different worlds. I always fucked this up until I realized you cannot carry the same expectations between the two.

I think intergender friendships are a net positive if you approach them with the right mindset:

She is not your 'bro'

She is not there for you to spill your guts to

You are not her emotional tampon

She has to provide some sort of value (i.e. she's funny, brings her friends around, pays for drinks/ubers, etc.)

Where I've fucked up in the past is:

- expecting 'girl' friends to be like my guy friends (undying loyalty, understanding bro code, etc.)

- thinking that if I was a good friend she might realize I'm a good guy and sleep with me (LOL)

- being needy and annoying

Where I've had success in the past was when I:

- focused the time spent together on a positive experiences (catching up, group activities, sports, etc.)

- made sure she provided value and reinforced it positively (ex: "I like bringing Katie around because she always pitches in")

- didn't try to hit on her after we became friends (unless she made it clear she wanted to fuck)

In my experience, showing girls that I'm 100% okay being platonic friends (then letting them witness me game other girls) has made them more attracted to me. It's sort of a reverse psychology thing. For the girls who ended up not being attracted to me later (they wouldn't have fucked me anyway), they make for good friends to bring around when I'm trying to game new girls. Win-win for me. If you have a solid group of red pill guy friends who understand this dynamic, it's amplified and you'll always have girls who are dtf around (my entire 4 years in college lol)

It's been said a million times here how preselection works. In my experience having friends who are girls can only benefit you when you're trying to get laid. As long as it's not a beta friendship and you're not in the friendzone; It gives social proof, demonstrating you may be high value, and at the very least it's showing that you can interact with other girls positively, without being a creep.

(mineralranch)
Yeah I agree with a lot of this. I've noticed that you can be friends with girls too but under the very strict conditions that you set forth. They don't care about your shit and don't wanna hear it. They also only really stick around if you're positive or entertaining to them in some way. You can't just chill on the couch and watch TV like you would with a guy friend; it always need to be an "experience". They get bored and complain and it's frustrating because they are completely incapable of just enjoying a moment or the presence of another person. They can only act that way if you're already fucking them.

So yeah you can be friends with a girl, but they're honestly really shitty friends lmao.

(strikethrough123)
People are inherently selfish. Ask yourself this: Would you provide something in return for a service you’ve always gotten for free? You’d likely be offended. “I’ve been getting this for free all this time, now I have to pay? Wtf?”. It’s the same with women. Why would she give up her pussy when she’s been getting validated for free for weeks/months/years.

Pussy is their currency, time and attention is yours.

There are some rare cases where she can offer up something useful other than pussy, like in your case with Amanda, but those tend to be the exception.

(trpjnf)
I’ve experienced something similar. Wouldn’t say I’m really “friends” with these girls, but I do have a lot of girls in my social circle that are either dating my male friends or who are friends with my male friends. Going out to bars with a big group of people that is mostly girls (that you aren’t trying to game) is MASSIVE social proof.

Intergender friendships aren’t the same as intragender friendships. We really need a separate word for it, because men get confused and expect friendships with women to function the same way as with men.

(TheRealIsBack1)
Intergender friendships aren't terrible per se but you shouldn't go out looking for them. One of my coworkers which I befriended is female however she doesn't express feminine vibes so I am not attracted to her whatsoever. She's like a bro to me (raised by her dad and most of her friends are dudes). The biggest thing is to not expect anything from her, do not text her buddy buddy shit. However, she will sometimes try to bring up drama related shit to work which I barely acknowledge and act uninterested (prevents you being an emotional tampon) but at the end of the day, she's fun to hang out with.

Bonus: If she introduces you to her friends.

ChewDrebby #fundie reddit.com

Brother DON'T even kiss a your gf before marriage! WHY? Because I had with my gf (now ex) some boundaries. We crossed them.. a lot. We both broke up and now we both feel dirtier.
What you need to do- stop doing any physical contacts and (if you truly know that she is THE ONE) then marry as soon as you can. Why wait for a wedding? :D I'm totally serious.

Prince Choosy, Prince Choosy:

Don't you ever – don't you ever – lower yourself, forgetting all your standards

Sadness #sexist incels.co

If a girl breaches one of these red flags, then she is unfit for marriage. Be ruthless, don't rationalize or become desperate. MGTOW is preferable to a shitty marriage.

alcohol, tobacco, drug addiction (or use, ever (excluding alcohol, light drinker preferred) marijuana usage (ever),, binge shopping, debt, declining credit cards (ever), talking to ex’s all the time, friend zoning lots of random guys to keep as orbiters, Tattoos, abnormal piercings, short hair (like a boy’s), neon-colored hair, being blatantly manipulative, high-doses of entitlement or grandiosity, high-doses of self entitlement, criminal record that isn’t minor crimes, narcissistic or bipolar disorder, STDs or terminal illnesses, trivial things enrage her, drama queen, brain incapacity to distinguish between intentional and unintentional actions, likes to go out all the time without you, not with friends but to get attention/validation from strangers, doesn’t care if you orgasm, only cares for her own, depressive, problem-creator, gas-lighter impulsiveness, passive-aggressiveness or avoiding conflict to the point where they lie and hide things from you, neglectful / abusive parents, childhood abuse, seeing a psychiatrist, having only male friend, having a lack of female friends, using powerful words in the wrong context (exaggerated) ‘molest’/‘oppress’/‘torture’/‘rape’/'genocide’/‘abuse’/‘illegal’, doesn’t do you any sexual favors/desires except for the position she wants, inability to hold down a job or laziness, control freak, health freak, highly OCD (gets pissed that you left a glass somewhere or you didn’t clean something small and trivial), highly emotional, engages in gossip, oddly skilled at sex, dudes seem to recognize her everywhere and are all friendly & shit, doesn’t care when you try to bareback her, says she likes dancing but can’t do any ACTUAL dances aside from grinding like a degenerate, commitment issues, never views problems as her fault, her promises are flexible, her explanations don’t add up, doesn’t show appreciation, lack of humility, speaks ill of exes, doesn’t know how to cook, listens to rap or emulates black pop culture, nonreligious, remembers offenses and uses it as ammunition, constantly bored and always wants something new, big difference between how she treats you in public vs in private, alpha widowed, rape claims in the past, at any point admits to destroying an ex's belongings, bad/nonexistent relationship with father, has ever taken part in an anti-Trump protest, lying to others, especially during phone calls, frequent clubbing, getting wasted, plastic surgery, makeup, cheating, non faithful in the past, single mom, divorcee, has ever used Tinder / online dating, fucked her within the first few months (6 month grace period), you haven't met her family after 2 months, any type of sex worker, slutty friends, high amount of male friends or surrounds herself with gay bffs, she was in a sorority, she gives an amazing blowjob like a pro, her mother is a whale, she physically strikes you in any manner that is not playful, doesn't want to be seen with you, high partner count, frequently shows up late or blows you off, makes a scene in public, she’s ever had a one night stand, ‘it was just one drunken night in college', victim mentality, black or green nail polish, house/bedroom isn’t clean, disowned by her family, her ex-boyfriends are always hanging around, she came out of a long term abusive relationship with some asshole, giving ultimatums, She is mean to random people, She boasts that she can’t “get along” with other girls, or claims that other girls ‘hate’ her, She constantly talks shit about her best friends, She has no friends, She posts about how she “hates guys”, feminism or extreme far-left views, overly protective of her phone, you met her at work, she asks “how much do you make”, she takes pride in ‘being one of the guys’, traveled solo around the world after college, irresponsibility, avoiding duties, She is younger than 18 years old, She is older than 25 years old, She is older than you, She isn’t a virgin, She isn’t very beautiful, She must be feminine, The idea of being a traditional stay-at-home mother must appeal to her no matter how unrealistic, She must be highly religious and she must opt out of certain acts solely because God commanded her to. There are millions of girls in America who “believe in God” but do drugs/lie/cheat and have countless sexual partners, Make sure she is authentic about wanting a family and to be a good wife and mother. I don’t see the point in getting married if you’re not going to pop two children out of her soon afterwards. Unless she just wants sex. No rush until she wants children.

W. F. Price #fundie the-spearhead.com

The Palin family is in the news again for a dustup at a Wasilla house party, embarrassing themselves and Alaska yet again. This time, the fight was over a remark about Willow Palin, which triggered a brawl that involved young single mother Bristol throwing punches at a young man. The entire clan got into the fight, which ended with two of the Palin men injured (not seriously).

[...]

I know this type of feminist all too well. In fact, if anyone is responsible for my strong opposition to feminism, it is exactly these kinds of people, with whom I very unfortunately have had a lot of experience. Not so much the enfeebled, overeducated, passive aggressive East Coast types, but rather the real, Western shoot-to-kill and take no prisoners feminist archetype; the kind of women who “go to war” during divorce by using methods calculated to have at least a chance of killing their opponent. I mean real killing, like, dead.

Given Palin’s continued influence in the Tea Party, I have to conclude that the Tea Party is not in the least anti-Feminist, and in fact may be somewhat inclined to support the lawless, family-wrecking type of feminism practiced by the Palin clan. Unfortunately, the mainstream Republicans are not anti-feminist either, although they may be a bit more moderate than the Palinites. What this means is that there is no one party that supports men’s interests; only less bad parties and candidates.

[...]

In the meanwhile, if you’re a young man or have a young son, keep a close lookout for anti-male patterns of behavior in families regardless of political affiliation.

Here are a few important warning signs:

1. Any allegations against previous boyfriends, husbands, or even in some cases brothers and fathers, even if they didn’t result in any litigation or arrests.

2. Look at families’ divorced friends. If they are mainly women, that’s a problem. It means they chose sides. If there is bad blood between them and the ex-husbands of their friends, stay away.

3. They have lesbian friends. This one is self-explanatory.

4. The women display a sense of entitlement to men and men’s income yet feel no reciprocal sense of family duty or loyalty.

Lookismisreal #sexist reddit.com

Why normies are the biggest cucks on the planet

There is literally no other way around it; normans are literally the biggest cucks on the planet. They will accept to be in the most degenerate relationship ever just to get a feel of being less desperate and miserable than they already are, even though the cum dumpsters they are with are only with them solely because the norman cucks provide for them. Here is a list why normans are huge cucks:

• Normans are okay with their partners not being virgins.

• Normans are okay with their partners having multiple amounts of sexual encounters with random men.

• Normans are okay with seeing their partner getting fucked by Chad/Tyrone as he pathetically jacks off to it like the cuck he is.

• Normans are okay with their partners not doing various sex acts with them because its "uncomfortable", even though the cuntrags have done despicable things with Chad/Tyrone.

• Normans are okay with getting into a polyamorous relationship because they are afraid their bitch of a partner will leave them if they don't.

• Normans are okay with their partner talking with other men.

• Normans are okay with their partner having male friends.

• Normans are okay with their partner still being friends with its ex.

• Normans are okay with getting into a relationship with a single mother and raising Chads/Tyrone's spawns as his own.

• Normans are okay with their partner having crushes on other men.

• Normans are okay with their partner talking about its crushes with its femoid friends.

• Normans are okay with their partner flirting with other men. As the cuck brushes it off as "harmless" behavior.

• Normans are okay with their partner masturbating to pictures/videos of Chad/Tyrone, which is basically virtual cuckoldry.

• Normans are okay with their partners being bisexual cunts who actively engages in sex with their own femoid kind.

• Normans are okay with their partner going out with its femoids friend on a "gurls night out".

• Normans are okay with their partners being on degenerate social media applications.

Lookismisreal #fundie incel.life

There is literally no other way around it; normans are literally the biggest cucks on the planet. They will accept to be in the most degenerate relationship ever just to get a feel of being less desperate and miserable than they already are, even though the cum dumpsters they are with are only with them solely because the norman cucks provide for them. Here is a list why normans are huge cucks:

Normans are okay with their partners not being virgins.

Normans are okay with their partners having multiple amounts of sexual encounters with random men.

Normans are okay with seeing their partner getting fucked by Chad/Tyrone as he pathetically jacks off to it like the cuck he is.

Normans are okay with their partners not doing various sex acts with them because its "uncomfortable", even though the cuntrags have done despicable things with Chad/Tyrone.

Normans are okay with getting into a polyamorous relationship because they are afraid their bitch of a partner will leave them if they don't.

Normans are okay with their partner talking with other men.

Normans are okay with their partner having male friends.

Normans are okay with their partner still being friends with its ex.

Normans are okay with getting into a relationship with a single mother and raising Chads/Tyrone's spawns as his own.

Normans are okay with their partner having crushes on other men.

Normans are okay with their partner talking about its crushes with its femoid friends.

Normans are okay with their partner flirting with other men. As the cuck brushes it off as "harmless" behavior.

Normans are okay with their partner masturbating to pictures/videos of Chad/Tyrone, which is basically virtual cuckoldry.

Normans are okay with their partners being bisexual cunts who actively engages in sex with their own femoid kind.

Normans are okay with their partner going out with its femoids friend on a "gurls night out".

Normans are okay with their partners being on degenerate social media applications.

AbuIncelAlAustrali & hhhh__ #sexist reddit.com

(AbuIncelAlAustrali)
My "Chad friend" at work today said that I am not successful in attracting foids because I am too nice to them, treat them like human beings and I don't d3grade them.

In the real world I treat foids like how I treat men when it is absolutely necessarily to interact with those foul beasts. As a result Chad thinks I treat them with respect and human beings. Chad said he randomly grabs foids by the ass and other quite rapey things and he said that the foids love it.

I did tell him in reply that all that matters is looks and height but he was adamant that if I treated roasties like s3x objects like he did I would slay.

He is of course incorrect but no fucking way I'm forcing myself to be assholes for those things. This interaction with Chad made me hate roasties even more.

I only talk to him because he used to post on /b/ and misc hence he is not fully cucked. All the other men are white knighting soyboys and of course I am not going to be friends with a foid ever again, they can fucking get r3kt.

(hhhh__)
My Chad friend openly stares at foids like an obsessed stalker, and still gets their numbers. He's treated all his gf's like shit, calling them ugly and whatnot. They stay with him until he ditches them. He won't believe me when I say the only reason he hasn't been metoo'd is because he's 6'1 and good looking.

My other friend, Chadlite, is a total sadist that enjoys making them cry. Not one girl has ever broken up with him, and he's alpha widowed many. Explain that to me, IT.

vexic929 #fundie comments.deviantart.com

[ You were bullied for being straight? Yeah, that's totally the same thing. >: Just like LGBT teens that are bullied and ostracized, you had no one to turn to in this society that is so against heterosexuals. You must have felt so isolated in an overwhelming homosexual culture that routinely teaches the younger generations to hate straight people for being born the way they are.

Okay seriously no, LGBT teen suicide is a /very serious/ problem that is steadily getting worse. Even if it focused on one group that is being bullied (and is being bullied /hard/), you don't support an end to the bullying of that group? Do you also get pissy when Black History month rolls around? Do you not support it? I mean, IT DOESN'T INCLUDE LATINOS. They're persecuted too. If we're going to follow your logic that EVERY awareness program must include EVERYONE, we should just make it 'Non white history month'. Boycott black history month, it's totes biased. >:< ]


I
was making a point in stating that. It irritates the crap out of me that this day was made for one group of people about a problem that affects EVERYONE. Everyone is bullied at some point in there life for some reason, it doesn't just affect LGBT. No, I don't get mad when Black History month comes around; why? Because it's about something that affected that specific group of people--the abolishment of slavery and the celebration of the accomplishments of people of that ethnicity.

[ I think it has a lot more to do with your general dislike of homosexuality than any good reasonI. :shrug: Would you be opposed to a 'Spirit Day' dedicated to kids committing suicide over racial bullying? What about 'Adopt a Shelter Dog' day? That doesn't include cats, so are you still pissed when all those sweet dogs get adopted? What about Breast Cancer awareness month? There's more than one type of cancer that affects patients. How about anxiety awareness week? There's more than one mental illness.

No one ever said it *just* effects LGBT. But the day was made in response to a string of suicides by LGBT teenagers- it's to honor them and prevent it from happening again. LGBT bullying is a /big fucking deal/ because the children affected by it live in a homophobic society and often, homophobic households. Unlike a straight kid or even a child of a minority race, they usually don't have a support system to turn to because of that; they can't open up to their families because they have to hide who they are. Having a voice- a day- raises a lot of awareness. That is a /good thing/. And there are plenty of anti-bullying programs that cover EVERY aspect of bullying; is it really so bad to have one dedicated to a specific type that happens to be very bad at the moment?

Basically, it's childish to be angry over what is essentially a good thing. Everyone knows bullying is bad, but there are plenty of people that don't realize how much more devastating it can be for LGBT teens due to the inherit isolation that typically comes with their status. This event /helps/ these kids. And it's ridiculously /heartless/ ]

You're willing to listen and are only looking for an argument (as made obvious by your comments on my other deviations). You won't find one here and responding would simply be a waste of my time, have a nice day.

[ Seriously, nice cop out. It seems to me that YOU are the one unwilling to listen and only interested in further entrenching yourself in your narrow-minded views. Are you so against an honest discourse? *Queerly was being nothing but polite and very articulate in outlining her thoughtful, well-reasoned responses.

Spirit week DOES bring awareness to all types of bullying- how could a week dedicated to bringing awareness not? It is simply targeted at awareness for LGBT youthes, a group which uniquely has less support than most others and thus is greatly in need of awareness. I'm sorry, but being bullied/made to feel guilty about being a heterosexual is nowhere NEAR the same thing, unless said heterosexual is immersed in a largely hostile HOMOsexual community. Were you? Did you have no hetero friends or family members to turn to? Were you afraid of even admitting it? Unless I'm horribly mistaken, of course not. ]

Considering you don't know the situation I can forgive you for calling it a "cop-out". On the contrary, she was anything but nice in her comments on my journal and stamps and was only aiming to make me angry and start an argument.

Furthermore, as I have stated numerous times, I don't think any one group should have a day for themselves when it affects everyone. And did you do any research on this subject? For one thing; it's not a week, it's a day. For another, until this year (and on deviantART only this year for that matter) I didn't see any awareness whatsoever on the day for anyone else who was bullied or any other type of bullying--hardly anyone at all acknowledged that (except for those of us who were irritated about it). And being bullied for another reason than being homosexual isn't the same thing? Since when? It hurts just the same and people are scared to turn to other people for help just the same. There's no difference other than the reason behind it. And to keep people from killing themselves? That's what TWLOHA is for (link provided in case you don't know what that is), which I wholeheartedly support because it focuses on how to solve the problem. It's not about one group saying "oh poor us, we're dealing with a problem everyone else deals with but we're more important!" which is pretty much exactly what Spirit Day is.

[ Well, I suppose you're correct that I haven't seen everything she has written to you, so I'll concede that, but I still think that it is a major cop-out to not respond to her last paragraph up there- I'd be very interested in your response to the points she raised which, as far as I'm concerned, are spot on and I couldn't have put it better.

Oh yes it's a day not a week, that does invalidate my stance. Was I also wrong on what it's about? Oh, no. So never mind it invalidates nothing. I'll admit I was reading quickly as I was a bit upset upon finding an individual who opposes something that I view as being very good and beneficial.

Plenty of groups have days/weeks/whatever devoted just to them- so, as *Queerly asked, do you oppose all of them as well? Or do you just oppose this because you also oppose what you see as a sinful "choice"? And I support your religious choices, it's perfectly fine for you to believe what you do, I'm certainly not attacking that, even if I disagree with it. But it shouldn't be affecting your opinion on how to treat LGBTs, on supporting a movement that is benefical for them, gives them help and awareness that they desperately need. Like I said, everyone knows bullying is bad. IT HAS AWARENESS. Not everyone knows however what is happening to LGBT youthes, and worse, in some of the more hostile areas, it is IGNORED.

Bullying of LGBT is different. How man times do I have to say this? It doesn't "hurt the same"- perhaps it might appear that way to you, if you are lucky enough to live in an area where LGBTs aren't living in constant fear- but let me tell you, that is not the norm. What makes bullying of LGBTS so different is that they are being bullied in a society where they cannot just turn to the adults for help- a society at large that is hostile and often teaches others to hate them. Which is what makes it different from, say, racial bullying, where those children at least have family to turn to and no one says 'you shouldn't have chosen to be black, put some on dye your skin!'

You know what I did when I was bullied? I talked to my mom, my friends, once even the teacher and guidance counseler.

Do you know what *Queerly did when she was bullied? Withdraw in to herself, far too afraid for her safety in her conservative southern community to go to the teacher, and too sick at heart to be able to admit her true issues to her parents out of fear of rejection/hurting them/making them question their beliefs.

To sum it up, I would like to ask what *Queerly asked before she was blocked:
Would you be opposed to a 'Spirit Day' dedicated to kids committing suicide over racial bullying? What about 'Adopt a Shelter Dog' day? That doesn't include cats, so are you still pissed when all those sweet dogs get adopted? What about Breast Cancer awareness month? There's more than one type of cancer that affects patients. How about anxiety awareness week? There's more than one mental illness.

Like I said, groups getting needed awareness isn't a new thing.

I'm not trying to upset you or argue with you for no reason, and you are certainly entitled to your beliefs. However, I am as well and I will try and implore you to stop fighting something that is a good thing. While I myself have seen plenty of LGBT awareness movements, if you yourself have not, then that proves that they need the day, or week, or whatever it is that they're given in whatever way, more than ever.

There are lots of issues in the world. No day or week or movement could cover them all. In this case, this day covers LGBT bullying. I ask again, what the heck is so bad with that?? ]

And this is why I don't think you or Queerly were even listening, I have stated my reasons very clearly NUMEROUS times, including in my responses to both you and her and you continue to ignore them. Since you won't listen to me when I straight out reply with my answers maybe you should try reading some of the other comments, the artist's comments, etcetera which all state what I have said a thousand times. I'm getting pretty sick of being asked the same questions over and over and then not even being listened to when I answer. And before replying I would like to ask you to please do your research--there is nothing, I repeat, NOTHING that sets LGBT bullying apart from other types of bullying other than media coverage and extensive whining. They all have different degrees of severity, the only difference is--like with most minorities--when they are targeted they have the media freaking out and jumping to conclusions.

Here are some interesting statistics: 1 in every 4 kids from elementary to high school is bullied; only 30% of those are bullied because of their sexual orientation. Over 50% of students who were bullied were bullied because of their physical appearance. Only 4% of bullying cases end with adult intervention, 11% of bullying cases end with peer intervention, and 85% of bullying cases have absolutely no intervention--regardless of the reasons behind the bullying.

And, as I stated before, the degree of severity varies with each case, there is nothing to show that an LGBT kid suffers more or less than any other kid who is bullied (unless, of course, you look at one of the extremely biased websites that completely ignores the statistics of a child who isn't LGBT being bullied--unfortunately there are many out there, the majority of which can't seem to even keep a standardized statistic). If you still insist that this day is needed might I recommend you also create a day for every other child who is bullied for whatever reason; go on, make a day for those who are bullied because they are overweight, skinny, tall, short, heterosexual, smart, stupid, non-athletic, mentally-disabled, physically-disabled, "nerdy", poor, rich, black, hispanic, white, asian, unpopular, has a speech impediment, has frizzy hair, has stick-straight hair, doesn't have a boyfriend/girlfriend, stands up for another child who is bullied...need I say more?

[ You truly don't believe that growing up in a society that is hostile towards you and in which you generally are too afraid to speak out doesn't differentiate LGBT bullying from, to use your list, "overweight, skinny, tall, short, heterosexual, smart, stupid, non-athletic, mentally-disabled, physically-disabled, "nerdy", poor, rich, black, hispanic, white, asian, unpopular, has a speech impediment, has frizzy hair, has stick-straight hair, doesn't have a boyfriend/girlfriend, stands up for another child who is bullied"?

If your answer is yes, then I suppose our conversation is at an end because you are correct, we are simply talking in circles. But if you believe that LGBT kids are just whining about their issues as exacerbated by the media... I'm sorry, but I would say that people like you are the reason awareness movements are needed.

Also if you're going to use statistics, please include source links. ]

If you haven't noticed, most people are the exact opposite of hostile towards them nowadays (kids don't necessarily count, children can be very cruel about everything). Such people are actually pretty much glorified (see LGBT celebrities and politicians) now. I've noticed more people being hostile towards me and several of my non-LGBT friends for having a different opinion on homosexuality than I have seen or heard of any sort of hostility towards my LGBT friends (not simply in the area I live in, I have many friends from other countries, states, and cities).

You misunderstand what I'm trying to say. I'm not saying that horrible stuff doesn't happen to LGBT kids and that they're only whining (although they [not all of them] tend to do a heck of a lot of it; as do most minorities), I'm simply pointing out that it doesn't ONLY happen to them so it doesn't make sense and is unfair to create a day just for them, regardless of how much awareness it raises.

There were mountains of sources most of which have been long since lost I'm afraid but a quick Google search of "LGBT bullying statistics" and just "bullying statistics" should bring up the vast majority of them.

Linda Cebrian #fundie rhobserver.com

It started as a plea for societal tolerance. Over 40 years later, it has become a demand for advocacy – by minor children.

On April 19, student members of pro-homosexual clubs in public high schools may remain silent for the entire school day to entreat sympathy for students affected by same-sex attraction and/or gender confusion. This “day of silence” seeks to promote the LGBTQ image as normative adolescent sexual development, thus encouraging a “gay” identity at an early age. Meanwhile, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports the cold fact that 2 percent of the U.S. population engaged in homosexual sodomy in 2010, resulting in 62 percent of all new HIV cases that year.

Schools and parents who allow this event are doing a disservice to our youth. “LGBTQ” is not ontological. No one is born/created that way. Does it make sense to advocate for a lifestyle choice proven to shorten one’s lifespan?

Interestingly, as this “day of silence” stumps for sexual minorities, it does not acknowledge or affirm former homosexuals. So Parents & Friends of Ex-Gays has developed a handbill for students and their parents promoting recognition of ex-gays. (http://pfox.org/school_resources_handout.pdf)

Linda Cebrian
Rhinebeck

good2bwhite #racist niggermania.net

I lived and worked in China for almost 4 years and it is an awesome place. Sure there is pollution, but not many niggers. One time, I was walking around downtown Beijing with my Chinese ex gf and I saw a Chinese woman walking hand in hand with a nigger. All the Chinese that saw me and my gf walking together had no issues whatsoever. They did in fact take obvious issue with the nigger walking around with the Chinese woman. A group of Chinese guys even walked up to the Chinese woman that was with her nigger and in Chinese asked her why she is with a monkey. My gf and I were close enough to hear this and things got interesting. So we kind of hung out in the general area and watched from a distance. I could hear the Chinese woman translate for the nigger, since he was too stupid to know any Chinese. I also could see a rage building in his big buggy eyes. I was waiting and waiting to witness my first chimpout abroad, but it never came. His gf ended up calming him down...which I didn't think was even possible. They ended up walking away. I was blown away. I was blown away that he didn't chimp out, but I was more blown away by how open the hate is against niggers in China. Let's just say my love for China grew even deeper.

P.S. I did live in south China for a while and I know Guangzhou is basically run by niggers now. The rest of China is aware of this and probably "gave" them a city for trade purposes in exchange for all the natural resources they are taking from the Apefrican continent. These resources will be put to much better use in the hands of the Chinese anyway.

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Foids: slight glance = stare = public shaming. You are not even allowed to look in their direction creepy inkwell

image

@Dis_Why_U_Inkel

Lol most girls are too scared to go outside alone let alone yell at some random guy for staring at them. Its more likely she messages chad and tells him about the scary guy STALKING her

@UncleOstarion

Wanna bet % of foids who retweeted this will actually follow through? Lmao. Always signalling, never any action.

@Schizocel

Twitter is such a fucking cesspool. So much sexism on there to, i always see women saying men are trash and it gets 100k retweets

@gillette_man

not to mention youll see them retweet that, then sexually harasas a chad openly on twitter begging him for attention (even if their boyfriend is following their feed)

@TheoTasty

"What the fuck are you looking at"

Foids are really brave until they try that shit on a lowinhibcel lmao

@Reiterem

They should try that shit on a gymlet. There's nothing more powerful than autistic manlet rage after years of rejection

@DefetiveCuckachu

When 4s need to kid themselves that they're objects of serious obsession and desire. JFL. Vanity and delusion, two sides of the same coin.

I can remember when foids were obsessed with stalkers, every foid had one, just ask them.

SURE THING Becky, I bet you catch creepy guys staring at you all the time.

ALL

THE

TIME

@allwissender

Actually I do this. I stare roasties down quite hart. I really take everything in their hot ass, their tits, tighs, face. When there is eye contact, I maintain it. I litterally see how fucking uncomfortable they are and enjoy it. They quickly look away but they know I am still staring.

I know it is not much, but it is still honest work. Help them ascend from tutorial mode to easy mode.

sideeyestanley #fundie reddit.com

I'm 19. I was born female, but I've lived as a transman for 4 years. I took testosterone for 2. I went cold turkey on T last week.
I'm detransitioning because I'm sick of this community. I'm sick of the kind of activism that's done in its name. I'm sick of people who want to beat up old ladies in London, completely unprovoked, because she has a different opinion than them.
It started when I saw all this bullshit on tumblr-- went cold turkey on that fucking site too. Transwomen saying shit like "anything a trans man can do, trans women can do better". Calling transmen "shrimp dick", "fish taco". Transwomen saying that women deserve to be murdered, raped, burned at the stake, because they're TERFs.
I saw this all before I transitioned. It's called male violence, aggression, entitlement. If I have to say through my teeth "transwomen are women" one more time, I'll fucking explode.
I know. I know that not all transwomen are horrible. I know there are incredible transwomen out there. But I can't pretend that they weren't born male, that I wasn't born female, and that we weren't socialized accordingly.
I'm disgusted and frightened by how cultlike this community has become. I lost friends for saying I was detransitioning. I'm going to lose more. No one wants you to say "I'm comfortable being gender non-conforming and NOT transitioning". I was a tomboy all my life. In high school, my transman friend told me I should transition. I did, because I was a fucking idiot, and I hated myself, and I hated being a girl.
I'm sick of being such a sexist fuck. A non binary ex friend of mine always called men with long hair "they/them". They sure as fuck didn't do that for guys with short hair. My sister, talking about our cousin's new baby, was all "she's such a rowdy baby. She'll probably turn out trans."
Why are we medicating people who don't conform? Why are we giving children the choice to make a life-altering medical decision based on sexism, when they can't even get a tattoo? Why are we telling girls who don't want to get caught in the trap of femininity, "oh, well, you must actually be a boy."
FUCK that.
I'm detransitioning. I'm sorry for every and any part I played in trans activism. I was complacent listening to people talk about punching women who disagreed with them. I believed such sexist fucking things. I let other people, the med complex, and stupid little problems like pronouns control my life. There are bigger issues in the world than bathrooms. I'm sorry I spent so much time, money, and emotional effort caring about something that meant less than shit.

Some Incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: And they wonder why we rope😞

image

[1st scene: A lonely boy character looks at a couple, thinking “Why do women only like stupid jerks who treat them like shit?”

2nd scene: A lonely girl character, next to the lonely boy, thinks “WHERE DID ALL THE HOT GUYS GO?”

3rd scene: The man of the attractive couple looks at the lonely girl, thinking “Why can’t I get her attention?”

4th scene: The lonely girl has joined the couple, the lonely boy has a rope around his neck]

(ScrewWomyn)

Foids saying that we reject our looksmatch for stacey is nothing but pure projection

That may have been true in the trad past, where only asset of the foid was her looks and domestic skills, and looks of the man didn't really matter much(compared to his providing ability) and losing your virginity before marriage was not an option if you didn't want to become an outcast. That's the literally only scenario a man rejects his looksmatch for Stacy

(Flux_7)

Fucking feminists pieces of shit. Not one single subject can they stop lying about how le women are oppressed.

Most women are innately submissive and Western civilisation was better unified when gender roles were the clearly accepted norm.

Also, I don’t think women were ever oppressed, men and women had to work in tandem to survive and get to where we are today.

(zmayday)

an "oppressed" group that has never had to work for their living jfl

(throwawaythisissosad)

> Tfw no shy cutie that secretly loves me.

we be making memes and stuff but this is how we really feel

TFW no cute GF that ask how our day was

(machinematrix)

shy cutie

Those don't exist. As soon as a Chad gets close, she turns into confident low-inhib Stacy. I knew a girl like this.

(St_BlackOps4Cel)

Lmao at this Becky cope, Chad doesn’t secretly like you, he’ll fuck you but then he won’t talk to you again, and why should he when he has hot Stacies that chase him around?

David G. Brown #sexist returnofkings.com

Do Not Try To Help A Woman Who Is A Victim Of “Domestic Violence”

David is a lifelong dissident and intellectual rebel. He despises political correctness, which replaces real, needy victims with narcissistic leftists out for a free meal. Though still a young man, he has watched society descend into its present morass with great sadness, combined with a determination to help make things better. He tweets when there's something worth tweeting here.

Helping women who claim to be victims of “domestic violence” is one of the best ways to suck up your own time, not to mention inject unnecessary emotions and drama into your life. Most of the time, your attempts to help will not be met with gratitude and, in fact, will frequently garner hostility from the person you are trying to “save.” Moreover, the target of your rescue mission generally doesn’t want to be saved anyway.

There is no need for anger or bitterness when you wash yourself of a woman claiming domestic violence, as hard as suppressing those emotions may be. Like someone dependent on drugs, an obese person, or another kind of addict, plenty of women are addicted to the rush of either a violent man (who is part of a small minority of men) or the thrill and attention of claiming to be the victim of a violent man who isn’t actually violent. Any logical, rational advice you give will invariably engender her opposition or inaction.

Particularly if a woman returns to her “abusive” boyfriend or husband after you have tried to save them, helping someone claiming domestic violence leads over and over again to unnecessary, sometimes aggressive or violent conflict with third parties. Even when this does not happen to the worst extent, you find yourself invested in an emotionally unstable woman, whether she causes the instability herself or not.

Most important of all, there is usually no evidence to support claims of domestic violence, bar the fickle testimonies of the couple. If you choose to help, you are almost certainly engaging in a wild goose chase with next to no merit. In today’s climate, asking a woman to do the dishes is probably considered domestic violence.

My experiences

Does the helping hand really help? Most times it doesn’t.

I learned fairly early on in adulthood that helping women “abused” by men is typically a fruitless exercise. For example, around the age of 19, I attempted to intervene in a situation where a female friend was being told, among other things, that she was worthless by her boyfriend at the time. At one stage, he even told her to kill herself. With zero sexual interest in the girl, I simply thought the guy’s behavior was wrong.

Yet, rather than thanking me for my assistance, my advice to this girl was greeted with histrionics and ingratitude. It also attracted a series of threats from her boyfriend, none of which eventuated. I had brought myself into heated verbal exchanges with this guy, without it having any impact whatsoever on the girl. If anything, the whole saga solidified her feelings for him. Aside from maybe interjecting in the “kill yourself” part, I had wasted my time completely. Nevertheless, it was a great lesson to learn so young.

I came to realize that women like this ex-friend are positively attracted to men like him. No amount of investment in time or energy would deter what were emotional longings for Mr. Demeaning. Second-hand experiences I had before and after this situation suddenly began to make sense.

#WhyIStayed and other similar bullshit

The internet exploded with questions about [Janay Rice] … why didn’t she leave [Ray Rice]? Why did she marry him? Why did she stay? I can’t speak for Janay Rice, but I can speak for Beverly Gooden. Why did I stay? … Leaving was a process, not an event. And sometimes it takes a while to navigate through the process. I believe in storytelling. I believe in the power of shared experience. I believe that we find strength in community. That is why I created this hashtag. I hope those tweeting using #WhyIStayed find a voice, find love, find compassion, and find hope.”

— #WhyIStayed “creator” Beverly Gooden promoting Beverly Gooden

Yes, because hope, rather than self-preservation, will save a woman who is a victim of actual domestic violence.

In addition to biological drives that impel women to stay with or seek out domineering sex partners, boyfriends, and husbands, good old feminist “storytelling” also motivates females in sticking by or returning to men that they claim hit them or, much more ambiguously, “mistreat” them. A whole cottage industry has developed to support the narrative that women can and should stay with supposedly abusive partners.

If we’re being brutally honest, #WhyIStayed and other feminist call signs keep swarms of feminist typists gainfully employed. They sustain the small rate of actual domestic violence so that these typists can continue to publish articles, despite them being highly exaggerated ones.

Of all the modern-day battles we could say are uphill because of perverse cultural conditioning, seeking to assist a woman who claims to be abused takes the cake. Realistically, what are your prospects of dissuading a woman from what is usually a self-determined, psychological, or biological course of action? If you say your chances are relatively high (whatever that means), is the expenditure of time and energy really worth it? The impact on your own life is likely to be much more than you anticipate.

An exception to the principle for sisters, female cousins, etc.

Doing more for family still makes sense, with limits.

There are some common sense exceptions to what I have been saying. If you or your family have more skin in the game and find one of your relatives in trouble, you obviously should try harder. Inasmuch as family units have been eviscerated in recent years, blood and similar ties still count for something nowadays.

Bear in mind, however, that many of the same limitations you have with female friends or acquaintances will apply in large part to your relatives. Maybe you will draw the biggest line when it comes to protecting your (future) daughter, but the rest of the time you are probably gnashing your teeth over sisters, cousins, or other female relatives who will just not listen to you (and who are in all likelihood gilding the lily about the level of mistreatment, too). If laying down the law doesn’t work the first or second time, cut your losses and move on for the time being.

There may come a point when you need to involve police for the very small minority of cases that truly warrant it. That is your call. And, of course, I am not advocating against helping women when you know at the gut level that they need it. What I am saying is that you need to avoid being a martyr in circumstances where being a martyr, literally or figuratively, is against your own interests.

Remember, most women either don’t want to be saved or are willing to cost you your state of mind and resources should you put yourself on the line for them.

Reddit_is_for_cucks #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Serious] I am pretty sure I’ll cheat on my loyal gf if I ever get one. Love doesn’t exist for me, I’ll fuck her over just like she would have fucked me over..

Fucking hate foids. They are all a ticking time bomb, only reason they haven’t cheated on you yet is because there hasn’t been a higher value make in her than you that has shown intrest in her.

Fucking parasites, once they ruin the first host they move onto the second.

Osten #racist stormfront.org

I'm going to tell you the reason why they want to destroy the white race:

Jealousy and fear.

Whites have always been the most beautiful, intelligent and hardworking people on the planet. We have invented everything that has made even a small impact on the development of human civilization. Our ladies especially are the most beautiful and have been the target for slavery for many millennia. We lead the world in art, music, philosophy, science and engineering. If we had continued to flourish we would have surely have lead the world into a totally new era of beauty and enlightenment, which is something that the dark, twisted and evil forces do not want to see.

Imagine if the world was without a single non white. It would be paradise everywhere and these "people" cannot stomach that thought so they have to destroy it with their violence and oppression and hate.

This is the basic reason why they push all of these complete lies on us, they forged a whole set of new and fake standards to hurt us and many of us, including my ex "friends" have bought it all.

Sparrow's Song #fundie incels.co

[It's Over] Fasting to death is better than roping or blowing your brains out.

Go back hundreds of thousands of years, when every femoid reproduced and only one out of seventeen men reproduced, when sixteen out of seventeen men either spent their lives hunting and gathering to feed cave chad, his harem, and his offspring while being bullied, intimidated, and killed in the heartless bloodbath of sexual competition and the only other option was to wander the earth alone until you die... These cavecels didn't have ropes, you could eat some poison berries or poison plant, you could force a venomous snake to bite you, maybe a few were smart enough to slash their wrists with obsidian but I doubt it, and if you knew where a high cliff was there was that option.

So how does a non chad man perform the art of suicide where there is no high cliffs? How does he set himself free if he lacks the knowledge of rope making or poison plants? What if he's not smart enough to slash his wrist? How do animals perform suicide? I remember when my dog was terminally ill and it knew that there was no pint in suffering a meaningless existence, it stopped eating and hid in under a table with it's face in the corner. We had to take it to the vet and shoot it up with the pink juice. Animals know that starvation can kill them. Starvation must therefore be, the primordial incel suicide method. It requires nothing, you don't need anything to do it.

If you choose to die by starvation alone, without dehydrating yourself, it can be painless and euphoric... it just takes awhile... If you start with less than ten percent body fat, you end it in a month. In India it's ritualized and often involves a slow gradual reduction of food over a period of several months to several years until they choose to stop eating completely and barely drink water, some abandoning water when they feel death is near to hasten the process.

In Hinduism this is called Prayopavesa:
image(From Wikipedia)
Prayopavesa (Sanskrit: प्रायोपवेशनम्, literally resolving to die through fasting) is a practice in Hinduism that denotes the suicide by fasting of a person, who has no desire or ambition left, and no responsibilities remaining in life . Committing Prayopavesa is bound by very strict regulations. Only a person who has no desire or ambition left, and no responsibilities remaining in life is entitled to perform it . The decision to do so must be publicly declared well in advance. Ancient lawmakers stipulated the conditions that allow Prayopavesa. They are one's inability to perform normal bodily purification, death appears imminent or the condition is so bad that life's pleasures are nil and the action is done under community regulation.

As you can see, prayopavesa is taking LDAR to the extreme, it is the ultimate LDAR. Fuck community regulation, everyone is bluepilled and cucked in current times.

In Jainism it is called Sallekhana:
image(From Wikipedia)
Sallekhana , also known as samlehna, santhara, samadhi-marana or sanyasana-marana, is a supplementary vow to the ethical code of conduct of Jainism. It is the religious practice of voluntarily fasting to death by gradually reducing the intake of food and liquids. It is viewed in Jainism as the thinning of human passions and the body, and another means of destroying rebirth-influencing karma by withdrawing all physical and mental activities. It is not considered as a suicide by Jain scholars because it is not an act of passion, nor does it deploy poisons or weapons. After the sallekhana vow, the ritual preparation and practice can extend into years.

Sallekhana (Sanskrit: Sallikhita) means to properly 'thin out', 'scour out' or 'slender' the passions and the body through gradually abstaining from food and drink. Sallekhana is divided into two components: Kashaya Sallekhana (slenderising of passions) or Abhayantra Sallekhana (internal slendering) and Kaya Sallekhana (slenderising the body) or Bahya Sallekhana(external slendering). According to Jain texts, Sallekhana leads to Ahimsa (non-violence or non-injury), as a person observing Sallekhana subjugates the passions, which are the root cause of Himsa (injury or violence).

It's also practiced in Buddhism as well:
image(2nd century B.C.E statue of a Neckbeard Buddha embracing death by LDAR)
image(Look at this chad with his shades on...)
(From Wikipedia)
Sokushinbutsu (即身仏) are a kind of Buddhist mummy. The term refers to the practice of Buddhist monks observing asceticism to the point of death and entering mummification while alive.[1]They are seen in a number of Buddhist countries, but the Japanese term "sokushinbutsu" is generally used. It is believed that many hundreds of monks tried, but only 24 such mummifications have been discovered to date. There is a common suggestion that Shingon school founder Kukai brought this practice from Tang China as part of secret tantric practices he learned, and that were later lost in China. According to Paul Williams, the Sokushinbutsu ascetic practices of Shugendō were likely inspired by Kūkai – the founder of Shingon Buddhism, who ended his life by reducing and then stopping intake of food and water, while continuing to meditate and chant Buddhist mantras. Ascetic self-mummification practices are also recorded in China, but are associated with the Ch'an(Zen Buddhism) tradition there.

In medieval Japan, this tradition developed a process for Sokushinbutsu, which a monk completed over about 3,000 days to ten years. It involved a strict diet called mokujikigyo (literally, "eating a tree"). The diet abstained from any cereals, and relied on pine needles, resins and seeds found in the mountains, which would eliminate all fat in the body. Increasing rates of fasting and meditation would lead to starvation. The monks would slowly reduce then stop liquid intake, thus dehydrating the body and shrinking all organs. The monks would die in a state of jhana (meditation) while chanting the nenbutsu (a mantra about Buddha), and their body would become naturally preserved as a mummy with skin and teeth intact without decay and without the need of any artificial preservatives.

It was discussed by Hegesias of Cyrene:
image(From Wikipedia)
Hegesias (Greek: Ἡγησίας; fl. 290 BC) of Cyrene was a Cyrenaic philosopher, the Cyrenaics forming one of the earliest Socratic schools of philosophy. He argued that happiness is impossible to achieve, and that the goal of life was the avoidance of pain and sorrow. Conventional values such as wealth, poverty, freedom, and slavery are all indifferent and produce no more pleasure than pain. Cicero claims that Hegesias wrote a book called Death by Starvation, which persuaded so many people that death is more desirable than life that Hegesias was banned from teaching in Alexandria. It has been thought by some that Hegesias was influenced by Buddhist teachings.

Hegesias followed Aristippus in considering pleasure as the goal of life; but, the view which he took of human life was more pessimistic. Happiness, he said, could not be the goal of life, because it is not attainable, and therefore concluded that the wise person's only goal should be to become free from pain and sorrow. Since, too, every person is self-sufficient, all external goods were rejected as not being true sources of pleasure.

Complete happiness cannot possibly exist; for that the body is full of many sensations, and that the mind sympathizes with the body, and is troubled when that is troubled, and also that fortune prevents many things which we cherished in anticipation; so that for all these reasons, perfect happiness eludes our grasp. Moreover, that both life and death are desirable. They also say that there is nothing naturally pleasant or unpleasant, but that owing to want, or rarity, or satiety, some people are pleased and some vexed; and that wealth and poverty have no influence at all on pleasure, for that rich people are not affected by pleasure in a different manner from poor people. In the same way they say that slavery and freedom are things indifferent, if measured by the standard of pleasure, and nobility and baseness of birth, and glory and infamy. They add that, for the foolish person it is expedient to live, but to the wise person it is a matter of indifference; and that the wise person will do everything for his own sake; for that he will not consider any one else of equal importance with himself; and he will see that if he were to obtain ever such great advantages from any one else, they would not be equal to what he could himself bestow.

Hence the sage ought to regard nothing but himself; action is quite indifferent; and if action, so also is life, which, therefore, is in no way more desirable than death.

The wise person would not be so much absorbed in the pursuit of what is good, as in the attempt to avoid what is bad, considering the chief good to be living free from all trouble and pain: and that this end was attained best by those who looked upon the efficient causes of pleasure as indifferent.

None of this, however, is as strong as the testimony of Cicero, who claims that Hegesias wrote a book called Death by Starvation (Greek: ἀποκαρτερῶν), in which a man who has resolved to starve himself is introduced as representing to his friends that death is actually more to be desired than life, and that the gloomy descriptions of human misery which this work contained were so overpowering that they inspired many people to kill themselves, in consequence of which the author received the surname of Death-persuader (Peisithanatos). This book was published at Alexandria, where he was, in consequence, forbidden to teach by king Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285-246 BC).

imageSeriously, I can't think of a more badass way to go. All these dudes in ancient times were black pilled as fuck.
image

Osten #racist stormfront.org

To all the members of this forum: Thank you!!!! I have learnt so much about the dark hands behind the curtain of manipulation that is plaguing America today. I have never felt so liberated than when I realized that Jews are the real cause of all the terrible experiences that have happened to me through my modelling career.

I now truly understand why, even though white women are undeniably the most beautiful humans aesthetically (tho whether other races can be properly classified as human is like open to discussion imo), we are being pushed out of magazines and ads at an alarming rate. It is because the Jewish propaganda machine wants to push their multicult mentality on us by hailing these mongrels as "edgy" and "hip". But most importantly, Jews want to control the males of our population through one big thing: SEX.

Our sex obsessed culture is what is really bringing us down, pushed by the Jewish media machine. This machine exploits the basic male desire to have sex. Once white men accept mongrel or non white women as "sexy", then they become so much more easy to manipulate because you can market anything or any stupid idea to them through this method.

But I wanna tell every white man who visits this board:

THIS 'BEAUTY' IS FAKE!!

Having worked in the fashion industry for quite a few years let me tell you the truth: White women are the only ones who don't need a ton of airbrushing and make up to look beautiful in fashion shoots. Non whites and mixed women are always buried under a mountain of powder and foundation to - guess what? Look WHITER. That's right. Underneath white liberal male's supposed hots for "ethnic" women, still lies the REAL desire for WHITE WOMEN. But this desire is being warped and twisted by JEWS to make you think that this beauty is something non-whites share. Well guess what, it's NOT.

If you are still a real white man, then own up to yourself that you actually LOVE WHITE WOMEN. You want to breed with us. You want to preserve and love us. You want to make America great and white again.

Feel free to argue with me, I'm up for it cos I've done it a million times with my ex 'friends', liberal douchebags.

cledun #racist #wingnut gameruprising.to

Currently we are suffering under a brutal regime of Soviet-style Judeo-Negro tyranny.

*If the mob comes for you, the police will stand down, until you start defending yourself, then they will shoot rubber bullets at you.

*If blacks come to destroy everything you've spent your life building for your family, you will be condemned for valuing property more than the right of "people" to steal and destroy it.

*If you are attacked by a black and defend yourself, you will be given 400 years in prison.

*If you call a black man a nigger and he kills you, he will not be charged with anything.

*Black criminals will be allowed to wantonly escape from police, but if you call the police on a black criminal who is menacing you or committing some other act of aggression, you will be charged with thought crimes.

Some other things you can expect to see coming:

*They will take the children of racists and place them under foster care in specifically chosen black homes.

*It will be a hate crime for white women to refuse sex with a black man.

*There will be a social credit system for white people based on how much money they give to black people and causes.

*Every time a black demand is met, they will turn around and call the way it was met racist, and make new demands.

*The tracking/microchip system they implement purportedly to combat COVID will be used to identify and mark racists so that they can be excluded from the right to buy and sell, run for office, or even get a fair redress of grievances before the court.

*Justice will be ad hoc and summary, the courts will be stacked with Jews, Blacks and their soulless white lackeys. If you go into court, the only hope of maybe escaping without being life ruined will be massive bribes.

*I wont be surprised if a jury trial will be declared a relic of white supremacy, and all decisions will be made in a closed court by judges.

*Like accusations of witchcraft in ye olde times, blacks will invent claims of racism specifically in order to have white people they dislike killed. "Racists" will be murdered this way and the murderer will be celebrated as a hero

More than a decade ago I predicted an Islamic uprising to establish a caliphate, a camp of the saints flood into Europe, and an anarchic race war in America by 2025, and it has all come to pass ahead of schedule. I wish I could encounter and gloat to all the ex-friends who accused me of being a gullible bigot who believed everything he read online (very ironic if you think about it). Most of the predictions I make in this post might have seemed extreme not long ago, but save them to a txt file and look them over again in 2030. Hopefully I am way off the mark, but if trends continue....

JC_Hinson #fundie identitydixie.com

[From "What is Southern Fascism?"]

Southern Fascism is showing up with your legally armed and regulated militia to protest the proposed building of a mosque in your town, succeeding in shutting the muslim colonizers down, and later that night enjoying your victory around a bonfire. Southern Fascism is walking into an invader owned store just to tell them to get the hell out of your state, and then driving the extra miles to support your fellow White man, thanking him for his service each and every time you frequent his business. Southern Fascism is denying the charities for Haiti and North Africa, in order to donate to your own folk when they need a helping hand.

Southern Fascism is stonewalling the pompous blacks in the gym, and seconds later shaking a White elder’s hand, smiling warmly and always referring to him as, “Sir.” Southern Fascism is lifting heavy in the morning and pickin’ and grinnin’ at night. Southern Fascism is walking through a crowd of invaders in a parking lot, forcing them out of your way, and then stopping to help an older White lady load groceries into her sedan. Southern Fascism is holding the door for your own, and only your own.

Southern Fascism is pissing on Abraham Lincoln’s grave, and then defending the Robert E. Lee statue from being torn down. Southern Fascism is shooting holes in the, “I’m with Her” signs, driving across town, and shooting holes in the Trump signs too.

Southern Fascism is pulling into the largest White Nationalist meeting held in 15 years, riding in a giant White truck proclaiming, “UNRECONSTRUCTED” in large White letters on the back window, the bed filled with proud White Southerners, the Stars & Bars flying high.

Southern Fascism is laughing at the mexican walking down the side of the road, and then pulling right over to tow your fellow White man out of that damn Georgia red. Southern Fascism is shaming wiggers and never embracing an alien, no matter how, “based” they look in their “Rebel” hat.

Southern Fascism is waking up early to wet a line, but arriving promptly at 11:00 a.m. to take your Granny for brunch at her favorite buffet. Southern Fascism is baked chicken and hot sauce, green beans and yams, NO potato salad, NO cobbler. Southern Fascism is iced tea, NO sugar.

Southern Fascism is naming the JEW, and calling the state of Israel what they are: a den of vipers. Southern Fascism is going to a church where your scholarly and righteous pastor preaches both sides of God’s true nature, and does so with a loaded 9mm under his vest. Southern Fascism is disciplining your children when they err, and blessing them when they make you proud.

Southern Fascism is correctly judging when a dog must be put down and not hesitating to do so, but weeping the loss of a loyal friend later. Southern Fascism is making “Jack Hinson did nothing wrong” memes and always referring to the “War of Northern Aggression” by this only acceptable title.

Southern Fascism is courteously explaining exactly what you love and support, and everything you stand for, with NO compromise and NO apology. Southern Fascism is joining the Sons of Confederate Veterans and refusing to disrespect your forefathers that bled for their people and this land by flying that damn federal flag over their graves.

Southern Fascism is being the only man to loudly protest White dispossession in your city council meeting, while everyone else insists upon sitting there “politely.” Southern Fascism is waiting patiently when arguing with an urbanite, only to better prove them wrong when they falter. Southern Fascism is telling your woman what to do and how to do it, and maybe giving her some loving later, if it’s not hunting season.

Southern Fascism is loving your people more than any other earthly possession. Southern Fascism is the unrelenting preservation of our sacred heritage and rich culture. Southern Fascism is respecting the people that brought us here, and the men that fight for it now. Ultimately, Southern Fascism is us; one united brotherhood, the heirs of a pioneered inheritance, and the mentors of the future South.

Alia_Harkonnen #sexist reddit.com

Confidence is a word females use to condition normies to being cucks

1. Women endlessly repeat that they love confident men - most men aren't really sure what that means but it seems to mean Chad

2. "No its not the looks part, it's the confidence" - women repeat. Normies start working hard on the mission to obtain this confidence and become Chads

3. Normies write books on the topic, long posts on the topic, whole movements exist to help men obtain confidence - if they happen to make money on it, they are more successful with women so someone must be onto something

4. Biggest enemy of confidence is insecurity and self doubt, avoid it at all cost - women start defining behaviors as insecure

5. If you're self assured and confident you trust your partner and your relationship. You also don't need your partner to make you happy or to make you feel loved, this comes from within

6. You don't have a problem with your partner having vast sexual history and well used cunt. You're not threatened by her male friends, ex boyfriends, men she meets and flirts with, crushes, coworkers etc. - Chad isn't threatened by her beta orbiters, so why would a beta provider be, right? If you think she'd cheat on you just because she has exposure than you're insecure and it's a turn off and she will cheat on you.

7. If you are really secure in yourself and your relationship, why not open it up? After all, it's just sex. Chad has a gf anyway he just wants to fuck yours, so be self assured enough and let her have her fun.

8. What's more confident than a man who can raise another man's kids?

9. Being slightly gay and pretending to totally love your girlfriends Chad crushes is also a great display of confidence

10. Bluepilled Normie has evolved into a Supremely Confident Male - he has a wife he never fucks, is raising her kids who aren't his kids, and while she's fucking Chad he is positing on reddit about his confidence and talking about male celebrities he is comfortable with calling attractive

11. Normie castrates himself to fully free himself of any dick imposed insecurities, donates all his material possessions to Stacy, and let's Chad fuck him to death while screaming "I'm really cool with all this" through tears

Fuck your confidence whores.

Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

God has no use for fake. Honesty is what He’s after, and honesty is what He wants from you in every stage of the journey. Hating His guts, thinking He’s a monster, deciding He is cruel—these are all very valid places to be. It’s in these pit holes of pain and anger that we really let God have it with both barrels: hurling accusations at Him and throwing out all the pretty platitudes we clung to before. We join Job in saying that the way God runs His game down here isn’t right or fair. He blesses those who do evil while He kicks His loyal friends in the face. He is an Ogre with unstoppable power who gets off on tormenting those who can’t fight back. No, we aren’t going to love that. We can’t. God has wired us to find such a dark image of Him utterly repulsive. We can’t trust or love a God who we honestly don’t believe is good. Sure, we can obey Him out of fear of being punished, but that certainly is a lousy way to live. We weren’t designed to thrive in a state of cowering fear. For us, everything is anchored on confidence in God’s goodness—our peace, our hope, our sense of purpose in life. Once we lose that, we lose everything, and in certain stages of refinement, confidence in God’s goodness is the thing that He rips away from us.

Now we get to that ten dollar question: WHY?! What is the point in God totally destroying our confidence in Him? Why does He morph into some terrifying Monster? Why does He go into death silence mode and refuse to utter one peep of encouragement to us? As usual, the answer is nonsensical: God destroys our trust in Him in order to make it stronger.

Theweirdestdom #fundie yandere.freeforums.net

Hello...I recently discovered that the maniacal and insane love I've been searching for all of my life has an incarnation in Yandere. Since I can remember, I've always been plagued by a love far more intense than that of people around me...in the fourth grade, I stalked my crush to her home so I could put a Valentine in her mailbox. My first girlfriend was very attractive and many of my so-called friends fell in love with her, and it made me come face to face with the fact that I wanted to give her the gift of their eyes so she could make sure they were never looking at her again. And after that I realized that I was never going to be able to really love like other people. Whenever people would talk about "psycho girlfriend behavior", I'd just get all fluttery in my heart, thinking of how much I'd love the feeling of pride when my girl goes through my phone looking for texts to other women and finds none, because I love her so much I'd never kiss anyone else. When I watched my friend's ex girlfriend kick open the door and immediately attack his new girlfriend, it made me think she was so hot and that my friend was so stupid for leaving her, despite that everyone else was saying what a good choice it was to dump her. I'm just
hoping that by coming here and talking about it, that somehow, magically, a beautiful girl will appear with photos of me for the past three days, a plan to track me if I run, and a cake baked especially for me with some of her blood in the batter to make sure she gets part of herself closer to my heart. ^_^

Vital Stats - 30 years old, Male, Bible Belt-living, 6'2 220lbs, degrees in English and History, highly politically and philosophically active, atheist, and liberal.

I don't know, because I don't think she counts as a true Yandere, but I love Tomoko Kuroki from Watamote. I feel like she never actually finds love, but that if she did she'd become yandere with a swiftness heretofore reserved for photons. She's also the closest fictional equalivent to my own personality. Here on the internet, I'm all typetypetype, but in real life I'm reserved, quiet, and get very nervous when talking to people...especially girls I think ae pretty...


[ Is magic really necessary? Also, what do you think would happen then? ]

Well in my fantasy she's pretty, and nice, and intelligent enough to have tracked me despite that I put a lot of effort and what I hope is intelligent thought into covering my tracks and keeping myself untraceable, and she's, well, yandere. Honestly I eat the cake and we fall madly in love and live happily ever after, helping each other hide the evidence. I don't want to resist, I don't want to upset her, I want to be her perfect love and to make sure she always smiles, and if anyone gets in the way of that I might just give her their pretty teeth.

But if she ends up feeling like she needs to kill me, then I...I just hope she accepts my apology and believes that I really do love her before she does. But I'd only want her to kill me from love; I like yandere, and have no love for yangire.

[ Am I reading this right that you wouldn't mind being killed from love? ]

It's not so much that I wouldn't mind it...I would, I'd be very sad, but it'd be because my time with her was over. As long as she promised never to move on and to spend the rest of her life mourning me, I don't know...I know I'd kick and scream while it was happening, but the notion seems so romantic to me...

My own yandere-ness tends to be protective, though...I could never kill my love no matter how horrible she was.

theweirdestdom #fundie yandere.freeforums.net

Since I can remember, I've always been plagued by a love far more intense than that of people around me...in the fourth grade, I stalked my crush to her home so I could put a Valentine in her mailbox. My first girlfriend was very attractive and many of my so-called friends fell in love with her, and it made me come face to face with the fact that I wanted to give her the gift of their eyes so she could make sure they were never looking at her again. And after that I realized that I was never going to be able to really love like other people. Whenever people would talk about "psycho girlfriend behavior", I'd just get all fluttery in my heart, thinking of how much I'd love the feeling of pride when my girl goes through my phone looking for texts to other women and finds none, because I love her so much I'd never kiss anyone else. When I watched my friend's ex girlfriend kick open the door and immediately attack his new girlfriend, it made me think she was so hot and that my friend was so stupid for leaving her, despite that everyone else was saying what a good choice it was to dump her. I'm just hoping that by coming here and talking about it, that somehow, magically, a beautiful girl will appear with photos of me for the past three days, a plan to track me if I run, and a cake baked especially for me with some of her blood in the batter to make sure she gets part of herself closer to my heart. ^_^ Vital Stats - 30 years old, Male, Bible Belt-living, 6'2 220lbs, degrees in English and History, highly politically and philosophically active, atheist, and liberal.

David J. Stewart #fundie google.com.au

Everything that I own, do, or am belongs to God. When I sin, the Lord says, “That's on me, I paid for that!” (1st John 2:1-2). This is why we read in Matthew 25:40, “And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.” Jesus considers any good or bad, done for or against a child of God, as if it were done unto Him personally. What a loyal Savior! What a precious friend that sticketh closer than a brother! Ah, listen my friend, I highly recommend that you treat Christians nicely.

And whatever you do, don't ever hurt a child of God. Contrary to popular belief, the following Scripture applies primarily to Christians, not children. Matthew 18:6, “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Not all children believe in Christ, and all young children have not yet reached the age of enlightenment (i.e., old enough to understand receiving or rejecting Christ as Savior). To BELIEVE on Christ, a child must be old enough to understand the concept of sin against God, and that Christ died on the cross for their sins, and raised up bodily three days later. Obviously, this Scripture is referring to Christians. It would be silly to claim that God cares about saved children more than unsaved children, which is exactly what you would be claiming if you said that this passage refers to children. Granted, there is no doubt that children are precious to God, and anyone who harms an innocent child will be fully held accountable by God on judgment day!!!

river #fundie proudly-pro-choice.tumblr.com

[ Is it acceptable that, I as a black woman am allowed to be afraid of white people because my white ex boyfriend abused me sexually, physically and mentally? ]

abuse mention tw, sexual abuse mention tw,
Most definitely and absolutely.
So, I always look at it this way:
Marginalized people (which you as a black woman most definitely are) have every single right to be afraid of/hate etc. their oppressors. Both because let’s be honest, it’s not like the oppressing groups are known for treating marginalized people well, but also because of power imbalances.
When a black trans woman (not saying that you are, just to make an example) is afraid of a white cis dude, her fear is not unfounded, because even if he’s the nicest person in the world, he has the power to do to her whatever he likes, and the law, and society will more than likely be on his side.
When a white cis dude is scared of a black woman, the power imbalance works for him, not against. Even if the white cis dude in question has a bad history, at the end of the day he’s safe. Being white, he’s in the position of power, being a man, his power is increased. His fear is based off (maybe) personal experience, racism, and misogyny. The black woman’s fear is based off a shitty society full of misogyny and racism, and a need for safety.
To look at things in another light:
When a white person is afraid of a poc, they are perpetuating those stereotypes, which lead to violence against poc, and general discrimination against poc. When poc are afraid of white people, there are no negative repercussions for said white people. White people aren’t loosing jobs because they’re viewed as “violent”. White people are being stopped by cops, because it’s just assumed that they’re selling drugs. White people aren’t being required to prove that they’re legal citizens because they don’t “look american.” In this way, poc disliking/fearing etc. white people, is not, and can not be the same. This is also why “reverse racism” isn’t a thing. This logic is also true for woman, trans people, and so on.
Poc have every right to be afraid, uncomfortable around, dislike, etc. white people (even if there’s no abuse history present, although that only makes it more understandable). To go even further, if poc decide they don’t want any white friends, or people to be involved in their personal life, cool. There’s nothing wrong with that. (In the same vein, if trans people decide they only want trans people in their life, there’s nothing wrong with that. If disabled people decide they only want disabled people in their life, there’s nothing wrong with that, and so on.)
You don’t owe anyone anything. You don’t need to like white people, you don’t need to want to be around white people, and that doesn’t make you a bad person. The most important thing is your comfort, safety, and well being.
Also, I hope you’re okay now! If you ever need to talk, I’m here! And please know that your experiences are completely valid, and that your emotions/feelings on the matter, and what you’ve been through are also completely and entirely valid. I know there’s a lot of “love your oppressor or you’re just as bad uwu” stuff out there, but please know that that is not true. That message is honestly so toxic, and I really hate how common it is.
I don’t know if this is something you’re looking for more information on, and you may already follow them, but I’ve heard really good things about the blog ablackwomansurvivingrape-I don’t follow it since I’m neither black, nor a woman, but I’ve heard good things about it as a blog, so you may want to check them out, if you’re ever looking for specific resources in regards to healing from the things you’ve been through.
Survivor-surviving is another really good one, that handles abuse in general (although it isn’t gender or race specific) and has a ton of useful information.
I hope this finds you well, and that you’re okay!

[ Im the anon who has a friend who fears black girls because of prior abuse/bullying. I dont think she is a bad person at all. She is just damaged and scared. She doesn 't really hate black girls. She just scared of them because she had nothing but bad expieriences with them. She has a hard time trusting people and making friends because bullies spread horrible rumours about her. She is a very nice person.. ]


racism tw, anti-black racism tw, abuse mention tw, bullying mention tw

Alright, so I’m just going to be honest with you.
If you’re mean to/mistrusting/mistreating/afraid of/exotificing/simplifying etc. a marginalized group of people (especially black women, and black trans women) you are not a good person. This is racism at minimum, and it’s a problem.
Based off the way this ask is phrased I’m assuming you are not in fact a black girl. So your friend is probably super cool to you. But is she super cool to her black woman doctor? To her black lady barista? To the black girl that asks to sit next to her on the bus? Because I suspect they might have a different answer then you.
And frankly, being abused, and being bullied is not an excuse. It’s awful that she was bullied-I’m not denying that. Bullying is horrific, and it has lasting effects and I’m sorry she went through with that. However, that is no excuse for racism. That does not make racism, or this kind of treatment of black women okay. And trying to justify it as such is super gross.

Michael G. Mickey #fundie rapturealert.blogspot.com

Philadelphia may be called "the city of brotherly love" for more than one reason - that reason being that brother-on-brother love is so honored that those who don't approve of it may be punished, even if they are trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent in every other manner.

That's right, former Boy Scouts. Philadelphia is so desperate to be homosexual-friendly it is punishing the Boy Scouts of America![snip}

When cities start beating up on Boy Scouts, the end of the Age of Grace surely must be drawing near.

Incelebrategoodtimes #sexist reddit.com

try this pickup line currycels

image

Hi. As a woman who’s constantly trying to understand the incel mindset, why isn’t the Indian man going for Indian women? Why Caucasian women? Thanks.

Because the curry whores are becoming just like the asian whores, only going for white chad. This leaves currycels and ricecels with no one left

Okay, but what about Indian/Asian women who aren’t whores?

Non existant. We live in a society with white people everywhere. These women are always going to choose the white man instead of their own race. The only reason you see asians with asians or indians with indians is because they were unable to get a white man because most white men are able to get other white women. The ones who don't resort to brown or asian girls, leaving almost no white incels. Whitecel is volcel unless you're gigamanlet, literally deformed, or gigamentalcel. I see sub5'8 fat neckbeard white men with asian foids all the time. A lot of white guys I know also claim they get attention from these asian or curry foids a lot. Now, if these women would choose a lower tier white guy rather than a higher tier brown or asian dude, where does that leave us, the lower tier ethnics? Inceldom

Okay, so does that mean that inceldom is a product of American society? I ask because although I’m fat, I have a few Indian female friends (I live in the UK) who have only dated/married Indian men. One of my Indian friends is fairly attractive (I’d rate her 7/10) and she’s dating a short, balding guy. He’s Indian. She loves him because he’s awesome to her. Another friend is Caucasian actually, she married her Indian boyfriend last year. He’s not ugly but not spectacularly attractive either. Balding a bit and shorter than she is, I’d rate him 6/10 and her 8/10. They went to uni together and have similar incomes. So forgive me if I’m not quite seeing your point here. And thanks for responding.

As debunked on this sub many times, exceptions are not the rule. "I've seen -x happen irl therefore x is not a real problem". Statistics show that Indian and Asian men are among the lowest rated in attractiveness. Most of these issues stem from the ideals of the west being enforced onto ethnics. The whole "White Beauty"ideal and skin whitening craze among asians and indians contributes to this problem. Indian men are just as guilty of this. They chase white women a lot, especially the FOBs. The only difference is they usually aren't able to get with them, while the Indian women are able to (or at least have a higher chance to because they are women and there are no shortages of desperate white men). Combine this with hypergamous western society, and as a result you get this. Want proof? Go to r/uwaterloo. This is a subreddit for a Canadian university which is overwhelmingly Asian. Every other thread is someone complaining about how they are miserable and lonely

Chad Greene #transphobia thefederalist.com

Trans people are dying!” chanted a group of transgender protesters interrupting Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg during one of many CNN discussions on LGBT issues. Beto O’Rouke and Don Lemon were greeted by a passionate trans activist named Blossom Brown, who shouted, “Black trans woman are being killed in this country, and you have erased trans women for the last time.”
Kamala Harris responded compassionately to an audience member who interrupted her forum by shouting, “How do we get those men to stop killing us? How do we get those men to stop killing trans women of color? We are hunted. Systematically hunted. How can they do that?”

In response to these accusations, Buttigieg calmly assured the audience, “I would like to believe everyone here is committed to ending that epidemic.” Harris responded to the question of how she would address violence against transgender people by saying, “There has to be serious consequence and accountability when it happens.”
Sen. Cory Booker took the issue a step further when addressing more widespread accusations of anti-LGBT violence, referring to it as a national emergency and saying, “We live in a country where we still see regular, everyday violence and intimidation and bullying against Americans because of who they are.” He proposed an “Office of Hate Crimes and White Supremacy” to handle the issue.
The media alarm bells have been resonating on this topic for quite a while, and as each year passes, the ritual listing of transgender murder victims has become a staple of LGBT reporting. In fact, it is impossible to find any article detailing a particular murder without a paragraph or two devoted to discussing the “epidemic” of violence against transgender males dressing as females, specifically of color. It is clearly embedded in our collective consciousness despite the right’s efforts to shed light onto the issue with far more accurate and rational reporting.
Does the Data Show an ‘Epidemic’ of Hate?
I have spent much writing discussing how these stories are exploited and manipulated to create an impression of violence and hatred that rarely reflects reality. As such, I have become familiar with nearly all of the cases so often repeated, but I realized it was time to collect them together and analyze them as a whole.

The Human Rights Campaign has organized this information in packets starting in 2015 through the present. Using these resources, I independently researched each case to the best of my ability with the available information. The HRC reports can be found here: 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019.
In the HRC’s 2019 ongoing information page, the organization made this important statement:
Some of these cases involve clear anti-transgender bias. In others, the victim’s transgender status may have put them at risk in other ways, such as forcing them into unemployment, poverty, homelessness and/or survival sex work.
After years of simply declaring “hate” to be the core motivation, this comes as a refreshing admission of the realities surrounding these murders. However, the LGBT left’s bias toward victimhood still pushes them to place blame where no feasible solution could be found to resolve it.
……..

We Need Honesty About Crimes Against Trans People
Although LGBT advocates and media insist these cases do not represent a true picture of violence, as often the victim is identified as a different sex by the police until family or friends correct reports, we still have no evidence of a pattern or “epidemic” of violence. It is certainly false that trans women are being “systematically hunted” or that black trans women are specifically targeted.
What we do know from all available resources is that the violence these individuals experience occurs to a very broad range of people with diverse backgrounds and identities. It is clearly more an issue of high-risk environments than identity-based discrimination.
Another important element to recognize is that regardless of gender identity, local, state, and federal authorities take each case very seriously, and more than half of reported crimes have resolved in sentencing. No one is looking the other way or tolerating this violence, and certainly not because the victims are transgender.
The truth is there is very little our government or society could do to reduce these incidents. They result from cultural influences, dangerous environments, and high-risk engagements. The most powerful effects the left, LGBT advocacy and media, and Democratic leaders could have in protecting transgender people would be to tell the truth about prostitution, drugs, risky sex practices, and domestic violence. Continuing the narrative of fighting hatred and bigotry will do nothing more than win popularity points; it won’t save lives.

freedomwarrior #fundie theresistancemanifesto.com

ONE OF MY FIANCE'S EX'S (HE IS VERY FAMOUS AND DEFINITELY A SATANIST) HIRED A TEAM OF WARLOCKS TO BREAK US UP, INCLUDING A COMPUTER EXPERT AND A PERSON WITH THE GIFT OF TELEPATHY(THE HELPER)

THEY INVESTIGATED MY WHOLE LIFE TO THE FINEST DETAIL,EVEN THINGS ONLY MYSELF KNOW. IT WAS CLEAR SATAN WANTS ME DEAD AND HE WAS DESPERATE. I WAS TOLD THE AMOUNT OF SATANISTS THAT CAME MY WAY ARE ONLY SEEN IN THE OCCULT WORLD. THEY EVEN HAD WATCHERS ON US!

A GIRL WHOM I TOOK FOR A DATE TO A FUNCTION TRIED TO KILL ME BY PUTTING POISON IN MY DRINK AND LATER THAT NIGHT I FELL ASLEEP BEHIND THE WHEEL (PRAISE JESUS I SURVIVED).

FEW YEARS LATER:
I WAS MARRIED TO A WOMAN CASTING SPELLS ON MY DOG AND ME.
PUTTING POTIONS IN MY FOOD (GOATS BLOOD). I WAS VERY SICK WHEN SHE LEFT ME!

JUST AFTER SHE LEFT(AND JUST GETTING MY LIFE BACK) I WAS INVOLVED WITH 4 HIGH PRIESTESS' IN TOTAL.

ALL CURSED ME AND PUT SPELLS ON ME.
ONE TRIED TO GET PREGNANT AND EVEN DRANK MY SPERM.
ONE TRIED TO INJECT ME WITH THE AIDS VIRUS (THE HOLY SPIRIT WOKE ME UP)
SHE WANTED TO CUT MY PRIVATES OFF.

Scott Lively #fundie scottlively.net

As expected, SCOTUS today declared a constitutional right to “gay marriage” by judicial fiat. I haven’t read the ruling and may not ever do so since it really doesn’t matter what its reasoning is. The decision is illegitimate on its face because Justices Ginsberg and Kagan were disqualified from voting under the fundamental rules of judicial ethics because they each performed same sex “weddings” during the period of deliberations when the parties were legally entitled to impartiality by the jurists.

In response to the ruling, Mr. Obama called it an example of “justice that arrives like a thunderbolt.” That phrase turns logic and morality on its head as it relates to official government endorsement of sexual perversion. But I suspect it will eventually, perhaps very soon, be recognized in retrospect as an unwitting prophecy about God’s punishment on America for what she has just done.

###

12:30pm I just received an email from my ex-‘gay’ friend Greg Quinlan informing me that today’s “gay marriage” ruling happens to fall on the anniversary of the fall of Jerusalem and the Kingdom of Judah in 586BC to Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzer: the ninth day of the fourth month of the Hebrew calendar.

“Coincidentally,” in our daily chapter by chapter Bible study at Holy Grounds Coffee House that we began in Genesis more than two years ago, we arrived today at Jeremiah 39, which reads in verse 2: 2And on the ninth day of the fourth month of Zedekiah’s eleventh year, the city wall was broken through.

Amazing.

GunBan #fundie dailyrecord.co.uk

(re: Raoul Moat standoff with police in north of England)

The real trigger to these sad costly events is the behaviour by his mother and the provoking games from the ex girl friend who no doubt has been be using his kids as a meal ticket .

Its a getting a bit tiring with all this 'hell hath no fury like a womans scorn' rubbish. The Spice Girls mentality is really just a gimmic ladies. No one cares a jot 'what you really really want' other than what you can scrounge off the tax payer through having kids with delinquents.

A trip to Taliban country for a few irresponsible woman is in order. Maybe show you what side your bread's buttered and give the kids a chance of a mother that can behave.

Gilad Atzmon #conspiracy gilad.co.uk

If this is what Corbyn’s Labour is, who needs Tories?

On 5 May 2016, Londoners will select their next mayor. Their choice is between Zac Goldsmith, a Jewish millionaire married to a Rothschild and Sadiq Khan, a spinelessSabbos Goy.

The Jewish Chronicle (JC) revealed yesterday that Mr. Sadiq Khan who in the past made repeated calls on ministers to impose sanctions on Israel, has finally changed his spots. In an obvious attempt to appease Britain’s Jews, Khan told the JC that after studying the evidence he now believes that: “the evidence clearly shows that boycott, sanctions and divestment against Israel do not help us achieve peace – we must not turn our face against Israel.”

I’ve been reporting on Jeremy Corbyn’s shameless capitulation to the Jewish Lobby. The long time campaigner for Palestine has, in just a few weeks, been reduced into a sad Zionist puppet whose position on Israel has descended into a copy of a Likud pamphlet.

Labour’s shameless groveling knows no end. We learn this morning that Corbyn’s party has expelled Gerry Downing, a far left activist whose views on Zionism don’t fit with the new kosher party line.

Downing, a marginal Trotskyite, wrote in his blog that Isis is “not agreeing with what they were doing," adding: "I don't support the politics of Isis, they are vile barbarians. But I don't support American imperialist bombing either.”

Apparently opposing American imperial wars is now unacceptable within the Labour ranks.

Mr. Downing, a former bus driver and member of the tiny Socialist Fight group, said on his Twitter page that his ambition is "to end capitalism on the planet by socialist revolution.” Slightly delusional perhaps, but I remember that until two months ago this ideal was shared by Corbyn. Not anymore, I guess by now Corbyn has even mastered the national anthem, I mean the Hatikvah.

The JC was kind enough to provide us with the list of crimes that led to Downing’s eviction: in 2014 Downing referred to “Hamas heroism,” he appeared to have questioned aspects of the Holocaust and claimed prominent historian Ian Kershaw had a “Zionist minder.” In addition, his Socialist Fight group’s website has published articles by other authors including one demanding that “Marxists must address the Jewish Question” and another referring to a “world Jewish-Zionist Bourgeoisie.”

The UK Jewish Lobby spokesperson told the JC: “If the comments attributed to Gerry Downing about Jews are genuine, he is an obnoxious antisemite who should not be accepted in any modern political movement.”

Labour MP John Woodcock, ex-Labour Friends of Israel chair, wrote to Mr. Corbyn urging him to expel Mr. Downing. Mr. Woodcock said the activist’s views were “sickening and bring our party into disrepute.”

Again, Corbyn quickly surrendered. A Labour spokeswoman said: “following further evidence that has come to light, Gerry Downing has now been excluded from the Labour Party by the NEC panel.”

If this is what Corbyn’s Labour is all about, we really don’t need Tories.

Crystal Dixon #fundie advocate.com

Crystal Dixon, who was fired from her job at the University of Toledo in 2008 for writing a newspaper column that argued being gay is a choice and not a matter of civil rights, has been hired to lead a county human rights department in Michigan.

In 2008, Dixon lost her university job as associate vice president for human resources over a column she wrote in the Toledo Free Press called “Gay Rights and Wrongs: Another Perspective.” Her column was a response to an opinion written by the newspaper's editor-in-chief.

“As a Black woman who happens to be an alumnus of the University of Toledo's Graduate School, an employee and business owner, I take great umbrage at the notion that those choosing the homosexual lifestyle are 'civil rights victims,'” she wrote. “Here's why. I cannot wake up tomorrow and not be a Black woman. I am genetically and biologically a Black woman and very pleased to be so as my Creator intended. Daily, thousands of homosexuals make a life decision to leave the gay lifestyle evidenced by the growing population of PFOX (Parents and Friends of Ex Gays) and Exodus International just to name a few.”

Groid Watch #racist niggermania.net

I'm a bit of a nerd, and I enjoy playing games like Warhammer and such. Basically, a bunch of guys move around models of dudes and use measurements and dice rolls to simulate a war. I did this as a young teenager, and it was a lot of fun. As an adult, coming out of the war made me very antisocial so these games helped me make friends and enjoy interacting with people again. These games can be played at your own home, on a large table- but most people go and play them at gaming stores. In these stores, people will play various games on the tables that the store sells. It's usually very social and fun.

Most young kids play Pokemon and Yu-Gi-Oh, which are little Japanese card games where different cards do different things and represent different monsters and powers. If you have children, you probably already know this. Most of the guys I game with have kids that will play the card games while they are playing the war games. It's a family event to go to the game shop on weekends...

... but then the niggers ruin everything.

At some point, the niggers figured out how these card games work. Yes, the card games for children ages 6-12. I'm impressed that they've come so far. Anyway, the niggers will show up and ruin it all. See, the niggers will be around 17 years old, playing with little 8 year olds. The niggers will bully and intimidate the kids, often threatening children until those kids put their cards down and leave. Niggers will also corner them in the parking lot and take their little books of cards. Or, if a nigger loses it will chimp out. Nothing is sadder than watching a near-adult buck nigger raise his fist and scream at an 8-year-old white child because the white child beat the nigger in a game about little cartoon monsters.

Even worse, the younger niggers will do this thing where they run up to guys playing the war games, and one niglet will be asking the guy questions while the other little niggers grab his books, dice, models, or whatever else they can get their hands on. Common protocol when this happens is for us to walk into the parking lot and chase the little niggers until they give us the guy's stuff back, or wait 20 minutes and call the other shops in town because the niggers will go straight there to sell the models. These models are quite expensive.

Believe it or not, some women play these games as well, or go to watch their boyfriends or husbands play. Niggers will notoriously harass them if they go out for a smoke. GOD FORBID you make these niggers leave, because if you do- the niggers will be online on the store's social media page claiming a bunch of racist 'alt-right' KKK guys threatened them when they just wanted to play games. Then the nigger apologists will drive two hours to come and start trying to intimidate people at the shop and making a scene.

The shops are getting less customer traffic now. Most people are just starting private gaming clubs (with 'no niggers allowed' being the unspoken rule). People buy their stuff and leave. No one brings their wife or girlfriend in. Women have stopped playing there. Funny thing- a few months ago, all the shops had a 'NO FIREARMS' policy. Now the shops have taken down those signs and allow CHL holders to carry in their stores. I WONDER WHY.

The whitest, nerdiest, most harmless thing in the world- and niggers can't stand it... they have to come in and ruin it. Used to, niggers would point and laugh at this- which meant they stayed away from it. But I guess they just assumed nerds were pushovers and thought they could come and ruin their good times. Niggers don't understand the concept of a fair game, a fun social event, or a hobby that helps make friends. Niggers only care about 'muh win', and will cheat, fight, steal, and threaten to get what they want. I see now why sports were ruined when niggers were allowed to participate.

lrhubbard #conspiracy oprah.com

My fiance's friend has been visiting us occasionally for years now. I never suspected anything, but last month he brought a brown teddy bear as a gift for my daughter. With recent revelations, I am not very startled. Can this be a hint that he is connected to this 'pedobear' group? I am unsure what to do next, how can I make sure my daughter is safe?

Dr Lisa Nolland #fundie virtueonline.org

BORN GAY' IS DEAD

Dr Lisa Nolland spells out why the idea is wrong and must now be consigned to the cemetery of thought

Both the church and society have long struggled with the issue of homosexuality.

Is it a crime? Is it an illness? Is it a sin? Is it simply a normal variant of human sexuality? And what difference do the answers to these questions make in the 'real world'?

A brief recent history

In the 1960s, American singer Anita Bryant campaigned against homosexuality, saying that gay people are made, not born, and that they had to recruit youngsters in order to maintain their numbers. This frightened the heterosexual community, and gay people in turn felt under threat.

Then, in 1973, the American Psychiatric Association was pressurised by gay activists into pronouncing that homosexuality was not an illness, but a normal variant of sexuality. This decision is widely recognised as having been political rather than scientific, but it laid the foundation for the decisive game-changer that was to come.

A game-changer

In 1989 two brilliant Harvard graduates, Kirk and Madsen, wrote the seminal After the Ball, which argued that 'for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been "born gay"-- even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood...'

The brilliance of this strategy was twofold: by arguing for 'born gay', gays were able to qualify for special treatment as a vulnerable 'minority group'. Also this strategy elicited much more sympathy for them in the public domain because 'it's not their fault'. That public sympathy remains to this day, and 'orientation' is considered to be immutable.

Ignoring inconvenient truth

In 2007, Professor Michael King made a submission to the Church of England on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Embarrassingly for the College, the document was criticised by CORE Issues Trust as having made no reference to twin studies, which had been central to the scientific discussion for several years.

These studies showed that if one identical twin grew up to be gay, the other usually did not. The inescapable conclusion was that, since both had the same genes and hormonal experiences in the womb, the difference in sexuality must be accounted for mainly by their different experiences and perceptions during early childhood. Gay people were not born that way.

All of this was absent from the College's submission. Missing too was any reference to a major Danish study, published just the previous year, which found 'evidence that childhood family experiences are important determinants of heterosexual and homosexual marriage decisions in adulthood.'

The Royal College's submission claimed that:
• Causation was 'biological', so a person is born gay
• One's sexual orientation is 'fundamental' and thus immutable
• If one tries to change one's sexuality (by therapy) one is liable to be harmed and cited several scientific studies to support these claims.

Importance of postnatal

Unfortunately, the studies didn't support their arguments and, when challenged, the College quietly issued a new position statement in 2014 which says: 'Sexual orientation is determined by a combination of biological and postnatal environmental factors' -- exactly what Kirk and Madsen had recognised but concealed 25 years previously. The College also now acknowledged that 'it is not the case that sexual orientation is immutable or might not vary to some extent during a person's life'.

The word 'postnatal' in the above affirmation is very important because it refers to events that happen after birth -- so the person was not born that way. Yet Professor King continues in denial: 'It is deeply misleading to state that people are not "born gay" and that their sexual desires can change.' He cites inter alia the work of the respected lesbian scholar Lisa Diamond.

Out of the bag

Unfortunately for Professor King, Lisa Diamond's research cannot be enlisted to support his claims. In July 2015, the New Scientist published her remarkable article, 'Sexuality is fluid -- it's time to get past "born this way".' She states: '... whenever someone comes up with a tag line like 'we're born that way', they ultimately do everyone involved a disservice. It is time to just take the whole idea of sexuality as immutable, the born this way notion, and just come to a consensus as scientists and as legal scholars that we need to put it to rest. It's unscientific ... it's totally irrelevant and just politics.'

This amounts to a complete unravelling of the strategy of Kirk and Madsen. But 'born gay' has done its work: the general public has been duped. Now they need to hear: 'You were misled. "Born gay" is dead and was never true!'

This does not of itself mean that therapy can help every individual to change their sexual 'orientation'. It does, however, open up that possibility, which gay activists have long sought to close down.

In California, now, the most draconian legislation to date is being promoted; will the church even realize what is happening and respond?

However, brave clients who have benefited from therapy are beginning to make their voices heard. CORE Issues Trust's excellent (but banned!) DVD, Voices of the Silenced, is being well received. One can purchase it here: https://www.core-issues.org/vos-dvd

May I suggest ordering a copy and seeing for yourself? If you think it beneficial, do pass it on to your church team.

Truncated responses

Some other groups are unwilling to explore the possibilities of change for those who have unwanted Same Sex Attraction (SSA). In my opinion, they are unable to offer a full analysis of what is going on, or engage with how best to respond.

Though individuals are undoubtedly helped through these ministries -- and God bless all the good they do -- the real threat is a pernicious ideology: Cultural Marxism, with its determination to stamp out 'bourgeois' values, and its totalitarian instincts. LGBT issues are but one aspect of what is far more encompassing, and which is rapidly enveloping the West, even the church.

Indeed, there appears to be little awareness that basic freedom is being destroyed, professionals forced to spout the 'Party Line', and millions of children force-fed a diet of LGBT rights. And on and on...

Getting on the front foot

Apart from exposing 'born gay' fraud and promoting the value of ministries like CORE, I would like to leave my readers with three comments.

First: Christians must fully re-engage with both Genesis and Jesus across issues of human sexuality. Who is immune from the damage of sexual brokenness? But here, to note, homosexuality is not an equivalent to heterosexuality: The former is post-Fall while heterosexuality is God-made and God-given. Our very bodies (with a tiny exception for intersex) are heterosexually designed. There is no such thing as a gay body!

Secondly, why has one narrative of SSA been privileged above others and allowed to dominate and silence them? How is that fair? Sadly, those with different stories are ignored and tacitly marginalised. A few years ago, an ex-gay friend preached at an evangelical church; afterwards he was told by half a dozen or so individuals (separately) that they too had the T-shirt but few knew. It was too risky to 'come out' in that way. Voices of the Silenced allows those who have been helped by therapy to speak. Please listen to them: I think they count too.

Thirdly, a dear friend has long struggled with unwanted SSA. He could locate no apparent reason why he had been cursed with it. Recently, though, there has been progress. Now with his third therapist, lights are coming on. But this would not have happened had he accepted he was 'born gay' or must be gay but celibate. In fact, his SSA is but the symptom of profound trauma, which God is beginning to heal.

So 'born gay'-- and all that is claimed along with it -- must go!

Christopher Doyle #fundie voiceofthevoiceless.info

Rose Pascarell, the vice president of University Life at GMU, said that “Chollar handled the situation in the gentlest way possible, performing his duties as a licensed clinical social worker by explaining his concerns with reparative therapy.” According to Pascarell, prominently displaying the ex-gay resources would interfere with the goal of providing students support and would be giving them information that mainstream associations have said can be harmful to an individual.

But providing students support is exactly what the university is failing to do by limiting the LGBTQ Resource Center to only one viewpoint on homosexuality. In fact, one of the brochures that Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays (PFOX) gave GMU to display was a set of brochures on tolerance for the ex-gay community, and none of the brochures were actually about therapy.

micky_x:- , NONE.LIKEYOU #fundie forums.soompi.com

[ Is it okay to have opposite-sex friends if you're exclusively dating someone?
I just recently talked to the girl I'm seeing about maintaining opposite-sex friendships if our relationship gets more serious. I have a few close female friends since university days and I'm wondering if it is okay to keep contact with them even if my relationship to the current girl I'm seeing gets more serious. However, she thinks it is a bad idea because things can get slippery. Any opinions?
]

micky_x:-: If you can see yourself being with this girl for a very long time I would suggest you do as she says.
Most of you would say no don't give up your friends. But your friends should be the ones to understand the situation.

Girls, you can keep depending yourself and saying you won't get jealous if your man was best friends with another girl who you know is a lot prettier than you, but when it really comes down to it, you're dying inside. You're constantly wondering what their doing. And your friends will constantly ask you if you're okay with that. Trust me. If you want someone, fight for it. Do as they say. & if you lose your friends because of her, then they weren't your friends to start with.
Been there, done that. Get over it. If your friends don't understand your situation and if your life depends on your friends, then don't get a girlfriend.
& if your a girl, giving your man space to hang out with his "guy" friends is better than giving him space to hang with his "girl" friends.You really honestly think your man wont leave you if you keep allowing him to just go off and meet girls? Pshh. Good luck with that.


NONE.LIKEYOU : No in my case. I'm not going to outright demand someone I'm dating to stop talking to all his girl friends, but you can bet that my flags are going off and that I'll be super alert to how he acts and what he says to those friends. Call me suspicious, untrusting, paranoid, but with my understanding of female-male relationships (especially at this age), there's no such thing as close friends or exes who are on good terms. So, yes, I'd be the "over possessive" type in that I would be highly uncomfortable with my boyfriend speaking regularly to a recent ex, or having girl friends that are highly emotionally compatible with him. The fact that she voiced it out to you (in my opinion) shows that she trusts you enough to let you see this more vulnerable, insecure side to her that is typically not regarded as 'attractive'. It's not chic or cool to be jealous, but I have the feeling that most of us are more sensitive than we act.

Of course, this is just how I see it. But that's my answer for you: it's not really okay,

majinsoftware #racist resistance.com

(In a topic asking why white women marry outside of their race)

I think i have a idea why white women would like non-white men. It probley comes down to them feeling better about them selfs and having more contol. How easy would it be to feel good about your self when your always with some one that is less then your self (being non-white). If they were with a white partner they would be more equal and have more expected from them.

Well it is sort of the same for my friends brother who has a non-white girl friend. I asked him why and he said because she is easy to control and doesnt expect as much of him as any of his EX white girl friends.

Demerzel #fundie forum.gateworld.net

[ I disagree. This is not about semantics. It's about what lines you think it is okay to cross in the name of saving "innocent lives." If you are willing to allow innocents to be tortured to save other innocents I would find that rather ironic given that the justification for the torture of innocents is the protection of innocent lives. ]

How do you know the person being tortured is innocent? Why did you assume we knew the information beforehand? If we did, torture wouldn't be needed. We're talking about terrorists here. Not the use of torture on a victim that may or may not be guilty. That was never the point. Once more, considering the US government only recruits its very best and elite operatives for the few units that could come across those situations, I trust they'd know the right thing to do. Not the moral thing. The right thing.

Asking ME that question is not a good idea. I am pro atomic bomb, pro death penalty, and if you asked me, terrorists would have no right whatsoever, they'd have less rights than my cat. I am not officer material, nor am I the most moral person ever. So if needed, I'd go pretty darn far. Good thing I'll never be in that kind of situation or have that kind of authority.I certainly value the lives of my family and friends more than some random foreign family. And hell, I'm not even a patriot in any way. But ever since my best friend lost her uncle in the WTC tragedy and then watched her sink deeply into depression and worse, and after serving in the army, I have ZERO tolerance or pity for terrorists and what happens to them when they get caught. They attack our freedom and OUR rights. Why should we give them any rights whatsoever?

[ Well, as you, I live in this world, and I'm sitting in this very moment on my computer, as you do, and of course I know that torture exists in civilised nations, and that it is used under special circumstances. But, it is forbidden, and it should be forbidden, and that is a good thing. Only under this strict law a civilised nation is able to keep this interrogation method as rare as possible, also to protect their own people. Really, I feel better if I know that not every single policeman, or any soldier is allowed to use torture to act as one thinks best. Because this happens if torture is allowed by law. Really, would you prefer to live in a nation, where torture is not restricted? Those nations exists in this world, and I don't want to live there. ]

I don't know for you. But I served my country, I was in the army for two years. So while now yes, I am here, I actually went and saw how it was for myself and it changed my life and my way of seeing the world.

And of course I wouldn't live in a country where torture is freely used. Of course I am glad only a very small number of operatives within the government are allowed to do these things.My point all along has never been that torture is a beautifully effective method that should be used all the time. It is simply that it has its place sometimes, and its uses. It's not perfect, it's not right. A lot of good men did questionable things for the greater good. One would argue that Truman shouldn't have ordered the nuclear attack on Japan. A lot of people were killed, innocent people. A lot more would have died, Americans, had he not done what he did.

But I'll say this. Some terrorists don't care about their own lives, but if confronted with their family about to die or get hurt, they might be willing to talk. Doesn't make it right, but it's still an option I would consider. I could go ahead and quote about 20 highly respected people like Patton, Wilde, Von Clausewitz, Asimov and a number of fabled generals and leaders that have plainly said that morals can't get in the way of doing what's right and that sometimes innocent lives must be sacrificed so that a greater number can live.

Kingkaijoker #sexist reddit.com

Weddings are the ultimate cuck

My Chad friend (6'1", athletic) is having a wedding. I'm not even sure I want to go, he has a typical Stacy girlfriend who wouldn't even accept my advances, even though I bet he's cheated on my friend with so many. But my grotesque face and body are a Stacey turn off. I hate my incel body, I can't get any girl not even a slut. Going to weddings are just for loser cucks who want to see Chad's and Stacey's show off to us incels that they're able to fuck.

If I go I want to just interrupt when the ceremony says if there should be a reason to why they shouldn't marry and call her out on being a stuck up Stacey slut. Should I? Any ideas on how I can ruin their special day?

Reb Gutman Locks #fundie mpaths.com

On my well to the Kotel yesterday afternoon, I saw a large group of young Jewish tourists. I scanned the crowd to see which one to target. There was a young man sitting in the middle of a group of his friends. I walked over and pointed my finger at him. (Remember, this kid did not know me from Adam. He just saw some old, Jewish man with a gray beard walk up out of the blue and point his finger at him.)

"Where are you from?" I asked.

"Los Angeles," he answered, looking curious as to why a completely stranger would walk up to him and ask him a question.

I pointed my finger toward his face and said, "You better marry a Jewish girl!"

His mouth dropped open. He quickly glanced at his friends sitting next to him, and looking a bit frightened, he said, "How... how did he know?"

I pointed to the sky and said, "G-d." Then, I pointed back toward his face, shook my finger, and walked away.

He was stunned. I left him staring at me with his mouth hanging open.

I don't know if I will ever hear what happened to him, but I bet that he is going to think twice before he marries that non-Jewish girl. When he thinks about it, he might even close his eyes and see this old Jewish man with a white beard, pointing his finger, and saying, "G-d."

Sparrow's Song #fundie incels.co

That's why we need incel only social circles. Normies make me cringe and I don't want to become one or be an ally of their authoritarian regime. Even if I had friends and a gf, if I had do go normie blue pill to get that satisfaction in life, it's like a lobotomy.

That's what scares me about trying to ascend out of incel hell. If I ever get femoid affection, will I still have my soul? What will I become? A hollow shell of a once upright man? I'm totally enthusiastic about LMSmaxxing, but if these vile femoids change my spirit, it would be like roping my true self. Fuck changing for these heartless nightmare beings, society should fucking change.

Fake Fandom: Excerpt From Chapter 4; Anti-Humanity Countercultures | Paul's Passing Thoughts #kinkshaming #pratt paulspassingthoughts.com

In previous chapters, the attempted reformation of the Fandom by the Burned Furs, attempts directed squarely at Mark Merlino, reveal in vivid detail the beginning characteristics of the Fandom. Merlino passively or actively condoned all the characteristics protested against. As documented in the Burned Fur manifesto, a New Age-like anthropomorphic spirituality was prevalent in the movement and is even more prevalent today. Furries routinely refer to their true identities being found in an animal.

As noted in psychological studies that will be looked at closer in this book, the goal is not to become an animal, but to incorporate more and more animalism into the humanity of furries. This is because animals are not all hung-up on human barriers. Beagles relieve themselves on fire hydrants in front of all without giving it a second thought. If a beagle wants to mate with a poodle in someone’s front yard, the pair give the desire no second thought. Gee, if only humans were like that. After all, look at how hung-up we are about many things resulting in unnecessary expenditures for things like bathrooms. Humans spend a lot of money to prevent indiscretions; otherwise known as “hang-ups,” and being “overly serious.”

The list on this perspective can go on and on. Dog’s are man’s best friend and infinitely loyal. Pets never argue with you, and we can even speak for them with no protest by the pet. If only humans were more like that. This is where there is a fine line between philosophy and religion; anthropomorphism, in its most ancient forms, was a rejection of the human race. What better way to reject humanity than ascribing to being more like an animal? Biblicists point to the Apostle Paul’s indictment of humanity at its earliest stages: “they worshiped the creature instead of the creator.” We are speaking to an anti-humanity ideology. Remember, anthropomorphism personifies nonhuman objects, which includes animals, but does not exclude any nonhuman objects like trees, rocks, water, and clouds. People who worship trees are not nuts, they just think trees are better than humans, and if God created humans, He couldn’t be much better. Hatred for humanity will find a contending meaning in anything but humanity. After all, what else is there in the material world? The extreme depends on the degree of disdain. Never underestimate the power of preference by default and what one will do in choosing it.

As noted earlier in this book, the first fanzines of the Fandom were the Vootie APAs. Their stated manifesto was very clear: “No humans (or human logic) allowed.” Characteristics of the Fandom’s beginning followed as detailed by the Burned Furs: any behavior considered abnormal by society at large was vigorously pursued by furries including plushophilia (sex with stuffed animals), zoophilia (bestiality), necrophilia (sex with a corpse), and a list of behaviors becoming and unbecoming of animals who don’t typically masturbate in elevators. Countercultures are such because humans are responsible for culture.

TSlidec #fundie reddit.com

Rule of thumb:

* If a woman is at the gym, don't hit on her.

* if a woman is in class, don't hit on her.

* if a woman is at the store, don't hit on her.

* if a woman is at church, don't hit on her.

* If a woman is at work, definitely don't hit on her.

* if a woman is walking late at night or in a parking lot, DO NOT HIT ON HER OR RUN REALLY FAST BEHIND HER. She will actually think you're trying to murder her.

Really, just be out in the day, do your normal routine, and see if the woman makes eye contact with you repeatedly (don't stare, but occasionally glance over at odd second intervals). If she does, walk up slowly and say hi in a timid voice, introduce yourself and ask about what she is doing (if at a coffee shop, ask about her drink). Bring out your phone and white knight on reddit.

Make light banter while defending women. If she's looking like she wants to leave (holding tight to her bag, glancing away, checking her phone, blinking quickly, breathing rapidly) wish her a good day (m'lady) and leave quickly. If she curls her hair behind her ear, makes direct eye contact a lot, and smiles--get those digits.

Christopher Doyle #fundie truthwinsout.org

In a shocking admission, Christopher Doyle, a board member for Parents & Friends of Ex-Gays (PFOX) and blogger for the Christian Post, admits that while he was an adolescent he got in trouble for molesting “little girls” that his mother was responsible for watching in her daycare center. According to “Christopher’s Story,” which was previously posted on PFOX’s website, Doyle confessed:

“I tried to have sex with the little girls that my mother watched in her daycare, and eventually, one of the girls told her parents what I was doing. The shame that was placed on me by my parents was more than I could bear. Rather than rescue me, teach me, and put me in counseling, the ‘bad boy’ was left alone to deal with all of this shame.”

Doyle claims that he was only ten years old at the time of the illegal incidents. Still, such disturbing behavior is rather unusual and raises enormous red flags in our view, considering Doyle’s access to youth as a therapist. He is currently a counselor at the International Healing Foundation (IHF), a business where the therapists regularly pet vulnerable clients in a technique called “touch therapy.” IHF has long focused on youth and its founder, Richard Cohen, has written a bizarre “ex-gay” children’s book “Alfie’s Home.” Doyle is also a key member of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), which claims that 50% of their clients are LGBT youth.

Perhaps most alarming, Doyle has started a company, Acception Productions, that is working to get its anti-gay videos — that deceptively pretend to be anti-bullying videos — into public schools. At the time of publication, Doyle has not provided the ages of the girls he admits to “trying to have sex with.”

It could be that Doyle’s confessed youthful perversion only occurred during that time period, many years ago. However, one must take pause when looking a his career, one that disturbingly goes through great lengths to place Doyle in close proximity to youth.

The question that parents should ask: Do they want Christopher Doyle, given his notorious past, engaging in touch therapy with their sons and daughters?

RipleyRiot #sexist reddit.com

Little background: I have a 14 year old friend and her GF just told her she thinks she might be trans. We’ve all seen this before, lesbian feels like she might be trans... thing is we know what might have gotten her to that conclusion, my question is: How can we open a discussion to make her think about those reasons? How can we help her see the real reasons behind this?

But in conversation, cause it’d be easy to just list everything to her but I wanted to help her get to those conclusions herself. So far I’ve suggested my friend asks her why she doesn’t like her body and show her parallels on how all women are indoctrinated to hate our bodies and so that downs alw you trans, just means you’re being successfully socialized as a woman....Help!?

Bruce #conspiracy illuminatiwatchdog.blogspot.ca

The Walt Disney company is one of the most pervasive and perverse organizations working to destroy the minds of our children. In 1995, it began coordinating with Steve Jobs' new start-up, Pixar, and has become more evil ever since. No doubt, the Illuminati use this mega-corporation as its main force to brainwash the youths of the world, and one of its most glaring examples can be found in the computer-animated classic "Monsters Inc."

Not only is there overt symbolism in this movie, but the story line itself serves as a metaphor for the Illuminati's quest to indoctrinate kids. We'll look at the film's images first with the most notable reference being the Eye of Providence in the Monsters Inc. logo. That eye is ever-present throughout the movie and serves as a reminder that the Illuminati controls us. Let's also not forget that the fictional company serves to provide energy. This is also symbolic of today's energy companies and how they rule our lives. Take the Koch brothers for example, these two order members literally run America and do so on the foundation of oil.

The All Seeing Eye references don't stop there either. One of the main characters, Mike Wazowski (voiced by Billy Crystal), is a little green blob boasting one eye and devil's horns. Sure, he acts cute and seems friendly, and that's the trap. The Illuminati is using this character to try to impress upon children that it's nice and cool, while simultaneously telling them that it's in charge. Could the evil film makers be anymore genius?

Yes, they can, and they do it too in the sequel, "Monsters University". In this humorously dark film, the All Seeing Eye can be seen not just in the company's logo but also the logo of a college. This is also an Illuminati message telling people that the order not only controls the energy companies but also academia. Do not let professors and so-called experts tell you that the Illuminati is long gone and the NWO is a paranoid conspiracy. They're either severely brainwashed or part of the order. Just ask anyone who has tried to introduce new ideas to scholarship. Unless those "ideas" fit Illuminati purposes, they're tossed and slimed along with the people who proposed them.

That brings us back to our discussion of "Monsters Inc." and it's twisted purposes. We've covered the symbolism. Now, let's cover the metaphor of how the Illuminati gets into our children's heads. The film does this by showing monsters scaring children at night to obtain energy and presents an image of terror in the dark. Eventually, one of the kids becomes enchanted with the monsters and befriends them. This is how Illuminati brainwash works. The order implants terrifying ideas into children's minds in unbelievable ways, and once the kids are familiar enough with the imagery and ideas, they become enamored with them. Just as they show us in the film.

Take_Me_Back_Please & Former-Incel-User #sexist reddit.com

image

JFL when you know that this relationship is only alive because the husband remains alpha. This man knows his shit. He compliments other women in front of his wife and punishes her for not following his sexual demands. If he stopped being "misogynistic" and started being subservient to his wife, she'd leave him in a heartbeat.

This lady is pretending that this sickens her because she's probably been infected with feminism and is now being pulled in two directions. Her natural and true female side loves her husband's so-called misogyny while her feminist-addled side believes that she SHOULD be hating her husband for doing this and that all she wants is a nice beta male.

So the correct way to keep a girlfriend isn’t to treat her as an equal and as a companion, but as a sex toy.

Sweet.

This is just evil.

Nobody said to use her as a sex toy. The point is to remain dominant/alpha and focusing on yourself. The husband just does his thing and doesn't revolve around his wife like a beta orbiter cuck. This keeps her interested in him.

How many times have we heard of wives/gfs cheating on their super caring husband/bf because of the fact that he was too "boring". And by boring they mean he was too nice and pretty much acted like a servant to the woman, caving in to her every command and orbiting her. This shit is so fucking COMMON it's unreal.

It’s evil that the women require you to be a total shithead to keep her interested. I’m not even talking about acting like an insanely subservient beta, but just like a normal person. As in being loving and caring but also assertive when needed. And that isn’t attractive, either.

Lmao at people telling you to care for your partner. When in reality she is only good for her pussy.

It’s like having a girlfriend or wife is completely pointless. Having a partner is useless.

We legit have to tell/train men NOT TO BE TOO NICE in order to get women. I mean what in the fuck. We have to teach men to not be nice and how to act like assholes in order to get women. Why? Why can't we just be nice? If being nice and kind to women made them like you, then men would gladly be nice and caring sweethearts since that is us by default.

Why is the world like this?

Because that is what women want deep down. They don’t want an equal partner. They don’t want to be in a relationship where both parties take care of each other’s needs. They don’t want to offer emotional support to their boyfriend. They just want to be dominated and be treated like some side chick. It’s better to not care than it is to care. I almost wonder if it is more sexually attractive to laugh at your girlfriend or ignore her when she’s crying than it is to comfort her or ask her what’s wrong.

I used to try to put myself in women's shoes to understand their way of thinking. But now I realize that that's pointless because their minds don't function the same as us.

I would LOVE a caring and gentle relationship. Just imagine being kind, loving and loyal to your gf, and having her reciprocate that. An incel can only dream. When one of you breaks down due to some pain or depression, you don't see them as weak, you support them through it. You love each other unconditionally.

This world could've been such a beautiful adventure. The potential it had ... all gone to waste.

Oh, and sorry for calling you gay. I thought you were some IT fag trying to misconstrue being alpha in the relationship as a male as evil. I thought you meant like what the husband was doing was evil or something.

Nah you’re good. It’s evil that women require men to be alpha.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

If enough Americans felt the way I do, we'd be able to run the wicked out of this nation! And a glorious day that would be! Thankfully (and I get goosebumps just thinking about it) the Lord is literarily coming back one day soon, and when He does the wicked are going to tremble as they face the reality of the Lake of Fire for all eternity. Carrie Underwood is headed for that Lake of Fire. Judas knew Jesus and went straight to Hell.

I say hooray to Jesus!!! Yeah Jesus!!! If you want to cheer and shout for lesbians and bisexuals, for God-haters and seducers, for blasphemers and adulterers, for sluts and sleazy singers, for drunkard actors and drug-addicted entertainers, for immoral sports athletes and rebels, for sicko comedians and low-life American Idols, for idolaters and sex-perverts—then you go right on ahead my friend, but Jesus Christ is coming back soon, and He's not in a good mood (I assure you) over the wickedness in the world today.

Hebrews 1:9 quotes Psalms 45:7 concerning Christ, “Thou lovest righteousness, and hatest wickedness: therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.” Psalms 97:10, “Ye that love the LORD, hate evil: he preserveth the souls of his saints; he delivereth them out of the hand of the wicked.” The Lord hates evil and so should we as Christians. Sadly, most professed Christians today are cowards, silent concerning public evils and abominations. Carrie Underwood is leading a generation of youth into sexual immorality and sin. This is not of God.

Underwood's fans may think she is humble, but she's arrogant and sinfully proud. Anytime we choose to place our self upon the throne of our life instead of God, it's only because we are sinfully proud. Underwood's videos are all sensual, looking at the camera like she wants to have sex with the viewer. That's exactly what they're intended to do. It's all part of the Communist moral subversion of America. Sadly, young people today think everything's a big joke. The laugh about preaching and morals. When 42 children mocked Elisha's bald head as the preacher, telling him to get lost, two female bears tore them up severely and no doubt many died (2nd Kings 2:23-24).

Only a fool mocks the things of Jesus Christ. Noah's sons backed toward their father, taking great caution to avoid looking upon his nakedness. This teaches us the proper attitude toward nakedness. For Carrie Underwood to flaunt her healthy body that God gave her, wearing the attire of a prostitute, gyrating in sexual positions for every lustful man and woman to sinfully commit adultery in their heart with—is wickedness beyond description.

justforlulzandkeks #sexist reddit.com

Re: "Stupid inkel, women don't care about size, and they definitely won't tell their friends about it"

image

Lmao, look at this roastie's comment (which she later deleted), she spills the brutal truth

As a girl I can tell you, OP, that when I tell my friends I slept with someone new their first question after "how was it?" is always "how big was he?"

I'm sorry because of course that sucks and society should change to be more genuinely body positive, but it's a fact of life right now. Your gf might have only been answering a direct question from her best friends at first, and once they know something like that they're going to keep bringing it up. It's okay to feel hurt, obviously, because we all want to think that our SO is showing respect to our feelings at all times. But I wouldn't say you should set fire to the whole relationship, because this is, unfortunately, a fairly normal way that girls talk. So if she's a good gf for you otherwise, I'd say to at least try to work on it with her or tell her your feelings and give her a chance to work on it. Without ever looking through her phone again.

It's OVER for dicklets, this is why euthanasia needs to be legalised

You can literally ignore anyone who says size doesn't matter, they're either lying out of malice or to virtue signal, or they are completely ignorant

shadowsoulz125, Weed #fundie incels.co

[Under a topic called "Inceldom causes sociopath tendencies".]

shadowsoulz125: It has warped my mind to a point where my younger self would be absolutely horrified of my true thoughts. I don't care, nor love anyone at this point. Even if somehow an attractive roastie is into me, I would probably just treat her like a tool to get off. Nothing more nothing less.

[...]

Weed: Because if you were a real sociopath you would do drugs lsd like every week.. Sociopaths are adrenaline junkies, they get bored EASILY so they have to do something like 'lash out' on someone. If you were a sociopath you would accept humanity does not want you because of inceldom and you would start killing. I wish I was a sociopath tho, I think I would actually slay being a sociopath with very good social skills and tactics, manipulation and being very high T. Maybe I wouldn't have a recessed chin because probs like 95% of sociopaths are 7+/10 due to theirs N A T U R A L very high T levels. Fuark I am just having a fantasy about that. I had sociopathic symptoms when I was a kid. I don't know maybe we grew out of being sociopaths? Is that possible? Might be. I actually killed few animals and tortured my pet, threw shit all over the walls in kindergarten (I dont remember that my mom told me, mb I was 4 lmao). Me and my friend would collect snails in plastic bags and throw them against a wall watching em smash and I was like "ooo holy shit lmao llololololo", ya feel me.. but now I have a cat, my cat loves me because I love him and I have empathy towards him, we cuddle sometimes no homo because he's a bic boi. I like animals more than humans. I am being serious.. I can watch human gore but never animal gore, mostly I am disgusted by cat gore and get angry. When I watched Ice Man killer interview he was talking about killing a cat brutally and I remember getting angry at him and wanting to punch that cunt but then he switched talking from cats to humans and I calmed down and didn't mind I was kind of fascinated.

James #conspiracy montanatruthseekers.wordpress.com

[Just a snippet from this guy's conspiracy]

Project Blue Beam is a project to bring in a new age one world religion that the anti-christ will head. Phase one is engineered earthquakes and hoaxed archeological discoveries to dispute the divinity of Jesus Christ as well as every other religion on the planet. Also part of phase one is the psychological conditioning of the people through the media and various entrainment mediums to promote such ideas as friendly aliens, evolution, secular humanism, and breeding with fallen angels/demons/friendly aliens. If you take a look at how they slowly brought in the friendly alien theology with cute shows like ALF and movies like ET, and how they have moved on to openly singing about mating with the aliens to form a hybird race in recent times like Katy Perry’s ET song and movies like “The Preachers Wife”, “City of Angels”, or “Splice” you will see that the psychological conditioning has been underway for quite sometime.

A small side note about ALF: Do you ever wonder why ALF has a fascination with eating cats? I think it is a pun off of aliens wanting human women. I will not be vulgar about it though.

Doug Mainwaring #fundie thepublicdiscourse.com

I'm Gay and I Oppose Same-Sex Marriage

While religion and tradition have led many to their positions on same-sex marriage, it’s also possible to oppose same-sex marriage based on reason and experience.

“I know in my heart that man is good, that what is right will always eventually triumph, and there is purpose and worth to each and every life.” These words, spoken by Ronald Reagan in 1991, are framed on the wall above my desk. As a gay man, I’ve adopted them as my own, as I’ve entered the national discussion on same-sex marriage.

I wholeheartedly support civil unions for gay and lesbian couples, but I am opposed to same-sex marriage. Because activists have made marriage, rather than civil unions, their goal, I am viewed by many as a self-loathing, traitorous gay. So be it. I prefer to think of myself as a reasoning, intellectually honest human being.

The notion of same-sex marriage is implausible, yet political correctness has made stating the obvious a risky business. Genderless marriage is not marriage at all. It is something else entirely.

Opposition to same-sex marriage is characterized in the media, at best, as clinging to “old-fashioned” religious beliefs and traditions, and at worst, as homophobia and hatred.

I’ve always been careful to avoid using religion or appeals to tradition as I’ve approached this topic. And with good reason: Neither religion nor tradition has played a significant role in forming my stance. But reason and experience certainly have.

Learning from Experience

As a young man, I wasn’t strongly inclined toward marriage or fatherhood, because I knew only homosexual desire.

I first recognized my strong yearning for men at age eight, when my parents took me to see The Sound of Music. While others marveled at the splendor of the Swiss Alps displayed on the huge Cinerama screen, I marveled at the uniformed, blond-haired Rolfe, who was seventeen going on eighteen. That proclivity, once awakened, never faded.

During college and throughout my twenties, I had many close friends who were handsome, athletic, and intelligent, with terrific personalities. I longed to have an intimate relationship with any and all of them. However, I enjoyed something far greater, something which surpassed carnality in every way: philia (the love between true friends)—a love unappreciated by so many because eros is promoted in its stead.

I wouldn’t have traded the quality of my relationships with any of these guys for an opportunity to engage in sex. No regrets. In fact, I always felt like the luckiest man on the planet. Denial didn't diminish or impoverish my life. It made my life experience richer.

Philia love between men is far better, far stronger, and far more fulfilling than erotic love can ever be. But society now promotes the lowest form of love between men while sabotaging the higher forms. Gay culture continues to promote the sexualization of all (viewing one’s self and other males primarily as sexual beings), while proving itself nearly bankrupt when it comes to fostering any other aspect of male/male relationships.

When all my friends began to marry, I began to seriously consider marriage for the first time. The motive of avoiding social isolation may not have been the best, but it was the catalyst that changed the trajectory of my life. Even though I had to repress certain sexual desires, I found marriage to be extremely rewarding.

My future bride and I first met while singing in a youth choir. By the time I popped the question, we had become the very best of friends. “Soul mates” is the term we used to describe each other.

After a couple of years of diligently trying to conceive, doctors informed us we were infertile, so we sought to adopt. That became a long, arduous, heartbreaking process. We ultimately gave up. I had mixed emotions—disappointment tempered by relief.

Out of the blue, a couple of years after we resigned ourselves to childlessness, we were given the opportunity to adopt.

A great shock came the day after we brought our son home from the adoption agency. While driving home for lunch, I was suddenly overcome with such emotion that I had to pull the car off to the side of the road. Never in my life had I experienced such pure, distilled joy and sense of purpose. I kept repeating, “I’m a dad,” over and over again. Nothing else mattered. I knew exactly where I fit in within this huge universe. When we brought home his brother nearly two years later, I was prepared: I could not wait to take him up in my arms and declare our kinship and my unconditional love and irrevocable responsibility for him.

Neither religion nor tradition turned me into a dedicated father. It was something wonderful from within—a great strength that has only grown with time. A complete surprise of the human spirit. In this way and many others, marriage—my bond with the mother of my children—has made me a much better person, a person I had no idea I had the capacity to become.

Intellectual Honesty and Surprise Conclusions

Unfortunately, a few years later my marriage ended—a pain known too easily by too many. At this point, the divorce allowed me to explore my homosexuality for the first time in my life.

At first, I felt liberated. I dated some great guys, and was in a couple of long-term relationships. Over several years, intellectual honesty led me to some unexpected conclusions: (1) Creating a family with another man is not completely equal to creating a family with a woman, and (2) denying children parents of both genders at home is an objective evil. Kids need and yearn for both.

It took some doing, but after ten years of divorce, we began to pull our family back together. We have been under one roof for over two years now. Our kids are happier and better off in so many ways. My ex-wife, our kids, and I recently celebrated Thanksgiving and Christmas together and agreed these were the best holidays ever.

Because of my predilections, we deny our own sexual impulses. Has this led to depressing, claustrophobic repression? No. We enjoy each other’s company immensely. It has actually led to psychological health and a flourishing of our family. Did we do this for the sake of tradition? For the sake of religion? No. We did it because reason led us to resist selfish impulses and to seek the best for our children.

And wonderfully, she and I continue to regard each other as “soul mates” now, more than ever.

Over the last couple of years, I’ve found our decision to rebuild our family ratified time after time. One day as I turned to climb the stairs I saw my sixteen-year-old son walk past his mom as she sat reading in the living room. As he did, he paused and stooped down to kiss her and give her a hug, and then continued on. With two dads in the house, this little moment of warmth and tenderness would never have occurred. My varsity-track-and-football-playing son and I can give each other a bear hug or a pat on the back, but the kiss thing is never going to happen. To be fully formed, children need to be free to generously receive from and express affection to parents of both genders. Genderless marriages deny this fullness.

There are perhaps a hundred different things, small and large, that are negotiated between parents and kids every week. Moms and dads interact differently with their children. To give kids two moms or two dads is to withhold from them someone whom they desperately need and deserve in order to be whole and happy. It is to permanently etch “deprivation” on their hearts.

Rich Versus Diminished Lives

Sexuality is fluid for many, and much more complex than many want to acknowledge. Gay and straight activists alike pretend this isn’t true in order to fortify their positions. If they fail to maintain that mirage, fundraising for their organizations might dry up, as would the requests for television and radio interviews. Yet the “B” in the middle of “LGBT” acknowledges an important reality concerning our human sexuality.

Here’s a very sad fact of life that never gets portrayed on Glee or Modern Family: I find that men I know who have left their wives as they’ve come out of the closet often lead diminished, and in some cases nearly bankrupt, lives—socially, familially, emotionally, and intellectually. They adjust their entire view of the world and their role within it in order to accommodate what has become the dominant aspect of their lives: their homosexuality. In doing so, they trade rich lives for one-dimensional lives. Yet this is what our post-modern world has taught us to do. I went along with it for a long while, but slowly turned back when I witnessed my life shrinking and not growing.

What Now?

In our day, prejudice against gays is just a very faint shadow of what it once was. But the abolition of prejudice against gays does not necessarily mean that same-sex marriage is inevitable or optimal. There are other avenues available, none of which demands immediate, sweeping, transformational legislation or court judgments.

We are in the middle of a fierce battle that is no longer about rights. It is about a single word, “marriage.”

Two men or two women together is, in truth, nothing like a man and a woman creating a life and a family together. Same-sex relationships are certainly very legitimate, rewarding pursuits, leading to happiness for many, but they are wholly different in experience and nature.

Gay and lesbian activists, and more importantly, the progressives urging them on, seek to redefine marriage in order to achieve an ideological agenda that ultimately seeks to undefine families as nothing more than one of an array of equally desirable “social units,” and thus open the door to the increase of government’s role in our lives.

And while same-sex marriage proponents suggest that the government should perhaps just stay out of their private lives, the fact is, now that children are being engineered for gay and lesbian couples, a process that involves multiple other adults who have potential legal custody claims on these children, the potential for government’s involvement in these same-sex marriage households is staggering.

Solomon only had to split the baby in two. In the future, judges may have to decide how to split children into three, four, or five equal pieces. In Florida, a judge recently ordered that the birth certificate of a child must show a total of three parents—a lesbian couple and a gay man (the sperm-providing hairdresser of one of the lesbian moms). Expect much more of this to come.

Statists see great value in slowly chipping away at the bedrock of American culture: faith and family life. The more that traditional families are weakened in our daily experience by our laws, the more that government is able to freely insert itself into our lives in an authoritarian way. And it will.

Mark Regnerus, a sociologist at the University of Texas at Austin, recently said, “I think you can have social stability without many intact families, but it’s going to be really expensive and it's going to look very ‘Huxley-Brave New World-ish.’ So [the intact family is] not only the optimal scenario … but it’s the cheapest. How often in life do you get the best and the cheapest in the same package?”

Marriage is not an elastic term. It is immutable. It offers the very best for children and society. We should not adulterate nor mutilate its definition, thereby denying its riches to current and future generations.

Rush Limbaugh #fundie rushlimbaugh.com

Now, folks, on this, I know a lot of you, you hear this thing -- a bunch of leftists want to try to stop men from looking at women -- and you think they can't do that. That's not the point. Whether they can or can't, it will gain momentum, and it may not be for years, but this is who they are. This is how inane and inviolate they are of basic human nature. It's one of the biggest ways to understand liberal. They just despise human nature and try to alter it and change it and create it, because many of them just don't fit in with it in many ways.

But there's a way around this, guys. You gotta have fun with this, as you know. So let me offer suggestions. The first suggestion, the first way to deal with this that came into my mind, is you find yourself staring, looking at, casually glancing at a woman, but you know that it's now socially taboo. You shouldn't be doing it, and you think everybody is noticing you doing it and condemning you in their minds. You shouldn't be doing it. So you walk up to the woman and say, "Would you please ask your breasts to stop staring at my eyes?"

Try that.

It might help.

You don't know 'til you try it.

JucheforWhitePeople & Swole_Prole #sexist reddit.com

Re: Lifefuel for mentalcels, we are more likely to commit suicide and leave this degenerate world

image

(JucheforWhitePeople)
Ugly mentalcels are the biggest trucels. You're basically fucked for life if you're autistic and ugly. You're doomed to spend your life as a social retard without any friends, much less a gf.

Nobody wants to help you. Worst of all, autistics foids and Chads will live normal lives because people wanted to befriend them.

(Swole_Prole)
Although I’m not autistic I have strong autistic tendencies, you could say, and I don’t feel like social engagement is in any way made easier for me even though I am not ugly.

I am still a friendless loser and outcast of sorts, even if I don’t have the same crippling social inability I had years ago. I take it in its stride though, mostly, but I often feel like an alien among humans.

Roosh V #sexist rooshv.com

How To Stop Incels From Killing People

The busy bees at the media have been highlighting how “dangerous” incels are, often linking them to the manosphere [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. These journalists fail to mention that incels have either outright rejected manosphere ideas, especially when concerning game, or have been inoculated against its teachings by their own media colleagues.

Incels are killing solely because they are failing to bond romantically or sexually with women in an intensely competitive sexual market that constantly rubs sex and nudity in their faces. The solution is rather simple: give them free sex from whores.

What is an incel?
image
It’s first helpful to determine the basic profile of an incel. Typically, he does not have a hands-on masculine father teaching him the ways of life and women. He was teased in school, though not aggressively bullied, and has few friends. He is not good in sports or any other activity that would help give him a sexy aesthetic. He has no skills beyond programming or playing video games. His educational upbringing taught him that any display of masculine behavior is harmful to females, which he has internalized to his own detriment. More severely, he is introverted and has practically no ability to talk to females or attract them.

A decade ago, this type of “herbivore” male become a cultural phenomenon in Japan. In America, it’s now becoming the default man. Within a few years, more than 50% of all men will be on the incel spectrum.

An incel primarily wants a loving relationship with an attractive woman. Secondly, he wants sex with any woman. A male who gets laid but doesn’t experience love may be depressed or unhappy, but he’s unlikely to possess the urge to kill. The ones who do end up killing have received neither relationships nor sex. They feel utterly forsaken by society. To remind society that they do in fact exist, they resort to getting attention in the only way they know how: killing. Shooting up people is the same for an incel as a female uploading a perfect selfie. It’s a way of saying please recognize my existence and validate me for it.

Incels must be provided free prostitutes

I therefore advocate for a government program called Complimentary Heterosexual Affections Directive (CHAD). Incels will be given a mobile QR code for a complimentary legalized sex session every six months, a time interval that would outright eliminate their urge to kill. The whores that are a part of this program would be given special training to make the incels feel special by calling them “handsome,” “powerful,” and “confident,” compliments they have never heard in their lives. The whores would rock their worlds to such an extent that the incels will patiently wait to live in freedom another six months to fornicate again.

The details of the CHAD program would be simple. First, the government would provide an online questionnaire that incels take to qualify for the program. It would not be too strict: if a man hasn’t been laid in at least six months and wants a free whore, it’s better for society to provide it for him to dampen his rising urge to be noticed through a mass shooting.

Whores would apply to the program and work from home or in a designated government brothel that is placed in high population areas. After a sexual experience, the incel would give his government whore a rating on a 1-5 star system. Whores who ever dip under 3 stars would be eliminated from the program, ensuring that the government only hires the best whores for the incels since this is literally a life or death matter.

Single women will pay for the incel’s whores
image
She’s funding the free whores program

Structuring CHAD as a government program will allow women to have “skin in the game”—they’ll be reminded that their choices in sex partners have both financial and mortal consequences. The program will be entirely funded through taxes on the products that enable women to have casual sex with attractive men—birth control, dating apps, and smartphones.

After CHAD is implemented, anyone who wants to buy an iPhone will have to provide government identification that reveals their sex. If the buyer is female and unmarried, an automatic 100% tax will be added. Women will also be taxed $5 for every Tinder match they receive, and each birth control pill purchased by an unmarried woman will come with an extra $1 tax that goes directly to fund CHAD.

Whenever a girl uses her phone to get attention from attractive men, scores a new Tinder match with a hot guy, or pops a birth control pill that let’s her have sex without wanting to reproduce, her mind will flash with the realization that her easy-earned money is going towards incels she refuses to bang. If women are choosing nice guy incels for sex, those incels will not need to use the whore program and thus the tax will be reduced. It’s fine if women want to forsake the bottom 50% of the male population for sexual relationships, but they will have to pay for it so those men don’t kill other citizens. We have to stop the high standards of modern women from causing additional deaths.

An easier and cheaper solution than the CHAD program is to teach men game, particularly the Roosh Program. It instructs an incel to hit the gym, read some books, build up social experience, stop being a wimp, and finally embrace the masculinity that has been smothered for so long. Game may be getting harder in the West, but there are still worthwhile options in South America, Eastern Europe, and Southeast Asia.

Game saves lives
image
This man will not kill anyone

The fact that Jewish organizations, feminist authors, and the media continue to attack me means that they don’t really care that people are getting shot up. Give me an incel on the verge of killing and I’ll hand you back a sexually sated Stan who lives in Thailand for three months of the year, or a beefed-up Oscar who found a dive bar where he can bang porkers on the weekends with barely any effort. Maybe these situation aren’t exactly ideal for Stan or Oscar, but it’s better than rotting in jail or being killed by the police in an exciting shootout that gets millions of views on YouTube.

Of course our cultural elites with not help implement the CHAD or Roosh program. As much as they whine about how older women can’t find any “good men,” and how hard it is for mentally ill trannys to get laid with in a climate of “transphobic” discrimination, they much prefer for incels to fuck off and die. A Silicon Valley executive named Ellen Pao even suggested they never be hired in the first place, which could lead to their starvation. We’re only a year or two off from op-eds in the New York Times suggesting Incel Concentration Camps. Are you a man who women don’t want to sleep with? Off to the gulags! You won’t even be allowed to masturbate.

The reaction of the elites clearly shows that there will be many more incel shooting sprees in the future. They will desperately try to link these killings to pro-masculine dissidents such as myself, but we know that if a man is allowed to find my work and implement it, he would never want to kill in the first place. Let us all hear the incel rallying cry: Give me love, give me whores, or give me game! Otherwise, he just may go crazy.

shetoldmeto80 #sexist reddit.com

Re: How do people start conversations with people they've never talked to before?

If we are talking general social interactions I would say the easiest is probably going based on context. Say you are at a concert, you could just start by commenting something along the lines of "I love this bit!" and see if you can spark a conversation then.

However,
It is increasingly awkward to approach women especially since they seem to have an increasingly lower threshold for getting "creeped out".

Also there are new laws (totally unenforceable but whatever) in some countries that (theoritically) prevent men from approaching random women to begin with.

What are those laws?

And in an honest answer to your question, it's really easy. Just say hi.

It comes across as creepy if you stare at her for ages, creep over, stammer, stumble over your words, and say "I like the smell of your hair".

But if you just walk over like you own the place, say hi, say something interesting about what's going on (maybe you laughingly say "did any of that make no sense at all or was it just me?" in a lecture or class situation) and look cheerful.

Some girls are bitches and will brush you off. Some wont. Most will be friendly back.

I am not OP, I was replying to him, telling him the easiest way is to start the interaction by using the current context. There are other ways but this is by far the easiest.

There is the recent "anti-harassment law" in France for example; media called it "anti cat calling" or "anti wolf whistling"... Essentially it is worded in such a way that if a woman feels even vaguely uncomfortable in your presence you could be fined.

Ironically the woman who authored this law has been caught publishing (under a pen name) "romance stories" involving rape fantasies...

To add further irony many french women actually do not like this law because it makes them "seem even less approachable"...

AsleepMaterial & RareSorbet #sexist reddit.com

Re: GenderCritical

What do you think of that sub?

(AsleepMaterial)
I like their peak trans threads. A lot of the world is kowtowing to moids who simply say they are women, and that supposedly is the end of that discussion. Like even bringing up how a disproportionate number of trans are narcissists, have horrible abhorrent views on women, and who become "trans" after being addicted to anime sissy trap porn is taboo as fuck now. It's like they have a force field that deflects and contorts any criticism.

Calling them the "mirror of incels" would be pretty dismissive though, a lot of them have been actually abused both physically and mentally by men, or grew up around women who were. The worst thing that happened to an average dry dick incel is there wasn't enough thin white becky and stacies to go around lmao, or they were bullied by MEN. I'm not surprised to see incels screaming bloody rage over being subjected to the same hate and generalizations that they give to women though lmfao.

That said, G_C is cliquish and a lot of posters are major assholes who would probably scream in your face IRL if you said a misogynistic joke. I guess they have to be since the entire world pretty much hates their idealogy (trans target them, men target them because they dont like the idea that porn ruined their brain, liberals hate them for not supporting sex workers and trans, conservatives dont like that they are pro choice, etc etc)

(RareSorbet)
I don't agree with them when it comes to trans women. Though I do understand the subs definition of "gender" being just sex ie male, female. And gender being social.

What I love about the sub is that they're open to questioning and discussing everything. In more liberal feminist circles, make-up, porn, potentially dangerous kinks, sex work and Islam are strictly off limits. Talking about gendered trends and origins is apparently the same as calling a woman evil for participating? I personally feel that Feminism is more about liberation than just choice, I choose to wear make-up from time to time but it has nothing to do with liberation. It doesn't help anyone other than myself. Heck, it doesn't even help me. I chose to spend money on it when that could have been put in a savings account, I just enjoy different shades of purple.

Then there's the fact that you can genuinely talk about international women's rights without anti-feminist men, who don't care about those women, using them as an anti-feminist chess piece. They don't pander to Islamic patriarchy like a lot of liberal feminists do under the guise of "intersectionality."

They have nothing to do with incels. I know the drama sub jokingly calls them femcels but it doesn't really make sense, they always talk about their boyfriends and ex's.

Bob Smith #sexist returnofkings.com

9 Secrets About Female Nature Told By A Hot Girl Dying Of Cancer

Many years ago, I became friends with a very hot blonde in her early 30’s who was dying of cancer. Due to her impending death, she decided that it was okay to relay a vast amount of inside information to me, regarding what women were really all about. She volunteered this information. I have never forgotten what she told me, and it has served me quite well over the years.

Here is a summary of the ten things she told me about the true nature of women, which were related to me over the span of a couple of weeks, shortly before her passing:

1. Women are exactly like little children

We are constantly poking, prodding and testing a man, in order to find out what his boundaries are. If he has no boundaries, we will destroy him, especially if he loves us. A man has to have boundaries, and he has to outline them precisely, and he has to force us to adhere to them with the power of his conviction and the power of his action. If he doesn’t do that, we will beat him over the head with his weaknesses (his lack of boundaries) until he breaks.

2. Women put up a false front about virtually everything

Our faces are fake (makeup), our hair is fake (dyed), our boobs are fake (some of us), everything about us is fake. Most especially when it comes to what is inside of us. We lie constantly, because we are far worse, character-wise, than even our closest friends or lovers will ever know, and we desperately fight to keep all of that hidden.

We are looking for our true daddies, basically – the idealized daddies that we never had – somebody who can see through all of our false fronts and call us out on our bullshit and put us in our place. The problem is, those type of men are very few and far between.

3. If a woman ever tells you, “If we don’t have trust, we don’t have anything,” she is either cheating on you or planning to cheat on you

There are no exceptions to this rule. We use that as cover, to try and make the man feel guilty for questioning our fidelity. What we are really saying here, is, “I will fuck whomever I want and you’d better keep your nose out of it or I’ll cut you off from my pussy and I’ll ruin your freaking life if you keep pressing the issue.” If we really cared about you, and if we really weren’t cheating on you or planning to cheat on you, we would tell you something like, “I am not cheating on you, I love you, and I would never do that. I don’t care if we have to stay up all night, for the next week, and go over every single shred of doubt that’s currently troubling you about this. I have nothing to hide, I would never cheat on you, and I don’t want you thinking these things about me. Please tell me exactly why you think I am cheating, point by point, and I will do anything and everything that I have to do to prove to you that I’m not cheating, in order to ease your worried mind.”

4. Women are much hornier than men

Vastly, exponentially, hornier than men. A woman will do just about anything, sexually speaking, so long as she is fairly certain she won’t get caught. For example, we will occasionally go out of town in order to rendezvous with a man we’ve been longing to fuck, and/or to have multiple sex partners in the same evening, and/or at the same time.

This is something that hot women do, most especially. In our minds, it is a natural desire, and a natural thing, and so long as nobody else finds out, it’s “game on”. Women are receptacles for cock, that’s how we have been biologically designed. Nothing feels better to us than being completely filled up with multiple penises, than being the center of sexual attention, than being the object of unbridled group lust. Since it’s something we can’t risk doing on our home turf (don’t shit where you eat), we have to think outside the box, in order to get our boxes completely satisfied. And you might find this shocking, but many women – many, many women – have sex with dogs on a routine basis. This is just one example of how insatiable we truly are.

I can see why you might not believe it, to which I say, look really hard at all of the women you know who have dogs. Look at women who have dogs whenever you see them out on the street, in the act of walking those dogs. Or at the park. You will notice that most of them have male dogs – the vast majority, in fact. This isn’t a coincidence. And look at all the female teachers who are exposed in the media for having sex with underage students. We have no self-control when it comes to sex – or anything else, for that matter. To our way of thinking, losing control is what makes sex great. Doing anything that is taboo is what makes sex great.

5. Women do not have female friends—they have female competition

We lie to our so-called female friends and pretend we are loyal and faithful to them, just like we do with the men in our lives. Secretly, we are jealous of each other, and we want all of the desirable things that other women have—most especially when it comes to our female friends’ things.

And we consider men to be things. If one of our friends has a hot man, we want him to want us. We will do everything we can to seduce him. Not because we really want him—we don’t really want anybody. We do it because we are rarely happy, and we don’t want our girlfriends to be happy, either, and we want to boost our own egos more than anything else.

And after we get him to fuck us, when our girlfriends find out that he has had sex with us, that’s when we finally get what we wanted in the first place. If we break up the previously happy couple, that’s fine, too. It’s all about our pussy, not hers. It’s about winning.

6. Women always lie about the number of sexual partners they’ve had

They also lie about not wanting men with large penises. If we told the actual truth about the number of different men and women we’ve slept with, and if we told the actual truth about our fervent desire for big dicks, our pool of potential suitors would shrink drastically, to the point where it would completely dry up. So we lie. Most often, we will claim that we’ve had between three and eight sexual partners in our lifetime. And, to our way of thinking, it isn’t a lie, because if we had five sexual partners last Saturday evening, and our man asks us how many sexual partners we have had, and we answer, “Five”, well, technically, we aren’t lying.

7. All women dislike themselves

And because we dislike ourselves, we fervently hate any man who doesn’t see through our bullshit. The more a man loves us, the more we hate him. The more he overlooks our sins, and the more he fails to see how corrupt we are, and the more he gives us the benefit of every single doubt – the more we despise him. We will escalate our bad behavior until we finally break him and he wakes up and realizes how worthless we are and what a fool he has been for believing in us.

8. Women want what they can’t have

We want a man whom we can’t have. We want a man who honestly doesn’t give a fuck about us, who doesn’t care if we come or go. That’s the kind of man we will pursue. Call them bad boys or call them whatever you want, that’s the kind of man we want – period. The kind of guy who will make us orgasm, crudely, and give us a huge sexual thrill in the bedroom, and then discard us like used toilet paper, and fuck our female friends afterwards, just because he can. (Just like we would do with his male friends.)

9. All women are masochists

And all hot women are narcissistic masochists. We hate it when things are going well, especially if they continue to go well for long periods of time. We know down deep that we are fucked-up and not worthy of anything that is truly good. So when things are going well in a relationship, we eventually sabotage it. We just can’t help ourselves in this regard.

We could have the greatest, most handsome, most well-hung husband in the world—a one-of-a-kind man who makes all of our girlfriends jealous; we could have the greatest children in the world, who are beautiful, well-behaved and ambitious; we could have the most enviable career imaginable; we could have all of the money and prestige and the truly good things in life, and we could repeatedly tell ourselves over and over, and believe, on the surface, that we would never cheat on our husbands. But down deep we know that it’s a lie. Because one day, we could walk into a grocery store, and some bad boy could whisper just the right combination of words in our ear, and the next thing you know, we’re at the Motel 6 getting it in the ass. That’s just how we are, and any woman—especially a hot woman—who says otherwise, is a liar.

Over the years, my deceased friend’s words have proven to be spot-on, in the vast majority of cases. And if they ring true from your own personal experience as well, then I am more than happy that I shared them with you here today. I know that my deceased friend would be thrilled to know that I have shared this information with the manosphere. After all, she used to be a hottie, and she’s now dead, and by giving me the inside scoop on her female competition, she continues to beat them—she continues to “win”—even from beyond the grave.

Katia_0203 #fundie rr-bb.com

It was a chilly Saturday morning, and Beth was making her way toward the Tundra, the largest open field on her college campus. In fact, nearly all 10000 students were heading there. You see, the first large snowfall of the year had taken place overnight, and today would be the annual Snowball Fight of the Year, or SFY. People scrambled to their "sides", upperclassmen on the left and underclassmen on the right. Beth hurried to her side, finding the excitement in the air infectious. Once everyone was in place, a senior yells: "ONE, TWO, THREE, CHARGE!" At once people grab snowballs and begin lobbing them at each other. Beth laughs, lobbing one across the Tundra.

But her snowball misses its target.

In fact, her target is missing all together.

Beth stands completely still, frozen in shock, staring and the pile of clothes, boots, and gloves sitting on the ground in front of her. She even notices his glasses on the top of the pile. She snaps out of her reverie and looks around her. There were now hundreds if not thousands of little piles of clothes dotting the frozen Tundra. People were screaming, raging and crying. Beth noticed her friend Sarah sobbing uncontrollably, clutching the empty shirt of her fiancee in desperation.

Beth begins to walk in what feels like slow motion, eyes glazed over, in no particular direction. She is still in shock.

She snaps out of it when she notices people jumping into a nearby lake, screaming in rage and hysteria. At first she thinks they are looking for the missing, but soon enough she realizes they are committing suicide, unable to deal with the pain and panic they feel.

Beth turns away, unable to watch any longer. It is then the tears begin to fall, freezing to her face, her breath coming out in short gasps as she sinks to the ground. What is going on? Oh my God WHAT IS GOING ON?! Her analytical mind races, searching for some solution, but it comes up empty.

A girl collapses next to Beth, her body shaking with sobs. Beth recognizes her as one of those "churchy" girls; she hung out with all of those "bible kids", went on there little retreats and went to church on Sundays. Her name is Cassie.

Cassie turns to Beth, her eyes glistening and her chin trembling. "I know what happened."

Beth furrows her brow. "What are you talking about?"

"I know what happened just now, why those people disappeared."

Beth stares in shock, not noticing her jaw drop. "You do? How?"

Cassie drops her eyes, staring at the ground. "My friends told me about it, over and over. I pretended to agree with them, playing my part, being in the club."

"About WHAT?" Beth says, her voice rising.

Cassie pauses and looks into Beth's eyes.

"About the Rapture."

Dave Hodges #conspiracy thecommonsenseshow.com

When retired FBI agent, the now deceased Ted Gunderson, reportedly told a gathering of militia members that the federal government had set up 1,000 internment camps across the country, I had no trouble believing his statement because there is ample documentation to support his statement (e.g. REX 84, Operation Garden Plot and now the NDAA). However, when Gunderson reported that the federal government was storing over 500,000 caskets outside of Atlanta, I also knew he was accurate on this point because Sherrie Wilcox found the evidence in the adjacent photo. However, when I heard that Gunderson was accusing the government of storing 30,000 guillotines, I thought he had lost his mind.

Why Would the Government Want to Store Guillotines?

Gunderson told various patriot groups that the guillotines were being stored for the day that the government declares martial law and moves in to round up and execute American dissenters. Gunderson prophetically told patriot groups that the federal government was going to keep track of all of us. The last statement has indeed proven accurate given the recent Snowden/NSA scandal.

Can somebody please explain to me why the government would need to order 30,000 guillotines? For what legitimate purpose could these tools of execution be utilized?

Off With Their Heads

guillotine 1The guillotine was invented by a Frenchman named Dr. Guillotine. The guillotine reached the height of its popularity when it was mainly used in the French Revolution to eliminate any potential opposition from people with “dangerous ideas.”

The guillotine has never been used inside of the United States. The United States has executed people by firing squad, hanging, the electric chair and lethal injection. The US has never executed a convicted criminal through the use of the guillotine.

Given these facts, then why in God’s good name would this government import 30,000 guillotines as Gunderson claimed? Oh, I know that some of the sheep are now looking up from the ground and have just said “there aren’t are any guillotines in the United States.” Then please tell me, sheep of America, why did Representative Doug Teper, of the Georgia Legislative Assembly (Democrat) introduced a bill which will supplant the method of execution, the electric chair, with the guillotine?

Organ Harvesting?
Doug Teper (D)
Doug Teper (D)

Have you ever heard the allegations which accuse some doctors, primarily in China, of killing patients in order to sell their organs on the black market? After you read the following paragraphs, you may conclude that those rumors are true. When Representative Teper was asked about his motivation to exclusively use the guillotine to execute death row inmates, he said, it would allow for death-row inmates as organ donors. The very spooky Teper further reasoned that the “Blade makes a clean cut and leaves vital organs intact.” I will be happy to let this statement speak for itself. Below is a draft of the legislation.

HB 1274 – Death penalty; guillotine provisions
SECTION 1.
1- 8 The General Assembly finds that while prisoners condemned to
1- 9 death may wish to donate one or more of their organs for
1-10 transplant, any such desire is thwarted by the fact that
1-11 electrocution makes all such organs unsuitable for
1-12 transplant. The intent of the General Assembly in enacting
1-13 this legislation is to provide for a method of execution
1-14 which is compatible with the donation of organs by a
1-15 condemned prisoner.
SECTION 2.
1-16 Article 2 of Chapter 10 of Title 17 of the Official Code of
1-17 Georgia Annotated, relating to the death penalty generally,
1-18 is amended by striking in its entirety Code Section
1-19 17-10-38, relating to death sentences generally, and
1-20 inserting in lieu thereof the following:
1-21 “17-10-38. (Index)
1-22 (a) All persons who have been convicted of a capital
1-23 offense and have had imposed upon them a sentence of death
1-24 shall, at the election of the condemned, suffer such
1-25 punishment either by electrocution or by guillotine. If
1-26 the condemned fails to make an election by the thirtieth
1-27 day preceding the date scheduled for execution, punishment
1-28 shall be by electrocution.
1-29 (b) In all cases in which the defendant is sentenced to be
1-30 electrocuted executed, it shall be the duty of the trial
1-31 judge in passing sentence to direct that the defendant be
-1- (Index)
LC 21 3643
2- 1 delivered to the Department of Corrections for
2- 2 electrocution execution at a state correctional
2- 3 institution designated by the department.”
SECTION 3.
2- 4 Said article is further amended by striking in its entirety
2- 5 Code Section 17-10-44, relating to death chamber apparatus
2- 6 and related matters, and inserting in lieu thereof the
2- 7 following:
2- 8 “17-10-44. (Index)
2- 9 The Department of Corrections shall provide a death
2-10 chamber and all necessary apparatus, machinery, and
2-11 appliances for inflicting the penalty of death by
2-12 electrocution or by guillotine.”

Where would the proposed Georgia Legislature guillotines have come from unless Gunderson was correct in that 15,000 are being stored in Montana and 15,000 are being stored in Georgia?

An Efficient Killing Machine
Has anyone bothered to do the math? A single guillotine reportedly can chop off the heads of about 100 people per hour. In one hour, the federal government has the capacity to execute as many as three million people. In one ten hour day, 30 million people could be executed by way of the guillotine.

Other Alphabet Soup Agents Speak Out
Annie DeRiso and Bill Pawelec
Annie DeRiso and Bill Pawelec

Ted Gunderson is not the only former alphabet soup agent to tell all about guillotines. The late Bill Pawelec, ex-CIA, was a close friend of mine and eventually became the significant other of the News Director for The Common Sense Show, Annie DeRiso. Pawelec told both Annie and I on several occasions that guillotines were being stored on several military bases. The late A.C. Griffith, ex-NSA, said the same on more than one occasion on my talk show. In light of these confirmations from known and from public sources, as well as the proposed legislation of Rep. Teper to introduce the use of guillotines on American soil, I believe that there is no question that the story is true.

Implications
dhs vehicle We already know that the Department of Homeland Security has purchased 2.2 billion rounds of ammunition to go with their purchase of 2700 armored personnel carriers. Do you realize that this is enough ammo to fight a war for about seven years and that there are enough DHS personnel carriers to allocate over 50 per state? Can you imagine if they were concentrated in their distribution patterns? This would be the equivalent of an invading army as DHS goes from house to house and seizes dissidents by the millions and America will soon have their own version of the French Revolution

Since this story broke, I have asked the question why guillotines? I have talked to several of my off-the-record sources and the consensus is frightening. Everyone that I have spoken to agrees that the guillotine is highly efficient. Most everyone I have talked with stated that organ harvesting will indeed be even a bigger business and the guillotine is the most efficient killing machine to that end. Some of my sources stated that the next phase of the transhumanism experiments and developments requires a severed human head to facilitate the mixing of humans and animals into one sentient being. Further, futuristic DARPA robots will have human heads after the initial purge and subsequent executions (see photo below). This makes sense because after the head is severed, the eyes blink and signs of life continue for up to a minute. This would allow a team to “freeze”and to preserve the head for whatever purpose. And just as frightening, I was told that some of Satanic rituals require severed human heads and we know the global elite, in large part, are indeed Satanists.

Can you tell the real person from the DARPA produced robot? Will human looking robots replace human slaves?
Can you tell the real person from the DARPA produced robot? Will human looking robots replace interim human slaves?

I can understand people being skeptical about the guillotines because my first reaction was to reject the notion under my personal veil of cognitive dissonance. Yet, the emerging facts speak for themselves.

Although I did not know Gunderson personally, I did know Bill Pawelec as a close friend and I was well acquainted with Griffith. And even if Pawelec and Griffith were jointly mistaken on this issue, how would one explain away Teper’s efforts to introduce the guillotine into the Georgia justice system?

The end game implications are frightening. When we add the topic of guillotines to what we already know about 2.2 billion rounds of DHS ammo and 2700 armored DHS personnel carriers, why should this be so hard to believe? How can take the fact that DHS has armed to the teeth against Americans and are planning to murder us in horrific ways as anything but a declaration of war?

Be prepared to be shocked as you watch the following chilling report on the possession and intent of the military with regard to the use of guillotines.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujX8evzRXN0

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(Venomkore)

[RageFuel] Female “Introverts” piss me the fuck off

image

1st panel: A boy say “I’m a shy introvert”

2nd panel: A girl says “I’m a shy introvert”

3rd panel: Offscreen figures say to angry-looking boy: “Enjoy being alone”, “Man up fag”, “Fucking creep”, “Loser”

4th panel: Offscreen figures say to happy-looking girl: “Ur so cute lol”, “tfw no shy gf”, “Want to go out?”, “Well, let’s fix that”, “I like shy girls anyway :)”, “It’s OK, want to try and talk?”

this sums it up basically
But actually none of them are fucking introverts they say they are and still do low inhib shit all the time. I basically just play vidya all day. WTF DO THEY THINK BEING AN INTROVERT IS, WATCHING NETFLIX EVERY EVENING??? JFL at this, here is what real introverts are like

image

A father comes home saying “Are ya winning, son?” while his son lays there with blood pouring out of his head, having killed himself

(curryZoomercoomer)

Fact: All the shy and innocent foids are actually the biggest whores.

They just flash strangers on omegle and send snapchat nudes to the latest chad to ask her for them lol

Indeed, there is no such thing as an innocent virgin girl.

(Animecel2D)

They don’t exist. All of them crave attention.

(RemoveNormalfags)

Females are just introvert when no Chad is around.
They become very extrovert when there is a Chad.

(MayorOfKekville)

Foids think they are Introverts™ because they only go out 3 nights a week and wait for chad to make the first move.

(The Incel Decade)

Women can't be introverts any more than they can be Incel. Women are designed to be social.

Even the autists

(Boeuf)

"I'm like, so anxious, I cancelled my rendezvous with chad to sit inside and watch netflix and eat pizza. I'm so lonely like oh my god."
God fucken damn it I want to fucken pierce their heads with a bullet

(Jazavac)

they are all the same, terms like "introvert" are just cosmetic to them. much like make-up, they only use them to attract attention to themselves.

(Arthas93)

Nice read OP, agreed. Foids only call themselves introverts to get attention, specially from Chad. There is no such thing as "introvert foids", it's just an act, an attention grabbing tool.

Like when they say they have "depression". Their depression is not being engaged to a 6' Chad. Foids are showered 24/7 with attention, privileges, gifts, the opposite sex giving them validation and acceptance.

Worthless whores, one day their free ride will end. No good thing lasts forever.

(TheGambler2)

They think staying in and watching netflix some weekends(instead of getting banged by chad at a party) counts as introvert.Imagine being completely friendless autist ldaring at home daily because any social interaction is a failure while society continuously blames you for it

(Atavistic Autist)

image

>asl
feamle 19
>about yourself
i am crazy. i have ass burgers. i am incredibly cool and fun. i hardly shower. sleeping on my bed gives me anxiety so i sleep on the floor next
to it. ive given head to 2 different men multiple times. i scored a 1550 on my sat. i dont have a chair i was held back in 1st grade. im going to
vacation in new york next year. i am a normie.
>interests
adderall and pseudoscience
>looking for
i want to fall in love. i won't fall in love but ill make friends with you and lead you on if youre male or desperate.
>not looking for
sex offenders and aliens
>voice/video
im not stupid like you
>fav movie/vidya
shawshank redemption

A perfect example of a female introvert

le quirky xD

She is actually being tremendously honest due to her autism, and not pretending to be unique at all.

That's what's extraordinary about it. She even admits to her internal contradictions. "Ass burger" but "normie" (because foid), wanting to fall in love but really only leading males on (because they're "desperate"/sub-HSM).

larp

Perhaps, but I wouldn't count on it. Autistic foids tend to be very blatant about their intentions, insanities, and narcissistic personaliteeehees, whereas neurotypical foids are the ones who try to make themselves look better/different than they really are.

The way that you attributed the apparent honesty of an autistic slut to a "not like the other girl" tier LARP is quite ironic. Autistic people are often put under a lens of suspicion for being honest like this, when they're really, truly concealing nothing from the world, JFL.

In the case of autistic men, NTs will suspect them of being psychopathic mass-murderers or rapists or potential school shooters, when it's actually the charming Chad who has the 'bodies in his closet,' likes abusing women, and derives enjoyment from bullying others (and killing their spirits, if nothing else).

Fact: All the shy and innocent foids are actually the biggest whores.

In the case of foids with autism, it's paradoxically because they're more likely to be honest about being sluts, whereas extroverted foids often lie and try to seem of a higher social status.

The inverse of this, I'm sure, is that men with autism are more likely to be honest about being incel, whereas NT men lie more often and say they're Chad-tier.

bound4glory #fundie teens-4-christ.org

Ok so i think we can all agree that the Bible is our final authority on all things? if you agree with that then we should have no problem. so if the Bible is the Final authority on ALL things that includes movies, yes? yes! well in that case Kevin hit the nail on the head when he quoted Psalm 101:3 but lets look at it again for good measure. I will set NO wicked thing before my eyes.... whoa whoa wait a sec read it again... NO WICKED thing. so think about disney any disney show from Beauty and the beast to The little mermaid to The Empror's New Groove... the bible says they are wrong.... why? cause they have wickedness in them. actually ive set a challenge before my youth group to find one movie that has nothing that goes against the Bible (wickedness!) and they cant find one... want to know why? simply because if there is a movie where everyone always acts right and does right it would be boring! if there isnt something that is wrong in it then there is zero plot!

But lets get back to the verse, no wicked thing..... that means NO drinking, NO cussing (zero zip nada!!), NO immodesty (whether on the cartoon character or a real person, modest is modest period), NO rebelloin, NO magic(whether 'good' or bad, whether in a fantisy world or in real life, the Bible doesnt cange in fantasy), NO false religions (that means Sound of Music is out since they promote Catholisim), NO using false versions of the 'bible' (KJV is it for the english speaking people, that kicks out veggie tales)..... ok i think i got the point across.... No wickedness means just that No wickedness, unless of course God made a mistake?

So where is the line we should draw? well God drew it for us, No wickedness and from all I can see that means no movies because they all have something wicked in them. the problem is that we have been so exposed to evil that we are used to it and we dont see wickedness as wicked, instead we see it as cute, fake, or ok... my friends let's back the standard up to God's standard....

elle #fundie shakesville.com

(Submitter's note: Lightly edited to remove references to links)

What if you heard a commercial that used language like this (words in brackets indicate a paraphrase to heighten your suspense!):

There’s nothing good about [ __________ ]. They don’t [engage in beneficial activities]. All they do is [cause a specific problem]. That’s their sole contribution to mankind.

And that’s why, they have to die.

It’s that simple. You cannot rehabilitate [ __________ ]. You have to kill him, his little friends and the [reproductive capacities of “his” community].

What you need is a quick, easy extermination plan. [One simple step] and you’re done. And here’s the really good part: everybody dies!

And while there is joy in all creatures living in harmony, it’s nothing compared to killing [ __________ ]. Now, that’s a rush.

What would you think filled in the blanks? What would you think of the language? What would it remind you of?

Don't worry; this was just the style of a fire-ant-killer commercial I heard yesterday. Still, it bothered me so much that I came home and looked it up to see what the hell was creeping me out.

This commercial is supposed to be funny, but in talking about exterminating fire ants, it relies on language and imagery used throughout history to talk about the extermination of people, as well. Think what you will about my fascination with language and animals-as-stand-ins-for-humans in media, but really, how many pest extermination spots have you heard delve into the intrinsic worthlessness of pests? Annoyance and inconvenience, sure. But no-contribution-to-"mankind?" I don't run across that everyday.

I'm also hearing the commercial in a historical context as well, I suppose. I've talked previously about how media outlets reinforce connections made between people of color, particularly immigrants, and vermin/pests. Late 19th/early 20th century cartoons often portrayed Chinese Americans as living with/eating/making pets of rats and the queues of men of Chinese descent were drawn to look like rats' tails. Another example is the racist comparison of people of Mexican descent to cockroaches. And think about the ways we talk about immigration, in terms of "swarms" and "invasions." [...]

Below is an actual transcription[...]:

There’s nothing good about fire ants. They don’t pollinate your roses, they don’t make cute little sounds when they rub their legs together. All they do is build a big mound in your yard and bite the hell out of anyone who gets near it. That’s their sole contribution to mankind.

And that’s why, they have to die.

It’s that simple. You cannot rehabilitate a fire ant. You have to kill him, his little red friends and that big fat queen down there making more fire ants.

What you need is Orthene Fire Ant Killer from Ortho. You put one tablespoon of Orthene over the mound and you’re done. You don’t even water it in. The worker ants track it back into the mound. And here’s the really good part: everybody dies, even the queen!

And while there is joy in all creatures living in harmony, it’s nothing compared to killing fire ants. Now, that’s a rush.

Orthene Fire Ant Killer from Ortho. Guaranteed to kick fire ant butt.

Now, do I think the Ortho people are operating from the same place as this turn-of-the-century company?

image
(Pictured: an old advertisement depicting a stereotyped Chinese man eating rats)

No. I'm just saying that language matters. Ortho's advertising people might not even be able to pinpoint what made them write the ad in this style, but for me, the cultural influences seemed obvious.

ZippyZoopa #sexist kiwifarms.net

[Context: Infamous Lolcow ADF/Isabel Araujo/Ahuviya Harel/Phil apparently got SRS surgery, this is in a KF thread about a picture of the results 7 weeks post-op. A few other posters show some ignorance, but this guy was the most fundie about it]

Why in society have we come to accept instead of helping people with body dis-morphia through mental stability, instead we give in to these unnatural desires to mutilate their genitals? What is this madness?

[on the next page]
Are you telling me that turning your dick inside out into your guts is not the most natural sounding vagina? What are you a Nazi?

[now a couple pages later a user called NoFeline Says]
Isn't Phil's made out of a piece of his colon? Yeah. Despite how nasty that sounds, it's much less of a horror show than inverting the penis...and the botch-jobs on that are much, much worse.

[To which our fundie says]
Are you so desentizied or "tolerant" that you find inverted your penis and mutilating it NOT botching your fucking body?

[bananaliquerelips says]
unpopular opinion (I guess) but its an okay vagina for a fake one. At first glance it doesn't appear abnormal. upon further inspection, sure, but once anyone gets to 4th base if thats not what they're expecting then they're deluded.

it does look smelly though. douche daily is my advice.

[Zippy responds]
How about not mutilating your genitals because of a mental illness? How about that?

[User Ginger Piglet quotes Zippy]
For people who are TRUE AND HONEST trans, i.e. not Phil, and suffer from actual gender dysphoria, this is the treatment for that illness. However because of its very nature (viz. this thread), that's why they have piles of "gatekeeping" in front of it.

[Zippy posts again]
The treatment is to lead to life that most likely will make your mental state worse than before, look I was liberal and "free-thinking" like you once, but it's common sense that this is in their head. They are the sex they are born with and that will never change.

[GP again]
If you are Phil, or one of the many other transtrenders we cover, yes. However. The trans people that actually put the effort in to pass and go through all the steps and so forth are generally fairly well adjusted.

Basically, if you want to gauge how truly and honestly trans someone is, think about this - how quickly can I clock them? The shorter a time it takes, the more likely they are to screech at some quack until he wolverine-claws a segment out their groin.

[ZZ again, getting more agitated]
You people are insane, you have given these mentally ill people the go through to fuck up their lives forever because you think sex is a social construct. Will someone just nuke the Western world already?

[A moderator named Ravenor shows up, quoting Piglet]
There is also the Kiwi Statistic, we have a disproportionate number of Transpeople involved in the forums who are active and respected members of the community we don't hate transpeople far from it, we just have a distate for people using being Trans as an excuse for doing a runner from responsibility or accountability.

[ZZ again, this time getting sassy with the mod]
Kiwifarms has a disproportionate amount of crazy people? Who woulda thunk?

But yeah to state for the record I don't "hate" trannies, I just think they are insane and they created this disgusting degenerate culture that has even poisoned children. That you can just be whatever sex you want because there was that one time you put on a dress, or you play with boys toys. I hope they get actual help instead of these horrible procedures.

TheDicman #sexist reddit.com

Re: 90% of this cumminity is volcel

You cannot claim incel unless you are actively trying to get a girl or are actively trying to better yourself.

I'm sick and tired of these incels that don't groom themselves/workout and have never even approached a girl, you've never really attempted and wonder why you've never had a girlfriend "b-but Chad gets approached" the only legit male model Chad I know was dysfunctional and too scared of rejection to approach a girl, and he was a KV until 22. David Gandy, didn't have his first gf until 21, because again, he was afraid of rejection.

You don't truly know where you stand unless you ACTIVELY TRY. Even if you've been rejected by 100 different women, you need to keep trying to be incel.

Inaction is voluntary, and thus your celibacy from inaction if voluntary.

Only people that can get away with not trying are people with actual genetic diseases/conditions such as Treacher Collins and cerebral palsy and not just "muh mm of bone" copers.

I’m not going to waste time grooming like some queer. I’m not going to slave at the gym for the CHANCE at some pussy. And I’m not going to approach 10000000 women like some fucking cretinous trog begging for scraps. I’ve worked and went to college for years now, I’m 25, no gf not even any fucking friends. It is OVER, I hate this word but self improvement is a fucking cope, it is. People like me are doomed and nothing short of a miracle will help. I don’t give a shit about your retarded anecdotes.

aCultureWarrior #fundie theologyonline.com

[Story time with aCultureWarrior]

So I'm at the fillin station and see this woman acquaintance and strike up a conversation with her saying how the gas prices have dropped as I speculated that they would so close to the election (are the American people really that stupid that they'd vote for the Marxist again because they're saving a few pennies on gasoline?). She starts talking about watching the debates and how both candidates pretty much said what they thought the people wanted to hear. Her wisdom rapidly went downhill after that.

I told her I was involved in the REJECT R-74 campaign and hundreds and hundreds of signs have been stolen across the state. She wasn't familiar with R-74, so I told her that it was to repeal the current legislation that would allow homosexuals to "marry". She gives me this odd look and talks about how she's in "the THEA-A-TAR" and "has many gay friends and also had two uncles that were gay". She continues to tell me how she hopes her boys grow up open minded and how she would approve of them if one "came out". I told her that marriage is the foundation of society and that it is founded upon Biblical principles. She stated (even though she and her family attend church) that she "didn't agree with everything in the Bible".

Not wanting to be doused by gasoline and set on fire, I held off on comments like "If Uncle Bruce and Uncle Bruce were both adulterers, into incest or bestiality, would you approve of those lifestyles as well?"

Nor did I comment on how she should be careful about allowing her two young boys to be around homosexuals, as they're notorious child molesters.

As far as her views on the Bible go, I would have loved to share this article on "ala carte Christianity" with her, perhaps I'll email it to her.

"We live in a time what could be called “ala carte” Christianity. That is, sometimes you go to a fancier restaurant and the menu will say “ala carte.” You pick and chose those parts of the menu that seem the best for you, those parts that you think you can afford. And so you chose this and this. Well, that is the way that some people feel about the Ten Commandments. They pick and chose those parts of the Ten Commandments that they want to obey. For example, I may like commandments two, three and four but commandments five, six and seven are not so attractive to me. So Christians chose which commandments are important to them..."
http://www.sermonsfromseattle.com/se...ristianity.htm

some incels #sexist incels.co

Re: [Experiment] if when the war againt soycucks, what should we do with foids?

choose their destiny

slave them :chad: Votes: 3 23.1%
go back to a 1800s patriarchy Votes: 6 46.2%
pass a lawn similar to sharia Votes: 2 15.4%
leave foids with all the rights, they have :soy: Votes: 1 7.7%
kill them all Votes: 1 7.7%

(Lubricure)
Femoids should be enslaved in my opinion, but it would mostly be for their benefit in the end. We would surely profit from such an arrangement, but they´re going to gain the most as they will not be able to make the silly choices they do as "Emp0w3r3d Whamen". They would be healthy, happy and loyal like they should be. Lmao, isn´t that ironic?

Hello cucktears.

(FlyFace)
I'm a Patriarchy supporter tbh. Makes sense to only have men who have to fight wars and are eligible for the draft to decide what the politics of the country.. rather then letting Foids vote for gibs to satisfy their late stage Hedonism.

(Tempus Edax Rerum)
Let's just switch roles tbh. They can go out and work all the dangerous jobs, in the freezing rain, go die in the military...while we sip on our pumpkin spice lates in a warn home that our beta provider becky provides us; in our spare time we will call all women pigs and whores, and post pictures of our bums on social media for thousands of likes.

Reloader #racist niggermania.net

I was in the city yesterday on business and went to a new Chinese buffet for lunch. Some of the best food I've ever had too! I was seated in a section with only 4 other tables, all empty. I go up to the buffet and fill my plate and when I get to my table there's another table being seated, with 3 niggers. Oh that's just great. I sit and notice one of the sows staring at me. Not just a glance, but a glaring scowl.

I eat and every time I look up I see it staring at me. I get finished with the plate and go up to get another. Here comes the staring sow to the buffet, staring at me still! I get back to my seat and sit in another chair, with my back too their table.

As the sow walks past me she stares even harder. I am seriously concerned now, is this thing in attack mode or something? And here I sit now with my back to it. I finished up and left as soon as I could. Nigger ruined lunch for me. They ruin everything else, so why not lunch!

goydivision #sexist #psycho incels.co

[LifeFuel] Roastie from my school gets nudes leaked and ropes

It’s a classic story.

Roastie cheated on her Tyrone bf with her Chad friend, under the pretense that she was hanging out with her friends.

Based Tyrone then leaks her nudes to the school, and also exposes her Chad “friend”. Long story short, roastie becomes bullied to the point which she cuts her wrists and dies. Tyrone gets expelled but not after getting 1 kill.

It’s an old story which has been repeated countless times, but it never ceases to make me laugh every time it reoccurs.

inb4 pedos ask for n00ds, i actually have never seen them (being low status incel), but I know people who have. And whether they exist or not, she’s dead anyways. Mission accomplished. Who cares how they did it, they got it done.

Honestly the thing that baffles me is why they still do it. Literally almost every roastie who’s sent nudes to Chad ends up having them leaked and ruining her life. Not that I mind, but you’d think they’d be slightly less retarded.

Do you really think foids have the ability to think logically?

Good point.

wow! In the age where you can take a screenshot of anything and easily share it to anyone, anywhere within seconds, sending a nude means it might be shared with others!

Damn... it’s almost like... actions have consequences.

lauren Rosa #conspiracy truthuncensored.net

Extortion 17~ An exclusive interview: Angela Turner from ‘TruthUncensored.net’ / ‘Prepare To Take America Back’ met Charles Strange, a tireless crusader in search of answers into the death of his son American Hero Navy SEAL Michael Strange, in Washington DC during Operation American Spring in May 2014.

Charles tears up when he tells of the last 3 years and how he and his wife Mary along with the other parents of the SEAL Team 6 have made getting to the truth the of their son’s murders a full time job. Answers to questions such as who set up the ambush, and did our own government murder the infamous heroes to silence them.

In an All-American Catholic family from Philly, Michael Strange grew up the oldest of four. Michael was a son, brother, uncle and American hero, who on August 6th, 2011 made the ultimate sacrifice for our country he loved. Charles Strange described his son to be not big in stature while growing up, but full of fire and would never give up. He often defended friends that were picked on or bullied. All traits that would eventually make him the leader of the Elite SEAL Team 6 that were unfortunately made notorious due to breach of confidentiality by Vice President Joe Biden for killing Osama Bin Laden.

article-2340686-1A49D6E2000005DC-302_634x564

Exclusive Interview with Charles Strange by Angela Turner:

I spoke with Charles on Sunday, May 25 as he graciously agreed to an exclusive interview with TruthUncensored.net / Prepare to Take America Back. I asked him how he was doing, and he replied not well as his son’s birthday was near, June 7th. Imagine the heart wrenching pain and burden of losing your son. Now imagine he is murdered in a clear set-up and your own government refuses to give you answers and all facts point to treasonous murder and cover-up.

It’s been 3 years since Michael came home for his birthday after his Elite Team Seal 6 had killed Osama Bin Laden. Charles describes his son’s last visit home as Michael acting different and worried about his will. He quoted Michael as saying “You cannot believe what is happening in our country.” Other of his team seal brothers also reportedly told their families that they were being targeted and worried about not only their safety but the safety of their families. 93 days after the raid on the Bin Laden compound, August 6, 2011, an outdated Chinook helicopter carrying thirty-eight men, including twenty-five of the elite SEAL Team 6 and Army Reserve, and eight Afghan commandos was shot down over Taliban-controlled territory in eastern Afghanistan.

In our interview, Charles Strange told me about when he met Barack Obama in Dover Air Force Base as they were bringing home the bodies of our fallen soldiers that “Barack Hussein Obama came up to me and he put his hands on my shoulders. And he said, ‘Michael changed the way America lived.’”

10428589_10201833878473578_3335431255895231141_n

“And I grabbed Barack Hussein Obama by the f—— shoulders, I grabbed him and I said, ‘I don’t need to know about my son. I need to know what happened to my son.’

Obama would later be quoted as saying that these deaths and the deaths in Benghazi were phony scandals. Another slap in the face to our fallen heroes and their families by this treasonous administration.

Here are the events and circumstances surrounding the treasonous deaths of our hero soldiers which has become known as Extortion 17 as told to me by Charles Strange. The conspiracy and cover-up that will chill you to the bone:

EXTORTION 17: THE CONSPIRACY AND COVER-UP

Charles Strange was told that his son had been cremated without his permission as his son’s body had been badly burned in the helicopter crash. In asking for the official report of the night he was inadvertently sent a disk with a picture of the helicopter which was intact. And in this picture was his son’s body clearly recognizable and not burned. Charles said it also appeared he was holding his gun which breaks his heart to know he needed help and he couldn’t help him. When questioning high ranking officials they were more concerned about how he had attained the picture than answering why Michael was cremated and why they lied about their death.

The families of the fallen were told that the black box had been washed away in a flash flood.

Obama’s Rules of Engagement are a death sentence to our military and on August 6th they were unable to clear the area as his rules clearly state that our troops have to withhold from shooting until there is evidence of hostile action and fired upon.

The families were told that a drone strike would have easily taken out the Taliban so when asked why one was not used, Obama’s three-star Admiral, Robert Harward, explained with no emotion or conscience that a drone strike or similar was not used because, “we need to win their hearts and minds of our enemy.” So winning the hearts of the Taliban enemy was more important than the life of Michael Strange and his brave comrades.

SEAL Team 6, National Guard, and Army Reserve were packed into a decrepit 1960s Chinook used in Vietnam. Special operations were always conducted in MH-47 helicopter that the SEAL Team 6 exclusively trained in. And never were there that many special operations personnel packed into a single helicopter as they were always split up into small groups with multiple MH-47s. So why were they all together?

There were 100 Taliban waiting for them on the ground in a clear ambush.

Seven Afghan commandos on the flight suddenly were replaced just before takeoff and are not listed in the flight manifest. Family members have yet to receive answers as to who these people were.

Obama had an Islamic prayer said over the bodies in a ceremony in Afghanistan before they were brought home. This prayer condemns infidels to Hell.

The operation was highly unusual and suspicious. The U.S. military never sends in a reactionary force, much less a force comprised of elite units like SEAL Team 6 to apprehend Taliban fighters. When Brigadier General Jeffrey Colt was interviewed, he characterized the mission as unprecedented or extremely rare.
Three years later the parents of our fallen heroes continue to mourn and search for answers. Please share Michael’s story in order to hold the CORRUPT OBAMA REGIME responsible and accountable and DEMAND ANSWERS. Did they kill our men to cover up events of the killing of Osama Bin Laden which has been questioned and was highly publicized for Obama’s reelection? Or did Obama offer them up in trade in order to appease the enemy?

Responsibility2nd #fundie freerepublic.com

Honestly I don’t care what people do in the privacy of their homes.

The mantra of a liberal. It applies to drugs, porn, abortion, queer-sex and a whole host of other liberal agendas.If you don't care what they do in the privacy of their own homes, then don't complain when they take their disgusting and perverted habits into the streets. And our schools. And don't complain when your business gets shut down by the State simply because you refused to bake a wedding cake for Adam and Steve. And it all begins at home.

No, my friend. What they do in the privacy of their own home is our business.

tyrindor #fundie mmo-champion.com

Some people need to remember many 13 year olds nowadays look 18 with the way they dress and do their makeup. I agree with his sentencing to some extent... Yes, 41 and 13 is beyond sick, but hear me out. This happens a lot... young teenagers wanting sex with someone older, more experienced, or just for bragging rights. They egg them on and many men cave under the pressure. Yes, they are adults and should know between right and wrong however everyone has moments of weakness especially when it comes to sex. However, no matter how you put it they simply didn't rape them.

Why is it that someone get the same sentence for:
1) 41 year old flat out raping a 13 year old.
2) 41 year old having sex with a 13 year old that wanted too.

Your talking about 2 totally different animals here. Both should be punished, I fully agree, but no where near the same. The first should be 10+ years in a maximum security prison, the second should be more around 1-2 years in a minimum security correctional facility... and if/when they do it again charge them with some jail time.

As for girls that are 16-17 and totally lie to older men about their age, I feel the guy should get off with a warning at most. They aren't kids, they knew what they were doing. 16-17 is old enough to be charged as an adult so why is it considered a kid when it comes to sex? The law shouldn't be gray like this, either 16-17 is an adult or it isn't.

She's a minor. She can't consent. Its statutory rape.
]
How can a minor not consent to something? Do you really think people under 18 have the brains of a new born baby? Even a pet can consent to something. 16-17 year olds are charged as adults for murder, even 15 in some rare cases, yet if you have mutual sex with one you go to jail for statutory rape because "they couldn't consent".

The law is totally wrong here. It contradicts itself. Not to mention legal age is much lower in some other countries, and no one seems to have problems with it there. It was also much lower in America hundreds of years ago. It wasn't uncommon for a 13-14 year old to have kid(s), and raise them. It still isn't uncommon in some countries. Yet.. some people believe nowadays a 13 year old can't even consent to something?


May I remind people that some developed nations such as Japan has the age of consent of 13?

Yeah, and it's still freaking creepy. Unless you are saying you want the age of consent changed in UK, which I think I read you don't, is really a moot point.

The age of consent is pretty high in America. When I was 15 I started dating a 12 year old, and no it wasn't a sexual relationship at that age. It was my first girlfriend ever and we were friends for 2 years before that. Shortly after I turned 16, making our age gap 4 years, but then she'd turn 13 about a month later. No one had any problems with it, not even her parents because they knew I was a good guy.

Then 2 years went by and we were still seeing each other. The day I turned 18 she was 14, turning 15 in a month. A few days after my 18th birthday her parents all a sudden did not approve of the relationship because it was now illegal according to law. We broke up, I haven't seen her in 8 years.. and it still depresses me to this day.

Why does a once legal relationship become illegal simply because we BOTH got older? Not only was she my GF, but she was my best friend. I cared greatly for her, but according to society the relationship was all a sudden wrong over night. After my experience I will never support the current age of consent laws.

Anne Kennedy #fundie patheos.com

(=Part two of Anne Kennedy's Glenn Doyle Melton rant=)

So yesterday I got through half my thought. To recap, Glenn Doyle Melton recently announced on Facebook that in the wake of finally separating from her husband, she entered into a romantic relationship with another woman. Yesterday I began to answer the question What is love? Insisting, rather lamely, now that I go back and look at it, that self love is not really “love” in a true sense. But in this brave new world self love is the hope and the dream.

Of course, I’ve used the word “love” without really defining it. So let me do that now.

Love in our modern context means something like having powerful lovely feelings for something, someone, or oneself.

Love, however, in a biblical context is the verb used to articulate the nature of God who is One in Being, but Three in Person. God Is Love because the Father eternally pours himself out for the Son who eternally pours himself out for the Father. And so also the Spirit. The three live in a perfect unity of the giving of the self without holding anything back. That is a very different thing than, “what the world needs — in order to grow, in order to relax, in order to find peace, in order to become brave — is to watch one woman at a time live her truth without asking for permission or offering explanation.” Glennon’s articulated self love, so usefully insulated from the world’s criticism, being grounded solely in the rebellious and sin poisoned human soul is of necessity narrow and hard.

Whereas God’s love gives life to the world. As I like to say to my Sunday school children about Jesus, “He didn’t hold anything back from you. He gave his whole life, down to the last drop of blood. Not a single bit of who he was did he guard or keep away from you. How else can we talk about his body being something that we eat, his blood something that we drink?” This is the basis upon which any human being can give anything to any other human being.

If you are busy loving yourself you can only take, you can only demand. And so let’s look at what is demanded of the children in this picture. “They have the love and support of their dad, me, their grandparents, their aunts and uncles, their church, their teachers, their friends’ families –all of whom have fallen as hard for Abby as they have. They’re lucky kids, to be surrounded by so much love. We have family dinners together – all six of us — and Abby cooks. (She is an AMAZING chef because Jesus loves me). We go to the kids’ school parties together. We are a modern, beautiful family. Our children are loved. So loved. And because of all of that love, they are brave.”

Glennon is claiming a multiplication of love. Look, more people to love you. Me, your dad, his new person, my person, your grandparents. We are all here together with love. And we go to the parties together and everyone is completely happy.

And yet, because this has been a business of taking for the self, rather than self giving through death, there cannot really be happiness, in the ultimate sense. I would put cash down that these children have been cut to the heart by the father’s betrayal of the mother, and now the mother’s of the father.

Why? Because marriage is a picture of Christ and his Church. Jesus, who lived in the perfection of self giving love in the Godhead as the eternal Son, set that aside to come and gather us back into that perfect love. He set aside glory and honor and beauty to come and die as the ultimate act of Love. He gained, in his death, a bride, the church. Every marriage is a shadowy retelling of the triumph of the cross. And so each time a marriage fails, that retelling is spoiled. And the whole world feels it, knows it at the core, however much we may lie and say it is good. And the people who know it most are the children, the product of that troubled retelling. Multiplying “love” when something so essential is broken is not really “love”.

Really what the children have learned is that father can’t keep his promises and mother can’t keep hers. Each time a promise is broken “love” apparently abounds. Whereas, that’s just not true. Every time a promise is broken the love that Christ has for his church is lied about. And lying doesn’t really produce happiness. It produces misery and anger.

If lying produced happiness, humanity would be peachy happy and love love love. But we are liars by nature, determined to call good evil and evil good. And observe the roiling anger, the bitterness, the unbending intolerance of individual people for other individual people, the racism, the violence. Where is all the happiness? Where is all the love? It isn’t in the hard defiant gaze of Glennon Doyle Melton. It isn’t in the collective heart of a culture that hates God and loves the self.

As I implored yesterday, prayer is of the essence. But also Christians should cling tightly to the surpassing love of God that sets aside the self, dies to the self, abandons the self, holds nothing in reserve to grasp onto the one who is perishing. His blood and love is sufficient for every grief, every brokenness, every lie.

Anne Kennedy #fundie patheos.com

(=First of a two part post/rant about Glennon Doyle Melton, a Christian blogger/author who came out as a lesbian and married a woman=)

I mentioned in our podcast yesterday the tragic downfall of Glennon Doyle Melton. I would like to point out a few obvious home truths. Incidentally, of course it would be nice to think nuanced and fascinating thoughts, to grasp at difficult insights that have not been articulated by others, to, in short, be Novel. But this point in Christian history doesn’t seem to be calling for that sort of thinking. We seem to be needing to go back to the most basic point, the expression of the most essential truths. And the most essential of all of them is...

What is love?

This foundation of Christian doctrine has been so muddled and twisted, squandered really, by the modern Westerner, that we have to keep going back to the very beginning point of Christian Faith in order to answer this tragic confusion.

So Glennon, like so many, got married, had some children, and found herself in the usual way of coping with a too difficult life, a broken relationship with herself, and a cheating husband. In the midst of this, she turned out to be a top notch writer and so wrote her way through her difficulties and troubles. Here she has my complete sympathy. I am sitting here at this very minute in desperate pursuit of mental health through writing. Writing is my life line. If I don’t write every day, I become unhinged. And gosh, isn’t it nice if people read your writing? Everyone has been reading Glennon. That I haven’t is my own fault. I need to get out more and read more. I’ve read a few of her blog posts, though, and they are breezy, brilliant. The writing is what you Want when you click on the Internet.

But good writing does not a theologian nor a Christian make. Any one of us can put ourselves out there but the church–the people who know and love God and his Son Jesus Christ through the power of the Holy Spirit of whatever denomination and background–have a duty, an obligation, to articulate the gospel clearly and repudiate those who call themselves Christian but do not adhere to basic Christian doctrine. For the sake of Glennon herself, because she has claimed the name of Christ, I find I must say no to her new way of life.

Let’s just quickly look at what she says about love, both for herself, and more troublingly, for her children. She writes, “I want you to grow so comfortable in your own being, your own skin, your own knowing – that you become more interested in your own joy and freedom and integrity than in what others think about you. That you remember that you only live once, that this is not a dress rehearsal and so you must BE who you are. I want you to refuse to betray yourself. Not just for you. For ALL OF US. Because what the world needs — in order to grow, in order to relax, in order to find peace, in order to become brave — is to watch one woman at a time live her truth without asking for permission or offering explanation.”

And about her children, “They have the love and support of their dad, me, their grandparents, their aunts and uncles, their church, their teachers, their friends’ families –all of whom have fallen as hard for Abby as they have. They’re lucky kids, to be surrounded by so much love. We have family dinners together – all six of us — and Abby cooks. (She is an AMAZING chef because Jesus loves me). We go to the kids’ school parties together. We are a modern, beautiful family. Our children are loved. So loved. And because of all of that love, they are brave.”

You can find the longer post on her Facebook page.

Let me begin by saying that throwing over your broken marriage to join with another woman isn’t actually brave any more. It’s one of the easiest choices on the table. It may not feel easy in the moment, but what you are doing is embracing a copy of yourself, and you are doing it with the culture’s complete approbation. Bravery is when you do something difficult that ought to be done but you don’t want to do it, but you do it against your desires, for the sake of another. The choice of Glennon to be with a woman is the choice to go with self expression and the love of the self over the love of another and of God.

And that’s the confusion, isn’t it? It’s everywhere. In Christianity you are called to die to yourself, to die to the very essential nature of who you are which has been so corrupted and marred by sin that it is irrevocably bound to eternal death. This is the state of the human person. Not a single human person escapes the sentence of death that came when we chose to love ourselves rather than the Other, that is God. And however painful it is to face, no one gets a pass on this sentence. We all go down the grave one by one, dust to dust, because we idolatrously chose to love ourselves rather than our Creator.

No amount of embracing the self will cure the ills of the soul. No Amount. There is nothing you can do to love yourself enough to rescue your soul from death. You can’t. There is no human solution to the death dealing cavern that separates us from God.

That is why God himself had to cross over that cavern by himself. He had to come and absorb our sin and our rejection of him in himself. That is the cross. He took our catastrophic and poisonous self love onto himself and died the death we should have died.

When we cling to him, the death we endure, though it feels very great, is actually very small. Still, it is not easy to say no to the self, to put to death that essential poisoned self. It can’t happen without God himself carrying you through to eternity.

And I really hate to say it, but this is going to have to be part one, because I have somewhere to be. But I will pick up right here tomorrow, and will probably have another part after that. I hope you who know and love Jesus will pray for Glennon and her children and her husband and her new person and plead with God to enlighten the eyes of her heart that she might finally see him for who he is. See you tomorrow!

AryaStark #racist stormfront.org

A while back, I was part of a co-ed recreational volleyball team that was all white. Most of the guys were taken, except for this one cute guy that I liked. One of the girls on my team invited an Asian girl onto the team. Immediately, that Asian and the cute guy start hitting it off, and by the end of the season, they were dating.

Anyone else have a story like this? Why do we let Asian women into our social circles when their sole purpose is to steal our men? I'm not sure whether I should be mad at the guy who went after the woman, the Asian, or the girl that brought her onto the team!

I see them everywhere now - they're always on the news as part of an Asian - white pairing. I see them in commercials with a white man, as part of a couple, and even in movies. Seriously, why are we letting them into our media, as if they were white? Just today, I saw an Asian woman with her halfbreed child walking across the street, I wanted to run them over

One of them who thinks I'm her friend even told me that she prefers white men, then I asked her why, and she said she finds white men more attractive. They know that whites are genetically superior, they know that we're the more attractive race, they know that they are inferior, so they purposely target white men, so their children don't have to look like them! But the most ridiculous thing is, I have one friend who is tall, successful and cute and he says he only dates Asians! I ask him why, and says he doesn't even know why, just his preference, "like hair colour"! I'm thinking it's because Asian women are easier than white women, who have some self respect and racial pride. (for good reason I might add)

I live in British Columbia, Canada, and it seems as half the white guys are taken by Asian women. There's no black people here, so it's definitely not the case of white women selling out. I'm not sure what we can do about this unfortunately

Earth Angel #conspiracy abovetopsecret.com

[This whole post is a must-read. After stating the face on Mars is depicted as a lion, drawing parallels pondering whether the Sphinx is really a lion-human hybrid, and contemplating why lions appear frequently alongside Biblical characters such as Jesus and Judas]

Anyway THE LION PEOPLE RACE REALLY DO EXIST

Yes some of you are probably laughing.....well so did I when i read the section in The hand book for light workers" I pmsl in fact and said what a load of cow dung

Anyway roughly a year later i had a really odd experience. I was lucid dreaming, i had never experienced it before. I went on a journey out of this world through vortexes stargates, i felt like i was in a stargate tv programme. I ended up in a pyramid and walked down to an alter. A golden being entered from mid air on a huge flying throne it landed, and she moved elegantly towards me almost dancing. She was tall, thin, with a long neck and a bauld head. The being whirrled around me as if she had never seen a human before, i was just as intreged by her.

After this dream type state i came too, but I knew there was something about what happened to me, I couldn't put my finger on it.

The next day my friend Trevour came to see me. As he departed this earth over ten years ago in a road accident, this is more complex than you probably first realised. [...]

back to Trevour, he said "a friend wants to meet you but he has asked me to ask you first because you will need to be prepared to meet him as he is not like me" I asked what he meant and Trev replied "He is a Lion Person" I cautiously agreed to meet this Lion Person, curiosity got the better of me, not believing in them and all!

The young Lion person stepped forward and introduced himself as Kootie! He looked warrior like in a long red robe, he explained he was responsible for my Lucid dreaming experience as a way of introducing himself so it wasn't too much of a shock!

I will admit now,I was scared, I had never encountered another being, spirit people form our spirit world yes. I took me a couple of weeks to get used to Kootie, I nearly had a few panic attacks!

Anyway I have recieved several messages and it appears his main aim is to RE-REVEAL THE REVALATIONS

Now I have read theories about aliens being demonic and connected to satan. But as Lion's appear side by side with Jesus I am inclined to trust my new friend. As it is late I wont be sharing any messages tonite but I will share what I have so far and maybe some of you can even help us as I am in the Uk with a baby to take care of It is difficult for me to get to peru and North Africa as well as Chakara in India. If you can we will have to team up!