Similar posts

ChuckMonk #fundie forums.catholic.com

No. I’m saying the alleged victims here kept their mouths shut for years rather than risk something. This is revealing for two reasons. One, they thought Harvey Wienstien had the power to completely destroy their career (or worse) regardless of any rape charge. Two, who was it they were afraid of? Mean old conservatives? Fox news? Brietbart?

Nope. They were scared of the feminists, the leftist media, and Hollywood progressives. Very interesting how that works.

The Republic of El Salvador #fundie #sexist washingtonpost.com

A Salvadoran woman charged in the death of her stillborn baby was cleared Monday, a ruling advocates say is a notable triumph in a country with one of the world’s most severe abortion bans.

A judge’s decision to acquit 21-year-old Evelyn Hernández marks the culmination of a tragic saga that began when she was raped at the age of 18, her lawyers said. Those close to Hernández say she didn’t know she was nearly 34 weeks pregnant in 2016, when she walked into a latrine and delivered a stillborn child. Her mother found her, bleeding and unconscious, before rushing her to a hospital.

Paula Avila Guillen, director of Latin America Initiatives at the Women’s Equality Center, said a doctor concluded that Hernández’s condition was a result of an “incomplete abortion.” Police discovered her fetus in the latrine and charged Hernández with aggravated homicide. In 2017, she was handed a 30-year prison sentence.

“Mere suspicion of possible abortion immediately makes [women] guilty, presumption of innocence gets erased,” said Guillen, who worked closely with Hernández’s defense team. “When police were notified, they shackled her to a hospital bed and interrogated her.”

[Women serving decades-long prison terms for abortion in El Salvador hope change is coming]

Hernández spent 33 months in prison and was released in February after a successful appeal. In an attempt to retry Hernández on the same charges, prosecutors last week fought to increase her sentence to 40 years, arguing that she had lied about being raped and should have known she was pregnant.

The woman bled frequently and faced other obstetric ailments during her pregnancy, Guillen said, which she confused with her period.

The judge “simply couldn’t see enough evidence to be convinced she had done anything to commit any crimes,” Guillen said. “It was the right thing to do.”

Several Latin American countries have stringent abortion laws, including Argentina, where an 11-year-old rape victim was forced to give birth in February, even though the girl had repeatedly asked for an abortion. But no restriction is more severe than El Salvador’s absolute ban, which has been in place since the late 1990s and applies even if a mother’s life is in danger.

Guillen and other advocates say the ban is applied arbitrarily and specifically targets poor women in El Salvador who lack access to quality medical care. Even in instances of miscarriage, prosecutors in the country seek homicide or manslaughter charges on top of abortion-related counts.

Hernández’s case was remedied only after a painstaking process, and Guillen notes that this was just the second time a judge in the country has ruled that a stillbirth or miscarriage was not criminal. About 20 women remain imprisoned under similar circumstances, Guillen said.

But slowly, some of them have had their charges commuted or dismissed.

In December, Imelda Cortez was released after spending about 18 months in prison for attempted murder. She also gave birth to a baby in a latrine, but the infant survived, and prosecutors argued that she hid her pregnancy and was negligent. Cortez contended she was a rape victim and did not know she was pregnant.

Four months later, three Salvadoran women charged with aggravated homicide after suffering miscarriages had their sentences commuted. They’d spent a collective 29 years in prison.

“The stories are all so similar because they all follow a pattern of persecution of women who have stillbirths and are impoverished,” Guillien said. “You have to mobilize the world to save one woman; that’s what it takes in El Salvador."

Morena Herrera, an prominent advocate for women’s rights in the country, said in a statement that Hernández’s acquittal “is a sign of hope for all women who remain in jail for crimes they did not commit, for health problems that should have never been brought to court."

“It is a hope for Salvadoran society because we are beginning to take steps along the path of justice, of truth and of well-being for everyone,” Herrera added. “No woman should go through the ordeal that Evelyn did.”

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Alt-left Male Rapist Dresses as Cartoon Characters to Rape Boys"

The enemy is desperate to spread the spirit of immorality. It's time to start calling it what it is. That spirit isn't spreading fast enough for the enemy so he has grown men raping boys, a traumatic event, that could affect them for the rest of their lives, but Lord forbid. I pray God deals swiftly with those who rape children. Please agree with me as NO child should have to deal with that.

(Fox News story follows)

A Pennsylvania man who dressed as Mickey Mouse and Elmo for children’s parties is accused of sexually abusing five boys, officials said.

The Delaware County District Attorney’s Office announced the arrest of Michael Cripps, 43, of Colwyn, Pa. on Monday. Cripps, who was charged with sexually assaulting five male victims.

The allegations date back seven years.

Delaware County District Attorney Jack Whelan said authorities were concerned the allegations were the “tip of the iceberg.”

“Make no mistake, this is a very serious child predator,” Whelan said Monday at a news conference, FOX29 reported.

"He exploits these young boys. He sexually molests these young boys. He ruins these young boys lives," Whelan continued.

Cripps shouted "nope" when asked if he was guilty while he was led from the courthouse.

Whelan said Cripps ran a business, M.C. Parties, where he would dress as characters such as SpongeBob SquarePants. The district attorney said there was no evidence he met any of his victims through his business.

However, Whelan said Cripps targeted single or divorced women with young boys and volunteered to babysit. The alleged assaults took place at 14 addresses in East Lansdowne, Aldan, Lansdowne, Upper Darby, Colwyn and Darby, Philly.com reported. The arrest affidavit stated Cripps lived or resided at 13 addresses in Delaware County, Philadelphia and Chester Counties, from 1998 to 2012, Philly.com reported.

Whelan said the first sexual assault allegation made against Cripps was in 2012 but the office was not able to file charges due to a lack of evidence. Cripps was also being prosecuted by the Delaware County District Attorney’s Office for a string of robberies.

A child-abuse hotline alleged “four boys, ages 8 to 17, were compelled to sleep in the same bed with Cripps on numerous occasions,” Philly.com reported. Cripps would reportedly become furious if the boys tried to refuse or resist his advances.

On Sept. 18, a male between the ages of 18 and 25 told the district attorney’s office Cripps reportedly sexually assaulted him and his brothers who were ages 8 and 7 at the time, the arrest affidavit stated. Around the same time, detectives were also investigating another sexual assault claim made against Cripps involving a 5-year-old boy. On Oct. 24, detectives interviewed a 17-year-old boy who also accused Cripps of molesting him when he was younger.

Cripps was arrested twice, in 2003 and 2006, for sexual assault but the charges were removed.

Cripps was being held on $250,000 bail at the George W. Hill Correctional Facility and awaits preliminary hearings.

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified. Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

Bob Gray Sr #fundie solvechurchproblems.com

THE WEAPON OF ACCUSATION

In recent days we have seen those who oppose Christian values use a very potent weapon against those who stand for what is right. It is a weapon that has been used since the beginning of time. It is a weapon Satan mastered and taught throughout the ages. It was first used in the garden of Eden against God. It has continued to be used throughout history. The Bible tells us that a sign of the times is the increase of the use of this weapon. What is the weapon you ask? It is a powerful weapon of accusation.

In our political arenas we have watched as the liberals have used accusation over and over again in an attempt to discredit an individual with whom they disagree. In recent days we have seen it used against politicians, Supreme Court nominees, and others who stand for conservative principles. Unfortunately we have also seen it used among preachers and Christians. Many an individual has been damaged permanently by an accusation that has been made against them. Political contests have been determined by accusation which were made. Nominees for positions in the president’s cabinet have been altered because of accusation. Accusation can literally alter the course of history.

In the Garden of Eden Satan began his attack on God by accusing him of not telling the complete truth. Joseph was placed into prison and stripped of his position because of an accusation. Our Saviour was hung on the cross to be crucified because of those who accused Him.

You may have noticed that I did not preface the word accusation with the word false. We often only deal with the subject of false accusation rather than the entire subject of accusation. I contend that accusation does not have to be false to be unjust. There are times when a true accusation is handled in an unjust manner. All accusation must be handled properly whether it be true or whether it be false. I am going to attempt in this article to lay some groundwork on how we deal with accusation.

1. Accusation must never stand alone. Please follow that statement carefully. Accusation must always be accompanied by several things.

It must be accompanied with the proper presentation. The Bible clearly tells us that we are not to bring an accusation against an elder. The presentation of accusation should not be in the public forum. Accusation should be presented in the proper fashion.
It must be given to the proper person. When we accuse someone publicly we are not looking for justice as much as we are looking to influence opinion. A public accusation does not fix a problem. A public accusation creates a problem because it changes public opinion without justice being carried out. We must only accuse to the proper authority or person who is responsible for finding truth behind the accusation.

It must be accompanied by evidence. Evidence alone is not enough. The evidence must be handled properly. Criminals have been judged innocent not because they did not commit the crime but because of the mishandling of evidence. Justice carefully takes into consideration the evidence and how it is gained and presented.

It must be with two or more witnesses. An accusation by one person does not guarantee a person’s guilt. A lone accuser is not enough to judge guilt or innocence. Interesting that Biblically the accuser was put on trial not the accused. The credibility of the accuser was of paramount importance according to God.

Accusation must not stand alone. All of these must accompany accusation to avoid injustice from being done.

2. Accusation should not be assumed as true. There was a day when we all believed that a person was innocent until proven guilty. We are now living in a society where guilt is assumed until innocence is proven. A person’s reputation is destroyed because we assume them to be guilty based upon what seems to be a credible accusation. In some cases we assume it to be true even if the evidence is by an unreliable witness. We seem to like assuming guilt. It is wrong to accept accusation as truth.

3. The accuser should be on trial as much as the accused. This is critical. People who have been accused are often times judged while the person who accuse them is allowed to freely make the accusation without scrutiny. When an accusation is made the first person that should be scrutinized is not the one accused. It should be the one who made the accusation. What was their motive for making this accusation? What was their agenda in making this accusation? Did they make the accusation to the proper person in the proper manner? These are questions we should be asking when someone accuses.

4. Public accusation should never be considered reliable. A person who makes a public accusation almost always has an ulterior motive. It is foolish to believe that someone who would use accusation to destroy a person’s reputation should be trusted. I am not saying that the accusation may or may not be true. I am saying that once it has been made into a public accusation we should reject it because of the reason the person made the accusation. Public accusations should ALWAYS be considered suspect. Do not receive public accusation.

5. We should not allow a person’s reputation to be changed by accusation. Someone who has done much good is accused and suddenly we think bad of them. We don’t know the facts. We don’t know the reason they were accused. We know nothing other than what we have heard. To change our opinion of the one being accused merely because there is an accusation made is foolhardy. It is unwise. Joseph was not guilty, but he was accused and his reputation was damaged. Christ was not guilty, but the mob cried for him to be crucified because of accusation. When someone is accused do not think the worst of them.

6. Do not be the judge or the jury when you hear of an accusation made. In fact, don’t be the private investigator either. May I just simply put it this way? Mind your own business. If it’s not your business to carry out justice then keep your nose out of it. You are doing no one a favor by deciding that you are going to be the one who investigates the person who has been accused. Do not make a judgment unless it is your area of judgment.

7. Defend the accused. This is not popular, but it is the right thing to do. A person who has been accused should be defended until they have been proven guilty. Tragically we are cowards when it comes to this. Someone with whom we have had a friendship with for years is accused and we get as far away from them as we can to protect ourselves. What a cowardly way to behave. Stand by your friends when they are accused. I would rather be wrong in defending an accused friend, than to be right in having attack them before knowing the truth.

8. Apply Philippians 4:8 to all accusation. It commands us, “Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.” Most accusation would not stand up to that criteria so therefore we should not even entertain it in our thoughts. One reason to avoid receiving accusation is the danger of allowing your mind to think on the wrong things.

9. Never Never NEVER spread accusation. If you spread accusation you are as guilty as Satan of accusing one of your brethren. Satan is the accuser…not just the false accuser. He is the accuser of the brethren. Sometimes he is telling the truth but his accusations are never in the interest of justice, but in impeding the righteousness of God.

10. Identify yourself with the accused. This is one that I wish every Christian would follow. I would rather be identified with someone who has been accused than someone who is guilty of being an accuser. I run to the side of the accused. I identify myself with the accused. Christ was accused and I identify myself with him. In our lives we are all going to be accused by those who have an ulterior motive. We will wish that someone had run to our side when that happens to us.

Satan is using accusation more today than ever before. It is tragic how many reputations are damaged because of this weapon. May God give us good sense and wisdom to understand the danger of accusation and to handle it with care.

Frankie Lee #fundie wnd.com

[On Jonathan Cahn now that his shemitah predictions have failed]

Cahn preached sound doctrines.Any Christian who had God's Spirit in him/her would bear the same witness.Needless to say,those who opposed him and his messages,is definitely coming from the Dark side,having souls darkened,void of the spirit of God,perhaps twice dead,and these Nay Sayers were reserved to be slaughtered.

The Kingdom of Christ,is distinct,and there is a line cannot be blurred.

These Critics were not afraid of prophets of God,neither can they keep their big mouths shut,and couldn't help themselves but just jump into conclusion,and quick to cast suspicions and smears,to attack man of God,poison them.Anyone simply hating their brethren abides in death.But these brute Beasts had no qualms to offend God,and God''s servants,and they had gone deeper than hate.They bear false witness,and made distortions.

We bore witness that he is a prophet of God,and they say otherwise.It cannot be mistaken,either one among us is making Deceits.THERE IS NO TWO WAYS ABOUT IT.

One of us,is an Evil doer,had Iniquities,would hear the words of Jesus soon...I NEVER KNEW YOU,DEPART FROM ME YOU WHO DID SINS.EVIL DOERS.LAWLESSNESS.

One fact.One opposer said that, because Johnathan spoke from scriptures,from God''s Words,therefore he is no prophet.

Precisely,one who spoke from Scriptures is God's Prophet,and that is attested by all Christians.God's prophet must believe in the scriptures,teach from scriptures,and that is the true test of a Prophet also.A Christian first,then he might be called to be a prophet.

David J. Stewart #fundie #sexist jesusisprecious.org

You know, what Harvest Baptist Church on Guam has done to me reminds me of an eerie episode of The Twilight Zone. A man had planned ahead, by building a nuclear survival shelter under his home. He had told all his neighbours about it, but they all mocked and laughed at him for years. But then one evening on the news, it was reported that Russia was about to launch a massive nuclear strike against the United States! The man took his wife and children and locked themselves into the underground bunker shelter. His neighbours came by the droves, begging to be let in. When the man kindly explained that there was only enough room and supplies for his own family, his neighbours became threatening and violent. They started trying to find ways to break in. They brought power tools, and made all kinds of threats, terrorizing the poor man and his family. At the end of The Twilight Zone episode, right about when his neighbours had found a way to murder the man and his family if they didn't cooperate, the news announced that the threat had been false, and all was back to normal. The man's neighbour's tried to go back to THE WAY IT WAS, acting normal, but there was no way that family could ever look at their neighbours the same again!

That is how I feel with the horrible way Harvest Baptist Church has abused and mistreated me all these long years since 2014. Their ungodly pastors just threw me under the bus, like I wasn't a person anymore. They knew exactly where I lived, and my hurting situation, being all alone in life. One of their reprobate assistant Pastors, Jared, even mocked me, making fun of me for being alone. He said was sarcasm: “How's your belief's working out for your social life?” I went home and cried. That little man is a cold-hearted bastard with no business being in any ministry. These ungodly pastors at Harvest see no problem using two dozen different Bible versions in church. They see no harm in Calvinism, otherwise they wouldn't promote Satanic preachers like Pastor MacArthur (the modern godfather of Lordship Salvation). Thank God Jared quit and left Guam. Sadly, he's ruining lives elsewhere now! I am a good judge of character, and I know a selfish person when I meet one! Harvest is full of selfish people, especially among their pastors and staff. It's the Richy Rich club! Harvest loves their trips to Israel. I wish they'd stay there and not come back, and do the island a favor!

I have said oftentimes that I would make things up to Harvest if they ever invited me back, and simply give me a second chance; but they have ignored me, playing stupid games, and I have no patience for games, nor the ability to read their minds. All I know is that NONE of my Harvest neighbours will have anything to do with me. They just selfishly go about their lives, as if I don't exist, knowing that I have no church to attend, and they are okay with that. So what does that say about all of them at Harvest? It says they are wicked people, who parasite off of Christianity for a paycheck, and don't give a damn about THE TRUTH, nor do they give a damn about hurting people like me, who has reached out to them numerous times for their love, help and friendship. They are real bastards! If you don't like that word, then stop reading and go away. I am writing my articles the way I think God wants me to write them, from my heart!

Going back to my illustration of the man with the underground nuclear shelter, if Harvest ever did invite me back, I think it just wouldn't be the same, after they have shunned, ignored, ostracized and avoided me AS A GROUP. But I figure if they can let go of everything, so can I. It was the darndest thing last year. I mean, one week I have A GROUP of my Harvest neighbours all waving at me. I was so happy. I don't know what the hell they were doing. I waved back as earnestly as I could to let them know I AM HERE AND NOT UPSET AT YOU! I waited for an invitation to church, but one never came, so I quickly got frustrated. Next thing I know, AS A GROUP they totally reject me again—they won't even look at me, and they pretend like I am not a human being. Well fuddrucker them! That's Greek for a$$holes! I am praying about moving, possibly to Pensacola, Florida or somewhere in Texas. I am also considering taking a trip to Asia to search for a wife. I am tired of being alone. Pastor Jack Hyles is right that American women are spoiled brats who only want a man to use as a tool to get a house, money and children, but they don't want A MAN. Even worse, many young women nowadays are pursuing careers and don't won't to get married. And they talk about MGTOW (men going their own way). As far as I can tell, American women are GOING THEIR OWN WAY, and men are scared to marry them!

image

Image: A black and white photo that is labelled “Harvest Baptist Church on Guam Cult”, and has “We only care about our own; David J. Stewart is not welcome!” and “Truth-tellers are not welcome!” written below the label. The photograph consists of eight children with glowing eyes and some have the numeral “666” etched on their foreheads. The phrases that the children are saying consists of “Aren’t we supposed to love others?”, “Why am I not being friendly anymore?”, “Me too, I won’t wave either.”, “Okay, I will ignore him.”, “Isn’t this hatred?”, “Sure, be just like the pastors.”, “Can I be a big a$$hole too?” and “Nobody talk to David Stewart, we don’t like him!” Written on the children’s torsos are the phrases “My Baptist church stinks!”, “Harvest promotes Calvinism, which is Another Gospel”, “Who cares?”, “Harvest is ecumenical”, “Harvest is uncaring!”, “Harvest are selfish jerks!” and “Harvest uses dozens of fake Bible versions”

It disturbs me when I see cult behavior in a church. When my neighbours synchronize for or against me, on cue from their pastors and staff, that is a Satanic cult. Harvest Baptist Church on Guam are just as guilty as dictator Kim Jong-un in North Korea, where people are not allowed to know the truth, because everything is censored. For telling THE TRUTH that the modern Alexandrian based Bible revisions are corrupt, I have been banned and blackballed by Harvest Baptist Church since 2014. I'll never shut up! I'm not the bad guy, Kim Jong-un and Harvest Baptist Church are, for defending their errors and trying to keep people IN THE DARK! Harvest's pastors and staff have much blood on their hands!

gendercritfem and others #transphobia reddit.com

From /r/"two"xchromosomes: TIM gets excited by forcing other women to change around him, "cuddling" with them at the afterparty. Classic AGP sleepover fantasy.

image

Ah, yes, it's the "small little everyday things", like ogling women in dressing rooms. Oh, I'm sorry, did I say women? I forgot, they're "girls".

“At the end of the night another bridesmaid and I were so exhausted that we slept on each other basically cuddling at the after party.”

You felt up an unconscious woman.

“It was just something girl friends do. All these things are just those small things that all my life I've felt I've been missing out on because of my situation.”

Nope, as a woman, I can assure you that I've never groped any of my unconscious friends before. In fact, it seems like people in your situation tend to do this more than actual women...

“For one of the first times in my life I finally was able to feel like who I really am”

A creep? A sexual harasser?

“a woman.”

Fuck you.

@CallaAETHIOPICA

Me either. I hug my friends for sure, but we aren’t constantly cuddling or even holding hands. TIMs have such weird views about women.

@gendercritfem

This just in: heterosexual men view women primarily through the lens of their sexuality.

More on this breaking story tonight at 10:00.

@ringsofsaturnine

And women find this hard to report, because they're told that if they feel uncomfortable with it, or speak out about it, they're transphobic bigots. Rapists never stop looking for loopholes, and this identity politics shit is their holy grail of loopholes.

@gendercritfem

Yeah, it's really Kafkaesque how a subculture of cross-dressing homosexuals has gotten hijacked by a bunch of straight male predators, and we now have to take them seriously as a political movement.

@Didush

In their endless quest for validation, they absolutely HAVE to push their way into every female space. They've found their way into places like r/tallgirls, r/makeupaddiction, and even fucking r/PCOS (!!!!!). But there's no greater irony than seeing XY men post in a sub called twoxchromosomes. It would be hilarious if it weren't for the fact that people apparently are so willing to concede these spaces to them, which is kinda disturbing

@gendercritfem

The worst is on the lesbian subs, where they're super concentrated because, as it turns out, there are a lot more guys who are into women than there are women.

Also, lmao at them going on PCOS. Yeah, if a TIM ever gets ovarian cysts, I'll consider him fully welcome there, but I'll be thoroughly impressed.

@__Lannister__

I literally just saw a comment the other day in the main lesbian sub made by a TIM saying that lesbians are welcome there. It pissed me off and made me peak again. OF COURSE I BELONG HERE IN A SUB NAMED AFTER ME - an actual lesbian. It's everyone else that doesn't belong there! It was like a house guest eating my cereal telling me I'm welcome to eat my cereal. No shit you fucking freak.

@ringsofsaturnine

They're fucking settler colonialists of gender. You invite them in as a guest, and they shit on your floor and when you complain, kick you out of your own house. And steal your name and start pretending they're you and you never even lived there, never mind existed.

@gendercritfem

Oh dear, I'm just trying to imagine the dread and horror every woman in that sub must feel at the prospect of being compared to a TIM. Imagine how horrified and disgusted they must feel to be told that yes, the worst insults they've ever heard are right, and they really are just the same as a man.

@Iittlewolfie

I just read that post, fuckin barf. So many handmaidens going “Thank you wow our struggles are so similar 💖”, saying he’s a “goddess”.

Libfem women bow down to TIMs. They can’t help themselves. Doing so satisfies their savior complex. It makes them feel good about themselves to go “yaaas queen we are exactly the same”. Same navel-gazing nonsense as always. Not only does it make them look selfless and caring, but they also get to placate men. It’s obvious that even though many women say they see transwomen as exactly the same as us because it’s the nice thing to do, we don’t.

Libfem women don’t treat TIMs like women. They treat TIMs like special men.

@ringsofsaturnine

But how do you know they have XY??? Do you karyotype every person you meet??? Do you know your own karyotype??? No? So Trans. Women. Are. Women. Repeat after me. And talking about chromosomes is literal violence. There are no differences between women, you cisnormative transphobic TERF. /s

npx190 #conspiracy facepunch.com

[In response to user "Patall" who started a debate thread regarding the existence of intelligent extraterrestrial life]

Patall, observing what appears to be your first post, with all due respect, how do I know your actually from this Earth, and not from some far away Council taking a survey to see if Earth would be accepting to extra-terrestrial presence?

But in all seriousness, I kind of feel like some places that keep their mouths shut are hiding something, take the Apple corporation for example, and how their technical innovators seem to have shrunk stuff down in size a lot. The original ipod was real fat, but only had 1gb, then they kept on shrinking it in size, yet it grew internally, and with better quality. They did not teach me the names of those who came up with that engineering, and such a fast rate of engineering within a decade's time, really raised my suspicions of how some of this stuff has become a reality.

I doubt everyone is who they say they are, they may look human, but maybe aren't. I have seen some real good fake human skin get made in the movie industry and what not, to know its not too hard to walk around as a fake human, where no one seems to notice you. Although, I really would like to know how these unexplained air-crafts go undetected to the radars, and can immediately jump from the ground and accelerate 0-60 seconds in the sky, and at such higher rates of speed.

Matt Slick #fundie carm.org

A man from the congregation, with a huge Bible that had gold pages, was somehow designated to speak to me specifically and to teach me about Jesus so I could receive Him as savior. At this point, we were all kneeling at the front of the church, beneath the pulpit, and each potential convert had been matched to a congregation member. I scoffed under my breath as mine began to recite scripture and blab some religious mumbo-jumbo that I seriously tried to ignore. I wanted desperately to leave.

Then, unexpectedly, a woman about ten feet from me who had also come forward, started to cry. She cried with such depth and feeling that I was shocked. It was weird. This fanatical display was not what I wanted to be a part of, so I just focused on getting through it so I could leave.

Then someone else began to cry the same way and another. I wanted out!

By now, I was nervous. I wasn't sure what to do or to expect, so I looked at the man I had been ignoring and decided to listen to him for just a second and then I'd continue to ignore him. All the while I was wondering how to get out of there. But, in that moment where I paid attention, he asked, "So, do you want to receive Jesus as your Savior?"

Now, I am not the "jump on the band-wagon" kind of a guy, not at all. I wasn't going to fall into this emotional hype sweeping through the church. So, I decided to focus and think logically. I examined this man. I remember very clearly looking at him. He seemed normal enough. Then a thought occurred to me. I realized that this situation might be important and I didn't want to simply scoff at it and ignore it. Maybe there was something to this God stuff. After all, I don't know everything. So, I thought about the options: If I choose God and He is there, I win. If He is not there, it doesn't matter. If He is there and I don't choose Him, I lose. Logically, I should give God a try. It made sense.

I knew that if God was real that I should, at least, manifest some form of sincerity even if it wasn't much. I figured that being flippant with God, if He were real, wouldn't be a good idea. It wouldn't hurt to try and be sincere and these people in the church seemed to have some common purpose and identity. It was, to say the least, interesting. So, I quickly addressed a prayer to God (not knowing if He was there) and said, "God, if you're there, then I'll try and be sincere and accept you. If you're not there, it won't cost me anything."

I looked at the man and said, "Yes."

"Good," he said. "Let's pray," and he led me in the sinner's prayer.

As I started to pray, I tried to manifest a sincere and honest heart. I was "giving God a chance." I followed the man's lead and I began to confess my "sins" to God and to ask Jesus to forgive me... everything was fine until something completely unexpected happened.

(I want to interject something here. I make no claims to being "spiritual" or "special" in any way. But, what follows is what really happened. And please remember that I have never been able to adequately convey the "experience" side of what happened in my soul that night. It is difficult to adequately describe. So, please bear with me.)

As I concluded my prayer, I became aware that someone "other" was there. Someone else was in the room with us and His attention was focused on me. This someone was not a member of that congregation. But I felt His presence dawning like a sunrise. This person was making Himself known to me in my heart. I somehow knew it was God. It was the Holy Spirit. He came to me slowly, gently, and then in a sudden movement, His Holiness overshadowed me with greatness and I became incapacitated. It was indescribable. He permeated my heart, mind, and soul. He washed over me in a burst of holiness and I was utterly undone. His incredibly deep purity shone upon my soul and I was instantaneously made aware of my utter sinfulness before a Holy and Righteous God. It was a supernatural experience of profound and utter depth. It wasn't emotionalism. It wasn't being psyched-out. It was God. I was in the presence of God Himself. I was in the presence of Perfect Holiness....and I knew it!!!

From the very deepest part of my soul, I felt a powerfully new and profound remorse for my sins, for offending God, for being unclean. I was a sinner! My body could not help but let loose a flood of tears of sorrow and guilt. I wept hard. I wept from the depths of my soul in guttural, heaving, moans of confession and brokenness. I was in the presence of incredible Purity, Holiness, and Love.. I was encountering God Himself. and I was a sinner. I could hardly stand to be in the presence of such deeply pure perfection and holiness. It was out of balance and I was profoundly aware of the disparity.

So, there I was, on the ground, sobbing like I've never wept in my life. I was a sinner and I knew it. The Holy Lord had revealed Himself to me and the natural result was to realize my own sinfulness. I kept sobbing and heaving out tears upon the floor. They came like a flood. And then.

This may seem unbelievable, but the only way I can explain it is that Jesus Himself manifested right there next to me. He had come to meet me on my knees. It wasn't as though I could see Him or touch Him. But, He was there. I was aware of His Holy awesome holy presence next to me. It was incredible. It was wonderful and I felt my heart enveloped and lifted by Him. His concern for me was precious and tender. It was marvelous. He enveloped me in His love, His holiness, and His awesome greatness. I knew He was there to forgive me. I knew He loved me. I basked in His presence. I was with Jesus.

Then, while I was kneeling there, utterly absorbed and drifting in the experience of His presence, He moved. He moved toward me and gently entered my heart. Instantly, I physically felt my sin leave me. I felt the sudden and wonderful burst of forgiveness wash over my soul. I was instantly cleansed and born again and with it came the most profound and absolute sense of security of salvation I had ever known. My salvation was in Him. I was forgiven and safe for ever.

Then, He gently lifted His marvelous presence from me. He let me breathe again, think again, and regain my composure. It took a while, but I was finally able to recover and eventually able to stand up. But I was not the same. God had touched me and I was forever changed. I was so ecstatic. My heart was overflowing with excitement, love, hope, intensity, and great joy. I was smiling so hard, that my cheeks were hurting and I couldn't stop. It was great.

Eivind Berge #fundie eivindberge.blogspot.hr

Beware of sex-negative MRAs
A casual observer might get the impression that the Men's Rights Movement is growing, since there clearly are more self-identified MRAs now than ever. But actually, most of this growth sadly consists of a cheerleading chorus for the feminist sex abuse industry rather than any real antifeminism.

There is a deep schism in the MRM between sex-positive and sex-negative MRAs which is well illustrated by how Angry Harry is now treated at A Voice for Men. Angry Harry is a venerable old MRA, a founding father of the movement, and for him to be ostracized like that just for being eminently reasonable is a travesty.

AVfM purports to be an MRA site but is actually a cesspool of feminist filth, where they worship radical feminists like TyphonBlue. She is a particularly nasty promoter of the feminist sex abuse industry including the lie that women are equally culpable for sex offenses. TyphonBlue is so extreme and clueless in her feminist thinking that she even attributes my former rage over celibacy to "processing (badly) some sort of overwhelming sexual trauma from his past." In the feminist worldview, sexual abuse is the only explanation for every perceived problem, and any man who disagrees with feminist abuse definitions must have been abused himself and is in denial.

TyphonBlue, the AVfM crowd and other feminists have a special poster boy for female-on-male "rape" in the former marine James Landrith. I always felt James Landrith was one of the most unsavory characters on the entire Internet, as his advocacy for the expansion of rape law has disgusted me for many years now. Even if he were telling the truth, it is patently absurd to take his sob story of female sexual coercion seriously as rape. The story inspires jealousy in normal men instead of sympathy and Landrith is a hypersensitive outlier to be traumatized by whatever experience he had. Angry Harry says so himself,
Furthermore, even if these particular memories were 100% correct, it seemed very unlikely to me that a 'normal' man would be so traumatised - and remain traumatised even 20 years later - by the incidents described in his article. So, as I said, I groaned inwardly, being somewhat depressed at the thought that false memories and/or 'particularly sensitive' victims were invading one of my comfort zones in cyberspace.
Now it turns out this feminist poster boy is exposed as not only a preposterously sensitive moron but a fraud as well. Angry Harry has caught James Landrith carefully changing his story and relying on recovered memories just like any other feminist accuser of the most untrustworthy kind. Now Landrith even claims, based on memories recovered in therapy, that the woman spiked his drink before "raping" him, making the feminist melodrama complete.

I myself called out the female sex-offender charade several years ago. To me, nothing screams bullshit as loudly as claims of sexual abuse by women. I have emphatically stated that women cannot rape men nor sexually abuse boys. I regard it as crucially important for MRAs to make it perfectly clear that we do not acknowledge female sex offenders even in principle. It was clear to me from the beginning that the female sex-offender charade only serves to promote feminist sex laws that ultimately hurt men immeasurably more than it can help a few rare particularly sensitive outliers who are traumatized by female sexual coercion (if they even exist). It is unreasonable to make laws based on hysterical outliers, and most importantly, the laws they want correspond exactly to the most hateful feminist sex laws which hurt innocent men every day. Therefore, I cannot emphasize enough that anyone supporting the female sex-offender charade is not a true MRA. This is a very good test to separate the wheat from the chaff -- ask how someone feels about female sex offenders, and if they respond that male victims of women are marginalized and female sex offenders need to be prosecuted more vigorously (or at all), then they are most certainly not one of us.

The word for such people is feminist or mangina. And now I've got some bonus advice for manginas: If you want to be sex-negative, then there are ways to go about it without catering to the feminist abuse industry and without advertising how stupid you are. For someone brought up in a feminist milieu this might be difficult to grasp, but guess what -- there are ways to prohibit and punish undesirable sexual activity without defining it as "abuse" of some helpless "victim." Traditional moralists have done so for millennia. One example is Islamic sharia law. Another is traditional Christianity and our laws against adultery, fornication, sodomy and so on in place until recently. Even obscenity can be dealt with on grounds of morality rather than the hateful and ludicrous persecution of "child porn" we have now, where teenagers are criminalized as sex offenders for sharing "abuse" pictures of themselves. A blanket ban on obscenity such as in the old days would be infinitely better and more fair than this charade. I don't agree with the sex-hostility of traditional morality either, but at least it isn't as retarded as the false-flag MRAs who apply feminist sex abuse theory to males. So if you want to be taken seriously, it would serve you better to advocate for traditional moralist values and laws instead of the feminist sex-abuse nonsense.

When a boy gets lucky with an older woman such as a teacher, quit insisting he was "raped" or "abused," because sexual abuse is not what is going on here. Forcing these relationships into a framework of "rape" or "sexual abuse" designed for women only serves to showcase your lack of intelligence and ignorance of human sexuality. It is also not needed in order to proscribe such behavior if you really believe it needs to be a criminal matter. You can punish the woman (or both) for fornication and/or adultery if you insist on being so sex-hostile. No victimology is needed! No denying the boy got lucky and ludicrously attempting to define him as a "victim." No sucking up to the feminists and no display of extreme imbecility on your part.

I can't really argue with moralism, because it basically consists of preferences about what kind of society you'd like to live in or claims about the will of some deity. It is not in the realm of rationality, so beyond simply agreeing or disagreeing, there isn't all that much to say. But when you make claims about abuse and victimhood like the feminists do, those claims can be tested because they bear relation to the real world and human nature, which is what science is about. Thus scientific methods such as is employed by evolutionary psychology can greatly illuminate the nature of rape and sexual abuse, and whether women can be perpetrators, and it can easily be shown that feminist jurisprudence makes thoroughly unscientific claims. Feminist sex law is neither based on evidence, rationality nor morality and should not be taken seriously. It is mere pseudoscience concocted to justify an ulterior motive. If you still insist on it, you are left with pure absurdity, as is easily demonstrated by a simple thought experiment.

Feminist sex abuse is so arbitrarily defined that if you are blindfolded and transported to a random jurisdiction where you meet a nubile young woman, you would have to consult the wise feminists in the local legislature before knowing if you can feel attracted to her without being an abuser (or even a "pedophile" if you are utterly brainwashed). And if you see a romantic couple, you similarly cannot know if the younger one is being "raped" without consulting the feminists you admire so much. That's how much faith manginas place in feminists -- they allow them to rule their most intimate desires and defer to them unquestioningly. Manginas are feminist sycophants and the MRM is now full of them in places like AVfM, The Spearhead, and the Men's Rights subreddit.

What is going on is this. The manginas are so steeped in feminist propaganda that the only tool in their intellectual toolbox is "abuse." And so in Western countries, even conservatives and religious fanatics (barring Islamists) will only ever argue that any type of sexual activity needs to be banned because it constitutes "abuse." Old concepts of sin or crimes against nature/God have been almost entirely supplanted by the feminist sex "abuse" paradigm. In terms of "abuse" is now the sole means available to conceptualize anything you disapprove of regarding sexuality, so everyone, including devoutly religious people, jumps on the bandwagon and promotes the politically correct abuse industry. Even prostitution is now to be legislated exclusively in terms of sexual exploitation or "trafficking" of (mostly) women -- traditional morality does not enter into it and of course all whores are themselves only innocent victims while the johns are the abusers. Feminists and manginas simply cannot help themselves because they know no other morality after a lifetime of being exposed to feminist propaganda. Feminist theory is so pervasive, any alternative is literally unthinkable for liberals and conservatives alike these days. This is how you get the bizarre charade of putting women on trial for "raping" willing and eager 17-year-old boys. Prosecuting female sex offenders is the most comical and perverse legal charade in history, yet false-flag MRAs support it along with the feminists because they have been that well indoctrinated with feminism. Brainwashing really works. Last night I got a comment from a true believer which well illustrates the profoundly obtuse mindset of a male feminist:
if he says no, it is rape. if he is forced, it is rape. if he is under the legal age, it is rape and child molestation. plain and simple. same laws for all...and if women want to enjoy the privileges of modern society, they must be held accountable under the same laws and to the same degree.
Such blind devotion to feminist sex law is the hallmark of a mangina. They neither comprehend that men and women are different, nor do they see anything wrong with these hateful sex laws when applied to men either. Instead they unflinchingly support equal injustice for all. We real MRAs need to denounce these fools. Don't be led on by these impostors who claim to be on men's side while promoting the very worst aspects of feminism. Rest assured that real MRAs are not like that and we do exist. The real MRM will trudge on despite our depressingly small size at the moment.

Patrick T #racist christianforums.com

You sure do. Btw did you ever see anyone cry at the collosseum? Or at Maya ruins? Nope. Same thing. I wasn´t there. I don´t know said person not personal so any shown "sadness" is pure for show and memoria folcloristic.

I visited Buchenwald. I was as touched as i was at the local bus station.

Oboehner #fundie christiannews.net

"Please explain what conditioning has occurred that would result in a 6-year old boy having a crush on a girl?"

Does a 6 year old really even know what a crush is? Seriously? All they need then is some queer to encourage them to be gay, then what began as an innocent friendship would be perverted.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

Notice that the eyelids (including eyes) are one of a temptress's greatest weapon. Although seemingly innocent enough, the way that a woman looks at a man says it all. The same holds true for a man. A lustful gaze with wandering eyes that undress women, can permanently ruin a friendship, lead to adultery or much contempt and shame. Indeed, Marilyn Monroe led millions of sinful men to their spiritual death and doom. She has been the ruin of many, and her house is the way to Hell. Joe DiMaggio had every right to be angry and upset over his wife casting her pearl before the swine (or perhaps she was the swine). Satanism is synonymous with violence, torture, sexual immorality, cruelty, mass-killings, nudity and death. America is truly a 100% satanic nation!!!

Amos Moses #fundie disqus.com


Amos Moses:
if they are trannies ..... then they were BORN THAT WAY according to you ...... and if they are homosexual or lesbians ..... THEY WERE BORN THAT WAY according to you ..... and they CANNOT CHANGE according to you ...... so the same STANDARD YOU APPLY ..... applies to PEDOPHILES ........... and it is only YOUR OPINION it is abuse ...... its pretty basic .........

Enniscorthy:
It saddens me greatly that you are advocating for the systemic sexual abuse of children. I thought you were a Christian. I will always fight to protect a child from a sexual abuser. A child's rights far outweigh another person's desire for sexual abuse.

Amos Moses:
No, no, no, no, no ........ YOU have set a STANDARD that LOGICALLY includes PEDOPHILES ...... YOUR STANDARD ...... and i am trying to get you to see YOUR ERROR .........

Enniscorthy:
Well, I am sitting here saying that under no circumstance would I allow an adult to sexually abuse a child, and you're screaming at me that yes I would. Clearly you don't know what my standard is when you keep telling me the very opposite of what I'm stating. I don't know why you elect to ignore that a child is not party to what the adult does to him or her and that it's somehow okay just because we don't want to be politically correct. In fact, NO ONE feels that way, so you're not just misrepresenting me but practically everyone else out there. No one cares what a pedophile's attractions are. A child must be protected. And no one argues that because it's pretty clear and obvious.
This is why we don't compare homosexuality to pedophilia. If two grown adults are attracted, there's no reason to tell them what they are doing is wrong. Not a single one. But pedophilia is an act of abuse on a child who cannot consent. I'm surprised you have to have this explained to you.

Amos Moses:
but if homosexuals are BORN THAT WAY and it is INNATE ..... and TRANNIES are also BORN THAT WAY and it is INNATE ...... then the same STANDARD YOU SET APPLIES to PEDOPHILES ......... or WHY NOT ...............

Enniscorthy:
This is too, too delicious for words. You accused me of a strawman recently without knowing what it really means. Now I'm going to tell you something: YOU are guilty of a strawman argument.
You keep sitting here telling me that I'm a hypocrite to be OK with homsexuality but not pedophilia when both are innate. The reason that's a strawman is THAT IS NOT WHAT I SAID, and certainly not what I ever meant either.
If somebody's actions, no matter how innate they are, cause a child to be physically and emotionally damaged because of an act of non-consensual abuse, they I will stand against them. That's always been my "standard", not the one you keep INSISTING is my standard and I never never once claimed. "Innate" is NOT my argument, it's the one you keep TELLING me is my argument. And "born that way", which again I never said and don't even particularly believe.
So the reason I'm OK with homosexuality but not pedophilia is because in one situation an innocent party is abused, and in the other, no one is abused. It is consensual. THAT is my argument, informed consent, not whether it's INNATE.

Amos Moses:
NOPE .... it is applying the STANDARD you have set for SEXUALITY ...... and if it changes or not ...... and how DARE YOU tell a PEDOPHILE he or she has to go through a "sexless life" ............ to not have sex with a person he or she loves ..... who do you think you are ...... /sarc off ....... and there is a DIFFERENCE between a strawman argument and SARCASM to ridicule your position ............

Enniscorthy:
Here you are again, telling me the "standard I have set for sexuality." If it's my so-called "standard", why don't you tell me where or when I ever said it? Once again, reading what you've written here, it sounds very much like you're putting the rights of a pedophile over the child they choose to abuse. Are you doing this to make fun of my position, because once again, that ISN'T my position. I say protect the child at all costs and have always said that. The pedophile's attractions (not love, as you said) are irrelevant if a child gets hurt. Whether strawman or sarcasm (and you've used both), you are deliberately misrepresenting my standards, and my position and my beliefs.

love-shy.com FAQ #fundie love-shy.com

[Love-shy.com FAQ on the friendzone]
Love-shys are sensitive people. They can get very enamored with those they fall for, but tragically, the objects of their affection don't usually like them back. Love-shys are often treated with the phrases "oh, you're such a nice guy, but I don't see you that way," or "sorry, I have a boyfriend" or the classic "I wouldn't want to ruin our friendship." The unaware, naive guy will stay stuck to the girl as a satellite, or "friend" if you will, in the vain hope that she will change her mind. Meanwhile, the girl has several relationships with other guys, and relays her sob stories to the friendzoned guy while giving him no sex.
So, what to do about friendzoning? Well, there's an entire forum on this site devoted to help, but if you believe you're in this predicament, we're going to give you one piece of advice right here: Break your "friendship" off now! You will only suffer more emotional devastation and hardship in the long run. Do not pander any more to the girl, do not do extra, unwarranted things for her, in fact, it is best to cut off all contact with the girl and move on. Above all else, do not not not listen to the advice out there that the girl might "change her mind!" There's a 99% chance she won't and you'll be stuck in the cold while you could have been eyeing other prospects.
Friendzoning is good for no one, really. It ruins the friendzoned guy, teaches the friendzoning girl that she can always have bootlickers serve her in return for nothing, and harms society by making it seem like love-shys are these bootlicking pushovers who don't deserve respect. Do not give a girl unwarranted reward treatment! She has enough friends to yap about how bad her boyfriend is behind his back.
The important thing to understand is that the friendzone is an abusive relationship for both parties involved, but it hurts the friendzoned guy worse, because he gets nothing out of it. If a girl turns you down, it will always hurt, no matter what. But you must move on or else even more humiliation. This is problematic in an environment where there is a scarcity of options, which encourages this behavior, but you must avoid this behvior, no matter how bad it feels or how scarce your options are.
[Bolding from original]

soulartemis #sexist incels.co

Back when I was in high school there was this girl I really liked, she was my friend and I asked her out. She said that she was flattered but "didn't want to ruin our friendship," "was too mentally unstable to be in a relationship right now," etc. etc. I said OK and remained hopeful for the future. because we were close friends we talked a lot about teenage romance, etc and eventually the conversation got to sexual fantasies. she told me some of hers, i told her some of mine. she suddenly cut off our friendship without explanation and blocked me on facebook, ghosted me irl, etc.

next month she's fingering her new girlfriend on the back staircase after school while simultaneously cheating on her with a chadlite who mogs me, and she also told many people that I was "creepy" and "weird" for having made an advance toward her and telling her my fantasies. word had got around that i was harassing her, even when she was the first to ask me about my fantasies and what turned me on. she got a lot of attention and sympathy from mutual friends who had only heard her side of the story. fucking LOL!

Femoids will make endless excuses to avoid a relationship with you and call you "creepy" while also being a degenerate and unfaithful whore with douchebags who mog you because that's what their vag wants. Hell, they'd rather fuck another girl than an incel. They'll turn around and blame you for being "creepy" while getting down and dirty with Stacey and Chad behind your back. There is nothing more evil on this planet than the female species.

pictures of her below because she is a degenerate whore. she's 18 i know she looks much younger. she publicly posts pictures of her clothed pussy on instagram. she also shaved her head while starving for Chad attention and ended up looking like shit. after all, that's what she is.

thekidintheback #fundie reddit.com

I get that there is a natural aversion factor, but I don’t see the point of taking it out on gays. They literally can not help being gay, its largely determined by hormones in the womb.

Lol degeneracy and hedonistic lust is a lifestyle choice, not hereditary you faggot apologist. Take a shit in your hand and sniff it. That's what faggotry is. Not rainbows and unicorns. Nope. Nothing innocent or childish about it. It's two men prolapsing eachother's assholes till shit literally dribbles out. Filth.

Edit: degeneracy is general, it includes normal straight people as well as degenerate homosexuality. Learn reading comprehension instead of how to give blowjobs faggot.

There are no words...

Trigger warning: Graphic depiction of rape

Anonymous #fundie voat.co

Note: this quote was originally presented on two separate pages. The first part is linked directly below; the second part is linked in the attribution.

I have a tinder date this Saturday night, and I want to rape her...

My girlfriend of 5 years recently broke up with me, and by recently I mean 4 days ago. I feel suicidal and feel like I have nothing to lose by doing this. I've always had fantasies of raping a woman, so I figured I might as well do it now. I have an exit plan if I get caught, and I wouldn't mind ending it if that happens. I've never done this in the past because I didn't want to ruin my life, but I just don't care anymore. I started using tinder for the sole purpose of finding a woman that I can act out my fantasies on.

I'm planning on getting her drunk and having her come back to my house. I'm about a foot taller than her, so holding her down should be no issue. I don't know if that's a good way to proceed. Any suggestions?

——————————

It’s been a week, and I wanted to update last Sunday, but I’ve been too afraid to say anything. This is really stupid, but I know I truly have nothing to lose at this point. I did it. She almost didn’t come back to my house at the end of the date, but I was able to convince her I had no ill intentions. I could tell she didn’t really want to, but did it out of politeness. She was pretty tipsy when it happened. We started fooling around on the couch, but she wasn’t looking to have sex. I kept going and pushing her boundaries. She kept telling me to slow down, and she was getting more annoyed. I could tell she wanted to leave and before she could get the chance, I got on top and pinned her and kept kissing on her neck. She was resisting and telling me to get off of her. I ignored her. I was thinking I should stop, but I felt like I had gone too far already, and I had wanted to do this for years.

It eventually turned into her begging me to stop which got me going like crazy... About a minute or two in she stopped resisting and just kept on sobbing. It felt too good for me to feel bad about what I was doing at the time, but after I finished I regretted it. I could really see what a mess she was emotionally. As soon as I got off of her, she rushed to get dressed and get her stuff and go. I didn’t want to let her leave since I was afraid of what she would do, so I stood between her and the door. She was crying and shaking and hyperventilating and was clearly really afraid of me. She wouldn’t let me near her, and I could see in her face how scared she was, so I just decided to back off and let her leave. I knew I was prepared to deal with the consequences, so I just accepted it. I could see her on her phone before she disappeared around the corner and was sure the police would be at my door that night. I had my gun and was absolutely ready to kill myself that night.

This past week I’ve been laying low. I haven’t been to work. I’ve barely left the house. There has been no contact on either side. She’s blocked me on everything. She hasn’t made any social media updates since that day, so I don’t know what she’s thinking or planning. I’m still ready to go though. I really have nothing to live for.

Miriamthebat #kinkshaming antiyaoi.livejournal.com

I think gay people deserve all the rights straight ones have, but I wouldn't be too happy if I was gay and had the support of yuri fans. It's kind of like pedophiles supporting little children.

Lots of fans of every kind of fictional relationship don't seem to understand the difference between love and lust. I mean, you can love your S.O, you can love your brother, you can love your best buddy, and it's the same kind of love. But lust is a completely different thing. I have a gay friend who's deeply in love with a girl, and even though he's gay, they have a very sweet and loving relationship. And then I know tons of people who only date thoes who turn them on and think it counts as love.

The majority of slash writers seem to be overly horny kids who think love (or hate...) and lust go hand in hand, and ruin beautiful friendships by making them stick their tongues down eachothers throats and bang eachothers brains out. If JK Rowling decides to write about Harry and Ron crushing on eachother and eventually becoming a gay couple, that's fine and very sweet. But until then, there's absolutely no evidence of any lust, so any yaoi of them gets labeled "sick" by me.

edwest2 #fundie forums.catholic.com

Speaking from the US, the cry of "Why can't I get married" didn't end with a marriage license. Oh no. Gay wedding? A florist or baker or photographer refuses their services and legal action follows. Your schools will have storybooks for children showing gay marriage as normative. TV programs will casually include gay husbands or bisexual wives if they haven't already. 

If it was just two men or two women saying they were married and going about their lives, what will you tell your children? Will your children be told that any type of sexual desire or encounter is good or neutral? No one likes to be forced.

I see being sympathetic as a good trait but not if it is applied without knowing what marriage really means and has meant for thousands of years, then why should two men or two women get married? In the US, benefits were mentioned, but when states tried to give these benefits to gay couples without the word marriage, one LGBT site claimed that that would make them 'second-class citizens.' So gay marriage is not possible in a real sense even though it is legal.

And the next phase is gender identity. If a boy or girl in school feels they are actually the opposite sex then they can legally use a girls' restroom even though they are clearly boys. Then groups will be formed in schools so that gay and straight students can interact, but that's not all. You may have heard the term "diversity day," where all sorts of good and bad things are presented as 'we're all different but that's OK." Just use common sense. Not bullying a classmate for being gay is one thing but for young people whose knowledge of the outside world - the real world - is limited, such groups can cause confusion or even lead to invitations.

This is a situation where friendships and true, committed love boil down to 'any sex is good regardless of the mix and match number of partners." That's the end goal. And here, right as the gay marriage finish line was in sight, the fight for 'gay divorce' began. 

And civil rights? 

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/jef..._marriage.php3

http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/black-pas...-gay-marriage/


Just be honest. 


http://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Diversi.../dp/074252034X

I wish bullying other kids for being overweight, or to show your power to "persuade" them to give you money or just for upsetting other kids by disrespecting the pecking order in schools should have ended decades ago - for everybody. Teenagers would get into fistfights to show their strength or prove they were "real men." Ending that would have made schools better for all decades ago. But it seems it was not a hig

1amayatakeru #homophobia deviantart.com

I would like to add my two cents into the whole anti gay couple. First off. to people saying we have no right to complain about gay couples can fuck off. You twats have nothing to say when the LGBT complain about representation when the minorities complain about lack of diversity, then people who dislike gay couples can complain about the overuse of it in their fandoms without being treated like idiots.
Like that bitch peacefulinvasion who calls other users racist and homophobic while saying they shouldn't be offended with excessive drawings of gay couples, but is offended by words that she dislikes. They are words hunty, cover your eyes if they hurt your sensibilities.

In the fandoms the lgbt fanartists who draw excessive gay porn are damn hypocrites and using the fandom for their own gain. They are leeches. In fact, one such gay fanartist actually complained that she was upset that there was no gay content in the Witcher. I mean this is a game with beautiful graphics and a good storyline, and you can complain that Geralt is not getting butt loving. Really?
The gay couple artists don't care about the characters or the work, all they want is to soil the franchise or profit off them.
When they are not touting off about their commisions, which they feel represents their hard work of tracing from actual artists, they scream about stealing. I had some idiot come onto my deviantart and scream about how another user stole art, and I was supposed to care. Like bitch, the artist draws gay couples, who gives a fuck. See artists see fandoms as their willing slaves, hence as a fan you are obligated to support your fav artist when getting nothing in return.

And hating gay couples is natural. You want to know why you hate gay couples, cause it is natural to hate abnormalities, check out a science article who found men disliked seeeing gay men kiss similar to maggots. It is a biological response.

And people screaming about how we want to stop artists from drawing what they love, bohoohoo. The artist only draw what gets them views and commisions, it is disgusting that some plagarist artist can demand 40 dollars for his copypasta while real artists who attempt to do worthwhile things don't get to demand as such.
There is no freedom of expression, everything has a limit and is censor. Same way someone can't use hate speech or someone else will be offended, someone can't fill the space with gay porn and expect not to get hate on.
And as consumers we can complain about the gayfying of our fandom just like anyone.
Like how gays complain of queerbaiting when there is none.
or how they start stupid shit by encouraging heterosexual characters be gay cause its sexy
like #giveelesaagirlfriend, #givecaptainamericaaboyfriend and all that crap.
Gay fanartists have lead to increase in gay support and a demand by entitled fans to make their gay couples canon. And it does have an effect on real life that directly effects everyone. Look at Korrasami, a gay couple in a kids show, what does it teach girls? Use men and disgard them for women. What about the popularity of Klance that ruins the friendship between two men to make them gay in a kids show. It is sick.
We can start #stopmakinggayfanart. It is not healthy and downright creepy.

Some incels #fundie #sexist reddit.com

Wahmen are the most empathetic Gender

image

@Sleepcel

Foid: I won't take responsibility for anything in my life, including my BB roping and my disabled child

Reddit: 7 platinum, 9 gold, 24 silver

Imagine number of threats in pms if man posted it

dude the guy would have been doxed and legit abused online forever but if wahmen does it shes rewarded and cared for jfl at this fucked up world

Honestly I'd do the same if I had disabled child but at least I can admit it would be pos move

but the thing is she gave birth to it , raised it for 7 years and loses all of that in a secound just because she was tired there are social services and care people to handle those issues no need to abandon your son for that

Was tired=Chad was turned off when saw vegetable knocking on bedroom door

@MayflyEng

Tbh I completely understand, with most cases of chromosome deletion the children end up SEVERELY retarded. Seriously you'll be able to form a deeper friendship with a parrot than your own child, on top of the parrot being more independent. Children with this level of retardation should never be born. I checked out the thread and my suspicions are confirmed, the "kid" is a literal poop machine that shows no signs of being able to communicate in any way whatsoever.

OP is a responsible mother in in my opinion if anything, as she can now take care of her 12 year old son. I have really no idea why this is here.

The "responsible" mother would have kept her legs shut and not have a kid.

How much do you want to bet she had the kid after age 30? That's when the rate of developmental disorders go up.

Women don't care about babies. They just want the life of a "mommy". It's disgusting and they should all be beheaded for it.

r/antinatalism

Agreed, it should have been aborted in the first place

No it shouldn't have been conceived to begin with. Abortion is just an out from consequences for whores.

shut the fuck up retard, she was probably trying for a kid

Even worse. Imagine bringing someone into this world with no regard for their wellbeing

How would she have known the kid was gonna end up disabled when she already gave birth to a healthy child?

And it should have absolutely been aborted you dipshit.

Literally everyone is aware downs syndrome is a thing. Don't have a kid unless you're ok with them getting that kind of disorder.

It could happen to anyone and you're a retard if you're ok with taking that kind of chance with your kids when there's perfectly good kids to adopt.

Having kids is the ultimate selfish foid thing to do

@ImHereForTheImages

We were told when I was pregnant that he would have Down Syndrome

Then why didn't you abort him, you dumb cunt?

maybe they live in a state that bans abortion

Nah, checked the whole post. She said she would have aborted him if she knew how he was going to turn out, but she thought her son was going to just be a regular downie and she was a-ok with that, so fuck her.

@Colin_Copernick

Fucking disgusting. She WANTS a to believe her husband roped because of the disabledcel, so that she can feel less guilty by shipping said disabledcel to a REEE home.

I hope the 12yo grows to resent her

@PhilMcCracken760

I never understood why women continue to carry pregnancies after being told that their child is going to be a potato. Best case scenario for Down's Syndrome is a make-work job under close supervision until they die of cardiac disease at 50. Worst case scenario is exactly this: a child so profoundly disabled that you would rather end your life than endure any more.

I don't blame her for ditching her child, but I do blame her for knowing goddamn well that this was coming and still carrying it to term. As far as I'm concerned, she's an accessory to her husband's suicide.

@SHLOMO_SHEKELFELD

lol you fucking cucks. Spartans used to dump deformed babies off the Taygetus and you get mad at some woman doing it after suffering for 7 years. just give the retard the shot and be done with it jesus fuck

@kamikazegeneral

I may hate women, but people with Down syndrome are a fucking strain on society. No one should be forced to waste their life taking care of those things

Things

Hi Himmler, hows the weather down there?

he thinks retards are people

Ok retard

@St_BlackOps4Cel

It's these cases where I support euthanasia, that child will never be able to live a normal life, he's a fucking vegetable. But yeah, the fucking cunt won't take responsibility for her husband's suicide, she just puts it all on her disabled kid as if she were a petulant child, women have fucking child mentalities.

Alan smithee #fundie boards.straightdope.com

on being friends with a pedophile that actively downloads real child porn


Hell, I'll go further than most, and say that I would continue to be friends with him even if he had actually done something provided that all of the following conditions were met: He was caught and convicted, he was punished, he complied with all of the elements of legal supervision (parole, registration as a sex offender, etc.), he admits what he did, he feels bad about it, it happened no more than once, he was under 22 when it happened, it has been at least 10 years since it happened, and all the other conditions of the OP are met.

I believe in judging people as they are now. It would take a lot of convincing for me to believe that all of those conditions were met (and of course things like his age and the length of time are not bright lines), but if he is really as good a friend as described, I think it would be possible.

I will add the following caveats: I have no kids. If I did, I think I'd still be friends under the OP's conditions, but very likely not if he'd actually done anything. I'm sure I'd agonize over it no matter what. And finally, I'm not sure this makes me a better person. My natural tendency is to react to people based on what I actually see, not on what else I know about them. It's easy to make this into a virtue, but it could just as much be moral laziness. Along with this is the fact that I don't tend to form extremely close friendships, so what I'm picturing as a continued friendship may be just an aquaintenceship to someone else.

Oh, and regarding the legal aspect, I voted that he would be convicted and it would stand (assuming he was convicted of obscenity, not child pornography), but actually, I believe that most people in that situation would plead guilty and not appeal it only to get the whole ordeal over with. (A decision they would possibly regret, but nevertheless what they would do. Fighting a legal battle is very expensive and extremely stressful and this story would undoubtedly be in the press a great deal while it was ongoing in court.)

Lysis #racist dailykos.com

We messed up. Royally. And from now on, all of us white people are guilty until proven innocent, and rightfully so.

I don't trust my fellow white people at all now, and I share their privilege.

Those without that privilege? They have the right and duty to steer clear of us until we’ve proven ourselves as allies, and even then, the suspicion can never fully go away.

Authors' friends #racist #fundie supchina.com

Nationalism Ruined My Chinese Friendships

As it turns out, Mingjun came from a military family — a fact I was unaware of. In the past few years, some of her family members had been dispatched to Xinjiang to help maintain the region’s security. “Many people had died,” she said, referring to the Han Chinese victims of the 2009 Urumqi riots as well as subsequent attacks in 2014. She said the police patrolled the streets 24/7, and anyone with a slightly higher nose than a typical Han Chinese would be stopped for inspection.

“Isn’t that targeting the entire ethnicity?” I retorted.

“Mei ban fa!” She exclaimed. There’s just no other way.

“But see, that’s exactly why the West has been critical,” I said. “They come from a human rights perspective, and these innocent people have been deprived of their basic human rights. They’re humans, too, you know.”

“Yes, they’re humans, but what about the bigger population beyond the region? What about people of the entire country? Who’s accounting for their security?” At this point, Mingjun had become very agitated. To ease the tension, others around the table started agreeing with whatever she said in order to calm her down.

*

The first time they ganged up on me was over the issue of U.S. deployment of THAAD in South Korea. China reacted strongly, seeing it as a threat to its national security. To put pressure on South Korea, the Chinese government orchestrated a series of boycotts against Korean businesses in China, including retail giant Lotte. Some Lotte stores were reportedly ransacked by nationalistic Chinese citizens. In our WeChat group, I expressed frustration with this tactic, calling it 土豪外交 (tǔháo wàijiāo) — “new-money diplomacy.”

One person responded immediately. “You Americans aren’t any better!” he said. “How long has the world endured America’s hegemony?” My response to that was, just because America did similar things doesn’t make it right. Lots of countries have corrupt leaders. Just because countries A, B, and C all have them doesn’t make the problem go away. He saw my point.

The second person, whom I’ll call Tang, thought I was gulled by media reports. According to him, there really weren’t that many boycotts. To prove his point, he contacted a travel agent while we were talking, asking her if recent trips to Korea had been cancelled. She said no. “See? Rumors can be easily dismissed. It’s the media that hypes things up,” Tang said. He also thought the nationalistic behaviors were among the few and didn’t represent the majority.

I responded by saying that one travel agency could hardly represent the whole picture, and that many media reports were indeed based on facts. Whether the boycotts were overwhelming or not, I said, the behavior should still be called into question.

As for the level of nationalism, many others weighed in. Some believed it was overwhelming, an act of group instinct that is often evident among the Chinese. One person pointed out that under China’s current education and propaganda systems, nationalism was inevitable.

*

On August 4, 2018, during a soccer game between Shanghai Shenhua and Changchun Yatai in China’s top league, a fight broke out between two players. Demba Ba, a French-born Senegalese player who signed a lease with Shanghai Shenhua three years earlier, accused Zhāng Lì 张力, a Chinese player from the opposing team, of hurling racist insults at him. According to Ba, Zhang kept shouting “You black!” at him, which spurred his immediate reaction. The dispute was handed over to the Chinese Football Association, and Zhang was punished for “disturbing regular orders of the game.” No word of racism was mentioned in the verdict.

In our WeChat group, discussions broke out over the issue of racism. Tang led the discussion. He said the West had a history of racism against blacks, but the Chinese simply weren’t racist.

I gaped. Just six months earlier, an Africa skit during the Chinese New Year Gala on CCTV had featured blackface and equated Africans with monkeys. A few years back, a laundry detergent commercial had featured a black man who was fed the detergent and pushed into a washing machine by a Chinese woman. When he came out, he was a light-skinned Asian. I brought up these two examples to support my counterargument.

“Fine,” Tang replied with a face palm. “Maybe there are racist Chinese, but I’m not one of them.”

“The point is not to judge,” I continued, “but to reflect on our cultural psyche and see how we can do better.”

For a moment, no one said anything, and I dropped my phone to carry on with my life, leaving WeChat on mute. Then Tang came back. “Black soccer players have been paid very well in China. For many Chinese, we just find their looks interesting, that’s all…And maybe this had nothing to do with racism at all. Maybe it was a cover for a foul.”

During that disputed game, before Ba and Zhang went after each other, Ba was fighting for the ball with another Chinese player on the opposing team, and the latter fell to the ground after the two collided in the air. That was when Zhang came to his teammate’s defense, allegedly calling Ba “You black.” Tang was referring to the collision before the conflict broke out.

Several others agreed with Tang. “The blacks in the league have a history of doing that,” one person said. “They commit nasty fouls.”

*

On October 1, as China celebrated the 70th anniversary of the PRC, my WeChat moments were filled with patriotic sentiment. Many of my classmates posted pictures from the awe-inspiring military parade on Tiananmen Square. “The Republic has walked past 70 tremendous years, and we’ve come a long way. Proud of you, my dear motherland!” one person remarked. While the parade was being aired on state-owned television, our WeChat group was also filled with festive messages. Everyone weighed in on the spectacle: the uniforms, the weaponry, the female soldiers, President Xi’s speech his makeup…

Amid this chatter, one person in our group commented on a recent experience on Twitter. Despite the social media platform being blocked in China, she often climbs the great firewall with the help of a VPN. On Twitter, she said she had been fed outrageous messages by Chinese dissidents living overseas. On this special occasion, she said, they were ready to make trouble, their attacks on China fiercer than ever.

“Why is that?” Tang responded. “Why are these yellow-skinned, Chinese-speaking, highly educated people so bent on demonizing their home country?”

Judgybitch #fundie judgybitch.com

So two of the boys involved in the Steubenville “rape” case were found guilty and will now face imprisonment and a lifetime membership on the Registered List of Sex Offenders. That is a tragedy for the boys, for justice and for the victims of actual rape. As we go through this case, ask yourself who benefits from this verdict, and why.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/17/justice/ohio-steubenville-case/index.html?hpt=hp_inthenews

Most of the facts in this case seem relatively incontrovertible: a young woman, who was not part of the regular social group, went to a football party, in a town mad for football, got trashed out of her mind, voluntarily accompanied two of the biggest football stars to another party, passed out and then got treated like a whore.

http://judgybitch.com/2012/12/18/a-shit-faced-drunk-girl-a-football-star-and-a-vigilante-feminist-the-makings-of-a-fairy-tale/

In a moment of mind-numbing stupidity, the boys opted to film their “assault” on the girl, which involved fingering her while she was passed out. Rather than leave her in a ditch somewhere, they carried her around to different locations, none of which had any adult supervision.

What the fuck, Steubenville? Where are all the goddamn grown-ups?

The law in Ohio states that ANY penetration, however slight, constitutes rape. Let’s start there. Comparing a stupid, drunk, helmet-chasing whore who gets fingered while passed out to an actual rape victim is completely and utterly absurd.

This is rape:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/28/indian-gang-rape-victim-dies-hospital_n_2377717.html

So is this:

http://haysfreepress.com/2012/05/07/florida-man-extradited-in-hays-county-brutal-rape-case/#axzz2NtuPnHlh

And this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_Jogger_case

Now, the girl in Steubenville is claiming she didn’t actually drink all that much, and someone must have drugged her! Toxicology tests? NEGATIVE.

Oh my! You mean she’s a lying little tramp desperately trying to avoid ANY culpability for what happened to her? Well color me shocked.

Defense attorneys say a toxicology report performed a day later showed no signs of drugs.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/steubenville-rape-trial-witness-testifies-recording-alleged-assault/story?id=18738378

The most telling thing about this whole case is that multiple people saw the little tramp passed out and carried about by a couple of douchey guys, and make no mistake, those boys behaved shamefully. Part of having the adulation and admiration that comes along with being a small town football star is not to abuse that power when the little gold-digging status whores come a-calling, and those boys failed.

Punishment > Crime

That girl had no friends at the party, not one person had enough respect for her to step in, she was not part of the social tribe and there is no way in hell she did not know that. She went to that party to nab herself a football player, and lo and behold, the football players didn’t really like such an obvious grasp at their glory.

Find yourself another wagon to hitch to, little star.

The saddest thing is that the boys sobbingly admit that they ruined her life! They are accused of having “no moral code”! Oh, and the girl had an impeccable one, did she?

RUINED HER LIFE?!?!

Are you fucking kidding me? They are going to jail! They will be registered sex offenders! They are convicted criminals! One night of behaving like assholes will follow them the rest of their lives, and HER LIFE IS RUINED!!

Her life is not ruined in the slightest. LittleTramp is free to go about her life, getting as drunk as she likes, chasing after any high-status males she likes, and securing criminal convictions against men who treat her like the whore she is.

God help the varsity athletes at whatever college campus she ends up on, and no doubt LittleTramp will get back on her feet after suffering a little humiliation and continue on with her life because SHE’S RUINED.

The young men in this case will never escape the disgustingly unfair consequences of a night of acting like dicks, while the young woman will carry on, unless she feels she isn’t getting quite enough sympathy, of course. Cue the Prozac and therapy!


You know what we need? We need a Drunk Whore Registry. If sex offenders are registered for the protection of all women, then why not register drunk whores for the protection of all men? It’s true that men could protect themselves by not acting like dicks, but combine small-town celebrity with lots of alcohol and no adult supervision, and you WILL get men acting like assholes and women acting like sluts.

When we only punish one side on that equation, we have a serious cultural problem. Men are held to account for their irresponsible decisions made while young and stupid and drunk, but women are not? Most crimes acknowledge explicitly that mitigating circumstances create different categories of crime with correspondingly progressive punishments. Why is rape different?

The punishment these boys face, which will be in effect for THE REST OF THEIR LIVES is way out of proportion to the “crime”. The definition of rape in Ohio is so broadly defined that the act of being a dickhead is now as serious as the act of fucking a woman forcibly and against her will. And if you don’t think there is a material difference between getting fingered and getting fucked, you are probably a feminist.

Getting drunk and chasing after football stars demonstrates level of stupidity and disrespect for the humanity of the men in question (who are valued only for their status), and that disrespect was returned. But only the boys are held responsible for that.

I say bullshit. No one got raped in Steubenville. Someone got humiliated, and she participated willingly and readily in her own humiliation. Turning stupid decisions made by high-school students into criminal acts with consequences that will follow only ONE party for their rest of their lives is deeply unfair, and when fingering a slut at an alcohol fuelled party is put in the same category as violent sexual assault, the real victims are drowned in a chorus of pathetic mewlings of women who didn’t get to bag the star.

Who thinks that if the young woman had woken up the next morning next to the football player, his arms wrapped around her in a loving embrace, she would have considered that the price she had to pay to land the big fish?


Steubenville: sour fucking grapes.

Not just sour, bitter, too. But only for the men.

How is that justice? Who is served when those boys are locked up? Who is protected? Who wins? How ironic is it that the adults who were NOT present to lend some sanity to what their own children were up to are now fully involved to make certain only the boys are punished?

People make stupid decisions. Especially when they are young. They act like idiots. They treat other people with a lack of respect. They behave shamefully. It happens. Holding boys, and only boys responsible, moves justice from being blind to being blatantly sexist. When justice can only see one sex as guilty, it’s time to put out her eyes again.


Sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind.

Lots of love,

JB

Gunnery Sgt. Joseph Felix #fundie nypost.com

A former Marine Corps drill instructor was convicted by a military jury of physically abusing young recruits — focusing his fury on three Muslim-Americans whom he referred to as “terrorists.”

The eight-man jury at Camp Lejeune, NC, determined Thursday that Gunnery Sgt. Joseph Felix was guilty of hazing and maltreatment of recruits at the boot camp in Parris Island, SC.

[...]

Felix was accused of being a central figure in an abusive group of drill instructors that came to light after the March 2016 suicide of one of the three Muslim-American recruits he targeted.

[...]

He had pleaded not guilty and did not testify during his trial.

The lengthy list of charges against Felix included a series of disturbing acts against more than a dozen recruits. They included ordering recruits to choke each other, ordering them to drink chocolate milk and then training them until they vomited, assaulting recruits, and forcing Muslim recruits into a clothes dryer.

“He wasn’t making Marines. He was breaking Marines,” prosecutor Lt. Col. John Norman told the jury.

Felix was a “bully” who particularly “picked out three Muslim recruits for special abuse because of their Muslim faith,” he said.

In one case, Felix ordered former trainee Lance Cpl. Ameer Bourmeche into a commercial clothes dryer, which then was turned on as Felix ordered him to renounce his Islamic faith, prosecutors said.

Bourmeche testified that he twice affirmed his creed and twice Felix and another DI sent him for a scorching tumble inside the dryer. After a third spin, Bourmeche said, he feared for his life and renounced his faith. The DIs then let him out, he said.

Felix also maltreated Raheel Siddiqui, 20, a Pakistani-American. Siddiqui committed suicide in March 2016 after Felix barked at and slapped him, prosecutors said.

[...]

In 2015 and 2016, the DI derided Siddiqui and two other Muslims as “terrorists,” Norman said. Felix also ordered Bourmeche to simulate chopping off the head of a fellow Marine while reciting “God is great” in Arabic, Norman said.

Felix was permanently removed from his duties as a DI after the probe began, said Marine Corps spokesman Capt. Joshua Pena.

Billybob - The True American Patriot #fundie speakout.com

[Paragraph breaks added]

Does anyone really wonder why the Liberals want our guns? Its real simple. Many of them are Homo-Nazi fascists and are ready to start a civil war on the Right. But first they want our guns taken away. Does anybody really buy their sob stories about all the gun accidents with children. They do not care about our children. They don't care about their own and they have aborted most of theirs anyway. Can you really see a Liberal homo-nazi saying that poor right winged child accidentally shot himself. Yeah right! Their agenda is becoming very clear. They want to rape and pillage anyone that doesn't agree with them. They hate the Christians and anyone that voted republican. We are all right-winger bigots.

Don't be fooled by the term "Gay". There is nothing gay about the homosexuals and they are becoming very violent as history has proven time and time again. Remember they are afraid of our guns. They could care less about accidents or human life. Its just not possible to support murdering 40 million plus unborn babies and caring about a poor right-winger child that accidentally shoots himself. The Homo-Nazi fascist want to raid our homes and commit acts of violence and rape.

They do not want guns in our homes when they carry out their agenda's. They also want our Bibles. That is a fact people. The say it is hate speech and want it banned. They have already started the process in Canada. There really is no other explanation as to why they want to take our guns.
Billybob-True American Patriot

DaveA37 #racist freerepublic.com

This is long but you won’t regret reading this.
I wanted to clear up a few black and white questions and answers. The things I state are facts. They are not downloaded from some media website, not propaganda, just observations from a 70-year-old black man, born in America.
I was told by my parents (yes, a married man and woman with my last name), that I was a nigger. We lived in “Nigger Town ” in a small Texas town, no A/C, grass growing through the floor, no car, no TV. We washed our bodies with lye soap that my mother made by hand. I thought I was a nigger until I graduated high school, went to college, did an enlistment in the Army, and got a job.
I am now retired, own my own home, have 6 children by ONE WOMAN, and we all have the SAME LAST NAME. I have a Bachelor’s Degree in Liberal Arts, aMaster’s Degree in Sociology. My retirement, VA disability from combat in theKorean War (I only have one leg), and part-time pay in a local college, is about $125,000 a year. From dirt poor nigger to old, black, proud American.

Yes, I am black, and I can say “nigger,” because I understand the true meaning of the word.
Let’s clear up a few things about the Michael Brown incident.
-Fact: It is not called “shoplifting or stealing,” it’s called “robbery,” which is a felony. Brown stole something and assaulted someone, that means ROBBERY. It’s on video and it’s a fact. Not shoplifting, not theft, not “lifting” a few cigars, but ROBBERY!
-Michael Brown, like Trayvon, was portrayed by the media as a “little black boy,” cute little headphones, and his cap and gown photo, gunned down by a ruthless police assassin - executed by “whitey.” First, I have never seen a cop drag a person into their car’s driver door to arrest them. So, let us be clear, Michael Brown was a nigger - a sorry assed, criminal, hoodlum, nigger. Nobody wants to say that, but I will. He had a criminal record a mile long, was known for numerous assaults, robberies, including the one you saw with your own eyes, and still refuse to call a robbery. He was, like so many others, living a life that he thought he was “entitled” to, just for being alive. Gangsta rap, weed, drinking, guns, and those stupid-assedlow profile rims, makes him some kind of bad-ass nigger.

-I have fought communist Chinese and North Korean soldiers in the 1950’s with more honor than that nigger. Yep, I peeled potatoes and shot communists. That’s the only job a nigger soldier could get.
-Rodney King? Black Riots!
-Trayvon? Black Riots!
-Hurricane Katrina? Black Riots!
-O.J. Simpson? Kills white man and white woman and found NOT GUILTY. Did white folks riot? Nope!

-In fact, when is the last time white people rioted? Civil War, maybe? That’sbecause they are, relatively, civilized people, much like many black Americans. Protesting is one thing - hell, I’m all for it. Even if you are an ignorant idiot, you have a right to protest.
-Stop only showing the young black “cap and gown” photos of Michael. CharlesManson may have a few of those laying around, as well. Show the nigger “gangsta” photos of the “poor unarmed teenager” (grown man) pics that have been removed from his Facebook page, holding the loaded pistol, smoking weed, with a mouthful of money.
-Militarization? The stupid-assed media that publicizes this has no idea what “militarization” really is. Cops wear helmets and vests, and drive armored vehicles because unemployed niggers throw bricks and Molotov cocktails at them, moron! You put on an “Adam 12” uniform and walk down the streets of Ferguson during the criminal riots. I can guarantee that you’ll jump into the first armored “military tank” that you see.
-You only “want the police” when you “need the police,” otherwise, you mock and fear what you do not understand about the police. And by the way, the police are trained to take your s—t, but I wouldn’t mess around with those Army National Guard, they aren’t as well disciplined “culturally” to take your s—t like police do every day. They will ventilate your black asses with M-16s with military precision and extreme prejudice.

-And finally, is the way we protest and demand justice is to run down the streets breaking s—t, looting stores, and acting like a bunch of untrained monkeys? Hell, after Rodney King, criminal niggers were actually killing people, thinking they were entitled to be worse criminals than they already were. For those black criminals that do that, you are a disgrace to your race, inflamed by idiots like Al Sharpton, instead of listening to logic from proud black Americans, like Bill Cosby, SamuelJackson, Colin Powell, Allen West, me, etc.
-You blame white people for your ignorance, criminal acts, unemployed laziness, etc.
-You blame white people for 89% of the prisons in America being full of blacks. They did nothing wrong, the racists white cops framed them all. Right? No chance at school, no chance for college, military, employment? BULL S—T!
-More niggers kill niggers, than niggers killing whites, whites killing niggers, and whites killing whites ... COMBINED! I find this astounding.
-It’s not white peoples’ faults, the Emancipation Proclamation was signed by a white man years ago. You can go to school, get a job, buy a house, and vote, JUST LIKE WHITE FOLKS!!!! You are not a slave, you are not discriminated against! Slavery is abolished, and nobody alive today was alive when it was popular. Get over it!

You are discriminated against because you are a criminal, sorry-assednigger. Otherwise, black Americans are treated like everyone else.
If you choose to create “baby daddy and baby mama,” and fake disabilities as an excuse for laziness to draw Social Security disability instead of husband, wife, family, job, mortgage, it’s YOUR FAULT, not white folks. And there are a lot of proud black Americans that will tell you the same. I AM ONE OF THEM!!!
Remember, the way you act on the camera, is remembered by everyone who sees it. They will never forget it. It shows them how you, as the black race, respond to situations that don’t particularly go the way you think they should. It will become a reference standard, something they expect from you when the next media report doesn’t go your way. Stop being stupid niggers and be a proud black American. My parents raised me well, but they were wrong about one thing - I am not a nigger.

I will not be around long. While my mind is still sharp, and my aim is still good, my body is eating away with cancer. It started in the prostate, and is spreading rapidly. After I die, I have asked my children to publish my writings and include my name. Although I am not expecting any miracles, I can only hope that Americans will stop blaming color, start blaming criminals, and see people for what they really are.
We have too many countries that want us dead. We should not be fighting each other.

Matt Barber #fundie christianpost.com

I'm never going to win a popularity contest. It's not my goal to be liked. I'll probably never be a "Fox News contributor" or even broadly recognized as a dutifully compliant cog within the greater, GOP-heavy "conservative" political wheel. That's because I say things like this: There is no political fix to America's death spiral. We are drowning in a turgid river of postmodern relativism. This is a spiritual problem, not a political problem. This is a worldview matter, not a partisan matter.

Hitherto it has been "progressives" alone dumping buckets of moral relativist poison into the Potomac. But, in the last decade or so, self-styled "conservatives" have likewise begun drinking the subjectivist Kool-Aid.

Libertine libertarianism has infected the conservative movement like a cancer. Situational ethics, driven by emotional, anecdotal sob stories, are used to justify every moral wrong as an absolute right. "Get off the social issues!" they demand. "Gay marriage? No problem."

These gun-toting, free-market "conservatives" (of which I'm both) grace us with beauties like this: "I'm a 'pro-choice,' 'pro-gay' conservative," or, "Yeah, I'm shacking up with my girlfriend, big deal."

Relativism blurs the fixed lines of demarcation between right and wrong, which leads to the abolition of absolute truth, which leads to pockets of moral anarchy, which leads to Barack Obama and Eric Holder deciding which laws to ignore and which laws to enforce, which leads to lawlessness, which leads to chaos.

Welcome to chaos.

Yes. The "social issues" matter.

The battle is not Republican vs. Democrat. Neither is it conservative vs. liberal. The battle precedes time itself. The battle is right vs. wrong. The battle is moral vs. immoral. The battle is truth vs. the lie.

The battle is between good and evil.

We've been playing political Ping-Pong for decades. We've been, as they say, rearranging the chairs on the Titanic while Democrats take the helm for a spell, and Republicans take the helm for a spell.

The reality is that both political parties have driven us into the iceberg, and then pranced off together, hand-in-hand, to play best-of-three racquetball at the congressional bathhouse.

While here at CPAC I met an interesting fellow by the name of Frank Mitchell. Frank founded the Memphis-based, classically conservative group: "A Shining City on a Hill." During our discussion, Frank said this: "There is no liberty without justice. Liberty without justice is only license."

Libertine libertarianism.

America cannot survive under a worldview that embraces unrestricted moral license. Such license destroys the individual. And such license destroys the nation.
"Liberty without justice is only license."

There is only one Arbiter of true justice. And justice is defined by Him, not by us. He sets the parameters. As both individuals, and as a nation, we are ill-advised to breach those parameters and well-served to maintain them.

America does not need a political fix. America needs a spiritual fix.

czakal #racist diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com

The second twist is Beinart’s inclusion of Biblical references to support his case.

Much Jewish sophistry intended for internal consumption contains lame Biblical references like these designed to lend the demands, which are fundamentally driven by Jewish ethnic self-interest, an air of moral plausibility and divine sanction. As with almost all Jewish sophistry, it falls apart on closer examination.

The three Biblical anecdotes Beinart cites to explain why Jews should be nice to immigrants are the episodes in which Abraham and his nephew Lot welcome strangers into their homes and one in which Abraham resides temporarily in Egypt. Here are the relevant portions of his article.

The worst anti-Semitic attack in American history occurred while Jews around the world were reading the Torah portion that tells the story of Lot, an immigrant.
Lot moves to Sodom, and prospers there. The Midrash says he becomes a judge. His daughters intermarry with the locals. Then one day, while sitting at the gates of the city, the assimilating immigrant sees two strangers approach. He asks them to “spend the night and bathe your feet”— the Midrash says he learned to welcome strangers from his uncle Abraham, the first Jew. Lot “prepares them a feast.”

But in Sodom, the natives hate strangers. “Where are the men who came to you tonight?” they demand. “Bring them out to us.” Lot tries to protect his guests. “I beg you friends,” he implores, “do not commit such a wrong.” For the men of Sodom, however, this just underscores Lot’s foreignness. He hasn’t really assimilated; he isn’t one of them. He’s a threat. “The fellow came here an immigrant and already acts the ruler,” they declare. “Now we will deal worse with you than with them.”

…As Parsha Vayera suggests, welcoming the stranger is among the most fundamental Jewish imperatives. Lot “baked unleavened” bread for the strangers who came to Sodom. The parallel to the exodus from Egypt is clear. Lot and Abraham welcomed strangers; Pharaoh oppressed them. And 36 times in the Torah Jews are reminded to be like Abraham and Lot: To remember the heart of the stranger because were strangers in the land of Egypt.

In Abraham’s case, the guests tell Abraham that his wife, Sarah, shall bear him a child, even though she is old.

In Lot’s case, the guests shepherd Lot and his family out of the city, Sodom, so they can escape its impending destruction.

According to Beinart, this proves that good things happen to Jews when they are nice to strangers.

Now let’s proceed to a critical examination of these claims.

First, Abraham had left his place of origin, Ur, and entered someone else’s country, Canaan, which, as their names suggests, belonged to the Canaanites.

Abraham and the Lord (the projected image of the Jewish tribal ego) planned to dispossess the Canaanites of their land.

“The Canaanite was then in the land”. This phrase, or variants of it, appear several times in the Biblical text. They, of course, imply that the Canaanites are no longer in their land at the time the Bible was written, because they have been dispossessed and destroyed by the Jews.

When Canaan experienced a famine, Abram and his wife “sojourned” in Egypt. Abraham told his wife, Sarai, to pretend she was his sister so he could pimp her out as a marriage prospect to the local Egyptian notables. (Genesis 12)

Both Sarai and Abram (their names became Sarah and Abraham later) were well treated by the Pharaoh.

The Pharaoh, however, found that his land was soon tormented by plagues. When he inquired into the reasons for this, he learned that Sarai was Abram’s wife, not his sister, and the “Lord” was punishing him for this. Even then, after discovering that the proto-Jew Abram had grossly and basely deceived him, the Pharaoh doesn’t harm him but permits him to go peaceably on his way, even allowing him to retain the riches he had acquired.

Let’s come now to the anecdotes in Genesis 18 & 19 where Abraham and Lot are nice to “strangers” and arrange for them to be given food and shelter.

Abraham knew that the guests were not normal guests, but were somehow mystical emissaries of God. He surely doesn’t deserve much moral credit, then, for choosing to be nice to them.

It’s not clear from the Biblical text whether Lot also knew his guests were mystical emissaries of God although there is a hint that he did. In any case, when he welcomes them into his house, the people of the town crowd round about, asking to have a look at them. Lot refuses to let them and, bizarrely, offers his daughters up to be gang-raped in order to protect the immigrants.

The townspeople decline this offer and insist on having a look at the “guests”. Their suspicion is entirely justified because the guests are there to destroy the city and, in fact, do destroy it the following day. The Jews welcomed in and sheltered the “immigrants” (angels) who ultimately destroyed the city, killing all of its inhabitants except the Jews.

All three of the Biblical anecdotes referenced by Beinart have the following elements in common:
* Jews enter a land that isn’t theirs.
* In contrast to what Beinart implies, they are initially welcomed and well-treated by the locals.
* In the course of time, the behaviour of the Jews arouses suspicion and anger.
* Jews then bring ruin upon the original inhabitants of the land they have entered. To the Canaanites they bring death and dispossession. To the Egyptians, they bring plague. To the inhabitants of Sodom (Sodomites!), they bring complete annihilation.

In every case, the local people who were nice to the Jews and accepted them as immigrants or refugees are ultimately harmed or destroyed by them and their vicious God.
Beinart thinks this proves that Jews should be nice to immigrants. I think it proves Gentiles should be suspicious of Jews.

freeman17 #conspiracy beforeitsnews.com

Before I read your comments, weeks ago, I realized there is no real effort to bring in people for this event. I thought of the logistics required for such an event, such as sanitation (port a potties), accommodations, food, medical emergencies etc. I never saw any call for volunteers who can contribute their expertise in any area, not even security (usher organizers).

Then it occurred to me what if this is being staged to fail so that patriots will feel demoralized by the lack of participation. Its not beyond possible, infiltrator agents could easily steer such an event in their direction and create any atmosphere which will satisfy those trying to discredit a real event such as this.

I am still waiting for streaming videos and pictures of crowds, but have yet to see anything even on non-mainstream media. Where are the speakers? Where are the interviews? Where are the live feeds of throngs of people.

I’m not a naysayer, just a realist on this matter. Cliven Bundy’s recent altercation with the BLM in Nevada proves my point. FBI infiltrated patriot supporters who showed up and now, the FBI is reviewing films, license plates etc, to see who they can prosecute from that event. So, its not as if Obama and his Gestapo goons wont go to extremes to make people disappear or discredit an event and those who show up for it.

I’m not sure if my suspicion is correct, but it wouldn’t hurt for patriots to keep an open mind for a government scam operation to deliberately discourage patriots from such an event.

Guy in Bumblebee Suit #sexist freerepublic.com

WILMINGTON, Del. - A sixth-grade science teacher who was accused of having sex with a 13-year-old student has been sentenced to 10 years in prison. Rachel L. Holt, 35, had pleaded guilty to second-degree rape. She sobbed in court Friday as Superior Court Judge Calvin L. Scott gave her the mandatory minimum sentence.

Prosecutors had wanted Scott to sentence Holt to the maximum of 25 years.

Holt was initially charged with 28 counts of first-degree rape.

Police accused her of having sex with the boy that many times during an intense weeklong affair. She was also accused of plying the boy with alcohol and allowing him to drive her car.

I agree. Rape is rape, but this hardly stinks of the charge. 28 times in one week? Obviously he wasn't "forced" into 28 times in one week. Did she take advantage of him? Absolutely. But I agree, this does not merit ten years in jail. There are people, some on this forum, anxious and happy to throw anyone accused of anything that offends their sensibilities in the slammer for life.

Let's not become the left, friends, merely substituting our own "excuses" to lock away everyone we disagree with.

We must have laws, and they must be enforced, but society must also be served.

kikii07 #fundie #sexist reddit.com

#PrettygirlCurse

I just stumbled on a YouTube video of a girl talking about she had 20+ jobs and she wasn't able to fit in because she's pretty and has to deal with catty women. I'm just going to be a bit blunt and correct me if I'm wrong but, I'd take the pretty girl "curse" any day than the torment I go through for being ugly. I understand everything has its advantages and disadvantages but the advantages of being pretty beats the disadvantages. I can't even get a temporary job yet there is someone who can hop scotch from job to job even being a brand embassador? Talk about life on easy mode for these women.

I've gotten more attractive in the last 7 years but before that I was picked on constantly and treated like crap by my peers, particularly men.

My biggest problem now as an "attractive woman" is how annoying it is when guys persistently hit on me. Its not comparable to how shitty it feels the other way around. These people couldn't even begin to imagine how awful it is to be an outcast all because you're not pretty enough. Talk about soul crushing.

I agree with you sis. Also congratulations on maxxing

I hate it when they play the victim. Girl, your entire worth is your looks and yet you somehow think they are a curse??? Lmao, try living a week without them and then tell me how it went.

They know it but will play I don't know what wha wha card

Yeah I may come across as harsh but I really don't give a shit about their apparent #prettygirlproblems. Like I feel a lot of the issues they complain about are exaggerated or rooted more in their individual personalities as oppose to them actually being pretty. From what I've seen women tend to flock to attractive women and want to befriend them, they also automatically find them more trustworthy and give ugly women all the negative connotations of 'jealous, bitter' etc. They also have had so many people treat them with so much kindness that when they encounter somebody who treats them like the average joe, and assume (if it's a woman) that she must be jealous. If it irks them so much when women are catty towards them then they can come together with us and deconstruct lookism to the best of our ability, thus in turn removing capitilism, patriachy and so on. But they won't because they know the pros outway the cons for them.

Tbh most people who I've encountered who have catty, condescending and rude have been pretty women. I think just a quick look online can show numerous pretty women with horrible personalities. They know they have a privilege and I wish we could take that away for a day, and let them see how geniunely awful it is to be an ugly woman.

Sadly when you begin to talk about how badly ugly women are treated they shut their ears wiggle their heads saying nope, it's your problem you have no confidence. I knew this Naomi (light skin) who claimed to be a humanitarian and caring about mental health and individual struggles to be extra likable and I tried to talk about the struggles I face, and she had the "amused" facial expression and told me that all women get the same treatment and ugly girls or their problems are non existent. Mind you while I was telling her about problems that I as an ugly girl go through and others, she had the most unamused facial expression only to act shock in the end. These women know the pros of being attractive outweigh the cons yet they'll play "muh don't know what you are talking about" card. They know it and I respect someone like Cynde Black who acknowledged the fact.

PS: This Naomi lives off a betabuxx as well.. No shit freaking Sherlock.

Give me pretty problems any day

DeerFieldObserver #sexist freerepublic.com

WILMINGTON, Del. - A sixth-grade science teacher who was accused of having sex with a 13-year-old student has been sentenced to 10 years in prison.

Rachel L. Holt, 35, had pleaded guilty to second-degree rape. She sobbed in court Friday as Superior Court Judge Calvin L. Scott gave her the mandatory minimum sentence.

Prosecutors had wanted Scott to sentence Holt to the maximum of 25 years.

Holt was initially charged with 28 counts of first-degree rape.

Police accused her of having sex with the boy that many times during an intense weeklong affair. She was also accused of plying the boy with alcohol and allowing him to drive her car.


There is a double standard between boys and girls because the two sexes are very different.

I think justice would have called for her to be in jail fo 18 months and 5 years of probation. This sentence is ridiculous.


I think cases like this undermine the seriousness of "real" instances of rape.
I'm talking about when a stranger attacks a woman and holding a knife to her assaults her. We all agree the rapist should be dropped in the nearest wood chipper.

The teacher, while not being an exemplary role model, is a far cry from the rapist holding a knife at some woman's throat.

This woman does not belong in jail, or in a classroom. Let's spend our prison dollars on real rapists.

Robert Lindsay #fundie robertlindsay.wordpress.com

[This was one of his comments on his own post which was called "Queers Recruit".]

Well this was back around the 1970's-1980's.

Friendships are impossible with these guys. They never stop trying to fuck me. Even bisexual guys. I tell them I’m straight and it never stops them. They just keep on trying. You either have to end the friendship or kill them. A few times I felt like killing them, honestly.

Gay men are way healthier than most seriously bisexual guys. Most of the bi guys I’ve known were kind of fucked in the head, and their almost all head-fucked about their bisexuality, generally they are in denial about it. One guy was a neighbor and he kept trying to fuck me. I ended the friendship rather violently. The cops got called and everything. I took a baseball bat and put a fuckin hole in his front door! Leave me alone, faggot!

Well, that put a stop to that. Then I told people he was bi. He was furious! He was NOT bisexual! He was going to kick my ass for saying that. A lot of those guys are like that. They fuck guys, but if you point it out, they get furious and threaten to kick your ass.

And a LOT of them are married too, and even have kids, often young kids. Really weird. I just met another one the other day. I was flattered that a beautiful 28 year old human wanted to fuck me, but it was the wrong damned gender!

I see why guys do it though. Sex with guys is so easy. Easy as filling up your gas tank. Getting sex from women is such a hassle a lot of the time.

Sharpe #racist niggermania.net

I just had a very unpleasant and bitter argument with an old friend, on the subject of niggers kneeling while the US anthem was played at sports grounds. He is of the opinion that the poor niggers have been victimised and brutalised by the police, and refuses to accept that, in the US, nigs are responsible for over 50% of all violent crime, despite comprising only about 14% of the population.

Even when I pointed out that those crime statistics include nigger-on-nigger, crime, he would not accept that the police are just taking appropriate measures to protect the victims.

He's not a bad person, just inexperienced in the ways of the nigger. He now thinks that I'm a racist. I'm aware of forum rules, but I don't think that I'm human-bashing when I state that there are many like him. Through no fault of their own, they are completely uninformed, and have no idea of the severity of the situation.

I'd like to try to save the friendship. Can anyone suggest an online resource that, factually and with empirical, unbiased evidence, demonstrates the true nature of the nig-nog?

allecto #fundie users.livejournal.com

A Rapist's View of the World: Joss Whedon and Firefly
This is a really long rant about Joss Whedon's Firefly. Why? Because I'm angry and I think it is really important that feminists don't leave popular culture out of the equation. Especially considering that popular culture is increasingly being influenced by pornography.

***

I have become increasingly interested in examining Joss Whedon’s work from a feminist perspective since I had a conversation with another lesbian feminist sister at the International Feminist Summit about whether Joss was a feminist. I am really quite shocked by how readily Joss is accepted as a feminist, and that his works are widely considered to be feminist. I decided to start re-watching Buffy: The Vampire Slayer and also to watch Firefly and the movie Serenity.

I have to say that now that I have subjected myself to the horror that is Firefly, I really am beyond worried about how much men hate us, given that this was written by a man who calls himself a feminist.

I find much of Joss Whedon’s work to be heavily influenced by pornography, and pornographic humour. While I would argue that there are some aspects of Buffy: The Vampire Slayer that are feminist and progressive, there is much that isn’t and I find it highly problematic that there are many very woman-hating messages contained within a show that purports itself as feminism. But Firefly takes misogyny to a new level of terrifying. I am really, really worried that women can call the man who made this show a feminist.

For myself, I’m not sure that I will recover from the shock of watching the malicious way in which Joss stripped his female characters of their integrity, the pleasure he seemed to take from showing potentially powerful women bashed, the way he gleefully demonized female power and selfhood and smashed women into little bits, male fists in women’s faces, male voices drowning out our words.

There is so much hatred towards women contained within the scripts and action of the series that I doubt very much that this post will even begin to cover it. I am going to try to focus on the episodes that were written by Joss Whedon but I will also refer to the series as a whole. As Joss Whedon was responsible for the concept development and was a producer, ultimately I hold him accountable for the depiction of women in the entire season. Only one episode was written by a woman. It was no better or worse in its depiction of women than the ones written by men.

The pilot episode, Serenity, was written and directed by Joss Whedon. The basic plot of the series is Malcolm Reynolds and his second in command Zoe, have made a new life for themselves after fighting a war against the Alliance, which they lost. They bought a Firefly, an old space ship, and Mal calls it Serenity, after the last battle they fought for the Independence. The pilot of the ship, Wash, is Zoe’s husband. Kaylee is the ship’s mechanic and Jayne, the final member of the crew, is the brainless brawn. This bunch of criminals go around stealing things and generally doing lots of violence.

They also take on board passengers. There is Inara, a Companion (Joss Whedon’s euphemism for women in prostitution). She rents one of the ship’s shuttles. Simon, a doctor and his sister River. And a Shepherd (which means preacher), a black male character.

The first scene opens in a war with Mal and Zoe. Zoe runs around calling Mal ‘sir’ and taking orders off him. I roll my eyes. Not a good start.

The next scene is set in the present. Mal, Jayne, and Zoe are floating about in space. They come into some danger. Mal gets all panicky.

Zoe says, “This ship's been derelict for months. Why would they –”

Mal replies, (in Chinese) “Shut up.”

So in the very second scene of the very first episode, an episode written and directed by the great feminist Joss, a white man tells a black woman to ‘shut up’ for no apparent reason. And she does shut up. And she continues to call him sir. And takes his orders, even when they are dumb orders, for the rest of the series.

The next scene we meet Kaylee, the ship’s mechanic. <- Lookee, lookee, feminist empowerment. In this scene Mal and Jayne are stowing away the cargo they just stole. Kaylee is chatting to them, happily. Jayne asks Mal to get Kaylee to stop being so cheerful. Mal replies, “Sometimes you just wanna duct tape her mouth and dump her in the hold for a month.” Yes, that is an exact quote, “Sometimes you just wanna DUCT TAPE HER MOUTH and DUMP HER IN THE HOLD FOR A MONTH.” Kaylee responds by grinning and giving Mal a kiss on the cheek and saying, “I love my Captain.”

What the fuck is this feminist man trying to say about women here? A black woman calling a white man ‘sir’. A white male captain who abuses and silences his female crew, with no consequences. The women are HAPPY to be abused. They enjoy it. What does this say about women, Joss? What does this say about you? Do you tell your wife to shut up? Do you threaten to duct tape her mouth? Lock her in the bedroom? Is this funny to you, Joss? Because it sure as fuck ain’t funny to me.

Our first introduction to Inara the ‘Companion’, Joss Whedon’s euphemism for prostituted women, is when she is being raped/fucked/used by a prostitutor. I find it really interesting to read the scripted directions for this particular scene:

We are close on INARA's face. She is being made love to by an eager, inexperienced but quite pleasingly shaped young man. She is beneath him, drawing him to his climax with languorous intensity. His face buried in her neck.

He tightens, relaxes, becomes still. She runs her hand through is hair and he pulls from her neck, looks at her with sweaty insecurity. She smiles, a worldly, almost motherly sweetness in her expression. He rests his head on her breast, still breathing hard.

So, Joss Whedon refers to rapist/fuckers who buy women as sex, as ‘eager, inexperienced but pleasingly shaped’ who ‘make love’ to women in prostitution. Obviously, ‘love’ to men like Joss Whedon, requires female powerlessness, force and coercion. Women in prostitution enjoy the experience of being bought for sex. They feel ‘motherly’ towards the men who have just treated them as property and bought them as sex.

In Joss Whedon’s future world prostituted women are powerful and respectable. They go to an Academy, to train in the arts of being a ‘Companion’. They belong to a Guild which regulates prostitution, forces women to endure yearly health tests and comes up with rules to make prostitution sound empowering for women. For example, one Guild rule is that the ‘Companion’ chooses her rapist, not the other way around.

But there is one really big question that does not get answered. The women who ‘choose’ to be ‘Companions’ are shown as being intelligent, accomplished, educated, well-respected and presumably from good families. If a woman had all of these qualities and opportunities then why the fuck would she ‘choose’ to be a man’s fuck toy? Would being a fuck toy for hundreds of men give a woman like Inara personal fulfillment? Job satisfaction? A sense of purpose? Fulfill her dreams? Ambitions?

Money doesn’t seem to be the motivation behind Inara’s ‘choice’ to be a ‘Companion’, presumably she just ‘enjoys’ swanning around in ridiculous outfits. And being used as a fuck toy by men is seemingly a small price to pay for the pleasure.

At any rate, Inara’s apparent ‘power’ is merely a figment of Joss Whedon’s very sick imagination. In a later episode, Inara is shown to have set down three very specific rules in relation to her arrangement to hiring one of Mal’s shuttles as her base of operations. 1) No crew member, including the Captain would be allowed entrance to the shuttle without Inara’s express invitation. 2) Inara refuses to service the Captain nor anyone under his employ. And 3) the Captain cannot refer to Inara as a whore.
Mal agrees to all of these rules but he breaks every single one of them. Blatantly and deliberately. The third thing that Mal says in the first interaction between Inara and Mal is, “She’s a whore…” Does Inara stop him from calling her a whore? Nope. She just goes on smiling and being gracious. So he calls her a whore again. Lovely man this Mal is, dontcha think?

And in regards to her first rule, Mal takes every opportunity he can to break it. In the first episode Mal barges into Inara’s shuttle. The interchange goes like this:

Inara: What are you doing on my shuttle?

Mal: It's my shuttle. You rent it.

Inara: Then when I'm behind on the rent, you can enter unasked.

Scenes like this continue to occur for the rest of the series. Mal never apologises for breaking the terms of his agreement with Inara. And although Inara gets a little annoyed, she does not get really angry at the Captain for consistently undermining her power and invading her space. She tells the Captain to get out but he rarely complies. The point is that a man should never invade a woman’s personal space to begin with. Especially when he has been told expressly that he is not invited. But Mal delights in pointing out Inara’s powerlessness, it makes him feel all manly.

In regards to her servicing the crew, she begins to service the Captain and the male passengers of the ship from day one. The following is an excerpt from the script of Serenity. Book is a black male character. He is a Preacher and disapproves of Inara’s ‘profession’.

BOOK Is this what life is, out here?

INARA Sometimes.

BOOK I've been out of the abbey two days, I've beaten a Lawman senseless, I've fallen in with criminals... I watched the captain shoot a man I swore to protect. And I'm not even sure if I think he was wrong.

INARA Shepherd...

He is shaking a bit, tearing up.

BOOK I believe I just... (a pained smile) I think I'm on the wrong ship.

INARA Maybe. Or maybe you're exactly where you ought to be.

He lowers his head. She puts her hand on it, a kind of benediction. We hold on them a second.

It is clear from the outset that a large part of Inara’s service involves addressing issues of male inadequacy and fulfilling many other emotional needs of her clients. The ability to do this IS a resource and it is therefore a service that Inara must perform. BUT Inara services all of the male passengers and the Captain in this way. She also services Kaylee but the relationship between them is a little more reciprocal. In any case, Mal makes it pretty obvious that he expects his emotional needs to be serviced by Inara and she willingly obliges. Mal also allows the male passengers to demand her emotional services and does not tell them to stop, despite the terms of his agreement with Inara. Inara is not paid by any of these men for her time, energy and emotional support.

Beyond a shadow of a doubt, Joss uses his own wife in this way. Expects her to clean up his emotional messes. Expects her to be there, eternally supportive, eternally subservient and grateful to him in all his manly glory. I hope the money is worth it, Mrs. Whedon. But somehow I doubt that it is. No amount of money can buy back wasted emotional resources.

Aside from women being fuck toys, property and punching bags for the men, the women have very little importance in the series. I counted the amount of times women talk in the episode Serenity compared to the amount of times men talk. The result was unsurprising. Men: 458 Women: 175. So throughout the first episode men talk more than two and a half times as much as women do. And women talk mainly in questions whereas men talk in statements. Basically, this means that men direct the action and are active participants whereas women are merely observers and facilitators.

Given the fact that women are largely absent from the action and the dialogue of the majority of scenes it is unsurprising that the action onscreen is highly homoerotic. Men jostle with each other for power. Pushing each others buttons, and getting into scuffles. This intense homoeroticism is present from the outset as Mal asserts his rights as alpha male on the ship.

Completely unnecessary and unprovoked violence is a spontaneous result of this hypermasculinised male character. In Serenity, Mal enjoys using a character called Simon as his personal punching bag. In one scene he walks up to him and smashes him in the face, without any provocation or logical reason. In another scene Simon asks Mal a question and Mal smashes him the face again. No reason, no explanation, just violence. Violence is a part of the landscape throughout the whole series and Mal is often the instigator. He is constantly rubbing himself up against other men, and punishing wayward women, proving and solidifying his manliness through bashing the shit out of anyone and everyone.

Zoe, the token black woman, acts as a legitimiser. Her role is to support Mal’s manly obsession with himself by encouraging him, calling him ‘sir’, and even starting the fights for him. Zoe is treated as a piece of meat by both her husband (Wash, another white male) and the Captain. Wash and Mal fight each other for Zoe’s attention and admiration, both relying on her submission to them to get them hard and manly. In fact there is a whole episode, War Stories, devoted to Wash and Mal’s ‘rivalry’. By the word rivalry, I mean violent, homoerotic male/male courtship conducted over the body of a woman.

Zoe is not shown to have a personality of her own. She has no outside interests, no ideas or beliefs, no conversation with anyone other than Wash or Mal. She has no female friends, in fact she tends to dislike women. For example, she is the first one to insult Saffron in the episode Our Mrs. Reynolds, calling her ‘trouble’.

Zoe, of course, is meant to be our empowered, ass-kicking sidechick. Like all sidechicks she is objectified from the get go. Her husband, Wash, talking about how he likes to watch her bathe. Let me just say now that I have never personally known of a healthy relationship between a white man and a woman of colour. I have known a black woman whose white husband would strangle and bash her while her young children watched. My white grandfather liked black women because they were ‘exotic’, and he did not, could not treat women, especially women of colour, like human beings. I grew up watching my great aunts, my aunty and my mother all treated like shit by their white husbands, the men they loved. So you will forgive me for believing that the character, Wash, is a rapist and an abuser, particularly considering that he treats Zoe like an object and possession.

Joss Whedon does not share my view, of course, and he paints the relationship between Zoe and Wash as a perfectly happy, healthy union. If anyone is interested in portrayals of relationships between white men and black women written from black women’s point of view, I would suggest watching Radiance, Rabbit-Proof Fence and Serenades, skip Joss Whedon’s shit.

Also if you are interested in the reality of women in prostitution/prostituted women rather than the candy floss version that Joss Whedon has produced, I highly recommend Rebecca’s story Lie Dead. Skip Joss Whedon’s women-hating bile.

I can assure you that this is just the beginning of my rant on Firefly. There is so much more disturbing stuff later in the series. In particular, an episode called Our Mrs. Reynolds, another episode written by Joss, which completely demonises women as well as pornifying male violence against us.

Leonard Sisyphus Mann #fundie consentinghumans.wordpress.com

Though most paedophile-child relationships are chaste there is a significant proportion in which the child wishes for, and consents to, intimacy.

One of the fallacious uses of language common in the popular discourse round this issue is to talk about paedophiles wanting, or having, ‘Sex’ with children. To most non-paedophiles ‘sex’ means ‘intercourse’ and so by a leap of logic the public thinks of paedophiles as wanting to have intercourse with children. This is wrong. What the typical paedophiles think of as ‘sex’ differs from what adult teleiophiles consider as ‘sex’.

The most important difference is that any form of penetration cannot have the same place it has in adult-adult relationships: the typical paedophile would not wish to do anything that the child would not enjoy, be hurt by or that would betray the trust and friendship shared by the adult and child.

Rather than the adult imposing his desires on the child it is very much about allowing the child to determine what takes place and responding to the child’s interest, – much as an adult playing football with a 7-year old adapts his mode of play to ensure that the experience is enjoyable and constructive for the child so does a caring paedophile.

Essentially what most ‘turns on’ a paedophile is a happy, relaxed child who is herself turned-on and enjoying herself – forcing or manipulating a child would be repugnant to the normal paedophile.

‘Sexual’ activities, if they occur at all, range from playful sensuality (tickling, kissing and stroking…) to acts that would be classed as ‘foreplay’ in the context of adult-adult sex.

eekkggsghost & OutOfPlatitudes #sexist reddit.com

(OK, this seems to actually be a woman agreeing with an incel)

(eekkggsghost)
The more I interact with women online the more I agree with this is sub

I'm a total shut-in, but in the past year I've talked with many women through this sub and reddit, and what can I say, I'm rather disappointed. I've never gotten any attention from anybody before, let alone women, so things were great for a while, but then certain patters started to emerge as they shared more and more.

Said patters are:

Complaining about no guy wants them while they have a rich dating history and dozens to hundreds of matches on dating sites.

Claiming they've dated man uglier than them... and then they show me their pictures. The guy is always on their level or higher. I've only encountered one exception to this, and she's a 9.5/10, he's an 8.5/10. I'm now convinced than women are incapable of determining the attractiveness of their partner.

Many of these girls have or have had sugar daddies. These completely average looking girls are getting paid thousands of dollars. Often they don't even have to have sex. It's ridiculous.

Almost all of them have high n-count in the dozens, some even 50<. Fucking loads of guys when they are young then finding a provider later is very common. Although in my experience it's not about money. It's about the urge to have children and fear of being alone.

Braking up for little to no reason. When they get bored with someone they'll find the smallest little detail to break up, knowing full well they'll be with a different guy in a week.

Complaining about "severe" or "very bad" social skills or anxieties, while having a rich social life and going out with friends/BF all the time. I understand that they perceive it as such, but come on.

Only wanting to talk about their problems and disappearing when I tried to talk about similar issues of my own.

Staying in abusive relationships for who knows what reason.

Braking promises and not being able to be on time. But that's because they don't like me and only want to interact with me to show how nice and good they are, as a form of charity.

Saying how they don't care about looks yet going on and on about what their BF/ex looks/looked like(I have to say that women's tastes seem to be slightly more varied than what this sub believes, not by much though). Same with large cocks.

I have to say these are my PERSONAL experiences of the last 12 months with women I met on reddit, and never in real life. The only exceptions to these seem to be women with health issues.

(OutOfPlatitudes)
I think part of the problem is meeting those women on this board.

Non-incels come here and it's really hard for them to understand. I think it's especially hard for women.

I think even normie guys can sort of empathize if they aren't too caught up in white knighting. They might not agree, but I think many can recognize, if they had been born with a less fortunate face, they could have been an Incel too...even if they don't agree with you.

Women, on the other hand, come here and see how we're vilified, called retarded, told we're stupid and will always pick a Chad and never pick an incel. We're called the 'ez mode' gender when everywhere else is all on board the feminism train. That makes them pissed off because, "I am not like that!!" "Not all women do that!!"

To be fair I don't think ALL women cuck and throw away good relationships for 1 night stands with a Chad...but I also think women are in denial about how common that actually is. We love our Chads, but we don't want to admit we wouldn't love them or even have given them a chance if they were much lower on the looks match scale as us. So instead we say 'looks don't matter'.

Incels call that out as bullshit and women usually double down saying everyone can find someone if they look hard enough.

They see Incels talking about killing themselves, how much pain they are in and "LDAR". I think this bothers women more than men because women want to think they can fix an incel.

I imagine that your friendships go something like this:

1) Woman's ego is hurt seeing a whole group of men who think all women, including her, are terrible.

2) Woman feels bad about herself and sees "black pillers" as just hurt & the right woman hasn't come along and they will change their mind. She's also mad because she doesn't see herself the way Black Pillers do.

3) Woman tries to talk to Incels. Either defends women or gives platitudes/advice for hope/etc...gets told to fuck off and she's an idiot etc. At this point she either leaves or she sticks around because she really wants to be liked

4) She tries to strike up a conversation. Many incels don't go for this and tell the woman to fuck off but eventually, /u/eekkggsghost or someone like him gives them a chance to converse.

5) Despite being black pill, the hope of attention means the Incel tries to be a friend. The woman likes the attention and that she isn't one of the 'bad ones' now. She likes the 'feel good' of perhaps changing a black piller's mind about women, or at least about her.

6) Her ego is sufficiently restored. But she doesn't want to date an Incel. She might like an Incel's friendship...but over time it's likely to be a frustrating friendship for both sides.

7) Incel leans heavily on the friendship because he desires friendship/companionship more than she does (supply & demand). He may want a relationship and overstep boundaries but more likely than not the Incel will stay frustratingly friend zoned and accept that.

8) No longer needing validation...the woman will realize being friends with someone who is depressed & LDAR isn't easy or fun.

9) At this point is when they are harder to get ahold of, or they'll tell you their problems but stop listening to yours, stop showing up on time or leave you hanging by committing to all plans with 'maybe' and only show if there's nothing better to do.

10) Eventually, this will spark a fight & the friendship will end. Woman will feel justified because she's constantly feeling dragged down by a high maintenance friendship & Incel will feel justified in agreeing with Black Pill beliefs.

Except incels supporting other incels, I don't think people can make healthy friendships in a subreddit like this. It'll probably end 95% of the time with friendships who's core is tied up in the misery of being an incel.

I think if you keep talking to women you meet on this subreddit, or through things about Incels/black pill, you'll continue to see the same pattern you've been observing.

(eekkggsghost)
That's a perfect summary.

But she doesn't want to date an Incel

I kinda disagree with this, just a little bit. There are a handful of people who got into relationships through this sub. I believe some of these women I'm talking about were actually willing to at least sleep with me(... that's pretty hard to do from thousand of miles away though). Some girls are turned on be the idea of being the first for someone, even if it's just a fantasy. And one I believe would have dated me, if we lived in the same place. I mean it would have been a disaster, yes, but I KNOW she was genuine. Misguided, delusional, but genuine.

Theodore Shoebat #conspiracy rightwingwatch.org

Radical anti-LGBTQ activist Theodore Shoebat posted a video last night reacting to the news that Fox News had fired Bill O’Reilly amid multiple sexual harassment complaints and settlements. In response to the development, Shoebat claimed that it was unlikely that O’Reilly had ever sexually harassed anyone and that the entire thing was a conspiracy to fill Fox News with pro-gay “closet Nazis.”

“I don’t buy that bullshit,” Shoebat said. “I don’t buy it for a second. I think that is simply a reason, it’s an excuse to get rid of him, it’s really a pretext to get rid of Bill O’Reilly. I don’t think that they just felt so bad for these women. I doubt Bill O’Reilly sexually harassed anybody.”

Shoebat said that after looking into the story, “I did indeed find a conspiracy.”

“My suspicion,” he said, “is that the reason why they’re getting rid of Bill O’Reilly is that they want to get rid of all the old cats in the news business at Fox News. They want to get rid of all the old cats and replace them with people who are more pro-homosexual, they’re explicitly pro-homosexual, they’re pro-perversion and they are also—they could be, that is—closet Nazis.”

Projecting My Psychopathy Award

Chopper9760 #fundie boards.straightdope.com

These questions come up in my mind when I've spent all day watching a Law & Order marathon.

On this show, people perjure themselves all the time to protect mothers, fathers, siblings, children (rarely spouses), and when at the very end of the episode, the detectives drag the truth out of them (namely, that they knew all along that mom, dad, sis, son was, in fact the murderer), they say, as if it's obvious and self-explanatory, "BUT SHE'S MY MOTHER," or fill in the other first-degree relative.

So I'm asking: would you perjure yourself in court to protect your parent, sibling, or child, knowing they were guilty?

Separate question: would you take the rap (jail) for your guilty parent, sibling, or child? (I'm presuming you wouldn't take the death penalty.)


I'd perjure myself for my folks but I don't think I'd take a murder rap nor would they let me.

might not agree with my dad for killing my neighbor with a snow shovel but if I could convince myself that he wasn't going to kill ALL my neighbors w/ snow shovels, I'd probably help him get away with it.

I think David Kaczynski was a hero but I'd have to be convinced my folks were a danger to society before I held up my social responsibility to rat on them. I'm selfish that way.

As for sex crimes, well, I figure my family's experience with sex crimes has informed my opinion of killing people.

Serious? Even if he did it without any real justification?What you think there's some special legal or moral privilege that attaches to having been a victim of sex crimes, that doesn't count for murder? I don't. And I've been a victim.

Bear in mind that I haven't advocated my actions from a legal, moral, or even a logical standpoint. Obviously everyone should be held to the same standard of justice.

That being said, are you really surprised that I value my loved ones more than the social contract? I picked an extreme example as a way of finding my own personal limit. I would imagine I'd be quite conflicted if I knew Mom or Dad killed someone with no provocation. However, if I saw an opportunity to get them out of trouble I would take it.

I haven't murdered the sex offenders in my own family but I'm not going to be upset if someone else does. I only raised the sex crimes issue to point out a personal hard limit - I can wrap my mind around helping my folks get away with murder but I could never defend them if they committed a sex crime.


So you're saying you're advocating actions you, yourself, think are immoral and illogical?
So you've never made a choice that you knew was wrong? I have a hard time believing you've seriously considered the hypothetical.

I'm saying that I would, in certain circumstances, chuck my morals and rationality for 2 people in a world of, what, 6,000,000,000? That doesn't make me an asshole, that makes me a normal member of society.

You nailed it earlier when you mentioned the justice system. LEO's aren't supposed to investigate family, your relations won't end up in the jury box and our spouses are often exempt from testifying. We've built our society with an acknowledgement of the importance of familial relationships.

MrDibble, I think you have unrealistic expectations of yourself and others. Further, I think slightly irrational balls-to-the-wall loyalty for a small number of people is just as important as trying to be a good global citizen.


View Post

Really, it boils down to a simple question - how can anyone justify helping someone get away with murder? "Because they're family" doesn't quite have enough of an explanatory power to me. Why should it?

Justify is perhaps a poor word choice as we've posited the example of someone we know is guilty. The choice to commit perjury is inherently unjustified no matter what crime we're talking about, that's why it's perjury.

Why would I (in some circumstances) perjure myself so a loved one could escape a murder charge they were guilty of? Because I'd rather have my loved one free and not in prison. Because I value my family over society.

I'm not going to break that way every time but I can imagine doing it.

Tiredpoorcel #sexist #psycho incels.co

[LifeFuel] I made a Landwhale whore cry today. Also please touch this IT so next time ill touch foids instead.

So as you all know from my name. I am poor. AF. So today is my once a month taco day (yes i am so poor i eat fast food once a month). So i went to my typical place (not too fancy and didn't have cameras to record me) cause they make good tacos. Also ps: the tacos aren't really tacos they are like huge fat sandwiches. Anyways so as soon as i enter i saw a hijabless (i know AWALT but if she was hijabi i wouldn't bully her cause i respect her dad for not letting her be a whore) 300pound or so hexagon faced triple chin white whore. And as you all know the only thing that is worse than a foid is a triple sized one. So she ordered 2 tacos 2 burgers french fries and a large milkshake and sat infront of me eating like she was in a desert for years and never had a meal. So then i am like disgusted af and pissed cause she is obviously a spoiled fucking whore. So i kept penetrating her with my eyes. Not breaking eye contact for a single second and laughing at her until she started getting red and feeling uncomfy af and id wipe my mouth even tho i didn't have food on it so id make fun of her. At that point after 10 minutes i started seeing tears forming on her eyes which got me more interested in making her life hell so i stand up and went to the cashier thing paid for my cheap ass tacos then as i was exiting i went next to her, called her a pig spitting on the floor next to her and kicked the table spilling the milkshake on her black pants. And i kept looking at her while exiting and she was crying and sobbing loudly, exactly like you see fat whores crying in movies. And as i was exiting i heard her call for help from the manager or whatever and at that point i was already out. SO I GUESS I NEED TO FIND A NEW PLACE TO EAT. BUT IT WAS WORTH IT.

So this is going to be my hobby from now on. Bullying foids by any means necessary.

Also yes IT. I am a dick. And if you touch this itll be worse next time.Yes i am a dick and my pewsonalityy is awful :soy: But i love it.

Emily Elizabeth Windsor-Cragg #conspiracy facebook.com

“A King’s Story” out of shame was fake news ... to protect the Crown.
Tuesday, February 28, 2017
This is a faked autobiography that leaves out everything connected to character. It does actually reveal that George V says to Edward: "If you do not accept an arranged marriage, I will not give permission to marry."
Penned in 1952 by a ghost writer, this account leaves out all Prince Edward's suspicions as well as the back-and-forth conspiracies being kept between Edward and his Royal Family
1. It leaves out what really happened to Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence, at Glamis Castle and what happened to Prince John (two versions of each outcome were circulated).
2. It leaves out half-brother Adolph's relation to the Royals and how Adolph affected King George V's reign.
3. It leaves out the trauma-based mind control Royal sons experience as part of their initiation into Satanism, which Edward did not accept nor adapt to and also, it leaves out Edward's reaction to shame, which in his 30s was to adopt cross-dressing as a statement of his humiliation.
4. It leaves out the meetings of Edward with Elizabeth Bowes Lyon that ended in his spurning her and her seeking revenge for the rest of his life. It leaves out that Consorts like Bowes Lyon were customarily chosen by the Royal Family beforehand and groomed for the job as self-serving Satanists (as QAlexandra, QMary and Prince Philip all were).
5. It leaves out the Rothschild takeover of Western Banking, with the establishment of the US Federal Reserve, after the sinking of the Titanic. This step created Funny Money to be used in Masonic wars.
6. It leaves out the betrayal of Czar Nicholas II, Geo V's favorite cousin, the alleged death of Prince John, and the institutionalization of Bowes-Lyon's two cousins for no violation of civil norm..
7. It leaves out the Saxe-Colburg-Gotha name change in 1917 that totally alienated Adolph from his father George V.
8. It leaves out all mention of the suspicious death of King George V and of his strange funeral service in which the family were absent, but two Armies--both German and British--officiated. In this way, it left out completely Edward's fear that his father's cabal were about to kill him.
9. It leaves out Edward's discovery in 1934 that Wallis had worked for his Father King George V from 1917-1921 as a UK-German double agent and her replacement, Claudia Ruth O’Keeffe, sister of artist Georgia O’Keeffe, a virtual doppelganger for Wallis Warfield Simpson.
10. It leaves out the Royals' use of doppelgangers to replace themselves and the Duke of Windsor after he left and when they're not up to the job.
11. But worst of all, it leaves out his five children: Pierre-Edward, 1918; Elizabeth1, 1934; Margaret, 1939; Andrew, 1943 in Canada, and Elizabeth2 in San Francisco 1944.

Michael ChristisKing #fundie books.google.com

As we continued to walk I could notice the structures, the street names and some other things in this part of town looked very similar to the prosperous house we just left. But here I could see that even the trees that lined the streets were dead or dying. The streets were littered with trash and there were potholes in almost every part of the road. This was quite a sight. As we made our final turn toward our destination, it dawned on me that we were revisiting the same house of prayer but many years after our first visit. I saw people everywhere. But these people had pain and anxiety written on their faces.

When we got to the building, the first remarkable thing I saw were security guards. They were all over the place. They were pushing people around, suspecting, harassing and policing everyone. They were checking the bags of those that were coming in and of those that were going out.

The first level we walked into was the hall of shields. This is where the gold shields, gold bars, gold plates, and all kinds and forms of gold were. This is the same level that had all kinds of precious stones of indescribable value. When we walked into this level everything still looked the same. The shining, the glittering and the throne were still there, but the weight of the glory that I experienced at this level was absent. I could not tell what was missing because everything seemed to be in its place, but the visible joy and the freedom that was present was not there. There was a guard standing by every shield and every precious thing. Before I could open my mouth to ask any question Wisdom said, “This is not gold, this is wood and other cheap metals. They look like gold because they are painted to look like gold. The gold items and all those precious stones that were here are gone. They were taken away by Shishak, the spirit of this world. They are replaced by cheap articles that look like the real thing. The absence of the glory left the building vulnerable and made it possible for the thieves to steal the precious things of the house of the Lord. Because the glory is gone there is great anxiety in the house. The custodians of the house have taken great measures and devised strategies to secure the house, but these strategies were not of the Lord. Come and I will show you more.” He then took me from one level to another. It was a very sad experience. This house has been raped of her glory and her precious oils were gone. Her maternity ward was baby-less. It was depressingly silent. They turned it into a library filled with books on how to make babies but the few cribs left here were empty. What used to be filled with new babies everyday was now empty. Then I saw men and women walking around on this level with swollen bellies. They were either too weak to push out their overdue and dying babies, or their big and bulging bellies were filled with empty wind.

Part of the maternity was now being used by an army of psychologists. These were recruited by the present custodians of the house to teach fruitless adults how to manage their lives and how to be satisfied with their barren lives. These miserable counselors insisted that it was the will of the King that they should remain childless and that their contentment as childless citizens will actually glorify the King. The main concern of the people on this floor was for themselves. This was now a house of selfishness. There was no zeal for the glory of the Lord of Hosts. They had a “good” explanation for why this disease of shame, emptiness and barrenness afflicted this holy place. The aim of these explanations was to comfort and keep the saints from the holy restlessness that causes them to cry out day and night. Yet there were those among them that would rather die than remain barren one more day.

As if the story of the maternity ward were not bad enough, I walked into the once House of Bread. There was hardly any bread here. The only bread here was brought in from the outside and many waited in line to have a little piece of it. Of all the levels, this was where the problem of this house was most noticeable. I could not stop crying for the sadness and the starvation on the faces that I saw in the House of Bread. This was too much for me to bear; my sobbing turned into a loud and audible cry. I wept and kept asking the question why? Why? Why can’t someone bake some bread? Where are the fruit for the fruit table and those that hung on the walls? Where are the dishes that use to be here for the hungry to be fed? The water fountains that lined the walls of the halls were still there looking better than ever. But there was no water coming from them. The few that had water coming from them were either too dirty or too lukewarm to swallow and they could not quench anyone’s thirst. I was weeping, brokenhearted, and drenched with tears. There was no food in the house of the Lord. As the poor were struggling to manage the little bread left in one part of this level, another group of people were in a different part of the level selling and buying bread. They were making deals with the rich to serve them the bulk of the bread in the house.

Then Wisdom put His hand on my shoulder and said, “Let me take you to where the problem is.” We walked to the basement level. As we entered into this level Wisdom said, “The fresh bread that was served at the fifth level of the house was baked here and so was every good thing of this house. They all came through this level.” I noticed that the couches and beds that used to be on the seventh floor were now in the basement floor. Also the fancy conference tables were here on this floor. The office equipment and chairs were also here. Those who were supposed to be praying were either sleeping or too busy with many of life’s very important demands. They pushed prayer out of their schedules and considered it too unimportant to invest their precious hours, resources and manpower. They were still very diligent and displayed a great skill in management and administration of the house. In their wisdom they almost had everything in place. They had a good explanation for the things that were not in place. But the present leaders of this house never admitted that the lack of all-out prayer was the source of the present distress. Those that admitted it never had enough courage to do anything about it. And yet some of them completely denied the existence of any problems at all. “All is well, we have it under control,” is their response
Most of the engine room was now turned into classrooms and a library for the knowledge of everything; there were books everywhere I looked. The people I saw at this level were very busy, serious- looking, and well-dressed people.

KingOfRome #sexist incels.co

A way to make institutionalized sexual slavery safe and humane

Surgically insert a microchip that makes them more comfortable with their situation into their brains. We would call it "The Empathy Chip" or "The Friendship Chip". It would be installed through a safe, pain-free procedure with a failure rate of less than 10% through exhaustive testing on irredeemably defective subjects. It would cure them of their cluster B personality disorders, allowing them to assess the attractiveness of themselves and others more fairly, improve their listening and communication skills, and empathize with their life partners, all without the need for negative reinforcement.

In fact, "sexual slavery" wouldn't quite be the right term for it with this sort of arrangement in place, as their participation in the system would be voluntary and without cruelty, not to mention how vulgar the term is. More accurate would be terms like "equitable companionship" or "shared sexual liberty".

Your thoughts on this?

Rabbi Aharon Ramati and eight unnamed female accomplices #fundie #psycho timesofisrael.com

A Jerusalem man who was arrested Monday on suspicion of running a cult in which dozens of women and young children lived in exploitative and slave-like conditions was named Tuesday as Aharon Ramati.

The 60-year-old self-described rabbi, who runs the Be’er Miryam seminary, is also suspected of sexually exploiting the women, Hebrew-language media reported.

Ramati was ordered to remain in prison Monday for seven days.

Police said the community operated for years in the Bukharim Quarter, in Jerusalem’s city center, under the guise of a women’s seminar. In it, some 50 women lived in a state of overcrowding, deprivation and poor sanitation. Many had children — a total of about ten — aged one to five, who were held in seclusion within the compound on a regular basis.

Authorities said the leader of the suspected cult controlled the women’s lives with absolute authority, isolating them from their families and society at large and punishing them for transgressions through various means. The women were employed in jobs approved by Ramati, and some of their wages were transferred directly to him.

[...]

The police official alleged that the arrested women took an active part in abusing the victims.

“They humiliated them,” he said. “One of them would regularly put their fingers in the fire to ‘simulate hell.'” In another case, he said, one of the female suspects forced a hot pepper into the mouth of one of the victims.

Ramati was arrested in 2015 over similar suspicions but was subsequently released after members of the alleged cult testified in his favor.

Monday’s arrest came after a number of women who left the community came forward to testify against the man and following months of a clandestine investigation into the community.

Ramati has rejected the accusations against him.

Laura Louder & Moira Greyland Peat #fundie survivingtherainbow.com

(Laura’s Preface: I’m honored and grateful to God that I can call Moira my friend. I met her through mutual friends, and we struck up an acquaintance which has grown into an important – for me – friendship. I don’t know many people who manifest the courage and faith this woman has done, although I think it’s a matter of standing up and being strong or go through life being a victim, weak and defeated; this is an option that is simply antithetical to what I know of Moira’s spirit. Both her parents were gay, and quite notorious for it. She suffered terrible abuses from both of them, and now has joined the growing ranks of Children of Gays who are speaking out in prophet voices to tell all the rest of us that, despite the gay-controlled rhetoric, homosexuality is bad for children. She’s generously written this for Surviving the Rainbow, and I hope she’ll be writing more.)

What can the straight spouses of gay parents do to protect their children?

I have been asked to respond to this question, and I admit I am at a loss. This question is not about Spouse A being right and Spouse B being wrong. It is about humanity splitting itself in two, usually for completely stupid reasons, and the devastation it wreaks upon the children.

When a spouse, usually a wife, discovers she is married to a man who has decided to pursue a gay lifestyle, she is already enduring her own heartbreak, shock, and betrayal.

Not only will her children be enduring the likely destruction of their home life, but they will be asked to endure a culture shock which will force them to confront adult questions that no child should be forced to endure.

It is bad enough to know your parent has left your other parent for an ordinary relationship. When your parent abandons his former faith, his wedding vows, and his cultural norms and values, the child is in a position of having to choose, which amounts to choosing one’s left hand or one’s right hand.

Socially, children will generally choose the path which minimizes the negative repercussions. It is understandable both to want to avoid conflict and to want to continue to be a “fan” of the straying parent.

Watching the heartbreak of the abandoned parent is awful, but cannot silence questions about the whole situation. If Mom was abandoned, thinks the child, did she do something wrong? After all, our parents are both right, they have to be, or the entire world is split in two.

Most likely the children will feel forced to choose, even if this choice has nothing whatsoever to do with either objective reality or with their own interest. Male children may choose to side with the father, because it is emotional suicide to reject the primary male figure in their lives, even if he is tarnished beyond belief.

In my own family, my brother chose my father over my mother, which in some ways made sense, because he was kinder and less cruel. In other ways, it made no sense at all, because he brought home a long succession of teen and preteen boys for sex, and he endlessly pressured my brother to have sex with them—and with him.

I also chose my father in some ways, because he was less cruel than my mother. But ultimately, I chose neither one, because neither one chose me.

We learn how to be people from our parents. When our parents choose sexual folly over keeping the home together, children learn that sex is more important than people, and much more important than we are. If our father rejects our mother, we learn that women are unimportant and can be abandoned on a sexual whim. If our mother rejects our father, we learn that men are disposable.

Most catastrophically, if our father decides to “become a woman,” it can provoke terrible anguish in the children. For both girls and boys, their father is literally gone, and “replaced” with a human who is doing disgraceful things for reasons which make no sense to a child. In a boy, it can cause them to fear that their own masculinity can be lost at any moment, and that they might inadvertently be turned into a woman. In a girl, it can make them conclude that no man will ever want them, because if their own father abandoned their mother and turned into a female, it must be because they have failed. Deep down, that failure will always be present, even if unspoken.

In my own family, where my father did not actually choose to “become a woman,” he absolutely refused masculine and feminine gender roles, which left me feeling like I was a nothing, neither male nor female. I was “less than” any boy, because he preferred boys for sex and denigrated girls for “wanting relationships.” If I was a girl. i was “one of them,” those foul creatures rejected by my father. Of course, my attempts to masquerade as a boy were never enough. I became adept at fencing, but any kind of fighting was too stereotypically masculine for my father, so again I had failed.

When a father leaves, either physically leaving the family, or by abandoning his gender for his sexual whims, the sun falls out of the sky for the children. Their very existence as males and females is called into question. Also, the mother is devastated by her own perceived failure and deep, deep grief.

If there is a custody battle, the children are figuratively torn in half for reasons that will never make sense. The wife is likely to be devalued even more in a divorce from a gay man than in an ordinary divorce, partly because of the legal climate, and partly because she will blame herself for failing so deeply as a woman that her man abandoned manhood and straight love altogether rather than remaining with her.

The children will naturally fear being abandoned by a gay spouse in their own future.

The original question was this: is there anything an abandoned wife of a gay man can do to protect her children? The answer is no, and a qualified yes.

We cannot stop the pain. We cannot stop the grief or the feelings of abandonment. We cannot stop the nightmare or the moral outrage. We cannot even stop the gay parent from allowing his new “friends” from terrorizing, molesting, or even raping the children.

In such a situation, what hope can I give?

We can stay aware that our children are hurt, and that their hurt must be handled as more important than our own. It is important as much as possible, to not allow them to see our grief in all of its fullness, not to allow them to think we are forcing them to take sides. Their relationship with their father is about learning their place in the universe, not about us.

What we must do is to remain a safe place. We have to be the one they can express their doubts and fears to. If they have to defend their father, they will be silencing their own agony to do so. This means we must be Switzerland, not taking any side but theirs. If their father commits a bad act, we must listen attentively, and respond from the perspective of helping them, not persecuting their father.

Even if their father is the worst villain imaginable, they will never abandon him. I know this, because my own father is a serial rapist of children, and I am the one who put him in prison for molesting an eleven year old boy in front of me.

I cannot abandon my father, even though he blamed me for his imprisonment, and he most certainly abandoned me. If that is my position as an adult, how likely is it that a child will be able to abandon a father for much smaller crimes?

We abandon our own hearts. We do not abandon our parents. All we can do is teach our children to pay attention to their own discomfort and encourage them to protect themselves against anything which feels wrong. We can also teach them to speak up firmly, even when they are afraid.

In a way, it feels like I am trying to explain to a fish how to be comfortable while being eaten by a shark. My advice might reduce the pain slightly, but we did not cause the injury, and we cannot prevent the pain altogether.

Let them see that you are not rejecting yourselves, nor will you reject them, even if they side with their father. It hurts, it is appalling, but it is unavoidable. Any boy around eight or nine is going to detach from Mother to a large degree and seek out his father as his primary role model. If his father is a horrible role model, telling him that will not alter his need for his father at all.

What you can do is to make sure your sons have better male role models in their lives, whether sports coaches, teachers who will mentor them properly, or relatives they have cause to admire. I did mention not telling them that you are doing this, yes? Just do it, and do not say why. The last thing they need to hear is that you are rejecting their father, because any rejection of him will feel internally like a rejection of them, no matter what you intend it to be.

My own sons identify strongly with their football coaches, thank God.

Above all, let your children know through your own conduct that being normally male and female is good and right, and that they have the right to be themselves, even if some people might want them to change into something else.

I wish I had more comfort to offer you.

All my best to you,
Moira Greyland Peat

Dean #fundie medium.com

i’m a Youth Worker, I’m a Paedophile
The idea of a paedophile working with children is, perhaps understandably, pretty controversial. This is the story of how I realised my attraction, learnt to live with it and why I’m going to keep working with kids.
I grew up in a coastal town in the UK with two very loving parents and my two younger siblings. I never had many friends and I was bullied a lot, but every week I went to a youth group. I always felt welcomed there. It gave me a safe environment in which to learn, grow and develop as a person, especially in my self confidence. My time there influenced me as a person more than anything else.

I’d already decided by age 10 that I wanted to give back and volunteer there as an adult. I took up a volunteer role when I turned 14 and it’s the best decision I ever made. Sure it’s a lot of work, sometimes it’s like a full time job and it’s only voluntary, but now I get to help children to grow and develop. I couldn’t ask for more than that.

Shortly after starting in my volunteer position I realised I was a paedophile.

Realisation
My sexuality developed pretty normally at first. I started to notice other boys my age when I was 8. Around 11 years old I figured I was gay. Fortunately at the time public attitudes toward homosexuality were changing pretty quickly and my close family was pretty openly accepting of gay people, so I was able to accept myself relatively easily.

But a year later I started to notice something was up. I was still attracted to boys six?—?or sometimes more?—?years younger than me. Why? It didn’t make any sense to me. Fortunately I was still attracted to enough of my peers that I could ignore it. So that’s what I did for two more years.

It wasn’t until I was 14 that I really started to realise the nature of my sexuality. I’d been getting older, but the boys I was attracted to hadn’t got older with me. In fact by this point all the boys I was attracted to were younger than me. I couldn’t ignore it anymore, I had to start accepting that this was the way I am.

To this day my attractions haven’t changed, I’m still attracted to boys from 4–13. I had no choice in the matter, I was born this way, but I did choose never to act on it and never to harm a child.

Acceptance
I was always a pretty scientifically minded kid. When I realised I was gay I asked myself why I was that way, what it was that made me different. Asking those questions it was pretty obvious to me that my sexuality was an unchosen and unchangeable part of myself. If it can’t be changed and it isn’t hurting anyone then I should just accept it and make the best of my situation.

I went through a very similar thought process when I realised I was a paedophile, so accepting it was pretty easy for me once I stopped trying to deny it. As long as I never hurt anyone what was the problem?

But there was a problem. My only knowledge of paedophilia was based on what society had always told me. Society was constantly telling me that I was doomed to be a monster. I knew I wasn’t a monster; I didn’t want to hurt a child and I knew I never would.

I went online to see if I could talk to others like me. Unfortunately the only other paedophiles I could find were pro-contacts, people that believe children can consent. I knew they were wrong, I’d heard about the damage CSA caused, I didn’t want to be like them and I didn’t want to associate with them, but I was bullied, depressed, suicidal, had no friends and desperately wanted someone to talk to about my attraction. So I talked to them. For many years they tried to push their beliefs onto me, but fortunately I never believed it.

I’d be lying if I said I was never tempted by them though. The idea that it’s okay to act on your attractions and that it’s society that causes the harm can be quite appealing. Especially to a young, depressed, suicidal teenager. Fortunately I always knew that what they were saying was wrong; I couldn’t ignore what I knew to be true: CSA causes devastating lifelong harm.

There was always the fear that someone would find out. What if someone did? I’d be hated by everyone, not even my family would accept me. I’d seen plenty of news stories about what people do to paedophiles. Harass them, beat them, even burn them alive just on suspicion of being a paedophile. If someone found out my life could be in danger. I had to keep this hidden from everyone in my real life. I couldn’t risk losing everything if someone found out. Even now, no one in my real life knows.

One day, early this year, I came across an article about people who called themselves “virtuous paedophiles”. This was a group of people like me that were paedophiles but were against all sexual contact with children. I started doing some reading and after a couple of weeks decided to join VirPed. I’d finally found a community that understood my attractions and shared my views. It was quite a relief; if only I had found them when I was 14.

Turning this into something positive
I’ve accepted my attractions and I know I will never harm a child, but now I’m in a position to help others. I’ve now joined a number of online communities for non-offending and anti-contact Minor Attracted People (MAPs), to help people trying to come to terms with their attractions, to show them that they aren’t monsters.

The hate, death threats and suicide bait non-offending MAPs see every day is staggering and sickening. Young teenagers are seeing those messages, internalising the belief that they are monsters; sometimes the hate pushes them over the edge. They often either kill themselves or get indoctrinated by pro-contacts which can lead to them being abused themselves, abusing kids or viewing child pornography. I want to show them that there is another way, before they get indoctrinated by pro-contacts, or give in to the hate.

Hopefully I can educate a few people along the way too and help to reduce the stigma surrounding paedophilia. When you are constantly told that you are destined to hurt a child it can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Contrary to popular belief, helping paedophiles accept themselves is helping keep children safe from abuse. The current stigma just forces paedophiles to hide and prevents them from seeking help if they need it, just increasing the risk they might offend. Demonizing paedophiles might make you feel good, but it’s not helping anyone.

Should I still work with kids?
Most people would say that a paedophile should never be around kids because we are just looking for opportunities to abuse them. That’s completely false. I’ve been working with kids since before I even realised I was a paedophile. I do it because I enjoy it. I have no ulterior motives. I know that my main job is to protect the children in my care and keep them safe; that is what I do. The absolute last thing I want is for a child to be harmed.

Being a paedophile doesn’t mean I lack the normal, protective instincts people have towards children. This is a very common misconception, but if anything, my protective instincts towards children are stronger than most people’s. I find I care more about them and I’m more interested in their well-being.

I love kids, I love working with kids, I’m very good at what I do, I do it because I want what is best for them and I want them to become the best people they can be.

CJL #fundie rr-bb.com

Those who call themselves atheists or agnostic are running from God. They are angry or hurt by an instance or circumstance in their life that they blame God for. Nope, no such thing as an atheist or agnostic. Just folks running from God.

UK Korean Friendship Association #fundie facebook.com

Stop the War Coalition (STWC) held a meeting on the tense situation on the Korean peninsula . From a KFA viewpoint the meeting was a bit hmm to say the least . The problem with STWC is that they believe in excluding and marginalising any pro DPRK , pro Juche view point .(KFA did offer to send a speaker but this was declined ) One of the positives of the meeting was that the warmongering and hype of the British media , including so-called 'liberal ' papers like the 'Guardian ' .They were some attempts to explain the context of the DPRK nuclear programme , it was correctly pointed out the US introduced nuclear weapons on to the Korean peninsula in 1957.

However where the meeting went seriously off track and ended up justifying US imperialism was when two of the speakers parroted the claim of the US to have withdrawn nuclear weapons from the Korean peninsula in early 1990s,. The US had deployed up to 1750 nuclear weapons in south Korea at one time and the figure averages at around 1,000. The US took a NEITHER CONFIRM NOR DENY stance towards nuclear weapons in south Korea after 1991 . Evidence revealed to the south Korean ' national assembly ' has shown that they are still there . It is deplorable that STWC echoed US imperialist propaganda on this point.
Veteran fake Leftist and DPRK basher Tariq Ali was relatively restrained but managed to tell a silly and ludicrous story that Benazir Bhutto had given the DPRK nuclear weapons and had taken them to the DPRK on her presidential plane !!! (Blimey !) .

Those speakers who put the DPRK nuclear programme into its historical context did not mention the use of biological weapons during the Korean War . None of the speakers mentioned the Juche idea and the DPRK's spirit of anti-imperialist independence during their presentations but tended to portray the DPRK as a puppet or client of the USSR-Russia and China .

One speaker wrongly claimed that the DPRK decided to develop nuclear weapons after the fall of the USSR , ignoring the fact that the DPRK was never part of the USSR's 'nuclear umbrella' nor was it a Warsaw pact member . Generally a few of the speakers came across as being part of the " I love Russia and China " brigade and supported the idea of these countries forcing the DPRK to disarm . UK KFA reject the idea , regardless of where it comes from , that the DPRK should disarm ,

Jeannie DeAngelis #fundie americanthinker.com

As far as the Trayvon Martin situation goes, acquittal or no acquittal, the whole event and subsequent trial is a tragedy. And Skittles and iced tea or not, 17-year-old Trayvon should never have been lurking about in a hoodie between buildings on a dark rainy night in a townhouse complex. Now, regardless of how or why this boy died, a child is dead and will never have an opportunity to grow out of the typical youthful foolishness which ultimately cost him his life.
And for every hoodie-wearing thug out there who's now blaming George Zimmerman for Trayvon's death, know this: the behavior of those who give good, upstanding young black men a bad name are ultimately much more responsible for Trayvon's death than one legally-armed American citizen defending himself against an out-of-control teenage boy slamming his "crazy ass cracka" head against a concrete walk.

Instead of blaming racism for profiling a black kid strangely meandering around in the dark on a drizzly night, how about placing the blame at the feet of all the black youth, like Trayvon, whose behavior on other occasions causes suspicion to be focused in the general direction of the larger population of perfectly innocent black teenage youth?
For example, has Michelle Obama discussed who killed 15-year-old Chicago schoolgirl Hadiya Pendleton in a drive-by shooting? Of course not, because the killers were two black youths: 18-year-old Michael Ward and 20-year-old Kenneth Williams, neither of whom look anything like George Zimmerman.

FBI records show that in 2005 alone, African Americans accounted for 49% of all homicide victims in the U.S. The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics cited data showing that 93% of murdered blacks had the crime perpetrated on them by other blacks. That means if Trayvon had continued on in the direction in which he seemed to be headed, based on the rate that young black males die at the hands of other black males, Trayvon's chances for survival were, at best, a crap shoot.

Then, the day after George Zimmerman was acquitted of second-degree murder, the President of the United States chose to stir the race-baiting pot again by intimating that America should honor Trayvon by passing gun control:

"I now ask every American to respect the call for calm reflection from two parents who lost their young son. And as we do, we should ask ourselves if we're doing all we can to widen the circle of compassion and understanding in our own communities."

Barack Obama isn't one to hide his disrespect for federalism or conceal his contempt for the legal system or the U.S. Constitution. The statement Obama made reveals that his motivation was to once again gain personal political expediency from someone else's heartbreak.

Think about it: the president sheds tears over murdered children, but it's always attached to advancing a specific political agenda. That's precisely why, in some circles, as America's most radical pro-abortion advocate, Barack Obama has zero credibility when discussing lives lost to gun violence.

As far as Obama is concerned, Trayvon Martin deserves kudos for delivering a big bang for his anti-Second Amendment buck. Nonetheless, if the Trayvon controversy should miraculously cool down, in due time someone else will come along and provide still more political capital for the president.

Rest assured, if need be, Mr. Obama will move on quickly from Trayvon, just as he moved from Tucson to Sandy Hook to any number of other tragedies he's used as political causes.

Unfortunately, based on what went on in Sanford, Florida, certain African Americans fall into the same category as the president they blindly support.

Black Americans hung up on fomenting racial unrest or buying into the victim mentality lack credibility too, because although they cry racism over the tragic loss of Trayvon Martin, who they call one of their 'babies,' they have shed few tears over the extermination of actual babies taking place for the last 40 years in abortion clinics all over America.

While focused on Trayvon Martin, socially liberal black Americans continue to ignore the genocide that kills thousands of black baby boys (and girls) every day, many of whom, if given the chance to live, much like Trayvon Martin might have grown up to look like the son Barack Obama never had.

Does it matter that blacks constitute only 13% of the population but account for 36% of all the abortions that take place every year? Where are the tears, protest signs, and New Black Panther demonstrations for the deaths of innocent children who didn't break anyone's nose or smash anyone's skull against a sidewalk?

For perspective, 13% of the U.S. population contributed 22,000,000 of the 60,000,000 children aborted since 1973. Each and every day in the U.S., approximately 1,876 black children are aborted. And yet pro-life people are supposed to believe that the angst over Trayvon's untimely end is based on the black community's respect for the sanctity of life?

In her fight to save the unborn, Erma Clardy Craven, the late Minnesota social worker and author of Abortion, Poverty and Black Genocide, once shared that, "17,000 aborted babies were found in a dumpster outside a pathology laboratory in Los, Angeles, California; some 12-15,000 were observed to be black." Does the president care about them? Apparently not.

While Obama is asking America to "honor Trayvon" by doing what Obama wants, we forget that none of the 15,000 black babies found rotting in that dumpster in LA got the chance to wear a hoodie, shop for Skittles and fruit-flavored iced tea, or skulk around in the dark in a Sanford, Florida residential complex.

Suffice it to say, if only liberal blacks would spend just one day shouting as loudly about the systematic slaughter being perpetrated upon millions of their babies, the angry "Justice 4 Trayvon" stance would likely be better understood by those who disagree with their choice of poster child for racial injustice.


Jeannie DeAngelis #racist americanthinker.com


Honor Trayvon by Ending the Black Genocide

As far as the Trayvon Martin situation goes, acquittal or no acquittal, the whole event and subsequent trial is a tragedy. And Skittles and iced tea or not, 17-year-old Trayvon should never have been lurking about in a hoodie between buildings on a dark rainy night in a townhouse complex. Now, regardless of how or why this boy died, a child is dead and will never have an opportunity to grow out of the typical youthful foolishness which ultimately cost him his life.

And for every hoodie-wearing thug out there who's now blaming George Zimmerman for Trayvon's death, know this: the behavior of those who give good, upstanding young black men a bad name are ultimately much more responsible for Trayvon's death than one legally-armed American citizen defending himself against an out-of-control teenage boy slamming his "crazy ass cracka" head against a concrete walk.

Instead of blaming racism for profiling a black kid strangely meandering around in the dark on a drizzly night, how about placing the blame at the feet of all the black youth, like Trayvon, whose behavior on other occasions causes suspicion to be focused in the general direction of the larger population of perfectly innocent black teenage youth?


....

Black Americans hung up on fomenting racial unrest or buying into the victim mentality lack credibility too, because although they cry racism over the tragic loss of Trayvon Martin, who they call one of their 'babies,' they have shed few tears over the extermination of actual babies taking place for the last 40 years in abortion clinics all over America.

While focused on Trayvon Martin, socially liberal black Americans continue to ignore the genocide that kills thousands of black baby boys (and girls) every day, many of whom, if given the chance to live, much like Trayvon Martin might have grown up to look like the son Barack Obama never had.

Does it matter that blacks constitute only 13% of the population but account for 36% of all the abortions that take place every year? Where are the tears, protest signs, and New Black Panther demonstrations for the deaths of innocent children who didn't break anyone's nose or smash anyone's skull against a sidewalk?

For perspective, 13% of the U.S. population contributed 22,000,000 of the 60,000,000 children aborted since 1973. Each and every day in the U.S., approximately 1,876 black children are aborted. And yet pro-life people are supposed to believe that the angst over Trayvon's untimely end is based on the black community's respect for the sanctity of life

Ladiesman #fundie forums.spacebattles.com

As a hypothetical since this has piqued my curiosity. What if a close friend or family member revealed they were a child killer (or child molestor even)? Snitchable?

Family member? No. Although it would bring with it some serious issues.

Friend? I dunno. It depends. Depends on the friend, first off. Then it depends on what they did. My friend comes to me and says he touched a little kid or something? No, i'm not turning him in, but i'll smack him in the head. Raped a kid? Still no, but it's probably going to end the friendship. Killed a kid? I...don't know. It sort of depends on the situation and how it comes out. If comes out completely nonchalant and remorseful...I might, only for fear of him doing it again. If he sounded genuinely disturbed and remorseful about what he did, then no. He already has to live with it. I'm not gonna be his friend anymore either, but i'm not gonna turn him in.

It basically comes down to that according to me, myself, my family, and my friends are more important than random other people. This isn't saying everyone I know has free reign to whatever they want in my mind, but it is saying that i'm going to put their best interests before anyone elses, including society as a whole.

Let's say some crazy disaster occurred. My family and close friends are safe, along with me. We're pretty hungry. I go out and find a buttload of food. Along the way, I find a large group of people who are starving. Am I going to give them the food I found? No. It's going to my family and friends. Now, I DO actually believe in helping people so after my friends and families needs have been met, if I have an overabundance, I would try to help out those people, but I have to look out for what's important to me first.

It's really the same thing. I don't know random dude at train station. I DO know my friend, very well. I'm sad that random dude died, and i'm disgusted with my friend, but i'm not going to contribute to something that is going to put him behind bars or be executed. I won't cause suffering to my friend.

Ladiesman, I´m sorry, but that´s incredbly fucked up.

My friends and family are literally the most important thing in the world to me. There is nothing, NOTHING more important than them. I would protect them to the death. I won't let them go to the jail if I have any power over it. I will not let them be executed. They are number 1. That's where my loyalty lies. Without my friends and family, I have nothing.

Honestly, it would probably go further than "not telling the police", especially if it were family. I'd probably help dispose of the body. Family and friends come first, period. End of discussion. I don't care what they did.

James Laffrey #racist whiteswillwinparty.org

Preface: Don’t say publicly what I’m saying. Somebody has to say what I’m saying, so I am saying it, as my duty. But you need never say it. Just do it. Be a silent hero — until Victory Day. Furthermore, be smart. Use your White intelligence. Advice is here, but surely you will think of other methods, perhaps easier or safer.

As JB Campbell has said, and as I say: “Save America. Kill the jews.”

Blunt? Yes. Manly? Yes. Correct? Absolutely.

We must kill the enemy population that has invaded our country. The enemy is jewry. Get started. Kill one jew. We greatly outnumber them, so the personal quota for each of us can be a mere one. Of course, the more the better, thus the quicker the problem is solved.

Do you have a gun? Consider using it. You could use the M.O. of the Africans among us who shoot people and get away with it every day. Most guns are noisy and leave evidence. If you account for those factors, you can enjoy the use of one of the most effective weapons our White ancestors ever invented.

In regard to noise, consider a different type of gun. Pellet gun, for example. Very low noise. Effective at close range. Cheap.

There are other kinds of “guns.”

If you are near a very large body of water, then a type of speargun may be a weapon of choice. You see the jew on his boat in the marina. You help him get the point that this is our country, permanently.

Nearly anywhere, a bow and arrow may get the job done in almost complete silence. Jews are poolside, or in a convertible waiting at a red light, and you put this new idea in his or her head. Or you know the university professor is at his desk, so you carry your lightweight bag into the nearest restroom and string up, or do so outside his door, then silently take aim and pierce that enemy’s arrogant exterior for all time.

Note: Wear gloves to avoid leaving fingerprints on anything at the scene. As always, be careful about where you bought the weapon, pay in cash or another way not connected to you, and consider disposing of whatever weapon after one use so that you are not in possession of any evidence directly linkable to the deed. Thus, you remain free.

Whether man or woman, working within personal contact range of your target(s) opens up a variety of effective weapons to choose from. I prefer to avoid the weapons for cutting, thus avoiding troublesome blood transfer.

For example, a man or a woman can use a “necklace” — any kind of wire, rope, strap. Nobody will suspect you when carrying a child’s jump-rope. And next time, switch to a guitar cable, or a speaker wire. Next, use a long narrow strap off a purse, or a belt. Variety will help keep you free. Suggestion: Apply the weapon above the adam’s apple.

A technique: Have an appropriately large loop half tied already. Then, approach, apply, and yank ends to tighten. Likely finish the knot. If the jew is standing, consider turning, then bending over enough so the jews’ feet lift off the ground. Carry it like Santa carries his sack to the very nearby concealment area you already chose. (How long will the jew grunt and flail? Try holding your breath while imagining you are under great duress. How long can you do it? That’s how long. Not long at all. But at this point, the enemy is unconscious not dead. So, don’t remove the necklace. If you want to remove the necklace, wait another minute.)

There are other weapons that people don’t think of as weapons. How about a can of very toxic spray? You are on a bicycle, for example, and you stop by a jew to ask for directions. And you absolutely soak his or her nose, mouth, and eyes with the paint, varnish, bug poison, or whatever. You want this jew to be seated in a car or other situation preventing quick escape before you apply enough poison up the nose and/or in the mouth to be fatal. A fatal result is important. Why? No witness, no “victim” to potentially identify our White Weekend Warrior.

Or maybe you are good with toxic pharmaceuticals. Jew doctors poison our people every day with them. (That’s how the jews got rid of Michael Jackson, though we don’t concern ourselves with the demise of Africans. That’s likely how the jews finished off Gen. George Patton. Also, countless hospital-bound Whites have been medically murdered.) Administer liberally. Spray or inject. Consider, if necessary, how you will prevent the target from shouting for help.

Or maybe you have secret possession of a tazer. Follow a jew into a restroom. If nobody else is in there, zap the jew into full heart arrest. Again, be careful about security cams, or be disguised. Put the jew in a stall so you will have minutes if not hours to calmy exit the scene and the area. (I prefer exiting the state.)

Other non-”weapons”

“Accident” a jew. Push one off a train in a place of certain death. Push one off a tall bridge. Push one off a runner’s path into icy waters. Tourist overlooks. Cruise ships. Ferries.

Likely operate in the evening or at night — usually not in view of witnesses or a security cam. Or, if you like, go well disguised so distant witnesses or cameras won’t matter.

The time of operation will depend on the kind of target you select and the location of that target. For example, if the location is in a university bathroom/toilet, the time of day may not be important, though outside darkness always aids a clean exit from the location.

In addition to locations mentioned above, consider parks. Near banks, universities, hospitals. For example, it’s easy to go to a university you don’t know and act like you belong there. Nobody knows you don’t belong there. Many universities have park-like areas on their grounds. Vanderbilt University in Nashville is just one of thousands of campuses where the international population provides cover for anyone dressed like a student, teacher, professor, or administrator.

As I said in the “Need A Job?” article (also linked above as “advice”), your good guerrilla deeds for our race and country may pay for themselves if you choose a situation in which you can disable the target and then liberate our money from them. Where would this likely be successful? Where will you find targets likely carrying a significant amount of cash? (Only cash is safe. Leave a little cash on the jew so as to muddle any claim of robbery.)

Jews have more money than we do, despite the pretences of many of them. Medical professions, university professionals, jew students, jewesses entering or exiting a beauty salon. Politicians. Judges. Lawyers. Near their offices and workplaces you may find those professionals and their high-level staff.

Of course, prime locations for finding obvious jews — though in sight of their security cameras — are their synagogues, Bnai Brith offices, youth organization facilities, luxury resorts, and exclusive restaurants. By the way, if your town has a university, it has a synagogue and a Bnai Brith office, though you probably don’t know their locations. Find them. Whether or not you choose to work near one, it is good to know where they are.

Normally, choose a target no one would connect to you. I crave to remove from our country the jews I have personally known before I became jew-wise. But to be safe, I must leave them for another admirable White Weekend Warrior.

Again, don’t leave any personal evidence. Tell no one.

Gloves of near skin-tone color will go unnoticed after dark, thus not arousing suspicion by the target or passersby.

Partner? Choose only someone who you can absolutely trust. Otherwise, work alone. Having a partner is very helpful in regard to having a lookout, having a helper to silence or restrain the target if necessary, or having transportation at the ready.

During the work, don’t carry cell phones and such devices that provide electronic evidence to the enemy jews and their accomplices in their corporations and the government.

Consider a simple “disguise” for a vehicle, if using a vehicle. For example, give potential witnesses something to focus on, such as a sign or symbol or bright cloth, and then permanently and safely discard that item immediately afterward. Also, consider disguising the license plate with well-placed mud, or tape that confuses the letters of numbers, or alternate plates for “work” use only.

The only solution for enemy invaders of our country is death. Henry Ford a hundred years ago published enough proof to warrant their execution. But our previous truthtellers left the main job undone. We have to kill the jews. It is impossible to win a war if you leave all of the enemy standing. Jews are the invaders — no matter how many generations ago their ancestors first invaded. Every single reduction in that enemy population is helpful.

Every day, deaths occur for which the “law enforcement” agencies never find who caused them. Many of those deaths are caused by low-IQ Africans and Mestizos among us, but their crimes go underreported by the jewspapers. There is no reason to fear that the jews and their accomplices in “law enforcement” will solve our stealthy, high-IQ deeds of heroism. Again, tell no one. And don’t be tricked into telling.

All jews will die eventually, as will we. We must merely hasten their deaths. Before I die, no matter when that day comes, I’ll know that I’ve done my share, and I will die with honor. If enough of my fellow Whites join in delivering justice upon the jews, we will win soon.

By the way, make no mistake about it, we don’t intend to be martyrs. No, no, no. We intend success in every deed and to enjoy our final victory.

Save our race. Save America. Kill the jews.

Whites Will Win!

NPChalmbers #racist archive.is

Kike thinks kike propaganda is a valid source for kike IQs.

Nope, try again, kikeberg.

Secondly, whites built civilization, not kikes or asians, so you can shut the fuck up and acknowledge whites are superior to you and all your shitty inbred kike buddies, or you can just stop using the Internet, running water, medicine, anything with integrated circuits, the wheel etc. or basically any other invention on the planet, since whites created those too.

Go live in a cave and you'll be reconnecting with what society would look like if it were ruled by inbred jews.

So come get us when jews actually manage to create a single thing of their own rather than just leeching off their superiors.

yummyfish #fundie reddit.com

I... actually agree with this. I personally do not stigmatize pedophilic feelings granted that these feelings are kept to oneself and never acted upon. It's not far fetched to conceive of a situation in which someone who sees children sexually would work a job in which they interacted with them regularly and yet was otherwise a perfectly normal person and upstanding worker. I see it no differently from a nurse taking care of a patient they find attractive. So long as no one is diddling kids then let people work where they want to work, are we the god damn thought police now?

If you know that you are a pedophile, the responsible thing to do is not to deliberately put yourself into a position where you are required to be in close contact with children. That's just common sense.
I'm sure there are people who do it, who have these feelings and work with kids. And I am sure that there are plenty of them that never act on their feelings. Fine. I don't like it, but neither can I really prevent it.
But if you go on to the internet and announce that you are a pedophile AND that you believe you should be working with children, people are going to think you are an irresponsible creep. That's not thought policing. That's reality.
If my alcoholic cousin came to me and said they thought it would be a grand idea to start working as a bartender, I'd suggest they reconsider. That's not thought policing. It's saying, "Hey, you have a temptation that most people don't and that could cause some real damage to the people around you if you give in to, so maybe you should try a job where you aren't constantly surrounded by the one thing that you want but cannot have."
Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you should.


As I've said before, I'm arguing from the position that the pedophile in question is otherwise a perfect teacher who has had their heart set on being one forever. Of course, if you knew them and you knew their temptation you'd talk to them about it, but if they were dead set on it would you truly tell them to just give up on their dream? Also, your analogy isn't too good, drinking alcohol is not illegal, and an alcoholic has already indulged in their temptation enough for it to be a legitimate problem, the pedophile in question has never acted on their lust and in all likelihood never will.


the (adult) patient can tell the nurse to fuck off / press charges / get a restrainin gorder / clock him/her in the face, your choice. children are defenceless.

But they are both exposed to similar temptation, and in the case of both being professionals who are serious about their job, neither would give in.

it doesn't matter: the other party is too vulnerable, the risk is unjustifiable.
it's like saying "I am a very careful smoker, I will make sure my sigarette doesn't drop and make your gas station blow up." You are not allowed to light up, period.
just NO.

Your analogy fails, a smoker already smokes and does so regularly, the pedophile I am discussing has never acted on their lust and likely will never act upon it. It's a thought, not an action.
So you believe we should be policing thoughts? Telling people what they can and cannot do based upon their feelings? Should other professions start doing this too? Should a Nurse in a Convalescent Home be fired for thinking about how much they hate their job?

the disbalance of power (lack of ability to protect him/herself) for a child is so great, you are practically placing him/her totally at mercy of the person who may or may not act upon their feelings. Nope, nope, nope.

ays me, this is the point I am arguing from, if you don't like it then you can stop responding. I described the pedophile in question from the very beginning as someone who has never acted upon their feelings and in all likelihood never would.
You didn't answer my question. Do we start thought-policing people?

When it comes to the vulnerability of a child over an adult's desire to have a specific job, yes.

If you really believe that anyone has the right to control the mind of others for any reason then we've nothing to talk about.

Believe me, I don't condone pedophilia and I'm not trying to protect molesters who would take advantage of children. I just see a group of people who may have legitimate psychological problems they may need help to get over being stigmatized so heavily that they can't find that help and it makes me sympathize with their situation.

Fotheringay-Phipps #fundie boards.straightdope.com

The question here is simple. What would you have done if you were in the same position as Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar, where several of your daughters told you that their 15-year old brother had been openly touching them on the breasts and genital areas both when sleeping and awake?

I find it a bit odd that all these condemnations of the Duggars seem to completely ignore the fact that - as far as anyone can tell - the approach they took actually worked.

[FTR and FWIW, I'm pretty sure I would not report my kid to the police in a situation like this. I agree about watching him like a hawk, though.]

I'm not even sure I would take the victim kids for therapy. Besides for the fact that therapy in general is not necessarily effective, there's also a serious risk IMO that by doing so you would magnify the significance of the incidents in their minds and by this itself cause them all sorts of trauma that might be avoided if you used a lighter approach.

I would definitely speak to the kids about it and let them know if they were troubled by what had happened we could get help from professionals, but if they seemed fine with parental reassurance that they had nothing to feel bad about then I would probably leave them be.


You think this is a minor thing? A five year old gets molested and you think it's nothing?

No need to exaggerate here. I didn't say it was "nothing" and I can't think of a legitimate reason for you to pretend that I did.

What I do think is that a big portion of the trauma that abuse victims feel is the result of connotations created by society and culture, and to the extent that the matter is highlighted as a Terrible Thing it would tend to magnify that aspect. IMO. Feel free to disagree without pretending that I've said five year olds getting abused is "nothing".

Anna T. #fundie ccostello.blogspot.com

(in response to a question about a misogynistic male who the asker interacts with)

First, allow me to say I definitely share your concern. The situation you describe is disturbing, and I believe one question should be asked here in the first place: how wise is it really for a young lady to have a male friend? Please know I don't presume to say this is a black-and-white issue, or that I know the one and only definite answer. I'm just questioning something our culture marked as unquestionably obvious.

Neither am I saying that a young lady should never be friendly with a young man. When I see a male co-worker, I'll definitely stop by for a friendly conversation. But my own experience made me very cautious about being bosom friends with a young man. I know many would disagree with me, but I believe many such friendships are based on concealed attraction from at least one side, which can lead to an unhealthy situation.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

REMEMBER, REMEMBER, THE 22ND OF NOVEMBER.
THE THERMONUCLER TREASON AND PLOT.
I KNOW OF NO REASON WHY THERMONUCLEAR TREASON SHOULD EVER BE FORGOT.
LYNDON JOHNSON, LYNDON JOHNSON, T'WAS HIS INTENT.
TO TURN WASHINGTON CITY INTO RADIOACTIVE RUBBLE AND CEMENT!!

Nothing gets a Jesuit more excited than an explosion. That is why they teach that the universe was created by the 'big bang." For over a century, the Militia of Jesus has been intimately involved in the splitting of the atom and atomic research. Not for peaceful purposes . . . but to produce the biggest explosion.

Jesuit Guy Fawkes is the "'patron saint" of all the makers of weapons of mass destruction.

On November 5, 1605, Fawkes planned to decapitate the entire British government by planting 36 barrels of gunpowder in the Parliament cellar.

Following the coup d'etat in Dallas, Texas, Johnson was planning to decapitate the entire U.S. Government and reestablish the Confederacy with its capital at Richmond, Virginia!!

The Gunpowder Plot was to be the prelude to a British Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre.

Prior to the atomic age, would-be dictators always mobilized the army to eliminate all the members of the former regime. Johnson was still determined to eliminate his opponents, but the job was made much easier by the nuclear weapons at his disposal.

Naturally, Lyin' Lyndon would blame it all on the Russians.

[...]

Lyndon Johnson warned his supporters to evacuate or head for the fallout shelters!!

Lyndon "Guy Fawkes" Johnson planned on "decapitating" the entire U.S. government with a "big bang" version of the 1605 Gunpowder Plot. Instead of gunpowder, he planned on using a small thermonuclear missile fired from Cuba. Naturally, he would blame it all on the Russians.

Getting rid of President Kennedy was only the first stage in his military coup d'etat. Getting rid of his supporters was the next step. J. Edgar Hoover and his FBI (Federal Bureau of Inquisition), kept a list of all those in Washington who supported or opposed the death of the Republic.

Johnson warned all his supporters in the Kennedy Administration to avoid the city on that momentous day.

November 22 was to be Guy Fawkes Day in the U.S.

Johnson warned his supporters in the Kennedy Administration to avoid the city on that day.

One of the most notable was Dean Rusk, the President's own Secretary of State, and Press Secretary Pierre Salinger, who always stuck like glue to the President on all his previous trips.

Kennedy's Cabinet were on their way to Asia when they heard the "sad news" that their boss was dead. Their plane turned around and headed back home, reaching Washington on the evening of November 22. To their great disappointment, the city was still standing.

Confederate Johnson would have shed few tears at the destruction of the city as he planned on making Richmond, Virginia, the rebel capital once again.

Defense Secretary Robert McNamara was also in Washington City at that time.

Kennedy's Cabinet were on their way to Asia when they heard the "sad news" that their boss was dead.

Their plane turned around and headed back home, reaching Washington on the evening of Nov. 22.

To their great disappointment, the city was still standing.

The Cabinet members who providentially avoided Washington City were: Secretary of State Dean Rusk, Treasury Secretary C. Douglas Dillon, Agriculture Secretary Orville Freeman, Interior Secretary Stewart Udall, Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Walter Heller, Treasury Undersecretary Henry Fowler, and other officials and spouses.

President Kennedy's children were also in Washington City at that time but Jackie never cared much for President Kennedy . . . or his children.

With Washington City destroyed, it would have been the perfect opportunity for Confederate Johnson to revive the Confederacy once again, with its capital at Richmond.

[...]

The Vietnam War was used to distract the people from the Thermonuclear Plot!!

Most people associate Lyndon Johnson with the disastrous Vietnam War. That war killed millions of Vietnamese Buddhists and almost bankrupted the United States. President Eisenhower extricated the U.S. from an Asian War and warned that another such war would be ruinous to the country. Lyin' Lyndon hated everything that President Eisenhower stood for.

The U.S. Guy Fawkes loved to blow things up and he certainly got his chance in Vietnam.

That war cost the lives of over 3,000,000 Vietnamese Buddhists and over 58,000 U.S. soldiers.

The war was just an excuse to distract the people from the events of November 22, 1963. It also made the military-industrial complex in Texas very, very rich.

Strategically, there was no rhyme or reason to the Vietnam War. The British didn't even send a medical unit to the conflict. His Texas friends supplying the military hardware became very, very rich, but Johnson said that the government did not have enough money to develop the Boeing 747 passenger aircraft.

The U.S. Guy Fawkes also assassinated the President's brother!!

From the very beginning, a bitter hatred and rivalry developed between the U.S. Guy Fawkes and Robert Kennedy. Robert Kennedy was attorney general at the time of the assassination, with the power to arrest all the assassins.

Due to massive anti-Vietnam War protests, Johnson announced that he would not run for reelection in 1968. Immediately afterward, Robert Kennedy announced his candidacy for the Presidency. As President, Robert Kennedy could have brought Johnson and the other assassins to justice.

Even in death, the feud between Johnson and Robert Kennedy continued.

Robert Kennedy was supposed to have a state funeral, with burial beside his brother in Arlington National Cemetery.

Lydnon Johnson made sure that Kennedy was buried at night in a more remote part of the cemetery.

Johnson was totally opposed to the idea that his arch-rival would be buried next to his own brother:

Johnson was equally concerned—or offended—by Bobby Kennedy's burial site. On the morning of June 6, within hours of Bobby Kennedy's death, within hours of declaring Kennedy "a noble and compassionate leader, a good and faithful servant of the people," the president phoned Clark Clifford and demanded to know whether Bobby had the right to be buried at Arlington. "I was stunned" Clifford recalled, "I was dumbfounded." The president's call marked "one of the saddest experiences in my long friendship" with Lyndon Johnson. (Shesol, Mutual Contempt, p. 457).

After a mass in St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York City, Robert Kennedy's remains were put on a train bound for Washington City. The train was scheduled to arrive at 4:40 p.m., but "sticking brakes" on the casket-bearing car caused it to be delayed by 4 hours. It did not arrive in the city until 9:10 p.m.

As President, Robert Kennedy could have brought Johnson and the other assassins to justice. It never happened because Robert Kennedy was silenced until Judgment Day.

Sarah Terzo #fundie liveactionnews.org

Woman regrets abortion after seeing her 12-week-old baby: ‘They deceived me’

Previously, I’ve written about the way abortion facility workers sometimes lie to women about the development of their babies and about abortion’s risks. In the following story, a woman discovered the abortion workers lied about her baby in the worst way possible.

The now off-line website Abortion Concern had the story of a young woman named Lynda who had an abortion. She had been pressured by her boyfriend, whom she described as being “ecstatic” when the abortion was over.

Doubts and feelings of grief began to surface on the drive home. She became even more upset when her boyfriend, who had promised to stay with her after the abortion, left her alone.

As we drove away, I felt like I had forgotten something, or left something behind. We returned home, and [my boyfriend’s] promise to me to be there with me, was totally false. He left me there alone. At first, I was relieved that it was over, and then I was hit by the most overwhelming, tremendous grief I had ever experienced.

But the worst was yet to come. Lynda says:

I was also experiencing very bad cramps. Four days after the abortion, I got up to [go to the bathroom] and felt that something was not right inside. When I wiped, I glanced down at the wad of toilet paper in my hand, and saw my 12-week old fetus. Its head was smashed, and it’s eyes were on either side of its head. Its body was attached to the head, and only the right arm and hand remained. I was shocked and horrified by what I saw.

The abortion clinic had botched the abortion and only gotten part of the baby out. At 12 weeks, Lynda’s child had been fully formed. He or she had a beating heart and brain waves. Already capable of responding to touch, he would have pulled away from the abortion instruments. At the time of his death, the baby was already right or left handed. He had lungs and would have “breathed” amniotic fluid, strengthening his lungs to breathe air after he was born. Not only did he have hands and fingers, but also fingerprints. These fingerprints marked him as a unique individual who had never existed before in all of history and will never exist again.

Lynda’s boyfriend also saw the baby:

My boyfriend saw it too. He was standing in the bathroom shaving. He heard me say “oh my gosh,” when he turned to see what I was holding. He ran out of the bathroom, and kept repeating, “I didn’t see it, I didn’t see that, I didn’t see the dead baby.”

I just sat there, with tears streaming down my cheeks, as I held my baby’s hand on my pinky, trying to find words to say, of why I failed this innocent child. I had tuned my boyfriend out, to where he was just some noise in the background.

Lynda called the abortion clinic and told them what happened. But…

They criticized me, because, “a baby does not form until the last trimester.” They deceived me when they initially told me that. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out what a miniature hand, with four fingers and a thumb looked like, or to know what it was I held in my hand that day.

Lynda sank into what she called a “deep depression.” She sought post-abortion counseling through a local church but says it only made her feel more guilty. Unsurprisingly, her relationship with her boyfriend fell apart:

At night, I’d lay awake in bed, sobbing quietly, so not to wake my boyfriend, who had turned from demanding, to insensitive and unsupportive, and couldn’t deal with me, given I simply just couldn’t “get over it.” My relationship with him ended.

Lynda finished her testimony by saying, “I believe the abortion doctors deceive a person.” She claimed that she would not have had an abortion if she had been told the truth.

While seeing one’s mutilated baby after a surgical abortion is very rare, sadly, being lied to by the abortion facility is not. Read more testimonies from women who were misled and regretted having their abortions.

Wasabi #fundie fanfiction.net

Could Have.
It sure is dark.
I sit groggily upright, supporting my upper body with one outstretched arm, the palm of my hand pressed against what feels like smooth, cold concrete. My other hand
rubs an eye as I squint to adjust my sight. My efforts, however, are in vain: this darkness is eerily impenetrable. There mustn't be a single light source here......which does
nothing to help explain just where the hell I am.
"Hello? I call into the ebony void.
I listen to the acoustics of my voice. It sounds contained, as if I'm in a room, and at the same time......it seems to go on forever, like I'm in a canyon. Bizarre.
Another sound catches my attention. A familiar, electronic hum from behind me. I turn, startled, and face an ominously glowing monitor, its light illuminating little more than the desk it rests upon. I fumble blindly for the chair latent before it, and seat myself, squinting as I began to discern what was onscreen.
Well, I'll be damned! It's that old fiction website I used to visit as an adolescent! I take a hold of the mouse and muse fondly over my own writings for a short period of
time. Now that's what I call a witty repartee! I feel profoundly nostalgic reading this.....it's comforting to know that my hard-lined stance against Christianity is just as
prominent today as it was when I was a teenager, campaigning against whatever ridiculous notion they were trying to prove on this website.
And yet, I can't shake this weird sense of unease as I read. Thoughts begin to pass through my head. Thoughts along the lines of why the hell are pages exclusively surrounding what I wrote some twenty odd years ago being displayed to me on a remote computer terminal in a pitch black room? Is this some sort of government experiment?
I sit back after reading a flame I had once written and am startled to realise that I'm perspiring - though the room is a moderate, comfortable temperature. I twiddle my fingers against my thighs absent-mindedly, incapable of shaking this rising feeling of unexplained dread. What is going on here?!
More importantly, where did this open Bible come from? I cast a dubious glance at the pages, frowning to note they're empty bar two verses.
......for the wages of sin is death......
and
......nobody comes to the Father, except through me......
Huh. Profoundly pointless. That's Christianity in a nutshell. I close the book and fold my arms across my chest, leaning back in the chair and narrowing my eyes at the monitor pensively. All of a sudden, I'm scared witless to note that the screen's glow illuminates the face of a man standing behind it.
"Who are you?" I cry, staggering backwards, not pretending to mask my fear with a facade of contempt anymore.
The man stands there in contemplative silence. Though the blue light of the screen casts unsettling shadows across his face, I can still see the look of inquisitiveness in his deep, dark eyes. Not breaking the gaze, he slowly circles the desk, and rests against it.
"You know who I am," he says simply, his rich voice attempting to be monotone and unfeeling, but unable to hide his unhappiness.
Chillingly, this man is correct. I know exactly who he is. And from that, I can deduce where I am......
Oh no. Oh God, no.
The man nods, turning his eyes away and staring off into the void, sadly.
I try to say something as my frantic eyes dart between the Bible, the man and the screen. My mouth opens and closes several times in succession, before he meets my gaze again, and I am overwhelmed by a bitter, bitter hybrid of guilt and terror. I double over and vomit pungent bile onto the cold concrete, then fall to my knees and gasp for air as the thick, acrid juice dangles from my trembling lip.
But there's no time for this. Now that I'm aware of what's happened, I stumble to my feet and wipe my mouth, looking to the man pleadingly, accusingly.
"This is not fair!" I scream, not bothering to break the situation down piece-by-piece. "Not fair! Why wasn't I given forewarning? Why didn't you show yourself?'
The man doesn't even blink. He just looks at me with weary eyes, as if he'd heard that one on countless occasions. He gestures for me to look at the monitor once more, and I frenetically oblige, squinting through my tears to see what was there.
My legs buckled involuntarily as I scrolled down.
Dozens, maybe hundreds of posts by Christians, followers of this man beside me, demonstrating his love for me in plain freaking English! Demonstrating this simple dynamic that only now am I willing to accept!
A heaving sob wracks my chest. There is only one thing for me to do.
"Lord, I'm sorry!" I wail, falling at his feet and grasping his robes, "You are the Christ, and I'm sorry! I'm s-so sorry......"
I whimper and shriek like a child at his feet. Never before have I felt so afraid.
I feel beads of moisture fall through my hair. His tears are also flowing, however much restraint he is trying to exercise. But the truth of the matter remains. My fate is sealed. Sealed here in the darkness. I turn my tear streaked face towards him once more as his perfect face gazes down at me resignedly.
"I never knew you," he says simply.
Those words capitalize a thousand explanations in my reeling mind. He had, in effect, said, You rejected me, though I offered you life every day. A lifetime of supposed intellectual integrity means nothing compared to an alternative you once dismissed and held in unbelieving contempt.
I knew I had no-one to blame but myself. And I weep. Not choked sobs, but long, howling wails of despair as I felt his robes slip from between my fingers. I suspend my twisted face above the pool of sick and yell into it, distraught and destroyed.
"What kind of God would allow this to happen to His own creation?"! bellow as he grows further and further away, the salty tears flowing into my mouth. "The kind that gives His creation the freedom of choice they both deserve and desire," he says distantly as he walks away.
I stand upright and go to follow him, but am powerless to do so. My eyes wander miserably to the Bible, opened again and exhibiting verses I'd read before, but literally chose not to understand. Verses explaining just how fair and reasonable the premise of following Christ is. I gasp in horror as I watch the monitor begin to dim.
"No!" I cry, hitting it. "No, don't die! No, please?'
Again, my efforts are in vain. The last thing I ever see is the written expression of my denial of everything that man stands for. I feel it disintegrate in my hands, and am left with nothing. Just the darkness.
I wander for a while, finally coming to wall composed of the same cold concrete the floor is made up of. I sit against it with my knees hugged to my chest, recounting the happy moments of my life, the moments of joy, of love. As if these delusions will tide me over until......until what? Until nothing! This is it. No end. Eternity. Forever.
I perk my ears and strain to hear through the darkness. It sounds like more weeping. Yes, I can the cries of others! The sounds escalate dramatically, and I hold my ears to drown it out, the resounding roar of hundreds of millions of damned souls, each of them writhing in their own everlasting regret, stuck with a worldly frame of mind in this accursed place. They all sound so close, and yet never have I felt so alone.
I rock back and forth, crying into my forearm despondently.
"I didn't ask for this......" I whisper.
No, a sinister voice tells me, You demanded it.
Guess what, peeps? I'm getting out of FF.Net. It angries up the blood, y'see, and presents a danger to what I believe by forcing me to retaliate out of fury instead of actual spiritual conviction. And that's just not on!
"So what are you trying to prove with this?" you may or may not ask. Well, a lot of people have been scoffing at the idea of 'coming to Christ out of fear of death/ as if the notion could possibly substitute for an actual relationship with the Lord.
Well, let me tell you this. Receiving Christ from a fear of hell is a heck of a lot better than not receiving him at all! At least, through that fear, you're accepting the truth of the matter, and from that acceptance, you're at every liberty to develop your relationship with Him, so that the fear is forgotten entirely, replaced by unprecedented appreciation for His sacrifice, and the awe-inspiringly simple, logical choice He's offered us. That's how it worked for me!
So repent! Discover for yourself what true freedom feels like, and don't disassociate yourself from the concept of hell just by saying it doesn't exist. Invite Christ into your heart and overcome even the possibility of a devastating afterlife in His name. Thank you for your time.
~WASABI~
PS: Also, could people stop exercising the term 'fuckwit'so liberally, please? It's the very embodiment of Neanderthal argumentative intelligence summarised in one unnecessary expletive, and contrived by the resident troll. Thanks again, and God bless!

Ron Cantor #homophobia blogs.timesofisrael.com

Ron Cantor: Dear Rabbi, please read the very next verse:
23 “‘Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion.
and then in verse 29 he refers to all the prohibitions as "destestable" or "abominitions"... same word that you interpret as "deceitful"
So, based on your interpretation, it is fine to have sex wtih an aminal as long as you are not married.
But in mordern Hebrew the word is clearly not decitful but destestable or an abomnination. Here is a sentnece that the dictiionary gives.
התעללות בילדים היא מעשה תועבה ...
Child ause is a DESTABLE act ...
If God is God and I beleive He is; if He is the author of the Hebrew scriptures and created mankind, then it is clear from Torah that our first command it so replinish the earth. You cannot replenish the earth or procreate in same sex unions. There is not hint of encoueagement of same sex unions in ancient Israel. We do not see Moses saying, "It is fine to have sexual relations with members of your gender provided that you are monagamous." Not even a hint!
But we live in a broken world becuase of the sin of Adam and Eve. For people with same sex attracations, my heart goes out to them. But it is a fearful thing to change the word of God.

Benny Attar: There would be no need for a law against bestiality if people weren't doing it. I find it incomprehensible that people like you are more accepting of adultery, which is prohibited in the ten commandments, than of homosexuality.

Ron Cantor: Benny Attar "more accepting of adutlery"? Nope...just as bad. In fact, Jesus said if you look at a woman and lust, you are guilty of adultery. He was not acccepting and neither am I. By the way, it is the author excusing adultery, as casual homosexual relationships are adulterous. But here is what you can't deny--and I was addressing the torah-beleiving rabbi--if you beleive in the God of the bible then there is no way to find a place for homosexual relationships.

Citizenfitz #racist realjewnews.com

Great series of posts here!

Yep, it’s a bet I’d take that for Harvey Weinstein’s dark star to have fallen so far, so fast he po’d someone in the Tribe even bigger than him.

But it is gratifying to see a Jew get hoisted high on one of Jewry’s favorite petards: the organized smear campaign. Forget everything about proof, evidence and presumption of innocence. We’re talking *female victims* here!

When, years after the fact, women suddenly start pushing into the headlines sobbing about how they were abused by some big, powerful man then we can be confident that a plan is coming together. Women can look, dress, talk and act like sluts but as Weinstein has learned the hard way, don’t ever…EVER treat them so.

Weinstein does appear to be a perverted, bullying, manipulative Jew but his accuser’s lurid stories beg the question: “Why did it take you years to come forward with this?”

Some who are now claiming Weinstein raped them apparently went on to somewhat longer term relationships with him. Lucia Evans and Asia Argento being two. Somewhat to his credit Weinstein actually did deliver on his promise to find parts for them in his movies. Oh well….

Ashley “I’m a nasty woman!” Judd is another one. Judd was happily getting naked for movie cameras before ever meeting Weinstein - but was so traumatized by her experience with him that it took her another year or two to begin getting naked again.

What makes the whole affair so wonderful is how for many years Jewry has been petting and abetting stupid, neurotic White wonen to feign the victim. Yet they turned this epic of weaponized neuroticism against one of their own.

So, who did Harvey piss off?

I think we’re seeing in miniature here the future of the Jews - in America at least. Finally, someone will come forward and say whats been obvious for decades: “It’s the Jews, stupid.” in a way that will resonate meaningfully with the dummies - and then the collapse of Jewry’s house of lies will commence in earnest.

It hasn’t happened yet but we’re in the early stages of it now.

Raycel27 #sexist #psycho rgif.is

[OP of "The Zoopill Or Why Animals Are Better Replacements"]

In my humble opinion many of us should turn our eyes to animals in order to relieve ourselves and in turn “cure” our Inceldom. It sounds degenerate and crazy but a lot of us don’t have the option to get any foids for this and why would you? Foids cause nothing but trouble. There’s benefits to fucking animals, for example:

1.Easy access to pussy, ass and mouth
2.Cheaper to feed depending on the animal
3.Can’t call the cops
4.Can be seen in public without suspicion
5.Can be trained
6.Better vaginas
7.Possible tax deductibility
8.Can be utterly degraded during sex
9.No pregnancy or STDs
10.Can hide in them in plain sight
11.True companionship
12.Less prison time of caught fucking one
13.Easy to obtain
14.Some states have no laws against it
15.You won’t be as sexually frustrated
16.No starfish sex and no faking it
17.Gaycels can use male animals
18.Can assert your dominance without question
19.Don’t make demands
20.Stray animals can also be used

Amos Moses #fundie christiannews.net

Amos Moses:
God has appointed Himself the judge of who in HIS creation is and is not ...... and HE has told the WORLD what that is ..... and it is WRITTEN DOWN ...... and it is SCRIPTURE ..... and you have no excuse ...........

Throatwobbler Mangrove:
And you have one interpretation of scripture, and everyone else has an interpretation that is slightly different. No one knows which one is exactly right. Once again, this comes down to you believing your opinion is superior to everyone else’s.

Amos Moses:
no, no, no ..... there is GODS interpretation ..... and we have NONE ..... anything outside of that is ERROR ....... and all you have is ERROR ................. as you do not even have scripture ........ you have given up your ability and right to judge who is and who is not ......

Throatwobbler Mangrove:
Do you not know what interpretation means?

Amos Moses:
do you know it does not matter what YOUR INTERPRETATION is ........ FYI ..... the only "interpretation" that has any weight is GODS ..... and when we allow the scriptures to speak FOR ITSELF ...... then that is Gods interpretation ..... that is exegesis ..... what you advocate is isegesis .... we do not bring our theology to the text and then try to justify it ..... we obtain it FROM THE TEXT ......... because the text is what we have ... NOT what we add ...... and we are FORBIDDEN from adding to the text ..............

Throatwobbler Mangrove:
Um...no, that's not what it means.
You know what the KJV is? It’s a translation, yes, but that also makes it an INTERPRETATION.
We have no choice when we read it, or read ANYTHING, but to interpret it. It just means use our brain to understand it.

Amos Moses:
right ... so when your kids decide they get to decide what you meant when you told them certain things ..... you are good with that .... because what YOU meant is garbage and what THEY "interpret" is right ............ do you even consider what you are saying and its application ..... FYI ..... God is not inclusive ..... He is EXCLUSIVE .....

Throatwobbler Mangrove:
"You just can't look at the moon too long."
You can read that sentence and interpret it two different ways. You can take it to mean that you should not look at the moon too long, or that you are being urged to look at the moon as long as you want to. Neither interpretation is wrong. What is the meaning meant? Only the person who posed the question knows.
And that's how it is with the Bible. Different Christians have different understandings on certain subject based on the words of the Bible. You may be correct that only one meaning is the correct one, but how can you possibly be arrogant enough to claim to know which one it is?

Amos Moses:
nope ..... wrong ... when you told your kids what you told them .... you did not mean what you said so that they could decide later what you meant ..... you meant what you said when you said it ..... and they do not get to decide later that you meant something different ...... unless you are an idiot ................

Throatwobbler Mangrove (this comment now deleted):
But this isn't about what you meant. The whole thing you are missing is HOW YOUR MESSAGE gets interpreted. It might get MISinterpreted along the way. You might be very clear on what you mean, and I'm sure you are. But language isn't always as precise as we want it to be and things get misunderstood. This isn't about changing the meaning. It's about getting the message clearly across. And you fail on that one every time.

Amos Moses:
nope .... The whole thing you are missing is .... I DO NOT CARE ....... my message is the SCRIPTURE ..... and the "interpretation" is what God said it is ..... and what He said is written down ..... and we do not get to add to it nor do we get to subtract from it ..... we do not get to use weasel words to get around it ..... we do not get to soften it so others can accept it ...... and it is not up to the SOPHISTRY of "our interpretation" .... and while you and i may have some difficulty in understanding it ..... GOD DOES NOT have any such difficulty ..... and our "interpretation" is not an excuse for saying it says something different than what He said ........
and when you tell your kids they have to home in the house by a certain time in the evening .... that does not mean "by interpretation" that at 5 minutes after that time ..... they are free to leave and go about their business in the middle of the night ........ again .... unless you are an idiot ........
scripture is not an invitation and it is not a plea and it is not open to what we want to believe it says ..... it is an ULTIMATUM .....

Throatwobbler Mangrove:
You exhaust the patience of even the most patient person, but I'll say this one more time. You do NOT understand what "interpret" means. It does mean to add, subtract or change. It does NOT. What it means is, and I'm using direct definitions from the dictionary now:
- to give or provide the meaning of; explain; explicate; elucidate:
- to interpret the hidden meaning of a parable.
- to construe or understand in a particular way:
- to interpret a reply as favorable.
- to bring out the meaning of (a dramatic work, music, etc.) by performance or execution.
- to perform or render (a song, role in a play, etc.) according to one's own understanding or sensitivity:
- to translate orally.
Notice NOTHING in all the many possible definitions involves changing anything. It is strictly about understanding, and nothing more.
As for God, you're saying God's perfect and nothing needs to be clarified. Maybe not from God's perspective, but it's US who are required to understand it correctly and sometimes words alone are not enough to do that and there can be some confusion or things getting lost in translation. That's nobody's fault, and it's not something anyone can do anything about, but nobody can say in situations like this that they are 100% right or wrong because it is not possible to know.

Amos Moses:
nope ... YOU do not understand what it means TO SCRIPTURE ..... and YOUR INTERPRETATION ....... means NOTHING ....

Throatwobbler Mangrove:
At this point it appears you are not even INTERESTED in having a coherent argument.
This has nothing to do with scripture. No one is arguing scripture.
This has to do with how we come to UNDERSTAND something and how it is spoken to us, and how it is possible to come to several different conclusions.
Once again, consider this example.
"You can't look at the sun too long."
That means two things. It means you should not look at the sun too long. It also means it's not possible to look at the sun long enough. They have opposite meanings, but the words do not change and can be INTERPRETED either way. So a person isn't wrong to believe it means that you shouldn't look at the sun too long, and the other person isn't wrong to believe there's no limit to how long you can look at the sun. There is confusion inherent in the original statement which has not been clarified.
That's EXACTLY how it is with SOME scripture.
And if you don't understand that, there's no hope for you to continue discussing it.

kkev #fundie rr-bb.com

a time of war, when Jesus returns {2and Coming} ............ Do you think he is going to turn the other Cheek.........I DON'T THINK SO! his vesture will be dipped in his enemies BLOOD! He is returning to rid the world of evil.....with a vengeance......How do you think he is going to do this? Preach!? Nope, he is going to "war" with them. And they will be dead and gone!

<p>War. A terrible last resort! but at times it must be Done.............The Bible says there is a time for WAR!

Ecclesiastes 3:8
A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.

CaptainObvious #fundie returnofkings.com

Become a fucking savage. Do you hate this modern world and the disgusting women it has shat out of its unholy womb?

Make yourself harder, meaner, stronger and more fucking ruthless than any white knight faggot could ever imagine.

Do women owe you anything? Does this shit hole of a modern progressive world owe us anything? Nope. Then we fucking OWE THEM NOTHING!

So give them your fucking middle finger and the spit out of your mouth. Mock them, bruise them, fucking shit all over them. Find like minded men estranged from this rancid cuntocracy and help light the fuse that burns this fucking shit to the goddamn ground.

More men are waking up. More are seeing that everything has been stolen from them and now we have absolutely NOTHING. Well do you know what that means? Now we are truly free and we have nothing to lose. We are on death ground and now it's time to wreak some fucking havoc. When you have nothing to lose you are the most dangerous fucking thing in this entire goddamn world.

Let the anger and the rage flow through you like fuel cascading down onto a righteous fire in your belly.

Train yourselves up in violent disciplines. Take no shit from anyone and be prepared to exact furious retribution on all transgressors. If you don't make them pay no one will. Fucking remember that shit goddamnit.

Most of all stop doing whatever you can think of that helps keep this unholy beast chugging along. Grab some gasoline and let's light a cigar as this motherfucker burns to the ground!

MarZutra #fundie jtf.org

I'd love to meet just one nice Jewish woman. It seems today, though very sad to say, most girls, let alone Jews have embraces all the lies of Liberalism, which is very depressing.... Most just don't get it. One would think people would look at the situation of every country on Earth especially Europe, Russia, Cuba ect. and say....something is mortally wrong with Liberalism...but nope...off to the bars with their booze, drugs, make-up leaving their underwear at home.... it is so tragic. Spengler was absolutely correct when he wrote his monumental work "The Decline of the West"..... I wish all Jews and righteous Gentiles the best of luck. "To find one good woman today is comparable to searching for a diamond in a toilet"-Dr. S. Sussman

various WGTOWs #sexist reddit.com

(violenceandperfume)
What's the worst thing about males?

I think it's good to have a reminder as to why we avoid males at all costs. Maybe sticky the post so we can get the point across. My answer: they're violent. This is inherent and even they admit. It's scary to think how often they think about hurting women.
What's the best action to take then? Avoid. Avoid at all costs. No relationships, because if you bring up the fact that they don't clean up around the house, they lose control and get angry. They throw things. Push you. Yell at you and say you're nagging them.
Friendship? BIG no no. Males only want one thing and if you deny them of sex they'll lost it and hurt you. How many times have you heard stories about women rejecting male friends, and they react with violence and anger?
So... What do you think is the worst quality in males?

(cbatta2025)
Their precious little egos and them thinking they are smarter than any woman. I work in a STEM profession, they are pathetic.

(fatfinger357)
We women don't need men. Men are completely useless. Men don't need women either. We don't need each other. Let's just stay away from each other. My life's Goal is to convince other women to stay away from men and given how toxic and evil men are it is not hard to convince women that they don't need men. What exactly do men offer? Nothing. I am completely happy by myself.

(duljjaegureum)
WHY do they smell so bad?! Do they not know basic hygiene? I recently learned men don't even wipe their asses after taking a shit. They just walk around with the shit smearing their underwear. They call this skidmarks. Men walk around in shitty clothes like toddlers.

(ProgressiveFragility)
they don't have ovaries

littlebratinsocal #fundie reddit.com

This just makes me confused, because I personally don't understand how you can be really good friends with someone who eats animals. It's like being friends with someone who kicks their dog, only it's not just hurting the dog, it's literally destroying the planet. Personally, I am on the hunt for non-religious plant-based friendships, because those are the only people I can respect and see in a positive light.

Of course I understand it's a process, and I take pride in planting seeds along my journey, but someone who outright refuses to educate themselves and denies what I say and acts like I'm ridiculous; those people are not people I could ever consider friends. Was actually told today by someone on here that "all forms of extremists are dangerous"... yeah, because having so much compassion for animals and the fucking planet that I consider the effects of my choices every single day could somehow be harmful. Crazy.

some TERFs #sexist reddit.com

Re: Hey heterosexual radfems, how do you date men?

(liesarenotacceptance)
I don't date. It's much better for my emotional and physical health. I'm not lonely. I have friends. I have a dog. I have Netflix. At this point I'm so used to being in control of my own home, body, and time, I think trying to date someone who's been socialized his whole life to expect me to be his damn servant would just annoy the Hell out of me.

(atasheep)
Not straight but I’d guess they pick the least worse or something? Besides those who think they boyfriend is different from all men.

(womenopausal)
I don't. Since the porn explosion, I haven't found a man who can fuck worth a damn and I don't need one for anything else.

(PaleCornflowerBlue)
Dating radfem is an oxymoron. As you've already pointed out all men are dangerous and you have to be constantly on guard and expect them to do some shit. Ie you waste a ton of emotional recourses to just be with a man, and wasting recourses on men and risking yourself is not really what radfem teaches you.

You're not "doomed" to be alone. Loneliness is not painful if you have female friends and see a person and friend in yourself. We're taught that we're nothing without men, that we're incomplete without relationship, that we're worthless if no one loves us in a dick way. Those are all lies to keep us depending on men. There are plenty other ways to bring excitement into your life that don't involve men

(ExternalBid)
I agree with this. Dating/being in a relationship with/ marrying men are not feminist decisions. They can be choices that can improve your personal happiness but to try to reconcile them with feminism is futile imo

(gendercriticalonly)
I don’t anymore. I did for many years, and the power imbalance always came out, the expectations and such like. I decided that I wasn’t sufficiently bothered to compromise on this (I like my own company, I have friends and family, I enjoy doing things alone). If I came across someone, and we hit it off, great. Otherwise, it’s not something I want that badly.

I know exactly one man in a relationship with a woman who seems to just act like a person in a relationship with another person, no politics or manipulation or threats to sense of identity or domestic ineptitude or whatever. He’s a grown up, and he just gets on with things when they need to be done, and he supports his wife and loves his children and supports and encourages them without respect to gender. One man. Out of every one I know.

So it’s possible, but I wouldn’t hold my breath.

(StunningGift)
I've never dated a man and I'm worried about what would happen when I try. I learned that I'm still susceptible to manipulation by men, but I'm thankful it's only a friendship that I'm in and not a relationship because I'm not sure if I'd be able to quit it without being hurt first.

I know some women who take chances to date men, and even my 50yo mother hasn't learned all men are out to disappoint, manipulate and abuse. I'm not even sure how she justifies her choice at this point.

Sasha Spencer #conspiracy rexdeus.com

Insider Exposes Hollywood’s Satanic Underside

Hollywood Acting is Demon Possession

Cautioning us to never idolize any “Star”, our insider says all successful actors, stars, celebs and so on, have been heavily compromised in order to achieve their “dream”. Some are clones of stars who have been replaced.

One of the most revealing exposes of Hollywood. No depravity is too great for Hollywood’s Illuminati Elite who play central role in inducting society into their Cabalist satanic cult.

We all know that Hollywood is perverse but an insider has posted new information that is beyond the pale. It confirms everything I encountered when I flitted along the margins of show business in the 1980’s and much more, including human cloning and child sacrifice.

Film sets are sexually highly charged. My own encounters with show-biz strangeness ran the usual gamut of offers to sleep and play with producers and other power players, group sex and so on.

Or, upon being cast as the lead in a play, in a fairly large city (which could have really helped me along), I realized that I needed to “live with” and “sleep with” the octogenarian director for the duration of the theater run.

I declined the part.

Or, finding out a cast member’s girlfriend is really a she-male, or a famous Country-Western singer likes to be used as a human toilet.

Or, going back stage to meet Danny Thomas, the star of “Make Room for Daddy” after a performance. He grabbed me and rammed his tongue down my throat.

What price to make it in show biz? There are two realities to the industry. First, there are the insider blood line types who, when they get out of film school, a call is made and the career is launched. Shirley MacLaine and Warren Beatty might be an example. Many of these people come from multigenerational abuse families. It also helps if you are Jewish. I am not.

Then there are the nobodies who eventually come across the pay to play scenario. Basically prostitution, sleeping with producers, directors and so on, and being on call as an escort. If you say no, your career goes nowhere.

[According to author Darwin Porter, many stars including James Dean, Rock Hudson, Marilyn Monroe and Lucille Ball, started their careers as prostitutes. Hoover & Tolson: Sexual Secrets of America’s Most Famous Men and Women (2012).]

That is why you have never heard of me! The author of the expose and I both shared the moniker of right brain, creative types who were idealistic and naive about the world. It’s what saved us both in the long run.

THE GROOMING STAGE

In order to reach the higher echelons of entertainment with no family or tribe connections, you must work yourself up through the drug use/sexual permissiveness/prostitution/escort stages to things like mind control, handlers, and into darker levels of spiritual possession or soul-loss at a profound level.

This sets the stage for the performer to become part of a very dark world. Artists who resist are a huge threat.

So the Controllers compromise you in some way with evidence of your perversions, or they threaten you, or they finally kill you.

And if you are a big money-maker, you are often replaced, and I don’t mean by another actor. This way, “you” or the 2.0 version of you, can keep on making money for the dark side!

We are talking about losing one’s Soul people!

And… it’s real!

YOU CAN BE CLONED

Cloning has been around for many decades. We just are kept in the dark about it.

Our former entertainer has many stories to relay of how famous celebrities changed in character and looks. Her suspicion is that they had been replaced. She names such stars as, Michael Jackson, Ann Margaret, Joan Baez, Jane Fonda and Jennifer Connolly.

She had friends in the industry who knew these entertainers personally and believed they had indeed been replaced.

She also mentions Bob Dylan. Recently, I saw an interview with Dylan who was on 60 Minutes, and he admitted on camera that he had indeed made a deal with the devil long ago!

Bob didn’t look happy.

Replacement can be confusing to detect because many stars have plastic surgery with horrific results. Basic mutilation. Think Mickey Rourke or Priscilla Presley.

In their cases, extreme surgeries could be used as a form of torture to “fall in line” or the actor /performer is replaced. The surgery takes place after the cloning to improve the original.

Clones never live up to the originals. They deteriorate rapidly. There are many subtle differences. However, many actors will do anything to their bodies and minds to work in Hollywood. Most are damaged people.

Cautioning us to never idolize any “Star”, our insider says all successful actors, stars, celebs and so on, have been heavily compromised in order to achieve their “dream”.

I mean, after all, show business is just a distraction. In ancient Rome, the poet Juvenal describing the political power scene of the day said, “Panem et Circenses” (Bread and Circuses). Meaning, if you keep the masses fed and entertained, they are less likely to kill or even notice their invisible handlers.

So it all boils down to the elite and the demonic force that is behind them.

She spoke of the Madonnas who groom the younger women to eventually take their place with the sexual/psychic rituals. She said that all these women are mind controlled and abused.

Our insider states, many celeb charity boards are fronts for prostitution, sex trafficking and drugs. Many celebs are set up with boyfriends and marriages that are arranged. The actresses agree to do porn in exchange for all the perks of being with a rich man but knowing they will lose it all if they break up with the guy.

HUMAN SACRIFICE

Snuff films are just human sacrifices. These films are done when a sex slave/prostitute/call boy, has gotten slightly haggard and past their “sell by” date or has pissed off the wrong people.

There is a huge market for these satanic sacrifice films among the exclusive, connected and wealthy circles i.e. the demonic Illuminati.

She also touches on the pregnant actresses who are suddenly not pregnant. Their babies are used for human sacrifice. She claims Bristol Palin has been pregnant four times and three of the babies disappeared. She was suddenly not pregnant. You can read more about this here.

Our actress believes there is a long list of famous people who have sacrificed a child, including many political figures.

Many mysterious accidents have happened to big name people and thereafter, magically, their career takes off.

Now I know where the saying comes from, whereby in signing a contract, people joke about giving up their first born child! For example, George Bush Sr. had two little girls that died. Ever heard of them?

Remember Barbara Bush keeping a fetus in a jar?

I can attest to this phenomenon and I am very suspicious. Shortly after my beautiful young mother was killed in a horrific “accident”, weeks after the death, I was invited to Washington D.C. by a U.S. Senator.

My father was his financial campaign manager. I went to the home of George Bush, Sr. for a party. Holding Poppy’s hand and chatting with Barbara, I remember being in total and complete shock and profoundly disassociated from my body at the time and for years afterward.

Soon after this Presidential visit, my father’s career took off like gangbusters and we soon had oodles of money and a family jet. And who was flying in that jet? Henry Kissinger among many other elites. Pretty suspicious if you ask me.

A Sacrifice?

I don’t know. But, it makes me want to go hmm… mm…mm…Mammon?

KANSAS NO MORE

Our informant ran into the Dark Arts very early on. These dark arts are ruled by the Illuminati/reptilian/negative ET’s, negative humans/military industrial complex.

The negative gatekeepers need a certain number of true artists, light worker types as camouflage. Sometimes these light types are targeted to move to a higher level on the playing field.

At the same time they are surrounded by relatively nice “handlers” who don’t corrupt them. But, the conclusion is that at some point everyone in the industry has to make the decision to yield to the corruption or get out.

That is, if it’s not too late. We are human batteries to them. They pilfer our higher energy.

Drugs, alcohol and spiritual possession make it a much easier choice for the actor/performer to compromise, to think “I’ll do anything to get a job”.

That is when the evil really steps in. Many of these people keep drugging and drinking to make their harrowing dark choice “OK”.

But, many cannot keep up the illusion and want out at some point.

If they protest or tell the truth of what is really going on…they are often replaced. They become surrounded by dark people, dark organizations and dark non-humans (ET’s or hybrids). Once this happens they barely have control over what happens next.

Many victims of this satanic industry are those who have no family ties to speak of. Their lives are easier to erase and dispose of. All planned, all by design.

CONCLUSION:

We, The people, especially in the West, have allowed Hollywood hype to distort our sense of reality. None of this is by accident. All has been carefully planned.

Our world is held hostage by an illusion run by a Satanic cult.

The classic Faustian Deal with the Devil is real. See this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deal_with_the_Devil. This contract made by many in the entertainment industry, allows something horrible to possess the individual spiritually, physically, emotionally and sexually. One’s entire being is consumed by dark energy and personal free will is extinguished. Many artists take the deal. I don’t think it ever works out well for any of them; as there is no honor among thieves.

Bakershalfdozen #fundie onlinebaptist.com

Kay, it is never right to murder. Your scenario is situational ethics. Women have more options these days: places to go and people who will adopt that baby.

Most "scenarios" presented are tear-jerking sob stories that represent the minority of abortion cases. The majority of women who abort do so for convenience's sake.

Napier, Lionsib, even Sven ,Joey p, infovore #fundie boards.straightdope.com

on being friends with a pedophile that actively downloads real child porn


Napier: Tough one. I said I'd remain his friend, but without having experienced this scenario I can't say I'm sure


LIONsob: Stay friends and think that the prosecution is politicaly motivated thought-policing.


Joey P : I'd feel sorry for him but remain friends with him. He knows he has a problem and he deals with it in such a way that he's not harming anyone. What he does in his own house, by himself is his business, not mine, not anyone elses.


even sven: I'd have no problem remaining friends with him. People have all sorts of strange fantasies, and as long as you can recognize the difference between fantasy and reality, I see nothing wrong with beating off to whatever.

infovoreAs long as Al has never done anything to a real child and proactively keeps himself away from children, I would remain his friend. I would feel very sorry for him and it would probably squick me out--I'm not sure that the friendship would continue in the same form that it did before the material was discovered. But as long as he had not and would not hurt, bother, or otherwise cause mental or physical harm to actual kids, then yes, I'd stay his friend.

Newcel04 #racist #sexist incels.co

[Discussion] World vs Latino Race War? Opinions?

If white people become the minority in the USA, then Latinos, the second largest group, will take over the USA. They will have access to the entire US military. They will give nuclear weapons to each latino country. The only other countries with nuclear arsenals are Asian and European countries. Who would win?

Asian stats: Smartest,60% world population, can develop tech,have nukes
White stats:Smart,10% world population, can develop tech, have nukes
Latino stats:Stupid, 15% world population, cannot develop tech, will have nukes but cannot develop them
Black stats:Stupid,25% world population, cannot develop tech, no nukes
Sand stats: Not smart or stupid, average intelligence, very small population, may develop tech, no nukes
Abo stats:Stupidest, very small population, cannot develop tech, no nukes

The results of this race war will greatly affect the perception of men around the world, and change the smv of many, many men.

How is this related to inceldom?

it will affect the smv of each race of men depending on who wins

Retarded, you are counting smarts here in terms of ability to execute and /or follow instructions.
That counts for something in being able to manage a stable system, which is what u have in riceland, but in the scenario you envision that is meaningless, the only smarts that counts is ability to think from scratch, innovate, and apply quantitative concepts to qualitative issues, once these have been identified by innovative thinking.
Only 4 races are adept at this, Ashkenazi Jews, Nordics, germanics, and IIT/M, so you're Asians are smartest goes for a toss, Asians would sit between non Nordic/ Germanic whites and sands in terms of smartness.
Other than that your xp points seen fairly distributed

Lol no. Asians (Rice and Curry) have the highest iq in the world

Nope, they have just been doing Iq tests since the age of 5.
Whatever IQ they do have they are unable to apply in any real situation, so they would be screwed in any of these scenarios.
Agree they are the best human calculators, which carries you a long way in IQ tests, but that's not smarts. Those 4 are the only smart races, and one of those 4 is from curryland

image

W. F. Price #sexist web.archive.org

[Note: This is from W. F. Price's now-defunct personal blog Welmer, also his old screenname]

Perhaps nothing illustrates our society’s blindness concerning the true nature of female sexuality as clearly as the widely held belief that rape is anathema to female desire. If my suspicions are correct, this fiction is likely tied to the same paternalist sub-theology that is responsible for feminism, the family law industrial complex, and widespread, legalized discrimination against men. However, before I get into any speculation here, let’s take a look at the evidence.

...

If Hutson’s inference is correct, more than half of women likely have fantasies of being raped, and in perhaps up to one in four women these are their preferred and most common fantasies. Other studies are referenced in the article as well, if you care to research them yourself.

...

If anything caters to tawdry female fantasies, it is romance novels (as well as soaps and dramas). 54% is no coincidence here. Furthermore, Whiskey remarked in one of the comments on my “Mad Men = Female Porn” post that “Mad Men had a couple of rape scenes where the bad boyfriends rape the women the they love.”

So, it being established that rape fantasies are a core component of female sexuality, Hutson goes on to explore why this might be the case. He offers up a number of potential explanations, including, among others, sexual blame avoidance, “male rape culture”, and biological predisposition to surrender. While I reject outright the “male rape culture” explanation (I will explain why shortly), sexual blame avoidance makes some sense, and probably is more relevant to American culture in particular, but I think the biological predisposition to surrender is the most likely explanation.

Suggesting that some “male rape culture” that makes rape normative exists in America is ridiculous on its face. For one thing, rape was originally treated as a crime against men first, and society second. In Deuteronomy, for example, the rapist is punished mainly for his transgression against the husband if the woman is married, and against the father if she is not. This concept continued to be reflected in criminal law until quite recently, when the state took on the role of the father, and then finally the husband as well. In fact, the spate of Mexican rapes of young women and girls that accompanied mass immigration over the last fifteen years or so was in part the result of a cultural misunderstanding. In the old Catholic tradition, which still has considerable influence in Mexico, rape was not considered much worse than fornication (which was a big no-no), and could in many cases be expiated by marrying the victim — this is why the victims of these rapes were almost exclusively unmarried young women; raping a married woman is seen as a far more heinous crime in that particular culture. Rather than a cultivating a “rape culture,” what we see men doing in societies around the world is criminalizing and discouraging rape because it is contrary to their interests.

As the authority of the state has increased over all Americans, we still see the same principle of rape being a crime against more than simply the female victim, but the offense against the husband or father is no longer relevant — instead it is the jealous state (paternal authority) that is now the aggrieved party. So morally speaking (from the feminist point of view), there is little difference between now and then, but practically speaking the scope of prosecution has widened considerably. Given these circumstances, any suggestion that there is a “culture of rape” in America is absolutely ridiculous.

Because rape is a very primal threat to men, acting on a deep-seated insecurity about his relationship to the women in his life, it is likely that the taboo against acknowledging this aspect of female sexuality is rooted in men’s desire to have a more comfortable and less stressful view of the women upon which they have invested so much of their emotional well-being. It is little different from the husband who sees his wife as a “good girl,” only to find out the truth the hard way when she commits some sexual indiscretion.

Despite the comfort that this taboo may bring to some, I would argue that it is a dangerous thing to deny the truth of human nature — even sexuality. Not only does this blind men and keep them from gaining a deeper understanding of the women around them, it also leads women to feel confused and ashamed about feelings and desires that they apparently have little control over. It is possible that the high rate of false rape accusations and obsession over the subject in America is in fact a result of confused, repressed feelings, which lead some mentally disordered women to project their fantasies onto innocent men.

We have to accept that there are dark, uncomfortable aspects to both male and female sexuality, and that neither gender in particular is any more guilty than the other. In fact, neither is guilty at all; we are sexual beings equipped with emotions and desires that, although often mysterious, serve a greater purpose than our rational minds can comprehend.

[Comment by same fundie in response to a comment about Biblical leniency with regards to rape]

Sorry, Warren, I’m not too shocked by those passages. The Bible is not meant to be read like a British tabloid.

As for the Jewish rape angle, you’ll have to think about when the relevant books were written. Well before 300 BC for the most part.

Then, let’s take some European pagan practices into account. Fortunately, we have some good documentation from the Romans. I seem to remember a certain sack of Judea by Titus Flavius Vespasianus. Some coins were minted commemorating the Roman victory that portrayed a bound Jew and his weeping wife, under a caption that read “IVDEA CAPTA“.

Somehow, I doubt these women were all appointed to positions as consular interns.

Condemning the ancient Hebrews on the basis of contemporary “morality” is laughable. I hope you can do better next time.

I will say, however, that the one man who successfully did challenge their morals – in the 1st century AD no less – inspires deep humility in me.

...

Agreed. But men should know of these urges as well. We’ve really got to stop fooling ourselves about women.

I’m starting to doubt whether most women can be trusted to moderate their behavior without male authority to guide them.

...

Lukobe, given that the source of so much male misbehavior is female influence, and that this has traditionally been kept in check by other males’ influence, I don’t know exactly how that should be answered.

Perhaps it is simply the provenance of men to govern both men and women.

Maybe men can more effectively govern men by better governing women. In fact, I think that is the best answer. The men in power today have failed miserably in their duty to govern women.

Sue Bohlin #fundie probe.org

"I am a high school student writing a paper for English over some hatred issues across America and I was wondering if you would answer some questions about marriage equality, gender issues, etc.

Why do you, personally, dislike homosexual behavior?"

For the same reason I dislike heterosexual behavior (like using pornography or unmarried or extramarital sex) that is outside of God’s plan and purpose for our bodies and souls: it is harmful to the person(s) engaging in it. Sex is so powerful, like electricity, that it needs to be contained within the safe confines of marriage between a man and a woman who have committed to each other for life. Outside of that containment, the power of sex is more like lightning, which does damage instead of being channeled into serving us.

But homosexual behavior is not just about sex. There is also a lot of emotional dependency in same-sex relationships, especially between girls and women, when their friendship has overflowed the banks of what is healthy. Emotionally dependent relationships are intense (which becomes exhausting), chaotic (which drains people further), controlling and manipulative (which is hurtful to the people and to the relationship). I dislike this behavior because it is harmful to the people engaging in it as well. I love people and hate to see them get hurt. That’s why I dislike the behavior that contributes (eventually) to heartache.

"If anyone of your family members became homosexual, how would you react?"


That already happened, when one of my relatives was seduced into lesbian relationships and started seeing herself as part of the LGBT community. I continued to love her, encourage her, delight in her . . . even though we don’t talk about her relationships or her involvement in LGBT.

I have two grown sons, though, which is the closer kind of family I think you may be thinking of. If either one of them announced they were gay, I would weep that he had been deceived by our spiritual enemy into thinking falsehoods about himself, and I would pray every day for his eyes to be open to the truth, even as I continued to love him like I do now.

"Why do you think God doesn’t love homosexual people and their behaviors?"


I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that God dearly and tenderly loves those who struggle with same-sex attraction, those who have embraced a gay identity, and even those who have fully immersed themselves in the LGBT world. I’m thinking of one young man in particular who went on a two-week bender, prostituting himself for gay sex so he could buy drugs and keep himself high. I know that his decisions grieved God’s heart deeply (especially when he became HIV+ during that 2 weeks), but He never left the man or stopped loving him, and was there waiting patiently for him to come to his senses . . . which he did. And now their relationship is stronger than ever.

If God loved people, ALL people, enough to send His only Son into the world to be nailed to a cross, taking our place and paying the penalty for our sin and then raising Him from the dead, then I think He continues to love all of us in our messy, sinful rebellion. But He never endorses or accepts our sinful behavior, though He fully accepts US. Acceptance and approval of choices and behaviors are not the same.

You may have noticed I went from talking about homosexuals to US . . . because we are all in the same predicament: messy, sinful, rebellious people who desperately need God. There is no us/them differentiation—we are all alike in our need for God, and we are all alike in the fact that He loves us more than we can imagine.

"Do you believe in abortion, and why?"


I think it is a heinous thing to murder a baby, whether he or she lives inside the mother or outside the mother. Abortion is taking the life of an innocent child, and it’s wrong to murder.

"And do you consider Probe Ministries a hate group?"

Absolutely not! We were tagged a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center because we don’t agree with the LGBT agenda. We align ourselves with the Bible’s standards that all sex outside of marriage violates God’s commands for human sexuality. Unfortunately, these days mere disagreement is called hate. I have repeatedly invited people to identify the hate-filled words on our website so I can change them, but no one has ever identified any. I believe that is because you won’t find words of hate on our website, or our podcasts, or any of our recorded messages. (And I do know what hate sounds like. Westboro Baptist Church makes me sick.)

I’m the primary writer and speaker about homosexuality and gender issues for Probe. It might be helpful for you to know that for 18 years I have also served with Living Hope Ministries, which is a Christian organization that helps people deal with unwanted homosexuality, and the family members of those who have chosen to embrace a gay identity. I have known and grown to love more people than I can count, people who are my heroes as they fight their feelings and instead, pursue intimacy with Jesus Christ. I have watched so many people’s hearts change over time, and I have walked with a lot of women as they process the reasons for their attractions and experience a shift in their beliefs and attitudes (and sometimes attractions as well, though not always). They are so very dear to me, and I love being their cheerleader and encourager.

That’s the opposite of hate. That’s what love looks like, and that’s what is the foundation of everything I write and say on this issue.

It might also be helpful for you to know that I have run everything I write and say through the filter of trusted friends who were once part of the LGBT community, asking them to identify anything that is unintentionally hurtful or rude or even untrue so I can change it before it becomes public.

I’m glad you asked, and I am thankful for the opportunity to provide you with some answers.

Have a good day.

Warmly,
Mrs. Bohlin

Harry #fundie angryharry.com

Imagine, for the moment, that tomorrow morning you - a man - woke up to find that some unholy menstrual gas had escaped into the ether, and that, henceforth, most women only fancied lesbians. All of a sudden, your hopes and dreams of getting it together with a decent woman would be completely thwarted.

And if no woman thereafter ever even considered you to be a welcome intimate prospect, it would drive you insane!

And you would also be furious at those lesbian women who were getting their greedy hands on all the goodies.

Your goodies.

Up and down the street they would parade themselves with their girlfriends and their womenfolk hanging on to their arms - but you have no chance at all.

You would envy those lesbian women, and you would hate them for persistently luring away from you all those lovely women whom you desire so strongly - and so often!

And so you would do your best to undermine the standing of those lesbian women, and you would try to demonise them as best as you could, in the hope that women might be turned away from them, and instead start being attracted to you.

And I also imagine that this would be especially true on days like Valentine's Day, when no romantic card popped through your front door, and you felt particularly lonely and unwanted.

Well, this is the situation in which many lesbians do, in fact, find themselves.

There are all these gorgeous heterosexual women around the place, but they have no interest in them.

Nope. They are just not interested.

"We want a penis," they will say. "Vaginas just will not do."

They are jealous. They are envious. They are sexually frustrated.

And, in my view, this is why so much of the hatred towards men is fuelled by lesbian woman. They are jealous. They are envious. They are sexually frustrated. And they are angry; because men get a zillion times more access to those gorgeous heterosexual women whom they so desperately want for themselves.

And it is precisely because there are not enough women who are lesbian for them that these particular lesbians also sneak their way into places like domestic violence shelters which are packed full of women who are currently alleging abuse. They are always trying to wheedle their way closer to those women who might seem as if they could be particularly easy to 'turn'.

"That was an awful experience. Men are terrible. Here, hold my hand," they will tell them.

"Men are abusive and disgusting. Here, let me put my hand upon your knee."

"A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. So, show me your sweet little triangle and I'll show you mine."

Yep: This is what is going on out there.

Oh Angry Harry. You are such a fool. You don't really believe that many lesbians hate men and so try to drive a wedge between men and women simply because they are jealous, envious and sexually frustrated, do you?

Yes.

I do.

Just imagine what it would be like for heterosexual men if just about every woman whom they ever wanted to be with had absolutely no interest in them because they were attracted only to lesbians. Many men would probably do exactly what many of these particularly hateful lesbian 'feminists' are, in fact, doing. They would do their best to turn women against lesbians, and they would also hate lesbians.

Well, isn't this the very sort of thing that seems to be going on?

And did we not see a similar thing happening when blacks and whites first started intermingling their private parts

And did we not see a similar thing happening when blacks and whites first started intermingling their private parts in significant numbers some years ago? There was some resentment on both sides of the fence.

And how else would you account for the fact that a very high relative percentage of the 'feminists' who blatantly stir up hatred towards men are, indeed, lesbians?

Why is it that those who know the least about men are so hateful towards them?

Why is it that those who can most happily avoid all intimate relationships with men feel so impelled to damn them?

How is it that those people who know the least about men seem to attack them the most?

There is only one answer, in my view, that fits the evidence.

they hate men for attracting away from their clutches the very women whom they, themselves, desire.

And this is that these particular lesbian women are jealous, envious and sexually frustrated, and they hate men for attracting away from their clutches the very women whom they, themselves, desire. And they also attempt to gain access to more women both by seeking out those who are currently angry with men and, hence, who will likely more easily be seduced by them, and by trying to demonise men in the eyes of all heterosexual women in order to encourage more of them to give up on men.

Well, that's my opinion!

freedomwarrior #fundie theresistancemanifesto.com

God is Jesus,Jesus is God-If buddha was someone special he would have mentioned the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

He fails and is a false prophet thats going to lead loads of ignorant souls with him to hell.

Can you imagine getting rid of an evil spirit(demon) in the name of buddha?
Healing a sick person in the name of buddha?
Doing spiritual warfare in buddha's name?

Nope.... it just won't happen!

Calvin Freiburger #fundie liveactionnews.org

[ In certain circumstances, the war analogy makes sense. When a woman is raped, she has been attacked by an enemy. Her right to defend herself from further violation via abortion is analagous to "collateral damage" deaths during war. If pro-lifers find "collateral damage" deaths during war acceptable, then they don't have much of a leg to stand on when the topic is abortion for rape/incest. A similar analogy could be made for women who are being attacked by disease. Just because these are rare cases doesn't mean they don't exist. I'm against abortion on demand but I would reserve a woman's right to abortion under these circumstances.

Pro-lifers will say the baby isn't the attacker, but neither are the innocent civilians, including children and babies, who are killed during war. Babies who are killed during war are just as much "murdered" as babies who are aborted. ]

Nope, doesn't hold up at all. In just war, the collateral damage is unintentional, and the military actively tries to avoid it as much as realistically possible. They're not saying, "we're gonna specifically target this civilian, but for a good reason." In abortion, the baby is directly and intentionally destroyed.

Plus, you still have the problem of proportionality to deal with. In just war, the civilian deaths will hopefully be outweighed by a greater number of lives saved in the long run. Whereas the baby's death isn't at all proportional to the 9 months of pregnancy we're trying to avoid, as bad as it can be.


[ So because collateral damage is unintentional that makes it okay? You don't have a problem with thousands of innocent women and children being bombed to death? Gosh maybe the military shouldn't have been so risky. Maybe they should have abstained from war.

Plus, you can't measure how much hell 9 months of pregnancy + giving baby up for adoption could be. An unwanted pregnancy (even a wanted pregnancy) is life changing, whether you keep the baby or not. And it could affect many women in really negative ways that aren't worth it. Not to mention women who have been raped. They have to live with their rapist's collateral damage for 9 months? I don't think so. ]

Nowhere did I say collateral damage is "okay." I said it's an unavoidable reality when war is necessary. And in the interest of understanding just where your objection is coming from, please lay your cards on the table: are you a full-on pacifist, or do you accept that war is sometimes necessary, like in WWII? If you accept the concept of just war, then you are also accepting the reality of collateral damage, and therefore there's nothing to debate here.

Lastly, there's simply no debating with heartlessness that can describe an innocent human life as a "rapist's collateral damage".......

Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter #racist jonathanturley.org

[Comment under Clemson Dean Calls For Students To Pass “Intercultural Competency” Test As A Pre-Condition for Holding School Offices]

What this all means is that White Folks are supposed to accept without question, as a matter of cultural sensitivity:

1) That high illegitimate birth rates as a normal Negro thing, even though it wasn’t before LBJ and the Great Society started paying extra for bast*rd children;

2) That Illegal Alien Mexicans are a great thing for America, even though cheap labor hurts broke and jobless Americans, and drives down wages across the board;

3) That Anal Sex is just as important as the kind of sex that makes babies. Because. Orga*sms.

4) That even though Blacks and Mexicans are just as good as everybody else, we have to give them special gifts and privileges;

5) That White People are the worst race of people to ever live, and no other race in history of the world ever engaged in warfare, conquered other lands, or kept slaves. Heck, before the White Folks came to America, the redskins, I mean Native American Victims, didn’t even know what a tomahawk, or a bow and arrow. Nope, they just went around growing organic vegetables, and swapping Quartz Crystals among themselves, and smoking dope, and taking peyote. They were even the original Vegans, and didn’t even eat meat. They kept herds of buffaloes as pets!

6) That White People should just STFU, pay for all the losers in society, and ignore the black crime rate, and high illegitimate birth rate, and not snicker during Black Pride Month;

7) And finally, never ever say the “N” word, or say “illegal alien”, because that is the worst sin anybody could ever commit, if they are white. If they are black, then it’s OK.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

PS: I could have wrote a book, but I just got some Rockabilly Licks, and I need to practice them.

IMHO #fundie standyourground.com

This is as mad as a balloon.

Here's a situation that will enrage a feminist:-

- what about a woman fucking a man - yes, she's on top; a very popular position we'll all agree. But! The man says "nope, don't wanna do this anymore". But she's bouncing on top of him, regardless of his request. This surely must be rape too, if we are to be consistant.

But...but...but.....

I told you it was as mad as a balloon.

RodgersSecondAdvent #psycho #sexist incels.co


[RageFuel] The fact that women love being raped and humiliated is what makes me unable to have even a grain of respect for these subhumans.

Your average bluepilled numale will shudder at reading the title or throw a massive tantrum in order to uphold his fantasy of the scrupulous, fairer sex. He may deny it because his female "friends" tell him otherwise as only he's stupid enough to take anything that leaves the mouth of a foid for true. #believewomen

Women love being raped, they love being humiliated, they love being dominated, they love feeling small, they love being used as sexual objects and are utterly apathetic when it comes to being respected.

You only need to look at what arouses them the most. A much taller, broad, dominating, deep voiced, brash man. When they say they prefer "confidence", they mean arrogance and narcissism. A relationship with a female couldn't be further removed than a relationship you have with male friends where your friendship is defined by mutual respect and the acknowledgement of standing on equal foot. A female will expect you to take the initiave at all times, outrun agency. In a situation where this happens to not the case, its attraction towards you will dwindle considerably.

Think of the popularity of fifty shades of gray, how females on the rape subreddit try to rape bait men. The biggest enemy of equality are females themselves.

Don't believe whatever a female tells you she's attracted by. Think of my previous thread where females rated their arousal towards bonobo's as minimal when the plethysmograph registered something entirely different. They have both subhuman self-awareness and are massive liars.

Tell me, how the hell am I supposed to respect these creatures that can hardly be viewed as people?

State of the Nation #conspiracy stateofthenation2012.com

The Internet is now overwhelmed by misinformation, disinformation and false information about the Washington, D.C. scandal known primarily as Pizzagate.

This alarming report has been prepared to provide both the global context and additional perspective for concerned people throughout the entire planetary civilization. Pedogate is going on practically everywhere.

For newcomers to this subject material, it is especially urgent to read this entire “Special Report” so that the Pizzagate lexicon and Pedogate back story can be properly understood. We also highly recommend the following excellent ebook: PIZZAGATE FOR DUMMIES for those who are unfamiliar with the Pizzagate back story.

Pedogate is Global, Pizzagate is Local

Many have complained that Pizzagate should be called Pedogate.

In fact, Pizzagate is just one of many Pedogates occurring around the world at this very moment. As the title indicates, “Pizzagate Represents Only a Single American Franchise Within a Worldwide Child Trafficking Operation Known As Pedogate“.

It’s true that Pizzagate is a uniquely American franchise that operates primarily in Washington, D.C., but also includes operations in New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles and other major metropolitan areas.

There are many other Pedogates, which have nothing to do with Pizzagate, taking place all over America at this time. Are these related? Yes, some much more than others.

For instance, the ongoing Hollywood Pedogate is joined at the hip with the D.C. Pizzagate. The very reason that many Hollywooders came out of the woodwork to support Hillary R. Clinton and bash Donald J. Trump is because of this close association of decade-long child abuse scandals in both D.C. and Tinseltown.

The most critical point here is that Pizzagate is the lynchpin that is inextricably connected to all the other Pedogates. Because it represents the child exploitation operation in the nation’s capital and related power centers, its outing has the capacity to expose the whole bloody child abuse culture. Yes, Pizzagate is that prominently configured within the world-wide Pedogate scandal. It’s not the grand-daddy like the Brussels Pedogate, but it involves a Who’s Who of American society and especially the political class.

Pizzagate is much more serious than previous Pedogates

Why did Pizzagate blow wide open…just before the election?

First, it’s important to understand that Pizzagate was revealed by the double whammy of the Podesta WikiLeaks and Anthony Weiner’s 650,000 emails. In other words, the time had come for this pedophilia in high places to be blown wide open. Because it all went down just a couple of weeks before the most contentious election in U.S. history, the whole world was watching the American political theater with utter amazement.

This is the timing and environment in which Pizzagate was first disclosed. Since the very first disclosures, it has gathered momentum that just won’t quit. In fact with each day comes new information and startling realizations about just how BIG this thing really is. That Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and John Podesta are at the epicenter of this “Scandal of the Millennium” makes it all the more shocking and hard for many to believe.

Nevertheless, it is these and other dramatic elements that have pushed Pizzagate to the forefront of the news cycle. Especially when the NYT, WashPo and BBC are running front page stories to defend an extremely dubious gay pizza parlor owner, the reader knows that there is something not right. And when FOX News’ Megyn Kelly is featuring an interview with Comet’s notorious James Alefantis that not only exonerates him from all suspicion, but lauds him as a hero of sorts who stared down the Alt Right, something is very wrong indeed.

It’s actually the real back story that is being kept carefully hidden; for were the true details of Pizzagate to leak out to the public, the world would change in a day and a night. The shocking back story of the much larger Pedogate looks like this. Take a very close look at the following excerpt. This short synopsis of the 1980s Franklin Scandal and Cover-up captures the sheer depth and breadth of the crimes being perpetrated against our children.

What the reader needs to understand is that Pizzagate represents only the tip of the iceberg—a global iceberg of profound criminality committed against the children of the world. Not only does it concern a much larger worldwide pedophilia ring known as Pedogate, it also involves an international crime syndicate that trades in the exploitation of children—EVERYWHERE —24/7.

Washington D.C. and the C.I.A.

What makes Pizzagate so very explosive is that all of the key players are deep in D.C. politics and Washington power-plays, US government influence peddling and federal power-brokering. And then there is the C.I.A., often regarded as the intelligence agency that not only controls the many Pedogates occurring nationwide, but also closely monitors each and every one of them. After all, these unimaginable child abuse operations are implemented — first and foremost — as the primary control mechanism that keeps American politicians in complete check.

Why is that so very important?

For the uninitiated, it is crucial to understand that the United States of America has been painstakingly cultivated to function as the military arm of the New World Order (NWO). In this pivotal role the USA takes direction from the financial arm headquartered in the City of London as well as from the religious arm of the NWO located in Vatican. This is why it’s so important for the World Shadow Government to control everything that goes on in Washington, D.C. the high command of the U.S. Armed Forces and military policeman of the world.

Pizzagate has simply uncovered what everyone in Washington has always known. That virtually every politician of note is controlled by having been compromised with an illegal and/or outrageous sexual affair, often with underage children. In once Puritan America this has always been the easiest way to bring down a noncompliant elected official. Of course, if the unlawful and lurid conduct occurred in the context of child rape or satanic ritual sacrifice, their political career not only ended, so was their freedom of movement due to imprisonment.

The C.I.A. has always been notorious for being deeply involved in the top 3 illicit revenue-producing operations of the world. Drug trafficking and arms trafficking are both quite HUGE; however, it is child trafficking that really keeps them in business. The CIA has so many black budgeted operations to fund that they require massive funding from these criminal activities to continue to run them across the planet. Child trafficking also provides a special means to control those in positions of perceived power. However, it is those who occupy the highest echelons of the global power structure who are also taken care of by way of this global pedophilia ring.

This is what really distinguished Pizzagate from all of the other child sexual abuse scandals in high places over the past many decades. It has broken open a prominently configured C.I.A. cell of deeply embed operatives within the international child exploitation business. This particular Pedogate operation is really controlled by the C.I.A., as well as other alphabet soup agencies that no one has even heard of they’re so secret and nefarious in their criminal activity.

What could possibly be more radioactive than pedophilia in high places?

Actually, the pedophilia rings are organized ostensibly as a cover for a much, MUCH more sinister business operation. Those criminal activities routinely carried out include the production of child pornography, both photographs and films, as well as the filming of snuff movies. Other criminal behavior falls within the realm of satanic ritual child sacrifice and blood drinking. The most odious crimes, however, involve child organ trafficking, tissues harvesting and blood extraction.

It’s crucial to comprehend that the C.I.A. does not, and never has, worked for the American people. The Company, as it is also known, works exclusively for the Military Industrial Complex and other key Fortune 1000 companies scattered around the globe. The C.I.A. is also employed by select NGOs, which have actually been set up as CIA front companies like the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Global Initiative is just that—a global CIA operation that interpenetrates every kind of corporation that is necessary to perform a blackop wherever it is necessary to have such a benevolent cover.

The Clinton Foundation: A Typical ‘CIA-Directed NGO’ That Is Completely Above The Law

For these and other reasons, both Hillary and Bill Clinton have been implicated in various schemes which have to do with child trafficking. The Pizzagate scandal at Comet Ping Pong is just one that was overseen by Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta–a key figure in the D.C. pedophilia ring along with his brother super-lobbyist Tony Podesta.

The very endeavor that put the Clinton Foundation on the map was its response to the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti. However, a woman who was caught and convicted of child smuggling (33 children) — Laura Silsby — and who Secretary of State Clinton tried to protect from prosecution, also has ties to the Foundation. Which is why the mainstream media (MSM) was eerily silent on this whole criminal matter.

dontcryimalreadydead #fundie reddit.com

Female sex drive- The Alpha v Beta perspective

Chad's perspective:

"Women love sex just as much as men, in fact even more than men."

Average Joe and Incel Larry perspective:

"Females don't like sex or particularly find men attractive. They only have sex to fulfil an ulterior motive like: financial security, increasing their status or to have kids."

Chad's have women openly show sexual attraction or at least easily receptive to their advances along with being fully engaging and active during sex.

Joe's and Larry's are met with a different animal. All they hear is:

• women complain about being hit on in the streets, clubs and bars and how they wish to be left alone.

• Complain about how "creeps" stare at them from a distance.

• Complain that "nice guys" ( aka male friend who developed feelings after getting to know her or guy wanting to be in a relationship but build a solid foundation (friendship) first), only after sex.

• Complain that they're tired of men wanting just sex and sex isn't that important.

• Women who put their boyfriends or husbands in a deadbedroom situation.

-Most importantly they never show overt attraction to men.

For the longest time I've always had the Beta perspective, I didn't know many Chads or what their lives were like so I assumed this was the case for all men especially when I talked about it with other men and they shared my sentiments. It's only in the last few years that I realised their is a small echelon of men that women generally feel sexual attraction too and it makes me depressed that I'll never be one of them.

BrapZilian #sexist #psycho incels.co

[JFL] Chad crying because a foid sucked his dick
image

TranscriptMales can indeed be raped.
Serious

I don't know if this is rape or sexual assault, either way here's the story:
(Note: I'm an italian 14-15 yr old.)
A week ago, I ended my friendship with a girl I've been friends for over 5 years. I had to do this rough cut because she raped me. A week ago, me and her we're having a sleepover, when everyone was asleep I suddenly woke up due to a funny feeling in my dick.
First thing I see is the only friend I trust sucking on my dick for no absolute reason, I tried to speak but she slapped my mouth and, i pulled her hand away and asked "What the fuck are you doing?"
She replied with: "Something I wanted to do for a long time." I said stop but she kept going, At this point I could take no more, I stood up and tried to take my phone from the table I put it on and call the police, but she grabbed my arm and pulled me down, next thing I know my virginity was gone as she just sits on my dick.
The story goes on as you'd expect, In the morning I went home as fast as I could, told this to my parents and they called the police.
I really need to talk to someone about this because this story is insane, even if I talk it deeper with my parents they will just turn it into a lecture like "Why didn’t you just run away?"


JUST
FUCKING
LOL

Numenorean #racist stormfront.org

As dark and depressing as this decent has seemed so far, I believe the rise of European descended mankind will be more glorious and wonderful because of it.

People around us are starting to wake up. People are starting to talk about race, even if using code words. We see it even in the media, but I even hear it at work...quietly. People at work send out email chains in united disgust of Obama, and the federal government and diversity, perversity, and illegal immigration. Comparisons to the American Revolutionary war are being made by common people.

The race card is being declined regularly and it is becoming an embarrassment to use. The NAACP basically was laughed off the media. Sgt. James Crowley stood his ground when called a racist and was "honored" with a white house invitation. Pat Buchanan slights the Jewish Supremacists, blacks, and honors the White race, and he is kept on MSNBC. Race-talk is wildly popular these days. Race talk sells.

Meanwhile, David Duke is preaching all over Europe in universities. The Netherlands are moving towards nationalism at a rapid rate. The BNP, The Freedom Party and many other nationalist organizations are gaining ground, and they are joining forces with each other...and winning elections. They even have seats in the EU. And in America the "Tea Party" rises, angry hordes of white men and women (and children) rattling kosher cages, scaring the wits out of our enemies. The establishment tries to co-opt the Tea Party name, but the anger will not go away and neither will the people. They have an army. We have an idea whose time has come.

And there are 800 million of us. You can't picture 800 million people standing in a line...it's too long. It would circle the earth many times. We are at our zenith of human capital...never have we ever had such numbers. We are not going away anytime soon and every white person is going to learn about what happened to their heritage, their history, and their land...sooner or later, because the truth is not going away either.

Our birth rates are slowing their decline, interracial marriage rates are dropping, and our women are overwhelmingly staying true to mating with our own race, even though overwhelming propaganda is being brought to bear on their minds. What if the propaganda levels cannot be maintained? They have cornered a lion it seems.

I see this situation as a colossal failure of the enemy. Their plan is doomed already. They are uniting us with their hate and persecution. They are now getting desperate and hasty...and making mistakes. I hope it was enjoyable for them to be on top pounding us in the face for 60 years.

Now WE want change. WE are the revolutionaries and the liberals and the subversives; the assassin in the shadows ready to stick knives into the back of diversity with a smile. We are all awakening much too early, we aren't going back to sleep, and we don't get less enraged from here, there will just be more of us. But then, could the outcome of this great power struggle end any other way? We all know in our hearts that the continuity of the white race, victory, is the only possible outcome. They did their best to destroy us and soon it will be our turn. Let's all compete with one another, to be the one who contributes the most to our common struggle - that's what we do best!

Cheers brothers and sisters!

"Karen" #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

You asked how I got into witchcraft (and yes, absolutely, it DOES work!)--well, it's in the family to begin with. All women in my mom's family were witches from day 1. She's German (a war bride) and lived thru WWII. Her hatred of God is unbelievable. She would always tell me her war stories when I was growing up--imagine telling a 4, 5 year old kid about shot up people and bombs and bullets going off everywhere. Her favorite one is where the street melted from the heat of the fires and bombs...a woman was stuck in the melted street holding a baby up high trying to save it from the flames. There was no way to save them and she cried out to God to help them. Nothing happened. She watched the woman and baby burn up before her eyes. As she tells the story, you can see evil taking over her. She shakes her fist to heaven and says "where was God?". Of course that proves he doesn't exist.

Well, it wore me down and by age 8, I had had enough of this "God" that either (a) did not exist or (b) was so unimaginably horrible, I would hate him too. That night I cursed God (age 8) and decided I would follow Satan. Don't laugh--my entry point into the occult was fairy tales. I studied those things and learned about trolls, magic wands, fairies, elves, witches, spell casting...all from fairy tales. Spirit guides were assigned to me by age 12 and I really took off. Yes witchcraft works. It's all about power and control and the power is INSTANT. Immediate gratification.

The price is high. I had an abortion on Walpurgisnacht 1979 (my present husband's baby). I didn't schedule the appointment for that date--it "happened"--a Satanic present. And I had a D & E. It brought me to my knees 5 years later, calling on a God I wasn't even sure existed. I asked to be sent to hell because I deserved to go there and serve my lord Satan for killing a baby. I have never in my life experienced such an agony and literally "breaking" of my heart. The sobs were uncontrollable. I felt something gentle and warm "washing" over me like water, but I wasn't wet. There was a calm and peace that entered me.

I knew I had to get rid of my occult things so I threw away everything--books, jewelry, tarot cards, toys I bought for the kids (He Man, My Little Pony--I even stripped the sheets off the kids beds because of the pictures on them). I went wild cleaning house--there were 19 trash bags out in front of the house next day. I got a King James Bible and devoured it. I read most of the day. After I read the Bible thru once, I began again. I lived and breathed Jesus Christ.

Here I am 14 years later and I thank the Lord Jesus Christ for cleaning me up and setting me on my feet and covering me with himself. Thank you Lord Jesus! I am free of Satan!

Wolfblade111 #homophobia deviantart.com

Takes a sip out of a cup title "SJW Tears.") Aaah, nothing like a good salty drink in the morning...one sec. (Barfs up the water) Bleh! Tastes like Uselessness and Stupidity. Gonna need to use mouth wash after this.

But yes incase you couldn't tell already I'm one of those nerds whose not that big on the whole Progressive Movement of Gay Characters in Fiction. Now hold on a second, I don't hate gay people, men or women. However I do hate a lot of them in fiction. You want to know why?

Because it's blatant Fan Service. It doesn't feel Organic have ANY Substance to it at all.

Blake and Yang or as the ship name is called...Bumblebee. (RIP Transformers Bumblebee your name is now used for a dumb ship.) is obviously fan service.

These two felt like Sisters at the beginning and now...now it's just awkward. Ya know how ya have those fantasies of sleeping with two hot sisters? In your mind it seems Hot, but I'm sure if somehow such a situation Actually presented itself to you, well first you'd probably pinch yourself to see if your dreaming, then once you realized you weren't and you had any sense about you you'd Nope the fuck outta there cause that'd be just too damn awkward. Unless you're one of those really perverted people then in which case Get Help.

Yeah...That's the Bumblebee (YangxBlake) Ship in a nutshell to me. The twisted thing is there are those who ship Yang with Ruby and those two Are Actually Sisters! XD

Then we have Korrasami. Again, seems all well and good on Paper but it just...came outta left field and not in a good way. You could Literally feel the writers write Mako out of the story and just FORCE these two together, again, I see these two as having a sisterly relationship. One second they're best friends and then the next they're suddenly into each other. Korra I could see as being Bi, she's a Tomboy after all, I could see it. Sure maybe Asami too, but together? This is why fiction and gay characters these days don't really work. Because all it ever feels like is for Propaganda and NOT actual character development.

...


Soldier 76 from Overwatch...that was just outta left field and again, felt like an excuse to have a gay character and they went with the old soldier dude to be different.

So before I go on a day's long rant about how much I hate LGBT in Fiction when it's done wrong. I'm gonna come out and say it.

Ryotte,themius,fathomfear,lenonis #fundie mmo-champion.com

[ (CBS) Larry Dunn Jr. made a chilling confession to cops last week after allegedly stabbing his girlfriend for telling him she was HIV-positive, WFAA-TV reported.

"She killed me, so I killed her."

Dunn, a 36-year-old Texas man, told police that he snapped during a visit to the Dallas apartment of his new girlfriend, 28-year-old Cicely Bolden, on Thursday afternoon, according to WFAA.Bolden apparently revealed her HIV status to Dunn after the couple had sex. (To clarify)Furious, Dunn grabbed a knife from the kitchen and stabbed Bolden to death ]

Ryotte:How is it worse for her to want human affection badly enough and possibly be scared/confused/rejected enough to sleep with him before telling him her HIV status than for him to KILL HER without knowing if he even contracted HIV and leave her body for her 7 and 8 year old kids?
[ Think positive - she could've infected much more people with HIV if she was left alive. The man did good to society by not allowing the disease to spread to more innocent and unuspecting victims ]
Innocent and unsuspecting victims...like the kids who walked in and found their mother dead? Yeah, I'm sure that did positive things for their role in society. DIdn't screw them up at all. Nope.


Themius:This topic is disgusting... people are bashing the dead woman who admits to someone she has HIV and everyone is like.. yeah that's cool I would do it too.If he did have HIV "oh no I may only live to be almost 70! i'm going to kill her!" like really? It's not a death sentence and the guy is so fucking dumb he said he killed him? You know how some transsexuals will have sex with people without telling them till after? This is like that. They feel rejected for who they are on a regular and thus some opt to not say anything until later when the person has more vested feelings in them so that maybe they won't leave them. Is it the right thing? No not necessarily, but is it worthy of death? Absolutely not.

What I want to know is why are we painting her as this horrible woman? I view her more as a victim of circumstance, not some person out to give hiv to everyone. If this was the case she wouldn't have told him and would have had sex with him much more. Sleeping with a transsexual will affect you negatively if they never told you and tell you later, or you find out by some other method. This is very much like that.

yosef1015 :How about this, put your self in her shoes, would you have told him? Your all probably thinking "hell ya i would" but think about it, if she tells him, no sex and he will most likely break up with her. So basically if she tells any guy that she has HIV she will go through life with no sex and no relationships unless she finds that one guy which will be really hard to find. Sex is a powerful thing. Sure I think it was wrong not to tell him but I dont blame her one bit

FathomFear: The fact of the matter is that protecting ourselves from STIs is each individual's responsibility. While I would no doubt be pissed if I slept with a guy who knowingly withheld his HIV+ status, the onus is ultimately on me either way. There's a certain amount of risk that goes along with sexual activity, and everyone needs to be willing to take it on and take appropriate measures. The only 100% safe alternative is abstinence.

lenonis : Up to 500,000 people die worldwide each year because of the flu. So if someone tells me they have the flu after they have sex with me, I can kill them right? Cause I might die from the exposure?

blackpillednormie22 #sexist reddit.com

Saw a brutal interaction today

Was in the campus cafeteria eating some food after my class today, when I saw this girl and guy walking over and sit down on a table next me. They were looks matched about 6/10. They start talking about how they had a bad class but it's over now (since the semester is over). They talk about random shit having a good laugh, seem to be really hitting it off for like 15 mins. So then the guy takes his shot asks her out if she wants to do something over the weekend. She says "Your a cool guy --(antidoxx)-- but I'm not looking for a relationship right now." Saw the light die in his eyes right than and there. He says it's cool and to have a good one and leaves.

So i'm thinking to myself, well he took his shot did his best all you can really ask for. I start to walk to parking lot and notice the girl he was talking to is a little ahead of me. Guess she parked in the same area. We were almost in to the parking lot when this specimen of a man walked out. Chad walks out and just approaches her and asks "Hey do you have a minute? There's this party i'm going to tomorrow and I need a date." The look on her face was pure suifuel. She had this smile that was made of pure Ecstasy and said "Oh I'd love too please." Literally doesn't know his name or anything just says YES. They exchange numbers and i pretend to be on the phone to not draw suspicion that I was eavesdropping.

At the moment it dawned on me that not even 3 minutes ago some guy who was spitting game doing his best just trying to impress this girl and she shut him down instantly the moment he brought up asking her out. I wanted to yell at her "WHAT ABOUT THAT DUDE YOU WERE JUST TALKING TO, WHY WASN'T HE GOOD ENOUGH? NAH FUCK THAT YOU DON'T GET TO DO THAT AFTER THAT GUY WAS BEING YOUR JESTER FOR 15 MINUTES THAT AIN'T FUCKING FAIR" I seriously don't know why I got so emotional i had to run to my car and just turn on the music .

Had https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZa0Yh6e7dw on repeat for like 20 minutes thinking how the fuck did it get this bad.

its ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLF?ake #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

THE POLE SHIFT IS ARTIFICIAL

ITS SOME SORT OF ENERGY GRID THAT LITERALLY USURPS SOUL ENERGIES AND IT TOTALLY JUST UTTERLY TORTURES INNOCENCE ON EARTH ITS A HORRIBLE HARVESTING DEVICE ITS CURRENTLY USURPING A DEATH SPIRAL MAY BE USED BY CERN OR CHINAS UPCOMING DEATH LHC EARTH IS SO FUCKED AND WOMANKIND IS BEING CHANNELLED/PUPPETTED TO SUBDUE FEAR OR SUSPICION

WOW IVE NEVER SEEN A SPECIES SO FUCKED BEFORE
HOW CAN WE STOP THEM??? PERMENATELY STOP THEM??

Actually Autistic #fundie incels.co

[RageFuel] Incels and autists are nothing but cheap labour to society

Society doesn’t care about us in any other way than our ability to perform simple, repetitive tasks for little pay. Once we lose that ability of get tired, our value goes down to zero.

-In highschool I was always the observer
. An observer of people in relationships, watching people kiss, standing in corners while normal kids experienced victory, friendship, happiness travel and all the majestic things normal people get to experience. In groups I was always the one who never said anything, infact nobody knew I was even there

Fast forward to age 23: All anybody cares about is my ability to hold down a job. As soon as I began experiencing medical symptoms, my co-workers went from somewhat nice and acknowledging of me to cold and mean. After being invisible in my youth, I’ve lost what little value I have to people; my ability to lift things and clean things

762x51 #fundie moonbattery.com

"Nope, you people are actively lobbying and legislating to stay in your ever-smaller little circle of like-minded simpletons. The AZ [anti-gay] bill is proof of that – you can’t just shut up and be what you want to be, you have to legislate that you get to be “special” and be allowed to actively discriminate against anyone who isn’t in the Stupid Bubble.

This is why people laugh at you."

Not true jackhole. Many of us are preparing for all out total war against you totalitarian Marxist scum.

We know that you filth cannot be bargained with or reasoned with so further conversation is pointless. Ridding the Earth of turds like you will be a public service. Laugh all you want, no one but RINO’s care what you think of them.

Assholes like you just can’t stand it when you cannot dictate the every day details of American life. If gays want to get married go for but you will NEVER force us to accept you. Going to another store that WILL bake you a wedding cake never occurred to you in the libtard Stupid Bubble. It’s called the free market but cultural Marxists like you don’t believe in that.

I will not comply with your laws or fund your agenda, or recognize your authority and I will never surrender. That is why your leadership, like Bill Ayers, has planned for 30 years to force those of us you cannot intimidate into extermination camps in the south west. When you get around to coming for me come early and wear armor, it’s going to be a long day. Not that a coward like would come personally which is why you have been militarizing the police and arming non-law enforcement agencies like the National Weather Service, Comrade Obama’s private army of Progressive brown shirts.

I have no interest in compromising with you or even hearing what you have to say. I’ll see you on the battlefield, but you won’t see me.

Eden Decoded #fundie facebook.com

Many of the mental illnesses and disorders that women are suffering from is a result of their choice to have an abortion. And the more abortions a woman has, the more mentally unstable she is.

There is a blessing for women who bring life into this world (the right way); and there is a curse for the women that choose to abort (kill) the new life developing in them.

Many of us like to say that God is a loving god, and that mothers (mommies) are next to being god in a child’s life, BUT IN SPITE of this esteemed position women are given—far too many women choose to abuse this role and make excuses for abortion—for their own selfish reasons or personal gain.

You can’t possibly think there is a blessed life for women that do this. Nope, they will be tormented by the spirits that are behind the sin of abortion (and this is the source of many of their mental problems; the Bible is specifically clear about the consequences of the 'shedding of innocent blood')

And it’s about time the church (and those who sit in the pews) honestly discuss this. How can you praise God with an unrepentant murderous heart?

And why with all these Women's Ministries floating around has the number of abortions risen?

Zyrros #sexist reddit.com

There is NO point on love, relationships, infatuation or anything

To be honest I don't see why the fuck are humans capable of love or infatuation when it only leads to suffering if you are not a top male.

you will ALWAYS be tossed aside as soon as a better male appears in the vicinity. There is no point if you are not a male model or at least good looking with GREAT charisma. Just no point.

I had a girl who I liked (not love, but really liked). We had a really really strong freindship and later a bit of more than friends stuff (no, this is not a brag). Our bond and friendship was very strong. Just one day, a guy with similar looks level but more charisma appeared and it all went to shit really quickly with me being left apart for that guy.

Even in freindhsip you will be tossed apart as soon as a better male appears. It isnt worth it anymore. Im living alone all my life without partner, because I don't want to have the constant fear and shadow of another better male appearing in the vicinity and ruining everything.

Its always like this, not only in my story, i saw lots of times this happen to other people too.

If you can be one upped by another male, DONT EVER enter a relationship, DONT EVER have meaningful friendships, DONT EVER let yourself become infatuated, ERASE all feelings because they are pointless.

8+/10 in looks or 7+/10 in loosk+great charimsa OR DEATH

Roberta Laurila #fundie precious-testimonies.com

(=This is one of the pioneers of the Ex Gay movenent, deceased since 2011, and coined the name "Exodus" for Ex Gay Ministry=)

Right from the day of my birth, there was a hint of future problems. When my mother first saw me, she expressed her love for me, then remembered she only had a boy's name chosen. Thus Robert became Roberta.

During childhood, my mother's heart condition and crippling arthritis kept her from doing the usual things with me that my friend's mothers did. I became a loner and a daydreamer. At the age of eight, I was imitating everything my older brother did, from smoking cigarettes to dating girls.

IN LOVE

When I was ten, I "fell in love" for the very first time with my lady school teacher. This crush lasted for three years until our paths separated when I began my freshman year in high school. My heart was grieved until I met a beautiful brunette in my class and new love sprang up in my heart. Of course I couldn't speak of this love to anyone. I began to realize that somehow, I was different. My whole being cried out to love and be loved. Living with my secret longings through those teen years was so difficult.

I tried being like my friends and began dating young men when my father would allow it. When he wouldn't, I became angry and rebellious. I built a bad reputation for myself and as the small town tongues began wagging, I started withdrawing, antagonistic toward all.

ABUSE

My Christian mother was very patient during those years, but my father was under conviction for not accepting the Lord. His cursing raged out of control nearly every night as he verbally abused my mother. These times sent me into a rage. It was during this time in my life that I decided no man would ever treat me like that.

I also rejected my father for getting mom pregnant again. She was in ill health and she hadn't wanted another child. I had also heard many stories of my father's first wife dying at childbirth and that filled me with fears of having children. No way was that for me.

Then at sixteen, my "steady" boyfriend tried to rape me. That event really confirmed to me that sex was filthy and an abomination.

TWO MARRIAGES

After high school, all my girlfriends were getting married. I became fearful of being left out. In desperation, I gave in to my brother's suggestion to meet one of his friends, twelve years older than myself. In less than three months, I married this man whom I didn't even love. After two years, I divorced him and began writing to a man in the Armed Forces who had loved me before my marriage. The decision to marry him came when I learned he would soon be going to Germany in active combat. I could receive an allotment check and wouldn't have to live with him. What a farce! Less than two years later, he came home and I soon divorced him.

Not long after, the Holy Spirit began to convict me of my sin. I had attended tent meetings in a Pentecostal church when I was a child and marched to the front night after night to get saved. But I'd given it all up when I realized I couldn't be good in the days following.

When I began to feel pangs of guilt, this made Satan angry. Soon after, I was introduced to a lesbian who had been in that lifestyle a long time and knew the ropes. She was a bad influence on me and soon I began drinking, which I had never done. The second night, she invited me to spend the night with her. I began meeting other lesbians and partying far too much. Not long after, I was fired from my job.

I soon met a girl who was my "type" and we lived together for eight years. Because of the guilt and drinking, my fits of jealousy and temper became uncontrollable. Then I left my first friend and began living with another. After a year I nearly killed her in the car after drinking too much wine. Needless to say, she left me for good.

SALVATION

I was home alone the afternoon of October 7, 1955. With fear and panic in my heart, I made the decision to take my own life. I was too ashamed to commit myself to an institution to find help for my troubled mind. Pride was still very much alive, even though I thought I was beyond help. I wondered how to call my friend to ask for her forgiveness. I wanted so much to be forgiven, but it seemed out of the question.

I started for the kitchen to turn on the gas jets. I had already had a few drinks to try to give me courage. Just before I entered the kitchen door, I fell to my knees in front a chair. With tears streaming down my face, I cried out, "God forgive me. God forgive me!'

Only later did I realize that I was saved at that moment. The Holy Spirit came to live within me, and began leading me in ways that confirmed my salvation. But in rebellion, I still held onto my old friends.

I had two lesbian relationships after my salvation. "God doesn't expect me to "quit loving women," I reasoned. Of course, I couldn't stop without supernatural help. And I didn't have anyone else to help. This was years before God raised up former homosexuals to begin ministries.

Ten years after I received Jesus Christ as my Savior, I was still living in sin. God began allowing me to feel the consequences of my rebellion. I could not have survived the trauma that followed without the Lord's care and mercy. God allowed the devil to pour out his wrath in such a devastating way. I still shudder at his trickery. With demonic signs and wonders, Satan convinced me that God wanted me to live with another woman while involved in Christian ministry.

The climax came following the suicidal death of a dear friend whom I had betrayed. It was from that shocking emotional experience that my stubborn will was broken. I promised God that I would not let her death be for nothing. Then came the vision.

THE VISION

While living in what seemed to be a hell on earth with my lover, God came to me one night. I was alone and in deep despair, The Lord gave me a spiritual vision of a worldwide ministry. This outreach would reach homosexuals who wanted a close relationship with Jesus Christ and who wanted to be set free from their sin.

As the vision unfolded, I knew God was saying I must leave this lifestyle forever. I was to begin interceding for Him to raise up individuals from the gay lifestyle and others, truly called by Him, to begin specific ministries to homosexuals.

Six years after the vision, God directed me to write my personal testimony of deliverance from lesbianism. My story entitled "Gay Liberation" was published in book form in 1975. It was the first of its kind and not many bookstores would accept it, due to the subject, which was "hush-hush" at the time.

INTERCESSION

Much has happened since that time. While I continued to intercede, God began calling forth former gays to minister. God has blessed my friendships with many of the "pioneers" in the Exodus movement, such as Frank Worthen, Robbi Kenney, Ed Hurst, and others. I have been blessed also to see many ministries begin in foreign soil. What a wonderful God He is!

God has kept me at a low profile. At times, I have rebelled concerning this. But deep down, I know I was called to intercede for others to be led by the Holy Spirit into the entire world.

Even as I write these words, tears are flowing down my cheeks. Surely God will complete His perfect plan to reach the many millions of the lost who have been so rejected and lonely so many years. I weep for the church, blinded by the enemy so it cannot see the need to teach gays. So many Christians cannot truly believe that God can set these people free. My great desire now is to reach those in the gay church. I am believing God to also work a miracle there. Our God reigns!

Guest Verified #fundie disqus.com

Guest Verified:
So those atheist zealots are shoving their religion down the throats of the rest of us.

infidel1000:
Nope, just want christians to obey the law like everybody else has to. No shoving the bible down the throats of the citizens on government property. The government has no right to tell us who or what or whether to worship. You can indoctrinate anybody in your church or home, but the government belongs to all the people, not just the religious. Think about it, if you can. That protects your religion too.

Guest Verified:
You just posted the tenets of your own faith. Leave everyone else's alone, you zealot.

infidel1000:
I have no "faith". If you have evidence that what I said is wrong, I'd be glad to examine it. Can you say the same?

Guest Verified:
You just expressed faith in having no faith. Thanks for demonstrating your tenets.

Sacchinftw:
Protip: atheism is as much of a religion as bald is a hair color.

Guest Verified:
That's been proven to be an illogical argument. Hair colour has nothing to do with a belief system. Try to stay on topic.

(comment deleted by Christian News Network)

Guest Verified:
An analogy must be accurate or else it ceases to be anything other than a joke. Again, you fail at making an accurate analogy to prove your point. You cannot, because there isn't one. You practice the religion of atheism and you are shoving it down everyone else's throats, just like Nazis did. Sad.

E Hakenson:
Atheism is simply the lack of belief in god. that's it. It's neutral.

Guest Verified:
There is no such thing as a neutral belief system. You're a religious fanatic. Face it.