Similar posts

archaeologist #fundie phpbb88.com

one of the things that makes the atheist argument against faith healing moot is their support for abortion. when a christian does faith healing the athiest is up in arms raising holy hell ready to prosecute the believer and send them to prison in case the child dies BUT when it comes to abortion, very few, if any, athiest rallies against the death of the unborn, do not advocate prosecuting the mother or doctors involved, do not seek imprisonment for those involved in the procedure and so on.

their hypocrisy ruins their opposition to faith healing as they are only against the death of a child if the action is not done their way and approved by them. such people need to remove themselves from any discussion on faith healing for they cannot be honest nor impartial,let alone truthful.

H77b #fundie reddit.com

5 Stages of Inceldom

1 Denial
"I'm not incel! I'm just not great with ladies. Few more weeks at the gym and another self help book and I'll be drowning in poon!"

2 Anger
"These whores need to pay for rejecting me. Chad shouldn't get every woman damn it."

3 Bargaining
"Cmon girls, what if I pay for your dinners and movies, then will you look at me at least?"

4 Depression
Where most of the people in this sub seem to be, contemplating suicide, laying down and rotting, etc

5 Acceptance
The ultimate form of an incel. The final destination. This is when you get Wizard Powers. This is the only way we can end our misery outside of suicide and getting a woman.

TRUECHRISTIAN #racist groups.google.com

Muslim-dogs, or just in an abreviation : muslims.
Have Joy for the moment you can. Our joy will come a little bit later, but I assure you, our joy will be as good as when I heard about Shabra and Shatilla, about when Arafat had to flee Beirut, when you lost the war in 1967, in 1973 and so many occasions before and after, and of course... in the future. You, you muslims are eternal losers : losers to become "martyrs". Only on this point we agree : we will kindly help you to become "martyrs". And .... Who won the Gulf War .... ?
Who will shoot down another Egyptian airliner when it comes to close to the Holy Land, Israel ? These are OUR moments of joy, a joy forever...

Gary Yourofsky #moonbat #crackpot adaptt.org

Sadly, the only glaring difference between the non-herbivore brain and the herbivore counterpart is that the former is incapable of understanding the value of compassionate living. And, YES, I am condemning carnivore/omnivore animals with the aforesaid statement. Herbivores are the ONLY evolved species on the planet. And they suffer more than anyone else because even animal rights activists support the bullying, bloody habits of carnivores and omnivores! If you’re thinking, “But what about the poor lion babies? What would happen if the momma didn’t kill zebras for them?” My response is quite simple: What about the zebra babies? Don’t they have a right to live long lives, and have their mommas alive when they grow up? Wouldn’t it be logical for everyone to get their nutrients directly from plant sources rather than consuming creatures who consumed them first? The Nyanyana crocodile farm in Zimbabwe has proven the validity of the aforesaid claim by converting more than 150,000 crocs to veganism. (Unfortunately, these vile slave-owners aren’t utilizing the vegan diet for ethical reasons as they are murdering the crocs and stealing THEIR skin for the “clothing” industry. But having more than 150,000 stone cold carnivores thrive on a vegan diet proves that veganism is for everybody.)

For the record, I am NOT starting a campaign to stop lions from murdering zebras. I am simply pointing out the insanity of defending victimizers instead of victims, and the hypocrisy of claiming to care about a lion’s murderous choices. First, since herbivores are the victims in this situation, empathy should be reserved for them only. Second, claiming to support lion-on-zebra-killings is disingenuous anyway because if you were hanging out with your dog in the backyard, and he was attacked by a homicidal bear, you would do anything to PREVENT the bear from harming your dog, even if you had to kill the bear! I am kinda curious if people think this hippo was wrong for trying to save a baby impala from a crocodile. Was this zebra misguided for not wanting to be part of this lion’s Death Circle? Were these buffaloes wrong for saving one of their babies from a pride of bloodthirsty carnivores? Was this buffalo wrong for saving his friend from a lion? Should we condemn this bear for saving a drowning crow but then choosing to eat an apple instead? How about the world’s first vegan shark. Should we roll our eyes at her because she doesn’t want to kill anymore? Didn’t this leopard display pure altruism when she protected a baby baboon from a skulking hyena, yet exhibit pure psychosis for killing the momma baboon in the first place? The previous example illustrates how all beings can choose to be rational or irrational. Unfortunately, many beings become psychotic when it’s dinner time. But it is possible for carnivores/omnivores to consciously choose compassion over violence, and still be perfectly healthy. Check out this recent video of a lioness protecting, playing with and THEN DEFENDING a baby wildebeest from another lioness who wants to kill the baby! And check out this story about Little Tyke, a lion who vehemently refused to eat her meals if meat was a part of them, or kill her lamb, chicken, cat and many other animal friends at a sanctuary in Washington in the late 1940s and early '50s.

Dr. Miriam Adahan #fundie jewishpress.com

[Dr. Miriam Adahan claims she cured her bipolar disorder through natural healing methods. This is after she was evaluated and prescribed medication during a psychotic episode.]

Thankfully, this relative [who had brought her to the psychiatrist] took me to a n alternative healer who had helped her in the past. He gave me a shot of vitamins, as well as various supplements to help me calm down. [...] Since then, I have never relapsed, although I still take natural supplements, avoid junk foods and gluten, and make sure to get adequate sleep. I share this in a public forum because Big Pharma and its advertisers have teamed up to convince people that they cannot be sane without psychiatric meds. They minimize the fact that, in addition to the "minor" side-effects, such as dry mouth, stomach upset and loss of libido, these drugs accelerate Alzheimer's, diabetes, Parkinson's, internal bleeding and osteoporosis. True, some people want to be put out of their misery quickly with drugs, but they must be informed of the consequences. If this article gives people hope to heal without drugs, then it is worth facing the ridicule and censure which is bound to come from people who are threatened by the concept of self-healing techniques.

[...]

I realize that many people will be outraged by these suggestions, especially those whose livelihood is threatened by self-healing methods. I have gotten hostile calls from conventional doctors who accuse me of being irresponsible and ignorant, and putting lives at risk by providing alternatives to psych meds. They repeat the refrain, "There are no side effects to psychiatric meds! Medication is the only way to deal with emotional problems." However, I have fifty years of experience which has shown me that people who were functional before a psychotic episode can heal by adopting a disciplined lifestyle, learning to think securely and eat correctly. Teens, in particular, need to learn these skills so that they do not feel like passive victims of their moods, but develop the confidence to help them ride out the emotional storms with positive thoughts and actions.

nobody #fundie stranniki.blogspot.com

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Ruin & Misery

All modern buildings are toxic and ruined
So I'm homeless
I would like to build godly shelters

All manufactured clothing has harmful chemicals
It's so miserable I'm considering wearing rags
I would like to weave healthy clothing

All food is poisoned
So I go hungry often
I wish it were allowable to have good food

All water is contaminated
So I go thirsty and rarely bathe
I'd use good spring water if accessible

More illegal drugs are on fake USA money than others
So I took a vow of poverty years ago
If there was real and clean money I'd use it more

There is no honest or safe work anymore
So I have been unemployed for many years
If I found reasonable work for trade I would

Cities and towns have the most polluted air
So I avoid them, especially the low lying areas
I wander the countryside or mountain wilderness

All worldly government is Antichrist
So it is difficult for me to participate
If it were more peaceful I would accept it more

The same goes for the following, transportation, communication, education, religion, physicians, recycling, etc. etc. etc. basically anything having to do with industrialism.

Lance #wingnut #fundie boards.christogenea.org

Downfall, like any other modern WWII movie, is laced with anti-Nazi propaganda, such as depicting Hitler as a delusional tyrant at the end of the war, or making the nazis out to be heartless evolutionists who didnt care about morality or their own folk.

However, i will say that the movie does do a good job of illustrating the hopelessness of the situation inside the Fuhrerbunker in the final days of the war. Hitler having to put his dog down before taking his own life, Goebbels and his wife having to poison their children...

Watching it, I couldn't help but think about what must have went through Hitler's mind during those final hours, as he contemplated not only his suicide, but the suicides of all those he loved. The ultimate trial of faith.

Imagine experiencing the kingdom of heaven on earth for one sweet, brief decade, only to have it come crashing down on your head like a hellstorm. Hitler held out to the last second, praying Yahweh would work a miracle, but it never came. I understand that it was not time, that only Christ can crush the head of the serpent, but i cant help but relate Downfall to our own lives in the here and now.

Like Hitler, many of us are waiting on Yahweh to act as the walls are closing in around us. Or maybe im just waxing sentimental as i enjoy a good beer while watching it..

If anyone hasn't seen the film, id recommended it...

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: Notice how its always w*men that have suicide *attempts*? they know exactly how many tiktacs to take to get the perfect reaction

image

[In reaction to a post by a girl who got hospitalized after attempting suicide and got surprised by people in superhero costumes to cheer her up]

(richardfromphilly)

Female suicide attempts are such a fucking joke

Every single time it boils down to "waaaah chad rejected me and I only got 1k likes on my latest Instagram selfie"

(AsIs5)

Female suicide is such an offensive joke to real suicide victims. Their childish need for attention is very disrespectful to the men who find no other way outside their misery except ending their lives. Women know how to take any tragedy or event and distort it to make it all about themselves. Literally every suicide related post on “Humans of New York” has girls in the comments shifting the story to focus of their “suicide attempt”

(onlyonewhocouldever)

Apparently she has friends, as well as one dating app away from having hundreds of men chasing her with validation.

Imagine her being an incel for literally 1 week, experiencing crushing loneliness, bullying, hundreds of rejection and 0 people to ever give a fuck or at least be an outlet for your feelings. And worst of all - KNOWING it will only get worse.

(Mayocide_Mozart)

>tehehe, I attempted to end myself now please give me attention, attention, attention!

Females even turn their own "suicide attempt" into a just another opportunity to post selfies and get attention from cucked reddit soyboys.

(BrazilianLambda)

This is such a rage fuel. Female depression/suicide is an attention-seeking charade. Look at that bitch smiling (I assuming the one in the white-blue gown is the "patient"). Next, she will claim that she is cured of depression, and perhaps write a blog on how to overcome depression and/or suicidal thoughts.

Fuck them. Fuck foids, fuck blue-pilled normans. They will never, I repeat, never understand the depth of pain, the abysmal darkness of what constitutes depression of a lonely, unwanted male.

(Trymebish29)

yeah she looks real depressed... JFL. if you want to see depression then look at incel birthday pics.

Karen Davis #moonbat #crackpot #psycho upc-online.org

While I would not dream of using arguments to diminish the horror of the September 11 attack for thousands of people, I would also suggest that the people who died in the attack did not suffer more terrible deaths than animals in slaughterhouses suffer every day. Moreover, the survivors of the September 11 attack and their loved ones have an array of consolations-patriotism, the satisfaction of U.S. retaliation, religious faith, TV ads calling them heroes, etc--that the chickens, whose lives are continuously painful and miserable, including being condemned to live in human-imposed circumstances that are inimical and alien to them as chickens, do not have available. They suffer raw, without the palliatives. Doubtless the majority, if not every single one, of the people who suffered and/or died as a result of the September 11 attack ate, and if they are now alive continue to eat, chickens. It is possible to argue, using (Peter Singer's) utilitarian calculations, that the deaths of thousands of people whose trivial consumer satisfactions included the imposition of fundamental misery and death on hundreds of thousands of chickens reduced the amount of pain and suffering in the world.

In conclusion, I think it is speciesist to think that the September 11 attack on the World Trade Center was a greater tragedy than what millions of chickens endured that day and what they endure every day because they cannot defend themselves against the concerted human appetites arrayed against them. Perhaps the word "tragedy" should not be used anyway in this context unless in the more precise sense of a fundamentally terrible thing happening to a human being who consciously or subconsciously brought the terrible thing upon him or herself, lived through it, and gained insight and wisdom as a result. In this classical sense of tragic drama, it remains to be seen whether America is a "tragic hero" or even a "tragic" victim. If, though, the question is whether the World Trade Center attack was worse for its thousands of human victims than the sum total of misery and terror was for millions of chicken victims that day, I see only one nonspeciesist answer to the question.

Uglyme #psycho incels.co

[Venting] If I had a big family with lots of sisters, I'd rope on Valentines' day


First off: "oH No, tHiS iNkweL Is eNcoUraGinG SuIciDe :soy::soy::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:" Shut up simptears get the fuck out of here!

Alright, I think Valentine's day is perfect for roping especially if I had a big family with sisters, that would ruin their lives forever cause every time they were fucking their boyfriends on that hollyday, they would remember that's the date her subhuman brother died. To make it even harder to swallow, I'd rope in the middle of the living room, so that when they came back from fucking their fucking boyfriends, the first thing they'd see would be the corpse of their ugly brother hanging from the ceiling. Unfortunately, my only family is my mom so that wouldn't have the same effect.
Disclaimer: "don't rope you have so much to live for :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha: :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:"

Cathy #fundie forum.myspace.com

Labels like "victim" imply that the person had no control over the situation. Rape victims, child abuse victims...that is the correct context that the word "victim" should be used in. In this day and age, it's crazy to call women that allow men to beat them "victims". Spineless and a bad judge of character, yes. But don't lump those women in with true victims.

aanarchist #fundie reddit.com

Can suicide be considered MGTOW? Pater familias ended his misery with a straight razor across the neck while seated at the kitchen table with his wife and kids.

ok that's really fucked up. at the same time what a badass to do that shit in front of his own family. it's like looking them in the eye and going all fuck you, death is preferable to slavery.
i'd say that suicide is letting feminism win but in reality the worst possible thing for women and feminism is a reduction in the male population. women's comforts are built upon an abundance of manpower. if you cut down the population of men enough they go through some pretty strifey periods cuz no one's there to provide for them.

Hikikomori #fundie incels.co

Life is barbaric suffering / prolonged torture, for us.

For many of us, our introduction to life out of the womb, was having our genitals mutilated by a surgeon. Then to attend public education that systematically hates boys. Then to realize you're an incel for whatever reason. Then to develop mental problems. Then to work cuckwage jobs until your soul has been murdered. Then to reach NEET/LDAR only to be threatened that if you don't "get back on track" you'll be homeless. Then to contemplate roping. Then to realize you're just as scared of roping, as you are of living.

What in the actual fuck are we supposed to do ? How could this possibly be real ? This entire experience is a wide awake nightmare from HELL. I wish more of us had the resources and the nerve to ERadicate the cause of our suffering. The only thing that brings a smile to my face is the rare occasion when normies get a taste of their own goddamn medicine.

Andrew McCombs #fundie quora.com

Of course if God were truly good and WE were evil, an attempt by God to show us that we were not, in fact, good, would be met the majority of the time with hostility and rebellion.

Yet, since God in orthodox theory IS Good, there are two characteristics which He must embody: that of Justice and that of Mercy. If God were purely to act according to Justice, he has every right to destroy all evil. If, in fact, we are all evil, He has every right to destroy us without mercy.

Yet, God being Good, must also show Mercy. Therefore, it could be argued that if it were shown that in fact we ARE all evil, the more humble of us might see that they very fact that we have continued to exist and flourish DESPITE our evil, is proof that God is merciful, even if at times He has shown His wrath.

Jesus seemed to treat evil not as a wholly deliberate state, but more as a sickness. So… we must ask ourselves this: Is it possible that we ARE evil? If evil is a sickness, isn’t it a good thing that we know our true condition, so that we can seek a physician to heal us of our sickness?

If the Devil IS truly the adversary and destroyer of good, would he want us to know that we were evil? Or would he instead convince us that we were good, and that God was evil for judging us? Evil people rarely ever believe that they are evil. Hitler thought he was the savior of humanity. We all know that evil is highly unpleasant, and how pleasant is it for one who believes he is good to find out that he is, in fact, evil? I would assume it’s just about as pleasant as a seemingly healthy person finding out that they have terminal cancer. If it weren’t for the temporal authority of a medical doctor, we might well think that someone coming up to us and telling us we are going to die was evil for doing so, and we might react towards that person with hostility… not unlike they who believed they were righteous reacted towards Jesus.

Another thing to consider is this: If God created everything, everything is His to do with as he Wills. If, as it says in Genesis, He created everything good, and suddenly evil and death break out in the midst of his good creation, is it not within His perfectly Good authority to eradicate it? Some consider God’s wrath to be proof that God is evil… yet if Evil was destroying His good creation, it would not be God that was evil for destroying evil, but it would be those which were evil who were rebelling against Him, and in doing so, perpetuating the further degradation of His good Creation. Thus, God would still be Good if, by eradicating degrading elements from Creation, He was able to save His Creation.

Many people do not like the idea that they belong to God, and that they are both subject to His justice and at His mercy, but if this adversely affects them, why does that make God evil? If God is Good, and in fact they are evil, they have no basis for criticizing what God does with either them or the rest of His creation, because they seek to do evil and to destroy (whether or not they choose to see it that way).

Furthermore, it is logically inconsistent that God could possibly be evil, since if God were evil, everything that exists as a result of God’s will would also be evil, since there would be no other definition by which to counter an absolute evil source of all things.

Therefore, the claim that God is evil is self-refuting, since claiming evil presumes an absolute measure of good, yet an absolute measure of good implies God, thus proving that God is Good, not Evil.

Thus, to claim any moral superiority to God is also self-refuting, since claiming a moral superiority (especially an absolute one) depends on an absolute definition of Good, which implies the existence of God, the very being one is claiming moral superiority to. It is absolutely absurd to indirectly invoke God’s absolute goodness to directly condemn God’s supposed evil. Yet that is exactly what the argument presented in the post above does.

Whether or not one believes in God, one can use the logic of a hypothetical existence of God to come to the logical conclusion that, if God exists, He must be Good. Any conclusion other than that is either an appeal to emotion, an appeal to ignorance, or an appeal to absurdity.

As to whether humanity is inclined towards good or whether we are inclined towards evil, one only needs to study human history, especially the past 100 years, to come to the conclusion that it is extremely probable that humans are naturally bent towards evil, which is actually much more consistent with the Biblical view than it is with modern humanist views or even most other religious or philosophical views.

That being most likely the case, and since proving moral superiority inevitably rests upon an appeal to absolute transcendent goodness AKA God, could one really say they are in a position to declare that God is evil even in His wrath, when humans have shown themselves to be so utterly incapable of the goodness they hypocritically and hypercritically accuse God of lacking?

I thinketh not.

Madoc #fundie starshipmodeler.net

Folks,

One of the best explanations of the differences in Christianity's handling of Old Testament vs. New Testament was that Jesus marks the difference. It was his arrival and his "dying for your sins" which changed things. It was that assumption of those sins that allowed the New Testament to build on the good things of the Old Testament while setting aside the excesses of the Old.

You also would be very hard pressed to find any denomination of Christians which still practice only the Old Testament ways. Very hard pressed.

Plus, Western Civilization has figured out how to handle religion in the midst of a modern and otherwise secular society. It took a while for it to do so but we've done much better hewing to that "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's" principle. It also helps - a lot - that the main religion of Western Civilization, Christianity, is inherently a hierarchical thing. Thus, there is a central point from which reforms can be applied and adhered to.

Over the centuries this has caused schisms in the faith but, even there, the various Christian sects are also hierarchical. This also has helped to limit the "downsides" of Christianity.

There is not any such thing with Islam. Islam is inherently a non-hierarchical religion. Oh, it has "elders" and experts on interpreting Islamic doctrine and dogma but their authority is purely a voluntary thing. That is, any Muslim is free to adhere or ignore the fatwahs of any particular Islamic cleric.

That means that reform is an exceptionally difficult thing to apply in Islam.

Also, the Islamic world has never gone through its version of Christianity's "Wars of Reformation" which drove home the need for separation of church and state. Thus the secular and sectarian are still very much mixed in the Islamic world as opposed to officially, legally, and culturally separate as they are in the Christian world.

So, when you get some charismatic political leader in the Islamic world he's also able to wield the absolutism that comes with religion. We've learned in the West how nasty that can spin out of control. The Muslim world is continually proving that point.

Anyway, this is why it's an exercise in futility - at the least - to try picking out the nasty things in the Old Testament and attempting to use them to shut down criticisms of Islam. The two are not equal. The Old Testament is not in practice in Christianity - only the New Testament is. In the Islamic world, everything in the Koran is viewed as current and applicable.

As to how nice and un-radical are the Muslims some folks keep referring to - note their locations. The ones who are that way are almost all in the West. And they're here for a reason. Namely, their moderation would get them dead were they still back in the Middle East. And the longer they stay amongst the secular West the more moderate they get. With exceptions, sadly.

So pointing out how nice and un-radical those Western Muslims are is pretty much irrelevant when compared to how things are in the Middle East.

I also gotta say that too many people seem hell bent on ignoring the threat of Islamist jihadis. And they keep doing so on an appallingly regular basis.

Some new horrible Islamist attack is perpetrated by some new band of jihadis and their first reaction is to shrill their sorrow and weep for the slaughtered. This usually takes the form of quickly creating a heart rendering #Hastag to denote their feelings and then also generating some tear inducing image to overlay on their Facebook profile picture.

Within days - in some cases, hours - they'll then crank out the same tired old rationalizations to enable them to run away from actually dealing with the issue.

The latest terror attack by Islamist jihadist fanatics thus somehow becomes OUR fault. The attackers thus somehow become VICTIMS themselves. And we should refrain from using violence in our response as that will only create more terrorists in the future. Oh, and the self-professed Islamist jihadis who perpetrated the attack are not, in fact, Islamists at all.

It's like they're all reading from the same script or something.

This then allows them to blame the West and demand no real long term solution be meted out. And they then merrily go back to their normal lives happy in the knowledge that they are oh-so-morally superior for having such an "enlightened" world view.

Until the next horror rendered out by the next bunch of radical Islamist jihadis.

goydivision #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Based] I sucker punched my oneitis and no consequences

Old story but I decided to share.

I used to be “friends” (read: emotional tampon) for my oneitis because I was a bluepilled faggot.

One day in class she let this other guy sit on her lap. I didn’t take too kindly to that so I sucker punched him so hard his head flew back and smashed her lip against her teeth.

Best part? It’s not LARP and I got away scot free. No consequences, no shame, nothing bad happened except oneitis started hating me. Image is for evidence.

image

WTF

shoot me
I will be departing this world bye
honor suicide

No
WTF MAN
I LITERALLY LET HIM
U CANT DO THAT 0K

I don't like it
0K I DONT FUCKING CARE
THIS IS THE LAST STRAW
U CANT DO THAT
U HURT ME TOO
MY FUCKING LIP IS BUSTED

Good job. Don’t trust whores. Hopefully his face got deformed from your punch

The fucker wasn’t hurt too much but the whore was hurt more than him. So that I’ll say is win. I’ve beaten that guy up in the past, it doesn’t matter if he got away that time, all it matters is that roastie btfo’ed.

That’s good then. I’m actually pretty surprised you got away with it. I’m guessing it’s because you only hit the guy and his head hit the foid meaning you technically didn’t hit her.

yup.

What a weak faggot you are.
He sat on her lap so i hit him in the face because i need attention from her...
You didn’t take what kindly? You wanted to sit on her lap? He took your place? Hmm? You are the bitch of that bitch?
Jfl at this site...

ah yes, Herr Greycel, I am the weak faggot for hitting a stupid bitch.

>jfl at this site
Leave then, greycel

Good.
She would never let you do that.
And the fact that she reacted this way shows that she knew that you liked her.

Beat the bastards beat em now

Hello IT

>51 bluepillers

I’m scared why must they be like this

Nathan "Leucosticte" Larson #fundie incels.co

Not all the suicidal are depressed

People assume that if you're suicidal, that means you're super-depressed. I don't really see it that way.

If you're depressed, it's like the cares of the world are pushing you down. That's what the dictionary definition of "depression" literally is: being pushed down.

If you're suicidal, though, then you've transcended depression. I would argue that if you're contemplating suicide, yet also feeling "depressed" or "melancholy," you might not actually be suicidal. The same force -- viz., the care and concern for your life, the world, your hopes and dreams, etc. -- that would "depress" you would also tend to hold you back from killing yourself, as long as you still hold out what in your eyes is a worthwhile shred of hope.

When you're truly suicidal, you feel freed of all that. You've let it go. That weight is no longer on your back.

What replaces it is a freedom to do whatever you want. You don't even have to try to cope anymore. You can just accept the unpleasant realities, because they'll soon be irrelevant. You can indulge in whatever behavior you feel like engaging in, because what the fuck does it even matter anymore? It doesn't. Even if you suffer consequences, you won't be around much longer to have to deal with those consequences.

Hope is what keeps us going, but it's also a burden, because where there's possibility, there's an obligation to pursue your potential, or else acknowledge that you're a loser by choice, because of your laziness or fear or whatever else you let hold you back. Despair relieves the burden. The black pill, then, can be a force for personal freedom, and the only downside of it is when it's a misguided pessimism that isn't grounded in reality.

When you get burnt out to the point that you say "fuck the world," you know that the world kinda deserves what it's getting by your killing yourself. Yeah, there were cool people who sought to do good in this world, but the people who really gave it their all and truly did what this world needed them to do in order to fix society and uphold the natural law, are a tiny, tiny minority. You saw that it was not enough to save your life from being a miserable hell, in which you reached a point where it became evident that further efforts would be mostly futile, to the point of it being like banging your head against the wall when there's not even anyone around to notice (or when they notice but just laugh at you for it).

You saw that what life had to offer was just never going to rise to your standards, and that it was all because of these douchebags who caused the world to be that way, and all the bystanders who just hung around with their thumbs up their asses instead of taking action to correct the situation, when they could have made the difference; so you said "fuck it".

You also realized that your own powers were to weak to enable you to either make the difference you wanted to make singlehandedly, or to organize a team to make those changes happen. So in the end, you failed the test of life; but in your death, evolution moves forward, so it's a win either way.

Someone was telling me that Lester Burnham from American Beauty was a psychopath. No he wasn't. He just realized the futility of trying to make his situation work. His wife was a hypergamous, emasculating bitch who cheated on him, so the relationship was doomed. He acknowledged this, put her in her place, and sought to replace her with some jailbait. The only thing "wrong" with that was that he was a middle-aged guy instead of a teenage Chad trying to fuck that girl.

You know, I tried to do something similar to what Lester did. I got out of prison and went to the fast food places and was like, "I'm a former accountant who did 46 months of hard time, and I just need ANY job." Okay, I didn't word it that way, but that was the thought running through my head. Anyway, unlike in the movie, I couldn't get hired anywhere, until I falsified my resume to make it seem like my whole work history had involved similar jobs as what I was applying for.

I feel satisfied that I have enough accomplishments under my belt to justify my having existed, sort of. I feel like my hands are tied from doing much more, too, and that if I hung around, in the end I would hit a new low, in terms of living conditions and what I would be subjected to having to see happen, with regard to people I care about but lack much power to try to help. I also have come to the conclusion that my whole family should commit a mass suicide, since their lives are mostly lacking in purpose; but I'm not going to force that on them.

One could say that the whole human race is lacking in purpose, but if it weren't us hanging around and existing and living, then it would be some other species that doesn't have as much capability for introspection. So it may as well be us. Hopefully as time goes on we can evolve further, but there will always be some dissidents who are on the cutting edge of progress, who have to put up with the rest of society's being further behind and holding them back.

By this point, it seems like it should be really obvious that we need to enslave foids, for the good of everyone. But there's a massive propaganda machine that says otherwise, and a lot of social pressure for us to shut our mouths and keep our contrary opinions to ourselves. If we don't shut our own mouths, they'll try to shut them for us, I've found.

People hate the blackpill, because they want to believe that they still have a chance to get what they want in this life. They don't want to face the alternative, suicide or LDARing, and all the drawbacks those choices have. Or if they choose to continue their mainstream life, they don't want to think about the outrages that are being perpetrated against them; they want to believe in a world where they are valued and treated accordingly. Or they think that if they just humble themselves, and live and speak in accordance with the bluepilled dogma, that society will respect them for this and treat them mercifully.

It sure is fun sometimes to fuck up their world of make-believe with the black pill, shattering their illusions like funhouse mirrors, but you know what's going to fuck up their world even more? Seeing you kill yourself. Because then they're gonna be like, "WHYYYYYYYYYY would anyone do that? This world is such a good place, with opportunity for happiness for all! Anyone can get help and learn to be strong enough to overcome adversity; there's no need to be weak like that." Yet, when respected people off themselves, it's like, "Uh oh, now I have to either lose respect for them, or come to terms with what may have made them want to off themselves."

Meanwhile, the blackpilled already know, and suicides are just confirmations of their theory. They see, "Okay, this is a logical person, someone aware of the truth, who weighed the alternatives and decided none were going to work for him to his satisfaction. Sucks that we now have one fewer person like that in the world, but that's the way it goes. The world is harsh to people like that. There will be others, though."

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(psygnosis-owl)

[LifeFuel] Caroline Flack. 40 year old hypergamous roastie (who dated Harry Styles) kills herself. Breaking News.

Before you say "who?". She was a 40 year old celebrity tv presenter and to say her dating list was hypergamous would be an understatement.

She was a denegrate ugly freak who insisted her roster of boyfriends celebrity gangbang fuck buddies be nothing short of Chads almost double her height and half her age.

Good.

Sadly people are empathising with her despite her being a domestic abuser who was given a restraining order by police, after repeating beating her current boyfriend around the head with a lamp. Despite her beaten boyfriend trying to white knight her, the police insisted they stay apart after their apartment was found covered in his blood.

The hypocrisy in male/female suicides or female onto male violence and versa knows no bounds.

(Fat Link)

WTF? Kill herself?? Why???

Oh right it was a foid.

Probably broke a nail or something.

(solblue)

image

This is one of Britain's sexiest women apparently. If a guy dated a 17 year old at 31, his career would be over while hers only blossomed. I wonder what her last miserable thoughts were as she killed herself alone in a flat at 40. Looks like the wall was too much to handle for her

(thenewdrunkdrivers)

She had been charged for assaulting her bf at the end of last year and replaced by some other hole on TV.

This will have been the first hardship this foid will have experienced in her tutorial-mode life and look at the result. If foids somehow tried to experience one day of life as an incel they wouldn't make it through an hour.

(Ignas)

Out of all her 8 exes, why don't I see any manlets, rice, or sub 6 men? What's with all the same hunter eyes, low hairline, and wide jawline?

This comment needs more attention.

For starters they are what you call "Chads", not chadlites or steroid gym rats. High smv, stylish, good genetics proven by hair condition and square hairline, natural height and athleticism = status and access to pussy.

For pure suicide fuel check out Harry Styles.

I know they're chads kek. I'm not a starter. I rankmog and joindatemog you. But yeah it really verifies that women want the same thing and attractiveness in men can be defined with certain features

(LOLI BREEDING)

very nice. hopefully many roasties follow her example she shouldn't get a burial but rather be fed to pigs

(Billowel)

I wouldn't be surprised if she took a few sleeping pills,so that she could be brought to a hospital and later on talk about how much she is *depressed* and how she deserves a smaller sentence.furthermore,she would get a bit more publicity for her *stunt* and gain some 15 minutes of fame.But she swallowed too many pills.

(solblue)

And that is exactly what happened here, the historical revelation that Prince Andrew aged 36 had a fling with Virginia Roberts aged 17 ended his career as a Royal.

The double standards of society is sickening.

I can’t believe I forgot about this situation. It’s absolutely insane how Andrew is made out to be some pedo when 17 is not only legal in the US and UK, but she is also biologically mature at that age. That girl knew very well what she was doing, but she now wants to claim she was manipulated now that she regrets being a whore. The double standards for rosaries is annoying. I hope the Weinstein case goes in favor of the fattie just so feminism can take a hit

Unknown #fundie noman47.wordpress.com

[A Muslim explains why masturbation is bad for you.]

Physical Health: A person who masturbates becomes weak and thin, palpitation increases and his memory becomes weak. The digestive system is impaired and inflammation of the lungs occurs. One may also become anaemic.

Sexual Health: Impotency is the natural outcome of masturbation. A boy who has indulged in the habit of masturbation is not capable of marriage when he grows up. If he does marry, his wife hates him and often husband and wife may divorce. If the woman is pious, she will become depressed and if she is not, she will resort to unlawful acts.

Psychological and Mental Health: A person who masturbates will suffer psychological problems and is liable to mental illnesses like forgetfulness, loss of memory, weak determination, preference for solitude, extreme shyness and fear, being sorrowful and possibly contemplate some serious crime or even suicide.

Some incels #sexist #fundie reddit.com

Re: just call a suicide hotline bro. they’ll help you! []

image

(WailingWhalesInWales)

These seem like well-adjusted people.

Here's a copy paste edit of a comment I recently made:

I honestly believe that ITcels are lower intelligence than average though. Their complete lack of ability to form arguments and use logic is actually outstanding. Whenever you engage with an ITcel, it's like fighting a wild animal. They just foam at the mouth and shit everywhere. Even within their own community they will upvote comments that are blatantly irrational or paradoxical.

When you consider that the majority of ITcels are suffering from mental disorders such as bipolar, schizophrenia, and transgenderism, it makes sense. If you don't believe me, you can see this for yourself by briefly clicking through random users in any IT thread and check out their active communities/brief post history. The most hilarious (and highly prevalent) archetype among them is the soycucks who have outright misogynistic or alt right coping (such as the_donald--a subreddit that blackedsigma has in his active community list) post histories. You can literally see their internal mental battle between hating women and being a whiteknight cuck. These people are not in a stable mindset.

(Anormalregularperson)

They want to live up to their culture’s idealization of the word “good” more than they are able to be curious about what is real. They are more attached to the idea of “good guys” and “bad guys” than they are attached to the desire to know what is true.

That’s why their capacity for logic and reason is very poor, while their will to make fun and shame is very advanced. Lots of them are literally living the truths and realities that are presented here, but because these facts make them uncomfortable or stimulate intense cognitive dissonance within them they just deny it out of pure emotion, cherry picking the most ignorant comments and retreating into the self righteous comfort of feeling morally superior to others.

So many men today are literally involuntary celibate, or are very close to being incel that it is ridiculous....and it’s actually getting worse. The implications of this reality are unacceptable for the gynocentric, women are wonderful status quo. Rather than confront this in a rational way, many men would rather posture to show that they are attractive in some way (think of how common it is for men to fraud or exaggerate, especially online, their moral fashionableness, their height, their partner count, their penis size, how much money they make, ect) to feel good about themselves and like a “good”/“real” man to complete anonymous strangers on the internet.

As long as it makes them feel superior to shame anti-gynocentric thought, that’s exactly what they are going to do. They don’t care at all about what is logical or what is true, they only really care for their own image....the epitome of a feminized mindset and culture.

(doomercel)

IT soyboys are garbage who think they know it all throwing their bluepills out, but tbh, the roasties on IT are some of the most cruellest cunts in existence that definitely do get off on suicide and making men miserable. that's why IT foids come here and mock us.

(FAloner)

They are worse than us. Almost everyone of us wouldn't even harm a fly, meanwhile they talk people into suicide.

And no, inceltears, we're not encouraging suicide amongst ourselves, the rope meme is an expression of despair, helplessness, and understanding.

(TimeToMurder)

good thing I already 100% disregard normy society in every way and if I ever have problems I either deal with it myself or vent to obscure, hated internet subcultures. Would never call some faggot normie on a suicide hotline. Why? Probably just a low IQ douche obsessed with being perceived in a good light and has no real convictions.

(31cabbage)

Please remember, suicide hotlines are made for "lonely" mothers, frustrated family men, attractive teenagers who broke up with their 5th boyfriend etc etc.

They are not made for childless low value unattractive males. There is no guarantee of anonymity, don't make your life worse. Don't let them stamp you with a loony tag and use it against you later on.

(LyricThrowAgay)

See, there's really no reason why incels and their rhetoric should bother them. Accept, they're basically the lowest of the low themselves. So they need to hate you guys to make it through the day.

No different than coping racist in my opinion. Might as well find a way to profit of them.

(interruptor-)

They’d put us in concentration camps if they had a chance. Fuck law fuck morality we only want to kill ugly people who are bitter and got buttfucked by life.

Unironically diabolic people. I would never wish such things (perhaps to some serial killers, but this is not the case).

(redlionred)

hate those weaker than you. be a heartless savage but twist it to make it seem the weak deserve it. same logic is used by western white nations to attack and destroy weaker "so called uncivilized" non-white nations.

(youjustabattlerapper)

The only thing that can generate this type of hate is self loathing

They know they are incel and only by hating incels as viciously as possible can they "maintain" the lie that they are not one

Just smdh

(Carkudo)

That is pretty horrible, but it's a bit more understandable when you see what they're replying to:

https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/ao3lrz/if_she_says_no_scald_her/efypbso/?context=8&depth=9

Yeah dude, if abusing the already flawed mental health system to goad people you don't like into suicide can be "understandable" to you, you're a piece of shit and need to be isolated. You're disgusting.

How the hell do you privileged fucks even grow to be this evil? You get showered with love all your life and yet come out uglier than some criminals.

The Meme Policeman #elitist facebook.com

Many have highlighted the Ayn Rand Institute (and other similar groups) taking PPP funds as hypocrisy. Their thought process goes; Rand opposed welfare, they are getting government assistance, thus hypocrisy. This is a shallow and mistaken view of her philosophy and the reasoning behind taking these funds.
-The ARI didn’t secretly apply for PPP loans, hoping no one would notice. They wrote an article back in May proudly announcing the move, “we *will* take any relief money offered us. We will take it unapologetically, because the principle here is: justice.” So how could taking government money be justice?
-Ayn Rand herself explained in a 1966 essay. She explained the recipient in such a case is morally justified “so long as he regards it as restitution and opposes all forms of welfare-statism.” Those who support such handouts, “have no right to them; those who oppose them have. If this sounds like a paradox, the fault lies in the moral contradictions of welfare statism, not in its victims.”
-Rand recognized that the welfare state (the taking of some people’s money by force to give to another) was wrong. To advocate for or support this was also wrong, but what about those who oppose redistribution but are still stuck in the system? “The victims do not have to add self-inflicted martyrdom to the injury done to them by others; they do not have to let the looters profit doubly, by letting them distribute the money exclusively to the parasites who clamored for it. Whenever the welfare-state laws offer them some small restitution, the victims should take it.”
-Similarly, if someone advocates for private roads, but given the current system there’s only government roads, they are not obligated to refuse to use all roads, that would be absurd. To get taxed for the road and not use it out of some sense of principle would make one unnecessarily suffer. And for what? The same holds for programs like Social Security, Medicare and certain government scholarships and grants.
-As for the PPP funds, the government shut down most of the economy, adversely affecting virtually everyone (including ARI and their donors). They then offered money to virtually everyone to ease the pain. But the government has no money of its own, so essentially it is taking from all to give to all. Money that will likely not be paid for through taxation, but through inflation and deficits, which will effectively take from all productive people in the future. To refuse some of this restitution, so that others who might be indifferent or wholeheartedly support government redistribution can solely benefit, is not standing on principle, but enduring yet another sacrifice.
-Rand lists some other factors to consider in accepting money. One must not compromise their values or views and continue to advocate against the welfare state (the ARI was clear in their article that they would continue to fight for laissez-faire and their efforts wouldn’t be affected). And they shouldn’t take part in providing moral or ideological support for such programs, nor help in enforcing immoral laws.
-Rand admits these are often difficult moral questions. “It is a hard problem, and there are many situations so ambiguous and so complex that no one can determine what is the right course of action. That is one of the evils of welfare statism: its fundamental irrationality and immorality forces men into contradictions where no course of action is right.”
-One major drawback to these stimulus programs is it forces almost everyone into these moral quandaries. Essentially, it’s a free-for-all for government money, should you take yours or simply let everyone else benefit at your expense? There’s no purely virtuous move, but the fault of that lies with the stimulus programs themselves.
-She concludes with this caution in accepting government money, “The ultimate danger in all of these issues is psychological: the danger of letting yourself get bribed, the danger of a gradual, imperceptible, subconscious deterioration leading to compromise, evasion, resignation, submission. In today’s circumstances, a man is morally in the clear only so long as he remains intellectual incorruptible. Ultimately, these problems are a test, a hard test, of your own integrity.”

James Robertson #conspiracy crimesofempire.com

The story is that a lone gunman entered the Reina nightclub in the upscale Ortaköy neighbourhood of Istanbul at around 1.45am on January the 1st and murdered at least 39, wounding a further 69 of the nightclub patrons before changing from the black attire he was wearing when he arrived into an all white outfit and evading all the Turkish security forces making a clean escape from the scene.

...

This event was reported as a real attack around the world but it was not.

The presence of fake victims around an event strongly implies that the event was not authentic because if there were real victims from a real tragedy there would be no need for them.

So while, given the scale of the attack, the wide variety of victims nationalities and the near universal credulity with which the story was greeted make it seem ludicrous at face value to suggest this attack was a work of fiction, a non-event, the weight of currently available evidence points overwhelmingly in that direction.

In many ways it scarcely matters, the more important question is who is behind these events? Who benefits and what are they hoping to achieve?

The militant groups against whom these crimes are attributed gain absolutely nothing. They make their destruction imperative.

Turkey and it’s leader have recently crossed the West, their decision to participate in a Syrian peace process that included Russia and Iran and excluded the US will be seen as an unfriendly act in the US and give the US a motive to destabilise Turkey.

But given that the Istanbul police are handling this case it is hard to imagine any outsiders exerting sufficient influence over the police to pull this event off. It is possible but seems highly unlikely.

On the other hand the high number of foreign victims also seemingly makes it impossible for this deception to have been concocted locally.

Many credible analysts stated that the slaying of the Russian Ambassador in Ankara was a fraud, my understanding is that the assassination was a staged event but the killing of Andrei Karlov was real and perhaps this event will ultimately also turn out to have been authentic and there are signs of authenticity such as what seems to be a corpse laying in the Istanbul street and the start of the attack also appears somewhat authentic, possible spark hits aside.

However the tentative conclusion remains that this event was fiction and the authors were most likely elements within the Turkish state.

Janet bloomfield #fundie judgybitch.com

Drunk chick gets in car with man she doesn’t know to do a line of coke, ends up getting raped.Totally didn’t see that coming!Utterly shocked that Grand Jury won’t indict!The state of rape in the USA.


Every time I write a piece about rape, I think to myself, “okay, that’s it. I am done with this subject”.But then I run across stories like this one and I just can’t…..

http://www.vice.com/read/i-got-raped-then-my-problems-started

Here is the story, quick and dirty:Gina Tron goes to a bar to meet some friends and she gets drunk.Some guy she doesn’t know is there, but she assumes he is with the group.He’s lean and swarthy and has a “disconnected” look in his eyes.He makes her nervous. But then he offers her cocaine, and hey, cocaine!She sets aside all her misgivings, and gets in the car with a guy she doesn’t know, who makes her nervous and who is “disconnected”.

[img]https://i1.wp.com/judgybitch.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2013/07/coke.jpg?resize=300%2C168[/img]

Because cocaine?

What the fuck, Gina. Seriously. What the fuck are you doing?Gina ends up locked in the car with this guy, they drive to his apartment, she goes with him and whatever happened next, Gina considers it rape.She is transfixed by the 666 tattoo across his abdomen, and based on how Gina describes the guy, it’s a complete and utter shock that he would have such a thing, right?

He said, she said. Okay.Whatever Gina.

You know what kills me about this case?That three other women report the same thing happened to them. THREE!There are at least three women who are so unconcerned with their own safety and well-being, they put themselves in the exact same situation.

Parts of Gina’s story are bizarre, too.She went to the guy’s apartment.She knows where he lives.Why does she need to spend hours looking at mug-shots then?So she can ID him and then find out where he lives?She KNOWS where he lives.It makes no sense.

[img]https://i1.wp.com/judgybitch.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2013/07/grand-jury.jpg?resize=286%2C176[/img]

And she claims the defence attorney had incriminating character evidence against her at the Grand Jury trial, except Grand Jury trials don’t have defence attorneys and there is no cross-examination of any kind.The Grand Jury just considers whether there is the tiniest shred of evidence to have the case proceed to trial.In Gina’s case, the answer was nope.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictment

The other two women who were allegedly assaulted by the same man declined to take part in the trial.

Let’s just assume for one moment that Gina is telling the god’s honest truth and the story played out exactly as she said.The commenters at Vice, and at Slate, where Amanda Marcotte (big surprise!) picked up the story use the same analogy over and over again:


Someone’s new car gets stolen, and the police respond that having a nice, new car is just asking for someone to steal it. A man walks down the street in an expensive suit. When he gets robbed, the officer tells him that his outfit was just a come-on for thieves, and, besides, he had been seen giving money away, and how did anyone know for sure that he didn’t give his money to the thief and just change his mind about it later.Dea Henrich

If a man is walking down the street in a $10000 suit wearing a Rolex watch and someone jumps him and robs him, no one ever says it was not robbery because he “wanted it.” They never say it was HIS fault for dressing in a way to indicate he had wealth worth taking. If he is counting hundred dollar bills while walking down the street and gets mugged they don’t say it was not a crime because his actions led the attacker on. Nor do they dredge up things like, he likes to play poker therefore he has a history of willingly losing money. If someone steals a car they don’t declare it’s not stolen because the owner did not defend himself and fight back hard enough.Ethan Wallace

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/07/01/gina_tron_tried_to_put_her_brooklyn_rapist_behind_bars_but_was_abused_by.html?wpisrc=flyouts

Really?Let’s take a look at that, shall we?

[img]https://i1.wp.com/judgybitch.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2013/07/bu.jpg?resize=275%2C183[/img]

Here’s a story from Boston University that is roughly parallel.

A research assistant from the BU Medical Campus was stabbed, punched, and robbed of an iPad by two assailants at 8:32 p.m. Tuesday at the corner of Pleasant Street and Browne Street in Brookline. The victim, a 30-year-old postdoctoral fellow, was treated at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for two superficial stab wounds.

http://www.bu.edu/today/2013/researcher-stabbed-in-brookline-robbery/

Yikes!Stabbed for an iPad.That seems a little harsh.Surely the commenters at the Boston U story are calling for the criminal to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and offering their heartfelt condolences to the victim.

Hmmm

Looks like maybe not.

When you move out of on-campus housing, this is a risk you have to expect. Instead of blaming BU, students should learn not to walk with their iDevices out and their heads buried in them. All of the people that nearly slam into me everyday with their head mashed in their phones become prime targets at night when they walk down dark side-streets that way.Anonymous on 01.30.2013 at 8:00 am

I’m born and raised from Boston (not outside of Boston, the inner city of Boston) and when I hear about these things happening it doesn’t surprise me. Inner city kids know that a lot of wealthy kids go to BU. They know that students have laptops and electronics on them. Automatically you are talented. I grew up surrounded by this mentality.

The point is, all of us students need to be smart and aware of our surroundings. Don’t walk alone at night. Don’t have your cell phone in your hand or out at all. Walk swift and with a purpose. If you see people walking towards you, cross the street. Don’t keep your hood up so you can keep your peripheral vision.

Street smarts people. If you aren’t from a city, start learning them.Local Girl on 01.30.2013 at 5:32 pm

Just because we “shouldn’t have to be afraid” of getting mugged doesn’t mean we shouldn’t take precautions ourselves. You certainly won’t see me walking around with my nose buried in my iPhone or iPad (not that we know that was the case with this robbery, but still). I value those possessions and value my safety, so I can wait to tweet or send that text until I get home. Of course having these things out of sight will not guarantee I don’t get mugged, but it certainly makes me look like less of an easy target.BU Student with Common Sense on 01.30.2013 at 1:51 pm

What, exactly, is it about demonstrating just one iota of common sense that feminists hate so much?What part of “don’t get in a car and do coke with a guy who makes you uneasy and who is completely unknown to you” is unfair or unreasonable to expect?

I think Amanda’s spin on the story is rather revealing:

Women, it turns out, are in a perpetual state of consent unless they bring weapons to bars and are able to wield those weapons against rapists who have made it clear that they are willing to beat you into submission.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/07/01/gina_tron_tried_to_put_her_brooklyn_rapist_behind_bars_but_was_abused_by.html?wpisrc=flyouts#

[

Excellent suggestion, Amanda.Bring a weapon.The one located between your ears is probably the best bet:your BRAIN!!Do you fucking have one?

The Grand Jury refused to indict in this case because it defies the imagination that anyone could be so utterly, implausibly stupid.As soon as your story starts with, “well, I went out with this guy I never met before to do coke in his car”, everything else you have to say loses all credibility.

And apparently, a lot of women who recount their “rapes” to police will often do so in a way that invites police to think they are crazy, stupid, and probably lying.


When Tom Tremblay started working for the police department of Burlington, Vt., 30 years ago, he discovered that many of his fellow cops rarely believed a rape victim. This was true time after time, in dozens of cases. Tremblay could see why they were doubtful once he started interviewing the victims himself. The victims, most of them women, often had trouble recalling an attack or couldn’t give a chronological account of it. Some expressed no emotion. Others smiled or laughed as they described being assaulted.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/06/why_cops_don_t_believe_rape_victims_and_how_brain_science_can_solve_the.html

Rebecca Ruiz, writing at Slate, goes on to explore how neurobiology explains the way women recount their rapes, comparing rape to PTSD or the kinds of trauma torture victims endure.It’s all very compelling information, chock full of fancy medical terms and explanations that sound tickety-boo.Women don’t lie about rape because SCIENCE!

In the past decade, neurobiology has evolved to explain why victims respond in ways that make it seem like they could be lying, even when they’re not. Using imaging technology, scientists can identify which parts of the brain are activated when a person contemplates a traumatic memory such as sexual assault. The brain’s prefrontal cortex—which is key to decision-making and memory—often becomes temporarily impaired. The amygdala, known to encode emotional experiences, begins to dominate, triggering the release of stress hormones and helping to record particular fragments of sensory information. Victims can also experience tonic immobility—a sensation of being frozen in place—or a dissociative state. These types of withdrawal result from extreme fear yet often make it appear as if the victim did not resist the assault.

But there is another explanation for fractured memories and laughter and total lack of credibility:women are not necessarily LYING about the fact they think they were raped, but they are nervous as hell about the fact that they did not take one single reasonable precaution to avoid putting themselves in a dangerous situation. Perhaps the “traumatic memory” they are recalling is just how brainless and idiotic they were in the first place.

Perhaps Tron really WAS raped, and perhaps the jury really did refuse to indict a serial rapist:I don’t live in Brooklyn, but even if I did, it wouldn’t frighten me to know this man was loose in the least.Why not?

I don’t do coke, and I sure as hell would not get in a car with a man I don’t know who makes me nervous.

See how easy that is?I value myself.It’s really that simple.When feminism insists that no woman should ever be required to consider her own safety and her own actions and only rapists should be held responsible for rape, they are essentially asking women to discount their own value.Don’t consider yourself smart, capable, sensible, rational or in any way responsible for yourself.

This is why I don’t understand why any woman would embrace feminism.Feminism doesn’t just hate men, IT HATES WOMEN.What kind of philosophy rests on the assumption that women are incapable of taking the tiniest measures to protect themselves? That it is somehow unfair if women are asked to observe their environments, make a rational assessment of threats, believe themselves capable of avoiding potential harm and deserving of their own protection?RationalCapableDeserving

Perhaps the reason so many women are floundering in their lives and suffering existential angst is because they have bought the story feminism is peddling:women are irrational, incapable and undeserving.Victims.Always victims.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8251259/Women-in-crisis-as-depression-fuels-binge-drinking-and-sex-research.html

The only definite thing Tron is a victim of is her own colossal idiocy.


Don’t take car rides from strangers.Every five year old knows this.How does anyone grow up to think car rides from strangers mixed with drunkenness and some cocaine is a good idea? No one deserves to be assaulted, but holy hell!

When five year olds show more sense than grown women, you know we have a problem.

And the solution is fairly simple:grow up ladies.You can make better choices.Really. Give it a try.Believe you are capable.Believe you are rational.Believe you are deserving.Because you are, no matter what your Daily Feminist Blogger tells you.

And remember, only do coke with people you know!

Lots of love,

JB

Cedric Harmon, Contessa Adams #fundie charismamag.com

Can demons engage in sexual activity with humans?

As bizarre as it sounds, those who minister to people in occult bondage say it's more common than you think.

For nearly two decades, Contessa Adams felt as though she had no power against the demonic violators of her body. She felt trapped in secrecy and shame and knew that the demons tormenting her wanted things to stay that way.

But God had another agenda for Adams when she found Christ in 1979. The former stripper has a ministry through which she exposes one of Satan's darkest secrets—sexual demons.

These spiritual rapists, as Adams describes them in her book, Consequences, often prey on people by performing sexual acts through nightmares and erotic dreams. Some people become so dependent upon these demonic experiences that they actually look forward to them.

"Anybody that has been attacked by them will tell you ... they're worried [that] they could not find that pleasure with mortal people," says Adams, who claims she was once possessed by sexual demons.

The two most identifiable sexual demons are the incubus, which is a male sexual demon that traditionally assaults women, and the succubus, which is a female sexual demon that assaults men. Sometimes they also lure people into homosexual behavior.

Adams notes that one evangelist, whose name she would not divulge, was so troubled by the sexual pleasure the succubus gave her that she even contemplated suicide.

Adams says the succubus spirit that used to attack her confused her so much that she contemplated becoming a lesbian.

"Unless you're strong enough to rebuke it, they'll keep coming back," she says. "You must speak the Word of God, knowing you have power in the name of Jesus."

Margaret Brackett #fundie newberryobserver.com

How to begin the new year with Jesus

What a reliable way to go into 2019 held by the hand of Jesus. He is the wisest of all counselors, the strongest of all defenders, the richest of all benefactors and the nearest of all friends. We can trust an unknown future to a known God.

The New Year can begin a new chapter in our lives. We will discuss how to begin the year with Jesus. The magic of Christmas is remembered when God gave one Gift that is above all other gifts, Jesus Christ. The mystery of a new year remains.

Above all else, there must be a personal relationship with Jesus. A daily association with Him can be shared by prayer, by the sacraments and worship. Thank Him for the gift of life for another day, it is an unearned gift. Thank Him for the hope of heaven and the agony He endured on the cross to save us from endless death.

Sunday is the "crown of the week." The worship of God is not to be conferred when it is convenient. It is our reason for existence; honor it with worship. Stewardship – we own nothing personally. All belongs to God who makes life's gifts possible – a temporary loan. In turn we have a standard of offering back to God part of which He has loaned us – a tithe. The last act of stewardship is your will which should be a bequest to your church, your spiritual home in the world. Holy Scriptures are to be read daily to learn about God's will for us. Jesus first, others next, self – last, brings the only tranquility in a less than tranquil world is for all. The gift of Jesus is for all who receive Him. If we accept the Gift, it is our for eternity. Because God loved the world, He gave His Son to mankind forever. Jesus is a gift that you simply receive and accept Him as Savior and Lord. Through Jesus comes salvation, joy, peace, healing, prosperity, happiness and every other good and perfect gift. Receiving Jesus as Savior will make 2019 your best New Year.

God has given many other gifts. Healing (1 Peter 2:24). The gift of peace (John 14:27) provides peace in the midst of trouble and despair. His promise, He will take care of you and meet your needs. Love – nothing can separate you from God's love (Rom 8:35-39). You also have been given eternal life. There is life after death, and as a Christian you have a promised reward in heaven.

We will be hanging up a new calendar as we celebrate the arrival of the New Year. This is the beginning Jesus as Savior of a new chapter in our lives. Receiving Jesus as Savior will make this your best year. He is the only answer.

You are encouraged today to take the gifts God has given you, unwrap and enjoy them. Make them a part of your life all year round. Prepare for a personal revival during 2019. Ask some basic questions and treat them as a kind of personal inventory of the heart.

Indari #sexist incels.co

Cunt faced pieces of pig shit that spout this shit and think they're clever should be shot in the head and then banned
Half these cunts aren't even suicidal themselves, so they dont know what the fuck they're talking about. Their NT brain cant imagine how depressing seriously contemplating suicide is. Hurr durr if u were really sooisidal ud alredy b ded


Let's see how easily you "pull the trigger" when you not only have to fight against your survival instinct, but you're think about the real life ramifications of your death. Of how it would devastate your family. Let's see how you enjoy feeling like everything you do is pointless when you are thinking of ending it in the not so distant future. They dont give a fuck. They just see suicidal people as entertainment. Fucking edgy shitstains think they look so cool being a callous asshat.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

[Re. the "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" film]

Early in the movie, Harry Potter (played by Daniel Radcliffe) is filmed asking an attractive African girl (Elarica Gallagher) if she'll go out with him after work that night at 11 p.m. Dumbledore then arrives and takes Harry Potter on a quest to see something, thus ruining Harry's date. Dumbledore later tells Potter that he apologies for denying him a night of pleasure. The entire spirit of the scene implies sexual immorality (fornication). This has become the prevalent sinful attitude of the world today, i.e., that it's acceptable to have sex outside of a marriage commitment for the mere sake of sexual gratification. It is wickedness. Harry Potter sends a wrong message to children. Why is there mild sensual content in a series targeted towards children in the first place? There is no talk of marriage or making a lifetime commitment in Harry Potter, Hogwart's students are simply wanting to have sex.

Ann Barnhardt #fundie barnhardt.biz

As I suspected from the very, very beginning, and alluded to in the “When Bad People Get Murdered By Other Bad People…” post, Orlando Jihad Boy was a stone-cold fag.

How did I know? What were my clues?

Well, he was a musloid. So that’s numero uno.

Second, he was Afghani. So, the assumption is that not only was he a fag, but so is his daddy, who probably raped his own son throughout his childhood. Boy rape and adult faggotry is NORMATIVE in Afghani culture. I cover Bacha Bazi (boy sex auctions – as popular in Afghanistan as NFL Football is in the former U.S.) in the video above at length.

So let’s take what we have learned so far about Diabolical Narcissism and tie everything about Orlando together, because only when understood in light of Diabolical Narcissism does any of it make sense – and then it all makes PERFECT sense.

First, islam is the most effective system on earth, even surpassing Communism and the other Marxist milieus, for creating Diabolical Narcissists. Islam, being a satanic political system masquerading as a religion, with the driving force behind it (N.P.I.) being supernatural – that is, satan and the demons – exists to make human beings into DNs. Islam’s primary function is to purge all love from the hearts of those under its jackboot, making them into loveless automatons, mercenaries of hell capable of only anger, hatred, jealousy and fear. Islamic culture is the quintessence of the Alpha-Beta dynamic, with a micro-oligarchy above (imams and recently super-rich oil sheiks), and a MASSIVE Beta underclass below. As a DIRECT COROLLARY, islamic culture is THE MOST SEXUALLY PERVERTED CULTURE on the planet. The men are all fags, pedophiles, goat humpers, dead body humpers, and transvestites. Faggotry is EVERYWHERE. I posted a quote I heard recently: “I’ve never met a gay Arab – but I’ve never met a straight one either.” It’s funny because it’s TRUE.

Just ask anyone who has served a tour of duty anywhere in the musloid world. They will tell you the same thing: THEY’RE ALL FAGS. In Iraq, MPs complained about the number one challenge in the detention facilities being KEEPING THE MALE INMATES OFF OF EACH OTHER. In Afghanistan, our Boys in Uniform are being driven into PTSD and suicide because they are ordered to TURN A BLIND EYE TO CHILD RAPE. How many of our servicemen have walked up on one of their Afghani “allies” ass-raping a little boy, and then been ordered to ignore it, and then just a few minutes later have to “train” and “mentor” the very man they just saw ASS RAPING A LITTLE BOY?

You want to know why these guys come home psycho-spiritually cacked, and eventually blow their own brains out? It’s because of the soul-crushing, despair-inducing scandal of that – not combat trauma.

And this applies to the female population too. Most of the women have had clitorectomies, AND were sexually abused as children. Remember, sexual perversion is derivative of Diabolical Narcissism, so most sex perverts will abuse both sexes if given the chance. So, the females become DN too as a result of the sex abuse, and as will be the topic of an upcoming essay, because women are literally built by God to love, when a woman goes DN, the results are often even more cruel and more vicious than a DN man – which is saying something indeed. Have you noticed how most suicide bombings involve a woman – usually the MOTHER – egging her own child on into committing murder-suicide? Have you not noticed how most of these “honor killings” are egged on, if not explicitly ordered by a woman, again, usually the mother of the victim? Do you realize that it is the mother who holds down the daughter to have her clitoris cut off with a razor blade? Yeah. When women go DN, it is the worst.

So, now to the confusion and hand-wringing over Orlando Jihadfag “killing his own”. Yeah. They all do this. We see the near-daily reports of ISIS and other musloids throwing fags off of buildings and the like. Well, sure. It’s exactly like the Nazis. The high-level Nazis, including Mr. Hitler himself, were all super-pervy fags. They were into drag, boys (what do you think the Hitler Youth was about?) and Hitler himself was into perverse sex acts involving bodily waste. The origins of the Nazi Party and the SA especially, were in the homosexual underworld. If you haven’t read “The Pink Swastika” , do so now.

Fags hate fags. Fags kill fags. What do you expect? As we have already learned, sexual perversion is derivative of Diabolical Narcissism. DNs are capable, by their own free choice, of only anger, hatred, jealousy and fear. As we pinned down in the post about Hell and the Damned, the damned hate each other, most especially those that cooperated, enabled or didn’t warn them about their sin. So, as we discussed, those guilty of sexual sins, if they end up damned, will spend eternity in close proximity to those that they engaged in those sins with, and will hate them for eternally for it.

Look folks, these sodomite sex clubs like Pulse aren’t pubs where people go to hang and and talk. These places exist and are designed to facilitate and enable SODOMITICAL SEX ACTS. Orlando Jihadfag was a regular at this place. He had probably had sex with some of the other sodomites that were there that night. Like I said, it was an image of hell on earth – the damned hating the damned, the people who cooperated in their sin. Anger. Hatred. And Fear. Fear that they could expose him. Of course he hated them and wanted to kill them. Of course ISIS throws fags off of buildings. Of course the Nazis killed Ernst Rohm and the SA on The Night of the Long Knives in ’34, and of course they rounded up fags and sent them to the camps. OF COURSE THEY DID. What else would you expect? What part of “hearts utterly devoid of love” are we not understanding?

Remember, a hallmark trait of DNs, and a pillar of islam, is LYING. Mendacity. In islam it is called “taqiyyah”. Lying is specifically ratified “so long as it is in service to a goal”. Well, isn’t it always? The koran calls “allah” not just a deceiver, but THE BEST AND GREATEST DECEIVER. Over and over and over again. As an aside, whenever any dumbass heretical priest or bishop blasphemes about allah being “the same God we worship”, the fact that the Catholic Church teaches as infallible dogma that God can neither deceive nor be deceived should be rubbed in their faces until they either shut up or repent of their blasphemy. The father of lies is satan.

The reason I bring this up is HYPOCRISY. Yes, this whole dynamic with regards to islam and fags is about as hypocritical as it gets. And hypocrisy is a subset of MENDACITY, or lying, as St. Thomas teaches in the Summa. DNs lie. DNs are hypocrites on a sometimes hard-to-believe scale. Islam is the purest transmission vector on earth of Diabolical Narcissism. And almost 100% of faggots are DNs. Thus, hypocrisy should be expected and anticipated. Being surprised or thrown by it, especially in this context, is just inexcusable at this late stage in the game.

Finally, if you have watched the DN Video, can you determine what kind of Narcissist Orlando Jihadfag was? Somatic or Cerebral?

SOMATIC. Somatic narcissist adult men TAKE SELFIES. And, Orlando Jihadfag was also a user of steroids – CLASSIC somatic narcissist behavior.

Not only is this stuff EASY to understand, it is highly predictable – IF one understands and acknowledges the OVERARCHING GLOBAL PATHOLOGY: DIABOLICAL NARCISSISM, of which islam is THE most perfected transmission vector.

Fuchsia #fundie politix.topix.com

[In Response to a report that almost half of black gay teenagers have contemplated suicide.]

This is sad, and totally unnecessary. It is sad that living a gay lifestyle is more important to them than being alive. If you want to reduce suicide, promote asexualism as a viable and healthy alternative and teach all children to keep their sexuality to themselves until they are 18. First, you do not have to choose gay behavior nor act on gay impulses. If you cannot control your behavior and passions, then maybe evolution should take you out. And even if you choose this lifestyle, then you should keep it to yourself and never mention it. You cannot be attacked over something others don't know about you. If I was different in some way, I'd do whatever it takes to keep that to myself so there won't be consequences from others. If I were to advertise my difference and wear it on my sleeve, I'd be asking for whatever mistreatment I get.

Triweekly Antifeminist #fundie triweeklyantifeminist.wordpress.com

The esteemed commentator Chinzork wrote:

For one of the first posts on this blog, I think you should debunk all of the common talking points against abolishing the AOC. The talking points get repetitive after a while, so an article debunking all of them sounds good.

Alright then, you got it. Herein is a compilation of the 15 most popular Blue Knight arguments, each argument followed by a thorough dissection thereof.

#1: Teenagers only become sexually mature after completing puberty around 16.

This is a wholly metaphysical proposition; a statement of belief. The Blue Knight starts out from the premise that a “completion of puberty” is a prerequisite for this nebulous state known as “sexual maturity,” then makes the circular argument that, because a 13-year-old has not yet completed puberty, he or she are thus sexually immature. “Sexual maturity” is an altogether arbitrary concept, and there isn’t any way to measure it or test it.

The Blue Knight makes it seem like he or she has objectively examined the issue and reached the conclusion that the age of “sexual maturity” just so happens to start when puberty is over; but there has not actually been any such objective examination of the issue – it simply has been assumed (axiomatically) that this is the case, and the whole “argument” proceeds from this unproven, arbitrary, and essentially metaphysical assumption.

The Blue Knight argument posits that 1) without “sexual maturity” sex is harmful and as such should be illegal; 2) a full completion of puberty is a prerequisite for “sexual maturity.” You may well give the following counter-argument, accepting — for the sake of discussion — the former premise, while rejecting the latter, and say thus: “children become sexually mature after completing adrenarche around the age of 9.”

Fundamentally, however, I have seen no evidence whatsoever that a “sexually immature” person is necessarily harmed (or victimized) by sexual relations merely due to being, according to whatever arbitrary definitions one uses, a “sexually immature” person. I suspect that, as a matter of fact, “sexually immature” people often enjoy sex and benefit from it even more than the so-called “sexually mature” folks. And again, the very distinction between “mature” and “immature” is altogether metaphysical in this regard, like the distinction between “pure” and “impure” or “holy” and “unholy.” It is hocus pocus; theology not-so-cleverly disguised as biology.

According to Blue Knight “morality,” an extremely fertile 15-year-old female should be prevented from sex (because “sexually immature”), while a 55-year-old female who has no ovaries left should be free do get fucked however she likes. It is very clear that such a “morality” is really an anti-morality; it is against what is biologically natural, it is against human nature specifically, it is degenerate, and it is detrimental to the interests of civilization and the TFR.

#2: The Age of Consent protects young people from doing things (sex) which they don’t really want to do.

I have seen no evidence that young people “do not really want” to have sex. On the contrary, I have seen, and keep seeing, that young people greatly desire to engage in sexual activities. That is why they engage in them. If 11-year-old Lucy is a horny little slut who enjoys giving blowjobs to all the boys in the neighborhood (many such cases), the Age of Consent does not protect her from something which she is reluctant about doing; it prevents her — by deterring men from approaching her — from doing something which she does in fact desire to do.

The Age of Consent is simply not needed. Think for a moment about young people. Do you not realize that they are just as eccentric, and can be just as wild, as older people? Why is it that when a 19-year-old chick randomly decides to have an orgy with 3 classmates after school, that is okay; but when a 12-year-old chick likewise randomly decides to do just that, oh noes, she is a “victim” of a horrible crime? We accept that each person is unique, independently of age; and we realize that there are children –not to mention young adults — who are very much into X while others are very much into Y. Why, then, should it be so “shocking” when it turns out that some children, and plenty of young teenagers, are very much into sex? Being interested in sex is arguably one of the most natural things there are, on par with being interested in food; certainly it is more natural than being interested in physics and chemistry and mathematics, right? If we accept the existence of child prodigies, children who are naturally driven to pursue all kinds of weird and special callings, why can’t we accept that there are indeed lots of children who pursue the very natural thing which is called “sex”?

Young teenagers have extremely high sex-drives, and the idea that they “do not really want sex” is contradicted every single moment. This is all the more remarkable given that we are living in a puritanical, prudish, sex-hostile, joy-killing, pedo-hysterical, infantilizing society; yet teenagers manage to overcome this intense anti-natural social programming, and do what nature commands them to do. “Child innocence” is a self-perpetuating myth, which society shoves down the throats of everyone all the time since age 0, and then uses this self-perpetuating myth which has been forcefully injected into society’s bloodstream to argue that “oh gee, young people just don’t really want to have sex.”

The entire entertainment establishment is concomitantly brainwashing children to remain in a state of arrested development aka infantilization, while conditioning the consumers of this “entertainment” to only find old women attractive. That’s one reason why I believe that we must create Male Sexualist aesthetics – we must reverse the brainwashing done to us by the entertainment complex. The television box is deliberately hiding from you the beauty and the passion of young teenage women, and is actively engineering your mind to only find older women attractive. And yet, despite there being a conspiracy by the entire society to stifle young sexuality, young sexuality lives on and thrives. Well, not really “thrives” — young sex is in decline, which conservative total dipshits blame on pornography rather than pointing the finger at themselves for propagating a climate that is extremely hostile to young sexuality — but it still goes on, to the consternation of all Puritans and Feminists everywhere.

Blue Knights claim that young teenagers are “peer-pressured into sex.” This assumes that your average teenager is asexual or close to being asexual, and thus would only engage in sexual activities if manipulated into it by his or her environment. The reality, meanwhile, is that those 12-year-old sluts who have orgies after school time (or during school time) are often as horny as a 16-year-old male. They are not being pressured into sex – they are being sexually restrained by a society that is terrified of young sexuality.

#3: Young people who have sex grow up to regret it.

First of all, when the whole of society is determined to portray young sex as a horrid thing, it is no wonder that people — especially women, who possess a herd mentality — arrive at the conclusion that they’ve been harmed by it. If young sexuality were presented in a positive light by the media-entertainment-state bureaucracy-academia complex, people would be more inclined to remember it fondly than regretfully.

The second thing is that it doesn’t even matter. People feel regret about doing all kinds of things – so what? Does that mean that for each and every case of such “regret,” society needs to go on a witch-hunt for “victimizers” in order to inflict punishments upon them? It’s time to grow the fuck up and accept the fact that people sometimes do things which later on they regret doing, and that this is an integral part of life, and that the state has no business protecting the civilians from “bad feelings.” That’s literally what this Blue Knight argument boils down to – “the state should punish men because women experience negative feelings due to their own behavior.” No, women should learn to deal with their bad fee-fees without demanding the state to find “abusers” to penalize. We are living in a totalitarian emotocracy (rule by emotions) and I’m sick of it.

Also: what is the difference between feeling regret about fucking at 13 and feeling regret about fucking at 17? Women generally feel bad about promiscuous sex (hence the phenomenon of “regret rape” false accusations), and they feel it at the age of 21 as much as at the age of 11; actually, older women may be even more regretful than young ones about sexual activity, because they’v been longer exposed to Puritan-Feminist brainwashing, and because their biological clock ticks much faster. So, according to the victimization-based morality of Blue Knights, men who sleep with 23-year-olds should also be punished. Again, the Blue Knights want men imprisoned solely due to some vague negative fee-fees felt by some women. This is emotocracy in action. No wonder that testosterone and sperm counts are in sharp decline – society is ruled by catladies, and is structured according to catlady morality.

The state simply should not protect people from the consequences of their own behavior – and here “protect” means “punish men,” and “consequences” means “vague negative fee-fees.” Our society is severely infantilized by the victimization-based morality, and infantilization is degenerate.

#4: Young sexual activity is correlated with many bad things.

That may or may not be so, but what are the implications? Generally, people who are natural risk-takers will do all kinds of things, some of which may be positive, others negative, and still others just neutral. The conservadaddy making the “correlated with bad things” argument implies that punishing men (and women) for young sex would somehow reduce those negative things supposedly correlated with young sex. That, of course, is bullshit. If a risk-taking 12-year-old decides to have an orgy with her classmates, she will remain just as much of a risk-taker whether or not her classmates or other people are punished. Depriving her of the opportunity to take “sexual risks” won’t diminish whatever other risk-taking behaviors she is prone to.

The thing about Blue Knight arguments is that they aren’t arguments at all. There is no logic in stating “young sex is correlated with X, and X is bad” and then using that to support the criminalization of young sex. This is the same logic used by pedagogues to justify pedagoguery, only in reverse: the pedagogues argue that education is correlated with intelligence (as measured by IQ tests), then use that claim to imply that education makes people smarter, and therefore everyone should undergo education. This is a wholly fallacious argument. At the risk of sounding like a spergtastic redditor goon – correlation does not imply causation. The Blue Knight argument is not an argument at all. It’s plainly illogical.

By the way, I’d say that there are plenty of negative things correlated with young sexlessness – such as growing up to be a school shooter, for instance. You’ll never hear Blue Knights discussing that.

#5: Some Statutory Rape legislation allows teenagers to have sex among themselves, and only prohibits older people from predating upon them.

This argument typifies what I call the “victimization-based morality” aka “victimology.” The people making it assume — against all the available evidence — that within any relationship between a young person and an old person, the former is necessarily victimized by the latter.

The individuals making this argument (usually you’ll hear it from women) will often tell you that it is “creepy” for older men to be interested in young women. They will pretend that young women are exclusively attracted to young men, when in reality they are attracted to men of all ages – to men as old as their father as well as to their classmates. My own life experience confirms this, as I personally, in-real-life, know of women who fucked significantly older men when they were aged 14-15. It was all passionate and voluntary and enthusiastic, believe me. And the many accounts you can find on the internet leave no doubt that it’s common for young women, pubescent and even prepubescent, to be sexually attracted to significantly older men.

It is important to stress the point that the women themselves pursue and desire those sexual relationships, because the Blue Knights have created the false impression that the entire argument for abolishing the AOC rests on our attraction to young women, an attraction which according to the Blue Knights is completely unreciprocated; whereas in reality, it is incredibly common for young women to initiate sexual relationships with men as old as their father. It takes two to tango – and the tango is quite lively indeed. Given the sexual dynamics elucidated by Heartiste, wherein women are sexually attracted to “Alphas,” it makes perfect sense that young women would be sexually attracted to older men even more-so than they are sexually attracted to their peers, since older men possess a higher social status than young ones, relatively speaking. Again, life experience confirms this.

Thus, there is no sense in punishing old men who fuck young women, unless, that is, one embraces the whole “taken advantage of” argument, an argument which relies on a denial of the biological and empirical reality on the ground, and simply defines (as an axiom) all relationships in which there is a “power imbalance” as “exploitative.” That is, there is no evidence that any “exploitation” is taking place in such relationships, and Blue Knights assume its existence because they refuse to believe that young women can be horny for older men.

Also, the Blue Knights will bring up argument #1 to “substantiate” argument #5, and argue that due to the “sexual immaturity” of the younger party, the older party must be forbidden from being in a sexual relationship with it altogether – because otherwise there may be “exploitation.” Again, the moment you realize that a 12-year-old female can be as horny as a 16-year-old male (who are, needless to say, extremely horny), the idea that the slut is prone to be “sexually exploited” by a sexual relationship with a man who is statistically likely to be high-status (and thus naturally sexually attractive to her) become absurd. And as we’ve seen, the whole “sexually immature” line is ridiculous – it has never been shown that maturity, for whatever it’s even worth, is reached at 16. In saner, de-infantilized times, 12-year-olds were considered to be mature, were treated as such, and evidently were mature. Hence my saying: “child (and teen) innocence is a self-perpetuating myth.”

#6: You only support abolishing the AOC because you’re a pervert.

A common ad hominem. Now, it is expected that possession of a naturally high sex-drive would be correlated with sexual realism (i.e. being woke about the reality of sex), because a high sex-drive individual would be much likelier than a low sex-drive individual to spend hours upon hours thinking about the subject of sex in its various and manifold aspects. But that only goes to prove that it is us, the “perverts,” who were right all along about sex – and not the catladies and the asexuals who haven’t ever thought about sex in realistic terms because they never had any incentive to do so. Our “bias” is a strength, not a weakness.

There really isn’t anything else to add here. When they accuse you of being a pervert, just agree & amplify humorously: “oh yeah, I jerk off 8 times each and every morning before getting out of bed – problem, puritan?”

#7: You only support abolishing the AOC because you are unattractive and trying to broaden your options.

Also known as “projection.” Well, actually, there also are men who make this argument and not just dried-out wrinkly femihags, so let’s address it as if a man said it. Again, this is an ad hominem that presupposes that your motivation to engage in sexual politics of the Male Sexualist variety is merely your desire to improve your personal situation in life. Now, even if it were true, that 1) wouldn’t matter, because what matters is the arguments made and not the ostensible motivation behind them; 2) there is nothing essentially wrong with trying to improve one’s situation in life – and “there are no rules in war and love.”

By the way, abolishing the AOC, by itself, is not going to get all of the incels laid over-night. There are other measures that must and will be taken to ensure sexual contentment for all of society. Abolishing the AOC is a crucial part of the program, but it’s not the single purpose of Male Sexualism, in my view. What I personally would like to see in society is maximal sexual satisfaction for everyone. There are many ways to try reaching that point.

Anyway, the point is that “you are motivated by a desire to increase your options” is not even true regarding most of the prominent Male Sexualists. Presumably. I won’t speak for anyone else, but I’m married, and very satisfied with my great wife.

14376_7
Big Beautiful Women are not for everyone, but I’m cool with it. In this scene from the Israeli film “Tikkun,” my wife — who is an actress — plays a prostitute. Sorry, Nathan Larson, I’m not sending you her nudes; this one should suffice.
As a matter of fact, as I wrote in one of the last posts on DAF, my own kind of activism would not be mentally possible for me if I were not sexually satisfied. I’m not driven by a personal sexual frustration; on the contrary, as I keep saying, what drives me is essentially a spiritual impulse, which has awoken to the extent it has as a result of getting laid.

#8: If you support the abolition of the AOC, it’s because you’re a libertine who believes in “everything goes.”

Some Male Sexualists are, unmistakably, libertines – and proud if it. However, others are faithful Muslims. The notion that opposition to the AOC must necessarily be tied to libertinism is nonsense. Look at traditional European societies 350-300 years ago – almost none had an AOC at all, yet they were hardly “libertines.”

This Blue Knight line is somewhat related to the “LGBTP” meme – they think that we are Progressives trying to advocate for pedophilia as part of a Progressive worldview. I think that it’s safe to say that no one in Male Sexualism belongs to the Progressive camp, which is the camp where Feminists and SJWs reside. That said, some versions of libertinism (sexual libertarianism?) aren’t so bad, anyway. As TheAntifeminist said in a comment at Holocaust21:

[M]y utopia as a male sexualist would be somewhere like 1970’s Sweden or Holland.

This is a legitimate view within the movement.

#9: If young people are allowed to have sex, their innocence will be ruined; sex is exclusively for adults.

Here we see the Enlightenment-spawned Romantic idealization of “childhood” as a period that, due to whatever values one attaches to it, must be preserved against encroachment and incursion from the “fallen world of adults.” This is the Romantic basis of modern-day infantilism.

It used to be understood that the purpose of “childhood” is growing up into adulthood. The so-callef ‘child’ should be made into an adult, should be given adult tasks, adult responsibilities, and — all the sooner — adult rights. Today, society does just the opposite, and infantilizes people with a historically unparalleled intensity. That’s the result of elevating “childhood” into an ideal form. No wonder that now, it’s not just teenagers who are called “children,” but people in their 20s. That’s the process of infantilization which society goes through.

As usual, conservative dipshits, addicted to their own Romantic conceptions, claim that “actually, children are not nearly infantile enough these days.” They don’t see the pervasive “kid culture” that has completely zombified kids into being basically a bunch of drooling retards; no, what the prudish-types care about is “MOAR INNOCENCE,” as usual.

Fact is, kids today are not shown anything about the real world; a whole culture of idiocy, blindness, silliness, and clownishness has been erected like walls all around them. It is the culture of the TV channels for kids, the culture of Toy-Shops, the culture of child-oriented video games. Muh “birds and bees.”

Look, I get the temptation to indulge in infantilism. In fact, I’m probably a hypocrite, because I haven’t yet begun doing anything to de-infantilize my own 19-month-old son. He, like most toddlers, also watches the stupid TV shows and has all of these damn toys all over the place. It’s not easy resisting the ways of the system. But the real problem is that society is not structured in a way that allows children to be de-infantilized. When people only get a job at 18 or at 21 or they are NEETs, and there is an age-ist Prussian School System that is mandatory and which brainwashes its prisoners to believe that “school is good,” and Feminist careerism is pushed on all potential mothers by the media-entertainment-state bureaucracy-academia complex, it’s no wonder that people are very immature nowadays. That only goes to show how radically modern society must be transformed, in my opinion.

To get back on point: “childhood” and “adulthood” are both fictional concepts. These may be useful fictions, but they are still fictions. The telos of childhood is adulthood. It’s a transitional state, and if we must choose an arbitrary age when childhood should be officially and finally over, that age should be 9. That is, if we discover that 10-year-olds behave in an infantile manner nowadays, it’s because their parents — and, crucially, society at large — have not properly de-infantilized them. It’s a wholly artificial state of affairs, rooted in Romantic delusions.

Young people should have sex, because young people should experience real life in order to become functional adults; and an integral part of real life is — and should be — the sex life. Far from constituting a “problem” for young people, sexual intercourse is one effective way for getting young people to see the broader picture of reality. Deprived of sex, ‘kids’ grow up with warped and unrealistic notions about reality, and suffer dysfunction as adults. They don’t get to learn what’s important and what’s unimportant in life when they should learn it – young. Getting laid gives you a mentally clear vision of priorities in life, gives you a clarity of mind which allows you to deeply reflect on what’s actually going on in the world. Sex is necessary for young people, whose one and only task is to — repeat after me — become adults. Sex is a fundamental part of a fulfilled adult life.

#10: Young sex leaves young people traumatized.

No, it doesn’t. The ‘trauma’ stems entirely from being repeatedly and incessantly told by Blue Knights (Puritans, Feminists, Conservadaddies, Catladies, etc.) that a horrible crime has been committed against you by a wicked individual, that you have been “taken advantage of,” “deprived of innocence,” “ruined forever,” “sexually exploited,” “abused,” and the rest of the victimological jargon. The sex itself and the relationship itself feel good, and are indeed good biologically and psychologically; they bring fulfillment to one’s life and a satisfaction for one’s fresh and burning biological needs. The whole “trauma,” such as it is, is inflicted by society on the younger party, due to society’s strict adherence to a victimization-based morality.

That’s why I call for a Moral Revolution. This is not a troll. As long as people adhere to a victimization-based morality that sees “power imbalances” as inherently and fundamentally victimizing, people won’t be able to think logically about young sexuality. The current prevailing system of social morality must be replaced with a new one. Once that is achieved, all of this “trauma” — which is inflicted by the Blue Knights on horny young people — will dissipate and evaporate altogether

Young people greatly enjoy sex, and will go to great lengths to achieve it, overcoming the very many mechanisms of sexual oppression established by Blue Knights.

#11: Young people don’t know what’s good for them, and therefore need to be protected from risky situations.

If young people don’t know what’s good for them, it’s because society itself has successfully destroyed their ability to know what’s good for them. I mean, by the age of 10, a person should have a basic idea about what life is all about. If that’s not so for most or all people, something is deeply rotten in society.

And the reason for this indeed being the modern state of affairs is exactly because the protectiveness of parents, combined with wholesale cultural infantilization, has rendered young people incapable of independent thought. Thus, instead of “MOAR PROTECTION,” young people need infinitely less of it – so that they will learn to deal with reality.

And at any rate, sex is not as risky as the Blue Knights claim it is. They scare people about STDs, but then the solutions to that problem are well-known, and are completely independent of age – if instructed properly, and possessing a responsible personality, a 10-year-old can behave just as carefully — if not much more carefully — than many 40-year-olds.

Then there is the issue of pregnancy. First of all, what I wrote in the above paragraph about responsiblity applies here as well – the pregnancy-avoidance methods are well known. Secondly however, there’s a great differences in here: pregnancy is not a disease. It’s not a bad thing, but a good thing. I support young pregnancy and young parenthood. That is the primary “risk” which Blue Knight scare-mongers warn about, and I don’t see it as a risk at all. Instead of being protected from reproduction, people need to be instructed about how to reproduce. I once wrote, trollishly as usual, that if there should be any schools at all, then the “homework” of young females should be getting impregnated. The essence beneath the statement is on-point: pregnancy is good, because reproduction is good; fertility is good, while sterility is bad.

So, in my view, young people should not be protected from the “risk” of pregnancy. They should be instructed about it, made to comprehend the how’s and why’s of it, and then allowed to use their mind-faculties to figure-out what should or should not be done. That’s the gist of any de-infantilization program.

#12: Young people don’t desire to have sex.

Young people do, as a matter of actual fact, very much desire to have sex; much more-so, even, than many old people.

#13: If the AOC is abolished, parents will no longer be able to control their children.

What is the purpose — the very raison d’etre — of parental control over children? To turn children into functional adults, so as to allow them to form families and continue the bloodline. This cannot be achieved by hindering the ability of children (or “children”) to engage in the one thing that marks the arrival of maturity – sexual activity. Sexual activity is the thing that most unequivocally transforms an un-developed person into a developed person. Since the purpose of parenthood is the creation of adults, parenthood should serve to (at the very least) give-way in face of the natural maturation of children, rather than artificially prolonging “childhood” in order to extend the period of parental control. Parental control is only good insofar as it allows parents to facilitate the de-infantilization of their children; when, as in our deplorable times, parental control is used to exacerbate the infantilization of children, it is in the interest of society to tell parents to fuck off.

Since parents these days abuse their parental power and authority by artificially prolonging the infantilization of their own children, the abolition of the anti-natural AOC is exactly a thing that is needed in order to put parental control in check. The power of parents vis-a-vis their children must be drastically reduced when the child reaches the age of 8. That’s usually the age when sex, reproduction, and marriage all become relevant. If you want to argue that 8 is still too young, perhaps (maybe) we can compromise on 10. Point is, between 8 and 10, parental power should be dramatically restricted.

As a 23-year-old father, I can tell you that parents and family in general continue to significantly shape your life long after you cease being under “parental control.” An abolition of the AOC won’t result in all teenagers running away from home never to be seen again. But it will, God willing, result in the establishment of many new young households. That is something that we should strive for – getting teenagers to form families. That is the meaning of creating adults.

#14: Without an AOC, there will be grey-zone situations of child prostitution.

Child prostitution should be legal.

#15: Abolishing the AOC will increase pre-marital sex, which is a bad thing.

First of all, I couldn’t care less about whether or not sex is “pre-marital.” I had fucked my wife and impregnated her before we were married; so what? What matters is the bottom line: the creation of a patriarchal and stable household.

The second thing is, people today marry extremely late, and many forgo marriage altogether. This is related to the war against young sexuality: not reproducing when young, people struggle to reproduce when old; and living in sexlessness until the late teens or early twenies (or until later than that), a total sexual dysfunction takes over society, and people find it difficult to form long-lasting relationships at all. Young love shines the brightest, the younger the love, the brighter it shines; couples who start young last longer than those who start old.

Puritanical Blue Knights have brought about the plummeting of the TFR in Western Society. In my view, pre-marital sex should be accepted, as long as everyone involved understands that the purpose of any “romance” is the formation of a household. Early teenage marriage should be encouraged, and if early teenage sexual intercourse facilitates that, so be it – it’s all the better. It is not sex that is harmful to young people; sex is good for them. It is sexlessness that is the central and overarching problem of our times.

In conclusion
Man, that was exhausting, I gotta say. But hopefully, this post will serve as a guide to answering Blue Knight talking points. All of you must remember this: before you can annihilate Blue Knightism, you must mentally internalize what it is that we Male Sexualists believe in. In moments of uncertainty and doubt, consult this post, and you may find the core idea needed for you in order to formulate your own Male Sexualist position about any given issue.

There is a new revolution on the horizon. I don’t know how long I personally have left in this world. Perhaps the intelligence operatives threatening me will decide against killing me, or maybe they’ll slay me this very night. Who knows. What I want you to do is to take the ideas provided on DAF and now on TAF, understand them, and spread them. This is not a cult of personality or a money-making scheme. This is a political movement that has its own ideas, ideas that may initially appear groundbreaking but which in reality may also be primordial, ideas which we hope will be implemented in reality – be it 30, 80, or 360 years from now. At some point in the future, somewhere on the face of our planet, there will be a Male Sexualist country.

If during the next half-decade we manage to bring into the fold both edgy 4channers and 8channers (“meme lords”), and serious, intelligent, competent, affluent, deep-thinking, and strategizing supporters, we will be able within several decades to achieve our political objective.

MarilynA #fundie wnd.com

The one thing that all those boys who were molested by homosexual Catholic priests have in common is that every last one of them had contemplated suicide because they thought that having participated in a homosexual activity, it meant they were homosexuals and most of them would rather be dead than be like that. The high rate of suicide among homosexual youths has been cited as the need for promoting acceptance of homosexuality in our public schools. If I am right, and the high rate of suicides is caused by this misconception by confused adolescents, then, aren't those promoters of acceptance of more open sex with children, actually advocating putting more and more of our youths at risk? Nobody has ever questioned the "facts" put forth in the gay activist's agenda. Isn't it time someone checked this out and blew the whistle on it?

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

According to an account written by the drunken, cigar-chomping, terrorist scum-pig, Winston Churchill, it was during the 1943 Tehran Conference that "Uncle Joe" Stalin proposed executing 50,000 German staff officers after the war. American Gangster President Roosevelt then joked that 50,000 was too many; but that 49,000 would do! Though Churchill claims that the sick joking upset him (sure it did, Winnie -- sure it did), the murderous Allies were all in agreement that "trials" of Germany’s top leaders would take place after the war. And indeed they did.

Long before Nuremberg, the vicious Allies had already begun to systematically hang "Nazis" by the tens of thousands, including "female Nazis."

When the show trials began in late 1945, an 8-panel tribunal (The Nuremberg Trials) was seated (2 judges each from the US, UK, USSR, & France). The primary American judge was Francis Biddle, of the Biddle Family that spawned the 19th century American Central Bank Chairman and nemesis of Andrew Jackson, Nicholas Biddle. Honorable German leaders were condemned as “war criminals” by governments that not only imposed the war upon Germany, but also carried out the Hamburg, Dresden and Tokyo fire-bombings, the sinkings of the civilian Wilhelm Gustloff & the Goya ships in the frigid Baltic Sea, the forced return of Russian refugees & POWs to Stalin's vengeful henchmen, the starvation / disease murders of 1.5 million German POWs, the execution murders at Katyn Forest, the mass raping of German women, the dropping of atomic bombs and other real war crimes too numerous to list here.

Of the accused at Nuremberg, 11 were sentenced to hang, and 7 (including the peacemaking parachutist Rudolf Hess) received long or life prison terms. Herman Goering, Head of the Luftwaffe (Air Force) managed to cheat his executioners by taking poison in his jail cell (or was he "suicided" to duplicate The Book of Ester / Purim scenario?)

These were good men; noble men; peace-loving family men - ignobly murdered in cold blood for daring to protect Germany from the demonic henchmen of The New World Order crime syndicate. May they rest in Valhalla at the right hand of the even greater hero that they served.

Purim-style "justice." In the sickening Book of Ester (Old Testament), the lifeless bodies of the 10 sons of the "anti-Semite" Minister Haman (Hitler) were hanged and Haman's 1 daughter committed suicide. This Jewish "holiday" is celebrated every year as "Purim."

For the cruel and vindictive Allies, simple murder wasn’t enough. The executioners used a “short drop” instead of a neck-breaking “long drop”. The victims thus died a longer death due to strangulation. Additionally, the trapdoor was too small, such that several of the men suffered bleeding head injuries when they hit the sides of the trapdoor while falling. Adding final insult to injury, the bodies were cremated and scattered over a river, denying the families the right of burial.

The circumstances of the Nuremberg travesty have long been known to your humble author, as well as to many loyal readers of TomatoBubble.com. But what is new to Mike King & Sugar the Cat is the discovery of just how many prominent personages of that period so vehemently condemned the Nuremberg murder circus. Thanks to a book sent to me by a dear comrade-in-informational-arms down in Florida, we learned that several hundred prominent American and European political figures, writers, artists and military men were not only anti-Nuremberg, but also outspoken about it, both during and after the event. Naturally, the true story of the opposition to Nuremberg is one that has been buried by the whores and ignoramuses we refer to as "court historians".

The eye-opening book is entitled, 'Doenitz at Nuremberg: A Re-Appraisal'. It is not really a book in the conventional sense as it is a collection of the 'on the record' statements made by about 200 VIP's. For World War II truthers, the usefulness of the book lies in its ability to penetrate the thick skulls of our uninformed brethren who remain under the impression that Nuremberg was some sort of holy tribunal.

You see, when us "extremists" condemn the abomination of Nuremberg, we can be dismissed as "Nazi sympathizers" or "conspiracy theorists" or, that ultimate kiss-of-death, "anti-Semites" TM. But when we can demonstrate that big names, including many high-ranking American and European military brass, were disgusted by what happened at Nuremberg; it adds "credibility" to the revisionist case. Of course, it is tragic, pathetic really, that most people have to outsource their own God-given brains to "experts" with lots of "credentials" in order to arrive at an opinion; but 'it is what it is'.

Following is but a small sample of the 'big shots' that opposed Nuremberg; accompanied by snippets from their strong public statements.

Senator Robert Taft
"The trial of the vanquished by the victors cannot be impartial no matter how it is hedged ...About this whole judgement there is the spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice."

Taylor Caldwell
"I have been boiling mad for years over the "war crimes trials" which I think were despicable and contemptible and smack more of ancient Rome's barbarians than of a so-called civilized society."

Justice Learned Hand
'I have always regarded the Nuremberg prosecutions as a step backward in international law and a precedent which will prove embarrassing in the future."

Admiral Stanton Merrill
"I consider the 'war crimes trials' in general and the trials of Admiral Doenitz in particular, a matter of mass hypocrisy resulting from a war-bred hangover."

Admiral Frederick Horne
"As it has been my belief that the after-war emotional hysteria was responsible for the trial and imprisonment of the German high-ranking military and naval officers,and that we should reflect with shame upon our efforts for revenge upon men doing what we would do for our own country, I am glad to have my name included in any effort to atone for the injustice done to Admiral Doenitz and to any others who were likewise unfairly treated because they loved their country."

Adolph Menjou
" I was appalled to see Soviet Russia judging when they themselves were guilty. I am happy to join my name to those attempting to make amends to Admiral Doenitz."

image
Shut up St. Albert, you Stalin-loving piece of filth. Just shut the bloody hell up!

Chateau Heartiste #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Dating Market Value Test For Women

UPDATE:

I’ve adjusted the scoring and categories a bit because the test was skewed somewhat toward lower scores. For those who have arguments with my scoring system, understand that it is based on averages. I’m sure everyone knows a 34 year old woman who is just as hot as the average 22 year old girl, but the exceptions don’t make the rules.

And a note on BMI:
I used the 1959 Met Life height-weight insurance charts as guides as they are the most accurate (before American “grade inflation” made obese the new normal). A 5’10” 140lb woman would have a BMI of 20.1, which puts her well within the most desirable BMI category.

*****

If you are a woman, this test will measure your dating market value. The higher the number, the better quality man you can catch. The lower the number, the more likely you will find yourself surrounded by cats. Unlike the male version of this test, here I have added a sliding scale to some of the questions because this better reflects the outsized importance that certain factors have on a woman’s total sexual value.

Guys, you may take this quiz for your girlfriends or wives to see if you have settled for tepid sex once a week or if you always get hard looking at her and never forget her birthday.

1. How old are you?

15 to 16 years old: +5 points
17 to 20 years old: +10 points
21 to 25 years old: +8 points
26 to 29 years old: +3 point
30 to 33 years old: 0 points
33 to 36 years old: -1 point
37 to 40 years old: -5 points
41 to 45 years old: -8 points
46 to 49 years old: -10 points
over 49: you’ve hit the wall. waysa?

2. How important is makeup to your appearance?

It slightly enhances my looks: 0 points
I look like a different woman with makeup: -1 point
I’m a natural beauty. My morning face looks the same as my evening face: +1 point

3. What is your IQ? (This relates tangentially to your ability to connect emotionally with a man.)

Under 85: -1 point
85 to 100: 0 points
101 to 120: +1 point
121 to 145: 0 points
Over 145: -1 point

*****

The following ten questions deal with the physical attractiveness of your body.

4. Your breast size is:

Bee stings up to A cup: -1 point
B cup: 0 points
C cup: +1 point
D cup, naturally firm: +2 points
DD cup, firm: +1 point
E cup and up: 0 points

5. Your breasts look firm and pert when you wear:

A bra: 0 points
An underwire push-up bra: -1 point
Nothing: +1 point

6. How long are your legs in relation to your height?

Long: +1 point
Average: 0 points
Short: -1 point

7. What is the shape of your ass?

Flat: -1 point
Round and fleshy: +1 point
Round, fleshy, and firm: +2 points
Flat and saggy: -2 points
Just average: 0 points

8. How flat is your stomach?

Cutting board flat: +1 point
Slight pouch: 0 points
Muffin top: -1 point
Flabby beer gut and fupa: -10 points

9. How toned are your upper arms?

Very toned, I can see my triceps: +1 point
Average, not flabby: 0 points
If I hold my arm out, I can wobble the fat underneath my upper arm: -1 point

10. How big are your hands?

Delicate piano fingers, proportionally small: +1 point
Average size: 0 points
Manhands: -1 point

11. Where is there hair on your body?

My head and pubic area only: +1 point
I have to shave my legs daily and wax my bushy eyebrows: 0 points
I have dark forearm hair and a mustache: -1 point
Nipples, asscrack, and that giant mole on my back: -2 points

12. Get a tape ruler and measure around your waist and your hips. Divide your waist number by your hip number. This ratio is:

0.65 to 0.75: +1 point
0.55 to 0.64: 0 points
under 0.55: -1 point
0.76 to 0.85: 0 points
0.85 to 0.95: -1 point
over 0.95: -2 points

13. What is your BMI?

(Go here to calculate your BMI. The scoring of female BMI varies somewhat from that of male BMI because aesthetics, not just general health, have to be taken into consideration.)

under 14.1: -10 points
14.1 to 15.0: -5 points
15.1 to 16.5: 0 points
16.6 to 17.4: +3 points
17.5 to 21.0: +10 points
21.1 to 23.0: +3 points
23.1 to 24.5: 0 points
24.6 to 28.0: -5 points
28.1 to 33.0: -10 points
over 33.0: stop taking this quiz. you get nothing! you lose! good day madam!

*****

The next ten questions are the section of the test that measures your facial beauty. Since so much of a woman’s dating market value resides in the appeal of her face, I have chosen to examine some traits in finer detail. To illustrate how very subtle changes in facial characteristics can mean the difference between beautiful and ugly, look at these two photos:

imageimage

I do not even have to label these photos because almost all my readers viewing them, men and women, will instinctively know which is the hot girl and which is not. Remember this the next time someone tells you beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

14. On a scale of 1 to 10, how pretty are you?

Note: Do not bother soliciting the opinions of the following people, because they will not give you a truthful answer.

Your family.
Your heterosexual female friends.
Your homosexual male friends.
Your heterosexual male friends who would sleep with you given the chance.

Instead, put your pic up on hotornot and check back in a week. Otherwise, go with what you’ve overheard through the grapevine by people who weren’t your close friends, or suck it up and try to be as honest with yourself as possible. Lesbians will also give you an accurate appraisal as long as it is through a third party and not directly to your face. Use the photos above as guidelines. Adjust your rating based on how close your facial morphology matches one or the other.

0: don’t bothering finishing this test.
1 to 2: -10 points
3 to 4: -5 points
5: -1 point
6: +2 points
7: +5 points
8 to 9: +8 points
10: +12 points

15. How clear is your skin?

No acne, blemishes, or poorly located moles: 0 points
Some combination of the above: -1 point
People are always telling you how silky smooth your skin looks: +1 point

16. Do you have any noticeable deformities?

Yes, minor: -1 point
Yes, major: -10 points
No: 0 points

17. How full are your lips?

Pencil thin: -1 point
Average: 0 points
Juicily plump: +1 point
Weirdly oversized: 0 points

18. How high is your forehead?

Low: -1 point
Average: 0 points
High: +1 point

19. How long is your jawline from ear to chin?

Long: -1 point
Average: 0 points
Short: +1 point

20. How big is your chin?

Small: +1 point
Average: 0 points
Large: -1 point

21. How big is your nose?

Small: +1 point
Average: 0 points
Large: -1 point

22. In proportion to the size of your face, are your eyes:

Large and saucer-like: +1 point
Normal-sized: 0 points
Small and beady: -1 point

23. Is the distance between your eyes:

Wide: +1 point
Average: 0 points
Narrow: -1 point

The bottom line on female facial beauty is that as the lower half of her face becomes smaller and more delicate, making her eyes and cheekbones appear more prominent, the better looking she will be.

*****

The final eleven questions measure your femininity, sexiness, and pleasing personality traits. This is the closest to “game” that women have at their disposal. It isn’t much, which is why the scoring is lowest in this section.

24. You frequently wear sexy lingerie, even when not prepping for a hot date.

Yes: +1 point
Special occasions only: 0 points
Never. Ripped and stained comfy granny panties only: -1 point

25. When someone gets hurt you are the first to ask if they are OK and to deliver aid if needed.

Almost always: +1 point
Occasionally: 0 points
Almost never: -1 point

26. You are highly competitive and often play co-ed team sports.

Yes, and I will throw an elbow if necessary. My shelf is filled with trophies: -1 point
I like to exercise on nice days with one on one sports like tennis: +1 point
I’m competitive with other girls, but not guys: 0 points

27. When a guy approaches you in a bar, regardless of your attraction for him, you:

Smile and look at him: +1 point
Pretend like you don’t notice him coming: 0 points
Frown and tell him you’re talking to your friends before he even gets a chance to say Hi: -1 point

28. On a first date the check arrives for dinner and drinks. You:

Offer to split the check or even pay in full: +1 point
Smile and thank the guy when he pays for the check: 0 points
Forget to thank him after he pays for your ungrateful ass: -1 point

29. You are about to have sex with a guy for the first time. He undresses and his penis is small. Do you:

Tell him how great his cock looks and feels?: +1 point
Say nothing: 0 points
Look surprised and stifle a laugh: -1 point

30. You think blowjobs are:

Great! You give them spontaneously and there’s never any doubt how much you enjoy it: +1 point
An obligation: 0 points
Gross. You gave one after your BF proposed and spit it on his shoes: -1 point

31. Do you do anal?

Yes, and it makes me come to know how much it pleases my man: +1 point
Only when I get really drunk: 0 points
Never. It’s an exit only: -1 point

32. The number of sex positions you have tried is:

3 to 10: 0 points
Missionary and doggy style only: -1 point
I’m a contortionist: +1 point

33. How often do you curse?

I think I said damn once: +1 point
I blurt out fuck and shit a few times a week: 0 points
My mouth is a gutter: -1 point

34. You’d best describe your sense of fashion as:

I’m a label whore: -1 point
I hide my body under baggy tees and ill-fitting jeans: -1 point
I wear casual clothing that flatters my figure: 0 points
I wear stylish clothing on weeknights and I can handle heels over 3 inches: +1 point
My flip flops have my foot imprint in them: -2 points

*****

SCORING

There is a minimum of -83 points and a maximum of 64 points to earn based on the questions asked. The reason the minimum score goes lower than the maximum score goes high is because there are a few things, such as gross obesity, old age, or a major facial deformity, that seriously negatively impact a woman’s overall rating to the point of market extinction.

The scoring breaks down as follows:

-83: You are proof that god does not exist, but that satan does.
-82 to -56: You’re an omega. If it makes you feel better you will have your choice of male omegas to bang.
-55 to -40: The majority of men are disgusted by the sight of you. Your kind will suffer most when our sexbot overlords arrive. Losers hit on you constantly figuring they have a chance.
-39 to -20: You were born to cockblock. But you’ll manage to marry a table scrap.
-19 to -5: Lesser beta. The men you want make fun of you out of earshot. You spend many years learning how to settle for mediocre betas.
-4 to 14: Classic beta. Your hot friends always gets hit on first, but if you really tramp it up you can snag a slightly better than average guy to take you home for a single night of commitment.
15 to 29: Greater beta. More than a few attractive guys will approach you. But if your personality is flawed you risk becoming a pump and dump victim.
30 to 43: You are officially a nascent alpha female. A lot of quality guys will hit on you and you will be able to pick and choose at your leisure. But don’t push it. You’re not quite hot enough to string guys along forever.
44 to 55: You’re a bona fide hottie. Nearly every guy who meets you agrees you are a hottie. So does every girl. This puts you in the top 1% of worldwide womanhood. With great power comes great responsibility, so try to limit the number of men you torture with blueballs and LJFB rejections to fewer than 100 in your social circle. As long as you are not a complete bitch, marriage with a top quality man will come easily to you.
56 to 63: Guys want you, girls want to be you. You are just short of perfection, which paradoxically means you will get hit on more than the super alpha females. You are a player’s greatest challenge, and his greatest reward, because unlike the perfect woman there is still something human about you. Sex, love, security, commitment, easy living… you have it all. Only your demons can defeat you.
64: Super Alpha. The world is yours. Life is an endless parade of joy and excitement. Your power is illimitable… for now.

I hope everyone noticed what was missing from this test:

Your job.
The amount of money you make.
Your accomplishments.
Your social status and number of friends.
Your deep and profound worldview.

Unlike the men who took my Male Dating Market Value test, I do not expect *any* women to be completely honest with themselves taking the Female Dating Market Value test. The female ego is simply way too fragile to absorb the shock of such a brutal self-assessment. Therefore, I will be mentally subtracting 10 points from every woman who posts her score here in the comments.

(Submitter's note: Compare and contrast Dating Market Value Test For Men)

metabuxx #crackpot incels.co

[Serious] I've NEVER met a virgin man above 20 who didn't want to kill himself

20 years of being treated as a subhuman by holes, being shunned for their genes, not experiencing milestones (first kiss, first date, teen love), having every effort fail, but still being bombarded by virtue signalling and gaslighting can drive a man towards insanity and depression.

Those men are nothing but walking corpses who are somehow surviving, trying their best to get through this wretched life. They spend the days of their miserable existence rotting and contemplating suicide.

They survive to make Chads look even more attractive and they know it. So they continue to walk, eat and sleep, hoping that on some fortunate day they'll be lucky enough not to wake up.

In case IT screenshots this thread"B-but I've met 30 year old virgin men who are living happily and enjoying things they love to do. Sex isn't important." :soy::soy:

NO THEY ARE NOT HAPPY, YOU DUMB FUCKING CUNT. YOU CAN'T SURVIVE A SINGLE DAY WITHOUT CHAD'S DICK AND HERE YOU ARE GASLIGHTING US ABOUT SEX. JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP. :reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee:

Bob Larson #fundie demontest.com

21 Demon Test Questions

Do you have a demon? Take this short quiz to find out if you are at risk.

1) Do you sometimes exhibit uncontrollable outbursts of anger or violence?
2) Have you experimented with two or more forms of the occult?
3) Have you been sexually violated (raped, incested, molested)?
4) Do you sometimes manifest behavior not consistent with your normal personality?
5) Do you abuse alcohol or drugs to escape painful past experiences in life?
6) Do you commit immoral or illegal acts, contrary to your customary values?
7) Have you ever attempted or contemplated suicide?
8) Are you sometimes overwhelmed with feelings of severe depression and hopelessness?
9) Do you indulge in self-abusive behavior such as anorexia, bulimia, cutting or self-mutilation?
10) Have you experienced life-changing trauma from which you haven't recovered?
11) Do you know of ancestors who committed murder, suicide, or sexual perversion?
12) Do voices tell you to commit illegal acts, blaspheme God, or indulge in immoral acts?
13) Have you asked Satan to take your life in exchange for something?
14) Do you live a fear-based life resulting in paranoia or multiple phobias?
15) Have you experienced emotional or physical abuse from your biological parents?
16) Have you been emotionally or physically abandoned by either biological parent?
17) Have you felt repeated, disabling episodes of rejection or depression?
18) Have you failed repeatedly in significant relationships?
19) Have you failed to experience trust and lasting love from a significant other?
20) Do you consistently experience serious health or financial issues?
21) Are you significantly hindered in prayer, worship, Bible reading and church attendance?

Lookismisreal #sexist incel.life

Even among fellow Incels Elliot Rodger is a controversial figure, due to some Incels considering him to be a fakecel or a mentalcel. But regardless of what you think about him, you cannot deny the fact that he absolutely did nothing wrong. He was nothing but a victim of the degenerate society; just like the rest of us. The only difference between him and us is that, he took matters into his own hands so he could lash out against the oppressors who bullied, shunned, and mocked him consistently for the things he had no control of.

While things clearly did not go as he planned to, Elliot still managed to take out three normans out of the equation; while the other three being Incels. And because of this, most Incels persecute him, because in their view, he should have not killed the three Incels. My question to them is why? Yes, he should have taken out a bunch of femoids rather than killing some low-tier normans and Incels. But what he actually did was a much more noble than the scenario that he originally planned to follow. Why do I say that? Because he put three Incels out of their misery forever.

If those Incels were still alive I would have no doubt that they would be posting on Incel communities discussing about the femoids nature, the blackpill and whatnot. Just like us, they would also be filled with anger, sadness, hatred and resentness towards this world and wishing everyday that they had the courage to end it by roping themselves. But thanks to Elliot, they didn't have to suffer the afflictions that we have to undergo everyday, due to him offering them salvation.

If I were to be honest, I would gladly meet my death at the hand of the likes of Elliot Rodger. I truly respect him for figuring out the femoid nature and preaching blackpill gospel. He was truly a Saint.

Hunter Wallace #racist #wingnut occidentaldissent.com

[From "Southern History Series: The White League of Louisiana"]

Editor’s Note: The Rainbow Confederates are unable to explain why thousands of Confederate veterans banded together to overthrow the government of Louisiana during Reconstruction instead of settling down to enjoy the fruits of the new multiracial democratic paradise.

The following excerpt which appeared in The Franklin Enterprise before the election of 1874 describes the formation of the White League in Louisiana during the later days of Reconstruction. It comes from Stephen Budiansky’s book The Bloody Shirt: Terror After The Civil War:

“We ask for no assistance; we protest against any intervention. We own this soil of Louisiana, by virtue of our endeavor, as a heritage from our ancestors, and it is ours, and ours alone. Science, literature, history, art, civilization, and law belong alone to us, and not to the negroes. They have no record but barbarism and idolatry, nothing since the war but that of error, incapacity, beastliness, voudouism, and crime. Their right to vote is but the result of the war, their exercise of it a monstrous imposition, and a vindictive punishment upon us for that ill-advised rebellion.

Therefore we are banding together in a White League army, drawn up only on the defensive, exasperated by continual wrong, it is true, but acting under Christian and high-principled leaders, and determined to defeat these negroes in their infamous design of depriving us of all we hold sacred and precious on the soil of our nativity or adoption, or perish in the attempt.

Come what may, upon the radical party must rest the whole responsibility of this conflict, as sure as there is a just God in heaven, their unnatural, cold-blooded and revengeful measures of reconstruction in Louisiana will meet with a terrible retribution.”

Here is the platform of the White League:

“Disregarding all minor questions of principle or policy, and having solely in view the maintenance of our hereditary civilization and Christianity menaced by a stupid Africanization, we appeal to men of our race, of whatever language or nationality, to unite with us against that supreme danger. A league of whites is the inevitable result of that formidable, oath-bound, and blindly obedient league of the blacks, which, under the command of the most cunning and unscrupulous negroes in the State, may at any moment plunge us into a war of races . . . It is with some hope that a timely and proclaimed union of the whites as a race, and their efficient preparation for any emergency, may arrest the threatened horrors of social war, and teach the blacks to beware of further insolence and aggression, that we call upon the men of our race to leave in abeyance all lesser considerations; to forget all differences of opinions and all race prejudices of the past, and with no object in view but the common good of both races, to unite with us in an earnest effort to re-establish a white man’s government in the city and the State.”

Does that sound like the eternal principles of classical liberalism? In Louisiana and other Southern states, classical liberalism to the extent it ever existed here was always counterbalanced by the even more powerful authoritarian forces of slavery and white supremacy.

Louisiana was one of three Southern states with black majorities which had the worst, most bitter experience with Reconstruction. The other two states were Mississippi and South Carolina. The enfranchisement of the former slaves and the disenfranchisement of Confederate veterans by the Radical Republicans produced an explosive situation in the state. Louisiana came to be ruled by carpetbaggers who plundered the prostrate state on the basis of the black vote.

The White League was a paramilitary organization composed of Confederate veterans which fought to restore white supremacy in Louisiana. This culminated in the Battle of Liberty Place in 1874 when 5,000 members of the White League fought and defeated the forces of the Republican carpetbag governor in the streets of New Orleans. The White League actually took New Orleans and the Louisiana State House, but was forced to withdraw after President Grant sent federal troops to relieve the city.

Why was the Yankee occupation so bitterly resented in Louisiana? Shouldn’t everyone in Louisiana have celebrated abolition and the triumph of the universal principles of the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal” and meekly submitted to black majority rule? This is a peculiarly Yankee perspective of the American Revolution that was utterly foreign to the South. The Old South believed in classical republicanism, not classical liberalism. These men celebrated “liberty” in the sense that they saw themselves as the Roman paterfamilias of their plantations.

Louisianans believed that the sort of “liberty” and “equality” and “democracy” unleashed in their state during Reconstruction was utterly destructive and was a moral smokescreen calculated to dispossess them in their own lands while enriching Yankee carpetbags in the process.

VileGeneticTrash #fundie incels.co

Arrogance and never accepting fault is so important

Slightly off topic. For anxietycels and mentalcels out there I have finally learned how to overcome all anxiety and feelings of inferiority. The main sources of both in my life at the moment is job interviews. I am about to finish my STEM degree and I'm faced with the dreaded task of being grilled by large engineering companies comprised of super important baby boomer scum. I essentially cheated my way through my degree and retained nothing so I know I'm going to make a fool out of myself during job interviews. I'm insecure as fuck about my face so it will be nerve-racking having a room of people judge my looks. My social skills are extremely poor after living nearly 24/7 in my room for the last 5 years with no social interaction.

Last week I had a work experience interview and I definitely fucked up but I don't care. I brutally ARROGANTMOGGED the boomer faggot interviewing me. He asked me a question about some obscure concept I learned in second year that has no relevance to the job. I had no fucking clue so I glared at him and acted pissed off he would ask such a stupid question. I bullshitted an answer with some sarcasm thrown in and made him feel bad for being such a dumb cunt for throwing in that question. It was HIS fault I didn't know the answer, not mine. Last year I would have contemplated suicide afterwards from embarrassment and inferiority. He was also like 5'7 and I was 6'5 with my lifts in so despite my fucking ugly face and pathetic wrists I brutally mogged that faggot.

Feels fucking good.

Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

Every National Day of Prayer, it’s the same old dribble: “God, bless America–You know, that same country that is banning prayers to You and spitting in Your face 24/7. Heal our land because we’re suddenly so repentant and concerned about treating You with respect–can’t You tell by the way we’re all droning the same words at You and treating You like You’re some kind of blind idiot?” Who are we kidding? The Church has turned the National Day of Prayer into a national day of treating God like He’s a moron. It’s time to wake up and realize that you can’t do someone else’s repenting for them. Stop insulting God by trying to tell Him about what is going on in other people’s hearts because the truth is that you don’t know what you’re talking about. God knows how America feels about Him, and our constant lying and whitewashing isn’t going to blind Him to the reality that most Americans are steeped in spiritual rebellion with no interest in repenting. No, we’re really not sorry. We’re too busy legalizing sin and celebrating irreverence to be sorry. Even God’s own people are insulting Him 24/7 by constantly bossing Him around and never shutting up long enough to listen to what He has to say. No, He’s really not going to bless America. He is going to spank America, along with the Christians who live in it. The Church desperately needs a refresher course on what it means to revere God. The next major wave of spiritual activity we’re going to see in this country is not going to be some happy Jesus movement. It’s going to be a violent storm of Divine discipline which is going to remind us all that we are not God’s supervisors.

The next time some idiot leader in the Church invites you to join them in reading some irreverent pile of hypocritical guff at God, you’d better pass. And if you need some national holiday to remind you to talk to your Makers, then there’s a serious crisis that needs to be addressed. Ask the Holy Spirit to teach you how to be a better listener so that you won’t keep missing the things that God is sharing with you. Ask Him to teach you how to improve the way you talk to your Gods. It starts with getting the focus off of yourself and asking Yahweh, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit to make Their goals, Their feelings, and Their desires far more important to you than your own.

His Love is Eternal #fundie fanfiction.net

[Bible Fan Fiction?]

Many people in these troubled times claim that gay men were born with the hateful desires they have. I am here to tell you that they are wrong. I used to live the homosexual lifestyle for many years until Christ came to me and showed me the lie I was living. I asked Him to come into my heart and make me whole again, and He did!

When I was a child, my mother was diagnosed with Leukemia. I prayed to God that if He cured her and let her live, I would never again ask Him for another selfish thing in my entire life. But The Lord felt it was time to take her away from her suffering and back into His loving arms, and her earthly body passed away. My hateful father began abusing me after my mother died. He was a gay man, and he took out his sick pedophillic desires on me for years and years.

Eventually I began to hate The Lord for the things He had (righteously) done to my life. In a moment of selfishness, I decided that since God was not giving me the petty little things that I asked for, this was justification for me to begin breaking His commandments and doing whatever I pleased.

I am ashamed to say that when I reached adolescence, I began to have unnatural sexual feelings for men because of the gay sex acts that my pedophile father had performed on me as a child. At first, I was rightfully disgusted by these feelings, as all good people should be, but the devil whispered my name to the gay people at my school and they started to pressure me to conform to their hateful lifestyle. They said me that being gay was not bad, and that it was God who was wrong, not them. Can you believe that? Those gays thought they had better judgment than the Creator of the universe itself!

The gay men and their demons told me that it was okay to give in to the devil's temptations, since there was no God anyway. And besides they said, God loved everybody regardless of their sexuality so it was fine if someone wanted to have sex with other men, or with animals, or with innocent children. It brings me great shame to admit that I gave in to their relentless pressures and started to engage in sick homosexual activities.

At first I only had gay sex with a few people, but as I became more comfortable in my rejection of God's Word, the numbers increased rapidly until I, like many gay men, was having sex with hundreds of different partners. I hung out in gay bars and picked up men I didn't even know, with whom I would have sex and then never see again. It was at this time that the devil introduced me to drugs. It was marijuana at first, but soon I was using heroin and methamphetamine on a regular basis. Looking back, it was just a way to dull the natural pain of being so separated from God because of my evil, unnatural lifestyle.

I attended anti-Christian LGBT rallies, where I would march alongside men who wore women's clothing and people who advocated pedophilia (NAMBLA). Sometimes we would block innocent people from entering churches because they didn't think it was right let us do whatever we wanted to, even if it was against God's Word. I was told by some of these good people that what I was doing was wrong, but I just sneered at them and called them hateful bigots. My mind was closed to the sinful evil I was committing by hurting these good, honest, loving people in the name of hateful organizations that want to rewrite God's word to make it "okay to be gay."

At this point I was engaging in orgies and all kinds of horrible fetishes every day and I got addicted to using drugs to cover the shame I (rightfully) felt. Like most gay men, I began using drugs without regard for my safety, and it is a miracle of God that I did not get AIDS from sharing needles and having unprotected sex with disgusting homosexual men. I began to contemplate suicide because that it was okay since there was no afterlife anyway. Although I blamed God and His Christian followers for my depression, I now know that it was actually a result of my sinful lifestyle as a homosexual. The devil, who had tricked me into thinking I was born gay, wanted me to kill myself then so that I could never see Christ's Kingdom! Instead, he wanted me to burn in Hell with the other homosexuals.

Then one day, just as I was at my lowest point, something amazing happened. Someone, I don't know who, left a so called 'Chick Tract' on my doorstep. I had seen these before, but this time The Lord guided me to read it and take in its true message. It was about how homosexuals are abominations in the eyes of God, and the only way to be saved from such a hateful lifestyle is to accept the loving, wonderful embrace of Jesus Christ. All at once I realized how foolish I had been to indulge my evil fleshly desires.

The gay lifestyle I had been living was destroying me, and more importantly destroying my soul. But there was and is salvation in Jesus Christ! As soon as I came to this realization, I literally fell on my knees and called out to Christ, asking Him to save me from the evil spirit of homosexuality that pervaded every aspect of my life. And He did, even though as a homosexual and an atheist I most certainly did not deserve it.

My life began to get better from then on, now that I wasn't letting the devil lead me around like all the other gays. Christ protected me and showed me the true nature of those evil men I had listened to, who told me that I was born gay and that God loves people who rape children and that there is no afterlife. I saw for the first time what a vile life I had been living, sodomizing other men every night and calling those who had tried to show me the righteous way bigots. Soon, I joined a Baptist church, where I truly felt at peace for the first time in many years. The Love of Christ did what the so called "love" of hundreds of gay men could not. I know now that I am truly Saved from my sinful evil by His gracious and loving sacrifice on the cross all those years ago.

To any and all homosexuals that may be reading this: I know you will probably close your minds immediately and refuse to accept the Truth that I am offering to you, because the demons in your life are screaming to drown out my words. Still, I will say it if it will help even one homosexual leave such a sinful lifestyle and join the Faithful with Christ in Heaven. Homosexuality is wrong and unnatural. The media and your friends and even your so called "pastor" may tell you that it's okay to break the laws of God, but it's not. What you are doing is an abomination in the eyes of The Lord and you must realize this before you can truly accept His gracious offering of salvation.

If you are willing to accept that your lifestyle is sinful and evil and against God's will, then all you have to do is ask Christ to come into your heart and save you. If you are not willing to do this, then I must warn you that you will go to Hell when you die. I know it is hard to take in, but God is not going to allow gays into His Eternal Kingdom. You must repent your vile behavior and ask for the salvation of Christ before you can be saved.

All you have to do is say "Jesus, please save me from the demon of homosexuality!" and He will come into you.

Remember, God's Love for you is eternal!

Purest Colloids #conspiracy purestcolloids.com

By now nearly everyone has seen the story about Paul Karason who the news media has dubbed "The Blue Man". Although the news media has continually said that he was taking colloidal silver, nothing could be further from the truth. The Blue Man story became a major media disinformation event which was produced by a public relations firm and paid for by a pharmaceutical interest. The purpose of this campaign was to scare the public away from using colloidal silver products. The tactic was to claim that the Blue Man's condition was caused by his use of colloidal silver thus implying that anyone who uses colloidal silver would suffer a similar fate. The entire story as presented is a study in blatant misrepresentation. The fact is that Paul has a condition called argyria that turns the skin a blue-gray color. He got this condition by taking his homemade silver compound that was mostly a highly concentrated ionic silver solution. When he prepared the solution he believed he was making colloidal silver. He was not making colloidal silver. To make the solution even more dangerous, he added salt to the brew and then used electrolysis to make a high concentration of silver chloride with large particles which is well known to cause argyria. He further applied the compound to his skin causing him to become an internal and external photographic plate. To finish himself off, he used a tanning bed to "fix" the silver in his body. The moral of the story is to know the difference between true colloidal silver and ionic silver or silver proteins, and don't try to make either at home! (True colloidal silver cannot be made at home.)

The Blue Man charade demonstrates once again that the mass media cannot be trusted to report anything that even resembles a truthful "news" story. All "news" today is propagated with an agenda just like the phony economic statistics put out the U.S. government.

usachinanukewar #fundie usachinanukewar.wordpress.com

I already have a huge jumbo, gigantic, colossal crush on Jesus, because He is an immortal gorgeous white. He must look very extremely yummy and hot, the real hottest Entity. Jesus is my Babe and Darling. And by the way, China and USA go to war and nuke war. Oh baby, it’s just like the top 2 warriors go slaughtering each other. It’s gotta be the most exciting warfare. Both with highly sophisticated weaponry go slaughtering each other to define who’s the boss on the planet earth. I’d rather see this deadly war when I’m in Heaven. With my immortal eyes wide open, I’m gotta be fully enjoying seeing the top 2 nuclear-armed warriors’ deadly warfare and nuke war, the grandest fireworks ever in the modern ages. The war of the No.1. and No.2. It’s gotta be the most explosive and hottest war ever.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
With my immortal eyes wide open, my sight and vision can penetrate into the atmospheres of the earth and see pretty clear during this deadliest war, China and USA engaging at all-out war while I’m immortally present in Heaven with my Darling, Lord Jesus Christ. China and USA go to war. Oh baby, this is gotta be the hottest war ever, the most explosive one. No.1. and No.2., the top 2 warriors go to war and nuke war. This is gotta be the best ever reality horror show and war movie I’ve ever seen in all my life. I’m gotta love seeing this all-out war when I’m in Heaven. Just let me preemptively get my own immortal body, meet Jesus in the air, fly to Heaven. When I am in Heaven, I do really desperately wanna see China and USA go to all-out nuke war, the grandest. Baby.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
When China and USA go to nuke war while i’m immortally present in Heaven, I desperately wanna be hugged so tight in the arms of Jesus so that i can kiss Jesus’ immortal jaw and neck while we both enjoy watching this grandest fireworks of nuke war after Jesus breaks open the Seals to trigger World War 3, all written in the chapter 6 of the Book of Revelation. I do really wanna be hugged tight in the arms of Jesus when enjoying seeing this World War 3. Of course, I’ll be smiling sweetly in the arms of Jesus. I’m grinning in front of my laptop now. Just like an emperor sitting in his throne who holds his beloved queen tight while conducting his armies and troops and launching warfare and defeating enemies, so brilliant and tender at the same time. Jesus is my Emperor, indeed, my beloved Emperor now and forever. And while we both enjoy watching this grandest nuke war massacre, I can feed grapes to Jesus with my own immortal gorgeous fingertips and of course I remain being hugged tight in the arms of Jesus. Just imagine this picture. So lovely and sweet. And, I’m grinning in front of my laptop.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
And of course while being hugged tight in the arms of Jesus, I’m completely overwhelmed and covered with the divine sweet scent, smell, body temperature of Jesus. And, with my immortal back sticking on Jesus’ chest, I can feel the divine fluctuations of Jesus’ breathing, air in and air out. Jesus and I both are delighted and enjoy watching this grandest nuke war massacre taking place on the planet earth, wiping out one-fourths of the ungodly people after the Church Rapture. And, don’t worry. Jesus already promises me that I’m gotta have some immortal Chinese buddies in Heaven. So, the Chinese and Taiwanese blood is gotta be preserved for eternity, immortally. In Heaven, I’m simply the sweetest little teddy bear for Jesus to hug tight, and I’m gotta be the sweetest immortal ice-cream boy that always melts down in the arms of Jesus on Jesus’ chest whenever Jesus and I hang out with each other in my own mansion or on an island in the Pacific. And of course I’m gotta strip Jesus off just shirtless, not completely naked. I wanna be hugged tight in the arms of Jesus on His divine gorgeous shirtless chest so that I can press my immortal gorgeous face on His shirtless chest touching and feeling the immortal smoothness of Jesus’ skin. And, I wanna kiss His shirtless chest. So sweet and lovely. Forever joy living with my Emperor and Darling. I love Jesus, unconditionally and irrevocably. I’m Jesus’ Bella Boy, and Jesus is my Immortal Edward, the real ultra-richest Entity and the real smartest, most brilliant Brain. I desperately love the man with brain, and I’ve found Jesus as my Super Sugar Daddy and Man. He is my Man, my Immortal Man. And our sweet love story is gotta be lasting for eternity. Never End. I’m grinning now in front of my laptop.

Rajkumar Richard #fundie christianapologeticsalliance.com


A god Who Admits All People to Heaven is…(God Cannot Save All People)

Very minimally, Universalism or Inclusivism asserts that God will save all people whether they believe in Christ or not. However, Universalism severely debilitates God, which I will now strive to elaborate.

For the purpose of differentiating the god of the Universalists from the living Triune God, I have named the god of the Universalists as ‘unigod.’

Who is this unigod, who supposedly saves all people? What is he worth?

Worth Nothing – A Cruel, Unjust God, Unmindful of Sins

Man, if he is to love and worship God, should be aware of God’s attributes or nature. Minimally, love and justice are significant communicable attributes. (Attributes that are perfect in God but also found in humans to a degree are ‘Communicable Attributes.’)

A god who loves all, even those who hate and abuse him, seems to be a loving God. But a careful examination of this love reveals cruelty.

Those who hate God say, “I do not want to live with God.” But if God forces those who hate HIM to be with HIM unto eternity, this certainly smacks of slavery. Holding people against their will is slavery. None accept, agree, or admire slavery. This is cruelty in its glory.

But this is apparently what unigod does to people. Unigod forces people to be with him unto eternity. So, unigod is not loving, but cruel.

Consider God’s attribute of justice. Justice is a disposition to do that which is morally right. Presence of ‘right’ requires a ‘wrong;’ this is analogous to rust requiring a metal.

Since evil is rampant in the world, common man expects the authorities to punish evil. But unigod, as an apparent ultimate authority, does not punish evil, for he allows even a horrendously evil person to enter into heaven.

We would be extremely saddened and frustrated if we are victims of injustice. An authority who fails to provide justice is unjust or evil. By allowing a horrendously evil person to inherit the greatest good (heaven), the unigod reveals his unjust and evil attributes.

Significantly, unigod, who supposedly saves all people, is unmindful of sins. Sin is an assault on the Holy God, who is the maximally great being. But unigod, by virtue of apparently forgiving unrepentant people of their sins, does not consider sins to be an assault on HIS holiness.

In other words, holiness, love and justice are not the attributes of unigod.

Unworthy of Worship

Worship is man’s response to God’s worthiness. God should be worshipped for HE alone is worthy of our worship (adoration, thanksgiving, prayers etc.). God deserves this response from all people.

From the perspective of Historic Christianity, since God so loved the world, HE gave HIS only Son, so that those who believe in the Son of God will receive eternal life (John 3: 16). Salvation of mankind (those who believe in Christ) is an outcome of God’s love for man. Since salvation is God first act (through HIS love to redeem man from his sin), the believer loves God, and worships HIM always. The living God reveals HIS worth to HIS people by HIS blessed presence, and offers hope that HE, through HIS second coming, will fulfill all HIS promises (e.g. eliminate evil forever). Thus man worships this Almighty, loving, gracious and a compassionate God.

In contrast how does unigod reveal his worthiness to his people? All that he supposedly does is to save all men (universal salvation). If this is his only or primary revelatory act of worthiness, then unigod has placed himself in a precariously quicksand situation.

Think about this. We DO NOT need to worship unigod. What do we gain or lose by not worshipping unigod? Nothing!

Will we lose our salvation if we do not worship unigod? No, we will not lose our salvation.

If those who do not worship unigod will go to heaven, then why should man waste his time and energy in worshipping this unigod, when he can indulge in carnal hedonistic lifestyle?

The depraved mind of Universalists posits salvation for everyone – all and sundry – even those who do not worship unigod. In other words, unigod, who supposedly saves all people, declares himself to be unworthy of worship.

Worthy of Abuse

If you are unaware of Richard Dawkins’ intense abuse (an act of evil) of the living God, please read the endnote.1 (Proponents of Historic Christianity believe that Prof. Richard Dawkins, the bulldog of Atheism, will not go to heaven, if he does not repent of his sins and accept Christ the Lord as his Savior. The God of Historic Christianity is a holy God and in HIM is no sin, so sin cannot coexist with God.)

Thanks to Dawkins, we can now turn the tables.

Please brace yourself for an unmitigated and an indecent assault on unigod. The unigod is an evil, corrupt, depraved, putrid, brainless blockhead; he is a nonsensical dummy, foolish idiot, insanely ignoramus dolt, a nincompoop, and a senseless monkey. Anyone can mock and thoroughly disrespect unigod.2

Despite these abuses on unigod, Universalists claim that unigod will still save me!

Unworthy of Emulation

Just as how parents are emulated by children, God should be emulated by HIS disciples.

Universalists claim that all people will be saved despite their good or horrendous nature. If their god unconditionally accepts abuses, should not the Universalists unconditionally accept abuse from others?

If the Universalists fail to accept horrendous abuses upon themselves or their families and friends, they intuitively expose their opposition to or the limitation of their own god!

Historic Christianity asserts Christlikeness in the believers of Christ (Romans 8: 29 et al.). This is not a mere fact from the realm of the spiritual, but from the realm of the physical as well. Christians are called to bear fruit and much fruit (John 15).

The contentment and joy of a parent is directly proportional to the physical and behavioral resemblance of their child. If a child resembles the goodness of the parent, the parent will be greatly joyful and contented.

But in the case of Universalism, there is no resemblance of unigod in the lives of its disciples. The children of the alleged unigod exist in reality, but when the child is to resemble the parent, the children of unigod do not resemble their god, for their god cannot be resembled.

Conclusion

Universalism is a medievally mystical belief, bordering on insanity. The alleged god who admits all people into heaven is imaginary, and resides only in the depraved minds of the Universalists.

God cannot be unholy, evil, unjust, and unmindful of sins. Only an evil and an unjust being will be unmindful of sins. Moreover, a god who accepts and agrees with abuse of any intensity is a god without perfection and holiness. A being with such deplorable attributes is not God. In fact, God, as a maximally great being, cannot possess such appalling attributes.

Even man’s intrinsic dignity and self-worth prevents him from agreeing and accepting to abuses of any form or size. So a god who is awfully comfortable with abuses to the extent of supporting and welcoming evil is an evil god that resides only in the fantasies of certain minds.

Therefore, we reasonably claim that there is no unigod, and that universalism is nothing but a grand illusion.

Ralph #fundie behindthebadge.net

[In response to a 14 year old girl contemplating suicide and wondering if God cares about her:]

I have a couple of tough questions for you. First, what do you think you are being saved from? I ask that because your message to me appears to be saying that you think God is saving you from having a bad day. That is not what Salvation is all about. What we are saved from when we are saved is from the sentence of death imposed on us by a Holy God whom we have sinned against. Jesus died for our sins, so that we could live with God eternally. He did not die to take away our minor struggles here in this life.

I don't mean to belittle what you are going through, but you have to get your eyes focused on the right things. If you look at this life with eyes focused on being happy, you never will be. But if you look at this life with eternity in your eyes, you will realize that this life doesn't really mean anything, it is just a wisp of smoke which is soon blown away by the wind. What is important in this life is witnessing to others so that they too can live for eternity with God instead of spending eternity in hell.

Stephen Shaw #conspiracy #ufo #magick #mammon amazon.com

5D is the Fifth Dimension. Discover ethereal doorways hidden in the fabric of space-time. Who is the Time Lord? Who are the Arcturians, Pleiadeans and Greys? Who gave birth to the Buddha? Who killed John Fitzgerald Kennedy? What is the origin and purpose of Area 51 (aka Paradise Ranch)? How deep down the rabbit hole are you willing to go? My books provide a mystical and connected pathway toward knowledge, peace and joy. 5D is an intellectually-challenging story and first book in the advanced trilogy 5D - Star Child - The Tribe.

Stephen Shaw is a Spiritual Teacher and Author. His bestselling books and seminars raise individual consciousness and contribute to spiritual awakening. Stephen has travelled across the world, encountering African, Peruvian and Mexican shamans, Tibetan monks, global enlightened masters, sensual tantrikas and divine healers. All this has culminated in radical personal transformation, highest spiritual teachings, access to the multi-dimensions, and immersion in the Light. Stephen Shaw’s mystical books reveal the secrets for deep love, profound healing, joyful living and spiritual transcendence

Twocents #psycho #ableism wbur.org

I am concerned that our society (and I don’t just mean parents and teachers, both overworked and under-compensated for their efforts, but our society as a whole, all of us combined) is producing a generation of youth transfixed by their own navels. Of course they are, we encourage them to be! They don’t see the suffering of the world around them, only their unique brand of suffering. And all this talk of chemical imbalance in the brain and no personal responsibility infuriates me. Research has shown that talk therapy changes brain chemistry as well as any drug, and this to me means we do have power over our own thoughts. When I heard the hushed “oh, so tragic” and the community depression hanging like a cloud, I was desperate to hear some anger, too, and not just at parents/ teachers/ drug pushers, but at the youths themselves. So let me be the voice of anger. I am not talking here of the tragic situation of a person who is in unmanageable pain due to some terrible, incurable disease, that is a different circumstance. But let me tell you, if you are a teen contemplating suicide for emotional reasons, what you are doing is not romantic, it is not self-sacrificing (just a waste of yourself), and it is not thoughtful. Your act is an act of extreme violence against the very people who love you and who put so much effort and time into your well-being, and whom you love so little, it seems. Maybe you enjoy the thought of your friends’ hurting after you? Oh, yes, they will hurt badly, but eventually they will get over it and lead normal, productive lives. Get a hold of yourself, look outside of yourself for a second and find some meaning in your life by helping others in need. There is plenty you can do to help, but I suggest you start at the menial jobs first, because these need to be done, too. And, oh, go visit some poor places in the world with your parents’ money and see how other people live and suffer and work through their suffering, before you make any more plans to die.

Junon #sexist islamicboard.com

Salaam

Another comment piece on the damage feminism has done to western society. Lessons to be learned.

Why Men (and Women) Hate Feminism

A while ago I received an e-mail from one of my female readers. She was being honest and polite, but wanted to know precisely what I had against feminism. It was along the lines of "feminism is about the equal treatment of women, so what is so bad about that?" However, like many other women, I don't believe she was fully aware as to just how far the feminist movement has gone, co-opting women and how far from the truth it is. Thus, I believe it would be to everybody's benefit to explain in detail why most readers here in the Capposphere and elsewhere are against feminism (and to see if I'm missing any other reasons).

Reason #1 - Myopic View of the Sexes

If there is a "primary" reason I would have to say this is it. Feminism started demanding changes in regards to women, with no consideration as to what would happen to the other half of society, ie - men. They also did not think it through and consider children as well. It was a very female-centered approach and nobody considered (let alone, cared) how actions/changes/etc. in women would affect the rest of society. You still see this today based on the policies advocated by feminism in that it is all about women. A secondary concern is given to the children (more often than not, using children as a means to extract government resources), and maybe a tertiary concern is given to men.

Reason #2 - Lies About Human Nature

A close second is the ludicrous concept that men and women are not just equal, but the same. Women can do what men can do. There are no biological differences. And any difference is viewed as sexism or oppression.

The problem is these differences are what makes men and women great. Men like women. Women like men. Men don't like manly women, and women don't like girly men. We enjoy the difference. All feminism has done is ruined the love lives of millions of other women (and men's as well) lying to youth about "being a sensitive 90's man"or a "strong independent woman." That men are "shallow" and "cheap" for liking long legs and big boobs, and that any man who is worth his weight in salt will "like you for you." Women now ignore these basic biological facts about male sexuality, even mocking and scorning them, and fail to attract men.

These lies about the "exact sameness" of men and women also destroy a vital component of our economy and society - the division of labor. Though nobody is ordained or condemned to play these roles, traditionally the wife would stay home, while the husband would work. This allowed for not only better families, but better reared children. It also allowed for happier people (as men are predisposed to go out and work and women are predisposed to stay at home and rear a family). Neither role was inferior to the other. Both were vital, but it was feminism that lied to millions of younger women telling them the grass was greener on the other side. The result has been an increase in divorce, less stable family, less financially stable families, and problem children incapable of becoming functioning adults in society. This has also resulted in women being less happy.

Reason #3 - False Claims of Sexism

The thoroughly debunked "wage gap" is getting mighty tiresome. It is a false argument used only to gain "victim" status by feminists to result in legislation that unfairly benefits women. Affirmative action is nothing more than discrimination against men. Most men resent this

Reason #4 - Not Pulling Your Weight

The wage gap, however, does prove something. Women, for all their clamor of independence and "what you can do I can do better" are failing miserably and only achieving about 76% of what men do. This in spite of all the handicaps of affirmative action, a media that is always supportive, and limitless educational and government programs. Of course, the wage gap is not 100% "proof women aren't pulling their own weight." Many women still take on traditional roles and rear children, some drop out of the work force to take care of their families. But when it comes to majoring in rigorous studies, producing things of economic value, and being economically-contributing members of society, they disproportionately fail. They account for more government workers than men, they account for easier subjects in college than men, and they are nowhere to be seen in dangerous or risky jobs. Women on the whole are NOT equal when it comes to economic production.

Reason #5 - Poor Stewardship of the Right to Vote

This is more of an opinion, but I believe it is an opinion held by the majority of men (and surprisingly, women) who hate feminism (so you may not agree the the political opinion, but it IS a reason some people hate feminism). In short, feminists have been poor stewards of their right to vote. I say this because they have consistently as a group voted for more government and less freedom since given the right to vote. I believe this is because it is in women's nature to be more caring than men, and thus tend to vote for "nicer" things. Children, health care, education, etc. However, "feelings" and "caring" have no place in government finances. That requires passionless thought and consideration, research, mathematics, and an understanding of history and economics. It also requires an appreciation for the freedom granted to us by our forefathers and an understanding of the role government was intended to play. Feminists have proven ignorant about these topics and vote with their hearts, not their heads (and more recently, just for plain politics).

Reason #6 - Replacing Men With the State

Closely related to #5 is that feminists and feminism advocates essentially replacing the husband and father with the state. This is abundantly clear when you see how much money and support single mothers get not to mention this macabre desire by some feminists to eliminate men from the birthing process altogether. Not only does this take away the two most important things in a man's live (his theoretical would-be wife and children), but essentially forces men to compete against the government as a much-better financed suitor. Not only do men lose out on love and family, any children brought into this world via Daddy Government are missing a real father and will suffer incredibly later in life.

Reasons #7 - Hypocrisy

While most hard core feminists will claim they're "independent," they're anything but. They are usually the first to have some kind of make-work government job, some kind of professorship nobody asked for, or begging and pleading for donations to some kind of "activist group." They typically produce nothing of value and require the state to transfer other people's money to create jobs for them. They even point out, point blank, they want more government money for them and/or their children in government policy. And while, yes, there may be that one feminist computer engineer, the vast majority of them are hopelessly dependent.

Reason #8 - Backlash for the Ruination of Women/Men/Lives

In general and summarizing some of the above, most people haven't sat down to think things through to the point they can articulate why the are so frustrated or angry with the opposite sex, let alone what role feminism played in this angst. But both sexes are painfully aware of the lower quality men and women of today. Modern day western women are on the whole unmarriageable, and modern day western men are no where near capable of being a provider or protector. As they ponder these things, however, they will start to realize just what a bunch of BS and lies they were fed in their youth. Lies about the sexes, the roles people were supposed to play, how the sexes were to interact with one another, and what people "should and should not like." As people age, they will see the best thing in their lives (namely, members of the opposite sex) ruined and spoiled, and consequentially the quality of their own lives ruined as well. Men now have to settle for women they're not attracted to, women have to settle for men who are effeminate and clueless, all because a bunch of women in the 1970's were miserable with their lives and (as far as I can tell) merely wanted everybody else to be miserable like them. When people put two and two together, they will see it was feminism that warped and thus ruined this aspect of their lives and they will get angry.

Those are the 8 primary reasons I could come up with. I think there may be more, but at minimum I hope it debunks feminism as simply being the "equal treatment of women" and clears up some things on both sides of the aisle.

lighthouse #fundie rr-bb.com

[Wait until you read the final paragraph... these sick fuckers look forward to unsaved children being so frightened by being "left behind" that they contemplate suicide. What the FUCK?!]

Weeping Mothers Cry 'Where Is My Baby?'

Every news service in the world has now reported millions of missing babies. Thousands of hospitals all over the earth report that every single baby in the maternity ward is missing. At the very moment the world experienced the return of Christ - a strange silence settled on thousands of homes and hospitals. Mothers who one moment were feeding hungry little children were suddenly left clutching at air. Not only are the babies missing but also millions of children under seven years of age.

One observer has been quoted as saying - "Jesus once said - Suffer the little children to come unto me, for of such is the kingdom of God. Now it is very evident that Jesus has called all the little children to himself once and for all."

If you have a missing child - or say missing person in your family - Do not call the police. There is nothing they can do.


Thousands Attempt Suicide

The worst aftermath of the great mysterious disappearance last nigh is the horrible wave of suicide attempts being made by thousands. In most cases those who are attempting to end it all have at one time or another had a chance to get right with God. They are those who have heard the message of His coming over and over again and have grown hard to its truth. Thousands of young people woke up this morning to find parents missing. Mothers were gone - brothers and sisters were missing. While many others were surprised by the 'rapture' - they seemed to know instantly what had happened. When the full impact of the coming of Jesus dawned on them and when they realized they had thrown aside so many chances to repent and get ready - they became desperate. Remorse began driving them to seek a way out. Many have been driven completely out of their minds as they sit in their bedrooms sobbing - "I'm left behind - I'm left behind - There is no hope."

John Ladder #fundie theologyonline.com

"Atheists tend to be selfish bastards, as we see clearly in many of the posts here. Hence the tendency of encountering athiests as single non-parents.

You're missing the point regarding the lack of "controls". If you eliminated the married folks from consideration (or separated them), there would be a stronger bias for suicide among atheists who have no family.

This 2004 study isn't dated at all, and remains quite interesting since there have been no other studies.

How laughable it is to read the bravado of the atheists here. Their overconfidence will not serve them well in the end.

It's quite simple: The typical atheist could care less about God or their fellow man. The rejection of God leaves him with nothing in the moment of severe mental crisis. Having nothing, he wants to become nothing. Persistent doubt now culminates in despairing agony. But there is no God to pull him out. Ignorance was bliss, but now it becomes excruciating pain. Once strong in his freedom, he now finds himself pitifully weak.

In denying God, he denies spirituality. Since he denies his soul and the possibility of spiritual assistance from God, it is quite simply unavailable to him as he contemplates suicide.

There is nothing to lean on, since the atheist denies the Power that established him and sustains him. He's on his own. But the darkness is black. Black. It is cold and terribly lonely.

This is the sickness unto death. But death is not the end. There shall be a reckoning."

PhoebeDodgedShelby #sexist reddit.com

Literally everything to do with having a victim complex and dragging men down off their pedestals and defeating the patriarchy. Like it's a fucking war now, except even the WOMEN don't envision themselves as strong enough to conquer the evils of masculinity. So literally you've NOT been oppressed, you've just realised you're shitter in a lot of ways than men so men need to behave less awesomely to compensate for your shitness. I say this as a 34 year old woman; FUCK feminism as it manifests today. I've literally contemplated suicide to get off this earth because nothing makes sense anymore.

Please don't quit this game yet. The earth needs smart people like you.

Nobody listens though. I've been called a 'traitor to my gender' for merely pointing out that false sexual assault claims by women DO happen. Just that is enough to cast me as either plain evil or just not 'smart enough' to realise all the ways my life has been inhibited by men; despite over three decades of personal experience to the contrary.

You can't reason with that level of vitriolic fanaticism.

I thought that was third wave, where’s the distinction

3rd wave = equality feminism, still irritating with the conflation of equal opportunity with equal outcome but still, generally geared towards positive social outcome for all, LGBT equality and acceptance, women should have the chance to earn the same income and status as any man

4th wave = JUSTICE feminism - FUCK MEN, MEN ARE TRASH, women deserve REPARATIONS above and beyond equality as punitive damages for all the horrid things men have done. The patriarchy must be crushed, men have NO inherent societal value or place beyond that of oppressors. The time of WOMEN has arrived.

LOL what? Women never envisioned themselves like that. They envisioned being "empowered." This is a code word meaning "I want other people to do yucky things for me exactly like before, but I'll pretend that they aren't men. We'll just take male taxpayer dollars instead of our husbands' dollars to subsidize our shitty career choices and also make up a zillion rules so that things in yucky penisy workland are less penisy and our feelings don't get hurt."

So you agree with me...?

I don't think 2nd wavers or women in general were ever "oppressed." There was just real social change back then. So yeah, I agree in that it's mostly just amped up man-hate now. They want the whole world to be vagina-friendly. Everywhere. But the victimhood thing was always there. The difference is that the modern snowflakes are angry that DESPITE the excessive feminization of the workplace (huge HR bureaucracy, parallel justice systems) earning money or accomplishing anything worthwhile outside of the home STILL requires being "masculine." The 2nd wavers were grateful just for the chance to act more masculine occasionally without becoming social outcasts. There were still wars. Crime rates were high. Cars had no power steering or brakes, and broke down often. Cell phones did not exist. A nuclear holocaust could break out at any moment. The world was a more dangerous place. They had a certain respect for masculinity and how it deals with the real physical world.

Agreed. That's really what saddens me now; if anything I see a world that needs more strong, honest, guiding male influence, especially within the younger generations. Instead this hyper feminised shit is ruining society and morality.

Various incels #pedo #sexist incels.co

RE: [RageFuel] Made an r/amithesoyhole bait post about not wanting my 14 year old daughter to railed. Reddit once again reveals themselves as pedophiles.

(AlexanderTheGreat11)

The comment of that guy saying he was banging his gf everyday after school when he was 13(feelsree)

(Words2_live_bye)

ragefuel. These same people then argue and call you a pedo when you say you wanna smash a 13 - 17 year old. JFL
girls in this age range DO have sex drive and desire for sex.

(Edmund_Kemper)

AITA is a shitty subreddit of retarded faggots. They think it’s ok for for 12 year olds to look at porn and use sex toys but they get mad at a 40 year old man dating a 20 year old foid. That subreddit’s morals are retarded

(Hate_my_life)

To all our reddit friends:
Please cool it with the hate. Incels.co is a forum of peace. Look at this disgusting display of misogyny and toxic masculinity in a pile of pancakes, batman!

image

This does not surprise me at all. The language is so creepy and weird. "I immediately reacted negatively and told my wife to keep our daughter away from these boys when I'm not around." (where the heck are you going?) and "I instructed my wife that our daughter doesn't need to be engaging in sexual activity at all. This dude has never been in a relationship before and it shows. Also lmao just because he didn't get any at 13 he thinks other boys don't? When I was in middle school I knew dudes that were getting head when they were 12.

Nobody has sex at 13 (Soyface emojis). It's normal to be a virgin to your late 20s (Soyface emojis).

(Subhuman Currycel)

The comment of that guy saying he was banging his gf everyday after school when he was 13

I can’t believe him and me are males from the same species fuck my life. Remember a few nanomenters of DNA all it takes.

(Gymcelled)

The comment of that guy saying he was banging his gf everyday after school when he was 13

Our lives are so different to what they could have been, had we been born with the right face/height.

(Mainländer)

Those people think it's ok for your 14 yo daughter to be gangbanged by Chads her age and if you have anything to say against it your a misogynist, but if someone older, even if 17 or something, even peck kisses her, he's a rapist. I wish they were just a handful of retards, but tons of people think this way nowadays. It's mind-boggling.

Just the other day I read someone on IT saying about a 14 yo hypothetically having sex with another 14 yo: "as long as it's consensual, it's ok - oh, and btw, 14 yos can't consent". Do these people even stop for a minute to analyze how they think, or at the very least what they write?

(ScornedStoic)

This is what I don't get. It's okay for a 14 year old to be a slut for other 14 y.o.s but if I want to provide for one and genuinely make her happy in a monogamous marriage (preferably virginal) why am I a monster?

If you want to do stuff that will make society less degenerate and feminist you're a monster, basically.

I just want to be left alone if for some reason in some universe I was able to get a jb to fall in love with me. Is that so much to ask?

(Wizard32)

Teen girls are not prepubescent, so using attraction to them to call people pedophiles is a bunch of anti-male feminist propaganda.

"Hebephile" if you must, toward those who prefer them (noting that inclusion is not preference, of course) but the idea that we should label this as some kind of paraphilia is wrong, because it isn't any more fetishistic than preferring a specific sex/gender or preferring a specific ethnicity/race or preferring beautiful to ugly, having a height preference, a smell preference, a hair color preference, etc.

Preferences (particularly slight ones) don't need medical terms for them when there isn't anything unhealthy about them. Especially since it leads to the demonizing of slight preferences and implying they are dramatic fixations when they usually are not.

Calling teens "children" is misleading. Yes, modern legal classification of "minor" is synonymous with that, but in general practice we use terms like "adolescent" rather than "child" or "kid" to refer to people in-between being an infant and an adult.

This type of language is used to minimize the maturity/intelligence/experience of teens, to ignore their biological readiness, to demonize normal male attraction to healthy fertile females.

If you buy into thinking 14 is too young, you're just mentally cucking yourself (poor biddy) as a coping mechanism to deal with being denied the freshest pussy by our present matriarchy.

(nazianime)

Honestly an older male would be a better companion for a young girl. Theoretically if a male has a high paying job, his own home and transportation and still has time in the day left. It would be ideal, because a man that is a college educated and already has life experience can be a treasure trove of information. This would only work if she was committed to learn and respect. But parents don’t teach that.

But you are a monster according to IT for trying to provide a show of real respect and commitment to a girl.

fschmidt #fundie coalpha.org

[Hyperlinks in original]

The big news this week is that two Islamist gunmen killed twelve people at the French "satirical" weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo. The world is almost universally outraged by this attack. But not me.

What exactly is Charlie Hebdo? It's in French and I don't read French, but I think a google image search conveys the basic idea.

http://www.google.com/search?q=Charlie+Hebdo&tbm=isch

From this, we see that "satire" is really just a polite way of saying ridicule. This is a liberal newspaper that ridicules religion and whatever else liberals don't approve of. We can see a similar style of cartoon by googling "nazi jewish cartoons".

http://www.google.com/search?q=nazi+jewish+cartoons&tbm=isch

There isn't much difference except that the Nazis had somewhat better taste than Liberals do. Of course the targets are different, but that doesn't matter, the concept is the same.

Should this kind of thing be tolerated? Whatever the answer, the answer should be consistent. If you are going to tolerate Charlie Hebdo then you should also tolerate Nazi anti-Jewish cartoons. Is France consistent? Please read about Hate speech laws in France. According to these laws, this kind of thing is "hate speech" and should not be tolerated. And in fact Muslims took Charlie Hebdo to court based on this law and lost. This is liberal hypocrisy at its finest. For a liberal, hate speech is only speech against something liberals like. Hate speech against what liberals hate isn't hate speech at all, according to liberals, it is free speech.

So let us summarize what a liberal is. A liberal is a hypocrite who ridicules opposing viewpoints, who is intolerant and legally censors opposing viewpoints, who is totally closed-minded and is unwilling to even listen to opposing viewpoints, and who come out in mass protest when their hypocrisy is threatened. In short, liberals are scum. But does this justify killing them?

On an intellectual level, this is a difficult question. But on an emotional, it is easy. I am filled with joy whenever I hear that liberals have been killed. How could I possibly feel any other way? I have an opposing view to liberals, just as these Muslims do, so the liberals have relentlessly ridiculed and censored me. They are totally incapable of respecting or tolerating opposing viewpoints like mine. Every interaction I have with liberals causes me to hate them more. How could I wish for anything other than their death?

On an intellectual level, I believe in free speech and live and let live. So in theory, liberals should be allowed to be scum and should be left in peace. But this only applies as long as liberals follow the same rules. When the liberal West interferes in the internal affairs of Muslim countries, Muslims have every right to attack back. The argument that these are innocent citizens of the West is absurd. It is precisely propaganda like Charlie Hebdo that causes the public to choose governments that attack Islam. So Charlie Hebdo is a justified target. My only criticism is that while France is quite intolerant internally to Muslims, it is not particularly active against Muslim countries. So Muslims who don't like France should just leave. The same cannot be said for America which relentlessly sticks its nose into the affairs of other nations. So attacks against America are entirely justified.

I am not Muslim, so this is not my problem. So while violence against liberals appeals to me emotionally, I have no intellectual reason to do this and I won't. I will just live my life in peace, and take pleasure in any news of violence against the liberals who I hate.

Sowing & Reaping #conspiracy realjewnews.com

It’s probably apparent to most Jew-wise Christians that the Zionists are setting themselves up for a horrible fall with their many evils.

Our government and military are supposed to defend its citizens and its borders from invading hordes. But the Jews have their puppet politicians using military bases to aid and abet the invaders.

The Jews banish Christianity from schools and government, instigate wars, migrant floods, perversion, LGBT, pornography, transgender toilets, riots, race wars, stock market crashes, depressions, recessions, 9/11, and practically all that is evil.

The Protocols of Zion explain how the Jews plan for these evils to weaken the gentile nations and make them so miserable that the world will be eager for the “King of the Jews” to take over the government of the world and change the misery into joy.

God seems to have different plans.

Prophecy in 2 Thess 2 which says the “man of sin” will be revealed seems to mean that Zionism will be exposed, that people will finally see who is behind the evil worked against them.

Toroidaljoints #fundie reddit.com

This is not a life, but some kind of nonstop humiliation

Is this supposed to be funny? Is it a joke? Even the most sadistic fuck couldn't come up with something like this. I can't even begin to describe how perfectly every minute of this life has been calculated to cause total demoralization and anguish. If this was a game of chess, you have only a king on one square while all other squares on the board have an enemy queen. You are checkmated in every way possible. You are checkmated in ways you didn't even know you could be checkmated.

If you are reading this you have been devastatingly humiliated already multiple times today. Did you take a shit today? There is very little worse than having to take a shit. You literally have feces inside of your body that you have to expel, but some of them get stuck to you, so you have to wipe feces off of your body. Can you imagine anything more degrading? I've just said it and I'll say it again: Even the most sadistic fuck couldn't come up with something like this. So where did this absurdity come from? Every moment I wish it was just a bad dream, or a bad lsd trip, that will eventually go away. I am fucking owned, pwned and thrashed by life every moment of every day, there is no respite, it's like a superintelligence calculated the most perfect way possible of crushing someone. Am I living in hell? If so, I am really fucking sorry for what I did to deserve this.

Even childhood is supposed to be your tutorial mode, but if you aren't born a failed start, (starving to death as a kid, which happens a lot) then your childhood, if it's the best possible one, with no abuse, only serves to maximum bluepill you so you enter adult life totally unprepared with a rosy colored view that life then delights in crushing to pieces. And you weren't even intelligent enough as a child to enjoy your childhood as much as you should. If your childhood sucks, then you don't become hardened and tough like you deserve to be, instead, a shitty childhood turns to a shitty adulthood and then it only gets more distorted and dysphoric from there. Speaking of being utterly unprepared, how am I so completely unprepared just to exist? My thin, frail body can barely support it's own weight in this gravity. Seriously, don't we have millions of years of evolution that should have gotten us ready for this? Millions of years of evolution, and the summers are too fucking hot and the winters are too fucking cold. You would think that with millions of years of evolution we would be able to handle the ambient fucking conditions of our planet? Well, think again, fucktard. You are born powerless. You are also born wanting things you can't have, and then your brain hurts you by making you depressed when you have no possible way of satisfying its impossible demands.

One figures that with foids controlling evolution, we end up hopelessly weak and stupid creatures that are doomed to madness and failure. If high iq men controlled evolution, we would be 5th dimensional energy beings by now, but no, everything is perfect horror and thus the most unqualified things that can possibly exist- women, end up controlling the most important of all processes. It's like having a baby as the pilot of your plane.

This is the worst possible reality, yet somehow paradoxically complete with still having the opportunity to get twice as bad as it is at any moment. Humiliation day in and day out, coping is humiliation, roping it obscene levels of humiliation. There is no way out. There is nothing more cucked than having been born, and being alive. Even now I can think of hundreds and hundreds of ways in which life is wiping the floor with me. BrazilianSigma get a job.

Win Worley #fundie hbcdelivers.s439.sureserver.com

Perhaps you have noticed that people very often look ten to twenty years younger in their casket than when alive. I believe that reason for this to be the complete relaxation of all facial muscles when the spirits promoting strain and tension leave the body.

A demon called Ugliness is found in many persons. His job is to harass his host by continuously stating the he/she is repulsive and ugly. Ordinarily these spirits are born in a person or enter at such an early age that they seem always to have been there. Even handsome men and very beautiful women can be tormented cruelly by these lying spirits. Self Hatred and Insecurity are found teamed with Ugliness to increase the victim’s misery.

Eugenicist incels.co

Stormfrontcels are mostly people who got their feelings hurt in ghetto/lowclass areas, but if got woke up call from snooty whites, they'd be here.

The real allspanning denominator of human misery comes from getting shit from the LOOKISM line of judgment, rather than the racial line of judgment.
Stormfront is for bluepillers, with very faint shades of red/purple pills. Mostly about jewish control, and black crime rates, but the underlying sentiment that excludes white peopel from the equation is also there. It's why I've been more passionate posting here than anywhere white.
The hipster/hick/most normie white circles are as much a purveyance as anything nonwhites do to those on the mediocre middle range or lower on social hierarchal class. The real latitude of relevance is not white vs. black, at least not in the first world, but between good looking/ high value, and ugly/ low value.

The biggest wake up calls for bullied people turned stormfrontcels are
-rednecks and how they act almost as depraved as niggers/ only valuing masculinity, size, intimidation. Often more % of the country is a sty because of methbath rednecks than nigs
-white foids, their liberal/ hypocritical trendy tendencies, and genetic predisposition to liberalism. WHILE ALSO not having the sense of self accountability to be consisten with their beliefs and be true to their hypocrisy in preferring chads, and yet hating "privilege" of all sorts.
--upper class whites and their complicitness for poor/ average whites to be bullied, be happy clappy hipsters who judge you based on how happy, high value, presentable you are (superficial snooty) and ignore social issues
-Most people who are stormfrontcels were hurt and bullied and most whites, especially stuck up ones, actually encourage the same thing, only in a more superficial, gaudy, materialistic way, and every asian (or majority) want to leave the ghettos and go into white areas, and only exception is if they have anxiety.

Matthew Gregory McLaughlin #fundie matthewgregorymclaughlin.wordpress.com

The ignorant notion that the Lord Jesus Christ was somehow silent or ambivalent about Sodomites is a fiction manufactured by liars with a bad conscience.

Christ’s animosity toward Sodomites was so ‘extreme’ that he professed an almost impatient desire to burn them all up.

The warning that Jesus Christ will return to burn up his enemies with unquenchable fire is repeatedly connected to the example of Sodom, the import of which is absolutely unmistakable: Sodomites will infect the world in the end of days, and Christ will return in his wrath for the very purpose of burning them in the torments of eternal fire.

Consider the following examples of ‘invidious discrimination’ and ‘hate speech’ of our Creator Jesus Christ toward sex-perverts:

#1 – Jesus said marriage is only between a man and woman:

“And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, 5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? 6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.” (Matthew 19:4-6)(see also, Mark 10:6-9)

#2 – Jesus affirmed observance of the Old Testament Law (viz., Lev. 20:13):

“¶ Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:17-19)

#3 – Jesus explained that the purpose of his return in the future will be to burn up the world’s sodomites with flaming fire:

“¶ I am come to send fire on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled? 50 But I have a baptism to be baptized with; and how am I straitened till it be accomplished! 51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:.” (Luke 12:49-51)

“Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; 29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. 30 Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.” (Luke 17:28-30)

#4 – Jesus warned the friends of Sodomites of getting the same treatment:

“Remember Lot’s wife.” (Luke 17:32)

#5 – Jesus repeatedly said he would return to burn up the wicked:

“19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.” (Matthew 7:19)

“As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. 41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.” (Matthew 13:40-42)

“Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire. 9 And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire.” (Matthew 18:8-9)

# 6 -Jesus’ disciples Peter and Jude – who lived with Christ and knew all his teachings – explained that the Sodomites weren’t doomed for being ‘unfriendly’ – they were damned for being sex perverts:

“Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. 8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.” (Jude 1:7-8)

“And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly; 7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked: 8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;) 9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:” (2 Peter 2:6-9)

+

Those passages describe Sodomites as those who engage in ‘filthy’ ‘unlawful’ ‘fornication’ – and they make it crystal clear that the same such perverts will be burned to ashes in the most horrifying manner imaginable by the Lord Jesus Christ.

Still think Jesus was non-committal on the issue of destroying Sodomites? If so, please donate your frontal lobe to science so they can study the densest matter in the universe.

Better-informed Sodomites don’t display their stupidity as recklessly as to make the bizarre claim of taking a sworn enemy like the Lord Jesus Christ as their benefactor. That’s a phenomenon reserved for the worst of the worst – the most shameless and blind of the entire bunch.

Degenerates should claim for themselves a moral relativist like Buddha, or some a worldly philosopher that tried to deny the judgment to come. Call upon whatever gods you want – but don’t call upon Jesus Christ, unless you repent.

Hating evil is Jesus Christ’s eternal joy:

“Thou lovest righteousness, and hatest wickedness: therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.” (Psalms 45:7)

“For thou art not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness: neither shall evil dwell with thee. 5 The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity.” (Psalms 5:4-5)

“For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.” (Revelation 22:15)

Mish #fundie rr-bb.com

#5: *~there is no anger or any desire for vengeance in this thought~* I'd really like to witness once or twice, the reaction/response of those who committed their lives to removing God and anything that related to Him from our society.

Those who fought to remove God from: the Pledge of Allegiance- our American currency-showing the Ten Commandments on/in buildings-the pledge our military take when being sworn into the service-History books-saying the term "Christmas"-all prayer spoken aloud-and all the other millions of examples made public through our news media.
*~I would be interested in their reaction when~ the reality, the truth, the power and the eternal magnitude of FACT that GOD does indeed exist in glory and triumph over all HIS Creation, now and for all eternity...as it sinks into their minds, that they were totally, fully and completely WRONG.

#4: I long to gaze upon God's perfect Kingdom; to absorb all that He created for His children and know true peace that will last forever!

#3 1/2: Being reunited with all my family and friends (pets, too!!!) who have gone to our Lord before me. We truly serve an awesome God! HOW could we ever thank God for all He has done for us? Oh, how I love God and yearn for the day He calls me home to be with Him forever!! What joy that brings to me in 'this' life!

#3: I long to be reunited with my Daddy; he died during my junior year at university ('86) and I still feel the loss of him within my heart. And I anxiously await meeting the baby I lost (4 months within me); and I could never again become pregnant after that miscarriage.

#2: Too finally experience the perfect new body God has in store for each of us. To forever be free from chronic pain, fatigue and health issues; how fabulous it will be to run and not grow weary, to join the chorus in praising God, to be free from sin and the impact it had during our life on earth! The wonders of heaven will never end and to spend eternity with our Lord and Savior is the most glorious gift imaginable!

#1: My strongest desire is to curl-up on God's lap; soak in His peace that passes all understanding, His amazing love...and somehow express my complete and total gratitude/thanks/appreciation for giving me the gift of eternal life with Him! I just want to snuggle in, rest and absorb everything that is our Lord and Savior! Ahh~I so look forward to that indescribable day!!

Justinian #fundie the-spearhead.com

Women had better learn how to fight for “their” rights.

When I mean fight, I font mean protest marches and lawsuits.

They better be ready to do all the fighting, bleeding, and dying.

They have taken everything away from men.

Adding up the suicide-inducing misery of the 9/11 wars, the unwillingness of politicians to win despite an overwhelming firepower advantage, and the treatment of men as second class citizens; I don’t expect many men to volunteer in the future.

I still remember all the patriotic fervor following the 9/11 attacks of all the young, niave men willing to sacrifice themselves. That goodwill was spit on and squandered by the Washington elite.

I can’t ever imagine a repeat of that level self-sacrifice given what has happened in the intervening 11 years.

The most likely scenario of how this whole women in the military experiment will play out is that women will hog more and more of the resources and training during peacetime.

When there is another true national emergency, all of the women who received training, pay, education, and other benefits from being in the military will be excused from their obligation to go into the field and got shot at.

In their place, legions of men with no training at all will be conscripted to be cannon fodder and disposed of for “the greater good.”

skimmingway #quack #elitist #crackpot wehuntedthemammoth.com

A man can, in fact, live off a diet of raw meat. They have done it before, and there presently exist men who are doing it at this very moment. Now, I only take my meat raw on rare (haha) occasion, but I applaud any man who can eat meat like this regularly – a fine display of old world, masculine zest if there ever was one.

——————————————————————————-

I am defending a WAY OF LIFE from the verbal slings and arrows of ineffectual intellectuals and other assorted effete pointy-headed snobs who are, in a likelihood, more concerned with the aesthetic dimension behind consuming raw meat than they are with the actual nature of the act in itself. The very thought of some betesticled man’s man, oozing testosterone and animal magnetism as he bites into his dinner with ursine hunger just makes your kind go flailing back into your drawing rooms, fan in hand and couch in perfect position for you to faint on as you contemplate what “horrors” have just vexed your delicate little nerves. This whole thing has little to do with the actual health of the men in question, it boils down to the fact that they reject your Bismarckian pretensions and make a mockery of your obsessive desire to use whatever “facts” you deem appropriate to impose order on people you see as your inferiors, you people who show up to a boxing match with a Jeopardy buzzer. You can’t take the man out of the man.

___________________________________________
I will not be getting E. Coli, however much it might please you for the inverse to be true, because, as I’ve delineated above, men who have properly trained their immune systems are unlikely to acquire any sort of lethal or exceptionally cumbersome malady. The safety rules which you have tried to foist upon me with your condescending wiles were made for more delicate sorts of people, such as the one you see in the mirror. I will not likely be getting ANY kind of disease to “own the libs” I will own them precisely by doing that which they insist, from their ivory tower perches, is impossible for me and my kind to do. Keep chortling, Nagglefart.


Carl Winters #fundie quora.com

Garbage. I know what youre trying to do recruiting more weak gullible people with your mind control. Lemme tell you something. I know who runs your church. Not everyone is stupid here. We know what you stand for. There is many soldiers of GOD, true bold and righteous men out there exposing your garbage and your church and your teachings of Alister Crowley, Lavey , magick and withcraft and satanic ritual abuse. Jesus defeated your weak master and no matter what you do and what you believe you will lose in the end. You might get away with a lot here on earth but you will burn in hell for an eternity , Where there is weeping, moaning, gnashing of teeth, sorrow, pain an misery for 24/7 YOU BETTER repent you devil.

Isaiah 5:20–24 (KJV)

20

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

21Woe unto [them that are] wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!

22 Woe unto [them that are] mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink:

23

Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him!

24

Therefore as the fire devoureth the stubble, and the flame consumeth the chaff, [so] their root shall be as rottenness, and their blossom shall go up as dust: because they have cast away the law of the LORD of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel.

Acts 8:22 (KJV)

Repent therefore of this thywickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee.

Truth #fundie godlikeproductions.com

Something GAY People Don't Realize Is That They ARE POSSESSED BY A GAY DEMON, SINCE BIRTH IN SOME INSTANCES

We should feel sorry for them instead of hating them. What the media won't tell you, EVER - is that they [the media/m$m] are in cahoot$ with this demonic entity, thus all the fake news. Pray for Gay people, don't hate them. I am telling the TRUTH. If you are Gay & do not believe me, someday you will know the truth. Ask for God & GOODNESS to come into your life and it will wipe the demonic entity away from your life.. sometimes within minutes. Gay people aren't very gay or happy. It is a miserable life that no one would choose. Thus the misery all around it. Pray for them with compassion. It is a possession which took place in very early childhood.

Not Perfect, But Forgiven #fundie rr-bb.com

It just shows your faith. True Christians can laugh with joy when threatened with death. Most people think we are totally psychotic for that. We don't have a deathwish, we just know where we are headed is infinetely better if we do pass on somehow.

Christians should be the only people on the planet NOT afraid to die. I have a smile on my face all the time because of this knowledge. If I die, I WIN!

Saxoness #racist stormfront.org

10 things Black People are Fearful of after Trayvon Martin that White people already Know

Let me tell you something; Let me tell you something about being White in this country:

In the time since the Zimmerman verdict came in, I have been reading and hearing many things stated by Black people in regards to fears of how this verdict may affect their quality of life in the future, or how it “proves” that they have things to worry about. They have expressed many fears, but I haven’t seen one yet that I, as a White person in this country, have not been living with as a daily occurrence, for my whole life.

You want to know what it’s like to be White in America? Well, you’ll never know completely, but let me give you an idea—let’s start out by talking about some of the things you have expressed fear about following the Zimmerman acquittal:

Fear#1: Non-Black people will be able to kill Black children without justified provocation and get away with less than they deserve or with help from public officials:

White people have understood this fear for a very long time now—and it is a legitimate one for us. Our children are dangerous as victims to the criminal justice system. When they are harmed, those who live their lives and make their fortunes denigrating us are afraid to let anyone know that White people can be victims.

Instead, they prefer to shuttle the case away, and slap the perp on the wrist so that non-White people won’t be offended that any White person had the audacity to be brutalized, raped, or murdered by a non-White angel.

Fear#2: Walking home Black may become a crime:

Well, walking home White has been a crime for some time now. All over this country, Whites know we must be careful where we go, because if we don’t carefully observe the unwritten rules of society, we risk losing our lives for being White “where we don’t belong”. Just a walk home White can end in death.

Fear#3: Young Black people will not be able to wear or carry certain things without being attacked:

We White people know all about this. Whites all over this country know that there are unwritten rules that apply only to them, and not to non-white people. These rules dictate that if they wear certain things which offend or make non-White people uncomfortable, they stand a good chance of being jumped, or even killed.

Fear#4: Non-Black people will be emboldened to commit crimes against Black people:

The emboldening of anti-White crime by blatant shows of anti-White hatred that go uncriticized and even reinforced by the justice system is something that is a real danger to us as White Americans. Racially motivated crime against innocent White victims that goes uncondemned as such, and may lead to even bolder victimization in the future, is an ever present threat to White lives and safety.

Fear#5: Non-Black Juries will acquit attackers of Blacks for racial reasons:

The fear—no the fact—that non-Black juries will refuse to convict those who commit crimes against White people is a fact of life for us.

Fear#6: Stereotyping and Profiling Blacks will increasingly lead to unnecessary deaths:

Unjust stereotypes which paint all Whites as dangerous, hateful, and seeking to harm non-Whites are an everyday wound for every White person in this country. Every one of us, everyday of our lives, is summarily stereotyped, profiled, judged, and dismissed as a “racist”, evil, bigoted, exploitive, and uncaring person—and judged as worthless and worthy of extermination—all by the color of our skin. And, it leads to innocent, unarmed White people being attacked and murdered all over this country in cold blood.

Fear#7: Being constantly seen as a problem to be dealt with:

Think you have a problem of being seen as a problem? You should just be White for a day!!! All throughout our lives, from our tenderest years, to the twilight of our old age, we are constantly told that we are what’s wrong with this country; We are the problem not only in this country, but in the world, and if we would just die off, allow ourselves to be replaced by non-Whites, start hating ourselves, we would do the country and the whole world a favor.

Fear#8: If Black people aren’t careful to constantly tip-toe around non-Blacks, so as not to make them uncomfortable/offend them, they could get themselves killed:

Whites live with this nightmare turned reality, everyday. We know that we must always watch where we go, and what we say, because any statement of pride in our own race, any expression of our opinion that a non-White finds remotely offensive for the most trivial of reasons, or even the most innocent of acts or statements, could land us in the hospital, maybe in a coffin—certainly will land us in some sort of serious verbal attack, or lose us a job, etc.

Fear#9: Black life is not valued as much as the lives of other people:

As White people, we have long since realized that our lives just don’t matter—all that matters is non-White “feelings”. Time and again our lives are disrupted by slander and lies—and nobody cares. Our lives are put on hold by terrifying and cruel crimes of violence—and nobody cares. Our lives our taken from us—and, nobody cares.

Our lives are worthless to those in the non-White community, and self-centered traitors in government, who care only about themselves, money, power, and ambition, and to the media people who care for nothing but their twisted, hateful agenda which teaches that White life is worthless. When we die, we are invisible, unpitied sacrifices. We are an “unprotected class”.

Fear#10: There is a systematic mistreatment and disadvantage faced by Black people in this country:

Whatever any Black person may think, we, as white people, are the single most systematically discriminated against group in this country. We face this disadvantage at every stage of our lives: from kindergarten and on up through our school years where we are degraded and torn down to instill racial guild and shame, to college admissions, to the job market, and freedom of speech in work environments, to a justice system that sees our victimization as a threat, and our pride as a crime. We face a society hostile to Whiteness every day of our lives.

That, is what it means to be White in America. That is what we as White people, must put up with everyday. And, so much more. Starting to see a little bit now? Starting to see the flicker of your own hypocrisy? I hope so. Because you will never know, never bear, the full brunt of what it means to be White in this country—to be constantly denied every right of identity, and torn down, degraded, treated like trash—you can’t, because nothing along the lines of what is being done to us, has ever been done to any other race. But, you can understand maybe a little better.

Next time you hear someone offer “White privilege” as a genuine concept you will be able to help race-relations in this country by pointing out that the only privileges White people have in this country are the privileges of being slandered, accused, and blamed without any chance at self-defense, denied rights without any recognition, harmed without any outcry, and killed without any remorse.

Thank you for your time, the way you respond, will show me the content of your character. If you have a shred of integrity and humanity in your soul you will admit that this is the biggest race problem America has. If you call me a racist, you are judging me by the color of my skin and not the content of my character (hypocritical for you). And you are contributing to the problem.

Let’s have a truly honest discussion about race in this country. Goodness knows we need it. Black America, this is my privilege. Are you still so sure you want it?

TheMeanDM #fundie dakkadakka.com

http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/05/justice/texas-rape-sentence/index.html?hpt=hp_t1



CNN) -- She could have sentenced him to 20 years in prison after he admitted to raping a 14-year-old girl in her high school.

Instead, a Texas judge gave the defendant a 45-day sentence and probation after implying that the victim was promiscuous.

Judge Jeanine Howard told The Dallas Morning News that she based the sentence, in part, on medical records indicating that the girl had had three sexual partners and had given birth.

She told the newspaper that the victim "wasn't the victim she claimed to be" and said the defendant, 20-year-old Sir Young, "is not your typical sex offender."

Ok...flame me if you like...but it doesn't sound like this guy is 100% like the prototypical rapist.

And I really do have to ask...and again flame me all you want...but *if* this girl did lead him on...and did bring him to the brink of the cliff...but then all of a sudden say "no"....how can some of the responsibility not be on her?

I mean really....nobody put a gun to her head and forced her into this whole situation in the first place.

I think the judge is trying to show that the girl has to take responsibility for her actions....one of them being that she made the poor decision to even meet this guy alone somewhere.

Think about that for a minute. They were someplace secluded enough for them to have intercourse....which turned into rape.

I for one don't think, given what I have read so far, that the boy was lying when he said she agreed to meet him for a hook up. Why else would they be in such a place that would allow this kind of thing to happen?

Yes...there are definite instances of rape when the victim is teuly the victim through -zero- fault of their own.

But to knowingly choose to put yourself in a position where it is a possibility of happening....and then claim that you aren't at all responsible in the least for what happened?

Sorry....but that dog don't hunt for me.

And I believe that is what the judge is getting at. In an instance like this, the responsibility should be shared. That there are consequences for actions and choices that we make....and if you don't want to suffer the consequences of poor decision making....then don't make poor decisions.

Just because they are women/girls does not mean that they should get a free pass for poor decision making. Its actually very degrading and flies in the face of all the demands for equality that women have been fighting for over the centuries.

Again...this never would have happened had she not made a poor decision to be in such a place where this guy could have done this.

Just like he never should have made any numher of bad decisions that ultimately led to rape.

There is, in my opinion, blame a plenty to go around in this situation.

Throwaway017092 #transphobia reddit.com

I am tired of every sub glorifying trans people. It is a treatment to help a serious mental disorder, and a poor one at that. I have full support for most of the LGBT community, but I am struggling to justify the praise being trans gets. They are people, and being trans is wrong anyway.

Many trans people regret it after a while realising it’s a phase, and many only do this in the first place due to abuse, which is being hidden by ridiculous support for trans people. Becoming trans is not fixing your dysphoria, same as handing a suicidal person a rope because it’s “what they want” doesn’t fix the problem.

I would not label my self as transphobic (if we go with phobic in this case meaning hatred for). I see them as people, but I still question them. It is wrong. Think about it for a second. Chopping your penis off for a semi-functioning fake vagina. That is not normal. I understand why people do this, but this is not the way to fix not feeling comfortable in your body.

Sorry if this is incoherent, repetitive, or lacking correct terminology. I am just tired of glorifying something that isn’t safe or normal.

Jim Carrey #conspiracy thinkprogress.org

The family of an autistic boy is “pretty annoyed” with Jim Carrey for using the boy’s photo to accompany a Twitter rant against vaccinations, according to a report in Buzzfeed News.

On Wednesday, Carrey — known for his comedic acting and his scientifically illegitimate opposition to vaccination — began tweeting pictures of supposedly autistic children in distress. Those pictures were accompanied by text implying they were victims of vaccines.

When he tweeted out a picture of 14-year-old Alex Echols, the accompanying text read, “TOXIN FREE VACCINES, A REASONABLE REQUEST.” But Alex’s mother, Karen Echols, told BuzzFeed that Alex’s autism had nothing to do with vaccination. In fact, Alex’s condition is caused by tuberous sclerosis, a genetic condition that causes growths to develop on the brain. The condition is actually one of the few things that can be scientifically linked to autism.

“Jim Carrey has a huge platform — a huge following — and is misrepresenting my son’s image by attaching it to his anti-vax rant,” Karen Echols told Buzzfeed’s Virginia Hughes by email.
Carrey has since deleted the tweet and issued an apology.

Several major United States cities recently saw an outbreak of measles — a once-eradicated disease — due in part to a resurgence of what many call “vaccine truthers.” Vaccine truthers subscribe to a conspiracy theory that vaccines cause autism, despite an overwhelming body of scientific literature that has discredited that link.

Carrey himself has been outspoken about opposing vaccines for a long time, but recently drew attention to himself with a series of rants on Twitter. Prior to tweeting Echols’ photo, he accused California Gov. Jerry Brown of “poisoning more children” and called him a “corporate fascist” for recently signing a law that eliminated vaccine exemptions for religious or personal reasons.

Carrey also dated Jenny McCarthy — arguably the face of the vaccine truther movement — from 2005 to 2010.

WikiLeaks #racist dailydot.com

image

...

"The Wikileaks account subsequently tweeted some explanations of what the offending tweet meant, suggesting that “neo-liberal castle creepers” had appropriated the racist-turned-anti-racist solidarity gesture, turning it into “a tribalist designator for establishment climbers.” A clarifying tweet also misspelled “gesture” as “jesture,” which further stoked accusations of witting anti-Semitism.

...

Wikileaks ultimately defended the decision to delete the tweets, saying they’d been intentionally misconstrued by “pro-Clinton hacks and neo-Nazis.” It’s also been maintaining a pretty aggressive public relations posture regarding these latest leaks. It threatened MSNBC host Joy Reid for tweeting that she planned to discuss an “affinity” between the group and the Russian government on her show, saying “our lawyers will monitor your program.”

...

So, again, not the best tone for a group dedicated to prying open closed organizations, regardless of their desires. It also responded to an article by Talking Points Memo’s Josh Marshall, investigating alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Vladimir Putin, accusing him of “weird priority” for focusing on the method of the correspondences' release rather than the data dump itself."

AIG staff writer #fundie answersingenesis.org

Being a creationist for the wrong reason is wrong . . .


Do we feel solidarity with Muslim creationists? The question is largely similar to whether we feel solidarity with those in the Intelligent Design Movement. On one hand, we certainly use many of the same arguments and agree that evolution is an unscientific, by-faith explanation of origins from a naturalistic standpoint. Just as those in the Intelligent Design Movement may generate scientific research we agree with, and just as they may point out societal problems evolution has led to, so also may Muslims.

On the other hand, it is very easy to exaggerate the bond of Muslim and Christian creationists, as the Post article seems to do. The problem stems, first, from a focus on the creationist element of each group’s identity and, second, from forgetting that creationist views are intellectually submissive to religious views. Answers in Genesis is a ministry upholding God’s Word first and foremost—and, because of that, our mission is entirely incompatible with an organization promoting a Koranic worldview. Our position on creation is an outgrowth of a biblical worldview, and our mission is closely tied to defending that connection.

Thus, to even imply that we would find Muslim creationists more like-minded than evolutionists (Muslim or otherwise) misses the point. Any worldview that fails to begin with God’s Word is ultimately flawed, just as any individual without a saving relationship with Jesus Christ remains responsible for their sins before a just God.

David Barton #fundie advocate.com

David Barton, the evangelical Christian founder of the group Wallbuilders, thinks that the federal government should regulate gay sex the way it does alcohol, cigarettes, and certain harmful food ingredients.

“… So if I got to the Centers for Disease Control and I’m concerned about health, I find some interesting stats there and this should tell me something about health,” said Barton.

“Homosexual/bi-sexual individuals are seven times to contemplate or commit suicide. Oooh, that doesn’t sound very healthy,” he cooed.

“Homosexuals die decades earlier than heterosexuals. That doesn’t sound healthy.

“Nearly one-half of practicing homosexuals admit to five hundred or more sex partners and nearly one-third admit to a thousand or more sex partners in a lifetime," said Barton.

Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

Why does God let children die of cancer?

image

AUDIO VERSION: YouTube  Podbean

Why does God let children die of cancer? To answer this question we need to understand some fundamental truths about how this world works.

THE INJUSTICE OF DISEASE

Why does it feel so wrong to us when a child slowly wastes away with disease? There are many reasons. It goes against the natural order of things: children aren’t supposed to die before their parents. It also hurts us and we hate things that cause us pain. We think that the things that hurt us must be evil, therefore cancer is evil. Who do we associate with evil? Satan, of course, therefore Satan is to blame for cancer. This is the theological trail many Christians go down: they end up blaming Satan or else they sigh heavily and say “It’s a fallen world.” Still others personify the disease itself and treat it like a conscious being. “#&%$@ cancer!” is a phrase we see posted on internet profiles by those who are feeling frustrated and helpless as their loved ones suffer in front of them. But is cussing out cancer really getting us anywhere? And is plastering colored ribbons all over the earth really rushing us towards a cure? Suppose they found a cure for all cancers tomorrow and began passing it out for free in every country. Do you know what would happen? A new, nastier, scarier disease would suddenly spring up in our midst. Why is this? Because the One who created this world wants disease to be a part of it.

THE ORIGIN OF DISEASE

The way Christians try to blame everything on the Fall is ridiculous. When we talk like Eve sent the universe spinning out of control the moment she bit into the fruit, we are completely denying what is right in front of our eyes. We need to start back at the beginning of Genesis and try again. No one forced God to curse Adam and Eve with pain, hardship, and physical death. He came up with the idea of making our lives a trial all on His own because this planet was always intended to be a place in which we grow through suffering. So what does this tell us about God? Is He some kind of ogre? No, He’s not. But from our perspective, His methods can seem very cruel.

GOD’S PRIORITIES

In order to understand why God inflicts kids with cancer, we need to understand what His priorities are. Keeping us comfortable, happy and healthy while we are on this earth is not at the top of His list of important things. If He had wanted this place to be a perpetual paradise He would have made it one. Instead, He made Heaven a paradise and arranged for almost our entire existence to be there, provided we properly submit to Him (see Understanding Salvation: Meeting the Demands of Three Gods). We’re only on this earth for a brief blip of time, and while we are here, we are supposed to be growing closer to God. Everything that He does to us down here is with our spiritual best in mind. That includes inflicting children with malignant tumors.

Whenever we find ourselves feeling enraged about some form of suffering, it is because we’ve zoomed the lens in far too close. When we get upset about kids dying of cancer, we are only thinking of ourselves and our immediate earthly happiness. We’re not considering the long-term view. We’re putting the temporary above the eternal in value and worth. God does just the opposite. He says the eternal health of souls is far more important than our momentary sorrow on earth. We say pain is pointless. He says pain is a catalyst for causing great change in people’s hearts. We see a child suffering and say that God is cruel. He sees one child’s experience affecting hundreds of lives and shocking souls out of a fatal stagnation. God hurts us in order to heal us. Everything He does is for our best, but too often we refuse to put any trust in His motives, even though He has proven Himself to be infinitely more loving, faithful, and wise than we are.

No one is more dedicated to the well-being of humans than the One who created them in the first place. This world isn’t something that God stumbled upon one day and took a mild interest in. We are His carefully crafted, intricate masterpieces. He hovers over us constantly, meticulously arranging every detail of our lives. Tumors don’t just happen to people because of bad genes or exposure to toxins. God creates tumors in bodies with the same precision as He creates all of our internal organs. Tumors grow because He makes them grow. They are detected late because He blocks us from finding them early. They are cured because He cures them, and they kill us because He wants them to. God works through medicines, doctors, and a host of other things, yet we must not get so focused on His methods that we miss seeing Him. No child comes down with cancer by random chance or because God abandoned them to the clutches of Satan. God personally selects all the victims of cancer with great care, and it is not because He hates them or is just trying to punish someone.

THE FATHER OF OUR CHILDREN

All children belong to God. He is their true Guardian and when He involves us in their care it’s understood that it will only be for a temporary amount of time. At some point, He takes all of His children back again to an eternal dimension where He parents them directly. On earth, we human parents are simply mediators whose primary job is to teach children who their eternal Father is. Sometimes He gives us a lifetime to love and care for His children on earth. Other times, He reclaims them after only a few years. Do we really have the right to accuse God of being unfair in taking back what is rightfully His? Yes, it hurts terribly, and we shouldn’t pretend otherwise. But to tell God that He was wrong to take what His own hands have made—well, that simply doesn’t work. Other souls are not our property.

DEATH

From God’s perspective, no one dies prematurely and no one dies late. We say they do because we have preconceived notions about how long people should live. We’ve decided that there’s a rule that all children are supposed to outlive their parents. God never gave us any such guarantee. We’ve decided that anyone who dies from diseases or violence has been cheated. This simply isn’t true. God is clear that He predetermines the number of days that each soul will live on this earth, and no one fails to complete their full assignment. This is because no one can end a life without God’s cooperation. He alone has the power to separate soul from body, and to withdraw the breath of life that He put into us.

Humans try desperately to control the lifespan of themselves and others, yet God says that no one can do anything without His cooperation. We can plot and scheme all day, yet it is God who ultimately decides whether our plans fly or flop. We come up with new miracle drugs for cancer, yet it is God who decides who they work on. Some survive chemo, others die from it. Some are cured and stay cured, while others get constant recurring growths. Why is every case so different? Why can’t we find a formula that always works? Because God is involved. He has a far more important goal in mind than curing our physical bodies. He is after our souls.

GETTING OUR ATTENTION

God wants creatures who willingly choose Him, He doesn’t want robots. So while He controls every atom in existence, He also gives us some degree of choice. On a soul level, we are given the option to accept or reject Him. God wants His relationship with us to be a two-way street, not something He rams down our throats. He then spends our whole lives arranging events and experiences that will entice us to seek Him out. What happens when we see a child dying in front of us? We start asking why. We start looking for a cosmic source of justice. We start wondering if life really is some random set of coincidences, or if there could be some purpose to it all. We reevaluate our own lives and wonder if we’re really living for what is important. When the child dies, we look for some external source of comfort that can fill the void in our hearts. We wonder what our child found on the other side of death. We wonder what we will find when our turn comes.

It is when we feel helpless and distressed that we remember God. Too often that is the only time we remember Him. If we had our way, we’d erase all pain from this world and thereby take away one of God’s most effective means of securing our attention. Then we’d all become completely self-absorbed and totally ignore His existence. Does God smile on this plan? Not hardly. Our Creator loves us too much to let us walk away from Him without a fight. He will do anything it takes to intensify our interest in Him

God is the One who makes pain feel stronger when children are involved. Any good parent would much rather suffer themselves than watch their children suffer. This is the way it is supposed to be. God has set up levels of suffering on this earth. All trials are not equal. Some we can easily cope with, others temporarily devastate us. God inflicts children with incurable tumors when He has determined that only extreme measures will accomplish the soul changes He is after. It doesn’t always mean people are fighting Him. Sometimes there is no rebellion at all, yet God has decided it is time to push souls on to the next level of maturity. In every case, He carefully arranges which lives will cross paths, and the intensity of each person’s exposure to the suffering child. Some will sit at the bedside in hospitals, up close to the agony, while others will only receive brief updates through the internet. Every position is carefully arranged by God to spark conversations between Him and us. When a friend of ours is hurting, our natural instinct is to pray for them and tell God to stop doing what He’s doing. Our advice is utterly useless, and our wishes often misguided, but by getting us to talk to Him, God hopes that we’ll be willing to do some listening as well. He has things He wants to teach us in these moments. He isn’t just stirring us up so we can tell Him how to better run His universe. If we want to grow from these experiences, we must be willing to let God lead us instead of trying to lead Him.

When souls cooperate with God beautiful things happen. We change into something better than we were before. Our trust in God deepens. Our perspective of life shifts closer to the eternal viewpoint. Our priorities improve. Even if the changes are only temporary, they are worth it, for we will be all the swifter to respond to Him the next time a crisis arises. It is only when we close our hearts to God that we stagnate. When we demand healing, and even threaten to walk away from Him unless He gives us what we want, we only end up harming ourselves. God is not going to take orders from us. He will continue to do what He knows is best for hundreds of people, even though we selfishly demand that He care only about our personal pain.

If we are to thrive through suffering, we must recognize that there is a bigger picture involved. God is a multitasker who is always accomplishing many things at once. Yes, our suffering matters to Him very much, but to ask Him to stop caring about every other soul who is being positively affected by our pain is going too far. Instead of accusing God of being cruel, we need to give Him the trust He deserves. God knows what is best for us. As parents, we should be well acquainted with the principle that what a child needs is not always what a child will enjoy receiving. It is the same with us and God. He has promised to do what is best for us, even when it requires some misery on our part. The question now becomes, are we going to trust His judgment? Or are we going to insist that we know better than He does and wallow in self-pity? If we are wise, we will not go through life defining ourselves by the pain we have gone through, and the loved ones we have lost. Instead, we will let pain accomplish its good work in us and then let it go. In this world, God uses evil to bring about a greater good. If we align with His Spirit, He will teach us how to thrive through all forms of suffering.

Gian #fundie whatswrongwiththeworld.net

Lydia,
stop being such a wimp and support armed rebellion and revolution.
This is what it ultimately entails. The 1950's style individualism is inadequate to
the (self-appointed) task of fighting the 10th crusade.

The cry of political equality is born of Envy, as the cry of economic equality. The cry of weak, the slothful and deficient men. As there shall always be rich among men, there shall always be rulers among men.

The Church, when it came to power, closed down the pagan temples. She extinguished religious liberty whenever and wherever it attained power. For She is a Ruler. The only difference from a Moslem or a Communist State is that Church is the True Ruler.

Thus why the horror of burning books?. Singer's books should be burned. Church in Her heyday would have burned Singer himself.

I say again, to homeschool is an act of sedition against the State. For the State is not defined by violence (as libertarians falsely) maintain but by reason. And to teach a child to reason contrary to the State is to rear a subversive.

Proph #fundie collapsetheblog.typepad.com

I know I shouldn't be at this point, but every so often I'm amazed at the extent to which Christians (especially Catholics) will delude themselves in order to fit in as good Americans.

Modern America requires Christians to profess falsehood: that their religion is essentially false and therefore unworthy of being entertained on the public stage. The atheist/agnostic will say, of course, that it requires no such thing, that it simply requires them to profess that while they may believe their religion to be true, they cannot know their religion is true, and thus they have no right to act in accordance with their belief by demanding that the state establish and protect their religion. Usually, the rationale is epistemic weakness.

(Peter Drucker made this argument. It's about 75% of the reason I disowned him. It never even occurred to him to question whether or not it was actually true).

But Christians can know their religion is true: they inherited it directly from God Himself. He came down from Heaven in the form of a man and told us of our obligations to Him. If you don't believe that, you aren't a Christian at all. So to say they can't profess belief in the fundamental reality of their religion is to say their religion is false: that a central claim it makes is false. And to require them to act according to this belief is to require them to jettison their faith entirely.

Thus the visceral horror to which, for instance, otherwise good Catholics react when a fellow Catholic (like myself) says, "The state ought to formally establish Catholicism" (or at least "mere Christianity"). Chritsianity may be true, they say, but we only believe it's true, and other people don't believe it!

Well, those people are wrong. That's all. And there is no right to falsehood and error.

Anyway, when did "belief" come to mean something less than fact? Belief is the adherence of the intellect and will to a perceived truth. We all believe the sky is blue, for instance. Because it's blue.

"But what if they take control and outlaw your religion because they believe it's false!"

They do that all the time, though. Why should we unilaterally disarm? (Not that we're talking about outlawing competing religions; such confusion over the historical norm of religious establishment is woefully common nowadays).

And who cares, anyway? We preach Christianity because it's true, not because the state graciously permits us to do so without harrassment. If the state decides to martyr us for not playing along, well, we will be glorified in Heaven and God will avenge our blood. If you don't believe that, you're not a Christian, either. You're just a liar, going to church every week to set a good example for the kids or to keep up appearances (or something). Your real religion is comfort, and you will be stripped of every last speck of it when your soul is dropped into Hell.

Tim Wilkins #fundie christiananswers.net

I am aware the question in this article’s title presupposes a change of some sort is necessary. My presupposition is grounded in the authority of God’s Word. Secondary to that—I am a Christian and a former homosexual.

Having now used that inadequate and puzzling term former homosexual, let me try to decipher the lingo and properly answer the question.

Moving the fridge

A story will help. A man glances out his home window and sees his neighbor. The neighbor has his pick-up truck backed to his side door, both the storm and main doors are propped open and a refrigerator blocks the doorway. Obviously the fridge is being moved and help is needed, so the friendly onlooker rushes to help his red-faced neighbor.

“Need a hand with that refrigerator, Fred?” asks Steven as he throws himself into the task. “Sure do! This thing weighs more than I thought!”

Fred and Steven throw their muscular arms around the appliance. With sweat rolling down their faces, they grunt and strain as the fridge moves a quarter of an inch then stops. They reposition their arms. The fridge barely sways even though both men are winded. After wrestling with the stubborn refrigerator for a full ten minutes, Steven gasps “Fred, I don’t believe we’re ever going to get this thing in the house.” “In the house!” exclaims Fred, “I’m trying to get it in the truck!”

The point is apparent—without a clear and focused understating of what direction the homosexual needs to go, he will progress no further than the refrigerator.

What needs to change?

An illustration will help. Imagine a very thin lady seated at a dinner table. She fidgets with her food, spoons it from one side of her plate to the other, eats little if anything, then excuses herself from the table.

“How can a visibly gaunt woman eat so little or not at all?”, we ask. Our observation could lead us to two premises—either she dislikes food or she is not hungry. If we accept the first premise—that she dislikes food—our sympathetic approach might include a variety of recommendations.

We inquire about the type of food she does like—maybe fast food, Mexican or Chinese. If not perhaps the immaculate look of a seven-course meal appeals to her appetite. Perchance she prefers her food prepared a certain way—broiled versus fried, rare versus well done. If none of these recommendations help, she could have sitophobia—a fear of food.

Let’s now assume the second premise—that she is not hungry. If this suspicion is true she may be suffering from a malfunctioning metabolism. We make a doctor’s appointment for her. The physician suspects a thyroid condition and orders blood work. And it’s possible she has hypogeusia—a diminished sense of taste.

But as persistent as we’ve been, all approaches make little difference in this lady’s eating habits, or lack thereof. She eats very little and infrequently! Our methods have been genuine, compassionate, and justifiable. We have devoted considerable time in our quest to correct the dilemma, but to no avail.

The puzzle comes together

However, if we learn this woman is anorexic, our approach changes dramatically and immediately. We realize our initial assumptions and strategies are ludicrous and laughable because they do not bear on the primary issue—a distorted self image.

When this self-starved lady looks in the mirror she sees an obese lady looking back and no amount of persuasion will convince her otherwise.

When this primary issue is addressed, her food intake as well as the frequency of her eating increases. But take note—her increased eating is a byproduct of confronting the main issue—a distorted self-image. And I use the term image not only from a clinical perspective but a biblical one. Genesis 1:26-27 reads,

“And God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness’… So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” (Emphasis added)

Now the analogy

How does this illustration apply to the homosexual condition? Just as it is absurd for the anorexic’s family and friends to focus on trying to make her eat, so it is absurd for churches to try and make the homosexual heterosexual.

Society in general and churches in particular mistakenly believe freedom from homosexuality is marrying, having 2.3 children and a dog in the back yard. A 2001 secular study on the possibility of change shows the depth of this ingrained “doctrine.” Dr Robert Spitzer, a Columbia University professor interviewed men and women who said they used to be homosexual; I was one of many he questioned. As beneficial as his study was and as much as I appreciate the visibility it gave to change, his study measured heterosexual function of the former homosexual—again missing the real issue.

“But” you ask, “don’t homosexuals need to become heterosexuals?” No! Scripture never states nor implies all people must be heterosexual; it does say explicitly, however, that we are to avoid all forms of sexual immorality, which includes homosexuality. With that in mind have we not at times given the impression that homosexuals must “convert” to heterosexuality? Jesus did not say “Go and make [heterosexuals]”; He said “go and make disciples.”

The opposite of homosexuality is holiness
“But” you ask, “isn’t heterosexuality the opposite of homosexuality?” No! The opposite of homosexuality is holiness!

As I wrote earlier, the term former homosexual is inadequate if not inappropriate. We mistakenly think a person who has found freedom from same-sex attractions is now heterosexual. The former homosexual man or woman may now experience heterosexual feelings, but heterosexuality should never be his nor the churches’ goal. Heterosexuality is in many cases, but not all, a byproduct of the homosexual’s dealing with the primary issues—a distorted self-image and faulty thinking—both of which Satan uses to “gain control.”

Singleness is not a sin, immorality is
The church will do well to remember that singleness is not a sin, immorality is.

What all this means is that most of churches’ advice to the homosexual misses the mark entirely!

Advice well-meant, but wrong

Telling an adult gay son “you just need to date more; you haven’t met the right girl” is senseless. Suggesting your lesbian friend “marry, settle down and everything will work out” is imprudent. Many gay men and women have married, thinking marriage will “heal” them and in most cases the consequences have been disastrous.

Some, hopefully not Christians, suggest a gay man “find a woman who can make you a man.” While I’ve never heard a Christian give such advice, I did have a twenty-seven year old gay man share the following with me. He said he was fifteen when his “Christian” father learned of his homosexual struggle. To “help” his son the father bought him a subscription to Playboy magazine. That’s equivalent to serving roast duck to the anorexic.

God does not heal one form of immorality with another form of immorality! How effective is a machine gun against a tidal wave?

“For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms” (Eph. 6:12).

One married struggler told me his well-meaning pastor recommended he have more sex with his wife. Although the Bible does command conjugal rights (I Cor. 7:3-4), the pastor’s advice bypassed the real issue.

Another pastor prayed with an unusually handsome and struggling man, then told him “I’ve got a really nice girl in the church I want you to meet.”

A Christian friend who knows my testimony, met my wife Lisa and said “I can see why you left homosexuality; your wife is beautiful.” While he is correct that Lisa is beautiful, his statement, like so many, represents a global ignorance on the subject. If attractive women were the remedy for male homosexuality, there would be no gay men.

Many gay men ask me how to cultivate a romantic/sexual attraction to women. I tell them that is not the issue; the issue is a distorted/broken image. (I have often thought how devious our adversary is. He not only confuses men and women regarding their sexual identity, he also confuses them and the church as to what healing really is, thus compounding the problem.)

By dealing with the primary issue, gay men begin to see themselves as masculine and lesbians begin to see themselves as feminine; the same-sex attractions diminish and in many cases opposite-sex attractions occur.

Not a means to an end

During my own journey out of homosexuality I made a significant discovery—Jesus Christ is not a means to an end. He is the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End. I did not go to Christ to get something else, namely heterosexuality. I went to Christ to get HIM!

When we learn this truth, we will witness prison doors falling off their hinges and chains disintegrating.

retardmaxxedcel & ImprovingCel #sexist reddit.com

[The one in quote tags is ImprovingCel]

why do even trans men have it easier in life than trans women?

seriously, trans women have to train their voice, pump themselves with estrogen for significantly longer than trans men to have an effect, won't have clothes they can wear as a woman unless they want to look like a shitty butch dyke, etc

meanwhile trans men have to be on testosterone for like 8 months before they start seeing an effect and can just wear androgynous clothes. and even then they don't have to be tall to get a woman because they're probably exclusively dating other trans people or thirsty lgbt people. JFL it's over for transcels

Huh?? Are you brain damaged? Women have it better trans or not. You think any decent women is interested in a guy without a real dick? Who is also very feminine because shes actually a female? LOL

I was saying it's easier for cis women to transition.

It is

.
.
.

AHahahahhahahaha are you dellusional???? This is so cope. Tranny women have it harder trust me. Hormones don't work on us once you're past puberty.

Signed, a nonpassing subhuman tranny

I'm passing. But it took >3 years for me to get anywhere close to passing.

Meanwhile there's this acquaintance I have who's a trans guy and has been passing since a few months into T JFL.

Nandato??????? You're trans and passing? How could you possibly be incel?

Formerly incel.

You're so lucky, I want to rope so bad

.
.
.

Tbh it's over for us trannycels if you can't pass. I plan on roping when I hit 30.

White Winged Collective of Nine via Galaxygirl #ufo #magick #crackpot voyagesoflight.blogspot.com

We are the White Winged Collective of Nine. Do not fear the Coronavirus, do not fear the many changes. Catalyst for change was needed. As fertilizer to the soil so that the young plants can thrive and survive, so this virus has been benevolently repurposed as an impetus for change, for humanity to band together, for the dark to show its ugly face to the light for healing. It is time to heal your world. Gaia is in desperate need. You were well aware of her cry for help, which is why you were brave enough to embody. We repeat this. You were brave enough to embody, therefore you are brave enough to still be embodied. Do not leave in this critical juncture of timelines, of light infusion. Now is when you are most needed. Hold the light. The heavens are watching, leading, guiding, comforting. Many such as this one has been beyond exhausted as you integrate these upgrades, these changes into your surface world. It is the true the light is intensifying with every moment, for the light reveals all. The light is seeded for the seedlings of truth that have been planted in the tilled soil to flourish. (I am seeing tilling machines, with blades deep into the soil in the clay). Some places of your world that have been inundated with the dark energies are experiencing more tilling, more soil breakup. More light, more fertilizer to these areas. Do not be afraid, for fear hardens the ‘clay’ of the lower energies and lowers your immunity. The light is your immunity. We are aware this may not be a popular post or idea, but we lovingly remind you that Source is in all things, the light is winning, has won, is simultaneously winning. The darkness that you are seeing play out are the weeds and the poisonings of the soil that has been there for eons, now is simply the time that it is being exposed. The cleansing of Gaia is to commence, is commencing. Be at peace.

We are the White Winged Collective of Nine. We wish to offer you a blessing of peace so that these words offer the intended vibratory effect, calming, soothing. May we lovingly gently remind that you are to anchor the light. You are not the farmer plowing the fields. You are not working the tilling machine. You are grounding the light, shining your light on the weeds, spreading your light into the earth so that all is healed. It is a joyful task when in the right vibratory codex, and so we wish to assist with upping your vibration a bit, for a moment, so that these moments of healing become Gaia’s moments of healing. The light workers are banding together in new, interesting, integrating and exciting ways. Your internet, your inter-web of consciousness is providing such new avenues of connection. Technology is also being repurposed as the light shines deeper, more fully.

Raynbowz #fundie rr-bb.com

Did you know vampires are antichrist in nature?
The premise of the vampire is that you drink someone's blood to live forever. In Christianity at the Last Supper, Jesus directed His disciples to drink of His blood, and while it did not directly say they would live forever, it could be implied (if you squint). I used to be very into vampires, but no more!

starbuck #fundie scienceblogs.com

Just a question, Starbuck. Why do Christians frequently end their posts with threats such as this? Out days are numbered? Are you threatening our lives? Or implying that we're going to get struck down by your all mighty? This is the biggest mystery of Christians to me is the threats.

Good grief, No I am not threatening you. I don't even know you... never met. Even if we did, I wouldn't threaten bodily harm upon anyone. Unless of course they tried to do me harm, then they wouldn't be threats (If I was able of course!).

Based upon my beliefs, you will feel the wrath of God. I know, I know.. you say silly and stupid and immoral. I say truth. One day, we will either both know for sure, or we will both know nothing (knowing nothing is your belief.).

I have nothing against you. I just love to poke fun at the damned from time to time. I know, kind of childish. Well I have argued with athiests and to not one would listen. So now I have resorted to picking on them. Kind of like how a child rips the legs off spiders. It's rather humorus.

CosmicCitizen #conspiracy abovetopsecret.com

If you look at the Duchess of Cornwall (Kate Middleton) when she and Prince William presented their son to the media you will notice that a) she still appears to be fully pregnant (faux prego belly?), b) she did not appear to gain weight in her pregnancy and c) in the presentation of the baby Prince William implied (24 hrs post birth) that this was the first time that they really got to see the baby and that they had some "catching up" to do. IF this is true that they faked the pregnancy to cover for a surrogate mother then the question is WHY? First, one of the parents could be sterile, Second, since Kate was a commoner they may have wanted the mother to be of royal (and/or illuminati blood), Third, the birth date (7/22) was important and would have probably required a C Section to be exact (1:30 probability if it was +/- 2 weeks from the due date...assuming conception date at the correct time for a 7/22 birth date) and the Duchess of Cornwall may have not consented to that plan. The 7/22 date is important for several reasons and may have been requested by the Illuminati. A) Full Moon, B) Sun entering Leo, C) Mars-Jupiter Conjunction (war planet - king planet). In addition there is some numerology with the birth date (7/22) and the wedding date (4/29). Adding the months: 4 + 7 = 11, A Master Number (double 1). Adding the days: 2 + 9 = 11 and add that to 22 (a master number so no further reduction) = 33, the highest degree in Masonry.

If this is true then perhaps we should revisit the alleged suicide by the ob-gyn nurse last December (the one that was distraught after getting caught up in a hoax phone call to the ward). Could the nurse have known something and threatened to talk and thus was silenced?

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child #transphobia 3edgesword.blogspot.com

[From "Totally Unforseen Shocking Unpredictable Surprise Revelation: trannies under lockdown edition"]

Mentally ill people are suffering from the lockdown.

Okay, you probably already knew this. But as always when mentally ill people are described by their sick and illegitimate lifestyle choice, it confuses the hell out of Buzzfeed sodomite Patrick Strudwick.

The article is a laugh-a-minute yuckfest. If this doesn't make you guffaw with joy, the Wuhan Flu may have already killed you:

Some try other means to escape hatred within the home: by going back in the closet, playing down their gender identity or sexuality, or, more literally, locking themselves in their bedrooms 24/7.

Apparently these sick homos are so incapable of going through the week without having their broken animal urges satiated that they've invented the term "survival sex" to describe how they prostitute themselves to a fellow uranist just to "get away from" the family they were apparently forced to move back in with since their jobs at David's Tea just don't pay the bills. Later in the article you can read about "additional factors" such as "problematic use of substances": namely the chemical escape that mentally ill ass pirates have to turn to as a means of escapism when they deep down inside realize their sick lifestyle choice is a rejection of all that is moral and right in the universe. Unfortunately there are "interrupted in the drug supply" and then there's a picture of a shiv and then I just can't stop giggling.

Are you sitting down? You should sit down.

Okay now that you're safely seated, please let me introduce you to peak lunacy regarding these nutters: a 54 year old woman who wants to pretend she's part man. She dies her hair bizarre shades of pink and works for a housing charity that "welcomes the gender diverse". Well unfortunately she's had to move back home with her elderly father (which, for those keeping track, is the sort of microeconomics impacts that will ultimately doom more people with COVID than it could possibly save) after she had a run-in with another damaged soul in the housing coop that of course they both live in.

“I was having to work from home in a very tiny room,” they said. One of the straight women who lived there, whom we will call Jill, “lost her job and her way of dealing with that was to take lots of drugs, get pissed and have lots of parties,” said Wyatt. They tried to talk to her, but it had little effect. After yet another loud party, Wyatt told the committee at the co-op that something needed to be done.

“She found out about this and then I heard her screaming abuse, saying things like, ‘tell that slut to get some fucking earplugs.’” It escalated. “She followed me into the kitchen and started shouting and then started breaking the furniture, then ran upstairs and told me I needed to kill myself. And because she knows I have bipolar [disorder] and have a history of self-harm and suicide, that felt very threatening.”


Bipolar with a history of self-harm? From somebody who's so loopy she thinks her lack of a penis was some sort of cosmic oversight? Heaven forbid. So this poor woman who doesn't realize she's a woman had to move back to her daddy's house in her hometown where the kids made fun of her because she clearly looked dyke even then. So trapped she felt (in a charming little beach town a movie-watching length train ride from London Victoria station) that she couldn't even let pillow biter Patrick Strudwick capitalize the name of his religion (Methodist).

The effect of being removed from their home and the city that welcomed Wyatt is more encompassing than traumatic memories. “I don't fit in. I feel completely out of place. I feel I’ve been dropped into being aged 13 again. I have to get out of here.”

Well in the same way that if you decide you're "genderfluid" you must be so, why can't the poor girl just pretend that she's 13 again as well?

moviemeister76 #fundie dailykos.com

At what point does innocent until proven guilty kick in?

When we no longer live in a rape culture.

[Thread 1:]
Nice to see the usual dudebros in here fighting to maintain rape culture. Way to go guys.

You’re either with us or against us, amirite?

Uh, yes. Quite literally. You’re either for ending rape culture. Or you’re not.
I’ve never seen anyone here who is not for ending rape culture.

lol Uh huh.
Uh huh. If you’re serious about that charge, now is where you name names right?

Well, first of all, I pretty much already did. Second, I’d like to thank you and every mediocre man like you for adhering to the same trolling pattern for the last several decades. It’s makes it so easy to spot you all from a mile away.
To be clear, so folks know whether they really should flag your posts for making such a baseless and disgusting accusation... You’re accusing alx9090 and and Roln of being in favor of a rape culture. That right?

Sure go ahead. Flag away. I’m tired of dealing with men who repeatedly blame victims at this site and do everything they can to maintain the status quo of rape culture. Heaven forbid we deal with actual sexism on the left. Much better to just shut us women up, isn’t it?
It must be tough to continue thinking of yourself as a good person when you realize you've been part of the sexual harassment problem all along.

[Thread 2:]

Who needs justice? I’ll get us a rope. Let’s go find us some guilty-looking folks. We can string `em up and feel better about ourselves. Doesn’t matter if they even did anything.

Oh please. You guys really need to get better material. Why don’t you go back to victim blaming Louis CK’s victims and pretending those women consented to what he did.
OR, and here’s an idea, you can deal with the idea that this diary makes guys like you uncomfortable for reasons you’re not willing to admit or even deal with. Much Easier to just attack women and let us know that as long as you’re alive, none of us are ever really safe.
Setting aside the presumption of innocence is the issue for me.
You were asked a serious question and you gave a slogan answer that had nothing to do with it — unless you really do intend to do away with the bedrock principle of modern justice and the presumption of innocence.
It’s always been hard to make a point with you because you so frequently use hate indiscriminately (“dudebros” is the n-word to my ears) against people who by and large support you.

[Thread 3:]
Innocent until proven guilty only applies to a court of law. The same courts and laws which have denied justice to sexual assault and rape victims pretty much since forever.

You have to prove that a crime was committed by the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
A high percentage of these cases are one persons word against another, no witnesses, no or equivocal physical evidence, usually alcohol involved.
Taking someone’s life and freedom is extremely serious. With little evidence other than words, what is a court to do?

Please. As if innocent people don’t go to jail and guilty people set free all the time. This idea that we can only know someone’s guilt via a court, that we can only achieve justice via a court is ridiculous.
The authors of the Constitution said “the accused shall be presumed innocent until a judge or jury delivers a guilty verdict.” BTW, the accused — whether is it an elected lawmaker, a movie producer, or the school janitor — should be either acquitted or convicted in a court of law, not in the court of public opinion. Any other way is called vigilante justice or kangaroo court.

What a splendid idea! Quote slaveholders who didn’t believe women should have the right to vote. Now you’ve totally convinced me.
Do you know of any other legal way? Would you really like the US turn the justice system totally upside down, and allow the law enforcement community to declare someone guilty, and then shoot the “convicted felon”? I surely don’t want that, and no decent honest prosecutor wants that. If that is really what you want, then I suggest moving to Iran, and make sure you go out of your way to be accused of a crime.

Guilt in a criminal sense can only be determined through the court system, and one that is neutral, not racist/classist/homophobic/etc., and one giving the accused access to competent representation.
You seem to think innocent people are imprisoned and guilty people are set free all the time, so what’s a few more? NO.

laidnyc #sexist web.archive.org

I'LL LOVE YOU FOREVER UNTIL YOU TURN 30

Your Seed is Gold

Sex is too easy.

Work out, put on nice clothes, talk to girl, tease her, tell her cool things about me, pretend to be interested in her, fuck her.

See?

Too fucking easy.

It’s stupid.

I don’t give a shit about sex. Any broad can spread her legs.

You know what I do care about? Holding girls to a higher standard.

Why? Because my seed is liquid fucking gold and I don’t give it out like its god damn tap water.

See girls, your pussy is powerless to me. What else you got?

You slip on a tight skirt and throw on some makeup and flaunt those nice tits and think your job is done. You shit-test me all the way into the bedroom expecting me to give you amused mastery and show you my status and give you attention and ignore you just right all at the same time, and then you’ll give me sex.

But why should I give you my valuable time and let you revel in my charisma?

Sex, is that the big deal? I’m supposed to feel so grateful that you blessed me with that magical unicorn pussy of yours?

I got news for you girls. For a guy with any clue, finding sex is as easy as finding a pizzeria in New York, and like pizza in New York, its all pretty fucking good.

Your brand ‘aint that special.

Sex is everywhere and anywhere I want it, I don’t give a shit about yours.

It takes more than a nice curve of the ass or a bat of the eyelashes to earn my seed.

My salty essence and genetic code is a gift from my father, and his father, and his father, and on it goes. Its the sticky genetic code of self-sufficient men who have protected and provided for family, women and children. Its the haplogroup of men who built civilization. I have the genetic lineage of warriors, business owners, firefighters, blacksmiths, farmers, herders, poets, politicians, soldiers, artists and even chefs. Hard jobs that help build the world, thinking jobs that help build a culture, they’ve all been done by men in my bloodline. My ceiling for accomplishment is limitless.

I’m not some average guy begging to give my seed away. My seed is valuable and I know it.

Men of lesser genetics may be able to afford spraying their seed anywhere; I allow myself no such atrocities.

My sperm could populate an entire society of strong good looking altruistic people and any girl who takes it in would be lucky to be a vessel towards that new world.

But for that I demand a high price.

Whether or not our sex is intended to end in pregnancy makes no difference. Just the sheer fact that it could makes me demand the same high price.

You better have enviable genetics yourself- I don’t breed with inferior stock. Beauty is the minimum and you better know how important that is. Long hair grown to impress me, healthy diet and exercise to maintain your figure and viability of your eggs.

But the beauty that draws the stares, stutters and drools of lesser men won’t capture my attention for more than a millisecond. I am inundated with a surplus of beauty in my daily pursuits, I can assure you that yours ‘aint that special. You probably look like shit first thing in the morning or on the first day of your period.

I expect impeccable hygiene and classy style. A body tainted by tattoos and excessive piercings and slutty clothing signals you are available for sex to lesser men than myself. I’ll have none of that.

I demand a low N count to show you value your body and sex, and the seed I am about to give you will be appreciated on the level it deserves. A low N count shows both intelligence and confidence as you are smart enough not to give your body to charlatans and scoundrels, and confident enough to wait for the high value man you know you deserve.

I expect manners and grace. No swearing, drunkenness, burping, sarcasm or anything else unbecoming of a lady. I spend a lot of time working with and competing against men in my daily life, the last thing I need is the company of a woman who acts like the men I must compete with. You exist to soothe, not to grate.

A year from now I will be richer and fitter and more socially respected in the Kingdom, but your beauty will have faded a notch. I demand that you treat me with the humility and respect that this biological reality dictates.

Finally, there is nothing I despise more than a woman who shows any disgust for my jizz.

It is the Royal Essence and you better enjoy every last drop.
If it lands on your face, chest or back, consider it raindrops from heaven, a rope of Holy Yogurt.
If you are lucky enough to get it in your mouth, savor it like the nourishing nectar of the Gods.
If I shoot it inside you consider it the greatest compliment of all. You will feel an immediate buzz.
My jizz is to women what Walter White’s pure blue meth is to junkies.
You’ll take my seed, sweetly tell me “thank you sir” and buzz with happy feminine energy for the next day while you iron my fine shirts and indulge in memories of me.

I’ll settle for nothing less.

Some girls don’t want to respect a man that much. They have been poisoned by feminism or never had a strong male figure to look up to growing up or they have already taken far too high a volume of cock to revere their next one. I have no use for those girls. Even a one-night stand with them is worthless beyond the ten-second orgasm, itself not worth the time spent to get it. Leave them for the men who have a low enough opinion of themselves to not demand such respect.

For guys, I don’t give a shit how many girls you’ve fucked just like I don’t give a shit how many pizzerias you’ve eaten at. A man is measured more by the pizzeria’s he refuses to eat at, the prices he refuses to pay for average pizza, if you know what I mean.

Remember, you set the price of your seed.

Mine is fucking gold.

What’s yours?

Der Metzger #racist tightrope.cc

This year, we have a new history teacher at school. HE IS DARKER THAN COAL! It might seem "usual" for Americans to have Negroes for teachers, but here in Quebec, IT'S NOT!

Holy shit...I mean in my class there is 31 white students and 1 nigger "student"...In the whole school, there is 1000 whites, 3 yellows (1chink/1gook/1jap), 3 wet-backs, 1 native Canadian, 2 sand-niggers and 4 negroes! THIS MEANS THAT OUR SCHOOL IS 98,7% WHITE !!!! Why do we need a black teacher from fuc*ing Congo?

But this is not the worst, since History is my favorite school subject, I decided to attempt to now what we would study this year. You know what "it" answered? ; (...)We will study the influence of important figures such as Martin Luther King(...).

As I was trying not to smash my head against the wall, I asked ; Will we study the bases of the IIIrd Reich, the most important phase in human history? "It" answered ; Sure! we will talk about the holocaust, and the misery the Jews endured. (WTF ?!?!?)

Later that day, I was expelled of the class for being "impolite to the history teacher"... My father told me that even if the teacher is a damn Africoon, I must listen in class and shut the fu*k-up...He said that the only way I should "make my mark in his class" is by having "kick-ass" grades (wich I do).

What you guys think about all this?
__________________

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

(responding to a post on her channel called "The Silencing of the Lambs", link goes here:
https://onenewsnow.com/perspectives/michael-brown/2019/03/21/the-silencing-of-the-lambs?utm_source=OneNewsNow&utm_medium=email&utm_term=16793253&utm_content=68268707811810616&utm_campaign=38366

Lady Checkmate:
AuntiE*TFL, its like you've taken a page out of our history here on DISQUS. I have chills just thinking about the door you just opened for us by posting this OP. I've been trying to find the right time and way to share with everyone here how insane, violent, hateful and obsessed the radical-left is with conservative Christians. They hate us and they stalk us to find ways and opportunities to act on their hate.

AuntiE, if it's ok with you, I would like to share examples of their hateful, obsessive stalking, threats, intimidation tactics and attempts to silence us. These are real life examples that have happened here on DISQUS. I ask your permission because this is your thread and I don't want to derail it. I can always start a separate thread, if you prefer. No hard feelings either way????.

P. S. I will not post his most vulgar posts like his porn, violence, threats, etc., if you agree.

I'm very familiar with the tactics of the alt-left. They were tried here, on me. This is not sympathy-shopping. I need to obey God and get the truth out-hopefully equipping others to face the persecution that is surely coming to all believers. This is me sharing examples of what their MO looks like when it's played out irl. It saddens me when I hear that "Christian" forums are hosting blasphemy, mockings, heresy and that which is not right in God's eyes for fear of being "trolled" and persecuted. I would prefer to please God than to compromise and be a man-pleaser; nevertheless, I love the brethren and continue to pray for them. I'm doing this for all of us.

Initially, it came as a surprise. I (along with a couple of other mods-who are better at modding than me btw) mod a small community of channels. Our community hosts mostly Christian Conservatives, traditional conservatives and a few liberals. All are welcome as long as they comply with our community guidelines. At some point, I had to ban an alt-left troll that was blaspheming, mocking God, and wanted to use our community to promote sin and abominations. He then warned me that he would, "be a proverbial thorn in my side". I shook the dust from my feet. I figured there are many channels on DISQUS, he'll move on and find one that's a good fit for him. He came back with dozens of sock accounts...all of which were promptly banned as socks violate our community guidelines and DISQUS ToS. He initiated his first level of attack...

By ridicule:
He started with personal insults (b-word, c-word, questioning my faith because I'm a bible-believing, conservative Christian, etc.,), more blasphemy, more mocking what we believe (all of which violated our community guidelines), with many lies peppered in and he was repeatedly sanctioned. He refused to comply with our community guidelines, refused to comply with Disqus ToS and refused to honor the sanctions. He increased his sock and bot usage. He formally notified me that he would be targeting me, stalking me, harassing me and encouraging others to do the same:

image

I continued to obey God. He increased his trolling, sock and bot usage and peppered in something about "slander" and "burden of proof" in the comment above, as if he were preparing for a legal battle-perhaps this was his way of trying to intimidate me or convince me that he had the legal right to target, threaten and harass me (implying he might have the upper hand in any legal battle). In the process, he informed me that our community guidelines were "worthless to him".:

image

I continued to operate our community as I said I would. It seems he felt his trolling-war tactic had given him the upper hand and he could get me to obey him and give in to his demands. He then "urged" me to read a comment of his barking orders at me and issuing ultimatums that I had to bow to him OR he would continue to troll me:

image

I chose to live on my feet, obeying God rather than bow before him. When I ignored his demand and ultimatum, he sent me a comment in which he thanked his socks and bots for helping him target and harass me and he included a reminder to me to obey him or continue to be trolled and harassed:

image

When I ignored his reminder as well, he addressed the fact that I was "ignoring" him and indicated he felt he'd won a victory of some sort through trolling and harassing me:

image

By legal action & by expulsion
He began rallying others to help him get a petition to started to have me banned and our Conservative Christian community closed. Make no mistake, he wanted me expelled because I would not bow to him and his demands and he hates the fact that Christian conservatives (who don't want to be hounded, vexed, harassed and dogged by trolls) have a safe space here to fellowship in peace. I chose to honor God. He began to post his calls for my expulsion and our community's closure all over DISQUS, including in our community:

image
image
image

He literally went all over DISQUS, on different channels, claiming he was getting a petition together to have me removed and our community closed. When a mod told him that wouldn't happen and he had no grounds to have me removed, he stated he hoped I was "scared".

By exclusion
When he failed to have me removed as a mod and our channels closed, he began trying to exclude my communities from the trending list via mass down-voting and decided that he'd just try to keep others from commenting in our community and use his troll channel to tell other users not to post here:

image
image
image

It's really important that we point out that when he failed to get me to obey him, failed to troll me into submission, he started in with the death wishes, death fantasies and death threats (those are on file with the authorities). The alt-left does not tolerate opinions that differ from theirs.

Please do not overlook that he uses different sock accounts/user names to circumvent his sanctions-violating the DISQUS ToS and our community guidelines to stalk and harass me, but expects AND actually demands that I obey him and entertain his trolling or continue to be trolled. The alt-left is manipulative, hateful, conniving liars who will use threats, deception, ultimatums and intimidation in their attempt to control the thoughts, beliefs, and even speech/comments of Christian conservatives. This is not a game. These people are strategic in how they approach targeting, stalking, harassing and trying to destroy Conservative Christians, Christian business owners, Christian places of worship and anyone who stands against their anti-christ agenda. This is one of their new forms of persecution. Watch and pray.

*I intentionally blocked the inappropriate parts of his comments: lies, spam links, profanity, etc. My intent was to show the insanity in their actions, not allow trolls a platform to continue to harass and troll.

Thank you again, AuntiE*TFL (AuntiE*TFL). We have to get the truth out so that others experiencing this form of persecution know whats going on and how to respond. I apologize for the length.

Acquitted #fundie rr-bb.com

Oh I hope He does come soon. This world is going down the toilet so fast. I know I shouldn't fear, and I don't for myself, but I have a wife and 8 year old son. It's them that I don't want harm to come to. I just can't imagine what would happen if they showed up at our doors and said it's time to go to the "camp".

With how many times I've written our congressman, written letters to the editor for our paper, belonging to multiple Christian and political websites as well as being an elder at our church, I'm sure I'm already red flagged. Well, at least I know my eternal security regardless what happens, and therein lies my hope and joy, that I will forever be with the Lord! But even so, come Lord Jesus, come! Right now would be good.

Ben Garrison #conspiracy grrrgraphics.wordpress.com

image

Here is a cartoon inspired by statist thinking:
Tea Party Caveman Cartoon


It shows a stinky caveman with a club telling the viewer that he is self-sufficient. ” ‘Zog’ not need government, taxes, healthcare, socialized services, public schools, police and libraries. Zog hunt, gather and barter. Zog not need civilization!”

The cartoon is titled “Tea Party in Historical Context.’ I guess we are to have contempt for the ignorant cave man representing those who want freedom from big government. Apparently ‘Zog’ lacks the proper egalitarian instincts and love for his community the cartoonist thinks he should have. Without government, how would Zog evolve and pay his taxes, which go for important stuff we all need–such as the things he lists. This is why we especially need the income tax. But wait a minute–a lot of that income tax money goes toward paying interest on our un-payable $14 trillion debt. That means the income tax they extort from us by threat of a gun and imprisonment (how civilized!) goes directly into the pockets of elite bankers who are able to remain discreetly private. It is taxation without civilization. Oh, but they get away with it because they print and control the money. They own the money. Congress can stop them, but they own Congress. They own us.

Schools, libraries and police funding comes from property taxes. Roads come from gas taxes. Sales taxes, fees and fines pay for state and city projects. The military (they can’t account for trillions of dollars that goes missing nearly every year) gets paid by corporate and income taxes. Health care currently comes from overpriced insurance premiums or bankrupt Medicaid. Social services? All that money we send in and they get only 30 percent.

The cartoonist implies we can’t do away with the Federal Reserve. Without our masters we’d have to barter! That’d be scary–almost like anarchy! (Anarchy is what statists call it. I call it ‘freedom). Statists think we can’t go back to gold and silver that held its value over long periods of time. A return to dark, archaic ‘olden’ times with less government is abhorrent to them. Come to think of it, barter would be preferable to the Federal Reserve slave system and their thug IRS agents. They hold a much bigger club than Mr. Caveman. Don’t pay your taxes and they take your stuff. If you resist, deadly force can be used.

The Federal Reserve is owned by private bankers for their own profit and their system of money has robbed us and robbed our children’s future. Do we enjoy paying taxes that help kill innocent people in foreign countries in order to maintain the banker-rupt empire? That hardly seems ‘civilized.’

But my point is this: His cartoon suggests that ‘government’ IS ‘civilization.’ In which case, Pol Pot’s society was very civilized. So was Hitler’s…etc.

Following this logic, apparently in order to get more civilized we need bigger and more government. The bigger the better. Maybe even WORLD government which will make sure the entire Earth becomes uber-civilized. Unfortunately that’s what we are getting, but somehow getting zapped or groped at an airport isn’t making people feel more civilized. What’s actually happening is we’re becoming more domesticated. We are owned and they’re conditioning us to that fact. Our elite owners are now telling us how to live, what to think, what light bulbs we can use, how much heat we can have, what to eat, what we can say and what health care we need. And when we’re old, death panels will tell us we have outlived our usefulness and will tell us when we must die. Big government will be there at the cradle…assigning them up to the grid. Big government will decide what shall be taught. Big government will decide what jobs we shall have. Big government will watch, record and monitor us to make sure we’re not speaking out against their system. That would make us terrorists! And most of all, big government will keep its property–its people/cattle– ‘safe.’ We The tax cattle People will pay for our own enslavement, of course.

Toward the end, when we’re all so poor we can barely exist…then perhaps we’ll look like our ancient ancestor in the cartoon. But at the very least we’ll all be extremely ‘civilized’ thanks to big government.

With all this in mind, I decided to draw this cartoon as a retort. I was also inspired by an episode of Star Trek, in which naive, simple people depended on a scary tiki-like god named ‘VOL’ to solve all their problems and keep them safe. “VOL makes the grass grow…he put fruit on the trees!” And so on. The controller god in my cartoon is called “GUV.”

A final reason I drew this was due to a recent conversation I had with a friend who thought that not to support the government was somehow ‘unpatriotic.’ Wrong! True patriots believe in the Constitution and condemn the government when it abuses the people. It’s our duty to do so. People have become afraid to question the government as it tries to condition citizens into believing that less government leads to ‘anarchy.’ I guess anarchy is another word for ‘freedom.’

caamib #sexist blogger.com

"No is because you don’t actually feel sorry for these people. To things like you stories of horrific assaults are just wank material for you."

I do feel sorry for people who get unjustified sentences due to maniacs like you and I don't wank on stories of horrific assaults. In fact, even as late as 2013 I COULDN'T GET IT UP WHEN A WOMAN I COERCED INTO SEX WAS THRASHING BELOW ME WHEN I TRIED TO PUT IT IN HER, despite the fact that 1. she came to my home 2. we already arranged what prize she should be given 3. she even blew me to get me hard to finally put it her 4. we even joked around later that day. This changed drastically later but what you don't understand is that most "horrific assaults" done to women today is caused by feminism, which made decent men unable to get consensual sex. That's why they must resort to rape - because consensual sex in the West is basically impossible to get unless you're really, really evil. There's exceptions but they're extremely rare.


" Hell one of your pedophile friends on you Wordpress blog asked a women victim to detail her date rape"

And what is wrong about this? Unlike maniacs like you, I don't fetishize rape to be some greatest crime and trauma on Earth. Oh, wait, neither do you if the rapist isn't a white male, and you'd let your mothers and sisters be raped by classes you see as underprivileged. But let's get back to this. This woman was under no obligation to reply so what? Btw, you know who also asks this of women who claim to have been raped? Institutions like courts do. Another thing you'd like to do away with !

"I made sure to spread his profile around to people who are willing to contact him and tell him what he outta do."

Where? To my e-mail? Nobody is even sending me any hate mail these days. Everybody knows I just get a kick out of it.

"Because of people like you I have the job that I have, out of all the hundreds of kids I’ve seen only 36 were abused by “child molesters.” "

If that's true I'd fear for the safety of anybody working with or being around such an insane, hysterical person. Adults, children, whatever. You are the ones with skeletons in your closet, I am probably not talking metaphorically. Just look at your post.

" The rest were attacked by pedophiles, pedophiles who caused lasting physical and mental injuries. Injuries so horrific some adults don’t even recover let alone a 3-year old who is repeatedly raped."

This isn't what Eivind is talking about, but now that you mention it I'll be honest - I'm not sorry. Regardless if kids were male or female, not sorry. I hate 99,9 percent of modernist Westerners and want only the worse for them. If some get abused, traumatized or even killed I don't care, no matter what the age. They would or are to grow up as bad, bad people. You are a grown up Westerner and you're a bad person. And so will/would they be.


" Pedophiles who drove 15 of these kids to kill themselves, deaths that I personally witnessed..... I’ve witnessed countless other suicide attempts by crazed victims who want their nightmares to stop....t. She killed herself when she was 10 years old not too long after I walked into an old run down shed after hearing her screaming and crying and telling the two pedophiles raping her to stop. Because of your kind she’s dead. I held her while she died and I will not forget that. I was 15-years old when she died, I still have the clothes I was wearing when she bled out. Her blood is still soaked into them and some days I have to struggle to not break down sobbing at that memory."

Holy shit I laughed so hard at this. This story continues here and here

http://theliterarylink.com/gretel.html

http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/grimm053.html

Also, how does a 10 year-old kill herself so efficiently? Tell me more about it. Or those 15 suicides you've witnessed.

" Your kind is a blight that must be purged. If only Hitler had killed you all, if only he could’ve killed you all, if only he didn’t target Jews and Romanis."

So aside from being utterly psychotic you also lack basic knowledge of history and think 2017 world was just like 1937 world ? Had Hitler gone after pedophiles (not that me and Eivind are that) he'd kill no more than couple of hundred of people at best even including countries he conquered, at even that's probably an overstatement. He'd have to kill just convicted ones who were convicted due to actual crimes the kind of which you describe and there were really a few people like that in 1930s. It was notoriously hard to even track who is homosexual without special lists at the time and many of the names were people who were set up for some reason while some gays were protected as long as they were useful (Ernst Röhm being a prime example of this).

". I hope someone finds you and kills you and each and every one of your baby raping friends too. "

I have never raped a baby nor has any friend that I know of. I think same goes for Eivind... You, on the other hand...

"Your kind is one without remorse or sympathy, you’re incapable of understanding right from wrong or caring about the pain you cause others."

... support blacks, Muslims or any other group you think lacks privilege raping and killing even newborns because they're Sacred according to you and cannot be held accountable. I know this and you know this. I know it in the way you write phrases like "far-right" or how you mention Trump. At the same time you want white males to have no fair trials, no hearings, just off to prisons with them. So why don't you just admit what you're all about? Because, believe me, I know what you're all about. I know you. You cannot pull the veil over my eyes. I will never stop fighting you because I know what you are. Don't forget that.

"People like you destroy lives."

Good.

"What makes you think you deserve anything good in life?"

Nothing, given that I never said this. What makes you think white males will go along with your idea that they must be exterminated but Sacreds can do as they like? What makes you think modern Western women deserve not to be raped by them?


"’m not a religious man, religion is false. But if Hell is real I hope you burn there, I hope you suffer every imaginable horror and humiliation both known and unknown."

Funny, exactly something I think about you and your kind.

" The day is coming when we’ll be able to openly kill your kind again. I can’t wait for this to happen."

There was never a day when you could have killed "our kind", given that people like me and Eivind were a majority even 50 years ago in most places. Hell, I mentioned 14 year-old eight graders with fuck buddies around 12 years ago. Nobody had a problem with this. It was seen as normal. That you equate those like Eivind and me with people who rape babies while you actually support babies being raped, just by appropriate groups of people, is why you're such a laughingstock.

No, pal, the kind of people who it will be legal to kill again soon are your kind. Liberalism didn't appear for the first time in history and always ended up with slaughter of liberals, before or after they destroyed the society which nourished them. You will be exterminated by Muslims you so worship and people like me.

You are guilty of most vicious crime in the history of the world, and that is feminism. I know what it did to me and many of my friends. There will be no forgiveness.

Der_Metzger #racist tightrope.cc

This year, we have a new history teacher at school. HE IS DARKER THAN COAL! It might seem "usual" for Americans to have Negroes for teachers, but here in Quebec, IT'S NOT!

Holy shit...I mean in my class there is 31 white students and 1 nigger "student"...In the whole school, there is 1000 whites, 3 yellows (1chink/1gook/1jap), 3 wet-backs, 1 native Canadian, 2 sand-niggers and 4 negroes! THIS MEANS THAT OUR SCHOOL IS 98,7% WHITE !!!! Why do we need a black teacher from fuc*ing Congo?

But this is not the worst, since History is my favorite school subject, I decided to attempt to now what we would study this year. You know what "it" answered? ; (...)We will study the influence of important figures such as Martin Luther King(...).

As I was trying not to smash my head against the wall, I asked ; Will we study the bases of the IIIrd Reich, the most important phase in human history? "It" answered ; Sure! we will talk about the holocaust, and the misery the Jews endured. (WTF ?!?!?)

Later that day, I was expelled of the class for being "impolite to the history teacher"... My father told me that even if the teacher is a damn Africoon, I must listen in class and shut the fu*k-up...He said that the only way I should "make my mark in his class" is by having "kick-ass" grades (wich I do).

What you guys think about all this?

Jon Rappoport #conspiracy jonrappoport.wordpress.com

Zika: The CDC is the medical CIA

Its agents run global covert ops

The virus hunters

While I was writing my first book in 1987, AIDS INC., I spoke with a media rep at the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). After a bit of wrangling, he told me what I wanted to know: the CDC sends certain people to Langley for CIA training, and when they come back they have advanced security clearances.

This melded nicely with what I was learning about the CDC’s little-known Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS). Right off the top, I can tell you they create disinformation on a scale that must make the CIA jealous.

Graduates of this EIS program, as proudly stated by the CDC, have gone on to occupy key positions in the overall medical cartel: Surgeons General; CDC directors; medical school deans and professors; medical foundation executives; drug-company and insurance executives; state health officials; medical editors and reporters in media outlets.

It’s a loyal insider’s club. They collaborate to float prime-cut, A-number-one cover stories of extraordinary dimensions. They invent medical reality out of thin air.

Here is a brief excerpt from the CDC’s website, “50 Years of the Epidemic Intelligence Service”:

“In 1951, EIS was established by CDC following the start of the Korean War as an early-warning system against biologic warfare and man-made epidemics. EIS officers selected for 2-year field assignments were primarily medical doctors and other health professionals…who focused on infectious disease outbreaks. EIS has expanded to include a range of public health professionals, such as postdoctoral scientists in statistics, epidemiology, microbiology, anthropology, sociology, and behavioral sciences. Since 1951, approximately 2500 EIS officers have responded to requests for epidemiologic assistance within the United States and throughout the world. Each year, EIS officers are involved in several hundred investigations of disease and injury problems, enabling CDC and its public health partners to make recommendations to improve the public’s health and safety.” (italics added)

Several hundred investigations a year. An unparalleled opportunity to shape the truth into propaganda. Control of information about disease. Control out in the field, where EIS agents rush to the scene of “outbreaks,” all the way through the hallowed halls of academia, into the press, into Big Pharma, into the government.

When I say control of information, I mean disinformation. That’s what the EIS is for. They’ve never met a virus they didn’t love, and if they couldn’t find one, they pretended they did.

They front for the medical cartel. And they provide cover for the crimes of mega-corporations. There’s a town where poverty-stricken people are dying, because horrendous pesticides are running into the water supply and soil? No, it’s a virus. There’s a hotel where the plumbing is broken and human waste is getting into all the bathrooms, and they want this hotel to be the epicenter of a new epidemic? No, it isn’t the plumbing, it’s a novel virus never seen before by man. There’s a section of a city where the industrial pollution is driving people over the edge into immune-system failure? No, it’s a virus.

And here’s the capper. Their propaganda is so good most of the EIS people believe it themselves. You don’t achieve that kind of robotic servitude without intense brainwashing. The first installment of the mind-control program is called medical school.

The EIS would have you believe the whole world is being attacked by viruses, all the time. That’s their mission.

Here is the data you need to know. I’ll try to boil it down. To even begin to say a particular virus might be causing a disease, you have to remove diseased tissue from many humans with the same symptoms, put the tissue samples under an electron microscope and see a whole lot of that particular virus, not just one or two stragglers. This procedure is rarely done. The tests that are used widely, the antibody and PCR tests, are worthless for this purpose. I have provided details in other articles (see this “zika” one).

Finding what might be a particular virus in a few people doesn’t cut it. Which is exactly what happened in the 2003 SARS “epidemic,” for example. Ten closed labs did all the original research. They emerged with what they called a coronavirus as the cause of SARS. However, in Canada, as the weeks passed, fewer and fewer diagnosed SARS patients showed any sign of the virus. It was all a ruse, a con.

Researchers are trained to think that possibly finding a virus in a few patients allows a conclusion that the virus is causing the disease. This is utter nonsense.

In the case of Zika, as I wrote in a recent piece, Brazilian researchers have just gone off the reservation and decided to revisit their own original findings. So far, they’ve only been able to confirm six cases of microcephaly (small heads, brain impairment) where the Zika virus is present. Six. The whole thing is turning out to be ridiculous.

The Brazil op has several dimensions. I’ll point out one here. The Zika virus, as in other cases, will be strongly linked to global warming (yet another example of bereft “science”). This tune will be sung: mosquitoes that carry disease are expanding their territory because of warming, and therefore people who once considered themselves safe from these “exotic” viruses will fall ill and die. Bottom line: to limit warming, the planet must adopt cap and trade, carbon taxes (and lower energy production). This is the Globalist agenda. It is intended to drive countries deeper into misery, debt, and chaos—thus making it easier to install a wider and wider global management system.

And this line of psy-op and propaganda begins with the virus hunters of the EIS. They control and own the chokepoint of disease research. They blow up their scanty findings into ex-cathedra pronouncements.

And of course, this strengthens the vaccine establishment because, for every virus, there must be a vaccine: the shot in the arm, loaded with toxic chemicals and a variety of germs.

The EIS. The CDC’s band of brothers. The medical CIA.

Sher Zieve #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Sher Zieve of BarbWire says she is on to President Obama’s secret plan to “import” thousands of Muslims into the U.S. by “calling them ‘refugees’” in order to “bring in enough of them to the USA so that they can and will help him overthrow it — they follow Muhammad’s actions to usurp it and begin their own communities segregated from the rest of the people.”

In these American “Shariah Controlled Zones,” according to Zieve, “Non-Muslims had best not enter or they will be stoned…and soon, I suspect, likely worse.”

“We are now fighting for our lives and souls against as malicious and evil an enemy as ever walked the Earth,” Zieve writes. “And, like locusts, Islam does devour and destroy everything it touches.”

"Since its inception–when Muhammad chose the pagan god Ba’al as the god-leader of his new system and named it/him Allah, Islam has been a system of violence and almost unspeakable acts committed against non-believers…or Muslims who don’t practice its ways as the Imams of an area believe they should. Remember that the only time Islam and its Muslim adherents are non-violent is when there aren’t enough of them in an area to overwhelm and overcome the indigenous populations. But, when their populations grows to a certain level, the true barbarism of these people begins to immediately rear its head. We’re seeing it now in large portions of Dearborn, Michigan where Muslims have taken over and will not allow those of another faith to enter their community, let alone live there. When Muslims come into an area–and the Obama syndicate is working 24/7 to bring in enough of them to the USA so that they can and will help him overthrow it–they follow Muhammad’s actions to usurp it and begin their own communities segregated from the rest of the people. They then spread and take over more and more land, forcing out the current residents with acts of violence. In 2013 alone, Obama had over 300,000 Muslims imported and in 2014 he imported at least 70,000 more…calling them “refugees.“ This is what has happened to Dearborn, which is–for all intents and purposes–no longer part of the State of Michigan and certainly not the USA. Police will not protect non-Muslims in this area. There is a list of cities Islamists/Muslims have complied (see video link below and start at the 7 minute mark) of the major cities they plan to take over first. Thus far, there are 30 of them. When Muslims take over an area it is removed from the country and becomes pat [sic] of Islam. Bumper stickers on fences and signs warn those tempted to enter this portion of the country that it is a “Shariah Controlled Zone” and “Islamic Rule [is] Enforced.” Non-Muslims had best not enter or they will be stoned…and soon, I suspect, likely worse. I believe that we have now entered into one of the final phases of this world’s history and that Islam is the Beast. Submission to it is far worse that dying by fighting against it. In the USA, truth is now being touted as “whatever Obama says it is from one day to the next depending on his mood.” We are now fighting for our lives and souls against as malicious and evil an enemy as ever walked the Earth. It’s time we started telling the real truth about it or we will be complicit in its spread. And, like locusts, Islam does devour and destroy everything it touches."

Tony #fundie henrymakow.com

I agree with all in your latest article save your remark that women are equal to men as human beings. That I see as true only if you add "before God," meaning in His judgment of human motives and actions.

...

At the establishment of the U.S. all were to be equal only before the law - and there is legitimate question as to whether or not that concept was even intended to include women. It did not include slaves. For certain, there is no such equality today as women are practically exempt from law in the northern Western Hemisphere. []


For Christians, Adam was given Eve as a help to him, not as an independent person to do as she would on her own...As soon as she deserted that role to make her own decision she was easily seduced by the devil and thus doomed mankind to misery on earth.

Whether that story is literal or figurative, it should be obvious, at least to Christians, that women were meant to be under the dominion of their men...Men were expected to be considerate of their wives, with good treatment of them. The implication being that men have a choice. Women, on the other hand, were to love and obey their husbands. These are not demands upon equals.

notreallyinceliswear #sexist reddit.com

Friendly reminder that Elliot Rogers was a whiny little fakecel edgelord faggot who just wanted attention.

Nobody ever cared because he was an actual waste of a human being.

That faggot was the worst and whiniest kind of volcel. "Unrealistic standards" gets tossed around a lot but he was delusional and unwilling to settle for anything less than a 10/10 blonde California Stacy.

But of course he's one of the first names brought up when normies reference incels, because that fits their narrative better than hundreds of quiet loners who never hurt a fly until they rope before they hit 30.

The Greater Picture #crackpot #ufo #magick thegreaterpicture.com

Avatar

At the end of 2009, the movie "Avatar" directed by James Cameron premiered. The movie received rave reviews worldwide and managed unheard of box-office success. From the "Making of"-videos it became apparent that there were a few remarkable sides to the conceptualization of this movie, that up until now have gone almost unreported. James Cameron himself didn't pay much attention to it.

Producer Jon Landau tells in one of the videos that James Cameron received the script for Avatar in 1995 in a dream. Just a bit further (2) two designers say that it seemed like Cameron didn't make up the world of Avatar, but he remembered it: "This wasn’t like a world that he was making up. It was something he had seen and now was reporting back to us. I think he has been there. He wrote a travel log about it, and he brought it back for us to recreate."

Astral traveling

It seems impossible that Cameron really has been on another planet. But when you evolve spiritually, you learn that the spirit is capable of traveling separate from the physical body, even to higher dimensions. Through meditation, but also through hypnosis, regression therapy or remote viewing for example, the spirit can take a look at places where one physically can't be present at that moment.

In messages that come to us from higher dimensions, like channelings, it's often mentioned that our spirit also makes all kinds of journeys during sleep. Sometimes to the most extraordinary places, like heaven, other planets or spaceships. Often this happens with a purpose, for example at the invitation of a higher entity. This can be a guide or the spirit of a deceased loved one that wants to teach you something or make something clear. Unlike in meditation, we usually forget dream experiences when we wake up again. Only extremely clear and impressive dreams stay with us.

The questions that arise are: is the world of Pandora based on an actual existing planet, and was James Cameron's spirit taken there in his sleep?

Alpha Centauri

Another notable aspect of Avatar is that the world where the story takes place, Pandora (3), is a moon in the constellation of Alpha Centauri. This double star is in reality the closest neighbour to our sun in the Milky Way.

From the 'black ops'-circuit we know that Alpha Centauri is one of the extaterrestrial places that has already been visited by people from Earth. Not through many long years of space traveling like in the movie, but through stargates. Some time ago, whistleblower, Arthur Neumann (also known under his alias 'Henry Deacon') reported that there are three planets around Alpha Centauri that are being inhabited by humanoids (4). One is a desert planet where latino-like people live, but the other two are worlds full of tropical vegetation. Beautiful, dark-green people live there, he said. The women of this species look a little bit Mediterranean, with dark hair. They mainly communicate telepathically.

This shows remarkable resemblances with Avatar (only the colour is different). So again the question arises: could there be more truth to the world of Avatar than we think? Did James Cameron's spirit actually get a guided tour on one of the planets or moons around Alpha Centauri?

And if so, why? Was Avatar intended to prepare us for the time that's coming, a time of love and spirituality, and living together in harmony with nature? Was it also maybe to test the waters to see how much mankind had opened at this time to the existence of humanoids living on other planets?

We can only take a guess at it. At least it's encouraging to know that the response to Avatar was overwhelming worldwide, and also that the phenomenon of channeling, a different view on God and a 'un-Hollywood-like' approach to aliens, were effortlessly accepted.

No doubt this movie has done our collective consciousness a lot of good.

Closer than you think

To conclude: after the premiere of Avatar there were reports in the media of people contemplating the thought of suicide (5) because they found the world of the Na'vi so beautiful that they didn't feel at home anymore in the harsh world we're living in here.
How amazed will those people be in the near future, when they find out that man already has access to such worlds. And not only on other planets, but even 700 miles deep beneath our own feet!

Linda Dillon/Council of Love #moonbat #crackpot #magick counciloflove.com

Linda Dillon is a spiritual thought leader, teacher of life mastery and personal development, and a high-frequency catalyst. Her soul mission is to help empower you with the tools, experience, and understanding you need to create a life with no limits. She has a unique gift to identify and eradicate the unconscious programs that undermine success—instantly amplifying her client’s ability to live freely and thrive.

The Council of Love is God’s sacred alliance composed of angels, archangels, enlightened saints, the apostles, the Unified Forces of the Outer Galaxies, and the ascended masters. The purpose of the Council is the transmission of the Divine Radiance and Love into the hearts of all beings who wish to align and receive. The Council are messengers of the One and the message is Love. The primary messenger for the Council is Archangel Gabrielle.

As the vehicle for the Council, Linda channels the vibration of pure Love into the hearts of those who work with her. Over the years Linda has developed Council classes on the 13th Octave; How To Create; How to Channel; Joy; Wisdom Vision and the healing modality of the 13th Octave LaHoChi. She has channeled hundreds of inspirational meditations which create clearing, healing, and expansion within the hearts of the listener.

Linda channels Jesus Sananda, Universal Mother Mary, and Yahweh, as well as many of the Ascended Masters such as the Buddha, Kwan Yin, Lao Tzu, St. Germaine, Sanat Kumara and Maitreya, the Apostles, and the Archangels Gabrielle, Michael, Raphael, Uriel, and Jophiel. While the energies and personalities of each being are unique, the vibration of Love, pure and simple, remains consistent.

Edmund_Kemper #sexist incels.co

[Cope] [Personalitypill] Women can easily detect your personality muh body language muh social cues muh blah blah blah

First, I’m gonna debunk some dumb arguments by IT

My god their arguments are so fucking pathetic.

muh body language. What body language do they think we fuckin use? We use normal everyday body language that everyone uses when women are nearby. We’re mostly just having our whole body relaxed and normal they prolly assume we clench our fists and stare aggressively.

muh language. We don’t even use incel slang irl and the idea that we have evil tones of voices when talking is retarded. Most of us act like typical bluepillers irl. Not hard at all to hide your tone of voice.

muh social cues

I can assure these fucking faggots that if anyone irl knew we use incels.co, all of them would be shocked. I’ve acted like a typical bluepiller in front of others. Most of them act friendly to me and think I’m genuinely bluepilled. And most women who I had to talk to because they’re a tutor or a office worker had no fucking clue that I’m “evil” because I act completely normal with them and act calm as fuck. What do they think I do, make offensive jokes and use weird language? I act as bluepilled as every retard irl does. If ITmet me irl they’d have NO clue that I’m Edmund_Kemper. And also many of us are socially isolated and don’t have anyone around us to talk to and go to a community college or home where people are anti social so this whole body language mental gymnastics is retarded.
If women can detect bad personalities, date rape, domestic abuse etc would never happen.
And even Ted bundy would’ve never deceived his victims
and these fags think we actually discuss inceldom or feminism or politics irl when we usually don’t. And when one guy I have as a social coach brought it up with me sometimes I act bluepilled as hell
And then these retards use anecdotal fallacy “because this one incel I knew” like as if one represents all
and no IT none of us stare at foids. How do they know we stare at foids? How do they know we act aggressive towards women. Most women I’ve met act normal around me (no don’t accuse me of bragging I mean they act like whatever around me like they do around anyone else)

and how the fuck do they know what humor we enjoy. The only people who know our sense of humor are close friends not foids we never speak to
Also aren’t depressed people able to hide their depression, but blackpillers can’t hide their blackpilldom?

Alright now that was a copy and paste of a comment I made on here

now let me show you guys something

if incels can’t hide their personalities, why do rapists succeed at it? Most rape Victims are raped by someone they know, like an intimate partner, friend, acquaintance, relative, etc. Many of them probably trusted the rapist, yet it happened. I’ve read that many rapists have hostile feelings about women and are misogynistic yet they successfully hide it. Many date rape victims had no idea that their date would rape them. Have these ITcels looked up rape by deception as well? Also, 93% of child molestation victims are molested by someone they know and trust and who the family trusts, yet only 38% of child molestation victims report the molester and many times people don’t know about it. Child molesters hid their personality.

Studies show that 5%-% of men are rapists and that 54% of college athletes have admitted to perpetrating some form of sexual coercion. We all probably have been friends with a rapist and had no idea he was one, because he successfully hides it.

Also, many domestic abusers hide the fact that they’re a potential domestic abuser when starting a relationship before the abuse begins, so domestic abusers hide it too, and many times when abuse happens, nobody will know about it and in public, the domestic abuser easily hides it, so many don’t find out. And many closeted Homos hide it (many times we can tell they’re gay but many times we can’t).

Also studies show that rapists often do have consensual sex and in fact have much more consensual sex than non rapists and are much more sexually active and successful than non rapists

also many people with depression hide it and many times nobody knows they’re depressed. A chad in my hs roped and people were shocked because he was always smiling and happy. But he was depressed. Robin Williams also hid his depression and nobody knew he was depressed. The world was shocked when he roped.

Ted bundy tricked his victims and hid the fact that he was a murderer.

British People's Party #conspiracy bpp.org.uk

[Conclusion of an article titled "The Holocaust Happened"]

We could describe the mass rapes and killings that took place in Berlin. The millions who were still in forced British labour camps long after the war. The emptying of large parts of eastern Germany of entire populations. The fire raids on Dresden that killed over 100,000 women and children in a designated Red Cross city. The random shooting down of any prisoner caught in SS uniform. The thousands of men and women who comitted suicide rather than face the horrors of occupation..only lack of space prevents us listing THOUSANDS of recorded incidents. We could speak about the innocent men and women dragged before ILLEGAL war crimes tribunals of which Nuremberg was only one. Yes we can admit the Holocaust. The Holocaust perpetrated by the Internationalist controlled Allied powers, acting on the orders of their World Masters - the eternal Dominators from whom the order went out "exterminate the German people!"

Tamquam #fundie occidentinvicta.com

Absolutely agree about the use of language. Once the issue is framed it hard to reframe. So taking the initiative with language is vital to shaping the thought, if not of the interlocutor, at least of the witnesses to the discussion. So here are a few humble suggestions:
fascist mind meld; social justice borg; collectivist thought police; socialist barbarian; leftist leech; monolithic diversity; elitist tolerance; self styled aristocrat; purveyor of failure; dispenser of poverty; inventor of faux facts; font of lies; hater of culture; cornucopia of misery; enemy of good (love, joy, truth, etc.); champion of the inane; whine privilege; envy elite; lover of slavery; architect of confusion; never saw an opportunity he didn’t rejoice to blame someone else for taking; and so on. In any discussion it would be important to make the accusation FIRST as any riposte comes off as weaker. So for example if you are pretty sure that white privilege will be thrown your way, circle inside their OODA loop and accuse them of white envy, or of hating whites. Hell, if they don’t like the fact that we broke quite a few eggs (mostly our own) to make Western Civ they can give us back our cars, air conditioners and washing machines and see how they get along without these symbols of phoney oppression. “Check your privilege!” I say, “Kiss my privilege.” Slaps his rump.

Thomas S #racist answers.yahoo.com

I honestly think deep down inside, every one has some racist in themself. K i'll admit im racist against indians. I think people with turbans, dots on their heads, people that talk like they work at 711, you know that weird accent that you can barely understand. I am not afraid to be racist, 99% of indians are all nerds, weak, skinny arms, skinny, no muscle, losers etc. The list goes on forever. Also, OMFG, they STINK! WTF do they bathe in curry every night, i mean seriously, holy crap, they stink! DAMNNN! tell me why you are racist against indians, if you are!

Pastor Chick Salliby #fundie wordandprayer.org


I was 22 years old and lived every one of those years my way. No one had more, did more, or enjoyed more laughs and good times than me. I was young, rich with life, and felt so far from eternity. Then, what I never thought could happen to me one night happened. I was 30 miles over the speed limit, the front tire blew, and as the car swerved wildly, something came up in front. I closed my eyes, there was a deafening crash, and when I opened them again, I was in Hell!
As I stood there momentarily stunned, all at once an awesome realization of what had just taken place—where I was—swept through me like a paralyzing chill. I began turning to find the direction I came in; I ran madly to get out, but soon all hope was gone. As I dropped down, exhausted, staring deeply into the unearthly blackness all around me, one thought passed slowly through my mind—all I had ever gained in life as a rebel, as a sinner, was already not worth it.
I don’t know how long I’ve been here since. Never has a place been more real or I more conscious. I feel like I’m at the bottom of a sewer pit of all that is foul and ugly. I choke in the stench of it. Feelings of hopelessness and painful loneliness burn me within, while towering flames burn me without. I have no defense, even courage is momentary; I cower into a little ball, grit my teeth, and never stop crying.
Everything here is so violent. A lifetime of pain is squeezed into every moment—pain beyond the memory of pain—like thousands of knives tearing me to pieces millions of times over.
I’m constantly being pressed beyond my endurance. I haven’t strength for this torment, enough tears for this sorrow, or room in my mind for such grief such gloom. I scream for it to end, but though my mind collapses, my emotions shatter to dust, and my body, imprisoned in these flames, feels like it burns into ashes: they all reassemble to go through it again, and again, and again.
Worms come at me from everywhere. I keep trying to push them into the flames, but nothing kills them, they keep finding their way back to me. If God lifted the roof off this place and let the world look in, the entire human race would get saved in 30 seconds of time. What horrors await them.
My mind inflicts the greatest torture, as it never stops regretting. I would destroy it, but I can’t quiet it even for a moment. It constantly recalls, over and over, every second of my life on Earth. It is so real; I can’t bear to relive it again. I see, as if I were standing there again, the time my neighbor asked me to receive the Saviour and said he would pray with me. As I hopelessly look on, I scream at myself to do as he asked—“Please, fall down on your knees and pray.” But I watch the scorn I had for the Gospel come back at me, as my own proud arguments and rejections are cast into my own face. I turn away, but the vision is everywhere—tracts that I tore, Bibles I left closed, Christians I laughed at all race like a torrent through my mind.
Behind this mirage, the beauty of Christ is forever inscribed on my memory. The Jesus I long to be with, long to love—the Jesus I can never ever have. At His feet, I see the dust of life’s treasures that I chose over Him, that I sold my soul for. How I hate the person I was that put me here.
How could I have been so great a fool, so totally a traitor to myself, living for the moment, laying up nothing for the person I would eternally be, the person I am today?
Ma, where do I start? Dad, if I had only listened to you. I keep praying that you will never come here, that I will never, ever see you again. Oh God, how hopeless I am!
If I could leave this place, I would do everything and anything for Jesus Christ. When I wasn’t praying and crying in tears for the lost souls bound for these flames, I would be spreading the Gospel far and wide. I’d let nothing distract me, nothing stop me. If I could just come back there one more time, how different my life would be. I’d laugh at desire, junk life’s riches, and fear nothing on Earth but displeasing Christ. But this can never be. How hopeless I am!

Sinner, if I could only stand where you are now, with one more opportunity to cry out for God’s mercy and His precious salvation—the same salvation you hate and refuse. If I only had your chances!
How can you be so sure of yourself when there’s nothing between you and Hell but air? How can you sleep when its flames reach to your feet, when its depths hang right beneath you, anxious to swallow you up without a second’s warning for all eternity? How?
You say, “But I’ve got plenty of time. I’m young and healthy, I’ve got big plans for my future.” Future? Who promised you one? God’s not obligated to give you the next breath of air you hope to breathe. Why are you still alive then? Why aren’t you already in Hell? God’s mercy is the answer. The mercy of an angry God Whose patience you’ve tried, Who can take you out of the world a million different ways, permits you to dangle from your string, to live your life way out on the very edge of eternity.
How totally deceived you are. Behind all of life’s thrills, I can see so clearly what you’re so blind to there, the deceiving Serpent, the slithering crawling snake, hiding behind the camouflage of all you crave. I hear his call in the songs, his laughter in the night life, his evil eyes flash at you in the glitter of all you touch. You have one thing he wants more than anything on Earth: your eternal soul. And, piece by piece, you give it to him. In exchange, he gives you cheap thrills and petty trinkets, like someone feeding swill to a pig he’s fattening for slaughter.
Sinner, you’re doomed. Christ reaches out to you and you turn Him away. His blood flows free to cleanse you and you run from it. You are the laughing stock of demons.
“But I’m free,” you say, “my own person,” and they laugh louder because they see the snake who owns you coiling tighter around you, strangling you in bondage, dragging you to the pit. I’ll see you soon.

"A Letter From Hell" by Pastor Chick Salliby

TheGuyJudasKilled #fundie reddit.com

The homosexual issue is one of the most pointless, idiotic, asinine, non-nonsensical movement period. For some reason being gay is now seen as being a type of person and not what it really is....a fucking sexual fetish!

Your right, the world is shitting itself and no one is calling out the foul smell of it period. Just yesterday I read a report about how dolphins are commiting mass suicide by beaching themselves, like WTF!

Yet, we have to have a massive convo about gay men and women who want a new gender to be categorized and legislated by law or else. The collapse is near and I'm quite positive everyone sees the writing on the wall....