Similar posts

prophetman #fundie uselectionatlas.org

I doubt if anyone here knows what you're talking about. And, I doubt very seriously if YOU know what you're talking about.

African Americans are depicted as "the ten horns" in Daniel and in Revelation.
In fact, their whole history is recorded in the book of Daniel.

They're the ten horns upon Babylon in Rev.17.
And, they're the ten horns in Rev.13.

Hell, if all we had to go by was Rev.13, we'd know that African Americans are that ten-horn beast!

African Americans had a wound caused by slavery. America healed that slavery wound, and today the whole world wonders after (idolizes) them.

An image has been created of African Americans, which causes all; the small and great, the rich and poor, and the free and bond in America to receive and accept them.

They have to be worshipped (given preferencial treatment) in America's schools and universities (the forehead), in the workplace (the right hand), and in all places of business (that buy and sell).

Their name is "the ten horns", and their number is 600, 60, and 6.
You have to multiply by 10 (by the ten horns) to get those numbers.

Thus, when you multiply the ten horns by 6 you'll get the number 60. And, when you multiply the ten horns by 60 you'll get 600.
And, when you multiply the ten horns by 600 you'll get 6000, and so forth and so on.

See?! That wasn't so hard, was it?!!

--

POSTER'S NOTE: I couldn't figure out if this was more FSTDT or RSTDT, but I went with Fundie.

Louie Gohmert #wingnut cbs7.com

WASHINGTON (KWTX) – U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Tyler, introduced a resolution Thursday that calls on the U.S. House to bar Democrats from the chamber because of the party’s historical ties to slavery and racism unless the party is renamed.

The resolution, introduced in response to the Democratic-backed push to remove Confederate-era symbols and statues from the U.S. Capitol, isn’t likely to gain much traction in the Democratic-controlled U.S. House, however.

“Efforts by Democrats to destroy all public traces of their own history of supporting slavery, the Confederacy, and segregation in an attempt to shift blame onto Republicans must no longer go unchallenged,” Gohmert wrote in an article published on the conservative Breitbart website.

“It is time for Democrats to play by their own rules, and accept the standards they have forced onto everyone else. They must divest themselves of their name that has denied so many the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

Gohmert points out the Democratic Party, the country’s oldest existing political party, defended the rights of states in the years before the Civil War to decide the issue of slavery for themselves and supported the expansion of slavery into U.S. territories.

After the Civil War the party resisted Reconstruction-era measures from a Republican-controlled Congress to protect the civil and voting rights of blacks and by the mid-1870s Democratic-controlled state legislatures in the South managed to roll back reforms and implement Jim Crow Laws, suppressing black voting rights for decades.

Democrats pivoted in the 1960s, however.

After Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965, he told his aide, Bill Moyers, “I think we just delivered the South to the Republican Party for a long time to come.”

Southern support for the Republican Party grew through the 1970s and 1980s, fueled in part by evangelical support for the party’s stand on such social and cultural issues as abortion.

Gohmert’s resolution calls on the speaker of the House to “remove any item that names, symbolizes or mentions any political organization or party that has ever held a public position that support slavery or the Confederacy from any area within the House wing of the Capitol or any House office building, and shall donate any such item or symbol to the Library of Congress” and says “Any political organization or party that has ever held a public position that supported slavery or the Confederacy shall either change its name or be barred from participation in the House of Representatives.”

steve #fundie triablogue.blogspot.com

i) From a secular standpoint, Tony needs to explain why owning slaves is morally wrong:

a) To begin with, many secular thinkers admit that atheism leads to moral relativism or moral nihilism.

b) In addition, secularism has a very reductionist view of humans. We're just animals. Temporary, fortuitous organizations of matter. So even if an atheist could get over the first hurdle (are there objective moral norms?), why is it wrong to enslave a human animal?

ii) The fact that Biblical law regulates slavery doesn't necessarily mean the Bible condones slavery. Law codes aren't ethical ideals. They simply set a floor for social mores. A minimal standard for what's socially intolerable. The law is not a substitute for moral and spiritual renewal.

iii) There were basically two reasons for "slavery" in the OT. One was for captured enemy combatants. Well, what's the alternative? If you defeat the enemy on the battlefield today, but let the defeated soldiers go home, you have to keep fighting the same battle. So that leaves you with two practical alternatives: (a) execute them or (b) subjugate them.

iv) The other reason was insolvency. Indentured service is no fun, but it's preferable to starvation.

v) As Richard Bauckham discusses in The Climax of Prophecy, Rev 18 is a searing indictment of an economy based on forced labor.

Witchwind #sexist witchwind.wordpress.com

UTOPIA: what would a women’s society look like?

I haven’t been writing in a while, and it’s not because I don’t like writing any more but things have accelerated elsewhere in my life and I can’t be involved everywhere at once. As this isn’t paid work, obviously I can’t afford to put blogging first.

Anyway, there are still many posts waiting to be finished. In the meantime, I’ll start another one.

I often muse about all the things that we’d need to change about patriarchy if we abolished men’s rule over women and the earth. Everything and every single aspect of social organisation is so much the opposite of how it should be, it’s dizzying to even begin to think about all the things we should stop / change.

Mostly it’s about men stopping from doing harm. But stopping men isn’t enough because beyond that there is the entire world to relearn, to heal, and our entire society to rebuild. We would be faced with the immense task of replacing all the misogynist, genocidal, biocidal practices men have ordered our society with for eons. So many of us now are acculturated, cut from land, nature and from one another.

If we managed to overcome men’s tyranny over us, how would we rebuild our world? I just want to throw some ideas here that I often come across these days. I dream for concrete, down-to-earth, simple and easily applicable measures of stepping out of patriarchy into a female-loving, biophilic world. This isn’t by any means a realistic plan of how to achieve it, but just reading it makes me feel happy. It makes it feel more real, more possible. Enjoy!

SOCIAL STRUCTURES

Men’s position in society

Before we do anything, the very first measure to adopt is to take all men out of all positions of decision-making immediately, and actually out of any kind of social, professional position whatsoever.

Major serial killers, serial torturers, pimps, pornographers, severe domestic abusers, serial rapists, genocide planners, biocide planners and pedocriminals across the world will simply be euthanised: the decisions will be taken by women in a mass world tribunal for patriarchal crimes. This is by far the best solution, and is the most legitimate, ethical way of reducing male population to more reasonable levels. Such men would otherwise forever pose a threat to women, children, animals, the earth and society as a whole, and we know they have no chance of ceasing their violent behaviour after having reached such an advanced stage of sadism and sociopathy. It would be reckless to spend space, resources and energy in keeping them alive in prisons.

All of men’s (alive and euthanised) belongings, property, resources and land will be confiscated from men and handed back to female care and supervision – property rights over land will be abolished. You can’t own land!

All men at least above 15 (or younger if very asocial) should live separately from women and children, on their own in small huts or studios, isolated from one another and scattered around so that women can keep an eye on them (they should never be in groups or packs, that would be illegal). So it would also be illegal for male adults to impose their presence on females, girls and children. Men would have to care for themselves on their own: food, laundry, etc. No male above his age of puberty would be allowed to receive any kind of service from a female. Their life expectancy would probably drop to the age of 40, but that’s how things should be. Women’s life expectancy without men would rise to 130 years at least.

PIV would be illegal too of course, as well as the initiation of any verbal or physical contact to women and girls or boy children, unless solicited by a woman for specific matters. I’m not sure what to do about boy children. Obviously you know my opinion, but let’s say that’s up to the mother to decide what she wants to do before he turns of age to leave the female family circle.

In order to keep all men and post-pubescent boys busy, we’d send them to clean up the vast amounts of detritus, pollution and toxic wastes men have littered and almost killed the world with. Much of the damage to the earth is irreversible, however with a great deal of effort and genius, women will find sustainable, natural and simple ways of healing a lot of the damage men have caused, and send men off to do the dirty work. No man will be allowed to take any decision without female guidance. We know what happens when men decide on their own! DISASTER.

Family, child-raising and reproduction

Fathers’ rights will cease to exist. There is no such thing as fatherhood — as we all know, it’s a myth. Men will necessarily lose all and any power to dominate and control women’s reproductive capacities.

It’s the inalienable right of each woman to control every phase of her reproduction and life creation. Abortion will be possible at any stage of pregnancy, however there will hardly be such a thing as undesired pregnancy since there won’t be any men forcing pregnancies on us any more. Abortion will nonetheless be recognised for the trauma, mutilation and loss of life that it is. The number of children and human population will naturally decrease to sustainable levels, so will the number of males born. Women will be free to experiment parthenogenesis or procreation with two female eggs.

The nuclear family will be abolished, in particular the parent’s property rights and absolute power over her child. Children will be considered as persons in need for autonomy and all form of punishment, authority or educational manipulation over children will equally be abolished. Raising and caring for children will be a collective responsibility for women, and motherhood / childcare and especially capacity to be empathetic towards children will be taken very seriously, as something that needs to be (re)learned and studied over years before being fully competent for this immense task.

Schools as we know them as punitive reclusion centres for grooming into male domination and female subordination (as well as selection system for elite executors of patriarchal institutions) will be abolished. Boys would definitely not be around the girls, certainly not most of the time, and never beyond the age of puberty. And obviously no adult male would be allowed near children.

There will be no such thing as “teachers” with positions of authority over children. “Guiders” could learn also from the children or students as much the students from them. We’d learn anything we’d want from languages to sciences to art to music to medicine to building to witchcraft to swimming (etc) without restriction of age or time, as long as it’s adapted to our capacities, level and availability. Learning would be autonomous, with guidance when needed, instead of enforced and dictated. They’d be no need for external reward, marking or punishment because the process of learning in itself is so rewarding and fascinating that it’s self-sufficient. Anyway I could go on and on, non-patriarchal learning is truly riveting.

Social structures between women.

All relationships of authority, domination and subordination will be abolished between all women of all ages. We will be able to recognise each other’s strengths, expertise, guidance and capacities (or lack of) without it implying superiority, inferiority, veneration or lack of respect. We would find each other beautiful. We would live our friendships, love and affection for women unhindered.

MEN’S INSTITUTIONS

All oppressive male institutions will be abolished after men have been retrieved from them. We obviously won’t keep these institutions. They will return to the nothingness that they belong, just as a distant, bad memory.

Military:

No more military, no more army, no more wars! It would be illegal for men to hold weapons. Global peace would be the immediate consequence. Most weapons will be destroyed (or recycled into something else), such as weapons of mass destruction, anti-personnel mines, tanks, machine guns, all manners of terrestrial, marine and air-bombers, and all the many disgusting things men have invented. For the remaining weapons such as guns or blades, women will hold exclusive right of use over them in order to defend ourselves from men, from the risk of them taking power over us again.

State:

States, borders, nations, laws would be abolished and totally dispensed with. Laws mentioning the number of prohibited acts will be kept for men only. Women do not need laws to contain ourselves. Laws were created by the male elite to protect their property from other men. Laws are rigid and static, that’s because their purpose is to hold existing patriarchal powers in place. Our own society would be in constant evolution, improvement, creative renewal, yet grounded in reality and adapted to our needs and circumstances.

Women would be able to move freely.

Societal structures and decision-making assemblies wouldn’t exceed roughly 300 women (representing no more than themselves). Keeping numbers low for cooperation is important because the greater the size of the unit, the more horizontal cooperation becomes difficult and requires vertical hierarchy. Possibilities for peaceful, cooperative organisation between women are infinite – as long as they respect the individual integrity of every female – the group should never weigh over the individual but be a source for support and efficient organisation of collective life and space. There could easily be associations of exchange between different groups and peoples in order for women to cooperate regionally and globally where necessary. There would be no limit in age of participation in decision-making for women and girls, which means adapting the format to different ages and capacities.

Medicine:

Men would be permanently banned from any kind of medical practice. All woman-hating, genocidal institutions such as gynecology, psychiatry, obstetrics, big pharma, the torture of living beings in the name of “scientific experimentation” will be banned. Men’s fragmented, objectifying, sadistic view the human body will be part of history, replaced by biophilic medicine. Medical science will no longer be monopolised by a small elite but available to all at any age where appropriate. The (female) doctor’s role will be to guide the patient in her own healing, never to exercise authority over her or take decisions at her expense. Special healing spaces (where surgery is necessary, etc) will be so nice, warm and welcoming that just being there will make you feel better. The soul and life conditions of a person will always be considered part of the body, and symptoms will always be understood in a holistic way. There will be no more chemical, synthetic and toxic products with often worse side effects than the illness itself it claims to heal.

Perfect health would be the normal state of women anyway, as we will learn by experience and observation what we should eat and do to stay healthy at all seasons and times. Most women will have rediscovered our healing, divination and extra-sensory communication powers.

Religion:

Patriarchal religions will crumble down with men’s oppressive system. Religious ideologies, along with its hierarchies and vacuous rituals will cease to exist. I believe a woman’s world would be spiritual. Spiritual connection isn’t based on faith but on critical observation and experience, on a real personal connection to the elements, beings and spirits that surround us, and on the real magnetic power of beings.

Economy (tied to ecology):

Obviously, Slavery, men’s exploitation of women, men’s capitalist systems will be abolished too. The most important aspect of male economy is that it’s based on men’s competitive accumulation of resources (by killing, destroying, commodifying, taking control over, extracting the greatest possible amount of life) and based on production of poisonous, addictive, programmed obsolescent goods — in order to win the patriarchal game of achieving greater domination over women and girls.

This necrophilic relationship to the world and the environment will be abolished, to be replaced by biophilic ecological and economic principles. This will encompass every single process of our life activities, from house building, to food consumption, to communication, travelling, furniture making, cooking, etc. They will have to be carefully designed and thought out in a way as to never endanger the survival of any species, never pollute any environment, never require the use of poisonous, non-recyclable materials, never to require indentured labour or exploitation in order to be maintained. This would obviously impact the nature and scale of our activities. “Work” (exploitation and division of labour) as we know it would disappear. It would be the responsibility of each individual or group to sustain herself more or less autonomously.

We should learn to observe our environment and deeply understand the interconnectedness of all beings around us, as well our own impact before deciding whether or how to transform it. Our lives have no more or no less value than those of a rabbit, fly, tree, plant, fish, seashell or stone. For instance, if we pick leaves of some plants, it’s important not to rip the whole plant off, to take only parts of it so it can grow again. Or to only take a few plants (or seashells, whatever) where there are many, so to respect the survival of the species where it is settled. If we cut trees to build our house, replant them. There are also infinite ways of making the most of materials for energy, food or production while using it as efficiently as possible. Building houses in ways that don’t require heating in winter or cooling in the summer. It is now widely known that energy such as electricity can be infinitely renewable if we use wind power, magnetic power, water power… And everything can be made DIY.

We will learn to be autonomous again and make our own clothes, food, furniture, houses, soaps, detergent products – or maybe someone else will make them but most things can be handmade and it’s so much more rewarding.

In a biophilic world, nothing is garbage, nothing is pollution. Everything is conceived so as to be part of a life cycle. This doesn’t mean we should keep the same toothbrush for 50 years or never improve on our machines, technology and infrastructure, but there’s no such thing as a dump, or toxic spilling. All materials should be harmless, recyclable or biodegradable, given back the earth if we no longer need them.

Industrial agriculture and farming:

Genetic modification of plants, pesticides, monoculture, field ploughing and consequent aridification of the land will be considered criminal. Our right to self-sustenance would no more be confiscated by mega food corporations – as they will no longer exist.

Agriculture should always be small-scale, local, and as much as possible be modelled on wildlife, self-growing / self-renewing conditions (the less work and intervention, the better), and especially be conceived so as to nourish and sustain rather than deplete wildlife and environmental balance. Again, possibilities are infinite, we have so much to learn.

And seriously, killing animals you’ve raised yourself in a farm or keeping animals enclosed is cruel. I’m for the liberation of all farm and domestic animals. It’s up to them to decide whether they want to live with us or not, and they should be able to come and go freely. Maybe after a few decades, after the human population has stalled, male population has decreased, and after we’ve made serious efforts for reforestation and restoration of wildlife on the earth, it would probably be fairer to hunt animals occasionally. Right now, given the extinction rate of animal species, I find it criminal to hunt or fish. We don’t need to eat that much meat anyway.

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

HOW ZIONISTS TRICKED USA INTO WORLD WAR I

THE SETTING

Hoping to draw the United States into the "Great War" (World War I), British Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill had, in May, 1915, engineered the sinking of The Lusitania. As the munitions-laden liner approached British waters, the British Mad Dog called off the ship's escorts so that a German U-boat could torpedo the sitting duck. About 1,200 passengers and crew were killed, including about 100 Americans. Needless to say, the doomed passengers knew nothing of the dangerously explosive contraband that was being secretly transported from New York to London.

But it was not yet time for America to enter the brutal war. Not only did President Woodrow Wilson have a re-election to win in 1916, but certain other pieces had yet to be put in place -- one being the internal overthrow of the "anti-Semitic" Russian Tsar (allied with Britain & France), and the other, well, we will get to that shortly.

Contrary to what most people think, the May 1915 sinking of Lusitania did not bring America into the war -- although the memory of the event was indeed resurrected for propaganda purposes two years later.

As 1915 drew to a close, the war, though now at a stalement, found the aggressor Allied powers of Britain, France and Russia clearly on “the short end of the stick” in their unprovoked war against the Central Powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Ottoman Turkey. Not one square inch of German territory had been captured and the disastrous, 8-month-long French-English campaign in the Turkish Dardanelles (Gallipoli Campaign / April 1915 – January 1916) was ending in a humiliating retreat, soon to be followed by a political upheaval in Britain.

Though it cost him his job and earned him the scorn of both his peers and the British public, Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill's inexplicable folly in Turkey actually had a hidden motive -- as we shall soon see.

SYKES-PICOT

Given the disadvantageous position in which the Allies now found themselves in on all fronts, one would think they would be licking their wounds and reassessing the standing peace offer that Germany and friends had on the table at all times. Instead, the British and French, with the assent of Russia, negotiated a secret agreement for dividing up the very same Turkish Empire that had just handed them a humiliating and historical ass-kicking that is still celebrated in Turkey, and remembered in Britain. The negotiation of the Sykes-Picot treaty occurred between November 1915 and March 1916, and was signed in May, 1916.

How strange for the losing parties in a war to be secretly re-drawing the map of the winning party? What made Britain & France believe, after the bloody hiding they had just suffered in the Dardanelles, that they could succeed the next time around in Turkey -- to say nothing of the impossibility of defeating mighty Germany?! Wouldn’t it make more sense to talk about border rewrites after the war is won – a seemingly impossible scenario by this time.

The Sykes-Picot Agreement amounted to counting chickens before they were hatched. What made Sir Mark Sykes (UK) and Francois Georges-Picot (FRA) believe that they were going to win a war that they were losing? Did they have psychic powers? -- Or did they already know something, in early 1916, that the American people did not?

ZIONIST-BRITISH ALLIANCE

Unless Germany could be knocked out – which would allow for a massive southward diversion of Allied troops to attack Turkey again – the Allies had little chance of conquering the Turkish Empire. Surely, they must have known this. And so, what can possibly explain this supreme, arrogant, and seemingly delusional confidence in total victory on the part of the Allies? In order to answer that question, we must understand the nature of other secret agreements that had previously taken place.

The land of Palestine (95% Arab populated / 5% Jewish) was under Turkish rule. But the Zionists of Europe wanted it for a “Jewish State”. The war was their opportunity to have Britain grab it for them! Zionism was first discussed at a British Cabinet level in November, 1914 -- just four days after Britain's declaration of war on the Ottoman Empire.

In a discussion after the meeting with Zionist Herbert Samuel, Chancellor of the Exchequer Lloyd George assured him that "he was very keen to see a Jewish state established in Palestine." Samuel then outlined his Zionist aspirations for the establishment in Palestine of a Jewish state, and of the importance of its geographical position to the British Empire.

Samuel's memoirs state:

"I mentioned that two things would be essential—that the state should be neutralized, since it could not be large enough to defend itself, and that the free access of Christian pilgrims should be guaranteed. ... I also said it would be a great advantage if the remainder of Syria were annexed by France, as it would be far better for the state to have a European power as neighbour than the Turk."

Prime Minister H. H. Asquith later announced in a speech that the dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire had become a war aim:

"It is the Ottoman Government, and not we who have rung the death knell of Ottoman dominion not only in Europe but in Asia."

THE AMERICAN CONNECTION

In January 1915, Samuel submitted a Zionist memorandum entitled The Future of Palestine to the Cabinet after discussions with Chaim Weizmann and Lloyd George. In February 1915, Samuel, wrote:

"...it might be possible to neutralize the country under international guarantee ... and to vest the government of the country in some kind of Council to be established by the Jews."

Now, what does all of this 1914-1915 back-room dirty dealing between the British and the Zionists have to do with the strange confidence in ultimate victory manifested in the Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916, you ask? It’s not as if the scattered Jews of Europe had any military power to contribute to the fight against Germany, Austria-Hungary and Turkey. Ah, but the Zionists did have military power to contribute to the Allied cause – from across the sea. What the British could not achieve with the Lusitania disaster, the Zionists could get done easily!

Installed through the Jewish-rigged 3-Party election of 1912, the American President Woodrow Wilson was owned by the Zionists of America. Giants such as Bernard Baruch, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, Samuel Untermeyer, and Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis controlled Wilson just as surely as men like Haim Saban and George Soros control Obongo and Hillary today. The power of these dominant men, as well as the influence of the Jewish-owned New York Times and the Piranha Press, could, at the “push of a button”, bring the young super-power into the war at anytime – and the British knew it all along.

[...]

PUPPET WILSON SCAMS AMERICA

After the 1916 re-election of Wilson, anti-German propaganda exploded across the American (Jewish) press, culminating with a Declaration of War in April, 1917 (just 18 days after the Tsar had abdicated). Actual U.S. entry into the war, however, did not occur until Spring, 1918, a few months after the Balfour deal had been finally put to paper and announced. You see, the Jews were no fools. Back-room verbal deals weren't enough. They wanted something tangible, in writing, addressed to a Rothschild, before the now "at-war" Americans would actually begin firing.

The 1918 entry of the U.S. turned the tide against Germany and Austria-Hungary, while freeing-up the European Allies to divert forces southward for the eventual Sykes-Picot dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire, and the establishment of the pro-Jewish "British Mandate" over occupied Palestine.

Once the British finally put the dirty deal in writing (Balfour), "neutral" America activated its forces in Europe. With the help of vicious atrocity propaganda, formerly pro-German America turned anti-German overnight!

So you see, the Wilsonian lies that you were taught in high school history about America entering World War I for the noble purpose of "making the world safe for democracy" were all just cooked-up bits of barf. The Allies knew all along that America was destined to enter the war on their side, once the right deals were finalized with the Globo-Zionists bosses who engineered the whole tragedy.

The unfolding of history over the past 100 years makes it clear that Globalism (New World Order) and Zionism were, by pre-meditated design, the big winners from World Wars I & II. Without U.S. entry into the world wars, there would never have been such a thing as "the state of Israel" -- a project which was finally completed in 1948, and has been causing new problems and new wars of expansion ever since.

That's history folks, real history, "spread like butter," as the great World War II historian David Irving would say. And the most sickening part if this tragic historical drama is that it has yet to fully play itself out.

James Poulos #dunning-kruger #crackpot americanmind.org

Genealogy of Cuckery

The value of the Sohrab Ahmari-David French saga is in what’s unearthed by the reactions it kicks up. Example: National Review Senior Editor Jay Nordlinger’s takeaway is “there’s nothing fancy or philosophical here: It’s just that David won’t bow to Trump and Trumpism, and that is what cannot be borne and must be punished.” We (you) can argue about whether this is true. I’m interested in how people could possibly believe it. It is strange to see the idea expressed aloud that nothing philosophical is at stake in the political martyrdom of an unrepentantly principled politico. Because the original idea behind Never Trumpism was that Trump was unprincipled, a “chaos candidate” who didn’t care about ideological integrity—who had no ideological integrity of his own. Now comes the meme that it is Trumpism which is dangerously principled, and French (in this case) who refuses to kneel before Zod. The details of whatever Frenchism might be are secondary—possibly irrelevant. What matters is here he stands; he can do no other. In the online era, there is something immensely inevitable-feeling about this revaluation of values. The response on the part of Never Trumpers to the charge of cuckery becomes something intended to occur to those leveling the charge as Cuck Pride. This deeply conforms to the pattern of “the discourse.” Online identity politics means alchemically converting flung poo into precious gold. You’ll recall the name for the alchemists’ substance that achieves this kind of transition: the philosopher’s stone—the legendary “elixir of life” epitomizing the transcendent bliss of pure and total knowledge. Martyrdom is morality: defeat is life. What could be a more perfect drug?

Beyond “Slave Morality”
Nordlinger and company would surely object that just as French is no cuck, he is also no martyr. He doesn’t give up, he fights—by the rules, whatever they be! A spirited gentleman willing to risk losing with personal honor, even if the honor of the system has failed! Your mileage may vary. The reason the seemingly minor and ginned-up French controversy keeps expanding is it reaches straight down to the root of foundational questions about the relation between Christian and pagan virtue in the west. Nietzsche’s most dangerous attack was on Christianity as a death wish, as an elevation of death so total that it put a lifetime of abject servility—a living “death to the world”—even above prompt extinction. But it’s interesting to consider that Nietzsche’s complex and difficult relations with women led him to a place where, by the end of his life, he had not explored the connection between his theory of the deadly servility of the Christian with the deadly servility of the cuckold. Nietzsche’s attack on Christianity is notably desexualized. Today that theme is, thanks to the internet, inescapable. It is baked into reality. Today it is a fault that “the shame is part of the kink” doesn’t appear in Nietzsche’s genealogy of morals. He won’t quite “go there” in his probes of the psychological imperative to convert erotic urges into ethical principles that defines so much of contemporary life. Our contemporary sexual psychology now leads key critics of French-style defenses of “muh principles” to trace the genealogy of today’s worship of procedural liberalism not to “slave morality,” as Nietzsche would have it, but to “cuck morality:” Yes, another man should take my wife, I should go live in the shed, it is right, it is moral, it is justice… To live rightly, I must prevent posterity from being identical with me … Nietzsche doesn’t use the pathos of that kind of “conversion experience” as a precise metaphor or emblem for the kind of willed abasement that so many right-wing critics of liberal proceduralism-worship put central. It is weird that so little has been written about how and why cuckoldry welled up from the depths of online to become the precision-targeted trope that it is, selected out of the sense that none other would be more accurate or suffice instead. Of course Christianity and cuckoldry are not good metaphors for each other. No good Christian can embrace cuckoldry. But the charge of cuckery, leveled against Christians like French, has to do with the perceived untenableness today of staking out a middle position between the Benedict Option of evacuating from fronts collapsing in the culture war and the yet-to-be-named option of reasserting powerful constitutional authority for localities to resist and reject colonization by the revolutionary vanguard of institutionalized wokeness. Because there is just no question that the aim of that institutional vanguard is to choke off America’s production of a certain kind of adult male and the architecture of social order that radiates upward from him toward the heights of authority. This project is out in the open and the reams of academic and ideological writing about its details and justifications are widely available. The metaphor of cuckoldry is selected to the exclusion of all others because nothing else quite as effectively sharpens the charge that your obsession with the details of honor and principle has in fact become fatally abstract: you are being kicked out of your own house by a rival power actively working to take away everything that is yours, your children included. You are becoming the end of your line, forever, in every respect. Yet you won’t even evacuate from your breached defenses before it’s too late. Only the heights of spiritual snobbery can explain such a choice.

From Whence the Cuck?
This is obviously a harsh critique: why do so many people believe it is justified—is necessary? Nordlinger and company are, I think, sincere in their conviction that the answer is ideological. The Trumpy folk running amok yelling cuck do so out of an imperative just as “principled,” only debasedly so, as the conservative imperatives they deride with “muh principles” jokes. The Nordlingerians do not grasp that the rise of the cuck charge is the product of changes in our social and psychological environment that supervene upon, and are independent of, ideological phenomena. One account of those changes might be that porn, which after all is possibly the most popular form of social media, is now everywhere, and this is why the attacks are cuck this and cuck that. Another, and I think more sophisticated account, is that while porn has an influence it is mere content, and the context wherein that content swims, as do we all, is our new digital environment. In that environment, the primacy of human imagination as the driver of institutional and elite rule is being totally replaced with the primacy of machine memory. In this new milieu, social order is being forcibly rearchitected away from the procedural liberal elite that mastered the globalized West through its expertise in broadcasting ethical memes. One consequence of this painful dislocating shift is an upsurge in populism and nationalism. But another is a panicked evac on the Left from the collapsing front of procedural liberalism—into what are thought to be the hardened sites of extreme institutionalized revolutionary wokeness. The irony—an alarming one, to most populists and nationalists on the Right—is that so many “principled conservatives” reject all evidence that this is happening and, as a consequence of their profound ideological denial, falsely believe that procedural liberalism is tenable in its own right. They conceive of procedural liberalism as a stronghold wherein their way of life can be sheltered without having either to abandon their position or their conceptual apparatus. French put the idea perfectly in his last exchange with Ahmari: “The only way this place survives as a united country is if we apply eighteenth-century solutions to this twenty-first century division.” The painful fact is that from the standpoint of someone who understands what digital really is and what it is really doing, this talk evinces a complete failure to comprehend the nature of the new reality unfolding around us. “Rediscover the First Amendment,” French implored. “Rediscover religious freedom.” All as the bombed-out fort of procedural liberalism is being abandoned en masse by Leftist refugees seeking shelter—however foredoomed—in a postliberal cult from which, because it is not quite a religion, the First Amendment cannot protect us.

Deep America
Without doubt, the digital age throws America into a difficult position. This alien invasion of invisible robots our technologists have touched off makes us feel as if our own creation has betrayed us, because the order of machine memory obsolesces the whole social structure of imagineering that first twinkled into being during the Enlightenment and really took off with the advent of electricity. Even more disorienting, it hauls back patterns of living that haven’t held sway since the last time recorded memory ruled the West’s psychological and sociological milieu—the middle ages. In most respects, “eighteenth-century solutions” is now an oxymoron. There is, however, some good news. Despite America’s modernist bona fides, as the 1619 Project somewhat inadvertently reminds us, the roots of our social and psychological order do extend, more or less seamlessly, back farther than we think. Medieval perceptions and sensibilities, such as the identification of “the liberal” with the unity of grammar, rhetoric, and dialectic, have not been zapped away from our collective inheritance. The fundamental divide between us incarnate human creatures and the disincarnate, animate-yet-not-alive bots does point us back toward anthropologies of justice that bridge the Middle Ages and early modernity. These resources indicate that the political philosophy of statecraft first put to work in America by the Founders does offer an alternative to both “evac” and “cuck.” But only if more Americans begin to accept that our new digital world takes many “conserved” principles and strategies off the table.

American Family Association #fundie rightwingwatch.org

(From the American Family Association's site: "AFA is a Christian organization, holds a Biblical worldview, and seeks to promote the truth found in the scripture.")

[T]he web-geniuses behind the [AFA]'s OneNewsNow site have a few other tricks up their sleeves, such as automatically replacing any use of the word “gay” with the word “homosexual” in any of the AP stories they run … leading to instances in which proper names are reformatted to meet their ridiculous standard, such as this article about sprinter Tyson Gay winning the 100 meters at the U.S. Olympic track and field trials in which he is renamed “Tyson Homosexual.”

Caamib, Elliot Rodger, various incels #sexist pastebin.com

(Caamib's translation of an article about an interview between him and German news magazine Der Spiegel in 2014)

Male, single, life-threatening

The man who killed six people in Santa Barbara in May, was a member of an obscure community: So-called Incels live involuntarily as single, and some develop a hatred of women, which can be fatal. Who are these men?

Written by Takis Strangler

Marijan says there are people in his community who hate the summer. In summer they have no choice but to see more of the women, their skin, their bare knees, tight clothes and their breasts. Marijan says he does not look at women, and he was trying to avoid places where he has to see naked female skin. He says: "If you're hungry but cannot eat, you're not going into a street fully loaded with cakes."

Marijan, 26, from Zagreb wishes a girlfried, and because he’s unable to find one, he experiences his life as a torment. He is lonely, but in his loneliness he is not alone. His community meets on the Internet.

He belongs to a group of people who answer to the moniker "Incel", which is the abbreviation for the English term "involuntary celibacy”. Marijan frequents forums in which an own culture of solitude has developed.

People who gather there are almost always men, a few hundred in total. How many there are exactly, can be difficult to estimate, there are English, German, Dutch, Australians and especially Americans.

One of them wrote in the past year on an internet forum: "One day the Incels will realize their true strength and number and overthrow the oppressive feminist system. Imagine a world in which the WOMEN FEAR YOU. "

The author of these lines was student Rodger Elliot. On 23 May this year, Rodger (22), from Santa Barbara, California, recorded a video from himself. He put the camera on the dashboard of his BMW and sat behind the wheel.

He said: "This is my last video. Tomorrow is the day of retribution. The day on which humanity will experience my retaliation. Which you all will experience. In the past eight years of my life, since I reached puberty, I was forced to endure loneliness, an existence full of rejection and unrequited desire. All just because women never felt attracted to me. In the last years I rotted in solitude. "

Now and then Rodger laughed in the camera, a handsome young man with black hair and white teeth. Through the window of his car palm trees were visible.

A short time later, he killed three fellow students in his apartment. Forensic scientists examine which weapon he used. The wounds of the corpses are not clear. The police secured fingerprints on two machetes, a knife and a hammer.

When the men were dead, Rodger took his Sig Sauer P226, his Glock 34 and two semi-automatic pistols, and went out in the neighboring community of Isla Vista. He knocked at the house of a sorority. Nobody answered him.

A few steps further on he shot two students. He went into a snackbar and shot and killed a customer. Then he climbed into his car, drove through the town and shot at passers-by, injuring 13 people.

He rammed his BMW into a cyclist, slammed into a parked car and killed himself with a shot in the head. Rodger left a few videos and a 137-page manifesto. In it are phrases like: "Women are like a plague. They are like animals, completely controlled by their animalistic instincts, and corrupt feelings and impulses. "

Many men who became lone gunmen have, as Rodger had, a sick relation with women in general. Eric Harris, one of the boys involved in the 1999 at Columbine High School shooting in the United States, killing 13 people and killed himself, wrote in his diary: "Maybe I just need to have sex. Perhaps that would change this shit. "

And his accomplice Dylan Klebold wrote: "I do not know what I do wrong with people (especially women) - it is, as if they hate me and scare me. "

During a shooting rampage in Winnenden in 2009 Tim Kretschmer killed eight female students, three female teachers and a male student in his former school.

In the same year the American George Sodini shot three women and wounded nine more, before taking his own life in a gymstudio. Previously, he had written in his blog:

"Women simply don’t like me. There are 30 million desirable women in the United States (is my estimate) - and I find none "!

These gunman leave questions:

Why people had to die? Exists there a connection between the murders and the loneliness of the perpetrators? What has this incel community from the Internet to do with the murders?

Rodger can answer no longer, and even if he could, he could hardly give any clear answers. But there are people who understand a few of his thoughts. Because they share his anger at women and his loneliness. One of them is Marijan (not his real name). You can reach him on his blog, thatincelblogger.wordpress.com.

After a few emails he agreed to meet, in Zagreb, Croatia, his hometown.

Before a pizzeria near the Cathedral a handsome young man, tall, with jet black hair and a three-day beard is waiting, he wears a white, loose T-shirt and cropped trousers.

While shaking hands he does not look one in the eyes. As he sits at a table, in the back, in a quiet corner of the restaurant, he says: "I'm going to look bad in the article, but what have I got to lose? "

He says he was angry after Rodgers rampage. The whole world again only talked about tougher gun laws. But no one thought about other reasons that drove Rodgers to his rampage. No one had thought about incel.

Marijan talks much and long. He doesn’t allow a lot of questions. It is less a conversation but rather a series of lectures, which he conducts with great precision.

Sentence after sentence, lecture to lecture, he leads the listener deeper into his world, deeper into the darkness in which there seems to be no happiness, only immeasurable hatred.

Excerpts from lecture one, subject: Women.

Women are simply designed robots with the desire to procreate. Young women in past generations always had help from their grandmother. She helped with finding a man. She said: This is a good type, he will take care of you. These grandmothers were replaced with the magazine Cosmopolitan. Today women want to marry up. They want improve their station. I would not say that we Incels hate women. But if you were rejected 50 times, then you develop negative feelings, which is normal.

Excerpts from lecture two, Topic: seduction game.

Women can now provide for themselves, so their preferences have changed from breadwinners to seducers. A minority of men has sex with the majority of women. The successful men are the Bad Boys. If you want to have a woman today, you need to become a Bad Boy and lose your ethics.

Excerpts from lecture three, theme: a better world.

I want a society in which a group of men cooperates in total trust. Each man gets a woman. The women are fairly distributed. People are monogamous and marry as a virgin. If a man wants sexual diversity, he goes to a prostitute. Feminists would be made prostitutes in this society. When a man tries to seduce multiple woman, he is killed instantly.

Marijan and other Incels meet on various forums on the Internet. the forum, that Elliot Rodger used, is now closed. Another is a relatively moderate forum called love-shy.com. The members speak there about topics such as pick-up lines, plastic surgery and other ways to escape their despair.

The users of the forum had opened a discussion about Elliot Rodger. On the first page a moderator writes that he condemns the deed and that Rodger did not reflect the philosophies of loveshy.com. The moderator announces that all posts glorifying the deed will be deleted.

One user writes on one of the later pages: "I think about Elliot Rodger ... why didn’t he just rape a slut at gunpoint? "

Another user wrote: "I was always taught to respect women and not to be sexually aggressive. That was a bucket full of shit. All what they really want is a muscle man who fucks them in the ass instead of fucking a real person with feelings”

A user writes on one of the last pages about Rodger: "He is a martyr, in the real sense of the word, one must give him that. "

On the forum Marijan calls himself "Dante Alighieri”, as the medieval poet. Dante started his poem “the Divine Comedy” with the words: "Halfway through the path of human life I found /myself in a devious dark forest/ Because I strayed from the right path."

On the morning after the first meeting Marijan wears the same clothes as on the day before. He says he did not sleep well, because the conversation had him stirred. In the café he ordered a chocolate cake and tells his life story.

Marijan grew up in a middle class family, he has a brother, and both parents were employeed. In school he had many years of little contact with girls. As he started to get interested in girls, they were alien to him. He was afraid of them. "My brain has not developed normally, " Marijan says. He was "love-shy". The American psychology professor Brian Gilmartin invented this term in 1987. The men who suffer from this condition complain about their complete inability to enter into a romantic relationship.

Some men report panic attacks, when they are alone with women, some break out in sweat, others can hardly move anymore when they think of a date, to which they look forward to. Marijan developed a morbid fear of women mingled with a steadily growing demand for a relationship with a woman.

He says: "My standards are very low, as long as the woman is not overweight or is unhygienic. And I have trouble with bad teeth. "

At 19, he met a girl through an SMS Chat. She was 16 and said to Marijan, that she wanted to sleep with him. She showed him how she likes to be kissed. The girl became Marijans girlfriend. He was happy for a moment.

Then she went on vacation over the summer to an island. Before parting, Marijan was angry because he did not want her to go, and told her that maybe they should become just friends.

The girl went anyway. Marijan sent her many SMSes and self-written poems. When she returned, she told him that she no longer liked him. Marijan could not cry for three days. Then when he finally cried, he didn’t go to the university for months and stuffed himself full with chocolate. He didn’t get over it, says Marijan. After one year he wrote on an Incel forum on the internet that he was planning on shooting himself and the girl. The owners of this forum contacted Interpol. Marijan got a visit of the Croatian police.

He testified that he no longer wanted to kill. The policemen nevertheless arrested him and charged him with the suspicion of murder threats and put him in pre-trial detention. After a month a judge released Marijan because he hadn’t threatened anyone directly. The judge said, so tells Marijan: "Maybe you’ll meet another woman just outside the court."

It was followed by two years without a kiss.

As Marijan turned 24 years old, he wrote on an Internet forum that he was a male virgin and looking for a woman, that would deflower him. A Croatian woman contacted him, visited him in Zagreb, slept with him and then said that he was pathetic , as he tells it.

In the years after he managed to bed three other women. "One of them was crazy and
a total bitch, "says Marijan. When she left him for another, he remained lying in bed for months, he says. He thought about suicide, and spent five days in a psychiatric ward.

Later he earned a degree in Medieval History at the Zagreb University. But he never wanted to work, because, as he says, he didn’t want to pay taxes that will reward sluts.

Today he says he no longer dates because he never want to feel disappointment again. He’s been alone for a year.

Most gunmen send out signals before their deeds, signals which could have been interpreted as warnings in retrospect. Allusions, threats, videos on the Internet.

Some gunman stuck a note on the school toilet wall, on which was written: "Tomorrow you're dead." Some men start wearing black clothes and leather jackets before they act. Elliot Rodger wrote his fantasies on blogs.

Marijan says: "There are a lot of broken people waiting to die. And he says:" I do not know when I will snap. " This English word "Snap" has several meanings. It can mean break, tear or explode. Marijan says: "I think Incel that can cause people to shoot or kill with a bomb. "

He smiles, it seems as if he enjoy the moment. Psychologists and psychiatrists that deal with school shootings, try to explain why men kill women, but women almost never kill men. Testosterone was one reason, the researchers say, and gender roles are also to blame, since men are more likely to resolve conflict with force and women are more likely to retreat. At the end they still lack a satisfactory explanation.

The FBI, the American Federal - police, writes in a report about shootings at schools that offenders are often focused on perceived injustices. One goes through life and picks out everything, that offends them. Every stupid comments of a classmate is remembered, each breakup with a girl finds his place in the collection of misery, until someone thinks the whole society is against you.

Many gunman also like to play videogames, where it’s the goal to shoot people’s head off. And many suffer from a narcissistic disorder.

But correlation does not equate causation, so no handy formula like this one can be derived: loneliness + computer games + narcissism = rampage. There are many lonely, narcissistic gamers who never shoot people.

In the life of a crazed gunman something happens, that the psychiatrists and psychologists cannot explain. Evil is sometimes greater than a simple explanation.

The assassin who tried in 1981 to shoot U.S. President Ronald Reagan, said when interviewed: "You know a few things about me, sweetheart, for example, that I’m obsessed with fantasy, but why don’t you understand, that fantasy in my world becomes reality? "

Another gunman from the USA heard voices that told him: "You have to kill all. You have to kill the whole world. "

According to Wikipedia: "The trigger of a rampage is a combination of an advanced psychosocial uprooting of the offender, the loss of professional integration through unemployment, demotion or transfer, increasingly experienced insults and partnership conflicts. "

After all, what Marijan tells about himself, he has few friends, no job, no partner, and he experiences his life as an insult, which becomes greater each passing dayl. Those looking for long enough, will realize that the template fits him.

The last meeting with Marijan is in the evening and takes place in a restaurant, again at a table away from the other guests. It is a warm evening, but Marijan sits down inside the restaurant, the place where no one else sits. He says that he wished that women have the right to vote taken away.

Then he says that he once tried to kill himself with sleeping pills, but one and a half days later he had woken up. His eyes light up with pleasure when he takes on the theme rampage. Then he unleashes the bad thoughts from his mind in the world. He says: "I will cause dissatisfaction. I want to make people angry. I do not think that I'm going to kill people. " After a moment of silence, he says: "I want to spread a little panic. "

He again starts talking about similar topics as on the first day, always it comes to women, and always it comes to himself, he says: "I've started to see women as the filth that they are. " A little later he says: "I do not like people."

This article attempts to explain about the Incel community and the research leads to different men, who identify as Incel. One dreams of to find a farm where Incels can live together. The farm dwellers could agree to import women from Mexico and divided them amongst themselves. One sat with radiant eyes in a small German town and told of how he overcame his fear of women by simply spending more time with women. He looked happy and said it was probably a good idea if the Incel forums were monitored by psychiatrists to ensure that the users can find professional help.

Another hopes to, finally, in his mid-twenties, to kiss a woman. A few of these men seem lost. Nobody seems dangerous. And in end it became clear that there is no Incel community. There are only a few lonely men.

Many men from the Incel community can simply find no partner and look for help on the internet. For them the forums can perhaps save them. For other men the forums offer the opportunity to cultivate their hatred in a group.

For 20 years, such people would remain in their hole, alone with their bad thoughts. Probably a man is difficult to love when he is full of hatred. While carrying these thoughts, it’s possible to want to kill everyone around you and yourself. The potential gunman becomes Incel. And not the Incel a potential gunman.

Elliot Rodger was in his mid twenties when he died, he had visited several therapists, he had been bullied at school, he had his own blog on the Internet.

Marijan is mid-twenties, he has visited several therapists, he was bullied at school, he wrote his own blog on the Internet. One was a mass murderer. The other meets with a journalist and eats chocolate cake.

Rodger left us with the question:

Why did six people have to die? There is no logical explanation. His 137-page manifesto that he wrote before he became a murderer, ends raving about the prospect of killing people. It shall be the punishment for not getting a woman who loves him. Rodger has named the work "My fucked-up world ". He writes that he will retaliate and punish everyone. The last sentence of the manuscript is as follows:

"Finally, I can show true value to the world. "And in the penultimate sentence Elliot Rodger, 22, a young man from California, who had his whole life before him writes: "And it will be beautiful."

Marijan wrote recently a new entry on his blog. He analyzed why he is lonely: "I finally understand the depths of madness and sexism in our society. All the betrayal, the whole heartless and horrible behavior of women were seen as my fault. That is hatred. "

Sherrie #conspiracy sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com

[Videos and pictures left out]

My Adventure In Georgia - To see What is Real and What is Not - I went to a "FEMA" camp - Coffins AND Georgia Guidestones in One Day!
Update - 3/19/13 I am bringing this up to the top, due to the 33 year anniversary of the Guidestones being erected on March 22.

We know how important 33 is to the Freemasons/Masonic people and since this is their little Masonic Monument of wanting 6+ Billion dead, I feel it should be at the top.

This is already a crazy week, from Cyprus to Fukushima not having electricity to the cooling of the reactors, besides last week, Italy getting a '13' Pope.

...

We have all heard about the FEMA camps, the Georgia Coffins AND the Georgia Guidestones (well lots of us, have heard about them before). We have seen pictures on the internet and have read all kinds of things about them.

I wanted to check these out for myself. I was visiting someone in Georgia, so I thought it would be a Great time to look into all of the internet claims and conspiracy theories. The person I was visiting was Totally up for it too. We felt like kids, our first ever spy type adventure. We met a friend for lunch and she wanted to join in on the adventure also. The three of us women, set out in 2 cars to tour Georgia and the conspiracies surrounding the FEMA camps, coffins and Guidestones.

We started out wanting to check out the FEMA camp claims at Fort Gillem in Forest Park, Georgia (an out skirt of Atlanta). Fort Gillem is listed as being a FEMA camp on various sites.

Before we went, we completely checked out the area with Google Earth - to see what rail lines were by it and if there were any suspicious looking things around it. We spotted what looked like could be "trailers/trains" on Google adjoining the base, so we wrote down that information and planned our adventure by going around the perimeter of the base. Including into a housing development, where the back yards ended at the fencing for the base.

...

We went to the "trailer" area first. It ended up being a bust for us, nothing there, but regular company containers for shipping. We did see a deer grazing within the base. We then went to the other side of the base, into the housing development. The houses were older ones and there seemed to be quite a few abandoned ones at that. Knowing from the Google map, we were directly at the spot on the other side of the fence, which the FEMA camp area is claimed to be.

I spotted an abandoned house - got out of the car and went around the back of the house to see if I could see anything inside Fort Gillem. I did not see anything but woods on the other side, BUT a few houses down (occupied houses) there seemed to be a building inside the fence with a chimney, it looked new. My friend took a picture for me (too bad - I didn't check before leaving the area) - the picture is not a close up and you really can't tell there is a beige building with a chimney from it.

Pictures from the backyard of abandoned house - the barbed wire angles on both sides, but it looks like it was originally built that way. Both sides are rusted the same.

...

Beige Building through trees, on Fort Gillem Property.

...

My findings are completely inconclusive on Fort Gillem being a FEMA camp. I saw no real evidence of that, by going around the perimeter of it.

Our next stop on our adventure were the infamous Georgia Coffins, located in Madison Georgia. It is about 50 miles from Atlanta on I-20. They are located, right off the highway. I have seen many pictures of them before - but I found there to be MANY more than what I have seen on the internet previously.

One guy did pass us on his bike, he seemed to work at the business next door to them. He casually passed by saying "those are grave liners". That didn't go over well with a friend there, who had no clue of them before having lunch with us! She kept saying "did you hear what he said?". I would just say "Yep", very casually - as I already knew what they were.

A few men walked down the road towards us - about 5 different ones at various times while we were there. They would pass by us, but stare while they were doing so. Once or twice we stood in front of our license plates so they could not be seen too easily. But of course - when I drove the car all the way to the end of them, I had to turn around for my license plate to be seen by all who may have been looking out from the buildings.

I have great pictures and a short youtube video of the coffins.

...

Our Next Stop was about 80 miles away from the coffins, we were traveling through small country roads to get to the Infamous Georgia Guidestones! I was really excited about seeing them. Since the Georgia Guidestones is what so many conspiracies are based on, because of them saying only 500,000 million people were to live on the Earth and controlled births.

The Guidestones are the foundation of what people believe is happening with the Swine Flu and Vaccines coming soon. The fact the Guidestones ultimately say - that 5 1/2 billion people need to die, for the Earth to be set correctly in balance with nature. The Balancing with Nature is repeated twice at the end.

After an almost 2 hour drive from the coffins to the Guidestones - as I rounded the last curve anxious to see them, my breath was taken away and I literally Gasped! They were completely impressive out in the middle of no where to be standing there in a small grass cut field. The fields all around the Guidestones are overgrown fields with weeds. Yet the stones stand magnificiently in the middle of it all. I do not approve of what they say, but they ARE very impressive and beautiful architectually. The sun was beginning to go down in the West, so I was able to take some photos with great shadows of the Guidestones stretching out tall across the grass.

The Words on the Georgia Guidestone repeated over in different languages on each side of the large pillars are as follows:

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
Unite humanity with a living new language.
Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Balance personal rights with social duties.
Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.

...

I have no idea what the hole through the middle stone is about - it does go up at an angle through the stone and faces North. Also the center square hole goes from East to West through the center stone. People have defaced the stones. In one way, it is sad they are defaced, but in another way - it is good, because of what they say. Now that I have seen them in person, they are a sight to behold out in the middle of nowhere and very regal looking.

I would like to know, who pays to have the grass cut. It was very manicured and well kept around the Guidestones. What is interesting is, it looked like the huge stone slab explaining the guidestones and in the ground, has been dug out from around it. Is that from the people that keep the place manicured or is it from vandals trying to dig out the stone? Will we ever find out who R.C. Christian is, who originally had them built for a group of "concerned citizens"?

Link to Google Map satellite: http://www.satellite-sightseer.com/id/10996/United_States/Georgia/Elberton/Georgia_Guidestones

Address and getting there: Address:
1065 Guidestones Rd., Nuberg, GA
Directions:
From Elberton travel north on Highway 77 for 8.7 miles (toward Hartwell). The Guidestones are visible on the right, a short distance from the road.

So, in conclusion, the FEMA camp investigation was a bust, I found no proof of one at Fort Gillem (though I could not get inside the base to check it out completely). I found the coffins and there are more there now, then I have seen before in pictures. The Guidestones are impressive - especially the way they rise out in the middle of nowhere. I do not like or agree with what they say at all!

I will hunt more FEMA camp locations, to discover if any are manned or real. Until I see one for myself, I will question if there are really lots of locations around the country set up to hold people in mass. I know the National Guard are now looking for "Relocation Specialist", and have seen what looks like one in a youtube video. I still want to see one for myself.

If I find one, I will put it up here and all the information about it.

Laura Lowder #fundie mercatornet.com

I was deeply moved by Julie Hinds’ story, recently told on MercatorNet: “Alternative Truths: A wife’s view of a gay coming out”. I am another ex-wife of a homosexual. Our stories have been too slow to come to light.

In the 30 years since Bill left me and embarked on the gay lifestyle, I’ve struggled to recover from the deep wounds left in the wake of his deception.

...

A man concerned only with having a wife as a public face is not inclined to treat her as his spiritual and intellectual companion, any more than as a lover. This was my experience.

Billy and I grew up together, started dating after high school and married while still in our teens. We’d been married two years when, during an argument about his non-communication and lack of attention, he broke down and told me he’d been seduced, at age 14, by an older man. “I’ve always been afraid that, if you hadn’t fallen in love with me and married me, that’s where I would have ended up,” he told me. There was not a word about his loving me.

I was young and naïve, I wasn’t close to my parents, and in my community in the 1960s and 70s, nice people just didn’t talk about some things. I was afraid my pastor would contact Bill’s boss if I went to him, so I didn’t get any sort of counseling until Bill eventually left me. In fact, after being physically sick for several days after that revelation, because it was just too much to deal with, I tried, rather too successfully, to put it out of my mind. We had three children (because I refused to take No for an answer, if you want to know), and we were active in our church all that time.

When, after 11-and-a-half years of marriage, Bill announced his intention of leaving me, my immediate reaction was relief. I’d grown to hate him, over the years, for not taking me seriously as a woman, as a human being. Bill has never been able to see that I possessed any real value or interest in my own right. Most of our arguments were over that. I didn’t or couldn’t remember his earlier admission about the seduction, and he always tried to deflect the blame for his lack of attention back on me: I wasn’t a good housekeeper, so he was too uptight to be affectionate or companionable, or some such thing. But I couldn’t leave. Our religious beliefs, as I understood them, prohibited divorce. I was also afraid of being alone. But now he was leaving. I was going to be free, at last.

I didn’t realize until five months after he moved out, and I ran into him and his partner at the grocery store, what had been going on. The electricity between the two men was palpable. I realized, They’re in love with each other! and remembered the disclosure he’d made years before. Oh, thank God! I thought. If I’d been perfect it still wouldn’t have been enough!

But there was also shock and fear. The realization of just what it meant, that Bill was gay, was a terrible blow. I had been, in gay slang, a “beard,” a false front to give him an acceptable public identity. Everything I had thought was true about myself and my world was suddenly proven false. I didn’t know what was real in my world, any more, or who I was in it. I teetered on the brink of a nervous breakdown for several years after that night, and only slowly recovered some sense of normality.

My work during the first few years of being single had me connecting with a variety of mental health professionals in our city. I wanted to understand what had happened to me – and to Bill; I asked them, Is there any literature about the impact of a husband’s homosexuality on his straight wife? No, they said. Thirty years later there still isn’t. This is why our stories are so important – they comfort us in our basic shared experiences, they assure us we are normal.

Maybe, some day, the psychological community will decide we deserve attention, and studies and papers, too. I’m not holding my breath: an industry that has defined its terms based on politics (as happened following the 1973 American Psychological Association convention, which decided to remove homosexuality from the manual of mental disorders) is not likely to give credence to a point of view opposing that position.

Our struggle is made harder than it ought to be by several factors. The lack of available information about what has happened to us is one. Another is the current political climate that lionizes homosexuality and dismisses us. Our gay husbands are so courageous, so heroic for coming out and claiming their truth . . . They are the important ones, they deserve so much respect and esteem just for being gay.

“Don’t you want Bill to be happy? Doesn’t he have that right?” a gay co-worker asked me at one point. His own partner was formerly married with two children.

“What about my right to be happy?” I countered. “He made me promises. Don’t I have a right to see those promises honored?”

“I’ve never thought about that,” he admitted.

Additionally, when we do share our stories on public media, we get attacked. Comment boxes are full of contemptuous responses: “Sour grapes,” are blamed for our dissent from the celebration of gayness. Misogyny is rampant: we can’t be rational creatures with legitimate, carefully-considered opinions; we can only be harridans seeking revenge.

At the same time, and often by the same people, our tragedy is used to promote gay marriage: “This is why we need gay marriage. If these men could have married, then none of these sob stories would have happened.” This is a false conclusion and an obfuscation of the truth.

The desire for a traditional family is a natural one. Marriage is a uniting of complementary opposites, beginning with the fundamental opposites of male and female. Gay “marriage” does not resolve the deeper wounds of same-sex-attraction and its impact on wives and children, but it does insult our unique identity – our inherent value as woman and as wife. It is also an affront to Christian morals and to natural law. For these reasons I do not recommend some of the online resources like the Straight Spouse Network – their support of gay marriage is counterintuitive to self-respect and healing.

Even worse, for many of us, is that the churches where we ought to find refuge and help are places that foster confusion and a false sense of guilt. My own church and pastor at the time of my initial discovery would have been most supportive and helpful had I had the clarity of mind to seek help. I’ve since converted to Catholicism, which recognizes that homosexuality is a grave impediment to a sacramentally valid marriage. But many in the evangelical and fundamentalist communities encounter a legalism founded on poor theology that employs guilt and coercion to wrongly assign responsibility rather than to support hurting spouses.

Some women decide to stay with their gay husbands, and, in my opinion, there are some very good reasons to stay, if that is agreeable to the spouses. I’m not sure it’s healthy, but there are extenuating circumstances which deserve respect. One woman I know has a disabling condition; her husband has chosen to remain married to her so his insurance is still available to help her in her illness, and their relationship is such that she has found that agreeable.

...

But we can’t win for losing. Even staying in the marriage, women face criticism. An article in the Huffington Post expresses great empathy for the gay husband’s sufferings in coming to terms with his attractions. But not a word does the article offer regarding the sufferings and the deep loneliness experienced by the woman married to him; in fact, the article tacitly blames wives for adding to the difficulties their husbands face, or for choosing to remain married to them even knowing the truth.

....

First of all, it’s not inevitable that the marriage will fall apart. Men who are willing to brave the hard work of reparative therapy – not “praying the gay away,” but a wholistic combination of recognized and respected therapeutic techniques – can find wholeness and a deep happiness in marriage. Of course, men who want to call it “trying” when they merely show up to cohabit at the same address are only fooling themselves. From my experience, Mr. Rymel gives the gay husband far too much credit, and his premise is insulting to us wives.

Moreover, husbands can manipulate us, too. Lying about his homosexuality, or about the nature of his relationships is common. And even when a man is straightforward with his wife, promises to work a program, promises to “be good” can fall apart when a man decides there’s no point any more and vacates the marriage. In such a case, a woman might well be justified to “call foul and take the martyr’s role.”

....

Besides, whether she stays or goes, or is left, a wife suffers. When the most intimate of her relationships is warped, when she is found fundamentally undesirable – again, in every dimension of relationship – she is wounded, and those wounds go deep and are hard to recover from. The memory of Bill’s recoil from ordinary gestures of affection lingers with me to the point I have feared resting my hand on my friend’s shoulder or forearm. I’m still deeply humiliated by the memory of his telling someone what a let-down he found our wedding night and the consummation of our marriage: “. . . disappointed . . . don’t know what all the fuss is about.”

But there is healing, and there is peace. It’s not an easy path, and there are too few resources for us. I found Wives’ Healing Journey enormously beneficial, but this is the only program I know of. While our gay husbands have public support, networking, and other venues available to help them transition into the gay community, there is almost nothing for the wives they left in pursuit of self-fulfillment. That must change. And I expect it’s going to have to change with us.

Being the ex-wife of a homosexual does not have to dominate our lives. It does not define who we are. But we must support one another, and our voices deserve to be respected.

Laura Lowder is a freelance writer who lives in the US. Her website is www.survivingtherainbow.com. Presently she is working with another ex-wife to develop a network for the support of other women and families affected by a loved one's homosexuality, transgenderism, and other related issues.

Matt Forney #sexist mattforney.com

I am smarter than nearly all the girls I’ve ever known.

That’s not arrogance talking: it’s the truth. Out of all the girls I’ve known, maybe three were at least as smart as me, and of that three, one is more intelligent than me. All the rest were my intellectual inferiors. I don’t hold it against them; in fact, when I run across girls who tout their “intelligence,” I feel nauseous, like I’m dealing with a pack of overeager Mormon missionaries.

One of the most dangerous delusions of modern America is the idea that girls are desirable because of how smart they are. Indeed, the idea that intelligent girls even exist in significant numbers is ridiculous. Puffed up by you-go-grrl propaganda from the media, their heads filled with lies from the universities, every girl who can spell her own name suddenly thinks she’s Einstein. Worst of all, girls think that being able to spell their own names entitles them to a good man, even when they’re bossy, defiant and lacking in feminine graces.

This is laughable.

The reality is that truly intelligent females are rare, and most girls who consider themselves “smart” are not. More importantly, the idea that men should find female intelligence attractive is as preposterous as expecting them to find hermaphroditism sexy. A girl’s most important aspects will always be her beauty, her charm and her willingness to please, with intelligence so far down the list that it might as well not be on the list.

Yet thanks to white knights artificially pumping up the egos of every girl in America, men are made to feel like freaks for considering a girl’s bust size to be more important than her ability to regurgitate Marxist tripe.

Here are my reasons why female intelligence is a fraud.
1. Few girls are actually intelligent.

This is the most important thing to know: intelligence is largely a masculine attribute. IQ testing has consistently shown that while men and females have the same mean intelligence, men have a wider standard deviation while females cluster around the middle. In layman’s terms, this means that there are more intelligent men than there are intelligent girls. At the same time, it also means that there are more unintelligent men then unintelligent girls, which is why the short bus tends to be a sausage fest. The “dumb bimbo” stereotype is a fiction invented by ugly girls.

Turns out that “boys go to Jupiter to get more stupider, girls go to college to get more knowledge” was at least half true.

This is why it’s a waste of time for smart men to cast about for a girl who is their intellectual equal: she simply doesn’t exist. You have a better chance of talking Zooey Deschanel and Ellen Page into a threesome than finding a girl who can match you in knowledge, life experience and all-around brains. You do find the occasional woman who can hold her own with men, but these exceptions don’t disprove the rule, any more than the existence of Kim Peek disproves the fact that most autistics are hand-flapping retards.

What’s really awful about this situation is that the mainstream media, invested in hiding the truth, blame men for not being able to find the right girl. “You’re looking in the wrong places.” “Intelligent, classy girls don’t hang out at bars.” “Maybe you just attract the wrong kinds of people.” They can’t simply admit that females are the passive sex, built for raising babies and not much else, because doing so might hurt girls’ self-esteem… and we can’t very well have that, now can we?
2. Girls are intellectually inferior.

Several months ago, I was on Twitter killing time when some teenage girl started sending rude and insulting Tweets at me because she was offfeeennnded at my article on why most girls shouldn’t bother going to college. I initially ignored her, but when she continued to harass me, touting her “4.0 GPA” and how smart she was, I clicked through to her profile and did a little research. Turns out that this oh-so-intelligent young lady was spending $58,000 a year to major in acting. Furthermore, while she was not unattractive—she had a good bone structure, a cute face and huge… tracts of land—she was at least twenty pounds overweight, so several of my followers started calling her fat. What was her response?

She started sending pictures of herself to me in an attempt to prove she wasn’t fat.

This girl wasn’t stupid; she was clearly four or five points above the mean female IQ. But not only did she massively overrate her intelligence, she was unwilling to accept that maybe, just maybe, she had made some poor choices in life.

That is the modern “intelligent” girl; an intellectual vacuum. Her life one great big fraud from beginning to end. Despite her vaunted “smarts” and her belief that she can “do anything,” she doesn’t major in math, engineering, computer programming or any discipline that requires actual work. No, she picks a soft major like English, education or ethnic studies, where there are no standards and you can pass any nonsense in for a grade so long as you sound authoritative. She rationalizes her choices by saying that she wants to “help the children” or she’s “interested in learning,” despite the fact that all American education does is teach people to memorize Marxist nonsense and repeat it back word for word.

Claiming that girls are intelligent because they earn the majority of degrees is like saying that parrots are intelligent because the majority of them can mimic human speech.

When she graduates, assuming she isn’t spat right back into the service industry, she’ll go to work as a government bureaucrat, HR commissar, paralegal or other profession that contributes nothing to society. She’ll complain about the pay gap even as she takes every day off she can because her “head hurts” or she “needs some time off with the girls.” She’ll whine about the lack of girls in management roles even as she plans to quit her job when she has kids… but not until she’s in her thirties, of course.

After all, she wants to “have fun” first and “get it out of [her] system” before she settles down.

But it’s in her choice of hobbies that the modern “smart” girl truly exposes her vacuity. She doesn’t spend her free time reading science textbooks or perfecting her chess game: she TiVoes Teen Mom and obsesses over Lena Dunham’s cleavage. If she reads books at all, she limits herself to trashy mainstream thrillers like The Hunger Games or textual pornography like Twilight. Her weekends are spent pumping chumps for peach daiquiris at the dive bar and getting pumped by every stud who stirs her loins. Even so-called “nerd girls” are phonies, as their “nerdiness” extends to playing video games once in a blue moon or re-Tweeting charlatans like Neil deGrasse Tyson.

The only thing separating her from a ghetto baby momma is the ability to form complete sentences.

Face it: the vast majority of girls are as hollow as a drum. The three or four surplus IQ points that college-educated girls have are wasted on them, because all they’re used for is rationalizing a life of mindless consumption and sluttiness. If the modern West is a cesspool, girls are its most devoted coprophages, gulping down runny diarrhea by the bucketload with forced smiles on their faces.
3. Girls know that their “intelligence” is a lie.

As loudly as they brag about their “strength” and “independence,” girls know inside that their credentials are worthless in the eyes of men. Go back to that chubby acting major who started insulting me on Twitter. Me pointing out that her degree was worthless didn’t faze her, nor did my reminding her that she was wasting sixty grand a year for it. It was calling her fat—insulting her looks—that wounded her most deeply.

And she was so insecure that she resorted to begging for validation from me, a man she considered a “misogynist.”

The vagina is the perfect representation of the nature of females. An empty vessel, a hole, a void with no identity of its own. Without a man to fill her with his essence, she is as useless as a crabapple rotting on the sidewalk. Only by taking that essence deep inside her can she mature and become the woman she was meant to be. And filled with the wrong essence, she becomes an intellectual Typhoid Mary, mindlessly infecting others with her diseases of the mind.

That’s the problem with girls today: they’re so full of bullshit that their eyeballs are brown.

That bullshit is pumped into their skulls by men. Every advance in “women’s rights” occurs only because men allow it to occur. Women’s suffrage was only passed into law in the U.S. because leftist Protestants in the Republican Party wanted to ensure an electoral majority for Prohibition and other “social purity” policies. Sexual liberation only happened in the sixties because cowardly draft-dodging hippies, knowing they could not compete with real men for the affections of feminine women, encouraged girls to slut it up so they could get laid. The mass entry of girls into college and the workforce was instigated by corporate capitalists in order to drive down wages and smash workers’ rights.

If at any point, men had collectively told girls no, they would have quieted down and gone back to the kitchen like they were told.

So it is with the myth of female intelligence. Girls believe they are smart, worldly and cultured because men lie and white knight for them. The gelded father telling his little princess that she can be whatever she wants to be, the slack-wristed orbiter who writes sweet nothings on her Facebook posts, the hipster nancyboy who claims he wants an “equal”: they are the enemy. Without them, the Katerinas of America would gladly kneel to their Petruchios. Because these genetic discards cannot compete with legitimate men, they encourage degeneracy in the vain hope of getting their dicks wet.

Spraying the hollyhocks with lye is the only way they can propagate their diseased seed.

As men, it is our responsibility to bring girls back to their proper place. To lead them into their natural roles as wives and mothers. We men do not choose or reward girls for their clown college degrees, their meaningless cubicle jobs, or their supposed “intelligence.” We reward them for their willingness to please us and make us happy, and in doing so make themselves happy. No amount of phony education or career “success” will scratch that deep itch in a girl’s soul: the desire to serve a man.

Not a “guy,” not a “male”: a man.

Inside every Strong, Independent Woman™ is a suppliant girl yearning to break free. I say we give that girl a hand.

Jim #sexist blog.jim.com

The basics of Reaction need to be stated, and they need to be stated in a way that excludes our enemies, because we are seeing a whole lot of people saying “Hail fellow reactionary”, who are clearly hostile to us, and not hostile the media/academic/judicial elite that we seek to overthrow, blaming various groups that tend to be allied or sympathetic to reaction for the problems caused by our holier than thou elite, urging reactionaries that the real enemy is group X, where X is anyone who is plausibly an ally or likely to become one.

So, starting with the concepts most likely to offend: The reactionary red pill on women. Which are also concepts that have practical application even while our enemies rule. Next articles in the Reaction 101 series will be more directly political and have less individual application in daily life.

Emancipation was a bad idea. Feral women behave badly and are psychologically disturbed. They need to be redeemed by becoming the property of some man. Women are psychologically maladapted to independence and equality

In any marriage or long term relationship, the woman will endlessly launch physical, emotional, and legal power struggles against her husband or boyfriend, shit tests, which power struggles she wants to lose.

If she wins, she will break up, looking for someone who can conquer her. You just have to win. If the only way to win without going to jail is to send her away, send her away and go dark. But she would rather you beat her. You have to wear the pants. This is the PUA analysis of negs and shit tests, applied to long term relationships.

Women are maladapted to equality. That women find male apes sexually attractive and men do not find female apes sexually attractive indicates that among those humans that whites and east asians are descended from, females have not been allowed to make sexual choices since the days we looked rather like apes. Since female sexual choice is quite common, we should conclude that groups that allowed women sexual choice failed to reproduce or suffered dysgenesis, and perished.

In order to reproduce, and particularly in order to reproduce the white and east Asian ancestral environment, in a cold climate with severe winters that require food and shelter over winter, husbands and wives need cooperate/cooperate equilibrium, and if you have free women, you get defect/defect equilibrium. To impose cooperate/cooperate requires external coercion, in particular that women have to be stuck with the first guy that they have sex with, and are not permitted to be permanently on the prowl to trade up throughout their fertile years.

When allowed to be permanently on the prowl, they tend to practice serial monogamy until around thirty or so when their eggs start running out.

All businesses with women in power are destroyed, unless they are the beneficiaries of some state favor that artificially keeps them in business. Female executives are only useful if under the authority of a sexy alpha male, otherwise they turn on the shareholders, the employees, and the customers, perceiving them as betas.

Subjective personal observation: All sexual harassment complaints result from horny women shit testing terrified men, and then getting frustrated because the terrified men fail their shit tests. This personal observation is statistically confirmed by the fact that a far larger proportion of women complain about sexual harassment in workplaces where the women substantially outnumber the men. There has never been one complaint of sexual harassment against me, and if sexual harassment complaints resulted from social justice warriors tell us constitutes sexual harassment, there would have been a pile of them.

Subjective personal observation: All rape complaints are false and all rape convictions are false, not because real rapes do not happen, but because women do not really mind real rapes and fail to complain. This personal observation is confirmed by the University of Virginia complaints process: The university of Virginia dealt with a big pile of rape and sex complaints, and dismissed every single one without disciplinary action. So Rolling Stone investigated them looking for poster girls and trouble, came up empty.

Men and women very much want to form families and want those families to last into their old age. My wife was eighteen in my eyes all her years, except near to the very end, and even though I sometimes have some pleasant youthful female companionship, I still sometimes find myself shaking and weeping when I remember my wife.

If you look at any successful family, no one is equal. Dad is in charge, mum picks up the socks. In principle, it is possible to form families in a society where men and women are equal, by freely contracting out of equality, but in practice, it is hard, and I see how hard it is for my sons. We have prisoners dilemma with few iterations, so the natural equilibrium between men and women is defect/defect. To prevent defect/defect, to ensure cooperate/cooperate, requires heavy handed coercive intervention by state, family, and society, and this heavy handed coercion necessarily bears far more heavily on women than on men. If you want a society where men and women know sexual love, or if you want a society which has above replacement total fertility rate, women just cannot be allowed to follow their pussies. And this requires a lot of supervision and coercion, primarily keeping women under control, rather than keeping men under control. For most women this requires that they be subject to the potential threat of physical discipline by the men in their lives. For a great many women, this requires that they be subject to the actuality of physical discipline by the men in their lives. So women should never have been emancipated, and some “violence against women” is legitimate, proper, and proportionate. Women, like children and dogs, need discipline and supervision and are never happy if they do not get them. A spoiled child, or a spoiled woman, or a spoiled dog, is never happy. The dog and the woman bark all the time.

Further, sexual impulses set in in girls at a disturbingly early age, usually well before puberty thought there is a great deal of variance, while male sexual impulses set in at puberty, as reliable as clockwork.

Ever greater vigilance against pedophiles” is like telling a chicken farmer he should not fence or cage his chickens, but instead should make the world safe for his chickens to wander wherever they please. When nine year old girls go to an Ariana Grande concert without being accompanied and supervised by male kin, they are going there to get nailed. Restraints on female sexuality have to restrain females, have to be oppressive to women, because being oppressive to men is not likely to work, and is conspicuously and spectacularly failing to work.

The family law of the Old Testament got it right, and modernity is surrealistically deluded, and flat in my face insane. I see in front of my nose stuff that no one else sees, so either I am insane or the world is, and the statistics are strangely consistent with me being sane, and difficult to reconcile with the world being sane. If you are using words for human things and human conduct that the people of the Old Testament had no words for, chances are you are using words for things that have no real existence, anticoncepts, words that are lies, that you are speaking madness and delusion.

The family law and family institutions dictated in Deuteronomy and depicted in the Book of Proverbs lasted for thousands of years. Our current social order is extremely recent. Within living memory, within my memory, it has changed radically in ways that are horrifying, tragic, and terrifying, and everyone is acting like this is normal and nothing is wrong.

Modernity is for me like one of those horror movies where one character sees monsters and another character does not, and you wonder if the monsters are real or just delusion, until you see someone get eaten by a monster. And I see people getting eaten by monsters, in the sense of transparently false rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, sexual harassment et cetera charges, and I also see people who tell me men have nothing to fear, because women never lie, while women have much to fear because they so very very much dislike rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, and sexual harassment. But I also see these men acting terrified, while I am bolder than any of those men who supposedly believe that men have nothing to fear. In part of their minds they must see what I see, because I see their fear, and in part of their minds, the part that speaks and constructs a narrative, they do not see what I see, even though it is right in front of them.

Women get angry because they do not get the supervision, command, and guidance that they crave. Sometimes this anger turns inward, as with cutting and other self destructive acts, and sometimes it turns outward. She feels really badly treated, because she has in fact been really badly treated, but because the real causes of her discontent are unthinkable, she concludes she has been sexually harassed or sexually assaulted, when in fact her mistreatment was lack of sexual assault, lack of a strong hand to discipline her.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

I'm an insider and I know what will happen to the refugees

I'm not going to tell you who I'm. just believe it or not, but mark this thread for the near future.

This is the plan:

A new country will be created for them in the Middle east, next to Israel. The country will be named al-Dawla al-Islamiyya (ISIL).

Muslims will be rounded up and shipped back to this newly created Islamic State which includes Syria, parts of Iraq, Lebanon and Jordan. It will be right next to Israel, that's the plan. The mass deportation of Muslims will take place in America and Europe after many false flag deadly attacks including nuclear ones.

TPTB want the world to see Muslims the way they want it to be. The turn will be for the Jews. TPTB will do the same thing for Israel. Muslims are not doing these attacks, but they are the scapegoat, the bridge used by TPTB to cross to achieve their goals both in the short-term and the long-term. It's all theater. Israel is controlled by MI6, TPTB headquarters since 1947 and even all the brutality and chaos in Israel is planned to prepare the world to see the Jews the way TPTB want it to be.


What is the end goal?

Destroying both Islamic and Jewish radicalism from within.

How this will be done?

TPTB will let Israel destroy this newly created Islamic State and then let it establish Greater Israel. They will let it play the fascist role, then the world, led by Britain and France will destroy Greater Israel, rename it Palestine and announce the country and the whole Asian Mideast part under Anglo-French protectorate

It's a long-term plan I just gave it to you on a golden plate. Believe it or not!

This way TPTB would successfully destroy both Islam and the Jews worldwide, regain the whole Middle East without an American or Israeli proxy and showing the world that the world can't have an empire other than the British (you'll understand this part later).

That's the game set and planned since WWII. I have more to say but you wouldn't believe a word, so just take this for now!

Witchwind #fundie witchwind.wordpress.com

If we managed to overcome men’s tyranny over us, how would we rebuild our world? I just want to throw some ideas here that I often come across these days. I dream for concrete, down-to-earth, simple and easily applicable measures of stepping out of patriarchy into a female-loving, biophilic world. This isn’t by any means a realistic plan of how to achieve it, but just reading it makes me feel happy. It makes it feel more real, more possible. Enjoy!

[...]

FAMILY, CHILD-RAISING AND REPRODUCTION
Fathers’ rights will cease to exist. There is no such thing as fatherhood — as we all know, it’s a myth. Men will necessarily lose all and any power to dominate and control women’s reproductive capacities.

It’s the inalienable right of each woman to control every phase of her reproduction and life creation. Abortion will be possible at any stage of pregnancy, however there will hardly be such a thing as undesired pregnancy since there won’t be any men forcing pregnancies on us any more. Abortion will nonetheless be recognised for the trauma, mutilation and loss of life that it is. The number of children and human population will naturally decrease to sustainable levels, so will the number of males born. Women will be free to experiment parthenogenesis or procreation with two female eggs.

The nuclear family will be abolished, in particular the parent’s property rights and absolute power over her child. Children will be considered as persons in need for autonomy and all form of punishment, authority or educational manipulation over children will equally be abolished. Raising and caring for children will be a collective responsibility for women, and motherhood / childcare and especially capacity to be empathetic towards children will be taken very seriously, as something that needs to be (re)learned and studied over years before being fully competent for this immense task.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

2 brothers were responsible for the hellish US-UK Mutual Defense Agreement: Allen and John Foster Dulles. That agreement was signed under the ASSumption that Churchill had the hydrogen bomb and was now a member of the "Big 3 Hydrogen Bomb Club."

An agreement is not necessarily a treaty. Whereas treaties require advice and consent by two-thirds of the Senators present, sole executive agreements may be executed by the President acting alone.

The agreement led to the doomsday scenario called the Cuban Missile Crisis. Every conflict that the Pentagon fought since 1958 can be attributed to that hellish agreement. Nuclear testing in Nevada, and the poisoning of the country with radiation emitting nuclear power stations, can also be attributed to the agreement.

Spymaster Allen Dulles headed the CIA, which is the U.S. Branch of the British Secret Service.

John Foster Dulles was Secretary of State under President Eisenhower.

Both men were responsible for deceiving the President into believing that Churchill had the hydrogen bomb.

President Eisenhower was one of the most beloved Presidents in U.S. history. He ended the Korean War and resisted the tremendous pressure from the Pentagon to launch a first strike thermonuclear attack on the Soviet Union. Even though he was a general, he knew that the U.S. did not do Pearl Harbors like Hitler and Hirohito.

Almost everybody "liked Ike," particularly his handling of the 1956 Suez Canal Crisis.

By forcing the British lion to disgorge the Suez Canal, he let every nation know that the era of colonialism was over.

The fifties were the "Golden Years" for the United States of Israel.

The man that was groomed to succeed him, Richard Nixon, would also have made a great President.

Vice President Richard Nixon served an 8-year apprenticeship under President Eisenhower. He was the natural choice for President in 1960. Everything went downhill for the country with Kennedy "the Catholic" and "Camelot."

At the behest of his Secretary of State, the treaty from hell was signed by President Eisenhower on July 3, 1958.

Why would a country sign a mutual defense agreement with its deadly enemy???

The stationary earth is not big enough for a monarchy and a republic to coexist. The two systems are inimical. The Prophet Daniel predicted that iron and clay, symbolizing monarchies and republics, would be forced to share the stationary earth at the end of time.

A mutual defense agreement is supposed to be a 2-way street. During the entire 10 years of the Vietnam War, the Iron Kingdom didn't even send a medical unit to help the U.S. wounded!!

Since at least 1700, the Iron Kingdom has been ruled by the Papal Parliament. The British monarchy was stripped of all its finances by the Civil List Act of 1698. From that time onward, all the finances for the kingdom are in the hands of the Papal Parliament. Common people on that imprisoned island have no say in the horrible doings of their government.

The last HONEST MAN to rule the Iron Kingdom was King George III . . . and he was almost driven mad.

Contact your representative immediately to cancel this hellish agreement!!

An agreement is not like a formal treaty that requires approval by two-thirds of the Senate. Usually agreements are top secret and only need the signature of the President and Secretary of State. Consequently, cancellation would only require those two signatures.

The Papal British are all potential Guy Fawkes. They love to blow things up. The only thing the IRON KINGDOM ever wanted from the United States of Israel are nuclear weapons . . . to blow up Mother Russia!!

For the sake of Presidents Jackson, Lincoln, and Eisenhower, do your patriotic duty and contact your Senator or Congressman immediately.

If you don't, that hellish treaty will drag the United States into a thermonuclear war with Russia. Ask them also to close down all the deadly, irradiating nuclear power stations in the country.

Jake Jones #fundie examiner.com

[Regarding the tragic mass shooting at Ft. Hood]

Just prior to the attack, Hasan shouted "Allahu Akbar" (God is great) before opening fire on defenseless soldiers. And, we are told not to jump to conclusions or rush to judgment over the rampage committed at Ft. Hood. After all, the greater tragedy would be the crumbling of America's idol of tolerance. That said, the question needs to be asked "should Muslims be allowed in the military of the United States"? There seems to be the possibility of "conflict of interest" on the part of Muslim's.

This cowardly assault by a radical Muslim is only the effect, the cause is political correctness! America needs a reality check when it comes to political correctness. Whether it is in Congress, a state, our communities or eve in our own homes, Islam is not necessarily the peaceful religion that 'they' portray it.

There are those who say (including George W. Bush) that Islam and Christianity worship the same God. We do not, and by doing so and saying so, we have taken a step backward from the REAL GOD! Are we willing to sell our birthright as Americans so we can be just as sophisticated and enlightened as the Socialistic and soon to be 'Muslim' European nations. Are we willing to tell our children "this is what you get because we needed to be more politically correct when it came to other religions"?

Radical Islam has no scruples, no guilt, and no remorse for their actions. Mostly because they (Radical Islam) falsely justify and interpret the writings of the violence of Mohamed, who wrote a book called the Koran centuries after the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

It's time to get off the pot and stop taking a back seat in order to be politically correct. We need to call things what they are in America. If they are terror, lets call them terror. Let destroy the "idol of tolerance".

Janet bloomfield #sexist judgybitch.com

Brock Turner is a rapist but not the kind that frightens me.

A guy I train with told me a funny story about mixing martial arts with alcohol. Like me, he’s not really interested in martial arts as a sport, but more in terms of real world applicability. He’s a fighter more than an athlete. He was training with a group who felt the most likely environment in which they would encounter real violence would be a bar, and alcohol would likely be involved, so they convinced their sensei to run a simulation that involved everyone doing tequila shooters, to test their reflexes and muscle memories under the influence. Could they drink tequila and still be able to handle real world violence? They turned the lights down and the music way up, which is not that unusual for a dojo. Lots of stress drills are done in low light, noisy conditions.

And then guzzled tequila.

Everything started out fine. Everyone was jokey and boisterous and having fun with the drills and even singing along to the hokey death metal band. And then tequila 2.0 arrived. When the full effects kicked in, people started getting hurt. The fight took on a whole new dimension. Wrist locks got brutal. People didn’t notice their partners tapping out. Choke holds were a little too enthusiastic. No one waited for a secure hold before reaping. It was mayhem!

It’s funny to hear him tell the story, because from the outside it seems like a terrifying drunken brawl, and it was, but the fighters enjoyed every minute of it. It was fun. Sensei had to cut the class short because people were getting hurt. Being drunk, they didn’t really realize it, and were thoroughly enjoying themselves. The next day, people had bruises and sprains and fat lips and black eyes and swollen joints and stuff that should never happen except by pure accident when sparring. Someone even dropped a 12-6 elbow between his opponent’s shoulder blades, which is pretty much a nuclear elbow strike you don’t pull out lightly. It’s actually sort-of illegal in most martial arts, but perfectly acceptable in self-defense. The fighters agreed to never drunk spar again, although I suspect that was a very effective lesson in teaching them just how much alcohol impaired their ability to use proportional violence.

The real point is that while the sparring was happening, the fighters were having a blast. They were doing what they do: fighting. I’m sure getting out of bed the next day brought a few regrets home, but in the moment, it was fun. The whole story made me think of the Brock Turner case – the Stanford athlete convicted of sexually assaulting a drunk woman outside a fraternity.

Let’s get a few things out of the way right off the bat: do I think Brock Turner is a rapist?

Yes.

Yes, I do. Turner claims he went outside with the woman and they were making out and I believe him. They were both drunk, but she was sloppy drunk and she passed out cold. Turner dragged her behind a dumpster, removed her panties, somehow managed to get rocks and dirt in her vagina, shoved his fingers in her, left her with scrapes and bruises and only stopped assaulting her when a couple guys noticed what he was up to, and then chased Turner down when he ran. Bystanders held Turner until police arrived.

Please note that this is exact opposite of feminist rape culture, in which rape is treated like a joke and condoned by the wider society. No one (except Turner’s father) thinks Turner’s action were amusing or acceptable. The Stanford police were involved right off the bat, the woman was found and taken to hospital, charges were laid and Turner was prosecuted successfully and sentenced to jail, even though the victim can’t remember a single thing about the incident. That doesn’t sound like condoning, celebrating or accepting rape to me. Or to Ashe Schow, who has written a nice explanation of rape culture as it relates to Brock Turner.

But of course, feminists are mad. They’re always mad. They’re mad at Brock because being sentenced to life isn’t harsh enough. Yes, you read that correctly. Turner got a life sentence. No, not in jail. He was sentenced to 6 months in jail, and will likely spend 3 months there, but he will spend the rest of his life on the Sex Offender Registry. That is punishment untempered by mercy, yet not punishment enough to satisfy feminists, ecstatic that they finally found an actual rape victim to get behind.

According to Emily Horowitz, who wrote [i]Protecting Our Kids: How Sex Offender Laws Are Failing Us[/i], sex offender registries don’t keep anyone safer. Speaking to Slate’s Christina Cauterucchi, Horowitz says. ‘Are sex offenders destined to reoffend? Not according to any research—sex offenders have lower recidivism rates than almost any other type of offender. Punishing [Turner] forever and destroying his life doesn’t make anyone safer.’

I’m sure you’ll be shocked to know that feminists don’t care. Read the comments. They want Turner to suffer for the rest of his life. They want him to pay for his idiocy for the rest of his life. They want revenge, not justice. It’s so rare for an actual, unambiguous rape victim to emerge, feminists are practically in shock. Whipping women up in frenzied fear, feminists have convinced almost 100K people to sign a petition to remove the judge who decided to temper Turner’s life sentence with reduced jail time. Justice must not have mercy? I’d be really careful with that demand, feminists. It could bite you in the ass, pretty easily.

The reality here is that Brock Turner is like the fighters who beat the shit out of each other while loaded. Turner has no reputation for being criminally sexually aggressive, but he is a predator. Like all athletes, he channels his natural desire to compete and triumph into a sport, and he was very good at winning. Competitors and predators come down to the same thing. No one wants to tie. It’s a zero sum game. I win. You lose. Civilization is the story of channeling this aspect of human nature into creation, rather than destruction. Brock Turner got drunk and behaved in a criminally foolish manner. An equivalent would be a drunk sparring partner who knocked his partner out and then kept hitting him. It crosses every line and deserves sanction and punishment.

Rapists like Turner don’t frighten me. Avoiding him is as simple as not getting black out drunk and refusing to go make out with him outside, in the dark. The trouble with feminist definitions of rape is that they confuse drunk couples who go outside and have mutually consensual sex, having fun in the moment, with actual rape. That is exactly what happened at Occidental College. Both individuals were drunk, both agreed to have sex, but she regretted it the next morning. If they had both been drunk, and agreed to spar, could she charge him with assault and battery the next day? Occidental says yes.

I say no.

People do stupid shit when they’re drunk. Alcohol lowers inhibitions, which is a key reason people like to drink it. But it doesn’t fundamentally change who you are as a person. The fighters my friend and I talked about did stupid stuff when fighting drunk they would never do sober, but none of them crossed the line into brutally beating an unconscious partner. It was just a kind of crazy, wild playfight that left a few people bruised and bleeding, but no criminal lines were crossed.

Most drunk sex, no matter how much one party or the other might regret it in the morning, is not rape.

What Turner did is rape.

Feminist definitions of regret=rape are now starting to trap women, too. When Rose grabbed herself a drunk guy and fucked him, she thought it was just a good time, had by all. And it was. In the moment. But when morning came and the guy saw he had just boned a fat chick, he turned campus rape laws on her and had Rose expelled.

This is nuts.

And awesome, at the same time. Turnabout is fair play, ladies. If you are going to expand the definition of rape to include sex one person regrets, you’re going to have to accept the uncomfortable truth that men make poor decisions when plastered, too, and stick their dicks in women they wouldn’t glance at twice when sober. If we’re going to call drunk sparring ‘assault’ and criminally prosecute it, any woman who downs a shooter and steps in the ring can be charged.

Is this really the world we want? Young men and women expelled from college, their futures blighted, because they got drunk and did something dumb? No one should be expelled from college for hooking up while drunk. Drunk sex is not rape. Rape is rape. It’s not that hard to tell the difference. Turner is a case study in campus rape. And even he doesn’t deserve a life sentence. He is extremely unlikely to reoffend.

Justice without mercy is cruelty. Is anyone surprised feminists are howling for exactly that when it comes to Turner, and by extension, all men accused of rape? The real danger here is that cruelty can be contagious. I sincerely hope the courts do not bow to the pressure of feminists and remove this judge. That will spread the contagion of feminism and we are already at critical mass.

Never forget that feminism is cancer.

What we really need are a few more fat bitches to get charged with rape. A few brave men are needed, to take one for the team. We need to show everyone the insanity of feminist ideals of ‘justice’.

Any volunteers?

Lots of love,

JB

Pamela Rae Schuffert #fundie #conspiracy #crackpot americanholocaustcoming.blogspot.com

“AND I SAW THE SOULS OF THEM BEHEADED FOR THE WITNESS OF JESUS AND THE WORD OF GOD..."
-From Revelation 20:4
WHY ARE THERE CONTINUING REPORTS OF MODERN GUILLOTINES CONSTANTLY RESURFACING ACROSS AMERICA?
As one continues to read this particular verse, Revelation 20:4, it becomes clear that it is referring specifically to those Christians to be beheaded under the an antichrist satanic world globalist government of Revelation 13, who will refuse the cashless 666 society and refuse worship of the false "god" of the NWO which is in reality LUCIFER, as former satanists admitted to me.
I can never forget praying with another Christian prayer warrior one night when the divine Holy Spirit spoke to us clearly and said, "I am pouring out MY SPIRIT upon my people in America now, because without His power, you will not be able to make it with what is coming to your nation!"
This was in 1976. Stunned, I asked, "Father God. What is coming to our nation?" He replied, " My child, if I were to show you now what is coming to your nation,you would NOT BE ABLE TO BEAR IT." Shock and silence as I pondered those heavy words.
And the next day, my prayer partner exclaimed, "you won’t BELIEVE what God showed me after we asked Him to show us what is coming! He gave me a VISION of Christians arrested and lined up in front of modern guillotines, to be BEHEADED FOR THEIR FAITH!"
I am ashamed now to admit I laughed within when I first heard this. Because now, many years later, I know through several decades of in-depth research that THE MODERN MILITARY GUILLOTINES ARE A GRIM REALITY OF THINGS TO COME.
Both intelligence and military sources have admitted to me during numerous interviews that highly covert training programs for select Army platoons have been taking place in US Army bases such as Fort Lewis, Fort Benning, Fort Hood. Fort Bragg and others.
I personally interviewed Staff Sergeant Donnie Boysel of Fort Lewis, Washington, while he was in full uniform and traveling home on leave. Previously warned by another military source stationed at Fort Lewis, that there was a covert guillotine training program going on there, I confronted Boysel that day.
He almost fell on the floor with shock when I mentioned this!
"How do you know about the guillotines at Fort Lewis? This is highly classified information! In fact, when I return from leave, my job will be to train the men in my platoon (64) in how to operate them, using practice dummies.The building is partly underground and we can't even bring cell phones inside because they don't want photos taken of the guillotines..."
I asked him if he was a Christian and he replied yes.I then informed him that the guillotines would be heavily used under martial when they begin to arrest Christians under martial law as " NWO resisters."
I said, "Donnie, they will drag these Christians before the guillotines and demand they RENOUNCE THEIR FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST and join the NWO...or be BEHEADED FOR THEIR FAITH. Now can you train your men to behead people...?"
He was silent as he thought about the implications of what I shared. He looked at me and said,"My superiors never told me they would be used like this! No...I can never train my men to do this now! I will tell them...we are not going along with this martial law agenda....I am calling my men immediately..."
We parted soon after this discussion of several hours.You can read my full interview with him in my 2009 reports on my website, AmericanHolocaustComing.blogspot.com. And of course a highly censored/controlled mainstream news media will never tell the American people the disturbing truth about this dark secret and hidden agenda.
I have written much more besides on my website about these interviews.Truck drivers I have personally interviewed across America have admitted to me that they have hauled loads of these mysterious modern guillotines to military bases across the USA...BUT they were never told what their dark clandestine purposes were.
But various former insider sources admitted to me they were a part of the future NWO/martial law agenda for America. They would be used to behead future "resisters of the NWO," with Christians heavily targeted.
In Holy Scriptures, we read one one woman of faith in God, Esther, who was to discover that there was a terrible plan to annihilate her Jewish people by a wicked adversary Haman, even as her uncle Mordechai, warned her.
Grieved and concerned for her people, she sought for a way to save them...ultimately marrying the King and then risking her very life by pleading with the King to SPARE HER BELOVED PEOPLE from genocide that Haman's evil law would create against the Jews.
Esther's tactics were successful, the king was angered over what Haman had plotted, and this whole plan of genocide against her beloved Jews was averted. Her people were rescued from certain death by her efforts.
Through my 25 years of in-depth research, I too have been compelled into a similar position, loving and caring deeply about my fellow Christians after being repeatedly warned of the NWO agenda to persecute to the point of genocide of the Christian's under martial law, frankly admitted to me in person by more than one former NWO planner and insider.
Crushed by what they told me awaited my beloved fellow Christian's under martial law ("...brutal rape,torture and death..." according to one intelligence source), I fasted and prayed, asking God what I could do to help save them and to wake them up to this horrific and heinous threat to their very existence.
My 25 years of relentless journalism to uncover the truth about this dark agenda of a very real, Biblically-prophesied NEW WORLD ORDER and it's ominous implications for my fellow Christians, all came forth following my prayers for God to show me what to do to warn my people.
No one has paid me to perform this journalism, and in fact it has cost me everything...and will someday ultimately cost my life for daring to expose the truth.
But even as Queen Esther, or Hadassah, I have also said in my grieved heart, "if I perish I perish..." but I must do whatever I can to warm and wake up my beloved people across America!
Body of Christ, God has sent faithful witnesses and "watchmen on the wall" like myself and others besides, to warn you of dangers to come.
What are you doing to prepare your hearts for future persecution and coming temptation to "DENY JESUS...OR DIE?"
The very salvation of your eternal soul depends upon your obedience to Jesus, "Be thou FAITHFUL UNTO DEATH,and I will give you the crown of life..." Jesus has warned us that IF we DENY HIM BEFORE MEN, He too will DENY US.
This means NO SALVATION, and eternity in eternal torments and everlasting destruction...for without Jesus you have NO SALVATION.
Remember this when martial law is declared and the persecution of Christians begins in earnest across America...and the guillotines of Revelation 20:4 are brought forth to fulfill End Time Bible prophecy at last...and the NWO advocates drag you before these guillotines and demand that you deny your precious Savior,or die...or you are thrown into prisoner boxcars with shackles to be hauled off to grim FEMA camps for elimination. Many of these prisoner boxcars also have the modern guillotines installed in them as well, according to eye witnesses I have interviewed.
Please, join with the saints and martyrs of Christ through the ages who have gone before you, and choose to confess Jesus faithfully unto the end.
They are among the great cloud of witnesses, watching from Heaven's ramparts with God Himself to see who will gain the glorious crown of LIFE and remain FAITHFUL UNTO DEATH!
Your sufferings in this world are but FOR A MOMENT..but eternity in Heaven is forever..and so is HELL.
Choose wisely your path, Beloved fellow saints and martyrs of Jesus, the Messiah! For you WIN or LOSE by the WAY YOU CHOOSE...

scott stewart #fundie rr-bb.com

Is it clear now?

Sharon in a coma and Hamas in control!

The only course is destruction!

Anyone in their right mind knows you cannot negoiate with a terrorist nation!

The writing is on the wall!

Hamas, Iran and Syria will continue the terror for land strategy!

Israel can't afford a nuclear Iran!

The only course is war!

The prince of peace is knocking on the door!

Are you ready to commit to Him!

He is coming soon!

When the whole world looks to the dividing of Jerusalem then you will know!

He is right at the door!

Jim #sexist blog.jim.com

Women cannot do men’s jobs, and the pretense that they can and are is doing immense damage to men’s work and the creation of value by men.

Women in men’s positions subtract value. Women in powerful male positions subtract enormous amounts of value. Men at work get paid for creating value, and are forced to pay women for destroying the value that men create.

The reason for female under representation among top engineers, scientists, etc, is that women are slightly less competent on average and have a narrower distribution.

The reason for female under representation among CEOs is moral and emotional, unrelated to competence. Women are very competent managers. A woman has always managed my affairs, and generally done so very well, but women are uncomfortable running things without a strong alpha male supervising them and approving their work from time to time. If they don’t get the supervision that they emotionally need from someone masculine, patriarchal, and sexy, they start acting maliciously, and self destructively, running the operation off the road and into the ground in a subconscious effort to force an alpha male to appear and give them a well deserved beating. The problem is that if she does not get the supervision that she emotionally needs, she will maliciously run the operation into the ground, like a wife married to a beta male husband whom she despises, destroying the family assets and the lives of their children.

Happens every single time, as near to every single time as makes no difference, no matter how smart and competent and hard working they are. Exceptions are so rare as to be nonexistent for all practical purposes.

...

I would explain the fact that a company with a female founder was one eighth as likely to get follow on funding by the fact that absolutely none of them should have received funding, and the only reason that any of them got any follow on funding was that the venture capitalists wanted to deny that anything was wrong. The official and enforced explanation is that it is proof of irrational hatred and misogyny by venture capitalists. And if you doubt this, you obviously must hate women.

So, to decide between these two explanations, let us look at company acquisitions. When venture capitalists fund a company, they intend it that if it succeeds it will be acquired by a big company. If a company is not acquired, the venture capitalists have pissed away their money. Most times they lose, sometimes they win big.

So, that eleven percent of companies with all male founders were acquired represents the venture capitalists winning one time in nine.

With all female founders, they won one time in two hundred and seventy. With all female founders they had only one thirtieth the chance as with all male founders.

One might suppose that this indicates that women are one thirtieth as likely to be able to operate a company as a man, but obviously this conclusion is absurd. The companies must have been acquired for political brownie points, not because they were being operated successfully. It is as plain as the nose on your face that women are absolutely disastrous when given this kind of authority, but official sources will deny what is spitting in their faces and kicking them in the balls, so how do we check this? Are they insane, or am I insane?

Answer: Look at companies with both male and female founders. If the reason is misogyny, then the female founder will have no effect, because the purchasers will assume she is only there for decoration and to warm the bed of the real founders.

So, if misogyny, companies with mixed founders should be purchased at roughly the same rate as companies with all male founders.

If the problem is that women are just naturally incompetent as CEOs, then companies with mixed founders should be purchased at a somewhat lower rate, as the male founders carry the female founders on their backs while the purported female founders paint their nails, powder their faces, and discuss their most recent booty call from Jeremy Meeks.

If, however, the problem is that women in power just invariably and uniformly act like feral animals, as if they had been raised by apes in the jungle, then zero companies with mixed founders will be purchased. If the problem is that the female founders need to be placed in cages and put on leashes, but the male founders are not allowed to do so, then zero companies with mixed founders will be purchased. If the problem is that these days women are no longer subject to the restraints of civilization, then zero companies with mixed founders will be purchased.

Well, guess what.

If a woman has a strong husband who is himself wealthy and powerful, and she washes his dishes and sorts his socks, then she can be a good CEO. Today, however, husbands are generally weak, and therefore competent female CEOs correspondingly rare.

Females can no more do large group socialization than they can chop wood with an axe, or clear a path through the jungle with a machete. Females in or near positions of power have a disastrous effect on the social cohesion of the group to which they belong, on the propensity of group members to cooperate with each other, on the asabiyyah of the group, on the group’s capability to pursue goals in common.

It is a standard psychiatric finding that women are supposedly more agreeable than men, and in very important ways they are.

If tell a woman I have mislaid my keys, she will find them. In this sense women really are more agreeable than men.

If I tell a woman to get me coffee, she will get me coffee. In this sense women really are more agreeable than men.

If I slap a woman on the backside, she will yelp and jump, but then smile and laugh. In this sense women really are more agreeable than men.

But who is it that interrupts the boss?

It is always a woman. Yes, she interrupts in a supposedly friendly, supportive, and agreeable manner, but interrupting is in reality unfriendly, undermines him, and is in fact disagreeable.

Women are catty. Two women are friends, three women are a contest to see which two will become friends. Women are disruptive. They never stop shit testing their bosses. If a woman interrupts her boss, talks over her boss, even though her interruption is supposedly friendly, supportive, and all that, as it always supposedly is, she is disrupting and damaging the organization.

Women take advantage of and abuse restrictions on physical violence, and other rules commanding prosocial behavior, which abuse undermines prosocial behavior and impairs large group cooperation between males. Women are bad for and disruptive of any large group that attempts to cooperate to get something done. They undermine asabiyya, throwing sand in the wheels just for the hell of it. They are always throwing down shit tests to find which male is alpha enough to subdue their bad behavior, always disrupting, always looking for a well deserved spanking.

The psychiatric category of “agreeableness” is cooked to support the doctrine that women are wonderful. It conflates going along with bad behavior, with going along with good behavior. It declares resisting bad behavior to be disagreeable, while ruthlessly and cynically imposing on good behavior is supposedly not disagreeable.

Yes, women really are wonderful in their proper sphere. In power, they are only tolerable to the extent that strong males keep them in line.

A more accurate analysis of female behavior is that females are bad at, and bad for, large group social dynamics. Female or substantially female businesses fail, often fail very badly. Women are better at one on one dynamics than men – all women, all the time. Worse at large group dynamics than men. All women, all the time. All women are like that.

It is obvious to me that women are having a devastating effect on male efforts to create wealth, and I have long been puzzled at other people’s inability to see what is not merely right in front of their faces, but repeatedly spitting in their face and then slapping them.

A business appoints a female boss because progress. She acts in an angry hostile manner, infuriating customers and vital employees, disruptively knocking the business off track instead of keeping it on track, as if the business was a beta husband, and she wanted a divorce with the house, the children, and alimony. Business goes down the tubes. No one notices. Supposedly the business ran into mysterious head winds that have absolutely no connection to the new boss whatsoever.

When males aggress, they get in each other’s faces, they shout, there is always a hint of the possibility it might turn physical, a suggestion of physical menace. Women aggress and disrupt in a more passive manner, and these days we are not allowed to react to female aggression by shouting at them and getting in their faces, by menacing them. It used to be, within living memory, within my memory, that female misbehavior was met with a male response that hinted at the possibility that she might get spanked, put in a metaphorical cage, or put in metaphorical or literal irons, just as an aggressively misbehaving male got then and gets today a response that hints at the possibility of a punch in the face or imprisonment. Women today therefore routinely aggress and disrupt in a manner I find shocking, crazy, disgraceful, bizarre, and extreme, and do so with shocking and disgraceful impunity, as if within my lifetime women came to be possessed by demons, and everyone is walking around like zombies pretending to not notice. Recall in the infamous interview, Jordan Peterson looks away from Kathy before calling out her bad behavior, because if he looked her in the face while calling out her bad behavior it would have been socially unacceptable, because women are supposedly wonderful.

A male quarrels with a male. They get in each other’s faces, you feel that violence might happen, or at least one of them will call security and have the other shown the door. They have the body language of two male goats about to butt heads over possession of a female goat.

A female quarrels with a male. She interrupts him and talks over him in a supposedly friendly and supportive way “So what you are really saying is …”

A male who intends to aggress against another male who is ignoring him intrudes into the other male’s space and just plain gets close enough that the male he is aggressing against has to drop what he is doing and pay attention. Again we see the body language of two male goats about to butt heads over a female goat.

A female who intends to aggress against a male who is ignoring her also intrudes, but not so close, and proceeds to interrupt what he is doing and distract him with some halfway plausible excuse as to why he has to stop what he is doing and pay attention to her, which excuse is something that in theory should not irritate him, and he has trouble understanding why he is irritated, and why she lacks any real interest in the nominal justification that she supposedly has for demanding his attention and interrupting his activities. Supposedly she is helping him in a friendly pleasant nice way, though her “help” is hostile, nasty, angry, disruptive and entirely unwanted, and she ignores his forceful denials that he needs any such “help”.

We need a society where women feel that if they act like Cathy Newman did in that infamous interview with Jordan Peterson, they might get slapped in the face, or sent to the kitchen and the bedroom and restricted from getting out except on a short leash. But if Jordan had responded to her bad behavior by getting in her face as if she was a man, they would probably have called security and tossed him out. Notice that whenever Jordan calls out Cathy Newman’s bad behavior he looks away and gives a little laugh. If he called out her bad behavior while looking at her, it would have been socially unacceptable. What needs to be socially acceptable is that her husband should have given her a slap in the face for publicly disgracing his family with her bad behavior. The same government policies that helicoptering women into powerful positions are allowing them to act badly and destructively in those positions.

As affirmative action makes the differences between men and women starkly and dramatically visible to everyone, at the same time it makes it a criminal offense to notice, or even think about, those differences.

A woman in power is like a woman who finds herself the breadwinner, and her husband is a kitchen bitch, like a dog who finds himself the alpha male of the household, like a woman who intrudes into a males space and proceeds to feminize it and make it hostile to males. She behaves badly in an unconscious effort to smoke the alpha male out of hiding by provoking him to give her a beating.

Supposedly the reason there are so few female CEOs is because of evil sexism, not because boards keep appointing female CEOs and those CEOs keep driving their companies into the ditch. From time to time some big important Harvard expert informs us that female headed or female founded companies do better than male companies, but they will not show us their data, which data conspicuously flies in the face of common sense, anecdote, and casual observation. And if you ask to see their data, you are a racist sexist islamophobic misogynist, and the only reason you could be asking such an obviously hateful question is because you just hate women and are trying to harm them by asking hate questions about hate facts. Also, you are anti science and a global warming denier. We ignorant hateful hicks who keep asking to see the evidence that women can do a man’s job are just like those ignorant hateful hicks who keep asking to see the evidence for global warming. We are anti science, because the science is settled.

Well, fortunately, a surprisingly truthful feminist chick went looking for the data.

Her graphics were truthful, but somewhat misleading, as she de-emphasized and partially hid the most important and dramatic datum, so I edited her graphics for clarity. The graphic at the start of this post is mine, but based on her data and graphics.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy truthernews.wordpress.com

The birth of modern terrorism essentially begins and ends with the illegal state of Israel. History clearly shows that the ideology of Zionism will stop at nothing to advance its political agenda even if it means killing their own. Like the Nazis before them, the Zionists must be condemned, ridiculed and ultimately tried for their crimes against humanity, should this world ever wish to live in peace.

“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” ~Voltaire

The trail of terror left by Israel and its raving Zionists has been censored by the mainstream media as well as alternative media outlets such as Infowars and PrisonPlanet who allegedly tell the truth in respect to the history of state-sponsored terror. The bloody history of Israeli terror is crystal clear and any tv broadcaster, radio host, news source, news agency or media outlet unwilling to address the Zionist regime and their dirty deeds are clearly de facto agents of this most despicable and anti-human machine known as Zionism.
Cowardice asks the question: is it safe? Expediency asks the question: is it politic? Vanity asks the question: is it popular? But conscience asks the question: is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular- but one must take it simply because it is right. ~Martin Luther King Jr.

Patria Bombing (1940)
On November 25, 1940, Zionist terrorists bombed a ship entitled the “Patria” in Haifa harbor in false-flag terror attack which was to be blamed on the occupying British for political gain. The terrorist bombing killed 240 Jewish refugees and injured 172. The Patria bombing was taken directly from Protocol 10 of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

King David Hotel Bombing (1946)
Dressed as Arabs, Zionist terrorists bombed the King David Hotel in Jerusalem on July 22, 1946. 91 people were killed and 46 were injured in the deadly bombing. The terror attack was led by Menachem Begin who later became the 6th Prime Minister of Israel. The King David Hotel Bombing is seen by many historians as the birth of modern terrorism.

Albert Einstein’s Letter Against Zionism (1948)
In an open letter written to the New York Times on December 4, 1948, prominent Jews such as Albert Einstein and 27 others publicly stated that, “The newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), is a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties.” Coincidentally, just days before Einstein was to go on television and speak about Zionist atrocities and the illegal state of Israel, Einstein suffered an aortic aneurysm and died. Einstein reportedly took the speech he was preparing to the hospital, but didn’t live long enough to complete it. Einstein’s timely death ensured that the world was never properly informed about evils of Zionism, the state of Israel and their war crimes against the people of Palestine.

The Lavon Affair (1954)
Dressed as Arabs, 9 Zionist terrorists bombed a post office, library and theatre in Egypt as part of “Operation Susanna” during the summer of 1954. The operation became widely known as the “Lavon Affair” after the Israeli defense minister Pinhas Lavon was forced to resign due to his role in the terror attacks.

Israeli Hijack (1954)
The first act of air piracy in the history of civil aviation was carried out by Israel in December of 1954 when a civilian Syrian airliner was forced down in Tel Aviv and its passengers and crew were held for days by Israeli terrorists. Despite international condemnation, the Israeli terrorists refused to release the hostages.

Israeli Political Assassinations (1956-Present)
Since 1956, the Israeli Mossad has openly conducted at least 75 major political assassination operations around the globe which have killed thousands of innocent civilians in the collateral damage. No evidence, no trial, no jury, just outright murder and bloodshed by the state of Israel.

USS Liberty Attack (1967)
The USS Liberty was attacked by the Israeli military on June 8, 1967, when Air Force jet fighter aircraft and Israeli Navy torpedo boats conducted a surprise attack on the American ship while it was in international waters. The unprovoked attack killed 34 U.S. sailors and wounded 170. To date, Israel has never apologized for the premeditated attack.

Israeli Airport Terror (1968)
In 1968, Israeli commando terrorists blew up 13 civilian airliners at Beirut airport in Beirut, Lebanon. Unfortunately, this major terrorist attack committed by the state of Israel is highly underreported.

Nuclear Proliferation (1970’s)
According to documents discovered by an American academic, the state of Israel offered to proliferate nuclear weapons on the black market to South Africa in the 1970’s. Although Israel has not and will not confirm that they have nuclear weapons, despite a large amount of evidence showing they have as many as 200 nuclear warheads, Israel did have enough nuclear weapons to proliferate. Israel is joined only by India, Pakistan and North Korea as the only non-signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Israeli STRATFOR & Alex Jones (1996-Present)
On February 12, 2012, the story broke that radio host Alex Jones was likely the intelligence tool of STRATFOR, a Zionist intelligence agency located in Austin, Texas. STRATFOR admits to being an intelligence gathering center and therefore it stands to reason that Alex Jones and his affiliates of Inforwars and PrisonPlanet have likely been gathering intelligence, data and info on patriotic Americans since 1996, coincidently the exact same year that STRATFOR was founded.

The Alex Jones Show boasts a radio audience of over 3 million gun-owning Americans. Essentially, Alex Jones is the unofficial Commander and Chief of the largest militia the world has ever seen. With this unprecedented concentration of power into the hands of one man it is imperative that people take a second look at Jones the Israeli STATFOR behind him. The fear is that Alex Jones is a disinformation agent sent to provocateur violence in the midst of a national tragedy.

The goal of Alex Jones and his Zionist handlers is to get America to destroy herself the same way that Russia was destroyed under Stalin by dividing and then collapsing society upon itself by baiting Americans into a violent revolution against their own police and military. The Alex Jones STRATFOR connection is taken directly from Protocol 2 of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

9/11 Attacks (2001)
The role of the Israeli Mossad in the 9/11 attacks is unmistakable. Although other intelligence agencies were involved as patsies in the attacks, the Israelis Mossad played the role of execution in the 9/11 terror operation. After all, Israel has the most to gain from a U.S. invasion of its Middle Eastern neighbors.

1. Vacating the Twin Towers (Pre 9/11)
Months before 9/11, ZIM (Integrated Shipping Services), an Israeli company, broke its lease losing $50,000 and vacated its office in the North WTC tower. Speculation exists that the vacated office space was used as a staging ground for the explosives used in the demolition of WTC #1 and WTC #2. FBI agent Michael Dick, who had been investigating Israeli espionage before and after 9/11, began investigating the suspicious and timely move by ZIM only to be removed from his duties by the head of the Justice Department’s criminal division, Zionist Michael Chertoff.

2. Israeli Spies in America (Pre 9/11)
Just prior to 9/11, almost 150 Israelis were arrested for suspected espionage after they were caught targeting U.S., military bases, DEA, FBI, Secret Service, ATF, and other government installations throughout America.

3. 9/11 Airport Security (9/11)
ICTS, an Israeli company, was in charge of every 9/11 airport from which the hijacked planes allegedly operated out of. A few hours before the Patriot Act was voted on, it was edited to make foreign companies in charge of security on 9/11 immune to lawsuits. The Patriot Act essentially prevents American courts from demanding that ICTS provide testimony or hand over the missing surveillance videos from the airports.

4. ODIGO: Israeli Instant Messaging Service (9/11)
At least two Israeli employees of ODIGO, an Israeli Instant Messaging Service, received a text message warning them of the 9/11 attack two full hours before the first plane hit the WTC tower on September 11, 2001. ODIGO’s office was only two blocks from the WTC, but no ODIGO employee passed the warning to U.S. authorities. Failure to pass the warning onto WTC security resulted in the deaths of almost 3,000 people.

5. The 5 Dancing Israelis (9/11)
On 9/11, five Israeli men were caught videotaping the Twin Towers prior to the 9/11 attack and began dancing and celebrating with joy after the planes hit the building. The men even photographed themselves smiling in front of the burning wreckage while holding a lighter. After returning to Israel, the men who were later identified as Mossad agents, went on TV and stated that “Our purpose was to document the event”.

6. The 9/11 Truck Bomb (9/11)
On the evening of 9/11, Israelis driving a truck/van bomb with over 1 ton of explosives was apprehended around George Washington Bridge in New York City. The FBI later determined that two of the five Israelis arrested were Israeli Mossad agents.

7. Israeli Spies in America (Post 9/11)
After 9/11, over 60 Israelis, some active Israeli military personnel, were arrested under the Patriot Anti-Terrorism Act or for espionage and immigrations violations within the Unites States.

8. Evidence Linking Israel to 9/11 is Classified (Post 9/11)
According to Fox News and their reporter Carl Cameron, “Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information.” The reason the information is classified is because it would implement Israel in the greatest terror attack the world has ever seen.

Jewish Leader of Al Qaeda (2004-Present)
Since 2004, alleged Al Qaeda mastermind Adam Gadahn has been terrorizing Americans with threats of terror and taunting the deaths of U.S. servicemen and woman. Interestingly, Gadahn is of Jewish decent rather than of Arabic decent. Gadahn’s grandfather was none other than Carl Pearlman, a prominent urologist who sits on the Anti-Defamation League’s Board of Directors. Dressed up as an Arab terrorist, the Jewish Gadahn goes on TV and threatens America and the world with Al Qaeda terror.

London Bombings of 7/7 (2005)
Just prior to the London Bombings of July 7, 2005, the Israeli embassy in London was advised in advance of an impending terror attack. Verint Systems, an Israeli security company with approximately 1000 employees, was the security firm responsible for the CCTV surveillance cameras in the London Underground rail network. Curiously, no CCTV footage of the four Muslims boarding the tube-trains has ever been released by Verint who claim that their cameras were not working that day. A CCTV video of 7/7 would show that the four Muslims “terrorists” never boarded the tube-trains that blew up and that someone else altogether was responsible.

DHS & Israeli Partnership (2008)
The 2008 partnership between Israel and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) ensures that Israel is never investigated for its role in the terror attacks of 9/11. It also allows Israel to commit acts of terrorism in America while DHS looks the other way. The one-sided partnership forces America to keep fighting Israel’s wars while simultaneously providing a shield by which the state of Israel and their Mossad can terrorize America with impunity.

DHS & Israeli Partnership (March, 2010)
In the 2010 partnership, DHS and Israel signed an agreement to work together to share information more quickly about civil aviation incidents. “The real-time exchange of information with our international partners is critical to our efforts to enhance overall global aviation security,” said DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. “This agreement will allow the United States and Israel to better coordinate on, and respond to potential aviation security incidents to strengthen our mutual safety.” As with the 2008 DHS partnership, this agreement makes sure that Israel is never investigated for its role in the attacks of 9/11 and it allows Israel to commit acts of terrorism in the United States while DHS, FAA and the TSA look the other way.

Israeli Stuxnet Virus (June, 2010)
The Stuxnet computer virus is an Israeli computer cyber terror worm discovered in June of 2010. It was initially spread via Microsoft Windows and targets Siemens industrial software and equipment. The virus infected computers in Iran, Indonesia, India, Azerbaijan, United States, Pakistan and many other nations costing billions of dollars in damage. A movie played at a retirement party for the head of the Israel Defense Forces bragged that Israel was indeed responsible for the Stuxnet cyber-attack.

Chicago’s Zionist Rahm Emanuel (Feb, 2011-Present)
Chicago’s mayor as of February 22, 2012 is Rahm Emanuel, the son of an admitted Zionist terrorist who is directly responsible for the brutal genocide of countless Palestinians. Emanuel is Barack Obama’s former White House Chief of Staff and ensures the future whitewash of a major terror attack upon the city of Chicago by the Israeli Mossad. Chicago terror scenarios included an attack on the Sears Tower, an Obama assassination attempt or a bio-terror attack.

Fukushima Nuclear Disaster (March, 2011)
Magna BSP, an Israeli security firm, was responsible for security at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan before, during and immediately after the nuclear disaster of March 11, 2011. Speculation concerning what really happened that terrible day continues to mount as multiple reports state that the nuclear plant was sabotaged by the Israeli security firm who had been on the job less than a year.

Trinidad Assassination Plot Exposed (June, 2011)
Two Israeli citizens were arrested in the Trinidad assassination plot when it was discovered that they had fake passports and that they were part of an Israeli assassination hit team. The couple then mysteriously escaped from their hotel, five months after being placed there under tight security. Authorities are investigating whether Robert and Anastasia, who were pretending to be husband and wife, were in fact a hit-team involved in a plot to assassinate Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar and four members of her cabinet.

Israeli Duqu Virus (Sep, 2011)
The Duqu virus was discovered on September 1, 2011, and appears to a cyber terror worm related to the Israeli Stuxnet virus. As evidenced by the virus’ capabilities, the Duqu virus is programmed to take over computer systems such as nuclear reactors, stock markets, and travel hubs. According to Wikipedia, Duqu looks for information that could be useful in attacking industrial control systems. Based on the modular structure of Duqu, special payloads could be used to attack any type of computer systems by any means and thus cyber-physical attacks based on Duqu are possible.

According to McAfee, one of Duqu’s actions is to steal digital certificates (and corresponding private keys) from attacked computers to help future viruses appear as secure software. The malware attacks software programs that run Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition, or SCADA, systems. Such systems are used to monitor automated plants such as nuclear facilities. Should American nuclear power plants be targeted for terror, the Israeli Duqu virus will the top suspect.

Israeli Arson (Jan, 2012)
A massive blaze that destroyed thousands of hectares in the Chilean National Park of Torres del Paine was the result of arson committed by a 23 year old Israeli “tourist” named Rotem Singer who has been charged with purposely starting the fire. More than 550 government and military personnel from Chile and Argentina and several aircraft were deployed to combat the fire according to the website of Chile’s emergency agency. Interior Minister Rodrigo Hinzpeter said more than 11,000 hectares (27,000 acres) have been consumed in the fire.

Assassination of Obama (Feb, 2012)
Atlanta Jewish Times owner and publisher Andrew Adler called for President Obama’s assassination when he described the third of three options that Israel must take in regards to Iran: “Three, give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel…Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel’s existence…don’t you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles?” The Israeli newspaper Haaretz stated in 2010 that, “Obama’s election may usher a political climate that could produce an assassination attempt…It is most likely, though, to be a lone assassin, he says, rather than an organized network”.

Bio-Terror (Future)
Israel is the only modern nation that has not signed the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (refusal to engage in offensive biological warfare, stockpiling, and use of biological weapons) or the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (which limits the proliferation of nuclear weapons). Should a future nuclear or biological terror attack hit America or any other nation, Israel will be the prime suspect.

CapitalKiller #fundie reddit.com

This is fundamentally a question about illegalism. And there are two questions nestled in here: why do you personally choose to work wage labor instead of crime, and why should people submit to wage labor instead of committing crimes?
When the term “wage slavery” entered the vernacular, it was contemporary with American chattel slavery. It wasn't socialists, or Marxists, etc. that used it. It was slavery abolitionists. Two prominent examples are Frederick Douglass and Harriet Beecher Stowe. While Africans and African descendants were being whipped and killed, some of those who escaped would turn around and compare their previous condition as chattel slaves to their new condition as wage slaves. Thus, it's not a new term, it isn't something invented by academics, socialists, anarchists, or modern anti-capitalists. It was originally a statement that wage relationships are literal slavery. I want everyone to keep this fact in mind, to help frame where I am going with this.

Further, when I say “choose” in the title I don't mean it in the pseudo-choice “voluntaryist” sense, as if either crime or wage slavery are free, peaceful, or voluntary arrangements. But I do mean it in an absurdist or existentialist sense, in that you can in fact wake up one day and decide to go to work at Subway or choose to rob Subway. Alternately, you can choose to lay in bed for days at a time, or hang yourself by a rope in your closet. This does not deny the material conditions that influence one decision over the next (e.g. the consequences of working at Subway versus the consequences of robbing Subway), but rather affirms what Jean-Paul Sartre called “radical freedom.” You don't have to submit, although there may be consequences for not submitting.

I actually don't expect the few illegalists here to answer, and I might even discourage it. I don't want anyone to implicate themselves in a crime. I want you to keep going strong. I'm interested in hearing why people have chosen to submit to wage slavery versus crime. To go back to the first framing point: there were slaves who submitted to slavery, and there were slaves who started insurrections, fought masters, got beaten, got killed, or ran away and escaped. Why are you in the first category (the wage slave who submits) and not the second category (the slave refuses to submit)? If we truly believe that wage slavery is slavery, why are so few anarchists willing to reject wage slavery in full, throw it off, and lay down their own lives (or at least take the high risks of crime) instead of enduring slavery?

In an earlier comment on a different topic I said that I didn't trust anarchists who had not been arrested. This was unpopular. Probably because most anarchists (especially the American Reddit demographic) are not criminals, are not illegalists, and have not been arrested. However, I don't mean this to be a personal attack. The purpose of direct action/illegalist/insurrectionist groups is criminal. You have to be able to trust those people. And a good way of knowing if someone can be trusted, of knowing if someone can handle the inevitable interrogation and criminal justice ringer, is if they've caved under pressure or resisted in the past. If someone has been arrested and they didn't snitch, that's a good sign you can trust them. Further, if someone has been arrested and they did snitch, you've weeded them out. This does not even need to be a political/social/anarchist crime. It reflects upon how well someone is able to cope with arrest and provides an indication of their trustworthiness and dependability.

This is not “who is a better anarchist.” It's a practical tactic for forming illegalist, insurrectionist, and direct action groups with people you can trust.
(I wont go into people who are arrested and become informants, unfortunately you just may not know. And so there are some limitations here. But, in most cases, if someone is arrested and snitches you will find out during the legal discovery process or the street grapevine.)
There was one response that said I “glorify crime,” “romanticize crime,” or something to that effect. Friends, if you've read any illegalist literature, it all glorifies and romanticizes crime. The act of crime in and of itself, be it illegalist (e.g. for your own financial gain to avoid wage slavery) or insurrectionist (illegal, but for political/anti-political and without lucrative purpose), is supposed to be liberating. In fact, every time someone posts a picture of a riot, a burnt police car, calls an arrested anarchist a hero, etc. they're glorifying crime. Look at Bonanno's "Armed Joy" - does this not glorify crime?

Now, there is no glory and nothing romantic about prison. Prison sucks. There is nothing glorious about a lynched slave. But this does not mean that crime itself is neither glorious nor romantic, nor liberating, nor joyful, nor beautiful. We don't blame the anarchist criminal here for being a victim. We blame the prisons. We blame the lynchers. The anarchist criminal is not at fault. The state, the prisons, and the police are. As a minor footnote, in anarchist revolutions past and present (Spain and Rojava), “martyrs” were/are glorified and elevated. In Spain, militias were named after anarchists killed in heroic attacks on fascists. In Rojava, there are murals painted and walls plastered with the pictures of revolutionaries who died fighting Daesh.

There's nothing great about getting killed, either. But this does not mean that getting killed – or going to prison, or getting arrested – is not the inevitable consequence a heroic revolutionary act. In fact, it's something you have to accept as a revolutionary, an illegalist. It's something everyone who fought in Spain, or who are currently fighting in Rojava, have accepted. Thus it is both an inevitable and necessary act of individual and collective revolutionary struggle. We should treat the anarchist martyr, the illegalist, or the prisoner, the same way we we would treat the failed runaway slave, or the failed slave revolt leaders, who are ultimately caught and killed by slave hunters. They were brave, they tried, they didn't make it, but maybe someone else will. Who condemns the runaway slave for trying to escape?

Why, then, is there so much opposition to crime from anarchists? Not necessarily in word (although also, unfortunately, a lot in word), but in deed. And why do so few anarchists seem to be criminals (at least in the USA)? What is holding you back, exactly? Why isn't illegalism a real trend – and not only a trend, but the most prominent trend – for anarchists?

John B. Carpenter, Ph.D. #fundie ipost.christianpost.com

Full civil rights for blacks in the USA has been a positive for all Americans. Whites are better off with African-Americans not compelled to sit in the back of the bus or attend second-rate schools. The expansion of justice for black Americans has meant that white Americans don't have to fear an aggrieved under-class is going to break out in race riots. They are better off morally and spiritually in not treating some of their neighbors as inferiors. Civil rights for ethnicities is a positive sum game, meaning we all come out winners. "Freedom and justice for all"results in a positive gain for all.

But "gay rights" is different. With every expansion of "gay rights" comes a loss of freedom for others, particularly those who, whether for religious or purely rational reasons, refuse to acknowledge the functional and moral equivalency of homosexuality. It is a zero-sum-game, meaning when one side wins, the other loses. A baker or florist or photographer or reception hall owner who believes that homosexuality is wrong and does not want to offer his services to a homosexual wedding is now increasingly likely to be compelled to do so or face the loss of freedom to earn a living. Today people are facing the choice between whether to stay true to their beliefs or lend material support to a practice they regard as immoral.

Just here, the homosexual rights advocate will insist that this is no different than the white racist having to serve blacks at his lunch counter or let them sit at the front of the bus, if they so choose. The difference is that in no case was discriminating against blacks called for by a religion. Some misguided churches may have interpreted their religion that way but the pages of the Bible are quite clear that "in Christ there is no Jew nor Greek" (Gal. 2:28) that the Lord wants us to "do justice" (Micah 6:8). Even such churches that succumbed to the cultural sin of racism were the minority. The late Professor Robert Fogel, Nobel laureate, found that it was Christians who ended the institution of slavery. Other religions also do not call their adherents to oppress people based on race. I know of no major religion that supports racism. Hence, there never was a precedent of a religion encouraging people to oppress a race and that was over-ridden by the constitution's "equal protection" clause.

What we have now is something entirely new in US history: people's 1st amendment rights to practice their faith are being abrogated for the sake of furthering legal legitimization to a sexual preference. The Puritans came to America for the right to live and worship as they believed God had told them in the Bible. Now that right is being stripped from Christians in the nation they helped create. As homosexual rights increase; Christians' freedoms decrease.

Power Point Paradise #fundie powerpointparadise.com

HOW MS MEDIA RIDICULE DRAGONS

ANIMAL PLANET "MYTHIFIED& DEBUNKED" DRAGONS and OUR STATS WENT DOWN!
MAIN STREAM MEDIA BRAINWASHING MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! THE LEMMINGS FALL IN LINE!
They don't want people to research these things, because The-Powers_That-Be pushed Evolution on us to destroy Western Civilisation! Their scientific figureheads took the money to lie &over up the truth &now their academic following all believe we "CAME FROM A ROCK!"

WITH HOAXES!
(EXCERPT ARTICLE FROM THE TELEGRAPH JAN 2004)

"A pickled dragon that looks as if it might once have flown around Hogwarts has been found in a garage in Oxfordshire. Yesterday the baby dragon, in a sealed 30in jar, was in the office of Allistair Mitchell, who runs a marketing company in Oxford. He was asked to investigate by his friend, David Hart, from Sutton Courtenay, who discovered it. A metal tin found with the dragon contained paperwork in old-fashioned German of the 1890s."

"All they had to do in this case, which turned out to be another debunking hoax, to find out whether it was real or not, like alternative news www.rense.com noted: "A one minute X-ray will answer the question instantly. lf there is NO X-ray taken, we have a cover up. In all likelihood, an X-ray analysis has already been done..." --Editor Rense.com"

Well, it turned out it was a hoax by a Media company and a Media prop-making company. The Smithsonian Institute is actually rumored to possess real dragon remains. Many real proofs & artifacts are lying around locked up in vaults somewhere, and some were actually destroyed by Evolutionary hijackers of Science!

And how many genuine sightings have been denied and shoved from the frontpages of the hijacked media. They should throw open the Smithonian Institute and archives of ALL "Natural" History museums everywhere, to bring to light hidden proofs that Dragons were & are still ALIVE today and aren't"Dinosaurs!"

WELL, ENJOY THE PICS.
HOPE YOU HAVE A NICE PARADIGM SHIFT!
LET'S START WITH SOME HISTORY:

[...]

BRITAIN now called WALES

The early Britons, from whom the modern Welsh are descended, provide us with our earliest surviving European accounts of reptilian monsters, one of whom killed and devoured king Morvidus (Morydd) in about 336 BC. We are told in the original early Welsh account (which Geoffrey of Monmouth translated into Latin and which still survives in spite of modernist claims to the contrary 4) that the monster "gulped down the body of Morvidus as a big fish swallows a little one." Geoffrey wrote of the monster under its Latin name, Belua.
Morvidus, by the way, was a merciless cruel tyrant. So he seemed to reap what he dished out.

OF COURSE DARWINIST/CULTURAL MARXIST GATEKEEPER WIKIPEDIA CALLS KING MORVIDUS MYTHICAL! HA!
WHAT ELSE WOULD YOU EXPECT...

Peredur, not the ancient king of that name (306 - 296 BC), but a much later son of Earl Efrawg, had better luck than Morvidus, actually managing to slay his monster, an addanc (pronounced athanc: variant afanc,) at a place called Llyn Llion in Wales.
At other Welsh locations the addanc is further spoken of along with another reptilian species known as the carrog. The addanc survived until comparatively recent times at such places as Bedd-yr-Afanc near Brynberian, at Llyn-yr-Afanc above Bettws-y-Coed on the River Conwy (the killing of this monster was described in the year 1693), and Llyn Barfog. A carrog is commemorated at Carrog near Corwen, and at Dol-y-Carrog in the Vale of Conwy.

SWEDEN

Lindorm, Lindworm
(Swedish for Dragon)

A 19th century Scandinavian creature rumored to be a "mythical" dragon-like beast was often seen in the country around marshes, caves, and large bodies of water. There have been 40 plus eyewitness accounts of this creature.

Reports have the Lindorm being 10-20 feet long, with a body as thick as a man's thigh, black with yellow-flamed belly, a mouth full of white shining sharp teeth, large saucer like eyes, and an unwieldy body. It behaves like a snake when cornered. It will rear up on it's tail in a strike or pounce stance, behave in an aggressive and powerful manner and is also very ill tempered. It is difficult to destroy and when successfully killed will emit a foul smelling odor when in its final death throes.

Lindorms remain on land until too large to move about easily then it takes to the water where it again begins to grow. Although there are many witnesses, there has been no physical evidence of the existence of Lindorms, which has led some to believe in "collective hallucinations." However, due to the high number of first hand accounts, not to mention the absurdity of collective or group hallucinations, it is more likely to have been a very live creature at one time and perhaps still! It does not seem likely that 40 plus people could describe the same creature unless they have actually seen it!

In legend, the german hero Siegfried conquered a lindwyrm that lived near the town of Worms in Germany.

NORWAY, DANMARK

And why did the Norsmen or Vikings get the idea to put Dragon heads on their boats? Because they had never seen them pop out of the water and scare them half to death? Or just because of that, so they could scare the marine dragons with it.

DRAGONS in FRANCE?

THE TARASQUE OF NERLUC

The city of Nerluc in France was renamed Tarascon in honor of the killing of a dragon there, called the Tarasque. This animal was bigger than an ox and had long, sharp, pointed horns on its head. There were a number of different horned dinosaurs, like the Triceratops.
[Info & image: "The Great Dinosaur Mystery" by Paul Taylor]

Here is an old postcard from the city with the spiked beast.

image

THE LEGEND

The Tarasque haunted the banks of the River Rhone in Nerluc. It had six limbs and was spawned by the serpent Leviathan, but in time it came to haunt Southern France. A traveller named Jacques du Bois was journeying along the banks of that river one evening, and he was so focused on the terrifying rumours he had heard of the Tarasque that he failed to hear a deep rumble. Suddenly the Tarasque appeared and with a deafening roar, it ignited the luckless du Bois with a steady stream of fire.

[...]

Does Darwin dare to make
Marco Polo out a LIAR???

image
image

MESOPOTAMIAN DRAGONS
BABYLON

THE 'SIRRUSH'

In 600 B.C., an artist carved 3 animals in the archway of the Ishtar Gate in Babylon.
The three animals were a lion, a wild ox & the Sirrush.
Why was this supposedly mythical creature pictured with two known animals? Was it because it wasn't a myth? The sirrush was described as slender bodied, scale covered creature with a horn atop it's head. Nebuchadnezzar was the king of Babylonia at the time and the Bible mentions that his priests kept a great dragon or serpent that they worshipped.
The creature closely resembles a type of dinosaur, a sauropod. Since the Babylonians did not have the ability to reconstruct fossil remains it is more likely they were drawing a living animal that they had seen. The drawings and carvings of the sirrush were always the same and never varies which normally indicates they were based on a real creature. [Text courtesy Shadowlands]

THEY ALSO MADE A SCULPTURE OF THE BEAST Caption above - "The head of a dragon, the symbol of Marduk, sculpted in bronze and dating from c. 300-600 B.C., was found in Mesopotamia and is now in the Louvre Museum, Paris" - - Image from "Dragons: A Natural History" by Dr. Karl Shuker.

[...]

CENTRAL AMERICA

DRAGONS IN PERU

ICA or ICCA STONES

The simple farmer who originally found and tried to sell them, was "impressed" by authorities, to confess that he had made all those hundreds of stones by himself, or else....

The stones show clear dinosaurs interacting with humans. And for Darwinist controlled Archaeology departments all around the world, that is a No No, of course.

JasonCarswell #conspiracy rationalwiki.org

I despise this cliché but you sheeple need to WAKE THE FUCK UP!

## Lies: God (duh), capitalism (debt slavery), patriotism (not the same as community), exceptionalism (really? I mean really???), mainstream news (propaganda), benevolent governments don't exploit and oppress you (all governments are bad, period).
## America may be the richest country in the world, but you are not rich. This has nothing to do with boot straps. Most people work hard and most people are poor. (See the Wikipedia article on Perception gap.)
## You have the largest most oppressive military and secret agencies overtly and covertly active all around the world, and you do not control it. You're voice doesn't matter. A Princeton study of political influence shows the US oligarchy is not a democracy.
## The global war on terror is a fraud and has replaced the cold war (also hyper inflated) as a justification for the military industrial complex. The US military is consuming 60% of the disposable budget of the federal government as of fiscal year 2015. It's consuming 16% of the total federal budget. More than the next 8 countries combined - and that hollow military can't win a war.
## You have a farce of a democracy, choose the lesser of two evils then switch to the other evil when this one doesn't work out - all just for show. The secret and military worlds are money laundering machines at tax payers expense. The Chinese have already won WW3.
## You have the "greatest" Hollywood and corporate lamestream propaganda brainwashing machine. (See the Wikipedia article on Concentration of media ownership.)
## Don't believe the hype! You've been hypnotized to believe that the government and police monopoly on violence[wp] is to help you.
## When you think of Russian KGB, their propaganda, and Siberian prisons - that's nothing compared to the USA, it's "news", and the prison industrial complex.
## Hitler, the Fatherland, slave concentration camps, the Jews and non-pure-bloods = Shillary/Drumpf, Homeland Security, the US prison industrial complex for African Americans, Muslims, "illegals", and immigrants. (Some fucking melting pot.)
## Of the 10 high level threats to humanity the US only focuses on 2, interstate conflict and terrorism (because they are profitable). The 8 that are unstudied by governance are poverty, infectious disease, environmental degradation, civil war, genocide, other atrocities, proliferation in trans national crime.
## If you think things are shitty now, the oncoming global collapse, ocean life collapse, civil war and world war will knock you on your ass. And after it comes you'll still say I am crazy because you bought and paid for the hype.

Paul M. Dohse Sr. #fundie paulspassingthoughts.com

Life has taught me some things about death. When I lost my grandmother some years ago, I found that I was unable to accept it. So, I pondered the situation and came to a conclusion: it is ok not to accept death in general or the death of someone close to you; because God doesn’t accept death either. Death is not OK with God; he hates it, and according to the Bible, it is the “last enemy that will be defeated.” When someone close to you dies, a piece of you goes with them; you will now have to find your new normal. You are now less than you were; you must re-calibrate, that’s just the way it is. Death is always a metaphysical subtraction from life.

Death is not a part of life; that’s a bunch of baloney.

There are not worse things in life than death; that’s a bunch of baloney also.

I have seen people in conditions that are so bad that you couldn’t even begin to imagine what it would be like; yet, they hang on to life anyway. Why? According to their testimonies, they are afraid to die. I know people who have a very limited life but want to make the best of what they have, and my career is all about helping them to do that. As long as they are in the fight, I am in it with them.

People hang on to life in hope that they will find some peace about death. They hope they will find definitive answers about death that will enable them to travel through that gate. In our culture that’s difficult because of propaganda spread by those who sell salvation. In geographies where people live from hand to mouth, you can always count on the following: popes, pastors, and self proclaimed apostles are living in splendor. Salvation is big business. What will a peasant pay to save their soul? Everything, including their last penny for one meal.

One of the biggest selling points of religion follows: the church is a sanctuary city from an angry God who wants to punish you in hell for every sin you ever committed. Our view of God and our perception of him is almost helplessly distorted. Christ is presented as a second God of grace that saves us from a God of wrath. This is behind the Christo-centric theology of the church which presents itself as the “under-shepherd” of Christ. The church sells the idea that individual reason and logic cannot understand reality; hence, what we read in our Bibles contradicts what we hear in church, and the result is total confusion about who God is.

Fear of death is compounded because of confusion about God. Fear is the church’s primary selling point. John Calvin and Martin Luther said so.

Hebrews Chapter 2:

Now when it says “all things,” it means nothing is left out. But we have not yet seen all things put under their authority [that is, angels]. 9What we do see is Jesus, who for a little while was given a position “a little lower than the angels”; and because he suffered death for us [“pas” means “all” viz, he suffered death for all], he is now “crowned with glory and honor.” Yes, by God’s grace [love], Jesus tasted death for everyone. 10God, for whom and through whom everything was made, chose to bring many children into glory. And it was only right that he should make Jesus, through his suffering, a perfect leader, fit to bring them into their salvation.

11So now Jesus and the ones he makes holy have the same Father. That is why Jesus is not ashamed to call them his brothers and sisters. 12For he said to God,

“I will proclaim your name to my brothers and sisters.
I will praise you among your assembled people.”

13He also said,

“I will put my trust in him,”
that is, “I and the children God has given me.”

14Because God’s children are human beings—made of flesh and blood—the Son also became flesh and blood. For only as a human being could he die, and only by dying could he break the power of the devil, who had [past tense] the power of death. 15Only in this way could he set free all who have lived their lives as slaves to the fear of dying.

16We also know that the Son did not come to help angels; he came to help the descendants of Abraham. 17Therefore, it was necessary for him to be made in every respect like us, his brothers and sisters, so that he could be our merciful and faithful High Priest before God. Then he could offer a sacrifice [ONE] that would take away [not cover, or temporarily take away] the sins of the people. 18Since he himself has gone through suffering and testing, he is able to help us when we are being tested.

NLT [My comments in brackets].

In the Bible; sin, fear, and death are synonymous. If one is still under sin, they are still in slavery to the fear of death. Note, in this passage, that the only thing that frees us from the slavery of fear is Christ’s death…period. Christ’s death makes it possible for us to be God’s literal children, and Christ’s brothers and sisters. We become literal family members of God. Christ went before us to free us from the fear of death.

Note what is missing here: Christ’s imputation of perfect law-keeping. If that is necessary, we are necessarily still under the slavery of fear and death. Perfect law-keeping, no matter who keeps it, is not what frees us from death’s slavery, only kinship does.

Without fear of death, religion has no product to sell, and there are other things that are very bad for business as well: the idea that God wants to save everyone; the idea that people are able to choose God to be free from the slavery of fear, the doctrine of the Rapture, and the idea that God hates death and gave his only Son to vanquish it from reality forever.

The stakes of life are highest in regard to the death issue, and reason’s logical conclusions regarding death and God are the only things that will assure us, and…

…that’s bad for business as well.

paul

Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D. #fundie disqus.com

Crunch:

Relative to there being slavery, you need to get your head out of the Cathlic sand and read the Christian Bible! In our Bible, word "slave" appears only twice, and both times it is ascribed a negative connotation, duh! Relative to the slavery as existed in the United States of America, whereby Blacks from Africa were kidnapped by the carpet pilot Mooslim and sold to the Cathlic for transportation and resale in the Americas, our Bible explicitly prohibits such modus operandi! To wit, "And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death." Exodus 21:16. Therefore, the only thing that was needed, and is still needed, to stop slavery is for the Christian to start implementing true Christianity and Bible based morality.

So can we count on you to support a real Christian crusade to Middle Eastern deserts and other Moohamadan lands to liberate them from slavery in the name of Jesus the Christ, or are you just another armchair quarterback?

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

Alhough the Globalist CIA agents who almost always win the "prestigious" Nobel Peace Prize are instantly puffed-up on the front page of Sulzberger's Slimes; Nobel Laureates in the scientific or literary fields are generally confined to the inner pages. This is not the case with 2015's Literature winner - Svetlana Alexievich of Belarussia (small allied "sister state" of Russia).

Far from being back-paged, Ms. Alexievich is prominently plastered smack-dab in the center of the all-important front page. News of her victory has also been prominently mentioned by the TV talking heads of America and vassaled Europe. This is unusual for two reasons. First of all, she's not an American. Why such hype over a Belarussian? Secondly, her works are not even widely read in English - the de facto "international language". So, what's up with the sudden shout-out for Sveltana? Moreover, why was the Nobel Prize for Literature even awarded to a non-fiction writer in the first place? That hasn't happened in 50 years!

Liitle known Svetlana of little known Belarussia was suddenly immortalized by the Cool Kids Club of the West.

The astute and discerning real intellectuals who read The Anti-New York Times will have already deduced a theory behind the unusual and overnight hyping of the previously unknown Ms. Alexievich. Excerpts from the article itself will serve to confirm those suspicions - as they did for your rat-smelling reporter and his rat-killing feline sidekick here.

Check out these excerpts, and our analysis:

Excerpt: Ms. Alexievich often took risks by taking on contentious elements of Soviet history and challenging the official narrative.

Analysis: Well, the old Soviets were not exactly choir boys. Criticizing the old regime wouldn't necessarily make her a traitor. Continue.

Excerpt: She was seen as a traitor, as unpatriotic,” said Gerald Howard, the executive editor at Doubleday. He published Ms. Alexievich’s book “Zinky Boys: Soviet Voices From a Forgotten War,” about the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and the trauma experienced by the Russian soldiers and their families. The title refers to the zinc coffins that dead Russian soldiers were sent home in. “She was vilified all over the place for this book,” he said, “and she didn’t back down for a second."

Analysis: Red flag! Alarm bells! In 1979. the Soviets were baited into Afghanistan after a CIA rent-an-army (just like the "rebels" in Syria) overthrew a non-aligned government and set up a hostile regime on Russia's border. This is not to defend the old USSR, but any Soviet writer who cast blame on their own country for the Jimmy Carter-Zbig Brzezinski proxy war in Afghanistan, was, in fact, a traitor to her country.

Instead of blaming Carter, Brzezinski and the Globalists for the suffering caused by the proxy Afghan War "bear trap" against Russia, seditious Svetlana blamed her own country.

Excerpt: Because of her criticism of the government in Belarus, a former Soviet republic, Ms. Alexievich has periodically lived abroad, in Italy, France, Germany and Sweden, among other places.

Analysis: So, long after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, this bitch is still a causing trouble by criticizing the Putin-friendly government of Belarus, from outside the country. Interesting.

Excerpt: In a 2013 interview with German television, she said she hoped the international attention would give her “a degree of protection” in Belarus, where press freedom is under constant threat.

Analysis: Ah, yes. The old "freedom of the press" and "human rights" routine.

Excerpt: "The scope and consistency of her project is unique — the sheer number of people whose stories she’s been able to record,” the writer Keith Gessen, who translated her book about Chernobyl into English, said in an email.

Analysis: Keith Gessen (cough-cough) translated one of her books? Gessen? He wouldn't perhaps be related to Masha Gessen -- the militant lesbian author of a best-selling anti-Putin book who openly stated that she wants to abolish the institution of marriage and traditional family? Nah. It's just a coincidence. But just in case, let us Google: 'Keith Gessen'.

Result: Wikipedia: Russian-born American novelist --- Harvard --- Sibling: Masha Gessen

Excerpt: Some see an obvious political message in the Nobel committee’s choice. Ms. Alexievich’s honor arrives at a moment when Russia is once again flexing its military muscles, in Ukraine and in Syria. In choosing Ms. Alexievich, the Swedish committee continued a long tradition of using the award to tweak Soviet and now post-Soviet authority.

Analysis: Bingo! There it is! It's always about politics with the Nobel crowd.

Excerpt: On Thursday, Belarus’s President, Aleksandr G. Lukashenko, who has been a frequent target of Ms. Alexievich’s writing, issued a terse congratulatory note.

Analysis: Double Bingo! The Globalists hate President Lukashenko almost as much as they do President Putin.

Excerpt: At a news conference after her award was announced, Ms. Alexievich pointedly referred to Russia’s actions in Ukraine as “occupation.”

Analysis: "Here's your Nobel Prize -- and your check for $972,000 (here)--- now do your thing, baby!"

Excerpt: The spokesman for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, Dmitri S. Peskov, dismissed Ms. Alexievich’s critique of Russian military aggression. “Apparently, Svetlana just doesn’t have enough information to offer a clear evaluation of what is happening in Ukraine.”

Analysis: Oh we beg to differ on that, Mr. Peskov. Diplomacy may preclude a gentelemen such as yourself from saying so, but not us. This vile villainette, this traitorous tramp, this betraying bitch, has all the information -- as do the greasy Globalists of Nobel, and as do the sleazy scribblers of Sulzberger's Slimes.

*

The Globalist message to the intellectual class of Belarussia, but mainly Russia itself is clear: "If you can somehow get rid of this Putin fellow and rejoin the Cool Kids Club of the West; then fame and fortune will be yours. Just look what we did for that useless hack Svetlana Alexievich!" This anti Putin, anti-Russian obsession is really getting more and more ridiculous by the hour -- and more and more ominous as well.

Boobus Americanus 1: A Belarussian woman was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature.

Boobus Americanus 2: I saw that. She took a shot at Putin during her news conference. Brave woman.

"Bravery hass nothing to do with it, cretin! It wass a frickin' sset up!"

(I'm afraid the conspiracy cat is right again.)

Shagnasty #fundie boards.straightdope.com

in a thread about a guy being executed for transporting drugs in singapore

Singapore wants to run a law enforcement and deterrent experiment that fits in with their culture and goals as well as protects its citizens from a threat up to and including death themselves. I see no problem with that. The guy chose to play the game and lost. The game was completely consensual from the start just like two high school kids playing chicken. Sure, it is a shame when someone dies but you can't really call anyone a victim.

I agree with everything you said Broomstick. I am having a really hard time trying to understand the opposing viewpoint on this one. Singapore doesn't want to kill anyone. They don't want people to courier drugs through or into their country. If someone does, they have to follow through with the promise. This guy was willing to assume the rewards (cash) for a job with a very specific set of risks. The job paid a lot because those risk were there.

People die everyday. This guy is very lucky because he gets to die under circumstances that he conscientiously chose. Most people don't have that luxury.I am having problems with some of the questions thrown around. "Wouldn't you have a problem with an American woman getting executed in the Sudan for consciously engaging in this or that illegal thing?"
Hell, fuck, no. No unless she was wrongfully prosecuted, framed, or illegally coerced. One of the greatest human freedoms is to assume risk for conscience actions up to and including death. Anyone can opt out of that arrangement at any time.
Where is the call for tolerance of other cultures here? Singapore has a very thriving and well established culture. They don't randomly pick people to execute or torture I fail to see the problem. Does the tolerance of other cultures only extend to somewhat Americanized people that like to smoke pot?


Some of the legitimate criticisms of death penalty in the U.S. are that it takes too long and that it is unevenly applied. That makes it a less effective deterrent as well as needlessly expensive. Singapore is a good model in this regard. They institute it in a way that is fair and efficient. We should work to emulate their model. Kooks among us seem to love implementing Asian ideas when it comes to crackpot medicine and other things but draw the line when it comes to effective social and legal measures.

Again, why are so many people bigoted against a prosperous culture that most of their citizens admire and outsiders are never forced to step foot in? You should think about your level of cultural tolerance. You can't just take the superficial fruit-loop parts from around the world and call yourself enlightened. This is the real deal. Bigotry is frowned upon.
...

No, you are missing the point. It doesn't matter that that's the law in Singapore. What matters is that Singapore's law is wrong.

Why is the death penalty "wrong" in this case? If I say it is "right" two times does that cancel out yours? Drug trafficking is wrong on many levels and directly affects other people up to and including death of users and innocents. It is in no way comparable to simply "being" Jewish or anything else. It is an actively chosen and plotted crime with great risks to individuals and societies.

How is the law wrong in your own words? You must be evaluating it according to some external criteria. Is it direct from the word of God or is just part of a quasi-religious humanistic belief? Where did you get this information and how did you process it?

I just look at it like Singapore really doesn't want drugs in their country. That is understandable and it is hardly a victimless crime. People know the consequences and the reason for engaging in it is almost purely financial. I see no problem in opening it up detention, whipping, the death penalty, or live slow dissection if that is what they think is best.

...

Shagnasty, you refute that "societal context" has any relevance to the situation. However, here you admit that alcohol can be a drug with a terrible influence in some people's lives, and then condemn illegal drug dealers.

My "societal context" rebuttal simply means that the harm drug and alcohol addiction causes can't be controlled by overriding social influences nor can its effects be anything other than detrimental in any society. Those are fundamental physiological and psychological processes and they have nothing to do with any society once you get to the point of addiction.

You are correct that the re-legalization of alcohol was probably the best alternative in the U.S. That isn't necessarily true when you talk about crack, the opiates, and meth.

I am a libertarian. That means that I believe in few restrictions on individual freedom and that the ultimate accountability lies with the individual. I was once for the legalization of drugs. However, I sat down one night and tried to come up with a realistic way that this would be implemented. I could not do it. I have come to the conclusion that like, nuclear weapons, a good libertarian can be against the legalization of some things that cause mass harm.

I have yet to hear a workable plan on how the legalization of hard drugs would work at a detailed level. I would love to hear one.

David Yeagley #fundie vdare.com

As an Oklahoma Comanche, I consider myself an "Indian"—an American Indian.

I am not a Native American, nor a First Nations, nor an Aboriginal, and least of all an Indigenous person.

I`m simply a descendent of savage hunters with the most lethal war skills and artful horsemanship known in American history.

I could refer to myself as "nerm" or "num," which, if pronounced half-way correctly, indicates I am of the Comanche people. "Numunu" is what we call ourselves in our own language. But who would know what I`m talking about except Comanches?

White people have called all our tribes "Indians" for over four centuries. And even when they referred to us as Sioux, Comanche, Nes Perce, Coeur d`Alene, most of those names were what some European explorer heard one tribe calling some other tribe.

Few of us are called by our own name in our own language. So what? Names of European countries also get changed quite a bit in other languages: Germans, "Deutscher" are called "Tedeschi" in Italian, for instance. Our Indian peoples are distinguished from one another in historical treaties by the use of these foreign names.

The quest for Ideological Correctness—through terms like Native American, First Nations, Aboriginal, or Indigenous—is ill-fated if not ludicrous. Why swap one European name for another? Why exchange a classy, descriptive French name, such as Coeur d`Alene ("heart of the awl"—indicating able hagglers) for an English derivative of a Latin abstraction like "aboriginal," a vague chronological distinction, or a Spanish derivative like "indigenous," originally meaning poor and naked?

"Indian" is the oldest, most sensible term. When Columbus used the term "Indios" when he wrote to Queen Isabella in 1492 it was because he thought he`d arrived on the western shores of India. What else would he call the people he encountered in the world new to him?

Columbus used no such phrase as "una gente en Dios," as modern revisionists like to say. These contortionists propagate this myth to suggest that we are spiritually superior beings, so impressive that Columbus called us "a people in God." But what he called us was "naked as when their mothers bore them."

That term "Native American," like so many things, appeared for the first time in the 1960s, as part of the legal definition of who is considered an American Indian. It involved land squabbles, of course, and the stakes have always been high. When other groups wanted in on the definition through the term "Native American," many "American Indians" objected strongly, to the agreement of some responsible scholars.

In general, however, academic trends list with the social winds. Name-changing, as other university fads, is generally the work of Marxist racial agitators, ever anxious to overturn "the establishment" as a means of clutching at power. Changing the names of things, usurping their meaning, or removing names entirely, are favorite tactics of these leftists. Thus "Negro" became "Colored," then "Black," then "Afro-American" and now "African American."

But then American states, counties, rivers, schools and teams weren`t generally named after Negroes, so that particular name game had its limits. Indian names are the next target. And that name game is just beginning.

But count me out. Don`t call me Native. Call me Savage, Redskin, Injun, Comanche, Red Devil. Don`t worry about being sued. You can`t victimize me with names. I`m not black, I`m red.

"Indian" is what Americans have always called us, and it is the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant with whom we have had mostly to do. The victory was his, not the Negro`s, the Hispanic`s, the Communist`s, or the Arab Muslim`s. Why should I care what they call me?

By the way, I am thinking of suing a certain Michael Weiner—for renaming himself with my honorable, sacred name, Savage!

JonFreeman #racist #wingnut deviantart.com

You own a store.

You're making do.

Then an angry mob chanting "I CAN'T BREATH! JUSTICE FOR ALL! BLACK LIVES MATTER! THEY'LL LISTEN TO US NOW" busts down your windows and door and steals every goddamned thing.

Then you see a fucking asshole online say "OHHHHH, IT'S ONLY PROPERTY. INSURANCE WILL COVER IT! BESIDES, THAT STORE OWNER IS WEALTHY AND I'M A VICTIM OF SOCIETY! PROPERTY ISN'T AS VALUABLE AS HUMAN LIFE" ... and you're reading this as you're looking at the now empty shelves ... representing thousands of dollars (if not hundreds of thousands, as is the case of jewelry stores) of stolen inventory that the insurance won't cover (if you're lucky, they'll reimburse you several months down the line ... after you've closed up shop since you can't make rent since you don't have anything to sell or any money to buy new inventory with)...

Do you really think you (as the shopkeep) is gonna be complacent and say "OH, THOSE PEACEFUL PROTESTERS. THEY SURE DID PROVE THEIR POINT. I REALLY DON'T HAVE A RIGHT TO COMPLAIN ABOUT IT, ESPECIALLY SINCE I'M NOT BLACK."

Or ... are you gonna skip town and move to a city where the locals don't burn down their own community every time they get upset?

Don't kid yourself, the rioter holding the baseball bat and stolen goods would change their tune instantly if it was their shit getting stolen. And the armchair NPC activist would also change their tune in an instant if their goods were pillaged in these riots.

Besides, with new autopsy report shows he had corona and fentynol in his system possibly shading it more to reckless manslaughter as opposed to 1st degree murder ... well, violent riots targeting citizens are never justifiable, and now it's possible you're going to have a good portion of america eating their words and saying "THE FACTS WERE WRONG, BUT OUR MESSAGE WAS RIGHT" as cities continue to burn.

Peaceful protests, yeah sure knock yourself out. But every time BLM rears its head, looting happens, with or without the help of antifa. It's not a coincidence at this point, it's tradition.

Got Questions ministries #fundie gotquestions.org

Question: "If I convert to Christianity, my family will disown me, and I will be persecuted. Should I follow Jesus?"

Answer: Converting to Christianity means becoming a follower of Jesus by faith (John 10:26-30). Crowds flocked to Jesus, but most were not His true followers. They just wanted to experience healing of their diseases, see Jesus cast out demons, and eat their fill of the bread He miraculously provided. Jesus warned them of the cost of following Him.

“Then he called the crowd to him along with his disciples and said: ‘If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it. What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul? If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father’s glory with the holy angels’” (Mark 8:34-38).

Would you follow your own fleshly desires, or would you deny yourself and follow Jesus? Do you value your earthly life or eternal life? Do you treasure the goods of this world or the salvation of your soul? Do you fear being ashamed of Jesus or fear Jesus being ashamed of you?

You pursue what you treasure. You go to work and sweat because you know the rewards of a paycheck outweigh the temporary pleasure of reclining at home in front of the T.V. If Jesus calls you, you will follow, knowing that losing your earthly life is worth gaining eternal life.

Would you follow Jesus? Count the cost (Luke 14:25-33):

• Following Jesus costs your own life. Jesus said you must deny yourself, taking up your cross. One who rejects the cross cannot be Christ’s disciple (Luke 14:27).

• Following Jesus may cost the loss of family and friends. Jesus said His coming often brings division between His followers and their families, friends, and the world. Anyone who does not hate (meaning love less) his family is not worthy of Christ (Matthew 10:32-39).

• Following Jesus may cost the loss of your possessions. One rich man proudly thought he was good enough to go to heaven. “Jesus said to him, ‘If you wish to be complete, go and sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me’” (Matthew 19:21). Loving wealth more, the rich man sadly forsook Jesus.

• Following Jesus will cost facing persecution. Christians should expect suffering as a normal part of belonging to the “man of sorrows” (See Isaiah 53 and John 15:18-21). Jesus even called the persecuted one “blessed,” saying “rejoice and be glad for your reward in heaven is great” (See Matthew 5:10-12).

God’s people have always faced persecution. The prophets were reviled, tortured, and killed (Hebrews 11:37). History records that ten of Jesus’ disciples were executed for preaching Christ. Tradition states that Peter insisted on being crucified upside down because he counted himself unworthy to die in the same manner as his Lord. Yet he wrote, “If you are reviled for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of God and of glory rests on you” (1 Peter 4:14). The apostle Paul was jailed, beaten, shipwrecked, and stoned numerous times for preaching Christ, but he considered suffering not even worth mentioning compared to the reward he knew awaited in paradise (Romans 8:18).

Following Jesus doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll lose your possessions, family, friends, and physical life, but are you willing?

While the cost of discipleship seems high, persecution brings earthly and heavenly rewards. Through persecution, the Lord stays with believers (Matthew 28:20; Hebrews 13:5); He knows their limits and gives grace (1 Corinthians 10:13; 2 Corinthians 12:9); He rewards them in heaven (Matthew 5:10-12); He works persecution for good, shaping the believer’s character and glorifying Himself (Romans 8:28). The rewards far outweigh the cost of following Jesus!

Jesus suffered and died on the cross to take the believer’s punishment for sin. The only way of forgiveness and eternal life is through faith in the Lord Jesus (Ephesians 2:8-9). Although a Christian’s enduring persecution does not add any saving merit to the perfect work of Christ, a true believer will faithfully follow Jesus through suffering.

Firlewanger #fundie flashlyrics.com

[Lyrics of "Things I Remember"]

When I sit in the grass in the summer
Birds are singing songs in the trees
I see White children playing games in the sun
And it seems so peaceful and free
It reminds me of the old days
When everything was different and right
When our people were stuck together
And were proud to be White

This is things that I remember
Things that goes right into my heart
This is things that I remember
That's why I want a race-apart

It was a time when people marched our streets
With their flags flying in the wind
They were marching for our race and nation
Singing song they were proud to sing

Then the communist began to take over
And to destroy all our national pride
And when they put their flag in Berlin
It was then Europe began to die
When I sit here on my own
And I think about what we had
It is like a stone right in my heart
And I feel so bad
Our once great Europe
Has been knocked down to the ground
Our once great Europe
Has begun to die

Ronald E. Williams #sexist gotothebible.com

If our great-grandmothers would arrive at a modern Christian school girls' basketball game, they would recoil in the horror as they would watch physically developed girls running around in brief outfits that expose their thighs and bouncing bosoms to the lustful eyes of any man wishing to look. Moreover, they would be shocked as they would see girls trying to "kill the opponent," yell, scream, fight, and in general, act in every way like a man.
Whatever happened to girls who studied to have a servant spirit and to be quiet, meek, demure, and shame faced? How are we training our girls to be meek, quiet, and submissive wives by encouraging them to "win at all costs," knock over your opponent if necessary, be loud, froward, and physical, while being dressed immodestly and while acting in a very masculine manner? Just because the world encourages these qualities in their daughters, must God's people do the same? Is it any wonder many girls from Christian backgrounds consider motherhood and being a housewife as being unfulfilling, a bore, unexciting, and beneath their dignity.

Moreover, many of these sports heroines have developed such boldness and forwardness from their sports activities, that they disdain the traditional and Biblical role of women. To such a girl, the Biblical mandate to be in submission to her husband and to even reverence him (Ephesians 5:24, 33) is outdated and unrealistic. She instead finds the raucous demands of "feminists" and the women's liberation crowd more to be her liking. After all, marriage is a 50/50 proposition is it not? She thinks to herself " I have just as much say around here as he does don't I?"

When such a girl marries, she is so quick and eager to establish "fairness" in her marriage, that she finds her marriage ending up in frustration, disillusionment and divorce.

KerimF #fundie atheistforums.org

As you said, Jesus message is surely not for all humans as it is not for other living things in the world.

As you know, even those who call themselves, for one reason or another, Christians (mainly the privileged ones) cannot, even if they want to, take seriously, speaking practically, most of what Jesus says (as written on the today's Gospel).

After all, those who have (are born with) a human living flesh only don't need, on these days, hearing any message from the Will/Power that forced them to exist in the time/space realm, we call life. They are already guided to play their various roles in life by instructions embedded in their living cells that are inherited while being evolved since millions of years and not necessarily on earth only. In other words, the continuity of life on earth and its progress is served by all living things, including most humans, the way they are instructed to do (instincts for example).

But it happens that not all humans on earth are born of flesh only. So living to serve the world, in wars (destroying) and peace (building), is not necessarily a priority to all humans. And it is natural that you, for example, are confused about the reason for which a person may live the unconditional love and care towards all others, friends and enemies. The reason, in this case, is surely not to avoid a punishment or to get a reward afterlife.

Padraig Martin #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "The GOP is Not for Me"]

It is time to face a tough fact: the South has no political home in the United States of America. The Democratic Party long since abandoned the South. Its strategy is clearly aligned with (largely urban) minority constituents, sexual degenerates from across the LGBT+ spectrum, and Marxist indoctrinated cat moms. However, the Republican Party was supposed to be the conservative option. It was the retooling of a Dixiecrat bloc that shared some traditionalist ideological camaraderie with Yankee elites. That was a happy fantasy that has long since died.

Today, as monuments are torn down, our heritage is vilified, and politicians race to out-virtue signal each other on the backs of our deceased kin, the Republican Party – from Trump down – has proven that the South is on her own. It is time to walk away from that party. It is time to show those within the party that our loyalty to them comes with a price: loyalty to us.

Since the Republican Party has broken its agreement with the South, no self-respecting Southerner should vote Republican.

I am not suggesting you vote Democrat. They are in full-blown Bolshevik mode. I am suggesting you do not vote for any of them – period. Walk away.

For a long time, I have believed that the best path forward is a free and independent South. The South is the last Godly Nation-State in the West. Her people are overwhelmingly Christian. Her people have a rich heritage that is distinct from the rest of the United States. Much of that heritage – for good and bad – is often tied to a war for her own independence in the mid-19th Century and the post-war oppression of Reconstruction. These unique attributes and cultural idiosyncrasies define a unique ethnicity.

Southerners are not generically “American,” Southerners are Southerners.

The Irish Nationalist in me recognizes these beautiful people for what they are – a people worthy of her own destiny. She deserves better from a country to which she has given a disproportionate amount of her native sons to the beaches of the Pacific, the jungles of Vietnam, and the mountains of Afghanistan. Now, as monuments to her departed kin are defiled and destroyed, she deserves protection from the one voice to whom she empowered to be her protector through the vote: the Republican Party.

And how has the GOP honored the South’s unwavering commitment to the party? Silence – at best.

The recent riots throughout the United States, perpetrated by Bolshevik extremists and antifa terrorists, are an indication that the country is lost forever. It is hard to imagine that anyone can re-piece this jigsaw puzzle together.

[...]

Instead, we got Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott groveling to the family of a man who was robbing a pregnant woman weeks before he was killed. A Republican Senate that has its majority because of the South, just voted to rename historic bases that honored Southern heroes on Southern properties. We have a Georgia House Speaker, Republican David Ralston, is now spearheading “hate crime” legislation that would effectively make it illegal to voice an unpopular opinion. The list of anti-Southern actions by Republicans grows daily.

At almost every turn, Republicans are betraying the very Southern voters who put them in power – all to placate a mob of violent radicals in the hopes that they may be able to hold onto approximately 10% of the Black vote in future elections.

[...]

I still believe Southern independence can be achieved through a peaceful separation of states – but not with the GOP as the vehicle to implement that change. Conservative, Godly legislation throughout the South on matters such as religious liberty, abortion, and pre-pubescent transgenderism would stand in such stark contrast to that of ungodly, leftist degeneracy in the North and West. Such a stark contrast would eventually force an amicable divorce. Even Bill Maher seemed to agree.

[...]

Do I believe the Left will take advantage of such an opportunity if we gift them a super majority? Yes, I do. Might some believe I am a political accelerationist? Probably, but images throughout the country indicate accelerationism is already here, and the GOP has done absolutely nothing to stop the country from being destroyed by antifa terrorism or state sanctioned anarcho-tyranny. In such an environment, I would rather we face the devil in front of us than the one stabbing us in the back. And the Republican Party stabs us in the back at every turn.

Kajm, Maxm2317, GalvaEmperor, Graeystone, Dagur-Berserker, LipsterLeo, TranquilityBass, and The-Darkwolf #wingnut deviantart.com

(submitter note: its’ Kajm again and his little group of fellow far-right trump loving circle jerkers)

[Kajm’s Journal]
'Impeachment' was a foregone conclusion. They've wanted it since the day he was elected- BECAUSE he was elected, and nothing else.

And now I understand they are stalling on sending it to the Senate and I will tell you why: The Senate will KILL it. There is ZERO chance of it going any further. And that means, the Democrats would be forced to focus upon actually DOING the work they are supposed to be doing, for the American people. Which means MORE WINNING for Trump.

They can't have this. They NEED to keep Trump's 'guilt' in the public eye, right up to the next election. They need people to BELIEVE that there is nothing Legitimate about Trump's presidency.

And that all GOES AWAY if they can't keep 'investigating' and calling witnesses who never saw anything but 'believe' the President acted (pick a crime! ANNNNNNNY crime!).

They are never going to stop. And presenting this to the Senate, is going to punch a massive hole in their narrative, when it FAILS on contact.

(Submitter notes: the comments, let the circle jerk begin!)
Maxm2317: Their narrative will wither up and die faster than any other piece of Democrat legislation that has gone into, as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer so often calls it, “Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s Legislative Graveyard.”

Kajm: And Thank God he's buried them.

GalvaEmperor: I hope so. We have very few wins to our name; losing Trump means the left will never stop ruining our lives,
We are dark times my friend

(argument between two users, leading to this)

Dagur-Berserker: False victim narrative? That's what you leftists play all the time about non-white people when you constantly excuse the crime they commit. There isn't even any evidence against Trump. You obviously don't know anything about American politics. All the democrats ever do is attack America.

Greatkingrat88: I'm not even a leftist, dude. I just hate Trump.

Dagur-Berserker: But you've yet to prove that he's done anything wrong.

Graeystone: If anyone thinks this will just stop with just Trump if he somehow magically gets fully impeached had better guess again. VP Pence's head is also on the democrat's chopping block. Line of succession if POTUS can no longer fulfill duties as president-
1) Vice President
2) Speaker of the House of Representative.
Don't like throwing around the C and T words but this does make me wonder what the democrats are actually up to.

LipsterLeo: The Democrats are actually into overthrowing the "racist, unfair" constitution, and throwing America into chaos. They believe, as Marx taught, that out of the ashes, they can build their utopia. Got news for 'em. Me, and 100 million other Americans, are armed and will not be disarmed.

Graeystone: The democrat party was the party that kept slavery going right from the start. When they started to think slavery was going to be gotten rid of, they basically triggered a Civil War. They founded the KKK. They wrote and passed the Jim Crow laws along with all the other 'legalized segregation/discrimination laws'.
As far as an Utopia goes, that is outright impossible. While its possible to imagine a perfect system it is impossible to bring one about because of humanity's imperfect nature. Imperfect people cannot create a perfect system.
Its like the democrats can never accept a good idea and if they do it will only truly benefit them and nobody else.

TranquilityBass: The House is meant to be the place of passion and rhetoric, thus the two year terms. The Senate is meant to be where the grownups live and can take long-term perspectives, thus the six year terms.
Of course, as that one doofus from Texas said, "We can impeach him more than once!" This may be necessary for the Democrats' survival, since wasting time in the House stops good work from being done for the American people. For instance, we currently have the lowest black unemployment ever recorded--but the party of the KKK, of Jim Crow, and of Lester Maddox wants to remove the president who made it so.

The-Darkwolf: Meanwhile Hillary walked away from Criminal negligence violating National Security ("I'm just a girl so I don't get all this technical stuff, but I am WOMAN so you owe me the Presidency!") Obama handed over tens of thousands of military-grade weapons to Narcos, ISIS and other terrorists ("It seemed like a good idea at the time, but I still stand for gun control!") and the collective hive-mind of 70-plus presidential candidates from the party all agree on ending the democratic process of the electoral college so that only Sanctuary Cities will matter during national elections....
The quote I love most was Clinton's campaign manager during the 2016 election finally admitting that America was socially, culturally and politically more divided than at any time since the Civil War... "But it's all the Republican's fault!".... maybe Nancy Pelosi could just order the FBI to open fire on Fort Sumpter and just get on with the inevitable... :shrug:
You gotta understand, I am not a huge Trump fan but at least he's managed to pull up the economy, unemployment is at an major low, based on full-time jobs, not part-time mcjobs and the biggest winners are young African-Americans, and he's pulling the US out of a foreign boondoggle without a hope of resolution. And apparently his great criminal act was to tell a foreign power that he was okay with their already on-going investigation into espionage involving the Democratic presidential frontrunner.....

Prof. James Petras #conspiracy globalresearch.ca

he malady, common among political leaders who commit heartless crimes while craving popular adulation as heroes and misunderstood saints, is ‘Political Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy’ (PMSP).

PMSP best explains the pathologic drive of politicians and policy makers who inflict relentless, systematic mass destruction and then intervene in a most theatrical manner to save a few victims – thus drawing gratitude from the victim and public support for their ‘humanitarian intervention’ – ignorant of their fundamental role in creating the mayhem in the first place.

The actions of the outgoing President Barack Obama in the last three days of his administration present an example of PMSP on the domestic front.

Throughout his eight years as President of the United States , Obama exhibited many symptoms of PMSP – both abroad and in the US . For his cynical crimes, he was awarded the ‘Nobel Peace Prize’ among other honors.

PMSP – The Abuser as Savior

Each of Obama’s relentless military interventions, including Libya , Somalia , Yemen , Iraq , Afghanistan and especially Syria , were characterized by the deliberate and total destruction of the means of normal civilized social existence for defenseless civilians – the bombing of homes, factories, markets, weddings, funerals, schools, hospitals – leading to the deaths of many thousands and the uprooting of millions into desperate flight. In each case, Obama would proclaim that he was saving the victims from imminent genocide by an abusive ruler or ethnic group. He would rush in to provide a few baskets of relief and a few blankets to some bedraggled survivors of his own bombing campaigns and bask in the glowing praise of mass media propagandists and fellow imperialists. Choreographed applause and adulation would seem to follow America ’s First Black Presidenteverywhere.

Obama’s bombs, arms and mercenaries drove hundreds of thousands of families into the streets, into the mountains and most horrifically onto rickety, overloaded boats on the seas. In each series of destruction and chaos, he would calculate the point at which his ‘humanitarian intervention’ would most effectively reflect on his heroism.

He destroyed the entire nation of Libya, shredded its institutions and infrastructure, bombed its cities and villages, even deliberately sending a deadly missile into the home sheltering a half dozen of President Muammar Gadaffi’s small grandchildren and finally ended up with the public death by torture of the wounded Libyan president sodomized by stakes documented in a imperial-pornographic snuff film that should have revolted the entire world. That the main victims of Obama’s ‘liberation of Libya ’ were hundreds of thousands of black Libyan citizens and sub-Saharan African workers did little to detract from his public persona as the first ‘African American’ world hero. The capsized boatloads of fleeing black Libyans and the bloated bodies washing ashore on the beaches of Spain and Italy were never linked to the criminal policies of our Nobel Prize recipient! He even urged Europe to accept the miserable refugees fleeing his war – in a gesture of supreme PMSP. He could do no wrong. This serial political killer had an unquenchable thirst for sympathy and admiration – and a wholly corrupt propaganda machine to polish his halo.

Andrew Hallinan #racist reuters.com

A Florida gun store that proclaimed itself a Muslim-free zone was sued on Wednesday in federal court by the state chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations on the grounds that the restriction is discriminatory.

The lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Fort Lauderdale accuses Florida Gun Supply of Inverness of violating the federal public accommodations law and seeks an injunction to stop the discrimination, according to the complaint.

"We just can’t let segregation rear its ugly head in Florida again. This is part of Islamophobia that we need to challenge," said Hassan Shibly, chief executive director of the civil rights group.

Andrew Hallinan, the gun shop's 28-year-old owner, referred calls for comment to his lawyer, Robert Muise of the American Freedom Law Center. The law firm aggressively seeks to advance and defend the country’s Judeo-Christian heritage, according to its website.

Muise denied that the store had discriminated and called the lawsuit “absolutely bogus.”

Hallinan announced the Muslim-free zone in a video posted on his store’s Facebook page on July 18 in reaction to the deadly shootings at Tennessee military sites by a suspect officials have described as a homegrown extremist.

In a telephone call with Shibly, Hallinan invited him to attend a gun course at his store on July 25 and explain the Koran to him afterward.

Shibly said Hallinan subsequently canceled the meeting.

Galaxygirl #conspiracy rr-bb.com

Masonic Teachings?

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...efreemason.htm

Kenneth Copeland chants the words "I AM" which is a Masonic initiation term.
"And I say this with all respect, so that it don't upset you too bad. But I say it anyway: When I read in the Bible where He says, "I AM," I just smile and say, "Yes, I AM, too." Believers Voice of Victory broadcast July 9 1987
During the ceremonies of the Masonic ritual for the Royal Arch degree, the candidate is asked, "Brother Inspector, what are you?" and he replies, "I AM THAT I AM."
When Jesus told the jews before Abraham was "I AM" he was claming to be the God of Moses who went by that name. This is why they tried to kill him immediately. Kenneth is claiming to be a God.

33rd Degree Freemason Robert Schuller also endorses his followers to chant "I AM"
"The most effective mantras employ the "M" sound. You can get the feel of it by repeating the words, "I am, I am," many times over.... Transendental Meditation or TM... is not a religion nor is it necessarily anti-Christian."
Peace of Mind Through Possibility Thinking, pp. 131-32

Benny Hinn whom I suspect is a Freemason, also tells Christians to chant "I AM."
"Don't tell me you have Jesus. You are everything He was and everything He is and ever shall be.....Don't say, 'I have.' Say , 'I AM, I AM, I AM, I AM, I AM.' Our Position in Christ #2-The Word Made Flesh audiotape Side 2 1991

Kenneth Copeland has stated that Jehovah means Half Male/ Half Female and that God is as much female as he is male.
He amplifies this strange teaching by also saying that Adam was originally half male and half female.
According to the book "The Secret Teachings Of Freemasonry" by Gordon Mohr this is exactly what the Masonic Lodge teaches:- (on pages 107-108)

In his first initiation stages he (the Freemason) learns: 1 - That the rite of initation for Apprentice Masons represents in dramatic fashion the origin or birth of Nature's god - the Great All. It signifies the non-existence of a supernatural person God, such as that of Christianity. It signifies that the two principles of "matter" and "form", "male" and "female," are always eternally generating," (reproducing). It looks on God as a hermaphrodite, and creation as the beginning of the "generation process." Taken from: Speculative Masonry, by Brother J. Yorke, Grand Master of the Ancient Rite pages 3 & 54

2 - The initation rite into the Second Degree, represents the moral condition of nature's god, always in labor, always reproducing. Again it looks on God as hermaphroditic, and states that his name JEHOVAH, means "generation." Meaning to say, HE-SHE, the two sexes in one. From Speculative Masonry page 14 & Mackey's Lexion pages 126-129

The dual principle of "male" and "female" is represented by the "square and compass." The "compass" represents OSIRIS, the male god of the Egyptians, while the "square" is the symbol representing ISIS, the female goddess of Egypt - both are sexual symbols. Taken from: Ragon's Cours. Philosophique page 102
This reference to the square and compass is significant as Copeland has placed these symbols on one of his tape covers.
Copeland teaches similar things that the early Mormons leaders who were also Freemasons taught.
While the Mormons teach that God lives on a planet near the star Kolob, Copeland says that his hermaphroditic god also lives on a Mother Planet:-

"Heaven has a north and a south and an east and a west. Consequently, it must be a planet."
Spirit, Soul and Body I 1985 audiotape #01-0601, side 1

"You don't think earth was first, do you? Huh? Well, you don't think that God made man in His image, and then made earth in some other image? There is not anything under this whole sun that's new. Are you hearing what I'm saying? This is all a copy. It's a copy of home. It's a copy of the Mother Planet. Where God lives, He made a little one just like His and put us on it." Following the Faith of Abraham I, 1989 audiotape #01-3001, side 1

Compare what Freemason-Mormon Brigham Young stated "Adam is our father and our God" with Copeland's quote:-
"Adam, in the Garden of Eden, was God manifested in the flesh."
Following the Faith of Abraham I, side 1

Also compare Freemason-Mormon founder Joseph Smith's teaching that if you were to see God today "you would see him like a man in form - like yourselves in all the person, image, and very form as a man." with Copeland's following description of his god:-

Copeland decribes God as "a being that is very uncanny the way he's very much like you and me. A being that stands somewhere around 6'2", 6'3", that weighs somewhere in the neighbourhood of a couple of hundred pounds or a little better, has a span of 9 inches across." Spirit, Soul and Body I audiotape Side 1 1985

God spoke Adam into existence in authority with words. These words struck Adam's body in the face. His body and God were exactly the same size."
Holy Bible, Kenneth Copeland Reference Edition 1991, 45, emphasis in original

"[Adam] was the copy, looked just like [God]. If you stood Adam upside God, they look exactly alike. If you stood Jesus and Adam side by side, they would look and sound exactly alike."
Authority of the Believer IV 1987, audiotape #01-0304, side 1
On the cover for Copeland's audiotape series entitled 'How To Build Your Firm Foundation.' Remember the main definition of Masonry as being 'Freemasonry is a peculiar system of Morality, veiled in Allegory, and illustrated by Symbols.'
This is exactly what we have right here. Copeland has placed the chief Masonic symbols of the square and compass here that to most people the true meaning is veiled in an allegorical style.

ALLEGORY, fictional literary narrative or artistic expression that conveys a symbolic meaning parallel to but distinct from, and more important than, the literal meaning. Allegory has also been defined as an extended metaphor. The symbolic meaning is usually expressed through personifications and other symbols. In art, an allegorical painting or sculpture is one that has a symbolic meaning underlying the surface image.

More symbols of Freemasonry are incorporated into Copeland's 'Shout' magazine for kids. Around Kenneth's neck is an eagle above an inverted triangle. I have seen this symbol on a Masonic certificate before. The female has an inverted 5 pointed star placed on her shirt. This symbol represents the 'Order of the Eastern Star' which is a Masonic order for women! Is this a coincidence? Now Copeland has placed the main symbols of Masonry and the Eastern Star on his covers. When 33rd Degree Freemason Robert Schuller wanted to express his secret membership in the Lodge he used the 33rd Degree symbol of a double headed eagle and sent it out to many people without them realizing what he was declaring to his Masonic brothers worldwide. 33rd Degree Freemason Oral Roberts used the inverted triangle in his University logo which has a hidden Masonic design to it. Another odd element is that the Freemasons veiled the symbols of the square, compass, inverted star and triangle into the street layout of Washington D.C. These are the 3 symbols that Copeland has placed on the 2 mentioned covers. As I write this he is also presently in Washington conducting a rally.

To summarize:-
Kenneth Copeland started work under a 33rd Degree Freemason whom he has a strong friendship with. He claims to be 'I AM' which is a Masonic initiation term. His teaching about his hermaphroditic god match up exactly with what Masonry teaches and his teaching on the size and likeness of God match up with what the early Freemason-Mormon leaders also taught. Add to this the veiled symbols of Freemasonry that he has placed on 2 covers, possibly more.

I would have never suspected Copeland of being a Freemason if it were not for his heretical teachings including his belief that God was gang raped and sodomised by homosexual Roman soldiers. If so then God's blood would be impure and unable to redeem. Please click on the link below for more information on Copeland's false teachings and strange beliefs.

The deciding factor to publish this information came after a friend of mine received information from an ex-Mason that stated that he has been in attendance in Masonic meeting when Copeland was present. At the moment this man wishes not to reveal himself. He possibly has some firm documented evidence that we will try to obtain. I do not know who this man is but my friend is trying to obtain more information. Another thing that helped verify these facts is a research project in the US that has gained some proof of these allegations. I am currently trying to contact these men so I can add their research to this page. What I do know is that they are both 'Born-again' Christian ministers whose credentials have been checked out. I will amplify on these details later.

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

Calvinism in New England was scorned by the heresy of Unitarianism, which deemed itself holier, but Unitarianism only lasted about a generation before it collapsed into Emersonian subjectivist Transcendentalism, which then swiftly (in less than a generation) collapsed into politics (abolition, feminism etc).

If we look at the New Testament position on slavery it is of course passivist and pacifist. Christians are encouraged, but not required, to free their slaves. Slaves are discouraged from rebelling and running away. Masters are required to be benevolent.

What happened when many Christian Churches adopted an activist position on slavery, a clearly heretical position on slavery?

An activist position on slavery requires war. War requires dreadful means, requires lies, terror, murder, and artificial famine – all in an undeniably good cause, of course.

Lo and behold, those churches that adopted an activist position against slavery ceased to be Christian. So that heresy, quite predictably, turned deadly.

But, once anti slavery became the law of the land, then a good Christian should of course support that law, so anti slavery did not destroy Christianity.

But now, however pretty much all Churches, have adopted the modern marriage vows, implying a clearly heretical position on marriage, which vows undermine and disrupt marriage, which in turn results in preaching that is fundamentally hostile to marriage as a binding contract.

Equality requires fences, that is to say, requires the dissolution of marriage. An actually functioning marriage is always patriarchal. Show me a man who picks up fifty percent of the socks, and I will show you a man who sleeps on the couch, while once a week or so his wife’s lover drops in to rough her up and take her money.

A genuinely Christian Church can no more support modern marriage, than it could support holy war on slavery. In so doing, is necessarily holier than Jesus, and so, runs through unitarianism to vagueness to leftism, and the Church building is remodeled to become a left wing bookstore.

The modern position on wedding vows is leading to pretty much the same consequences as the activist position on slavery did.

Mike King #racist #wingnut realhistorychannel.org

In both books as well as in the web-pages of The Anti-New York Times, we have exposed enough dirt on that evil and nasty son-of-a-bitch Lyndon Baines Johnson to surely rank him down there with Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Demono Rosenfeld and Barack Obongo as one of America's most destructive presidents. Now, from a book review in Sulzberger's Slimes, of all places, we learn something new about LBJ. Evidently, the corrupt bastard stole his Senate seat (Texas) in 1948, and, in later years, openly joked about it.

From the article:

"In “The Path to Power,” Volume I of his monumental biography, “The Years of Lyndon Johnson,” Robert A. Caro ignited a blowtorch whose bright flame both illuminated Johnson’s early career and badly seared his reputation. In Volume II, “Means of Ascent,” Mr. Caro intensifies his flame to a brilliant blue point.

With it he burns into the reader’s imagination the story of the election in 1948 for junior United States Senator from Texas, and how Lyndon Johnson, in Mr. Caro’s words, “stole it — and in the stealing violated even the notably loose boundaries of Texas politics.” In the process, Mr. Caro defaces Johnson’s image irreparably.

Johnson is painted so satanically dark against the angelic brightness of Coke Stevenson (LBJ's opponent) that you inevitably find yourself thinking of Macbeth."

Now why didn't the Jew York Slimes warn the American electorate about the career-long corruption of this election-stealing Demonrat scumbag when he - after just 6 years in the U.S. Senate -- became the Senate Majority Leader following the mid-term elections of 1954? Or when he was forced upon JFK as his VP running mate in 1960? Or when he assumed the presidency after JFK's assassination in 1963? Or when he stood for election on his own in 1964? Hmmm?

The criminal record of this beastly, bullying, ambitious, Zionist-connected arch-villain of American history and the permanent damage which his destructive polices continue to inflict upon us cannot be understated. Let's have a look at LBJ's litany of infamy -- or "rap sheet"-- which followed the stolen election of 1948.

1954: As Senate Minority Leader, conspired with President Eisenhower to kill Joe McCarthy's investigation into the Communist penetration of the U.S. government
1954: As Senator, sponsored the law which led to the still-in-place political-speech restrictions placed on tax-exempt organizations and churches (though the law is only enforced against conservative preachers!)
1963: As Vice President, conspired in the assassination plot which killed President John F. Kennedy and made LBJ President -- and later covered it up by assembling (through intimidation) the "Warren Commission"
1964: Signed the "Food Stamp Act" into law -- thus greatly expanding the welfare state and encouraging fatherless families
1964: Involved the U.S. in a war with North Vietnam on the basis of the Tonkin Gulf false-flag hoax. This led to the drafting of young men to fight and die in Vietnam
1964: Signed the "Civil Rights Act" into law -- thus laying the foundation for legalized and mandated discrimination against White people in hiring, promoting, college acceptance etc.
1965: Signed the "Voting Rights Act" into law, thus guaranteeing the "right" of any functional illiterate or actual moron to participate in bloc-voting for Demonrats
1965: Signed the "Immigration Act" into law, a law which deliberately altered the long-term demographics of America so that Whites could be out-voted by media-manipulated immigrants from the Turd World
1965: (Social Security Act Amendment) Signed the expensive Medicare pyramid scheme into law at a time when most of the elderly already had good and affordable health care
1965: (Social Security Act Amendment) Signed the expensive Medicaid into law -- thus greatly expanding the welfare state and encouraging fatherless families
1967: Allowed the Israelis to murderous attack the U.S.S. Liberty in what was supposed to have been a false flag sinking of the ship blamed on Egypt -- Johnson -- with the protection of Fake News -- later covered up the truth about the attack which left 37 U.S. sailors dead and 171 wounded

What a record of madness and mayhem, eh? And it all started with a stolen election in 1948, which the Slimes -- when it no longer matters and no one cares -- has only just now deemed "fit to print."

Boobus Americanus 1: I read a book review in The New York Times today about how Lyndon Johnson stole his Senate seat in Texas.
Boobus Americanus 2: I don't know too much about LBJ's presidency. He's not talked about that much.

*

St. Sugar: Boobuss, you don't know much about anything cuss your a frickin' normie!
Editor: LBJ's tyrannical reign of ruin changed the course of American history -- for the worse -- on a scale matched only by Wilson and FDR.

supersport #fundie christiandiscussionforums.org

After debating Satan for several months I’ve come to some conclusions. And my conclusions come with a heavy heart. I have always believed in a world where the good guys win and the bad guys lose. I’ve always believed that good will prevail over evil.

But the more I debate here, the more I’m begining to realize there’s a wicked undercurrent I’m swimming against. There’s a ferocious enemy lurking below the surface that I cant quite put my finger on. And I’m realizing that I cannot overcome what I do not understand. And it’s not merely a non-belief in God or a happy-go-lucky free-thinker individual that I’m up against..…it’s a much more sinister entity than the innocent disbelief that’s portrayed here.

Unlike Christ, who sacrificed himself for others’ everlasting life, Satan -- like the piece of garbage that he is -- sacrifices other people for everlasting death. And unlike the Bible, which says human beings are made in the image of God, Satan says we are made in the image of of him -- a carnal beast, and our lives should procede according to his particular appetite -- where savagery, murder, rape and death is natural and to be expected and promoted. Meanwhile life and love and worship of God should be eliminated.

How can one debate this mindset? I’m finding that I can’t do it.

And the weird thing is, I’m not at all convinced that Satan actually believes in the sorry theory he so eagerly promotes. He doesn’t necessarily believe in random mutations – he doesn’t have any real faith in Natural Selection – and he doesn’t truly believe in adaptive radiation. (When’s the last time Satan made a post on here PROMOTING the validity of these things?).….instead these are merely his tools that are being used to decieve and convince others.

Ulimately, Satan believes in anything that will point others away from the notion that God Created the world. Truth is not what his goal is – his goal is deception. And he will use any tool of deception that will steer people away from Christ. He’s obsessed with making people lose their faith because he loves the notion that people will be spending their eternities with him as a melted corpse, scorched inside his torture chamber down in hell. This is why Satan invades so many Christian forums with vigor – simply to throw a wrecking ball into people’s spiritual lives. There is no other explanation!

Teharile #conspiracy givemegossip.com

like Kate Middleton has too but hers isn't healed yet . the brain patterns of a healed ET brain construct are shown as the outer leaves on the UN flag and that gap between the leaves symbolizes our healed head wound . the human brain constructs brain patterns , including that single birth halo pattern you lost , are on the map section of the UN flag along with the lower brain patterns . the toxins and superstitions lower your birth halo to that side to side fallen angel type pattern you also see on the map section of the UN flag . after you humans lose the halo , and get knocked back down to the side to side pattern , the other patterns shown on the map section are what you go back through to get back that halo .

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

Harvey Weinstein (cough cough), is one of the moguliest of moguls in the history of Hollyweird. For decades, his credentials, rap-sheet protected him from long-whispered allegations of running a "casting couch" for ambitious young starlets looking for their big break, or just hoping to survive in Perverttown.

Jewish-Globalist-Zionist-Billionaire-Hollywood legend, Democrat Party mega donor, Holohoax promoter -- a true "made man" sitting at or near the apex of the Jewish power pyramid over America. And now, thanks to the shocking exposes published by Sulzberger's Slimes, the world is finally seeing the full extent of Weinstein's predatory madness.

There is no telling how many goy "shiksas" this Satanic swine couched or forced himself upon.

And the "casting couch" is only the least of it. Multiple allegations of rape, exposure & masturbation, and implied threats against potential whistle blowers are suddenly flowing forth from all quarters and being splattered across the front pages and TV screens of the Piranha Press. Though Sugar and I, er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times are pleased to see this MONSTER finally get his long overdue comeuppance, there is a vexing question that stumped us, for a little while, namely, "Why now?"

Who ordered the "hit" on Harvey Weinstein?

Why did King Sulzberger and his court suddenly take down King Weinstein? The truth was buried for so long, why not continue to cover up for a fellow Tribesman of high rank? Did Harvey expose himself to the wrong girl or something? Is there a higher ranking mobster that big mouth Swinestein disrespected? There has to be a reason for this "hit" because only a big Jew can take down another big Jew. It's a Mafia thing. And Weinstein appears to understand this.

Headline: Daily Mail (UK)
EXCLUSIVE: Hillary supporter Harvey Weinstein thinks a 'right wing conspiracy out to get me' is reason he has been revealed as serial sexual harasser (here)

According to the article, Weinstein believes he was “being set up by a team of people who are out to get him. "Nobody is claiming that the New York Times spent any money to get this story done but other organisations may have done,” a source told the Daily Mail.

If Weinstein is right about a "right wing conspiracy" taking him down, and the New York Times running with the story only because it was going to come out through other channels anyway, then what we are likely seeing here is a repeat of the Monica Lewinsky sex-scandal which Israel and US-based Israel Firsters used to impeach President Bill Clinton back in 1998. That operation was also referred to as "a vast right wing conspiracy" by then First Lady Killary Rotten Clinton. You see, the term "right wing conspiracy" is code language for Bibi Satanyahoo's gang. No one dares to say "Israel!"

Satanyahoo hated the Clintons for trying to force Israel to make a peace deal with the Palestinians. The current play against Democrat-Globalist King Weinstein strikes a similar blow against the Democrats -- punishment for the Party's support of the "Iran Deal" and Palestinian peace initiatives.

Here's the "smoking gun."

Headline: Breitbart (March 25, 2015): Obama Lackey, Anti-Israel Propagandist Weinstein Honored for Fighting Anti-Semitism (here)

"Hearing Weinstein speak regarding the need to fight anti-Semitism is particularly galling, given that both he and Katzenberg heavily supported wildly anti-Israel President Obama in both 2008 and 2012.

Weinstein himself is fine with purveying anti-Semitism in films he supports. He produced and distributed Miral, an anti-Semitic diatribe straight from the Palestinian playbook. American Jewish Committee executive director David Harris said the film was a “blatantly one-sided event… the film has a clear political message, which portrays Israel in a highly negative light.” Weinstein then used his Jewish birth to defend the film, which uses every anti-Israel trope in the book. The Forward described the film thusly:

[T]he Israelis depicted onscreen — soldiers bulldozing homes and countering rock-throwing with machine-gun fire, wardens whipping political prisoners and settlers building homes in Arab population centers because, as one character puts it, “what they really want is all of Palestine” — don’t necessarily come across as the peace-seeking sort.

Weinstein, however, said that the film was wonderful.

Globalist Weinstein's "controversial" film, "Miral," portrayed Palestinians in a sympathetic way. That's a big no-no for the ultra-Zionist Likudnik scum at Bannon's Breitbart.

As it was with the Lewinsky scandal, we see Bibi's agents in the American "right" foaming at the mouth over Weinstein's take-down. Sean Hannity, FAUX News, The Drudge Retard, the "conservative" clowns of AM Talk-Radio, and Steve Bannon's boys at Israeli Not-So-Brightbart are all fuming overtime over this scandal. With the story already having been put together by sources unknown, there was nothing the Slimes could have done to protect Harvey from Satanyahoo's henchmen anymore. In fact, there may even be elements within the Slimes itself (or above the Slimes?) who are aligned with Satanyahoo on this operation.

Israeli asset Matt Drudge (cough cough) was used as a conduit for taking down Bill Clinton. According to Weinstein, "right wing conspirators" actually had put all the pieces together before the Slimes ran with the story.

It's not that Swinestein is "anti-Israel," -- far from it. But because he, like George Soros, like the Clintons and like Mr. & Mr. Obongo, leans toward the Globalist Left -- which Likud Party types see as an impediment to their ultra nationalist expansionism -- Globalist Weinstein got himself on Zionist Satanyahoo's hit list. Jew on Jew -- Zionist Mafia Family vs Globalist Mafia Fanily. It's really high-level greaseball "Kosher Nostra" stuff.

The ongoing Israeli-engineered crack-up of the Demoncrat-Republican't Globalist Establishment, ordered by Satanyahoo and tactically engineered by Israeli asset Steve Bannon, will likely take down more Globalists, of both parties, in the months and years to come, thus benefiting Donald Trumpstein greatly. But the higher purpose isn't just about "making America Great Again" (if it ever was that, at all) -- but rather, making Israel Greater.

Bottom Line: Jewish brother Weinstein was sacrificed, for Greater Israel. It's not personal, Harvey. It's strictly business.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that more women are accusing Harvey Weinstein of sexual harassment.

Boobus Americanus 2: It's amazing how this could have been going on for so long without him being exposed.

Sugar: Ssatanyahoo played this beautifully.

Editor: Maybe the Kosher Nostra will weaken itself through in-fighting.

Kathe #fundie rr-bb.com

[...] When one gets up on a high horse, something will come along to knock you off of it. It reminds me of the time my then 17 year old was taunting God. He was sitting at our kitchen table and we were having a discussion about God. We were teaching him about attitude and warning him that if he didn't straighten up that God would step in. He said "bring it on". We were wide eyed and said you have no idea what you are talking about. That night skiing he broke in arm so badly they had to ambulance him to the hospital for emergency surgery and put pins in his bones to hold it together. The next day he apologized to us and to God for his attitude and he is now married, 24 and just finished bible college and is a pastor. [...]

Michael Savage #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Last week on his talk radio program, Michael Savage got into an argument with a caller over whether California lawmakers should rename a San Francisco tunnel in honor of Robin Williams. The caller, who said he was a veteran suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), defended the move, while Savage objected to the plan, claiming that it would promote suicide.

After a lengthy argument, Savage hung up on the caller and proceeded to attack him. “I am so sick and tired with everyone with their complaints about PTSD, depression. Everyone wants their hand held and a check, a government check. What, are you the only generation that had PTSD? The only generation that’s depressed?”

He then blamed America’s problems on those who “cry like a little baby” over depression: “If the whole nation is told, ‘boo-hoo-hoo, come and get a medication, come and get treatment, talk about mental illness,’ you know what you wind up with? You wind up with Obama in the White House and lawyers in every phase of the government, that’s what you wind up with. It’s a weak, sick nation. A weak, sick, broken nation.”

Savage continued that veterans with PTSD are a “bunch of losers” and recommended that they be more like Michael Savage.

“You need men like me to save the country,” he said. “You need men to stand up and say stop crying like a baby over everything.” He continued that “men are so weak and so narcissistic” that it is “no wonder ISIS can defeat our military.”

Multiple #sexist dailywire.com

Caleb Mills: It's kind of crazy how the left thinks the right is dividing the country when the left is literally segregating all types of people by characteristics they cannot control and putting them on a spectrum of "goodness" based upon said unalterable characteristics. No person's unalterable characteristics should get in the way of someone living out their normal life, it should be their character and actions that speak for what type of person they are, and boy are the left speaking loudly about how terrible they are.

ladykrystyna: Exactly. They lump everyone into groups and then decide who is the most aggrieved and that group will always win. It's deliberately divisive. Now we fight each other from within these tribes rather than standing together and saying - NO! we may not agree on everything, but we won't be divided this way. We have to work together."

Unfortunately, as a group, human beings are more like mobs and sheep.

Jason Liles: that's why Trump should go transgender. Then any criticism can be deemed as hate speech and the left would be forced to accept him..

Andy Prosseda: And when he does, he MUST insist, at EVERY press conference, that they refer to him as the FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT of the United States.
Of course, we're just dreamin' here, but if any President might do something like that, it's Trump

Carl Carlson: Standing clapping / laughing till my side hurt

Steve Tallent: “I identify as a women in my dealings with the press and on Twitter. In all other aspects of my life, I identify as a man. Who are you to say that I can’t do this? You say gender is in the brain and those are the times my brain wants to be female.”

Bob Barr: Your just looking for attention. If your born a male your a male...simple as that. Your body isn't screwed up your mind is.

Ehud Would #wingnut #fundie #homophobia tribaltheocrat.com

Columnist Peter Heck has thrown caution to the wind with a recent forecast: “Criminalization of Christianity is on America’s horizon”. And others in the American Redoubt movement have launched a fictional serial based on the same proposition of a dystopian future. At which every Evangelical GOPer reassures himself, clutching tight his Scofield bible and reciting to himself Lee Greenwood’s refrain, “And I’m proud to be an American, where at least I know I’m free!”

But as we shall see, these dire prognostications are so far behind the curve as to actually lend power to the enemy. Because speaking of the threat as something spied on a distant horizon only dismisses all the ways Christianity is already being outlawed.

This is the meaning back of every affirmation of religious Pluralism — a thing taken for granted even in our most ‘conservative’ denominations today — that the public square is an equal playing field open to all faiths so long as they tolerate all others; which, of course, assumes them to be of equal validity and value. So, according to this civic theory (the default position in the churches presently, but the precise opposite view of the church at the time of America’s settlement) the entry fee for Christians to the republic we founded is to repudiate Christ’s sovereign claim over all areas of life. Which then is a denial of the essential character of Christianity; and one which casts all orthodox as “fringe”, “zealots”, “bigots”, or even “terrorists”. So all who dissent from this new doctrine in deference to the crown rights of Christ over America are regarded as criminals of the worst sort.

And I’d dare any who think otherwise to simply refuse service to the next Moslem in their business on the basis of his being a Moslem on the grounds that the scripture abjures us to have no part with the works of darkness; or decline to rent an apartment to a Wiccan who works as receptionist for an abortion clinic on the grounds that you don’t want to aid nor lend comfort to such evil. You will quickly be disabused of the notion that you are at liberty to practice the Christian faith in this country.

So too has every overture for civil rights been a demand for the suppression of Christianity. Because the entire concept — rights created by statecraft to countermand God-given rights — is a repudiation of the Christian worldview. The real world implications of which have infringed against our God-given rights to things like property, free association, and even self-defense. This absurdity of forcing White Christians, at proverbial (and sometimes literal) gunpoint, into service of degenerate and hostile aliens (how is that not slavery, by the by?) has matriculated necessarily into LGBT demands to “Bake the cake, Bigot!”, and like absurdities. All of which presuppose the basic convictions of Christian conscience and doctrine to be illegal already.

HisdaughterJen #fundie christianforums.com

False Prophet technology?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770

"Prince Charles will appear at conference as a hologram"

"His detractors may argue that his green principles do not stand up to close examination.
But now Prince Charles is set to confound his critics by addressing an energy conference - as a hologram. Determined to keep his environmental damage to a minimum, Charles will save the 15 tons of carbon that would have been generated by flying himself and his staff 7,000 miles to the World Future Energy Summit in Abu Dhabi. "

According to the article, Al Gore has done it too.

Maybe this is what John saw in Revelation...?:

Rev 13:14 Because of the signs he was given power to do on behalf of the first beast, he deceived the inhabitants of the earth. He ordered them to set up an image in honor of the beast who was wounded by the sword and yet lived.
Rev 13:15He was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that it could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed.

Null #racist kiwifarms.net

You all laugh at the idea, you scoff at your own tribe and loudly object to any idea of global anti-white sentiment by saying that "skin color doesn't matter" and "so what if we're all brown"

You'll be alive for 50 more years, and unfortunately for you, you are going to be a minority in your own country.

"Who cares? It's just skin color. White people aren't special."

Even if you don't think being white is anything special or unique, and you cast aside how the epicenters of culture and human development in this world mostly seem to congregate around the West, do consider that it's not particularly important. Even if we were all completely congruent to one another, except for skin color. Even if you don't believe your 'tribe' exists, they do, and if you don't believe it, the people you are calling harmless do believe it, and do have tribes, and you're not fucking a part of them. The most racist people on the planet aren't white.

And what happens when you become a minority in your own country and no longer have control? Not "race replacement" genocide, actual genocide.

https://archive.is/7SBQw

You and your family will be tortured. You'll call the police, but the police has since undergone reforms due to widespread protest and fears of racism. Now the police hate you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i21HcugW_kI


We didn't have Apartheid. Segregation was 65 years ago. Jim Crow was 100 years ago. Slavery was 150 years ago. The wounds should have fucking healed by now. I was a part of the generation who voted for the first black president. I grew up in the 2000s were there was no racial tension that I could feel, where Carlos Mencia and Dave Chapelle were the #1 and #2 comedians on cable network, and they still hate us. You grow up as a white kid in a black school and they fucking hate you. When I was in school with only a handful of black and muslim students, I never saw them bullied or teased.

Once that tide turns it doesn't turn back. They fucking hate you.

My advice: buy bitcoin, move to Asia. The Asians are racist but a half-white half-asian kid will do pretty well over there compared to a white child in the U.S. after it gets black'd.

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

The intra-mural war between the Satanyahu Zionist and the Soros Globalist crime families of the "Kosher Nostra" heats up (no pun intended) with Trumpstein's decision to stick it to the Globalist faction by pulling the United States out of the "Paris Climate Agreement." As the world's leading emitter of harmless plant-food molecules (CO2), this essentially means that the devious deal, in spite of China, India and Russia's feigned "commitment" to the Paris scheme, will, in due course, die altogether -- except perhaps in the Communist EU and many individual American states.

Now would be a good time to summarize some important historical propaganda milestones of the 40-year old hoax that has "evolved" from being known as "The Greenhouse Effect" TM to "Global Warming" TM to "Climate Change" TM.

•1970: With great fanfare, the first "Earth Day" (April 22nd, Lenin's Birthday) kicked-off with CBS's Walter Cronkite (CFR) hosting a nationally televised TV special. The theme of "saving the planet" was thus introduced to the gullible young hippie crowd who have since grown up to takeover America, at the behest of their invisible handlers (cough cough).

Cronkite and the media's heavy promotion of "Earth Day 1970" was a sure indication of a Globalist push for some sinister agenda.

•1975-1978: During the mid 1970's, "scientific" talk of a coming "ice age" (not necessarily related to pollution) was used to frighten the population.

People aged 45 and under cannot remember that we once had a bit of an ice-age scare.

•1979-1982: At a time when world population and plant-food emissions were far lower than they are today, concerns about an ice-age are suddenly replaced with tales of a "Greenhouse Effect" TM that is expected to wreak havoc by the Year 2000. After nearly 40 years, none of the dire predictions have come to pass as "doomsday" is again and again pushed up to yet another far off day in "our children's future."

•1990: The children's TV show, Captain Planet and The Planeteers" is unveiled by Globalist Ted Turner. The series will be broadcast on TBS from 1990 to 1992. A sequel series, The New Adventures of Captain Planet, is later broadcast from 1993-1996. Many millions of children, now in their 30's, were brainwashed by cartoons which featured the green-haired Captain Planet and his young "Planeteers" battling against evil business and oil men such as "Hoggish Greedly."

1. In the early 1980's, images of the Statue of Liberty, predicted to be under water by 2000, were used to frighten school children across America. 2. Captain Planet and the Planeteers: Evil Communist propaganda aimed at helpless children -- many of whom have since grown up into adult libtards.

1992: CFR member, Senator and soon-to-be Vice President, Al Gore (D-TN) publishes Earth in the Balance, in which he calls for a "Global Marshall Plan to "save the planet." The book is hyped to the stars by Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press.

2006: Al Gore, who had almost been elected President in 2000, authors another propaganda book titled, An Inconvenient Truth. Dealing solely with the "crisis" of Global Warming" TM, the error-filled book serves as the basis for a movie version directed by Davis Guggenheim (cough cough) and narrated by Al Gore. Gore's fake film premiers at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival. The Marxist movie is then mega-hyped by the Piranha Press and wins two Academy Awards. It would later be shown in classrooms across America and Britain. Adding idiocy to insult, Gore is then awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his assinine activism.

The world gone mad! Greasy Gore collects an Academy Award and a Nobel Prize.

2015: The Communist Pope Francis issues an unprecedented edict directing his followers to believe that "Climate Change" TM is real. He condemns it as a "sin" and urges the world to "take action." All of a sudden, the Judenpresse loves a Catholic Pope. Hmmmm.

2016: Hollywood degenerate Leonardo DiCaprio releases a National Geographic crockumentary about "Climate Change" TM. The pack of lies, massively hyped by the Piranha Press, is titled, Before the Flood. DiCommio and Poop Frankie are now the biggest public faces pushing for action (global taxes on plant food and NWO control over business) on "Climate Change" TM.

In the absence of any real science to support the outrageous claims, it was these propaganda initiatives, combined with never-ending Fake News stories, that brought nearly 50% of the American public to now believing in at least some degree of man-made "Climate Change" TM. It is a classic case of bought-off "science" and "manufactured consent" being used to cover up the Globalist agenda to tax the air we exhale -- and which plants "happily" inhale -- and then transfer that stolen wealth to UN bureaucrats and Turd World politicians. That's the truth, and the seditious scum at Sulzberger's Slimes damn well know it.

Now before "youse guys" (New Jersey speak for the plural of you) jump back on the Trump Train over this welcome event, keep in mind that Trumpstein's war on Globalism and EUism is being waged on behalf of Israeli Super Nationalists working for a "Greater Israel" -- not America. Trumpstein also blew a golden opportunity to publicly denounce the Fake Science of the warmists -- opting to oppose the deal on the basis of economic arguments only, while still acknowledging that some small degree of man-made warming is occuring -- when it is not! And finally, because the false belief remains in place, about 20 US states (including the massive states of New York & California) will still have expensive and job-killing "carbon controls" anyway.

The great hoax is still alive and well -- as is the Globalist movement.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the whole world is condemning Trump for pulling us out of the Paris Agreement.

Boobus Americanus 2: What an ass! All he cares about is raping Mother Earth for profit.

Sugar: Lissten to the sstupid little "Planeteer" from the 1980'ss. All grown up physsically, yet the intellect of a frickin' child remainss.

Editor: Indeed. Libtards are essentially arrested-development cases.

BlancaNieves #fundie stormfront.org

Re: Biological male wins major women's cycling event

Another "Duh!" moment.

The Olympic Committee decided a couple of years ago, I believe, that they would allow transgenders to compete as women, thereby signalling the death knell for women's sports. It was already getting bad when they started fast-tracking athletes for citizenship so that they could play for a different country and then they allowed professions to enter what was once a competition purely for amateurs. A steady drip-drip of declining standards and permitting the impermissible has eroded the meaning of the Olympics.

As already mentioned: all this will make women's sport a total joke. It's a very exceptional woman who can be a match for a man in physical endeavours and someone who will dress up as a woman in order to beat one in competition is a poor excuse for a man!

As for professional sports: back in the day a player would join a team and would stay there for life. Later players would occasionally be traded but now that's all you get and the amount of blacks playing on some European teams is jaw-dropping.

Nathan "Leucosticte" Larson #fundie incels.co

As an accelerationist, I actually believe an incelocalypse is likely to happen someday

By "incelocalypse" I mean, the day when incels seize pussy by force. All the incelocalypse is, is the abolition of feminism (a fairly new innovation), and the restoration of patriarchy. Patriarchy is a system in which foids are treated as property to be transferred from father to husband; typically this will be done when they are in their jailbait years, to maximize their lifetime value to the husband and minimize the expense of the father's raising them in preparation for marriage. This is how it works during peacetime; during war, of course, foids may be seized by force as war brides.

We could just as easily use a neoreaction-inspired term, and call the incelocalyptic event the Restoration. A Restoration is when a monarchy is brought back to power. Since patriarchy is just monarchy on a familial scale, all we are really doing is restoring men to their rightful position as kings of their households.

When I look at politics, I see no signs that there's going to be a switch back to patriarchy through the electoral process. We've gotten to the point where even the cuckservatives who timidly put some pro-family idea out there (e.g. "maybe we wouldn't have so many school shootings if there weren't so many boys being raised by single moms") get shamed. They can't even talk about specific proposals for reducing the number of single moms, since all the workable ideas would involve giving men authority over foids. Even the third parties, like the Libertarian Party, are a bunch of bluepilled cucks when it comes to relations between the sexes, despite the fact that they hardly ever win elections and therefore have little to lose.

Moreover, there are no signs that the trend toward doubling down on feminism is going to stop any time soon. On the contrary, in 2018, more foids have been nominated for Congress than ever before in history. This is going to be a self-perpetuating cycle, in which feminist policies lead to more female officeholders, who then enact more feminist policies, etc. They're going to be training the young foids to be "leaders" as well.

Eventually, the whole system will collapse under its own weight, because it's going to be impossible for any group of male dissidents to put a stop to the advance of feminism. Till the bitter end, they're all going to be frantically scrabbling for whatever pussy they can get (or think they can get), rather than wanting to stick their necks out and demand change. We never see men organize and protest in the streets for patriarchy, the way that foids do, because men don't create male-only spaces anymore that would be conducive for setting up a united front like that. It's foids who are always setting up "women's leadership programs" and other female-only groups, where they can freely plot against men.

Once foids are in charge of everything, even the state will stagnate and eventually collapse, just like what happens to every other big enterprise run by foids. The state will not be able to carry out its functions properly when so much of its energies are devoted to feel-good stuff like inclusivity codes of conduct and endless new measures against sexual harassment, designed to eliminate intelligent but unattractive men from the organization and better facilitate the alpha-fucks/beta-bucks feminine imperative. High-quality people will not be attracted to an organization like that, or allowed to remain in it.

Meanwhile, the demographic situation will continue to worsen. The fertility rate will continue to plunge, and humanity will retrogress to a more primitive state due to the dysgenic effect of feminist practices. Since this is unsustainable, it will have to end eventually. Maybe the bulk of mankind will regress to a subhuman state by the time of the final collapse, and it will be like the Planet of the Apes.

When you see historic events like foids gaining more power than they've ever had before, you should rejoice, because it means we're not standing still; we're making more progress toward the collapse and rebuilding. When the end of civilization does come, the new civilization will have to be built along patriarchist lines, because that is the fundamental human instinct and what we always go back to, whenever the state doesn't get in the way. The male wants to be dominant and the female wants to be submissive, so people will revert back to that when they have the opportunity.

Maybe the new order will also get corrupted by feminism and collapse, but hopefully in the meantime there will be a golden era that we can enjoy. The new society could very well be monarchical or otherwise undemocratic, since those types of systems seem to promote manliness more than democratic systems, which are arguably feminine in nature. Democracy is about diffusion of responsibility among the legislators, much like what foids do whenever anyone tries to hold them accountable.

The cool thing is, you don't necessarily have to do anything to make the incelocalypse happen. You just have to watch the signs of the impending collapse and at the appropriate time, make the preparations to survive and be in a good position to scoop up that jailbait pussy when it becomes available. Till then, it's mostly just a matter of LDAR'ing or whatever.

Now, am I just saying all this to try to cope with the fact that I can't be in politics anymore, and am unlikely to go ER? Maybe. But it seems like almost everyone else is the same way. Maybe as we get closer to the incelocalypse, and the state's grip on power begins to weaken, and perhaps the means of providing food and other necessities to the people begins to break down, there will be more ERs and Minassians. Like communism, feminism is an egalitarian system that has unlimited potential for fucking up both government and private industry, so I wouldn't rule out such possibilities.

jamesalbright #fundie wnd.com

The Atheist Satanists in the Democratic Party are so demonically driven to overthrow the Judea Christian laws and government in the USA that they are willing to put Americans at risk to accomplish this. The Atheist Satanists in the Democratic Party are bringing Muslim terrorists and their supporters to the USA to build a voter base among them in order to obtain enough votes to take control of the US government and overthrow Judea Christian laws and government while they implement a anti-Christian Atheist Satanist Socialist government that will completely outlaw Christianity in the USA. The Atheist Satanists are bringing Muslim terrorists and their supporters to the USA knowing that in the counties they come from they are being socially engineered from the time they are born to hate Jews, the State of Israel, Christians and the USA. And when one of these Muslim terrorists commits a terrorist act such as occurred when one of the Muslim terrorists they let into the military as part of their plan to lure the Muslims into their voter base, killed 13 and wounded 31 fellow US Army soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas, they covered up that it was a terrorist act when they called it work place violence. The Atheist Satanists are likewise keeping the public in the dark about the connection between the wildfires occurring in the USA and the Muslim terrorists they are bringing to the USA in order to keep the public from realizing that they are willing to put their own people at risk in their evil scheme to overthrow the Judea Christian government and implement a anti-Christian Atheist Satanist Socialist government that will outlaw Christianity.

Their activities are part of the fulfillment of Rev 18:2, which foretold that Babylon the great, which Jesus revealed to me and sent me out to tell His people is the USA would become like a prison that consists of ever kind of hateful bird, which includes the Atheist Satanists in the Democratic Party and the Muslims.

Rev 18:2 And he cried out with a mighty voice, saying, “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great! She has become a dwelling place of demons and a prison of every unclean spirit, and a prison of every unclean and hateful bird.

Unnamed teacher #fundie rawstory.com

The family of a Muslim child is upset because they say the 12-year-old’s teacher called him a terrorist in front of his classmates, KHOU reports.

Waleed Abushaaban, an honor student at a middle school in Fort Bend County, Texas, said the class was watching a movie on Thursday when his teacher directed the hateful words his way.

“We were in the class watching a movie,” Waleed told KHOU, “and I was just laughing at the movie and the teacher said, ‘I wouldn’t be laughing if I was you.’ And I said why? She said, ‘because we all think you’re a terrorist.'”

Abushaaban said the class was watching the soccer film, Bend It Like Beckham, after completing testing when the comment was made. He said the teacher’s comment prompted the other students to start mocking him.

“They were like, ‘oh I see a bomb!’ and they started all laughing and making jokes,” he told the station. “I was upset and I felt like I was put in the corner and like everybody was just looking at me.“

The school district has removed the teacher from the classroom while it conducts an investigation. But Abushaaban’s parents and local Muslim leaders want her fired.

“Just because my son is a Muslim doesn’t mean he is a terrorist,” Malek Abushaaban told KHOU. “He’s an American. He’s as American as anybody else. He was born here. That’s all he knows, is how to be an American.”

According to KHOU, the family plans to keep Waleed at the school, and aside from wanting the English and Language Arts teacher fired, they want students and teachers to undergo religious sensitivity training.

In a statement sent to KHOU about the incident, Fort Bend Independent School District officials say the teacher claims she was trying to make a point about negative stereotypes, but did so poorly.

“While the teacher reports her statements were made in the context of trying to make a point about negative stereotypes, District officials do not believe that the teacher exercised the appropriate sensitivity expected of the District’s educators, and do not believe that the statements were made in a manner that is in keeping with the District’s Core Beliefs and Commitments,” the statement reads.

It’s not the first time a young Muslim student has been the target of anti-Muslim sentiment in Texas public schools.

Last year, 14-year-old Ahmed Mohamed was arrested when he brought homemade clock to school. Teachers and school police accused the child of making a “hoax bomb.” Mohamed was cleared and in the midst of outcry over the incident.

Warren Davidson #fundie rawstory.com

A Donald Trump-backing Ohio Republican is defending his claims that “moochers” and “pretenders” are overwhelming the Veterans Affairs’ health care system with fraudulent claims — even though there’s little evidence of abuse.

Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) suggested earlier this week at a town hall event in West Chester, Ohio, that some veterans who sought care from the federal agency weren’t as worthy of treatment than others, reported the Journal-News.

“Just like workers comp out here’s got moochers, I wish that there were no vets that were the same sort of problem on our society,” Davidson said. “But part of the problem is there are some vets that are moochers and they’re clogging up the system, and we do as taxpayers want to make sure the VA filters out these folks that are pretenders. Just like we wish there were no people out there with stolen valor, but that’s a problem in the vet community, too.”

The Army veteran and first-term congressman from Troy, who won a special election to succeed former House Speaker John Boehner, drew strong criticism from the GOP chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee.

“I can only hope that Rep. Davidson misspoke, and I look forward to him clarifying his remarks,” said Rep. Jeff Miller (R-FL).

The national spokesman for the Veterans of Foreign Wars also slammed Davidson for his remarks.

“Honorably discharged veterans with service-connected wounds, illnesses and injuries, or who are indigent due to circumstances beyond their control, are not moochers,” said the spokesman, Joe Davis.

But Davidson, who has introduced legislation that would require all members of Congress and their staffers to receive health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs, said he meant what he said.

“As a veteran, I know the subpar care that many of my brothers and sisters in arms have received, and I will not be content until that is changed,” Davidson said. “Any effort to suggest I have anything other than a soldier’s passion for providing our veterans with the care they deserve is dishonest.”

His spokesman cited four cases of VA benefits fraud uncovered this year, all of which were prosecuted.

Only one of those four cases involved VA health care services, when a California man falsely claimed to be a decorated Marine Corps veteran to get health care benefits and other assistance.

The Inspector General’s Office investigated 14 cases between Oct. 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016, which resulted in five arrests.

Davidson was among four Republican congressmen who gave interviews promoting Trump on a white nationalist radio host during the Republican National Convention.

Timothy Alexader Guzman #conspiracy informationclearinghouse.info

Maybe it was a plan that went horribly wrong, something they could no longer control. Was the Corona virus or COVID-19 spread intentionally? What if this virus was used against China as a weapon of choice to destabilize China’s economy and push back against China’s growing influence? We don’t know for sure, but it is possible. Investigations are ongoing. Nothing has not been confirmed. But what has been confirmed is what history has taught us given the facts on how the use of biological warfare for various purposes, against many peoples and nations has been happening for some time. One of the most well-known incidents of biological warfare occurred in 1763, the British Empire had planned and successfully managed to spread smallpox virus to the Native Americans during the Pontiac Rebellion in Pennsylvania. Chief Pontiac of the Ottowa launched an attack on Fort Detroit, a British military base. Other nations joined the rebellion including the Senecas, the Hurons, Delawares, and Miamis. As the war raged, an Indian delegation asked the British to surrender, but they refused, however, the British offered gifts including food, alcohol and material items that included two blankets and a handkerchief from people who had smallpox. Although the American Indians had experienced the disease in the past, the idea was to spread the disease among the Native American populations in an attempt to push back the rebellion or to defeat it once and for all. Another example of biological warfare was when Imperial Japan before and during World War II had a bio-weapons program that managed to drop numerous bombs on a number of Chinese cities from airplanes killing an estimated 580,000 Chinese people with bombs that were made of infected fleas, some even contained cholera and shigella during the Sino-Japanese war between the 1930′s and 1940′s.

In 1981, the CIA with help from U.S. military had launched an operation against Cuba by unleashing a strain of Dengue Fever also known as “hemorrhagic fever’ effecting more than 273,000 people killing 158 including 101 children. On September 6, 1981, The New York Times reported on Fidel Castro’s comments regarding the U.S. government in particularly, blaming the CIA for the outbreak when he said that ”we urge the United States Government to define its policy in this field, to say whether the C.I.A. will or will not be authorized again- or has already been authorized – to organize attacks against leaders of the revolution and to use plagues against our plants, our animals and our people.” The report said that the “epidemic of dengue fever that has made 340,000 people ill and has killed about 150″ but the State Department under-then President Ronald Reagan stated that “Mr. Castro’s charges of possible United States involvement in the epidemic were ”totally without foundation.” The State department quickly blamed the Castro’s revolution as a failure:

The Cuban Government has always tried to blame the United States for its failures and its internal problems,” the department said. ”The Cuban revolution is a failure, and it is obviously easier to blame external forces like the United States than to admit those failures

Dr, Ronald St. John, chief of communicable diseases for the Pan American Health Organization was interviewed by the New York Times said that “for the first time, so-called dengue-2 spread to Cuba.” Dr. St. John claimed that it is common in Southeast Asia and that it produces “the same symptoms as the other three” and that ”if you get a wave of dengue-1, dengue-3 or dengue-4 and then another wave of type 2, this is a bad combination.” Dengue-2 causes you too loose body fluids causing shocks that can lead to eventually death. Convenient for the CIA who saw it as an opportunity to cause panic on Cuba which is located in one of the most hot and humid regions in the world. However, The New York Times managed to downplay Cuba’s accusation’s by ending the story by blaming the spread of the disease on returning Cuban troops from Africa and other people from other parts of the Caribbean who might have brought Dengue fever into Cuba:

Some State Department officials believe the introduction of dengue-2 into Cuba is a result of the return to Cuba of troops who had been stationed in Angola or elsewhere in Africa, where the strain is found. But Dr. St. John said dengue-2 had been found in other parts of the Caribbean and might have been carried to Cuba from there or elsewhere overseas

Reports suggested that Cuba had a very small number of cases in 1944, and again in 1977. The 1981 outbreak was blamed on covert flyover operations conducted by the CIA with military owned airplanes, you know, the same airplanes that were most probably used against Nicaragua’s Sandinistas to transport weapons and other materials to the Contras around the same time. Since the 20th century, the U.S. has been the leader in developing various biological and chemical weapons through the U.S. Army’s Biological Warfare Laboratories based at Fort Detrick, Maryland since the late 1940′s, around the start of the Cold War. The U.S. biological warfare program that supposedly ended in 1969 developed a handful of biological weapons ready for use including anthrax, Q-fever and botulism and conducted research in hopes of weaponizing diseases including smallpox, Hantavirus, Lassa fever, yellow fever, typhus, dengue fever and the bird flu among them. An article from August 6, 2019 on Fort Detrick from the UK’s ‘The Independent’ titled ‘Research into deadly viruses and biological weapons at US army lab shut down over fears they could escape’ last August. Ironically, Secretary of State and Neocon Mike Pompeo called it the “Wuhan virus” since they blame China for the outbreak, but it seems that the U.S. had its own problems when it comes to their own labs who conduct research with the most deadly viruses:

America’s main biological warfare lab has been ordered to stop all research into the deadliest viruses and pathogens over fears contaminated waste could leak out of the facility. Fort Detrick, in Maryland, has been the epicentre of the US Army’s bioweapons research since the beginning of the Cold War. But last month the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – the government’s public health body – stripped the base of its license to handle highly restricted “select agents”, which includes Ebola, smallpox and anthrax

The story was basically about the CDC who inspected Fort Detrick and found problems with new procedures used to decontaminate waste water. The article says that Fort Detrick continued its research for defensive purposes to “protect the warfighter from biological threats” although the U.S. declared that it abandoned their biological weapons program since 1969:

Although the United States officially abandoned its biological weapons programme in 1969, Fort Detrick has continued defensive research into deadly pathogens on the list of “select agents”, including the Ebola virus, the organisms that cause the plague, and the highly toxic poison ricin. The army’s Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, based at Fort Detrick, says its primary mission today is to “protect the warfighter from biological threats” but its scientists also investigate outbreaks of disease among civilians and other threats to public health. In recent years it has been involved in testing possible vaccines for Ebola, after several epidemics of the deadly virus in Africa

Sooner or later, the truth will come out. I believe that the U.S. government knows how COVID-19 began and where it was going. The U.S. government and major corporate arms manufacturers and the rest of the Military-Industrial Complex is no stranger to biological weapons adding to their arsenal of nuclear and chemical weapons at their disposal which makes them, much more dangerous. The truth about COVID-19 will eventually come out. In the meantime, as the COVID-19 pandemic continues, a war against Russia, China, Iran or Venezuela is in the works and a coming economic crisis with an election coming this November seems like 2020 will be the year of a perfect storm.

RIP Wm. Shockley #racist fstdt.com

I was neither born nor raised to "hate" anyone. The use of the word "hate" here is in its purest, most vile form, as it is surely a negative and destructive emotion, and I deny it as part of my natural character. That said, I have determined that cannot really "hate" niggers... I am weary of them. Let me explain. This is the way I see it:

a long, long time ago, far, far away, there was Dark Continent called Africa, free of Niggers. That's right... there were no "niggers at that time. Individual tribes existed I harmony, much like the Native American, hunting and gathering food and other essentials for happy life. There was some war, of course, when the population grew out of control and more land was required for the increase of inhabitants. There were the Productive... those who hunted and gathered and had skills to produce clothing, tents, fishing vessels, etc., and those people were valuable to the community. Tribes had leaders, elders, chieftains Then, as in every society, as the population grew, there became a group of slackers... those who just didn't think their efforts would make any difference. Crime was punished according the its severity and justice not necessarily humane, as we understand the concept of "humane" today.

So, as productive societies expanded, extra farm and ranch help was needed, and some enterprising folks made an industry of "slave transport". If you had a ship, there was money to be made by bringing "cargo" across the Atlantic Ocean to sell to American farmers and ranchers. Tribal elders began rounding up the people of their tribes they could do without... those slackers and criminals and just lazy... and found they could make money by selling them to slave traders. (If I am to believe the story forwarded by movies such as "Roots", I must believe aa continent of people were willing to allow kidnappers onto their land to steal their people by force.)

Keep in mind, there were still no "Niggers". That term was applied later by the owners mispronunciation of "Negro" or in reference to the country of Niger, where many of the slaves originated. Slavery was an industry, and the Negro was merely farm animals like his mule or his oxen, bred like all other live assets, and put to work. But some Negroes went back to the mindset for which they were ejected from their tribes in the first place... they were lazy or rebellious, or had some mental defect that precluded them from usefulness. Oh, but they cost money. A LOT of money for the owner, considering food, housing, clothing, etc., and the slave trackers weren't cheap either, when a slave ran away. This was the birth of the "nigger". Hence, examples had to be made by punishing the run-away or disobedient by whipping or some other type of punishment. Does it make sense that an owner would beat his work animals so that they were disabled from work, as portrayed in "Roots"?

Doubtful. Fast forward to January 1, 1863. The U.S. Civil War, purported to have been waged to free slaves, but in reality, a rebellion by the Southern states in response to an oppressive Government, and slavery became an afterthought, as slaves were popular in the North as well as the South. Take away the slaves, and commerce in the Confederate states becomes non-existent. That was the plan, and the U.S. Government took the high road and made slavery the main issue. On January 1, 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation was made into law, making free people out of slaves, most unable to read or write, or even count. (Sure, some rich blacks owned slaves as well as whites, but history doesn't speak of that, as it doesn't suit the narrative that ALL blacks were unequal.) Now, the right thing to do was ship all the freed slaves back to Africa, including the niggers, but America still had a growing population that needed food nd cotton, and all sorts of farm products. So, as the dark people multiplied, so did the nigger, and he became the "American Nigger", a breed unique unto itself.

You see, I call the American Nigger" unique because nowhere else on Earth has the AN had opportunities afforded them as those in America. Welfare programs have rewarded their excessive breeding by increasing benefits with every niglet they produce. Add in the many support organizations such as NAACP, CORE, UNCF, BET, Congressional Black Caucus, Miss Black America, on and on, and the AN is empowered to feel entitled, especially after four or five generations of lazy, criminal, and abject uselessness. Yes, my friends, I am weary f the American Nigger. I am weary of hearing "MF" in every other statement they make in public, having to look at their underwear above their pants hanging below their black asses, the rap music blaring from, their car stereo at every gas station. I am weary of trying to understand the mumbling and slurring of my language. Hey... let's go back to the "Hate" thing just a minute. I said I don't want to hate anyone, but is it fair to hate the natural traits of a people?

The culture? The mindset and the... well.. the differences. Is that nice enough? Basically, I'm weary of being vilified just because I'm a white man. I never owned a slave and I never met a slave. Matter of fact, my forefathers would probably have worked alongside niggers in the cane and cotton fields. They weren't rich or privileged. I'm weary of being called racist and white supremacist. I would never support, encourage, or condone harm to anther human being. Truth is, I have preferences. I prefer socializing with white people. I prefer living amongst white people. Shopping, eating, walking and driving amongst my own kind. "Preferences"... let me have mine without judgement. Is that too much to ask?

bgsawyer #fundie tinagilbertson.com

From a Judeo Christian perspective, we are to honor our parents. Period. Even in cases of abuse. It is a hard truth. There is an epidemic in the United States, and ONLY the United States, of adult children dishonoring, disrespecting and emotionally murdering their parents. There is NO excuse. Our society is excusing and creating an entire population of ingrates and wounded elderly persons. Think about it. God put honoring your parents up there with not murdering, lying, stealing, committing adultery, yet our society, and even our churches are making excuses for this particular sin which in the top ten of commandments! Why is that? Why do people make excuses for this? The burden of HONOR is ONLY on children. I also believe this means ADULT children. Small children are to OBEY their parents. Adults are to HONOR. Of course it is going to be more difficult for some than others…but that is life. I personally know several adults who have been horribly abused by their parents and they CHOOSE to HONOR and RESPECT them. They are incredible people!

Of course it is easy to love the loveable…anyone can do that. Children have become spoiled, ungrateful, entitled little brats…and these are the ADULTS that I am talking about!

There is NO excuse to dishonor your parents. NONE. Honor your son and daughter is NOT in the top ten.

As I said, this phenomenon of disowning your parents and dishonoring your parents is epidemic only in The United States. We need to be asking ourselves why.

Greg Holt #wingnut #racist trueconservativepundit.com

1.) California will immediately be renamed Libfornia.

2.) Libfornia will immediately become a U.S. territory. No voting rights that way you see. The former state of California’s Senators and Representatives will be removed from Washington and sent home.

3.) All liberals will be rounded up and sent to Libfornia effective immediately. What liberal would want to miss the opportunity to live in the land of their own making?

4.) All illegal border crossers will henceforth be sent to Libfornia, after all, liberals want open borders.

5.) MS-13 gang members that are caught crossing the border or are in police custody will be sent to Libfornia – liberals seem to think that their daughters should date MS-13 members rather then Republicans and think that MS-13 members are only misguided so they will be Libfornia’s problem from now on.

6.) As liberals hate America, America will not be responsible for Libfornia’s problems.

7.)Libfornia’s new capitol will be poop central, San Francisco. After all, what liberal could resist the city destroyed by their own stupidity. Covered in human feces, dirty drug needles, and a huge homeless population – all brought on by liberal Democrat policies.

eugene c. chavez #fundie greenspun.com

Let me remind you, killing of the weak, infirm, and wounded was known long before this law. It was the butchery of barbarians and savages. You would ask our Church teach that, instead of helping the dying. My faith teaches me to offer up prayer for them, not liquidate them. God has them in His merciful care. Suffering is temporal, hell is eternal.

Brandon Weaver #fundie facebook.com

Not necessarily anti-gay as much as being insulted that Obama would declare a month to be as such. Black History/Pride month has a cause, Indian History/Pride month has a cause, and Obama is inferring that we now have to teach gay lifestyles in schools and respect that for a month? Not happening.

Vox Day #conspiracy wnd.com

Vaccine advocates – although propagandists would be a more accurate term – often correctly claim that there is no scientific evidence proving that vaccines have ever killed anyone or caused autism. Therefore, they claim vaccines can be considered the cause of nothing but a cure for cancer, an end to war and the elimination of all human disease except that caused by dirty, unvaccinated children who are homeschooled by religious bigots. To even consider the mere possibility of questioning the intrinsic and perfect goodness of vaccines, any vaccine given for any reason, is to be not only anti-science, but personally responsible for murdering anyone who died of a disease that would have been prevented by vaccination.

[...]

The reason that the vaccine propagandist claim is correct is because there is also no scientific evidence that vaccines have not killed anyone or caused autism, because there is absolutely no valid scientific evidence on the matter. Most of the “science” in the studies that are widely cited by those who insist that vaccines are safe are simply statistical reviews, which involve as much use of actual science as polling former Playboy models. In the very few cases where an actual scientific experiment has been performed, the populations compared have not been between a vaccinated group and an unvaccinated control group, but rather two different groups that are both vaccinated to varying degrees.

The vaccine propagandists defend the failure of scientists to gather scientific evidence by begging the question. They insist that it would be unethical to permit a control group of children to go without vaccination, due to their assumption that the risks of vaccination are significantly outweighed by the dangers of the diseases vaccinated against. Thus, they perpetuate ignorance on the actual safety or danger of the current U.S. vaccine schedule.

[...]

Now, it is true that VAERS is not an entirely reliable system. It is estimated that between 90 percent and 99 percent of all vaccine-related events go unreported. Because we are looking at such a small snapshot of the total number of events, it is possible that the statistically obvious death spike would disappear with a more reliable reporting system. However, there is an additional clue, because there is an additional statistical death spike that just happens to take place among children of precisely the same age, between two and four months.

That is deaths by Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, which is simply the medical term for “the baby died and no one knows why.” SIDS deaths have been reduced over the years by the sleeping position campaign – put them on their back, not their stomach – and by improved reporting that has increasingly identified asphyxiation deaths. But the problem persists, as does the mysterious SIDS death spike that just happens to take place at precisely the same age as the VAERS death spike and the vaccine spike in the U.S. vaccine schedule. Are these three statistical spikes necessarily related? No, but there is more than enough statistical correlation to indicate that some degree of causation is involved.

Oliver Stone #conspiracy haaretz.com

Jewish control of the media is preventing an open discussion of the Holocaust, prominent Hollywood director Oliver Stone told the Sunday Times, adding that the U.S. Jewish lobby was controlling Washington's foreign policy for years.

In the Sunday interview, Stone reportedly said U.S. public opinion was focused on the Holocaust as a result of the "Jewish domination of the media," adding that an upcoming film of him aims to put Adolf Hitler and Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin "in context."

"There's a major lobby in the United States," Stone said, adding that "they are hard workers. They stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington."

The famed Hollywood director of such films as "Platoon" and "JFK," also said that while "Hitler was a Frankenstein," there was also a "Dr Frankenstein."

"German industrialists, the Americans and the British. He had a lot of support," Stone told the Sunday Times, adding that "Hitler did far more damage to the Russians than the Jewish people, 25 or 30 [million killed]."

Referring to the alleged influence of the powerful Jewish lobby on U.S. foreign policy, Stone said that Israel had distorted "United States foreign policy for years," adding he felt U.S. policy toward Iran was "horrible."

"Iran isn't necessarily the good guy," Stone said, insisting that Americans did not "know the full story."

Stone's comments to the Sunday times echo previous remarks by the Hollywood director, regarding what he perceives as the distorted view of figures such as Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin in U.S. media.

Earlier this year, Stone, speaking at the at the Television Critics Association's semi-annual press tour in Pasadena said that "Hitler is an easy scapegoat throughout history and it's been used cheaply."

Gregory Hood, Paul Kersey, and Henry Wolff #racist amren.com

The Great Replacement: Minneapolis

Minneapolis, Minnesota, was almost entirely white until 1980. However, in the last few decades, large numbers of non-whites came to the city, especially immigrants from Somalia. Now, the idyllic city created by settlers and pioneers is a center for black crime and Islamic terrorist recruitment.

The city’s story began when the United States Army built Fort Snelling after the War of 1812 to guard American settlers. The most famous non-white inhabitant of Fort Snelling was Dred Scott, whose efforts to escape slavery led to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford. Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote that blacks were not citizens and “are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the world ‘citizens’ in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States.”

After more settlers came, several local settlements combined. Adolf Hoeffler, a German who visited the area in 1852, predicted it would eventually become “an extensive manufacturing town, and depot of all the future productions of the extreme Upper Mississippi.” Minneapolis was ideally placed for milling flour, not just manufacturing. Its name means “water city.” From 1870 to 1890, Minneapolis grew from 13,000 people to almost 165,000. Almost everyone was white.

Many city leaders wanted to keep it that way. “Restrictive covenants” to keep neighborhoods white were used from 1910 until 1950. The fascist Silver Legion or “Silver Shirts” had a presence in the city in the 1930s. Blacks were simply not a significant presence in the city for most of its history, so ethnic tension was between Jews and gentiles, not blacks and whites. Some help-wanted ads even said, “Gentile preferred.” Minneapolis was a critical battleground for the Progressive movement. The Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party didn’t unite with the Democrats until 1944, and the quasi-socialist MFLP was able to elect candidates such as Minneapolis mayor Thomas Latimer. Class and ideology — not race — dominated city politics.

Non-whites started coming to the city in large numbers in the 1970s and 1980s. By 1990, the city was more than 20 percent non-white. Some migrants may have been tempted by Minnesota’s generous welfare programs. However, there was also a deliberate effort by churches and refugee settlement organizations to bring them. Corporations also wanted cheap labor, such as the meat packers who hired Somalis.

image

A graph showing the white population of Minneapolis falling from 99% a century ago to 60% today.

Organizations such as Lutheran Social Services, Catholic Charities, and World Relief Minnesota have worked with the State Department to settle foreign “refugees.” Many such organizations are essentially funded by the federal government, and have a clear financial interest to importing migrants. Without government, there would not be nearly so much resettlement.

In 2004, Minnesota was the number-one destination for foreign refugees on a per-capita basis. The Hmong began arriving in large numbers after the fall of South Vietnam in 1975. Their numbers are a good example of how military intervention brings foreigners. Beginning with 60 “refugees” in 1976, the Twin Cities region (Minneapolis and St. Paul) eventually “attracted the largest Hmong population in the country.” There are now more than 66,000, which means the area is the largest urban Hmong population in the world. Minneapolis now has Hmong gangs, which occasionally re-enact their tribal conflicts on American streets.

Hispanics have also come. The percentage of Hispanics almost quintupled from 1990 to 2010, rising from 2.14 percent to 10.47 percent.

There is a huge Somali population in Minneapolis: over 125,000. One area is called “Little Mogadishu” and is plagued by gangs. An estimated 23 men from the Twin Cities have joined the Islamic terrorist group al-Shabab since 2007. NPR did a series on “The Somali-Minneapolis Terrorist Axis” in 2009, chronicling many cases of Somali “teens” joining militant groups through an underground recruiting network.

The city accommodates Muslims. Somali businesses are permitted to stay open after regular closing hours during Ramadan. During the current pandemic, the Islamic call-to-prayer sounds in the Cedar-Riverside neighborhood.

Violent crime is overwhelmingly black, but it sometimes spills out of black areas. In 2019, pipe-wielding Somali “youths” attacked people waiting for public transportation. That same year, black mobs attacked citizens, stealing cell phones and valuables. The police claimed that “race has nothing to do with it.”

The pandemic has not stopped the shootings. Someone killed a black “aspiring musician” outside his home on April 9. Less than two weeks later, someone killed Kevin Beasley, the grandson of “veteran peace and civil rights activist Spike Moss.” Mr. Moss called the deaths of young black men “our epidemic before the epidemic.” Beasley had a criminal record and was shot at a “house party,” though Minnesota has been under a “stay-at-home” order since March 25. Earlier this month, someone shot a city councilman’s car full of holes. Last Monday, there was a “rolling gun battle” between people in two cars, resulting in “grave” injuries for a young woman.

Still, majority white Minneapolis is considered a great city – a “miracle,” according to one Atlantic article in 2015. Success has not spread to non-whites. In a remarkable response to the “miracle” article, “Minneapolis’s White Lie,” The Atlantic’s Jessica Nickrand painstakingly listed the racial disparities in Minneapolis. Rates of poverty and educational failure are so high, she compared Minneapolis to Detroit.

Most of the article sounds like something I would write: She cites Minneapolis’s affordable living cost, robust job market, and good schools, calling it “the American Dream.” Of course, she adds, “60 years ago, so was Detroit.” The Twin Cities’ decline may “just come later” because it’s on the same course.

Agreed.

Her conclusion lost me. “For Minneapolis to remain successful,” she wrote, “the progressive policies of the 1960s and 1970s must evolve to reflect the changing population, prioritizing affordable housing, neighborhood integration, and investment in public education and health services.” That, she says, would be the real “miracle.”

Jessica Nickrand rejects the obvious explanation that Detroit collapsed because whites fled. The same is happening to Minneapolis. The programs Miss Nickrand wants haven’t fixed racial disparities in the past and won’t now. “Little Mogadishu” will just get bigger. The miracle we need is whites recognizing what is happening. If that happens, we can stop subsidizing our dispossession.

Prez Jeff Davis #racist therightstuff.biz

[From "Genocide: The Inescapable Conclusion"]

Genocide is just a word invented by a Jew to demonize the Nazis. As a Dixian-American, I feel no particular link to the Nazis, swastikas, Roman salutes, etc. I’m really pretty ambivalent on those things. Whatever. Jean-Marie Le Pen hit the nail on the head when he called the Jew/Gypsy genocide a detail of history. Ethnic cleansing is a universal part of world history. Nations have always had intermittent wars, wherein they killed their enemies. So what? The common pejorative use of the word genocide as something unthinkable is ignorance gone to seed as it elevates losing for your people as somehow morally superior to winning for your people. Meanwhile Jews don’t seem to show any remorse for genociding the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, Jebusites, or the Amalekites.

It is to our peril that we say “I respect nationalism for all peoples.” While we may sometimes be able to strike up treaties and mutually beneficial trade agreements, or the exchange of scholarly research, or a mutualistic white supremacy such as slavery, we must realize that in the big picture human races are indeed biological competitors, that human evolution is a giant tournament with immutable rules that we cannot cancel and in which elimination means racial extinction rather than just failure to win a trophy. There have always been and always will be eliminations. The only thing we have to decide is whether we want our race to continue to the next round at the expense of others or for other races to continue to the next round at the expense of our own. While it is possible some remnant populations may be retained for cheap labor or medical research, the pro-genocide stance is an inescapable conclusion on at least three different grounds:
• competition for resources
• disease control
•• reservoir for existing diseases
•• emerging diseases and antibiotic resistance
•• engineered diseases (biological warfare)
• environmental pollution

[...]

The brown hordes of the world are a reservoir for diseases that we could easily eradicate if we were only willing to eradicate the host population. Rotary club has long worked toward the vision of A Polio Free World, and could have achieved it a long time ago if we would only eliminate the native population of Afghanistan and Pakistan along with some other problem areas. Rotary claims that polio vaccines can be as cheap as $0.60 USD each, but of course these children (that we also pay to feed and vaccinate for other diseases) grow up to bear more children who will also need to be vaccinated and fed. Meanwhile, the going rate for AK-47 ammo is less than $0.30 USD, can be administered at any age, and actually breaks the cycle. With wide scale 3rd world genocides, we could much more easily eradicate polio, measles, mumps, whooping cough, influenza, rubella, zika, malaria, and many other diseases for good.

[...]

It’s important to realize that new diseases and antibiotic resistant strains of microorganisms are continually evolving. For instance, AIDS is not a disease from antiquity, but could have been eradicated before it was even discovered if negroes had been eradicated from Africa as little as 50-100 years ago.

[...]

Most readers are probably already aware that preserving endangered species is a white thing, but perhaps few have realized that third worlders will happily dump durable pollutants into the air and water that will eventually end up in the globally shared seafood supply. Example: DDT was banned from USA in 1972 but is still being found in seafood and still being made and used in India while China only recently stopped manufacturing it. Given that DDT only has a 150 yr half life in water, it is unlikely that India alone is going to doom the world’s oceans with this one chemical, but it demonstrates a problem that is bound to grow as the 3rd world grows. If African countries ever manage to profitably manufacture and use chemicals like this, there is little doubt that they will use them carelessly, just like they mismanage everything else they do. Similar concerns should be expected if any of these countries ever manages to split the atom and generate nuclear wastes.

The inescapable conclusion:
Although deportations and international treaties may mitigate some of the issues listed above, none of them will be fully resolved without implementing the largest genocide the world has seen up to this point. It is my personal opinion that the biggest threat dindu nations pose to whites is through diseases and that peaceful deportations would do little to diminish that threat. I also think that with present trends, it is more likely that the next deadly pandemic will arise naturally from the 3rd world rather than engineered by the Islamic world, however the West’s penchant for affirmative action in education may just educate the right Muslim scientists for the job.

Genocide necessarily involves either suppression of fertility or active or passive killing, or some combination of methods. Passive killing might include the refusal to supply aid such as food or medical care, preferring to just let Nature run her course, or refusal to come to the rescue when brown tribes genocide each other. The passive method would cause greater suffering and would not finish the job, as there will always be a remnant population to rebound in time. Clearly, an active genocide using white man methods would be more humane than passively letting Nature or savage tribes to do a much sloppier and less complete job. In the same way that animal lovers cannot adopt and care for every stray, but must accept that many be euthanized or sterilized, so it must be with the lower races of humanity.

The Bright side:
Extermination of the brown hordes in their homelands could give vast new territories to us. They are ours for the taking. Perhaps some readers wish they could have taken part in the US Homestead acts. Those days do not have to be gone forever. We could gain vast territories and give them away to settlers much like in the old days. We could even form new white countries, and settle much more territory than the entire continental US put together. In Africa, India, and Latin America 100 or even 1,000 acre tracts could be given away to young homesteaders. Or perhaps our governments could just auction parcels of land or mineral rights instead of collecting taxes. It is up to us white men to agree on the justness of our cause, how the spoils will be divided among us, and to go out and conquer and settle like only white men can.

Note: This article is meant to provoke thought and discussion and should be used for informational and educational purposes only. TRS does not support church shootings or any sort of violent or illegal activity of any kind. Support your local Police.

SIMPLE TRUTH #conspiracy lunaticoutpost.com

Prince murdered by illuminati or just a fake death as Bowie? Answer is as simple as this:
What did the illuminati set of tarot cards known as "Daily Mail news" had to say about it ?
Three days before "Prince found dead": "Prince makes surprise appearance at dance event 'to prove he's alive and well' hours after being rushed to hospital"
In other words: no longer need to check the agendas or wait to perform the "public tribute" test.
Illuminati faked Prince«s death, same as as Amy Wneehouse alias Lady Gaga, or countless 2016 exampels, from David Bowie to Viola Beach.

Prince's fake death 2016: Main agenda same as Michael jackson 2009
To set the stage for the mahunt for non.whites and blacks in particular In other words, Prince is in the same cast of black actors where:
- the ethnic indonesian playing suicidde bomber "black Obama" has the leading role;
- other names range from veterans( Al Sharpton to Bill Cosby) to more "dead" (Baltimore "Grey" to Ferguson "Brown")..

Prince and Michael jackson dead: parallel scripts
Prince and Michael Jackson: deaths are not only parallel but also reverse scripts
Both deaths advance the same main agenda, no wonder that both are also staged by the media the same way: as "possibly the greatest ever".

Prince's fake death vs Michael jackson murdered: reverse scripts
When "Prince's wife died at 57", Prince already knew that he was going to also "die at 57, and. same as Cosby, what the main agenda to have him back in the headlines was.
On the other hand Michael jackson didn't know what not only "his doctor Conrad Murray" but also any Jackson family members making headlines after he was sacrificed knew.
In other words: that he would be one of the few illuminati icons murdered by the illuminati.

Prince 2016, Michael Jackson 2009: the flu virus LINK
Why is the gap ias long as 7 years, considering that both acts advance a main agenda that was originally scripted to be completed within two years?
For the same reason that the flu virus had to be renamed a few times: the BIG BANG script had to be postponed again and again since 2009.
Reductionism: this answer also explains why the script has "Prince died with a new flu viirus".
In other words: a secondary agendas include launching yet another "flu virus" psy-op, part of the "super virus pandemic" hoax setting the stage for global vassassination.
Reminder: the stage for global mandatory vaccination was recently renamed from ebola to ZIKA.

How does "dead Prince" advance the race war agenda?
By usimg tje same technique as "Hillary Clinton Benghazi emails" :to suggest the opposite of what is coming or is unfolding.
And that is the best example because there is also a DIRCT link to Hiillary.

Dead Prince, Hillary Clinton, Benghazi emails and NY Primaries: DOUBLE LINLK
1. The timing for Prince's fake death
To divert human cattle from the "results" of the NY primary, the "election" that one day earlier set the impossible milestone for multiplying votes: each Hillary vote was countyed 100 (you read well, ONE HUNDRED) times.

2. "Dead Prince", "Hillary Clinton Benghazi emails": psy-ops based on same technique. .
More precisely to suggest the opposite of what is coming or is unfolding.
- Having the media non-stop repeat that "Prince was a genius" and go as far as have some tell that "Prince was the greatest ever" is part of diverting non-whites and blacks in particular from the coming genocide.
At the same time the pushing the grotesque pf ""Prince superstar" to the limits is also meant to foment racial hatred against blacks.
- "Hillary Clinton Benghazi emails" alias "Clinton under fire" diverts from Clinton's results rigged beyond what human cattle can imagine int their wildest dreams.
Suggesting that "Clinton is about to leave the race in disgrace" is part of having human cattle discard the possibility that "elections" are rigged to have Hitlery win.

Note
18 April 2016 - The Daily Mail was telling the audience what was going to happen:
Prince makes surprise appearance at dance event 'to prove he's alive and well' hours after being rushed to hospital
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/art...pital.html

CONTEXT
Last Prophet's words from Apr 9, 2016
"But the script's real location for this milestone was the "Daily Mail", a "news" outlet that reads like an illuminati set of tarot cards.".
Source:
Illuminati set a milestone video for truth in plain sight about an ongoing genocide together with the "Pope"'s aannouncement of a visit to Lesbos.
The video psy-op, released Apr 6, 2016, is based on suggesting the opposite of what is coming (for non-white EU and US residents and citizens) and is alrady unfolding (for refugees and migrants entering Europe).
Auschwitz before Lesbos and Homos: Satanic Trilogy of genocidal announcements by "Holy Father".
Video "Greece: Refugee children fight barbed-wire with flowers and tears"
http://catholic-church-destruction.blogs...cidal.html

Apr 20, 2016, on Hitler's anniversary: End Times Sign: 3 digits milestone for multiplying votes
New York primaries: Clinton real votes counted 100 times each - milestone for converting real into official results.
Contrast it with Trump's results, generated, by BOTH a multiplier and a divider.
http://illuminati-milestones.blogspot.co...inton.html

BASICS
Fake deaths: what the "public tribute" test is:
If no bufffer between public paying tribute and the open casket then we could exclude a fake death:
As this milestone set in Moscow March 2015 shows, an apparently open casket alone is NOT enough.
http://illuminati-milestones.blogspot.co...-open.html

Fake deaths: contrast David Bowie with Amy Winehouse, Boris Nemtsov and Franklin Roosevelt.
https://lunaticoutpost.com/thread-619611.html

Aug 2014- Ferguson to coming Baltimore riots, "dead" Brown to coming Gray
added Nov 2014: interracial rape culture pause by Bill Cosby
http://ethnic-civil-war.blogspot.com/201...wn-to.html

Avian flu 2006: why super virus pandemic HOAX NOT launched as bovine or swine flu
http://big-lie.blogspot.com/2006/05/avia...ities.html

brianb. #fundie blogger.com

I handed one of Living Waters (Million Dollar) gospel tracts to a drive threw worker the other day while picking up some food for my family. When I pulled up to the window I decided to give her the gospel tract first before giving her my real money. Well she took the tract and before I could get a word out shut the window. She just looked with amazement at the tract for about 10 seconds then she called one of her friends over to check it out. Now I know I should have knocked on the window to let her know it’s not real, but I just had to see how far this would go. The drive threw girl and her friend looked very carefully at the tract and then took out one of those money markers, you know which kind I’m talking about the kind to tell if it’s counterfeit or not. She then walked off which was an attempt to find the manager. I thought to myself, oh no they are going to call the law on me – well if they do I guess I will just have to witness to the authorities.

A minute later the manager came back and opened the window in which she began to tell me, “Uhmm sir, this is not real money and we cannot accept this” which I responded, “Yes I know it’s not real, they do not even make a million dollar bill.”

The manager tried to hand it back, but I told her it was for the girl that was waiting on me. I gave her my real money and we both had a good chuckle. When the drive threw girl handed me my food she was obviously embarrassed. I told her no worries and that she did a wonderful job and gave her a four million dollar tip.

agame020a #conspiracy news.messages.yahoo.com

I have saved NewOrleans, hoping that this can let me have this qualification , asks you to investigate senator Miller , finds out shameless E.T!

Everybody may still remember time of general election of 2004 , Democratic Miller, senator of party membership, said:" Some party groupings will the benefit of party grouping establishment is on national benefit ",etc.. I tell you that words were figured out by me. If you do not believe , Can check Miller with the lie detection appearance . This sentence is not that himself thought of definitely, it was others that told him. I tell you whether what should drive you now. You should be driven by justice! You should be driven by the morals! You should be driven by your conscience! Those ones that do not drive you to kill knowing the sense of honour are an animal!If you continue tracing check Miller with the lie detection appearance, you will find that shameless E.T. I will tell you now , the words that I think are not prepared for this shameless animal of Bush. And let you know , though that shameless E.T often performs its prediction ability in front of people, but the time that it predicts will not exceed one year .

Taiwan leader says on February 16,2006 that they prepare to modify national flag and country name! And,They prepare to rename " JIE SHOU house " as" president residence". Now, I remind you again , see ¡î¡îChinese leader is shameless murderer¡ï¡ï the article!

Hang bush!Hang these grafters !
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's mother prostitution,But he runs to France buys the airplane.The airplane quantity very many but the price have not been few,The sales commission feeds his mother's vagina(Material:This China purchases the French 150 airplanes,Total price 10 billion US dollars,Airplane model including A319, A320, A321.Most expensive A321 retail price is 60 million US dollars.
Before,Wen Jiabao's mother everywhere runs,Because Japanese's airplane throws the bomb)
¡î¡îChinese leader is shameless murderer¡ï¡ï
SARS broke out in December of 2002 in China, but Chinese leader concealed the epidemic situation. Have caused thousands of people's death. Did not announce the epidemic situation until April of 2003. I thought out the method to use protective clothing at this moment. They do not allow me to announce to the outside on breaking my network after knowing. Then take forcible possession of the contribution . These people are a group of shameless murderers! Now, I tell you , if China unifies with the " setting up new national flag , national anthem , national emblem , name of the country , capital , constitution " method , this method was figured out by me! This method is suitable for Korea , S. Korea too. But they use this method, must pass my agreement!Additionally, I hope that South Korean can withdraw army first in America beginning from Iraq.

The unified method of Serbian and dark mountain republic is thought of by me, I have given comment at that time on net , but am deleted by them!They began to follow me in 2001.

¡î¡î¡îDon't believe the ruffian Blair!¡ï¡ï¡ï
because he has no credit to speak . Like Bush, Hu Jintao.To insure own power.Do not hesitate to sacrifice the innocent life! They with E.T along with they the lackey is as , it is being put to torture in the inferno that their final result is sure to.

Mr Mannn #fundie mrmannn.blogspot.com

Like Nazi ghouls, the democrats have leapt upon the corpse of Ted Kennedy and now the plan is called Kennedycare. I have to question the wisdom of naming a health care plan after a guy best known for driving off a bridge.

Sure Lord O claims he is pulling the public option off the table. He'll just rename it and reinsert it back in the bill. Honor and truthfulness were never the strong points of the democrat party. Certainly the rest of the bill is a totalitarian power grab.

The bureaucracy created for this health care bill is far more powerful than it needs to be. It essentially swallows the IRS into its control. It can access and deduct money from your bank account without judicial review. Its exempted from all sorts of laws that protect people from govt abuse. In short, its not a health care bureaucracy when its design is to spy on and punish people for crimes that don't exist.

I've said it before, I'll say it again. This has nothing to do with health care, and everything to do with establishing a dictatorship in the USA. Yes, Obama IS Hitler.

We can't let up the pressure. Pulling the public option does nothing to lessen the threat of this bill. This is a power grab unlike anything I have ever seen. Carter was incompetent. Clinton was corrupt. Obama is like nothing we have ever encountered before. We can lose this country if we do nothing. And I don't say that lightly.

The days are dark and getting darker. I don't think Obama is a specific punishment on America, but we are reaping what we have sown. I think there is still a praying remnant of believers in this country to withhold the Hand Of Judgment. Obama and the democrats are using our freedoms to overthrow democracy.

It will be hard to live under tyranny and remember freedom. Take a stand now or regret it forever.

Emphasis mine.

Colonel-Knight-Rider #fundie deviantart.com

(because child abuse is TOTALLY okay if the parents say you brought it on yourself. Keep in mind CKR wants a family of his own.)

-You think I don’t know that I’m “questioning” my parents by being on social media? Well, duh! Of course, I am! But that doesn’t necessarily mean I’ll abandon all of their teachings. What I didn’t say in the poem I wrote was that I was the source of their acts of physical aggression because I was a disobedient child in those instances. It’s not their fault. It’s mine.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

BREAKING-EARTH CHANGES, FEMA CAMPS,ISIS SPREADING.DISTRACTION!!!

This dude rang the Art bell radio show few years back , he claimed he worked at Area 51 but was discharged for medical reasons

this is what he had to say:

Caller: Hello Art?
(Art:Yes)
Hi...I don"t have a whole of time...um...
(Art:well,look let's begin by finding out whether you're using this line properly or not)

Area 51...I am a former employee
I was let go on a medical discharge about a week ago.
And....and...(sobbing)

I kinda been running across the country...um...um..man...I don't know WHERE to start...

They're...they're..gonna...triangulate on this position really, really soon...

Ok...um...um...Ok...What we're thinking of as Aliens Art,...they're...they're EXTRA-DIMENSIONAL BEINGS...
that an earlier precursor of the SPACE PROGRAM MADE CONTACT WITH..uh...they are NOT what they claim to be...uh...they have INFILTRATED a lot of aspects of the MILITARY ESTABLISHMENT particularly the AREA 51,

...uh...the DISASTERS that are coming...the military....I am sorry...the GOVERNMENT knows about them....and there's a lot of SAFE AREAS in this WORLD THAT THEY COULD BEGIN MOVING THE POPULATION TO... NOW..Art...They are not.

THEY WANT THOSE MAJOR POPULATION CENTERS WIPED OUT...SO THAT THE FEW THAT ARE LEFT WILL BE MORE EASILY CONTROLLABLE.
...sobbing...losing transmission.
losing satellite....i shoul.......Transmission lost.


ART--In some way someone knocked us off the air (backup system now up and running).IN ALL THE YEARS I HAVE NEVER SEEN THE TRANSMITTER massively fail,--KNOCKED THE RADIO STATION OFF THE AIR.

SO does this explain the moon fake photos ---they made contact up their...massive structures can be seen in many photos-points towards some civilization, not human, that may be based there.

Does this explain all the volcanic activity and earthquakes we are experiencing like never before.

Does this explain why governments are not concerned about marine sea-life/bird-life being wiped out by toxins ie core-exit,oil spills, radiation from fukushima, because they know something more is coming.

Does this explain why fema camps are setup all over your country --with railways leading into them, with train carriage/cattle cars built with small windows and shackles fitted to them, to isolate and control the survivors of the coming disasters.

Does this explain Obama sacking an unprecedented number of top ranking military officials during his presidency.

Does this explain why isis was established funded and armed to spread chaos throughout europe with Merkel's /UN blessing

Does this explain why governments are letting isis spread terror throughout the world left unchecked to disrupt/destroy society...kill more people , create more chaos ...as a distraction from WHATS COMING......

ITS BIZARRE but can we afford to not consider the implausible!!

Enochs fire #fundie topix.com

Modern society has often painted Jesus as a very "soft," even effeminate persona. It is certainly true that Jesus teaches us to be followers of peace and to turn the other cheek when we are reviled or insulted (Matthew 5:9, 38-39). However, being a peacemaker is not necessarily the same as being a pacifist. Keep in mind that this is the same Jesus who specifically instructed His followers to buy a sword ( Luke 22:36). In one of His parables, He portrays Himself as a landowner who imposes the death penalty on an unjust servant ( Luke 19:12-27). When He encountered a Roman military leader (Matthew 8:5-10), Jesus did not rebuke him in the least for his military occupation. Instead, He commends the soldier for his great faith, a faith so strong and pure that it put all of Israel to shame. In all of these areas, Jesus' teachings would be considered quite conservative by modern terms.
Yes,
Jesus would have Armed his followers with guns.

Anonymous mother, Judge Kara Pettit, Salt Lake City prosecutors #sexist kutv.com

Judge deals blow to Utah woman charged for being topless at home in front of stepchildren

by Associated Press
Wednesday, January 22nd 2020

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A judge refused to overturn part of Utah's lewdness law Tuesday in a blow to a woman who's fighting criminal charges after her stepchildren saw her topless in her own home.

Judge Kara Pettit sided with prosecutors who argued that lewdness is commonly understood to include women's breasts in American society, the Salt Lake Tribune reported. Judges should not second-guess what lawmakers have decided is lewd conduct, she wrote.

It wasn't immediately clear whether Tilli Buchanan would appeal the ruling. If she does not, her misdemeanor charges would move toward trial. If convicted, she could face jail time and be forced to register as a sex offender for 10 years.

Buchanan and the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah had pointed to a court ruling that overturned a topless ban in Colorado and helped fuel a movement. They said Utah's law on lewdness involving a child is unfair because it treats men and women differently for baring their chests.

A global movement advocating for the rights of women to go topless, called the Free the Nipple campaign, has seen mixed success fighting similar ordinances in other parts of the country.

The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a ruling that blocked a ban in Fort Collins, Colorado, on women going topless in public.

But the U.S. Supreme Court this month left in place the conviction of three members of the Free the Nipple campaign who were arrested for going topless on a New Hampshire beach in 2016.

A public indecency law in Missouri also was upheld in 2017, and a court allowed a San Francisco public nudity ban to remain on the books in 2013.

Buchanan was charged after she and her husband took off their shirts to keep their clothes from getting dirty while they hung drywall in their garage in a Salt Lake City suburb in late 2017 or early 2018.

When her husband's three children, ages 9 through 13, walked in, she "explained she considers herself a feminist and wanted to make a point that everybody should be fine with walking around their house or elsewhere with skin showing," her lawyers said in court documents.

The charges against her were filed after the children's mother reported the incident to child welfare officials working on a separate investigation involving the kids.

Police said Buchanan removed her shirt and bra in front of the children while "under the influence of alcohol." Her husband was not charged.

Bryan Fischer #fundie rightwingwatch.org

On his radio program yesterday, Bryan Fischer made the case that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev should be put to death following his conviction for his role in the Boston Marathon bombing in the most Fischer-esque way possible: explaining that Noah's Flood was the result of society not using the death penalty.

As Fischer explained it, "God had prohibited the death penalty prior to the Flood" and it resulted in so much chaos and bloodshed that God was left with no choice but to kill almost all of mankind.

"When people say we ought to just get rid of the death penalty, we just ought to get rid of capital punishment and society would be so much better off," he said, "well, we tried that; we tried that from the creation to Adam until the Flood ... And what happened? It was chaos. It was vigilante justice. And people began killing other people simply because they got insulted or because they got injured or because they got wounded. So there was no sense of proportionality, justice was a matter of each man talking the law into his own hands. It was total chaos and the result was the entire world had become so corrupt that God had to wipe the whole thing out and start over"

Got Questions #fundie gotquestions.org

Question: "Was the Apostle Paul actually a false prophet?"

Answer: The theory that the apostle Paul was a false prophet and not a true follower of Christ is usually put forth by those of the Hebrew roots movement persuasion, among others. They believe Christians should submit to the Old Testament Law, but Paul clearly disagrees with them, proclaiming that Christians are no longer under the Mosaic Law (Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:23-25; Ephesians 2:15), but the Law of Christ (Galatians 6:2), which is to “love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind…and to love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:37-39). Rather than submitting to God’s Word, the Hebrew roots movement simply dismisses Paul altogether and claims that Paul was a false apostle and that his writings should not be in the Bible.

But Paul’s apostolic authority has been well documented in Scripture, beginning with his dramatic Damascus Road experience which changed him from a Christ-hating persecutor of Christians to the foremost spokesman for the faith. His astonishing change of heart is one of the clearest indications of his anointing by the Lord Jesus Himself.

Tom Tarrants, once labeled “the most dangerous man in Mississippi,” was one of the top men on the FBI’s most wanted list. Tarrants was a member of the Ku Klux Klan and despised African-Americans and Jews, a people he fully believed were God’s enemies and involved in a communist plot against America. Tarrants was responsible for bombing some 30 synagogues, churches and homes. He was so dangerous that the FBI director, J. Edgar Hoover, sent a special team of FBI agents that were used to infiltrate the Russian KGB down into the American South to locate and apprehend Tarrants. They were successful and took Tarrants into custody after a violent shootout. Tarrants received a 30-year sentence in the Mississippi State Penitentiary.

While in prison, Tarrants one day asked for a Bible and began reading it. He got as far as Matthew 16 and was confronted with Jesus’ words: “For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul?” He couldn’t escape the impact of Christ’s statement and got down on his knees in his cell and asked God to deliver him from his sinful life.

Word of Tarrant’s conversion soon began to spread throughout the prison and ultimately made it all the way back to Hoover, who strongly doubted the story. How could such a true change in such a hardened, evil person be validated?

About 2,000 years ago, another man had nearly the identical problem. When the apostle Paul first came to Jerusalem after his conversion to Christianity, he tried to associate with the disciples, but they were all afraid of him and didn’t believe he was a true convert (Acts 9:26) because of his past persecution of Christians. Today, some people feel the same way about Paul. Occasionally, a charge is made that Paul was a Pharisee who tried to corrupt the teachings of Christ and that his writings should have no place in the Bible. This accusation can be put to rest by examining his conversion experience and his adherence to Christ and His teachings.

Paul’s Persecution of Christianity
Paul first appears in Scripture as a witness to the martyrdom of Stephen: “When they had driven him [Stephen] out of the city, they began stoning him; and the witnesses laid aside their robes at the feet of a young man named Saul" (Acts 7:58). “Saul was in hearty agreement with putting him to death” (Acts 8:1). The words “hearty agreement” indicate active approval, not just passive consent. Why would Paul agree with the murder of Stephen?

Paul the Pharisee would have immediately recognized the statement Stephen made right before his death: “Behold, I see the heavens opened up and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God” (Acts 7:56). Stephen’s words repeat the claim Christ made at His trial before the high priest (Mark 14:62). Just as Jesus’ claim resulted in Him being accused of blasphemy, so also these words would bring a murderous response from Saul the Pharisee toward Stephen.

In addition, the term “Son of Man” is filled with significance. It is the last time the term is used in the New Testament and it is the only time in the Gospels and Acts when it is not spoken by Jesus. It shows that Jesus is the Messiah, and it speaks of Christ’s position in the end times as the coming King. It also combines two great Messianic passages: Daniel 7:13-14 and Psalm 110:1. Daniel 7:13-14 emphasizes the universal aspect of Jesus’ rule; that He is not simply a Jewish ruler, but also the Savior of the world. Psalm 110:1 presents the Messiah as being at God’s right hand. Besides stressing power and position, it also shows acceptance.

All these things would have infuriated Saul the Pharisee, who at the time did not possess the true knowledge of Christ. But it would not be long before Saul the Pharisee would become Paul the evangelist for Christ.

The Conversion of Paul
In the three versions of Paul’s conversion (Acts 9:1-9, 22:6-11, 26:9-20), there are repeated elements which appear to be central to his mission and commissioning. First, it marked his conversion to Christianity; second, it constituted his call to be a prophet; and third, it served as his commission to be an apostle. These three points may be broken down into the following, more intimate considerations: (1) Paul was specifically chosen, set aside, and prepared by the Lord for the work that he would do; (2) Paul was sent as a witness to not just the Jews, but the Gentiles as well; (3) Paul’s evangelistic mission would encounter rejection and require suffering; (4) Paul would bring light to people who were born into and currently lived in darkness; (5) Paul would preach repentance was required prior to a person’s acceptance into the Christian faith; (6) Paul’s witness would be grounded in space-time history and be based on his Damascus Road experience—what he had personally seen and heard in a real location that would be known to all who lived in Damascus.

Before Gamaliel’s pupil came to a proper assessment of the ministry entrusted to him by God and the death of Jesus, a revolution had to take place in his life and thought. Paul would later say that he was “apprehended” by Jesus (Philippians 3:12) on the road to Damascus, a term that means to make something one’s own or gain control of someone through pursuit. In Acts 9, we clearly see miracles on display in Paul’s conversion, the point of which were to make clear that God is in control and directing all the events, so that Paul will undertake certain tasks God has in mind, something the former Saul would never have had any intention of doing.

Although there are many observations that can be made about Paul’s Damascus Road conversion, there are two key items of interest. First is the fact that Paul’s life would become centered on Christ after his experience. After his encounter with Jesus, Paul’s understanding of the Messiah had been revolutionized, and it was not long before he is proclaiming, “He [Jesus] is the Son of God” (Acts 9:20).

Second, we note that in Paul’s conversion there are no positive antecedents or precursory events that led him from being a zealous opponent to a fervent proponent of Christ. One minute Paul had been an enemy of Jesus, and the next he had become a captive to the Christ he had once persecuted. Paul says, “By the grace of God, I am what I am” (1 Corinthians 15:10), indicating he was transformed by God, became truly spiritual, and he was one whom Christ possessed and was now a Christ-bearer himself.

After the Damascus experience, Paul first went to Arabia, but whether he actually began his missionary work there is unknown. What is more likely is that he earnestly desired a time of quiet recollection. Then after a short stay in Jerusalem, he worked as a missionary in Syria and Cilicia (that is for the most part in Antioch on the Orontes and in his native city of Tarsus) and after that in company with Barnabas in Cyprus, in Pamphylia, Pisidia, and Lycaonia.

The Love of Paul
Paul, the former cold aggressor and legalist, had now become a person who could write of the key attribute that witnessed above everything else in 1 Corinthians 13 – love for God and those around him. The one who was supremely educated in knowledge had come to the point of saying that knowledge devoid of love only makes one arrogant, but love edifies (1 Corinthians 8:1).

The book of Acts and Paul’s letters testify to a tenderness that had come over the apostle for both the unbelieving world and those inside the Church. As to the latter, in his farewell address to the Ephesian believers in Acts 20, he tells them that “night and day for a period of three years I did not cease to admonish each one with tears” (Acts 20:31). He tells the Galatian believers they are his “little children” (Galatians 4:19). He reminds the Corinthians that whenever they experience pain, he is wounded as well (2 Corinthians 11:29). He speaks of believers in Philippi as “having them in his heart” (Philippians 1:7). He tells the Thessalonian church that he “abounds” in love for them (1 Thessalonians 3:12) and demonstrated that fact by living among them and helping build up a Christian community (cf. 1 Thessalonians 1–2). Repeatedly throughout his writings, Paul reminds his believing readers of his care and love for them.

Paul’s attitude toward unbelievers is one of caring and deep concern as well, with perhaps the clearest example of this being his articulation in the letter to the Romans of the sorrow he felt for his fellow Israelites who had not come to faith in Christ: "I am telling the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience testifies with me in the Holy Spirit, that I have great sorrow and unceasing grief in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh” (Romans 9:1-3).

This type of angst exhibited by Paul for unbelievers was also not restricted to his own nationality, but extended to non-Jews as well. As just one example, when he entered Athens, the text in Acts 17:16 makes clear that Paul was both repulsed and “greatly distressed” over the idolatrous situation the city was in. Yet he deeply cared about God’s rightful place as well as the people who were involved in false worship, and he immediately went about trying to engage the pagan unbelievers in discourse about the gospel which had been entrusted to him (Acts 17:17-34). And at the heart of his message was Jesus.

Paul on Jesus
Some try to argue that the picture Paul paints of Jesus in his Epistles does not match the Christ portrayed in the Gospels. Such a position could not be further from the truth. From Paul’s letters, we learn the following of Jesus:

• He had Jewish ancestry
• He was of Davidic descent
• He was born of a virgin
• He lived under the law
• He had brothers
• He had 12 disciples
• He had a brother named James
• He lived in poverty
• He was humble and meek
• He was abused by the Romans
• He was deity
• He taught on the subject of marriage
• He said to love one’s neighbor
• He spoke of His second coming
• He instituted the Lord’s Supper
• He lived a sinless life
• He died on the cross
• The Jews put Him to death
• He was buried
• He was resurrected
• He is now seated at right hand of God

Beyond these facts is Paul’s testimony that he left everything to follow Christ (the true test of a disciple as outlined by Jesus in Luke 14:26-33). Paul writes, “But whatever things [his Jewish background and benefits that he had just listed] were gain to me, those things I have counted as loss for the sake of Christ. More than that, I count all things to be loss in view of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them but rubbish so that I may gain Christ, and may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own derived from the Law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which comes from God on the basis of faith, that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death; in order that I may attain to the resurrection from the dead" (Philippians 3:7–11).

Paul’s Enemies
Paul’s teachings and proclamation of Jesus were not popular. If the success of an evangelistic mission were to be measured by the amount of opposition, his mission would be regarded as a catastrophic failure. This would be in keeping with Christ’s statement made to Ananias: "For I will show him how much he must suffer for My name’s sake" (Acts 9:16). The book of Acts alone chronicles more than 20 different episodes of rejection and opposition to Paul’s message of salvation. We should also take seriously the litany of opposition and rejection that Paul lays out in 2 Corinthians 11:23-27. In truth, such hostility and dismissal is to be expected, given his audience. A crucified deliverer was to the Greeks an absurd contradiction in terms, just as to Jews a crucified Messiah was a piece of scandalous blasphemy.

Paul’s enemies comprised a trinity. First, there were the spiritual enemies indicated in his writings that he was acutely aware of (e.g. 1 Thessalonians 2:18). Next, there were his already mentioned initial target audience of both Jews and Gentiles, many of whom would mistreat and dismiss him. Lastly came the one that, it could be argued, perhaps caused him the most grief—the early Church itself.

The fact that Paul was seen as strange and questionable, not merely by fellow Jews but also by a number of fellow Jewish Christians, was no doubt hurtful to him. It would be one thing for Paul’s authority and authenticity to be challenged outside the Body of Christ, but inside was a different foe with which he had to wrestle. First Corinthians 9:1-3 is an example: Paul insists to the Church that he was commissioned by Christ (others include Romans 1:5; 1 Corinthians 1:1-2; 2 Corinthians 1:1; Galatians 1:1). Some even believe that 2 Corinthians 11:26 suggests that there was a plot to murder Paul; a plot formed by other Christians.

Such combined opposition—lost humanity, spiritual adversaries, and distrusting brethren—certainly must have caused the apostle to despair at times, with evidence in his writings that he carried out his missionary work with the prospect of martyrdom before his eyes (Philippians 2:17), which ultimately turned out to be true. Paul was beheaded, tradition asserts, under the persecution of Nero near the third milestone on the Ostian Way. Constantine built a small basilica in Paul’s honor by AD 324, which was discovered in 1835 during excavations preceding the erection of the present basilica. On one of the floors was found the inscription PAVLO APOSTOLO MART – “To Paul, apostle and martyr”.

Concluding Thoughts About Paul
So was Paul for real? The evidence from history and from his own writings declares that he was. Paul’s 180 degree turnaround from his Pharisaic life is not disputed by any learned scholar of history, both secular and Christian. The only question is: what caused his about-face? What would cause a very learned Jewish Pharisee to suddenly embrace the very movement he violently opposed and be so committed to it that he would die a martyr’s death?

The answer is contained within Paul’s writings and the book of Acts. In Galatians Paul summarizes his story in this way:

“For you have heard of my former manner of life in Judaism, how I used to persecute the church of God beyond measure and tried to destroy it; and I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my contemporaries among my countrymen, being more extremely zealous for my ancestral traditions. But when God, who had set me apart even from my mother’s womb and called me through His grace, was pleased to reveal His Son in me so that I might preach Him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately consult with flesh and blood, nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me; but I went away to Arabia, and returned once more to Damascus. Then three years later I went up to Jerusalem to become acquainted with Cephas, and stayed with him fifteen days. But I did not see any other of the apostles except James, the Lord’s brother. (Now in what I am writing to you, I assure you before God that I am not lying.) Then I went into the regions of Syria and Cilicia. I was still unknown by sight to the churches of Judea which were in Christ; but only, they kept hearing, ‘He who once persecuted us is now preaching the faith which he once tried to destroy.’ And they were glorifying God because of me" (Galatians 1:13–24).

Paul’s very life testifies to the truthfulness of what happened to him. In that respect, he was very much like Tom Tarrants. A dramatically changed life is hard to argue with. And what finally happened to Tom Tarrants? J. Edgar Hoover wouldn’t believe that Tarrants had actually become a Christian so he sent an FBI agent into the prison disguised as an inmate whose job it was to befriend Tarrants and find out the truth. About a week later, that FBI agent became a Christian and reported back to Hoover that Tarrants indeed was no longer the man he used to be.

A number of people petitioned that Tarrants be released, and eight years into his sentence, Tarrants was paroled and left prison. He went to seminary, earned a doctorate of ministry degree, and went on to serve as president of the C. S. Lewis Institute for 12 years. Currently, he serves as the Institute’s director of ministry.

“You will know them by their fruits" (Matthew 7:16) and the fruits of the apostle Paul leave no doubt that he was very real indeed.

Recommended Resource: Paul: A Man of Grace and Grit by Charles Swindoll

Jim #wingnut #conspiracy blog.jim.com

[From "Color Revolution"]

This blog does not pay much attention to the events of the day, because if you pay too much attention the events of the day you lose track of the long term trend, which has been in a leftist holiness spiral for two centuries, ever holier, ever faster, which unless checked by military dictatorship, ends in infinite leftism in finite time. We had such holiness spirals in the past, many times, and they usually end in disaster, unless terminated early by military dictatorship. Since leftism is inherently destructive, going all the way means total self extermination of the group subject to the left singularity. Sometimes they end in the near total disappearance of the population subject to the holiness spiral as with Szechuan and the Seven Kill Stele, where everyone tortured each other to death for insufficient leftism until there was almost no one left.

But the events of today are a conspicuous new stage in the left singularity, color revolution, which is likely to result in Trump and his family being murdered, or a Trump self coup.

If a left singularity is not halted by strong and harsh dictatorship, with a single man exercising absolute power, it usually ends when the self extermination reaches a point that it profoundly weakens the polity, resulting in foreign conquest, as with Khmer Rouge Cambodia. But sometimes the foreigners sit back and let it go all the way.

Usually that single man ascended to power by being one of the holiest, as with Cromwell and Stalin, and then discovers that suddenly no end of his followers have become even holier than his very holy self, and are demanding greater holiness, which superior holiness might well be implemented by them taking power and him losing power, and them picking up the apples from the applecarts knocked over in the process. He is usually a military man, and therefore turns from those who were loyal to him because of shared faith in the holiness of the synthetic faith based tribe, and instead to those who are loyal to him because they were with him in committing organized violence, and who do not care much about the supposedly shared tenets of the holy faith, turns to those who identify primarily with their band of brothers, rather than the people of the very holy faith. When Cromwell set his troops around to make a problem go away, the person causing the problems found the troops had little interest in discussing the Trinity, the Resurrection and the Incarnation. Stalin relied heavily on the far from communist Beria and on Beria’s apolitical gang.

If Trump halts the left singularity that would be great, because, unlike Cromwell and Stalin, not very holy. Unfortunately, unlike Cromwell, not very military. But though a merchant, Trump has a warrior spirit, and great support among the rank and file at the tip of the spear. He is a man they would like to be able to follow.

The recent rioting was a state sponsored color revolution. Antifa funding and delivering piles of bricks, Antifa paying rioters, which is to say the US permanent government paying, either with Soros as a cutout, or directly. The riots were given cover by Democratic blue state governors and the legacy media (but I repeat myself). When the relatively peaceful mob of plains apes passed an Antifa selected target, white Antifa agents would break windows and start fires. The sound of breaking glass attracted the plains apes into the target, as blood in the water attracts sharks. The Antifa agents would move out as the plains apes moved in, to repeat the operation at another target, while police stood around like potted palms.

Trump tweeted about sending in the military to restore order. The Twitter blue checks laughed. “Empty bluster” they said. “He has not got the power”

What did they mean by that? Legally he has the power, by the constitution and by numerous acts of congress. Presidents have done it before, many times, starting with George Washington, and have done it within living memory, as for example the LA Rodney King riots.

What they meant, or what the handlers writing their scripts meant, is that the permanent government would not let him.

[...]

The usual color revolution is instigated by Soros and the State Department in a foreign country, and color revolution in the US itself may not necessarily follow the same course. In a foreign country, a color revolution stubbornly persists, and when it is not going too well, it becomes more violent and destructive, more and more unpopular, with the hand of the US government more and more visible, with greater and greater direct US military intervention. The US dropped thirty thousand tons of high explosive on Libya. In the US itself, direct military intervention is unlikely to be available, and were the hand of the US government to become unduly visible, as it inevitably will if color revolution continues, criminal and treason charges might well result.

The Republic has been dead for a long time, and its corpse starting to stink, but Trump needs to restore the American Republic the way Augustus restored the Roman Republic. Augustus probably believed he was restoring the Republic, and I expect that Trump will believe it also. Although helicopter trips to the Pacific would be far more satisfactory and effective, rolling up the deep state for perverting the course of justice, treason, and color revolution would likely suffice.

Genetic Code #fundie rr-bb.com

[Fundies have been complaining about Obama fist bumping a gay man.]

Obama isn't just bad...he has a knack for rubbing salt in the wound. I have never heard of a president who berated and insulted the American people like he does. His conduct is bizarre, irresponsible, and reckless.

I'm considering the possibility that this is some sort of psychological attack on the citizenry...with the purpose of demoralizing us? Wanting us to internalize the weakness he projects?...to see ourselves as weak...

I seriously wonder if the U.S. can endure 2 more years of this lunatic. It just keeps getting worse by the day.

Jinglian #fundie en.minghui.org

Falun Dafa has been well known for its extraordinary healing power. In my more than two decades of cultivation, I have witnessed this power over and over again. My mother started practicing Falun Dafa in 1995. She was hit by a car in 2004 when she crossed a street, and was thrown into the air. She landed in front of the wheels. Fortunately, the car stopped just in time.

Master, the founder of Falun Dafa, said:

“All of these kinds of things come to take away one’s life. But one will not be in real danger.” (Zhuan Falun)

My mother had strong righteous thoughts. She got up and said to the driver, “As a Dafa practitioner, I will not cause any problem for you. I know you are in a hurry. You can leave.” However, the driver insisted she have a check up at a hospital. She was told that she had two torn ligaments that needed immediate surgery.

Master said:

“In doing so, we also do not allow it to go astray. If you truly follow the righteous way in cultivation, nobody will dare to do something to you at will. Besides, you have the protection of my fashen, and you will not be in any danger.” (Zhuan Falun)

My mother told the doctor, “I am a practitioner. The wounds will heal once I do the Falun Dafa exercises.” She checked out of the hospital and went home. My mother recovered soon after her return home. Then, she visited the driver to show him that she had recovered. His entire family listened to the facts about Dafa and the persecution. They all quit the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

I was illegally detained in labor camp in 2003 and my mother left home to avoid further persecution. While we were gone, my father was diagnosed with leukemia. My father, at the age of 58, had chemotherapy and other treatments for two years, but his condition worsened. My mother told him that only Falun Dafa could help him recover. With a ray of hope, he started to practice Falun Dafa.

He tossed out all his medication, and quit smoking and drinking. He studied the Fa and practiced the Dafa exercises. He felt better day by day and returned to good health in less than one month. My uncle, who did not believe in the power of Dafa, witnessed my father's recovery. Now he tells everyone that Falun Dafa is good.

When giving birth by a Cesarean section, I had a life and death experience. The doctors could not stop the bleeding and I needed a blood transfusion. However, the blood was not readily available. Although my family was deeply disturbed, my mother decided that only what Master says counts. They asked Master to stop the bleeding. I silently recited “Falun Dafa is Good; Truthfulness-Compassion-Forbearance is Good.” The bleeding stopped.

Master said:

“When disciples have ample righteous thoughts, Master has the power to turn back the tide.”

(“The Master-Disciple Bond” from Hong Yin, Volume II)

Pope Benedict XVI #fundie news.yahoo.com

The pope took his opposition to gay marriage to new heights Friday, denouncing what he described as people manipulating their God-given gender to suit their sexual choices — and destroying the very "essence of the human creature" in the process.

Benedict XVI made the comments in his annual Christmas speech to the Vatican bureaucracy — one of his most important speeches of the year. He dedicated it this year to promoting family values in the face of vocal campaigns in France, the United States, Britain and elsewhere to legalize same-sex marriage.

In his remarks, Benedict quoted the chief rabbi of France, Gilles Bernheim, in saying the campaign for granting gays the right to marry and adopt children was an "attack" on the traditional family made up of a father, mother and children.

"People dispute the idea that they have a nature, given to them by their bodily identity, that serves as a defining element of the human being," he said. "They deny their nature and decide that it is not something previously given to them, but that they make it for themselves."

"The manipulation of nature, which we deplore today where our environment is concerned, now becomes man's fundamental choice where he himself is concerned," he said.

It was the second time in a week that Benedict has taken on the question of gay marriage, which is dividing France after proponents scored big electoral wins in the United States last month. In his recently released annual peace message, Benedict said gay marriage, like abortion and euthanasia, was a threat to world peace.

After the peace message was released last week, gay activists staged a small protest in St. Peter's Square.

Church teaching holds that homosexual acts are "intrinsically disordered," though it stresses that gays should be treated with compassion and dignity. As pope and as head of the Vatican's orthodoxy watchdog before that, Benedict has been a strong enforcer of that teaching: One of the first major documents of his pontificate said men with "deep-seated" homosexual tendencies shouldn't be ordained priests.

[...]

"When freedom to be creative becomes the freedom to create oneself, then necessarily the Maker himself is denied and ultimately man too is stripped of his dignity as a creature of God," Benedict said.

Open Minded #fundie news.bbc.co.uk

(on the subject of laws passed in the Republic of Ireland which make blashpemy punishable by a $35,000 fine:)

The atheists' group should keep there views to themselves. There is no harm in religion - the harm comes when people knock the harmless views of others which allow them to live a relatively peaceful life. So the group should keep their views to themselves - no one is making them go to mass on Sunday or the mosque on Friday or the synagogue on Saturday. Just be considerate of those who choose to.

David J. Stewart #fundie soulwinning.info

The infallible Word of God gives us seven signs of a person who is being influenced by demons. This doesn't mean they are demon-possessed necessarily, but it means that they've opened the door to demons to influence their life:

1. They're fascinated with death. The demon-possessed man dwelt amongst the tombs in the graveyard. Death is a fascination to these people. This is why they listen to Death-Metal music. Why do you think Hollywood loves violence so much? This is why they wear black clothes! This is the Goth culture. Why all the murders and killings? It's because Hollywood is saturated with demons. Thoughts of suicide is a demonic influence, a sure sign that an evil spirit is messing with your life. Abortion is widespread, a result of a fornicating out-of-control lewd society, partying wild and sensual into the night. Murder is everywhere we turn, killing, killing and more killing.

2. They're out of control. Many teenagers nowadays laugh in their parents faces, and are out of control. This is a sign that an evil spirit is at work in a person's life, when they cannot be controlled. Those who are lawless and unable. If your mother and father can't do nothing with you, you need to get on your knees and get right with God, because a demon is working in your life.

3. They get their days and nights mixed up. They want to stay up all night and sleep all day. The demon-possessed man roamed in the caves and mountains, day and night. The wicked party until 5 a.m. and then sleep until 5 p.m. in the evening. Every Rock-N-Roller is like this, staying up to party all night. God made the daylight to work and the nighttime to rest.

4. They cut themselves. Why would anyone want to hurt themselves.? This is a sign of demonic influence. This is what a fool does. Marilyn Manson cuts himself, sucking his own blood in his concerts, ripping apart Bibles and cursing God. Many teens carve the name of their boyfriend or girlfriend in their skin. Tattoos are marks of wordiness, forbidden in the Scriptures. To split one's tongue in half, or pierce their tongue, are insane. To pierce various body parts and inflict permanent marks on their skin is demonic. This is a demonic spirit. The popular series, Jackass, shows young men wounding themselves, hitting their crotch with a sledge hammer, placing hooks in their body, surgically implanting ball-bearings in their head, shaving half their head bald, tattooing their eyeballs. Satan turns people into freaks, weirdoes and punks.

5. They are obsessed with Jesus Christ. This is why they wear crosses around their neck. The demon-possessed man ran and fell at Jesus' feet to worship Him, but it was false worship, mocking the Savior. This is why Satanist, Ozzy Osbourne, wears a cross around his neck. In the Philippines many young men are voluntarily crucified every year, being obsessed with Jesus Christ, thinking that somehow God will be impressed with it. It is blasphemy! Jesus died for our sins! This is why Marilyn Manson rips apart Bibles in concert, being obsessed with Christianity.

6. They wear no clothes. Everybody who goes to spring break in college is hooking up with demons. They go to Florida to take their clothes off and live for Satan. A bathing suit in nothing but colored underwear. If you go out in public like that, it's the Devil making you do it. God doesn't tell you to go out into public naked. God said for you to be clothes in modest apparel (1st Timothy 2:9). Public nudity is a sign of Satanic spirits at work. We live in a world of demonic-influence everywhere we turn. 1st John 5:19 tells us that the whole world lieth in wickedness, but we are of God. 1st John 4:4 tells us that Jesus is greater in us, than Satan is in the world. We are on the winning side in Christ Jesus! MTV, movies and Hollywood are of the Devil.

7. They don't abide in any house. They don't want to live at home. A teenager needs their own apartment like you need 3 more holes in your head. The demon-possessed man dwelt in the wilderness and caves, but wouldn't stay at home. So many teens want to move out and get their own place. They ought to be at home with mom and dad until they find the right Christian man. You let mom and dad pay the bills until you find God's will for your life and get married. Young girls have no business working in a heathen workplace, with all the lesbians, homosexuals and lustful creeps preying upon them.

Chana Levi #fundie aish.com

Years ago if a Jew married a non-Jew, the whole family sat shiva, cried their eyes out and refused to speak to him/her again. Then they realized and acknowledged the true tragedy of intermarriage. Nowadays, when a Jew announces his/her engagement to a non-Jew, the parents meekly accept it. They might even be surprised if their son or daughter did come home with another Jew! Intermarriage today is a spiritual Holocaust and the way we are losing our people is a tragedy. The Nazis tried to destroy us physically, now intermarriage and the 'demoncratic' American way are destroying our people's souls. Few families, even Orthodox ones, are unaffected. One of my first cousins is a non-Jew and my husband, a baal teshuva, is the only
religious member of his entire extended family. Of his ten cousins, half married out. They are all descendants of a great 18th century rabbi from Prague yet they have no knowledge of their amazing heritage and some of their children today are sadly, goyim. Trips to Israel like Birthright are nice and enjoyable but they are just a bandaid on a life-threatening, gushing wound.
Only a true, intense Jewish education and active outreach programs on every U.S. campus and community might have an impact.

Rep. Tommy Benton (R-Jefferson) #racist investigations.blog.ajc.com

In a brief statement, Rep. Tommy Benton, R-Jefferson, said he has pulled his name from three pieces of controversial legislation after his comments about slavery, the Ku Klux Klan and the Civil War drew national attention.

At the same time, Benton did not apologize or retract his statements and he will apparently retain his chairmanship of the House Committee on Human Relations and Aging.

“It was not my intention to create a situation whereby my comments would create a negative perception,” Benton said in a brief statement issued Monday afternoon. “Therefore, today I am withdrawing my sponsorship of HB 854, HB 855 and HR 1179 to allow the business of the House to move forward in an orderly manner.”


House Speaker David Ralston, who had been called upon to remove Benton’s chairmanship, issued a simultaneous statement rebuking Benton for his remarks but allowing the five-term Republican to retain his committee position.

“I condemn commentary that would seek to reverse the progress that we have made in the last century and a half,” Ralston, R-Blue Ridge, said. “While we are mindful of our history, the business of the General Assembly isn’t in rewriting or reinterpreting the past, but rather to focus on improving Georgia’s future.”

Benton introduced the bills last week. House Bill 855 would force the state to formally recognize Confederate Memorial Day and Robert E. Lee’s birthday as public holidays. House Resolution 1179 calls for a constitutional amendment protecting Stone Mountain as a Confederate memorial.

Both of those bills have co-sponsors, but a House staffer said those members intended to pull their names from the measures, effectively killing them. House Ethics Chairman Joe Wilkinson, R-Sandy Springs, asked his name to be removed from the last week following Benton’s remarks.

House Bill 854 would require street names changed since 1968 to revert back to their former names if their prior name had honored a veteran. Although the bill does not mention Martin Luther King, the civil right leader was assassinated in 1968 and the bill would rename a portion of Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard in Atlanta Gordon Road, in honor of Confederate Gen. John B. Gordon, an early leader of the Georgia Klan.

That bill has no co-sponsor, so Benton’s action is all that is needed to kill it.

In speaking to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution last week about the bills, Benton called attempts to bring down or alter Confederate memorials “cultural terrorism” and said the Ku Klux Klan “made a lot of people straighten up.”

The Klan “was not so much a racist thing but a vigilante thing to keep law and order,” he said. “I’m not saying what they did was right. It’s just the way things were.”

Ben Thomas & Spike's Tactical #fundie orlandosentinel.com

gun business in Apopka is drawing fire from Muslims.

Spike's Tactical is marketing an assault rifle it claims was "designed to never be used by Muslim terrorists." The AR-15 assault rifle is laser-etched on one side with a Knights Templar Long Cross – a symbol of the Christian Crusades to reclaim the Holy Land from Muslims – and Psalm 144:1 on the other side: "Blessed be the Lord my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle."

The company's spokesman, former Navy SEAL Ben "Mookie" Thomas said he came up with the idea and believes no devout Muslim would touch such a weapon.

"Off the cuff I said I'd like to have a gun that if a Muslim terrorist picked it up a bolt of lightning would hit and knock him dead," Thomas said.

...The owners of Spike Tactical did not intend to insult or antagonize Muslims, Thomas said. They believe America and much of the world is threatened by Islamic terrorism and the Crusader is a symbol of shared Christian values and the right to defend themselves, he said. The safety selector that controls the Crusader's trigger has three settings: Peace, War and God Wills It.

CH #racist heartiste.wordpress.com

The shitlib demand for Whites Doing Bad Things greatly exceeds the supply.

The shitlib demand for Vibrancy Doing Good Things greatly exceeds the supply.

At the intersection of these market realities, shitlib mendacity crashes into shitlib insanity.

I came to this formulation about how the Virtue Sniveling Market governs shitlib behavior after reading Moses’ comment on the “Shitlib Ego” post:

" CH: “The lesson: never give the Left an inch. They’ll take a parsec. Confederate statues today, books authored by White men tomorrow, until it finally reaches end game: second class status for all Whites outside of a few Acela elites who sufficiently grovel at the altar of anti-Whitism.”

This can not be emphasized enough.

No matter what shitlibs do, it will NEVER be enough for them. Their whole belief system is built on lies. They MUST HAVE an oppressive enemy to keep their believe system from crashing down.

Today it’s confederate statues. Tomorrow it’s removal of any Great White Man from any place of honor in our society — Jefferson and Washington removed from currency (gasp, slave holders!), schools renamed, shaming of White children, it goes on and on.

Demand for “evil whitey” far outstrips supply. So they manufacture more. Like a fire, it simply will not stop and will grow until the fuel is exhausted.

I’m running out of hope.

They absolutely cannot be reasoned with. It leaves violence, and violence only, as the unavoidable end-game. It will be violence from based White Men or violence from Islamics, but violence all the same."

The major limitation of the Virtue Sniveling Market, at least from the perspective of shitlibs who love to never practice what they preach, is that the kind of virtue shitlibs want — Vibrant Virtue — is scarce, while the kind of vice that shitlibs want to snivel against — White Vice — is as scarce as virtue is among Vibrants.

So, as Moses correctly states, shitlibs will manufacture Evil Whitey lies from whole cloth, while simultaneously excusing the worst predations of nonWhites as the consequence of conveniently hidden Evil Whitey forces. Since lies are the coin of the shitlib realm, there is simply no internal brake on their agenda, no end to their game that doesn’t feature war by whatever means and either the eventual subjugation and destruction of White Civ or the total and complete ousting of shitlibs from positions of power and influence.

Unfortunately, since shitlibs have at the moment no real pushback from anyone in power, (the alt-right is effective but don’t mistake that for institutional power), the likelihood of war in the not-so-distant future, maybe even a real hot war, between rival White factions — between say localist Whites and globalist Whites — is greater than it otherwise would be.

It all comes back to Leftoid Equalist lies about race and sex, and the pacified cowards who abet their lies.

As long as cucks/the controlled opposition refuse to grapple with the reality of race and sex differences and everything downstream from those, the Globohomo Bathhouse Alliance will continue winning the rhetoric war, even if a million nail bombs go off in every city of the West and welfare-incentivized dysgenic breeding rots the edifice from within.

The Alt/Maul/Balls-Right, far from being the dire threat to civilized society the Mendacity Merchants would have you believe, are a last gasp salvation for the West and call to redemption for the cucks who have betrayed their claimed principles every step of the way. Appeasing milksops will never find their own way, but stronger harder men can inspire them to break out of their vaginal prisons.

As Trump might say, only losers snivel for virtue whoring status points.

Monica #fundie lifewithgrace.net

Annie Laurie and I were both hit to the core by the quote itself, but when we made the discovery that the Lord revealed the same quote to each of us; (one that is by no means popular or cliché) we were both breathless! God was telling us both that He is HUGE, and He is knocking us about to make room for himself to fill us up.
I am reminded of Isaiah 6 when he says: “I saw the Lord seated on a throne, high and exalted, and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him were seraphs, each with six wings: With two wings they covered their faces, with two they covered their feet, and with two they were flying. And they were calling to one another: “Holy, holy, holy is the LORD Almighty; the whole earth is full of his glory.” These illustrations just moved to prove how this is no one-dimensional God… The train of His robes FILLS the temple! The Earth is FILLED with His Glory! No- he is not one-dimensional— the word I would use is EPIC! The more I see that, the more I want to have one Epic encounter with Him after another! I want the rich robes of His love and Glory to spill out of all my heart, my soul, my mind and my strength. I want to love Him with all of me!
When I love Him with ALL of me, and allow Him come and take up residence in all those spaces it means He will make further renovations to expand those spaces. When He moves in to fill and expand those spaces I can begin explore the heights and depths of His love for me. Like the fairy tale adventurer, I can get lost in the halls of His palace— the one He is building in my heart, mind, soul and strength— with His unfathomable love and care. And so can you!
But you see, because He is not just one-dimension, as you explore the majesty of His palace, you walk by a window and peer outside. What do you see? A vast expanse of more! His love is on the inside and the outside! And its beckoning you to explore more! That “more” is right where you are now…. Here is the call to come with me on the Epic Expedition to take in the “Extravagant dimensions of Christ’s love. Reach out and experience its breadth! Test is length! Plumb the depths! Rise to the heights!” (Ephesians 3:18, MSG) Let’s Go Exploring!

Coronavirus Coach #quack #conspiracy #dunning-kruger themillenniumreport.com

Chemical Off-gassing
Those who are manifesting COVID-19 symptoms have a greater need for fresh clean air. Because of the various respiratory illnesses associated with Coronavirus syndrome they require prana-filled air more than anything. So do folks who want to prevent catching the coronavirus.

However, when wearing a synthetic mask the person is filtering their air through a synthetic material that outgases the petrochemically derived constituents that most are made of. The masked individual is then breathing in those aerosolized toxic chemicals.

Many of the sickest COVID patients already have various respiratory illnesses and/or chemical sensitivities, so putting a mask on them is the worst thing that can be done. The same applies to people who are relatively healthy but have E.I. syndrome or MCS.*

*E.I. Syndrome = Environmental Illness Syndrome; MCS = Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
Brand new products just taken out of a box are notorious for outgassing various chemical toxins. Many of the highest rated masks even off-gas noxious VOCs (volatile organic compounds) because the optimal filtration structure requires such a matrix of chemical compounds. In the case of a new mask, which is placed right over the mouth and nose, these vaporized chemicals go right into both airways.

Therefore, patients stricken with the novel coronavirus ought to be spared from such a misguided practice. A chemical overwhelm can even trigger a respiratory condition that compels the attending physician to put the patient on a ventilator which ought to be strictly avoided for COVID-19 patients.

CAVEAT from the Coach: The olfactory nerve lacks a true blood-brain barrier which is acknowledged to be 8 cells thick. There are only 4 to 6 cells surrounding the olfactory nerve making it a much more vulnerable area for vaporized chemicals to enter the brain. Hence, when a COVID-19 patient is breathing all their air through a toxic mask for weeks or months, they are inevitably experiencing an influx of harmful toxins into their brain tissue. Depending on the age, overall health and sensitivity of the individual, this predicament can produce its own set of concerning neurological symptoms.

Oxygen & Carbon Dioxide
With each and every in-breath, the sick individual is also intaking some of the carbon dioxide they just exhaled.

Instead of breathing in fresh clean air full of oxygen, the mask is diminishing their oxygen intake and replacing it with the respiratory waste product—carbon dioxide.

By subtly decreasing their oxygen levels in this manner they are being deprived of the most powerful healing agent for respiratory diseases—Molecular oxygen (O2).

Furthermore, even a slight increase of the carbon dioxide levels in their bloodstream can contribute to anxiety and feelings of nervousness as well as cause headaches, dizziness and fatigue.

The flip side of the very same problem is that prolonged mask wearing can lead to oxygen deprivation also known as hypoxia. See: Physician Warns About Prolonged Mask Wearing and Hypoxia

For these reasons especially, both the healthy and the ill should avoid wearing a mask like the plague … … … otherwise you may end up getting this coronavirus plague.

Unhygienic and Unsanitary
Even after wearing a mask for a short period of time it becomes filthy. The more polluted the indoor and/or outdoor ambient air is, the quicker the mask will become contaminated.

Not only is the mask capturing particulate and chemical pollution from the ambient air, the accumulation of these throughout the course of a day further obstructs the necessary breathing process.

Hence, the longer a mask is worn in a polluted environment, the dirtier and more contaminated it will become. Just take a close look at the return air filter in your home or garage if you want to see what’s happening with a well-worn mask; albeit, on a much smaller scale.

Now let’s add into the mix the constant coughing and sneezing and spitting up phlegm and mucus. What will inevitably develop regarding the mask is a worst-case scenario that can push the patient onto a ventilator. This is only one reason so many hospital inpatients are being vented; the inappropriate treatment plans also include specific pharmaceutical drugs that are strongly contraindicated for Coronavirus syndrome.

KEY POINT: Venting COVID-19 patients has proven to be injurious to the lungs and often deadly, as several doctors and nurses have testified. Five medical school professors in Italy have also correctly pointed out the extreme risks of ventilators in this scientific research paper: Covid-19 Does Not Lead to a “Typical” Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Damage the Immune System
The following excerpt was taken from this article published by the Alachua Chronicle in Gainesville, Florida: Face masks can damage the immune system.

Stress can lower Your immunity. A face-covering or mask that interferes with respiration can add to stress. Cortisol is a hormone closely linked with stress. It works as a key player in the body’s stress response and is often measured in research as an indicator of stress.

Cortisol plays a vital role in the body’s functioning; it’s secreted by the kidney’s adrenal glands. But high and sustained blood levels of cortisone in individuals stressed by the fear of COVID-19 can trigger serious and emergent health issues.

Higher and more prolonged levels of cortisol in the bloodstream (such as those associated with chronic stress) have been shown to have negative effects, such as:

Impaired cognitive performance
Suppressed thyroid function
Blood sugar imbalances such as hyperglycemia
Decreased bone density
Decrease in muscle tissue
Higher blood pressure
Lowered immunity and inflammatory responses in the body, slowed wound healing, and other health consequences
Increased abdominal fat, which is associated with a greater amount of health problems than fat deposited in other areas of the body. Some of the health problems associated with increased stomach fat are heart attacks, strokes, developing metabolic syndrome, higher levels of “bad” cholesterol (LDL) and lower levels of “good” cholesterol (HDL), which can lead to other health problems.

Dr. Elmer Towns #fundie biblesprout.com

The Crucifixion was Necessary

The crucifixion of Jesus Christ was good for us in that God in His great love and mercy offers through Jesus and His death for our sins the forgiveness of sins and the gift of everlasting life.

The crucifixion of Jesus was evil on the part of all of us whose sins caused Jesus to be crucified. Your sins and mine drove those nails through His hands and feet, put that crown of thorns upon His brow, drove that spear into His side, and all of the other awful things done to Jesus at Calvary.

So, the crucifixion of Jesus is good for us, but was bad because we were the ones who caused Him to go to the cross. Thank God His great love overcomes all the bad for every person who repents of his sins and turns to Jesus.

In Philippians 2:5-7 we see that Jesus, as God, took upon Himself “the likeness of men.” Thus, Jesus became the one and only “God-man,” He was totally God and totally man at the same time. This is called the Hypostatic Union and is difficult to understand. But Jesus Christ, as the God-man died on the cross for our sins.

So, God the Son did die for sinners. It had to be this way because Jesus has always been God and always will be God. He could not have put away His deity to die on the cross even if He wanted to, because He is God. And He had to die as God, being perfect, to be a satisfactory sacrifice for us in the eyes of God the Father.

Jesus Christ also died as a man. This identified Him with all of us in the human race. He was “made in the likeness of men” (Philippians 2:7) and therefore, He could be tempted in all things as we are and remain sinless (Hebrews 4:15). We praise God for this wonderful truth. Jesus Christ is now our high priest who can sympathize with our weaknesses, because He knows exactly what we are going through.

God the Son is a person and as a person He died as God and as man He bore our punishment. Isaiah 53:5 says, “He was wounded for our transgressions: he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon Him; and with His stripes we are healed.”

In this chastisement Christ experienced what no other man has ever experienced. He became sin, taking on Himself our sins. And when He took upon Himself our sin on the cross, God the Father had to turn His back on God the Son, because of our sin which He had taken upon Himself. Thus Christ suffered the awful punishment of separation from God the Father at that time.

Matt Forney #fundie mattforney.com

[A transcript of Matt Forney's speech at the recent Identitarian Ideas IX conference]

I don’t think I need to remind anyone that the election of President Donald Trump was a turning point in American and European history. For our entire lives, our overlords in the government and media have told us that we were on the losing side of history. That we were destined to fail. That the future of our civilization was rainbows, unicorns and chocolate chip cookies, fruits Frenching their boyfriends in front of empty churches, neon-lit mosques eclipsing the cities our forefathers labored to build, and finally, being finessed out of our neighborhoods by swarthy foreigners who stare at our sisters, wives and girlfriends the way lions stare at gazelles.

But for now, the arc of the moral universe has been redirected.

The arc of the political universe has also been redirected. One of the most important achievements of the past two years has been the total destruction of the mainstream American right-wing. My friend Edwin Oslan calls them “Conservatism, Inc.,” the alt-right calls them “cuckservatives,” but regardless of how we abuse them, they were the primary impediment to real, nationalist change in the West. It is they, not the left, who are the biggest losers in the age of Trump. Right now, the left is so excited about the prospect of “resisting” the President that they almost seem sexually aroused by it. It’s your National Reviews, your Weekly Standards, your Rick Wilsons and Rich Lowrys and rich finks in general who have lost everything in the God-Emperor’s ascent.

I’m not just talking about the neocons, the loudest, yappiest poodles echoing in the cuckservative kennel. There’s a whole world of inanity beyond the armchair quarterbacking of soft, pudgy Manhattan intellectuals renaming French fries to “freedom fries” or calling on poor men’s sons to fight their wars for them. Mr. Trump has helped sledgehammer the foundations of American cuckservatism, and we are now dancing among the ruins.

A common refrain during the election was that Donald Trump was not a “true” conservative. The myth of the post-National Review right-wing in America is that the United States was intended to be a different society than the nations of Europe, one bound not by blood and soil but by the liberties granted by the Constitution: the proposition nation. In the minds of the geldings who believe this myth, such as, for example, the guy at CPAC who denounced us as “left-wing fascists” a couple of days ago, Trump and the alternative right are a rejection of these core American values, a return to the bad old days of European nationalism, endless war and diminutive Austrian men with funny mustaches.

The problem with myths is that they have a bad habit of being false. The proposition nation so beloved of William F. Buckley and Norman Podhoretz is nothing but Saran wrap stretched over the casserole of white America. While it’s true that the Constitution represented a break from the European tradition of monarchy, the ideals that fueled the American Revolution were derived from Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and implemented by Americans of European descent. Without Europe’s peoples or its philosophies, there is no Constitution, there is no right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and there is no United States of America.

The “golden age” of immigration to Ellis Island, so beloved of cucks and leftists and a fundamental underpinning of the proposition nation myth, is itself a crock of garbage. As Jim Goad detailed in his book The Redneck Manifesto, during the 19th century, corporations lobbied the U.S. government to bring in Italians, Chinese and other foreigners to break the backs of labor unions and lower wages for the average worker. The lie that immigrants do the jobs that Americans don’t want to do has a far longer history than you think.

But myths cannot take root unless they contain some truth. You may not believe that Jesus Christ died for your sins, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the Romans didn’t nail him to the cross. Similarly, while the U.S. is hardly a proposition nation, bound together only by the Bill of Rights, its history as a colonial state has kept white Americans from forming a cohesive, rooted culture.

Rare are the Americans who are so attached to their hometowns that they don’t want to leave them. Packing your bags and moving to another state, even if it’s on the other side of the country, is as American a tradition as sportsball and diabetes. From the settlement of Jamestown and the landing at Plymouth Rock to the Louisiana Purchase to the California gold rush to the rise of the Sun Belt in the 1950’s and sixties, if white Americans didn’t like where they were, they went somewhere else. I know that when I was a kid, I dreamt of nothing more than getting out of my hometown of Syracuse, New York, that decaying Rust Belt ghetto midway between New York City and Toronto.

People who are constantly moving from point A to point B cannot put down roots and develop a sense of self. In fact, recent scientific research has shown that the brains of those who live in the same place their entire life develop far differently than those who migrate to new locales. White Americans never developed a unified sense of who they are because they’ve never stayed in one place long enough for the question to come up. And that’s before we get into mass immigration, media propaganda and the other myriad ways that cultural Marxists have tried to destroy the spirits of white Americans.

Now, we do have strong regional identities: as explained in the book Albion’s Seed, the United States was settled by four distinct groups from the British Isles, and our politics and culture is in many ways a continuation of the struggle between the Cavaliers and the Roundheads during the English Civil War. But no singular white consciousness has ever existed in the U.S. Ask a Swede, a Pole, or a Hungarian who he is and what his nation means to him, and you’ll get concrete answers rooted in cultural memory going back centuries. Ask the same question of an American and you’ll quickly find out that there’s no “there” there. At the moment, mindless consumerism is the only duct tape holding the U.S. together.

So, yes, the cucks have—had—a glimmer of a point: as a settler state of European mutts, the U.S. was not merely an extension of its fatherland. But that has come to an end, not because of Donald Trump or the alt-right, but ultimately because of the left themselves.

Years ago, when I was skeptical of white advocates and tribalism, I wrote on my old blog In Mala Fide that a political movement like the alt-right would never work because whites in the U.S. don’t define themselves by their whiteness, unlike blacks. A reader of mine interjected by saying that whites have already been defined as white, in the negative, by the left. And he was right.

To be white is to be the world’s whipping boy. It means being blamed for everything from poverty in Africa to environmental degradation to women not having enough space to sit down on the subway. It means being told to shut up and sit down, that your opinion is worthless because of your “privilege,” and that the eventual disappearance of your people and culture is a sign of progress.

To be white, straight and a man is even worse, because you’re told that your natural masculine instincts, your natural desires to bed and wed women make you an oppressive misogynist. In 21st Century Parody World, six-year olds are allowed to take dangerous hormones so they can become a funhouse mirror version of the opposite sex, but not asking your wife for permission before you kiss her can land you in prison for rape. And if you’re not happy with this arrangement, you’re expected to sate yourself with degenerate Japanese cartoons and pornography, the bread and circuses of the globalist empire. That’s how mad the Marxists are: they don’t merely want to destroy our culture and identity; they want to destroy the very things that make us human.

Sun Tzu stated that when you have surrounded your enemy, you must give him a way to escape, or else he will fight you to the death, having nothing to lose. The left never learned that lesson, because they’ve pursued whites—white men—everywhere they’ve gone, leaving them no quarter and no place to call their own. Even video games, long the province of virginal nerds, were not safe, which is what sparked the GamerGate movement three years ago, the first successful backlash against cultural Marxism in most of our lifetimes. The white men of gaming saw leftists trying to subvert their favorite hobby, one they retreated to after society rejected them, and said no more. Enough. This line you shall not cross.

It was this spark that ignited the pile of TNT that was the Trump campaign and the alternative right. The average Trump voter isn’t explicitly aware of all the issues that we are versed in. They don’t know everything that we know. But they know, deep down, that something is wrong. They know that fifty years of mass non-white immigration and globalist free trade have ruined them financially and placed their lives and that of their children in peril. And they see, day in and day out, the chattering classes tell them that they are the problem. They see liberal arts dilettantes in Brooklyn brownstones, rent paid courtesy of Daddy’s credit line, banging out “thinkpieces” every day claiming that all the world’s ills are thanks to those stupid white rednecks in Kentucky, Michigan or Pennsylvania, and as soon as they kick the bucket and give way to all these newcomers from Mexico, we’ll be all better off.

White Americans saw this repulsive display and they said no more. Enough. This line you shall not cross. And they turned out to support a champion who would fight for them. Donald Trump is the first politician in years who treats white Americans as a group with interests of their own, interests that are worth defending. While he is far from the alt-right ideologically, Trump’s nationalist presidency is aiding the maturation of white America from an empty, consumerist frontier into a people with an identity of their own, one that runs deeper than pop culture effluvia and waxing autistic about “muh Constitution.”

I’ll end with an interesting anecdote.

Over the past few years, I’ve noticed an increasing number of houses in upstate New York flying Confederate flags. Seems absurd on the face of it. Why are white New Yorkers adorning their homes with the flag flown by the Southern rebels that their ancestors fought in the Civil War? After all, you don’t see many Poles flying the Hammer and Sickle, or many Koreans paying obeisance to the emperor of Japan. Then it hit me: the U.S. has become so deracinated and so debauched that rural Northern whites are reaching for any emblem of culture that they can get their hands on, anything that they can call theirs.

To the cultural Marxists, the Confederate flag represents white America, the white America they seek to destroy and replace with foreigners, a symbol that drives them insane with hatred. To rural whites across the U.S., lambasted as the embodiment of everything wrong with the world, the Confederate flag is a gesture of defiance to those who would see them dead and buried. A symbol of implicit white identity, transcending the petty regional differences between North and South, united against the forces of globalism, multiculturalism, and degeneracy.

None of us can say for certain whether this a struggle our people will win. But I can say this: we will not lie down and die either. Regardless of how the next eight years play out, the dragon of white identity has been roused from his slumber, and he’s not going back to bed anytime soon.

As my friend the Bechtloff says, I’ve made my peace with God. Let’s dance.

Thank you.

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

[Reminder that the subtitle in the blog header is "Liberty in an unfree world"]

Liberty allows and encourages the highest human flourishing. But when your enemies seek your destruction, it is time for liberty to go.

The time approaches for the warrior ethic, wherein the highest good is to crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women.

It takes two to keep the peace, only one to start war. Every time that Muslims drive a truck into a bunch of Christians, or Black Lives Matter ethnically cleanses the neighborhood of whites and burns down a shopping center, people start panicking “Oh, the terrible white backlash is forcing Muslims and blacks to become radicals.”, though no one has seen any white backlash yet.

The way to respond to war, is with war. History shows us that only war works.

Let us try massacring some peaceful Muslim men and enslaving their women, and see what the effect is on Muslim radicalism. Let us try reenslaving those blacks that are causing the most problems. That would be backlash.

For liberty to exist, there must first be law. For law to exist, there must first be order. For order to exist, there must first be peace. For peace to exist, there must first be victory. And victory usually requires the most horrifying means.

Submitting to your enemy’s war making is not liberty, nor order, nor is it peace.

It is been too long since the last war, people have forgotten how terrible war is, and our enemies have become too used to easy victories, where they make war unopposed, and this war making is answered by generous concessions, which necessarily leads to more extreme war making by our enemies. The only way to real peace, is now through real war.

mumblypeg #fundie freerepublic.com

Funny that it’s always the MTFs (deranged men pretending to be women) wanting to go into ladies rooms.
FTMs (girls pretending to be boys) demanding to be allowed access to urinals? Not so much.
There’s a reason for this. FTMs are less likely to get surgery and more likely to revert to just being lesbians. IOW lesbians KNOW they are really women and don’t want to risk being RAPED in the men’s room.

Business people know they are being set up for valid lawsuits should a woman be raped on their premises as a result of compliance, as well as orchestrated law fare from the tranny activists for failure to comply. It’s a no win situation for business owners, and they’re screaming about it.
And state lawmakers’ inner “duh!” is finally beginning to kick in.

DoctorDoom #fundie libertydwells.com

In politics, success is a result of attacking your opponents mercilessly, knocking them on their asses, ripping their fucking throats out, and pissing on the gaping wounds as they lay dying. There's a word for politicians who are hesitant to go for the jugular: losers.

We know what the leftists are. We know that wanting to be liked by them is futile. We know that they will always hate our guts, and that they will try to destroy us at every opportunity. And we know that in the real world, they will win when our side extends the hand to them without the fingers wrapped around the hilt of a broadsword.

When the RATS are lying in pools of their own political blood, the Pubs will have learned how to win elections.

InChristAlone #fundie rr-bb.com

I worked as a hospice nurse for 12 years, and these accounts are accurate. It was an awesome privilege. I remember one experience that was not so awesome. A man who was known for being mean to his neighbors and then mean to our staff was sent to the ER for severe agitation during the last hours of his death. Hospice deaths are usually very peaceful, but he thrashed around that bed until the staff had no choice but to "knock him out" with morphine. We wondered if he caught a glimpse of where he was going.

ElijahFalling #fundie christianforums.com

18-Year Old Boy Thrown Into The Lake of Fire

[BOCA RATON, Fla., Oct. 2 (UPI) -- Derek Brandon Jacobs, one of the first people in the world to bear an identification microchip, has died at 18 in a Florida motorcycle accident.

Jacobs -- a computer prodigy who gained worldwide attention when he and his parents appeared on NBC's "Today" show after being implanted with VeriChip identification tags -- died Saturday after losing control of his motorcycle in Boca Raton, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported Monday.]

Let this be a reminder to all those who are thinking about taking the MARK OF SATAN. Death can come knocking at your door any day. Take the mark of the beast and you will for sure be thrown into the lake of fire.

unclegeek1 #fundie wnd.com

in my door knocking and other conversations with those who aren't as educated as WND readers I **ALWAYS** win the abortion debate.

How and why? back in the spring of 09 supreme court ginsburg made the (shortened) quote that:
'the purpose of abortion is to control the population of the races we don't want too many of'
It makes it impossible to support abortion without playing the race card.
It brings it home what abourtion is.
I won a state election going door to door repeating that and handing out info on where to find the links.
WND educated me on lwhat abortion really is and even they don't know it-until now- WND for 2 years split the oregon state house in half.
**USE THE RIGHT TOOL FOR THE JOB PEOPLE** the work is a lot easier that way.
happy rino hunting in 2014!!!!

Wayne Allyn Root #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Right-wing commentator, conspiracy theorist and Donald Trump–obsessed sycophant Wayne Allyn Root unleashed a rant on his radio broadcast on Monday in which he vowed that he and his fellow Trump supporters will destroy the NFL and its commissioner, Roger Goodell, for allowing players to kneel in protest during the national anthem.

“The rebels with the pitchforks are back and we’re going to drive the NFL to its knees,” Root declared. “Boycott the NFL and demand the firing of Charles Goodell’s little goody-two-shoes spoiled brat son, Roger Go-To-Hell.”

“Roger, bye bye,” Root taunted. “We’re bringing you to your knees and we’re taking out the NFL.”

Root promised to wage a relentless war against the NFL for allowing players to “kneel and disrespect my flag and my country” and “disrespect vets, and disrespect cops, and disrespect active military.”

“Your dad was a putz and you, my friend, are a putz, Roger Go-To-Hell,” he continued. “Goodbye, Roger. We’re driving you out and we’re going to bankrupt the NFL for the next two weeks and prove, with specific action, that 63 million Trump voters have the power to take a business that disrespects us … and knock them down.”

“We’re going to war, baby,” Root boasted, “and Trump and us are winning.”