Similar posts

Cowboy #conspiracy nodisinfo.com

Rudulf, listen things about the moon landing never made sense to me like the crappy Footage yet I never really researched it. Like the tiny Capsule leaving the moon & flying back to earth. The extreme heat & cold of the moon. How the large car fit into the tiny capsule with the men. I mean actually I did read all my encyclopedias A THRU Z: Childcraft, Collier, Encyclopaedia Brittanic, Encyclopedia Americana & library book but it never gave me any answer. Yet I never really researched it. Even trips to the Smithsonian as a kid were useless! But later I found out it was a hoax thru the net & thru accidentally leading Jim Collier (a NYC Jew who also told my the zionists were psychopaths) on an a research of NASA FRAUD Amazing Adventure of a lifetime by introducing him to Bill Cooper at a Militia Gun Rally in Lansing Michigan. I tolx both of them to go to that Rally & pestered the Orgaizer to have them as Speakers. Collier about Computerized Vote Fraud. Cooper about the NWO.

Anyway my point is I should have picked up the ball & really researched NASA & space travel & Space & the ridiculousness of the of the Sun being 93 million miles away. How could you see thru all that black & obsticles that far away???

Also the biggest thing that showed me that supposed science was BS was that all my Encyclopedias liseted completely different ages of dinosaurs & other Animals supposed existances and extinctions & prehistoric ages. And the crazy school books listed yet more completely contradictory time frames!! lol Like for example one would say the same supposed dinosaur existed 7.5 billion years aho and another might say 80 milion years ago! lmao! And at the Smithsonian in DC the Curator admitted to me the a giant Dinosaur I forget it was a T- Rex or Bronchiasaurus contained on like two bones & some teeth & the rest of the bones were theorized or calulated from this couple bones & a few teeth! It always seemed complete BS & impossible to determine what the hell an animal lokked like from that kind of Crappy non scientific theorizing! But they determine all the dinosaurs just like that except some large lizards & Woolly Mammaths! But we still have Komoto Dragons & Elephants & the have no wool from the hoax Wooly mammoths! ‘Cause they are ELEPHANTS! LOL.

Finally my point truth is truth regardless of atracks & trolls & being made fun of, hated scorned or ridiculed!

No excuses Rudulf Research the Flat Earth now!!! It’s amazingly exciting once you start! It just keeps proving it self they more you look at the facts. You can try to disprove it all but you can’t! Not by what you think you know now about it but what you will start discovering!

It’s like discovering a thousand Sandy Hook Hoaxes at once! And people from every walk of life are finding it impossible to disprove & becoming flat earthers as most people 500 years ago. And as a third to half scientists & the engineers & architects still were in 1848! Architects & engineers never account for any curvature of the earth! Not Even Railroad, highway or Bridge engineers. They simple build & engineer the bridges & Railroads according to they lay of the land and deepth water if footings required and all the obsticles in their way like hills & Mountain. I just ask an old retired Bridge & Highways engineer/builder recently if he ever accounted for curvature & he said no he never heard of doing such a thing! See all these guys are never taught to account for curvature so they never even think about it really. When I showed him tge accepted formula for curvature ofbthe earth he said that was crazy. He said that was impossible the earth must be bigger than that…See they always assume the earth must be so big that the curvature never comes into play but it does. We all assume it is to account for our own experience of never observing curvature. And by rationalizing we are seeing the curvature when traveling over hills, dips, valleys & mountains. But–The curvature rapidly comes into play. The next time I saw him he said he was looking for me for days because it was driving him crazy for a couple weeks wanting to have somebody to talk to about it! He said the earth has to be flat & it only took him two days on the internet & doing research to be completely convinced the curvature was completely impossible with all his experience in light of the formula of earth’s increasing curvature per each mile.

If Pilots & Engineers can be completely oblivious to this their entire lives there is no wonder everyday people are! And pilots & Engineers are never taught anything about accounting for curvature or they would either screw everything up dangerously or they’d soon figure out there is no curvature at all! If you tried to adjust for curvature building a highway you’d soon being digging dozens miles into the ground over a few hundred miles! And you would not do that insanity so you would figure it there is no curvature of the earth ever! ..except hills, valleys & moutains & such. The road from South Florida to Key West is a bunch of Bridges atleast 150 miles– Across the Ocean! Yet there is no Curvature a flat level plane of Ocean! Except for places for boats to cross under & such! They built it level with no accounting for the non-existant curvature!

Unknown author #fundie hizb.org.uk

Western notions of democracy have come to dominate all discourse on governance, government structure, justice and accountability. Despite this dominance, electoral numbers at elections, trust in politicians and the ruling classes is at an all-time low in the West. Some thinkers in the West, class their liberal democracies as universal and consider all opposing systems as dictatorships. With the Muslims world demanding more and more of Islam to be present in their politics the Khilafah’s ruling system is a viable alternative for many. A lot of this is due to the failure of democracy to cater for the needs of the Muslim world and its flaws can be seen from a number of areas.

Whilst all would agree that their leaders should be elected, the reality of democracy is that regular elections favour those with money and adversely impact tough long-term decision making. Politics becomes about serving the elite not the public. The problem with frequent elections is that the more elections there are the more there is a requirement for money. Money and politics is one of the major cancers in democratic politics.

In essence the more elections you have the more likely you are to poison your system with money and short term thinking. This is what we see in the West today, countries dominated by powerful interests, riddled by political corruption and with soaring deficits and other long-term problems left completely un-tackled.

An alternative to both democracy on the one hand and dictatorship or absolute monarchy on the other hand is an election of a ruler with no term expiry as exists within the Islamic political system. This allows people on the one hand to freely choose their leader but on the other allows that leader the time to take tough long-term decisions for the benefit of the people.

Legislative sovereignty is at the very heart of Western civilisation, the ability to create one’s own laws, change them, adapt them and suspend them is held in high esteem as one of the bedrocks of liberal democracies. This is why we find after the events of 9/11 Western Europe has suspended some key principles and rights. We have seen the suspension of the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial and the right to be aware of the evidence that is being used to imprison you. These key rights, enshrined in Western maxims and used to extract other laws have been altered at will, even though they are supposed to be the bedrock of Western political tradition. With secularism at the heart of Western legislation, laws can be changed and even suspended at a whim.

The protection of individual freedoms is the bedrock of Western civilisation. However, the dilemma secular legislators face is what is beneficial to one person is not necessarily beneficial to another. People’s interests overlap and as a result there exists a constant renegotiation of space, entitlement and privilege. More often than not, the underlying criterion for an action is self-gratification and fulfilment – ‘What’s in it for me?’

A society where an individualistic outlook is common can only decline into a virtual free-for-all, as everyone, including the government, would attempt to take full advantage of life. Freedom therefore leads to people seeking their own benefit and more often than not, those with political and/or financial clout have the upper hand. This produces a host of problems, not least the conflict of people’s freedoms.

One of the fundamental pillars of democracy is that legislation is arrived at through majority voting. In the absence of any divine text, the need to derive legislation must be sourced from elsewhere.

(...)

Secularism, the complete separation between God and governance has become established as the Aqeedah of Capitalism, legislative sovereignty of man over god is central to democracy however one defines it. Islam is on the diametrically opposite side of democracy. Islam makes the Islamic texts sovereign – the supreme reference, mankind plays no role in legislating, only implementing.

Islamic governance does not proceed upon the same route as Western legislation, where safeguarding individual freedoms is considered the basis of legislation. Islamic governance does not make freedom the subject of discussion; it does not recognise or reject freedom. Hence, Islamic governance does not look at humans from the angle of them undertaking or not undertaking actions on the basis of freedom.

Whilst Islamic governance has many details and has been written about throughout Islamic history, the following are its key aspects.

The current situation prevalent in the Muslim world, where ruling families decide the laws that society must abide by whilst they remain above the very laws they have created, is just the other side of the democratic coin.

In Islam Allah (swt) is sovereign as explained in the Qur’an:

???? ????????? ?????? ??????

“The rule is for none but Allah” (Al-Anam:57)

This means that all laws need to be derived from the Islamic sources which are the Qur’an, Sunnah, Ijma Sahabah and Qiyas. Whilst all laws, maxims and principles are contained within these texts their application is where mankind must use its own capacities to ensure the right rule is applied for the reality it came for.

To ensure this happens Islam has recommended a constitution for the Islamic lands, where the role of the ruler and positions of power are clearly defined and mandated a constitution where the relationship between the ruled and ruler are clearly delineated. All this ensures that society is aware of the laws it will be judged by, which cannot be changed at whim, this will ensure a multiple tier society does not develop, where different laws apply to different segments of society. It also ensures the elites cannot influence the laws.

Islam has enshrined both institutional and decisional independence for the judiciary which far exceeds what is seen in Western democracies. Islam institutionalised an independent high court called the Court of Unjust Acts (Mahkamat Mazalim). It is presided over by the most eminent and qualified judges (Qadi Muzalim) and granted extensive powers by the Shari’ah. It has the power to remove any official of state regardless of their role or rank, including, most importantly, the Khaleefah if he persists in pursuing a path that lies outside of the terms of his Bay’ah (contract of ruling).

Ordinary citizens who have a complaint against the state can register it with the Court. What is unique about the Court of Unjust Acts, compared to other judicial courts, is that the Government Investigations Judge (Qadi Muzalim) has investigatory powers and does not require a plaintiff to register a complaint before launching an investigation. This court will therefore constantly monitor the actions of all officials of the state and the legislation adopted to ensure it conforms to the Shari’ah and no oppression (mazlama) is committed against the people. The executive counterbalance to the power of this Court is by the Khaleefah in principle having the power to appoint and remove the Chief Justice and any judges below him.

The laws and Islamic independent judiciary work to enforce are derived from the Islamic sources, this restricts what can be enforced as law. As Islam’s fundamental source – the Qur’an is revelatory, what is right and wrong is defined and thus the ruler nor the judiciary can deviate from this. With the introduction of a constitution, which allows more detailed rules from the Islamic sources, society will clearly know where it stands with regards to those acts which entail punishments and fines if violated.

The US constitution is considered a model template, which empowers the President with many powers but then restricts them through various mechanisms as power corrupts. Accountability in Islam is guaranteed through the institutions of government, in the obligation to establish political parties and through an individual obligation on all the citizens to enjoin the good and forbid the evil. There are also a host of various mechanisms rooted in Islam which act as checks and balances and restrict and regulate the ruler.

The Khaleefah is given wide mandatory powers in Islam, this is different to what is the norm in democracies where power is shared with a cabinet or parliament. Whilst the West institutionalised this in an attempt to curtail the possibilities of a dictatorship in reality it has given rise to mob rule where the collective act in concert like any individual dictator.

Islam has mandated that authority belongs to the Ummah. The Khaleefah is not a king or dictator who imposes his authority on the people through coercion or force. The Khaleefah’s authority to rule must be given willingly by the Muslims through the Islamic ruling contract known as Bay’ah. Without this Bay’ah the Khaleefah cannot rule. After this his authority is restricted to the hukm shari i.e. he cannot change what the Islamic texts have defined as right and wrong.
Islam has institutionalised the Bay’ah contract as the method to appoint a ruler.

This was outlined in many ahadith, amongst them: Muslim narrated on the authority of Abu Hazim who said: “I accompanied Abu Hurayra five years and I heard him talk about the Prophet (saw) saying: ‘Bani Israel used to be governed by Prophets, every time a Prophet died, another came after him, and there is no Prophet after me. There will be Khulafa’a and they will number many.’ They said: ‘What would you order us to do?’ He (saw) said: ‘Fulfil the Bay’ah to them one after the other, and give them their due right, surely Allah will account them for that which He entrusted them with.” (Sahih Muslim). The Bay’ah is between two parties – the Khaleefah and the Muslims. It is the people who elect the ruler, through popular will.

(...)

The Bay’ah is a contract and as such it is allowed to add extra conditions to this contract that the Khaleefah must abide by, as long as these extra conditions do not violate the fundamentals of the contract. It would be allowed to restrict the Khaleefah to certain constitutional processes such as the empowerment of the Majlis al-Ummah (People’s Council) and the judiciary as counterbalances to the executive power of the Khaleefah.

Without the restriction on the term of office, the Khaleefah can focus on long term strategic planning for the state instead of short-term planning from one election to the next as we find in democratic systems. It also prevents corporate interests from hijacking the government agenda through campaign contributions that any Presidential candidate or party in the West must secure to achieve power.

The ruler possesses many executive powers such as appointing governors and mayors, developing the state’s foreign policy and accepting foreign ambassadors. He is however restricted to these and cannot go beyond this remit. The ruler’s role is restricted to the public sphere and so Islam would forbid him from interfering in the private lives of his citizens. So whilst the Khaleefah holds all executive powers within the Khilafah his powers are restricted by the Shari’ah.

The powers of the Khaleefah are further restricted in Islam by the establishment of the Majlis al-Ummah. This is an elected council whose members can be Muslim, non-Muslim, men or women. These members represent the interests of their constituencies within the state. The Majlis has no powers of legislation like in a democratic system but it does have many powers that act as a counterbalance to the executive powers of the Khaleefah. These include expressing dissatisfaction with the assistants, governors, and mayors and in this matter the view of the Majlis is binding and the Khaleefah must discharge them at once. It also includes selecting the list of candidates standing for the position of the Khaleefah, no candidate excluded from this list may stand and the decision of the Majlis is binding. The Majlis also decides how much the ruler is paid and the allowances he may get.

In modern times the most appropriate style of conducting the Bay’ah is through a general election, where all mature Muslims, male and female have a right to vote for the Khaleefah of their choice. The Muslim representatives of the Majlis al-Ummah will shortlist the candidates for the Khaleefah and the people then vote for one of the candidates of their choice.

Islam has ordered the establishment of political parties. Political parties in the Khilafah are established primarily to account the Khaleefah and his government. Their task is to safeguard the thoughts of Islam in society and to ensure the government does not deviate from the implementation and propagation of Islam. The right of the Khilafah’s citizens to establish political parties is established from the Holy Qur’an. No permission is required from the government to establish political parties. Although members of the government will in many cases be members of political parties. The Khilafah does not have a party system of ruling as found in Western democracies.

In addition to the institutionalised mechanisms of accountability discussed so far, accounting the Khilafah is a right of all citizens of the state whether Muslim or non-Muslim. Although their representatives in the Majlis al-Ummah will undertake this task on their behalf they still have a right to perform this task themselves. Political apathy is a growing problem in the West. General elections are seeing fewer people voting especially amongst the young. Growing individualism among society is leading people to ignore the problems facing their communities and wider society and be concerned only with themselves. Islam not only obliged political parties with the task of enjoining ma’aruf and forbidding munkar but also individuals.

A central argument of liberals is that after restricting religion to the private lives of individuals, the West has seen unparalleled progress. Secularism has been central to the period of enlightenment and the postmodern world we currently live in. However there is a consistent pattern across all democracies of corruption. The US may be the preeminent democracy in the world but it is also one of the most corrupt.

US politics is riddled with special interests, a revolving door between politics and big business, political favours and backhanders. Though on the surface elections occur every two years, the reality is that incumbents rarely lose. In 2008, 94% of incumbents won in the House of Representatives and 83% in the Senate. This isn’t by accident, due to the significant money advantage enjoyed by incumbents and the continued redistricting.

Democracies should have secularised money and politics and not religion and politics. In Islam the ruler is not an employee who gets paid a wage, since he is not hired by the Ummah. The Khaleefah is given a pledge of allegiance (Bay’ah) by the Ummah to implement the Shari’ah and convey the Islamic Da’wah to the world. Although the Khaleefah is not paid a wage an allowance is assigned to him from the Bait al-Mal to meet his needs.

This allowance is a compensation for him since he is kept busy with the obligation of the Khilafah and cannot work and pursue his own business interests. This allowance is determined by the Majlis al-Ummah who will decide through shura (consultation) how much the allowance should be. They are the elected representatives of the Ummah and giving them the ultimate decision prevents any abuse of the public funds by the Khaleefah.

The ruler, governors, delegated assistants and judges – all the positions of ruling – are not paid a wage but an allowance as compensation as they are unable to take on employment. In this way Islam ensures money is kept far away from ruling.

(...)

Individuals have the right to account any organ or employee of the state, regardless of rank or seniority, this includes the head of state. Complaints can be submitted to the Madhalim Office who will initiate a process of validating and following due process in establishing facts. This office has the subsequent power to stipulate punishments. Individuals, Muslims and non Muslims, are allowed the right to peaceful congregation and protest. They are also allowed to seek out support to make representations to the state on their behalf.

Mark Tapson #racist #wingnut frontpagemag.com

Make Western Civilization Great Again

Universities have been ceding ground to anti-Western activists for decades now (remember Jesse Jackson leading chants of “Hey ho, hey ho, Western civ has got to go” at Stanford back in the ‘80s?). So it should come as no surprise that Yale recently announced it would grant yet another concession to multiculturalist students who demand that diversity of skin color replace the oppressiveness and irrelevance of Dead White Males: this spring will see the end of one of the school’s previously most popular classes, a survey course called “Introduction to Art History: Renaissance to the Present.”

According to the Yale Daily News blog, in its final iteration the course will shift from transmitting to students a greater appreciation of their cultural heritage, to a more “woke” focus on subverting the canon of Western art itself. The course’s instructor, art history department chair Tim Barringer, has stated that the class will still cover Western art chronologically from 1300 to the present, but he intends to emphasize that other regions, genres and traditions are as “equally deserving of study” as Western art, because according it any special reverence is “problematic.”

As we are all reminded daily now in every cultural arena from academia to Hollywood, anything Western is “problematic” (to put it politely) because multiculturalist doctrine deems that all cultures must be revered equally – except for Western culture which, because of its association with the toxic privilege of “whiteness,” must be denigrated, deconstructed, and dismantled to heal the nonwhite victims of its oppression and exploitation. Thus, we must be careful not to elevate the great works of the greatest artists in world history over other, “equally deserving” genres and traditions.

In a syllabus note to potential students, Barringer wrote that the emphasis would be on the relationship between European art and other world traditions. That is a fair topic for study, considering that Western artists have occasionally been influenced by other traditions: Picasso and African masks, for example (although such influence now would be devalued as “cultural appropriation,” another racist concept concocted by the postmodern and/or Marxist left). But the class also, according to Barringer, will consider art in relation to – wait for it – “questions of gender, class and ‘race’” and will discuss its relationship to Western capitalism. In other words, immersing ourselves in the transcendence and beauty that literally define great art and touch our common humanity must take a back seat to imposing our earthbound interpretations of how art divides us. Climate change also will be a “key theme.” Of course it will, because all intellectual streams now must feed into the river of today’s acceptable groupthink.

The Yale Daily News also reports that Barringer said he will invite students to write an essay nominating a work of art that has been left out of the course’s curriculum or its textbook. “I’m really looking forward to seeing what works the students come up with to counteract or undermine my own narratives,” he wrote. Newsflash, professor: your job is to educate and open the minds of your students, not see what these kids “come up with” to undermine your “narratives.” If they’re coming to school to lecture you and delegitimize your expertise, then what is the point of your job? What is the point of an art history department if art history can be wiped out or rewritten to suit and validate the gender- and race-obsessed whims of youth? Indeed, what is the point of a university anymore if it only exists to conform to the arrogant demands of children drunk with the power of their own dogmatic wokeness?

This change in the History of Art Department follows the Yale English Department’s decision in 2017 to “decolonize” its degree requirements after students presented a petition demanding that a survey course called “Major English Poets be abolished, and that the pre-1800/1900 requirements be refocused to deliberately include literatures relating to gender, race, sexuality, ableism, and ethnicity.” Yale caved then as well, making the course introducing English majors to such luminaries as Shakespeare, Chaucer, Milton, Spenser, Wordsworth, and Eliot “optional.” Meanwhile students can choose from such other options as “Black and Indigenous Ecologies,” “The Politics of Museums,” and “U.S. Afro-Latinx Literatures.”

Like far too many other universities, Yale quite simply has given students who have traded any sense of intellectual humility for belligerent activism too much power to determine the direction of their own edification. As the Yale Daily News notes, the art history major has adapted to changes “suggested” by students pushing to increase minority and female representation. The Director of Undergraduate Studies Marisa Bass noted, for example, that students have prompted the creation of art history courses like “Global Decorative Arts” and “The Politics of Representation.” She didn’t say whether there would be room in one of those courses for a truly notable “global decorative art” such as the breathtaking genius of Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel paintings (pictured above). Presumably, that would be “problematic” because Michelangelo is not representative of the correct skin color and genitalia that some students have declared must be prioritized.

There is nothing wrong with a history of world art survey course that examines art from all over the world. But the de-emphasis of Western art at a major university in a course whose time frame begins with the European Renaissance, and the administrative kowtowing to a very vocal minority of politicized students, is an intentional devaluation of our own civilizational achievements and does a disservice to students who need to be roused from the anti-Western indoctrination they are subjected to now from kindergarten onward. Teaching that our own culture has a “problematic” history while uncritically revering every other tradition is anti-intellectual, bigoted, and self-loathing. And downgrading our appreciation for and comprehension of great art to examining it in terms of its racial and class dynamics is reductionist and divisive.

It's time for our universities to help make Western civilization great again.

Various Commenters #racist stormfront.org

RE: “Stamped” - What Blacks Think About America

(PaleIsPretty)

I personally consider blacks the enemy. Not only because I do not wish to share a society side by side with them but mainly because whites are mixing with them at increasing rates.. even the elusive (until recently) wm/bw pairing.

It's no wonder how they feel about America and their patriotism being "different." That is because worldwide they identify as AFRICAN first before their nation of birth.

If only Whites could hold such a frame of mind!

(forrester)

Blacks are inferior. They are stupid and lazy by nature. Look at any negro section 8 housing project where the people live off welfare and see how they do nothing productive at all all day. Blacks have smaller brains and are more violent and prone to crime. What people have been right about them for as long as they were around blacks that they are less evolved. I think Rushton and Carlton Coon we're right. They told the truth about race and iq and the science establishment denounced their work.

(White gold)

It was a mistake to bring them here. Take anyone into your home aka nannies, house cleaners, gardeners, etc and they become part of the home, and a certain amount of intimacy is inevitable.

Whites need to stop using non whites as our help!! This habit of having non whites do our chores has literally decimated white civilizations!

Blacks are a cautionary tale. It might seem these lower IQ coloreds are a bargain, but our descendants will pay dearly. They will always remain dependent on us, and both they and us will hate it!!

We need to pick our own fruit, and have only white nannies, housekeepers, gardeners, etc. We will pay more now, but save so much in the future.

About 10 years ago some popular US black rapper came to Poland for concert and collabo with local hip-hop artists. I remember an interview with him when said that he always feel like a total foreigner and immigrant in America despite the fact his ancestors lived there throught the hundreds years.

This is because the United States was built for whites by whites. Blacks did not build America. We were over 90% of the population till like 1965.
America was conceived from white men’s minds. They are the foremost architects of what was once the greatest nation in the world.

It was the Jews passing themselves off as white that convinced white men that America wasn’t a people but an idea that anyone could subscribe to. Now a Mexican illegal can walk across the border and births a baby and that baby is as American as you or I am. But she knows, and the baby when he grows up knows that is not so because they will both hate America, and say we stole it.

For a race to love a country it must have been conceived by their own people. If it wasn’t they will never truly feel comfortable there.

(Ethan Edwards)

I, absolutely, consider the negro to be an enemy. If you do not, you are foolish, because that is exactly what they consider you to be (no matter what your TV, Hollywood Madison Ave., etc. tell you). If you consider the black to be your friend or ally, you are setting yourself up to be their victim.

(SirWalterWhite)

I only made it half way before I determined blacks are StoOpiD and couldn’t continue.

The only thing really accurate is blacks are not wholly human.

That's right. Blacks are not fully human. It's time for the stupid white masses to realize this fact. No more coddling them, no more enabling them, and no more having them live off of hard working white families.
They are savages. Let's get those boats moving!

1amayatakeru #homophobia deviantart.com

I would like to add my two cents into the whole anti gay couple. First off. to people saying we have no right to complain about gay couples can fuck off. You twats have nothing to say when the LGBT complain about representation when the minorities complain about lack of diversity, then people who dislike gay couples can complain about the overuse of it in their fandoms without being treated like idiots.
Like that bitch peacefulinvasion who calls other users racist and homophobic while saying they shouldn't be offended with excessive drawings of gay couples, but is offended by words that she dislikes. They are words hunty, cover your eyes if they hurt your sensibilities.

In the fandoms the lgbt fanartists who draw excessive gay porn are damn hypocrites and using the fandom for their own gain. They are leeches. In fact, one such gay fanartist actually complained that she was upset that there was no gay content in the Witcher. I mean this is a game with beautiful graphics and a good storyline, and you can complain that Geralt is not getting butt loving. Really?
The gay couple artists don't care about the characters or the work, all they want is to soil the franchise or profit off them.
When they are not touting off about their commisions, which they feel represents their hard work of tracing from actual artists, they scream about stealing. I had some idiot come onto my deviantart and scream about how another user stole art, and I was supposed to care. Like bitch, the artist draws gay couples, who gives a fuck. See artists see fandoms as their willing slaves, hence as a fan you are obligated to support your fav artist when getting nothing in return.

And hating gay couples is natural. You want to know why you hate gay couples, cause it is natural to hate abnormalities, check out a science article who found men disliked seeeing gay men kiss similar to maggots. It is a biological response.

And people screaming about how we want to stop artists from drawing what they love, bohoohoo. The artist only draw what gets them views and commisions, it is disgusting that some plagarist artist can demand 40 dollars for his copypasta while real artists who attempt to do worthwhile things don't get to demand as such.
There is no freedom of expression, everything has a limit and is censor. Same way someone can't use hate speech or someone else will be offended, someone can't fill the space with gay porn and expect not to get hate on.
And as consumers we can complain about the gayfying of our fandom just like anyone.
Like how gays complain of queerbaiting when there is none.
or how they start stupid shit by encouraging heterosexual characters be gay cause its sexy
like #giveelesaagirlfriend, #givecaptainamericaaboyfriend and all that crap.
Gay fanartists have lead to increase in gay support and a demand by entitled fans to make their gay couples canon. And it does have an effect on real life that directly effects everyone. Look at Korrasami, a gay couple in a kids show, what does it teach girls? Use men and disgard them for women. What about the popularity of Klance that ruins the friendship between two men to make them gay in a kids show. It is sick.
We can start #stopmakinggayfanart. It is not healthy and downright creepy.

Nickrobi #fundie reddit.com

the left won't drop immigration because without steady stream of ethnic minority voters they will be crushed

US is the proof of that. The left managed to win the demographic battle there - if the country hadn't gone from 90% to 65% white since 1965 it would a one party country with Republicans running pretty much every single legislature.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

Few students of history ever learn the truth that America was founded by freemasons as a vehicle by which to achieve world government. Our first U.S. President was George Washington, a devout Freemason. It was all laid out in 1775 by Adam Weishaupt in his secret society called, what else, “The Illuminati.” The newly constructed One World Trade Center at ground zero in New York City is exactly 1776 feet tall, deliberately build to that height in honor of the year in which the U.S. Declaration Of Independence was signed, 1776.

The building is saturated with occult symbols and has the markings of the Godless New World Order all over it. It was bad enough that after 911, ground zero featured a 911 memorial with the All Seeing Eye of Horus. Adjacent subway walls had ceramic tiles removed and replaced with All Seeing Eye designs (see photos to right and below). Creepy! Truth is stranger than fiction.

In the recent photo displayed at the beginning of this article, you can clearly see The Great Pyramid displayed by the outer surface of the newly constructed One World Trade Center building. This is the Illuminati's way of claiming victory over their prey—in this case, the American people!!! The tallest building in America is a giant 1776 foot tall penis!!! I'm not dirty minded, I'm telling the truth!!! The building's architect said it, saying that the building was designed to emulate the Washington Monument. Nebuchadnezzar's image was a 90 x 9 foot obelisk, also a male phallus. This occult image has its origins in pagan ancient Egypt, which you can easily research in numerous online articles.

The obelisk is an symbol of occult power and might, and a reminder to informed Christians that Satan is the god (little g) of this evil world (2nd Corinthians 4:4). When you see the Washington Monument (which appears in umpteen movies, books, magazines and media sources), it is a constant reminder of the Masonic control over America. America's secret destiny is to be destroyed as a launching pad for world government. This is what is meant by the Latin phrase 'E Pluribus Unum' on the reverse of every U.S. dollar (much information on America's secret destiny) which interpreted means, “Order Out Of Chaos.” America must be destroyed. This will be the Beast system of the coming Antichrist, aka, the New World Order. Even so, come, Lord Jesus!!!

Sunnnnnshineeee #homophobia #transphobia #racist amren.com

RE: Uber Driver, 28, Plotted to Drive His Car Into ‘Evil’ Gay Pride Parade to Kill Non-Muslims, Court Hears

I dislike Muslims but honestly, I think gays are worse. Muslims have absolutely no business in our countries, they shouldn’t be our problem. Gays are just civilization destroyers, no matter how you slice it. Obviously not saying this guy should kill anyone, but we also shouldn’t be celebrating deviance as a society.

[I dislike Muslims but honestly, I think gays are worse.]

You like terrorism more than quiche? Interesting.

If things were the way they should be, we wouldn’t have to worry about Muslims and their beliefs, because they’d be in their own lands.

And let’s be real here, the gays are just as militant in demanding people “convert” to their beliefs. They want to push their ideology on us and force us to celebrate them. They’re making it illegal for parents to try and get their gay children help, and are trying to make it illegal for parents to stop their minor children from mutilating themselves because they claim to be “trans”. And let’s not forget Drag Queen Story Hour and endless Pride parades and the fact that their uncontrolled sexual deviance has spread so many diseases and even brought many back into prominence, and their disgusting ways helped create MRSA and other super bugs.

Marisa Martin #fundie wnd.com

More proof that most modern “comics” are anything but comical come in the form of their newest Islamic promotional efforts. Marvel Comics presents Kamala Khan, a 16 year-old superhero from a New Jersey, Pakistani family. Not a Pakistani Christian family, because few of them have either survived or been allowed to immigrate here.

“Kamala Khan is just an ordinary girl from Jersey City,” Marvel announces, “until she is suddenly empowered with extraordinary gifts.” To be authentic, the poor girl wouldn’t have her genitals intact and couldn’t leave her house at night without a few male sidekicks ordering her about. But what’s a little reality compared to covering for misogyny and terrorism in Islam?

Kamala is the new incarnation of Ms. Marvel, unveiled in early 2014. Older versions weren’t relevant in the war against Christianity and Western civilization, but most “superheroes” are properly realigned now. They’ve had epiphanies of progressive thought, similar to President Obama and his transcendent gay marriage downloads from the sky.

Steadily increasing numbers of Islamic protagonists in pop culture prove there’s nothing like running jets into thousands of people to improve your image. They went from nada to notorious overnight. Next week they’ll be stars. Maybe the Poles should try it.

Kamala is the brainchild of Islamic-American convert Gwendolyn Willow Wilson and other Islamic staff. A successful journalist and writer of graphic novels for teens, she lived in Egypt for years. She even interviewed the grand mufti of Egypt, Ali Gomaa. None of this is proof Wilson is a terror supporter; yet the entire Marvel enterprise reeks of entertainment to camouflage genocide, using trivialization, distancing and distraction … with great illustrations, of course.

Supposedly Kamala was born to counter “Islamophobia” in the middle of the Islamic terror war against us. Superman and the old fellows actually supported American GIs, even showing up on the battlefields. Somehow Marvel forgot to create Germanic übermenschen in capes and lederhosen to prevent outbreaks of Naziphobia. What were they thinking?

Gifted but tragically liberal artists team up to fight against women and minorities of the Middle East in many contemporary initiatives and publications, like this one. A classical Stalinist disinformation campaign, anything relevant is minimalized or labeled opposite to reality, where they do everything but tap dance around neon signs blazing “nothing is happening here … you’re imagining everything … especially if you’re in a displacement camp or cage.”

Annihilated Christians in Syria apparently aren’t worth the ink to print comic books now. Female victims in Islam are also invisible. Serious issues are identificational “struggles” of teenage Muslim immigrants. Marvel Comics has just volunteered to be another outpost in an Islamic war campaign at this point. Deflecting controversy and discussion is the entire raison d’être of Ms. “ad hoc” Marvel.

Old Archie struggled with competition and other teen angst, but he wasn’t representing a group of killers while he did it. It would be encouraging if Marvel’s Islamic “superhero” struggled against honor killings, threats, misogyny, beatings, child marriage and genital mutilation.

Large wings of Western artists feel Muslims deserve extra kudos, although they’ve nearly annihilated Christians from several nations. If this continues (and few around here seem eager to stop them), it may happen in our burgs. You can bet your last copy of the Constitution that Kamala Khan won’t be showing up in her little red tights and shamefully exhibited face to save American women and assure our rights. Western hussies.

Marvel’s artists are as skilled as ever, but how they can sleep at night – if they have an inkling what is happening in the Mid-East – is a mystery.

Speaking of places like Syria …

Ms. Marvel sternly announces in her first book, “My name is Kamal Khan and I’m here to take out the trash.” Ruins and smoking streets in the panel are like the photos of devastated towns in Syria, Nigeria and Iraq. It’s clear that actual human rights of actual humans do not concern artists, writers, editors or many patrons of Marvel Comics any longer … which is tragic.

With all the back thumping and slogans, few can make a connection anymore between, say, mass murder and uncritical support of Islam.

An example is Daily Beast’s Twitter page for May 26, 2015. Tweets raving over Ms. Marvel and various graphic-diversity efforts nest beneath a notice that Boko Haram has made a comeback with help from ISIS. What will they have Ms. Marvel do to help all the Christian girls they’ve kidnapped, raped or murdered? Let me be a prophet here – not a thing, even in imaginary space.

Kamala fights vaguely “wicked” forces (which has come to mean anything opposing the protagonist). Meanwhile subjects plaguing the planet are avoided like Ebola. Kamala’s character is Pakistani, where a few years back (in the real world) a teenage bride’s nose and lips were sliced off by her husband. Muslim police refused to help.

(...)

Voilà Kamala Khan, Islamic super heroine, making certain no one thinks, speaks or writes misleading stuff about those wild and wacky Muslim terrorists. The new Ms. Marvel caught on fast and is quite the rage. She’s received film offers and shown up at least 38 times in the comics at the tender age of 15 months.

Predictably, the Huffington Post ran a gushing promotional piece with Kamala’s debut, informing progressives exactly how to receive the new Ms. Marvel. “When Marvel Comics announced the debut of its latest superhero … it was correctly seen as a positive development.”(...)

(...)But they did better than that. Faiza Patel was chosen by Huff Post to write about the new Ms. Marvel. Patel, a professional Muslim apologist, regurgitated the common types of disinformation she is paid to do: dismay that FBI targets Islamic religious conservatives for reasons she cannot possibly fathom, and so on.

Several paragraphs of deceit later, Patel waxes hopeful over a cartoon character to rehabilitate, not murderous Islam, but the people who don’t like it. “Kamala Khan” may cause people to think “Muslims can be heroes as well as villains” she claims.

Her next statements are more authentically Islamic, a “vanquishing” of anti-Muslim prejudice with “sustained and energetic efforts.” That’s what we’re fighting right now honey. May we never accept the norming of Islamic cruelty regardless of the combined onslaughts of sold-out “super heroes” and shills. With all her super powers, will Kamala Khan ever be able to drive across Saudi Arabia without her father? I doubt it.

wwweamonreillydotcom #wingnut #fundie deviantart.com

In recent years many of my former music, movie and literary heroes have let me down and I stopped being a fan.

Most recently I realised that the band Eels and their front man E (Mark Oliver Everett) actually support (baby-butchering and baby-part-selling) Planned Parenthood. I was a massive fan since 'Beautiful Freak'. Even read 'Things the grandchildren should know' (there are no grandchilden btw, no children either. Maybe Planned Parenthood has got them all) I an no longer a fan. My conscience won't let me be.

Before that I liked a few of The National's songs only to hear that they too support the baby-butchering and baby-part-selling Planned Parenthood.

I was a massive fan for years of U2 (ever since 'unforgettable fire' in 1984) until they couldn't keep out of Ireland's marriage referendum. They even brought the bitter, twisted, catholic-hating drag queen 'Panti' onstage in Dublin. I despise the band now and realise how foolish and blind I was to their massive hypocrisy for years. A mulit-million dollar band that won't even pay taxes in their own country.

I have almost every album 'Moby' has released since 'play' in 2000. I found out he too supports the legalised killing of babies in the womb and is an anti-Trump nutter. Don't believe me? Check out his twitter page. "The Little Idiot" is right!

Since the early 80s I was a massive Bruce Springsteen fan. I got every album and saw him in concert several times. A few years back I saw that he is staunchy pro-abortion and supported the abortion-loving, 7-nation-drone-bombing Obama in his two campaigns (despite having said previously that it's not good for an artist to be too close the the seat of power). what a HYPROCRITE

Recently in Ireland a bunch of Irish singers, musicians, writers, artists, architects all came together calling themselves "Artists for Repeal 8th" to try and repeal Ireland's life saving 8th Amendment. (This 8th Amendment has saved hundreds of thousands of babies lives for the past several decades and is safe for BOTH mother and baby. There has never been any trouble with this heroic 8th Amendment) Any of those artists (many of them I was a fan of beforehand) will be boycotted by me forever more.

It's like being stabbed in the back by an old friend but my conscience will not let me be a fan of any of the above again. In times of trouble you find out who the good guys are......

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

In the recent photo displayed at the beginning of this article, you can clearly see The Great Pyramid displayed by the outer surface of the newly constructed One World Trade Center building. This is the Illuminati's way of claiming victory over their prey—in this case, the American people!!! The tallest building in America is a giant 1776 foot tall penis!!! I'm not dirty minded, I'm telling the truth!!! The building's architect said it, saying that the building was designed to emulate the Washington Monument.

Andre Vltchek #fundie journal-neo.org

How Come the World is Suffering from Stockholm Syndrome

It may sound incredible, but it is true: in countries that have been damaged, even totally robbed and destroyed by the West, many people are still enamored with Europe and North America.

For years, I have been observing this ‘phenomena’, even in the most plundered, devastated war zones and slums. Often I was shocked, other times thoroughly desperate. I did not know how to respond, how to react, how to describe what I have been observing.

Then, a few days ago, in Syria, right next to the Idlib battlefield, close to the deadly positions of Al-Nusra Front, in a country where the West and its allies have murdered hundreds of thousands of people, one of my interpreters exclaimed in a ‘patriotic’ outburst: “Look how beautiful this land is! It is almost as beautiful as Europe!”

And at night, another guide of mine began nostalgically recalling his glorious days in Europe, when he could still go there; before the Syrian war began.

An interpreter did not know who Fidel Castro was (I had his portrait, lighting up cigar, as my phone screensaver), but both of them – my local companions at the battle ground – were fluent in Western slang and the worldview. They knew, however, near zero about China.They were patriotic and they fully supported their country, but at the same time they admired the West and Western journalists from the mainstream media – those very same propagandists who helped to bring their beautiful and unique Syria to the state in which it is now.

It all felt schizophrenic, but definitely not new.

I could not take it, anymore. I decided to write this story, despite the fact that it is an intellectual ‘minefield’. I decided to write it, because it is how it is. Because I have to tell it; someone has to. And above all, because it is absolutely essential to combat the crooked selfie image with which the West has been infecting almost all nations of the world, including all those that it has been plundering and raping.

*

Are we dealing with the so-called “Stockholm Syndrome” here? Most likely, yes. The victim falls in love with her or his tormentor.

For long centuries, the West has been colonizing, usurping, literally terrorizing the entire planet. Hundreds of millions have died as a result of colonialism, neo-colonialism, and imperialism. Wealth, cultural and educational institutions, hospitals, transportation, parks – all that Europe and North America possess to date and boast about, was constructed on mountains of bones, on genocide and unbridled plunder.

That cannot be disputed, can it?

Slavery, mass murder, genocidal expansions; the West robbed the world, and then consolidated its power, promoting its exceptionalism through relentless brainwashing (called ‘education’), propaganda (called ‘information’), and twisted entertainment for the masses that inhabit poor countries (called ‘culture’ and ‘the arts’).

Shockingly and absurdly, Europe and North America are still loved and admired by many, even (or especially) in such places where Western governments and companies plagued everything like locusts, leaving to the locals only burned land, poison and miserable slums.

*

How is it possible?

For years, I have been working in Africa, a continent which was entirely subjugated by the U.K., France, Germany, Belgium and other European expansionist nations. Africa from where millions of men, women and children were brought in chains to the “New World”, as slaves. Where millions died during the ‘hunt’, where millions died in ‘transit centers’, and then, on the open seas. That’s tens of millions of ruined lives. The complete plunder of the resources, the unimaginable humiliation of the people, broken cultures, genocides and holocaust against local individuals from what is now Namibia, to the Democratic Republic of Congo. Great African heroes like Lumumba assassinated by the Western rulers.

And yet, many Africans see the West as some great ‘example’, as a ‘guiding light’, as a severe but respectable ‘daddy’, who uses the belt when it is necessary, but who also rewards justly those of his ‘children’ who ‘behave properly’.

It is repulsive, but undeniable.

The greatest African writers are now teaching at U.S. and U.K. universities. They have been ‘neutralized’ and ‘pacified’, many of them out rightly bought. In many countries, African judges wear comical white wigs, doing their best to look like their British counterparts. The children of corrupt elites are collecting diplomas from the U.K. and French universities, imitating upper-class European accents.

To behave, to look and sound like the colonizers, is something that brings respect.

The same on the Sub-Continent, of course.

The mannerism among the upper classes in India and Pakistan are those of the U.K. (and lately, of the U.S.). Elites there go out of their way to be more British than the Brits; more Californian than the inhabitants of the U.S. West Coast. Countless private Indian universities call themselves ‘American’ or ‘British’, with ‘Oxford’ or ‘Cambridge’ frequently ‘decorating’ their names.

‘To be accepted’ in Europe or North America is the highest honor, in almost all former colonies, therefore, in almost the entire world.

‘Well groomed’, well-educated and modern Asians, Latin Americans, Africans and the Middle Easterners are expected to ape Westerners; to dress like Westerners, eat (and drink) like the Westerners and to ‘defend the same values’ as them.

In fact, they are expected to be much more Western than the Westerners.

But ‘expected’ by whom? Yes, you guess correctly: very often by their own people!

*

Ask and many in the ‘South’ will tell you: everything that comes from the West is beautiful, progressive and dandy.

“Every bule is beautiful,” I was informed, recently, by a young indigenous professional lady in the totally environmentally plundered island of Borneo/Kalimantan. Bule is a vulgar, derogatory Indonesian word for the ‘whites’, and literally means ‘albino’. However, the lady was not joking, it was a compliment: she was brought up believing that every bule is actually superior and fine-looking.

In the indigenous Mexican state of Yucatan, right after the elections that brought to power the left-wing President Obrador, I overheard the conversation of a dozen or so upper-class housewives in a Western chain café. Their references were fully European and North American: From vacations in Italy and Spain, to the films they were watching, books they were reading. Europe was their ‘mother-continent’, while Miami, their only true comparison. Before Obrador came to power, indigenous people were increasingly living in misery, their roofs broken, jobs disappearing. But the elites were, as always, in a European state of mind. The real Mexico was not on their radar. It did not matter, or didn’t even exist.

Even some of the poor in the ‘conquered world’ who are actually ‘concerned’ about Western imperialism, see it as an abstract problem.They see it as a strictly political, military or economic issue. The fact that Western imperialism has ‘culturally’ immobilized entire nations and continents is hardly addressed.

Even in those proud countries that are determinedly struggling against Western imperialism – China, Russia, Iran, or Venezuela – the Western narrative of exceptionalism has already managed to cause tremendous damage.

In China, for instance, almost everything ‘Western’ had been, until recently, associated with modernity. Being ‘against the West’ was considered boring, gray and outdated, somehow connected to the ‘Communist propaganda’ of the past (the fact that the ‘Communist propaganda’ was often correct, mattered nothing). This attitude allowed the great infiltration of Chinese universities by Western academia, as well as the injection of Western nihilism into Chinese arts, culture, even way of life. Only recently, has this dangerous trend been reversed, but not after it had already caused great damage.

The admiration of everything Western destroyed the greatest progressive experiment of modern history – The Soviet Union and the so-called “Eastern Bloc”.

The power of negative Western propaganda packaged together with the promotion of extreme individualism, selfishness and consumerism, literally wiped out all internationalist zeal, humanism and higher principles, from the minds of tens of millions of young Czechs, Poles, East Germans, Bulgarians, and even Soviets.

The once proud Communist Eastern Bloc, after liberating dozens of countries from colonialism, after fighting for an egalitarian world, showing solidarity with all oppressed nations, was then gradually defeated by such shallow bullshit as blue jeans labels, the nonsensical lyrics of rock and pop songs (a favorite weapon of the West), greed, religions (another Western weapon), and slogans like ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’ (the Western world which has been denying freedom and democracy to almost all countries on our planet, cynically turned the truth upside down, and fooled East Europeans, by skillfully applying centuries long propaganda methods).

In the end, confused and increasingly cynical, what many East Europeans demanded was not ‘freedom’, but more money, more labels, and the ability to join the bloc of the countries that have been plundering the world.

*

So, what makes the West so successful, when it comes to brainwashing people all around the world? How is it possible after all that banditry, terror and ruthlessness, that most of the oppressed and conquered countries are still showing plenty of respect to the masters that reside in New York, London or Paris?

I believe that if we find the answers to this question, we will be able to save the world, and reverse this deadly trend.

First of all, after interacting with thousands of people in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, Oceania and Latin America, I am coming to the conclusion that the West (and Japan) is often admired for the ‘high standards of living’.

In such miserable and collapsed countries like Indonesia, I often hear nonsense like: “European countries are more ‘Muslim’ than we are. They treat people much better than we do.”

Middle and upper class Southeast Asian families are travelling to Netherlands or Germany, and then exclaim after returning home: “Look at their parks, hospitals, bicycle lanes, trams, museums… We have to learn from them! They do so much for improving our world.”

That’s precisely what Africans admire about Europe. That’s how many ‘educated’ Indians or Southeast Asians feel. That’s what Peruvians, Hondurans or Paraguayans love about their Miami.

Are they wrong? Isn’t there, after all, plenty that poor countries could learn from the West?

Yes; definitely they are wrong. Totally wrong!

Let’s see ‘why’?

The West ‘arranged’ the entire world in accordance with its own feudal system of the past centuries. It brought the system of shameless oppressive regime to the global level.

To admire this monstrous and regressive global system would be like admiring the arrangement of European societies some three hundred years ago. It would be essentially like saying: “Look, the aristocracy of France or England was actually quite fine, egalitarian, educated and healthy, and we should learn from how they lived, and copy their examples!”

Of course, the aristocracy, the royalty and the church of Europe has always lived well, even 300 years ago. They had good schools for their children, they had decent medical care, palaces, summer villas, sanatoriums with mineral waters, theatres, lavish parks, and tons of servants.

The only ‘tiny’ problem was that some 95% of the population had to work for the luxury they enjoyed, subsisting in total misery. Plus, of course, those tens of millions of un-people in the colonies were being exterminated like animals.

The same is happening now. The entire Europe (with the exception of the poor people there) has moved to the bracket of new aristocracy, at least comparatively. And the rest of the world is laboring, dying, being raped and plundered, in order to maintain this ‘wonderful-looking’ social-state project of the West. Even the U.S. and its relatively brutal turbo-capitalist model is still ‘socialist’ (for the U.S. citizens), compared to such countries as Indonesia, India, Peru or Nigeria.

Western standards of living cannot be replicated elsewhere. To believe that the West would allow Africans or Southeast Asians to build a social state is naïve, almost intellectually insulting. Singapore, South Korea and Japan are rare exceptions, where the West closed both eyes, for strictly strategic reasons.

In order for the West to prosper, maintaining a super high standard of living, with all the benefits for its citizens, billions of the ‘serfs’ all over the world have to suffer, sacrifice themselves, and work for close to nothing; the more of them that live in hell, the better.

Nature has to be plundered in places like Borneo and Papua, DR Congo and soon in Brazil.

People have to be ruled by pro-Western corrupt oligarchs, and by the military and religious leaders. Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and now Brazil, are perfect countries for the West: they happily and willingly sacrifice their own people, guaranteeing Western prosperity.

You did not know? Nonsense! You did not want to know. All those people who matter are very happy with this arrangement: The Western rulers, citizens of Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand and Japan, as well as the rulers/elites in the poor countries. The only ones who are truly suffering are those billions of the poor, worldwide, but they matter nothing, and they are not told anything anyway, because the media is in the hands of the West and their lackeys, and so is ‘education’.

And as they are not told anything, they – the wretched of the Earth – are admiring the West, too. They eat Western junk food if they can save few dollars a month, they drink Nescafe instead of their traditional coffee, listen to the shittiest music, watch pirated Hollywood blockbuster movies, wear fake sneakers and jeans, and masturbate to Western porn (if they have internet). They also dutifully follow religions, which were injected and upheld by the West, into their countries.

The poorer the country, the greater appear to be the green hills and pastures of the Western paradise.

And so, it goes on and on.

In India, Indonesia, Uganda, Jordan, Fiji, Honduras, I hear the same crap, from semi-educated, or West-educated local citizens: “People in the West are actually very good people, but their governments are bad.” Are they sure about that? I wonder.

*

Frankly and honestly, I am tired of this status quo. And I don’t find this amusing at all: hearing admiring statements about European and other Western countries in the middle of the monstrous war zones, famine-stricken areas, brutal mines, on the banks of poisoned rivers and inside the slums.

I am an ‘old-fashioned’ revolutionary. Slaves have to rise and fight, if necessary die for freedom; not to admire their masters and tormentors.

The crimes of the colonialists have to be exposed. The insane arrangement of the world has to be defined and then smashed into pieces.

The cute trams, bicycle lanes, parks, museums, operas, cafes, universities and hospitals in Europe are built on rivers of blood and the bones of ‘The Others’. I said it three years ago on the floor of the Italian Parliament, and I will repeat it again and again, wherever I go.

There is no other topic that matters, right now, on our planet.

Everything is connected to this, including the fear and hate that the West feels and spreads about countries like Venezuela, Russia, China, Iran, South Africa, Syria or Cuba.

They hate us; they hate those who resist, who are standing tall. And they should and will get back the same in return, hopefully, if the truth is pronounced often enough!

Blunderbus #conspiracy news.yahoo.com

It is easy as pie to be a pervert anywhere with the Democrat Party, symathetic international Communist/Muslim Media, White House, Academia, Hollywood, Talk Shows, Internet, Big Education leading, and covering for them. Most of those defending them are closet perverts themselves in all those groups, mostly likely, even our President and his shrill wife included. It's hard to live out the moral compass we were all given originally and develop a real character.

But the Democrat Party has socially engineered an entire population of subhumans with their progressive ideologies and all these perverts think they normal. They can't remember they have forgotten God. But He still exists, in people who haven't forgotten. And one day, coming sooner than we think, one group is going to have to kill the other completely so that there will be peace, lasting peace on Earth. The end to story has already been written. We are all just watching it being played out and soon everyone will be involved in the play.

Yoweri Museveni #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni has decided to sign a law imposing up to a lifetime jail sentence for homosexuality, announced government spokesman Ofwono Opondo via Twitter on Friday. NRM caucus spokeswoman Evelyn Anite confirmed Opondo’s announcement to BuzzFeed.

…

Museveni made his announcement during a retreat with members of his party, the National Resistance Movement, which has primarily focused on the party’s leadership as it prepares for elections in 2016. Museveni had been facing stiff pressure from his colleagues to accept the bill.

The deciding factor may have been that a panel of party members with medical backgrounds Museveni convened to study the cause of homosexuality presented a report concluding homosexuality is not an in-born trait. Museveni had told lawmakers he would sign the bill if “I have got confirmation from scientists that this condition is not genetic.”

The committee chairman told BuzzFeed on Thursday, “Speaking as a medical doctor … homosexuality is just deviant behavior. It can be learned, and it can be unlearned.” - See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/uganda-president-reportedly-sign-anti-homosexuality-bill#sthash.ci2C29JG.dpuf

zarcon zarconinni #conspiracy theepochtimes.com

I don't know what the truth of Oak Isle is but 'Academia proper' has lost a lot of credibility with me since the time I saw an Egyptian chisel and hammer under a glass case at the ROM in Toronto and was informed that these were the tools that built the smooth building blocks that formed the 3 pyramids at Giza. Academia is an industry and as with all industries the Media is at their disposal, being owned by the same monied class. The waters are muddied when necessary and at other times favourable theories that suits their interests $$$ are presented as gospel.

And we like our ancestors who believed that when the priest said something it was necessarily true, we too believe that when a scientist says something it too must be necessarily true. We do not question, research or think for ourselves, but simply wait for the TV to tell us.

Jason Lisle #fundie jasonlisle.com

But one of many problems here is that apart from the Christian worldview you have no basis for believing that anyone has a moral obligation to be honest (or to be anything for that matter). And thus it makes no sense for you to criticize God or anyone else for allegedly failing to be honest. In the Christian worldview, we are morally obligated to obey our Creator. And God is truth and has commanded us to emulate His character - hence we ought to be truthful. In the Christian worldview we can discuss whether God has specified any qualifications or exceptions where it would be morally right to deceive. But such conversations would be meaningless apart from the Christian worldview because morality is meaningless apart from the Christian worldview

APride #racist stormfront.org

I am particularly upset about what happened this past Friday. I am in a summer school course, and it is grade 12 history. We were tasked with a group project on iconic historical figures, and to my dismay, my group chose Adolf Hitler.

It was not to my dismay because I dislike Hitler - I actually believe he was a visionary who had forseen the inevitable war of races. It was that I don't like confrontation much, and I understand that these beliefs upset some people. Regardless of this, I defend my beliefs.

In this case, I feel as thought my free speech was silenced, and my rights violated. Here's what happened:

So, as we met after class to begin our work at the library, my group began a discussion about the holocaust right off the bat. I mentioned that I don't really believe it happened for various reasons, and they were astonished. They began prying more for my beliefs, and I ended up admitting that I didn't think Hitler was a bad guy, and then the ONE black guy in our group who happened to also be the only guy in our class who was black asked me if I disliked the Jews. I answered honestly, and told him I didn't like or dislike them, but felt my race to be superior. He then called me a racist and said I probably hate blacks too. I answered him honestly, and told him that I think blacks are ruining the country and are uncultured and vulgar, and he just got really mad and stormed out of the library. About an hour later, our teacher shows up in person, and I began to panic. I was told to accompany her to the school. She called the principle of the school, and the situation was explained via conference call, and I was expelled. I just don't know what to think about all this.

Signaferte #fundie nymag.com

Firstly, the New Right is based off the Nouvelle Droite from Europe, an ethnic nationalist reaction against demographic changes in the west.

There is no connection between "Kosher Conservatives", i.e Republicans, evangelical christians, British Conservative Party, libertarians with this. It grew in Europe in the 90's and 00's as an existential crisis about migration, ageing populations, removal of traditional architecture, Americanization, and populist dislike of conservatives and liberals. It spread to the US in the late 00's online

Trumpists only partially overlap. Most Trumpists are Republicans, who cannot be "New Right'. Early on a lot of New Rightists supported Trump out of hate of Republicans and his few decent ideas, such as saying the Iraq war was bad and comments against globalism (alt-right is anti-war and doesn't support the US military)

Most Rightists have given up on him even before the election. He came out in support of globalism, supports mega-capitalism, supports pollution, has a Judeo-Christian zealot as VP, gone on neocon forades in Syria (All new-righters support Assad). The alt/new right is against military intervention, nation building, excess consumerism, obesity, fossil fuels (American-style) Judeo-Christianity, Americanization of culture, neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and of course cultural left-wing stuff.

The alt-right wants a world in which Europe is inhabited by whites practicing native traditional culture, higher birth rates, the USA is isolationist (and possibly split up) and doesn't spread pop-culture, green energy, third position economics (no excessive capitalism or socialism), rebuilding traditional architecture, education and academia are pro-Western

Unikitty #conspiracy givemegossip.com

The occult revealing of the Thundercats cartoon show (80s version).

The entire work of this cartoon is based upon Masonic and Luciferian practices and concepts.

PHALLIC WORSHIP.

Lion-0 the young "Lord of the Thundercats", receives his phallic sword as a boy on the brink of his teen years.
It's power source is an All Seeing Eye at it's center. A reptilian eye, showed as a cat's eye... that "speaks'
to Lion-o and gives him telepathic and intuitive vision. It's demonic and alive and is a gateway to another place or person.

His sword is small and when he uses it's power it becomes fully erect and larger. Exactly as a penis.

One day he will master his sword and it will submit to his hand. As a boy, it is too much for him to handle, it leads him at first.

The power flows though him for the fist time. And the sword controls him, as the penis and desire for sex and pleasure become his driving force and "power".

After crashing (falling from heaven/space), he quickly has the body of a man, now able to wield his sword. But his mind has not experienced the growing process.
This is representing masturbation. He thinks he is ready to wield his phallic sword but has no real experience. The legendary boy king is now
the lord.

He screams for his cats... hoes. Thundercats, Ho. Thundercats are loose. The God of fertility Pan.

The cats he calls for are his women/witches. They are his whores, his breeders, his concubines, now his phallus has made them loose.
Virgin whores. Right there in the catch phrase! This is not a stretch (pun intended) but a truth! The King needs women to seed his bloodline in the new world!

When his phallus is aroused and full of power (blood), he calls for them and they cum to take his reptilian seed.

The Lion King.

This touches on the occult legends of Osiris/Isis and the phallus. The Holy Wand/Sword myths. Jesus/Mary. Isis/Horus.

Mumm-Ra is a priest who communes with "Ancient Evil Spirits".
Covered in the symbols of DNA and the Caduceus. Representing the power unlocked in knowing thyself.

Gnostic teachings. DNA access. Genetic transmutation and engineering.

Mumm-Ra the ever living, is immortal and has the knowledge and gnosis of the past civilizations.
Lives in a Egyptian pyramid with a light, energy capstone.
More phallic/DNA references, as after Mumm-Ra uses his power, he is spent and needs to rest.

Lion-o, The Boy King who wields the Holy penis and Mumm-Ra represents the phallus and the DNA that flows through it.

The connection is the reptilian eye and snake headed DNA strand. This is all so clear and obvious. These symbols aren't hidden, they are constantly shown multiple times in every episode.

These symbols have nothing to do with children, accept from an aspect of sex, breeding and creating a special bloodline.

Again, the source of this power and DNA is clearly shown as REPTILIAN.

Lion-O's all seeing eye, reptilian sword and Mumm-Ra's helix, dual headed snake symbol.

To make all this even worse and more obvious, the pilot episode is based on the concept (yet again) that a son/sun man who would be king...
escapes a dying world (Superman) and must lead his people to a New World (NWO) by finding a new place to settle and SEED.

They find a little blue world, 3rd planet from a "little" sun! Ancient Alien Astronauts, Sumerian creation myths.

The remaining cast clearly fill out the supporting cast under Satan. The usual suspects.

Tygra is a stone mason. A builder. A brother in arms, knight Templar type who serves the Lion Lord.
In one of the first episodes, Tygra surveys the rock base and says this will be a good solid place to build our base.
In a later episode he is shown as an architect, with plans for the base and a clear picture of the cat tower facing the sun in the design. More phallic worship and Egyptian symbolism, sphinx, and astronomy.

Cheetara is a mystic, witch. A mother, sister, wife, trinity to the boy king.
She guides him, gently and at times seductively to "focus" his power. To help master his sword!

Panthro is an engineer. Uses technology to build their machines and gadgets.
In one of the first episodes, he reverse engineers their crashed spaceship (!) into a vehicle they can use.

The twins are tricksters. Magicians. They use smoke and mirrors to elude and confuse their enemies.

These are the same practices used by the masons and illuminati.

So what is this all doing in a children's show?

Mr Evilwrench #racist moonbattery.com

Heh, the blacks “toiled” picking cotton, just like the Chinese laid RR tracks. It was the whites that wrote the constitution, almost exclusively fought the revolution and civil war to free the largely unappreciative blacks, and established the capitalist economy that was the envy of the world. It was the whites as architects, all the way down to the truck drivers and riveters, that built the buildings, roads and cities. It was the whites that invented the essentials of technology, all the way up to the microchips. You’ve bought into misperceptions based on, what was that again? Oh yeah, hate.

Mark Osgatharp #fundie baptistboard.com

If you are saying that the simple fact of owning another man is unjust then you must also assert that Roman slavery was unjust, for they, too, practiced human bondage. As far as the mistreatment of slaves, I agree it is wrong, but it does not chang the obligation of the slave to obey the master.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

I'm so sick of lame preachers who are woefully ignorant that the 911 attacks were an inside job. Do your homework! There's nothing more repulsive than to hear some country preacher fifteen years after the 911 attacks still talking about Muslims flying two planes into the World Trade Center (WTC) towers as the cause of their implosion. THERE WERE BOMBS IN THE BUILDINGS!!! How do 2 planes bring down 3 buildings? Obviously, they can't. Furthermore, in the history of high-rise fires, some of which totally incinerated the towers, not one building has ever crumbled to the ground, let alone 3 in one day!!!

Thousands of architects, engineers and experts have testified that it is IMPOSSIBLE for jet fuel to bring an entire skyscraper to the ground. Those WTC buildings imploded to the ground in less than 15 seconds. WTC 7 a block north was never struck by a plane and imploded to the ground in less than 7 seconds! When a preacher believes the bogus official story of 911, it makes him look woefully ignorant and discredits him in the eyes of those who are more knowledgeable about the truth than he is. No one should be more aware of the truth than the preacher!!!

Etienne Charland, known as the Emergence Guardian™ #crackpot #magick #mammon spiritualselftransformation.com

God Connection Attunement
Jump-start your connection to God from ~3.2% to 100%.

Who is this for? Spiritual seekers who seek a quicker path to peace and prosperity.

What is it? We live in a Luciferian society that seeks to trim God out of everything. Most lightworkers have around 3.2% connection to God. I will use my own connection to God to open up yours at 100%, just like how you'd jump-start a car whose battery is dead.

This service comes with a complimentary e-book, How to Connect with God The Easy Way, which explains all the details of the methodology.

We recommend that you first try by yourself, then if you need help, purchase the God Connection Attunement.

>> Get the complimentary e-book How to Connect with God The Easy Way
>> Purchase the God Connection Attunement

Although benefits vary greatly from person to person, here's what I notice when I increase it for myself. When it's low, I feel a lot of struggle and conflicts all around that I need to push against. When I open up the connection to God, it lifts the struggles and things really start flowing in the right direction. It doesn't mean it solves everything, but there's a sense of peace that everything is as it should.

Then, by definition, opening up the genuine connection to God gets you out of the False Light Matrix. You start aligning with the divine energetic matrix, which means you get a whole new level of support from above, and it changes all the dynamics.

When going through this level of deep shift, there can be an adaptation period where your thoughts and behaviours gradually stop and go on neutral while you shift and adapt a new way of being. This phase can last about 2 weeks.

Note that as you take a fork out of the False Light Matrix into the Divine Matrix, the benefits will keep growing and compounding over time.

Benefits

On average, it will look like this within 6 months. I'm using kinesiology to measure these numbers.

95% reduction of mind control
92% reduction of energetic chaos
72% reduction of energetic pressure
72% reduction of vulnerability to social engineering
440% increased support from angelic beings
318% increase of spiritual energy
315% increase of divine guidance
215% increase of emotional energy
118% increase of mind clarity
58% increase of peace
57% increase of health
28% increase of vitality
For a spiritual person with dysfunctional relationship with money, increase in financial wealth will often manifest after 6 months of sustained connection to God. I'm measuring 15% wealth increase after 6 months, and 315% increase after 1 year? Time will tell. For those with a healthier relationship with money and means to generate income, it can be a lot faster but extremely variable.

More importantly, on average, it brings 52-58% increased drive to move forward and do the right things within a month, leaving behind spiritual lethargy.

In essence, it will:
Disconnect you from the False Light Matrix (92% of Lightworkers are in it)
Overcome spiritual lethargy (86% of Lightworkers are in it)
Render mind control technologies ineffective (everybody is affected by those)
Plus the effect is highly contagious.

Although measuring these exact numbers with kinesiology isn't easy, you can easily measure the accuracy of the above numbers. I'm getting about 96% accuracy.

Normally, opening up the connection once will be enough, especially since it is increasing for the whole planet in this context of ascension. It can still however go down due to certain events, and hopefully by then you'll start doing real Alchemy work yourself.

With a God Connection Attunement, I can maintain it for you for 1 full year. If it goes down, send me a message and I'll bring it back up.

Since results vary greatly from person to person and are hard to predict, you can get a free assessment where I will measure:

Current connection to God (in the Temple of the Soul and in the Lighthouse inner buildings)
What % you're ready for it
% benefits you'd get within 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and a year
Just send me a quick message on Facebook and say “Can you do a God Connection Attunement assessment for me?” If your picture isn't on your profile, also attach a picture of yourself. That way I can do it quick for free.

If you're less than 10% ready for such attunement, I may refuse or suggest a better option for you, such as 1-on-1 coaching.

Since it requires a great deal of energy from my side, the investment for this is $497. I wouldn't plug my inner building into someone else's demolished building for just anyone, but for $497, I'll do it. Once it's done and stable, I disconnect.

Gregory Hood #wingnut #racist amren.com

Leftists Rage Against Classical Architecture

The Trump Administration has reportedly drafted an executive order to make “the classical architecture style” the “preferred and default style” for federal buildings. This would probably prevent eyesores like the U.S. Federal Building in San Francisco and the U.S. Courthouse in Austin. The Architectural Record reports that the draft requires buildings to display the values of “democratic Athens” and “republican Rome,” rather than “Brutalism and Deconstructivism.”

“Brutalism” comes from the French word brute, which means “raw concrete,” and wasn’t meant to define a deliberately harsh style. But it does. “Brutalism” is about creating buildings that display their construction material rather than concealing them for aesthetics’ sake. Architects often put up these unadorned buildings for public housing projects, and the style was popular in the Soviet Bloc. “Brutalism” is thus associated with socialist and vaguely totalitarian government schemes — and collapsing neighborhoods.

“Deconstructivist” architects deliberately avoid harmony and symmetry, in a school influenced by Jacques Derrida. Their buildings seem to be in motion or splitting apart, and violate traditional standards of beauty. The style has explicit political overtones. For example, a triangle juts out from the Museum of Military History in Dresden, Germany; architect Daniel Libeskind said he wanted to “penetrate the historic arsenal” and “engage the public in the deepest issue of how organized violence and how military history and the fate of the city are intertwined.”

Prince Charles has famously criticized modern architecture. The Guardian in turn said he was a reactionary. As Douglas Murphy wrote, “Rejecting modern architecture went hand-in-hand with fighting the unions, deregulating the planned economy, smashing industry and rejecting the spectre of socialism that had almost ruined Britain.”

The late Roger Scruton fiercely hated modern architecture, calling for a return to “beauty” and art that can “open ourselves to our highest aspirations.” He was part of the Britain’s Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission. Professor Sam Jacob said the commission is “clearly a front for the continuing attack on progressive ideas about architecture and cities” and claimed to see a “clear link between its aesthetic agenda and the far right.” He also says it is an “appeal to blinkered, quasi-fascist old white men.”

President Trump’s proposed order met a similar reception. The American Institute of Architects complains that “architecture should be designed for the specific communities” and should reflect “our rich nation’s diverse places, thought, culture and climates.” (Improbably, the AIA’s logo is an eagle in front of a column.)

Fast Company suggested it’s not completely irrational to “conflate Trump’s draft order with Nazi-era architectural shows of power.” Steven Heller of the NYU School of Visual Arts says “[T]here is reason for alarm in the rhetoric that the king of tasteless glitz is attempting to impose his personal brand on the physical manifestation of this nation.” Mr. Heller was also angry about our poster campaign.

Twitter was furious about the proposed executive order.

Media have already linked classical architecture to “white supremacy.”

“How architecture-themed Twitter accounts became a magnet for white nationalism,” NewStatesmanAmerica

“Twitter account dedicated to traditional European architecture draws ire as an architecture-themed dog-whistle,” Archinect

“The Aesthetics of Empire: Neoclassial Art and White Supremacy,” Contemporary

On one level, this is just the usual hysteria from journalists and academics hunting for “white supremacy” clickbait. However, traditional or classical architecture connects Europeans to their history. This has obvious political overtones, because if people feel connected to their heritage and history, they are more willing to fight for it. For that reason, some journalists and academics are worried about a return to traditional architecture. “We can currently witness a cultural tendency of using seemingly harmless terms like ‘identity,’ ‘tradition,’ and ‘beauty,’ to establish an idea of ethnic purity protected by a fortress Europe,” says Professor Stephan Trüby of University of Stuttgart.

But what’s the purpose of Brutalist and Deconstructionist buildings? Does anyone really think they are heroic or even pretty? Do they not reinforce an idea of racial deracination? Many academics are open about trying to dismantle the very concept of Western Civilization. As Jared Taylor notes, “diversity destroys culture,” certainly our culture. Architecture that alienate whites from their past makes them feel helpless, rootless, and weak. As part of a larger wave of hostility, this may be driving whites to despair or even suicide.

In a healthy society, buildings connect people to their heritage and history. They offer comfort, beauty, and connectedness. All institutions should do this. Instead, our institutions spread cultural and physical poison, and we see the results everywhere. President Trump’s proposed executive order is one small step towards reuniting white Americans with our civilizational tradition.

Graham Seibert #racist #sexist amren.com

Why Older White Men Should Start Second Families

Developed societies are not reproducing themselves. This includes the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, and European peoples along with their former white colonies.

Societies must have children. At the same time, children of our peoples will enjoy better prospects if they can live among others like themselves rather than among a mix of other ethnicities. And governments, whoever their citizens may be, have a constant need for new generations of taxpayers and soldiers.

A significant number of older men become available for marriage. Though some are widowed, more are divorced. Whether they sought this freedom or not, many older men find themselves no longer bound by obligations to former wives, children, and grandchildren. They are free to start over.

Identitarians, who are making the strongest case for increasing the fertility of their own groups, should look at older men as natural allies and recruit them to the cause. Older men identify more strongly with the societies into which they were born. They retain traditional values. They have demonstrated by their survival and success that they have “the right stuff” worth passing on to a new generation. They generally have the material resources to support children, and if they do not already have a family, they should start one.

Men should not be encouraged to fritter away the last few decades of life traveling and playing golf. Like younger men who are re-discovering their identities, they should raise strong families to perpetuate their heritage.

Genetics

Genetics lie at the core of most arguments against older fatherhood. Although the bulk of the harmful mutations that appear in every person’s genome are inherited from parents, an older man is more likely to have de novo mutations to his genome — those that appear during his lifetime.

Still, the number of harmful de novo mutations is small compared to the thousand or so inherited mutations. Kondrashov includes a table showing that in the genome of a newborn, de novo mutations make up 10 percent of the worst mutations (which reduce fitness by 10 percent or more), 1 percent of those that reduce fitness by 1 percent or more, and 0.1 percent and .001 percent of the lesser orders of magnitude of deleterious mutations. However old a father may be, he can take comfort in the fact that a significantly greater percentage of his children’s load of deleterious genes will be ones he and his wife inherited rather than new ones he passed along to his children. The increase in the risk of harmful mutations is probably no more than about 25 percent. If the rest of his genome gives children a 25 percent edge — in terms of charm, good looks, intelligence — it can be a fair trade.

Genetic advantages of an older father

An older guy who is available for marriage probably inherited fewer harmful mutations than most. He obviously didn’t inherit anything that would kill him young. Heart disease is about 30 percent heritable. An older guy fit enough to marry probably doesn’t have it. Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia are about 50 percent heritable. The older husband who doesn’t yet show any signs of dementia is less likely to carry those mutations. An older guy on the marriage market is less likely to carry genetic mutations favoring bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other conditions that show up over the course of adult life.

An older man available for marriage has almost certainly been successful, and therefore above-average in intelligence. Intelligence is about 80 percent heritable. A woman can’t control her own contribution to a child’s intelligence — that’s baked into her genome. But if the older partner she attracts has a 20 IQ point advantage over a younger suitor, she can reasonably expect her children will be correspondingly smarter.

Part of the argument about de novo mutations is that since the rates of childhood mortality fell from about 50 percent at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution to today’s 1 percent, an increasing number of deleterious genes are retained in each successive generation. The older father is one or two generations closer to the Industrial Revolution. In all, though the older father will have somewhat more deleterious mutations, his genome may be superior to that of a young woman’s younger potential partners.

What do we want out of life?

There are other considerations, and each of the following has a particular point of view: the older man, the younger wife, the children, and the state. Finally, society has an interest in perpetuating its culture, values, and traditions and this interest may conflict with those of the individuals and the state.

Will children make an older man happy? Children take time and money away from the pursuit of commercialized happiness. A man whose concept of “happiness” is skiing, surfing, and rock concerts will find that children do not bring happiness.

Personal consumption is a major element in many men’s idea of happiness. They want the latest iGadgets, imported wines, and Swiss watches. Children are expensive, so all but the wealthiest men must make trade-offs, but children can also be a vehicle for conspicuous consumption. Sending them to private schools, exclusive camps, and Ivy League universities burns money almost as well as buying yachts.

It is impossible to measure the value of sex. The man raising children within a marriage can be reasonably sure of getting sex every now and again, but he can be equally sure that he will not get all he wants. The man who equates happiness with frequent sex is better off being a wealthy bachelor, frequenting prostitutes, or using Tinder. An older husband, presumably with a somewhat reduced libido, is likely to be better matched to his wife.

Responsibility for a family gives a man a reason for living. The family provides emotional support. A lifelong partnership gives a man an anchor in life, a sense of stability. Happiness comes with satisfying ones felt obligation to God and/or the church, one’s clan, one’s tribe, and one’s nation. For a patriot, serving his country also brings happiness.

Community involvement

Being married provides a man with a niche in society. Other people know how to peg him: married with children. He is automatically included in other groups: the PTA, parents who carpool, babysitting cooperatives, swimming pool parents, etc. These connections keep an older father involved in society. It is easy for a retiree to let go of life bit by bit as his family obligations are satisfied and no new ones appear. A late-life family poses real obligations, and keeps a man connected with society.

Why would an older man start a family?

Having children doesn’t offer material benefit for the older prospective father. If he is already old, he won’t last long enough for children to care for him in his dotage. Having a younger wife will confer some status whether or not she bears him children, but the tax and welfare benefits of children are laughably small. Ultimately, the only motive is to have children for their own sake, and perhaps to follow some higher calling, such as an obligation to ancestors, society, or the church.

Why would a woman have children with an older man?

Western society has been drenched for decades with anti-fertility messages. We are told there are too many people on earth and Westerners, because of our material consumption, damage the planet. Our societies are inherently unfair to women and racial minorities and sexual minorities; we should die out. Add to that the scare stories from women’s magazines about the genetic risks of an older father.

If a woman decides, despite all the opposition, that she wants children, what are the advantages and disadvantages of an older man? The age of the mother is dictated by biology. A woman’s fertility declines quickly after 35. If she is over 40, the couple may well seek medical help, and will probably stop at one child. This is asymmetric: he has three more decades of fertility than she.

In Western society, a woman who has decided to dedicate her fertile years to having children is in a privileged position for choosing mates. This is especially true for intelligent, educated women, because so many of their competitors are busy with careers. Such a woman can choose a partner from more or less her own age up to the limits of male fertility. Why would she choose an older man?

Financial resources

Raising a family takes money. A woman wants a man who can provide for her.

In choosing a younger man, a woman is betting on the future. It’s uncertain how far he will rise. He may burn out — and prove to be an unsuitable provider — or, he may become spectacularly successful, pull away from his wife and family, and become subject to all kinds of temptations. With an older man, you get what you see. The drama has already played out.

Older men tend to have more money. This is especially true of older men looking for younger woman in the marriage market. They would not be looking unless they were successful. It is also something specific to this generation. The baby boomers have been running society for more than 40 years, and have stacked the deck in their own favor. The baby boomers are the richest generation in America’s history, and also in Western Europe. Younger men are not likely to have as much money.

Men already on pension are probably receiving healthy ones. This is on top of the wealth they have accumulated. Gen X and millennial men have had such a hard time scraping together the down payment for a house that they have not benefited from the rise in stocks and real estate. Moreover, they could well be cheated out of social security; there will be nothing but a dry well for them.

Maturity

People tend to become more stable and predictable as they get older. They know more about life and they fall into habits that have proven successful. An older husband is less likely to make erratic decisions, such as changing careers, moving, or developing a newfound taste for drugs, alcohol, or video games.

Arguments and stress are part of every marriage. A mature man will understand his long-term interests better, and favor the long-term benefits of marriage over short-term concerns about one-up-man-ship or self-esteem.

A woman should enter marriage with the expectation that her partner will be there for the 20 years or so it takes to raise children. An older guy can be a good bet. Actuarially, an older suitor in good health is very likely to survive another 20 years, and psychologically, he is more likely to remain the same person.

Fidelity

A woman should not bet on a man who is unlikely to settle down. A man’s character becomes clear by the time he is 50. An older man is less likely to his affections wander, so long as he has a reliable partner.

To return to a previous point, the primary reason an older man would want to marry a younger woman and have children is because he wants children. The best way to succeed at that is to remain in a monogamous marriage. Children in a stable marriage are more likely to succeed, and the man himself is far more likely to have more children with a single loving spouse than he is with whatever paramours he may find by stepping out.

Traditional values

The rate at which society changes has accelerated dramatically. Members of the silent generation grew up attending church, not cursing (very much, anyhow), believing in the Golden rule and that honesty was the best policy, and expecting that we would marry and stay married. Our millennial children think we are hopelessly square. More than that, they slur us with epitaphs such as patriarchy, racist, bigot, homophobe, and whatnot when we utter what was merely common sense when we were younger.

A woman might conclude that the family values with which an older man grew up are a better foundation for a family than the social justice ideas that fill the minds of younger men.

Commitment to children

Convincing a much younger woman to have children is not an easy task. A man who does so has already shown his commitment to children. He probably already has children. A prospective bride can talk with him about what worked and didn’t, and how he will contribute to raising a new family. A man who has never married may not have given the subject much thought, and except for a few who have had the chance to help raising younger siblings, not much experience either.

Experience

Older men who are inclined to marry have probably done it before. They have experience changing diapers and babysitting. They probably know how to wash dishes and keep house. If the guy has kept himself in shape, as a great many have in this day of bicycling and health clubs, he should be up to the task. A man who works to stay in shape can sustain himself pretty well until he reaches his 70s, but at some point age catches up with him. An offsetting benefit is that an older husband is likely to have more time to spend with his wife and family

The wife’s career

The odds are strong that the prospective husband has already reached the peak of his career. If he is a workaholic, it will be evident — and he will probably not want to saddle himself with family responsibilities. If he truly wants children, there is a strong chance he will find time to spend with them. If her husband has more time to spend with children, his younger wife may find her own life easier. It will be easier for her to pursue a career if she wants, or to take music lessons, attend lectures, and do other things strictly for herself.

Predictable problems

An older man will have a different circle of friends and different interests than those of a younger wife. If both man and wife come from the same country and culture, he may expect his wife to socialize with people of his generation. If they come from different countries, as is often the case with modern May-December marriages, one of them will have to adapt to a whole new environment and make a new set of friends.

For an older man, the better option appears to be to rise to the challenge of learning a new language, making new friends, and adapting to new customs in his bride’s country. If it is the woman who is doing the adaptation — moving to a wealthier Western country — there is a chance the new environment will change her perception of her husband. Not a few older men have seen their tender Asian or Eastern European brides go feminist and decide that this marriage was not exactly what they wanted.

Advantages to children of an older father

The children of an older father will see more of their father. Spending time with their father doesn’t contribute to intelligence or the formation of personality, since these things are mostly inherited. However, boys, especially, turn out better if they grow up in intact families and spend a lot of time with their fathers. When mother and father agree that developing a child’s character is important, it seems they can do that. Even in a therapeutic society dedicated to the proposition that every child should be “happy,” parents who emphasize responsibility and hard work seem to be rewarded.

The good of society

Society needs children. A culture needs new generations to share everything that defines culture: customs, religious beliefs, history, dress and so on. The more fathers, the more children, and the more children, the better — at least in the West. If older fathers sire more productive children — intelligence, personality, etc. — their children make more positive contributions.

If we look at society as a gene pool, an older father’s increased load of de novo mutations is more than offset by the likelihood that he is perpetuating superior genetic material

The good of government

A government needs soldiers and taxpayers. Government benefits from children — and pays for their education and services — whoever the father may be. Older fathers do not impose any special costs on government. Their pensions do not go up. An older father is more likely to be solvent and less likely to be on welfare. This benefit is more than enough to offset the greater likelihood that he will die and his family will go on welfare.

Conclusion

We of today’s older generation have more education, resources, and time than any in history. Although we do not have as much of a feeling for our family, tribe, and nation as our ancestors did, we certainly have more than the generations following us. If there is going to be a renewed ethnic identity among our people, we have an important role. Many of us are already committed.

Awareness alone, however, will not solve the problem. We need new generations of people like ourselves. White people need to be raising white babies. Japanese need to be raising Japanese babies, and Chinese, Chinese. There is no danger in encouraging other groups. Given our shrinking numbers, the world has room for all of us.

We reached the zenith of human accomplishment when we had pride in ourselves and our people and believed that what we had was worth passing on. We can continue to do this by spending time with our grandchildren but, when possible, we should start new families.

Resolving to begin again and find a committed partner is not easy but it isn’t impossible. There are traditional women in our own countries, women who have not been swept up in the moral ambiguities of the age, who are looking for reliable partners. There remain countries such as those of Central and Eastern Europe where a majority of women of childbearing age want a traditional family.

Stop lamenting the unfortunate changes that have affected our countries and our society, and create a new generation to perpetuate all of the good that we inherited and cherish.

Braveheart #racist stormfront.org

It's a Wonderful Race, After All

by James Bronson (part 1)

There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites throughout history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed peoples."

George's dad was shocked to hear such talk. "Who put such commie-pinko nonsense into your head, boy? Did one of your sandal-wearing hippie college professors teach you that?" the father asked.

To which the son replied: "That's the truth dad. My anthropology professor, Dr. Irving Silverstein, says so. He ought to know. Dr. Silverstein is a well-respected Ph.D. People of your generation just don't understand because you were raised in a White supremacist, racist society. That's why I've come to admire Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King as the greatest man in American history. He stood up to the racists of your generation. Because of him, my generation of White kids is completely color blind."

The father angrily replied: "That's bull****! I've always been fair-minded and tolerant of people from all backgrounds and races. I haven't 'oppressed' anybody, and furthermore there's nothing wrong with being proud of one's own people, including the European race of people. Your race is in your blood. It's like an extension of your biological family and you ought to be proud of your European heritage and identity, just like every other racial group in America is proud of its. Why is it OK for them to have a strong sense of racial
identity but it's evil for us Europeans to feel that way?"

The young "intellectual" laughed at his father. "Come on dad, that's the kind of crap Hitler tried to peddle. Those racist attitudes were discredited years ago. There's only one race and that's the human race. Diversity is our greatest strength. Differences in so-called "race" are as insignificant as differences in belly buttons. And besides, UN statistics now show that low White birth rates, along with the fact that we live in an multicultural society, will mean that Europeans and their ethnocentrist and racist culture will have died out by the end of the century," young George said.

Turning red with anger, the father yelled: "You are a walking cliché, you know that, boy? And you think it's a good thing that the European peoples of the world will have faded out and ceased to exist?" Young George replied; "I think it's great! It will mean the end of racism and the end of hate. The oppressed peoples of the world would have been better off if us racist Europeans had never existed to begin with."

Suddenly there was a blast of cold wind, an explosion, and a huge smoke cloud. When the smoke had settled, George found himself alone and lost in a cold open field.

An angel named Clarence then appeared to him and said "Well George, you've got your wish."

George asked: "Where am I? What's going on here? And who are you?"

The angel answered, "George, I'm Clarence the Angel. I was sent here to show you what the world would have been like if Europeans, or Whites, had never existed. You now live in a world where Europeans never existed."

"Oh. That's cool. I'll have no problem adapting because there's not a racist bone in my body. And when I get back to my world, I'll be able to tell my professor and my friends how great this non-racist world was. Say, I'm freezing my ass off out here. Where's the nearest motel?"

"Motel?" replied the angel. "There are no motels here in what was once called North America. But there are some caves up in those mountains where you can find shelter."

"Caves? No way, man. I want a nice warm bed to sleep in."

"I don't think you understand George. There are no buildings here in non-white America because the evil Europeans never came here to build them. Whites never existed, remember? The natives live in tents. Would you like to go meet some local Indians? Perhaps they'll let you stay in a tent."

"A tent? But it's 10 degrees outside?...Oh well. It's better than a cave I suppose. Let's go talk to these Indians...... Wait a second, are these Indians friendly or hostile?"

"Why, George, that's a racist question to ask. Just because some Indians were brutal savages who scalped their victims alive, it doesn't mean they all were", said the angel sarcastically.

"I know that Clarence. And I'm not a racist. I hate racism. Nonetheless, I'd feel safer if I could have a gun to defend myself if they turn out to be violent."

"Gun?" replied the angel. "There are no guns for you to defend yourself with. Firearms were invented by evil Europeans. Though, we could make a spear with those twigs over there…"

"That's too much work. Give me a telephone then. I'll call the Indians to ask if it's OK."

"Telephone"? replied the angel. There are no telephones here. Alexander Graham Bell was another evil white man, so he never existed. No Europeans remember?" "Forget it then," replied George. "I'll sleep in the damn cave."

Upon arriving at the cave, a shivering George asked the angel for a lighter so that he could light a fire. "A lighter?" replied Clarence. "There are no lighters here, and no matches. Those are European gadgets and evil Europeans never existed remember? If you want to get warm, you need to do like the locals do and start rubbing twigs together."

"Oh come on man! You mean to tell me these people still rub sticks together for fire?"

"That's right George. The Indians live exactly as they did before the evil pilgrims arrived from Europe just a few centuries ago." said the angel sarcastically.

"I refuse to stay in this cold cave and I damn sure ain't gonna light a fire with twigs, and I refuse to sleep in a teepee. I'll go to South America. I can make it in a warmer climate and I'll adapt quickly to the great Incan civilization I learned about at college. Since European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed, the Incans will still be there... I need a car"

"Car?" replied the angel. "There are no cars here. Daimler and Benz, the evil German inventors of the internal combustion engine, were never born...nor was Henry Ford. There are no paved roads either. This is a world without evil Europeans remember?"

"No cars! Oh. I'll just have to take a train."

"There are no trains in this world either George. Evil Europeans weren't here to build locomotive engines or to discover the many uses of coal, oil and gas, or to build trains or lay tracks. But I'll allow you to cheat just a bit. Grab hold of my magic robe and we'll fly
south."

George touched the angel's robe and they flew south until they arrived in an abandoned mud hut in the midst of Incan territory. George was grateful for the warm weather but it wasn't long until he began to complain about the heat and humidity.

"Clarence, this hut is a little ****hole and I'm sweating up a storm here. Get me an air-conditioner…please!"

"Air-conditioner?" replied the angel. "There are no air-conditioners here. Air conditioning and refrigeration were inventions created by evil White men."

"What?!! You mean to tell me that in the year 2003 these people still haven't figured out a way to keep themselves or their food cool?” a frustrated George asked.

"No George, they haven't. And they never will."

"This is ridiculous. Let's go to the main city to see the Emperor. I can't live like this. Where's a car...oh I forget...no cars! Dammit I'll walk. Let's go."

After walking through the jungle for about an hour or so, it began to get dark. George then asked Clarence to give him a flashlight so that he could see. "Flashlight? Sorry George, but Thomas Edison was an evil White man too...and he was never born. There are some branches over there if you want to make a torch."

"Never mind that!" George shouted back.

By morning time, Clarence and George had arrived at the temple of the Incans. A bloody human sacrifice was in progress. George turned to Clarence and cried, "They're going to butcher that poor soul! Somebody has got to stop this. What horrible murdering beasts! Can't anyone stop them?"

The angel replied "I'm afraid not. Ritual killings are common place here.” Those evil European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed so the Incans just continued their brutal ways. In fact, it was the oppressed peoples themselves who made up the bulk of the Spanish armed forces. The people saw the Spaniards as liberators who would rid them of the oppressive Incan and Mayan rulers and give them a better life."

"I can't blame them for helping the Spaniards then. This is a horrible place. Get me out of this ****hole now!" said George.

'Where would you like to go?" Clarence replied.

George said: "Take me to Africa, maybe there's a more advanced and humane civilization there that I can fit into. Where’s the nearest airport?"

"Oh, I forgot...no Wright Brothers." George said. "How about a boat?"

"Boats?" replied the angel. "I'm afraid the most seaworthy rafts available to you won't be of much help in crossing the vast Atlantic Ocean. The great Viking sailors and European navigators never existed. No Phoenicians, no Leif Eriksson, no Henry the Navigator, no Columbus, no Magellan, no Hudson and no Robert Fulton. Even if you could build your own ship, there would be no compass for you to navigate with and no sextant either. I'm afraid you're stuck here George."

"Can I touch your robe and fly to Africa then" asked George.

"You're cheating again George, but all right. Touch my robe and we'll fly to Africa."

When they arrived in Africa, George saw thousands of half-naked African tribesmen being herded along a dirt path. They were guarded by other Africans with spears. "What are they doing to those poor men?" George asked Clarence.

"They are being enslaved by another tribe. Slavery was common in Africa long before the whites arrived," Clarence said. "In fact, most of the slaves who were shipped to the Americas were sold to the slave traders by African tribal leaders."

"That's so sad,” George said. "I want to meet Martin Luther King. Since his White assassin never existed, this great man should still be alive. He's probably a great tribal chief somewhere and leader of an advanced civilization. He will free these slaves from their African masters. Take me to him, Clarence."

Clarence led George to a little hut deep in the heart of Africa. The naked women and children looked at George in wonder. The young men were out on a hunt but the older men stayed behind. George was led to the dingy little hut of the tribal witchdoctor and spiritual leader. There he saw a wild-looking man with a necklace of teeth around his neck and a huge ring pierced through his nose. "What the hell is that?” George asked.

"Meet Witch-doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga" Clarence said. He never became Reverend Martin Luther King because there were no universities or seminaries built to educate him. Europeans weren't there to create such opportunities. But he did become the tribe's spiritual leader. He specializes in casting evil spells. Perhaps he can help you?"

The witch doctor gazed in wonder at George. Then he motioned to his henchmen to seize young George. The tribesmen grabbed hold of George and tied him to a nearby tree.

"Stop it! Let me go. What are they going to do to me?" cried George hysterically.

"They're going to perform a ritual killing on you, George. The good doctor King...I mean Kinga -- believes that by cutting your heart out while you are still alive, it will bring good fortune and fertility to his tribe," laughed Clarence.

"Clarence! Clarence! Help me Clarence! Help me!

"But George, you told me that you wanted to go to Africa and to meet your hero Reverend King."

George said: "This part of Africa has not developed yet. I can see that now. Take me to North Africa where Egypt and Carthage established great civilizations. Just get me out of here, please."

Just as the witch doctor's spear was about to carve out George's heart, George vanished into thin air. He then found himself on the banks of the river Nile in Egypt.

"Thank you Clarence. Thank you," George said. "I don't understand it Clarence. Why does so much of the world remain so brutal and primitive? I learned during Black History Month about many talented black inventors and scientists. Garrett Morgan, George Washington Carver, Benjamin Banneker, Granville Woods. Then there's Dr. Carson, the preeminent brain surgeon in all of America. Where are these men?"

Clarence replied: "Don't you understand yet? America, and Africa, exist exactly as they did before the Europeans discovered them. Civilization as you had known it had only been introduced to these people just a few centuries ago by the Europeans. There are no universities, no hospitals, no means of transportation other than animals, no science, no medicine, no machines. In fact, the wheel hasn't even been discovered in Sub-Saharan Africa! Those black scientists, inventors, doctors, athletes, and entertainers you speak of were never given the opportunity to realize their full human potential because Europeans weren't around to introduce higher civilization and learning to them. There are no George Washington Carvers in this non-European world, no Dr. Carsons, no Booker T. Washingtons, no Benjamin Bannekers, no Michael Jordans, no Oprah Winfreys, no Bill Cosbys, no..."

"Stop it! That can't be!" cried George. "Let's walk over to the great pyramids of Egypt right now and I'll show you one of the great wonders of the world ...built by non-Whites"

They walked a few miles before George stopped and asked where the nearest toilet was. "Toilets?" replied the angel. There are no toilets or urinals in this world. Plumbing was developed by evil Europeans. The people in this non-White world still relieve themselves in open fields."

Clarence turned around so George could do his business. "I need some toilet paper." George said.

"Toilet paper?" replied the angel. "There..."

"I know. I know. Toilet paper hasn't been invented yet. Just hand me a rag then".

Clarence obliged and the two of them went on their way.

Steve Sailer #fundie archive.is

The Media Meltdown of 2017 in the wake of the Harvey Weinstein disclosures is, to say the least, ironic. Why has the feminism-promoting media industry turned out to be the worst offender in abusing young women?

For example, PBS star Charlie Rose was taken down on Monday for decades of unmitigated horndoggery around his bevy of lovely young lady producers, known in the business as Charlie’s Angels.

Also on Monday The New York Times’ anti-Trump White House correspondent Glenn Thrush was suspended.

And by the time you read this, there will likely be others.

Now, it’s almost certain that some largely innocent men will be swept up in the mounting hysteria.

After all, the definition of sexual harassment as “unwanted sexual advances” is a logical morass. As I pointed out in 1992 when forecasting that the incoming Clinton administration would be rocked by a sexual-harassment scandal:

"What self-respecting woman would admit that no man had ever made an unwanted sexual advance toward her? She’d be admitting either that no man’s ever made her a sexual advance or that she’s never met a sexual advance she didn’t like."

On the other hand, most of the guys who have taken a fall so far, such as movie moguls Harvey Weinstein and Brett Ratner, have been notorious jerks.

After all, the fellows shamed so far are largely not random Republicans, as they were supposed to be. Instead, they are primarily Democratic Party made men. For example, Ratner, who got his start in showbiz procuring white girls for rap mogul Russell Simmons, hosted a 2007 fund-raiser attended by Hillary at his infamous Hilhaven swinging bachelor pad.

Granted, one reason the media have ended up exposing themselves is because their stories tend to be more interesting. In contrast, there is currently a sizable sex-abuse scandal going on at the leftist Service Employees International Union, which represents janitors and hotel maids.
You might not have heard about it yet, in part because the SEIU is a stalwart of the Democratic Party and its plan to rig American elections by importing millions of foreign ringers. For years, SEIU’s largely Jewish leadership has been selling out the economic interests of its largely Hispanic members by demanding more immigration to create more Democratic voters.

But another reason that the SEIU scandal story isn’t as sexy as the media scandals is that janitors, maids, and union staffers are unglamorous and kind of depressing. Who wants to read about them?

For years the press has been telling us that industries that hire mostly men—such as computer programming, defense, and the military—must be bad for women. No doubt, it is explained, all those horrible, evil male engineers must be teaming up to exploit the handful of female employees. After all, men and women are enemy genders. I mean, that’s what every lesbian women’s-studies professor says, and they wouldn’t have any incentive to lie, would they?
Therefore, women must be given much more in the way of affirmative-action quotas in technology companies. Similarly, the Obama administration went to war against the armed services over the purported “epidemic of rape in the military” that turned out to be only slightly more real than Haven Monahan’s fraternity-house gang rape on broken glass.

Instead, however, we see that careers where women are most abundant and most ambitious, such as television and movies, are where they are most exploited.

Why? It’s simple supply and demand.

Conversely, just as women got the vote way back in 1870 in the frontier states of Wyoming and Utah because cowboys wanted to encourage schoolmarms to migrate, women tend to be treated rather well by lonely male employees in industries where they are rare.

For example, secretaries at midcentury Lockheed Aircraft, such as my mother and her friends, tended to do quite well for themselves in acquiring husbands. After my mother was widowed when her Marine first husband was killed in combat on Iwo Jima in early 1945, she found my engineer father. They were married from 1946 until her death in 1998.

My father wasn’t a genius engineer. His career was spent figuring out how to keep the more brilliant designers’ envelope-pushing airplanes, such as the F-104, from crashing. And he was socially awkward. But he was a good man.

My mother’s best friend married another engineer, Henry Combs. They were married from 1948 until her death in 2013. Ben Rich called Henry a “genius” in his superb memoir Skunk Works about Lockheed’s legendary R&D wing that Rich led. Combs became the technical director of the Skunk Works and, according to Rich, was the chief designer of the 2,000-mph SR-71, the most awesome airplane ever built.

The founder of the Skunk Works, Kelly Johnson, America’s most famous aeronautical engineer, married a girl in the Lockheed accounting department in 1937. When she was dying in 1969, she explained to Kelly that he was too busy to take care of himself, so she had arranged for him to marry his secretary, which he did. When his second wife was dying, she in turn found a third wife for him.

But that was Kelly Johnson in the bad old days in a conservative industry. In contrast, in progressive media industries in feminist 2017, alpha males like Weinstein and Rose treat women more like Ismail the Bloodthirsty did.

The female sex has shown that their emotional responses have not yet evolved to deal well with modern visual media. Women tend to be too impressed by the men on screen and too hell-bent to get themselves on screen.

In one of Philip Roth’s lesser novels, The Dying Animal, the narrator is a 62-year-old college professor who seduces one of his undergraduate students every semester and then discards her for a new one the following semester. How does the old dog do it? He moonlights on the local PBS channel as an arts expert for a few minutes per week. This might not seem like much fame, but for a 19-year-old coed, Roth’s narrator explains, “They are helplessly drawn to celebrity, however inconsiderable mine may be.”

Likewise, in the real world, an anonymous TV anchorman explained in 2004:

"At the producing level, it’s all young women, 99 percent of whom have no chance of being on TV. They like being in TV and they like powerful men. Each host has around him lots of good-looking, unmarried women. Women are excited by power, let’s be totally clear."

Likewise, lots of women want to be on screen themselves. A female producer at CNN complained thirteen years ago:

"In the last 10 years or so, it seems there are more and more young, pretty women who are just dying to be on television…. It’s just about being on television, and they’ll do anything to get there—among those things, being treated poorly."

Of course, there is little effective solidarity among women in the media business. As a female CNN producer noted:

"There aren’t that many female executive producers. And they’re mean to those girls who are pretty and want to be on television."

There’s probably not a lot we can do about this, except to not pay so much heed to people on screen who lecture us about their superior morality.

CH #racist heartiste.wordpress.com

One day, skedaddles in fear from a school bus unloading ghetto teens.

Next day, sings the praises of the Hidden Figures movie.

***

COGDIS isn’t a mental bias to overcome for the typical shitlib, it’s a call to arms.

PS The premise of Hidden Figures — that a trio of sassy black women put men on the moon — is thoroughly debunked as just another anti-White goyim Pedowood production. Don’t expect whitest NPR to report on the debunking any time soon.

The next phase of the leftoid equalism project — which we are currently watching kick into high gear — is to sanitize White men from their historical achievements, like that unlucky victim of the purges scrubbed clean from a Soviet photo of Stalin and his lackeys.

The good news, if there is any, is that Whites, and White men in particular, are WAKING THE FUCK UP to the endless leftoid legacy media, entertainment, government, and academia agitprop campaign to demonize, disparage, displace, and dispossess them from the nations they and their ancestors built from the fucking GROUND UP. Uncucked Whites have begun to see clearly their role as designated targets, and are refusing to cooperate. This is what’s driving the Left batshit insane with point-and-sputtering rage.

By hot lead or cold affidavit, Civil War 2 is coming. You read it here.

Nero Augustus #wingnut #dunning-kruger #psycho identitydixie.com

[From "What Makes a Man?"]

Slaves and Citizens
Wow, look at you. Mommy’s big boy, all grown up. You can do anything, now that you’re an adult. You can eat all the cake, drink all the craft beer, and watch all the porn into the wee hours of the morning because nobody can limit your consumption now that you’ve shed the trappings of childhood and become a man. Or, have you?

Take a step back and look at who you have become. Today, the average American male is a pale specter of manliness that was present just a few generations prior. Grip strength tested today is down 20% over a span of 30 years. We spend more time indoors and are sedentary, our short-term memory is basically non-existent and we’re sicker than ever. Compare yourself to men of the past and ask if you really deserve the same title as them.

Comparing the Greek words Aner vs Anthropos reveals us how a distinction that once existed between men and the rest. Real men have been, and will always be, rare – while all others will just be shadow figures. While both terms described human males, aner went farther, to distinguish said men as those who were more than just the base. Consumers, and modern NPCs, all fit the definition of anthropos. They do not rise in any discernible way past the flesh heap of common man. Therefore, they do not deserve any higher title than that. Why then would there be no further distinctions between the two?

Slave Societies and the Military State
The great slave societies of the past included, but were not limited to, the Greek city states, the Roman Empire, and the antebellum South. Each of these civilizations maintained large slave populations that constituted significant portions of their labor force. Sparta stands out as one of the most stark examples of a slave society in that slaves, or helots, constituted around 80% of Sparta’s population. The slave population, at its peak, in Dixie constituted around 33%, despite being a mere 13% of the total U.S. population. Being that Sparta, and to a lesser extent other slave societies, contained so many slaves, there were constant and realistic fears of slave uprisings that could threaten the lives and business interests of the rest of the population. It is no coincidence that each of the great slave societies maintained strong military traditions and standing forces at the ready to check against uprisings.

[...]

The South, like other great slave societies, was not just a militaristic one, but the sort of society that simultaneously fosters a culture in which social refinement blooms. Southern poets, authors, artists and statesmen were, more often than not, the leading talents in their fields, even after the end of the War. Southern military schools did, and have continued, to produce leaders in many fields disproportionate to their competitor schools. The Southern military tradition even continues today with over 50% of the combat forces of the United States being produced by the Southern states, wholly disproportionate with the country’s population.

[...]

As in the novel Starship Troopers, you could not vote or become a citizen if you did not complete your military service requirements. The end product of this agoge and military service allowed the numerically disadvantaged Spartans to reign over their more numerous helots with an iron fist, while simultaneously warding off enemy nations. Compared to the heroic Greek soldiers of other city states, the Spartans were, for the most part, the professional elites. Not only this, Sparta was also home to some of the most iconic artists and architects of the time, something that similarly occurs in other great slave societies. The agoge was such a revered system that nobles, from all around the Greek world, would fight for a chance to send their child through the same system.

All this and more was required just for Spartans to attain the rights and privileges that you, as that special grown-up boy that you are, think you are entitled to. What though have you done to earn said rights? While you may believe that the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are inalienable, and God given, can you really believe that all men are equal? Can two individuals of different size, or even importance, be entitled to the same share of finite resources within their country? Why should a self-diagnosed depressive, bipolar lgbtqaipsuv demikin have the same rights and privileges as someone who contributes to society? Why should the average person even have the right to vote?

I’ve written before about chattel slavery and how the absence of self-mastery would result in your enslavement. How then, can people who fail to master themselves, have responsibility to weild a tool to oppress others?

The byproduct of the great slave societies’ need for military tradition bore out the pleasant side effect that those who bore through the rigors of said systems were rarely below average and often outpaced their contemporaries.

Unknown author #conspiracy washingtonsblog.com

Below, we’ll show that 9/11 could NOT have been an inside job …

...

IV. No One Could Keep Such a Big Conspiracy Secret … Someone Would Have Spilled the Beans

If Americans were somehow involved in letting 9/11 occur, someone would have talked.

Some jerk would have had too much to drink, and bragged about his dastardly deed at a bar.

True, military analyst and Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said: “Secrets … can be kept reliably … for decades … even though they are known to THOUSANDS of insiders.”

And many other huge projects involving many thousands of people were kept secret for many years.

But that can’t be true for 9/11 (even though government officials say that 9/11 was state -sponsored terrorism).

V. Our Government Wouldn’t DO Something Like That

Third, there’s no way government officials, military or intelligence personnel – who are sworn to protect and defend America – would do something like that!

True, the U.S. government officials have admitted that they’ve repeatedly carried out false flag attacks.

But 9/11 was obviously different.

VI. But the Whole Controlled Demolition Thing Is Bullshit

Whatever you else you may think, the whole “bombs took down the Twin Towers” thing is bullshit.

True, the collapse of the third World Trade Center skyscraper on 9/11 – one that was never hit with a plane – makes no sense. But that building, World Trade Center 7, is not one of the Twin Towers.

And admittedly, thousands of engineers and architects and scientists (and see this) think that the Twin Towers themselves may well have been brought down with high-tech explosives.

But they’re obviously all high on drugs.

VII You Don’t Want to Be Labeled As Crazy (Or Worse) … Do You?

If – after reading the 7 facts above – you still question 9/11, then you might need a friendly warning …

If you don’t knock it off, you might be labeled crazy … or a terrorist.

VIII We Have to Censor the Conspiracy Theorists

After all, we’ve got to censor those darn conspiracy theories.

We hope that the above-described essay disproves – once and for all – all of the crazy theories going around the Intertubes, and that everyone will shut up once and for all about 9/11.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

A video documentary was recently aired titled, REBUILDING THE WORLD TRADE CENTER. The official name of the new structure is the One World Trade Center, which was built in place of the old Twin Towers that were demolished from bombs in the buildings on September 11, 2001. In case you don't know, 911 was irrefutably an INSIDE JOB!!!

In the documentary, it is admitted by the building's architect that the skyscraper was patterned after the Masonic Washington Monument in Washington D.C.! Admittedly, the skyscraper is an obelisk, which is symbolic of an erect male sex organ (revered by the Freemasons).

You couldn't make this stuff up! Literally, the rebuilt Trade Center tower is a giant penis mocking every U.S. citizen... screw you America! The New World Order gang are treasonous criminals who are above any laws of man in this world. They are untouchable. The reason why is because they control the Supreme Court, the newsmedia and the highest positions of every office in government.

All that Freemasons need to control any office of government is to control the top office, because everyone underneath is subject to their authority and rule of law. That's how they pulled off the 911 attacks!

Gilad Atzmon #racist gilad.co.uk

The above video is rapper’s Joyner Lucas' "I'm Not Racist." It's uncomfortable for some of us to watch, but within a few days it was viewed by 12 million people. The video opens with a big white man in a "Make America Great Again" hat ‘speaking his mind,’ by expressing what many white Americans believe about blacks. In the second verse, the song takes a surprising turn -- a young black man in dreadlocks tells his story and counters each of the white man’s identitarian generalizations.

Why has I’m Not Racist attracted millions of viewers? Because unlike Western academia, media, politicians and progressives who try to suppress the way people think and express themselves, the artist here attempts to reshape the universe, offering a prospect of unity. While oligarchs and their identitarian lapdogs push us into race wars, religious conflicts, immoral interventionist disasters and identity battles, beauty focuses on the universal. Art shows us how to escape from the dystopia inflicted by the Soroses and their cultural and political mercenaries.

In I’m Not Racist’s final scene we see forgiveness. The white and the black men reconcile. The big Trump supporter and the young black man embrace. Human bonds prevail. Let us try extend this exercise a bit. Can we imagine an Israeli and a Palestinian telling each other what they really think about each other? I think we can. Can we think of a Jihadi Muslim playing a similar role with a global war enthusiast? I think we can.

But what about a Goy and a Jew? Can we envisage a video of a Goy shouting angrily at a Jew what many Goyim think about Israel, choseness, the Fed, Goldman Sachs, Soros, Hollywood, the Holocaust industry, the Holodomor, Palestine, AIPAC, CFI, the Lobby, Weinstein, Epstein, Lord Janner? Would a video with such content survive for one day on youtube? Can we also imagine an angry Jew standing in front of a camera sharing the Jewish side of the story? Will he proffer the Jewish view of the world and in particular, the Goyim? Will he tell us the meanings of Goyishe Kopf, shiksa and Shvartze ? I suspect that we all know the answer to this. It is not going to happen for the same reason it has never happened.

Those who self identify (politically) as Jews are often removed from the realm of the universal. When they ‘oppose racism,’ they are too often primarily concerned with antisemitsm. Even when they support the Palestinians, they do so within racially exclusive Jewish political cells as JVPs can attest. When they fight for ‘freedom of Speech on Israel’ within the Labour Party they still operate as the ‘Jewish’ Voice for Labour and form an ‘all-Jewish panel.’ It is a reasonable argument that the Jew/Goy relationship is volatile territory, guarded and even policed by a variety of means including legal measures.

Rapper Joyner Lucas crosses the black/white divide because for him being in the world is being amongst others. To achieve the same goal, Jews must find a way to rid themselves of all traces of choseness and exceptionalism. And here is the Jewish dilemma once again – when Jews do that, when they drift away from choseness, they become ordinary boring humans, they stop being Jews they become Goyim. Some Jews in the past have chosen this path – they have successfully blended into the universal.

JedRothwell #conspiracy lenr-forum.com

A "conspiracy" is defined at "a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful." The opposition to cold fusion has always been public. It is published in the leading journals, and headed up by plasma fusion researchers, the DoE, Scientific American and other mainstream organizations. They do not hide their activity. On the contrary, they brag about how they destroyed the research and fired the researchers.

Conspiracy is sometimes defined as an "organized" action. The opposition to cold fusion is not organized as far as I know. So it is not a conspiracy. It is academic politics, which are rampant in all fields of academia.

You have to understand that compared to other professions such as programming or engineering, ethical standards in academia are in the gutter. I have worked with many different kinds of people in my life, in the U.S. and in Japan. I have only encountered one group more corrupt than academic scientists: the mafia members who ran Las Vegas hotels where I used to install computer equipment.

In academic politics, anything goes. Tactics such as character assassination, threats of deportation, pulling strings to cut funding or cancel meetings, using the government to harass opponents and demand personal correspondence and tax returns, stealing ideas during peer-review, publishing fake data, and sabotaging experiments are widespread in academia. They are as common as fleas on an alley cat. I assume Robert Park and others were so quick to accuse Fleischmann and Pons of being frauds and criminals because they know that such people are common in academia.

verager #racist #wingnut reddit.com

I went out to a bar the other day. I went in back to have a smoke. A minute later this black guy comes out and talks to me. I was actually excited for a minute. It has been a while since I've had a positive interaction with a black guy, I thought. We'll drink and talk and have a good time. I gave him a smoke (aint chu got any weed nigga?) and sat down.

Immediately I could tell he was trying to work an angle (you live around here? Got yo own place and everything?). He spent the entirety of our conversation alternating between telling me his victories and bemoaning his struggles. He was out there hustling hard, you see. He got game. Ayo you don't believe me? I show you nigga. Jus look. He showed me his instagram which basically had pictures of all his successes - pictures of cash, sneakers, concerts, etc. front row nigga. Guess how much them tickets cost. 500 dollas.

Anyways. His game apparently consisted of coming across whatever money or resources he could beg, borrow, or steal. Everywhere and in everything he was looking for some angle he could work. He spent time telling me how much you could max out different credit cards and scam different credit unions for (what bank you use? fo them 1,500 dollas. I show you nigga you see). He couldn't see any relationship between his short term opportunist behavior and his long term struggles.

What you really had here was a hunter gatherer behaving like a hunter gatherer in an urban landscape. Rather than a farmer - working, putting away, planning for the future. To him, work was this sort of anti social behavior. Whatever he could do to manage to put food on the table. He saw this as a perfectly legitimate means of sustenance.

If you read old books you begin to see that this is what slavery was. It was taking people who were disinclined or unable to support themselves, who if left to their own devices would subsist entirely off charity and theft, and putting them to some use where they wouldn't burden everyone else.

Men who were capable of long term planning would often find ways to free themselves. Either saving and buying their freedom or negotiating some other strategy.

But not so much the ones who remained slaves. Right after the slaves were freed, around a quarter of them died off. They simply were unable to survive outside of that situation.

So the result of emancipation was some good men who are now contributing to society. But it has also resulted in a large caste of men who still are unable or unwilling to make their own way, and survive entirely off the fruits of others' labor, as if the grocery store were the jungle and the city the savanna.

Slavery was therefore the only humane solution to this problem. If you remove slavery and remove welfare, these sorts of people will starve or turn to banditry. If you remove slavery and implement welfare they will merely subsist off welfare. So either solution is wicked.

Many slavers saw what they were doing as a noble thing, and many slaves were hardly worth the cost of keeping around but were done so out of noblesse oblige. Slaves were not some great source of wealth and productivity by and large.

And in order to fix society, all men who are persistently on welfare should be sold back into slavery.

TL;DR Award

For excellence in crazy that defies condensing

Brad Watson_Miami #conspiracy kiwifarms.net

[font=sans-serif](Admin Note: I'm not accepting any additional quotes of this gentleman for at least two weeks. If you want to submit anything else from him after that, it must be fewer than 500 words. That's an excellent general rule of thumb to keep in mind for all submissions. However, it's now mandatory for submissions of this fellow to be accepted, because I let this obscenely long submission of him stand almost as-is, and I don't want that to set a precedent. With that said, on with the show!! If you love batshit insanity, then you're in for a real treat, especially if you can make it through the whole thing. I've even bookmarked this quote as a reminder to nominate it for something in the next FSTDT Awards. –shy)[/font]
_

Since you want to peer review my work, here it is - GOD=7_4 Theory condensed into http://GOD704.wikia.com ...

Plan-it Theory: GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 on Planet Nestor; FIG=6|7 (Design Worlds Theory)

Our planet and all 'true Earth-like plan-its' were designed through a simple mathematical model/program/ algorithm/physics law/initial condition/'fractal'/code of GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 that includes...

Variations of 7_4: 7+4, 7-4, 7×4, 7÷4, 7.4, 74, 47, 704, 407, 7004, 4÷7, 4 7s, 7 4s, 77 77, 7 40, etc.

most common are 7+4, 7-4, 7×4, 74, 47, 704 (GOD), and 7004 (GOOD)

Variations of 6_4: 6+4, 6-4, 6×4, 6÷4, 6.4, 64, 46, 604, 406, 6004, 4÷6, 4 6s, 6 4s, 66 66, 6 40, etc.

most common are 6+4, 6-4, 6×4, 64, 46, 604 (FOD), and 6004 (FOOD)
_

"Think not of what you see, think of what it took to produce what you see." "There is an order beneath the seeming chaos...an underlying order governed by simple74 mathematics." - PBS Fractals

"Without imperfection, neither you nor I would exist." - Stephen Hawking

"Unless a theory can be explained to a child, the theory is probably useless." - Albert Einstein

"To understand is to perceive patterns." - Jason Silva, host of Brain Games on National Geographic Channel

I've discovered a very simple repetitive numerical pattern that's prevalent throughout Nature and global culture that I call Plan-it Theory of GOD=7_4. Actually, this simple combination of 7 & 4 was first recognized by the ancient Mesopotamians/Sumerians, Egyptians, Greeks, Hebrews, Romans, Indians, Chinese and others in the heavens and expressed through the precept of "As Above, So Below" which became the leading principle of the practice of sacred geometry. The ancients observed what we call the 7 Classical Planets or 7 Naked-Eye Planets: Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn and 4 of these don't cast shadows on Earth (Venus can on a moonless night); 4 can't be easily seen during the day (Venus can be). (Now we know that 4 are rocky celestial objects.) The 7 lamp/4 branched Hebrew temple menorah mystically represented this. The 7 Planets of the Ancients were known by those of classical antiquity as the 7 Wanderers, 7 Sacred Planets, 7 Luminaires, 7 Governors, or 7 Heavens.

The Sumerians were the first to keep written astronomical records, keep track of the 4 Great Patterns of Nature (day, lunar 'moonths', lunar year, and solar year), 4 seasons, and built their observatories/temples - ziggurats - to be 7 levels high (six stories). They also observed the 4 lunar phases being roughly 7 days (~7.4 days) each (varying due to apogee and perigee). Lunar year + 7 day week + 4 days = 365 day solar year.

Our Roman Calendar has 7 thirty-one day months + 4 thirty day months + February's 28 (7×4) days.

The ancients observed Mars as returning to the same position against the background of the stars and is in the same relationship to Earth and the Sun every 47 years.

The Big Dipper consists of 7 stars with 4 making up the quadrilateral bowl of the ladle. Its 4th star in the middle is its brightest. The Big Dipper points toward the Star Polaris which is the tip of the handle of the Little Dipper which is also 7 stars with 4 making-up its bowl. Polaris has been the North Star since around the time the Roman Empire fell in 476 AD.

Orion consists of 7 stars with 4 making up his shoulders and feet. (The remaining three stars make up the easily recognizable Orion's Belt.) Pleiades or the 7 Sisters is the 4th most recognizable asterism.

The Sumerians, Egyptians, and Hebrews took the regular cubits of 6 palms × 4 fingers = 24 digits (see Leonardo da Vinci's Vitruvian Man) and added a palm to create the sacred royal cubits of 7 palms × 4 fingers = 28 digits. Pharaoh Djoser's Step-Pyramid (7 levels & 4 sides), the Sphinx, Pyramids of Giza - all Egyptian sacred buildings - were designed by their architects using the 7 & 4 combination to invoke the heavenly gods.

The Greeks and Romans were the first to recognize the ring finger which when palms are up is the 7th finger from the right and 4th from the left. Wedding7 ring4.

Judaism, Christianity, Islam & Buddhism are strongly encoded with GOD=7_4

"On Earth as it is in the heavens." - The Lord's Prayer (Jesus' rewording of "As Above, So Below.")

[Hebrew text here] (translation) "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth." - Bereshit 1:1 / Genasis74 1:1. The original Hebrew of the first verse of the Bible has 7 words and 28 letters (7×4); it's God's Signature.

"The Hebrew scriptures begin - not from the first person perspective of some man's understanding of God - but from an omniscient third person perspective, a Voice that reveals the Glorious Power that created the entire cosmos by means of His Word." - http://www.hebrew4christians.com/Scripture/Parashah/Summaries/Bereshit/bereshit.html

Gn 1:14, "God said, 'Let there be a system of light-bearers in the vault of the sky to separate day from night, and they shall serve as signs and for festive seasons, and for cycles of days, months and years (and omens of eclipses)...God saw it as good...a 4th day (of 7)." Gn 7:4 introduces the recurring theme of the #40, "For in 7 days it will rain for 40 days and 40 nights". Besides Noah, there were 7 on the Ark and 4 were the married women. Pharaoh's dream related to Joseph of the "7 plump cows, 7 lean ones, 7 plump heads of grain and 7 lean ones" - Gn 41:1-7. The 4th Commandment of "Keep the 7th day holy". Moses, Aaron, his two sons and 70 elders were on Mt. Sinai - 74 altogether. 7 times Moses did the #40. "Selah" used 74 times in the Bible (71 in Psalms & 3 in Habakkuk), King4 letters Solomon7 began building his Temple in the 4th year of his reign and it took 7 years to complete, etc. until the "7 Seals" are opened, yet produce only "4 Horsemen" in The Revelation Chapters 5-8.

John4,47 the Baptist7 was born on Thursday November 12, 7 BC / 12.11.747 AUC / 20 Heshvan 3755 HC.

Y'shua74/Joshua74/IESVS74/Jesus74=J10+E5+S19+U21+S19 was born on Saturday April 17, 6 BC / 17.4.748 AUC / 29 Nisan 3755 HC [1]. The Jewish74 Messiah74 - the king74 of the Judeans74 - received 39 lashes and was nailed on74 the Cross74 on the first day of Passover Friday April 7, 30 AD / 7.4.783 AUC / 14 Nisan 3790 HC. Mother Mary was born in 19 BC and was 47-years-old when Jesus was crucified.

With 7 loaves of bread, Jesus fed 4,000 - Matthew 15:34-38, Mark 8:20.

"Anytime an idea19 is connect74ed to nature, it's not only logical, it's inevitable."

In Mecca, Muslim pilgrims observe Hajj & Umrah with Tawaf: the circumambulation of the 4-sided Kaaba 7 times with three fast pace rounds on the outside (ramal) and 4 ordinary pace on the inside. The Qur'an refers to the "7 Heavens".

Freemasonry and GOD=7_4

Knowledge of sacred geometry and the sacred combination of 7 & 4 has been passed on by the ancients through the centuries by the sacred Mystery schools and operative masons of many cultures. The Freemasons have been documented as using the GOD=7_4 Code for five centuries now in several very important places and events, i.e. the Old Course at St. Andrews, Scotland and 24 June74 1717 when 4 London74 Lodges47 formed the first Grand Lodge.

GOD=7_4, 7/4=July 4th which Commanding General & Grand Master Mason47 George Washington (VA & Continental Army) marked in 1775 with his General Order declaring, "The United Provinces of North America." He'd eventually have 74 generals in the Continental Army (33 were Masons). The Declaration of Independence was signed on 7/4/1776 only by President of Congress John447 Hancock740 (GMM MA) and attested by Secretary of Congress Charles Thomson74=T20+H8+O+M13+S19+O+N14. 7/4/1776 was also marked by the founding of the Committee to design the Great Seal of the United States which was led by Benjamin Franklin (GMM PA). July 4, 1776 also encoded Jesus' Birthday of 4/17/6 BC - just double the 7: Christ=77=C3+H8+R18+I9+S19+T20. 'Coincidentally', Franklin died on 4/17/1790, Washington died on 12/14/1799, and the 2nd President John Adams and 3rd President Thomas Jefferson both died on 7/4/1826: the 50th Anniversary of July 4, 1776. (Adams & Jefferson were not Masons.)

The 7 Articles of the Constitution were written on 4 pages, Federal7 City4 / New York7 City4 and Federal Hall at 74°W. Lady4 Liberty7's 7 spikes atop her head (symbolizing the 7 Classical Planets) and she stands on a 4-sided pedestal with 4 columns on each side. 7 Uniformed Services: 4 under the Department of the Defense, etc.

'Father Abraham' Lincoln's "4 score & 7 years ago, our fathers..." was a variation of Genasis 16:16. Lincoln was not a Mason, but the higher-degree Masons would have recognized his use of the code.

So then to be more accurate, I've cracked the Masonic(7,74) code(4) and discovered what is generating this 7_4 pattern on Earth, this solar system and throughout this Universe...

The supporting data

~74% of this universe's elemental mass is hydrogen (Milky Way/most galaxies are ~74% hydrogen, our/most solar systems' mass is ~74% hydrogen, the Sun's/most stars' mass is ~74% hydrogen, most gas giant planets'/Jupiter's atmosphere is ~74% hydrogen). Hydrogen gas forms explosive mixtures with air if it is 4-74%.

~74% of this universe is dark energy (~69%) and ordinary matter (~5%) + ~26% dark matter.

There are 4 basic states of matter: liquid, solid, gas, and plasma. But very recently, this has been expanded to 7 by adding: Bose-Einstein condensate, Quark-gluon plasma, and Degenerate matter.

Using whole numbers, 4 is in the middle of 7; it's the majority of 7. #7 is the 4th prime number. 7+7=14, 7×7=49: '7 naturally produces 4'. 1+2+3+4+5+6+7=28: a perfect number and 7×4.

7 = (4+4) - (4/4)

1.74 × 4 = ~7 or 6.96

4÷7 = .571428... Decimals of this kind in which the same figures are infinitely repeated are called repeating decimals. The part repeated is called the repetendand .571428 (4÷7) continually repeating without end is highly symbolic of GOD.

Besides Earth, this solar system has 7 planets (not including hypothetical Planet 9): the 4th from the Sun is the LARGEST: Jupiter. Out of these 7 planets, 4 are non-rocky gas or ice giants. Venus is .7 AU & Mercury .4 AU from the Sun (Venus .7233322, Mercury .3870987 with aphelion at .47). Saturn's '4 seasons' are each ~7.4 years long. Jupiter accounts for 74% of the planetary gravitational/tidal forces affecting the Sun. Uranus is the 7th planet from the Sun and 4th largest planetary mass in this solar system. Our Sun's radius is .0047 AU.

The 7 Classical Planets were/are the 7 moving objects in the heavens that can be seen with the naked eye. (Uranus it is at the limit of detection with the naked eye under dark skies and therefore undistinguishable from a dim star.) In 1610, Galileo Galilei was the first to point the new telescope towards the night sky and he discovered Jupiter's 4 large moons: Io, Calisto, Ganymede, and Europa. These are now known as the Galilean moons. (Galileo also used his improved telescope to discover mountains, valleys, and "seas" on the Moon. And he also discovered the phases of Venus, the rings of Saturn and sunspots.) On December 28, 1612, Galileo was the first to observe and document a 7th planet (Neptune) while he sketched the movements of Jupiter's 4 large moons. But after further observing its movement, he either didn't recognize the star as a planet or he feared the Inquisition of the Roman Catholic Church to such a discovery.

Uranus is the 7th planet from the Sun and its diameter is 4.007 Earth diameters. Besides Earth, Neptune is the 7th planet from the Sun and its diameter is also 4x (3.883) Earth's. Venus obits the Sun in 224.7 days which is ~7.4 Earth months (avg. month = 30.4 days).

The 4 lunar phases are a little over 7 days (~7.4 days) each varying due to apogee and perigee = Lunar 'moonth' of 29.531 days. Lunar year (12 lunar months74) + 7 day week + 4 days = 365 day solar year = 7 thirty-one day + 4 thirty day months + February's 28 (7×4) days. There are 7 moving objects74 in the heavens74seen with the naked eye (the 7 Classical Planets) and 4 of these don't cast shadows74 on Earth (Venus does); 4 can't be easily seen during daylight (Venus can be); 4 are rocky. The Big Dipper consists of 7 stars with 4 making up its quadrilateral bowl. Its 4th star in the middle is its brightest. The Big Dipper points toward Polaris which is the tip of the handle of the Little Dipper which is also 7 stars with 4 making-up its quadrilateral bowl. Polaris has been the North Star since about the time of the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 AD. Mars has a cycle which we observe as it returning to the same position against the background of stars and is in the same relationship to Earth and the Sun every 47 years.

4-7 eclipses occur annually. The longest theoretically an eclipse can be is 7 min. 40 sec. Our Sun has an 11-year sunspot cycle. Earth's magnetic field is tilted 11 degrees from its spin axis.

The Earth-Moon barycenter is ~1,710 km below the surface of the Earth: 4,661 km from Earth's center, ~74% of Earth's radius. This is the point about which the Earth and Moon orbit as they travel around the Sun.

Earth has 7 continents (or 4 land masses surrounded by water) & 4 seasons, the ancients' 7 Seas & 4 oceans (some recognize 7 oceans), ~74% of Earth's surface is water (~71% oceans & seas + ~2.5% freshwater lakes, rivers, canals, swamps (including Florida Everglades), ice caps, glaciers74, year-round snow cover, flooding, etc.). Human brain, heart, muscle, newborns, chicken eggs, and living trees are ~74% water. Human pregnancies are 40 weeks (7×40). The average women's heart beat is 74 beats per minute.

Ancient Babylonian, Egyptian, and Hebrew sacred royal cubits74 were 7 palms × 4 fingers = 28 digits (regular cubits are 6p × 4f = 24 digits).

English is Earth's primary language - it's due to a constant conscious/subconscious feedback loop with nature. English(74=E5+N14+G7+L12+I9+S19+H8) is alphanumeric: A-B-C becomes 1-2-374 (A=1, B=2...O=15 or zerO...Z=26). This pairing774 between774 a letter7 and a number774 is called Simple674 English774Gematria874. The key74: GOD=7_4, 7/4 = 7 April or July 4 (Masonic774 code4) ˜ aphelion & hottest day globally, Constitution's 7 Articles on 4 pages. France47's 14/7. Religion74, Judeans74/Jewish74.

Y'shua74/Joshua74/IESVS74/Jesus74 born Saturday 4.17.6 BC / 17.4.748 AUC / 3755 HC on Cross74 on G7ood4 Friday74 7.4.783 AUC / April 7, 30 AD / 14 Nisan 3790 HC. Winter solstice usually occurs on December 21 (sometimes 22) and 4 days later is Christmas and 7 days later is New Year's.

Muhammad74, Hajj & Umrah requires Muslim pilgrims to make Tawaf: the counter-clockwise circumambulation 7 times around the 4-sided Kaaba (4x fast on the outside [ramal], 3x regular on inside).

74°F is ideally comfortable, tropical storms become hurricanes at 74 mph sustained winds (Hurri.74 Katrina74 reached 174 mph), speed-of-sound is 742.5 mph (sea level, 0° centigrade), 1 horsepower = 746 watts, Genasis74 7:4, 4th Commandment: "Keep the 7th day holy", G clef & 4/4. General George Washington as new Commander of the Continental Army referred to "United Provinces of North America" on 7.4.1775; he'd eventually have 74 generals. "4 score & 7 years ago". Many major sports championships are best 4-of-7 games, men's golf championships are often played on 7,400 yard courses with a rating of 74. The world's first golf course - Old Course in St. Andrews - established 18 holes with 7 par 4s 'out'/front nine and 7 par 4s 'in'/back nine; the 7th Hole Par 4 and the 17th Par 4 Road Hole. Golf's 1st rule book was published in 1774. United Nations in New York7 City4 40.74°N 74°W. Vatican7 City4, Western7 Wall4, Federal7 City4, Capitol7 Hill4, Liberty7 Bell4, Sufis74. 74 members of the Council on Foreign Relations were present at the first meeting of the United Nations in 1945. The Dresden Codex (one of only four Mayan texts to still exist) has 74 pages of astronomical predictions. In English, the 7 day week has 4 days not named after heavenly bodies. US' 7 Uniformed Services: 4 under DOD, etc.

The Roman Catholic Church's Liturgical Year: 7 seasons with Easter 4th after Christmas.

Simple6,74 English7,74 Gematria8,74

The spoken word is linked to the written word which is based on its alphabet which is phonetic, pictographic, and has a numerical order connected to Genasis74, Nature and science.

Simple674 English774 Gematria874 uses 'the key'74 of A=1, B2, C3...Z26. The only irregularity is the circle: O=15 or zero, i.e. 704 = GOD = G7+O(15)+D4 = 11/26.

simple=74=S19+I9+M13+P16+L12+E5, English=74=E5+N14+G7+L12+I9+S19+H8, gematria=74=G7+E5+M13+A1+T20+R18+I9+A1, the key=74= T20+H8+E5+K11+E5+Y25, A-B-C becomes 1-2-3=74=A1+B2+C3+B2+E5+C3+O15+M13+E5+S19+1+2+3

English is Earth's primary language - it's due to a constant conscious/subconscious feedback loop with Nature of GOD=7_4, etc.

Y'shua74/Joshua74/IESVS74/Jesus74 born Saturday April 17, 6 BC (17.4.748 AUC) - the King74 of the Judeans74 - the Jewish74Messiah74 was nailed on74 the Cross74 on Friday April 7, 30 AD (7.4.783 AUC).

Archaeology and the sacred combination of 7 & 4

All ancient Egyptian sacred buildings starting with Pharaoh Djoser's Step Pyramid at Saqqara were designed by their architects using royal cubits of 7 palms x 4 fingers. This was the first pyramid built and it was 7 levels and 4-sided. The Temple of Luxor, the Sphinx, the Pyramids at Giza were all designed and built using royal cubits and the sacred combination of 7 & 4 invoking

"As Above, So Below". There's been a great deal of discussion about how the Great Pyramid is encoded; it is.

Stonehenge was disassembled centuries ago, but there are 7 large stones still in contact with 4 being vertical. When one looks through the middle of these 4 stones towards the heel stone, it aligns on the solstice with the Sun.

Music encodes GOD=7_4

G clef & 4/4. The G clef circles the G4 line. In solfeggio, G is Sol (the Roman Sun god) and D is Ra (the Egyptian Sun god).In the Key of G Major, G is the tonic (I) and D the dominant (V).

Sports & GOD=7_4

In football, there are 11 players on a team on the field with the offense required to have at least 7 on the line. The defense is often in a 4 linemen and 7 back position. A touchdown is traditionally thought of as 7 points and a field goal three points (4 less).

7/11/14 LeBron James played 7 years with the Cleveland Cavaliers then 4 years with the Miami Heat before announcing he was returning to the Cavaliers. After the announcement that evening, the Cleveland Indians won 7-4.

G-D = 7-4 = 3

I have a tendency to overlook the very simple and obvious G-D = 7-4 = 3. Sun, Moon & Earth has always formed an essential cosmic trinity for life on this planet: every 'true Earth-like plan-it' must have a LARGE moon. Earth is the 3rd Rock from the Sun.

3D. The word 'GOD' has 3 letters and Christianity's Holy Trinity of Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit. In the Guardin' of Eden, there were 3 humans: God-incarnate, Adam and Eve.

Earth is the '3rd Rock from the Sun' except for when the Moon is between the two.

Pi was first discovered to be 3 as it is referred to in the Hebrew Scriptures - 1 Kings 7:23 and 2 Chronicles 4:2. It's logical to assume that soon after the first guy discovered pi as being 3, he discovered that it's slightly more than that. Perhaps he discovered 3.1 next and 3.14 later. (We know Plato encoded pi as 3.14159.) 100 divided by 3 = 33.3 and a couple is not a 'family' until they have a baby: 3.

Unified Strings 21/19 Theory - Physics' "Theory of Everything" (M-theory + time analysis providing a very simple symmetry breaking) - falls under GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4

Superstring theory (10 dimensions) and supergravity theory (11 dimensions) state that the 4 forces of nature (gravity, electromagnetism, strong nuclear & weak nuclear) are united by the smallest things possible: ultra-subatomic strings of energy74. M-theory unifies these field theories of 6 or 7 higher-dimensions (hyperspace) + the 4 common dimensions = 10/11 dimensions of spacetime...

6/7D hs + 4D = 10/11D st

My Unified Strings 21/19 Theory (M-theory + time47 analysis) documents the macroscopic effects of strings (some are listed above and below) and provides a very simple symmetry breaking with the 6 or 7 aspects of 'regular time': 1. beginning: the Big Bang/Bit Bang, 2. end: this Universe's Big Crunch/final entropy, 3. past, 4. present, 5. future, 6. void(?): beyond the boundary/event horizon of an expanding universe and black hole, and 7. a constant (the speed-of-light in a vacuum). Plus...

4 aspects of 'hypertime': 1. fast-forward/time dilation: moving clocks run slower than stationary clocks and clocks run faster in less gravity, 2. reverse: thought, tachyons(?), torsion waves(?), and quantum nonlocality/entanglement 'information' can travel faster-than-light; in another frame-of-reference, they are traveling backwards in time (natural & artificial wormholes warp space), 3. pause/stop: photons and all electromagnetic waves traveling at the speed-of-light are in a domain where time stops74 in that reference point74, and as the event horizon of a black hole is approached, time slows down relative to that of distant observers - stopping completely on the boundary/event horizon, and 4. before the beginning and after the end: this universe had a birth and may have a death, yet, it is but one of the seemingly infinite 'nonparallel-universes' in The Conglomerate/Multiverse (supermassive black holes Big Bang/Bit Bang [supermassive white holes] into new universes). Using unified strings 21/19 as a foundation means that designing a habitable planet to run on 6_4 can be built64. (10D superstring theory is now considered "incomplete", yet it is still engineerable.) Earth is proof that 7_4 has been engineered at least once. Note: The 4 aspects of hypertime are like operating a video player: fast-forward, reverse, pause/stop, before the beginning and after the end.

Note: Imaginary time using imaginary numbers is the 12th aspect of time, but it's not used in Unified Strings 21/19 Theory.

M-theory/Supergravity Theory
7D hs + 4D = 11D st (4D = 3D rs + t)... 11 dimensions of spacetime

(dimensions [D], hyperspace [hs], spacetime [st], regular space [rs], time [t])

Unified Strings 21/19 Theory
7 dimensions hyperspace + 3D regular space + 7 aspects regular time + 4 aspects hypertime = 21 dimensions/aspects of spacetime

7D hs + 3D rs + 7a rt + 4a ht = 21D/a st ... 21 dimensions/aspects of21 spacetime
(aspects [a], 'regular time' [rt], 'hypertime' [ht])

Note: Almost all string theorists use the term "higher-dimensions" although Michio Kaku wrote the book Hyperspace. I use the term 'hyperspace' because "7 dimensions of higher-dimensions" would be redundant and its abbreviation (7D hD) confusing. Also, hyperspace is needed to balance hypertime. This equation possesses a very simple symmetry of 7+4, 7+4 and then a very simple symmetry breaking of 21D/a st.

"Identifying 'True Earth-like Planets'
All New Worlds Are Built On 7_4 (like Earth) Or 6_4"

On April 21-23, 2009 at the Hilton Hotel Ballroom in Pasadena, CA, I presented this one-page paper/poster at the NASA Conference Missions for Exoplanets 2010-2020; it's been tweaked since and can be found at http://PlanetNestor.blogspot.com . For over two years, it was found at [2] and [3].

true Earth-like planets: those worlds where advanced civilizations have evolved in their past, present or future.

The Planet Nestor - our 'next-door neighbors' - is built on FOD=6_4 mathematical model

Using the closely connect74ed plan-it and unified strings 21/19 theories, I can now reveal the nearest** Earth-like exoplanet where humanoids have evolved. The Planet Nestor (not to be confused with 659 Nestor: an asteroid orbiting Jupiter) is ~4.6 billion-years-old and has...

6 continents & 4 seasons, their ancients' 6 Seas & 4 oceans, ~64% of its surface is liquid or frozen water, Nestor's large moon has 4 phases of 6.4 days each - 6 day weeks & 24 (6×4) hours - and it has 12 lunar months (25.5 days per) for a lunar year of 306 revolutions + 6 day week + 4 days = 316 day solar year with a leap year of 317 days every 4th year. All of these characteristics will be directly observed through great advances in future technology. However, with the new space telescopes, new land-based telescopes, and new techniques that we'll possess by 2018, we'll be able to test64 and confirm Nestor and its two inner planets orbit64ing at .6 AU & .4 AU and/or 6 AU & 4 AU. (Nestor's 1 AU ˜ Earth's 1 AU).

There are 6 moving objects in their heavens that can be seen with the naked eye from Nestor's surface - their 6 Classical Planets - and 4 are planets (+ sun & moon). Their Big Dipper consists of 6 stars with 4 in the quadrilateral bowl of the ladle. It points towards their North Star which is the tip of the handle of their Little Dipper which also consists of 6 stars with 4 making-up its bowl. Besides Nestor, their solar system has 6 planets: the 4th from their Sun is the LARGEST. Out of these 6 planets, 4 are non-rocky gas or ice giants. Their nearby 'colony planet' has a 46-year cycle which they observe as returning to the same position against the background of stars and is in the same relationship to Nestor and their Sun. 4-6 eclipses occur annually, the longest an eclipse can be is 6 min. 40 sec., its sun has a 10-year sunspot cycle, and Nestor's magnetic field is tilted 10 degrees from its spin axis. Their sun's radius is .0046 AU.

Nestor's 'Venus' orbits their Sun in 169 Nestor days: 6.4 x Nestor months (avg. 26.4 days).

Nestlings speak (& spell64) 'Eqfish664', acknowledfe 'FOD'(=6_4) as The Creator, practice 'famatmia64' (gematria74), use Standard/Byblical cubits of 6p x 4f, and recofnize a 'simfle64' (simple74) and elegant64 theory...

M-theory / Superstring Theory
6D hs + 4D = 10D st (4D = 3D + t)... 10 dimensions of spacetime

If the observer avoids recognizing the void (i.e. no boundary theory), symmetry is maintained with 6 aspects of regular time + 4 aspects of hypertime...

Unified Strings 21/19 Theory
6D hs + 3D rs + 6a rt + 4a ht = 19D/a st... 19 dimensions/aspects of s19pacetime

M-theory's universal laws can be localized, yet effects are felt non-locally***.

Sympathetic vibration provides clues to Nestor's existence

Our solar system is ~4.6 billion-years-old. Our Moon contains two clues to Nestor's predicted characteristics: the Moon travels around Earth at .64 miles per second and the Moon's crust is ~64 kilometers deep. Would Nestor's large moon travel around it at .74 mps and have a ~74 k deep crust as a reflection of Earth's existence? Mars contains a huge clue to the prediction of Nestor's 24/6: Mars has a 24.6 hour day. Would a potential colony planet near Nestor have a 24.7 hour day as a reflection of Earth's existence?!

Pluto also contains a huge clue to the prediction of Nestor running on 6_4. The reclassified dwarf planet is 648 miles wide, its fifth moon has been observed, Pluto rotates with a 6.4-Earth-day period and its largest moon - Charon - orbits it every 6.4 days. (Because of this, Pluto and Charon uniquely always show the same hemisphere to one another.) Would a distant 'dwarg planet' in Nestor's system be 748 miles wide, have 6 moons, and it and its 'companion moon' have a 7.4 Nestor-day revolution/orbit64 as ***'sympathetic resonance' of Earth's existence?!

Is Genasis74 6:4 and its "Nefilem64" a coded message from GOD/FOD? Many define 'Nefilem' as extraterrestrials.

Nestlings' primary global language is connected to nature: Eqfish(6,64)

A world's primary spoken language ('Holy Tongue') is based on its written language which is based on its alphabet which is based on simple geometry, pictographs, being phonetic, and its numerical order connected to history, science and Nature.

Earth and its civilizations have evolved consciously and subconsciously on GOD=7_4. Nestlings and their civilization would have evolved consciously and subconsciously running on FOD=6_4. Their primary global language - lingua64 pura - would inevitably be 'Eqfish'. Why? Because Eqfish has 6 letters and its second syllable begins with the 6th letter of the alphabet. Chaos theory states that within the apparent randomness, there are underlying patterns, constant feedback loops, repetition, self-similarity, fractals, self-organization, and reliance on programming at the initial74 point74 - initial conditions - going on in chaotic complex systems. 6_4 (& 7_4) acts as an underlying pattern/program/algorithm/'fractal'. Therefore, Eqfish=64 (E5+Q17+F6+I9+S19+H8=64) and their 1 deity64: FOD=6_4. As stated above, on Earth, this pairing74 between74 a letter & a number74 is known as Simple74English74 Gematria74. Nestlings would spell64 it: Simfle64 Eqfish64 Famatmia64. They'd focus64 on F...

Nestor's Byble46, "In the befinninf, Fod created the healens64 (heavens74) and the Nestor ('The 10 Words'). This is Fod's signature.

"In 5 days, Fod created everythinf and rested on the 6th day." - Fenkis64 (Genasis74)

The 4th Commandment: "Keep the 6th day holy."

"In the befinninf was the Word, and the Word was with Fod and the Word was FOD." - Juan46 1:1

Esus64 Chrift64 their Ewish64 Meisiah64 was born on 4/16/7 BC / 16.4.647 AUC. F6ood4 Griday (Good Friday) was on 4/6/29 AD / 6.4.682 AUC.

Nestor's Qur'ag64, "The 6 ogt repeated verses." - 6 verses of Surah 1

"Fod created 6 healens64 and og Nestor a similiar number. The 1 divine64 command descendinf."

After many centuries of having 6 Classical Planets, Nestor's Faileo6 Failei6 (Galileo Galilei) discovered 4 moons around its solar system's largest planet using the newly discovered telescope. He also first observed their 6th planet (not seen with the naked eye), but their main religious institution would have killed him had he fone public with the discovery.

Nestor's Albert Einstein, "I want to know Fod's thoufts in a mathematical way." "When I'm judfinf a theory, I ask myselg whether, ig I were Fod, I would have arrange64d the world in such a way."

"Anytime an idea is connected to nature, it's not only lofical (logical), it's inevitable."

Nestor's tropical storms become hurricanes when their sustained winds reach 64 knots/74 mph.

'Nestor' sounds like **'next-door' and humans may have a 'nest or' base there. Nestor is ~4.6 billion-years-old and has ~6.4 billion humanoids. Hey! That's very similar to Earth! Music is considered a universal language. Is it a 'coincidence' that G clef (treble clef) and F clef (bass clef) are used in conjunction to depict all the various pitches? Using strings as the building blocks of spacetime, I predict that All Earth-like planets with evolved humanoids run on FOD=6_4 (like Nestor) or GOD=7_4 (like Earth).

Feel free or 'geel gree' to spread this info / 'ingo' around. Can I get some feedback, uh, can I 'fet some geedback'?

Deleting incorrect data

This paper in 2009 used to begin with "~74% of the total mass-energy of this universe is dark energy74." This data was from the NASA WMAP. However, on March 31, 2013, the European Space Agency (ESA) released its findings from the Planck Spacecraft of ~68.3% dark energy.

4/3/14 19:04 With the latest discovery of three potential dwarf planets in the Orf Cloud, I've deleted "& 4 distant dwarf planets" from both Earth's 7_4 and Nestor's 6_4 examples. 11/14/16 10:17 Planet 9 although not directly observed, is now acknowledged by astronomers.

Links

http://7seals.blogspot.com
http://7seals.yuku.com

- Brad Watson Miami, FL 2/3/09 t 2/6/17 11:07

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy truthernews.wordpress.com

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Based on breaking news and events, it appears that the CIA in Switzerland is plotting an Islamic terror attack on the cast and crew of the hit Showtime TV series entitled Homeland (2011-Present) which is currently filming season 5 in Berlin, Germany.

In the aftermath of the impending state-sponsored terror attack on Homeland, the attack will predictably be dubbed the “Homeland Terror Attack”. Needless to say, the attack will be used for domestic terror propaganda purposes in both Germany and the United States.

The popular terror drama Homeland features Claire Danes as Carrie Mathison, a Central Intelligence Agency officer with a bipolar disorder who is determined to stop another attack on America. The show was based on the work of yours truly, David Chase Taylor. After foiling numerous false-flag terror plots, the CIA decided to have art imitate life, hence the show.

In order to provide a timely motive for a terror attack on the cast and crew of Homeland, it was reported on August 12, 2015, that season 5 of Homeland season will take on ISIS despite the fact that executive producer Alex Gansa previously stated that ISIS was “too evil” to dramatize on television.

Gansa stated that “What ISIS is doing on the ground feels so medieval and so horrible that to try and make what they are talking about understandable or relatable is very difficult…It’s a question that we wrestle with because one of the great things about Homeland is that we are able to comment on current events in a way a lot of shows aren’t able to do”.

Prior to an ISIS-related terror attack in Berlin, the CIA has to create the narrative that the Islamic terror group is active in the city. Coincidentally, it was reported on January 16, 2015, that two men were arrested in Berlin on suspicion of recruiting for ISIS.

In order to highlight the fact that Homeland is being filmed in Germany just prior to an attack, Berlin Mayor Michael Mueller announced a 1.63 million increase in the annual budget of film and TV subsidy organization Medienboard Berlin-Brandenburg to a total of $37 million.

In an ominous sign that members of the Homeland cast and crew will not survive season 5, Melty published a report on August 20, 2015, entitled “Homeland Season 5: “Nobody Really Knows Where it’s Going to Go” says Claire Danes”

Among other things, the report states that Homeland’s actors are “struggling to guess what the show has in store for them”, and that that “It takes a bold set of scriptwriters to kill off one half of a show’s main duo”. Needless to say, the choice phrases were designed to foreshadow the impending attack.

In order to sell the notion that Hollywood movie studios and movie stars are now being targeted by terrorists just prior to an attack on Homeland, it was reported on August 19, 2015, that Creative Artists Agency (CAA) in Los Angeles was evacuated a bomb threat.

According to reports, police were informed by a phone call from Deutsche Bank that there was a suspicious package delivered by FedEx to the 9th floor of the Creative Artists Agency building. LAPD stated that the package was delivered on the opposite side of the building from CAA.

The alleged phone call from Deutsche Bank was specifically orchestrated by the CIA in order to tie Germany to the CAA bomb threat prior to a horrific attack on the Homeland cast and crew in Berlin, Germany. That being said, an attack on the CAA building is also a possibility.

Whether the timely evacuation provided the necessary cover for the installation of weapons and/or explosives within the CAA building is not known, but it’s possible. Said weapons and/or explosives could be utilized at a later date in a coordinated state-sponsored terror attack.

German Terror Trending
In order to provide a timely motive for Islamic terror attacks in Germany, it was reported back on March 26, 2015, that Germany officially banned the Islamist militant group Tauhid Germany. The ban was evidently designed to coincide with revenge-like Islamic terror attacks in Germany. A secondary motive was subsequently provided on April 12, 2015, when it was reported that Germany sent arms to Peshmerga in order to fight ISIS, the primary terror arm of the CIA in Switzerland. Roughly 3-weeks later on April 30, 2015, it was reported that a bomb and rifle were found in German anti-terror raid. A day later on May 1, 2015, German police allegedly thwarted a terror plot to bomb a cycle race. Both the terror raid and the foiled terror plot were fabricated or staged in order to create the necessary terror narrative in the media just prior to a wave of state-sponsored Islamic terror attacks in Germany. In order to highlight Muslims and terrorists just prior to terror attacks in Germany, German police arrested 4 people on May 6, 2015, that were suspected of plotting an attack on Muslims and asylum seekers. Lastly, on May 23, 2015, it was reported that German police are “understaffed” in face of Islamist threat, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Islamic terror attacks in Germany are now in play.

German Terror Propaganda
In what appears to be CIA-spawned Hollywood programming for a wave of Islamic terror attacks in Germany, it was revealed back on April 27, 2015, that the hit television series “Homeland” will be going to Germany for season 5. Needless to say, life will imitate art. In order to sell the notion that the German government needs to spy on the German people in order to keep them safe from impending terror, German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently defended German intelligence agencies over allegations that they spied on behalf of the NSA. Since the world’s respective intelligence agencies work on behalf of the CIA in Switzerland, the allegations are nothing more than a distraction. Nevertheless, on May 6, 2015, Germany reportedly stopped spying for the NSA. Consequently, a future terror attack in Germany will be blamed in-part on the lack of government spying.

Neo German Terror Squad Activated
In the event that German buses, landmarks, nuclear reactors, schools, trains, and/or tourist attractions are targeted by so-called Islamic terrorists, the attacks will most likely be executed by members of Germany’s new and secret “Anti-Terror Police Unit”. According to reports, the terror squad is designed to be “something new and powerful: an anti-terror unit which specializes in grappling with high-risk situations like the recent attacks in France and Denmark”. Germany’s interior ministry stated that they will “set up a new elite unit which will be able to tackle similar emergency situations”. Since both of the aforementioned terror attacks were state-sponsored in nature, it can be deduced that the new “Anti-Terror Police Unit” was specifically created by the CIA in Switzerland in order to execute similar terror attacks in Germany.

FLASHBACK: German Nuclear Reactor Attack Foiled
Back on April 9, 2015, Truther.org published a report entitled “Global Nuclear Reactor Terror Alert: Swiss CIA Plotting 9/11-Style Attacks Using Germanwings Planes”. Less than 72-hours later on April 12, 2015, a Germanwings plane was evacuated due to a bomb threat. In all likelihood, the Germanwings plane was evacuated in order to provide the necessary cover so that weapons and/or explosives could be removed from the plane by intelligence officials without causing any attention, hence the bomb threat hoax. A similar situation occurred in the aftermath of the 2012 Democratic National Convention Terror Plot which also featured a 9/11-style terror attack.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy lovethetruth.com

I'll highlight a few evidences that 9/11 was an Inside Job:

1. How do 2 planes bring down 3 buildings? No plane ever struck WTC building #7 a block away. Yet, WTC 7 imploded in classic symmetrical alignment in just 7 seconds. Thermite explosive charges were used.
2. Literally, thousands of professional architects and engineers (2,353 so far!) have signed a petition testifying that it is impossible for jet fuel to cause a building to implode, let alone 3 buildings in one day. There are hundreds of incidents of skyscrapers burning up in savage flames, without even one partially crumbling to the ground.
3. U.S. President, George W. Bush's younger brother, Marvin Bush, headed-up a security company which oversaw all the WTC buildings for 2-years leading up to 911. Marvin Bush And The Planting Of Explosives.
4. The culprits used mock terrorist attacks as a cover for the real attacks talking place. A national day of testing was never announced prior to the 911 War Games. This same type of deception was used during the 2007 London train bombings. By deliberately creating confusion for air-traffic controllers and emergency authorities, it provided the perfect cover for the actual attacks. The Devil is in the works!
5. First-responder rescue workers and firefighters said they heard multiple bombs going off. 32-year NYC firefighter and police investigator veteran, Rudy Dent, has gone on the record as saying that 911 was an inside job. Shamefully, corrupt judges in New York City threatened firefighters with imprisonment and loss of career and benefits if they refused to shut up about what they heard and saw at Ground Zero. 911 Was An Inside Job! The FBI told firefighters who found two airplane black-boxes to SHUT UP! Criminal Ex-CIA Chief James Woolsey Handed Down Gag Order To Silence 9/11 Firefighters. 343 firefighters were murdered on 9/11, and not one 9/11 perpetrator has ever been arrested or indicted. Oh God in Heaven, I pray for justice upon the wicked who have done this great evil against the world!!! I pray for George H. Bush and his murderous family to be brought to justice!!!
6. Please watch 911 Mysteries: Demolitions. The truth never has to be defended, because it exists! It is fraud and lies which must continually be defended. THE TRUTH speaks for itself!!! The video link I just shared with you points out plain evidence that a child could understand. Only a fool, who desires to protect evildoers, would dare disagree with evidence that they haven't even investigated for them self. Many people are afraid to learn the truth, because then they must deal with it.
7. Prior to 9/11 President George W. Bush signed executive order w199-eye, which forbade the Justice Department from investigating the suspect Bin Laden family. The actual attacks were carried out by thugs from Saudi Arabia, buddies of the Carlyle Group and friends of the Bush crime family. The Bin Laden family and accomplices were the only ones allowed to fly and leave America on 9/11.
8. No plane ever struck the Pentagon on 9/11.
9. All of the twisted metal from WTC buildings 1,2 and 7 were immediately shipped out to China for destruction, and no metallurgical testing was ever allowed. This one fact PROVES that a rogue group within our government (The White House, FBI chief, CIA chief, FEMA chief, et cetera) were behind the 9/11 attacks.
10. There has never been a legitimate investigation into what really happened on 9/11. Six of the ten members who concocted the Official 9/11 Story have come forward admitting that the official story is a BIG LIE!!! If the government sincerely wanted to find out what happened, they would welcome all opinions, evidence and help; not arrest people, put gag orders on them and demonize anyone who dares to ask questions. Anyone who dared to call 9/11 an inside job was labeled by the newsmedia as “Anti-American” and a “conspiracy nut.” The greatest conspiracy is that there are no conspiracies. I can't wait until God judges all this wickedness. Hebrews 4:13, “Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do.” In eternity, the newsmedia will be punished for their lying. They're all going to whine like sniveling little cowards, saying that they were only “Doing their job,” and God is going to cast them into the Lake of Fire in their sins without Christ forever and ever.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesus-is-savior.com

Until Hell freezes over, I'll never stop hollering the truth... 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!

If you don't like that, then get your heart right with God. There's nothing more despicable and nauseating that to see Christians supporting illegal wars, Communist tyranny and blatant massive crimes.

Although a new poll in 2006 showed that 36% of Americans now believe that 911 was an inside job, most still do not. The reason why most Americans won't believe that 911 was an inside job is very simply because they can't believe anyone could be so evil to do such a thing. Could the Bush Administration be so evil as to kill 3,000 innocent working people? Could Vice President Dick Cheney and President George W. Bush be so evil that they willingly murdered hundreds of firefighters? After researching the evidence you won't be able to conclude anything else, I assure you.

Do you think it was mere coincidence that President George W. Bush's younger Brother, Marvin Bush, was placed on the executive board of the electronics security company that oversaw Trade Tower security for the 2-years leading up to the 9/11 attacks? Coincidence? The chances are one-in-a-million!!!

How did 2 planes bring down 3 buildings? No plane ever struck WTC building 7, yet it imploded to the ground in 6.5 seconds. Why did all 3 buildings fall at the rate of gravity? You don't need to figure out the science, because over 1,500 architects and engineers have already done so, and are in support of the truth that 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!

Granted, it is very hard to grasp the truth that our nation's highest leaders attend a Bohemian Grove meeting every year just north of San Francisco, where a homosexual staff services the moguls, and corporate executives and national leaders worship a 40-foot owl in a satanic ceremony, offering up a mock human being for sacrifice. Believe it my friend, because it is true!!!

Members of the club have said it's just a bunch of old guys having some fun. Normal people don't worship a 40-foot owl and burn human sacrifices to have fun!!! Listen to a clip from the Cremation of Care ceremony (MP3) and tell me with a straight face that this is not satanic. I tell you, Bohemian Grove is of the Devil. Every year, witches and warlocks are drawn to the Luciferian event. They gather outside of the grove and dance, pray to Satan, dance to the beat of a tom-tom, and summons demons to the grove. It's a fiesta of occult activity, attracting voodooists, eastern mystics, witches and all sorts of idolatrous demon-worshippers.

Anthony Milne #racist nationalfront.org

This is why the presence of non-white immigrants is deeply damaging to the intellectual life of this country. The media élite, especially, depend utterly for survival as credible commentators on political and cultural affairs, people who can speak out freely on any subject they want. Not only do they worry about the fact that they are not as free as they once were, but if the definition of Britain is changing they don't want to be seen as part of a revolutionary vanguard that has forged the change!

Indeed immigration is now feared as something that will undermine what remaining liberal credentials they have left. They find they are having to report on evidence of social alienation in our cities as a result of the turbulence that comes with political or cultural upheaval. They report continually on the crimes, the abuse of human rights and the coerciveness of small unrepresentative minorities who now live in this country.

They profess to dislike imperialism and invasion; they support ethnic and cultural independence in other (non-European) countries; they condemn globalisation and big business imperialism. In short, they support every rebel, separatist and sovereignty movement going. But any emergence of an ethnic separatist movement of Britons or Europeans will be condemned with a ranting, vitriolic language that would make Osama bin Laden sound moderate.

Hence media élites have become schizoid, made worse by the in-your-face repudiation of a Western liberal world order that they have to report on daily in their news columns. The dislike of American and Western values is growing, not receding. And if the tribes in Afghanistan and Iraq cannot live together in countries which are artificial to begin with, what hope is there for foreign tribes to find any kind of security or solidarity in an ancient ancestral country like Britain, a land with which they have no cultural connection?

Looking on the bright side, the Anglo-Celts in Britain still have a lot going for them. Most people view immigration as an inconvenience and a blight on their quality of life. On the other hand, there are more than 50 million of us still living here, and this makes us a sizeable and homogenous racial group, larger than many communities in the developing world (not counting the enormous ‘Anglo’ diaspora that dominates the English-speaking white world).

Further, the fact that immigrants are extremely diverse in appearance and culture works to our advantage in that ‘multiculturalism’ applies only to them. The ethnic British, by default, will become more prominent as a racial group. Multiculturalism could soon become a conspiracy against the immigrants themselves. Those who claim to be ‘British’ will have the misfortune of looking like many of the recent non-British arrivals. As mentioned before, only about half of the coloured population living in this country actually have British passports. In the end, in true tribal fashion, they may end up fighting each other while we watch from the sidelines!

Atavisionary #racist atavisionary.com

To those who are paying attention, there is a lot of anti-white sentiments in our culture and they seem to be increasing at a dramatic rate year after year. You can see this article written that seeks to ban whites from holding elected office in student governments in Britain. Considering Britain is a natively white country, the audaciousness is astounding. That it is published in a mainstream newspaper, rather than some fringe blog, is even more concerning. In another example, a student banned white men from her organization then claimed she wasn’t racist because racism is a quality unique to whites. Sure. Or racism is a word used to attack whites by other ethnic groups, and that power isn’t as helpful if whites can use it too. There are plenty of other examples, but this drives the point home. A significant portion of society hates white people, and white males especially, and would like nothing better than to turn us all into second class citizens; in our own countries. Enough people agree with this that they can publish such articles and opinions in mainstream outlets. It isn’t clear that they won’t succeed either.

Knowing the attitudes of these people towards myself and people like me makes it very clear that they are my enemy. They want to see me and my kin reduced to nothing politically, socially, and economically. They probably would love to see us all dead too; though they usually avoid stating this preference publicly. Usually.

I didn’t ask for this. I have never gone out of my way to inconvenience anyone because of their race or gender. I would have loved to continue on neutral to the whole business of identity politics. This sort of increasing and outspoken aggression has convinced me to take a side. My side; which in this case means my people’s side. Since whites are being attacked as group, they must resist as a group. There are still many whites who have yet to realize this important turning point in their attitudes, but as the rhetoric against whites continues to increase, so will the willingness to “pick a side” increase. In theory, people will tend to pick the side that best promotes their personal interests; at least when things become saliently dire. In this case, that means picking the side of anyone that promotes a positive white identity; and if you look around there are preciously few groups with such a message. Given the candidates, I worry that this may end up very badly for a lot of people. Still, if forced to do so, I will choose which ever group is available and has its interests aligned with my own. If there is only one group which will protect my person and my interests as a white male, then the choice will be a no-brainer based purely on self-interest. Here’s to hoping against worse case scenarios, though.

One method of attempting to turn the tables on enemies, hopefully well before anything nasty happens, is to take their rhetoric and reconnotate or redefine it. By redefining racism as something justified and worthwhile, by showing drastically contrasting stats for criminal acts for example, you could make it so people no longer have to dodge the accusation. In fact, they may even embrace it. The attack term thus looses its claws and can even become an asset. There are many terms which could, with variable levels of difficulty, be redefined in such a way (racism has a long way to go, though). Some time ago, there was a very good article which conceded “white privilege” as a concept worth discussing, but that it was not something that white people just got because they happened to be white. White privilege is a normative commons that white people as a group earn by foregoing opportunity costs. For example, stores where whites are the main customers can leave their merchandise out in the open and unguarded because whites as a group accept the opportunity cost of not stealing. As a group they support the normative commons of having open selections. Some other ethnicities support similar normative commons, and may even have commons unique to them, while others do not. The groups who do not support such commons and regularly steal items from stores are faced with straight-forward results; merchandise is kept behind the counter or there is a heavy security presence. Is this racism? Well, racist is just another word for someone who accepts the reality of group differences, so I guess so. Nothing wrong with that at all.

This is a nice bit of white magic, but I think we can go even further. White privilege can be more than an abstraction; it can be a consciously pursued policy. Basically, white privilege is something whites should actively work towards granting other whites. When given a choice, say you have a project and have a series of different people to choose to hire, choose the white male. Choose the option that keeps the benefits within your in-group. Clearly the government limits choice for many businesses, but there are still opportunities where white males can be consciously favored by other white males. Do so every chance you can get without running afoul of the law (or when the eye of Sauron won’t spot you). We must still render unto Caesar, and thus follow the laws even when they are absurd, harm ourselves, and harm our group because we are not in a position of sovereignty, but that doesn’t mean we are completely unable to act. (The restrictions suck, but it is what it is).

The way I see it, as a white male I do not owe anything to anyone who hasn’t earned it. I especially do not owe anything to groups of people who regularly and without shame call for using the government to increase the difficulties for me and my kin; in the countries that were single-handedly built by MY ancestors, not theirs. Anyone who has applied for a job in recent years gets a constant reminder of anti-white discrimination on every. single. application. I think the constant reminder of the state of things is what is most frustrating. Businesses are forced to preferentially hire minorities over me, regardless of relative merits. If I can go out of my way to return the favor by discriminating against the people who discriminate against me, then I will. Quite happily I might add.

Even so, I realize that most people of any group are just trying to get along with their lives. I do not, and do not advocate, going out of the way to inconvenience or harm them. What I am advocating is going out of your way to benefit your in-group whenever possible. Given a choice, pick the option which ends up helping the white male. The other people are merely left at a neutral position; or to pursue similar treatment from their own co-ethnics. Undoubtedly they receive it all the time. Other than whites, all groups do this as a normal part of their lives and culture; and there is nothing wrong with it. There is no reason we shouldn’t also.

Recently, I was faced with such a decision. I needed some work performed and I posted a job to a forum asking for applications. I was given 10 or so options to choose from. Most of the applicants were ethnic minorities from other countries and two were white male Americans. As far as quality of work goes, most seemed perfectly capable of completing the project successfully based on their portfolios. Some of the foreign labor even had more references than the white males. At the end of the day I decided to use racism to help me with my decision. I gave the job to one of the white males, and the deciding factor was his identity as a white male. I couldn’t be happier with the results of the contract either. It exceeded my expectations.

Though granting white privilege purely to benefit your in-group is worthwhile on its own, it also increases the probability you will be the beneficiary of a higher quality performance or have better work completed. As a group, you know that whites have a long history called western civilization in which they collectively performed very well. There are exceptions, but you increase your probability of success by choosing someone from a group with a good track record. Not to mention group differences in IQ tests. By that logic, you could also use racism successfully in choosing whom to hire even when a white male isn’t an option. Northeast Asians, like the Japanese, would also be very likely to provide good labor. So would ethnic Indians (dot, not the feather). By applying your knowledge of group differences discriminately, you are more likely to get the quality you want. Though, you still have to work within the bounds of the law.

A person who utilizes white privilege in their business dealings is moral because to benefit your in-group is moral self interest. I am not saying that someone shouldn’t have to earn their white privilege, they do, but if they can then you help yourself by selectively helping them. Or, that would be true if most whites would act this way because the benefits would eventually hit everyone in the community. It is something worth working toward. In addition, you are also more likely to get higher quality work, and are less likely to be screwed over. European high trust societies mean that whites generally are more trustworthy as a result of their genetic inheritance. As savvy as Asians are at building civilizations, there is a reason they prefer to invest in governments, banks, and other institutions that are primarily European run. As a group, Europeans tend to engage in corruption less often and therefore their money is safer than with their own co-ethnics.

So be proud of your white privilege. Be proud to grant white privilege. Its a good thing, use it. You’ve earned it.

Tim Murray #fundie eurocanadian.ca

he most significant thing about this story is not Bernier's gutsy comments, but the predictable reaction to them. The nauseating cant issuing from Scheer's spokesman Brock Harrison, and Michelle Rempel's tightrope walk over both sides of the fence was to be expected. Unless an organ donor steps forward to offer his brain, I can’t help Harrison. But I can help Rempel. If Michelle wants data to support the argument that ours is not a “functioning pluralism”, if she sincerely wants to learn about the costs of diversity, she only need to google Robert Putnam + Bob Birrell + a myriad of other studies related to theirs. Or if it would be more convenient, she can take a look at this or this or a comprehensive reference list like this.

There is even a University of Victora statistical study conducted in 2010, led by Zheng Wu, that found that many new immigrants feel comforted and protected by settling into ethnic neighbourhoods and that they are less apt to feel loyalty to Canada by doing so. Or as Wu put it, life in ethnic enclaves reduces immigrants' "sense of belonging to Canada." So voluminous is the data that even a casual perusal of it would lead any impartial researcher to assert that the onus of proof is clearly on those who promote diversity, rather than those who question its benefits. The game is over and the final score is Evolutionary psychology 1, Social Engineers 0.

As if we needed more proof, the “Bernier” incident reveals once again that the Conservatives are a a "Me Too" party. Liberals dressed in blue who share the all-party consensus that rapid immigration driven population growth and continuing ethnocultural fragmentation is self evidently good for the country. Rather than follow the Ford formula, rather than tap into the vast pool of disgusted non-voters, Scheer prefers to compete for the favour of the 5% swing voters in the middle because pundits tell him that this is the only way that a political party can win. Accordingly, he is desperate and determined to silence mavericks like Leitch, Belak and Bernier so that they can't provide Trudeau with the ammunition he needs to brand the Conservatives as party of bigots and extremists. In effect, Scheer and his coterie of strategists are allowing the CBC and the MSM to determine what kind of Conservative is fit to lead or speak for the Conservative Party.

Conservatives need to understand that the number of people who cast ballots in federal and provincial elections is not fixed. It is not a certainty that more than four in ten of registered voters will continue to stay home on election day. The only reason they do is that they understand that all the main parties are mere factions in a ONE PARTY state. They realize that parliament is a closed shop. And that as long as there are party whips, as long as there are virtually no free votes in the House, political parties will not feel obliged to listen to the feedback of their constituents. While it has become the fashion of politicians of all parties to hold "town hall" meetings in their constituencies, they do so only to give constituents the false impression that their views will be decisive in determining how their parliamentary "representative" will vote on any given issue.

Four in ten of us recognize this charade as a fraud, and we register our cynicism by abstention on election day. It is not about voter apathy, it's about voter rebellion. Some rebels spoil their ballots, some formally refuse them if they can, and some stay home. Instead of chasing after swing voters with a progressive mentality, instead of working within the closing Overton window of acceptable PC discourse, instead of conceding more and more ground to anti-Western cultural demolitionists, Conservatives should appeal to the rebels. They should think and campaign outside the box. They should weaponize the muzzled majority.

Here is some unsolicited advice to Tory strategists and convention delegates. If you want to know what leadership candidate to select — the candidate who has the best chance to win the next election— pick the candidate that the CBC and the MSM vilifies most, the one they say has no chance of winning, the one who would, they warn, lead the Conservative Party to oblivion or permanent marginalization. The one who dares to challenge the shibboleths of multiculturalism and immigration. The one whom they say does not represent "Canadian values".

That would be the candidate whose victory will send them into shock and horror and prove, once again, that the political class hasn't a goddamn clue about how the masses think, or any concept of what "values" guide them.

There is a reason why "outsiders" and "extremists" like Ford and Trump win. It is because they are not outsiders or extremists. They are "insiders". They dwell inside the world and thinking of ordinary people. The real outsiders live in bubbles. In newsrooms, broadcast studios, and ivory towers. And the real extremists are the ones who have pushed the extreme agenda of hyper-immigration, demographic displacement, quota hiring, transgender ideology, runaway political correctness, censorship, the criminalization of speech, and the conscription of tax payer dollars to subsidize those who lobby for this agenda — most particularly the radical ideologues in the CBC.

Progressives on both sides of the border contend that Trump's victory emboldened "haters" and "normalized" hate. But the truth is that haters have long been emboldened, and hate speech has long been the norm. The only reason that Leftists didn't notice it is that the hate was coming from their direction. It was looking at them in the mirror. Hating white people and Western civilization is quite the norm these days, and those who spew such hatred are rather bold about it, don't you think?

The sad thing about this affair is that Bernier's twitter comments are treated as controversial, instead of what they should be. A statement of the blatantly obvious.

Porntormo #sexist reddit.com

hmm , not really. i'd say white women are tougher and more tenacious than asian women, but they're not as good and creative as they think they are. Their visual-spatial abilities are weaker than men by a standard deviation, hence the lack of prominent engineers, architects and master painters. The female IQ bell curve is less spread out, meaning for every 5 or so guys with an IQ above 130 there is one woman, and this discrepancy becomes larger the further you go down the bell curve.

Do you think the lack of female intellectuals and patent holders in western society is due to discrimination like the feminists say, or do genetics and evolutionary forces play roles too?

Kevin Barrett #conspiracy presstv.us

Israel and its Zionist supporters in the West have carried out a series of false flag terror operation in the US and Europe in the name of Muslims to spread Islamophobia, says an American scholar.

British Muslims are facing an “explosion” in faith-based hate crimes, which will get much worse following the UK’s exit from the European Union (EU), a survey warns.

Tell MAMA, a project which records and measures anti-Muslim incidents in the UK, said in its annual report on Monday that Islamphobic incidents in Britain increased by 326 percent last year, rising from 146 to 437 cases.

“We’re living through a historical period, not only in the UK, but throughout the West and throughout the world where Muslims have been scapegoated,” said Kevin Barrett, an author and political commentator in Madison, Wisconsin.

Muslims have been “made into the great civilizational enemy to replace the lost Communist ebemy of the cold war,” Barrett told Press TV on Tuesday.

“This has been engineered primarily by Zionists and the major beneficiary is the ‘state’ of Israel, which is apparently the major actor behind the series of false flag terror events beginning with 9/11,” he added.

“All of these events have either been proven to be false flags or strongly indicated as false flags and the Israelis are the prime suspects in all of this.”

LordElthibar #fundie deviantart.com

unstablestopsign: marriage is for love. whether it's a guy and a girl or two girls. build yourself a bridge and get over it

LordElthibar: Wrong. Marriage is a sacred institution between one man and one woman. And no Church should be forced to ordain a gay "marriage."

unstablestopsign: I went to a fucking mental hospital because of ignorant homophobes like you trying to tell me what love is and what it's not. It's assholes like you why kids are committing suicide and giving religion a bad name.

LordElthibar: I'm not ignorant. I understand the harsh reality of life. Don't blame me or people like me for the suicide of others. Do I force these people to commit suicide? No! They take their own lives!
Stop trying to guilt trip people. It makes your side only look bad and more aggressive.

unstablestopsign: You slam gay people with the bible think it'll turn them straight magically. It gives them this mindset to think they're broken and worthless such as myself. Please understand no matter how much bible verses you throw at gay people you're not changing who they love.

LordElthibar: No, I'm slamming their behavior. They are not worthless at all. They can be honest businessmen, layers, voters, and teachers. But marriage is not a thing that they are qualified for.

Charles Krafft #conspiracy #dunning-kruger codoh.com

[From "To the Abattoir : Investigating the Legionary Rebellion of January 21-23, 1941"]

In 1994 I applied for and received a small grant to travel to Slovenia to collaborate with the NSK group (Neue Slowenische Kunst). This art group, which had coalesced around the band Laibach a decade earlier during a period when it was banned, had just upped the ante on their collectivism by declaring themselves a “transglobal borderless state-in-time.” They had begun issuing passports and opening temporary pop-up NSK embassies wherever IRWIN (the NSK visual artists) were invited to exhibit their paintings and graphics. I’d proposed to design a set of tableware for NSK state occasions and had flown from Seattle to Ljubljana to work on that idea there. During the course of my stay I met a fetching Slovenian woman who was teaching children’s pottery classes at the ceramics studio where I ended up. Her name was Mihaela and her name plus the serendipitous purchase of a cheesy paperback exposé of Nazis in America precipitated a mania for Romania that preoccupied me for some years to come and ultimately led to a meeting in Bucharest with Catalin Z. Codreanu, the 90-year-old youngest brother of Corneliu Z. Codreanu, the charismatic founder of the Iron Guard.

[...]

Chapter 2 of Blum’s 1977 true-crime potboiler, entitled “The Bishop and the Dentist” is a mawkish account of a Jewish Romanian-American dentist’s twenty-year letter-writing campaign to paint Bishop Trifa with the “Nazi war criminal” tar brush. Dr. Charles Kremer’s obsessive letters to US immigration officials, ambassadors, cabinet ministers, senators and congressmen eventually resulted in a government case against Trifa and his denaturalization in 1982. But Blum’s account of the flimsy hearsay evidence against Trifa ends before his deportation and death in exile in 1987. Information in the publication that same year of Securitate defector Ion Pacepa’s Red Horizons: Chronicles of a Communist Spy Chief, in which the author chronicles the Ceaucescu regime’s manufacturing of false evidence against Trifa to feed to American Jewish organizations in a successful bid to maintain Romania’s most-favored-nation trading status, was ignored by US Immigration and Naturalization Service investigators. Trifa could not be expelled just because he was a Legionary. He had to be made to look like a monster. Pacepa writes, “The framing of Trifa was a long process that followed to the letter the guidelines received from the KGB on how to go about such an operation.”

Two other books published after Trifa’s death shed additional light on the diplomatic and political ramifications of the “war criminal” persecutions and the goals they ultimately served. However, it was Gerald Bobango’s Religion and Politics: Bishop Valerian Trifa and His Times, written while he was still alive, that woke me up to Jewish exceptionalism in postwar Romanian historiography and ignited a desire to travel there. Gerald Bobango was one of Trifa’s lawyers. His book about this case is a seminal one in my life in that it ultimately led to my breaking ranks with the Gramscian slow march through the schools and institutions most Western artists have been in Leftist lockstep with since V-E Day.

[...]

Central to my research into Legionary history are the events of January 21-23, 1941, usually referred to as “the Legionary revolt of 1941” or “the Bucharest pogrom.” During these three days, we are told, the Legionaries attempted take control of the Romanian Legionary State from Marshal Ion Antonescu, with whom they were sharing power. The rebellion was actually a coup d’état begun by Antonescu when he began relieving Legionary functionaries of their various posts in city governments across the country with no warning. Bucharest’s Legionary bureaucrats and police force refused to abandon their positions and street fighting broke out.

During the resulting clash with the army the Jewish section of the city was ransacked. We have been told marauding Legionaries butchered 200 Jews in the municipal abattoir and left their bodies hanging on meathooks. In other parts of the city Jews were rounded up, robbed, raped, and tortured to death in a frenzy of looting and rapine. There are photos of the aftermath of the “revolt” and newspaper clippings attesting to all manner of depravity, but accounts of the events aren’t trustworthy and the story of the Bucharest abattoir has done more to bring disgrace on Romania’s populist Legionary Movement than any other event in the twenty-year history of its struggles with local police prefectures, the monarchy, and the army.

Wildly varying versions of this legend are repeated in most histories of the Holocaust and Romania in WWII. Evidence presented in the case against Archbishop Trifa included the text of a speech he delivered in his capacity as a Christian student leader to a group of university students on January 19. Supposedly it was an incitement to the violence which erupted the following day.

From what little I’ve been able to learn about his life, Corneliu Z. Codreanu was never a Legionary, but he was jailed after the war as a political liability and languished in Communist prisons while his academically trained artist wife did what she could to feed the family. I asked him a number of questions, including his opinion on the story of the abattoir, but his answers were in Romanian and I’ve yet to get these translated. At the time my translator told me he didn’t believe it. Everyone who has bothered to look into it agrees it’s a slander, but I doubt Mr. Codreanu knew that an American foreign correspondent named Leigh White, working for the Jewish Telegraph Agency, was the first person to report the story. White wasn’t in Bucharest when the fighting broke out. He filed his eyewitness account of the unrest from Sofia, Bulgaria, and was back in Bucharest before it was over.

[...]

After a meeting with Hitler on January 14, 1941, Marshal Antonescu returned and dissolved the short-lived National Legionary State, and Romania entered the war five months later. Jews died during the resulting coup d’état, but so did many Legionaries, soldiers, and other citizens. No one agrees on how many, but figures for the Jewish lives lost were determined by fiat in 2009, and laws were passed in Romania to discourage revisionists.

Anonymous Conservative #fundie anonymousconservative.com

Obviously, he is describing the amygdala hijack that happens when you pierce the false reality of a narcissist’s bubble of imaginary happy-ideas. They do not adopt that false reality because they want to – it is a cognitive imperative which is forced upon them by a deep, highly painful insecurity.

Liberals overwhelmingly need that false reality. They need to tell themselves conservatives are inferior, weaker, less evolved, destined to become extinct as evolution progresses, and so on. Crush that false reality, and you crush their will to fight on.

This is why getting r/K Theory throughout the political debate is so important. Once everyone knows about r/K Theory, dismissing a leftwing idea or ideal as “just r-selected instinct,” and dismissing leftists themselves as “r-selected” will instantly piece the leftist’s false reality and trigger the leftist’s amygdala.

Even better, you won’t be able to study political science without being immersed in r/K Theory. Every course will have to begin with an in-depth examination of the entire body of work about r/K. Throughout every class from that point forward, covert shitlords rolling undercover among the student body will refer back to it in class discussions, triggering all of the leftists in the class. Leftists, feminists, and other r-strategists will have to seek out other majors, in other fields.

In political debates any conservative could dismiss any leftwing article merely by characterizing it as r-selected. Watch as every public debate devolves into a massive emotional leftist amygdala hijack.

r/K is the ultimate brain hack to poison the political debate against leftists. And that ignores the effect it will have when the Apocalypse hits, and the purges begin. Splinter the population along lines of r and K, and every leader and leftist who has supported the migrant invasion will be purged from Western civilization before it is all over.

Then Western Civilization will begin anew, fueled by purely K genes, purely K-psychologies, and with the knowledge that it will only be able to create a lasting civilization if it structures that civilization to continuously purge every r-strategist from its ranks quickly and ruthlessly, based on ideology and r-selected behavior.

On the bright side, in the last month the subscribers to the email list have managed to double the sign-up rate of the previous month yet again. Since I refocused on email sign-up rates, rates have doubled for the last 5 book release cycles. That is purely the hard work of those who sign up to that list and focus on finding two or more people who will find two or more people themselves, because I cannot possibly reach that many new people myself.

If we can keep that up until the next Presidential election, r/K may become one of the first ideas to force its way into the public dialog through the persistence of its fans. And it will have done it despite being blacklisted by the mainstream media, social media, search engines, academia, Amazon’s affiliate program, and the professional Conservative-media/talk-radio machine.

Johnny #racist topix.com

The first ancient Egyptian civilization & empire was comprised of black Africans. But, the black Africans lost Egypt. This is what happened.---------

The black Africans allowed in Roman soldiers, farmers, traders, engineers, architects, lawyers, & politicians. These Romans married black African women. They had children.

The Romans elevated & advanced these bi-racials. AT THE EXPENSE OF the blacks.

The Romans used these bi-racials as a racial buffer class. AGAINST the blacks.

The Romans used these bi-racials as subversives & as weapons. AGAINST the blacks. To destroy the blacks from within.

This is how the black Africans lost Egypt.

This has not only happened in Egypt. In every nation where Whites & blacks have lived together.--------- Whites have used bi-racials as weapons. AGAINST the blacks.

André du Pôle #fundie returnofkings.com

image

The 9th of November 2016 was a great day. We will remember it as well as our parents remember the first moon landing in July 1969 or the fall of the Berlin wall. Liberal mainstream media—almost a pleonasm—are either stunned or agitating. Some of these crybullies clamour to themselves how “fearful” they are, lament on the “destruction of the West”—a curious expression as it seldom appears under leftist pens—or have difficulties to acknowledge that the man they have despised and defamed every day for months will be the 45th President of the United States.

Outside the US, The Donald’s victory is creating waves, too. So many liberals allegedly connected to the Canadian Immigration website to crash it. In France, the bourgeois bohemians who work in the media, academia and everything that constitutes the big left establishment do the same posturing than their American counterparts, whereas the petits blancs (impoverished, disenfranchised whites) and local “righters” rejoice.

In Brazil, where your humble servant lives, the official media is making some tedious comments that deliver a flabby criticism. Local leftist talking heads condemn the “white protestants” and reality shows in a very cliché posturing that mixes anti-white prejudice with a critique of capitalism, whereas some new traditionalists, among whom some have been avid readers and makers of Alt-Right content, are grateful.

This is our victory.

A pro-Pepe Facebook group has had a substantive discussion about where a red-pilled foreigner considering moving to the US after the Donald won should go. To make a long story short, some have advised potential newcomers to go live in the Midwest, in Texas as long as one stays away from Houston or Dallas, in Wyoming for the gun rights, in Pennsylvania excluding Philadelphia and the urban areas, close to the Appalachian mountains if one enjoys outdoors, while staying away from Illinois. Most of those who participated were whites, but I have spotted some Latino and Arab names. Some made jokes on these names but no fuss.

And here the following question arises. What defines us? Liberals have been shrieking about “xenophobia” or “racism” all the time. Yet, strictly national boundaries are much less relevant than before, even for us, even when we all rejoiced about Trump’s promise to make a wall. All over the world we are rejoicing around the GOP candidate’s victory.

American “Trumpists” undoubtedly feel closer to non-Americans who have been dissenting from the NWO on the Internet and wanted the Donald to pass than to American libtards. A lot of us are OK with having non-whites around: we don’t pander to arrogant, aggressive anti-whites, but that does not mean we would have to be “racists” as the liberal caricature wants us to be. To cut in more personally, I know of no genuine red-pilled or Alt-Righter who would have rejected me as a frog, although I remember some stars and stripes cucks blaming me for daring to speak about American politics without owning a US passport.

So, once again, what defines us? Why are we a “we”? Race plays a role for sure. We struggle to keep the white people from getting dissolved into the acid bath of wide-scale miscegenation and dispossession. We want a right to solidarity based at least partly on race, i.e. on lineage and identity, just like all the pseudo-minority groups out there. We fight the double standard that allows them to be communitarian, tribalistic, nepotistic, without being ever responsible of what they do, whereas we are supposed to keep our heads down and be taught everything by liberal social engineers in a world where we would have no freedom, no future, no dignity.

But even then, there have been Blacks, Latinos, and many women who participated into bringing The Donald to the White House. I have a race-mixed friend who supported Trump all along. This is not to say “I’m not a racist!,” afraid cuckservative-style, but to show there are some and we know it firsthand.

It is no mystery why most of us are white: we are united around a civilization that was primarily built by people of European descent. But there is more, too.

And this “more” that, I think, defines and binds us; this “more” is shared awareness.

We are all aware, broadly speaking, of the same phenomena and trends. We have witnessed the break-up of families and harmonious relationships between men and women. We have been faced with the untold prohibition to make the least critic of feminism, “minority groups” aggressive identitarianism, and with the pervasive omnipresence of these leftist norms commonly referred to as political correctness. We have seen neoliberalism allowing a handful of careless, irresponsible assholes sending the jobs overseas, importing third-world immigration, then force us into a life of chronic unemployment or endless struggles against other low-wage individuals for a small place under the sun.

We saw how conservatism was a sham that never faced the genuine problems. We witnessed societies crumble, conflictual “minoritarian” group identities being crafted by the likes of Soros, and the meritorious worker or professional—whatever his race—getting exploited to the benefit of the lower and upper parasites. We saw the liberal establishment using various social categories like pawns to create horizontal struggles and depopulation.

Of course, some disagreements can be found on this or that particular issue, but we all see the same devastated landscape in lieu of the brilliant civilization the West once was.

Relampago Furioso #fundie returnofkings.com

(part of an article titled "What The Anti-Trump Feminist March On Washington Really Means")

Here’s what feminists are really saying when we read through the lines.

“I’m a selfish bitch.”

What does Charlize Theron have to be upset about? Being worth $110 million for playing pretend for a living just isn’t enough?

What more do Anglo women possibly want? They already spend 90% more money than they earn in the economy. They gobble up 66% of public spending from the welfare state while men pay 75% of the taxes to support this gynocentric system. Women hypocritically make up 80% of all spending decisions in the materialistic, extremely wasteful and environmentally destructive economy they later complain about as not being “green” enough.

They then hypocritically say they Don’t Need a Man™ while statistics prove them dead wrong. Without men for the government to rob women would be up the creek without a paddle.

What’s most satisfying about the Daily Mail article was reading the “Best rated” comments below the article. Nobody is buying the propaganda establishment media is crapping out anymore. User Right Auntie wrote:

I’m not quite sure what they are protesting. Women in America can drive a car, get an education, get a mortgage and purchase a home. They can be doctors, lawyers, architects, engineers. They can be ministers or atheists. They can have children without men. They can speak their minds. I’m positive that they can still do these things now that Trump is president. This just looks like a giant hissy fit because their candidate lost. Being a sore loser is never a good thing.

Indeed, what are these women protesting? They live such decadent lives they’re literally killing the goose that lays the golden egg as the future belongs to those whose children will be in it, and the men who made their exorbitant, selfish existence possible are either breeding with other ethnic groups or becoming genetic dead ends.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

Stephen Hawking is a good example of why scientists should not be allowed to vote, let alone set government policy:

The human failing I would most like to correct is aggression. It may have had survival advantage in caveman days, to get more food, territory or partner with whom to reproduce, but now it threatens to destroy us all. A major nuclear war would be the end of civilisation, and maybe the end of the human race.

This is idiotic. It isn't human aggression that threatens to destroy us all, it is science and scientists. Hawking demonstrates a complete inability to correctly utilize basic logic.

Scientists created the threat. Rather than work to remove the threat, some of the very people who created it now want to EXPERIMENT WITH THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE in order to do something that won't remove the current threat and might well create some that are even worse.

Scientists love to posture as if they are the good guys responsible for saving the human race, but they are the party primarily responsible for endangering it in a variety of ways.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesus-is-savior.com

The common denominator in most false flag attacks is drugs. There is a preponderance of evidence exposing the CIA's MKULTRA mind-control projects. Tim McVeigh was staying in the same hotel room with his military appointed psychiatrist just prior to the Oklahoma City Bombings in 1995. McVeigh was a distraction, a fall guy, not the primary perpetrators. There were three C4 explosives planted in the building. Two of them failed to detonate, which you can find on YouTube news clips documented from local news in Oklahoma. But then the government came and changed the story, blaming a rental truck that contained a fertilizer bomb. There was a fertilizer bomb, but that was a cover.

The building was primarily brought down by a C4 charge. 168 people, including dozens of children, died. Do you think that the same globalist criminals (who control our nation) who sanction the slaughter of over 4,000 Americans every single day in our nation by abortion, have a consciousness about 168 people, or 2,745 on 911? No, not at all, not one tiny bit. How do you think they justify murdering innocent people? They rationalize that over 4,000 human beings are murdered every day in the womb, so what's the difference if you murder them after they're out of the womb? The international banking cartel deliberately started World War I and murdered 20,000,000 people. The bankers financed ammunition and artillery on BOTH sides of the war. They failed to get their League Of Nations, so they started World War II and murdered another 50,000,000 innocent people. World War III will cause the slaughter of hundreds-of-millions of people!!!

The newsmedia shows President Obama and Megyn Kelly crying as they talk about Sandy Hook and the evils of guns. What a joke! Hollywood pays actors to cry every day, and they do it well, on cue. Anybody can think of something sad, such as a favorite pet that died, and make them self cry. It's very easy for some people to turn on the tears with practice. Why doesn't anyone cry over the murder of 4,000 children every day in America by abortion? What a bunch of phony hypocrites! They'll cry over a handful of shooting deaths at Sandy Hook, but the slaughter of over 4,000 precious human beings every day in abortuaries across America means nothing. That sounds like mental illness doesn't it? That's like your home burning to the ground and you don't shed a tear, but then you cry like a baby when your car gets a flat tire.

James Laffrey #racist whiteswillwinparty.org

APRIL 20, THE BIRTHDAY OF THE GREAT LEADER WHO SAVED WHITE EUROPE FROM TOTAL DESTRUCTION BY THE JEW-SOVIET-UNION

Adolf Hitler. Born in 1889. He wanted to be a peaceful artist, or architect, but was forced into defending his White nation from International Jewry (the inflictors of Communism and Capitalism, two sides of the same radioactive coin). He rose to become a great leader.

What Adolf Hitler didn’t do, but should have, is order the mass-extermination of the jews. The jews, though, did mass-murder Whites by the tens of millions, as all of the best of us know already, thanks to the White documentation of the truth about history.

Justice shall be done, finally, once and for all to the jews. Justice shall be done by us, as we will not repeat the mistake of Hitler’s mercy to the anti-humans.

State of the Nation #quack #conspiracy #wingnut #racist stateofthenation.co

OPERATION COVID-19
Everything points to COVID-19 as a FunVax bioweapon that has been purposefully released worldwide via various means of propagation in order to exponentially multiply the vectors of dissemination of the concealed VMAT2 vaccine.

Hence, the primary goal of OPERATION COVID-19 is to significantly diminish religiosity throughout the world community of nations, especially in those countries that are integral to the formation of a totalitarian One World Government. Those nations are primarily the Western military powers of the Zio-Anglo-American Axis that are members of both NATO and G20.

In point of fact, the New World Order agenda cannot be successfully implemented within those nations where the citizens have strong spiritual impulses and devout religious practice. The NWO globalist cabal will have an even more difficult time wherever there is a historical tradition of mysticism such as India, or an ongoing spiritual revival as experienced by the Pentecostal and Evangelical Christians throughout the West.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesus-is-savior.com

America is no longer a nation. We are now a banker holding. They're just slowly sucking the life out of us, like a bloodthirsty vampire preying upon his victims. The American has their head buried in the sand. This includes Christians sadly. There's nothing worse than a fool who thinks that he is wise. So many Christian men today are 100% supportive of the government and military, with no concern for truth, justice or righteousness. God never told us to give blind alliance to government. Romans 13 says to submit to the higher powers. The U.S. Constitution is higher power than the government. Most Christians are gullible and naive, believing what Fox news tells them. They don't dare question authority, but they need to. .

PASTORS AND TROOPS BEING TRAINED AGAINST US for martial law | PART ONE

If You See Something, Say Something Spy Society is Here!!! (What a bunch of criminals!)

World War III is on the way! I believe that the Iran war will be used to drastically turn up the heat here at home. I believe we will see a false-flag terror attack on American soil. A “false flag-terror attack” is when the global elite are behind the attack, but blame their enemy as a pretext to carry out an agenda.

For Example: The 911 attacks were a false-flag terror attack by the global criminal elite, which they used as a pretext to start Homeland Security to police Americans. They also used the 911 attacks as a pretext for war against Afghanistan and Iraq, and to pass the treasonous Patriot Acts. The New World Order gang created a fictitious boogieman, slapped bin Laden's face on it, and gullible Americans bought it hook, line and sinker. Al Qaeda = CIA. It's so blatant for those who want to see the truth. It's as clear as day. I'm surprised more people don't see the truth of what really happened on 911. Hardly anyone is listening to the victim's families, 911 first-responders, 911 fireman and over 1500 architects and engineers...

The mainstream newsmedia are the most powerful force in the world next to God's Word. They are the only reason why the Bush administration got away with 911. The evidence is solid and concrete, but the mainstream newsmedia has whitewashed and downplayed everything through intellectual deceit and ambush journalism toward anyone who dare call for a legitimate investigation into the 911 attacks. The official investigation has been proven to be a big hoax by most of its own members. The problem is that most people don't care enough to become a VOICE for God, truth, liberty and righteousness...

AMERICA NEEDS VOICES!!!

Everything is backwards; everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information, religions destroy spirituality, and Bible publishers destroy God's Word.

GOP Tea Pub #fundie gop-tea-pub.tumblr.com

Ahhhh you poor poor delusional moronic douche canoe. It is truly sad that people LIKE YOU have access to the internet and refuse to do any actual research. Then have the audacity to post BS statements that have ZERO actuality to them. But, let me just school you and show you EXACTLY how asinine you and those that follow and believe you, truly are. Those that know the truth are laughing at you and your followers…laughing hysterically as a matter of fact. It must be painful to be that out of touch.

Prior to 2010, the following is what readers got when they clicked on the Democrats.org “History” button….
Democrats are unwavering in our support of equal opportunity for all Americans. That’s why we’ve worked to pass every one of our nation’s Civil Rights laws, and every law that protects workers. Most recently, Democrats stood together to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act.
On every civil rights issue, Democrats have led the fight. We support vigorous enforcement of existing laws, and remain committed to protecting fundamental civil rights in America.

This is the kind of BS spewed by Democrats on a daily basis, and unfortunately the media and other so-called watchdogs are so apparently ignorant of American history, Democrats continue to LIE through their teeth to their constituents, and via academia, to our kids. Despite the truth being out there for years, it’s probably not going to explode until some big shot news anchor gives us an “exclusive expose” bringing us all those facts first, so he/she can proudly receive a Pulitzer…

October 13, 1858 During Lincoln-Douglas debates, U.S. Senator Stephen Douglas (D-IL) states: “I do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my brother, or any kin to me whatever”; Douglas became Democratic Party’s 1860 presidential nominee

April 16, 1862 President Lincoln signs bill abolishing slavery in District of Columbia; in Congress, 99% of Republicans vote yes, 83% of Democrats vote no

July 17, 1862 Over unanimous Democrat opposition, Republican Congress passes Confiscation Act stating that slaves of the Confederacy “shall be forever free”

January 31, 1865 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous Republican support, intense Democrat opposition

April 8, 1865 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100% Republican support, 63% Democrat opposition

November 22, 1865 Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting “black codes,” which institutionalized racial discrimination

February 5, 1866 U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement “40 acres and a mule” relief by distributing land to former slaves

April 9, 1866 Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnson’s veto; Civil Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans, becomes law

May 10, 1866 U.S. House passes Republicans’ 14th
Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the laws to
all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no

June 8, 1866 U.S. Senate passes Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the law to all citizens; 94% of Republicans vote yes and 100% of Democrats vote no

January 8, 1867 Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of law granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.

July 19, 1867 Republican Congress overrides
Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans

March 30, 1868 Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson, who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men”

September 12, 1868 Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell
and 24 other African-Americans in Georgia Senate, every one a
Republican, expelled by Democrat majority; would later be reinstated by
Republican Congress

October 7, 1868 Republicans denounce Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule”

October 22, 1868 While campaigning for re-election, Republican U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR) is assassinated by Democrat terrorists who organized as the Ku Klux Klan

December 10, 1869 Republican Gov. John Campbell
of Wyoming Territory signs FIRST-in-nation law granting women right to
vote and to hold public office

February 3, 1870 After passing House with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, granting vote to all Americans regardless of race

May 31, 1870 President U.S. Grant signs Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff penalties for depriving any American’s civil rights

June 22, 1870 Republican Congress creates U.S. Department of Justice, to safeguard the civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South

September 6, 1870 Women vote in Wyoming, in FIRST election after women’s suffrage signed into law by Republican Gov. John Campbell

February 28, 1871 Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection for African-American voters

April 20, 1871 Republican Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups
which oppressed African-Americans

October 10, 1871 Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against black voting, African-American Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto murdered by Democratic Party operative; his military funeral was attended by thousands

October 18, 1871 After violence against
Republicans in South Carolina, President Ulysses Grant deploys U.S.
troops to combat Democrat terrorists who formed the Ku Klux Klan

November 18, 1872 Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady Stanton that she voted for “the Republican ticket, straight”

January 17, 1874 Armed Democrats seize Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to racially integrate government

September 14, 1874 Democrat white supremacists
seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to overthrow racially-integrated
administration of Republican Governor William Kellogg; 27 killed

March 1, 1875Civil Rights Act of 1875,
guaranteeing access to public accommodations without regard to race,
signed by Republican President U.S. Grant; passed with 92% Republican
support over 100% Democrat opposition

January 10, 1878 U.S. Senator Aaron Sargent (R-CA) introduces Susan B. Anthony amendment for women’s suffrage; Democrat-controlled Senate defeated it 4 times before election of Republican House and Senate guaranteed its approval in 1919. Republicans foil Democratic efforts to keep women in the kitchen, where they belong

February 8, 1894 Democrat Congress and Democrat
President Grover Cleveland join to repeal Republicans’ Enforcement Act,
which had enabled African-Americans to vote

January 15, 1901 Republican Booker T. Washington protests Alabama Democratic Party’s refusal to permit voting by African-Americans

May 29, 1902 Virginia Democrats implement new
state constitution, condemned by Republicans as illegal, reducing
African-American voter registration by 86%

February 12, 1909 On 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, African-American Republicans and women’s suffragists Ida Wells and Mary Terrell co-found the NAACP

May 21, 1919 Republican House passes
constitutional amendment granting women the vote with 85% of Republicans
in favor, but only 54% of Democrats; in Senate, 80% of Republicans
would vote yes, but almost half of Democrats no

August 18, 1920 Republican-authored 19th Amendment, giving women the vote, becomes part of Constitution; 26 of the 36 states to ratify had Republican-controlled legislatures

January 26, 1922 House passes bill authored by
U.S. Rep. Leonidas Dyer (R-MO) making lynching a federal crime; Senate
Democrats block it with filibuster

June 2, 1924
Republican President Calvin Coolidge signs bill passed by
Republican Congress granting U.S. citizenship to all Native
Americans

October 3, 1924 Republicans denounce three-time
Democrat presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan for defending the
Ku Klux Klan at 1924 Democratic National Convention

June 12, 1929 First Lady Lou Hoover invites wife
of U.S. Rep. Oscar De Priest (R-IL), an African-American, to tea at the
White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country

August 17, 1937 Republicans organize opposition
to former Ku Klux Klansman and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black,
appointed to U.S. Supreme Court by FDR; his Klan background was hidden
until after confirmation

June 24, 1940 Republican Party platform calls
for integration of the armed forces; for the balance of his terms in
office, FDR refuses to order it.

August 8, 1945 Republicans condemn Harry
Truman’s surprise use of the atomic bomb in Japan. The whining and
criticism goes on for years. It begins two days after the Hiroshima
bombing, when former Republican President Herbert Hoover writes to a
friend that “The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing
of women and children, revolts my soul.”

September 30, 1953 Earl Warren, California’s
three-term Republican Governor and 1948 Republican vice presidential
nominee, nominated to be Chief Justice; wrote landmark decision in Brown
v. Board of Education

November 25, 1955 Eisenhower administration bans racial segregation of interstate bus travel

March 12, 1956 Ninety-seven Democrats in
Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of
Education, and pledge to continue segregation

June 5, 1956 Republican federal judge Frank Johnson rules in favor of Rosa Parks in decision striking down “blacks in the back of the bus” law

November 6, 1956 African-American civil rights
leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican
Dwight Eisenhower for President

September 9, 1957 President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republican Party’s 1957 Civil Rights Act

September 24, 1957 Sparking criticism from
Democrats such as Senators John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, President
Dwight Eisenhower deploys the 82nd Airborne Division to Little Rock, AR
to force Democrat Governor Orval Faubus to integrate public schools

May 6, 1960 President Dwight Eisenhower signs
Republicans’ Civil Rights Act of 1960, overcoming 125-hour,
around-the-clock filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats

May 2, 1963 Republicans condemn Democrat sheriff
of Birmingham, AL for arresting over 2,000 African-American
schoolchildren marching for their civil rights

September 29, 1963 Gov. George Wallace (D-AL) defies order by U.S. District Judge Frank Johnson, appointed by President Dwight Eisenhower, to integrate Tuskegee High School

June 9, 1964 Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV)

June 10, 1964 Senate Minority Leader Everett
Dirksen (R-IL) criticizes Democrat filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights
Act, calls on Democrats to stop opposing racial equality. The Civil
Rights Act of 1964 was introduced and approved by a staggering majority
of Republicans in the Senate. The Act was opposed by most southern
Democrat senators, several of whom were proud segregationists—one of
them being Al Gore Sr. Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson relied on
Illinois Senator Everett Dirksen, the Republican leader from Illinois,
to get the Act passed.

August 4, 1965 Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) overcomes Democrat attempts to block 1965 Voting Rights Act; 94% of Senate Republicans vote for landmark civil right legislation, while 27% of Democrats oppose. Voting Rights Act of 1965, abolishing literacy tests and other measures devised by Democrats to prevent African-Americans from voting, signed into law; higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats vote in favor

February 19, 1976 President Gerald Ford formally
rescinds President Franklin Roosevelt’s notorious Executive Order
authorizing internment of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII

September 15, 1981 President Ronald Reagan
establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges
and Universities, to increase African-American participation in federal
education programs

June 29, 1982 President Ronald Reagan signs 25-year extension of 1965 Voting Rights Act

August 10, 1988 President Ronald Reagan signs Civil Liberties Act of 1988, compensating Japanese-Americans for deprivation of civil rights and property during World War II internment ordered by FDR

November 21, 1991 President George H. W. Bush signs Civil Rights Act of 1991 to strengthen federal civil rights legislation

August 20, 1996 Bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan
Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial discrimination in adoptions, part of
Republicans’ Contract With America, becomes law

And let’s not forget the words of liberal icon Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood…We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably
with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The
most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious
appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate
the Negro population…so the next time any Democrat claims they’ve been supportive of civil rights in America (and been so all along), ask them to explain their past. “We’ve grown” is not gonna cut it, considering they continue to
lie about their past to this day, and only someone lacking in common
sense would believe two distinct political parties could juxtaposition
their stances on civil rights seemingly overnight.

The left is quite annoyed that myself and others dare link the racist, segregationist past in this country to Democrats, at that flies
in the face of everything they claim to champion, when it comes to civil
rights, racial tolerance, etc.

The Democrats’ own website,
to this day, attempts to take fraudulently credit for the civil rights
movement and legislation, and when called on it, the recitation is the
same: “we’ve grown” and “don’t forget about the Dixiecrats”.

Defensive liberals claim the Dixiecrats, as a whole, defected from the Democrat Party when President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (no thanks to Democrats), and became Republicans which they claimed were more accepting of segregationist policies.

Well, I decided to get some opinions on the matter from some historians.I contacted Professor Larry Schweikart of the University of Dayton for advice. Larry and I worked on a documentary based on a chapter on Ronald Reagan from his best-selling book, A Patriot’s History of the United States.

The idea that “the Dixiecrats joined the Republicans” is
not quite true, as you note. But because of Strom Thurmond it is
accepted as a fact. What happened is that the **next** generation (post
1965) of white southern politicians — Newt, Trent Lott, Ashcroft,
Cochran, Alexander, etc — joined the GOP.

So it was really a passing of the torch as the old segregationists
retired and were replaced by new young GOP guys. One particularly
galling aspect to generalizations about “segregationists became GOP” is
that the new GOP South was INTEGRATED for crying out loud, they accepted
the Civil Rights revolution. Meanwhile, Jimmy Carter led a group of
what would become “New” Democrats like Clinton and Al Gore.

Larry also suggested I contact Mike Allen, Professor of History at
the University of Washington, Tacoma (who also appeared in the Reagan
documentary) for input.
There weren’t many Republicans in the South prior to 1964, but that doesn’t mean the birth of the souther GOP was tied to “white racism.” That said, I am sure there were and are white racist southern GOP. No one would deny that. But it was the southern Democrats who were the party of slavery and, later, segregation. It was George Wallace, not John Tower, who stood in the southern schoolhouse door to block desegregation! The vast majority of Congressional GOP voted FOR the Civil Rights of 1964-65. The vast majority of those opposed to thoseacts were southern Democrats. Southern Democrats led to infamous filibuster of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

The confusion arises from GOP Barry Goldwater’s vote against the ’64
act. He had voted in favor or all earlier bills and had led the
integration of the Arizona Air National Guard, but he didn’t like the
“private property” aspects of the ’64 law. In other words, Goldwater
believed people’s private businesses and private clubs were subject only
to market forces, not government mandates (“We reserve the right to
refuse service to anyone.”) His vote against the Civil Rights Act was
because of that one provision was, to my mind, a principled mistake.

This stance is what won Goldwater the South in 1964, and no doubt
many racists voted for Goldwater in the mistaken belief that he opposed
Negro Civil Rights. But Goldwater was not a racist; he was a libertarian
who favored both civil rights and property rights.

Switch to 1968.Richard Nixon was also a proponent of Civil Rights;
it was a CA colleague who urged Ike to appoint Warren to the Supreme Court; he was asupporter of Brown v. Board, and favored sending troops to integrate
Little Rock High). Nixon saw he could develop a “Southern strategy”
based on Goldwater’s inroads. He did, but Independent Democrat George
Wallace carried most of the deep south in 68. By 1972, however, Wallace
was shot and paralyzed, and Nixon began to tilt the south to the GOP.
The old guard Democrats began to fade away while a new generation of
Southern politicians became Republicans. True, Strom Thurmond switched
to GOP, but most of the old timers (Fulbright, Gore, Wallace, Byrd etc
etc) retired as Dems.

Why did a new generation white Southerners join the GOP? Not because
they thought Republicans were racists who would return the South to
segregation, but because the GOP was a “local government, small
government” party in the old Jeffersonian tradition. Southerners wanted
less government and the GOP was their natural home.

Jimmy Carter, a Civil Rights Democrat, briefly returned some states
to the Democrat fold, but in 1980, Goldwater’s heir, Ronald Reagan,
sealed this deal for the GOP. The new “Solid South” was solid GOP.

BUT, and we must stress this: the new southern Republicans were
*integrationist* Republicans who accepted the Civil Rights revolution
and full integration while retaining their love of Jeffersonian limited
government principles.

And what did Malcolm X say about the “Dixiecrats”…?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkgA2rUAY-o&feature=player_embedded


http://www.black-and-right.com/the-democrat-race-lie/

http://www.black-and-right.com/2010/03/19/the-dixiecrat-myth/

So, there you have it. YOU are WRONG. YOU are UNEDUCATED. YOU refused to do RESEARCH. YOU look like a FOOL. Next time, try actually looking something up, instead of blatantly spewing lies and expecting people to believe you. BUT, if you need more clarification…I have that too, because I, unlike you, am not afraid to search for the truth.

REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS DID NOT SWITCH SIDES ON RACISM By Frances Rice

As a result of unrelenting efforts by Democrats to shift their racist past onto the backs of Republicans, using the mantra: “the parties switched sides”, a lot of people have requested an article addressing this issue.

It does not make sense to believe that racist Democrats suddenly rushed into the Republican Party, especially after Republicans spent nearly 150 years fighting for black civil rights. In fact, the racist Democrats declared they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than a Republican because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks.

From the time of its inception in 1854 as the anti-slavery party, the Republican Party has always been the party of freedom and equality for blacks. As author Michael Scheuer wrote, the Democratic Party is the party of the four S’s: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism. Democrats have been running black communities for the past 50+ years, and the socialist policies of the Democrats have turned those communities into economic and social wastelands.

An alarming view of what America will be like in a few years due to unbridled socialism being pushed by President Barack Obama and his Democratic Party cohorts, is contained in the article: “Detroit: The Moral of the Story” by Kevin D. Williamson that is posted on the Internet.

Democrats first used brutality and discriminatory laws to stop blacks from voting for Republicans. Democrats now use deception and government handouts to keep blacks from voting for Republicans. In his book, “Dreams From My Father,” Obama described what he and other Democrats do to poor blacks as “plantation politics.”

The racist Democrats of the 1950’s and 1960’s that Republicans were fighting died Democrats. One racist Democrat who survived until 2010 was US Senator Robert Byrd, a former recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan. Notably, the Ku Klux Klan was started by Democrats in 1866 and became the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party for the purpose of terrorizing and lynching Republicans—black and white. Byrd became a prominent leader in the Democrat-controlled Congress where he was honored by his fellow Democrats as the “conscience of the Senate.”

Byrd was a fierce opponent of desegregating the military and complained in one letter: “I would rather die a thousand times and see old glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again than see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen of the wilds.”

Democrats denounced US Senator Trent Lott for his remarks about US Senator Strom Thurmond. However, there was silence when Democrat US Senator Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been “a great senator for any moment.” Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and, after he became a Republican, Thurmond defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. While turning a blind eye to how the Democratic Party embraced Byrd until his death, Democrats regularly lambaste the Republican Party about David Duke, a former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.

Ignored are the facts that the Republican Party never embraced Duke and when he ran for the Republican Party presidential nomination in 1992, Republican Party officials tried to block his participation. Hypocritical is the word for how Democrats also ignore Duke’s long participation in the Democratic Party with no efforts by Democrats to block him. Below is Duke’s political history in Louisiana, which has an open primary system.

Duke ran for Louisiana State Senator as a Democrat in 1975. He ran again for the Louisiana State Senate in 1979 as a Democrat. In 1988, he made a bid for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination. Then, on election day in 1988, he had himself listed on the presidential ballot as an “Independent Populist.” After his unbroken string of losses as a Democrat and an Independent Populist, Duke decided to describe himself as a Republican, then ran the following races where he lost every time: in 1989 he ran for Louisiana State Representative; in 1990, he ran for US Senator; in 1991 he ran for Governor of Louisiana; in 1992 he ran for president; in 1996 he ran for US Senator; and in 1999 he ran for US Representative.

Contrary to popular belief, President Lyndon Johnson did not predict a racist exodus to the Republican Party from the Democratic Party because of Johnson’s support of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Omitted from the Democrats’ rewritten history is what Johnson actually meant by his prediction.

Johnson feared that the racist Democrats would again form a third party, such as the short-lived States Rights Democratic Party. In fact, Alabama’s Democrat Governor George C. Wallace in 1968 started the American Independent Party that attracted other racist candidates, including Democrat Governor Lester Maddox.

Behind closed doors, Johnson said: “These Negroes, they’re getting uppity these days. That’s a problem for us, since they got something now they never had before. The political pull to back up their upityness. Now, we’ve got to do something about this. We’ve got to give them a little something. Just enough to quiet them down, but not enough to make a difference. If we don’t move at all, their allies will line up against us. And there’ll be no way to stop them. It’ll be Reconstruction all over again.”

Little known by many today is the fact that it was Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Johnson, who pushed through the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In fact, Dirksen was instrumental to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964, 1965 and 1968. Dirksen wrote the language for the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing.

Democrats condemn Republican President Richard Nixon for his so-called “Southern Strategy.” These same Democrats expressed no concern when the racially segregated South voted solidly for Democrats for over 100 years, while deriding Republicans because of the thirty-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party.

The “Southern Strategy” that began in the 1970’s was an effort by Nixon to get fair-minded people in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were discriminating against blacks. Georgia did not switch until 2004, and Louisiana was controlled by Democrats until the election of Republican Bobby Jindal, a person of color, as governor in 2007.

As the co-architect of Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”, Pat Buchanan provided a first-hand account of the origin and intent of that strategy in a 2002 article posted on the Internet. Buchanan wrote that Nixon declared that the Republican Party would be built on a foundation of states’ rights, human rights, small government and a strong national defense. Nixon said he would leave it to the Democratic Party to squeeze the last ounce of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice.

The Claremont Institute published an eye-opening article by Gerard Alexander entitled “The Myth of the Racist Republicans”, an analysis of the decades-long shift of the South from the racist Democratic Party to the racially tolerant Republican Party. That article can be found on the Internet.

Another article on this subject by Mr. Alexander is entitled “Conservatism does not equal racism. So why do many liberals assume it does?” and is posted on the Internet.

More details about the history of civil rights can be found in the NBRA Civil Rights Newsletter that can be found on the Internet.
An excellent video about civil rights history entitled “A pebble in Your Shoe: Why I am a Republican” by Dr. James Taylor is posted on YouTube.


Frances Rice is a retired Army Lieutenant Colonel and Chairman of the National Black Republican Association. She may be contacted at: www.NBRA.in

KKK Terrorist Arm of the Democratic Party
By Frances Rice

History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the
Democrat Party. This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in
the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row
Publishers, Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renown liberal historian
who is the DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University.
As a further testament to his impeccable credentials, Professor Foner is
only the second person to serve as president of the three major
professional organizations: the Organization of American Historians,
American Historical Association, and Society of American Historians.
Democrats in the last century did not hide their connections to the Ku
Klux Klan. Georgia-born Democrat Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Grand Dragon
of the Ku Klux Klan wrote on page 21 of the September 1928 edition of
the Klan’s “The Kourier Magazine”: “I have never voted for any man who
was not a regular Democrat. My father … never voted for any man who was
not a Democrat. My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in
reconstruction days…. My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat….
My great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic
party.”

Dr. Foner in his book explores the history of the origins of Ku Klux
Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by
Democrats against Republicans, black and white.

On page 146 of his book, Professor Foner wrote: “Founded in 1866 as a
Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every
Southern state, launching a ‘reign of terror‘ against Republican leaders
black and white.” Page 184 of his book contains the definitive
statements: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the
interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who
desired the restoration of white supremacy. It aimed to destroy the
Republican party’s infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state,
reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial
subordination in every aspect of Southern life.”

Heartbreaking are Professor Foner’s recitations of the horrific acts of
terror inflicted by Democrats on black and white Republicans. Recounted
on pages 184-185 of his book is one such act of terror: “Jack Dupree, a
victim of a particularly brutal murder in Monroe County, Mississippi -
assailants cut his throat and disemboweled him, all within sight of his
wife, who had just given birth to twins - was ‘president of a republican
club‘ and known as a man who ‘would speak his mind.’”

“White gangs roamed New Orleans, intimidating blacks and breaking up
Republican meetings,“ wrote Dr. Foner on page 146 of his book. On page
186, he wrote: “An even more extensive ‘reign of terror’ engulfed
Jackson, a plantation county in Florida’s panhandle. ‘That is where
Satan has his seat,‘ remarked a black clergyman; all told over 150
persons were killed, among them black leaders and Jewish merchant Samuel
Fleischman, resented for his Republican views and for dealing fairly
with black customers.“

Frances Rice is the Chairman of the National Black Republican Association and may be contacted at: http://www.nbra.info/


Care to try again? I will be waiting for your response of hyperbole and rhetoric with no facts. I also doubt you lack the balls to post this info on your own wall, lest you look more like a fool. The golden part is, the notes will show my response and the TRUTH will once again be out there. This is what you call: game, set, match. Buh-bye!!

Mack Major #fundie edendecoded.com

Christians need to become more astute at determining the source of things.

For instance: when you hear a song from a favorite gospel artist or group, are you sure their source comes from God? Are they plugged into Holy Ghost power or demonic power?

Just because they can sing good or make you feel goosebumps doesn't mean God is their source. God may be the source of their gift: but is He the source for how that gift is being used?

Now I know some will say: 'But Mack, these gospel artists are singing gospel music (or Christian hip hop). Aren't they giving God the glory and leading others to Christ through their music?"

That depends again on the source. Is their music inspiring people to turn away from their sins, repent and turn to Christ? Is it influencing people to be more holy? If not, you must question the source.

•When you hear your favorite gospel song being played, what does it make you feel like doing? Does it inspire you to want to worship God with all your heart and soul: or are you just moved to dance and gyrate your hips?

•When you see your favorite gospel artist on stage performing or 'ministering,' are they dressed in a way that speaks holiness and godliness? Or do they awaken and excite feelings of lust, sensuality and worldliness?

I remember back in my club scene days, I'd be posted up near the bar whispering game in some woman's ear: when all of a sudden a Kirk Franklin song would come on. This isn't meant to bash Kirk or his music in any way. But I'm just keeping it real because this genuinely baffled me. When his music would come on, instead of people leaving the dance floor, they would keep right on dancing without skipping a beat.

No one would pause, stare in bewilderment or anything. This was amazing to me even while I was in a backslidden state myself, because this was a gospel song being sung by a well known gospel artist in a NIGHT CLUB! And yet no one felt any sense of conviction or need to change their ways.

The problem with the gospel music artists today is that many if not most are no longer plugging into God as their source. Their desire for worldly acceptance and demonic validation has blinded their hearts, and corrupted their gifts.

Again: don't get the gifting confused with the anointing. God gives people their ability or talent. That's the gifting. But the person can choose to plug that talent into God's power for His glory or purposes, or choose instead to plug it into a demonic source for the devil's glory or purposes.

What does the music inspire you to do? If it doesn't inspire you to be more holy, to feel a stronger internal desire to dig deeper into His Word and spend more time with our Heavenly Father, or encourage yourself or your brethren in Christ to hold on and keep the faith: then that source does NOT come from God; no matter how talented the artist might be.

A Godly source will inspire you to become more holy and godly. But a demonic source will encourage you to become more like those who are unsaved and of the world.

This is why you must steer yourself away from gospel artists who are inspiring you after the flesh. You know the type: the ones who go around proclaiming themselves to be 'sexy' Christians. or the ones who are quick to call everyone else judgmental because they don't agree with mixing the holy with the profane.

The only place a self-proclaimed sexy Christian can lead you to is right into sexual sin. God doesn't need his people using their bodies to attract others to Him! What type of demonic mess is that?!

Christ has called us to be holy vessels of God, and to present our bodies as a living sacrifice, crucifying our flesh daily so we can walk in holiness and sexual purity. You won't be able to do that if you're running around promoting your sexiness to others.

In fact, you've already been compromised by the devil if you find yourself feeling defensive as you read this article.

I challenge anyone to find me the verse and scripture where God told anyone to use their bodies or ungodly means to draw others to Jesus. You won't be able to, because that idea came direct from Hell. It wasn't inspired by the Holy Spirit: it was inspired by the spirit of Lust.

[...]

One last story and then I'm done: I remember going to church as a kid, and whenever someone got up to sing a solo, the elder church folk would say things like 'Let the Lord use you honey.' They said this because in their wisdom they knew the person could easily let a demon use them instead of being used by God. So they encouraged the soloist to channel the power of God for a powerful heavenly impact on the listeners.

It's time to purge your hearts and ears saints. This message won't be for everyone, because not everyone who calls himself or herself a believer truly is.

Jesus said "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven." - Matthew 7:21

This message is for those who truly desire to walk upright and live in such a manner that truly pleases our Heavenly Father.

If you have a strong addiction to listening to demonically inspired music...and remember our test from earlier...it's time to purge your musical playlist. This is an important step in walking upright before God.

We're about to enter a phase in our world where darkness and sin will sweep this earth like never before.

God is allowing sin and demonic influence to increase because the time is near for Him to return and bring an end to Satan's reign of terror.

He's separating His sheep from Satan's goats. And all those who are still tinkering and tampering with sin will find it more difficult than ever to pull away. The sin you hold onto is the one that destroys you. So don't be destroyed by sin: cast it out!

Go through your musical tastes and playlist. And do this prayerfully with all the honesty you can muster. As you honestly assess each artist you enjoy listening to and their music, ask yourself some simple questions:

What does this music inspire me to do? Am I influenced by this artist and their music to read my bible more, pray more, go to church more, abstain from sexual sin and my own fleshly desire for worldly and sensual validation?

Be totally honest and transparent. Pray and ask God by His spirit to help you remove any and all influence from your life that does not match what His ideal for you is! He'll help you if you sincerely want His help.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesus-is-savior.com

Romans 13:1 in the King James Bible (KJB) teaches to submit to the “higher powers,” not the “governing authorities” as the New International Version (NIV) perversion says. The U.S. Constitution and our Bill of Rights (the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution) are a higher power than the U.S. federal government. And for that matter, God is the highest power (Ecclesiastes 5:8). The federal government has already recruited 26,000 pastors to join Clergy Response Teams to quell any national uprising. Do you know why? It's because a Police State is rising up around us, and our economy is going to implode!

Let me ask you a question: How do 2 planes bring down 3 buildings? It's impossible! WTC Building # 7 imploded and fell to the ground in 6.5 seconds. No fire caused that! In fact, the lying newsmedia reported that the building had fallen 20-minutes before it even fell. I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried.

Most of the evidence is solid concrete; not mere circumstantial evidence. Look at the facts. Architects and structural engineers from around the world have stated that it is impossible for two skyscrapers to simply crumble to the ground from a plane crash and fire. Think about it. Has any fire ever caused a skyscraper to lean or crumble even a little bit?

Furthermore, www.wtc7.net shows actual news footage of Trade Tower Building # 7 (WTC 7) imploding to the ground as well on the afternoon of 911. No plane ever struck WTC 7!!! The building was blown to the ground with explosives according to the owner of the building. Why was this building destroyed?

The investigations into 911 have been blocked repeatedly by the office of the President and top leaders working under him. The Bin Laden family has strong business ties with the Bush family spanning back decades. Firefighters at the scene on 911 have signed sworn affidavits that they heard multiple explosions going off at the time the buildings started to fall. Top Pentagon officials and leaders were warned the day before not to fly on 911. Israeli and French intelligence sources had warned the U.S. government prior to 911 that an attack would occur, but no one listened.

Many families and friends of the victims on 911 believe the government masterminded and carried out 911, some loved ones have even sued the president and his administration. Other victim's families have been paid generously to remain silent.

Folks, there is A LOT to all this. I haven't even got to the drugs in Afghanistan. Our troops are being exploited as paid heroine (opium) farmers. The Russian government has appealed to NATO for destruction of the opium crops in Afghanistan, because of the massive heroine-addict problems in Russia today. NATO refused. Afghanistan produces 90% of the world's heroine supply.

You really need to learn about all these different things before you can start to form a big picture of what is really going on. The U.S. had troops already situated on the Afghan border before 911 even happened. Our military was already in place and ready to invade Afghanistan. Afghanistan produces a half-trillion dollars (heroine value) of opium every year. While children are starving of malnutrition in Afghanistan today, the U.S. government protects hundreds-of-billions of dollars in heroin producing opium. Like everything else, follow the money. It's so wicked in the sight of God.

Thinker #fundie mobile.nytimes.com

The economic rationale behind the Asian cap is donor money. It is likely that Harvard receives most of its donations from wealthy White individuals. If the school became seen as "too Asian" these donors would stop giving. Why give money to an institution they see as not benefiting "their" kind?

If there was no cap at the Ivy League schools, America's elite could become predominantly Asian American within a few generations. This sudden demographic change would receive major backlash and resentment from the White majority. The United States, whether you like it or not, is still a White, Western country that primarily serves this group's interests. No group relishes in seeing themselves become a minority in their own country.

Suppose the top universities in China became overwhelmingly White. Do you not think there would be backlash and attempts to limit their numbers as well? Of course there would.

Gandhi's Fist #conspiracy breitbart.tv

Wow--where to start, where to start...?

First, the arguement. Climate change is inherent on this planet. Proof? 10,000 years ago, the entire planet was in the throws of a global ice age. Without the assistance of man, that ice--which was over 1 mile in depth over NYC--melted. All this without the assistance of man or observations by Al Gore. As it turns out, both the planets Mars and Saturn have experienced global warming at exactly the same time we did. How do we know this? NASA was good enough to provide global orbiters which amongst many beautiful photos, provided extraordinarily accurate temperature readings. Now, I'm no Bill Nye, but what could be the cause of global warming/cooling on a solar system wide scale. Hummm? Could it be...the sun? Add to this that Global warming/climate change "scientists" have been manipulating numbers to inflict odious taxes on the population (by the way--there is your motive) and there you have it; the world's greatest fraud.

No one, not a single person I know of either political stripe likes pollution and waste, but this eco-con artistry is more than that. It is not based on science, but statist political ambition, funded by carbon tax. Tax just for breathing.

Bill Nye is the second aguement that could be made here. Nye gets some funding by--wait for it--the public trough. That's right, he gets money from the government. The government wants money from us. Does anyone see--at the very least--a conflict of interest. Further, while Bill Nye is has training--primarily as an engineer, he is no atmospheric scientist. So basically, this interview would be like getting a botanist to discuss open heart surgery in humans. He isn't qualified. Just like Al Gore isn't qualified. A polical science major does not an atmospheric scientist make.

The facts of our climate are quite the opposite of the picture painted by the global warm--no, wait--climate change con artists. The earth has been cooling, globally since 1998. While there are pockets of hot weather, the trend is definitely towards colder temps. It does not take a savant like Gore, to figure out that something has to cool the atmosphere in order for it to snow at all. You folks have any idea what that "something" might be? My money is on the sun. Which brings us to the study of that blazing hot orb. The study of the sun (also compliments of NASA), have revealed a marked reduction in sunspots, a year's absence in fact. To those not knowledgeable about the study of the Heliosphere, this roughly translated means the sun is cooling a little. This year we've also posted record low temperatures, planet wide.

Al may have made a nice fictional movie, publicly funded scientists want to see us taxed and the left wing media like Madow might want us to support this agenda using pseudo scientific arguments, but now that we see what they're up to we're saying, "NO!". On a personal level, I'm also saying, "Al--eat my shorts."

Mother Tynnetta Muhammad #fundie #crackpot #racist finalcall.com

The history of the White race or European nations on our planet has been one of incessant warfare, mischief making, violence and bloodshed from their inception. The true history of the White race has been taught to us for the first time upon the coming of the mysterious man or god-scientist in the early 1930s named Master Fard Muhammad. This history of the White man’s rule for the last 6,000 years has been kept as a secret by a small circle of scientists who write our history throughout the cycles of time. This knowledge brought to us by this Great Master breaks up the circle of the Twelve Scientists who write this prophetic timeline thus bringing this world to an end.

The Honorable Elijah Muhammad was chosen by The Master to transmit this knowledge to the Original Nation and peoples of the planet earth. This Secret Knowledge also brings an end to the mystery of God. This is why the Divine Teachings of the Honorable Elijah Muhammad are so profound and complex at the same time because it was necessary to wait until the end of their time to rule before new knowledge could be revealed. The 18th Surah of the Holy Qur’an also reveals the history of the White race and European nation very clearly, but one has to connect the prophecies to the chronology of world events concerning this people and their rule on our planet. Only through a careful study and analysis of history can one understand the value of the Divine Teachings of the Honorable Elijah Muhammad. We must be able to “cross the T’s and dot the I’s,” and place right punctuation marks that will enable us to see more clearly.

By asking further questions on this subject as they appear in our nation’s sacred writings of Supreme Wisdom Lessons given to all students who are registered in the Nation of Islam, giving us a comprehensive knowledge of the origin of all races and how they came to be, it is the antecdote to this world’s illusion and state of insomnia. This methodology of teaching brings people back to life and universal consciousness as we are being resurrected and mentally alive again. We continue with the questions that are stated in this particular lesson as following: “What is the meaning of ‘Eu’ and rope? How long ago? What did the devil bring with him? What kind of life did he live? And how long before Mossa came to teach the devil of the forgotten tricknollegy?” This was a series of 6 interwoven questions asked by The Master, questioning His disciple and student, the Honorable Elijah Muhammad, in his First Term Examination in preparation for his mission in the Resurrection of his mentally dead people. Historically, this took place prior to The Master’s departure in 1934. I wish for our readers to understand, to the best of our ability, the context out of which we are sharing this information to the general public in a time of great global crisis.

The Honorable Elijah Muhammad was chosen to take the lead in this transmission of knowledge to awaken the sleeping dead and the blind, deaf and dumb condition of our people who have been captured in slavery, struck with a blow to the head and murdered and set on a westerly course and buried in the Northeast corner of the temple that he built. But the architect was put to sleep for over four hundred years and God Himself had to find a way to awaken His dead people. Many of the answers to the above questions are also hidden in the symbolic language of Masonry which we will explore in future articles on this subject (God willing). The unveiling of Yakub’s history and the origin of the White race, which includes the origin of all races on our planet, must be revealed at this time of the end of the present world order of Satan.

gladiator_f1.jpg
Film still from the movie Gladiator.

Where did the White race go immediately after leaving the island of Pilan or Patmos after they were conceived or manufactured from the germ of the Black man? What is our duty and responsibility as a civilized man of a New World Order to all others who have not been given this knowledge? Can the potter say to the clay that they are dissolved of responsibility in what they have fashioned? Does not the clay that has been fashioned by the potter have a right to question the maker on what he has made? Justice must be applied here in the answer. This is precisely why The Great Mahdi, Master Fard Muhammad appeared in America at the turn of the 20th century to settle the question and give us the answers both to the made man and the maker, the original people and judge both Black and White. He came to set justice in the earth and to do justice by both peoples to establish a Kingdom of God on earth in which we can all live in peace.

Rick Moser #fundie returnofkings.com

Most people don’t consider how architecture is important to relationships. Good architecture helps you meet and get to know people. But what few people realize is that the stores, office buildings, and houses they live in are often designed to stop this from happening.

Why would architects want to design unhappy buildings? To push an agenda. The preachers of social justice have realized architecture’s significance and used it to subtly change our behavior, our values, and beliefs. They want to change how we interact, and that includes isolating people and destroying their relationships.

...

Ancient languages were infused with gender. Early people saw gender differences in everything around them. Gender became weaker and less important over time, until progressives erased gender completely. Today’s gender-neutral language inculcates a false belief that male and female are equal.

Sexes were distinct in architecture as well. The Greek Doric order, with its robust and austere proportions represented the man. The slim and decorative Ionic order represented the female. Designers emulated the inherent human roles they saw in the natural world.

But modern progressives decided that a person’s sex is just a construct of conditioning. They decided women are less useful to the economy as stay-at-home mothers and more productive in the workforce and as prodigious consumers. To change human roles they changed environmental expectations.

Just as modernists erased gender from language, they removed it from our buildings and made purely functional structure that did not speak to the sexes. Distinction is rarely made that correlates to the sexes: sturdy vs. slim, bare vs. adorned, dominant vs. subservient, geometric vs. whimsical.

...

Today’s architecture pushes unnatural expectations. The Women’s Restroom Bill of 1987 mandated that men’s and women’s bathrooms be exactly the same, except what is necessary for biological differences. Before this, men’s bathrooms were communal and accommodated more people. Women’s restrooms placed toilets behind a lockable doors and had extra spaces for childcare, grooming, and resting.

...

Sex roles ought to be the norm, and exceptions can be accommodated in a separate space. Early European settlers in Australia wiped out the aboriginal jilmi which accommodated a single woman’s special needs. They thought it was “prison-like” to isolate single women away from everyone else. But it turned out this was important for social cohesion. Similarly, the Law of Moses set certain standards for women in the community. The community in those days did not bow down to their needs, but rather made a separate space to accommodate them.

Ancient Egyptian, Roman, and Oriental houses had separate areas for women and men. Englishman Robert Kerr outlined gender-specific organizations and functions for each room of a house. Emphasis was placed on the man as the leader of the household. The radial paths of garden paths at the Duke of Beaufort’s residence all converged on his dining chair. (see Gender Studies in Architecture…, Dorte Routledge, p. 135) Architecture reinforced healthy expectations of human interactions.

Today’s house assigns no hierarchy of gender to its rooms, which means women take over the entire house. By designing from a female frame, less emphasis is made on the diversity of the household, its hierarchy, or of the diversity and hierarchy of the community. If the man is lucky, he can have the garage for his “man-cave.” But along with the house, public and work spaces are overtaken and forced to serve the woman’s needs.

Early Irish natives were nomadic tribes who repeatedly dismantled and rebuilt their dwellings. Over time, construction of their tents became a ritual that symbolized the marriage of the owners. Then, as today, the dwellings were constructed by men and the interior furnished by women. This distinction made the tent ritualistically “a site of creation, separation, autonomy and mobility.” (Vernacuular Architecture in the 21st Century, Lindsay Asquith, p. 80) Both men and women had a role in architecture, but in proper and distinguished ways. Today, how many men are in control of the house they live in?

Such consideration must be made in today’s architecture. The public needs to recognize the gender manipulation and oppressive expectations pushed on them by their environment. Today’s push against traditional gendered architecture isolates men. Public spaces do not help men and women meet each other, because they suit the woman’s need to “feel safe.” Private spaces do not foster a harmonious family relationship because they manipulate the natural family hierarchy.

The presence of gender in architecture helps couples meet each other in public places and live happily in domestic places. Its removal and manipulation is pushing men and women apart.

Ricardo Duchesne #fundie eurocanadian.ca

We should not be satisfied. In my books The Uniqueness of Western Civilization and Faustian Man in a Multicultural Age I emphasized the "continuous creativity" of Europeans from ancient Greek times to the present. I also went back to the revolutionary contributions of pre-historic Europeans in the domestication and riding of horses, their co-invention of wheeled vehicles, their principal contribution to the "secondary-products revolution," their invention of chariots, their creation of the most dynamic language in history, the proto-Indo-European language, their nurturing of the only true aristocratic culture in history (in which rulers were not despots but first among equals), their origination of the first heroic and tragic literature, and, most important of all, their responsibility for the appearance of "self-consciousness" in history, which laid the foundations for the Greek Miracle.

I highlighted the scholars who wrote about the Greek invention of secular observation of nature, the invention of mathematical proof, the invention of artistic realism, the invention of prose writing, the invention of historical writing, the invention of politics, the invention of infantry warfare, the production of the highest sequence of the greatest thinkers in history, the Hellenistic Revolution in Science, not to mention technological and economic novelties.

I also mentioned the Roman contribution of the first rationalized legal system that recognized each citizen as a legal person, Rome's unsurpassed engineering, aqueducts, Latin literature, and rational infrastructure of war-making as well as the greatest empire in human history. I argued that the Middle Ages were one of the most creative periods in history as evidenced by the invention of universities, corporate autonomy of the church and towns coupled with the "first modern legal system," the invention of mechanical clocks, the scholastic method of investigation, the best water mills, Romanesque and Gothic architectural buildings unsurpassed in history, the three field system of agriculture, an entire Renaissance in the 12th century.

The West is filled with "origins," "transitions," "inventions," "renaissances," "discoveries," and "revolutions": the Printing Revolution, the Portuguese rounding of Africa, the discovery of the New World, Cartographic Revolution, the Italian Renaissance, the invention of perspective painting, the Copernican Revolution, the Newtonian Revolution, the Military Revolution, the Glorious Revolution, the French Revolution, the First Industrial Revolution, the Second Industrial Revolution, the German Philosophical Revolution(s) from Leibniz to Kant to Hegel to Nietzsche to Heidegger, the invention of the Novel, the Romantic Rebellion, the Darwinian Revolution — to mention a few.

Meanwhile, the Rest of the world remained stuck without any major novelties after the inventions of the Bronze Age that we associate with the rise of civilization as such. There was change, but no revolutionary novelties, no major thinkers, no major scientists, no major artists. There were a few philosophical reflections by Muslims out of their reading of Aristotle early in the Middle Ages, and some novelties in pharmaceutical ingredients and optics. The Chinese also produced a few trinkets by way of water clocks, firecrackers, and paper. But Chinese "development" consisted only in demographic expansion, intensification of rice farming, and the building of big ships called "junks."

Western Accomplishments Are Exponentially Greater

The immense and continuous breakthrough of Europeans in all fields of human endeavour can only be properly captured when we zero in on particular philosophers, painters, novelists, mathematicians, logicians, musical composers. Even the startling lists that Charles Murray produced showing, for example, that the giants for each of the natural sciences (the top twenty in astronomy, physics, biology, medicine, chemistry, earth sciences, and mathematics) consisted of Europeans with the exception of one Japanese, do not capture adequately the originality of European greatness. His statistical calculation that 97 percent of accomplishment in the sciences occurred in Europe and North America from 800 BC to 1950 is obviously revealing.

So is his observation that the sheer number of "significant figures" in literature in the West is 835, whereas in India, the Arab World, China, and Japan combined the number is only 293. The same is true of his observation that the West produced 479 major figures in the visual arts as compared to 192 for China and Japan combined (with no significant figures listed for India and the Arab World). And the observation that the West produced all the great figures of classical music.

It is also very revealing that, according to my estimations, 95 percent, and most likely 98 percent, of the great explorers in history were European.

Still, these numbers don't capture the qualitative originality of European greatness. Measuring European greatness has always entailed an evaluation of the way artists, novelists, philosophers, composers, mathematicians have occasioned a breakthrough, a new way of explaining history, a new style of poetic expression, a whole new philosophical outlook. In contrast, the measurement of non-European greatness tends to be about men who were good at following an existing tradition, perfecting an existing style of painting and poetic expression, reinforcing the unquestioned thoughts of sages.

The standards for Western greatness are far higher. Here is a glimpse of European greatness in classical music. We learn that in Claudio Monteverdi (1567-1643), pioneer of opera, "for the first time in history there was a complete unity between drama and music." We learn that "it is harmonic intensity above all that sets Bach's music apart from that of his contemporaries...In Bach's music a completely new harmonic language is forged [...] There is no music in the literature that has Bach's kind of rightness, of inevitability, of intelligence, of logically organized sequence of notes."

When Haydn started, "the new music — the music of the style galant — was in its infancy and Haydn put everything together. It is not for nothing that he is called the Father of the Symphony. With equal Justice he can be called the father of the String Quartet...Rococo is left far behind; this is Classicism of the purest kind, and the music is big." Beethoven, "from the beginning he was a creator, one of those natural talents, full of ideas and originality [...] Then came Eroica, and music was never again the same. With one convulsive wrench, music entered the nineteenth century."

Berlioz "was a natural revolutionary, the first of the conscious avant-gardists...Uninhibited, highly emotional, witty, mercurial, picturesque, he was very conscious of his Romanticism [...] he was in every way a revolutionary, fully prepared to throw established and even sacred notions into a garbage can." Chopin "was not only a genius as a pianist, he was creatively a genius, one of the most startlingly original ones of the century [...] For the first time the piano became a total instrument: a singing instrument, an instrument of infinite colour, poetry, and nuance, a heroic instrument, an intimate instrument." [The above citations are from The Lives of the Great Composers, 2006].

This kind of originality can be found in all the arts and sciences of the West. Actually, the entire history of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, historical writing, logic, archaeology, anthropology, sociology, economics, geography, is dominated by Europeans from beginning to end. After all, these disciplinary fields were all invented by Europeans.

Why this is so should be the mother of all historical questions. Yet even the thought that Europe was slightly greater terrifies an academic world obligated to push a multicultural mandate in education. This explains the hysteria against King. Talking about European greatness is now identified as "mentally stunted."

The only unique contribution Europeans are allowed, known as the "great divergence," is the Industrial Revolution, with perhaps permission to connect this revolution to the rise of modern science. But students are quickly reminded that China is now surpassing the West in industrial development. Jack Goldstone and Kenneth Pomeranz are two prominent names behind this historical revisionism. They say the West was merely different in reaching an industrial state first thanks to the exploitation of the Americas, the availability of coal in England, or the "fortuitous" development of an instrumentalist-engineering science in the 1700s. A few critics are begging for the inclusion of Western liberal institutions in the assessment of this divergence. But all in all, the uniqueness of the West is now suppressed.

Robert Smith #racist amren.com

How a Young Black Man Became a Race Realist

I am a 21-year-old black man. I am an atheist, a registered Republican, and a member of Mensa. Already a minority within a minority within a minority, I have yet another idiosyncrasy that puts me in an even more unusual category: I am a race realist. I believe that consistently observed racial disparities in societal outcomes are largely rooted in genetic differences, primarily differences in average levels of intelligence.

High school

This was the first time race predominated in the social climate. I started to notice people self-segregating along racial lines. But most confusingly, black students who did not conform to stereotypes were considered “Oreos:” black on the outside, but white on the inside. I remember the following comments:

“You’re so quiet. Do you consider yourself black?” This from a white classmate, genuinely confused as to why I bucked the general black trend of rambunctious and loud behavior.

A white classmate says something racially offensive in my presence and another asks, “Why would you say that with a black person standing by us?” Answer: “It’s fine; he’s white at heart!”

An Asian classmate: “You’re an embarrassment to your race.”

A group of black students are listing black classmates whom they think act white, and include me: “Yes, he’s white on the inside. He has no accent and hangs out with too many white boys.” (The person who said that flunked out at the end of the school year. He enrolled in a predominately black high school and went to an HBCU. Two months ago, as of this writing, he was killed in a black-on-black crime. There were no protests or riots carried for him, since his death could not be made to look like black victimhood. He got nothing but a few people on Facebook posting his obituary. Maybe he should have acted more “white.”)

I not only saw blacks accuse other blacks of “acting white,” but, even more often, I saw whites accuse their black friends of “acting white.” My Asian friend — of whom I was quite fond — would often say that he didn’t consider me black. I found this extremely puzzling. To me, “acting white” meant being an Uncle Tom — someone who is intentionally betraying his race and cares more about the approval of whites than of other blacks. Being called an “Uncle Tom” is definitely not a compliment. In fact, it is one of the harshest insults for a black person.

The self-hating black person is derided in black culture, as in Uncle Ruckus from The Boondocks and Clayton Bigsby from the Dave Chappelle Show. Many blacks would rather associate with a murderer than with an Uncle Tom. This is not mere hyperbole. The black community eagerly embraces thugs and criminals who destroy their neighborhoods while it ostracizes its most principled members — educated and conservative blacks.

Even more confusing, I noticed that the more intelligent blacks would be particularly prone to accusations of “acting white.” All my life I had believed that trying to come across as an intelligent and civilized person, working hard, speaking standard English, assimilating into American society, not playing the race card, and not acting like a minstrel show character were characteristics of intelligence — not traits associated with any particular race. That ghetto blacks would accuse others of “acting white” I could, to some degree, understand. After all, the more academically oriented blacks did tend to associate more readily with white people than with other blacks, who tended to be ignorant. But what was truly mind-boggling to me was how whites and Asians could accuse blacks — even their own friends — of “acting white.” Why did they mock their black friends for doing what they were supposed to do? Why were intelligent and civilized blacks so often called race traitors by both blacks and whites?

Like an idiot, I succumbed to this pressure. I came to view hard work and academic success as “white” activities. I began to take school and life less seriously, approaching it with a half-hearted attitude, as if giving it my all would be “white,” and antithetical to the very core of my identity. I tried to the greatest extent possible to distance myself from my white classmates — not a good idea at a school that is 90 percent white.

I ended up graduating nowhere near the top of my class but still got into an elite college due to affirmative action and good test scores. I felt a bit guilty for gaming the system, but I felt I experienced discrimination — because of the “acting white” comments — and affirmative action was my way of getting back at an unfair system. (The same college also gave offers of admission to two other blacks from my high school. Their level of achievement was, obviously, high by black standards but also nowhere near the level that would have been required of a white or Asian.)

College

In college it soon became clear that I was woefully mismatched. I began to doubt whether I was smart enough to work at such an elite level. Perhaps the problem was me, not society.

Other black students were constantly on the watch for imaginary racism. They felt so self-entitled they drew up a document intended to force the school to accept more students and hire more professors from underrepresented races.

I doubted my abilities to such a great degree that I decided to get my IQ tested. My FSIQ (full scale IQ) was 141 — 99.7th percentile!

image

I have included my hand in the photo to confirm that I am black.

Acting white

For years I was convinced that the major cause of black social pathology was this “acting white” accusation and the phenomenon of having to “prove” one’s blackness. It had certainly had a great effect on my life and impacted other high-IQ blacks around me. However, one day I came across a brilliant article by Steve Sailer addressing this topic.

He made the incisive point that doing well in school would not be considered “acting white” if blacks and whites had the same average IQ. That was my turning point. I realized that this was not a discrimination issue at all or even evidence of racial bias. What my white and Asian classmates meant when they accused blacks of “acting white” was not to call them “Uncle Tom” or “race traitor,” but something more along the lines of “you act more like a stereotypical white person than a stereotypical black person.” Factor in the differing average IQs, and it’s no wonder why the more intelligent blacks are often accused of “acting white.”

Of course high-IQ blacks will tend to associate more with a group that has an average IQ of 100 than a group with an average IQ of 85. This “acting white” phenomenon is exactly what one would expect when groups differing as significantly in intelligence as do black and whites co-exist: Behavior that is associated with intelligence becomes associated with whiteness.

I am now amused by how difficult it is to separate behavior that is stereotypically black from behavior that is generally associated with low IQ: making poor life decisions, failing in school, getting in trouble with the law, being loud and obnoxious, speaking poorly, promoting destructive and ignorant behavior, etc. Conversely, it is difficult to distinguish behavior that is “white” from behavior that reflects high IQ: being polite and civilized, showing emotional restraint, working hard, speaking articulately, being educated, being goal-oriented, listening to classical music, etc. It’s as though everyone subconsciously picks up on the IQ differences even if they don’t explicitly realize that what they’re noticing is different levels of intelligence.

I continued to study the question. I found that that other black members of Mensa are commonly told they are “acting white.” This pattern holds true throughout the world. High-achieving blacks in Britain hear the same thing. Successful Brazilian blacks are called the complimentary term “black with a white soul.”

I learned that literally everywhere in the world where blacks are found in large numbers, they exhibit lower rates of educational success and higher rates of criminality than other races. It’s no mystery why blacks who buck these trends are seen as different from other blacks.

I got my own DNA tested. I found out that I am 25 percent European — which is to be expected among American blacks. More interestingly, I learned that I was in the 96th percentile for Neanderthal ancestry among African-Americans. I find it amusing that I’ve so often had my blackness questioned; I’m unusually high in genetic material that is completely absent from pure Africans.

Compelling quotations

Here are a few observations by blacks that have stuck in my mind.

“Most of the people who were popular in my high school are either dead or in jail.” — my aunt

“This area was so nice when white people lived here.” — my grandmother, driving through a black ghetto

“I have been called ‘white’ my entire life. It’s a shame that just because I didn’t get high, skip class, and steal from the corner store I was thought of as a lame individual.” — a female cousin

“It’s not too often we get a young brother like you here. You’re proper. Most of the young black men I know besides you are thugs.” — a middle-aged black man I met during a summer internship

“N*ggers are terrible.” — my father, who often comes into contact with ghetto blacks in his line of work

“If it’s stupid, they like it.” — my grandmother, referring to young black people

“Why do we always have to come up with dumb shit?” — my extremely militant and pro-black uncle, lamenting black people’s proclivity for ignorance

It’s IQ, not racism

I now have no doubt about race realism. All the lines of evidence, from history to life experience, point to the same conclusion. All the usual excuses for black dysfunction are epiphenomenal and stem from the basic fact of lower average black IQ. Others viewed us as inferior because we never developed the wheel, a written language, a calendar, a mechanical device, or a two-story building. Slavery happened because whites (and Arabs before them) were able to enslave blacks; they had better technology and capitalized on the lack of black cohesion. Historians estimate that 90 percent of the slaves shipped to the New World were first enslaved by other Africans. (This is also consistent with Phil Rushton’s application of r/K theory; Africans have always shown low in-group preference.) All the usual explanations for black failure melt away once the fact of lower IQ is acknowledged. Anti-intellectual culture, poverty, bad schools, single-parent families, lack of role models, you name it — they are exactly what you would expect in a population with a lower average level of intelligence.

I certainly have learned much more about how the world actually works from great men like Phil Rushton, Richard Lynn, Steve Sailer, and Jared Taylor than I have ever learned from hucksters like Ta-Nehisi Coates, Jesse Jackson, or Al Sharpton. One might find race realism to be a depressing worldview; of course no one wants to believe that his race is much less intelligent on average than other races. But I truly believe that if you evaluate the evidence from an unbiased perspective and use logic rather than emotion, you cannot come to any other conclusion.

Furthermore, a worldview that takes into account human biodiversity is certainly more realistic and even hopeful than eternally yearning for whites suddenly to “wake up to racism” or voluntarily renounce their thirst for destroying “black bodies” — something Ta-Nehisi Coates thinks comes naturally to them. It is more hopeful than waiting for blacks around the world to stop creating “cultures of incompetence,” for which they seem to have quite a knack. It is more hopeful than waiting 250 years for the achievement gap to close or 228 years for the black-white wealth gap to close.

I now know what would theoretically be needed to close these gaps: a higher black IQ. I am free of any resentment against whites, for no matter how bad slavery, Jim Crow, or any other misdeed that whites are frequently made to feel guilty for, blacks around the world are infinitely better off than they would have been if whites had simply left them alone to live in mud huts and tote spears in Africa.

I feel empowered, for I now know that there is no impenetrable wall of white racism holding me back. In the words of the founder of logic, Aristotle, “The high-minded man must care more for the truth than for what people think.” If admitting the truth makes me an “Uncle Tom,” so be it.

As for my uncle’s question, “Why do we always have to come up with dumb shit?”, applying Occam’s razor will yield an elegant and parsimonious answer.

andy48 #fundie nairaland.com

Hi Gaybo, "you clearly said you are not gay" doesn't mean you are telling the truth. Studies has shown that Criminals like you don't ever admit they are criminals until they are cut red handed. Insecurities over men like you faking their fellow men? Nahhh You are obviously confused. People like you will defend sleeping with their blood sisters because it now happen in the western world. You have been defending the gay act and insulting your father land for not accepting gays because the USA now accept it. I also lectured you on why we are not obligated to imitate the western world on everything and you became angry. If you continue with steady anal sex you will need Diapals like the Pics I sent you above and you can't go to the hospital to complain because na the nurse go stab you by herself. Can't imagine a Grown up man like you will take off his boxers for a fellow man to Fck him. Tufiakwa. If you can't change then remain in your closet because if you are caught men go beat you die oh. I warn you again Gaybo.

AlexxTheGreat #racist telegraph.co.uk

I have to add:..Eurpeans were never decended from Africans...OR, if they were, the intelligent ones stayed on the European continent, became farmer, scientists, artists, builders, politicians...They built roads, farms and houses....museums and arena's of all kinds.Are you telling me that the ones who stayed in Africa were the dumb ones...the ones who still crap in holes in the ground.THOSE...the ones that came here on slave boats...They stayed and waited to be traded as human flesh.
Europeans are, in no way, related to anything on the African continent.....that is a stretch of wild imagining, son.

TrueNameAmended #conspiracy #racist reddit.com

If you’re ignoring the JQ, you’re wasting your time and might as well quit conspiracy research altogether.

Be forewarned, this will be lengthy.

Let me preface this by saying, if your gut reaction to someone bringing up the JQ is to screech “anti-Semite! Nazi!” then you are as brainwashed as the average MSM-watching average Joe who honestly believes Muslim highjackers brought down the World Trade Center. Literally no important distinction to be made in terms of critical thinking skills. You just have more diverse interests.

Acknowledging the JQ and its role in the events of the past, present and future, and its critical importance to almost all the conspiracy topics people have examined, does not make one a racist, anti-Semite, Notzee or any other buzzword created by the establishment to silence truth-tellers. Being a “Jew-hater” is absolutely not a prerequisite for honest examination of the JQ. Though, admittedly, the more information you absorb pertaining to the JQ, the easier it becomes to start thinking like those awful NOTZEES.

With that out of the way... The history of destructive Jewish behavior and contempt for non-Jews goes all the way back to before the time of Jesus Christ. The annals of (unsanitized) history are so full of examples of Jewish destruction that there is probably no single other subject that features so prominently. This is not a conspiracy, it’s fact. Jews have been expelled from over 100 countries throughout history. It’s safe to say, if you keep moving to a new neighborhood, and every time you do you’re thrown out, at some point you can’t blame your neighbors anymore. Their patterns of behavior and activities have forever remained unchanged, and everywhere they went, they wreaked havoc on the native population.

Also not a conspiracy, is the disproportionate presence Jews have in all the important sectors of western societies. Banking, media, academia, education, big pharma, publishing, federal agencies, the judiciary, big tech/Silicon Valley, and on and on and on. That a group comprising 2% of the American population wields the levers of power and influence to such an extent that they make decisions and exert influence over nearly all our country’s affairs almost exclusively, should in itself be off-putting to anyone with a highly-functioning brain. Again, this is not conspiracy theory, it is an easily verifiable fact.

Having established this fact, it stands to reason that most, if not all, of the conspiracies we study and discuss have behind them Jewish power players and Jewish influence. It also stands to reason that these actors behind the scenes driving these conspiracies are not acting on behalf of others, or towards the best interests of people or groups whose role in the major goings-on in our society and world are lesser than their own.

The next thing you must ask yourself is, what historical patterns are these people known for, and what are they working towards? What types of societal characteristics benefit them and reflect those patterns seen throughout history in other nations where they assumed powerful and influential roles? Who stands to gain from this conspiracy or that conspiracy, and in what way? And do those groups who stand to gain have a peculiarly ethnic profile? Go down the list of some of the major, future-altering conspiracies of the last, say, half century or so. Did the aftermath of those events produce favorable conditions or outcomes predominantly for one group of people? Name names, and the answer becomes clear.

When you take an honest look at the current state of affairs in the US and Europe, and you examine historical patterns, along with the groups and individuals spearheading these societal shifts, conspiracy theory becomes common sense. When you examine the former Weimar Republic, for example, and compare it with the transformation our western societies have undergone, they are shockingly similar. And the group driving those transformations is the same.

What one must understand about the Jews is, 99% of the time, their interests are antithetical to those of the host nation and population at large. At best, they consider themselves as “the other,” or perpetual outsiders, which influences their desire to disrupt homogeneous societies. It’s how they believe they protect themselves. At worst, however, consider their attitude towards Gentiles broadly, and white European Gentiles more specifically. Again, as a matter of historical fact, and their own words, values, cultural traditions, and most glaringly their “religious” doctrine (which, by the way, even non-religious Jews base their entire value system on). This is not conspiracy theory, though it can be said that not every Jew on Earth operates this way. Nevertheless, the cohesive group-mentality dictates every part of the Jew’s life, even those who do not consider themselves devout in this regard. They are all spiritually connected regardless of how strong their religious or cultural ties to the group are. All of this is a matter of historical record.

When you hear all the usual culprits thrown around in conspiracy circles — Illuminati, Freemasons, globalists, Bilderbergs, deep state, the corporations, etc — they’re used as nothing more than empty buzzwords to skirt the task of naming names and taking an honest look at the real issues. All these entities consist of, or are proxies for, Jews and Jewish interests. With adequate research, the Jewish connections to these groups is undeniable.

The French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution, the failed revolution in Germany around the same time, the Holodomor famine in Ukraine, World War I, World War II, the Vietnam War, the various conflicts in the Middle East during the decades after Israel was established, the Iraq war, the war in Afghanistan, the complete annihilation of Libya, the attack on the USS Liberty, 9/11, and almost every other major conflict in modern history was instigated by, fought for, or benefited almost exclusively Jews and/or Israel.

If you can come up with a reasonably plausible endgame for TPTB, taking into consideration all the various conspiracy subjects you’ve studied, and you envision that coming to fruition, I challenge you to lay out an explanation for how the Jews as a group do not stand to gain the most. Or, at the very least, I challenge you to arrive at that endgame in a way that does NOT include, in large part, Jewish machinations and Jewish power.

No matter where you look, their influence and presence is there. They control nearly all the means to which we continue to spiral into a tyrannical dystopia. It’s simply impossible to ignore, and therefore without the Jewish Question playing a central role in all these conspiracies we dig into, one is getting an incomplete picture at best, and is being willfully ignorant and dishonest at worst.

I could get into the details of Judaism specifically and its grotesque, hate-filled blueprint for world domination over all us “lesser than cattle” goyim; I could get into the vile and cruel things they teach about Gentiles and the ways in which those tenets are manifesting themselves in our world; I could get into specific examples of them acting out the Talmud in real life throughout history. But this post is long enough as is.

Whether you think all Jews subscribe to these ideas or not, and whether or not you believe the big picture isn’t in and of itself an explicitly Jewish conspiracy of world domination, you cannot with any honestly exclude the JQ from its rightful place in nearly all the conspiracy subjects we delve into.

NobleSavage #fundie newsone.com

I don't think anyone believes that someone who is part black can't be a "genius" and that's what all these people above are, PART BLACK (primarily due to the slave trade). One or two of them are actually Nubians, who have more genetic link to Indians and hardly any link to Black Sub Saharan Africans. Now look to the Southern African sub continent and you will have better luck finding a buffet, then you will a "genius". The fact that there is no record in the "White" world of any of the great Black geniuses of antiquity is all the more embarrassing, why would you not make record of it yourselves? Oh I forgot, you were too busy running from lions and cheetahs.

caamib #fundie fstdt.com

Amazing !

Three accusations, neither of which bear any resemblance to reality.

1. You claim I contradict myself, yet nobody ever managed to provide a single example. When they tried they have just shown that they don't understand and twist my words, like when they said I oppose rape and killing of Western women by Muslims but am for Islamic rule in fact I fully support rape and killing of Western women by Muslims but dislike that libtards like you want to make this legal just for Muslims. This is a huge difference. Modern Western women deserve to be killed by Muslims, but they also deserve to be killed by whites as well. You liberals just want them killed by Muslims but don't want them even touched by non-Muslim whites.

2. And then, after this, you make a strawman about some of the most basic things I believe - guess what, I don't believe in an "organized" effort against such men. I claim it was a spontaneous process that started in the 1920s with the 19th Amendment. These things happen very slowly and spontaneously. Hell, 19th Amendment was in 1920 and it took about 40 years for America to have its first slut generation.

3. In conclusion, even your third claim manages to be batshit - I don't "self-promote" myself as anything. I don't give a shit how anybody will see me nor do I get anything out of it.

So, another delusional moron living in lalaland who thinks he/she can criticize somebody while lacking basic knowledge about their ideas.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

The Olympic was deliberately rammed by the warship HMS Hawke!!

On September 20, 1911, the Olympic was on its 5th voyage from Southampton to New York. The ship was deliberately rammed by a waiting warship.

Captain E.J. Smith was the captain of the Olympic. Interestingly, he was also the father of twins.

On its way from Southampton, the Twin was rammed by a warship named HMS Hawke. The warship had an underwater ram that was designed to ram and sink ships.

The Hawke was waiting for its prey to enter the same narrow channel.

The Terrible Turks used ramming ships at the Battle of Lepanto in 1571, but that method of naval warfare became obsolete with the invention of gunpowder canon. Submarines made ramming ships totally obsolete.

The most extensive damage to the Olympic occurred underwater on the starboard side.

The ship was able to limp back to Southampton for temporary repairs.

After 2 weeks the Twin was returned to Belfast dry docks.

The extensive damage was to the bow or forward part of the starboard side of the ship. Fake images were later issued showing damage to the port side.

The Twins were switched in the Harland and Wolff dry docks!!

Once in the dry docks in Belfast, the damage to the ship was extensively investigated. The nautical engineers decided that they would have to rebuild the ship from the ground up to make it seaworthy again. Their solution was very simple: switch the ship with its nearby Twin.

Once in the dry docks, the holes in Olympic's side were patched up, and the name was changed to "Titanic."

It was just supposed to be a temporary fix until it hit the "iceberg" in the middle of the Atlantic.

We are supposed to believe that it took only 2 weeks for the extensive damage to the ship to be fixed.

[...]

It is beyond belief but 2 of the foremost citizens of the Republic were passengers on the Twins. Daniel Burnham was on the Olympic and Francis Davis Millet went down with the Titanic. Most Americans are not familiar with those names, but Daniel Burnham was one of America's foremost architects, and Francis Davis Millet was one of America's foremost artists.

On the night of April 15, 1912, architect Daniel Burnham was on the "Olympic," sailing from New York to Southampton, and Francis Davis Millet was sailing from Southampton to New York.

Both men were involved in designing the 1893 Columbian Exposition, and the Lincoln Memorial.

Against titanic opposition, both men suggested that the memorial be placed in its present position by the Potomac River.

Both men won nationwide fame because of the fantastic success of the 1893 Columbian Exposition.

Daniel Burnham and Francis Davis Millet designed the 1893 Columbian Exposition. It was lit up by Tesla's alternating current.

27 million people visited the fair, and most of them were awestruck by Tesla's alternating current.

White Star owner J.P. Morgan and Thomas Edison tried desperately to sabotage Nikola Tesla's alternating current.

The British desperately wanted a monopoly on AC because they realized that it would give them a quantitative industrial advantage over the United States. That is why they launched the War of the Currents.

President Lincoln was not on the Olympic, aka Titanic, but if he was alive at that time he was the type of U.S. patriot that the British would have loved to welcome for that doomed "maiden voyage."

Incredibly, the Great Emancipator had to wait for 60 years for a suitable monument in Washington City.

Against tremendous opposition, the present site was chosen by Daniel Burnham and Francis Davis Millet.

Francis was on the Lincoln Memorial Fine Arts Commission, and that was the reason he sailed on the "Titanic" to urge the acceptance of the Potomac site.

Burnham was on the "Olympic" and he realized that the "Titanic" would soon pass nearby. He decided to send greetings to his good friend Millet, but the steward returned the telegram saying that the operator had refused it.

Here is a quote from a very, very rare biography of Francis Davis Millet:

In addition to sending greetings in the telegram to the Titanic, Burnham wanted to alert Frank about an important letter awaiting him in New York that Burnham had written concerning the most recent meeting of the Lincoln Memorial Committee. On April 10, the very day that Frank had boarded the Titanic, the Lincoln Memorial Commission met at the White House to discuss designs for the memorial presented by architects Henry Bacon and John Russell Pope. The Act of Congress that had created the Lincoln Memorial Commission mandated that it avail itself of the services and advise of the Commission of Fine Arts, of which Burnham and Millet were the principal officers. (Engstrom, Francis Davis Millet: A Titanic Life, p. 7).

No iceberg hit the Olympic aka the Titanic....The most likely cause was a submarine awaiting some target practice. It was a bulls eye, as the ship was hit in almost the exact spot as the Hawke's ram.

No iceberg hit the "Titanic." It was most likely torpedoed.

The British were already teaching their German mercenaries how to build U-boats in anticipation of the coming world war.

Arthur Roston, captain of the HMS Carpathia, was chosen to "rescue" the survivors because he could be trusted to never reveal the exact location of the sinking!

When the "Olympic" was about (190 km; 120 mi) from the sinking ship, Captain Rostron radioed the Twin not to bother coming to the rescue. He claimed to have picked up all the survivors. The Twin did a u-turn and headed back to New York.

Now you can see why the sun never set on the British Islamic Empire . . . because the Almighty couldn't trust them in the dark....The Olympic and Titanic Twins Conspiracy is a deadly example of what happened when Britannia used Tesla's technology to MISRULE THE WAVES!!

Harrell Rhome, Ph.D. #racist gnosticliberationfront.com

[An article describing the story of Saint Simon of Trent, a 16th century boy allegedly killed by members of the city's Jewish community]

In 1588 Pope Sixtus regularized the devotions to Simon, giving his full and unqualified approval. Later in February 1755, Pope Benedict XIV cited it in his work, On The Canonization of Saints, and issued the Bull, Beatus Andreas, which gave full sanction and approval to the sainthood of Simon as well as the earlier martyr, Andreas of Rinn. In the late 1500s, Pope Gregory XIII visited St. Simon’s Shrine during the famous counter-Reformation Councils of Trent. During that time, hundreds of Cardinals, Bishops and Priests must have visited all the churches of Trent, including St. Simon’s tomb. This was a rarely disputed case. The Holy Church always affirmed the truth of the matter.

That is, until 1965, when Saint Simon was gravely dishonored. In a stunning move, Archbishop Alessandro Gotardi of the Diocese of Trent, in a sacrificial gesture to the prelates of political correctness declared that the Jews were innocent. This culminated years of work and pressure from liberal historians, operating in the climate of “openness” created by the Vatican Two Council, presided over by “the Ecumenical Pope," Paul VI. As a result of the decree of the Archbishop, the Vatican Congregation of Rites forbade the veneration of relics or the saying of masses in Simon’s name. This was an affront to the truth as well as a total depreciation of the five hundred years of prayer and devotion by devout Catholics to the little saint. Yet even in this climate of liberalism, it became clear that the Vatican had no intention of opening any more records into ritual murder cases.

Perhaps the Jews and liberals were gratified with the Church’s pitiful kowtowing to political correctness as the controversy began to subside. Maybe the church viewed de-canonization of too many saints at once as destabilizing. Nonetheless, the Ritual Murder Deniers celebrated a significant victory. One of the most famous and renowned cases of all was overturned and expunged.

And what, you may well ask, was the new evidence that cleared the conspirators in such an outrageous conclusion? Surprisingly there was no new evidence at all! The verdict was overturned because torture was used in the investigation. No one actually disproved anything. The evidence was deemed inadmissible under standards not even thought of 500 years ago. Shouldn’t we absolve all the murderers of old on the same basis? It appears that no one explored this possibility, and they never will because it is absurd. Nonetheless the liberals won their victory. No more explaining was necessary. As for the victim and the cause of justice? They did not address these concerns in 1965. Superfluous to say, we are thoroughly disgusted by the actions of a clique of deceitful court historians with an obvious ax to grind. We hope that some honest residents of Trent might build a new memorial to Little Simon, once deemed blessed, but this will probably never happen. We shall not wait and hold our breath, to be sure. Moreover, we do not have to wait at all. We can make our own memorial, right here, right now. This article is dedicated to historical truth and to the forgotten little murder victim, killed by a cult of pedophiles. If you are a religious person, please add your prayers. March 24 is his feast day.

PRAISE AND HONOR TO SAINT SIMON OF TRENT,

A LITTLE BOY BRUTALLY SLAIN BEFORE THE AGE OF THREE,

NOT LEFT IN PEACE, BUT TWICE MARTYRED.

ONCE BY HIS BESTIAL AND BLOODTHIRSTY KILLERS

AND THEN DECANONIZED, DISHONORED AND DISRESPECTED ON THE

SACRIFICIAL ALTAR OF POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS CORRECTNESS.

Requiescat In Pace
Anno Domini MMIX

THE ROMAN CHURCH AND RITUAL BLOOD CRIMES.

Blessed Simon was certainly not the only ritual murder martyr saint. Even though the Church disowned two of the most prominent, there are several others. Are these once venerated saints now just “holy stepchildren”, forever cast out of Catholic heaven? Apparently neither the Church nor the Jews want to talk about them. It would be embarrassing to say the least to admit that the infallible Vatican made misjudgments and mistakes in the cases . Is there any way that at least some of these children were not genuine victims of a pedophile murder cult? It seems unlikely, to say the least. Here are some of the best-known.

[List of similar cases of alleged Jewish ritual murder]

And never believe, even for a moment, that it does not still happen, deep in the dark, demonic depths of the occult underground, in the secret Synagogues of Satan, because it does!

Gregory Hood #racist amren.com

Scandinavian Airlines Erases Scandinavian Identity

“Once any group has been stripped of their identity and existence in theory, it is only a matter of time before someone will seek to strip them of their existence literally,” wrote Joel Richardson.

“Whiteness is not a culture,” said the late Noel Ignatiev, “but a privilege and exists for no reason other than to defend it.” He wanted to “abolish the white race,” but said this was a political project, not a call to genocide. “Perhaps AR should publicly call for the destruction of the black race,” wrote Michael Levin, “and then explain that this is just a way of criticizing affirmative action.”

Ignatiev at least said “Italian culture” and “Irish culture” are real. Today, even that may be politically incorrect.

“What is truly Scandinavian?” asked a recent ad from Scandinavian Airlines (SAS). “Absolutely nothing.”

“There is no such thing,” say two girls in the ad.

Posted on February 26, 2020Scandinavian Airlines Erases Scandinavian Identity
Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, February 26, 2020

“Once any group has been stripped of their identity and existence in theory, it is only a matter of time before someone will seek to strip them of their existence literally,” wrote Joel Richardson.

“Whiteness is not a culture,” said the late Noel Ignatiev, “but a privilege and exists for no reason other than to defend it.” He wanted to “abolish the white race,” but said this was a political project, not a call to genocide. “Perhaps AR should publicly call for the destruction of the black race,” wrote Michael Levin, “and then explain that this is just a way of criticizing affirmative action.”

Ignatiev at least said “Italian culture” and “Irish culture” are real. Today, even that may be politically incorrect.

“What is truly Scandinavian?” asked a recent ad from Scandinavian Airlines (SAS). “Absolutely nothing.”

“There is no such thing,” say two girls in the ad.

The ad says Scandinavian traditions and achievements came from elsewhere. “We’re no better than our Viking ancestors,” explains a black man.

image

The ad doesn’t say why SAS is a good airline. The ad is pure Woke Capital — a company pushing politics. If you know about Stonetoss, you’re probably thinking about his “Burgers?” cartoon.

image

The ad insults Scandinavians in three ways.

Scandinavians have no culture except what they took from others. “In a way,” says the narrator, “Scandinavia was brought here.”

Scandinavian identity belongs to everyone. Non-whites, including the black Viking, represent Scandinavia.

Finally, the few Scandinavian achievements the ad finds worth mentioning are egalitarian projects, including “our democracy” and “women’s rights” — but Scandinavia can’t claim these either. The ad credits democracy to ancient Greece and women’s suffrage to America. (Of course, linking modern Scandinavia to ancient Greece admits there’s a larger Western, white culture that goes back millennia.)

The ad doesn’t mention Scandinavian explorers, composers, novelists, commanders, or scientists.

The good news is that people hated the ad. On YouTube, about 13,000 people “liked” the ad, while 112,000 “disliked” it.

Danish People’s Party foreign affairs spokesman Soeren Espersen said SAS “spit on us.” “What nonsense and self-hatred,” said Swedish Democrats secretary Richard Jomhof on Facebook.

SAS pulled the ad from its website but didn’t apologize. It vowed to continue the campaign and released a shorter version with the same message. It said the problem wasn’t the ad, but the people who didn’t like it.

Some media agreed. “4chan Trolls Target Scandinavian Airlines With Racist Harassment Campaign,” said Mother Jones, comparing the flap to the “coordinated harassment campaign” of Gamergate. LoyaltyLobby, which tracks travel loyalty programs, said the controversy was “made up.” Aftonbladet’s Jenny Wennberg’s blamed Russian propaganda and said “only an idiot” would object to the claim “Scandinavia was brought here bit by bit.” Expressen cited reports that the criticism came from “hate sites,” the “extreme right,” and Russia.

Blaming “trolls” or “Russia” is a way to claim any opposition to the ad was fake. It’s true that the Russian outlet Sputnik posted an article about the ad on February 12. However, Twitter users were protesting the ad before that.

No national airway of any non-white country would ever say its people had no culture. No company would ever say a non-white race, region, or country had no culture. McDonalds, Target, and Disney and scores of other companies celebrate Black History Month. The film Black Panther invented fictional history to make blacks feel better. If whites adopt black, Hispanic, or Asian traditions, non-whites accuse them of “cultural appropriation.” Somehow, a black man claiming “Viking ancestors” is fine.

The SAS controversy may seem small, but it’s part of our race’s central problem. Those with financial and political power seem to think we shouldn’t have anything of our own. If we have no culture, why should we have countries? Journalists and academics can call “The Great Replacement” a conspiracy theory because there’s nothing there to be replaced.

This is why white identity isn’t just about biology, pride, or politics. It’s about survival. The SAS ad wasn’t just an insult. It was a warning.

John Hawkins #fundie townhall.com

There may be no official rule book for being a liberal, but that doesn't mean there aren't rules. There are actually quite a few rules liberals go by and the more politically active liberals become, the more rigidly they tend to stick to their own code of behavior. These rules, most of which are unspoken, are passed along culturally on the Left and viciously enforced. Ironically, many liberals could not explain these rules to you and don't even consciously know they're following them. So, by reading this article, not only will you gain a better understanding of liberals, you'll know them better than they know themselves in some ways.

1) You justify your beliefs about yourself by your status as a liberal, not your deeds. The most sexist liberal can think of himself as a feminist while the greediest liberal can think of himself as generous. This is because liberals define themselves as being compassionate, open minded, kind, pro-science and intelligent not based on their actions or achievements, but based on their ideology. This is one of the most psychologically appealing aspects of liberalism because it allows you to be an awful person while still thinking of yourself as better than everyone else.

2) You exempt yourself from your attacks on America: Ever notice that liberals don't include themselves in their attacks on America? When they say, "This is a racist country," or ",This is a mean country," they certainly aren't referring to themselves or people who hold their views. Even though liberals supported the KKK, slaughtering the Indians, and putting the Japanese in internment camps, when they criticize those things, it's meant as an attack on everyone else EXCEPT LIBERALS. The only thing a liberal believes he can truly do wrong is to be insufficiently liberal.

3) What liberals like should be mandatory and what they don't like should be banned: There's an almost instinctual form of fascism that runs through most liberals. It's not enough for liberals to love gay marriage; everyone must be forced to love gay marriage. It's not enough for liberals to be afraid of guns; guns have to be banned. It's not enough for liberals to want to use energy-saving light bulbs; incandescent light bulbs must be banned. It's not enough for liberals to make sure most speakers on campuses are left-wing; conservative speakers must be shouted down or blocked from speaking.

4) The past is always inferior to the present: Liberals tend to view traditions, policies, and morals of past generations as arbitrary designs put in place by less enlightened people. Because of this, liberals don't pay much attention to why traditions developed or wonder about possible ramifications of their social engineering. It’s like an architect ripping out the foundation of a house without questioning the consequences and if the living room falls in on itself as a result, he concludes that means he needs to make even more changes.

5) Liberalism is a jealous god and no other God may come before it: A liberal "Christian" or "Jew" is almost an oxymoron because liberalism trumps faith for liberals. Taking your religious beliefs seriously means drawing hard lines about right and wrong and that's simply not allowed. Liberals demand that even God bow down on the altar of liberalism.

Rameses2 #racist reddit.com

Europe acts like this as a counter-reaction to nationalism, which had fermented the Napoleon wars, toxic colonialism, World War I and II, and the Holocaust. Just like the 30 years war eventually led to religious tolerance and the emergence of Westphalian norms, World War II led to the end of ethno-nationalism. Europeans decided to move on from 1500 years of an obsession with ethnicity; they never expected the adverse consequences from it, because unlike Jews they take for granted having their own nations. They will soon realize the errors of their ways, but too late I am afraid.
Hahah next you'll tell me that it's unfair that Blacks are 70% of the NBA despite them being 10% of the population and it being a "White country." We're successful for the same reason Whites will be successful when they become a minority, so stop bitching because Jews are such a successful minority;
On a more serious note, I sincerely blame people like you for our current crisis. This same form of racism and xenophobia in the 20th century caused a backlash 50 years ago that enabled the liberal agenda. Actions have consequences, and treating minorities and women like shit allowed a political alignment to occur that destroyed the Supreme Court, academia, the media, and both parties.

Got Questions Ministries #fundie gotquestions.org

Question: "What does the Bible say about gay marriage / same sex marriage?"

Answer: While the Bible does address homosexuality, it does not explicitly mention gay marriage/same-sex marriage. It is clear, however, that the Bible condemns homosexuality as an immoral and unnatural sin. Leviticus 18:22 identifies homosexual sex as an abomination, a detestable sin. Romans 1:26-27 declares homosexual desires and actions to be shameful, unnatural, lustful, and indecent. First Corinthians 6:9 states that homosexuals are unrighteous and will not inherit the kingdom of God. Since both homosexual desires and actions are condemned in the Bible, it is clear that homosexuals “marrying” is not God’s will, and would be, in fact, sinful.

Whenever the Bible mentions marriage, it is between a male and a female. The first mention of marriage, Genesis 2:24, describes it as a man leaving his parents and being united to his wife. In passages that contain instructions regarding marriage, such as 1 Corinthians 7:2-16 and Ephesians 5:23-33, the Bible clearly identifies marriage as being between a man and a woman. Biblically speaking, marriage is the lifetime union of a man and a woman, primarily for the purpose of building a family and providing a stable environment for that family.

The Bible alone, however, does not have to be used to demonstrate this understanding of marriage. The biblical viewpoint of marriage has been the universal understanding of marriage in every human civilization in world history. History argues against gay marriage. Modern secular psychology recognizes that men and women are psychologically and emotionally designed to complement one another. In regard to the family, psychologists contend that a union between a man and woman in which both spouses serve as good gender role models is the best environment in which to raise well-adjusted children. Psychology argues against gay marriage. In nature/physicality, clearly, men and women were designed to “fit” together sexually. With the “natural” purpose of sexual intercourse being procreation, clearly only a sexual relationship between a man and a woman can fulfill this purpose. Nature argues against gay marriage.

Rebecca W #fundie answers.yahoo.com

As an anti-feminist woman (yes I AM a woman, yes I do identify in the outside world as anti-feminist) I have to say that I don't hate feminists. I totally disagree with about 90% of their beliefs. I dislike just about everything that is to be found in the feminist propaganda. I despise the feminist movement.

It is my contention that feminism has hurt women far more than anything men have done. I believe that the de-femiisization of women has been a major factor in the rise of depression in women and in the divorce rate. I believe that the emasculization of men has harmed men singularly and as a gender within our society. I am sick to death of reading all the little girlies spouting their feminist dogma when they haven't even left their parents homes to experience real life. And I can clearly see how much harm feminism has caused in our families and hence harmed our children and continues to harm our children. Therefore, I will always speak out against feminism, here and in the real world. And I further think that men speak out less becuase they are so vilified if they dare to raise their voices in their own defence.

Magister Eckhart #fundie theapricity.com

I think we're all ignoring the economic roots of this problem. All of these men have college loans, some near $100,000: without these loans, they can't go to school, something society has taught them they must do, but under that sort of debt, most can't get a good start in the job market. Add into this mixture the fact that the 19-27 demographic has an unemployment rate of something in the vicinity of 20 per cent in the United States, and you're looking at an entire generation who are not being allowed to move out of their parents' house unless they're willing to sleep on a park bench under a ceiling of cardboard. Frankly, it's not our fault and it's not our failure - many of us have already succeeded greatly, but our success means nothing because it is not producing any financial gain. I say "us" because I'm in this demographic, working a minimum-wage job for under 30 hours a week and struggling to survive.

While I will not dispute that the Baby Boomers have failed, their failures as human beings and members of the national community are far greater than their failures as parents. People born between 1945 and 1965 have destroyed the entire Western world, and now refuse to move out of the way so that we can fix it. We see a Negro elected president, the realisation of their dreams, and in a bad economy they refuse to retire and make space for the rising generation -- a generation which must bear a far greater burden than any of them, greedy, selfish, and solipsistic, have ever had to bear.

Maggie_T #fundie freeconservatives.com

Hey, morons! The man who's telling you that we'll all drown tomorrow is the same joker who credits himself with having invented the Internet. Remember? The "muse" that inspired Whatshisname Seagal to write "love Story." He's preying on your fears, you gullible fools! And yet you believe his apocalyptic rantings without question or thought.

Incidentally, has it ever occurred to you that this prophet of doom should at least pretend he sets the example by riding a bicycle, or something, instead of polluting the air with his private jet and his SUV?

Liberals and eco-nazis are all a bunch of dimwits who were born to be slaves to every con-artist out there. Barnaum was right: there's one born every minute. And they all vote democrat.

James D. Albright #fundie au.answers.yahoo.com

The Atheistic Science Cult has many sects including Heavens Gate and the Raleans. The Heavens Gate sect was told by demons that were posing as aliens that the Atheistic Science Cult told them existed in the Public Schools, that if they took their own lives that they would be rescued from the destruction of the earth, which is nothing other than a counterfeit end of the age scenario. The Ralean sect was told by demons posing as aliens, which the Atheistic Science Cult taught them in the Public Schools existed that if they built a flying saucer shaped building in Jerusalem, Israel, then and only then would they be rescued by aliens circling the earth in a space ship.
Whether you believe me or not you are going to miss being saved from being sent to the Lake of fire by Jesus because of your misguided beliefs that were instilled in you by the worse of the best secular businessmen in America. Jesus loves you and died for you too. I hope you change your mind and I will see you in the new heaven and the new earth where we will return to enjoying living a sinless state through the Holy Spirit instead of living through the Devil via the awareness of good and evil in the lake of fire.
James D Albright

DukeofQin #fundie reddit.com

China’s salvation.

The fundamental flaw in the existing Chinese nation is the continued existence of the so-called “Chinese” Communist Party and its hold on power over the organs of the state. The reason why this should no longer be so are myriad but the most succinct reason is that the Communist Party represents a foreign transplant ideology and culture that is distinctly ahistorical and unChinese. The Communist Party is therefore illegitimate. However, consideration must be taken in that the solution to the problem does not end up being worse than the original predicament. The most vocal opponents of the Communist Party both within and without China are the self styled Democratists who champion Western Liberalism as it is practiced in Europe and the United States. However they are not a true opposition to the Communists as they are in fact their doppelgangers hewn from the same Western milieu. The motto of the Communist Party is that only Socialism can save China, under the aegis of a single Marxist-Leninist vanguard party. The motto of the Democrats is that only Socialism can save China, under the aegis of two Marxist-Leninist vanguard parties. The end goal of both the Communists and the Democrats are the same, to ape the reigning Weltanschauung of the West, their only difference is in who should be in the driver’s seat.

The problem lies in the goal itself in that the total Westernization of China ultimately means China’s suicide. As the originators, innovators, and most accomplished practitioners of Western Liberalism are in the West, the legitimacy of any Liberal Democratic Chinese polity will ultimately be forever beholden to the West. That is any deviation from the reigning Western consensus is punished by deligitmization in the form of being labeled insufficiently democratic. Furthermore the core ideology that governs the West is at present virtually indistinguishable from the Communist Party in essence if not in form and has degenerated into what can best be described as Tartarism. What is Tartarism you ask? Tartarism is a social-governmental arrangement in which alien elite, actively hostile to the majority population, seeks to govern by dissolving the ethnic consciousness and cultural distinctiveness of said majority into an indistinctive lump in their imperial soup.

Just as the Manchu Qing usurpers claimed the mantle of the Chinese nation and enslaved the Han with the aid of various compradors and collaborators, the current socio-governmental system as embodied by the West consists of a thoroughly Judaized elite waging a subversive war to destroy the vitality of their respective nations by changing the demographic profile of their societies.

Since Western Liberalism is not a solution to China’s existing predicament, the only remaining solution is for China to chart her own distinctive political course. For many, a return to tradition would seem to be in order. That is the restoration of an emperor as the foundation of government and legitimacy. Unfortunately such romanticism is ill advised because it is precisely the imperial system, or rather its failure that has led us to the China of today. It is simply not only the problem of a “bad” emperor that can bring disaster, but rather even a good emperor is no guarantee of anything. The crux of the issue that the emperor, by virtue of being the emperor, stands above and beyond the lives of regular citizens. By being so detached, even a good emperor stands at risk of developing a fatal case of nobless oblige where his magnanimity can turn out to be disastrous in the long run. Still the optimal form of government has always involved some form of autocracy because the very fundamental nature of democracy means that it must be dysfunctional. By granting political power to everyone in the form of a vote, you grant it to no one because the value of a vote is diluted by its universality. In addition, a democracy assumes the fundamental equality of all voting constituents which flies in the face of empirical evidence. Not all individuals are equal and the voice of neither a fool nor ten thousand fools is worth that of one wise man. Thus political rights should and must be restricted in some manner for the good of all.

The question then remains as to how political rights must be structured and restricted in a post-Communist China. The first strata that must be disenfranchised are naturally women. Giving women political power over men is a more mendacious and reckless act than providing a loaded firearm to an infant. It endangers not just one family but that of the whole nation. The obvious next choice would be the non-Han minorities. China is and shall always be the domain of the Han race. There must be no exceptions to this restriction because one exception begins us down the slippery slope of more exceptions. Non-Han minorities should never exercise political over the Han. The next but not the most obvious choice should be the elderly. Citizens over the age of 65 should have no political rights. This is primarily to avoid the inevitable problem of gerontacratic capture that presently ensnares the West. The elderly vote much more consistently and in greater numbers than any voting block and their primary concern seems to be to keep the flow of government redistribution heading in their direction. This has not proven to be a problem in other Chinese micro-polities, but it is better to be safe than sorry and nip this potential problem in the bud. Education restrictions are generally a poor choice since the educational system in China, as it is becoming in the West, mere credentialism and the over-educated tend to over-indulge in liberalism. The lumpen proletariat and lumpen bourgeoisie are the backbone of any nation and they must not be excluded. The next and most difficult step is to configure a polity that can escape being seized by the plutocracy. This is already a problem in that the capitalist class in China is as materialistic and traitorous as any other and twice as self serving. Hong Kong and Singapore are already controlled by monopolistic cartels and property tycoons who have no compunctions about squeezing every last ounce of sweet and blood from the citizens and show no compunction against importing hostile racial aliens as a means to save or make more money. This is particularly difficult because money will always be wedded to political power and thus to work against this is to work against human nature. Since oligarchy is the default system of human hierarchical organization attempting to interfere in this usually results in externalities. The most brute force method is to restrict political rights to only those who have served 5 or more years in the military. This may be overly restrictive and results in a sample too unrepresentative of the Chinese people but it may be the only panacea to this most vexing of dilemmas.

In sum, the post Communist Chinese state must be governed by male Hans between the ages of 23-65 with a conditional 5 years of military service.

Nigel Farage #conspiracy #racist #fundie theguardian.com

Nigel Farage under fire over 'antisemitic tropes' on far-right US talkshow

Exclusive: Brexit party leader referred to ‘new world order’ in interviews with Alex Jones

Nigel Farage is facing strong criticism from Jewish organisations and a series of other groups after it emerged he repeatedly took part in interviews with a far-right US talkshow host, during which the Brexit party leader openly discussed conspiracy theories, some of which have been linked to antisemitism.

A Guardian investigation has found Farage has appeared at least six times on the show of Alex Jones, who was sued by bereaved parents after claiming a US school shooting was faked, and was banned permanently from Facebook last week.

Among those expressing alarm at the spread of conspiracy theories is a father whose six-year-old son died in the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting, and a man whose son died in the London bombings on 7 July 2005, which Jones has claimed were a government plot.

Farage, who led Ukip for many years, quit the party last year because he said he disliked its hard-right, anti-Islam stance under Gerard Batten. However, the website that Jones fronts, Infowars, regularly features anti-Islam stories.

In his various appearances on Jones’s show, Farage discussed themes commonly associated with an antisemitic conspiracy theory that Jewish financiers are behind a plot to replace nation states with a global government.

In the six identified interviews, which date from 2009 to last year, Farage, whose Brexit party is leading polls for the upcoming European elections, repeatedly uses words and phrases such as “globalists” and “new world order”, which regularly feature in antisemitic ideas.

In the interviews, Farage also says:

Members of the annual Bilderberg gathering of political and business leaders are plotting a global government.

The banking and political systems are working “hand in glove” in an attempt to disband nation states.

“Globalists” are trying to engineer a world war as a means to introduce a worldwide government.

Climate change is a “scam” intended to push forward this transnational government.

In the most recent interview, filmed in April last year, Farage said the EU is “the prototype for the new world order”, and “globalists have wanted to have some form of conflict with Russia as an argument for us all to surrender our national sovereignty and give it up to a higher global level”.

In an earlier interview with Jones, who is also banned from Twitter, Farage mentions Bilderberg, saying: “These lunatics genuinely believe that they know what’s best for us, genuinely believe in this concept of global government, and it will be a disaster.”

Later in the same interview, from June 2010, Farage argues Bilderberg members, along with other supposed plotters, could soon start “censoring and maybe ultimately even imprisoning those who challenge them and fight them”.

A spokesman for the Board of Deputies of British Jews said: “It is vital that our politicians distance themselves from conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists, including those who trade in antisemitic tropes. We would call on Nigel Farage to repudiate these ideas and to commit not to dignify oddball nasties like Alex Jones with his presence again.”

The Community Security Trust, which monitors antisemitic sentiment, said Jones was “a notorious conspiracy theorist who should be beyond the pale for any mainstream politician”.

A spokesman said: “Furthermore, for Jones’s conspiracy-minded audience, Farage’s references to ‘globalists’ and ‘new world order’ will be taken as familiar codewords for antisemitic conspiracy theories.”

A spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain said Farage’s close links with Jones and Infowars “demonstrates a serious lack of judgment by Mr Farage and a willingness to tolerate Islamophobia”.

The Labour MP David Lammy said the interviews showed “serious questions should be asked about Farage’s associations and networks”.

He added: “His indulgence in conspiracy theories about a ‘new world order’ should send chills down the spine of all who are aware of how these tropes have been used in the past.”

Graham Foulkes, whose 22-year-old son, David, was among 52 people killed by Islamist attackers on 7 July 2005, said he was aghast at Farage’s decision to be interviewed by Jones so many times.

“It fills you with despair that such a high-profile politician could even consider giving people like that the time of day,” he said. “It’s hard to understand. There can be no rational motivation to speak to people who are, shall we say, in need of help.”

Lenny Pozner, whose six-year-old son, Noah, was the youngest of 26 people shot dead at Sandy Hook, has sued Jones for saying the massacre was faked. In a recent legal deposition, Jones said he had argued this because of “psychosis”.

In a statement to the Guardian, Pozner said: “When people hear stories like mine, where conspiracy theorists or purveyors of fake news are destroying an individual or a family, they often feel sympathy or express their shock or horror over the ways that these people are affecting our lives. But many fail to realise that this behaviour doesn’t simply affect me or other victims of mass-casualty events.

“When people in positions of authority or influence consume, perpetrate, and regurgitate conspiracy theories, they legitimise the lie, they normalise the hate, and build policy that affects every citizen on this planet.”

Farage and the Brexit party were contacted for comment.
April 2018

Jones: “Why is the left allied with radical Islam?”

Farage: “Because they hate Christianity. They deny, absolutely, our Judeo-Christian culture, which if you think about it actually are the roots, completely, of our nations and our civilisation. They deny that. They also want to abolish the nation state – they want to get rid of it. They want to replace it with the globalist project, and the European Union is the prototype for the new world order.”
August 2016

Farage: “If America, as the leader of the western world, once again becomes the leader of the free world, well then I think, basically, we will have done away with the globalists.”
November 2012

Farage: “The fact is that the banking system and politics became hand in glove – one and the same thing. And that’s been a complete disaster. The amazing thing is, we have had elected prime ministers in Greece and Italy removed by the bully boy bureaucrats and replaced by former Goldman Sachs employees. You honestly cannot believe what is going on.”

June 2010

Farage: “You mention yourself the Bilderberg group – these lunatics genuinely believe that they know what’s best for us, genuinely believe in this concept of global government, and it will be a disaster.”
February 2010

Farage: “Yes, it all fits together, doesn’t it? Hand in glove – the big businesses, the bureaucrats, they have the sole right to make laws. It all fits together. They’re all very happy with the world they’re creating.”
December 2009

Farage: “We have a political class across the world that are basically aiming for a form of global governance. If you don’t believe me, look at what’s happening in Copenhagen. Governments are sitting there trying to sign us up to treaties on a very, very questionable concept of global warming caused by C02 emissions.”

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

Knights of the Ku Klux Klan
The Ku Klux Klan, commonly referred to as the KKK, was purportedly founded on December 24, 1865, by six Confederate veterans in Pulaski, Tennessee during the Reconstruction Era post American Civil War. The secret society was first known as the "Kuklux Clan", a name derived from the combination of the Greek words “kyklos” (??????), meaning “clan” and “kuklos” (??????), meaning “circle”, inferring a circle or a band of brothers. Aside from term “Knights”, which has historically been used by orders affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church, the logo of the KKK bears a Roman Cross superimposed with an icon representative of the number “6” which equates to the letter "F" or the " ?" (i.e., the double-cross) in the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet). As witnessed by the numerous KKK members who were tried and convicted decades after their respective hate crimes, the double-cross is always in play. In other words, members of the KKK are routinely sacrificed once they have fulfilled their respective missions. Fifty years after its inception, the KKK re-established itself in Atlanta, Georgia in 1915 atop Stone Mountain. Founder William J. Simmons and other were members of the Knights of Mary Phagan, a secret society likely affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church. Consequently, the organization and its chapters adopted regalia featured in “The Birth of a Nation” (1915), including white costumes, robes, masks and conical hats which are coincidentally also Greco-Roman in origin. The KKK also began to use paraphernalia adorned with a white Roman Cross on a red shield. At its peak, Klan membership reportedly exceeded 4 million and was comprised of 20% of the adult white male population. However, as of 2012, the KKK was estimated to have between 5,000 and 8,000 members and 150 Klan chapters. It is classified as a hate group by the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center. Aside from the Southern Cross of New Orleans, Knights, orders and secret societies affiliated with the KKK include but are not limited to: the Bayou Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Church of the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan; the Imperial Klans of America, Knights of Mary Phagan, the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Knights of the White Camelia, the True Ku Klux Klan. the United Klans of America (UKA), the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, and the Women of the Ku Klux Klan.


KKK Under CIA Control
Similar to most secret societies (e.g., Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, etc.), the KKK claims that it is not one organization but rather that it is composed of small independent chapters. They also claim that they never operated under a centralized structure, despite the existence of the United Klans of America (UKA), one of the largest Ku Klux Klan organizations in the U.S. which admittedly had “tens of thousands” of members. Nevertheless, modern historical sources emphatically state that “there was little organizational structure above the local level”. Klan organizers entitled "Kleagles" reportedly traveled the country, signing up hundreds of new members who paid initiation fees, receiving KKK costumes in return. Historical sources state that “The organizer kept half the money and sent the rest to state or national officials”, further confirming a top down command structure within the KKK. Whether the Fraternal Order of the Eagles is connected to the Kleagles and the KKK is not known, but they both appeared in America around the same general time. The first national leader and Grand Wizard of the KKK, Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, boasted that the Klan was a nationwide organization of 550,000 men and that he could muster 40,000 Klansmen within 5 day notice. Needless to say, this would not be possible if there was no centralized structure within the Klan. Although the KKK claims to be an "invisible" group with no membership rosters, no chapters, and no local officers, in 1925 a Klansman was bribed for the secret membership list and subsequently exposed Klansmen running in the state primaries. Modern historical accounts even state that the so-called “second Klan was a formal fraternal organization, with a national and state structure”, rendering the aforementioned claims of independence obsolete. During the Civil Rights Movement in the American South, the KKK forged alliances with the police department in the South (e.g., Birmingham, Alabama) and with Southern governors (e.g., George Wallace of Alabama). The fact that they conspired with the state to commit acts of terror across the South confirms that the KKK was in fact a state-sponsored terrorist organization. According to historian Brian R. Farmer, "two-thirds of the national Klan lecturers were Protestant ministers”, a statistic which suggests that there was a federal program to incite hate across the South. It has also been revealed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has paid informants within the Klan who were active in Birmingham in the early 1960s. In 1964, the FBI's COINTELPRO program admittedly infiltrated and disrupted civil rights groups from within while the KKK attacked them publically. In other words, the FBI and the KKK worked in unison to destroy the Civil Rights Movement which was bringing black and white people together, a threat to the establishment and the status quo. The notion that the KKK is intimately affiliated with the FBI was further confirmed when Bill Wilkinson of the Invisible Empire, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, was revealed to have been working for the FBI. Due to the KKK’s uncanny ability to avoid prosecution for their hate crimes and their intimate relationship with the U.S. government, namely the FBI, it can be ascertained that the organization is highly organized and under command and control of the CIA of Switzerland.

KKK & Prohibition
The KKK’s allegiance to the U.S. government was never more apparent than during prohibition which decimated rural America’s self-sustainability and caused widespread economic damage the country. Historian Prendergast stated that the KKK’s "support for prohibition represented the single most important bond between Klansmen throughout the nation”. This confirms, albeit in a de facto manner, that the KKK was on the payroll of the U.S. government. In 1922, two hundred Klan members set fire to saloons in Union County, Arkansas, terrorizing the South. Their use of violence against bars, bootleggers and distilleries was widespread, working hand in hand with the U.S. government against the people of America.

KKK Legislation
In response to KKK-related violence, the U.S. federal government passed the Force Acts in 1870 and 1871 which were allegedly used to prosecute Klan crimes. However, in 1876, the Supreme Court of the United States eviscerated the Ku Klux Act in “United States v. Cruikshank” (1875) when they ruled that the federal government could no longer prosecute individuals although states would be forced to comply with federal civil rights provisions. The result was that African Americans were at the mercy of hostile state governments that refused to intervene against their own private paramilitary groups. In other words, there would be no federal prosecution of the Klan and therefore they could continue terrorizing the South as they pleased. Six years later, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in “United States v. Harris” (1882) that the Klan Act was partially unconstitutional. They stated that Congress's power under the Fourteenth Amendment did not extend to the right to regulate against private conspiracies. Again, the U.S. federal government openly allowed the Klan to operative with impunity, repealing all federal laws that could be used to prosecute them. Therefore, it must be concluded that the KKK was a federally funded program that they did not want to interrupt.

Terror Arm of Democratic Party
Evidence acquired to date indicates that the KKK was primarily used as the terror arm of the Democratic Party. According to historian Eric Foner: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party…Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society. It aimed to…destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life”. According to historical sources, “The members of the first Klan in the South were exclusively Democrats”, launching a "reign of terror against Republican leaders both black and white. Those political leaders assassinated during the campaign included Arkansas Congressman James M. Hinds, three members of the South Carolina legislature, and several men who served in constitutional conventions”. The Klan also attacked black members of the Loyal Leagues and intimidated southern Republicans and Freedmen's Bureau workers. They killed black political leaders, heads of families, and leaders of churches and community groups because they had prominent leadership roles in society. In North and South Carolina alone, within an 18-month period from ending in June of 1867, there were 197 murders and 548 cases of aggravated assault”. To add insult to injury, the KKK made people vote Democratic and gave them certificates of the fact. Again, the KKK was working hand in hand with a state-sponsored political party, further confirming that they themselves were in fact state-sponsored.

KKK Cover
Although a federal grand jury determined that the Klan was a "terrorist organization” in 1870, its member remained free to terrorize the South for over a century. Reason being, the KKK was a cover for federal intelligence operation being executed in the South. If a politician or labor party leader needed to be assassinated, their subsequent murder would be blamed on the Klan. In other words, the KKK was the scapegoat for thousands of acts of state-sponsored terrorism. The notion that the KKK was nothing more than federal cover was corroborated by historical sources which state in-part: “Many people not formally inducted into the Klan had used the Klan's costume for anonymity, to hide their identities when carrying out acts of violence…While people used the Klan as a mask for nonpolitical crimes, state and local governments seldom acted against them.” The fact that the government did not prosecute said crime further confirms that the KKK was a state-sponsored organization. This notion was also substantiated by a Georgia-based reporter who wrote in 1870: "A true statement of the case is not that the Ku Klux are an organized band of licensed criminals, but that men who commit crimes call themselves Ku Klux.” Historical sources also state that: “The "Ku Klux Klan" name was used by a numerous independent local groups opposing the Civil Rights Movement and desegregation, especially in the 1950s and 1960s.”

“The Birth of a Nation”
Just prior to the Ku Klux Klan re-establishing itself atop Stone Mountain in Georgia, a film entitled “The Birth of a Nation” (1915) was released nationwide on February 8, 1915. In short, the film served as the advertisement for the new and improved KKK. The film was allegedly based on Thomas Dixon, Jr.’s book “The Leopard's Spots” (1902), as well as his book and play entitled “The Clansman” (1905). Dixon stated that his purpose was "to revolutionize northern sentiment by a presentation of history that would transform every man in my audience into a good Democrat!" In other words, his work was designed to reignite racial and political tension between the North and South along the lines of the previously fought American Civil War. In “The Clansman”, Dixon falsely claimed that the KKK had used burning crosses when rallying to fight against Reconstruction. Nevertheless, film director D. W. Griffith repeatedly portrayed an upright Roman Cross on fire in “The Birth of a Nation” rather than the St. Andrew's cross which was historically accurate. Due to the movie, a burning Roman Cross has been associated with the Klan ever since. Consequently, William J. Simmons displayed an upright burning Roman Cross atop Stone Mountain during the KKK’s second founding. Because “The Birth of a Nation” (see movie) was a Hollywood propaganda film that mythologized and glorified the Ku Klux Klan, it made the terrorist organization a household name overnight. The film is credited with single-handedly reviving the KKK in America. By portraying the Ku Klux Klan a heroic force, the film created an artificially induced Klan craze, exactly as it was designed to do. Needless to say, the movie has been used as a recruiting tool by the KKK ever since. At the official premiere in Atlanta, Georgia, members of the Klan rode up and down the street on horses in front of the theater, a publicity stunt designed to invoke fear in the South. As depicted in the movie poster for “The Birth of a Nation”, much of the modern Klan's iconography, including the standardized white costume, the white cross on a red shield, and the burning cross, were all derived from the film. Under Democratic U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, the “The Birth of a Nation” was the first motion picture to be screened at the White House. In order to create even more racial tension and turmoil in America, Wilson, a Southerner, endorsed the film. According to a Hollywood press agent, Wilson stated after watching the film, "It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true”. Naturally, Wilson's alleged remarks generated a national scandal, causing Wilson’s staff issued an official denial on April 30, 1915. According to a press release from Wilson's aide, Joseph Tumulty, "The President was entirely unaware of the nature of the play before it was presented and at no time has expressed his approbation of it”. Due to its phenomenal success in causing unprecedented racial division in America, the “The Birth of a Nation” is often ranked as one of the greatest American films of all time.

Anti-Catholic Agenda
In order to publically disassociate itself from the Roman Catholic Church, it’s alleged founder and funder, the Ku Klux Klan has disseminated various forms of anti-Catholic propaganda, especially since its second founding in 1915. Shortly after the pro-KKK Hollywood propaganda film entitled “The Birth of a Nation” (1915) was released in America, the KKK suddenly focused on the impending threat of teh Catholic Church, resorting to anti-Catholicism and nativism. Although a book entitled “Klansmen: Guardians of Liberty” (1926) was allegedly responsible for fostering the Anti-Catholic sediment, it’s far more likely that the Catholic Church wanted to distance itself from the KKK after funding the aforementioned film which generated an uncontrollable and unpredictable KKK movement. In a cartoon from 1926, the Ku Klux Klan is depicted chasing the Roman Catholic Church (personified by St. Patrick) from the shores of America. The "snakes" in the cartoon are labeled with the negative attributes of the Church, including superstition, union of church and state, control of public schools, and intolerance. In another carton from 1926 entitled "The End", a KKK member is depicted with an American flag and a Bible sitting atop a fat Roman Catholic priest. Historian Roger K. Newman stated that KKK politician Hugo Black "disliked the Catholic Church as an institution" and gave over 100 anti-Catholic speeches at KKK meetings in Alabama during his 1926 U.S. senate campaign. Black was subsequently rewarded for anti-Catholic rhetoric when he was elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate later that year. Although Black said he left the Klan when he became a senator, it is highly unlikely. In 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed Black to the U.S. Supreme Court despite his activity in the Klan.

KKK Bombings
During the Civil Rights Movement and the days of Martin Luther King, Jr., there were so many Klan bombings in Birmingham, Alabama, that the city's nickname was "Bombingham". During the tenure of Bull Connor, the police commissioner of Birmingham, Alabama, Klan groups were closely allied with the police and operated with impunity, showing once again that the KKK was and is a state-sponsored terrorist organization. In states such as Alabama and Mississippi, Klan members also forged alliances with the governors' administrations. When the Freedom Riders arrived in Birmingham, Connor gave Klan members 15 minutes to attack the riders before sending in the police to quell the attack. In Birmingham and elsewhere, the KKK bombed the houses of civil rights activists, also using physical violence, intimidation and executing assassinations. According to a report from the Southern Regional Council in Atlanta, the homes of 40 black Southern families were bombed between 1951 and 1952. The Ku Kulx Klan was responsible for numerous murders during the Civil Rights Movement, including but not limited to: the 1951 Christmas Eve bombing of the home of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) activists Harry and Harriette Moore in Mims, Florida, resulting in their deaths; the 1957 murder of Willie Edwards, Jr. Klansmen forced Edwards to jump to his death from a bridge into the Alabama River; the 1963 assassination of NAACP organizer Medgar Evers in Mississippi; the 1963 bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, which killed four African-American girls; the 1964 murders of three civil rights workers, Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner, in Mississippi; the 1964 murder of two black teenagers, Henry Hezekiah Dee and Charles Eddie Moore in Mississippi; the 1965 murder of Viola Liuzzo was transporting Civil Rights Marchers in Alabama; and the 1966 firebombing death of NAACP leader Vernon Dahmer Sr., 58, in Mississippi.

Knights of the White Camelia
The Knights of the White Camelia was purportedly founded on May 22, 1867 in Franklin, Louisiana by Colonel Alcibiades DeBlanc, a Confederate veteran. The name was derived from a snow-white flower of the genus Camellia, an apparent reference to the required skin color of its members. The secret society supported white supremacy, opposed to the Republican Party, and was very similar to the Ku Klux Klan with whom it associated with. Unlike the Klan however, which drew much of its membership from lower-class southerners and Confederate veterans, members of the Knights of White Camelia were mainly upper crust southerners, including doctors, landowners, newspaper editors, and officers. By 1870, the original Knights of the White Camelia allegedly ceased to exist. Like so many other secret societies, their alleged demise has likely been exaggerated. In other words, the Order appears to have gone undercover. Louisiana Judge Taylor Beattie, who led the Thibodaux massacre of 1887, and David Theophilus Stafford, the Louisiana adjutant general, were both member so the Order. In 1939, TIME magazine quoted West Virginian George E. Deatherage as saying that he was the "national commander of the Knights of the White Camellia", suggesting that the Order is alive and well. Based on their use of the Roman Cross and their close relationship with the Ku Klux Klan, it can be ascertained that the Order was founded and sanctioned by the Roman Catholic Church.

Henry Makow, #conspiracy thetruthseeker.co.uk

[Title : UNCLE SAM WANTS YOU GAY]

I've said this before but it's more true than ever. A satanic cult (Illuminism) is undermining our family identity to render us isolated, childless, sex-obsessed, dysfunctional, and docile.

I am referring to the Masonic Rothschild-Rockefeller cult-cartel that runs Europe and America and is behind Communism and Feminism. Destroying marriage and family was a plank in their Communist Manifesto (1848) and now is part of their satanic NWO.

We don't recognize that society is becoming gay because we think of homosexuality in terms of same-sex attraction. If we redefine it as "inability to bond with a member of the opposite sex for purposes of procreation," the gay trend is clear.

The American marriage rate has dropped almost 50% since 1970. Thirty seven percent of American children do not live with both biological parents, the highest percentage among Western nations, compared to 9% in 1965.

Almost 40% of children were born out of wedlock in 2005 compared to 8% in 1965.

Only one-in-four households consist of married couples with children, compared to two-in-four in 1960.

"The United States has the weakest families in the Western world because we have the highest divorce rate and the highest rate of solo parenting," says Rutgers Sociology Professor David Popenoe.

A defining characteristic of homosexuality is sexual promiscuity. Since media induced "sexual liberation," society has become obsessed with sex and all human relations have been degraded. (See my "Is this Gay Behavior Sick?" and "Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution."

Now the educational system is actually promoting sex to children. In Winnipeg where I live, a father complained this week that a public health teacher told his 12-year-old daughter's class to have sex at age 13. They were taught about flavored condoms and shown graphic pictures that appalled the children.

This action exposes the public school system for what it has become: an instrument of mass corruption, indoctrination and child abuse. With 13-year-olds told to have sex, is it any wonder they are inviting adult predators to their homes? (See "NBC Dateline: To Catch a Predator") How long will it be before pedophilia is legalized?

A strong marriage is the foundation of a family. Girls today will reach marital age feeling jaded and abused, and possibly already will have a child. Compare this to just 50-years-ago when sex was consecrated for marriage and family.

Schools are actually teaching children to adopt the gay lifestyle and experiment with gay sex. Courts are upholding the
right of schools to debauch children over their parents' objections.

Maureen Scott #fundie renewamerica.com

The Architect of Destruction

By Maureen Scott

"Obama comes from a community organizer background where it's us against them. But that's not who we are. And that's not the position the leader of our Nation should take." – Dr. Benjamin Carson

Obama appears to be a tormented man who is filled with resentment, anger, and disdain for anyone of an opinion or view other than his. He acts in the most hateful, spiteful, malevolent, vindictive ways in order to manipulate and maintain power and control over others. Perhaps because, as a child, he grew up around family members and mentors who instilled him with an abiding bitterness toward the U.S. That bitterness seems not to have left him.

It is not the color of his skin that is a problem – for anyone in America. Rather it is the blackness that fills his soul and the hollowness in his heart where there should be abiding pride and love for this country.

Think: Have we ever heard Obama speak lovingly of the U.S. or its people, with deep appreciation and genuine respect for our history, our customs, our sufferings and our blessings? Has he ever revealed that, like most patriotic Americans, he gets "goose bumps" when a band plays "The Star Spangled Banner," or sheds a tear when he hears a beautiful rendition of "America the Beautiful?" Does his heart burst with pride when millions of American flags wave on a National holiday – or is he moved to sadness and reflection when someone plays "taps" on a trumpet? Has he ever felt the depth of our admiration of the military, as lovers of those who keep America free feel when soldiers march by? It is doubtful – because Obama did not grow up sharing our experiences or our values. He did not sit at the knee of a grandfather or uncle who showed his medals and told of the bravery of his fellow troops as they fought and tramped through foreign lands sacrificing for a cause greater than their own lives. He didn't have grandparents who told stories of suffering and then coming to America, penniless, and the opportunities they had for building a business and life for their children.

Away from this country as a young child, Obama didn't delight in being part of America and its greatness. He wasn't singing our patriotic songs in kindergarten, or standing on the roadside for a holiday parade and eating a hot dog, or lighting sparklers around a campfire on July 4th as fireworks exploded over head, or placing flags on the gravesites of fallen and beloved American heroes.

Rather Obama was separated from all of these experiences. He doesn't really understand us and what it means to be an American. He is void of the basic emotions that most feel regarding this country and is insensitive to the instinctive pride we have in our national heritage. His opinions were formed by those who either envied us or wanted him to devalue the United States and the traditions and patriotism that unite us.

Obama has never given a speech that is filled with calm, reassuring, complimentary, heartfelt statements about all the people in the U.S. Or one that inspires us to be better, grateful, and proud that, in a short time, our country became a leader, and a protector of so many. Quite the contrary, his speeches always degenerate into mocking, ridiculing tirades as he faults our achievements ,along with any of his critics, all for the sake of a laugh, or to bolster his ego. He uses his Office to threaten and create fear while demeaning and degrading anyone who opposes his policies and actions. Unlike a secure leader, who has noble self-esteem and not false confidence, Obama displays a cocky, haughty attitude and a dread of being critiqued.

Mostly, his time seems to be spent causing dissention, unrest, and anxiety among the people rather than uniting us (even though he was presented to us as the "Great Uniter"). He creates chaos for the sake of keeping citizens separated, envious, aggrieved and ready to argue. Under his leadership Americans have been kept on edge, rather than in a state of comfort and security. He incites people to be aggressive toward, disrespectful of, and retaliate against those of differing backgrounds and views. Through such behavior, Obama has lowered the standards for self-control and mature restraint to the level of rowdy, street-fighting gangs. When, instead, he should be raising the bar for people to strive toward becoming more considerate, tolerant, self-disciplined, self-sustaining, and self-assured.

Not a day goes by that he is not attempting to defy our laws, remove our rights, over-ride established procedures, install controversial appointees, enact divisive mandates, and assert a dictatorial form of power.
Never has there been a leader of this great land who used such tactics to harm and hurt the people and this country.

Never have we had a President who spoke with a caustic, evil tongue against the citizenry rather than present himself as a soothing, calming, and trustworthy force.

Never, in this country, have we experienced how much stress one man can cause a nation of people – on a daily basis!
Obama has promoted the degeneration of peace, civility, and quality of cooperation between us. He thrives on tearing us down, rather than building us up. He is the Architect of the decline of America, and the epitome of a Demagogue.

sedg #fundie christianforums.com

Santa Claus = 666...(no joke)

Sorry if this is in the wrong forum.

Comments on the following ?

I've just today figured it out, and wanted to shout from the roof tops to warn other Christians, as it is now my duty to expose the unfruitful works of darkness...as it is for anyone that reads this.

First by using the following gematria:

A=6 B=12 C=18 D=24 E=30 F=36 G=42 H=48 I=54 J=60 K=66 L=72 M=78 N=84 O=90 P=96 Q=102 R=108 S=114 T=120 U=126 V=132 W=138 X=144 Y=150 Z=156

on SANTA CLAUS it adds up to: 666
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Then by looking at SANTA CLAUS from a anagram perspective we come up with:

SATAN LUCAS !!! Lucas being a form of Lucifer.

SANTA CLAUS = SATAN LUCAS

Thank you,
Yours in Christ Jesus
Shawn

Various Commenters #racist #sexist amren.com

RE: Black Rule: Stories from the New South Africa, 2011-2015

(Saul)

South Africa is in freefall. There is nothing that can save it now. Whites can save themselves only by segregating from the negro. If I were the leader of 1 million well armed white men, this negro worship would end. I would hold TV networks responsible for what they broadcast. If they air something that enflames the negro, I would shut them down. In a white homeland, negroes would be forbidden. This is the only way now.

Sweden has passed the Congo and is nipping at the heels of South Africa for rape capital of the world. Why? Because white women have more political power in Sweden than anywhere else in the world. There is no point to a white homeland - literally not worth the moving costs - if women are still allowed to vote, sit on juries, and hold political office. They will simply import Africans and Arabs to rape and murder.

The feminist white woman is the architect of the destruction of the Western world. Still vindictive, shrill, irrational after 50 years and show no signs of wanting to protect it. They have sided with every grievance group against the white hetero male. They show no sign of growing up sadly.

It's simply evolution. It's not something they can avoid. The same behavior is displayed by all sexually dimorphic mammals.

Think of the life cycle of a lion. A male lion will find a mate and have several cubs. The female is always on the lookout for aggressive males outside of her pride. She will entice any that she finds to come and fight her male. If the outsider male wins, he will kill her cubs and mate with her right then and there. The father lion always gathers up the bodies of his dead cubs and lays down beside them to slowly die of blood loss and infection while the mother of those cubs mates with the male who killed them.

When you hear of the Rotherham and Malmo rape gangs, as well as how white women defend them, understand that no words can sway a lioness to fight to save her children. Women are no different. They cannot be convinced.

Repeal the 19th. Repeal the Fifth Reform.

(CMK)

Your analogy is made even more powerful by the fact that the male allows the female to do this: he allows her to sabotage his pride, and risk the death of his children. It's the same in the West today: females only get away with this because the men allow them to. I suspect that, if lions have the mental capacity to think this far, the defeated male lion doesn't resist and kill the subversive female because he believes that it's simply the way things are in the world. Western men are the same: they don't understand that there was a time when women didn't have as much as they do now, and that the problems which exist now were more unimaginable than fantasies then.

I'm not advocating for killing women, but you get the point.

(Robert Kelly)

Sky News went to a township near Johannesburg to do our own impromptu survey asking men whether they had ever forced a woman to have sex. . .

In total, 28 out of the 38 that answered said they had raped a woman, and many even explained how and why. [Sky News, September 19, 2013]

And white men are accused of being the paragon of rapists and sex fiends by feminists everywhere. The only reason why women have rights is because white men have made it possible. If white men disappeared tonight and white women were left at the tender mercies of black and brown men, the above would be the result.

Left to their own devices, I don't think black and brown men see anything wrong with forcing themselves on a woman. To them, rape would only be wrong if another man raped a woman that "belonged" to him and even then, that's because of property rights not because he thinks rape is wrong.

(IstvanIN)

I know we shouldn't judge a book by its cover but look at those pictures above. Or look at the pictures of any of the blacks who have murdered young White people. The White young men and women are beautiful, the blacks not just beastly but clearly unevolved. They are not us. They are not our evolutionary, moral or intellectual equals. How did the charade of equality ever take such a foothold? How could so many White people be convinced of such an absurd idea?

Great Post - I really think their hatred of us and the unspeakable violence directed at us is precisely this - pathological envy or jealousy of our (relative) beauty and we must be destroyed, no matter how successful the black person is, he or she has pretty much told whites they despise them. Their natural enemy is the mirror and we can never make that right. The contrived bravado, arrogance, third - person references, huge gold chains, "grills", speech and dress codes, even the way they hold a glock, screams animus and insecurity.

And that is why, I am sure, so many black women go over the top with hair coloring, make-up, hair styles and clothes. They know they can never look like us no matter how much they repaint the old barn.

(Vir magnus)

In recent years, the white race has been portrayed to be the utmost perpetrators of racism, injustice, misogyny, homophobia, brutality, and genocide; they bring nothing but destruction. If this is all accurate, then one can only assume that South Africa would benefit considerably from the transfer of white power to black power within their government. Contrary to the fallacies that liberal professors convey into the minds of our youth, the complete opposite was true.
No one will discuss the fact that South Africa is now the headquarters of rape and HIV, that "94%" of murderers face no punishment. And that this trend worsens as the white population decreases.
This should come as no surprise, given that the average IQ of Africa as a whole stands at less than 70. It wouldn't have taken a rocket scientist to predict a rapid decline in the standard of living of South Africans post Apartheid.

I am curious to know if Robin Diangelo's anti white conceptions would change if she were to take a two year trip to Nyanga, South Africa. Perhaps gang rape would be enough to change her mentality.

(Frank Jones)

A more grotesque outcome one can scarcely imagine. Apartheid was a more humane and eminently more sensible system of governance.

LawrenceOfAperabia #racist niggermania.net

Got a chance to do some prime people-watching at the Seattle Central Library (that big glass-and-steel building with the was-the-architect-drunk odd angles downtown); normally I do my fancy book learnin' in Kent, but the economics and history section there is so small that I think I may have actually read every book of interest on that shelf.

So I headed to the big city, where you could read a book every day for a lifetime of triple-digit years and never get through them all. Found a book on the Great Northern Wars ("A Warrior Dynasty" by Henrik Lunde, the only thing Swedish about this tale) to enjoy.

The price paid for this literary find was an army of feral, homeless niggers who couldn't pronounce the word "library" if you tied them down and had R. Lee Ermey screaming at them that they wouldn't be allowed to go until they stopped saying "liberry." Outside the front, pavement apes begging for gibs. Third floor, idle, shifty niggers with nothing to do with their time except leer at the cute human girl working behind the reading-recommendation counter (not that they can read, so they'd have nothing to talk to her about besides their dicks), possibly only held in check by a security guard who looked like he could be Mike Pence's long-lost brother watching them in that way that white law enforcement does when there's niggers about.

Fifth floor, public computers; humans searching for jobs, niggers stinking out the joint and, I wish I were kidding, a buck actually watching porn on a public computer. I guess the library's filtering software missed a site.

Moving up, the "book spiral", floors 7-10, where they keep the nonfiction. White dudes playing video games on their laptops...and niggers sleeping or causing trouble. It was like I'd left a library and entered a multi-level Museum of TNB.

And finally, just to add a bit of insult to injury, the library has escalators that you can go up between the floors I just mentioned, but because of a design quirk, you cannot go from Floor 6 to Floor 5 going down without using either a fire-exit stairwell or an elevator.

And the elevator ride down after I got my book? A nigger so foul-smelling that when he got off at the floor with the bathrooms, his stink lingered the entire rest of the way down, a vile pall like the stench of a morgue with a broken refrigeration system in Miami in July.

I had my fill of coontacts for months, and the whole thing reminded me why I recused myself from being a front-line gentrifier in Pioneer Square and fucked off to the suburbs this past month. I'm happier here, where if I choose my locations well for errands and such, I can have a nigger-free day.

SoCal Mike #conspiracy wnd.com

The Federal Government is The Problem.
They are controlled by an internal 5th column that we defeated abroad during the Cold War but took us internally at home capturing our key institutions including the Democrat Party, our media, Hollywood and American academia.
And they are in bed with the Islamic Jihadis waging war on us.
They are the enemy.
How to stop?
Wish I knew.

CertifiedRabbi #fundie reddit.com

I don't really think that this should be a debate over how friendly or intelligent an immigrant group is. Most White Western expats are extremely nice, are better educated than the local population, commit low crime rates, and contribute more to the society through taxes than they take out through government handouts. And yet non-White people still don't want millions of us to flood into their countries and make them minorities in their own cities.
Heck, I don't even like seeing White expats in non-White countries. It's fucking weird seeing White expats wearing traditional Japanese attire and taking part in traditional Japanese cultural events. It would be even weirder if these White expats had these "fuck you" attitudes that non-White immigrants have in White Western countries where they unapologetically colonize your country while maintaining their own native culture. Could you imagine if Americatowns spread across Japan where you have entire cities speaking English and refusing to adopt the native culture?
And brown and black people don't have any problems with being racist towards us in our own countries and openly declaring their desire to keep us out of "their" communities. Just look at the huge number of brown and black people that now live in White Western societies freaking the fuck out whenever we White people start to recolonize our own cities. Brown and black people are completely flipping their shit over "gentrification", which is obviously a euphemistic dog whistle for racist brown and black people wanting to keep White people out of "their" neighborhoods (even though those neighborhoods were White and better off a few decades ago).
Tolerating immigrant groups like Sikhs might seem harmless at first, but if you understand the long-term consequences of adopting these dangerously permissive and welcoming attitudes towards foreign immigrants, then you'll quickly realize that your permissive and tolerant attitudes will result in White people becoming minorities in one neighborhood after the next, and then one city after the next, and then eventually becoming minorities in one country after the next - as is predicted to happen in America, Canada, Britain, Sweden, et cetera, over the next few decades.
When is it morally acceptable for we White people to put our foot down and stop our racial dispossession? When we're down to comprising only 75% of our national population? 65%? 60%? 55%? 51%? Or is it never morally acceptable to close our borders and prevent our racial dispossession? Are we just supposed to warmly welcome and celebrate our racial demise because Sikhs are supposedly model minorities, and because not doing so is dangerously racist and akin to slavery, lynchings, and the holocaust?
Pushing all of those ridiculous - and yet commonly presented - arguments against White nativism aside, I'd argue that keeping Sikhs and other non-White groups out of our countries can be justified on simple demographic mathematics alone. After all, there's more Indians in the world than there is White people. One fucking brown country has more people in it than the entire global White community combined. And so obviously we have to be hyper-vigilant when it comes to preventing mass Indian immigration into our societies because only 1% of their population migrating to a small White country will cause those White people to become minorities in their own homeland. That's why it's extremely important to realize that a certain level of racism - such as opposing non-White immigration into our countries - is simply necessary if we want to exist 100+ years from now.
It's nothing personal, but you Sikhs (and non-White people in general) have to be kept out of our countries if we simply want to survive as a race. Go be model citizens back in your own countries. Your native countries need all of the help that they can get. We'll be just fine without you.
And besides, why would you want to be a minority anyway? Wouldn't you rather live in a country dominated by our own people where you're completely free to be yourself? Don't you yearn to be back in India surrounded by your own kind? Don't you wish that you could see people that look like you respected in the media that you consume? Why would you want to put up with racist stereotypes like Apu and "thank you, come again"? Why would you want to be forced to conform to our social norms? Why would you want to worry about some random yahoo confusing your turban as Islamic terrorist garb and assaulting you? And why would you want to live in a country that will never fully accept you?
And don't you care that you're making the native population feel uncomfortable by colonizing their country? I'd personally be racked with guilt if millions of White people flooded into Japan and tried to force the locals to bend to our will and represent us in their media. And yet I don't think that I've even seen a single non-White person express guilt for making White people minorities in their own countries. On the contrary, they act as if we White Westerners have some kind of moral obligation to just completely bend over for them even though they'd never bend over for us if the roles were reversed.
Non-White immigrants actually have the balls to get in our face, denounce us as racists, physically assault us, and even show up with loaded semi-automatic rifles to shut down our speech by force if we try to stand up for our own racial interests in our own countries. Non-White people would never tolerate that level of disrespect in their own countries unless we forced ourselves upon them through old school military imperialism.
What a perfect testament to how cucked White people have become, which non-White people have picked up on instinctually. Much like how wild animals have become increasingly aggressive towards man after the environmental and conservationist movement severely reduced hunting, so too have people of color lost their fear of the White man due to the liberal "anti-racist" cultural revolution in recent decades. They know that we've become a bunch of pathologically ethnomasochistic cowards. And they know that the liberal media and countless extremely well-funded "anti-hate" NGOs have their back. And so they have no respect for us and absolutely zero fear of us retaliating against them as they brazenly get in our faces and push us around in our own countries.
And it's not like appealing to them morally will make a difference. The only thing that they'll respect is a reemergence and reassertion of unapologetic White ethnocentrism. And that's ultimately why the Alt-Right exists, and that's why people of color and self-hating Whites are so militantly opposed to us. They know that we have a liberal boot on our necks which is keeping us down, and they have absolutely zero interest in letting us get back on our own feet again. They instead want to finish off we "bad" Whites ("good" Whites hate themselves and support open borders) and kill us off for good by putting even more weight on our necks through increased mass non-White immigration and suppression of our speech.
And the supposedly nice and friendly Sikhs will reveal their shared animosity towards we "bad" Alt-Right Whites as they join in with the other non-White and White leftist mobs that violently attack our real world events and advocate for laws that criminalize our speech. And that's why the "model minorities" rhetoric doesn't fool the Alt-Right. Whether these non-White people in our countries are model minorities or degenerate ghetto brown trash, they're completely united in preventing White Westerners from reclaiming their own countries and preventing their racial demise.
And as you pointed out in a previous post on this subreddit, a lot of these people are hardcore ethnic nationalists themselves who are basically only living in White Western countries in order to make more money. So they're a 5th column security threat on top of being a unwanted foreign colonizer.

Ziggy #fundie debate.org

Actually, they are much worse than men. Women say that they are better than men to stroke their egos, but even those women know the truth.

1. Women are extremely insecure. This might be due to biology, but they use it as an excuse to treat others poorly and avoid responsibility for their actions.

2. Women lack self-criticism. They get super-defensive and hostile when someone points out that their behavior is detrimental to themselves and inconsiderate of others.

3. Women have a sense of entitlement. Perhaps this is consequence of #1 and definitely follows from #2. They think the world, and particularly the men in this world, should adapt to them and cannot be bothered to make an effort to make changes in their own habits to adapt to their surroundings. A good example is women who cheats on her husband because she gives in to her temptation but tries to claim that it was something her husband did to make her stray.

4. Women are dishonest. Men are also dishonest but women tend to be so with those who are close to them and often turn a blind eye to those who are hurt by their behavior.

5. Women lack a sense of justice. They perceive themselves as vulnerable, underestimate their own strengths, and rationalize their behavior by playing the victim and assert that they are acting in self-defense.

6. Women rely on intuition and emotion when it comes to decision making. They are capable of ratiocination just like men but prefer to trust their instincts instead of learning how to set boundaries with other people. They also believe their intuition is foolproof despite evidence to the contrary.

7. Women are intolerant. They view those with behaviors that they don't understand or don't recognize as a threat and lack the curiosity that men have to understand the world around them and investigate things that are unknown. Male curiosity and creativity is the mother of invention. That's why >90% of important scientists, inventors, and artists of all types are men. The fact that men cannot bear children inspires them to create things.

narudown #fundie forums.narutofan.com

[How exactly does gay marriage harm heterosexual rights]

I do think though that before I go I need to make one thing clear: defining marriage as being between a man and a woman only does not force gays to not be gay as I have heard many liberals say. It merely states that we are not obligated to recognise it. To be honest, the only forceful thing is that those who oppose it are being trying to be forced by law to recognise it. That's what would happen wouldn't it. We would have no legal choice correct. Isn't that a volation of my rights. Well, I digress.

Dynastia #fundie kiwifarms.net

[Topic called "Is Suicide Selfish?"]

Yeah, it is. With the exception of people with terminal illnesses, your problems are not so bad that suicide is anything but fucking ridiculous. Losing someone fucking sucks, and if you're willing to let the people around you go through that just because you think you have it like shit, you're selfish.

Everyone dies. It's the most natural thing in the world, and we all have to learn to deal with our loved ones dying. It's sad, and then you get over it, because that's what people do. If honestly you think people should feel obligated to suffer through a miserable life they don't want to live just so you don't have to deal with being sad for a few weeks, you're the selfish one.

what's a good reason to kill yourself?

Not wanting to live. That's good enough.

You really are a disgustingly selfish person, you know? I'm not even saying this to try and insult you or shame, I just think you have no idea how incredibly morally bankrupt you are because you're blinded by your own selfishness. You are quite literally saying that if a person is in such crippling overwhelming misery that they're ready to take their own life, they shouldn't do it because you will feel kinda sad about it, maybe even for a longish time, and they should consider your feelings first.

That's appalling. You are appalling. You are an appalling, disgusting human being. Just look at what you're saying. You're telling people with a case of the sads so extreme that they are literally ready to die to escape it that they should stay alive being that miserable, indefinitely, because if they die you'll have a much smaller and manageable case of the sads. You are looking at massive, unthinkable cases of the sads and saying "No, that's not as important as whether or not I feel a little bit sad and they should accept that." This is like telling a starving man he should give you his sandwich because you're slightly hungry. Your sense of entitlement is incredible, and your myopic blindness to it utterly disgusting. You might consider yourself a good person, you might do good things, make the world around you a little better, but I want you to know that no matter what you tell yourself, you are such a fundamentally selfish person that you assume starving men should give you their sandwiches.

You need to reevaluate your moral compass, because assuming your feelings should be the center of it makes you an appalling piece of shit, dude. Appalling.

I'm just saying, death is kinda permanent. There's better solutions. If you really feel like you can't handle it, fine, do it. I'll deal. Don't pretend like it's some big moral issue that I'm minimizing the pain of the mentally ill when you're minimizing the pain of the people around them. It's not like the death of someone close to you is something you shrug off, that's bullshit. Emotions are erratic, sporadic, and lie to you. I've felt that, friends of mine have felt that. Shit has looked bleak many times and we've carried on and had brighter days. Your feels are a fucking stupid reason to kill yourself. If I'm bankrupt for that, cool.

So now you're basically saying the starving man should give you his sandwich because if he works really hard he could have a roast dinner instead.

Morally bankrupt, dude.

Everyone that cares about you is going to fall asleep a couple of times a week trying to push your death out of their minds, wondering what they could've done differently. It's going to last the rest of their lives and it'll probably cause them to fail in the exact same way you did, you loathsome piece of shit.

lol no it's not, holy shit. What kind of weak shit is this? People die. Most of the people you love are likely to die before you. You get over it. It's not life-shattering, it's not unsurmountable, it's normal. That's what literally everyone who has ever lived does, and has been doing since people have been around. If you're so weak that you can't even cope with the basic fundamental reality of life and death that all of us are expected to live our lives around, then you should just kill yourself. Nobody would blame you (except entitled little pissbabies like you, I guess)

lol That's sociopathic.

Yeah, death happens. If you choose to inflict the grim realties of death on someone, you are either insane or a piece of shit lol.

I feel sorry for your loved ones, and hope you never put your sociopathy into practice lol.

So you think people should suffer through long miserable lives they don't want to live just so other people don't get bummed out for a while that they're no longer around being miserable? That's sociopathic.

Life sucks and it doesn't stop sucking until you die, but that doesn't give anyone the moral right to make it worse for others.

Cool so if you're in a shit marriage you should stay in it because your husband will be sad for a while that you divorced him?

It's your life. Nobody elses. Nobody else has the moral authority to tell you it's wrong to opt out.

I have experience in this field.

Pretty much everyone has experience in this field. Suicides aren't rare. I would honestly be surprised to meet anybody over the age of 25 or so who has never had a loved one commit suicide.

In the end though, people fall into two camps when dealing with it. Some people are reasonable, compassionate, understanding human beings who accept reality and move on with their lives. And some people are screeching crying selfish babies who want to yell at a corpse for inconveniencing them.

Ricardo Duchesne #racist eurocanadian.ca

On 27 May 2014 the Vancouver City Council voted unanimously to take steps toward yet another official apology for "historical discrimination against people of Chinese descent". The approved motion, which was initiated by Chinese Councillor Raymond Louie, contains a sweeping mandate directing staff to investigate thoroughly, "as long as it takes", every act of discrimination committed against the Chinese from 1886 to 1947.

It also calls for staff to report back to council with recommended actions for compensation and inclusive redress. According to Councillor Kerry Jang, the Chinese who lived in Canada before 1947 "weren't allowed to do very much...to live in certain areas...to go to school or do anything."

What Kerry Jang is saying is a historical fabrication.

The Chinese in BC prospered substantially despite the head tax and not having the right to vote until 1947. In an MA Thesis conducted by Chinese Canadian Paul Richard Yee for the University of British Columbia, 1983, under the title Chinese Business in Vancouver, 1886-1914, it is concluded that the Chinese were able to enjoy "economic opportunities arising inside and outside Chinatown".

Chinese Millionaire Migrants

Daniel Hierbert, a social geographer at UBC, has thus projected that Chinese migration will result in the creation of "a social geography entirely new to Canada". The Chinese, which currently make up about 410,000 of the population in a city of 2.2 million, are set to double to 800,000 by 2031. Hiebert also notes that the city will be increasingly divided into racial enclaves, with white residents becoming a minority group, or only 2 out of 5 residents by 2031.

This massive wave of Chinese colonizers has driven the price of homes way above what middle class Whites can afford, making Vancouver the second least affordable city in the world - behind only Hong Kong.

In Richmond, a city of 200,000 in greater Vancouver, mainland Chinese migration has already helped create the first majority-Chinese city outside Asia, with White citizens cornered into small enclaves and many being forced to sell their homes and move out as "millionaire migrants" take over (read here). It has been estimated that 74 percent of the houses sold for more than $3 million in Vancouver's core Westside neighbourhood in 2010 were sold to Chinese buyers.

Institutional Racism in China

But what is perhaps even more astonishing is that these "millionaire migrants" enjoying apologies from working and middle class Whites come from a culture that, by the standards of British Columbia between 1886 and 1947, are not merely illiberal but vulgarly racist. This has been thoroughly documented in the works of Frank Dikötter. Starting with his book, The Discourse of Race in Modern China (1992), Dikötter examines how traditional Chinese authorities commonly described as "ugly" the "ash white" skin and "indelicate hairiness" of Europeans, and the blacks as "animals, devil-like and horrifying".

More revealing is Dikötter's thesis on how these traditional Chinese notions about inferior "barbarians" intermingled with Nazi forms of "scientific" racism to form a distinctively Chinese racial consciousness in the 20th century and today. The concept of race came to be widely accepted as scientifically proven. Racial theories were disseminated through textbooks, anthropology exhibitions and travel literature, reaching the primary levels of education.

The dominant Han are described as the core of a "yellow race", which includes in its margins all the minority populations. In another book, Imperfect Conceptions: Medical Knowledge, Birth Defects, and Eugenics in China (1998), Dikötter references government publications claiming that eugenics is a vital tool in the enhancement of the "biological fitness" of the nation, heralding the twenty-first century as an era which will be dominated by "biological competition" between the "white race" and the "yellow race". A research team was indeed set up in November 1993 to isolate the quintessentially "Chinese genes" of the genetic code of human DNA.

The visit by Condaleeza Rice to Beijing in 2008 led to a flurry of racist postings on China's websites, with Rice stigmatized as "the ugliest in the world"... "I really can't understand how mankind gave birth to a woman like Rice"... Some directly called Rice a "black ghost", a "black pig"... "a witch"... "rubbish of Humans"... Some lamented: "Americans" IQ is low — how can they make a black bitch Secretary of State"... Others did not forget to stigmatize Rice with animal names: "chimpanzee", "crocodile", "a piece of rotten meat, mouse shit", "[something] dogs will find hard to eat".

Chinese elites have always been very cunning at using their quietness and cautiousness as a rhetorical device to delude Westerners with the quaint notion of Chinese innocence and purity. China is currently building an empire in Africa, based on the exploitation of cheap African labor, poor if any safety standards for workers, construction projects based on the cheapest and shoddiest Chinese materials — all in exchange for vital resources to feed the insatiable desires of 1.4 billion Chinese. That's the strategy: use dirt cheap construction materials to build up good will, then sweep in and take the natural resources. According to Peter Hitchens, Chinese companies have lax safety procedures and "employ African people in slave conditions."

Extermination of Ethnic Minorities in China

China's ethnic composition is almost exclusively Han, 91.9 percent of the population. The ethnic minorities (Mongols, Zhuang, Miao, Hui, Tibetans, and Uighurs) are treated as second class citizens. Tibetans are routinely described as superstitious, lazy, ignorant, and dirty. Tibet is an independent country occupied by Chinese imperialists; Han migration is destroying their heritage; Han companies dominate the main industries; the Chinese get all the best jobs.

The Tibetans are irritated that Chinese migrants eat their dogs (animals believed to be the last reincarnation before humans in Tibetan Buddhism); that the Chinese don't walk clockwise around temples and monasteries, and that they toss away their cigarettes at wooden temples and holy trees. The New York Times described an incidence of one man whose house was burned down for no evident reason as follows: when he tried to seek help, the authorities said, "What race are you? Tibetan? Go ask the Dalai Lama for help."

In 1949, Han Chinese amounted to only 5 percent of Xinjiang's population; today they are up to 41 percent. Urumqi, the capital city, consists of 75 percent Han Chinese, of the 2.5 million inhabitants. The average Chinese views the natives from Xinjiang as backward and as ungrateful for not appreciating the modern infrastructure bestowed upon them by the Han. In the summer of 2009, this region saw violent riots by 2,000 to 3,000 thousand Uighur workers and Xinjiang separatists, in which approximately 150 Han Chinese were killed. The Communist reprisals were swift; up to 50,000 police and security personnel were sent to restore order, more than 2000 Uighurs were detained, and a few dozen were executed. The policy of Sinicization was intensified; in May 2010 Beijing announced a new development strategy to pour $1.5 billion into the region, encourage the migration of more Han Chinese businessmen, together with a 'love the great motherland, build a beautiful homeland' patriotic education campaign that aimed to indoctrinate the Uighurs that "ethnic minorities are inseparable from the Han."

Clearly, it is superbly absurd and cowardly for leaders of European ethnicity in Vancouver to have endorsed a motion calling for more apologies in the context of a reality characterized by mass immigration from a country and an ethnic group that is currently complicit with vulgar and oppressive acts of racism.

Otfried Best #fundie youtube.com

(Grandiose trolling of German Neonazi at press conference)

Uwe Faust: "My name is Uwe Faust from the party The Party (Translator's note: founded by a satirical magazine). I'd like to ask Mister Best a question. Mister Best, according to Federal Building Code, Section 126, every owner is obliged to label his parcel with the number assigned by the municipality, Now, I've noticed, shockingly, that many house numbers in Völklingen are marked in Arabic numerals.

What would you like to do against this creeping foreign domination?"

(audience roars with laughter)

NPD (Nazi) Mayorship candidate Otfried Best: "Just wait until I am Lord Mayor, Mister Faust! I will change that. We'll put normal numerals in place!"

Original German
Uwe Faust: "Mein Name ist Uwe Faust von der Partei Die Partei. Ich hätte eine Frage für den Herrn Best. Herr Best, laut Baugesetzbuch, Paragraph 126, ist jeder Eigentümer verpflichtet, sein Grundstück mit der durch die Gemeinde vorgegebene Nummer zu kennzeichnen. Jetzt ist mir erschreckend aufgefallen, dass in Völklingen viele Hausnummern mit arabischen Zahlen gekennzeichnet sind.

Wie möchten Sie gegen diese schleichende Überfremdung vorgehen?"

Otfried Best: "Da warten Sie mal ab, Herr Faust, bis ich Oberbürgermeister bin. Da werd ich das ändern. Da werden doch ma' normale Zahlen drankommen."

Joe Wasp #wingnut #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Political Parties and Counter-Revolutions"]

The fiery piece published by Padraig Martin on June 19th [Submitter's note: see here] inspires a fire unkindled in the Southern heart for a number of generations. A short but sweet entry, his essays proposes the long overdue idea of walking away from the Republican Party. Seemingly preposterous on the surface to cede political power to the Left, this could facilitate a monumental political move if undertaken correctly. The issue then asserts itself: Southerners simply have no idea how to foment a rightwing, political, and cultural counter-revolution anymore. This short piece provides an answer to Padraig’s rallying cry to leave the Republican Party and also addresses the idea of how the Right should respond to the leftist overthrow of Southern society within the modern age.

Unlike our current predicament, where leftwing radicals are actually engaging in revolutionary violence and with widespread impunity, it must be made clear that it is not the intention of this article to inspire or condone violence. Rather, that peaceful and legal counter-revolutionary defenses and processes must be implemented, and with great haste. Rightwing dissident literature does not have the luxury of an impartial review.

Every vacuum must be filled. Leaving the GOP will create a vacuum and genuine conservatives need a party to insert political capital and energy into. This necessitates the formation of a new party, especially in Dixie. The issue facing third parties is twofold: everybody still wants to cling onto political power they fool themselves into believing they have by voting Republican, as well as the fact third parties aim far too high. A third party must focus on local elections and aspire no further than state level elections.

[...]

One particular overthrow of a widespread leftist regime took place during the 1870’s. Every Southern state, via a myriad of means, overthrew the Radicals which had oppressed them politically since the passage of the Reconstruction Acts of 1867. The *only* way they managed to do this was through the *establishment of parallel institutions,* not simply voting at the ballot box. The counter-revolutions took place at local levels and prepared for gubernatorial elections, not presidential ones. This not only necessitates the establishment of a new party but the establishment of interconnections among those of conservative persuasion, while excluding malicious and volatile actors. This means establishing Orania, South Africa influenced colonies in Dixie and ensuring members of the aforementioned new party procure positions within the political system at the local level. Other noteworthy rightwing revolutions were the Wilmington Insurrection of 1898 and the Red Summer of 1919.

Southerners have obsessed over voting for Republican presidential candidates in order to prevent the lesser of two evils from occupying the imperial office since the establishment of the States’ Rights Party in 1948, a party which would have found great success at the local level had it stuck around after the presidential election of that year. A vote for evil is still a vote for evil. Recent events have necessitated third party establishment. Yes, these supposed parallel institutions need monetary funding, but that has not stopped them from taking place in the past in grave situations. It is time not only to leave the GOP but to also build something to replace it for our people.

BCP #fundie uogcc.org.ua

The Eighth Pan-Orthodox Council, which is to take place on the feast of the Holy Spirit, 19 June 2016, will launch the process of expulsion of the Holy Spirit from the Orthodox Church. It will de facto be the beginning of gradual spiritual suicide – suicidium. The main initiator of the Synod is the apostate Patriarch Bartholomew and the apostate Patriarch Kirill. Both of them are under an anathema – God’s curse – according to Gal 1:8-9. Through “theological dialogues” with the apostate Vatican, they want the spirit of the New Age to infiltrate the entire Orthodox Church. The Pre-Council Conference conclusions are formulated in a positive light. However, they actually disguise the real intention, i.e. self-destruction of the Church as well as of the Russian and the Greek nation. Other Orthodox nations will likewise be drawn into this self-destruction process.

Merkel has enforced suicidal legislation and sodomism through an incomprehensible text of the Lisbon Treaty. A similar method of positive terms is applied by the Vatican globalists. Unfortunately, the apostate Patriarchs are in unity with them nowadays.

Apostasy of the Church

The planned programme of the Council for all the Orthodox Churches is to conduct so-called theological dialogues with apostate Vatican theologians. The Orthodox Church is thus certain to be infected with the heresies of the apostate Western Church. The Vatican’s programme is primarily the promotion of interreligious dialogue with Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and other pagans. This so-called dialogue is a betrayal of the Gospel. The Vatican is in unity with the NWO globalization programme whose aim is to create a global New Age religion which worships demons and, in the highest degree, Satan. This concerns the so-called Illuminati at the 33rd degree. Today they control the UN, World Banks, supranational organizations, and through the NWO they incorporate the programme of a global holocaust, so-called reduction of humanity to “the golden billion”. The responsibility for this upcoming holocaust of the nations rests with the apostate Vatican which betrayed orthodox doctrine!

The turning point came at the Second Vatican Council through the infiltration of syncretism and heresies. A similar turning point in the Orthodox Church is to come through the Eighth Pan-Orthodox Council. They will attach the Orthodox Church to the poisoned stream of apostate Western Christianity and establish unity through so-called theological dialogues. It is like creating unity with an infected person. The fruit is death.

David Barton #fundie rightwingwatch.org

On Friday, Republican political operative and Religious Right pseudo-historian David Barton appeared on the American Pastors Network’s “Stand In The Gap” radio program to discuss President Trump’s plans to “make America great again.”

During the discussion, Barton was asked how the Founding Fathers would have felt about Trump’s plan to implement “extreme vetting” of immigrants and refugees from predominantly Muslim nations. Barton said that the Founders would have supported such a move because, while America has always been very open about accepting immigrants and refugees, we only accepted those who intended to become Americans by assimilating into our Judeo-Christian society.

America no longer requires that, Barton lamented, saying that educators in the 1920s stopped looking at people as individuals and started placing everyone into groups. The result, he said, is that today white Christians such as himself have fewer rights than everyone else (Ironically, it was U.S. immigration policy before 1965 that placed immigrants into groups, prioritizing western and northern Europeans over others.)

“Every item in the Bill of Rights is given to every individual, it’s not given to groups,” he said. “But today, the Supreme Court says the purpose of the Bill of Rights is to protect the minority from the majority. Now how stupid is that? Because I’m in the majority as a white guy, do I not get the right to a trial by jury, do I not get the right to free speech? No, because I’m in the wrong group. And so, what happens is even back in 1992, in a Supreme Court case I was involved with, the court at the time created classes of religions and if you’re in Christianity, that’s the biggest religion so we give you the least protection. But if your’e in a small religion, we’ll give you more protection than anyone else.”

W. F. Price #sexist web.archive.org

I saw a news story the other day asking why men were getting most of the jobs in the economic recovery, which has been slow and meager in any event. Evidently, when men no longer have significantly higher unemployment than women, it is a national tragedy. Throughout the recession, and even today, men have had higher unemployment, but now they have reached near parity with women.

The culprit? According to Daily Kos, public sector layoffs. Due to decreases in public revenue, government had little choice but to cut these positions to avoid default. The lower public revenue was a direct result of men’s inability to pay tax, which goes to show that women, even when working, rely heavily on men. This brings up the question of why, when men were disproportionately suffering in the recession, feminists were crowing about their supremacy and men’s misfortune. There can only be a few answers to this:

Ingratitude

When men support women in any way, rather than appreciate it, feminists tend to feel this support is a privilege they deserve simply for being women. We often call this the “entitlement mentality.” This sense of entitlement, however, is rarely paired with any efforts to make it convenient for men to support women, or any reciprocity whatsoever.

Hatred and lack of empathy

Seeing men suffer seems to give a great number of feminists pleasure. They write articles about how pathetic men are, proclaim themselves more “evolved” and better suited to the modern world, and generally abuse the unfortunate — when they are men. However, when the tables turn ever so slightly, immediately one can hear wailing, tales of woe and proclamations of victimhood.

Short-sighted stupidity

You’d think that feminists would take a look at the reality of the situation, wherein the huge majority of the funds directed their way are a result of wealth creation, an overwhelmingly male endeavor. From Norm Brinker’s founding of the Susan G. Komen breast cancer foundation to the millions of men slaving away as private sector workers and businessmen to pay taxes, the money feminists feel they are entitled to comes from men far more often than not. However, rather than try to preserve and foster that income stream, they do everything in their power to destroy it by denying men opportunities, kicking them when they are down, refusing to give them any breaks, demanding they be handicapped in schools, the workplace and business, etc.

The reaction to the mancession and recovery proves feminists to be moral cretins with a third-rate understanding of consequences and the most basic economic principles. If anything should entirely discredit them, this ugly reaction to national hardship is it. Not only are they incapable of sound judgment and bereft of decency, they cannot even take the necessary steps to take care of themselves.

So why, again, do feminists have any authority in any institution at all? Their net effect is damaging, not only to men but to themselves and decent women as well. It’s time to put a stop to the pandering, and to deal with feminists as the dysfunctional, self-destructive borderline cases they are.

Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis #fundie hineni.org

There are so many tragedies befalling us nowadays that it's difficult to keep pace - terrorism in Israel, escalation throughout the world, and now, we have an added tsora - Mordechai Vanunu. For those of you who may not be familiar with the case, Vanunu is a traitor who sold secrets about Israel's nuclear capacity to British newspapers, and now, after eighteen years of imprisonment, he was released spewing forth hatred of his own people and country.

How does such a thing happen? How does a Jew, a citizen of the State of Israel, become a turncoat? How does he betray his own people?

[...]

So what happened to Mordechai Vanunu's Jewish heart? What happened to his Yiddishe neshama? How can a Jew live in Eretz Yisrael, breathe in the air of the Holy Land, behold the return of his brethren from the four corners of the earth, witness the miracle of the beginning of our redemption, and still perpetrate such evil? And perhaps even more perplexing - how could Israel Intelligence, vaunted for its competence and know-how, have allowed Vanunu to be placed in such a sensitive position?

[...]

Israel's intelligence messed up because sadly, those tell-tale signs had little meaning to them. Way before the exposure of his perfidious deed, Vanunu converted to Christianity, participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, became a nude artist's model, and joined the Communist Party. Each of these acts should have set off alarm bells, for each is a betrayal of everything that we, the Jewish people cherish and hold dear. To Israelis of secular and leftist persuasion however, such activities are of no concern. They reflect a "liberal, egalitarian" attitude that has become politically correct, and alas, is espoused by far too many. And herein lies the crux of the problem, and herein are to be found the answers to our questions.

An entire generation of Israelis has been raised as citizens of the world rather than as Jews whose hearts throb with the voice of Torah and the faith of our ancestors. They do not recognize the Divine Covenant that bequeathed this land to us as an eternal inheritance. They do not feel the blood of the prophets coursing through their veins. They do not see themselves as links to Sinai. Vanunu and his ilk have no use for the Covenant. Vanunu scoffs at our Torah ideals. He asserts that Jews do not need a state - they can live anywhere in the world. But should they insist on living in Israel, let them do so under Palestinian rule.

I have encountered Vanunus everywhere - Jewish self-haters who grew up without knowing who they are - Jews who were never awakened by the voice from Sinai; Jews who have expertise in every field, but remain Torah illiterates; Jews who drift aimlessly, dabble in every cause, embrace the idols of other nations and remain blind and deaf to the majestic call of their own people. While such Jews (wherever they may be) diminish our people, in Israel, they jeopardize the very existence of the State.