Similar posts

Mencius Moldbug #fundie unqualified-reservations.blogspot.de

(Extract from A gentle introduction to Unqualified Reservations (part 1))

The triangle of professors, bureaucrats, and public opinion is stable, because the professors teach as well as advise. Of course, there is a time lag. The system experiences some strain. But it will stay together, so long as the polarity does not randomly reverse - ie, because Cthulhu decides to suddenly swim right rather than left.

But no. Cthulhu may swim slowly. But he only swims left. Isn't that interesting?

In the history of American democracy, if you take the mainstream political position (Overton Window, if you care) at time T1, and place it on the map at a later time T2, T1 is always way to the right, near the fringe or outside it. So, for instance, if you take the average segregationist voter of 1963 and let him vote in the 2008 election, he will be way out on the wacky right wing. Cthulhu has passed him by.

Where is the John Birch Society, now? What about the NAACP? Cthulhu swims left, and left, and left. There are a few brief periods of true reaction in American history - the post-Reconstruction era or Redemption, the Return to Normalcy of Harding, and a couple of others. But they are unusual and feeble compared to the great leftward shift. Nor, most important for our hypothesis, did they come from the universities; in the 20th century, periods of reaction are always periods of anti-university activity. (McCarthyism is especially noticeable as such. And you'll note that McCarthy didn't exactly win.)

The principle applies even in wars. In each of the following conflicts in Anglo-American history, you see a victory of left over right: the English Civil War, the so-called "Glorious Revolution," the American Revolution, the American Civil War, World War I, and World War II. Clearly, if you want to be on the winning team, you want to start on the left side of the field.

And we are starting to piece the puzzle together. The leftward direction is, itself, the principle of organization. In a two-party democratic system, with Whigs and Tories, Democrats and Republicans, etc, the intelligentsia is always Whig. Their party is simply the party of those who want to get ahead. It is the party of celebrities, the ultra-rich, the great and good, the flexible of conscience. Tories are always misfits, losers, or just plain stupid - sometimes all three.

And the left is the party of the educational organs, at whose head is the press and universities. This is our 20th-century version of the established church. Here at UR, we sometimes call it the Cathedral - although it is essential to note that, unlike an ordinary organization, it has no central administrator. No, this will not make it easier to deal with.

This strange chiral asymmetry implies some fundamental difference between right and left. What is that difference? What does it even mean to be left rather than right? How can an entire system of independent thinkers and institutions, without any central coordinating agency, recognize that everyone should go left rather than right?

FrostyB #fundie steamcommunity.com

???? ?????????????????? ??????????????????

To set some standards straight, before you read:
If you're ever so willing to read a Manifesto, please do read with an open-mind as the close-minded would see through the conveying message of the Manifesto.
Also yes, I am quite serious when I say I'm a Neo-Fascist, I'm politically active and bloody proud:

I was once a "Democratic-Socialist" in my early stages when I was learning about politics, because I was influenced by the nice sounding words "equality", "diversity" and "acceptance".
My friends, my teachers, even the media spoke greatly of the Left-Wing and how everyone has "human rights" and also how it is religiously affiliated as a just and moral cause to help your fellow human being.
I loved everything about the Left-Wing at the time, it sounded so right, so justifiable to fight for us all to unite as one equally same human being, sharing our own customs and traditions amongst foreign men in the country I loved dearly.
Well, that was until I started opening my eyes to the Left-Wings destructive nature.
It all started with the 2014 Sydney hostage crisis, it shocked everyone in Australia and the world.
I was shocked and surprised that it was done by a Muslim, and so, after school, I went home to research more about Islam, the further I dug I came to read online that Islam was a violent cult.
I was often told that Islam was a religion of peace so this left me very confused, the next day I confronted my Muslim friend about the violent quotes in the Quran I read online, to which he responded "They're lying, it's not in the Quran, they take it out of context", and so the next week as I was further driven by curiosity I borrowed the English version of the Quran from my local library to see if it was true what the so-called "Nazis" said online about Islam.
To my surprise, it was true, the standard version of the Quran was indeed true to holding many violent phrases against the "Infidels".
I felt betrayed, my Muslim friend and the teachers lied to me about Islam, to then they've lost my trust that they are teaching us accurate information, so I started questioning everything they've taught me thus far and started researching everything learning more deeply in its roots to see if it is at all accurate.
I became even more curious the more deeper I researched and started questioning the morals of "equality" and even the technical tenets of the Left-Wing, as curiosity led me to only more questions about everything I've learnt about Religion, Diversity, Equality and the so called "good and just" cause of the Left-Wing.
To everything I thought was morally right, correct and good in its practise, bad and evil I found myself to be very wrong.
Throughout all my research, I have concluded to find myself to be in total disbelief, I was in shock, I felt total agony to my discovery that me, my friends, my family and the fellow European brothers of descent that we were indeed living in a political dystopia, as it is true.
The more I thought about it, the more it became clear to me of what I thought reality once was, is now collapsing into what I know as the very real reality, it left me completely stunned.
I was shattered, morally, religiously, and politically.
To my conclusions, learning that by human nature and its principles, we are indeed not equal nor the same at all.
We are all different for a reason, as I am now convinced religiously and politically, we are not infact equal at all, but unique.
By keeping our Customs, Traditions, Ethics & Ethnics separate, we are playing by basic human nature, as it was always intended to be.
By nature, I am also talking religiously by Gods and God them self that we were always meant to be a unique blossom of different cultures and customs in its purest form, like a unique colour in the Rainbow.
As for example, when you combine all the colours together, it creates a disgusting brown darkish colour, it creates a mess.
The same with different cultures, as by natures fundamentals it is proven that different cultures do not mingle, but collide.
As such as the animals that we are, you never see the bear befriending the fish.
Nor see the Rhino mate with the Elephant, it was never intended to be, it doesn't work by nature.
Race mix is simply a form of destruction, a form of impurity, like a detached link from your ancestors blood and from the soil on which you live on.
By Left-Wing nature, in its true form and purpose is a self-destructive political monster of corruption that favours imaginative thoughts over realpolitikal action which goes against the very statically set principles of human nature to which they call "progressive Globalism", which is infact regressive and dangerous in its true form, created to trick the light-minded, the vulnerable and gullible people who is politically active into voting for disaster profiteers.
Alike Democracy as I've learnt, people are tricked into voting for the dangerous, destructive and corrupt Left-Wing and other regressive parties.
To which also in its other form on the Right-Wing such as Centre-Right like Liberalism are no better than the Left-Wing as it is a different form of Leftism "Globalism" but for the Right-Wing, in which Liberalism populates and fundamentally favours bigot groups for those who don't think regressively and to punish those who dare to think differently from the fundamental tenets of Leftism/Liberalism like the groups that are born from a Liberal democracy such as Antfia, "Anti-Fascist", and other fantastical anti-fundamentalist groups like LGBT where there is more than 2 genders or even Black Lives Matter where the foreign man deserves superior living conditions to the Native White European man in his very own country for all the supposed "evils" our White ancestors have done in the past that have created the great Western world we have today.
In all of this further proving what I believe in and why I do, we need to remove the dangerous Left-Wing and Democracy itself, it favours a false idea of freedom which ultimately leads to the destructive nature of Leftist and Liberal agenda's as such for example bringing the foreign man first before the Native people, as well as giving a false sense of equality that hides the destructive nature of democracy.
The Western world needs Social order more than ever, we need an authoritarian system that would lead us beyond the Left-Right spectrum of politics, a leader, a hero, for those to look up to, to inspire and to install within the people the values of the Western man, the ideal citizen body who rules with an Iron grip, who would light the way for the future generations of our great Western Nations to her survival and for those of descent to look back at our great unique history with pride and glamour to say I am proud to be a White Native European of descent, of this blood, of this soil that we share with one custom, one culture, one tribe, in this great Nation of ours where security is strong, where we are safe and where we live and prosper in this Utopia amongst fellow Western men of the same descent, we are free, we are safe, long live the West, long live Europe, we belong here, this is our country, this is our people of whom share the same blood, we are of the Western world, of European blood, we are Australian and this is what equal is!
Do your research before you are quick to judge and never be afraid to think independently from others, I'd rather die knowing I was living the truth about politics and its nature rather than to live my whole life believing in a lie just because the Media, my teachers, and my friends says its true, don't be fooled!

Africa for Africans!
Asia for Asians!
Europe for Europeans!
Dogs for dogs and cats for cats!
This is natures rule, and it will stay that way forever.
Religious or not, this is the intentions!
This is the correct and true European way of life, through one cultural unification, through order, and by blood and soil.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

The establishment clique is still in shock over Trump winning

They're furious, desperate and completely baffled. They haven't gotten over it. They can't understand how the power slipped out of their hands. They're boiling over with feelings of anger and desire for vengeance. They see Trump as a pretender who stole the power that was rightfully theirs forever. They had the votes locked and political positions secured for eternity, or that's what they thought. They believed they had the perfect, two-party machine with repeating dem and rep strokes grinding out power and wealth for them forever.

Then came Trump who broke the two-party machine and wrested the control out of their hands. Now they're in shock. All their dirty secrets like the Bohemian grove, kiddie sex slave rings, and trillions of stolen dollars are known to Trump and they don't know how he's going to use that information. I'm sure they've used all means at their disposal to convince Trump not to do anything. Bribes, threats and backstabbing media attacks. Nothing's working. The Trump Train is still going strong.

However, Trump needs people to watch his six. To uncover and battle fake news, stop all attempts to bury important information like pizzagate, and stay strong. The clique is coming after us, too. They are posting here all the time about how "Trump's lost it", "Trump's desperate", "Trump's looking weak" and so on. Don't believe any of it! It's an illusion, not reality. USA has NEVER had as strong and righteous president as we have now!

Nathan Larson #sexist red-pill-libertarian.com

Enslavement is not that radical of an idea

Slavery is actually not all that radical of an idea. Already, both men and women are enslaved till they reach the age of 18. They have to do whatever chores their parents order them to do, and they can be spanked or otherwise disciplined for disobeying. They are subject to compulsory schooling and can be thrown into detention or juvenile hall if they resist. They also are not allowed to vote, even though they pay taxes (sales taxes when they spend their allowance, and income taxes when they turn 16 and start working). The average voter probably supports all this.

Red pillers favor extending the enslavement of women beyond age 18, under the theory that, especially during some of women's most important years (ages 15-30), they are usually not able to make decisions that are as wise as what their fathers could make for them. In countries like India where arranged marriages are the norm, it does seem like there's a higher marital success rate.

Bear in mind, the term "enslavement" tends to be used very broadly by libertarians, to cover everything from conscription to jury duty. Mainstream society, and the Supreme Court, obviously don't consider that kind of mandatory service enslavement, or it would have been struck down as a 13th Amendment violation.

My point in saying that it's not that radical of an idea, is that it's an idea that by now we have plenty of experience applying in the real world and seeing how it works. One disadvantage that libertarianism often has is that it proposes ideas that have never been tried, and therefore people will say, for example, "Show me one place in the world where anarcho-capitalism has worked."

Objections

"Ah, the moral relativism dodge."

That wasn't the way I intended it. Part of my point was that slavery of children has been tried before, so it's a practice that we have some empirical evidence about. One of the problems with a lot of libertarian ideas, such as anarcho-capitalism, is that there's little empirical evidence about how it would work, so people will say, "Show me one place on earth where a society without a state has flourished" and use that as a reason why we can't try it. The subjugation of women to men has also been tried extensively throughout history, so we know a lot about the consequences of it. It wouldn't be an untried social experiment; to the contrary, feminism is the relatively new social experiment, and we're just now starting to get some evidence of the results (e.g. falling fertility rates, diminished levels of female happiness, rising suicide rates among menopausal women, etc.)

The other aspect of enslavement of women is that it is very similar to practices the voters already approve (e.g. the enslavement of children). As a pragmatic political realist who is always mindful of what the voters will be receptive to, I have to take that into account.

"Libertarians generally oppose most of the child indentured servitude bullet points you listed above"

I'm not so sure about that. One of the rationales for why I'm being kicked out of the LPVA is that they say I don't respect the fact that children can't give informed consent (e.g. to sex). The idea that children can't give informed consent is one of the main arguments for enslaving them. Apparently, the LPVA does believe children are incompetent to exercise their rights of self-ownership. If they don't own themselves, then someone else owns them (at least temporarily), which is the very definition of slavery.

If we can justify taking away rights from kids on the basis of their being less competent than their parents or other guardians, then why not take away rights from women on the basis of their being less competent than their fathers and husbands, if that can be proven? The theoretical foundation having been laid, and agreed on by Libertarians at least with regard to children, all that is left is to gather the empirical proof.

"This anti-woman philosophy masquerading as a strand of libertarianism would only exacerbate that problem. As a Libertarian activist who wants our candidates to do well and get elected, I don’t want libertarianism associated with a philosophy that alienates half the voters."

I'm antifeminist, not anti-woman. There are female antifeminists as well, such as Ann Coulter and Christy0Misty, who have said that women's right to vote should be taken away. Mises (in Socialism) and Rothbard (in Power and Market) too made suggestions along those lines.

"As a single heterosexual man, I would prefer to date libertarians rather than statists, so I don’t want libertarianism associated with a philosophy that repels women by casting them as mindless slaves."

You seem to be presuming that (1) equality of women to men is a libertarian view, (2) the idea of enslavement of women to men repels all women, and (3) it's preferable to date libertarians rather than statists. Actually, I think it's often best to have a romantic relationship with women who are apolitical. Thus far, I haven't observed libertarian women to have a very good track record of loyalty; most of them seem to end up divorcing at least one husband.

Sematrix #racist reddit.com

Yes it was. By Zionists and their corrupt, collaborator Arab accomplices like the House of Saud.

It's amusing how you fake-lefties in bed with fascist Jews, and no doubt profiteering from the Zionist crony state rackets, pretend to be the champions of their Arab, Muslim, and Christian victims. You're "humanitarianism" is unconvincing, especially since we know the fascist essence of the Israelis who are killing average Arabs, Muslims and Christians in Palestine and beyond by the droves, with the Diaspora Zionist fifth column you're shilling for helping them do it. But you claim documentation of fascist Jews is conspiracy theory.

The seminal characteristics of Zionist and their thug and scum left-right accomplices is that they're insane moral frauds and insatiable greedy reprobates who believe their own lies because the crony state money is so good.

So you're so deluded and morally insane that you actually have the chutzpah to declare critics of fascist Israel, it's fifth columns, and their bought off accomplices anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists who believe "a secret cabal of Jews" rules the world. No. I believe an open conspiracy of fascist Jews and Zionists and their left-right accomplices are engaged in blatant fascism, and I and many others have documented that fact.

But obvious Zionist partisans such as yourself have no incentive to notice that fascism, and every incentive to lie through your blood-drenched teeth.

micropenis29 #fundie incels.co

(Based) Fascism is NOT on the right side of the political spectrum

Foids love governments. The bigger the government, the more ways there are for incel money to get funneled to single-mom foids for various purposes. After all, someone has to pay for birth control, abortions, Chad and Tyrone's abandoned babies, etc. and the way foids see it, that someone might as well be incels.

Fascism is a left-wing ideology. Communism is also a left-wing ideology. Both are on the far left-end of the political ideological spectrum. Both make the government really, really fucking huge. Hence, foids adore these ideologies.

As we all know, foids are great liars. This is especially true when it comes to politics. Foids try to disguise their authoritarianism by framing fascism as a right-wing ideology. This allows them to smear real right-wing ideologies such as anarcho-capitalism, classical liberalism and libertarianism by wrongfully claiming that they're "closer on the spectrum to fascism" than socialism is.

This illusory false-dichotomy results in people rejecting all right-wing ideologies in favor of socialism, since "teehee everything to the right of socialism is the road to fascism you Nazis!"

Just remember, the real political spectrum looks like this:
image

Mencius Moldbug #fundie unqualified-reservations.blogspot.de

(Extract from A gentle introduction to Unqualified Reservations (part 1))

First, we need to define left and right. In my opinion, obviously a controversial one, the explanation for this mysterious asymmetric dimension is easy: it is political entropy. Right represents peace, order and security; left represents war, anarchy and crime.

Because values are inherently subjective, it is possible to argue that left can be good and right can be bad. For example, you can say that the Civil War was good - the North needed to conquer the South and free the slaves.

On the other hand, it is also quite easy to construct a very clean value system in which order is simply good, and chaos is simply evil. I have chosen this path. It leaves quite a capacious cavity in the back of my skull, and allows me to call myself a reactionary. To you, perhaps, it is the dark side. But this is only because the treatment is not yet complete.

Whatever you make of the left-right axis, you have to admit that there exists some force which has been pulling the Anglo-American political system leftward for at least the last three centuries. Whatever this unfathomable stellar emanation may be, it has gotten us from the Stuarts to Barack Obama. Personally, I would like a refund. But that's just me.

It is time to understand this force. My theory is that what we're looking at is the attraction of power itself. The left attracts a natural coalition because it always attracts those whose only interest is in the pure thrill of domination. Most will join them through peer pressure alone, leaving only the misfits.

Let's look, for a minute, at the minds of the people who hold these positions of power. Your R1 professors, your Times reporters, and so on. These are, of course, very competitive jobs, and only a tiny minority of the people who want them and are capable of doing them will get to have them. They have certainly worked very hard to get where they are. And they perceive that effort as one made in the interest of humanity at large.

I think the salaries at this level are reasonable, but it is not money that makes people want these jobs. It is power, which brings with it status. I define power as personal influence over important events; I don't know of any other definition.

One of the key reasons that intellectuals are fascinated by disorder, in my opinion, is the fact that disorder is an extreme case of complexity. And as you make the structure of authority in an organization more complex, more informal, or both - as you fragment it, eliminating hierarchical execution structures under which one individual decides and is responsible for the result, and replacing them with highly fragmented, highly consensual, and highly process-oriented structures in which ten, twenty or a hundred people can truthfully claim to have contributed to the outcome, you increase the amount of power, status, patronage, and employment produced.

Of course, you also make the organization less efficient and effective, and you make working in it a lot less fun for everyone - you have gone from startup to Dilbert. This is Brezhnevian sclerosis, the fatal disease of organizations in a highly regulated environment. All work is guided by some systematic process, in which each rule was contributed by someone whose importance was a function of how many rules he added. In the future, we will all work for the government. Individually, this is the last thing your average intellectual wants to do, but it is the direction in which his collective acts are pushing us.

In short: intellectuals cluster to the left, generally adopting as a social norm the principle of pas d'ennemis a gauche, pas d'amis a droit, because like everyone else they are drawn to power. The left is chaos and anarchy, and the more anarchy you have, the more power there is to go around. The more orderly a system is, the fewer people get to issue orders. The same asymmetry is why corporations and the military, whose system of hierarchical executive authority is inherently orderly, cluster to the right.

Once the cluster exists, however, it works by any means necessary. The reverence of anarchy is a mindset in which an essentially Machiavellian, tribal model of power flourishes. To the bishops of the Cathedral, anything that strengthens their influence is a good thing, and vice versa. The analysis is completely reflexive, far below the conscious level. Consider this comparison of the coverage between the regime of Pinochet and that of Castro. Despite atrocities that are comparable at most - not to mention a much better record in providing responsible and effective government - Pinochet receives the full-out two-minute hate, whereas the treatment of Castro tends to have, at most, a gentle and wistful disapproval.

This is because Pinochet's regime was something completely alien to the American intellectual, whereas - the relationship between Puritan divines and Bolshevism being exactly as the mad Arab, Abdul Alhazred, says - Castro's regime was something much more understandable. If you sketch the relative weights of the social networks connecting Pinochet to the Cathedral, versus Castro to the Cathedral, you are comparing a thread to a bicep.

lbryce #fundie freerepublic.com

So, what exactly do the voters, constituencies, gain with this two-party system? Isn't the opposing party supposed to, uh, oppose? Where one supposedly committed to resisting the very tide in which the social malaise continues to grow, feed off the decadence, effluence from the overflowing sewage that is the liberal left-wing way of life as harbinger to the end of society as we know it. Hey, I've got two words to say in reaction to these Republican Party poopers.
Game Over.

“Let freedom ring,” Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the bill’s chief sponsor, said shortly before the vote.

Let Freedom Ring? Let Freedom Ring??

What sort of freedom is that?. The freedom to violate every societal norm, the freedom to commit all sorts of depravity, freedom to co-opt, corrupt the natural way of things. The freedom to indulge in lascivious behavior and worse...

If these people are celebrating freedom, the rest of us will never be free.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

At its core, the left-right divide all comes down to the most basic principles.

Left = Plato. Anti-Christian. Anti-family. Imperialist.
Right = Aristotle. Christian. Pro-family. Nationalist.

This heuristic will allow you to quickly and easily categorize any ideology correctly and cut your way through even the most determined fog of nebulous redefinitions attempting to ideologically mischaracterize a person, a party, or a movement.

Anyone who is against Christianity is necessarily against the West, also known as Christendom. Remember that the concept of ideology is, in itself, an intrinsically Western concept.

UPDATE: based on my personal observations, you could reasonably add a fifth element to the heuristic.

Left = Redefinitions, complications, explanations, interpretations, penumbras, emanations, and appeals to authority, credentials, and the sacred spirit of Science.
Right = Truth

Paul S #fundie ttlg.com

I've often imagined a Puritan utopia if there were no separation, and the church was our state.
Our two-party system could become the Catholics and the Protestants who could impose laws not unlike the following:
Performing or receiving an abortion would be a capital offense with no exceptions, while prayer in public schools would be mandatory, and intelligent design would be taught as a science. Gay marriage would never be uttered, and being actively gay in itself would be a crime. Possessing a copy of Playboy would be the equivalent to a minor drug offense, whereas owning hardcore pornography would be in line with heroin possession, and R-rated movies would be a thing of the past. Premarital sex and cohabitation of unmarried couples would be unlawful. A governmental agency called the SEA (Sexual Enforcement Agency) could be created to assure that the strict new laws of the bedroom and entertainment industry be enforced. The two parties could debate Biblical implications when setting policies on issues such as birth control and appropriate dress for women, as well as which books and music CDs should be burned.
Now my question to all the devout Christians who would love this hypothetical scenario is: what would be the result? Would hurricanes and earthquakes end? Would our summers be filled with days that are perfectly sunny and 74 degrees, with gentle evening rains? Would our hospitals empty because our nation's people would be blessed with nothing but great health? Would the economy flourish with a 100% living wage employment rate? Would criminals simply lose the urge to break the law?
I have heard that gays and feminists caused tragedies like September 11th, and Hurricane Katrina. But, what would happen if our nation fully and completely adhered to God's Laws?
I'd like to know.

Dr_Jawa #fundie reddit.com

[Question asked is "Can I own slaves in Anarcho-Capitalism?"]

"If the "slave" decides to walk away, you think you have a "right" to use force to keep him?"

They sold away their right (In the legal sense of the term) to exit, thus giving the owner cause for damages if they violate that agreement.

"you think you have a "right" to use force to keep him?"

The whole point of private property is that you can use force to defend your ownership of it

ChargeUpTheRotors #fundie reddit.com

[OP of "Hi! I'm you're new moderator. A brief introduction."]

I've always had a deep-seated hatred towards left-wing ideologies, even when young and politically uncultured -- I've always been a rightist at heart, perhaps it is in my blood. After all, my father left communist-occupied Poland when he was in his 20s, views Reagan as a good man, and voted for Trump, unlike the corporate-communist Armenian that ideologically controls this website and tells us immigrants all hate white people and we must bend to their new world order.

While many here are Anarcho-Capitalists -- an ideology I disagree with, but one that I like, and I am indeed a fan of the Austrian school despite viewing them as a bit lacking in social and cultural issues. I can be best described as far-right and a bit "alt-right"ish.

Rest assured, though I am a race-realist, there will be no gas chambers for the likes of Rothbard or Mises. Only cigars and their perfume to mask the scent of spent helicopter fuel.

Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.; various Randroids #racist mises.org

Open Borders Are an Assault on Private Property

Whether we’re talking about illegal immigration from Mexico and Central America, or birthright citizenship, or the migrants coming from the Middle East and Africa, the subject of immigration has been in the news and widely discussed for months now. It is an issue fraught with potentially perilous consequences, so it is especially important for libertarians to understand it correctly.

This Mises Circle, which is devoted to a consideration of where we ought to go from here, seems like an opportune moment to take up this momentous question.

I should note at the outset that in searching for the correct answer to this vexing problem I do not seek to claim originality. To the contrary, I draw much of what follows from two of the people whose work is indispensable to a proper understanding of the free society: Murray N. Rothbard and Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

Some libertarians have assumed that the correct libertarian position on immigration must be “open borders,” or the completely unrestricted movement of people. Superficially, this appears correct: surely we believe in letting people go wherever they like!

But hold on a minute. Think about “freedom of speech,” another principle people associate with libertarians. Do we really believe in freedom of speech as an abstract principle? That would mean I have the right to yell all during a movie, or the right to disrupt a Church service, or the right to enter your home and shout obscenities at you.

What we believe in are private property rights. No one has “freedom of speech” on my property, since I set the rules, and in the last resort I can expel someone. He can say whatever he likes on his own property, and on the property of anyone who cares to listen to him, but not on mine.

The same principle holds for freedom of movement. Libertarians do not believe in any such principle in the abstract. I do not have the right to wander into your house, or into your gated community, or into Disneyworld, or onto your private beach, or onto Jay-Z’s private island. As with “freedom of speech,” private property is the relevant factor here. I can move onto any property I myself own or whose owner wishes to have me. I cannot simply go wherever I like.

Now if all the parcels of land in the whole world were privately owned, the solution to the so-called immigration problem would be evident. In fact, it might be more accurate to say that there would be no immigration problem in the first place. Everyone moving somewhere new would have to have the consent of the owner of that place.

When the state and its so-called public property enter the picture, though, things become murky, and it takes extra effort to uncover the proper libertarian position. I’d like to try to do that today.

Shortly before his death, Murray Rothbard published an article called “Nations by Consent: Decomposing the Nation State.” He had begun rethinking the assumption that libertarianism committed us to open borders.

He noted, for instance, the large number of ethnic Russians whom Stalin settled in Estonia. This was not done so that Baltic people could enjoy the fruits of diversity. It never is. It was done in an attempt to destroy an existing culture, and in the process to make a people more docile and less likely to cause problems for the Soviet empire.

Murray wondered: does libertarianism require me to support this, much less to celebrate it? Or might there be more to the immigration question after all?

And here Murray posed the problem just as I have: in a fully private-property society, people would have to be invited onto whatever property they traveled through or settled on.

If every piece of land in a country were owned by some person, group, or corporation, this would mean that no person could enter unless invited to enter and allowed to rent or purchase property. A totally privatized country would be as closed as the particular property owners desire. It seems clear, then, that the regime of open borders that exists de facto in the U.S. and Western Europe really amounts to a compulsory opening by the central state, the state in charge of all streets and public land areas, and does not genuinely reflect the wishes of the proprietors.

In the current situation, on the other hand, immigrants have access to public roads, public transportation, public buildings, and so on. Combine this with the state’s other curtailments of private property rights, and the result is artificial demographic shifts that would not occur in a free market. Property owners are forced to associate and do business with individuals they might otherwise avoid.

“Commercial property owners such as stores, hotels, and restaurants are no longer free to exclude or restrict access as they see fit,” writes Hans. “Employers can no longer hire or fire who they wish. In the housing market, landlords are no longer free to exclude unwanted tenants. Furthermore, restrictive covenants are compelled to accept members and actions in violation of their very own rules and regulations.”

Hans continues:

By admitting someone onto its territory, the state also permits this person to proceed on public roads and lands to every domestic resident’s doorsteps, to make use of all public facilities and services (such as hospitals and schools), and to access every commercial establishment, employment, and residential housing, protected by a multitude of nondiscrimination laws.

It is rather unfashionable to express concern for the rights of property owners, but whether the principle is popular or not, a transaction between two people should not occur unless both of those people want it to. This is the very core of libertarian principle.

In order to make sense of all this and reach the appropriate libertarian conclusion, we have to look more closely at what public property really is and who, if anyone, can be said to be its true owner. Hans has devoted some of his own work to precisely this question. There are two positions we must reject: that public property is owned by the government, or that public property is unowned, and is therefore comparable to land in the state of nature, before individual property titles to particular parcels of land have been established.

Certainly we cannot say public property is owned by the government, since government may not legitimately own anything. Government acquires its property by force, usually via the intermediary of taxation. A libertarian cannot accept that kind of property acquisition as morally legitimate, since it involves the initiation of force (the extraction of tax dollars) on innocent people. Hence government’s pretended property titles are illegitimate.

But neither can we say that public property is unowned. Property in the possession of a thief is not unowned, even if at the moment it does not happen to be held by the rightful owner. The same goes for so-called public property. It was purchased and developed by means of money seized from the taxpayers. They are the true owners.

(This, incidentally, was the correct way to approach de-socialization in the former communist regimes of eastern Europe. All those industries were the property of the people who had been looted to build them, and those people should have received shares in proportion to their contribution, to the extent it could have been determined.)

In an anarcho-capitalist world, with all property privately owned, “immigration” would be up to each individual property owner to decide. Right now, on the other hand, immigration decisions are made by a central authority, with the wishes of property owners completely disregarded. The correct way to proceed, therefore, is to decentralize decision-making on immigration to the lowest possible level, so that we approach ever more closely the proper libertarian position, in which individual property owners consent to the various movements of peoples.

Ralph Raico, our great libertarian historian, once wrote:

Free immigration would appear to be in a different category from other policy decisions, in that its consequences permanently and radically alter the very composition of the democratic political body that makes those decisions. In fact, the liberal order, where and to the degree that it exists, is the product of a highly complex cultural development. One wonders, for instance, what would become of the liberal society of Switzerland under a regime of “open borders.”

Switzerland is in fact an interesting example. Before the European Union got involved, the immigration policy of Switzerland approached the kind of system we are describing here. In Switzerland, localities decided on immigration, and immigrants or their employers had to pay to admit a prospective migrant. In this way, residents could better ensure that their communities would be populated by people who would add value and who would not stick them with the bill for a laundry list of “benefits.”

Obviously, in a pure open borders system, the Western welfare states would simply be overrun by foreigners seeking tax dollars. As libertarians, we should of course celebrate the demise of the welfare state. But to expect a sudden devotion to laissez faire to be the likely outcome of a collapse in the welfare state is to indulge in naïveté of an especially preposterous kind.

Can we conclude that an immigrant should be considered “invited” by the mere fact that he has been hired by an employer? No, says Hans, because the employer does not assume the full cost associated with his new employee. The employer partially externalizes the costs of that employee on the taxpaying public:

Equipped with a work permit, the immigrant is allowed to make free use of every public facility: roads, parks, hospitals, schools, and no landlord, businessman, or private associate is permitted to discriminate against him as regards housing, employment, accommodation, and association. That is, the immigrant comes invited with a substantial fringe benefits package paid for not (or only partially) by the immigrant employer (who allegedly has extended the invitation), but by other domestic proprietors as taxpayers who had no say in the invitation whatsoever.

These migrations, in short, are not market outcomes. They would not occur on a free market. What we are witnessing are examples of subsidized movement. Libertarians defending these mass migrations as if they were market phenomena are only helping to discredit and undermine the true free market.

Moreover, as Hans points out, the “free immigration” position is not analogous to free trade, as some libertarians have erroneously claimed. In the case of goods being traded from one place to another, there is always and necessarily a willing recipient. The same is not true for “free immigration.”

To be sure, it is fashionable in the US to laugh at words of caution about mass immigration. Why, people made predictions about previous waves of immigration, we’re told, and we all know those didn’t come true. Now for one thing, those waves were all followed by swift and substantial immigration reductions, during which time society adapted to these pre-welfare state population movements. There is virtually no prospect of any such reductions today. For another, it is a fallacy to claim that because some people incorrectly predicted a particular outcome at a particular time, therefore that outcome is impossible, and anyone issuing words of caution about it is a contemptible fool.

The fact is, politically enforced multiculturalism has an exceptionally poor track record. The twentieth century affords failure after predictable failure. Whether it’s Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union, or Pakistan and Bangladesh, or Malaysia and Singapore, or the countless places with ethnic and religious divides that have not yet been resolved to this day, the evidence suggests something rather different from the tale of universal brotherhood that is such a staple of leftist folklore.

No doubt some of the new arrivals will be perfectly decent people, despite the US government’s lack of interest in encouraging immigration among the skilled and capable. But some will not. The three great crime waves in US history – which began in 1850, 1900, and 1960 — coincided with periods of mass immigration.

Crime isn’t the only reason people may legitimately wish to resist mass immigration. If four million Americans showed up in Singapore, that country’s culture and society would be changed forever. And no, it is not true that libertarianism would in that case require the people of Singapore to shrug their shoulders and say it was nice having our society while it lasted but all good things must come to an end. No one in Singapore would want that outcome, and in a free society, they would actively prevent it.

In other words, it’s bad enough we have to be looted, spied on, and kicked around by the state. Should we also have to pay for the privilege of cultural destructionism, an outcome the vast majority of the state’s taxpaying subjects do not want and would actively prevent if they lived in a free society and were allowed to do so?

The very cultures that the incoming migrants are said to enrich us with could not have developed had they been constantly bombarded with waves of immigration by peoples of radically different cultures. So the multicultural argument doesn’t even make sense.

It is impossible to believe that the US or Europe will be a freer place after several more decades of uninterrupted mass immigration. Given the immigration patterns that the US and EU governments encourage, the long-term result will be to make the constituencies for continued government growth so large as to be practically unstoppable. Open-borders libertarians active at that time will scratch their heads and claim not to understand why their promotion of free markets is having so little success. Everybody else will know the answer.

F. Roger Devlin #fundie toqonline.com

[A review of "Third Ways" by Allan C. Carlson]

Adam Smith and David Ricardo expressed cautious optimism that an unhindered market in labor would provide the ordinary working man a large enough wage to marry and raise a few children; but neither claimed to have demonstrated the necessity of this. Radicals such as Marx and Engels soon challenged the idea, maintaining that capitalism transformed labor into an ordinary commodity which women and even children could sell to capitalists at a fraction of the cost for adult men. The traditional autonomy and solidarity of the family would thereby fall prey to industrial efficiency and the Faustian quest for profits. Later liberal economists such as J. S. Mill and Alfred Marshall came to agree with the Marxists that the capitalist market economy makes no natural accommodation to the family.

...

It might at first sight seem paradoxical that families could ever be economically worse off having a second income instead of just one. But this is a classic example of what logicians call the fallacy of composition. It works like this. When an exciting play occurs in a baseball game, all the fans jump to their feet to get a better view. Do they actually get a better view? On average, no. If only one fan were to rise, he would get a better view; but when all rise, the overall view is no better than before. Analogously, an individual woman entering the workforce undoubtedly improves her own material situation; but if the great mass of women enters the workforce, the overall effect is merely to glut the market for labor, driving down wages for everyone.

...

No “law of economics” prevents such insulation of women and children from the labor market. All societies treat certain things they especially value as extra commerciam—outside the scope of market exchange. There need be no market for beef, for example, in a country where cows are considered sacred. Or again, as long as a market in slaves existed they were subject to the same law of supply and demand as any other commodity; but this market could be abolished, and was. Similarly, there need be no market for women’s labor in a country which values home life and family solidarity more than maximal industrial efficiency. Except under rare conditions involving extreme destitution—e.g., where women’s or children’s wage work might be necessary to allow everyone in a family to eat adequately—any society can enjoy as much family autonomy as it is willing to pay for in such efficiency. Proponents of family-centered “third ways” believe such a tradeoff worthwhile; some may disagree, but there is no economic absurdity involved in the idea.

If you are even familiar with the term “family wage” today, you are showing your age. Yet this ideal, writes Carlson, “dominated labor goals throughout the North Atlantic region from the mid-nineteenth through mid-twentieth centuries and had measurable effects on wages and the labor market.” While industrialists almost without exception advocated the “right” of poor women to work (and drive down men’s wages), working class husbands felt differently. They fought for and won wages that permitted their women to remain at home with the children. In Britain between 1842 and 1914, for example, “substantial gains in material standards were achieved by the working class, accompanied by the movement of women from wage-earning to domestic pursuits.” Similarly, in Belgium there was “a thorough transformation in the family life of workers between 1853 and 1891, based on a withdrawal of married women from the labor market and a dramatic rise in the real incomes of men” (p. 44). Keep this in mind the next time you hear a feminist complacently assert the “impossibility” of returning to the days when a woman’s place was in the home.

In America the family wage ideal rested on legal barriers, direct discrimination (gasp!) against categories of female workers, marriage bans, and labor laws requiring the special treatment of women, discouraging their employment. The system was strong enough to survive the New Deal, but was dealt a body blow by the entry of the United States into World War II and the consequent mobilization of women for industry. The National War Production Board recommended “a single evaluation line for all jobs in a plant regardless whether performed by men or women.” Only 13 percent of US firms had followed such a policy in 1939, but by 1947, 57 percent did (pp. 45–46).

...

“Equal pay for equal work” is a masterful piece of political rhetoric with a sort of “2+2=4” ring to it. Carlson catalogues for us a few of the realities this deceptive slogan has served to conceal. First of all, family households with only a single male wage earner have experienced a decline in real income: between 1973 and 1993 alone, this decline amounted to 13.6 percent. Next, single-income families have been put at a mounting competitive disadvantage relative to two-income families in the acquisition of consumer goods. There has also been a sizeable increase in the number of men earning less than a “poverty line” wage, and similar growth in the number of children living in female-headed households. Married women are increasingly faced with a stark choice: leave their young children during the day to try to earn income, or stay with them and fall into poverty. Either way, the children lose (pp. 50–51).

For the first time in history, notes our author, the family is becoming completely industrialized. Gardening, food preparation, home repairs, child care, and other residual forms of home production are being abandoned by busy couples in favor of market-provided services; in other words, the home has no economy of its own, but has become at best a kind of consumer’s cooperative (pp. 51–52). With the economic rationale for marriage thus eroded, divorce, transitory cohabitation, bastardy, abortion, and loneliness all increase. We have come a long way, baby.

Sweden is often held up as the best model of a country pursuing a “third way” between capitalism and socialism. Carlson devotes a chapter to the evolution of Swedish family policy in the past century and the ideological debates surrounding it; rumor has it that its original title was “Desperate Swedish Socialist Housewives.” However that may be, this chapter makes especially clear the difficulty of arranging family policy prescriptions neatly on a conventional left-right ideological spectrum. As early as 1866, delegates to the First Socialist International “approved a resolution calling for bans on the employment of women. The measure’s sponsors reasoned that working women pressed down overall wage levels and displaced men; in their view, working women were the equivalent of strikebreakers” (p. 113). Sweden’s Social Democratic Party adopted this view, and for many years it remained normative for Swedish “progressives.”

...

By the 1960s, however, Alva Myrdal and her stridently anti-familial feminism were again on the march. Individual rather than familial taxation became a central issue in Swedish politics. As passage of the measure approached, a “Campaign for the Family” was launched. Fifty thousand letters of protest poured into the Prime Minister’s office; thousands of women marched on the Riksdag in (as one Swedish newspaper put it) “history’s first housewife demonstration.”

It was to no avail. In 1970, individual taxation went into effect; overnight, a housewife became an expensive luxury (pp. 129–31). Carlson writes: “Correctly labeled the era of Red Sweden, the first Olaf Palme government committed a kind of feminist genocide, intentionally eliminating a whole class of women through coerced ‘reeducation’ and forced labor” (p. 179).

The family wage is by nature a compromise with industrial capitalism; it turns one member of the family over to the labor market in exchange for keeping the rest insulated from it. Distributism, the economic platform advocated by Hilaire Belloc and G. K. Chesterton, went farther by seeking to counteract some of the inherent tendencies of capitalism directly.

Andrew Breitbart #fundie joemygod.blogspot.com

[On joining GOProud's board of directors.]

I am not endorsing gay marriage, I'm not endorsing Don't Ask, Don't Tell. I will be the harshest critic of the activist gay left, who I fear more than al-Qaida. But for these people not to exist in a two-party system, for you to tell them they're not welcome in the big tent, I have a huge problem with that and I'm going to indulge in my all '80s Depeche Mode, Cure, New Order fetish and we're going to have a big 'ol gay party at CPAC.

Mike King #sexist tomatobubble.com

For the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class), the neo-con propaganda outlet FOX News has, for the past 20 years or so, served the important purpose of keeping conservatives on a leash long enough to allow to them vent off their frustration, yet just short enough to keep them from wandering off into the land of total truth. The sole saving grace of the network was that, in allowing just enough cosmetic "conservatism" to air before millions of viewers, a percentage of the more astute elements of the massive audience would eventually wander off the plantation completely and join the ranks of the full truth "conspiracy theorists" TM. Indeed, during the late 1990's, your now fully enlightened Editor here passed through the FAUX News / Rush Limbaugh halfway-house before growing out of the "Left-Right" control cage altogether.

For that reason, in spite of our disdain for Rupert Murdoch's FAUX, we are nonetheless troubled by the recent and much-publicized rise of his de-balled sons (Lachlin & James) and their stupid and controlling communist wives (Sarah & Kathyrn). The scuttlebutt is that the contemptible, yet immensely popular, Bill O'Reilly was forced out by these beautiful women. O'Reilly's coveted 8 PM slot will be filled by Tucker Carlson, whose first guest as the new 8-PMer under the reign of the Bolshevik Bitches will be a man that O'Reilly once mocked -- the freakish trannie, Bruce Jenner (now referred to as "Caitlyn").

1. Kathryn made no effort to hide her love for Hillary and red-hot hatred for Trump & Bannon (She likes Ivanka though!)

2. Kathryn's "kinder, gentler" FOX will feature the degenerate freak Bruce Jenner.

Expect some of O'Reilly's elderly following to have heart attacks when Jenner appears with Carlson this coming Monday (April 24th)! But don't blame Carlson (who is actually not that bad) for having such a vile Satanic creature on his program. You can be sure that the Murdoch women, Kathryn in particular, are behind this obscenity. The Sisters-in-Law Murdoch had already previously amended the company's benefits package to include "expanded coverage for our transgender colleagues.”

Both Kathryn and Sarah are known to be "progressives." Of the two, Katryn (much like another silly little rich girl, Ivanka Trump) wields more power in her own right. She is a real fanatic when it comes to Trump-bashing, homosexuality, trannies and the Global Warming TM / Climate Change TM hoax. Since the Murdochs swallowed up National Geographic in 2015, that psuedo-scientific rag has continued to aggressively push the hoax while not allowing any real scientists to rebut the "settled science." The "philanthropist" Kathryn also worked for both the Clinton Climate Initiative and the Environmental Defense Fund. (here)

Old man Rupert once dismissed the Global Warming TM / Climate Change TM hoax as "alarmist nonsense." We expect this attitude at FOX News to "evolve" and eventually align with the views of the young Murdochs' National Geographic and Kathryn's beloved Environmental Defense Fund.

Now if you thought those National Geographic covers were bad, get a load of the EVIL boy-trannie child-abuse abomination that the next generation of the House of Murdoch recently put out. It's enough to almost make us want to plead with wretched old man Rupert Murdoch and that arrogant ass-clown Bill O'Reilly -- "Please, stay!"

Childhood psycho-sexual abuse --- coming soon to FOX's conservative audience.

The modern trend of men allowing their deranged women to rule over them is yet another symptom of the decay and decline of Western Civilization. Another high profile example of this alarming phenomenon is baby girl's Ivanka Trump-Kushner's uncontrolled White House antics -- such as her uninformed public support for the Global Warming TM / Climate Change TM hoax, "women's workplace issues," and her meeting with the baby butchers and baby body-part dealers of Planned Parenthood. Neither "The Donald" nor Ivanka's typically P-whipped Jewish husband, Jared Kushner, could reign in this spoiled little brat even if they wanted to.

And speaking of P-whipped, does it get any more pathetic than Pro Football Super Star and Trumpstein supporter, Tom Brady, failing to show up at the White House ceremony to honor the New England Patriots Super Bowl victory? You see, boys and girls, Brady's super-model wife, Giselle Bundchen, is an outspoken pro-abortionist, an anti-Trump tweeter, and a "Climate Change" TM libtard who is evidently embarrassed and fed-up with her husband's support for Trumpstein. We'll bet you dimes to doughnuts that the lovely Giselle put her high-heeled foot down and threatened to close down the candy store until pretty Tommy put an end to his public support for Trumpstein.

Your old-school Editor here at The Anti-New York Times has the utmost gentlemanly respect for the ladies. That respect does not extend to any "man" who allows a woman, no matter how blonde and beautiful, to de-ball and dictate to him. Unless and until men rediscover their balls and tell the Ivanka Trumps, the Giselle Bundchens, the Kathryn Murdochs and the Sarah Murdochs of our diseased and decaying society: "Shut up and sit down, you silly woman!" -- there will be no hope for the recovery of our collective sanity. Then again, in fairness to such men and in consideration of what our Marxist courts allow these wayward women to inflict upon husbands and fathers, many bullied men have no choice but to meekly accept the mischief of their wives -- or face alienation from their children.

Sick upside-down world!

Proverbs 21:19: Better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and angry woman.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times that the Murdoch sons and their wives are much more liberal than the old man.

Boobus Americanus 2: It would be nice if they overhaul FOX News and make it more objective. As it stands now, I can't stomach it.

Sugar: Hey Boobusss! Ya think your panssie-ass could stomach a ssubscription to the Anti-New York Times?

Editor: If Boobus can't even handle the watered-down half-truths of FAUX News, then he'd surely puke his guts up over the true stuff we put out.

mangoboy #sexist incels.co

It's the male instinct to have sex with as many women as possible, any way possible. Just because women don't want to have sex with me, doesn't mean I don't want to have sex with them. But you will never see me grab a woman's ass at the grocery store and start fucking her. There's laws against that which represses that instinct.

Yet, the female sexual instinct is not similarly repressed. Their instinct is to have sex with the most dominant/good looking/criminal males they can possibly find. That shouldn't be allowed. Queue some fat landwhale or effeminate numale telling me it's not comparable, because in the first instance I am violating someone's consent and therefore their rights but in the case of females, they are not violating anyone's rights because "muhh freedom of association". WRONG. Let's explain why:

So let's say at some point I get tired of paying taxes and I just stop completely. Most people(with the exception of anarcho-capitalists) would say that's a crime and that I should go to jail for it. But who am I really hurting by not paying my taxes? Not the government-they don't need my money, so there has to be another reason why people would want me thrown in jail. It's because people know that some portion of tax money goes to supporting infrastructure and the needs of people like healthcare, the police force, jobs, etc. So by not paying my taxes, I'm not hurting one particular person but society as a whole.

Similarly, the female is not hurting any one individual when she chases degenerate men like criminals and douchebags. Nor is she hurting any one individual when she chases highly attractive or powerful men, but society at large. When women are whores for evil men, they empower them and hurt good men by depriving them of much needed affection. Further, men will themselves seek to emulate evil behavior to be sexually successful, making the situation even worse. When they are whores for only attractive men, they skew the natural equilibrium. Eventually, there is an inflated sense of despair and resentment in society, not to mention degeneracy, and society itself will collapse.

anarchyinblack #fundie anarchyinblack.tumblr.com

OK I think It’s time to destroy Fedblr.

There can be no tolerance for communists or democrats in our Libertarian Right square.

I hereby therefore extend my invitation from freeblr to those members of toryblr that aren’t even slightly sympathetic to national socialism to join what I am calling the Hoppean Covenant.

The Hoppean Covenant is a club of anarcho-capitalists and feudal monarchists who are basically libertarian with a hard-on for the Holy Roman Empire.

Our motto is “The best form of government is an absolute sovereign. The optimal polity size is one.”

Mick Bynes #conspiracy mickbynes.blogspot.com

Hey... Look, I do not update this too much (whenever I do, it's stupid/silly bollocks you might not care about) and I have no time to maintain a blog (or anyone else's blog) at this time. Where are entries #1-8 you might be asking yourself? BALEETED! Fuck it! Meaningless to me and meaningless to most of you! I am going to be extremely careful about what I write down as well. I

Where should I begin? Ever searched up Mick Bynes on Google and got my Last.fm music profile? I don't check the shoutbox of it and I probably won't, because I know some people will say negative, hurtful and pessimistic things. I've read it all and seen it all. If you find the song "Mick Bynes is a Faggot" by Bitch Killer. I am honored by it, because it reminds me of Anal Cunt's song against Chris Barnes. Yes I am a faggot. I'll even call myself faggot for you all... yeah and I'm 10000% comfortable saying that! What does it mean to you? I'm simply a nice average person among the living (ooh good 'thrax album lol). There are people who have disgusting misconceptions and exaggerations about me. Will I get into this? No! I do not want to bore you to tears.

As for the people who recorded that... They don't know me, they will never know me, I did nothing to them, I'll never do anything to them and I want nothing to do with them. I stopped communicating with them over a couple of years ago, because they were cyberbullying me and someone else. So what gives? I honestly have nothing against them, since I didn't get to know them. I really don't want to know you if you're going to have a song against me for no reason. What gives you the right to attack me over something like my sexuality, my music, personal stuff, etc. It makes zero sense! For example... that's like me going against a person that's a fan of gas lamps and then I tell him "oh get with the times, I'm gonna write a song about you and how old you are!" These people try to take me down, but it only makes me stronger and stronger. All of their negative energy and vibes turn into positivity and optimism for me!

So what's new? Besides the fact that I am a metalhead and loving life... I am working with the CCHR to expose psychiatric abuse and how certain drugs (like Lexipro and Abilify) are controlling people. There's more to it. I have been so enlightened and educated this year, I am extremely amazed. I will live a life full of happiness, liberty and love. Trust me on this one!

If you seriously need to get a reach of me for whatever reason... I'm sure you have no reason to contact me since I'm not so important. If you want to contact (hey it's cool, I'm a nice sociable guy, I'll be more than happy to talk to you if you need me), you may go to my ReverbNation page. Don't have ReverbNation? Sign up for it and look up "Mick Bynes"... alright, I also have Facebook... simply search up Devin Palladino, add me, message me... I'll be happy to talk to you (as of now my privacy settings do not allow everybody to message me or add me as a friend, I do not know when I will lift these privacy settings). Just as long as you're not mean or stupid or whatever. Sadly a good amount of people on the Internet are like that. I can't stand those kinds of people. They're people with poisonous personalities.

In conclusion, I have a lot to live for. I'm a young person and I have the power to change this negative, pessimistic, miserable, depressing, etc. world and even universe. If you know who I truly am. Cool for you and you deserve my love. If not, oh well... too bad. You're being enslaved by money (I'm an anarcho-capitalist, but the money at the time this blog was written was not safe & sound money), religion, psychotropic drugs, propaganda, corruption, hypocrisy, lies, etc. I shall smite all of these horrible things! Oh trust me, I will. I will not stand for that. I am going to help fix this world & universe and do the best I can. Thank you for reading this.

ONE MORE THING.... before I conclude this lovely blog post... I have one highly important link for y'all:

Freedomain Radio

Originally I had two, but I feel this one link is just good enough. Stefan Molyneux rules! If you read he has a cult, it is quite untrue. I suggest you also join the forum. I am on there, that's a good way to get in touch with me.

I have a left my permanent marking here on the Internet, unless PIPA, SOPA or whatever they call it remove my page or Blogger.com shuts down for some odd reason... who knows! I am a freedom fighter. I stand for love, liberty, peace and prosperity! I will be one of the leaders in destroying the corruption, hypocrisy, dishonesty, negativity, religion, etc. No matter how long it takes! I am dedicated to helping out society and making sure society improves. We gotta weed out the oppression and other stuff. I can go on and on... however, I'll just end this blog right here. Arrivederci!

pizzlybear #fundie reddit.com

I'm also an anarcho-capitalist. I am white, so I feel that white interests should be considered. There are a number of explicit anti-white policies, like affirmative action, but most of my problems comes from the blatant hostility towards whites in general.

Not totally unrelated, but now to make a flagrant appeal to authority:

Murray Rothbard was a race realist. He believed that races exist and they differ on average, so social inequalities aren't a problem that require statist intervention. I believe Walter Block leans this way as well. The topic of race matters, we can't just ignore it by saying "we're all individuals."

[The problem I see with most pro-whites is they want a fascistic type of government to protect their white heritage...it shits in the face of freedom and liberty.]


You're problem is not with being "pro white," it's with racism and supremacism. There are just as many, probably more, blacks guilty of this.

I would add that I am very much pro black, I would hate for Europeans to flood into Africa and replace the natives. Just like I don't like the idea of forced immigration and integration, which results in a displacement of the indigenous Europeans (America is a little more tricky).

MajikFireHornet #racist seductivejewess.com

[Is there anything the average person can do to stop this takeover?]

First, get clear of the banking system. Keep only enough banked to pay short-term bills; for the rest, use cash NOT CREDIT and get any surplus you have into a negotiable metal like silver that you PHYSICALLY POSSESS. Second, since the Jews and their stooges have turned America’s economy into a top-down, debt-financed, bankster-monitized Ponzi scheme, prepare for System Collapse by stockpiling food, water, and other necessities. Third, since System Collapse will lead to Martial Law (cf. the trial run that the Regime just carried out in Boston) and urban-rural, Left-Right, and racial Civil War, WEAPON UP. I recommend the M1a (an AR is also fine) + a good sidearm, and also stockpile ammunition for your weapons of choice. Then hit the shooting range, learn to shoot accurately, and network with like-minded Patriots. Fourth, further educate yourself at relevant sites.

JohnnySalami #fundie incels.co

Incels should be ancaps

In an anarcho-capitalist society most of us would be long dead due to natural selection, which would be taking process uninhibited by the federal government. Those of us who wouldn’t be dead would have a decent chance to improve because many of us are not complete retards. HGH and T would be available like milk and eggs, we could buy women like slaves. Honestly ancapistan would be great for us

Brian Niemeier #fundie brianniemeier.com

[Context: Rich Johnson's Bleeding Cool is a website about comics]

In the midst of a recent Twitter debate with author Jon Del Arroz over the comic book industry's blacklisting of Conservative Christians, Bleeding Cool Head Writer Rich Johnston made himself the latest candidate for the Witch Test.

Once again, the pure element rejects those who consort with evil. The Witch Test continues batting a thousand.

To Rich's credit, he didn't turn tail and run like all the other failed test subjects--at least not permanently. He's come back to snipe at my Twitter mutuals every few hours in the course of the day I gave him to make that simple profession of faith in Christ Jesus. Yet he refuses to say the words.

Neither Rich, nor any other Death Cult camp follower, can unironically make a positive statement about Jesus because they're painfully aware of the social costs incurred by openly practicing Christianity.

Rich spent a great many words denying Jon's assertions that anti-Christian bias exists, but his actions speak far louder. No man can serve two masters, and he's chosen his.

And despite his feigned principled exception to making public credal statements, his own Twitter bio contains brazen PopCult and Death Cult self-identifications.

The Death Cult is a heretical, Christianity-profaning religion that currently wraps itself in political trappings out of convenience. That's why Jon's valiant attempts to argue on the Left-Right spectrum just let Rich lead him around in circles, whereas applying the Witch Test shut him up for hours.

Don't bother debating politics with death cultists. Go straight to religion.

blogvad gita #fundie community.livejournal.com

Demon worshiper and muscleman Barack "Saddam" Hussein OBama has sent his liberal/neo-conservative windbags on a massivesl disinformation campaign against Ron Paul and yours truly. The Paper Tiger is roaring but his wall-street/Federal Reserve islamo-banking baby-killing petro-federalist paws of inequity. We must slash in the incomprehensible nothingness of their untruth! They fail to even grasp the Consciousness of Ron Paul Nation.

Freedom, Free Trade, Anarcho-Capitalism.

Peace.


Join me brothers, lets defend the RE-love-olution from the welfare-bleeding heart liberals and their corporate patrons.

Zaccheas....


Here are the traitors to america:
http://community.livejournal.com/obama_2008/320178.html

Signaferte #fundie nymag.com

Firstly, the New Right is based off the Nouvelle Droite from Europe, an ethnic nationalist reaction against demographic changes in the west.

There is no connection between "Kosher Conservatives", i.e Republicans, evangelical christians, British Conservative Party, libertarians with this. It grew in Europe in the 90's and 00's as an existential crisis about migration, ageing populations, removal of traditional architecture, Americanization, and populist dislike of conservatives and liberals. It spread to the US in the late 00's online

Trumpists only partially overlap. Most Trumpists are Republicans, who cannot be "New Right'. Early on a lot of New Rightists supported Trump out of hate of Republicans and his few decent ideas, such as saying the Iraq war was bad and comments against globalism (alt-right is anti-war and doesn't support the US military)

Most Rightists have given up on him even before the election. He came out in support of globalism, supports mega-capitalism, supports pollution, has a Judeo-Christian zealot as VP, gone on neocon forades in Syria (All new-righters support Assad). The alt/new right is against military intervention, nation building, excess consumerism, obesity, fossil fuels (American-style) Judeo-Christianity, Americanization of culture, neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and of course cultural left-wing stuff.

The alt-right wants a world in which Europe is inhabited by whites practicing native traditional culture, higher birth rates, the USA is isolationist (and possibly split up) and doesn't spread pop-culture, green energy, third position economics (no excessive capitalism or socialism), rebuilding traditional architecture, education and academia are pro-Western

Jim #wingnut #racist #conspiracy #transphobia blog.jim.com

[From "State of the left singularity"]

Preamble, to get those not yet darkly enlightened up to speed
Leftism is entropy in the apparatus of state. Leftists ally with far against near, in the struggle within the state.

The driving force of leftism is a holiness spiral. The state is a synthetic tribe, so the state always has, furtively or openly, a state religion, so leftists struggle for power by endlessly adding new, ever holier, stuff to the state religion, and eliminating the unprincipled exceptions and theological inconsistencies that made earlier forms of the state religion workable and practical.

Thus leftism goes ever lefter. And the more disordered the state becomes, the faster it goes left, and more left it becomes the more disordered it becomes.

Every day the left gets lefter.

As we approach the left singularity, as the left goes faster and faster leftwards, tidal forces increase, with the left most part of the left moving left faster than the not so left part of the left, the leftmost become increasingly dangerous to the not quite so left.

The radical left is purging the less radical left, purging the Haidt / Mounck / Pinker axis. They probably will not purge Biden, since more and more often, he no longer knows where he is, what year it is, and fails to recognize family, but Pelosi is headed for removal soon enough, finding it increasingly difficult to control the radicals, and increasingly make self destructive concessions to them.

These fractures within the left eventually result in the left singularity being halted short of infinite leftism, as sooner or later, someone important decides “Yes, I do have enemies to the left and I have no choice but do whatever it takes to stop them.”

To merely stabilize movement ever leftwards, ever faster, it has to become as dangerous to be too far left as it is to be too far right. That, merely stabilizing the left wing singularity to current levels, as Stalin and Cromwell did, is a quite drastic measure, and the more dangerous it has become to be too far right, the more dangerous it has to become to be too far left, and the more drastic a measure it is. Cromwell’s measures were drastic, but non lethal. Stalin’s measures were drastic and massively lethal and nothing less could have saved Russia. Once they started killing rightists, it could only be stabilized by killing leftists.

England having been stabilized non lethally, Charles the Second could then restore normality by merely massively purging the state Church, executing a handful of people, and encouraging large numbers of clerics to get out of England. Unfortunately many of them went to America, where they founded Harvard, and have been plotting to take over the world since then.

Harvard was the Vatican, the official state Church of New England, thus the left has organizational continuity and continuity of personnel all the way back to the Christian state church of ancient times. Today, as when Emperor Constantine founded Constantinople, you cannot get a job in the state and quasi state apparatus, unless you have passed catechisms administered by the seminaries of the state religion, but while the catechisms of Constantine’s Church concerned unfalsifiable claims about the next world, today’s catechisms contain ever growing falsifiable and false claims about this world,

[…]
And now, the meat of the post, where we are today
Drag Queens having government sponsored and government approved sex on the floor of the public library with nine year old boys. The books in the library they performed sexual acts on the floor have been purged of all thought crime, and the library needs a coat of paint.

Schools pressuring students to transsexualize.

A school curriculum of hatred against white people, reading, writing, and arithmetic being white privilege. Quiet in the classroom being white privilege.

Arrest quotas on blacks that enable them to swagger down the street because they can beat up white people with impunity and not get charged or arrested, but white people will be arrested for defending themselves.

Ever increasing violence and intimidation against anyone insufficiently left wing.

Collapse of marriage and family.

Courtship and dating can no longer be plausibly or interestingly depicted in movies, books and dance videos. the destruction of Star Wars and the self destruction of Marvel Comics. Han Soylo. The mating dance can no longer be realistically or entertainingly depicted. Dance videos can no longer depict men acting male and women acting female.

Child protective services abducting children from Christian families and selling them to gays.

Hatred of white people and America taught in schools. Second class citizenship for whites.

That pretty girls no longer walk the Embarcadero, that José Inez García Zárate came to San Francisco illegally, lived on crime and welfare, and is still there despite illegal status and numerous arrests for very serious crimes, that Zárate murdered Kathryn Steinle on the Embarcadero because she was white, that he was acquitted because a brown man murdering a white girl.

White flight, whites are now fleeing San Francisco as they fled Detroit.

White flight everywhere. We are running out of places in America to run to. Most white people in America cannot return to the place that they were born and raised because “It has changed”, though if they were to say how it has changed, that would be a thought crime. The cost of housing soars as we run out of places to flee to

The silicon valley meritocracy exemption has collapsed, and now silicon valley is collapsing because of affirmative action. They now have to practice affirmative action like everyone else. Hot new technology no longer comes out of Silicon Valley.

Abortion as a holy sacrament. They shut down the Churches and the cancer wards, but did not shut down the abortion mills.

The collapse of intelligence in the student intake of Harvard and Yale. They are stupid, because selected for race, sex, and political correctness, not ability as they select for PC rather than smarts.

[…]

Increasingly second class citizenship for white people. There are arrest quotas limiting the arrest of blacks, so a black can attack white people with little risk, while if a white defends himself, he faces grave risk. So blacks swagger down the street and disrupt the workplace.

The pope worshiping naked pagan idols.

[…]

That a man’s obligation to look after his wife and children is legally and socially enforced, and his obligation to love and cherish socially enforced, but a woman has no legal or social obligation to refrain from cucking her husband, and her obligation to honor and obey is not only not socially enforced, but aggressively opposed.

Brett Stevens #wingnut #elitist #racist amerika.org

In other words, Leftists experience more reinforcement of their behavior from propaganda, where Rightists use it mostly to confirm what they already know, although both sides seem to be pursuing information which confirms their assumptions rather than seeking new ideas.

This shows us that the Leftists are accusing us of what they are doing yet again. Their propaganda works on them, but ours seeks merely to remind us of what we believe. This makes sense since we are the minority party in a time when the West has consistently shifted far Left, especially since the 1960s.

When we look back further, what it meant to be Right-wing, centrist, and Left-wing have changed a great deal since the early 1900s. After the Great Depression, America swung Left as hard as it did in the years following the Civil War. Panic over the system failing led to embrace of desperate hopes.

This means that Rightists are trying to maintain opposition to the dominant paradigm of our time, which is liberal democratic market socialism, a fundamentally Leftist system with free markets grafted in to fund it, and globalism grafted on to spread it like the coronavirus on a cruise ship.

It also shows that the infection model applies to Leftism, not Rightism. Rightists are noticing that the Leftist system is not working, and then confirming those observations with propaganda; Leftists are trying to maintain denial of the failure of this system with increasingly inflammatory propaganda.

Transpig From Pluto #fundie fstdt.com

The absurdity of what trans activists want is incredible.

If we (the normal men and women that is) shouldn't care who comes into the restroom because "it's just a room to pee in", then the same can be said of trans people who are asked to go the restroom that corresponds with their actual biological features. "It's just a room to pee in, trans folks" LOL. Why are you "triggered" if you're asked to go either the men's room or the women's room?

Your position is self-refuting.

Never mind that it's essentially a non-issue if you look the part. If you're a biological man but can credibly pass off as a woman, we won't notice anyway. In fact in that situation where you've fully transitioned, we'll probably be creeped out if you go to the men's room. Why then are you so worried?

So the issue is much more insane. You want biological men, who still look male, and biological women, who still look women, to go where they please merely by stating "I identify as..." Technically even a "cis" (i.e. normal) troll could do it. I could come in with my male voice and maley beard and male body that hasn't seen a day of hormone treatment and stuff and not get thrown out merely by utterly the magic words "I identify as a female".

And I could probably legally expose myself in the locker room too to women who maybe don't wanna see that shit. In any other sane circumstance I'd be arrested.

The bonkers left is at it again. So progressive it's now actually anti-feminist LOL, doesn't care about women at all now when it has a new group to exploit.

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child #fundie 3edgesword.blogspot.com

[From "Alarm Bells are ringing in taxpayer's ears"]

Far-left advocacy group Public Interest Alberta (their slogan: "helping unions make Alberta as pleasant a place as Detroit or Venezuela") has unleashed a report on "increasingly unacceptable classroom conditions and lack of support staff" in the province. Specifically, this push survey asked a bunch of teachers and parents how much money they'd spend if there was no limit to what the province had stolen from taxpayers this year.

[...]

Okay, onto our next respondent: a Calgary parent

As integration of students with complex needs becomes more and more common, the teachers are expected to provide an education to all of these different types of learners with little support.

I have a crazy idea.

It's totally bonkers.

It's loony tunes.

It's so absolutely balls-in-another-man's face retarded that if it was a student it would be in a little class by the boiler room waiting for the short bus.

How about we stop "integrating students with complex needs" and instead go put them back in a little class by the boiler room waiting for the short bus? The reason we did that is because most of these retarded kids cannot learn anything. At best, we can try to get these mongloid little hormone factories in good enough shape that when they get to the age where they want to screw everything that moved they understood what the words "don't do that" was when we told them to not do that.†

Instead, we end up in the ridiculous situation where 85% of classrooms have "special needs" kids in them. That's completely unacceptable, and is by design encouraged to require "handlers" for each kid in each class. I've seen a class with no less than three retard babysitters required to watch each individual retard.

† This is, by the way, one of the primary reasons that we needed (and still need) to sterilize mentally incompetent people who are wards of the state. What happens is they tend to screw and make more wards of the state. Years back, the Mitchener Centre in Red Deer learned this the hard way: their retarded clientele couldn't tie their shoes or spell their name or say hello without slobbering over their chins. They couldn't figure out forks, radio knobs, or zippers. Yet when their adult hormones kicked into gear, these horny mongloids had no trouble figuring out doors, keys, light switches, and fences: staff routinely found them screwing in the bushes. 9 months later, the Province of Alberta was greeted with a new ward of the state. Yes yes on occasion the baby produced would be perfectly normal, and eventually would go onto be a functioning member of society. But the genetics don't fib.

[...]

My daughter in grade 1 has been told to ignore the Kindergarten boy who repeatedly punches other students whenever he is upset. She came home and said “It was my turn to get punched today Mommy”

3 children in the school that need diapering, have no speech, one who usually rolls around on the floor and moans. Staff regularly bruised and bitten. Recently teacher was bitten so badly blood was spurting out of her arm. These three are so labour intensive that other children in other grades with special needs get no service. No proper services for the three children. No proper supports for the staff team being pulled in to keep finger in the dike. Staff have been issued protective arm sleeves. Give me a break.

Again, here's a suggestion that's so simple it's a black mark forever on the "educators" in the system that they've never suggested or thought of it: get these fucking retards out of schools and into rubber rooms where they can be sterilized and ignored forever. We're paying for this level of "service"? Why, exactly?

It might also help with this Grade 1 class issue in Edmonton:

Autism - limited verbal, screams high pitch screams often, runs every 7-10 mins, functions at about 3 yr old development level, funding only provides .5 assistant time ... The child cannot be left alone so two EAs are required throughout the day and funding is only providing .5 of an assistant. School had to go thousands into debt to ensure adequate coverage. No extra support for the remaining students with high needs.

Instead of schools going into debt for "adequate coverage" of retarded kids who will never function well enough to pay a dime of taxes for the rest of their lives, cut it off.

Okay, enough about the retards. We're coddling them and putting them in classes trying to pretend they are in any sense "equals" with the normal kids they're seated along with. It's a disaster, the teachers unions and the far-left are complicit in it, it needs to end. What else is going on that's negatively impacting classroom education?

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

[From "Where is the God-Emperor?"]

James Kirkpatrick wonders where the so-called leadership of the mainstream Right is in the struggle against the violent Left:

Saturday, however, was different. Antifa has been quite open about their desire to “shut down” the rally [Why The Bay Area Must Shut Down the Alt-Right Rally on April 15th, IndyBay, April 5, 2017]. So nationalists came prepared for violence, knowing the police would not protect them. And that’s precisely what happened—it just didn’t end the way antifa thought it would.

In short, Leftists started it, Rightists finished it.

What is really happening here: the American Right is finally learning to fight back, both ideologically and physically. They are breaking the taboos of the past. And powered by the freewheeling internet culture that spawned the new nationalism, the Trump supporters who rolled out to defend conservative speakers were dressed in colorful, often humorous costumes, as opposed to the grim, blackclad antifa, the staid enforcers of the status quo....

What’s truly incredible: even now, the American Right is still fighting with one hand behind its back, receiving no support from its supposed political leaders, including Donald Trump.

Though President Trump has gone out of his way to praise his non-white supporters, he has not once specifically praised the European-Americans who were at the core of his winning coalition. Even worse, he has not once defended his supporters who are being attacked on the streets and fighting in his name.

Trump may be President of the United States, but it is still very dangerous to wear a MAGA hat or Trump shirt in some cities.

Now, I'm not a leader of anything except the ELoE, but someone asked me, in my capacity as a known Alt-Right figure, if I would feel bad, or guilty, if blood were to be shed as a consequence of the Alt-Right's refusal to submit to the threat of violence from Black Bloc, antifa, and the post-American Left.

The answer, quite simply, is no. Not even a little bit. The course is set. The consequences are inevitable. The socionomic verdict is clear and the time of positive social mood, economic expansion, and peace is over. What we're seeing now are merely the first little steps towards the large-scale uncivil war that will be a significant part of the inevitable decline and collapse of the United States. Men have a responsibility to defend their families, their people, their nation, and their civilization, and I am very glad to see that there are still Americans, and Russians, and English, and nationalists of every civilized nation, who are willing to stand up and do so before it is too late.

The USA cannot be saved as a single entity because the American nation no longer controls the US state and has not done so for decades. Most of the European nation-states can still be saved, although the fate of a few, such as Sweden, may be in doubt. But that is because they are, despite being adulterated, still actual nations, whereas the USA is multiethnic empire held together by force, societal inertia, and deceit.

And now the lies are failing even as the centripetal societal forces gather momentum. Roosh sees four options:

There are four outcomes that can proceed from the juncture of which we stand. The first is a globalist resurgence at the polls thanks to demographic changes that push the vote far to the left, starting in 2024. If this happens, we will have a president that is more authoritarian than Hillary Clinton. The boot will come down on all facets of American life, especially speech, and we will essentially be living in an open-air prison.

The second outcome is a hot war where we win. The country will be ravaged and millions will die, but at least most of the deaths will be leftists.

The third option is a hot war where we lose because of foreign involvement. Not only are we much more likely to die in this engagement, but the globalist boot will come down with such a viciousness that those on the right who survive may hope that they had died in the war.

And the fourth option is the long divorce, one that we will easily win if the recommendations I made above are taken. Very few people die and life can proceed with high stability and prosperity for the majority of the country.

My expectation is a fifth one. I think uncivil war and partition coming on the heels of economic collapse is the most likely outcome. Warlords, corporate armies, and 4GW forces will arise. Some polities will be ethnically cleansed, others will be mixed, either by choice or by defeat. Remember, homogeneous societies tend to arise from larger heterogeneous forebears.

gs #fundie gnxp.com

“have had to grapple with the reality that the right to choose may well be used selectively to abort fetuses deemed genetically undesirable.” Are they completely mad? Surely it’s one of the most upright, proper reasons to have an abortion?

Dudes,

You’ve said you don’t pay that much attention to the political blogosphere, so don’t be offended if I tell you that this has been all the rage there for the last week. I noticed this while scanning the CNS of the left (Atrios), which I read once in a while just to see what they’re buzzing about.

To give two examples, it’s been discussed by Michael Berube (left blogger; father of a Down’s kid) and George Will (right-wing; father of a Down’s kid).

GNXP types are likely to state what you did bluntly and autistically. That just doesn’t happen in the rest of the blogosphere.

IMO, Will says nothing he hasn’t said before a million times: he crudely accuses us of favoring genocide against a group of people who are no different from the rest of us (while admitting that his son has a genetic “defect”). Berube is making a much more sophisticated argument against the limits of individual autonomy. I grant him that…but isn’t the choice to have a Down’s child based upon the autonomy argument? It benefits Berube to have his Down’s child. What does it benefit the rest of society?

People like this are impotent in the face of greater technological firepower. Let them talk all they want. They will buy it when it is sold, whether they lie to themselves about it or not.

Of course, you don’t come out and tell them straight up that they *will* violate various leftist (and rightist) shibboleths. You don’t have to tell them, because they’re just going to do it, in the same way they put their kids into private schools to insulate them from dangerous urban minorities.

In any case, whatever Will & Berube think, the easier testing methods will drastically reduce the amount of Down’s babies born to both younger & older women.

That is, I think it’s funny when feminists end up without kids. The fact that Amanda Marcotte’s line will die out with her is a boon to all humanity, and a silver line to the current dysgenic cloud.

it’s not funny at all. Tough choice, tough choice. A friend of mine was in this situation; fortunately for his genes [though he didn't see it that way at the time], his wife cheated on him and they got a divorce. He ended up with a younger woman and his 2nd kid is on the way. Her? Alone as a 40 year old adjunct at some no-name place.

I don’t know a good solution to this, but we ought to be trying to find one. It can’t be reasonable to have high-functioning women pushed out of having kids, or pushed into having kids at high risk of problems, or pushed into giving up their aspirations for a demanding career so they can have kids. While the biology is not in our control, the other stuff probably is.

There’s an obvious dysgenic effect to having smart, driven women unable to start having kids till very late in the window of safe times to have kids. I wonder if there are other, more subtle, effects.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

It is readily observable that there is no such thing as a static sexual abnormality. Was Ian Watkins always a pedophile? Was the thrice-married Meredith Baxter Birney always a lesbian? The dynamic sin model explains observable human behavior rather better than most of the scientific alternatives, particularly the static ones. Regardless, whether it is a simple choice or a curable psychological disorder, the idea that homosexuality is always and necessarily a permanently fixed orientation is demonstrably false. Any homosexual who dares to question this, much less dispute it, must be asked why they deny science. And statistics.


UPDATE: This objection on Twitter made me laugh. Critics, it might help to keep in mind you're dealing with a superintelligence before you say something stupid, all right? I'm smarter than you are. Just assume that even if you don't believe it; it may save you some embarrassment. That doesn't mean I'm always right, it just means that you're probably wrong.

Buttercup Dew: "Your logic doesn't follow? I was "bisexual" as a teen, now unambiguously homosexual. You decided conclusion and worked backwards."

To which I responded: "No, my logic is correct. You prove the point. The fact of the delta is what matters, not the direction."

David J. Stewart #sexist jesusisprecious.org

A couple years ago, I gave some Alexander Scourby audio King James Bibles to a Bob Jones University woman that I liked at a local church, but she didn't even say thank you! (She was the one who cold-heartedly told me to go away!) She will make a great old maid some day! I know some ungrateful people believe that a gift is free, and so you ought not be expected to thank them. However, that is a poor attitude. If someone gives you something and you don't thank them, you are an ingrate! If you don't thank God for your eternal life, and for pardoning all your rotten sins, you deserve to burn in Hell as an ingrate! Yet, our great God “is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil” (Luke 6:35).

This generation of ungodly spoiled brats, sluts, dykes and lesbians is going straight to Hell. And sadly, that feminist influence has crept into our churches, masculinizing our women, so that they are tough like men these days. It is sickening! I admit that I ABSOLUTELY HATE military women! I detest them! I cannot stand them! GET AWAY FROM ME!!! I detest women cops. They belong at home burping babies, baking cookies and being a good wife! I can't stand professional type women, who dress and act decisively like men. It is Biblically wrong! The perverse “UNISEX” (MP3 sermon by Dr. Jack Hyles) movement has destroyed our country. Where is the feminine, sweet, loving and submissive woman anymore? A feminist brat doesn't just all of a sudden become a loving, sweet and submissive wife after she gets married. Women are messed up, so much so that many Christian women don't even know how to be feminine anymore. And worse of all, they don't desire to be! Feminine women are literally mocked and laughed at by American religious women today. Our nation has become so evil and far away from God that people get mad when anybody calls a queer a queer! People don't want to hear the truth. In today's ungodly society, you are allowed to talk about how wonderful it is to be a sodomizing queer, but you are ganged-up on and called a hateful bigot if you say that homosexuality is a filthy sin! That is the truth by the way! Homosexuality is a filthy disgusting sin!

This untoward generation hates those who hate unrighteousness! Truth is only hate to those who hate THE TRUTH! I hate every falsehood, because I love THE TRUTH of God's inspired Word. Psalms 119:104, “Through thy precepts I get understanding: therefore I hate every false way.” Women are so screwed up today that many of them are having their eggs frozen, so they can pursue a career, and have children in their 40's. If that is you, YOU DON'T DESERVE TO BE A MOTHER! A recent study in 2018 found that many woman aren't freezing their eggs to pursue a career, but simply because THEY HAVEN'T FOUND A MAN!!! Ha, am I right on target or what? If that is not bonkers, what is? Hey, I've got a question: What's the difference between a Bob Jones University nurse who is too religious to settle for a cool guy for a husband, or a nut that freezes her eggs because she is too messed up to find a husband? NOTHING! They are both going to die old maids! Call me what you want, I've got all the e-mails from guys just like me, who are bewildered at how bonkers women are today! And sadly that includes church women too! What does a poor guy have to do nowadays to get married?

Rebel Wolf #sexist i.redditmedia.com

Sad...very sad.

I am just as disgusted when two females swap spit, no matter how attractive they happen to be as I am when two "men" go at it....??

I know fellow men go absolutely bonkers when females even kiss, and I saw many things while bouncing in bars a few years ago...at first it was comical, but I became very angry towards my fellow man, no self-respect whatsoever! ??
But I was the odd one, because I didn't drool all over myself at the sight of a pair of "lipstick lesbians"

R.W.

Andrea Hardie AKA Janet Bloomfield AKA JudgyBitch #racist #wingnut #psycho archive.is

Yes, I’m a Nazi. And how are you?

I’m the daughter of a Lebensborn. Grand-daughter of an SS Officer. I’m Aryan by culture and by blood. The word “Nazi” is getting thrown around quite a lot lately, and I think it’s time we settled on a definition. I’m rather offended by the broadening of who gets to call themselves a Nazi.

Quite frankly, I’m sick of the cultural appropriation.

Nazi is a short form way of saying National Socialist, but most current Nazis realize that socialism is completely bonkers and the reason Hitler lost. Had he been a proper capitalist, he would not have had such supply chain management issues and his Army would have survived that disastrous winter on the Russian front. Stalingrad would have fallen. Socialists can’t do anything right. Also, the Russians were willing to eat each other. We Nazis might have a well-deserved reputation for savagery, but even we have standards.

Simply sharing the political ideology of socialism is not a sufficient condition for calling anyone a Nazi. The world is filled with wingnut socialists like Bernie Sanders and Mitt Romney and they can’t all be Nazis. That is too broad a brush.

Being a Nazi, much like being a Muslim, is far more than just a set of ideas about how to structure society. It’s ultimately about annihilation. The complete and utter destruction of the weak, the inferior, the non-believers. There is a profound science based on biological fact that underwrites real Nazism. Yes, your eye color matters. Yes, the shade of your hair matters. Your height matters. Your weight matters. This is not based on some sort of preference derived purely from aesthetics. That’s nonsense. It is settled science that height and weight and the amount of melanin in your body is correlated with intelligence, accomplishment, leadership ability and just general superiority.

Tall, fit blondes are better than everyone else.

Sorry. Not liking that fact does not alter the truth value. You only need to see Wilm Hosenfeld standing next to the starving Jew pianist to see clearly the pre-eminence of Nazi blood.

Nazi is a synonym for physical superiority. Genetic superiority. The promise of what humanity can become. Low IQ Trump voters clearly do not qualify, on body weight alone. Real Nazis have an intrinsic pride that renounces thuggery and street violence. If we are going to eradicate deplorables, we do so with elegance and efficacy. Nazis are still Germans, after all.

There is much talk about resisting Nazis by punching them.

This is a grave mistake. Nazis don’t punch back. They exterminate. Be careful what you wish for. Be careful you do not give rise to what you are protesting. I’m happy with a police state. I have no fear. I have no need to fear the authority.

I am the authority.

And I do not fear making difficult, fraught decisions. Strength, after all, lies in attack, not defense. I am the daughter of a Lebensborn. I have blonde hair and blue eyes and I have borne three children who also have blonde hair and blue eyes. I am the future. I claim my place by declaring proudly that I am a Nazi.

The future has no room for gay Jews who may be charming and silly and great fun, but who will never father beautiful Aryan children.

Let’s be more precise about how we use the term Nazi. It would be such a shame if the word were to be used so irreverently and casually that it lost all meaning.

That’s just not reich.

Lots of love,

JB

Timothy Wilson #wingnut #conspiracy #psycho dailykos.com

Given the intensity of the conspiracy theories on the radical right that have arisen around the coronavirus pandemic—particularly the number of rightists claiming that government lockdown orders are an initial step in the imposition of a tyrannical order—it was only a matter of time before the U.S. experienced its first coronavirus-related act of domestic terrorism.

On Tuesday, a Missouri man named Timothy Wilson made preparations to set off a car bomb at a local hospital in suburban Belton, which was intended as a revolt against the stay-at-home order issued by Belton’s mayor, but his plan was cut short by an FBI raid. When he apparently resisted with a weapon, he ended up being shot and killed.

Wilson had been the subject of an ongoing domestic terrorism investigation since September, according to an FBI statement. “Wilson was actively planning to commit an act of domestic terrorism—a bombing—and over the course of several months had considered several targets,” it read.

A number of far-right extremists have claimed that the pandemic is secretly a cover for the imposition of a totalitarian “globalist” government. Wilson, who was a participant in neo-Nazi chat rooms, decided to enact a plan he had already concocted for creating a car bomb and use it on a hospital in Belton, the FBI said.

“Wilson considered various targets and ultimately settled on an area hospital in an attempt to harm many people, targeting a facility that is providing critical medical care in today’s environment,” the statement read. “Wilson had taken the necessary steps to acquire materials needed to build an explosive device.”

There was no actual bomb. Wilson had arrived at a residence in Belton with his own vehicle, believing the person there had constructed a device for him. It's unclear whether Wilson was shot by FBI agents as they moved in to arrest him, or whether he shot himself.

The FBI’s interest in Wilson apparently originated with his heavy involvement in some of the same neo-Nazi factions that have produced a string of arrests in recent months. Nick Martin at The Informant reports that Wilson “was an admirer of the 1980s terrorist group The Order and had ties to two active neo-Nazi organizations.”

One of Martin’s sources identified Wilson as the Telegram user “Werwolfe 84,” which enabled Martin and Elon University computer science professor Megan Squire to determine Wilson’s involvement in two public Telegram channels for neo-Nazi groups: one for the National Socialist Movement (NSM) and one for the violence-oriented Vorherrschaft Division (VSD).

anonymous #fundie fstdt.com

[ on someone supporting torturing the family members of alleged terrorists in order to get information ]

We wouldn't even be talking about this shit if leftists and phony rightists weren't so damn weak on Islam.

I don't blame TimeToTurn, I blame the left. The longer the west does nothing, the harder it will be to fight Islamic supremacism without compromising your own humanity. The longer we wait, the harder it will be to solve the problem of Islamization of the west humanely. We will either be stuck with a growing problem of terrorism, become a police state or it will be a bloody civil war when people have had enough of Islamic supremacists defiling our otherwise free and tolerant societies, forming no-go zones, calling for Sharia law, forming Sharia vigilante groups and doing terrorism etc.

When people peacefully criticized Islam - the left said that was "hateful" and "Islam is a religion of peace".

When people argued for restrictions on Muslim immigration - the left said that was "racist", even though Islam isn't a race and immigration isn't a right but a privilege.

When people argued that Muslim immigrants should integrate into western society or leave - the left said "no we have to be multicultural and all cultures are equal". A sensible immigration policy could have solved most of these problems, but the left opposed any discussions on it, ignored all the connections between Islamic doctrine (such as the perpetual warfare doctrine in Surahs 9:5 and 9:29) and Islamic terrorism so now Europe has a significant 5th column on their soil that they can't even identify easily let alone deport (because many of them are 2nd generation migrants with citizenship, action can only be taken after the terrorist attack has already been committed). And the left wants more. More Muslim immigrants and Muslim refugees, including with mandatory quotas so they want this imposed on Eastern Europe as well, which is barely recovering from half a century of communism. It's almost as if they're intentionally setting up conditions for a civil war in the west. Neither malice nor stupidity should be tolerated of our politicians.

Seane-Anna #fundie sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com

Western culture is under siege from two prime evils: Marxism and Islam. We both see the threat of Islam but too many Rightists are dismissing the threat of cultural, as opposed to political, Marxism. Cultural Marxism is epitomized by the normalizing of homosexuality, which is a crucial part of the cultural Left's plan to eradicate Christian values.

If we don't firmly oppose cultural Marxism we can kiss the Christian West goodbye. If fact, it's already almost totally gone and we can't blame the Muslims for that. We can only blame ourselves. We have failed our civilization and our God, and that's a crying shame.

T0000009 #sexist wehuntedthemammoth.com

Men, not you slick, built the world while you and the cabal of tramps crying about us leaving you to fend for yourselves were blaming us for your own idiocy and poor choices. When it all crumbles that isn’t going to save you, and those tramps will be begging one of those useless vermin to save them with the only thing they have to offer, REAL newsflash kid it isn’t her personality because she doesn’t have one. Oh and all those ingrates from the third world won’t be much help either, suck it up buttercup and enjoy the pain and suffering you wanted.

We don’t want you, don’t need you, and could care less what you think!

Everything you see when you drive down the road, including the road, was built by men, not women. All of the world’s cities, neighborhoods and roads were built by man-ual labor, not fem-ual labor.

All of the rights and privileges today’s women hold over men’s heads in exchange for the those two circles and a triangle were bought and paid for through the trafficking, exploitation, usury and disposal of men.

What we built, we will tear down. Men are the key to women’s survival. You can mass murder all the babies you want. You’ll only be cutting off your nose to spite your entitled, narcissistic and callous face – in an effort to destroy those that gave you everything upon which you rely for female advancement over men. Ga head. Make my day. Gunslinger time.

MGTOW is why you sometimes bolt upright in bed at night following a mind shaking nightmare.

We’re here, we couldn’t care less what you think, we know all your mind games and can’t wait for your feeble rebuttal. Come at me. I dare you.

Stephen Gowans #fundie gowans.wordpress.com

(From an article titled "Why North Korea Needs Nuclear Weapons")

Because North Korea has long been vilified and condemned by the Western press as bellicose, provocative and unpredictable, it’s difficult to cut through the fog of vituperation that obscures any kind of dispassionate understanding of the country to grasp that the DPRK represents something praiseworthy: a tradition of struggle against oppression and foreign domination, rooted in the experience of a majority of Koreans dating back to the end of WWII and the period of Japanese colonial rule. This tradition found expression in the Korean People’s Republic, a national government, created by, for, and of Koreans, that was already in place when US troops landed at Inchon in September, 1945. The new government was comprised of leftists who had won the backing of the majority, partly because they had led the struggle against Japan’s colonial occupation, and partly because they promised relief from exploitation by landlords and capitalists. The USSR, which occupied the north of the country until 1948, worked with the KPR in its occupation zone, but the United States suppressed the KPR in the south, worked to exterminate leftist forces in its zone, and backed conservatives reviled by Koreans for their oppressions and collaboration with the Japanese. By 1948, the peninsula was divided between a northern government led by guerrillas and activists who fought to liberate Korea from Japanese rule, and a southern government led by a US-installed anti-communist backed by conservatives tainted by collaboration with colonial oppression. For the next 65 years, the essential character of the competing regimes has remained the same. Park Geun-hye, the incoming South Korean president is the daughter of a former president, Park Chung-hee, who came to power in a military coup in 1961. The elder Park had served in the Japanese Imperial Army. Kim Il Sung, grandfather of North Korea’s current leader, Kim Jong-eun, was an important guerrilla leader who, unlike the collaborator Park, fought, rather than served, the Japanese. The North represents the traditions of struggle against foreign domination, both political and economic, while the South represents the tradition of submission to and collaboration with a foreign hegemon. Significantly, there are no foreign troops stationed in North Korea, but are in South Korea. North Korean troops have never fought abroad, but South Korea’s have, odiously in Vietnam, in return for infusions of mercenary lucre from the Americans, and later in Iraq. As regards repression, South Korea’s authoritarianism on behalf of rightist causes is long and enduring, typified in the virulently anti-communist National Security Law, which metes out harsh punishment to anyone who so much as publicly utters a kind word about North Korea. The South Korean police state also blocks access to pro-North Korean websites, bans books, including volumes by Noam Chomsky and heterodox (though pro-capitalist) economist Ha Joon-chang, and imprisons anyone who travels to the North.

...

North Korea is one of the few countries left that commits “the supreme evil.” Allowed to develop in peace, unimpeded by military pressure and economic warfare, it might become an inspiration for other countries to follow. From the perspective of the US ruling class, the United States’ North Korea policy must have one overarching objective: the DPRK’s demise. Asked by The New York Times to explain the aim of US policy on North Korea, then US under secretary of state for arms control John Bolton “strode over to a bookshelf, pulled off a volume and slapped it on the table. It was called ‘The End of North Korea.'” “‘That,’ he said, ‘is our policy.'” [2]

On top of profit-making goals, and crippling North Korea economically, politically and socially to prevent its emergence as an inspiring example to other countries, Washington seeks to maintain access to its strategic position on a peninsula whose proximity to China and Russia provides a forward operating base from which to pressure these two significant obstacles to the United States’ complete domination of the globe.

F. Roger Devlin #sexist toqonline.com

[A review of Charles Murray's "Coming Apart"]

The products of the entertainment industry still usually validated American norms. Subjects such as abortion and homosexuality were never touched upon in television shows, only rarely and disapprovingly in movies. Most liberals were willing to say that extramarital sex was wrong. Only three and one-half percent of American families were headed by a divorced parent. In many neighborhoods, houses were left unlocked and children could go about unsupervised.

But American women had “much to be outraged about,” the author tells us, such as being expected to marry and have children! If Murray gets portrayed as a ‘hard-rightist,’ it is only because presenting data honestly is now all such a designation requires or implies.

...

Murray writes that “being a single mother is tough, and it is appropriate to sympathize with women who are in that situation.” He does not say it is appropriate to be sympathetic to the manchildren of Fishtown, and most readers will be left with the impression that what they need is a good kick in the pants. Yet I wonder whether the same factors did not produce the undesirable behavior of both men and women that he notes today.

In the America of 1963, a high school graduate might expect to find a job which would allow him to marry and permit his wife the leisure to stay home raising a few children. He could buy a freestanding house and a car, and still afford to take the family on a two week vacation every summer. The wife would have been reared with a view to preparing her for the duties of marriage and motherhood; she may even have taken ‘Home Ec’ in school.

Then gradually, beginning in the 1960s, women became convinced marriage was an imposition to be ‘outraged’ about. Helen Gurley Brown began whispering in their ears that an independent career path could be filled with exciting romances involving attractive men, free of the ‘drudgery’ to which marriage consigned their mothers. The family income was abolished in favor of ‘equal pay for equal work.’ The law was changed to permit women to divorce their husbands unilaterally and without grounds. (Wives are responsible for around ninety percent of divorces.)

None of this much affects the men at the top of the income and status hierarchy. They make enough money that even women with personal incomes perceive them as supporters and are willing to marry them. If a wife leaves after the baby is born, child support payments are manageable and a replacement wife is easily found.

The Fishtown girls who might have married working men in 1960 may well be earning more than such men today just by sitting at desks entering data. They can obtain higher quality sperm from more desirable men without submitting to the constraints of lifelong monogamy; the ‘ex’ and/or the taxpayer is made to provide for any resulting children. They even enjoy the sympathy of male commentators for the terrible hardship all this supposedly represents. Is it any wonder such women are reluctant to devote their lives to raising the children of ill-paid construction workers?

The contemporary Fishtown man, his wages reduced by female competition and the ever-decreasing market value of upper-body strength, has correspondingly slim chances of earning enough to make himself an acceptable suitor to any woman with an income of her own. These men are not ‘retreating from the marriage market’; they are being driven from it as a matter of deliberate policy.

Even if a particular working class man beats the odds and finds a girl to marry, he cannot expect the satisfaction of supporting her; she may well end up supporting him. And what self-respecting man wants to end up like that poor sap uselessly tagging along behind his wife who just bought all the groceries?

But this is still not the worst. Prospective husbands stand a good chance of losing everything in the divorce settlement within a few years of the wedding. Child support is not so easy when it must be paid through low-skilled labor. Even if you avoid being jailed as a ‘deadbeat dad,’ you will certainly not have enough left over to contemplate a second marriage.

In short, the American dream of a home and family through honest labor is now far out of reach for an increasing number of low-status men. Under these circumstances, what is such a man to do with his life? I’d say an unconstrained bachelor existence with plenty of time for amusements looks very much like a rational choice. The male commentariat may make you out to be a bum, but that sure beats years of performing all the hard work traditionally required to support a family and then not getting the family.

Aristotle understood that certain virtues have social presuppositions: liberality, for example, can hardly be expected from persons living hand-to-mouth. Male industriousness, I would suggest, also presupposes certain social arrangements. Monogamy and the family wage system give you the Irish immigrant who strives to make gentlemen of his children with every blow of his axe; liberated women earning equal pay for their equal work bring forth the men of the Sunshine Club.

So single motherhood and the decline in male industriousness our author describes cannot be spirited away simply by getting men and women to the altar. ‘Outrageous’ though it may seem to a generation steeped in feminist propaganda, the natural economic basis of marriage must also be restored. White men are programmed by evolution to be providers. If you deliberately rearrange society to render this function superfluous, do you have any right to complain when men stop knocking themselves out to perform it?

buttercup #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Being gay is purely a CHOICE. There are those who
thought they were gay (more curiousity) but came out
of it, got married, and lived happily ever after as who
they really are. We can't just believe that whatever
Hollywood does must be right. They started this whole
thing and I think people are just curious and get into
this being gay thing. Some choose to do opposite of
how we were created. God is not pleased as he's
stated in His Word (both in the O.T. and the N.T.) It's
plain it can't be normal. Lots of people are just rebellious
and want tatoos from head to toe and piercings all over
their body. That too is a choice. Dogs do it with the same
sex, and that's where the saying "going to the dogs" came
from.

Anonymous #racist zogsnightmare.com

This dead shitskin Martian luther koon was born Jan 15th, but the traitors decided to make nigger day January 20th, to coincide
with future presidential inaugurations.

We can all forsee the coming media propaganda:
"The first niggerican-american president takes the oath office
on martian luther coon day. It's a great day for America,
a historic day in civil rights..."

The truth:
It will be a horrible day for White America. Chains of slavery, forged by anti-white vermin and white traitors will now be offically placed on all of white America. The master will now be the slave.

our world has turned upsidedown.

If buttercups buzz'd after the bee,
If boats were on land, churches on sea,
If ponies rode men and if grass ate the cows,
And cats should be chased into holes by the mouse,
If the mamas sold their babies
To the gypsies for half a crown;
If summer were spring and the other way round,
Then all the world would be upside down.

This genocidal war to exterminate every facet of White existence is brought to you by our eternal jewish enemies and their kosher conspirators in the Mass media.

The Martian Luther shitskinned holiday was signed into law in 1983 by Republican President Ronald Reagan, of all people. Reagan has provided another extremely obvious example of how the conservatives are just as sold out to the jew as the liberals.

How about a James Earl Ray Day for the great White Patriot
who put a bullet into the carcass of subhuman shitskin King?

Gregory Hood #racist amren.com

White Renegade of the Year — 2019

The White Renegade of the Year is the man who could have done the most good for his people, but instead did the most harm. Charlie Kirk is 2019’s renegade. His organization Turning Point USA could have been a real force for American nationalism, but he has led it up yet another Conservatism Inc. blind alley.

Tuning Point USA’s budget is reportedly over $10 million and may be $20 million in 2020. It boasts over 130,000 members, including high school students, college students, and recent graduates. It has more than 50 chapters. President Trump and his son Donald, Jr. have spoken at its meetings. It is Conservatism Inc.’s youth wing.

And TPUSA is not entirely a sellout caricature. Ann Coulter spoke at its December student leadership conference, where she argued that immigration is the most important issue because it changes everything else. If you support gun rights and oppose socialism, you must limit Third World immigration. Politics is downstream from culture, but culture is downstream from demographics.

Deliberately or not, Miss Coulter was accusing TPUSA of irrelevance, because Turning Point USA has little to say about this critical issue. Its chapter handbook on “activism ideas” doesn’t contain the word “immigration.” The handbook does talk about “affirmative action bake sales,” but even College Republicans have been putting them on for more than decade.

TPUSA opposes affirmative action only because it’s “inadvertent[ly] racist” and another way “big government sucks!” Its handbook lists four different ways to protest “debt,” but President Trump, whom TPUSA claims to love, piled on trillions more in federal debt.

TPUSA is everywhere on social media. Yet memes such as “Let me get this straight: You’re on food stamps but you can afford an iPhone” don’t appeal to young people. Audience surveys show these slogans appeal to older Americans, namely, potential donors.

On his personal Twitter account, Mr. Kirk often blames failing cities on “Democrats” instead of race. Others challenge him to explain well-run Democrat cities (with mostly white populations.) He ignores them.

Turning Point USA is not afraid of race — just white people. This year, the group hosted “leadership summits” for blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and women. Nothing for whites.

Charlie Kirk has debated leftists, despite TPUSA’s memes claiming Communism is racist and murderous. He’ll debate a radical leftist, but not Nick Fuentes.

TPUSA blasts “political correctness” and mocks people who are “offended,” but it enforces political correctness. For example, in June, its “brand ambassador” Ashley St. Clair mocked Donald Trump supporters, immigration restrictionists, and even her own organization. TPUSA did not fire her. However, after she simply appeared in a picture with Nick Fuentes, she was gone. Contempt for President Trump’s supporters is forgivable, but even casual association with the “far right” is not.

In June, Mr. Kirk called America “just a placeholder” for ideas, in contrast to Israel, which is a real nation. Only later — and after much criticism — did he explain his remarks, calling America a “place, a people, a history.”

In recent months, the “Groyper Wars” exposed TPUSA’s hypocrisy. Mr. Kirk is eager to challenge leftists to debate, or at least to dismiss them with a zinger, but he seems to be afraid of nationalists.

In September, Mr. Kirk claimed being American has nothing to do with color or religion, said American identity is an ideology, and called an ethnically homogeneous America “insane.” TPUSA claimed this “DESTROYED” ethno-nationalism.

Two months ago, a young questioner asked whether “American ideals” could survive a non-white majority. Mr. Kirk said it is a “racist ideal” to believe “race and ideology are somehow intertwined together.” He further claimed that “the black community is an inherently conservative community.” Needless to say, blacks are clamoring to vote against President Trump.

After nationalists pressured him, Mr. Kirk claimed he supported cutting legal immigration, but he opposes a moratorium and believes that whites should win over non-white voters to conservative ideals. “His continued refusal to talk about demographics in good faith does little to inspire confidence that his movement has a plan for an American future,” wrote Matthew Boose of American Greatness.

In November, nationalists heckled Mr. Kirk, Donald Trump Jr., and Kimberly Guilfoyle off the stage after they refused to let the audience ask questions at an event. Miss Guilfoyle’s irrelevant and insulting reaction: “I bet you engage and go on online dating because you’re impressing no one here to get a date in person.”

At its most recent conference, TPUSA kicked out Nick Fuentes. The Bulwark, a neoconservative publication, credited TPUSA’s attacks on nationalists with Young Americans for Freedom’s decision to cut ties with Michelle Malkin. I’ve also heard reports — I can’t disclose details — that Mr. Kirk personally called conservative groups, pressuring them to fire people who speak well of Mr. Fuentes or the so-called “Groypers.” Nick Fuentes reports similar tantrums.

Why does this matter? Isn’t this all petty Beltway Right infighting? It’s President Trump who is appointing bad judges and failing his supporters.

The fact is, it’s not about Donald Trump. In 2019, no white advocate or civic nationalist believes President Trump will save us. However, his triumph is slowly changing the GOP into a nationalist party, and without that transformation the Republicans will die. Virginia’s quick shift from red to blue shows that the GOP mustn’t ignore demographic change.

Leading nationalists such as Tucker Carlson, Josh Hawley, Michelle Malkin, and Ann Coulter are doing their best to push America-first policies, but a nationalist movement must be led by young people. Instead of creating new activists, Turning Point USA is exploiting them. It’s funneling would-be nationalists into the same, stale Conservatism Inc. talking points and positions that could lead to disaster in 2020. Instead of attacking political correctness, TPUSA is reinforcing it and purging rightists.

To be fair, Mr. Kirk isn’t anti-white. He’s not a leftist. He’s got a stronger immigration position than most Republicans. His opponents are also our opponents.

But the hour is late, and Charlie Kirk is in the way. He’s built another multimillion-dollar dead end for young Americans. After decades of failure, we can’t afford scams like this. We’re out of time.

The country can’t survive another generation of “conservative leaders” who are terrified of race, demography, and identity. Young Americans, especially whites, don’t need “#BigGovSucks” hashtags. They don’t need more leadership summits for minorities. They don’t need more tributes to Israel.

They need a group that puts America First. They need young people who declare, without apology, not only that It’s OK to Be White, but that it’s OK for America to stay white. They don’t need Charlie Kirk or TPUSA.

Buttercup Dew #fundie mynationalistpony.tumblr.com

Full Nazi

The main reason Bronydom is seen as a ‘gender poison’ to men is because of the surface neoteny, but scratch the pastel exterior and you’ll find a show who’s main themes are social maturity, importance of tradition, family and bravery in keeping civilisation together. Because it is a girl-power show, though, most antagonists are defeated through cooperation and shows of solidarity. In real life, if the women of the Troy rode out to meet those trying to bring down the city walls, they’d be put to the sword. Hence Celestia keeps male royal guards around.. but anyway.

It’s important to remember that most of the foes in MLP are simply Other Ponies, who for whatever reason are prepared to destroy or damage the trust that hold society together for their own ends. This varies between low-level shysterism like Trixie to industrialists like Flim and Flam. Equestria Girls: Rainbow Rocks as well had villains that succeeded mainly through social manipulation and destroying the mutual trust by setting different social types against each other. The central message of the show is that Friendship and trust forged through experience and mutual understanding are paramount in having a livable, sane society. At a very basic level, the ability to trust to a high level those around you is integral to pony (white) society. Trademark show baddies exploit this trust and destroy society n the bargain. Merchant-capitalists Flim & Flam sold gimmicky, useless ‘tonics’, and Trixie paraded as a potential saviour, only to fail miserably when a real threat popped her ego balloon. When these hacks are exposed and you shine the light of truth on them, they scatter like roaches. Trixie & Co are summarily expelled from Ponyville.

In Equestria Girls: Rainbow Rocks, the villains actually succeed. Aside from a far-right conspiracy of Friendship Peddlers, the Dazzlings – An evil trio of malicious spirits – manage to hypnotize the whole of Canterlot High, setting every caste, class and faction within the school against each other using a Battle of the Bands. The crowd broils over into seething resentment, and the Dazzlings take the central spotlight and highest social status by Wow-ing everyone with displays of being the most aloof, the most self-absorbed, the most narcissistic and self important. After all, when all of society is atomised into competing factions, the most logical role model is to be the most sociopathic. Hence the section of Western/White Society that relies most on the aristocracy for its morality – The labouring working classes – Idolise the false gods of the Kardashians, and other vapid, pointless mouthbreathers, who hypnotize the many by being just so Cool, so above those stupid no-good rednecks, like a weeping Caitlyn Jenner receiving an award for battling transphobia-induced PTSD or Obama grieving for one of his many Sons. It’s worth noting that these entertainers pass for ponies, but they’re not really. They’re just devils and monsters passing themselves off as white – Sorry, Canterlot High students – when it suits them.

When there is no common goal and social trust is eroded to the most basic level, the ideological class can take control by peddling false and misleading narratives. Society continues a slow decline into total disintegration, and the hawkers are always there, selling false causes, feel-good balm and a conveniently weak and marginalised enemy to blame – Obviously, those sick and depraved right-wingers and their racism, and 'microaggressions’ round every corner that drive innocent black journalists to shoot down their coworkers.

A consensus on an obviously false ideology – 'We’re all equal!!’ paralyses society as individuals suppress anything that makes them conspicuously different. In 'The Cutie Map’ episodes, Starlight Glimmer takes on this ideological caste. Because ponies are suppressing the natural ways they adapt and help each other by playing to their strengths, in order to appear 'equal’; society begins to predictably spiral into total poverty. Remember kids: Choose equality as your special talent. More builders are men instead of women? Sexist. Not enough dindus in college? Racist. And so on.

Difference and equality are mutually exclusive, as equality means 'the same as.’ Starlight has the answer: If there are problems, the cause is inequality. The solution? More equality. We need more Eritean and Somalian refugees, just to prove how much equality we can have, and we’ll throw those friendship-peddlers in jail for a good measure as well!! We don’t have any cutie-marks of our own, there’s nothing special about us, so who cares if we’re displaced? Of course, bronies went off into a tizzy with this one. They mean Equality, but not our Equality right?! That’s not fair! Gay Marriage! And Stuff!!

Starlight Glimmer achieves her total control of Europe through the Televitz, sorry, Staff of Sameness; through which ponies have their memories of what makes them different to the other peoples of earth stripped from them, leaving them scrabbling miserably by, unable to cooperate, harmonise or build a functioning community with the similarly mezmerised ponies around them. The episode is resolved and modernity is destroyed when Starlight is shown to be just another shyster – somepony who hoodwinked and betrayed her folk in exchange for power. There are many whites like this. No doubt if Starlight was here today, she’d work at the BBC.

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: I fucking hate noodle and currywhores

image

(youknow889)
being an ethnic man in 2019 is life's biggest joke. ALL women prefer white men over their own race. if they can get one they will stop dating their race immediately

Ehh being blacks cool

cope.
only few blacks ascend. most are Humphreys, rare to see Tyrone's.

even that nba bound college basketball player predicted to be the #1 draft pick, Zion, was rejected by an ugly white girl and humiliated all over twitter/news.

(mentalcelthrowaway)
Well buttercup all white men inherently have better personality then any other race so it's just my preference to choose them. Also you are racist for bringing this up in the first place tee hee.

(188cm_lithuanian_orc)
but whites are only like 10% of the World's population. Good luck to Ethnic hoes, but most of them strongly prefer their own kind...

(spacescholar)
Cope was on birthday party of my asian friend he invited a Chad. He and his mom tried to make Chad date his sister they even let those 2 stay in empty room. The next day Chad sended me a screenshot where the girl writes “I am so glad we meet and I am so thankful to God for it”

(rafaelvicuna4)
Remember, in 2019 and above, assume EVERY race of women (even black women) are into white men unless proven otherwise.
To succeed as an ethnic, you literally need to be the best you can, but average whites can still succeed. Dating in the US as an ethnic is hell on earth and an injustice.

(youknow889)
pretty much. second generation ethnic women are the worst. they are pretty much white washed. third, fourth, call themselves american or british, etc. instead of their actual race

David Moncur #conspiracy truthseekers-uk.org

Even more hard to believe is the fact that some people believe that these disguised aliens are amongst us in greater numbers than we ever thought - infiltrating our positions of power. This is not a new theory, in fact in the 1970's colourful characters such as "Valiant Thor" an alien who worked inside the Pentagon were reported in the books like "Stranger at the Pentagon" by Dr Frank Stranges.

One instance of this perhaps happening in the U.K. of which I have heard, came from a friend of mine here in Edinburgh. Although I cannot give his name for personal security reasons I am convinced by what he has seen and shown me that he was a former, very highly placed, British Secret Service agent. One of his duties involved a detachment under Margaret Thatcher. She amongst many other things used to shout at him to get various telex messages done. He was also present with Mrs Thatcher and remembers seeing her going "bonkers" just after being informed of the sinking of the Belgrano.

I asked this friend, what would you say was the heaviest state secret he had to keep? Strangely he replied that "The heaviest state secret I had to know was that the Duke of Edinburgh is not a human being. He's an extra-terrestrial agent of the Markab confederacy of planets. Margaret Thatcher also knew that two members of the House of Commons were also not human beings." Quite a strange story, but coming from somebody so highly placed?

American Ufologist and former S.H.A.P.E. (Supreme Headquarters of Allied Powers in Europe) officer Robert Dean was partial to the secrets of aliens through his contact with a Top Secret assessment document of the whole UFO situation called "The Assessment". Dean also tells of the incredible government paranoia regarding non humans being present in sensitive positions and being undetectable.

Buttercup Dew #racist mynationalistpony.tumblr.com

[pinstripehourglass: You're gay? Seriously? You're a gay white nationalist? Here's a tip, pal: if the people you're backing get in power, shit's not gonna go great for the queers. White nationalists have a pretty damn spotty track record for sexual liberty.]

Hi Pinstripe. I find the only people in favour of “sexual liberty” tend to be Vegan glitter faggots I have nothing in common with.

I am for the cultural recognition that the “Anything is fine as long as it’s consensual” dogma is destructive and absurd on its face given that women have a pretty damn spotty track record of being consistent about what’s consensual or not, and the establishment is hellbent on re-defining any sex whatsoever as some kind of misogynistic abuse.

Besides, my blog doesn’t focus exclusively on white nationalism, it outlines the principles of nationalism in general that apply universally to any population of biologically similar humans.

Here’s a tip, buddy: Don’t pick on Buttercup, because Buttercup don’t lose. Fuck the queers, I ain’t one of them and my sexual preference for men is incidental and trivial next to my status as a radical traditionalist.

I have literally nothing in common with the entire LGBT society and would quite happily see the political activist half up against a wall, and the communist sympathetic half up against the other side of that wall. My people are right wingers who are frequently homosexual by incidence, a trend and tradition that extends further than you think.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

Because the Island of Greenland is geographically shaped like the head of a bear, wolf or fox, its silhouette appears to only have one eye. . This shape is coincidentally replicated in the shape of southern Texas with Austin, Texas, representing the eye of the bear. The single eye is symbolic of the blindness that Greenland suffers for it is cut-off from the underworld, relying completely on the CIA of Switzerland for its survival. The one-eyed Beast of Greenland is most commonly depicted as the Eye of Providence (i.e., the All-Seeing Eye of G.O.D., otherwise known as Greenland of Denmark). The Eye of Providence and the Bear of Greenland is coincidentally found on the flag of Šiauliai, the fourth largest city in Lithuania. In Norse Mythology, the god of Odin, who coincidentally only has one eye, goes by the name of “Battle Wolf” and “Bear”, both tributes to Greenland. The Biblical “Number of the Beast” (i.e., 666) also appears to be a direct reference to Greenland as the Holy Bible is the allegorical and metaphorical history book of the Greco-Roman Empire. The term “Beast” (B+S+T) was evidently derived from the term “Best” (B+S+T) which is why Greenland was chosen as the home of the Greco-Roman Empire. The Mesopotamian god Ugallu, is known as the “Big Weather-Beast”, for the “Ugallu” (G+L) acronymically equates to Greenland. Lastly, in Disney’s Monsters, Inc., the character known as "Mike Wazowski" is depicted as a one-eyed green monster, a modern tribute to the Beast of Greenland.

Bear of Greenland
The term “Bear” (B+R) is constructed by the acronyms of “Babylon” and “Rome”, the former capital city and name of the Greco-Roman Empire. Since Greenland resides above or over the Earth (i.e., in heaven), the German word “über” (B+R) translates to “above”, “over” and “across”. The Bear of Greenland is flanked by Bermuda Triangle in the Atlantic Ocean and the Bering Strait in the Pacific Ocean. Boreas (B+R+S), meaning "Devouring One", was the Greek god of the cold north wind, Aurora, was the Roman goddess of the dawn. Consequently, the Arora Borealis (B+R+L+S) are the Northern Lights which shine upon the Bear of Greenland. Aside from the god of Odin who goes by “Bear”, Búri (B+R) was the first Norse god in Norse mythology who became the father of the other gods, including Borr (B+R), a god who had three sons, Odin, Vili and Vé. The names of these metaphorical sons are deciphered as follows: “Odin” (D+N) represents the third and final den (home) of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland; “Vili” (V+L) represents the veil of secrecy which allows the Roman Empire to thrive unabated in Greenland, until now; and “Vé” (V) is an acronym for Victoria, the Roman goddess of victory. Lastly, Britannia (B+R+T+N) the female personification of England, while Hibernia (H+B+R+N) the female personification of Ireland, both of which have the “Bear” (B+R) of Greenland within their respective names.

Den of Greenland
Because a bear, wolfs or fox must have a den to live in, the term “Den” (D+N) has become synonymous with Greenland. Since the Romans were the first to invent gunpowder and “Dynamite” (D+N+M+T), it was give the name of “Den Might” for it represented the power of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland. Tributes to the “Den” of Greenland are found throughout popular culture, including but not limited to: Business: Denny’s; Denner; Celebrities: Dan Rather; Harry Houdini; James Dean; John Madden; Joe Biden, Madonna; Michael Jordan; and Princess Diana; Culture: “Danny Boy”; Mythology: Odin, a god in Norse Mythology; Tuesday: Middle Low German (Dingesdag); German (Dienstag); Dutch (dinsdag); Afrikaans (Dinsdag); Thursday: Proto Germanic (Þunras dagaz); Old English (Þunresdæg); Old High German (Donarestag); Middle Low German (Donersdag); German (Donnerstag); Dutch (donderdag); Afrikaans (Donderdag); Wednesday: Proto Germanic (Wodanas dagaz); Old English (Wodnesdæg); Old Saxon (Wôdanesdag); Old High German (Wôdanstag/Wuotanstag); Middle Low German (Wodenesdag); Scottish (Wadensday); and Words: condone; Dan; Danish; dance; dandelion; dawn; dean; den; dentist; Dianetics; dine; dinner; dinosaur; don; done; donate; done; donner kebap; don’t; dune; dynamic; dynasty; dynamite; and Great Dane.

The Borg
The “Borg” of Star Trek are an allegorical metaphor for the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland which rules the world via the Babylon System. The Borg refers to a fictional alien race that appears as recurring antagonists within the Star Trek franchise. The Borg is a species that have been turned into cybernetic organisms functioning as drones of the Collective, or the hive. The Borg force other species into their collective and connect them to "the hive mind", an act called assimilation. Similar to fascism, this process entails violence, abductions, and injections of cybernetic implants. The Borg are infamous for their phrase, "You will be assimilated". This mantra is evident today as all those who do not assimilate into the capitalistic Babylon System are ultimately destroyed, economically or physically.

Wolf of Greenland
Because Greenland is geographically shaped like the head of a wolf, numerous references to wolfs are found through mythology and popular culture. The term “M. canina” meaning “werewolf”, is a mythological human who has the ability to shapeshift into a wolf or a wolf-like creature, either purposely or after being placed under a curse. The term “canina” is a direct reference to Canaan (i.e., Greenland), home of the werewolf. “The Boy Who Cried Wolf” is one of Aesop's Fables where the idiom to "cry wolf", meaning to give a false alarm, was ultimately derived from. To “cry wolf” was likely derived in respect to attacks emanating from Greenland (e.g., Greco-Roman Vikings). Another idiom “keep the wolf from the door” was also likely derived in respect to the Wolf of Greenland. In the language of German, the number “12” is pronounced “zwölf” which equates to “Zion Wolf”, a reference to Mt. Zion in Greenland. The book "Little Red Riding Hood" is a European fairy tale about a young girl and a Big Bad Wolf, a metaphor for Greenland. The story revolves around a girl called Little Red Riding Hood (i.e., the Roman Empire), after the red hooded cape and cloak that she wears. Lastly, Beowulf is an Old English heroic epic poem set in Scandinavia which is commonly cited as one of the most important works of Anglo-Saxon literature.

Bear in Popular Culture
Tributes to the Bear of Greenland, the term “Bear”, or terms containing the consonants of “B” and “R” (e.g., beer) are found throughout popular culture, including but not limited to: Athletes: Charles Barkley (NBA); Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (NBA); Kobe Bryant (NBA); Larry Bird (NBA); LeBron James (NBA); and Tom Brady (NFL); Calendar: month of February; month of September; month of October; month of November; and month of December; Celebrities: Brad Pitt; Bruno Mars; Julia Roberts; Justin Bieber; Justin Timberlake; Mark Wahlberg; Pierce Brosnan; Robert DeNiro; Robert Pattinson; and Steven Spielberg; Coaches: Bear Bryant; and Vince Lombardi, for which the Super Bowl Trophy is named after; Computing: Cyber-attacks, digital attacks that can be launched from anywhere in the world; Corporations: Barclays; Bayer; Behr; Blackberry; Braun; Bridgestone; Brinks; Burberry; Burger King; Burlington Northern; Burton; Halliburton; KBR; Lamborghini; Marlboro; Subaru; and Julius Bar; Cities: Barcelona, Spain; Beirut, Lebanon; Berkeley, California; Berlin, Germany; Bern, Switzerland; Birmingham, Alabama; Birmingham, England; Bristol, Connecticut; Brooklyn, New York; Burbank, California; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Culture: “White man’s burden”; Financial Markets: Barrel of oil; Bear Market; Gold bar; Stock broker; Inventors: Albert Einstein; and Johan Guttenberg; Legal: Bar Association; Mascots: Baylor University Bears; Brown University Bears; the Chicago Bears; the Chicago Cubs; the Memphis Grizzlies; Mercer University Bears; Missouri State University Bears; Morgan State University Bears; Oakland University Golden Grizzlies; University of California at Berkeley Golden Bears; University of Northern Colorado Bears; University of Maine Black Bears; and University of Montana Grizzlies; Military: Ft. Bragg; Green Berets are worn by special forces military in the Australian, French and Dutch commandos, as well as the United States Army Special Forces; Places: Bahrain; Barbados; Bering Strait; Bermuda; Bermuda Triangle; Bora Bora; Bourbon Street; Brazil; Brunei; Burkina Faso; Burma; Burundi; Great Britain; Liberia; Luxembourg; Nebraska; and Siberia; Politicians: Barack Obama (President of the U.S.); Ehud Barak (Prime Minister of Israel); Gordon Brown (UK Prime Minister); John O. Brennan (Director of CIA); and Silvio Berlusconi (Prime Minister of Italy); Politics: Brady Bill (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act); the 2nd Amendment and the “Right to keep and bear arms”; Religion: Abraham, founding father or Israel; Barabbas; Bartholomew; Bereishit, the first book in the Jewish Bible; Sports Franchises: Atlanta Braves; FC Bayern Munich; and FC Barcelona; Toys: Care Bears; and teddy bear; Television: The Borg of Star Trek; Television Anchors: Brian Williams (NBC); Chris Berman (ESPN); and Tom Brokaw (NBC); Witchcraft: Abracadabra, an incantation used as a magic word in stage magic tricks; and Words: aberration; abortion; abroad; algebra; amber; Amber Alert; Aurora Borealis; bar; barb; barb wire; barber; bare; bare foot; bargain; barge; bark; barn; baron; barracuda; bear, bear arms; bear down; beard; beer; beret hat; berries; berry, bird; birth; birthday; board; border; bore; boring; born; borrow; bourbon; bra; brace; brackets; Braham Bull; braid; brail; bran; branch; brand; brand new; brandy; brass; brat; brave; brawl; brawn, BRB; breach; break; breakfast; breast; breath; bread; breed; brew; briar; bridge; brie cheese; brief; bright; bring; brink; britches; broccoli; broil; bronze; broom; brother; brow; brown; brunch; brush; brutal; bur; bureau; bureaucracy; burgundy; burglar; burka; burn; burrito; caliber; candy bar; celebrate; cyber; embarrassed; eye brow; labor; laboratory; liberty; library; lumbar; neighbor; number; robbery; rubber; side burns; somber; starboard; and suburban.

Wolf Mascots
Mascot-related tributes to the Wolf of Greenland are found throughout the world, including but are not limited to: Australia: Brisbane Wolves FC, a soccer team; South Coast Wolves Football Club, or "Wollongong Wolves," a football team; Western Wolves FC, a football team; and Windsor Wolves, a rugby team; Belgium: La Louvière Wolves, an American football team; Canada: Akwesasne Wolves, a hockey team; La Tuque Wolves, a hockey team; Ottawa Wolves RFC, a rugby team; Ripley Wolves, a hockey team; Shelburne Wolves, a hockey team; St. Catharines Wolves, a soccer team; Sudbury Wolves, a team in the Ontario Hockey League; Sudbury Jr. Wolves, a team in the Northern Ontario Junior Hockey League; and Sudbury Wolves (EPHL), a defunct team in the Eastern Professional Hockey League; England: Walthamstow Wolves, a speedway team; Warrington Wolves, a rugby league team; Wolverhampton Wanderers F.C., a football team commonly known as "Wolves"; and Worcester Wolves, a basketball team; Indonesia: Tangerang Wolves FC, a football team; Ireland: Dublin Wolves, an ice hockey team; Nigeria: Warri Wolves F.C., a soccer team; Pakistan: Faisalabad Wolves, a cricket team; Scotland: Edinburgh Wolves, a Scottish American Football team; Sri Lanka: Wayamba Wolves, a cricket team; Switzerland: EHL Wolves, a Swiss ice hockey team; and the United States: American Wolves, a wrestling team; Chicago Wolves, a minor league ice hockey team; Carolina Raging Wolves, a football team; Connecticut Wolves, a hockey team; Detroit Wolves, a baseball team; Idaho Wolves, a soccer team; Los Angeles Wolves, a former professional soccer team; Manchester Wolves, a minor league arena football team; Minnesota Timberwolves, an NBA basketball team; North Carolina State University Wolfpack, sports teams of North Carolina State University; Stockton Wolves, an arena football team; Stony Brook University Seawolves, sports teams of Stony Brook University; University of Nevada Wolf Pack, sports teams of University of Nevada; and the Wisconsin Wolves, a football team.

One-Eyed Creatures
There are at least 65 one-eyed creatures in mythology, religion and fiction, all tribute to the one-eyed Beast of Greenland. These include but are not limited to: Agent Pleakley: Agent Pleakley, a one-eyed creature in in the film “Lilo & Stitch” (2002); Ahgg: Ahgg, the witches' giant spider with one eye in the center of his forehead in “My Little Pony: The Movie” (1986); Ahriman: Ahriman, a species of monster from the Japanese role-playing game series "Final Fantasy" (1987); Alpha Centauri: Alpha Centauri, green hermaphrodite hexapod with one huge eye in the “Doctor Who” episode "The Curse of Peladon" (1972); Arimaspi: Arimaspi or Arimaspoi, a legendary people of northern Scythia that were "always at war with their neighbors" and stealing gold from griffins. They had a single eye in the center of the forehead; Balor: Balor, a figure from Irish mythology who was known for his evil eye that could kill just by looking at you. It was prophesied that he would be killed by his grandson, so he attempted to murder his grandchildren; Basilisk: Basilisk, large one-eyed mutant in Marvel Comics' “New X-Men” (2004-2008); Big Billy: Big Billy, a one-eyed creature in “The PowerPuff Girls” (1998-2005) episode entitled "School House Rocked"; Big Dan T.: Big Dan T., a character in the Coen Brothers film “O Brother, Where Art Thou” (2000), who is intended to emulate the Cyclops from Homer's "Odyssey; B.O.B.: B.O.B. (Bicarbonate Ostylezene Benzoate), gelatinous one-eyed creature in “Monsters vs. Aliens” (2009); Bongo Bongo: Bongo Bongo, a one-eyed creature from the “Legend of Zelda” (1986-2014); Cyclops: Cyclops, a race of giants in Greek and Roman mythology, including Polyphemus. They had a single eye in the center of the forehead; Cyclops, one-eyed creatures in monsters in the popular Japanese role-playing game series "Dragon Quest" (1986); Cyclops, one-eyed creatures in the film “The 7th Voyage of Sinbad” (1958); Cyclops, one-eyed creatures in the role-playing game “Dungeons and Dragons” (1974-Present); and Cyclops, Tyson, Percy Jackson's one-eyed half-brother in “Percy Jackson and the Olympians” (2005-2009); Cyclopskin: Cyclopskin, one-eyed creatures in the role-playing game “Dungeons and Dragons” (1974-Present); Cylon Centurions: Cylon Centurions, one-eyed creatures in the sci-fi franchise “Battlestar Galactica” (1978); Dajjal: Dajjal, the anti-Christ in the Islamic religion that only has one eye; Dalek Sec: Dalek Sec, monster that became a one-eyed Dalek-human hybrid in “Doctor Who” (1963-1989); Darklops Zero: Darklops Zero, prototype of Darklops in the film “Ultraman Zero: The Revenge of Belial” (2010); Draken: Draken, a one-eyed sea monster in animated series “Jumanji (1996-1999); Drethdock: Drethdock, a one-eyed creature from the Sega Saturn game “Battle Monsters” (1995); Dusclops: Dusclops, a one-eyed ghost in Pokémon (1996-Present); Dusknoir: Dusknoir, a one-eyed ghost in Pokémon (1996-Present); Duskull: Duskull, a one-eyed ghost in Pokémon (1996-Present); Evil Eye: Evil Eye, a one-eyed monster in the online RPG “MapleStory” (2003); Gohma: Gohma, a one-eyed creature from the “Legend of Zelda” (1986-2014); Graeae: The Graeae, three witches (or sisters) that shared one eye and one tooth between them; Hagen: Hagen or Högni, a Burgundian warrior in German and Norse legend that is depicted in some accounts as having only one eye; Hitotsume-kozo: Hitotsume-kozo, monsters (obake) in Japanese folklore. They had a single giant eye in the center of their face; Imbra: Imbra, a one-eyed idol and the highest god of Kafiristan in the novella “The Man Who Would Be King” (1888); Jian: Jian, a bird in Chinese mythology with only one eye and one wing. A pair of such birds were dependent on each other and inseparable; Kabandha: Kabandha, a demon with no head, no neck, one large eye on the breast, and a mouth on the stomach. Kabandha appears in Hindu mythology as a character of Ramayana; Kang and Kodos: Kang and Kodos, a recurring one-eyed alien duo in the “The Simpsons” (1989-Present); Kerack: Kerack, alien race resembling large one-eyed prawns in novel “Camelot 30K” (1983); Leela: Leela, a one-eyed mutant character in the animated series “Futurama” (1999-2013); Likho: Likho, a one-eyed creature that’s the embodiment of evil fate and misfortune in Slavic mythology; Mike Wazowski: Mike Wazowski, round monster with one large eye in the film “Monsters, Inc.” (2001); Minions: Minions, one-eyed comic henchmen in the animation “Despicable Me” (2010); Monoids: Monoids, a one-eyed alien race in the “Doctor Who” episode "The Ark" (1966); Morris: Morris, a one-eyed mutant character in the animated series “Futurama” (1999-2013); Munda: Munda, a one-eyed mutant character in the animated series “Futurama” (1999-2013); Muno: Muno, a one-eyed creature in the children's television series “Yo Gabba Gabba!” (2007-Present); Naga: Naga, a one-eyed mutant in the film “World Without End” (1956); Ojáncanu: Ojáncanu, a one-eyed giant with long beard and red hair of Cantabrian mythology who embodies evil, cruelty and brutality; One-Eye: One-Eye, one of three sisters in the Brothers Grimm fairy tale "One-Eye, Two-Eyes, and Three-Eyes" (c. 1889); One-Eyed: One-Eyed, starfish-shaped aliens from the planet Paira in the “Warning from Space” (1956); One-Eyed Monster: One-Eyed Monster, the antagonist in the film “One-Eyed Monster” (2008); Orb: Orb, a one-eyed Marvel Comics super-villain, the primary adversary of Ghost Rider; Psoglav: Psoglav, a one-eyed dog-headed monster in Serbian mythology; Purple People Eater: Purple People Eater, a one-eyed creature in the song “Purple People Eater” (1958); Ravage: Ravage, a one-eyed panther-like Decepticon in the film “Revenge of the Fallen” (2009); Sauron: Sauron, the eponymous arch-villain of “The Lord of the Rings” (1954-1955), often manifests as 'the Eye' in Peter Jackson's adaptations of Tolkien's work; Scaroth: Scaroth, a one-eyed time-travelling alien in the “Doctor Who” episode “City of Death” (1979); Sgt. Psyclopps: Sgt. Psyclopps, the one-eyed guitarist for the costumed comedy punk band The Radioactive Chicken Heads; Sheldon Plankton: Sheldon Plankton, a one-eyed creature in “SpongeBob SquarePants” (1999-Present); Shuma-Gorath: Shuma-Gorath, a giant eye with tentacles, in the Marvel comics universe; Starro the Conqueror: Starro the Conqueror, a one-eyed supervillain in DC Comics; Suezo: Suezo, a one-eyed, one-footed breed of monster in video game/anime series “Monster Rancher” (1997); Tepegoz: Tepegoz, a one-eyed ogre in Oghuz Turkish epic Book of Dede Korkut; The Wicked Witch of the West: The Wicked Witch of the West, a one-eyed witch from "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz" (1900); Vaati: Vaati, a one-eyed creature from the “Legend of Zelda” (1986-2014); Waddle Doo: Waddle Doo, a one-eyed creature from Nintendo game franchise “Kirby” (1992-2014); Wenlock and Mandeville: Wenlock and Mandeville, the one-eyed mascot from the London 2012 Olympics; Zargon: Zargon, a giant one-eyed monster in the role-playing game “Dungeons & Dragons” (1974-Present); and Zatar the Alien: Zatar the Alien, a one-eyed green alien in the MTV series “Celebrity Deathmatch” (1998-2007).

Fox of Greenland
Because Greenland is geographically shaped like the head of a fox, numerous references to foxes are found through mythology and popular culture. The word “Fox” (F+X) acronymically and/or consonantly equates to “Double Cross North” or “Pi kills” as Pi is an acronym for Greenland. The idiom “sly as a fox” is indicative of the Greenland’s behavior while the term “fix” is slang for “fox”, meaning to make right, firm, stable, or stationary. Corporate entities (e.g., 20th Century Fox, Firefox, Fox News Channel, and FX) as well as films such as Disney’s “The Fox and the Hound” (1981) all contain fox-related titles and imagery. Interestingly, a white fox is depicted in the coat of arms of the Northwest Territories of Canada which border Greenland.

Angela Kaaihue #fundie patheos.com

Earlier this month, Angela Kaaihue won the Republican Party nomination for the U.S. congressional seat representing Hawaii’s 2nd District. She beat her closest Republican rival by six points.

Kaaihue is a big supporter of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, with whom she has a great deal in common. Like Donald Trump, she’s an erratic bigot and a litigious bundle of grievances. Like Trump, she appears to lack any discernible political ideology or convictions, and seems to have entered politics mainly as a way to address personal grudges and the seething resentment that gnaws at her day and night.

Angela Kaaihue has chosen, like Donald Trump, to go full Breitbart, hoping to make up for her lack of widespread appeal through sheer outrageousness.
Kaaihue is good at sheer outrageousness because, like Donald Trump, she’s full-gonzo bonkers. This image, for example, is taken from an ALL CAPS post on Kaaihue’s candidate blog, “Hawaii’s Holy War 2016“:

image

For the record, the Antichrist, in Kaaihue’s opinion, is “CHRISTIANS TEARING DOWN CHRISTIANS.” This was Kaaihue’s first blog post following her Republican primary win.
But while Kaaihue has little patience for CHRISTIANS TEARING DOWN CHRISTIANS, she reserves most of her wrath for those she hates most of all: The Japanese. And also Hindus and Buddhists, but mostly the Japanese.
Confronted about her enthusiastically anti-Japanese Facebook post — which began, “F–k you J–s!! F–k you f–king J–s!! I hate you you f–king J–s! Go to Hell you f–king J–s!! F–k you you stupid f–king J–s!!” and then, believe it or not, went downhill from there — Kaaihue responded with an August 21 press release reading, in part:

"U.S. Congressional GOP Nominee and Candidate Angela Kaaihue responds back to HAWAII’s citizens rude, defamatory, ignorant remarks made to her through social media. She states, “Repent and ask God for forgiveness!”
It’s a shame HAWAII NEWS MEDIA uses Japanese reporters to report the racist bigot remarks towards Japanese people made by U.S. Candidate Angela Kaaihue.
HAWAII NEWS MEDIA is disservicing Hawaii’s people by NOT investigating WHY and HOW a locally raised woman of Hawaii, grew up and lived in Hawaii all of her life, grew to HATE the Japanese so much."

And it has all proved to be a bit too much for Republican Party officials in Hawaii, who are now denouncing their nominee in no uncertain terms, as Chad Blair reports for Honolulu Civil Beat:

“I want it understood by the general public and the media that the recent inflammatory comments made by candidate for Congress (CD2) Angela Kaaihue do not represent the views, values, or the sentiments of our Party and its members,” Fritz Rohlfing said in a statement issued late Friday. “Her vulgar, racially-bigoted, and religiously-intolerant descriptions of Democratic Party candidates are offensive, shameful, and unacceptable in public discourse.”
Rohlfing added, “I unconditionally denounce her despicable statements.”

Reached by phone Saturday, Kaaihue criticized Rohlfing for leading a “disenfranchised party” and suggested Rohfing had “slammed” her for her religious views.
“I am talking about God, preaching about God, restoring his kingdom back into Hawaii,” she said. “This is God’s country, America is God’s country. I am trying to educate people about that.”
Kaaihue said there was a war going on between “the righteous and the unrighteous, between God and Satan.” Rohfing’s denouncement of her candidacy, she suggested, demonstrated “how we are being deceived by Satan, the biggest liar and deceiver.”
She said Rohlfing needed to “be careful” because he was taking on “the messenger of God.”
“‘Angela’ means messenger of God,” she said. “My whole family is Christian.”

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

I am not disowning my fellow alt rightists who happen to be nazis. I am inviting them to become better friends and allies than they already are by discarding their blue pill illusions about women – by becoming even more evil than they already are.

Progs tell me that Andrew Anglin is the leading force for Nazism in the America, and have forced him to flee to Nigeria, where the locals do not see anything odd, evil, surprising, or unusual, about a white advocating for the interests of whites, or the interests of those whites ethnically similar to himself. Doesn’t everyone do that? Nigerians are too busy hating Nigerians who are a different breed of black to themselves to worry about whites.

My problem with Andrew Angelin is that if he is the leading force, progs don’t have much to worry about. This a man who thinks that twelve year old girls would be pure and chaste if it was not for evil males preying upon them.

He tells us that the problems we have with women are due to evil Jewish mind rays. If it was not for those damned Jews, women would never give us such tough shit tests. This is the sort of thinking that led to Hitler having only moderate success in raising the German birthrate.

The trouble with Nazis is that they leftists stuck in the 1930s, while the rest of the left has moved even further left. And the left was mighty bluepilled back in the 1930s.

His truly impressive loli collection suggests to me a man who does not score a whole lot of real life women, though I would guess he does considerably better than Scott Alexander.

There is a man in urgent need of the red pill.

The trouble with blaming everything on Jews is not that it is unkind to Jews. Unkind to Jews is not my problem. I will let Jews worry about that. The problem with blaming everything on Jews is that it leads to the conclusion that 1930s leftism, leftism before we let the Jews into the left wing club, was just fine. And Andrew Anglin’s truly impressive loli collection is where that thinking gets you.

In fact, things started going bad early in the nineteenth century, when frothing at the mouth biting mad feminism gave us a marriage contract that was enforced on men, but not on women, resulting in the collapse of the family.

And, shortly after that, white man’s burden, with the corresponding attacks on unit cohesion and military discipline, with the result that inferior races started to defeat whites in 1841, and have been defeating us militarily worse and worse ever since.

That is when things went to hell – when marriage was successfully attacked by those holier than thou, when our military was successfully attacked by those holier than thou. Rolling things back to the 1930s is not going to help. We need to roll things back to the 1730s.

Yes, Jews have always been subversive, and they were subversive back in the 1730s also. But I am pretty sure it was not Jews that caused everything except science to turn to shit in the nineteenth century, and it was not Jews that caused science to turn to shit in the twentieth. What happened to science after World War II was plainly the result of Harvard strong arming the Royal Society. Andrew is blaming the flies for the condition of a corpse that has a bullet hole in the head. It is not that I support flies, it is that I oppose being shot in the head.

There is a correlation between flies and corpses, but Nazis have the causation backwards.

Senator Mike Lee (R) #fundie wonkette.com

Remember "The West Wing"? Aaron Sorkin put a lot of effort into depicting Republicans -- okay, probably just Alan Alda -- as serious-minded, ethical mammals who just had a difference of opinion with the Democratic protagonists. It turns out "The West Wing" was as realistic as "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." That's because too many Republicans are like Mike Lee. The Utah Senator more closely resembles a character from a bad USA comedy series.

Republicans are holding a procedural vote today on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal. Lee took to the Senate floor to tell us how terrible it is. He could have done this with facts and data. Instead, he went with Ronald Reagan and a velociraptor.

LEE: This is, of course, a picture of former President Ronald Reagan, naturally firing a machine gun while riding on the back of a dinosaur. You'll notice a couple of important features here.

Oh, sweet Christ! What the hell is he talking about? He even had some poor staffer cart out out the Reagan dinosaur picture. How is this even relevant? Is he trying to sell us the painting? Is this a damn infomercial? Lee goes on to describe the "stirring, unmistakable patriotism" of the velociraptor "holding up a tattered, American flag."

Presumably, Lee believes the Green New Deal is so absurd and ridiculous, it is not worthy of serious debate. This is beneath the dignity of a senator, which is saying something. Lee would probably not appreciate having his own beliefs held up for public ridicule.

Republicans have resorted to some childish and petty displays recently. There was the "liar, liar, pants on fire" visual aid during the Michael Cohen hearings. New Hampshire Republicans wore pearls a few weeks ago to mock women advocating for sensible gun laws. However, Lee seemed positively unhinged. Just straight-up bonkers. All because Ocasio-Cortez and other Democrats think we should consider doing something serious about the growing threat from climate change.

LEE: The solution to climate change is not this unserious resolution ...the solution to so many of our problems at all times and in all places is to fall in love, get married, and have some kids.

Yeah, that's what he said -- using his words and mouth organ. We don't know why he chose to address climate change that way Prince flippantly addressed the "Sign o' the Times": "Let's fall in love, get married, have a baby. We'll call him Nate. If he's a boy."

Lee believes more babies are the "solution" to climate change. Are they supposed to keep the oceans from rising? They can't even sit up or change themselves. The fool acts like he's appearing in some Kirk Cameron fundamentalist flick: "The courage needed to solve climate change is nothing compared with the courage needed to start a family." Seriously, that means nothing. Everything he just said was bullshit.

Does Lee really think we're so dumb that all this treacle about babies and families will distract us from doing anything to make sure there's an actual future for our own children and families? Suggesting we just fuck while the world burns is again literally a Prince song but as much as we love the brother, it's not viable environmental policy.

It should surprise no one that Ocasio-Cortez instantly owned Lee in seconds flat.

Like many other women + working people, I occasionally
suffer from impostor syndrome: those small moments, especially
on hard days, where you wonder if the haters are right.

But then they do things like this to clear it right up.

If this guy can be Senator, you can do anything.

This is a political master stroke: In a single tweet, Ocasio-Cortez demonstrates a humility that any American can recognize and appreciate. She also shows a wisdom and maturity that casts a brutal spotlight on Lee's arrogance and dismissiveness. We don't claim there are no reasonable arguments against the Green New Deal, but Republicans should at least have the decency to try to come up with one. The more they lie about the program and try to shame it like a bullied school kid, the more pathetic they all look.

Selwyn Duke and J. Christian Adams #conspiracy thenewamerican.com

[All formatting from the original source]

It’s not enough that American academia has been indoctrinating native-born youth with leftism, reinforced by the media and entertainment. Nor is it sufficient that our immigration regime has, since 1965, ensured that 85 percent of our immigrants would come from the Third World and Asia, bringing us people who vote overwhelmingly Democrat upon being naturalized. Barack Obama promised “fundamental change.”

And fundamental change he will deliver — fast — by hook or by crook.

So says J. Christian Adams, a former Department of Justice attorney and whistleblower, claiming that the effort to fast-track illegal aliens to voter status is already underway.

[...]

Adams also writes that “PJ Media has obtained an internal ‘Dear Colleague’ letter written by Leon Rodriguez, the ‘director and co-chair of the Task Force on New Americans,’” that refers to a White House report called “‘Strengthening Communities by Welcoming All Residents’” and states, “This report outlines an immigrant integration plan that will … ensure that the people who live in this country can fully participate in their communities.”

Adams, who worked voting-rights cases while at the DOJ, then points out that “‘full participation’ is a term commonly used to include voting rights.” He then says that in order to achieve this “participation,” the DHS — which ostensibly was created to increase our country’s security — has been mounting a full-court press to grant citizenship to as many aliens as possible before next November’s election. As Adams puts it, “Multiple sources at DHS confirm that political appointees are prioritizing naturalization ahead of the 2016 presidential election.”

Adams also reports that groups such as La Raza (Spanish for “The Race”) and the American Immigration Lawyers Association have been helping forge Obama administration immigration policy. Moreover, he relates that an anonymous DHS official told him that DHS “intends to ‘recapture’ ‘unused’ visas from years past to grant more visas and LPR [green card] status.” In other words, if you’re a warm body (and sometimes cold will do) with socialist leanings, Uncle Sam wants you.

And now that this demographic-warfare tactic has brought America to a tipping point, leftists are becoming more forthcoming about their aims and rightists are finally waking up. As the Daily Caller put it in a February title, Obama is “‘Hopeful’ Immigration Will Drown Conservatism”; and WND.com recently reported, “Expected surge of immigrants to push U.S. to 'European model of state control.’”

[...]

This explains why the Obama administration has been feverishly shipping illegal migrants to various communities nationwide. Note that this isn’t unprecedented, as Marxist governments did precisely the same thing, transferring populations and intermixing religious and ethnic groups. It’s the divide-and-conquer strategy: Sufficiently break down an area’s cohesiveness — create division with “diversity” — and it’s unlikely it will be able to successfully rebel against the central government.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

I HATE UNRIGHTEOUSNESS! Psalms 97:10a, “Ye that love the LORD, hate evil: he preserveth the souls of his saints; he delivereth them out of the hand of the wicked.” Christian women ought to absolute HATE women wearing pants, but instead THEY WEAR THEM!!! Thanks a lot all you irresponsible females who make it harder for us men to live right! America's crazy laws protect evildoers. Every time I hear of horrifying crimes in the news, I have difficulty feeling any sympathy for Americans, because we have done this to ourselves! As long as we deprive impressionable children of the Holy Bible, and instead we indoctrinate them with the blatant lies and science-fiction of Evolution, all manner of crime will continue and escalate until we completely destroy ourselves.

Christians are far too complacent in this generation. The churches don't care and have become indifferent, because everything is about prioritizing money these days! I am so sick and tired of hearing deadbeat pastors say they're trying to “build a work,” as a lame excuse to shut me up about what's wrong with the modern corrupt Bible versions. They view me as a threat, a trouble-maker who causes controversies and might cause a church split. God pity that ungodly and disgraceful type of completely overpaid pastor! Pensacola Christian College (PCC) wants to build a little religious center on Guam, but they don't care about THE TRUTH!!! Don't even get me started on today's horrible pastors! I love pastors, if they are Bible-preachers! But how can you preach the inspired Word of God if you cannot even discern which Bible God wrote, amongst hundreds of English Bible versions available today? Duh, gee, let me figure this out... Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe! I actually heard a local Baptist pastor on Guam say publicly from his pulpit that he wasn't surfing the internet during church, he was searching through different versions of the Bible to prepare his sermon. Goodnight in the morning! That is the poor quality of church pastors today... Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe! But I'm the bad guy according to their church staff, because I actually think GOD AUTHORED JUST ONE BOOK, and that we have it in the inspired King James Bible. Whose bonkers? Pastors gone wild!

I could write a volume of books on this topic. We've let the Devil take control over our lives in America. I don't care how sheltered a life you try to live, you cannot escape the insanity of this generation! The apostle Paul said because of the fierce and deadly persecution against the New Testament Church, he thought it was a good idea to avoid getting married. 1st Corinthians 7:25-26, “Now concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord: yet I give my judgment, as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful. I suppose therefore that this is good for the present distress, I say, that it is good for a man so to be.” I'm starting to feel that way in our messed-up American culture today, where WOMEN HAVE GONE BONKERS, all manner of wickedness is now legal, and hatred and persecution against God-fearing, godly, Christ-honoring, Christians is quickly growing. Beam me up Scotty?

If you are a sweet, kind, sincere, pure of heart, responsible, appreciative, submissive, God-fearing, loyal woman, then I am not talking about you, so please don't be offended. And if you are fairly attractive, and single, I am looking for a wife. = -)

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

MORE ABOUT THE PLANETARY SHIFT, INTENSE ENERGY, CHAOS: LACK OF A VILLIAN

I've posted a few threads about the planetary shift (3D, 4D to 5D), and given credit to a couple of authors, sound healers, including myself for some wonderful things I've read. These people appear way ahead of me. After all, I am just a party boy that was lucky enough to meditate himself into unity consciousness.

I see that there are others that feel the intense energy, like a ray, beam or waves which can be likened to a strong caffeine nervous high or a really intense Full Moon. So obviously I haven't lost my New Age mind. There have been plenty of references over the past 10-15 years for me to give in detail too. But it has become worse/intense and more disturbing over this time. Relax and enjoy? Hmmm.

But I believe we still must keep perspective but understand why it is hard to sink our teeth into the problem to come together.

There has always been some monster, whether it be an economic crash, political assassination, the rise of a dictator, weather anomalies.

The only difference is now, we don't have any enemy to focus on that is believable. That is the problem. Our grandparents had Hitler and the Japanese attack. This is just one example of how people unite for a cause to defeat an energy. We had villians. The U.S.A. came out of isolationism to help Europe.

But now the predator or rowdy-ness is the cosmos, deep space, a black hole at the center of our Galaxy (central sun), a Being called NILKUR, and supposedly doing all of this for the sake of human evolution. From a mundane standpoint, ain't nobody buying this terrorism non-sense anyway. So we have is INSTABILITY, CHAOS and ENVIRONMENTAL MAYHEM created by governments, banking and industry. Most likely they are fighting the natural evolutionary process... whatever we are going to be after this settles down. ;-D

Our 150 year old carbon footprint, since the Industrial Revolution, has made our planet toxic and very soon we will be facing some real challenges as a species. So as my mentor used to say: "grow or die".

So now we are supposedly "uniting" for a planteary shift? This doesn't get the press or media attention that Hitler received, or Pearl Harbour... so it is quiet. That is if you don't count the hoopla of the 2012 movie (and The Day After Tommorrow). People are going about their business either not feeling anything; being in total denial of their feelings; or going bonkers because they are very sensitive to energetic changes (psychics).

JD Cowan #fundie #conspiracy #crackpot brianniemeier.com

One thing I've been convinced of in recent years is that the Satanic Panic was a psyop. Puritan Evangelicals and Catholics fell into the trap and ended up carrying water for degenerates in power.

Now the Church's in influence is worse than ever, but those in charge are still engaged in the same debauchery and evil they always were. But only the first gets dunked on by midwit Xers and Ys while the other should have total control of their lives. It worked out too conveniently for those in power.

Not to mention, when you look up most of these cases there are always things that don't add up. Son of Sam was certainly a group yet despite mysterious deaths after Berkowitz's capture no one has ever done digging on who Sam Carr actually was. Then there's this bonkers story that never made any sort of sense but somehow tunnel evidence was never found before this? Oh and we still don't know who killed Epstein.

Said the idiot, "Hollywood and the media lied to me about everything, except Religion. That was the one thing they were 100% correct on."

This revelation should have been obvious.

As an aside, I've been scanning articles from when Gen Y became lumped in with Millennials, and the admittance that they were separate groups but were pushed into one for convenience repeatedly came up around 2000. This was because Ys were getting older and Millennials were so different they needed a new name. Even though they admit the two are different they still prefer to lump them together. Mostly because they didn't care about Ys anymore.

Buttercup Dew #racist mynationalistpony.tumblr.com

The factual clarity of ancestry allows one to see through the blinding haze of marxist gobblegook and provides a radiant star of simple purpose - Is this good for my people? The yardstick of ethnicity allows one to cleanly separate oneself from swathes of an amorphous, ever-changing, all-consuming 'humanity’ and factually say that one is distinct. In this way, one creates oneself.

The racially unawakened have no access to this identification - they insist in rejecting measure by the ancestral qualities of a person, and become zombified into an agonised narcissism, their self worth measured in quantity; of sexual partners, of pride parades attended, of retweets and Facebook likes. Only by relevance to the mass, can esteem by gained within the homogenising mass of man.

Ancestral qualities give us the twin blessings of latent capability, and the reason to ignite it. The gravity of necessity compels us to transcend our weaker, past selves, smashing our inferior elements on the altar of race in order to reforge and self-overcome. Ancestral preservation is not merely a material measure, it is a burning compulsion, a metaphysical pull from the basis of existence - to either exist, or not to.

Without this foundation of the real, man is subject to the mercy of economic and animal whim. Consciousness of ancestry is consciousness of the self, and without it, one lives a half-existence, an unlived life; one is born, has parties, and dies; and is of no consequence.

Ancestry encapsulates the duality of existence - Prosperous fertility & total warfare - the oscillation of man between humility before the eternal, and will to power in the moment. To refuse knowledge of ancestry or to remain unconscious of it is to make this world a prison, an unbearable imposition. To recognise and embrace it is to become oneself - One’s better self.

Mark Wiegierski #fundie eurocanadian.ca

Although the Polish-Canadian community (called "Canadian Polonia" by Polish-Canadians) is sometimes spoken of as a unity, it is in fact divided into numerous groups and subgroupings, depending mostly on the time of arrival in Canada. Obviously, waves of immigrants have come from much different Polish societies, and have arrived in much different Canadian societies. There have also been minorities among the immigrants whose relations to the Polish-Canadian community have greatly varied, notably Polish Jews. While one of the most stalwart Polish-Canadians was the sociological scholar Benedykt Heydenkorn, author of numerous worthwhile books about the Polish-Canadian community, others had highly negative feelings towards Poland.

The main waves of Polish immigration to Canada could be identified as pre-World War I; interwar; post-World War II; 1956-1979; Solidarity era; and post-1989. Before World War I, Poland had endured Partition (harsh foreign occupation under Tsarist Russia, Prussia/Germany, and the Habsburg Empire) since 1795. Independence was regained only in 1918. The Polish Second Republic fell before the savage onslaught of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (then Hitler's ally) in September 1939 (when World War II began). It is today relatively little-known outside of Poland that a combined total of about five million Christian Poles perished under the genocidal occupation policies carried out by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (the latter occurring especially during 1939-1941, when Stalin was Hitler's ally).

Betrayed by America and Britain at the Yalta Conference, Poland was assigned to the Soviet sphere of influence (to be officially called the People's Republic of Poland) — along with the wrenching displacement of her frontiers in a westward direction. Stalin and his henchmen imposed hard-line Communism on Poland, rejecting the possibility of permitting considerable internal autonomy, which happened (for example) in the case in Finland.

In consequence of the death of Stalin in 1953, the coming to power of Wladyslaw Gomulka in October 1956 essentially "polonized" the regime and moved it away from the harsh, grinding totalitarianism of the Stalin era. The disturbances of 1968-1970 brought Edward Gierek to power, whose economic policies initiated a short period of considerable prosperity. Nevertheless, the election of the Polish Pope in 1978 galvanized opposition to the Communist regime, culminating in the flowering of the independent trade-union movement, Solidarity. On December 13, 1981, Communist General Jaruzelski declared martial law and attempted to crush the Solidarity movement, which went underground. Finally, the impetus of Solidarity was one of the factors that helped to initiate the massive transformations that resulted in the collapse of the Communist regimes in Eastern Europe in 1989. The Polish Third Republic was proclaimed.

The main socio-cultural and political eras in the far, far more placid Canadian history occurring in roughly the same time-frame could be identified (for example) as pre-1867; Confederation to 1965; 1965-1982; 1982-1993; 1993-2006; 2006-2015, and post-2015. These correspond to the adoption of the new flag, and the beginning of the waning of traditional Canada (1965); the arrival of the new Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982); the Mulroney era (to 1993); the Chretien (and Martin) era (to 2006); and the Harper era (2006-2015). As of the 2015 Canadian federal election, the Harper era has come to a close, and the Justin Trudeau era has begun.

The arrival of Polish-Canadians increased the intra-European diversity of Canada. It could be argued that the initial definition of "multiculturalism" in Canada was mostly meant to refer to other European groups, apart from the English and French, especially Eastern and Southern Europeans. That definition has been mostly eclipsed since the 1980s, with the arrival of huge "visible minority" immigration. Today, Polish-Canadians are seen as mere members of a once homogeneously "White Canada."

Although everyone among the various groupings and subgroupings of the Polish-Canadian community may be "of Polish descent" — they in fact have distinctly different self-definitions and cultural preoccupations. Coming from much different Polish societies, and arriving in much different Canadian societies, fundamentally changes the self-definitions and cultural preoccupations of persons, even if they are said to belong to the same ethnic group.

Poles in Canada have mostly failed to establish a line of generational continuity. Thus, while young people continue to arrive from Poland, the young people of the generations born in Canada, are almost invariably lost to Polishness. There does not seem to be a strongly-active and more intellectual forum or setting or context where a dynamic, intermediary, somewhat enduring, emphatically Polish as well as Canadian identity can get underway and be worked out.

For those young persons who have maintained extensive ties to Polishness, there has frequently occurred a high degree of cognitive dissonance. On the one hand, they had mostly accepted the enculturation by their Polish parents, viewing Polishness as a very large element of their lives, yet at the same time, they had very great difficulties with ever finding a recognition of the importance of Polishness in the society at large. Thus, their inner map or picture or understanding of the world was set on a path of fundamental tension with the prevailing societal environment.

Those few young people who clung to extensive elements of Polishness were likely to have found the dissonance rather difficult to bear. And they had virtually no groups of peers within the Polish-Canadian community to interact with, or find a degree of comfort or reassurance with.

What seems to be the invariable destiny for virtually all persons of Polish descent in Canada, is to melt and meld into the rather bland category of the so-called mainstream. And it could be argued that the so-called mainstream is not a particularly exciting place to be today.

In Canada, unlike in the U.S., multiculturalism policies — especially in the 1970s — did give considerable attention to so-called "White ethnics." The increasing diversification of Canada has meant that Polish-Canadians are seen as less and less important. Most Polish-Canadians are astounded at the pace of the demographic transformation of Canada. They remember a time when they were considered as "too ethnic" — but now, they are seen as "not ethnic enough."

The prevalent, current-day mood of postmodernism and multiculturalism in Canada should in theory encourage the construction of various, strongly-felt intermediary identities — one among which could be the Polish-Canadian. However, this does not appear to be happening, as far as the creation of a more collectively-felt and lasting identity for those persons.

It would be in the interest of the Polish-Canadian community to see limits on current-day immigration — over 80 percent of which consists of "visible minorities" — since Polish-Canadians are becoming regarded as less and less important under the newer forms of multiculturalism. There is also the fact that the immigration numbers are now so huge, resulting in very rapid and massive demographic shifts. It would also be in their interest to cultivate a distinct Polish-Canadian identity, which would allow them to resist the various blandishments of the current-day North American pop-culture and consumer society.

It may be noted that in Poland today, there is a salutary resistance to alien immigration, and most of the country remains proudly patriotic. Canada and Poland could be seen as polar opposites within the broader Western world.

east/west889 #fundie wnd.com

If anything God will help those in this country who have been following what should be done every day....Pray to Him, for ALL the cretins of this country who have shown hatred, and have demonized people for no good reason... and also to follow His Son, Jesus Christ. IF you have that kind of Prayer, then...sure...it could be answered. The "real" Christians do that every day & help those who are in need. Obama doesn't like the poor people...he just want to control them and thinks of them as "dirt". Praying IS what irks the heck out of Obama, which is why he goes bonkers with all this actions, despises the Christians (and the Jews)....he's very worried that people are correct when they say that God will intervene when He's ready and has the best PLAN ever! Nope, it doesn't "include" Obama as a "Dictator" either! And that ISN'T just the Christians saying it! There are SO many other people who believe that it IS going to happen....it's just a matter of time. These dimwits in the District of Corruption might win a "few battles" here and there, but they will NEVER win the war. Just read some of the incredible posts of those who are ready to take any action if needed....Obama has NO chance and would never be able to do a Third Term.

Julie Bush #racist facebook.com

This is my opinion of what should be done to ANYONE destroying or defacing our National monuments or statues. This is not open for argument, so if you disagree, move on. Don't spew a bunch of shit on this post, cause I will delete it. Make your own post.
They should be arrested immediately, even if the National Guard has to come in and assist. Thrown in jail with no bond. Put on a chain gang like they use to do back in the day, and clean and repair each and every thing that was destroyed or defaced. And the officers and guardsmen should receive hazzard pay. The way to get this shit to stop is to come down on the with a heavy hand. Not enough room in jails, build more tent jails like I believe they did in maybe Arizona? Too hot to live in, tough! Many people go without a/c. Going to be too cold come winter, tough! Many go without proper heating, God knows I did for years. Suck it up buttercups!! Not enough food to feed them, give them bologna or peanut butter, I'll donate the first case!! Like I said, this is my opinion, I'm tired of watching these spoiled brats destroy the country I love and am thankful for!!

Salcedo-1989 #fundie imdb.com

[Re-Elizabeth: The Golden Age]

This movie is pure propaganda! I am of Spanish descent and been catholic all my life. I'm very proud of my ancestors who saved Christendom by kicking out the moors from Europe. This movie does nothing but vilify them and paint a cartonish picture of our Church. It is depicable the way we are portrayed like monsters! If you are a catholic i Implore you not to see this garbage, or at least do not pay to see but i warn if you watch you will get physically sick by all the propaganda! STAY AWAY!

Too bad you english never accepted salvation through Jesus Christ. Protestantism is a heretical faith!!! And Elizabeth was a despicable tyrant who do not deserve all this praise! Thank you

Karen Dincher Weight #fundie rawstory.com

A Pennsylvania school board had no problem electing a new member even after it was disclosed that she boasted on Facebook that she is “officially against Muslims,” and accused gays of turning children into “zombie fairies.”

According to the Sun Gazette, the Montoursville Area School Board voted to appoint Karen Dincher Wright to fill a spot on the board despite protests over her hateful postings on Facebook.

The Gazette points out that each member of the board was given a file containing 15 racist, anti-Muslim and homophobic posts that Wright had written over the previous year.

Despite the files containing screenshots of Wright stating, “I am officially against Muslims. We need to take a stand as Christians and Jews,” she was approved by a 5-3 vote.

In one particularly wide-ranging and noxious rant, Wright laid out her world view for all to see on Facebook.

“I am fed up with the rainbows and and flags and ‘I’m offended crap,'” she wrote. ” Suck it up, buttercup. This is still America. We will tolerate you, for now.”

“You want to marry the same sex? Fine, marry a goat. I really don’t care,” she continued. “But when you start demanding we like what you do and have to cater to you, we are done with you.”

She concluded, “This is still America. We will tolerate your beliefs, but we will not become overcome with them. If you don’t like it we can arrange passage to another country. And when you start dividing us and turning our children into zombie fairies, then we will not tolerate you anymore. We will fight you.”

According to Wright, public discussion of her Facebook rants were taken out of context and that she felt she was treated unfairly.

“I did not deserve that … I am not the person they made me out to be,” she said. “I have no hidden agendas, I have nothing to hide. Here I stand … All I want to do is make a difference in the school. I feel I can make a difference.”

Screenshots of some of Wright’s Facebook posts — which are now hidden — below:

image
image
image
image

gingerpuss34 #sexist reddit.com

The movement is not sustainable. The ideology is inherently flawed. I have yet to hear any convincing logical arguments to support trans-ideology. The best effort I've seen is the citation of studies on the "ladybrain" argument, but there are so few of those studies and they are so flawed, so the citation of junk science isn't going to cut it.

They will continue to alienate LGB people and while LBGT media and activism groups don't seem to care that their sexual orientation is yet again being invalidated, individual people will care and while it hasn't occurred yet, a rift seems inevitable (Drop the T!) A rift within transactivism also seems inevitable. It's already bubbling up in the truscum v tucute. If you can say you're trans without any form of transitioning, that is a direct contradiction to the position of the necessity of transitioning because your brain "doesn't match" or whatever.

I'm an old lady by Reddit standards. I think a lot of people who identify as trans or queer will grow out of it. It's a new form of teenage rebellion and self expression. When I was a teenager, it was certain music and fashion scenes to assert our individuality and freak out our parents. When my sister was a teenager, the alternative girls all identified as bi with bi being defined as making out with girls while you are drunk aka not bi, now we have this hot mess.

Men will not experience the same bullying that women do, however the "my penis is female, have sex with me" will not jive with a lot of men. But, most TIMs are heterosexual, so again, women will have to deal with that crap more. A lot of conservative men and anti-feminists who aren't specifically MRAs can see that trans-logic makes no sense. A lot of the anti-feminist stuff I have seen is actually anti-stereotypical libfem. I don't think they'd like fully embrace GC or anything, but there are people on both sides that see this is completely bonkers.

terminalpolitics #fundie terminalpolitics.tumblr.com

The “Read this” school of revolutionary thought

Is so far removed from what we actually need today that I sometimes wish rightists had been successful in suppressing all previous Leftist thought.

We should really burn every Leftist book, erase the pdfs, and purge the quotes. Every single idea we have taken from the past is an impediment to creating a better future.

If you want a revolution, speak to people in terms of their lives and conditions today and their plans for tomorrow.

All publications are banned until further notice.

Unnamed Brits #conspiracy #crackpot theverge.com

5G phone masts are being set alight in the UK, after online conspiracy theories have misleadingly linked the cell towers to the coronavirus pandemic. The BBC reports that at least three 5G towers were set alight within the last week, and police and fire services were called to extinguish the flames.

“I’m absolutely outraged and disgusted that people would be taking action against the infrastructure we need to tackle this emergency,” said Stephen Powis, the National Health Service (NHS) director, at a daily UK coronavirus briefing. Police have now launched investigations into how the 5G towers caught fire.

Rumors and conspiracy theories over a link between the roll out of 5G and the spread of coronavirus have been spread primarily through social media networks. A variety of groups exist on Facebook and Nextdoor, where thousands of members repeat false and misleading claims that 5G is supposedly harmful.

One theory claims that the novel coronavirus originated in Wuhan because the Chinese city had recently been rolling out 5G. It’s now supposedly spread to other cities that are also using 5G. These false conspiracy theories neglect to mention that a highly contagious virus would naturally spread more in densely populated cities with access to 5G, and that the coronavirus pandemic has hit counties like Iran and Japan where 5G isn’t in use yet.

There is no scientific evidence that links the coronavirus pandemic to 5G, nor any immediate negative health effects to 5G. Full Fact, an independent fact checking charity in the UK, has explored the claims after a British tabloid newspaper highlighted them recently. 5G uses a higher frequency of radio waves than 4G or 3G, but regulators in the UK have recorded 5G electromagnetic radiation levels well below international guidelines.


This is the consequence of those bonkers Facebook conspiracy theories about 5G. Key workers getting harassed on the street. pic.twitter.com/5z35r6sabp
— Charlie Haynes (@charliehtweets) April 2, 2020

This hasn’t stopped these wild conspiracy theories from spreading, though. Some people are even harassing workers laying fiber optic cables for 5G installations, claiming that when 5G is turned on it’s going to “kill everyone.”

Amos Moses #fundie christiannews.net

Rhesus Peanut Buttercup:
I wonder what sin you think a transgender person is guilty of, since they aren't even doing anything.

Amos Moses:
IDOLATRY ........ it is all plain out and out NARCISSISM .............

Rhesus Peanut Buttercup:
Your statement makes no sense, idolatry is worshipping an object and narcissism is self-love. A transgender believes themselves to be the opposite gender than what they are. So neither of the words you use can apply.

Amos Moses:
" idolatry is worshipping an object and narcissism is self-love"
they are not mutually exclusive ...... and the OBJECT is SELF ........ ummmmm ..... DUH .......

Rhesus Peanut Buttercup:
But not love of self. It’s identity.

Amos Moses:
NOPE ....... love of self is NARCISSISM ..... denial of self towards another is love ..... love is not self centered ...... homosexualism and transgenderism is about destructive self love ..... it is conceit ..... it is not self worth ...... it is NARCISSISM ......

Rhesus Peanut Buttercup:
You should really invest in a dictionary. I don’t believe you know what half the words you are using even mean.

Amos Moses:
you do not understand the BIBLICAL definition ... and this is a CHRISTIAN site ..... maybe YOU should read up ........

Rhesus Peanut Buttercup:
There is no such thing as a Biblical definition, there is only a definition. I would like you to tell me what homosexuality, which is simply the attraction to another person of the same sex, could possibly have to do with narcissism. It would be like me telling you that you don't actually love your wife, you actually only love yourself.

Amos Moses:
"There is no such thing as a Biblical definition"
there CERTAINLY is .... this is a christian forum ..... about topics of interest to CHRISTIANS ..... for CHRISTIANS to discuss ..... you are welcome to be here ..... BUT ..... YOU CAME HERE ..... we did not go looking for YOU ...... and if you want to participate ..... then the DEFINITIONS are ours ........ NOT YOURS .......... and if you do not like it ..... TOO BAD .......
"It would be like me telling you that you don't actually love your wife, you actually only love yourself."
and that happens ..... EVERYDAY ..... so what ..........

Catherine Frompovich #conspiracy activistpost.com

How Would You Like A SMART METER In Your Automobile: It’s Coming In Order To Pave The Way For Self-Driving Cars

Folks the information below is no techno bull malarkey!

Seriously, auto makers probably will be installing “smart meters” in all new cars so as to prevent accidents but, realistically, it’s surreptitiously a way to pave the way for – you got it – “self-driving cars”!

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is proposing to mandate radar (called V2V technology) in all new cars and light trucks. [1]

The system is the V2V, which is like a smart meter in the car!

Smart meters on your utility services pump radiofrequencies (RFs) into your homes and, if being proposed for autos, somewhere operating close to your body while in your new high-tech automobile!

Isn’t microwave technology going crazy?

How much in the way of RFs do you think your body, especially your central nervous system, i.e., the brain, can be subjected to before you go bonkers?

What do you think will happen when 5G pumps out millimeter waves, which will activate your body’s sweat glands? Don’t believe that? Check out this research.

Will everyone now enjoy “hot sweats,” not just menopausal women?

5G is ultra-high frequency and ultra-high intensity. 5G uses between 24 to 90 gigahertz frequency.

Source: Radiation Health Risks

Consider the constant exposures to and from:

• Wi-Fi everywhere you go
• Cell towers, cell phones, iPhones
• Stingray towers
• GWEN towers
• 4G, 5G and possibly 6G broadband
• 5G cell towers probably every 300 or so feet

Even in front of your home or bedroom window

• ‘Smart’ home appliances, which spy on you inside your home
• Utility [electric, natural gas, water] company AMI Smart Meters

According to EMF Safety Network,

The [V2V] antenna is omni-directional, allowed to transmit up to approximately 2 watts of power output at 10 Mhz and 5.9 Ghz with a range of 300 meters, or three football fields in length, every 100 milliseconds, or 10 pulses a second. The proximity of the transmitter to the driver and passengers is unknown, but could be inches to a few feet away from people in the car.

Do you want your children walking down a street being RF-irradiated by everyone’s car on the road?