Similar posts

Marie Cachet #racist ancestralcult.com

It is well known that many prominent Jews, such as Marx, participated in Satanic Rituals and other bizarre actions, but why?

From what has been written about it, by persons such as Aleister Crowley,Robert Anton Wilson, and others, the purpose is to break every Taboo.

Such as rape, homosexual rape, child rape, incestuous rape, torture, child torture, murder, child murder, theft, vandalism, looting, extortion, fraud, arson, treason, smuggling, and on and on.

To break each and every Taboo, to leave no Taboo unbroken.
But why?

The Jew considers an honest law abiding man to be nothing more than a robot blindly following the programming that was handed down by parents, priests, teachers, bosses, law makers, and even peers.

Thus the Jew is constrained in its actions, and therefore constrained in its profits, deprived of its desires.

By breaking every Taboo, the Jew becomes unconstrained.

To the Jew it is considered to be defeating the programming, and it has been called“killing the robot”. When the programming has been defeated, the robot (the limitations that constrained the Jew) will die, and only then may the Jew truly live.

At that point the Jew will be able to do any deed, commit any action, without mercy or regret. Nothing will then prevent the Jew from attaining whatever it desires.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

watch out for the UK THEY HATE TRUMP WATCH THEM DONT TRUST THEM

Watch out europe may do some kond of election fraud
The uk is scared to death of Donald Trump!
Already they look like complete idiots after having a parliamentary debate on banning him from the UK.

But seriously watch out for them, they may even try to assassinate him!

[...]

LET US RMAIN HOPEFUL TRUMP CAN TAKE THEM DOWN
HES NOT INTO ISLAMIC TRADE AND WONT WORK WITH THE UK
ISLAMIC AND EUROPEAN ISLAMIC TRAITORS

TAKE THEM DOWN TRUMP
STOP TRADE WITH THEM

THEY WANT RO DO IT TO ISRAEL
YOU SHOW THEM TRUMP

YES!!!

[...]

YES TRUMP!!
Crush those islamic PROSTATE leaders TRUMP
WITH AN IRON FIST
CRUSH THE LILLY LIVERD UK TRAITORS
SIMTE THEM
DESTROY THEM
HUMILIATE THEM
LET THEM CRINGE AND WISH THEY NEVER TOOK OFFICE!!

YES TRUMP save the children from the islamic scum UK BABY MURDERERS TRUMP

YES TRUMP!!
Crush those islamic PROSTATE leaders TRUMP
WITH AN IRON FIST
CRUSH THE LILLY LIVERD UK TRAITORS
SIMTE THEM
DESTROY THEM
HUMILIATE THEM
LET THEM CRINGE AND WISH THEY NEVER TOOK OFFICE!!

TRUMP ROAR AT THEM LIKE A LION
LET THEM BE ASHAMED OF THEIR TREACHORY

RetroSpriteResources #sexist forum.deviantart.com

Donald Trump is our leader and thus deserves the full respect of each and every one of his subjects. But feminists spit on him just because he's successful and male. They use content where he made harmless and playful jokes about women from back in his days as a comedian to claim that he's sexist when anyone with an IQ with at least 3 digits knows that our great leader would never actually do anything sexist. And yes, I would still support Trump if he was female. And yes, I would still forgive this female Trump if she said that she likes to grab men by the cock. You know why? Because that was just a harmless and playful joke.

Tucker Carlson #sexist wonkette.com

HEADLINE: Being Tucker Carlson Means Never Having To Say You're Sorry For Defending Child Rape

On Sunday afternoon, Media Matters For America released a series of audio tapes of Tucker Carlson making regular calls to the Bubba the Love Sponge show in which he made a variety of disturbing comments, not the least of which were several defenses of FLDS leader Warren Jeffs and his habit of marrying young girls himself or forcing them to marry other older men -- a crime Tucker Carlson does not consider all that bad if it is even a crime at all.

While most people in Carlson's position would apologize and do the whole "I know better now" rigamarole, he is refusing, and has instead released a statement telling people to watch his show.

Media Matters caught me saying something naughty on a radio show more than a decade ago. Rather than express the usual ritual contrition, how about this: I'm on television every weeknight live for an hour. If you want to know what I think, you can watch. Anyone who disagrees with my views is welcome to come on and explain why.

Hard pass!

The newly released tapes reveal that in 2006, Carlson defended Warren Jeffs by saying that he didn't do anything that bad because he didn't rape any of those underage girls himself, insisting that forcing a girl to marry an old dude and have sex with him the rest of her life just is not as bad as pulling a stranger off the street and raping her.

CARLSON: He's not accused of touching anybody; he is accused of facilitating a marriage between a 16-year-old girl and a 27-year-old man. That's the accusation. That's what they're calling felony rape. [crosstalk] That's bullshit. I'm sorry. Now this guy may be [crosstalk], may be a child rapist. I'm just telling you that arranging a marriage between a 16-year-old and a 27-year-old is not the same as pulling a stranger off the street and raping her. That's bullshit.

THE LOVE SPONGE: But Tuck, that's just a small little thing that they got him on. Now, this guy is a --

CARLSON: Wait, wait, wait. Since when do you believe everything the government says? Wait a second.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Hold on. You know what --

CARLSON: All of a sudden, like we're very skeptical about everything until like some prosecutor comes out and says, "This guy's bad," and the rest of us nod in agreement like a church choir, "Yeah, he's bad." How do we know he's bad? What do we know exactly? Nothing.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Tucker, Tucker, settle down, lover. I mean, come on. I mean, jeez.

CARLSON: Get excited.

Yeah. If Warren Jeffs had only ever forced underage girls to marry and have sex with old dudes, that would still be illegal. However, that was not the case. While the charges Jeffs faced in Utah and Arizona were for facilitation only, he was indicted in 2008b on felony charges in Texas for personally sexually assaulting two girls, ages 12 and 15 (the conviction on which he is currently serving time, as both the Utah and Arizona charges were thrown out so that Texas could pursue the more serious charge). In May of 2008, The Smoking Gun released "first anniversary" pictures of Jeffs, taken in 2006, with a girl he had married when she was 12.

[Photos of Jeffs with his child-bride shown (her face is blurred). Caption reads, 'These were available and well-publicized at the time Carlson said Jeffs did not marry underage girls himself.']

Now, had Carlson only said these things in 2006, it would have been fair for him to say "Well, that information was not available to me at the time." Yet, all of this information was available to Carlson in 2009 when he made these other statements about Jeffs, which repulsed even the shock jock hosts:

CARLSON: Look, just to make it absolutely clear. I am not defending underage marriage at all. I just don't think it's the same thing exactly as pulling a child from a bus stop and sexually assaulting that child.

CO-HOST: Yeah, it's -- you know what it is? It's much more planned out and plotted.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Yeah, it should be almost -- you almost should put a premeditation --

CARLSON: Wait, wait! Hold on a second. The rapist, in this case, has made a lifelong commitment to love and take care of the person, so it is a little different. I mean, let's be honest about it.

CO-HOST: That's twisted.


That is, indeed, twisted.

By no measure is rape somehow more OK if you marry a woman and rape her for the rest of her life. It's not more OK if the rapist "loves" the victim, it's not more OK if they buy the victim dinner first, or if that rape is part of their "religion." A father who rapes his daughter has also made a commitment to love and take care of her, and I don't think anyone would say that is somehow "less bad" than if he grabbed another girl "off the street." Jeffs forced hundreds of underage girls to marry adult men and have sex with them. He also married and had sex with underage girls himself.

In 2009 -- which was, I remind you, a full year after Jeffs' Texas indictment and the pictures released by The Smoking Gun -- Carlson continued insisting that Jeffs absolutely did not marry underage girls himself.

CO-HOST: Yeah, that's what Warren Jeffs' in prison for. He's not in prison for polygamy, he's in prison for child rape.

CARLSON: Well, actually, he's not in prison for that. He didn't -- Warren Jeffs didn't marry underaged girls, actually.

CO-HOST: No, he's in prison for facilitation of child rape.

CARLSON: Whatever the hell that means.

CO-HOST: That means that --

CARLSON: He's in prison because he's weird and unpopular and he has a different lifestyle that other people find creepy.

CO-HOST: No, he is an accessory to the rape of children. That is a felony and a serious one at that.

CARLSON: What do you mean an accessory? He's like got some weird religious cult where he thinks it's OK to, you know, marry underaged girls, but he didn't do it. Why wouldn't the guy who actually did it, who had sex with an underaged girl, he should be the one who's doing life.


Wait until he finds out about Charles Manson!

And then he said:

I should make the -- you know what, I should make the laws around here, and Michael Vick would have been executed, and Warren Jeffs would be out on the street.

For the record, of his own 78 wives, 12 were 16 when Jeffs married them, and another 12 were 15 or under. So not only was Carlson's defense of Jeffs "twisted," he was also incredibly factually wrong about what Jeffs was accused of doing.

Of course, Carlson's defense of Jeffs isn't that far off from what other conservatives have said in the past about rape. Notably, Todd Akin tried to argue that there was a difference between "grey rape" and "legitimate rape," while claiming that women could not get pregnant from "legitimate" rape.

These weren't the only horrific statements Carlson made on the program. He also defended a teacher sleeping with a 13-year-old male student by saying that the teacher was actually doing a "service" by raping a child, so that the girls in his class wouldn't have to have sex with them.

So my point is that teacher's like this, not necessarily this one in particular, but they are doing a service to all 13-year-old girls by taking the pressure off. They are a pressure relief valve, like the kind you have on your furnace.

Again, child rape is bad. It's not up for discussion.

Carlson also laughed gleefully at the idea of abusing women, called Martha Stewart's daughter "cunty" and offered to give her the "spanking" she deserves (Carlson notably flipped out over Samantha Bee using the word "cunt" to describe Ivanka Trump, saying that he didn't know any man who would ever dare use that word because of how degrading it is), he compared women to dogs and called them "primitive," he repeatedly accused Hillary Clinton of wanting to cut off all of the penises in the world, and claimed that there is "no Canadian woman" anyone would pay to sleep with.

Will Carlson face the same fate Milo Yiannopoulos faced after he defended child rape? That's doubtful. The fact is, none of this is any worse than what he says on a daily basis on his show. He says terrible things all the time, and that is why he is so beloved by so many terrible, terrible people. It's not surprising that he is standing by his statements, or that people like Erick Erickson think the real crime is unearthing the things he said many years ago in the first place, suggesting that defending child rape as an adult man is just some kind of youthful indiscretion that isn't worth being concerned over.

After all, what would you expect from the party that elected President Grab Em By The Pussy?

xHPx #fundie reddit.com

I find this show the most horrible on earth. I am also disgusted at how bad of a person Chris Hansen is. He knows he's (basically) ending another man's life and he's just sitting there calm about it. I'm all for them getting their punishments etc., but not censoring their faces/voice and airing their name for the entire world to see is just wrong.

It's not like any of the people on the show is actively looking for 13 year olds because in reality, there is no 13 year old cute girl in adult chat rooms looking for a 45 year old perv to lose her virginity to. They're just putting out dream-come-true scenarios that are too good to be true with young cute girls willing to do anything for free, and some dumb guys falls for it. So far, has there even been 1 single guy on this show that had any record of previous sexual charges against minors? I don't think so.


Rape is sexual intercourse without the other party's consent. Children can't consent. All sex with children is rape, you sick fuck.

Shut the fuck up you dumb fucking douchebag. Rape=/=Child sexual abuse. She wanted it, it's still illegal, I know. But quit saying "raping a child". And besides, he wasn't going to rape a child, he was going to talk to Christ Hansen.

Shut the fuck up, you're so retarded it hurts. I honestly wish there was a retard-lock for reddit so that people like you would get the fuck away. But RES block function will have to do the job for now, bye you dumb fucking loser. :)

sadoeconomics #fundie sadoeconomist.tumblr.com

Can you give a good reason why you believe child pornography ahouldnt be illegal? Because to me it sounds like youre justifying child rape in the name of "anti-censorship"

I’m not doing that at all, and you shouldn’t put scare quotes on anti-censorship.

First, let’s go over a few incidents. Recently, I heard about an acquaintance of mine whose 16-year-old son’s 17-year-old girlfriend attempted to send him a topless selfie but instead accidentally texted it to her neighbor, an old lady who freaked out and called the police. And the first reaction of the police was to begin the process of indicting ALL THREE OF THEM for possession of child pornography and adding them to the sex offender registry for life - and it’s only because the girl’s dad was a golfing buddy of the chief of police that it ended with all of their cell phones being confiscated and wiped instead. Does this sound like a reasonable way of dealing with this situation? Were all of them child rapists? How much prison time should you get for the crime of receiving an unsolicited JPEG file exactly?

Let’s consider also the Playpen incident last year, which was what prompted that post you’re probably responding to, in which the FBI ran a sting operation that disseminated a massive amount of child pornography through the dark web, which was so badly mishandled that very few people they caught downloading real hardcore child rape pornography can be prosecuted. The US federal government is itself unquestionably the biggest distributor of child pornography there is. This is the same federal government that ran COINTELPRO, MKULTRA, the Tuskegee syphilis experiments, etc. And they are now headed by Donald Trump, who is one of several political figures who went to Jeffrey Epstein’s private island before Epstein was convicted of trafficking in underage prostitutes. Donald Trump of the Republican Party, which recently had Dennis Hastert as the Speaker of the House, who has since been convicted of raping an underage boy. And let’s not even get into all the shit the Democrats have been caught doing. Are these the people you trust to fairly enforce these laws? Do you think it would be difficult for any three-letter agency to put child pornography on your computer without your knowledge if they wanted to, so they could prosecute anyone they wanted and claim they were secretly a pedophile, to destroy their reputation? Is that a power you are comfortable with Donald Trump and the deep state having? They haven’t been willing to legally define ‘pornography,’ even. Having laws forbidding certain combinations of ones and zeroes hands those people a blank check to destroy whomever they wish.

Let’s go back to what prompted my personal interest in this whole debate, which was the relationship I had with an older woman when I was 16 - when I had a job, I was going to college, I was allowed to drive a multi-ton motor vehicle, I was talking to a recruiter about joining the Marine Corps, etc. but had no access to many other legal rights arbitrarily withheld from people under 18. If she had sent me racy photos of herself or vice versa, well, she might still be in prison today. As it was, we carefully avoided putting her at risk for two very long years until I was 18, at which point we had a rather normal romantic adult relationship for several years that ended amicably, that I look back on fondly today. As the person who was supposedly protected here by being forcibly kept apart from the person I loved, how do you think I feel about the state’s interference in our relationship now? If you guessed ‘immensely resentful even after all these years,’ you are correct. Would it have been child rape on her part if I had sent her a picture of my naked body unprompted? Does it make any sense that I could pledge to sign several years of my life over to the military at that age but I couldn’t send someone a picture of myself? Do you get how that experience molded my opinion on the subject and made me willing to speak out on the subject even if it meant people would call me a pedophile?

One of the most famous home movies in history is the Zapruder film of the Kennedy assassination. We’ve all seen it, right? But it’s photographic evidence of a crime. Shouldn’t we all be charged with condoning the murder of the president for watching that footage, by your logic? Surely you agree that murder is worse than rape. Shouldn’t possessing media of a person being killed be illegal, if possessing media of a person being raped should be? And if animated or drawn child pornography is illegal, shouldn’t possessing any movie or video game in which a person is shown being killed be grounds for imprisonment as well? The logic that you folks use has implications far beyond this subject, but you never really pursue those implications (and you shouldn’t, because they’re insane).

My point is, that’s because you’re fabricating unsound legal principles here to support the existence of this unjust, unconstitutional law (probably because anyone who questions it gets accused of being a pedophile, and you don’t want to wind up with clueless anons accusing you of justifying child rape, for example), instead of coming up with law based on sound legal principles. In any other context, anyone would tell you that possessing a picture or video of a crime is not the same thing as committing the crime yourself and the harm was entirely in the original crime, not just watching it. Are you justifying robbing convenience stores by saying it shouldn’t be illegal to watch America’s Dumbest Criminals? And if we took that principle to extremes it’d suppress important political speech - for example, after Vietnam the American media was pressured by the military to stop showing images of US soldiers in body bags, and as a consequence we’re more emotionally isolated from the wars currently being waged and information about the circumstances of the deaths of soldiers has been kept from the public ‘out of respect.’ Laws against pornography were used not so long ago to suppress information about birth control and sex education. It’s not unimaginable that there’s something important we’re not being allowed to know about, or that we’re all afraid to discuss, because it’s been declared child pornography. Censorship is absolutely something you should be afraid of in any form, and even well-meaning censorship can inadvertently suppress the truth. A free society, especially a democracy, depends on open access to information to function and I’m skeptical of anything that nibbles at that around the edges, even for the noblest of causes. These things always have chilling effects on expression far beyond their official limits as well. If some JPEGs can be illegal it requires all this machinery of surveillance and enforcement that can be just as easily used to suppress other things, and if we don’t trust the state, which we shouldn’t, we shouldn’t be comfortable with that machinery of censorship existing at all. We can’t trust them to stay within their mission - look at all the NSA personnel spying on their girlfriends instead of terrorists. Look at how the state has far outgrown its constitutional bounds. Stopping a few fucked up people from getting access to their preferred masturbation material is not worth having to give Leviathan access to all of our digital communications.

I am an anarchist. I discuss radical libertarian politics here. That’s why I’m against this law that’s been abused so much, the enforcement of which has been a massive travesty of justice for decades. Not because I’m ‘trying to justify child rape.’ My ideology is rooted in the nonaggression principle, which rape obviously violates. Do you think I should take the position of ‘we need to remove all power from the government except the power to prosecute people for child pornography?’ There’s no exception here to my general critique of the state. And what do you think would happen to child rapists in Ancapistan, anyway? ‘Hunted for sport’ is my guess. A convicted child rapist would probably not be able to retain the protection of a DRO (I’ve conjectured for a long time that that might be the one thing all of them would refuse to deal with) and they’d have the status of a medieval outlaw, they’d have no legal protections - likely a de facto death sentence with all the people who’d be lining up to kill them. Meanwhile, the state plays catch and release with child rapists - go check the sex offender map and see how many live in your community right now, I dare you.

Anyway, Anon, you are the unwitting pawn of someone who has started a harassment campaign against me, who has accused me of all kinds of other ridiculous vile shit in the past few days as well, and sent messages encouraging me to commit suicide. They dug up a post from nearly two years ago and reposted it outside of the context of the ongoing debate we had had, triggered by the revelation that the FBI had disseminated a massive amount of child pornography on the deep web. I had explained all of this back then in even greater detail, but then someone sent me an anon asking me about banning violent porn and I made the mistake of mentioning my position again without that context, so it could be misinterpreted by people unfamiliar with my ideas.

So yeah, I don’t condone raping children, I’m not a psychopath, I just really don’t trust the government, in large part because there are so many actual child rapists at the highest levels of government, and I think we can do better than the current system. I hope this clarifies my thinking for you.

Sara Reda Vinci #fundie helium.com

Dungeon and Dragons kill a baby, well it was actually the parents who killed the baby however they forgot about the baby because they were so busy playing D&D. The baby starved to death, yes, tears still overtake me at the that thought. The baby died of starvation, think of that, think of the languish cries of the baby, of the hunger pangs, and discomfort that this child, God's creation had to suffer.
Now I would like anyone to tell me that this is not devilish, who or what would make a mother forget to take care of her baby. How engrossed could they have been in their
fabled world that they not hear a child's scream of hunger. How could they be so beguiled by a game that a human life is sacrificed. I did say sacrificed, the child was the Sacrificial Lamb of D&D. The crazed parents in my view had sold their souls to the devil. A reporter said that they had food in the home and that they had taken the time to nourish themselves. The baby starved. Evil won over Good, the devil won and God instead gives us free will to choose right from wrong. That opted for all the pleasure , self indulgence and narcissism that the Devil showers on all who follow him. Dungeons and Dragons is an open door to the Lair of Satan himself one innocent baby can attest to that.

The Millennium Report #wingnut #conspiracy #racist themillenniumreport.com

Make no mistake about it, Kamala Harris was born and bred, socially engineered and mind-control programmed to function as a Manchurian Candidate and female Obama.

In point of fact, just like Barack Hussein Obama, she is not even a U.S. citizen.

Just like Obama, Kamala Harris is not a U.S. citizen
As a matter of historical fact, Kamala Harris was not even eligible to run for POTUS as she did during the 2020 election cycle since she is clearly does not meet the criteria of the U.S. Constitution’s “natural-born-citizen clause”.

Sen. Kamala Harris was not constitutionally eligible to run for POTUS, nor eligible to run for VPOTUS.
Biden’s VP will become POTUS if he wins

Democrat POTUS nominee Joe Biden has spent months floating one black woman after another as his VP pick knowing all along his choice was ORDERED by his hidden masters to be Sen. Kamala Harris of California.

The strategy was to put off any official announcement as long as possible in order to subject Harris to as little vetting as possible. This scheme was quite similar to the total lack of vetting of Obama in 2008 who never even presented a valid birth certificate.
<...>
Citizenship and Birth Certificate Psyop
Every investigators and analysts really understood that the Obama birth certificate (BC) controversy was fabricated with extremely purposeful design. The DNC knew exactly that Obama’s birth certificate and citizenship documents were not legit. The Democrats colluded with Deep State to intentionally implemented this psychological operation as a means of cynically mocking the Right every single day for 8 long years. In fact, every conservative who reasonably questions Obama’s BC is pejoratively labelled a “birther”.

By efficiently carrying out this psyop, the perps were able to keep the GOP on the defensive. Rather than confront the BC issue head on with the transparent truth, Republicans everywhere were silenced. Collectively, they were cowed and then corralled into a pen of compliance which did not question Obama’s authenticity. The perps even gave Obama a fake Social Security Number to add insult to injury.

What’s the critical point?

The Democrat strategy of forcing the Republicans to never investigate Obama (with the exception of the ever-courageous Sheriff Joe Arpaio) allowed him to get away with bloody murder and worse over his two catastrophic terms.

The crucial point here is that the highly deceitful Democrats will attempt to use the exact same stratagem with a Kamala Harris presidency if Biden wins. Her background is every bit as clouded and confusing for the very same reasons as Obama’s was. Because of the serious problems with her citizenship, she could never withstand the opposition research that would be conducted in the Trump era. Hence, the scheme to install her as POTUS by first electing Biden.

By the way, that’s just one piece of the “Joe Biden-Kamala Harris Criminal Conspiracy”. Willfully subverting the U.S. Constitution in this manner is a capital crime. When the ultimate objective is to dissolve the American Republic in order to transfer sovereignty to the United Nations, that’s a far more serious transgression.

Bryce Lockwood #fundie returnofkings.com

A Guide To Weimerica

Bryce Lockwood is a straight white male who works at a university in a blue state and thus cannot use his real name. He writes, he lifts, he has skin in the game, and he lives at Ground Zero for Weimerica. He possess an ever-present sense of humor that would have seen him quip, “Merry Christmas, ya filthy animal!” had he been the SEAL that capped Bin Laden. He also has a masochistic streak that has expressed itself by climbing Mt. Tammany in the rain and reading the citation sections of various history books. He recently had to buy a new wardrobe as his waist shrunk from his workout and he just passed day 60 of the NF challenge. Friendly to stray dogs, hostile to stray thots.

“Weimerica,” an amalgam of Germany’s pre-Nazi era Weimar Republic, is a term you’ve probably heard in the past year if you’ve been active in the ongoing political maelstrom that is social media. Some alternatively call it “Clown World.” I prefer “Weimerica” as it more specific to what the United States has become recently and hints at a cataclysm yet to be.

This “guide” to Weimerica was written on the fly in-between back-to-back New England snowstorms, originally for an audience of one person. The genesis of this guide was the impending first-time visit to the US of a friend of mine from Lebanon. I wrote it not to show how bad things are, but instead to show how ugly things are. Not to frighten, but to inform on the many unpleasant realities that are all too quickly (and conveniently) forgotten about on a day-to-day basis. How indifference is the order of day despite the ever-tightening noose around the necks of most people.

So what is Weimerica, you ask? Read on and find out.

What is Weimerica?

Weimerica is….

…homicides being up 20% from 2014 (equivalent in raw numbers to more than the September 11th attacks).

…the 17,250 confirmed homicides of 2016 being more than any other year since 1997 (when there were 18,208).

…66,324 drug overdose deaths in a 12-month period (the Vietnam War saw 47,434 hostile deaths over 15+ years).

…44,193 suicides in 2015, with suicides being at 30-year highs in 2016, and suicide being one of the top ten causes of death in Weimerica.

…23,000,000,000 views on Pornhub in 2016 (729 per second every single day non-stop for the whole year) with there being only 7,466,964,000 people on Earth.

…70% of Weimerica being on prescription medication with 20% being on more than five medications at once (and life expectancy still dropping).

…real income showing little to no gains for decades on end.

…being worse off financially than your parents.

…a decrease in the average household income in New Jersey from 2005 to 2015.

…everything being fleetingly temporary, you won’t have that long lasting job, house, car, marriage, etc., like your parents and grandparents did.

…nearly half of all pregnancies being unintended.

…Weimerica is a colossal, dystopian shopping mall filled with 325 million atomized, rootless individuals with no common culture, cause, language, religion or background, united only by their shared consumerism (“Did you see the Giants game last night?” “Oh my Gawd, Stranger Thingssss!”).

The Motto for Weimerica: “NO LIVES MATTER”

A seven-time convicted felon and five-time deportee fatally shoots an innocent passerby in the back with a stolen 40-caliber Glock handgun on a public pier? Acquitted.

A crying father begging for his life shot to death crawling on his hands and knees towards a SWAT team aiming AR-15s and screaming at him? Acquitted.

A bride-to-be gunned down in front of her house in her pajamas when a police officer sitting in his squad car suddenly draws and fires pointblank into her face? No charges.

22,000 attend a country music festival surrounded by high walls and patrolled by security guards and police officers in the most heavily surveilled city in the Western hemisphere? Gunned down by the score with total impunity in the biggest mass shooting of all time.

926,190 abortions in 2014, with an estimated 98.3% being elective (meaning unrelated to rape/incest and medical complications).
Everything Is Fake

Zillow.com and other real estate websites photoshop clouds, grass, and trees around properties and present them in a way that makes them appear much larger and more modern than they actually are.

These two pictures are of the same person:
[pictures omited]

Wall Street rating agencies graded $400 billion worth of subprime mortgage bonds without knowing what was in them, giving many of them the highest “AAA” rating (effectively making them rating agencies in name only).

The 5-star Mandalay Bay hotel in Las Vegas employed an unregistered, unlicensed illegal immigrant as a security guard.

Love To Hate

Everything being either “awesome,” “insanely good,” or “the best ______ ever,” or “shit,” “shitty,” or “the worst _______ ever,” with little to no middle ground and/or reasoned opinions. For example, the discrepancy in reviews for The Last Jedi and nearly every one of the 100+ reviews I read for the Ford Fusion being either “BEST CAR EVER” or “Should be recalled, WORST CAR EVER.”

Every piece of media being heavily and ridiculously scrutinized down to the last detail for any inane reason to hate it. For instance, one of the top comments on a YouTube video for “Shout” by the Isley Brothers accused the video’s author of not including enough black people dancing in his/her photo montage and further asserting that this lack of inclusion was deliberate.

Hating something because it is successful/popular just to go against the grain. For instance, actual “professional” reviews of Dunkirk being “Yeah, yeah, it was great, but why weren’t women the main characters?” and “Yeah, it’s good, but Christopher Nolan and his Nolaniods….”

The hate-watching of TV shows (Keeping up with the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, etc.) propelling them to ultimate success.

Insane Anti-Social Atrocities Are The New Norm

4 out of the 5 worst mass shootings in Weimerican history took place in the past five years.

The worst mass shooting in US history (600+ gunned down) disappears from the news and thus collective consciousness in the space of a week.

The Sutherland Springs massacre (which featured babies being executed at pointblank range by rifle fire) disappears from the headlines within a day or two. This shooting would have ranked as the worst in Weimerican history as recently as 2007.

The mass shooting body count record for Weimerica was broken in 2017 a mere 15 months after the now-second worst mass shooting in Weimerican history occurred.

The firearms technology used in recent mass shootings has been around for decades, and gun laws as a whole have never been stricter and mental health resources have never been more available (remember 70% of the population is on prescription medication), so why is this happening now?

War Is The Default State

After 16+ years in Afghanistan and 14+ years in Iraq (and 6,935 total US deaths), war is the default state of Weimerica and no longer afforded special or notable status (in contrast, the major combat phase of the generation-defining Vietnam War was seven years).

0.4% of the population is active-duty military, meaning ~95% of the population most likely is not emotionally invested and/or cares minimally about whatever combat is/was taking place (or will take place).

The Everyday Absurdisms Of Weimerica

Prescription medication used to combat anxiety, depression, and suicidal/homicidal thoughts and actions causes anxiety, depression, and suicidal/homicidal thoughts and actions as a side effect.

A Rutgers University professor lamenting the Sandy Hook massacre so much that he made a YouTube video about it, but still believing in infanticide up to one year of age.

New Jersey has the highest paid police officers in the nation with an average salary of $100,000/year, but also has three cities in the top ten for “worst homicide rate” and those officers still have the right to shoot you to death if you don’t follow their conflicting orders to the letter while having a gun pointed at your head.

Parents working and saving money for twenty years to send their kids to college only for them to return home after graduation hating them, their country, and themselves in addition to being tens of thousands in debt.

One-fourth of graduates leaving college with a four year degree in hand are no better off than if they did not go to college at all from a wage perspective.

The maintenance staff at a college making more than most of the graduates of that college because they are unionized.

Consensual sex (“fuck me in the butt!!!”) being redefined as “rape” with such concepts as “enthusiastic consent” (Yes.=Rape, YES!=not rape), “continuing consent” (“ask every ten minutes if it’s okay to keep going”), and “affirmative consent” (“Can I hold your hand? Stroke your thigh? Whisper into your ear?”).

The wife of “American Sniper” Chris Kyle saying she married him because “he was a nice guy.”

“I do not care, I am a millionaire, I do not give AF.”

Some Classic Weimerican Quotes

“I was naked underneath my clothes.” ~A woman explaining her #metoo moment.

“CRAWL TOWARDS ME! IF YOU FALL, YOU BETTER FALL ON YOUR FACE!” ~A police officer’s reasonable and coherent order that must be obeyed upon penalty of death.

“He was turning his life around!” ~The classic family/friend lament of a dead victim/perpetrator with a less than stellar background.

“He changed into something he wasn’t.” ~The pathetic attempt of a high school chum of a mass shooter to cover up for the fact that he somehow missed what a psycho his friend was.

“Russian interference!” ~A viable excuse for anything and everything.

“The hoes are laughin’? YEP!” ~An exchange between a confused TV doctor and a 14-year-old aspiring female rap artist.

“He was COMPED!” ~The humblebrag of the coked up brother of a mass shooter/pasty.

“Stay in the car.”~A plea to do nothing and ignore the situation, whatever it may be.

When Did America Become Weimerica?

No firm answer, I first noticed it in the spring of 2009 when there was a constant stream of family murder-suicides and mass shootings, some of them recession related. Afghanistan also escalated that year (with death tolls doubling for both Britain and the US from the year prior) under the election promise of “I’ll get us out of Afghanistan, take that to the bank!”

Things really picked up steam in 2012 when large public mass shootings began occurring with increasing regularity, labor force participation hit a three decade low (meaning there was no economic recovery), and drug overdose deaths had already jumped 211% (in the Northeast) in comparison with 2010.

Shane #fundie youtube.com

(Shane is in a call with Matt Dillahunty and Tracie Harris on The Atheist Experience)

(Note: I have linked the full episode, starting where this snippet starts, for context if desired. A shorter version, containing only this, can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrfWs52Kjk0.)

Shane: Why is God so immoral?

Tracie: I don't know. Why don't you ask him? I would love to know why he's so freaking immoral.

Matt: I don't think that God exists, but if we're talking about the God character in the Bible, as God is represented--

Tracie: As he's written, it's horrible.

Matt: --it's a pretty horrible, jealous, angry being that advocates slavery. I don't know why he's that way, maybe he's just a dick.

Tracie: I said to somebody earlier today that you either have a God who sends child rapists to rape children or you have a God who simply watches it and says, When you're done, I'm going to punish you.

Shane: The child rape doesn't make you mad? I mean, do you hear about that and get angry? Yes or no?

Matt: What?

Tracie: Do you get angry when you hear about a child rapist?

Matt: Yes.

Shane: Well, so why shouldn't God get mad when he hears about evil in this world? Tell me that.

Matt: If there was a God and he heard about evil in this world, I think he should get mad.

Tracie: Well here's the thing, though, if I were in a situation where I could stop a child rapist, I would. That's the difference between me and your God.

Matt: Yeah.

Shane: Sorry, say that again?

Tracie: If I could stop a person from raping a child, I would. That's the difference between me and your God. He watches and says, "I'm shutting the door, and you go ahead and rape that child, and when you're done, I'm gonna punish you." If I did that, people would think I was a freakin' monster.

Matt: Yup.

Shane: First of all, you portrayed that little girl as someone who's innocent, she's just as evil as--

Tracie: Oh, I was thinking it was a little boy, so...

Matt: (hangs up) Bye.

Tracie: So, children deserve to get raped, there's your--

Matt: Goodbye. Goodbye, you piece of shit!

Tracie: And I would like to just say that, well, let me just say, I was raised in a different Christianity, and it was a better one.

Matt: Yeah. You know what, I was a better Christian than you when I was a Christian, and I still am.

If you still have any faith in humanity, do not read

Not joking, skip it, hit the next one, it's just that nasty.

Tom Martin #sexist manboobz.com

But pedophiles who pay children for sex are not really rapists, because the child consents, then performs the act, indicating they understand the nature of the contract. The elder is still a pedophiles, but the child prostitute is still a prostitute.

If the child is enslaved – it’s rape, or too young or stupid to know what he or she’s doing – rape. But poor, and in need of food? Not rape. A choice. Unwilling to do other hard labour paying 9 times less than the prostitution route? Not rape. A choice.

I think there are a too few prostitute feminists on this blog who will do anything to perpetuate the tax-free lifestyle prostitutes are currently legally entitled to in most places.

Prostitution tax avoidance and accountability avoidance opportunities need to be shut down.
If a grown woman would make the argument she’s a prostitute due to being victim of circumstance, then a child will be encouraged to make the same argument. Set a better example.

Whatever your age, follow the golden rule, of never taking money for sex, then prostitution will be eradicated. Only the prostitute can stop charging for sex.

And of course, that means rejecting courtship gifts, engagement gifts, marriage gifts, divorce gifts, and government largess also.

I don’t think many of you are ready to renounce prostitution in all its forms.

It’s such a simple course of action – but manboobzers will conspire to make it seem ridiculous, unquantifiable, un-knowable and so on.

I know a whore when I see one.

Caesercel #sexist #psycho #wingnut incels.co

[Serious] Is Rape really such a bad thing?

Before the soyim piss their pants, hear me out on this one.

Rape in modern society is very different from what it originally was. The abhorrent and evil crime of rape was originally about defiling another man's woman thus cucking him and possibly impregnating his wife. Thus diminishing his rightful chance at a legitimate offspring. Consent(the base of modern concept of rape), doesn't come into the picture. Husbands in olden times never needed consent from their wife, sex was a duty to be fulfilled, for family and community. There were also conquerers wifing up conquered people's women. Still no consent.

We can easily see that throughout history, the women never actually chose who they're gonna fuck. Men competed and the winners got to take their pick.

Modern rape( the one based on lack of consent) is a recent feminist construct. According to that logic almost all sex, that got humanity to where it is now, the reason why we all exist, is rape. In fact certain radical feminist groups unironcally proclaim that all sex is rape, even when its consensual. They want women to abandon heterosexual partnership and procreate via sperm banks. More moderate feminists would say that earning consent by using the situations of a women is also rape. According to them, escorting, beta-buxxing, sugar-dady relationships are also rape where the rapist is forcing consent by using women in bad financial situation.

So I pose this question....Is rape, the way it is defined now, such a bad thing? It allowed men and women to procreate. Allowed humanity to grow and prosper instead of dying out. Allowed people to live fulfulling sexual lives and build families. Is it so bad that we don't want to give much concern to something fickle like "consent" and instead want redistribution of sexual opportunities among the masses?

This is why people hate us. What used to happen before is not relevant now, we've evolved. Yes men would go around raping women, but they'd also fight and kill other men in the process. Saying rape isn't bad because that's how it used to be is like saying we should go back to times when men fought and killed each other for women. I guess some people here would think that that's the way it should be, what do I know.

The sex between a husband and wife is rape as well. As the husband is using patriarchal oppression to force sex upon a women who'd rather fuck chad(5% of men).
Is that arrangement also unwanted according to you?

Rape isn't. I think it's marginally worse than a brutal physical assault. Which...isn't great either, to be fair, but rape is not something that should warrant a significantly harsher criminal penalty than, say, grievous bodily harm.

Yes rape where a man hurts a woman should be a crime. It is a little more worse than assault. But in a world running rampant with whores with 20+ body counts. Where birth control flow like water. Is it still such a crime. And certain kind of "rape" like a woman fulfilling a duty to her husband or an escort serving a unwiliingly serving a client she is not attracted to should not be considered crime at all.

We got a lot of people here who think actual rape is fine. You put those people and their family in that situation and you will see how quickly their opinions change.

I am against sexual assault, if that is what you are implying. But there are reasons why these things are considered so abhorrent. And those reasons are floundered daily in modern era. Would you rather allow women to have a choice and become cumdumpsters for chad?

I'm not angry at them, they have better options than me. I would fuck the hottest woman I could get as well, that's human nature. I'm upset at the system that incentives for women to only fuck the top tier men and rewards them for having bastard children. I'm upset at women but what they're doing is completely logical, what's not logical is why there are no legal brothels for us to go to, why single mothers get free money, that's the shit I'm angry about.

You are upset at this system. But the system that allows you to get a woman would be considered that of a patriarchal rapist. This is contradictory. If you actually support the current system where women can congregate to top tier men then the only thing you have right to be upset about is, you were not one of those men.
Thus there is nothing you could possibly do. I am sorry but this thinking is too pussy. Its like a poor serf saying he deserves it for not being born with god's royal grace.

Sure, you can go ahead and try to do that but it will come with severe consequences.

Not if it is done in a civilized manner. Traditional marriage is one example. Roasties actually had to fuck men bellow their looksmatch. Blackpill tells us that the roastie doesn't want that guy and so it would be rape. But there are little consequence cuz the system is not build by cucks.

women are hypergamous, any man beneath 6.5/10 is seen as ugly by them

men meanwhile are attracted to majority of women if they aren't fat

The only reason humanity got this far is cuz women never really had a choice on the matter of reproduction.

Low IQ post.

If you wouldn't like to be held down and fucked against your will don't do it to others.

Moneymaxx and escortcel.

Choice can be manuafactured under the right circumstances. Escorting ,as you mentioned is one example.

If she's a virgin, it's bad.
But if she's a whore and it's dick #54968596, it's not a big deal, about as bad as assault.

But that's the thing. Raping virgin is bad exactly cuz she is another man's rightful first. But the modern gynocentric system spits on this very concept

It doesn't have to be violent and unsavory. Civilized redistribution of sexual resources is possible. Women could be raised to be dutiful, even to men like us that they biologically repel. Read the thread

anonymousguy #fundie neoseeker.com

I'm pro-man's choice. I believe in a man's right to choose. The life growing inside the woman is 50% his, and I don't believe that the woman has a right to kill that life unless the father consents.
That's the only thing I'm hardcore about when it comes to this issue.

A woman's right to choose. I really hate that phrase. It's all just a very pretty nothing meant to make a horrendous act seem like a god given unimpeachable right. Next thing you know they'll be taking away our guns.

Honestly "a woman's right to choose" falls under the idea of "rationalising what's wrong" that I went over a few posts ago. It's this idea that you can come up with whatever excuse you need to to make abortion right in your head.

What about a man's right to choose? If I get a girl pregnant, she can go have an abortion, without my consent. She can choose to murder my child, without my consent at all, no matter what my beliefs on the matter. I'd actually feel a whole lot more comfortable about the issue of abortion if the fathers were given any consideration whatsoever. As it is, it seems women's "unimpeachable rights as americans" trump over integrity and decency in the end.

A woman's right to choose is a load of crap. It's gussying up something really quite ugly: That any woman at any time, simply feeling overwhelmed at the idea of being a mother, can just decide she doesn't want the responsibility, and terminate her child. For no better reason than she just doesn't want to deal with a kid right now in her life.

I think a good compromise would be to reform abortion laws like this:

1) In order for a doctor to perform an abortion, he must have the consent of BOTH parents. The man and the woman. A woman has no right to terminate a mans child without his consent.
2) The only exception is in cases of rape. In those cases a police report would have to have been filed within a certain timeframe after the rape, before the first missed period, to prevent overwhelmed mothers from crying rape just to get an abortion.
3) Any case for an abortion, excepting the cases of rape, must be reviewed before a judge. Financial standing and any mental disorders present in the mother must be taken in to account. If at the end of the day, the judge finds the mother is both financially able to support the child, and mentally capable of taking care of the child, the abortion is denied.

Well technically I'm not an anarchist. It's just easier to say I'm an anarchist than it is to say "I hate the american government, all current forms of government, and want a revolution, but I believe in old fashioned morals and religion and I don't believe a society could exist without some form of government." So though I proclaim to be an anarchist it is only because it allows me to fight our current form of government and society without a big fat explanation.

Yes that seems hypocritical but I really don't care. Revolution, defying conventions, defying society and authority; I share all those ideals with anarchists, but I don't believe in some of the more extreme views of anarchy. So I figure I might as well just call myself an anarchist.
So what if I hate authority. It is only because our current form of authority is stupid, irresponsible, hypocritical, greedy, and abusive. That doesn't mean that I would allow little children to be killed because I'm "supposed" to hate laws and government.

And it's not that I view pregnancy as a crime. It's that I view promiscuity as a crime. If you are stupid and sleep around than you're an idiot and you need to deal with the consequences of your stupid actions instead of punishing the unborn life you created through your stupid actions.
Two wrongs don't make a right and killing an innocent child because he/she is a child of rape is wrong. Carry the child, then if you really don't want it give it to a family who does.

[You cannot force a woman to go through the nine months of pregnancy just because the guy wants the child. It's the woman's body, it's her choice. I do however, feel that the father should at least be notified before an abortion because, for me, I'd be royally pissed if I suddenly found out that a girl had had an abortion without telling me. I wouldn't have tried to change her mind, I wouldn't have tried to influence her, I'd just want to know.]

*bleep* that. Seriously, *bleep* that whole mentality. I don't give a shit if it's her body. She shouldn't have spread her legs in the first place if she didn't want to take that risk. AS THE FATHER, I should have a say in whether or not my child is murdered, period, end of *bleep*ing story. I *bleep*ING HATE that mentallity that just because it's not in MY stomache, means I have no parental rights over the child. That's bullshit to the nth degree tyvm. It's still my *bleep*ing child.

I've been saying this for years. I disagree that a man shouldn't have to pay child support, but what really gets me hot is when people start going on about "a woman's right to choose" in regards to an abortion. If the father for religious, moral, or other reasons doesn't believe in abortion, well he's shit out of luck. He has no say in the process whatsoever and has to live forever knowing that his child was (at least in his mind) murdered and there was nothing he could do about it. Frankly, I won't be happy with abortion being a viable option until the clinics start requiring BOTH parent's consent, or a no contest (basically the man has not signed either a consent or nonconsent form, thus waiving his rights entirely, in which scenario, just as in no contest divorce cases, he must LEGALLY be informed that the mother is sueing for the right to an abortion and giving him roughly 30 days to respond with either a cease and desist or a go ahead).

That's the only way I will EVER be comfortable with abortion being legal.

manofire #sexist coalpha.org

[Bolding in original]

Eurasian males are the humiliated degraded broken sons of White Dads. They have no claim to their White Dad's right to white women.

Arab and Indian Men are just as rejected by white women, but at least they know how to rape them and turn them into sex slaves. Muslims are facing a Holocaust in Europe, but they are still not afraid to rape, and seduced into prostitution thousands of white girls.

You can blame dating on female choice. But the lack of Asian men raping white women, is solely the fault of the man.

Should Hapa men redeem themselves by raping white women in a revolutionary act?

"In the most controversial part of the book, Cleaver acknowledges committing acts of rape, stating that he initially raped black women in the ghetto "for practice" and then embarked on the serial rape of white women. He described these crimes as politically inspired, motivated by a genuine conviction that the rape of white women was "an insurrectionary act".[2] When he began writing Soul on Ice, he unequivocally renounced rape and all his previous reasoning about it.[4][6] However, he refused to show any remorse for his career as a rapist, or acknowledge any debt to society, claiming in Soul on Ice that "the blood of Vietnamese peasants has paid off all my debts".[2]

If a Black Panther Mormon can rape white women, using the blood of Vietnam as his excuse, how much more right do Amerasian men have?

Is the most revolutionary think Hapa boys can do rape White women who share the white race of their Fathers?

I'm not an advocate of criminality. I merely ask if Hapas are in the same revolutionary position as Eldridge Cleaver.

Is the Hapa destiny to be solved in the rape of white women?

It makes me kind of angry that they have turned me into such a loser. By letting the Asian race sink so low. Ok it is women who do the sexual selection. But Asian Men could rape more. They have so many comics about rape, but they dont actually rape. White women's opinions don't matter in rape. You can't get rejected by rape. Look at Arab men. White Europe is on the verge of having a Holocaust against Arabs, but that doesn't stop them from raping white women. Your about to be exterminated, and your still raping. That takes balls.

So yes as a Hapa guy, I do hate Asian men for not being rapists enough. Would it hurt my feelings if I had a reputation as a rapist based on my race? beats being a eunuch. rape is totally in the man's control, and asian men can't even do that. I never hear cases of Asian men raping white women. And if Arabs can do it so can they.

Am I hypocrite, since I;m not a rapist myself? Look I'm an aspie retard mutant freak, I could never pull it off. Is the whole Asian race, filled with man-children like me, who cant even rape?

Asian men have betrayed me in 2 ways. 1st they were assholes to me in person, throughout my life. and 2nd they have let their reputation and therfore my reputation sink to shit. And some forms of sex are in their control period.

Itisamuh #sexist mmo-champion.com


I often see grown men eyeing up girls school girls. Is this wrong?
So I moved to a new area a while ago and basically it's located nearby a secondary school (high school) so I bump into a lot of children in school uniforms on the morning commute where I can't help but notice adult men checking girls out. There is something wrong with this imo, like the girls where I live wear knee-length skirt and usually don't wear any tights with it so men tend to get an eyeful on the bus/train and 8 times out of 10 you can expect an adult male trying to eye the bottom of a teenage school girl.I think it's disgusting.


So you think people are not supposed to look at attractive members of the opposite sex when they are at their most prime age? Good luck avoiding that. And it is not just adult men and teenage girls. Middle aged women will scream and whistle and throw their panties at good looking teenage male stars.

Sex to me is a lot more than just biology. Just because someone is capable of breeding doesn't mean they're mentally prepared for it. Some may "grow" up faster than others but under 18 is still a child in my eyes. Hell, even 18-19 is still a child in my eyes. Personally I'd make the aoc 21 but the law disagrees. Either way I think its wrong and predatory for older people to go after people at such a young age.

I have the opposite view, that the age of consent should be much lower because people much younger than that are going to be having sex. Why make it illegal for no good reason when they are going to do it anyway? When you try to judge whether someone was mentally ready for it, whether they were seduced or used and so on, you are throwing way too many subjective factors in for it to be decided by an arbitrary cutoff.

pfta2a #fundie archive.is

There is this assumption about pedophiles that we are all monsters, that we are all out to rape children. It is incorrect. There may be some bad apples, but the vast majority do not want this.
We enjoy children, it is easier for us to connect with them emotionally. We enjoy relationships with them. We do not want to hurt them (for most hurting a child is the last thing they'd do).
Most people attracted to another adult don't want to rape that person. They want the emotional and romantic attachment. Sex is part of that, but not the whole (and not even that big of a part).
Similarly most pedophiles (including myself) want a relationship with a child. We would not rape a child. The sexual attraction is part of it, but not a huge piece. There are a few bad apples in both groups. And with pedophiles consensual sex is still legally rape, which makes it easier to break the law.
Morally I think sex between an adult and child should be legal, as I believe a child is capable of consent (and there is plenty of evidence that many children are sexual). But I follow the law.
However, I do cuddle with children, hug them, tickle them, rough-house with them or hold their hands. There's mountains of evidence that touch is beneficial. As long as it is consensual (and I am very careful to make sure that it is) there is no harm - and plenty of benefit - from these activities. I'm not planning to molest a child (I'm not sexually attracted to many of the children I interact with), just doing things that we can both legally enjoy.

handfulsoffireworks #fundie handfulsoffireworks.tumblr.com

[[Actually, my abortion after my rape did solve a lot of problems. It solved the fact that I was going to kill myself before I stayed pregnant. It solved the disgust and physical sickness I had whenever I thought about it in there growing. It solved my need to not be pregnant. And to this day, years later, I am grateful and happy I had access to the care I needed. So don’t you dare pretend that you are not harming women by taking away their rights to their bodies under false claims. You know what harms women? When they are forced to do something with their body that they don’t want to do. Like when I was raped. Or like what you would like to have done to me by forcing me to carry a clearly unwanted pregnancy for nine months and then give birth.

In my experience pro lifers have two responses to my story- both are disturbing. First, they tell me that an innocent child shouldn’t have to suffer and that I should have chosen adoption. If you can that easily brush off a living, breathing persons depression, brokenness and suicidal thoughts for a fetus, then I really don’t have anything to say to you. You lack any bit of compassion and empathy and that is really sad.

If you do find some bit of empathy and tell me the second usual response, that “oh I make an exception for rape”. That just infuriates me. First, you are admitting that you do not actually care about the “baby” as you claim to. You care about punishing women for consensual sex and that is sick. Second, do you even put any ounce of thought into your little exception that you think is so kind of you? Obviously not because if you did you would know it would be a shit show. Do you know who I’ve told in my real life about my rape? My counselor. That’s it. How would your exception work? Would I have to relive the worst event of my life to police, doctors? Would they be deciding if I was believable enough to get to make choices about my own body? Would they be deciding if what I went through was bad enough to make it acceptable? Would I be proving my right to my own body weeks after it had been taken from me? Fuck that.

My body is mine to decide what I do or do not do with it. I do not have to jump through hoops, or prove my right to it or justify what I do with it to anyone. This is my body. Mine. Stop acting like you have any say in it and stop the bull shit act that you care. You don’t. ]]


nobody would have forced you to kill yourself. the depression and suicide is a personal battle. nobody can force you to do anything
the idea that the baby being a reminder of rape is like the possessions of a loved one who died. if someone dies and their belongings in the area make someone sad, removing those belongings aren’t going to erase the memory of that person or their death. just like how abortion isn’t going to erase the memory of the rape or the fact that it happened. in a way, it’s blaming the child for being associated with the rape.
and yes, it’s tragic when something happens to someone that is unwanted. it’s unfortunate that you were raped. i’m sorry that it happened. but it’s too bad the baby gets the shorter end of the stick on this one.
my response to your story isn’t that you shouldn’t have aborted it. it’s already been done. there’s no point in saying that. the child is gone and what was done can’t be undone.
and yes i would put the life of an unborn child above depression and suicidal thoughts of a person because depression will not necessarily kill someone. people can reach out for help with their depression. it might take years and years but it’s possible to overcome it. i’ve done it. i’ve wanted to commit suicide before many times. but i didn’t because i remind myself that it’s unreasonable to sacrifice life just to satisfy my emotions. nobody forced me to kill myself and nobody forced me to not do it. abortion is like an easy way out of that except the price is someone else’s life. and i make no exception for rape.
your body is yours and yes, you decide what you want to do with it. nobody is stopping you. but getting an abortion in a clinic is not just what you do to your body. someone else has to do it to your body for you. also, with the case of the baby, it’s also the child’s body, not just the mother.
the baby’s body is the baby’s and should not have to prove its right to it. it’s the baby’s body. and i’m not acting like i have any say in it. i truthfully believe everything i say on this matter won’t change anyone’s mind. i don’t have that kind of power and probably never will.
but i do care about the well being of others [yeah right] and my points on abortion were derived through reasoning and morality, not opinion. my contemplation on the issue of abortion shouldn’t define whether or not i have compassion or not. i don’t feel worse for either the mother or the child. i’m looking at this issue from a non-emotional point. i’m looking for the solution that is least damaging.
and so far, the pro-life and adoption duo seems to be the winner.

Fell #fundie forums.spacebattles.com

[ Why is rape considered evil?]

A variety of factors. Part of it is reasonable, modern female empowerment. Part of it is ancient, outmoded "Sacred Feminine" bullshit. Yet another part is even more outmoded, frankly offensive 'Sacred virginity' tradition.


I really, really hate this discussion, because my opinion on it makes it seem like I hate women or something, and I really don't. But I don't think rape is nearly as heinous a crime as people think it is. It's awful, certainly, but for some reason we've elevated it to one of the worst things a person can do, and I think that reputation that it has ends up making it's victims suffer more than if it were considered only slightly worse than normal assault.

[So you see it as society trying to make a crime especially heinous because society says it is a especially heinous crime?]

Basically, yes. I think it persists via cultural inertia going back a long, long time. The reasoning behind it has changed, but the cultural meme has remained largely the same. For whatever reason, we've essentially declared vaginas sacred and we see those who "Desecrate" them as a special kind of evil; it's the kind of emotional response we usually reserve for people who hurt children, or who torture people.

I honestly think it's a sexist idea. That women are these precious, fragile jewels that need harsh laws and big strong men to protect their sacred genitalia.


Yes, rape is absolutely wrong. But the degree of emotional response we have for it is completely out of proportion to the actual severity of the violation. And I think it hurts women.

[How many people suffer life long psychological trauma from getting punched or kicked a few times?]


I imagine if you were told your entire life that punching you in the face was the most awful act anyone could do to you, you'd find it pretty traumatic if you ended up getting punched in the face.

You're also missing the point; there are many different situations in which rape is entirely non-traumatic. A date rape victim could go their entire life not knowing they'd ever been raped, but if they found out about it, it's still treated with as much vitriol as if they'd been bludgeoned, held down, and violated in the street.


[Your inflicting pain and suffering on some one for a sex /power kick.
You can't come up with any justification for it.]

And all the various kinds of rape where the victim doesn't suffer, and may in fact be entirely unaware of what happened?

Granted it'd be hard to justify those either, but not all rape is sadistic, or violent. It's a generalization people have made for some reason.

The most common drugs used in these assaults cause either complete unconsciousness or anterograde amnesia. Plenty of date rapists use lubrication and condoms, and even if they don't, the suffering of the victim is clearly not their intended goal, or they'd have left them conscious.

It's just moronic to assume that every rape MUST be motivated by sadism and power fantasies.


[So date raping someone is a less severe crime because they don't remember it?

That's some quality bullshit right there.]

that depends entirely on your own view of how justice is supposed to work.

As a sometime utilitarian, I think Justice is supposed to punish people with a severity scaled linearly to how much suffering they cause. If nobody actually suffers as a result of your crime, it isn't a very severe crime in my eyes.


[Please tell someone who suffered date rape that they didn't really suffer. Then let me know how that went for you.]

Anecdotes aren't evidence, this argument is not, has never been, and will never be persuasive. I'd also argue that they wouldn't suffer near as much if we didn't treat their vaginas like the arc of the covenant.

The fact of the matter is, if nobody told them, they'd go on with their lives without a worry in the world. They would be completely unharmed by the experience right up until the moment you chose to hurt them by giving them the knowledge of what had happened.

[Forcing someone down and raping or sodomizing them against their will, possibly giving them a disease in the process that could change how they live for the rest of their life, violating a person's privacy and body for simple physical pleasure is just sick.]

So I must ask, again, what about nonviolent rape with lubrication and protection?


[Fell, what is your suggested position on the punishment of someone who has been convicted of drugging women for the purpose of having sex with them while they are unconscious?]


It should directly correspond to the suffering, inconvenience, and loss of security felt by the victim. As a general rule of thumb; more than groping someone, less than sexually assaulting them while they're fully awake and aware.

caamib #sexist whygodwhy.org

I have and I still believe I'd have sex with a woman against her consent. The difference now is that when I wrote that I thought that rape is forceful sex against a woman's consent. I was wrong, since I didn't know enough history and was brainwashed my feminist propaganda. Rape is a crime against women's owner or her chastity and consent is irrelevant for women. In fact, should you expect it you're bound to be seen as a complete loser by a woman. All that anti-rape propaganda is actually aimed to keep dumbasses who believe women even want to consent away from getting any sex whatsoever.

So while I'd still forcibly have a sex with a woman I'd never rape, since I wouldn't have forcible sex with a woman who is somebody's property or chaste.

Silentscream #fundie neoseeker.com

Rape victims are an entirely different case. Rape is a very horrible thing and no female should ever experience that kind of tragedy, but if a girl ends up getting raped, and she gets pregnant, why abort the baby? In doing so, it only makes the mother selfish because she would only be thinking of herself. Think about it this way: rape victims don't truly recover. Ask any woman who has had it happen to them; they tend to forget about it as the years go by, and they learn to live with the past, but in the back of their minds they are still grieving over what happened to them. Even if the mother aborts the child, she is still at risk of being traumatized for life. Having the child there would play no significant role in the mothers depression because she is still going to cry, and scream, and rant every chance they get. It's not the baby's fault so it should not suffer.


[Many reasons. Maybe she doesn't want to constantly be reminded of the rape every time she looks at the child. Maybe she doesn't want a child to someone who has violated her. Maybe she doesn't want to go through nine months of pain, only to give birth to a child that wasn't made through love.

If a woman is raped, then I think they have every right to be 'selfish' just for once and get rid of the baby, if they choose to. What's wrong with being selfish every once in a while?

You say that she will still go through all the pain, suffering and depression... But she will eventually get on with life. Having a baby as a constant reminder of it isn't exactly going to help with the moving on.]


You bring up some good points, but we don't live in disney. We're not all made through love. I wasn't expected, many of my friends have told me they weren't expected either. The fact of the matter is, no child should suffer because of the crimes committed by any of these sick freaks. It's like killing another human being because someone related to them broke the law. Everyone deserves to be selfish every once in a while, but not when they are deciding whether a baby should live or not. At least out it up for adoption.

[So a mother should have a child ... because life isn't like Disney? Well those rape-victim mothers can sure as hell try to make their lives a little bit happier, at least!

A child is hardly suffering if it's being aborted a few weeks into the pregnancy. Maybe if you kill the child when it's five years old for having a sick father THEN it would be cruel.
A mother IS suffering by keeping a baby she does not want.

And put it up for adoption? So she still goes through nine months of pain, only to give birth to a child that wasn't made through love, then she gives it away?
Why should a rape victim have to go through so much more worry (pregnancy, adoption, etc) when there's a much easier option?]

Again, not everyone is made through love. I don't care if the baby is 5 years old or 5 minutes old, it's still a living, breathing, developing human being. It feels pain. Inside the mother it feeds off of everything she puts in her body in order to live. Killing the baby is not going to help the mother in her depression, if anything, it would just add to it when she realizes she killed her first child.


Giving birth is a natural occurrence. Actually, a normal child birth is not considered an emergency UNLESS there presents complications. Moreover, life-threatening complications for the mother could be detected at an early stage and if they are then by all means abort the baby. We don't want the mother to die. But in the natural process of giving birth. the mother goes through pain, but it's does not affect her life-span. Your whole argument is based on solely the fact that the mother was forced into the birth, which itself is wrong and I do see your point but we're getting into something much greater when we talk about whether the baby should be aborted because you are snatching them of life. My point is simple, I've said it once and I'll say it again, the mother WILL STILL go through pain and suffering even if the child is killed. If she doesn't want to see her kid, then put it up for adoption. Don't take its life because of a crime it did not commit.

Rick Wiles #fundie rightwingwatch.org

“Hillary Clinton is telling up front what this is all about,” he said. “She’s bragging it’s about Pizzagate. She’s telling them, ‘We took you down, you dared talk about our filthy child molestation and we took you down.’ That’s what she’s saying.” (Flynn’s son has avidly promoted the Pizzagate conspiracy theory, causing him to lose his job in the administration’s transition team, and Flynn himself has also embraced many wild conspiracy theories, including one linking Clinton to “sex crimes [with] children.”)

Wiles asserted that “devil-worshiping, Luciferian, demon-possessed maniacs” have formed a “criminal cabal [that is] running this nation and much of the world” that allows them to engage in “child trafficking, child molestation, child rape, [and] child murder.”

When the truth is finally revealed, Wiles warned, “there will be mass vomiting in the society when the people find out what these demon-possessed rulers have been doing for decades with children.”

“Many of the key officials, elected and appointed, and in corporate board rooms and in Hollywood and in New York City, they are part of a global child molestation ring,” said Wiles, who insisted that Clinton is now “relishing in the fact that they brought down General Flynn because he knows what they are and what they’re doing.”

james-the-map #fundie james-the-map.tumblr.com

If y'all were “devoting so much time and effort into helping children stay safe” you’d realize that you shouldn’t work with or around children at all - that you should avoid being around and interacting with children as much as possible - cause your pedophilic attraction to them makes you a potential threat to children no matter how “non offending” and “in control” you think you are.

Everyone is a potential threat to everyone else.
There are more cases of an adult raping a minor when the adult is not a MAP then there are that are.

Should all adults stay away from children?
How about children that rape other children? I mean, I guess they should get help right….. but not from an adult, because of the potential threat.

No, that rant ain’t got shit to do with what I wrote. I’m not saying that all adults are threats, or that child on child rape don’t happen, or that you can’t rape a child without being a pedophile. I’m just saying that if you have urges to sexually abuse children, you should stay away from children as much as physically possible because YOU individually are a potential threat due to your sexual attraction to children.


Attraction != Threat
Wanting sex with X != threat to person X.

If you are attracted to someone who is not attracted to you back, do you avoid them at all cost because you believe you’re a threat, and that you may rape them?

Despite how much you all pretend minor attraction doesn’t work like the rest of the attractions…. they do. Having an attraction towards anyone, no matter the classification of attraction, DOES NOT MEAN you’re more of a threat to that person.

I am not a threat to anyone. I have never raped anyone, and I will never rape anyone, whether attracted to them or not.

Your complete lack of understanding in this area does not mean that I must be a rapist waiting to happen.

Sandi In El #fundie premierchristianity.com


Sandi in EL: consensual, or rape - it was still homosexual sex.
The first offer was sex - and Lot offered his daughters to satiate the men. The second offer was force, even being blinded by the angels, the homosexual lust pushed the men on for homosexual sex.
They could have had women, they wanted men - and their lust caused them to be blinded.
God did not allow one out of S&G but Lot and his family. Not one homosexual was considered righteous enough to be brought out of S&G.
It was homosexuality
Learn your Bible, Gug
btw - where is your scripture where the Lord endorses the sin of homosexuality? Thanks

Guglielmo Marinaro : Yes, and the incident of attempted homosexual rape in Sodom (Genesis 19) does not make all homosexual sex wrong, just as the incident of consummated heterosexual rape in Gibeah (Judges 19) does not make all heterosexual sex wrong.
There was no offer of sex, as the text itself plainly shows. That is just your invention, which you are trying dishonestly to add to the narrative. The men of Sodom demanded that Lot bring out his guests to be gang-raped. Lot rightly refused, but then despicably offered them his daughters to rape instead. Yes, they turned down the women, because it was the visitors that they wished to abuse and humiliate, and they resented Lot, an immigrant, passing judgment on them. They then told Lot that they would treat him even worse, thus confirming that rape had been their intention from the start.
The concept of a city in which every single man was homosexual is beyond any sane, intelligent person’s threshold of credulity.
Learn your Bible, Sandi. You can invent things to your heart’s content, but please stop deceitfully claiming that they’re in the Bible. Thanks.

Sandi in EL: Yes it does make all homosexual sex wrong and Christ confirmed that with Leviticus.
There was an offer of sex and Lot offered his daughters to protect the me.
N, we've been here before, "to know" is the term used with Adam and Eve and Eve was not raped.
You don't offer sex to those you wish to abuse and humiliate.
Lot passed judgment because of their evil - homosexuality
You don't want to believe Christ, that's fine. Don't call yourself a follower of Christ then.
You are the one denying Biblical truths, Gug . Learn your Bible
le

Guglielmo Marinaro: No, it does not make all homosexual sex wrong any more than the story of the heterosexual gang rape at Gibeah makes all heterosexual sex wrong. The unknown authors of Leviticus make no mention whatever of Sodom in their clumsily worded condemnation of sex between men.
No, you don’t offer sex to those whom you wish to abuse and humiliate, and the men of Sodom didn’t offer sex to the visiting angels. That is purely an invention of yours, as the text conclusively shows. They just demanded that Lot bring out his guests to be gang-raped.
Yes, we have been here before, and you are repeating the same faulty argument as before. The Hebrew verb, yada‘, “to know” when used as a sexual euphemism, refers to sexual congress. It does not imply that the sex is consensual; it may or may not be. The context in which it is used in the Sodom story makes it plain that it refers there to attempted rape, and the very same verb is used of the rape of the Levite’s concubine at Gibeah (Judges 19:25). But you know this perfectly well already, because I have previously pointed it out to you at least twice. By continuing to repeat that crooked argument you are proving your deliberate dishonesty.
Sandi, since you have made plain your determination to keep reiterating – in the teeth of the clear evidence of the text itself – your untruthful claim that your fabrication is part of the Sodom narrative, I won’t waste time on any further discussions with you. There is little point in debating with someone as intellectually dishonest as you are.

Sandi in EL: cut the editorial, and show me scripture when Christ defends the sin

....

Sandi in EL: still no scripture Gug? You cannot show where Christ endorses homosexuality?
I've shown you where you are wrong on this before. Look back (edit)

Wayne Allen Root #wingnut #fundie #conspiracy creators.com

I'm a God-fearing and God-loving American patriot. I am a Jew who took Jesus Christ as my savior almost 30 years ago. Today, I feel the devil all around us, like never before in my lifetime ... in any lifetime. This coronavirus crisis has the devil's evil fingerprints all over it. Not certain I'm right?

If I were the devil, if evil were my middle name, I'd love the deep state, the corrupt Washington, D.C., swamp and, most of all, its PR division, the liberal media. I'd love big government, globalists, communists, socialists and Marxists — anyone who would put the American people in misery and slavery. I'd dedicate my life to anything and anyone who'd destroy the American dream, opportunity and mobility. Because, of course, the devil loves misery. I'd want to enslave the American people to big government, ruin their exceptionalism, make them ordinary citizens of a global army of serfs. I'd want to turn the positive, wonderful, exceptional lives of prosperous American business owners into lives of misery, malaise and poverty. I'd want America to be no different than Cuba, Venezuela, Haiti or Mexico. Why should America escape my misery and pain? I'd give my support to anyone who'd take the American dream away. And more than anything, I'd hate President Donald J Trump. I'd hate anyone who wants to make America great again. I'd want to wipe that smirk right off the faces of Americans who love their country and God. I'd want them to suffer.

To accomplish all this ... I'd want to create a pandemic just like the coronavirus.

It would wipe away all of Trump's amazing, magical and miraculous economic achievements of the past three years ... in just a matter of a few shocking, depressing, tragic weeks. It would crash the stock market; collapse the oil and energy markets; kill over 30 million jobs; close the entire U.S. economy; shutter millions of small businesses. It would turn tens of millions of Americans into welfare addicts and wards of the state; eliminate Trump's 20,000-person stadium rallies; overwhelm the entire economic system; bring business owners to their knees; and make big government the only option to save a drowning nation no longer so "exceptional." It would make Americans hide in their homes, accept government telling them whether their businesses are "essential," deciding whether they can earn a living or not, deciding whether they can gain access to a potentially life-saving anti-malaria drug protocol or not. I'd root for a massive overreaction that leaves America shocked, depressed and weakened. And the government's reaction would be to spend so much money it would leave America crippled by unimaginable debt for decades to come. I'd laugh and do a dance to celebrate all the rich and powerful business owners left with nothing, reduced to begging big government to bail them out. And obviously, I'd hate Christianity more than even America or Trump.

I'd create something so vile and frightening it would close down churches and prevent Easter church services for the first time in the history of America. As a bonus, I'd want everyone in America to be not only broke, scared and humbled but also miserable. So, I'd eliminate all sports; close down movie theaters; shut down Las Vegas, air travel and cruise ships; cancel vacations and weddings. There would be no way out — except misery, depression and loneliness. Sex? All dating would be canceled. No one could come within six feet of each other. Except for Neil Ferguson, the U.K. scientist who scammed the whole world with hysterical, exaggerated claims and then apparently violated social distancing to have an affair with a married woman. That Ferguson is my kind of guy — a real devil!

bigcrawfish #fundie military.com

[Comment on article entitled "Justice Delayed for Green Beret Who Defended Afghan Boy From Rapist"]

If the child would have been transgender, gay, liberal, nuts, have AIDS, been a deserter, a traitor, or something that Obama's military could recognize that's worth saving, the Sergeant would have been given a medal and sent on his way. But no, this was a normal child held as a slave and being raped by a gay man.

If Obama prosecutes the Green Beret, he's essentially telling the Army that gay rape is acceptable behavior and should not be interfered with or you'll be court martialled. If Obama doesn't prosecute the Sergeant, he's saying that gay child rape is unacceptable and should be interfered with and stopped.

Whatever will Obama do? His gay constituency is awaiting the answer!! The NAMBLA vote is at risk. Lastly, this will certainly be an election issue. I can't wait for Trump or Cruz to hear the news that the Sergeant is prosecuted...one of them will hang Hillary and the liberals with it. If part of the Obama/liberal platform is to approve of slavery and child rape, then what is the difference between liberals and ISIS? Well, if I were Trump or Cruz, that's how I'd phrase it.

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

image

Image says: “Yes, I am a Christian. I believe in the Bible. I do not support homosexuality or “homosexual marriage”. Yes, I still love you. Yes, we are still friends. No, I am not judging you. No, I am not condemning you to hell. No, I will not let anyone bully you. But realize that name-calling and stereotyping those of us who stand for what we believe is exactly what you don’t want done to you. We have a right to speak what we believe, same as you have a right to speak what you believe.”

Robert Lindsay #fundie robertlindsay.wordpress.com

Female Rule or Male Rule simply whether society decides to set its norms and laws based on male views or female views.

For example, in modern Western society, we now have cases of Female Rule. This means that female norms, rules and laws have supplanted male rules, laws and norms.

Female Rule: Western Society Amidst the Ruins
Various insane things have resulted since Female Rule has begun in the West:

1. A man goes to jail if he ever hits any female for any reason, apparently even if she is threatening his life. A woman may strike a man as many times as she wishes, but if a man hits back even one time, he is going to jail. In other words, if a woman hits a man, he has no right to hit her back. If she hits him 100 times, he has no right to hit her back. If he hits her back, he’s going to jail.

2. Sexual harassment. Female geniuses have now succeeded in making it so that if a man flirts with a woman, looks at a woman or asks a woman out at work, this is “sexual harassment,” and the man will be fired from his job. Apparently the goal here is to eliminate men flirting with women, men looking at women and men asking out women from the workplace.

3. Alimony. If a woman divorces a man after 5 years of marriage, she still gets 50% of his income for the rest of her life. Why should she have that right. This is insanity.

4. Rape. On California college campuses, males accused of rape incredibly are regarded as guilty until proven innocent. Men must somehow prove that they did not commit the rape. Every sex act must receive approval before it is done. If you touch her tits, you have to ask her permission first. If you kiss her, you have to ask her, “Can I kiss you?” and she has to say, “Yes.” If you have sex with a woman and she never utters one single word of protest to your advances, then this still may be rape as “silence is no longer consent.” So you can still be charged with rape even a woman never said no because you could not read her mind and figure out that she was thinking she didn’t want to do it.

In the UK, all males charged with rape are now guilty until proven innocent. Silence is not considered to be consent, a man can still commit rape even if a woman never said no because he wasn’t able to read her mind and figure out she didn’t want to do it.

Sweden now has the 3rd highest rape rate on Earth not because there are many rapes in Sweden. Actually there are few rapes in Sweden and the true rape rate is low as it has always been. However, Sweden has now been taken over by feminist lunatics who have installed the craziest rape laws the world has ever seen. Hence many sex acts and behaviors which were once legal are now considered to be “rape.” Tell a woman you are going to use a condom and then have with her without one? In Sweden that is called “rape.” Many other behaviors that are neither rape nor even illegal in 99% of the world are considered “rape” in Sweden.

5. Pedophile Mass Hysteria, a moral panic, has been directly caused by Female Rule. Because of this irrational moral panic, solid majorities of Americans now believe many an insane thing. Apparently most Americans believe these things are true:

A man who is aroused by teenage girls is a “pedophile” who belongs in prison.
A man who has sexual fantasies about teenage girls is a “pedophile” who belongs in prison.
A man who says he thinks about or feels like he wants to have sex with teenage girls is a “pedophile” who belongs in prison.
Sexually speaking, a 13-17 year old girl is the same thing as a 7-11 year old girl, a “child.”
Being aroused by a 13-17 year old girl is the same thing as being aroused by a 7-11 year old girl.
Teenage girls are “children” who are somehow “incapable of making decisions” about just about anything, especially sex.
Teenagers shooting nude photos of themselves and passing them around is called “production of child pornography.” The teenagers doing this are “child porn producers.”
Consensual sex between minors is “pedophilia” and if minors are caught have such sex with each other, they need to be arrested, charged and convicted of “child molestation” and afterwards they need to go on the Sex Offender Registry for the rest of their lives.
It is apparently illegal now for adult males to befriend minors of either sex. A man who does this is doing something called “grooming.”
A man who speaks to a female minor is guilty of something called “harassing a child” because the only reason a man would talk to a female minor is if he is scheming to have sex with her.
In every case above, we previously had laws, norms and values based on Male Rule, which is the rule of Logic over Emotion. Now in all of the above cases, Male Rule or the Rule of Reason has been overthrown by women. In its place has been substituted various new laws, rules and mores based on Female Rule which is the rule of Emotion over Logic. In each case, flawed but rational and fair male rules, laws and mores were replaced by faulty, ridiculous and insane female rules. Society is not better as a result. Society is simply crazier and less rational.

This sort of mass chaos and idiocy is probably the typical and possibly even universal result of allowing Female Rule to supplant Male Rule in human society.

laishlife #fundie laishlife.tumblr.com

[ So you really believe that rape victims should have their rapist's baby, even if it's horrible for them, and just shut their mouths and deal with the baby looking like him. Also, it's not 'caring about human life' to say that people HAVE to work in order to be entitled to basic things like food. Do you honestly see disabled people as worthless because they can't work or 'earn' those basic things? Bc that lack of empathy is making me want to make even more of an effort to be kind and help ppl. ]

I love how pro-abortionists always forget what the word “adoption” is.

[ we wouldn’t need adoption if people were able to decide not to get the child they wouldn’t be able to or wouldn’t want to take care of.
And I think that would be a lot better.

It’s sad anyways that adoption even exists. human beings which weren’t wanted by their parents…that’s sad. ]

But adoption gives a child a chance to find someone who DOES want them and love them. When we kill them, we don’t even give them a chance at life.

Adoption is a second chance. Abortion is NO chance and it’s telling that poor child that NOBODY wanted them and all they’re good for is to be killed. I’m not adopted, but at least I would have the comfort of knowing that my mother at least thought of me as a human being that deserved to live.

But I know MANY people who are adopted. I spent 3 years of my life living with a house full of kids that were adopted. I know the pain they feel and separation that comes with adoption, but what I also know is that every single one of them were happy to be alive.

So no. KILLING the child just because you don’t want it is NOT a lot better. It’s selfish, inhumane, and just a cop-out for people who don’t want to grow up and take responsibility for themselves or the people that look up to them for help. People that get abortions simply because they don’t WANT the baby are cruel cruel people who only think about themselves and only deserve as much as what their poor unborn child got from them. Nothing.

Even rape victims are responsible for the child inside of them. As unfair as it is, that child did nothing wrong and deserves to be given a chance. If a rape victim decides to abort their baby, then they are NO better than the person that raped them in the first place. They don’t get a free pass just because they were hurt.

If it’s not purely for medical reasons or life-death situations, then it should be murder. It’s legal murder.


[ but how many children don’t get adopted? Or get adopted into an abusive family? (shit like that exists. happy-go-lucky parents while adopting; hugest abusers as soon as the child id ‘home’)

How the fuck are rape victims responsible if they get pregnant from rape? Should I tell my rapist before they rape me i’m one week away from my period, so pregnancy will happen if they rape me? 
“Hey sir, I’m really sorry, but maybe you souldn’t rape me. You know, I’m sorta at the point of my cycle where pregnancy would happen, sooo…maybe don’t?”
Or should I start using the pill even though I don’t have a partner and the hormones would fuck my whole system up just because I might get raped? 

How the fuck is rape and abortion a similar crime. I don’t think making a baby and aborting it are even similar things.

Well, a baby can become a sickness for the mother. Mental sickness. Shit, I have to get that baby, but I’ll never earn enough money for it. This can cause depression. And this can get worse until it’s a clinical depression ‘n stuff. Is abortion then allowed? I mean, it could make the depression better if the baby gets aborted. Safe the mothers life ‘n stuff.

I don’t think a fetus should really coun’t as a human. Okay, from the 12th week on it really looks like a very small baby, but from that point on abortion isn’t allowed anymore.So at that point I understand, that abortion is no possibility anymore. 
But before that I have no problem with abortion. The fetus isn’t even visible with the eye alone. So why make a fuss about killing it. 
Abortion is also no easy decision for the mother. It’s not like “lmao I got preggo on accident, pls kill it~” It’s one hell of a feelings ride, and hormones will fuck her up extra, because mother feelings are developed too. So don’t assume abortion is an easy decision.
]

I’ve explained all this before with anther person already so I’m not going to write it all out again.

Basically you’re implying that just because someone MIGHT have a hard or unfair life they should just die before anything even happens. With that logic, we should all just kill ourselves because we never know what the future holds. It could end up being something *gasp* BAD! So why live life at all then? Shit, if I had know when I was a baby that one day I would be emotionally and mentally abused for 3 years in boarding school I would have just asked my mom to abort me! (No I wouldn’t, because despite the bad things in life, you have to deal with it all. Life isn’t perfect.)

I never said that rape victims are responsible for the RAPE. I’m saying that they are responsible for the life inside of them.

And no, making a baby and killing a baby are not the same thing because making a baby isn’t the bad part. The rape is the bad part! Killing a baby is wrong, it shouldn’t matter how that baby came to exist. Because both include hurting someone. Rape hurts the mother, abortion hurts the child. And yeah, the mom didn’t ask for that baby but I didn’t ask to be autistic. Some things in life just aren’t fair.

Also that “depression” excuse is a terrible one because 1: Adoption, first of all. 2: Having a baby isn’t the only thing that causes depression. You’re saying that if something has a risk of causing you depression then we should just kill it. I have depression right now because of the abuse I went through. Welp, if only I knew to kill my abusers before they made me depressed.

The fact that adoption exists brings your whole “depression” argument down.

It’s real easy to say it’s okay to kill something when you claim it isn’t human. You think slave owners ever saw black people as human back in the day? No, because it was convenient to treat them like they weren’t!
Your argument is, “It doesn’t LOOK human so why not kill it?”
Animals aren’t human either, yet it’s a crime to abuse and kill dogs and other domestic pets. They aren’t considered “people” either, yet we seem to value them more than early human life!

When you close your eyes and don’t look at it and refuse to call it human, makes it really easy to kill it!

Alia_Harkonnen #sexist reddit.com

If a girl fucked you or dated you, nothing would be better. You'd be an inferior normie. Being a normie is a horrible way to exist, being an inferior normie would just mean you'd have to learn to completely ignore reality so that you can have a healthy relationship or else.
You'd go crazy with anxiety and she'd leave you.

You'd get attached to her and it would kill you although you'd know she's just a cunt. But she was a special cunt who fucked you so you'd turn into a cunt worshiping heart broken normie failure.

You would lose the strength that comes with living in the disgusting miserable real world and not coping with it, cause you'd have to cope.
Or maybe you'd pull it together and have to keep on learning to cope to progress further up the normie ladder. Not be jealous, not be insecure, be open minded, ignore who she is and her past, just eat shit and be grateful a cunt is allowing you access, tolerate the retarded obnoxious creature symbolically attached to it.

Convince yourself she loves you.
Live a life of a cuck. Maybe get married to her or someone else cause now you're a normie so with experience come used up 5s. Maybe a 7 with a make up on but that's ok cause she wants you. She doesn't exactly show it but that's just your insecurity talking.

Then you hit the jackpot. You're married and for 30 minute cunt access every two weeks you have to deal with the cunt tumor for hours and hours each day.
You have to date her, keep things spontaneous, give her quality time, listen to her, respect her passions and interest, compromise, have ambition in life, cause every single thing you do now concerns the cunt attachment.

If now you spend most of your time on this sub what the fuck do you think you'll be doing when you no longer even can do that and drink all day? You think your life will be better when youre not a neet or when you have to eat and drink compatibly with her? Sit with her at the table for dinner. Every single day. Consider her shit every day.

You think a job and a family is an improvement? You'll have to make "friends" too perhaps. Visit them and chat. Pick a hobby. Have passion.
No, life is horrible, miserable and lonely. But if you weren't incel life would still be horrible, miserable, and lonely, you just wouldn't be able to not waste effort on it. That's it, thats all there is to it.

You're rotting while time is passing one way or another. If you ever saw it for what it is then you'd know that anything you do with it is a cope.
I'd still maybe prefer the ability to fuck but only cause IIke the idea of contributing to female traumatic experiences. I'm sick of sentimentality.

FagnarHairyBalls #sexist reddit.com

[Comments under "Merry Christmas to everyone who isn't a single mom"]

@blueeyes239

@FagnarHairyBalls
@blueeyes239
@FagnarHairyBalls
@blueeyes239
@FagnarHairyBalls
@blueeyes239
Hey, guess what? It's me again. And I've got something to say to you. Not every single mother was a prostitute. Some were rape victims. Though by your fucked up logic, that's basically consenting anyway. I don't care if you downvote me. It won't change the fact that you're an immoral sociopath.

Rape victims are sluts.

Tell me, why do you think that?

Because it’s true.

So, if you were raped, you'd be a slut? And before you argue, yes, men can be raped.

No we can't. lol

Wrong. You just say you can't because your deluded mind has made you THINK you're superior to all others, when in reality, you are just a piece of trash. And I take out the trash.

Posted by FagnarHairyBalls:

I'm the rapist, not the victim. Any man who gets raped is a beta subhuman.

RetroSpriteResources #sexist superilovecartoons.deviantart.com

(argument in the comments section under a RAPE SURVIVOR'S stamp; even if he's a troll, the line has been crossed...)


95% of women masturbate everyday to the idea of being raped.

[[citation needed]]

Rape fantasies in women are tied to wanting to feel dominated and controlled by a superior strength to their own. 95% of women prefer men who are taller than them.

[[I don't see how a guy being taller than me equates to him being a misogynistic control freak. Physical traits do not automatically correlate with behavioral traits...[also],You can't just as spout out statistics without proving you didn't make them up.]]

It's true though. Just ask your female friends.

[[I'm 100% female, physically and mentally. And guess what? I HATE the idea of rape (I'd prefer a romantic partner who makes me feel physically and emotionally safe, NOT dominated and scared)... and so do all my female friends. I bet your misogynistic macho-man mind is completely blown, because according to your narrow views of the female human organism, neither I or all my female friends should exist.]]

[you] don't actually care about how well the man can defend [you], that's just a bullshit excuse women came up with when asked why they only date taller men because [you are] embarrassed to admit [your] rape fantasies. A man could be weak as fuck, but a woman would still want him if he was at least stronger than her and able to fulfill her rape fantasies.

[[Where did you get that fact from? An Alt-right blog?]]

No, everyone knows it.

[[The he-man woman hater's club you belong to does not count as "everyone".]]

It's hard to like a gender that masturbates while playing rape scenes through their heads.

Xaelai #sexist mmo-champion.com

Woman wears clothing that invites men to look at her in a sexual way.
Woman struts her stuff to show off her body in an area that's not so safe.
Woman gets raped.

Sure, the guy is definitely at fault, but sometimes it takes two to make something happen. Maybe if women would dress a bit more conservatively, maybe if women wouldn't be showing off their body so much, maybe if women would watch what they're doing at parties and such, we'd see a lot less rapes.

Do you walk down the streets of the ghettos at night wearing an armani suit, and carrying a briefcase full of cash? Of course not. That'd be inviting a mugger to rob you blind. Do you park a Lamborghini and leave the doors unlocked and the keys in the ignition in some dark parking lot at night? I would hope not.

So why on Earth would you want to wear skimpy clothing that invites men to lust over your body and then strut your stuff at some party where someone can drug you or grab you and make off with you and take what they want?

Doesn't matter if it is a robbery, rape, murder, there's the person who commits the crime... and then there's the person who the crime is committed against.

If the latter invites the former by being an easy target, or an attractive target, then the latter is partially contributing to the crime. Everybody has a responsibility to act maturely and in such a way that they are protecting themselves from such crime. Sometimes crime happens anyways even if you do take all the precautionary measures, but if you do something absolutely stupid and you become the victim of a crime... then yes, you're partially to blame for it.

"A woman shouldn't have to change her clothing because of lustful men!"

Ok, are you also saying that a rich man shouldn't have to change out of his armani suit before walking down the streets in a ghetto at night? lol.

Everybody is responsible for their own personal safety. This includes women and skimpy clothing. There's no reason to wear skimpy clothing other than to get men to lust after them. Is it really THAT big of a surprise when a woman who was wearing that trashy clothing gets raped? Now, obviously, if a woman was not wearing trashy clothing and still got raped... then no, she's not at fault (unless she did something else stupid, like drinking at a party or something) at all.

You can't just disregard personal safety and expect the rest of the world to conform to you. No, you must conform to it. If personal safety means not going down the ghetto streets at night wearing rich clothing and carrying money, then yes... that means you either have to not carry the money, not wear such rich-looking clothing, or take the long way to avoid the ghetto street. If you're a woman wanting to avoid being raped, then yes... you should not be wearing skimpy clothing and perhaps you should be avoiding parties and drinking. Perhaps if the woman in question weren't wearing trashy clothing, men might have a little more respect for her, eh?

Lookismisreal #sexist incel.life

As an Incel, whenever you talk about how being an Incel is the worst suffering known to man you are quickly shut down by normantards as they would try to lecture you on how Inceldom is nothing compared to the different kinds of suffering that other people go through, especially femoids who have been raped. To which, I heavily disagree with. Inceldom cannot be compared with rape because rape is nothing compared to being Incel in the slightest.

When it comes to rape, femoids bring it on themselves. If these creatures could act as respectable beings without being total degenerates, things like rape would not occur towards them. Unfortunately, the femoid nature doesn't allow femoids to act as respectable beings. Therefore, these cunts would deliberately put themselves in bad situations only to get what they deserve. But little do they know that, if they didn't act like a total sluts, dress extremely provocatively, or get drunk beyond measure they would never befall such a predicament. Which is why, rape cannot be compared with Inceldom. Incels don't bring Inceldom on themselves, nor do we have certain things we could avoid so we don't turnout as Incels. Why? Because how we look is predetermined and completely out of our control.

Unlike Incels, the femoids who have been raped have the luxury getting unlimited amount of validation, sympathy and attention due to the fact that they simply cry and moan about their experience whatever the chance they get. Also, cum dumpsters have specialized rape crisis centers made towards them to help them overcome their "unfortunate" rape experience thanks to the taxpayers money. But what do we Incels have? Nothing. There are no specialized centers for Incels to overcome their various situations, nor do people sympathize us or give us validation whenever we talk about our painful suffering; we are just hated and mocked endlessly.

The fact of the matter is that, even after being raped, femoid rape victims are still found immensely attractive, they still get into relationships, and they still live normal lives. But when it comes to Inceldom, there is no escape. You will always be sexually unattractive to the opposite gender, you will always be rejected and hated by society and you will never be able to experience what it is to have a normal life. Unending agony is the only thing we will experience until the day we die; all because we happen to be born as ugly males. There is literally no greater suffering than being Incel.

Elder Lansing #fundie twitter.com

Dumbocrats don't know who they want to run against POTUS Trump in 2020. Do they go with bitter hateful racists like Michelle Obama and Oprah Winfrey? Do they go with the touchy feely Serial Molester Joe Biden???Either way you're still getting ran over by the Trump Train# MAGA

Magali Marc #conspiracy dreuz.info

According to the Times, there are only two kinds of people that doubt Mueller's credibility: the madmen or the traitors.

This is why we, the detractors, are accused of engaging in a conspiracy that strengthens adversaries like Russia and creates a "constitutional crisis". The cause of this aggression is self-evident - The Times is convinced that its mission is to destroy president Trump and, concerning Hillary Clinton, still can't accept that Trump was elected legitimately.

Consider the fact that a dozen of columnists in the editorial pages of the journal are Never-Trumpers. Either it's a remarkable coïncidence, or it's a decisive test that everyone has to pass the moment of hiring.

But the journal, because of a bad habit they had during the presidency of Obama, isn't happy enough when it's just defending its positions. They behave themselves like a tool of propaganda for the party, adopting a coercive approach towards those that have differing viewpoints. Objections that we have are demonized and considered to be heretic.

Original French:

Selon le Times, il n’y a que deux sortes de personne qui peuvent mettre en doute la crédibilité de Mueller: les fous ou les traîtres:

Ainsi nous, les détracteurs, sommes accusés de nous engager dans une conspiration qui enhardira des adversaires comme la Russie et produira une «crise constitutionnelle».
La cause de cette agressivité est évidente – le Times demeure convaincu que sa mission consiste à détruire le président Trump, et, à l’instar d’Hillary Clinton, ne peut toujours pas accepter l’élection de Trump comme légitime.

Prenez en considération le fait que la douzaine de chroniqueurs des pages éditoriales du journal sont tous des Never-Trumpers. Soit, il s’agit d’une remarquable coïncidence, soit cela vient d’un test décisif qu’on doit passer au moment de l’embauche.

Mais le journal, à cause d’une mauvaise habitude contractée pendant la présidence de Barack Obama, ne se contente pas de défendre ses positions. Il se comporte comme un outil de propagande de parti, adoptant une approche coercitive envers ceux qui ont des points de vue différents. Les objections qu’on leur fait sont diabolisées et considérées comme hérétiques.

holocaust21 #fundie holocaust21.wordpress.com

9 Reasons Why Child Porn Laws Are Evil

When I started writing this article I couldn’t believe how many reasons I could come up with as to why child pornography laws are totally wrong. So without further ado, it’s time to abolish this offence from our legal statutes; and here’s no less than 9 reasons why:-

1. Child abuse images are completely legal, while child porn images are not

Imagine, hypothetically, you came across a video on the internet that featured a seedy man in a dark room with a big, sharp hammer. The man had a look of pure evil in his eyes and in a corner of the room hudled a young girl. The man slowly took a step towards her, ‘I’m going to hit you’ he said softly. The girl had a look of terror on her face. He shook his hammer in the air and she reflexively put her hands around her head. ‘I’m going to kill you’ he said louder taking another step. He lifted his hammer high up in the air. Suddenly the child made a desperate bid to run away but he grabbed her and struck a blow to her skull. Her skull could be seen to be smashed and blood poured out. The camera showed him hitting her again and again and again until there was nothing left other than a lifeless decapitated mess on the floor. Then the video ended.

Would you have not thought that such a horrific video would be illegal and probably classed as level 5 child porn (the most severe)?

Think again.

In reality extreme child abuse images like those depicted above are completely legal. Why? Because it is not sexual. It is horrific violence. In our society violence and abuse are celebrated while sex, love and affection are criminalised.

A man possessing bath photos of 5 year old girls would receive years, even decades, in prison. A man possessing the hypothetical video above would not receive even a single day behind bars.

And this is the legal situation that our hateful and vindictive politicians support.

As Orwell might have said: Our politicians have redefined Child Abuse to be Child Love and Child Love to be Child Abuse.

2. Child porn is not child abuse

Not only are the most horrific child abuse images completely legal and not considered to be child porn, but most of what counts as child pornography does not even depict child abuse.

Let us examine the definitions of child pornography under the COPINE scale (or SAP scale as it is more accurately referred to), this is the scale typically used by the police when measuring the ‘severity’ of a child porn image. It goes from level 1 (least severe) to level 5 (most severe).

By examining the definitions of child porn on the COPINE scale we find that child pornography images levels 1 – 4 are categorically NOT abuse images. This is because level 1 covers bath photos and levels 2 – 4 cover sexual activity only, no mention of violence is made. As we know from the RIND meta study, which analysed some 59 other studies it found that sexual activity with children does not usually cause harm, contrary to contemporary feminist dogma.

Any image in which pain is implied is automatically elevated to level 5 on the COPINE scale. This does not, however, imply that level 5 images always involve pain. This is because any image with an animal involved in any way at all would also count as level 5. Nor does it imply that any image involving pain is level 5 – as discussed above an image of a child being brutally murdered would not be considered child pornography at all despite that being the most horrific thing that can happen to a person.

3. Child porn is a thought crime

Child porn is a thought crime. It involves no actions. Merely being a curious individual and seeking possession of a single image can result in decades behind bars. This is the same way that possession of a blank book would have resulted in 20 years behind bars in the novel 1984. The creation of thought crime legislation is the primary indicator of a full blown totalitarian state.

No harm is ever committed in having thoughts, even bad or dangerous ones. If people cannot express and discuss their thoughts then they will in many cases suffer in silence and in other cases explode in outbursts of extreme violence such as, for example, virgin killers like Elliot Rodger.

4. Criminalising any image is an affront to democracy

Freedom of speech and freedom of expression are essential components of a democracy.

Child pornography laws undermine freedom of expression. Possessing and distributing child porn is free expression.

The consequences of undermining freedom of expression cannot be understated. A country without freedom of expression cannot be a democracy. Without an informed and educated electorate the voters are merely sheep voting based only on what they are allowed to know. However, if they were provided with the full facts then they would have come to wildly different voting decisions.

In essence the society we live in today is a pseudo-democracy. A society where an uninformed and ignorant electorate vote. This leads to tyranny. Already we can see this with the massive escalation of child porn and child sex sentences worldwide and its associated age of consent dogma. The belief that sexual activity with anyone below the age of consent is always horrific abuse is caused in part by the criminalisation of child pornography i.e. the removal of evidence that breaking age of consent laws does not cause harm in and of itself.

It is modern day book burning.

As older folk who lived in more tolerant times die out the society becomes increasingly ignorant to the point that reality becomes entirely warped, as is happening with the Savile affair in Britain, including absurd claims that he engaged in necrophilia.

The road to tyranny is then well and truly laid.

5. Banning one thing leads to the ‘slippery slope’ effect of banning everything

As soon as one thing is banned it then becomes acceptable to start banning more things until even you are classed as a serious organised criminal, sex offender or terrorist (if you aren’t already).

This is already happening with the expanding definition of child pornography. For example, in the UK it was initially limited to children under 16. Then it got expanded to ‘children’ under 18, despite the age of consent still being 16. Laws were then introduced to criminalise not only ‘real’ images but also cartoon drawings. So-called ‘extreme pornography’ which included adults engaging in bestiality or BDSM also became criminalised. And now, images of women pretending to be raped is in the process of being criminalised.

This of course ignores the onslaught of anti-terrorist legislation, which makes glorifying terrorism illegal and has some extreme double standards. The terrorist murder of Osama Bin Laden for instance, glorified by the mainstream media, was not seen as criminal whilst calling for genocidal politicians from the American or British regimes to be hung, drawn and quartered would be. And let us not even get into the minefield of ‘hate speech’ legislation – such as ‘anti-racist’ speech…

The bottom line is that banning has become endemic to our political class. They will only ever be satisfied once everything is criminalised and the entire population live in cages.

6. Child porn laws undermine the rule of law

The rule of law is essential to a peaceful society where random violence is minimised. The state must not be able to arbitrarily arrest people just because they can. There must be the appropriate checks and balances.

Child pornography laws allow the arbitrary arrest of just about anyone. Anyone who has ever used the internet can easily be raided by the police on suspicion of possessing or distributing child pornography. All that is needed for a conviction is for the police to find one single thumbnail image. Such an image can often be placed in a defendant’s possession without their knowledge as a consequence of computer viruses, accidental website hits as well as vengeful colleagues, friends and wives who deliberately frame an individual. Even if the defendent accidentally came across the image and deleted it immediately the police can still find it, charge and convict the man for a thought crime offence.

This process can also lead to ‘selective enforcement’ in other words those who stand up against the prevailing ideology or police state would be automatically raided by the police and likely found to be in possession of child porn. On the otherhand, high ranking paedofinder general politicians would never be raided even though they probably possess more child porn than anyone else (they need to behave like paedofinder generals to reduce their risk of arrest, afterall).

7. Child porn laws are so excessively broad that they effectively rape children of their childhood

Child pornography laws are now so broad that even non-nude images can count as child porn. The paedohysterical atmosphere has resulted in a climate so extreme that schools frequently ban parents from photographing their own children. This means that youth growing up today will not have any photos of their childhood. Their childhood is essentially stolen from them by the police state. And worst of all, children are prevented from learning about life (like playing on the streets, as kids used to do) and from forming normal relationships with adults (especially men).

In essence, child pornography laws and our paedohysterical atmosphere effectively rape children of their childhood by stealing from them what past generations took for granted.

8. Banning child porn allows child rapists and child abusers to walk free

It is a well known fact that police officers are lazy. They like to go for the easiest to lynch people. There is no one easier to lynch than sexting teenagers. Often unaware that what they are doing is even illegal they become an easy catch for the paedophile unit. The propagation of child pornography and age of consent laws means that making arrests is like shooting fish in a barrel. And amongst the fish, big bad fish can hide and not be shot because they are not the targets.

Criminalising low-level, harmless consensual sexual behaviour results in kind and harmless individuals being piled up in prison whilst real violent thugs and rapists are free to abuse and rape again.

9. Those who seek to ban child pornography are all paedophiles themselves anyway

Much like many in the Nazi party were homosexuals many of our legislators, especially anti child pornography legislators, are infact paedophiles themselves. Take the arrest of Cameron’s close aide Patrick Rock on suspected child pornography charges as an example of this.

One arrest you say? Just a bad apple? How about the revelations that some senior cabinet ministers in Tony Blair’s former government were believed to be fapping off to child porn? Not only that, but the government issued D-Notices to the mainstream media to stop them reporting on the story. And they all obeyed.

What does this, in essence, mean? It means that what is commonly called ‘paedophilia’ is really normal male sexuality. It means that our politicians are all a bunch of hypocrites who criminalise normal male sexuality in order to endlessly increase their power. And then they break their own laws. They are opportunistic bastards.

Already more and more people are starting to talk about ‘paedophiles in high places’. I can only but guess that some of this is because the population are getting sick of paedophile hysteria yet they are too scared or too stupid to point out that the laws themselves are the problem.

Anonymous #fundie #conspiracy #racist #crackpot #magick #wingnut 8kun.top

My grandfather was a volunteer with Arājs Kommando. In 1982 shortly before his death I visited my relatives in Jelgava and asked him about the war. I was just a child, but what he told me I'll never forget.

His unit were police battling armed criminal gangs and communist terrorists. One of the gangs was a pedophile gang kidnapping children. They had no idea what they were getting into.

They staked out the the gang's hiding place and saw people going in for what appeared to be a religious ceremony. They were supposed to just watch and identify the people involved, but when they heard the screaming of a child being raped or tortured they one of the men couldn't control himself and went in, they had to arrest everyone there.

It had been a Satanic ritual. The child was raped and exsanguinated in a sacrifice. Everyone they arrested was a communist Jew. A treasure trove of documents were recovered, most were membership lists and plans for terrorist attacks, but some were talking about exterminating the Amaleks. The main plan seemed to be to take control with a communist dictatorship and execute all of the Amalek for minor crimes. If that failed they'd be propagandized into being hated by everyone in the world. There was even a plan to exterminated them by through immigration of African males and breeding them out of existence.

Most of the Satanists did not talk they were simply content to being executed for their monstrous crimes. One was willing to talk, because "no one will believe you" he admitted the Amalek are "The Isrealites, the Europeans, You!" They raped the child is because "Moloch demands it" real satanists mutilate children's genitals. It separates the serious from the fakers, there is no higher evil than defiling a child. "Only once you've proven yourself can Lucifer grant you his power to control the minds of the goyim."

As he put down these monsters at Rumbula, they did not beg for mercy. They offered prayers to Moloch and claimed to have "already won." He said it felt as if God himself was pulling the trigger. That the world was just that much brighter and more hopeful when they were done. They left out most of this from the reports, everyone was just a communist or communist supporter.

I thought him a crazy old man of course. My relatives said he was never quite right after the war. I mostly forgot about him. Moloch? Amalek? I'd never heard of any of this nonsense before.

Then when Pedestas emails were leaked and pizzagate happened I fucking shit myself. It all made sense. It's all real. The nazis were literally fighting against the devil and the devil won. We're living in hell.

Beverly Owens #fundie wnd.com

Trump apologizes for "pussy grabbing" video]

Men being men saying vulgar things in private. And this is news? I am Christian and do not like this kind of gutter talk, but how does this stand in comparison to the corruption and scandal of the Clintons? Liberals openly push perversion and immorality with LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ, threaten our security by allowing untold millions to invade our country, and seek every opportunity to strip us of our God-given, Constitutionally defined rights of freedom of speech, religion, and self defense. In the scheme of things, Trump is still preferable to Clinton any day when it comes to leading this country. The only one who can save any individual or country is Jesus.

We know this was released at this time so Hillary can try to make this the focus of the debate. I think Trump should have a list of every Clinton scandal and start reading it every time she tries to bring this up.

bernard goldberg #fundie bernardgoldberg.com

(Continuing)

Still, I’d prefer that instead of continuing to wage religious war over this, we call a truce.

What if we had a law said that bakers have no obligation to actually deliver the cake to the site of the wedding; that a florist does not have to attend the wedding to make sure the flowers are arranged properly; that a photographer does not have to take pictures at the actual wedding ceremony? What if the law said, in essence, that business owners, if their religion forbids it, don’t have to set foot inside a venue where a gay wedding takes place.

But, under this compromise, the same law would say that the baker does have to simply bake the cake for the gay couple, and the florist does simply have to sell them flowers, and the photographer does simply have to take pictures at his studio – because businesses that are open to the general public must serve the general public or pay a fine.

There was a comment posted on Snopes.com by someone called “Solandri” that asked for give on both sides. “This [Oregon] case should never have gotten this far. It should have been resolved privately with the company baking the cake but not decorating it, and the lesbian couple decorating it themselves or hiring someone else to decorate it. Coexistence only works if all parties try to figure out a way to coexist with minimal disruption to each other, instead of immediately trying to inflict the maximum possible harm upon each other just because they disagree.”

I understand that some people of faith don’t want any part of gay weddings – even if that part is a small one, such as only baking the cake (and not being required to so much as show up in the same zip code as the wedding). But I worry about the slippery slope.

If bakers can refuse to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple because doing so would violate their religious beliefs, why can’t they refuse to serve openly gay people – period?

Why can’t the florist refuse to sell flowers to gay people – who simply want flowers?

Why can’t these business owners of faith say that homosexuality, in their view, is a sin and they can’t do business with sinful people?

In the ruling against the Christian bakers, Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian said that, “This case is not about a wedding cake or a marriage. It is about a business’s refusal to serve someone because of their sexual orientation. Under Oregon law, that is illegal.”

He’s right.

Still, I don’t want to see those Christian bakers in Portland lose their business over this. But let’s not forget that they did make a decision to operate in a civil society. They did open their shop on Main Street. It’s one thing to say on Facebook, “We are here to obey God not man, and we will not conform to this world,” but if you really believe that, don’t open a bakery on a city street. Open it in your church.

Permit me a brief detour: In San Francisco the liberal establishment welcomes all immigrants, legal or otherwise. The mayor and city council have declared San Francisco a “Sanctuary City” and like the 300 or so other sanctuary cities in the United States, they don’t always co-operate with federal immigration officers on matters involving illegal aliens. In the wake of the tragic murder of that young woman in San Francisco, by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times and had many felony convictions, the city’s policy has left many decent people furious — though liberals, in general, still like the idea of sanctuary cities.

But should the city of San Francisco be the judge and jury on what laws it will embrace and which ones it won’t.

And should the Christian bakers in Portland, Oregon be the arbiter of what laws they will follow and which one’s they won’t.

The sanctimony of true believers is understandable. But at times it is also exhausting.

sergeantdave #fundie freerepublic.com

These black-robe fascists don’t run the military; the president does.

I’d prefer that Trump arrest this judge for treason and make him stand before a military tribunal on those charges. Barring that, ignore that judge.

(I can’t wait for FR’s hand-wringers and weenies to show up and tell us that ignoring an out-of-control judge would upset the propaganda media, and we can’t do that.)

Brenda Sinclair #conspiracy patriotnewsdaily.com

yes an abomination in the eyes of God in heaven two gays in whitehouse and a trannie gay called michelle who dressed up to be a woman first lady with a penis, how dis respectful to americans what a dis honor they were allowed to sleep and stench up the whitehouse with their parties of little boys to rape, yes obama child trafficked out of white house wikileaks proved it, in time he will be arrested

image

ashleyunplugged #fundie stfumras.tumblr.com

[Please note that STFU MRAs is NOT the source for this quote. The OP deleted, so reblogs and (negative) responses like the ones from this link are the only thing left.]

If you are a feminist, and you eat meat and dairy products - you should know that you STILL support rape, abuse, child abuse, female oppression, and men who flex their muscles and their dominance over others.

Crusader70 #sexist reddit.com

Molyneux makes a great point in that video that rights are just fiction. Women have no real protection from rape in terms of "rights". They get this protection in actions, and the best protection against rape is a patriarchal society in which women are things men protect and provide for. Cops don't really care about rape much and I'd be the first who'd want my daughter raped if she were a slut.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

The establishment clique is still in shock over Trump winning

They're furious, desperate and completely baffled. They haven't gotten over it. They can't understand how the power slipped out of their hands. They're boiling over with feelings of anger and desire for vengeance. They see Trump as a pretender who stole the power that was rightfully theirs forever. They had the votes locked and political positions secured for eternity, or that's what they thought. They believed they had the perfect, two-party machine with repeating dem and rep strokes grinding out power and wealth for them forever.

Then came Trump who broke the two-party machine and wrested the control out of their hands. Now they're in shock. All their dirty secrets like the Bohemian grove, kiddie sex slave rings, and trillions of stolen dollars are known to Trump and they don't know how he's going to use that information. I'm sure they've used all means at their disposal to convince Trump not to do anything. Bribes, threats and backstabbing media attacks. Nothing's working. The Trump Train is still going strong.

However, Trump needs people to watch his six. To uncover and battle fake news, stop all attempts to bury important information like pizzagate, and stay strong. The clique is coming after us, too. They are posting here all the time about how "Trump's lost it", "Trump's desperate", "Trump's looking weak" and so on. Don't believe any of it! It's an illusion, not reality. USA has NEVER had as strong and righteous president as we have now!

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate's headline: "HollyWeird's New NAMBLA Inspired Movie Promotes Sexual Immorality & Child Rape"

Just when you thought the world was full of sin and couldn't get any worse, it proves that sin is never satisfied (just as the Holy Bible states).
There's a new movie out, "Call Me By Your Name," about an American professor who falls for his male student.

Actor James Woods spoke out about it stating:

"As they quietly chip away the last barriers of decency. #NAMBLA".

His comment was immediately met with the equivalency of, "Your sin is no better than my sin" from NAMBLA sympathizers...a convenient dodge considering that women and men were created to compliment each other and is not a sin but what that movie is promoting is not only an abomination, but an attempt for child rapists to segue into raping even younger children. The young man in the movie is 19, an adult teenager, but expect the wicked to try to keep going younger and younger as sin is never satisfied AND their goal is to legalize child rape.

One decent commenter responded with, ""When people have no God this is what happens." Of course the alt-left took that as nothing more than "hate", their regular habit of calling good evil and evil good.

NAMBLA stands for The North American Man/Boy Love Association, which reportedly fights to allow adult men to have male minor lovers. Men raping boys is a DISGUSTING ACT and ABOMINATION deserving of the death penalty!

image

DISCLAIMER: I'm not very familiar with James Wood's past, but apparently it's sketchy. I pray for him and the other lost souls that are searching for something and only abusing themselves in the process.
http://www.foxnews.com/ente...

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

BoondockT #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

***Gut Feeling***About the This Healthcare Bill among other things.*We might see a surprise. SURPRISE PULLED RINO Defeat

In my last *Gut Feeling* thread it had a heavy concentration on Obama spying etc. This one does as we but also is going to dive in some other topics that are coming to a head. This is very dangerous times we are living in.

These things over the last month seem to be panning out at an accelerated pace.


This healthcare bill has taken absolute precedence in the leftist media. Absolute. If

if you check CNN out right now you will see this story whiteout the front page of the news. Any time that you see a story take complete control over a news agency you need to start raising mental red flags. And whenever a huge story does not appear on a media outlet you also need to raise red flags. It's all about balance.

Over the course of the week we have had two large stories that appeared and then disappeared from CNN. And this month we had one MASSIVE story that didn't even make it to CNN. And another story which never made it to the media either.


The London Terror Attack

The Obama Spying Smoking Gun
Wikileaks Vault #7

Judge Blocking the Revised Travel ban (Obama Connection in Hawaii)

But we have seen one story that has dominated CNN headlines

Healthcare


Each story that has not Dominated the media has in some way shown that Trump has been right.


London Attacks- Radicalization in Islam is very real. If you continue to let folks come in your country that do not like your country two things are bound to happen. They themselves will carry out an attack, or they will radicalize the country's own people to carry out attacks.

Trump has been talking about this since he ran for office. The leftist media has fought him tooth and nail. But Trump once again had another “I told you so moment” the leftist media can not have that happen.

2. The Obama Smoking Gun

I have yet to see that term be used one time in the leftist media. Why? That makes their coverage as well as their presidential idol look bad. We have been saying that indeed Trump would not make those claims while sitting in the Oval office without viewing evidence. The media on the left over the last month has been working tirelessly to discredit Trump. using terms like: No Proof, Baseless, Imaginary, No Evidence. These are key words. These words are very powerful and plant seeds in the minds of people. All those words in the media really mean “Discredit”. If they can embed those words in their clocks minds, the mission is already achieved. It's a form of mind control folks. Now there seems to be information coming out that may indeed backfire on the Leftist Media, so what do they do? DON’T TALK ABOUT IT, THE SEEDS ARE ALREADY PLANTED. But talking about healthcare keeps it in the picture. Keep reading on. The smoking gun is going to be discussed in a closed session. This worries me.

3. Wikileaks Vault #7


This baffled me actually. There was absolutely no coverage on CNN or MSNBC about vault #7. It literally made me sick. But the reason as to why made sense. tried to make Trump look like a loony by saying he was being spied on, and leaks came out that showed Indeed it is very plausible that he was and is being spied on. So what did they do? DONT TALK ABOUT IT. And it worked. Majority of America still does not know about Vault #7 one of the most damning leaks in history.


4. Travel Ban 2.0 being blocked by Hawaii Judge day of Obama visiting Hawaii.


Guys I don't even have to dig into this to make it look shady. That reaks of corruption. Yet, the leftist media showed it for a few, then **poof** disappeared once stories started coming out that Obama visited Hawaii that same day.

Mind control.


But CNN has covered this healthcare bill like the plague. Why? Because they have a win win narrative. But they are not seeing the Trump Card. Just keep reading on.

Trump told the American people that he would repeal and replace Obamacare. I will be the first to say that this healthcare bill spearheaded by Ryan is not the best that we could do. But it is better than Obamacare.

But CNN knows that, if it does not pass they can make it look like a huge Victory for the Democrats, and if it passes they can make it look like a huge defeat for the American people.

A WIN-WIN situation. If it does pass, Expect Huge protests that will dominate the leftist media. If it does not pass. Expect that story to dominate the leftist media.

Effectively Blacking out “The smoking Gun” on any leftist outlet, keeping their herds asleep and drinking the Kool-Aid. They still can't see the Trump card though. .

I'm telling you this is Matrix level shit going on right now. If you can't see it, it's because you are still plugged in.


Expect directly after the healthcare vote the smoking gun evidence will begin to come out clearly. This will not be covered by the left.

But….Theres an upside to all of this.


THE TRUMP CARD


There still is a Trump card that is hidden in plain sight.

I said in my previous thread that there is a reason why Trump made these allegations during the time of healthcare negotiations.


What bill is being attempted to be repealed? OBAMAcare. That one word that describes the Affordable Care Act keeps the Former President in the media whether HE LIKES it OR NOT. There is no escaping, when your name is linked to the term. YOUR GOING TO STAY IN THE MEDIA spotlight whether you like it or not. That is your Trump card.

Trump, by focusing on healthcare forces Obama to stay in the media. He can't escape coverage. He can't slither off Into the night. He is trapped in media coverage. This makes it impossible when the smoking gun is released to stay out of the minds of people. Either way, whether it is healthcare or spying, the two are inevitably going to mix, because of the Name.

Once the media catches on to this, expect the Affordable Care Act to be used more often than Obamacare, just watch.

Guys. . .Trump is playing the media and establishment and the media has no fucking clue that he is.


If this healthcare Bill Passes this could be Flag they needed to start Riots. The left with feed the flames with false narratives
If the healthcare Bill does not pass Expect the media to be on a feeding frenzy (But that keeps Obama in the Picture)
Expect the Smoking Gun to be released directly afterwards involving James Comey. Only the Republican Intel Chairman knows about these new findings. This is very dangerous. The media is trying to spin it to look bad on the Republicans. Don't Fucking believe it for one minute
Expect a lot of falling on swords in the next two weeks.


I personally think we might see a surprise in this Healthcare Vote.

Paul Ray Ramsey, Patrick Casey, Scott Greer, Matt Parrott and Brad Griffen #racist rightwingwatch.org

White nationalists, although having grown skeptical of the Trump administration for its support of Israel, still circled their wagons around Trump, defending the remarks against criticisms that they are stoking racial animosity in the United States.

Paul Ray Ramsey, a white nationalist who is known as “Ramzpaul” online, tweeted that the progressive congresswomen were “elected from their fellow tribesmen who were imported into America” and only love the United States for “the wealth that they can loot.” He added that “they dance with glee with the thought of eliminating us.” Patrick Casey, the leader of the white nationalist organization Identity Evropa (which has rebranded under a new name), wrote on Twitter that although he still has reservations about the Trump administration’s current policy trajectory, “Trump escalating his attacks on these four horrid women—women who simply do not belong in America, let alone in our government—is more than a little satisfying.”

Scott Greer, a disgraced Daily Caller editor who was fired after it was revealed he was writing articles in a white nationalist publication under a false name, praised Trump and wrote that the day he tweeted his attack on the congresswomen was “the day he became president.” Greer has longstanding connections to white nationalist circles in and around Washington.

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, a Republican former congressman, compared Trump’s rhetoric toward the congresswomen to that of David Duke, a longtime Klu Klux Klan leader whom Trump declined chances to disavow while on the campaign trail. Duke, who, like some other white supremacists, has slowly soured on Trump, took issue with that comparison, asserting that Trump would never praise white people as explicitly as Duke does.

But not everybody’s happy. White nationalist Matt Parrott ruefully wrote that Trump “doesn’t create white tribalism” with racist tweets, but rather “exploits the white tribalism which has been bubbling up and boiling over long before he even rode down the gilded escalator.” And Brad Griffin, who authors the blog Occidental Dissent under the name “Hunter Wallace,” seems to have had his fill of Trump, writing that Trump wasn’t “stoking white nationalism” in his tweets, since white nationalists “aren’t supporting him anymore.” Wallace alleged that Trump’s comments were really about the progressive women’s “lack of subservience to Israel.”

Matt Forney #fundie gab.ai

Leftists hate and fear Russia because Russians are God-fearing, upright people who don't tolerate poz.

The Devil always fears the righteous.

Even if President Trump had lost, they'd still be agitating for war with Russia because they despise everything good in the world.

mlp-fictionkin #sexist mlp-fictionkin.tumblr.com

The #metoo tag

Should include reverse rape. It’s a serious problem that’s just as bad and just as, if not more, common than what people usually refer to as rape, and it is a form of rape.

Let me educate you all here a second, because unfortunately, reverse rape is often overlooked and ignored.

Reverse rape is when someone refuses to date someone else because of their appearance, weight, race, because they’re trans, or for whatever other biased reason they might have. It’s denying love and affection to someone who they would otherwise choose to date in an instant, but because of transphobia, fatphobia, racism, or other issues of oppression, they engage in reverse rape. It can be VERY harmful and cause lasting emotional trauma and insecurity, much like the typical meaning of the word rape.

Victims of reverse rape are still rape victims. It’s a serious matter and it makes me so depressed to see how it’s always overlooked and victims of reverse rape aren’t taken seriously.

-Mod Dash

#Mod Dash #Mod Dash speaks #text post #reverse rape #feminism #metoo #tw: rape #rape #fatphobia #transphobia #racism #oppression

Jazzy Network #fundie neogaf.com



15-year old girl gang-raped near high school after homecoming dance

I can't find a single shred of fault on the girls part. Lock these kids up or remove their penises.

Other than the fact that she willingly drank alcohol at an illegal age? Don't give me that.

Question, fellas: What would have been your reaction towards her if she were your daughter/sister?

Stupid question. Better question. What if your son was one of those rapists? You gonna send him to jail?

If I had a son who took part in the gang-rape of a young girl, I'd drive him to jail myself.

Sorry, but I believe you like I believe in Santa Claus being real.

You wouldn't turn in your child if they were guilty of rape? Love or not, the law applies to everybody, and if my child is unstable enough to rape somebody, who's to say that they won't hurt me in some way?

Um fuck no. If I had a son I would do anything to keep him out of jail. I don't want him to lose 5 years of his life in some pisshole no matter what he did. Why do you think people's parents go kill people who rape/kill their kids? They would do anything for them

Jean Rafferty #conspiracy thenational.scot

TWENTY-FIVE years ago today, on February 27, 1991, a fleet of cars set off in convoy from Kirkwall on the Orkney mainland. It was barely light as they drove across the Churchill Barriers to the island of South Ronaldsay – they wanted to be sure that the children they were going to collect were still at home. From the outcry they incurred later, you’d have thought they were kidnappers holding families to ransom, not police and social workers trying to protect children from one of the most vicious forms of child abuse humans have yet devised – satanic ritual abuse (SRA).

Many people reading this will snort in derision – hasn’t SRA long been discredited? It’s just daft social workers without the wit to know when kids are being over-imaginative? Isn’t it? A cardinal has fallen, the Catholic Church’s schools and institutions have been revealed as riddled with cruelty and perversion, and family entertainers have been exposed as paedophiles and rapists – and yet we doubt that this form of sexual abuse, which has existed for thousands of years, is still with us.

I first got involved in investigating SRA more than 20 years ago. Before Orkney there was a group of travelling families in Ayrshire whose children started talking about family abuse. One said he and his brothers had been filmed touching adults’ “wuggies and bums”. They were taken into care and there were endless court processes examining the evidence. A few years earlier there was a kind of consensus among social workers that children didn’t lie about stuff like that. And at first no-one doubted the Ayrshire children. Forensic evidence backed up many of the things they said. One described his aunt crawling up his body and extracting two of his back teeth with a pair of big long scissors. A doctor from Glasgow Children’s Dental Hospital confirmed that the outer enamel of his teeth had come out in a neat, clean break that was “highly unusual” and could have been caused by using an instrument.

But five years after the initial charges had been made the parents were granted leave to petition for nobile officium, the ultimate appeal in Scots law. Evidence which had been accepted for five years was suddenly thrown into question. A new sheriff said the child who’d started the whole process off was a devious, manipulative little boy and should be sent back home – despite admitting that “it is possible that this has been a case of child abuse”. By then the tide had turned. After a number of years of sensational convictions, there was suddenly a consensus among the media and the judiciary that there was no such thing as satanism. There were lying children, of course.

Everyone knows the little sods lie all the time. There were also hysterical social workers, who, despite years of professional training, had all been swept up in a craze for madcap American thinking. And there were only innocent parents, poor victims whose children had been snatched from them and who must have their little darlings restored to them immediately. The family as the primary social unit was not to be questioned again – Britain’s newspapers would make sure of that.

The children in Ayrshire were sent home and so were the children who’d been removed from their homes in Orkney. They’d been taken to the mainland and housed with foster families in Highland region and in Strathclyde. There, they said the most bizarre things. One nine-year-old boy directed a play in which the “minister” was shown wearing split trousers revealing his bare backside, which the boy then hit. A seven-year-old girl in a different foster family became uncharacteristically aggressive when she was told she was going home and smashed a doll on the ground. She said she didn’t want to go and stood “like a wooden doll”, refusing to get dressed.

Such strange behaviour proves nothing, of course, though the fact there was so much of it in children from different accused families might surely have given the authorities pause for thought. Instead, Sheriff David Kelbie sent the children home without testing the evidence in court. This decision was criticised by the Law Society of Scotland and by Lord Clyde in his inquiry into the case, but that fact has been ignored for 25 years, to the extent that even as respected a news outlet as the BBC can report that the parents in Orkney were innocent. Innocent till proven guilty? Yes, but innocent beyond the shadow of a doubt? That, the Orkney parents can never claim.

Over the past 25 years I have written a number of articles on SRA and on recovered memory; I have gone back to Orkney to re-investigate; I have chased up members of the W family, the huge family at the heart of the case. Most of the articles have never seen the light of day. The one major piece I managed to get into the mainstream was in The Guardian Weekend magazine under the editorship of Deborah Orr. The house lawyer told her the article had a tendency to suggest the accused parents in Ayrshire were guilty. She chose to publish it in full.

Others were not so brave and it became one of the great frustrations of my writing career that I’d pour months of research into a piece, only to have it buried. One editor, on receiving an interview about a woman tied up in a cage for months, said she just didn’t believe such things happened. I’ve always wondered how she felt when Natascha Kampusch emerged from her years of captivity or when Elizabeth Fritzl talked about being imprisoned and raped by her own father.

EVEN those who deny the existence of international satanist networks can hardly pretend that satanist abuse never happens – in 2002 Manuela and Daniel Ruda were convicted by a German court of killing Frank Haagen, carving a pentagram into his stomach and drinking his blood. In 2011 Colin Batley was convicted of leading a satanist cult in the west Wales town of Kidwelly. Among other things he committed 11 separate rapes, three indecent assaults, six counts of buggery and four counts of possessing indecent images of a child.

Over and over again satanist abuse has been proved to exist, so why does so much energy go into denying it? I have never been able to understand it and in the end decided to have one final shot at putting SRA into the public domain again. I’d been talking to Bob, a survivor who’d been abused by a satanic sex ring as a child. Although he’d made a life for himself with marriage and a good job, his memories had started to take over his life, he’d lost the job and was now struggling to survive. I told him I probably wouldn’t be able to get his story into the papers, but he said it would help to talk about it. It was he who suggested I fictionalise it.

I was dubious at first because this form of abuse is so sensational in its essence that it’s hard to believe. People who’d tackled it before either went for horror, like Dennis Wheatley, or else drew in elements of the supernatural, as in Phil Rickman’s Midwinter Of The Spirit, recently dramatised on television. I find it hard to believe in the spirit world so the latter was not an option. What I settled for was to make the story as real as possible and in doing so, to demystify it. Whether the perpetrators believe in the dark gods is irrelevant to me but what they do to their victims has haunted me for years. They tell children that satan always sees them – he’s the spider in the corner of the room or the staring-eyed cat. They have no freedom in their heads, which seems to me the cruellest abuse of all.

It was natural to set my novel, Dark Web, in Orkney, not just because I knew about the historic case but because the landscape there is so imbued with human history. The Neolithic village of Skara Brae, the chambered tombs all over the islands, the immense standing stones of the Ring of Brodgar all form a dramatic backdrop that makes you question what it is to be human. Although the book is short, it has taken a huge amount of time – writing, shaping, rewriting. Trying to make it credible in literary terms is not the same as telling the truth. The publisher who had an option on the book thought it was very powerful though had some questions about the Orkney setting. Still, when she invited me for dinner at her house I thought we were going to discuss publication dates – she wanted autumn but I wanted to go earlier, at the summer solstice, as the climax of the book is set on that day.

Over wine and salmon she told me the book was on an important subject and was powerful, indeed scorching. But she said her editor had said he’d resign if she published it. Choosing to locate the story on Orkney would cause people to be triggered, even if they’d only peripherally been involved. Some of them might even commit suicide. You wouldn’t set a novel about a spree killer in Dunblane, would you? I don’t think anything is barred to a writer, but she said I was immoral and heartless for even considering it. Given that the book has been driven all along by a concern for the survivors of SRA I found that hard to take, but also deeply puzzling.

People who commit suicide generally do so because they find themselves unable to carry on with life, not because they’ve read something on a subject they already know about. People don’t normally threaten to resign over a book. My first two fictional books were nominated for literary prizes and one had been promoted in WH Smith, so such obdurate resistance was unexpected. As our argument became more robust her whole response seemed to me to be more and more irrational. After years of struggle I shouldn’t have been surprised but I am still baffled. The setting won’t please the people of Orkney, who I’m sure would like to forget that the scandal of 25 years ago ever happened. But then I’m not writing for their tourist board – and the irony is that the book’s early readers have all really liked the evocations of the Orkney landscape. It seems to me that if the novel upsets anyone involved in the case it’s likely to be the people accused of abuse. My concern is not for them, because I believe they’re guilty – but that’s only my opinion and because it hasn’t been tested in the courts I can’t prove it.

Just as they can’t prove they’re innocent. We’re supposed to be free to express our opinions in this country, but you wouldn’t think so from the way the publishing industry has reacted so far. I’ve approached over 30 agents and publishers and they have all said no.

Well, I say no too. No to pretending that families always provide ideal homes. No to abusing victims twice, the second time by refusing to believe them. I say no to depriving children of support, to making professionals unable to protect children properly. No to covering up the darker aspects of human nature till we’re absolutely forced to acknowledge them. Do we always have to wait till people are dead before we’re brave enough to expose them? To my knowledge, former prime minister Edward Heath was reported by at least five people to have been involved in satanic ceremonies. But the people who reported him were patients, so who could believe them? Right?

If I sound angry it’s because I am. Allegations of varying kinds of sexual abuse against Heath have now been received in eight different police authorities. The current inquiry, involving 4500 boxes of Heath’s personal papers, is being overseen by Wiltshire Police, who were investigated by the Independent Police Complaints Commission in 2015 for allegedly failing to follow up similar accusations in the 1990s. Well, maybe they’ll get it right this time, when there’s no powerful political figure to go up against, when officers won’t slide down the promotions ladder because they’ve offended the wrong person. Maybe the press, society’s guard dog, will get it right now there’s no danger of being sued for libel. There is, after all, no risk in accusing a dead person.

The convictions, the ritual shamings of perpetrators, the public apologies are always, always, too late.

atomicbadgerrace #fundie boards.straightdope.com

You do have a reason to believe that, though. He's already told you he wants to. The fact that he's said he won't act on his pathology as long as it's illegal is hardly enough of a safety net to allow him unfettered access to children.?

What, are we living in Minority Report now? Sorry, but the disbelief that someone is capable of resisting their urges isn't enough to warrant 24/7 surveillance and potential removal from their workplace, IMO.

Really, what is it exactly you'd be "reporting" him for, aside from inappropriate discussion in the workplace? Or is that the angle -- get him on that, and use it as an excuse to dismiss the creepy pedophile you don't trust?

I'd be reporting that someone entrusted with taking care of children has said that he'd like to rape them. It's not fucking complicated, You keep the fucking perverts away from the children. Jesus, I can't believe this place sometimes.

Well, I guess you mean reporting to the employer and not the police, since I don't think *wanting* to rape a child is a crime.

So that's all you'd say to the employer? Omitting the part about how he absolutely refuses to act on his desires? And then expecting all work history up to that point to be disregarded, so that the disgusting, creepy pedophile can be thrown on the street where he belongs?

So you're willing to wait around until AFTER he's already raped a baby (a BABY) to decide wether it's dangerous to let someone who says he wants to rape babies take care of babies?

That's how the legal system works. Or should we open up a precrime department and fix the world your way?

Entirely irrelevant, but I was abstracting on the john, and it occurs to me that this kind of workplace interaction wouldn't happen to begin with if the pedophile in question didn't think you'd believe him when he said he refused to act on his desires.

Kind of like if your best friend told you in confidence, "man, your girlfriend is so, so sexy. If you weren't dating her, I'd hit it so hard. Oh god, I'd love to be with her, but while you're dating her, I wouldn't do anything." Do you still trust them to hang out alone?

Wayne Allyn Root #fundie foxnews.com

Why I'm (still) betting big on Donald Trump to win

Every mainstream media outlet in the country keeps saying Trump is losing badly. They say this as if it’s fact. And based on many polls, it does look that way.

But so did Brexit. That was the vote for UK to leave the EU. No one anywhere in the establishment…or media…or any major politician thought it would pass.

But it did.

I believe this is our Brexit. And I’m putting my money where my mouth is. I’m betting big on Donald Trump to win the election. Here’s why.

I had the honor of attending the presidential debate as a guest of Donald Trump in my adopted hometown of Las Vegas.

My day began with a taste of what the Washington establishment and so-called “experts” think of the race. I was a guest on “Fox & Friends.” On one side of me was a Democrat political strategist from D.C. predicting a Clinton victory. On the other side was a Republican strategist from Washington predicting a Clinton victory. Both felt the presidential race was already over and Clinton could be headied for a landslide victory. That’s the thinking from Washington.

Which is fascinating. I call it “group think." Both of these political gurus would probably lose a ton of income if Trump wins. I guarantee they both hang out with all the same kind of establishment people…go to the same parties…read the same newspapers…study the same biased polls that oversample Democrats. No wonder they come to the same conclusions.

But they are not alone. Every time I turn on any TV or radio station, all I hear is predictions of doom and gloom for Trump. The national media seems to have already printed the headline, “Dewey Beats Truman.” You remember how that ended.

Yes, I understand why they think Trump is finished. Most of the national polls show Donald behind by 4 to 12 points. But didn’t all the experts and pollsters predict Trump’s demise every step of the way during the GOP primaries too? I’ve predicted his success since day one -- starting right here at Fox News on the day he declared for president.

More importantly, why is the media ignoring the polls predicting Trump is in the lead? I'm betting you've never heard a word about these polls in the media.

Rasmussen has Trump up by 43-41 percent.

USC/LA Times has Trump up by 1 point.

And most importantly, the most accurate poll of the 2012 election, IBD/TIPP has Trump up 43 to 41 percent.

Funny how the mainstream media doesn’t mention these polls.

But there are many signs this year is different and pollsters cannot accurately measure the direction of the electorate.

Trump attracts 10,000 or more crazed fans to his events. Hillary attracts 200 to 500. And most of those attendees are Democrat Party employees or union hacks paid to be there! The exact number since August 1 is 561,000 for Trump events vs 31,000 for Hillary events.

Hillary can’t even sell her new book. As of this moment, it’s #5,568 at Amazon. It’s brand new. It’s written by the most high-profile woman in the world. She has had an audience of over 60 million watching each of the past three presidential debates. Yet no one is buying her book.

The signs are everywhere. Literally.

My best friend’s wife drove this weekend from DC to Florida. She saw hundreds of Trump signs on lawns, on barns, on highway overpasses. She saw one Gary Johnson sign. But there wasn’t one Hillary sign. Not one.

Then there’s the dramatic drop in NFL ratings. My friends are all NFL fans. This is due to the anger of the people I wrote about in my new book “ANGRY WHITE MALE.” This is the same "Silent Majority" who are boycotting the NFL over disrespect for the flag by NFL players.

This is "the Trump effect" at work. My friends are angry and motivated. The media just doesn’t understand what’s happening on Main Street.

Then there’s the kind of polls I trust. My friend is a Vegas cab driver. She starts every new ride with this conversation opener, “Welcome to Vegas. Now let’s talk about the election. Who are you voting for?” In the privacy of her cab, with no one watching or judging, every single passenger in the past two weeks has whispered “TRUMP.” Yes, all of them.

So what gives? I’ve predicted this in the media for three months now. This is our Brexit. None of the experts saw Brexit coming. Only the people on Main Street knew.

Here’s some facts to back up my contention. William Hill, one of the largest legal bookmakers in the world, warned days ago that the betting patterns of this election look exactly like Brexit.

All the big bets they’ve taken are on Clinton. They report 71 percent of the money is on Hillary. Just like Brexit.

But 65 percent of the actual bets are on Trump. The little guys are all betting on Trump. Guess who determines the outcome of elections? The little guys. They’re betting their $5 and $10 on Trump. Just like Brexit.

I’ll take the Vegas cab driver’s poll over the fancy D.C. pollsters any day.

I’ll take the betting patterns at legal bookmakers.

I’ll take the sign of a massive drop in NFL ratings.

I’ll take the size of the crowds at Trump rallies.

I’ll take the signs along the road for Trump vs none for Hillary.

The signs are all there. Something is happening that the DC experts and mainstream media can’t see, or understand. Or maybe they just don't want to.

This is our Brexit. And I’m betting big on Trump.

President Donald Trump #conspiracy #sexist #wingnut usatoday.com

[WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump on Tuesday attacked Sen. Kamala Harris over her questioning of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearings in his first public remarks since she was named Joe Biden's running mate.

Harris, a former prosecutor, grilled the judge over sexual misconduct allegations against him during the contentious 2018 confirmation hearings.

"And the horrible way she treated Justice Kavanaugh, that was a horrible event. I thought it was terrible for her, I thought it was terrible for our nation," Trump told reporters during a White House briefing. "I thought she was the meanest, the most horrible most disrespectful of anybody in the U.S. Senate."

Trump saved his remarks on Harris for the scheduled briefing. But minutes after the announcement, Trump tweeted a new campaign attack ad on Harris, a vocal critic of the president. The ad accuses Biden of "handing over the reins to Kamala while they jointly embrace the radical left."

"She is also known, from what I understand, as being just about the most liberal person in the U.S. Senate and I would have thought Biden would have tried to stay away from that a little bit," Trump said.

Biden announced Harris, one of his former Democratic primary challengers, as his No. 2 pick after weeks of speculation in the lead-up to next week's Democratic convention. She will become the first Black woman and first Asian American person on a major party's presidential ticket.

Following the announcement, the Trump campaign seized on a feisty exchange between Harris and Biden during a June 2019 Democratic debate, when the California senator was still in the race. Harris challenged Biden over his remarks about working with segregationist senators and criticized him for his previous opposition to federal busing mandates – a moment that hobbled his campaign and led to her brief surge in national polls.

"Not long ago, Kamala Harris called Joe Biden a racist and asked for an apology she never received. Clearly, Phony Kamala will abandon her own morals, as well as try to bury her record as a prosecutor, in order to appease the anti-police extremists controlling the Democrat Party," Trump senior adviser Katrina Pierson said in a statement Tuesday.

"She is proof that Joe Biden is an empty shell being filled with the extreme agenda of the radicals on the left," Pierson added.

OverBeforeItBegan #sexist incels.co

Claiming you have depression as a female should be considered a hate crime against incels

There is nothing worse than being mocked by a hole living life on "press x to win" mode who says that she has depression. If you're an above 1/10 female in the 21st century you can literally never experience any hardships. Since birth you were coddled by society, treated like a queen who can do no wrong. Whatever you do, wherever you go you'll always be able to find love from literally hundreds of guys worshiping you. Compare that to an incel who had to spend years in isolation, treated like a piece of shit solely because of his genes. Completely cast out of society because of something he has no control over.

There's this female I know from school saying she has depression because the whore got drunk and took drugs at a house party 2 years ago with strangers and got raped. She made a post about it on facebook, talking about how hard her life is. The comments that people left were absolute ragefuel. Everyone was talking about
how the poor, innocent victim didn't deserve it even though it's her fault for being fucking stupid.

I obviously don't condone rape, but I still fail to understand how getting raped as a female is such a traumatic experience. Wow, you took one extra dick from an ugly guy. Big deal. If anything, it only increases your natural vagina privileges tenfold. You'll pretty much be able to live the rest of your life living such a life that you would have made actual queens jealous.
It's a completely different story if you're a man. Your entire masculinity would be shattered. You'd be seen as a weak, pathetic cuck until the day you die. No man and especially no woman would ever see you as anything more than a little bitch. If you were to actually have the nerve to make a post about it on facebook you'd probably end up getting raped again.

TL;DR: Claiming to have depression as a hole because tutorial island asked you to perform a 2 button combo should be punishable by law.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

Today, the average woman laughs at the Biblical teaching that a woman ought to dress "in modest apparel" (1st Timothy 2:9), sending a proper message of virtue and chastity by her ladylike clothing. In sharp contrast, the average woman today sees nothing even remotely wrong with wearing tight pants or a miniskirt to deliberately arouse men. It's a game to a lot of women, and they think it's sexually healthy for men. The truth is that women who wear inappropriate attire are causing men to commit adultery in their hearts (Matthew 5:28). Jesus said in Matthew 15:19... "For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies." It all begins in the heart. Child molesting begins in the heart. Rape and adultery begin in the heart. Is it any wonder why Jeremiah 17:9 states: "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" When a woman wears seductive clothing, teasing a man, you don't know what is going on in his heart. You may become the victim of a rape, or cause a little child to be raped, or worse.

jeremyjimmy #sexist reddit.com

(Note: This is an amalgam of three different comments)

You'd think that people from IncelTears would be more angered by these. They're complaining about their privilege.

Also what happened to them being able to gauge personality? I'm not an incel but the blackpill idea is like 90% dead on. I don't know why people are so dishonest and want men to be so unprepared as teens entering the dating world by feeding them endless lies about female nature. Women are completely prepared for what men will want from them and what drives them. Meanwhile the second anyone with any experiences starts to nail down female sexuality the entire western media starts bucking like a horse with a rubber band around it's balls.

edit: Also I haven't seen anyone make this point before but extremist feminists have done everything that they claim to hate about incels. Yet why aren't they going after them? There have been feminist murderers, terrorists and sites actually full of women aborting their male babies, planning evil shit to do to their male children and on and on it goes. I mean out in public women were saying "kill all men" on Twitter. Nobody really cared. In fact from my experience feminists have done a lot worse than incels. Most incels are just harmless guys venting about the lies they were told as children.

.
.
.

I know from personal experience about all this shit, then I found incels and saw that they have it all down to a science. I guess I'm "chad lite" on the ratings scale so even with crippling social anxiety would get girls and even my friends girls kept trying to fuck me which started to make me look down on them. (You hear comedians and musicians talk about this, married women trying to fuck them and just saying "so?" when they say "but you're married".) Then I went through a stage where I got really sick, lost all my physique and looked terrible. I'm not exaggerating when I say that women started treating me COMPLETELY different. They'd actually give me looks of disgust. My friends noticed too.

Then I got better, worked out, got everything back to how it was and suddenly strange girls are being nice again. One who was horrible to me even suddenly started asking a friend if I was single. It turned me into a complete pessimist. But if someone would've told me when I was younger the truth about female sexuality it wouldn't have bothered me at all. Girls being attracted to me would say I was funny and they liked that I had various talents. Meanwhile when I looked like shit they stopped laughing at my jokes and didn't care about my talent or intelligence. Weird huh?

Male sexuality is well known, it's part of our culture to understand it. Meanwhile female sexuality is shrowded in mystery and called "complicated". We're animals. It's not complicated. I fucking can't stand how men can't explore and discuss this stuff without all being called terrorists or something insane like that. Meanwhile feminists say "kill all men" feminists make bomb threats, murder people, cut men's dicks off and if you group them in with feminists you get the old no true Scotsman fallacy. "They're not true feminists." Oh right, then that one guy who said something about incels online isn't really an incel. It's all so frustrating. Yet they sit there with these puzzled looks, wondering why men are suddenly all being so mean. If it was women rising up like this they'd try to understand, look for the root cause and fix it, the cause of negative female behavior is always external. (Abusive father/husband/single motherhood is tough!) With men it's always internal. (Toxic masculinity/he's just evil/a psychopath etc.) But if it's guys then it's just inherent as if men can't be influenced by the outside world.

It's all so fucking petty and will have to come to a head somewhere. Things will HAVE to start moving back the other way because they're becoming too unstable. I was honestly stunned when I found out about groups like Incel Tears. They've found some of the most lonely, depressed people on Earth and are attacking them for making some offensive jokes. People in terrible situations cope with dark humor, it's pretty much well known. It really is just an excuse to bully these guys. I think all of this is instinctual and that people try to rationalize it afterwards. This is the case with almost all beliefs and behavior. People react based on emotion and animal instinct and then try to act rationally after the fact. People HATE weak guys, they mock them, people want to help weak women and women in need.

Like I remember asking a feminist what she thought about a 14 year old guy whose teacher raped him, got pregnant and had the child. He then had to pay child support at age 18. If he DIDN'T PAY HIS RAPIST HE'D GO TO PRISON. I got called a rape apologist. There's zero sympathy for men. Meanwhile Muslim women who get raped and imprisoned on the technicality of adultery are seen as victims who need to be saved. I want to save both yet I'm the fucking rape apologist. I'd love to know if there's any kind of science exploring how people react to men and women in various situations because I'm convinced that all of this insane behavior is to do with reproduction and protecting offspring in the past. None of it makes any sense in today's culture but it just FEELS wrong to say that so people hang onto it. It's all a fucking mess.

.
.
.

True. And those in the center just learn to become content with their existence and make themselves as busy as possible. It's like with depression. Depressed people perceive reality FAR more accurately then regular people. I guess the black pill would be depressed people and the blue pill regular people.

I think you might be right about things going too far. What I should've said is that if they don't move back they'll probably collapse which will fix things anyway. Awareness can still be raised, we see groups like MGTOW growing and also a curious thing that people overlook is a lot of chad lites and "normies" joining incel forums just to be able to post. There's a good reason for that, because most people have noticed this stuff but either haven't been able to put it into words or they feel like they have nobody to talk to about it.

You're right about experiencing both sides. I'd never really thought about this stuff until I got those disgusted looks. I guess it's similar to that experiment where that woman disguised herself as a man for a year or something and suddenly found out that most of what we're told about guys is bullshit and that she was treated like shit on sight by most women. I think she actually had to go to therapy afterwards lol.

I've been thinking of making a Youtube channel for a while. I've been interested in this stuff for years among other subjects so I might give it a go. I think I can present it in a way where regular people won't instantly switch off.

Freddie the Freeloader #fundie speakout.com

(So if you were gang-raped by a bunch of guys, you'd be gay? Why not rape a bunch of lesbians and turn them all straight? If you believe your crap, you are not only an idiot, but completely without a reasoning mind. Sexuality doesn't CHANGE for any reason. Drugs turn you gay? Why are most drug users STRAIGHT then?)

Again the stupidest of replies. You ignorant fag! Rape is not choice. What idiots like you do is CHOICE. If a pedophile rapes a child, nobody denies that's a choice, and he goes to prison. Yet he has urges just like cocaine sniffing idiots like you. What a moron. Stop sniffing and injecting and maybe you will get a coherent thought instead of pulling this brown stuff out of your ass!

Darrel #fundie kasuto.net

You know, when we started this war, I was so angry I couldn't see straight. I wanted to see them suffer for killing our countrymen. For coming onto our territory and starting something up. Saddam is an evil man and needed to be taken out..even if he doesn't have to do with 9/11. Think about it - he was gassing his own people! It's cruelty to just turn and look the other way, knowing that people are dying. It's like Germany and the holocaust (atleast then we didn't know exactly). We may not be the "world police," but I think someone has to look out for those who can't look out for themselves. I wish America had come into Germany long before it did; I'd have the majority of my family. But all I have is my grandma, her brother, and her sister. Everyone else died on my mother's side. (Until people realize that Saddam = bad, I'm going to keep repeating this story.)

Most of America makes me sick. It has no memory. "Der, what's a flag?! What's Nationalism?! EL OH EL! I HATE AMERICA EVEN THOUGH I'M AMERICAN!" I wish I could just ship all of these people back to their "native" country so that America will have a little more elbow room and a little more common sense. If you hate America and are living in it, then GET THE FUCK OUT!!!! We don't want you here, bashing your own country, and bashing those in it. I don't like to be called an 'idiot' just because a big majority of America is stupid. Hell, a lot of America is the smartest, too (Bill Gates, anyone?), and we have some of the highest technology. But I see that that is overlooked.

If I could have my way, I would blow up just about the entire world. I'd bomb Canada for calling us stupid Americans, I'd bomb the UK because they have their head up their butts and think America is foolish and never ever has common sense what-so-ever, and I'd bomb Mt. Fuji in Japan because the damn Japos are racists!! XD (That really doesn't have to do with the state we're in, but I felt I had to include it. Come on, laugh! :3) Pretty much the only places I wouldn't bomb would be the poles and Australia. Rest of the world can kiss my patriotic ass, because I'm sick and tired of them always ganging up on me like I'm a bad guy. I never did anything - look at our side for once. Yes, we're evil because we go in and attack people, but we're also good too. We supply places with food, medicine, and rush out immediately to go help.

Here's an idea, and I wish I could give it to Mr. President ;
Let's become isolated for one week. There is proof that we could run on our own without any exports or imports. It wouldn't be as decent quality of life, but it would be doable. We should not go out and help anyone, trade with anyone, or do anything with any other country. Pull right out Iraq, Iran, Korea, all of those places, and especially Africa. No longer help anyone - just help ourselves. We'll see how well the world can survive without America.

(I personally think we should go into other countries and stop their fighting and tell them what to do. They're like children fighting; someone has to be the responsible adult and break up the fight. If they can't see that they are fighting like little children, then someone has to prove it to them and make it stop. We can't have the world falling to pieces because the "UK" is afraid of stopping it.)

[ on abortion ]

I am against abortion.

o sum this up, rape/abortion victims seem to have a more negative outcome than a woman who was raped and kept her child. Emotionally, she is weakened from the rape, and losing her own child will take it's toll. Physically, she may never have children again.
"Good can come from evil." Rape is evil, and a baby is good.

I'm kind of in the middle of this whole thing. I see both sides. I don't agree with either (but I do agree mostly on no to abortion)
I don't know about the mother health thing though. I mean, if she's going to die, at least she lived a good life (hopefully), and the baby would get to live. Mothers usually love their children, and would give up their life for their children. Most women feel this motherly bond. They would hope their baby got to live a good life, and make something out of themselves. It's a choice the mother should make, but on the downfall, the baby will never get to live if the mother gets the abortion.

[ on war ]

If I could have my way, I would blow up just about the entire world. I'd bomb Canada for calling us stupid Americans, I'd bomb the UK because they have their head up their butts and think America is foolish and never ever has common sense what-so-ever, and I'd bomb Mt. Fuji in Japan because the damn Japos are racists!! XD (That really doesn't have to do with the state we're in, but I felt I had to include it. Come on, laugh! :3) Pretty much the only places I wouldn't bomb would be the poles and Australia. Rest of the world can kiss my patriotic ass, because I'm sick and tired of them always ganging up on me like I'm a bad guy. I never did anything - look at our side for once. Yes, we're evil because we go in and attack people, but we're also good too. We supply places with food, medicine, and rush out immediately to go help.

Here's an idea, and I wish I could give it to Mr. President Bush;
Let's become isolated for one week. There is proof that we could run on our own without any exports or imports. It wouldn't be as decent quality of life, but it would be doable. We should not go out and help anyone, trade with anyone, or do anything with any other country. Pull right out Iraq, Iran, Korea, all of those places, and especially Africa. No longer help anyone - just help ourselves. We'll see how well the world can survive without America.

(I personally think we should go into other countries and stop their fighting and tell them what to do. They're like children fighting; someone has to be the responsible adult and break up the fight. If they can't see that they are fighting like little children, then someone has to prove it to them and make it stop. We can't have the world falling to pieces because the "UK" is afraid of stopping it.)
(^?^)?(^?^)

Censored One #sexist iamanatheist.com

As I predicted you like banging the rape drum. Yes, I know that rape is bad but you have to admit that there are a lot of worse things, like terminal disease, loss of a limb, or despair. I know it’s humiliating but when it’s over it’s over, not like cancer.

Yes, a Christian woman suffers less from rape than another woman. Are you asking me if I think rapists should go after Christian women? Well if they do they will be faced with the strength and will of the Lord and may even come to His side when they see how little their pathetic abuse can do to a woman of faith!

No you didn’t misunderstand about why rape is a sin. It makes no sense for it to be a sin for a man to rape his wife since a man can’t rape his wife. It’s just not logical, like stealing your own car or pocking your own pocket.

Maybe you got raped and enjoy harping on it. Well the whole world doesn’t revolve around you. Get over it, clear your head and come to God. [Emphasis added]

svrn #fundie triweeklyantifeminist.wordpress.com

>if there should be any AOC at all

There shouldn’t.
The ancient laws were better:
If you raped a na’ar (child) who was still in her father’s house, you kept her and payed the father for her. No age of consent spoken of.

This also stopped fathers from entering a conspiracy to deny everyone young girls as brides (like what happened in America, by the will of the moronic white man)

Eruan #fundie stoptheaclu.org

Myself? I don't think that abortion should be allowed in any circumstances. Yes, I know that it's not a woman's fault when she gets pregnant due to rape. Well... sorry, but life isn't perfect. There still is a child in her, and killing the baby won't make the rape not have happened. I'm sorry if the child reminds her of the horrific incident; she can put him or her up for adoption. If someone must die for the rape, it should be the rapist.

What about if the woman would die in childbirth? Again, sorry. There really isn't any greater love than to give one's life for another. If a person was stuck on a mountain and they had a child handcuffed to them, and for some reason he would die if he didn't kill the child (somehow that would set him free and allow him to get away, shut up it's just an illustration), does that make it right for him to kill the child? It wouldn't hold up in the court of law, that's for sure.

Dhoppe #fundie hannity.com

I agree that if you have a 6 year old that thinks they are gay... then the police need to be notified... because you have a pediphile in the family. There is only way way to know if a child is gay. So while the Child is still a child... what values will you teach them? Children learn by example... and if the example is that men are sperm donars and fathers are worthless.. then the female has a much greater chance of treating men WHEN THEY GET OLDER as such... and the male has a greater chance of having NO RESPECT for women. Which FYI is EXACTLY why divorce is so high today. We are failing our children... and raising them that failure is ok and that failure should be embraced.

kugel #fundie reddit.com

(butyourenice)

It's fucking creepy because a 16-year-old is mentally underdeveloped and in many ways still a child, regardless of physical development. Hell your brain does not stop developing until your mid-20s, but teenagers especially lack the frontal lobe development that would allow them to accurately gauge risk and develop informed inhibition. If you think the distinction between a 16-year-old and a 24-year-old is "arbitrary" (because what? They both have tits?), then yeah... Maybe you do belong on some list.
I've already addressed the difference between legality and morality in another comment. Your* entire rant relies on legality being the sole boundary between right and wrong, not to mention you've entirely missed the point of what I said in favor of listening to yourself harp about how adults should be allowed to have sex with kids

the reason my rant relies on the LEGALITY of a topic discussion LEGAL AGE OF CONSENT should be fairly obvious. Also you will note in my comment I state that I think an adult having sex with a 16 year old isnt right. I have taken a stance on morality. My comment was focusing solely on the legal aspect, and I agree with you on the morality part (which you would understand if you read my comment with any level of reading comprehension).My comment doesnt "rely" on the legality issue, i just decided that I would only join in on the debate on the legality side of things. That would be like saying a physics paper "enirely relies on the laws of physics". well no shit, its a specific paper that specializes in that one topic, that doesnt mean that I dont acknowledge all other fields of study just because I wrote something up about one of them.

But anyway, It doesnt matter what is morally wrong, or creepy, the law doesnt cater to your personal code of ethics. And that is my point. Just because someone else is immoral and unethical by YOUR standards does not mean it is immoral and unethical by everyone elses standards. And it certainly doesnt mean we should throw people in jail and ruin their lives because you, specifically you /u/butyourenice dont agree with it. The entire population of a country should follow exactly your moral code? get the fuck out of here you pretentious fuck. Is cheating on your spouse immoral and unethical? yes. Is it immoral and unethical to deny a hungry child food because he doesnt have enough money to pay for it? yes. Is it illegal to cheat on your wife or expect payment for your goods? Im not saying having sex with a 16 year old as a 65 year old ISNT unethical or immoral, what Im saying is that it doesnt matter. Legality is what the state has decided is right and wrong, and everyone living there is forced to follow it. Morality and ethics is how you personally chose to live your life. So if something is legal, then it doesnt matter whether or not you find it immoral, because someone else might not and they have every right to do so just like you. Im not saying having sex with a 16 year old isnt morally wrong, Im saying morality is highly subjective and personal, so if your morals say you shouldnt have sex with a 16 year old as an adult, then there is an easy solution. Dont have sex with a 16 year old as an adult. See? problem solved. And if someone else doesnt think that it is immoral and does have sex with a 16 year old as an adult, then guess what? they have their own set of morals and code of ethics that they chose to live their life by, and thats fine because they arent you, so your morals dont fucking matter to them! Its such an easy concept, but you people who think the whole world should cater only to people who share the exact same opinions and lifestyle as themselves are narrow minded and ignorant. Are 16 year old girls old enough and developed enough to decide if they should have sex? are you a 16 year old girl? Are all 16 year olds the exact same level of maturity? Yes it is something that needs to be determined on a case by case basis. And its a good thing that because it is legal, and rape is still illegal, then having sex as a 16 year old is a choice that they are free to make. If they have a parent/guardian who helps them make that decision, even better. But 16 year olds have a lot of decisions and responsibilities in their lives that require a much higher level of maturity than being allowed to have a penis inside of them.

RhydonHerSlowbro #transphobia reddit.com

(response to “What’s an issue that you can’t have an honest debate about on Reddit?”)

Disagreeing with the politically correct modern culture, the only thing I disagree with personally is the transgender community (Unpopular opinion I know.) but hear me out.

The common misconception to this point of view is that to disagree with it is complete and utter belligerent ignorance, not a logically based counterpoint, but still a perfectly valid one.

When it comes to having this discussion with people, I don’t know any of them (and I use the term ‘them’ as an example of the specific person I’m having the conversation with, NOT classing all persons of the community the same.) - I don’t know any of them from Adam, they could be the nicest person in the world, they could go on to cure cancer, I don’t know who they are.

My argument is that in life, even from birth, you have to play with hand you’re dealt, some people have small penises, some are too tall/short/fat/skinny, more importantly, some people are born without limbs, or the ability to see or hear or taste or smell. You’re either born a male or female, as unfortunate as that may be to you, that’s the way it is, you cannot ask people to identify you otherwise, if I were to go out and hook up with a Post-op “female”, and let’s say the operation was a rousing success and I was completely unable to tell the difference as to whether or not this person was born female or chose to be operated upon, and at some stage the relationship becomes successful, but I was never told about them being trans and had no knowledge of it, I would one day want to have kids, and I wouldn’t be able to, and I would feel completely cheated and lied to. (I understand that I would have been in love with that person, but the point still stands that even from that first night, I’d have still been lied to.)

I just, there’s more to it than that obviously that’s just one example, I don’t want to be writing all day on this, but it’s just one of those things, basically I disagree with it, and to have a reasonable discussion on it without it degrading into horrible accusations and abusive comments, seems near-impossible.

I’m more than open to having my opinion changed on the matter, but it seems generally having a strong opinion on only one subject, leads you to being a right-wing but job. :/

I’m not racist, agist, I’m not really for or against anything else. Woman obviously should have the rights to abortion in some areas of America for example the fact that they don’t is complete lunacy, guns graded above a handgun/hunting rifle should be banned over there (preferably all guns but that’ll never happen sadly.)

But yeah, I have one opinion I’d like to debate about, but it’s such a touchy subject.

Edit:

I read this somewhere, I don’t know if it’s crazy or genius :’)

“You can scientifically manipulate an Apple to look like, smell like, even taste like an Orange, if I told you it was an Orange and you ate it, you’d believe me, no doubt about it, BUT if I took the seeds from the new Orange out and planted them, they’d still grow Apples.”

G33kchic #fundie reddit.com

Your friend wants you to help them hide a body. No info provided. They "don't want to talk about it". Do you help?


Depends on which friend it was. There's like.. one person who I'm not related to in any way that I would blindly help.


Even with no information at all?

I think I'd help, but keep asking, and if they still wouldn't tell then I might need to consider my next move.

I trust this particular friend with my life. If he needed help, I'd help him.


What if it's the body of say....a child, like 5/6yo?

What if you'd heard one was missing in your local area and the parents were doing tv appeals?

Not wanting to be confrontational or a dick, just wondering how far your unconditional support goes...

At what point might you demand info?


But I know my friend well enough. It wouldn't be any of that. And if it was, of course id have questions and I would ask..but I'd still help him. God forbid I find myself in some kind of situation and would need his help. He'd help me just liKe I'd help him. He's a good person. Id trust him.

I probably would give him a day before I was demanding info.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Re: Chemtrails Still Full Force With New President Trump

I'd say he ought make it against the law to spray us like bugs for to make us sick. But he won't do it. He won't outlaw adding fluoride to the water. He won't make an EO to force the labeling of GMO foods, either. Why!

I'll bet the President's family have the best air and water filters available, and I'll bet they eat nothing but organically grown foods. The rest of us? Well, our money goes to support the entire health industry from cradle to early graves.

Shame on Trump.

oh-snap-pro-lifers #fundie oh-snap-pro-lifers.tumblr.com

["You're not aiding anyone at all, you're only making it miserable for everyone else. If your child had been raped and had become pregnant, you lot would think far differently. If you didn't give her the abortion you're all selfish, brainwashed monsters."]

If my child were raped and became pregnant I would think no differently. She would still be carrying a human being. It would not be selfish of me to prevent her from getting an abortion. She probably wouldn’t think of having one in the first place because she’ll respect human life. My grandchild would not deserve to die because of how they were conceived. She’d have all the help and love she would need in recovering and in raising the child. Abortion is permanent if she one day realized she would’ve like to have kept the baby there would be nothing she could do about it. I would never want my daughter to go through a thing like that. To feel the pain of that kind of regret.

I’m sorry you felt the need to be so hateful to people who want to save lives. Maybe you just don’t understand the base of our position.

Bricktop #sexist arguewitheveryone.com

The very first human intercourse was a rape, women have a hymen. Every intercourse after that is still a "rape" because women still have hymens. Women are not supposed to be poked by men, they were all lesbians until one day a freak of nature was born and he got saddled with "God". All men are women first when they develop in the womb, they just have overgrown clits. Female ejaculation contains trace amounts of semen and that's how the ancient female reproductive system reproduced before men "raped" them.

In essence, all sex is rape. Am I going to complain? No, I have a gun to shoot down any "rapist" that enters my home.

Roosh #fundie rooshv.com

I keep reading in the mainstream media that there is a rape culture in the United States. This issue concerns me since I have a sister who I don’t want to be raped, so I carefully examined the articles on Salon, Buzzfeed, and Huffington Post that were written by professional journalists who pursue truth and justice over mass hysteria and delirium.

What I’ve gathered from the words of these future Pulitzer Prize winners is that women are not getting raped by violent offenders while taking a jog in the park or walking through a dark street—they are getting raped by men they already know, especially at college. I learned that if a man and a woman both drink at a party and have sex, she was in all likelihood raped since she could not give full legal consent. This made me confused because a woman who drinks and has sex is not responsible for her actions, but if that same woman gets into a car and drives it into someone else, causing a loss of life, she would be prosecuted and sent to jail. I couldn’t find an explanation for this inconsistency.

I also read that men must be taught not to rape, which means that they are all born with the capability to rape and have zero instinct to know that taking a woman with violence is improper. Thankfully, a man only has to be told the phrase “rape is bad” at some point after puberty by an overweight feminist to definitively stop his future brutal and bloody rape career. It’s a miracle that more men have not raped their mothers, babysitters, and sisters before being taught in college that rape is actually not a good thing.

I knew from an early age that rape was bad, as was all forms of violence, not just against women but men as well. I also knew that killing, stealing, and having sexual interest in relatives was bad. I don’t remember if someone specifically taught me these rules, but I also don’t remember being taught that the sun rises and sets once a day, or that I will go splat if I jump off a tall building. I don’t know of a single man entering adulthood who thought that rape was good and had to be manually taught it was bad in order to stop him from raping, so when journalists and cultural commentators suggest that the best way to defeat rape culture is to teach men not to rape, I couldn’t possibly agree. I saw a different set of problems instead.

I saw women wholly unconcerned with their own safety and the character of men they developed intimate relationships with. I saw women who voluntarily numbed themselves with alcohol and other drugs in social settings before letting the direction of the night’s wind determine who they would follow into a private room. I saw women who, once feeling awkward, sad, or guilty for a sexual encounter they didn’t fully remember, call upon an authority figure to resolve the problem by locking up her previous night’s lover in prison or ejecting him from school.

By attempting to teach men not to rape, what we have actually done is teach women not to care about being raped, not to protect themselves from easily preventable acts, and not to take responsibility for their actions. At the same time, we don’t hesitate to blame men for bad things that happen to them (if right now you walked into a dangerous ghetto and got robbed, you would be called an idiot and no one would say “teach ghetto kids not to steal”). It was obvious to me that the advice of our esteemed establishment writers and critics wasn’t stopping the problem, and since rape was already on the law books with severe penalties, additional laws or flyers posted on dormitory doors won’t stop this rape culture either.

I thought about this problem and am sure I have the solution: make rape legal if done on private property. I propose that we make the violent taking of a woman not punishable by law when done off public grounds.

The exception for public rape is aimed at those seedy and deranged men who randomly select their rape victims on alleys and jogging trails, but not as a mechanism to prevent those rapes, since the verdict is still out if punishment stops a committed criminal mind, but to have a way to keep them off the streets. For all other rapes, however, especially if done in a dwelling or on private property, any and all rape that happens should be completely legal.

If rape becomes legal under my proposal, a girl will protect her body in the same manner that she protects her purse and smartphone. If rape becomes legal, a girl will not enter an impaired state of mind where she can’t resist being dragged off to a bedroom with a man who she is unsure of—she’ll scream, yell, or kick at his attempt while bystanders are still around. If rape becomes legal, she will never be unchaperoned with a man she doesn’t want to sleep with. After several months of advertising this law throughout the land, rape would be virtually eliminated on the first day it is applied.

Without daddy government to protect her, a girl would absolutely not enter a private room with a man she doesn’t know or trust unless she is absolutely sure she is ready to sleep with him. Consent is now achieved when she passes underneath the room’s door frame, because she knows that that man can legally do anything he wants to her when it comes to sex. Bad encounters are sure to occur, but these can be learning experiences for the poorly trained woman so she can better identify in the future the type of good man who will treat her like the delicate flower that she believes she is. After only one such sour experience, she will actually want to get fully acquainted with a man for longer than two hours—perhaps even demanding to meet his parents—instead of letting a beer chug prevent her from making the correct decisions to protect her body.

The benefits of eradicating rape laws would extend to honest men who unfortunately now live in fear over imprisonment in the case the girl they had sex with had a blood alcohol level of 0.04 instead of 0.05 or some other arbitrary, untested, and made-up value that may imply consent was not fully achieved. There is no more having to guess the interpretation of a woman’s mixed signals or to artificially amp up her base emotions with clownish banter. Because women will never enter a man’s apartment without accepting that sex will happen, he can escort her to his bedroom and romantically consummate a relationship after it was certain he proved himself to be a good and decent man the woman fully trusted. My proposal eliminates anxiety and unfair persecution for men while empowering women to make adult decisions about their bodies.

It turns out that we don’t need more laws, policies, and university propaganda that treat every man like a criminal and every woman like a mild retardate—we need more common sense that can only come from making rape legal. Such a change will provide a mature jolt to American women who have been babied for too long, who are protected and coddled as if they have no agency or intellect of their own. If a woman is indeed a child then maybe we really need to keep promoting “rape culture” as a way to keep them safe, but if they are actual adults, which is often claimed, then we can start treating them like adults by allowing them to take responsibility for the things that happen to them which are easily preventable with barely a strain of cognitive thought, awareness, and self control.

Let’s make rape legal. Less women will be raped because they won’t voluntarily drug themselves with booze and follow a strange man into a bedroom, and less men will be unfairly jailed for what was anything but a maniacal alley rape. Until then, this devastating rape culture will continue, and women who we treat as children will continue to act like children.

Carol Brown #conspiracy #wingnut americanthinker.com

In 100 days, communists could be set to run the White House

The stark reality of what a Biden puppet presidency would mean has come into view. It is, to say the least, absolutely terrifying.

But questions remain about whether he'll even be the nominee, and if so, if he'll make it to Election Day in this role.

First, can anyone imagine Biden debating Trump? I can't.

The left is already scrambling to figure out how to leverage the situation to get Biden out of this commitment, such as demanding Trump release his tax returns in exchange for Biden's participation in the debates. No doubt more schemes will emerge in the coming weeks.

Second, can anyone imagine Biden being nominated at the Democratic National Convention? It's hard to picture because he'd have to give a speech and function off script a bit, and I don't think he can pull any of that off. (Not that a lot of lemmings seem to notice or care.)

What would happen if Biden weren't the nominee because the left found some way for him to bow out gracefully? In that case, his delegates would have to vote on an alternative candidate. If Biden had selected a running mate, that person would be in a strong position to become the nominee.

If Biden does become the nominee, but something happens to him before Election Day that makes it impossible for him to remain the candidate, what happens then?

The party would pick another nominee, and it would most likely be the person who was his running mate.

If Biden makes it all the way to Election Day and wins (please hang in there with me because this could happen for a number of reasons, not the least of which is voter fraud and/or an electorate riddled with imbeciles), we know he won't be in charge. Instead, leftists with evil on their minds will be running the country. And to be a bit more specific, by "leftists with evil on their minds," I mean Marxists intent on destroying our country from within (already in progress) and establishing a communist state.

And that would be that. America would be no more.

That brings me to this.

People who aren't working to help get Trump re-elected are not doing their part. (Working on down-ticket races is also crucial.) Don't be complicit. It's not enough to vote. Not nearly enough. Every single patriot must be donating money and volunteering, whether to be boots on the ground or making calls from home.

And please don't speak with over-confidence about 2016 or how the current polls are all wrong, nor feel hopeless and cynical about how the left is planning to steal the election. It doesn't matter what we feel, but what we know. And we know that President Trump needs the largest army possible between now and Election Day to maximize his chance of winning.

None of us can afford to find a reason to do less, rather than more.

It's all on the line. We need all hands on deck.

Everything we value and hold dear is at stake.

The left will flood the country with immigrants who will vote for it, open the doors to "refugees" who will join the destruction from within, add seats to the Supreme Court to ensure far-left rulings, eliminate the Senate filibuster, abolish the Electoral College, make D.C. the 51st state, and transform this nation into a large scale version of Venezuela as they solidify their power.

Yes, it can happen. And we are on the brink of it.

This is it. It's now or never, folks. Come Election Day, let none of us feel we didn't do everything in our power, and then some, to defend this nation lest it be completely destroyed.

Roosh #sexist rooshv.com

The biggest travesty that has happened to women in the past 70 years is not misogyny or sexism, but being put on the same education and work timeline as men in spite of having a completely different biology. Millions of women suffer every day because they’re living lives that were designed and optimized for men.

Most women lose the ability to have children without medical intervention at the age of 40. After that, it gets extremely hard for a woman to naturally conceive, and even if she manages to do so, she is 17 times more likely to transmit birth defects to her child than having conceived at age 20. Even at 35, a woman already sees a huge drop in her fertility.

...

The culture infects young girls with an obsession on career so that they attend an expensive university and rush to work immediately after graduation, all with the grand design of enslaving them into the rat race during the most fertile period of their lives, sharply reducing the number of children they can have. If a girl is lucky, she may have twenty fertile years starting at age 18, but during that time she’s expected to get a degree, move out of her parent’s home into a “vibrant” big city, establish a career where her skills remain in high demand, fall in love with a man who makes more money than she does, marry him, feel financially secure enough to have a family, and then have her first child. Does this at all sound reasonable to you when her male counterpart has double the time she has? My father had his last child in his 50’s. Can a woman do that?

Let’s assume for a minute that I won’t advocate for traditionalism or make the argument that a woman shouldn’t be able to make life decisions on her own, as I have before. What kind of solution remains that would allow women to pretend to be businessmen while still being able to have children before it gets too late? It is to get married and have children before attending university. If a woman does that, she merely has to wait until her last child enters kindergarten to enroll in whichever brainwashing factory she wants, graduate within four years through mostly day-time study, and then begin working while her children are being brainwashed themselves in public schools.

If we assume that a woman who got married early had her last child at a still pert 26, that means she’d be ready for university at 31 and enter corporate hell at 35. Based on current life expectancy figures, that gives her six more decades to decorate her cubicle and LARP as a businessman.

...

Right now a woman may be thinking, “But men get a head start in your plan, that’s not fair!” Yeah, well, you’ll live longer than me, which is not fair either. My solution allows women to take advantage of their biology and have children when their body is most ready for it. All that’s required is obtaining the love and commitment of a man who is asked to impregnate a young woman who is family oriented and not a whore. That will not be difficult. In fact, if you fit this profile, you can contact me with a full body photo and I may wife you up, but please don’t wait until you’ve sampled numerous penises because then your brain chemistry will have degraded to such an extent that you will sabotage any future relationship that has genuine love from a man who wants to provide for you.

I’m sure you can find a dozen other logistical problems to my plan, especially concerning the economics of having one wage-earner support a family for at least five years, but I assume that the wife will know how to cook, grow basic foods in a garden, sew, and not want to display expensive possessions to internet nobodies on Instagram. The major hurdle is not finding a man willing to wife up a supple young bride, but finding a girl with half her brain still intact after her parents threw her into the mud pit of blue-haired feminist pigs.

If you are a young woman in high school, I advise you to skip out on university, live with your parents, work a basic part-time job to earn money for tasteful makeup and clothing, learn important homemaking skills, and then use the remainder of your free time to securing the love of a man who wants a family. Assuming your standards in men are realistic (hah!), it won’t take you more than a year to find a worthy contender, because what man wouldn’t want to lay down roots with such a family-oriented woman?

...

As a man who has spent only six years working in a corporate career, one that was actually somewhat interesting, I can guarantee that any job a woman takes will cause more damage to her happiness than not. Women should look at all the men who are quitting the rat race to become location independent and ask themselves why they are being convinced to participate in a rigged game that increasing numbers of intelligent men want nothing to do with. Ladies: you’re not missing out on delaying your career for a few years. It’s better to focus first on creating a family first, while you still can.

Rampant Fox #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

I Still Think Trump is Using Time Travel or Looking Glass

Future proves past.

How did he know about the Bangladeshi bomber?

How did he know about the terrorist attack that was planned for St. Petersburg and notify Putin ahead of time?

Same with the attempted assassination attempt on Theresa May?

Why do I think so? Because I knew it would take someone with this ability to defeat the cabal.

Donald Trump has direct a connection, by way of his uncle John D. Trump, to Nicola Tesla. Tesla was working on time travel. (can't post the link but easily found) John Trump, was given Tesla's papers after Tesla's passing.

Finally, the Trump/Tesla/Bush connection

George Scherff, George Bush's father, was Tesla's accountant and George HW would rifle through Tesla's papers, which Tesla found highly annoying, dubbing little George, "Curious George" and later this moniker became the title of the famous children's book. The author of this book died through suspicious causes right before it was published.

However, as I was searching for the source (easily found,) I stumbled across this:

Raytheon Patents Bush & Trump

The documents were released, via FOIA, in April, 2016. (you will have to search under the title above, as none of the links I've tried putting in will post.) P.S. It's a Death Ray.

Finally, I have had the theory that Trump was a time traveller tucked in the corner of my mind ever since he put his hat in the ring for President. I remember the Titor posts. It was an amusing theory, but I didn't really believe it until I started watching Trump with the question of what if? in mind. Everything he did, even when he said "You'd be in jail," to Hillary during the debate, was perfectly timed. Everything he said was proven right, even when the press tried to mock it. He never makes a fatal misstep. It can't be genius alone. Although I do think he's a genius.

Anyway, I just wanted to get that out.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

Do leftoids and their antifa schlock troops have any self-awareness at all? Because if they did, they’d recoil at what their “progressive” movement has become: a bought and paid for tool of the Deep State. Their “Fight the Man!” ilk used to revolt against the Establishment before it became a moral imperative to support Davosian globalist oligarchs and neocon warmongers.

Case in point: the resignation of national security advisor Mike Flynn from Trump’s Cabinet. I won’t get into the thickets here concerning the events leading up to Flynn’s departure (it isn’t nearly as scandalous as the FakeNews media would have you to believe), but suffice to say the Left is very happy that their new Master, the invade-the-world, invite-the-world Deep State, has claimed a Trump Administration scalp.

...

I agree with both anonymous and Jack D. Trump’s “cave” (perceptions matter when you aren’t controlling the leftoid media megaphone) will make his Presidency more difficult. You give a shitlib an inch, they’ll take a mile. That is the nature of r-selected critters.

But Jack D is also right that Trump genuinely admires Pence and probably felt he had to do him a solid on this issue, if it’s true that Flynn dissembled to Pence and jeopardized Pence’s integrity, (even if the matter on which Flynn dissembled is in the grand scheme the smallest of potatoes). I think Trump may come out ahead in the long run if Flynn’s resignation establishes an anti-Deep State precedent that Trump will tolerate no lying in his Cabinet, and firings are a real threat for anti-Trump subversives.

But the moral of the story is the Left’s total and complete alignment with the GloboHomo Axis of Weasel’s project to deracinate Western nations and replace them with chaotic, socially disemboweled market bazaars selling cheap Chinese-made trinkets and zika-laced tacos.

The leftoid equalist rebels will gladly subsume their directives to the Deep State if it means a continuation of open borders and the rest of the anti-White globalist agenda. It always comes back to anti-White posturing. Always. Shitlibs will rationalize any putrid alliance as long as their precious anti-White “social justice” isn’t hindered.

The real revolutionaries now are on the Maul-Right; we fight a crooked Establishment that includes, but is not limited to, the media, the government bureaucracy, the Deep State, the Democrats, the Republicans, academia, the judiciary, the entertainment propaganda machine, the Left, the Russophobic neocons, the Mexican squatters, the cucked Anglosphere, the Soros saboteurs, the SJW social media censors, and the street theater antifa perception manipulators and demoralization agents.

We are David versus the Goliath Left. If only the Left had the decency to recognize which side of that battle they represent.

Jair Bolsonaro #fundie yahoo.com

Rio de Janeiro (AFP) - Right-wing ex-army captain and presidential front-runner Jair Bolsonaro is a controversial figure in Brazil, not least for a series of comments about torture, rape, homosexuals and women.

Ahead of the October 7 election first round, AFP takes a look at some of 63-year-old's most eye-catching comments.

- Torture -

-- "The dictatorship's mistake was to torture but not kill." -- Interview with Jovem Pan radio station, June 2016.

- "During the dictatorship, they should have shot 30,000 corrupt people, starting with the (then) President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, which would have been a great gain for the nation." -- Guotes carried by TV Bandeirantes, May 1999.

-- "For the memory of colonel Carlos Alberto Brilhante Ustra, the terror of Rousseff... my vote is yes!" -- After voting in favor of impeaching then-president Dilma Rousseff, a former guerrilla who was tortured under the military dictatorship, Bolsonaro dedicated his vote to retired colonel Ustra, the former head of the military dictatorship's intelligence services accused of having killed at least six people under torture.

- Killing -

-- "We're going to shoot the PT supporters in Acre." -- During a Workers' Party (PT) electoral meeting in the western state on September 1. His communications department subsequently said: "it was a joke, as always."

- Religion -

-- "God above all. This history of a secular state doesn't exist, no. The state is Christian and those who are against it can leave. The minority must bow to the majority." -- A meeting in Paraiba, February 2017.

- Race -

-- "I went to a quilombola (a settlement of African slave descendants) in Eldorado Paulista. The lightest Afro-descendent weighed seven arrobas (around 80 kilograms, 225 pounds). They don't do anything. They're no use even to procreate." -- During a conference at Rio de Janeiro's Hebrew Club following a visit to a quilombola.

-- "Preta, I'm not going to talk about promiscuity with anyone. I won't run that risk, because my sons were brought up very well and they haven't lived in environments such as is, unfortunately, yours." -- When singer and presenter Preta Gil, the daughter of renowned musician Gilberto Gil, asked him on TV Bandeirantes in March 2011 how he would react if one of his sons fell in love with a black woman. Later, Bolsonaro said he'd misheard the question and thought it referred to a possible homosexual relationship.

- Women -

-- "It saddens me to see the entrepreneurial world in Brazil, because it's a misfortune to be a boss in our country, with so many labor laws. Between a man and a young woman, what will the entrepreneur think? 'Damn, this woman's got a ring on her finger, she'll be pregnant soon, she'll be on maternity leave for six months...' Who's going to pay the bill? The employer. In the end it's deducted from social security but the work rhythm is broken. And when she returns, she'll take a month-long vacation. In the end, she works five months in one year." -- Interview with Zero Hora newspaper, December 2014.

- Rape -

-- "She doesn't deserve to be raped because she's very ugly. She's not my type, I'd never rape her. I'm not a rapist, but if I was, I wouldn't rape her because she doesn't deserve it." -- Bolsonaro speaking to Zero Hora in December 2014, explaining why he previously told leftist deputy, Maria do Rosario: "I wouldn't rape you, you don't deserve it."

- Homosexuals -

-- "I wouldn't be able to love a gay son. I wouldn't be a hypocrite, I'd prefer a son to die in an accident than appear with a moustacho." -- Interview with Playboy magazine, June 2011

William Schnoebelen #fundie chick.com

Defending the Game

The arguments I get from those defending D&D (Christians or otherwise) are similar to those from people defending their favorite cult (Mormons, Masons, etc.). That, in itself, is interesting. These would include:

The author (me) is an idiot who knows nothing about the occult or D&D. This is the most common defense and the laziest. It is the old ad hominem argument.
D&D materials do not really say the things which the older article says they say.
It is only a game. It is not real.
There is no danger in playing D&D because its rituals are NOT based on real magic.
The suicide/homicide/mental illness issues are grossly overplayed and part of a hysteria, which swept through evangelical Christianity in the 1980's. This last is based primarily on an article by a Jeff Freeman27.
The STRAIGHT TALK is old and out of date.
When we (the emailer and friends) play D&D, we do not do those nasty things.
The game offers positive skill development.

Examining the Issues

Two of these can be dismissed quickly. The first is obviously a personal attack, which is baseless. My occult credentials are well established and my IQ is comfortably above idiocy.

I have played D&D a few times and spent dozens of hours talking with players and Dungeon Masters (DMs). Admittedly, my first hand experienced with D&D is from the 1970's-80's, but I would think it still counts for something. Has the game changed that much?

As to the age of the article, yes - that is why this article now exists. But most of the spiritual material in the article is as valid and relevant today as it was in 1989. Some of the material in the article may need revisiting, and that is the purpose of this article.

Whether or not the D&D materials still say what they said in the mid eighties is a project beyond the scope of this Straight Talk. I covet your prayers that the Lord would give me the time and funds to thoroughly research the contemporary FRPG scene, which if anything appears to be more appalling than it was 20 years ago. A walk through any gaming store can prove that. For example, there is now a whole line of materials based on the hellish H.P. Lovecraft Cthulhu mythos, a form of magic that we practiced in the darkest days of our satanic career - a system of magic prominently featured in THE SATANIC RITUALS by Anton LaVey!28 Contrary to the ramblings of D&D defenders like Michael Stackpole,29 the Necronomicon and the Cthulhu mythos are quite real. We will talk more about Mr. Stackpole later.

State of the Nation #conspiracy stateofthenation2012.com

The Internet is now overwhelmed by misinformation, disinformation and false information about the Washington, D.C. scandal known primarily as Pizzagate.

This alarming report has been prepared to provide both the global context and additional perspective for concerned people throughout the entire planetary civilization. Pedogate is going on practically everywhere.

For newcomers to this subject material, it is especially urgent to read this entire “Special Report” so that the Pizzagate lexicon and Pedogate back story can be properly understood. We also highly recommend the following excellent ebook: PIZZAGATE FOR DUMMIES for those who are unfamiliar with the Pizzagate back story.

Pedogate is Global, Pizzagate is Local

Many have complained that Pizzagate should be called Pedogate.

In fact, Pizzagate is just one of many Pedogates occurring around the world at this very moment. As the title indicates, “Pizzagate Represents Only a Single American Franchise Within a Worldwide Child Trafficking Operation Known As Pedogate“.

It’s true that Pizzagate is a uniquely American franchise that operates primarily in Washington, D.C., but also includes operations in New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles and other major metropolitan areas.

There are many other Pedogates, which have nothing to do with Pizzagate, taking place all over America at this time. Are these related? Yes, some much more than others.

For instance, the ongoing Hollywood Pedogate is joined at the hip with the D.C. Pizzagate. The very reason that many Hollywooders came out of the woodwork to support Hillary R. Clinton and bash Donald J. Trump is because of this close association of decade-long child abuse scandals in both D.C. and Tinseltown.

The most critical point here is that Pizzagate is the lynchpin that is inextricably connected to all the other Pedogates. Because it represents the child exploitation operation in the nation’s capital and related power centers, its outing has the capacity to expose the whole bloody child abuse culture. Yes, Pizzagate is that prominently configured within the world-wide Pedogate scandal. It’s not the grand-daddy like the Brussels Pedogate, but it involves a Who’s Who of American society and especially the political class.

Pizzagate is much more serious than previous Pedogates

Why did Pizzagate blow wide open…just before the election?

First, it’s important to understand that Pizzagate was revealed by the double whammy of the Podesta WikiLeaks and Anthony Weiner’s 650,000 emails. In other words, the time had come for this pedophilia in high places to be blown wide open. Because it all went down just a couple of weeks before the most contentious election in U.S. history, the whole world was watching the American political theater with utter amazement.

This is the timing and environment in which Pizzagate was first disclosed. Since the very first disclosures, it has gathered momentum that just won’t quit. In fact with each day comes new information and startling realizations about just how BIG this thing really is. That Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and John Podesta are at the epicenter of this “Scandal of the Millennium” makes it all the more shocking and hard for many to believe.

Nevertheless, it is these and other dramatic elements that have pushed Pizzagate to the forefront of the news cycle. Especially when the NYT, WashPo and BBC are running front page stories to defend an extremely dubious gay pizza parlor owner, the reader knows that there is something not right. And when FOX News’ Megyn Kelly is featuring an interview with Comet’s notorious James Alefantis that not only exonerates him from all suspicion, but lauds him as a hero of sorts who stared down the Alt Right, something is very wrong indeed.

It’s actually the real back story that is being kept carefully hidden; for were the true details of Pizzagate to leak out to the public, the world would change in a day and a night. The shocking back story of the much larger Pedogate looks like this. Take a very close look at the following excerpt. This short synopsis of the 1980s Franklin Scandal and Cover-up captures the sheer depth and breadth of the crimes being perpetrated against our children.

What the reader needs to understand is that Pizzagate represents only the tip of the iceberg—a global iceberg of profound criminality committed against the children of the world. Not only does it concern a much larger worldwide pedophilia ring known as Pedogate, it also involves an international crime syndicate that trades in the exploitation of children—EVERYWHERE —24/7.

Washington D.C. and the C.I.A.

What makes Pizzagate so very explosive is that all of the key players are deep in D.C. politics and Washington power-plays, US government influence peddling and federal power-brokering. And then there is the C.I.A., often regarded as the intelligence agency that not only controls the many Pedogates occurring nationwide, but also closely monitors each and every one of them. After all, these unimaginable child abuse operations are implemented — first and foremost — as the primary control mechanism that keeps American politicians in complete check.

Why is that so very important?

For the uninitiated, it is crucial to understand that the United States of America has been painstakingly cultivated to function as the military arm of the New World Order (NWO). In this pivotal role the USA takes direction from the financial arm headquartered in the City of London as well as from the religious arm of the NWO located in Vatican. This is why it’s so important for the World Shadow Government to control everything that goes on in Washington, D.C. the high command of the U.S. Armed Forces and military policeman of the world.

Pizzagate has simply uncovered what everyone in Washington has always known. That virtually every politician of note is controlled by having been compromised with an illegal and/or outrageous sexual affair, often with underage children. In once Puritan America this has always been the easiest way to bring down a noncompliant elected official. Of course, if the unlawful and lurid conduct occurred in the context of child rape or satanic ritual sacrifice, their political career not only ended, so was their freedom of movement due to imprisonment.

The C.I.A. has always been notorious for being deeply involved in the top 3 illicit revenue-producing operations of the world. Drug trafficking and arms trafficking are both quite HUGE; however, it is child trafficking that really keeps them in business. The CIA has so many black budgeted operations to fund that they require massive funding from these criminal activities to continue to run them across the planet. Child trafficking also provides a special means to control those in positions of perceived power. However, it is those who occupy the highest echelons of the global power structure who are also taken care of by way of this global pedophilia ring.

This is what really distinguished Pizzagate from all of the other child sexual abuse scandals in high places over the past many decades. It has broken open a prominently configured C.I.A. cell of deeply embed operatives within the international child exploitation business. This particular Pedogate operation is really controlled by the C.I.A., as well as other alphabet soup agencies that no one has even heard of they’re so secret and nefarious in their criminal activity.

What could possibly be more radioactive than pedophilia in high places?

Actually, the pedophilia rings are organized ostensibly as a cover for a much, MUCH more sinister business operation. Those criminal activities routinely carried out include the production of child pornography, both photographs and films, as well as the filming of snuff movies. Other criminal behavior falls within the realm of satanic ritual child sacrifice and blood drinking. The most odious crimes, however, involve child organ trafficking, tissues harvesting and blood extraction.

It’s crucial to comprehend that the C.I.A. does not, and never has, worked for the American people. The Company, as it is also known, works exclusively for the Military Industrial Complex and other key Fortune 1000 companies scattered around the globe. The C.I.A. is also employed by select NGOs, which have actually been set up as CIA front companies like the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Global Initiative is just that—a global CIA operation that interpenetrates every kind of corporation that is necessary to perform a blackop wherever it is necessary to have such a benevolent cover.

The Clinton Foundation: A Typical ‘CIA-Directed NGO’ That Is Completely Above The Law

For these and other reasons, both Hillary and Bill Clinton have been implicated in various schemes which have to do with child trafficking. The Pizzagate scandal at Comet Ping Pong is just one that was overseen by Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta–a key figure in the D.C. pedophilia ring along with his brother super-lobbyist Tony Podesta.

The very endeavor that put the Clinton Foundation on the map was its response to the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti. However, a woman who was caught and convicted of child smuggling (33 children) — Laura Silsby — and who Secretary of State Clinton tried to protect from prosecution, also has ties to the Foundation. Which is why the mainstream media (MSM) was eerily silent on this whole criminal matter.

some TERFs #sexist reddit.com

Re: On how the only aspects of "womanhood" that are valued are the ones males can buy into

image

(lacubana)
Yesssss thissssss

Wanna know when I felt most “like a woman”? I can tell you I sure wasn’t wearing makeup or heels or having a pillow fight. I wasn’t delicate in the slightest.

It was when I was pushing another human I had made out of my body. Oh yeah that.

(earthgarden)
and if you're not pushing a human out, or in the process of growing a human, you get a monthly reminder by your body (for at least 4 f!cking decades of your life!) that it had to tear down the nest it built just in case you set one to growing. I swear to god!! If men could experience a period ONCE they would leave us TF alone! That would be an end to the oppression because their pity would know no bounds, they'd experience massive shame at the treatment men have inflicted upon female humanity these long millennia. because then they'd realize nature already oppresses us just fine, thank you very much

(LadyCeer)
My dad used to be really sweet about it and let me sleep a lot and he fed me eggs and ibuprofen and was just very kind when I was being shot down by my period. He also used to talk to women in the form of long, friendly, non-sexual conversations....But then, he never tried to become a woman. Maybe that's a connection.

(shortstroll)
I don't know about your theory but I think it's one of two options.

The first is that some of them are just gay men who in their formative years internalised gender roles. So since they like clothes, have a crush on a dude and their penis isnt a major erogenous zones they think they are girls. It's also sub conscious sexual strategy. There's a greater selection of partners for them if they can fake being a woman. In fact you now see them pushing the idea that genuine heterosexual males would knowingly copulate with a tim.

The second is that some of them are straight men who just have a weird fetishism of womanhood. They don't just want to have sex with women, they want to be them. This isn't dissimilar from the cannibals who get sexual gratification from eating their sexual partners. Bruce Jenner is the perfect example of this. He slowly turned himself into a male version of his wife and the closer he got to his goal the greater his resentment of her grew. Once he had completed his transition, he didn't just discard her, he tried to destroy her in the media. I'm convinced that in a different world, he would have murdered her. That would have been his version of a perfect conclusion.

(TerribleConfusion)
I saw Graham Linehan retweeted a man suggesting something similar. It’s hard to empathise with this, as a woman, but it seemed to make sense to him and the other guy. And I suppose when you think about it, a lot of men do get INCREDIBLY uncomfortable when discussing ways in which men oppress women. Even decent guys don’t want to think about it. So I can kind of imagine how that discomfort might feed in to autogynephilia. Maybe when you feel like your desire is oppressive you want to be the object of desire instead of the subject.

It’s very hard to reconcile this with how misogynistic many TIMs are, though. But I suppose maybe they feel like they’re allowed to hate and bully women because they’re “women” too, and they’re more special and oppressed than any other kind of woman blah blah etc. And maybe it’s the most misogynistic and shitty of men who are most uncomfortable with themselves deep down so they transition to escape their own shittiness. Spoiler: they don’t escape it, they just found a different method than other misogynists to project their shittiness on to (actual) women.

(witchy_xx)
actually this is the exact reason given when my ex came out as trans. he wanted to escape the role of oppressor. what a load of shit.

it's also an easy power grab. for example that asshat Hailey Heartless was a no one politically before and now everyone knows his name.

(griffxx)
We have seen TIMs along with their Handmaidens, trying to dislocate all things female, from the definition of of woman, womanhood and female. I'm truly fascinated, in a psychologically clinical way, the TIMs asserting that they have Bloodless Periods. This a whole other level of Delusion.

Why on Earth did these Feminized White Men, think they could dictate WOMEN diminished our Womanhood, for their OBSESSIVE NARCISSISTIC NEED FOR THE VALIDATION OF THEIR GENDER IDENTITIES!!!!!

The minute these Prostate Havers and their Handmaidens said point blank that, "FEMALE BIOLOGY AND THE EXPERIENCES OF LIVING IN THE BODY, HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WOMANHOOD" this Misogynistic, Homophobic and Racist Movement should have been REELED/REALED in to what it was supposed to be:

Lobbying and advocating for laws that reassert Civil Rights protections against various forms of discrimination.

They have framed as "A FIGHT FOR THEIR EXISTENCE" this is categorically A LIE.

And to make the claim there are plenty of Lesbians that will date and fuck them; Bisexual leaning women more like. If this were true the Cotton Ceiling War Against Lesbian Sexuality would have ended 5 years ago. Instead it's still continues, and we are at 7.5 year mark.

We need to build on the momentum, we currently have. We need to explain to the Civilian class of women--> not part of the Feminist or LGBTQ Communities, how White TIMs are engaged in the process of erasing their sex-based protections, in the name of attaining their Civil Rights

(scienceisarealthing)

I have no way of knowing whether most pass or not. I’ve never seen a study. All I have is anecdotal evidence.

I've seen a lot of trans-identified males in real life as well as in photo & it's very rare for them to pass. The few who do pass visually are clockable as male as soon as you hear their voice, see their body shape, or see how large their bone structure is when they are next to a female person. This is not meant as an "insult" btw, bc there's nothing wrong with being a feminine male (as long as they arent sexist, etc...)

Transmisogyny is intrinsically illogical bc either the trans-ID'd male passes as female (and experiences some forms of misogyny) or he is clocked as male & faces homophobia/ transphobia/ whatever you wanna call hatred/ disgust against gnc males. It's the reason why drunk guys will sometimes hit on a trans-ID'd male, then the moment they find out he's actually male will scream things like "Fggot! Trnny!!" and sometimes resort to physical violence. That is NOT an example of misogyny bc it wouldn't happen to a female.

How would you know you saw a trans person if they did pass though?

I've never seen a trans-ID'd male who passes in real life, only in photos. There's just no getting around the differences in bone structure, voice, and movements between males and females when you observe people in real life. As someone who is involved in the natural sciences & figure drawing, it is easy to determine someone's natal sex & tell if they are trans or not.

edit: I mean, even when you look at the transpassing sub, few pass even in photo. It does a disservice to trans people to lie to them by telling them they pass when they don't. I see women and other trans people do this all the time & it makes me cringe, because it's so obviously.. not true. In fact, it comes across as cruel to lie to someone like that. It should be ok for people to look/ dress however they want without striving for the unattainable goal of passing completely as the opposite sex.

If a trans woman passes as female, what forms of misogyny would they not face? Honest question. Is it just from medical professionals who would know about someone’s private health details? If they pass, then why would it come up in conversation?

Side question, why does it matter if someone is facing violence due to misogyny or transphobia? Why put up one more barrier between people who have similar experiences under the same system?

It is impossible to say definitively whether or not most trans women can pass based on one person’s interaction with the public. You can definitely say that you’ve seen some trans people not passing. Why would anyone reveal their medical history to a stranger?

Jesus christ, seriously? They wouldn't face:

-limited birth control access, abortion access, reproductive rights battles

-the pain of pregnancy/ discrimination against pregnant women

-dying in childbirth

-the fear of becoming pregnant

-menstrual pain/ stigma/ menstrual huts

-female genital mutilation

-femicide/ sex selective abortion

-medical stigma against female health concerns like PCOS, uterine cysts, endometriosis, severe PMS, menopause, etc... (the list goes on & on)

-sex trafficking & rape (most men want to rape females, not trans-ID'd males)

-being sold as a child bride

-limited access to education bc of being female

-breast ironing

-bride burning

-foot binding (though this only happened to females in the past, as far as i know)

I'm leaving off so much more I can't think of right now. Trans men, nonbinary females, women.. we all face these issues based on what part of the world we live in. It matters whether someone faces misogyny vs. homophobia/ transphobia because those are different forms of oppression! By your same logic, we could include men who face racism under the branch of feminism because (as you said) "Why put up one more barrier between people who have similar experiences?"

FEMinism is the only political movement that is exclusively for FEMales. It's horrible that other people face different forms of oppression, but they can form their own movements to address their needs. Black women & black men both face racism but ONLY black women are welcome in feminism. Poor men & poor women are both economically oppressed, but ONLY the poor woman is welcome in feminism. A woman & a passing trans-ID'd male may both be catcalled, but ONLY the woman is welcome in feminism.

Trans-ID'd males are welcome to (and in fact, already have) formed their own political movements against the unique problems they face. It is narcissistic and unreasonable to demand that women dismantle the ONLY political movement that we have to ourselves. Can female people seriously have nothing to ourselves?Do we have to give in to every group who wants "in"? We can be allies with each other to overcome some similar problems we may face (if any), but we are not the same, and that distinction in lived reality matters.

Isn’t feminism for anyone who believes in the social, economic, and political equality of women? Everyone is welcome. That is a great point about not including everyone who is oppressed ever, but the type of oppression we are talking about is targeted at people who present as female. What I find disturbing by your response is that you aren’t inclusive. Why do you need to say that someone is not welcome if they are experiencing something as common as cat calling or workplace harassment? Would it be so bad if a trans woman was in your circle? Would you not feel safe? I don’t understand what benefit there is to being so specific in membership? It seems to me that it would be best to differentiate by who is suffering a type of discrimination. For example, a trans woman might be subject to being talked down to in public (there is a great TEDtalk by a trans woman who knows what it is like to walk around in society as an adult male and an adult female. She passes btw). A trans male might have not had access to birth control prior to transitioning. I would think both types of people would be welcome.

Feminism is Liberation of females from male oppression. We are already equal, stating that is redundant and offensive.

Aunty Semite #racist realjewnews.com

Even after Trump caved in to the Zionist Jews, fired Steve Bannon, announced more mideast war and attacking Afghanistan again, the Jews media is still terrorizing Trump.

Even though Trump has been beaten into submission and exhibits the “yawsa boss manners” that his Zionist puppet masters demand and now does whatever they tell him, the Jews are still cutting him down at every turn.

The Jews are destroying Trump for something more than just because Trump is a Repub. If being a Repub was a death penalty offense by itself, then Insane McCain and Lesbie Gayham would be destroyed by the Jews instead of praised and glorified by the Jews media.

The real reason the Jewish Supremacists want to destroy Trump seems to be that they view him as a white Christian. The Zionists hate Christians of any color, but their hate of white Christians is more devilish.

Besides hating Trump because they see him as a despised white Christian, the Zionists are overthrowing other white Christian governments.

For many years now the Zionists have used the US military and the armies of other white Christian nations to overthrow governments such as Egypt, Libya, Iraq, the Balkan nations, and so on.

Now the Jews are inciting their riots and overthrow operations in the US, Europe, and the white Christian nations that were previously used to overthrow governments of weaker nations. The overthrow operations have gone global.

The chaos, riots, and wars appear to be fulfillment of plans in the Protocols of Zion to subordinate existing governments under a global government such as the UN or whatever name the Jews will call it.

globalball #fundie reddit.com

(On why incels should hate women)

because they try to make us believe that they're not truly as evil as their nature, their lies can cause real harm to the most naive

[Just for clarification purposes, you're saying that women are evil by nature here?]

well arent they in your opinion?

[No. Sure, some are, but so are some men. Most people are just trying to live their lives, they're not out to get you.]

honesty and loyalty is something most women never heard of, because they act according to their emotions exclusively which makes them mediocre "rational" beings overall.

"they're not out to get you" you say? tell that to the hundreds of thousands of male victims of child support or alimony, tell that to the victims of false rape accusations, tell em to their faces and see how they react. you can only benefit from keeping a distance between yourself and women, they are little big trouble makers

[That's an awfully big blanket statement you're tossing out there. I can tell you my girlfriend very rarely acts according to her emotions exclusively. Sometimes it happens, but I've seen plenty of males react based on their emotions as well.

And you can very easily flip the coin and see all the women who don't see any child support and yet still have to raise a child. My former boss as an example, she doesn't get child support from the father of her first child, and even when she was with the father of her second child, he wouldn't pay for anything, not even rent when he was living with her.

And by the numbers, false rape accusations doesn't hold up to actual rape numbers, and it's a bit of a stretch to say being accused of rape is actually worse than being raped.

This mindset is exactly why this sub gets the criticism that it does. You treat women as if they're sub-human, and that's sad.]

what rape really is: oh noo i was forced to "sleep" with someone who i consider ugly for 30 minutes, now i wont be able to live anymore hurr durr

victim of false rape accusation: possibility of imprisonment and being marked as an offender which cripples your career path and makes you disgusting to everyone around until the last of your days

boo fucking hoo

BoyWiki #pedo #psycho boywiki.org

Recent discourse on child pornography falsely portrays it, like child sex in general, as a disaster for the child. Children are (supposedly) "traumatized" because they cannot consent, and their parents cannot consent for them. Thus all child-adult sexual contact is called rape (actually, it is statutory rape which usually involves no real physical violence at all), and the child pornography is considered documentation "crime" and more or less permanently remains available on the Internet for all to see.

Unfortunately, there are small numbers of people who really do abuse children, and who even violenly rape them, without the child's consent or that of their parents. These are, and should be crimes, of course.

Yet there are many children seen in child pornography whose words, facial expressions, body language, and orgasms show that they thoroughly enjoy the sexual activity, sometimes enjoying it immensely. Why causing another human being intense enjoyment and pleasure, without any complaint from the alleged victim or his/her parents, is necessarily a crime is one of the contradictions of our sex-conflicted age.

Ghost #conspiracy ghost.report

QAnon Followers Are No Better Than Low IQ Leftists

image

It’s been a month since the Capitalist Army DOXED QAnon. But since then, QAnon has all of a sudden become “mainstream.” The whole reason we DOXED QAnon was to prevent the mainstream media from making the Right-Wing look like morons. My argument was; if we on the Right accept this QAnon troll, then we are NO BETTER than the lunatic Left.

It didn’t take long for the previous to become a reality. Ever since ignorant and gullible morons showed up in mass to a recent Florida Trump Rally with “QAnon” shirts, signs and other apparel, the mainstream media has had a field-day making the Right-Wing look like complete conspiracy buffoons. MSM is making the Right look like the same simpletons who blindly follow the “dunce from the Bronx” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Which is what we were trying to prevent by outing this Q-Anon ass clown.

But now that so many on the Right believe this troll, its time for those of us on the side of rational truth to shun these naïve, low “IQ” piles of protoplasm. Q-Anon followers have turned the tables, and have us looking like the “crazy side.” If one tries to explain to a Q-follower that this whole thing is a troll, with proof, evidence and facts, they are in complete denial. This is exactly what Leftist do!

Let’s say, the for the sake of argument, that Q-Anon is “real,” and that he’s military intelligence who “tapped” Trump to be POTUS and is giving Trump orders. Then this technically undermines Trump himself, making him look as if he is a puppet of “Q-Anon;” giving credence to the Leftist narrative that Trump “doesn’t know what he’s doing.” It also completely ignores the genuine sacrifices of Trump (life, family, wealth, etc.) to actually run for President. It also undermines genuine soldiers of TRUTH like Julian Assange, who ALWAYS released unaltered facts and information; unlike the linguistically ambiguous rhetoric of QAnon. Even Wikileaks calls QAnon a “Piped Piper” operation.

Its time for those of us who ACTUALLY aided (and put their Freedom at risk for obtaining and/or disseminated information) in the election of Donald Trump in 2016 to call out these simple-minded morons falling for this QAnon garbage. Q-Anon followers are more dangerous to the Right-Wing (politically) than ANY Leftist, for Q-followers are molding the rest of us into a category of crazy that is a HUGE turn-off to Mr. and Mrs. Joe Sixpack (you know, the regular voters).

And from my and the Capitalist Army’s investigations, we genuinely believe that Leftists are behind this QAnon troll. But you can talk and prove this till you’re blue in the face with these Q-followers, and they will still believe this troll no matter what. At this point, Q-followers are no different that the LGBTQ when attempting to legitimize the sexualization of children. Now that I think about it, why is Q-Anon (supposedly against pedophiles, pizzagate, etc.) posting on the notoriously pedophile friendly 8-chan? Really makes you think, huh?

Ghost

Donald Trump #racist nypost.com

Trump told Shinzo Abe he’d ship 25 million Mexicans to Japan

President Donald Trump stunned his fellow world leaders at the G7 meeting when he said he would ship “25 million” Mexicans to Japan, which would result in Prime Minister Shinzo Abe losing his next election.

During the gathering in Quebec — which ended with Trump leaving early and refusing to sign the traditional joint communique — the president was talking about what he called Europe’s immigration problem when he turned his attention to the Japanese leader.

“Shinzo, you don’t have this problem, but I can send you 25 million Mexicans and you’ll be out of office very soon,” Trump said, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing a senior EU official who was in the room.

The commander-in-chief also raised eyebrows when the subject turned to Iran and terrorism.

“You must know about this, Emmanuel, because all the terrorists are in Paris,” he told French President Emmanuel Macron.

“A sense of irritation with Mr. Trump could be felt, but everyone tried to be rational and calm,” the official told the paper.

Trump arrived late to the gathering, left early, and later attacked Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as “weak” after Trudeau said Canada would retaliate for tariffs on imported steel and aluminum imposed by the US.

While the president has insulted America’s longest allies, he had nothing but praise for brutal North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un after their brief sitdown later in the week, calling him “a very smart guy” and “a great negotiator.”

Accelerated Christian Education #fundie independent.co.uk

Teachers at Christian fundamentalist schools in Britain allegedly performed exorcisms on pupils, beat children in religious rituals and “groomed” girls for marriage, according to former students who say they have decided to speak out now after years of suffering in silence.

The former pupils told The Independent such treatment of children was a “terrifying” part of life at schools in the 1980s, 1990s and early 2000s in an environment where they felt too afraid to complain for fear of retribution from school staff, evangelical parents and their close-knit Baptist faith community.

One former pupil alleged that in the 1990s pupils at school assemblies would start convulsing amid “blood curdling screams” as prayers were said for the holy spirit to rid children of demons. The alleged abuse is said to have taken place many years ago at a number of schools in the UK that follow the Accelerated Christian Education (ACE) curriculum, a form of learning that originated in the southern Baptist states of the US.

The former pupils contacted The Independent after reading our June report revealing that some of these schools still teach children that girls must submit to men, homosexuality is unnatural and that creationism is a fact. They said the article jolted their memories of their own experiences.

More than 1,000 4-18 year olds are currently taught in 30 ACE schools in the UK, all of them registered as private institutions. Although the schools are bound by the same safeguarding and child protection regulations as the state sector, former pupils want assurances that monitoring of these schools is more effective than when they attended.

One told The Independent that during his time at an ACE school in the 1990s: “We were told that we were the children of God and the world was out to get us. So we were isolated and couldn’t speak out. There was nobody checking on us. I just took it.”

Pupils who have traditionally attended the schools tend to come from Christian families who follow a fundamentalist interpretation of the Bible. Former pupils said many of the children will have limited interaction with mainstream society.

One former pupil, who attended a school in the 1990s and who has asked not to be named, said: “Exorcisms used to happen at school assemblies sometimes. There would be 20 or so children and perhaps five adults. We were told that the holy spirit would come through children. I started convulsing and I couldn’t stop. Even when I went to bed I kept convulsing. I was terrified, I really thought it was the holy spirit.

“We would all begin convulsing. I remember them screaming blood curdling screams and then we’d all pray rigorously to get the demons out. Teachers would physically push us. They’d lay their hands on us when we prayed and they’d push us down. If you didn’t fall it was said that you weren’t really ‘feeling the Lord’. It was a very dark thing. It really was insanity. It got completely out of control.”

Two other former pupils from the 1990s and 2000s alleged they witnessed exorcisms performed on some occasions at other schools, where children were encouraged to “speak in tongues”.

Allegations from ex-pupils include other potential concerns. At some schools, girls were groomed for marriage from a young age, two former students said. They claimed the grooming was done by the church communities that run the schools and by teachers. Methods were said to include controlling girls’ sexuality and isolating them from boys their own age so they might later be married to much older male members of the church groups.

In some schools they were allegedly encouraged to marry soon after they turned 16, as church leaders told them it was “God’s will”.

One woman, who attended a school between the late 1990s and early 2000s, said: “There was one girl I knew who married someone more than 20 years older. The man she married had known her since she was seven years old and he was 30. She’d sit on his knee when she was a child. He’d played with her when she was a child. Now they’re married. It’s just really creepy.

“As a young girl, you were told you were not allowed to talk to boys your own age, you had to stand six inches apart from boys at all times at schools, teachers told you they’d hit you with a wooden paddle if you kiss a boy. So you didn’t get to meet anyone else and then you’re shown sexual interest for the first time and it’s some creepy old man. It was so sexualised, they were sexualising children.”

Another former pupil who attended an ACE school in the 1990s said a girl at her school had married a man at 16, when he was in his 40s, and who she had met when he began teaching at her school.

She said: “You were told from a young age that your role is to support a man and God will lead you to him. The role of women in these religious groups is quite clear. You’re told God has chosen a husband for you and God will lead this man to you. But in reality, pastors and church leaders guide men to you. It’s grooming.”

She added: “When I was 18, I experienced it. From the age of 14, the church had been pushing me towards a man in the church group who was eight years older. I was actively encouraged to work with him. They were very pushy about marriage, it was very intimidating. It’s very closed and isolating.

“As a girl, you’re left feeling redundant if you don’t get married. You’re told it’s God’s will and you’re just wasting time until you get married – it’s your ultimate goal.”

She said that none of the girls married before the legal age of consent, adding: “They are very keen to ensure nothing illegal happened, but the conditioning was around a long time before that.”

Although all the claims made by former pupils for this article relate to historic incidents, textbooks still used by the schools – and seen by The Independent – raise current concerns.

The books suggest pupils are still taught that “the wife is to obey, respect and submit to the leadership of her husband, serving as a helper to him” and “God desires for [women] to submit to husband.”

Other pupils told The Independent there were also historic concerns about corporal punishment, which they say took on a religious characteristic at the ACE schools.

They claimed children were beaten with a wooden paddle and then forced into a ritualised religious quasi-ceremony in which prayers were said for their salvation in the 1980s and 1990s. They said that the church groups believed at the time that corporal punishment was “God’s will” as it stopped children from sinning.

Corporal punishment was outlawed in UK private schools in 1998 and there is no suggestion the ACE schools breached that law.

David Waldock who attended an ACE school between the ages of 11 and 16 prior to 1998 said: “I was beaten with a cane by teachers while a pupil at an ACE school. The school was in the basement of the church. The cane was kept in the vestry. You would be led up to the vestry to a fold down desk, inside was a cardboard case and in that was the cane.

“The teachers explained to you your ‘offence’. You were told to take your trousers down. Then you were bent over a chair with your trousers down and wearing just your underwear. Then you were caned. And then you prayed for forgiveness.

“It was very ritualised. It was a ritual of confession, administration and prayer for forgiveness.”

One former pupil who attended an ACE school in the 1990s said a four-year-old boy at her school had special needs which caused him to urinate and defecate uncontrollably in class. She claims the child would be routinely taken to be beaten by the headmaster with a wooden paddle to punish this “bad behaviour”.

She says knowing corporal punishment was happening to other children was extremely distressing: “I remember feeling sick. I was so frightened I dug my nails into my hands.”

A 1993 copy of the ACE teachers’ training manual, seen by The Independent, appears to instruct teachers in how to administer corporal punishment when children have “sinned” in ritualised religious ceremonies. It says: “Demerits are for procedural violations; the paddle is for moral violations.”

The manual then lists a step by step process for hitting children.

“Using Bible verses, explain to the child the principles he has violated. Make sure he clearly understands what he has done wrong … position the child so he is leaning forward with his hands on a desk or chair and with his feet spread. Keep the paddle, switch, or belt low to avoid hitting the spine.

“Pray with the child following corporal correction. Review the offense and show him Hebrews 13.17. Request that he ask the Lord to forgive him for _____ (name the violation) and help him obey God’s Word and those people God has placed in his life to train him.”

An updated edition of the teacher training manual compiled after 1998 stops advocating corporal punishment by teachers at ACE schools. Christian Education Europe, an organisational body that runs and promotes ACE schools, say stocks of teaching manuals are regularly checked to ensure they are up to date.

A former pupil who attended an ACE school in the 1990s said: “The kind of people who send their children to schools like these believe in it absolutely. The pastor had absolute power and they could do anything.”

caamib #sexist blogger.com

"No is because you don’t actually feel sorry for these people. To things like you stories of horrific assaults are just wank material for you."

I do feel sorry for people who get unjustified sentences due to maniacs like you and I don't wank on stories of horrific assaults. In fact, even as late as 2013 I COULDN'T GET IT UP WHEN A WOMAN I COERCED INTO SEX WAS THRASHING BELOW ME WHEN I TRIED TO PUT IT IN HER, despite the fact that 1. she came to my home 2. we already arranged what prize she should be given 3. she even blew me to get me hard to finally put it her 4. we even joked around later that day. This changed drastically later but what you don't understand is that most "horrific assaults" done to women today is caused by feminism, which made decent men unable to get consensual sex. That's why they must resort to rape - because consensual sex in the West is basically impossible to get unless you're really, really evil. There's exceptions but they're extremely rare.


" Hell one of your pedophile friends on you Wordpress blog asked a women victim to detail her date rape"

And what is wrong about this? Unlike maniacs like you, I don't fetishize rape to be some greatest crime and trauma on Earth. Oh, wait, neither do you if the rapist isn't a white male, and you'd let your mothers and sisters be raped by classes you see as underprivileged. But let's get back to this. This woman was under no obligation to reply so what? Btw, you know who also asks this of women who claim to have been raped? Institutions like courts do. Another thing you'd like to do away with !

"I made sure to spread his profile around to people who are willing to contact him and tell him what he outta do."

Where? To my e-mail? Nobody is even sending me any hate mail these days. Everybody knows I just get a kick out of it.

"Because of people like you I have the job that I have, out of all the hundreds of kids I’ve seen only 36 were abused by “child molesters.” "

If that's true I'd fear for the safety of anybody working with or being around such an insane, hysterical person. Adults, children, whatever. You are the ones with skeletons in your closet, I am probably not talking metaphorically. Just look at your post.

" The rest were attacked by pedophiles, pedophiles who caused lasting physical and mental injuries. Injuries so horrific some adults don’t even recover let alone a 3-year old who is repeatedly raped."

This isn't what Eivind is talking about, but now that you mention it I'll be honest - I'm not sorry. Regardless if kids were male or female, not sorry. I hate 99,9 percent of modernist Westerners and want only the worse for them. If some get abused, traumatized or even killed I don't care, no matter what the age. They would or are to grow up as bad, bad people. You are a grown up Westerner and you're a bad person. And so will/would they be.


" Pedophiles who drove 15 of these kids to kill themselves, deaths that I personally witnessed..... I’ve witnessed countless other suicide attempts by crazed victims who want their nightmares to stop....t. She killed herself when she was 10 years old not too long after I walked into an old run down shed after hearing her screaming and crying and telling the two pedophiles raping her to stop. Because of your kind she’s dead. I held her while she died and I will not forget that. I was 15-years old when she died, I still have the clothes I was wearing when she bled out. Her blood is still soaked into them and some days I have to struggle to not break down sobbing at that memory."

Holy shit I laughed so hard at this. This story continues here and here

http://theliterarylink.com/gretel.html

http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/grimm053.html

Also, how does a 10 year-old kill herself so efficiently? Tell me more about it. Or those 15 suicides you've witnessed.

" Your kind is a blight that must be purged. If only Hitler had killed you all, if only he could’ve killed you all, if only he didn’t target Jews and Romanis."

So aside from being utterly psychotic you also lack basic knowledge of history and think 2017 world was just like 1937 world ? Had Hitler gone after pedophiles (not that me and Eivind are that) he'd kill no more than couple of hundred of people at best even including countries he conquered, at even that's probably an overstatement. He'd have to kill just convicted ones who were convicted due to actual crimes the kind of which you describe and there were really a few people like that in 1930s. It was notoriously hard to even track who is homosexual without special lists at the time and many of the names were people who were set up for some reason while some gays were protected as long as they were useful (Ernst Röhm being a prime example of this).

". I hope someone finds you and kills you and each and every one of your baby raping friends too. "

I have never raped a baby nor has any friend that I know of. I think same goes for Eivind... You, on the other hand...

"Your kind is one without remorse or sympathy, you’re incapable of understanding right from wrong or caring about the pain you cause others."

... support blacks, Muslims or any other group you think lacks privilege raping and killing even newborns because they're Sacred according to you and cannot be held accountable. I know this and you know this. I know it in the way you write phrases like "far-right" or how you mention Trump. At the same time you want white males to have no fair trials, no hearings, just off to prisons with them. So why don't you just admit what you're all about? Because, believe me, I know what you're all about. I know you. You cannot pull the veil over my eyes. I will never stop fighting you because I know what you are. Don't forget that.

"People like you destroy lives."

Good.

"What makes you think you deserve anything good in life?"

Nothing, given that I never said this. What makes you think white males will go along with your idea that they must be exterminated but Sacreds can do as they like? What makes you think modern Western women deserve not to be raped by them?


"’m not a religious man, religion is false. But if Hell is real I hope you burn there, I hope you suffer every imaginable horror and humiliation both known and unknown."

Funny, exactly something I think about you and your kind.

" The day is coming when we’ll be able to openly kill your kind again. I can’t wait for this to happen."

There was never a day when you could have killed "our kind", given that people like me and Eivind were a majority even 50 years ago in most places. Hell, I mentioned 14 year-old eight graders with fuck buddies around 12 years ago. Nobody had a problem with this. It was seen as normal. That you equate those like Eivind and me with people who rape babies while you actually support babies being raped, just by appropriate groups of people, is why you're such a laughingstock.

No, pal, the kind of people who it will be legal to kill again soon are your kind. Liberalism didn't appear for the first time in history and always ended up with slaughter of liberals, before or after they destroyed the society which nourished them. You will be exterminated by Muslims you so worship and people like me.

You are guilty of most vicious crime in the history of the world, and that is feminism. I know what it did to me and many of my friends. There will be no forgiveness.

bill-11b #fundie bill-11b.tumblr.com

[ What do you think of the official changing of Jackson's face on the 20 dollar bill to Harriet Tubman face. ]


It’s bullshit pandering, nothing more.

It disgusts me to see people on the right celebrating as if this is some civil rights glass ceiling we needed to break.

If they’re gonna replace anyone, it should be Lincoln, seeing as he was a tyrannical fuck head anyhow.

[ You’re saying that replacing someone responsible for the trail of tears and the Indian removal act with someone who actually did some good is bullshit pandering? ]

Indians
>On our land
>Why wouldn’t we remove them?

I’m so sick of hearing about the poor fucking Indians. Jesus Christ. Maybe if they’d evolved culturally past 400bce they’d still be here and we wouldn’t.

I think you’d be hard pressed to find another nation that’s conquered territory and then carved out spots for the conquered natives to remain autonomous.

Jackson was an American war hero and unlike Lincoln, he didn’t kill 600,000 Americans, and unlike Hamilton, he didn’t support centralized banking, which as we’ve seen has turned into a shit show and allowed the government to keep their boot on our necks financially.
And yes, a black woman, by this president, at this time in history, is absolutely pandering.


[ Cool. So if you conquer a place you have a right to treat the populace however you want? That’s not how that works. You aren’t right just because you won. ]

And yes, actually winning a conflict where you’re specifically trying to conquer new territory does make you right.

I don’t understand why we’re the only people on earth that have to answer for taking of new territory, when we’ve put it to much better use than the people who were living on it previously. Somehow we’re the most humane conquerors in history, save for maybe Cyrus of Persia, and yet we’re expected to answer for every death. Sorry, I won’t apologize for things that happened during a war, 200 years ago.

[ So the Nazis are only wrong because they lost. Got it. I’m not asking anyone alive today to answer for the people that were killed, but the people who did the killing sure as hell are responsible. ]


You’re asking America as a whole to say “we were wrong, so sorry” and change how things work because whiteguilt.exe

Based on your logic, Washington and Jefferson should be kicked off the 1 and 2 dollar bills, because they were slave owners after all, and we can’t have that in our history.

“History is written by the victors.” If the Nazis had won, do you think your history book might be a little different? I do. We wouldn’t know about a great number of their transgressions. And from their point of view, they’d teach that they were the morally righteous group.

Might literally makes right. Unless someone can or will challenge your authority, then saying “you’re wrong” is just whining.

Violence is the root of all authority, and consequently, the reluctance to engage in it, or failure to use it to your own advantage, places you under the authority of someone who can.

Why do you pay taxes? Because you’ll get fined if you don’t. What if you don’t pay the fines? Men with guns will come and find you. What if you don’t go with them voluntarily? They will force you, with lethal force if necessary.

There is no authority without violence, or the threat of it, and consequently, conquered people have no choice but to submit to their conqueror, or fight him to the death

[ Hey Bill. I mean sure, you’re an angry old piss ant who’s angry at the world because you get your rocks off to dead children overseas. But I mean are so fucking dense, so fucking delusional to think that the Native Americans were on OUR land? Oh so just shelling them off their properties, confining them onto small plots of property on the opposite end of the country, landscapes and climates they grew up in is a sense of “entitlement”? The US government killed more Native Americans than they killed protecting their own land, and somehow they’re the fucking problem? I mean do you just gargle with the government’s dick or are you so fucking stupid that you honestly believe any of that was justified? Sure, I mean, since when did you give a shit about human rights? You’re a cranky old has been who spends more of his time pretending his military service makes you some kind of fucking god when really, my friends and family in the military would sooner put a boot up your ass for your sadistic and pathetic excuse for morals. You’re a tool. A racist old windbag who’s beyond his glory years who spends his time pretending to be some just cause on a website filled with people a quarter his age. Now, you see I’m one who prefers to use logic and facts instead of some fucked up bias he learned from watching Alex Jones and Bill O'Rielly, but in this case, I’m willing to make an exception. Because frankly, no one cares about your shitty, cynical world view. In fact, your delusions of grandeur are so misguided you think that people actually respect you just because you were in the military. You’re a disgrace to the uniform and anyone who died protecting the liberties of everyone in this god damned country. You and people like you are the problem with this country. Not Obama, bot MUH Muslims. Nah, just a bunch of has been whiners who hide behind a badge or uniform as if it excused your sorry excuse for an exisance. Get fucked. ]


LOL Wat?

Do you get this pissed at Alexander being called “The Great” since he killed a whole fuckload of people, took their land, and made it his?

It is our land, because they lost it to us. What is so hard to understand about that?

If someone else fought the US, and took over our land, it would cease to be our land, and would be their land.

Would I be happy about that? No. But my choices would be to die fighting for my land or accept my new rulers.

Also, just for giggles, how old do you think I am, exactly?

Truman #conspiracy answers.yahoo.com

Liberals, what do you think about the lgbt agenda being forced onto children?

Drag queens brainwashing kindergarteners into their lifestyle, gay couples molesting their adopted kids & the media covering it up, satanic elite pedophile cults, child sex trafficking, gay & lesbian sex parades where naked perverts hump each other in front of all the kids there, gay propaganda forced on kids in public schools, all these pedophilia cartoons on the internet, evil rich Jews orchestrating the whole thing because the Talmud says it's okay to molest gentile children, Muslims raping kids & liberals still supporting them, satanic Hollywood rampant with child sexual abuse, liberal culture in general sexually perverted in front of children, transexuality being forced onto kids who are too young to even understand sexuality, little boys put in dresses & given hormones, little girls being treated like sex objects in "fashion" shows & "dance" classes run by gays, Disney putting gay scenes in kids movies.

The Illuminati are satanic pedophiles and they control the mainstream culture. They use the gay agenda to destabilize civilization & make the masses into their sex slaves who are too sensual to think, too hedonistic to care, and so perverted that they put their lusts above any greater good.

But what do you think about it being forced onto children like this? I realize liberals are evil & they like to corrupt the innocence of children. So am I a hateful bigot for wanting to protect children from the lgbt pedophile agenda?

LippySplitter #fundie imdb.com

God exists whether you believe in Him or not. And belief in God should NOT be kept away from politics. I bet you have no idea how many Christian leaders we've had who have let their religion affect their political decisions for the BETTER. We'd probably still have slaves if Lincoln didn't inject God into his politics and we'd probably still have British rule if the colonials didn't flee from godless Englanders to start their own country for religious freedom.

WARNING: Disturbing, Graphic Content Ahead

Child and infant rape with BDSM, Legally binding pedophile apologia

Justice Kathleen Caldwell & Dr. Mark Pearce #sexist thestar.com

[font=sans-serif]This post has one of the highest proportions of "legitimately serious possible triggers" to words I've seen: Count(triggers) / Count(words) hardly ever hits closer to 1 than this, so I'm not even going to try to list them; the "award" alone should give enough caution of what lies below. There are at least a couple things that cross over into other hotbeds of psychological traumatization, ones barely tangentially related to any form of child abuse or rape. I put what I thought were the worst parts in light grey, and I decreased the font size (partially for length and partially as a subtle, mild deterrent). If you decide to start reading this, and it starts fucking with you mentally, or even if you start wondering if what might come next will, then just stop. I should have. –shy[/font]

Court says ‘pedophilia does not apply’ — because perpetrator is a woman

Female pedophiles. She-monsters.

No such thing. Probably not. A woman can’t be a pedophile. Probably not. The clinical research is thin. Maybe the experts will change their mind, by and by. That happens a lot in the imprecise science of psychiatry.Although one expert’s mind was not changed by this:

A toddler sits at the woman’s feet, his small hands holding on to either leg. In this position, the woman — naked below the waist — masturbates using a baby bottle. The toddler, giggling, then grabs the bottle and drinks from it. The woman looks directly into the camera and smiles. That was one video seized by police from the Toronto home where the woman lived with her husband. On another video, the same woman is lying in bed with the same toddler. Both are naked. She begins to lick the child’s anus. Looking at the camera, she smacks her lips. A third video: The little boy is seated naked on a change table. The woman puts the child’s penis into her mouth. The child giggles.

In all, investigators discovered 25,066 child pornography images on more than 50 electronic devices when they executed a search warrant on April 25, 2016, including 111 child porn movies.

The couple is also shown engaging in BDSM (bondage/domination/sadism/masochism) activities with other couples. Police also found a contract signed by the “Slave” and her “Master,” an agreement containing rules and tasks to be completed by the woman as the submissive member in the relationship. They’d met through a website called “Bondage.com.” That’s who Jason Dickens and Dylan McEwen were, a man and woman joined in holy BDSM during a 2007 “collaring” ceremony — literally collaring — followed a year later by an ordinary wedding in front of family and friends.

Last week, Dickens, a former actor on Degrassi High, pleaded guilty to several child pornography offences, including two counts of making child porn, with an agreed statement of facts read into the record. Earlier this year, McEwen also pleaded guilty to sexual assault and two child pornography offences. She was sentenced to six years. But what the presiding judge would not do was declare McEwen a dangerous offender, which the Crown had sought and with impassioned urgency. In rejecting the long-term offender order, Justice Kathleen Caldwell weighed the various criteria that must be met, primarily a “substantial risk of reoffence.” Caldwell determined that McEwen wasn’t such a risk, relying heavily on the evidence and psychiatric report prepared by a forensic psychiatrist with expertise in paraphilia and sexual deviancy.

Dr. Mark Pearce was agreed upon as an expert witness by both the Crown and the defence when he testified in February. He diagnosed McEwen as a masochist and low-risk to reoffend [sic]. Caldwell accepted Pearce’s conclusion that McEwen derived sexual arousal not from acts committed against children but from the “extreme humiliation” of her involvement in those acts, which fed her masochism, described as on the moderately severe end.

The judge wrote (and read aloud in court): “Dr. Pearce testified that the current research suggests that women do not suffer from paraphilic disorders apart from masochism. This fact lends further weight to the conclusion that pedophilia does not apply to you.”

Crown Attorney Lisa Henderson, the judge noted, had “rigorously challenged” Pearce on this assertion.

“(I) agree that at first blush it appears illogical that women do not suffer from other paraphilic disorders,” Caldwell continued. “Sometimes, however, that which appears reasonable is anything but and vice versa. I accept the doctor’s evidence on this point. He did agree that this conclusion might change in the future as psychiatry continues to develop, but I cannot base my conclusions on speculative potential that have yet to develop.”

In this particular case, McEwen was her husband’s slave, committed to do his bidding. Court also heard, however, that McEwen had initiated at least one of the toddler videos without her “Master” present. And in at least two earlier instances, McEwen had obtained child pornography from two men she’d met online before she’d even met Dickens.

As for the risk-assessment testing, Caldwell acknowledged that such testing hasn’t been validated as being accurate in predicting risk with female, as opposed to male, sex offenders. They don’t really know what they’re talking about, the experts, because they haven’t looked at the phenomenon closely enough.

As an aside, at the Dickens trial, court heard that in 2003 a London-area woman offered him her 14-year-old daughter for sex after they’d connected online. Dickens took the teenager on a movie and date night, then had sex at the girl’s home while her mother sat beside them. Sex with teens and children had clearly been a feature of the couple’s role-playing, in their video commentary to one another, the child porn retrieved from their home and posters also discovered depicting female children, labelled with such descriptors as “15-year-old f--- slut” and “whore.”

In an interview this week with the Star, Pearce emphasized the scarcity of research literature on female sex offenders: “I’m not saying there’s no such thing as a female pedophile , but it is almost an exclusively male disorder. That’s not to say no woman has it. There may be some outliers. But women (sex offenders) usually offend for other reasons, not because of an innate sexual attraction to children. [...] These are damaged, needy, lonely women, not necessarily pedophiles.”

There was immense frustration at 720 Bay — in the attorney general’s office — over McEwen dodging the dangerous offender designation. But there will be no appeal.

Sobha Chauhan #fundie atimes.com

BJP candidate promises to aid child marriage in Rajasthan

A female candidate of the ruling party aims to make political gains out of an age-old exploitative practice

While Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is propagating the campaign “Save Daughters, Educate Daughters” (Beti Bachao, Beti Padao), a female candidate of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for an upcoming state election is promising to facilitate child marriage in the northern state of Rajasthan.

Sobha Chauhan, who is running for the BJP in Sojat, in Rajasthan’s Pali district, was seen in a widely circulated video saying that she had satta (power) and sangathan (state government) and would “not let the police intervene in child marriages.”

Chauhan was addressing a public gathering in Sojat ahead of Rajasthan Legislative Assembly polls scheduled for this Friday, December 7. The promise, made for political gain locally, could dent the BJP’s image on a wider level in the crucial national-level election next year as India strives to do away with the age-old custom of child marriage.

Child marriage still plagues many parts of India, leading to exploitation of young girls and damage to their health, childhood and education. Rajasthan reports the highest incidence of child marriage in the country, according to research published by the non-governmental organization Young Lives in coordination with the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights. The study was based on the 2011 census, the latest available data.

Sojat’s returning officer Ayub Khan, who oversees the conduct of elections, said the Election Commission had issued a notice to Chauhan seeking an explanation of her actions.

“We have got this video which has gone viral. The notice was issued yesterday. She has been given two days’ time to reply,” Khan was quoted as saying by The Times of India on Sunday.

The practice, where an underage girl (below the age of 18 years) is married to another underage boy (below the age of 21 years) or an adult man, is banned in India under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. The law has provisions to punish any adult participating in or facilitating such a marriage with up to two years in prison or a fine of as much as 100,000 rupees (US$1,425) or both.

The 2006 act, which replaced the Child Marriage Restraint Act of 1929, entitles a child who was married off to obtain an annulment by filing a petition to a District Court within two years of becoming an adult. The 1929 act was the first to prohibit child marriage in India. It came into being in British India as a result of the country’s social-reform movement and despite opposition from the British.

Moreover, in a landmark judgment last year, the Supreme Court of India ruled that sexual intercourse with a wife under 18, the legal age of consent, is rape.

According to reports, earlier this year, the federal Ministry of Women and Child Development proposed to amend the existing child-marriage law by declaring such marriages “void ab initio” or invalid from the outset. But the bill is pending before the cabinet.

The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act of 2006 doesn’t invalidate child marriage but gives the contracting parties the option to annul it.

biblicalgenderroles #fundie #sexist biblicalgenderroles.com

Is her husband raping her or abusing her by having sex with her when she is not in the mood?

Aside from his physically harming her by forcing himself upon her no he is NOT abusing his wife from a Biblical perspective. Even if he did physically force himself upon her – it is IMPOSSIBLE Biblically speaking for a man to rape his wife. Abuse? Yes. Rape? No. For a larger discussion of the Biblical impossibility of marital rape I refer you again to my post “Is a husband selfish for having sex with his wife when she is not in the mood”.

If he convinces her to yield her body to him, then no sin has been committed on his part. But it is very possible that even if she yields to him – there is still sin on her part. If she acts disgusted by him and acts like he has no right to have sex with her – then the sin lies squarely in her court. She needs to eliminate the terms “rape” and “molester” from her vocabulary regarding her husband’s sexual advances toward her.

Ian #fundie groups.google.co.uk

1.


a. Tax men to build more rape shelters encouraging men to be resentful,
b. Cause women to think all romance not explicitly initiated by them
is rape, thus ruining their mental health when a man asks her out,
c. Ensure only the really attractive men get laid through mad, unrealistic
policies, thus alienating men, and breeding a new generation of
rapists,
d. increase the number of resent rapes, ie where men rape women to
teach them a lesson, for wearing next to nothing, then blowing
them out in front of their mates in front of a better looking man.


or ....


2.
a. Don't tax men to build more rape shelters, prevent rape by having
men walk women home, and make sure women know they owe something
for it.
b. Encourage men to ensure they walk women home, by improving chivalry,
c. Demonstrate to women that it is only a small amount of friction,
really, the repayment they are making for their escort.
d. decrease the number of resent rapes, by making women act responsibly
to men, (who have feelings too,) act consistently, and rewarding
chivalry with a shag.


Women get less action now than they did in the sixties. Is it
surprising why?

bill-11b #fundie bill-11b.tumblr.com


Islam is a disgusting belief set that preaches violence, rape, and hatred not just towards outsiders, but towards it’s own followers as well.
Child marriage and rape, death penalties for female rape victims labeled as adulterers, death penalties for gays, sex slavery, etc are all very prevalent in modern day middle eastern islam.

I find it to be a repugnant belief system that should have been left in the pages of history hundreds of years ago.
That being said, I don’t expect to change the world, nor do I have an interest in killing 1.6 billion people across Africa, the ME, Asia, and Europe.
However, I think islam as a belief system needs to be completely eradicated and forgotten like the cancer that it is.
Here’s the part that’s unpopular:

As long as islamists either insist on carrying out attacks in the west, or not standing up to those who do, islam has no place in the western world.
We should run raze mosques and run them the fuck out of our countries, right back to their third world shitholes, where they can brutalize and rape one another to death for all I care. |

Yes, that is collectivist. No, I don’t give a fuck.
The constitution is an ideal document. We live in reality, not in utopia.
Sometimes you have to do some shit that you don’t like to protect your own way of life. If they don’t want to play ball, fuck em.

If you don’t like that plan, then I implore you, please, explain to me how we determine who is a peaceful moderate, and who is a fundamentalized jihadist?
Keep in mind
All of those friendly people were peaceful moderates.
Until they weren’t.

Ana #fundie askaradfem.tumblr.com

The definition of rape seems to be subjective these days. I personally do not believe it is possible for a woman to rape a man, since I define rape as sexual male violence done to females, involving penile penetration orally,vaginally,or anally. Since women don’t have penises, by this definition they cannot rape…unless you’d go out of your way to use a foreign object. But even then I am conflicted, because the term rape also carries a historical context, in which rape has been, as is still largely used a tool by men to keep women subordinate, take away their autonomy, dehumanize them, impregnate, spread disease etc. Rape is used as a weapon during times of war, in which historically more women are killed during the organized mass rapes then the men who die in combat.

some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: Incel lurker who hates this culture

(gigatruecel)

But there’s more to me and more to my life than having sex. I love my family. I love video games, podcasts, theatre, music, animals, rain, reading, etc.

This is what we mean when we say cope. It's not just sex. It's a lack of romantic and social intimacy. This is shit human beings need to feel sane.

We're not saying everyone sucks. Half the shit on this sub is just memes. But you're fucking coping if you think you can live a happy and fulfilling life without intimacy and social relationships. You fucking can't, and you have NO idea what you're missing out on.

It's another world entirely. Falling asleep staring into the eyes of someone who loves you and trusts you completely. It's the essence of the human experience. Why do you think history is filled with love stories and romanticism? It is one of the strongest emotions we can feel, connecting with another person at that intimate level is critical for our well-being.

We are denied these experiences because we are ugly and/or short. Our lives are a fucking joke.

(ShallowEcho)
"childish made-up terminology" - Aka I can't be bothered to read up the shit and since I don't understand it I need someone to spoon-feed me, wah wah I'm a 21 yo manbaby.

"Anyone who tries to look on the bright side and actually be happy is “coping” - If you base your happiness in false premises you're fucking coping, no way around that. Reality is tough and while plenty of females won't admit to these awful rough things, the fact of the matter is that those superficial "horrid" thoughts are what guide their mate selection, you can keep the "not all wamehn" cope as long as you want you'll eventually come to terms with it.

"Don't go for those women" - You're implying there are women we can go for, fact of the matter is, unless you're someone who literally has 0 self-steem and wants to be stepped on and cucked, you probably aren't gonna really find anyone in your life if you're an ugly fuck. If you earn enough income and lack the self steem you can find some femoid that will fuck you a couple times and then see some chadster behind your back while you bankroll her, that's the best you can hope in an "optimist" scenario. You're talking out of your ass.

"But there’s more to me and more to my life than having sex."- This proves to me you don't even fucking know what the deal is. It's not about finding someone to fuck, you can pay hookers for that, it's about finding a relationship you big fucking mongo. It's like you took a big chug of IT and just came here in your soy-fueled rage to dump a fucking paragraph no how fucking retarded and out of touch with this community you are, and you do so in a hillariously sad fucking way because you're also trying to teach a lesson without having even learned who you're talking to. Get a fucking grip man.

(Salusa-Secundus)
Retard, women can be nice to you but they'll never be attracted to you. This is what we mean. They aren't all bitches to lower tier men but they'd all sooner fuck the tall handsome Trump supporter over us,.even if they were feminists.

There are white supremacists getting laid RIGHT NOW while you rot away in misery.

why would i want to sleep with/have a relationship with someone who would sleep with a white supremacist? My point is, I don't care if awful women sleep with awful men. They can have each other. Women are more complex than you give them credit for. Humankind as a whole has a variety of people. And women are human. ergo, there are different women with differing preferences. Some may prefer racists, but others prefer feminists, to use your example. They can't all be painted with such a broad brush.

Richard Spencer (you know him) has a LIBERAL girlfriend. Half of Reddit is basically male feminist virgins and he's having way more success than them.

All women are awful by that metric. They can be nice and even friends with you but they'll always pick the guy they are attracted to, at least for sex.

Face it boyo.

THEY PREFER THE GUY THEY WANT TO FUCK. Doesn't matter for shit what kind of person they are.

(enjoy_life88)
This is just another IT meme - "I'm a virgin, but at least I'm not an incel!"


I’m 21 years old
I love video games, podcasts, theatre, music, animals, rain, reading, etc.

You're coping, just like all of us. No one said there are not other things in life that one can enjoy, to forget about the fundemental things your life is lacking. That IS coping.

But add 10 years. The effect of copes will fade. The void inside you will get bigger and bigger.

Get off your high horse, fren.

(MayflyEng)

I don't enjoy self identifying as an incel for the same reason a woman may avoid the title of feminist. People who fit under the umbrella take the word too far and apply unwanted context to it. If you say you're a feminist people hear feminazi. If you say you're an incel, people hear woman-hating ephebophile.

I suppose i object to the word cope because of the context that surrounds it as well. A incel can't find joy in something without someone commenting and reminding him that his life is terrible and the thing he finds joy in is really only a distraction. But for me personally, I think I'd enjoy the things I mentioned regardless of relationships or not. Maybe I'd enjoy them less often, because I'd have a relationship to fill my time, but I'd still enjoy them.

And maybe you're right about time being a deciding factor in my "naivete". I can't see the future, but i think I'm overall a decent enough person to find someone before I'm 31.

You're probably fakecel then.

What has given you this hope you will find someone by 30?

You're probably not actually incel if people haven't crushed that hope out of you.

How many times have you been rejected by your looksmatch?

Edit: not sure how someone who's 5'2 still has hope lol unless they have a model tier face, and even then... Good for you I guess. One day that'll be gone and it will hurt.

I've 5'2", somewhat overweight, no muscle mass, a very plain-ugly face, kicked out of college, so poor I'm straddling the poverty line, and I don't have a car. But I'm also a good person. As long as I've got that going for me, I still have hope

Cope. Most of the people here are good people. In fact the majority of the world is good people. It doesn't get you anything.

Women even go for murderers over incels, but you won't see anyone here tell people to bundymaxx

Lose the weight. Fatcel is volcel, but IDK if it matters at 5'2. Still good for quality of life though.

Good luck with the poverty.

TrumpFan1966 #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Donald Trump is a Rothschild puppet.

There is simply no other conclusion to reach if you start connecting the dots.

Look who owned Resorts International (and its history) before Trump bought it. This is significant.

Look who bailed Trump out of all of his failed businesses, particularly the casinos (now look who that person worked for. Starts with an "R" ends with a "d". This person is now our Commerce Secretary).

Look who Trump has appointed throughout his cabinet.

Look who Ivanka used to date.

Look who Steve Munchkin used to work for.

Look who Jared Kushner has worked with.

Look who Trump has worked with.

Look who just staged the Syria false flag.

I mean... this stuff would be fucking comical, if it weren't so sickening.

I understand the "media hates him", but keep in mind, the elites rule through divide and conquer, and through the Right / Left Paradigm. Or have we forgotten that around here?

We now must ask, Is Trump in on it, an unknowing dupe or just an actor?

I'd venture to say carefully groomed for many years, and propped up by forces around him, to play a role. His character utterly scrutinized from A to Z through algorithms used by the elites surrounding him. They know him head to toe, how he will act, behave, respond.

Remember, Trump's politics have wildly differed over the years.

In 1999, he basically said Pat Buchanan was a racist, and slammed The Reform Party for making him the nominee.

He said Oprah would be a great president.

He issued a public plan to force rich people to pay a one-time "luxury tax" to pay off the debt.

He's contradicted himself thousands of times.

We have no idea what his principles are. We just know for the election he took on a wildly populist, pro-America, somewhat right-wing, anti-Establishment position.

Take a look at his meetings with foreign leaders now that he is president. Most of the time he does not wear the translation earpiece! Look it up on YouTube. He has no idea what they are saying, yet he sits there and nods.

Trump did not write a single word of "The Art of the Deal". This is a fact, look it up.

Trump once said if he wasn't a "businessman", he'd have gotten into the movies and gone to Hollywood.

Trump, when asked on Letterman years ago what he'd do if he "lost it all", said he'd open a marketing firm. The crowd booed, expecting him to say he'd start over in business, rather than find a way to promote himself.

Trump actually is an actor. Look at his Wiki bio or IMDB profile.

Think about all of this.

Add it up, critically.

Take your blinders off.

Stop putting your FAITH in a man.

We are so far down the line.

We got played.

He was our only choice, but it really wasn't a choice at all. Hillary or Trump? No difference.

In some sense, this is worse, because we actually think we won, when we didn't. At least with Hillary we know who the enemy is.

It was hard for me to write this, because I believed in Trump -- with a few doubts -- but this is the truth.

You cannot deny Trump's Rothschild and Soros connections. You cannot. They're all there, all intertwined.

Trump was consistently propped up despite his business failures over the years by these very people, and now they own him, and he's paid them back by dutifully appointing them to key positions in government.

Furthermore, very little has fundamentally changed.

We see what are largely "window dressing" promise-fulfillments, lacking teeth. E.O.'s, but no meaningful legislation. We see Trump issue a ban on 7 Muslim countries, but not Saudi Arabia. We see Trump lay down to the court rulings.

We see Trump entirely endorsing Ryancare and blasting the Freedom Caucus, with seemingly little interest in the details of the health care plan.

We see Trump completely go back on his promise to "lock her up" (he now calls the Clintons "good people").

Trump is not in control.

We see a man either following a script provided to him, or a man totally in the dark, and "winging" it as he goes along.

He is not leading. He is not "draining the Swamp". Little has changed.

His token gestures and reassurances are simply there to keep the "base" shored up, and from engaging in outright revolt.

We see a man who does what he is told, and trusts all the wrong people.

I don't know the full story, but what you see above IS the truth -- not all of it -- but a bit part of it.

I'll remind you this is a conspiracy site, where we should be allowed to openly QUESTION things around us.

The greatest TRICK the DEVIL ever played was convincing the world HE DID NOT EXIST.

caamib #sexist fstdt.com

benjamin2k is being naive. Western sluts want and need rape.

This is widely known by anybody who isn't a brainwashed mangina. It's known even among various disparate groups that don't quite like each other, like Red Pillers and conservative Jews/Muslims.

Modern Western women aside from few exceptions like Amish or Hasidic Jews, are disgusting braindead sluts and slugs who enjoy violent men and being raped. The idea that you can enter a relationship with them is insane. They'd kill the child of any man who'd want to take care of it. This is simply because women want to breed with men who make most kids, and such men are stupid, worthless criminals today. So you have this kind of a dissociation where a criminal will make a child and the state/beta cuck will take care of it. The same person can't be a father and take care of a child in advanced feminism.

And remember - if she stays alive a guy won't.

optimal prime #conspiracy forum.prisonplanet.com

Hollywood pedo culture normalized.

From James gunn we now have Dan harmon with baby rape and people are trying to defend ,this sick bullshit that has been on twitter forever. but they are going after conservatives voices on twitter and not this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=To-Moxlql1k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDTq69rFRY8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0S3MFusaw

Rick and Morty? Creator Dan Harmon Deletes Twitter Account After Fake Baby Rape Video Goes Viral
6321
Writer/ actor Dan Harmon attends the Seeso original screening of 'HarmonQuest' at The Virgil on July 12, 2016 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Emma McIntyre/Getty Images for Seeso)Emma McIntyre/Getty Images for Seeso
23 Jul 20186,594
Rick and Morty creator Dan Harmon deleted his Twitter account this weekend after a fake baby rape video featuring him resurfaced and went viral on social media.
In the five-minute video, Harmon plays a child molester named Daryl who climbs through a window, pulls down his underwear, and rubs his genitals on a plastic baby doll lying on a couch.

?Hi, I?m Dan Harmon. You?re about to watch my controversial new pilot Daryl,? Harmon says in the video, which was presumably intended to be a joke and parody of Showtime?s hit series Dexter.
Dan Harmon also makes remarks such as, ?I rape babies,? on camera.



After the video surfaced online, the creator of NBC?s Community deleted his official Twitter account. Harmon is the latest major Hollywood figure to garner attention for having produced online content making light of pedophilia and child rape.

Last week, Disney severed ties with Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn after several posts joking about child rape resurfaced.

In one blog post, which Gunn published in 2010, the director claimed to have orgasmed over a video featuring ?pubescent? children, which he says was sent to him by a friend named Huston Huddleston. The video, some defenders have suggested, is a girls? choir singing the Divinyls pop hit ?I Touch Myself.?

It appears that the Huddleston whom Gunn says sent him the video is registered sex offender Huston Huddleston, who pleaded guilty earlier this year to one count of possessing child pornography.

Last week, old posts on Twitter by actor-comedian Michael Ian Black about child molestation also went viral after resurfacing on social media.

?Black?s controversial tweets are filled with sexual innuendos about children, including so-called jokes about having sleepovers with young girls and having ?quick? intercourse with a baby,? reported Breitbart News? Joshua Caplan.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/07/23/r-kelly-releases-19-minute-song-addressing-assault-sex-slave-allegations/

https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/07/23/marvel-star-dave-bautista-disney-gave-in-to-cyber-nazis-with-james-gunn-firing/

IHateRoasties, footballsubbing & lickmytushyhole #fundie reddit.com

Re: Based parenting

image

In reaction to a LADbible article titled
“Mum Wants 14-Year-Old Daughter To Get Plastic Surgery Because 'Ugly People Get Nowhere'
She doesn't care about her education and is encouraging her to follow in the footsteps of influencers instead.”

(IHateRoasties)

this is NOT based. This is degenerate and her looksmatch is roping atm. Good morning, I hate women.

I wish my Mum gave me HGH, paid for plastic surgery and helped me truly maximise my looks when I was younger. That Mum is 100% right and people don’t like that because it goes against the grain.

Theres a big difference. You are a guy. You have one tenth the SMV of your looksmatch. You need a surgery in order to do anything, a girl doesnt.

Really isn’t any difference the benefits are just magnitudes larger. If I was a girl I’d still wish my Mum helped me maximise myself, if I didn’t want to be a influencer it’d still help me in every other aspect of life. Job interviews are usually given the any attractive girl.

if you were a girl youd have two thousand orbiters and wouldnt give a fuck about lookism, plus you can use fakeup

Makeup is still a form of lookism for girls. There’s also a huge difference between a foid and an attractive foid in terms of benefits.

(footballsubbing)

this is NOT based. This is degenerate and her looksmatch is roping atm. Good morning, I hate women.

Can't agree. She ain't wrong is she?

You might not like it but this is blackpilled as fuck.

(lickmytushyhole)

I see nothing wrong with this. Truancy is fascist bullshit. Props to the mom