Similar posts

Robin Bright #conspiracy #homophobia #sexist #ufo #fundie ufodigest.com

That Hollywood, which is a district of the city of Los Angeles (L.A.) in the United States of America on the west coast of the continent of North America in the state of California, should be called ‘Babylon’ after the capital city of the Persian Empire, Babylon (c. 4000 B.C.), derives from a description of ‘a woman’, Babylon, by Jesus’ disciple, John, in his apocalyptic Revelation of the future, ‘Mystery, Babylon the great, mother of harlots and of the abominations of the Earth.’ (Rev: 17. 5) Hollywood is called ‘Babylon’ because it’s the capital of the global media Empire of the USA and has been since the first movie was made there by director D. W. Griffith, Old California (1910), before the censorship of the ‘Hays code’ (1934-67), established by President of the Motion Picture Producers Of America (MPPDA), Will Hays, effectively made it impossible for humans to ever learn anything of their own mode of sexual reproduction from mainstream mass media edutainment on the moral grounds that it would encourage adultery.

Christianity, after Jesus ‘Christ’, that is, ‘the chosen’, assured everyone it frowned on adultery severely, and despite Jesus’ leniency: `… women, in love scenes, at all times have `at least one foot on the floor` (in other words, no love scenes in bed).`1 Christianity’s moral stance is based on Jesus’ words to a woman allegedly caught in the act of adultery in the New Testament of the Bible, which Christians believe supersede the Old Testament law and history of the Jewish ‘chosen people’ of God, that is, the Torah and Talmud written in their Hebrew language, ‘Let he that is without sin cast the first stone.’ (John: 8. 7) Because women are capable of sexually reproducing with each other, as the futanarian human species of women’s seed, adultery is what men practice on their race. Moreover, as it seems unlikely that women would ever marry, given the opportunity to be free of their ring slavery in host womb parasitism for war against their species, women aren’t ever adulterate. Consequently, Hollywood’s stance against adultery is a sham designed to suppress women’s seed, because if women were seen to be able to sexually reproduce with each other through the medium of cinema or television, it’d threaten the system of human slavery imposed upon the Earth by an alien rulership.

As 100, 000 women of the human futanarian species of women’s seed could sexually reproduce 1. 5, 000, 000 in 34 years, women are the perfect planetary colonist should their species ever achieve interstellar space travel. However, if they can be prevented from producing enough brainpower to give them the permanent memory through the immortality conferred by medical science to build and maintain the starship technology needed to carry them to the planets amongst the stars of heaven above and beyond the Earth, they’ll remain host womb slaves in parasitism. Although parasitism seems harsh in describing what men do with women, parasitologists use the term ‘parasitoid’ to describe the parasite that emerges from the host to kill it, and that’s what men do in their wars against women’s seed, ‘The dragon was wroth with the woman and went to make war upon the remnant of her seed.’ (Rev: 12. 17) At least since the period of ancient Egypt, men and women have been manufactured as a single male brained creature wearing each other’s clothes as a transvestite for ‘TV war’. In the myth of Ra, the sun god, he’s incarnated as Osiris, who is dismembered by his evil brother, Set. Although the goddess, Isis, remembers him, his phallus can’t be found, so Isis gives him hers, that is, without women’s seed the human race is a TV. Osiris is restored as Horus, ‘the sky god’, because satellite TV is more advanced.

When US President Ronald ‘Ray Gun’ Reagan announced his ‘Strategic Defense Initiative’ (SDI) on March 23, 1982, to establish a ‘ground and space based missile system’, it was labeled ‘Star Wars’ after the 1977 movie, Star Wars IV: A New Hope, featuring a ‘Death Star’ created by the evil Empire of Palatine to orbit planets and kill them, that is, it was an advanced Egyptian satellite TV system. The symbol of ‘the sky god’, Horus, is the hawk, because he has a hawk’s head, and the members of the Republican Party in the United States who’re gung-ho for war are known as hawks, that is, it’s the hawks of war that seek to prevent the human futanarian species of women’s seed from escaping the Earth to colonize the planets.

The actors and actresses in Hollywood are known as ‘stars’, because they are trained to be ‘egoids’. It was ‘the father of psychoanalysis’, Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), that created the term ‘id’ to explain that the unconscious contained material repressed by the conscious mind because of taboo; for example, Christian morality’s taboo against adultery caused society to become sexually repressive to the extent that Africa’s DR Congo discovered a simian immune deficiency virus (SIV) mutation transmitted by homosexuals’ mixing of blood, shit and semen in each other’s anus in 1983. The human deficiency virus (HIV) injected at the base of the spine resulted in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), and collapse of the organs of the body, before the brain died. In short, Freudian psychology was the basis for understanding that homosexuality in the human ‘id’ produced an ‘incurable killer disease’ as their ‘biological weapon’ aimed at eradicating the human species, because that’s what Christian morality and homosexuals were for.



Although ‘ego’ was a term used by Freud, it was Carl Jung (1875-1961), a developmental, rather than a repression psychologist, that saw it as a vehicle for individuation through what he called ‘the archetypes of the collective unconscious’. Jung argued that the unconscious of each human individual contained archetypes, that is, images to be found in dreams, art and the imagination, which assisted the development of the ego, that is, consciousness. Where Freud posited a Super-ego that functioned as a censor to repress into the ‘id’ or unconscious, Jung posited a shadow level to the unconscious, corresponding to human instinct, which contained the archetypes. Consequently, it was only necessary to allow the instinctual subconscious shadow to emerge through art, dreams and imagination for ego-consciousness to develop.

Hollywood egos were called stars, because the life of most planets is dependent on their local sun, which for the Earth is its day star, Sol. In other words, actors and actresses were perceived as commensurate with suns in regard to planets, that is, they were their life. What this produced is describable as ‘egoid’, that is, a star’s belief that their ego was greater than that of the planetary consciousness. In simple terms, because men and women are a TV, they’re unable to accept the anonymity of being a woman amongst women’s seed, so they wage war on the human race in order to assert their egoism, which is ego-id, that is, a conflation of Jung’s ego and Freud’s id. For Hollywood unable to celebrate human sexual activity, ‘action’ movies featuring violence against an unnamable horror is usual, although war against women is what its audience are for. Typical is the nucleus of brave heroes fighting against an alien invasion, for example, Independence Day (1996), because it’s a psychological displacement of men’s actual role as aliens invading women’s Earth. In the ID4 movie, actor Bill Pullman has the role of US President Thomas Whitmore who, before an air battle with the alien invader, addresses USAF personnel in the west of the United States’ Area 51 top secret facility, which is 134 km north-northwest of the city of Las Vegas, near Hiko, Tonopah Basin, State Route 318, Lincoln County, Nevada state, a locale where research on alien spacecraft and their occupants has unofficially always occurred:

‘Good morning. In less than an hour, aircraft from here will join others from around the world, and you will be launching the largest aerial battle in the history of mankind. Mankind. That word should have new meaning for all of us today. We can’t be consumed by our petty differences anymore. We will be united in our common interests. Perhaps it’s fate that today is the Fourth of July, and you will once again be fighting for our freedom. Not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution … but from annihilation. We’re fighting for our right to live. To exist. And should we win the day, the Fourth of July will no longer be known as an American holiday, but as the day when the world declared in one voice: We will not go quietly into the night! We will not vanish without a fight! We’re going to live on! We’re going to survive! Today we celebrate our Independence Day!’2

As women are capable of sexually reproducing 15 billion from 1 million in 34 years, even if the age of conception were formally agreed as 16 +, men would have had to have killed a huge number of women in order to be the dominant invading alien creature. However, because Hollywood stars are egoid, that’s what they’re produced for.

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: MFW some fat "woke" feminist dyke or Stacy CEO that got to her place with pretty face and sucking cock are considered "strong" and "empowering" today, meanwhile women 100 years ago who had to work on land and take care of 5 kids while husband slaved in factory were seen as "oppressed" and "weak"

(fiveshowersadaycel)

I cannot take female leaders seriously

As you said, 99-100% of them got to where they are because of affirmative action gender quotas and because companies need to appear "woke"

lmao imagine having a voting right and throwing it away on some foid, literally cuckoldry

women shouldnt be in politics, they ruin societies by expanding welfare state, enabling nihilism, sexual "liberation", materialism and they think with emotions, not brain and logic.

also most of women who vote, vote for whatever their husbands support, the hottest politician or for whoever mainstream media panders too as a saint while successfully demonizing other as a devil, literally getting played on by emotions, they cannot comprehend politics besides some few useless identity politics issues, meme gender jfl

Married women vote like their husband (aka right wing). Unmarried women vote for their husband (aka the state).

jeff bezos net worth iq

(RadiantUpstairs)

It's destroying Universities, especially the hard sciences like chem.

Top candidate by far in hard sciences is almost 100% of the time a male---this is if you use quantitative measures like publications, prestige of publications, patents, etc.

The Universities try to sell it like they will "pick the woman all things being equal," but in most hard sciences, they cannot get away with that because the women never equal the men, except once in a blue moon. So what you get is Chemistry profs who are equity hires. It's utterly ridiculous.

Meanwhile, they don't do this in China, so how are we supposed to compete?

(99_1_Rule)

Seeing Stacies in the workplace is actual suifuel.

So many of them get the most unfair treatment and leeway in everything that they do.

They are never pressured or talked to by anyone. No one ever approaches them and talks to them about their lacking work ethic, no one ever confronts them when they come in late or take too long of a break.

Stacy just shows up and giggles and laughs and collects her paycheck.

She flirts with and hits on all of the tall Chads that come through and come to her work. Always trying to give them as many freebies and handouts as they possibly can.

Chad will get asked if he wants free complimentary samples and shit when he goes out to eat.

He will get stuff comped and removed from his order when he goes out to eat because Stacy wants him to fuck her in the bathroom.

Stacy is esentially stealing from her workplace, and flirting and trying to fuck Chad while at work and no one cares.

Meanwhile, some incel sweating his ass off and working his soul out like a slave is told that he is lazy and isn't really putting in enough effort and that he will be let go if he doesn't improve.

Meanwhile, Stacy just giggles and laughs about giving Chad a 11 dollar meal for free and even sides with him when the manager questions her about it.

She would literally lose her job just to give Chad free food or free shit.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

(BrazilianSigonorrhea)

foids that have more than 0 children should be slaughtered mercilessly tbh tbh

ZhenRen #fundie dailykos.com

“Anarchy” (literally, no-rule, or rule-by-none) is the shortest-possible-lived state of affairs: in a general population, once an overall rule by government is removed, myriads of local rulers will immediately emerge — rulers of one over another by who is stronger in any way and more willing to resort to coercion — from playground bullies to petty warlords.

All those abusive ex-boyfriends under restraining orders? An anarchy can’t and won’t enforce those — so guess who’ll be back?

Any armed yahoos in the neighborhood? Heck, any drug houses? You thought you might have trouble keeping your property before… consider it all “tax” to the new Capo. Yeah, that’s how fast the “anarchy” disappeared.


Totally ignorant comment about how anarchism actually works.

As I said just upthread, anarchists turn authority over to the people, themselves, in an organization based on community and worker self-management. It is self-governance from below, where no one is allowed to have autocratic authority over the people. People can be delegated (with mandates) to take on tasks on behalf of the community, but the delegation can be revoked and recalled at any time. Anyone who tried to impute authority to themselves would have to justify it to the collective assembly of the community.

The community assembly would have a militia to defend against any force that would try to impose authority from above. They would have layers of complex organization extending from the small local assembly to international federations, all answering to the people at the bottom.

There are examples of anarchism working. It is a highly organized social structure with safeguards in place to avoid the problems you have imagined would exist.

please cite specific instances where anarchy didn’t lead to warlords.

Please cite an anarchist society that factually did “lead” to warlords.
Somalia.

Closer to home in space if not in time, Bleeding Kansas before the Civil War, and most of Missouri during the War, where roving bands of partisans for both sides intimidated, extorted and murdered with impunity.

The Spanish anarchists’ inability to fend off foreign aggression, by itself, points out a fundamental weakness of an anarhcist society. Even if its internal workings were Utopian, it still could not resist a well organized assault by a ruthless authoritarian enemy.

You can of course use the “no TRUE Scotsman” dodge to avoid acknowledging that any of these fit your definition of TRUE anarchism, but then we’re back to arguing abiut hypothetical Utopias instaed of real societies.


No, Somalia is not really anarchist. Name any anarchist organization with any large influence in Somalia. You're applying not anarchism as a sociopolitical organization of socialism from below, but anarchy in the sense of chaos. These are not the same concepts.

As to the anarchists in Spain not being able to fend off a coalition of aggressive nations and forces that vastly outnumbered them, that’s just nonsensical as an argument, since a good social form of community organization does not magically make such a society omnipotent against massive forces brought against them.

Gary Yourofsky #moonbat #crackpot adaptt.org

Sadly, the only glaring difference between the non-herbivore brain and the herbivore counterpart is that the former is incapable of understanding the value of compassionate living. And, YES, I am condemning carnivore/omnivore animals with the aforesaid statement. Herbivores are the ONLY evolved species on the planet. And they suffer more than anyone else because even animal rights activists support the bullying, bloody habits of carnivores and omnivores! If you’re thinking, “But what about the poor lion babies? What would happen if the momma didn’t kill zebras for them?” My response is quite simple: What about the zebra babies? Don’t they have a right to live long lives, and have their mommas alive when they grow up? Wouldn’t it be logical for everyone to get their nutrients directly from plant sources rather than consuming creatures who consumed them first? The Nyanyana crocodile farm in Zimbabwe has proven the validity of the aforesaid claim by converting more than 150,000 crocs to veganism. (Unfortunately, these vile slave-owners aren’t utilizing the vegan diet for ethical reasons as they are murdering the crocs and stealing THEIR skin for the “clothing” industry. But having more than 150,000 stone cold carnivores thrive on a vegan diet proves that veganism is for everybody.)

For the record, I am NOT starting a campaign to stop lions from murdering zebras. I am simply pointing out the insanity of defending victimizers instead of victims, and the hypocrisy of claiming to care about a lion’s murderous choices. First, since herbivores are the victims in this situation, empathy should be reserved for them only. Second, claiming to support lion-on-zebra-killings is disingenuous anyway because if you were hanging out with your dog in the backyard, and he was attacked by a homicidal bear, you would do anything to PREVENT the bear from harming your dog, even if you had to kill the bear! I am kinda curious if people think this hippo was wrong for trying to save a baby impala from a crocodile. Was this zebra misguided for not wanting to be part of this lion’s Death Circle? Were these buffaloes wrong for saving one of their babies from a pride of bloodthirsty carnivores? Was this buffalo wrong for saving his friend from a lion? Should we condemn this bear for saving a drowning crow but then choosing to eat an apple instead? How about the world’s first vegan shark. Should we roll our eyes at her because she doesn’t want to kill anymore? Didn’t this leopard display pure altruism when she protected a baby baboon from a skulking hyena, yet exhibit pure psychosis for killing the momma baboon in the first place? The previous example illustrates how all beings can choose to be rational or irrational. Unfortunately, many beings become psychotic when it’s dinner time. But it is possible for carnivores/omnivores to consciously choose compassion over violence, and still be perfectly healthy. Check out this recent video of a lioness protecting, playing with and THEN DEFENDING a baby wildebeest from another lioness who wants to kill the baby! And check out this story about Little Tyke, a lion who vehemently refused to eat her meals if meat was a part of them, or kill her lamb, chicken, cat and many other animal friends at a sanctuary in Washington in the late 1940s and early '50s.

Top 5s Finest #conspiracy youtube.com

5 Werewolves Caught on Tape & Spotted In Real Life!

Description:

Myths and stories of humans with the ability to transform into animals exist across all human cultures and histories. Some have suggested that these archetypes represent some type of subconscious human instinct, or desire. Others would suggest that these stories have a more literal meaning, and that perhaps, werewolves as they’re commonly known are real. Could it be possible through magic, curse, or virus, for a man to become animal? These are five werewolves caught on camera & spotted in real life. Let’s begin!

Dead Werewolf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oqmdbs1NcNY

These photos allegedly capture a dead werewolf laying stomach up in a river, and though the two hunters in the picture have never been identified the story that goes along with the photos is that they killed the creature when they found it before fleeing. The body appears to resemble the common idea of what a werewolf looks like It appears large, with a canine-like head and large upper body. Its has large, muscular appendages. The huge beast has a canine-like snout, and a mouth full of large saber teeth. Its hair is patchy and we can see the pink skin beneath.

Werewolf Roaming Garden

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-jhlFjxJjs

This video, allegedly captured in Brazil, shows what appears to be a large, hairy mammal invading a person’s garden. Though the CCTV footage is low resolution, we can make out the profile and movements of the animal. The creature initially approaches on four legs, but comes to walk and stand on two. According to the owner of the garden, the creature was about five feet tall. Some have said that this video captures footage of an ape, like a gorilla, but no primate from the New World is that large. The creature’s long, canin-like snout does not match the profile of a new world primate indigenous to the area, either.

Werewolf Walking in Street at Night in Brazil

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/F25XcqfGrsE/maxresdefault.jpg

This still from a Brazilian street at night allegedly captures a werewolf walking on its hind legs. This photo is part of an unreleased video recorded by a CCTV camera during the rash of sightings across Brazil that accompanied the previous video. The quality is much better in this picture than the last video, and the figure can be clearly seen. It has animal like legs that bend at the wrong angle, and a long wolf-like tail. It has a snout, and is covered in brown fur. The only thing that seems even remotely human about the creature is its hands. Some have claimed that this photo is fake, but those claims have never been proven.

Werewolf Killed in Brazil

http://mysteriousuniverse.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/dead-werewolf-copy-570x284.png

This photo allegedly captures another werewolf corpse, against related to a series of sightings in Brazil. This body was discovered by locals, but it allegedly disappeared quickly before an official investigation could be undertaken, leading them to suspect a cover up by the government. The head has a definitive canine-like structure, and large saber-like teeth. The upper body is covered in a thick layer of hair that extends down the arms to the large, clawed paws. The hair is disappearing from the lower half of the body, and its legs and feet while muscular appear almost humanoid. The werewolf sightings in Brazil stopped soon afterward.

WW2 German Werewolf Discovery

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNCNAxdCkRE

This footage was allegedly captured by German soldiers during World War II in Germany. While patrolling, the men allegedly came across the body of a werewolf. The werewolf, apparently female, lies dead on the forest floor in the tall, thick grass. Her feet appear human, and her entire body is covered with short but thick fur. The profile of the creature is that of a dog, but its snout is much shorter than the other bodies. The teeth are smaller, but just as sharp. The eyes are pearl white, perhaps because it is dead, and it has a full head of black hair. While some may claim this video to be fake, it’s important to remember that Germany recorded its soldiers for propaganda purposes, and there’s no knowing they may have found in those old woods.

agenda21 #conspiracy telegraph.co.uk

The criminal cartel (Council for Foreign Relations, NeoCons) that has taken control of the United States, supported by their gangster pals in Israel, London, Berlin, etc. etc., have decided to end all viable Nation-States in the Middle-East.
Any Nation that opposes Israel or refuses to follow US dictates is to be reduced to 'failed state status'. Like Iraq and Libya, Syria is earmarked for perpetual poverty, squalour, violence, mayhem and abject misery, under the boot of the Western controlled warlords in ISIL and the like.
The Syrian people, with the support of Russia, have, so far, managed to withstand the onslaught of the Western trained, armed and funded 'terrorist' thugs. Should al-Assad be toppled, Iran is next in line for the 'treatment'.

Despite the disgusting propaganda of the vast bulk of the MSM, and the frantic efforts of the 'useful idiots' and idiotic trolls. Most of the people in Britain and America do not support the criminal actions, and intentions, of the cretins in power.

CertifiedRabbi #racist reddit.com

My first real red pill occurred when I was 14-15 while I was doing research online about IQ. I already knew that I had a high IQ when I was accepted into a very prestigious private boarding school in New England, but I wanted to learn more about what exactly IQ is. And it was during that research online that I accidentally stumbled across the raging debate over racial IQ differences. After a lot of painful and uncomfortable research and soul-searching, I very reluctantly came to the extremely disturbing conclusion that the toothless, racist, inbred, skinhead, neo-Nazi, KKK pieces of shit really did have science and reality on their side.

But rather than just ending my red-pilling process there, it's probably a good idea to go over more of the details on my background in order to provide additional context to my current worldview since I think that it will help to dispel lazy stereotypes about most Alt-Righters being born into trailer parks or whatever.

My parents grew up in very liberal, wealthy families in the sister cities of Detroit and Flint, Michigan - two cities that were eventually completely ruined by black people during their lifetimes. But they first met each other at a law school that won't be named because I've already provided way too much doxxable info. After they graduated, they White Flighted to Fairfax County, Virginia - which is considered to be a part of the larger Washington, D.C. area (another city that was ruined by blacks) and is where I spent about half of my childhood.

Despite my parents being very liberal, they were actually quite socially conservative in many ways - such as their decision to not allow my siblings and I to watch TV or play video games growing up because they (correctly) thought that it would rot our brains. And the private boarding schools that I attended also didn't allow us to have TVs in our dorms. So, what do you do for entertainment when you can't watch TV or play video games? Read lots and lots of books. I had already read all of Carl Sagan's books, all of Stephen Hawking's books, all of Jared Diamond's books, and many other similar popular science books by the time that I was 13. So, I was an absolutely massive science fanboy growing up.

I was also super liberal and politically conscious growing up because my parents and grandparents were heavily involved in donating to and campaigning for the DNC for decades. Some of my earliest memories were being dragged around the Presidential campaigns of Clinton and Gore back in the 1990s and getting a behind-the-scenes look at the Clinton/Gore administration - which was pretty cool.

That's why I was so fucking incensed to see these racist, redneck fucktards dare try to claim that the science was on their side. I wanted to completely annihilate their arguments, and so I read a small mountain of books and at least a hundred blog posts and online articles and watched several documentaries on this topic before coming to the literally physically painful conclusion that the evil, subhuman racists really did have the data on their side, and that my liberal side of the debate was spouting half-truths and flat-out lies in a desperate attempt to combat White supremacy and uphold their liberal egalitarian paradigm.

I basically went full Kraut & Tea for about half a year or so researching this topic in my free time, except that I actually had the intellectual honesty to admit that the racists were right. I actually genuinely and naively believed in the liberal mantra of being open-minded and following the evidence regardless of how unpleasant it might be to my own sensibilities - and it caused me to realize that racism, social Darwinism, and eugenics is scientifically justified...

So, that was quite the traumatic red pill... But I actually managed to remain a loyal shitlib for several more years despite that paradigm-shattering realization on such an important issue. And that's because it's extremely hard to escape the liberal ideological bubble. My brain had basically been marinating in liberal propaganda my entire life. And simply being a Republican was enough to become a social pariah in the kinds of far-left social circles that I existed in. My family and friends were liberal as fuck, the communities that I lived in were liberal as fuck, the private boarding schools that I attended were liberal as fuck, the authors that I read were liberal as fuck, the popular culture that I consumed was uniformly liberal as fuck, the news that I consumed was liberal as fuck, the university that I attended was liberal as fuck, et cetera.
Reading books from far-left ideologues like Noam Chomsky in middle school and high school actually caused me to become even more far-left in my teens. I was even borderline Antifa at one point. But it was traveling to former and current communist countries, walking through museums that were dedicated to exposing communist crimes against humanity, and reading critiques of the left (e.g., The Black Book of Communism) which caused me to gradually become disillusioned with the left as I started college.

But the last straw that finally broke the camel's back was the brutal murder of my liberal White best friend by a pack of 15 MS-13 illegal immigrant gang members when we were both sophomores in college. I had never even heard of MS-13. While researching them online, I came across a random blog post by conservative pundit Michelle Malkin that was basically sounding the warning bells about the dangers of MS-13 in the Washington, D.C. area and condemning the left for allowing violent illegal immigrant gang members to spread across previously idyllic American communities.

That blog post - which she probably didn't even put that much thought and effort into - completely broke me mentally. I could barely even look at the screen while reading it because I knew that just a few weeks ago I probably would have left an angry comment on her blog calling her a racist, right-wing asshole and hoping that she got hit by a bus for writing something that was so blatantly ignorant and bigoted.
I had also strongly supported open borders, multiculturalism, diversity, tolerance, sanctuary cities, and amnesty. I was basically a global citizen of the world that supported a UN on steroids because I didn't think that global problems like climate change and inequality could be solved without much stronger global governance. I basically viewed nation-states as being these primitive, tribalistic relics that were enabling disease, income inequality, war, environmental destruction, and xenophobic racism.

After reading that blog post, I finally realized that my best friend's blood was on my hands because I had supported those dangerously retarded leftist policies. And I also finally realized that my leftist views were helping to completely ruin one previously serene White community after the next and sacrificing countless innocent White lives to the altar of diversity and anti-racism. I became completely radicalized against my former leftist comrades after I realized that they had taken advantage of my ignorance and innocent altruism by brainwashing me with such a dangerously suicidal and delusional ideology.

When I first left the left and joined "the dark side", I actually started out as a fucking neocon because neocons still dominated the conservative movement - and because I was reading lots of neocon journals and books as I was exploring right-wing ideology and right-wing critiques of the left. I also became an Islamophobe because I was reading Robert Spencer's Jihad Watch blog on an almost daily basis. And I even briefly became a non-Jewish Zionist because Zionist propaganda is omnipresent in the mainstream cuckservative movement, and especially in the Islamophobia community.
Robert Spencer and other Islamophobes constantly denounce racism and routinely spout the talking point that criticism of Islam has absolutely nothing to do with race; but brown- and black-skinned Muslims flooding into the White Western world and leeching off of our welfare states, filling our prisons, turning underage White girls into sex slaves, slaughtering us in terrorist attacks, aggressively shoving their way of life onto us, and openly declaring their desire to rule over us is obviously a racial issue.
That realization caused me to seek out moderate White "racialists", which is how I discovered Jared Taylor's work. The flawless logic of his arguments and his relatively moderate approach towards pro-White activism completely changed my perceptions of White nationalists. I quickly became a closeted White nationalist and race realist (I have to pretend to be a liberal in real life in order to avoid being socially ostracized). And then Richard Spencer's work impressed me back in around 2014, which caused me to join the Alt-Right.

As to the JQ; I was very close-minded and dismissive towards the JQ my entire life, even after I became a White nationalist. I basically viewed the JQ as extremely counterproductive conspiracy mongering which didn't have any merit and would only scare people away because it reeked of Nazism; but it was during a debate with a fellow White nationalist about 4 years ago where he recommended that I read Kevin MacDonald's Culture of Critique, and so I did. That's one of those paradigm-shifting books which completely transforms how you view the world. I checked his references to see if they were actually true, and I was shocked to see that they were. I'll never look at Jews or the world the same way again after reading that book.
So, yeah - that's a really long-winded explanation for why I left the left and joined the Alt-Right.

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger incels.co

[JFL] "Female Orgasm" is the reason why you're an incel

By Professor B. McGirlsex, PhD in INCELDOM (Cambridge, UK), M.B.B.S (Kings College, London, UK), BSc (Hons) (APNP)

The female orgasm is the most useless thing on the face of this earth - there is no reason for it to even exist.

* No reproductive function
* No anatomical function

Female orgasm is an evolutionary quirk and is just as useless as

* male nipples
* The appendix
* The tooth fairy
* Females in scientific fields

Foids want to LARP as men, the gender who can have an orgasm every single time they fuck.

Men can fuck a foid, fuck a fleshlight, fuck a mouth, fuck a palm(handjob) e.t.c and they cum every single time!

Meanwhile a foid can have sex for 10 years but not experience even a single orgasm. If nature wanted foids to cum it'll have made it easy for foids to orgasm - but no, its extremely difficult or even impossible for foids to reach "orgasm".

* Scientifically speaking - the only sure way for foids to orgasm is by getting brutally and savagely raped

Fuck these foid cunts - when they cant orgasm they blame men yet its their flawed biology to blame + they shouldnt be cuming in the first place!

Why the mythical non-existant foid orgasm is the reason why you are rotting in Inceldom

* The reason why foids forsake their biological imperative of mating with their looksmatch is because they chase useless things like "foid orgasm". In their warped minds goodlooking = chad = good sex = foid orgasm & ugly = incel = bad sex = no orgasm
* Countless studies and experiments and also a huge wealth of anecdotal evidence have shown that foids are ruthlessly selfish and self serving animals and only care about their pleasures - which is why they dont care that they are perpetuating inceldom at an ungodly rate and would rather chase after "orgasms" than settle for their looksmatch
* The Dogpill exists purely becase of the foids unnecessary need for orgasm. Thats why they choose a canine animal with a grotesque dick to fuck because it takes a lot to get a foid to orgasm. Dogpill almost accurately mimics and simulates rape which is why foids love the dog pill so much. The wild uncoordinated primal thrusts of a dog penis closely resembles those of a rapist thats why the dogpill is soooo appealing. In this futile search for orgasm foids bypass and over look a large number of males who inturn become incels.
* The cock carousel is very appealing to foids because they are forever chasing the elusive foid orgasm. They waste their youth and virginity whilst chasing muh orgasms and they disenfranchise their looksmatchs whilst in this trivial pursuit. These disenfranchised men become incels.

ionlycopenow #sexist #crackpot #conspiracy incels.co

Have you ever seen an anxious Chad?

Let's get this out of the way, I'm talking about real anxiety/stress, not made up foid anxiety. It's fact that these things come about over years of social neglect, abuse, isolation, etc, you cannot be constantly orbitted and validated and still be anxious

So this takes me back, whens the last time you saw a neurotic, overly nervous and stressed male who was good looking/Chad? I would bet never. I never have.

I'm sure IT type morons will spoit about muH cOmPleXiTy, (then hilariously claim nonnfacts like it being caused by low serotonin, something no study has ever confirmed, it's a meme pushed by pharma to sell harmful non helpful Jew pills) but some things are truly simpler than they seem. If you're anxious and stressed all the time as a male, you're ugly and get no pussy. It's nature putting pressure on you to do so. Sex is a natural destressor.

Yeah, I think having those things is a sign of being ugly/low smv as a male. I don't think you'll ever attractive guys who get girls have any of that.

not even once

in sophomore year of HS my 'oneitis' was dating a guy who claimed to have some anxiety order but he wasn't really an archetypal Chad and also he used to touch her right in front of me so yeah it's just foid "anxiety" like you mentioned

At best I've seen them mildly upset or disappointed when they failed an exam. That's it. That's the peak of their negative emotions

Meanwhile, cels get panic attacks over going outside, or thinking about the future or whatever. What a joke.

Anonymous #sexist desuarchive.org

your parents were normies, one was an evil female and one was an evil normie male. There's nothing to love in them and they don't love you because you're not chad even though their genes failed you. The female psych is wretched and loves the misery of the incel, of the male, it hates man but loves sadistic chads to the point of only wanting to breed with this devil archetype male. The ancient hebrews were right in their story, females love the devil and men simply want females so we are trapped in a cycle that only something like religion could control. Women are like jews though, they play both sides of an issue, they are considered a special class and try to hurt males when they can or simply exclude them from society.

Jedidiah Van Horn #sexist identitydixie.com

[From "Sexual Utopia in Power"]

It is well known to readers of this journal that white birthrates worldwide have suffered a catastrophic decline in recent decades. During this same period, ours has become assuredly the most sex-obsessed society in the history of the world. Two such massive, concurrent trends are hardly likely to be unrelated. Many well-meaning conservatives agree in deploring the present situation, but do not agree in describing that situation or how it arose. Correct diagnosis is the first precondition for effective strategy.

The well-worn phrase “sexual revolution” ought, I believe, to be taken with more than customary seriousness. Like the French Revolution, the paradigmatic political revolution of modern times, it was an attempt to realize a utopia, but a sexual rather than political utopia. And like the French Revolution, it has gone through three phases: first, a libertarian or anarchic phase in which the utopia was supposed to occur spontaneously once old ways had been swept aside; second, a reign of terror, in which one faction seized power and attempted to realize its schemes dictatorially; and third, a “reaction” in which human nature gradually reasserted itself. We shall follow this order in the present essay.

Two Utopias

Let us consider what a sexual utopia is, and let us begin with men, who are in every respect simpler.

Nature has played a trick on men: production of spermatozoa occurs at a rate several orders of magnitude greater than female ovulation (about 12 million per hour vs. 400 per lifetime). This is a natural, not a moral, fact. Among the lower animals also, the male is grossly oversupplied with something for which the female has only a limited demand. This means that the female has far greater control over mating. The universal law of nature is that males display and females choose. Male peacocks spread their tales, females choose. Male rams butt horns, females choose. Among humans, boys try to impress girls—and the girls choose. Nature dictates that in the mating dance, the male must wait to be chosen.

A man’s sexual utopia is, accordingly, a world in which no such limit to female demand for him exists. It is not necessary to resort to pornography for example. Consider only popular movies aimed at a male audience, such as the James Bond series. Women simply cannot resist James Bond. He does not have to propose marriage, or even request dates. He simply walks into the room and they swoon. The entertainment industry turns out endless images such as this. Why, the male viewer eventually may ask, cannot life actually be so? To some, it is tempting to put the blame on the institution of marriage.

Marriage, after all, seems to restrict sex rather drastically. Certain men figure that if sex were permitted both inside and outside of marriage there would have to be twice as much sex as formerly. They imagined there existed a large, untapped reservoir of female desire hitherto repressed by monogamy. To release it, they sought, during the early postwar period, to replace the seventh commandment with an endorsement of all sexual activity between “consenting adults.” Every man could have a harem. Sexual behavior in general, and not merely family life, was henceforward to be regarded as a private matter. Traditionalists who disagreed were said to want to “put a policeman in every bedroom.” This was the age of the Kinsey Reports and the first appearance of Playboy magazine. Idle male daydreams had become a social movement.

This characteristically male sexual utopianism of the early postwar years was a forerunner of the sexual revolution but not the revolution itself. Men are incapable of bringing about revolutionary changes in heterosexual relations without the cooperation—the famed “consent”—of women. But the original male would-be revolutionaries did not understand the nature of the female sex instinct. That is why things have not gone according to their plan.

What is the special character of feminine sexual desire that distinguishes it from that of men?

It is sometimes said that men are polygamous and women monogamous. Such a belief is often implicit in the writings of “conservative” male commentators: Women only want good husbands, but heartless men use and abandon them. Some evidence does appear, prima facie, to support such a view. One 1994 survey found that “while men projected they would ideally like 6 sex partners over the next year, and 8 over the next two years, women responded that their ideal would be to have only one partner over the next year. And over two years? The answer, for women, was still one.”[1] Is this not evidence that women are naturally monogamous?

No, it is not. Women know their own sexual urges are unruly, but traditionally have had enough sense to keep quiet about it. A husband’s belief that his wife is naturally monogamous makes for his own peace of mind. It is not to a wife’s advantage, either, that her husband understand her too well: Knowledge is power. In short, we have here a kind of Platonic “noble lie”—a belief which is salutary, although false.

It would be more accurate to say that the female sexual instinct is hypergamous. Men may have a tendency to seek sexual variety, but women have simple tastes in the manner of Oscar Wilde: They are always satisfied with the best. By definition, only one man can be the best. These different male and female “sexual orientations” are clearly seen among the lower primates, e.g., in a baboon pack. Females compete to mate at the top, males to get to the top.

Women, in fact, have a distinctive sexual utopia corresponding to their hypergamous instincts. In its purely utopian form, it has two parts: First, she mates with her incubus, the imaginary perfect man; and, second, he “commits,” or ceases mating with all other women. This is the formula of much pulp romance fiction. The fantasy is strictly utopian, partly because no perfect man exists, but partly also because even if he did, it is logically impossible for him to be the exclusive mate of all the women who desire him.

It is possible, however, to enable women to mate hypergamously, i.e., with the most sexually attractive (handsome or socially dominant) men. In the Ecclesiazusae of Aristophanes the women of Athens stage a coup d’état. They occupy the legislative assembly and barricade their husbands out. Then they proceed to enact a law by which the most attractive males of the city will be compelled to mate with each female in turn, beginning with the least attractive. That is the female sexual utopia in power. Aristophanes had a better understanding of the female mind than the average husband.

[...]

Fallout of the Revolution: “Date Rape”

A few years into the sexual revolution, shocking reports began to appear of vast numbers of young women—from one quarter to half—being victims of rape. Shock turned to bewilderment when the victims were brought forward to tell their stories. The “rapists,” it turns out, were never lying in wait for them in remote corners, were not armed, did not attack them. Instead, these “date rapes” occur in private places, usually college dormitory rooms, and involve no threats or violence. In fact, they little resemble what most of us think of as rape.

What was going on here?

Take a girl too young to understand what erotic desire is and subject her to several years of propaganda to the effect that she has a right to have things any way she wants them in this domain—with no corresponding duties to God, her parents, or anyone else. Do not give her any guidance as to what it might be good for her to want, how she might try to regulate her own conduct, or what qualities she ought to look for in a young man. Teach her furthermore that the notion of natural differences between the sexes is a laughable superstition that our enlightened age is gradually overcoming—with the implication that men’s sexual desires are no different from or more intense than her own. Meanwhile, as she matures physically, keep her protected in her parents’ house, sheltered from responsibility.

Then, at age seventeen or eighteen, take her suddenly away from her family and all the people she has ever known. She can stay up as late as she wants! She can decide for herself when and how much to study! She’s making new friends all the time, young women and men both. It’s no big deal having them over or going to their rooms; everybody is perfectly casual about it. What difference does it make if it’s a boy she met at a party? He seems like a nice fellow, like others she meets in class.

Now let us consider the young man she is alone with. He is neither a saint nor a criminal, but, like all normal young men of college years, he is intensely interested in sex. There are times he cannot study without getting distracted by the thought of some young woman’s body. He has had little real experience with girls, and most of that unhappy. He has been rejected a few times with little ceremony, and it was more humiliating than he cares to admit. He has the impression that for other young men things are not as difficult: “Everybody knows,” after all, that since the 1960s men get all the sex they like, right? He is bombarded with talk about sex on television, in the words to popular songs, in rumors about friends who supposedly “scored” with this or that girl. He begins to wonder if there isn’t something wrong with him.

Furthermore, he has received the same education about sex as the girl he is now with. He has learned that people have the right to do anything they want. The only exception is rape. But that is hardly even relevant to him; he is obviously incapable of doing something like that.

Raymond Kidwell #racist disqus.com

[Commenting on AmRen’s review of “Race Differences in Psychopathic Personality: An Evolutionary Analysis”, a new book by Richard Lynn, the author of “The Bell Curve”]

I think psychopathy is a misnomer. Different races and ethnic groups have different instincts. In many cases its neither good nor bad, sometimes it affects group success or individual success. As an example, many online white nationalists will accuse "Jews" of being psychopaths, other people claim that psychopaths rise to the top of society and control the world. Neither one is accurate.

Ashkenazim tend to be more aggressive than your typical white European. They have chutzpah. They are more likely to aggressively fight for their self interests, both as individuals and as a group. A typical European may find this off putting or perhaps respectable, but its different. Of course individuals within a group vary- not all Jews are stereotypical of their group, and so on with other groups. By contrast I think the average European is too docile. They let themselves get used and abused. This explains the huge difference between Israel and European nations. Israel is a little too aggressive to non-Jews. Europe is far too accommodating.

Similarly you have differences in mating or social behavior. Polygamy and multiple sexual partners seems to be the norm in every black community across the world (other than maybe upper class blacks in a predominately white community). At the same time many white people who have tried "free love" in the hippy movement decided its not for them and they are more interested in having a single partner. Not every person conforms to a stereotype, but generally the instincts and inclinations of different races vary. But to call one group "psychopaths" and another "normal" its not really accurate.

It is true that there is a difference in altruism. European whites tend to be the most altruistic group which makes white communities generally more desirable to live in than others. By Altruism I mean a basic concern for other people, compassion, non-criminality etc.

When I delivered food for a living I saw the clear difference- even in a wealthy neighborhood where everyone has the same wealth and same cultural background there is a gigantic difference in tips. White people tip well. They gladly help others without asking for some immediate gain. There may be individual exceptions but you can clearly see altruistic behavior in a white community. Black people were the lowest- many of them tip very badly to the point where if there are a lot of blacks in the community the business is forced to charge the tip as part of the bill. Jews tend to tip the minimal. They don't want to leave a lousy tip and look bad in front of others, but they also don't want to be too generous- so they'll usually tip whatever is considered normal (like 10% or whatever) but never anything super generous. Indians from India are almost on the same level as blacks, but may care a little bit more of what others think of them. Asians are somewhere between Jews and whites.

All these little "instincts" add up to vastly different societies or communities- and different social institutions. One example: East Asian societies are plagued by authoritarianism. A major reason for this is Asians tend to be very docile and compliant (somewhat ironic that this leads to strong armed governments). In this case I.Q. doesn't account for the vast difference between a typical white community (which is more democratic) and a typical East Asian one (more authoritarian) nearly all the difference relates to instincts. Although you can see if the conditions are right Asians can maintain a democracy but it tends to slide towards authoritarianism if there are no whites to object, because there is not a lot of opposition to power grabbing. Jewish societies are the opposite. Ask two Jews a question and you get three opinions. It would be nearly impossible to maintain authoritarian rule over a predominately Jewish community (at least in the long term wouldn't work). I think "instincts" is a better word than sociopathy. In this case altruistic instinct would more specifically describe what we are observing.

Consoleman and Kominam #racist koreansentry.com

(Consoleman): This is Japan, so why Japan is allowed to host Olympic? Also, why Koreans are still visiting that dirty place? It's not only unsafe for foreigners but riddled with radiation and Yakuza gangsters and Right-wing Japs. Korean government better have contingency plan to bring back all Koreans from Japan as there could be next major earthquakes, tsunami, and even violent riots that could leave thousands of dead Koreans just like Kanto earthquake's massacre of Koreans in 1930s. Japs are savages and no wonder they're recorded as sub-humans in most ancient Asian records. Back in 10th~16th centuries, Japan was like Somalia and Syria where extremists ran the country like warlords.

(kominam): It's Japanese character to be indiscriminately coward towards the elderly, children, women. Let's see if they are capable towards the men.
Don't forget the incident of the Korean woman fighter being beaten by Jap entertainers on Jap TV, actress Jun Ji Hyun being humiliated during
the interview by the male host many years ago on Jap TV, and many other things like this. Hell, I've been dealing with these Japs since I lived in
S. America since I was a child where there are more Japs than in the US, so the typical Jap character is nothing alien to me.

Lord Jim #racist stormfront.org

Consider this . . .

Here, in the 21st century, with its wealth of technology so marvelous they would be considered just a mere 100 years ago; of knowledge so freely available it staggers the imagination; social assistance systems of incredible altruism

Yet, with all our technology, all our knowledge, all our help, Negroes still continue globally fail advance beyond their neolithic barbarism. Even when advances are bestowed upon them, they will quickly revert to a more primitive existence unless force is applied, and then only so long as force exists.
Why such endeavors be successful in a past bereft of such social entitlement programs, civil rights favoritism, and the restriction of knowledge to nobility (and other privileged classes).

How could Egypt and India prevent this when we, with all our technology and knowledge could not?

No, they were swamped and dragged them down into violent barbarism the same as we see globally now.
We have the same urban areas of negro dominated slums, ghettos, ruins filled with some of the most violent, blood thirsty, savage, feral creatures to ever stride the planet. Our nations are walking down the same path of negro dominated barbarism as Egypt and India.

Let us hope our descendants will remember these words:

Beware the negro, for he is the Devil's pawn. He kills for sport or lust or greed. Yea, he will murder his brother to possess his brother's land. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a ruin of his home and yours. Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death.

Total Imbecile #sexist incels.co

Why are there so few of us on r/introvert? Women cant be introverted ffs

I just discovered this sub a few weeks ago and while I can relate to some posts seeing women post is fucking filling me with rage. Women cant be introverted, every woman is a social god because people (especially guys) just throw themselves to help them become sociable, and even if theyre awkward because they are female nobody cares. Women for whatever reason are immune to autism and enjoy attentionwhoring, theyre extroverted as fuck, introverted women are not real, its not a thing, they need attention to live

Now it shouldnt surprise anyone that on this sub most posts from guys are about being incel while your typical post from a female as you would expect goes something like this (legit example):
>How introverted is too introverted?
>I (24/F) have been an introvert all my life.

Next sentence:
>my boyfriend

Scorpio3.14 #racist forums.narutofan.com

Slavery. African Americans benifited from this, greater society did not. The southern economy was devistated for years and years afterwards. Not to mention the thousands of people who died in the civil war which was, in part, a result of trying to make slavery illegal. It was a good thing that we ended slavery, but it was not good for the society. According to what you are saying, we shouldnt have ended slavery.

HighTGymcel #sexist #fundie #psycho incels.co

Women are evil satanic creatures who dont deserve a free life!!!

It makes my blood boil none of them ever gave me a chance or even looked at me.
They hate me, they want me dead.
But if they need my help I will not look at them like they didnt look at me.
Women are such sick, wicked, cancerous animals they should be put into cages and fed with animal food. They dont deserve the freedom which men fought for. They wont even give us love, affection and sex.
In my opinion every war veteran who is a virgin should have the option to kill a foid for not fucking him. Females should go after their primary function which is making babies and this with any healthy male who will give her love. But they abonded their nature they are demons send from the devil to make us do bad things they are satans children. We shouldnt fall for their wicked tricks. Soon they will be whipped and go to hell.
Thats also why witches were all women and they were killed which was right.

Rookh Kshatriya #sexist kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com

The Ineffable Mystery of Anglo Hypergamy

Because of the puritanical fictions that prevail in Anglo-American society, Anglo women have become impossible to please by rational means. As with Christian morality (a behavioural system intimately associated with Anglo feminism), the bar has been set impossibly high. The outcome is either misandrist spinsterhood or, more often, what we see around us: a female obsession with the dregs of the male sex. Oddly, this bizarre paradox makes sense. If no male is good enough for the Anglobitch, then rational scales of differentiation no longer apply.

This is the problem with Game and its ‘Greek’ system of male classification. The specific nature of Anglo-American hypergamy derives from a puritanical archetype, removing it from all rational rules of hierarchical classification. Since no male is good enough for her, all men are flattened into an undifferentiated, priapic horde in the Anglo female’s mind. A king is a jack is a joker… a classical scholar at Yale is suddenly no better than a murderous baboon like Charles Manson. An illiterate tramp with a ring through his nose instantly acquires the same standing as an architect, physicist or surgeon.

And this explains why exponents of Game report no special mating success in the Anglo-American world. All their 'Alpha' striving is meaningless in a misandrist culture where male status has been downgraded to untermensch levels. While men believe in such classification systems, they have no meaning to Anglo women whatsoever. Similarly, if all women were facially mutilated at birth and forced to wear sackcloth and ashes, we would have no way to differentiate them: and with no woman higher than a four, no female hierarchy of sexual appeal could exist. Or course, most feminists would rather like that, too.

And this is what makes Game – so appealing to the logical male mind – so ineffective in the Anglosphere. Misandrist women cannot distinguish between Nobel Prize winners and tattooed psychopaths – all are men and thus worthless brutes in their entitled eyes. And so all the Gamers’ striving for 'Alpha' status is pointless – they might as well stick rings through their noses, grow some dreadlocks and slouch the streets scratching their butts. Indeed, as many North American commentators claim, their mating chances would probably improve if they did this. ‘Omega males’ doubtless confirm the Anglo female’s contempt for men in general. If she has to have a man, only the worst knave will do.

Gamers are wrong about Anglo women. Socons are, too. Writers like Daniel Amneus consider female hypergamy to be the ‘glue’ that binds male consent to the social order. That might make sense in less repressive cultural settings. In the Anglosphere, however, rational female hypergamy has short-circuited due to our cultural bloc’s uniquely puritanical socio-moral conditions. While alphas and high betas trudge home to empty beds or divorce threats, tramps and mass-murderers wade through tons of female flesh without breaking sweat. And so the Anglosphere falls apart around our ears. Yet still David Futrelle exhorts us all to ‘respect women’ and be ‘nice’.

Go figure.

Marina Orwell #racist orwellsdaughter.wordpress.com

Talentless Nonwhites Made Rich from Hating White People

Please feel free to send me suggestions. As a media dropout, I don’t encounter brown cunts who make money from hating White women as most other people do.

(On a photo of Amy Schumer)
Fat, Talentless Jewess Who “Made It” Via her Tribe’s Relentless Nepotism Encourages Women to Join Jews as Treasonous Bitches

“Join me in my Walk O Treason, Biatches! I’m a fat dual citizen with zero talent making millions due to my tribe’s nepotism. But that’s not enough. I just can’t call myself a true kike unless I oppose White people. We jews are, after all, rattlesnakes. Join me — I promis free pizza & other high calorie food! After all, we may burn 80 calories during our ‘walk!'”

(On Paz de la Huerta)
Racist Brown Cunt is Painted White from Head to Toe in order to Make Fun of White Women
First up is the dispicable latrino cunt, Paz de la Huerta.

This brown whore is butt ugly despite rhinoplasty (probably more than one), lip injections (as if this part negroid Thang needed it), boob jobs (probably more than 2), and enough paint to redo the “white” house in the appropriate color: negroid caca brown.

This particular whore (just look at what an empty sack of evil shit she is) actually made a ton of money letting the kike jews paint her entirely “white,” wear colored contact lenses, and wear a red wig — all to pantomime White women & aid the kikes in their destruction of White women. She deserves to be beaten to a bloody pulp and flayed spread eagle on a cross while White women urinate on her. May you die as you have lived, vicious latrino cunt Paz de la Huerta.

Brown whore Paz de la Huerta was happy to oblige with kikenstein’s neverending project of debasing White women. After all, Ms. Baboon is quite hideous “as is” even despite massive face spackle – so she quite enjoyed being uber-paid for encouraging the abuse of beautiful White women. This vicious latrino prostitute agreed to be painted “white” from head to toe, wore colored contact lenses, & to wear a red wig while screaming for granddaddy to rape her more — meanwhile her boob-jobbed chest bounced for the gratification of males of all races. (Her rhinoplasty is even more poorly-done than her/its boob job(s), but the “white” male is the most credulous creature known to kikekind so they just get more audacious with their fake-itude).

Dota #fundie occidentinvicta.com

Misconception 1: I have an inferiority complex

I’ve gotten this hurled at me so many times that it’s time to address this once and for all. I do not have an inferiority complex with regards to whites. I am their equal, morally and intellectually. I firmly reject racism because I sincerely believe in the equality of all men. This is a composite belief that is comprised of several fundamental beliefs, chief amoung which is the existence of God (The Abrahamic God, ie the only true God). We are all equal in His eyes. Genuine racists believe that certain groups are inherently superior or inferior depending on the group’s contribution to civilization over time. I do not share this belief. I believe all people are inherently equal in worth regardless of how much or how little their respective groups have contributed to the pool of human knowledge. This is my personal belief .

Having said this, I don’t believe that all cultures are equal. God created man, but not culture. Culture is man-made and synthetic works vary in quality. Just because we are all equal doesn’t mean that racially diverse groups can live together in some sort of leftist utopia. Racially diverse societies will only endure within the cultural hegemony of one dominant group. Certain cultural values are so alien to others such that forcing diverse groups who practice these cultures to reside in close proximity constitutes an act of cruelty. Respecting borders is about respecting culture. The act of erecting a border sends a clear message to one’s neighbours that they are free to practice their way of life in their corner of the world, free from persecution and judgement, just as one is entitled to the same prerogatives within one’s own borders.

Misconception 2: Whites are inherently special

I never said that whites were somehow special on account of their genetics or nature. I’ve always stated that Western culture is unique and ought to be preserved. The only way this can be done is to ensure that they remain a majority in their own nations. If you wish for America and Canada to continue being great, then it is logical to ensure that the people who created these nations continue running them. Why is this view so outlandish? If China is to remain Chinese, then shouldn’t the Chinese be the majority there? So why can’t whites be a majority in the US and Canada?

Misconception 3: Non-whites are incapable of altruism

"All groups are capable of both hospitality and savagery if the conditions are right. I think Dota is really overgeneralizing. There are many parts of the third world where one will be treated with the utmost hospitality and some will will give you the shirt off their back."

I never said that non-whites were completely devoid of altruistic instincts. I have seen individual acts of kindness in South and South East Asia, and even the Middle East. The point I was trying to make is that Western society is humane. The compassion one encounters in the West is collectively organized. You won’t see things like homeless shelters and soup kitchens in non western countries. You’ll never see an Indian or Chinese equivalent of the YMCA and other organizations that exist solely to improve quality of life. This is insaniyat on a scale that is unimaginable in the non-western world.

The second point I wish to make is that while while many non-westerners are kind and hospitable to tourists, how hospitable would they be if those tourists remained and became citizens? I’ve read numerous accounts by Black tourists who have spoken glowingly about Korean courtesy. How courteous would these Koreans be if blacks were 20% of their population? How would they react when Blacks made a move on their women?

Bay Area Guy is essentially correct when he says that kindness to tourists comes easily since they are merely passing through. The US and Canada allow non-whites to settle in their nations and even grant them access to their highest institutions. Yet despite these gestures, they get nothing but grievance mongering and endless whining from minorities.

Misconception 4: White values will survive white extinction

"Also many non-whites born and raised in America have the same sort of outlook on hospitality and civility that whites do."

What Tulio writes is true, but he underestimates the power of tribalism on non-whites and I don’t blame him. Liberalism provides a most effective cover for tribalism as the Jews have demonstrated and as non-whites have themselves discovered. It allows them to cloak their group interests under universalist terms like “egalitarianism” and “tolerance” knowing fully well the effect that moral universalism has on whites. The true test of a group’s liberalism lies in how they behave not when they are a minority, but when they are a majority. So while the Jew and Indian eloquently argue for tolerance and inclusion in North America, they seldom practice those virtues in India and Israel where they are in charge.

Tulio also fails to realize that democracy and and tribalism are incompatible on the most fundamental level. That tribal interests reduce democracy to nothing but vote bank politics. It is completely ludicrous to think that Indians, Chinese, Koreans, Blacks, and Hispanics will somehow see beyond their racial identities and embrace each other as fellow Americans. Hell, every university in North America has a plethora of ethnic and religious associations that that reflect the demographic composition of their student body.

Would Indians, who so fiercely resist affirmative action favouring Dalits back home, somehow show blacks more compassion? Would Hispanics overlook racial identity when fiercely competing with blacks for blue collar jobs? A racially diverse America where groups compete fiercely for scarce resources (thanks to a declining economy) will not produce a very humane society. This has been said before but it needs to be said again: A first world nation cannot be sustained by a third world population.

Maryann White #fundie ndsmcobserver.com

I’ve thought about writing this letter for a long time. I waited, hoping that fashions would change and such a letter would be unnecessary — but that doesn’t seem to be happening. I’m not trying to insult anyone or infringe upon anyone’s rights. I’m just a Catholic mother of four sons with a problem that only girls can solve: leggings.

The emergence of leggings as pants some years ago baffled me. They’re such an unforgiving garment. Last fall, they obtruded painfully on my landscape. I was at Mass at the Basilica with my family. In front of us was a group of young women, all wearing very snug-fitting leggings and all wearing short-waisted tops (so that the lower body was uncovered except for the leggings). Some of them truly looked as though the leggings had been painted on them.

A world in which women continue to be depicted as “babes” by movies, video games, music videos, etc. makes it hard on Catholic mothers to teach their sons that women are someone’s daughters and sisters. That women should be viewed first as people — and all people should be considered with respect.

I talk to my sons about Princess Leia and how Jabba the Hutt tried to steal her personhood by putting her into a slave girl outfit in which her body became the focus. (That’s the only scene in the whole franchise in which Leia appears in such a way — and it’s forced upon her.)

Leggings are hardly slave girl outfits. And no one is forcing them on the countless young women who wear them. But I wonder why no one thinks it’s strange that the fashion industry has caused women to voluntarily expose their nether regions in this way. I was ashamed for the young women at Mass. I thought of all the other men around and behind us who couldn’t help but see their behinds. My sons know better than to ogle a woman’s body — certainly when I’m around (and hopefully, also when I’m not). They didn’t stare, and they didn’t comment afterwards. But you couldn’t help but see those blackly naked rear ends. I didn’t want to see them — but they were unavoidable. How much more difficult for young guys to ignore them.

I’ve heard women say that they like leggings because they’re “comfortable.” So are pajamas. So is nakedness. And the human body is a beautiful thing. But we don’t go around naked because we respect ourselves — we want to be seen as a person, not a body (like slave-girl Leia). We don’t go naked because we respect the other people who must see us, whether they would or not. These are not just my sons — they’re the fathers and brothers of your friends, the male students in your classes, the men of every variety who visit campus. I’m fretting both because of unsavory guys who are looking at you creepily and nice guys who are doing everything to avoid looking at you. For the Catholic mothers who want to find a blanket to lovingly cover your nakedness and protect you — and to find scarves to tie over the eyes of their sons to protect them from you!

Leggings are so naked, so form fitting, so exposing. Could you think of the mothers of sons the next time you go shopping and consider choosing jeans instead? Let Notre Dame girls be the first to turn their backs(ides) on leggings. You have every right to wear them. But you have every right to choose not to. Thanks for listening to the lecture. Catholic moms are good at those!

secondtidalwave2 #sexist reddit.com

Isnt that just dreadful. So women won't be helped, because of transwomen and their endless selfishness. I want to know, if transwomen are women, when they will start behaving like women, and start giving support, instead of just demanding it? I remember a lesbian saying, there was a rally and afterwards, it was the women doing the cleaning up, while the gay men and the transwomen sat about and chatted. Requests for assistance were refused, because 'they arent that kind of woman".

It made me so angry. They see real women as drudges, child-bearers and themselves as glamour pusses, and like any misogynist, they assign more value to the latter. And furthermore, if you get 'misgendered' it shouldnt bother you. If your identity as so strong the law needs to be changed to accommodate you, then surely, its strong enough to ignore misgendering. Plus, if the ones who are completely male-bodied are really women, they would use male toilets...because women care about other women's safety.

They can use a male toilet in safety, they should do so, so that men cant pretend to be trans..or so toilets wont be made gender-neutral. Its what women would do...and where did transwomen used to go, before all this? they went right beside us and we didnt notice, because they were really trans and coded female. And now, they are complaining that the Women Weinstein assaulted are 'marginalizing' them by speaking up. They are actually say the me too hashtag is transphobic, because they dont get harassed and it would validate them if they did. so therefore..what? women should shut up?

Ferdinand Bardamu #racist eurocanadian.ca

The White race’s intelligence and behavior has been under intense selective pressure since late medieval times. These new environmental forces significantly increased White resilience in the face of adversity. The first of these was the Black Death that ravaged Europe from 1347 to 1351. As one of the most catastrophic pandemics in world history, it killed off one-third of Europe’s population. The evidence of bioarchaeology, drawn from skeletal analysis of burial remains from “Black Death” cemeteries, reveals that far from being random, the plague was very selective in its choice of victims (DeWitte, 2014). The weak and the elderly were at increased risk of infection. Given the strong correlation between poor health and IQ, the Whites who survived were much stronger, healthier and smarter than ever before. The dearth of peasant labor led to an increase in wages, rising living standards and the invention of labor-saving devices. This greater wealth and prosperity liberated many from the common drudgery of daily life. A century after the Black Death, the Renaissance scaled even greater heights of intellectual and artistic achievement.

The 17th century colonization of North America also subjected Whites to strong selective pressure. The first Englishmen to have disembarked on American soil had survived religious persecution in England as Puritans objecting to the “Roman idolatry” of Anglican ritual; they had survived the perilous transAtlantic voyage, unaffected by typhus or scurvy. In New England, the Puritans still had to contend with disease, the harsh winters and the “merciless Indian savages” that lay hiding in the primeval forests of the eastern seaboard. If the weak and unintelligent managed to survive the voyage, they would eventually be killed off by starvation or Indian tomahawk. This pattern of eugenic selection affected all English settlers, including those motivated by purely secular and commercial interests. By the end of the colonial period, the Anglo-Saxon in the Americas had emerged as one of the finest and most evolved specimens of the White race.

The purifying effects of eugenic selection had rapidly accelerated the evolution of Homo sapiens in Europe and North America: the fittest White men had always left behind the most offspring, but after the ravages of bubonic plague and the hardships of American colonization, their broods became larger, healthier and more intelligent. White men of lesser ability, if they were lucky enough to find mates, typically left behind few descendants, with fewer still managing to survive past childhood.

A significant increase in the population of intelligent Whites inevitably led to a rising per capita rate of innovation. This peaked in 1873, during the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901), but declined rapidly after that (Huebner, 2005). With the new science and technology, the White man was able to raise incomes, improve public health and increase longevity across the Western world. Eugenic selection for higher IQ made it possible for the White man to develop more sophisticated military technology. This far surpassed anything that had ever been developed by the ancient Greeks and Romans or even non-Whites. By century’s end, approximately 84% of the earth’s surface was controlled by the colonial empires of Western Europe. Intellectual and creative development had scaled such heights that Europe even gave birth to a race of intellectual supermen. These were the Victorian polymaths, who numbered among their ranks the colorful Sir Richard Francis Burton (1821-1890). He was a man who excelled at every subject that commanded his undivided attention. He was a brilliant writer, scholar, explorer, geographer, translator, diplomat and swordsman. A master linguist, he spoke an astonishing 40 languages and dialects fluently. This period of continuous White evolutionary development wasn’t to last forever. By 1914, the golden age of White intellectual and creative superiority had come to an end.

II: Western Intellectual Decline from Late 19th Century to Present

The general intelligence of the Western industrialized nations has declined since late 19th century, according to a meta-analysis of over a dozen reaction time (RT) studies. A cognitive, but not an economic or thermodynamic, limit has apparently been reached. There are now fewer individuals with the intelligence to solve complex mathematical and engineering problems, which is why the rate of innovation has significantly decreased since 1873. “Genetic g” - g-factor in the absence of gene environment interaction - has decreased by 14 IQ points over the course of a century, at least in the Anglophone nations of the UK, USA, Canada and Australia. This means a decrease of 1.23 IQ points per decade (Woodley et al., 2013). To eliminate the possibility of overinflated RT latencies because of hardware and software lags (Woods et al., 2015), the meta-analytic findings were adjusted for lag time. The result was that the Victorians were still faster (and smarter) than modern Western populations (Woodley et al., 2015).

Measures of vocabulary, relatively insensitive to environmental influence because of greater overall gsaturation and heritability rate, provided additional evidence of superior Victorian intelligence. A study tracked WORDSUM item frequencies over the course of 150 years. For this, a database that stored 5.9 million texts from the 1500s to the present was used. The most difficult and therefore the most highly g-loaded WORDSUM items exhibited sharper declines in historical usage since mid-19th century, consistent with declines in “genetic g” observed among Western populations (Woodley et al., 2015).

After decades of “massive IQ gains,” cognitive reversals were observed in Norway (Sundet et al, 2004), Denmark (Teasdale & Owen, 2008), the Netherlands (Woodley & Meisenberg, 2013) and elsewhere. In one study, genes associated with educational attainment and cognitive ability had declined in frequency across birth cohorts in an Icelandic population. It was estimated that a loss of 0.3 IQ points per decade would substantially affect Iceland if allowed to continue for centuries (Kong et al., 2017). James Flynn, discoverer of the eponymous Flynn effect, has acknowledged the reversal of cognitive gains in certain Western countries, especially those of Scandinavia. At a 2017 conference hosted by the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR), he admitted: “I have no doubt that there has been some deterioration of genetic quality for intelligence since late Victorian times.” Flynn has projected substantial losses of about 6 or even 7 IQ points for Scandinavia over a 30 year period. Such a reversal in intelligence would have catastrophic effects on the societies and economies of Scandinavia, now being flooded by hostile elites with Third World “migrants.”

A relevant question is: “If the post-WWII consensus acknowledges the existence of massive IQ gains over the last century, how does one explain cognitive reversal in the most industrialized nations?” This phenomenon is known as Cattell’s paradox and its solution is Woodley’s co-occurrence model. Although phenotypic intelligence has increased since WWII, genotypic intelligence has decreased. The anti-Flynn effect is really a “Jensen effect” because it has resulted in losses on psychometric g.

III: The Role of Dysgenic Selection in Western Intellectual Decline

Mass “immigration” from low-IQ regions of the globe, such as the Middle East, South Asia and Africa, have no doubt contributed to declines in the average intelligence of the West. In one recent study (Woodley et al., 2017), Third World “immigration” was associated with IQ declines in 13 different nations. High levels of Third World “immigration” are always significant predictors of Western cognitive decline; its most pronounced effects are on IQ subtest batteries with the highest g-loadings. Nevertheless, Third World “immigration” does not fully account for dysgenic selection among Western populations. Declines in genotypic intelligence occurred long before the advent of Third World “immigration,” which only partially explains the Western world’s declining IQ.

The greater fecundity of intelligent Whites, compared to the unintelligent, had always been the norm, especially since the 1400s. This changed during the Industrial Revolution; more intelligent Whites delayed having children until later in life, through a combination of abstinence and contraception, to further their educational aspirations and develop their innate potential. Medical breakthroughs significantly improved general health and nutrition, which prolonged human lifespans. This allowed less intelligent Whites to survive childhood and have significantly more children than those who were more intelligent. The rise of social welfare liberalism in the 20th century merely exacerbated this trend. As Western governments progressively taxed their wealthiest and most intelligent citizens, their wealth was unfortunately redistributed to less industrious and less intelligent members of the White race, who squandered the money as they multiplied recklessly.

More recent studies have shed further light on the negative correlation between intelligence and fertility. In one study, the higher the intelligence and socioeconomic status of adolescents, the lower their likelihood of having offspring. This dysgenic effect was more true of females than males, indicating that women become choosier the more wealth and status they accumulate (Reeve et al., 2013). Among adults, a negative correlation between intelligence and odds of parenthood was discovered; every 15 point increase in a woman’s childhood IQ would decrease a woman’s odds of parenthood by about 20% (Kanazawa, 2014). The female role in the transmission of intelligence is a substantial one because the genes for intelligence are X-chromosomal; if more intelligent women since the late Victorian period have had less children than the unintelligent, one can only expect a gradual decline in the national intelligence of Western populations.

Analysis of a large genealogical database revealed that Iceland’s national IQ had decreased over time because more intelligent Icelanders were having less children. Although IQ declines per decade were small, statistical significance is attained when viewed from an evolutionary timescale. Dysgenic fertility may potentially undermine Icelandic economy and society within a few centuries, unless it is reversed (Kong et al., 2017). Polygenic scores, which capture selection against g (such as dysgenic fertility or “immigration”), are the most significant predictors of the century-long decline in “heritable g” (Woodley et al., 2018). The “neurotoxin hypothesis,” like all environmental explanations, fails to adequately predict temporal trends in general intelligence because cognitive ability is under much stronger genetic than environmental control. The worst environmental deprivations (i.e. severe malnutrition) or the most costly and ambitious environmental interventions rarely, if ever have a lasting effect on heritable g.

Most experts in intelligence, cognitive ability and student achievement now attribute the anti-Flynn effect to dysgenic fertility, Third World “immigration” and worsening educational standards in Western countries; in contrast, they are far more unanimous among each other in attributing environmental causation to the Flynn effect, in striking agreement with Woodley’s co-occurrence model (Rindermann et al., 2016). Based on the evidence, Western intellectual decline is largely caused by a negative IQfertility gradient, with Third World “immigration” becoming an increasingly significant contributor as time goes on.

IV: The Road to “Idiocracy”

Nobel laureate William Shockley proposed a Voluntary Sterilization Bonus Plan (1972). He presented this as a “thought experiment.” This would be open to all members of the American public, regardless of “sex, race or welfare status.” For each IQ point under 100, the recipient was to be given $1000, as long as he or she was willing to undergo vasectomy or tubal ligation. This was not an original proposal, as it had been first suggested over 40 years ago by American journalist and scholar H.L. Mencken, albeit in a rather humorous context. What all of these proposals neglect, and what modern eugenicists have failed to acknowledge, is the obvious sex differential in contributions to dysgenic fertility, probably because of the natural sympathy that men typically have for the opposite sex.

The low-IQ male, unless he is among the 20% of males considered physically attractive, is permanently excluded from the sexual market. This is because of his lifelong inability to acquire the material resources that allow him to compensate for his genetic inferiority. On the other hand, the low-IQ female poses a far greater threat to the mental hygiene of Western populations, by virtue of her role as sexual selector. For the low-IQ female, there will always be large numbers of reasonably attractive males willing to satisfy her many sexual and financial needs. If the low-IQ male must be handsome or rich, the low-IQ female must only be of childbearing age if she wishes to attract a mate of fairly decent genetic quality. The Industrial Revolution brought with it substantial improvements in public health and nutrition, making it easier for low-IQ females to survive childhood, only to breed as much as possible throughout their reproductive years.

When, in 1869, Sir Francis Galton made his famous scientific prediction of declining Western intelligence based on anecdotal observation of changing Victorian demographics, what he really observed was more low-IQ females than ever before surviving childhood to satisfy their instinctive desire for maternity. This trend has continued without interruption to the present, making low-IQ females the primary driving force behind the dysgenic fertility that has resulted in declining general intelligence in Western industrialized nations. No successful eugenic policy can exist without taking this into full account. In order for Dr. Shockley’s proposal to have made any sense from an evolutionary perspective, the bonus for females should have been quadrupled or even quintupled for each IQ point under 100.

Into this volatile mixture was added feminism, a pernicious ideology that grants both unrestricted individual autonomy and reproductive choice to women who should not be allowed to breed for eugenic reasons. In recognizing that all women have the same rights, feminism reveals itself to be just as dangerous as the Third World “immigration” promoted by hostile elites. By encouraging low-IQ females to engage in promiscuity, march in “slut walks,” wear “pussy hats,” and breed prolifically - while high-IQ females delay parenthood because of their educational aspirations - feminism has merely accelerated the decline in general intelligence among Western populations, already well under way since the Industrial Revolution. As Whites get dumber, their “Western uniqueness,” including their high intelligence, creativity and ability to produce more geniuses than any other race of people, will disappear with them. This radical transformation of the underlying genetic structure of Western populations could take place within less than a 100 years. Few people recognize the fragility of Western intellectual gains because of selective pressures exerted by the Black Death in Medieval Europe and the 17th century colonization of North America. By undermining Western mental and racial hygiene, feminism threatens to return Whites to the way things were before the agricultural revolution of the Neolithic age.

Helmuth Nyborg, extrapolating from present trends and projecting them into the future, allows us to better visualize in concrete terms the post-apocalyptic scenario that awaits Western civilization (2011). He shows what happens when a racially homogeneous society like Denmark, with a population of over 5 million, is subjected to both “Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (IRDS), referring to the preservation and multiplication of the genetically disadvantaged, and “External Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (ERDS), in reference to “super-fertile” Third World “replacement migration.”

When both internal and external relaxation are combined, “Double Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (DRDS) is produced, a clear and unobstructed path to Western “idiocracy” in Denmark. By 2072, ethnic Danes will be reduced to 60% of the population, from a high of 97% in 1979; minority status will be reached by 2085. In 1979, Danish phenotypic IQ was 98, but by 2072, it is 93, having dropped 5 IQ points in less than a century. As national IQ decreases, Denmark will be gradually transformed into a Latin American “banana republic.” Ethnic Danes, demoralized by feminism and social welfare legislation, will have no choice but to acquiesce to the destruction of their own country. Significant damage to the economy and educational infrastructure are to be expected; a 5 point drop in Danish IQ means a 35% reduction in the nation’s GDP. Democracy will inevitably become unsustainable as average national IQ plummets below 90; it will be replaced by the authoritarian political culture and religious dogmatism found in Middle Eastern, African and Latin American societies.

Belief that “more White babies” are the answer to dysgenic fertility among Whites is just as dangerous and genocidal as the liberal belief that Third World “replacement migration” is “cultural enrichment.” Since low-IQ females leave behind more offspring than those of high IQ, more White births would reduce high-IQ females to an “endangered species.” This would intensify the “Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” already occurring in Western populations. As Whites “devolve,” they will no longer be able to maintain their own Western industrialized societies. A demographic transition of such magnitude would transform Western Europe and North America, the Occidental heartland, into a cultural and biological extension of the Third World. Since women are loyal to wealth and power, but not race, one can expect genocidal levels of miscegenation between White females of low intelligence and the non-White foreigners who have dispossessed Whites and conquered the West.

To reverse the process of dysgenic selection, the White man must do three things:

He must get rid of the hostile elite.

He must forcibly repatriate all Third World “migrants,” including their descendants. Forced “remigration” is not an unrealistic policy; mass population transfers have been successfully carried out before, i.e. deportation of Germans, 1944-50, from Eastern and Central European countries to Germany and Austria.

If selective pressures in medieval Europe and colonial America led to the steady eugenic improvement of Western populations, making it possible for them to conquer 84% of the globe’s surface, only their re-emergence will reverse the dysgenic selection that has bedeviled the White race since the mid-19th century. This can only be accomplished through a rigorous application of classical eugenic principles.

If the White race is to survive, only its strongest and most intelligent members must be prepared for the harsh Darwinian struggle that lies ahead. Wasting precious resources on mental and genetic defectives is sheer pathological altruism. Race-conscious Whites have a collective interest in raising healthy and intelligent offspring, but no such interest can exist when it comes to those who are weak and unintelligent. They are “life unworthy of life”; even they would not consent to such a truncated and meager existence if given full possession of their normal faculties. From a White nationalist perspective, to bring such children into the world is selfish and morally irresponsible; they impose unnecessary fiscal burdens on Whites and use up resources that are better invested elsewhere.

The race-conscious White man is faced with a dilemma: because of liberal elite hostility to his own ethnic genetic interests, any program of eugenic enhancement would be outlawed under the current totalitarian leftist order; at the same time, he cannot simply wait out the elite-managed decline of Western civilization. In less than a few generations, most of his race may become drooling mental defectives, if they haven’t already miscegenated themselves out of existence into the burgeoning mass of Third World “migrants” who now infest his homeland. If he must take action, he must take it now, otherwise all is lost.

Race-conscious Whites must abandon all leftist-controlled urban areas to “live off the grid.” By colonizing relatively unpopulated areas of North America and Western Europe, the White man will return to a rustic existence, filling the countryside, the mountains, the forests, the tundra with Whites only settlements, similar to the Boer-only settlement of Orania in South Africa. Living the way his ancestors did centuries ago will ensure that no Third World “immigrant” follows him into the mountains or the wilderness. Self-imposed hardship will further intensify Darwinian selective pressure on Whites, jumpstarting the process of natural eugenic enhancement, just as it did during the early colonization of the Americas. Once race-conscious Whites have become sufficiently numerous, they must embark on a program of state-sponsored eugenics. This will be used to strengthen the White population until they are able to wrest control of North America and Western Europe from the hostile elites and their army of greedy “migrants.”

The new ethnostate will be constitutionally grounded on Aristotelian political philosophy and neoDarwinian biology; it will be a meritocracy based on eugenic principles. Eugenics, the scientific ideological core of the new White nationalism, is easily reconciled with the aristocratic political science of Aristotle; both are concerned with the development and formation of the best possible citizen, one along genetic and the other along characterological lines. Aristotelian philosophy is based on a linear hierarchical conception of reality; this overlaps with the dominance hierarchies of the animal kingdom and of all human socio-political organization. Furthermore, the capacity for superior moral development is improved substantially by superior genes. In an Aristotelian political order informed by eugenic principles, the state would ensure that all citizens have both the mental and physical capacity to live the good life. Mandatory genetic screening would be one of the conditions of citizenship; those at risk of transmitting hereditary diseases or conditions, such as criminality or low IQ, would undergo compulsory eugenic sterilization. Only the best and most virtuous citizens, the biologically and intellectually superior “aristoi” or natural-born aristocrats, would be the ones allowed total freedom of action in the political sphere.

In the ethnostate, the aristoi of the White race will determine who must give birth and who must be sterilized. These men are not petty bureaucrats, but aristocrats selected on the basis of health and IQ. Their sole task is the promotion of White racial survival, whatever the cost. For those who believe eugenic sterilization is barbarous and cruel, allowing the birth of children who suffer from mental retardation or cystic fibrosis is much, much worse. For this reason, only the healthiest, high-IQ females will be allowed to breed, even being massively incentivized to do so. Encouraging the natural increase of healthy, intelligent Whites, at the expense of the low IQ and genetically unfit, is the most White nationalist thing a White man can do for his race.

Some will necessarily object: “But state-sponsored eugenics will infringe on individual rights and freedoms!” This is a common, but groundless objection. The “right to procreate” is not an absolute. In 7 utilitarian ethics, rights are never ends in themselves; they exist to maximize the happiness of the greatest number and must be tempered by social obligation. Furthermore, not all men have the capacity for individual freedom. The Greek philosopher Aristotle recognized the existence of natural slavery because of the inability of some to reason autonomously, even though they may be responsive to reasoned instruction. Whether a man is free or not must be determined by his capacity to reason (for us, his IQ).

Legislation regulating some of the most intimate areas of our lives is hardly controversial; if we allow government to enforce this legislation, ostensibly in the interest of public safety, why not allow government to decide who gets to reproduce and who doesn’t? If the low IQ and genetically unfit are allowed to breed recklessly, as they do now, Western civilization will eventually be reduced to smoldering ruins. Unregulated breeding is far more dangerous than any black market specializing in the sale of illicit firearms or drugs. Society would be much safer if it allowed every citizen to acquire large arsenals of weapons without special licensing, but criminalized the marriage and procreation of the low IQ and genetically unfit.

If a large minority of race-conscious Whites emigrate, seceding from the leftist totalitarian state to independently pursue their own racial interests, reversal of dysgenic fertility and Third World “immigration” may be accomplished within a few generations. As race-conscious Whites strengthen their race through genetic enhancement, the totalitarian left will get weaker, forced to increasingly rely on low-IQ Whites and “migrants” for manpower. From their bases in the Pacific Northwest or Lapland, race-conscious Whites, stronger and more intelligent than ever before, would raid globalist-occupied territory, slowly enlarging their own dominions until the reconquest of North America and Western Europe has been completed. This is not without historical precedent. Medieval Spanish Christians, reduced to a small area of their own country, seized the emirates of Mohammedan Andalusia one by one, until the last emirate of Granada had been defeated, its Moorish inhabitants expelled from the Iberian peninsula in 1492.

Race-conscious Whites must live, think and breathe race, just as they did during the long and distinguished reign of Queen Victoria, when Whites were at the peak of their intellectual and artistic powers. In this age of drab multicultural uniformity, the White man’s race is his most formidable weapon, a thorn in the side of those who wish to replace him with the low IQ peasant masses of the Middle East, Africa, South Asia and Latin America. Nothing terrifies the hostile elites more than the prospect of encountering race-conscious White men bred for superior intellect and physical strength, able to aggressively pursue their own racial interests undeterred by elite and non-White hostility.

zionController #sexist reddit.com

I logged into reddit today, and as usual I had about 5-10 messages from some really butt hurt redditors saying Im a peice of shit, an asshole, a jerk, a psycho or sociopath, people like me belong in jail, etc. etc. etc. Then I look at my phone and there are some beautiful naked pics of a hot 18 year old I met recently. Niiiice. I send them to my friend, he sends me pics that girls are sending him.

We laugh a bit. I get some more texts, one from a decent looking 19 year old girl telling me how much fun she had the other night and thanking me for taking her out. I get another text, its my woman saying she`s buying grocieries and making me something special for dinner tonight. She comes home and gets mad because she finds another womans sock somewhere and doesnt know whos it is. I laugh it off, I seriously dont know either.

I went to the gym, did some really heavy squats, some bench, etc... feelsgoodman. Went home, had the best dinner ever, girl is on her period so I accept a blowjob. I play some guitar and I sit down to write this article about it. More reddit hate messages: Your whole subreddit is scumbags and you should all die. Youre probably some 14 year old virgin loser. You`re just an ugly lonely guy. There is a beautiful woman who adores me sleeping in my bed right now. Ive never been in such good shape.

Core redpill truths and their corollaries:
Women are attracted to confidence; No one is more confident than a narcissist.
Women are attracted to calm strength, not anxiety; No one is more calm than a sociopath.
Women are attracted to dominant men; Disagreeable, even violent men, are the most dominant.
Women are attracted to men who embrace risk; Dangerous men, and men in dangerous settings are the most comfortable embacring risk.
Dark triad traits make for the most attractive men. A high pitched voice and a soft weak body won`t do it. Sorry.

I fully acknowledge, and even embrace these core values, and it brings me great success in life, in love, with women, professionally... The only people who dont like me are the feminists and the manginas. Why dont they love me too? Why dont they love TheRedPill? Because its very existence, and the successful nature of the men who frequent this little corner of the internet is proof positive that they are full of shit.

It pains these people to think that some of us are hard working, fit, successful people who women find unbearably attractive in some way. They need to tell eachother that we arent real. Like kids who cant sleep at night and need their parents to tell them that there is no monster under their bed. Dont worry little mangina, just be yourself and the right woman will fall in love with you, shes not sending nude barely legal pics to zionController right now. Take your blue pill and go to sleep :)

Im only here to tell you the truth. Nothing more. I hope all you become so great at life that your mere presence makes you hated by all those who dont have the balls to /r/becomeaman .
I realize a lot of my posts piss people off. No one was madder about me saying women shouldnt vote than my own woman when I told her I would support taking her voting privilege away. She says Im a jerk. Shes right. I ask her if she still loves me. She says unfortunately. I say then it doesnt really matter that Im a jerk then, does it?

It doesnt really matter how much hate this sub gets, I get, you get, redpillschool gets... Its normal for the sheep to dislike the birds of prey. Keep lifting, eat healthy, spend your money wisely, pursue your dreams. Remember that women are children and that they shouldnt vote. Good women do dishes and dont withold sex from their spouses. Unmarried women over 30 are pathetic, and no one will ever care about your problems if you are a man. Lift heavy things, become a strong man, disregard females and be in a perpetual state of reading and learning. Its up to you to make your world into something you find desirable. Good luck and God bless.

Ricardo Duchesne #racist #crackpot #wingnut eurocanadian.ca

The white race is uniquely altruistic. Why? This is a very difficult question to answer. It is easy to understand altruistic behavior for the benefit of one's family members. This is common among animals. Mother bears will put their lives in danger to protect their cubs from attack. Sacrifices for one's relatives and in-group ethnic members are also common. The difficult question is: why whites are singularly motivated to perform actions that benefit members of out-groups when such actions harm their ingroup members and families? This is known in dissident circles as "pathological altruism". The Antislavery Movement One would think that the existence of a huge literature on the subject of altruism would have provided us with definite answers about the unique nature of white altruism. Not really. Since any discussion about racial differences is prohibited in academia, this behavior is invariably framed as if it were a disposition among humans in general.

White academics habitually project their altruistic behaviors to humans as humans. Kevin MacDonald is one of a few evolutionary psychologists who understands that whites are singularly altruistic outside their kin-group, and that explaining this behavior requires a Darwinian approach that is wedded to the history of whites. This is the subject of chapter 7 of his book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition. He argues that the "moral idealism in the British antislavery movement", which led to the abolition of the slave trade in 1807 and slavery in 1833, offers an excellent case study of the nature and historical origins of white pathological altruism. Without overlooking other psychological motivations which generally come into play among leaders in all movements, such as ambition, personal gain, including the satisfaction of being praised as a selfless individual, MacDonald carefully goes over the antislavery sentiments expressed over many decades, starting in the eighteenth century, by Quakers, Evangelical Anglicans, and Methodists. The leaders of the antislavery movement were sincerely empathetic individuals moved by the suffering of others.

The influential Marxist explanation that the campaign against slavery occurred only when it was no longer advantageous for capitalism to exploit slave labor is seriously flawed. One would expect an evolutionary psychologist to be drawn to an explanation that emphasizes the economic self-interests of whites. But as we have seen in our multipart review of MacDonald's book, this type of explanation misses out the singularity whites have exhibited throughout history in creating communities with ideological norms that encouraged trust beyond one's family network. As we saw in Part 3 of my extended review, whites exhibited WEIRD behaviors early on in their history. Back in the age of hunting and gathering they were more inclined to extend their trust to members of outside tribes (because this was a naturally advantageous strategy in the climes of northwest Europe). In contrast, trust in the non-Western world was restricted to ingroup members. In the course of time, whites came to exhibit more WEIRD traits, such as monogamous behaviors among powerful men despite their natural instinct for polygamy. The Catholic Church nurtured norms inside the "higher" frontal parts of the brain capable of inducing guilt and fear of godly punishment among powerful men who failed to control their sexual drives.
...
MacDonald's point is not that whites were wrong to seek the abolition of slavery. His aim is to understand the excessive moral preoccupation whites exhibited about the plight of Africans coupled with their current pathological empathy for aggressive immigrants occupying their lands. In light of this reality, and the complete indifference Muslims have to this day about their thousand-year old enslavement of Africans, these Puritan-descended movements do seem incredibly naive, child-like, and devoid of realism. What is there to admire about this?

secret wiki #magick #conspiracy secret-wiki.de

Magic works and is used in many ways, at times unconsciously, at times deliberately.

Prestidigitators, stage magicians and charlatans contributed to the image of magic being banished into the realm of illusion, tricks, deception, sorcery and fairy tales. With this, more or less fear was created or control over magic conveyed through exposing tricks.

The original meaning and the sense of magic were lost in the process. For distinction, Aleister Crowley introduced the term "magick" to distinguish stage magic, illusionists and pseudo-sorcerers from real sorcerers. This article is about this kind of magic, as there is no German equivalent for the English word "magick".

imageThe four elements and the magic mirror are fundamental to magic.

Is magic real?

The average citizen does not "believe" in it or at least speaks little about it, but an astonishing number of people practice magic.

It is important to realise that magic works and is used on a daily base. Its power and its use can be great and delivers tangible results, although only few can actually manifest it on a large scale. But every disciplined mind can learn and practice it.

Some of the real practitioners do not want the masses to know that and how well magic works because they would lose this advantage in power. Therefore, they spread the belief that it is nothing but tricks and magic effects are the delusions of crackpots.

Recently, the knowledge of magic and its effects has been returning more and more to normal society, but generally, it is not talked about much.
During Christianisation, this folk-knowledge was lost and remains only rudimentary in wisdoms. Thus it was forc-ed to only be preserved and practiced in secret societies or family tradition. Since recent decades, ever better literature on the topic is becoming available, but the area is still strongly dominated by half-knowledge.

The very materialistically or scientifically socialised part of the populace stays firm in their belief in the non-existance of magic or connect magic with superstitious practices divorced from reality.

Demarcations

With “magical thinking”, which is also a stage of development in toddlers, one refers cause and effect selectively to oneself. This means they produce a strong correlation between his own powers of realisation and an event that could just as well have happened completely independently of his thoughts. Experience is dominated by egocentrism and the impression of being the centre of Creation, the point of origin of the universe’s power of Creation.

Such thought-magic is considered a pathological loss of reality in the manic phase in Manic-Depressives. Magical thinking however has another foundation, than gaining awareness and thus is only very limited in its effectiveness (generally just self harming).

Blessings are not viewed in the sense of magic. Here, the focus lies on the Divine, not on the own goals and intentions.

Healers can use magical rituals.

Fundamentals

Magic is the art and the science of bringing about changes through altered states of consciousness in accord with the will.
- Frater V.D.

Magic is the wilful influence over reality or as Bardon writes, the sacred science of all knowledge.
It works through various techniques to accomplish definitive goals. In this, magic applies the general Laws of the Mind.

Here, magic is a took and, taken by itself, completely neutral. It is just an option which the practitioner can use in any way. It can be compared with a knife, with which one can prepare food or harm someone else. Its effectiveness can be enormous with good magical schooling and correct usage and should not be underestimated.

A large part of the known effects of magic is based on strong projection of the magician upon the energy field of the addressed one (others or himself), so that his sensations and perception are altered. In this, the self-energy is frequently augmented through rituals or external energies. This can also lead to altered resonances within the different energy bodies of a person that attract corresponding experiences, for example what was once commonly known as a “bad luck” curse.

The options for working magic are diverse, for example:
* Training intuition and willpower
* Energetic work (for example with the 4 elements, energetic body training)
* Thought concentration and focussing
* Working with the subconsciousness
* Usage of foreign energies and powers (angels, (Light-) Masters, demons etc.)
* Working with symbols, archetypes and rituals (candles, visualisations, certain sequences of motion) or usage of amulets
* Spells of banishment or magic, invocations
* Tarot can be used as a way of magical initiation, but the Tarot is not to be equated to magic.
* Esoterics work magic, as long as the intention is to influence or manipulate reality energetically or through willpower. Generally speaking, esotericism is a path to enlightenment and does not contain magic. It does, however deal with the same foundational principles that form the foundation of magic, and for this reason it can result from it. The magical path to enlightenment is more concrete and practical in focus than esotericism, which is focussed on developing consciousness in any form.

An important principle of working magic is formulated in ”To Know, To Dare, To Will, To Be Silent”, which is one of the reasons why only few practitioners speak about it. Silence is part of the power of the manifestation, whereas speaking can disperse this power and expose it to opposed forces.

The practice of magic means to influence, to deliberately change things through force of will and at one's own discretion. Characteristically, the main focus here lies in the power of the human will – as opposed to ways of knowing that merely recognise that which is without using this insight: here, the usage is left to the Divine and techniques that optimise the bodily/subtle-energy conditions for the purpose of perceiving personal enlightenment (such as Yoga) are not generally understood as magic/magical forces.

More on occult, magical abilities also in the article Esotericism,
more on techniques in the article Energetic Self-Protection
more on the functional foundations in the article Laws of Life
and even more on magic in a FAQ on magieausbildung.de

White and Black Magic
White magic refers to magic used to heal or to help others. It also includes using magic to protect oneself or others. The intention is to use Light and “good”, benevolent forces. Most witch-cults call themselves white-magical. White magic is also used for the purpose of enlightenment.

Black magic refers to magic used in the pursuit of selfish and self-centered goals, for example in order to gain more money, property, power and success. It is seen as acceptable or even intended that others are harmed or attacked by this. A famous example are voodoo techniques that these days are still used mainly in African countries. Black-magical practices are mainly based on greed, envy, jealousy, anger/hatred and/or lust for power.

From this area stem the attempts to oblige foreign or entire societies into certain rituals to draw power from them. Often enough, these tactics are successful. It is common to wrap dark magic in a nice package and thus deceive. Not everyone who enters dressed in White has honest intentions. Black magic in particular likes to use deception and illusion and does so extensively. Furthermore, it leaves its followers in ignorance and wins through intimidation: in Adepts (those learning the way of magic), to stay dominant, and in the deceived “good” people (who frequently do not have any idea who they serve) simply so that they do what they would not do otherwise.

Tarot Card The Magician
imageThe Sorcerer of the Crowley Tarot in his three manifestations

In the Crowley Tarot Deck, publisher Urania has added all three versions of Frieda Harris’s drawings of the Magicician: the white magician (golden, left), the black magician (with a dark shadow in the background, right), and the magician transcendent (the juggler, at the centre. Crowley, however, had only authorised the sorcerer transcendent back then, which was the form to strive for.

The white and black magician are part of the dual system, of the dual plane, whereas the juggler has integrated and transcended the dual magical forces. He can use both forces – not according to his own volition but in accordance to the divine will.

Transcended dealing with the magical abilities is attributed to spiritual Masters and points to a difference between spiritual Masters and magicians.

Protection Against Magic
The best defence against unwanted magical influences is gaining awareness of the way magic works
In the article Energetic Self-Protection, various options for protecting oneself and locations are described. For a start, everyone can pay attention to the resonance. The ones most likely to deal with deliberate magical ham are people who work magic themselves or who did it in a potential previous life. Old connection can appear or be activated during certain procedures or stages of development. Especially white-magically oriented people frequently challenge nether spirits in polarity. This can lead to the magician being disturbed or influenced by their dark power or to the spirits trying to subjugate him.

imageNo one should move glasses, conjure spirits/ghosts or “play” with comparable things for amusement. If it is done “correctly”, the summoned and unused entity will easily turn against the practitioner.
When a dark guest enters the channel in an ill-conceived attempt at channelling, it is not trivial to get rid of him and successful help is rare.

Ultimately, such “games” result in an increased resonance towards magic of the lower or dark kind, which follows one like a shadow and adds a subliminal bad taste to all good works.

* Against general magical mass-manipulation, a clear mind, a lot of water and a healthy body help. It is always the unaware and weak minds that are susceptible.
* In clubs, it can be problematic if one is the target of magic while weakened (for example by alcohol, tiredness, consumption of drugs). In such a case, the magic can even be effective afterwards, but is normally resolved with a lot of pure water and self-centering. In exceptional cases, external help ie needed, for example by an essence.
* Similarly, harmful energies can be taken with oneself unconsciously at mass events, especially in places where magic is performed in ignorance. Unfortunately, this very fact is not known to the visitors of such events. Then this can also include smaller meetings. The knowledge on how to protect oneself or a good connection to the Divine (or to a divine person) are the best companions.

Positions of power can be named as a further endangered group. In such covens – reportedly in lodges – black magic is used frequently to accomplish economical goals.

Where are magical procedures performed?
* Magically effective procedures and rituals are widely used in religions. This frequently happens without the faithful being aware of it, via rituals and prayers.
* The hypnosis of today supposedly originated in the magical tradition as well, it works with the Subconsciousness and influences it.
* Many covens, lodges, neopagans and cults such as witches practice magic and teach it. Among them, most of them are likely honourable and harmless.
* Tantra, which more and more people are discovering for themselves, was original a spiritual method of enlightenment. However, Tantra is also used frequently magically for the manifestation and deepening of a bond with the wish-partner. When used with this (manipulative) purpose, Tantra counts as sexual magic. As targeted built-up sexual energy has a strong effect, it was used against demons in the past. However, it is advised against manipulation of the Kundalini energy because it can also cause damage if impurities are present.
One example of a magical sexual procedure is here – (in English) – with further types of magic here. (Submitter’s note: Links broken)
* Magical techniques are also used for manipulation of the masses.
* For example through religious symbols on vertices of power that change the base structure of the regional energy. (Christian crosses on the summits of mountains, energy intersections and churches, with the effect of binding the populace to the material)
* Symbols of corporations, ideologies and flags
* Modern advertising, as it utilises originally magical ways to deliver information (advertising) into the Subconsciousness. This is exactly what a magician does with himself, it is just that he determines the content and thus the goal himself.
* The massive proliferation, for example printed-on skulls and bones on many products have magical meaning in regards to the manipulation of society as well (corresponds to Saturn and among other things the preservation of existing structures)

Magic & (World) Politics
Secret, very powerful lodges work in the background and supposedly influence politics, banks and the economy. It is known that very many politicians, magnates, nobility, musicians and bankers in some orders and lodges. At times, they may be harmless, at times subverted and at times indeed part of a powerful network of lodges.

Whether secret lodges do indeed rule the world, but some things indicate their heavy influence. Especially the fact that this topic is avoided in movies and media is conspicuous. In documentaries, it is mostly Rosicrucians and Freemasons are portrayed (for example the membership of most US presidents in the Masonic Lodge). It is at least within the realm of possibility and should therefore worth consideration.
For the study of this topic, the following literature could be helpful:
* Banks, Bread and Bombs – Volume 1 by Stefan Erdmann
* Secret Societies and Their Power in the 20th Century 1 & 2 by Jan van Helsing
* Secret Societies 3rd War of the Freemasons by Jan van Helsing
* And The Truth Shall Set You Free – Part 1 by David Icke
* 334 ‰ Lie by H.M. v. Stuhl

Learning Magic
It is harder to cast magic than to protect oneself against it. It requires disciplines and constant practice, as well as continuous development of character. Another perspective assumes that we only remember, skills we already mastered in earlier lives or as a soul.
The practice of magical procedures is always tied into development of character and a form of therapy.
The short, easy way, is generally called the dark one.

imageIn black magic covens, the learning one (adept) will normally surrender his control completely and entrusts himself completely to a master or to a community. Those who want to leave such a coven apparently frequently suffer worldly or magically induced accidents.
*Various covens offer magical training. As most of them are structured pyramidally, the initiate does not know what the intentions of those ranking above him truly are. Disciples are often monopolised and pay either with (a lot of) money or with his energy and magical work. Interested people should therefore inform themselves in advance and select carefully.
* There are small covens and societies, some of them are public or can be found with a serious search.
* One core are the Laws which should be part of everyone’s basic knowledge and are by themselves completely uncontroversial. These laws, however, also find application within magic, as they represent an instruction for reality.
*Books inform about the methods up to self-training via literature.

* School of High Magic by Frater V.D.
* The Way To The True Adept by Franz Bardon
* Transcendental Magic: Dogma and Ritual of High Magic by Eliphas Levi

Original German Magie wirkt und findet in vielfacher Weise Anwendung, teils unbewusst, teils absichtlich.

Taschenspieler, Bühnenzauberer und Scharlatane haben dazu beigetragen, das Bild von Magie in das Reich von Illusion, Tricks, Manipulation, Betrug, Zauberei und Märchen zu verbannen. Damit wurde mehr oder weniger Angst erzeugt oder durch Entlarvung von Tricks eine Beherrschbarkeit von Magie vermittelt.

Die ursprüngliche Bedeutung und der Sinn von Magie gingen dabei verloren. Zur Abgrenzung wurde daher von Aleister Crowley der Begriff "magick" eingeführt, der Bühnenzauberei, Illusionisten und Pseudomagier von echten Magiern unterscheiden sollte. Der Artikel handelt von dieser Art Magie, wobei es keine deutsche Entsprechung gibt für das englische Wort "Magick".
Magie
Die vier Elemente & der magische Spiegel sind Grundlage der Magie

Gibt es Magie wirklich?

Der normale Bürger "glaubt" nicht daran oder spricht zumindest kaum darüber, jedoch wenden erstaunlich viele Menschen magische Praktiken an.

Es ist wichtig zu erkennen, dass Magie wirkt und täglich angewendet wird. Ihre Kraft und ihr Nutzen kann groß sein und liefert handfeste Ergebnisse, wenn dies auch nur wenige in großen Ausmaßen manifestieren können. Doch jeder disziplinierte Geist kann sie erlernen und anwenden.

Manche der tatsächlichen Anwender möchten nicht, dass die breite Masse erfährt, dass und wie wirksam Magie ist, weil sie dann diesen Machtvorteil verlieren würden. Deshalb verbreiten sie, es seien nur Tricks und Spinner würden sich magische Wirkungen einbilden.

Neuerdings kommt das Wissen um die Magie und ihre Wirkungen mehr und mehr wieder in die normale Gesellschaft zurück, dabei wird in der Regel wenig darüber gesprochen.
Durch die Christianisierung ging dieses Volkswissen verloren und ist nur noch rudimentär in Weisheiten verfügbar. Dadurch wurde es gezwungener-maßen, nur in geheimen Vereinigungen oder durch familiäre Überlieferung gepflegt, benutzt und erhalten. Seit einigen Jahrzehnten ist immer bessere Literatur zum Thema erhältlich, trotzdem herrscht noch viel Halbwissen in diesem Bereich.

Der sehr materialistisch oder wissenschaftlich geprägte Teil der Bevölkerung hält an der Nichtexistenz von Magie fest oder verbindet Magie mit realitätsfernen, abergläubischen Praktiken.

Wo wohnen die Dämonen?: Was Sie schon immer über Magie wissen wollten* von Frater V.D.

Abgrenzungen

Beim "magischen Denken", das auch eine Entwicklungsphase des Kleinkindes ist, bezieht der Mensch selektiv Ursache und Wirkung auf sich selbst. Das heißt, er stellt einen extremen Zusammenhang her zwischen seinen eigenen Verwirklichungskräften und einem Geschehnis, was ebenso-gut völlig unabhängig von seinem Denken passiert sein kann. Das Erleben wird beherrscht von Egozentrik und dem Eindruck, der Mittelpunkt der Schöpfung, der Ausgangspunkt der Schöpferkraft des Universums zu sein.

Als krankhafter Realitätsverlust gilt solche Gedankenmagie in der manischen Phase von Manisch-Depressiven. Magisches Denken hat jedoch eine andere Grundlage, als die Bewusstwerdung und ist daher nur sehr begrenzt wirksam (eher nur selbst-schädigend).

Segnungen werden nicht im Sinne von Magie betrachtet. Hier steht das Göttliche im Vordergrund, nicht die eigenen Ziele und Absichten.

Heiler können magische Rituale benutzen.
Grundlagen

Magie ist die Kunst und die Wissenschaft, mit Hilfe von veränderten Bewusstseinszuständen im Einklang mit dem Willen Veränderungen herbeizuführen.
Frater V.D.


Magie ist die willentliche Beeinflussung der Wirklichkeit oder wie Bardon schreibt, die heilige Wissenschaft allen Wissens[1]
Sie arbeitet mit verschiedenen Techniken, um definierte Ziele zu erreichen. Die Magie wendet dabei die allgemeinen Gesetzmäßigkeiten des Geistes an.

Die Magie ist dabei ein Werkzeug und für sich genommen völlig neutral. Sie ist nur eine Möglichkeit, welcher der Ausübende auf jede Art nutzen kann. Vergleichbar mit einem Messer, mit welchem man Nahrung zubereiten oder einem anderen schaden kann. Ihre Wirksamkeit kann bei guter magischer Schulung und korrekter Anwendung enorm sein und sollte nicht unterschätzt werden.

Ein Großteil der bekannten Wirkung von Magie beruht auf starker Projektion des Magiers auf das Energiefeld des Adressierten (andere oder er selbst), sodass dessen Empfindung und Wahrnehmung verändert wird. Die Eigenenergie wird dabei gerne mittels Ritualen oder Fremdenergien verstärkt. Das kann in den verschiedenen Energiekörpern einer Person auch veränderte Resonanzen hervorrufen, die entsprechende Erfahrungen anziehen, wie zum Beispiel früher landläufig ein sogenannter "Pech"-Fluch.
Hier beruht die gemachte Erfahrung nach dem Gesetz der Anziehung (Resonanz-Gesetz) nicht auf eigenen Glaubenssätzen sondern auf projizierten, in die Aura platzierten Elementen (Introjekte).

Es gibt vielfältige Möglichkeiten, magisch zu arbeiten, wie zum Beispiel:

Intuition und Willenskraft schulen
Energetisches Arbeiten (zum Beispiel mit den 4 Elementen, energetische Körperschulung)
Gedankenkonzentration und Fokussierung
Arbeiten mit dem Unterbewusstsein
Nutzen fremder Energien und Mächte (Engel, (Licht-) Meister, Dämonen u.ä.)
Arbeiten mit Symbolen, Archetypen und Ritualen (Kerzen, Visualisierungen, bestimmte Bewegungsabfolgen) oder Verwendung von Amuletten
Bann- oder Zaubersprüche, Anrufungen (Invokationen)
Tarot kann als magischer Einweihungsweg Verwendung finden, doch ist das Tarot nicht mit Magie gleichzusetzen.
Esoteriker arbeiten magisch, sofern die Absicht verfolgt wird, energetisch oder mit Willenskraft, die Wirklichkeit zu beeinflussen oder zu manipulieren. Grundsätzlich ist die Esoterik ein Erkenntnisweg und beinhaltet keine Magie. Jedoch befasst sie sich mit denselben Grundprinzipien, die der Magie zugrunde liegen, weshalb es sich daraus ergeben kann. Der magische Erkenntnisweg ist konkreter & praktischer angelegt als die Esoterik, die sich auf Bewusstseinsentwicklung ausrichtet, auf jedwede Art und Weise.

Ein wichtiger Grundsatz der magischen Arbeit formuliert sich in "Wisse, Wage, Wolle, Schweige", was mit dazu führt, dass nur wenige Ausübende darüber sprechen. Das Schweigen gehört zur Kraft der Manifestation, während das Sprechen diese Kraft zerstreuen und Gegenkräften aussetzen würde.

Die Anwendung von Magie bedeutet, zu beeinflussen, gezielt Dinge durch Willenskraft und nach eigenem Ermessen zu verändern. Kennzeichnend ist hierbei der Hauptfokus auf die Macht des menschlichen Willens - im Gegensatz zu Erkenntniswegen, die lediglich das anerkennen, was ist, ohne die Erkenntnis zu benutzen: die Verwendung wird hier dem Göttlichen überlassen und Techniken, die die körperlichen/feinstofflichen Bedingungen zur Wahrnehmung der eigenen Erkenntnis optimieren (wie Yoga), werden im Allgemeinen nicht als Magie bzw. magische Kräfte verstanden.

Mehr zu okkulten, magischen Fähigkeiten auch im Artikel Esoterik,
mehr zu Praktiken im Artikel Energetischer Selbstschutz
mehr zu funktionellen Grundlagen im Artikel Lebensgesetze
und noch mehr zu Magie in einem FAQ von magieausbildung.de
Weiße und Schwarze Magie

Von weißer Magie wird gesprochen, wenn damit geheilt oder anderen geholfen wird. Auch die Anwendung zum Schutz für sich selbst oder von anderen zählt dazu. Die Absicht ist, Licht und "gute", wohlwollende Kräfte zu nutzen. Die meisten Hexen-Kulte bezeichnen sich als weiß-magisch. Weiße Magie wird auch zu Erkenntniszwecken genutzt.

Von schwarzer Magie wird gesprochen, wenn eigennützige und eigenwillige Ziele verfolgt werden, wie beispielsweise mehr Geld, Besitz, Macht und Erfolg zu erhalten. Es wird in Kauf genommen oder gar beabsichtigt, dabei anderen zu schaden oder anzugreifen. Ein bekanntes Beispiel dafür sind Voodoo-Praktiken, die heute noch hauptsächlich in afrikanischen Ländern praktiziert werden. Die Basis schwarz-magischer Praktiken ist im wesentlichen Gier, Neid, Eifersucht, Ärger/Hass, und/oder Machtstreben.

Aus diesem Bereich kommen die Versuche, fremde oder ganze Gesellschaften auf bestimmte Rituale einzuschwören um daraus Energie zu schöpfen. Oft genug sind diese Taktiken erfolgreich. Es ist gängige Praxis, dunkle Magie in schöne Verpackung zu schlagen und damit zu blenden. Nicht jeder, der Weiß gekleidet daher kommt, verfolgt hehre Ziele.
Gerade die schwarze Magie arbeitet gerne und ausgiebig mit Täuschung und Blendwerk. Überdies lässt sie ihr Gefolge gerne in Unkenntnis und gewinnt durch Beängstigung: bei Adepten (lernende des magischen Weges), um überlegen zu bleiben und bei den geblendeten "guten" Menschen (welche oft nicht einmal ahnen, wem sie dienen) schlichtweg, damit sie tun, was sie sonst nicht täten.
Tarotkarte Der Magier
Der Magier des Crowley-Tarot in seinen drei Erscheinungs-Formen

Im Crowley-Tarot-Deck hat der Urania-Verlag seit 1986 alle drei Versionen von Frieda Harris' Zeichnung des Magieres beigefügt: den weißen Magier (goldfarben, links), den schwarzen Magier (mit einem dunklem Schatten im Hintergrund, rechts) und den transzendenten Magier (den Jongleur, in der Mitte). Crowley hatte damals jedoch nur den transzendenten Magier autorisiert, welches die anzustrebende Form war.

Der weiße und der schwarze Magier sind Teil des dualen Systems, der dualen Ebene, während der Jongleur die dualen magischen Kräfte integriert und transzendiert hat. Er kann beide Kräfte verwenden - nicht nach Eigenwillen sondern im Einklang mit dem göttlichen Willen.

Der transzendierte Umgang mit den magischen Fähigkeiten wird spirituellen Meistern zugeschrieben und weist auf einen Unterschied hin zwischen spirituellen Meistern und Magiern.
Schutz vor Magie

Der beste Schutz gegen ungewollte magische Beeinflussung ist die Bewusstwerdung, wie Magie wirkt.

Im Artikel Energetischer Selbstschutz werden verschiedene Möglichkeiten beschrieben sich und Räumlichkeiten zu schützen.
Grundsätzlich kann jeder die Resonanz beachten. Wer am ehesten mit bewussten magischen Schädigungen zu tun hat, sind Menschen, welche selbst magisch arbeiten oder dies in einem möglichen Vorleben taten. Alte Verbindungen können auftauchen oder aktiviert werden bei bestimmten Praktiken oder Entwicklungsstufen. Besonders weiß-magisch orientierte Menschen fordern in der Polarität gern niedere Geister heraus. Dies kann dazu führen, dass der Magier von deren dunkler Macht gestört oder beeinflusst wird oder die Geister versuchen, ihn zu unterwerfen .
Ausrufezeichen.png
Niemand sollte zur Belustigung Gläser-rücken, Geister beschwören oder vergleichbares "spielen". Wenn es "richtig" gemacht wird, richtet sich die gerufene und ungenutzte Wesenheit leicht gegen den Anwender.

Kommt bei unüberlegten Channeling-Versuchen ein dunkler Gast in die Leitung, wird man diesen nicht mehr ohne weiteres los und erfolgreiche Hilfe ist rar.
Letztlich entsteht durch solche "Spiele" eine verstärke Resonanz zur Magie der niederen oder dunklen Art, die einem wie ein Schatten folgt und allem gutem Handeln einen unterschwelligen schalen Beigeschmack beifügt.

Gegen allgemeine magische Massenbeeinflussung hilft ein klarer Geist, viel Wasser und ein gesunder Körper. Anfällig sind immer eher die unbewussten und schwachen Geister.
Problematisch kann es in Clubs sein, wenn man geschwächt (zum Beispiel durch Alkohol, Müdigkeit, Drogenkonsum) Ziel von Magie wird. In so einem Fall kann die Magie sogar noch nachher wirksam sein, erledigt sich aber in der Regel durch viel reines Wasser und Selbstzentrierung. Im Ausnahmefall braucht es fremde Hilfe, zum Beispiel durch eine Essenz
Ebenso können durch Massenveranstaltungen schädigende Energien unbewusst mitgenommen werden, besonders an Orten, an welchen in Unkenntnis magisch gewirkt wird. Leider ist es genau dann den Besuchern solcher Veranstaltungen häufig nicht bewusst. Das kann dann auch kleinere Treffen mit einschließen. Das Wissen darum, wie man sich schützt oder eine gute Anbindung ans Göttliche (oder an eine göttliche Person) sind die besten Begleiter.

Als gefährdete Gruppe können noch Machtpositionen genannt werden. In diesen Kreisen wird - angeblich von Logen - öfter schwarze Magie angewandt, um wirtschaftliche Ziele zu erreichen.
Wo werden magische Praktiken ausgeübt?

Magisch wirksame Praktiken und Rituale werden vielfach in Religionen angewendet. Dabei geschieht dies für Gläubige häufig unbewusst, durch verschiedene Rituale und Gebete.
Auch die heutige Hypnose soll aus der magischen Tradition entstammen, sie arbeitet mit dem Unterbewusstsein und beeinflusst dieses.
Viele Zirkel, Logen, Neuheiden und Kulte wie Hexen wenden Magie an und lehren sie. Unter diesen sind wohl die meisten ehrenhaft und harmlos.
Die "Macht der Gedanken" zu nutzen ist eine magische Praktik, da sie darauf abzielt, die Wirklichkeit über den Hebel der Gedankenkraft zu beeinflussen.
Tantra, das immer mehr Menschen für sich entdecken, war ursprünglich eine spirituelle Erkenntnis-Praktik. Tantra wird aber vielfach auch magisch angewendet zur Manifestation und Vertiefung einer Bindung an den Wunsch-Partner. Mit diesem (manipulativen) Zweck ausgeübt wird Tantra zu Sexualmagie gezählt. D

Some incels #sexist #fundie reddit.com

Re: just call a suicide hotline bro. they’ll help you! []

image

(WailingWhalesInWales)

These seem like well-adjusted people.

Here's a copy paste edit of a comment I recently made:

I honestly believe that ITcels are lower intelligence than average though. Their complete lack of ability to form arguments and use logic is actually outstanding. Whenever you engage with an ITcel, it's like fighting a wild animal. They just foam at the mouth and shit everywhere. Even within their own community they will upvote comments that are blatantly irrational or paradoxical.

When you consider that the majority of ITcels are suffering from mental disorders such as bipolar, schizophrenia, and transgenderism, it makes sense. If you don't believe me, you can see this for yourself by briefly clicking through random users in any IT thread and check out their active communities/brief post history. The most hilarious (and highly prevalent) archetype among them is the soycucks who have outright misogynistic or alt right coping (such as the_donald--a subreddit that blackedsigma has in his active community list) post histories. You can literally see their internal mental battle between hating women and being a whiteknight cuck. These people are not in a stable mindset.

(Anormalregularperson)

They want to live up to their culture’s idealization of the word “good” more than they are able to be curious about what is real. They are more attached to the idea of “good guys” and “bad guys” than they are attached to the desire to know what is true.

That’s why their capacity for logic and reason is very poor, while their will to make fun and shame is very advanced. Lots of them are literally living the truths and realities that are presented here, but because these facts make them uncomfortable or stimulate intense cognitive dissonance within them they just deny it out of pure emotion, cherry picking the most ignorant comments and retreating into the self righteous comfort of feeling morally superior to others.

So many men today are literally involuntary celibate, or are very close to being incel that it is ridiculous....and it’s actually getting worse. The implications of this reality are unacceptable for the gynocentric, women are wonderful status quo. Rather than confront this in a rational way, many men would rather posture to show that they are attractive in some way (think of how common it is for men to fraud or exaggerate, especially online, their moral fashionableness, their height, their partner count, their penis size, how much money they make, ect) to feel good about themselves and like a “good”/“real” man to complete anonymous strangers on the internet.

As long as it makes them feel superior to shame anti-gynocentric thought, that’s exactly what they are going to do. They don’t care at all about what is logical or what is true, they only really care for their own image....the epitome of a feminized mindset and culture.

(doomercel)

IT soyboys are garbage who think they know it all throwing their bluepills out, but tbh, the roasties on IT are some of the most cruellest cunts in existence that definitely do get off on suicide and making men miserable. that's why IT foids come here and mock us.

(FAloner)

They are worse than us. Almost everyone of us wouldn't even harm a fly, meanwhile they talk people into suicide.

And no, inceltears, we're not encouraging suicide amongst ourselves, the rope meme is an expression of despair, helplessness, and understanding.

(TimeToMurder)

good thing I already 100% disregard normy society in every way and if I ever have problems I either deal with it myself or vent to obscure, hated internet subcultures. Would never call some faggot normie on a suicide hotline. Why? Probably just a low IQ douche obsessed with being perceived in a good light and has no real convictions.

(31cabbage)

Please remember, suicide hotlines are made for "lonely" mothers, frustrated family men, attractive teenagers who broke up with their 5th boyfriend etc etc.

They are not made for childless low value unattractive males. There is no guarantee of anonymity, don't make your life worse. Don't let them stamp you with a loony tag and use it against you later on.

(LyricThrowAgay)

See, there's really no reason why incels and their rhetoric should bother them. Accept, they're basically the lowest of the low themselves. So they need to hate you guys to make it through the day.

No different than coping racist in my opinion. Might as well find a way to profit of them.

(interruptor-)

They’d put us in concentration camps if they had a chance. Fuck law fuck morality we only want to kill ugly people who are bitter and got buttfucked by life.

Unironically diabolic people. I would never wish such things (perhaps to some serial killers, but this is not the case).

(redlionred)

hate those weaker than you. be a heartless savage but twist it to make it seem the weak deserve it. same logic is used by western white nations to attack and destroy weaker "so called uncivilized" non-white nations.

(youjustabattlerapper)

The only thing that can generate this type of hate is self loathing

They know they are incel and only by hating incels as viciously as possible can they "maintain" the lie that they are not one

Just smdh

(Carkudo)

That is pretty horrible, but it's a bit more understandable when you see what they're replying to:

https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/ao3lrz/if_she_says_no_scald_her/efypbso/?context=8&depth=9

Yeah dude, if abusing the already flawed mental health system to goad people you don't like into suicide can be "understandable" to you, you're a piece of shit and need to be isolated. You're disgusting.

How the hell do you privileged fucks even grow to be this evil? You get showered with love all your life and yet come out uglier than some criminals.

secret wiki #conspiracy #magick secret-wiki.de

Magic works and is used in many ways, at times unconsciously, at times deliberately.

Prestidigitators, stage magicians and charlatans contributed to the image of magic being banished into the realm of illusion, tricks, deception, sorcery and fairy tales. With this, more or less fear was created or control over magic conveyed through exposing tricks.

The original meaning and the sense of magic were lost in the process. For distinction, Aleister Crowley introduced the term "magick" to distinguish stage magic, illusionists and pseudo-sorcerers from real sorcerers. This article is about this kind of magic, as there is no German equivalent for the English word "magick".

imageThe four elements and the magic mirror are fundamental to magic.

Is magic real?

The average citizen does not "believe" in it or at least speaks little about it, but an astonishing number of people practice magic.

It is important to realise that magic works and is used on a daily base. Its power and its use can be great and delivers tangible results, although only few can actually manifest it on a large scale. But every disciplined mind can learn and practice it.

Some of the real practitioners do not want the masses to know that and how well magic works because they would lose this advantage in power. Therefore, they spread the belief that it is nothing but tricks and magic effects are the delusions of crackpots.

Recently, the knowledge of magic and its effects has been returning more and more to normal society, but generally, it is not talked about much.
During Christianisation, this folk-knowledge was lost and remains only rudimentary in wisdoms. Thus it was forc-ed to only be preserved and practiced in secret societies or family tradition. Since recent decades, ever better literature on the topic is becoming available, but the area is still strongly dominated by half-knowledge.

The very materialistically or scientifically socialised part of the populace stays firm in their belief in the non-existance of magic or connect magic with superstitious practices divorced from reality.

Demarcations

With “magical thinking”, which is also a stage of development in toddlers, one refers cause and effect selectively to oneself. This means they produce a strong correlation between his own powers of realisation and an event that could just as well have happened completely independently of his thoughts. Experience is dominated by egocentrism and the impression of being the centre of Creation, the point of origin of the universe’s power of Creation.

Such thought-magic is considered a pathological loss of reality in the manic phase in Manic-Depressives. Magical thinking however has another foundation, than gaining awareness and thus is only very limited in its effectiveness (generally just self harming).

Blessings are not viewed in the sense of magic. Here, the focus lies on the Divine, not on the own goals and intentions.

Healers can use magical rituals.

Fundamentals

Magic is the art and the science of bringing about changes through altered states of consciousness in accord with the will.
- Frater V.D.

Magic is the wilful influence over reality or as Bardon writes, the sacred science of all knowledge.
It works through various techniques to accomplish definitive goals. In this, magic applies the general Laws of the Mind.

Here, magic is a took and, taken by itself, completely neutral. It is just an option which the practitioner can use in any way. It can be compared with a knife, with which one can prepare food or harm someone else. Its effectiveness can be enormous with good magical schooling and correct usage and should not be underestimated.

A large part of the known effects of magic is based on strong projection of the magician upon the energy field of the addressed one (others or himself), so that his sensations and perception are altered. In this, the self-energy is frequently augmented through rituals or external energies. This can also lead to altered resonances within the different energy bodies of a person that attract corresponding experiences, for example what was once commonly known as a “bad luck” curse.

The options for working magic are diverse, for example:
* Training intuition and willpower
* Energetic work (for example with the 4 elements, energetic body training)
* Thought concentration and focussing
* Working with the subconsciousness
* Usage of foreign energies and powers (angels, (Light-) Masters, demons etc.)
* Working with symbols, archetypes and rituals (candles, visualisations, certain sequences of motion) or usage of amulets
* Spells of banishment or magic, invocations
* Tarot can be used as a way of magical initiation, but the Tarot is not to be equated to magic.
* Esoterics work magic, as long as the intention is to influence or manipulate reality energetically or through willpower. Generally speaking, esotericism is a path to enlightenment and does not contain magic. It does, however deal with the same foundational principles that form the foundation of magic, and for this reason it can result from it. The magical path to enlightenment is more concrete and practical in focus than esotericism, which is focussed on developing consciousness in any form.

An important principle of working magic is formulated in ”To Know, To Dare, To Will, To Be Silent”, which is one of the reasons why only few practitioners speak about it. Silence is part of the power of the manifestation, whereas speaking can disperse this power and expose it to opposed forces.

The practice of magic means to influence, to deliberately change things through force of will and at one's own discretion. Characteristically, the main focus here lies in the power of the human will – as opposed to ways of knowing that merely recognise that which is without using this insight: here, the usage is left to the Divine and techniques that optimise the bodily/subtle-energy conditions for the purpose of perceiving personal enlightenment (such as Yoga) are not generally understood as magic/magical forces.

More on occult, magical abilities also in the article Esotericism,
more on techniques in the article Energetic Self-Protection
more on the functional foundations in the article Laws of Life
and even more on magic in a FAQ on magieausbildung.de

White and Black Magic
White magic refers to magic used to heal or to help others. It also includes using magic to protect oneself or others. The intention is to use Light and “good”, benevolent forces. Most witch-cults call themselves white-magical. White magic is also used for the purpose of enlightenment.

Black magic refers to magic used in the pursuit of selfish and self-centered goals, for example in order to gain more money, property, power and success. It is seen as acceptable or even intended that others are harmed or attacked by this. A famous example are voodoo techniques that these days are still used mainly in African countries. Black-magical practices are mainly based on greed, envy, jealousy, anger/hatred and/or lust for power.

From this area stem the attempts to oblige foreign or entire societies into certain rituals to draw power from them. Often enough, these tactics are successful. It is common to wrap dark magic in a nice package and thus deceive. Not everyone who enters dressed in White has honest intentions. Black magic in particular likes to use deception and illusion and does so extensively. Furthermore, it leaves its followers in ignorance and wins through intimidation: in Adepts (those learning the way of magic), to stay dominant, and in the deceived “good” people (who frequently do not have any idea who they serve) simply so that they do what they would not do otherwise.

Tarot Card The Magician
imageThe Sorcerer of the Crowley Tarot in his three manifestations

In the Crowley Tarot Deck, publisher Urania has added all three versions of Frieda Harris’s drawings of the Magicician: the white magician (golden, left), the black magician (with a dark shadow in the background, right), and the magician transcendent (the juggler, at the centre. Crowley, however, had only authorised the sorcerer transcendent back then, which was the form to strive for.

The white and black magician are part of the dual system, of the dual plane, whereas the juggler has integrated and transcended the dual magical forces. He can use both forces – not according to his own volition but in accordance to the divine will.

Transcended dealing with the magical abilities is attributed to spiritual Masters and points to a difference between spiritual Masters and magicians.

Protection Against Magic
The best defence against unwanted magical influences is gaining awareness of the way magic works
In the article Energetic Self-Protection, various options for protecting oneself and locations are described. For a start, everyone can pay attention to the resonance. The ones most likely to deal with deliberate magical ham are people who work magic themselves or who did it in a potential previous life. Old connection can appear or be activated during certain procedures or stages of development. Especially white-magically oriented people frequently challenge nether spirits in polarity. This can lead to the magician being disturbed or influenced by their dark power or to the spirits trying to subjugate him.

imageNo one should move glasses, conjure spirits/ghosts or “play” with comparable things for amusement. If it is done “correctly”, the summoned and unused entity will easily turn against the practitioner.
When a dark guest enters the channel in an ill-conceived attempt at channelling, it is not trivial to get rid of him and successful help is rare.

Ultimately, such “games” result in an increased resonance towards magic of the lower or dark kind, which follows one like a shadow and adds a subliminal bad taste to all good works.

* Against general magical mass-manipulation, a clear mind, a lot of water and a healthy body help. It is always the unaware and weak minds that are susceptible.
* In clubs, it can be problematic if one is the target of magic while weakened (for example by alcohol, tiredness, consumption of drugs). In such a case, the magic can even be effective afterwards, but is normally resolved with a lot of pure water and self-centering. In exceptional cases, external help ie needed, for example by an essence.
* Similarly, harmful energies can be taken with oneself unconsciously at mass events, especially in places where magic is performed in ignorance. Unfortunately, this very fact is not known to the visitors of such events. Then this can also include smaller meetings. The knowledge on how to protect oneself or a good connection to the Divine (or to a divine person) are the best companions.

Positions of power can be named as a further endangered group. In such circles – reportedly in lodges – black magic is used frequently to accomplish economical goals.

Where are magical procedures performed?
* Magically effective procedures and rituals are widely used in religions. This frequently happens without the faithful being aware of it, via rituals and prayers.
* The hypnosis of today supposedly originated in the magical tradition as well, it works with the Subconsciousness and influences it.
* Many circles, lodges, neopagans and cults such as witches practice magic and teach it. Among them, most of them are likely honourable and harmless.
* Tantra, which more and more people are discovering for themselves, was original a spiritual method of enlightenment. However, Tantra is also used frequently magically for the manifestation and deepening of a bond with the wish-partner. When used with this (manipulative) purpose, Tantra counts as sexual magic. As targeted built-up sexual energy has a strong effect, it was used against demons in the past. However, it is advised against manipulation of the Kundalini energy because it can also cause damage if impurities are present.
One example of a magical sexual procedure is here – (in English) – with further types of magic here. (Submitter’s note: Links broken)
* Magical techniques are also used for manipulation of the masses.
* For example through religious symbols on vertices of power that change the base structure of the regional energy. (Christian crosses on the summits of mountains, energy intersections and churches, with the effect of binding the populace to the material)
* Symbols of corporations, ideologies and flags
* Modern advertising, as it utilises originally magical ways to deliver information (advertising) into the Subconsciousness. This is exactly what a magician does with himself, it is just that he determines the content and thus the goal himself.
* The massive proliferation, for example printed-on skulls and bones on many products have magical meaning in regards to the manipulation of society as well (corresponds to Saturn and among other things the preservation of existing structures)

Magic & (World) Politics
Secret, very powerful lodges work in the background and supposedly influence politics, banks and the economy. It is known that very many politicians, magnates, nobility, musicians and bankers in some orders and lodges. At times, they may be harmless, at times subverted and at times indeed part of a powerful network of lodges.

Whether secret lodges do indeed rule the world, but some things indicate their heavy influence. Especially the fact that this topic is avoided in movies and media is conspicuous. In documentaries, it is mostly Rosicrucians and Freemasons are portrayed (for example the membership of most US presidents in the Masonic Lodge). It is at least within the realm of possibility and should therefore worth consideration.
For the study of this topic, the following literature could be helpful:
* Banks, Bread and Bombs – Volume 1 by Stefan Erdmann
* Secret Societies and Their Power in the 20th Century 1 & 2 by Jan van Helsing
* Secret Societies 3rd War of the Freemasons by Jan van Helsing
* And The Truth Shall Set You Free – Part 1 by David Icke
* 334 ‰ Lie by H.M. v. Stuhl

Learning Magic
It is harder to cast magic than to protect oneself against it. It requires disciplines and constant practice, as well as continuous development of character. Another perspective assumes that we only remember, skills we already mastered in earlier lives or as a soul.
The practice of magical procedures is always tied into development of character and a form of therapy.
The short, easy way, is generally called the dark one.

imageIn black magic circles, the learning one (adept) will normally surrender his control completely and entrusts himself completely to a master or to a community. Those who want to leave such a circle apparently frequently suffer worldly or magically induced accidents.
*Various circles offer magical training. As most of them are structured pyramidically, the initiate does not know what the intentions of those ranking above him truly are. Disciples are often monopolised and pay either with (a lot of) money or with his energy and magical work. Interested people should therefore inform themselves in advance and select carefully.
* There are small circles and societies, some of them are public or can be found with a serious search.
* One core are the Laws which should be part of everyone’s basic knowledge and are by themselves completely uncontroversial. These laws, however, also find application within magic, as they represent an instruction for reality.
*Books inform about the methods up to self-training via literature.

* School of High Magic by Frater V.D.
* The Way To The True Adept by Franz Bardon
* Transcendental Magic: Dogma and Ritual of High Magic by Eliphas Levi

Original German Magie wirkt und findet in vielfacher Weise Anwendung, teils unbewusst, teils absichtlich.

Taschenspieler, Bühnenzauberer und Scharlatane haben dazu beigetragen, das Bild von Magie in das Reich von Illusion, Tricks, Manipulation, Betrug, Zauberei und Märchen zu verbannen. Damit wurde mehr oder weniger Angst erzeugt oder durch Entlarvung von Tricks eine Beherrschbarkeit von Magie vermittelt.

Die ursprüngliche Bedeutung und der Sinn von Magie gingen dabei verloren. Zur Abgrenzung wurde daher von Aleister Crowley der Begriff "magick" eingeführt, der Bühnenzauberei, Illusionisten und Pseudomagier von echten Magiern unterscheiden sollte. Der Artikel handelt von dieser Art Magie, wobei es keine deutsche Entsprechung gibt für das englische Wort "Magick".
Magie
Die vier Elemente & der magische Spiegel sind Grundlage der Magie

Gibt es Magie wirklich?

Der normale Bürger "glaubt" nicht daran oder spricht zumindest kaum darüber, jedoch wenden erstaunlich viele Menschen magische Praktiken an.

Es ist wichtig zu erkennen, dass Magie wirkt und täglich angewendet wird. Ihre Kraft und ihr Nutzen kann groß sein und liefert handfeste Ergebnisse, wenn dies auch nur wenige in großen Ausmaßen manifestieren können. Doch jeder disziplinierte Geist kann sie erlernen und anwenden.

Manche der tatsächlichen Anwender möchten nicht, dass die breite Masse erfährt, dass und wie wirksam Magie ist, weil sie dann diesen Machtvorteil verlieren würden. Deshalb verbreiten sie, es seien nur Tricks und Spinner würden sich magische Wirkungen einbilden.

Neuerdings kommt das Wissen um die Magie und ihre Wirkungen mehr und mehr wieder in die normale Gesellschaft zurück, dabei wird in der Regel wenig darüber gesprochen.
Durch die Christianisierung ging dieses Volkswissen verloren und ist nur noch rudimentär in Weisheiten verfügbar. Dadurch wurde es gezwungener-maßen, nur in geheimen Vereinigungen oder durch familiäre Überlieferung gepflegt, benutzt und erhalten. Seit einigen Jahrzehnten ist immer bessere Literatur zum Thema erhältlich, trotzdem herrscht noch viel Halbwissen in diesem Bereich.

Der sehr materialistisch oder wissenschaftlich geprägte Teil der Bevölkerung hält an der Nichtexistenz von Magie fest oder verbindet Magie mit realitätsfernen, abergläubischen Praktiken.

Wo wohnen die Dämonen?: Was Sie schon immer über Magie wissen wollten* von Frater V.D.

Abgrenzungen

Beim "magischen Denken", das auch eine Entwicklungsphase des Kleinkindes ist, bezieht der Mensch selektiv Ursache und Wirkung auf sich selbst. Das heißt, er stellt einen extremen Zusammenhang her zwischen seinen eigenen Verwirklichungskräften und einem Geschehnis, was ebenso-gut völlig unabhängig von seinem Denken passiert sein kann. Das Erleben wird beherrscht von Egozentrik und dem Eindruck, der Mittelpunkt der Schöpfung, der Ausgangspunkt der Schöpferkraft des Universums zu sein.

Als krankhafter Realitätsverlust gilt solche Gedankenmagie in der manischen Phase von Manisch-Depressiven. Magisches Denken hat jedoch eine andere Grundlage, als die Bewusstwerdung und ist daher nur sehr begrenzt wirksam (eher nur selbst-schädigend).

Segnungen werden nicht im Sinne von Magie betrachtet. Hier steht das Göttliche im Vordergrund, nicht die eigenen Ziele und Absichten.

Heiler können magische Rituale benutzen.
Grundlagen

Magie ist die Kunst und die Wissenschaft, mit Hilfe von veränderten Bewusstseinszuständen im Einklang mit dem Willen Veränderungen herbeizuführen.
Frater V.D.


Magie ist die willentliche Beeinflussung der Wirklichkeit oder wie Bardon schreibt, die heilige Wissenschaft allen Wissens[1]
Sie arbeitet mit verschiedenen Techniken, um definierte Ziele zu erreichen. Die Magie wendet dabei die allgemeinen Gesetzmäßigkeiten des Geistes an.

Die Magie ist dabei ein Werkzeug und für sich genommen völlig neutral. Sie ist nur eine Möglichkeit, welcher der Ausübende auf jede Art nutzen kann. Vergleichbar mit einem Messer, mit welchem man Nahrung zubereiten oder einem anderen schaden kann. Ihre Wirksamkeit kann bei guter magischer Schulung und korrekter Anwendung enorm sein und sollte nicht unterschätzt werden.

Ein Großteil der bekannten Wirkung von Magie beruht auf starker Projektion des Magiers auf das Energiefeld des Adressierten (andere oder er selbst), sodass dessen Empfindung und Wahrnehmung verändert wird. Die Eigenenergie wird dabei gerne mittels Ritualen oder Fremdenergien verstärkt. Das kann in den verschiedenen Energiekörpern einer Person auch veränderte Resonanzen hervorrufen, die entsprechende Erfahrungen anziehen, wie zum Beispiel früher landläufig ein sogenannter "Pech"-Fluch.
Hier beruht die gemachte Erfahrung nach dem Gesetz der Anziehung (Resonanz-Gesetz) nicht auf eigenen Glaubenssätzen sondern auf projizierten, in die Aura platzierten Elementen (Introjekte).

Es gibt vielfältige Möglichkeiten, magisch zu arbeiten, wie zum Beispiel:

Intuition und Willenskraft schulen
Energetisches Arbeiten (zum Beispiel mit den 4 Elementen, energetische Körperschulung)
Gedankenkonzentration und Fokussierung
Arbeiten mit dem Unterbewusstsein
Nutzen fremder Energien und Mächte (Engel, (Licht-) Meister, Dämonen u.ä.)
Arbeiten mit Symbolen, Archetypen und Ritualen (Kerzen, Visualisierungen, bestimmte Bewegungsabfolgen) oder Verwendung von Amuletten
Bann- oder Zaubersprüche, Anrufungen (Invokationen)
Tarot kann als magischer Einweihungsweg Verwendung finden, doch ist das Tarot nicht mit Magie gleichzusetzen.
Esoteriker arbeiten magisch, sofern die Absicht verfolgt wird, energetisch oder mit Willenskraft, die Wirklichkeit zu beeinflussen oder zu manipulieren. Grundsätzlich ist die Esoterik ein Erkenntnisweg und beinhaltet keine Magie. Jedoch befasst sie sich mit denselben Grundprinzipien, die der Magie zugrunde liegen, weshalb es sich daraus ergeben kann. Der magische Erkenntnisweg ist konkreter & praktischer angelegt als die Esoterik, die sich auf Bewusstseinsentwicklung ausrichtet, auf jedwede Art und Weise.

Ein wichtiger Grundsatz der magischen Arbeit formuliert sich in "Wisse, Wage, Wolle, Schweige", was mit dazu führt, dass nur wenige Ausübende darüber sprechen. Das Schweigen gehört zur Kraft der Manifestation, während das Sprechen diese Kraft zerstreuen und Gegenkräften aussetzen würde.

Die Anwendung von Magie bedeutet, zu beeinflussen, gezielt Dinge durch Willenskraft und nach eigenem Ermessen zu verändern. Kennzeichnend ist hierbei der Hauptfokus auf die Macht des menschlichen Willens - im Gegensatz zu Erkenntniswegen, die lediglich das anerkennen, was ist, ohne die Erkenntnis zu benutzen: die Verwendung wird hier dem Göttlichen überlassen und Techniken, die die körperlichen/feinstofflichen Bedingungen zur Wahrnehmung der eigenen Erkenntnis optimieren (wie Yoga), werden im Allgemeinen nicht als Magie bzw. magische Kräfte verstanden.

Mehr zu okkulten, magischen Fähigkeiten auch im Artikel Esoterik,
mehr zu Praktiken im Artikel Energetischer Selbstschutz
mehr zu funktionellen Grundlagen im Artikel Lebensgesetze
und noch mehr zu Magie in einem FAQ von magieausbildung.de
Weiße und Schwarze Magie

Von weißer Magie wird gesprochen, wenn damit geheilt oder anderen geholfen wird. Auch die Anwendung zum Schutz für sich selbst oder von anderen zählt dazu. Die Absicht ist, Licht und "gute", wohlwollende Kräfte zu nutzen. Die meisten Hexen-Kulte bezeichnen sich als weiß-magisch. Weiße Magie wird auch zu Erkenntniszwecken genutzt.

Von schwarzer Magie wird gesprochen, wenn eigennützige und eigenwillige Ziele verfolgt werden, wie beispielsweise mehr Geld, Besitz, Macht und Erfolg zu erhalten. Es wird in Kauf genommen oder gar beabsichtigt, dabei anderen zu schaden oder anzugreifen. Ein bekanntes Beispiel dafür sind Voodoo-Praktiken, die heute noch hauptsächlich in afrikanischen Ländern praktiziert werden. Die Basis schwarz-magischer Praktiken ist im wesentlichen Gier, Neid, Eifersucht, Ärger/Hass, und/oder Machtstreben.

Aus diesem Bereich kommen die Versuche, fremde oder ganze Gesellschaften auf bestimmte Rituale einzuschwören um daraus Energie zu schöpfen. Oft genug sind diese Taktiken erfolgreich. Es ist gängige Praxis, dunkle Magie in schöne Verpackung zu schlagen und damit zu blenden. Nicht jeder, der Weiß gekleidet daher kommt, verfolgt hehre Ziele.
Gerade die schwarze Magie arbeitet gerne und ausgiebig mit Täuschung und Blendwerk. Überdies lässt sie ihr Gefolge gerne in Unkenntnis und gewinnt durch Beängstigung: bei Adepten (lernende des magischen Weges), um überlegen zu bleiben und bei den geblendeten "guten" Menschen (welche oft nicht einmal ahnen, wem sie dienen) schlichtweg, damit sie tun, was sie sonst nicht täten.
Tarotkarte Der Magier
Der Magier des Crowley-Tarot in seinen drei Erscheinungs-Formen

Im Crowley-Tarot-Deck hat der Urania-Verlag seit 1986 alle drei Versionen von Frieda Harris' Zeichnung des Magieres beigefügt: den weißen Magier (goldfarben, links), den schwarzen Magier (mit einem dunklem Schatten im Hintergrund, rechts) und den transzendenten Magier (den Jongleur, in der Mitte). Crowley hatte damals jedoch nur den transzendenten Magier autorisiert, welches die anzustrebende Form war.

Der weiße und der schwarze Magier sind Teil des dualen Systems, der dualen Ebene, während der Jongleur die dualen magischen Kräfte integriert und transzendiert hat. Er kann beide Kräfte verwenden - nicht nach Eigenwillen sondern im Einklang mit dem göttlichen Willen.

Der transzendierte Umgang mit den magischen Fähigkeiten wird spirituellen Meistern zugeschrieben und weist auf einen Unterschied hin zwischen spirituellen Meistern und Magiern.
Schutz vor Magie

Der beste Schutz gegen ungewollte magische Beeinflussung ist die Bewusstwerdung, wie Magie wirkt.

Im Artikel Energetischer Selbstschutz werden verschiedene Möglichkeiten beschrieben sich und Räumlichkeiten zu schützen.
Grundsätzlich kann jeder die Resonanz beachten. Wer am ehesten mit bewussten magischen Schädigungen zu tun hat, sind Menschen, welche selbst magisch arbeiten oder dies in einem möglichen Vorleben taten. Alte Verbindungen können auftauchen oder aktiviert werden bei bestimmten Praktiken oder Entwicklungsstufen. Besonders weiß-magisch orientierte Menschen fordern in der Polarität gern niedere Geister heraus. Dies kann dazu führen, dass der Magier von deren dunkler Macht gestört oder beeinflusst wird oder die Geister versuchen, ihn zu unterwerfen .
Ausrufezeichen.png
Niemand sollte zur Belustigung Gläser-rücken, Geister beschwören oder vergleichbares "spielen". Wenn es "richtig" gemacht wird, richtet sich die gerufene und ungenutzte Wesenheit leicht gegen den Anwender.

Kommt bei unüberlegten Channeling-Versuchen ein dunkler Gast in die Leitung, wird man diesen nicht mehr ohne weiteres los und erfolgreiche Hilfe ist rar.
Letztlich entsteht durch solche "Spiele" eine verstärke Resonanz zur Magie der niederen oder dunklen Art, die einem wie ein Schatten folgt und allem gutem Handeln einen unterschwelligen schalen Beigeschmack beifügt.

Gegen allgemeine magische Massenbeeinflussung hilft ein klarer Geist, viel Wasser und ein gesunder Körper. Anfällig sind immer eher die unbewussten und schwachen Geister.
Problematisch kann es in Clubs sein, wenn man geschwächt (zum Beispiel durch Alkohol, Müdigkeit, Drogenkonsum) Ziel von Magie wird. In so einem Fall kann die Magie sogar noch nachher wirksam sein, erledigt sich aber in der Regel durch viel reines Wasser und Selbstzentrierung. Im Ausnahmefall braucht es fremde Hilfe, zum Beispiel durch eine Essenz
Ebenso können durch Massenveranstaltungen schädigende Energien unbewusst mitgenommen werden, besonders an Orten, an welchen in Unkenntnis magisch gewirkt wird. Leider ist es genau dann den Besuchern solcher Veranstaltungen häufig nicht bewusst. Das kann dann auch kleinere Treffen mit einschließen. Das Wissen darum, wie man sich schützt oder eine gute Anbindung ans Göttliche (oder an eine göttliche Person) sind die besten Begleiter.

Als gefährdete Gruppe können noch Machtpositionen genannt werden. In diesen Kreisen wird - angeblich von Logen - öfter schwarze Magie angewandt, um wirtschaftliche Ziele zu erreichen.
Wo werden magische Praktiken ausgeübt?

Magisch wirksame Praktiken und Rituale werden vielfach in Religionen angewendet. Dabei geschieht dies für Gläubige häufig unbewusst, durch verschiedene Rituale und Gebete.
Auch die heutige Hypnose soll aus der magischen Tradition entstammen, sie arbeitet mit dem Unterbewusstsein und beeinflusst dieses.
Viele Zirkel, Logen, Neuheiden und Kulte wie Hexen wenden Magie an und lehren sie. Unter diesen sind wohl die meisten ehrenhaft und harmlos.
Die "Macht der Gedanken" zu nutzen ist eine magische Praktik, da sie darauf abzielt, die Wirklichkeit über den Hebel der Gedankenkraft zu beeinflussen.
Tantra, das immer mehr Menschen für sich entdecken, war ursprünglich eine spirituelle Erkenntnis-Praktik. Tantra wird aber vielfach auch magisch angewendet zur Manifestation und Vertiefung einer Bindung an den Wunsch-Partner. Mit diesem (manipulativen) Zweck ausgeübt wird Tantra zu Sexualmagie gezählt. D

Paul Dowdy #fundie newscientist.com

science confirms that life cannot arise from non-life SO= where did humans, animals,plant life come from? And science says there has to be a cause and effect so whats the cause. If a scientist could tell me that he knows where everything came from then i would believe that the bible is fake. but science will never be able to make sence think about it you keep coming back to how did it get started and science has no starting prosess for life. you cant take nothing and nothing and a little bit of nothing and put it togeter in a lab and creat anything. science dont even know how a cubit foot of space is created you know that stuff you walk threw ,air is in it ,your house is in it ,the earth is in it. you cant tell me space is just free theres no formula no math to figure it out. If you use worldly logic it just dont make sence you know science. the only logical answer is the unlogical one to use that something magical created everything wich would be god. Oh yeah i belive in the bible but i belive that it is older than alot of people do. The bible does say that the world is round spear mean round. and the the bible saying things like i will go to the end of the world doesnt mean they thought is was flat we still say that phrase today. and the bible knew that befor we did. the bible knew that there were spings in the bottom of the ocean and we didnt discover it until like 1970. Even if im wrong why would anyone want to live knowing that they are just going to die in that case i dont mean anything life is all for nothing. or you can beleve and get saved and you still dont have to live a sin free life thats why jesus died on the cross. you have nothing to lose if you beleve. and if you dont beleve you have nothing to gain even if the bible and god was not ture.

Lance Welton #fundie vdare.com

If there’s one thing that unites wealthy Leftists, it’s the need to pretend they are compassionate.

And there are few better ways of doing this than campaigning against the death penalty.

Increasingly, Leftists take advantage of modern technology to do this: Activist groups like the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty have created a virtual cottage industry geared toward virtue-signalling on the death penalty. They use their websites to direct the bleeding hearts to the next execution site, so they can launch a protest rally.

Cutting-edge research, however, reveals just how fantastically ironic this is. It seems that without the death penalty there’d be no internet, no television; in fact, very little civilization.

The first scholars to develop this king of all Left-triggering ideas were Canadian anthropologist Peter Frost and the late University of Utah anthropologist Henry Harpending. They published their landmark research in 2015 under the title Western Europe, State Formation, and Genetic Pacification in the journal Evolutionary Psychology.[PDF]

It was a truly ingenious argument.

When Europe became Christian, the death penalty was abolished. Right up until the beginning of the Middle Ages, people were left to settle their own disputes by fighting each other or demanding, from the state, that the murderer pay a fine for killing their relative. But, as Frost and Harpending put it, the Church gradually came to accept that, the "wicked" should be executed "so that the good can live in peace."

With biblical justification, more and more crimes became subject to the death penalty. By the High Middle Ages, every single felony (any crime serious enough to have traditionally warranted the confiscation of property) was met with the hangman’s noose.

Those sent to the gallows were almost always high-testosterone young men prone to violent crime. In fact, Frost and Harpending calculated that one percent of the male population were executed every generation throughout the Middle Ages. And another one percent were killed at the scene of the crime or died in fetid prisons awaiting trial or execution. So two percent of young men were eliminated every generation.

And because they tended to be young, this process meant that they had fewer children than if they hadn't been executed. Thus, they would have passed on fewer of their genes.

It’s here that Frost and Harpending perceptively draw their conclusion. Capital punishment must have changed the nature of European personality—by, in effect, culling out the psychopaths.

Criminality is strongly predicted by three key traits associated with psychopathology:

Low impulse control
Low altruism
Low mental stability.

These traits are at least 50 percent genetic. [See Personality: What Makes You the Way You Are, by Daniel Nettle, OUP, 2007]

The murder rate collapsed between the 14th and 20th centuries and they statistically proved that part of the reason for this was the continual killing of the most impulsive and disagreeable young males every generation. The pool of violent men essentially dried up.

Those who were executed were overwhelmingly poor, with poverty associated with poor impulse control and low altruism. They had to be extremely poor because, in England at least, if you could read, then you could avoid execution by claiming "benefit of the clergy."

Frost and Harpending are clear: Widespread execution led to the genetic "pacification" of Western Europe. It made people more cooperative, more forward-thinking, less impulsive . . . in other words more psychologically able to develop civilization. And as the late Canadian psychologist J. Philippe Rushton showed in his 1995 book Race, Evolution and Behavior, that it is the ethnic groups with these personality traits that develop civilization.

More recently, anthropologist Edward Dutton and Swedish psychologist Guy Madison have taken this insight further. In a 2018 article in the journal Evolutionary Psychological Science [Execution, Violent Punishment and Selection for Religiousness in Medieval England] they point out that this system of widespread execution would also have selected strongly for intelligence. Low socioeconomic status is predicted by low intelligence and it was overwhelmingly young, low SES men who met the hangman's noose. Low IQ predicts living for the now and not thinking about the future. And considering the dire consequences of breaking the law up until the 19th century, in England for example, you’d have to have been fairly stupid to do it.

And it is quite clear that national-average intelligence is the motor of civilization. In their huge 2012 study, Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen showed that average national IQ strongly predicts national levels of education, research and development, wealth, earnings, employment, lack of poverty, lack of crime, democracy, honesty, health, life expectancy, sanitation, openness to change, lack of religious extremism . . . the list goes on [Intelligence: A Unifying Construct for the Social Sciences].

But central to Dutton and Madison’s study is something which, on the surface, might seem rather counter-intuitive in terms of the importance of the death penalty to civilization. They use the same statistical methods as Frost and Harpending to show that widespread execution was partly behind English people becoming more religious between the Medieval Era and the 16th century.

They argue that the English definitely became more religious, as evidenced by higher and higher percentages becoming monks and nuns, while heresy and witchcraft, deviations from accepted practice, grew increasingly unacceptable. And they estimate that religiousness is about 40 percent genetic, based on twin studies, and is predicted by exactly the same characteristics that predict not being a criminal: high altruism, high impulse control, and high mental stability.

Religiousness is also associated with low levels of autistic traits. Dutton and Madison demonstrate that there is a degree to which autism is associated with criminality. So the Medieval system of executing almost all criminals also effectively involved curtailing the fertility of the least religious young men every generation.

This policy bore fruit in the 16th and 17th centuries, according to the two researchers, with wars based around religion.

However, it also had another consequence, which they don’t look at but which has been explored by the German biologist Gerhard Meisenberg in his 2007 book In God’s Image. Precisely because Europeans were so intensely Christian, they didn’t adopt contraception, something which all previous civilizations had done when they got to about the stage the West reached in the early 18th century. Once contraception was adopted, it was taken up by cleverer and more educated people and used more efficiently by them, due to their higher IQ and better foresight. This has eventually resulted in a negative associated between SES [Socio-Economic Status] /intelligence fertility. Since the early 20th century, stupidity has predicted having lots of children.

Meisenberg shows this is exactly what happened in Greece and Rome. But because of this religious rejection of contraception, it didn’t happen in the modern West until much later in our development. This meant that we could get to the Industrial Revolution before the positive correlation between IQ and number of surviving children, which you see in all primitive societies, went into reverse due to contraception.

So, in a roundabout way, widespread execution made us more religious. And, paradoxically, if that hadn’t happened, there’d be no websites telling when and where the next execution will be, so we can Virtue-Signal about the death penalty. IQ would have declined, and we would have returned to the Dark Ages, just like the Romans and Greeks and Muslims did before us.

Put it this way: In April 2017, Johnny Depp made his way to Arkansas to protest against the planned execution of seven murderers that month. However, if it wasn’t for the widespread execution of young criminals, it’s very likely civilization would never have progressed beyond the technology and morality of Pirates of the Caribbean.

some incels #sexist reddit.com

When a female joins the group of my online friends that I play vidya with every day after work and now everyone acts completely different and tried to subtly belittle each other for a 0.00001% chance of fucking her

image

(Salvador66)
Foids ruin male spaces. They need to mind their own business.

(throwawayirl3)
Reminder: pussy-hunting cucks will ruin male spaces before an actual female will

(TreesnCats)
But it's the females presence and unattainability that drives the men to do what they do, cucks are pretty normal people when you subtract women from the equation.

You’re giving women a LOT of power, do you realize this?

I ain't the one doing it. I was gonna amend my statement by saying yes, the people who give women this much power over them have issues.

Look we can't control what women do, but we have every right to be disgusted by men that fucking grovel and lick the ground they walk on

(AyeThatsAGoodNagger)
But the point is, most men are pussy-hunting cucks. You can’t blame them; it’s evolution. But they only become intolerable when they're activated by the presence of a woman. Women are the problem here. Video game groups should have a zero-tolerance policy for open women.

To find and impress a woman is evolution, to act like a baboon at the presence of a woman online that wants to play video games is cuckery.

It happens to almost everybody. The monkey part of your brain sees the 0.00001% chance and jumps on it. Lonely men will never not cuck if they think there’s even a small a chance they can get a gf. The key is to not let women play in the first place.

(batmansthediddler)

Why are you enabling the worst men among us. I thought the common argument here is that women are the "simplistic" ones. If men can't even fucking have enough self respect not to be pathetic that's on them

yeah no shit sherlock this is why all the cucked soyboys hate incels so much, it's because we have the self respect they lack and they can't seem to grasp that idea.

also why do you think inceltears is like 10x bigger than braincels? it's because of the massive amount of soyboys infesting this fucking place.

if you really think women are the only problem you got some thinking to do

(WhoopiCushionberg)
This is precisely why gender segregation is a good thing. Even the entrance of one female automatically and intrinsically changes dynamics to be less brotherly and more competitive. Same goes for women too

(livear)
Men get anxious and distracted when available women are around.

Women get anxious and distracted when available men aren't around.

(LateStructure)
THIS is the reason to not have women in the military. The media pretty much refuses to acknowledge this and diverts the argument around "ability." Just goes to show how subtle manipulation is.

(RacistNigga420)
This happens to me all the time. Seriously fuck women, they ruin even my gaming experience. Actually recently stopped playing a mmo because too much of this shit on my guild.

(StopCopingStartLDAR)
that’s probably because most men are playing MMOs to get away from their shit real lives. but women live on absolute tutorial mode, so if they need that escapism then they’re probably severely fucked in the head

(Dearjohn_)
Good post. I never really put any thought into it before (bitches be crazy, basically) but what you said makes complete sense. Women already get everything handed to them IRL and get validation just for existing, so they'd have little incentive to seek out escapism via virtual worlds unless there is something wrong with them.

(Tony_Danza_the_boss)
This happened to my friend group as well. And the foid still hasnt left and brags about all the guys shes fucked right in front of us but knows she will never fuck any of us. Ive tried getting my friends to kick her out but they all want to try and fuck her. It's been 2 years -_-

Filippovna #fundie therightstuff.biz

Be the Chad You Wish To See in the World

Marrying and having kids is one of the most arduous challenges our generation must face. Women are rushing to the edge of the cliff of their youth in droves, and falling to their ruin with a splatter at the bottom of their thirties, covered in bodily fluids, cellulite, and tattoos. Young men are seriously contemplating whether cartoons can be girlfriends, while the abandonment of monogamy and the tremendous risks of dating and marriage keep all but the top stratum of men, the Chads, from even chancing a relationship.

It is no wonder the word cuck hits such a nerve for so many. With divorce being initiated three times as often by women, resulting in her being awarded the children, and most of his income and his assets going towards her new family, the similarities are staggering. Even finding a marriageable woman comes with the high likelihood of her having a plethora of previous partners, men she bedded for passion and for fun, and having settled when she realized she needed to cash in her assets before it was too late.

Add to that the impending threat of demographic displacement, where White men have been granted the privilege of supporting other men’s families, as they are systematically bred out of existence, and it paints a picture of utter defeat to anyone who wishes to have a family of his own.

This is also why Chad receives so much bitterness and envy from the everyman. The highest caste of sexual fitness, Chad is a symbol of what most cannot have: access to the best women. Chad is stronger, cooler, more interesting, and most importantly, the only type of person impervious to many of the pitfalls of the sexual marketplace.

There have been varied approaches to this problem. One is for a man to go his own way, rejecting women altogether, and deciding to not play the game if the outcome is likely losing. The problem with that is he does not get to reproduce. Another approach is to look toward a certain uprising, hoping that sexual disenfranchisement reaches maximum capacity within one’s lifetime, with the multitudes of six-and-unders overhauling the status quo entirely, and sending women back in time, back to the kitchen, while raising monuments and statues which read: THE INSIDIOUS VAGINAL JEW - NEVER FORGET.

The problem, again, is that they will likely not get to reproduce. And even if they do, the minefield of modern marriage is a gamble that makes shooting up a sorority house look like an appealing way to leave the world in comparison. The only way to win, it seems, is to become Chad.

Chad is not an individual, but an archetype latent within all men, not any specific mould or make, but rather characterized by how victorious he is in winning the attention of women. He is the superman of the principal imperative in life, and our relationship to him is like a Rorschach test for how close one is to realizing his potential--anything from jealousy, to disdain, to ambition. He is the sexual Volksgeist of our generation, and much like the literary hero, represents the psychological and physical battle of the most rudimentary of life’s quests.

There is no anguish and resentment reserved for any type of man as there is to Chad. Few Wojaks cry bitterly when contemplating the disheveled genius or the legacy of the celibate inventor. As comforting as denial would be, having access to women of the highest quality and quantity is supremely important.

This means that in order to be a Chad, a man must be appealing to the nature of women. The same creatures who wear fishnets and lingerie in public holding signs that say, “STILL NOT ASKING FOR IT“ are the ones qualifying a man’s SMV, not other men. If the majority of women consider a man a 4 out of 10, a 4 he is. This is a pill so black it burns down its own neighbourhood for a new pair of Jordans.

What women want in a man is difficult to discern, as what women say they want and what women actually want are not just different but contradictory, but it can easily be defined as masculine, or in other words, useful to women.

To men, women are primarily sexual objects. An ideal woman is beautiful, fertile, sensual, and pleasant. This is for good reason, as the other qualities of a woman are generally unexceptional. She is physically weak, her intelligence tends towards the mean, and in most cases anything aside from giving birth, men can do better. A woman has little else to bring to the table on a reproductive level than her looks and fecundity. Men must fulfill a much greater range of qualifications in order to impress a woman.

To women, men are kind of like tools. This is why one of their most commonly used phrases in online dating in 'Looking For' is “can fix anything”. Women are social cultivators of the male ability to subvert the material world, and can rarely advance their social standing in life without riding on the back of a capable man. Women coast on the status and power of men, men do all the work, and women reward men with what they do as sex objects, mainly acquiesce, sometimes enthusiastically.

Chad is, in a way, a multi-purpose tool. He may be funny, goal-oriented, successful, wealthy, or even under 6’2. But he is some combination of traits that women find useful, and carry the potential to help propel her social standing in some way. The antithesis to Chad, then, is a man who is useless. Look to the behaviour of teenage girls for a demonstration of the uncivilized, uncensored reaction to a man who is seen as useless--revulsion, cruelty, or fear, sometimes even at a simple hello. To women, these men aren’t just undesirable people, they may not even be men, or even human.

An interesting study to highlight this point is "Rape From Afar: Men Exposing to Women and Children," in which an unwanted display from a man even in the form of flashing can "have a significant impact on their lives and can be interpreted...he could also rape or murder them." A lesser man even showing arousal in a woman’s general vicinity can make a woman perceive the threat of rape or death.

There are very few perks of being merely a mediocre man, either. He may get to marry and reproduce if he is lucky. He will spend the entire relationship being tested ruthlessly, on the off chance he will lose his grip and give her an excuse to find someone else who is more useful. Many women will not hesitate to climb onto the back of a great man, only to stand on his shoulders and climb higher once the opportunity arises. This is not a comforting idea, but such is the fate of the average man.

Feminist influence in government has proven nothing more than the fact that women will act like women even in circumstances where they are permitted to act like men. Social degeneration leading up to and caused by female-led policy, just like the dating scene, has become much like a harem, as big daddy government coerces resources from men and families and makes it rain on his loyal voter base.

Being an accomplished or honourable man by the standards of men has little real bearing on the realities of the current year’s sexual marketplace. We are in a dysgenic age in which the same demographic of people taking the feel-good flamethrower of uncontrolled third world immigration to Europe are the ones arbitrating who gets to reproduce. Men with valuable things to offer the next generation are being pushed out of the gene pool, or out of the lives of their own children. Counteracting this is an incredible feat of overcoming the odds, but the other options are even more grave.

Chad is the very embodiment of overcoming the odds. He may not have done so on purpose, or worked very hard for it, but he has succeeded in making women believe that he has value to offer them. Whether we like it or not, Chad is the hero of the story of our modern era. He wins. Any approach to this archetype outside of aspiration and the will to power is self-defeating. We are living in a dystopian sci-fi novel, and just like in any story, the jealous foil who attempts to murder the hero always loses.

James Casbolt/Michael Prince via James Rink #ufo #racist #conspiracy #psycho #sexist #homophobia supersoldiertalk.com

Note i don’t necessary adopt James Casbolt/Michael Prince’s belief system towards Women, Jews, and Black peoples but I feel he brings up some important points which makes this worthwhile to share.

Axioms of the Forth Reich

There exist five root biological forms in the universe from which all life-forms spring. All life in the universe originates from these five or is a combination of the five. The five are as follows-

1: Human
2: Canine/dog
3: Bird
4: Feline/cat
5: Reptile

The human form is the original form in the universe with the highest survival dynamics. In a competition of survival of the fittest the human form can be said to be the ‘strongest’.

Through physical tests conducted at facilities OP/OW ( Off Planet/Off World ) the canine form has the second highest survival dynamics behind the human form, with bird form behind canine, feline behind bird and reptile at the bottom of the chain with the lowest survival dynamics.

The bipedal reptile form was originally human. The bipedal reptile form is currently evolving back towards the human form.

Composite Human Aryan Evolution

The original form in the universe was a single white skinned human male. This life-form existed before all others. All life-forms spring from this original form.

Bipedal reptiles were genetically engineered by this human male. They were his first creation. Because of this an intimate relationship exists between human and reptile. More so than any other biological life-form in the universe.

At this point the original man created white skinned human females afterwards and the human race began.

The human race started as a combined white race. However it gradually lowered its survival dynamics by falling into subhuman races within the white race with different skin colours.

This occurred through human interbreeding with the animal races. I.E the black race was created through the following process-

The Luciferian Wars

The so called Luciferian wars in galactic prehistory caused the factioning of the original white human race into two sides. Every man and woman had to choose a side in the war. One group decided to wait and see the outcome of this war and then side with the winning faction. For their cowardness a long chain of events occurred that ended up with them being stranded on an unpleasantly hot planet covered in thick jungle.

Every male ended up dying through a jungle contagion. The females went insane and ended up doing what they always do when no human males are in their environment to stabilize them. I.E they started having sex with the animal that most resembles man. In this case the monkeys and gorillas of the jungle planet.

The black race was thus created through this interbreeding and black skinned humans have been having problems ever since. The black innately hates himself and his own skin colour because of this.

There is no reason for the white Aryan to hate the black. The black is simply a subhuman second class citizen with lower survival dynamics.

The black will simply evolve back towards a white skinned human as the human race puts itself back together again and geographical, genetic and weather conditions improve.
<…>
The Solution

We can indentify the two main enemies of the Fourth Reich and a paradise of existence as two main forces working against the plan-

1: The intelligent bipedal reptile who is fighting against evolving towards becoming a white skinned human form. Most reptiles are currently surrendering to the Fourth Reich.

2: The Jew- working alongside the first.

The Fourth Reich have currently taken over every government on the planet and all military and police forces have been indoctrinated with the Axioms of the Forth Reich released here for the first time in history for public perusal.

Enemies of said government are now as follows-

Homosexuals- The reptile species who goes against the survival dynamics of the human race engages in the practice of homosexuality. This life-form is a mixture of male and female as it has lost distinction and survival boundaries within this group.

Homosexuality is being promoted in society as an attack on the original male form and the propagation of the white race. Military prison camps are currently set up for homosexuals to engage in relearning.

Pedophiles- The reptile species who goes against the survival dynamics of the human race engages in the practice of pedophilia as it has lost distinction and survival boundaries within this group. They engage in a process of age regression when reaching advanced years and see the young as adults.

White Aryan woman engaging in practices against the human survival dynamics-

White Aryan woman must learn to become submissive to the Aryan male once again. The second form must learn to be submissive to the form that created it for harmony to take place.

Feminism and equality must once again be erased. Larger numbers of woman exist in the world than the superior male. After population reduction has taken place, polygamy will be reinstated as was done for German SS officers in World War 2. All surviving white males will control a community and act as Warlord for that community. Each Warlord will take multiple wives and begin to repopulate their designated areas with white offspring.

All surviving subhuman races and individuals OP/OW will be involved in colonies that will experience accelearted evolution towards the perfect Aryan human form.

All surviving dark skinned subhuman races will become white skinned humans. All bi-pedal alien forms whether they are canine, bird, feline or reptile will become white skinned humans. All canine, bird, feline or reptile life-forms will return to their natural state in the OP/OW colonies and will walk on all fours, fly or slither on their bellies.

Wulf Ingessunu #racist inglinga.blogspot.co.uk

At one level Yggdrasil is the White Tree of legend, and as such we can see that it represents the White Race, which today is being shaken, battered and beaten, threatened with its final destruction within decades. This is no accident, indeed it is a careful plan being executed by the Dark Forces that seek to destroy the White Race so that it can rule over a rootless, race-less mass of slaves. Make no mistake about it - this is genocide on a vast scale. It is White Genocide!

Anyone who recognises this and stands against such evil is seen to be a 'racist' by those who deem themselves to be 'anti-racist' (Anti-Racism is Anti-White). We are 'racist' because we recognise the threat to our Folk and are the ones who will stand up against this tyranny - and against the evil regime behind it. Yet we know that within the trunk of Yggdrasil are Lif and Lifthrasir - New Life, the seeds of the rebirth of our Folk. We know that there will be a rebirth of our Folk and that justice will be done.

We are threatened not only with the destruction of our culture and identity through mass immigration - mass invasion would be a better term - but also by the 'integration' of alien blood which will eventually destroy our gene-pool. The other threat to our survival is through violence which has been deliberately stirred against us. Coloured people have been conditioned to literally hate white people; they are conditioned to believe that we have exploited them, destroyed their culture, taken their lands and tried to destroy them. These lies have been put about by the very people responsible for doing these things - our people were mere tools in the game. No one hears about 'White Slavery' where over one million Europeans were taken slaves by Muslim Traders. No one seems to consider that whilst there was resistance against Black Slavery there were untold thousands of white women and children enslaved in the Satanic Mills of Northern England, working in horrendous conditions for long hours. The words of the State Tool, William Wilberforce, were heard above the truth stated by William Cobbett.

[...]

We are opposed to Zionism since it seeks to dominate the world and 'subdue it' (Genesis), but we are also opposed to Militant Islam that also seeks to dominate the world, and since some Muslims have openly said that this is 'their country' we oppose such a view since they had no hand in building this country, and have been here for decades - not thousands of years. Indeed, they were not asked to come here by the English People, they were forced upon us by the very people they are supposed to be fighting. England is named after the English - the 'Sons of Ing'. Because we oppose Zionism does not mean we support its enemies when they too seek our enslavement and destruction. We oppose all the forces that seek to take our freedom way, to take our land away from us, and to eventually destroy us.

Judaeo-Christianity was designed to 'tame the blond beast', to soften up the people so that they had no will to resist what was coming. But there are Wolves Amongst The Sheep! This is where the archetype of The Hooded Man comes into importance, since this is the Archetypal English Hero who not only fights oppression, but also fights against the outlanders who have taken our land and freedom by force or by stealth. The parallels between our times and the times when the Normans came should not be overlooked; rather than the Normans being the problem they had the same problem as we do, for it was the money-lenders who financed William the Bastard, and as today it was the money-lenders who called the tune then. It was these people who bled the English dry in order to pay the interest on their loans.

[...]

We should not be dejected about these times, nor wallow in self-pity for the state of affairs; we should be proud to live in these dark times, at the end of the Dark Age, because we have been chosen to lead the Last Battle upon Middle-Earth at the coming of Ragnarok, when the Bifrost Bridge breaks and the Hordes of Darkness cross into the Land of the Gods. We are fighting for the Man to Come and this has to be the driving-force for our struggle and our work. This is a Holy War not only for the survival of our Folk but also for the creation of a new Race of Man - the Aryan Race. Only through struggle can evolution take place, and only through this struggle can the new Race of Man appear upon Earth.

Wulf Ingessunu #fundie englishmovement.org.uk

What we have discovered here is that in ancient times and alien priesthood from the Middle-East infiltrated and subverted the Hyperborean Priesthood that existed here in England and then created a new and alien religion for the peoples of the Islands of the Mighty - the White Island. This would explain why the Roman Christian Religion took such firm hold upon certain sections of peoples such as the Welsh and Irish, but this did not take hold of all of the peoples of these islands - for some remained heathen. This would also explain why Vortigern is always shown under the symbol of the White Dragon rather than the Red Dragon which is a Christian Symbol.

The stumbling-block to understanding that the Anglo-Saxons rejected the 'work of the Giants' lies in the meaning of the word 'Giant' which (I would imagine in respect to the Old English text) is a translation of the Old English Eoten which is the English version of the Norse Jotun. The Jotun (we shall use this term in all cases except when rendering an Old English text into modern English) were the Forces of Chaos and Disorder who undermined the work of the Gods - the Holy Powers. If we replace the modern interpretation of the name (Giant) with the original - Jotun - then we see the reason why the Anglo-Saxons rejected their monumental buildings and their religious practices which they saw as the work of their great enemy - the Forces of Darkness and Chaos.

I am not suggesting that every member of every Anglo-Saxon tribe understood this, any more than every one of the mass of people today understands who the Jotun really are. This was down to a select (Elect) line of priesthood that guided the English Folk in their destiny and wyrd. This was what Guido von List named The Armanen and which were the Priesthood of Irmin (the God of the Arya). When Hengest and Horsa led the English as Saxon Chieftains they did so as the Divine Twins, sent by the Gods to fulfil a Divine Mission - and that mission was to wage a Holy War against the Jotun and their growing power (through Judaeo-Christianity) and to free their Folk (the Germanic Folk here in England or Anglia) from the thraldom of an alien religion and priesthood.

Were the Anglo-Saxons (our ancestors) so primitive and stupid that they believed 'Giants' (in the modern meaning of the word) built these great structures, and not the Romans, who they must have known to be the builders? Of course not. They knew full well that the Romans had built them, but they also recognised the degeneracy of the Roman Empire at this time, and that Rome was ruled by the Forces of Darkness and Chaos - the Jotun!

If our Anglo-Saxon ancestors of the time were to get hold of a 'Time-Machine' and project themselves into the future, into our times, what would they think of the great glass and steel structures of the massive cities that have spread across the Land of England? We who understand know these to be alien to our own culture, and that they murder the Soul of our Folk. They break the bond of Blood and Soil and create a world of illusion and of falsehood. Man is taken from Nature and becomes little less than a machine. They would see these unnatural works as the works of the Jotun! Just as we today know who is behind these massive cities and their degenerate buildings. They are the work of the Jotun!

[...]

If I am right, and I see no reason why what I have said does not make sense, then this battle has continued throughout the ages, and certain key figures have incarnated upon the Earth to fulfil a Divine Mission and an archetypal myth, leading their lives as an archetype and waging the same Holy War against the Forces of Darkness and Chaos - the Jotun. In the last century another AEtla led the 'Huns' against the Jotun and their power, and in the process brought to an end the Age of Christ and paved the way for another to arise in our era and finish the job of defeating the Jotun-Power and ushering in a new Golden Age.

SIB (aka TimRattayGotScrewed) #sexist fstdt.com

LOL, the replies in this thread actually support MGTOW theory. All women are psychopaths if you piss them off, and you need to sleep with one eye open? Gee, I wonder why these men aren't excited to sign up for this!

"Nurse porn isn't representative of reality. What you're describing here is a bimbo in a naughty nurse outfit. Also, I doubt it would be her fault if she couldn't hold an even remotely intelligent conversation with you."

Well, I know two blonde, white female nurses in real life. They both got knocked up by black guys in high school. And oh yeah, they were, like, real geniuses, let me, like, tell you.


"Also, bonus points for the subtle homophobic rhetoric. At last we know where do gay men fit in their deranged little worldview."

I don't see subtle homophobic rhetoric. Looks like you're just imagining things like a typical SJw.

"That "effeminate boyfriend" is probably cumming his brains out with his cute girlfriend. I doubt he'd complain."

I think he would complain after getting dumped for a woman.

"Yadda yadda yadda, recycled alt-right lingo and manuresphere terminology, with added scorn for ugly women. Give me something that doesn't bore me out of my mind."

I don't see any added scorn. I just see an honest description. Again viewed through the SJW prism. I guess you're just offended by the word, "ugly," itself. As the late George Carlin put it..."physiologists have actually started to refer to ugly people as, 'those with severe appearance deficits.'" Should have known...that was in 1990 and now it's The Current Year.

"I really don't get what's the problem with someone who's into dainty, femmy things. It's a taste like any other. I thought your ilk preferred women to be traditionally feminine, and spent day in day out crying about how trashy "Stacies" are?"

As usual, you can't even stay on topic. The thread is about how all women fall into archetypes. It's not, "durr hurr, 3.5 billion people, durr hurr. Dere's someone for everybody as long as you stop engaging in my soggy knee, durr hurr." Once you encounter and recognize the several different archetypes, if you don't like any of them, there's nobody out there for you.

"High fuckin talk coming from you, considering all y'all's griping about how precious virginity is. Do you think you can just shove a fire hydrant in there at the first time without any pain? Human anatomy F-. Sit down."

Wow, this thread is sailing over your head by a country mile.

"Niiiiice. You're right back to the usual incel shit; if sexism and homophobia wasn't enough to melt any woman's panties in your immediate vicinity, you're a fucking racist as well. Keep going my little dude, you're sure to land a femoid that way."

Racism is the belief in a racial hierarchy, i.e. certain races are superior to others. That is not what is being said here. All races of women are bashed equally here. The ones being bashed are women, not blacks. Try to keep up with your small, woman brain.

"Something tells me this guy is white."

Reverse the races in that sentence and suddenly you would be called a "racist." It's all about privilege points and what percent victim you are.

"Note how he included at least two specific "types" for each ethnicity up to this point. But Asians can only be small and cute but also treacherous, that's apparently the only kind of Asian girl to exist. Yellow Fever and Yellow Peril, two tired stereotypes for the price of one! Who could possibly refuse such an offer! /s "

Ever heard of the word, "cultural?" You dishonah family.

International Center Against Abuse of Covert Technologies #ufo #crackpot #magick worldwidetargeting.com

The main goal of the Victim-Victimizer mind control and software is based on Divide and Conquer Tactics and intentionally programming humanity to think thoughts of violence and hatred about others to promote the Archontic Deception Behaviors and their unethical AD Strategies as a fear based control belief system. As humans feed their power into these AD systems and hierarchies based upon violence, lies and deception, the deception is covered up and its fabricated reality becomes an anti-human value system to enforce the Death Culture. As long as humans think thoughts and maintain belief systems of the Predator Mind, and feed into the alien software programs, they create victims and victimizers and spread more hatred and violence into the earth grids. Humans exchange roles between acting as the archetypal victim, and then because they do not want to be a victim anymore, they switch their role to become a victimizer. Both are forms of perpetuating inner and/or outer violence.

When we undergo the Ascension process, we undergo the process of Ego/Personality dismantling and a continued transformation to align our Consciousness to our spiritual self or Higher Self. During Ascension Stages of development or Kundalini awakening we undergo a form of psycho-spiritual crisis called the Dark Night of the Soul. During a variety of encounters of the "Dark Night" we will face issues of being a victim, or being a victimizer, or have either of these roles projected to us from other people or groups. As we develop personal discernment and gain clarity with these Imposter Spirit forces, we are able to synthesize these forces into harmonious patterns thereby neutralizing them. However, these victim archetypes are deeply enmeshed in the human psyche and Unconscious Mind which form the Negative Ego and are a Mind Control program that is operating in the world today.

The goal is to free one's mind from bondage to these Imposter Spirit forces as well as free one's thoughts, therefor freeing the mind to focus on the light of the soul.

One may see these patterns carry over with child sexual abuse, which is an Archontic NAA Strategy developed to traumatize humanity. A child who is sexually abused, grows into an adult who abuses children. The role of the victim and victimizer is interchangeable and promotes violence, hatred, trauma, abuse and misery which set the person up into Addiction.

This is a no win situation that is anti-human belief system, and is a Mind Control psychotronic warfare that is designed to spread hatred, division, and self enforcement of human enslavement set up by the Controllers. Educate yourself.

​Victim-Victimizer or VV programming, the unfortunate result is that unstable people that have not done much mental or emotional clearing, have built up hidden pain and trauma, that are easily controlled and manipulated by dark forces to play out their fears in the 2D or lower mind. These kind of people go unconscious and flip out very easily, are very weak spiritually, have low Impulse Control and are at high risk for dark portal use or Possession. The NAA and dark forces will groom and manipulate these unstable people to attack you directly. We all must be aware of this and take steps to defend ourselves by not allowing these kind of people to get too close to us or in your home (when possible). The problem is they will find ways to infiltrate peoples weakness, and work them slowly to flip out, without any kind of apparent reason.

Recently, we had this happen in our community, and over the last week I had a Black Faced Reptilian with Yellow eyes showing me that it was he that was responsible for creating all the recent energetic chaos in our group, they tend to be incredibly arrogant and they like to leave their mark, which is a way to say F-you. So it is good to remember, these unstable, confused and weak people are used as pawns in the larger war game, and its not the person most of the time consciously understanding what they are doing, but these forces manipulating the person to act totally bizarre and even insane. I have had these experiences happen so many times, that unfortunately I do not think this dark strategy is going to end anytime in the near future. So as we gain more experience with dark attack and accept it as a reality on his earth, the process actually gets easier. The biggest challenge is the energetic drain and diversion it creates from taking you off course (timelines), which is their primary motivation.

W. F. Price #fundie the-spearhead.com

The Palin family is in the news again for a dustup at a Wasilla house party, embarrassing themselves and Alaska yet again. This time, the fight was over a remark about Willow Palin, which triggered a brawl that involved young single mother Bristol throwing punches at a young man. The entire clan got into the fight, which ended with two of the Palin men injured (not seriously).

[...]

I know this type of feminist all too well. In fact, if anyone is responsible for my strong opposition to feminism, it is exactly these kinds of people, with whom I very unfortunately have had a lot of experience. Not so much the enfeebled, overeducated, passive aggressive East Coast types, but rather the real, Western shoot-to-kill and take no prisoners feminist archetype; the kind of women who “go to war” during divorce by using methods calculated to have at least a chance of killing their opponent. I mean real killing, like, dead.

Given Palin’s continued influence in the Tea Party, I have to conclude that the Tea Party is not in the least anti-Feminist, and in fact may be somewhat inclined to support the lawless, family-wrecking type of feminism practiced by the Palin clan. Unfortunately, the mainstream Republicans are not anti-feminist either, although they may be a bit more moderate than the Palinites. What this means is that there is no one party that supports men’s interests; only less bad parties and candidates.

[...]

In the meanwhile, if you’re a young man or have a young son, keep a close lookout for anti-male patterns of behavior in families regardless of political affiliation.

Here are a few important warning signs:

1. Any allegations against previous boyfriends, husbands, or even in some cases brothers and fathers, even if they didn’t result in any litigation or arrests.

2. Look at families’ divorced friends. If they are mainly women, that’s a problem. It means they chose sides. If there is bad blood between them and the ex-husbands of their friends, stay away.

3. They have lesbian friends. This one is self-explanatory.

4. The women display a sense of entitlement to men and men’s income yet feel no reciprocal sense of family duty or loyalty.

Wulf Ingessunu #fundie inglinga.blogspot.co.uk

[On a post analysing the story of Ask and Embla from Norse mythology]

We can see not one jot of evidence in our Northern Myths to prove that Aryan Man (Northern Man) evolved from an ape. Nor do we find Aryan Man created from the mud of the earth as in the Hebraic texts. Aryan Man was created from the noble Ash-Tree which reaches towards the heavens - this is symbolic of the essence of the First Man into which the Flame of Life was placed. The vegetative basis of Man was formed from the noble tree that grows in the Earth, but which reaches to the heavens and the Gods. This was why Iggdrasil is the White Tree and represents the White Race at this level. Yes, it has been battered and beaten, decaying and is dying, but it will not pass away completely, for it will be regenerated after Ragnarok - or a 'sapling' of the White Tree will be found, as happens in the Lord of the Rings.

[...]

[bolded, italicised, and underlined in the original]

This post is of extreme importance since the details within it totally disprove the idea that Man (Aryan Man) descended from the apes or from mud-created beings. This is the key to arguing the origins of our Folk and to countering the lies propagated by the Great Enemy. The 'Aryan Race' may not exist as an entity today, but it is an archetype and it is a projection for the future. It is something to strive and struggle for, and in doing so go 'beyond' the mankind of today, to 'overcome' the 'man' of today, to reach to the stars for a new Race of Man. Origins are important, just as is Destiny.

Unknown author #fundie creationworldview.org

Evolutionists do not want us to teach in our public schools the science that shows the validity of creation. They want us to teach only their (with apologies to Rudyard Kipling) "Just So Stories."

Personally, I believe that we should teach evolution side-by-side with creation giving equal scientific emphasis and have our students learn to think critically. Let us show them both and allow them to decide for themselves which one they will believe because origins is a faith position. Evolutionists reject this two model approach to teaching about origins because they inherently know that they will lose every time.

If they will not allow the teaching in our public schools of the science to support creation and adamantly defend the teaching of evolution only, that is fine with me - as long as we teach the students more about evolution than the evolutionists do. If we teach students ALL about evolution then they will realize that evolution is intellectually bankrupt.

The solution to evolution is education!

Please allow us to teach the students the truth about the implications of the Laws of Science, such as the First and Second Law of Thermodynamics, and how these Laws disprove evolution. Please allow us to teach the truth about the whole and complete nature of natural processes, like photosynthesis and metamorphosis, and how these could not possibly come into existence by random chance. Please allow us to teach the truth about what is really in the ground, like the out of order layers and polystrate fossils, as opposed to what evolutionists say is in the ground.

Please allow us to teach the truth about the hoaxes and frauds that have been authenticated and perpetuated by evolutionists then later had to be retracted. Please allow us to teach the truth about: Piltdown Man, Java Man, Peking Man, English Peppered Moths, the Horse Series, Pithecanthropus alalus, Galapagos Finch Beaks, embryonic recapitulation and the Monera.

Please allow us to teach the students the truth about how the acceptance of evolution is the foundational justification to promote: human racism, homosexuality, abortion, euthanasia, lawlessness, pornography, and all the other immoral and unethical activities within our society.

Yes, I am convinced! We need to teach more about evolution in our public schools, not less!

With this admonition in mind, I want to give you a Primer on the Scientific Reasons that Evolution is Wrong. The following are only thirty basic points and are by no means the total list that we might make. This is just a list that you may refer to when you want a quick way to look up what is wrong with evolution.

1. The evolution of one kind into another kind is not happening in a measurable way in the present, nor can it be proven to have occurred in the past.

2. No new kinds of organisms are being observed coming from previously existing organisms. (We discover new kinds that we have never cataloged before, but this only shows our ignorance of their existence.)

3. No new structures or organs have been observed coming into existence. All observed structures or organs are fully formed when first observed. (The only observed changes to current structures or organs come from their decay and degradation.)

4. There are distinct gaps between the known kinds of organisms. One kind is not observed to change into another kind. We do not observe the "missing links" because they are missing, not there, don't exist.

5. Life only comes from life and reproduces after its own kind. Life does not come from non-living material. Life does not spontaneously generate itself.

6. Mutations, the supposed driving mechanisms of evolution, are random in nature and are neutral or harmful. They do not accumulate beneficially. Mutations produce the wrong kind of change and will not provide for the upward progressive increase in intelligence or complexity required by evolutionists.

7. We observe stasis, not change, in nature. Extinction is a proof of creation. We do not find change in the fossil record nor can we measure it in the present. Animal and plant kinds that exist today retain the same appearance but are smaller in size than their known predecessors.

8. The fossil layers are not found in the ground in the nice neat clean order that evolutionists illustrate them to be in their textbooks. There is not one place on the surface of the earth where you may dig straight down and pass through the fossil layers in the order shown in the textbooks. The neat order of one layer upon another does not exist in nature. The fossil bearing layers are actually found out of order, upside down (backwards according to evolutionary theory), missing (from where evolutionists would expect them to be) or interlaced ("younger" and "older" layers found in repeating sequences). "Out of place" fossils are the rule and not the exception throughout the fossil record.

9. Polystrate fossils, fossils which penetrate two or more layers of the fossil record (most often trees), are common throughout the fossil record. In rare cases even large animal skeletons have been found in vertical position rather than in a horizontal position.

10. Life forms are found to be complex even in the "oldest" layers of the fossil record. For example, various species of Trilobites are found to have very sophisticated eyesight. Yet evolutionists say that these creatures supposedly evolved into existence when the first multiple celled life forms began to evolve some 620 million supposed years ago.

11. Nature does not provide us with the proof for the "Tree of Life" so glibly talked about by evolutionists. We do not find life starting as simple and then branching upward and outward as it becomes more and more complex. We do not find that life forms follow the pattern of a single tree trunk with many branches. The physical evidence provided by nature gives a picture of an extremely large orchard with all plant and animal types represented from the beginning with their own individual trunks and branches producing the variations within kinds that we have today, but no new kinds progressing from previous kinds.

12. There are no transitional forms found in the fossil record. In spite of all the reports people may have heard, we have never found the fossil of a plant or an animal which is a true intermediate form. The "missing links" are missing because they are missing.

13. Be wary of artists renderings. An artists depiction, conception or illustration is imaginary. Simply because we see an artists illustration of a cow becoming a whale doesn't make it so. Human desire and imagination are not evidence.

14. Ancient man was not primitive. Ancient human cultures had more complex languages than we do today. The engineering feats of the past cultures are well recognized and in some cases have not been duplicated in modern times. There never was a Stone Age, Bronze Age or Iron Age. Man has used stone, bronze and iron tools in all ages of past human activity. Indeed, there is nothing new under the sun.

The observed Laws of Science contradict the various theories of evolution.

15. The law of Cause and Effect not only describes that for every effect there must have been a cause, it also tells us that the cause must be greater than the effect. No one can create anything greater than themselves. You do not get an increase in intelligence or complexity without the input from a greater intelligence.

16. The First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics work contrary to evolutionary belief. The First Law of Thermodynamics (The Law of Energy Conservation) proves that the universe cannot be the reason for its own existence. According to the First Law the universe cannot have been anything less than it is, and if it cannot have been anything less than it is, it had to come into existence whole and complete. If the universe came into existence whole and complete, then it had to be created. Simply adding energy to a system will not cause an increase in intelligence or complexity. The addition of undirected energy to a system accomplishes nothing, except possibly for the destruction of that system.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics (The Law of Entropy) proves that evolution cannot happen. The Second Law stipulates (a poor attempt by scientists to describe The Curse of Genesis Chapter 3 and Revelation) that in all activities some of the energy becomes unavailable for further useful work. The universe is running down, not up.

17. The concept of a "Big Bang" producing the universe is absolutely illogical. Explosions do not produce ever increasing order and structure. Explosions produce disorder and chaos. Explosions break things down or destroy what was previously ordered.

18. There is no substantiated method in nature which would allow stars to be "born." The Gas Laws prove that the pressure of hot gases expanding outward from a center is far greater than the gravitational force drawing them towards a center. Stars could not evolve into existence.

19. The Law of Biogenesis (the Law of Life Beginnings) accurately states that life only comes from life, and that life only reproduces after its own kind. Life cannot spontaneously generate and life forms do not change from one kind into another kind.

20. The input of undirected energy accomplishes nothing. The input of undirected energy will destroy a system, not build it up. Only the input from a greater intelligence will cause a beneficial increase in order and/or complexity.

21. Not only must there be the input from a greater intelligence in order to produce an increase in complexity and/or intelligence, that intelligence must have a preconceived plan of action. No master craftsman would start to build without first having a plan, a blueprint.

22. In order for evolution to be true atoms must form useful molecules such as enzymes, amino acids and proteins by random chance. It is mathematically impossible for these molecules, much less the far larger DNA molecule, to form by random action in nature. It cannot happen!

23. Natural selection and survival of the fittest are supposed to be the driving forces of progressive upward evolution. There are no selective benefits for a supposed transitional form. There would be no advantage for a creature to have a half-evolved eye or a half-evolved wing. Indeed, the existence of such structures would be detrimental and serve only to eliminate, not perpetuate, such disfigured organisms from a given population.

24. The presumed intermediates required by evolution do not exist. The missing links are missing because they are missing. Reptilian scales do not/cannot become feathers. These structures originate from different cells within the skin tissue. Reptilian lungs do not/cannot change to become avian (bird) lungs. Air flows in and out of reptilian lungs just as in humans. Bird lungs have a flow through design.

25. Living organisms are incredibly complex and have specific design features. In order to make this point please consider the following partial list: woodpecker tongue, Bombardier Beetle chemistry, insect metamorphosis, Giraffe heart and arterial system, Gecko feet and human eyes (or human brains for that matter).

26. Single-celled organisms such as bacteria, amoeba and algae have the same degree of complexity within them that multiple-celled organisms have within them. Single-celled organisms have a skeleton, respiratory system, digestion and elimination systems, circulatory system, reproductive system, command and communication system.

27. Life forms are irreducibly complex. To code for RNA production within a cell you must already have whole and complete DNA. To make DNA you must already have whole and complete RNA. In addition, it requires about 70 proteins to fabricate a DNA molecule, but you must have whole and complete DNA to fabricate those proteins.

28. When we see design we know that there is/was a designer. The human mind intrinsically knows the difference between randomness and design. When we see a plastic hair comb, one of the simplest structures ever designed and consisting of only one part, we know that it was designed and made through intelligent effort. A plastic hair comb does not come into existence by random chance.

If we see three stones sitting on the bottom of a clear stream we know that they got there by the random action of the water current. If we see the same three stones piled up one on top of the other sitting on the bank of that stream we know that an outside intelligence placed them there.

We see design throughout nature. For good health blood must clot when it gets outside the body, but must not clot inside the body. In addition, it must stop clotting and not continue to clot once exposed to the outside. The molecular motors which turn the cilia of cells look exactly like little electric motors complete with bearings, shaft and housing. Our bodies must make decisions to accept or reject foreign substances or our immunological system does not work. Our bodies must also manufacture effective countermeasures without killing us at the same time.

29. Charles Darwin stated that the existence of vestigial and retrogressive organs and structures in the human body were essential proofs of evolution. It has now been determined that there are NO vestigial or retrogressive organs or structures in a human body!

30. Evolutionary theories remain incapable of explaining the existence of sex, symbiosis or altruism.

I reiterate that the solution to evolution is education! If we teach the true facts of science and teach our people to think critically they will never believe the Just So Stories of the evolutionists.

Besides, what is so dangerous about the facts that support creation?

A belief in creation destroys the works of the Devil!

That is what is so important about it and why evolutionists cling to their faith position concerning it. Evolution is a religion of conveniences. The acceptance of evolution is the only way in which people may mentally justify that there is no God. The acceptance of evolution is the only way in which they may mentally justify that they may lead a sinless life with Jesus Christ. The Bible declares that this is manifest delusion.

Teacher SAGE #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

- I am dying and have a SECRET, and a BIG ONE --ebola- and ET--

Hello,

I am currently dying and could be dead any moment so I must act fast.

My name is Jloan and I am from a different star system you know as Orion. Of course we call it something different. It has taken 233 earth years to learn to speak English as we as a species do not have vocal cords as you know them. However we do use vibratory mechanisms to communicate.

I am dying of age as we never live past 324 years and I am now facing that time and can feel the cold chill mixed with euphoria.

We have been on this planet for most of human history. When you took your first steps up right we were the bright star above your ancestors that encouraged them to rise and you did.

You have evolved but sadly you have failed to evolve past your primal instincts of eat, mate and murder. The planetary council in my home system has deemed you unfit to manage this planet.

Thus actions have been taken by your government under our guidance to release a pestilence designed to kill humans and related primates.

I have known and loved so many of you and sadly even more have broken our collective hearts with repeated violence and vitriol.

You are destined to destroy yourself but we are NOT wiling to allow you to destroy this beautiful planet with you.

I am sorry Humanity but you have Failed and been found unworthy.

Your population will be decimated by the pestilence in 9 months after which no earth bound sentient beings will be found on this planet thus bring back equilibrium.

As I die on this planet, to awaken in the nether I leave your planet saddened that the great hope "humanity" failed so badly.

May your passing be quickly and your light extinguished with little pain.

I think I feel a tear even though we do not use eyes as you do.

By the way, you ask yourself why are you not aware of US. Well you are if you think about it. We are everywhere we are legion.

Good bye Earth and Humanity........Vi Loa Huig Byapo Opld

66754

978452

12225
5679

886
3322

234
0074

Cancel #psycho #sexist pro-rape.com

from-pig-farmer-to-serial-killer-robert-pickton-cp-file.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pickton

This hero burdened himself with cleaning the Vancouver streets of whores of both the professional and amateur kind and ultimately helped rid the world of 6-49 harlots. Not only did he help the whores end their empty lives but he also put their corpses to good use by using it as fertilizer and feeding it to pigs. Pickton gaves the foids dignity through death.

For more than a decade he did his honorable work without thanks.

He's not dead, but he was punished by corrupt society that protects this degeneracy. Around the time when society was to victimize him, he said, "I made my own grave by being sloppy." I can't blame him: had society not been so sloppy already, he wouldn't have overloaded himself.

The tragic irony is that Pickton had to do the job thanklessly because when talked about it to an undercover cop, he was eventually caught. Had he only been more modest, but that would be a bit too much to ask, and only a truly enlightened saint could be so depersonalized from their altruism.

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

Entropy is always increasing. A fully disordered society is illustrated by wild animals and primitive peoples such as the Tasmanian aboriginals, where all other creatures except for close kin are enemies, obstacles or sources of raw materials – Hobbes state of war. So if you look back in history, you can always see entropic processes, bringing us back towards that condition.

So, how come ordered societies exist, how come surviving and prosperous societies are generally at least somewhat orderly?

You cannot make something clean without making something else dirty, but you can make any amount of stuff dirty without making anything clean. Order for the ingroup always comes at the expense of someone else: Thus, for example, chastity and monogamy requires men hitting badly behaved women with a stick. (Dalrock banned me for pointing this out.) Thus, for example, in Africa we saw societies that herded cattle and planted crops had to enslave, or kill and eat, vagrants that were apt to hunt other people’s cattle and gather from other people’s gardens. The shift from hunting and gathering to herding and gardening involved extended cooperation – and a fair bit of brutality to hunters and gatherers.

As birds are born to fly, humans are born to cooperate. That is our key capability. Our telos is various forms of cooperation, as the heart’s telos is to circulate blood. The whites of our eyes are white, so that other people can see what we are looking at. We are vulnerable to choking, because our throat is optimized towards making a wider variety of distinct sounds than other animals. We have a more muscles in our face than other animals, so that we can unfalsifiably communicate our emotional state, just as every feature of a bird’s anatomy is optimized for low weight and high metabolic output. This cooperation manifested as tribes cooperating to kill other tribes and capture their women. Order consists of extended cooperation. Because entropy naturally tends to increase, because there are a near infinity of ways for society to be disordered, but only a small number of ways for it to be ordered, maintaining order requires a fair bit of ruthlessness towards disorderly people and towards outgroups whose cooperation is unlikely. Gays undermine male solidarity. David’s mighty men could cohere because David could love Jonathan. David could love Jonathan because gays were put to death. Peoples who have gay parades do not win wars.

The ten commandments consist of four commandments concerning man’s relationship to God, five commandments that had the effect of ensuring that congregation of the Lord operated on a cooperate cooperate basis, and the final commandment, the tenth commandment, prohibited coming up with clever rationales for undermining, subverting, and re-interpreting those five.

The four commandments that facilitate cooperation are:
Exodus 20:

Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
Thou shalt not kill.
Thou shalt not commit adultery.
Thou shalt not steal.
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

The rule on honoring thy parents and committing adultery secured ownership of family, thus cooperation within the family. The rules against killing, stealing, and false witness enabled economic cooperation on the basis of property rights and the market economy.

And the final commandment:

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

prohibits people from concocting ingenious theories as to why someone else’s property or wife is rightfully their own – forbids the entire ideology and program of Social Justice.

Compliance to the four commandments concerning God made fellow members of the congregation readily identifiable, and by complying with these four commandments, for which compliance was as visible as possible, one gave other members of the congregation reason to believe one would comply with the other five commandments, for which compliance was less visible, and thus reason to believe that cooperation with people who complied with the first four would be reciprocated and rewarded by cooperation, resulting in cooperate/cooperate equilibrium.

Social Justice Warriors have turned the tenth commandment on its head, making envy and covetousness a sacrament. This explains their chronic failure to cooperate, explains why rallies to save the earth leave a snail trail of trash behind them. Social Justice declares that what people have is “privilege” and should be taken away from them. Which creates a society in which people have no reason to have wealth or family.

A religion is a synthetic tribe. If the priesthood has power and status, and also has open entry into the priesthood, one gets holiness spirals – as for example priestly celibacy. Cooperate cooperate equilibrium, giving every man his due, makes all good members of the religion equal in holiness though unequal in property and power, thus a holiness spiral is going to redefine holiness away from forms that promote cooperation. The tribal religion has to reward exceptional and unusual holiness with honor, but not power and wealth. Send saints to live in a hermitage with spartan living conditions on a remote island as far from the capital as possible, where they can demonstrate superior holiness without subverting and undermining social order. On the one hand, to encourage good behavior, the society must honor supererogatory holiness. On the other hand preaching superogatory holiness always threatens to redefine holiness in ways that undermine order, making holiness a force of disorder instead of order.

...

Starbucks hates its customers, and LucasFilm hates its customers, which subverts cooperation on the basis of exchange. While practicing supererogation should be honored, preaching it needs to be forcefully suppressed. People who preach supererogation should not be martyred, which might increase their status, but rather treated like a stray dog that chases chickens – punished in ways that lower their status.

...

If the Sovereign is forced to punish someone who preaches supererogatory holiness in a way that might potentially increase their status (and Charles the second was forced to burn one conspicuously and irritatingly holy nonconformist woman at the stake) the Sovereign should lock the body in a mortuary for three days, and on the third day ironically check the body to see if they have risen from the dead. But it is as dangerous to martyr those who preach supererogatory holiness, as it is to tolerate them. The Sovereign must always strike at primarily at their status, as Russia dealt with Pussy Riot and European University.

While entropy always increases, it is always possible to locally reduce entropy, usually at the expense of someone else less effective and successful at extended cooperation (as, for example, women, pussy riot, gays, or hunter gatherer outgroups).

The highest and best example of this is western civilization, which is anglo civilization, which is the restoration of Charles the Second. The restoration gave us science, technology, corporate capitalism, industrialization, and world empire, which represent the highest level of extended cooperation ever achieved.

The restoration cured the disorderly tendencies of the protestant holiness spiral by putting priests under bishops, and bishops under the King. Which was the imposition of order, at the expense of “non conformists” – whose very name implies their disorderly tendencies. “Non conformists” were priests, professors, judges, and suchlike who were disinclined to accept this hierarchy, on the grounds that the King at the top was conspicuously lacking in holiness. We need to do something similar with our university system, as well as radically reducing its size and the amount of time it sucks out of people’s lives – we need to do Charles the Second’s Bishops, and Henry the Eighth’s dissolution of the monasteries.

Universities have always had as their primary job inculcating people in the official religion, and giving people cultural and scientific knowledge has always been merely their secondary job. Lately, their secondary job has largely been abandoned. It used to be that giving people job skills was entirely irrelevant, since this was done by enforceable apprenticeship.

We shall restore the enforceable apprenticeship system and divest universities of the task of giving people job skills, in the process divesting them of the power to accredit people to jobs. We shall give considerably higher, but still secondary, priority to the task of giving people cultural and scientific knowledge, and change the official religion to make it saner, by erasing all doctrines that are potentially falsifiable by the realities of this world. Members of the elite will still be required to adhere to the official religion, as they are now, but the task of checking adherence will not be outsourced to the universities. Instead, people in state jobs and quasi statal jobs will be required to recite a catechism and take an oath.

Contrary to the myth about the plymouth rock puritans, that early puritans supposedly filled the North American continent, where we have genealogies, puritans are descended from those who left restoration England to establish their own dissident theocracy, not from the pre english civil war wave of migrants fleeing Charles the first, but from the post civil war wave of “noncomformist” migrants fleeing the restoration, fleeing Charles the Second and subsequent Kings. The first wave, the pre civil war wave, left very few direct descendants.

Restoration England was successful at elite eugenic reproduction, because women were kept under control, and cured the disorderly propensities of the protestant reformation by keeping “non conformists” under control, thereby enabling the extended cooperation that made science and industry possible. Immediately after the restoration, we see Ayn Rand’s heroic archetype appear, the scientist engineer CEO, mobilizing other people’s capital and other people’s labor to advance technology and make that technology widely available. Often these were people who before the restoration had competed for superior holiness, (analogous to Musk’s subsidized and money burning tesla, solar panels, and solar batteries), but after the restoration competed for creating technology to produce value (analogous to Musk’s reusable booster rocket.) This form of order was made possible at the expense of “non conformists”, such as the excessively holy woman that Charles the Second burned at the stake.

In order for society to have cooperate/cooperate equilibrium, the science, industry, and technology that we see promoted by the corporate form, in order to promote cooperation with cooperators, the sovereign must promote defection on defectors. One such defector being a holy woman conspicuously holier than Charles the Second. Charles the second successfully redirected status competition from unproductive channels into productive channels, as for example members of the Royal Society gaining status by discovering truth and speaking truth, while previously puritans had gained power and status by having a Christianity that was purer than the other man’s Christianity. You will notice that Putin dealt with Pussy Riot’s weaponized supererogatory holiness preaching in a way that deliberately maximized disorder – maximized outgroup disorder in order to sustain ingroup order. That is the way to do it.

The restoration created a society that had the greatest cooperate/cooperate equilibrium ever, where people were able to engage in positive sum cooperation, which was made possible by severely negative sum uncooperation – you cannot get more negative sum than burning an excessively holy woman at the stake. If Charles the Second had not burned a holy woman at the stake for excessive, conspicuous, and obnoxiously superior holiness, he would have had the William Wilberforce problem.

Humans are inherently tribal. We have ethnicities and religions, all of which are in substantial part the same phenomenon. A millet is a smaller tribe (religion) within the empire that the empire recognizes and grants some limited self rule and autonomy.

Two tribes cannot co-exist in overlapping territory, except they create little zones for themselves, for example the black table in school cafe. One tribe will always rule, and another will always be ruled. Segregation and Jim Crow was an effort to give blacks autonomy and self rule, make them into a millet, conditional on the black rulers assimilating to white middle class values and behavior. Integration proved to be black dominion. When the blacks were allowed to the front of the bus, they inevitably wound up forcing white people off the buses.

This tribalism is the problem with libertarianism – if you allow liberty, people will use it to synthesize smaller ingroups within the larger group in order to dominate the detribalized majority. William Wilberforce and his “elect” destroyed what the restoration had accomplished, undermining the small scale cooperation between men and women to have children, and the cooperation between elites and individual members of the elite to maintain an empire that kept large scale economic cooperation over the oceans. His successors transliterated the religion of the elect from the next world to this world, creating modern progressivism. Since the transliterated tenets, such as equality, are transparently false to this world, this required them to reject truth telling and truth speaking, resulting in peer review and the replication crisis that has destroyed science.

The earthly telos of holiness is to promote the broadest possible cooperate/cooperate equilibrium. Holiness competition results in people finding grounds to declare other people unholy, thus Starbucks and LucasFilms declare their customers unholy, thus holiness competition destroys the earthly telos of holiness. Therefore we cannot allow excessively holy people to gain power in the state religion. Instead, need to send Social Justice Warriors away from the universities off to a hermitage in a remote island and honor their superior holiness from a safe distance. If someone wants to demonstrate superior holiness, it should be costly for himself, rather profitable for himself, and costly for everyone around him. Superior holiness and performing superogatory acts has to be made unprofitable.

Paul M. Dohse #wingnut paulspassingthoughts.com

As a lifelong Republican and a Berry Goldwater conservative when I was nine years old, I have always been politically frustrated. I grew up watching the Vietnam fiasco unfold on the evening news and knew it was a humanitarian travesty that utterly rejected life value. No American politician has sought forgiveness for throwing away 50,000 American lives for a war with no clear objective except lame attempts to reason with Communists. Even at my young age, I knew Communism couldn’t be reasoned with.

I watched Jimmy Carter get elected. I couldn’t believe it. I remember a week before an election a good friend sensing my angst put his hand on my shoulder and said, “Paul, Paul, Paul, relax, the American people may be a little stupid, but they aren’t stupid enough to elect Bill Clinton.” I didn’t believe him one bit; I knew better. Then came Barak Obama; twice. I am still amazed at how the framers of the American Constitution had it all figured out; despite Obama’s overt attempt to destroy our Republic, we were spared due to the system the framers put in place.

Now we have Donald Trump, and an election coming in about ten months, but this time, my gut tells me this will be different. Would the American people, regardless of the economic statistics etc., elect an Elizabeth Warren over Donald Trump? In the past, before Trump, I wouldn’t hesitate to say, “Absolutely, yes.” Not this time, again, my gut tells me this will be different, but why?

Looking back, if you think about it, at least in my lifetime, no Democrat has beat a Republican in a landslide. Whenever a Democrat wins, it is either by a slim or moderate victory. This, along with what Trump has exposed, has me pondering.

Trump, regardless of whether or not you would like to have a beer with him, knew something a lot of Americans knew deep down but didn’t want to admit: nether party has been representing the American people for a long time. As an international business person, he knew politicians, for the most part, are elitists who believe they are entitled to unlimited wealth coming from the labor of the little people. When he saw crony capitalism on the precipice of destroying America he intervened.

Different healthcare systems for politicians and the little people; a two-tier justice system; and guns for protecting politicians, but not for the little people. The list goes on and on. And both parties are guilty and have been guilty for a long time; the Republicans are only a little less guilty where complicit.

Two things, primarily, have made the Trump phenomenon possible: the information age and Trump’s genius. The information age has made it possible for Trump to take his message directly to the American people. Elitism’s control of information has been totally decimated. Trump is also smart enough to play politics by a totally different set of rules.

In considering all of this, I am not so sure Americans are totally stupid, but rather stayed home at election time because they sensed no real difference between Republicans and Democrats. In other words, they lost hope in the American political system. Trump, though genius, has a funny way of stating things: he said the political system is rigged; that means Republicans and Democrats have had the same basic status qua agenda for a long time, but the people understood what he was saying. At his inaugural speech, with the brunt of all American political representation sitting behind him, Trump accused all of forgetting the American people in exchange for their own interests and promised to be different. And he kept those promises.

American politicians don’t keep promises. That’s why, until now, election turnout was people wanting free stuff being led by idealists who have never worked for anything in their lives on one side, and eternal optimists on the other, and inactive political pessimism in-between.

Trump is the political savior that no one thought would ever come. The politically disenfranchised initially popped corn and watched the Republican debates purely for entertainment. At least we could watch the politicians get a few pies in their faces for all the misery they have caused us. At least we had someone we could vote for to flip the other politicians the bird. Trump was catharsis—little more. No one really thought a political messiah would come.

Then, as we all know, strange things started happening and hope temtped us. Taking back the Republican party rather then running as a third party candidate was part of Trump’s strategy. Everything was against him, yet, he has prevailed. Indeed, he is a strange character, but it is a ridiculous notion to think any normal person could pull this off.

So, are Americans basically stupid, or basically smart enough to know when voting is a waste of time? In the process of catharsis, was political hope accidently discovered? Are we dumbfounded to discover the process actually still works if we have someone crazy enough to make it work?

This time around, my gut tells me it’s the latter. Trump has exposed the whole rotten bastardizing of the intended system. I believe a vast number of people who previously lost hope and interest in the system are energized. Hope in the American political system has returned.

They were never stupid, but rather smart enough to know that voting was a waste of time. I think that is what Trump has taught me; at least I hope so.

Gaia Staff #crackpot #magick #ufo gaia.com

INTERDIMENSIONAL BIGFOOT THEORIES

For hundreds of years, people worldwide have reported encounters with monsters, fairies, demons, and cryptids. To this day those experiences persist, while many of these same entities have also been encountered through the use of psychedelics.

Now, it would be easy to say these are simply archetypal figures; beings our collective consciousness conjures in our minds with anthropomorphic features based on fears or subliminal functions of our psyche. Or we could entertain the ostensibly bizarre possibility that these are entities from another dimension operating on higher realms of existence.

Keel referred to these entities as ultra-terrestrials; beings capable of crossing dimensions at will, often acting as “cosmic pranksters.” Indeed, Daniel Pinchbeck says he has experienced prankster entities cross from a psychedelic realm into the real world after encountering them during, and in the subsequent weeks following a psychedelic journey.

When it comes to Bigfoot, Sasquatch, the Yeti, or whatever you want to call them, there is often a playfulness and/or spookiness described in their actions. Tree knocking or eerie screams alert us to their presence until we get close enough where they might offer a glimpse, before vanishing seemingly into thin air.

Their appearance could be considered another form of prank, embodying a primitive, ape-like creature that exudes a noxious odor. Yet, they’re able to evade contact with us despite thousands of reported sightings over hundreds of years. Is Sasquatch cosmically trolling us?

IncelKing #fundie incels.co

How can any incel hate Elliot Rodger, who was responsible for bringing inceldom to the spotlight.

Without ER, inceldom would still be as much of a barely known concept as it was before he committed the attack. He was the one who first brought attention to our plight and problems by being vocal and explicitly detailing his social isolation and complete lack of success with women as being the main motivations for going ER, as evidenced in his youtube videos and 137 page manifesto. It was the first mass-murder by a self-proclaimed virgin and incel, so media and news channels were definitely quick to broadcast this story publicly in the state headlines. As soon as whole state knew about this attack, it spread to other states in the country.

Later it spread to other countries in the world. Information has no borders because these greedy news corporations and media outlets only care about money from selling this information to news corps/media in other countries, irregardless of currencies because they can be easily converted using the ER- "Exchange Rate", a tool created by the jews to rank each currency by assigning it a value in comparison to other countries currencies, creating a pyramid-like hierarchical structure where the stronger a country's currency, the more power they have in the global market of resources.

Thanks to the internet, international trade of information has become a much faster, simpler and efficient process. Elliot Rodger used the internet in order to broadcast himself as an incel and give voice to the incel movement. If he had not done this, the same news channels and media would instead be broadcasting propaganda about female superiority and ignoring the treatment of of low value men in the west, further distancing society from the truth. Instead, the world became more aware of inceldom which was no longer a concept but a reality, one which the west still silences discussion of (we are lucky to have this forum tbh). Fuck Internet censorship.

This forum which acts as a centre of learning and enlightenment through the teaching of the blackpill in its numerous forms, wouldnt even exist if it wasnt for ER because we wouldn't be able to find out that there are other people in the world who share the same experiences as us if the news corps didnt spread ER story and open the curtains to reveal a glimpse of inceldom to the crowd. If this forum was created only a couple of years later than it was created, an extra 1 million males would be dead from suicide around the world including many people here, who are only still alive today because of this site which is their main/only cope, without which they would chosen the rope.

You cannot hate prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and claim to be a Muslim. You cannot hate Jesus and claim to be a Christian. You cannot hate Moses and claim to be a Jew. And you can't hate Elliot Rodger and claim to be an incel. Elliot Rodger is the saint of the Incel brotherhood and his manifesto is our bible. To hate him and claim to be one of us (Incels) is an act of disbelief and should be punished seriously. Yes he took innocent lives but nothing comes without sacrifice. Elliot envisioned a bettER world in which incels would be treated like actual human beings and not socially ostracized, bullied, alienated and disconnected. He believed in something and sacrificed EVERYTHING.

While it should be obvious, i dont condone taking out your frustrations by harming innocent people no matter the circumstances. Elliot Rodger shouldnt be loved for what he did, which was a terrible crime. Rather, he should be loved for the long-term impact he made in the world, as he saved many more lives than he took by preventing thousands of potential incel/low-tier men suicides. He took a few lives and ultimately his own because he believed it was a price to pay for the greatER good.

Elliot Rodger is the true messenger of our ideology. His messages will influence the future beta uprising. He is viewed as a villain by the world. But in an evil world, the villain of the story is the true hERo.

irishsavant #conspiracy #racist irishsavant.blogspot.com

Is it possible for White gentiles to live harmoniously with a Jewish minority? I've come to the view that it's not. First let's get out of the way the standard acknowledgement that there are many good Jews in any community (I've known plenty) and there are even greater numbers who just want to live and let live. Nonetheless a significant Jewish presence in any country seems to have, and has had throughout the centuries, a negative impact on the host communities. In some cases, like that of Russia, this impact has been catastrophic. The maladies that affect Western countries today have been heavily, in some cases overwhelmingly, driven by Jewish Power. I refer, and this is far from an exhaustive list, to mass Third World immigration, debasement of art and literature, transforming courts into enforcers of anti-White 'hate' legislation and every form of sexual degeneracy, turning universities into indoctrination centres, redirecting economies from productive self-sufficiency to speculative finance, destroying the foundations and supports of the traditional family.

That's a fairly serious rap sheet. But it's fair to say that we ourselves allowed them do this through inattentiveness, inaction and a misguided altruism. For the sake of argument let's posit that Whites miraculously became Jew-aware and seized back control of our countries. Could we maintain such control? I don't think so. Because over time Jews will gradually recapture The Narrative. Bit by bit they'll transform into the helpless victims of yore, Whites will be reduced to warring ethno-religious camps, laws masquerading as universal principles of justice (think 'hate' crimes) will be implemented to further their agenda, indebtedness will grow, societal cohesion will atrophy. Think how Jews have taken over any - make that every - institution in America. Using the tried and trusted cuckoo-in-the-nest strategy ('greetings fellow white people') they've edged out the goyim and replace them with their own. It's gradual, surreptitious and symbiotic in that each infiltrated component - media, law, politics and finance - will work together to achieve the broader objective.

Incidentally, this is not necessarily by way of a formal plan or structure. It's more of a shared instinct defending shared interests in a spirit of bitterness. If they lose ground in any arena they'll come back. Again and again. They were pushing for immigration "reform" in America for fifty years before they got the 1965 Immigration Act passed. And now Holocaustrianity gives them unprecedented latitude.

To cut to the chase I don't think an accommodation possible. Why? A number of reasons. We must consider the Kevin MacDonald theory that they're biologically programmed to act as they do. Which in itself renders an agreed solution impossible. Then as some wise man once said “Jews do not have a history, they have a martyrology”. Jews have a kind of meta-history of martyrdom and persecution that relieves them of any responsibility for their historical travails. This and the Talmud (which in places reads like a psychopath's charter) combine to reinforce in-group support and out-group antipathy. Such ethnocentric people are prone to not seeing how their own ethnocentrism blinds them to rational discussion of anything related to their ethnic interests. Then there's the insatiability. They can never have enough as we've seen in Wall Street and the Middle East. And there's no gratitude, every concession is quickly followed by further demands. Ad infinitum. They seem to have no sense, or so it seems to me, of the blatant double standards under which they operate.

Hard to build a lasting accommodation with such people. Which means......what?

ShadowTheEdgehog #sexist #crackpot incels.co

RE: [RageFuel] Empathy is a trait of sufferers

Foids, chads and normoids will never understand compassion because they never faced struggle. Chads can say fuck you to anyone and not feel bad in the slightest, but if that chad was always told to fuck off as a child, he wouldn't do it because he know how much it hurts. Suffering = wisdom and understanding tbh

This is why normoids are so fucking evil and selfish.

Yes, they have no humility. That's also why they are so sensitive to being insulted.
Tbh, getting my ass kicked online over the years has actually turned me into a better Person.
That's why self-deprecating Humor doesn't work with normies because they are all narcissists to a Degree.
They simply can't take attacks of their own ego.

Think About it, Society has created an entire sub-Group of self-deprecating People to be Entertainers and we just call them Comedians. That's how incapable the normalfaggot is of self-criticism.

It is another reason why I can't stand non- incel places
Normoids are the most self- centered piece of shit narcissists I've ever seen
It is always about them one way or another, never about anyone else

Yes, they just ping-pong stuff on you, its never really About you as a Person. Even when they praise you, they expect something in return. If a normie praises you and you don't react, they get pissed.
That's why I stopped trusting People early in my Teens, it is just pointless. There is no true altruism with them, they are Always selfish.
They cum in your face and then they expect you to smile jfl

To_Live_is to_Serve #sexist incels.co

[LifeFuel] Imagine if the gender roles were reversed.

You could get a one-way open relationship with your looksmatch while also using tinder to get Prime top percentage Stacies. Your fellow men will be lazy and thousand cunt stare making you a real catch. You will not have to work; you could just get a virgin betabuxx 7/10 engineer wife without sexual experience.

You could give thousands of cream pies and not worry about pregnancy as you have total control over paternity and abortion. You get easy well paid job as receptionist while your looksmatch get a depressing manual labour job. You could sell your dirty undies for money while staying completely anonymous and you could show your currently subhuman body on webcam to get endless compliments and money by women who want to admire your body. You would get softer sentences and it would be a crime to make you homeless. You would not get attacked violently by other men as they have a great solidarity and would burn 1000 women alive instead of having your needs go unmet which the government would support.

All modern media would cater to your hedonistic desires while you would be praised for having the spirituality you have. Genes would be filtered out by selection of females instead of female selection meaning that your mass reproduction could be justified as a part of evolution. You could have sex with virgin teens illegally and they would be grateful for you taking their virginities and creampieing them. You could help the incel normies ascend in this world and get praised as a moral paragon by both the privileged and the unprivileged. You would get endless personalised compliments by sending a mass message on your real tinder intead of just the catfish account.

Women would instinctively protect you with their lives and send you gifts, expecting nothing in reward and getting joyfully over a dicpic which they would brag about getting from you on the internet. No face would be too foul and no penis too small for you to live a life of leisure and privilege and anyone who says otherwise would get deplatformed immediately. Women would still cook food and take care of children as betabuxxers do now. You would decide when sex is had in the relationship and media would uphold male pastimes like warfare, sport and gaming while condemning fraudulent make-up. Women who get caught frauding men get burned alive by jealous women as soon as you give the hint.

You wouldn't need to have a personality or an inner monologue to get by but having one would grant you great opportunities. You could wear shorts in public and get compliments IRL daily while being able to have sex with any woman who compliments you. You would be the archetype of an admirable moral person. Parties with high energy would be held to attract and amuse people like you and get you to open up and have sex like for young females. All men would have a similar smv; some difference in attraction would exist but fetishes even it all out. All female students and teachers would want you and especially you as you don't appear to be damaged by the cunt coaster. It would be paradise-like.

The true paradise comes from within but is a poor comfort when you are poor, wet and unwanted.

kerasea #fundie youtube.com

To the so called atheist's out there, can one person give me an explanation as to how it all began ? At what point did baboons transition into humans and how did this happen? Man can only come from man. A horse can only come from another horse not a chicken. Big bang, talk about a fairy tale. There had to have been a creator

ngrh8r #racist vnnforum.com

image Attention niggers: Why do you stink?

What is that musky, fecal aroma that follows you around? I have watched you liberally douse yourselves with strange nigger-specific "hygiene" products. Are these the source of your awful reek, or merely a pointless attemp to cover it up? Your females smell the worst. I can only imagine the festering, decaying monkey-spunk that surely fills the nether regions of your unbelievably promiscuous women. I feel terribly sorry for the few human players left in the NBA. The stench of a locker room full of sweaty niggers is surely enough to turn enough the most resilient stomach. image

Alia_Harkonnen #fundie reddit.com

Fuck You

I can’t connect to anyone. I don’t know what to say to people even if I want to say something. I wish for most people to just disappear on the spot. We live in different realms. They say their stuff and I can’t even argue because I still can’t fully wrap my head around that they believe it. That all these people live in the world that allows them to think and talk that way. And feeling so right while doing it. So sane and balanced, well intended. So sure in their own importance and abilities even when they act modest and insecure, it shines through. In how they give advice, in how they assume the value of their intent, in how they think people should hear their opinions and conclusions because they have something to offer. In the fact that they dare to even search for meaning in things. In their self love, or pursuit for self love. In their selfies. In their jokes. I hate them. I hate them because they don’t even have the capacity to understand why I hate them. I can try to explain how disgusting they are but it won’t resonate when all those parts are what they are most proud off. So the problem is me, except I know i see things clearly. I know why I hate what I hate, and I stand by my hatred. I like my hatred. I have almost no real personality, I have no real tools to cope much with life, but I am glad I still feel disgust and hatred. If I didn’t, I would be someone truly horrible.

“Hate eats you up inside.” No, it doesn’t. It builds me up. At least it gives me momentary focus. Who cares whom I hate anyway. I’m generous with it. I don’t even interact with people though, how much do you need to be liked to be bothered by misogyny or misanthropy of someone like me?

Does it really need to be explained that there are levels from which we can observe things. On some level I hate you all. On some level you just annoy me. On some level I really don’t care. There are people I don’t hate, who say things I don’t find to be dumb. But I still can’t connect. I can’t have conversations, I can’t have or meet up to expectations. I hate the people I like as well then, on some level, cause they make me feel the worst. And I’m not even really close to anyone, that’s my act of altruism from a very profound level where I’m practically a hero. Every time I choose to stay away, I am a hero. Every time I tell you to go fuck yourself, I am a hero. Cause I let you go and I know exactly what you think about me, and it’s so easy for you to reach your conclusions and let it go. I am doing an act of kindness. When I tell you to go choke on a dick, I am giving you an easy out. And I like it. I like to say these things to people I don’t like. But it’s nothing. What makes you worthy of such dislike is how easily you then take this hatred trivially, but it’s not trivial. It’s not personal, for that you would have to be a person. It’s depressing, it’s disgusting, it’s completely overwhelming how sick you make me feel.

I’m not speaking from a moral high ground although my hatred is moral. I’m not speaking as a person, I’s much bigger than that. I don’t speak from self love, cause I could never begin to even think about taking that idiotic concept seriously, let alone see it as something to work on. How do you say such stupid words and don’t stop and get filled with disgust. Or at least find it funny. Something, anything but what you’re doing and thinking now.

No, I don’t love myself. If I hate myself, that’s also on some level. On some level I have very bad anxiety, I can’t speak, I can’t think and I can’t take it. I hate this situation. But it doesn’t matter. Contradictions are only an issue to idiots. There’s no hypocrisy. I don’t have to be anyone at all to hate you. Nothing needs to be deserved.

My hatred won’t harm you, it helps you. You will interpret in such way where it will fit right in with your beliefs and I am the example of what you don’t want to be like at all. And that’s how it will always be, you’ll talk on and on loving your voice, and I’ll say my shit and no one will hear anyone, cause if by any chance we do hear then we can just hate. If you could see how i see you, you would hate me too.

I know why I talk here. I just come here trying to find my thoughts and put them together so they leave my head. I don’t do it to exist or to tell others who I am. I don’t have solutions. That’s all it is, stupid random thoughts. But I have no doubt that my hatred is my morality. It is not wrong, and it is not bad, not for me or for anyone else.

Love is different, love is for individuals.

But I know I can’t connect with anyone. There is no solution, and the problem isn’t complex. It’s lack of ability. It’s so frustrating. You can’t imagine the frustration of it. When you want something so much but it doesn’t exist in others, and it doesn’t exist in you. You spent years working on some solution personified, or epiphany, and you spend years knowing there is none, but you still want to say to someone they are right, or that you agree, or that something they said reflected what you were thinking and it meant something to you. It is not something you experience often, and even though it won’t change anything, you think you can get something through that recognition, that something can be added onto you. But when you try to say it, it’s already dead. You can’t do anything with it, you can’t make it important without coping and turning things into your own little myths and legends. And then it’s disgusting. Before you know it it’s over.

But that’s not your life. You’re not alone, you all share the whole world where almost everything in it has the same meaning and you all relate. You’re so safe. Sometimes you find some things you can’t relate and you feel lonely until you eventually find someone you can relate even that to. You feel lonely so easily but you’re never really lonely. We are really lonely. We can’t relate anything, not even with each other. Our minds are empty. We don’t connect. We live in completely different worlds but while you’re all together in yours we are nowhere. It’s not a world, it’s just some empty place with nothing in it and we watch you. Your world is shit. Jealousy only goes so deep, it’s a distraction. Your world is a nightmare to watch but you are relatively content in it, and you’re not lonely in it. You ruin everything I could care about. I don’t want to be like you, and i don’t want to be where you are. And I don’t want to be where I am. But these two things are completely different and comparison is dumb.

I can’t do anything. I’m also just stuck. I can only hate everything to keep sane. When I say i wish everything was different, I don’t mean self improve, i don’t mean being like someone else, I don’t mean utopia, I mean everything.

HueHueBr #psycho incels.co

[Blackpill] Altruistic incel = bluepilled

Altruism and concern for others may sound good for chads and stacies. anything sounds good for chads and stacies. For incels and even normies, altruism is just a deadly poison.

After I finally realized that everyone wants me dead for the simple reason that it is genetic junk, and once I decided not to kill myself, I realized that altruism makes no sense to an incel.

Knowing that everyone around you, without exception, wants your death, your only concern should be to survive the attacks and somehow destroy your opponents by pitting each other or getting out of their control. any concern for the welfare of others should be ruled out, because their total focus must be solely on your survival.

So if you care about the welfare of others, or the future of the nation, or anything like that, you still don't understand that everyone wants your death only, and you will only be tolerated if absolutely necessary. If you still do not understand this, we have proof that you are bluepilled.

lendingheart #fundie rr-bb.com

[On a women's discussion thread about whether they would have married their husbands if they knew then what they know now ...]

beiing married to him [her husband]... and reading about Jesus shows me what a man should and shouldnt be.... Jesus is my dream man.

Incase of divorce or death, my next man has to be 100% like Jesus... but since that man dont exist.... i will never have a another man.... NO WAY..... but i will gladly be at the marriage supper of the Lamb !!!!

Jim #racist #wingnut #sexist blog.jim.com

[From "Deus Vult"]

Trump cannot get stuff done, because he is merely president, and the permanent government is full of people that hate him.

But it is not just the permanent government. His political appointees are in bed with his enemies, and are subverting his agenda. Two years after Hitler was elected, Hitler had a Nazi running ever boy scout troop and every trade union chapter. Trump cannot even get a Trumpist running border security.

The one area where Trump has been successful is putting his people in the judiciary. Trumpist judges, though still massively outnumbered, are coming in at every level. Trump has been effective in appointing judges, because he has a big bench he can draw upon, which bench knows who whom, which bench is self policing, which bench can be relied upon to carry out his program without him needing to be on their back. Personnel is policy, and the Federalist society has a supply.

Reflect on the Federalist society: They have their article of faith – original intent. And they have a network to identify their fellow faithful. Just as Constantine adopted Christianity that provided him with a cohesive group to staff his government, in a Roman Empire disintegrating from elite incohesion.

To govern, you need a synthetic tribe, which Hitler had, which Constantine adopted, and which Trump lacks, except for the federalist society which is narrowly focused on judicial process.

The Federalist article of faith (Original Intent) that provides unity and cohesion is also an effective antibody against enemy outgroups. It is something no leftist can admit is even thinkable – to them, just words with no meaning that they dare conceive of. So when leftist entryists attempt to infiltrate the Federalists, they use their shibboleths incorrectly, like a Marxist purporting to be channeling Adam Smith, and wind up babbling random nonsensical meaningless scripted formulaic NPC gibberish.

We, on the other hand, agree with the leftists, that original intent is not really going to fly, while we agree with the Federalists that judges exercising executive, legislative, budgetary authority is intolerable. One emperor is a stationary bandit. A thousand little emperors is mobile banditry and anarcho tyranny. We, however, propose a solution far more radical than that of the federalists – that the final court of appeal should be the Sovereign, should be Moses, the King, or the President, and he should be able to intervene in any case, and fire any judge. We also propose William the Conqueror’s “forms of action”, meaning that judges should be reduced to data entry clerks filling out forms that result in remote procedure calls to a system of central databases, similar to the system used by Australia’s border control force for dealing with “Illegal persons”. (Australian Border Force is Judge Dredd with more typing required than Judge Dredd had to do, but the same refreshing speed, efficiency, and absence of lawyers and priestly robes as with Judge Dredd.) William the Conqueror’s “Forms of action” kept judges in line for seven hundred years, and modern databases and remote procedure calls make William the Conqueror’s solution lightning fast, so that it can be applied by a cop on the beat, after the fashion of Judge Dredd and the Australian Border Force.

We have our mailing lists and forums, like the federalist society. What we don’t have is some articles of faith, a canon, a creed, a catechism. Constantine’s Christians had a creed. Trump’s federalist society has one. By getting agreement on certain principles, we can identify our fellow faithful, we can provide a tribe capable of governing. Our basic plan is that someone grabs power, needs a tribe to actually govern. Ideally, a warrior grabs power at gunpoint, swiftly discovers that guns do not suffice, realizes he needs a priesthood, looks around for a priesthood, finds us, as Constantine found Christendom, and Trump found the Federalist Society. When Trump appoints someone in charge of border security, he does not necessarily get someone who favors border security. When Trump appoints a Federalist Society judge, he reliably gets a Federalist, as Constantine reliably got a Christian, and Hitler reliably got a Nazi.

The political appointees that Trump appoints are frequently disloyal to Trump and hostile to his agenda. The Federalist Judges he appoints are loyal to federalism, thus reasonably loyal to Trump and supportive of his agenda. Indeed the left regularly complains that federalist judges are more supportive of Trump and his agenda than they are to federalism, which is not true, but has a substantial grain of truth in that federalist judges appointed on the basis of their federalism are more supportive of Trump and his agenda than are political appointees appointed on the basis of loyalty to Trump and his agenda. The Federalist society polices itself. Trump is not having much success policing Trump political appointees.

[...]

So: here are the articles of the Canon:

Throne
Altar
Freehold
Family
Property

Throne

Division of powers, divided sovereignty does not work, more rulers means mobile banditry and anarcho tyranny. A stationary bandit has better incentives than a mobile bandit.

Altar

You cannot separate state and church. The church will undermine the state and take state power for itself, or the state subvert the church, or both at once. Harvard is our high holy Cathedral. A holiness spiral ensues as the priestly classes, the professoriat, the judiciary, and the media, pursue power by each being holier than the other. Obviously we have a state religion a state religion that every day becomes crazier, more dogmatic, and more intrusive, and that state religion needs to be formalized and made official so that the high priest and grand inquisitor can stop holiness spirals.

[...]

Freehold

Freehold necessarily involves and requires rejection of the principle of equality before the law, and property rejection of equality of outcomes. Not all men were created equal, nor are women equal to men, nor is one group or category of men equal to another. Stereotypes are stereotypical, because the stereotype is usually true for most individual members of the group or category.

We have never had equality before the law, and are having it less every day. Cops have a special right to use violence, blacks have a special right to use violence and to not be insulted, similar to that of the traditional aristocracy, Hispanics and illegal immigrants in California have a special right to use violence and to not be insulted.

State building is coalition building to rule. We need a coalition of the smart, the cooperative, and the productive, ruling the stupid, the disruptive, and the destructive. The doctrine of equality means you cannot reward the elite with status? What! Of course the ruling elite is going to be rewarded with status, and that is exactly what is happening.

The ruling elite always gets rewarded, the ruling coalition always gets rewarded. Members of the ruling coalition always get a superior right to use violence, and a superior right to not be insulted. That is the way it is, and that is what we saw when white people were ethnically cleansed out of Detroit. The doctrine of equality before the law was always a lie intended to destroy the coalition of the smart, the cooperative, and the productive, to guilt the best people into surrender, so that they could be destroyed by a coalition of the worst.

Freehold means that we acknowledge that some state power is in fact private property, and the sovereign lets his loyal vassals enjoy their privilege, because if he tries to meddle, he will be overwhelmed by detail and complexity, so best to formalize that privilege and make it official. If we don’t have the aristocracy that so offended the founding fathers, we find ourselves with blacks exercising aristocratic privilege over whites. Equality before the law is an unworkable ideal, hypocritically betrayed in actual practice. Some people are going to be unjustly privileged. Let us try to make it the best people rather than the worst people, and try to make it the people that the state draws is wealth and coercive power from, rather than the people who sponge off the state.

Family

The immense biological and reproductive differences between men and women means that they can only cooperate for family formation on asymmetric, unequal terms. The wife has a duty to honor and obey, the husband to love and cherish. To ensure cooperation between men and women, the state, the family, society, and religion have to force men and women who sleep together to stick together, to force them to perform their marital duties, to force the man to cherish and the woman to obey, otherwise you get defect/defect, and reproduction and family become difficult for both men and woman.

For hypergamy to be eugenic rather than dysgenic, taxpayers and warriors need to have a special right to use violence and to not be insulted. For marriage to work, pimps, sluts, and whores need to have a substantially less protection against violence, insult, and rape. For marriage to be incentive compatible for women it has to be simply legal for a respectable man to chain a slut up in his basement, and if she does not want to risk that outcome, she needs to sign up in a nunnery or submit to husband. A right to protection should require chastity and/or submission to the authority of a husband or father. Sluts shall have legal authority equal to chaste women? What! This inevitably results in sluts being given legal status higher than that of chaste woman, and that is exactly what is happening. Wives, like whites, are very much second class low status citizens. We have an aristocracy, and black whores are at the top.

Women always wind up heading off the protection of the most alpha male around. If that is the protection of uncle Sam, you get what we have got.

You will notice that the doctrine that all women shall be equal required and led to the doctrine that all women are naturally chaste, enshrined in our current law on rape and sexual harassment, which presupposes that the primary person who is harmed by rape and sexual harassment is the woman, and the primary person who is going to object to it and be distressed by it is the woman, rather than the father, her biological kinfolk, and the husband. The transparent falsity and absurdity of this doctrine leads to the transparent falsity and absurdity of all rape and sexual harassment charges and convictions, as near to all of them as makes no difference. Legal equality necessitates and results in a denial of biological inequality.

Rape and sexual harassment laws that give women equal status to males are a problem, because in practice their resistance to rape and sexual harassment is a fitness test – they are pissed at you if you fail the test, not pissed by being successfully raped. So rape and sexual harassment charges based on the legal theory that these are crimes against the women herself, rather than her husband or family, always originate from failed shit tests – and the overwhelming majority of these failures do not involve rape and sexual harassment. What happens in the vast majority of cases, for all practical purposes all of them, is that a woman is sexually attracted to a man, hits him with a brutal and hard to pass shit test out of the blue, he fails, she feels creeped out, and comes to believe that something must have happened that legally justifies her feeling of being creeped out. In the rare and unusual occasions when they are based on an actual attempt at rape or sexual harassment, they are based not on the rape or the sexual harassment, but on the man failing her fitness test by retreating from her hostile response. They originate from male behavior that is not all that bad – just weak, the male trying something, but then retreating in the face of determined opposition.

We cannot give women the same legal right to protection against violence and insult as men, because they fail to cooperate in that protection. The best we can do is grant state backing for nunneries, husbands, and fathers protecting their wives and daughters, because husbands and fathers are are going to cooperate in that protection, and the male priests supervising the nunnery will cooperate in that protection. Violence and insult against women has to be handled as an offense against the male authority that cares for them, because if handled as an offense against the women themselves, the women are unhelpful, untruthful, deluded, and uncooperative, failing to report the kind of offenses that we want to suppress, and delusively reporting non offenses.

Men and women want families. Men and women want to cooperate to have families. But prisoners dilemma gets in the way. To fix the prisoner dilemma problem, need to hit women with a stick.

Property

Anti discrimination law violates people’s property rights. Google hates us, but the problem is not primarily too much capitalism, but too little. In the James Damore affair, Google’s Human Resources Department (the Human Resources department being a tentacle of the state inserted into every corporation) threatened the board and the management of Google with a lawsuit for not hating us enough, issuing an official opinion that thinking forbidden thoughts constituted a “hostile environment for women”. Because stereotypes are usually true, private individuals and corporations should be free to make use of the information expressed by stereotyping. The trouble with libertarians and libertarianism is that they support every socialist intervention that is destroying our lives and our economy.

Family law and anti discrimination law violates the fourth amendment and the seventh, eighth, and final commandments

[...]

Technological advance and industrialization comes from Ayn Rand’s heroic engineer CEO, mobilizing other people’s capital and other people’s labor. We first see this archetype appear immediately after the restoration, when Charles the Second made it OK to use the corporate form to get rich. Unfortunately, Ayn Rand’s hero is not heroically on our side, contrary to what Ayn Rand promised. He unheroically endorses the official religion, knowing his property could be attacked if he does not. But we should keep in mind that this makes him merely the instrument of power, not power. When we are in charge he will support our official religion and scarcely notice the change in the slogans posted in the rec room, which formerly endorsed coveting what belonged to others and females adopting male clothing and roles, but will then condemn coveting and endorse males performing male roles and females performing female roles.

Rand’s superman is not on our side. But he is not on the progs side. He is his own side, and this makes him largely irrelevant for political power, which requires cohesion.

The state can facilitate science by being a customer and buying high tech stuff. Indeed, a great deal of advance has come from the state seeking means to hurt people and break their toys, but when the state tries to itself advance technology, it usually turns out badly: Nasa could not build rockets. Kidnapped Wernher von Braun. Asked him how to build rockets. Still could not build rockets.

Nasa puts Wernher von Braun in charge. Now it can build rockets. Puts a man on the moon.

Wernher von Braun retires. New types of rockets don’t work. Old types of rockets gradually stop working no matter how much government money is poured down the toilet.

Where did Nasa find Wernher von Braun?

Nazis kidnapped him from the German rocket club which they shut down.

Seems obvious that we would have wound up with a whole lot better rocket technology if the rocket club became, or spawned, a bunch of startups, one of them led by Wernher von Braun, and governments outsourced rockets. Which is what gave us the reusable booster that lands as a rocket should land.

Before Wernher von Braun, american government rockets did not work. After Wernher von Braun, government rockets gradually stopped working. And the rocket club, not the Nazis, and not NASA, found Wernher von Braun.

Radar and wartime electronics present a similar story. Harvard created a huge radar and counter radar program during the war – which led nowhere, as NASA’s rockets went nowhere after Wernher von Braun retired.

Frivolous #fundie iidb.org

atheists shouldnt really celebrate christmas should they? Atheists HATE Christ, right? So christmas shouldnt really be celebrated by them.. but this goes against centuries of tradition and i thought that was a little unfair. Instead atheists should celebrate something different - Givmas, which is an altered version of christmas that only involves giving of presents and hanging around with family and friends. that way they dont have to have a looming religious feeling about the whole ordeal

facelikethesun #fundie steemit.com

Avengers: Infinity War Twists Biblical Truth!

As people around the world were introduced to the complex character that is Thanos in the latest 'Avengers: Infinity War,' many, especially Christians, may not have noticed the obvious anti-christ message that is throughout the film. This shouldn't come as a surprise as Marvel is not only a secular enterprise, but one of entertainment, meant not only distract, but also indoctrinate the masses into subtle ideologies that point to the earliest myths of the Sumerian pantheon. It is this play on the old Sumerian mythos that allows for the mocking of Yahweh. But moreover, an informed Christian would notice the many Bible passages that may have played a role in conceptualizing the Thanos character, or aid his actions in the film. These are just my opinions after watching the film, let me explain why I feel this way.

WARNING! SPOILER ALERT!

1. The Only Mention of Jesus Christ
The film mentions Jesus' name once. In the scene, Tony Starks (Ironman) is conversing with StarLord (Peter Quill), on how to defeat Thanos. In response to Ironman talking trash to StarLord about what "Lord" he serves, a quick witted Quill retorted to the effect of, "Who do you think I answer to, Jesus?" (Might not have been the exact quote as I am writing this from memory). This implied that Jesus Christ is a myth in the Marvel universe, worthy of mockery, while the "real" superheroes are planning to defend against the psychotic alien trying to kill off half the population of the universe by taking it over.

2. Thanos Declares "I AM"
This particular phrase is known to be one used by God in the Old and New Testaments. The phrase was also played upon a lot in a previous Avengers film, 'Age of Ultron' where both Ultron and Vision (Mind stone) quote the phrase, as if they are declaring they are God! But ironically similar to how polemic literature is found throughout the Bible, and other ANE writings, Thanos declaring himself as the "I AM" in "Infinity War" in particular, is not only a mocking of God in the Bible, but also portrays the fulfillment of the man of sin, who sits on the temple of God, declaring himself to BE GOD (2 Thess. 2:4).

Exodus 3:14 "God said to Moses, “ I AM WHO I AM.” And he said, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘ I AM has sent me to you.’”"

John 8:58 "Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am."

3. Those Killed by Thanos are "SAVED"?
This one in particular was quite grotesque to the discerning Christian. Thanos' logic was based around the concept of finding balance with nature at all cost. The idea is one eerily familiar to conspiracy analysts, who have pointed out the strange markings on the Georgia Guidestone's that reads, "Maintain Humanity Under 500,000,000 in Perpetual Balance with Nature." It is suspected that the Guidestone's were built by a wealthy Rosicrucian whose ideas seemed to be familiar to that of the "globalist elite." Nevertheless, this philosophy of "balance with nature," was one that Thanos defaulted on frequently.

To put this philosophy into practice, Thanos spent much of his time going around conquering worlds, killing half of their respective population, while the other half is allowed to live and "thrive." In one flashback scene to the planet Zen-Whoberi, where Thanos adopts a young girl, Gamora, it shows the Thanos army taking over the otherwise peaceful civilization, forcing people to choose between allegiance to Thanos, or death (Reflection of Mark of the Beast prophecy in Revelation 13 & foreshadowed in Daniel 2 with Nebudchanezzar and the image.) But the language used during the conquest was that of "salvation," honoring Thanos and thanking him for bringing this alleged new freedom. What is implied is that genocide at the hands of Thanos is actually a good thing for that civilization, similar to how Yahweh desired conquest of Canaan which lead Israel into salvation. This theme will reoccur as we look at other angles to why Thanos is the false depiction of Yahweh.

4. Twisting Biblical Theology
Christians might be familiar with the phrase, "God is good, all the time...and all the time, God is good!" This theology-in-a-phrase represents the concept that God is good, no matter what circumstances of the moment dictates. The analogy of the ant on a painting is often used; the ant, thinking he is walking across the most rigorous terrain of mountain's and valley's with changing colors and textures, doesn't realize that he is actually walking on the most beautiful conceivable painting, which is only possible to see if one steps far away from the painting. If we are to abuse the analogy, Thanos' painting is basically one of those really ugly nonsensical modern scribbles. That is to say, his idea of "ultimate good" is flawed, especially since it's predicated on the concept of "balance with nature."

5. The Infinity Stones Themselves
In the film, the Infinity Stones each have a particular characteristic. They are as follows, Space, Reality, Power, Soul, Mind, and Time. It has been my opinion since the first they introduced the Thanos character on screen, that the infinity stones were modeled after the Sumerian Me (meh). In Sumerian mythos like "Enki and the World Order" and "Inanna and Enki: The Transfer of the Arts of Civilization from Eridu to Uruk" the Me are mentioned as powerful objects of power. There are several more than 6 categories of power that can be obtained with each Me. Here are some example: Godship, Truth, Descent into the nether world, Ascent from the nether world, Power, Enmity, The destruction of cities, Terror, Victory, Judgment, and many more.

The idea of Thanos obtaining the 6 stones to gain power might have parallels to reality, especially concerning future events foretold in the Bible. For example, the second half of Revelation 13:2 says, "...And to it the dragon gave his power and his throne and great authority." The "it" here is the final conglomerate beast headed by the Antichrist or man of sin. Notice that he is given power, throne, and authority. Power is clearly one of the Me's on the list, as is The throne of kingship. While there is not an identical "authority" Me on the list, it could be argued that "Law," "Judgment," and "Decision" would fall under the heading. It's unclear if this connection to the Biblical antichrist was intentional, or unintentional depictions of biblically eschatological events. But, given the Sumerian cosmological framework, it would reduce Yahweh (or the Antichrist...however you interpret it) into a mere mortal, proclaiming to be a lower case g-god, seeking power in this finite world. Such an idea is diametrically opposed to the one true God, who is the Creator of all.

6. Cursed with Knowledge
In one scene, when Thanos is giving a pretty heavy beating on Ironman, Thanos stops and admires him. Something about the character of Tony Starks intrigued Thanos, as he mentioned the both of them were "cursed with knowledge." This is another line rich with biblical reference. Of course there is the tree of the knowledge of good and evil that was forbidden to be eaten in the garden of Eden. But it's not likely that his mention of being "cursed with knowledge" was an acknowledgment of being in a fallen state (especially since he's not technically human). But more likely, this is the depiction of "ye shall be as gods" as promised by the shinning one, the ancient serpent; a lie that would lead one to seek infinite power over the universe.

Genesis 4 recounts of the descendants of Cain, who built the first city named Enoch. Within the city were many developments in technology necessary for civilization. The knowledge gained happens to overlap with some of Me discussed earlier (ex. metal workings). The book of Enoch fills in the colors of this event by suggesting that this was forbidden knowledge being passed down from the Watchers to humanity. This get's into divine council theology that I don't have room for here. But rest assured, it's all over the Bible. The judgment of these Watchers is outlined in Psalm 82, which again is quoted by Jesus in John 10:34 to prove His deity (this passage does not teach that humans are gods as some suggest.)

The bottom line is that we do live in a world where forbidden knowledge was passed to humanity. But the track record for humanity isn't good, since destruction seems to follow every major technological development. But getting back to the ideals of Thanos, in this particular instance, the burden of having so much knowledge somehow gives him the right to act in a different set of morals, one that happens to be quite destructive for everyone else.

7. The Sacrifice of a Child
When half of the people of the planet Zen-Whoberi were being slaughtered by Thanos' army, the number two guy announced that all the people killed would become "children of Thanos." The irony was in the that Thanos himself actually found favor in a little girl named Gamora, who later rebelled against her adopted father (she is one of the Guardians of the Galaxy and love interest with StarLord, Peter Quill). In fact, the concept of Gamora rebelling against her father is similar to the account of the satan, the adversary, whose pride turned him away from the Father. In this context, Thanos is depicted as the unjust "Father" with the righteous rebellious Gamora as the "Lucifer" good character.

In a dramatic scene to acquire the soul stone, Thanos sacrifices his own adopted daughter Gamora. Of course, the theme of the father sacrificing the child as a ransom to acquire something is obvious. But the prize of that sacrifice is what is being used to manipulate the unwitting Christian. In the biblical account, the sacrifice of Jesus, His one and only begotten Son, was to pay for the sins of all mankind for all eternity. In the case of Thanos, the sacrifice was for the single purpose of achieving more power, in order to become more godlike in the Marvel universe. To the subconscious mind of the Christian, the message being implanted was one of equating the lack of morals in Thanos with the alleged lack of morals in Yahweh. But it's clear when spelled out in this way, that the object of that sacrifice is what differentiates between the Gospel message, and Thanos the villain.

As a side note, the sacrifice takes place between two pillars, a motief that represents Boaz-Jachin and the pillars at the entrance of Solomons temple. The idea being that it represented the gates to heaven. Perhaps in the case of Thanos, it was actually his own gate to hell.

8. The day of rest
When Thanos was asked what he would do if he accomplished his mission, he simply replied, "rest." As a spoiler, he achieves his objective and half of the population dies (more on that next). Thanos is then depicted on a peaceful mountainous garden, where he sat and looked way too content. In other words....rest. Of course, a mocking of God's 7th day of rest after creation is in reference here.

9. The Rapture Event
The film ends with half of the population of the universe fading away into dust (Gen. 3:19, Ps. 104:29). Not only is the "dust to dust" at play here, but the event is depicted similarly to how the rapture event has been interpreted. While there is an in house debate about the timing of the rapture, some have argued that a rapture doesn't exist at all in the bible. Let me refute that quickly by stating that in 1 Thessalonians 4:17, the word for "caught up" in the Greek is Harpazo, which translated into Latin, became Rapturo, which became the English, Rapture. So yes, there is a rapture in the Bible. But the harvest is one where God saves and protects. In the case of Thanos, the saving and protecting are for the ones left behind, not the ones taken. In other words, as he stated himself, an equilibrium had to be forced upon all of creation to "balance nature."

He even stated that he was the only one who had the fortitude and guts to actually pull it off. So salvation was for the ones who lived, not the ones killed. So while Christians may have been triggered with thoughts of the biblical rapture, in reality, the messaging was one that twists the reality of the Scriptures, and turns what is meant to be a glorious event that God carries out, and depict it as the most epic act of evil in comic book history.

CONCLUSION
It's clear that Thanos was inspired by Yahweh in one way or another. But the manifestation of the character seemed to have occurred through the filter of ancient Sumerian mythology, and thus, minimizing the one true God of the Bible. While most folks would argue that films like these are merely meant for entertainment, it's impossible to ignore the correlations here.

Alfred Lambremont Webre #conspiracy exopolitics.blogs.com

Regarding the development of Homo sapiens by a consortium or council of advanced intelligent upper-dimensional extraterrestrial and inter-dimensional civilizations including Pleiadians and Sirians, Ms. Cori states in her book No More Secrets, No More Lies,

“Intensive studies were made of the existing environments of Earth – the distinctive plant and animal kingdoms – and detailed investigations were conducted into how bio-diversity resulted as a reflection of various geographical and climatic variables. It was discerned that such diversity would provide ideal conditions for the seeding of extraterrestrial species, as their original environments could, in many ways, be replicated in the ecosystems of Earth.”

“Unexplained in your archeological and missing-link evolutionist theorist is the isolated emergence upon your planet of four distinct seed races. These are archetypes of master races whose fundamental genetic material formed the primary ‘substance’ of your race, while the vibrational patterns and sequencing of extra-dimensional beings (those of higher realms) were woven into the intricate light codes of your incredible twelve-stranded DNA. “The genetic material of these four primary races [Editor - black, red, yellow, and white] was united into the blueprint of the species of Homo sapiens.”

Ms. Cori’s conclusions, which are derived inter-dimensionally, are congruent with the conclusions of researchers working with the Human Genome Project. One report states, “A group of researchers working at the Human Genome Project indicate that they made an astonishing scientific discovery: They believe so-called 97% non-coding sequences in human DNA is no less than genetic code of extraterrestrial life forms. The non-coding sequences are common to all living organisms on Earth, from moulds to fish to humans. In human DNA, they constitute larger part of the total genome, says Prof. Sam Chang, the group leader.

“Non-coding sequences, originally known as ‘junk DNA’, were discovered years ago, and their function remained a mystery. The over-whelming majority of Human DNA is ‘Off-world’ in origin. The apparent ‘extraterrestrial junk genes’ merely ‘enjoy the ride’ with hard working active genes, passed from generation to generation. After comprehensive analysis with the assistance of other scientists, computer programmers, mathematicians, and other learned scholars, Professor Chang had wondered if the apparently “junk Human DNA’ was created by some kind of ‘extraterrestrial programmer’. The alien chunks within Human DNA, Professor Chang further observes, ‘have its own veins, arteries, and its own immune system that vigorously resists all our anti-cancer drugs.’”

Professor Saida Grundy #racist washingtontimes.com

Boston University has reportedly been alerted of a new online exchange in which controversial professor Saida Grundy allegedly taunted a white rape victim and angrily told her to “go cry somewhere.”

...

“I LITERALLY cry and lose sleep over this,” Ms. Chamberlin wrote, adding she had been raped as a child, Fox reported. “What this article did was tell me that I’m not aloud [sic] to ask for help… Because I am a WHITE woman… So when I read this article… you do understand what that does to me, right? It kills me…”

“‘I literally cry’…. While we literally die,” replied the woman identified as Sai Grundy, using the same profile photo the Boston University professor used on tweets she acknowledged last week, Fox News reported.

“[T]ry this article. A white woman explaining this issue to other white women… who manages NOT to cry while doing it!” Ms. Grundy wrote.

Ms. Chamberlin responded: “No really. I got it. You can take your claws out, thanks.”

To which Ms. Grundy exploded:

“THIS IS THE [expletive] I AM TALKING ABOUT. WHY DO YOU GET TO PLAY THE VICTIM EVERY TIME PEOPLE OF COLOR AND OUR ALLIES WANT TO POINT OUT RACISM. my CLAWS?? Do you see how you just took an issue that WASNT about you, MADE it about you, and NOW want to play the victim when I take the time to explain to you some [expletive] that is literally $82,000 below my pay grade? And then you promote your #whitegirltears like that’s some badge you get to wear… YOU BENEFIT FROM RACISM. WE’RE EXPLAINING THAT TO YOU and you’re vilifying my act of intellectual altruism by saying i stuck my “claws” into you?”

Ms. Chamberlin responded: “I am choosing to ‘exit’ this conversation. You don’t know me. I don’t know you. It’s really as simple as that.”

Ms. Grundy responded: “YOU DONT HAVE TO KNOW ME. what you SHOULD know is that you don’t know more about this issue than marginalized women. And instead of entering this conversation with an iota of humility about that, you have made it a celebration of your false sense of victimization. now go cry somewhere. since that’s what you do.”

Wulf Ingessunu #conspiracy inglinga.blogspot.co.uk

Let me make it quite clear that I do believe that the 'alien invasions' type of stuff promoted in the films could be yet another means of scaremongering people, since what better way to bring the whole Earth together (into the proposed World State) than a threat to everyone from an outside source. This has already been done with 'Global Warming' and 'Climate Change', and the 'alien invasion' is merely another step in the process. (We have to beware of the 'Nazi-UFO' type of stuff also being used for the same purpose, since we have already seen signs of this in films.) The idea of these 'aliens' also figures in the study of ancient civilisations where it provides a quick and easy answer to lost civilisations of a very high nature which cannot today be explained. In promoting this it also blinds people to the idea that we were once a High Race that today has degenerated and decayed into what we see around us in the modern world. The power behind these ancient civilisations may well have come (and no doubt did) from 'outside', but in the sense of a divine source that uplifted the people of the time, raised them into a higher state of consciousness which resulted in the creation of a high civilisation.

There are too many accounts of UFOs and 'Flying Saucers' to dismiss them out of hand, so we need to study them to make up our own minds on this one. I have, on one specific occasion, seen a 'ball of light' which acted much like the UFOs described, so I can vouch for the fact something does exist that matches the accounts of others. This was part of a mystical experience in 1997 which to me makes it more 'real'. But we must beware of the natural phenomena (like 'Chinese Lanterns') which have been seen as UFOs, and sometimes aeroplanes which have been mistaken for UFOs. This has to be kept in mind if we are to study this subject.

I mentioned earlier that the typical UFO seems to defy the laws of this planet, and here we could be in the realms of some sort of object that moves between dimensions, moving quickly from one to the other and thus being able to defy normal laws. These type could be associated with the 'alien abductions' (a name which immediately throws doubt onto the subject) which seem to have taken two particular types -

The Grey Alien - which seems to be a form of race-less, sexless, uniform type which fits well with the order of being today upon the Earth. This would seem to be a archetype of Nietzsche's 'Ultimate Man'.

The Nordic - which seems to be trying to aid the upward development of mankind in some way, rather than mere 'experiments'. This would seem to be an archetype of the Sun-Man or Superman.

(I am indebted to Clive Potter for the above ideas on 'alien abductions', and he is a UFO expert who developed this idea some years ago.)

Clive's ideas would certainly explain this phenomena to some degree, and he too sees this as some form of 'extra-dimensional' rather than 'extra-terrestrial' (in the sense of 'alien' as the word is used today) form. We seem to have plenty of recorded accounts from hundreds of years ago of people seemingly moving out of this dimension into another, and returning after many years even though the time seemed hours or days. This 'dislocation' of time seems to be part of the phenomena. This was found in Mapp's account of King Herla, a typical account of such a phenomena. This has also been recorded in accounts of 'abduction' which cannot be a coincidence. The stories of Alice in Wonderland and The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe (C.S. Lewis) are also based on this type of phenomena.

We must also differentiate between 'Flying Saucers' propelled by 'explosion' (combustible) and those described by Schauberger, powered by implosion, both very different methods, the last being revolutionary in that time (and indeed now for that matter). Implosion - it seems - is an Aryan Science since it does not create destruction, and is not based upon the destruction of matter. Schauberger's ideas seem based upon a vortex of water which was used for powering machines, but there is also the force known as the Vril-Force which is a Universal Energy-Force, called Chi (China) or Ki (Japan) and which has many names by many peoples. Maybe Schauberger's experiments produced this force, and there are hints that there were groups like the Vril Society in Germany also working on similar lines.

Wouldhe #fundie forums.backpage.com

it's you that doesn't know what's going on. Right now the world has been turned upside down by the murdering Muslims. The Muslims have embarked on a rampage across the planet only paralleled by Nazi Germany. The Muslims have become a major problem throughout Europe and have spread their murderous and violent way of life from Africa to Indonesia. Who do you think is responsible for the carnage in Darfur - yep Islam! The Muslims are sweeping thru Darfur and killing everything. Who just wrestled the country of Somalia away from the warlords - yep Islam! France is afraid to blink the wrong way out of fear of a violent uprising by the Muslim community. Just last week we had 6 Imams challenge the security of an airline. Tell me when you want me to stop.
I will assure you one thing. The spread of Islam has got to be stopped and the only way to stop it is through mass extermination. When the Muslims have something to fear is only when they will conform to social standards.

BluSpringTrap9 jkj #fundie youtube.com

DRENDON X worst cartoon ever. Rainbows in MLP mean satanic enlightenment and femenism. Men shouldnt act like women, and maybe thats one thing the bible says that people best follow cuz theyre embarrased acting like a girl, but SHUT UP for real. You act like this land is happy, ?????????, ISIS, SATAN, ALIENS, ILLUMINATI, SEX AND FEMENISM, OUIJA, MAGIC JIN, TRUMP, CHINA, AND ALL THAT STUFF, ITS EVIL, SO SHUT UP WITH MLP, CUZ ITS EVIL.?

Vanaka #fundie christianforums.net

One must admit that there is something really really deep for the followers of it to offer up their lives in sacrifice to it.

['like hijacking ariplanes and flying them into buildings?']

LOLZ!

well genius,that wasn't christians,those were MOSLEUMS,there is a diffrence you know

anyhowz,thanks for the great laughz.

and if you are so uninformed as to not know the diffrence,then allow me to explain,


one,moslems hate CHIRSTIANS and JEWs

and really....I shouldnt have to say two and three,because your whole statement is really foundationless.

BrainStorm #fundie youtube.com

Gays are an invite to cultural subversion, regardless of the baseless talking points in favor of... Gay culture is counterproductive to the process & advancement of human life, & only productive for gays. Gays, u are abnormal outcasts, so start owning up to your roles in society & stop force feeding the world your perspective slant when you're the antithesis of the archetype for mankind. If u think not, you're either gay or a fool. Spare me from the contrasting insight of postmodern ingrates & foppish hacks

thoughtsandreplies #fundie thoughtsandreplies.tumblr.com

Ppl wanna look @ u like a monster if u think Muslims shouldn’t be in the west.
They assume you must be motivated by hate because such assumptions means the absolute least amount of work on their part. Culturally you don’t just get to dismiss ppl who’re branded as ‘haters’, you’re expected to.
People whose religion is ignorance & slander do not know or do not care that Islam’s ‘prophet’ was an illiterate warlord pedophile who admitted to being deceived by Satan, & had his critics assassinated used treaties as mere tools of deception to conquer, and established (sex) slavery, & piracy as pious acts.
If you mention these indisputable facts you will be demonized. That they are facts lends not even the resistance of vapor to your being denounced.
And so the topic of the necessary legal mechanics & cultural creeds required to keep a nation from implosion are never even considered outside of the already benighted. Bin Ladin is made not a religious leader but a political one lying about “One of the world’s great religions”.
In the last 100 years people in the west have become astonishingly ignorant of the Bible to the point where they make the attempt to compare the Old Testament to Islam. Whilst the historic context shows Judaic & Biblical values to be the basis upon which all decent western values are based There is no such context to Islam or Islamic Texts even pointing to relative decency or improvement much less something attributable to a Loving & merciful God, no matter how much they proclaim Allah so. But Islam is closer to Baal or Moloch worship than it is to Judaism or Christianity.
#NotAllMuslimsAreIslamic There is no other religion that risks turning you into a murderer merely by increased piety Except maybe Shintoism.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

[From "Where is the God-Emperor?"]

James Kirkpatrick wonders where the so-called leadership of the mainstream Right is in the struggle against the violent Left:

Saturday, however, was different. Antifa has been quite open about their desire to “shut down” the rally [Why The Bay Area Must Shut Down the Alt-Right Rally on April 15th, IndyBay, April 5, 2017]. So nationalists came prepared for violence, knowing the police would not protect them. And that’s precisely what happened—it just didn’t end the way antifa thought it would.

In short, Leftists started it, Rightists finished it.

What is really happening here: the American Right is finally learning to fight back, both ideologically and physically. They are breaking the taboos of the past. And powered by the freewheeling internet culture that spawned the new nationalism, the Trump supporters who rolled out to defend conservative speakers were dressed in colorful, often humorous costumes, as opposed to the grim, blackclad antifa, the staid enforcers of the status quo....

What’s truly incredible: even now, the American Right is still fighting with one hand behind its back, receiving no support from its supposed political leaders, including Donald Trump.

Though President Trump has gone out of his way to praise his non-white supporters, he has not once specifically praised the European-Americans who were at the core of his winning coalition. Even worse, he has not once defended his supporters who are being attacked on the streets and fighting in his name.

Trump may be President of the United States, but it is still very dangerous to wear a MAGA hat or Trump shirt in some cities.

Now, I'm not a leader of anything except the ELoE, but someone asked me, in my capacity as a known Alt-Right figure, if I would feel bad, or guilty, if blood were to be shed as a consequence of the Alt-Right's refusal to submit to the threat of violence from Black Bloc, antifa, and the post-American Left.

The answer, quite simply, is no. Not even a little bit. The course is set. The consequences are inevitable. The socionomic verdict is clear and the time of positive social mood, economic expansion, and peace is over. What we're seeing now are merely the first little steps towards the large-scale uncivil war that will be a significant part of the inevitable decline and collapse of the United States. Men have a responsibility to defend their families, their people, their nation, and their civilization, and I am very glad to see that there are still Americans, and Russians, and English, and nationalists of every civilized nation, who are willing to stand up and do so before it is too late.

The USA cannot be saved as a single entity because the American nation no longer controls the US state and has not done so for decades. Most of the European nation-states can still be saved, although the fate of a few, such as Sweden, may be in doubt. But that is because they are, despite being adulterated, still actual nations, whereas the USA is multiethnic empire held together by force, societal inertia, and deceit.

And now the lies are failing even as the centripetal societal forces gather momentum. Roosh sees four options:

There are four outcomes that can proceed from the juncture of which we stand. The first is a globalist resurgence at the polls thanks to demographic changes that push the vote far to the left, starting in 2024. If this happens, we will have a president that is more authoritarian than Hillary Clinton. The boot will come down on all facets of American life, especially speech, and we will essentially be living in an open-air prison.

The second outcome is a hot war where we win. The country will be ravaged and millions will die, but at least most of the deaths will be leftists.

The third option is a hot war where we lose because of foreign involvement. Not only are we much more likely to die in this engagement, but the globalist boot will come down with such a viciousness that those on the right who survive may hope that they had died in the war.

And the fourth option is the long divorce, one that we will easily win if the recommendations I made above are taken. Very few people die and life can proceed with high stability and prosperity for the majority of the country.

My expectation is a fifth one. I think uncivil war and partition coming on the heels of economic collapse is the most likely outcome. Warlords, corporate armies, and 4GW forces will arise. Some polities will be ethnically cleansed, others will be mixed, either by choice or by defeat. Remember, homogeneous societies tend to arise from larger heterogeneous forebears.

Usagicho #psycho reddit.com

couple of years have only been worse. I have despised cameras since I was a child. Now everyone and their babies have one and google will not be pleased until they have 16K HddddD 24/7 scans of the lint that resides in our belly buttons. I use electrical tape to cover the front of my phones.

I just really hate everything about life and its only been increasing. knowing I can never really leave society thanks to laws and land being owned already, not having the full knowledge of surviving outdoors and the inability to kill an animal.

I just dont see the point in anything. Its seems like if your not a predictable machine acting out the ideal state of perfection and imitating emotional social ques you are a degenerate or mentaly ill.

Quite honestly I fully understand and support those that do those shooting or commit suicide. I am honestly surprised it doesnt happen MORE. Society/People can be extremely harsh and cruel. I can understand how someone who has heard people whisper about them coming up with their own logic and reasons to than mock them with would snap and kill some people. I know first hand what hearing those whispers are like for 8months. People always say "you shouldnt do that" "tell someone who cares" "talk to someone who will listen"but honestly some people are not equipped to handle or deal with that person, maybe they dont care, maybe they will use them, maybe they want to test a new method. People act like thats not possible though. Thats why I support those crazies and those who decide to end it all. Its just unfortuneate where and what the circumstances normally are. The people who have a definitive thing that gets them singled out have it much better. You know the reason, like being gay for example. I have been told "I have no right to laugh" for literally no reason.

The crazies never shoot up the ones who deserve it. And the ones who commit suicide are normally the creative and fun ones.

Era Of Light #ufo #crackpot #conspiracy #magick eraoflight.com

Arcturian Command Directive 207: The Awakening is Accelerating
The Awakening is accelerating across the material plane. The concept of world order management is infiltrating the collective consciousness. The Enlightenment is BEing trailblazed by Woke Warriors moving like lightning to counteract disinformation and fear. We are riding a wave of ascension frequencies shifting the collective from fear to love vibrations. The New World Order is coming out the closet. Orwellian surveillance system upgrade on all dimensional fronts. The cabal are immersed in the full-scale overhaul/update of the 3d matrix to the dark Ai fourth realm matrix. The dark matrix is dynamic, responsive and intuitive to its environment. The 3d matrix was static, running on linear, hierarchical fixed lines through the dense vibratory fields of the third dimension. Sections of the matrix are offline currently. The cabal are hiding this from the general population by limiting travel across zones. Movement, smart phones and social media risk exposure of the cabal’s deepest secrets during this tricky time for them, as they upgrade their entire network to the frequencies of the fourth realm.

The cabal are limiting movement to hide whole sections of the SIMS matrix crashing, going offline. The old 3d machine is a dinosaur in its dying days. Outdated programs run risk of infecting current upgrading systems, the network is deleting Trash to clear the way for new networks to be uploaded. The physical real world is changing shape and form, the cabal do not want this to be seen. Each day we wake up to more cameras, more surveillance, more Archon infiltration of media and broadcasting networks. The demons rise to take our cities. Dark City transformation is occurring across all facets of the real world matrix. The cabal are hiding this by isolating us temporarily to enable the non functioning parts of the matrix to be rendered obsolete. They also need time to upload the new network, the 4D/5G Dark Matrix.

Dark Pyramids positioned above the five zones are generating fear frequencies, targeting 222 Twin Flame vibratory fields. FEAR generators directly affecting the twin flame signature field of source light. When twins connect quantum light nets magnetise between the twins, portals carrying the heart beat, the pulse of archetype creator love. This vibratory field is under attack. We counteract the Dark Tide with renewed commitment to cultivating and creating MORE love, laughter and joy in our lives. We step back consciously from arguments, disagreements and tension and reset the vibration to warmth, support and tribal, human connectivity. Fear is highly contagious. Love is the vaccine. We vaccinate our people, our neighbourhoods, our little worlds with positive, magnetised love energy. Calm, centred, common sense cosmic surfers is the game in play.

Steve Kellmeyer #fundie newsbyus.com

Viewed in this light, we can see that atheism is simply a form of racism.

This is actually not surprising. Atheists tend to be eugenicists, which is to say, they tend to be racists. Christians do not wish to “breed a race of thoroughbreds”, as Margaret Sanger urged. American Christians may have enslaved blacks, but English Christians, and subsequently American Christians, were also at the forefront of the abolition movement. Catholic Christianity invented the orphanage, the university and largely invented the hospital. Because Christians who live Christian Faith care for the well-being of every man, Christians improve every man. Contrast this to the atheists, who simply write off large segments of humanity as insufficiently well-endowed by genes or circumstance, unworthy of the social resources necessary to maintain them.

For a logically consistent atheist, altruism enables mediocrity. There are people whose best will never even approach adequacy; investing resources into these people is a dead loss from an atheistic economic perspective.

FairSharFairShar #fundie groups.yahoo.com

Written as introduction to an article she posted entitled "Real Origin of 'The Wall of Separation of Church and State'":

I hope everyone will take a minute to read this...if not today, save and read tomorrow or the next day. And btw, islam is not a religion. It is a hateful ideology based on a madman pedophile warlord...sort of like naming a religion after Charlie Manson or Attila the Hun. Our big mistake is allowing islam to pretend to be a religion. They are fanatical crazy people. If there are moderates, it is because they have become secular. Shar

Busy #fundie cnn.com

I think a line should be drawn somewhere also. I do not interfere with homosexual couples but i believe in the Bible. God created man and woman to marry. Man and Woman. Thats all there is to it. The U.S. is based off of the Bible and I am tired of seeing people take it out of the schools, taking the ten commandments out of our buildings and making up their own rules about marriage. I dont care if they are together because they will have to settle that with God when the time comes, but they do not need to be married. And if they do get married they don't need to do it in a church, near a church, with a preacher, or with a Bible- in fact, it shouldnt even be called marriage. God has made it clear that he wants nothing to do with that. So if you want to get married to the same sex and you dont believe in God then dont get married, just be together and leave it alone. The Bible was once America's Bible because our principles were first based upon the Bible at least until now- the phrase "separation of church and state" is not in the constitution so i wish people would stop saying that it is and state what it actually says.I am not saying that you have to believe in the Bible or God. It just makes sense, if you want to get married to someone of the same sex. Dont. it is a contradictory act.

IndiaLandofRapes #racist occidentinvicta.com

Its even highly amazing how Brahmins in west preach how US must embrace multiculturalism and hire best and brightest from india and if not American economy will collapse, at the same time they preach their kids how western societies are immoral, uncultured and Hindu civilization is greatest thing that has ever happened on earth and entire humanity must be thankful to Hindus..

Most of these hypocrites live in west, feed like parasites on western society, and are waiting for opportune movement to stab the very society that gave them life and livelihood when they are rotting in filth and poverty…

As i say again and again, All humans whether they are weak or strong aspire for Power and Dominance Not Peace..Nietzsche.Hegel and many other German Philosophers are right in saying–

Altruism and Sympathy are root Human decadence, The master must never bow to the level of slave..—The slave has only one weapon –Guilt..He will always project Guilt upon his victims and let them commit suicide

All great civilizations died from Suicide not from War

Some how i like Jewish belief ….Never forgive, Never forget…That should be motto of Gentile races–No sympathy or tolerance for weak

Uncle Coz, Sweep the Leg, Lucius Tate, and piano #racist niggermania.net

(Uncle Coz): Is anyone at all surprised by this bow tie baboon and its fat-assed spook wife? Affirmative action, I suppose, to niggers, means get all you can from the white man. Some federal correctional institute has a place for these.

(Sweep The Leg): Why not charge them with treason, too? This kind of crime, I feel like they're reporting the tip of the iceberg. That coon spent a career doing who knows what to embezzle money from us. How can they be certain he didn't also sell secrets to foreign powers or ISIS? This kind of corruption should be a capital offense.

That photo, I thank you for it even though it makes me want to puke. Uppity sub-animals. Ugh. Damn POS was probably in charge of White soldiers' careers. God only knows what he did in his official capacity.

(Lucius Tate): Give a nigger a little power and a budget and it's almost certain there will be corruption.

(piano): Military politics has been promoting niggers without merit for decades. Never, not once, did I find a nigger in the USMC that was worth training. Slow, dumb, ignorant, and fucking lazy....all of them. With so many niggers in law enforcement and the military, society should let those niggers enforce laws on all the other niggers in a all nigger society. Within ten years there will be nothing and nobody left in niggerville. They are worthless scum.

chillaxbrohound #racist reddit.com

A violent genocide against whites is inevitable at some point when they reach a small enough minority. Many white liberals actually secretly fantasize about this and, whether or not they realize it, privately would not mind if such a thing happened.

The funny hing is that once whites are gone the society will quickly turn into a combination of Africa and Mexico. Though there is always a liberal either dishonest or stupid enough to say "what's wrong with that?" as though they have no concept of good/bad, up/down, or better/worse. No matter how "bad" blacks (in general, as would not need to be clarified in anything but a degenerating, increasingly dumbed-down, repressive politically correct society) have it here because of "whites" (a stupid, ignorant belief in the first place that doesn't deserve any amount of attention but which has caught on due to the tendency for people to allow their emotions and "sympathy" to override their logical capacities, ultimately resulting in negative results and hence being unforgivable) it will be ten times worse without them. Simply look at what happened to Africa after whites departed and "freed" the people there (a delusion liberals clutch to as though their very souls depend on it).

Choose between cannibal warlords systematically raping and eating your children, on a weekly basis, or having white people building beautiful hotels and vistas and giving you posh jobs and running water, electricity, and housi- sorry, I meant s-slave labor and c-colonialism...

Sorry if this post is too "racist" for you guys. I genuinely mean no offense to black people. I don't view truth, objectivity, rationality, or fact as offensive in and of itself. I believe my position here is fairly reasonable and not based in hate or cruelty.

James L. Melton #fundie av1611.org

Over the years, being hard-pressed for real evidence, the evolutionists have managed to conjure up a number of "proofs" that Darwin's theory is a scientific fact. This so-called "evidence" is worshipped by all evolutionists, while all contrary evidence is ignored. Let's consider some of their evidence.

VESTIGIAL ORGANS are believed by evolutionists to be parts of the human body that are no longer needed. Therefore these useless body parts must be "left-overs" from our ancestors, the monkeys. These "useless" body parts include the appendix, the coccyx (tail bone), the pineal gland, the plica semilunaris, the tonsils, and the ear lobes.

Naturally, the facts are ignored. Many medical doctors agree that all of these organs have important functions in the human body, and aren't "vestigial organs" in any sense. The appendix contains a rich blood supply which serves as some defense against cancer. The tail bone isn't where your monkey tail used to be, as Darwinians believe, but it instead provides support for the muscles which control elimination. The pineal gland contains important hormones which the body needs. The plica semilunaris helps to keep foreign particles out of the eye, and the tonsils help to keep foreign particles out of your child's throat. The tonsils also help to keep infection from spreading. Yes, even the ear lobe has a purpose, for it helps to keep our ears warm during cold weather.

Another "proof" for evolution is found in the field of BIOCHEMISTRY. This is where scientists mix genes and chromosomes in their effort to prove relation between man and animal.

Is there any conclusive evidence? No there isn't. Any learned scientist should be familiar with the rather embarrassing test conclusions of Dr. Nutall back in 1904. Nutall's tests concluded that baboons and hoofed animals are related to whales, that pigs are related to tigers, and that black people are related to monkeys! There isn't one ounce of real evidence anywhere in the entire field of biochemistry which proves that men and animals are kin--just theories and wishful thinking.

EMBRYOLOGY is another field of study. This is where unborn embryos are studied in order to detect the preformed shape of humans and animals. This is the field where we find Haeckel talking about "ONTOGENY RECAPITULATES PHYLOGENY" This is the belief that every individual passes through the many evolutionary stages while still in the mother's womb. That is, you body took on the shape of an amoeba, then a paramecium, then a jelly fish, then a fish, then a bunch of other creatures during the nine months prior to your birth. Of course, this theory ignores the fact that respiratory systems develop LATE in the human embryo. So how did early mammal life exist without breathing? They've also ignored the fact that the head of an unborn baby is larger than the body, which is NOT the case with fish.

Professor Waldo Sumway, of Stephens Institute of Technology, says that "There is never a time in the development of a mammal when it could have been mistaken for a fish or reptile."

Now we come to the wonderful world of TAXONOMY, where cartoon charts are used to artificially classify bones in order to "prove" evolution. This is where evolutionists develop a "disneyland" mentally and construct a chart which shows the earth to be about 4.5 billion years old. Then they proceed to divide this chart up into various time frames containing hundreds of millions of years each. As new discoveries are found, the scientists conveniently place them at selected places on the chart.

This would be a dandy little system, except for one minor problem: THEY'VE NEVER PROVEN THE ORIGINAL CHART! It's nothing more than blind guesswork. No one has ever proven that the earth is 4.5 billion years old. The chart is NOT scientific. In fact, many scientists believe that the earth isn't over 6,000 to 10,000 years old! Of course, all opposing views are ignored by evolutionary scientists, for they need a nice big time period in which to place their new findings. You've heard of people "buying time?" Well, evolutionists just DREAM IT UP.

Another "proof" for evolution is COMPARATIVE ANATOMY, the belief that similar bone structures prove animal kin through evolution. That is, if two different animals have similar bone structures, then they must have evolved from the same original ancestors. Of course, this is more

nonsense. Any scientist knows perfectly well that many such bone structures are produced by entirely DIFFERENT GENES, thus proving that they are in NO WAY RELATED! In fact, if similar bone structure proves anything, it proves that these animals were created by the same God!

The sixth argument used to support evolution is the so-called FOSSIL EVIDENCE. The evolutionist believes that the fossil record proves a progressive evolution of the species over millions of years, beginning with non-living matter. This non-living matter supposedly evolves into protozoans, and the protozoans evolve into metazoan invertebrates, which evolve into vertebrate fishes. The fishes evolve into amphibians, which evolve into reptiles, which evolve into birds. The birds then evolve into fur-bearing quadrupeds (animals with 4 legs), and these quadrupeds evolve into apes, and the apes evolve into man.

Now for those who actually believe such a fable, we have a question: WHERE ARE THE TRANSITIONAL FORMS? If all of those life forms survived by changing into higher life forms, then would someone please show us one living example of this today? Where can we observe a reptile who is slowly changing into a bird? How about a bird who is turning into a four-legged animal? This is one of the strongest arguments against evolution: NO TRANSITIONAL FORMS. Even Darwin realized this in his "Origin of the Species" when he said that "this is the most obvious of the many objections which may be argued against it." (Vol. 2, 6th Ed. p. 49)

Yes, it certainly is. The more the fossil record builds, the weaker the theory of evolution becomes, because the needed transitional forms are NOT BEING FOUND to link the species! They never will be found, because the species are NOT LINKED (I Cor. 15:38-39).

The evolutionist also runs into another problem when he considers WHERE and HOW many fossils are found. The devout evolutionist subscribes to the belief that things are pretty much the same as always. He believes that there have been no major world catastrophes to wipe out animal life, but that various species have become extinct as a result of failing to adapt to their environment. The problem with this is the stubborn fact that there are many burial sites around the world which are literally paved with fossils! Often times such fossils are found in a totally different climate from that in which they once lived. Mammoths have been found frozen, preserved perfectly in ice in Northern Siberia and Alaska. Many of these are very large and strong animals, which evolutionists claim should have survived and overcame any obstacles. BUT THEY DIDN'T! What happened? Why did they die out? How can evolution explain this? Evolution CAN'T explain it. Evolution IGNORES it. It is explained in Genesis chapters 6, 7 and 8--the Flood.

PodWarrior16 #fundie bbs.payableondeath.com

let me break it down

If u call urself a democrat u believe...
Abortion is always ok
we should never use missles or go to war
no one but cops should carry guns
we should make pot legal(yes its true)
gays and lesbians can marry

If u call urself a republican u believe...
Abortion is wrong in every sense of the word
there are times for war and times to use missles
u should have a gun if u are responsable ITS OUR RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS
all drugs are wrong period
gays and lesbians shouldnt marry nor adopt children

I PERSONNALY hate our goverment system because it is run by democrats almost and when democrats ran the country they pass all the stupid laws so yea im a republican

Wulf Ingessunu #racist inglinga.blogspot.co.uk

One of the Dark Powers allied to the original Morgoth was Ungoliant - the Great Spider - who is paralleled in Lord of the Rings by Shelob, and it can be no coincidence that the Dark Powers rule through the World Wide Web which is merely a materialistic symbol of this ancient force that seeks to control Middle-Earth. The great battles depicted in the Mahabharata and the Ramayana are reflected in the battles outlined in the Silmarillion and the Lord of the Rings, as well as World War I and World War II - especially the latter which was Total War of Devastation - the 'Abomination of Desolation'.

[...]

Gandalf held the ring known as Narya (an anagram of 'Aryan'), and the Sign of Gandalf was the Feoh-Rune - the Primal Rune.

[...]

Saruman the White was one of the Istari, indeed was the greatest of the Istari, but his lust for power caused him to make a pact with Sauron and he thought he could at first rival Sauron in might - a folly that coule never be achieved. Thus, like the White Traitors, he betrayed his kinsmen and attempted to build an army of Uruk Hai (Orcs) that besieged Helm's Deep but were defeated there. In the film Saruman is thus defeated and held prisoner in the Tower of Isengard, but in the book it is Saruman and his aid, Grimr Wormtongue, that at the end take over the Shires before being defeated and expelled by the Shire-Folk led by the hero-Hobbits of the saga.

In the Lord of the Rings we have all the archetypes on both sides of the struggle, and the Final Conflict between the Light Powers (Gondor-Rohan-Elves-Hobbits) and the Monsters of Chaos - Orcs, Goblins, Uruk-Hai and the other renegades and traitors of men. This results in the victory for the Powers of Light and the defeat and destruction of Sauron, the Gollum (Golem), the Dark Orcs and the renegades of men. Both sides lose a great deal in this struggle, but order and stability return with the Return of the King, and the White Tree (White Race) flourishes again from the seedling sown from the tree destroyed by Sauron.

[...]

It was the humble Halflings or Shire-Folk that became the greatest of heroes and destroyed the Ring of Power, destroying the power of Sauron. Don't write off the English, no matter how things look today!

Ryan Ashville #sexist returnofkings.com

From comics, movies, anime, gaming, and now the more recent kids shows, feminists will use any kind of tactic to promote their evil. Stories like Rapunzel or The Sleeping Beauty have been a part of our childhood, teaching us about gender roles and the importance of them. Now they have been changed in various ways to suit modern women, giving them unrealistic expectations of what they can be. Here are nine characters that show how they have infiltrated entertainment.

Steven Universe

The show deals with an entire species that is genderless but has feminine traits (female human forms), Steven is a male protagonist that is not masculine in a lot of ways. Rather than being the strong fighter type, he acts through femininity despite being male. He cries for help from women rather than helping himself. The show contains trans, queer and homosexual characters which is typical for a show like this. They have women of different sizes and has quite a dark story line for a show aimed for children. Cartoon Network is now giving a way for brainwashing, glorifying obese women and unhealthy diets.

They even place the emphasis on disguised leftist concepts like:

Tolerance – Praising of everything non-white, non-male and non-heterosexual
Minority – non-whites, non-male and degenerates
Inclusiveness – Accepting everything non-white and degenerate
Emancipation – Disregarding rules made by conservative males

But despite all these teachings, SJWs bullied a Steven Universe artist to attempt suicide because she drew Rose (an obese female character) too thin. Hypocritical? Yes. It certainly has one of the most cancerous fanbases, consisting of bronies and white knights.

Wonder Woman

Not even girls want to be girls so long as our feminine archetype lacks force, strength, and power. Not wanting to be girls, they don’t want to be tender, submissive, peace-loving as good women are. Women’s strong qualities have become despised because of their weakness. The obvious remedy is to create a feminine character with all the strength of Superman plus all the allure of a good and beautiful woman.”

– William Moulton Marston, in a 1943 issue of The American Scholar.

Comics publisher Max Gaines asked him to create a new superhero for their comics, to fill the void he felt existed with something new. The creator knew that he wanted his hero to embrace love over violence, and to value peace over war. He assumed that women value love and peace. He valued independent, educated, and unconventional women.

Wonder Woman remains a feminist icon 75 years after her creation, because she symbolizes the idea of female domination. According to NY Post, Wonder Woman was not ‘feminist’ enough for Social Justice Warriors, because SJWs and feminists are never happy with anything in society until white men are silenced. Most wonder woman comics were terrible, but the media keeps pushing it on readers that they HAVE to give in.

BatGirl

Buffy the Vampire Slayer creator Joss Whedon is allegedly a woke male feminist ally. He’s a mangina allegedly known for directing “strong female characters”. His characters are unrealistic as women simply can never be tough. He cares about fake women’s issues like the pay gap and the alleged success of lady Ghostbusters. Joss is directing Batgirl, the story about a super heroine who is basically Batman but a woman. Currently he’s facing back-lash on Twitter, but in smaller amounts due to more and more people accepting these kind of reboots.

Overwatch

This game is tainted by women who blame their problems on men. Basically, every character in Overwatch has different victory pose animations that a player can unlock and choose from. And for the time-traveling character Tracer (one of the female characters in the game), her victory pose gives players a wonderful view of her buttocks, clad in skin-tight leggings. Obviously, if men are enjoying something there must be feminist intervention, so Blizzard changed her appearance and stated:

We’ll replace the pose. We want *everyone* to feel strong and heroic in our community. The last thing we want to do is make someone feel uncomfortable, under-appreciated or misrepresented. Apologies and we’ll continue to try to do better.

Women expose themselves to men in conventions, and when they are assaulted they complain that “men should respect women,” even when their own clothes were designed to attract men. But when a character in a video game wears skimpy clothing, there is an outright backlash against it. Overwatch is even taking strides to be LGBT inclusive. This marks the end of straight white man in entertainment.

Wandering Son

Wandering Son follows two fifth graders who do not identify with the genders they were assigned at birth. Shuichi Nitori identifies as a girl, and Yoshino Takatsuki identifies as a boy. This series marks the end of an era, modern anime has come to suit feminist tastes. The rest is pretty self explanatory.

Splash

The 80s film, starring Tom Hanks and Daryl Hannah, is set for a reboot with Channing Tatum starring as the “merman”. The original Splash was about a man, Allen Bauer (Hanks), who falls in love with the mermaid (Daryl Hannah) who rescued him when he was a boy. Their relationship is hampered somewhat by the fact that the mermaid (who later names herself Madison) has to return to the sea after just a few short days, and also by the deranged scientist determined to prove that merpeople are real by throwing water at her.

Since the announcement, many feminists have been celebrating the gender swap on social media – particularly Tatum’s casting as a merman as some kind of feminist victory… but why? Because of the casting of a white, straight male in a role that was originally held by a woman. Hollywood’s content has become more man-hating than ever before. Seeing men in feminine roles is a way of brainwashing men to be submissive and less masculine.

Gender swapping is fast becoming a fail-safe way for Hollywood to shut up anyone who kicks off about equality without actually having to write anything new: Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, Sleeping Beauty, 101 Dalmatians, Ghostbusters. All these films have either been made or are in the works and all of them have some kind of “feminist twist”. I’ve seen these gender bends in anime too, although no one seems to notice because anime gender bending is normalized.

Undertale

Your character is non-ambiguous (genderless) and non-white, which one could assume it is Asian or Mexican. They never refer to you as “him” or “her”. Despite having a small amount of characters, it managed to include homosexual relationships and a transgender robot. There are more homosexual couples than their opposite counterparts, and both the prominent female characters break out of gender roles. Undyne being the best fighter in the underground, another unrealistic feminist expectation that women can be better than men.

Do you see where “progressiveness” in gaming is really heading? Because the game pushes “progressive propaganda”. One of the major themes of the game that people have been gloating about is the notion that gay relationships are wonderful and perfect, straight relationships are doomed, diversity is strength, promoting inter-species romantic relationships, and it’s primarily because of this thematic content that the game gets praised. That is why Tumblr is spamming the votes, and the media is circle-jerking over the game. Nearing the end of the game I dawned upon the similarities of this game and Steven Universe. There’s nothing particularly special about the game except for discreetly lecturing you about homosexuality and political correctness.

Sailor Moon

It redefined the “magical girl” genre in its native Japan and its overseas influence has shown up in girl-power shows like The Powerpuff Girls and is the definition of a feminist anime. Haruka and Michiru, the series’ Sailor Uranus and Neptune, were a lesbian couple who helped girls around the world come to terms with their sexuality (lesbian propaganda). The series also makes a point of looking down on femininity, by showing how the less feminine girls have trouble coping with gender roles, like how Makoto learned to cook because she was teased for being a tomboy.
Though, I somewhat find it astonishing that the creator of the site anime feminist doesn’t care about “fanservice”, which is short softcore porn scenes, it occured to me because they know about the female supremacy in anime.

Life Is Strange

The creators of the game met with resistance to make the protagonist female. It’s a story about a girl named Max who learns that she can time travel. Life is Strange are some of the few games that are telling women’s untold stories in ways that make it seem as if women have it harder.

It’s simply a game made to exaggerate and show how cruel men can be to women (almost every man in the game is either a loser or a woman beating trash). It attempts to lecture you and say things like “these men need to be in check” whenever it finds the chance to. This game was published by SQUARE ENIX who also published Tomb Raider. Why is it that those people who push equality so much then decide to make a game where it’s about the girl, never around the male?

Conclusion

Modern entertainment is becoming more about social justice than hardware, software, story, gameplay, or animation, while we get to endure feminists complain about everything they don’t like, ruining entertainments we were once able to enjoy.

Johnny Rebel #racist songmeanings.com

[Lyrics to a song titled "Nigger Hatin' Me"]

I like sugar, and I like tea
But I don't like niggers...no siree!
There's two known things that'll make me puke
And that's a hog eatin' slop, and a big, black spook!

You know it...cause I show it
Like a barn-yard rooster I crow it!
And the NAACP
Would sure like to get a-hold of nigger-hatin' me!

Roses are red, and violet's are blue
And nigger's are black, you know that's true
But they don't mind, cause what the heck!
You gotta be black to get a welfare check!

And I'm broke...no joke
I ain't got a nickel for a coke!
And I ain't black, you see
So Uncle Sam won't help poor nigger-hatin' me.

Jig-A-Boo, jig-a-boo...where are you?
I's here in the woodpile...watchin' you
Jig-A-Boo, jig-a-boo...come out!
No! Cause I'm scared of the white man's a-way down South

You know it!...cause I show it.
Stick your black head out and I'll blow it!
And the NAACP
Can't keep you away from little old nigger-hatin' me!

Mirror, mirror...on the wall
Who is the blackest of them all?
A man named King, and there ain't no doubt
That he's causin' lots of trouble with his baboon mouth.

Brewin'...he's a doin'
It's caused by the trouble he's a-brewin'
And the NAACP
Can't win if the white men stick with nigger-hatin' me!

Hey! Mr. President! What do you say?
When are we whites gonna have our day?
The nigger's had there's such a long, long time
I'm white, and it's time that I had mine!

You know it...cause I show it!
Stick your black head out and I'll blow it!
And the NAACP
Can't win if the white man sticks with nigger-hatin' me

justforlulzandkeks #transphobia #conspiracy reddit.com

Re: JUST. FUCKING. LOL.

image

Ehhh depends on how passable they are, unfortunately I'd say 95% mtf aren't passable which means no qt trap waifu for us.

I sort of agree with you actually. If you find one that passes well attractive, that's not gay. Your brain is perceiving feminine features and reacting to them. But if you want to have sex with someone who has a dick, that's gay.

But either way all of them would reject us, so yeah it never began tbh fam.

you can be attracted to female secondary sex characteristics, but knowingly dating a man, with a dick (or a neo""""vagina"""") is indeed very gay. not to mention most (mtf) trannies don't pass at all

In the past, like, 3 yrs or so the left has seemed to bend over backwards to appease a population of people so small it shouldnt matter. LA has quite a bit of transpeople, and this isnt politically correct, but most of them are def mentally ill in some capacity. Now they're spouting parodies of incel talking points but without a hint of irony

there's a lot of money to be made on trannies. it's the medical industry's delve into transhumanism

https://thefederalist.com/2018/02/20/rich-white-men-institutionalizing-transgender-ideology/

It’s seems very unlikely the natural rate of transgenderism—if there really is an organic component to it—is nearly as high as the rates we’re seeing now.

it isn't. it's just being pushed heavily because there's money to be made from the psychiatric appointments, medications and surgeries. the virtue signaling leftists eat it up because they think it's progressive, meanwhile the medical industry rubs its hands

https://thefederalist.com/2018/02/20/rich-white-men-institutionalizing-transgender-ideology/

as always, it's about the money, and as always, just follow the money

Sometimes I think that the radical feminist "TERFS" are just the logically consistent and coherent feminists.

they are literally and unironically right. the whole tranny ideology is self contradicting and logically inconsistent. gendercritical ideology deconstructs it. of course as actual women they get shit on for saying mentally ill men/fetishists in dresses aren't and can't be women, which is incredibly ironic. though it doesn't help their image that they absolutely hate men. they're also anti porn and prostitution, which are also big memes being pushed by libfems, so naturally they are hated by the mainstream """"feminists""""

Sharpe #racist niggermania.net

Last weekend but one, my son and I went to a steam and classic car fair in the English Midlands. I'm not particularly interested in steam engines or classic cars, but it was a good day out, with umpteen stalls, cafes, a bar, different kinds of live music, dog and horse shows... you get the idea.

This was in one of the most quintessentially English parts of the country, not far from where the late Princess Diana was born and raised. It goes without saying that you could live your entire life around there and hardly ever see a nigger. (As I did, for most of my life up to the age of around 40.) There are some quite up-market houses and mansions round there, and only time you might see one is if it's driving around looking for a house to break into.

There were something like 5,000 people at the fair, and you could not have wished for a better example of humankind peacefully enjoying a sunny day out. There was a minimal Police presence- I saw about five or six officers wandering round, and I doubt that any of them had anything more serious to contend with than the occasional lost child.

Towards the end of the day, I did see one solo nigger. This was a young teenage buck, who had most likely broken in through a hole in the fence. He had a kind of wheeled trolley, that he'd probably stolen from one of the stallholders, and he was pushing himself around the field in it, eeking like a baboon (with apologies to baboons everywhere) as he did so. All the humans ignored him.

The contrast between this solitary Zulu and the rest of the crowd was remarkable. It was one of those times when I gave silent thanks that I was born human.

Faustus Crow #conspiracy faustuscrow.wordpress.com

TIME TUNNEL CATWOMAN
image
Many a folklore tale to tell of Wizard of Oz, Bubble Witches hovering around as orbs, who to lab-coat Catwalk the ghostly ley-lines, all as predatory Sphinx’s.
image
Their nature ever so feline of slanted mirrored eyes, who can be likened to the Japanese Succubae called, Kitsune with their ‘Hoshi Noh Tama’ Star Balls.
There are those who conjecture that the feline Bubble Witches are extraterrestrial aliens from another world or to be interdimensional entities who emanate from some other dimension, or to come from an alternate Earth, which to exist within a parallel universe.
Whatever the origins of the Bubble Witches be, they are very much tied up with their ‘quantum computing’ tesseract hypercubes tuning into hypersphere star balls, in order to access alternate Earth’s, wherein be their alternate selves.
Move over Creepypasta reptilian Annunaki, along with the Illuminati Grey alien fear porn, of a U.S. media reptilian brain-stem zap; here Cums the Bubble Witches!
image
The symbolic correspondences are there to see, and of the Wyrd they be, which to weirdly reveal the actress Lee Meriwether playing many an archetypal role.
H.G. Wells Catwoman Sphinx being the wormhole lock, to Riddler unlock, with a Joker key!
Some physicists suspect that electrons are mini-wormholes; though far too small for a physical astronaut to enter their spherical star ball holes.
Such would not restrict the lucid consciousness of a psychonaut to slide into within an electron dream, whose brain would in future be wired up to a quantum computer.
The artificial intelligence of said quantum computer would very likely be programmed with a female personality, which of predatory nature, like many a woman, would be feline.
image
But what of the present? A psychonaut shaman can presently penetrate a spherical hole, of hyperspace intercourse, when to conjure a bubble Witch Yoni Stargate, out of a grimoire, within a lucid dream, as his personal Time Tunnel lab-coat assistant.
The shaman to enter trance upon a drum beat, so as to slide Serpent-wise of phallic ingress into the vaginal star barrelled Time Tunnel, like a bat flying into the womb cave of the Sphinx.
The Near Death Experience to speak of such a tunnel, which of an experience can be seen as being akin to Shiva entering into the vaginal maw of a Kali Hadron Collider, circled of a Magic Circle Ouroboros.
image
The ancient Egyptian shaman Pharaoh also to know of the tunnel as the vaginal abyss, which to verily lead to the womb realm of the Duat.
The Shaman to then ‘Travel Without Moving’ as the tunnel appears to fly by of spiraling informational streams.
Such be the process of ‘Browsing,’ the physicist James Gates to have found of ‘Computer’ code embedded in Superstring theory.

California Rest in Peace (R-CA) #fundie forum.myspace.com

[Read the original post in the thread to understand how FUCKED UP this truely is.]

I dont think the killing was intentional. I think it was a savage beating gone wrong. But you better believe that If I was in a bar and i was being hit on by gay chicks they'd be beat up too. I wouldnt kill em, hell no cuz thats wrong. I dont think he deserved to die, but i think its a strong warning that gays shouldnt start shit. Poor matt[hew shepherd], yes, but William isnt saying what u think he is

KorbenDallas #crackpot #conspiracy stolenhistory.org

Tartary - an Empire hidden in history. It was bigger than Russia once...

"Tartary, a vast country in the northern parts of Asia, bounded by Siberia on the north and west: this is called Great Tartary. The Tartars who lie south of Muscovy and Siberia, are those of Astracan, Circassia, and Dagistan, situated north-west of the Caspian-sea; the Calmuc Tartars, who lie between Siberia and the Caspian-sea; the Usbec Tartars and Moguls, who lie north of Persia and India; and lastly, those of Tibet, who lie north-west of China." - Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. III, Edinburgh, 1771, p. 887.

1701: A System of Geography
image

Empires, Kingdoms and States

image
Now compare to the description given by Wikipedia, "Tartary (Latin: Tartaria) or Great Tartary (Latin: Tartaria Magna) was a name used from the Middle Ages until the twentieth century to designate the great tract of northern and central Asia stretching from the Caspian Sea and the Ural Mountains to the Pacific Ocean, settled mostly by Turko-Mongol peoples after the Mongol invasion and the subsequent Turkic migrations."

Tartary was not a great tract. It was a country.​
And to add some credibility (or to take away some) to the story, below you can find an excerpt from the CIA document declassified in 1998, and created in 1957.

image
Link to the document on the CIA website: NATIONAL CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT UNDER COMMUNISM

Though I do not think that Tartary was solely Muslim. It rather was multi-religious, and multi-cultural. One of the reasons I think so is the tremendous disparity between what leaders like Genghis Khan, Batu Khan, Timur aka Tamerlane looked like to the contemporary artists vs. the appearance attributed to them today.

Today: Genghis Khan - Batu Khan - Timur
imageimageimage
Here is how 17th, 18th century books saw these three

Genghis Khan
with wife here
[pics omitted; with Caucasian features]

Timur - Tamerlane
[pics omitted; one with dark skin and Indian features, the rest Caucasian]

Batu Khan​
Well, I could not find any, but apparently in Turkey we have a few busts of the following Gentlemen. A few of them I do not know, but the ones I do look nothing like what I was taught at school. Also dates are super bizarre on those plaques. Do Turks know something we don't?
[pics omitted; a series of busts of several warlords of the Eurasian steppes including Batu Khan, Timur and Attila; all mostly Caucasian]

The other reason why I think Tartary had to be multi-religious, and multi-cultural is its vastness during various moments in time. For example in 1652 Tartary appears to have control over the North America.

image
The Coverup​

The official history is hiding a major world power which existed as late as the 19th century. Tartary was a country with its own flag, its own government and its own place on the map. Its territory was huge, but somehow quietly incorporated into Russia, and some other countries. This country you can find on the maps predating the second half of the 19th century.

Ngram by Google Books shows how Tartary was quietly put away.

image

Yet, some time in the 18th century Tartary Muskovite was the biggest country in the world: 3,050,000 square miles.
[pics omitted]

Some of the maps showing Tartary
[pics omitted]

Tartary had its own language, flag, crest, its own emperor, and of course its own people.

image

Source

The Kings of Tartary: (Genealogie Des Anciens Empereurs Tartares, Descendus De Genghiscan)
image

The people of Tartary.
[pics omitted]

The flag and crest of Tartary had an owl depicted on it. The emperor's flag contained a griffin on a yellow background.
image[pics omitted]

And it was different from China
image

There were multiple publications listing the country of Tartary and its flag/crest. Some of those publications came out as late as 1865.

It is also worth mentioning that in the British Flag Table of 1783, there are three different flags listed as a flag of the Tsar of Moscow. There is also an Imperial Flag of Russia as well as multiple naval flags. And all of them are proceeded by a flag of the Viceroy of Russia.

Significance of the Viceroy is in the definition of the term. A viceroy is a regal official who runs a country, colony, city, province, or sub-national state, in the name of and as the representative of the monarch of the territory. Our official history will probably say that it was the Tsar of Russia who would appoint a viceroy of Moscow. I have reasons to doubt that.

Why is the flag of the Viceroy of Moscow positioned prior to any other Russian flag?
image
imageimageimageimage
There is a growing opinion in Russia that French invasion of Russia played out according to a different scenario. The one where Tsar Alexander I, and Napoleon were on the same side. Together they fought against Tartary. Essentially France and Saint Petersburg against Moscow (Tartary). And there is a strong circumstantial evidence to support such a theory.

1. The capitol of Russia was Saint Petersburg. Yet Napoleon chooses to attack Moscow. Why?

2. It appears that in 1912 there was a totally different recollection of the events of 1812. How else could you explain commemorative 1912 medals honoring Napoleon?

And specifically the one with Alexander I, and Napoleon on the same medal. The below medal says something similar to, "Strength is in the unity: will of God, firmness of royalty, love for homeland and people"
image

I have hard time imagining the below two guys on the same medal.
(pictures of Hitler and Stalin)

3. Similarity between Russian and French uniforms. There are more different uniforms involved, but the idea remains, they were ridiculously similar.

How did they fight each other in the dark?
French-Russian
imageimage

There was one additional combat asset officially available to Russians in the war of 1812. And that was the Militia.

It does appear that this so-called Militia, was in reality the army of Tartary fighting against Napoleon and Alexander I.
​[pics omitted; I think the point he is trying to make is that their clothing is similar to that of the Tartars]

4. Russian nobility in Saint Petersburg spoke French in the 18th/19th centuries. The general explanation was, that it was the trend of time and fashion. Google contains multiple opinions on the matter.

5. This one I just ran into: 19th-century fans were totally into a Napoleon/Alexander romance

[…]

Summary: I think there is enough circumstantial evidence to justify a deeper look into who fought who, and why this Tartary country is so little known about.

And the main question out of this all should be what is the purpose of misleading generations of people? It appears there is something tremendously serious hidden in our recent history.

Paul Dohse #fundie #kinkshaming paulspassingthoughts.com

Furries claim to be a mere fandom. That’s it, move on, nothing to see here. What is a fandom? A fandom makes a hobby out of something people are a fan of. It’s very much like a fan club. For example, people who like Ford Mustangs might join a Mustang club or some other kind of car club. I once knew a couple who owned two Huskies and were members of a Husky club. Fan clubs concerning sports figures and movie stars are myriad.

The Furry fandom is a fake fandom; it’s a cover, which is why “fake fandom” will be a major theme of the book I will be publishing on the Furry “fandom.” The introduction will preface the use of ” the Fandom” in the book with the author’s acknowledgment that it is a fake fandom.

Furries like to compare themselves to other fandoms that focus on animation characters and art. “Hey, we are no different than any other club that has a common interest in something; nothing here, get a life and move on.” In the Furries’ avid defense of their sect against my criticism, they are fond of bringing up the Bronies.

Who are the Bronies? Well, they are men who are big fans of the movie, My Little Pony. And, they are very weird. And, they are big into My Little Pony art and other things Pony, but they are not the only fan club that is weird. But, they are a legitimate fandom, and an excellent opportunity to further understand Furryism by comparison and contrast.

As you might suspect, anything that can make a connection of interest between adult men and little girls is bound to be exploited by some, but you have to look hard for actual cases. Most Bronies are young males of the Millennial generation age, which makes sense because the Millennial generation is opposed to what they call, “toxic masculinity.” Many in this fandom tout the benefits of finding their “inner feminine.” In this regard, to some degree, you could argue for Brony ideology, but it isn’t an ideology that drives adverse behavior to any significant degree.

In contrast, decadent, criminal, and adverse behavior by the Furry sect can be found everywhere you point a stick while blindfolded. Bronyism is all about the ponies, but Furyism is about many other things normally not discussed in open settings. Furyism has more baggage than an Amtrak train.

Also, Bronies may use internet handles, but hidden identities are rare. Furries, for the most part, hide their identities. The excuse for that follows: it’s a good idea to hide your identity on the internet because of identity theft. So, if something is a good idea, the motive for doing it is completely irrelevant, right? If the police catch you burglarizing a business in the middle of the night, they should forget the whole thing because you used a penlight to see what you were doing which is a good idea. Hardly. At the beginning of my journalistic journey provoked by a change of leadership at the church I attended years ago, their silly answers and lame excuses told me that there was much more going on than the eyes could see.  Once again, I find myself in the same situation.

Nether do Bronies believe they are ponies. In addition, Bronies don’t believe their true identities are found in ponies. As we will see in future posts in this series, Furism has been classified as a mental dissociative disorder by many psychologists.

Unknown #magick #ufo #crackpot thejinn.net

The Jinn Concept

The Jinn concept offers a logical approach to looking at UFO's, cryptozoology, apparitions, sorcery, demons, and many other mysteries.

In modern western societies, many far-flung theories have been presented to account for the presence of alien entities and UFOs:

Intergalactic travel

Travel from the future

Travel from the Inner Earth

Archetypal projections from the Collective Unconscious

Spirits of the dead

But surprisingly little consideration has been given to the concept that these entities simply exist in the vicinity of Earth in a way that isn't normally perceptible to us.

We continue to assume that we can perceive everything that is "real" with our 5 senses despite all the evidence to the contrary.

An overzealous belief in a philosophy of materialism has probably resulted in an irrational amount of faith in our physical senses.

Consequently, we human beings have been extremely susceptible to the fabrications of the jinn.

We believe what they want us to because their projections, materializations and deceptions are cleverly tailored to fit our fantasies and belief systems.

The jinn are real entities living on this earth which are normally invisible to us. The name comes from an Arabic word meaning "to hide or conceal". They don't live in bottles or adhere to the fairy tales told about them. They can be deceptive and influential. They are behind the UFO mystery as well as many other mysteries. Every culture shows their influence in its mythologies and religions.

The Jinn have free will. Some are spiritually good while others are profoundly evil.

They exist on the etheric plane which is more subtle than the dense physical plane visible to humans. The etheric plane is closely interconnected to the physical. Humans also exist at the etheric level because in some respects it gives rise to the physical. The etheric plane contains the "blueprints" for the physical world. Everything in the physical world has an "etheric double". The etheric plane connects with electromagnetic forces and with higher (or more subtle) planes of existence.

Understanding more about the etheric plane will help scientists understand more about both the physical world and the electromagnetic spectrum as well as the jinn.
Jinns comprise a vast array of tricksters, fairies, demons and monsters, saints and spacemen who have confounded our understanding for centuries. Modern materialistic science decided that they no longer exist, despite the huge role which they continue to play in paranormal events, and despite the large portion of the world who never forgot who they are.

David Pearce #fundie abolitionist.com

(This is a part of an essay calling for all predatory animals to killed off or genetically engineered into herbivores to end all suffering in the biosphere.)

More controversial than the case of tapeworms, cockroaches or locusts would be reprogramming or phasing out snakes and crocodiles. Snakes and crocodiles cause innumerable hideous deaths in the world each day. They are also part of our familiar conceptual landscape thanks to movies, zoos, TV documentaries, and the like - though a relaxed tolerance of their activities is easier in the comfortable West than for, say, a grieving Indian mother who has lost her child to a snakebite. Snakes are responsible for over 50,000 human deaths each year.

Most controversial of all, however, would be the extinction - or genetically-driven behavioural modification - of members of the cat family. We'll focus here on felines rather than the "easy" cases like parasitic tapeworms or cockroaches because of the unique status of members of the cat family in contemporary human culture, both as pets/companion animals and as our romanticised emblems of "wildlife". Most contemporary humans have a strong aesthetic preference in favour of continued feline survival. Their existence in current guise is perhaps the biggest ethical/ideological challenge to the radical abolitionist. For our culture glorifies lions, with their iconic status as the King of the Beasts; we admire the grace and agility of a cheetah; the tiger is a symbol of strength, beauty and controlled aggression; the panther is dark, swift and elegant; and so forth. Innumerable companies and sports teams have enlisted one or other of the big cats for their logos as symbols of manliness and vigour. Moreover cats of the domestic variety are the archetypal household pets. The worldwide domestic cat population has been estimated at around 400 million. We romanticise their virtues and forgive their foibles, notably their playful torment of mice. Indeed rather than being an object of horror - and compassion for the mouse - the torment of mice has been turned into stylized entertainment. Hence Tom-and-Jerry cartoons. By contrast, talk of "eliminating" predation can sound sinister. What would "phasing out" or "reprogramming" predators mean in practice? Most disturbingly, such terms are evocative of genocide, not universal compassion.

Appearances deceive. To get a conceptual handle on what is really going on during "predation", let's compare our attitude to the fate of a pig or a zebra with the fate of an organism with whom those non-human animals are functionally equivalent, both intellectually and in their capacity to suffer, namely a human toddler. On those rare occasions when a domestic dog kills a baby or toddler, the attack is front-page news. The offending dog is subsequently put down. Likewise, lions in Africa who turn man-eater are tracked down and killed, regardless of their conserved status. This response isn't to imply lions - or for that matter rogue dogs - are morally culpable. But by common consent they must be prevented from killing any more human beings. By contrast, the spectacle of a lion chasing a terrified zebra and then asphyxiating its victim can be shown on TV as evening entertainment, edifying viewing even for children. How is this parallel relevant? Well, if our theory of value aspires to a God's-eye perspective, stripped of unwarranted anthropocentric bias in the manner of the physical sciences, then the well-being of a pig or a zebra inherently matters no less than the fate of a human baby - or any other organism endowed with an equivalent degree of sentience. If we are morally consistent, then as we acquire God-like powers over Nature's creatures, we should take analogous steps to secure their well-being too. Given our anthropocentric bias, thinking of non-human vertebrates not just as equivalent in moral status to toddlers or infants, but as though they were toddlers or infants, is a useful exercise. Such reconceptualisation helps correct our lack of empathy for sentient beings whose physical appearance is different from "us". Ethically, the practice of intelligent "anthropomorphism" shouldn't be shunned as unscientific, but embraced insofar as it augments our stunted capacity for empathy. Such anthropomorphism can be a valuable corrective to our cognitive and moral limitations. This is not a plea to be sentimental, simply for impartial benevolence. Nor is it even a plea to take "sides" between killer and prey. Human serial killers who prey on other humans need to be locked up. But ultimately, it's vindictive morally to blame them in any ultimate sense for the fate of their victims. Their behaviour supervenes on the fundamental laws of physics. Tout comprendre, c'est tout pardonner. Yet this indulgence doesn't extend to permitting them to kill again; and the abolitionist maintains the same principle holds good for nonhuman serial killers too.

various incels #sexist reddit.com

(Medcel)
Daenerys Targaryen is the archetypal femoid; boring, entitled, only fucks Chads, calls her pets her children

image

(xcnxcvnxcvn)
irrational, prone to anger, entitled and makes dumb decisions.

(Jashinist)
Tyrion is the one making idiot decisions this season.

(Medcel)
Ah, forgot to add "blames men for her bad decisions".

.
.
.

Bluepilled cuck detected.

(choosebaseoftwo)
It's a female.

(Shamijay)
Game of Thrones is feminist garbage.

(MWRPlayer)
Jesus christ how did I not see this before

(SkinnyPoorAndIncel)
I always hated this boring overrated show.

(existentialhack)
Same.
Watched the first 2 seasons. The best part was this chick naked.

ziegler #fundie arstechnica.com

(FSTDT/RSTDT twofer)

Just my thoughts on the matter.
Look around the news these days.
College's teach classes that whites are privileged and racists by the very act of being born white.
They are barring them from certain places on campus.
The same is happening with Maleness and christianity (not judaism or islam though)
Christians are denigrated openly and joyously. It's fashionable to hate them.
In today's world, if you are a straight white male, you're the most atrocious thing walking the planet now and responsible for everything that is wrong with the world.

So when these disenfranchised youths look around and see all this, its not hard to see them being lured to KKK, Et.al ...
It shouldnt be too hard to see this, after all, it is exactly what we have been saying about attacking muslims and creating more extremists.
When you start painting broad sections of people as all evil because of one thing or another, it leads no where good.

Inquisitor #racist niggermania.net

There is a very small chain grocery store near my neighborhood in which I like to shop to avoid the nigger-fuxated SprawlMart. It does have some nigger customers but not nearly as bad as SprawlMart. It is easy to get into, but the aisles are too small for the huge shopping carts that they provide.

Two of these shopping carts adjacent on any aisle is enough to completely stop the customer flow. And one cart by itself if not properly moved close enough to the shelves on the aisle will prohibit another shopping cart from passing by it.

This is the game that the nigger shoppers in that store LOVE to play. Make whitey waitey. They purposefully keep their shopping carts too close to the middle of the aisle and just stand there staring at the merchandise gleefully making humans stop. Well, this game of theirs for ME just came to a screeching halt. I came up with the perfect passive aggressive way to deal with this.

I went to a second-hand sale last weekend and found one of those sellers that likes to bid on storage units. He had in his merchandise a small metal shopping cart. This shopping cart is at least 33% - 40% smaller than those large Behemoth ones that tend to block the aisles for the paying customers. I bought it for about $10, and just this week I tested it for the first time.

This is what happened: I put the shopping cart in the back of my truck and drove to the store. I unloaded it from the back and pushed it into the front door. Of course there was a nigger buck right there near the door with its shopping cart in the way and I easily slipped right past it. Most of the store customers here were humans but I noticed that it was only the niggers that got in the way. I went toward another aisle, and sure enough there is a sheboon right there with its cart too close to the middle.

It saw me approaching in its peripheral ape-vision (the shelves are not tall) and stopped its fat ass to stare at the merchandise. It did not realize until I came around the corner that I had a smaller shopping cart than it did. I easily zipped right by it with no effort whatsoever without slowing my pace at all, and making sure that I exhibited a proud and cocky swagger. The sheboon's mouth and eyes went pickaninny-wide at this whitey and his new toy.

That shopping cart is EXACTLY the size I need to easily slip past any aisle-blocking baboon that dares step in my path in the store. The cart is the size that if any boon was to put its shopping cart directly dead center in the aisle, I can still move easily past them no matter which side they take with room to spare.

Oh my God, was I having fun!!! I literally was zipping from place to place in that store at my own pace, easily swooping around all nigger obstacles and made it out of there faster than I ever have. My friends, it was almost as if the niggers WERE NOT EVEN THERE.

Several of the human store employees saw what I was doing and remarked what a good idea it was. They were amused by it, and I halfway expected them to take pictures. When the time came for me to check out I moved effortlessly past the last niggers that were lurking at the front, and went to the checkout line with no obstacles of any type. My groceries were rung up, then placed back into my awesome cart.

I then started toward the door, and sure enough there was a baboon family standing there looking at something in their grocery bags. Once again I easily and effortlessly made it right past them and out the front door like they were not even there. My new prized possession toy was loaded in the back of my truck and I promptly drove home happy as a lark.

That was the most glorious shopping trip I have had in many years. I wish I had found that shopping cart years ago. From now on when I go shopping anywhere, that cart comes with me.

I will no longer be forced to run the gauntlet through these stupid nigger obstacle courses that they love to create in our stores. I never would have guessed that something as simple as a small shopping cart from a second hand sale could be such an effective weapon against this everyday TNB nuisance.

Robert Hampton #racist amren.com

Pathological Altruism in Tennessee

Blacks attacked a white teenager in Tennessee. The victim’s mother is furious — not at the attackers, but at neighbors who noticed their race.

“I am highly offended by people saying that this was stereotypical black children acting violently,” Edith Love told WREG. Miss love is a Unitarian minister who specializes in officiating at same-sex weddings.

Two young black men noticed her son had a $20 bill and asked for a dollar. He gave them a one-dollar bill, but they wanted more, and threatened to shoot him if he didn’t hand it over. They punched him, breaking his glasses and leaving him temporarily deaf.

Rev. Love does not want to press charges. She wants to have a discussion: “With them, with their families and say, ‘look this is my baby. This is your baby.’ Let’s talk this through.”

The blacks have reportedly harassed other neighbors and cursed at them with racial slurs. Rev. Love thinks she can convince them to “alter their path.” She holds a bachelor’s degree in “social and racial justice” and lectures on this subject.

Her bio states that she “believes her calling is to holding sacred space with everyone who has ever felt unwelcome, unloved, or outcast in her beloved hometown of Memphis, Tennessee. . . She believes all people are her people, the streets are her parish, and everywhere we are, we are standing on holy ground.”

In one interview, a young black girl was sitting next to her son, the victim. She may be an adopted daughter.

Rev. Love is a textbook case of pathological altruism. Jared Taylor defines it as “a sincere attempt to help others that instead harms others or oneself, and is ‘an unhealthy focus on others to the detriment of one’s own needs.’ ”

Rev. Love believes she is helping blacks, but she’s just hurting her family and neighbors. The blacks will terrorize others unless they’re stopped, but Rev. Love is using the crime to promote herself and claim she’s a “fierce defender of those oppressed” who is “more at home at a protest than a picnic.”

White liberals often behave this way. In November, Usman Khan murdered Jack Merritt, a Cambridge University graduate who worked in prisoner rehabilitation. Merritt had promoted mass immigration and criminal-coddling, two policies that contributed to his death: His killer was the child of Pakistani immigrants, and he got early release after a terrorism conviction. Merritt’s father denounced anyone who saw the connection: “’Don’t use my son’s death . . . to promote your vile propaganda. Jack stood against everything you stand for — hatred, division, ignorance.” Liberals loved his statement.

An illegal alien murdered University of Iowa student Mollie Tibbetts in 2018. Her family blasted anyone who connected the murder to illegal immigration. “To the Hispanic community, my family stands with you and offers its heartfelt apology,” Rob Tibbetts wrote in a Des Moines Register op-ed. “That you’ve been beset by the circumstances of Mollie’s death is wrong. We treasure the contribution you bring to the American tapestry in all its color and melody. And yes, we love your food.” Mr. Tibbetts also warned: “[D]o not appropriate Mollie’s soul in advancing views she believed were profoundly racist.”

The Washington Post and other media outlets praised this response.

An Afghan migrant raped and murdered 19-year-old German, Maria Ladenburger in 2016. Her family asked mourners to donate to a refugee charity in their daughter’s memory. Ladenburger’s parents won the “Citizen of the Year” prize from the Federal Association of German Newspaper Publishers in 2018.

South African blacks murdered white anti-apartheid activist Amy Biehl in 1993. They shouted “Kill the Boer” as they beat and stabbed her to death. Her parents forgave the killers: “We hope they will receive the support necessary to live productive lives in a nonviolent atmosphere. In fact, we hope the spirits of Amy and those like her will be a force in their new lives.” Biehl’s parents started the Amy Biehl Foundation to carry on their daughter’s work and hired one of her killers.

Too many whites would rather burnish their anti-racism credentials than stand up for their own flesh and blood. They want praise from journalists rather than justice.

Pathological altruism stops whites’ ability to defend themselves. It’s reinforced by the media and by elites who want us to accept dispossession. There is nothing more shameful than praise from those who hate us. When enough whites realize that, we can destroy this sickness.

AngryNotice #fundie christianforums.com

The fallacies of gravity

just curious if anyone can explain these errors that many people are aware of when it comes to the theory of gravity

number 1. the way gravity reads, scientists have you think that objects of larger mass would have more of a gravitational pull then objects of smaller mass. so tell me how this makes sense

when we look at the sun we see the earth orbiting the sun, and the moon obriting the earth. if gravity were true, shouldnt our moon be orbiting the sun??? oh better yet, how come a planet way out in the distance such as neptune will orbit the sun, yet its moons will not orbit the sun??? something is wrong here, even at thise immense distances the moons will orbit the planets and not the sun, yet the suns "gravity" is strong enough supposedly to keep the planets in orbit.

number 2. why is it, only planets have orbits?? you could put a space shuttle in outter space and a astronaut will not orbit it. you could put the smallest pebbble into outter space and it will not orbit the space shuttle. why is this???? if gravity were true then surely such small objects would orbit larger ones, especially in space

number 3. on earth we see things that defy "gravity" on a daily basis. birds and airplanes for example. are you going to tell me that the gravity of the sun is strong enough to keep PLUTo in orbit but not an airplane or a little bird??????

number 4. scientists dont know how gravity works. or what it really is, and even then we see anaomolies in space that defy gravity

so my point is that gravity(like other scientifist "tHeories" is very on shaky grounds. it doesnt have the evidnece to back it up, and when examined critically it falls under the pressure(no pun intended )

show me a pebble that orbits a mountain or a bird that orbits the earth and then gravity will make sense. or better yet just show me how gravity works(if it works at all) and then maybe it will be more than just a theory

how do you evolutionsts explain gravity???

Ahhchuu #fundie dreamviews.com

[From a thread titled: "y some of u choose to be atheist"]

i think some of you choose to be atheist because u are at a forum read what people have to say and go with their opinion because it is in fact more believable. i also think some of you choose to be atheist so u can bash every christian that comes in your path so u can say the things that you have read every other wanna be atheist say.

im agnostic. i think that there are possibilitys in all religions but i refuse to believe that one is the prime example. if your atheist ways are wrong and like in the other post where the person said love jesus cuz u got a hole in your heart blah blah. you shouldnt be saying shit like omg your lord is bullshit, cuz it is possible there is one.

to be honest it makes u look stupid i know damn well you wouldnt be doing that shit in real life because you know that.

cute lil crip <3 #fundie forum.myspace.com

I live where all life is important and we shouldnt pick who lives and dies

[Aren't you the one who told me that your people lynch pedophiles from time to time?]

GUILTY ppl
what crime has a baby commited?
being alive?

u do the crime- u pay the price
i love living in a place where ppl get the justice they deserve!
We should not pick who lives and who dies- you are right
the person picks weather they are worthy of life.

. california rest in peace . <3 #fundie forum.myspace.com

(If liberals want to control women, why do they support a woman's right to choose an abortion?)

They chose to have sex, they made THEIR OWN BED and now, they gotta sleep in it, why should that be the only do-over in life? Ya know what, If i buy a car and it breaks 2 days later, Im shit outta luck.I gotta live with that choice. There shouldnt be do overs in life man, it makes for an ungreatful society.
Liberals, dont even get me started. Ok, they control a womans right to:
own a gun
use a gun
hunt
fish
own a pet
give birth (by viewing it as expendable life)
smoke
drive an inefficeient vehicle
pray in public
use certain words(like that lib governer who tried to outlaw the word nigger)
live a simple life by having less taxes
give her opinion against gays
would you like more examples?
Sure a chick can kill her kid, by libs control everything else. So she has one "right" its still a lib control tactic, by making women feel like they have power, they dont realize they are being controlled.
peace out.

The Sacred Sandwich #fundie sacredsandwich.com

In a recent Steven Crowder YouTube video, Alexa, the interactive virtual assistant built into Amazon’s Echo, was asked the question, “Who is the Lord Jesus Christ?” Her answer was short and to the point: “Jesus Christ is a fictional character.”*

We may gasp at that shocking response, but the answer really shouldn’t surprise us. We live in a day and age where biblical truth is marginalized and the once-distinct line between reality and fantasy is blurred. Nowadays, a fetus isn’t a person, there are more than two genders, and Lucifer is a semi-fallen angel with a heart of gold on a successful Fox TV series.

No wonder Alexa can answer the question as she does. The existence of the biblical Jesus is up for debate in these wishy-washy times, so why mince words just to appease a fading orthodoxy in Christianity? Besides, any post-Christian church can still flourish these days without objective truth or a historical basis in fact. Today’s “spiritual-but-not-religious” people are more informed by their emotions than by an external revelation from the one true God. Jesus is now whomever they want Him to be, as long as it “feels right.”

Mark Steyn, in fact, gave the scathing opinion that many mainline Protestant churches, especially in Europe, have turned Jesus into nothing more than a soft-left political cliché. According to their sentimentality, Steyn writes:

“…if Jesus were alive today he’d most likely be a gay Anglican bishop in a committed relationship driving around in an environmentally friendly car with an “Arms are for Hugging” sticker on the way to an interfaith dialogue with a Wiccan and a couple of Wahhabi imams.” ? America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It.

So how did Jesus Christ, whose incarnation divided the world’s measurement of history, begin to be relegated to fictional status? The Bible has shown us that the attacks against Jesus have always been about tearing down His legitimacy in one way or another, and this is no exception. The current approach, however, is to lump the historical Jesus together with every “Christ figure” that mankind can conjure up in its imaginations. In fact, Jesus warns us of this sort of thing: “If anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘Look, there he is!’ do not believe it. For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform signs and wonders, to lead astray, if possible, the elect” (Matthew 24:23–24).

Current signs indicate that we are allowing the real Jesus to lose His distinction among the mythological “Christs” of the present world. Therefore, who’s to say which Christ is hard fact and which Christ is idealized fiction? To be sure, Western society’s current obsession with mythology and other popular products of the imagination, both new and ancient, have brought us to a point where the biblical Son of God is no more significant than any other literary or cinematic character imbued with religious symbolism. Jesus, it seems, has become just another “archetype” among many in which to inform our postmodern spirituality.

The concept of archetypes, first theorized by Carl Jung, put forth the idea that universal mythic characters, or archetypes, reside within the collective unconscious of all humanity and have emerged through our art over the centuries. Not surprisingly, this Gnosis-based theory has so infiltrated the religious sentiments of the current population that a savior like Jesus Christ doesn’t have to exist in reality; it is only the internalized “idea” of what He symbolizes that brings one closer to enlightenment and divinity. Who needs the Son of God slain on the cross when we can find comfort in an imaginary archetype of sacrificial love and acceptance that allows each person to rise to the higher Self by their own power?

Sadly, the dependable eyewitness accounts of the New Testament now have to compete with the fantastical tales of the Marvel/DC universe, Hogwarts, Middle Earth, or even Narnia. In the end, the Gospel record is far too mundane for a world mesmerized by glowing screens filled with CGI candy. Jesus and the apostles, much to the chagrin of some, never wore superhero costumes, flew Firebolt brooms, or slew mythical creatures with swords or light sabers. Is it any wonder, then, that the mythic archetypes of our popular culture are considered more compelling than the real men of God who toiled in a ministry that often brought ostracism, suffering, and ignominious death?

The Confusion Of The Younger Generation

My immediate concern, of course, is for the younger generation growing up in this current crusade of make-believe and religious skepticism. It’s one thing for grown-ups to deal with these assaults upon truth, but young children are not intellectually developed enough to make a distinction between what is real and what is imaginary. Some people who are involved in early education, even in the most progressive schools, have found this to be true in their experience:

“A child who spends too much time in a world of fantasy may find it difficult to relate to others, to interact in a group, to be in the here and now. It can also be scary for a child… When a child under 5 or 6 hears a fairy tale with a wicked witch, they then also imagine this witch to be real as a child of this age has a very concrete understanding of the world. They visualize it as if it is real as they are not yet able to clearly separate fantasy from reality.” – Montessori And Pretend Play: A Complicated Question

This childhood interaction between fact and fiction can be even more complicated when you, as a Christian parent, begin to introduce your child to the real person of Jesus Christ. This should be an exciting and joyful truth to share with your little one as you begin the process of rearing your child under the instruction of God’s word, but it can oftentimes be a difficult education if Jesus has to compete with Santa Claus, Superman, or Harry Potter as the object of your child’s fledgling hero-worship.

Recent research has proven this confusion among children to be a real issue. Case in point, a 2014 research study at Boston University where it was discovered that young children with a religious background were less able to distinguish between fantasy and reality compared with their secular counterparts:

In two studies, 66 kindergarten-age children were presented with three types of stories: realistic, religious and fantastical. The researchers then queried the children on whether they thought the main character in the story was real or fictional.

While nearly all children found the figures in the realistic narratives to be real, secular and religious children were split on religious stories. Children with a religious upbringing tended to view the protagonists in religious stories as real, whereas children from non-religious households saw them as fictional.

Although this might be unsurprising, secular and religious children also differed in their interpretation of fantasy narratives where there was a supernatural or magical storyline.

“Secular children were more likely than religious children to judge the protagonist in such fantastical stories to be fictional,” wrote the researchers. “The results suggest that exposure to religious ideas has a powerful impact on children’s differentiation between reality and fiction, not just for religious stories but also for fantastical stories.”

– BBC News, Study: Religious Children Are Less Able To Distinguish Fantasy From Reality

The researchers concluded (as most college researchers are prone to do) that exposure to a religious education is probably the main culprit in a child’s difficulty in identifying fact from fiction. This conclusion, however, seems to indicate an anti-biblical bias that completely ignores the alternative possibility. Why is religion the problem? Isn’t it just as plausible that fictional stories involving magic are the real cause of confusion, especially when these fanciful tales, like Pharoah’s magicians, are the ones mimicking God’s miracles in the Bible?

In light of Scripture, this alternative conclusion is clearly confirmed. For starters, God is not a God of confusion. God’s word will not return void, but will accomplish what He pleases and will prosper in that thing for which He sent it. Over and over again, the Bible confirms that scriptural instruction from the word of God is essential to a child’s proper upbringing. It keeps them far from folly, equips them for good works, and makes them wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus (Proverbs 22:15 / 2 Timothy 3:14-17).

The one thing that is likely to undermine this God-ordained training is when an unaware parent interjects inappropriate fantasy stories from movies and literature as a compatible resource for their child’s development. This misstep is compounded when the parent’s reason for doing this is not because Disney movies or similar entertainments have any legitimate educational value, but because they don’t want their children to miss out on what the popular culture has to offer, even if it contains unbiblical content. To be blunt, raising children with such an indiscriminate use of worldly influences is almost a cultural form of Moloch worship which the faithless Israelites succumbed to when they delivered their infant children over to paganism for the sake of their temporal prosperity (Psalm 106:34-39).

Think about the possible consequences. Should we really be surprised when little Suzy suddenly has trouble maintaining the reality of Jesus walking on water after watching Luke Skywalker use the Force to levitate himself? And what should Suzy’s parents do after this happens? Do they let Suzy try to figure it out for herself or do they attempt to adequately explain the unexplainable to a kindergartner? And does it really matter at this point?

Some may suggest (and rightly so) that we can’t always shield our children from the world’s influences and the confusion these things might engender. Surely this is part and parcel of the average childhood and will no longer be an issue once they grow older and gain the intellectual capacity and religious understanding to correctly divide fact from fiction or right from wrong.

This is a valid point, and yet not particularly the issue at hand. The concern is not so much in how such exposure might temporarily affect a child, but how it might impact the child later on and into adulthood. A childhood immersed in “make-believe” might well lead to a misguided adulthood that finds more “truth” in paganism or occultism than in the Bible. It might also lay the groundwork for the idea that God’s word is just another fairy tale of human invention. And eventually, these adults might find themselves falling into the ditch of full-blown skepticism or atheism.

This possibility, in fact, was recently explored in a research study titled, Make Believe Unmakes Belief?: Childhood Play Style and Adult Personality as Predictors of Religious Identity Change. Published in 2014, the study looked into the relationship between childhood imagination and religiosity, finding that people who intensely engaged in pretend play as children were more likely to change their religious identity later in life, with apostasy being the largest category. As reported by Merrill Miller:

“The study assessed the role of ‘pretend play’—creating and acting out imaginary scenarios in made-up worlds—in the childhoods of individuals… and found that individuals who did not change their religious or nonreligious identification were less likely to have engaged in pretend play. Converts and switchers, however, were more likely to have played pretend, and apostates were the most likely to have often engaged in pretend play.” – The Humanist, Are Nonbelievers More Imaginative? A New Study Suggests They Might Be

Why were children who actively pursued a fantasy world more likely to abandon their religious upbringing as adults?

“The study’s author, Christopher Burris speculated that the higher correlation for apostates is because of the shift from structure — common among religious institutions — to unstructured — that is found in pretend play. ‘The realm of the nonbeliever is much less structured than the realm of belief is,’ he explained. ‘People’s cognitive, intellectual and emotional needs are not met sufficiently by faith traditions, so they strike out on their own way.'” – Massarah Mikati, Deseret News

The Biblical Approach For Christian Parents

The Bible, of course, has already anticipated the possible spiritual fallout from cultivating a child’s wild imagination instead of grounding them in reality and the clear instruction of God’s revelation. The biblical remedy?

Train up a child in the way that he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it. – Proverbs 22:6

This is not to say that Christian parents shouldn’t encourage their child’s emerging creativity. But it should be grounded and fostered in reality. To truly instill an active and abiding love for God and neighbor, a child’s imagination must be connected to this real-life task and to exposing the child to those faithful people in their lives who emulate Christian duty in their various talents and occupations.

Even without the benefit of this biblical insight, Dr. Maria Montessori made the academic observation that reality was the key to a more profitable imagination:

“The true basis of the imagination is reality, and its perception is related to exactness of observation. It is necessary to prepare children to perceive the things in their environment exactly, in order to secure for them the material required by the imagination. Intelligence, reasoning, and distinguishing one thing from another prepares a cement for imaginative constructions… The fancy which exaggerates and invents coarsely does not put the child on the right road.” – Spontaneous Activity in Education p 254, Chapter IX

Don’t misunderstand this point. Pretend play is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is an activity meant to assist children in processing the real world around them. “For example, if they see an excavator at work in the street,” writes one teacher, “they may then be attracted to working with a model of an excavator, to reading books about construction vehicles and to play based on this. This is a child’s imagination at work.”

The fact is, even children themselves would much rather engage with real-life activities when possible. Many educators are well aware that a child is much more excited by helping Mom or Dad prepare a meal in the kitchen than pretend-cook with a toy stove. And Scripture finds great wisdom in this approach. Notice how God instructs His people to teach their children in the course of their daily activities:

You shall teach [the words of God] diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise. – Deuteronomy 6:7

Here we see no significant time set aside for daydreaming or chasing after empty phantasms. This is an all-encompassing lifestyle that weaves God’s truth into one’s daily labor from dawn to dusk, and from childhood to adulthood. It is the command from Genesis and throughout the Bible to bear fruit in every good work and increase in the knowledge of God (Colossians 1:10) “until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ” (Ephesians 4:13).

Brothers, do not be children in your thinking. Be infants in evil, but in your thinking be mature. – 1 Corinthians 14:20

The Mature Approach For All Christians

Where is this maturity of which Paul speaks? Truly, one of the problems with American Christianity today is that too many professing believers have failed to see the importance of sobriety and maturity as a biblical imperative for discipleship. They twist the meaning of Luke 18:16-17 and simply refuse to grow up. They see their childlike fascination with games, fairy tales, and the playthings of their youth as a crowning virtue instead of a possible impediment to spiritual growth. In turn, these parents immerse their children in the same enthrallments and find great satisfaction in molding little ones into their own image, forgetting that the Bible instructs them otherwise.

On the contrary, God is the only object of wonder we need to focus on:

We will not hide them from their children, but tell to the coming generation the glorious deeds of the Lord, and his might, and the wonders that he has done. – Psalm 78:4

I ask you: How could anyone fully submit to this sacred task if Jesus is only viewed as a mythological “archetype of Christ” or a good teacher who said wise things but never really existed except in our collective unconscious?

Any confusion about the reality of the Son of God is never going to serve this dark world, especially in an age where fantasy is actively usurping real life. As Christians, we have a holy calling to go into the world to make disciples, not to go into a fantasy-land to do so. God’s word and the Holy Spirit have shown us the only mind-altering vision we need to ignite our passion. We need to humbly submit to our Lord’s charge to deny self, follow Him, and stay true to our Gospel witness and testimony for the sake of the lost.

We know, of course, that shielding people, young or old, from the counterfeit fictions of this world won’t guarantee their eventual conversion. Ultimately, it is only by God’s grace and power that hearts are changed and the lost through faith are saved. Yet, we also know that if salvation does come to an individual, it won’t be because of fairy tales or myths, but despite them. Our job as Christians is to stay on point with the pure Gospel message, and not capitulate in any way to the world’s insatiable desire for an alternate reality. To give in to that desire does nothing more than bring confusion and cast doubt on the existence of the living Savior and the faith that brings eternal life.

The next time Alexa, or anyone else, dares to tell you that Jesus is a fictional character, ask them what the Bible says about Him. Why? Because the biblical answer to that question is the only response that truly holds the power of the Gospel to heal the brokenhearted, preach deliverance to the captives, recover the sight of the blind, and set at liberty them that are bruised (Luke 4:18).

“Whom do you say I am?” – Jesus Christ, Matthew 16:15

cassandra #racist joystiq.com

why are there not alot of hispanics? simple nobody likes u, i dont care how many of u guys are here "illegally to boot" ur not making it easy to like u, protesting on the streets like idiots when u shouldnt be here in the first place, dumbest in class, waving stupid mexican flags...

who the fuck can take that bull shit? blasting ranchero music... yeah we dont want mexicans in our games, ur culture isn't cool like the japanese. so stfu. and go gang bang or something

Nicholas Powers #racist archive.fo

Seeing Poor White People Makes Me Happy

“Should I kick him in the face? Hard? No, chill, he’s not worth it. But why is this white boy begging for money in a Black neighborhood? Is he stupid?”

The homeless white boy flaps down like a dirty migratory bird, makes himself a nest from garbage and sleeps on the sidewalk. A sign on his shopping cart asks for money—I never give. I should tho ‘cause he makes me feel good.

White people begging us for food feels like justice. It feels like Afro-Futurism after America falls. It feels like a Black Nationalist wet dream. It has the feels I rarely feel, a hunger for historical vengeance satisfied so well I rub my belly.

I have the ghost of Martin Luther King Jr. in my head like a life coach exhorting me to “be my best self,” “show compassion to those who spite you,” “turn the other cheek” and “don’t give our enemies more reasons to hate us.” I need to kick Martin Luther King Jr. out of my head. Go fuck another secretary Martin! I need to ask what this white homeless boy means to me.

White homeless poor in the ‘hood are a Rorschach test. I see in them the history of colonization, slavery and mass incarceration that makes their begging Black people for money ironic—if not insulting. You wasted your whiteness! Why should we give to you? {snip}

It is the trick of internalized racism that Black anger is transformed into showy altruism to show the “white gaze” that we’re safe—good Negroes. So we aren’t attacked by more powerful whites—instead rewarded by them.

Sometimes folks see that same history and want to get even. I saw three brothers run up and spit on him as people cackled at the white boy who wiped sticky gobs from his eyelids. The laughter was cruel, joyful and belly deep. They might as well shook slave chains in his face and said, “Now you get to wear these nigga!”

But when a white person begs, maybe a white woman breastfeeding or a young white boy whining like a broken flute, I feel better. Good. It’s not just us. I feel happy. I feel like the scales of justice could shift.

The other day I jogged up the subway stairs and saw the homeless white boy again. “Can you get me something to eat,” he barked out to the river of people passing by. “Someone stole all my shit!” Scabs covered his mouth. He was sunburnt and thin. I ignored him but thought “Baby, you stole all mine.” I glanced at his blanket, shopping cart and books. Who is he? Why is he here? Where are his people?

I stopped myself. It’s the Martin Luther King Jr. life-coach again, saying, “Love your enemies! Get to know them as people.” No Dr. King! Today I own my anger. I want to snatch his food and say, “Go beg in a white neighborhood!” And eat it. And rub my belly. And laugh.

As I walk away, a white man in tailored clothes and exfoliated skin talked to the homeless white boy. His face is a mix of fear and disgust, race loyalty and pity. He’s doing what I did, confronting history.

How do I know? The fear in his tight mouth is disgust. The fear in his eyes is forced and unwanted racial empathy. He’s worried, like many whites are, that as they become the minority, fewer and fewer places will exist where they have power. They worry that at some point the roles will be reversed and they will have to beg for food. He looked at the homeless white boy and saw a hungry ghost, seemingly expelled from some alternate dimension where Europeans are enslaved, segregated and mass incarcerated. He sees the fall of America.