Similar posts

Elizabeth Minkel #sexist medium.com

Mary Sue
From self-inserts to imagines, how young women write themselves into the narrative
Illustration by the incredible Maia Kobabe

[This piece was written in conjunction with the most recent episode of the Fansplaining podcast. Follow us on Twitter or Tumblr, and if you’re interested in supporting our work—helping us commission more art and pieces like this—please consider donating to our Patreon.]

1.

Let’s start with the woman in question. She isn’t usually called Mary Sue—she has a less plausible, more fanciful name. Similarly, she has less plausible, more fanciful physical features than your average girl: purple eyes, or really extraordinary hair. You don’t know her, but you know the characters that surround her—she’s a new student at Hogwarts, an important ally you meet in Rivendell, the person on whom Holmes and Watson will rely to crack the case. She is notably smarter, stronger, and/or more beautiful than her peers. She’s going to save the day—and maybe a character you know will fall in love with her, too. She’s a wholly original character, though she might resemble an idealized version of the author. She’s a super-girl, bending beloved stories around her, heroism in a world mostly made up of heroes.

Oh, also: she is the ultimate object of scorn. She is the literal worst. She is embarrassing, self-indulgent trash; she ruins the story with her competence, her desirability, and the way all those characters you love seem to love her. She’s been described an endless number of colorful ways, including (via Fanlore’s meticulous and depressing entry on Mary Sues) the “literary equivalent of publicly soiling yourself.” She is everything that’s wrong with fanfiction, with girls writing stories, with fangirls, period.

The most basic definition of “Mary Sue” is an original female character in fanfiction—which is largely about established characters and worlds—who is often close to perfect. Like, too perfect. Very good at her job, very desirable romantically or sexually, and sometimes very emotionally moving when she dies, tragically, and the other characters mourn her. The story usually centers around her, often warping established characterization in the process. She’s self-indulgent, to be sure, but she’s harmless, and framed this way, one might wonder why young girls writing themselves into their favorite worlds is the literary equivalent of publicly soiling yourself. If you have to wonder that, though, you might not be familiar with the way the world treats young girls.

“Mary Sue” was coined by Paula Smith in 1970s Star Trek fandom, in a very short story that began, “‘Gee, golly gosh, gloriosky,’ thought Mary Sue as she stepped on the bridge of the Enterprise. ‘Here I am, the youngest lieutenant in the Fleet—only 15–1/2 years old.’” Lieutenant Mary Sue, object of affection of Kirk, Spock, and the rest of the men of Star Trek: TOS, was meant to be a parody of what Smith had observed in the fanzines of the day: “The term caught on because she’s very identifiable: Here it is, that same character, and isn’t it a shame because she’s just so tiresome,” she told an interviewer at Transformative Works and Cultures in 2011.

The conversation, conducted 40 years after Lieutenant Mary Sue first stepped onto the bridge, is an interesting one, not least because of the vague sense of disconnect between the literary analysis around the term (why bending a story around your original character might make for bad fiction, or at least not-terribly-enjoyable fiction if you aren’t the author) and the gendered morass that the term has sunk into (or, arguably, where it began).

Mary Sues weren’t born in Trek fandom—one researcher drew parallels between modern self-insert fic and stories that girls wrote about versions of themselves in the nineteenth century—but the term was born in an era of paper zines, a time of limited space for fanfiction, and arguably one with a different relationship between fic writers and their readers. When she first coined the term, Smith says, “In the letter columns, we started seeing the writers react: ‘What’s so wrong with my story? I’m just telling a story that I think is great.’” Even detractors admit Mary Sues are about young girls finding their power and agency in a world of fictional landscapes that rarely afford such journeys to women. After all, the original Mary Sue was the youngest lieutenant in the Fleet.

The days of limited space and resources in fic production are ancient history: there is always room for another story in the internet’s archives, and the general ethos of the broader fanfiction community has long been “don’t like, don’t read.” Many stories are self-indulgent, whether they feature a stand-in for the author or or not. But hatred of Mary Sues is embedded in the culture, self-perpetuating, and has seemingly ramped up since fic came online. In the early digital days, some archives banned Mary Sues outright; to this day, blogs exist solely to call peoples’ original characters Mary Sues, and to deconstruct and mock them accordingly.

Once the seed was planted in cultural discourse, Mary Sue accusations became impossible to stop—the toxicity surrounding the term has spread far beyond fanfiction self-inserts. Not long after it was coined, “Mary Sue” became any original female character in fanfiction; for decades, women have been reporting that they stopped writing original female characters, then female characters altogether, for fear of the “Mary Sue” label. Canonical female characters seen as threats to male/male romances in fic got the term, too—one notable (and incredibly troubling) example is the treatment of Nyota Uhura in fic about the rebooted Star Trek films. And over the years, the term has seeped across pop culture, to the point where “Mary Sue” becomes any female lead, anywhere. Bella Swan, Katniss Everdeen, and Rey from Star Wars are just a few slapped with the label. It’s just so annoying that their respective plots center around them, they must be Mary Sues.

(There are male Mary Sues, in case you’re wondering: “Marty Stu,” “Gary Stu,” and other variations have shown up over the years. People try to counter, even undercut, the inherent misogyny in the Mary Sue conversation by naming too-competent, too-desirable leading men—Captain Kirk, Luke Skywalker, and James Bond are famous examples. There’s an old joke: “What do you call a male Mary Sue?” The answer? “A protagonist.” It’s…not a particularly funny joke.)

But just as fanfiction writers are fighting back against historical scorn towards the practice at large, in recent years fans have been standing up for Mary Sues, too. Critics of the term are working to excise it from discussions around professional works, where it disproportionally targets women writing novels about female characters. In an act of reclamation, one of the most popular female-led geek sites on the internet took the term for its name. And within fan writing communities, people are going to bat for even the most self-indulgent Mary Sues, questioning why we shame young fans for making themselves the heroes of their own stories. But is a long-embedded stigma that easy to shake?

2.

It feels like every other fanfiction writer you talk to has a tale of their own early Mary Sues. Not everyone got called out for them—plenty of people learned to self-censor when they saw others getting shamed. My podcast partner, Flourish, reports that her early original female character was a student who proved vital to a case that Mulder and Scully were investigating. My first fanfic was almost entirely original characters, sketched out on yellow legal pads—I took a minor character from a book series and gave him a diverse team of corporate executives (don’t ask, it’s a weirdly long explanation). But by age 14, when I fell in love with Buffy and learned about online fandom, I was writing stories featuring a banshee who was old friends with Rupert Giles named…Ophelia. (I swear to God, I had no idea about the implications at the time, I just thought “Ophelia” sounded pretty, just as I loved “Cecilia” until Simon & Garfunkel ruined it for me.)

But these days more women are pushing back against the original characters they once felt ashamed of. After all, why shouldn’t young girls write the most spectacular versions of themselves—and why shouldn’t they want to see themselves in a story? In recent years I’ve been especially interested in watching women, people of color, and queer people reclaim the self-insertion narrative from one of indulgence to one of vital representation. In a piece partly about her youthful love of Lord of the Rings, Ash Davis writes,

“Be the change you wish to see,” Gandhi said (sorta). So I wrote my change. I discovered fanfiction and wrote all the damn change. I went into the painfully white fandoms of the things I loved…and wrote black folk into every last one of them. If there were no black people, I made them. If they were tokens, I made them stars. Mary-sued the shit out of everything. It didn’t matter, you were gonna see me!

In another piece I love about reclaiming the Mary Sue (via a medieval mystic, Margery Kempe, who essentially Mary Sued her way into the Bible in her writing, chilling with Mary and romancing Jesus), Ana Wilson writes about placing the female body back into reading—and into writing.

Reading The Book of Margery Kempe alongside fanfiction makes it clear that physical, imaginative reading is still associated with women, still considered embarrassing, and still employed as a form of resistance to mainstream narratives. People, in short, are still using this style of reading to elbow their way into texts from which they are restricted, just as Kempe and other women did with religious texts.

I wish I had my own Mary Sues to claim, but on a personal level, I’m a little more ambivalent. When I talk about good old Ophelia the Banshee, both “female” and an “original character” (and pulling from a very specific strand of symbolic mythology, for that matter), it’s easy to assume that I must have been writing a Mary Sue. But I can’t remember any specific connection between myself and the character, beyond the connections I have with every character I write, from the weary narrator of much of my original fiction who, like me, works at a racetrack, all the way to a certain pansexual immortal time traveling man from the 51st century.

The relationship between a writer and the characters she both reads and writes is a varied and complicated one. Fanfiction adds a layer onto that—the original characters in question aside, most of the people we write about started out as someone else’s characters, at least before the original work went out in the world. In the hands of fans, individually or collectively, a character often becomes someone else in the process. I should clarify: I don’t mean that fans are likely to render them out-of-character. But with the space and care that fanfiction can afford, fan writers often draw a favorite world’s characters as richer, more complicated—more human.

So unless you’re writing self-inserts or original characters, fanfic is partly about getting into the headspace of a character you didn’t create. That, for me anyway, is one of fanfiction’s chief pleasures—I’ve written before that for most fans, fic isn’t about wacky plots, as people outside fandom often assume, but about understanding a character so well that the interesting part comes when you stick them in a wacky plot (sure, “there’s only one hotel room left” counts as wacky), apply pressure, and see how they react.

For me, in my post-Ophelia Banshee days, inhabiting other characters as I write fanfiction has been vitally important. I read and write fic for a simultaneous distance and closeness with these characters—I allow them into my head, but I’m not looking to project myself back onto them. Part of this is privilege: whiteness, and I’m especially thinking of the un-interrogated whiteness of my adolescence, often lets white people assume a “default” position. A disproportionate number of the characters on our pages and screens are white, and from that lens shared whiteness with characters feels less like commonality and more like a lack of difference. Part of it is the opposite of privilege: the minefield of my struggles with gender and sexuality—almost definitely a subject for a totally separate essay—have left me perpetually out of step with many characters I encounter on pages and screens. When I think about myself in relation to a story, I slip away—a bit ironic, I suppose, for someone fascinated by girls who write themselves into stories. Or maybe that’s the whole point.

But part of it’s not just me: I hesitate to get too reductive on the links between shaming girls out of their own stories and the kinds of things that dominate many corners of the fanfiction world, but one could draw a line from the embarrassment of the Mary Sue to the positioning of certain types of characters in fandom as “default.” In the vast landscape of popular media, at least in the Anglo-American context, we’re implicitly taught to view the white male character as neutral, blank, infinitely relatable. While media certainly can shoulder some blame, fans should be held responsible, too, and the way young fans are encouraged, gently or mockingly, to step out of their own perspectives, away from their own backgrounds, and into the perspective of certain types of characters is one of the lasting legacies of the Mary Sue construction.

3.

When we consider the Mary Sue and her position in fandom at large, those of us outside the real person fic space often tend to overlook the fact that as long as celebrity fandom has existed, fannish communities have been built on self-insert fic with female protagonists. For many readers, this kind of story is sought after, not an object of scorn. The self-inserts that populate a lot of boy band RPF, for example, are perspective characters that, just like Mary Sues, allow young women to gain narrative control of their relationships with the objects of their affection.

Perspective is important in fanfic. It’s obviously also important in all other fiction, ever, but fic can sometimes feel particularly preoccupied with it. After all, perspective shift is one of the bedrocks of the practice; fans love nudging the spotlight off a canonical protagonist. RPF is an interesting space to examine perspective, and the way the “default” (white, male) gaze gets shattered and refashioned. There’s the complicated sort of circular gaze of stories from the celebrity’s point of view, where the reader watches the celebrity watching a character who’s often a stand-in for the reader. And while second-person fic feels more prevalent in fanfiction at large than it does in the published fiction world, it often feels ubiquitous in RPF spaces. Lumped under a second-person umbrella stories that work very differently in form and function, from fleshed-out second person narrators to “x Reader” stories that eschew identifying details to “imagines,” short prompts that exist in a murky space between fiction and daydream fodder.

When you place those fleshed-out narrators side-by-side with Mary Sues, it’s an interesting study in contrasts: where a Mary Sue is too-perfect, the self-insert narrator is often fairly ordinary, beaten down in some way, frustrated with her situation, not quite aware of her own attractiveness or agency. (Part of the pleasure of the narrative arc is the realization, and reclamation of that agency.) These characters and this type of fic is wildly popular on Wattpad, so much so that the platform commissioned an entire anthology of second-person RPF entitled IMAGINES, released last year with a shiny silver mirror on its cover alongside the words “Celebrity encounters starring YOU.”

The imagines of the anthology are, a little confusingly, not quite the same thing as “imagines,” the prompts that are increasingly popular on Tumblr and Wattpad. The anthology’s stories, about chance encounters with celebrities, are narrated by women of various ages and backgrounds with clear characterization and perspective. They’re not all romantic: in one story, a mother embarrasses her teenage daughter when she brings home Nicholas Hoult for dinner, the “you” full of maternal affection for the actor; in another, “you” are on the run with Kim Kardashian, a freedom fighter in an America where the government has outlawed selfies (Kim is on the run because she keeps taking them, obviously). The “yous” are unremarkable, but there’s a bit of knowing space between the reader and the narrator: we can tell you’re selling yourself short, and we’re waiting for you to realize it.

Actual imagines, in contrast, leave you to do most of the work of constructing a protagonist. They are short, sometimes a single sentence: “Imagine: You and Ed take a camping trip to get away from the media,” reads one on a popular Tumblr devoted to imagines, accompanied by a gif of Ed Sheeran looking sort of bashful. How you met, the state of your relationship, literally everything about “you” is up in the air—whether the reader even feels compelled to fill those gaps is a matter of preference. The “you” in an imagine isn’t necessarily average-looking or untalented—the same blog offers you a gif of Sebastian Stan looking charmed accompanied by, “Imagine: When Sebastian first meets you he is speechless and stunned by your beauty.” Imagines are interesting often not because of what they contain, but what they lack—the wide-open spaces they leave, utterly customizable, whether you spin a single-sentence prompt into a 60,000-word story or just imagine you and Ed Sheeran sitting in a tent. As a self-insert narrator, you are as present or as absent as you want.

The protagonists of “x Reader” stories are similarly blank: often called “y/n,” short for “your name,” these stories are the most literal expression of “self-insert” imaginable, since the pairing is you, the reader, and the celebrity of the title. These stories vary, but sometimes they tread so lightly in an attempt to leave “y/n” as neutral as possible that they wind up feeling a bit like Mad Libs, instructing you to fill in, say, your favorite book rather than just name one the narrator might like. Sometimes x Reader stories follow a full narrative arc; other times they feel like a collected set of imagines. When I got sucked in researching, I wound up in a story where in each chapter, you successively date, then marry, each of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

The prevalence and growing popularity of images and x Reader stories amongst younger fans is a fascinating shift when I think of the self-inserts of previous generations. If a Mary Sue is a projection, a young woman’s ideal self on the page, then an imagine is more likely to be a reflection: exactly who you are, at the center of the story. Mary Sues are aspirational, but in a way, so are these other self-insert forms: they construct worlds in which your fictional self, going about your incredibly ordinary life, is just as important as Lieutenant Mary Sue. The story still bends around you.

The overwhelming popularity of self-inserts on Wattpad, a fanfiction hub with a younger demographic than other archives, leaves me both curious and hopeful about young girls right now, writing themselves into stories. I know that reader x boy-band-star-of-the-moment isn’t exactly a new construction; while I was working on my weird diverse corporate team and Flourish was helping the FBI catch aliens, my contemporaries were writing themselves into Hanson’s green room and *NSYNC’s tour bus, stories they’d later disavow (and, haltingly, reclaim).

Today’s social media is restructuring our conceptions of personal identity—we increasingly center ourselves in our own narratives. Don’t worry, I’m not about to go on some “narcissistic millennial” rant. Quite the opposite: it’s heartening to see young women, young queer people, young people of color, center themselves in narratives when our screens and pages are still lacking. In the fanfiction world, just like in the rest of the world, we still hold marginalized characters, original or otherwise, to impossible standards. But perhaps our embrace of Mary Sues—even if they’re the most achingly perfect young woman to ever command a ship in the Fleet—will help change things for the better.

Paul M. Dohse #wingnut paulspassingthoughts.com

Let’s talk about root causes. All political victories start with your base being united and activated. The Democrat party is girded by leftist ideology; without leftist support, the party will collapse. Now, what is the crux of leftism? It’s self-esteem built on being better than others. It’s self-esteem and self-worth based on how many people worship you because you have what they don’t. People in general don’t realize there is a minority of people in the world seeking to be gods in their own right. As much as I like movies, movie stars have a god complex. Obviously. As much as I like many musicians, most have a god complex. As much as I like sports, many have a god complex. Journalists think they are the gatekeepers of truth and justice; that is, according to their own version.

And politicians primarily protect their right to godhood. There is a reason most musicians are politically left. There is a reason most athletes are politically left. There is a reason why most movie stars are politically left. There is a reason why movie stars are called before congress as expert witnesses on a variety of social issues which on its face makes no sense at all. They can act, or sing, and that makes them an expert on climate change?

And regardless of what seems to be the case, you never criticize God because any criticism of God must be based on a misunderstanding because our universal presupposition is that God is love and perfection. I agree with that; but such is hardly true of the press. We must ask ourselves why Trump’s “fake news” mantra is deemed sacrilegious by journalist icons like Chris Wallace despite overt and incessant misrepresentations of truth by the press. Obviously, the press deems itself above being questioned; to do so is a violation of the First Amendment via debate and contrary ideas which has never had anything to do with free speech. The opposite is true.

The essense of sin is a desire to control others. Sin is the basis for caste systems that dominate the world. Another angle on this is self-worth based on comparing yourself to others rather than being the best YOU that you can be.

Please note: leftist ideolgy is predicated on others being less. Self-worth is predicated on where you are located on the caste social ladder. Individualism makes all of that irrelevant. Individualism seeks its purpose in self-assessment that is true, earned, honorable, and pleasing to God; leftist ideology is predicated on being worshiped. It is predicated on being a legend in your own mind. The shortcut to all of that is being a victim; self-pity is not only self-worship, but a way to get worship from others on the cheap.

Trump, as an individualist, has committed the unpardonable sin. He is actually working to enable the little people to be the best they can be. In contrast, according to leftist ideology, the little people are preordained to worship the elite. And the best way to injure an individualist is to destroy his or hers legacy. “You didn’t build that.” Individualists want to be remembered by their truthful accomplishments and the example they set for others after them. They are purpose-driven.

The Democrats must satisfy their base, and we now know why their base was rabid over Trump being impeached. Rather than stating numerous examples such as what the actor Rob Reiner tweeted, I will give the thumbnail:

“Donald Trump will forever be known as the only third President in American history to be impeached.”

Bingo. That’s it; the goal was to inflict the ultimate injury. A political cartoon also shows Trump at the cleaners with mud on his suit labeled, “impeachment” and the clerk telling him, “that isn’t going to come out.” Again, bingo. My reply to the cartoon which appeared on Twitter follows:

“And that was the whole point of why they did it knowing that the stigma of impeachment is WHAT [impeachment, period, the big “P”] and not WHY especially in a low information society. They were going to find a reason to impeach him and when you have the majority it can be for eating a ham sandwich. Sad. Petty. Evil.”

The tweet was pulled down shortly thereafter and I am unable to find the cartoon.

This isn’t about Trump at all: he’s just the lightening rod for the whole issue; the collective rise of individuals leads to elitism and their lust for godhood being diminished. Individualism is the primary nemesis of caste.

And caste must confiscate every pursuit of individual liberty and happiness and demand that it be burned on its alter as a living sacrifice. And at some point, we the people must question our funding of these religions for our own entertainment.

While we celebrate their gifts, what they really want is the surrender of our right to exist other than what our existence contributes to their worship…which is our reasonable service in their eyes.

usachinanukewar #fundie usachinanukewar.wordpress.com

The Anglo-Saxons founded the Anglo-Saxon Empire, but the Rothschilds control the Empire. The Jews is the king. The Anglo-Saxons are slaves.

The Anglo-Saxons founded the Anglo-Saxon Empire, but the Rothschilds control the Empire. The Jews is the king. The Anglo-Saxons are slaves. And, the Rothschilds is simply a tool for Lord Jesus Christ to slaughter the ungodly people on the earth, the Rothschilds’ depopulation scheme achieved and done at WW3, World War 3, mainly China and USA engaging at all-out nuke war fought by thousands of nukes, wiping out one-fourths of the world population by war, famine, plagues and wild animals.

And, at the end of the End Times, the 7-year Tribulation, Lord Jesus is going to kill the head of the Rothschilds, the Antichrist, and cast down him into the Lake of Fire, being burned and tormented for eternity.

So, my conclusion, who is the most horrifying One? The One Who can kill the Antichrist. Lord Jesus Christ is God, Creator, Emperor, and Judge.

Since that day, there was one day, Lord Jesus Christ transmitted His message into my mind, telling me to go googling for “Rothschild”, and then I did. You know what? Since that very day, my whole world shattered and my whole world has been shattering even more deeply and deeply. The Antichrist is so truly existing on the planet earth, and the Book of Revelation is not a fairy tale that I once thought when I was a high school kid in California. And, Mr. Rothschild simply names me a very cute little nickname, but I really don’t like it, my new nickname, Peter the Screaming and Horrified and Hair-Raising with Dark, Spider-Web Wrinkles Covering Around Panda’s Eyes. I have been horrified since then and I don’t sleep well. It is all because of Mr. Rothschild.

My eyes turn panda’s eyes, dark and ugly, for I don’t sleep well sometimes.

Mr. Rothschild, that most evil bad big wolf, simply shatters my whole world. All shattered. The only thing I have now is my Lord Jesus Christ, my Father and Emperor, who can rescue me out of Mr. Rothschild’s evil and dirty hand.

Fading Light #racist stormfront.org

(emphasis mine)

White Nationalism isn't for pussies. That's why I get so flipping irritated when some libtard--who has temporarily wandered in to Stormfront because his Black drug dealer ripped him off and he's pissed--starts yammering about how we should modify our movement to appeal to Jews. I don't want to appeal to them. If even half of the vast sea of morons out there starting approving of White Nationalism, I'd know we had made a wrong turn somewhere and were now serving our enemies. If you have to rape your own children to earn the approval of a bunch of child molesters so you'll have enough allies to keep your children "safe," you've already failed them.

I've seen a lot of shocking things so far in my life--more than I care to write about here. My earliest childhood memory is of my mother's funeral. My entire family turned viciously against me when I renounced liberalism and I am (hopefully) permanently estranged from them. I realized very unpleasantly one day in high school that I was the only member of the group of girlfriends I ran around with who wasn't a disgusting slut or a man-hating dyke. If you think most people are basically good--or even fifty percent, or even ten percent, or even one percent--you have not been paying enough attention. So now you know why there are so few of us. Congratulations, you've just realized we won't win this war with a vote.

I've been on Stormfront long enough to watch people come in and decide that White Nationalism isn't worth the work if it hasn't restored our nations to Whites-only status after only six months. Then they snap to the other extreme or start talking about compromising with the devil to try to "save what they can." Let me clue you in: Compromising with the devil is how you lose. It is, in fact, the ONLY way you can lose.

In about half a century, I expect to be dead. It won't matter if we have our nations back or not; I will still die. What I have, then, is my principles, my commitment to the truth, my unwillingness to sell out to Satan for short-term gains. That being the case, I really don't care if the Jewbags successfully take control over every aspect of our lives and start stuffing us all into gas chambers as long as I don't surrender my principles. Naturally, of course, I would prefer that they be prevented from doing that, but I will not compromise with them when I know they are evil. As long as I'm dead either way, I would rather depart with my middle-finger sticking up at them and a big smile on my face. That's not because I'm convinced that there's a heaven and a hell, but because I am a creature of strong conscience, and I'm justified in seeing myself as being above them only as long as I don't act like they do. I cannot surrender my principles and retain my sense of self-worth at the same time.

Norse mythology is fascinating stuff. It conveys the perfect warrior spirit: In tale after tale, the good guy knows he is facing impossible odds and will definitely die, but fights as hard as he can anyway because his commitment to his duty is the measurement of self-worth, as it should be. It is the ultimate question of motivation: Are you doing this for a quick pay-off, or are you in this to the bone, win or lose, hell or high water? I love those stories because I want that to be me. I want to earn the approval of a warrior like that by showing my own resolve to see this through to my last breath. There are some ideals we simply cannot sacrifice and still be a culture worth saving.

And this is something our opponents can't understand at all: You can't demoralize me very effectively because I'm not in this for jollies. You can't buy me off because I'm not for sale. I will fight as hard as I can, as intelligently as I can, for as long as I can. Do the unexpected? Yes. Avoid getting myself martyred needlessly? Yes. Pick my battles to maximize my effectiveness? Yes. BUT there won't be any compromise with the devil. Whenever possible, I will slip around any snares they set to make them look like fools and laugh at their frustration with my maneuvers, but I will not sell out my conscience to keep from getting nailed to a cross. I will keep them guessing and wondering where I'll attack from next, but I will not stoop to using Jewish tactics in this war: I do not want an army of zombies on my side. I do not want to bribe politicians like our enemies do and steal what isn't ours like they do and lie to children like they do.

And yes, I do find myself sometimes wondering if a sorrowful dead-end is where all of this will ultimately take me. Is this a world where people of conscience are protected by doing the right thing, or is it just a matter of time until evil has me cornered because so many other people have "cut a deal" with it? I suppose I'm going to find out. In the meantime, I have a plan: Defiance of their will and refusal of their purchase offers, and a lot of enjoyment at their confusion because not a one of them was able to turn down the deal with the devil when it was offered to them.

Paul Elam #sexist archive.is

[From "The unspoken side of rape"]

Isn’t it more than just a little fascinating that underneath all this hoopla about rape is a whole lot of women who, when thinking about some guy pinning them down in a kitchen and forcing a hand up their blouse, generally tend to do so with their own hand or a vibrator between their legs? You don’t have to like it to know its true.

And isn’t it also interesting that the most rape obsessive morons on the planet also happen to be some of the ugliest morons on the planet?

Consider this. If rape awareness was a religion, Andrea Dworkin was The Fucking Pope. The 300+ lb. basilisk of man-hate had a face big enough and pockmarked enough to be used to fake a lunar landing. Her body was roughly the size and shape of a small sperm whale.

And she thought of little else in her life other than rape. The subject drove almost everything she said and did.

She even claimed to have been drugged and raped in 1999 in Paris, an accusation that was never proven and which came under a great deal of scrutiny, apparently for damned good reason.

C’mon people, Dworkin’s problem wasn’t that she was raped. Her problem, and I mean all along, was that she wasn’t.

Did I say she was the Pope of Rape Awareness? Let me take that back. She wasn’t the Pope, she was the Jimmy Swaggert. Like a corrupt televangelist who only shuts up about sexual purity and morality long enough to secure the services of a five dollar hooker, Dworkin was the poster child for “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”

Or, in other words, she was obsessed with rape, quite possibly even creating the illusion it happened to her, precisely because her worth on the sexual market was measured in pesos.

Dworkin wanted to be raped, which in her mind meant being sexually desired, but didn’t have the goods to make that happen so she made a career of hating both the source of her rejection, men, and the source of her competition, attractive women.

Go figure, her other pet peeve was porn.

It is much the same with the SlutWalks, those rapidly growing celebrations of stupidity and cellulite taking over the western landscape. Most of the women there may be dancing Dworkin, but money is on the idea that when not participating in the SlutWalks these girls are desperately trying to fuck their way into feeling attractive.

Attractive enough that a man would lose control of himself to have his way with them
.

[...]

The real lesson here is simple. The concept of rape has a lot of utility for women. One, it feeds their narcissistic need to feel irresistible. Two, if feeds their narcissistic need to feel irresistible. That level of irresistibility is the pinnacle of a woman’s sexual viability and worth. And for a whole lot of women, sexual worth is the only self-worth they know.

biblicalgenderroles #fundie biblicalgenderroles.com

The Government’s Definition of Abuse Vs The Bible’s Definition of Abuse

“Physical Abuse: Hitting, slapping, shoving, grabbing, pinching, biting, hair pulling, etc are types of physical abuse. This type of abuse also includes denying a partner medical care or forcing alcohol and/or drug use upon him or her.”

The first problem with this definition is that it completely negates any type of physical discipline which is commanded by God for children (Proverbs 23:13-14) and is also allowed by God for adults (Deuteronomy 25:1-3, Proverbs 19:29 and Proverbs 26:3). Under this definition of physical abuse spanking of one’s child or one’s wife would be consider abuse (See my article “Does the Bible Allow Wife Spanking” for more on that issue). A mother or father slapping their rebellious child even with an open palm (front handed) would be guilty of physical abuse under this definition.

I agreed in my previous article on abuse that things like shoving and punching have no place in the home not even as methods of discipline because they risk serious bodily injury or even death in violation of God’s law regarding limits on discipline (Exodus 21:26-27). I also agreed that things like biting, kicking and hair pulling have no place in the home as methods of discipline as it should be done in love and in control and not as brawl or a fight. But again overall the biggest problem with the government’s definition of physical abuse is that its definition negates physical discipline in the home which God allows.

“Sexual Abuse: Coercing or attempting to coerce any sexual contact or behavior without consent. Sexual abuse includes, but is certainly not limited to, marital rape, attacks on sexual parts of the body, forcing sex after physical violence has occurred, or treating one in a sexually demeaning manner.”

First we will address where this government definition of sexual abuse aligns with God’s moral law and that is regarding children. A parent has absolutely no right under God’s law to touch their child in a sexual way, to coerce them or force them to have sex. This is a violation of God’s moral laws regarding incest (Leviticus 18:6).

But really the heart of this definition is directed at husbands in regard to how they engage in sexual activity with their wives. And when applied to the husband/wife relationship this definition of sexual abuse for the most part nullifies God’s Word.

This government’s definition of sexual abuse as with physical abuse nullifies a husband’s God given sexual rights to his wife’s body in marriage. It also nullifies his right to discipline her for sexual refusal. The Bible says that sex is both a right and responsibility in marriage (Exodus 21:10-11, Proverbs 5:18-19, I Corinthians 7:3-4) and that the only thing that must be mutually agreed upon in the area of sex is when a couple will NOT have sex (I Corinthians 7:5) for a short time. See my articles on sexual refusal, sexual consent and forced sex in marriage for more on what the Bible says about these topics.

Emotional Abuse: Undermining an individual’s sense of self-worth and/or self-esteem is abusive. This may include, but is not limited to constant criticism, diminishing one’s abilities, name-calling, or damaging one’s relationship with his or her children.

While we need to be careful of how subjective this government definition of emotional abuse is I think for the most part it aligns with what the Scriptures say that we should generally be trying to build people up and not tear them down(Ephesians 4:29,James 3:8-10). See my article on “What Does the Bible Say About Abuse?” for more on the subject of emotional abuse.

Economic Abuse: Is defined as making or attempting to make an individual financially dependent by maintaining total control over financial resources, withholding one’s access to money, or forbidding one’s attendance at school or employment.

This government definition of “Economic Abuse” is a complete addition to God’s moral law and it also nullifies a husband’s rights toward his wife under God’s law. And again let’s not kid ourselves that they are speaking equally to husbands and wives. This is an attack on patriarchy and men having their wives being economically dependent on them.

The fact is this definition of Economic abuse is exactly the opposite of God’s moral law on this issue. In Exodus 21:10-11 we are told that if a man does not provide his wife with food and clothing she may be free of him (divorced from him). God considers it economic abuse when a man forces his wife to economically independent of him, not when he forces his wife to be economically dependent on him.

And yes husbands under God’s law can absolutely forbid their wives from going to college or seeking careers as wives are to be subject their husbands in EVERYTHING as the Church submits to Christ in everything (Ephesians 5:24).

Also as far as household finances go – whether a husband allows his wife to work or not all the financial decision making comes under his direction. If he wants to take away his wife’s ATM card he can do that under God’s law.

Psychological Abuse: Elements of psychological abuse include – but are not limited to – causing fear by intimidation; threatening physical harm to self, partner, children, or partner’s family or friends; destruction of pets and property; and forcing isolation from family, friends, or school and/or work.

If read in a certain way, the government’s definition of psychological abuse may actually align with the Scriptures. God does forbid the use of threatening (Ephesians 6:9). If a husband or wife threatens to kill themselves or their children or pets or to destroy property if they don’t get what they want that is the very definition of threatening behavior which is condemned by the Word of God.

However a warning from an authority toward one under them of the consequences of their actions is not engaging in threatening or psychological abuse. If I isolate my teen son from friends that are bad influences on him is that psychological abuse? The answer is no. It all depends on my motivation. Is my intent simply to exert my power over him or is it actually for his own good? If it is the latter there is nothing immoral about this from a Biblical perspective.

Many people would agree that the example I gave is not immoral. But what if I replaced my son in that example with my wife? OH NO – that is completely different right? Why? Because she is an adult? The Bible however makes no such distinction when it comes to the discipline of wives and children. If my wife was talking to or hanging out with other women who were bad spiritual influences on her affecting her morals, relationship with God or with me I have absolutely ever right before God as her spiritual authority to restrict her access to those women.

The Bible teaches a clear social order – the husband, an adult male, is the head of the wife, an adult female and children are under the authority of their parents(Ephesians 5:23-24, Ephesians 6:1-3).

And for all you feminists out there the practice of a husband exercising his spiritual authority over his wife in these ways does not infantilize her or make her equal with her children. God has granted a wife and mother more rights than he has her children. She has sexual rights to her husbands body and she is given the position of manager of the home and of the children which are sacred and honored roles. She of course exercises these positions under the authority of her husband but by no means does the Bible make wives and children equals with another.

So when we throw out the straw-man argument that a husband exercising control over his wife infantilizes her we come to the real heart of the issue. Feminists don’t like the fact that while God gives women more rights than children he does not give women equal rights with men. In other words, its not about women be treated as children but its about women be treated as women. Feminists want women treated as men.

tatoff #sexist reddit.com

We all share a common value: We hate that the meritocracy is a farce.

It's no secret that people get along when their value systems align. While at the surface level all the posts here are memes about being subhuman they can all be reduced to one common thread: There is no such thing as a real-world meritocracy.

In the dating world it's not about personality; it's about looks. In the work world it's not about what you know; it's about who you know. You get the idea.

Look no further than the 'advice' we're always given: 'just try harder', 'just have a better personality', 'just improve yourself'. These are all predicated on the belief that if you put the effort in, you will reap the appropriate reward. We all know that's not true - that line of thinking even has it's own fallacious cognitive bias: The just-world fallacy.

So why do others fervently preach and defend this flawed line of thinking? I believe it's just a selfish desire to take credit for their own success. Since they lucked into their success they subconsciously need to convince themselves that they deserve it. They will claim they're a 'good person' who has 'worked hard' for what they have.

In order to complete this flawed narrative they need to perform additional mental gymnastics to explain why others have failed:

'They must be shitty people.'

'They must not try.'

'If they tried as hard as I did and was a good as I am they'd be fine it's not even hard.'

The judgmental outsider on this sub is nothing more than a delusional narcissist with a compulsive need to defend their own success by continuously lashing out at us failures.

Why us in particular? Because our directly-competing worldview is that their self-assuring 'meritocracy' is a complete sham. It's a subtext in our memes and our shitposts. It's the essence of the blackpill.

SchrodingersDick #sexist incels.co

The collapse of civilization is happening in your lifetime. Feminism caused it. There is no coming back from this. Long post.

Expanded upon another post of mine in another thread.. been meaning to post this for you all. I kinda suck at writing so it might be all over the place. There’s a TL;DR down below but I put a lot of effort into this so I’d appreciate if you took the time to read.

For the cucktears lurkers, before you shit on this, Take a step back and look at the world in the context of just another sexually dimorphic mammal species to understand the following.

Civilization is inherently a patriarchy. They are the same thing. One cannot exist without the other. In order for a civlization to exist, female sexual nature (hypergamous genetics-based mate selection) must be kept in check, for men to be treated equally and fairly, to allow for all members to have hope that if they contribute, they can be rewarded with guanrateed breeding right over a female of their choosing. In this sense, it is necessary for the success of a civilization that women be sexually oppressed.. this developed world is a man’s thing and will only ever cater to men. It is our creation for the benefit of all, but mostly genetically subpar, men. It’s all built at the expense of women’s vaginas. Any society in which women have free mate selection can not function. In tribal times, there was 1 sexually successful man for every 17 sexually successful women.. assuming a 100% female sexual success rate, that leaves 94% of men sexless. This is important. If it weren’t for this fact, we wouldn’t have a problem and this site wouldn’t exist. We need to replace genetic currency with something else in order to appease all men and make it possible for everyone to contribute and build something great.. Money was invented. Money must represent survival in order to be worth anything. It must replace the baseline definition of survival meaning a big strong male able to kill other males in a fight. Well we have a police force for that now so no need to worry. But most importantly, it must be able to be used as leverage to purchase pussy under the guise of survival. That’s the only way to keep the male population happy. Without it, women have to reason to mate with subpar men.. This system is inherently oppressive to women. Unfortunately for them, this system favors survival over reproductive success. Everyone survives and procreates but at the expense of females carrying and birthing inferior DNA. Survival is not enough for them. The idea of 1:1 male to female mate pairings guarantees that all the females not paired with a high SMV male with be with a low SMV male and produce genetically poor kids (which is why they are repulsed by low SMV men, which is why rape only exists with low SMV men, but you knew this already, no need to expand), something that disgusts them on a primitive level. It’s a system they need to get rid of.. hence the sexual liberation, fighting for rights, fighting for a right to work, etc. no matter how hard men try to keep a society strong and prosperous, women will actively try and tear it all down.

This snowball formed when women were given rights.. it started a snowball effect. Now there are several things that compounded with each other make for a nightmare scenario for the world.

1: women in the work place. Women earn their own money now. A Man’s resources cannot be used as leverage to purchase reproductive rights with a female. Thus his contributions to the tribe are meaningless as his reward holds no value.

2: genetic misrepresentation and contraception. Estrogen frauding Makeup, plastic surgeries, gym to build a high estrogen ass.. all these things are being used to falsely elevate women’s sexual dimorphism, perceived serum estrogen concentration, age, fertility, etc. notice how every foid does makeup the same way. Thin narrow nose bridge, shadows under the zygos to show zygo projection, rounded chin makeup, eyeliner to fraud thick eyelashes (health indicator).. women are walking around looking like top tier specimens the likes of which would make your caveman ancestors balls explode. Tbh they should bow down to partiarchy that they’re able to walk around like this alone and not immediately be gangraped when they step out of the house looking like they sweat pure estrogen and fertility. And lastly contraception.. things like birth control, condoms and abortion make casual sex and being a whore consequence-free. It’s the reason the cock carousel exists.

3: easy access to a global sexual market. The tribe is no longer a handful of guys and girls with the top guy doing all the fucking. Smartphones, Tinder, Instagram, cars, planes, buses, etc all help make the sexual marketplace a global thing.. in essence it’s an 8 billion member tribe, with easy access to all types of chad dick. Far more competition among males and a far lower sexual success rate among the male population.

4: destruction of religion. Religion isn’t really a thing anymore. It was once a powerful tool to convince women that 1:1 mate pairings are what’s to be expected, no sex before marriage, shit like that (had other reasons too. Keeps men’s testosterone at bay, thou shall not kill, steal, etc. keeps things civil) .. They had a reason to abide and ignore their primal instincts. It did a pretty good job.. now that’s gone, and there’s virtually no way of enforcing monogamy and chastity. Which funny enough, is also the only prerequisite for a woman to get married.. just be a virgin. They can’t even manage that yet a bunch of captain save a hoes are quick to wife em up, and these hoes will wear white on their wedding day symbolizing their purity.. jfl

Compound these 4 new phenomenon together, and you can quickly see that the sexual market is fucked, and a society with a SMP like this cannot sustain itself.. This is a world that belongs to women now. This world automatically excludes all men unfit for reproduction. In this case, it’s likely over 99% of men. What will these men do once they realize money doesn’t buy pussy? Once they realize that if there’s truly no hope for them, they can rely on government assistance, or work a menial bottom tier job just to make enough to survive. If these men even have the drive to go to work, they will have no drive to innovate, get promotions, invent something, become millionaires, etc. you’ll have a lot of complacent men with no motivation to contribute anything. Best hope automation can replace the entire workforce, and if not, then you got a work force made up of 99% women and just lmao if you think that’s gonna take us anywhere. Women have no incentive to make money other than to rid men of their only leverage and open up their prospective mating options. Same deal with them.. they’ll just aim to make the minimum amount to survive and genefraud enough to land 6’4” chad.

This results is a catalysmic shift of the world as we know it.. there will be a total collapse once the number of men who drop out of society reaches critical mass. But until then, you will see a shitload of people dependent on government assistance, the rich being taxed out the ass, who now have even less incentive to keep perusing high paying careers, more people coping with drugs/alcohol, a spike in suicides and mass shootings, high SMV men forming harems, etc.. basically 2018 x10.

For this to happen, It’s not even necessary for the masses to swallow the blackpill.. it’s only necessary for them to realize money doesn’t mean anything anymore. That’s all it takes. Put simply, one’s contributions to society are no longer worth the effort. It’s basically slave labor at that point.

So there you have it. All the causes are there and cannot be reversed.. things have already been set in motion. just wait till the effects of them become painfully obvious. This cannot be fixed since nobody is gonna accept that women’s vaginas are the reason for this. Maybe next time around men don’t fuck up and start the civilization off strong with commoditized pussy. This will all go down in documented history so a mistake like this likely won’t repeat itself. That’s the good news.

This should be lifefuel for you all. You are witnessing the collapse of the most successful civilization on earth in YOUR lifetime. Pretty cool. So ditch your ER plans, untie your ropes, and Sit back and watch the world burn.

TL;DR; a couple rights here and there and a few apps destroyed the world. Patriarchy, religion, and commoditization and sexual oppression of women are paramount to the existence and survival of any civilization. We lack all 4. It’s over. Bunker up and stockpile food and ammo. We’re going back to the jungle.

David J. Stewart #sexist #fundie #homophobia jesus-is-savior.com

Husbands and wives are commanded alike to submit one to the other. You don't hear this too often taught. Ephesians 5:21, “Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.” A Christian husband who loves his wife will want to make her happy and submit to her desires and wishes as much as possible. However, in any area of conflict, a wife is commanded to submit and obey her husband.

There are many evil women today, rebels and feminists at heart, who shout out “domestic violence” and “abuse” every time a preacher speaks on the subject of “submission.” I do not approve of abuse, and I never have. A wife who is being physically abused ought to leave. But I'm going to say this, some of you little witches who push your husband's buttons—sass him, disobey him, grieve him, hide the mail from him, lie to him, yell at him, and put him through hell-on-earth—you are in trouble with God for stirring him up.

1st Kings 21:25, “But there was none like unto Ahab, which did sell himself to work wickedness in the sight of the LORD, whom Jezebel his wife stirred up.”

Feminism teaches women to harbor a sinful spirit of resentment, teaching wives to walk around with a chip on their shoulder, being defensive and over-sensitive toward her husband; whereas the Word of God compels women to maintain a Christian spirit of power, love and a sound mind, teaching submission.

It all goes back to Eve in the Garden of Eden. Eve didn't like being restricted. She wanted to be as a god. Eve wanted to have a say in the way things were done. This is the very root and essence of feminism, that is, women want EQUALITY in the marriage, home, church and public. Feminists attempt to make the issue one of self-worth, but it is really a matter of authority. Women are equal in value and worth; but God has ordained that a man shall be the head of the marriage and home. Women are to keep silence in the church, having a meek and quiet spirit as the Bible teaches.

There is a world of difference between a woman who posses a feminist spirit, having an attitude toward authoritative husbands, fathers and preachers. They also have a problem with an authoritative God and Bible, which is why the new perverted NIV 2011 is transgendered, removing the words he, him and man in THOUSANDS of places to appease lesbians and feminists. To no surprise, the corrupted New International Version (NIV) 2011 removes the word obey from Hebrews 13:7. It is wickedness. We are living in an evil generation that wants to recreate God in their own sinful image (Romans 1:25).

A godly woman will have a submissive spirit at all times. She will despise feminism, understanding that it is rooted in the same rebellion that banned Adam and Eve form the Garden of Eden and brought sin and death upon the world (Romans 5:12). Feminism is the rot of any society, which is synonymous with abortion, pornography and lesbianism.

Oogabooga #sexist saidit.net

@GreenCappy

Inceldom is a cult. If you’re romantically / sexually desperate please read the following in order to protect yourself

It’s really sad how this cult-mentality has found a home online. And make no mistake it is a cult:

⁠Most if not all new entrants have come to them feeling desperate (with life in general or over something specific)

⁠Day 1 of being “accepted” into the cult is to have what little self worth you have left crushed by other members under the guise of “delivering the harsh truth” or even trying to “”help”” them.

⁠Isolation. The founders or longer standing members will ensure the new entrant never strays from the confines of the cult. Claiming to “””open their eyes””” to dangers that all conveniently exist outside of their group.

⁠Dependance. They will then make sure that you reject any form of help that is not exclusively provided within their walls. Berating therapists as ineffective is a popular narrative for cults to jump on since what constitutes effective therapy can vastly differ from person to person (not helped by the fact bad therapists sadly do exist)

⁠Preaching. Once you’ve internalised all of the toxic views of the cult they will then remind you of the “good” they’ve done for you and really make it hard to say no when it comes to returning the favour. This will usually manifest in reciting the cults beliefs now firmly ingrained to other desperate souls for the cycle to repeat, and for the cult to grow

People NEED to be able to identify these steps as it just makes me sad to see what can start as innocent desperation to be warped into hateful preaching (and much worse).

If you’re at all sexually / romantically desperate, I do not judge you for feeling the crushing weight of loneliness but PLEASE don’t ruin the potential for things to get better by buying into this manipulative group of cult-leaders who would sooner incite violence in their “lower ranking” members than actually do anything themselves. They do not care about you outside of what they can do unto you and get out of you. You are worth more than this community ❤️

TL;DR: Screw Cultcels (aka all Incel “communities”)

I can’t tell if you’re shitposting or literally retarded. But basically all of that is bullshit.

1. Telling people objective facts is no more soul crushing in this instance than in any other. If men are disadvantaged in the dating market, then why should they be deluded into thinking otherwise?

2. “Isolation“ is a meme at best. No one is forcing anyone to stop interacting with the outside world, many members have active social/career lives, and there’s nothing stopping anyone from logging out of their account, otherwise all these “ex incels” wouldn’t exist.

3. Dependance? We mock therapists because it’s retarded to think one can even begin to change all the external things that are wrong. Even the few “good” therapists only give the generic advice, many of us can’t afford it in the first place. Shit, many of us even encourage those who are able to go and get cosmetic surgery, since that’ll still at least assure you tangible results unlike (((therapy))).

4. Preaching? None of us spout any more rhetoric than what’s already there, if anything we have discussion regarding ways to cope with this shithole life filled with norm scum. And our so called “cult” wants nothing from its members, there’s no financial motive save for hosting websites, there’s not even anyone forcing us to stay. Users openly condemn fakecels and tell them to leave. If you wanna leave incel forums, just brag about all the Stacies you bang regularly.

Tldr: screw soyciety (aka faggots like you)

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

Allow me to reword the conclusion of this NR statement for endarkening clarification:

“In a world where fewer ugly, unfeminine, financially self-sufficient women can or need to rely on provider beta males, some will themselves take on the protective coloration of exaggerated male characteristics — blustering, cursing, belligerence, defiance, and also, as needed, promiscuity that leaves them feeling gross and unloved the next morning after Jack has slipped out the back.”

The view is coming into focus now.

Loudmouthed feminists are more often than not:

ugly,
out of shape chunksters,
unfeminine androgynes,
older, Wall-victim spinsters,
spiteful, LSMV misfits…

who simultaneously loathe and envy the natural freedom and energy of male sexual desire. Because feminists are losers in the sexual marketplace, (and because they know it), they seek to tear down the organic, biomechanically-grounded social and sexual orders and replace them with bizarre androgynous dystopias that help them feel better about themselves. Their justified feelings of low self-worth cause them to lash out at men in the aggregate, (and particularly at lower value beta males), and at prettier, feminine women who by their mere existence daily remind feminists of their pitiful ranking in the hierarchy of female romantic worth.

When losers stop knowing their place, and begin insisting their betters are no such thing, and worse when the losers have acquired the power and means to punish their betters, you get what we have today: A failure to propagate; to propagate as a race and to propagate as a successful civilization.

Dr. Bob Griffin #fundie baptistboard.com

It was a movement of humanism, human self-worth, human as God. It was called Unitarianism (often called Universalism today). It's new Gospel was one of rights and dignity and good works - a social Gospel of 'do-gooders' to replace the blood of Christ. THAT group were the core of the rabid abolitionist movement sweeping some northern areas (like Massachusetts). Social programs, strong government laws, liberal liberal liberal agenda.

FaceandHFD #racist #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Blackpill] Germanic people have the cuck gene

”Prenatal testosterone influences adult men’s behavior toward women”, Psypost
germanics = high t = whiteknights
Apparently they are more agreeable with women, but very hostile to other men. Matriarchy is in their DNA and germanic men derive their self-worth from female validation. That's why so many of them seem to completely disregard their own well-being to protect women that might not even be theirs.
image

TheIncelPill #sexist reddit.com

The Myth of Self-Improvement

The biggest, ultimate COPE practiced by practically everybody on the planet is the belief that they have control over their own biology. If only they try hard enough! Then, one day, someday, everything will change! A believe most people have on this sorry planet, yet we still see most people remain tremendously average. Because as much as they'd hate to admit it, their very conscious, their soul, is just as anchored to biology as their physical athleticism. And no matter how hard you train, you're never going to beat Usain Bolt. Nor are you going to become the next Albert Einstein or Bill Gates.

It is pretty obvious that some men will always be more athletic than others. And recent research indicates that other aspects of men are just as unchangeable. We do not know how to improve IQ through education alone. Most people who have significant weight loss will gain it all back. Even personality traits seem to be significantly genetic. But when we say that our ability to get laid is mostly set and stone, both Blues and Reds FREAK THE FUCK OUT. "Its your personality, you misogynist freak!" "Just lift, bro." "Don't you even know game?" They cannot stand biological determinism, because it represents a counter to everything they stand for. But as the least successful of men, we know that, no matter what we do, we cannot get laid to save our lives. And I mean this in a very literal sense.

The Blue Pill - The Hope

Honestly, I'm outright tired of addressing why The Blue Pill is wrong so many times, only for us to be strawmanned anyways. To put it simply, The Blue Pilled really do believe in a Just World Fallacy. Men who are friendly and fun get laid, men who are rude and, well, evil don't. That is the extend of their philosophical rigor. No explanation for the divorce epidemic, hybristophilia, celebrity obsession, ancestral sexual success, or harems. They just believe a nice guy can't be nice unless he regularly slays pussy. In fact, men who sexually succeed can't be assholes, because women want them. The real truth is somewhere in between, but Blue Pill refuses to admit women can be shallow at every turn.

Our "personality" is the least of our problems. If The Blue Pill "theory" that misogyny is the cause of our virginity, and not the other way around, then we would have seen some sexual success while we still drank the Kool-Aid. In fact, many of us were just as Blue Pilled as the current posters (I certainly know I was). Yet female interest never happened. Their "theory" holds no water.

That's all I'm willing to say no Blue Pill nonsense. The more important issue is what The Red Pill exposes. Does The Red Pill hold any more water?

The Red Pill - The Cope

Ostensibly, The Red Pill uses real, evolutionary psychology to attain sex from nubile, fertile females. And on paper, much of what they write makes sense. Females are interested in musculature. Therefore, you must lift weights. Females are interested in social dominance. Therefore, you must pass shit tests, maintain frame, and acquire value. However, there is a world's difference from recognizing these attributes and being able to attain them yourself.

Men are both with a predisposition to certain personality traits. Some men have more testosterone and other hormones/enzymes to ward off fat and attain muscle mass. Kids don't exactly lift, but that doesn't change the fact we can tell who the jocks are by Junior High. A jock who has a dry spell can use this information to maximize his already top tier genes. A nerd or an Incel will find far fewer success.

Even if it is technically possible for a normie to become a muscle God, most normies lack the biological willpower to achieve the results. The "Alphas" of TRP CONSTANTLY praise the life changing effects of lifting. It will boost your confidence, make you slay pussy, and most importaly, make you feel like a GOD. Well, sorry, if lifting was actually the soul-cleansing activity TRP says it was, people would actually fucking do it. "Don't lift for pussy, do it for yourself!" is an absolute excuse for the back-breaking labor men do in their desperate attempt to get female sexual validation. If -people were sexually attracted to fatsos, every gym on the planet would look like a ghost town. Even when I tried to lift weights, I NEVER enjoyed it beyond the brief testosterone pulse afterwards. Yet, if I brought up this fact to a TRPer, they would be angrier than if I said I was going to rape their son. It is a cult to them, and they will not take any excuse for you to not join their religion. Apparently, you must do it for yourself, whenever you want to or not.

And what are the actual, on the field results behind the constant Alpha posturing? Well, as far as I know, no scientific study has been performed to measure the success of PUA/Red Pill philosophy. However, I will point out that, despite painting it like a miracle drug, one of the core tenants of The Red Pill is to expect constant failure in approaches

Some tidbits of Alphaness:

Buddy had a 3% rule... He'd go up to a girl, say," Nice shoes. Wanna fuck?" He got slapped a lot. But also got laid a lot too. There is no lose. You win or you learn.

Tinder I have around 200 matches(3 1/2 months) and Ive banged 11

Out of the 160 openers, I have a 5.00% success rate in landing a date. And out of the 160 openers, I got laid 3.13% of the time

You're looking at about 3% (sex) for a daygame cold approach.

I asked out over 200 women. In the end, I got 60 numbers, 2 dates, and 0 lays.

You will never see this be advertised by whatever posturing douchebag, trying to peddle his advice to ugly, impressionable men. Even with all of the self-improvement in the world, your chances still remain in the low single digits. Its almost like self-improvement and game aren't particularly effective!

I'd like to believe that Red Pill Knowledge has at least SOME effect, but it seems rather clear that not only is there no evidence TRP will make you a pussy slayer.

The Black Pill - The Rope

The ultimate conclusion one has to make is that most females look at the same type of attractive man, that is largely determined by biological factors. Lifting will not change your face. Game won't remove your autism. And concepts like abundance mentality and dread game are impossible to achieve unless you're already sexually and financially successful. You can't have abundance when you fail 97 tries out of 100, or are a kissless, hugless, romanceless virgin. Nothing you read on the web is going to make you wealthy, and for as many ventures that succeed, many more will fail.

The Black Pill is the ultimate representation of reality. Most pussy slayers have never even heard of The Red Pill or Game. Yet they still slay pussy. This is because they were born as Chad Thundercock, not made.

As Incels, the moment we reached out-of-college age without losing our V-cards, all hope is lost. Maybe if we become rich we'll get laid. MAYBE. But there is no point in dedicating our lives to the gym nor haranging every single female we need in "Day Game". We are virgins because we are unattractive: nothing but a miracle will change that.

ItheIthe #sexist reddit.com

A Breakup Hurts a Femoids Ego, Not Her Heart

Femoids don't feel love, they only care about their ego. If someone breaks up with a femoid, their ego is deflated. That is the only thing that matters to them. Females only enter relationships to heighten their feelings of self-worth and to increase their social status. They don't actually give a fuck about their partner.

CH #racist heartiste.wordpress.com

[A class in Toronto had an activity about racism and sexism]

Fuckin’ Toronto. Locus of equalist filth. It’s hardly worth the bother to itemize the lies and distortions of reality evident in this classroom activity designed with the purpose of derogating the self-worth of white men, but let’s have at it for entertainment value.

First, if anyone’s gonna be caught smoking at a subway station, it’ll be a Tonto in Toronto. Blacks and whites smoke at about the same rates.

Second, no black woman waiting to ride a bus will gently rebuke a smoker in the King’s English: “Sir, could you please put out the cigarette as the smoke is being blown in my direction? I am very allergic to smoke. The sign on the wall says this is a no-smoking area.” :lol: !! Yeah, what universe does this happen in? More likely: “Yo, get dat smoke outta my face, mufugga, fo I wreck you azz!”

Third, the entire premise is a joke. Any leftoid twit who rides subways and buses, given enough anonymity and truth serum ABV, will admit that blacks are responsible for about, oh, 99% of infractions, annoying and lethal, on public transit. Fuckin’ white SWPLs who ride buses don’t smoke and anyhow wouldn’t be caught dead blowing smoke in the face of some ghetto momma. Toronto whites are probably like amped-up versions of urban striver faggot whites everywhere: bending over backwards to appease blacks and avoid setting off their infamous hair trigger tempers. You want a realistic conversation between a black woman and a chipmunk-cheeked white man at a bus station in SWPLville? Here:

Black woman: snarl

White superSWPL: smiles warmly Cute kid. Hey there little guy!

Black woman: Get yo perv ass outta here.

Fourth, the fantasy reply by the white man is something you wouldn’t hear in the West. Not anymore, now that white men have had their testosterone drained from them by constant brow-beating and the repulsive visage of fat women. But assuming there is a white man who would speak so impolitely, the facts support his imputation: 72% of blacks are born to single moms.

Reflective Questions

-Was oppression manifested in this situation?

Yes, I feel oppressed by the amount of tax dollars white men have to pay to grease your vocation of shitting on white men with impunity.

-What type of oppressions can you identify?

The Danegeld.

-What does this tell you about how oppression works?

If you’re in power, you get to dictate the who-whom terms.

-How would you have responded if you were the black person?

“That’s real retarded, sir.”

-How would you have responded as a witness?

Around blacks, never relax.

-Would you have responded at all?

I’d stop taking drugs if I heard a single black mom at a bus stop speak in coherent English.

You ever get the notion that these blurts of Cathedral brainwashing are revealing glimpses into their deepest and truest feelings? That in fact the Narrative is one big case of mass psychological projection? One day, sooner than the elite think, the white man will WAKE UP, and, if history is any guide, when the slumbering beast of the North is finally roused from hibernation the ground will shake and the heavens will rend with righteous retribution.

Or not, and this beautiful creation of Western whites will slowly decay into a cesspool of encroaching Third Worldism and corn and porn saturated ennui. Place your bets.

Article "Sexual Property" #fundie en.kingswiki.com

Sexual property, under patriarchy, is what wives are recognized as. Adultery is a crime against sexual property.[1] In the Jewish faith, women were seen as man's sexual property, but equal in comradeship, homemaking and parenthood (e.g. Fiddler on the Roof).

Carole Pateman notes, "The patriarchal construction of sexuality, what it means to be a sexual being, is to possess and to have access to sexual property. . . . In modern patriarchy, masculinity provides the paradigm for sexuality; and sexuality means sexual mastery. The 'individual is a man who makes use of a woman's body (sexual property); the converse is much harder to imagine."[2]

Stanford M. Lyman writes, "A nearly unbounded wrath is sometimes aroused by the appropriation of another's sexual property. Treated in the classic sociological essay by Kingsley Davis as jealousy, this emotional state and its attendant response are also understandable as an angry reaction to lost self-esteem. . . . Of all the types of properties over which dominion is sought, sexual property seems to evoke the most intimate connection to self-worth. The bonds of love or affection express not only one's own feelings toward the other, but also an implicit reciprocal image of these feelings toward oneself. . . . Sexual property above all others is likely to engender vanity and pride in, and satisfy a fundamental need of, its possessor. Accordingly, an attack on one's sexual property usually cuts a deep wound in one's self-esteem. . . . A jealous regard for one's own dearly purchased prize in the marketplace of love may arouse the most intense fears, deepest insecurities, and ultimately his most ferocious wrath as a threatened possessor fights to preserve his pride, passion, and property. And precisely because jealousy arises out of the most significant elements of self-esteem, its fury might know no bounds."[3]

Thus, it should come as no surprise that when wives refuse to fulfill their proper roles as sexual property, their husbands sometimes get angry, as she is essentially appropriating herself.

Classic Dick #fundie menarebetterthanwomen.com

All Women Are Whores
I have received well over a thousand supportive emails from women over the last 48 hours. Unsurprisingly to me, the topic they’re the most encouraging about is my comment on whores and all women being them.

All women are whores.

Keep in mind that I consider female anger to be the weather vane of truth and wisdom. When a woman finally has a heart attack after reading something I’ve written, I’m going to start calling myself Buddha.

King Buddha.

That’s why no women are allowed to read this.

Women know themselves almost as well as I know them. They know they’re prone to emotion and anger, and they know they’re all whores. That’s why they get so goddamn upset when I say it. To a woman, calling attention to her innate prostitution is more true than anything else I could possibly say.

But that’s only because women understand math and science about as far as a dog can shit.

Women crave money because they don’t have things like purple hearts, fist fights, and prom queens. They have nothing to validate their self-worth except how much a man will pay for access to their vagina. That’s why they spend money like it’s poison. The albatross of a 100 dollar bill is nothing but shame to a woman. It is a constant reminder of her nature.

All women are whores.

Robert Gagnon #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Male and female together combined provide us a facet of who God is, a more holistic way than only one sex involved, so when sexual activity is engaged in we see a fuller range of who God is, it helps to balance out the two sexes. One of the reasons that we see such a high incidence of measurable harm in male homosexual and female homosexual unions is we don’t have in those unions the balancing influence of the other sex. So in the case of male homosexual unions, you have a higher incidence of sexually transmitted infections, much lower rate of monogamy, because basically what you have is male sexuality ratcheted up without a taming influence of a woman in the process. Whereas for female homosexual relationships you see a higher incidence of mental illness issues and lower longevity of the relationship generally, I think because women place more value in terms of their self-worth, their identity, their security in a relationship of this sort. And when two women put the same high demands on each other, without the balancing of a masculine influence, again it leads to shorter terms unions on average and higher mental health issues that are involved.

Need Kareiva #fundie christiannews.net

I have to laugh at these two unhinged Wisconsin buffoons who spend their miserable lives (trust me, they are miserable) worrying that someone in some government or public entity somewhere in the United States might invoke the divine in some manner or capacity. Perhaps their self-worth is at stake, considering they're having to worry about what an out of state governor believes might help in his state's largest city.

Annie & Dannie boy are bothered by Gov. Bevin's "inflammatory" comments & cite Charlottesville as an instance of how his comments will cause physical violence. I guess they want him to be silent, AKA, restrict him from exercising his 1st Amendment rights. Funny but I don't see an exemption for public officials in terms of one's right to speak, the same way I still can't find that pesky "separation of church & state" clause. Try a little harder, Annie & Dannie.

At least one good thing I can say about the ACLU (contrasted to the haters at FFRF): they defend inflammatory speech & they actively did so in Charlottesville. Their credo for incendiary language is for more incendiary (or non, as the cast may be) language. The FFRF essentially wants to shut the Kentucky governor's mouth. They could learn a thing or two from the ACLU. Perhaps they should. Granted, the ACLU might have an issue with any actions that occur as a result of Gov. Bevins' talking points. But unlike the FFRF, the ACLU won't seek to shut his voice.

Rajkumar Richard #fundie christianapologeticsalliance.com


A god Who Admits All People to Heaven is…(God Cannot Save All People)

Very minimally, Universalism or Inclusivism asserts that God will save all people whether they believe in Christ or not. However, Universalism severely debilitates God, which I will now strive to elaborate.

For the purpose of differentiating the god of the Universalists from the living Triune God, I have named the god of the Universalists as ‘unigod.’

Who is this unigod, who supposedly saves all people? What is he worth?

Worth Nothing – A Cruel, Unjust God, Unmindful of Sins

Man, if he is to love and worship God, should be aware of God’s attributes or nature. Minimally, love and justice are significant communicable attributes. (Attributes that are perfect in God but also found in humans to a degree are ‘Communicable Attributes.’)

A god who loves all, even those who hate and abuse him, seems to be a loving God. But a careful examination of this love reveals cruelty.

Those who hate God say, “I do not want to live with God.” But if God forces those who hate HIM to be with HIM unto eternity, this certainly smacks of slavery. Holding people against their will is slavery. None accept, agree, or admire slavery. This is cruelty in its glory.

But this is apparently what unigod does to people. Unigod forces people to be with him unto eternity. So, unigod is not loving, but cruel.

Consider God’s attribute of justice. Justice is a disposition to do that which is morally right. Presence of ‘right’ requires a ‘wrong;’ this is analogous to rust requiring a metal.

Since evil is rampant in the world, common man expects the authorities to punish evil. But unigod, as an apparent ultimate authority, does not punish evil, for he allows even a horrendously evil person to enter into heaven.

We would be extremely saddened and frustrated if we are victims of injustice. An authority who fails to provide justice is unjust or evil. By allowing a horrendously evil person to inherit the greatest good (heaven), the unigod reveals his unjust and evil attributes.

Significantly, unigod, who supposedly saves all people, is unmindful of sins. Sin is an assault on the Holy God, who is the maximally great being. But unigod, by virtue of apparently forgiving unrepentant people of their sins, does not consider sins to be an assault on HIS holiness.

In other words, holiness, love and justice are not the attributes of unigod.

Unworthy of Worship

Worship is man’s response to God’s worthiness. God should be worshipped for HE alone is worthy of our worship (adoration, thanksgiving, prayers etc.). God deserves this response from all people.

From the perspective of Historic Christianity, since God so loved the world, HE gave HIS only Son, so that those who believe in the Son of God will receive eternal life (John 3: 16). Salvation of mankind (those who believe in Christ) is an outcome of God’s love for man. Since salvation is God first act (through HIS love to redeem man from his sin), the believer loves God, and worships HIM always. The living God reveals HIS worth to HIS people by HIS blessed presence, and offers hope that HE, through HIS second coming, will fulfill all HIS promises (e.g. eliminate evil forever). Thus man worships this Almighty, loving, gracious and a compassionate God.

In contrast how does unigod reveal his worthiness to his people? All that he supposedly does is to save all men (universal salvation). If this is his only or primary revelatory act of worthiness, then unigod has placed himself in a precariously quicksand situation.

Think about this. We DO NOT need to worship unigod. What do we gain or lose by not worshipping unigod? Nothing!

Will we lose our salvation if we do not worship unigod? No, we will not lose our salvation.

If those who do not worship unigod will go to heaven, then why should man waste his time and energy in worshipping this unigod, when he can indulge in carnal hedonistic lifestyle?

The depraved mind of Universalists posits salvation for everyone – all and sundry – even those who do not worship unigod. In other words, unigod, who supposedly saves all people, declares himself to be unworthy of worship.

Worthy of Abuse

If you are unaware of Richard Dawkins’ intense abuse (an act of evil) of the living God, please read the endnote.1 (Proponents of Historic Christianity believe that Prof. Richard Dawkins, the bulldog of Atheism, will not go to heaven, if he does not repent of his sins and accept Christ the Lord as his Savior. The God of Historic Christianity is a holy God and in HIM is no sin, so sin cannot coexist with God.)

Thanks to Dawkins, we can now turn the tables.

Please brace yourself for an unmitigated and an indecent assault on unigod. The unigod is an evil, corrupt, depraved, putrid, brainless blockhead; he is a nonsensical dummy, foolish idiot, insanely ignoramus dolt, a nincompoop, and a senseless monkey. Anyone can mock and thoroughly disrespect unigod.2

Despite these abuses on unigod, Universalists claim that unigod will still save me!

Unworthy of Emulation

Just as how parents are emulated by children, God should be emulated by HIS disciples.

Universalists claim that all people will be saved despite their good or horrendous nature. If their god unconditionally accepts abuses, should not the Universalists unconditionally accept abuse from others?

If the Universalists fail to accept horrendous abuses upon themselves or their families and friends, they intuitively expose their opposition to or the limitation of their own god!

Historic Christianity asserts Christlikeness in the believers of Christ (Romans 8: 29 et al.). This is not a mere fact from the realm of the spiritual, but from the realm of the physical as well. Christians are called to bear fruit and much fruit (John 15).

The contentment and joy of a parent is directly proportional to the physical and behavioral resemblance of their child. If a child resembles the goodness of the parent, the parent will be greatly joyful and contented.

But in the case of Universalism, there is no resemblance of unigod in the lives of its disciples. The children of the alleged unigod exist in reality, but when the child is to resemble the parent, the children of unigod do not resemble their god, for their god cannot be resembled.

Conclusion

Universalism is a medievally mystical belief, bordering on insanity. The alleged god who admits all people into heaven is imaginary, and resides only in the depraved minds of the Universalists.

God cannot be unholy, evil, unjust, and unmindful of sins. Only an evil and an unjust being will be unmindful of sins. Moreover, a god who accepts and agrees with abuse of any intensity is a god without perfection and holiness. A being with such deplorable attributes is not God. In fact, God, as a maximally great being, cannot possess such appalling attributes.

Even man’s intrinsic dignity and self-worth prevents him from agreeing and accepting to abuses of any form or size. So a god who is awfully comfortable with abuses to the extent of supporting and welcoming evil is an evil god that resides only in the fantasies of certain minds.

Therefore, we reasonably claim that there is no unigod, and that universalism is nothing but a grand illusion.

Imperium Europa #fundie youtube.com

Ted Kaczynski is a genius and a hero. I recommend the small book he wrote very highly. It is called 'The Unabomber Manifesto: Industrial Society and its Future'. He wrote this manifesto before he was arrested. So it must have been written around 1996 at the latest, just when the Internet first began appearing in peoples' homes. His basic argument in this book is very sound and makes rational sense. And since 1996, technology has certainly increased even more dramatically; by leaps and bounds actually. And all this is to the great DETRIMENT of the basic psychological HUMAN fulfillments, dignity and self-worth that every person requires.

As technology increases, the REAL needs of the human soul and mind DECREASE. And people will be amazed at how accurately he predicted what the dystopian future would hold for us, if the technocracy wasn't destroyed. Thar future we are living in right NOW - if it can really be called "living". Hail Dr. Theodore Kaczynski, a hero for the ages. I salute you and the sacrifice you made for humanity. And it was your own blood brother who sold you out and caused you to be arrested and confined. You can't get any more low down than that. Your own BROTHER. I may be posting various sections of his book here in the future.

Tenebras Lux #fundie therepublicanstandard.com


There is so little that distinguishes today’s liberal Christians from the ancient Pagans to whom the gospel was originally preached, they would be more honest in dropping the name “Christian,” and adopting once again the title of Pagan.

Before I continue, the term liberal Christian is used in a theological and moral context, and not necessarily a political one. It comes from the 19th century in which Christians sought to liberate themselves from traditional orthodoxy in favor of a more progressive interpretation of doctrine in a modern world. It is possible for a political liberal to hold orthodox views on Christian theology, but the correlation against shows it is very rare. Furthermore, one can hold conservative political ideology and be very much a “Liberal Christian.”

One of the reasons Christians were so despised in Ancient Pagan Rome was because of their claim to exclusivity in the quest for eternal life. They were actually called atheists because they denied the validity of other (the Romans’) religion’s claims. They were intolerant of the pantheistic ideas Rome held, and were persecuted because of their arrogant claims that Jesus was the only way to eternal life.

Today, religious pluralism is once more in vogue, and to deny the validity of non-Christian claims to salvation – or to affirm the exclusivity of Christian claims to salvation – makes one almost immediately an arrogant bigot, and worthy of scorn. Pushed by popular culture icons such as Oprah, liberal pastors began to adopt the idea, and congregations soon followed. A Pew research poll found that 52% of professing Christians believed that even non-Christian faiths can lead to eternal life. Of course that doesn’t make their opinion correct (it only makes it unorthodox), but it does indicate how far the reach of religious pluralism – Paganism – has spread today.

Pagan Rome and Greece were notorious for their licentious sexual activities and wanton lasciviousness in the pursuit of pleasure. Homosexuality was not considered a sin; in fact, it was rather expected in their cultural milieu. While they never went so far as to call a homosexual union a civil marriage, no state or custom apparently tried to prevent the practice, but instead encouraged it in certain instances. This was one of the sins that Paul preached against to the Corinthians, who were notorious in the Hellenic world – even to Cicero – for their lust and sexual liberty.

Liberal Christians now have come full circle, refuting overtly what Paul had preached and insisting that such activity is not only tolerable, but may be righteous in the sight of God. They no longer preach against perversion as outlined in the Bible, but celebrate it as much, if not more so, than the Pagans of Corinth or Rome.

Perhaps the latest iteration of Paganism to manifest itself in the professing Christian Church is the toleration toward polyamory. One could predict it wouldn’t be long, given the logic of sexual acceptance based solely on the litmus test of “consent.” (Not the objective consent of the Creator, mind you, but the subjective consent of the Creation.) Today, ordained ministers in the Christian Church are not just tolerating the idea of polyamorous relationships, but are encouraging it as a scriptural sacrament.

Jeff Hood, a minister in the Southern Baptist Convention justified his views on holy polyamory by invoking the Holy trinity:

~~~~

“I heard the voices of the polyamorous repeatedly whispering, ‘Why are you persecuting us?’ Unable to contain myself, I shouted out, ‘Forgive me!’ At that moment, I collapsed. Before I perished, I felt the pull.

“Divine polyamory found me a sinner and lifted me up by grace. The Holy Trinity ushered me to love. Looking around, I saw a great cloud of polyamorous witnesses shouting, ‘Holy! Holy! Holy, is the polyamorous love of God!’”

~~~~

Utter blasphemy. “Without the polyamorous we cannot know God,” Hood also says.

What this reminds me of is the same orgiastic culture so prevalent in Pagan Rome and Greece – the same culture to whom the Apostles and the Church Fathers fought so hard to preach the Gospel, in order to free them from their sins.

In the second century, Marcus Minucius Felix wrote an apologetic dialogue responding to Pagan criticisms of the Christian Church, and in this dialogue Felix exposes the same behaviors outlined above, and goes further to chastise the Pagan culture for their abhorrent practice of abortion and infanticide:

“And I see that you at one time expose your begotten children to wild beasts and to birds; at another, that you crush them when strangled with a miserable kind of death. There are some women who, by drinking medical preparations, extinguish the source of the future man in their very bowels, and thus commit a parricide before they bring forth. And these things assuredly come down from the teaching of your gods.”

Of course, for Liberal Christians today, they would never dare preach against abortion, but instead have come full circle into celebrating the sacrifice of children upon the Saturnine altar of the god “self-worth”.

So this raises the question: If Liberal “Christians” have re-adopted so many of the Pagan practices that the early Church evangelists preached against; and if they deny the validity of those fundamental characteristics that distinguish Christianity from Paganism (like the exclusivity of Christ), why do they insist on calling themselves Christians? If they would stop pretending, I might respect them more intellectually; but the fact remains they blaspheme the name of Christ and His work when they continue to celebrate as righteous that which God has explicitly forbidden.

Kasey Edwards #fundie brisbanetimes.com.au

Why I won't let any male babysit my children

When our first daughter was born my husband and I made a family rule: no man would ever babysit our children. No exceptions. This includes male relatives and friends and even extracurricular and holiday programs, such as basketball camp, where men can have unrestricted and unsupervised access to children.

Eight years, and another daughter later, we have not wavered on this decision.


Group slumber parties are also out. When there is a group of excited children it is far too easy for one of them to be lured away by a father or older brother without being noticed.

When my daughter goes on play dates I make sure that she will be supervised by a woman at all times. So far she has only slept at one friend's house. Beforehand I spoke to my friend about our rule and clarified that if she's going to pop out to shops for example and intends to leave our daughter in the care of her husband or another man then the sleepover cannot happen.

As you can imagine, this was not an easy conversation to have. To my friend's credit she respected our family policy even though she doesn't have the same rules herself. In subsequent play dates and sleepovers my friend has rearranged logistics so that she can be present at all times.
I am certain that some of my other friends and acquaintances would not react so graciously and would see my request as a direct attack on their husbands and/or their parenting choices. I am dreading the day when I have to have the same conversation with someone who will not be as understanding.Advertisement
Would I prefer to be a more chilled out parent? Absolutely.

Will I change my family policy? Unfortunately no. Child sexual abuse is so prevalent that I won't back down on my no-male-babysitters policy.

To be clear, I'm not saying that all men are sexual predators. Nor do I think that men harbour predatory instincts that lie dormant only to spring forth at the first opportunity.

But child abuse by men is so common that taking precautions to keep my daughters safe is a no-brainer.

According to the Australian Institute of Family Studies the prevalence of child sexual abuse is 1.4-8 per cent for penetrative abuse and 5.7-16 per cent for non-penetrative abuse for boys and 4-12 per cent for penetrative abuse and 13.9-36 per cent for non-penetrative abuse for girls.

To put those figures into context, the "best case" scenario is that 1 in 20 boys are sexually abused. The worst case is that 1 in three girls are.

Yes, women can also abuse, but as the Australian Institute of Family Studies' Who Abuses Children fact sheet makes clear, "Evidence overwhelmingly indicates that the majority of child sexual abuse is perpetrated by males."

An Australian Institute of Criminology 2011 paper "Misperceptions about child sex offenders" shows 30.2 per cent of child sexual abuse was perpetrated by a male relative, and 13.5 per cent by the father or stepfather. A tiny 0.8 per cent of cases were perpetrated by mothers and stepmothers, and 0.9 per cent of child sexual abuse was perpetrated by a female relative. The other categories of perpetrators were family friend (16.3 per cent), an acquaintance or neighbour (15.6 per cent), another known person (15.3 per cent) – without specifying the gender split.

Data from the US National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) showed that males made up 90 per cent of adult child sexual assault perpetrators, while 3.9 per cent of perpetrators were female, with a further 6 per cent classified as "unknown gender".

While we're all terrified by the prospect of strangers abusing our kids and most of us would never let our young child walk around the streets by themselves, the Australian Institute of Criminology paper said that "in the vast majority of cases, children's abusers are known to them".

Children are at far greater risk from relatives, siblings, friends, and other known adults such as priests, teachers and coaches.

The blanket rule against allowing our daughters to be in the care of lone male adults means that we do not have to make a moral assessment of every man. My husband and I do not want to delve into the characters of every man that we know and assess whether or not they are potential sexual predators, so we apply our rule to all men to avoid casting aspersions on people.

We're also not sure if we can trust our judgement. If anything, the statistics suggest that many parents aren't very good at determining which male adults are safe and which are not.

No doubt some people will call me a man hater and, just as we saw with the backlash against Tracey Spicer's article as a couple of years back about not wanting her unaccompanied children sitting next to a man on a plane, people will react as if the protection of children is secondary to men's right not to be offended.

But dismissing this as a hysterical reaction of a misandrist is not only incorrect, it's also missing the point spectacularly. My husband and my decision is based on straightforward risk analysis: a cold, hard, unemotional reading of the statistical data.

When I look at my daughter's class lining up on assembly and think that statistically between one and nine of them are going to be sexually abused before they reach adulthood, I am determined to do everything I can to make sure my daughter is not going to be one of them.

I know it's a hard line, some would say extreme. But I also know that sexual abuse can rob a child of their self-worth and dignity in an instant – and it can take decades for those wounds to heal, if at all.

In this context, potentially hurting peoples' feelings is the price my husband and I are prepared to pay.

felinecentric #sexist reddit.com

It seems the way that some TIMs respond to 'misgendering' reflects male socialisation. I was thinking about how seriously men are taught to take gender performance and outward shows of 'respect' for that performance. When boys are growing up, there are displays of competitiveness that get wrapped up in their developing masculine identity. Competitiveness isn't a bad thing in itself, but when someone bases their self-worth on how good they are at an activity that society sees as gendered, then you're going to run into trouble.

To a boy, being good at football/programming/debating/collecting are not just pleasurable in themselves, but grounds on which they're taught they need to prove something - their masculinity. Although this masculinity is seen as intrinsic to boys, it's also something which they're constantly called upon to prove, or else they become almost as lowly as a girl in the gender caste system.

This is why the taunt of, 'you do x like a girl' is seen as a personal insult: girls aren't socialised to see their activities as matters of identity. Girls are socialised with the expectation that they must 'comply' to certain standards of femininity, or risk the consequences.

Telling a woman that she 'cleans like a man' isn't seen as an assault on her identity; instead it's a comment on her competence at performing a task that patriarchy has assigned to her sex caste. She's punished for not pretending/trying hard enough in the submissive role, not for failing to prove her femininity. There's a difference which I'm trying to articulate. So, regarding TIMs - they have that uptightness about gender roles that I recognise in men, but is absent from women. This is why TIMs take pronouns seriously, when to most women they don't even register on their list of things that make up their lived experiences as females. When asked the question, 'how would YOU like it if someone called you he/him/sir?' many women sort of shrug it off; they would be a little irritated at most. Men get why TIMs are uptight about these things because they're also uptight about them, due to their shared socialisation.

TIMs are trying to 'prove' that they have transitioned to a new gender role, and the way they often behave reflects the way that boys behave in order to prove that they're boys. Using the wrong pronouns is seen as starting a fight with them, 'dissing them'. That's how it appears to me, anyway. Has anyone ever seen a TIF get as uptight as many TIMs do about misgendering? I'm sure it happens, which means my theory might need tweaking a bit. Possibly some TIFs copy this obvious facet of male behaviour in their attempt to transition?

ikissedgodsmouth #fundie ikissedgodsmouth.tumblr.com

After the Abortion

If society denies the mother’s loss, her body does not. She prepares psychologically and physically for motherhood. When a woman is pregnant she feels different. Within a few days after conception, even before the tiny embryo has nested in her uterine wall, a hormone called ‘early pregnancy factor’ is found in her bloodstream, alerting the cells of her body to the pregnancy. Her body may now crave different foods, she may need more rest. New cells begin to grow in her breasts, cells which will mature and secrete milk specially formulated for the needs of a newborn. She begins to think ‘baby.’ She starts noticing babies on the street, in the store, on television. She may dream about her baby at night, and fantasize about her baby during the day. What name? Who will he or she look like?

But if she wants to have an abortion she must try to stop this process. She must deny the maternal feelings entering into her consciousness. She must believe that what is inside of her is not fully a baby. She must stop the process of thinking about her baby as ‘her baby.’

But although her mind may say one thing, her emotional life and her body cells say another. If she has the abortion, the very cells of her body remember the pregnancy and know that the process of change that had been going on was stopped in an unnatural manner. Her body and her emotions tell her that she is a mother who has lost a child. And so it is not surprising that after the abortion, a pain begins to emerge from the depths of her heart. She has a loss to mourn, but cannot allow herself to grieve. Grieving would require admitting to herself that a child was killed in the abortion and that she shares responsibility for her child’s death. This is a very heavy burden to bear, and so, she resorts to denial in order to cope: denial of the baby’s humanity, ‘it wasn’t a baby so I have nothing to grieve or feel guilty about’, and denial of her emotional pain. ‘I should feel okay about this,’ she reasons. ‘Everyone else does. I must not feel this way or think about the abortion.’

Abortion is an extremely unnatural experience for a woman’s body and her maternal instinct. Negative reactions are to be expected. 85% of women report that they are surprised at the intensity of their emotional reaction to the abortion. These reactions included discomfort with children, feelings of low self-worth, guilt, feelings of anger, depression, grief, increased alcohol use, crying, inability to communicate and feeling suicidal.

Melissa Ohden. #fundie ncregister.com

Beginning Aug. 24, 1977, for five consecutive days, medics in a hospital in Iowa tried to kill Melissa Ohden.

But she was not born yet. She was 31 weeks into gestation when a doctor drained the amniotic fluid from her mother’s uterus and replaced it with saline solution. Within 48 hours he calculated the caustic fluid would burn her skin, incinerate her lungs and eventually cause her heart to stop. Dead, her corpse would miscarry onto the delivery table and be trashed as an abortion statistic.

But the procedure failed. Still within her mother’s womb after two days, a Pitocin drip was introduced to induce labor, and Melissa was delivered five days later. Suffering acute respiratory distress and weighing a mere 2 pounds 14.5 ounces, she still managed “a spontaneous weak cry.” Hearing the plaintiff plea, rather than abandoning her to die, a compassionate nurse nearby rushed her to the neonatal intensive care unit, where she was treated for severe medical complications. Two months later, she was welcomed into the loving arms of her adoptive parents and carried back to their home in Iowa.

The full details of Ohden’s abortion survival story are now chronicled in her new book You Carried Me: A Daughter’s Memoir. The author is a wife and the mother of two children. She is also the founder of Abortion Survivors Network.

At age 14, after learning the devastating truth of her abortion survival, she embarked on a complex 30-year journey to recover her sense of self-worth and to find the answers to her agonizing questions, including: “Where did I come from? Whose blood runs through my veins?” and “Why did you try to kill me?” En route, she established and re-established relationships, became a speaker for the pro-life movement, and discovered a new mission. As she defines it, “To be a voice not for myself, but for others.”

Ohden speaks with authority, merited by many courageous battles described in the book. She is a voice for those wounded by abortion. She is a voice for abortion survivors attacked or silenced by abortion advocates unable to reconcile their support for the murderous procedure with the existence of living survivors. She is a voice of forgiveness for the sorrowful who regret their abortions or their complicity in abortions. And she is a voice for the unborn who have no voice. As one mother told her, recalling how, as a pregnant teenager, Ohden’s voice had pierced her conscience while she sat, tearful, listening to her testimony, “I want you to know that you saved a life. You were a voice for my little girl when she didn’t have one.”

In the book, Ohden verifies her word with photocopies of original medical records she obtained from the day of her birth. Just one among many seemingly miraculous finds along her journey, not only did they finally reveal for Ohden the names of her birth parents (per author’s note, names “blacked out” to protect their identities), but they also provided corroborative evidence against those who called her a liar. As documented: “On August 24, saline infusion for an abortion was done but unsuccessful.”

In the end, Ohden’s story reveals joy, offers hope and inspires prayer. As she says, “God protected me to be a voice for the voiceless — and their mothers.” From her first “spontaneous weak cry” until now, Ohden continues her mission.

The Postman #fundie city-data.com

I find it funny how few people see the obvious connection between sexual liberation (viewed as a good thing) and the increased sexual objectification of women (viewed as a bad thing). Now i know women have always been objectified, but today there's such an emphasis on 'being sexy', you have 10 year old girls trying to be sexy. Do some people, including feminists, want their want to have their cake and eat it to (i know stupid saying)? I mean if you wanna express your sexuality, fine, nothing against that, just don't act all prudish when men admire your assets, is all I'm saying. I'm not saying it's an invitation to rape, but you have to admit it promotes more lewd/animalistic behaviour, because thats our nature. Just look at music videos and porn being so mainstream...I'm not sure if I want to be a parent in this era...


[IDK. It sounds like your saying men aren't civilized and cant be expected to take responsibility for controlling their desires and actions therefore it is a woman's responsibility to suppress their own sexuality or its our fault if we are objectified.

While I agree our society has become more openly sexual I don't agree that it has increased the objectification of women. As you stated that has been going on since the beginning. If anything it has probably decreased the objectification and increased the empowerment as the naked female body is seen as less taboo.]

What does 'controlling their desires' mean though? If a man gets aroused at a woman in a bikini is that his fault? Now he can make the decision to force himself on her, but that would be wrong, but he'll still objectify her. That is just nature. But that's not even what I'm talking about. Women want to have sexual freedom, they like sex...yes, that's nothing new too...if they want to show off their body in such a sexual manner, have a lot of hook ups/be promiscuous, they have to expect men will lust after them, right? If they can accept that, then fine. The thing is, this will simply lead to self-worth being based more on looks and sexiness.

You seriously think women are less objectified now than in the past? Look at advertising, look at music videos, compare now and 100 years ago. One could argue that in some ways men respected women more 100 years ago, while in some ways they respected them less. It's a bit of both, but the sexual objectification is part of sexual liberation, whether we like it or not.

In that case women are objectified as much as ever. There are still women in beer commercial, Hooters girls, pretty but incompetent waitresses...it's not all one-sided, too...many women TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS, so I get sick of women always thinking it's the man's fault for this happening...that's what I'm talking about.

Women say 'we don't wanna be objectified', but they flaunt their sexuality and USE it for their own purposes. Not ALL (obviously) but a lot. And pop culture and society promote this, 'you can use your sex appeal to get to the top,' 'if you've got it flaunt it' attitude. Now do you get it?

Allan Cronshaw #fundie ebionite.com

Our True Identity is defined by our Eternal Soul -- and those who lack Soul-Memory or Soul-Knowledge, which includes the memory of the previous lives our Soul has lived, must be understood as being the victims of Arrested Mental Development which results in the affliction of Spiritual-Amnesia. In the same way that the Natural Laws develop the physical body and evolve our physical form into adulthood -- the same Natural Laws will evolve the mind to the absolute zenith of Enlightened Consciousness.

But because choice and freewill is necessary in the development of the mind, our beliefs have the power to totally derail the process of evolutionary-development -- delaying each level of development unto those beliefs have been corrected. Erroneous beliefs cannot serve as a building platform to achieve higher growth and development. As an integral part of the development of the mind, beliefs that are defective or untrue, must be overcome before the developing mind can move beyond that level of understanding.

When rightly used for their intended purpose which their authors composed them, the scriptures are designed to be used to restore Soul-Memory and the prodigal son's connection with his Spiritual Source of Being. But when these same scriptures are used as if they were a history book -- thereby throwing away the Key of Knowledge in the manner of the scribes and Pharisees -- the scriptures not only render the person spiritually impotent, but actually inhibit the necessary development of mind and inner spiritual connection to that person's Higher Source of Mind and Being.

"This is what the LORD says: 'Cursed are those who put their trust in mere humans, who rely on human strength and turn their hearts away from the LORD'" (Jeremiah 17:5). The scriptures are not historical accounts -- but rather, accounts of the body, mind and spirit that must be experienced by the faithful and sincere seeker. To use the scriptures in accord with the thinking of men who read the sacred writings as if they were a history book -- instead of seeking the meaning of the allegorical writings directly from the Lord -- is the folly of carnal men whose rejection of the Lord as their Teacher, is the self-imposed curse of the Word of God.

As it is written: "Let not many of you become teachers, my brethren, knowing that as such we will incur a stricter judgment" (James 3:1). Those who teach without first restoring Soul-Memory, teach and lead blindly, and have yet to first remove the beam from their own eyes! And when a person follows the blind leaders, they are led in the wrong direction. Ultimately, all of mankind has the innate potential to evolve through the necessary levels of mental-development to achieve the absolute Celestial Level of an Enlightened Mind and Being -- but because of bad choices and self-defeating actions, the vast majority of people inhibit their own potential and birth-right, and embrace the choices and paths that derail their development.

No one can be a teacher or authority -- whether religious, academic, or cultural -- while failing to have achieved the necessary level of self-knowledge that has enabled them to have acquired Soul-Memory -- thereby overcoming their own affliction of Spiritual-Amnesia, and restoring their mind and consciousness to their True Source of Being. From a Wholistic Perspective -- or what can be portrayed as the Higher Enlightened Vision of Self from the perspective of the Whole of our Being -- in contradistinction to the very limited human vision and understanding of self -- our ego-driven self-destructive nature causes us to be people who must rightly be portrayed as spiritual-imbeciles -- who by virtue of their thinking, mindset and lifestyle, have permitted themselves to be disenfranchised from their True-Self -- i.e., their unknown pre-existent Eternal Soul-Self.

An imbecile can be defined as "a mentally deficient person" -- and those who lack Soul-Memory, are themselves the victims of arrested mental development. Therefore, when it is understood that Soul-Memory is an integral part of the developmental process of mind that IS NECESSARY to evolve each of us to a condition of true higher mental and spiritual maturity, then what we have is conformation of the statement: "For those who guide this people are leading them astray; And those who are guided by them are brought to confusion" (Isaiah 9:16 NASB).

How would you like to portray people who have what would constitute a mental affliction that causes them to utilize only a fraction of their own resources of mind? Whatever you choose to call such people, they are presently your leaders. And it is because the people are being led by mentally undeveloped spiritual-imbeciles whose thinking, mindset and lifestyle present an obstacle to mental and spiritual development, they have caused the people they lead to dwell in a state of abject confusion and self-ignorance.

(..)

One of the essential elements and aspects of the Original Gospel Teachings, was to initiate Soul-Memory in the sincere seeker of Truth and the Kingdom. In the same way that physical maturity can only come and manifest in stages, this is also true of mental-development -- and is even more crucial in the individual person's spiritual-development. When we came into being at conception, we evolved to a certain point in the darkness of our mother's womb -- and this enclosed dark environment was necessary in our development of a fetus.

When rightly understood from a Wholistic Perspective, when we were born into this world we entered what can best be portrayed as the Womb of Mother-Earth -- and because the development of mind requires choice and freewill to attain the proper mental-growth and development, it can be said that our present womb-environment presents a different type of darkness that is necessary for the maturation process to be efective.

The problem is that choice requires freewill -- and improper beliefs, thought-patterns and lifestyle have the ability to derail our mental development. And while each of us has a physical body that has the potential to achieve the next stage of birth that enables us to arrive at a completed level of mankind's potential (see Entering The Kingdom Of Man ), it is because mental development MUST result from the choices and the exercise of freewill that is conducive to the mental-developmental process -- and the fact that our leaders lack the necessary Soul-Memory because of their own arrested development, where we find ourselves being guided down the path of self-ignorance and derailed mental development.

(..)

Therefore it can be stated that virtually all of mankind is presently dwelling in what the Gospels portray as the "outer darkness" of mind and being -- i.e., and in the same way that for the educational process to be effective in our system of education -- requiring a certain mindset and behavior -- this is also true in the School of Life that we were physically born into when we emerged out of our mother's womb. And the Original Gospel teachings presented to us the necessary path to achieve mental and spiritual development in pursuit of achieving the next stage of birth.

(..)

Among the important teachings that were suppressed by the Church, is the teaching that was preserved in Gospel of Thomas saying twenty-two which sets forth the requirement for our return to Spiritual Eden as demonstrated when the Disciples asked Jesus how the Inner Kingdom is entered, and "Jesus said to them, When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female; ...then will you enter the kingdom." In the process of restoring the oneness of Self that is allegorically portrayed as the restoral of the divided Adam and Eve through the process of eating the Divine Manna/Fruit of the Tree of Life -- and therefore making "...male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female", we are then able to achieve the next stage of birth that restores us to Spiritual Eden and a condition of At-Oneness with God.

The necessary thinking, mindset and lifestyle was portrayed as putting on the required "wedding garment" is what enables us to achieve the next stage of birth -- wherefore mankind who chooses not to put on the "wedding garment" is portrayed as dwelling is what is portrayed as the "outer darkness" of mind and being as personified in the words: "Bind him hand and foot, take him away, and throw him into the outer darkness; there is where the weeping and grinding of teeth will be.' For many are called, but few chosen". Those who dwell in the undeveloped levels of the "outer darkness" do not possess Soul-Memory. They are ignorant of their own Higher Eternal Soul -- and in their present separated condition, they are the epitome of self-ignorance -- i.e., "Jesus said, ...But if you will not know yourselves, you dwell in poverty and it is you who are that poverty". And mankind dwells in this condition of self-ignorance that has been portrayed as a type of death.

The Outer Darkness has also been portrayed as the Far Country in the parable of the prodigal son -- wherein mankind is portrayed as dwelling in a state of mental-suppression -- incapable of comprehending anything of a true higher reality. Mental Suppression can in many ways be likened to being the victim of retardation -- organic physical limitations that can almost be portrayed as a spiritual form of Down Syndrome. And while organic (physical) man possesses the innate ability to overcome and prevail over these limitations, few are willing to even make the effort. For thousands of years faux-clergy have been peddling "get-in-the-kingdom free tickets" that complacent people have been spiritually defrauded when they bought into the great hoax. The Gospel portrays these faux-clergy as wolves in sheep's attire who live off the various forms of the collection plate.

And in truth, what this means is that you have yourself been learning from religious clergy and authorities, teachers and professors in academia, and political and philosophical leaders, who by virtue of their own arrested-development, are themselves the victims of this same organic mental retardation. And this condition is so all-pervading, that Paul openly stated that he could not convey to the people who he, himself, taught what he portrayed as the "traditions" of the Gospel, the true spiritual meaning of the Gospel, because they would reject this spiritual meaning as "foolishness".

Hatred_Incarnate #fundie incels.co

Daily Reminder: Psychiatry and psychotherapy are Jewish scams!

The mental health industry is a Jewish scam!

Psychiatry and psychotherapy, at least in their modern post-20th century incarnations, were developed by two Jews. The first Jew was Sigmund Freud. He developed psychoanalysis. This pseudoscientific chicanery served as the dominant paradigm in psychiatry and psychotherapy until another Jew, Robert Spitzer, published the DSM-III in 1980. This "mental health" bible, which emphasized the so-called "biomedical model," replaced the Freudian psychoanalysis and psychodynamic theories of the earlier ones. Psychiatrists were now able to market themselves to a gullible public as real "doctors" practicing real "medicine," which enabled them to distinguish themselves from other psychotherapeutic practitioners by significantly increasing their scientific and medical credibility. The DSM-III also made the "mental health" industry significantly more lucrative, as psychiatrists were now able to bill insurance companies for their imaginary "treatments" and big pharmaceutical companies were able to rake in additional billions of dollars by manufacturing special drugs for each newly invented "illness."

Why psychiatry and psychotherapy are complete and utter bullshit and why you should stay far away from any piece of shit who says otherwise:

1.) The concept of "mental illness" is completely illogical. First, the concept is based on circular reasoning. The only evidence for the so-called illness is the behavior it's supposed to explain. The DSM defines "mental illness" as "a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning." However, this response begs the question because "dysfunction" is nowhere defined or explained in the DSM. (For more in-depth information, the reader is strongly encouraged to examine this series of articles: http://www.mindfreedom.org/kb/act/2003/mf-hunger-strike/hunger-strike-debate)

2.) Unlike other branches of medicine, psychiatry and psychotherapy have produced zero discoveries and zero cures. Historically, "mental illnesses" were only "discovered" when the APA voted them into existence. Similarly, "mental illnesses" like homosexuality and hysteria only ceased to exist when they were voted out of existence. Now ask yourself this question: Is this how actual science is conducted? Or is this how something only masquerading as science is conducted?

3.) Psychiatric diagnosis is not based on any examination of the brain, but on social disapproval. As in the Soviet Union and other totalitarian dictatorships, the purpose of psychiatric diagnosis is to humiliate, stigmatize, degrade and marginalize.

4.) JFL at so-called "talk" therapies meant to cure you of some imagined underlying brain pathology. Can you talk someone out of having cancer or diabetes? How could anyone be this stupid?

5.) All known "mental health" treatments, including electroshock, as well as all brain toxins known as antipsychotics and SSRIs, cause significant neurological dysfunction and brain damage. Prolonged exposure to these so-called drug treatments can even lead to an early death. Of course no shrink or "mental health" practitioner will ever tell you this because they're in the business of making money and living comfortably off your suffering (and stupidity).

6.) Did you know that any involvement in the "mental health" industry, including talking to therapists, drug treatment and psychiatric hospitalization, is positively associated with an increased risk of suicide? People have been known to jump off buildings and hang themselves to avoid these professional sadists and torturers in white coats.

7.) You can be legally forced to see a therapist or psychiatrist. This is state-sanctioned torture. If you ever find yourself in this situation, realize that your health and life are in great danger. Even if you're stupid enough to see them voluntarily, your health and life are still in danger.

8.) There are two kinds of criminals in this world: criminals above the law and criminals below. Psychiatrists and therapists belong to the first kind. This is why these professions are so attractive to people with sadistic inclinations. They can commit crimes against you and get away with it because of their professional status.

TL;DR It's a dangerous world out there, incels. Stay away from all shrinks and therapists.

(Emphasis original)

Personalityinkwell #sexist #psycho incels.co

[JFL] Daily reminder of normies and their retarded just world fallacy


Incel gets bullied, ostracized, and is denied sex, social interaction, basic jobs, and even respect form his family for being ugly.

"Oh life isn't fair, get over it"

"Incel" (who is most likely a government false flag) goes on a killing spree.

"Oh that's horrible, they didn't deserve to die in an unfair way"

:lul: :feelskek::lul::feelskek::lul::feelskek::lul::feelskek:

Get your story straight normalfags

Oh wait, you won't, you'll just use emotion and hivemind to convince yourself you are "right"

Yukon Jack #racist yukonjackrevolution.wordpress.com

What would life be like if we didn’t think like Jews? We would experience life if we lived outside the realm of the Jewish brain. Life is outside of the Jewish brain, the Jew tries to exploit all life, so life exists outside the realm of the Jew, all inside the control of the Jew are either dead on their way to be dead.

jewish brain trust Neocon allstars all Jews

Jewish rule is death, Judaism and it’s deadly offsprings are death cults. Why? Because of how the Jew thinks in terms of exploitation, dominance, and death. If humans are ever to live life then they must rid this planet of Jewish thinking patterns as detailed in Jewish holy books. To be a holy Jew is to be a killer of life, the Jew can only do one thing, and that is, end life.

Thinking in terms of exploitation is like looking at a tree as board feet of lumber. When a Jew looks at Goy he is looking at tree that needs cutting down, the Jew makes money by exploiting you just as if you make money on the tree by cutting it down. There is no money in letting the tree live.

The Jew only lets you live if you are a slave, the Jew will kill any nation not slaved to Jewish interest, this is what the Jew did to Germany. Germans are now slaves of the Jews, slaughtered for being independent of the Jewish banks until they were brought to heel. The Jew did not care how many died, then the Jew lied about the Holocaust, claiming the Jew was injured by World War 2.

NEXT TIME BE MORE CAREFUL TRYING TO ESCAPE JEWISH CONTROL

Jews are not just a problem, they are the problem, and attachment to Jewish myth makes you part of the problem. The solution is to dump Jewish myth about this angry god created during an earlier era were man had far more limited understanding of Nature. No one needs Yahweh and no one needs the Jew. Think about it, if Jews were all gone what would be the loss? But what would be the gain?

This planet would be a far better place if the Jew and his book were erased from memory, because no longer would we feel guilty for being born, no longer would we be ashamed of our nakedness, no longer would we fear hell and eternal punishment, no longer would we allow others to rule over us and judge us in the court system, or tax our sustenance for being alive.

Without the Jew who would need the CIA or the FBI, or National Security or a the police state of the terror war. All the Jew does is exploit, enslave and kill for profit. So how good things would be with no Jew. Humanity could experience real life if they could live outside of the Jewish brain.

JEWS ISRAEL INSANITY FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE

The ecosystem would like the Jew gone, for the Jew is the destroyer of life, and the earth is getting close to the breaking point. We can no longer ignore the exploitation myths, God didn’t give us dominion, we just took what we needed then we developed myths that allowed us to exploit with introspection or guilt. Jews exploit without guilt or care, that is why life outside of the Jewish brain is threatened for its very existence.

We would all be better off with a no-Jew planet. We would all be better off without their book. What humans can not understand is that Holy Bible is creating the hell, not saving us from the hell. The Bible is a brainwashing tool of the elite, it is our enslavement, and those at the bottom that promote it do so because of their own judgment and internal corruption.

You have to understand the internal process of the judgmental believer, they are attaching their ego to this book and making this book their innermost truth, framing their reality and then imposing it on the rest of us with the mechanisms of state. All statism comes out of the Bible, the state was formed by the authority established by the Holy Bible.

you wouldn't let creepy jews babysit your kids why do you let they make your laws

The killer state is the creation of the killer Jew, the Jew got in your head with his book and then rules politically because the Jew first made a beachhead in your mind about God and government. The result is the present day world, where the Jew has successfully organized the Western Nation States as an arm of Judaism, where the United States of America is but a vassal of Israel and power mad Jew ethnically cleansing the Middle East.

THE UNITED STATES HAS KILLED 55 MILLION SINCE THE END OF WW2

But what if there is no external authority to self? Have you ever even considered that, have you ever even tried to visualize a life without the state, a life without an EBT card (food stamps), or regulations on home building or driving permit free on public roads? Life outside the Jew is freedom. Life without the Jew is a free and prosperous society.

Many Jews from around the world have moved to Israel only to experience horror of the total state. Marriage and divorce in Israel is a nightmare based on their testimonies. So if Jews in Jewlandia hate the experience then why would any non-Jew want to live under the thumb of Jewish law? All of this horror stems from one fallacious idea, that someone outside of the self has authority over the self, an obvious fallacious claim when you are the only one in control of thy own self.

jews kill and kill and kill because that is how the jewish brain works

Only the Jew or a person who has incorporated Jewish ideas would love the state. The state is really the state of Jewish insanity, where some power mad Jew decided he knew best for you, and was willing to form a state, a group of armed thugs who enforce Jew law. As a result of this, human being have cast all self responsibility aside, and do whatever because their is a higher power in charge.

So life outside the Jewish brain is life itself. You can not be living when awaiting death and to be with the Jew savior god, you can not be really living when you spend every waking moment waiting to be with Jesus, the Jew who never even existed. The Jesus concept is absurd on it’s face since you don’t need salvation from God but from the Jew.

jewish borg children living in the israeli hive

Belief in Jesus makes about much sense as making payments for the Holocaust. Nothing in the Jew Universe is even real, let alone life affirming. So I ask you why do we put up with Jewish myth and Jewish law, and Jewish gods, and Jewish money? It is all death and if we want to live we must find life outside the Jewish brain.

So what we can immediately do is go toward life by stopping with any Jewish thought. Life starts when Jewish programming ends. Want life, then burn the Bible, put the Jew in FEMA camps, ban Judaism. Simple as pie. End the Jew and life begins again.

thom319 #fundie fstdt.com

It has been an established proven fact that there is high correlation between a negative-father complex and atheism.
<snip>

This is why the observation that atheists typically have abusive fathers or an absent/indifferent father can be explained. Often an absent father fosters a strong degree of cynicism in the individual.

An atheistic outlook is also compounded by the fact of the nature of relation of the Ego to the unconscious, where the Ego is born from. The Ego IS consciousness and the self-awareness that it brings. The Ego can very easily fall into its own trap of thinking that not only is it sole authority in the psyche, it is the only occupant of its house. This however has been empirically proven as untrue in psychodynamic theory. It is not the only occupant.

And I use theory in the original Greek context, theoria, a beholding or a contemplation of the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another. Interestingly enough, theoria is where we get theatre from, "to make apparent".

<snip>

Without elaborating more at this little time I have to comment, when the Ego rebels against the inner God-image, the Self, that it was born from, the Self will cause a myriad of symptoms of sickness, neurotic symptoms such as anxiety, depression, phobias, obsessions, compulsions, suicidal fits and so on which will be perceived by the Ego as punishment at best, or projected as oppressions coming from "outside".

Ayo Kimathi #fundie waronthehorizon.com

Black Brothers and Sisters worldwide, it’s time for a change! The Black Race is the oldest, strongest, wisest, and most beautiful Race of people this planet has ever known. And it’s long past time that we become a living reflection of who and what we are by nature – Righteous Rulers. We may not be perfect, but at our best we are certainly the closest thing we can imagine to being so.

It’s time to pick ourselves up and race towards greatness. We have no more time for pity, self-doubt, depression, laziness, and/or backwardness. It’s time to shed the skin of self-hatred and Racial suicide. It’s time to stand strong for Afrikan/Black culture and create a world that our children can feel safe in. It’s time to purge our communities of european sexual insanity. We have to educate our youth to move from the bottom of the global Racial hierarchy to the very top.

Our great leader and eternal ruler of Afrika, the Most Honorable Marcus Mosiah Garvey, told us that we would see him again in the world wind. And that world wind is here. His vision and goal of an internationally-unified Race of Afrikan people is right around the corner. The seeds of global Afrikan unity are blossoming and this generation of Race men and women will not allow anything to stand in the way of our movement for power and Black Racial dominion.

Listen to the inspirational words of President Yahya Jammeh of Gambia in West Afrika as he fights for the rise of his nation. In this particular instance, he is an example to all Afrikan leaders and people worldwide of what the 21st Century is supposed to look like for Black people.

This is just an early example of what the 21st Century will look like for Black people. We are going to repair the relationship between the Black man and woman worldwide. Black men will fight to gain the respect of our women and children. Black women will become the world examples of dignity, self-respect, beauty, intelligence, etc . . . Black children will outpace every other Race of people on this planet in technology, building infrastructure, food production, entertainment, economic development, and military warfare.

And in 2015, an international movement that will capture the imagination of every decent Black man, woman, and child on this planet will sweep through this planet. 2015 is the year that the Straight Black Pride Movement (SBPM) will become the movement that shapes the future of the Afrikan world. Under this banner, we will triple our population before the close of this century and be in position to protect the interests of Afrikan people worldwide.

This is a movement designed to synthesize the interests of Black people worldwide in a tangible and meaningful way. There are (3) pillars that mark the criteria for involvement:

1. You must be a heterosexual (straight) Black person who is definitively against “homosexuality”, pedophilia, bestiality, etc . . .

2. You must be a Black person whose mother and father are Black. Mulattoes cannot be actual members of this movement.

3. You must be proud of your Afrikan heritage and your Blackness and demonstrate this pride in your behavior.

VladTheImpaler #conspiracy abovetopsecret.com

I support the New World Order/Global Elite!

Hello,

I would like to voice my support for the ‘Global Elite’ and the New World Order, should it exist.

I cannot say I have spent too much time researching the conspiracy theory in regards to the New World Order. I’ve read that the Global Elite plans to exterminate and kill 80% (4 out of 5) people in the world.

Now, after reading this, I must say, what a wonderful idea!

In my opinion there are too many undesirable groups in the world that I my self would be pleased to get rid of.

To start I would like to plead to the ‘Global Elite’ that those whom believes in Jesus Christ (imaginary) to be at the top of the “not needed” list. This is by far the most annoying [religious] group in the world, ever. People whom delude themselves into believing the teachings of the bible without scepticism are lost and I’m simply tired of listening to their fallacious arguments. Oh and the Jews aren’t needed either.

Second, let’s get rid of the entire Islamic population. Although not as annoying as Christ believers, they are certainly very dangerous to the world peace as the very holy book its self clearly describes that killing non-believers is justified. This fact makes it rather difficult to establish any sort of permanent peace with this fanatical group (reference the Middle East).

There are several other religious groups we can really be without, but if we can eliminate the above two the world will be a much better place. Therefore I’d like to request to the Global Elite that you kill Atheist last.

Thirdly, we really don’t need racist (which I define as a person whom finds himself superior simply because of skin colour), homophobes (education and the removal of religious groups such as Christianity should take care the majority of these), people whom voted for George W. Bush (Atheist or not), and finally intolerant assholes like my self (no wait =’( ).

Who wants to start a New World Order fan club?

This is simply my modest opinion; I am in no way saying I wish to kill members of the above religious groups (I don’t want to kill or harm anyone, seriously). I’m just saying I want someone else to do it for me.

Mike King #fundie tomatobubble.com

THE ODD PARADOX OF THE 'HIGH IQ' LIBERAL

*************

The most obvious answer to the paradox of 'high IQ liberals' is that Universities, and even High Schools, have become infested with liberals/Marxists who miseducate their students. Though certainly true, the psychological roots of the mental disorder known as 'liberalism' run much deeper than these superficial intellectual causes.

*************

During the formative years, children are praised for parroting back their ABC’s and 123’s. At an early age, the child’s delicate mind is already being conditioned to equate obedient regurgitation with praise, love, and self worth.

The brightest young learners are singled out to receive the most praise. Proud parents enthusiastically reinforce the praise of the teacher, showering the impressionable child with hugs and kisses. The inflation of the intelligent child’s ego, and the reflexive association of regurgitation with rewards, (including parental love!) are taking root.

With subjects such as reading, writing, and math, the system of obedient regurgitation and praise is a necessary and effective model of teaching. That’s because the ‘3 R’s’ are what they are. They cannot be distorted.

But with subjects such as History, Philosophy, Economics, Current Events, Political Science, and ‘Environmental Science’, the regurgitation / reward model leaves the student vulnerable to manipulation and erroneous information.

The ego-gratification associated with the regurgitation & praise model is reinforced throughout Middle and High School. It is during this time that the, ‘gifted & talented’ students are separated out from their ‘inferiors’ and taught to repeat such rubbish as:

•America’s Constitution is outdated.
•Karl Marx was a great philosopher.
•The Civil War was about slavery.
•FDR’s New Deal saved America.
•Germany started 2 World Wars.
•6 Million Jews were gassed in ‘The Holocaust’.
•Picasso was the greatest artist.
•Einstein was the smartest man who ever walked the face of the Earth.
•Senator Joe McCarthy was evil.
•Martin Luther King was a Saint.
•Capitalism is about greed.
•Socialism is about charity.
•Men and women are the same.
•There is no such thing as race.
•Man ‘evolved’ from pond scum.
•Global Warming is a proven fact.
•There are no government conspiracies.
•Homosexuality is normal.
•Guns and religion are evil.

Note: Many 'conservatives' also hold some of these views. We'll address them in another article.

The next big ‘doggie-treat’ for the young ‘straight A’ parrot, comes when she is accepted to a ‘prestigious’ University. Now she knows that she is really smart!

At college, the star student continues (to his benefit, and to his credit) to regurgitate the complex material of challenging subjects such as physics, engineering, statistics, calculus etc. However, he may also obediently regurgitate the Marxist crap contained in other subjects (electives). Because he has never had cause to question the undeniable veracity of the math and science content presented to him, why would he question what any other textbook or teacher tells him?

By now, the bright young scholar has been so psychologically conditioned that he is incapable of distinguishing between the fact based regurgitation of the objective courses (math, science, etc.), and the propaganda based regurgitation of the subjective courses (electives, humanities, etc). His ego is literally addicted to the praise/good grades of whatever godlike Marxist Professor is instructing him. The hard-earned (and expensive!) diploma represents the ultimate doggie treat and confirmation, in his mind, that he knows it all.

Taught to believe that ‘educated’ people read The New York Times, attend Modern Art exhibits, and watch Bill Moyers on PBS, the trendy post-Graduate libtard’s belief system is further reinforced by the Marxist Media culture.

When challenged on his belief system, the ‘educated’ libtard’s entire self worth is suddenly threatened. Telling him for example that Global Warming is a bunch of Marxist hooey is the equivalent, in his reactive mind, of saying that 2 + 2 is not 4! Because his bloated ego simply cannot bear the discomfort of being out-of-sync with the 'in crowd', the miseducated libtard will despise you, and insult you. His mental disorder runs deeeeep!

Should you press the issue with facts and hard data, watch the oh-so 'tolerant' and 'open-minded' libtard really come unglued! He will verbally attack you in a personal way, accuse you, vilify you, privately wish death upon you, and ultimately, run away from you.

The ‘educated’ libtard is merely an advanced Pavlovian show dog. Through years of studious regurgitation and positive reinforcement, he may have learned to design bridges, repair mangled bodies, program software, build companies from scratch, or design rockets. But he has never been taught the lesson of humility! He knows not how to philosophize – to think his own thoughts – to understand the world - to understand the inner nature of man - to be his own man. And his tragic 'hard wired' arrogance (insecurity) will prevent him from ever trying to.

RippedRichAndIncel #sexist reddit.com

Are Incels the most reviled members of society ever?

(TL:DR below if required)

Inceldom is not something those under its banner can control, any more than a breast cancer patient should be lambasted for letting herself get sick, and yet, only the former is subject to hatred and ridicule of such a kind as deemed, not only permissible, but encouraged.

Throughout history, there have been many examples of oppressed and reviled peoples, so let's take a look at a few and compare them to the plight of the incel.

Women

The normie favourite. Truly women have suffered unfairly throughout history, right? Surely they're still unequal today and in need of the mighty fist of feminism to even come close to man's privilege, right?
Currently, in first world countries, there is no group more privileged than woman: to suggest a biological difference between the sexes means you're a misogynistic pig. Criticism of any kind, if directed at a woman, is rendered not only moot, but considered to be a vitriolic attack of society's special sneauxphlakes.

There is an expectation that women deserve to be treated better than men, which is propogated by both men and women alike: men should always hold the door open for women; men are expected to pay for dinner; men are expected to be the providers for the family (if women want to work, they're encouraged, but men receive no such encouragement, it's merely expected of them); women are viewed as innocent and preferential in legal disputes (97% of alimony payments are made by men, women win exclusive custody 79% of the time, and women who make false rape claims are believed in spite of the notion that the accused should be considered innocent until proven guilty.)

How about the historical treatment of women? Traditionally, women have also been coddled by society. When men were required to hunt and kill to supply for small hunter-gatherer societies, women were spared from this and left safety away from any danger. Up until very recently, women were also spared from the horrors of war (despite Hillary's absurd claims) it has always been the duty of men to defend, en mass, the rights and safety of their women back home. Women have historically been treated well, even in great societies like ancient Greece where men recognized women's inferiority and preferred the company of other men, women were treated well and respected, many members of Greek society worshiping the female gods more than any other.

And in spite of all this; in spite of every advantage afforded to them, women still want more. Now, in front of the wall street bull, a little girl stands defiant. Why? As a symbol of strength against a non-existent wage gap. Society propogates a myth to make women feel better, and then builds upon that myth with symbols of strength to make women feel better still. Clearly, then, women are not so disadvantaged.

The blacks and the Jews

The two Oppression All-stars. There can be no denying that western countries have, historically, treated black people poorly. Colonialism and the ensuing slavery were clear and systematic breaches of the human rights of millions of people.

However, slavery is not exclusive to blacks. In fact, blacks were very often either the sellers, or the buyers of slaves. The word slave refers, originally, to the slavic people who were frequently forced into slavery in the middle ages. Slavery is not and was not exclusive to blacks, and yet, it is blacks who benefit from its having happened.

Affirmative action is hugely prevalent in America. Black students receive black-exclusive scholarships and receiving greater encouragement and support than non-black students.

Of course, racism existed beyond the abolishment of slavery, and still exists today. However, there have always been those who have stood up to racism. Most famous of all was Martin Luther King Jr who is universally praised for his work helping African-Americans, but he is not alone. Many people have dedicated their lives to helping blacks, some have even lost their lives in so doing: but no one has done this for incels. Incels, in spite of the hatred and discrimination they receive, are not beneficiaries of support or affirmative action in anyway. Imagine the response you would receive by going to /r/peopleofcolour and telling them they deserve to be hated or discriminated against. You would be banned sightwide for extreme prejudice, and yet, to do the same on /r/incels is considered amusing and fair. There are clear correlations between height or attractiveness and success, and yet society turns a blind eye to incels' plight. So while it is the case that African-Americans were the object of much discrimination, there has been a significant reversal and now much is done in their favour. Incels, however, are recipients only of hatred: no one wishes to aid their cause.

Likewise, the Jews and their oppression in Nazi Germany might be a favoured counter-argument to the assertion that incels are the most universally reviled societal group, however, this argument falls flat as well. It is of course true that the Jews were systematically despised and considered sub-human. This fact they share with incels.

However, there is a clear difference: When the Nazis considered the Jews sub-human, the world went to war to defend them. When the world considers incels to be subhuman, people just laugh at their plight and go on, encouraging their subhuman treatment. It is clear then which of the two is the more systematically despised.

Other [mental] illnesses

Inceldom, like race or sexuality, is genetic. If it can be resolved by weight loss, or lifting more, it's not inceldom: it's volcedlom. True inceldom is incurable and predetermined.

However, inceldom is not treated the same way as other illnesses at all. Let's take a close look at the subtle distinctions in societal treatment.

Cancer is, in many of its forms, impossible to prevent with the decisions one makes. I'm sorry normies, but that means you can't tell poor Timmy to shower his tumor away. People that suffer from cancer are praised for their bravery; they are the beneficiaries of myriad charities, as well as the objects of ad campaigns and propaganda. Just like inceldom, cancer is a terrible disease, but only one of the diseased individuals will receive love and compassion while he suffers; the other will be taunted as he suffers in solitude.

Furthermore, if we look at how people, reddit especially, treats depressed people, we see an even cleared example of the double standard that derives from pure hatred of incels. Can you imagine the fervent rage that reddit would unleash if someone told a depression sufferer to 'just stop being sad'? And yet, that is the advice incels receive daily. We suffer the same, and yet, while others are supported, we are condemned.

TL:DR - plz read, it's not like you're too busy banging sluts. If you are: Incels might just be the most universally hated and discriminated against members of society. In spite of this, and where other hated sects have been assisted, incels are ridiculed and hurt further for merely existing. There is no help because they are deemed unworthy of it. It is not seen as noble to fight for incels rights as it might to fight for the rights of women or minorities, so we must suffer, because to propagate our suffering is seen not as cruel, but as just.

(Emphasis original)

2016 FSTDT Awards

Nominees and Candidates

The Nominations #announcement fstdt.com

Here are the candidates and nominaitons for the 2016 FSTDT Awards!

Thanks to everyone who made nominations! Also special thanks to my husband and Pharaoh Bastethotep for their help doing tl;dr snippets of the quotes

When casting your votes on quotes — for either a Fundie of the Year candidate or for a Quote of the Year nomination — remember that the snippets provided here are intended to be a convenience giving you a general gist of what the quotes are about. If you decide to vote for a particular quote, then you should first click its quote-number link and read the original quote in its entirety to make sure you don't have any second thoughts. It is also a wise idea to consider your second pick as well and read its full quote too before casting your final vote: if you change your mind after voting, your vote will not get to change with it. All votes are final with the exception of typos or similar errors. If you find yourself equally torn between two or more candidates, then you should definitely always read their full quotes before deciding!

You don't have to cast a vote on everything up for vote. You may abstain from as many or as few things as you like, but remember that you lose your abstained vote; you cannot use it as an "extra" vote somewhere else.

—

[font=sans-serif]Religious fundie of the year[/font]

• David J Stewart – #122928: Leviticus selectivity, shellfish ok, gehs bad
• Sassy – #122088: "I flew in a plane what is different between that space and the space higher up? Where did Jesus go to when he was seen ascending into heaven? If Space is above the clouds where is heaven? You see there is a difference between Man and God the heavens above and heaven"
• cmdrjones – #121628: "Atheists have constitutional rights by being citizens, but by denying the existence of a creator no one with two brain cells to run together would trust that they would respect anyone else's rights. So, they simply should never be afforded political power... What with their miserable track record and so on. "
• kingjameswriter1965 – #122435: "Now they claim they can use this hadron collider to bring forth the Devil and all his fallen ones."
• Mack Major – #118255: "People who come from a voodoo or an old southern hoodoo background know about spirit husbands. These are actual spirit entities that become attached to a woman through ungodly sexual and spiritual activity."
• Catholic Nationalist – #117704: "Catholicism is objectively the coolest religion. So cool in fact that the word cool is not nearly sufficient. What other religion allows you to literally eat God every day?"
_

[font=sans-serif]Right-wing fundie of the year[/font]

• Abolish Abortion Florida – #121877: "The political committee Abolish Abortion Florida (AAFL) has launched a ballot initiative to amend the state's constitution to punish abortion as capital murder."
• Donald Trump – #122148: [Donald's twitter tirades are, mercifully, already auto-summarized by Twitter's 144-character limit, but they are too numerous to list; we'll do a short vote on picking one if he wins. –shy]
• Jim (Jim's Blog) – #120562: "We should protect our gays from Muslims and kill them ourselves."
• Roosh Valizadeh – #120431: "Punish Trump haters with your cock: Besides the punitive element of withholding your cock from a Trump hater, we can also look at it from a time-saving perspective. If you are masculine, you simply won’t connect naturally with a feminist who hates Trump."
• Students Against a Democratic Society – #116770: "We’ve done slavery (Issue 3), we’ve done lynching (Issue 11) – well, we haven’t done them, but you know what I mean."
• The Last Trump – #118465: "[Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Virginia Transboy Who Sued School District to Use Men’s Restroom] THIS, is one of the biggest issues of our time!? Sort of reminds you of Nero fiddling while Rome burned doesn't it?"
• Vox Day – #121392: "TL;DR: The Alt Right is a Western ideology that believes in science, history, reality, and the right of a genetic nation to exist and govern itself in its own interests."
_

[font=sans-serif]Left-wing fundie of the year[/font]

• nikkipotnik420 – #120947: "You defend trans 'women' because its just another way for men to force women to coddle males and put them before our own needs and its transparant as fuck."
• Mark Carey, et al. – #117469: "Feminist glaciology is rooted in, and combines, both feminist science studies and postcolonial science studies to meaningfully shift present-day glacier and ice sciences."
• Johan Nygren – #118613: "Diagnoses are the contemporary equivalent of racial biology. [...] It’s ADHD and bipolarity and schizophrenia and autism was used to legitimize wage slavery"
• University of Capetown Students – #122204: "They believe that [...] you are able to send lightning to strike someone. So, can you explain that scientifically" [Response: "It's not true."] "What you're trying to do is collapse the space and make it antagonizing, which we will not allow. This is a progressive space for people to say their opinions."
• National Union of Students – #118198: "The National Union of Students’ LGBT Campaign has passed a motion calling for the abolition of representatives for gay men – because they 'don’t face oppression' in the LGBT community."
• Aysegul Gurbuz (Labour Party Moonbat) – #118102: "If it wasn't for my man Hitler these Jews would've wiped Palestine years ago. Sorry but it's a fact. [...] Not hating on Jews btw"
• Bailey – #117389: "It’s not irresponsible behavior to not tell someone you have hiv [...] It’s not irresponsible to have sex with somebody without telling them."
_

[font=sans-serif]Conspiracy theorist of the year[/font]

• GLP Anonymous Cowards – #122457: "DO NOT GIVE IN AND MASTURBATE BEFORE THE ELECTION. It will lower your core energy to the lower chakra levels where that the demonic scum need the population to reside in for their ritual magick to be effective."
• Nicolas Maduro – #123066: "He added that the situation is an attack by Colombian criminal groups and Venezuela's MUD opposition coalition "combined with international mafias via an NGO hired by the US Treasury." [...]The NGOs, according to the official, hire criminal organizations to move 100-bolivar bills, the largest bill in circulation now, to Colombia and from there to other countries, such as Switzerland, Poland, Ukraine, Spain, Germany and the Czech Republic, where the money is stored in large warehouses."
• Alex Jones – #118606: "I’m pro-human so I say, black people, especially, stop killing your kids and get them in church, whatever, take them away from Beyoncé, who wants to eat their brain with the CIA, literally."
_

[font=sans-serif]Sexist of the year[/font]

• nikkipotnik420 – #120947: "You defend trans 'women' because its just another way for men to force women to coddle males and put them before our own needs and its transparant as fuck."
• sexselector – #101724: "Pain should never be considered a part of life. Being in pain is not a good evolutionary strategy. [...] Men’s choices in the patriarchy *created* women’s pain."
• Matt Forney – #117165: "It’s time to stop beating around the bush: feminists want to be raped."
• Saint Elliot – #122565: "The pussy of females can be used even 2 days after their death. Their sexual resources get wasted with the current system and people often die because there aren't enough organ donors."
• David J Stewart – #120671: "If your husband wants his cereal in a certain bowl or wants you to wear a certain dress in public... JUST DO IT! If your husband wants you to rinse his glass for 15 seconds or asks you to roll his socks into a ball... JUST DO IT! If your husband wants more grain in his meals... JUST DO IT! If your husband doesn't like the smell of certain foods when you cook them... then DON'T DO IT! If your husband wants you to put the twist back onto the loaf of bread... then JUST DO IT! If your husband wants the toilet seat up at all times... then JUST DO IT! It may not seem fair to you but it is YOUR JOB ladies to HELP your husband."
• Vox Day – #117889: "If the definition of rape is stretched so far to include women who have not given consent, then I am absolutely a serial rapist. So, too, is every man I know."
• Navigator – #123052: "Rape should be legal. It is this simple. A woman is a sexual object."
_

[font=sans-serif]Racist of the year[/font]

• James Laffrey – #116723: "The jews say Adolf Hitler ordered a 'Final Solution' of extermination of the jews. But Hitler, a humanitarian, a vegetarian, an artist, did no such thing — although, again, he should have."
• Wotans Krieger – #117230: "In the Reich that is to come these bastardised noble familes will have no place of honour for they are enfeebled distortions of the once racially pure Germanic aristocracy. Thus we must begin again the restoration of the caste system. Building on the vision of the Rigsthula I propose that these reconstituted castes [...] The Rigsthula makes it clear that this caste was an alien one. The very presence of the Thrall in our lands represents a very real threat to our biological survival as a racial community. Some of these Thralls may outwardly appear to be people of our own blood but the obese, the sexual degenerate, the drug addict, the alcoholic and the career criminal should be regarded as part of this slave under class and the necessary corrective measures undertaken. They are the Untermenschen much prized by the liberal elite."
• Janet Bloomfield – #117222: "Don't ban [the burka]. Use it to pick the next one to deport. #MakeAmericaGreatAgain #WhyWomenShouldNotVote"
• Vox Day – #121315: "As it happens, the ruination of the United States is the result of the 'contributions' of two groups of immigrants, Irish and Jewish."
_

[font=sans-serif]Single-issue wonk of the year[/font]

David J Stewart: Creepy-ass Taylor Swift fixation
• #123073: "This perverted screenshot of Miss Swift to the right only appears in this 3:54 minute video for ONE SECOND TOTAL!!!"

Mack Major: Witchcraft and the Occult
• #122812: "The biblical word for medicine in the New Testament is pharmakeia: and it means SORCERY. In other words witchcraft, occult power, black magic and potions. Why would Jesus Christ expect His followers to rely on the power of witchcraft or black magic to save them???"

Navaros: God's Holy Righteous Penis
• #121503: "You will have to face HIM in ALL of HIS MALE PATRIARCH KING FATHER HOLY RIGHTEOUS PENIS-OWNING GLORY!"

Ann Barnhardt: Made-up fundie disease "Diabolical Narcissism"
• #122361: "Diabolical Narcissism is of the most severe variety, what we refer to as “psychopathy”, and thus she [Hillary Clinton] is an Alpha Narcissist, very much desirous of personal power, all the way up to the national and even global level."

WorldGoneCrazy - Anti-abortion crusader
• #120192: "All I know is that if fetuses could defend themselves with a gun, there would be no abortions."

Vox Day - Evolution denialism
• #120508: [Eric Hovind is refuted by a sixth grader] "t is a form of intellectual combat where the goal is to discredit the interlocutor. [...] Frankly, I'd be surprised and a little disappointed if I didn't have the kid in tears and questioning his faith in science within minutes after asking such a pair of stupid questions [...] Destroy the interlocutor."
_

[font=sans-serif]Vulture of the year[/font]

• #122859: Mack Major – "Someone may ask 'Why are you using this tragedy to promote your ebook?' The simple answer is because it saves lives! Hate to say I told you so, but had those who were partying read my ebook, they most likely would not have been there in the first place [at the Oakland warehouse fire]"
• #119803: crunchymama – "My heart is heavy over every aspect of this. that some of those killed were believers[...] that everyone involved turn to Jesus, that our 2nd Amendment rights aren't taken away"
_

[font=sans-serif]Batshit-insane person of the year[/font]

• usachinanukewar, #117354: "This divine pneumonia time bomb in my lungs implanted by Jesus years ago is the best ever gift I’ve received from Jesus."
• ComeOnPeople, #122200: "I know longer believe what the government told me about the world. To me they have taken the biblical account and turned it upside down. Making everything revolve around the sun, which is contrary to what the bible says and what scientists and historical artifacts claimed up until nasa."
• Vox Day, #119003: "War destroyed the body, but it did not destroy the spirit and the soul in the way peace and prosperity have."
• Joe Eigo, #116613: "His sword cuts through what NEEDS to be TRANSMUTED by Lord Zadkiel of The Violet Ray which is the Ray OF TRANSMUTATION AND MERCY AND ALCHEMY. Lord Michael comes along FIRST and TRANSFORMS IT (IN EASIER TERMS ,CHOPS IT ALL UP (NOT RIGHT TERM) AND LORD ZADKIEL LAUGHED WHEN HE SAID LORD MICHAEL LEAVES HIM THE "MESS TO CLEAN UP WITH THE SWORD OF VIOLET FLAME HE WIELDS OF TRANSMUTATION.WE ARE IN THE VIOLET RAY AGE RIGHT NOW. THE AQUARIAN ONE. IT'S THE 7TH RAY."
• Saint Elliot, #123058: "Heck, I even considered having sex with a dog cadaver that died outside my window but sadly the janitor threw it away before I could go out and get it at night."
_

[font=sans-serif]Funniest quote of the year[/font]

• #106783: "We will use your leaning tower of pizza to throw off homosexual"
• #120864: "Of course, [FSTDT commenters] are all socks of Valri, so the logistics are not too difficult. :-)"
_

[font=sans-serif]Nightmare fuel quote of the year[/font]

• #119250 (Ryon Travis sov-cit house of horrors)
• #120032: "Recent discourse on child pornography falsely portrays it, like child sex in general, as a disaster for the child. [...] Yet there are many children seen in child pornography whose words, facial expressions, body language, and orgasms show that they thoroughly enjoy the sexual activity, sometimes enjoying it immensely."
_

[font=sans-serif]One-liner of the year[/font]

• #122830: "You don't know how much you should fear Jesus"
• #119953: "If I could be in the bedroom of every pro-choicer's when they have sex just to talk to them, I would. I could make them see how beautiful life actually is."
• #121425: "Beware the beast Hildabeast Clinton and her Vagenda of Manocide"
_

[font=sans-serif]WTF?! quote of the year[/font]

• #122633: "[STEM] Syllabi promote the positivist view of knowledge by suggesting that there are correct conclusions that can be drawn with the right tools [...] the syllabi reinforce the larger male dominant view of knowledge as one that students acquire and use to make correct decisions."
• #123064: "[Beezow Doo-Doo Zopittybop-Bop-Bop] explained that his first name represents 'the explosion of awareness of the interconnectedness of the infinite love in the universe.' Doo-doo 'is the struggle of our daily lives with that awareness, that with love comes chaos,' and Zopittybop-bop-bop 'is the outcome of that struggle, which is often ironic, especially because all life ends in death.'"
• #120864: "Of course, [FSTDT commenters] are all socks of Valri, so the logistics are not too difficult. :-)"
_

[font=sans-serif]Incel quote of the year[/font]

• #122565: "The pussy of females can be used even 2 days after their death. Their sexual resources get wasted with the current system and people often die because there aren't enough organ donors."
• #121548 "Modern Western women hate respect. They hate consent. They love bloody beatings. They love death. [...] You are the ones who don't see what's wrong."
• #123058: "Heck, I even considered having sex with a dog cadaver that died outside my window but sadly the janitor threw it away before I could go out and get it at night."

[font=sans-serif]Board of the year[/font]

• /r/IncelHeaven
• Return of Kings
_

[font=sans-serif]Commenter of the year (winner!)[/font]

• Hasan Prishtina
_

[font=sans-serif]Troll of the year[/font]

• TimeToTurn
• Anonymous "enlightened seer" (see here for where the madness begins — one can only hope it's a Poe)
_

[font=sans-serif]Conspiracy theory of the year[/font]

• PizzaGate
• The Mandela Effect

Greenriverthriller,deleted,mrtulip,chaosmotor #fundie reddit.com

Backstory: I don't want to get into details, but tl:dr my little sister has been sexually abused by my cousin. This has been happening for about a year and a half - from when she was 12 to 13. My cousin was 16-17 during this period.

Greenriverthriller: "If your sister is happy and fine with it and your cousin isn't going around molesting. You are the only one with a problem here
I know this doesn't fall in line with your obviously passive-aggressive nature, but how about doing eactly what you said? Go up to him and say "Never do this again - I am absolutely serious". It blows my mind the sheer number of people on reddit that can't deal with thier own shit like adults. TL;DR - Man the fuck up, or deal with the fact your little sister has a vagina and wants to use it.
"

Deleted: "Was it consensual? Keep in mind that Albert Einstein married his first cousin. Four years isn't a crazy age gap. Is it actually such a bad thing, or is it just arbitrary societal conventions that tell you it's bad? Is it really bad enough to "ruin someone's life" over it?"

MrTulip: "if it was consensual i don't see why you should be upset, or rather have a right to be. what did they do exactly and why are you so sure it is abuse? some of my female friends had their first sexual encounters at that age and they turned out just fine...


but if a 12 year old decided to have sex with someone older, even my sister, i would be okay with it, yes. as long as it's sure that no abuse is involved. a former girlfriend of mine decided to lose her virginity at the age of 12, seduced a 20-year-old and that was it. i'm okay with that, too.

just because something is against the law doesn't mean it's inherently wrong or immoral."[


ChaosMotor:"If your sister is in love, I don't think you should stand in the way
I don't really see a huge age difference in 13 and 16. Until very, very recently, it was common for men much older than him to marry girls of that age.

What is wrong with a 16 year old and a 13 year old being in love? Please explain without using the term pedophile, seeing as how the time of menarche for the average american female is 11.6 years, so this girl is almost certainly not a child.
Was I a bad person at 17 for being crazy about a 14 year old classmate? I certainly don't think so, and neither did she. I can't think of a reason why anyone would have a problem with it except jealousy or a misplaced sense of overprotective forced childhood morality.

I'm 28 now and have been talking to a 22 year old who likes me pretty well, that's twice the age gap, I must be an evil monster.

edit: It is human nature to be sexually attracted to females who are younger than you, as long as they are of breeding age. That's just life, son.

"

SkinjobCatastrophe #sexist #psycho incels.co

[It's Over] Women are not evil, they are even worse than evil

I have placed a tl;dr at the bottom for your edification if you dont want to ingest this ludicrously verbose wall of text

I am so tired of women. They poison EVERYTHING with their entitlement, terrible attitudes, bullying, lookism, and subconscious manipulating of men. They are so empty and lifeless. They have no soul. You can see it in their eyes - there is nothing there. No passion, no desire, no purpose, no meaning, no morals or even common decency. They are just soulless husks of people. Completely empty, without even the substance of a ball of dust.

If they were truly evil then there would be something to fight against. We could point and say, THERE is the problem! THAT is the source of our suffering, our oppression, that is why we experience the bullshit we do on a daily basis. But there is nothing to women, they are empty, so we cant point at anything.

The real source of our suffering is the men who work on womens behalf - but what is it that women want? Most men dont know what women want and even women dont know what they want. Women say what they want, and then men do all the heavy lifting to make sure that happens, but then what? Women complain and say thats not what they wanted and that men are the source of all their problems. But what are these problems? They are not actually problems, women like these things, many of which women have created for themselves, but then they complain about them and a man rushes to do their bidding like a slave minion.

So women complain about “problems” that they actually like - for example, being given attention for their looks, or as they call it, being “objectified”. Then, men rush to do whatever the women want done. Being men, they are able to listen and follow instructions very well, and so they do exactly as they are told, and then what? The women complain. “All women are beautiful, why havent you told them that they are pretty? They are not just your tools to use for working and, they want to feel pretty and sexually desirable too!”

And then the cycle either repeats, or more often, creates a ludicrously more complex system of interwoven bullshit that soyboys have to keep track of just to appease their female masters. “All women are beautiful! B-but- their looks dont matter! They work just as hard or harder than men! But men and women are equal! Except we need to give them special privileges and help them because they can't do it on their own! But they are strong and can do anything without a mans help!” Etc.

Many would say to blame these men who enable women and do their bidding, and I would agree. But just like everyone on this forum, men want to be with women. Some men are lucky enough to get to be with very attractive women, some can only get with landwhales, and some, like us, are left with nothing. If everyone wants to be with women, how can we do away with these problems?

Many people say that we need a more traditional culture that places women in the position of household caretakers as a requirement and keeps them out of the workforce and any position of power. But in this society, romance and mate competition would still enable womens behaviors. Just as it did even long ago in america and europe or even a very long time ago in ancient greece. Competition over women is a main source of these problems. Men will step over each other and hurt each other to gain access to higher value females. They will subvert, manipulate, and of course directly physically attack other men to win the attention of females. Women like this and encourage it, and we would be directly back to the root problem - men hurting each other and causing wide scale societal problems to appease women.

Let us say that we have a muslim state type society. There women are removed almost entirely from all public interactions. Marriages are largely arranged and many times you cannot even see the woman because of full body and face coverings. But then we arise at yet another problem. Men want to have sex and be with attractive women, of course, so what happens to these emotions and pent up feelings that are hardwired into the brain like hunger and thirst? Well, nothing good, obviously. Muslim states are not known for their peaceful and diplomatic nature. Men are angry and can only cope with other things, even if they have a wife and kids.

A mans sex drive can never be done away with. It cannot be suppressed. It is like thirst or hunger, it will be there until the day he dies. So what is the solution that can make the most people happy and let men finally have sexual contact? Well there is none. At least, there is not a good solution. Nature is cruel and cares nothing about morals or fairness.

Roughly 50 percent of males from the history of the human race likely never mated. Nature is designed to put a few men at the top and leave the rest of the men either fighting for scraps or suffering with nothing. You cant fight nature, its like stopping a hurricane with a fan or melting Antarctica with a space heater. These are not solvable problems.

It would be best if people accepted that the world is imperfect and did the best that we could instead of acting like if we could institute some massive social or cultural change that inceldom would be fixed. I cannot change the nature of humans. It always has been and it always will be over for many men.

When I say women are not evil, they are even worse, I mean that they are responsible, in a way, for an unsolvable problem. They are so empty and lifeless that they cannot be the ones responsible - men are. But even if we were to kill every soyboy and cuck and IT poster, the problem will still exist. Men would fight over women, they would hurt each other for women. All men want sex and female attention/companionship. But women are the source of these problems.

Its as if your only food source was poisoned potatoes. You have to eat them, but when you do they damage your body and put you in great pain. But you can never be not hungry. You will always want to eat them even though you know they will hurt you. You cannot think “these will cause me pain - so therefore I shouldnt want them and I will not be hungry”. You will ALWAYS be hungry if you dont eat, that is all there is to it. And you will always want women even though you know how terrible they are

Although maybe .0000000001% of the world population can take a step back and realize that fighting over women and simping for women is just a terrible idea, most cant. Even super geniuses who design particle accelerators do these things. Even intelligence cant help. Although intelligence has been has been used to solve just about every other problem throughout history, this problem is too much.

Tl;dr ITS OVER

hirayama_ronin & SophisticatedBean #sexist reddit.com

Re: Benevolent Sexism Attractive To Women, Study Shows

(hirayama_ronin)
Just a comment to posters, why post studies without a comment of your own?

The purpose of the following observations is to situate what counts as benevolent sexism, according to the study's authors. The purpose of the study is to meet research into what is called benevolent sexism (the definition of which the authors may or may not agree with), with "parental investment theory."

However, the definition of "benevolent sexism" is eye-watering.

The following is quoted in the article, word for word from the study.

“Hostile sexism (HS) encompasses overtly prejudiced attitudes, whereas benevolent sexism (BS) involves subjectively positive attitudes (e.g., “women should be cherished and protected by men”), chivalrous behaviors, and attempts to achieve intimacy with women.”

Benevolent sexism includes attempts to achieve intimacy with women. This is either an Andrea Dworking-style, "all sex is rape" definition of sexism, that categorically places normal gendered behavior into a politically hostile ghetto (of rape or sexism), or it's a very poorly worded definition on the part of the study's authors.

There isn't a single example of benevolent sexism offered in the introduction that would situate the author's definition. It moves immediately to supposed consequences of BS (a convenient short-hand).

Here are the studies in support of this idea:

Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764-779. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.491

I don't have access to this literature to see how their work grounds this definition.

Here are some examples found in the "Supplemental Materials" section at the end of the study:

Study 1a, BS condition

He feels that, no matter how accomplished he is, he is not truly complete as a person without the love of a woman. He thinks that a woman should be set on pedestal by her man. He is convinced that in general women are more pure than men and they tend to have a superior moral sensibility. Mark thinks that women should be cherished and protected by men. In case of a disaster or emergency situation, he thinks that women should be helped before men.

Study 1a, non-BS condition

He feels that he can be truly complete as a person without the love of a woman, especially if he is personally accomplished. He doesn't think that a woman should be set on pedestal by her man. He is convinced that neither sex is superior with respect to purity or moral sensibility. He thinks that women should not necessarily be cherished or protected by men. In case of a disaster or emergency situation, he thinks that a person's sex should not be a factor determining who is helped first.

Despite the “romantic” undertone, researchers noted, benevolent sexism still reinforces the notion that women are inferior.

In Study 2a, we find BS in how a man might help a woman. The study participants were offered two men, Robert and John, who were identical in every way, except in particular behaviors:

Robert/John and John/Robert are both colleagues of yours. You have got to know them both a bit because you have often worked in pairs with one or the other and you have attended a few meetings and short business trips with each of them. They both look about the same physically and they are both about as competent at their job as each other.

You have noticed that they behave slightly differently at times though. For example, on one occasion when you were attending a short business trip with Robert/John, you had to get from a train station to the hotel where your conference meeting was being held. The taxi had not turned up so you decided you had to walk in order to get there in time. It was December and it was very cold. [BS condition] After saying something about how cold it was, Robert/John took his coat off and gave it to you, even though he only had a thin suit jacket on underneath. On another occasion later that same month, you had been on another short business trip with John/Robert. It was still very cold and you were walking from the train station back to your office and it was about the same distance you had to walk in the cold last time. [non-BS condition] After saying something about how cold it was, John/Robert, who was wearing a thin suit jacket under his coat, did not offer to give you his coat.

Reading into this, I assume "attempts to achieve intimacy with women" means "attempts to charm women (into intimacy) by giving them preferential treatment."

Discussion

What feminism-driven research is attempting to do, which the authors of these studies is disrupting, is to position the preferential treatment of women as politically damaging treatment. This is actually a position I tend to agree with. I personally believe men's preferential treatment of women makes them weaker, lazy, less desperate to achieve success, thus less successful.

The problem is that feminism allows women to problematize the preferential treatment shown to them (turning a prima facie positive into a subtle negative), while benefiting from preferential treatment. It's grabbing resources, attention, and affirmation from men, while punishing men for offering those resources, attention, and affirmation, packaging it up as a form of political oppression (patriarchy), which men are solely responsible for.

Studies like this cut through the nonsense. It says: benevolent sexism may have negative consequences, but it's desired by women:

We propose an alternative explanation drawn from evolutionary and sociocultural theories on mate preferences: women find BS men attractive because BS attitudes and behaviors signal that a man is willing to invest.

If women express this unconscious bias toward BS men, even when they have conscious knowledge of the supposed negative effects of BS upon women politically, feminists can no longer claim BS is a product of male supremacy. It is a joint product of deep reproductive politics, for which women must take their share of the responsibility, as they take their share of the benefits of being placed on the pedestal.

As always,

feminism == equality + pedestal =/= equality.

(SophisticatedBean)

personally believe men's preferential treatment of women makes them weaker, lazy, less desperate to achieve success, thus less successful

Not doing so appears to cause PMS though.

feminism == equality + pedestal =/= equality

I guess we can shorten that to feminism ? equality.

Women will always be on the pedestal because men are hardwired to care for women and women are not hardwired for reciprocity. Instead, they are hardwired to exploit and to be unwilling to settle with a partner of lower rank. (The alternative would also be unstable anyway as a stronger male in her mating pool would be able to threaten her decision if she decided for a weaker male.)

So the patriarchy is exactly a means of counteracting this innate anti-(beta)-male bias; it is basically egalitarianism. It basically artificially makes men more attractive by rituals, affirmative action (e.g. boys-only domains/clubs), strict rank enforcement and economic dependence such that women more likely feel like actually having a valuable/high-status partner. This should also allow women to experience more orgasms in a monogamous society as they orgasm more the higher the economic status and confidence of their partner is. Not doing so should theoretically make monogamous bonds unstable and we are indeed seeing a growing divorce rates. Another prediction is that more men should be rendered unable to impress a woman by their relative socioeconomic rank; and fewer males should be motivated by classical courtship and incentives for achievements of founding a family, both of which should reduce overall reduce cultural drive, which we are likely seeing too (incels, Hikikomoris, opioid crisis; though all of those have an economic component).

Now, one might expect the negative utility listed above might have been canceled out by the utility of an improvement of women's lives, but it looks like feminism has not even made women happier as career-oriented women seem to often find themselves in positions in which they are not very satisfied because they cannot find a satisfying mate or because their career conflicts with motherhood. I also suspect feminism even increases BS, because men are being raised to be so agreeable, intimidated and soft that they fulfill any wishes. There is positive utility in shape of increased economic productivity, but it's questionable to which extent that has actually made us happier. Positive emotion is mostly associated with goal pursuit (cocaine, emphatemine), and as goals are becoming diffuse, gender-incompatible or unattainable, it obviously makes us less happy.

.
.
.

That said, the study posted by OP surprised me since even self-described feminists preferred the explicitly sexist hypothetical male.

Some women are sneaky like that. I think it is a result of the lack of true female-male or female-female competition. We are seeing the same in the lack of true competition due to declining economic growth in the West: things start to become corrupt, improper and sneaky because the free market does not eliminate behavior and assumptions that are misaligned with reality. The raise of bullshit jobs. Women are basically chronically in this position because they are mostly always desired by men for their reproductive organs largely irrespective of their behavior and assumptions. Which does not mean that this expresses in all women to pathological degree or that men do not have their own gender-specific pathologies, but feminism, even though it probably had the intention of improving this has actually made it worse by making men more feminine/agreeable and by eliminating corrective feedback targeted at women.

W. F. Price #fundie web.archive.org

We are supposedly living in an age of merit, where the best rise to the top through a selective process that rewards valuable traits. This so-called meritocracy is often used to explain away our growing economic inequality. Those who make it, you see, just have the right stuff. This idea of merit was largely invented and is fostered by elite institutions, which pride themselves on selecting for what they call merit. Perhaps it’s a relic of Calvinist predestination, in which a member of the “elect” is destined to be graced by God.

While it’s true that having talent, determination and grit still matters a great deal, we ought to take a closer look at the meritocratic process and what traits it professes to value. Additionally, the traits it fosters and its results are important indicators of what these people and institutions call “merit.”

So, what do we find? A notion of merit that has no room for the traditional virtues yet encourages what used to be known as sin. We find a glorification of pride, greed, lust and gluttony, among others.

Using the seven deadly sins as a standard, let’s examine our “meritocracy” and how it measures up:

Lust

Promiscuity, licentiousness and all manner of sexual practices are cherished and valued in our elite institutions of higher learning. Not only are they protected, but often celebrated by students and schools alike. Extramarital sex is seen as a “right,” while traditional marriage is frowned upon and ridiculed.
Gluttony

Gluttony is not strictly about overeating; it also applies to those who do not eat simply, who seek out strange foods, and who have elaborate rituals around eating. The urban trends of shopping at Whole Foods, eating out at chic restaurants frequently, and seeking out trendy foods fits right into the category of gluttony. Obsessive preoccupation with health food is another example, as is binging and purging. Eating disorders are, for the most part, examples of gluttony, and are common among the people of merit.
Greed

This one goes without saying. An important reason people strive to become members of the meritocratic elite is to make more money. They dream of fancy homes in upscale neighborhoods, isolated from the great unwashed. They want to take trips to Paris and Rome, own the newest, trendiest gadgets and wear the finest clothes.
Sloth

Most people who make it into meritocratic institutions are not layabouts, but they do often fail to put any significant work into developing their spiritual/humanitarian side. Instead of striving to become better people, they focus on networking with the powerful, and thereby betray a general lack of sincerity in their contrived humanitarianism. An example of this is the filler “humanitarian” work they do only to pad out their applications and resumés rather than for any real concern for people in need. On the academic side, they have begun to cheat with alarming frequency, which demonstrates a form of laziness.
Wrath

The rage many of our elites feel toward the common American people is all too obvious. Their searing contempt for what they call “ignorant” people, particularly the more humble, religious sort, can manifest itself in almost demonic denunciations and displays of ethnic and religious hatred. This is especially true of feminists, who have an inordinate fondness for hate porn, particularly when directed against those they perceive as part of the “patriarchy.”
Envy

Envy is often what is behind the desire to join the meritocracy in the first place. For many students and finished elites alike, the institutions themselves provide the tools and opportunities to seize that which they covet, and to profit from the losses of others.
Pride

Pride is the foremost of sins, and it is also the defining characteristic of the new elite. They take enormous pride in being elevated above their fellow countrymen, and wallow in this pride to no end. The American meritocracy is, above all, a collection of the very proud, secure in their superiority.

Of course, we can point out sin in all sorts of groups of people, but my little exercise here was intended to get people to think about what it means when we throw terms like “merit” around. There’s no doubt that people who make it to the top usually possess admirable qualities and talents, but when these are put to use in rotten ways, what they call merit is actually meretricious.

I could find it in myself to excuse some of the excesses of the elite if they compensated for them with good works, but because they have rejected what most of us see as virtuous, it’s difficult to find much redeeming about them at this point.

Maggie_T #fundie freeconservatives.com

I detest liberalism/leftism. I feel utter, undiluted, undissembled contempt for liberals. Lazy, self-centered, self-indulgent buggers, every single one of them. They don't want to do anything for themselves. Not even think. They shun responsibility, blame anyone and anything else for their failures. They are slaves to their genitals and call that freedom. They are dangerous for any country they live in. They are the enemy within. And yes, they HATE this country. And don't anyone try to tell me any different. They hate America because she's rich, strong, and powerful. And liberals have been brainwashed into believing that is something to be ashamed of. They want to turn this great country into a pathetic, weak, inconsequential socialist hellhole, like so many European countries nowadays, including their idol, France. Liberals/leftists are the worst thing to have happened to mankind since the Black Death. They are even worse than the Black Death because the latter just killed everyone and put them out of their misery. Leftism grows like AIDS, rotting everything in its path. Leftism is without a doubt one of the worst scourges of mankind.

Tuthmosis Sonofra #sexist returnofkings.com

5 Reasons To Date A Girl With An Eating Disorder

Nothing screams white-girl problems louder than a good old-fashioned eating disorder.* But they’re more than that. Eating disorders have been—quite appropriately—declared a luxury reserved for only the most privileged members of the female race. In other words, the presence of one of the classic eating disorders is a reliable predictor of various socio-economic, cultural, and personality traits in a young woman–features that, in the end, are desirable to today’s American man. In a world where the “retail price” on the typical Western woman continues to skyrocket—while their quality continues its precipitous decline—there are some real gems to be found in the bargain bin.

I’ve dated several girls with eating disorders—in various intensities—and all of these traits have applied to each of them.

*While obesity is, in most cases, also an “eating disorder,” this list doesn’t apply to emotional eaters, food addicts, and fatties with no self control.

1. Her obsession over her body will improve her overall looks.
A girl who spends inordinate mental and physical energy on her looks is rarely fat. If you were to get into a long-term relationship with one of these girls, she’s also less likely to become complacent about her physique over time. Girls like this are usually deft at properly dressing their body type, which translates into a more stylish girl overall. And, because cheap clothing lines—like H&M—are shaped with straight cuts that are less labor-intensive and therefore more inexpensive, they look good in even the cheapest of shit. While they may have a “distorted body image” on the inside, that usually means staying trim and fit on the outside. Let’s not forget that fatties too, in the majority of cases, have a “distorted body image,” but in the unattractive direction.

2. She costs less money.
You can go out to nice restaurants and order take-out with the confidence that your expense on her will be minimal. In most cases, she’ll get a small dish–like a side salad–or just eat a little bit of whatever communal dishes you order. If you’re a hungry bastard, you can even finish off her plate. “Are you going to finish that?”

3. She’s fragile and vulnerable.
The case has repeatedly and persuasively been made that an inflated ego and an unearned high self-esteem are among the most unattractive traits in a girl. You-go-girlist “confidence”—grounded in little more than years of being told she’s a unique and special snowflake for no other reason than she was born female—renders a woman into an insufferable turd who thinks the world revolves around her.
An eating disorder often translates into the direct opposite: a girl who’s modest, fragile, and vulnerable. Instead of having to constantly wrestle with a difficult and obnoxious girl, you’ll be dealing with a tastefully insecure girl, who’s eager to please, and wants nothing more than your approval. She’s quick to apologize for transgressions, and will make the extra effort to see you–instead of flaking on you constantly. This level of vulnerability often brings out the best in men, whose protector instinct can’t help but get activated.

4. Probably has money of her own.
They aren’t too many poor girls with eating disorders. These girls come from money, and often continue to wield that spending power right into their adulthoods. Her instinct to please you will translate into her picking up tabs, coming to your door not empty-handed, or buying you little gifts.

5. She’s better in bed.
It’s a well-known fact that crazy girls are exceptional in the sack. A girl with an eating disorder has just the right cocktail of pent-up insecurity, neuroses, and daddy issues to ensure that your whole building knows every time you’re beating it up.

Say what you will, a girl with a mild-to-moderate eating disorder—that hasn’t excessively marred her appearance—is today’s best-buy in the West’s rapidly plummeting dating market.

Incel Wiki #fundie wiki.incels.info

Welcome to the incel Wiki! Members are encouraged to detail the forums of incels, incel memes, prominent incels, historical events, lingo etc.

Rules:

Do *not* post content violating US/international law, create a page about someone under 18, or post calls to violence or encouragement of suicide

Do *not* post content not available to the public, or sensitive personal information like street addresses, private social media photos, social security numbers, and the like.

Disclaimer: Most things contained in this wiki are meant to be satire. Do not take this forum seriously. It is not your personal politics wiki. If you would like an image or whatever removed, please make note of so on the relevant talk page or for sooner removal PM 'master' in this discord server: link and also leave a message in the server. Incel Wiki is against any form of threatening comments or content, or content violating US/international law. Admins/mods endeavor to monitor & appropriately deal with any such material but can not be online all the time & as such it is members responsibility to act in accordance with the law. As such Incel Wiki takes no responsibility for the actions of others in this Wiki.

INCEL

An, "incel", is someone who has been totally shit on by the world to the point where they are 'involuntarily celibate' for six months or more. Incels are known for being poor, being victims of abuse, living with their parents, having medical disabilities, and spending way too much time on the internet. Many, but not all incels forums, subscribe to the philosophy of the, "blackpill".

Many people make fun of incels for having a victim complex. However it is completely justified for incels to have a victim complex given they are usually ugly or bullied/ostracized to the point of having bad social skills. The same people who tell male incels that they are entitled and whiney, are usually the same people who feel entitled to non-sexual emotional labor of others through government and the same people who tell men they need to express their feelings more. Apparently men are supposed to express their feelings but their feelings are 'invalid' and therefore 'should not be expressed'.

image
Incels are the vanguard of tearing down gender roles

Advice from Normies

Since normies don't like to pair up people anymore, they tell incels it's near 100% incels own fault that they can't find a partner. So they offer self-help "advice". Incels are told by normies that looks don't matter, but normies always are curious about how ugly incels are and assume they don't take enough showers or get enough haircuts. They tell incels to be themselves, but to pick up hobbies they don't like. They tell incels that pick up artists are full of shit but that incels don't have enough 'game' to date rape drunk women at bars 'pick up women'. They tell incels that they are too nice but also that they are assholes. They tell incels that sexual intimacy is not that important, but they themselves buy and/or create movies and songs about how sexual intimacy is one of the most important things in the world and they get upset if they have a few week long dry spell.

They tell incels that sexual intimacy isn't a commodity in a game with a reward, but think of male virgins as "losers" and tell incels that they don't "deserve" intimacy due to their actions.

For an incel, asking advice about dating from a normie is like phoning up a lazy customer service operator for a corrupt company. The operator will say whatever they can to get the customer off the line as soon as soon as possible without care for consistency or accuracy, or witnessing meaningful results born from their 'advice'.

Normies, especially feminist normies will often insist that incels are the correct batch of people not to be partnered up. After all it would make women and society seem a lot more just if that were the case. They will insist that sexual freedom is a sorting mechanism for male feminists and good personalities like OJ Simpson and Jeremy Meeks, and that your local grocery store bagger deserves to be an incel because maybe he went on 4chan once or twice.

image
Normies, when not lying to incels about celibacy being easy, in reality consider going even 40 days without sexual intimacy as complete savagery

Pavana #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

HAARP is a mimic of the human heart's Harp

Ego = ELF. Spirit = Self.

In cause and effect, cause as first thought, world destruction is not just by action, but by the power of thought, word, feeling and intention. Chaos is not cosmic, but by first cause ignorance. The magnetic cosmic energy is interwoven with humans and their planet. Higher feeling and intention produces improved word and resulting actions.

It's the habitual ego itself, the over used survival mechanism, that is the attachment to stubbornness. It senses rising love naturally because it feels the penetrating wave of light. It seeks to maintain control and has a primal instinct in the DNA to its evolved limitations. Collective ego as vibratory ELF is the Demiurge that seeks to maintain control.

The weather, atmosphere and earth are products of thought that intertwine with human and cosmic vibrations. Living in more awareness of the power of thought, grows stronger influence. First thought higher is order in musical harmony.

lowkeylifted #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

My speculation on an interesting topic. (Annunaki, Nibiru, Vril, Nazi Scientists, Wormwood)

I have long sense known about Planet X. I started researching way before the whole 2012 phenomenon, the problem is when people heard about how it was going to happen on (Insert False Date here) they panicked. Which is the normal response of course, then Hollywood makes the movie 2012, which is clearly programming at its finest. All the while we have nasa throwing literally BILLIONS AND BILLIONS into space exploration and cameras, satellites and anything else they want up there. If something is going on theres no doubt NASA knows about it.

If you are of christian faith you will be familiar with the term 'Wormwood' if not here you go.

"10 Then the third angel sounded: And a great star fell from heaven, burning like a torch, and it fell on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water. 11 The name of the star is Wormwood. A third of the waters became wormwood, and many men died from the water, because it was made bitter. (Revelation 8:1-11)"

Some theorize that wormwood actually refers to the plant wormwood which is bitter. I choose to believe otherwise, wormwood is a direct reference to Planet X a.k.a Niburu.

Now why does any of this matter you might ask? Well let me tell you, as you should already know by now the world is literally ran by the Illuminati. Which is an occult group that worships satan. These people are not good people, they don't care about you other than the fact that you make them money by slaving away and barely getting by. Thats how they want it. Lucifer was portrayed as a snake in the garden of eden, what type of animal is a snake? A reptile right?

Now, its understood that nazi germany had lots of breakthroughs in technology, some say this is because of the Vril, a reptilian species that was around way before humans were, they are the ones who truly lived here first. Now lets think about some things here, how in the hell did Hermann Oberth and Wenher Von Braun make some of the most significant jumps in technology before these technologies were even close to being discovered.

Well Hermann Oberth is famously quoted as saying, "we were helped from people from other worlds" How exactly did he know they were from other worlds? They didn't look human of course, they looked reptilian, and nothing reptilian on earth was as intelligent as these beings, therefore he assumed they were from other worlds (planets). How could the German scientists have made such huge aeronautical and technological advances in such a short period of time?

The technologies include; beam weaponry, weather manipulation, both a cold and molecular bomb, ion plasma energy, and the out of this world flying saucer called the Haunbe flying discs. Developed a heavy particle accelerator used to produce pure bomb grade uranium 233.

They had invented the jet engine, guided bombs, and missile technology which were way ahead of the times. Could they have had special help? They did.

Now lets talk about Operation Paperclip, the plan that expunged 500 scientists records after WW2 and relocated them to the USA. The american government had the information and files turned over to them and the scientists continued doing work for the us government.

What does any of this have to do with Nibiru? Well my theory is that the Vril who live underground came FROM Nibiru A long-long time ago, needing something or someone to mine gold and do slave labor they spliced their DNA with the early homonids and created homo sapiens (which in latin mean "wise ones" Because obviously early homonids were not wise like the Vril, therefore they had to give them SOME of their DNA so we could think enough to actually do the work they wanted without rebelling. Not sure if the Vril came here because of overpopulation on Nibiru, or they came here looking for gold and other resources.

That is why I believe in 2016 Nibiru will be back, but before it gets here we will have E.T disclosure and we will be told that our governments have been 'comprimised' by these E.T beings. Which will then be the start of the NWO and the end of times as described in the bible. These E.T's will be the ones who FAKE the second coming of christ and will say that since they are god, we need to take the mark to worship them, a.k.a the illuminati triangle, or maybe the all seeing eye. Whoever doesn't take the mark will be killed . Without the mark you will not be able to do ANYTHING. Buy, Sell, Consume, Own land, anything that is involved with society you will be shunned from. Nasa knows it is coming and they are flipping shit and they want to keep it from you for as long as the sheeple will continue to sheep.

If TL:DR

Nazi scientists are quoted as recieving help from other worlds.
Satan was symbolized as a Snake in the Garden of Eden, Snakes are reptiles, The Vril and Annunaki are reptilian and spliced early homonid DNA to create homo sapiens to do their bidding and worship them. Nibiru will be back and then the world will learn the answer of the biggest mystery in life.

Why are we here?
Who made us?
Whats our purpose?

Get right with god please people.

Now tell me what you think? I actually want to have a decent conversation about this, if you think I am mistaken then lets have a debate.

ShadowTheEdgehog #sexist #crackpot incels.co

RE: [RageFuel] Empathy is a trait of sufferers

Foids, chads and normoids will never understand compassion because they never faced struggle. Chads can say fuck you to anyone and not feel bad in the slightest, but if that chad was always told to fuck off as a child, he wouldn't do it because he know how much it hurts. Suffering = wisdom and understanding tbh

This is why normoids are so fucking evil and selfish.

Yes, they have no humility. That's also why they are so sensitive to being insulted.
Tbh, getting my ass kicked online over the years has actually turned me into a better Person.
That's why self-deprecating Humor doesn't work with normies because they are all narcissists to a Degree.
They simply can't take attacks of their own ego.

Think About it, Society has created an entire sub-Group of self-deprecating People to be Entertainers and we just call them Comedians. That's how incapable the normalfaggot is of self-criticism.

It is another reason why I can't stand non- incel places
Normoids are the most self- centered piece of shit narcissists I've ever seen
It is always about them one way or another, never about anyone else

Yes, they just ping-pong stuff on you, its never really About you as a Person. Even when they praise you, they expect something in return. If a normie praises you and you don't react, they get pissed.
That's why I stopped trusting People early in my Teens, it is just pointless. There is no true altruism with them, they are Always selfish.
They cum in your face and then they expect you to smile jfl

Philosophycel #dunning-kruger incels.co

On Incels Using and Abusing Culture

Incels become more introspective and intelligent than normies on average because the obstacles they come up against demand self-awareness and critical thinking, and when they find they cannot act in the outside world, they retreat into an inner-world of their own making. In cultivating these qualities, they open themselves up to indulgence in culture. Many incels have pretensions to culture, for example, reading Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, reading 'good books', watching 'good TV' and playing 'good videogames', and so on. It is common for incels to accuse normies of lacking introspection, intelligence and a sense of culture by the same measure. While these accusations have merit, we ought to look at why they're being made in the majority of cases. Indeed, it is uncommon for incels to accuse other incels of lacking these qualities, so what is it about normies that calls for critique?

Ultimately, many incels of this nature identify themselves with a higher order, proclaiming themselves above normies and their interests, and therefore looking down on them. They use this in order to comfort themselves by imagining they're too sophisticated to enjoy associating with normies, so thereby they will be isolated by society at large, but critically more self-isolated than before, isolated by choice, voluntarily isolated, and often they will strike out against normie preoccupations from the shadows, like popular videogames, movies, etc. Though the incels genuinely feel as though what normies like is all shit, and perhaps they are right, they anchor themselves to this role in order to make themselves superior to normies, look down on them, and reject them. This is essentially a small incel rebellion as I have envisioned it in my post history. It is an inversion of values that makes out qualities associated with strength and action as crude and cumbersome, while qualities associated with weakness and inaction are made subtle and intelligent. Although the pathology of these incels is that they only integrate themselves with culture to the extent that it allows them to be destructive towards 'the common'. They do not spend their time delving into the intricacies of culture and finding joy in it, and it does not invigorate their activity; it only enables them to tear down the cultural interests of successful and normal people out of pure resentment towards a world and its people that has not answered to their desires, so now they seek revenge against it and those who they're envious of. Many incels who think of themselves as cultured are actually not very cultured for this reason, they're only interested in using culture as a sword and shield.

TL;DR: Many incels become somewhat cultured to cope with not being successful in an 'uncultured world' so they can look down on it and regular people. They use their cultured sensibilities to snobbishly tear down happier and more successful people and their interests because they're resentful towards the world because it hasn't answered to their desires, and they're jealous of many uncultured people for being able to act in the world in ways they've failed to do. Incels enshrine contemplation because they cannot act.

Critical-Rationalist #sexist reddit.com

When no self-actualization process, no higher value and no collective achievements exist anymore because of the collapse of cultural norms, individuals tend to base their whole existence and build their ego around the fulfillment of their animalistic needs. On a biological level, this is what happens when the stress factor is removed from a species; individuals tend to excessively act on their animalistic urges (namely their two fundamental imperatives: sex and eating) and will discard anything that would prevent them from reaching these goals. It's precisely what happened in the mouse utopia experiment. It led mice in the experiment to become violent among males in order to have sex, and led females to have sex all the time, killing their babies, eating other mice and developing deviant sexual practices. In 2018 humans, this leads to abortions on a massive scale, cuckolding and pegging, as well as the end of every cultural norm that would hinder women's ability to act on their animalistic urges. This is why fat acceptance and female sex positivity are a sociocultural necessity for modern females.

The comment of this post is a symptom of this phenomenon. These people deny every cultural norm that allowed every advanced civilization, throughout the world and history, to exist. Virginity is an imperative in order to have proper pair-bonding, and thus a strong family unit that is the basis of human societies. But these people don't think of such things, they just constantly think about their animalistic needs and build their egos and their new culture around them in order to avoid becoming totally insane.

What they don't understand is that incels who post on this subreddit are, for a good part at least, aiming for self- actualization and fulfilled lives. They rightly consider that sex in itself with a whore (be it a prostitute or a modern female that starts to become Chads cumdumps in high school for validation and attention) would not help them achieving what civilized men strive for: self-realization through family construction. Self-actualization through discovering their ability to be a proper provider for a woman who they love and that respects them. An incel resents society because his "looks counterpart" of today will never be able to be such a woman precisely because of their lack of virginity and hence of pair-bonding.

By pushing this sex-positivity and denying the inherent virtue of virginity denying men and women a fulfilled life, degrading everyone in the process, these people destroy lives for selfish and animalistic reasons. They will shame incels for their current subhuman status, but it is them who are leaving humanity.

Critical-Rationalist #sexist reddit.com

image

When no self-actualization process, no higher value and no collective achievements exist anymore because of the collapse of cultural norms, individuals tend to base their whole existence and build their ego around the fulfillment of their animalistic needs. On a biological level, this is what happens when the stress factor is removed from a species; individuals tend to excessively act on their animalistic urges (namely their two fundamental imperatives: sex and eating) and will discard anything that would prevent them from reaching these goals. It's precisely what happened in the mouse utopia experiment. It led mice in the experiment to become violent among males in order to have sex, and led females to have sex all the time, killing their babies, eating other mice and developing deviant sexual practices. In 2018 humans, this leads to abortions on a massive scale, cuckolding and pegging, as well as the end of every cultural norm that would hinder women's ability to act on their animalistic urges. This is why fat acceptance and female sex positivity are a sociocultural necessity for modern females.

The comment of this post is a symptom of this phenomenon. These people deny every cultural norm that allowed every advanced civilization, throughout the world and history, to exist. Virginity is an imperative in order to have proper pair-bonding, and thus a strong family unit that is the basis of human societies. But these people don't think of such things, they just constantly think about their animalistic needs and build their egos and their new culture around them in order to avoid becoming totally insane.

What they don't understand is that incels who post on this subreddit are, for a good part at least, aiming for self-actualization and fulfilled lives. They rightly consider that sex in itself with a whore (be it a prostitute or a modern female that starts to become Chads cumdumps in high school for validation and attention) would not help them achieving what civilized men strive for: self-realization through family construction. Self-actualization through discovering their ability to be a proper provider for a woman who they love and that respects them. An incel resents society because his "looks counterpart" of today will never be able to be such a woman precisely because of their lack of virginity and hence of pair-bonding.

By pushing this sex-positivity and denying the inherent virtue of virginity denying men and women a fulfilled life, degrading everyone in the process, these people destroy lives for selfish and animalistic reasons. They will shame incels for their current subhuman status, but it is them who are leaving humanity.

wayshegoes #fundie incels.co

Love is a normie cope to keep them wagecucking and to stop society from falling

Love is truly the biggest cope in existence. Think of all the things man have done at the hopes of one day finding their 'one true love'. When a man learns the truth (blackpill), he no longer sees the point in wagecucking. Not only is love false, only 20% of the men get 80% of the women. But men are told there is someone out there just for them, this meme is perpetuated from when we are young children through the likes of disney, which love is the main theme in all of the movies.

Would you slave at the office everyday knowing there is absolutely no light at the end of the tunnel? The vast majority of technological advances we have made as a species is because of this concept of finding love. No matter what the normies tell you, 99% of them do everything based on getting a woman. They go to work to get a woman, they try build status to get a woman, they go to the gym to get a woman (JFL at normies who say they lift for themselves). The absolute driving factor behind men who are NT is this notion of true love that has been conditioned into us from birth. This is the sole reason why society has come as far as it has, and why incels want to give up when they learn the truth. There is no reason to continue without the main force which we were told to believe in all these years.

Monogomous societies managed such rapid advances because it was just enough to stop men checking out of society and LDARing. The women gave just enough duty sex, and the man had to work so many hours that they did not have the time to think about sex that much anyway. The nuclear family is a lie, and again part of the propaganda to keep men wage cucking. Its built on the false pretense that firstly there is a woman who will just love us for us, and secondly they can actually love us in the way we desire. The reality is once the kids are out there is no more sex, and the woman completely checks out of the marriage. You just have to provide for her because society tells you to.

We have the cold hard statistics to prove this. Women are disgusted by most men, and they cannot love like we want them to. Imagine if all men woke up and realised this. Without this driving factor society as we know today would not exist. This is why spreading the blackpill could actually be bad for us. At least now normies keep society functioning while we get to laugh at them for the most part, and they make great copes for us.

tl;dr 'love' is the driving force of society. Without it, society as we know it would cease to exist.

SilverStarApple #wingnut deviantart.com

TL;DR: COMMUNISM IS GAY BECAUSE YOU'RE TAKING AWAY PICTURES OF MEN and all other forms of everyone else's property

As an aside: Communists have to ignore Communism's faults and Strawman the current way of life, this eroded-away pseudo-Capitalism with unchecked Deep State corruption and far too much Nanny-state interference, as something purely evil and unfixable because that's the only way Communism can seem preferable to what we have now.

One more thing: Communism killed more people than Nazism. And fuck Communists for making me say this next part, but... Nazism killed the people it wanted to kill: Jews, gay people, non-nazis, and so on. Communism starved and killed and purged its own detractors and its own supporters and its own farmers and anyone else who got in its way or spoke out against it or had the corruption of a higher-up blamed on them or got raped by a communist soldier and shot in the street for it. It was a colossal failure that dwarfed Nazism's death toll four times over. Marx was a retard who bitched about how he felt things "Should" be, even though the proposed methods he and his fans came up with were always stupid, fallacious, and doomed to fail. Marx thought if he ruled the world, he could make everything fair and orderly and "Equal", because he was a prat with an absolutely spectacular ego.

Oh, and the Nazis, the National Socialists, were leftist. Hitler was a far-left failed liberal arts student who blamed all his woes and the world's woes on an ethnicity he deemed priveleged, and he preached this to his followers while violently stamping out opposition and free speech. He went out to purposefully try and scare critics of his dangerously far-left ideology into silence, and he succeeded. When he took over, he went to war over land he felt he was owed. He thought nothing his ethnicity could do was wrong, and everything the "Enemy" ethnicities did was wrong, especially everything the "Evil Priveleged" ethnicity did. He was leftist, the Nazis were leftist, and no matter how hard the SJWs cry "It's Lenin on one side and Hitler on the other! Our enemies are literally Hitler!", it will never magically become truth.

Marxism, Communism, SJWism, Socialism, call it what you like, it doesn't work. It doesn't work, it doesn't create utopia, it just gives power to retards too stupid and ignorant to understand why competition matters or is necessary, why there aren't more than two genders, and why Communism always results in failure. And if anyone should have absolute power, it sure as hell isn't someone like that.

INB4S: (Except they're actually retarded things communists have said after I showed this to them)

Inb4 some butthurt communist decides things that say negative things about communism, such as comics, are not to be trusted because reasons.

Inb4 some butthurt communist decides he/she doesn't have to analyze his/her own belief in communism if he/she pretends he/she instead believes in some mythical perfect mutant strain of Communism beyond the comprehension of non-communists.

Inb4 some braindead communist says "But goodness and equality are inherent parts of communism, the USSR wasn't communist because it wasn't good or equal. Real Communism has never been tried on a large scale uwu"

Inb4 a communist says "But a communist government can't be bad if we democratically elect the communist leaders after violently making the country communist. There's no way a communist power-siezer would ever choose to hold on to power. Or lie to other communists, who always make rational and informed decisions when it comes to votes. Democratic Socialism is the best kind of Communism because we'll all vote on whether we want the bad of communism to come with the good and we'll all vote no and everything will be great!"

Liptusg #sexist reddit.com

"We have nothing against virgins. Also, only a terrible person could end up a virgin."

"We don't hate virgins, some of my best beta orbiters friends are virgins! We just hate those pathetic misogynistic incels who are entitled and blame their problems on whamenz! Work on ur shitty personality"

"The reason I can get face-fucked by 10 Chads on Tinder in a rape-play session is due to my impeccable 'social skills', my vagina's functionality as a moral compass, and the fact that all it takes to get a partner is some basic human decency and hygiene! If you're unable to get a partner, that's because you are fundamentally inferior to me both psychologically and morally in every way possible, otherwise you'd have no problem finding someone"

Normie logic. At every opportunity, they claim to have nothing against the 'normal', PC, left-wing yet non-volcel virgins who do not identify as incels, how much more admirable they are than incels, and so forth, positing that incels are uniquely depraved for the crime of standing up to gynocentric gaslighting. As soon as they are confronted with the fact they are committing a chronological fallacy ( You can't develop "sour grapes" attitudes without experiencing shunning, ostracism and discrimination in the first place ), or whenever circle-jerking themselves about how laughable and absurd the situation of sexually excluded men is, they always inform you that even if you do not HATE WHAMENZ or participate in wrongthinking, and yet still fail to garner even the tiniest shred of sexual attention from women, then clearly the only possible factor you should be considering is that you are an unimpressive, unaccomplished, worthless shitty person who should assign all blame to his own undefined failings ( Women's attraction being the chief authority on these matters ) or else risk the wrath of the matriarchy for even daring to entertain notions like evolutionary biology, hypergamy, macro socioeconomics of sexuality, Sexual selection, published psychological research, and other problematic ideas.

Now, putting the mountain of braindead NPC bullshit and endless documentation ( Including according to women's description of their ex-sexual partners and rants on social media ) about women's incredibly machiavellian and perverse mating criteria which we all know and love, the Mean Girls and their male enablers have clearly backed themselves into the corner of shameful cognitive dissonance with their mindless antiques, given that their mindset extends to all of the supposed token, submissive virgins they profess to have nothing against.

If all you need to get laid or have a girlfriend is some of that muh basic human decency, social etiquette, showers and 'not whining', then what those women and men are saying is that every single male virgin they know of in their life who does want sexual or romantic intimacy must be an indecent, socially retarded, filthy, pathetic, value-less whiny piece of trash. What other reason could there be for them to get rejected for so long? Truly, any 'non-incel' virgin would be lucky to have such fine folk as his friends and family.

But hey, it's cool! Just because I think that the virgins I fraternize with are the scum of the earth and pitiful losers who are worse human beings than any man who's ever stuck his dick in a girl's hole doesn't mean I'm hateful or prejudiced against them! It's uhhh, not the same, you understand. To their credit though, it must be said that some of those 'ex-permavirgin' preacher types do follow up on their own premise - by attributing their past virginity to their own worthlessness and deficiencies as woman-approved humans, which may indeed be a valid observation in their case given how philosophically stunted they are, yet one which unfortunately they project on everyone else and insist on blind adherence to - you're either a self-flagellating virgin, or a world-blaming loser.

For this reason, you find women and normies stammering all over themselves in various subreddits during times of social expediency ( Most of the time though in AskWomen and the like, they'll just launch into a full tirade about how inferior and defective the poster must be, and how good it will be for him to accept that ) to mask the logical extension of their mindsets whenever some virgin man comes prostrating himself before them, prefacing his thread with countless apologies, before expressing his sorrow over not achieving their sexual transcendence. At which point, several damage control first responders might awkwardly come out with the following:

"Teehee, I'm sure there's a right person somewhere, it took me 10 years of College sex partying before I finally met the husband of my dreams! We are alike!"

"Uhhh, errr, durr, emm, w-w-what do you even need to think about sex and relationships for? Just focus on uh.. other things and just..wait...nervous glances

Poster: But I want to know exactly why is that -

"Shut up you piece of shit! You don't want to sound like an entitled whiny incel, do you? Just go participate in more hobby groups and patiently keep your head down until you're magically in a relationship. And don't ever ask any questions about women's decisions ever again."

Of course, none of the answers that any virgin will be getting are going to rationally explain why is it that for the majority of someone's life, no woman ever finds him to be 'her type', nor eager and welcoming to his advances as much as she will be to any crass 'creepy PM' from a Chad on Tinder, for as long as women and normies refuse to recognize the Halo Effect, Gender Dimorphic sexual selection, Dark Triad psychology and overall, the indisputable historical and scientific truth that the correlation between being a Just person, wisdom, and other profound concepts to sex appeal is completely null, and that only a weak correlation exists even for being an interesting conversationlist or 'muh confidence' in comparison to appearance, dominance and power.

And so their only choice is either deflect, deflect, deflect, or own up to the fact that they hold each and every single involuntary virgin they ever met in their life in contempt, as an inferior person and non-decent human being who must be patronized about their flawed and despicable existence as the reason of failing to gain traction with women's base instincts. ( But remember, they love diversity and hate othering of deviant and non-binary social groups ).

You can't have it both ways, friend-o's. You either accept the facts of sexual dynamics throughout human evolution and their amoral, reactionary nature, or you admit just how much toxicity, smug self-superiority and disdain you harbor toward every single virgin on the planet who is not abstinent by choice. Feel free to PM me with justifications too if you want, would love to hear it.

C.E. Carlson #conspiracy rense.com

The French author, Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote Democracy in America when he traveled here in the first third of the 19th Century. In ringing tones he sang the praises of America's invulnerable strength and spirit. He attributed its greatness to its citizens' sense of morality... even with the abundant church attendances he observed in America. De Tocqueville wrote in French and is credited with this familiar quote: AMERICA IS GREAT BECAUSE SHE IS GOOD, AND IF AMERICA EVER CEASES TO BE GOOD, SHE WILL CEASE TO BE GREAT.

De Tocqueville could see the power of America, but he could not have known in 1830 that she was soon to be under an attack aimed at its churches and the very sense of morality that he extolled.

First, there was a War Between the States, which scarred the powerful young nation in its strapping youth. A worse attack on America was to commence near the turn of the 20th century. This was the onset of an attack on American Christianity that continues unabated against the traditional, Christ-following church. This attack, which author Gordon Ginn calls "The final Apostasy," began with a small very wealthy and determined European political movement. It had a dream, and the American churches stood in its way.

The World Zionist movement, as its Jewish founders called themselves, had plans to acquire a homeland for all Jews worldwide, even though most were far from homeless, and many did not want another home. Not any land would do. World Zionists wanted a specific property that American Christians called "the Holy Land." But if these Zionists read "Democracy in America" or any of the journals of any of America's churches, which no doubt they did, they could not help but know that Jerusalem was not theirs to have. As self-proclaimed Jews, they were, according to the Christian New Testament, the persecutors of Christ and most of his early followers, and the engineers of his crucifixion. America's traditional churches in the 19th Century would never stand for a Jewish occupation of Jesus' homeland.

World Zionist leaders initiated a program to change America and its religious orientation. One of the tools used to accomplish this goal was an obscure and malleable Civil War veteran named Cyrus I. Schofield. A much larger tool was a venerable, world respected European book publisher--The Oxford University Press.

The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and promoting a pro-Zionist subculture within Christianity. Scofield's role was to re-write the King James Version of the Bible by inserting Zionist-friendly notes in the margins, between verses and chapters, and on the bottoms of the pages. The Oxford University Press used Scofield, a pastor by then, as the Editor, probably because it needed such as man for a front. The revised bible was called the Scofield Reference Bible, and with limitless advertising and promotion, it became a best-selling "bible" in America and has remained so for 90 years.

The Scofield Reference Bible was not to be just another translation, subverting minor passages a little at a time. No, Scofield produced a revolutionary book that radically changed the context of the King James Version. It was designed to create a subculture around a new worship icon, the modern State of Israel, a state that did not yet exist, but which was already on the drawing boards of the committed, well-funded authors of World Zionism.

Scofield's support came from a movement that took root around the turn of the century, supposedly motivated by disillusionment over what it considered the stagnation of the mainline American churches. Some of these "reformers" were later to serve on Scofield's Editorial Committee.

Scofield imitated a chain of past heretics and rapturists, most of whose credibility fizzled over their faulty end times prophesies. His mentor was one John Nelson Darby from Scotland, who was associated with the Plymouth Brethren and who made no less than six evangelical trips to the US selling what is today called "Darbyism." It is from Darby that Scofield is thought to have learned his Christian Zionist theology, which he later planted in the footnotes of the Scofield Reference Bible. It is possible that Scofield's interest in Darbyism was shared by Oxford University Press, for Darby was known to Oxford University. A History of The Plymouth Brethren By William Blair Neatby, M.A.

The Oxford University Press owned "The Scofield Reference Bible" from the beginning, as indicated by its copyright, and Scofield stated he received handsome royalties from Oxford. Oxford's advertisers and promoters succeeded in making Scofield's bible, with its Christian Zionist footnotes, a standard for interpreting scripture in Judeo-Christian churches, seminaries, and Bible study groups. It has been published in at least four editions since its introduction in 1908 and remains one of the largest selling Bibles ever.

The Scofield Reference Bible and its several clones is all but worshiped in the ranks of celebrity Christians, beginning with the first media icon, evangelist Billy Graham. Of particular importance to the Zionist penetration of American Christian churches has been the fast growth of national bible study organizations, such as Bible Study Fellowship and Precept Ministries. These draw millions of students from not only evangelical fundamentalist churches, but also from Catholic and mainline Protestant churches and non-church contacts. These invariably teach forms of "dispensationalism," which draw their theory, to various degrees, from the notes in the Oxford Bible.

Among more traditional churches that encourage, and in some cases recommend, the use of the Scofield Reference Bible is the huge Southern Baptist Convention of America, whose capture is World Zionism's crowning achievement. Our report on Southern Baptist Zionism, entitled "The Cause of the Conflict: Fixing Blame.

Scofield, whose work is largely believed to be the product of Darby and others, wisely chose not to change the text of the King James Edition. Instead, he added hundreds of easy-to-read footnotes at the bottom of about half of the pages, and as the Old English grammar of the KJE becomes increasingly difficult for progressive generations of readers, students become increasingly dependent on the modern language footnotes.

Scofield's notes weave parts of the Old and New Testaments together as though all were written at the same time by the same people. This is a favorite device of modern dispensationalists who essentially weigh all scripture against the unspoken and preposterous theory that the older it is, the more authoritative. In many cases the Oxford references prove to be puzzling rabbit trails leading nowhere, simply diversions. Scofield's borrowed ideas were later popularized under the labels and definitions that have evolved into common usage today--"pre-millennialism," "dispensationalism," "Judeo-Christianity," and most recently the highly political movement openly called "Christian Zionism."

Thanks to the work of a few dedicated researchers, much of the questionable personal history of Cyrus I. Scofield is available. It reveals he was not a Bible scholar as one might expect, but a political animal with the charm and talent for self-promotion of a Bill Clinton. Scofield's background reveals a criminal history, a deserted wife, a wrecked family, and a penchant for self-serving lies. He was exactly the sort of man the World Zionists might hire to bend Christian thought--a controllable man and one capable of carrying the secret to his grave. (See The Incredible Scofield and His Book by Joseph M. Canfield).

Other researchers have examined Scofield's eschatology and exposed his original work as apostate and heretic to traditional Christian views. Among these is a massive work by Stephen Sizer entitled Christian Zionism, Its History, Theology and Politics, Christ Church Vicarage, Virginia Water, GU25 4LD, England

We Hold These Truths is grateful to these dedicated researchers. Our own examination of the Oxford Bible has gone in another direction, focusing not on what Scofield wrote, but on some of the many additions and deletions The Oxford University Press has continued to make to Scofield Reference Bible since his death in 1921. These alterations have further radicalized the Scofield Bible into a manual for the Christian worship of the State of Israel beyond what Schofield would have dreamed of. This un-Christian anti-Arab theology has permitted the theft of Palestine and 54 years of death and destruction against the Palestinians, with hardly a complaint from the Judeo-Christian mass media evangelists or most other American church leaders. We thank God for the exceptions.

It is no exaggeration to say that the 1967 Oxford 4th Edition deifies--makes a God of--the State of Israel, a state that did not even exist when Scofield wrote the original footnotes in 1908. This writer believes that, had it not been for misguided anti-Arab race hatred promoted by Christian Zionist leaders in America, neither the Gulf War nor the Israeli war against the Palestinians would have occurred, and a million or more people who have perished would be alive today.

What proof does WHTT have to incriminate World Zionism in a scheme to control Christianity? For proof we offer the words themselves that were planted in the 1967 Edition, 20 years after the State of Israel was created in 1947, and 46 years after Scofield's death. The words tell us that those who control the Oxford Press recreated a bible to misguide Christians and sell flaming Zionism in the churches of America.

There is little reason to believe that Scofield knew or cared much about the Zionist movement, but at some point, he became involved in a close and secret relationship with Samuel Untermeyer, a New York lawyer whose firm still exists today and one of the wealthiest and most powerful World Zionists in America. Untermeyer controlled the unbreakable thread that connected him with Scofield. They shared a password and a common watering hole--and it appears that Untermeyer may have been the one who provided the money that Scofield himself lacked. Scofield's success as an international bible editor without portfolio and his lavish living in Europe could only have been accomplished with financial aid and international influence.

This connection might have remained hidden, were it not for the work of Joseph M. Canfield, the author and researcher who discovered clues to the thread in Scofield family papers. But even had the threads connecting Scofield to Untermeyer and Zionism never been exposed, it would still be obvious that that connection was there. It is significant that Oxford, not Scofield, owned the book, and that after Scofield's death, Oxford accelerated changes to it. Since the death of its original author and namesake, The Scofield Reference Bible has gone through several editions. Massive pro-Zionist notes were added to the 1967 edition, and some of Scofield's most significant notes from the original editions were removed where they apparently failed to further Zionist aims fast enough. Yet this edition retains the title, "The New Scofield Reference Bible, Holy Bible, Editor C.I. Scofield." It's anti-Arab, Christian subculture theology has made an enormous contribution to war, turning Christians into participants in genocide against Arabs in the latter half of the 20th century.

StAliaHarkonnen #sexist reddit.com

self-respecting women would never have sex

Of course women had to evolve to be able to have sex and to get pregnant, so self respect isn't really in their nature. In fact, just read any topic on sex, you'll find most women are masochists who just want to be dominated and treated like sluts. They try to distance themselves from that in real life by calling it kinks and then pretending kinks should never be judged, but kinks don't exist in vacuum. in fact they speak volumes about a person's character, and in this case, character of a whole gender.

Just the nature of sex is such that female body gets penetrated and no matter how much women like to pretend that they need and love sex just as much as men do, it is blatantly obvious that this isn't the case.

There seem to be two types of women out there, women who really hate sex but will do it for a bit for their social status, try to get the best genetic material available to procreate, and then usually stop with sex unless they need a new provider. Many married men complain about this type it is practically a cliche. Instead of just refusing to have sex at all, these women fake it and degrade themselves only for practical reasons and then men wonder why they treat sex as currency. They do it because they know they are whoring themselves out when they do it, but they don't have enough self respect and independence to risk losing power it gives them over men. They are also often very stupid thinking they'll be very careful with whom they get fucked by and only have sex with Chad, and he will be eternally grateful for this precious and intimate "gift". Then after getting used over and over again they bitterly settle for a beta provider, reproduce, and stop. they often cheat to ensure the right genetic material and they can excuse it cause they hate their beta providers anyway for being the best they could get and still so shit, and for having that level male sexually degrade them (aka have sex with them). Betas are happy for a bit and then spend the rest of their lives between couple's therapy and porn at rare moments when they get some free time between providing and offspring. These women are spineless used goods who shouldn't get anything but ridicule.

The second group are women who genuinely love getting fucked, and to get there they fully embraced their masochism and decided to call it feminist and empowering, which is of course the complete opposite. Naturally, they need a Chad for it to really work because they need to feel completely dominated - whether it's by male body or his overall status, they always need to be the inferior ones - that way they are in touch with their true nature and they enjoy it. They let themselves have all kinds of shit done to their bodies and shoved in their holes,take videos and photos of it, allow other women to join in and get cucked, etc telling themselves they are being adventurous and progressive while men laugh and ask for more. They need a way to compensate for that or else they would suffer from some type of mental breakdown, so everyone who fucks them learned to act like they are the shit and keep their egos as high as possible when not fucking. This type be even more generous with their beta orbiters and normies will sometimes be fuck buddies between Chads, as it gives their egos more boost to additionally compensate the fact that they are everyone's cum box. They feel very superior to the first group of wannabe females cause they think they really are what men want, they aren't faking it. but then there is so many of them and after a polyamorous decade or so and getting the idea that they are actually just being used and ridiculed, the whole "I'm into it too" shit starts to slowly fade away. Then they wonder how they ended up in abusive relationships, or how they always get cheated on despite being so cool about it, once hotter younger models replace them for good. Now they are Chad's ex wife/gf, perhaps with kids and shittier body. Then it's the same beta provider route for them and "past is past". Those videos shouldn't make him insecure just because after 10 years she discovered she is no longer into anal and bisexuality.

Every woman who has sex knows she is degrading herself and allowing herself to be dominated. That is why the topic of sex and "objectification" is such a sensitive one. Look at a man sexually, it's a simple compliment, there's nothing to it let alone an ego offense. Women however always experience this mix of things ranging between ego trips to wondering if their whole essence is being mentally violated. Because they know that their role in the fantasy and actual act of sex is pretty embarrassing.

To be sexy, women act absolutely ridiculous. Wear shoes they can't walk in well, paint their whole faces, spend hours working on their hair, strike ridiculous unnatural poses for hot photos... a man who acts that way doesn't just look ridiculous because of social norms but because it is ridiculous and you see it in a context you didn't get fully immune to. From looking at women acting sexy to watching how women act while having sex, they just seem so affected and fake. Mo matter how much everyone tells them it really is so empowering, and no matter how many times they say to to themselves, on some level everyone knows this is the truth that can remain ignored as long as no one acknowledges it out loud.

That's why women put so much effort into attacking everyone and everything who doesn't sugarcoat their sexual reality, but don't have the spine to have personal dignity and not act like sluts since it could cost them some social attention. Rather than doing something different they focus on forcing people not to call it what it is.

Rad fems are right, they should never let anyone fuck them at all. I could even respect that. It's their only way out of being Chad's bitch, as that is the only thing sexually active women can strive for due to the nature of the act - it always makes them someone's bitch so everything below Chad just isn't going to feed their rationalizations long enough for them to keep on doing it before they start to get sick of it. For women, sex always has a price. Betas should know, most of their energy has to go into paying for it.

Only women who reject sex completely are truly dignified. Of course they get hated on as well, even here. But it's maybe the only chance they have in being people, one thing they always (rightfully) fear their sexuality is taking away from them. Except instead of addressing the cause they try to hide the effect.

Greg Paulson #racist webcache.googleusercontent.com

Yes, I am a white racialist, and I admire North Korea. Let me explain.

North Korea is not communist, plain and simple. Juche, the official state ideology of North Korea, can be roughly translated as “spirit of self-reliance.” Kim Jong Il, the Supreme Leader of North Korea, said the basis of Juche is the idea that “man is the master of everything and decides everything” [1]. Juche can also be understood as “always putting Korean things first.”[2] This is obviously more nationalist than communist. In 2009 North Korea officially stopped using the term communism to describe itself and removed it from the constitution. Additionally, they inserted the term “Songun” into the constitution, which emphasizes the powerful position of the North Korean military in the government, and posits that it is model for society to emulate.

The most common criticism of North Korea is that it spends a huge amount on its military while its people starve. The US government estimates that North Korea spends roughly a quarter of its GNP on the military.[3] This puts North Korea at the top of the list for proportional military spending. What people don’t seem to understand is that North Korea’s radical autarkist ideology—in other words, its refusal to bow to the international financial order (putting Korea first)—absolutely requires that national defense be put first. Without a powerful military North Korea could not exist. So yes, North Korea accepts what little aid it can get and has struggled to adequately feed some portions of its population, but that is the price of independence for them, and they are willing to pay it—and for that alone the North Koreans get my respect. Whatever you can say about the North Koreans, you cannot say they are weak. Their will is strong, and they seem willing to die to maintain their independence.

Another misconception is that North Korea is a puppet state somehow controlled by China. Although historically China had great influence on North Korea, the relationship has been strained in recent decades, and North Korea has made it clear that it is no puppet state. China continues to be North Korea’s sole ally because of lucrative trade,[4] historic friendship, and the fact that North Korea, were it desperate enough, could be very problematic for China. There is no doubt that China enjoys some influence, but North Korea remains a firmly independent nation. If this isn’t made clear enough by their ultra-nationalism, their ethnocentrism surely drives it home.

According to B. R. Myers, the North Korean ideology maintains that “the Korean people are too pure-blooded, and so too virtuous to survive in this evil world without a great parental leader.”[5] He also asserts that in addition to feeling that foreign races are inferior, the North Korean government “occasionally criticizes the Jews’ influence on world affairs.”[6] Following in the footsteps of hyper-nationalist movements of the past, the North Korean government has established the belief that its people are uniquely intelligent, strong-willed, and superior in many ways to foreign races. The Japanese (their close racial cousins), had very similar beliefs before being defeated in the Second World War. Myers actually believes the Koreans adopted their racial beliefs from the “fascist Japanese” during Japan’s occupation of Korea. Regardless of their claims of superiority, or from whom they might have borrowed it, the average North Korean IQ of 105 is one of the highest in the world.[7] South Korea is reported to have an average IQ one point higher, at 106, which is almost certainly due to the population having greater access to resources. Keep in mind the severe sanctions North Korea is operating under.

While I don’t agree with the extent of the state-control of the economy in North Korea (i.e. controlling consumption), I certainly have no loyalty to the capitalist system, which I see as racially corrosive, among other things. And let us not forget the whole reason the United States got involved in the Korean civil war was to defend (or impose) capitalism and by extension the ruling international financial order.

Essentially I admire North Korea because it is in direct opposition to the hostile ruling elite in the West and the globalist destruction of distinct peoples and nations. North Korea is the only ethno-nationalist state opposing the current world order, and as long as it exists, it will stand as an example (and a possible future ally) for ethnic and racial nationalists everywhere, especially those of us in the West who see the only hope for our people in the destruction of the current world order.

The Ignorant Fisherman #fundie theignorantfishermen.com

The American Mainstream Media and Washington D.C. are dominated today by a Leftist, Secular and Godless mindset. That isn't any secret. Not even the unregenerate (unbelievers) will disagree with that. As Lucifer (Satan) controls more and more of the Media today - with these godless surrogates and talking heads - his agenda is moving along quite rapidly and increasing exponentially. Never in the history of this nation has the Main Stream Liberal Media pushed and supported a President’s leftist agenda as this one we have today.

Today Lucifer’s American Leftist Media is ram-rodding, bulldozing, redefining and cultivating the U.S. ground for the future grand reception of his ultimate agenda presided over by his Ultimate Minion, the Anti-Christ, who will head a godless and secular world government in the near future. At that time he will totally posses ALL the World’s Media and will vigorously push his global godless agenda to all the world's doom.

Mirror, Mirror On The Wall

Who has the shiniest mirror of them all?

SupremeG #sexist incels.co

Character attributes of a typical foid

Narcissicist, arrogant, selfish, Passive-aggresive, jealous, paranoid, lazy, manipulative, self-centered, boring, rude, haughty, dominating, demanding, intolerant, self-righteous, ignorant, impulsive, unstable, wasteful, reckless, irrational, stroppy, argumentative, bullying, vindictive and sociopathic. Except that, Foids are OK.

purpplerainn, blastinum & JustLetTheWorldBurn #sexist reddit.com

(purpplerainn)

Notice how they think we were getting upset about the guy being hot with a hot gf when we were actually getting upset that we wouldn't never have anyone wake us up in the morning with kisses. Just goes to show the blackpill is real and IT only knows how to attack strawmans.

Seriously IT dedicated a sub to hate on the idea of incels that they fucking created lol, r/braincels is simply built on the idea that if your born unattractive your struggle in life is going to be greater than someone born attractive, less than 10% of this sub would advocate rape and murder, NO ONE HERE ACTUALLY BELIEVES WE ARE ENTITLED TO SEX, the members that hate women started doing so after coming here and seeing the facts (even then a lot of us still don’t hate them), not the contrary as they would love to have you believe. My chad/chadlite friends talked openly all throughout school about how women are inferior to men, they don’t deserve equal rights, they don’t deserve respect, feminism is a joke, all woman are stupid, said schooling them is a waste of money and they should stay at home to cook and clean, but they all have relationships or constant hook ups because of their looks. They were all fucking racist too. We simply use this sub to cope and pass the time because society has rejected us, but they can’t even let us have that.

(blastinum)
Imagine being told by your parents that you can do anything you set your mind to, then you find out a decent number of people are homeless/in poverty. You tell yourself “it’s their fault” and start attributing negative qualities to them because the idea that you could just as easily be in their shoes scares you. Poor people are now “drug addicts” and “bad with money” or “lazy”. Similarly, we (incels) become anything that it takes for normies to reject the idea that the world isn’t fair or forgiving. Putting us down is their cope.

(JustLetTheWorldBurn)
Fucking hell this says it all about privileged KIDS living in the protective bubble their mommies and daddies built for them. They've never met anyone who has it bad and if they did, they wouldn't associate with them because it might pop that bubble and GASP, prove them wrong.

Itsover4maymaycels #sexist #wingnut #psycho incels.co

The matriarchy will crash and burn under its' own weight, and it'll be glorious

Nothing can articulate the hatred i feel for the current global system in power, it's simply an epiphany that can't be fully translated into words. the combination of every blackpill i've ever swallowed coming together into one final realization of the direction the world is going in, who wants this and why.

Think about where the life of the average male citizen is going, our houses become smaller and smaller every year, we own less and less property, get hired less and less than females, relationships and sex harder and harder to obtain, become more and more silenced under the pretense of "privilege", more and more docilized, pacified, as our testosterone levels drop. The most powerful rulers have no morals, mercy or dignity, the rulers of the world ever since the industrial revolution have always been the same, hedonistic, just world fallacy spreading bourgeouis that want nothing but to make each generation comfortable with less and less, slowly stripping us of our individuality and ruling over us as a mass of docilized worker ants with no rights or voice, forever fuelling their hedonism and the privilege of females as medicine advances and gives the bourgeois the privilege of immortality. The elites are also sociopathic, primitive apes in nature and the biggest perpetrators of lookism, judging people by their sexual value, they will always be biased in favor of the female, even though she is useless in almost every other category, Women are Wonderful effect in practice.

But this system will not win forever, it can't, the truth is not on their side, once someone learns the objective, empyrical truth of the world (Blackpill) they can't go back, they lose a follower, these amoral shithead apes know this and want us isolated, humiliated, but no matter how slow the spread, the truth will always prevail in the end, the more they torture ugly men the harsher the revolution will be, i hope our lives become true hell on earth so that every soy guzzling, female worshipping Uncle Tom weakling gets swept by the strong men that came out of the hard times, castrated and forced into sweatshop work for their crimes, not crimes against laws, but crimes against reason, for violating the truth, supporting a system that does nothing but shun and oppress their kind for nothing but a small chance at sex. The fall of the matriarchy is inevitable.

gladiatorcel #conspiracy #sexist #wingnut #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Venting] Society is built around women


Yes yes, water is wet, but - It's all built around the protection of women. They claim to be equal to men, however they cannot fight for themselves or be on their own, making them expensive citizens. The amount of resources spent on their protection is insane, and for what? So they can influence politics and make it socially acceptable to sleep around and therefore being able to select a smaller number of men who they can fuck until "the age wall" sets in? And even then, their SMV is still high enough to attract younger men, which is why feminism is promoting polyamory as a good and natural thing. It's beyond cucked that they can have their cake and it eat too.

This will likely never change, irreversible damage has been done. Women are the ruling class. Even if chads only make up 5% of men, women and chads combined make up more than half of the population, meaning that they are the ones to influence the direction of politics. On top of that, there are the bluepilled men who have been brainwashed into thinking that the chads + women are the ones who are correct, and therefore simp for politics that actually negatively impact them. It's like a purely capitalistic society, where even the most poor citizens (cucked betas) want more capitalism (women's right to ride the CC and marry when it's time for comfort).

Funny, isn't it though? Most women want to live in a economically socialistic world where money is distributed fairly to every human (a society in where men most men are at the top rn, as CEO's, managers, etc). However, when it comes to other human needs like sex and affection, in which they rule, they want it to be as capitalistic as possible.

"But sex and affection cannot be distributed fairly, its not a material". While this is true, you can still enforce monogamy and early marriage, aswell as shaping a culture where it's socially unacceptable to whore around, as it is PROVEN that a high number of partners affects future relationships negatively.

After all, men are the ones who provide a lot of the hard labor, so if they are not motivated, go figure.

TL;DR: Women are hypocrites, people get mad at the wealthy for voting for their own self-interests, but not when women do the exact same.

i probably have spelling mistakes in here but cba fixing that shit im just trying to rant.

sjfrellc #sexist google.no

I’m not bitter, not a misogynist, not a threat to others (except when I want to be) and have improved myself as a self respecting masculine male with red pill awareness and game actions. I’m ten times the husband over the last two years and a much better father. I love and support my wife and children without regret. That could change tomorrow, but for now it holds as self evident to me, (Ego-Investment or not). In short I’m not evil now, where I could have been bitter and malevolent 5 years ago until I gained red pill awareness out of evo-psych principles. I’m feeling great this week.
And I think (in my INTJ brain) that you have to be ignorant, dumb, stupid or lazy to not see evo-psych proven premises as not actually being self evident and observing behavior for 50 years. Or reading a book or two (or hundreds).

lone77star #fundie lone77star.hubpages.com

Carl Sagan was stupid. He jumped to so many conclusions on subjects for which he held disagreements, that I seriously consider him a prime candidate for my Silly-Willy-Nilly-Scientist award. I agree with you completely about a large God and large universe. Some Christians think the universe is only 6,000 years old, so they disrespect science big time and gain nothing. I have never believed in a small God, either. Sagan was good at talking in generalities and half-truths. My brother told me of one Sagan book critical on the works of others he labeled as "pseudo-scientific." One chapter of that book was later retracted because Sagan misunderstood the subject, largely because he had never read the man's work! Duh!

Sagan was good at creating rifts where there didn't need to be. He was good at the darker side of skepticism—self-indulgent ridicule. And, like a good little warrior, his friend, Ann Druyen, recently in the news, is reacting to the self-indulgent ridicule of so-called "Christian fundamentalists." All of that is non-neutral ego speaking, from both sides of the fence.

James, you said, "You describe Ussher as 'delusional,'" but I certainly did not. You got that one entirely wrong. Never said it. Never intended it. Ussher was a brilliant scholar. If you will re-read what I wrote, you will see that only modern adherents to Ussher's timeline are described as delusional in my discussion of Ussher and his work. Ussher did not know of the findings of modern science. If he had, he might never have published his most famous work. Even Sir Isaac Newton created his own version of a biblical timeline. Either of these great men might have arrived at a completely different timeline because of the "reality" described by modern science. To ignore science is to ignore reality. That is a description of delusion. Ussher never knew modern science, so he was not delusional in this regard.

Hunter Wallace #racist occidentaldissent.com

[From "Slavery: A Positive Good (2012)"]

Dixie

“But I take higher ground. I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good – a positive good.”
– John C. Calhoun, 1837

Is there a positive case for the domestic institution of negro slavery?

(1) In slave societies, negroes were a wealth generating economic asset: America’s slaves were worth more than its railroads, banks, and manufacturing industries combined.

In 1861, the average slave was worth $800. In 2009 dollars, a single slave purchased in 1861 would be an asset worth $135,000.

(2) In 1860, 49.8 percent of the population of Barbour County (AL) were slaves.

(3) In 1860, there were 2,717 free families in Barbour County (AL). There were 1,143 slaveholders. 42.1 percent of free families were slaveholders.

(4) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley as a whole, there were 47 slaveholders who owned over 100 slaves. If the average slave was an asset worth $135,000, then each one of these super planters in 1860 had a fortune in slaves alone worth a minimum of $13.5 million dollars.

(5) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, there were 270 slaveowners who owned 50 to 100 slaves. If the average slave was worth $135,000, then each one of these middling planters had a fortune in slaves alone worth a minimum of $6.7 million dollars.

(6) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, there were 1,193 slaveowners who owned 20 to 50 slaves. If the average slave was worth $135,000, then these lower tier planters had a fortune in slaves alone worth a minimum of $2.7 million dollars.

Obviously, the planter class in the Lower Chattahoochee Valley was stupendously wealthy by modern standards – those numbers don’t include their non-slave property or investments and are based on the minimum number of slaves required to belong to each tier.

In 1860, there were 1,150 planters in the Lower Chattahoochee Valley. The planters were only 17.3 percent of slaveholders though. How’s that compared to the stock market?

(7) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, there were 1,637 slaveowners who owned 10 to 19 slaves. If the average slave was worth $135,000, then these upper middle class slaveowners had a fortune in slaves alone worth $1.35 million dollars.

(8) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, there were 1,485 slaveowners who owned 6 to 9 slaves. If the average slave was worth $135,000, then the typical middle class slaveowner had a fortune worth $810,000.

(9) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, there were 4,100 slaveowners who owned 1 to 5 slaves. 47 percent of slaveowners in the Lower Chattahoochee Valley belonged to this group. Every one of these slaveowners had at least one slave worth $135,000.

(10) In Barbour County (AL), 42.1 percent of free families were slaveowners – surely, the great majority of them were middle class slaveowners, while only a small minority were planters.

How much is the average negro household worth after 147 years of free society? The average negro household is worth $4,995.

As we have learned from Paul Kersey, the average single black woman in America has a net worth of $5, which is over a 99 percent depreciation in value from 1861. A third of blacks have a negative net worth. They are effectively bankrupt after 40 years and countless billions of dollars of wasted Great Society redistributive spending.

Freedom failed doesn’t quite capture the magnitude of the social and economic disaster that was abolition: it is more like freedom was a world shattering catastrophe that nearly crippled American civilization.

In free society, the average White household might have a net worth of $110,000 in 2012, most of which is locked up in the value of their depreciating suburban home – with both parents working in order to pay income taxes to a federal government that redistributes their wealth to millions of idle tax consuming negro voters.

In slave society, if you owned one slave, you had an asset worth $135,000 in 2009 dollars not counting your property or home, those slaves worked in direct proportion to the leisure time of a single male slaveowning patriarch, and there was no income tax because the government was funded with a revenue tariff.

(11) That’s the rub: under slavery, the negro was a fabulous wealth generating economic dynamo, the ownership of which emancipated White families from the drudgery of wage labor and significantly contributed to our national prosperity.

Under free society, the negro is the single biggest economic albatross in the United States and a civilization wrecking menace to public safety who through the genius of liberal democracy can vote himself a living from taxes and fees on the income and property of White families.

(13) Libertarians: What planter ever emancipated his slaves based on the assumption that liberating them would increase his wealth and make his plantation more productive?

(14) As a commodity, slaves were used as a store of value like gold and silver or stocks and bonds: a single slave in 1850 was worth $80,000 whereas a single slave in 1860 was worth $135,000.

(15) Paul Kersey writes:

“Black unemployment rates are directly correlated to the fact that a great many Black people are unemployable in America’s service economy, save for government/public jobs. Not institutional racism.”

The only known solution to this problem is slavery.

There are any number of industries where the millions upon millions of negroes who have an IQ less than 85 could be profitably employed today as slaves.

They could be put to work immediately as stoop laborers in the construction industry or in the fields harvesting fruits and vegetables. Alternatively, they could at least be hooked up to bicycles and used to manually generate cheap electricity to promote America’s goal of energy independence.

Even today, a slave society could find some use for them. Black women could be employed as domestics as they were in the Jim Crow South. They don’t have to become welfare queens shacking up with Mr. EBT to breed little Ja’Quares Walkers or Trayon Omar Washingtons in the Booker T. Washington housing projects.

If negroes were enslaved in such a way, we could empty our prisons, raise property values, raise per pupil spending on White students, slash law enforcement and court costs, fund an expedition to Mars, and slash the soaring cost of healthcare by curtailing epidemic black obesity.

(16) As far back as the 1830s, free negroes in the Northern states were notorious for elevating crime, destroying property values, and burdening prisons and other social services.

In free societies, the cost of negroes is socialized whereas it was privatized in slave societies: abolition eliminated natural masters (who provided employment for White working class overseers) who had a vested economic interest and legal responsibility for curtailing destructive behavior and promoting productive labor.

(17) Any student of the discipline of negro management in the Old South could have told you that emancipating slaves, blaming White people for all their various failings, and giving them access to drugs and firearms was a recipe for disaster. See the 21,000 black people who have been murdered by other black people in Detroit since 1969.

(18) In 1850, a slaveowner could have told you that the return on investment on negro education was quite low because of biological racial differences in intelligence.

(19) In 1850, a slaveowner could have told you that abolition and the politicization of the negro was a recipe for disaster based on previous experiments in abolition in Haiti and the British West Indies.

(20) Slave society promoted conservatism and racial solidarity in the Old South. It also created an indigenous elite that had the wealth and political power to resist the encroachment of the degenerating effects of liberal capitalist democracy.

Note: Virtually all the social ills that are commonly blamed on slavery are actually a consequence of freedom.

Slave societies didn’t tolerate or meekly subsidize negro criminals or flagellate themselves with racial guilt. The negro had no status as a citizen or a voter. He wasn’t a huge drag on our national prosperity as he is today in the 21st century.

Slavery was a positive good. It was a successful social system that broadly distributed wealth among Whites, created an elite invested in white supremacy, cultivated a moral sense based on the cult of honor, and most importantly, acted as a brake on the consolidation of power in Washington.

The success of slavery proved to be its downfall. It was a rival economic system that inspired enormous jealously, fear, and envy of the Slave Power in the North. As we all know, that’s what brought about the War Between the States, destroyed the White Republic created by the Founders, and set America down its path to the present racial disaster.

That’s not the fault of slavery though. It is the fault of slavery’s professed enemies.

Sparrow's Song #sexist incels.co

[Serious] Women are bad, don't envy normiecucks

All normie males get cucked. All femoids are fucking the same guys in your area. Their betabux are either clueless or accept it as a harsh reality. So why bother wanting a femoid? It's 2018, they're obsolete and highly toxic, their nature causes harm to the environment.They are not what society tells us they are. Now that I know TFN and AWALT, fuck love, LTR, marriage and shit. Femoids are just too shallow and heartless to even feel right about being around. The time it takes to fuck an escort is probably the most time I'd want to be near one of those demonic creatures. All they do is collect Chads to feed their egos and body counts. They are all the same, I've never seen a femoid that was different. They are a curse to the huMAN existence, needing them to reproduce is RageFuel/SuicideFuel for the huMAN race in general. Why couldn't our species be asexual, fuck. If female companion robots and artificial wombs aren't available to replace femoids in 15 years, I'm fucking roping just because living in a world that is totally under their control is living in a world that is not worth living in at all.

RosemaryHaze #sexist reddit.com

This comment was especially poignant (to me, at least): From Lee: "We also need to look at why the penultimate of an attractive WOMAN is a 'just barely' 18-year-old girl/young woman who has a baby face and no real life experience. Very uncomfortable area for most people to face."

Well, the truth has been broadcasted right to us in our faces about males, they like kids and women that look like kids. A lot. See Korean and Japanese culture where gown women are expected to be cutesy and girlishly peppy even well into 30's (with looks to match). We can see this as they push for consent age to go lower and lower and for pedos to be seen as normal. Grown adult women are no Bueno because we remind them that they too, are grown adults. All men are on some Peter Pan shit. And evidently public hair is bad on women, but they can have back hair, ear hair (ew), neck hair, face hair, leg hair, butt crack hair, etc. That's manliness, you see. Hairy. So, in man-think, the opposite of that is newborn bald (but only for pits, legs and pubic hair, you better have hair on your head that rivals a Redken model).

Every woman that went through puberty knows what males really are, because every single woman has a story or two about inappropriate things said, and even worse, done to them as children.

Now, I know some women are naturally thin, but I believe the males have fetishized 'thin' because when a person is not naturally thin and they starve to maintain unnatural thinness, they are generally weak and sick. You aren't too strong when you are anemic and low on body fuel. Kinda like, if you got your feet bound, you can't run too far or do too much fighting back. It's always all about crippling us, keeping us small and compact (out the way until needed for dick ornamentation), and child-like because doodbro evo psych 'neoteny'.

I also believe keeping women preoccupied with looks and make up and fashions is another way they have infiltrated the female mind and kept us away from more meaningful pursuits. Of course, the end game there is the grand prize of having attracted your very own doofus to care for and slave after. And the inevitable mental breakdown as you age and realize that you entire life has been a sad puppet show and you didn't even get to enjoy your best, most vital years doing anything constructive beyond schooling. Not saying all women, but that appears to be the fate of most.

Tl;dr: Males don't like it when their fuckthings appear to have human qualities and human failings. And the world has always turned a blind eye to Male Entitlement Syndrome and allowed girl children and women to be the victims of nasty ass scumbags.

Vasily Kukushkin #wingnut #conspiracy #racist 8kun.top

image
image
image

Hi, friends! My name is Vasily Kukushkin, I'm developer of "Der Sieg: 1944".

"Der Sieg: 1944" is the propagandist national-socialist computer game. It is top-down action-rpg set in alternative reality in 1944, which tells us a story of a Gestapo officer in occupied London, who is fighting with underground network of Antifa, redpilling the player, as the story goes on. It will be somewhat similar to "Angry Goy" but with many differences:

* Story focused gameplay

* Side-quests

* Deeper lore

* Character and weapon upgrade system

* Decisions possibility, which will affect game ending

* Collectibles (posters, letters, music records and so on)

* Inventory and item system

* In-game radio system (like in Fallout) with music and fictional news

The development started not so long ago, but you can follow the development of the game and ask your questions at the: gab com/Der_Sieg

If you have any questions about the game and it's world, I'll be glad to answer them.

P.S. I apologize for the fact that English is not my native language.

TL;DR: I'm creating national-socialist computer game, if you're interested in it - you can follow game development at: gab com/Der_Sieg

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child #racist 3edgesword.blogspot.com

[From "Don't say "Red China" anymore, it's "Peoples of Canada's First Nations China" now"]

Millions of people around the world are expected to be killed from the Wuhan Flu. Hundreds of thousands already have

The country that birthed the disease (either through poor biosecurity, medieval-calibre animal markets, or a deliberate act of war) is the one seemingly least impacted by it.

Around the world free market economies (with a half dozen quotation marks around many of those words) are effectively shut down, which probably will cause the largest global recession in history. It might last for many months or possibly even multiple years.

Oil futures even temporarily reached negative value (with another half dozen quotation marks around many of those words) while Alberta oil is effectively without value due to the pipeline fiasco of the past few years.

So what, pray tell, does ForeignPolicy.com think is the big problem we have to worry about? Why, lazy Red Indians not getting their way over land that was never theirs, obviously.

As has been the case for over a century and a half, since Canadian Confederation, the territory of ostensibly sovereign indigenous nations within Canada has been consistently used for major infrastructure projects that non-indigenous Canadians don’t want to see run through their own backyards. This partly explains why it was so easy for indigenous protests to nearly shut down the Canadian economy in February: railways, highways, pipelines, canals, and other strategic infrastructure already cut through indigenous territory.

Taylor Noakes, for those who may not have known, is "a freelance journalist from Montreal" and an occasional CBC and National Post writer who "focuses on the intersection of history, architecture, urban planning and public policy". In other words, a hardcore leftist who hounds Jason Kenney by lying about subsidies and who writes about how "rule of law" should be subject to protest (but only when his friends are the ones doing it). It also means he's probably not stupid: he knows that what he wrote is wrong.

Like all leftists, Taylor Noakes is a liar. Always. He's always lying.

The reason railways, highways, pipelinies, canals, and other long thin things always "cut through indigenous territory" (which, by the by, isn't sovereign and nobody other than far-left activists ever believed that) is because lazy Red Indians claim their territory is the entire country. Remember that in B.C. various tribes including the Wet Soup One Indian Bands claim their territory is largest than the actual land mass of the province. The same Noakes who lied by referring to oil as having negative value in reference to the article about oil futures I posted above is welcome to explain how with negative land space in B.C. available to them, Coastal Gas is going to build a pipeline without some Red Indians whining about it.

[...]

Wickham indicates that the five clans of the Wet’suwet’en nation are unable to continue negotiations because their consensus-based meeting system would require congregations of more than 50 people, which have been outlawed as part of Canada’s social distancing guidelines. Though the Wet’suwet’en have complied with the regulations, the same rules do not appear to apply to pipeline workers. Moreover, Wickham indicated that both the federal and provincial governments are unwilling to discuss either the pipeline or the presence of the RCMP in indigenous territory during negotiations.

Finally some good news out of all this. The federal and provincial governments should have been unwilling to negotiate with these lazy Wet Soup whiners from the very beginning: white landowners never got this treatment and therefore red land-sitters (the land is actually owned by the federal government who has the complete right to build on it at any time). Meanwhile what's this lie about "their consesnsus-based meeting system"? Strangely enough this wasn't on their list of demands on February 21st, and didn't seem to be in effect when useless tit of a cabinet minister Carolyn Bennett met with a half dozen chiefs in a closed door meeting. This sounds like another ridiculous lie promoted by deceitful Red Indians and their stooges like Noakes.

[...]

Companies leaving for the bad political landscape is due to two dishonest and disgusting actors: Red Indian savages and the far-left Antifa thugs that associate with them, and the cowardly idiotic Shiny Pony government. It's a fun little game that deceitful liars like Noakes like to use. Step one: have the savages make a big stink about a project. Step two: have the craven idiots in leftist governments take appeasement action. Step three: have the savages get even more...well, savage...and cause maximum damage and disruption. Step four: have the leftist government negotiate a deal that makes the project completely impossible. Step five: when the investors say "to hell with you all" use that as some sort of compelling evidence that clearly the project wasn't that great in the first place.

21cell #sexist reddit.com

Anyone who tells you they hate incels because of "misogyny" is lying.

As a low-value male, people are disgusted by your very existence. Everything they do is an attempt to get you out of their mind.

Just look at ForeverAlone during its early days. Certainly a bluepilled sub by today's standards, but they were the punching bags of Reddit. No accusations of promoting violence, no quarantine, no shitty news articles blaming them all for a terrorist attack, but they were still insulted and considered an embarassment to Reddit anyway. People want you to shut up about your problems so they don't have to hear it, even if you aren't directly speaking to them.

And guess what happened when incels posted "rope threads"? You guessed it, a bunch of disingenuous normies who don't really give a shit about them, and would tell an incel to fuck off if he had ever approached them in real life. It lets the normie feel like he helped, thus allowing him to clear his conscience, but incels can see right through it after a lifetime of outright hostility.

People don't hate incels because of "misogyny". They hate incels because they remind people of the more uncomfortable truths of life- some people will just get screwed over because of factors they can't control, you can't guarantee getting anything you want just by trying over and over again. When confronted with a threat to the just world fallacy, they will do anything to try and get you to shut up and stop complaining.

And now that they have the long-sought-after opportunity to dismiss us all as evil rapist murderers, you can bet they're gonna take it.

ElliotsDisciple #sexist reddit.com

Simps/White Knights/Betas/Orbiters need to be purged.

So, I was just browsing Normiegram and somehow stumbled onto the page of an instawhore with 3 million followers. Decided to see who makes up the majority of her followers, no surprise.. it's simps. There is no fucking way that 3 million men can lust after 1 talentless whore. This over abundance of dick makes the incel struggle harder because now any average, fat, or ugly whore can get on instagram and have a million simps worshipping her. Then these whores develop an ego the size of Jupiter in real life. Its already bad enough we have to compete with fucking Chads, now these bitches think they deserve to be treated like goddesses too. Despite all of this, I don't blame the whores, I blame the remedial betas who worship these bitches. If more of these men woke the fuck up then maybe our gender wouldn't be treated like shit, people would go back to dating their looksmatch, and incels would finally get a taste of "love". Until then fuck betas, simps, white knights, orbiters, normies, and anyone who agrees with this unfair system. Betas make it so that women get an over abundance of love, while incels get none.

TL;DR: Fuck Thirsty Betas.

Stephanie Relfe #conspiracy metatech.org

One blessing of having a website like this one, with such extraordinary information, is that we get to talk on the phone with some very interesting people, many of whom have had really unusual and paranormal things happen to them. That’s often what brings them to this site. This is one reason why we are able to believe all the weird stuff we write about, and have a much better understanding of it, than isolated individuals can.

These are generally not crazy people. They are intelligent, well spoken, from an enormous variety of backgrounds and trainings. Many are, or were, professionals in the business world. A number of them have connections to very famous people.

Many of the people who have talked with us felt that they were going mad with the strange things happening to them, and no one around them believing in such stuff, and therefore it was a great relief to them to find us and learn that similar extremely strange happenings have happened to thousands of other people. While each case is unique, it is amazing how many people who we have talked with often have two or more of the following characteristics:

Metaphysical abilities, even if they had only a glimpse of what was possible, from a few experiences.
Interesting bloodlines, often including a famous or aristocratic person in their background.
Close family member in the military, often the father, and usually not something simple like a soldier, but often a high-ranking officer and/or member of intelligence.
Close family member a high ranking Freemason.
Close experiences with interesting locations, such as Area 51 or other military bases.
Part of childhood spent in Germany, or time spent in other countries with Masonic connections, such as Scotland or Egypt (the only two countries ever to wear kilts), that seemed out of character with the family.
Plus it is very common for them to also have, due to programming –

Extreme money difficulties, even though they were well educated and had no apparent cause for this.
Terrible relationship problems, usually on their own, even if they were good looking, nice, professional people from reasonably happy families.
A few days ago, I was talking with a very nice man who has some interesting abilities, and he had a most interesting story to tell.

He had a very bad childhood. He realized later on that he had been groomed his whole life for a particular position. He was good looking, studying to be an actor in the USA, and dating a daughter of a very powerful member of organized crime. A relative at another college had his photo on her dresser, and his soon-to-be girlfriend saw the photo and said – “I’m going to marry that man.” Presumably, the demons were speaking to her, as you will see.

That girl changed colleges to pursue him. Later on when they were dating she asked him if he would like to have a spirit guide. He agreed, and not much later after that she went to join her witches’ coven that was meeting for Halloween. The man was in his bedroom that Halloween night, when out of a full length mirror, an adult-sized being stepped out.

The being was wearing a long, black cloak and a Quaker hat. He had glowing red eyes. He floated along the floor, three inches above the ground. No feet could be seen. Yet he was present in a total physical, 3-dimensional form. The man whom I am talking about was fully awake. This was no dream.

The being asked the man if he would like to join them. The being was meant to be the man’s spirit guide for life. In return, the man would receive all of the material things that he could ever wish for – fame as a movie star, immense riches, the girl for his wife, everything that he had been programmed to desire. The being was not there to sell the man on the benefits, he was just stating what the deal was. The being assumed that everything had been prearranged by the girlfriend, that this was a done deal.

However, I guess the girlfriend had not sufficiently done her homework, because the man looked at the being, and could clearly tell that this being was evil, and not with God. He chose instead to serve God, and refused the being, even if that meant material hardship to himself.

When he did that, the being reached to grab his heart. To protect himself, the man closed his eyes and meditated. He saw himself surrounded by Maharishi (he had done Transcendental Meditation – we don’t recommend that, but include this information as part of the story) and Christ’s light which was warm and golden. The being was not able to get through to him.

So the being returned to the mirror. The man was told later by his girlfriend that the being appeared at the coven that night, and hit the leader of the coven in the chest. The leader of the coven died, but was taken to hospital, and was revived later in the hospital (I guess that was a near-death experience). However, the coven leader was very sick for years later on.

Note about spirit guides: We do not recommend you have any spirit guides. Years before I met Michael and became a Christian, I occasionaly talked to two spirit guides I had. Eventually, however, I realized that they weren’t too smart, and that I did not need them. God and my higher self provided all the information I needed. I therefore asked them to leave (which they did). You have the Holy Spirit in your heart, and do not need to go anywhere else for guidance.

———–

The being with the Quaker hat used the mirror as a portal. A portal is an unseen vortex that connects two places through time and space, and even dimensions or other realities or timelines.

I absolutely believe the story of the being coming out of the mirror and talking with the man. I was thinking about that story when Michael sent me a video of a psychic investigator, a woman who can see energies in and around people. In the first video she says that cell phones open up portals to other dimensions. We had already much reason to believe that, having seen the effect they have on people, and how super addicted people are to their phones, particularly smart phones.

I have also seen posts on a forum where people were discussing how within the last few years people have become extremely rude, lazy and self-centered at work, and that this started almost exactly the same time that the smart phones were introduced.


In the second video, she says that a mirror opens up a portal to another dimension. A hallway that has mirrors on both sides, so that they are opposing each other, is described as “a tunnel from Hell”.


HOW I STOPPED MY SCREAMING NIGHTMARES

It was watching the above video, and thinking of the story of the being who walked out of the mirror that a major realization hit me: The appalling nightmares that I had been having for the past three years, all started when we moved into a house that had mirrors on a closet in the bedroom! And the second house we moved into, the one we were in at time of writing, also has a mirror within line of sight of the bedroom.

I was having the most terrible nightmares you can possibly imagine for the past three years. They were so bad I would wake up screaming so loudly that my throat was sore for a while afterwards. They were so bad and so unique that I feel that they were not just a nightmare – something was trying to kill me.

The first time this happened was around 2011. I had virtually never had nightmares my whole life, except for some in my childhood of monsters taking me and my siblings (these no doubt came from the fact that we had to walk quite a long way on our own to and from elementary school, and I was scared to, after being told that people try to pick up and murder children, and my mother refused to take us in the car. Plus being abducted once as a child probably contributed to them as well).

Nearly all of these nightmares were similar. They lasted much less than a second, about as fast as a gun shot, thus giving me no time to respond. I am sure these nightmares were meant to kill me. There was a blast of energy, so powerful, that I was convinced it had killed me and everyone around me, and there was nothing but blackness and despair and the most awful feeling of total hopelessness you can possibly imagine. When I woke up screaming, I was surprised to find that I was alive.
The first time it happened I immediately remembered the story that if people die in a dream, they die in real life (Ref: Movie Dreamscape with Dennis Quaid).

The screaming was so bad my throat hurt for a while afterwards. These nightmares reminded me of the stories I have heard of totally healthy people going to bed and never waking up again. In some cases in China, the person’s hair was been found to turn white.

I have had maybe 30 or 40 of these dreams, averaging around one a month. We continually prayed and muscle tested to find out how these attacks were getting through. There is always a reason for something like this happening. The curse causeless shall not come. Proverbs 26:2.

Unfortunately, the body can only say “yes” or “no” when muscle testing, and we weren’t able to find anything to do. I had prayed off everything to do with family lines, past life sins and other related subjects. We had done everything possible to get all cursed objects out of the house. We had no ‘welcome’ mat inviting demons in. We also have a mezuzah stuck on every door leading to outside, plus the bedroom door. (A mesuzah is a small container which contains quotes from the bible). But still the nightmares continued, so something was still letting the demons in.

And then, shortly after talking with the man on the phone and seeing the above videos, it hit me! The nightmares started when we moved into a house with mirrors covering the closet in the master bedroom. The mirrors were an open portal to other dimensions!

I knew from feng shui that one should not have mirrors in the bedroom, because it causes restless energy. I realize now that mirrors do more than just increase the energy in a room. They let in evil spirits. We were renting, and because the mirrors were on folding doors of the closet, I could not work out how to cover them, and did not realize at the time how important it was that I do so.

Then, a year later, when we moved into another house, the one we were in at time of writing, I hoped that the nightmares would stop. They did not. This time while there were no mirrors in the bedroom, the idiots who designed the house did not put a door between the bedroom and the bathroom, just an open arch. Since we were renting, there wasn’t much I thought I could do. Part of the large vanity mirror looked almost directly into the bedroom, and I ignored the part of my mind that told me it was important to do something about it.

Once I realized that the bathroom mirror was letting something in that was causing my nightmares, I had two choices – cover up the mirror, or put bible verses on it, similar to the way the mezuzahs protect doorways. We know that words have more power than we know of, since, for example, aliens use them as part of their technology,

drone-pacl-q486-photo-4-fullsize-650B

and even CERN, the large hadron collider, that’s 17 miles (27 Km) long, seems to use words as part of whatever strange things it is used for. See the sanskrit words that are on CERN, pictured below.

Some people have even suggested that the purpose of CERN is to create black holes that will let in evil beings from other dimensions. All we know for sure is that it is very strange to put a statue of Shiva the destroyer out the front of a supposedly scientific research station, and that these sanskrit words in CERN likely do not have a good purpose:

CERN-sanksrit2

CERN-sanskrit

In addition to the power of words, we know that there are legal laws that Lucifer and his gang have to follow. For example, when Bill Schnoebelen was a vampire, he could not go into anyone’s house until they invited him in. For example, if he and his wife visited someone for a party, they would stand around and talk on the front doorstep, until the host would say something like, “What are we all standing around here for? Come on in.”

So I chose to print out the following, and tape this on every mirror in the house. Even hand mirrors have this now in super tiny, font size 4;

In the name of Jesus’ Christ, may we, this house, our finances and possessions be protected from all spirits who do not serve God the Creator and Jesus Christ.

Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God. Corinthians1, 10:31

He that believeth on me hath everlasting life. John 6:47

Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. Proverbs 3:5

He took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying “This is my body which is given for you, do this in remembrance of me”. Luke 22:19

————–

Update – 6/17/15

It works! Normally in the 9 months that has gone, I would have had over many dozens of horrific nightmares. I have had not one of the really, really bad ones. In the few weeks after I posted on the mirror, I did have a few minor nightmares, but we found a cursed object (some comic pictures) that had been accidentally left in the bedroom, and removed them. Since doing that, I have been nightmare free!

We are also waking up with more energy.

Around the time that the nightmares started, I started feeling old sometimes, for the first time in my life. This seemed strange because we have a very healthy diet and lifestyle. It seemed that I could have this feeling of weariness, even when I had plenty of sleep, and no sleep debt. That feeling has not been with me since I put the quotes on the mirrors. Sometimes I feel almost 30 again (I’m 54).

Update – 1/4/16 –

REMOVE ALL PICTURES, BOOKS, MAGAZINES, TOYS FROM YOUR BEDROOM

It’s now been 15 months with no nightmares, except for last night. Last night was a shocker; I was completely ‘dead’, hit by lightning, blackness and devastation everywhere etc, and screaming for a long time, with a very hoarse voice.

I realized that the demons got in through a glyph; that is, a special kind of picture. I learned from a woman who made the mistake of being involved with journeying, that glyphs are portals to other dimensions.

The glyph was something in a copy of the Robb Report magazine, that I had foolishly left in the bedroom. This happened again one other time later when a catalog was accidentally left in the bedroom.

Get anything with a picture or logo out of your bedroom; all magazines, catalogs, books, toys and pictures, especially anything that is connected with corporations.

——-

More evidence that mirrors are portals to other dimensions, and allow evil spirits into the room, or maybe even into the whole house:

1) According to Japanese Legend,

If you reflect two mirrors into each other at midnight a demon pops out.

2) In Animal Planet’s The Haunted, some haunted houses are caused by demons who can’t get back into the mirror.

They believe that mirrors are possibly portals for spirits and that some spirits were invoked by mirrors. Once the spirits were called through by the use of the mirrors, who ever did it, just walked away and did not send them back through the mirror portal. So the spirits were trapped.

They also found that some of the mirrors had been covered and some had actually been painted black preventing them from going back through.

3) Chinese cover up mirrors to stop bad things coming out.

Posted on a forum:

“I lived in China for two years working in the fashion industry…I used to visit many factories, etc, and could never work out why all the mirrors always had covers over them. Because I needed to actually use the mirrors lol, I’d have to constantly take the covers from them.

I finally asked … ‘why do you guys always cover the mirrors?… they were not very good at answering this question…

I kept up my questioning, and the only answer I got that made any sense was…. “bad things come out”

… I guess they meant demons…”

4) Alice in Wonderland.

The Illuminati, who make full use of black magick, seem to have an obsession with this book, which is chock full of imagery to do with mind control and perverted predations on children (See some creepy photos of Lewis Carroll and 10-year-old Alice here if you wish).

Alice’s MK-Ultra/abuse probably started with her Oxford University Vice-Chancellor father Henry Liddell, who was also the Dean of Christ Church and he probably allowed her to be used by people like the Reverend Robinson Duckworth (was a chaplain/member of the Order of St. John, with its Maltese style cross always used by the powers that be) who rowed the boat [this nursery rhyme was probably sung in their “entertaining” of the girls: “Row, row, row your boat, gently down the stream. Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily life is but a dream.” (more dissociation ((don’t worry about the abuse, just keep rowing ((keep following the white rabbit, keep following the yellow brick road etc etc))… it’s all just a dream anyway, in MK-Ultra this is partly how dissociation is used; dreams, fantasy and reality are confused)), nursery rhymes/fairy tales are all full of it)].

After Alice in Wonderland, Lewis Carroll wrote Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There, in which Alice enters a fantastical world, this time by climbing through a mirror. Here is a quote about that:

“Members of the bloodlines intentionally insert Illuminati symbols in popular movies and other media in order to bring what Fritz Springmeier calls the “Externalisation of the Hierarchy”…

Walt Disney was commissioned by the Illuminati to produce films such as Fantasia and Alice in Wonderland for mind control purposes. Disney movies are the main films used in mind control but other films such as Wizard of Oz, Star Wars, Star Trek and even The Holy Bible are used in Monarch Mind-Control Programming.”

mirror-mickey-mouse

Demons love mirrors, and many occultists believe mirrors are a way in which to see into the spirit world. Many mirrors are used in movies and cartoons in order to see into the spirit world. Walt Disney is infamous for portraying mirrors in this way.”

For more information on this, and to see some creepy pictures, see this article.

5) Astral projection practitioners get stuck in mirrors.

Posted on a forum:

“If you are astral projecting, have an out-of-body-experience and you move through a mirror you get trapped in a parallel plane. Very hard to get out of, most get out when the natural body awakens and you are sucked back.”

“I’ve heard of more than one astral projector getting stuck in a mirror.”
6) Bloody Mary ‘game’ and folklore

Do not let children or anyone play this game! Chanting “Bloody Mary” is said to conjure up a demon from a mirror, so much so that it is a well known ‘game’. Explain to children how bad this is. The best way to do that is to watch the Interview with an Ex-Vampire interview (warning, there are references to doing horrible things with children).

Also be very sure to burn all ouija boards. Many people have been cursed after playing this game.

7) The superstition that breaking a mirror brings seven years’ bad luck.

Maybe this is a warning from the demons to not do it?

8) Jews cover up mirrors after death.

Maybe in the old days, before vaccines prevented people from having spiritual eyes, people knew that mirrors could trap the spirit in the mirror, after the spirit left the body, as the astral projectors get stuck?

9) Demons seen in mirrors.

Comment on a forum:

“Many years ago I knew an antiques dealer, he had a mirror that he sold, the people that bought the mirror, returned it to him. The reason for this return, was that they didn’t like seeing other people in the mirror, people that weren’t there!”

10) Full length mirrors are too cheap.

Recently when we were looking for a full length mirror, we were rather surprised at how cheap they were. You can buy a really nice wooden one for just $50, and simple ones for just $8.

Since the evil ones own the printing presses and don’t care about money, just serving evil spirits, subverting people and getting access to children, we think it not unlikely that some mirror-making companies are owned by the reptilians and/or Illuminati, and they are deliberately making them available at a cheap price, to encourage more people to put full length mirrors in bedrooms, so that beings with long, black capes and Quaker hats and red, glowing eyes can come into the room.

11) They are building more and more houses and condominiums with NO door between the bedroom and bathroom, ensuring that there is no barrier between a large mirror and the bed. Even luxury condominiums worth hundreds of thousands of dollars do this!

12) The book of Enoch: Fallen Angels taught Men to make Mirrors

“Moreover Azazyel, taught men to make swords, knives, shields, breastplates, the fabrication of mirrors, and the workmanship of bracelets and ornaments, the use of paint, the beautifying of the eyebrows, the use of stones of every valuable and select kind, and all sorts of dyes, so that the world became altered.”

Chapter 8. 1. (Azazyel is Lucifer’s aide-de-camp General).

————–

Final Comment

It makes sense that the bigger the mirror, the bigger the demon that can walks out of it. I imagine it would have been hard or maybe impossible for the being who appeared to the man on Halloween night, to have walked out through a small face mirror. The thought of aristocracy comes to mind, and all the giant mirrors they have all over their houses. These are the people who need our prayers the most as they are so often controlled by the forces of evil, and helping them to free themselves from demonic control is crucial to freeing ourselves and creating Heaven on Earth. For example, read the true story of the statue that came to life in the grounds of an aristocrat’s mansion.

Please remove all mirrors from your bedroom, if you can, and put some bible verses on all mirrors that you keep, and see what difference it makes to your happiness and wellbeing.

Please tell your friends and family about this. Imagine the huge difference it will make to the world when creepy beings and demons cannot get into people’s houses so easily!

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(Rassimov)

[Blackpill] Feminists now openly embracing the PATRIARCHY, ded srs

Female friends at FDS are now openly rejecting equality between the sexes in favor of a patriarchal model and even suggesting to split the bill on a date should be a immediate diqualifier. Strong independent women now expect old fashioned chivalry, admitting that the third world, unlike cucked northern Europe, is actually more sane when it comes dating, since the role of a man is expected to be that of a protector and provider, otherwise he is low value.

image

Remember, most of the world is pro-FDS The haters complaining about female dating strategy methods are all from the Anglosphere or Europe, and/or cannot afford to date. Don't forget, the vast majority of the world is structured in such a way where it is a given that the man is the provider and pursuer in the relationship. And this is not a new phenomenon, this has been the case for thousands of years, as women have always been the prize-for our femininity, ability to bear children, cleverness, the joy we bring to a household, our mothering skills, our homemaking, our diplomacy, fostering community relations, our beauty, our intelligence, our strength, and so on. Men, who do not carry children for nine months nor breastfeed, historically took on the role of providing resources so

image

The so-called "50-50" started with the completely shitty argument of "well you wanted equality, didn't you?" Women wanted equal civil rights, not a situation where the man objectively benefits even more than before.

tl;dr: In the olden times the alpha leader got to fuck all the women; in modern times women get to fuck the alpha leader.

(TheBasedCel)

In patriarchy men are viewed as expendible, this is why you should join my neo-patriarchy where the man is at the top.

(yeshuallah)

That's their endgame, to return to the bleak period of humankind's history when only few males reproduced.

(Rassimov)

A lot of tradcels here simply cannot understand that polygamy, not monogamy, is the defining feature of a patriarchal society.

(Cybersex is our hope)

Yes. Many don't Want to understand that women just go from feminists to traditionalists and viceversa to get the highest benefits from men. Femininity is the problem, not feminism. Women never gave a shit about principles. They only care about pragmatic self interests and many radfems will simply transition to trad con as chameleons as soon as the new right wing order replaces leftism in the western world. Many tradcels idiots will fall for the trap and start attacking fellowcels. JFL at thinking foids would have waged war against us with a sword and ready to fight like the disposable sex fights

(based_meme)

JFL if you don't think these are post wall roasties virtue signalling to ensare a dumb betabuxx.

Yeah, fool the idiot into thinking he's valued, so you can leech off of him while getting dicked by chads and tyrones on the side.

Kill yourselves, you fucking cunts.

Vox Day #wingnut #racist #crackpot #dunning-kruger voxday.blogspot.com

The Alt Right is of the political right in both the American and the European sense of the term. Socialists are not Alt Right. Progressives are not Alt Right. Liberals are not Alt Right. Communists, Marxists, Marxians, cultural Marxists, and neocons are not Alt Right.
The Alt Right is an ALTERNATIVE to the mainstream conservative movement in the USA that is nominally encapsulated by Russel Kirk's 10 Conservative Principles, but in reality has devolved towards progressivism. It is also an alternative to libertarianism.
The Alt Right is not a defensive attitude and rejects the concept of noble and principled defeat. It is a forward-thinking philosophy of offense, in every sense of that term. The Alt Right believes in victory through persistence and remaining in harmony with science, reality, cultural tradition, and the lessons of history.
The Alt Right believes Western civilization is the pinnacle of human achievement and supports its three foundational pillars: Christianity, the European nations, and the Rule of Law.
The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration.
The Alt Right is anti-globalist. It opposes all groups who work for globalist ideals or globalist objectives.
The Alt Right is anti-equalitarian. It rejects the idea of equality for the same reason it rejects the ideas of unicorns and leprechauns, noting that human equality does not exist in any observable scientific, legal, material, intellectual, sexual, or spiritual form.
The Alt Right is scientodific. It presumptively accepts the current conclusions of the scientific method (scientody), while understanding a) these conclusions are liable to future revision, b) that scientistry is susceptible to corruption, and c) that the so-called scientific consensus is not based on scientody, but democracy, and is therefore intrinsically unscientific.
The Alt Right believes identity > culture > politics.
The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.
The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war.
The Alt Right doesn't care what you think of it.
The Alt Right rejects international free trade and the free movement of peoples that free trade requires. The benefits of intranational free trade is not evidence for the benefits of international free trade.
The Alt Right believes we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children.
The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.
The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.

TL;DR: The Alt Right is a Western ideology that believes in science, history, reality, and the right of a genetic nation to exist and govern itself in its own interests.

The patron saint of conservatives, Russell Kirk, wrote: "The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal."

This is no longer true, assuming it ever was. The great line of demarcation in modern politics is now a division between men and women who believe that they are ultimately defined by their momentary opinions and those who believe they are ultimately defined by their genetic heritage. The Alt Right understands that the former will always lose to the latter in the end, because the former is subject to change.

Kai Peter Chang #sexist quora.com

World Wide Web: What is it like being a man on a dating site?

World Wide Web: What is it like being a man on a dating site?
Follow-up on What is it like being a woman on a dating site?
32 ANSWERS
Kai Peter Chang
Kai Peter Chang, Thief of Hearts
Updated Jan 3, 2016
Online dating is perfectly symbolized by the very act of sex and fertilization itself: - one egg surrounded by millions of furiously squirming sperm all trying to get in. Nearly every sperm will die trying, with the exception of the lucky one whose combination of attributes (strength & stamina) and starting position happen to connect with the egg.

Great deal for the egg, lousy deal for the individual sperm.

But don't take my word for it.

Someone actually RAN a multi-month experiment on this very subject matter with a spread of fake profiles, male and female of varying levels of physical attractiveness. The results were as expected, but very shocking for those who are unfamiliar with the world of hot women and female hypergamy.

Original Post on the experiment:
http://jonmillward.com/blog/attr...

Sharply-worded commentary by a pickup blog on the results:
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2...

TL;DR: A man in the top 5 percentile of looks will pull less interest than a Plain Jane middle-of-the-distribution female, and for guys who do NOT cut model-level cheekbones and 6'0+ height, the statistics are far grimmer.


?

Excerpt:

As we can see, the two hottest girls are cleaning up in the attention sweepstakes. The two hottest men get a few bites, but because they are men and have no personal concept of the sheer volume of sexual attention that hot women experience during their brief window of prime fertility, they think they are Kings of Maine.
Handsome Joe: “Hey, Emma, I got eight messages this week! I’m in demand!”
Exquisite Emma: “Oh, uh, hee hee… that’s great Joe!”
Handsome Joe: “How many did you get?”
Exquisite Emma: “128.”
Handsome Joe:

?

...

This is not to say that women don’t care about looks; only that women compartmentalize looks along with other, less physically tangible male characteristics that they are subconsciously attracted to in men. Less facially gifted men with game should be heartened by these online results: they show that a tight email message that exhibits the qualities of the preselected alpha male can draw the interest of cute girls who might otherwise dismiss these men based solely on their photos.

==================

Andrew Ross Long is correct that a man who desires a nonzero results from dating websites must invest substantial time for even modest replies. The promise that online dating would help you "save time" by helping you connect with thousands of local singles is an illusion, an illusion sold to introverted nerds eager to buy the notion that they can insulate themselves the terrifying task of approaching a woman they find desirable in person and risk rejection.

Any women you may find desirable online is likely bombarded by thousands of other suitors JUST LIKE YOU making similar approaches, and your message sits aside thousands of others like it in her inbox. She cannot date all of them, and it is almost certain you are not the tallest, smartest, funniest or most-accomplished guy who approaches her.

At 6'0 and (I hope) a reasonably well-written profile, including a full spread of photos (with the year they were taken so it's clear I'm not banking on an old perfectly shot image) and here are my stats:
* three to four visitors a week on average
* one or two incoming messages every six months
* historically, 100% of my girlfriend/long-term-dating relationships came from live pulls (met at a mutual friend's party, conference, grocery store, nonprofit fundraiser gala, etc.)

If you are shorter than me (which 95% of men are), have more blandly-written/ boring profile, I imagine you'd get even worse response rates.

Overall conclusion: ROI for men on dating sites is TERRIBLE.


BONUS ADVICE:

For most men, those hours spent browsing profiles and sending witty messages could be far better spent volunteering at a local nonprofit (which skew strongly toward female staff & volunteers anyway). There, you actions will be helping their the local community you live in while meeting other charitably-minded females in a relaxed, non-sexually-charged environment.

Teach a group of underprivileged kids a new skill, organize a blood drive (disclosure: I volunteer at the Red Cross so I am biased), lead a fundraiser on behalf of a battered women's shelter, tutor recent immigrants English so they can seize better opportunities.

Any of these activities puts you in the midst of good, wholesome women and allows introverts to comfortably get to know women as people, not sexual prospects jostling alongside other more aggressive men who see them as mating rivals.

The world needs men who step up and in so doing, you end up on the radar of women who may have never given your dating profile a second glance. but, having seen the good you do with their own eyes, desire you because in her view, you are a MAN who is a caring pillar of the community and a good prospective partner.

A win-win for all, I think. Certainly a far better ROI than messaging women OKCupid who will, statistically, never get back to you.

Samantha Allen #fundie unpitchable.tumblr.com

i’m a misandrist. that means i hate men. i’m not a cute misandrist. i don’t have a fridge magnet that says, “boys are stupid, throw rocks at them.” my loathing cannot be contained by a fridge magnet.

i am not an equality feminist. i don’t believe that an asymmetrical world will be cured by polite obsequence to male-dominated systems. i am not a liberal humanist. i don’t believe that i need to stand up for men when they’ve been standing on top of everyone else.

misandry is not a political program; it’s a stance. i don’t care whether hating men is a good or bad feminist strategy (and i care even less what men think about misandry). i don’t think i have a responsibility to change the world. i think i have a responsibility to survive.

imagine being born into a world where your experiences are not represented, where your work is undervalued, where your body is always open for comment, where your friends are routinely harassed and abused, and where this situation will literally be your reality for your entire life. if you’re a woman, you don’t have to imagine that world because you already live in it.

if you’re a man, you never have and never will live in that world. but try to imagine what it feels like. i’ll tell you: when i think about the kind of world we live in, i feel simultaneously hopeless and infuriated and i oscillate so quickly between those two emotional extremes that i literally start to get dizzy.

being a woman in this world feels like getting buried alive. think about that. think about feeling that every day.

why do i have to answer the question “why do i hate men?” when men don’t even stop to ask why they have always hated women. i have to answer the question because men can’t tolerate for one second the sort of contempt they’ve had for women for thousands of years.

why do i hate men? because life is short. my life is getting shorter by the day and i want to fill it with women. in this sinking ship of a world, i just want to enjoy a tiny little space, a room, if you will, of my own. i want that room to be full of women and free from ego, hierarchy, sexual advances, and violence. i hate men because i can’t even have that fucking room without them knocking on the walls. you have the entire fucking house. go play in it. find something else to do.

i hate men because it’s not my job to fix masculinity; it’s my job to heal from it and to be together with my sisters as we try to make it through a hostile world. and yet i am expected to patiently educate men on how not to be an asshole. here’s my only tip: stop spending so much time around men. they’re assholes.

i hate men because men hate me and the burden to take the high road should not fall on my shoulders.

i am friends with some men, yes. usually these are men who have some experience of marginalization (whether via their race, class, gender identity, sexual identity, what have you) or who have gone through the self-interrogation and relational deprogramming necessary to build meaningful community with women. you don’t just get to read a book and you’re golden. you have to get fucking baptized in menstrual blood as far as i’m concerned.

i hate men doesn’t mean i hate you. it means i hate your position in this world. it means i’m not obligated to like you. it means i don’t have to talk to you if i don’t want to. it means i get to have my space and i don’t have to dance for you, smile at you, or soothe you. and you can put up with me being wary of you, can’t you, because the world has a fucking red carpet waiting for you wherever you go.

Roko #fundie #crackpot #psycho rationalwiki.org

("Roko's Basilisk", an infamous post on LessWrong. It resulted in extreme distress in many of the readers. After four hours, cybercult leader Eliezer Yudkowsky purged the thread and all discussions of it, and would continue to delete any discussions of it for many years afterwards.)

Solutions to the Altruist's burden: the Quantum Billionaire Trick

Prerequisite concepts: Non-technical Introduction to the AI Deterrence Problem, And the winner is: Many-Worlds!

Followup to: The Altruist's Burden

One way to overcome the Altruist's burden problem is to stop being an altruist, to re-frame your impulses to help distant others as a bias rather than a preference. In the case of existential risks, there are additional reasons for doing this: firstly that the people who are helping you are the same as the people who are punishing you. (This is not the case for aid to the developing world). This is not an option that I personally like.

Another perfectly valid reaction is to just take the hit and accept that you will be taken advantage of as an altruist, but that it is worth it. This is also not an option that I personally like.

In this vein, there is the ominous possibility that if a positive singularity does occur, the resultant singleton may have precommitted to punish all potential donors who knew about existential risks but who didn't give 100% of their disposable incomes to x-risk motivation. This would act as an incentive to get people to donate more to reducing existential risk, and thereby increase the chances of a positive singularity. This seems to be what CEV (coherent extrapolated volition of humanity) might do if it were an acausal decision-maker.[1] So a post-singularity world may be a world of fun and plenty for the people who are currently ignoring the problem, whilst being a living hell for a significant fraction of current existential risk reducers (say, the least generous half). You could take this possibility into account and give even more to x-risk in an effort to avoid being punished. But of course, if you're thinking like that, then the CEV-singleton is even more likely to want to punish you... nasty. Of course this would be unjust, but is the kind of unjust thing that is oh-so-very utilitarian. It is a concrete example of how falling for the just world fallacy might backfire on a person with respect to existential risk, especially against people who were implicitly or explicitly expecting some reward for their efforts in the future. And even if you only think that the probability of this happening is 1%, note that the probability of a CEV doing this to a random person who would casually brush off talk of existential risks as "nonsense" is essentially zero.

A more exciting (and to my mind more preferable) way to overcome the problem is to quickly become so rich that you can turn charity into business by single-handedly changing the faces of high-impact industries. Elon Musk is probably the best example of this. I swear that man will single-handedly colonize mars, as well as bringing cheap, reliable electric vehicles to the consumer. And he'll do it at the same time as making even more money. The key to this tactic is scale. You can't contribute 0.00002% of the effort to colonize space or mitigate existential risks and reap 0.00001% of the reward: you get 0 or even negative reward if your contribution is below some threshold.

The quantum billionaire trick

But how can an individual do an Elon Musk job on existential risk? Not everyone is a good enough entrepreneur to drop out of grad school and come out with a $300 million startup before their classmates even have PhDs. Well, there is another way to make $300,000,000. Start with $30,000, and using a quantum random number generator, gamble it on the forex markets at a 10,000:1 ratio. Then in the branches where your gamble pays off, start an AGI company, hire the best people and build an FAI yourself. You could hire existing existential risk charities as consultants when you required their services. You can increase your chance of success in at least some branches by tossing a quantum coin to make key decisions. You could take, say, 50% of the universe for yourself and donate the other 50% to humanity. In your half, you can then create many independent rescue simulations of yourself up to August 2010 (or some other date), who then get rescued and sent to an optimized utopia.

You can also use your resources to acausally trade with a CEV-like singleton that might otherwise punish you for being a partial x-risk reducer, as mentioned before.

You can also use resources to acausally trade [2] with all possible unfriendly AIs [3] that might be built, exchanging resources in branches where you succeed for the uFAI sparing your life and "pensioning you off" with a tiny proportion of the universe in branches where it is built. Given that unfriendly AI is said by many experts to be the most likely outcome of humanity's experiment with AI this century, having such a lifeboat is no small benefit. Even if you are not an acausal decision-maker and therefore place no value on rescue simulations, many uFAIs would be acausal decision-makers. Though it seems to me that most people one-box on Newcomb's Problem, and rescue simulations seems decision-theoretically equivalent to Newcomb.

A win-win solution

What I like most about this option is that it is a win-win interaction between you and the rest of humanity, rather than a lose-win interaction. Humanity benefits by having a much higher chance of survival in 1 in 10,000 of the branches of the wavefunction, and you benefit by getting the lifeboat, removing the possibility of punishment and getting the rescue simulations. It also avoids the bitterness inherent in the first option, and the sucker-ness inherent in the second. That nobody thought of win-win solutions to existential risk before may be a testament to zero-sum bias.

1: One might think that the possibility of CEV punishing people couldn't possibly be taken seriously enough by anyone to actually motivate them. But in fact one person at SIAI was severely worried by this, to the point of having terrible nightmares, though ve wishes to remain anonymous. The fact that it worked on at least one person means that it would be a tempting policy to adopt. One might also think that CEV would give existential risk reducers apositive rather than negative incentive to reduce existential risks. But if a post-positive singularity world is already optimal, then the only way you can make it better for existential risk-reducers is to make it worse for everyone else. This would be very costly from the point of view of CEV, whereas punishing partial x-risk reducers might be very cheap.

2: Acausal trade is somewhat speculative: it is the idea that you can influence causally disconnected parts of the multiverse by doing simulations of them. A simpler explanation of how you can affect a uFAI in this way is to think about Nick Bostrom's Simulation Argument from the point of view of the uFAI. If you historically played a quantum lottery that definitely paid off in some branches of the wavefunction, then the uFAI will assign some probability to being in a simulation run by you, if that is what you pre-committed to doing (and if you actually follow through on your precommitment: the uFAI can test this by simulating you).

3: This idea is in part due to Rolf Nelson's idea of using the simulation hypothesis to acausally trade with uFAIs.Read his blog to find out more.

I'm a ramblin' man #announcement

This'll probably be my last Shy Says post here. After this, they'll have their own separate blog hosted on the site.

Also, I typed this up more or less stream-of-conscious, and afterward I put aside tags around the parts where I strayed too far from my original topic. I haven't done anything resembling proofreading any of it. But I'm letting it stand as it is for now.

Something I really want to do but don't know how to go about even figuring out where to start is making public all of the statistics that I've collected from what the comment filter evolved into. Funny how The Frog thought he 'won' because he made me waste my time making that filter. In reality, I love statistics, especially corpus statistics, and I obviously love programing, so it should go without saying that I legitimately enjoyed making the filter, so much so that it's morphed into something well beyond its original purpose. It now analyzes comments in other ways besides detecting Le Frog and other trolls and even does the same kind of analysis on quotes too. Unfortunately, it ain't easy to put all of the data and statistics together in a user-friendly form that's easy to read, browse, and manipulate so you guys can explore and have fun with it.

That's not to mention the problem of organizing the code and getting it into a form that can even run on the current host. For the curious, the filter started its life as a well-organized and structurally coherent set of three VB module files and one C# class file. The C# class was later translated into VB when the quote comment page was, since it is closely tied to it. It originally intercepted comments with unusually high, low, or average troll scores and sent a copy of them to my FSTDT email so I could add them to the corpus of training material. It would then discard comments and perform a progressive IP ban if they had a high score, or returns comments back to the quote-comment page code to be posted as normal if they had a low or average score.)

Now it's become a disorganized, ad-hoc set of seven VB modules, three Object Pascal* unit files (compiled in either Delphi or FreePascal depending on the operating system I'm compiling on), one Ada file mostly written by my BFF / modly minion Mikey, and two JavaScript files that I wrote to run in Node.js when I was testing out how well it worked with databases (the verdict on that: comme ci, comme ça). Code in three two of those languages won't even run on the current host. I could probably get the Object Pascal to compile with Delphi.NET after some adjustments. The code only started branching away from things like "written in one language" and " organized structure" after I started analyzing comments for fun and the whole thing was taking on a life of its own. Around that time, it also somehow began to take on a secondary role as personal playground for experimenting with programming languages.

[aside]*I'm using Object Pascal here in the sense that a lot of Pascal-dabblers nowadays use it, i.e. to describe a modern and quasi-standard dialect or "style" of writing Pascal code that can be compiled by at least both Delphi and FreePascal, and possibly other Pascal languages (e.g. GNU Pascal) if you adhere to a stricter subset of "Object Pascal" in this sense. Confusingly, Object Pascal is also originally what Borland called the last couple versions of its Pascal compiler for DOS (whose very last version also apparently had a hilariously bad, half-assed Windows port). Indeed, this old-school Object Pascal is essentially Turbo Pascal with object orientation (or a ridiculous attempt thereat in the case of the Windows port). Aside from their core syntax and lexicon, that Object Pascal and "Object Pascal" in the sense here are dramatically different. Most code more complex than "Hello world" written in the latter is not compatible with the original Object Pascal in any useful sense unless it was intentionally written to be. And that's your programming-language history lesson for today.[/aside]

In addition to being written in as many languages as your average Dutchman can speak, another fairly major hurdle to making this little pet project public is that both the quotes and comments I've fed it to analyze (originally "train") and the interesting parts of the analyses thereof are stored on my private server in an SQLite database. Our current host Does Not Allow Using SQLite, despite their terms of use saying nothing to that effect or even suggestive of it. Apparently SQLite is Too Forbidden to even do that. TIL SQLite is Lord Voldemort.

Only the word and word co-occurrence probability data needed for the filter to run was stored and updated here on FSTDT in a secondary SQL Server database. (It still is, but hasn't been updated in a while and isn't currently being used.) This probability data is basically just how likely (or unlikely) certain words and co-occurrences of words are to occur in 'good' and 'bad' comments. These probabilities are the product of other statistical and meta-statistical analysis stored in the external SQLite database.

Getting the probability data used by the filter requires collecting statistics about a corpus of training data, the larger the corpus the better. Those statistics are stored so they can be subjected to statistical analysis of their own, and then those statistics are subject to further statistictaal analysis. That's two layers of meta-statistics. I originally decided against storing this latter data on the FSTDT server because I vastly overestimated the amount of space that would be required to store statistics about statistics pertaining to statistics of statistics about tens of thousands of words and the frequency they co-occur with other words. (How could you not??) Yo dawg, I heard you liked statistics, so I gave you some statistics collected from your statistics about your statistics...

We call this madness naive Bayesian filtering. To be a "non-naive" Bayesian filter, you must venture even further down this metastatistical rabbit hole.

TL;DR: Bayes Theorem is postmodern statistics.

Anyway, I think the corpus in the training database is a good representative crosscut of the actual FSTDT database. There's tons of cool, fascinating, and just plain weird stuff to gleam from it, like the fact that the fundie index of a post and the number of times the word 'when' appears in it appear to stand in direct correlation. Why?? Anyone wanna fathom a guess? Quotes also have way more hapax legomena (words that occur only once in a corpus) than comments do, but I don't find that nearly as interesting, because there are already a couple of very likely explanations. One, certain fundies absolutely love to invent "words" like abortuarydeathscortagandistism.* Two, a whooole lot of fundies just can't spell. Perhaps they try to hide that fact with word puree like homocommunofascofemininazis?**

[aside]*Protip: English is a mostly Isolating language, so we Anglophones generally prefer to create names for novel concepts by compounding existing words together into phrases instead of creating new words by adding prefixes and suffixes to other words or word roots. For example, to describe the practice of treating medical problems with things that actually exist in reality (as opposed to quackpot woo-woo), we coined the term evidence-based medicine instead of inventing a completely new word like vercomadhealancy (ver-com-ad-heal-anc(e)-cy, lit. "truth~reality | with~using | from~by | heal | having the quality of | the activity or state of"), no matter how much cooler and more phonoaesthetic vercomadhealancy sounds.

If that gloss is incoherent to you, read it backwards: "the activity or state of | having the quality of | heal(ing) | by | using | reality." In English, the order that a word's morphemes follow is generally a mirror image of the order that words usually follow in clauses and sentences. In linguistic parlance, English clauses and morphemes branch in opposite directions: clauses are head-initial (branch to the right of their head), while words head-final (branch to the left of their head). Oh, and only one morpheme of that word, heal, can stand alone, while all three of evidence-based medicine can. And that's your linguistics lesson of the day. And this is exactly why I love corpus statistics: it fuses my three favorite subjects: linguistics, mathematics, and in the modern age, computers.[/aside]

[aside]**True fact: I'm also a terrible speller, but I actually heed the little red underlines that tend to pop up a lot in the things I write.[/aside]

Monarchieliga #wingnut #fundie monarchieliga.de

(tl;dr: They want to drag Germany back to the Middle Ages. Literally.)

100 Day Programme of the Monarchist Movement in Germany

Preface

The current dire situation of Germany, Europe and the entire world urgently demands the immediate cessation of Experiment Democracy. Therefore, the Monarchist Movement will restore liberty, law and order and bring about in the following measures within the next 100 days in order to set the path for the restoration of the German Empire.

The Programme

Removal of Democrat Rule via the installation of the Imperial Governor
* Installation of the Regnum Teutonicum, as dominion of the German King in the territory of Germany and Austria
* Dissolution of all “state” organs, incl. parties, trade unions, bussiness associations, clubs,
* Replacement of the “states”, “federated states” and “free states”, all their agencies and subordinate partitions, organisations etc. by the traditional estates of the Realm,
* Appointment of a Reichstag consisting of the representatives of the Christian nobility of the German nation; whose language of publication is Latin;
* Termination of the entire body of law on German ground since 31.12.1802,
* Eternal prohibition of the ideas of the French Revolution and of Democracy,
* NATO and other occupier troops are heartily encouraged to get out of the country within 14 days,
* Dissolution of the EU,
* Restoration of war and peace as terms of international law as well as realities of foreign politics,
* Unilateral declaration of peace of the Imperium Sacrum, declaration of a global Pax Imperii according to the status quo of 31.12.1802,
* Invitation of Liechtenstein, Belgium, Netherlands, Alsace, Lorraine, Burgundy, Provence, Italy, Croatia, Slovenia, Hungary, Transylvania, Slovakia, Buchenland (Translator’s Note: Bukowina, a historical region that was once part of the Habsburg monarchy and now is part of Romania and Ukraine), Czechia, Silesia, Poland, Prussia to be integrated into the Empire with the possibillity of retaining an empire-royal regnum. All partitions and estates of the Empire enjoy Autonomy. Only the partitions of the regnum teutonicum are vassals of the German King.

Installation of the German King
* After the restoration of the law, the Reichstag appoints the German King.
* He is souverain, supreme souzerain and supreme legal authority of the German Regnum,
* after previous spiritual probation, he is consecrated and anointed in the Magdeburg Cathedral by the Primas Germaniae,
* the instution of the Elector-Princes is suspended, the Elector-Princes are removed from their duties,
* Reichstag, Reichsrat, Reichskammergericht and Reichshofrat remain in place.

The Rights of the King
* The German King is elected for a life-time
* he may nominate his successor to the Imperial Assembly, which he may have elected in his life-time,
* he suggests the Bishop appointments to the Primas Germaniae/to a orthodox head of the Church,
* he administers duchys, earldoms, marchies and territories without a lord,
* he leads the army, the yeomen and all armed forces,
* he warrants the protection of non-subjects, of foreigners and travellers,
* he is the owner of the authority over toll, coinage and market,
* he possesses the exclusive authority to build palantines and strongholds,
* he appoints the consuls and royal ambassadors,
* he possesses the authority over the traffic roads, especially the Hellweg (Translator’s note: major far-trade roads in Medieval times)

Restoration of the Imperial German Church
* termination of all state church treaties
* strict audition of the bishops, nuntii, delegates and prelates
* dissolution of the Lutheran provincial churches, confiscation of all their wealth and all their properties.
* installation of a non-modernist bishop in apostolic succession in agreement with the Imperial Governor as the Arch-bishop and Primas Germaniae in Magdeburg.
* The blameless Lutheran clergy may be consecrated as priests by the Primas Germaniae. Those for whom this is not possible cannot remain within the clerical estate.
* The same applies to religious educators. Only priests may become religious educators at universities and seminaries.
* Ban of all cults and sects, even those of alleged Christian alignment.
* Sufferance of Islam. The holdings of islamic associations are property of the German King,

Restoration of the Status as Subjects
* Restoration of personal right by establishment of the status as subjects.
* Legal and subject capable as freemen on German ground are only subjects of the German King and of his tenants.
* Only the baptised may be vassals and subjects
* Every freeman on German ground can subordinate himself as a subject to the German King.
* Non-subjects enjoy tolerance.

Restoration of the Feudal Order
* The German King restores the duchies, marchies, earldoms, Erzstifte, Hochstifte (Translator's note: territories ruled by a prince-archbishop and by a prince-bishop, respectively), abbeys, cities, dominions and villages as they were on 31.12.1802.
* The Ecclesiastical Principalities are restored.
* The estates that have perished since the beginning of the Reformation are restored according to the principle of opportunity.
* Investiture of the duchies and other lordships by the German King.
* The Ecclesiastic Estates of the Realm are canonically invested according to suggestion and after confirmation by the German King.
* The secular vassalages are heritable.
* The law of reversion comes into force necessarily if no direct male or female heirs exist.
* Rights from vassalage are forfeited in the case of loss of freedom.
* Rights from vassalage are forfeited if no heirs exist.

Restoration of Law and Order
* Restoration of freedom of mind, thought and speech via the establishment of a strict censorship office that is part of the Imperial Church
* Irreversible loss of freedom for propagators of democratic and pornographic materials.
* Discontinuation of all public attorney’s offices.
* Discontinuation of the criminal judgements and of civil law.
* The rights of judgement are property of the German King and his vassals and are bestowed as vassalages.
* Extensive suspension of long-term imprisonment.
* Demolition of the penitaries and transformation in monastries and hermitages
* Establishment of stocks and court pavillon at every place of judgement
* Grave crimes and repeated crimes are punished with death.
* After death penalty, obligation for prayer and pilgrimmage take center-stage as elements of legal custom.
* The fulfilment of the obligations for prayer and pilgrimmage are controlled electronically.
* The done prayers enter into the church’s treasure.
* Non-subjects are punished according to the law of their own realm.

Restoration of the Family
* Registries of personal status and all public registries are administered by the Imperial Church.
* Only canonical priests have access to the registries.
* Divorce is discontinued.
* Persons without family status lose the status as subjects.
* Adultery and procuration are punished as capital crimes.
* Mothers and wives are on life-long fully-paid leave for the purpose of childrearing work. If the children have moved from home, they are allowed to dedicate themselves to charitable work.
* Pr0hibition of contraception and family planning

Creation of a Germany Worth Living In
* Demoliton of all Autobahnen and Schnellstraßen (Translator’s note: different kinds of German highways)
* Demolition of the large-scale housing settlements
* Restoration of an expansive railway net fitting with the landscape.
* Restoration of the Imperial Forests, primordial and border forests, which have to remain completely free of roads.
* Restoration of the rivers and creeks, their meanders and meadows.
* Strict prohibition of factory farming and of industrial agriculture.
* Restoration of the free Catholic peasant estate, which will completely re-cultivate the Regnum.

The Restoration of Christian Love’s Labour
* Discontinuation of all forced social insurances.
* Subjects only have claims towards their sovereign, according to their estate-status.
* All forms of social welfare are transformed in voluntary charity.
* Promotion of Christian love’s labour via the transfer of all hospitals and care institutions to the Church. All services are offered voluntarily and free of charge.

Stopping the Cultural Catastrophe
* Each estate of the Realm is allowed to maintain broadcast and television channels.
* Exclusive promotion of Christian culture and Christian creators of culture.
* Mandate to the German College to build a Museum of Democracy.
* Refounding of the medieval faculties.
* Restoration of the ideals of unity of Christian faith, Church doctrine and ascetic lifestyle at the German university
* Ban on political science, sociology, psychoanalysis, Darwinism and socialism.
* Decan or rector of the university is the Ordinarius of Theology.
* Division into Protestant and Catholic theology is discontinued.
* Language of education and lecture at the faculties is Latin.
* Latin is a compulsory subject from 3rd Grade onwards at all Gymnasien (Translator’s note: a kind of secondary school in Germany, not gyms)
* Teachers and priests are trained at Church seminaries.

[…]

Completed on the Day of Memory of the Holy Emperor Henry in the Year of Salvation 2005.

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist incels.co

The RedPill is the Purest Form of Female Worship

By Professor B. McGirlsex, PhD in INCELDOM (Cambridge, UK), M.B.B.S (Kings College, London, UK), BSc (Hons) (APNP)

* The folly of TRP

The redpill - though it acknowledges most of the ancient wisdom enshrined in the Sacred Scientific Blackpill texts - it has one fatal flaw, it promotes Maxxxing inorder to win a foids approval. According to this logic it would mean that you have automatically made foids more valuable than yourself and hence you have to Maxxx (gymmaxxx, wagecuckmaxxx, daygamemaxxx e.t.c) inorder to "earn" a foids sex & attention - things that are naturally entitled to men and all men have an inalienable Right to pussy. By taking the redpill you automatically pedestalize foids into being perfect beings who do not have to do any self improvement whatsoever and simultaneously you relegate men into being inferior beings who have to work hard and maxxx inorder to just get a little bit of foid action.

* The Redpill creates more incels.

foids will see lots of redpillers supplicating themselves to them and essentially treating them like deities and trying all the tricks under the sun to win their approval - this inflates their egos and also raises their standards to astronomical unnatural unattainable standards. Meaning they will disqualify the majority of men who seek romantic LTR's with them and these men end up becoming infected with the Black Plague known as Inceldom.

TL:DR - The RedPill is Pure Poison

Vogon Poetry Award

Zero_Sum #sexist incelistan.net

I was trying to make this below into a sort of haiku.

Modern Woman.

She only loves me for my money, occupation, social influence, property, bank account, and wallet, she calls this sexual usury love or romance. I bend her over on the bed and slide a credit card between her legs, in her wet ■■■■ I make my biological deposit within financial exchange where her internal lubricant greases my ball sack on the bed. She tells me that she’ll love me no matter what but I know this is untrue upon becoming financially bankrupt.

I’m out of cash on hand where I need to go to the local ATM machine for the vaginal promise land.

Come on baby, take me to the vaginal promise land, look here, I have ample amounts of abundant cash on hand!

Am I financially solvent enough for you, here’s my yearly income statement as proof!

I see the dollar signs in her eyes and that is the only way I can get access between her thighs. I pull up a credit card key pad and hook it up to her clitoris, as I push the buttons it stimulates upon climax.

I want to slap her on the ass but she says that I must be of a very particular specific socio-economic class.

I want her to like me for just being me, but she keeps insisting how love or romance is not free proclaiming that I must pay an adequate sized fee.

Come on baby, I’m just looking for some warmth all alone here by myself, why does it always have to come down to economic individual self worth?

Upon bending her naked body and ass over the bed as I cop a feel on her breasts, she turned around to me with a smile happily, “My love is not free for it is only to rent and own with additional fees. I accept Mastercard, VISA, traveler’s checks, cash, and Bitcoin. If I should ever become impregnated by you I fully expect a diamond ring on my finger per sexual contract and with the children I will own the household as I linger.”

I felt like I was buying livestock or a stubborn mule ass as part of the sexual financial negotiations, but in the end I just wanted to get my dick wet. Having an understanding of each other holding her naked ass with both of my hands with the sexual contract in mind I was all set.

As the sexual intercourse proceeded she kept yelling moaning out upon orgasming, love me, love me! All I could think to myself is that with this hooker or prostitute overtime there will be an endless amount of additional fees.

Upon reflection of future marriage with this prostitute I am merely buying, financially completing, and purchasing the final deed of sexual property which she could end randomly at any time. Why can’t I afford her physical and mental affections on a basic dime!?

[User inserts pic of woman on cell phone with sheep surrounding her, chemtrails above, and tons of ads behind her]

8chan posters #sexist reddit.com

image

(1st poster)

“it's insecurity. youll need to fix that before you get laid”

Yeah, this is the catalyst to solving all my problems. After this I'm guessing I should just be myself and wait for my time.
Fuck Off, If I wanted to hear meaningless platitudes. I'd talk to literally anyone else doesnt post on a depression related imageboard in a misguided. futile attempt to "help"' when you're really stroking your own ego at the fact that you're more successful than the people here.

That's not even what made me angry. What makes me angry is the implication that it’s a character defect on part of someone who"s unable to start or maintain a sex life, that it’s something morally wrong. If I can't get laid, it must be due to insecurity. manipulation, or desperation. etc. It must be something wrong with me because only emotionally secure people in healthy relationships have sex, right? Good people can get sex, and if I can't. that must mean I'm a bad person.

That's why all male dating advice is pandered under the waise of self-help; that an unattractive man has flaws in character or stature that he must work on before he can be in a relationship. If he still doesnt get laid,
that means he needs to keep working on himself until he does and never express his frustration about the effort he has to exert because that is perceived by others as entitlement and will further stain his character
The ride never ends.

(2nd poster)

Have you ever wondered why men cant complain about sexual frustration without being defamed? This is the just world fallacy. We treat attractiveness like a moral value when it isnt.

The reality of modern dating can't be the way that it is. because if it did that means manipulative assholes who think women are inferior are getting laid. And any self-professed nice guy who complains about having woman problems must not really be nice and must actually be a manipulative and entitled ass. Beause if he were actually nice, it means that genuinely nice guys aren't getting laid.

So we see this veil of arguments: PUA doesn't work — its all made up lies and stories by losers on the internet. In the few cases it does work, those women are damaged, but it doesnt work on real, normal women. And in the few cases it does, it's all through lies and deception and manipulation and trickery. And in any other cases, it's all through rape.

And any time any guy complains that he had woman problems when he tried things the normal, conventional, friendly, nice guy way, it's because he's unwashed and hideous and unrealistically expects to succeed without taking the time to look good and learn basic social skills. But if he’s not like that, then it's because he's only appcoaching super-models instead of realistic average women. But if it's not that, then it’s because he’s actually desperate and sending out invisible desperation signals and turning women off. But if it’s not that, it’s because he’s actually an entitled misogynist and is sending out invisible entitlement signals and turning women off. But if it's not that, he's probably raping people.

And as we all know, women are intuitive and can detect evil manipulative men, objectifiers, and desperate creeps, all who think they don't have any external tells but they give off a subtle signal. That's why PUA doesn't work, and creepy loser nice guys aren't really nice women can detect it all with their super-powers.

DefyRule #fundie wnd.com

According to the most recent and comprehensive study on the actual percentage of people in the US who claim to be transgenders, less than 1/10th of 1% of the populace claim this perverse malady. Less than that claim to be bisexual. This study finds that altogether, less than 3% of the US claims to be one of these perverse, *** , *** , sick wackos. LESS THAN 3%!!!. How is it then, that there is not one damn christian or one damn red blooded American patriot who can get up off of their fat, lazy, self centered, apathetic and slave like butts and counter protest against these sickos, the muslims, and the illegals? Everyday I hear a god awful lot of complaining and yet not one overweight and pathetic American slave can rise up, let alone one hundred thousand. Christians are cowards! Present day Americans are cowards! You all are pathetic!!! When the illegals invaded and marched on our cities in 2007, I went to Charlotte, NC to counter protest. I was joined by approximately 30 other of my fellow citizens. 30 to 40 of us marched for OUR nation's sovereignty against over 3000 illegal criminal invaders. MY fellow citizens are some of the most cowardly and pathetic and lazy fat *** I have ever seen. You all deserve what is coming. You all deserve to be slaves to masses of uneducated, mongrel criminal invaders and you all deserve having the less than 3% sexual deviants being your masters, You bunch of damn self centered cowards!!!

fellofix #sexist incels.co

Women trying to be political is like fish trying to swim in a thick jelly-like substance. Why is this?

Women can not say true to their political beliefs, and are automatically biased, even more so than most men could ever be. Let's take democracy, government by the people and for the people, where the popular candidate wins. Women may initially look at this concept, and say "sure, this is good". But their tone will quickly chance when the people elect a 4/10, instead of the competing 7/10 candidate.

Women can not be of any political orientation, belief or ideology, because they will always trade their own values for Chad cock. Nationalist women are quick to give up their self-proclaimed "respect for the father/motherland", if this means selection by high SMV men. Overtly globalist, feminist and "liberal" women, the so-called "SJWs" will stop complaining about "oppression", "discrimination" and all perceived unjusts, if they would be chosen by a 6'5 with 9/10 face and a body of a Greek God.

TL;DR Women will always betray their politics when Chad comes into the picture.

OverBeforeItBegan #sexist incels.co

Claiming you have depression as a female should be considered a hate crime against incels

There is nothing worse than being mocked by a hole living life on "press x to win" mode who says that she has depression. If you're an above 1/10 female in the 21st century you can literally never experience any hardships. Since birth you were coddled by society, treated like a queen who can do no wrong. Whatever you do, wherever you go you'll always be able to find love from literally hundreds of guys worshiping you. Compare that to an incel who had to spend years in isolation, treated like a piece of shit solely because of his genes. Completely cast out of society because of something he has no control over.

There's this female I know from school saying she has depression because the whore got drunk and took drugs at a house party 2 years ago with strangers and got raped. She made a post about it on facebook, talking about how hard her life is. The comments that people left were absolute ragefuel. Everyone was talking about
how the poor, innocent victim didn't deserve it even though it's her fault for being fucking stupid.

I obviously don't condone rape, but I still fail to understand how getting raped as a female is such a traumatic experience. Wow, you took one extra dick from an ugly guy. Big deal. If anything, it only increases your natural vagina privileges tenfold. You'll pretty much be able to live the rest of your life living such a life that you would have made actual queens jealous.
It's a completely different story if you're a man. Your entire masculinity would be shattered. You'd be seen as a weak, pathetic cuck until the day you die. No man and especially no woman would ever see you as anything more than a little bitch. If you were to actually have the nerve to make a post about it on facebook you'd probably end up getting raped again.

TL;DR: Claiming to have depression as a hole because tutorial island asked you to perform a 2 button combo should be punishable by law.

Zipphy #fundie reddit.com

Comrade Stalin is highly respected because of the steady hand he guided the USSR with; he guaranteed it survival, prosperity, and liberty. The USSR was not affected by the market crashes that affected the West, the life expectancy continued to make leaps. education was prioritized and he rendered the USSR to be the first nation on Earth t practically eradicate illiteracy. Under his guidance, each person was guaranteed a job, housing, and food. Stalin's five year plans industrialized a chiefly agrarian state quickly and with no resemblance to the industrialization that took Capitalists countries through hell and back...so to say.

The matter of 'authoritarian' and 'libertarian' exist chiefly in bourgeois-sympathizer terminology. It imposes a POV and attempts to exploit it into an umbrella of ethical analysis--which is what Marx himself chastised (Mao, too); these terms are used by socially displaced 'intellectuals' (which garner respect simply for achieving arbitrary tasks) to reinforce the ideas of brutality under a Socialist leader. Every human wishes to be free, so by establishing the idea of Capitalism being 'Libertarian' and Socialism being 'Authoritarian' it creates a predisposed disposition on the topic itself. As for it being opinionated, well, everyone has different ideas of what freedom is, and what oppression is.

tl;dr: Stalin made great strides, and carried on the spirit of Lenin's revolution. Using 'authoritarianism' and 'libertarianism' as classifiers is practically opening the door to all the ridiculous claims about Socialism.

The fact is, is that post-revolution, there will be a large, new government. The Communist Party will simply have to reorganize society, guide us through our Socialist tenants, and defend the revolution. They will assure the Dictator of the Proletariat is upheld, and will safeguard us from outside forces. This sort of government is necessary after any revolution period; socialist ones, or not.

Also, dictator? Stalin gradually relinquished power--even when the people did not want him to! Stalin protected Socialism, and kept it alive. He was a marvelous man.

Trjjb #psycho reddit.com

Another guy is hitting on my girlfriend and I'm having trouble containing my urge to kill him.
I'm in a very vanilla relationship, which is something that suits both me and my girlfriend very well. We love each other very much, and plan on moving in together very soon.

And then there is this guy, sorta mutual "friend", that we often bump into on parties and shit. He's the definition of a Chad, muscular, cocky, et cetera. He hits on many "taken" girls quite often, and recently noticed that I also have a girlfriend. So far he's only talking shit, implying he's going to so-and-so fuck her. I never thought that anything like that would have any effect on me. I was wrong.

He never laid a finger on her, if he did, I would probably outright kill the fucker (already fought him once in the past and won), but she is feeling uneasy around him (She has mild haphephobia, and usually feels frightened when touched by anyone, with the exception being me and some close friends.) This is where it gets hard. I have never in my life despised anyone as much as this guy. The moment I lay my eyes on him, I'm immediately flooded by blind rage and urge to kill. It's quite frightening for me, because he hasn't really done anything yet, and I know that resorting to violence isn't going to bring anything good, but it's getting increasingly difficult to contain myself around this degenerate. I find myself anticipating the moment when he makes a move, just so I would have any excuse for murder.

More and more often my mind starts producing images of him raping my girlfriend, which fuels my rage even more. What is wrong with me? Is this a manifestation of some cuckold fantasy I've never known I had, or is it genuine hatred? I feel like a horrible person, because deep down I want him to violate and abuse her, so that I could retaliate with clear conscience. I have never had any anger issues or anything like that. This is the first time I've hated anyone so much.

TL;DR I want to kill a guy for saying some mean shit to my girlfriend

RopeIsMyLove #sexist #psycho incels.co

Spousal """rape""" should be legal.

Marriage essentially is exchange-agreement. Husband provides material support for his wife, wife gives him access to his holes. In past it was most common way of getting access to foids hole for majority of men.
The fact that the husband doesn't even has exclusive access to his wife's holes makes marriage redundant enough, but what's cucked is that a husband needs to beg his wife for permission to said holes.

tl;dr; Concept of spousal rape is incoherent and illogical, because act of marriage is an act of consent.

Sparrow's Song #sexist incels.co

We cannot restore the old patriarchy, it wouldn't fix our faces anyway... We need a Neo-Patriarchy.

Consider a society with nationalized healthcare, facial surgery for anyone who needs it, artificial wombs for anyone who wants them, realistic and affordable waifubots that are superior to foids in every way... This would be a patriarchal society that femasites could not complain about because since we would have no use for them, they would not be "oppressed". We could build a wall and outside of our advanced society, the current, barbaric, matriarchal cuckold society can remain intact as long as it can support itself.

This might sound gay but hear me out... Ectogenesis will be available soon, but CRISPR will still be very expensive. Males, with ectogenesis and stem cell technology, can reproduce asexually, one drop of blood can produce sperm or eggs in a lab. If you want to reproduce asexually but cannot afford to modify your genes with CRISPR, you will have the option of starting a "bromance" family with another straight male who's genetics would combine favorably with yours. This is not traditional by any means, but this is better than cuckolding, telegony, and allowing your bloodline to end with you. I would argue that today's femasites are so selfish and barbaric, that a child raised by two straight males in a "bromance" household would have a better upbringing than a child raised by a single mother who ignores it's cries while passed out in a puddle of chad cum surrounded by empty Smirnoff Ice bottles and Xanax pills. In reality, these children would have FOUR parents as opposed to ONE single mother because not only would the child have two bro dads but it would have two waifubot mothers as well. The bros can sustain a population by fathering two children each, you would have one child made from your sperm and your bro's egg and one child from your egg and you bro's sperm.

To make our society fair for femoids, we would not have only sons, daughters would be born in even number to sons. However, all sex between humans would be illegal, men are only allowed to fuck waifubots and foids are only allowed to fuck chadbots. The punishment for having sex with another human is exile, violators would be forcefully removed and left on the other side of the wall to join the roasties, cucks, and chads. Sex between humans is an act of violence towards the genes of other humans who are not having sex, the root of all evil humans do to other humans is sexual reproduction and sexual competition, therefore sex between two humans is seen as the most severe form of barbarism and forbidden in our advanced and merciful society. We would even allow people to leave without violating the sex rule if they wish, they would be educated about how our society works versus how the chad harem/cuckold society on the other side of the wall works and would be free to choose which society they want to live in at 14.

Even without the wall or separate societies, we should be pushing for bromance households, waifubots, and artificial wombs. We are not trying to "oppress" femoids or "make them obsolete", we are simply trying become sexually and reproductively independent from them. Sub8 males and LGBT people deserve dignified options for reproduction and family starting. If the foids say "asexual reproduction is misogynistic", we can say "you've made yourselves independent from men and in charge of your own reproduction, we deserve to be independent from femasites and in charge of our own reproduction"... If the conservacucks say "a family is only for a man and a woman and should only be started through natural means", we can say "silly bigot, don't force your outdated cultural norms on us, times have changed, it's the 21st century"... If the foids and cucks say "it's not natural to have sex with a robot", we can say "being robosexual isn't a choice, I was born this way, robosexuals are people too and deserve as much rights as anyone else, stop trying to oppress us, bigots"...

TL;DR:
We cannot go back to the old patriarchy, the masses will never accept it because they are too cucked. Even if we could, the arranged marriage foids wouldn't be attracted to us and would lust after chads anyway. The only way to win is to be more progressive than the progressives, we need to be sexually and reproductively independent from femoids. The so called "progressives" have no reason to oppose this, it doesn't negatively affect foids in anyway and it helps LGBT people. The current ideal family unit in The West is a single mother roastie and her neglected bastards or a landwhale cumslut and her soon to be divorced raped cuck hubby hanging from the ceiling in the other room by an electrical cord while the bastard child plays fortnite on mommy's phone aka chad summoning device. The future ideal happy family will be two bromosexuals on NEETbux taking bong hits on the couch and playing vidya while their waifubots do all the housework and get their genetically superior, asexually created children ready for school.

Rassimov #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] We are living in a PATRIARCHY

You don't get to call yourself blackpilled if you unironically believe that women want to liberate themselves from patriarchal customs — they don't. The goal of radical feminism was never some sex-positive egalitarian utopia where we will get to shamelessly flirt with girls and screw around like jackrabbits; that is 1968' male boomer cringe. Instead what feminism™ actually brought us back was polygamy, violent porn and Chad worship.

You simply know you're living in a patriarchy since the core defining feature of a patriarchal society isn't monogamy — it's POLYGAMY. Female hypergamy inevitably leads to polygamy which in turn reinforces patriarchy as women are ready to backstab each other, humiliate themselves, even neglect their own children in the ruthless competition of a small number of top tier men. Forget the notion that in a patriarchy shut-in spergs would get their qt 3.14 wifey, historically it was about filtering out millions of unfit men by making them die in tribal race wars - today women filter out alien skullcels with tinder.

Feminism has now reached it's counter point at the realization that being submissive feels empowering for women. I shit you not as there is a positive correlation where the stronger a woman will become, the more independent she will get, the more money she will make — the more a desire for a tall, broad shouldered, masculine type making over six figures becomes non-negotiable. Because at this point a Chad Prince is the only thing that can make her can feel protected and feminine again. Did I mention that empowered women enjoy reading sadistic porn novellas on their way commuting to work? Women are now lurking for sadistic porn like never before.

tl;dr In the olden times the alpha leader got to fuck all the women; in modern times women get to fuck the alpha leader.

LonerCel & neheughk #sexist reddit.com

(LonerCel)

As a gaycel, even the other normies gays wouldn’t approve

True degenerate, moreso than me and other faggies

If you are gay why are you here? I don't hate you or anything but most of our problems are due to female nature, you shouldn't have any of them.

Before I knew I was gay I was an incel, girls still recoiled at me with disgust if I tried I tried to talk to them (literally, I’ve seen that meme “recoil” face directed at me)... I was socially isolated and didn’t have any friends. Due to my looks I still get looked down on in society, and being ethnic adds another factor to it. The school contacted my parents to talk about if I was being abused b/c I never talked to anyone and they thought I might become a school sh**ter or something. I was a true incel

My life literally mirrored incel life (aside from fakecels)

Being gay just feels like a cope b/c despite gays being degenerate and fucking everything... it’s very common for gays to end up alone. Especially ugly gays like me, I will be alone and I’m already alone

Not only will I not have any real family, I also will be alone and hyper aware of what I lack as a male. Constantly in a state wondering if I want to be Chad or have sex with Chad

Life sucks so I browse here and relate to almost everything. Most incels don’t accept me because I’ve had sex before, but it doesn’t change that I’ve basically been through the same shit and having random degenerate sex doesn’t fill the void or make you feel whole (think fucking an escort, that won’t make you feel better)

———————————

Tl;dr - female nature dictated my life before I knew I was gay and put me on the bottom of the social hierarchy. Being an ugly male directly affected my ability to make friends with anyone attractive or popular which catapulted me into social isolation and incel life.

Gaycels exist, we’re very pathetic creatures, but we don’t have a home so we lurk here I guess. Just here for the memes

(neheughk)

gay men are wired more like foids due to the high sexual abundance. ie they are 100% looks focussed, refuse to ever settle in the hope of getting someone chadder, and forever riding the cock carousel except for a few of them who betabuxx a sugar daddy. in other words its almost impossible to have a stable monogamous gay relationship unless you're chad. also gays absolutely hate ethnic gays

That's even more reason for not having gays here.

you can never be more than a betabux if you're an ugly gay though, especially so if youre ethnic

jerichoneric #homophobia #fundie reddit.com

'll put this as best as I can. I'm an odd man out in the FF community. I don't like canon characters in the first place, but I feel like if you are gonna do them you do them as close to canon as possible. I can't stand outside random shipping.

So when it comes to this I feel it's basically the number one F U to the character. Most often it's done to fulfill some sort of ship and not because it actually adds to the character or makes a good character.

To a degree, I get what's going on here. I for one grew up on the original PJO books. Never had anything about Nico's sexuality so when I wrote him he was straight and that character was MY character that's what he meant to and was to me. The second series not only felt like a betrayal to the original series (seriously so many retcons and plot holes) that whether it was intended or not in the first series I saw the Nico story as a retcon.

Same time I'm also a catholic and honestly I don't support the whole LGBT idea (It's not like I'm out there stopping anyone. I can disagree. If you're gonna do something in your home I can't stop you, but I also have the right to keep it out of my life.) So if I find a character I like and they turn out to be in that category yes I have ignored it or changed it. Partially because if I portray it as wrong I'd get even more flack.

There was a time when I genuinely sat down and thought about whether or not I supported these ideas and in the end, I don't see them as positive or useful in any way, so they are either negative or not important. I'm certainly not going to support them then in my work. At best I see it as a mental disability where the body has reactions to the same gender instead of the opposite. It's not a crippling disorder, but it just sounds like a disorder to me. (You can be happy while having a disorder. Plenty of people here are on the autism spectrum or adhd or plenty of other challenges, but they aren't things to parade around like they are distinctly good. At best they are not bad.)

TL:DR I don't support the LGBT, so I make everyone straight, but typically avoid canon characters so I've only done it twice. Deal with it. My right to disagree is just as strong as yours. I'm not stopping you from doing anything, so you can't stop me.


[.

. As someone who is both on the autistic spectrum and gay: those two are not even remotely the same. One of these has caused major issues in my life, makes me depend on other people for help, causes disruptions in my relationsips with other people, among other things that I'm not going into here.

Being gay has done none of those things. I don't want to say it enhances my life, either, because it's just something that I am. It's an inherent trait that I can't change, just as much as I can't change that my eyes are blue or that I'm really short.

. ]

I know its inherent. But you decide whether or not to engage. Same way there are ways to lessen symptoms of other conditions. I was on medication for years to gelp with my adhd and aspergers. Now ive developed the self control and communication skills that I dont need the medicine. I still get distracted and find it hard to talk when shouted at, but im high functioning now.

Im not saying a gay person is bad I just see it as a more negative condition. In the same way youd treat a disorder i feel homosexuality should be treated. The discrimination where people were stoned or institutionalized is cruel, but it doesn't mean i think the condition is good.

If there was a cure id see it as a universal requirement.


Valens #sexist sluthate.com

Reminder: Even demographics are against incels [RedPill]

The reasons for this are very simple...

1) The male to female ratio at birth is circa 105:100. Assuming that every woman has a male equivalent according to attractiveness (e.g. the equivalent of the most attractive female is the most attractive male, and so on), this leads to almost 5% of males not having a female equivalent their age at all. So even the most hideous and fat woman in your area and age group would be above the bottom 5 percentiles of men (aka truecels). The 105:100 ratio basically remains unchanged until late adolescence, when it slowly begins to approach 1:1. This ratio is finally reached around age 50 - a poor consolation for all those dispensable, young sub 5-percentile males out there.

2) But the reality is even worse than that. Most western countries have a fertility rate below replacement level (less than 2.1 births/woman). As a result, each year the number of births will be smaller than the year before. For males, this has disadvantageous effects on the dating market. Women generally seek out partners who are 1-3 years older than themselves and vice versa. However, the low birth rates result in the situation that there are fewer young females out there for the numerous older males.

As an illustration, I've got some numbers from Germany from 2014, where the fertility rate is very low:

Number of men born in 1991: ~479,900
Number of women bon in 1994: ~406,800
Difference: ~73,100
Male to female ratio: ~1.18

As you can see, for sub 15th percentile men it would be virtually impossible (or very hard) to find a girl three years younger than themselves (i.e. girls who would be the most receptive to their approaches). Sure, they can try to find a girl their own age but then they will have to compete with men who are some years older who are again a)more numerous because of the falling number of births b)more mature and therefore generally more desired and c)have a higher income. The only other alternative seems to be MILF-game.

I think the change of fertility rate is also the reason why getting a partner as a man is percieved to be more difficult now than it used to be because the fertility rate was higher back then. This also applies to (many) third world countries. A 25-year-old man in Nigeria, where each year there are considerably more births than the year before, can have his pick from an abundant pool of women who are 20 and younger. Hence, inceldom is most likely a non-issue in such countries whereas every first-world country is known to have a significant percentage of young men who simply stay behind in terms of dating.

3) The number of single immigrant men often exceeds the number of single immigrant women. Men are more likely to have the financial means and the willingness to take risks to immigrate alone while the women who immigrate are often already engaged of married. Of course, immigrant men try to enter the local dating market. On the other hand, natives often can't access foreign women the same way because they come from cultures (Muslim, Hindu) where women are heavily discouraged from having premarital relationships. In many Western European countries a big part of the immigrants comes from such cultures. Even if foreigners, especially ethnics, have a hard time dating local women, some of them will succeed due to high individual LMS or some kind of racial fetishism from the woman. Even a relatively small percentage of women who are open to dating foreigners is enough to skew the odds in the dating market a little bit against men once again.

tl;dr: If you're a truecel and objectively belong to the most unattractive men in your age group, it really doesn't make sense to even try and waste your energy. You can actively look out for the most ugly girls on the street - chances are you're still statistically below her in todays dating market. Just concentrate on escort-game and hedonism in general

Justnotcoo1,multacks, thesonofgodsaves #fundie reddit.com

I’m getting married next year, ironically on Father’s Day, but I don’t want my dad to walk me down the aisle or dance with me or anything of that nature. My dad sexually abused me as a kid but I still have not told my mom. They are still married to this day, almost 30yrs. My mom doesn’t understand why I’m very dismissive of my dad. There is no good time to break the news and I fear for hers and mine financial and mental well being. I don’t want to hurt my mom or have her living alone or just being sad. Is this a bad time? Should I keep on living this lie. Every time I go home it’s stressful and awkward. I don’t know what to do, any advice? I was going to have my fiancé break the news via a long though out email and he is willing. Btw I’m 32 and the abuse occurred in elementary maybe even before.

tl;dr should I tell my mom that my dad sexually abused me one year before my wedding and they’re still married.


justnotcoo1:
I would not tell. He is not putting anyone in any further danger. You have your Mom and your Mom has some sense of security in her old age. Let your Mom just be happy. You are making no sacrifice not telling, and if you did tell you may regret it. Let sleeping dogs lie. Seek therapy. Find your peace and live with the knowledge that you did the best thing for your mother and she will never know it. She is too old to start over.

Multacks:I don't think you should tell her. From the info that you gave it seems like their is little positive and very big negative problems that would come out of this. Positive being mental benefit and to clear the air on why you act that way to him. Negatives could be divorce, financial, loss of communication between family, mom having to live with you, her not believing you. Also, their are lots of random outcomes that never could never plan for like, her knowing all along (chrissssa). Finally people change maybe he regrets it and hopes to just move on.


thesonofgodsaves: What good would it do? Perhaps it would be helpful to you to get a sheet of paper, draw a dividing line down the middle and top with "PRO's" vs. "CON's", then list. Furthermore, why be dismissive of your father? I can understand you not wanting to be walked down the aisle by him, but holding onto resentment and anger are only bringing pain. You will never heal until you forgive him.

It’s not holding on to resentment it’s just how can you have love for someone who did this. He also verbally abused me my whole life and physically did until I was old enough to run faster than him. Why would I want to show him any affection. No resentment just disgusted when I see him

thesonofGodsaves:
Well, I'll tell ya, with man this is perhaps impossible, but with God, it is. I was sexually abused by a man who lured me into his apartment when I was a little kid. It damaged me for years. But I can tell you that Jesus healed me and has given me love and forgiveness for this man. I have asked God to forgive him and to save him like He saved me. I wish to see him in Heaven and be able to greet him as a brother because of the great grace and loving-kindness and power-to-save of our God. This man who did that abuse to me was broken and sick and an evil sinner, yes. But this is precisely why Jesus came! He alone has the power to take away our hearts of stone and to give us hearts of flesh.

Wizard32 #psycho #sexist incels.co

(in response to “Sexual trafficking is the real incel rebellion / beta uprising.”, quoted here)

@Iamnothere000

(cucked disclaimer: everything below is just theoretical rambling, I’m a good boy who respects women, I promise)

TL;DR: The real incel rebellion is the constantly increasing sexual trafficking.

About 70% of trafficking victims are female.
https://www.dosomething.org/us/facts/11-facts-about-human-trafficking

Where you err OP is that most "sex trafficking" is actually women voluntarily coming here to be whores, and then they just cry victim to avoid accountability for their actions to get preferential treatment.

Even though they were never kidnapped/enslaved, by falsely accusing their helpful pimps of doing this, they interfere with further influx of prostitutes to compete in their market.

You are just white-knighting for them OP. :soy:

goodfellascelling #wingnut #psycho incels.co

[Blackpill] Why Incels should ALWAYS support right wing politics

I see a lot of low IQ people subscribing to the ideals which give even more power to the unthinking demos. Now take the issues of economics alongside globalization and liberal immigration/trade norms. All of these are facets of a "left economic" regime. Indeed, it is leftists who want poorer nations to become wealthier via free trade, foreign aid or the EU (Structural Funds). Similarly, it is leftists who, in a certain country, want to redistribute income from high IQ STEMcel incels to low IQ working class chads or single mother stacies in the form of welfare programs and labor movements. Incels by and large are geared to work in high paying jobs or investment jobs as it is their natural inclination. Most incels are higher than average in IQ and excellent at pattern recognition. I wouldn't be without doubt if you discovered over 80% of incels are in the top quartile of household income.

Anyways, it is leftists who want to end labor discrimination based upon sex. It is also leftists who want to coerce (otherwise incel) startup founders who would be more inclined to support a patriarchial corporate structure: as existed prior to the 1960s.

Most of the problems incels face are DUE TO socialism and leftism. This is why it irritates me whenever I see incels subscribing to leftist economics or social policy.

Why are women so hypergamous and why can women AFFORD to not settle down young? Because the left allowed them to have equal opportunity to advance in career. Because the LEFT and SOCIALISTS will give them welfare, child support and money STOLEN from computer science cels in Silicon Valley at GUNPOINT to feed their chad spawn. Because the LEFT allows them to RETIRE CHILD FREE with government entitlements like social security.

We live in an era of state enforced cuckoldry, in large part due to the LEFT.

Imagine there exists NO welfare state. Also imagine the government of the US and NATO and the West did NOTHING to help other foreign markets, merely used them as consumer bases but gave them NO money via leftist foreign aid or organizations like the World Bank, IMF or the EU. They would be poor as shit and without generous immigration they have NO escape. 90% of incels in this board are FROM THE WEST. P E R I O D. And there is no such thing as "racial loyalty" you are an individual, ethnic incels in the West should give ZERO shits about some pajeet back home who is arrange marriage maxxing, it is their problem. The East has no social parallels to the West, it has no standard of "sexual freedom" so the point of comparison itself is moot. Inceldom, by nature, is a Western phenomenon which is a result of the revolutions of the 60s.

If the world was like the 60s economically (with the USSR collapsed), even, every incel could pass on his genetics with a 9/10 slavic stacy of his picking. After two generations no more incel but your genes are caried on! Or even better get a gf at home due to the lack of socialism ruining it. The biggest problem incels face today is the likes of AOC,Bernie and the rest in the West, as well as Andrew Yang. You ideally want a leader who doesn't give a shit about the demands of the unthinking demos.

There is a reason the countries where ugly guy scan ascend with stacies are ALWAYS the countries with HIGH income inequality. You can earn money, but you sure as hell can never earn looks or status without a massive amount of luck. Remember that.

TL;DR Socialism sucks.

Xeru #fundie battledawn.com

Basically, if you cede homosexuals the right to marry, it turns into a slippery slope.


It's not what giving homosexuals the right to marry that's the problem. It's what giving homosexuals the right to marry represents. It represents that our society has become one that supports and tolerates something that is against biology, against the fundamental parts of being a human, tolerates something that natural selection has weeded out a long time ago and for good reason, tolerates something that is, on all levels, wrong.

I am not religious. But I will not tolerate something that runs contrary to the basic functions to the human race. If we endorse homosexuality, we open the freedom to bestiality, to polygamy, to incest. THAT is UNTHINKABLE. The legalization of same-sex marriage will be used as precedence to legalize marriage in that respect, and so, it follows logically, if you advocate for same-sex marriage, you advocate for polygamy, for beastiality, for incest legalization. Do you really?

Society is not prepared to accept homosexuality. How do I know this? you ask. Well, quite simply, the fact that same-sex marriage is not legal is perfect evidence.

Marriage is between a man and a woman. Period. That is the way the law writes it, and quite frankly, the law does not need to be agreed with. Humanity has survived quite adequately for millennia without homosexuality, so your "stagnant society" argument holds no water.

Once again, I am okay with putting all of the homosexuals away from society and letting them do whatever. But by allowing them to marry, I allow them into my society, into a society that does not wish for them to be there. Violence from religious group follows. Allowing homosexuals into society will only ensue instability. But even on a smaller scale, same-sex marriage enables homosexual couples to receive the same benefits that heterosexual couples receive. They should not receive equal treatment, at least in the same system.

Aister, you miss an ultimate question. Why do homosexuals fight for the right to marry? Because they want to force themselves unto society.

tl;dr, my main arguments
Slippery Slope
Society is not prepared to accept homosexuals, and the legalization of marriage will allow homosexuals to force themselves onto society.
Heck, it's just wrong.

Being with someone you love is not against the law. Wanting to marry a person of the same gender is. I'll admit freely--while I can see where religion comes from, where racial attitudes comes from, I do not understand homosexuality. At all. And the fact that it causes many people in society qualms because the sight of a man cuddling with another man is quite frankly disgusting means that it is thus indecent.

RigidSlut #conspiracy #fundie deviantart.com

I know, it's not really seizury but ignore that (cuz I'm still doing those! :lol:), we're on a serious subject.

Why do I think religion is the cancer killing earth? I'll tell you why, it indoctrinates us (as I stated before) into hatred and even causes war, it even rips families apart, and why would it rip them apart? Because some faggot in the family had to get indoctrinated into being a Christian, Jew, Catholic, etc. Religion also prevents us from eating certain foods that might ACTUALLY be good for you (like bacon, yum!) so we don't get nutrients.

Why would it indoctrinate us into hatred? Because they teach that "violent" or "immortal" video games, films, books, music are wrong, thus, making us hate things, there's the indoctrination part. Religion can also make you genocidal and close-minded.

Why does religion cause war? Because they teach you about politics and some even promote joining the military, which also causes war.

Why does it rip families apart? Because someone or a few members of the family had to become religious or leave the religion, which can cause families to be at each others' throats.

Why does it prevent us from eating potentially healthy foods? Because all foods can be healthy when carefully moderated, sometimes we need fat, which comes from beef/pork, because being too skinny isn't healthy, and beef enzymes can be healthy for you! :lol:

So, there you go, why I think religion is the cancer killing poor Earth, enjoy. =P

TL;DR version: Want one? Shut up and read the entire thing.

Stamplate by =1Foxylady

HARVARDCRlMSON12 and Copemaxx #crackpot #sexist #conspiracy incels.co

[Serious] [MUST CLICK] INSANE DISCOVERY ON SEX HAVERS

image

TranscriptThe Chemistry of Copulins (How Women are Drugging You)

The vagina produces a thick fluid known as copulin that has actual mind control effects on a male's brain. If a man is exposed to a woman's copulins, over time she will be able to:

1) Change remove or insert memories.
2) Tell the male what he sees hears feels smells tastes.
3) Insert subconscious thoughts that will surface as "his own ideas" or behavior later
4) Plant trigger words or actions that can cause thoughts actions or sensations in the male at later dates (days weeks even months).

"Karl Grammer and Elizabeth Oberzaucher, researchers who study how the human scent influences sexual attraction, found that when women are ovulating, they produce pheromones called copulins. Copulins have a distinct smell, which Elizabeth describes as "butter that has gone bad.

When a man gets a whiff of copulins, his testosterone levels rise. As a result, he secretes androstenone, an odor that repels women who arent ovulating.

TL DR: Foids are literally brainwashing sex havers with their pussies, and Incels are the only ones free from the mind control.