Similar posts

Janet bloomfield #sexist judgybitch.com

Brock Turner is a rapist but not the kind that frightens me.

A guy I train with told me a funny story about mixing martial arts with alcohol. Like me, he’s not really interested in martial arts as a sport, but more in terms of real world applicability. He’s a fighter more than an athlete. He was training with a group who felt the most likely environment in which they would encounter real violence would be a bar, and alcohol would likely be involved, so they convinced their sensei to run a simulation that involved everyone doing tequila shooters, to test their reflexes and muscle memories under the influence. Could they drink tequila and still be able to handle real world violence? They turned the lights down and the music way up, which is not that unusual for a dojo. Lots of stress drills are done in low light, noisy conditions.

And then guzzled tequila.

Everything started out fine. Everyone was jokey and boisterous and having fun with the drills and even singing along to the hokey death metal band. And then tequila 2.0 arrived. When the full effects kicked in, people started getting hurt. The fight took on a whole new dimension. Wrist locks got brutal. People didn’t notice their partners tapping out. Choke holds were a little too enthusiastic. No one waited for a secure hold before reaping. It was mayhem!

It’s funny to hear him tell the story, because from the outside it seems like a terrifying drunken brawl, and it was, but the fighters enjoyed every minute of it. It was fun. Sensei had to cut the class short because people were getting hurt. Being drunk, they didn’t really realize it, and were thoroughly enjoying themselves. The next day, people had bruises and sprains and fat lips and black eyes and swollen joints and stuff that should never happen except by pure accident when sparring. Someone even dropped a 12-6 elbow between his opponent’s shoulder blades, which is pretty much a nuclear elbow strike you don’t pull out lightly. It’s actually sort-of illegal in most martial arts, but perfectly acceptable in self-defense. The fighters agreed to never drunk spar again, although I suspect that was a very effective lesson in teaching them just how much alcohol impaired their ability to use proportional violence.

The real point is that while the sparring was happening, the fighters were having a blast. They were doing what they do: fighting. I’m sure getting out of bed the next day brought a few regrets home, but in the moment, it was fun. The whole story made me think of the Brock Turner case – the Stanford athlete convicted of sexually assaulting a drunk woman outside a fraternity.

Let’s get a few things out of the way right off the bat: do I think Brock Turner is a rapist?

Yes.

Yes, I do. Turner claims he went outside with the woman and they were making out and I believe him. They were both drunk, but she was sloppy drunk and she passed out cold. Turner dragged her behind a dumpster, removed her panties, somehow managed to get rocks and dirt in her vagina, shoved his fingers in her, left her with scrapes and bruises and only stopped assaulting her when a couple guys noticed what he was up to, and then chased Turner down when he ran. Bystanders held Turner until police arrived.

Please note that this is exact opposite of feminist rape culture, in which rape is treated like a joke and condoned by the wider society. No one (except Turner’s father) thinks Turner’s action were amusing or acceptable. The Stanford police were involved right off the bat, the woman was found and taken to hospital, charges were laid and Turner was prosecuted successfully and sentenced to jail, even though the victim can’t remember a single thing about the incident. That doesn’t sound like condoning, celebrating or accepting rape to me. Or to Ashe Schow, who has written a nice explanation of rape culture as it relates to Brock Turner.

But of course, feminists are mad. They’re always mad. They’re mad at Brock because being sentenced to life isn’t harsh enough. Yes, you read that correctly. Turner got a life sentence. No, not in jail. He was sentenced to 6 months in jail, and will likely spend 3 months there, but he will spend the rest of his life on the Sex Offender Registry. That is punishment untempered by mercy, yet not punishment enough to satisfy feminists, ecstatic that they finally found an actual rape victim to get behind.

According to Emily Horowitz, who wrote [i]Protecting Our Kids: How Sex Offender Laws Are Failing Us[/i], sex offender registries don’t keep anyone safer. Speaking to Slate’s Christina Cauterucchi, Horowitz says. ‘Are sex offenders destined to reoffend? Not according to any research—sex offenders have lower recidivism rates than almost any other type of offender. Punishing [Turner] forever and destroying his life doesn’t make anyone safer.’

I’m sure you’ll be shocked to know that feminists don’t care. Read the comments. They want Turner to suffer for the rest of his life. They want him to pay for his idiocy for the rest of his life. They want revenge, not justice. It’s so rare for an actual, unambiguous rape victim to emerge, feminists are practically in shock. Whipping women up in frenzied fear, feminists have convinced almost 100K people to sign a petition to remove the judge who decided to temper Turner’s life sentence with reduced jail time. Justice must not have mercy? I’d be really careful with that demand, feminists. It could bite you in the ass, pretty easily.

The reality here is that Brock Turner is like the fighters who beat the shit out of each other while loaded. Turner has no reputation for being criminally sexually aggressive, but he is a predator. Like all athletes, he channels his natural desire to compete and triumph into a sport, and he was very good at winning. Competitors and predators come down to the same thing. No one wants to tie. It’s a zero sum game. I win. You lose. Civilization is the story of channeling this aspect of human nature into creation, rather than destruction. Brock Turner got drunk and behaved in a criminally foolish manner. An equivalent would be a drunk sparring partner who knocked his partner out and then kept hitting him. It crosses every line and deserves sanction and punishment.

Rapists like Turner don’t frighten me. Avoiding him is as simple as not getting black out drunk and refusing to go make out with him outside, in the dark. The trouble with feminist definitions of rape is that they confuse drunk couples who go outside and have mutually consensual sex, having fun in the moment, with actual rape. That is exactly what happened at Occidental College. Both individuals were drunk, both agreed to have sex, but she regretted it the next morning. If they had both been drunk, and agreed to spar, could she charge him with assault and battery the next day? Occidental says yes.

I say no.

People do stupid shit when they’re drunk. Alcohol lowers inhibitions, which is a key reason people like to drink it. But it doesn’t fundamentally change who you are as a person. The fighters my friend and I talked about did stupid stuff when fighting drunk they would never do sober, but none of them crossed the line into brutally beating an unconscious partner. It was just a kind of crazy, wild playfight that left a few people bruised and bleeding, but no criminal lines were crossed.

Most drunk sex, no matter how much one party or the other might regret it in the morning, is not rape.

What Turner did is rape.

Feminist definitions of regret=rape are now starting to trap women, too. When Rose grabbed herself a drunk guy and fucked him, she thought it was just a good time, had by all. And it was. In the moment. But when morning came and the guy saw he had just boned a fat chick, he turned campus rape laws on her and had Rose expelled.

This is nuts.

And awesome, at the same time. Turnabout is fair play, ladies. If you are going to expand the definition of rape to include sex one person regrets, you’re going to have to accept the uncomfortable truth that men make poor decisions when plastered, too, and stick their dicks in women they wouldn’t glance at twice when sober. If we’re going to call drunk sparring ‘assault’ and criminally prosecute it, any woman who downs a shooter and steps in the ring can be charged.

Is this really the world we want? Young men and women expelled from college, their futures blighted, because they got drunk and did something dumb? No one should be expelled from college for hooking up while drunk. Drunk sex is not rape. Rape is rape. It’s not that hard to tell the difference. Turner is a case study in campus rape. And even he doesn’t deserve a life sentence. He is extremely unlikely to reoffend.

Justice without mercy is cruelty. Is anyone surprised feminists are howling for exactly that when it comes to Turner, and by extension, all men accused of rape? The real danger here is that cruelty can be contagious. I sincerely hope the courts do not bow to the pressure of feminists and remove this judge. That will spread the contagion of feminism and we are already at critical mass.

Never forget that feminism is cancer.

What we really need are a few more fat bitches to get charged with rape. A few brave men are needed, to take one for the team. We need to show everyone the insanity of feminist ideals of ‘justice’.

Any volunteers?

Lots of love,

JB

Eivind Berge #fundie eivindberge.blogspot.com.au

The insidious power of metaphors

Thanks to the hateful campaign to demonize Brock Turner as a rapist, I think I better understand how sexual hysterias work. Firstly, it needs to be pointed out that Brock Turner is not actually a rapist, even by the legal definition in California:

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/stanford-rape-case-brock-turner-victims-statement-a7074246.html

He is guilty of digital penetration, and not even a violent one at that; just taking advantage of the woman's intoxicated state. So why are people so absurdly hysterical about this minor sexual assault? Why do they demand to punish it as if it were rape? I disagree that it should be criminal at all, since the woman got drunk willingly and went along with it, but even if you agree with the law, it was far removed from rape.

I think people react to the metaphor rather than reality. Feminist propaganda has been so successful that "sexual assault" is now synonymous with "rape" in the mind of the mob, and so rape is all they can see in their imagination. It was recently shown that the meaning of words are stored in the same place in the brain across individuals:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v532/n7600/abs/nature17637.html

Feminists have managed to hijack the semantic mapping of "rape" and meld it with "sexual assault," so now all it takes to create mass hysteria is to accuse sexual assault. This is also how statutory rape works, and how feminists have even managed the absurd feat of creating the concept of female rapists and female sex offenders. These are all about metaphors, and metaphors are all you need to create lynch mobs and criminal convictions alike, after legal reforms which are also based on metaphors rather than reality.

Because the meanings of words have so extreme consequences when they are enshrined in criminal law, and even when they aren't, it is important not to let the metaphors get out of hand. One thing we need to make absolutely clear is that rape can only be performed with a penis. A real penis. Brock Turner didn't use his penis -- just his fingers -- and women by definition don't have penises so they can't be rapists. If you don't see this, then you are in thrall of metaphors rather than reality and need to break the spell. And we need to turn back the feminist legal reforms which have already so unreasonably expanded the definition of rape in many jurisdiction.

Caamib #sexist voat.co

The word rape has various meanings today. Some, like the one which will be about its sane legal definition, are sadly mostly historical in current Western culture, though they still subsist in some saner cultures even today. So what are these definitions?

Sane definition of the act of rape - This definition is also consistent with Common Law ("Carnal knowledge of a woman forcibly and against her will") and even with evolutionary psychology (“Human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless such resistance would probably result in death or serious injury to her or others she commonly protects” is the definition used by Thornhill & Palmer in A Natural History of Rape).

So rape can only be performed by a penis and of course women can't rape men.

Sane legal definition of rape - Sane legal systems differentiate between act of rape and a crime of rape. A sane legal definition of rape doesn't believe all acts of rape are crimes of rape. What nonsense would it be to believe that and to treat the whims of some sluts as actually defacing a virgin or a married woman !

A sane legal definition of rape would define rape as a property crime against the woman's father or husband. Also, rapes against prostitutes should be prosecuted. But it would certainly never account for rapes of sluts, and would consider raping a slut a justified response that should be praised, not persecuted.

Current insane definition of the act/crime of rape - I am saying act/crime of rape because insane modern Western cultures basically don't differentiate between the act of rape and a crime of rape. In any case, this definition had been, especially since 2000, expanded to include much more than just the actual act of rape. It now includes any form of coercion, inserting objects into sexual orifices, even the insane claim that a woman can rape a male ! There are feminists/liberals insane enough to believe Brock Turner raped some unconscious woman he fingered or that I raped a woman who offered my sex herself in a phone call, simply because I put her picture on my blog when she decided to torture me (as she later admitted herself).

An actual moral definition of rape used by feminists/liberals - this is what almost all feminists and liberals actually see as rape. It is defined as any act a straight white male does to get sex. Asking a woman out by a straight white male is rape to liberals. Going on a date if you're a straight white male is rape. On the other hand, no actual act of rape, even rape of smallest children, is rape if it is done by Sacred Classes like blacks, Muslims or Hispanics.

I will admit that there are some feminists and liberals who don't believe so, but these mostly stop calling themselves feminists or liberals once they realize what these ideologies are about.

It is also true that this definition isn't yet widely used in law but and police officers and judges who don't use this definition are seen as vermin by liberals and there are places in the West where it's slowly getting there .

Female definition of rape- Women simply define rape as sex they regret, and pay basically no intention to any other circumstances, including physical pain. So this definition is completely silly and shouldn't be regarded by anybody sane as anything more than what 5 year-old children think. That some legal systems are starting to bring this definition into equation (though usually by ignoring the sex with a member of Sacred classes females regret) is simply a symptom of a decaying society.

Caamib #fundie caamib.wordpress.com

The word rape has various meanings today. Some, like the one which will be about its sane legal definition, are sadly mostly historical in current Western culture, though they still subsist in some saner cultures even today. So what are these definitions?

Sane definition of the act of rape – This definition is also consistent with Common Law (“Carnal knowledge of a woman forcibly and against her will”) and even with evolutionary psychology (“Human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless such resistance would probably result in death or serious injury to her or others she commonly protects” is the definition used by Thornhill & Palmer in A Natural History of Rape).

So rape can only be performed by a penis and of course women can’t rape men.

Sane legal definition of rape – Sane legal systems differentiate between act of rape and a crime of rape. A sane legal definition of rape doesn’t believe all acts of rape are crimes of rape. What nonsense would it be to believe that and to treat the whims of some sluts as actually defacing a virgin or a married woman !

A sane legal definition of rape would define rape as a property crime against the woman’s father or husband. Also, rapes against prostitutes should be prosecuted. But it would certainly never account for rapes of sluts, and would consider raping a slut a justified response that should be praised, not persecuted.

Current insane definition of the act/crime of rape – I am saying act/crime of rape because insane modern Western cultures basically don’t differentiate between the act of rape and a crime of rape. In any case, this definition had been, especially since 2000, expanded to include much more than just the actual act of rape. It now includes any form of coercion, inserting objects into sexual orifices, even the insane claim that a woman can rape a male ! There are feminists/liberals insane enough to believe Brock Turner raped some unconscious woman he fingered or that I raped a woman who offered my sex herself in a phone call, simply because I put her picture on my blog when she decided to torture me (as she later admitted herself).

An actual moral definition of rape used by feminists/liberals – this is what almost all feminists and liberals actually see as rape. It is defined as any act a straight white male does to get sex. Asking a woman out by a straight white male is rape to liberals. Going on a date if you’re a straight white male is rape. On the other hand, no actual act of rape, even rape of smallest children, is rape if it is done by Sacred Classes like blacks, Muslims or Hispanics.

I will admit that there are some feminists and liberals who don’t believe so, but these mostly stop calling themselves feminists or liberals once they realize what these ideologies are about.

It is also true that this definition isn’t yet widely used in law but and police officers and judges who don’t use this definition are seen as vermin by liberals and there are places in the West where it’s slowly getting there .

Female definition of rape– Women simply define rape as sex they regret, and pay basically no intention to any other circumstances, including physical pain. So this definition is completely silly and shouldn’t be regarded by anybody sane as anything more than what 5 year-old children think. That some legal systems are starting to bring this definition into equation (though usually by ignoring the sex with a member of Sacred classes females regret) is simply a symptom of a decaying society.

Randironda #sexist reddit.com

on brock turner


A young intoxicated male college student making out with a young intoxicated female college student should not be accused of rape. It is going to get to the point where our sons needs to take vital signs and give females breathalyzer tests. Did she fondle his penis b4 passing out? If so, is she a rapist? Take some responsibility ladies.
One more thing, if a child is a high achiever great athelete, is white and was raised in an upper middle class family why is he being penalized and stereotyped? He's an easy target. It's no longer correct to hate on African Americans, gays, transgendered people, or women. So, bam Brock turner is it.

Miu #fundie city-data.com

(On the Brock Turner case)

Why can't I blame the victim for showing a complete lack of commonsense? Was he the first man to ever take advantage of a woman's inebriated state? There have been these situations for as long as there has been human beings consuming alcohol. Stop coddling these victims. They do need to take responsibility and not put themselves in vulnerable situations.

That young man's reputation is ruined for the rest of his life. He is now permanently on the sex offenders list. And no matter what he ends up doing for work, he will never get any endorsement deals or become top management for any company. He will be a pariah wherever he goes.

I think that you are jealous of this boy's previous status as a "golden boy". You are jealous that he was smart enough to get into Stanford and could have had the perfect life... shrug.

Had she been my daughter, I would be mad at her for going to a college party and getting so drunk. And when I was going to Brown University in the late 1970's, I knew better than to go to the keg parties at the frat houses. And I also, know that any compliments from a man at a party like that or at a night club was more an effort to get into my pants than actually wanting to get into a relationship with me and become my boyfriend or husband. I was also able to get backstage at many rock concerts in the 1980's. And since I stayed sober and drug-free at these gatherings, and no one ever tried to sexually assault me.

And back to chaperones... well the human brain isn't fully developed until the age of 25. The frontal cortex is the last to develop and that where the decision making process is. And it's why males before the age of 25 have such high auto insurance rates. Young men are prone to making bad impulsive decisions. Add to that, men are just more sexually motivated creatures than women. That's just a fact of life.

Wizard32 #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] I called myself “big mama”, because I knew I’d be the oldest one there. (even white Chadlites can't racemax with older fat roasties)

I think sometimes we are vulnerable to envying the 8+ guys that we tend to idealize their situations.

I'm not sure why... I think it's D+C tactics to keep men infighting, TBH.

Perhaps it's partially cope, because we like to pretend happiness is just beyond the curtain. That we'd only have to be a little bit better to enjoy happiness.

If we look at the situation of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller (formerly "Emily Doe") in the Stanford "rape" issue though, it paints a stark reality.

Even a popular athletic Chadlite who is generous enough to finger a girl before she puts out gets falsely accused of rape as soon as the discovery of female degeneracy risks ruining her fake reputation. Men readily assault each other at the drop of a hat, knowing they can get away with it, because only (alleged) assaults against foids get treated seriously.

Basically even if you are a chadlite, a woman who is several points below you is still not a safe investment. Being an 8 is no guarantee of happiness because a pair of 9s can just decide to beat you up while you're on top of a girl so they can become heroes.

That can do this with impunity because they know foids don't want to admit to being degenerate sluts who beg to get fingered in alleyways, so if they start beating up an inferior male (even if he's just 1 point lower) they know the foid will back them up and cry rape (and probably help by feigning unconsciousness, as Chanel did) to save her reputation and get victimcred.

Mogging isn't just 8-10 chadlite/midchad/gigachad mogging the rest of us 1s-7s, it even occurs in the chadsphere and even chadlites can't consensually give a pity fingerbang to an older/fatter/uglier/non-white female who begs for his digit to warm up her gaping hole for his superior caucasian seed, because she is always plotting on how to upgrade to a higher tier of chad, as we can see happened here with the swedish PhD student cyclists Peter Lars Jonsson and Carl-Fredrik Arndt

Daniel Payne #fundie thefederalist.com

These days it’s no easy life for perpetrators of fake hate crimes and hoaxes generally: every time somebody comes up with a really good fake scandal, the whole thing seems to unravel within a short while. Time was, a man could go through all the trouble to arrange a hoax and could expect to reap the rewards of his hard work. Not anymore.
What’s changed? Part of it is technological: there are more security cameras, more digital paper trails, more text message records. These present opportunities for hoaxes to be exposed: there are simply more chances for people to give something away, either idiosyncratically (by, say, sending an incriminating e-mail or text message) or extraneously (by being caught on a closed-circuit camera, for instance).

Perhaps more importantly, with the multiple sensational hoaxes taking place over the past decade or so (Breitbart has catalogued more than 100 of them), much of the public—at least among those of us who work in media—has become vigilant in spotting such chicanery and exposing it. Just the same, plenty of hoaxes still get widespread attention before they’re exposed; sometimes they cause lots of damage before they’re revealed as fake.
The good news is you can train yourself to be a hoax-spotter as well. You never know: you might be instrumental in exposing the next big fake hate crime or hoax. Here are three things to look for in determining whether an accusation is probably real or possibly fake.
1. The Allegations Are Too Good to Be True
What do I mean by this? Simply that you should be skeptical of claims that overly gratify certain biases or cultural narratives. The more an accusation of wrongdoing or criminal activity sounds like a picture-perfect capitalized example of Hate Crime or Wicked Evil Behavior, the more you should mistrust the claims.
Take, for example, the now-debunked Rolling Stone article “A Rape on Campus,” which detailed an alleged hours-long gang rape of one young woman by a bunch of fraternity boys. The whole story turned out to be a fabrication and a global humiliation for Rolling Stone. But in the beginning, everyone believed it. Why?

As Richard Bradley pointed out (Bradley was one of the first to publicly question the story), the tale gratified many people’s pre-existing biases: biases regarding “rape culture,” fraternities, men (especially Southern men), and feckless, hostile college bureaucracies. You could have hardly asked for a story that played into more prejudices. Coincidentally, the story turned out to be an enormous lie.
Those of us who raised suspicions were lambasted as “truthers” and rebuked as rape apologists and misogynists. Everybody could have saved themselves a lot of humiliation and anger during those crazy weeks if they had simply exercised a bit of healthy skepticism.
More recently, in the aftermath of the Orlando nightclub massacre, a fair number of people claimed to have either had sex with the shooter or else interacted with him on gay hookup apps. There’s that too-good-to-be-true narrative again: an openly anti-gay Islamic man is secretly an active homosexual. It gratifies many peoples’ prejudices: against religion, against anti-gay sentiment, against the way some cultures repress and lambast homosexuality and homosexual desires.
The problem: the allegations are totally unsubstantiated. The FBI has turned up zero evidence. Nobody can find any record of the shooter on any gay dating apps. Somebody produced what appeared to be a profile on one of the apps, but it turned out to be fake. The administrator of one of the apps openly stated he believed it was a hoax. One witness, when pressed to provide more evidence, “became combative,” according to the New York Times: “I don’t need to prove anything to anyone,” he said. “If I said it, it’s true.” Does that sound like a credible witness?

Be skeptical. It doesn’t mean you have to callously or conclusively doubt the people who are making these claims—you should not assume a priori that every victim or witness is a liar. You should, however, be appropriately incredulous when it comes to these things. Fantastical claims should trigger a red flag immediately.
2. The Evidence Doesn’t Add Up
You’re (probably) not a detective or even a journalist, and thus it’s not your job to gather forensic evidence at a crime scene or interview witnesses of murders or assaults. But that doesn’t mean you can’t still make a reasonable judgment regarding available evidence.
Take, for example, the University of Virginia rape hoax mentioned above. The victim claimed to have been raped for three hours on top of broken glass on a fraternity bedroom floor. But she also claimed she refused to go to the hospital for medical treatment. If you’ve been to any frat house across the country, you’ll know they usually aren’t the cleanest or most sanitary places on the planet (I’ve been to several at UVA, and most were uniformly gross). If the rape victim had declined to seek medical treatment after such an episode, the cuts on her back could easily have become infected and she probably would have fallen gravely ill and required hospitalization. That was just one small example of how her story did not add up.
More recently, gay YouTube personality Calum McSwiggan claimed that three homophobic men assaulted him outside of a gay bar in Los Angeles. By his own admission the men punched him hard enough on his mouth to break three of his teeth. The problem? Police later arrested McSwiggan for vandalizing a car, and his mug shot shows absolutely no visible damage to his mouth. Punching someone in the mouth hard enough to snap three teeth in half would leave a lot of bruising and swelling, if not graphically split lips.

More damningly, the Advocate interviewed McSwiggan a few days later, and McSwiggan showed off the bruises, cuts, and other injuries he claims he sustained from the incident—except for his allegedly broken teeth. It’s possible McSwiggan is telling the truth about the assault. But the available evidence strongly implies otherwise. It’s more likely the assault was mostly or entirely fabricated and will be revealed as such in the coming weeks.
So it is with many hoaxes: a quick review of the evidence will often turn up inconsistencies and incoherencies that suggest something isn’t right. Sometimes there are good explanations for these things. Sometimes the explanation is that it’s a hoax.
3. There Is A Big, Public Payoff for the Victim
Our culture has come to prize victimhood: it is often a lucrative trade. Students who claim to feel “unsafe” on college campuses are pampered and feted; liberal college mobs in recent years have even toppled university administrations and forced high-level officials to resign. Being a victim carries a great deal of prestige among large parts of twenty-first-century America.

With this in mind, it is unsurprising many people perpetrate hate hoaxes: they do it for the low kind of fame and fortune that often comes with being a victim. A few years ago a gay waitress fabricated an anti-gay incident for that very reason. A gay pastor in Austin, Texas did the same thing. A black activist at Kean University tweeted fake racist threats at her fellow black students to gin up controversy and build support for her activism.
Sometimes the payoff is less obvious but still very real: earlier this year three black women claimed they were assaulted on a public bus by white men who also hurled racial slurs at them. It turned out to be false: the young women had started a fight on the bus and wanted to deflect attention away from their own bad behavior. In the meantime the women received tons of support and the campus turned into a hotbed of racial activism. Payoff!
Whenever you read of a terrible or sensational claim of violence or bigotry, it is always worthwhile to ask: what is the potential payoff for the people making these claims? This doesn’t mean you should assume every victim of every crime is trying to scam you. But for the kinds of headline-grabbing events that often drive our news cycles, this kind of curious skepticism is always advisable.

If you follow these three rules, there is a better-than-average chance you’ll spot hoaxes instead of being sucked in by them. You may even do better than our credulous media and pundit class, both of which are often very eager to report on these hoaxes without doing even basic investigatory work. You will save yourself a lot of embarrassment on social media if you’re not taken in, and you won’t contribute to any mass hysteria or public pitchfork mobs in the meantime.
There is, of course, a danger in being too skeptical: in doubting 100 percent any kind of wild or fantastical claim a victim or witness makes. You shouldn’t close your mind to the possibility that these claims are true. All of the hoaxes listed here were 100 percent possible. The problem was, they weren’t very plausible—and in the end they ended up being total fakes, promoted and spread by people who were too eager to question much.
Do not be scared to be skeptical. It may make you unpopular with a certain class of people who eagerly want to believe everything that gratifies their biases. You might get yelled at or scolded if you are too prudent or cautious in getting on board with a public outrage. But you’ll be doing the right thing: making an informed judgment based on the facts instead of blind, biased rage. That’s always worthwhile.
Daniel Payne is an assistant editor for The College Fix, the news magazine of the Student Free Press Association. Daniel's work has appeared in outlets such as National Review Online, Reason, Front Porch Republic, and elsewhere. His personal blog can be found at Trial of the Century. He lives in Virginia.

Bruce #conspiracy illuminatiwatchdog.blogspot.ca

Getting into the Illuminati was probably the dumbest and most difficult thing I have ever done. I was recruited when I was a student at (name censored) University by Professor (name censored). It sounded exciting at first and we didn't know that we were being drafted into a real secret order. There were a few social gatherings which led to a few trips. At first it seemed like a great networking opportunity. There were reps from all over the corporate world. Goldman Sachs, Chase, Bank of America, Apple, IBM, Google, even Lehman Brothers was in on it at the time. The list of names could go on endlessly. I remember meeting Dick Fuld at one of these events. I don't know what happened at Lehman but somehow they were chosen to be the sacrificial lamb for whatever phase that got started in 2008.

So after a few months of doing brief internships and other odd jobs for the order, I was asked to take an oath of loyalty. They made it seem like it was just for fun, almost sophmorish in some aspects. I felt like it was a frat rush. We went to an old house near campus and a couple of the guys donned black robes. We were brought forth stark naked before them and forced to kneel. They then produced a book with the Eye of Providence on the cover and we had to place our hands on it while kissing the rings of the guys in the black robes. We were then anointed with some kind of water or other liquid before having black robes placed upon us. We were then part of the order.

I honestly thought that the whole thing would end after college and we would go our separate ways like all frat guys do after graduation. That wasn't the case. In fact, we actually became more deeply involved. The guys in the black robes turned out to be people with amazing connections. A couple of the guys I was inducted with ended up at the White House during the Bush years, another got a cushy embassy posting in France, and I got a six figure job at (name censored). Pretty much everyone got something super lucrative.

Once I was working, things went pretty normally. I bought a house, went to shows and sporting events, and hung out with friends. A normal life for the most part. Once a year, those of us in our "cell" as I'll call it got together and performed a ceremony from the order. During the first one, I just thought it was old friends having a good time until my elder told me to expect a call from (name censored) and that I was going to get an account to oversee. I was to ask no questions and take all of my orders regarding the management of that account from the elder. The next day the call came and my elder met me for lunch and gave me my instructions. I told him this was all nuts before we compared stats on our fantasy football teams. He said not to worry and that it was all prearranged. Over the next few months I saw that account blossom from a couple of a hundred thousand dollars to the tens of millions. That was when I realized that I was not part of some college secret society but something much bigger.

My elder and I got on great until the winter of 2013. He told me that I was ready to go to the next tier, that those of us who had come in together were all ready and that "fresh blood" would takeover our roles. At first I was psyched. The promises made were so lavish and incredible. One of the guys in my cohort was going to be elected to Congress while the other was going to be appointed CEO of a new startup that will become a Fortune 500 after 6 years. I also got something pretty good, an appointment as a senior executive with (name censored). We just had to go through another ceremony to be inducted to the next tier.

Knowing that this was for real and not some joke frat group, I was terrified especially because of the occult traits of the ceremonies. This one was scary as hell and strangely the most exhilarating. We were brought to a mansion. My elder took us blindfolded. No technology could come either. Once there we were sent to a room and instructed to take off our clothes and place masks over our faces. Then we were led to a massive hall and there were at least a hundred other naked people. For the next 6 hours we engaged in orgiastic sex. I can't describe how it all felt. At first it was really strange. I had never had sex with a man before but after having sex with several men and then several women that night I began to feel more and more homosexual. When I had sex with my elder, it was a powerfully emotional experience. The last act involved me and the other guys in my cell having our own orgy with the elder. That was the most exhilarating encounter and ever since that night I have identified as a homosexual.

I left the order three weeks later. I think my experience during that induction ceremony did something to me. I don't want to be gay yet I can't seem to go back to being straight. I've tried to date some women since then, even had sex with a few of them. It doesn't help me overcome the feelings. My elder wouldn't accept my resignation. He pretty much said that there is no leaving but he understood that I needed a break. If he finds out about my tell all, I'll be truly saddened. Before that night, he was a friend but now I think I'm in love with him. I don't want to go back yet I do and I probably will. But until then I want to tell people that I was Illuminati, they're real and they control everything."

Special thanks to our sources in the Boston metropolitan area for providing us with this account.

Edmund_Kemper #sexist #transphobia incels.co

[RageFuel] Bluepilled fags try to argue against me on fstdt

This bluepilled faggot named Swede reads that I said most people like him only agree with what everyone else believes and how if he lives in a society where society had different values his values would be different

then he says “i aCcEpT hOmOs aNd TrAnNiEs BeCaUsE iT’S rIgHt” no you don’t. And then he says in the 50s people were still pretty live and let live yeah go back to that era and kiss another man in public or kiss a black person and you’d get beaten up or yelled at. If he seriously thinks he would’ve accept homos back then he’s wrong. He would’ve hated them back then. And only 4% of Americans approved to interracial marriage back then. This retard cuck thinks he’d be part of that 4%. He thinks he’d resist Kim jong un if he lived in North Korea or would’ve resisted Hitler if he lived in nazi Germany when only a tiny percent of Germans did that. Then he says marrying jb foids wasn’t common back in Ancient Greece because pederasty happened back then. Just because teen boys fucked adult men back then doesn’t mean adult men didn’t marry jb foids. Several sources say girls usually married in their mid-teens to a man twice their age and then he says they were prolly bad wives back then because they were young teens even though teens grew up faster back then. And the teen brain thing is a myth (look it up)

keep an eye on this bluepilled website
Edmund_Kemper #wingnut
here’s the link

I hate the openness of the 21st century.
We allow too much degeneracy.

If he lived in the 50s he would’ve hated homos

Most likely.

Let’s be honest. The only reason why people approve of trannies with cocks using the women’s room is because we’re gonna be labeled “bigots” and get hassled if we don’t approve of it. 10 years ago nobody would’ve approved of it because they were allowed to disapprove

imagine thinking that trannies are a legit thing

Trannies are the most annoying retards online especially that sjw trannyfag Sam Collins

there is no tranny
trannies are males, even if they think otherwise

High IQ

Do you go out of your way to find these faggots? I don't encounter them nearly as often.

I heard of that forum so I check em once in a while

That place seems just as soy as Reddit. What a nightmare.

It’s like another clone of IT

some incels #sexist reddit.com

Women openly admit that they have sex with Chad minutes after meeting him for the first time. But guys, you need to become friends with girls and court them for a long time before they agree to sex!

image

(SomeTurdInTheWind)
The more I read about women the more I think that eating pussy is a worthless, humiliating dumb thing for betas who cannot make women cum.

Studies: The number one factor by far determining wether women orgasm or not is their partners' physical attractiveness:

https://www.fpa.org.uk/sites/default/files/orgasms-in-women-an-online-survey.pdf

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915001002

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470491401200507

This is NOT about technique, NOT about practice, NOT about dedication. This is about looking like a male model.

The male model who does not eat pussy or finger at all gives more orgasms to women than the regular guy who eats pussy and fingers.

(SorryBelt)
10 secs holy shit. Imagine the cuck LTR or marriage she's in now. I've seen some fucked shit like this being in a good frat.

How did fratmaxxing work for you?

Just fine honestly. Not like the movie portrays bait still crazy stuff happens. Really happens in college in general if you put yourself out there. I’m on the varsity water polo team so I got an auto bid from any house I wanted.

Good looking GDIs get laid way more than average frat guys if that’s what you’re asking too. They just don’t have access to girls like we do.

(bigantennaemay1)
I'm drunk right now, and in a state of mind where I don't want to believe the black pill, because it feels surreal. But I have to believe it, because it is fact. Life feels like a nightmare that there is no waking up from. But this is the reality. This is what foids are like. And they were never different; they only seemed better in the past as a cover up so they wouldn't face social scrutiny. What is even the point of going on anymore?

(evilcel)
I knew a girl in high school that told me about how she had sex, twice, with a guy 45 minutes after meeting him. Then again the next day.

Another girl I knew regularly had sex with guys she had met that night at parties.

Why the hell did I ever talk to girls? It's just brutal suifuel into a world vastly different from the one I live in.

(aPlaceToRest_)
Foids will hook up with chad within minutes while normie shave to jump hoops and dance like monkeys for years just to get chads sloppy seconds. ALPHA FUCKS BETA BUCKS NEVER FORGET THAT

(TObestcityinworld)
I don't take joy in anyone's misfortune but search for the thread "is anyone here over 35 and at absolute rock bottom" and look at the disaster most of them are...broke, couch-hopping, alcoholism/drug abuse, criminals, abusive/failed or lack of relationships, unemployed/unemployable, cheating partners, depressed, mental issues, debt issues.

There seems to be a few guys commenting there adding their story I have absolutely no idea why.

Templar 331 #sexist mmo-champion.com

If you pass out - say, you are sunbathing on the beach and fall asleep - and I see you are unconscious, and rape you - you accept that it was irresponsible of you to fall asleep?

Blacking out drunk isn't the same as sleeping on the beach, unless you are a REAL deep sleeper. In which case I don't think you should be sleeping on the beach. :/

Do your coworkers have the right to run a train on your unconscious body?

I work with several guys that would do that when I'm conscious. >.> To be fair it would be, I hope, an accident.

Or does it only apply to alcohol?

We have a WINNER!!!

You knowingly put a substance into your body that has a side effect of making you unresponsive for long periods of time while in a place surrounded by people you don't know who are also imbibing the same substance.

If so, have you ever been very drunk? Where you would have been unable to resist, slurred your speech in your refusal so that it was unclear, or have you ever passed out while drunk?

Nope. You know why? BECAUSE I DON'T FUCKING WANT TO BE RAPED!!!! (even though I'm a guy it can still happen)

I get drowsy after half an ale, so I know it wouldn't take much for me to be out for a while.

Or it seems you're saying drinking alcohol is tantamount to 'consenting' to rape.

What we, or at least I, are saying is that when you put yourself in a situation where you are vulnerable you share part of the responsibility of what happened. It's not your fault that you get raped. No one should be raped, but if it does happen and you helped facilitate it then you should grow up an learn that your habits need to change. Drink with friends, drink at home. Don't got to frat parities or bars and get shit faced by yourself.

Lookismisreal #fundie incel.life

I rather be an Incel than a cuck

Let's take a hypothetical situation into an account, where an used up cum dumpster approaches me and makes a proclamation of love towards me saying how it wants to date me and so forth. Now the question stands: would I date it or not? Well, truth be told, I would honestly reject the slut's offer in a heartbeat, without any regrets.

I absolutely refuse to date a femoid who has gotten railed by multiple men. A creature like that will never fucking be girlfriend/or wife material - and anyone who thinks otherwise is a fucking retard. Why do I say such a thing? Simple really, a cumrag who has engaged in rampant promiscuity for most of its life will never be able to stay in a stable monogamous relationship in the long run. The bitch will always have an insatiable desire for wanting to get dicked down by various other men. So knowing all that, why would I want to put myself into a position where I settle down with a slut knowing deep down that not only the bitch isn't really into me, but also would cuck me when the time comes? It makes no sense whatsoever.

Also, this "a cuck at least gets laid" argument need to fucking die. Yes, a low T cuck will be able to get laid once or twice a month, depending if he's lucky enough. But honestly, is it worth? Is getting laid once a month worth it knowing that your whore of a partner is fucking other men behind your back? Is getting laid once a month worth it knowing that your getting someone else's sloppy seconds? Is getting laid once a month worth it knowing that your skank of a partner is only providing you sex because you beg it from it? I think not.

Just because we are Incels that doesn't mean we have to low our standards to a point where we should settle down with a STD riddled bitch with no morals whatsoever. Just fuck that. Call me a fakecel or a volcel if you want, but I rather be an Incel for the rest of my life than date some disgusting, used up, cuntrag.

"James" and his various sockpuppets #fundie mediamatters.org

So disgusting "James" was back on MMfA. Here're today's gems of wingnuttery.

• a few seconds ago

Obama niggér B747 • a minute ago

Your kind wishes GOP shot & killed.

Phil Montag, democrat was happy Majority Whip Steve Scalise was shot at a congressional baseball game practice and wished the Louisiana Republican was dead. How many of your kind celebrated with him?

Avatar
Obama niggér Indy • in a few seconds

What, still not good enough. Keep in mind, 90% of the time here is disrespecting his Eminence Trump.

Look at it in one of 2 ways.

Folks do it, coz they want it back

or

Since they do it, it must be ok.

Obama niggér B747 • a few seconds ago

I hate everyone.

Why do your kind hate gays?

bama niggér waggs03 • a few seconds ago

Because you suck trånny nigger cøck, thats why

•
Reply
•
Share ›

-
Avatar
Obama niggér Obama niggér • in a few seconds

LOL

Obama niggér StratRat • a few seconds ago

Do you suck off that cat?

Obama niggér • a minute ago

< < Michelle Obama

Michelle, please plow me in the ass with your ebola ridden trånny niggér cøck.

- Obama -

Obama niggér dld • a few seconds ago

So no real reason, except for your filthy degenerate diseased depraved sense of pig liberal logic

Obama niggér • in a few seconds

MMMM, liberals, who wants me to puke in your ass?

Afterwards I will ass fuck you.

Obama niggér GOPvsUSA3 • a few seconds ago

He had aids, was a liberal, had a trånny niggér fake cøck hanging out of his ass


Avatar
Red Rose • 3 minutes ago

03272017: Three Oklahoma kids, future liberals, thinking other folks property belongs to them, killed with an AR15.

Gotta love this. And we got away with killing your kind, AGAIN!

Red Rose BigBearcatBill • 10 minutes ago

Funny your kind think Bill is clean since he shoved cigars up a lil girl.

Your kind

Captain Freedom • 12 minutes ago

Liberals are OK with OJ Simpson being released into the public, after he has proven to not be reformed or repentant, by stealing cookies in prison and smirking about it

Red Rose solon • 17 minutes ago

You are nothing but a whiny cum laden queer.

Red Rose Finnibar87 • 17 minutes ago

And our dogs got blow jobs from you


Red Rose • 4 minutes ago

California liberal, Matthew Warner, convicted of fucking then murdering his 3 week year
old daughter. Just as the filthy degenerate depraved diseased pig liberals blame an entire state on the actions of one, the same must be done here. Maybe Matthew wanted the baby aborted, decided the baby needed raped, couldn’t wait for an illegal to do, so he did it.

Liberals, anything degenerate will do.

Red Rose • 7 minutes ago

TREASONUS LIBERALS BLOCKING TRAFFIC THREATENING CORRECT THINKING AMERICANS. CORRECT THINKERS RUN OVER DISEASED LIBERALS. NO CHARGES FILED AGAINST THE CORRECT THINKERS.

Red Rose • a minute ago

Nemias Garcia-Velasco, illegal alien, deported 7 times, drunk driving, kills father of three.

Thank you liberals for giving aid & comfort to illegal’s in sanctuary cities.

Liberals, anything degenerate will do.

ed Rose TMax01 • 9 minutes ago

So you suck cøck on school play grounds?

Red Rose JimWolf359 • a few seconds ago

Democrat State Senator Kevin de Leon calls democrats morally repugnant.

Democrat congress woman Corrine Brown faces fraud charges which could land her in prison for 300 years. Out of $800,000.00 she collected for its charity, only $2,400.00 was spent on charities. The rest she spent on its own filthy degenerate depraved disgusting pig liberal self.

Liberals, anything degenerate will do.

Red Rose • a few seconds ago

Dan Grilo, worked for both Hillary & Obama attacks Carryn Owens, widower of slain seal
William Ryan Owens, calling her an idiot. Your typical filthy degenerate depraved diseased disgusting mentally ill pig liberal.

Red Rose • 2 minutes ago

Rachel Anne Dolezal, a filthy degenerate depraved diseased pig liberal to pretended to be black to get a job at the NACCP, has changed its name to Amare Nkechi Diallo. Which means filthy degenerate trånny nigger in African.

What is wrong with filthy degenerate liberals these days?

Red Rose • a few seconds ago

Baltimore liberal Judge Nicole Taylor releases 18 year old man, after being arrested three times since January 1st for gun & drugs charges. This filthy liberal places no value on American lives as do the rest of liberals dont. It placed restrictions on this 18 year old male nigger, like 1am curfew, etc, etc, but did not think of protecting its fellow Americans from this thug. A day after this nigger was released it was running away from cops with a gun and in his hand. Justifiably the cop shot this thug three times dispatching him into the lap of God. What is wrong with filthy liberals, they give aid & comfort to illegal’s who kill their fellow Americans, now they are releasing thugs from jail to give them another
chance to kill us.

Red Rose • a minute ago

Nancy Piglosi & Elijah Cum in my ear, going on about scapegoat. Piglosi, “Do you know what a scapegoat is? It’s a goat, that we filthy liberals & fucked in the ass Democrats, cum & shit on, and fuck in the asshøle. Then we grease ourselves up, smear lipstick
on our åsses, and chase it down. And at the stroke of midnight, we eat it, while fisting ourselves.

Later, they apologized for letting out trade secrets.

albouski #sexist returnofkings.com

Last year, I decided to stay over at an old friend’s apartment, who had been my roommate back in college. A couple of weeks of residing there, every time I moved in and out of his room, my old buddy would be watching anime on his laptop. His door had a poster of his favorite anime, ‘Sword Art Online’.

He wasn’t an otaku or a dumb weeb, rather to simply put it, it was his pass time or a hobby, to relax from the stress that men face in the modern day world. I remember watching anime as a kid, and I admit, I enjoyed it…

But not anymore.

When he watched anime, he stared at the screen with fascination, as if he was a scientist waiting for the rocket to land on the moon. I was curious, so I asked him to recommend me some anime that he enjoyed. This is where I realized the ugly, misandric nature of anime that teens are exposed to.

The first anime I chose from the list, was about a teenage girl named Misaki, who joined an all boys school which recently opened to girls. She works as a maid to support her family as her father had abandoned them.

...

The “Does Not Like Men” Female Protagonist

Misaki never trusts her male counterparts, and beats them up if they tried something she didn’t approve of. The whole show is centered on how girls can be better than boys, where she terrorizes men, and how these men are portrayed as nothing but pervs, violent, thirsty mindless jerks.

Usui, the male character, after being yelled at for no reason, is strangely drawn to her, and so are the other boys of the school. This hyper misandric woman deemed ‘attractive’ in the eyes of both anime characters and the male fans. This show is targeted towards girls who call it “one of the most romantic anime”.

I was extremely disgusted and had to quit watching within 10 episodes. I couldn’t have a place in my mind to understand how men watch shows like this and enjoy it.

...

This is a common formula used by anime and manga creators to depict a strong independent woman who doesn’t need a man. Female superiority is rising within anime, and young may become some of those ‘nice guys’ who get used by women.

The common genre for anime girls called “tsundere“, which refers to a stubborn woman who is abusive to the man she likes, is very popular, shows like Sword Art Online, Bleach, Toradora, DBZ, etc. I could name a hundred more, but that would mean I would include almost every anime. And not just any people are influenced, but the most desperate men across the world. Men who have never had any luck with women are always attempting to fulfill a woman’s most dangerous desires just to keep her.

These shows are not only designed to destroy the male image and present it as inferior, but also to ruin their self confidence as human beings for being male. In dozens of anime, males are portrayed as either weak, or stupid, similar to how Daddy pig in the cartoon Peppa Pig is simply made to be laughed at, or how the main male cast of the Simpsons slowly degraded into ambition-less couch potatoes and the women becoming political figures.

...

Go-Girl-ism And Male Bashing

If you grew up watching TV in the 1990s, there is no way you escaped seeing at least a few episodes of Sailor Moon. It redefined the “magical girl” genre in its native Japan and its overseas influence has shown up in girl-power shows like The Powerpuff Girls and is the definition of a feminist anime. Haruka and Michiru, the series’ Sailor Uranus and Neptune, were a lesbian couple who helped girls around the world come to terms with their sexuality. The series also makes a point of commenting on how the less traditionally feminine girls have trouble coping with gender roles, like how Makoto learned to cook because she was teased for being a tomboy.

...

The “girl power” concept is counter productive, but unfortunately it’s an inescapable void of entertainment, Charlies Angles, Steven Universe (where the male character is a boy who learns from women), Taylor Swift videos, etc. Australia’s national women’s soccer team the Matildas lose 7-0 to an under FIFTEENS boys’ side, we know that story.

I decided to look up on the internet for further research. Apparently many men have the same opinion. As I’ve read on an MGTOW (anti-feminist, red pill) site:

" “…my friend’s been watching this anime called great teacher onizuka and it makes me fucking cringe. The women in that anime do terrible things to the main character. for instance, there’s a girl who lures him into a laundry mat promising sexual favors, but instead, she takes off her clothes, takes his shirt, puts in on, tears it up a bit, and makes him wear all these kinky things only to scream and call for the police claiming sexual assault. The teacher eventually just acts like it wasn’t a big deal. Also, there’s an episode where a female student of his runs into a building she knows is going to be bombed because she wanted to save a fucking piano.

“…today i witnessed something really disgusting in that anime. The students are on a field trip to a tropical island and one of the boys is kidnapped by three other female students. He’s a small, submissive type so he doesn’t fight back. They tie him up and blind fold him before leading him deep into the jungle. Basically, the leader of the three females wanted to leave him there to die because she hated how much of a loser/crybaby he is. She expressed disdain for how he just listened to whatever people told him to do (sounds familiar). Eventually, the girls realize they’re lost and start blaming the boy for everything. They tell him to man up and get them out of the situation and when he starts to take authority by telling them to remain calm… “"

...

Male disposability in anime was the right word I was looking for. Naruto has plenty of scenes where he is beaten up by women. Not to forget, where I thought Gintama would be free of male bashing, where Shimura Tae, a smiley woman constantly beats up a ‘hairy’ man – simply for asking her out.

Is this supposed to be comedy?

There’s plenty of hentai anime, like Girls Bravo for example, a blue haired boy who is mocked for being short by his female school mates, he is bullied to the point where he’s even ‘allergic’ to women. (Imagine an anime where a girl was treated like trash because she was fat). In one scene of the first episode, the boy accident walks into the bathroom where his female neighbour was taking a shower. She screams and throws a tantrum, she brutally beats him up, where his nose begins to bleed, until he falls into a tub, where he is eventually woken up in a planet where there are only women, however, since he was the only male on the planet, he is sexually harassed constantly through out the episodes and women molest him.

Being an Hentai (porn/pervert/sexual) anime, aimed for men, abusing boys seems to be normalized. In most households of Japan, women control all the finances. I wonder if Japanese men get domestically violated by women the same way as in anime.

Low Birth Rates In Japan

...

Feminization of men is also an issue, perhaps the decline in population is simply because of this hidden feminism in Japan. In Btoom!, a hunger games styled anime, Himiko always carries a stun gun whenever she goes because she is afraid of being touched by men. Her fear of men stems her past experiences with men who attempted to rape her. Her trauma is so severe that she announces to Ryota that every man on the island is her enemy. On two separate occasions when she is about to lose to a man, who is usually attempting to sexually assault her, she was willing to kill herself along with the enemy using a bomb. Almost every man in the anime attempts to assault her. The male protagonist of the story is a ‘wussy’ who simply allows her to treat him with distaste (yet another stereotypical main male character in anime).

While I was on my final anime, which I watched for research, Mirai Nikki, the female character Yuno will resort to cruel and usually violent methods, most of the time coming out of nowhere, that generally end in bloody deaths of anyone who tries to get in the path of the boy she likes, even if they are his close relatives, effectively making her a “Yandere“. The young girl seems to be having the “othello syndrome”, a type of delusional jealousy, marked by suspecting a faithful partner of infidelity, with accompanying jealousy, attempts at monitoring and control, and even violence. Many men often suffer when their wives who are extremely jealous, where as this “yandere” genre is particular that of a girl who stalks her lover, keeps him away from everyone he loves simply because she wants him as her property.

...

I also stumbled upon an incomplete game, about a playable Yandere girl, which had many references to Mirai Nikki, on starting the game I had a picture on what it was about. Your character is simply an emotionless teenage girl who harbors feelings for a guy who doesn’t even know she exists. Your mission is to stalk him, and try to eliminate “rivals”, so that she has him for herself. By eliminate meaning, to kill. The game would even include your crush’s sister, who has a chance of being a rival. (Think of a scenario where a boy would be stalking a girl, taking her belongings, sniffing or licking them to gain arousal, where he tries to keep her friends away from her, there would be a different response)

In the basement of the game, one would come across tape recording, when played, it reveals that your character’s mother (I assume) murdered everyone close to her crush, and tied him down onto a chair, forcing him to give in to her requests.

...

Recently, I was informed that the developing team had added a tsundere character and a pedophile teacher into the game, who would seduce him perhaps, I don’t feel the need to talk anymore about it.

A pedophilic female teacher who preys on a teenage boy’s sexuality. There’s plenty of harem (a anime with one guy and many female characters) where he is eventually mistreated by his female counterparts. Even many of Hayao Miyazaki’s films are centered on young “strong empowered” girls. When asked about it, he said:

"“When we compare a man in action and a girl in action, I feel girls are more gallant. If a boy is walking with a long stride, I don’t think anything particular, but if a girl is walking gallantly, I feel ‘that’s cool’. Maybe that’s because I’m a man, and women may think it’s cool when they see a young man striding. At first, I thought ‘this is no longer the era of men‘.But after ten years, I grew tired of saying that. I just say ‘cause I like women’. They are more reality.”"

All these point out why there are sites entirely dedicated to feminism in anime.

Yesterday, I decided to get in touch with my friend, to ask him about his life and job. He’s a stereotypical “nice guy” who remains friend zoned. He lets women pinch his cheeks and push him, when he just laughs it off. If a woman does something unfair to him, he simply sweeps it under the rug.

“I’m not interested in dating currently” he said when I asked him if he had a girlfriend. Either anime had terrorized him to protecting his virginity, or he’s simply happy being treated like a loser in a tsundere anime by his female co-workers, just like the great teacher Onizuka.

Rod Dreher #racist theamericanconservative.com

I've been thinking that the US is in a May 1968 moment, but that’s probably too optimistic. A reader who is a prominent Washingtonian (he identified himself, and I verified it; I’m not using his name to protect him) wrote this morning to say that he and a number of people he know are leaving the city for good in the wake of this past week’s violence. He writes, and I quote with his permission:

I’m out. I’ve lived in this city most of my life, and I’ve loved it. But I’m not lying to myself any more. I can see where this is going. It’s obvious. I don’t want to be here for what happens next. The city has been taken over by extremists who worship conformity and violence. They don’t care how many people they hurt. This is a religious cult. All that matters to them is race theology.

A friend from my neighborhood just got screamed by a high school girl on his street. He’s known her since she was born. He likes her parents. They’ve never had a single problem. Now the girl has decided my friend isn’t sufficiently supportive of Black Lives Matter. So as he paused at a Stop sign this morning at the end of his block, she approached his window and yelled “F*ck you!” right in his face.

There’s a lot of that going on here. Among the many ironies: what they’re doing now is racist. It guarantees a resurgence of white racism, and of intentional segregation. Everyone who thinks about that knows it’s true. No one cares. It’s all so incredibly dark. I don’t want to be around it. I definitely don’t want my kids around it. I’m fleeing, and I’m never coming back.

This reader, who is white, lives in one of the nicer neighborhoods in the city. Thinking of that girl in his neighborhood, I thought of this from Live Not By Lies, about how the Russian Revolution advanced years before actual fighting broke out, when the parents of the privileged refused to stand up to their children:

Most of the revolutionaries came from the privileged classes. Their parents ought to have known that this new political faith their children preached would, if realized, mean the collapse of the social order. Still, they did not reject their children. Writes Slezkine, “The ‘students’ were almost always abetted at home while still in school and almost never damned when they became revolutionaries.” Perhaps the mothers and fathers didn’t want to alienate their sons and daughters. Perhaps they too, after the experience of the terrible famine and the incompetent state’s inability to care for the starving, had lost faith in the system.

It’s happening here now. Trump is our Nicholas II: too weak and indecisive and lacking in credibility to do a damn thing about it.

Meanwhile, I’m hearing that there are conservative Americans in the DC area who are talking about attempting to emigrate to one of the Visegrad countries (Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland). They see no hope anymore here. I am reminded of this piece from Mark Bollobas that I published in 2018. He is the UK-born son of two Hungarians who fled communism in the 1960s and took refuge in Britain. Now, as an adult who lived for a time in America, he has returned to his parents’ home city, Budapest, to raise his own family. He wrote then:

But as a graduate of a US university, I didn’t see the American dream at all. I didn’t see opportunity, I saw neglect. I saw a country which is still the Wild West, full of hucksters getting rich quick on one end of the spectrum, and hero entrepreneurs who did the same on the other. A country where the police are super paranoid and trigger-happy, where life meant nothing, and although everyone went to church in Memphis (buckle of the Bible belt), racism was everywhere. Fear was everywhere. Distrust was everywhere.

Why not settle in his home country, Britain? He had lived and worked in London, but knew that he would never be able to afford to live there. And this:
And culturally, the most important of all, the England of today is so far removed from the England of my youth that it feels like a different world. What makes England great is the nonchalant English attitude to everything. Stiff upper lip. Humor. The genuine lack-of-interest in what other people do, as long as they’re not interfering. The moral strength to play fair, be a good loser, etc.

But over the last few decades this has been eroded by non-English immigrants who have moved to the UK permanently and brought their culture with them, aggressively. Usually the children are far more aggressive than the parents who actually made the move. And the English let this happen, because that’s how they are. Now the politeness is gone.

I ran a bar in Finsbury Park. My schedule was the same. Open at noon, close at midnight. I would go to work at around 10am, and walk home around 2am. You have the same schedule, and you walk past people who share that schedule. In England, 20 years ago, if you did this for a few weeks you’d eventually strike up a conversation, or create a little bond. That couldn’t happen in Finsbury Park because it was full of Somalis, north Africans and others (Abu Hamza was a personal favorite, hawking his vitriolic sermons on CDs to anyone that passed).

They all hated me and looked at me with distrust and disgust. The women walked past in their veils, clothing that sends the message of “f-ck off, don’t dare look at me or talk to me.” I walked those streets for two years and made not one connection. Visitors have come, have brought their culture, and they stick to it (I loved whichever day it was when they say you have to slaughter a goat; blood literally ran in the streets). It is their identity. Meanwhile the beautiful, accepting element of being British is abused, its kind culture allowed Trojan horses of all sorts to settle in.

He continues:

My decision to move back here to Hungary — I say that even though I wasn’t born here — has been reinforced by this fact: Hungary understands that holding on to its cultural identity is essential to its existence as a society we can understand.

Culture changes over time, of course, but it normally does it slowly as we creep towards a more civilized future.
England doesn’t feel more civilized — quite the opposite. It feels more feral. And the UK has just accepted its fate.

The lack of an American culture means Hungarians don’t know what’s missing, because they never had it. But there is a gaping hole in America: something is obviously broken. America is collapsing on itself.

It’s been nine years since I moved back. I can’t count the number of days I’ve thought to myself, or told others, “It’s just great to be here.” It still is.

Read it all. Bollobas has ancestral roots there, though, and can speak the language. He didn’t grow up in Hungary, but culturally, he can relate to the place. If I were in government in one of the Visegrad countries, I would start working on a program to entice emigration from dissatisfied Americans who have something to contribute, in terms of human capital and financial capital, to my country. When I was in Budapest last fall in a group meeting with Viktor Orban, he told us that conservatives should always consider Budapest their home. I expect there will be no small number of Americans who can afford it, and who can work from anywhere online, who will want to know more.

Meanwhile, in Minneapolis, a white city council member is challenging the people of the city to put up with home invasions and break-ins for the sake of racial change:

If you are a comfortable white person asking to dismantle the police I invite you to reflect: are you willing to stick with it? Will you be calling in three months to ask about garage break-ins? Are you willing to dismantle white supremacy in all systems, including a new system?

She, and other members of the city council, say they are going to dismantle the police department. Not reform it — disband it. From an essay by a council member, writing in Time magazine:

We can reimagine what public safety means, what skills we recruit for, and what tools we do and do not need. We can play a role in combating the systems of white supremacy in public safety that the death of black and brown lives has laid bare. We can invest in cultural competency and mental health training, de-escalation and conflict resolution. We can send a city response that that is appropriate to each situation and makes it better. We can resolve confusion over a $20 grocery transaction without drawing a weapon or pulling out handcuffs.

If you are a Minneapolis home or business owner, the handwriting is on the wall.

Meanwhile, the scandal at The New York Times is turning into a watershed for American journalism:

As the controlling mobs of the NYT wield enormous political power via info warfare and thought control, no self-respecting conservative or GOP politician (or their staff) should cooperate in any way with *any* of their articles. Any who do should be shamed.

I expect a number of disgusted conservatives to follow suit. Everybody knows that the Times is a liberal paper, but this newsroom coup is turning it into an illiberal left-wing paper. This has been coming for a long time, in both journalism and academia. Some years ago, I published a comment by a conservative academic who said that he is the lone conservative in his department, but he feels safe under the leadership of the old-fashioned liberal who is department head. But when that Boomer generation retires, it’s over. The Millennials and Gen Zers behind them are Jacobins, he said.

The Jacobin generation is taking over the Times now. They will also be consolidating power within other media institutions, under the guise of racial justice. Anyone who is not willing to swear allegiance to the Social Justice left has no future. Do you want to spend your career propagandizing? Similarly with academia: how many ideological re-education programs can you tolerate? How much ideological poisoning of scholarship and teaching are you prepared to submit to? It’s coming.

How many lies are you willing to tell, or assent to, to participate in this rotten system?

What sacrifices are you prepared to make to live in truth, and not by lies?

A lawyer reader told me this morning that the Benedict Option may soon be the Benedict Imperative. I asked him to explain. He responded:

There is a plausible (though not inevitable) scenario where we get a legal and cultural regime that fully adopts critical race theory, the obliteration of any stable definition of the family (this is already happening in the courts everywhere), and that does what it already says it believes to dissenters from the ascendant sexual ethic. All of these things operating at even 30% of capacity (and backed up by a privately imposed social credit like system), would make life increasingly difficult for those who won’t give a pinch of incense to Caesar on these things. Under this scenarios, the small-o orthodox Church and its members would get much smaller and poorer, and BenOp would lose the “option” part, as it would be the only plausible path forward.

I do believe this is coming, which is why I wrote The Benedict Option, and Live Not By Lies. We are rapidly moving to a new political order, a new media order, and a new social order. The story I started this post with — of the prominent Washingtonian leaving the city for good — is a symbol of what Alasdair MacIntyre talks about here:

A crucial turning point in that earlier history occurred when men and women of good will turned aside from the task of shoring up the Roman imperium and ceased to identify the continuation of civility and moral community with the maintenance of that imperium. What they set themselves to achieve instead…was the construction of new forms of community within which the moral life could be sustained so that both morality and civility might survive the coming ages of barbarism and darkness.

The imperium is crumbling. What replaces it will be worse, no doubt, but the conditions that made the imperium sustainable no longer obtain.

What does it look like to you, from where you sit this afternoon? What is the future for you and your family?

Michael Pearl #fundie patheos.com

[From the first chapter of Created To Need A Help Meet by Michael Pearl. The infamous story everyone keeps referring to…]

My immediate goal in marriage was to make up for all those sexually frustrated years—the sooner the better. A friend of mine that married two years before I did had bragged that he was able to ‘know’ his bride five times on their wedding night. He was a puny fellow, so I had no doubt I would beat his brag, but the truth is, three times is all I could muster, and just barely. I quickly realized a single man’s concept of marriage was a bit different than the real thing. After all, it was midnight before we got to our room, and we were up at six headed to the Gulf Coast where we would honeymoon for a few days in a cottage on the beach.
It was a long day’s drive. We arrived at the cottage well after dark. We had brought all the gear for fishing and crabbing, as well as the groceries for her to prepare our meals. That way we could save a lot of money and be able to stay longer in the cabin. We dug all of the gear out of the station wagon and placed it in the cabin. Deb fixed us a big supper, after which I tried to break my record. One time and I was asleep. I woke in the middle of the night and remembered that crabs sometimes run along the beach, so I work Deb and excitedly said, “Let’s go crabbing!”
My new Mrs. complained about me not giving her enough time to find her tennis shoes. They were still packed somewhere and I was raring to go. Anyway I had seen her going barefoot many times. As we scurried along the beach she complained about not having a flashlight. I was using it up ahead to scout the way and chase crabs. I heard her say something about shells hurting her feet. For the next hour or two I ran along the seashore and she dragged along behind carrying my crab sack. I put out some of those little round traps with bait in them and we eventually got about six or eight of the little pinching critters—not enough for a meal.
That was my first time to ever go crabbing and I was having a ball. What more could a fellow ask for?
A cottage on the beach, a hot wife, plenty of crabs…this was living! We made it back to the cottage where we grabbed a couple of hours of sleep before I woke up hungry and had to make love to a woman half asleep. She was willing but not very active.
Afterward she got up and fixed us a fine breakfast. Great cook. Her mother taught her well. She wanted to go back to sleep but I talked her into going out for more crabs. By mid-afternoon we had a sack full of crabs and headed back to the cottage. Wow, was I tired. I told her I would just take a little nap while she prepared supper. I don’t know how long I slept but I awoke to her screeching and jumping about with crabs crawling all over the cabin. The silly girl had left the sack open when she was trying to get the first crab in the huge boiling kettle. I sat up in bed and offered some constructive advice and she had a personality change right there in front of me, and us not yet married 48 hours. Who could have imagined a female could carry on in such a crazy manner? I tried to calm her down but she just stomped off, leaving the French fries turning black in the hot smoking oil and the crabs crawling. I yelled at her retreating form, “I don’t need to hunt crabs; I married one!” Somehow that one remark has hung around our marriage like a ticked-off ghost. It seemed appropriate at the time.
To her credit she did come back and finish cooking. After we ate I was ready for some more sex, but she just wanted to sleep. I had read in a marriage book how women always have excuses, like being sleepy, having a headache, etc. There was a great sense of satisfaction when I was so completely able to change her mind; it wasn’t that difficult. She is wired right. It made me sleepy so I dozed off again. I was just dropping off when I heard the crash. It came from the bathroom. She looked dead l\ying there all twisted up in a weird position half in half out of the shower. The curtain and the rod lay flung out on the floor around her and water was spraying everywhere. It was one scary moment – my new bride dead on our honeymoon. I quickly turned off the water and bent to cradle her in my arms. I gently shook her while examining her injured forehead, which was quickly swelling and turning blue, “What’s wrong honey? Are you sick?”
After she opened her eyes it took her a minute to focus and then her expression changed. It was a mixture of pity and anger, although her voice was like a deep sigh as she whispered, “You really don’t know do you?” Man, it sounded like she was accusing me or something! Since she was hurt I let her have her say and boy, she laid it on.
She sat up, pulling herself away from me, turning where she could look me square in the face. The gist of what she said was something along these lines: “In the last 48 hours I haven’t slept more than two hours undisturbed. My feet have 20 or more tiny holes in them because you wouldn’t let me take an extra five minutes to unpack my tennis shoes. My shoulder is sore from trying to carry thirty pounds of crabs for hours (they didn’t weight that much.) My hand is burned from trying to stuff a fighting crab into a kettle of boiling water, which seems very much like torturing the poor thing, AND, all the while you lay in a state of repose. Due to lack of sleep and sun, my eyes feel like they are full of sand. I have had little to eat. I am female, for crying out loud. I just want to sleep without you pawing on me. Besides, I have body parts I didn’t even know existed until now and they are killing me….so what is wrong with me??? I’m the weaker vessel, remember? It’s in the Bible, chapter one, verse one….or somewhere.”
Strange creatures, these females. My brother never acted like that when we traveled together holding evangelistic services. “Well, she will get adjusted.” I thought.

John Engelman #racist amren.com

Seeing the Light, Darkly

My parents taught me not to hate blacks. I still try not to. Sometimes, certain blacks make that difficult for me. I am ambivalent about the black race. I recommend ambivalence. It prevents fanaticism. I never attended a school where blacks made up more than five percent of the student body. That gave me an unrealistically benign opinion of the black race. I supported the civil rights movement as a child, a teenager, and a young adult. Although I did not sympathize with the black riots that happened between 1964 to 1968, they did not anger me either. In retrospect, they should have.

During the riots that followed the murder of Martin Luther King, Jr in 1968, I took the wrong exit off the freeway that circles Washington, DC and ended up in Anacostia, the blackest, poorest, and most dangerous part of the city. I could smell the smoke from the stores that had been looted and burned. I could see blacks staring angrily at me. I was lost, and couldn’t find the freeway. The car I was driving was on the fritz and I was terrified. Fortunately, I found a platoon of soldiers who had been sent to quell the riot. I got good directions from the lieutenant and drove home.

But I have had good experiences with blacks as well. At Howard University, there was a black English professor I befriended. He would invite me to parties at his apartment, which I always happily attended. I was usually the only white person, and there were never any problems with that. One day I found out that Prof. Johnson was learning ancient Greek. He showed me some Greek from a Loeb Classics book, and read aloud from it, translating as he went, word for word. I asked him, “You are already fluent in French and German. Why are you learning a language as difficult as ancient Greek?” He answered, “I want to show those white boys what I can do.” If Prof. Johnson was typical of black men, there would be no racial problems.

My path towards race realism began in September of 1971, when I read an article by Professor Richard Herrnstein of Harvard in the Atlantic entitled “IQ.” In it, he made the case for cognitive differences being profound, genetic, and racial. I found the article depressing and disturbing, but convincing. The New Left organization, the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), held a convention at Harvard the next spring with the expressed purpose of getting Professors Herrnstein and Arthur Jensen of Berkeley fired for their research on intelligence. This disturbed me even more than Professor Herrnstein’s article. Until then, I had seen the right as the offender against intellectual freedom with loyalty oaths, witch hunts, and black lists. Although SDS soon ceased to exist, a precedent for suppressing hereditarianism and race realism had been set. The fact that hereditarians and race realists were suppressed rather than rationally refuted inclined me to think the hereditarians and the race realists were right.

Today I live on the edge of the black ghetto in one of the most dangerous cities in the United States. Since moving here, I have been mugged six times, twice on the same night, when I was nearly murdered. Blacks did it every time. Don’t tell me to move. I can’t afford to. Two of the muggings were fairly typical: while walking home, “youths” threw me to the ground, and stole the money in my wallet before I could respond.

The third time was on the grounds of my apartment complex. The black mugger was larger, stronger, and younger than I am. This time I tried to resist, but to no avail. He kept punching me in the face yelling, “Where’s the money?” He beat me up worse than Trayvon Martin beat up George Zimmerman. I had black eyes for a week, and my left eye was bloodshot for just as long. I am fortunate I did lose my sight in that eye.

A year later, I was attacked by two blacks as I walked home from a neighborhood tavern one evening. They stole everything I had. Dazed, I walked back to the bar hoping to find help, but they had already closed and the door was locked. Then two more blacks attacked me. When they realized I had nothing left to steal, they got angry and began to beat me. Luckily, the bartender, a black woman, drove by on her way home from work and saw what was happening. She stopped her car, and put an end to the beating at the risk of her own life, then took me home.

Two Sundays later, two blacks attacked me as I walked to a drug store. By then, I had started carrying pepper foam with me for self-defense. I used it for the first time on these two attackers, but unfortunately, the stream of foam I shot at them was too thin, and they blocked it with their hands, so I was mugged all the same.

My repeated victimization at the hands of blacks caused me to start discussing the sensitive topic of race and crime. One liberal woman I spoke to about this suggested I read Tim Wise’s essay “The Color of Deception: Race, Crime and Sloppy Social Science.” This was an effort to refute the American Renaissance report, “The Color of Crime.” In his essay, Mr. Wise argued that the problem of black crime is exaggerated. He did not convince me. “The Color of Crime” did convince me. I have been reading American Renaissance ever since. I know now just how much scientific evidence there is that backs up what I have learned on my own: the races are intrinsically different in the qualities necessary for civilization: intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy. Unfortunately, and as Jared Taylor has said, race is an area where the more one ignores scientific evidence, the more enlightened one is said to be.

In addition to knowledge about genetics and heredity, I have acquired some street smarts. I never needed to take any precautions when I lived with whites, or poor Vietnamese war refugees — but living near blacks requires readiness. I now have a larger canister of pepper spray with a range of nine feet. A mugger cannot block it, and I have it with me every time I leave my apartment. It has served me well. The first time I used it was when a black man asked me for money. When I took out my wallet to give him some, he grabbed for the wallet itself. I sprayed him in the face, and got home with all my possessions still on my person. On another occasion, a black man grabbed me as I walked home. I took out my pepper spray. He let me go. Most recently was when I was walking past two blacks and one told me menacingly, “Give me your money.” When I took out my pepper spray, he shouted, “He’s got pepper spray. Leave him alone!”

I have known too many blacks I liked to dislike the entire race. I have had too many experiences with black crime to have any illusions about them. You could say I have led an exciting life. I would rather watch it on television.

Chechar #racist chechar.wordpress.com

Over the internet boards I find it bothersome when typical neonazis demand that I dismiss the Holocaust stories as hoax; and that if I fail to do it my morals are beyond the pale.

...

I am in my middle fifties now and don’t have the time nor the motivation to research the Holocaust claims and counter-claims. For me it is enough to point out that two former Holocaust revisionists, Mark Weber, the director of the Institute of Historical Review, and David Irving, the famed historian of the Third Reich, have changed their minds over the years, both accepting now that a few millions of Jews probably died during the war. According to an email of March 16, 2014 sent to me by Irving himself, his book on Herr Himmler will be released later in this year. Irving’s forthcoming book quotes historical records proving that, even though the six-million figure is an invention, a few millions of Jews probably died as a result of harsh Nazi treatments.

But I would like to go beyond the scruples of our best historian in the field. Joseph Walsh recently stated in my blogsite that “The Truth is that the glad stirrings of genocide lurk in the heart of every man, yet only the Nazis had the courage to acknowledge the Truth.” Panina, a Swede that in 2012 used to comment in my blogsite, went even further

...

It must be comical for the Nietzscheans of the North that, unlike the monocausalism ubiquitously present in the neonazi and white nationalist movement, Himmler acknowledged other factors: “Our people’s thinking was misled by the forces of the Church, Liberalism, Bolshevism, and Jewry.” And let us never forget Hitler’s own words in one of his table talks: “The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity.” If neonazis were true Nazis and had transvalued Christian/Neo-Christian values they would be trying to demonstrate that Himmler’s Posen Speech in 1943 is genuine, not a hoax as they claim, and even find genocidal inspiration from the speech.

Of course: they will never do it because all of them are Neo-Christian pseudo-Nazis. Speaking with a little humor I would say that neonazis, white nationalists, and American southern nationalists subscribe what we may call the Harry Potter approach to the Jewish problem. Throughout those novels for children, the female author presents us a Harry who never uses “Avara Kadavra,” the killing spell against the bad guys; Harry only uses the disarming charm, “Expelliarmus.” But only in novels and movies for kids the good guys, who never are depicted as cold assassins, can win. In real life you have to make a transition to the dark side to become a soldier.

...

I have read The Turner Diaries twice. When I read it for the first time, or rather listened the audio version with Pierce’s own voice, I was still struggling with the last remnants my Neo-Christian programming. I didn’t like the Breivik-like cruelties: for example the killing of an innocent black—the first killing of the novel—or the dispatching of an entire group of pro-white warriors for not taking care of the Jewish problem in Toronto. And in the novel’s Day of the Rope I was troubled by the description that many innocent young women also die. Then I read most of Covington’s Quintet and sensed a moral difference. Covington’s characters are not so bloodthirsty, not so genocidal exterminators. I could imagine myself doing the things in Covington’s novels but in the past some passages of the Diaries made me wonder…

But now that I have definitively left behind Christian axiology I can see that Pierce was ultimately right. As NS soldiers in the coming racial wars, altogether imbued in the martial qualities of gravitas and severitas, we must behave. The huge difference between the Quintet and the Diaries is that in Pierce’s world not only an ethno-state is born: in the final pages it’s described that only the white race shall inherit the Earth.

...

Covington does not believe that millions of Jews died as a result of harsh treatment by the National Socialist Germans. Unlike Panina, Walsh and a few others, he is still stuck in Neo-Christian values. (I would dare to say that the stirrings of genocide should lurk in the heart of every transvalued white, which means accepting as grim necessity what seventy years ago happened to the subversive tribe.)

Dincel_Washington #sexist reddit.com

The irony of the ‘entitlement’ argument

A common claim leveled at incels is that they think they’re entitled to sex and relationships. This argument, in reality, is not only baseless but also backwards. Incels don’t claim to be entitled to sex, nor do they claim to deserve sex simply for existing - in fact, the exact reverse is true. Incels recognize that the only thing which, in practice, entitles anyone to sex is a sufficient amount of sexual attractiveness - nothing else. They acknowledge that in the real world, people who are universally attractive can reasonably expect sex, and people who are universally unattractive can not, no matter how entitled anyone in either group acts.

Ask yourself - how do people act who ACTUALLY feel they are entitled to sex, to the use of women’s bodies? They rape. They sexually assault. They make forceful, unwanted sexual advances towards women in reality. Where does this happen? On forums? Or in Frat houses, bars, slums, and within relationships? And yet the greatest, most concentrated vitriol is directed towards the internet words of isolated, suicidal virgins.

To add to the contradiction, the same people who make these claims tell incels that the only reason they are virgins is because they don’t respect women, or because they aren’t nice to women. The irony here is obvious - it is in fact INCELS who recognize that nothing you do, no amount of niceness, or courtesy, or respect, entitles you to sex. If anyone at all believes that certain acts or behaviors entitle one to sex, it’s those who parrot this deluded, banal advice.

Exactly, I can never fully understand why people are so bothered with us saying that looks matter.

If you say that aliens exist, you get a few chuckles here and there, many just ignore you and heck a few normies and stacies actually agree with you. Yet we have zero proof about extra terrestrials existing.

On the other hand, the second you say that looks matter a lot when it comes to dating, boom the whole world comes onto you like a ton of bricks, despite there being ample evidence out there.

The world only wants your money to be spent on women and nothing else. If you are not getting sex out of it they don't give a fuck.

Men function as resource generators for women - be it economic (betabux), social (cucks/normies), or sexual (chad). If you refuse to generate, it’s off to the scrap heap with you.

It's because they're fucking sadistic pieces of shit who twist reality so they can bully lonely, vulnerable men.

People on IT will (correctly) point out that most sexual crimes are perpetrated by existing sexual partners & male friends... neither of those groups contains any incels. Maybe the latter contains a tiny number but it's trivial.

We aren't the ones going around doing these things to women. It's utterly laughable that IT thinks anyone on these forums has the confidence to grope a woman or whatever. Literally laughable.

Simple, many actual misogynists have paid their dues by being attractive to women. Normies do by showering praise and money. Incels are no use as all we do is reveal the truth about the scam, and that’s a no-no. They have to shut that down at all costs, lest the hamster wheels stop running.

Its all mental gymnastics to rationalize that they hate us simply because were low status and ugly

Many of them are as well. But as long as they convince themselves they’re the ‘good’ virgins, they don’t have to face the fact that they are getting the exact same amount of sex as us despite ‘respecting women’.

No-one feels entitled to something they have never had. Poor people don't feel entitled to a millions dollar trust fund like the son of a rich kid feels entitled to his dads money.

Incels don't feel entitled to stacies pussy like a chad who has had hundreds of girls throw themselves his way.

People who have never been popular or received attention don't feel entitled to becoming a holywood celebrity.

Sure poor kids might grow up dreaming of being rich, unpopular kids might grow up dreaming of becoming famous and incels might grow up dreaming of a loving relationship.

But none of them feel entitled to it lmao, it's the other way around. The jock thinks he will become an athlete/slayer, the popular stacy thinks she will become famous, the rich kid thinks he will inherit his dads money and become a successful businessman.

Exactly. It’s like telling an starving Nigerian “um, you’re not entitled to filet minion” when he’s never consumed more than 17 calories at a time.

William Grimes #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Sermon 2: Purity and Chastity
By Rev. William H. Grimes
It's time that we discuss a very important chapter in the Bible: I Corinthians 7. I Corinthians 7 talks about married life and the single life. Liberal theologians take this passage as meaning that there is inherent value in marriage, and that marriage is better than being single. The command to "be fruitful and multiply" was ONLY for the immediate descendants of Adam and Eve. It was NOT meant to be a command in 2017! Yet people are breeding like rabbits! Fornicators such as US President Donald Trump are partially to blame for the emulation of wicked behaviors because in the eyes of the Lord Trump was never married, thus guilty of fornication, and his current "marriage" with Melania Trump is an adulterous affair!
I Corinthians 7:1 says that "Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman." Clear as crystal, plain as day! Yet these liberals are insistent upon theological sloppiness. IT IS GOOD FOR A MAN NOT TO TOUCH A WOMAN. What in the world do you think that means besides the fact that IT IS GOOD FOR A MAN NOT TO TOUCH A WOMAN?! Can Paul articulate this point any clearer?! Are you liberals dense?!!!
I Corinthians 7:8 likewise states "I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I." Even the liberal NIV says that "Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do." If even the liberal pro-abortion virgin birth denying NIV can be correct about this crucial issue, what is the excuse of these scores of other liberals who do not recognize the fact that this passage says that it is not good for a man to touch a woman, and that it is BETTER for men to stay unmarried and live lives of celibacy?
Liberals love to clap back with the following verse, which says "But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn." However, this does NOT say that most or all men should marry. Only men who absolutely lack self control and cannot remain chaste and then fall into fornication shall marry. A very different concept, right?! These men are seen as weaker in the Kingdom of God, and they get less reward in heaven for they had the reward of sexual gratification on Earth. Heaven has treasures far beyond the simple and fleeting pleasure of sexual gratification, and sexual gratification is completely unnecessary for humans, and people live fine lives and accomplish great things without it. Christian Sir Isaac Newton was one of the most brilliant minds that God has blessed this world with, and he never desired sexual gratification and lived a life of excellence for God and also his fellow man. This is what we need to set kids up for, not for ignoring God in favor of sexual gratification, marriage, and childrearing! It takes up a lot of time that could be spent worshiping God instead!
Back to the Trump situation, this chapter also says that "And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband: But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife. But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away. And the woman which hath an husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let her not leave him."(I Corinthians 7:10-13) Donald Trump "married" Ivana Trump, but that was even a sham marriage because she is still married to Alfred Winklmayr, who she "divorced" right before marrying Trump, and after Ivana divorced Donald, she had two more "marriages" and "divorces" that are shams unto the Lord, as Ivana is still married to Alfred! Since Ivana has never reconciled with Alfred, and Donald has never been validly married in the eyes of the Lord, Donald is guilty of fornication and Ivana is an adultress! "First Lady" Melania Trump is "married" to Donald Trump in the eyes of the world, and Melania is nothing but a porn star and a trophy wife who has never glorified the Lord! Say what else you want about Michelle Obama, but at least she had some class and dignity, and was not an adulteress! Such a sinful and wicked and prideful man the "godly" have elected to lead the USA! Woe to America! Melania Trump is WICKED AND DECEITFUL AND SINFUL AND LACKS CLASS AND DIGNITY BECAUSE SHE HATES THE THINGS OF GOD AND LOVES MAMMON!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To conclude, the wicked Americans need to WAKE UP and realize the sham that is excessive marriage and fornication and adultery because sexual gratification IS NOT A HUMAN RIGHT and Onanism and other forms of impurity are NOT FOR THE GODLY and marriage is only for WEAK MEN WHO CANNOT CONTAIN THEIR PASSION LEST THEY FALL INTO FORNICATION, and if you marry and have sexual exploits, YOU WILL BE A LESSER BEING IN THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN PROVIDED YOU CAN BE A MAN WHO ONLY HAS ONE WIFE AND ONE LOVER! God's people said AMEN!

Beer_Grills #sexist reddit.com

Blackpill of the day: Chad landmines are everywhere

If you manage to looksmax and socialmax, and crawl your way out of inceldom and finally get a girlfriend, be aware of omnipresent Chad landmines. And this is also a warning to the beta normies lurking this sub.

One day if Chad is bored and horny, and notices your mildly attractive or even ugly girlfriend, and he gets the idea in his head that he wants to pump and dump her in a sloppy one night stand. Chances are 80-90% that he will be able to do that.

And it's not exactly uncommon these days, there are millions of feral Chads running around who had no proper parenting and will do this kind of stuff just because they are bored.

There's also a high chance he won't use protection and she will give birth to his demon spawn. Which she will likely claim to be yours, and you'll end up raising his child as a beta cuck provider.

PS! This is why you looksmax and gymcel. If you do get a gf eventually, then you want to be able to physically dominate or at least match potential Chads and tell them to fuck off.

PPS! This is not meant to discourage incels from trying to get laid or get a gf. It doesnt discourage me. This is just a blackpill reality. Infidelity is real and more common now than ever. Better to accept it now than be ignorant and shocked if/when it happens.

NewGenious119 #fundie sluthate.com

Seriously, is there something mentally wrong with you? Thinking that a school full of sluts and frat stars getting slain by an incel is a bad thing is characteristic of a normalfag mindset. Our ONLY hope for ever getting to fuck multiple hot sluts is if there are enough incels in the western world who snap and cause bloodshed. It's the only way that sluts and alphas will realize and accept that there are serious consequences for allowing so many males to live their lives in misery.

Pi Kappa Phi North Carolina University Chapter #fundie talkingpointsmemo.com

A fraternity at North Carolina State University was suspended Thursday after a so-called "pledge book" containing disturbing statements about rape and lynching surfaced.

The suspension is the latest in a string of punishments for fraternity members' alleged misconduct at various universities across the country -- most notably at University of Oklahoma, where a video of a fraternity chapter's racist chant went viral and sparked national outrage.

Local TV station WRAL reported a "pledge book" that appeared to belong to NC State's chapter of Pi Kappa Phi was found Thursday at a restaurant near campus. The book was filled with "racially and sexually charged language and derogatory comments about women and children," according to the news outlet.

"It will be short and painful, just like when I rape you," one comment read.

"If she's hot enough, she doesn't need a pulse," another said.

"That tree is so perfect for lynching," read a third.

Some of the comments in the book were signed. WRAL matched those names to a list of frat members listed on the chapter's website.

The report noted that the list of names was scrubbed after a WRAL reporter dropped by the frat house, however. The fraternity chapter's Facebook and Twitter feeds appear to have been scrubbed as well.

Pi Kappa Phi's national organization said it decided to put the NC State chapter on interim suspension while it investigates the pledge book.

“The quotes in the book are reprehensible and unacceptable. We have sent staff to Raleigh to investigate the circumstances of the situation,” the national fraternity's CEO, Mark E. Timmes, said in a statement. “These statements are inconsistent with the values of Pi Kappa Phi and will not be tolerated.”

bbbbwindows #fundie phys.org

This is approaching the insane. I thought black holes had gravity so intense not even light could escape. I guess this is the consequence of employing a mathematical model that is not observed or confirmed.
Has anyone even seen Donald Scott's presentation to NASA Goddard's astrophysicists in 2009 regarding the "electric sky"?. Has anyone even heard of Halton Arp's work essentially proving that red shift is a function of age, not distance. Good bye Big Bang. Nobel prize winners Alfvens and Langmuir have shown beyond doubt that Biirkeland's findings were right on the money. Any cosmologist that is not fluent in the terms of plasma physics (i.e. "Z Pinch") has no chance of properly interpreting the newest radio telescope data.
Neutron stars either were born at the time of the big bang or accreted. How did the 1st 2 neutrons accrete??? They didn't.
It pains me to say that even Einstein had great doubts about relativity. "Spooky action at a distance" troubled him to his grave.

What this showed was the speed of light was not Vmax. This invalidates the theory of relativity. So 2 generations of astrophysicists and cosmologists have followed a brilliant man down the wrong road. They failed to address his concerns. In 1921 Tesla stated relativity was like a "beggar in a purple robe". Even Einstein was concerned that relativity required the absence of the "ether" proposed by Tesla. He said he "knew it must be there". Today it is known as plasma.
Anthony Peratt's work at Los Alamos in plasma physics will win the Nobel prize, Showing spiral galaxy formation with plasma physics experiments was groundbreaking. That the necessary velocities were present obviated the need for black holes or dark matter. Similar results were obtained to invalidate the concept of neutron stars. All that is needed to interpret the newest radio telescope data is a knowledge of plasma physics.
The electromagnetic forces that formed the universe are now being properly addressed.

Anonymous #conspiracy stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com

I'm sorry PK, but the moon landings were all fake.

It is impossible for humans to travel through the Van Allen radiation belt and live, or at least we haven't come up with a way to shield ourselves up to now (2019). The live broadcast from 238,900 miles, and making it through said radiation belt, in 1969, come on I've watched live streams from professional youtubers with the highest internet speed possible, and the latest and best computers and cameras freeze up or completely go off, so come on.

Look up pictures of the crafts that supposably got them there, bad, sloppy welding jobs and flimsy structures, these were just props, that you saw on a fuzzy 1960s tv screen and no one ever imagined there would be an internet to take a closer look at it.

Brian Niemeier #wingnut #conspiracy #mammon brianniemeier.com

It is equally ironic and predictable that Liberal democracy would end in an orgy of tyranny to make a decadent French nobleman balk. Democracy thought to solve the problem of tyranny by letting the people replace their leaders, but our leaders circumvented that check by replacing the people.

It's no coincidence that nobody pays more lip service to democracy than the Leftist Death Cult. Having just completed a century-long project designed to insulate them from the consequences of their depredations, the Left are feeling their oats and accordingly embarking upon a totalitarian spree once reserved for Soviet puppet states.

After spending the past few decades constantly testing boundaries like sociopathic toddlers, the Death Cultists are now confident that they will face no serious pushback against their insane edicts and will suffer no punishments for their enormities.

You can tell because they're not even bothering to hide the election tampering, treason, and human sacrifice anymore. The Epstein debacle was the final proof. You had an international scumbag who furnished child sex slaves to other international scumbags and lived like a pharaoh until he slipped up one time too many. Then his former benefactors pushed a button on him with matching sloppiness.

Time was, the ruling party would put some effort into coming up with a cock and bull story to mollify the NPCs. Now, instead of lone gunmen and magic bullets, we get tacit admissions that foul play is afoot but zero follow up action from law enforcement. That's why the Cult didn't offer up the usual ablative meat shields over the coup against Trump. No need to sacrifice scapegoats when there are zero consequences for ignoring the cries for justice.

This casual wickedness has even trickled down from the thrones in Washington to the Cult's Hollywood priesthood. In just two years, Kevin Spacey has gone from facing jail time for alleged shenanigans with an underage boy to flaunting his case's dismissal in a bizarre Christmas video.

More than bizarre, Spacey's message took on a sinister new subtext when one of his accusers died in an apparent suicide the day after it was posted.

Is it a coincidence that Spacey's accuser died one day after the disgraced star invited viewers to kill detractors with kindness? Possibly, but if so, it's the most uncanny example of prophetic TV since Quantum Leap called the 96 Super Bowl.

Now consider that Spacey has close ties to the Clintons, including at least one trip with Bill aboard Epstein's Lolita Express.

It's hard not to see one epic humiliation ritual behind the whole sordid affair. And the meaning of that ritual is clear: "We're in charge. Our control is total. We can do anything we want, and we can lie, cheat, and kill with zero repercussions, so think twice before getting in our way."

Our rulers have moved beyond simple corruption and into the chilling realm of supervillainy. Voting won't stop them any more than it would stop Lex Luthor or Keyeser Söze. Democracy is based on negotiation, and there's no negotiating with people who are in a position to dictate terms.

It's worth remembering, though, that the ruling classes of old adopted noblesse oblige out of enlightened self-interest as much as Christian charity. Our current rulers have neither Christian virtue nor the practical sense to give the mob a few token concessions. If history is any guide, they may learn to their sorrow that their predecessors practiced a degree of restraint for their own protection.

For a glimpse at a future conflict against an aloof, tyrannical state, check out my military thriller series Combat Frame XSeed.

SomeTurdInTheWind #sexist reddit.com

Article: "Fraternity brothers rape 300% more than other men." But remember, it is lonely virgins in their caves who are a threat to women, not the Chad who rapes her and beats her up

Toxic incels can telepathically r women with ease

Volcel if you haven't tried telepathically raping girls

Back in uni I remember seeing frat Chads do all kinds of ridiculous things like slapping girls on the ass right in front of their beta bfs and hearing them say things that would have some of us utterly shocked. Women to them are nothing more than fuck puppets and they love it.

"and they love it."

That is the part that pisses me the fuck off. Billy Beta has to obey the rules and never stare at a woman for longer than 10 seconds, but Chad can literally rape girls and get away with it

People do NOT hate misogyny nor sexism nor misbehavior against women. They hate unattractive men.

The University of Missouri considers banning women from fraternity parties to prevent them from being raped.

The popular jocks are so dangerous that we need to separate them from women to avoid rapes. But remember: it is ugly guys who don't even talk to women who are a threat to women's safety.

Also: the women immediately dismissed the idea. Huh? Didn't they want to be separated from rapists?

Betsy Ross #conspiracy thebetsyrossconservative.blogspot.com

The Main Stream Media is having a field day with this supposed "White Supremacist" yet the Cabal seems to have missed one key topic in the "narrative"...not one word about "Jews" in his 74 page manifesto and not one swastika on his weapons. Very odd indeed.

The manifesto can be read here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5770516-The-Great-Replacement-New-Zealand-Shooter.html (sorry, link has been 404'd, working to find another one)

Nothing about Jews, but the shooter is sure to say "“Remember, lads, subscribe to PewDiePie,” before he starts his massacre. Odd? Well, maybe not so odd, depending on who put this guy up to this, considering PewDiePie is a Conservative Christian "Extremist" with the LARGEST FOLLOWING ON YOUTUBE. Seems perfect, if you're trying to frame a particular group of people. (This one reminds me of Benghazi, when they blame the attack on our embassy on a Youtube video.)
Read More Here:
http://fortune.com/2019/03/15/pewdie-response-new-zealand-mosque-attack/

According to his "manifesto," the one person who ultimately inspired him to commit such violence is none other than Candace Owens. Of course, he makes it a point to say that some of her ideas are far too extreme for his tastes. "Far too extreme" for someone that shoots approximately 100 people and writes a 74 page manifesto? Do they expect us to believe this?

Another weird "co-incidence":
Linwood, Christchurch was location of shooting.
Lin Wood is Covington lawyer suing CNN for $250million

The shooter chose to post on 8chan, alerting everyone to his shooting spree minutes before he began. Yes, the very same board where Qanon posts. Another "co-coincidence"?

And...we're still waiting to find out who this guy is, published in New Zealand media in connection to the shooting, but not the suspect arraigned in court.

Link here: https://www.fbcnews.com.fj/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/NZ-Mosque-shooter-960x540.jpg

And then there's this post from Reddit:

shooter was a personal trailer for 2 years after school. Leaves 2011 to "travel overseas".... 7 year gap who knows where he is..... Posts from the facebook of a Hotel in Islamabad with a picture Says how amazing and wonderful this muslim country is and the people Hotel owned by Shia muslims connected to Nizari people... a little over 6 months later appears in christchurch a small NZ town of a little over 300k people a small town that has had multiple White kiwis become jihadis, travel to yemen and get killed by US drones https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-04/preacher-denies-australian-killed-in-yemen-was-radicalised-in-nz/5500604 the same small town another kiwi teen was radicalized into a Jihadi and planned a mass killing before being arrested https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/101480988/kiwi-teenager-radicalised-online-planned-mass-killing-in-christchurch-for-allah the same small town that a large mossad operation had been operating in for who knows how many years https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/8649223/Mossad-spy-ring-unearthed-because-of-Christchurch-earthquake.html then this guy goes into mosque and shoots up a bunch of Sunni the SAME DAY the high ranking pakistani intelligence operative working in Islamabad in the region the shooter visited last year is SUICIDED https://www.news18.com/news/world/former-pakistan-intel-operative-found-dead-under-mysterious-circumstances-in-islamabad-2067671.html

Well, my final word is this shooting was a wet dream for American media. It strikes me as very odd that the shooter has so much anger over what has happened in other countries, yet although he traveled Europe and Pakistan, he decided to shoot up a Mosque at "CHRISTchurch"

Ides of March: Satanists (globalists) celebrate by bringing "blood to the alter", what better place to do this than at "Christ Church"?

Some MRAs #sexist reddit.com

Re: Boys Often Don’t Recognize When They’ve Been Sexually Assaulted

(feministsonredditare)

" I want to be clear: Girls bear the brunt — both physically and psychologically — of sexual harassment, assault, and rape, but they’re not its exclusive targets. "

Lol at that fucking disclaimer. Why are americans so obsessed with hating men and worshipping feminism? Jesus.

(DJ-Roukan)
This is the true definition of "Toxic Masculinity"...how society shames us into silence, ignores our issues.

When Shepard Bliss coined the term well back in the 90s Iron John moment, this is the sort of thing he talked about, the silence, shame, frustration that caused men to act out for both their lack of understanding, and lack of help for them.

The example today is the overwhelming number of boys raised in the single parent home shooting up schools. We create the crisis, blame men when they explode.

To answer your question, the feminist hijacking that term, turning it against men as they have with so many lies and misrepresentations, so much revisionism, is the reason you are seeking.

(PutridMeatPuppet)
Because upsetting women means you don’t get laid. And too many Americans still give a fuck about getting a piece of ass from an entitled land whale.

(DevilishRogue)
The unpalatable truth is that the vast majority of low-level sexual assault, from brushing up against someone to pinching their bottom, is largely harmless regardless of the sex of the perpetrator or the victim. Whilst men and women deserve the same rights and freedom to engage in day to day life without having their physical integrity infringed upon the consequences are such that it is a weaponized claim as per the Mark Pearson case. As such the only way to ever get anywhere close to achieving equal rights on this issue, let alone anything remotely resembling justice, is to reduce the punishment to the point that courts feel it is something they can do to women who assault men.

(elebrin)
Young men are taught that anything can happen to you at any time, and you need to be prepared to defend yourself against it. The world is trying to chew you up then kill you. They aren't sensitive to things like abuse because I think that is the default that they live with.

Hell, the way boys play is indicative of this. Young boys tease each other and roughhouse endlessly. If you can't take it and learn to dish it back, if you can't learn the other boy's limits of what is OK and what is hurtful while slowly increasing your tolerance of what you can take, then you are just going to have a rough time and never really fit in. In some ways I think that is a good thing, it makes us tough. On the other hand, when an adult is taking sexual advantage of a young boy, that sort of default attitude is going to be working against them getting what they need because that isn't something you can or want to just learn to deal with and they can't really handle it on their own.

Analyst #racist stormfront.org

Re: Sweden expects 400000 asylum seekers in 5 years

Myself being a Nordic, I can only feel ashamed that my racial type is associated with the sick Swedish nation.

One has to wonder if the Lappish and Uralic influences have totally spoiled the Swedish gene pool to the point that nowadays the Swedish nation is largely made up of infinitely naive, mentally retarded and thoroughly brainwashed cultural Marxist mongrelized automatons.

The capacity to think independently is clearly of far greater survival value than beauty, law-abidingness, empathy, industriousness and other characteristics Swedes are known for.

Pixie and LC #fundie youtube.com

(=Video title "Is it possible Near death experiences are demonic deceptions, designed to discredit what the Bible?"=)

Pixi: Yes this is something I have come to realise, that the enemy can indeed give a false nde to an unsaved person. Because some people claim to see an 'Angel' that tells them things that I know for a fact a true Angel of God would never say. Telling them it's ok to be a practicing homosexual indulging in sodomy for example.. It's actually terrifying when you think about it.. Because these poor people believe it. I don't understand why God allows the fallen ones to do this.. I've been praying he stops them. Remember, Satan has no creative powers of his own and has a sloppy counterfeit for everything God does.?

L C: Pixi can u give me the link??

Pixi: @L C Hello. It wasn't in a video that particular thing, it was in a book about ndes and obes from gay and lesbian people. I stopped reading it after the part when a man said his 'angel' told him hell didn't exist and that God made gay people and was happy he was gay.?

L C: Pixi then can u give me the book *laughing emoji

Pixi: @L C I had to go do a little research as I couldn't recall the name, but it's "Crossing over and coming home" by Liz Dale. But remember, it's largely a deception.?

L C: Pixi don’t worry i will read it with caution thx anyway *smiley emoji*

Guilty of being MIKE #fundie forum.myspace.com

Why liberals are dumbasses

Im trying to quote the best I can from Michael Savage.

Liberalism consist of comunism, fascism and a pinch of nazism

Most liberals confuse the word "liberal" with liberation, freedom, being left alone, not being told that to do. But when you look at it...who are the ones telling people what to do? The liberals. They complain about everything, Tell people they cant smoke, express there religion, say that they want, do what they want, etc etc.

Think to yourself, whos the reall liberal?

Nejibana- and Jflitsover #fundie reddit.com

(Nejibana-)
Monsters University Giant Blackpill

Mike Wazowski tried harder and wanted to become a scarer more than anyone in that film, but no matter how hard he tried he just wasn’t scary. No matter how hard he tried he couldn’t change who he was and would never be scary like Sullivan (Chad). Even the main antagonist of the biggest frat house was called Johnny “The Jaw” Worthington.

(Nejibana-)
There are some flaws in this Blackpill as Mike does get a girlfriend in Monsters Inc but would this happen in real life? Would the human equivalent of Mike Wazowski ever get a girlfriend?

(Jflitsover)
He’d be a prime beta bux at 26

Uncensored2008 #fundie usmessageboard.com


democrats are the party of rape.

They want to put frat boys in prison for consensual sex with a drunk girl, but when it comes to violent, forced rape, the democrats are full on proponent. Just check out the threads on the Muslim rape jihad and you'll see all the forum leftists defending rape tooth and claw.

democrats are promoters of violent, forcible rape.


In the 2012 Todd Akin spoke of "real rape." The democrats savaged him for it. Now democrats are the party of rape, so it's not surprising.

Akin was right of course. What the left calls "rape" involves generally young people who drink too much or use drugs and end up having sex. If the girl regrets the sex then the boy is put in prison and called a "rapist." The left has created a climate of fear in what is essentially a Victorian era attack on normal sexual activity,

But rape, real rape, is a violent act. It's more about power and domination than it is about sex. And of course the left, the democrats, are major apologists and supporters of violent, forcible rape. Muslims are victimizing women all across Europe, but the democrats demand we be culturally sensitive and not complain.

The left is at war against women, and rape is just a political toy for them. If it can be used to create fear and oppression on American campuses, then the faux-rape will be pushed to absurdity. The goal is the neuter American men and create an environment of fear. But real rape is also a tool for the left. Real rape leaves women traumatized and often scarred for life. But the left excuses it as a cultural expression by their Islamist allies.

ssoppy #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Denmark Shooting *crisis* actors and FALSE FLAG

Hi,

People are tards. The news this weekend had crisis actors are false flags written all over it. SUPPOSEDLY there was a BIG shooting, well why has there been ZERO eye witnesses to these events, no interviews, no blkogs, etc.....HMMMMM....guess what we saw in news reports were once again crisis actors and was a flase flag to rally WAR SUPPORT to wage war in the middle east for OIL and resources...

I have seen some stage events that were done very very well.... this bullshit was so clearly staged a retard could tell.....they are getting sloppy....

dfordoom #racist unz.com

We do need to address the issue of white-on-white hatred. Why do white gentile elites hate white people so much? More importantly, why do a majority of white gentiles want to destroy their own civilisation? How to explain the determination of the Swedes, the Germans, the French, to destroy themselves?
In fact there is an explanation. It has nothing whatever to do with race. What we’re seeing is pure class hatred. The hatred of upper-class and middle-class urban whites for working-class and rural whites.

Staffanstorp Municipality #wingnut #racist sputniknews.com

A tiny municipality in southern Sweden has stirred up a hornet's nest with a new commercial proclaiming that it's a safe neighbourhood, where ordinary Swedes can live and prosper.
Staffanstorp Municipality in Skåne County has incurred the enmity of mainstream media with its new commercial.
The film opens with a black and white scene from a dingy city full of graffiti, where some rowdy youngsters are seen harassing a mother and her daughter. The family then proceeds to move to Staffanstorp, where colour returns, and they get a new lease on life.
“Dreaming of improvement and striving for a better life is nothing but a sign of health”, the narrator says. “There are municipalities where security, elderly care, schools, and businesses really work. Where the inhabitants are proud of their municipality”, the narrator continues, adding “We welcome you with all our heart”.
The ad ends end with a slogan: “Staffanstorp, as the rest of Sweden should be”.
Staffanstorp's ad coupled with the municipality's previous combative stance against mass immigration has sparked polarising reactions. Representatives of Sweden's mainstream press, which is mostly liberal, spared no accusations.
Moa Berglöf, former speech-writer for the Moderates' former party leader Fredrik Reinfeldt and now an opinion writer for the newspaper Sydsvenskan, linked the film to a recent outbreak of violence in Malmö, when an immigrant teenager was shot, and called it “the most cruel thing” she has seen in a long time.
“So while Malmö is in mourning, the Municipality of Staffanstorp is looking to put up a commercial that ... I don't even know. This is the most cruel thing move I have seen in a long time”, Berglöf tweeted.
​Last week, Berglöf attacked Staffanstorp in an opinion piece, calling the municipality “blue-brown”, blue being the colour of the Moderate party which calls the shots there, and brown referring to the brown shirts of Nazi Germany.
The Nazi trope was utilised by her fellow journalists as well.
“Genuine domestic art ... blond und boden”, Dagens Nyheter's political editor Per Svensson tweeted, referencing concepts that were popular in Nazi Germany, such as “blood and soil”.
​Furthermore, many found the fact that all the actors representing Staffanstorp staff were white disappointing, lamenting the perceived lack of diversity. Some even accused the municipality of promoting white flight.
“People read too much. We do not register ethnicity, we do not think about what skin colour people should have when we make advertisements”, the municipality's strong man Christian Sonesson told Expressen.
“What is strange is that a family looking for security can irk opinion journalists to a degree when they pay more attention to the film than real, tragic events that happen”, Sonesson told the news outlet Nyheter Idag.

By contrast, many on the right were excited about the film.
“Fantastically nice commercial for Staffanstorp. Describes the situation of many Swedes and their quest for a safe life in a secure society”, Sweden Democrats MP Björn Söder wrote.
“The thing with the Staffanstorp's movie is that virtually every normal person is likely to find it quite sympathetic, while the establishment becomes hysterical over it. The latter's reactions are a very useful reminder of the different worlds these groups live in”, a user mused.
​Staffanstorp is a town in Skåne County and a central place in the municipality of Staffanstorp. Located between the cities of Lund and Malmö, it has about 15,600 inhabitants.

various incels #sexist reddit.com

(erikthesmasher)
Female college rommate. What should I do?

So I was looking for a roommate online for the next college year. A female has contacted me and wants to share the apartment with me. As I am an incel it would be extremely frustrating for me to live with a female of my age. I have few options and if I refuse her I might be alone in my room the whole year like I was last year. All I did is study and watch porn as it was the time before I found this subreddit (I was going throught the process of becoming a beta provider, I know I was bluepilled thinker) Also one normie guy contacted me but is not very interested and I have little options. The problem is I can not afford to live alone. Normie or female? What will it be? I found myself in an interesting situation. Never had any contact with a female and now I have to live with her? One more thing I dont know the guy or the female as I have no friends. Just found them online. UPDATE- The female is above average looking. That makes it even worse.

(TheTacoBelly)
There are two scenarios here:

The normie roommate will occasionally bring over femoids to fuck

The femoid roommate will have an unending supply of Chads over, fucking her brains out, which you will undoubtedly be able to hear from your room

Best case scenario is with the femoid, after getting railed by Chads maybe one will reject her and she will be so desperate for male attention that she will let you have sloppy seconds.

(xxxdickfaggotsonxxx)
Imagine you were standing in front of a fire (involuntary celibacy) - immediately next to you is a cup of what is clearly petrol (normalfag), and a bucket of what could be either petrol or water (normalfagette). Until you tip that bucket onto the fire you can't be sure what's inside of it, but you have to choose either the cup or the bucket.

Which one do you go for?

(erikthesmasher)
Do you actually think I could get lucky? Im completely subhuman with acne on my face since childhood. All I would get is a female that is disgusted with me but has to live with me because of financial reasons. Others pay way more for rent than me.

(knajjd11)
NO female has sex/relationships with even normie roommates due to possible awkwardness, let alone incel roommates. Trust me, it won’t happen.

(lollipoopex)
god are you stupid.

I tell you how this will work out. You will interpret her not hating you as a chance to get some secks, then she will feel uncomfortable and get you out of your own flat one way or another, then you will be homeless.

Good luck idiot.

James Risdon #fundie lifesitenews.com

JERUSALEM, Israel, July 27, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Orthodox rabbis in the Holy City are reportedly calling out LGBT rights groups for using “aggressive terror” tactics to turn “perverts into heroes” in a letter published by Hebrew media.

The group of more than 200 rabbis wrote the letter in support of Jerusalem Chief Rabbi Aryeh Stern whose comments against LGBT adoption have created a stir.

In the wake of Israel passing a law to prevent gay couples from obtaining children through surrogates, massive protests erupted in Jerusalem Sunday, drawing upwards of 100,000 people.

LGBT activists were decrying the Israeli government’s claim that it would be an “additional burden” on the child to be adopted by a same-sex couple.

Then, Rabbi Stern whipped LGBT groups into frenzy by reportedly stating it is a “fact that kids are entering very strange and unnatural lives of living without a mother and a father”. He also reportedly called acting out as an LGBT person “forbidden”.

In a letter, more than 200 orthodox rabbis backed him up.

Advertisement

“[He] simply voiced the eternal truth of our holy Torah and human normality, which the healthy majority in Israel identifies with,” the rabbis wrote in that letter.

They accused LGBT groups of using “aggressive terror accompanied by non-stop media brainwashing,” in attempts to turn “perverts into heroes.”

That LGBT agenda will not succeed nor will attempts to shut rabbis and sane people up and try to turn them into delusional extremists, the rabbis reportedly wrote.

“Rabbi Stern was protecting the children of Israel, who will be miserable if they aren’t adopted by normal families,” the rabbis claimed.

In some LGBT media, the idea children raised by gay couples would fare any worse was summarily dismissed.

In an article in Pink News, writer Josh Jackman defended the ability of same-sex couples to raise happy, well-adjusted children by pointing to a study that concluded children of same-sex couples are just as happy and healthy as children of straight parents.

There are studies that show either no differences between children raised in same-sex households and those in traditional families with a married mom and dad. Many of those studies have been criticized for methodological sloppiness.

And there’s a lot of evidence in other studies that show a family with a married mother and father remains the best way to raise a child.

In his study, Growing up with gay parents: What is the big deal?, Dr. Richard P. Fitzgibbons surveyed those studies.

Among his findings, Fitzgibbons noted when gay couples bring a child into the world with the help of a surrogate, that boy or girl is more likely to have trouble adjusting by the age of seven than other children.

Advertisement

Another difference the physician highlighted was revealed in a 2013 Canadian study which showed children of gay and lesbian couples are only about 65 per cent as likely to graduate from high school as children of married, traditional couples.

In addition, a 2009 study of women raised by gay or bisexual fathers showed they were less comfortable with closeness and intimacy, less able to trust and depend on others, and experienced more anxiety in relationships compared to women raised by heterosexual parents.

Other studies report rates of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and emotional problems being twice as high among children raised by same-sex parents as among the general population.

“An objective examination of social science research into how families function reveals clearly that children do best when raised by both a mother and a father,” concluded Fitzgibbons.

Prior to becoming Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger summarized what several scientific studies of same-sex couples have since indicated.

“The absence of complementarity in these unions (same sex) creates obstacles in the normal development of children who would be placed in the care of such persons,” wrote Ratzinger, then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. “They would be deprived of the experience of either fatherhood or motherhood.

“Allowing children to be adopted by persons living in such unions would actually mean doing violence to these children, in the sense that the condition of dependency would be used to place them in an environment that is not conducive to their full human development,” he said.

Vaginal Jesus #racist darklyrics.com

23. Jesus Was Nothing But A Jew

He's nothing but a hebe, a penny-pinching scum
He never had a job, another Jewish bum
We'll crucify the hebe, it'll be no fucking loss
We'll nail his hymie ass to the fucking cross

Jesus was nothing but a fucking Jew
If we were in Auschwitz, I'd give him a tattoo
Jesus was nothing but a fucking kike
Let's nail him to the cross with ten-inch spikes

You fucking kike!

Brian Kilmeade #racist salon.com

[On a study done in Finland and Swedan which shows that people who stay married are less likely to suffer from Alzheimer's]

We [Americans] are -- we keep marrying other species and other ethnics and other ...See, the problem is the Swedes have pure genes. Because they marry other Swedes .... Finns marry other Finns, so they have a pure society.

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

Day 11 and still no video of the dead or gravely wounded John Kerry. We were expecting some type of doctored photo to be released for the purpose of quashing the growing Internet rumor of Kerry's assassination, or attempted assassination.

The just-released photo of John Kerry raise even more suspicions!

image

•Why no leg cast for a major bone break (femur)?
•If he is able to speak on the phone, why can't the public hear his voice?
•If he can talk, why hasn't he done a TV or radio interview?
•Why do our sources in Boston still see no enhanced security around the hospital?
•Why no photos of American politicians going to wish him well?
•He looks very healthy in this photo. Why is he even in a hospital?
•Why just this single photo, suddenly released now as questions mount?
•Where is his wife? His two daughters? No grandson? No well-wishers?

This is exactly the type of weird photo we would expect from such a sloppy cover-up. We are now certain that something bad happened to Kerry, and that the perps were Israel's ISIS agents. See our original story, with updated date, below.

*

As of today's date, (June 10, 2015), 11 days have passed since Secretary of State John Kerry "broke his femur bone" while "bike-riding" in France. We here at The Anti-New York Times (Sugar the Cat and myself) do not traffic in unsubstantiated Internet rumors and hearsay. For that reason, we ignored the early stories about Kerry having been shot and gravely injured in an ISIS (i.e. Israel) assassination attempt.

But after thorough daily searches of the Internet, we have yet to find a single post-"bike accident" photo or video clip of John Kerry. Though a broken femur would be a serious injury, it would not prevent him from waving to a camera as he's being carted out of an ambulance into a Boston hospital; or saying a few words from a hospital bed; or being wheel-chaired to the funeral of Vice President Joe Biden's son. Heck, your reporter here recalls his elderly father groggily cracking jokes from his hospital bed the day after he had triple bypass surgery!

There are stories of Kerry recovering in a Boston hospital, but we have seen neither hide nor hair of the chatty Secretary. Attention-seeking politicians like him adore the spotlight. Why can't he give a "thumbs-up" for the cameras? Why hasn't his famous busy-body wife publicly commented on this? Where is the media on this? When Vladimir Putin disappears for an extended bathroom break, the Western Press is rife with conspiracy theories about his "disappearance". Not so in this case. What's going on here?

UPDATE / DAY 11 / JUNE 10, 2015

A reader from Boston maintains:
"I'm living in Boston, and go past Boston Medical Hospital everyday. Haven't seen any diplomatic security around, except on Boylston St."

Now, this is still an hypothesis at this point (though a pretty damn strong one as each day passes), but could it be that "the usual suspects" have had enough of Kerry's chumminess with Iran, pressure on Israel, and pressure on the gangsters of Kiev to stop fighting? This is certainly not to portray FrankenKerry as some sort of heroic American patriot; far from it. But the fact is, in spite of public anti-Russian posturing, Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov maintained a professional working relationship and achieved some degree of positive progress with regard to both Iran and Ukraine. Remember, it was Kerry-Lavrov who diffused the push for the 2013 war on Syria (a back door to a war with Iran).

You see, Kerry is indeed an ultra-liberal dirty-dealing scumbag of the lowest rank. However, he is a pragmatic scumbag. As such, the possibility of nuclear Armageddon was never an idea he was all that crazy about. Yes, liberal scoundrels love their children too!

And it is equally true that the certifiably insane Neo-Con faction of America's ruling PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) and the George Soros Globalist faction both want World War 3, and soon! Kerry's oh-so-conveeeenient "bike accident" and sudden disappearance have catapulted Assistant Secretary of State for European & Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland (Nudelman) Kagan to de-facto headship of the State Department. In a sense, this had already happened before the "bike accident". The reluctant Europeans now know that they are taking orders from neo-con warmonger Nuland, not Kerry.

Kerry and Lavrov sought to pacify the situation in Iran and Eastern Ukraine. Compare that to the relentless warmongering of Israeli agent Victoria "F--k the EU" Nuland (the fiend who helped to PERSONALLY incite the bloody Kiev coup of 2014) and the latest "bike accident" is very good news for the warmongers.

In much the same way that the reasonable and pragmatic Secretary of Offense Chuck Hagel was cast aside and replaced by the blood-thirsty warmonger Asston Carter; Kerry is being squeezed out by the PNAC "We-need-a-new-Pearl-Harbor" psycho Nuland-Kagan.

As crazy as this well-wishing may sound coming from The Anti-New York Times, here it goes: "Mr. Kerry. You are still a scumbag Globalist. Nonetheless, gunshot wounds or "broken leg" - whatever it was - please get better. And get back to work before Vicious Vicky and Ass Carter start World War III!"

THIS IS NOT A GOOD SIGN!

UPDATE

It's official now. The "respectable" media has confirmed that Nutty Nuland is running the Freak Show. Prepare for war!

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

At a campground where we were staying between meetings I picked up a folder advertising the horse racetrack not far down the road.

I was interested in the fact that in order to eat in the Clubhouse overlooking the racetrack you had to dress a certain way. In other words, they had dress standards.

Men had to have on a coat — or jacket and a shirt and tie. No jeans, shorts, etc. The ladies were required to wear a dress or skirt and blouse. At the bottom of the folder it stated that you would not be allowed into the Clubhouse for dining unless you were dressed properly.

I could not help but think of how sloppy many of God's people dress for the church services. I am not talking about sinners coming to church. I am talking about those who claim to be saved who show up dressed like the world.

They come poured into a pair of pants or a short skirt or a dress that they have to keep pulling down. Or a low cut dress or blouse that reveals part of their breast. We should strive to be an example to the lost world.

Sri Oracle #conspiracy abovetopsecret.com

MSNBC Says Homeopathy Doesn't Work

Tell it to the common wart that disappeared from my hand after keeping a slice of fresh GARLIC bandaided over it for 10 days.

Tell it to the fleas that are not on my dog, thanks NOT to canine Advantix, but instead to a pinch of BLACK WALNUT powder sprinkled on his meals.

Tell it to the heat rash between my legs that lasted for weeks, then disappeared within 3 days (of hot sweaty work) with the use of CORN STARCH.

Tell it to the 3rd hot spot on my dog which disappeared after 3 days of spraying colloidal silver. The first two were treated by the vet with antibiotics and cortizone injections and took a week to go away.

Study Says Homeopathic Remedies Don't Work

More like... Study Says if you own stock in Big News Company and Big Pharm, use News Company to denounce anything other than Big Pharm products and stock price will go up.

another bit at MSNBC on the same subject:

Teen Faces Cancer Trial

Apparently... not only are Big News and Big Pharm in cahoots... but Big Brother is demanding that this 16 year old be FORCE FED chemotherapy against his wishes to treat his cancer with an organic diet.

Stay in your air conditioned home... eat petro fertilized food... get well with petro chemical remedies... do as you are told.

Just curious... but for the 10,000 years before there was capitalism and the pharmicutical industry... what type of remedies did people use?

REPORTING FROM THE SANATARIUM,

Sri Oracle

marcla77 #fundie arguewitheveryone.com

The only reason that any fetus is ever aborted is because of a woman. A woman who is too lazy and too dumb to put on a raincoat when it’s raining men.

Let me put it this way. If the police find a meth lab in your house, guess who goes to prison. If Chevron finds oil under your house, guess who gets a big fat retirement check. If someone finds a delicious turkey in your oven, guess who gets the praise for it.

That’s right it’s you. You go to prison, you get the check, you get a big honey glazed pat on the back. However, if it’s a woman’s house and a woman’s oven and someone finds a big unwanted bun in it, guess whose fault it is. Somehow in the world of women and their crappy magic math, it’s 50% your fault.

Fuck that.

Women are to blame for every unwanted baby and every abortion in the world for the same reason that everyone laughs at you when you’re hung over. Because you knew exactly what would happen you dumb shit, and you did it anyway. Thinking any differently is like hosting a frat kegger and then being surprised when your house is fucking destroyed.

adam79 #racist stormfront.org

(whites are superior serial killers!! Hooray for us?)

The reason why you see so many white serial killers and not nearly as many black serial killers is simply because whites are,in my opinion at least, far more intelligent than blacks. Serial murder requires a great deal of work, great patience, great caution & self control. Most of their time is spent 'hunting' or 'preying' on their victims, the abduction or killing itself is actually quite quick by comparison.You actually have to be a very intelligent, sly, crafty person to get away with murder for so long. It is not an easy thing. Blacks however are usually not like this. They are more instinctive, emotional & wild thus their crimes tend to be more random & sloppy, thus they get caught very quickly. Whites however are smart, careful, cover their tracks, dont leave evidence etc. Now how many blacks are like this?

It's not a morality issue either cause trust me, if blacks were as smart as whites & could do it like they do, you would see far more blacks as serial killers than whites, they just cant get away with it like whites.They just get caught too early.

But there are of course a few serial killers that have been black and since killing 3 qualifies as a 'serial' murderer if one looks into it there are actually quite a few blacks who are serial killers. It's just that they dont get into the spotlight cause the media usually only pays great attention to the 'big cuhunas' of serial killings like Ted Bundy, John Gacy & Jeffery Dahmer. It's like you have to kill at least 10+ in order to get media attention.{lol}

Visit a prison though,and you will see many sick & twisted killer blacks...that's where the truth lies,in the jails. They are caged up like the beasts they are.

Rudra #fundie paklinks.com

I used to be ok with gays being in the world ... till a gay felt me up in a suburban train .... I beat the **** out of him .... he had to be hospitalised for a broken skull .. I mean if you are not used to having your bottom pinched then you wont like it . Anyways that made me more sensitive to the plight of women who get subjected to eve teasing. SO i guess you learn from everything ..

royko22 #racist youtube.com

[This is a comment to the music video of the ABBA tribute band A-Teens version of Dancing Queen]

So the low-life Swedes have nothing to offer the world other than raw materials for Adolf Hitler's war machine -- a sellout of their Norwijian brothers and sisters -- and cheap ABBA and A-teens imitations of American pop culture?

No wonder Sweden is dying under its Muslim onslaught.

We Americans will save our British friends, but we won't lift a finger to save the Swedes.

Tom Brock #fundie oneby1.org

I have struggled with homosexual temptation most of my life. By the grace of God I have always been celibate but the struggle for me has been intense. Sadly, the battle was also with my own denomination. In my 22 years as a pastor in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America I spoke at church conventions for the Biblical standard of celibacy for those with same-sex attraction. Sadly, in 2009 the ELCA adopted a more liberal view and began ordaining practicing homosexuals. I have left the ELCA but I continue in my television ministry to uphold the truth that homosexual behavior is sin, and the fact that I struggle with this temptation does not give me license to practice the behavior.

This summer I testified before a hearing at the convention of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) as they debated whether to change the definition of marriage to include homosexual couples. I explained that I am a person who struggles with same-sex attraction but the last thing I want to see is the Church endorse a behavior that hurts people in this life and which excludes them from the Kingdom in the next (I Corinthian 6:9-11).

I stated: "Is it not arrogant to think that we are somehow more enlightened than all the Christians who came before us?" I believe it is safest to interpret Scripture the way Christians have understood it for 2,000 years and the solid testimony of church history is against homosexual behavior. The Biblical interpretation that has led some denominations astray – notably the ELCA, Presbyterian Church USA, the Episcopal Church in America, and the United Church of Christ – maintains that the Bible does not condemn homosexual behavior per se, but only promiscuous homosexual behavior. As much as part of me – my flesh – would like to believe I can legitimately engage in homosexual behavior, the Bible remains a permanent obstacle. An objective reading of Leviticus 18:22, 20:13, Deuteronomy 22:5, Romans 1:26-27, I Corinthians 6:9-11, I Timothy 1:8-10, Jude 6,7 makes clear that the Bible's condemnation of homosexual behavior is a blanket one. There is never the added caveat: But it is okay if you love each other.

At the Presbyterian convention, one pastor testified that the denomination should allow her to marry lesbians in her congregation because "If I don't I will hurt them." I responded, "No, to encourage them to engage in a behavior which will rob them of salvation, that is what will hurt them."

I was interviewed on Minneapolis radio about my struggle and the interviewer asked, "Pastor Brock, why don't you just go with this orientation as who you are." I responded, "I'm glad I didn't. I'd be dead. Many men my age who went into this lifestyle are dead." Some liberal Lutheran bishops I know believe they are being loving by affirming homosexual behavior. The truth is they are hurting people. As one old Lutheran pastor said, "They are nicing people right into hell." I can't tell you how grievous it was for me with my struggle to hear bishops endorse something that I knew was evil.

So what does one do if one suffers from same-sex attraction? I believe the answer is: fight. Nowhere are we told the Christian life will be easy. I once heard someone say "But God would never ask you to deny something so central to your make-up as homosexuality." I thought, "Why not?" If we believe in the doctrine of original sin – that we are all born sinners because of Adam's fall (Romans 5) – then indeed every Christian is called to battle the sin that is so central to our make-up. One often hears "But I didn't choose this." I can relate. I never consciously asked to have these temptations. But most alcoholics do not wake up one morning and say "I think I'll have a drinking problem." Kleptomaniacs do not say "I think I'll have a problem with shoplifting." We may not choose our temptations in life, but we do choose what we do with our temptations. To be tempted is not sin. Jesus was tempted in Matthew 4. What we do with temptation shows whether we are endeavoring to follow Christ. And, praise God, even if we do fall under temptation, there is forgiveness when we repent and turn to Christ.

What will help people who struggle with same-sex attraction? Of course, regular prayer, Bible reading and being in a good church, a church that has not compromised on this issue. But for most people struggling with same-sex attraction, the crucial key is accountability. I have been part of a Christian support group for those who struggle with same-sex attraction. If you Google "Exodus International" you will most likely find a group in your area where you can join other Christians who have this struggle. Also very important for me are the weekly phone calls I make to my accountability partner who helps keep me on the straight and narrow.

Lastly, where does homosexuality come from? Is it nature (in the genes) or nurture (in one's upbringing)? I lean toward the latter but ultimately it does not matter. Wherever it comes from, we are called upon to follow Christ and say "no" to it. As our Lord Himself stated: "If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me" (Luke 9:23).

fred phelps #fundie godhatessweden.com

Fags have a 3 point agenda: 1) decriminalize sodomy, 2) add fags to the protected classes as victims like blacks, and 3) criminalize Gospel preaching against fags. Sweden's doom is now irreversible!

With the arrest of Ake Green, Swedes have allowed the filthy sodomite agenda to be completely fulfilled. See our monument to Pastor Green here. Just because Green's conviction has been overturned, don't think that makes things right! The fact that the vast majority of the Swedish population either sat by silently while this rape of justice took place, or actually applauded it, solidifies the idea that Sweden is a land of the damned.

Just because Green preaches the doctrine of devils that "God loves everyone" doesn't make it right for Sweden to arrest him for also preaching that fags are an abomination (Lev. 18:22).

With this act, as well as the vitriolic response given to this preaching, Sweden has drawn to it the wrath and mocking of God!

Segmentum #fundie scienceblogs.com

Have you noticed that there are no attractive people here? I noticed that a lot, PZ's visit to creation museum with hundreds of students, no attractive people, and sloppily dressed too with weird sloppy haircuts.

Why is that, why is it when I look at young christians I see mostly attractive people well dressed with well maintained haircuts and when I look at young atheists I see the exact opposite? What's going on?

Westboro Baptist Church #fundie godhatesfags.com

WBC TO PICKET SARA EVANS & BLAKE SHELTON
AT KICKER COUNTRY STAMPEDE, MANHATTAN, KS ON SATURDAY, JUNE 27 FROM 6:45 – 7:30 PM

Sara Evans is a Proverbs 7 woman (READ IT), with modest talent. She stands in the shoes of the proud, rebellious entertainment industry. She divorced her husband in a very public, nasty scene, and then married another man who was divorced from HIS wife. If that was not bad enough, these two proud perverts dragged their babes into the mess, passing them through the fire, teaching them that God is a liar and that Christ’s plain words mean NOTHING! The seven collective babes (really babes who know NOTHING about God and never will at the hands of their hateful parents) were required to give their parents away.

So it is no surprise that this woman is sharing the program with our next picket target, Blake Shelton. This prating Oklahoma pervert has also dealt treacherously with his wife, and shamefully divorced her so he could sniff after and commit adultery with a simple slut that required said divorce, like as if that divorce cleaned up that stinky mess!! Listen up you country-singing perverts, the Lord Jesus Christ said:
“Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever
marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery.” Luke 16:18.

Upon a certain season, Westboro Baptist Church advised Mr. Blake Shelton of these never changing doctrines and commandments of the Lord his God, and Mr. Shelton publically expressed his despite for God’s commandments. Watch that shameful display here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfHY4tLf2Mk.

After you take that in, you can be refreshed with these beautiful parodies by WBC, turning Blake Shelton’s sloppy agape notions into excellent songs that glorify God.
“Boys Round Here”:
https://db.tt/q0hbMnr7
Also, don’t miss this beauty, taking “My Eyes” and VOILA... “Your Eyes...These Signs”
http://bit.ly/1q5JK9S.

One final note for your entertainment industry friends, of EVERY genre:
You have NOTHING except what God Almighty loaned you! You have a DUTY to use it all to serve and glorify God. You should make it your life goal to be a living example of holiness to God! On YOUR watch, this nation has bowed down to the fags, and same-sex marriage is the order of the day! The Lord is coming, WOE, WOE, WOE to you, one and all!!

Chick Publications #fundie chick.com

A recent commotion at University of California, Davis, led to a walk-out by pro-Israel students with other students shouting “Allahu Akbar” as they left. The event occurred during a meeting of the Student Government Council who was voting on a Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) resolution.

BDS is a world-wide, pro-Palestinian (thus: anti-Israel) movement seeking to damage the Israeli economy. It has chapters on campuses to pressure the university trust funds to boycott Israeli businesses and investments.

After the walkout, the Student Council voted 8 to 2 in favor of the resolution to boycott and divest, much to the satisfaction of the pro-Hamas group Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) who had championed the vote. Jewish leaders and their friends on campus knew the situation was serious when a couple of swastikas were painted on a Jewish frat house a few days later.

UC Davis leaders said that the student resolution does not affect their investment strategies which are set by the UC Regents. Nevertheless, this is only one example of a global effort to discredit Israel’s right to exist. BDS goals are the return of all Palestinian lands to Arab control and the dismantling of the wall that Israel has built to keep out suicide bombers. Of course, if done, Israel would simply cease to exist. This is just one small example of the rising tide of anti-Israel sentiment worldwide. Some of the campaign is the result of general Western hatred for the Jews fostered by Roman Catholicism’s “Replacement Theology.” For centuries, Rome has claimed that the “people of God” is now the “church” and God is done with Israel because they rejected their Messiah.

The Holy Land is just the repository of historical relics to be venerated by the “faithful,” and the Zionists should go off somewhere like Argentina to build their nation and leave the rest of the world in peace. This “anti-Semitism” has plagued the Jews for centuries culminating in Hitler’s attempt to solve the “Jewish problem.”

This latent anti-Israel sentiment in the Western World is only present in political and economic pressure on Israel, but a far more sinister dragon is breathing real fire on the neck of this sturdy little country. “Militant” Islam has vowed to eliminate both Israel (little Satan) and the “Great Satan,” America.

There are hundreds of pro-Islam groups like BDS dedicated to this larger cause. The rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq is just the latest expression of the Qur’an-inspired violence that awaits all non-Muslim peoples if Islamists have their way.

So, what should the Bible believer do as we watch the “heathen rage?” World leaders are mostly focused on appeasement or military defeat. But the real solution is elsewhere, largely ignored by those leaders. Bible readers know that this is a cosmic spiritual war. Most of the governments of this world are “secular,” opting out of taking sides on spiritual issues. This leaves them defenseless against nations or movements that are fanatical about a spiritual mission.

Islam’s mission is to rule the world for Allah. Even “moderate” Muslims are committed by default to this mission, since they know of no other option.

As soul winners, that is where we come in. We have a superior spiritual option. We just need to get it out there where they can see it. Saturation with no-nonsense gospel tracts can help lay the foundation for the revival that we need to get Islam’s (and everyone else’s) attention.

Beheadings by ISIS are mild compared to the brutal tactics used by Hitler and Genghis Kan. Unless we get busy and promote revival, our time will be short before our freedom to do it will be squelched.

Judgybitch #sexist #psycho femoid.com

The walk of shame is a right of passage, not rape
Poor judgement — moi? Ce n’est pas possible!
Coyote ugly. It’s a phrase men use to describe the experience of waking up, hungover as shit, in bed next to a girl so ugly you’d rather chew your arm off than have her stir. Yep, another night of too many shooters and very poor judgement. Well played, tequila. I’m willing to bet that every single varsity athlete or high status (medicine, engineering, computer science) male on any given college campus has had the experience. Why? Because they get hunted. All the time. By women. You see these guys staggering bleary-eyed into the dorm rooms the next morning, bro-punching their friends and saying “Dude, how could you let me do that?”

The walk of shame. A right of passage. One that men seem to relish, enjoy and get over pretty damn quickly. Yeah, you fucked an ugly chick. Or a fat chick. Whatever. You drank too much, lost all your reason and tumbled into bed with someone you wouldn’t normally touch with a ten yard pole. Ho hum. Where we going tonight, bros?

Women, on the other hand, are completely fucked in the head in this exact same situation. They get dressed up in their best whore clothes, head out to a frat party, drink their faces off, end up in bed with some guy they wouldn’t normally touch with a ten yard pole, wake up the next morning feeling like a total slutbag and then it happens. Someone must be to blame for this. I can’t possibly have gotten shitfaced and exercised some really poor judgement. Moi? Ce n’est pas possible! I am an innocent blushing virgin with impeccable moral standards. Why, only whores get smashed and fuck random guys in a frat house, and I am not a whore so JESUS MOTHER OF GOD I WAS RAPED!

Bitch, please. You weren’t raped. You were trashed. Why is it that men are held responsible for their actions no matter what their state of inebriation, but women get a pass. It doesn’t matter if you were drunk, stripped naked, straddled the guy in your best cowgirl and fucked like a banshee. You were drunk. You can’t consent. You were raped.

Dude might have been just as pissed up as you, but he can’t cry rape because rationality. Only men are rational creatures? Really? Bull. Shit.

There are women so delusional they actually think we live in a “rape culture”. What the fuck?

No, we don’t live in a rape culture. We live in a Don’t You Bitches Have Any Friends culture. Me and the Princess have our fair share of experience dancing like madwomen in our lingerie in night clubs filled with horny men starting looking like the cast of Ocean’s Twelve after that last appletini. Many nights ended with crazy slobbery make-out sessions with the DUDE WHO LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE BRAD PITT.

Here’s the thing. We protected each other. Not from Brad Pitt. From our own BAD JUDGEMENT. Rape culture holds men, and only men, responsible for what women do. And thanks, but I prefer to be responsible for my own fucking behaviour. And when I’m about to do something really stupid, that I will regret the next morning, I rely on my friends to save me FROM MYSELF.

So go ahead. Wear those fishnets and hoochie shorts. You look fucking hot! Play beer pong! Strip for that guy. Go ahead and fuck him. Make all those decisions BUT UNDERSTAND THEY ARE YOUR DECISIONS. You don’t get to wake up the next day feeling like a whore and ruin a man’s life because YOU ARE A SLUT. Women–and men–who really were violently brutalized by strangers totally against their will aren’t helped by your idea of a rape culture. In fact the rape culture YOU created makes it worse for them by equating a truly violent and awful crime with bad decisions made while drunk.

So embrace your slut. Or trust your friends when they tell you it’s time to say nighty-night to Brad. Or you know, shut the fuck up. . Take your pick.

Lots of love,

JB

idoartforfun144 #sexist #crackpot reddit.com

Do Stacys assert their dominance when another Stacy comes along?

I was, in short, bullied at work by a Stacy. That Stacy was the prettiest, best-dressed girl who goes to the best college in my state...until today.

Yesterday we got a new girl. Well, technically she started working back in October, but she's a full time student so her hours are miniscule(per her request). Yester was the first time the two crossed paths.

Physically speaking, Stacy is the better looking one, but New Girl has the 'I don't know Im beautiful ' air about her. She wore no makeup, had her long hair tied back in a low ponytail, super quiet, no gossip, no drama, wore rubber gloves so she could do dirty work even with manicure nails. Aka, in total 'productive employee' mode. We all made acquaintance. She was quiet, chill, and an anime fangirl. She's studying for her Master's degree at the best tech university in our city. She's also a party-goer. She mentioned how she decided to leave her New Year's party early at 1AM so she could get enough sleep for work the next day(yesterday), and show us pics. She seemed social outside of work and got tons of friends.

The next day, Stacy came to work in trendy Holister cloths(she also works at Holister) and her long wavy hair down even though it could easily get caught in sauces during catering. She's not even wearing our work uniform. I couldn't believe the coincidence. Like, it's one of those moments when you read it in a YA novel and be like "ha! This cliche would never happen in real life", but then it happened in real life.

I'm not making this up. I don't think anyone is as aware of this as me(I'm so pink-pilled bc I've been browsing this subreddit during work for the past 2 weeks), but I swear I'm not reaching here. Though in a way it makes sense bc Stacy is 19 and still got that High school mentality. New Girl is 24, got a corporate internship, grad school, AND this. She's blissfully oblivious and probably doesn't give a shit anyway.

DAGAIZM #quack deviantart.com

I think all that idea of vaccination for flu is an invasion on humans!
If already do it,why they didn't think about attacking the main part of the virus imediately?

We have natural plants that take care very effectively off eny tipe of flu every year for milions of years!!!
Have You ever heared of GARLIC and SAGE,THYMUS,ONION,GINGER and HONEY?
Try these things and You will never even think of going to get Yourself pinched with someone elses virus!!!,cause that what it is - vaccination is injecting bit of the sickness in to Your sisteme and hoping that the body will be able to cope with it,but if not,than You just get extra sick!
I'm angry with the people,who are to lazy to carry a coat with them to not get cold,or they are to ashamed to eat row garlic,cause of the smell, to bussy to make an infusion /herbal tea from sage with thyme and mint or ginger, sweeten with honey which is ANTYSEPTIC!
They just go get a shot with sickness in it and go to them work to spread it around!!!

I didn't vaccinate my children at all for any of those sicnesses,that most of them are still alive only thanks to this vaccinations,kept alive artifitially in laboratories!

One more thing is that natural remedies are repressed by doctors for centuries! Bussines is bussines! If the people heal them selfs with garlic and sage than the doctors won't make any money on that!!! What You think,why there was the whole "whitch hunt"?! - That was the begining of medicinal industry! That instead of healing people,make sure,they will come back for more,so the income of the doctors will be asecured life long! Them life,not Yours,Yours dus not matter to them!

Dreams of Dunamis #fundie dreamsofdunamis.wordpress.com

[How Witches and Satanists Celebrate Christmas]

Some witches and satanists start their actual celebrations on December 21st, while others begin on December 22ond. They have eight nights a year that call for mandatory human sacrifice, and this night is one of them. On this night, a child sacrifice is called for. In both cases, it is celebrated by having different kinds of sex, and killing a person or an animal and drinking their blood, as a sacrifice to their god. Virgins, or the young children of Christians hold the most value, for satan prizes their deaths the most.

They send out christmas cards to their friends and family, with occult symbols on them, often with holly, mistletoe, wreaths, trees, witches ball ornaments, churches with steeples on them, (the steeple is a phallic symbol of nimrod,) or even robins on them. (The robin is thought to symbolically kills the wren to signal the return of light.)

Satanists also celebrate what they call a “black mass,” at this time. This is one of the “rites of blasphemy” that satanists do. It is essentially a parody of the catholic mass. However, keep in mind that satanists, witches, pagans, and wiccans were doing this mass thousands of years before the catholics started. Constantine took it from the pagans and made it into his catholic or common state religion. Interestingly, this catholic mass does not really differ much from what satanists do during their own masses to satan. They both have chalices filled with blood, (the catholics through transubstantiation,) they both have the flesh of their victim (again, the catholics through transubstantiation ,) both have cloth coverings to cover their altars and robes to wear during the ceremony, both have priests and attendants, both use candles, both have their December 24th mass at midnight, both use the same exact smelling incense, both believe in purgatory (called somerset for satanists,) where they work themselves into their paradise, both use bells, both use holy water and both use a pinch of salt to bless it, both have their book of prayers on their altar, both have chalices that are covered with a cloth, and they both eat and drink of their victim’s flesh and blood. (Why the catholics keep crucifying to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame, I do not know; it is as if they believe that the first time was not enough to remove our sins.) Satanists also recite the Lord’s Prayer in reverse, as an extra rite of blasphemy.

As one satanist puts it: “The 23rd is a very special personal day for satan. The sun enters the sign of the goat which represents satan. The night of December 22nd- the eve of December 23rd is the highest satanic holy night of the year. This is a time for intense celebration and devotion to satan, indulgence, decorating the home, family celebrations and getting together. The night of Dec. 22nd should be spent in dedication to satan.” Satanists know that these pagan gods are actually demons and they celebrate them as such.

Satanists and witches are not afraid to say “merry christmas”, for they know that what they are really saying is “Let us be merry about killing the anointed one again!” (Their anointed one, or christ, is not the same as ours.)

December 24th brings their “high grand climax”, where they call forth demons to have sex with them. They also have more animal and human sacrifices to their god, (Which they usually do between the hours of 12:00 midnight and 3:00am,) and continue on in their parties and revelry.

December 25th, is the culmination of saturnalia, which they mark with many great banquets and feasts, drinking until they are drunk and can drink no more. When they are not drunk, they go from place to place, wassailing and bringing gifts to each other. (These celebrations are very similar to the drunken festival of babylon.) It is all about feeding the will and indulging the self. (That is after all, at least for satanists, the whole of their law.) Some begin this practice four days before the 25th, for that is the official start of the celebration of saturnalia. On the 25th of December, infant sacrifice is encouraged. In the bible, they sacrificed infants to molech on December 25th. Witches and satanists still do this today.

Anon1 #fundie t.co

This piece is more about the Asian experience in America than it is about the frat guys on trial, who are mainly props in the author’s tale of woe. His bitterness is really something to behold. And he’s not alone- check out the responses he got when he posted it on Twitter. Tons of people, mostly Asians, are saying it’s the most profound thing ever, it moved them to tears, etc. I don’t know what portion of the U.S. Asian population holds Kang’s views, but clearly he’s not alone.

He recounts evil deeds that America has done to Asians at various times, but these don’t seem to done lasting damage if the demographic data are to be believed. Asians outperform whites on a variety of social indicators. Upon entering the U.S., Kang himself rose immediately into elite academic institutions and prestigious media gigs. The sense I get, from various comments he makes throughout the piece, is that he just feels fundamentally alienated from American society. He’s more bitter about that than about any specific discrimination he can identify.

And if that’s the case, my question for Kang and his Twitter friends is: What the hell do you actually want us to do? You’ve been admitted here by the millions, you have access to education and careers, you can get citizenship and participate in the political process. This isn’t the Jim Crow South we’re talking about here.

If his bitterness comes from a sense that he can never really fit in to the white majority culture, then it follows that he considers the majority an ipso facto problem, and is going to keep bitching until it’s gone.

various incels #fundie reddit.com

(Medcel)
The blackpill is working, normberts are starting to get it (comments from the r/Tinder post)

image

(not_here_4_points)
Tinder itself is the biggest blackpill experiment there ever was. The current top showerthought of the past year with 105,000 upvotes - "Tinder is the opposite of porn site advertisements. There actually are a ton of hot singles in my area, but none of them are interested in me."

(Thereitiz)
That bit about 2's having tinder date calendars... fuck thats enough reddit for now this isnt healthy

(Relegated_Interest)
Can confirm. I knew a 200 lbs girl who had that many dates. Over 200 matches.

(Lost_soul99)
your daily dose of suicide fuel

(erikthesmasher)
Tinder is like a harem of women for chads. They can fuck girls now easier than ever.

(usingthistoshitpost)
And we have women saying they are FA and lonely.

(foreignincel2)
There was a comment who said how guys how to compete with each other and have the best personality etc and there will always be another guy more funnier than him so its not fair , lol what a horseshit guys dont compete between each other , girls select the most handsome , no matter what you say words will not make you appear more handsome than you are

(TakeOnMe-TakeOnMe)
Respectfully, men do compete. That's what AMOG is. Especially in a group of classic alphas, say your worst jock frat bro fears, half their game is goofing on each other, strutting around and preening while Stacies pretend not to watch but in actuality are watching very closely.
One Stacy's Chad may not be another's, so more girls win. However, if multiple Stacies want the same Chad, women do the same thing.
I am, of course, speaking of a club, party or other social environment, for the most part.
Junior Chads and Stacies do this, too. It starts very young, on the playground or in the halls. At a time when many boys haven't really noticed girls yet, the High T future Chads have and they're already playing the game. Awkward & goofy boys will raz and dare each other to approach girls, and the one(s) with the biggest balls will win succeed in getting junior Stacy's attention.
At that point, attention alone is good enough.
This moves on to hanging at the mall, shops to skatepark, where boys both compete and embolden each other. Alphas rise to the top.
At these early stages, late blooming future incels may not notice cuz they've still got their heads in the comic books and video games. Then, by the time they notice, they're already crucial months or years behind, social circles have formed and they find themselves on the perimeters.
Now I'm sad.

(TallfagAnnihilator)
The creators of tinder should be publicly executed in the most painful fashion possible. I can't think of single thing that has made female hypergamy worse.

(shitposter1000000)
It simply exposed the femoid hypergamy which has always been present. The inventors probably had good intentions for their own camp like the inventors of the nuclear bomb, but they underestimated how big of a paradigm shift it would cause.

(FPSdouglass)
You're right. Tinder is like eBay. We always wanted to buy or sell shit, but now it's just easier. People still act similar to how they did before.

(damnsong)
You can always curse ancient Egyptians for popularizing the creation of makeup.

(Litchii_Thief)
Nah, I forgive them because Pyramids are badass looking.

(LukeVenable)
You can thank aliens for that

(usingthistoshitpost)
Ayy lmao

FaceandHFD incels.co

[Blackpill] Normies don't want incels to have fun


Normies want you to suffer and contribute to society without reproducing like a slave cuck. If you don't, they want you dead because you have no utility for them and waste resources. They feel entitled to your selfless contribution to their society and want to tax the fuck out of productive single men. Normies, just like women, want a big government to provide them with everything and tell them how they are supposed to live.

Some normies are fine with other normies visiting escorts, but they all hate sub5 escortcels more than anything. They hate seeing incels going outside trying to socialise instead of studying/workcelling. They hate incels that go to nightclubs to drink, unless they pay for normie and foids drinks. If you aren't their little jester they also hate you. If they suspect you do drugs you're seen as a weirdo and a loser, meanwhile they have no problem with chad and stacy doing coke and ecstacy at frat parties.

Various Incels #fundie reddit.com

(Big_Iron_PP)
ITT: Braincels in the middle ages

King Chad rode by my village yesterday. Every filthy wench in the town flocked to the road to see him pass. I guess he just has good nobility. JFL.

(Radicum)
Everyone was a manlet in this time period.

(supremejoker15)
Sir may I have some of the cope you are on I would very much like it. Low IQ even if the average was shorter there’s always GigaChads 2ft above the average. OMEGAcoping

(Big_Iron_PP)
The manlet scale just shifted downwards:

HyperChad: 5'9

Average 5'6

Manlet 5'2

(Bojangles_Unchained)
You'd probably have a looksmatch serfwife, at least

(ascended_junglecel)
imagine being the only one in the village who could count his chickens, get sent to Lutheran university: never even see a woman for 8 years during your studies. never get to go carousing in the tavern with Chod and Brod. never get to visit a whorehouse or pinch a lass's bum at harvest festival. never get to rape sand hole on conquest. tfw diddle the new altar boy to sustain yourself

Mack Major #fundie facebook.com

Voodoo - not Christianity - is the number one influence over the African-American community right now. (The same goes for African and Caribbean cultures too.)

Many of today's youth - and adults - are under the direct demonic influence of African voodoo; and they don't even know it.

I'll be talking more about this in my upcoming ebook. Because many are totally ignorant to the greatest spiritual warfare in our generation taking place right in front of them. And they haven't the slightest clue.

Voodoo influences just about all of modern day black culture: including our music, festivals, college frats and sororities, street gangs, the drug culture and our entertainment; especially the rappers and singers.

image

Take the recent photo shoot by this popular rapper in the image above. To the untrained mind this is just some guy posing with a weird dark background. But I've been studying the occult influence within the entertainment industry long enough to know what this photo shoot REALLY represents.

This rapper is letting you know exactly what spiritual influence he's placed himself under; and he's giving honor to the deity he most likely serves the most. He's paying respect to the voodoo god called Eleggua.

And he's not the only one. A lot of your favorite rappers - both male and female - pay homage to various voodoo gods and spirits. When you know what to look for you can easily see it, even in the colors of the beaded bracelets that they quietly wear.

The Church has to get more astute at recognizing the demonic spiritual influences that are over our youth. Many of you reading this are raising children in church: and while your kid sits in church every Sunday, they're really under the dark spiritual influence of these voodoo practicing entertainers.

Some of you are under this influence yourself. And once that door gets opened it's only a matter of time before your child is entertaining demonic spirits in their life.

So you need to make it your business to know what's influencing your child and more importantly how to nullify that influence by covering your household under the blood of Jesus Christ.

Start taking your Christian faith and the power it contains seriously. These are not the days to get caught slipping. And if you find yourself being entertained by demons, you need to clean up your act.

Stop straddling the fence and make an affirmative decision to roll with Christ till the end. The bible makes it clear that you cannot be influenced by Jesus Christ and demonic spirits at the same time!

"You cannot drink from the cup of the Lord and from the cup of demons, too. You cannot eat at the Lord's Table and at the table of demons, too." 1 Corinthians 10:21

Be informed, be faithful, be aware and be educated. That's how you escape the deadly traps of the enemy in this hour.

"So that Satan will not outsmart us. For we are familiar with his evil schemes." 2 Corinthians 2:11

"If the Good News we preach is hidden behind a veil, it is hidden only from people who are perishing. Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don't believe. They are unable to see the glorious light of the Good News. They don't understand this message about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God." 2 Corinthians 4:3-4

Ryan T. Anderson #fundie mercatornet.com

In Sunday’s New York Times, Andrea Long Chu writes a heartfelt and heartbreaking op-ed on life with gender dysphoria. Titled “My New Vagina Won’t Make Me Happy,” the op-ed reveals painful truths about many transgender lives and inadvertently communicates almost the exact opposite of its intended argument.

Next week, Chu will undergo vaginoplasty surgery. Or, as Chu puts it: “Next Thursday, I will get a vagina. The procedure will last around six hours, and I will be in recovery for at least three months.”

Will this bring happiness? Probably not, but Chu wants it all the same: “This is what I want, but there is no guarantee it will make me happier. In fact, I don’t expect it to. That shouldn’t disqualify me from getting it.”

Chu argues that the simple desire for sex-reassignment surgery should be all that is required for a patient to receive it. No consideration for authentic health and wellbeing or concern about poor outcomes should prevent a doctor from performing the surgery if a patient wants it. Chu explains: “no amount of pain, anticipated or continuing, justifies its withholding.”

This is a rather extreme conclusion. Chu writes: “surgery’s only prerequisite should be a simple demonstration of want.” This is quite a claim. And we’ll come back to it. But as the op-ed builds to this stark conclusion, Chu reveals many frequently unacknowledged truths about transgender lives—truths that we should attend to.

Sex isn’t “assigned,” and surgery can’t change it

First, Chu acknowledges that the surgery won’t actually “reassign” sex: “my body will regard the vagina as a wound; as a result, it will require regular, painful attention to maintain.”

Sex reassignment is quite literally impossible. Surgery can’t actually reassign sex, because sex isn’t “assigned” in the first place.

As I point out in When Harry Became Sally, sex is a bodily reality—the reality of how an organism is organized with respect to sexual reproduction. That reality isn’t “assigned” at birth or any time after.

Sex—maleness or femaleness—is established at a child’s conception, can be ascertained even at the earliest stages of human development by technological means, and can be observed visually well before birth with ultrasound imaging. Cosmetic surgery and cross-sex hormones don’t change biological reality.

People who undergo sex-reassignment procedures do not become the opposite sex—they merely masculinize or feminize their outward appearance.

Gender dysphoria Is deeply painful

Second, Chu acknowledges the deep pain of gender dysphoria, the sense of distress or alienation one feels at one’s bodily sex:

Dysphoria feels like being unable to get warm, no matter how many layers you put on. It feels like hunger without appetite. It feels like getting on an airplane to fly home, only to realize mid-flight that this is it: You’re going to spend the rest of your life on an airplane. It feels like grieving. It feels like having nothing to grieve.

“Transitioning” may not make things better and could make them worse

Third, Chu acknowledges that “transitioning” may not make things better and could even make things worse. Chu writes: “I feel demonstrably worse since I started on hormones.” And continues: “Like many of my trans friends, I’ve watched my dysphoria balloon since I began transition.”

Indeed, as I document in When Harry Became Sally, the medical evidence suggests that sex reassignment does not adequately address the psychosocial difficulties faced by people who identify as transgender. Even when the procedures are successful technically and cosmetically, and even in cultures that are relatively “trans-friendly,” transitioners still face poor outcomes.

Even the Obama administration admitted that the best studies do not report improvement after reassignment surgery.

In August 2016, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid wrote: “the four best designed and conducted studies that assessed quality of life before and after surgery using validated (albeit non-specific) psychometric studies did not demonstrate clinically significant changes or differences in psychometric test results after GRS [gender reassignment surgery].”

What does that mean? A population of patients is suffering so much that they would submit to amputations and other radical surgeries, and the best research the Obama administration could find suggests that it brings them no meaningful improvements in their quality of life.

Suicide is a serious risk

Fourth, Chu acknowledges a struggle with suicide ideation: “I was not suicidal before hormones. Now I often am.”

In 2016, the Obama administration acknowledged a similar reality. In a discussion of the largest and most robust study on sex-reassignment, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid pointed out “The study identified increased mortality and psychiatric hospitalization compared to the matched controls. The mortality was primarily due to completed suicides (19.1-fold greater than in control Swedes).”

These results are tragic. And they directly contradict the most popular media narratives, as well as many of the snapshot studies that do not track people over time.

Indeed, the Obama administration noted that “mortality from this patient population did not become apparent until after 10 years.” So when the media tout studies that only track outcomes for a few years, and claim that reassignment is a stunning success, there are good grounds for skepticism.

The purpose of medicine is healing

This brings us back to Chu’s argument that “surgery’s only prerequisite should be a simple demonstration of want.” What should we make of it?

Why should a doctor perform surgery when it won’t make the patient happy, it won’t accomplish its intended goal, it won’t improve the underlying condition, it might make the underlying condition worse, and it might increase the likelihood of suicide?

Chu wants to turn the profession of medicine on its head, transforming a medical doctor into nothing more than “a highly competent hired syringe,” in the words of Leon Kass.

Unfortunately, Chu isn’t alone. Many professionals now view health care—including mental health care—primarily as a means of fulfilling patients’ desires, whatever those are. Kass explains:

The implicit (and sometimes explicit) model of the doctor-patient relationship is one of contract: the physician—a highly competent hired syringe, as it were—sells his services on demand, restrained only by the law (though he is free to refuse his services if the patient is unwilling or unable to meet his fee).

Here’s the deal: for the patient, autonomy and service; for the doctor, money, graced by the pleasure of giving the patient what he wants. If a patient wants to fix her nose or change his gender, determine the sex of unborn children, or take euphoriant drugs just for kicks, the physician can and will go to work—provided that the price is right and that the contract is explicit about what happens if the customer isn’t satisfied.

This vision of medicine and medical professionals gets it wrong. Professionals ought to profess their devotion to the purposes and ideals they serve. That’s what makes them professionals, and not just service providers.

Teachers should be devoted to learning, lawyers to justice under law, and physicians to “healing the sick, looking up to health and wholeness.” Healing is “the central core of medicine,” Kass writes—“to heal, to make whole, is the doctor’s primary business.”

But Chu’s vision of medicine turns the doctor into someone who merely satisfies desires, even if what is done isn’t good for a patient. Chu writes:

I still want this, all of it. I want the tears; I want the pain. Transition doesn’t have to make me happy for me to want it. Left to their own devices, people will rarely pursue what makes them feel good in the long term. Desire and happiness are independent agents.

Sound medicine isn’t about desire, it’s about healing. To provide the best possible care, serving the patient’s medical interests requires an understanding of human wholeness and well-being. Mental health care must be guided by a sound concept of human flourishing.

Our brains and senses are designed to bring us into contact with reality, connecting us with the outside world and with the reality of ourselves. Thoughts and feelings that disguise or distort reality are misguided, and they can cause harm. In When Harry Became Sally, I argue that we need to do a better job of helping people who face these struggles.

Misrepresentations of my work

And Chu takes issue with me:

Many conservatives call this [gender dysphoria] crazy. A popular right-wing narrative holds that gender dysphoria is a clinical delusion; hence, feeding that delusion with hormones and surgeries constitutes a violation of medical ethics.

Just ask the Heritage Foundation fellow Ryan T. Anderson, whose book “When Harry Became Sally” draws heavily on the work of Dr. Paul McHugh, the psychiatrist who shut down the gender identity clinic at Johns Hopkins in 1979 on the grounds that trans-affirmative care meant “cooperating with a mental illness.”

Mr. Anderson writes, “We must avoid adding to the pain experienced by people with gender dysphoria, while we present them with alternatives to transitioning.”

Of course I never call people with gender dysphoria crazy. And I explicitly state in the book that I take no position on the technical question of whether someone’s thinking that he or she is the opposite sex is a clinical delusion. That’s why Chu couldn’t quote any portion of my book saying as much.

Throughout the book, I point out that the feelings that people who identify as transgender report are real—they really feel a disconnect with their bodily sex—but I also acknowledge the fact that those feelings don’t change bodily reality. I recognize the real distress that gender dysphoria can cause, but never do I call people experiencing it crazy.

I repeatedly acknowledge that gender dysphoria is a serious condition, that people who experience a gender identity conflict should be treated with respect and compassion, that we need to find better, more humane and effective, responses to people who experience dysphoria.

Nevertheless, Chu claims that I am engaged in “‘compassion-mongering,’ peddling bigotry in the guise of sympathetic concern.”

For the record, Chu never contacted me regarding my research or my book. Nor did the Times contact me to verify any of the claims made about me in the op-ed. Indeed, this is the second time the New York Times has published an op-ed with inaccurate criticisms of me and my book.

Americans disagree about gender identity and the best approaches to treating gender dysphoria. We need to respect the dignity of people who identify as transgender while also doing everything possible to help people find wholeness and happiness.

That will require a better conversation about these issues, which is why I wrote my book. And it’s presumably why Chu wrote this op-ed. Now is not the time for personal attacks and name-calling, but for sober and respectful truth-telling.

Chu may regard me as a “bigot,” but I regard Chu as a fellow human being made in the image and likeness of God who is struggling with a painful and dangerous condition. As such, Chu deserves care and support that will bring health and wholeness—not the on-demand delivery of “services” that even Chu acknowledges are unlikely to make life better and may make it very much worse.

Phillip Marlowe #racist incogman.net

I remember back when I was in college, I used to live in this small, nicely renovated 1930’s era building [...] Beneath me lived this skinny, kind of freaky-looking Jew. Obviously gay, too. Crudely bleached-blond spiky hair, lisping voice, pinched, rat-like face, always acting excitable or depressed — given to wildly alternating swings in demeanor — the whole nine yards for weirdo Jew homosexuals.

For some reason the homo thought I was a nice guy (I really am kind of personable). Maybe I didn’t treat him like other straights or maybe he just had the hots for my sexy White tushie — I don’t know. I hung out with rather wild people back then, even went out a few times to this nearby homo nightclub with my totally debauched and bootylicious Art Department girlfriend — a fetching auburned-haired girl who liked dancing to disco and booming electronic music of the time. Ah: The things I once did for love!

And I was completely sure the downstairs homo knew I was straight, considering all the college babes hanging out at my “pad” with me and my Neo-sixties hippie Jewish roommate (yep, INCOG lived with a pot-smoking Jew for about a year).

One day the downstairs faggot stopped by for a visit. He wanted to give me something since he was moving down to the New Orleans to join the homo “community.” What on earth could it be, I wondered?

We went out to the nice little porch we all had overlooking the street, where he unwrapped it for me. It was GD dog skull! Immaculately cleaned with all the teeth perfectly in place. Bizarre. The morbid freak told me he collected various animal skulls as a hobby and had an extra one to give me [...] I later gave the skull a decent burial out in the woods. For real. I was scared the gayboy might have gave me some bad faggot or Jew juju. Who knows? As for him, I never heard anything more, thank God. Chances are, he turned into a shambling petri dish and croaked during the AIDS “holocaust” by then starting to spread across gay “communities.” Hell, thinking back, it looked like the little homo already had “slim disease” (and no, homo-loving libtards, I’m perfectly clean, even have a solid rating with the American Red Cross for blood donations).

[...]

So, you might say I’m relatively familiar with gay type people. Or at least the ones from a couple of decades ago. I’m fairly certain they are still just as disgusting and wacked in the head now, as they were then. Probably more so, looking at some of the photos coming out of places like San FranSICKO these days.

believeacts2 #fundie believeacts2blog.wordpress.com

DREAM:

I was standing in a room with another person to my right. Suddenly I saw Obama in front of me, wearing a white dress shirt and black business pants. He quickly approached me with an evil look on his face, then slapped me on my left upper arm. He then stepped away from me, looking at me the entire time.

I instantly held up my right hand and made a pinching motion with my thumb and index finger, pointing at Obama. Lightning shot out of my right hand and onto Obama’s face.

When the lightning hit Obama’s face, it transformed into a beastly image.

Obama’s eyes were highlighted by a rectangular image that appeared to be electronic flames, done by a special effects camera. His eyes were glowing red.

~ End of Dream ~

WORD FROM THE LORD (given over a two day period, 12-29-15 and 12-30-15):

“MOST WILL NOT SEE IT” (Obama as the Anti-Christ)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

INTERPRETATION:

EVEN As I write this dream up to share it, I know as a Word directly from the LORD, “MOST WILL NOT SEE IT”. I understand the LORD was telling me MOST will not see (or believe) Obama is THE Anti-Christ (Revelation 13), even though some of us in the Body of Christ have been given this revelation to share and warn any who will listen to what the Holy Spirit prompts us to proclaim: “OBAMA IS THE ANTICHRIST.”

BUT . . . MOST PROFESSING CHRISTIANS DID NOT TAKE THIS REVELATION TO THE LORD IN PRAYER, ASKING HIM TO CONFIRM THIS. . .

As I’m typing this dream out, what comes to mind about the image of Obama is the character from “Star Trek, The Next Generation”.

While that image of Obama did not look like this character, the focus was on the importance of the eyes.

The Scriptural reference that came to mind, regarding the focus on Obama’s eyes:

Matthew 6:22 – 23
“The eye is the lamp of the body;
so then if your eye is clear,
your whole body will be full of light.
“But if your eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness.
If then the light that is in you is darkness, how great is the darkness!”

Obama is full of demonic darkness and evil; the supernatural transformation in his eyes points to the supernatural transformation he will undergo, when Satan is fully manifesting in and through him.

The lightening shooting out of my hand, towards Obama,

As I pinch my pointer finger and thumb together,
represents the sharing of my testimony, in writing (and verbally as well), of the revelation I was given by the Holy Spirit:

“OBAMA IS THE ANTICHRIST”

(please see related info links below).

This has been a difficult task for me and others . . .

who have been given this revelation and command by the LORD to share it, because it comes with the resulting response of: mocking, scorning, name-calling, disbelief, denial by others, belittled, verbally abused, etc., yet I and others are still responsible for warning and sharing this repulsive revelation, which MOST professing Christians will NOT even take this to the LORD in prayer to see if it is true!!!!!

I will repeat right now: “OBAMA IS THE ANTICHRIST”

This dream points to the coming INCREASED and DIRECT attack upon Christians, by Obama, who will be taking his global roll as “THE Anti-Christ” (Revelation 13). I do not have a date on this global role, but I do know we are in the season of his “revealing”. I also know his “revealing” as the antichrist has been going on throughout the last several years, to some in the Body of Christ, through dreams, visions and revelations. We will also see continued erosion of freedom as U.S. Citizens, which will be going global: a loss of freedom, as we see “THE RISE OF THE BEAST” . . As we see “NEW WORLD ORDER”.

Obama constitution
Obama golf
NWO
Obama flag
Warning
Warning
danger

Obama has been instrumental in the attack and slaughter of Christians in the Middle East, by mandating the training, funding and continued support of the Islamic jihad group called ISIS; this is going to increase globally: ISLAMIC JIHAD.

We WILL see an increased demonic power and darkness arise in Obama that will be noticeable by all who have “eyes to see” and “ears to hear”, YET MOST WILL STILL NOT SEE OBAMA AS THE ANTICHRIST, even though the warnings have been going out about this revelation, as directed by the Holy Spirit.

I PLEAD with each person who is reading this to do the following:

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE take this warning to the LORD in prayer to see if it is the truth:

“OBAMA IS THE ANTICHRIST”.

Michel Chossudovsky #conspiracy globalresearch.ca

The plush dinner event with China’s president Xi Jinping at Mar-a-Lago on the evening of April 6 was carefully planned to coincide with Trump’s missile strikes against Syria.

Xi and Trump were accompanied by their wives; guests, family members and high-level officials from both countries were in attendance at the Palm Beach Mar-a Lago “replicate” of Rome’s Palazzo Chigi 16th Century dining room.

Later that evening on Thursday April 6, it was dessert time: The Donald was at the dinner table eating a delicious chocolate cake together with Xi Jinping, while also ordering Tomahawk missile strikes against Syria, in the presence of China’s president and his entourage:

...

Atrocities were committed and Trump ordered airstrikes which have resulted in further deaths of innocent civilians including children.

US intelligence is often based on the art of deceit, i.e. the fabrication of evidence.

But in this case there was “no art of deceit”. The White House report which Trump used to justify his airstrikes constitutes fake evidence and “sloppy intelligence”. Did it have the endorsement of the intelligence community?

There is ample evidence of a US coverup contained in this scanty White House “intelligence report” which has been refuted.

see Dr. Theodore Postol’s incisive report:

Assessment of White House Intelligence Report About Nerve Agent Attack in Khan Shaykhun, Syria By Dr. Theodore Postol, April 13, 2017

No credible evidence that the Syrian president is killing his own people has been provided.

The false flag does not hold up to scrutiny, yet this “sloppy intelligence” seems to have convinced the President and Commander in Chief of the United States of America, who’s eating a chocolate cake with the president of China…

And the Chinese president knows that the intelligence is fake.

Washington (which supported the opposition rebels in the use of chemical weapons) rather than Damascus is responsible for extensive crimes against humanity.

JobeWatson14 #sexist reddit.com

(Posting this because I hope this is just some incel making up a story. This is seriously deppressing if true.)

Ex-Chad Here. Incels are 100% right

Log in / Register
r/IncelReddit
Ex-Chad Here. Incels are 100% right
u/JobeWatson14
I was asked to repost this from incels...I think some of my comments are being filtered as spam anyway.

This is my first time on Reddit and I made my account just because I stumbled on this community and realized that I've never found myself feeling such a sense of empathy for strangers before. I found it by searching around the net for information about the "Blackpill" in the political sense (I'm normally on 4chan, 8chan) but I've found it's just as applicable here (probably more so).

I used to be a Chad. I was never a frat guy or a spring breaker type but I used to be a musician. The music scene I was involved in didn't have girls who look like the "stacies" that I see pictures of here necessarily but it was full of girls who would rank around a 7 or 8 who would fuck anyone playing in a band who had decent looks.

My own looks used to be around a 7. I'm not 6ft tall and I didn't have abs but coupled with my musical ability, in the eyes of the band whores, I was put at more of a 9. I spent most of my 20s doing drugs and hooking up with girls. The compliments I got most often were never about my looks. It was always about my personality and song writing.

when I was 28, I settled down with a girl who wasn't a total whore. She had slept with a few people but so had I so it didn't bother me. We were together for 4 years. She came to all my performances and was super supportive of all my musical endeavors. Outside of the music scene, things were very domestic. We sat around watching movies, had sex all the time, cooked for each other and eventually we moved in together. I turned down the many offers of sex from former fuck buddies because I thought she was "the one".

I got into a single car drunk driving accident after playing a show one night and ended up in the hospital. During this time of my life, I drove drunk all the time. I'm not proud of it. I just thought I was invincible. This was the first time I got in a wreck. I went down the side of a hill and wasn't wearing a seat belt. I went halfway through the windshield after cracking the driver side window with my face. The left side of my face was lacerated beyond recognition. My glasses were smashed into my left eye which I can no longer see out of. At the time, I felt lucky to be alive. I remember my girlfriend's face, when the bandages came off of mine. It was an expression of horror. I told her right then "please don't leave me" and she began to cry and said she could never do that.

She stayed with me for about 4 months while I healed. Miraculously, I didn't have any internal injuries and the only thing I broke was my right arm. My face, however was destroyed. The lacerations themselves were bad enough but the nerves were also damaged so that half of my face is paralyzed. I smile like a stroke victim now. Once the months had gone by and it became apparent that my face would never be what it used to be, my girlfriend left me citing the drunk driving as the reason. We used to ride around under the influence all the time and she herself continues to do that to this day, so I knew it was because of my face. I believe she is currently in a new "serious relationship" with another guy who I used to be on the same playing field as.

My relationship wasn't the only thing I lost because of my "new look". My band mates were all good looking guys as well. When it became apparent that my face was driving away our female fans, I was replaced. They told me that it was because I wasn't able to play guitar as well since my accident.

I was friends with many of the club owners and they allowed me to play solo a few times. None of the old female fans gave a shit about my songwriting anymore. The only people who came to see me were sympathetic friends. I only played a few times and the crowds got smaller and smaller so I eventually decided to quit putting my ugly mug under the spotlight. I quit playing music altogether. I continued to attend concerts at the local venues and tried to talk to girls I used to fuck all the time and was treated like a leper. It has been 6 years since all that happened and I've had zero contact with any girls ever since.

I now DJ at a bar every Friday and Saturday night. Another sympathy gig from a friend. It's a place with a different crowd every night and it's dark. I've grown my hair out long and I try to wear a hoodie to hide my face. Girls approach me all the time. They drunkenly put their arms around me and request songs. Once they catch an eyeful of my face, depending on how wasted they are, they either politely back away after getting their song queued up or shout "OH MY GOD WHAT HAPPENED TO YOU?"

Even if you dress like garbage, don't groom yourself and are known for being a piece of shit, being a DJ is generally a gig where pussy is almost a guarantee. That is of course, unless your face is fucked up.

So... I don't give a fuck what the normies say to you guys. Women of all types only care about looks. Your interests, sense of humor, talent or money will always be secondary. Women will adopt whatever it is you're into if they find you attractive. I've seen liberal girls turn into right wingers, hippie girls go straightedge, feminists turn into tradwives, and all kinds of other 180s for Chad. Literally nothing else matters but your face and I'm living fucking proof.

I now live my days abusing prescription pills to numb myself from this lonely existence. I think about suicide often. It crosses my mind every day.

anyway, as someone who has seen things from Chad's perspective and from that of a (albeit recent) incel, I would like to put forward - AMA

Zealous Zeth #fundie fstdt.com

The only good thing with depressions or over-sensitiveness is that many of Christ's enemies are into it. It is laughably easy to crush atheist American scum over the internet using only words, especially gay ones. It's a bit trickier here at home, since swedes are not that sensitive, most swedes do not care for insults and not too many are depressed.

Also, Jessica, you little modernist heretic: There is no reason at all to be "respectful" to atheist scum. They are not "respectful" themselves, nor does the Church demand that such p.c. "respectfulness" should be shown towards these filthy self-proclaimed apes. The internet is not some kind of politically correct tea party!

And being "hurtful" (please don't use these politically correct lol-words, I can't take you seriously) is only a good thing when fighting atheists. This man is evidently a true crusader, and you ought to respect him.

feedmeyourhatesjws #fundie reddit.com

[Commenting under "Black children invited by two civil rights militants swimming in the swimming pool of the White-only Monson Motel. To force them out, James Brock, owner of the motel, pours acid into the water. Saint Augustine, Florida, United States. June 18, 1964 [275*429]"]

They were trespassing. Are you saying just because you have dark skin it gives you the right to use other people's property against their wishes. Stand your ground, this is Florida by the way. Where is George Zimmerman when you need him.

Dynastia #racist kiwifar.ms

Abbos are the native indigineous inhabitatnts of Australia. They're basically the worst race ever and I'm not even racist. They're just so bad. They're all sloppy ridiculous drunks and retarded from huffing petrol and spraypaint. They're so bad that tribal land has to ban petrol and alcohol and vegemite in case they make vegemite pruno.

If you go to abbo lands they will get all chimped up on meth and try to kill you spears. I'm not even joking they throw spears at people and rape people. They rape kids and if anyone tries to stop them they cry about it being 'their culture'. Abbos are shit.

I hate abbos.

MohammedWazzaPaedophile #fundie barenakedislam.com

This is what happens after decades of voting for Socialism/FemiNazis. Their current PM Lofven even thinks “immigrants” – read muzzturds” – have more right to Sweden than the actual native born white Swedes – that’s how mentally deranged these fucktards have become!

Swedenstan is what Swedenstanis voted for & that’s what they’ll get by 2025 at the latest. Anyone who actually considers themselves a real Swede better get out while they can, there is no hope, no turning back the clock.

Germany is going to the polls in 2 weeks time & they will vote more of the same – there is little difference between the traitors Merkel & Schulz.

jimbeam #racist niggermania.net

Working 24s with a paramedic last night. Around 3am we get a call. These two spade emts were switching out the battery to the power cot. One acts like he is going to throw the battery. The other one tells him to go ahead and throw it. Yes throw something painted black in the middle of the night. Good idea. The battery is about 2.5 lbs or more.

He throws it at him. The nig receiving misses the catch and it hits him right in the nose. His nose starts gushing blood. The other nigger frantically called dispatch and told them what happened.

The stupid nigger did not know how to stop a nose bleed. Dispatch had to give instructions. The injured nigger pinched his nostrils together and was rocking back and forth when we got there. Paramedic said "watch this". "What ya got epistaxis?", he said. Nigger said, "no my par-ner hare gaw a nose bleed" I laughed. Niggers obviously aren't to bright with medical terminology. Even though we learned that in class.

He sent me to check on the injured nig while the paramedic asked what happened. He comes over and checks on me makes sure I got everything under control. He asks the nigger why he did not do anything? Then he ripped into the one nig for not knowing what to do. "How the heck do you not know how to stop a nose bleed?" The nigger did not answer. "Are you an EMT?" he asked. The nig nodded yes nervously. "THEN START ACTING LIKE ONE!", he said.

Then he rips into both of them about throwing the battery around like that in the first place. "Why are you throwing company equipment around like that? This is why shit around here does not last!!". Yeah do not wake this paramedic during his sleep time for b.s. He will bite. Lol. I got some 4x4 gauze and got the bleeding under control. We ended up taking the spook to the ER for a possible broken nose. The paramedic called the supervisor and told them what happened with these two idiots.

How their fooling around caused an injury and how Stupid did not know how to treat that injury. My paramedic documented everything and gave it to the supervisor this morning. Hopefully it will get these two knuckleheads off the street. Wtf though you are an EMT and you cannot figure out how to stop a nose bleed? These two are a liability waiting to happen.

Jason Jorjani #racist rawstory.com

Though many members of the alt-right claim to not be racists or white supremacists, videos recorded by an infiltrator among their ranks proves otherwise.

Patrik Hermansson, a 25-year-old Swede, went undercover to infiltrate the alt-right, creating a fake identity that led him to meetings with some of the group’s leaders.

As video Hermansson provided to the New York Times shows, he got one of the group’s highest-ranking members — Alt-Right Corporation board member Jason Reza Jorjani — to admit his “final solution” for minorities.

“It’s gonna end with the expulsion of the majority of the migrants, including [Muslim] citizens,” Jorjani told an undercover Hermansson at a pub near the Empire State Building in New York City. “It’s gonna end with concentration camps and expulsions and war at the cost of a few hundred million people.”

“We will have a Europe, in 2050, where the bank notes have Adolf Hitler, Napoleon Bonaparte, Alexander the Great,” he continued. “And Hitler will be seen like that: like Napoleon, like Alexander, not like some weird monster who is unique in his own category — no, he is just going to be seen as a great European leader.”

Jorjani also claimed to have connections within the Trump administration, and to even have spoken to the president himself.

“The scary thing about the Alt Right Corp and Jason Jorjani is that they’re building a media empire,” Hermansson said at the beginning of the video, citing the AltRight.com website Jorjani runs with the help of notorious figures like Richard Spencer.

Mack Major #fundie facebook.com

Jesus said that when a man LOOKS at a woman to lust after her, he's already committed the adulterous act in his heart. *Matt 5:28

Fellas, did you know that LUST was an open doorway into the spirit realm?

Not only that: it's a one way door, meaning that whatever lies on the other side of that door has permission to enter your life by the simple act of you lusting after it.

Allow me to help some of you understand deeper level spiritual understanding:

The spirit realm is a very real inter-dimensional world that exists right alongside our three dimensional world of reality. To keep it simple, let's just say it's an extra layer of a deeper reality that we all swim in daily. Most just do so unaware.

The spirit realm is populated with different species of life too, just like the world we are most familiar with has different species of reptiles, mammals, birds, fish, insects, germs, etc.

Some of these species are extremely wicked. And they are highly intelligent. More intelligent in fact than humans are. And they hate you.

These species are what the bible refer to as unclean spirits, devils, demons, evil spirits, etc. And they're like really nasty bacteria, viruses or germs whose only purpose is to kill and destroy life in every way possible.

One of these species that exist in this realm are called spirits of lust. And their only purpose is to occupy the mind or body of any person who is willing to host them.

Once those spirits of lust enter into you, they enslave you, open you up for more spirits to come in, and ultimately use you to spread their sick virus into others.

Once you are no longer any good to them, they will shipwreck your life completely. And may even kill you. It may sound far-fetched, but I can assure you it's not!

When Jesus warned us not to lust after women, it had a deeper purpose than just stopping men from being "poon" hounds. He was actually showing you how to keep yourself from being invaded by one of these foul spirits of lust.

Your lust is the open invitation and legal grounds for these spirits of lust to enter you and control your life.

And once they enter, they don't leave easy. They'll bog you down, make you into a bonafide simp, steal your time, life and productivity from you. You won't be able to make much money; at least not as much as you should be making.

Because your whole driving focus, every free waking thought will be on seeking sexual gratification. For many of you, your computer hard drive and cell phone photos are proof of this very point.

I see you online too: timeline filled with photos of half-naked women. Quick to comment on any female who has a picture of herself up in something tight or revealing: "Daaaaang! You sexy!

Why you teasing me like that? Gorgeous! Stunning! Wife material!"
All evidence of extreme thirst, aka LUST.

You need to also be aware that certain environments are set up because they are conducive to filling any unsuspecting man who wander in with lust spirits. Examples of such places would be:

Strip clubs, night clubs, lounges, parties, comedy clubs, concert venues, X-rated movie theaters, Black bike weekends, beach parties, Greek frat festivals, college frat parties, bachelor parties, etc.

Basically, any place where women will be present dressed as skimpily and enticingly as possible is where you'll find plenty of lust demons lurking for new victims. And sad to say: this also includes many CHURCHES...

And please be aware that many women you see online or around you, showcasing all their lovely female assets, are really nothing more than secret agents of Satan sent to trap men's souls via lust.

So quit giving such women props and attention in the hopes that she'll give you a shot! That never works anyway, because women like that feed off your lust and attention. All they want is your worship anyway.

Who told us that lusting after women was what men are supposed to do? Men are supposed to control themselves, possess their bodies in honor, build and create things, establish families and lead.

But you can't do that if your thoughts are filled with sex 24/7.
SHAKE THOSE LUST DEMONS OUT OF YOUR LIFE TODAY!

If you've read thus far, I'd like to present an eBook I wrote that is available right away for immediate and instant download. It's titled:

'Diva, Goddess, Queen: Breaking The Power of Soul Ties, Lust and Sexual Demons'. You can download it here:

www.edendecoded.com/books/diva-goddess-queen

If you're a man who's struggling with lust, filled with that thirsty energy, and you want to break totally and completely free: download this ebook NOW.

If you desire to empower yourself against the wiles of wicked women and their lust spirits: Don't ignore this message.

The sooner you make an active effort to liberate yourself from the tyranny of lust-fullness, the sooner you'll regain your rights and freedom as a man!

Jesus Christ provides absolute and total freedom. And this freedom is available for whosoever will, today. That means YOU.

So download the ebook, and be sure to look to Jesus: who alone can powerfully drive those lust spirits out of your life once and for all.

God bless.

[Unidentified man] #fundie news.asiaone.com

A 60-year-old man, who had sex with his daughter, told religious department officers that incest was permissible because she had taken a vow of slavery, Harian Metro reported.

The tabloid said the man and his daughter, in her 30s, were caught by the Federal Territory Islamic Department (Jawi) officers at a hotel in Jalan Putra, Kuala Lumpur, at 1am on Wednesday.

The man was in shorts while his daughter was naked under the sheets when the officers raided the room.

"The man brazenly said his partner was his daughter who lived in Medan, Indonesia, with his second wife, who is an Indonesian," a source was quoted by the newspaper.

"The officers believe the father and daughter had already had sex based on condoms and sex pills found in the room."

During interrogation, the man said he slept with his daughter because it was "permissible" according to religion.

He claimed that his religious teacher in Indonesia had told him that the daughter only needed to recite a vow of slavery three times and she would be "halal" to have sex with her family members if she allowed it.

The case is still under investigation and the man is currently out on bail.

The Modern Gnostic #conspiracy themoderngnostic.com

The recent spate of amateurish false flag shootings,

…which are now being rolled out at an increasingly rapid pace, give one cause to wonder: why? Why are the elite orchestrating such feeble and poorly executed false flag shootings? With all their money, power, control of the media, control of law enforcement and control of politicians, why can’t they make these false flag shootings look more real? Aren’t they worried that with such amateurish false flag shootings they are running the risk of being caught? Of being exposed? Of doing such an atrocious job that it defies common belief, and thus acts as a catalyst to wake people up?

Ridiculous, Poorly Executed and Utterly Fake Aspects of Recent False Flag Shootings

Around the world, and especially in America, the number of false flag operations these days (whether they be false flag shootings, false flag bombings or any other kind of false flag attack) is truly astonishing. Another day, another false flag.

...

Have the Elite Become Too Arrogant and Sloppy?

Look at all the false flag attacks the elite have already pulled off. It’s a favorite weapon of theirs, and it’s primarily psychological. It uses the brute force of a bullet, sure, but the main point is to mislead, trick and deceive. Since false flag operations have been used from everything to start wars (assassination of Prince Ferdinand 1914), to get countries into wars (sinking of Lusitania 1916, Pearl Harbor 1941), to demonize and destroy political opponents (Reichstag fire 1933) and to pass draconian legislation (9/11), the elite are clearly very familiar in planning and executing them.

Is it possible the elite have become so arrogant that they don’t think they need to carry out these psychological operations more professionally? Do they not care if many people quickly spot the obvious errors, contradictions and loopholes? Maybe they are just counting on the fact that a large majority still cannot see through false flag ops, no matter how quickly alternative news and independent media get it.

Ben Garrison #conspiracy grrrgraphics.com

[Jeffrey Epstein’s death] was an over the top, brazen example of the sloppiness of the Deep State. They know we’re wise to their shenanigans, but they don’t care. We know they always rig things in their favor. They laugh and rub our faces in it — knowing we can do nothing about it.

Now the FBI has raided Epstein’s New York home as well as his ‘Pedo Island.’ They’re there not to collect evidence, but to hide and destroy it — much as they helped Hillary bleach bit her server and hammer cell phones. The FBI, CIA, and the Mossad protect the Deep State, of which they are a part. They’re not about to allow any more truth seep out — and it won’t, no matter how angry [Attorney General William] Barr becomes.

Bill and Hillary escape justice once again. What a surprise! Bill flew dozens of times with his buddy Epstein on the Lolita Express to Pedo Island where he undoubtedly dabbled with kidnapped children. If the Clintons were behind the friend’s suicide, then their body trail has grown still longer. They’ll never be locked up — ever. There is no equal justice in America. It’s gone. Poof. Up in smoke.

Epstein may not even be dead. They may have switched bodies. Jeffrey could be on another island or in Israel right now. He’ll no doubt resume his fetish for under-aged girls along with his masters and colleagues.

Some Incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: So female meets criminal online. They go to drinks and he has to stop by his grow house. Guy gets in a violent fight at 1am, covered in blood and had to skip town. Female goes to reddit to "see how to talk to him about violence". This is her response.

image

I would try to make sure that he's never able to contact or find you ever again.

So I understand why you would say that but I really like him. We have a lot of similar interests and the sex is really good.

These are not great reasons to stay with a dangerous man.

You know you can find these things from someone who doesn't beat people half-dead?

I haven't been able to yet. He's honestly the first person I feel I've really been able to connect with in years. Idk what that says about me. He’s usually so nice!

(I_actually_prefer_)

Why do women try so hard to make me hate them?

This is why all philosophers and religious leaders from the dawn of time have hated the nature of foids. Their very essence is of deception, dissimulation, monkey branching, disloyalty. It’s how they’ve survived and who they pave always procured resources. Even foids hate other foids because they see in other foids what they see on themselves,

(Kormaken)

initiate foid translator
.....
she is with him because the sex is good
.....
sex is good because he is chad
.....
conclusion: she is with him because he is chad

(bmaster00)

Foids rather get murdered by chad than to date ugly men. Purest form of black pill

(InternationalBrain4)

They keep proving the blackpill again and again and again... How can an unattractive man still be bluepilled nowadays?...

Enough of them get just a trickle of the satisfaction they're looking for so they assume they've 'made it.'

It's not hard to make an addict out of someone- just deprive them of something they need, put them in a life situation where they're constantly under stress and then provide them just enough of their craving that they wouldn't dare going off the reservation. Remember, most people who picked up a drug habit- cocaine and heroin- in Vietnam to cope with living in a war zone actually dropped the habit after they came home, and almost all of them dropped the habit without excessive intervention or rehab.

(letsgobish29)

he's high t and hot. but women always have to give these bullshit spiels about connecting and all the other cliches to make sure she's saying the 'right thing'. no thought process whatsoever, just complete mindless conformity to the safe socially acceptable responses.

(blazze)

femme would rather live "orange is the new black" lifestyle rather than a safe option !

"I would try to make sure he's never able to find or contact you ever again"

Other femme gives very good advice which is promptly ignore.

"He's honestly the first person I feel I've really been able to connect with in years"

Translation : I've been on the boyfriend carousel for so long, only the drama of thug maxx really gets me wet.

(Burnvictim-Chad)

If you think this guy is good in bed you are bluepilled still. Sex with him is good because he is good looking and he is a violent animal and not on account of him having good technique.

(vosidit98)

As I've said before: Women don't lke seeing violence but knowing "her guy" can crack the skulls of the rest makes them wet.

Women LOVE assholes. And if the asshole is good looking it's an even bigger boon.

She has literally no common interests with him, but women are massive copycats when it comes to their dream guy.

Some Incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: i wish my personality was as good as her boyfriend's

image

As someone who runs with a lot of frat boys, most of my guy friends (and my boyfriend) are serial rapists... it's not good, but it's a thing.

(xxxismydaddyy)

Hahaha but its ok cause theyre cute rich white boys ugh i hate them why do i sleep with them right? Haha

(Sleepcel)

Imagine looking at this comment and thinking women deserve human rights

(hhhh__)

...

. .

......

.

This is a joke right?

She just admitted she is friends with a bunch of disgusting criminals. Why didn't she inform the police don't foids watch out for each other when it comes to this shit? I get protecting her bf, they love violent partners, but even the others? And why the fuck isn't that comment downvoted to oblivion? She just admitted to standing by as rapes where/are happening.

Jfl just when I thought I couldn't be more blackpilled. It just keeps going.

gloomcel #sexist reddit.com

Just be the Chaddiest of Chads, bro

Women might not admit it to her friends but she’ll sleep with a goth or emo Chad

And no matter how much she dyes her hair, wears dark makeup, and dresses goth she will still want to blow Chad, even if he’s Frat Boy Chad. She just won’t tell anyone.

Women are all whores. Exactly the same. This bitch is just doing what women do... which is lie. If people know that she’s a common slut then it lowers her value. Gotta keep the beta bucks guys thinking they have a chance!

Old Man Montgomery #fundie oldmanmontgomery.wordpress.com

[=Authors Note: For the sake of trimming, some of the Bible verses in the original page have been removed=]

From the website of ‘johnshore.com’

These were published and dated December 16, 2010. I have only recently become aware of this ‘movement’ via Facebook. (One never knows what one will find there.) These are referred to as the “Sixteen Tenets of ‘unfundamentalist Christians’ , known also or previously known as ‘ThruWay Christians’. Being the old-fashioned, hard-nosed Bible thumper that I am, I disagree with some facets of this and the conclusions of the entirety.

Of course I have reasons and those reasons are published below. Just for convenience, I numbered the statements, replacing what appeared in my copy as a paragraph ‘dot’.

Just for the record, as the article was dated December 16, 2010, it is entirely possible Mr. Shore has completely changed his mind and recanted this whole document. On the other hand, I just checked Mr. Shore’s last blog entry and he’s still pitching the “UnFund” theme.

Caution: If the reader is not a Christian believer, much of this discussion will seem pointless. Feel free to read on, but if you’re confused, don’t worry, it happens to lots of folks.

Here beings the tenets:

1. Jesus Christ was God incarnate. He performed miracles; as a means of providing for the irrevocable reconciliation of humankind to God he sacrificed himself on the cross; he rose from the dead; he left behind for the benefit of all people the totality of himself in the form of the indwelling Holy Spirit.

So far, I’m in agreement. Jesus is God incarnate; the ‘Son’ who is God Himself. Jesus was executed and killed (no alternatives) on a Roman cross under Roman law. Jesus’ death was the final sacrifice needed to atone for the sin of all people who appeal to Him for forgiveness. Jesus rose from the dead on the third day showing Himself to be God and giving a promise to all of an Eternal life in Heaven with Him. He sent the Third Person of the Godhead, the ‘Holy Spirit’ to believers after His ascension.

2. Christ and Christianity are meant to be understood, appreciated, and experienced as galvanizing inspirations for living a life of love, compassion, fairness, peace, and humility. Period.

Now we’re disagreeing. The primary purpose and function of Christianity is to repair the breach between God and mankind due to mankind’s rebellion and disobedience. Being forgiven by Jesus and redeemed by His sacrifice, mankind can have a direct and proper relationship with God. The qualities of love, compassion, fairness, peace and humility are by-products of that proper relationship, not the primary aim.

Am I splitting hairs here? Not as much as one might think; the matter becomes clearer as we proceed.

3. The Bible is a collection of a great many separate documents written by different people in different languages over thousands of years. Properly understanding both the letter and spirit of the Bible necessarily entails taking into account the historical and cultural contexts that so greatly inform so much of its text. The size, density, history and complexity of the Bible render unfeasible the idea that not one of its words reflects more man’s will than God’s. The spirit of God is inerrant; people—even those impassioned by the conviction that God is speaking directly to or through them—are not.

The one starts out well and descends into heresy. The Bible was written over a period of approximately 1500 years. The Books of Moses, the Torah – sometimes Pentateuch, was written in the period between the Exodus from Egypt, around 1400 B. C. to the time of the Babylonian Captivity, around 600 to 530 B. C. (give or take a decade or so.) The book of Revelation, written by John the Apostle was written around 90 A. D. The rest was written somewhere in between, with the possible exception of Job. Job was one of the earliest sections written and may predate Moses. The Bible was assuredly written by at least forty different authors. (For instance, the books of Judges, Kings and Chronicles were written over periods of time and one author could not have written them all; they require accounts from events several hundred years apart. The Torah was more than likely written by a number of scribes with Moses or a later, Babylonian scholar as ‘editor’ and having final input. Genesis is obviously based on oral traditions of the Israelite nation.) The books reflect social conventions and cultural coloring of the times involved.

However, it is the message of Almighty God to humanity. No matter how much a human can foul up, the integrity of the message is based on God’s ability to ensure His message is properly passed on. No human can foul up or outright lie good enough to defeat God’s purpose. So as much as mankind wrote the words on paper (papyrus or whatever), the ‘Word’ (Greek ‘logos’, meaning idea, identity or concept) is that of God. As such, it is inerrant in message.

The idea of the Bible being ‘written by man and therefore possibly distorted’ is an old heresy. It was argued about in the earliest councils trying to settle on the ‘Bible’ and is the basis for several cults who claim to be Christian, but rely on teachings of extra Biblical origin. The heresy also finds much favor among those who wish to discredit any one particular facet of Christian doctrine. Under any version, the idea the Bible isn’t correct means either God really doesn’t care about the message or God is incapable of protecting His own plan. Christians cannot in good faith (no pun intended) accept either alternative.

4. Anyone seeking to mix church and state has failed to understand the nature and proper role of either. Belief that all people are created equal and are deserving of equal protection under the law is foundational to all modern democratic nations. To incorporate the inherently exclusionary imperatives of a particular religion into the determinedly inclusive system of democracy would be to undermine the very spirit of democracy by pushing it toward a theocracy.

This is a pretty silly statement and is highly ignorant of history. The ‘foundational’ belief of people being created equal and deserving equal protection under law is uniquely derived from the Judeo-Christian tradition. It is not found in Islam, Confucianism, Buddhism, Hinduism or any of the other ‘religions’ of the world. It is Christianity that fostered Democracy, not Democracy that fostered Christianity.

Additionally, it was Christian believers and supporters who founded the United States as a nation with no state religion. The United States was not founded as a ‘Christian nation’, but was indeed begun as a ‘nation of Christians’. To pretend otherwise is to ignore history and to invite serious question as to the point of the discussion. One must also note that all movements to ‘remove’ the influence of Christianity from the United States and civil laws result in the promotion of either Secular Humanism or Islam.

There are no moral vacuums.

5. It’s not possible to read Paul’s New Testament writings and remain unmoved by his open heart, intellectual prowess, and staggering bravery. And yet Paul (who, after all, spent years zealously persecuting and having executed untold numbers of Christians) must remain to us a mortal man. More than reasonable, it is incumbent upon those who claim to seek the deepest knowledge of Christ to subject the words of Paul to the same kinds of objective analysis we would the words of any man daring to describe the qualities, purposes, and desires of God.

This is a gentle, lofty and seemingly reasonable attempt to undermine the message presented by God through Paul the Apostle. What this statement does is deny the Divine inspiration and authorship of the Bible as a whole. It returns to the fore in a moment with more of the ‘villify Paul’ agenda.

6. With regards to the written identity of God, the pronoun “he” is a necessity of the English language, not an actual anatomical designation. God is neither male nor female; God contains all of both.

Again, agreement. In Hebrew, just as in English, the male pronoun unless specifically intended refers to both male and female. Jesus says (John 4:23 and 24)“But a time is coming – and now is here – when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father seeks such people to be his worshipers. God is spirit, and the people who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.” Also one notes in Genesis (chapter one, verses 26 and 27)
“Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, after our likeness, so they may rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move on the earth.”
God created humankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them,
male and female he created them.

So, both male and female were (still are, more or less, being distorted from the original model by mankind’s disobedience) created in God’s image; which manifestly means not a physical image, but a mental and spiritual image.

7. The Biblical scholarship supporting the idea that Paul never wrote a word proscribing natural homosexuality is at least as credible and persuasive as the scholarship (if not typical Bible translations) claiming that he did. Any person who uses the words of Paul in the New Testament to “prove” that homosexuality is a sin against God has either never themselves researched the matter, or has simply chosen to believe one set of equal proofs over another. Though laziness is easily enough understood, we remain mystified as to why anyone who purports to follow Jesus would choose to condemn an entire population over choosing to obey Jesus’ self-proclaimed Greatest Commandment to love one’s neighbor as one loves oneself.

Here’s the follow up to point 5. Once Paul is ‘questionable’, the condemnation of homosexuality can be dismissed as a personal quirk, or possibly an outright error on the part of Christianity (on the whole).

Here’s the premise of the tenet: Paul either really didn’t mean what he wrote about the practice of homosexuality despite what is clearly written in the original Greek manuscripts and all subsequent translations of the Bible, or Paul was mistaken and therefore not inspired by God. What an amazing statement.

Either God inspired and authored the Bible or not. If one chooses to deny God’s inspiration in part, then the whole becomes suspect. If God was lax in allowing Paul to write and publish errors, then what of the rest of the Bible is trustworthy? Conversely, if God did in fact inspire and author the Bible, then Paul’s writing is equally trustworthy.

Leviticus 18
This entire section (several chapters) deals with sexual sins and prohibitions. In part (I have inserted whole paragraphs to present an in context view):
19 You must not approach a woman in her menstrual impurity to have sexual intercourse with her. 20 You must not have sexual intercourse with the wife of your fellow citizen to become unclean with her. 21 You must not give any of your children as an offering to Molech, so that you do not profane the name of your God. I am the Lord! 22 You must not have sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman; it is a detestable act. 23 You must not have sexual intercourse with any animal to become defiled with it, and a woman must not stand before an animal to have sexual intercourse with it; it is a perversion.
Leviticus 20
9 “‘If anyone curses his father and mother he must be put to death. He has cursed his
father and mother; his blood guilt is on himself. 10 If a man commits adultery with his neighbor’s wife, both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death. 11 If a man has sexual intercourse with his father’s wife, he has exposed his father’s nakedness. Both of them must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves. 12 If a man has sexual intercourse with his daughter-in-law, both of them must be put to death. They have committed perversion; their blood guilt is on themselves. 13 If a man has sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman, the two of them have committed an abomination. They must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves. 14 If a man has sexual intercourse with both a woman and her mother, it is lewdness. Both he and they must be burned to death, so there is no lewdness in your midst. 15 If a man has sexual intercourse with any animal, he must be put to death, and you must kill the animal. 16 If a woman approaches any animal to have sexual intercourse with it, you must kill the woman, and the animal must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves.

These two passages are from the Torah, the first five books of the Old Testament. One can argue these are part of the Jewish or Mosaic Law and are therefore obsolete; in that case, general adultery, incest and bestiality are also permitted along with homosexual conduct. Or is that the point?

First Timothy 1 (written by that suspect Paul fellow)

8 But we know that the law is good if someone uses it legitimately, 9 realizing that law is not intended for a righteous person, but for lawless and rebellious people, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 sexually immoral people, practicing homosexuals, kidnappers, liars, perjurers – in fact, for any who live contrary to sound teaching. 11 This accords with the glorious gospel of the blessed God that was entrusted to me.

There is a note on the phrase ‘practicing homosexuals’ in verse 10 from the NET Bible: “…this term… ??se?????t?? states, “a male who engages in sexual activity w. a pers. of his own sex, pederast 1 Cor 6:9…of one who assumes the dominant role in same-sex activity, opp. µa?a???…1 Ti 1:10; Pol 5:3. Cp. Ro 1:27.” L&N 88.280 states, “a male partner in homosexual intercourse – ‘homosexual.’…It is possible that ??se?????t?? in certain contexts refers to the active male partner in homosexual intercourse in contrast with µa?a???, the passive male partner” (cf. 1 Cor 6:9). Since there is a distinction in contemporary usage between sexual orientation and actual behavior, the qualification “practicing” was supplied in the translation…”

First Corinthians 6 (also written by that questionable Paul)
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! The sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, passive homosexual partners, practicing homosexuals, 10 thieves, the greedy, drunkards, the verbally abusive, and swindlers will not inherit the kingdom of God. 11 Some of you once lived this way. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

This last passage strikes me an illuminating. Homosexuals are included in a list of sin categories which include heterosexual sexual sinners, idolaters, adulterers (distinct from ‘sexually immoral heterosexuals), thieves, greedy, drunkards, verbally abusive and swindlers. The phrase ‘verbally abusive’ is rather interesting. The NIV translates it as ‘slanderers’; I think ‘gossips’ might easily fit into the meaning. At any rate, people who say nasty things about others are lumped in with murderers, thieves and the sexually immoral (of any type).

The last verse in the paragraph implies a change of life in those reading the letter. “Some of you … lived… But you were washed… sanctified… justified…” So they were not just forgiven and allowed to continue; they changed their values and life-styles. The same implication applies to the sexually impure; they don’t do that sort of thing anymore; they avoid that sort of thing; they are ashamed of and denounce their own past behavior.

Therefore, the Old Testament writings prohibited homosexual conduct as does the writings of Paul, therefore the New Testament. The words used really do mean homosexual conduct and not just the generic ‘sexual misconduct’.

I’m really curious about the ‘equal scholarship’ which demonstrates what the Bible says isn’t what it means. I’d like to examine the line of thought and arguments.

The statement “…Jesus’ self-proclaimed Greatest Commandment to love one’s neighbor as one loves oneself” is incorrect and sloppy scholarship.

Matthew 22:
35 And one of them, an expert in religious law, asked him a question to test him: 36 “Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?” 37 Jesus 44 said to him, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ 38 This is the first and greatest commandment.

This tenet goes past ‘unfundamentalism’ and is squarely non-Christian.

8. It is much more reasonable—and certainly more compassionate—to hold that throughout history God chose to introduce himself in different ways into different cultural streams than it is to believe that there is only one correct way to understand and worship God, and that the punishment for anyone who chooses any but that way is to spend all of eternity having the living flesh seared off of his or her bones.

More reasonable? By who’s standard? As a Christian, the only viewpoint that counts is God’s viewpoint. That ‘viewpoint’ is expressed in the Bible, which is – as noted prior – God’s message to humanity.

More compassionate? To whom? Not to mention under what definition of ‘compassion’? I find no compassion in patting someone in error on the head and say comforting words while allowing them to remain in error at the risk of Eternal Death.

So let’s go along with the idea of God introducing Himself into different cultural streams in different ways. Why would introduce Himself in a totally different manner if He’s the same, Eternal God? For instance, in the sub-continent which is now India, why would God decide not to be the Eternal God of Creation of the Jewish people, but instead be represented by a pantheon of conflicting gods which change over time? Why would Almighty God manifest Himself as the volcano god, demanding virgin sacrifices? Would God happily change Himself into the Great Green Arkleseizure of Viltvodle VI?

Is He still God? Is He bored and just experimenting? Can He not remember who He is, from epoch to epoch?

The idea appeals to the ‘open-minded’ who have no ideas about who God is, or what He should be or do. The concept flies in the face of the ultimate creator of the Universe and all things that exist, who is Eternal and changeless, who is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent. In other words, God.

Again, not just ‘unfundamentalist’, but not very good thinking and doctrinally non Christian.

9. “No one comes to the Father except through me” does not mean that in the afterlife only Christians can get into heaven. It means that Jesus/God decides who does and doesn’t make it in.

From this one is forced to believe Jesus will not judge between those who accept Him and those who don’t, but instead will judge by ad hoc rules of ‘good behavior’. I say ‘ad hoc’ because no such rules are outlined in the Bible.

All that stuff about believing in the Son and relying on Him in tenet 1 are out the window, then? It is good deeds that really make the difference?

This heresy is remarkably old as well. It predates Christianity, in fact.

Jesus mentioned this concept in Matthew Seven, starting with verse 15:
15 “Watch out for false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are voracious wolves. 16 You will recognize them by their fruit. Grapes are not gathered from thorns or figs from thistles, are they? 17 In the same way, every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree is not able to bear bad fruit, nor a bad tree to bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 So then, you will recognize them by their fruit.
21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of heaven – only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. 22 On that day, many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, didn’t we prophesy in your name, and in your name cast out demons and do many powerful deeds?’ 23 Then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you. Go away from me, you lawbreakers!’
24 “Everyone who hears these words of mine and does them is like a wise man who built his house on rock. 25 The rain fell, the flood came, and the winds beat against that house, but it did not collapse because it had been founded on rock. 26 Everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. 27 The rain fell, the flood came, and the winds beat against that house, and it collapsed; it was utterly destroyed!”
So then, what about “… the one who does the will of my Father in heaven…”? John 15, starting with verse nine makes it clear:
9 “Just as the Father has loved me, I have also loved you; remain in my love. 10 If you obey my commandments, you will remain in my love, just as I have obeyed my Father’s commandments and remain in his love. 11 I have told you these things so that my joy may be in you, and your joy may be complete.”

Nowhere in the Bible, nowhere in the quotations of Jesus, nowhere in the letters of the various apostles and elders in Jerusalem is any such doctrine mentioned or taught. In one setting (John 10:14-18), Jesus says,
14 “I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me – 15 just as the Father knows me and I know the Father – and I lay down my life for the sheep. 16 I have other sheep that do not come from this sheepfold. I must bring them too, and they will listen to my voice, so that there will be one flock and one shepherd. 17 This is why the Father loves me – because I lay down my life, so that I may take it back again. 18 No one takes it away from me, but I lay it down of my own free will. I have the authority to lay it down, and I have the authority to take it back again. This commandment I received from my Father.”

Verse 16 is often used to ‘prove’ the heresy of various versions of God and or Jesus running about in human history, showing up in various forms and guises. One fellow seriously suggested it could indicate the existence of extra-terrestrial life. Actually, the statement simply indicates non-Jewish people were included. That’s all.

I personally don’t have any problem with extra-terrestrial life, or any of them being in Heaven. But it will be on the basis of an individual relationship with Jesus Christ.

I am also firmly convinced all the inhabitants of planet Earth will have adequate notice of the person and Deity of Jesus Christ. God is not the sort of being who looks for tiny excuses and ‘foot-faults’ to disqualify anyone from Heaven.

10. The question of whether or not hell is real is properly subsumed by the truth that a moment spent worrying if you’ll be with God in the afterlife is an opportunity missed to be with God in this life.

I agree. There is no point of wondering, let alone worrying, if Hell is real. Jesus talks about it too much to be in doubt. It isn’t pleasant, but it’s there. One is obliged to take note and do something to avoid residence.

11. God’s will and intention is to forgive and teach us, not to judge and punish us.

That is true, but only to a qualified extent. Jesus came to Earth as a mortal man to tell us what to do to avoid Eternal punishment and die in our place to pay the price for our sin. Obviously, God the Father was in on this plan as was the Holy Spirit.

God really does not want anyone to spend Eternity in Hell. However, since all mankind is in the default position of being in rebellion against God, mankind is by default condemned to Eternal Hell.

The words of Jesus in John, chapter three:
16 For this is the way God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world should be saved through him. 18 The one who believes in him is not condemned. The one who does not believe has been condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the one and only Son of God. 19 Now this is the basis for judging: that the light has come into the world and people loved the darkness rather than the light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For everyone who does evil deeds hates the light and does not come to the light, so that their deeds will not be exposed. 21 But the one who practices the truth comes to the light, so that it may be plainly evident that his deeds have been done in God.
God is loving and concerned. God is simultaneously honest and just. God is God and that means – in a long list of other things – He will always conduct Himself as God and be true to His own nature.

There are also a number of references warning that when Jesus returns – ‘The Second Coming’ – He will in fact judge all people according to their alliances.

12. The only person who should be actively endeavoring to convert non-Christians into Christians is God. Jesus does not need our help drawing people towards him. He does need, or could certainly use, our help in making sure that people know that they are, just as they are, loved.

This statement directly contradicts the command of Jesus.

Matthew 28:16-20
16 So the eleven disciples went to Galilee to the mountain Jesus had designated. 17 When they saw him, they worshiped him, but some doubted. 18 Then Jesus came up and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And remember, I am with you always, to the end of the age

Acts 1
6 So when they had gathered together, they began to ask him, “Lord, is this the time when you are restoring the kingdom to Israel?” 7 He told them, “You are not permitted to know the times or periods that the Father has set by his own authority. 8 But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the farthest parts of the earth.” 9 After he had said this, while they were watching, he was lifted up and a cloud hid him from their sight.

First Peter 3
15 But set Christ apart as Lord in your hearts and always be ready to give an answer to anyone who asks about the hope you possess. (“Hope” here meaning the expectation of Eternal life with God.)

So in this statement again, the concept is not ‘un-fundamentalist’ but ‘un-Christian’.

13. Getting a divorce is painful, and if at all possible should certainly be avoided. But ultimately the act in and of itself is not immoral.

This statement flatly contradicts Jesus’ teaching on the subject.

Matthew 5
31 “It was said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife must give her a legal document.’ 32 But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Matthew 19
3 Then some Pharisees came to him in order to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful to divorce a wife for any cause?” 4 He answered, “Have you not read that from the beginning the Creator made them male and female, 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and will be united with his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” 7 They said to him, “Why then did Moses command us to give a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her?” 8 Jesus said to them, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because of your hard hearts, but from the beginning it was not this way. 9 Now I say to you that whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another commits adultery.” 10 The disciples said to him, “If this is the case of a husband with a wife, it is better not to marry!”11 He said to them, “Not everyone can accept this statement, except those to whom it has been given. 12 For there are some eunuchs who were that way from birth, and some who were made eunuchs by others, and some who became eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who is able to accept this should accept it.”

So yes, Jesus said divorce is an immoral act, save for the cause of adultery. Even then, the divorced man or woman is limited in options.

14. God does not want any woman “submitting” to anyone.

Another direct contradiction of Biblical teaching.

Ephesians 5
22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord, 23 because the husband is the head of the wife as also Christ is the head of the church – he himself being the savior of the body. 24 But as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. 25 Husbands, love your wives just as Christ loved the church and gave himself for her 26 to sanctify her by cleansing her with the washing of the water by the word, 27 so that he may present the church to himself as glorious – not having a stain or wrinkle, or any such blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In the same way husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.

Colossians 3
18 Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. 19 Husbands, love your wives and do not be embittered against them.

Oh, wait! That’s that questionable Paul again! Since Paul is so very questionable, we can ignore much of his writings – especially the parts about moral conduct, sexual misconduct and general carryings-on.

First Peter 3
1 In the same way, wives, be subject to your own husbands. Then, even if some are disobedient to the word, they will be won over without a word by the way you live, 2 when they see your pure and reverent conduct… like Sarah who obeyed Abraham, calling him lord. You become her children when you do what is good and have no fear in doing so. 7 Husbands, in the same way, treat your wives with consideration as the weaker partners and show them honor as fellow heirs of the grace of life. In this way nothing will hinder your prayers.

That’s the summation of Peter the Apostle. He agrees with Paul the suspect.

15. There were no dinosaurs on Noah’s ark; Jesus didn’t have a pet stegosaurus. An all-powerful God and the theory of evolution are not incompatible.

Whooop! Whooop! Whooop! Strawman Alert!
So, just where do we find claims of dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark? Which gospel contains the story of Jesus and His pet stegosaurus? What kind of hairball ploy is this?

Okay, “An all-powerful God and the theory of evolution are not incompatible.” That part is reasonable enough. However, this isn’t a matter of doctrinal distinction; it’s a matter of textual examination.

Dinosaurs on the Ark? Sheesh.

16. The single most telling indicator of a person’s moral character has nothing to do with how they define or worship God, and everything to do with how they treat others.

So, a relationship with God isn’t important; what is important is ‘good deeds’.

Actually, this is a deceptive argument; somewhat strawman in nature. I’ll agree one’s ‘moral character’ is not always dependent on how one defines or worships God. However, one’s moral character has nothing to do with one’s Eternal estate, being in a proper relationship with God and spending Eternity with God in Heaven.

One can be a rotten skunk and be bound for Heaven, or a very decent, clean, honest and honorable person going to Hell.

I know for a fact that my moral character was – for that matter ‘is’ – not always as good and shining as it ought to be. After becoming a Christian, I have sinned grievously, often and cheerfully. But my eternal destination is already secure and in Jesus’ care. As far as God is concerned in Judgment, I am as pure as Jesus.

Which is not to say I’m content in my life that way, or at peace with God. I found I was a jittery, angry, depressed, unsettled maniac; at least some combination of two or three of those. I can hide it well, but it’s there and I am very aware of it.

What happens is this: God works on me to make me into who – the type of person – He wants me to be, fit for Heaven in Eternity.

To conclude:

“Un-fundamentalists” accept the Deity, Sacrifice, Resurrection and Redemptive nature and power of Jesus Christ. However, they also believe God has appeared in other forms and guises, seemingly revealing other versions of Himself. So Jesus really isn’t uniquely God at all.

“Un-fundamentalists” deny the Divinely Inspired nature of the Bible, strip Paul’s writing of authority and accept homosexual misconduct – and by inference, heterosexual misconduct – as both normal and moral.

“Un-fundamentalists” claim the goal of Christianity is to live a good life; ‘good’ being defined by not offending anyone, getting along with all and ignoring Biblical principles if adherence would cause a row.

“Un-fundamentalists” believe Christians should not vote in accordance with Biblical principles. Nor should laws follow the long held traditions of either Judaism or Christianity.

“Un-fundamentalists” do not assume responsibility for evangelism; in fact, evangelism is discouraged.

“Un-fundamentalists” believe God never criticizes or judges human conduct. They believe there is no Hell. After all, God isn’t going to punish anyone for anything anyway.

All things considered, “Un-fundamentalist Christian” is not a properly descriptive phrase. Citing the serious theological and doctrinal differences between this cult and mainstream Christianity, I would suggest perhaps “Nearly Christian” would be a better description. Since the first tenet does recognize Jesus as God, perhaps “Barely Christian” would do.

Now, I know some bright soul is going to jump on me with the Biblical injunction of “Judge not, lest ye be judged”. The statement comes in Matthew 7, starting with the beginning of the chapter. The whole paragraph reads as follows:

1 “Do not judge so that you will not be judged. 2 For by the standard you judge you will be judged, and the measure you use will be the measure you receive. 3 Why do you see the speck in your brother’s eye, but fail to see the beam of wood in your own? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye,’ while there is a beam in your own? 5 You hypocrite! First remove the beam from your own eye, and then you can see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye. 6 Do not give what is holy to dogs or throw your pearls before pigs; otherwise they will trample them under their feet and turn around and tear you to pieces.

This whole speech is addressed at being judgmental of other people in regard to their fitness or standing before God. I am not ‘judging’ any person, but a set of beliefs and how they measure up to Christianity, I am not violating any injunction. Indeed, I am following a warning given by John the Revelator in First John 4:

1 Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to determine if they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses Jesus as the Christ who has come in the flesh is from God, 3 but every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God, and this is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming, and now is already in the world.

So I am testing this ‘spirit’, this claim of revelation of God. I find interesting that tenet 1 claims to recognize Jesus as the Son of God in the Flesh, and then denies Jesus’ Deity in most of the subsequent tenets.

soulartemis #sexist incels.co

[RageFuel] Dumb idiot foids with sociology degrees use sex to get jobs and call STEM majors useless creepy virgins

Found a sociology forum with a massive number of foids who chose to major in sociology and have postgraduate degrees in sociology.
They always whine about not being able to find a job.

They use their more intelligent husbands to find job connections and get hired.

They call STEM majors "aspie creepy virgins," completely oblivious to the fact that as sociology majors, they're all dumb as fuck compared to STEM majors.

They call CS majors and app developers "useless," extremely hypocritical coming from them when they make a living writing papers about Plato and human sexuality.

They even talk about sucking the dick of their professors and bosses to get grants and promotions JFL WTF

If this isn't a career blackpill into the extremely tutorial mode lives of foids, I don't know what is.

”What is new here? All social ((((science)))) whores' main job is to scam money and grades by sucking dicks. Also same goes with most liberal arts departments. They are the most degenerates in any university campus. They spend 80% of their time on partying and rimming chads' buttholes in frat houses.

As a side note, a cockroach in the shitroom of a STEM department building can IQmog an entire faculty of liberal arts.”

True. Just imagine studying for a useless degree and accumulating debt that will never get payed off and still having the courage to call yourself smart in the end. Just fucking lol @ those cunts. They can walk, but decide to put themselves in wheelchairs and then they complain why they can't go up the stairs. They fail at Tutorial Mode.

Perfect analogy, then they complain about how they can't get a job and how they have all this debt, fucking stupid
then they have the nerve to call app developers useless when they're the ones writing papers about human sexuality and calling that a career.

Belt_Around_Ur_Neck #conspiracy reddit.com

Theory: Major Factions of TPTB have been at war for the past few years and that’s why we’re seeing so much come to light, spiritual awakenings, glitches in the matrix, etc.

Say what you will about the current USA prez, but my theory is that he (wittingly or unwittingly) was the catalyst for one faction of TPTB to try and wrest control from the other. Most of us believe this group runs the world through manipulation, disgusting blackmail scams, central banks, cruelty, and possibly worship of evil spirits. But why is it assumed these bastards always march in lockstep? These are the most depraved sociopaths on the planet. There has to be infighting, backstabbing, and scheming.

I’ve seen a lot of posts recently regarding spiritual awakenings, noticing that the “system” of infotainment and fake news propaganda is getting stale and repetitive as fuck lately. We have posts where the elite’s occult symbolism is dead smack in your face. Their sex predators are getting exposed and the deaths surrounding same (Epstein, that Kevin Spacey accuser) are such blatantly obvious cover-ups it’s ridiculous.

So my theory is that the last prez election in the US gave one faction an opening to try and take down the other, and the two sides have been furiously at war ever since. They likely follow a certain code or set of rules for this sort of thing so it all doesn’t collapse, but it seems like they as a group have gotten sloppy as fuck lately, and they seem to be losing their discipline.

And to those who believe that the elite are controlled/assisted by evil spirits, that we live in the Matrix or other type of soul trap, doesn’t it seem like the “glitches” are getting more frequent and obvious? Like the idea that the material universe as an elaborate sham seems more readily apparent?

Thoughts?

czakal #racist diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com

Eric the Merchant is back. This time, Kaufmann has been accused of being part of the “academic alt-right”. This is the same Jew who did A/B testing to find out which propaganda messages were most effective in persuading white people to accept their own racial extinction. He even coined a new term for the dispossession process, WhiteShift , and wrote a book about it,

The Jew has been accused of having Alt Right sympathies by a Turk called Umut Özkirimli. This Turk wrote a book called “Theories of Nationalism”, which I read years ago. It was a review of various theories of nationalism, nearly all of which described it as an artificial identity, constructed through propaganda, built on myths.

The Turk now lives in Sweden where he tells Swedes they don’t really exist. He hails from one of the most nationalistic countries in the world, whose people have carried out a murderous process of ethnic cleansing extending across centuries and continuing even today. He is unable to live among his own countrymen because he fears they might murder him. But if Europeans say they don’t want his countrymen to come and live in their countries because they fear they might murder them, that, in his view, is illegitimate. According to Magic Soil theory, the natural viciousness of his countrymen will be instantly dispelled as soon as they set foot in Sweden.

White Genocide is Real #racist christiannews.net

White supremacy is a myth, a false tale told by communist globalist Marxist liberal democrats on a mission to genocide white people in the very nation they founded.

White Supremacist = A White man that openly objects to his political dispossession and demographic replacement by the 3rd World Hordes in the nation forged out of a savage wilderness by his White Forefathers

“There are some things that must be said so that future generations will know that at least some of us were aware, and that our generation was not entirely composed of cowards and fools.” - Guillaume Faye

White is much more than skin colour. White refers specifically to the peoples of European Descent just as Blacks refer to those of African descent.

Whites (Europeans) are a distinct Caucasoid phenotype.

Whites are one people... One race with many different tribes people, just like blacks in Africa are of one racial group which make up many different tribes. A swede who marries a pole and has a child is not race mixing and committing racial suicide. When Whites mix their racial bloodlines with Blacks, Asians, Latinos or Indians that is racial suicide.

The reason why Whites in America have been reduced to using the term White Nationalism is because the American identity have been hijacked by ((( Marxists immigrant propaganda))) and non-whites think they can be included in the American Nation. They can't...one is born into a nation by blood. The American ethnicity was forged out of Europeans Stock. How did this happen...because Whites (Europeans) are cousins by blood.

If you're not White (European) you're not an American. A nation is blood. A nation is not an idea.

Genes =DNA=Blood...create culture. If all the races were the same and equal then we would all have the same culture. It's a lie and everyone knows it..we see the lie daily everywhere we look.

Civilizations do not die. They commit suicide and it is what we are witnessing throughout all of White Western civilization. Neither those in power nor the people think enough of their civilization to preserve it.

The masses have been (((brainwashed))) by the progressive canard of multiculturalism that all cultures are equal. If you think your culture isn’t better than another, then you have no reason to care if it is preserved and replaced by another.

Perfectibilist #racist #magick stormfront.org

8 reasons Scandinavians are the chosen people of science.

What is an Aryan?

Have you ever seen an ancient aryan? I know ONE family in all of Norway whose blonde hair is still Targaryen white well into adult age: Silvery-white blonde. (I am not talking about myself.) They have red cheeks, and an angelic heart of utmost purity. They cry, and hate evil, I tell you: These are simply not from this world. But this is perhaps the last we will see of pure angels. Yes. They are extinct. And the world will forget that such incredible purity of heart, and beauty ever existed. Entering into an age of wolves. But there once was hope. Aryans. Hitler believed the true Aryans could only be distinguished by their blonde hair, and blue eyes. A mother who birthed 10 blonde, blue-eyed children in would be rewarded with a medal from Der Fuhrer. It`s time for family planning and breeding! Perhaps we need a rabbit-god like Ashtar?

The chosen people… Have you ever seen a supreme-blonde, tall, broadshouldered Swede with a tiny, upright, foxy nose (swedes have the most beautiful noses on Earth) , and a noble forehead? Their faces are geometrically perfect. Of course they are the chosen people. At least of science.

With Aryan, I mean firstly the aryan race which I term Scandinavian, Germanic, and East-Russian. Preferably blondes. Secondly; an aryan is a person of heroic hearts, yet a peaceful nature filled with joy. You can be as blonde as you like, but if you listen to hateful music like rap/hip-hop, and carry yourself in an uncivilized manner: You are not an aryan.

9 reasons Aryans (like blonde Swedes) are the (God`s) ¨chosen people.¨

So let`s get to it!

1 Because Aryans are the most beautiful, slender people. Aryans are the most beautiful people on Earth, and their beautiful pink skin represents the love-gods which is white.

2 Because Aryans have the greatest variety. Whites have green eyes, blue eyes, red hair, brown hair, blonde hair, and white hair. The latter is dying out. They have curls, some have afro-tendencies, and other have straight hair. Aryans have by FAR the greatest variety of appearance. Aryans come in all varieties while all other races on the planet look similar to their own kin. This is distinct from all other races who only have black hair. Their blonde hair is sacred to the sun, and their blue eyes represents intellect: Peace, wisdom, and high spiritual awareness. They are thus God`s chosen people. Why? Because the scientific creator is the sun. And the sun is blonde.

3 Because of their great historical accomplishments. Aryans built the greatest architecture for two millennia, and preached Christianity (the true religion) , created humanism (human rights), philosophy, the civilized world, politics (Rome), revolution and the school-system (France Germany), the judicial system and the military institutions (Greece) etc, with some credit to the Jews who for the latter centuries have advanced in all science. But seriously; they`re all EUROPEAN Jews.

4 Because they are the most civilized people. Aryans have shaped a humanistic, peaceful civilization of equality, freedom, and civil rights unlike any other. The entire world owes the humanistic codes to the roman-christian Europe.
Scandinavians are the kindest, most empathic, peaceful, civilized people as statistics show; yet they are thus also EXTREMELY naiive, gullible, and cowardly. They simply cannot believe there is evil out to get them, or that evil exists at all! All statistics show whites, and especially native Scandinavians have extremely low crime statistics. In the case of rape, we are ten times better than immigrants throughout all Scandinavia. Ten times! In all Nordic countries. And still: We are so civilized we actually love our open borders. <3 Aryans are among the most peaceful, naive, non-aggressive people on Earth statistically.

5 Because Aryans among the most intelligent races. Native Scandinavians whom are the most beautiful and peaceful humans statistically on Earth has historically had the highest iq of Europeans back in the days; even as intelligent as the Chinese, and Japanese who are the most intelligent people today after Askenazi Jews. (the latter which aren`t a nation-bound race, but a mix)

6 Because are the most spiritually gifted. Both positively and negatively. (Alas.) Whites have dominated the realm of Magick, and the royal houses from Egypt to the druidic orders of England. There is a lot of demonic blood in the white race. But not in the blondes.
Blonde angelic aryans are more spiritually aware because of their loving, peaceful nature, and have a high aura-field-conscience than any other race as they are alien, and part interdimensional. As I am. This is the most pivotal point on my list. They can connect with higher realms of angelic purity, which the other races can`t. They connect to the higher heavens which are populated by blonde angels. To be able to venture forth in dreams, and see these dimensions; you return, and realize you are an angel with wings; a totally different species, as you have seen that your blonde race originate from universes far beyond earthly beauty and purity. I am of course talking about Alvarheim. The spiritual dimension above Norway/Scandinavia.
Only pure blondes can connect to these angelic degrees of purity and conscienceness. Some are very holy, but many have fallen into carnalism of the 21st century, and forgotten about their spiritual origin from the Heavenlies. The blonde remnants are fading, and the glory of Hyperborea, Thule, Greece, Rome, and Atlantis is fading. I would compare myself to a eagle who can look directly into the sun, while other races are terrestrial, and can only experience Earethern life and conscience. After all: It the aryans who created the Hindu mystery schools.

7 Because the original aryans were aliens. If an alien came to Earth to examine all races, he would certainly pick out the tall, peaceful, orderly, non-hairy, blonde or red-haired, blue-eyed, beautiful, intelligent broad-shouldered aryan with milky-smooth skin. Just like myself. �� He would come from the Pleiades looking for his long lost family. An angelic brother with peaceful divine conscience.

8 Because Most aryans have way above world-average penis size. Iceland has f.i a WHOPPING 16.51 cm as average: only 1.5 cm shorter than the world nr.1, Congo in Africa. Today: Iceland in nr 9 on the list of the world`s most intelligent countries; even after taking in immigrants for 30+ years, and is a major competitor in sports in spite of its tiny population.

9 Because we are the best physical athletes, or at least the most tenacious. Norway, a tiny nation of only 6 million hardy Vikings - statistically wins the most medals in athletic (curling not counted) winter sports out of all nations for about 50 years. And in the last 2018 winter Olympics: Norway got the most golds, AND the most medals in general out of ALL nations in ALL disciplines, not only athletic disciplines. (!!!) We have the world record of getting the most medals, and most golds in winter Olympics through history!!! Even while Norway only has a population of 6 million. And that makes tiny Norway`s Vikings the best country at sports in the world_by_quite a lot really. An very credible insider in the shadow military also told me Norway has the world`s nr.1 special-force troop in the world. And THAT is incredible, because that competition is tougher than sports. There are statistics to this as well. But this troop was very unofficial. Why are they the best? They are wolves I tell you. Survival of the fittest through thousands of years in the harsh snow-covered lands produced a strong breed.

Spiritually, physically, behavior-wise, and quite arguably intellectually as well: True aryan Scandinavians are the best.

Sandy Hook truthers, et al #conspiracy seattletimes.com

Amazon reviews hijacked by causes, conspiracies, rage

Organized groups are using the Amazon review system to push political and social agendas often only tangentially related to the products being sold.

Most book authors know they need to endure critics, even comments that may be malicious and personal.

But the venom that runs through more than three dozen reviews on Amazon.com of Scarlett Lewis’ latest book are particularly scathing.

“This Scarlet Lewis person is a real sick human being,” writes one reviewer named Kevin.

“Scarlett Lewis is a fraud and a sellout to all of humanity,” writes another, anonymously.

“Scarlett Lewis is a lying traitor,” writes a reviewer named David Weiss.

Those reviews might suggest that Lewis is a polemic politician, treasonous spy or scurrilous financier. She’s none of these. Lewis is the mother of Jesse Lewis, a 6-year-old boy who was murdered at Sandy Hook Elementary School three years ago.

She wrote “Nurturing Healing Love: A Mother’s Journey of Hope and Forgiveness” to describe her journey after the massacre and help others choose love and forgiveness instead of anger and resentment in their darkest moments.

The rage in those reviews is fueled by the conspiracy theory that the Sandy Hook shootings were a hoax, perpetuated by the government to push for tougher gun-control laws. Several were posted after a YouTube user who goes by the handle “RadMc02” uploaded a video on Oct. 18 encouraging viewers to “Truth Bomb the Shit Out of Amazon Reviews!”

Reviewers have long used Amazon as a platform to vent about products that failed to live up to their expectations. Some have even used it to attack authors whose views differ from their own.

Increasingly, though, people are launching coordinated campaigns to push political and social agendas through negative reviews often only tangentially related to the product for sale. They are able to do so because Amazon welcomes reviews regardless of whether the writer has actually purchased the product.

Lewis isn’t the only target of the Sandy Hook tragedy deniers. “We want to hit this woman as hard as we can,” says a narrator in a YouTube video as he walks viewers through posting 1-star ratings and negative reviews for “Choosing Hope: Moving Forward from Life’s Darkest Hours,” by Sandy Hook Elementary first-grade teacher Kaitlin Roig-DeBellis. The video, posted by “Peekay22,” even guides viewers to click a “Yes” button indicating they found other negative reviews helpful.

Since Peekay22’s video posted on Oct. 16, “Choosing Hope” has received more than 170 1-star reviews out of just over 250 total reviews. That’s tanked the book’s rating down to 2.1 stars out of 5.

“Amazon is giving these people a forum … ,” Lewis said. “Obviously, Amazon should remove (the reviews).”

But Amazon appears to have no intent of doing so. To the company, as long as the reviews are “authentic,” they have a place on its website.

“All authentic reviews, whether the reviewer bought the product on Amazon or not, are valuable to customers, helping them make informed buying decisions every day,” Amazon spokesman Tom Cook wrote in reply to questions about its review policy. He declined to address questions about specific reviews.

Critics long welcome

Amazon’s reviews system has long been a source of pride for Chief Executive Jeff Bezos. In his 2003 letter to shareholders, Bezos crowed about ignoring critics who wondered why the company would allow negative reviews that might discourage shoppers from buying products on Amazon’s site.

“Though negative reviews cost us some sales in the short term, helping customers make better purchase decisions ultimately pays off for the company,” Bezos wrote.

Still, Amazon has cracked down on some bogus reviews. Earlier this month, it filed a suit — the second this year — against reviewers who post positive product evaluations in exchange for payment from third-party sellers on the site.

“We continue to use a number of mechanisms to detect and remove the small fraction of reviews that violate our guidelines,” the company said after filing the most recent suit. “We terminate accounts that abuse the system and we take legal action.”

But Amazon doesn’t view coordinated campaigns to flood its review system with negative comments as abuse.

“We terminate accounts that abuse the system and take the appropriate legal action, whether it’s a 1- or 5-star review,” Cook, the Amazon spokesman, wrote. “The issue isn’t whether the reviews are negative or positive, it’s whether they are authentic or not.”

Forum for activists, too

It’s not just angry conspiracy theorists who use Amazon’s review system to air their views. Grass-roots political activists have figured out how to turn Amazon.com into a bullhorn as well.

A year ago, PepsiCo launched a new mid-calorie soda called Pepsi True exclusively on Amazon. That caught the attention of activists at the Rainforest Action Network and SumOfUs, who have condemned PepsiCo for its use of so-called “conflict palm oil,” the harvesting of which is causing deforestation, in its snack products such as Doritos.

The two groups decided to target Pepsi True through Amazon’s review system because they knew it was a low-cost way to make a high-impact statement. SumOfUs called for a “Pepsi True Amazon.com takeover!” on its Facebook page, and the Rainforest Action Network called on its Twitter followers to “Join in” the effort.

And it worked. Nearly 4,000 followers gave Pepsi True 1-star ratings and posted negative reviews that, among other things, ripped Pepsi for supporting “rain forest destruction by buying unsustainable palm oil.” Pepsi was caught so off-guard that it asked Amazon to take down the page.

“We totally sabotaged their product launch,” said Laurel Sutherlin, a Rainforest Action Network spokesman.

Pepsi, which eventually decided to revive the product page despite the negative reviews, said in a statement that Pepsi True was “subject to an orchestrated effort to post inaccurate information” about the company’s palm-oil policy. A spokeswoman declined to comment beyond the statement.

Even one of Amazon’s own products has been targeted by a coordinated, agenda-driven campaign. Greenpeace has long criticized Amazon’s lack of transparency regarding the type of energy it uses to power the massive data centers that run its cloud-computing business, Amazon Web Services.

Greenpeace brought that concern to last year’s debut of Amazon’s Fire Phone, launching an email campaign that encouraged users to post negative reviews and leave 1-star ratings on Amazon’s own website.

Gary Cook, Greenpeace’s senior IT analyst, said the group stopped counting reviews related to its environmental concerns after the number reached 1,500.

“We got an overwhelming response,” he said. “People enjoyed having the opportunity to talk to Amazon where it lives.”

While the Fire Phone failed on its own, the Greenpeace-prompted comments — including “Make a ‘smarter’ phone supported by clean, renewable energy!” from IT-Berater — remain on the site.

These campaign-driven negative reviews may promote agendas, but they often add little to the discussion about the product itself. That’s because the vast majority of reviewers responding to those calls-to-action have never used the products they are critiquing, a point they often acknowledge in their reviews. In the process, those reviews often overwhelm comments from customers who have read the book or used the product.

Rainforest Action Network’s Sutherlin believes removing reviews would limit the expression of opinions. But Amazon has always retained the right to control the information posted on its site. Its “General Review Creation Guidelines” include plenty of restrictions, including barring reviews with “profanity or spiteful remarks,” as well as “advertisements, promotional material or repeated posts that make the same point excessively.”

It would be hard to argue that some of the posts about Scarlett Lewis aren’t spiteful. And the very purpose of these coordinated campaigns is to make the same point excessively so as to drown out positive appraisals. Amazon’s Cook declined to respond to questions about the company’s process for determining if reviews violate its guidelines and how they are taken down.

One way to stifle the coordinated outrage would be to limit reviews to those who have actually purchased the product they want to evaluate on Amazon. The company already lets shoppers filter reviews by “Verified purchase only,” though that’s not the default. Sutherlin acknowledges that such a limit would have made the campaign against Pepsi True impossible.

“I doubt that most people weighing in would buy the product,” Sutherlin said.

“System is creaking”

But don’t expect Amazon to make that change. Cornell University science and technology professor Trevor Pinch, who has studied Amazon’s review system, said the company benefits from as many shoppers posting on its site as possible.

“The reason Amazon cannot just use verified reviews is simple. Most of the content at the site is from free customer reviews, and it would mean it would lose most of its content,” Pinch said.

And while some of those reviews are spiteful, repetitive and off-topic, the vast majority are not.

But Pinch also cautions that coordinated campaigns of negative reviews, as well as bogus paid-for positive reviews, can’t help but take a toll on the system’s credibility.

“These are signs that the whole system is creaking,” Pinch said. “As cases of abuse mount up, it does lead to more distrust.”

For her part, Scarlett Lewis is living her book’s message of compassion and understanding. She refuses to be upset by the hateful reviews or Amazon’s decision not to remove them.

“Once you’ve had a child murdered, shot in the forehead, there’s not a lot that can ruffle your feathers,” Lewis said.

Whisper of Sadness #sexist incels.co

[Story] This is how easy it is for Chad (WARNING)

So back when I was at college before corona happened...

I live in this small dorm at the school. Top floor of the building so I use the elevator. Floor is entirely girls except for me and and 1 other dude. (~15 girls and 2 dudes on this floor). Im incel so this ratio doesn't matter (all the chicks are pretty ugly though so its not too hard to cope). Other guy on the floor... total fucking chad. Looks really similar to Timothée Chalamet except 6'2.

Our dorm has communal dinners and each of the floors sits with each other. This means I actually get to talk with Chad a lot as we have dinner and are the only 2 dudes on the floor and our rooms are right across from each other. Hes chill and nice to me thank god.

Okay now that you know the environment, here's the story. Its a Thursday night, around 1:30 am. Im up as usual celing. I have to leave my room and go to the ground floor to fill up my water bottle. I go to the elevator and click the button. When the elevator comes up guess who's on it... Chad, only he has a literal 8-9/10 Stacie with him on the elevator. He says sup to me and they both walk out and towards his room. After witnessing this suifuel, I barely manage to go and get my water and make it back to my room.

The next day at dinner Im sitting with Chad. We are just talking normally and he says "hey I remember seeing you last night". Im like yeah you did. He tells me "last night was absolutely crazy bruh" and then proceeds to tell me his whole night. Apparently he had gone out to a frat party with some of his friends and they had ditched him because he met a girl there. He said he ended up just making out and then left to go find his friends at another party. While on the way to the other party, he said a girl came up to him and started talking to him. This was the 8-9/10 he brought home....

He said it went like this "she came up to me and asked me if i was the guy from one of her classes last semester. I said yeah i think I remember you to." Then they started talking and ended up walking back to his place (our dorm). Then he went on to tell me that they fucked. But guess what? She was also a virgin and bled on his bed.... (and btw this chad has said that condoms are a joke and that he never uses them). Now the craziest part to him was that he had not talked to this girl once the entire semester when they were in class together. I legit told chad "thats cool bro" with this face

Just imagine having a life like this

TLDR - Chad in my dorm fucked a 9/10 virgin that approached him after JUST seeing him in class last semester. (He literally never talked to her until she approached him JFL)

no read but i agree

Not even the TLDR?

good spare yourself

This makes me want to rope. Virgin girls are rarer than diamonds and your roommate got to fuck one! Women only save their virginity for Chad.

Im not even joking I was shaking the entire rest of the day after hearing it from him. I was trembling with feels

wont read for my sanity

For the best tbh, this was a nuclearblackpill experience

There's literally no way she's an 8-9

Im dead serious she was easily 8-9/10 I actually remember chad even said she was the hottest girl in the class

And she was a virgin

Absolute suifuel

and he fucked her raw

god mode activated for this young Chad,

all chad had to say (it's just you, the girls show up)

literally just existed and she wanted to fuck

Fabian Fjälling #wingnut #conspiracy #racist freewestmedia.com

Sweden’s Decaying Democracy – More Like Communist Romania without the Torture

A journalist is arrested and dragged out of the Gothenburg Book Fair because he politely asked a powerful politician… the wrong questions about his support for the ethnically-cleansed Zimbabwean dictatorship. Not only journalists, but academics and bloggers are being hounded by the leftist establishment daily. And they have all the nasty instruments of the state at their disposal. Citizen reporter Fabian Fjälling looks into their excesses.

The Swedish regime and its media have always promoted the idea that Sweden is the role model for freedom and democracy. The Swedish people have slowly and subtly been manipulated into a position where the Swedes themselves act like Pavlovian dogs who start barking as soon as their master plays the racist or Nazi card. In fact, the regime never needed to pass their many laws on what kind of speech is permissible or not, and which political parties should be taking part in Sweden’s so-called democracy.

Sweden has many laws against alleged hate speech, which are regularly trotted out any time someone dares to stand up for the Swedish people. For the most part however, Swedes have sadly been brainwashed into suppressing free speech themselves. In some mysterious way, the general sentiment has for a long time been that if you – being a Swede – stand up for white indigenous Swedes, you are assumed to want to kill anyone who does not fit that description.

The situation in the country is almost like a severe form of brainwashing, or Monarch programming, where the master can induce the victim to inflict severe injuries upon him or herself. In Sweden, the programming has been applied to a whole nation.

A Romanian I spoke to compared Sweden to Romania in the fifties. That was a time when such infamous facilities such as the Pieteshti and Gherla torture centers were used to programme a whole generation of intellectuals. This was done in order to create the perfect communist citizen in a communist utopia. My Romanian friend was astonished to learn that the Swedish regime has accomplished what the Romanian Bolshevists had so keenly desired, but without using torture.

Recently, Swedish alternative media has gained a huge audience, and this is even more surprising since the regime has done all in its power to suppress its advances. Truth is slowly penetrating the bubble in which the nation is being held captive. Swedes are starting to realize that the obsolete mainstream media has been shaping their world view, and that this old media has been far from neutral.

They have started to understand that there are a number of very important questions which are never asked by the obsolete media. Pervasive still, however, are the social stigma and informal repression of people who ask questions along the lines of: “Do Swedes exist as a people?”

Or: “What will the long term effect be on life for the Swedish people if their country is filled with third world immigrants?”

Or: “Are immigrants from Somalia really a badly needed asset for Sweden, and if so, are they not more needed in Somalia?”

The social stigma and informal repression that follow when posing such questions force many alternative journalists and thinkers to publish under pseudonyms. If an alternative media journalist is doxed, there is a very high risk that he or she will get fired. After that no one will employ “the racist” to avoid bad publicity for the company.

Still, some media outlets have chosen to fight the battle in Sweden head-on. On a shoestring budget, while making intelligent moves, they manage to expose the emperor’s pretence of being clad. The newspaper Nya Tider [New Times] is one example.

[…]

The Nya Tider journalist managed to find the former top diplomat, Social Democrat Pierre Schori (pictured), who has on several occasions openly supported the genocidal Zimbabwean leader Robert Mugabe. In all his career, Schori had only ever been interviewed by leftist liberals. Being faced with questions from a conservative angle made him completely lose his composure as is evident from the video. At the end, one sees the reporter eventually being arrested by police. His crime was asking questions, as he never once touched the former politician.

It’s therefore official: Sweden is a police state where journalists are arrested if they ask questions that make the regime look bad. The task of the mainstream media in Sweden is to make Sweden look nice abroad. The functionaries of the regime are to be portrayed as the great beloved leaders, no matter how many people are shot or blown to pieces in the escalating gang violence that the regime has imported.

[…]

{Submitter’s note: The original article mentions many more ‘cases’. See the source link if you’d like to see them.}

Mr. Coulter #fundie godorscience.com

[In responce to an article about a town using, among other things, hog manure to generate their own energy. A fundie who happens to be a pig farmer responds with a bizarre post.]

Is this some way of saying that me and the piggies are going to be the heros of the energy crisis? Well, well, well.

Here you go WD, we can now use the theory of evolution to solve the energy crisis! So now the theory of evolution is not about evolution, but a TRUTH on aiding the energy crisis. This is how the simple pig farming thesis/process will work. First, I will have all theory of evolution gibbergabber mailed to me. Second, I will feed it to the piggies. Third, I will let those theories "evolve"(get it evolve) into pigshit. And I(well not "I", the deep bowels of the piggies) even got it to go from one form of existance into another, how sweet is that! Where are those pesky creationist now! Huh?! We dont hear one word from them, humph figures. We (pig farmer and science) have proven the "theory of evolution" does exist, and how "theory of evolution" emerged from a gob of goo(in this case pigshit) and evolved(I will make sure evolve/evolution get full credit) into energy/fuel. GOD?! HA! INDEED! Well GOD may have created the pig and man, but where was He when the "theory of evolution" evolved into pigshit? HMMM? How about you, confused? Me and WD just theorized an idea into an absolute truth. Cant forget the Fourth process, then we convert the pigshit into fuel and solve the pinch at the gasoline tank. WOW!

Does this make me a *sniff*, dare I say, a a a scientist?! OR maybe if this thesis pans out, a Doctor. I'll even let the Chinese beauties call me Docker. Dr.Mr. Coulter, and I did not even go to college. I can use my new fortune to finance a phD course at the local community college, I will target the poor and minorities of course. We will have basic readin', writin', and rithmaticin' ciriculum to give us validation, you know. WE will have advanced degrees in shredding the "theories of evolution", litteraly shredding with a paper shredder, so the pigs can easily consume them. And whittling, gots to do sumptin while them pig bowels are evolutioning. And of course the proper pronuciation in hollaring "sue ee". Let me demonstrate, it is not "sue ee", no, no. It is "Sue EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!" "Comes and git yer theories!" Just think, with Dr. liscences more easily attainded, when those libbys come and profess gibbergabber with their elite educational credentials, we can have an army respond with "Nah uh" and flash their Dr. badge. Also, proper pumping of poo will have to be taught. From now on the poo truck will no longer be called the "honey wagon", no sir. It is now officially the "MONEY WAGON"! Hey, hey bling, bling. Oh, and for those who are too lazy to complete the semester it takes to become a doctor, we can have a 2 nit seminar on becoming a scientist by teaching folks how to feed "theories of evolution" to pigs. If the pompous educational field raises a stink(get it) with them being credited as scientists, we will graduate them as evolutionists. The Christianity will be taught free of charge.

Yes, and when you cruise the Illinois countryside with your $0.25/gallon gasoline and you get a whiff from that south wind, you can now be proud! For that whiff is the "theory of evolution" evolving into TRUTH. Now Jerry, WD we are in an alliance. The Christian Evolutionists! Ta da!

Kevin Riley O'Keefe #fundie thephora.net

An Open Letter to Professor Mark Ellis

by Kevin Riley O'Keeffe


Greetings: I recently read of your contention (popular in today's academic climate) that race is a "social construct." Allow me to suggest that this is a positively ludicrous notion, based entirely on the desire for it to be true on the part of the multiculturalist political left, rather than anything remotely akin to the objective fact that contemporary academia would have us believe.

Virtually all mammalian species (I'm generously assuming you don't regard species as a "social construct") consist of several subspecies. While it's possible that homo sapiens could be one of the rare exceptions, the fact that we are all aware of the existence of these other human subspecies (which, from our naturally sapien-centric view, we tend to refer to as "races," rather than as subspecies) argues rather definitively that we are not such an exception. The idea that you sincerely believe some Congolese cannibal is not a member of a different subspecies from a Swede, or even a Persian or Korean, is laughable, assuming you are not under the thrall of some corrupt religious dogma which requires you to say so, much as Hindus are required to abstain from eating beef.

Religion is all well and good, in so far as it pleases one to adhere to it, and if one wishes to gyrate before an idol of Ba'al, or pray to Jesus, or to believe in racial egalitarianism or some other such superstitious mumbo-jumbo, that is of course one's right. However, to use one's position as a professor of geography (a field, it should be noted, not generally associated with sweeping pronouncements on human physiology) to contaminate the minds of America's young people with one's own personal religious delusions/beliefs, is a terrible crime against truth, moral decency, and the survival of Western Civilization and its Europid creators.

Please keep your seemingly deranged religious views to yourself and try actually being the professor of geography you claim to be, rather than a proselytizer for the multiculturalist civic religion that is currently in the process of eroding everything we have created in the last 5,000 years. If an appeal to your sense of honor is ineffective, then perhaps you should take note of the fact that you are still a rather youngish-looking man and that the current regime is unlikely to last forever. Patriots have long memories, and the American government isn't much more stable than the Soviet regime was 20 years ago, as such extra-Constitutional, fascistic measures as the laughably named "USA Patriot Act" make quite clear. If you continue to commit crimes through the poisoning of the minds of our community's young people, the next regime may feel it necessary for you to be placed on trial for treason, and I or someone very much like me, may well be your judge or prosecutor. I respectfully but adamantly suggest you cease hiding behind academic freedom and the First Amendment in order to continue practicing the psychic equivalent of child molestation, i.e. the deliberate spiritual and intellectual pollution of the minds and souls of our young men and women.

Sincerely,

Kevin Riley O'Keeffe of San Jose, California

Unknown author #fundie mcknowledge.info

The Vedic civilization, according to the ancient scriptures, was at a much higher level of development than our modern society. In Sanskrit “veda” means knowledge. So what kind of knowledge are we talking about? From the standpoint of current evolutionary theory, the human race is supposed to be at the top of the society development. However, according to the Vedic literature, in a distant past there have been civilizations in the world, the greatness of which we cannot even imagine. A detailed study of the Vedic texts was held in Bombay in 1975.

It was a scientific “explosion” in physicist circles when the scientists have discovered the vivid description of subatomic level in the Vedas written some five thousand years ago. For example, it is stated in the Bhagavata Purana: “The material manifestation’s ultimate particle, which is indivisible and not formed into a body, is called the atom – Param anuh. It exists always as an invisible identity, even after the dissolution of all forms. The material body is but a combination of such atoms, but it is misunderstood by the common man. ” (Bhagavata Purana 3.11.1) In the same Bhagavata Purana the different time scales are explained, starting with the atomic. The theory of relativity and quantum physics can be substantially supplemented by information from the Sanskrit texts. Aryans were well aware of such concepts as superconductivity, nuclear and plasma weapons not to mention electricity.

The Mahabharata, an ancient historical epic, describes the use of nuclear weapons as follows: “It was as if all the nature’s forces have been suddenly unleashed. Something dazzling like the sun revolved in circles. Burned with a heat of this weapon, the world was staggering, as in a fever. Elephants caught fire from the heat and rushed wildly hither and thither in search of protection from the terrible power. Water in the sea turned hot, the animals were dying, the foes were killed and trees were falling in rows under the fury of the forest fire. Elephants blew their trunks fiercely and fell dead on the ground. Horses and chariots were burned on the spot. Thus, thousands of enemy chariots were destroyed, and then deep silence descended on the sea. Wind began to blow and the earth shined. It was a terrible sight. The corpses of the fallen were mutilated by terrible heat so that they no longer resembled people. Never before have we seen such a terrible weapon and did not hear about it. ” (Drona-parva)

The Vedic texts contain a large number of descriptions of different types of weapons, ranging from primitive stone throwing slings (sarvatobhadra), wall smashing mechanisms (udghatima), to all sorts of high velocity dart throwing devices (yantra-sara), and ending with weapons which damaging force does not have modern analogues. The tenth canto of Bhagavata Purana describes the various battles with weapons of extraordinary power. Those battles were fought by our ancient ancestors inhabited the planet, as well as representatives from other worlds. “… Then demon Bhaumasura immediately released the fire weapon, known as shatagnhi, by which he could kill hundreds of soldiers with one stroke.” (Bhagavata purana 10.59.15) There were weapons similar to raging nature’s forces. “… He (Vasudeva) contaracted brahmastra with another brahmastra, and the air weapon – with the mountain weapon”.

So on one side they used the “vayavya-astra” weapon, causing severe hurricane on the battlefield, and in order to counteract it the opposite side immediately used the so-called ” mountain weapon ” which just like a mountain could block the air flow and eliminate it completely. The weapon “shiva-jvara” is described as heat, which is twelve times more powerful than heat of the sun, and the weapon “narayana-jvara” represents the unbearable cold. “By that time, almost all the warriors of Shalva were killed, but when he saw that Vasudeva has arrived on the battlefield, he set in motion a terrible weapon of extraordinary power, which flew with a roar in the sky like a giant meteor. It shone with a dazzling, illuminating the sky… “ It is obvious that our ancestors were much more highly developed than we are today. Comparing to them we look like babies, at least in technical terms. “ It was not an easy task to enter into the city of Prajyotisha-pura, because it was very well fortified. First of all, there were four formidable forts guarding the four directions of the city, and it was well-protected on all sides by formidable military strength. The next boundary was a water canal all around the city, and in addition the whole city was surrounded with electric wires. The next fortification was of anila, a gaseous substance. After this, there was a network of barbed wiring constructed by a demon of the name Mura.” (Bhagavata Purana, 10 canto)

It appeared that the city was well-protected even in terms of today’s scientific advancement. In Vedic literature there are many references to flying saucers. In general, they are called the vimana. Vimanas in the Vedas are divided into two categories: 1) the mechanical machines, similar to airplanes and flying with wings like a bird; 2) and very complex machines that can not be precisely classified, which had unlimited possibilities. Machines of the first category are described mainly in medieval writings in Sanskrit, along with other various automatic devices and military machines. For example, Bhoja describes an aircraft made of lightwood, which looked like a bird with two wings. The driving force of the apparatus was generated in the fire chamber with mercury, installed on it, as well as flapping wings of the machine.

The devices of the second category are described in ancient books, such as the Rig Veda, the Mahabharata, Ramayana and Puranas, and their description in many ways are similar to modern descriptions of UFOs. The main work in Sanskrit, which includes the classification of ships of all kinds, is called Vimanika-shastra. This work also reveals all sorts of technologies that are known today, such as telephone and television, though, working on an entirely different, unknown to today’s science principles.

Here’s how the vimanas are described in the Ramayana: “The ship of Rakshasa king (type of demonic creatures) Ravana was amazing. Its walls were glittering, incrusted with diamonds, and the windows were skillfully decorated with gold. The ship could fly in any trajectory, regardless of wind direction, subject only to request of a pilot. He could stand still in the sky at any height, resembling a great shining mountain. The ship had a symmetrical design; the towers of the great artistic work were completed with domes, like mountain peaks. The viman could change its appearance through a variety of devices. After landing, it could camouflage itself as a mountain, lit up by the risen moon. Inside this beautiful spaceship resembled a palace with halls, rooms, swimming pools, etc.”

When we think of our ancestors, according to modern tradition, the image suggests a primitive ape-man with a hefty cudgel in his hands. However, the Vedic descriptions paint a different picture: “I have heard that Visvavasu, the great Gandharva (type of celestial singers), his mind stupefied with infatuation, fell from his airplane after seeing your daughter playing with a ball on the roof of the palace – harmya-prishthe, for she was indeed beautiful with her tinkling ankle bells and her eyes moving to and fro.” (Bhagavata Purana 3.22.17)

It is understood that not only at the present moment but in those days also there were skyscrapers. Herein we find the word harmya-prishthe. The literal translation of the word “harmya” is “a very high palace.” Svad vimanat means “from his own airplane.” It is suggested that private airplanes existed several thousand years ago. There are even descriptions of the whole flying cities, spreading for several square miles. For example, Hastinapura – a moving city, was well armed and protected against external enemies… Mathematics, mechanics and related engineering discipline could be raised to a new level thanks to the Vedic scriptures. In Sanskrit, a machine is called “yantra” which is explained in the Vedic literature as “a device that controls and directs the movement of objects in accordance with their characteristics.”

There are many types of yantras. A simple example might be a taila-yantra – the wheel, pushed by a bull in circles for oil pressing from seeds. Technical devices and machines of the ancient Aryans still amaze us with the level of their engineering skill. There are many plausible descriptions of robots, which were kept at the royal palaces, such as singing and dancing birds, resembling the living ones, clocks with moving figures, and various astronomical models, showing the motion of the planets. There were robots designed in the form of male and female figures that performed various functions. They were made mostly of wood, but perfectly covered with humanlike skin. Their motions were provided by the system of bolts, iron rods, springs and grooves. These figures played musical instruments, served drinks to guests and did other similar services. Yantrapurusha or man-machine could behave exactly like a real human. It is described in Bhagaya-vastu how an artist visited home of the yantracharya, or a teacher of mechanical engineering. There he was met by a robot-girl who washed his feet and had a resemblance of a real person until he realized that she was unable to speak. However, it is known that there were even speaking and absolutely fantastic sounding robots.

Are we able now, with all our modern science and computer technology, to repeat a similar level of inventive skill? Can we believe that the technical progress, as it is described in the Vedas, has really existed on Earth? Are Sanskrit texts the only proof of greatness of that ancient civilization? In order to answer these questions, it would be sufficient to analyze briefly the most famous archaeological monuments of antiquity. For example, in Delhi there is a metal column, known worldwide as “a pillar of Indra.” For several millennia, it has resisted the influence of precipitation, with no trace of rust. The column is made of atomic iron, without admixture of carbon and sulfur at the molecular level. In our time, it is possible to reproduce such a perfectly pure iron only with the sputter coating technique in the outer space and only in small quantities. The height of “Indra’s pillar” corresponds to the three-storey house, in fact, the column goes under the earth for a few tens of meters. How did they do it, what mechanisms were used to produce this miracle?

In the Hari Bhakti Vilas, written by Sanatana Goswami, it is said: “As bell metal (bronze) is turned into gold when mixed with mercury in an alchemical process, so in that very way, by the process of proper initiation by a bona fide spiritual master – diksa vidhanena, a person becomes a brahmana.” (Hari Bhakti Vilasa 2.12) The Vedas can give us tremendous knowledge, both material and spiritual. The greatest culture of people, who could turn a simple bronze into gold, is definitely able to revive our morally degraded society and add great deal of value to our lives.

Samuel James #fundie samueldjames.net

[Samuel James not only thinks the sexual revolution is not only still going on, but that it is intentionally hurting women, and the only way a woman can be satisfied is being in a loving Christian marriage.]

To which I say: Yes! Traister is exactly correct. The Sexual Revolution’s marketplace is indeed brazenly anti-women. When sex is a public commodity, women and children always have the worst, least valuable shares. This isn’t a wrinkle of sexual revolutionism; it’s a feature.

But Traister doesn’t want to challenge the reigning sexual nihilism of her time. In fact, she wants to make clear to anyone who might misinterpret her that casual sex and hookup culture are by all means beautiful and good. “This is not pearl-clutching over the moral or emotional hazards of “hookup culture,” she quickly clarifies. “This is not an objection to promiscuity or to the casual nature of some sexual encounters…Having humiliating sex with a man who treats you terribly at a frat party is bad but not inherently worse than being publicly shunned for having had sex with him, or being unable to obtain an abortion after getting pregnant by him, or being doomed to have disappointing sex with him for the next 50 years.”

If that isn’t a perfect summary of the self-deluded state of the modern secular self, I don’t know what is. You can see Traister’s thought process working towards the obvious truth: That maybe a culture of casual and irrelevant sex lends itself to an erotic Darwinism where the powerful and energetic will subdue others. You can hear the beginnings of a profound dissatisfaction with the terms of the Sexual Revolution. But in the end it is all stamped out by the glitz of modern accessories to our individual autonomy. Having humiliating sex becomes better than not having enough sex. Being taken advantage of is not as bad as carrying a child. Evil is bad, but at least it’s not boring.

But Traister’s honesty betrays her worldview. Her observations of the inequalities of casual sex are more durable than her rote progressivism. Traister begins the piece, after all, quoting a fellow feminist’s story about a drunken, unsatisfying sexual experience she once had with a group of frat boys. The fellow writer consented and everything happened seemingly according to the rules. The problems start when she wakes up. “But in the morning, she wrote, ‘I feel weird about what went down.'” There you go. When the alcohol stops coursing and the bodies stop moving, all that’s left is the throbbing of the soul, even if through cultural re-education and indulgence all that the mind can muster is, “That was weird.”

Rebecca Traister writes from the front lines of the Sexual Revolution’s civil war. It’s a civil war between nature and rhetoric. The rhetoric says, “We’re all equal and entitled!” The nature says, “I am stronger and more important than you.” Sex in which women “don’t matter” isn’t a rotting leftover from the Puritans; it’s the fresh du jour of the Darwinian world outside the world of transcendence, meaning, love, beauty, devotion, and God. The chains of marriage and monogamy are loathed by the same culture that excels in sex trafficking, campus rape, and human consumerism.

Love One Another M #racist amren.com

RE: A 21-Year-Old American Boxer Likened to Floyd Mayweather Said He’d ‘Never Let a White Boy’ Beat Him

The only chance negros have against whites is physical sport. Any competition that requires brains, no negroes to be found in the top even middle rankings.
For example in chess, the best negroes rank in the world:

Carlsson, Pontus ranks # 1,332
Simutowe, Amon ranks # 1,781
Ashley, Maurice ranks # 1,967

They are absolutely not even close to having a chance of climbing into the top 100 best chess players in the world!
The negro brain is by genetics underpowered compared to the brain of the white man.
The clock of evolution of the negro brain has been stopped or on hold for hundreds of thousands of years, very likely 300K-500K years.

The very best of the negro chess players have ZERO chance of winning against the best white chess players. To help you understand it better if you don't know the game of chess, what are the chances of a tennis player ranked world #1,000 winning a match against Djokovich, Federer, Nadal etc best tennis players??? (only if the player comes injured, but that does not count anyway, since even a kid can beat a tennis player who can't walk.)

It would be too easy for a chess champion to say "I'll never let a black player defeat me", because everyone knows it's impossible, because there are none at that level.

Imagine the uproar in the media if a top white chess player says that?
He may well be banned in playing chess tournaments in the west.

Negroes are allowed to get away with their blatant and open racism against whites.

Alexander Cornswalled #fundie cornswalled.com

For ten years, Dennis Markuze has been issuing death threats to atheists, journalists, entertainers and scientists. The deranged, inarticulate and repetitive nature of these threats have long been attributed to a diseased mind. Despite a decade of death threats, the Montreal police, who have jurisdiction over this person, have taken NO action against him.

Why?

A closer look at this man reveals a perplexing blend of alleged Christian fundamentalism and a near worship of Nostradamus.

Despite repeated efforts to engage him in conversation and discussion he has never done anything but repeat the same template driven insanity. There has been no variation, no thought, no research. It's as if the writing of Dennis Markuze is a character, a facade, and a poorly executed one at that.

Why put up this facade? And why are the Montreal police, the police department for a very liberal area, so determined to ignore an alleged conservative who is out for liberal blood?

The answer is simple. My theory is that Dennis Markuze is not the deranged madman he pretends to be. If he really were as violent and bloodthirsty as he claims, why would he attend and atheist convention with a backpack capable of concealing a bomb and do nothing but run?

The answer is simple. David Mabus (Dennis Markuze) is a deep cover liberal whose goal is to mock conservatives and make us look like psychotic lunatics. I suspect the Montreal police are taking no action against him, not because they'd rather he snap and kill someone first, as they claim, but because they already KNOW he's an act. The only rational reason for the Montreal police to take no action against a man who has been issuing death threats for ten years is if they know he's a fake and are in on it.

David Mabus (Dennis Markuze) I challenge you to do the right thing and confess your fraud. You are a fake, an act, a pretender. You are a liar defaming good Christian men and women with your routine. You are a sloppy, humorless, incompetent version of Borat. Stop libeling and slandering real Christians with your act.