Similar posts

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy science.slashdot.org

What you just communicated needs to be told and repeated to the masses until every person hears and understands this.

I believe that if the people on the street actually knew how and what we use (we..as in humankind)to collect the data that describes our physical universe and existence, they wouldn't believe a single thing the "scientific" community tells them. The modeling (practically all of it...pick your discipline) is flawed to the point that the data is literally unusable in an honest way. That doesn't mean that it isn't used by the "scientific community" (whatever that means). It is used...in a ridiculously dishonest way...to steal money from the US government in the form of grants. The most current harmful, and embarrassing misuse of this flawed data is the worlwide hysteria over Global Warming. Global Warming has become a religious arguement. It has no basis in reality, science, fact, or modern research. But people the world over (think Kyoto Protocol) believe that not only is the Earth getting warmer and that the phenomenon isn't cyclical, but that we (humans) not only caused it, but that we can somehow stop it and/or reverse it. Amazing arrogance...

Funnily, (but based on arrogance also) the same people (sheeple) who parrott the insanity that is Global Warming, also believe that it is stupid for other people to believe in a God. Objectively consider this for a few minutes....

Verdeschi #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Breaking: NASA will admit to causing global warming with its gravitational engine!

Wow, this is something big.

For years NASA has been banging the drum for global warming, blaming it on cars and trucks and planes and just about anything we do. One noticeable exception to the blame game is that they have never fingered themselves for any of the the harm they have done, until today.

Tucked away on a page about surface temperature [link to data.giss.nasa.gov] is this graph of ocean surface temperature. [link to data.giss.nasa.gov] So far so familiar but what happens when we overlay the graph with information about NASA spacecraft that use the gravitational assist engine.

[link to i.imgur.com]


Every single temperature peak coincides with NASA using a gravitational engine! sneaking this data out with no mention of their spacecraft is criminal behaviour.

So what is the gravitational engine? Back in the 1970s NASA was stuck with a headache, how to power themselves through the solar system. They came up with an innovative solution to the problem of rockets in outer space, steal gravity from the planets! The gravitational assist engine, codename SLINGSHOT, could push spacecraft to Saturn and beyond by stealing a little bit of gravity from every planet on the way and accelerating the probes to incredible speeds, here is how it worked for the Cassini spaceship.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

So what does it look like? I'm not a hundred percent on this, but this is Cassini ( or part of it ) under test [link to www.esa.int] It looks awfully familiar, where do you suppose they got the technology from?

What happened when it passed Earth? Every time one of the spacecraft passed Earth, gravity would be sucked off and used to power the engine, speeding up the probe on its way out but there is a problem, each of these temperature spikes [link to i.imgur.com] coincides with the use of the engine somewhere in space. So Cassini used it first in April 26, 1998, and June 24, 1999 causing two obvious spikes. By carefully selecting the data I have shown beyond doubt that NASA is culpable for at least some, if not all of global warming. That graph is as good as an admission from them.

So why is this happening? I think maybe its because the Earth's atmosphere is being held down by gravity, so if it's reduced, even by a tiny amount, the atmosphere has a chance to plump up, like a pillow, keeping more heat in [link to travellingacrosstime.files.wordpress.com (secure)] It wouldn't take much, maybe just a couple of hundred extra feet could cause these temperature spikes but then again, I may be wrong about that bit.

Anyway, that's what I have discovered, conclusive proof that NASA is behind global warming.

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

Can there still be any lingering doubt that Obongo, his Globalist handlers, and Sulzberger's glorified propaganda sheet are all "in cahoots" to grind down the American people into 3rd World dependency status? The deliberately fallacious classification of carbon dioxide as a "pollutant" was a trick designed to circumvent Congressional approval for killing the coal industry.

You see, the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) cannot make its own laws, but it can crack down on "pollution". Thus was carbon, the very breath we exhale and the "food" of all vegetation, magically transformed into a form of "pollution" that causes "Global Warming".

Obongo the Evil may have broken every campaign promise that his mendacious Marxist mouth ever muttered; but let's give him some credit for fulfilling one 2008 promise (spoken to a friendly Editorial Board) to wreck the coal industry and drive up electricity prices.

Obongo's statement in black; with your intrepid reporter's biting wise cracks in red [the statements in brackets]:

"The problem is, can you get the American people to say this is really important and force their representatives to do the right thing. (you just love using "force" don't you Obongo. Typical Communist)

That requires mobilizing a citizenry. That requires them understanding what is at stake. Climate change is a great example. (Ah yes, us dumb citizens need to be "required to understand" the junk science of non existent Global Warming / Climate Change)

When I was asked earlier about the issue of coal, under my plan of a cap and trade system electricity rates would sky rocket, even regardless of what I say about whether coal is good or bad. (That's just what a struggling American family needs, higher energy costs)

Because I’m capping greenhouse gasses, coal power plants, natural gas—whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was they’d have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money and they will pass that money on to consumers." (And then you'll piously blame the "greedy energy companies" for engaging in "Capitalist price-gauging")

"If we're going to get serious and cap the emission of green house gasses that are causing global warming (There is no Global warming and you damn well know it, you filthy degenerate Marxist LIAR!) then we are going to be having power plants have to figure out how to reduce carbon, because they’ll have to pay penalties (Penalties, penalties, penalties. Spoken like a true tyrant), if they exceed the cap—and that means they’re going to have to change how they operate.

And that means in turn that they’ll have to ("have to"; more control freak language) make investments (code word for throwing money away) that they’ll try to pass on to consumers and could result in higher electricity prices. (not "could result" monkey boy, WILL result)


In the short term, though, the government will help, (Great. Another welfare scheme. Let's call it ObongoElectric) we’re all going to have to be more energy efficient. (Does that mean that you and that nasty looking First Beast of yours will be curtailing your incessant Global joy riding on Air Force 1 & 2?)

We’re all going to have to (have to?) insulate our homes, change our light bulbs...(Yes Master. Your wish is this humble slave's command)"

This "man" is evil. Pure, unadulterated EVIL!

kirkz2006@yahoo.com #fundie groups.yahoo.com

It's so easy to refute the global warming freaks. For most of the past 70 years, the temperature has either been declining (from '40s to the late '70s) or staying the same (from 1996 to the present).

Never miss the opportunity to point out the same environmentalists touting man-made global warming today were claiming man-made global cooling in the 1970s.

KZ

J. Robert Smith #fundie americanthinker.com

Global warming adherents are simply replacing God -- Christian or otherwise -- with constructs of their own. It's quite remarkable that socialism or Marxism -- which are generally hostile to religion or faith, which lay claims to objectivity and reality, and which most global warming adherents are in sympathy with -- should fall into the hands of those who, despite their protestations, are decidedly antagonistic to the openness and dissent that in large part makes science science. Granted, socialism and Marxism are frauds (the latter especially), but they maintain some pretense of being reality-tested.

Global warming isn't a religion, not even figuratively. It more resembles a cult. In a couple of generations -- let's hope -- the global warming camp of our time will be seen clearly as having occupied the fringe of science; a heretical (in scientific terms) movement given to wild claims and inspired by a cultish fervency to convert fellow humans to their extreme beliefs -- findings and facts be damned.

Naturalized-Texan #fundie freeconservatives.com

AlGore got an Oscar for his Big Lie Propaganda film about global warming. If anyone was looking for proof that the claims of human-caused global warming are entirely political and have nothing to do with science, that Oscar certainly provides it.

If anyone would produce a documentary that told the truth about global warming - that it is the natural recovery from the 500-year Little Ice Age and is being caused by increased solar activity, i.e., a hotter sun - that documentary would never even be allowed to be shown in theaters, much less get an award.

Dani D #fundie rr-bb.com

[with regards to reducing the world population down to 500 million, as RR seemingly thinks environmentalists want to do]

While thinking about all this I had sort of a sudden thought about how in Revelation the Bible tells us that a third of the earth's population will be wiped out in one of the "Bowl" judgments.

Stay with me here... Here's what I'm thinking...

In Egypt the Egyptians were worshipping all sorts of weird things, like Frogs, etc... and when the Lord brought the plagues on the land it was just those things - a plague of frongs, etc...

What if "Global Warming" becomes basically the religion of the Beast and God finally says "Ok - you want Global Warming - I'll give it to you" and boom - the sun becomes hotter than ever (This is also mentioned in Revelation), then, as if to give them their "Population utopia of 500 million people, mentioned in my posted article above, God then wipes out a third of mankind.

I can't figure out the math, but if there are roughly 6 billion people on the earth now and the Church gets Raptured (Maybe 1 billion?) then you subtract 1 third, maybe you will end up with approx. 500 million people, which is the number that people who hold to this view think is the best for the earth.

I may be way off - but I think God often works this way and I don't see Global Warming going away any time soon.

Mike King #sexist tomatobubble.com

For the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class), the neo-con propaganda outlet FOX News has, for the past 20 years or so, served the important purpose of keeping conservatives on a leash long enough to allow to them vent off their frustration, yet just short enough to keep them from wandering off into the land of total truth. The sole saving grace of the network was that, in allowing just enough cosmetic "conservatism" to air before millions of viewers, a percentage of the more astute elements of the massive audience would eventually wander off the plantation completely and join the ranks of the full truth "conspiracy theorists" TM. Indeed, during the late 1990's, your now fully enlightened Editor here passed through the FAUX News / Rush Limbaugh halfway-house before growing out of the "Left-Right" control cage altogether.

For that reason, in spite of our disdain for Rupert Murdoch's FAUX, we are nonetheless troubled by the recent and much-publicized rise of his de-balled sons (Lachlin & James) and their stupid and controlling communist wives (Sarah & Kathyrn). The scuttlebutt is that the contemptible, yet immensely popular, Bill O'Reilly was forced out by these beautiful women. O'Reilly's coveted 8 PM slot will be filled by Tucker Carlson, whose first guest as the new 8-PMer under the reign of the Bolshevik Bitches will be a man that O'Reilly once mocked -- the freakish trannie, Bruce Jenner (now referred to as "Caitlyn").

1. Kathryn made no effort to hide her love for Hillary and red-hot hatred for Trump & Bannon (She likes Ivanka though!)

2. Kathryn's "kinder, gentler" FOX will feature the degenerate freak Bruce Jenner.

Expect some of O'Reilly's elderly following to have heart attacks when Jenner appears with Carlson this coming Monday (April 24th)! But don't blame Carlson (who is actually not that bad) for having such a vile Satanic creature on his program. You can be sure that the Murdoch women, Kathryn in particular, are behind this obscenity. The Sisters-in-Law Murdoch had already previously amended the company's benefits package to include "expanded coverage for our transgender colleagues.”

Both Kathryn and Sarah are known to be "progressives." Of the two, Katryn (much like another silly little rich girl, Ivanka Trump) wields more power in her own right. She is a real fanatic when it comes to Trump-bashing, homosexuality, trannies and the Global Warming TM / Climate Change TM hoax. Since the Murdochs swallowed up National Geographic in 2015, that psuedo-scientific rag has continued to aggressively push the hoax while not allowing any real scientists to rebut the "settled science." The "philanthropist" Kathryn also worked for both the Clinton Climate Initiative and the Environmental Defense Fund. (here)

Old man Rupert once dismissed the Global Warming TM / Climate Change TM hoax as "alarmist nonsense." We expect this attitude at FOX News to "evolve" and eventually align with the views of the young Murdochs' National Geographic and Kathryn's beloved Environmental Defense Fund.

Now if you thought those National Geographic covers were bad, get a load of the EVIL boy-trannie child-abuse abomination that the next generation of the House of Murdoch recently put out. It's enough to almost make us want to plead with wretched old man Rupert Murdoch and that arrogant ass-clown Bill O'Reilly -- "Please, stay!"

Childhood psycho-sexual abuse --- coming soon to FOX's conservative audience.

The modern trend of men allowing their deranged women to rule over them is yet another symptom of the decay and decline of Western Civilization. Another high profile example of this alarming phenomenon is baby girl's Ivanka Trump-Kushner's uncontrolled White House antics -- such as her uninformed public support for the Global Warming TM / Climate Change TM hoax, "women's workplace issues," and her meeting with the baby butchers and baby body-part dealers of Planned Parenthood. Neither "The Donald" nor Ivanka's typically P-whipped Jewish husband, Jared Kushner, could reign in this spoiled little brat even if they wanted to.

And speaking of P-whipped, does it get any more pathetic than Pro Football Super Star and Trumpstein supporter, Tom Brady, failing to show up at the White House ceremony to honor the New England Patriots Super Bowl victory? You see, boys and girls, Brady's super-model wife, Giselle Bundchen, is an outspoken pro-abortionist, an anti-Trump tweeter, and a "Climate Change" TM libtard who is evidently embarrassed and fed-up with her husband's support for Trumpstein. We'll bet you dimes to doughnuts that the lovely Giselle put her high-heeled foot down and threatened to close down the candy store until pretty Tommy put an end to his public support for Trumpstein.

Your old-school Editor here at The Anti-New York Times has the utmost gentlemanly respect for the ladies. That respect does not extend to any "man" who allows a woman, no matter how blonde and beautiful, to de-ball and dictate to him. Unless and until men rediscover their balls and tell the Ivanka Trumps, the Giselle Bundchens, the Kathryn Murdochs and the Sarah Murdochs of our diseased and decaying society: "Shut up and sit down, you silly woman!" -- there will be no hope for the recovery of our collective sanity. Then again, in fairness to such men and in consideration of what our Marxist courts allow these wayward women to inflict upon husbands and fathers, many bullied men have no choice but to meekly accept the mischief of their wives -- or face alienation from their children.

Sick upside-down world!

Proverbs 21:19: Better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and angry woman.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times that the Murdoch sons and their wives are much more liberal than the old man.

Boobus Americanus 2: It would be nice if they overhaul FOX News and make it more objective. As it stands now, I can't stomach it.

Sugar: Hey Boobusss! Ya think your panssie-ass could stomach a ssubscription to the Anti-New York Times?

Editor: If Boobus can't even handle the watered-down half-truths of FAUX News, then he'd surely puke his guts up over the true stuff we put out.

Terry Michael #conspiracy terrymichael.net

Losing a debate about one of your most cherished beliefs? There’s a handy way to shut down such discourse, to discredit intellectual enemies employing pesky reading-and-fact-based arguments. Just call them out as deniers or denialists, as in the epitome of earthly evil, Holocaust Denialism.

Demonize your critics, to stop them from criticizing your demons. It works really well for talking heads, like New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, observed in December on Cable Noise Network putting down the global warming “deniers,” as he called them (while hawking the tree-killing paperback version of his latest opus magnum, “Hot, Flat, and Crowded 2.0: Why We Need a Green Revolution.”)

Not convinced? Then consult preachers at The Al Gore Church of Greenhouse Gas Bags, or medical science experts in The HIV-AIDS Industrial Complex. Listen to them shout about the apocalyptic meltdown being wrought by global warming denialists. Hear them exhort against the killer AIDS denialists.

The “tricking” of tree ring “data” revealed in the Climategate emails should be instructive to all free minds. Many scientists are just politicians with advanced degrees. They play their expertise card to propagandize for less-than-fully-baked theories--just like the best and the brightest domino theory’d us into Vietnam, those brilliant neo-con-artists WMD’d us into Iraq, and our super smart president fooled himself (and us) into the Afghan abyss.

As I tell my political journalism students, accept no received wisdom, especially when it comes from figure-ers who lie, and liars who figure.

For the past quarter century, the “denialist” epithet has been hurled at credible, well-motivated biologists, bio-chemists, physicians, epidemiologists, investigative science-and-health journalists, and other intelligent outliers with the temerity to question the scientific consensus behind the single pathogen theory of what caused AIDS.

Acquired immune deficiency syndrome, as it was labeled after first being called Gay Related Immunodeficiency Syndrome or GRID, really was--no denying it--killing thousands of gay men for about a decade, from the early 1980's to the beginning of the 1990's, when its incidence started to decline. But most of the interpreters of our reality, the science-and-math-challenged Main Stream Media, who wouldn’t know a biology lab from a Labrador Retriever, believe the drop in what has become known as “HIV disease” was a function of miracle drugs peddled by the pharmaceutical industry, the Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapies--that benign-sounding but highly toxic “side”-affecting HAART, introduced in 1996, three or four years after AIDS began to subside.

AIDS “denialists,” the first of whom was biologist Dr. Peter Duesberg of the Univ. of California at Berkeley, have been shunned from the free market of ideas. They have been denied entry to scientific and medical peer review journals. They are much like the “deniers” who dare question the received wisdom of The Gore-acle of Global Warming.

Having spent the past three years studying mysteries of the HIV=AIDS paradigm, I am ready to admit I am a full-fledged, out-of-the-closet, HIV-AIDS denialist. After some pretty intense book reading, almost daily internet-assisted document research, and considerable old-fashioned journalistic interviewing of knowledgeable sources, I have concluded there is not now, there never was, a “human immunodeficiency virus.” The single pathogen theory was wrong. A controversial view, to be sure, but one for which I can cite facts and fact-based arguments.

AIDS among gay men was of multi-factorial causation, from an unusually intense exchange of old pathogens in the aftermath of the mid-20th Century sexual revolution; an unprecedented ingestion of toxins, in the form of recreational drugs; and the psychogenically health damaging effects of being a hated minority group--all of which were immuno-suppressive in a subset of gay men who ghetto-ized themselves in urban America after the late 1960's.

And heterosexual AIDS in Africa? It’s just the name given by western medicine men to health harm from old immuno-suppressive malnutrition and unclean drinking water, and a high incidence of old diseases like tuberculosis and malaria--not the result of a wily retrovirus that never caused a heterosexual epidemic of AIDS in the white West.

I published the results of my study in an 8,000-word piece at my web site on the internet, about the only place we denialists can give voice to our dissent, and even there it’s difficult. I learned that December 7, when a guest commentary I wrote on AIDS and Big Pharma was erased Soviet-style from the popular Wall Street web site founded by CNBC’s Jim Cramer, TheStreet.com, after being up only four hours. I made the mistake of mentioning one of the powerful purveyors of anti-retrovirals, Gilead Sciences, Inc.

You can read my thoughts on the mysteries of HIV-AIDS here: End to AIDS Nearer Than We Think? Re-appraising HIV in its 25th Anniversary Year. And you can see the trailer for a new documentary film here: "House of Numbers," which raises questions about the single pathogen theory of AIDS.

"Give the people a new word and they think they have a new fact," Willa Cather wrote. The acronym HIV-AIDS is not even a word, let alone a fact.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesus-is-savior.com

As bizarre as it may seem to the uneducated person in the area of elite occultism and pedophilia, child-sex is epidemic amongst the globalist elite and always has been. It is common knowledge that the Afghanistan government are rogue drug-lords kept in power by the globalist elite. Following the 911 attacks, in 2002 a U.S. led United Nations coalition invaded Afghanistan and appointed their own new government. Then and now, Afghanistan produces 90% of the world's opium (having a heroine street value of $500,000,000 in sales). U.S. troops are being exploited as paid poppy farmers. NATO oversees all this evil. Where does all that opium go? Who profits from it? The truth is obvious.

The Russian government pleaded with NATO to destroy the opium fields, because millions of Russians are hopelessly addicted to heroine and dying each year. NATO refused! The same is happening in America and around the world. Who profits from all the opium being grown in Afghanistan (a nation that the U.S. co-called "liberated" in 2002)? Who's kidding who? The criminal global elite are behind all this. And they're the one's raping the little girls of Afghanistan...

Opium Brides (heroine & 7-year old girls taken in Afghanistan for pedophile global elite)

Who are the global elite? They operate through The Council On Foreign Relations. Child sexual abuse is prevalent amongst the global elite. Here's a bunch more information.

Please understand that I'm NOT saying that the Mormon church has anything to do with Afghanistan, Bush or Reagan, the global pedophile elite, illegal sex trafficking, et cetera. What I am trying to establish is that pedophilia is a common denominator amongst the global elite (the powerful and wealthy who control the nations). Remember, nations don't rule the world, corporations do! The U.S. Pentagon renews contracts with DynCorp, a known sex-trafficking company.

The Sicko Mormon Religion

Mormons masquerade as true Christians, but they are of the Devil. Few people ever come to recognize the true occult nature and satanic depth of the Mormon cult. If you do some research, you will learn quickly that the common denominator between all false so-called Christian religions in America is Freemasonry. These demonic fake religions include: Jehovah's Witnesses, Charismatics (Oral Roberts), Mormonism, Seventh Day Adventism, Judaism, Kaballah, Christian Science, Churches of Christ, Scientology and Wicca). Mormonism is steeped in Jewish Kabbala. Freemasonry, Judaism, Kaballa and Mormonism are ALL SEX-BASED CULTS!!! The very emblem of Freemasonry—the compass and the carpenter's square—symbolizes sexual intercourse.

Why is it that Americans are being policed with trained guard dogs, bag searches, strip searches, naked body scans, TSA pat downs and groping, Darth Vader looking thug cops, and an increasingly intolerant attitude toward innocent citizens? Yet, meanwhile, families in Afghanistan are totally helpless against the thug drug lords that are stealing their 7-year old daughters to be raped by the global elite. NATO actually protects the criminals. Afghan farmers are forced to grow opium because other forms of honest living are not allowed nor practical in a corrupt system.

Through cleverly designed newsmedia propaganda, white-washing and deliberate disinformation (lying and deceiving), the globalist owned and controlled newsmedia has been able to suppress the blatant horrendous crimes of the global elite themselves [which includes the 911 attacks, the Iraqi war, and the ongoing farming of opium (heroine) crops in Afghanistan and thug stealing of Afghan's little girls to supply the insatiable pedophile appetite of the globalists.]

Goldman Sachs Caught Investing In Sex-Trafficking Ring (Mitt Romney's wife invested too)

Homosexual Prostitution, Child Molesting, the CIA and Washington D.C. Officials

Why is Goldman Sachs running a sex-slave fund? Oh, did I mention the List Of 37 Names of GOLDMAN SACHS People in the Obama Government?

The White (Goldman Sachs) House (Goldman Sachs in the White House)

It's such a con job. It's all a big scam, intended to harvest the daughters of the Afghani people. Where are the authorities? Where is the government? Where are the U.S. troops that are supposed to be liberating their country? Our troops are being exploited as paid mercenaries and opium farmers! The popular excuse is that it's “THE CULTURE.” Watch the preceding video all the way through. A culture of child rape by drug lords? Who's kidding who?

Gandhi's Fist #conspiracy breitbart.tv

Wow--where to start, where to start...?

First, the arguement. Climate change is inherent on this planet. Proof? 10,000 years ago, the entire planet was in the throws of a global ice age. Without the assistance of man, that ice--which was over 1 mile in depth over NYC--melted. All this without the assistance of man or observations by Al Gore. As it turns out, both the planets Mars and Saturn have experienced global warming at exactly the same time we did. How do we know this? NASA was good enough to provide global orbiters which amongst many beautiful photos, provided extraordinarily accurate temperature readings. Now, I'm no Bill Nye, but what could be the cause of global warming/cooling on a solar system wide scale. Hummm? Could it be...the sun? Add to this that Global warming/climate change "scientists" have been manipulating numbers to inflict odious taxes on the population (by the way--there is your motive) and there you have it; the world's greatest fraud.

No one, not a single person I know of either political stripe likes pollution and waste, but this eco-con artistry is more than that. It is not based on science, but statist political ambition, funded by carbon tax. Tax just for breathing.

Bill Nye is the second aguement that could be made here. Nye gets some funding by--wait for it--the public trough. That's right, he gets money from the government. The government wants money from us. Does anyone see--at the very least--a conflict of interest. Further, while Bill Nye is has training--primarily as an engineer, he is no atmospheric scientist. So basically, this interview would be like getting a botanist to discuss open heart surgery in humans. He isn't qualified. Just like Al Gore isn't qualified. A polical science major does not an atmospheric scientist make.

The facts of our climate are quite the opposite of the picture painted by the global warm--no, wait--climate change con artists. The earth has been cooling, globally since 1998. While there are pockets of hot weather, the trend is definitely towards colder temps. It does not take a savant like Gore, to figure out that something has to cool the atmosphere in order for it to snow at all. You folks have any idea what that "something" might be? My money is on the sun. Which brings us to the study of that blazing hot orb. The study of the sun (also compliments of NASA), have revealed a marked reduction in sunspots, a year's absence in fact. To those not knowledgeable about the study of the Heliosphere, this roughly translated means the sun is cooling a little. This year we've also posted record low temperatures, planet wide.

Al may have made a nice fictional movie, publicly funded scientists want to see us taxed and the left wing media like Madow might want us to support this agenda using pseudo scientific arguments, but now that we see what they're up to we're saying, "NO!". On a personal level, I'm also saying, "Al--eat my shorts."

Invictus & snake321 #conspiracy wrongplanet.net

(just part of a ridiculously long conspiracy rant. Remainder of the thread is equally deranged.)

You can't swallow this so just go back to believing the predigested propaganda they feed you everyday. And if you do know what's up, everybody around you will disown you, fight you and incarcerate you for speaking the truth. I just did time for thought crime. My family snitched me out to the government for what I'm about to tell you now. This is no joke. George Orwell's 1984 is now. But everyone is walking around like zombies stuck in a TV daze. If you truly desire to open Pandora's box- you have to be willing to jump out of a plane with no chute. To sacrifice comfort for truth. Because in these times ahead it will be crucial weather you are asleep or awake.
To summarize: Everything you believe in very passionately is a LIE. Religion, politics- every popularized group thought. If you didn't invent it, it's been created to control you. To divide you. The masonic motto is "divide and conquer." The word "illuminati" means illumined: bright. Smart. One that can see in the dark, like an owl; one that has knowledge that the profane (you) don't have. (See the back of the dollar bill.) The people in charge of the world are evil, inbred, psychopathic, control freaks that instigate fake wars throughout centuries to profit, exterminate and keep the masses in a dumbed-down, confused state. In virtually every major "news" event, there exists a completely hidden agenda behind what was told to you. From JFK to the moon landings to 9/11 to Charles Manson to the Virginia Tech shootings to the Columbine massacre to the "education system" to the air you breathe to the food you eat, to the vaccinations you receive to the "founding fathers" to the "constitution" to global warming. That's the big one. The government is using "global warming" to gradually remove your freedoms and eventually form a one world government. Originally they were going to use a fake alien threat which Reagan talked about and that the C.I.A. promotes through science fiction, military manufactured flying saucers and government conducted "alien" abductions. That's what "The War of the Worlds" was about. To test the publics reaction. They've opted instead for environmental guilt and worship of "mother earth." And it's working.

Michael Klein #conspiracy #sexist sciencefiles.org

Climate Hysteria is female
The Genderista (Translator's note: appears to be a personal snarlword of his for the Feminazi establishment or something) already proclaimed long ago that "climate change is male" - a claim that led us to the question whether there is an equivalency between "female professor" and "mental deficiency", if only because only fantastically-inclined Genderista manage to produce a correlation between men, which they naturally and as paragons of group-based misanthropy declare a homogenous group and a natural phenomenon which already existed before there were men on Earth.

But as many a wise (white) person from the Palentinate has said:
Thinking is a matter of luck - for some.

Our assessment that climate hysteria is female, on the other hand, is an empirically supported assessment for which there is evidence:

For one, there is no certain evidence at all that anthropogenic climate change is in the process. As long as Earth has existed, the planet's climate has been changing. Whether humans have recently contributed to climate change to a noteworthy degree is an open question which is open because the existant climate models are junk, the claim that CO2 is a climate killer is a hoax, because it is known that the IPCC (the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change) likes to manipulate their own data and, on top of it, the bilance of climate change as of now, calculated on the basis of a general increase of Earth's temperature by 1 degree Celsius, is a POSITIVE one. Yes: Climate change does not only have negative effects, it also has benefits:

“In my Climate Change Misconceived earlier essay, that explored the dissonance in public understanding of the climate change issue, I contended that based on the best available science and empirical evidence post-industrial climate change (whether it be man-made or natural) apparently has not caused exceptional or accelerating rises in sea levels, has not caused an increase in the frequency or intensity of extreme weather events and has not caused accelerating global species extinctions. Similarly, whilst heat-related deaths have increased with the warming, cold-related deaths have fallen even more – so net-mortality has improved. Furthermore according to Dr. Indur Goklanky, science analyst for the US Department of the Interior, ‘Carbon dioxide fertilises plants, and emissions from fossil fuels have already had a hugely beneficial effect on crops, increasing yields by at least 10-15%.’ So it has apparently been net-beneficial for agriculture. Professor Richard Tol of Sussex University (after reviewing 14 different studies of the effects of future climate trends) concluded that global warming would likely be economically net-beneficial for the world up to 30C. So with only 10C of warming it certainly appears to have been economically net-beneficial to date. Against all this we have to set the effects of ocean warming and reduced alkalinity that have probably been net-harmful for marine life. Taken as a whole, the positive changes from post-industrial climate change appear to have outweighed the negative changes – and the negative changes (in particular rising sea levels) are apparently currently happening sufficiently slowly for us to adapt to them.”
That there are two sides to everything, not just good and not just bad, that is, of course, an insight which - if it is said in the wrong context - leads to being labeled a right-wing populist or a right-winger or a climate denialist. Regardless of this, common sense and Aristotle already tell us that the truth often lies in the middle, that is, in between good and evil. One exception: The Greens.

But joke aside.

He who, in the face of lacking evidence for anthropogenic climate change, in the face of up-to-now positive benefit of climate change and in the face of manipulations in the records of the IPCC, believes anthropogenic climate change to be proven, not only demonstrates himself a fundamental believer who feels beholden to the new climate-religion (because he prefers to keep distance to rationality), he also demonstrates that he wants to believe in something.

People who want to believe unconditionally and against any empirical evidence have left the ground of normal existence, so they must be classified as either dangerous or as hysterical, the latter especially if they begin to submit their everyday lives to the premise that there is anthropogenic climate change that affects their lives negatively and which, in the worst case, lets their miserable lives end prematurely.

The WHO draws the line with most diagnosis of psychological disorders where "normal everyday funvction" is no longer possible. All the fashionable addictions, from internet addiction to smartphone to gaming addiction, require for their diagnosis a negative effect on the normal proceedings of daily life, e.g. avoidance of the work place or truancy.

And now we have arrived at the FridayForFuture demonstrations, whose participants are making it explicit that they're truants. In the diction of the WHO, this means: They do no longer function normally. The normal proceedings of their lives are impaired by the delusions under which they operate or by a psychological disorder that has taken ahold of them.

In this case, by hysteria.

In the beginning of the 19th Century, hysterically was exclusively registered and diagnosed as "female hysteria". The explanations for why hysteria mostly affects women were diverse and we do not need to take interest in them as research in the beginning of the 20th Century lead to the diagnosis of "female hysteria" mostly disappearing, The "Studies on Hysteria" conducted by Siegmund Freud together with Josef Breuer in 1895 lead to hysteria being viewed as a syndrome that mostly, but not exclusively, affects women, and even to no longer speaking of "female hysteria", but of hysteria as an anxiety disorder. But this classification fell temporarilly and for various reasons out of favour. The main reason lies in the variable use that the concept of hysteria has experienced over the course of the 20th Century, a use behind which lie neurological, psychophysiological conditions and mass panic in equal measure. In short: The term had become arbitrary and had been dropped for this reason. Accordingly, R. E. Kendall wrote in an essay from the year 2001:

“Contemporary understanding of hysterical behavior has been influenced strongly by the sociological concepts of the ‘sick role’ and ‘illness behavior’ and by learning theory, and attempts to reduce both the attractions of the sick role and influences discouraging healthy behavior now have a central role in management. This conceptual model explains the distribution of hysterical behaviors in populations, including the predominance in young women, and many other clinical observations, but it fails to account either for neurological conversion symptoms or for fugues and other dissociative phenomena.”
Hysterical behaviour, that is, behaviour not appropriate for the situation, is now viewed as learned behaviour that is mostly to be found in girls and young women who try to win attention through a role as a victim they write for themselves.

On this basis, we can explain our headline:

A survey among the participants of FridaysForFuture demonstrations revealed that up to 70% of participants are female. The results is based on about 2000 interviews with participants in nine states and 13 cities. This meager result that was nonetheless financed by the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (and which could also have been reached by counting) is the subject of a press release by the Technic University of Chemnitz. The press release not only demonstrates that our headline: "Climate hysteria is female" is empirically supportedk it also shows the mental confusion to which attempting to make oneself servile to the Genderista leads, for as it says in the press release:

"... reports project leader Dr. Piotz Kocyba. More surprising than the age of the domestrators is, for example, the predominance of female she-participants (Translator's note: feminine form) ..."

This can only surprise those who are not familiar with the research on hysterical behaviour, but with people who write about "female participants (Translator's note: see above), one would not really expect that anyways.

Original GermanDie Klimahysterie ist weiblich

Die Genderista hat schon vor Jahren verkündet, dass der „Klimawandel männlich“ sei – eine Behauptung, die uns veranlasst hat, die Frage zu stellen, ob es eine Äquivalenz zwischen „weiblicher Professor“ und „mentaler Beschränkung“ gibt, schon weil nur phantastisch veranlagte Genderista es schaffen, einen Zusammenhang zwischen Männern, die sie natürlich und in bester Manier der gruppenbezogenen Menschenfeindlichkeit zu einer homogenen Gruppe erklären und einem Naturphänomen, das es schon gab, als es auf der Erde noch keine Männer gab, herzustellen.

Aber, wie hat ein weis(ß)er Pfälzer gesagt: Denke iss Gliggsach – bei manchen.

Dagegen ist unsere Feststellung, dass die Klimahysterie weiblich ist, eine empirisch fundierte Feststellung, die sich belegen lässt:

So gibt es keinerlei gesicherte Befunde, die zeigen, dass sich derzeit ein von Menschen gemachter Klimawandel vollzieht. Seit es die Erde gibt, wandelt sich das Klima des Planeten. Ob Menschen seit kurzem den Klimawandel in nennenswertem Ausmaß mitbefördern, ist eine offene Frage, die deshalb offen ist, weil die vorhandenen Klimamodelle Junk sind, die Behauptung, dass CO2 ein Klimakiller-Molekül sei, ein Hoax ist, weil bekannt ist, dass das IPCC (das Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) gerne die eigenen Daten manipuliert und darüber hinaus die bisherige Bilanz des Klimawandels, berechnet auf der Grundlage von einer generellen Erhöhung der Erdtemperatur um 1 Grad Celsius eine POSITIVE ist. Ja: Klimawandel hat nicht nur Nachteile, er hat auch Vorteile:

“In my Climate Change Misconceived earlier essay, that explored the dissonance in public understanding of the climate change issue, I contended that based on the best available science and empirical evidence post-industrial climate change (whether it be man-made or natural) apparently has not caused exceptional or accelerating rises in sea levels, has not caused an increase in the frequency or intensity of extreme weather events and has not caused accelerating global species extinctions. Similarly, whilst heat-related deaths have increased with the warming, cold-related deaths have fallen even more – so net-mortality has improved. Furthermore according to Dr. Indur Goklanky, science analyst for the US Department of the Interior, ‘Carbon dioxide fertilises plants, and emissions from fossil fuels have already had a hugely beneficial effect on crops, increasing yields by at least 10-15%.’ So it has apparently been net-beneficial for agriculture. Professor Richard Tol of Sussex University (after reviewing 14 different studies of the effects of future climate trends) concluded that global warming would likely be economically net-beneficial for the world up to 30C. So with only 10C of warming it certainly appears to have been economically net-beneficial to date. Against all this we have to set the effects of ocean warming and reduced alkalinity that have probably been net-harmful for marine life. Taken as a whole, the positive changes from post-industrial climate change appear to have outweighed the negative changes – and the negative changes (in particular rising sea levels) are apparently currently happening sufficiently slowly for us to adapt to them.”

Dass jedes Ding zwei Seiten hat, nicht nur gut und nicht nur schlecht ist, das ist natürlich eine Erkenntnis, die – wenn man sie im falschen Kontext äußert – dazu führt, dass man sich als Rechtspopulist oder Rechter oder Klimaleugner bezeichnet findet. Dessen ungeachtet sagen bereits der gesunde Menschenverstand und Aristoteles, dass die Wahrheit oft in der Mitte liegt, also zwischen gut und böse. Eine Ausnahme: Die Grünen.

Aber Spaß beiseite.

Wer angesichts nicht vorhandener Belege für einen menschengemachten Klimawandel, angesichts bislang positiver Nutzen durch den Klimawandel und angesichts von Manipulationen in den Berichten des IPCC den menschengemachten Klimawandel für bewiesen hält, der zeigt damit nicht nur, dass er ein fundamental Gläubiger ist, der sich der neuen Klima-Religion verbunden fühlt (während er von Rationalität eher Abstand nimmt), er zeigt damit auch, dass er etwas glauben will.

Menschen, die unbedingt und gegen jeden empirischen Beleg glauben wollen, haben den Boden einer normalen Existenz verlassen, so dass man sie entweder als gefährlich oder als hysterisch einordnen muss, Letzteres vor allem dann, wenn sie anfangen, ihr tägliches Leben unter die Prämisse zu stellen, dass es einen menschengemachten Klimawandel gibt, der ihr Leben negativ beeinträchtigen und sie, im schlimmsten Fall, ihr miserables Leben vorzeitig beenden lässt.

Die WHO zieht die Grenze bei den meisten Diagnosen von psychischen Störungen da, wo ein „normales Funktionieren im Alltag“ nicht mehr möglich ist. Die ganzen Mode-Süchte, von der Internet-, über die Smartphone bis zur Spielsucht, erfordern in ihrer Diagnose einen negativen Effekt auf die normalen Verrichtungen des täglichen Lebens, z.B. das Fernbleiben vom Arbeitsplatz oder das Schulschwänzen.

Damit sind wir bei den FridaysForFuture Demonstrationen, deren Teilnehmer explizit machen, dass sie die Schule schwänzen. In der Diktion der WHO bedeutet dies: Sie funktionieren nicht mehr normal. Die normalen Verrichtungen ihres Lebens werden durch eine Wahnvorstellung, unter der sie handeln oder durch eine psychische Störung, die sie im Griff hat, beeinträchtigt.

Im vorliegenden Fall durch Hysterie.

Hysterie wurde bis zum Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts ausschliesslich als „weibliche Hysterie“ erfasst und diagnostiziert. Die Erklärungen dafür, dass Hysterie in erster Linie Frauen ereilt, waren vielfältig und müssen uns hier nicht interessieren, denn die Forschung zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts hat dazu geführt, dass die Diagnose „weibliche Hysterie“ weitgehend verschwunden ist. Die 1895 von Sigmund Freud gemeinsam mit Josef Breuer veröffentlichten „Studien über Hysterie“ haben dazu geführt, Hysterie als Krankheitsbild zu betrachten, das zwar mehrheitlich, aber nicht nur Frauen befällt und darüber hinaus nicht mehr von weiblicher Hysterie, sondern von Hysterie als einer Angst-Störung zu sprechen. Auch diese Klassifikation ist zwischenzeitlich und aus vielen Gründen in Ungnade gefallen. Der Hauptgrund findet sich in der variablen Verwendung, die das Konzept „Hysterie“ im Verlauf des 20. Jahrhunderts gefunden hat, eine Verwendung, hinter der sich neurologische, psychophysiologische Bedingungen und Massenpaniken in gleicher Weise finden. Kurz: Der Begriff war beliebig geworden und wurde deshalb fallen gelassen wurde. Entsprechend schreibt R. E. Kendall in einem Beitrag aus dem Jahre 2001:

“Contemporary understanding of hysterical behavior has been influenced strongly by the sociological concepts of the ‘sick role’ and ‘illness behavior’ and by learning theory, and attempts to reduce both the attractions of the sick role and influences discouraging healthy behavior now have a central role in management. This conceptual model explains the distribution of hysterical behaviors in populations, including the predominance in young women, and many other clinical observations, but it fails to account either for neurological conversion symptoms or for fugues and other dissociative phenomena.”

Hysterisches, also den Umständen nicht angemessenes Verhalten wird nunmehr als erlerntes Verhalten betrachtet, das sich vornehmlich bei Mädchen und jungen Frauen findet, die versuchen, über eine Opferrolle, die sie sich zuschreiben, Aufmerksamkeit zu gewinnen.

Auf dieser Grundlage können wir nun unsere Überschrift erklären:

Eine Befragung unter Teilnehmern der FridaysForFuture-Demonstrationen, hat ergeben, dass bis zu 70% der Teilnehmer weiblich sind. Das Ergebnis basiert auf rund 2000 Interviews mit Teilnehmern in neun Ländern und 13 Städten. Dieses magere Ergebnis, das nichtsdestotrotz vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung finanziert wurde (und das man über Zählen ebenso hätte erhalten können), ist Gegenstand einer Pressemeldung der TU-Chemnitz. Die Pressemeldung zeigt nicht nur, warum unsere Überschrift: „Klimahysterie ist weiblich“ empirisch fundiert ist, sie zeigt auch, zu welcher geistigen Verwirrung der Versuch, sich bei der Genderista anzudienen führt, heißt es doch in der Pressemeldung:

„… berichtet Projektleiter Dr. Piotr Kocyba. Überraschender als das junge Alter der Demonstrantinnen und Demonstranten beispielsweise sei die Dominanz weiblicher Teilnehmerinnen …“.

Überraschen kann das nur, wer nicht mit der Forschung zu hysterischem Verhalten vertraut ist, aber bei Leuten, die von „weiblichen Teilnehmerinnen“ schreiben, ist das auch eher nicht zu erwarten.

Snoopynstorm #fundie rr-bb.com

There's so much stuff to do with going green and the enviornment. Who knows it may be a way for the AntiChrist to push his agenda on Christians in the tribulation period. You can't have a Bible unless it's a green Bible! All others are banned! s shoulders: Who knows though I'm just speculating.

Honestly, with the green propaganda. I remember in 7th grade, I think we watched that Al Gore movie. I think she even mentioned how running bath water takes up alot or something. I thought global warming was absoute fact. Just recently, maybe a year ago or a little bit longer I found out there's people who don't believe in global warming. Talk about propaganda in the school system and society! That is just perfect for the AntiChrist and his green agenda. Get young people who don't know there's another side to the argument.

Remember I was in 7th grade 2005-2006 so I thought it was fact for a long time. And, the reason I found out was by a Christian show. Now it'll be even harder to know the truth when such stuff will be out lawed. Wow, when you're taught we evolved from monkies and taught to pretty much worship the earth...the AntiChrist has a great headstart especially with the youth.

Let me give you an example. I remember when I was in high school one day. I was in the bathroom. I overheard someone talking. I remember hearing a girl state about her disbelief in God and belief in evolution.

Brussell Sprout #conspiracy brussellsprout.blogspot.co.uk

A rogue planet known in ancient times as Nibiru, The Destroyer, Wormwood, The Frightener, The Terrible Comet, Hercolubus and various other names, is headed toward Planet Earth once again, and has already begun to spawn a series of global catastrophes. In modern times, this dangerous celestial body has been known by the name of Planet X.

It's difficult to discern the exact truth about this subject because it's been deliberately obscured by disinformation. We're dealing with one of the biggest cover-ups in the history of mankind, and that's saying a lot, because the competition is so fierce.

But after 10 years of research, one school of thought that makes a lot of sense to me is that like most of the stars in the universe, our sun is part of a binary system. A smaller star -- possibly a brown dwarf star -- orbits the sun, and at least seven planets orbit the second sun, also known as Nemesis and the Dark Star. Planet X is the outermost planet in the Nemesis system, which invades our inner solar system every 3,600 years or so -- possibly even more often than that. Some evidence suggests this happens every 300 to 500 years.

One thing is clear -- Earth has repeatedly been devastated by cosmic catastrophes. It's well-documented in the historical and geological record.

* I had to stop updating my blog for my own personal safety. The death threats and harassment I experience have dramatically increased lately, which makes me think we're getting close to the main event.

Fortunately, the following youtube channels provide updates on a regular basis, and some of the videos they've uploaded are excellent: Prep Aussie, Separated Society, sasa lucic, smiff da mista, Expitaly. There are many others as well.

Facebook has a number of Nibiru forums where you can discuss this topic , including Nibiru Ascending, Nibiru-It's Real-It's Here, Nibiru Countdown and more. Also try the Pole Shift Ning.

Most of these groups are heavily infiltrated by trolls, but you can still find some useful information there if you wade through all the junk.

* There are lots of photographs (click on them to see an enlarged version) and videos on this blog that show various celestial objects in the sky right now. That leads me to believe Planet X might arrive sooner than some people have been speculating -- possibly as soon as June or July 2016.


The Jade Helm military exercises started on July 15, 2015, and supposedly concluded on Sept. 15. But even that could be a smokescreen. The military is already in place now, so a catastrophic event such as an asteroid strike, meteor storm, volcano eruption or earthquake could happen at any time.

Obviously I can't guarantee Planet X will arrive in June or July. If I had access to the information NASA is covering up, I could make a more definite prediction. I don't know exactly when Planet X will get here, but I think we should all be prepared for the possibility that it will arrive sooner than the dates often predicted on the Internet -- August 2016 or even sometime in 2017.

I think those dates might be disinformation.

The point is, it's going to happen soon -- possibly in June or July, and if not, almost certainly before the end of this year.

[...]

The movie "2012" was deliberately released with the wrong year in the title in order to discredit the Planet X cover-up as a wild "conspiracy theory." The idea was, when 2012 passed and nothing happened, clueless people would say, "See, it was all a paranoid conspiracy theory. There's no such thing as Planet X."

All along, the movie producers knew the major catastrophes weren't going to happen until years later. The psychological effect produced by the movie bought the elite some more time to make their preparations without society completely falling apart into panic mode.

[...]

Another film that depicted the impending cataclysms was "Deep Impact," which was released in 1998. Morgan Freeman played the black president (think Obama) who announced to the world that a comet was headed for Earth. It also depicted the elite seeking shelter in underground bunkers. Here's the trailer on youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLgSKv2P-ow

Lots of other films in recent years have depicted Earth getting hit by meteors, including "Meteor Storm," released in 2009. This is because film producers often have inside information about events that are expected to happen in the future, and they release the films as a way of indirectly warning the public. It's called predictive programming. Here's the Meteor Storm trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpmNw-o-3PAAnd then there was "The Day After Tomorrow," released in 2004 to warn the public about climate changes caused by the approach of Planet X. It's on TV just about every week these days. Disruption of the North Atlantic current, which is wreaking havoc with the weather in England and other parts of Europe, is one of the changes addressed in the film. Watch the trailer here: http://youtube.com/watch?v=MFLncfCvPeY

Not to mention all the apocalyptic TV programs, such as "The Walking Dead," that depict a world in which there's no electricity, society has completely broken down and it's every man for himself -- just like the world that will be left behind after the pole shift. Producers of these programs know what's headed our way, and they're trying to warn the public by showing us what we're going to be up against.

Why else would there be such an idiotic and morbid fascination with zombies in popular culture?

There was even a scene from "The Walking Dead" that shows people walking down the road with two suns in the sky. Many thanks to the reader who pointed that out to me.

Now there's a new movie out called "Catastrophe," another veiled reference to Planet X. And how about the TV show, "Orange Is the New Black?" Orange represents Nibiru and black represents death.

And there are a ton of Nibiru references in this TV commercial produced by the U.S. Navy:
Nibiru references in U.S. Navy TV commercial

Corporate logos are also loaded with references to Planet X. This video exposes it, starting around the 4-minute mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2nxKAaDyJg

One reason why the economies of the world are deliberately being run into the ground is that governments know they'll never have to pay back all the money they've borrowed because there will be no one left to pay back! And a lot of the money that was stolen from the U.S. Treasury has gone into constructing underground bases and purchasing supplies for the self-appointed select few who think they deserve to survive and you deserve to die.

As one of my readers pointed out to me in an e-mail message, Planet X also explains GMO foods. They were created by Monsanto so they could be grown underground, because it might be years before anything can grow properly after Planet X passes by.

I believe former Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano was also alluding to Planet X during her retirement announcement in August 2013 when she warned that the United States is going to experience a natural disaster "the likes of which the nation has never seen before."

Only if you understand the truth about Planet X will you be able to understand the seemingly incomprehensible events taking place today.

Dr. Robert Harrington of the U.S Naval Observatory was assassinated in 1993 for his part in trying to disclose the reality of Planet X to the American people. See this: http://yowusa.com/planetx/2008/planetx-2008-05b/1.shtml

[...]

They also crashed into my car on purpose twice in recent years while I was driving it to punish me for talking about this subject and to discourage me from telling anyone else about it. I was rear-ended by a gang stalker in 2012 and suffered serious injuries.

But this matter is simply too important to cover up. Everyone needs to know the truth about what is about to transpire on Planet Earth before it's too late to prepare.

[...]

"Global warming" and "climate change" are cover stories for the effects that Planet X is causing on Earth and all the other planets in the solar system. All the planets are experiencing drastic changes as a result of the electromagnetic and gravitational forces exerted by this rogue planet.

Arctic ice is not melting because of global warming, it's melting because the Earth is heating up from the core outward. These disturbances are also causing earthquakes, volcano eruptions, sinkholes and bizarre weather and much more, and they will continue to increase in severity as Planet X approaches.

NASA and other government agencies have hired professional debunkers and other disinformation specialists to go on the Internet and convince you this is all a hoax, but it's not a hoax. The government just wants to lead you down the garden path because it wants people not to panic and to continue working and paying taxes (at least those who still have a job). Don't let the disinfo crew throw you off track. There's no reason to panic, just get educated on what to expect and how to survive it.

Ed Finn #moonbat #magick rabble.ca

Is COVID-19 Mother Nature’s latest effort to rid herself of the virus of humankind?

Back in the 1970s, chemist James Lovelock, with his associate microbiologist Lynn Marguilis, developed what they called the Gaia hypothesis: the theory that our planet is a sentient organism dedicated to promoting and protecting all forms of life.

Gaia is the ancestral name of the primal Earth goddess, whose regulation of all organic components of life — until the Industrial Revolution and the spread of capitalism — maintained a viable existence for humans and other creatures.

During the past 150 years, however, the operation of international trade and industry has steadily come under the control of “free enterprise” corporations. Their obsessive pursuit of profits for the rich and powerful, and the consequent poverty, hunger and inequality that has devastated nearly half the world’s population, have seriously sabotaged Gaia's global guardianship.

She has witnessed an alarming growth of human overpopulation; the pollution of the planet’s oceans, seas, lakes, rivers and soil; the contamination of its atmosphere with fossil fuel and carbon dioxide emissions; hacking down the rainforests; driving hundreds of animal and marine species to extinction; underdeveloping the planet’s renewable forms of energy, and — most tragically — raising global temperatures to lethally intolerable levels.

Lovelock surmised that humans have now pushed Gaia to her limit of toleration. In self-defence, she has been forced to treat humans as malignant invaders, whose many injurious activities have to be curbed.

She had hitherto confined her retaliatory measures to ramping up floods, droughts, hurricanes, wildfires and other climatic deterrents. But, these having proved ineffective, she has resorted to the imposition of a global pandemic onslaught. Unlike previous such epidemics, however, COVID-19 has two deadlier aspects: it proliferates very quickly, and (so far) has no vaccine.

For humans, such a virulent assault on their health, security, mobility, and social and economic welfare is an appalling experience. The sooner it can be overcome and their lives restored to normal, the better.

For Gaia, on the other hand, COVID-19’s effects are quite beneficial — not just in terms of restraining humans’ harmful activities, such as deforestation, destruction of biodiversity and the depletion of non-renewable resources — but also in helping moderate the baneful effects of human-generated global warming.

A major drop in travel by airplanes, cruise ships and motor vehicles — all significant CO2 emitters — has effectively cut greenhouse gas emissions and helped detoxify the atmosphere.

So has the shutdown of many factories and refineries — also big industrial polluters.

The main question that the COVID-19 pandemic raises is whether such a severe reprimand by Mother Earth — when it eventually runs its course — will be heeded and appropriately acted upon, or whether we will promptly return to our old reckless, asinine and ultimately suicidal ways.

If we take the latter self-destructive course, humankind’s future will be put in imminent jeopardy. With key economic, political, cultural and climate policies continuing to be set by capitalism’s profit-deranged CEOs and investors, hope for the human race’s survival will be inconceivable.

Gaia will of course survive. Over the millennia, she has overseen the rise and fall of many previous dominant lifeforms, from the dinosaurs and reptiles that ruled the planet for 175 million years to mammals and primates such as monkeys and apes, from whom humans eventually evolved.

The crucial distinction between humans and earlier mammals was that humans were endowed with a superior intelligence that, over time, led to hunting and gathering skills and then to farming and high-tech devices. Unfortunately, it also led to wars, poverty, inequality, overpopulation, capitalism and global warming.

If humans precipitate their own extinction, Mother Earth may have a role to play in supplanting us with a species that shuns conflict, greed, inequality and capitalism — and thus survives as long as the dinosaurs.

As we are confined by COVID-19 in our homes for the next several months, we might well contemplate the kind of society we would prefer to have in the aftermath of this crisis. It’s either a resumption of the perilous free-market status quo, or a firm commitment to the creation of a fair, safe, progressive, clean and epidemic-free environment.

The choice we make will shape the future of our children and grandchildren, and the fate of potential generations that may or may not succeed us.

PurpleRobe #fundie rr-bb.com

Smiling with you all and waiting for our ride. Some of the cute remarks in this thread reminded me of what I tell my Wed night preschool class if anyone wants to know what Heaven will be like. I just smile, get in really close and say, " Heaven is prettier than glitter!" Oh the looks on their faces cannot be described. Big wide eyed wows and smiles from ear to ear.
I believe our white robes will be prettier than glitter, as well.
Personally don't care where I am when He comes for us either. Just come, Lord Jesus.

Frank Einstein, MD #conspiracy identitydixie.com

[From "Dr. Gerberding or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Vaccines"]

Welcome my fellow goyim; my name is Dr. Frank Einstein and I am here to calm your uneasiness on the question of vaccines. Many of you may or may not know that here recently a lady was jailed due to the fact that she refused to follow the court order to vaccinate her child. The child thankfully has since been vaccinated. Nothing like a little government intervention to give Progress the boost it needs from time to time. Just imagine where the South would be if there had been no forced integration back in the sixties.

Now lets start off with the most ludicrous claim: vaccines cause Autism. As many of you know these claims have been around for quite sometime now and there have been countless studies debunking this fraudulent accusation. The fact that they refuse to do Double Blind Placebo test for most vaccinations is totally irrelevant. I mean how negligent and uncaring would our government have to be to mass-produce vaccines for the public without actually testing them for side affects, if they were potentially that harmful. If you want an example of the wrong way for a government to handle it look at Japan. They just simply banned the MMR vaccine after noticing a large part of the population started developing adverse affects (only including a few instances of Autism, blindness, and death). But what would you expect from a country that allows its schools to use Mein Kampf as “teaching material”. Another argument these delusional people will make, is that the minuscule amounts of heavy metals somehow cause it.

It’s not like the stuff is being injected directly into your child’s bloodstream. If anything this abrupt rise in Autism is a genetic defect due to homogeneous societies. Diversity, our greatest strength, will undoubtedly solve this within a few generations.

Of course there are a few other concerns like how the vaccine industry is set to make $61 billion dollars in profit by 2020. So what if international corporations make a lucrative profit off what you’re injecting into your children, just think of all the refugees they’ve saved by allowing them to acclimate to our society through the miracle of vaccines. Or how we have the highest rate of SIDS in the industrialized world and we are also the most heavily vaccinated. It’s just another freak coincidence my fellow goy, giving these coincidences too much attention can be dangerous. Before too long you’ll be buying into all these conspiracies about globalism and our greatest ally Israel. Speaking of this blessed race the American Jewish Committee gave Julie Gerberding their first ever Woman’s Global Leadership Award. She earned this from not only her tenure as the director of the CDC, but also her current career at Merck where she is the head of their vaccine division. She is truly a champion of global industry and health.

In closing I know there are a few things still not covered such as the infamous “vaccine court” among other things. Yes, there will still be naysayers, people not convinced by the facts so conveniently placed before them. This short essay will in no way placate all the emotional soccer moms enraged at the fact that their precious child may never become potty trained much less start a family of their own. They will have to search a little longer before they can so easily lay the blame elsewhere. I’m just here to remind those of you who aren’t yet too far gone that vaccines are 100% absolutely never ever going to be dangerous.

Don’t look into it. There’s no need. After all you can trust me, I’m a doctor.

angelforisrael #racist angelforisrael.wordpress.com

[Note: The sentences with dates after them are links to other articles]

Racism and Black on White Violence in Obamamerika Pt 3
image

Also see Racism and Black on White Violence in Obamamerika Pt 2

Jesse Jackson says NYPD officer is a murderer for not allowing black teen to shoot and kill another black teen 08/12/2013

Jesse Jackson says that white men who defend themselves from deadly attacks by black men are murderers. He says that black men are being “murdered by vigilantes, police, and security guards.” He then cite two cases, one of which is Shaaliver Douse.
The usual gang of black race hustlers are accusing the NYPD of shooting Douse without just cause.
10,865 Blacks Murdered by OTHER BLACKS Since Trayvon Died … Name One 07/18/2013

To be exact, the shameful truth is that 93% of African-American murders are committed by other African-Americans. That is breathtakingly awful when you consider how incensed the African-American community is about the Trayvon tragedy, no matter what you believe about Zimmerman’s guilt.

Media label black-mob violence ‘mischievous teens’ 04/01/2013

Chicago media are running out of ways to avoid talking about black mob violence.
Over the weekend, 500 black people rampaged through several Chicago neighborhoods: beating, pushing and attacking police and tourists and residents. Even a police horse.
Surge of black violence called ‘urban terrorism’ 01/30/2013

With dozens of episodes over the last five years, Indianapolis has to be near the top of any list of cities with sustained, violent, extensive and numerous cases of black mob violence. This “crisis” of “urban terrorism,” as the new chief of police calls it, is now a regular feature of life in this Midwestern city once thought to be a haven from racial turmoil. The latest examples are focused downtown at the Circle Centre Mall – a gleaming display of downtown redevelopment when it opened in 1996. This multi-story story retail center, connected by covered walkways to nine hotels and the convention center, was once anchored by Nordstrom.
‘Sambo, Uncle Tom n*gger': Self-appointed race cops unleash hate on Cosby and Barkley for Zimmerman remarks 07/19/2013

Think skin color should be the sole deciding factor in how someone thinks, speaks and acts? Then this is the crowd for you.
Cracker and Uncle Thomas 07/19/2013

I believe in giving credit where credit is due, and I’ve got to hand it to the Left – they are gifted moralizers. Nobody can put on a sanctimonious soapboxing spectacle like a Progressive Leftist. Do you believe, for whatever reason, that marriage is between one man and one woman? Then you’re a homophobe. Do you believe that men are generally taller and have larger biceps than women? Then you’re a sexist. Do you believe that people who move to America ought to come here legally and become American? Then you’re a nativist. Do you believe that 16 years of global temperature stability might mean that global warming isn’t actually happening? Then you’re a flat-earther. And, of course, if you disagree about any given issue with a Progressive, you’re a racist. Yep, they have all sorts of fancy words to describe how you don’t agree with them, and they use them all – a lot.
List: Violence, Lawlessness Since Zimmerman Verdict 07/18/2013

The same media that attempted to blame a mother of five in Wasilla, Alaska, for a mass shooting in Arizona (because of her use of standard crosshairs on a campaign map) is the same media that repeatedly described the shockingly lawless Occupy Wall Street movement as “mostly peaceful,” and is now attempting to persuade America that the anti-Zimmerman protests currently being ginned up by an NBC News anchor (MSNBC’s Al Sharpton) are also “mostly peaceful.”
Why Did The Obama Administration “Organize And Manage” Protests Against George Zimmerman? 07/10/2013

Is the Obama administration at least partially responsible for turning the George Zimmerman trial into such a huge national spectacle? Judicial Watch has obtained documents which prove that the Community Relations Service, a division of the Department of Justice, was sent to Sanford, Florida in late March 2012 “to help organize and manage rallies and protests against George Zimmerman“. This included spending quite a bit of money, arranging meetings between the NAACP and local leaders, and providing police escorts for protesters. Someone needs to ask Obama why the federal government was doing this.
History Lesson: Racist Democrats and the Big Lie 03/28/2013

And yet this myth persists — in fact, it’s just about the only response today’s Democrats have to their own sordid history: pinning it on the other guy. It makes them profoundly uncomfortable that among the 21 who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 can be found Albert Arnold Gore, Sr., the founder of the Hillbilly Dynasty; Robert “KKK” Byrd, the Conscience of the Senate; and Sleepin’ Sam Ervin of Watergate fame.
Violent threats follow Detroit takeover 03/28/2013

Jesse Jackson decries ‘plantocracy’ while warnings include disruptions, burning
The official state takeover of Detroit is only newly accomplished, and there are signs that there soon will be unrest, or worse.
Head of National Black Chamber of Commerce on Obama’s priorities: ‘This is not America’ 08/11/2013

Committed to successful black entrepreneurship, Harry C. Alford, Jr. has been president of the National Black Chamber of Commerce since 1993.
During that time, he has spoken out with increasing boldness against the liberal orthodoxy hurting the black community. In 2009, he took on Democratic California Sen. Barbara Boxer at a cap-and-trade hearing, and that video went viral. In this interview with Alford, he continues to boldly confront the politics of government dependency, which he believes stand opposed to the founding principles of capitalism, private property and opportunity.
How Obama Poisoned Race Relations in America By Arnold Ahlert 07/26/2013

A new poll by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal reveals that public perceptions about race relations in America have taken a devastating hit since the election of Barack Obama. At the beginning of the president’s first term, 79 percent of whites and 63 percent of blacks had a positive view of American race relations.

vexic929 #fundie comments.deviantart.com

[ You were bullied for being straight? Yeah, that's totally the same thing. >: Just like LGBT teens that are bullied and ostracized, you had no one to turn to in this society that is so against heterosexuals. You must have felt so isolated in an overwhelming homosexual culture that routinely teaches the younger generations to hate straight people for being born the way they are.

Okay seriously no, LGBT teen suicide is a /very serious/ problem that is steadily getting worse. Even if it focused on one group that is being bullied (and is being bullied /hard/), you don't support an end to the bullying of that group? Do you also get pissy when Black History month rolls around? Do you not support it? I mean, IT DOESN'T INCLUDE LATINOS. They're persecuted too. If we're going to follow your logic that EVERY awareness program must include EVERYONE, we should just make it 'Non white history month'. Boycott black history month, it's totes biased. >:< ]


I
was making a point in stating that. It irritates the crap out of me that this day was made for one group of people about a problem that affects EVERYONE. Everyone is bullied at some point in there life for some reason, it doesn't just affect LGBT. No, I don't get mad when Black History month comes around; why? Because it's about something that affected that specific group of people--the abolishment of slavery and the celebration of the accomplishments of people of that ethnicity.

[ I think it has a lot more to do with your general dislike of homosexuality than any good reasonI. :shrug: Would you be opposed to a 'Spirit Day' dedicated to kids committing suicide over racial bullying? What about 'Adopt a Shelter Dog' day? That doesn't include cats, so are you still pissed when all those sweet dogs get adopted? What about Breast Cancer awareness month? There's more than one type of cancer that affects patients. How about anxiety awareness week? There's more than one mental illness.

No one ever said it *just* effects LGBT. But the day was made in response to a string of suicides by LGBT teenagers- it's to honor them and prevent it from happening again. LGBT bullying is a /big fucking deal/ because the children affected by it live in a homophobic society and often, homophobic households. Unlike a straight kid or even a child of a minority race, they usually don't have a support system to turn to because of that; they can't open up to their families because they have to hide who they are. Having a voice- a day- raises a lot of awareness. That is a /good thing/. And there are plenty of anti-bullying programs that cover EVERY aspect of bullying; is it really so bad to have one dedicated to a specific type that happens to be very bad at the moment?

Basically, it's childish to be angry over what is essentially a good thing. Everyone knows bullying is bad, but there are plenty of people that don't realize how much more devastating it can be for LGBT teens due to the inherit isolation that typically comes with their status. This event /helps/ these kids. And it's ridiculously /heartless/ ]

You're willing to listen and are only looking for an argument (as made obvious by your comments on my other deviations). You won't find one here and responding would simply be a waste of my time, have a nice day.

[ Seriously, nice cop out. It seems to me that YOU are the one unwilling to listen and only interested in further entrenching yourself in your narrow-minded views. Are you so against an honest discourse? *Queerly was being nothing but polite and very articulate in outlining her thoughtful, well-reasoned responses.

Spirit week DOES bring awareness to all types of bullying- how could a week dedicated to bringing awareness not? It is simply targeted at awareness for LGBT youthes, a group which uniquely has less support than most others and thus is greatly in need of awareness. I'm sorry, but being bullied/made to feel guilty about being a heterosexual is nowhere NEAR the same thing, unless said heterosexual is immersed in a largely hostile HOMOsexual community. Were you? Did you have no hetero friends or family members to turn to? Were you afraid of even admitting it? Unless I'm horribly mistaken, of course not. ]

Considering you don't know the situation I can forgive you for calling it a "cop-out". On the contrary, she was anything but nice in her comments on my journal and stamps and was only aiming to make me angry and start an argument.

Furthermore, as I have stated numerous times, I don't think any one group should have a day for themselves when it affects everyone. And did you do any research on this subject? For one thing; it's not a week, it's a day. For another, until this year (and on deviantART only this year for that matter) I didn't see any awareness whatsoever on the day for anyone else who was bullied or any other type of bullying--hardly anyone at all acknowledged that (except for those of us who were irritated about it). And being bullied for another reason than being homosexual isn't the same thing? Since when? It hurts just the same and people are scared to turn to other people for help just the same. There's no difference other than the reason behind it. And to keep people from killing themselves? That's what TWLOHA is for (link provided in case you don't know what that is), which I wholeheartedly support because it focuses on how to solve the problem. It's not about one group saying "oh poor us, we're dealing with a problem everyone else deals with but we're more important!" which is pretty much exactly what Spirit Day is.

[ Well, I suppose you're correct that I haven't seen everything she has written to you, so I'll concede that, but I still think that it is a major cop-out to not respond to her last paragraph up there- I'd be very interested in your response to the points she raised which, as far as I'm concerned, are spot on and I couldn't have put it better.

Oh yes it's a day not a week, that does invalidate my stance. Was I also wrong on what it's about? Oh, no. So never mind it invalidates nothing. I'll admit I was reading quickly as I was a bit upset upon finding an individual who opposes something that I view as being very good and beneficial.

Plenty of groups have days/weeks/whatever devoted just to them- so, as *Queerly asked, do you oppose all of them as well? Or do you just oppose this because you also oppose what you see as a sinful "choice"? And I support your religious choices, it's perfectly fine for you to believe what you do, I'm certainly not attacking that, even if I disagree with it. But it shouldn't be affecting your opinion on how to treat LGBTs, on supporting a movement that is benefical for them, gives them help and awareness that they desperately need. Like I said, everyone knows bullying is bad. IT HAS AWARENESS. Not everyone knows however what is happening to LGBT youthes, and worse, in some of the more hostile areas, it is IGNORED.

Bullying of LGBT is different. How man times do I have to say this? It doesn't "hurt the same"- perhaps it might appear that way to you, if you are lucky enough to live in an area where LGBTs aren't living in constant fear- but let me tell you, that is not the norm. What makes bullying of LGBTS so different is that they are being bullied in a society where they cannot just turn to the adults for help- a society at large that is hostile and often teaches others to hate them. Which is what makes it different from, say, racial bullying, where those children at least have family to turn to and no one says 'you shouldn't have chosen to be black, put some on dye your skin!'

You know what I did when I was bullied? I talked to my mom, my friends, once even the teacher and guidance counseler.

Do you know what *Queerly did when she was bullied? Withdraw in to herself, far too afraid for her safety in her conservative southern community to go to the teacher, and too sick at heart to be able to admit her true issues to her parents out of fear of rejection/hurting them/making them question their beliefs.

To sum it up, I would like to ask what *Queerly asked before she was blocked:
Would you be opposed to a 'Spirit Day' dedicated to kids committing suicide over racial bullying? What about 'Adopt a Shelter Dog' day? That doesn't include cats, so are you still pissed when all those sweet dogs get adopted? What about Breast Cancer awareness month? There's more than one type of cancer that affects patients. How about anxiety awareness week? There's more than one mental illness.

Like I said, groups getting needed awareness isn't a new thing.

I'm not trying to upset you or argue with you for no reason, and you are certainly entitled to your beliefs. However, I am as well and I will try and implore you to stop fighting something that is a good thing. While I myself have seen plenty of LGBT awareness movements, if you yourself have not, then that proves that they need the day, or week, or whatever it is that they're given in whatever way, more than ever.

There are lots of issues in the world. No day or week or movement could cover them all. In this case, this day covers LGBT bullying. I ask again, what the heck is so bad with that?? ]

And this is why I don't think you or Queerly were even listening, I have stated my reasons very clearly NUMEROUS times, including in my responses to both you and her and you continue to ignore them. Since you won't listen to me when I straight out reply with my answers maybe you should try reading some of the other comments, the artist's comments, etcetera which all state what I have said a thousand times. I'm getting pretty sick of being asked the same questions over and over and then not even being listened to when I answer. And before replying I would like to ask you to please do your research--there is nothing, I repeat, NOTHING that sets LGBT bullying apart from other types of bullying other than media coverage and extensive whining. They all have different degrees of severity, the only difference is--like with most minorities--when they are targeted they have the media freaking out and jumping to conclusions.

Here are some interesting statistics: 1 in every 4 kids from elementary to high school is bullied; only 30% of those are bullied because of their sexual orientation. Over 50% of students who were bullied were bullied because of their physical appearance. Only 4% of bullying cases end with adult intervention, 11% of bullying cases end with peer intervention, and 85% of bullying cases have absolutely no intervention--regardless of the reasons behind the bullying.

And, as I stated before, the degree of severity varies with each case, there is nothing to show that an LGBT kid suffers more or less than any other kid who is bullied (unless, of course, you look at one of the extremely biased websites that completely ignores the statistics of a child who isn't LGBT being bullied--unfortunately there are many out there, the majority of which can't seem to even keep a standardized statistic). If you still insist that this day is needed might I recommend you also create a day for every other child who is bullied for whatever reason; go on, make a day for those who are bullied because they are overweight, skinny, tall, short, heterosexual, smart, stupid, non-athletic, mentally-disabled, physically-disabled, "nerdy", poor, rich, black, hispanic, white, asian, unpopular, has a speech impediment, has frizzy hair, has stick-straight hair, doesn't have a boyfriend/girlfriend, stands up for another child who is bullied...need I say more?

[ You truly don't believe that growing up in a society that is hostile towards you and in which you generally are too afraid to speak out doesn't differentiate LGBT bullying from, to use your list, "overweight, skinny, tall, short, heterosexual, smart, stupid, non-athletic, mentally-disabled, physically-disabled, "nerdy", poor, rich, black, hispanic, white, asian, unpopular, has a speech impediment, has frizzy hair, has stick-straight hair, doesn't have a boyfriend/girlfriend, stands up for another child who is bullied"?

If your answer is yes, then I suppose our conversation is at an end because you are correct, we are simply talking in circles. But if you believe that LGBT kids are just whining about their issues as exacerbated by the media... I'm sorry, but I would say that people like you are the reason awareness movements are needed.

Also if you're going to use statistics, please include source links. ]

If you haven't noticed, most people are the exact opposite of hostile towards them nowadays (kids don't necessarily count, children can be very cruel about everything). Such people are actually pretty much glorified (see LGBT celebrities and politicians) now. I've noticed more people being hostile towards me and several of my non-LGBT friends for having a different opinion on homosexuality than I have seen or heard of any sort of hostility towards my LGBT friends (not simply in the area I live in, I have many friends from other countries, states, and cities).

You misunderstand what I'm trying to say. I'm not saying that horrible stuff doesn't happen to LGBT kids and that they're only whining (although they [not all of them] tend to do a heck of a lot of it; as do most minorities), I'm simply pointing out that it doesn't ONLY happen to them so it doesn't make sense and is unfair to create a day just for them, regardless of how much awareness it raises.

There were mountains of sources most of which have been long since lost I'm afraid but a quick Google search of "LGBT bullying statistics" and just "bullying statistics" should bring up the vast majority of them.

isawmysister #fundie reddit.com

This is more geared towards relationship advice and I have posted on different subreddits to get the best advice possible.

My sister Lily(fake name)is not only my sister, but my best friend as well.She is beautiful,kind,intelligent,and very likable.She does charity work like helping our church on food drives and volunteering at a soup kitchen for the homeless.She did something very wrong, but I believe she is a good person.My brother Luke(fake name) is not biologically related to me or the rest of our family, but that doesn't really matter.7 years ago my mom's best friends(Luke's biological parents) died in an automobile accident and our family decided to adopt him.Regardless of genetics Luke is my brother and I love him and care for hm.

In short I caught my sister molesting my younger brother Luke.This has apparently been going on for months and my sister begged me not to tell my parents.However after long thought,prayer,and posting to r/changemyview I decided to tell my parents.

My parents freaked out and kicked Lily out.Even though I begged them not to they went to the police.I called Lily and she told me that she understood why I told our parents and that she still loves me and Luke.My parents saw that I was contacting Lily and they forbade me from contacting her.They told me that they love Lily in spite of what she did and they know that I love Lily.However, what Lily did was wrong and we have to cut off contact with Lily and perhaps in the future we can reconnect with her and bring her back into the family.

My brother is in therapy right now and my parents came and asked me if I wanted to see a therapist.I told them no because not only do I not need it, but I don't want to divert any attention Luke can get.My sister is my rock.She is always there for advice and whenever I'm trouble.I trust her,love her,and care for her.Not being able to talk to her and offer support in a time where she is going through so much is killing me.After all Lily always supported me through my troubles.

I keep pleading with my parents to let me contact her, but they are firm in their decision to not let me contact her.I keep second guessing my decision to tell my parents because not only do I miss not having my sister, the consequences she face may be enormous.

My parents are Presbyterian so I wanted to form a Christian argument to why they should allow me to have contact with my sister again and that's why I'm here.

Does anybody have any advice on what I should say to my parents for this to work?

It means that you need to decide who you care about more: your younger brother, or your younger brother's RAPIST. Have you even considered how your behaviour is impacting on your brother?

If you love him as much as your sister you should show it, and stop trying to keep this connection to his abuser. You are HURTING your family and they will resent you for it in the end, if they don't already.

You need to grow up and realise that your sister is not the person you thought she was. She's a child abuser and the fact that you're choosing this abuser over your brother is astonishing to me.

You seem to be incapable of recognising that what you're doing is actively harmful. You NEED therapy. And the fact that you're constantly posting this on different subreddits and deleting it when you don't get the validation you want shows that deep down you know this is wrong. PLEASE, get therapy. Your choices now could affect your entire future with your family.

If it comes down to my brother or my sister.......Well I won't lie, I'll choose my sister even though what she did was wrong.

Yes,my sister is a child abuser, but does that mean I should stop loving her?

Also I'm not harming anybody right now.I just want to talk to her on the occasion.My brother will never know.How am I hurting anybody by talking to my sister?

Wow. WOW. You will choose to support a pedophile over her victim. This is absolutely abhorrent on every level, and trying to hide behind your faith will not work.
You ARE harming people - your parents are dealing with what your sister did, trying to make sure this doesn't ruin your brother's life and ON TOP OF THAT you're trying to force them into accepting this continued contact with the person who has caused all this in the first place! This is undoubtedly causing harm, and you're trying to justify that to make yourself feel better. You are an incredibly selfish person.

Actually maybe you should move out and stay in contact with your brother's rapist, you sound like you deserve each other.

I'm sorry, but I won't stop loving my sister.If Jesus loved and forgave humanity for our sins shouldn't I at the very least attempt to be like Jesus and love my sister?

Michael Biggs #transphobia #conspiracy 4thwavenow.com

The Open Society Foundations & the transgender movement

The transgender movement has transformed cultural norms and social institutions at breathtaking speed. Most of us, becoming acquainted with the trans issue for the first time, are astonished to discover the extent of the gender revolution. The movement has accomplished in a few years what the movements for women’s and for gay and lesbian rights took many decades to achieve.

Part of the explanation is the amount of money behind transgenderism. The Gender Industrial Complex, as we may call it, has many components. Lucrative sponsorship comes from pharmaceutical companies and medical providers. Charities originally established to fight for homosexual rights (like Human Rights Campaign in the United States and Stonewall in Britain) wield large budgets. Last but not least, three American billionaires have bankrolled the transgender movement on a global scale: Jennifer Pritzker, whose activities were detailed in another blogpost, Jon Stryker, and George Soros.

This blogpost focuses on the Open Society Foundations (OSF), funded by Soros. This is not easy to discuss because he is vilified by right-wingers, whose criticism sometimes degenerates into anti-semitism (Williamson 2018). Therefore those of us who are liberal or progressive tend to react instinctively by dismissing any scrutiny of Soros out of hand. This is unjustified, as I will show by providing some facts about how OSF has funded the transgender movement.

OSF fully supports the objectives of transgender activists. Self-identification is “an essential legal right for trans people” (OSF 2014a). In other words, biological sex must be superseded by subjective gender identity, to include options “outside the binary categories of male and female” (OSF 2014b). Identity should not be “governed by age restrictions” (OSF 2014b). Therefore OSF funds “trans-led or LGBT organizations that promote progressive, rights-based processes for legal gender recognition” (OSF 2014a). It also advocates access to “hormonal therapy, counseling, and gender-affirming surgeries” on demand (OSF 2014a). This includes puberty blockers for youth (OSF 2013).

How much has OSF spent to promote the transgender movement? In 2011–13, it spent $3.19 million, which made it the top funder, followed by Stryker’s Arcus Foundation and Pritzker’s Tawani Foundation (Funders for LBTQ Issues 2015). OSF’s current database includes grants worth $3.07 million for 2016–17 (searching for keywords “trans” and “transgender”). The largest recipients in this current tranche are the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association ($642,000), Global Action for Trans Equality ($500,000), and Transgender Europe ($500,000).

open society reception areaThree million dollars on trans issues is a tiny fraction of OSF’s total expenditure, merely 0.3% (OSF 2017). Crucially, however, this funding greatly exceeds the resources given to alternative voices. This website, for example, receives no funding. To illustrate the difference that money can make, consider the commemoration of the victims of violence.

As we saw, OSF gave $500,000 to Transgender Europe in the past two years. Transgender Europe also received $1,072,000 from the Arcus Foundation from 2010 to 2017 (Arcus Foundation 2018). The organization’s projects include the Transgender Day of Remembrance, which is underpinned by a comprehensive database of victims throughout the world, Trans Murder Monitoring. This database counted 325 trans victims of violence in year from October 2016 to September 2017 (TMM 2017). The great majority of these occurred in Central and South America. There were only three in Western Europe, and thankfully none in the United Kingdom. Surprisingly, perhaps, the Transgender Day of Remembrance was widely observed in Britain in November 2017. In many universities, for example, candles were lit for each of the victims, the transgender flag was raised, speakers were invited, and services held. Searching university websites (the domain .ac.uk), we find over 2,800 webpages containing the phrase “Transgender Day of Remembrance”.

While no transgender person was murdered in the United Kingdom in 2017, 138 women were killed by men, including murders where a man was the principal suspect (Smith 2018). These data were compiled by Karen Ingala Smith, who receives no funding for this work. She started recording such deaths in 2009, under the rubric of Counting Dead Women. This was developed into the Femicide Census—in partnership with Women’s Aid—with minimal funding and pro-bono support by two legal firms (Femicide Census 2016).

Despite the diligent research over many years, this has left barely a trace in British universities. The equivalent search on their websites yields fewer than a hundred webpages containing the phrases “Femicide Census” or “Counting Dead Women”.

To sum up, more than a hundred women are murdered each year in the United Kingdom at the hands of males, but no day has been set aside to commemorate their deaths. Transgender murders are exceedingly rare—eight in the past decade (Trans Crime UK 2017; Evening Standard 2018)—and yet they have an institutionalized day of remembrance. Even if we consider the homicide rate rather than the number of homicides, Nicola Williams demonstrates that transgender people are no more likely to become victims than are women (Fairplay for Women 2017).

The prominence of transgender victims, compared to the virtual invisibility of female victims, is partly explained by the amount of resources devoted to compiling evidence and promoting commemoration. Thus funding from large American charities like OSF—along with the Arcus and Tawani Foundations—shapes the political climate in Britain and around the world.

Johann Hari #fundie news.independent.co.uk

I am standing waist-deep in the Pacific Ocean, both chilling and burning, indulging in the polite chit-chat beloved by vacationing Americans. A sweet elderly lady from Los Angeles is sitting on the rocks nearby, telling me dreamily about her son. "Is he your only child?" I ask. "Yes," she says. "Do you have a child back in England?" she asks. No, I say. Her face darkens. "You'd better start," she says. "The Muslims are breeding. Soon, they'll have the whole of Europe."

I am getting used to these moments – when gentle holiday geniality bleeds into... what? I lie on the beach with Hillary-Ann, a chatty, scatty 35-year-old Californian designer. As she explains the perils of Republican dating, my mind drifts, watching the gentle tide. When I hear her say, " Of course, we need to execute some of these people," I wake up. Who do we need to execute? She runs her fingers through the sand lazily. "A few of these prominent liberals who are trying to demoralise the country," she says. "Just take a couple of these anti-war people off to the gas chamber for treason to show, if you try to bring down America at a time of war, that's what you'll get." She squints at the sun and smiles. " Then things'll change."

I am travelling on a bright white cruise ship with two restaurants, five bars, a casino – and 500 readers of the National Review. Here, the Iraq war has been "an amazing success". Global warming is not happening. The solitary black person claims, "If the Ku Klux Klan supports equal rights, then God bless them." And I have nowhere to run.

From time to time, National Review – the bible of American conservatism – organises a cruise for its readers. I paid $1,200 to join them. The rules I imposed on myself were simple: If any of the conservative cruisers asked who I was, I answered honestly, telling them I was a journalist. Mostly, I just tried to blend in – and find out what American conservatives say when they think the rest of us aren't listening.

Mark Dice #fundie blog.myspace.com

[Title : Borat is Fraud and Pedophile.]

The hit comedy, "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan" should be renamed, "Borat: Pedophile Freak Who Jokes about Rape and Bestiality For Make Downfall of Society."

This movie is horrible in so many ways I have a hard time writing about it because I'd rather just forget about it. Aside from the film being a fraud in the sense that countless scenes were staged with actors while made to look like segments from candid camera, the low brow "humor" in "Borat" sinks to a new low. More on the hoaxed scenes later. I urge everyone who has not seen this movie to keep it that way. Save yourself and your stomach the trouble of witnessing some of the most satanic humor ever seen in theaters.

Some of the jokes include, but are not limited to: Borat enthusiastically joking about having sex with children as young as 10 years old. Borat joking about his mother being raped. Borat insulting Jews. Borat insulting Christianity. Scenes of Borat masturbating in public. A scene of Borat defecating in public. A Scene of Borat and his producer wrestling while completely naked while simulating sex acts. Borat showering with homosexuals who came to his hotel room with a rubber fist sex toy. And last and most disturbing, a scene where Borat is bragging about the size of his son's penis and shows a photo of him smiling and giving a thumbs up right in front of his fully nude son. That's right, the film includes simulated child porn with Borat's head just inches away from the supposed child's genitals while smiling. Most people in the theater loved it too.

It's unfortunate that none of these points were brought to light in the reviews because I could have saved myself 10 bucks and some visual images I'd rather have never seen at all. This comes as a great disappointment to this writer, because I had been a big fan of the Ali G and Borat characters played by Sacha Baron Cohen. In the past Cohen had been able to show how ignorant supposedly intelligent people were from top politicians like Newt Gingrich, to business executives and NBA stars, but sadly Borat has taken a turn for the worse in this mistake of a film.

Aside from satanic toilet humor and pedophilia being the center point of the film, it is also sad that most of the film is a fraud. Fans of Borat including myself (make that a former fan), expected to see Borat pull the wool over people's eyes in the typical candid camera style setup, but what the film contains are nothing more that staged scenes using actors. OK, a FEW of the scenes are legitimate, but most are completely scripted for the film. It would be funny if Borat was able to "punk" Pamela Anderson, but instead what we got was a pathetic acting attempt by Pamela which makes her work in Baywatch seem worthy of an Oscar. She was obviously "in on it" and so were half of the other people he supposedly "got."

I'm so mad I don't even want to write anymore about this piece of crap movie and the garbage and faked scenes in it. Borat is a fraud. A pedophile. A sick, sick individual, whose skill at comedy must have been left on the cutting room floor because it can't be found in this sorry excuse for a comedy.

Gr8tGooglyMoogly #fundie hollywoodreporter.com

Sure they are! We are at a point where it is Good vs Evil and your side has nothing to do with good!
Leftist:
* kill babies
* no borders
* destroy capitalism
* lie,cheat,steal
* force others to be open to phag lifestyle
* avoid any personal responsibility
* zero discipline in schools
* Live off the backs of hard workers while wasting their minds and bodies with drugs!
* participation trophies for last place so wittle feelings don't get hurt
* OWS movement, one messed up orgy of drug attics.
* believe global warming cause we say it is real
* indoctrinate our youth with failed liberalism as ideology
* Common Core Garbage
* the only time Liberal/Progressive aren't freaking out is if you agree with their twisted views! Fascists Scum that they are!

No quality, redeeming traits to speak of! YOUR TIME WILL COME!

josh1313 #fundie rr-bb.com

(On advocates of Global Warming)

What these people are advocating is not taking care of God's creation. They believe that the earth's population needs to be brought down to about 500 million so they can control this. These people are about having control over other people. It's all about power and has nothing to do with being good stewards. Alot of the proponents of this stuff are in fact wiccans and witches of some sort who actually do worship "Mother Earth".

Sumantra Maitra #wingnut thefederalist.com

Climate Worship Is Nothing More Than Rebranded Paganism
We're seeing sexualized dances, hallucinogens, worshiping nature, confessing sins in pagan animism, worshiping purified teen saints, all to promote a supposedly greater cause.

Lynn Townsend White Jr., an American historian from Princeton, wrote an influential essay in 1967, at the height of the cultural revolution in Western campuses, arguing that Christianity and Judeo-Christian values are responsible for ecological disaster and climate change. The essay, naturally, was adapted by generations after, ironically almost like a document of faith.

The central argument went like this. White argued, “The victory of Christianity over paganism was the greatest psychic revolution in the history of our culture. … By destroying pagan animism, Christianity made it possible to exploit nature in a mood of indifference to the feelings of natural objects.”

If nothing else, the last few days should be enough to prove that Western civilization, a product of more than 1,500 years of Judeo-Christian values, is facing its most significant and sustained challenge in centuries from tribalistic paganism, a force that seeks not only to turn back time but essentially to destroy the entire current edifice.

Greta Thunberg and the Church of Mother Earth
As secular liberalism destroyed the fundamental ties that bind society — faith, flag, and family — the human instincts for faith — to believe, worship, submit, and fear — didn’t just go away but manifested in various other pre-civilized tribal ways. For example, a liberal seminary encouraged its students to skip classes to pray and confess sins in front of potted plants. In Switzerland, 250 people in full funereal garb mourned the apparent approaching death of a glacier.

That is why members of “Extinction Rebellion” do what they do. Extinction Rebellion is an apocalyptic cult that wants to radically end every thing around you, from your private cars to the burgers you eat and the plastic chairs in your yard. It is a cult that was formed after its founder took psychedelic drugs and prayed for “social change.” Members have blocked D.C. and London intersections, “twerking” the way people in a pre-civilized era would perform a fertility dance to pray to Gaia.

And then there’s Saint Greta, our perpetual teen of sorrow. I have been comparing her worship to Joan of Arc ever since she was invited to the British Parliament, the birthplace of modern democracy. She was surrounded by buffoons nodding their heads like they were listening to gospel truth.

Lads, I hesitate to take credit for my predictions…I am magnanimous and noble like that…but this entire Joan of Arc thingy…you guys read it here, first.

"Climate Apocalypticism" is simply a paganist religion, with its own saints, sinners, and providential end. pic.twitter.com/YF5VmGfGVl

— Mr Maitra (@MrMaitra) September 22, 2019

I wrote about her long before the new woke-capital fanatics adopted her as a pawn. In a recent speech to the U.N., while clearly having an emotional meltdown, she told assorted leaders, voice trembling, that they have failed the children and history wouldn’t be kind. The “gatekeepers” immediately hailed her as a brave savior as well as a vulnerable, autistic teen who shouldn’t be bullied.

So, there you have it. Sexualized dances, psychedelic hallucinogens, worshiping nature, confessing sins in pagan animism, worshiping purified teen saints, and throwing them up on an altar, bereft of their childhood, to promote a greater cause. Add to that witches hexing Brett Kavanaugh, and having an Ouija board to invoke the spirit of Karl Marx, and everything old is new again.

The reality is, of course, completely different. Much less than destroying the planet, climate change isn’t even a settled science. Conservatives don’t disagree that climate is changing. That is a straw man. Conservatives, however, are opposed to hysteria, have skepticism about the rate of the climate change, and would like to see an actual cost-benefit analysis of the radical changes being demanded.

More important than that, conservatives understand that climate change is cynically used by a certain section of people to justify their political goals of steering the West away from its way of life, a way they perceive to be evil and harmful, hetero-patriarchal, and capitalist. How? Appealing to the faith-based part of human brains, the need for subservience, and propping up children as human shields.

The Left Created a Climate Crisis and Worships It
Consider a new letter by more than 500 scientists, which the mainstream media completely ignored. It urges the United Nations to have an open debate between scientists from both sides of the argument and states there’s “no climate emergency.” The report goes on to say, among other things:

The world has warmed at less than half the originally-predicted rate; Climate policy relies on inadequate models; More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth; There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent; There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.

In short, everything you’re being told is wrong or flawed, and you’re a chump who is being taken for a ride.

For all the Marxists’ faults, the old left at least wanted to conquer nature instead of turning subservient to it. Of course, that went to its own extremes, but one can imagine Joseph Stalin putting all twerking climate fanatics as mentally ill people in a forced labor camp to build railroads in Siberia. The current Chinese government, likewise, gives two hoots about climate change, and for all the bravery of Green Peace and St. Greta, there’s nothing they can do about China burning more coal than the rest of humanity combined.

The modern left is a combination of two of the worst impulses in human history. First are the ultra-privileged bourgeoisie, which, having lost their old Judeo-Christian faith, are instinctively attracted to pre-civilized rituals, from overt sexuality to fewer familial ties. Consider Late Roman public orgies, and you get an idea. At the same time, human minds feel a gaping void that still needs to be filled by an alternate faith. It is in that intersection where this occultist, apocalyptic climate paganism comes from. It gives some privileged people a noble purpose.

As French philosopher Pascal Bruckner wrote in his book “The Fanaticism of the Apocalypse: Save the Earth, Punish Human Beings,” the current movement has all the trappings of a religion: saints, sinners, a providential end, apocalyptic fear, punishment, and penance. It appears Emperor Constantine’s children clearly failed to civilize their future generations. The pagan barbarians from the north are back circling outside the citadel.

Zen Gardner #conspiracy thesleuthjournal.com

These changes are not due to “global warming”. Certainly the climate goes through changes and the solar cycles and other natural influences directly affect the earth, with minimal effects from mankind’s doing. Except one. The ongoing insane geoengineering programs in their effort to control the weather are a known and thoroughly tracked program and more responsible for these types of freak rain and snow events and record drought conditions than anything else. Chemtrailing is being seen all over the earth. This has consequences. Massive spraying over the Pacific is being used, amongst other things, to divert precipitable clouds and moisture up and around California and is causing catastrophic drought conditions in California, while the unnaturally driven rainfall drops in areas that barely need it, often bringing huge temperature fluctuations, drought, flood conditions and massive, unnatural hail and snowfalls.

Various trolls #fundie mediamatters.org

Chase NotMyPussyGrabber • 25 minutes ago

Trannys can pay for their own mutilations, nobody in America wants to pay for fake boobs on Chelsea manning

Conservative Finnibar87 • a few seconds ago

George bought and paid for phony dirt from Russia. #realrussiancollusion

Conservative The_C_a_t • a few seconds ago

Finish the story. The republican for some reason didn't run with it, most likely because it was unsubstantiated, so Fusion GPS aka George Soros picked it up and ran with it. The bottom line is George Soros, James Comey, and the DNC used phony Russian lies to smear President Trump. This means it's the democrats who are the real colluders with Russia.

at Woods Wolf Tracker • a minute ago

http://www.geocraft.com/WVF...

Water vapor causes global warming you ignorant diseased ladyboy......!!!!!!

Conservative Finnibar87 • a few seconds ago

Anything is better than the Washington DC insider globalist administration of Barry the liar.


-
Avatar
Pat Woods Conservative • in a few seconds

Isn't Barry that gay Kenyan Muslim community organizer.........?

SilkyF0Rever • 6 minutes ago

"E" Took a survey on a new reboot of the "Odd Couple" starring O.J. and Brucilla Jenner.
99.9% of liberals say that they can't wait to masturbate to it.
Today's word boys and girls is
"FREAK!"

tunce #fundie fstdt.com

So what a piece of ice fell into the water. You don't think this ever happened before the Devil created the fairy tail religion of global warming? Don't you people that think this garbage (that's right I called it garbage) is real have Faith in our King, the Lord of Lords who controls Nature? Do you not understand that this is all predestined and there is an appointed time for all things? Just wait until these knuckle heads see what God can really do with the sun. For in the Trib 1/3 of the earth will be scorched by the sun and you know what, the sun will be cut in half during this period. Wow half the energy of the sun that we feel today burning the planet up. Man made my rear end!

Oh ye of little faith, I think everyone needs to go read Mathew Chapter 8 and ponder what Christ is telling us. For he is in total control, you are free from fear mongering people that control the media. Stop putting your faith in man for he is controlled by the Prince of the Air and will fail you repeatedly. You need you wake up and understand that the Lord of All has ultimate authority over nature!

Lord Christopher Monckton #conspiracy wnd.com

Entire books have been written about the problems with the “birth certificate” that was released by the White House purportedly documenting Barack Obama’s birth in Hawaii.

Computer imaging experts have found it to be fraudulent and the conclusion of an official law enforcement investigation assembled by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is that it is just not real.

But it wasn’t until now, through the work of the Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, that the world was informed just exactly what the odds are against all of those anomalies occurring naturally.

One in 62,500,000,000,000,000,000. (That’s 62.5 quintillion)

Or, if one prefers, the chances are 0.0000000000000000000016 that those curious developments happened by accident.

The question at hand is whether Obama is constitutionally qualified for the office, under the Constitution’s requirement that presidents be a “natural born citizen.” Some say even if he was born in Hawaii, he wouldn’t qualify, because of his father’s foreign student status. Many believe a “natural born citizen” is the offspring of two citizen parents.

Monckton previously has advised Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher about the fallacies of global warming, has written for the Yorkshire Post, was editor of the Catholic paper The Universe, managing editor of the Telegraph Sunday Magazine, assistant editor of Today, and consulting editor of the Evening Standard.

Kajm #wingnut deviantart.com

Why the rise of Nationalism worldwide?

By Victor Davis Hanson, Townhall:

(My thoughts in bold / parens)

What is going on with the unending Brexit drama, the aftershocks of Donald Trump's election and the "yellow vests" protests in France? What drives the growing estrangement of southern and eastern Europe from the European Union establishment? What fuels the anti-EU themes of recent European elections and the stunning recent Australian re-election of conservatives?

Put simply, the middle classes are revolting against Western managerial elites. The latter group includes professional politicians, entrenched bureaucrats, condescending academics, corporate phonies and propagandistic journalists.

What are the popular gripes against them?

One, illegal immigration and open borders have led to chaos. Lax immigration policies have taxed social services and fueled multicultural identity politics, often to the benefit of boutique leftist political agendas. (and knifings, beheadings, acid-throwings, bombings, running down people with trucks)

Two, globalization enriched the cosmopolitan elites who found worldwide markets for their various services. New global markets and commerce meant Western nations outsourced, offshored and ignored their own industries and manufacturing (or anything dependent on muscular labor that could be replaced by cheaper workers abroad).

Three, unelected bureaucrats multiplied and vastly increased their power over private citizens. The targeted middle classes lacked the resources to fight back against the royal armies of tenured regulators, planners, auditors, inspectors and adjustors who could not be fired and were never accountable.

Four, the new global media reached billions and indoctrinated rather than reported. ('firefighters' *spit*)

Five, academia became politicized as a shrill agent of cultural transformation rather than focusing on education -- while charging more for less learning. (Evergreen State College, for example)

Six, utopian social planning increased housing, energy and transportation costs. (wind turbines. giving homes to the homeless WITHOUT accountability)

One common gripe framed all these diverse issues: The wealthy had the means and influence not to be bothered by higher taxes and fees or to avoid them altogether. Not so much the middle classes, who lacked the clout of the virtue-signaling rich and the romance of the distant poor.

In other words, elites never suffered the firsthand consequences of their own ideological fiats.

Green policies were aimed at raising fees on, and restricting the use of, carbon-based fuels. But proposed green belt-tightening among hoi polloi was not matched by a cutback in second and third homes, overseas vacations, luxury cars, private jets and high-tech appurtenances. (Bernie, gore, Pelosi, Michael moore, most Hollywood actors, the permanent 'climate change' bureaucracy)

In education, government directives and academic hectoring about admissions quotas and ideological indoctrination likewise targeted the middle classes but not the elite. The micromanagers of Western public schools and universities often preferred private academies and rigorous traditional training for their own children. Elites relied on old-boy networks to get their own kids into colleges. Diversity administrators multiplied at universities while indebted students borrowed more money to pay for them.

In matters of immigration, the story was much the same. Western elites encouraged the migration of indigent, unskilled and often poorly educated foreign nationals who would ensure that government social programs -- and the power of the elites themselves -- grew. The champions of open borders made sure that such influxes did not materially affect their own neighborhoods, schools and privileged way of life.

Elites masked their hypocrisy by virtue-signaling their disdain for the supposedly xenophobic, racist or nativist middle classes. Yet the non-elite have experienced firsthand the impact on social programs, schools and safety from sudden, massive and often illegal immigration from Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and Asia into their communities.

As for trade, few still believe in "free" trade when it remains so unfair. Why didn't elites extend to China their same tough-love lectures about global warming, or about breaking the rules of trade, copyrights and patents? (Because communism / socialism. Free Pass!)


The middle classes became nauseated by the constant elite trashing of their culture, history and traditions, including the tearing down of statues, the Trotskyizing of past heroes, the renaming of public buildings and streets, and, for some, the tired and empty whining about "white privilege."

If Western nations were really so bad, and so flawed at their founding, why were millions of non-Westerners risking their lives to reach Western soil?

How was it that elites themselves had made so much money, had gained so much influence, and had enjoyed such material bounty and leisure from such a supposedly toxic system -- benefits that they were unwilling to give up despite their tired moralizing about selfishness and privilege?

In the next few years, expect more grassroots demands for the restoration of the value of citizenship. There will be fewer middle-class apologies for patriotism and nationalism. The non-elite will become angrier about illegal immigration, demanding a return to the idea of measured, meritocratic, diverse and legal immigration.

Because elites have no answers to popular furor, the anger directed at them will only increase until they give up -- or finally succeed in their grand agenda of a non-democratic, all-powerful Orwellian state.

townhall.com/columnists/victor…

-------

I would also add groups like #BLM and Antifa- the Enforcement arm. Just like the Brown Shirts.

Power Point Paradise #conspiracy powerpointparadise.com

Max Keiser is a funny guy. He makes you laugh. I like Stacy Herberts too. They are both attractive people with nice personalities, apart from Max getting a bit lifted up sometimes. But hey, if you knew as much about money as he does, then you could almost be forgiven for being proud.(?) But are they really knowledgeable all around?

Every time we look at his videos, like those below, you feel your blood curdling within yourself, as Max exposes the Banksters for what they “really are”.– At least he paints the banksters blacker than any mainstream media, that, regardless, continue to invite Max back for interviews! Only if God would paint the Goldman Sachs Mafia, they’d come out blacker than that. Nevertheless, it seems like Max tells it “like it is!”

[...]

The big question I have, is, “Why do the PTB allow him to speak truth to power, like he does? Why do the Bankster-controlled Western Mainstream media invite him back, again and again?” Of course the more well-informed among us realise that a few interviews with Max Keiser is not going to change the situation to a “lily-white” financial system. That would be one without usury. Forget it! Pandora’s box can never be closed again.

That’s one reason why the Globalists are trying to destroy the Muslim world via imminent WW3, because they just can’t beat the much more righteous Muslim banking system, which forbids usury. The Muslims aren’t yet fully under the control of the International Banksters, and their global central banks. [...]

So WHO is Max Keiser. He refers to 9-11 being a hoax, he exposes the “black boxes” of non accountable controlling banks, even the controlling nexus, the Bank of International Settlements, and shouts very loudly about their perfidy, blackmail, “financial terrorism”, theft from taxpayers, “unconscionable huge bonuses stolen from taxpayers”, the IMF causing trillions of dollar global debts, their “economic hitmen”, which are the same people as Goldman Sachs, and other Wall Street banksters. He is permitted to rake them all over the coals. Why? But he doesn’t mention the Rothschilds, the nexus, who control the Bank of International Settlements.

Max promotes a gold standard, to turn back the tide to some kind of “honest free and fair, entrepreneuring Capitalism“, because he “loves his USA and its Constitution.” In that respect, he’s a Rhino, as he should realise, in all his expertise, that that is not the way the World is going at all!

The World –inevitably– is gonna go Socialist, a global Socialist super-state with a One World Currency, whatever that is going to be based on. The Euro? Special Drawing Rights? Or gold, silver and commodities? We shall see.

That’s why some people say that silver and gold will keep on rising, until it eventually gets to the point where it can’t rise any further, when the World’s bankrupt economy will have reached its true value equilibrium. Then, some pundits expect not a bursting of this “bubble”, but the rise of “some new paradigm!“–Whatever that will be? A new kind of digital economy? That is what the Bible predicts in the Book of Revelation, called the “Mark of the Beast”, a mark in the right hand or forehead, to buy and sell!” Voila!

I hope Max is for real! I hope he really is concerned about America, as Jim Rogers seems to be (he left!), blaming the real culprits for holding the world ransom, threatening the US with a crash of the system if they don’t agree to the bail out! Or is Max allowed and hired to speak truth to power, to do this “damage” for some sinister purpose?

Another baffling fact about Keiser (and Stacy!) is their very vocal support for largely discredited “Man-made Global Warming”, that is right up the Globalist alley! But by the majority of the alternative press, (even some mainstream media) AGW is correctly perceived as just another Globalist plot to organise a New World Order via “Carbon Credits!” AGW is also rejected by most honest, non-corrupted, non funded scientists who have no “Gaia water-melon” green/red international-socialist agenda. (See Wattsupwiththat.com).

But here is one of Max’s latest headlines:

Welcome to Mars you AGW denying freaks

Max also supports “peak oil” –of all things– which is another antiquated point of view in alternative circles. But perhaps he is only good at economics, while being pretty lousy in Climate Science and Geology. It’s possible! Perhaps he really is a sincere, honest, but still a deceived man, who tries to rock the boat in hopes of changing … the world? (Just as I wrote this now, I immediately somehow doubted this view of him.)

Max is a great actor! He was even playfully “nominated” as Greek president, or finance minister of Greece! He is quite popular with the undecided activists in Greece, (Not the Commies!) who seem to like him and his exposure of the facts that the bankers foisted all those Greek debts on the corrupt Greek politicians, who let the innocent Greek people foot the bill for the bail-out of the Greek government, which was tricked into that by Goldman Sachs and their ilk.

The Greeks, emboldened partly by Max and Stacy the brave “American Economic Crusaders“, are now rioting for their survival and protesting their corrupt political Judases, trying to stop Papandreou from selling off their country and its assets. That’s what is going on right now. Max & Stacy weren’t really able to stop that process. And unless the Greek Military would–by a miracle of miracles–decide to pull off a coup in favor of the Greek people, which is highly unlikely seeing their Colonels’ history, Greece will be an enslaved nation for sure. Greece is definitely not Iceland.

So what is this odd couple actually accomplishing with all that publicity, freely given to them? Russia Today, European news outlets, Iranian Press TV, even some American TV programs! If it wasn’t for all that publicity the system gives them, he would never have gotten so instantly famous.

I don’t have the full answer, from the horses’ mouth, obviously, but I am sure that lots of people have similar questions about dear Max & Stacy, this largely gullible couple. Who are they really, and what are they really up to. I just put it out here for discussion, to see what other people come up with.

But come to think of it all, the more informed among us know, that the real One World Government– Not this American based NWO, which is bound to die, “the Beast wounded by a sword” (war) — is foretold by the prophets to rise from Russia! We also know that it is going to be a red, socialist kind of international governing “Beast“. And Socialism “happens” to be also the mainstay power behind all these riots and revolutions that are spreading all over the globe.

And so as all loose ends are beginning to come together now– as they were undoubtedly planned that way!– we see them slowly coming together; The International Economic Crash, World War 3, spreading Famine, and Nuclear crises all over the place (Stuxnet?), and climate disasters (HAARP?), and… “spontaneous” global people’s color revolutions. And this is where I think maybe Max comes into the picture. I hope I’m wrong.

Is he some kind of funny, pseudo-activist? HE may be a kind of economic provocateur and catalyst, aimed mainly at the European Socialist-leaning young people and intellectuals, which are being provoked right now to grow these European and worldwide “Summers”, as well as Latin Summers, and possibly also the coming Chinese, and Thai summers, as we see from Tony Cartalucci‘s well sourced articles.

Is he perhaps just a hired clown to stir up these multi-colored peoples’ revolutions that are to demonise and ditch the American-based Corporate Fascist NWO “bad cop”, and by default–as there is no other alternative–fall to the Russian Super-state “good cop”, with this newly cool Russia Today Media station, which suddenly began “telling the truth?”

It all reminds me a bit of Radio Luxembourg during the fake Hippie Revolution Days during the Sixties, which was the European beacon of change in those days, all the while staged and produced by the Tavistock Institute, if you didn’t know it. That “cultural revolution” of the sixties was as fake as a three dollar bill, but it sure changed the cultural landscape!

I hope I’m wrong, but please do share your thoughts in the comments, but this seems to be the way my mind is leaning right now. He may be a likable, friendly provocateur, but none the less, a provocateur for the Powers-That-Be!

(Max you shouldn’t have deleted my anti AGW comments on the Keiser Report. It started to give you away a bit! But I’m impressed, you really play the part well. I don’t know if Stacy is in the know. She seems to love you and your antics anyway. Ha!)

But, come to think of it, if this is true, why would you want to be a provocateur for those evil banksters and their eventual Socialist Russian Global Superstate, anyway? I guess you must believe in it. Well then, tough luck, because, that too, is doomed to defeat, according to Ezekiel 38 and 39! But that is not politically correct of course. :)

Matt Barber #fundie barbwire.com

The Magical Land of Progressitopia

There once was a land, a magical land, with a chicken in every pot. And in this land, which was called Progressitopia, there were two peoples. There were those who saw the world as it was, and there were those who saw the world as they oh-so-very-much wished it could be. The former were called the Trads, and the latter, the Progs. It was the Progs who held dominion over this great land, and so it was they who wrote, or re-wrote, her history.

Now, in this kingdom we must remember that Christianity, or “Christianism” as it would later be called (long since forbidden), along with similar such mythological and dogmatic phantasms, remained the foremost, if not the sole, thorn in the Progs’ collectivist butt. Any and all thought or practice that might, in any way, undermine full realization of, and strict adherence to, progressive thinking was, therefore, strictly verboten.

In fact, the Trads, the traditionalist remnant, had proven singularly responsible for the famines, Civil War II and Progressitopia’s endlessly spiraling state of affairs, both foreign and domestic – a state that, notwithstanding all predictions to the contrary, somehow became significantly and enigmatically worse subsequent to the onset of progressive governance.

There was, however, one exception to this rule: Islam. Shadowing the glorious dawn of progressive reign came, from o’er the sea, a mighty and fearsome caliphate. The Muslim faith spread like wildfire. Recruitment efforts were buoyed, and appreciably so, in that, while yet a loving and peaceful religion, any skeptic or “infidel” who failed to convert was either immediately raped and enslaved or summarily beheaded, stoned, shot or blown limb-from-limb.

Whereas Progressitopians, with their one-child-only abortion mandate, stopped reproducing altogether, adherents to the religion of peace rutted like rabbits. Every corner of the globe became thickly populated by devotees of the most praised Prophet Muhammad – peace be upon him.

As global violence and jihad spiked, it seemed for a time that Progressitopia and the Islamic caliphate would be one another’s undoing.

And then something extraordinary happened.

The King of Progressitopia, a brave and handsome man most wise, with visor of gold and scepter of 3-iron in hand, bowed before the great caliph and presented a series of official mea culpas on behalf of his land. He prayed Allah’s forgiveness for incurring his wrath – just desserts for centuries of Progressitopian Imperialism.

And so these two seemingly incompatible kingdoms, with wholly polarized worldviews, agreed to forge an incongruous socio-political partnership – an “Islamo-Progressive Alliance.” The alliance was built upon the maxim: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” The common enemy, of course, had formed its own unholy alliance: the “Zio-Christian Axis of Evil.”

And so it soon came to pass that independent Islamic settlements cropped-up throughout Progressitopia. The Michganistan Territory became, for all intents and purposes, Mecca to the Western Hemisphere.

Presently, the Islamo-Progressive Alliance found itself enjoying a comparatively peaceful seven-year truce. Apart from a weekly handful of suicide bombings, mass shootings and random beheadings, carried out chiefly against Progressitopia’s women and children, things were simply capital.

But then, trouble in paradise – economic turmoil. Toward the middle of the new millennium’s third decade, Progressitopia’s national debt ballooned to over 60 trillion. For many years, Trad economists and “debt alarmists” had warned that Progressitopia’s skyrocketing debt and deficits were unsustainable. These anti-progressive thinkers openly questioned the progressive strategy of taxing and spending one’s way to prosperity.

They felt, irrationally so, that such approach represented, as one provocative naysayer phrased it, “an epically stupid and patently impossible self-contradiction. No more can one spend his way out of debt than can he cheat his way out of adultery.”

Another fundamentalist cynic offered a less hurtful, yet no less sensationalist analogy: “When a bridge’s infrastructure becomes unsustainable,” he alleged, “it will ultimately collapse if its integrity is compromised to the degree that it can no longer support some burgeoning mass. So too it goes, apparently, as relates integrity to politicians, governments and national debt.”

Right-wing propaganda aside, Progressitopia’s economy did, nonetheless, unexpectedly collapse for reasons ultimately deemed inconclusive.

Now, as heretofore told, and as go the history books, Christianism had, from time immemorial, been the very bane of free-thinking humanity’s existence. This hateful mythology had been largely to blame, in concert with its sister-faith, Judaism, and its insufferable cousin, conservatism, an equally curious mental disorder, for all of the world’s wars, slavery, racism, sexism, disease, capitalism, global warming and, most onerously perhaps, gluten sensitivity.

Moreover, both Christianism and conservatism were ultimately determined to have been the catalyst for the systemic phobia outbreak that inexplicably began around the turn of the century. First there was homophobia, an irrational, chronic and debilitating fear of the square-hole-round-peg people, or, as this flamboyant troupe, so enamored with acronymic wordplay, preferred to be called: the “SHRP community.” Since SHRPs displayed impeccable fashion sense and a flair for the fabulous, Neanderthalic Trads were, most naturally, terrified by them.

Then came Islamophobia, the irrational fear of having one’s head lopped off, followed by transphobia, the fear of naked men in ladies’ locker rooms, polyphobia, the fear of communal rompathons, as well as an all-inclusive litany of other phobias relating to myriad sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions.

Next, there emerged the great progressiphobia pandemic of ’27. This involved an equally absurd, though no less universal, fear of progressive thought, practice or people. This, for a time, threatened to halt Progressitopia’s progressing progress altogether.

Finally, there occurred a worldwide outbreak of phobia-phobia. This was, of course, a condition delineated by the once again irrational denial that any of the aforementioned phobias had “any basis in reality whatsoever,” but, rather, were “simply ham-fisted pejoratives intended to marginalize one’s political opposition.”

But, alas, we must for now part ways. My gluten-free frittata grows cold.

obersturmfuhrerss SoyBugDestroyer #transphobia reddit.com

Not getting it guys. Its a trans person.

So long as they are just living their life and letting you live yours, what's the issue again?

Right there with you if they're pushing sexuality on 8 year olds or trying to assume orwellian control over language.

But if they're just living their own life? I don't understand the issue.

obersturmfuhrerss: You are trying to rationalize disgusting and despicable behavior that damages society. We should not normalize this type of behavior even if you think it is not harming you. Children nowadays see this shit everywhere and they think it is normal.

This person should be treated in a mental institution, not encouraged to live with delusions.

SoyBugDestroyer: We live in a society. Your actions affect other people. They affect me, my wife, our children, and everyone else.

If you want to be a subhuman freak pedophile mental case, you are free to fuck off into the woods and run around with the animals. Human civilization has laws, sexual dimorphism, moral boundaries, and social standards. Continual breaching of these pillars of society will lead to its ultimate erosion.

Plea4Peace #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Evolution is a lie. Why do people believe it?
Evolution is a lie concocted by eco freaks from PETA. If we are monkeys how come monkeys can't talk? Evolution is taught in schools by liberal communists who hate America and American values. It's also racist. Evolution is used to suggest black people and Australoids are more primitive than other races. How can it be true if it's racist? But these ignorant idiots believe whatever they're told to think. They believe that nature is important and there's global warming and animals are precious and have rights because they're told to think that by liberal teachers and the liberal media. All races are equal, all people are equal for that matter, because God made us that way. Evolutionists hate equality and people. I say if you believe in evolution, go live in antarctica with your precious polar bears, while we drill for oil through your face.

Jeff Rosenthal #fundie theguardian.com

Welcome to Powder Mountain – a utopian club for the millennial elite

When these young entrepreneurs bought a remote ski resort in Utah, they dreamed of an exclusive, socially conscious community. Is this the future, or Mt Olympus for Generation Me?

by Paul Lewis

Jeff Rosenthal is standing near the top of his snow-covered mountain wearing a fluffy jacket, fingerless gloves and ripped jeans. “It’s surreal, man!” he says, shivering as he surveys the landscape of newly laid roads and half-built homes. “That’s Ken Howery’s house, the co-founder of PayPal. Awesome house!”

He lists the other investors who are turning this remote Utah community into a crucible of “generational ideology, innovation and entrepreneurship”. Richard Branson will have a house here, and so will the world’s most powerful marketing executive, Martin Sorrell. The Hollywood producer Stacey Sher and the actor Sophia Bush will be their neighbours, as will Miguel McKelvey, a co-founder of WeWork, and the renowned technology investor and author of The 4-Hour Work Week, Tim Ferriss.

The audacious real estate project – branded Powder Mountain – is becoming a mecca for altruistically minded members of the global elite. “The goal will always remain the same,” says Elliott Bisnow, Rosenthal’s business partner: “To be a beacon of inspiration and a light in the world.”

Bisnow, Rosenthal and three friends, all entrepreneurs in their 30s, dreamed up the scheme after spending years running Summit, an exclusive gathering described by insiders as a “Davos for millennials”.

Applicants to Summit are screened and interviewed to ensure they display the correct “psychographic” (or mindset) for the events. It is pitched as an entertaining ideas festival, comparable to TED and Burning Man, featuring speakers such as Quentin Tarantino, Jane Fonda, Peter Thiel and Jeff Bezos. Guests pay $3,000-$8,000 (£2,200-£5,800) for access to three-day flagship events, hosted everywhere from beaches in Tulum, Mexico, to cruise ships in the Caribbean.

Having finessed the art of persuading rich people to pay to join these getaways, the founders convinced their friends to help them buy an entire mountain in Utah, complete with 10,000 acres of some of the best ski terrain in the US.

They bristle at the idea that they’re trying to build a high-altitude utopia for plutocrats, but then casually refer to a segment of their clientele as “the billionaire set” – and don’t hesitate to mention that their mountain happens to be located between towns named Eden and Paradise.

The beautiful surroundings and unique blend of people, Rosenthal believes, will create the “exponential opportunities of the future”. “I have this whole rap with Gertrude Stein, Katharine Graham, De’ Medici, Bauhaus. There’s this rich history of groups coming together, where the whole is more than the sum of the parts, right?” he says. “I think that’s what’s happening here.”

Such hype might seem detached from reality, but it is much in vogue among the technology sector’s new generation of millionaires and billionaires, who seem keen to distance themselves from the selfish excess of their predecessors from 1980s Wall Street. They show less interest in super-yachts or sports cars; instead they speak about spiritual enrichment, connections to nature and purpose. It is against this backdrop that countless Summit-like festivals, retreats and communities have emerged in and around California, promising to help wealthy clients find a better version of themselves.

Further Future, a gathering in the Nevada desert attended by the ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt, which has been described as “Burning Man for the 1%”, promises a culture of “mindful optimism, wonder and exploration”. Scott Kriens, the chairman of the technology multinational Juniper Networks, recently opened a retreat for self-improvement and introspection in a redwood forest near Santa Cruz, California, recognising that, despite its great advances, the internet “did not help people connect to themselves”. And Esalen, an institute perched on a cliff in Big Sur that has been a magnet for a bohemian set searching for spiritual enlightenment for half a century, is now directly courting guilt-laden tech executives. “The CEOs, inside they’re hurting,” the director, Ben Tauber (a former Google product manager), recently said of his clients. “They wonder if they’re doing the right thing for humanity. These are questions we can only answer behind closed doors.”

Summit prides itself on its progressive “content”, with talks about global warming, inequality, racial divisions and the war in Syria, but there is a celebrity draw, with talks such as “Jessica Alba on defying expectations” and “Andre Agassi on scaling change”.

During the February weekend I attend (a smaller retreat on the mountain, which costs around $2,000), there are only three talks, each lasting an hour; the remaining three days are spent skiing, snowshoeing, eating and drinking, relaxing in yoga or spa sessions, or partying in crowded hot tubs.

For all its intellectual bravado, a big appeal of Summit has always been recreational. Food is provided by Michelin-starred chefs, and top musicians are flown in for dance parties; the Summit crowd contains a dedicated contingent of Burning Man aficionados, known as “Burners”, who are adept at adding fuel to the festivities. (Rick Glassman, a comedian flown from LA for a 10-minute set, prompts howls of laughter when he says Summit had taught him that “everyone does mushrooms”.)

[snip]

The story of how Bisnow and his friends – Rosenthal, Ryan Begelman, Jeremy Schwartz and Brett Leve – came to occupy their bubble on a mountaintop in Utah has become something of a legend. It began in 2008, when Bisnow, with the boundless confidence of a 23-year-old businessman, cold-called entrepreneurs he admired and invited them on an all-expenses-paid trip to Utah. Bisnow shouldered the cost of the 19-strong gathering on his credit card, then repeated the trick with another get-together in Mexico, racking up $75,000 in debt. Bisnow and the others quickly coalesced a sort of “mutual aid society” for young, well-connected businessmen, which in the early days included the co-founders of Twitter and Facebook and the real-estate heiress Ivanka Trump.

Soon, Bisnow and his friends were running dozens of closed-door events dedicated to creating “positive impact” – and hosting their flagship conferences on cruise voyages that sailed from Miami to the Bahamas. Those events acquired a reputation as booze cruises for white, male tech bros, so a few years ago Summit decided it was time for a rebrand. They introduced cheaper tickets for women to improve the gender ratio, and abandoned the Caribbean for a more down-to-earth location: Los Angeles. “Not Santa Barbara. Not Beverly Hills,” Rosenthal says. “But downtown LA – where you’re literally in the throes of gentrification and homelessness.”

For years the team worked remotely in Amsterdam, Tel Aviv, New York, Miami and Barcelona. They would combine work with snowboarding in Montana and surfing in Nicaragua. But by late 2011, the friends were approaching 30 and starting to travel less. They were living and working out of a mansion in Malibu and, Rosenthal recalls, hosting “amazing dinners that became pretty culturally significant in LA at that time”.

t was around this time they heard from a Utah-based venture capitalist that Powder Mountain was for sale and hatched a plan to transform their considerable social capital into real estate.

The plan was enacted months later, after a gathering they hosted in Lake Tahoe. They chartered a Boeing 737 and flew about 75 of their wealthier patrons from northern California to a tiny airport in Utah’s Ogden Valley. From there, it was just a short drive to the top of Powder Mountain. They arrived in time for sunset, lit a bonfire in the snow and laid out their vision.

Each investor who helped them buy the mountain would receive a plot of land – and, assuming the plan worked, their money back at a future date. They bought the mountain for $40m in 2013, but it is only in recent months that the wooden shells of the first 26 properties have mushroomed out of the mountainside, along with roads, bridges and ski lifts.

Much to the frustration of some locals, machines have been drilling wells deep into the mountain in search of water. One day there will be 500 homes on the mountain, and a village with coffee shops, juice bars, restaurants, a sound studio and a five-star hotel.

Rosenthal takes me on a driving tour of the mountain, to explain how they plan to create a community that is different from exclusive resorts such as Aspen, Colorado. Restrictions prevent anyone from building a home larger than 4,500 sq ft, and residents must use vetted architects to ensure that their home is “subservient to the land” and in a style that has been called “heritage modernism”.

“None of the architecture should express taste or wealth,” Rosenthal says, nodding to the spot that will become a central promenade. “That is a very walkable main street – we will have soft Italian kerbs.”

I steer the conversation to the subject of how utterly detached from the real world elites seem to have become. “Elitism, the way I would define it, is obtainable,” he replies. “All that stands between you and being elite is your own investment in yourself.”

I tell Rosenthal that I’ve met many people in America who work as hard as him and his friends – harder, in fact – but struggle to make ends meet. He acknowledges that he’s benefited from considerable advantage, but insists we now live in an era in which “the internet is the great equaliser”.

“What are you doing to create the utility for yourself? Are you introducing people so they can collaborate?” he says. Struggling Americans, he adds, might want to “host a dinner. Invite 10 strangers. See what happens.”

Kaykay #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Does anyone else dislike Neo-Pagans/Wiccans?

-They smell bad.

-They say they aren't Satanists but they worship a God that looks like Satan!

-They are suprisingly racist. Lots of Odinists are Racist and Nazis were either Catholic or Neo-Pagans.

-They are intolerant of Christians! They say Christians killed them even though Wicca was invented in the 20's. Also Neo-Pagans, Satanists and Atheists burnt down churches in Norway in the early 90's.

-They are hippies and support Communism.

-They eat unhealthy food (weeds, insects, and small animals)

-Lots of them are sexual perverts (homosexuals, pedophiles, and beastiality)

Anyone else agree?

tyrindor #fundie mmo-champion.com

Some people need to remember many 13 year olds nowadays look 18 with the way they dress and do their makeup. I agree with his sentencing to some extent... Yes, 41 and 13 is beyond sick, but hear me out. This happens a lot... young teenagers wanting sex with someone older, more experienced, or just for bragging rights. They egg them on and many men cave under the pressure. Yes, they are adults and should know between right and wrong however everyone has moments of weakness especially when it comes to sex. However, no matter how you put it they simply didn't rape them.

Why is it that someone get the same sentence for:
1) 41 year old flat out raping a 13 year old.
2) 41 year old having sex with a 13 year old that wanted too.

Your talking about 2 totally different animals here. Both should be punished, I fully agree, but no where near the same. The first should be 10+ years in a maximum security prison, the second should be more around 1-2 years in a minimum security correctional facility... and if/when they do it again charge them with some jail time.

As for girls that are 16-17 and totally lie to older men about their age, I feel the guy should get off with a warning at most. They aren't kids, they knew what they were doing. 16-17 is old enough to be charged as an adult so why is it considered a kid when it comes to sex? The law shouldn't be gray like this, either 16-17 is an adult or it isn't.

She's a minor. She can't consent. Its statutory rape.
]
How can a minor not consent to something? Do you really think people under 18 have the brains of a new born baby? Even a pet can consent to something. 16-17 year olds are charged as adults for murder, even 15 in some rare cases, yet if you have mutual sex with one you go to jail for statutory rape because "they couldn't consent".

The law is totally wrong here. It contradicts itself. Not to mention legal age is much lower in some other countries, and no one seems to have problems with it there. It was also much lower in America hundreds of years ago. It wasn't uncommon for a 13-14 year old to have kid(s), and raise them. It still isn't uncommon in some countries. Yet.. some people believe nowadays a 13 year old can't even consent to something?


May I remind people that some developed nations such as Japan has the age of consent of 13?

Yeah, and it's still freaking creepy. Unless you are saying you want the age of consent changed in UK, which I think I read you don't, is really a moot point.

The age of consent is pretty high in America. When I was 15 I started dating a 12 year old, and no it wasn't a sexual relationship at that age. It was my first girlfriend ever and we were friends for 2 years before that. Shortly after I turned 16, making our age gap 4 years, but then she'd turn 13 about a month later. No one had any problems with it, not even her parents because they knew I was a good guy.

Then 2 years went by and we were still seeing each other. The day I turned 18 she was 14, turning 15 in a month. A few days after my 18th birthday her parents all a sudden did not approve of the relationship because it was now illegal according to law. We broke up, I haven't seen her in 8 years.. and it still depresses me to this day.

Why does a once legal relationship become illegal simply because we BOTH got older? Not only was she my GF, but she was my best friend. I cared greatly for her, but according to society the relationship was all a sudden wrong over night. After my experience I will never support the current age of consent laws.

Pastor Matt #fundie pastormattblog.com

Hitler’s favorite philosopher was atheist Friedrich Nietzsche. In fact, he gave copies of his books to Stalin and Mussolini. Following Nietzsche, Hitler had these words placed over one of the gas ovens in Auschwitz, “I want to raise a generation of young people devoid of conscience, imperious, relentless and cruel.”

Hitler often quoted materialist philosophers with glee. One of his favorite sayings was that the destruction of the weak is a good thing for the survival of the strong for “nature intended it that way.”

Moreover, in Hitler’s Table Talk, a collection of his private sayings preserved by his closest followers, the “fuhrer”, derides Christianity as a “scourge” and wishes Germany will be the first nation in centuries to be immune from its influence. Hitler went so far as to ban Christmas and demand the Hitler Youth praise him on December 25th rather than Jesus.

Hitler also mocked Christianity for its opposition to Darwinism. Indeed, many of his closest colleagues, Goebbles, Himmler, Heydrich and Bormann, were outspoken atheists and materialists also some were intrigued by the occult.

That Hitler was a Christian is one of the most pernicious lies perpetrated by modern secularists. The second, one promoted by revisionist historians, is that Hitler and the Nazis were “right wingers.” In fact, Hitler and his party were left-wing socialists. The Nazis were “National Aryan Socialists.” The only difference between them and communists were that the former was nationalistic while the latter was global in scope. In fact, the body count racked up by the secular left during the twentieth century alone is staggering and unparalleled in history. What also goes unreported is that many progressives of the time, like George Bernard Shaw, were enamored with the Nazi party.

The myth that Hitler was a “right-wing Christian” began in the 1950s when leftist academics who had previously supported the Nazi regime began revising history to cover their butts. They successfully linked the attempts by fundamentalist groups to ban certain books from public libraries (like Henry Miller’s pornographic The Tropic of Cancer) to the burning of books by the Hitler Youth. But this is really the ONLY thing Nazis had in common with far right-wingers (and historians failed to mention that the Soviets and Chinese had also banned these books). For example, the Nazis were pro-abortion and pro-euthenasia, a position they took from Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, who Hitler greatly admired. They also supported gun control and national health insurance.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

“NEW WORLD ORDER” is the GLOBAL TOTALITARIANISM dream that a BANKER called Mayer Amschel Rothschild, helped revive in 1760's to protect his private bank from global government regulation. His grand blue print is best described by his paid social engineer called Dr. Adam [Spartacus] Weishaupt, Professor of Canon Law in the university of Ingolstadt. Weishaupt adopted the term “Illuminati.” This nightmare is still sought after today by their family's decedents.

Below is the 'outline' Weishaupt set out for his banker financier master! Carefully notice the similarities between Karl Marx's 10 Plank's of his Communist Manifesto and Weishaupt's outline. Truth is surely stranger than fiction. In order for the New World Order to succeed, first the Old World Order must be destroyed. To understand the New World Order, you need to study Bible prophecy from the book of Daniel and Revelation.

• Abolition of all ordered governments
• Abolition of private property
• Abolition of inheritance
• Abolition of patriotism
• Abolition of the family
• Abolition of religion
• A global population of 500 million
• Creation of a world government

George Washington: 1798 Acknowledged that Illuminati activity had come to the USA: “It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more satisfied of this fact than I am.”

Art Kohl #fundie fbbc.com

Over the last few decades, the semantics of this issue have changed. It has gone from Sodomy to homosexuality to gay or lesbian to sexual orientation. Today’s reference to it as sexual orientation has certainly taken the sting out of the sin.

The focus of the debate has turned from a behavior to an issue, like abortion where the debate has turned from the procedures of abortion to an issue.

If one would focus on the behavior that homosexuals admit to, they would agree with the Scriptures which says they are “abusers of themselves with mankind.” Should any government official condone abuse even between consenting adults?

“Stay out of our bedrooms, stay out of our private lives,” is a defensive posture we hear from pro-homosexuals. There are many different laws that affect each of our private lives. Laws against adultery, fornication, pedophilia, beastiality, incest, torture, rape, even seat belt laws. Most laws in some way legislate morality. Do not kill, do not steal, etc.

Homosexuality is fatal. The average homosexual, whether male or female lives about 45 years. This is 30 years less than the average heterosexual male or female. This is alarming! Only 3% of homosexuals reach their 65th birthday. Each statesman should work to warn the populace of this danger. Some in government have gone to great lengths to discourage cigarette smoking. They have sued the cigarette companies. They have had enough of the deaths that this behavior causes and the dollars spent on treating tobacco related maladies, yet cigarettes takes an average of 6 years off of an adult’s life. Homosexuality takes 30 years off. We should stand against homosexuality even if only for health reasons.

Justification for homosexual behavior is often given from the “look at the great contributions they make to our society” angle. Do our contributions justify our life style? Would this exonerate a child abuser, pedophile, prostitute, incest, beastiality or any crime or criminal? Of course not! There are certain laws I must obey in private and in public that legislate morality that are good safeguards for myself, my wife and family. I can not beat my wife and children with a baseball bat in the privacy of my home. It would endanger them and rightfully so I would be arrested. As we have seen, homosexuality endangers those who are involved with it in private.

It is best for society to believe the Scriptures in its opposition to this abominable lifestyle.

shinbits #fundie christianforums.com

Consequences of Evolution

1) Belief that that God doesn't exist, and that there are not consequences for one's actions as long as they are not caught by men.

2) Deletion of conscience because of the belief that there is no moral absolute. Those with the power to do so will do whatever ever they want, whether it's rape, pilage or murder without moral conviction, because there is no moral authority.

3) Hitler was an evolutionist.


I can really go on forever, but I'll leave some of the fun to the you. What other consequences will belief that all things are one rediculously freak series of coincidences lead to?

awe300 and InsanelyMerryJester #fundie reddit.com

[Comments under "Map of World War Shows 4,500 Years of Global Conflict" featuring a greater concentration of conflicts in Europe]

@awe300

And this is why Europe shouldn't be afraid of the thing isis calls terror - the whole continent is born from millenia of suffering. What's a few shitty desert pigs?

One word, fascism. Nobody wants to have this system in Europe, but it would be most effective on removing ISIS.

holocaust21 #sexist holocaust21.wordpress.com

Morality is just an subjective concept, a social construct created by parochial minded religious people that are trying to make you submit to their antiquated group think. They often craft shaming language toward you, accusing you of having a “high hope for a low heaven.” Evil and morality are points of view. Picture a cat playing with a mouse. To the cat, he is just playing with his food. To the mouse, the cat is the equivalent of evil it’s self. This on the other hand, this is not evil; this is evolution adapting people to be attracted to youth as an adaptive strategy. It’s the way we have evolved and is why there are so many supposed “pedophiles” everyone is freaking out about.

This is the realist’s perspective who lives by natural law and understands evolution – Life is a question, asked of the Universe, “Is this right?”…and answered by death if it isn’t. We literally evolved, through evolution, to be attracted to youth and neoteny to survive! If the trait of being attracted to youth was not beneficial, it would not have been passed on!

So, every one, stop being uptight prudes, know that everyone is different, and just because you don’t like something doesn’t mean that it isn’t or wasn’t at some point a good thing. Older people taking in younger people, as companions, was natures answer to a social safety net; there was no welfare for them when their parents died at an early age. Can you imagine using the strategy that women do today, of waiting ’till age 30 to have kids, back when there was no medical system of any kind, with your teeth rotting out of your heads! You people are silly for not seeing the obvious truths of our own biological evolution.

Again, our biology hasn’t changed, only the laws, and peoples brainwashed, reactive monkey, herd-like perspectives. Think for yourselves people! We are throwing people in jail for stupid non-violent crimes longer then people who attempt, or succeed, in murder because some stupid politicians were grandstanding for tougher laws that we didn’t need. It doesn’t even begin to make sense unless you consider it is being used to manipulate politicians through deep-state intimidation. Seems to me some arm twisting like that would explain a lot about the crazy decisions our politicians have made. I would say the age of consent of 12, like in Mexico, is about right for a legal cut off. Nature gave us every thing we need to consent to sex and that is the drive to have sex. I was a horny little bastard at 12, and so was everyone of that age around me. If you deny this, you are not only being disingenuous with yourself but everyone around you as well. Perhaps your memory is faulty, and doesn’t go back that far?

Do other animals wait for a certain age to have sex after they become able to sexually reproduce? No. It’s just as stupid to put limits on it for us after one has reached puberty. People had jobs at those ages 100 years ago. My father would be 92 this year if he was still alive, and he told me that when he was 14 he earned a man’s wage reading water meters. The population was younger in the past, on average, than they are now. In 1900, 18 percent of all American workers were under the age of 16. Child laborers often worked to help support their families. In colonial America, child labor was not a subject of controversy. It was an integral part of the agricultural and handcraft economy. Children not only worked on the family farm but were often hired out to other farmers. Boys customarily began their apprenticeship in a trade between ages ten and fourteen. Years ago each child you had made you richer, you could tend another acre of crops. Now, each child you have makes you poorer or if you are too poor to support them, burdens on the system.

The economy has changed but our biology hasn’t. We are keeping young people in school, which is essentially just giving them busy work to keep them out of the real economy, and treating them like kids longer and longer because the economy can’t support work for them, as it has all been outsourced due to globalism. The system is all screwed up, and people are too concerned about being called names rather than speak out about the real problems in western society.

I see a globalist system, which has shipped all our jobs over seas, and implemented silly laws restricting sex WELL beyond the ages of puberty. It looks more like a means of genocide to me. Those people in the middle east aren’t exactly having a shrinking population like Europeans in the west are. Yes, the young people are still having sex because they have a high sex drive, as nature intended. Nothing is going to stop that but instead of society pushing them into safe, monogamous, long-term relationships, they are making it to dangerous for that. Yes, these elites know what they are doing to us, and have been doing for a long time now. I think it’s genocide.

Grandparents were a rare breed until 30,000 years ago… when life expectancy grewhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2016759/Life-expectancy-Grandparents-rare-breed-30-000-years-ago.html

90 percent of a womens eggs are gone by age 30http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/women-fertility-falls-lose-90-percent-eggs-30/story?id=9693015

Rabbi Noson Leiter #fundie rocklandtimes.com

To the Editor,

In the midst of the raving child-molestation epidemic, it is revealing to behold certain financial interests seeking to undermine the security of children within one of America’s bulwark youth institutions, The Boy Scouts. Of course, from a Jewish perspective, the Torah position here is unequivocal: The commission of homosexual acts is a grave sin, prohibited to all Mankind. Moreover, society is obligated to ensure compliance with the Will of our Creator on such fundamental matters.

However, even those who don’t share that worldview must acknowledge some incontrovertible facts pertaining to child-protection – from a perspective of concern for victims of child-molestation. Youth organizations need to shield their children from illicit conduct of both heterosexual and homosexual types. Heterosexual misconduct and abuse is impeded by gender- separation. Homosexual misconduct and abuse is impeded by the current policy of restricting involvement to heterosexual males. Decimating that latter protective barrier will expose children to the most destructive experiences they may ever face.

Even if we are to assume that most homosexuals allowed in to the Scouts will not engage in molestation, SOME clearly WILL (as would be the case with some heterosexuals if gender-separations would be eliminated). Thus, allowing homosexuals into the Boy Scouts WILL expose children to grave danger. Exposing innocent boys to the threat of homosexual misconduct and abuse is not being liberal – it’s being barbaric.

Rabbi Noson Leiter
Founder of Help Rescue Our Children and president of Torah Jews for Decency
Monsey

ArcticFox #fundie christianforums.com

In ancient times homosexuality was prevelant in such a way that the writers of the Scriptures felt the need to address the issue specifically. What did they have to say? Although it is not extensive, it is very clear from what exists that homosexual practices are considered a form of sexual deviancy. Romans chapter 1 does the best job of stating this, for homosexual practices are likened to exchanging the glory of God for worthless idols. Somehow, in the mind of Paul (and I believe the inspired writings of Paul), homosexual practices are a form of idolatry and the sacrificing of God's glory for a 'dark' purposes.

There are other verses addressing this issue. I am not sure if they were mentioned, but I would assume so. To the original poster: if you desire, please ask and you will be provided with the necessary Scriptural passages. I don't believe, however, that is your main concern.

I do believe that your main concern is about how to love your neighbor. First, I implore you to consider what standard you consider absolute. Do you believe that standards can 'drift' over time, shifting to fit the needs of an ever-changing society? Or do you believe that there is one standard by which every society in every generation must answer to? We see laws come and go with governments, should we expect the same for religious customs and beliefs?

My firm belief is that the Bible stands as a testament to what God has to say to the world, and that through this medium he speaks words of power that are fully capable of bringing about all that he plans. I believe that this word of the living God teaches us to abhor certain practices labeled as 'evil;' homosexual acts are one such practice. They are lumped together with lying, stealing, murdering, adultery, haughtiness, boastfulness, gossip, etc. (Romans 1:28-32)

So how do we love people who claim that they are 'homosexual?' Do we consider someone who murders a 'murderer' in the sense that a murderer is who he is? Or do we treat a murderer as someone who commits an action that can be repented of and forgiven, allowing progress to be made? Do we consider a pedophile as having a character trait, or a character flaw that needs correction?

The idea of someone 'being homosexual' is a language issue in English that can prevent good discourse from happening. We label individuals as if that is part of their identity, and no doubt many claim that it IS indeed part of their identity. I do not believe so. I do not believe that homosexuality is any more a part of their identity than adultery is part of someone's identity. I do not consider someone a lifetime 'adulterer' with such as their identity; I consider an action or a lifestyle choice (if they continue in it).

I consider someone a 'Christian' in their identity because I believe they are brought into a new identity in Christ (according to Scripture). I believe this then becomes part of who they are, and it is central to their being.

I believe homosexuality is different. Our desires are a combination of natural, built-in desires and those that are programmed into us by our greater culture (society as a whole, i.e. Japan, China, Kenya, etc.), our immediate culture (family/friends/etc), and by ourselves (our own choices, resolves, etc). Having grown up in the states (US), I took to playing chess. I love the game. Now that I live in Japan, I hardly ever play; why is that? It's because one culture instilled in me a desire for something that is common and popular, while the other culture began removing that desire by lack of presence.

After all, how many of you crave sanshoku dango? Or how many of you crave Melon Pan? This are two of my favorite snack foods in Japan, and the craving for these things was non-existant before I came here and began eating them. You cannot crave what you have no experience with. That is not saying that you are unable to crave something because you didn't try it; I'm saying you're unable to crave something that you are unaware of.

How far can someone claim that their homosexual desires are inherent? If they are, is that justification for the practice? After all, some people are inherently more aggressive, but we never use this argument as justification for unwarranted violence. should we not expect the result of sin corrupting the world to end with unholy desires in us? How far can a pedophile or practicer of beastiality claim inherent desire? Where does a culture draw the line and label one 'deviant sexual practice' and label the other 'accepted, inherent sexual desire.'

Do you consider a person 'homosexual' if they have never had relations with an individual of their own gender? If so, that put it on the same level as heterosexuality (something we DO all generally consider inherent and a part of our identity). What about people who consider themselves heterosexual, have never practied homosexuality, yet have occasionally had such thoughts or desires? What label do they carry?

Let me end with a short story that should illustrate the point. It should show how our labels may actually be limiting people who otherwise should not be limited:

I once knew someone who grew up quite normally. Catch is, this individual had problems with the law and discipline. Trouble was constantly around the corner. Eventually, after a normal sexual identity of hetereosexual relationships, this individual delved for a brief time into a homosexual relationship. After ending the relationship, this individual never returned to such practices again, and in fact abhorred them. This individual never went through 'therapy' for such, nor was he pressured for nobody knew about it.

What label does this individual carry, who no longer has any such desires nor feels any identity with homosexuality? Did he make a switch from heterosexual identity to homosexual identity and then back again? Did he only briefly 'experiment' but was neverly truly 'homosexual?' Is he 'bisexual' but represses one sexual identity?

Consider that love for your neighbor will lead you upstream at times. Love, after all, accepts you for who you are, but will never leave you that way. Who loves who leaves a person in all their previous states of sin and sorrow? Who does not seek to build up their friends? If you seek to build up, then you must seek to change, indirectly or directly. If you do not seek to build up, then perhaps you are not such a good friend; this applies to all of us, including me.

Kings Wiki #sexist en.kingswiki.com

There's no such thing as "provider game" in the West. While in traditional cultures this might work like a charm, in the west girls will demand for you to self improve even if you are paying them. For instance, even if you find a girl from Seeking Arrangment she'll still ask for you to have perfect teeth or a very clean before she makes out. Or she'll asks for you to give her a massage with your strong hands and if you are a beta with fragile hands this will be a turn off.

The most important thing to understand is the western girls are looking for a lover who happens to be rich not the other way around. The best strategy is to master game and then make wealth if you want for your own sake. I would NOT recommend making money and then seeing what happens since unless you are throwing $500 dollars at her she'll give you very little. Game is the only way to stand out in such a competitive sexual market place for men.

The death of provider game shows just how destructive western culture can be. Provider game is attacked by both feminism but also because of App culture (Tinder/Instagram/Facebook/bumble) where the hordes of american men throw themselves at average looking women. This girls, therefore, demand game as a prerequisite to even consider you.

David J. Stewart #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

It is a horrible sin for a woman to reveal her nakedness in public by wearing a bikini. Many women dress in bikinis and then are paranoid that a lustful man may lust upon them. Some men get jealous and angry when other men look upon their wives, and rightfully so; but if those women would stop sinning and put some clothes on their nakedness, there would be nothing to lust upon. Lust requires an immodestly dressed woman to complete. A lustful man ought to have to guess and image what a woman's body looks like, but if you take your clothes off, then he doesn't have to imagine anything, because your nakedness is seen by him.

You are just as guilty of adultery as he is because you encouraged the sin of lust by your whorish attire (Matthew 5:28). Prostitutes wear more clothing than girls and women at the beach do in skimpy bikinis. Mamas are so stupid when they let their little girls run around in their underwear. Then those mothers freak out when a pedophile kidnaps and molests their child. What do you expect? You never know what is going on in a person's mind.

Psyops #fundie forums.somd.com


We get that think this was a serious crime. We get that you would had your child (if you had one; which it's obvious you don't) you'd have your own child thrown in prison and put your own son on (in your own words) "a sex offenders list". We get that you would have your own 14 year old son "prosecuted and ostracized".

See, most of us who are REALLY parents have a more rational way dealing with family problems; and that is to discipline, counsel, punish, and (when necessary, get our children help. You're the type that feels you have some right to inject yourself into the business of other peoples' families. You think you have some sort of ownership over peoples' lives. Most of us just want to get through our family issues, and YES, cover up our dirty laundry because, quite frankly.............. IT'S NONE OF YOUR DAMN BUSINESS. The Duggars dealt with it in their own way. How they dealt with it worked for them. The kids went on with NORMAL lives with their own families and don't need people like you coming along and trying to dictate to them how they should deal with their own problems.

You try to portray yourself as some conservative libertarian, when it's blatantly clear that you're nothing but a progressive,government-involved-in-everything, activist, busybody.


Everyone huh? By my count most have no opinion or are staying out of it and there are 4 or 5 on each side. But you can count that as 'everyone' if you want

You have made your point clear too. You would hide your son's criminal activity even when he repeats it numerous times and violates 5 different grls and you would teach him to not take personal responsibility for his actions.


Yes, I would hide my 14 year old son's 'criminal' activity because it's none of your damn business. You're a damn busybody thinking you're entitled to know what a family's 14 year old kid is doing. What happens in my house is my own business and how I deal with it is none of your business. What you fail to realize is how the Duggars dealt with Josh worked for them. They got Josh the help he needed and it worked. You'd have your kid in prison and deemed a pedophile for life. That just freaks me out that you'd be that kind of parent. I hope the hell you never have kids, because you're in for a rude awakening. But even this is a waste of time because you think you have it all figured out.

Now you go on and have the last word (because I know you just can't stand to have someone else have the last word), because I'm done with your ignorance and nonsense.

Steve #conspiracy answers.yahoo.com

When they are spraying it is so obvious, just look for the trail.
When they are not you have to listen for them and then search the sky they are hard to find.
All on the same day, same weather, same everything.
The disinfo trolls say it's normal, wheres yer med, get yer tin foil hat on.
But when you point out 10 military jets are spraying while 20 are not they wont speak, dissapear, delete the message.
Obvious disinfo creeps are killing themselves for what? To support population control, they are complete idiots.
Makes no sense at all.

How blind can you be Mildred? I listed weather professionals and government sites that flat out prove Chemtrails. Pure denial never wins, and personal attacks only prove you are disinfo, is that how you win arguements by calling people names? Wow, what a sophisticated intellectual.

Robert Oscar Lopez #homophobia #transphobia #fundie #wingnut midlandszone.co.uk

<Blog source seens lost or deleted so using third-party article.>
Robert Oscar Lopez says: “Because we have not had enough of the LGBT issues forced down our throats, all thirty days of June now serve as a 24-hour Orwellian bullhorn blaring gay slogans at us. Whether you are shopping for shoes, celery, or a new 401-K, every business you patronize must remind you for thirty days straight that they are enthusiastic supporters of sodomy, lesbianism, cross-dressing, and pansexuality.

“So I thought I would contribute to the ever-growing cascade of rainbow-themed content, with another listicle about ten things you should know to get through Pride Month. Here goes...”

Among the tips Lopez then goes on to explain are ‘Call your cable company and discontinue your cable service’, about which he then writes: “There are many things you can do to spend your spare time, which do not involve watching Hollywood and Manhattan liberals lie to you about the wonderful benefits that legally sanctioned sodomy brings to great nations. Make plans to do other hobbies to fill your spare time.”

Other tips include ‘Don't take calls from your pro-gay or gay relatives’, ‘Take time during June to speak positively about moral courage’ and ‘Revel in your heterosexuality during June’.

For the latter, Lopez suggests: “If you are married, make love to your spouse as much as you can. Talk to your children about how you met and fell in love. Show affection to your spouse publicly by holding hands and caressing, and giving a tactful kiss on the cheek”.

He further suggests: “Go on a date somewhere upbeat but romantic, tucked away from urban centers full of Gay Pride hysterics. LGBTs have commandeered thirty days on a calendar, but your heterosexuality is eternal and blessed - enjoy that and show it to the world.”

Therumancer #fundie escapistmagazine.com

It's political. To be fairly honest very few people care about lesbians in general. Guys are either turned on by it, or don't care as it has nothing to do with them. Women can use it as an insult, but in general don't care that much about it either if they aren't involved.

While I won't say it's never happened, I can't think of many examples outside of fantasy (oftentimes directed at men) where lesbians have attacked and raped children especially in the pre-sexual age groups.

Yet when it comes to gay men, the same cannot be said. When you hear about gay sexual assault it's inevitably involving men, and despite Lesbianism having been prevelent you'll notice that back in say ancient Greece you didn't have young girls being run down and captured as homosexual sex slaves the same way you had it going on with boys. This is incidently where the term "Greeking" comes from (though it doesn't nessicarly have a pedophille connotation).

In general it's the gay men that get the serious opposition when it comes to gay rights. Despite what the media might imply it's not all religious fantatics and such, nor misguided "homophobes" who dislike them for no reason other than being differant (actually most involved have reasons and frequently they have little to do with religion).

Given that the purpose of such articles is specifically to garner attention, and whether anyone wants to admit it or not, the majority of anti-gay sentiment is men against gay men, you need to focus on gay men to really make a serious issue on gay rights.


[ Is that because they are gay, or because they are men? I mean, when you hear about human sexual assault it's inevitably involving men. Occam's Razor and all, the simpler explanation seems to be about sex/gender and not sexual orientationOnly to you Cheeze, you can argue semantics either way. The bottom line is that your pro-gay, I'm not. There really isn't any point to us argueing about it anymore over the internet.

All we're going to do is retread old territory and accomplish nothing while generating hundreds of responses. ]


Only to you Cheeze, you can argue semantics either way. The bottom line is that your pro-gay, I'm not. There really isn't any point to us argueing about it anymore over the internet.

All we're going to do is retread old territory and accomplish nothing while generating hundreds of responses.


[ If you're going to post the same "gay men are rapists" thing every time homosexuality comes up, the least he can do is post the exact same response every time. Y'know, for balance. ]


His general "well maybe it's a problem with men and not with male homosexuals" is inherantly rididculous for a number of reasons. Foremost of course being the way in which he makes an absurd arguement given that we need heterosexual sex and reproduction to continue the species. So when all is said and done that pretty much trumps anything. Homosexuals by their nature do not reproduce so can be targeted to reduce a problem without hurting our species at all. Anything you target reducing the overall problem.

Plus a lot of it revolves around pre-sexual humans as I've made clear. While there are exceptions to every rule, in general when dealing with a hetero rapist or "child molestor" your dealing with someone going after teens and generally physically capable children. Someone like a Roman Polanski (going after 13 year old jailbait) being the quintessential example, along with various cases of teachers and high school students, etc... In comparison in cases when your hear about like 6-8 year old kids being sexually assaulted the perpetrator is a gay man.

Even when looking at porn, when it comes to heterosexuals your mostly looking at jailbait, for the real little kids it's *almost* universally gay porn.
...
On the other hand when you have cases of someone having sex on like an 8 year old, in the majority of cases it's a male homosexual. This is not to say heterosexuals have not done it, it's just far, far less common.

Dennis Prager #fundie orthodoxytoday.org

A final reason for opposition to homosexuality is the homosexual "lifestyle." While it is possible for male homosexuals to live lives of fidelity comparable to those of heterosexual males, it is usually not the case. While the typical lesbian has had fewer than ten "lovers," the typical male homosexual in America has had over 500. In general, neither homosexuals nor heterosexuals confront the fact that it is this male homosexual lifestyle, more than the specific homosexual act, that disturbs most people. This is probably why less attention is paid to female homosexuality. When male sexuality is not controlled, the consequences are considerably more destructive than when female sexuality is not controlled. Men rape. Women do not. Men, not women, engage in fetishes. Men are more frequently consumed by their sex drive, and wander from sex partner to sex partner. Men, not women, are sexually sadistic. The indiscriminate sex that characterizes much of male homosexual life represents the antithesis of Judaism's goal of elevating human life from the animal-like to the Godlike.

MattShizzle #fundie rationalresponders.com

It's insane to say someone should be punished with a baby just for having sex. I personally don't have a problem with infanticide as long as it's the parents/mother doing it up to maybe age 2. Abstinence is utterly unacceptable to nearly any normal person. I see no problem euthanizing anyone in a situation where they are at an infants ability to reason and/or function. I certainly wish someone would have enough mercy to kill me if I was in that situation. People seem to have this unhealthy obsession with protecting babies. Guess what? The species is way overpopulated now - we don't need to worry about dying out barring a freak disaster (ie large meteor strike) or doing something stupid like nuclear or biological war.

The Rev. William H. Grimes #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Sermon 17: God and the Military
By The Rev. William H. Grimes
Joshua 1:9: “Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee whithersoever thou goest.”
Psalm 108:12-13: “Give us help from trouble: for vain is the help of man. Through God we shall do valiantly: for he it is that shall tread down our enemies.”
Since the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, our military has been going down the direction of accepting perversion, witchcraft, sodomy, and immorality. Letting sodomites serve along godly men in our military will lead to its downfall.
First of all, women really shouldn’t be in the military except possibly for purposes of first aid and some other similar feminine duties. However, since we seem so intent on letting women serve, why is the Pentagon now letting men who are mentally deluded enough to think they’re women sleep in the barracks with women? For all of his many faults, Wicked Donny actually had it right in this case. These pedophiles and molesters and mentally ill freaks shouldn’t be allowed to sleep, shower, or do anything of the sort with women who have been deluded with enough feminist propaganda to try to do a man’s job!!!!! SAY AMEN IN THE HOUSE OF GOD! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
So, women, sodomites, transvestites, and the mentally ill are all National security risks! If we don’t heed God’s commandments, our military will succumb to another, whether it be Russia, North Korea, China, or Iran! Don’t even mention the size and scope of the US military! Just remember what Gideon’s army did when faced with a much larger army! This is undeniable proof that if America doesn’t turn back from this wickedness and evil, there will be a day when we speak Russian or Mandarin or Korean!!!!!!!!!!!
SO, TURN BACK TO THE LIVING GOD AND BAN WOMEN, SODOMITES, TRANSVESTITES, PERVERTS, NON-CHRISTIANS, AND OTHER DEGENERATES FROM MILITARY SERVICE!!!! WE HAVE TO STOP THIS NOW, OR IT WILL NOT END UP WELL FOR THIS WICKED AND SINFUL APOSTATE NATION! WE MUST REJECT SATAN WHO IS THE UNHOLY WICKED FALSE GOD OF THIS AGE!!!!!!!!!! NO MORE HOMOS SLEEPING WITH GODLY MEN NOR MEN SLEEPING IN WOMEN’S BARRACKS THAT SHOULD HAVE NEVER EXISTED! Look to Romanism Debunked, which will be released soon! God’s people said AMEN!

Dr. Georgia Purdom #fundie christiannews.net

Study Announces Discovery of New Species of Crocodile, But Speciation Is Not Evolution, Says Christian Geneticist

A study published by Zootaxa recently outlined the discovery of a new species of crocodile, estimating that the creature arrived on the scene eight million years ago due to volcanic activity in Central Africa.

...(cut to avoid it being too damn long)...

However, Dr. Georgia Purdom with the Kentucky-based Answers in Genesis told Christian News Network that while she agrees that there are two distinct crocodile species as concluded by the researchers, she differs with them on the time frame in which the Mecistops leptorhynchus came to be.

“God’s word gives us the truth about the past and since God is a perfect eyewitness and does not lie (Titus 1:2), we can trust His word,” she said. “Around 6,000 years ago, God created the crocodile kind with inherent genetic diversity. About 4,500 years [ago], there was a global Flood that covered the entire world, but God saved Noah and his family and the many different kinds of animals, including the crocodile kind, on the ark. After the Flood, animals migrated to different parts of the world, including crocodiles going to Africa.”

“Many post-Flood catastrophes occurred that caused volcanic eruptions and the formation of mountains that isolated organisms from each other,” Purdom explained. “Natural selection (and other mechanisms) acting on the created genetic diversity that crocodiles already had led to differences in the populations of crocodiles in West and Central Africa, eventually splitting them into two species.”

She said that the speciation occurred within a relatively short period of time, and not over millions of years as the study would suggest.

“This speciation occurred quickly in only a few thousand years, and we see many examples of rapid speciation occurring today even within human lifetimes,” Purdom outlined. “This is only possible because the genetic diversity is already present. Evolutionary ideas predict that species take millions of years to form because the genetic diversity must be generated by random chance mutations. Instead, we observe that organisms must already have this diversity (created by God just several thousand years ago) because species can form so quickly.”

And while Newsweek recently reported that the human-culpable extinction of various mammals, birds and reptiles appears to be “outpacing evolution,” and that in the past, “[m]illions of years of evolution helped replace lost species with new ones,” Purdom contended that speciation is not evolution.

“Crocodiles are still crocodiles, and they aren’t gaining traits that will eventually result in them being a non-crocodile,” she noted. “Species form and become adapted and specialized for their environment. If that environment changes, then they may not be able to survive and [will consequently] die. Thankfully, God created animals with genetic diversity that often allows new species to form that are adapted to the new environments so that His creation is preserved even in a fallen, sin-cursed world.”

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

Trump’s CIA director, Pompeo, tells us that Julian Assange, the leader of wikileaks is “on the wrong side of history.”

That is commie language, commie thinking. To say that history has a side in earthly political struggles is history reified and personified as the Jewish God.

Probably he is a cultural Marxist rather than an old style Marxist, since old style Marxists are mighty thin on the ground these days.

Personifying “History” is characteristic of Jewish descended leftism via Marx. Puritan descended leftism via Harvard immanentizes salvation, rather the immanentizing the deity.

This ideology puts one on a course that necessarily results in the murder of very large number of people. Pompeo is ticked with Julian Assange for exposing, and thus disrupting, various color revolutions, but the biggest color revolution that is cooking right now is in America itself, which revolution, if it goes through, will likely result in the deaths of Trump and all his family, and probably most republicans in office. If you favor color revolutions, you favor antifa, you favor killing Trump, his family, and Trump supporters.

The Marxist does not think of himself as intending to murder the peasants, and the cultural Marxist does not think of himself as planning to send all hetero males to the Gulag. Rather he thinks that if it was not for “bullying” all nine year old boys would be gay and they would all be fucking in the classroom a great big pile. When a great big pile fails to ensue in the classroom, escalates the war on “bullying”, until it eventually starts to look remarkably like sending all cisgender males to the Gulag.

The original Marxists were going to emancipate the peasants from the landlords, and utopia and abundance would ensue. Utopia and abundance failed to ensue. Obviously invisible intangible landlord oppression. Therefore, war on kulaks, which liberation of the peasants looked curiously similar to war on the peasants. And thus, today, instead of war on kulaks, war on cis hetero patriarchal oppressors. They are liberating us from being “bullied”. They are indignant at our lack of gratitude. And the war on bullying inevitably escalates.

“ohh mai gosh, people like you, cishet white privileged DUDEBROS, are the reason women and POCs are oppressed, wow just wow, the white race must be abolished (don’t worry, only as a social construct, I have nothing sinister in mind *rubs hands*), so listen now, fratboyrapist microaggressor douchenozzle, we’re sending you and your associates to the gulag – k bye!”

The Czar failed to support Pyotr Stolypin, and appointed a bunch of lefties to the council of ministers, who, when the Czar was away at the front, refrained from any serious effort to restrain revolutionaries who intended to kill the Czar and his family, and who when trouble broke out, resigned in favor of the revolutionaries. Giving Pompeo power and taking power away from Bannon is a similar error. Politics is war by other means, and for the past couple of decades has been drifting closer to war by the usual means.

Russian Neo-Nazis #fundie truthwinsout.org

Russian Neo-Nazis Using Social Media To Find And Torture LGBT Teens

To add depth to the portrait of just how horrific Russia is these days for LGBT people, for journalists, for women and for political protesters, we now have a report that Neo-Nazis are using the Russian social media site VK.com to lure LGBT teens into being tortured and outed to their communities:

President Putin’s crusade against LGBT community in Russia took a new turn.

Infamous Russian ultranationalist and former skin head, Maxim Martsinkevich, known under the nickname “Cleaver” (or “Tesak” in Russian) spearheaded a country wide campaign against LGBT teens using a popular social network VK.com to lure unsuspected victims through personal ads. Mr. Martsinkevich’s numerous and enthusiastic followers started two projects: “Occupy Pedophilyaj” and “Occupy Gerontilyaj”. Allegedly they are trying to identify and report pedophiles using these “movements”. In reality, over 500 online groups have been created inside VK.com social network in order to organize illegal militant groups in every Russian city. Oddly enough their idea of fighting pedophiles targets exclusively male teenagers who respond to the same-sex personal ads and show up for a date. Captured victims are bullied and often tortured while being recorded on video. These self-proclaimed “crime fighters” perform their actions under the broad day light, often outside and clearly visible to general public that indifferently passes by or even commend them. Video recordings of bullying and tortures are freely distributed on the Internet in order to out LGBT teens to their respective schools, parents and friends. Many victims were driven to suicides, the rest are deeply traumatized.

Putin’s government, of course, has taken no action against these groups. This is the world that Vladimir Putin is creating, a nation that a close friend of mine, who has lived and studied in Russia, now refers to as a “thug petro-state.” We can also thank American extremist Evangelicals like Scott Lively for helping to plant the seeds.

lifeasamap #fundie lifeasamap.tumblr.com


in response to this

For the record, I’ve talked a lot about having zero maternal instincts and not liking children in general. They’re loud, they’re noisy, they want a ton of attention. But paedophiles aren’t manipulative, whilst you accuse people that literally say nothing more than, “Hey, paedophiles shouldn’t be allowed alone near children” of being rapists and incestual abusers?

You call me “manipulative” whilst twisting my words, you know? I have not accused you of being a rapist. I have not accused you of participating in incest.

Here’s what I said on rape (emphasis added for clarity):
“Now, maybe if you personally have a desire to rape, a desire that you actively have to fight against, then I could understand why you might project such a desire onto me as well. But if that’s not the case, and I assume it’s not, then I fail to see where you come up with that idea.“


“No, it’s not appropriate for paedophiles to be left alone with children,”

I have already, many times, said that it is inappropriate for any adult, including pedophiles, to be alone with a child unless the situation deems it to be necessary. And when it’s necessary for an adult to be alone with a child, it’s still inappropriate to choose an adult who isn’t trusted or otherwise fit for the duty, whether or not they are a pedophile.


You, personally, are a manipulative, predatory paedophile monster, and every last one of your followers and supporters deserve to rot.

Real nice. Personal attacks and dehumanization, followed by wishes of ill will to everyone who disagrees with you. That’s typically what you hear from a strong argument, right?

I genuinely look forward to when you make a mistake and you can be reported to your local authorities.

I’m a non-offending MAP. There is nothing to report me to the authorities for. What are you gonna do, tell the cops that I find kids attractive? That’s not a crime. “Non-offending” means I don’t commit crimes against children. Essentially, you just said you hope I give you an opportunity to harass me and attempt to ruin my social circles, all because of who I find attractive. Wow.

I mean, it’s either that, or you hope I’ve committed a crime that would justify your report, which is frankly disgusting.

Ellis Washington #fundie wnd.com

The world stands at the brink – the Progressive/Muslim Axis vs. Natural Law/Christianity. Indeed, developments in Egypt, Tunisia and Jordan may indeed be that fateful domino that causes civilizations to collide into global catastrophe. Muslims want to invite apocalypse to set the stage for the so-called Twelfth Imam. Since the 1880s, progressives have provoked societal chaos through a litany of diabolical ideas and welfare policies designed to plunge America and the West into utopian socialism as a pretext to destroy Christianity, Natural Law and the Constitution while forcing society into a globalist Marxist state.

Heads the Progressive-Muslim Axis wins – tails Western civilization, Christianity and Israel lose.

#homophobe #racist #sexist desuarchive.org

Scootaloo's Lesbian Moms

Thoughts, anypony?

(Anonymous)
God, I want faggots and faggot pushers dead.

(Anonymous)
>being raised by lesbians aunts turn you into a filly that almost kill herself to get some acceptation
>being raised by a normal straight family turn you into an element of harmony and future ruler of a nation

Sound like a great lesson

(Anonymous)
Lol, the first gay couple HAVE BEEN NEGLECTING THEIR FILLY FOR YEARS. God, I hate faggots. They should never be parents. A child needs a caring mother and a STONG father figure, not a fag that literally bends over for cock in his ass.

(Anonymous)
It's really funny how the kid with the progressive family is always the weird one in the group

(Anonymous)
>no dad and mom and being raised by lesbians create a bad child
>no dad and mom and being raised by a normal heterosexual family create a good child
WOW
what a fucking surprise

(Anonymous)
I want to lynch every fucking kike pushing this degenerate bullshit everywhere even in goddamn kids shows

(Anonymous)
>One is fat and the other is ugly.
>Same sex couple.
Its true. Mlp is based and redpilled when they aren't even trying to be.

(Anonymous)
>degenerate parents
>crippled kid

(Anonymous)
>That disgusting faggot openly admits to shoving sodomy into MLP.
>People still pretend he isn't a cancer on par with the toys hasbro forces into the show.
Post the picture of him in drag at a faggot bar spreading HIV, and tell me he's a good writer who's helped FIM.

(Anonymous)
the show is subtly redpilled as usual.

Gay parenting is bad.

(Anonymous)
>the ONLY lesbians in equestria are also easily two of the ugliest mares in the show
really makes you think

(Anonymous)
Scootaloo was brought up not only by lesbians, but by Australian lesbians.
Gee, no wonder she ended up being a cripple and an overall waste of episode screentime.

(Anonymous)
>deviant sexuality
>being normalized
>ever

(Anonymous)
Gays are a product of broader hypersexualization of literally everything; they have essentially built an identity around what amounts to a fetish and rallied support from broader society.

(Anonymous)
when do they force Scoots to become transexual?

aleskakolja #fundie aleskakolja.tumblr.com


I have been thinking a bit about this, and since we have some numerical data maybe we can put numbers in the issue of “pedophiles genocide”. Maybe seeing the numbers could help to have clearer visions of the implications of some people’s desires and intentions.

So, there are a large part of antis who think that all pedophiles, no matter what, should die. I want to believe that most of them don’t think that for real, that they talk without thinking first and that they aren’t actual genocidals waiting for a chance. But I would like to show the implications of following this sentiment.
The numbers: 


The global population is around 7000,000,000. The number of pedophiles is estimated to be around a 5% (and maybe it could be bigger, since the female population hasn’t been deeply studied and we are talking only about pedophiles, not ALL MAPs. But well, we’ll go with that number. An estimation).

What does this mean? That around 350,000,000 people are pedophiles. 350 MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN THE WORLD ARE PEDOPHILES.

Think slowly about it. USA population is 323 millions. The whole Europe population is 743 millions. Murdering all pedophiles would mean that you want to kill more than what the USA’s population is. Half of the european population. Can you see it now? Do you have the number and its implications in your head?

But well, we’ll keep going over this. I’m strongly against death penalty. I don’t think we have any right to decide who lives and who dies and I don’t believe in a punitive justice system. That is not justice, that is just revenge. I believe in rehabilitation and reinsertion when it is possible, in turning criminals in good, productive members of society and approach the penitenciary system not as a punishment but as therapeutic, educational system. But I’m going to let this for a moment. We are going to say that we accept death penalty for some criminals and that child abusers get that. By this genocide you aren’t just killing offenders, but millions of innocent people. Gonna imagine that a 25% of pedophiles are offenders in some way (and I’m being generous with the number. Too high). If that is true, you are still mudering 262,500,000 of innocent people. Even if half of the pedophiles where child abusers, that would be 175 millions of innocents murdered. The studies with higher numbers about the nazi holocaust talk about 15-20 millions of victims. When you say you want all pedophiles dead that means that you want a genocide 20 times worse than the nazi one. Even if you are full of hate and approve capital punishment, you should be able to see that the genocide of 350 millions of people, innocent or not, just for a specific and unchosen trait of them is too radical and useless. But I’ll go over this now.
“It is for a greater good”


Ok, just for a second, we are going to pretend that the murdering of innocent people (or just, murdering in general) is justificable in some way, we are going to imagine that there is such a thing as a greater good that is above the most basic human right of millions of people and that makes their murder ok. What would you achive with this? Well, acknowledging that only around 33% of CSA is commited by pedophiles that means that this genocide wouldn’t stop even half of the abuse children suffer. 66% of it would still happen. So we would have millions of innocents dead and children still being abused without no one taking serious actions to stop it, because they have focus all the effort in the murdering of pedophiles.

But that is not all. Pedophiles would keep borning, of course. Because pedophilia is not a choice, an ideology or something you can control. People would still born with this trait and would develop it, so you’d have to keep murdering a 5% of human population every generation. This would include a lot of CSA survivors, of course, that turn out to be pedophiles when they grow up. But since you are killing pedophiles CSA is impossible so there isn’t survivors, right? This approach will just lead to a total invisibilization of CSA, because to justify the genocidal attitude you need to support the idea that only pedophiles commit CSA, so the voices of most victims wouldn’t be hear. 

And of course, if your intention is murdering pedophiles as a “prevention” strategy, it would be the best that you kill them as young as possible, before they can commit any offense. Since most people became aware of their attractions as teens, you would be killing mostly minors. Probably the millions you are killing are all under 16. But that is ok, because it is for a greater good… Or maybe not.

Because by killing all pedophiles you would still have most of CSA happening and you would have to keep an eternal genocide for the rest of the history without any perks coming from it. Because you would see friends, family, neighbours… dying constantly for a trait they didn’t choose and you would have to accept it because that is supposed to make some kind of good for society. This is not effective. This doesn’t save children. This is heinous. There are way better things we can do about this topic.
So, what can we do, then?


We, as a society, have a principal role here. We can prevent CSA before it happens and the way to achive this is not murdering, it’s not genocide, it’s not hate. It is knowledge and understanding. We need to be aware of the risk factors for CSA and treat them as soon as we notify someone has them. Treatment is not murdering, but therapy. And this is not a thing just for pedophiles. This is something for anyone with these risk factors (lack of empathy, self-control…). On the side of pedophiles, literature is clear about it: isolation only hurts and create risk factors. The way to prevent pedophiles from offending is offering them a supportative, open society. If instead of making them feeling like mosters doomed to abuse we teach young pedophiles that they are ok, that they are in control of their actions and that people are going to still love and care about them we are protecting these teens from developing the distortions that can lead to abuse. An open society would mean that pedophiles who need it could go to therapy without fear, learning to accept themselves, to empathize with children, fighting cognitive distortions and developing self-control skills that would prevent them from commiting any kind of offense. This therapy is the way to prevent CSA. And to provide it we need that society stops to hate and demonize pedophiles so they can take this step. But therapy alone is not enough. Human beings need acceptation, need people who show love for them, need to be part of a group and community. That is why you shouldn’t isolate pedophiles. Because it hurts their mental health, because maybe the only ones who show acceptation would be pro-contact communities, because maybe their loneliness pushes them to do something terrible that we all could have prevent if we had had enough understanding and vision for it.
Conclusion


When you say you want all pedophiles to die you mean that you want 350 millions of people dead. These aren’t light words. This is a terrible statement and maybe you should think about it carefully before support it. You should keep in mind that pedophiles are human beings, with family and friends, most of them innocent, and that all this death would bring a lot of pain to the world without actually helping anyone. The dead of pedophiles wouldn’t stop CSA. Most children would still be abused. The way to prevent this is a good konwledge of the causes and risk factors of CSA and early intervention on these. Genocide, demonization or isolation is not the right intervention, it is an useless preventive strategy with a lot of negative impact. If we want to actually help children we should start by understanding what pedophilia is, who are the pedophiles and heping them to remainn non-offending and anti-contact. We should all work together with MAPs, who can be actually the first step in CSA prevention and the ones turning pro-contacts and potential abusers in riskless people, so we can help children. We should guide ourselves by science, by research, by what we learn and not by what we feel or just blindly believe.
Some last reflections for antis


Please, next time you type something like “I hope all pedos die” “I wish you all were dead” “Please, die” “kill yourself” “best you can do is killing yourself” or any form of suicide baiting and death wishing try to think in the effect of your words. Try to think that in the other side of the screen there is a human being, a person with their life, their problems, their suffering. Someone who didn’t choose to be like that and who has to learn to live with a part of themselves that they probably hate way more than you do. The person you are talking to is not your abuser, is not any child abuser. It is another scared person who is seeking a bit of help and empathy from another human beings. It could be anyone. Your best friend, your nice classmate, your parent, your children. Anyone. 

Because when you express this desire you are telling 350,000,000 of human beings that they would be better off dead. And these are strong words, directed towards people with a high suicide risk. With this, you aren’t protecting children, you are hurting them. With this, you are just spreading your rage to feel a bit better about yourself in the most twisted and egoistic way, but you cause harm. Even to yourself, no matter if you can’t see this now. Drowing in hate, rage and such a toxic ideology won’t bring you peace or happiness. You will only feel worse and worse, more full of wrath, until the day you can’t hold it anymore.

Try to be careful. Think in your words, in their true meaning, in society, in what we can do to make this world better. Stop for a moment, breath deeply, ignore the hate, the rage, your pain, and then try to open your eyes and start to learn. You don’t have to agree in everything. You dont’ have to be a MAP supporter. But just stopping to spread a message of hate and genocide and starting researches and discusssions would do a lot of good. For society, yes, but specially for yourself. Because you are the one who is getting more hurt with this. I hope you can think slowly and see this someday. And for that day I’m here. And for the day before too. I want to know you, I want to help you, I want to show you kindness and empathy. I know you are a good person, that you mean well and that someday you could see what was wrong in your actions. Until then, I’ll be here anyway. I’m open to talk, to discuss, to share my sources and research and to give you support when you need it. But please, stop to support genocide. Don’t let yourself to think that the murdering of 350,000,000 can be in any circunstances for a greater good. Never. Genocide is always wrong. 

And if you are an anti who is against cross-tagging, against suicide baiting and death wishes and who believe in therapy even if you don’t like the MAP community, please, try to be vocal about this. Help to make your community less toxic and hateful, help another people to be less dogmatic and more open to talk and discuss in respectful ways, try to make them see why wishing people dead or telling them to commit suicide is wrong. You have a lot of power in your hands and you can stop a lot of harm just by making your community a bit more open, tolerant and safe, by making it less harmful for its members and less anti-science, anti-recovery and anti-therapy. If you believe that something is wrong don’t be afraid and speak up against it. I have talked with antis who only were antis and who wrote hateful stuff because they were scared to be called out and hated for not being like the other antis. That is not good. No one should feel forced to do something they don’t agree with and that makes them distressed just for the fear that their own community causes them. Be helpful, be there for the ones who show more humanity and empathy. Suport therapy and understanding, not genocide, rage and hate. Give everyone a hand.

So, summarizing, if you support the idea of wanting all pedophiles dead, try to think slowly, be aware of the implications, keep the numbers and facts in your mind. Genocide is not an option. If you want to fight monsters, try to don’t become yourself in one.

The Portal #conspiracy #ufo #crackpot #wingnut 2012portal.blogspot.com

<multiple links removed throughout to shorten entry>

As we are now right before the dawn of the new Golden Age, a strong purification must occur before we as a planet can enter the Light. This purification is called the end time madness.

The end time madness is happening individually, with many people freaking out and showing dysfunctional behavior, but also globally.

Since they know now that their end is inevitable, the Cabal wants to destroy the surface human population in the process of their own downfall.

They attempted that in December last year by triggering the financial collapse through the repo market, and that did not work, they tried that in early January through escalation with Iran, that did not work, they tried to engineer a false flag in Virginia, that did not work, so what is left?

A global pandemic scare.

2019-nCoV is an advanced ethnic bioweapon that targets mostly Asian population:

The current epidemic is a result of covert biological warfare that goes on between China and USA.

Chinese long term military strategy against USA is based on bioweapons to a great degree:

And upgraded it into a bioweapon at the lab in Wuhan:

Then a USA agent, previously infiltrated into the Wuhan lab, and involved in the development of the virus, stole a sample of coronavirus and spread it into the Wuhan seafood and animal market. From then on the virus was spreading with geometric progression that can really look scary:

It is interesting to note here that Peter Salama, a renowned epidemiologist that worked for WHO and a board member of GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, died on January 23rd:

The Pleiadians are working tirelessly to stop the epidemic. On Friday, January 24th, they have developed the first Stardust nanopowder to erase the virus and have spread it towards the surface of the planet from their ships stationed in Low Earth Orbit. The virus has reacted to the nanodust and mutated into a slightly less lethal and slightly more transmissible form.

Learning from the reaction of the virus, the Pleiadians have developed a more advanced version of Stardust and applied it on Monday and Tuesday (January 27th and 28th).

As as result of this, the virus is not spreading anymore with geometric progression as it was until now, and appears to be slowing down:

The Light forces are expecting that the spread of infection will even out in a week or two, with less and less new cases reported after that.

After enough attempts, the Pleiadians will be able to completely hack the virus and stop it from spreading, exactly in the same way they stopped the Spanish flu pandemic in 1918:

The viruses can only spread effectively when they receive support from the dark forces on the plasma plane.

Also, all remaining Chimera plasma spiders, which are up to a few miles in diameter, are extremely starved and on the brink of extinction, and now they are rushing to Wuhan and other cities with high number of infections to feed off fear and suffering.

This is a perfect trap for them, as the Light Forces can clear them much more effectively when they all gathered in such a small space and are not evenly spread around the surface of the planet anymore.

The Light Forces are now intensively clearing all the infection-supporting plasma and all plasma Chimera spiders and with this rate of purification, all plasma Chimera beings will be gone in a week or two, with only physical Chimera in US Space Command and DARPA remaining.

The Light Forces are asking everybody that feels so guided to support this clearing process by visualizing violet flame purifying all virus-supporting plasma and all plasma Chimera spiders.

mrversatile48 #fundie christianforums.com

Open their eyes, Lord: remove their blinkers!.. It is totally astounding how many details have come true, or have the clear possibility of fulfilment at any time... Do you realise that when Revelation was written, @ AD 90, the whole world population was less than 200 million? In 1961, Chairman Mao boasted that China alone could field 200 million militiamen 'at the drop of a hat' - the very figure Revelation forecast for oriental invaders!.. No doubt doubters class Zechariah 14 Armageddon prophecy, 2,500 years ago, as 'lunatic raving' too... It forecasts Antichrist invaders of Israel will have their flesh, eyes & tongues rotted while they stand... Napalm does that... Rev 17's 'great whore..Mystery Babylon' was forecast to HQ in the city of 7 hills: the Treaty of Rome founded the now-EU to fanfared visions of Revived Roman Empire, from founding father Monet, echoed by many EU leaders since& the new constitution betrays the antichrist agenda... We have more than enough biochem WMD to poison all waters, scorch all vegetation, destroy the ozone layer so the sun's rays scorch men, as in Revelation 16 & 19... Wake up out there!

Phil Elmore #fundie wnd.com

The latest deviancy they're trying to mainstream

Exclusive: Phil Elmore sees 'furry' perversion as next crack in society's foundation

Emily Gaudette, writing for Inverse, said it best early last month: “When Disney released an explanatory teaser for 2016’s ‘Zootopia,’ one could almost hear the sound of a billion DeviantArt accounts whirring to life. … The film’s teaser alone reads like an explanation of the furry manifesto: that anthropomorphized animals can be sexualized and identified with as easily as humans. … Could it be a coincidence that Disney chose a fox protagonist for its first fully anthro feature, considering foxes are arguably the most popular ‘fursona’ cited by furries? Many furries name the hero of Disney’s animated Robin Hood, also a fox, when recalling their first sexual feelings for anthropomorphized animals.”

Wait, what? Yes, you read that correctly: Disney’s new film, “Zootopia,” is arguably an attempt to mainstream “furry” sexuality – the practice of dressing up in fuzzy animal mascot costumes in order to engage in one’s perverted, prurient practices. This column has profiled the intersection between “furry” perversion and left-wing politics before. Already, the “otherkin” movement, in which various losers redefine themselves in terms of the animals and fantasy characters with which they “identify,” are posting lists of their preferred pronouns on their self-absorbed blogs. That’s where it starts. The more society in general becomes aware of this movement, the more it will creep into the mainstream of popular culture. Once lodged there, it will be impossible to root out, and society will be that much weaker for it.

When the debate over Obamacare produced the “Pajama Boy” meme, right-thinking people reacted in horror at the emasculation this imagery represented. It juvenilized young adults in a way that any real grownup would find repugnant. That is, after all, what the push toward societal acceptance – be it for furries, “otherkin,” “bronies,” transgenders, or some other sexually delusional perversion – is all about. If masculinity is the fuel on which society runs, on which innovation occurs, on which industries are built and on which wars are fought to protect a free people, then feminism, liberalism, furries, bronies, transgenders and the Star Wars cantina of progressive freaks with body image issues and self-esteem deficits is the sugar in society’s gas tank. Progressives hate themselves, so they invent new sexual personas and new deviancies to keep themselves entertained. Liberals hate families and decency, so they champion sexual perversion and child molestation while holding it up as viable “other” sexuality. Can there really be any doubt that the majority of “furries” are likely pedophiles?

As social media is used to promulgate countless delusional, perverted indulgences, society suffers. By embracing “furries” and other perverts, we are producing a population of incapable, weak-minded children. As our culture sags under the weight of these useless Pajama Boys and Pajama Girls, it is no wonder, then, that our foundations are beginning to show serious cracks. The mainstreaming of “furries” is the furthering of liberal destruction of society. It presages the extinction of the rational, responsible adults who once formed the backbone of our nation. This destruction started on social media, and it is there that this battle was, is and will be fought.

RXSSR #fundie stormfront.org

I notice that many liberals tend to come in large numbers. They tend to be highly connected. Having lots of connections increases stress, which increases conditions such as high blood pressure, stress issues, anxiety, depression, and other conditions which can result in a heart attack or stroke. And these things would make one want to do drugs to cope with these social struggles. Hence, most of these connected liberals do a lot of drugs. They want to legalize harmful drugs such as heroin, LSD, ecstasy, or marijuana.

Liberals tend to have lots of friends in grade school. They tend to have more followers, friends, likes, and subscribers on social media. Even on political websites such as NationStates, the liberals on there come in large numbers. Isn't being highly connected like that ruling your life? Like if a lot of people knew a lot of stuff about my personal life, I would freak out and not sleep due to always worrying about what all of these people would think of me. I don't understand why (or how - Probably drugs) liberals would come in large numbers.

Hippies have lots of sexual partners. Hippies are all about friends and family. Hippies have a lot of gaining on social media nowadays. Yet, hippies are all drugged up, they're probably doing drugs to cope with this. Liberals complain about slavery, yet they all follow each other through peer pressure, and enforcing capitalist values onto each other. If one doesn't do what the crowd does under peer pressure, then they are kicked out of the crowd. One liberal can't sit at a table with potheads if they're not a pothead. Liberals following each other like this is a form of slavery, except there is no official ruler, and that it is "equal."

I'm not a really connected person. I like my social privacy, my quietness, my own space, my own personal social freedom, and not worrying about what others think of me. Liberals are not like this, yet they are all drugged up to cope with this liberal struggle they put themselves into because they are degenerate sheep.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

The Demon That Is Megyn Kelly and the Demons that Run MSM

Go to Drudge right now and look at their number one article.

It says "Year of the Bull" with a big picture of Megyn Kelly.

Linking to this BS MSM article:

[link to www.usatoday.com]

Wow, just wow. These demons are trying like hell to hold their place. Everyone is seeing through the lies of MSM, yet they cannot shut up. Wow, they are really, really stupid.

Megyn Kelly is a demon working for the satanists that control MSM. Yet she keeps doing it. They should all be in jail yet they won't shut up. They can't handle Trump being president because they know they are screwed.

God I hope he throws so many of these evil people in jail for the lies they have told for years to the public.

And the article about Google and Facebook today on Drudge is equally as scary. It is linking to a Reuters article that cannot be posted on GLP for rights violations. But the Reuters article basically is saying that Google and Facebook are going to restrict "Fake" news sites.

HAHAHAHAHA! Google and Facebook help LYING MSM all the time!!! Those companies should be obsolete.

Reuters also participates in fake news.

They truly think people have not woken up. Well the masses have and that is why Trump got elected, you stupid MSM fools!

He better do more than kick the house of cards down. He better burn it to the ground.

All of MSM needs to die.

Wow, MSM truly is run by demons. No doubt about it!!!!!!!!!!

Eric Rowe #fundie new.facebook.com

[on a thread in the Barr for President group discussing the Constitution Party's platform]

"They want to establish a Republic based and guided on Biblical principles. That is called a theocracy."

No that's not a theocracy. All people are religious, including atheists. And all people have ethical systems that are based on their religion whatever that may be. And all people base their ideas of what government should and shouldn't to on their ethics. It's only a theocracy when they seek to legislate religion itself. Being pro-life is not theocratic. Neither is being for freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Though all of those ideas are ones that Christians hold on the basis of biblical principles.

"That platform states the government should discriminate against gays."

How does it say that government should discriminate against gays? You mean like in the military, which is something government should be in control of and has every right to run according to whatever is best without regard for political correctness, or do you mean that it says the federal government should somehow force the states to punish citizens for being gay? I highly doubt that anything in that platform says the latter.

Anonymous questioner #fundie gracethrufaith.com

My question is to resolve a debate between myself and another Bible studier. Could any of us be unknowingly walking around with Nephilim DNA and not know it? I don’t think so, but my friend disagrees…she is actually convinced that physically attractive, tall, well-built, intelligent people could be descendants of Nephilim. She has even suggested that my soon-to-be husband and myself are probably descended from Nephilim! Needless to say, this really freaks me out! I don’t want to worry that I have Nephilim DNA, or that my future husband may (we are both tall and athletically built and he is a handsome and mechanically brilliant man). Please, any insight at all would be tremendously helpful. I love my Jesus with all my heart and can’t bear the thought of being separated from God in eternity due to genetic circumstances beyond my control.

Michael T. Snyder #fundie charismanews.com

Did the United Nations Just Introduce a New World Order?
Have you heard of "the global goals"? If you haven't heard of them by now, rest assured that you will be hearing plenty about them in the days ahead.

On September 25th, the United Nations launched a set of 17 ambitious goals that it plans to achieve over the next 15 years. A new website to promote this plan has been established, and you can find it right here. The formal name of this new plan is "the 2030 Agenda", but those behind it decided that they needed something catchier when promoting these ideas to the general population. The U.N. has stated that these new "global goals" represent a "new universal Agenda" for humanity. Virtually every nation on the planet has willingly signed on to this new agenda, and you are expected to participate whether you like it or not.

Some of the biggest stars in the entire world have been recruited to promote "the global goals".

If you live in New York City, you are probably aware of the "Global Citizen Festival" that was held in Central Park on Saturday where some of the biggest names in the music industry promoted these new "global goals". The following is how the New York Daily News described the gathering:

"It was a party with a purpose.

"A star-studded jamboree and an impassioned plea to end poverty rocked the Great Lawn in Central Park as more than 60,000 fans gathered Saturday for the fourth-annual Global Citizen Festival.

"The feel-good event, timed to coincide with the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly, featured performances by Beyoncé, Pearl Jam, Ed Sheeran and Coldplay."

And it wasn't just the entertainment industry that was promoting this new U.N. plan for a united world. Pope Francis traveled to New York to give the address that kicked off the conference where this new agenda was unveiled:

"Pope Francis gave his backing to the new development agenda in an address to the U.N. General Assembly before the summit to adopt the 17-point plan opened, calling it "an important sign of hope" at a very troubled time in the Middle East and Africa.

"When Danish Prime Minister Lars Rasmussen struck his gavel to approve the development road map, leaders and diplomats from the 193 U.N. member states stood and applauded loudly.

"Then, the summit immediately turned to the real business of the three-day meeting — implementation of the goals, which is expected to cost $3.5 trillion to $5 trillion every year until 2030."

Wow.

OK, so where will the trillions of dollars that are needed to implement these new "global goals" come from?

Let me give you a hint – they are not going to come from the poor nations.

When you read over these "global goals", many of them sound quite good. After all, who wouldn't want to "end hunger"? I know that I would like to "end hunger" if I could.

The key is to look behind the language and understand what is really being said. And what is really being said is that the elite want to take their dream of a one world system to the next level.

The following list comes from Truthstream Media, and I think that it does a very good job of translating these new "global goals" into language that we can all understand ...

Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Translation: Centralized banks, IMF, World Bank, Fed to control all finances, digital one world currency in a cashless society
Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
Translation: GMO
Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Translation: Mass vaccination, Codex Alimentarius
Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Translation: U.N. propaganda, brainwashing through compulsory education from cradle to grave
Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Translation: Population control through forced "Family Planning"
Goal 6: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Translation: Privatize all water sources, don't forget to add fluoride
Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Translation: Smart grid with smart meters on everything, peak pricing
Goal 8: Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Translation: TPP, free trade zones that favor megacorporate interests
Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Translation: Toll roads, push public transit, remove free travel, environmental restrictions
Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries
Translation: Even more regional government bureaucracy like a mutant octopus
Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Translation: Big brother big data surveillance state
Goal 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Translation: Forced austerity
Goal 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts
Translation: Cap and Trade, carbon taxes/credits, footprint taxes
Goal 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Translation: Environmental restrictions, control all oceans including mineral rights from ocean floors
Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Translation: More environmental restrictions, more controlling resources and mineral rights
Goal 16: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Translation: U.N. "peacekeeping" missions (ex 1, ex 2), the International Court of (blind) Justice, force people together via fake refugee crises and then mediate with more "U.N. peacekeeping" when tension breaks out to gain more control over a region, remove 2nd Amendment in USA
Goal 17: Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
Translation: Remove national sovereignty worldwide, promote globalism under the "authority" and bloated, Orwellian bureaucracy of the U.N.

If you doubt any of this, you can find the official document for this new U.N. agenda right here. The more you dig into the details, the more you realize just how insidious these "global goals" really are.

The elite want a one world government, a one world economic system and a one world religion. But they are not going to achieve these things by conquest. Rather, they want everyone to sign up for these new systems willingly.

The "global goals" are a template for a united world. To many, the "utopia" that the elite are promising sounds quite promising. But for those that know what time it is, this call for a "united world" is very, very chilling.

AverageWhiteGuy #fundie topix.com

I dont feel any so called "christian love" but i do feel a deep sense of satisfaction in knowing this mindless savage is now dead and can no longer murder little innocent babies.

And yes all baby butchering freaks like him need to be shot and killed...whos next.

Keymaster #sexist mgtow.com

I need to buy a vowel because O….. MY….. GAWD. You just triggered a hundred memories.

That’s exactly what it’s like. And I have been in that room!
(“Sugar and spice and everything nice” my ass)

While an EPIC find… I am not at all surprised. I’m sure the rest of you are yawning here too. It serves as a good reminder though. I got a front row seat into the TRUE female nature and behavior when I moonlit as a part-time bartender (during my early-mid 20s) in nightclubs and various first-run establishments – including a brief stint as a relief bartender in a male strip club. The stories I have about that would turn your hair white.

But first… NO. I wore a shirt and tie at all times. So don’t get any ideas.

I knew what was up before most guys did. I remember thinking their boyfriends and husbands would PUKE if they knew. Women would come in in groups and they would be the type who would be THE LAST YOU WOULD EVER EXPECT to demonstrate the kind of behavior I saw. Chicks with Mary Tyler Moore haircuts that looked like bank tellers…. like the kind of “average” women you would expect to see in a female talk-show audience. Just plain Janes and average chicks who (within an hour or less) were shrieking and behaving like the most vile and ill-mannered and sluttiest of sluts. Like they had COMPLETELY been deceiving themselves (and everyone else) all their lives, and THIS evening, they were gonna let their hair down because their boyfriends and husbands weren’t looking.

And take my word for it. They were NOT just being someone else when they went out on this night, they were “being someone else” in their everyday lives. This was a consistent observation of hundreds of screaming women every weekend. Some of the groups would get called up on stage by the MC and be asked what they were celebrating tonight. Guess how many times the Queen Bee would say “MY DIVORCE!!!”…. and all of them would join in and shout “WOOO!!! WOOO!!!”.

You’ve heard of “woo girls”, yes?
I mean, I can understand “celebrating” a birthday, or an upcoming wedding.
But gathering all your “friends’ together to go out and “celebrate a divorce”?

There is something not right in the f~~~ing head with that.

There was a female strip club downstairs and it was always quiet. Guys would come in , clutch a beer or three, clap at the end of a set, slip the girl a couple of bucks, maybe get a table dance – strictly hands off or they would get booted. The men downstairs were TRULY “gentlemen” and ANY mis-behaving would have them escorted out. NO bulls~~~.

But the male strip joint was an eye opener free-for-all FREAK SHOW like you would not believe. I wore EAR PLUGS. I could go on about this for a week, but remember what brought them in was usually a birthday, or one of them was getting married the next day (or the following weekend). These “women” (I use the term loosely) would pay a stripper for a table dance in a private booth – with their fiancees credit card!! – and these poor suckers would also innocently pay for her entire evening, her “bachelorette” evening – including all drinks – and MORE.

On a nightly basis, a male stripper would give a table dance for $20 per song in a private booth. Typically 3 for $60. (About 15 minutes). The girl would get turned on, and ask to BLOW HIM. He said sure but it costs more. No problem . Her future husband is paying! So these girls would suck stranger stripper dick, AND SWALLOW.

She didn’t want a mess you know. She got all tarted up for this, so no facial with her friends around. So they just swallow! (you think she swallowed her fiancee’s load lately?)

Then the stripper says “that’s $160”.
The women would say “WTF?? I just sucked you off and swallowed!”
(they actually thought they wouldn’t have to pay him now. Typical.)

And he would say “Yeah. Thanks! But, what if the next chick wants the same thing? You owe me $160.”

Then these girls would add it to “the tab” and pay with their fiancees credit card….
and marry him the following week.

But that’s not all. Sometimes sucking him off was not enough. They would bend over and ask to be penetrated right in the ass. And they loved every second of it. Didn’t always happen in the booth, either. Sometimes it happened in the bathroom – with her bent over the f~~~ing TOILET.

Needless to say, I didn’t last long there. I couldn’t take it. I was a good private school boy with a classical education who made $300 a night in this s~~~hole. That was enough to finance my life quite nicely on top of my day jobs and that’s why I did it. $300 a night when you are 22 is not bad cash! But one day, I had seen enough and couldn’t unsee it. I didn’t feel right watching these unknown guys PAYING for the most animalistic, sick behavior I could imagine in my wildest nightmares. Or maybe the screaming noise just got to me one night.

So I took my cash register, handed it to the manager and walked out one night in the middle of the shift.
I walked ALL THE WAY HOME – about 4 hours – and thanked my personal God the whole way, it would never be me.

I wish to thank VileNord for posting this series of insights – directly from the source – as evidence that every word I just told you is true.

zombieApocExtraordinaire #fundie city-data.com

Rape is normal too, it happens everywhere with some frequency. Men were designed by nature to be able to have sex whenever we want (hence the penis).


Since the "rape" appears to just be fingering and masturbating over, I'd say the punishments are fair. I would hope this girl learned something but I doubt it. I wouldn't be surprised if the people in this thread are more outraged over this incident than the girl who was "raped."


[The charges go beyond "rape". Any current article will give you that info. Read a few and you might find out more as to what transpired.WOW, a girl gets violated and humiliated in more ways than one, and you doubt she wouldn't learn from it? Do you doubt that the boys will learn anything as well?Double WOW - based on your post it's clear that you can't see where the outrage is directed.]


The girl got fingered which is sexual assault but I doubt she internalized any humiliation being drunk and passed out. The boys got JV, and while they'll probably only serve about 6 months to 1 year before getting out, they'll be registered sex offenders for the rest of their lives.

As for this fingering thing, it happens so much to people passed out that I'm sure the boys didn't even know it was illegal. It's certainly misleading to call it rape.

[they got off easy]


If they raped her (penis into vagina), I would agree. But they will be sex offenders for the rest of their lives, their futures are not so bright anymore.

I just came from South Padre and witnessed young kids doing all these things to both men and women passed out from drinking too much. Urinating, stripping and taking photos next to the passed out person, fondling genitalia, tea bagging, etc I doubt any of these spring breakers will go to jail. I doubt the men and women violated feel all that violated in this culture, it's just considered normal. I think a lot of people in this thread are not fully aware what young people do these days.

One Million Moms #fundie onemillionmoms.com

Hotels.com is known for its comical Captain Obvious commercials, but its newest ad crosses the line and is completely irresponsible.

The offensive commercial begins with two friends who are on a play date with their children at a park. The women are bundled up in winter attire while one mom pushes her daughter on the swing, and the other mother is on her phone looking at social media while her baby is in the stroller beside her. Their mutual “friend” posts a picture of herself posing at a resort poolside on yet another warm weather vacation. One mother sarcastically responds aloud while typing: “Wow, so happy for you! Smiley face emoji.” Then Captain Obvious responds: “Funny how the words you type don’t reveal the jealousy you actually feel.” She replies to him with the famous tagline, “Thanks, Captain Obvious.”

Then her friend chimes in, “How is she there, and we’re here?” Captain Obvious glances at the baby in the stroller and the child on the swing, then very matter-of-factly says, “Condoms.”

Disappointed and envious, the moms nod their heads in agreement, and one responds, “True.”

This inappropriate commercial is airing during prime time when children are likely watching television. When this type of commercial airs too early in the evening, family viewing time is ruined. Can you imagine how this commercial makes children feel? Children are a blessing from the Lord, but according to Hotels.com, they are an inconvenience.

However, Hotels.com is not worried about the message it is sending, nor does it consider the fact that children often repeat what they hear. There is nothing funny about kids repeating the word “condoms.” Hotels.com should be ashamed!

Hotels.com will push away customers if it continues advertising in a repulsive manner that offends parents. Hotels.com needs to know that parents do not approve of its advertising tactic! If you are as passionate as One Million Moms is about removing this offensive commercial, please share this with your family and friends.

TAKE ACTION

If you agree this commercial is inappropriate, please sign our petition urging Hotels.com to pull its condom ad immediately.

Power Point Paradise #fundie powerpointparadise.com

Yes, my dear fellow human beings, it was SCIENTIFICALLY proven long ago that our ancient forebears experienced a catastrophic disaster that tilted the Earth just before 2345 B.C. The globe got such a blow that it wobbled on for over 2000 years until 1880 AD.

Our Earth got hit so bad by that Global Deluge that all our smart ancient patriarchs AND THEIR 500 ethnic descendant tribes still talked about it for MILLENNIA, no matter which branch of the Table of Nations they belong to.

Either the Earth got tilted by the heavy weight of the Northern ice-packs, or by the terrible “thruster-rocket” power of the many instant ‘fountains of the Earth’ of sub-crustal super-critical water (still extant under the crust today) spouting out from below through the crack-lines which opened up in the crust of Pangaea, as so pitifully portrayed in the upcoming movie ‘NOAH’, obviously also designed to obfuscate or “debunk” true history once more. Where did the water come from? Listen for once to the Guardian who knows where the water is, but not where it went 2400 BC. But being dim cultural Marxists, who can blame them? :)

image

Certainly Aaronofski’s poor excuse for “Noah’s Ark” looks like a very un-seaworthy leaky crate! It would shatter and sink before it’d ever start to float! Yet another big wopper in Hellywood’s long line of Weapons of Mass Deceptions! WMD!

I’ve actually been wishing for a long time that Mel Gibson would have tackled a Noah movie, in his own inimitable way! I was actually gonna try to contact him, but didn’t know how to. I should have tried harder, but sad to say…I didn’t. After all, now Aaronofski is massacring true Ancient History. Ah! He might as well, so all the liars condemn themselves.

But perhaps it is not too late for Mel to do a real version with 2015 CG effects! Does anyone know how to contact Mel? Are you reading this Mel? I’d love to be one of your advisers! I actually started a screen-play once. Leave a comment with some email. You are not too old yet, to move the world once more big time!

The real historical super-critical water-fountains were so powerful and jetting up so high that some water-propelled rock-debris even escaped Earth’s gravity causing mares (lava-seas) and craters in the Moon, oh, and not to forget our comets and asteroids that are slowly beginning to return en masse?

Actually scientists just recently discovered that the water on the Moon is the same kind of water as on Earth! Oh really? Wow! Who could have expected such a thing! Amazing those ‘scientists’, no? Some actually have a clue! Or two? :) This time in the Mail!

image

Either the water-jets from the cracks were initially more powerful or numerous on one side of the Earth that caused it to tilt, otherwise the tilt may have been caused by the eventually developing Northern Ice pack resulting from the Flood. We personally do not believe it was caused by an impact of some huge asteroid, as no impact zone exists for it.

The cracks in the crust, caused by very hot pressurized super-critical water of volcanic nature, heated up the ocean so much, that it resulted in a huge REAL Climate Change around that time. The warming ocean vaporised up into a thick cover of rain-clouds coming down as lots of snow in the North and South turning into the icecap in the North, and as rain eroding the Sphinx in Egypt!

The snow soon turned into huge kilometers thick ice packs bringing down the ocean levels by 125 Meters. Whereas there was land in the Northern hemisphere able to catch the snow, down South Antarctica had not yet descended into a polar position by continental drift, like the Piri Reis Map testifies, obviously drawn before the Ice Age.

That copy of an ancient source map, and the Oronteus Finaeus map inserted below, shows Antarctica without ice, and in a more Northern position just below Africa at the end of the upturned tail of South America, before the continental drift really got going, during the days of Peleg, “when the Earth was divided!”

image

That means that then the snow in the South mostly fell into the ocean and melted, whereas in the North it could continually build up in Alaska, North America, Europe, and Siberia, causing a great weight shift to the North.

That weight may have precipitated that 26.5 degree tilt around 2345 B.C., but I am not a physicist so I’m not sure if it could have had the tilting effect.

Perhaps it is more likely that the main force of the “Fountains of the Earth” was more powerful at one side of the Earth, functioning like a Vernier thruster rocket on a space vehicle. I personally lean towards that interpretation.

But whatever mechanism precipitated that tilt, the direct unique cause was the Global Flooding of the Earth, documented around that same time in the Book of Genesis. There is no record of any other great disaster around 2345 BC than only the Global Deluge, as proven by Dodwell, which is the massive MAMMOTH in the Historical & Geological Livingroom!

What All This Means For Us?

It means that a Total Global Destruction of everything in the entire antediluvian civilisation that existed before, did really happen! But what that also means, is that the following terms, names, concepts, labels and paradigms that we have been bombarded with since we were old enough to “watch TV”, are bogus, false, non-existent, total fiction, and globalist weirdness, myths and fabrications!

“Pre-History, Stone Age, Paleolithic, Neolithic, Cavemen, Hunter Gatherers, Neanderthalers, Lucy, Peking Man, Macro Evolution, etc! And Darwin, Lyell, Hutton, Huxley, Dawkins, Gould, and many others, are all liars, crooks, deceivers, and supplanters, chosen, selected and promoted to confuse and alienate us all from the Life that is within our spirits, our conscience from our loving Creator.

It was all designed to make you believe that you are nothing else but a happenstance of chance and a spermatozoan coincidence without any greater destiny, rhyme or reason, so that you might as well commit suicide because there is no Father Creator who loves and cares for you, and you are just a meaningless blip on the temporary evolutionary screen of Time.

It proves again how we have been severely brainwashed by the Bankers’ Rhodes scholars into believing the fairytale that we descended from “primate-monkeys” and “Lucy” in Africa, and that we are “getting smarter” via Paleolithic cavemen and “Neanderthalers” into hunter-gathererers, who finally learned agriculture and how to built huts and domesticate cows, etc. Whereas we are actually getting dumbed down into deceived media dupes at the bottom of the gene-pool!

It is a very astute 150 years old conspiracy by International Globalists who control the media and education, to use the dislike of God of some among us who were cramped in their style having to “love their neighbour”, and could use a good cop-out.

The Globalists were more than willing to oblige with a false narrative based on the “terrible lizard” (dinosaur) theory, as “early T-Fords of Evolution”, that started “65 million years ago”, whereas we “Homo Sapiens” (meaning “wise man” as compared to “cavemen!” Ha!) only started “3-4 million years ago.”

It is a gross lie, my dears. The Emperor has no clothes on whatsoever, and you have been taken for such a grandiose ride, that they are continually laughing all the way to their banks about our stupidity, with your money!

I know, it is hard to change your world-view plus to suddenly get the wise cracks from the uninformed who still believe the tailors of the Emperor, although they see nothing. It’s just that they don’t want people to think they are stupid. Poor guys!

That is how the tailors work, see. They manufactured global peer pressure through the damned mainstream media to make everyone stupid although they tell them that they are very smart to believe that they originated from an explosion in space, and rain on the rocks for millions of years, and through non-existent positive mutations that even Dawkins can’t remember or quote.

So now it is up to you. You continue on being dumb in their eyes and “smart” in your own, or you take the unpopular red pill and we will show you how deep the rabbit hole really goes.

I told you, from the beginning of this article, that most of the masses wouldn’t believe in this conspiracy, and ridicule us as aluminum foil heads. It’s OK. They will find out one day anyway, but sadly, then it will be too late for quite a long time…. But don’t say we didn’t tell or warn them…

A LIGHT TO YOUR TRUTH #fundie rr-bb.com

[She's so happy that her child had a nightmare.]

My Son said "Mommy I need to talk to you" So i sat down he said I had a scarry dream.....he said he dreamed:: we were driving in a car me him his brother and the windows were up and he could see many tornados everywhere (twisters he called them) he said he seen many and they were around our church we used to attend but we moved so we have started going to another church. anyways he said he heard a voice say " (which totally amazed me!)I am that i am...I am jesus christ the son of God"" and then suddenly we vanished! he said he could see our clothes on the ground and that he was looking down from Heaven through a hole and could see FIRE AND TORNADOES EVERYWHERE THE GRASS WAS BURNING ! tHEN the hole closed up..he woke up at that moment.

Now this is a dream my 9 year old had. not to mention i have had a few rapture dreams and tsunami dreams past months..i have posted my rapture dreams---I have no doubt this dream was from god that my son had!!! WOW [happy dancing emoticon]

GOD IS AWESOME ..THIS DREAM HE HAD WAS RECENT TOO MAYBE 2 MONTHS AT MOST.....jESUS IS ON HIS WAY TO RESCUE US..CAN YOU FEEL IT?!?

Baldrick Cunningplan #fundie evcforum.net

The question isn't how I sleep at night. The question is how you don't choke to death, what with all the bullshit spewing from your mouth. The idea that "homophobia" (a fictitious word fabricated by liberals) is comparable to ethnic discrimination is utterly comical (although not in any way that makes me laugh), as is the idea that there's something wrong with the latter. I have the right to take away the happiness of homosexuals, just as I have the right to take away the happiness of any pedophile or any other breed of subhuman. The happiness of sick freaks must never come at the expense of the basic human sense of right and wrong. It certainly must not come at the expense of what is best for children. Anyone who supports abortion must hang from the neck till dead (it's genuinely nothing but baby-murdering...but I guess women don't have a problem with killing millions of babies as long as women get all the rights they want and don't have to experience any physical discomfort), but I can safely tell you that, were I not yet born, and I had sentience and the option of either being raised by homosexuals or being aborted, I would choose abortion without a second thought. If it's not wrong to discriminate against homosexuals then it can't possibly be wrong to elect the Grand Dragon of the KKK for president. How do I sleep at night? No. The question is how do YOU sleep at night?

And yes, I know that I supposedly supported abortion just now after saying anyone who does must die, but I already know that, so don't be a smartass. And I would be aborting myself, not anyone else.

David Catchpoole #fundie creation.com

Did dinos give rise to birds? No—they ate them
Dino-ate-birds
by David Catchpoole

A fossil of the small theropod dinosaur Sinocalliopteryx gigas found in Liaoning, China, was so well preserved that researchers were able to make out its intact stomach contents.1 They were able to see the last thing it had eaten—a bird dinner. As the bird had only been partially digested (indicating death of the Sinocalliopteryx had occurred not long after its last meal) the researchers were even able to identify the species of the bird: Confuciusornis sanctus.

What’s more, that bird specimen was not the only one found in the dinosaur’s stomach. There was another Confuciusornis sanctus carcass as well, and “both were in a similar state of partial digestion”.1 Given that “remains as delicate as small bird bones have presumably short digestion periods”, the researchers conclude, logically enough, that the two Confuciusornis birds must have been consumed in fairly rapid succession, “in order for the first individual not to have had time to be digested noticeably beyond that of the second.”1

bird-dino
Evidently the dinosaur liked eating birds, because there were the remains of a third bird in its stomach too, in a somewhat more advanced state of digestion, which the researchers say might also have been a Confuciusornis. Paleontologist Scott Persons mused, “The fact that this Sinocalliopteryx had not one but three undigested birds in its stomach indicates it was a voracious eater and a very active hunter.”2

The secular uniformitarian models, based on the idea that ‘the present is the key to the past’, really don’t even begin to make sense of the fossils even just at Liaoning, let alone globally
How did this fossil, and many other fossils at Liaoning similarly “exquisitely preserved”,3 with even “abdominal contents in exquisite detail” being preserved,4 come to be this way? The secular uniformitarian models, based on the idea that ‘the present is the key to the past’, really don’t even begin to make sense of the fossils even just at Liaoning, let alone globally. Rather, knowing what really happened in the past is the key to understanding the present world—including fossils. The Bible tells us of a global catastrophic event, the Flood of Noah’s day, about 4,500 years ago. This is why we find billions of fossils in sedimentary rock worldwide.

journal
This correct understanding utterly washes away the millions of years so needed by the evolutionary paradigm. Textbooks, museums, and television documentaries promoting that paradigm have said that over millions of years dinosaurs gave rise to birds, which in turn evolved the ability to fly. But the Confuciusornis birds in the dinosaur’s stomach were birds “capable of powered flight”,1 and also had a beak rather than teeth. And as this is not the first dinosaur discovered with bird remains in its belly,5 where does that leave the millions-of-years dino-to-bird scenario? No wonder that evolutionists are “in a flap”.6

Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

Today the Theory of Evolution is very popular.  That theory says that you weren’t created, you’re just the random product of countless meaningless coincidences.  Evolution teaches that everything that exists only exists as a freak accident.  Evolutionists look around at the vast complexity of the universe and insist that there is no evidence that God exists.  Yet if you take those same Evolutionists into your house, show them the simple design of walls and a roof and ask them how it got there, the Evolutionists will say it’s obvious that someone with purpose and intelligence constructed the house.  This is the irony of Evolutionists: they can find two rocks stacked on top of each other in a field and observe certain details about the rocks that make it clear to them that someone intentionally placed one rock on another a very long time ago.  Then they get super excited about their finding and right a bunch of books about it.  Yet when they look around at the vast complexity of the universe, they say the whole thing exists by random chance and they adamantly insist that it is impossible to ever prove the existence of an intelligent Creator.  How can people talk so stupidly and not even hear how ridiculous they are being?  Well, without the illumination of the Holy Spirit, we are all stupid, and even when we’re surrounded by a ton of evidence for something, we can’t recognize it.

Mike King #sexist tomatobubble.com

Though modern libtards and Marxified millennials will no doubt gush over this "feel good" story; to a traditionalist with a healthy appreciation and respect for true womanhood, true motherhood, and healthy culture, there is so much bloody wrong with this pathetic comedy unfolding down in New Zealand.

Jacinda Ardern is a 37 year-old New Zealand feminist Globalist libtard who became Prime Minister in October, 2017. During her campaign, she attracted international media attention when she bitchily denounced the male interviewer who had asked whether she planned to have children and take maternity leave if elected. Ardern -- oblivious to the fact that she serves the public -- was applauded for defiantly telling the interviewer (and by extension, the public) that it was “totally unacceptable in 2017” for women in the workplace to have to answer such a question.

Arden joins Refrigerator Solberg of Norway, the Frumpy Frau of Germany and Mamma May of the UK as female leaders of libtarded nations. Well, at least she is much easier on the eyes than the other three rancid hags.

Now, just a few months later, Ms. Ardern, who is not married, has announced that she is expecting her first child, due in June. A bit of basic math confirms that she must have already been pregnant while running for Prime Ministerette. How very "modern" of her. But there's more. Her "partner" and "baby daddy," Clarke Gayford, has just announced that he will take leave from his job after the birth to become a stay-at-home dad. Still more modern comedy, straight from the article:

"She admitted that her family’s situation was unusual in some ways, saying that she had suffered “pretty bad” morning sickness during the first three months while forming a new government, and that she did not know “how the government cars would feel about having a baby seat in them.”

Ms. Ardern said she planned to work right up until she gives birth and would then take six weeks of parental leave. During that time, she said, the deputy prime minister, Winston Peters, will assume her duties.

After that, Ms. Ardern added, she planned to return to “full duties,” with Mr. Gayford traveling with her and their child as often as possible."

This drama is really a dream-come-true for the modern libtard. It's got everything -- a vomiting female Prime Minister who is an unwed mother, set to collect parental leave pay while the de-balled and dutiful "baby daddy" adapts to his "stay-at-home" subordinate role. We wonder, will the Prime Ministerette be breast-feeding or breast-pumping into little plastic bottles, as she rides in the back of her limo while she and baby-daddy are out and about on state visits? Oh what a horrible example of "family life" to set for the young women and men of New Zealand!

The new Prime Ministerette and P-whipped First Baby Daddy of New Zealand?

It is not out of disrespect for women, but rather, to the contrary, out of the highest respect for women that Sugar and I, er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times can only heap mockery upon this sordid spectacle. A woman's place -- especially for a new mother -- and her ultimate satisfaction in life is to be found in the "hearth and home," not the bloody, nasty, and intrinsically dishonest world of politics. We understand that that the modern debt-based capitalist-communist economy requires many miserable mothers to work because one income is often insufficient to carry a household. But that is certainly not the case with "baby daddy" here -- who is (soon-to-be "was") a well-paid host of a TV fishing show.

Indeed, British Queen Victoria -- though she naively allowed the despicable Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (cough cough) to undermine the long term interests of the Empire -- was spot-on correct when she looked into the future and warned about feminism and women in politics:

"I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of "Women's Rights", with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to "unsex" themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection. I love peace and quiet, I hate politics and turmoil. We women are not made for governing, and if we are good women, we must dislike these masculine occupations."

Tell it Queenie, tell it!

And yet, we doubt that even Queen Victoria could have foreseen this idiotic modern freak show that is still developing down in New Zealand, with similar situations throughout the western world.

YIKES!

A few of the "hateful, heathen and disgusting" finger-waving maniacs that Queen Victoria accurately foresaw: Killary Rotten Clinton, Senator Elizabeth "Pocahontas" Warren, Congresswoman Maxi-Pad Waters

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the Prime Minister of New Zealand is expecting a baby and will take maternity leave.

Boobus Americanus 2: That great. It sets a wonderful example of what is possible for our daughters.

Sugar: Boobuss, you pathetic little mangina! Thiss brazen little husssy needss to ressign, quit her left-wing politicss, marry the father and sstay home to raisse her litter -- like I did.

Editor: It's a shame that your ungrateful little kittens never call you.

Jon Rappoport #conspiracy jonrappoport.wordpress.com

"Logic students used to learn: you can have a perfectly valid argument, even if your premises, your first assumptions are completely false. Well, if the argument is about politics, your conclusion will be insane. Implementing the conclusion will earn you praise as you destroy lives. What we’re talking about here is a species of mind control.” ](The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

What’s the latest solution to the virus that causes nothing?

Here we go.

Punch line: MIT Technology Review, 2/8/16: “We have the technology to destroy all Zika mosquitoes.”

“A controversial genetic technology able to wipe out the mosquito carrying the Zika virus will be available within months, scientists say.

“The technology, called a 'gene drive,’ was demonstrated only last year in yeast cells, fruit flies, and a species of mosquito that transmits malaria. It uses the gene-snipping technology CRISPR to force a genetic change to spread through a population as it reproduces.

“Three U.S. labs that handle mosquitoes, two in California and one in Virginia, say they are already working toward a gene drive for Aedes aegypti, the type of mosquito blamed for spreading Zika. If deployed, the technology could theoretically drive the species to extinction. (emphasis added)

“’We could have it easily within a year,’ says Anthony James, a molecular biologist at the University of California, Irvine.

“Any release of a gene drive in the wild would be hotly debated by ecologists … But with Zika sowing fear across Latin America and beyond, the technology is likely to get a closer look. Four weeks ago we were trying to justify why we are doing this. Now they’re saying “Get the lead out,”’ says James. It’s absolutely going to change the conversation.’”

No kidding.

Unforeseen consequences? Unpredicted results? Ecological domino effect? Transfer of genes from mosquitoes to humans? Don’t be silly. All is well. Don’t worry, be happy. Move straight ahead with your mouth shut and your eyes closed.

In previous articles, I’ve been reviewing the basics of covert ops, because Zika fits the bill. In this case, take a virus that causes nothing, falsely link it to a tragic condition (babies born with small heads and brain damage), and then slide in the real agendas. I’ve already spelled out some of those plans, which are materializing in front of our eyes.

Gene editing is a towering plan: technocrats don’t like a species — wipe it out.

Build up the threat with lies and obfuscations and false science and wall-to-wall propaganda — then introduce the grand solution.

Depopulation turns out to be easy. Just reconfigure genes. Snip-snip.

The Zika virus isn’t “sowing fear,” as the MIT Review claims. The World Health Organization is inventing that fear. In the 70 years since Zika was discovered, it has, at worst, caused mild transient illness. Now, suddenly, it’s supposed to be creating radical birth defects. Of course, the Brazilian researchers can only find a possible correlation between Zika and the birth defect in 17 cases. Seventeen. Maybe.

But never mind. Wipe out all the mosquitoes that may be carrying Zika. Wipe out the whole species.

And come to think of it, could a case be made that certain human populations are destructive and, well, superfluous? There are people who think so. They also think that, in the onrush of automation and AI, efficient robots could replace those useless populations.

Face it. Despite all the warnings about viruses running out of control and wiping out half the world, the depopulation freaks just haven’t been able to put a dent in the global population. They hope, they pray, but no dice.

However, they have been able to produce one result: planting fear of viruses in humans. They’re adequate to that task. So wake up and smell the cover story.

“In order to destroy the imminent threat of viruses and save the human race, we must turn to cutting-edge technology: gene editing. That’s our ultimate hope.”

Destroy the village in order to save it.

Here are the final paragraphs of the MIT article:

“But a gene drive [gene editing] can also make mosquito populations disappear. The simplest way to do that is to spread a genetic payload that leads to only male offspring. As the 'male-only' instructions spread with each new generation, eventually there would be no females left, says Adelman. His lab discovered the Aedes aegypti gene that determines sex only last spring. The next step will be to link it to a gene drive.

“Kevin Esvelt, a gene-drive researcher at MIT’s Media Lab who has been outspoken about the need to proceed cautiously, also thinks Aedes aegypti eradication should be the goal, so long as the public is onboard and the safety of the idea proved.

“’Technologically, we could probably do it in a couple of years,’ says Esvelt. I’m sure we’ll be able to do it before people can agree if we should.’”

Did you get that last piece? The “cautious” scientist says: what the hell, let’s eliminate a whole species if “the public is onboard” and we prove it’s safe.

How to prove safety before launch? Hard to say. Basically, try it and then we’ll know. Vote for the bill and then you can read what’s in it. Allow a global explosion of GMO crops based on zero science about health and economic consequences, and see what happens. Expand the list of mandated vaccines for children from six to 60 and see what happens. Spray poisonous pesticides all over the planet and see what happens.

Only cranks and conspiracists and rubes and yokels and Luddites and tree huggers and bitter clingers oppose the march of science. How about editing their genes? It would make things so much easier.

Wipe out the mosquitoes. One small step for man, one giant step for mankind. Today, the mosquito, tomorrow the (fill in the blank).

The mind plays tricks:

“Listen, we’re not talking about depopulation in general. Don’t be silly. We’re just going to wipe out one species of very troublesome insect that’s wreaking havoc. Come on. It’s just once. We’ll never do it again. We’re not crazy. We’re researchers. Just give us a chance. Please. We want to launch the experiment and watch it with joy. That’s what we do. Just once. It’s our present under the Xmas tree.”

Why not? All you have to do is forget the giant clue that’s clubbing you on the head:

The virus they’re going to stop causes nothing.

What are they counting on? They’re counting on you not being able to believe the virus causes nothing. They’re betting on that.

They’re betting you’re in the trance they created.

Rosalind Innes #fundie physicalfeministresources.tumblr.com

Crucial to the ideological notion of ‘rape’ is the concept of consent. Rape is sexual act of a man against a woman - it is conceived by the bourgeois legal apparatus to be an act of heterosexual intercourse without the consent of the woman…Its criminal nature centers on this question of consent. Thus the law, based on the ideological construct of equality and thus 'free choice’ makes a sharp distinction between heterosexual intercourse which is freely consensual and that which isn’t, the latter legally constituting rape.

It would seem to be obvious at this point that one effect of the ideological function of 'rape’ is to obscure sexual relations between men and women. To make a qualitative distinction between rape and consensual heterosexuality on the basis of such a profoundly ideological concept as bourgeois equality, is not only to indulge in political naivete but to avoid an analysis of sexuality as a whole. It is to avoid what is essential to an understanding of rape - a scientific analysis of the way in which capitalism organizes sexuality.

—Rosalind Innes, Rape Ideology and the Maintenance of Women’s Oppression, June 1977

Anonymous #fundie moonbattery.com

[Discussing the "Up Your Alley (Gay Pride) Fair" in San Francisco.]

This just goes to show you that gay people are sick fucks pure and simple. I saw some of the pictures and I had to close the tab.

I think gay men for the most part were pussified when they were younger and grew up gay or molested as young men. No one is born gay, that entire logic is bullshit. No one in their right mind would have that type of sex in public. This shows you what a Sodom and Gomorrah that flea bitten city is.

And don't get me started on lesbians. I think lesbian women for the most (and most dykes don't look like the porn chicks) are women who have had bad experiences with men and have given up. Haven't you noticed that most dykes are fat and ugly? Seriously no man would tap that unless he'd been in solitary confinement for years.

This is a freak show pure and simple. Any parent who brought their kid to this fair should rot in hell and have their parental rights revoked permanently.

Napoleon de Geso #sexist #psycho incels.co

[LDAR] Femoids disgusting

No went to lay in bed for short time, and saif "FUUU', because thought how femoids are disgusting creatures, not expressions of my hopes and dreams. And even if somehow be possible to find waifu - unless of impossibly higly cultured, also will be some cunt, not being whos purpose is to fulfill my hopes and dreams, to be embodiment of my ideals about purity and culture

FUUUUUUU


Genetically engineered catgirls for domestic ownership when?..image

Larry Tomczak #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Recently, right-wing commentator Larry Tomczak unveiled something he is calling the "30 Day Bullseye Challenge," which consists of 30 short videos outlining the proper Christian worldview on everything from abortion and capital punishment to masturbation and sexting.

Several of the videos, unsurprisingly, address topics related to the issue of homosexuality, which Tomczak explained inevitably leads to disease and misery.

"With all the hoopla about this one and that one, hey, they're coming out and it being a time to celebrate gay marriage and gay lifestyles as normal, natural, beautiful," he said, "people need to awaken ... to the reality that this so-called love story doesn't have a happy ending."

While rattling off a list of statistics about the supposed dangers of gay sex, Tomczak warned that "although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by a ratio of at least 20 to 1, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses."

"Depending on the source, homosexual men have an average lifetime number of sexual partners falling anywhere between — listen to this — 250 to 500," he continued. "Engaging in sodomy with the sewage system of another's anatomy is contrary to God's design and it will bring inevitable consequences."

Cor Scorpii #conspiracy 7heavenastrology.wordpress.com

Even though the aversion between Gemini and Capricorn is mitigated because they are of the same ascension, Mars is still thoroughly incapacitated to act because the 12th house is cadent while his lord Mercury is also there – there’s no ‘way out’ for him since no (preferably) angular planet is able to lend it assistance, i.e. reflect his light to Capricorn. Mars is occidental of the Sun (additional weakness) in a masculine sign and quadrant, contrary to sect and above the earth in a day chart, all of which are factors that make his condition very unfavorable so the enemies are unable to do much harm to Constantinople and are prone to self-destructive behavior. If one looks at the chart from the perspective of POF serving as an alternative ascendant one gets a similar picture regarding enemies. Mars is lord of the 7th and it is in the cadent 9th, while Venus culminates in the 10th, co-present with the sect-benefic, Jupiter which receives her. What is most intriguing about this chart for me, however, is its ascendant in Cancer, the sign which it occupies in Thema mundi as well. I cannot stop wondering if Valens was thinking in terms of creating a city which would lie at the heart of a world-dominating empire? After all,Constantinople did endure for 1123 years under its original name, which is fascinatingly close to the greatest years of Venus (1150) and she is lady of the Sun, the chart luminary/hyleg and hence the giver of years of life. Ironically, some 300 years later a new religion, signified by Venus, entered the world stage in today’s Saudi Arabia and the Ottoman army which ultimately conquered Constantinople carried its banners. However, there’s another version of electional chart for Constantinople and it can be found in Luca Gaurico or Lucas Gauricus (Italy,1476-1558) Tractatus astrologicus http://warburg.sas.ac.uk/pdf/fah1940w.pdf

The main difference between the two lies in the position of the ascendant and hence, of the all-important POF. In Gaurico’s chart, the ascendant is in the 6th degree of Cancer tightly conjunct Jupiter and Venus making the two considerably more prominent and powerful than is the case with the first chart which has the ascendant in the 19th degree of Cancer. Gaurico’s version puts the POF in the 3rd WS (but the 4th mundane house) in the 24th degree of Virgo, which locates Venus and Jupiter in the 11th from it, the house of acquisition and gain. But why would Valens decide to put the benefics in the 11th from POF rather than in the 10th, which is a lot more auspicious since the benefic angle of the 10th is always preferable to the succeedent 11th? Moreover, if POF lands in Virgo, the contrary to sect malefic and its ruler in the 12th culminate from it, which is disastrous, as Mars rules the 7th house of enemies by exaltation and Mercury is the lord of the 12th, known as “bad daimon”. If the POF is in Libra, these two fall cadent from both ascendants! That is why I think that the first version is more likely to represent the moment chosen by Valens.

Nevertheless, the second version may have much more significance when looked through the lenses of prophecies which never fail to fascinate me. In short, whether they were uttered by the famous German seers (Alois Irlmaier http://www.schauungen.de/wiki/index.php?title=Alois_Irlmaier “Waldviertler” http://www.schauungen.de/wiki/index.php?title=Waldviertler), Greek orthodox monks (elder Josif from Vatopedi monastery, elder Paisios, etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rP4ts8cmNNg ) or Muslim eschatologist Sheikh Imran Hosein https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEcUGZT-zoo they all boil down to (more or less!) one thing – Istanbul will be Constantinople again, when Russia rushes to aid Greece and defeats and destroys the invading Turkey during the World War III. Allegedly, only the Hagia Sophia will be left standing after the fiercest fighting during the “three days of darkness” mentioned in many European prophecies ranging from the Middle ages to present. The city itself is undoubtedly of primary strategic importance, as it controls the passage from the Black sea to the Mediterranean; the Russian army has already tried to conquer it during the Russo – Turkish war (1877 – 78) but was forced to a halt by a powerful British fleet. This time there’s no fleet powerful enough to intimidate and stop the Russians when the war breaks out.

But when could this prophecy be fulfilled? I have no doubts that it actually CAN come to pass, as the current state of global affairs doesn’t testify to the possibility of peaceful resolution of all the tensions/conflicts brewing between East and West, i.e. Russia and the USA/NATO. With this in mind, I’ll examine “signs of the times” within the context of traditional mundane astrology. The ‘greater picture’ is under the jurisdiction of the horoscope of the revolution of the world in which the triplicity shift of the superiors occurred in the sign of Capricorn (1841) having significance up to 2020. when the conjunctions of the superiors again shift to airy triplicity (the so-called ‘middle conjunction’).

So how does this chart relate to the chart of Constantinople and what does it signify? First of all, it is significant that oriental Mars in Scorpio dominates the conjunction from a superior sextile and most importantly, its twelfth-part lands in Capricorn and Ibn Ezra tells us in his Book of the World that “…one should always…find the sign in which the power of the dodecatemoria occurs, whether from the malefic or the benefic planet. Know that the power of the dodecatemoria is stronger in a great than in a middle conjunction and stronger in a middle than a small conjunction, and stronger in a small conjunction than at the revolution of any year.”

“So you should observe the place of Mars at any conjunction, whether great, middle of small. For if it is with Saturn or Jupiter at the revolution of the year, or in opposition or quartile with them, wars will break out in the world. This will occur when the terminal sign [annual profection] of the conjunction reaches the place of Mars.”

And Kusyar ibn Labban in his Introduction to Astrology states that “When a planet is in the dodecatemorion of <another> planet, it (the former) is in application with it (the latter). When it (a planet) is in the dodecatemorion of a house in the diagram of the horoscope, it is the same as when it is situated in this house. By the kindness and favour of God.”

So one can say that this was not simply a conjunction of the two, but of all the three superiors, with Mars gaining the (additional) dignity of exaltation and impressing its significations upon the symbolism of the conjunction itself. How did this manifest? Well, suffice it to say that humanity witnessed both world wars in this period, not to mention all the numerous, bloody ‘smaller’ conflicts that occurred before and after; the modernization of weapons which led to their increased lethality, causing death/destruction on a scale heretofore unseen. Most importantly, mankind gained the ability to destroy the entire planet by harnessing the power of nuclear chain reaction. Mars at its best (exaltation=kingdom/supremacy), pure and simple – apart from the very important fact that the conjunction itself is so clearly dominated by the greater malefic, Saturn whereas the grater benefic Jupiter is in the sign of its fall=dejection/depression/slavery and firmly in Saturn’s power. There really hasn’t been much mercy, benevolence and moderation in this period, has it? The malefics have dominated it so clearly! That is why I maintain that also the World War III will occur within this period, and that will be the time when the prophecies regarding the city may find their fulfillment.

I'm a ramblin' man #announcement

This'll probably be my last Shy Says post here. After this, they'll have their own separate blog hosted on the site.

Also, I typed this up more or less stream-of-conscious, and afterward I put aside tags around the parts where I strayed too far from my original topic. I haven't done anything resembling proofreading any of it. But I'm letting it stand as it is for now.

Something I really want to do but don't know how to go about even figuring out where to start is making public all of the statistics that I've collected from what the comment filter evolved into. Funny how The Frog thought he 'won' because he made me waste my time making that filter. In reality, I love statistics, especially corpus statistics, and I obviously love programing, so it should go without saying that I legitimately enjoyed making the filter, so much so that it's morphed into something well beyond its original purpose. It now analyzes comments in other ways besides detecting Le Frog and other trolls and even does the same kind of analysis on quotes too. Unfortunately, it ain't easy to put all of the data and statistics together in a user-friendly form that's easy to read, browse, and manipulate so you guys can explore and have fun with it.

That's not to mention the problem of organizing the code and getting it into a form that can even run on the current host. For the curious, the filter started its life as a well-organized and structurally coherent set of three VB module files and one C# class file. The C# class was later translated into VB when the quote comment page was, since it is closely tied to it. It originally intercepted comments with unusually high, low, or average troll scores and sent a copy of them to my FSTDT email so I could add them to the corpus of training material. It would then discard comments and perform a progressive IP ban if they had a high score, or returns comments back to the quote-comment page code to be posted as normal if they had a low or average score.)

Now it's become a disorganized, ad-hoc set of seven VB modules, three Object Pascal* unit files (compiled in either Delphi or FreePascal depending on the operating system I'm compiling on), one Ada file mostly written by my BFF / modly minion Mikey, and two JavaScript files that I wrote to run in Node.js when I was testing out how well it worked with databases (the verdict on that: comme ci, comme ça). Code in three two of those languages won't even run on the current host. I could probably get the Object Pascal to compile with Delphi.NET after some adjustments. The code only started branching away from things like "written in one language" and " organized structure" after I started analyzing comments for fun and the whole thing was taking on a life of its own. Around that time, it also somehow began to take on a secondary role as personal playground for experimenting with programming languages.

[aside]*I'm using Object Pascal here in the sense that a lot of Pascal-dabblers nowadays use it, i.e. to describe a modern and quasi-standard dialect or "style" of writing Pascal code that can be compiled by at least both Delphi and FreePascal, and possibly other Pascal languages (e.g. GNU Pascal) if you adhere to a stricter subset of "Object Pascal" in this sense. Confusingly, Object Pascal is also originally what Borland called the last couple versions of its Pascal compiler for DOS (whose very last version also apparently had a hilariously bad, half-assed Windows port). Indeed, this old-school Object Pascal is essentially Turbo Pascal with object orientation (or a ridiculous attempt thereat in the case of the Windows port). Aside from their core syntax and lexicon, that Object Pascal and "Object Pascal" in the sense here are dramatically different. Most code more complex than "Hello world" written in the latter is not compatible with the original Object Pascal in any useful sense unless it was intentionally written to be. And that's your programming-language history lesson for today.[/aside]

In addition to being written in as many languages as your average Dutchman can speak, another fairly major hurdle to making this little pet project public is that both the quotes and comments I've fed it to analyze (originally "train") and the interesting parts of the analyses thereof are stored on my private server in an SQLite database. Our current host Does Not Allow Using SQLite, despite their terms of use saying nothing to that effect or even suggestive of it. Apparently SQLite is Too Forbidden to even do that. TIL SQLite is Lord Voldemort.

Only the word and word co-occurrence probability data needed for the filter to run was stored and updated here on FSTDT in a secondary SQL Server database. (It still is, but hasn't been updated in a while and isn't currently being used.) This probability data is basically just how likely (or unlikely) certain words and co-occurrences of words are to occur in 'good' and 'bad' comments. These probabilities are the product of other statistical and meta-statistical analysis stored in the external SQLite database.

Getting the probability data used by the filter requires collecting statistics about a corpus of training data, the larger the corpus the better. Those statistics are stored so they can be subjected to statistical analysis of their own, and then those statistics are subject to further statistictaal analysis. That's two layers of meta-statistics. I originally decided against storing this latter data on the FSTDT server because I vastly overestimated the amount of space that would be required to store statistics about statistics pertaining to statistics of statistics about tens of thousands of words and the frequency they co-occur with other words. (How could you not??) Yo dawg, I heard you liked statistics, so I gave you some statistics collected from your statistics about your statistics...

We call this madness naive Bayesian filtering. To be a "non-naive" Bayesian filter, you must venture even further down this metastatistical rabbit hole.

TL;DR: Bayes Theorem is postmodern statistics.

Anyway, I think the corpus in the training database is a good representative crosscut of the actual FSTDT database. There's tons of cool, fascinating, and just plain weird stuff to gleam from it, like the fact that the fundie index of a post and the number of times the word 'when' appears in it appear to stand in direct correlation. Why?? Anyone wanna fathom a guess? Quotes also have way more hapax legomena (words that occur only once in a corpus) than comments do, but I don't find that nearly as interesting, because there are already a couple of very likely explanations. One, certain fundies absolutely love to invent "words" like abortuarydeathscortagandistism.* Two, a whooole lot of fundies just can't spell. Perhaps they try to hide that fact with word puree like homocommunofascofemininazis?**

[aside]*Protip: English is a mostly Isolating language, so we Anglophones generally prefer to create names for novel concepts by compounding existing words together into phrases instead of creating new words by adding prefixes and suffixes to other words or word roots. For example, to describe the practice of treating medical problems with things that actually exist in reality (as opposed to quackpot woo-woo), we coined the term evidence-based medicine instead of inventing a completely new word like vercomadhealancy (ver-com-ad-heal-anc(e)-cy, lit. "truth~reality | with~using | from~by | heal | having the quality of | the activity or state of"), no matter how much cooler and more phonoaesthetic vercomadhealancy sounds.

If that gloss is incoherent to you, read it backwards: "the activity or state of | having the quality of | heal(ing) | by | using | reality." In English, the order that a word's morphemes follow is generally a mirror image of the order that words usually follow in clauses and sentences. In linguistic parlance, English clauses and morphemes branch in opposite directions: clauses are head-initial (branch to the right of their head), while words head-final (branch to the left of their head). Oh, and only one morpheme of that word, heal, can stand alone, while all three of evidence-based medicine can. And that's your linguistics lesson of the day. And this is exactly why I love corpus statistics: it fuses my three favorite subjects: linguistics, mathematics, and in the modern age, computers.[/aside]

[aside]**True fact: I'm also a terrible speller, but I actually heed the little red underlines that tend to pop up a lot in the things I write.[/aside]

IceIceKitty #sexist reddit.com

Fuck I'm on mobile and my post deleted. Anyway, the difference is very important because it's the difference between who the movement is for and who it isn't for. Feminism is for females, the black panthers arenfor black people, and so on. If men are allowed to take any degree of control they will inevitably ruin it. If white people were leaders or organizers they would ruin black panthers too.

Seen so called feminist men freak out way too many times to give them any benefit of the doubt. Any activists knows the people who are being affected most have to be the people with the most voice and control. Allies are important to give support and visibility. Look at how straights are ruining LGBT by claiming queerness and kink and bdsm are part of the umbrella. LGBT isn't for gays anymore because straights ruined it.

many #fundie rr-bb.com

*eviticus International promises to help miserable straights become ex straights. Brother Richard of Leviticus, says anyone can become a happy well-adjusted gay or lesbian through the power of prayer and Jesus Christ.*

What???
Heterosexuality is the new sinful lifestyle???
Praying to Jesus to make you gay? Wow, that is definitely a new one. Many homosexuals used to pray to be straight!
Surely we must be near the Lord's return!
---
I am not sure how much more I can take of the Gay agenda. I might try to get a head start to see if I can meet the rapture half way.
---
I get so angry reading thees posts! It is frustrating watching your Lord and savior being trashed. I hurt for the people that are falling for lies, Satans and BO's. It seems so hopeless, and dark. I just need to focus on the light!! Yes the King of Kings and Lord of Lord's is coming!!! Hallelujah to the Lamb! I am so glad God is in control. I can't stand 10 minutes of all the heretical, self serving, world. Even so, Lord Your will be done. Give me strength, give me patience, renew me, set my heart ablaze. We can no longer be silent, You are uncontainable, Lord, give us the words to speak, and lead people to us because they want what we have, YOU.
---
I really, really, really don't want to be gay. I'd rather stay miserable and saved thank you very much.
---
That is just disgusting. Sometimes I wonder why we should even pray for people like that.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

Impervious: Not admitting of passage or capable of being affected.

Every soulwinning Christian knows the frustration of witnessing to people who have already decided they will never get saved. I was saddened recently, as I read of the impervious attitude of former president of the United States, Benjamin Franklin, who stated...

"He (the Rev. George Whitefield) used, indeed, sometimes to pray for my conversion, but never had the satisfaction of believing that his prayers were heard." -Franklin's Autobiography.

Tragically, Benjamin Franklin heard sermon after sermon by the mighty preacher, George Whitefield, and yet refused to believe upon Jesus Christ. How sad. So many people, like Benjamin Franklin, hear the Word of God preached over and over; BUT, their hearts are harder than concrete. If you haven't guessed it already, the photo to the right is a jackass, a donkey, which is an appropriate symbol of some people's stubbornness to obey the Word of God.

In Mark Chapter 6, the disciples had just witnessed Jesus feed well over 5,000 hungry people with just 5 loaves of bread, and 2 fishes. The Bible says in Mark 6:44 that the men alone numbered 5,000. Including the wives and children, there must have been over 15,000 people. We know for certain there were at least 5,000. Can you imagine, thousands of people being fed from just one little boy's lunch? What a miracle by a wonderful Savior! Yet, just a short time later in Mark 6:52, we read that the disciples feared, lacking faith ... BECAUSE THEIR HEART WAS HARDENED. Wow! And these were Jesus' disciples! I find it interesting that Jesus' own disciples doubted Him at times. This teaches us that even the best of Christians falter. This is true of every believer. We are all emotional creatures, prone to doubt and wander. This is why it's important that we learn to keep our eyes on Jesus, by living in His Word, which He has given to us.

However, it is an entirely different situation when a man refuses to believe upon Christ as his Savior. The disciples weren't impervious, they were simply immature in the Lord. Their hardened hearts were eventually melted away by the Word of God. To the contrary, Benjamin Franklin was impervious, unable to be reached with the Gospel. Proverb 29:1 states, "He, that being often reproved hardeneth his neck, shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy." A person only has so many breaths to this life, only so many heartbeats ... and then this earthly life is over forever. Kindly said, Benjamin Franklin was like a jackass, who stubbornly heard the Gospel preached again and again; BUT, HIS HEART WAS HARDENED. No amount of preaching was ever able to reach Benjamin Franklin, because of his impervious heart of unbelief.

Ghost #fundie ghost.report

LGBTQ Slippery Slope? Man Wants To Become Genderless Alien.

In a previous article in which I highlighted the organized LGBTQ movement’s ambition towards children, I asked the readers, ” What’s next?” It seems that people within the LGBTQ movement are moving the bounds of morality simply for vindictive shock value, or these people are suffering the side-effects of psychosis due to being infected with HIV/AIDS. Either way, the more disgustingly perverted the LGBTQ gets, the more support they lose from sympathetic supporters.

Just when you thought you’ve seen it all, the LGBTQ comes up with more disturbing ways to take its “movement.” Below is a video of a man who wants to become a “genderless alien.” Now remember, if you are repulsed or appalled by this person, then according to the LGBTQ movement, then you are a homophobic bigot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cffyclpEo2s

As you can see, this slippery slope continues on this downward fall towards the ridiculously perverted. If you listen at around 4:00, this genderless alien talks about wanting to adopt children. Now what is it about the LGBTQ movement and their infatuation with children? One can only assume, based on how they define their existence on how the like to have sex, the LGBTQ has a sexually nefarious motive for this children fetish.

Regardless how one justifies it, this LGBTQ slippery slope continues and will not stop. They got hate crime bills, new definition of marriage and the general acceptance of America; not even these special privileges (not equality) can pacify the perverted appetite of these people. So unless voices on the civilized side of the LGBTQ start denouncing these type of freaks from their community, their movement will take a giant step back. And when that happens, the majority of people are not going to care. For the evidence of LGBTQ’s past will speak for itself in the future.

Ghost

Prometheus #fundie answers.yahoo.com

[someone asked if there was any proof of a "firmament" having existed]

hold on a minute, this is not a ridiculous claim, and you should give your mother more credibility since she has more experience in life ! Things that you are taught in school and which you read in the popualr media are not always true. I know this to be a fact since I have done years of research in this and other fields.
\ First of all there is no "proof" one way or the other and none will ever be found. However there is a ton of evidence, as I will explain.
I have looked into this matter and researched. it There is strong evidence for example that there was a great flood of which the Bible speaks and which incidentally is recorded in many cultures around the world, not just the Bible. It seems very likely that the flood occurred as a result of a global catastrophic climate change . This was the end of the ice age about 12,500 years ago. Before this great flood the sky was different and no sun or Moon could be seen - just a massive cloud cover.
The great climate change occurred due to some great Earth changes whcih altered the currents of the oceans worldwide. The ocean currents also reciprocate by influencing th climate. The jets streams are also very important in climatology.
This climate change is thought that this was due perhaps to a global 'volcanic winter'; which was triggered by many volcanoes going off at once around the world. This is a very long and complex story and there are many factors to be considered. Remember that the Bible says in Genesis that "the world was barren and laid waste"... this is precisely what would occur in this scenario.
Read up on the Siberian flats or the Deccan Flats for exam,ple. The Siberian Flats is an area in Siberia as big as the continental USA which is covered with volcanoes . The depth of the lava over this entire region is abvout 5000 feet (one mile). There is much to learn about the ancient history of the Earth. and I cant include it all here.
There are even Western scientists who do believe that there was an atomic war on this planet long ago. The evidence can be seen in the rock layers. In fact this is commonly believed in the Hindu philosophy / religion.

Source(s):

research Bible, history, geology, paleontology, climatology, mythology, etc..

Vincent Reynouard #conspiracy codoh.com

[Extracted from the article "Persecution in France for "The Waffen-SS: Innocent at Oradour""]

On June 9, 2004, the appeal court in Limoges sentenced me to two years in prison (whereof 18 months on probation) and a fine of 3000 Euro for the crime of "approving a war crime." It also declared the confiscation of parts of my archive, which was seized in 2001, to be lawful. The reason for this sentence was my research into the SS "massacre" in the French village of Oradour 60 years ago.

It all began in 1989, when I spoke with a friend about the Waffen-SS and he told me that the official history of "the Oradour massacre" was being questioned by a number of people. At that point I still believed – as almost all French do – in the official historical version. I believed, that members of the Waffen-SS on June 10, 1944, had destroyed the village of Oradour and annihilated its inhabitants. I also believed that they had burned several hundreds of women and children alive in the local church.

In the case of Oradour we are not dealing with a few dozen dead, but with the cold-blooded murder of 642 people, whereof about 500 defenseless women, children, and infants. Faced with such a dire allegation and harboring doubts about it, it is completely reasonable if one visits the site of the crime in order to observe with one" s own eyes that which is held as fact.

I am not a historian. My background is that of a chemical engineer and a teacher of natural science. Therefore I have not studied Oradour with the approach normally taken. It is a fact that French writers when dealing with the Waffen-SS first explicate on the German theories of total war, then talk of "the crimes of the SS" in Russia, Czechoslovakia, and elsewhere; then follows the German occupation of France and the general activities of the Waffen-SS in their fight against the Resistance. The Oradour massacre is dealt with only after that. For these tendentious writers the guilt of the Waffen-SS is self-evident. This is why since 1947 the officially disseminated version is the only one to be heard.

[...]

The most likely conjecture is that a partisan ammunition depot was located in the church, and that on June 10 this depot exploded with tragic consequences. The reasons for this remained to be clarified. This theory of course contradicts the official version, which portrays Oradour as a peace loving village located in a region completely free of partisans. The advocates of the official theory do not want people to think consider seriously the factual causes behind the destruction of the church. Why would the Resistance not have used a large village by the side of the main transport routes for their purposes? After all, we know of several cases from France and Belgium in which church buildings were used by partisans as hiding places for large amounts of ammunition.

[...]

The French have always rebutted this German version with their claim of peaceful village. This is a poor attempt to portray themselves as innocent or at least to justify themselves. But let us assume for a moment, that the Waffen-SS really acted "by evil habit" as they are alleged to have done. If they had sought to terrorize and demoralize the population, the Waffen-SS would scarcely have looked for excuses. Rather they would have declared with demonical pride, that they were not to be made fools of. In this case there would have been not one Oradour, but ten, twenty, fifty.

[...]

The most probable scenario to me looks like this: While the Waffen-SS searched through the village, some partisans hid themselves in the church, where weapons and ammunition was hidden since previously. When the women and children were brought to the church, the hidden partisans were discovered. The German soldiers sought to capture them. It came to fisticuffs and finally shots were fired. These shots may have caused the ammunition to explode. Did all women and children inside the church die as a result of the catastrophe? This does not seem plausible, since parts of the church were not destroyed, and since there are objects made of wood and textile left intact. The people standing in the vicinity of these objects must thus also have survived the drama, and not only the already mentioned false witness Mrs. Rouffanche

Baron Max #fundie sciforums.com

Yeah, exactly. We can set aside fenced off areas for each and every weirdo group in the society ....the cocksuckers area, the breastfeeding area, the fuckers area, the pot smokers area, the heroin freaks area, the booze hound area, the murderers gathering place, the rapists groups, the pedophile group, ........., and any and all such groups ..we just set aside those areas and anyone who wants to do or see the fun can just join right in.

After all, a society should be forced to accept any and all people, with any and all weird and strange ideals and habits, right?