Similar posts

komentajaleska #fundie komentajaleksa.tumblr.com

danfreefall asked: Question, because I'm woefully ignorant and honestly curious. If a woman wants to do porn is that bad? I understand that the porn industry itself is very insidious but I'm curious about what if a female of sound mind wishes to do it?

I really hate this question because what it does is ask me to participate in some exercise of imaginative pondering about a purely hypothetical situation, a situation that does not exist and upon which it would be a massive waste of time to dwell. People don’t often ask anti-capitalists (who are also anti-porn) “Well, what if some people want to work in sweatshops?” or “What if some people want to work in this exploitative industry or that exploitative industry for minimum wage?” Whether a few individuals working for a capitalist industry are doing fairly well, enjoy what they’re doing, are free to go whenever they want, etc. is irrelevant to class-based analysis, which must be applied when assessing the social, economic, and political harms of something.

Listen–go to my pornography, anti porn, and/or porn actresses tags and what you will read about is an industry so violent, abusive, greedy, and life-destroying that it will hopefully make you question whether such an industry is worth being salvaged. The porn industry uses “consent contracts” to avoid being prosecuted, lies and misleads about what they will have the performers do and how much they will pay, and gives the performers drugs and alcohol to get through scenes. Coercive conditions make consent impossible.

What happens is something like this: A woman signs a consent contract before she does her first scene. She can, theoretically, make a “no list” of acts she won’t perform or performers she won’t work with, but in practice she is really signing away her right to pursue legal action against the company she’s working for should she be violated in some way. When she arrives on the porn set, she expects to do a standard man/woman scene because that’s what her agent told her. However, there are 5 men on the set when she gets there, and the director tells her she has to have sex with all 5 men or she is not getting paid. She is also expected to do anal, and reminded that she signed a contract. She doesn’t feel like she can refuse, and most of all, she needs the money, so she does the scene.

This is rape, plain and simple.

Amateur, alternative, and """feminist""" porn companies all have the same problems as the mainstream companies. They are all driven by profit, the content they produce is often just as violent/hardcore because they have to compete with male supremacist, male-dominated markets, and the directors and producers do not care about the women who work for them.

You cannot buy enthusiastic consent. Even if you want to propose the best conditions, where the performers are treated well, paid well, not pressured to do anything they don’t want to do–conditions that absolutely no porn company on earth adheres to–the notion that women’s bodies and sexuality should be something men can buy, that it is acceptable to obtain a woman’s sexual consent that you would not get from her if you were on equal financial footing, is profoundly misogynistic and unethical.

This post sums up the problem with consent being something you can purchase:

on an economic level, if you pay women to have sex, there will be women who have sex not cos they want to but cos they need money. i don’t care if however many percent are supposedly economically stable women there by choice, if there is just one woman who isn’t then that is too many

on a social level, if you commodify sex, the resulting demands of the consumer will create standards based on what they want, and in a patriarchy those who make the demands are men, and so men control the sexual culture and women become and remain secondary participants

The sex industry cannot exist without rape, abuse, and human trafficking. There are simply not enough women who enter the sex industry “willingly” (as I’ve already highlighted that economic coercion is not consent, I use the word “willingly” loosely) to meet the demand that exists from male consumers, so pimps and traffickers find vulnerable women and children to help supply the demand.

Consider, for example, the case from a few months ago of Western porn sites buying videos of the rapes and sexual tortures committed against 280 Pakistani children. It’s easy for someone who knows absolutely nothing about the porn industry to dismiss this as a one-time occurrence of something really bad happening, but as a matter of fact, men upload filmed rapes and sexual abuse onto porn sites all the time. (See: revenge porn.) Since the rapes of trafficked women and children are sold to porn companies and the scenes that go on in “professional” porn studios are coerced and forced, there is no way around this fact: Porn is rape.

Caamib #sexist blogger.com

bold is mine


Gally, I will reply to you though my goal isn't so much for you to read it, as you're a delusional idiot, but to make an intelligent reader, somebody who really wants to learn about this stuff, see why you're wrong and misrepresenting a lot of what we believe.

"Being anti-masturbation and anti-porn has NOTHING to do with fighting against feminist anti-male sex laws. "

Jesus, what idiocy ! Of course they don't have nothing to do with it. You're right. You know what it has to do with? Actual improvement in male lives. Making it easier for healthy, reasonable males to get women. Which masturbation actively impedes by making them less motivated to do so. But the fuck would you know about any of that?

That's basically the reply to that entire paragraph of utter bs. Let's go on...


"You're validating their whole enterprise. The whole feminist movement has been a response to the ever greater range of sexual alternatives for men to the average woman on the street (and women are getting more and more average by the day, at least in the West). "

You have no idea why and how feminism comes about. Today's males have far less sexual choices than those in 1970s, when there was less feminism. Another thing that's a waste of time to discuss with you.


"How the hell can you seriously rage against feminist anti-porn laws when you agree with the feminist junk science basis for them?"

Which "junk science" are you rambling about? Feminists were never against masturbation, in fact they deem it to be an acceptable "solution" as their idea of a nightmare is whites having any kind of sex. But this is also something you're too stupid to get.

"You also completely fail to see what's going to be happening in the next few decades."

No, in fact you do. Your idea of robots replacing women in that women will not happen. And I'll tell you why. There's several reasons. First of all, the technology won't develop. In late 1998 people believed they'd have robots as servants and various other stuff by 2018. We don't. We have been stagnating technologically since around 2000 and your fantasies simply won't happen. Chances are that technology will decline, not improve with times.
Other issue is that there's still a lot of shame connected to using such technology.

But there's one reason that is much more crucial - men and women still want to be with each other. I still meet women 13-40 with my online ads, because modern Western women, as messed up as they are, still are looking for somebody to control them and own the shit of them, to put them in their place. You won't replace this and the male need to do so with any robots and virtual reality.

And there's a more important reason as well- why would we want to do so? Can you marry a robot, have a child with a robot? No? So what is the point, anyway? Why live in a virtual reality and knowing you'll never procreate? You think men like fschmidt, Nathan or myself would have kids if we did so? Why don't you just take drugs or kill yourself if you don't want to live in the real world?

"This is the last thing men need in the face of the tsunami of anti-porn based feminist sex puritan laws."

No. This would be a blessing, which he understands full well as he's not as dumb as you are. It would make thousands of men get off their asses and take women.

"'I'd go as far to say as you're as much of an enemy to men as feminists are at this stage"

No, he's just not a delusional idiot like you.

"And given all the work you've done for the last couple of decades, includes bravely standing up to the Norwegian State, that's a real tragedy."

Standing up to delusional idiots like yourself, who pretend to be their friends (unlike the less perverse Norwegian state) is also quite brave. As I told you, he's just not a delusional idiot like you.

"yet if you can point to one single pro cannabis legalization activist (let alone 'the leader') who actually promotes the idea that smoking cannabis is harmful and should be avoided, then I'll apologize to you and become a 'Male Sexualist'."

No. Another thing you get completely wrong. An actual comparison would be "find me a cannabis legalization activist who actively promotes harmful chemical alternatives to pot that are known to destroy people's lives". And that is what masturbation is - a shade of actual sexuality, nothing. A dangerous tool that makes you complacent and unlikely to seek out actual sex. If you think being a male sexualist is about helping males jerk themselves off in dark rooms... Well, I'll just say that getting rid of that would be the first step to not being an idiot.

"We're struggling to get more than a dozen followers out of the 3 billion men on the planet affected by feminist sex laws"

But feminist sex laws would collapse quickly if men stopped jerking off. Because, guess what? You are not a hebephile. There's no such thing. All sane men would sleep with 12 year-old girls and younger. And they'll be much more motivated to so when they don't jack off. When millions do it regularly, and they will when boys are discouraged from masturbating, it will be easy.

"Islamic minded anti-masturbation incels who crave spending their lives with a HB4 just when AI sex robots and virtual reality sex are becoming real??"

No, no, no, no.... Just no.

Everything wrong and stupid. The problem with the term incels is lookism and cultism, which didn't exist when I was in charge more, as I explained in my June article. This is directly connected to their takeover of the term after July 2016, Also, you miss the real point. Incels aren't meant to be popular or liked, of course feminists will hate them. The point is to promote actual solutions, which don't have to do with looks but are extremely contrary to feminism (finding non-feminist wives, rape etc). When men who call themselves incel seek actual solutions then the term will be seen more seriously. The idea that you will get a political solution in Western countries is pure idiocy. I just want to help men improve their everyday's lives. Politics is a waste of time and these countries like Norway will collapse like all countries which adopted their policies did.

It's your stupidity and idiocy and listening to mainstream media that you believe incel is some political term or whatever. It isn't. You're a fucking incel.

My goal is simply to improve the lives of men, not some great political solutions you dream of.

I already addressed the robot thing. Your assumptions about the state of technology and human nature are wrong.

If I chose robots instead of women I'd never have a daughter now, for example. Or several girlfriends or willing sexual partners, not to mention less willing ones.

Also, I'd like to address some of the shit you said before, some of which I painstakingly translated..

-Eivind's ideas on women being the owners of sex don't mean that men can't reject sex. They just mean women forcing it on them should be very lightly punishable. If I don't want chocolate that moment and somebody force feeds me some delicious chocolate am I some great victim? That's nonsense ! And Eivind did say that in cases of harsher violence these women should be charged with assault. But for giving somebody chocolate, which is how men see women's sexuality? Of course not. Another thing you'd know if you weren't a brainwashed house negro.

- No, male fetuses masturbating in wombs aren't a problem. Males usually develop first serious interest at women at around 12-14. Besides, their penises are usually too small to be properly masturbated before around 10-11-12, so they masturbate them the way clitorises are played with before that age (at least that is my experience). So such males don't develop penile sensitivity and can be successfully directed to have sex with rl girls of similar age of slightly younger/older. See how stupid and clueless you are?

Also, remember just one thing, Gally. Sperm doesn't ask. It doesn't ask if you're worthy enough, if you achieved this or that, if you have this or that level of consent or respect. It just impregnates. Think about that. So impregnate somebody. Do your role in the world.

I was attacked for saying I should have killed 12 year-old girls with C4 and burning rubber tires around their necks, but guess what? THIS IS WHAT MODERN WESTERN WOMEN WANT. What they don't want is anybody of IQ above that of a goldfish and any respect. This went down the drain from the first moment they got basic "rights" like suffrage, which are nothing but privileges that enable the destruction of society.

Oh, and another thing. Regarding islamic minded incels, you're completely wrong, as usual. Those in such communities who are most islamic minded, like myself or fschmidt, aren't even incel anymnore. Most actual incels, at least by my definition, are lookist fools who know nothing about history or wqmen's nature, want to have consensual sex (and nothing else) with dirty Western sluts who get raped regularly anyway and don' give a fuck about it, and then they're are angry when this fails.

Anonymous Coward #fundie godlikeproductions.com

WATCHING PORN IS DANGEROUS it is Witchcraft you are performing SEX MAGICK with Demons

Pornography is Witchcraft

In our current world pornography is used by witches and sorcerers to bind souls to the kingdom of darkness; hence, pornography is witchcraft and sorcery.

Of course not all involved in the porn industry production are witches and sorcerers, some humans do it because it gives them joy and easy money. Not every female model in porn is a witch, though there are many witches there, rather a big percentage do it for money and as a way for income. Whores, who sell the use of their bodies for money, are also a big part of the female porn models specially by doing porn they earn a lot more money than from prostituting themselves to individuals.

Often a witch female when she does porn (besides doing a service to her master Satan, the evil one) she is after fans to admire her and she is after gathering followers since she considers those hooked to her as belonging to her, their souls, their spirits belonging to her.

Obviously, she writes, there is a spiritual force that the Bible is warning us about. It causes us to take leave of our senses. Witchcraft releases strong confusion against our minds so that Jesus is not the clear focus of our lives. Once that happens, we are more vulnerable to the vain imaginations the enemy whispers to our souls. We have a responsibility to know about this spiritual wickedness and guard ourselves against it. With that said, she writes, here are eight signs you are under a witchcraft attack:

1. Confusion
2. Trouble paying attention
3. Wanting to hide in your cave [she means cocoon yourself]
4. Forgetting who you really are
5. Discouraged, depressed and ready to quit
6. [Feeling of being] Angry and frustrated
7. Sickness, aches and pains
8. Just plain worn out.

Anti-Feminism Australia #fundie antifeminismaustralia.com

Make Australia great again – Pauline Hanson for PM!

Feminists are scared, very scared. They know their days are numbered and a big change is coming. Trump winning the US presidential election has shown that people have had enough. They have had enough of political correctness and feminism that plagues the USA.

Feminists have brought this upon themselves by pushing their female supremacist movement too far. Did they really expect it would last forever? Over the past few years, there has been a growing backlash against feminism. Read the comments (if they haven’t yet been disabled) of any man bashing news article in Australia and it will be full of backlash. Ten years ago you’d be lucky to see one or two comments against feminism. Today you will see hundreds, and they make up the majority of the comments.

Perhaps the most important thing of all is the rise of women against feminism. In the US election, a whopping 53% of white women voted for Trump. This came as a huge shock to feminists, and they didn’t realise just how many women are now against feminism. In the Anti-Feminism Australia group at least half of our admins are now women. We have many female members in the group and have also noticed a huge increase in the number of women joining our movement. There are also Facebook groups such as “women against feminism” which has over 42,000 members.

Feminists know the game is over when women are “betraying the sisterhood” in droves. This makes them angrier than anything else. An anti-feminist woman is probably equivalent to 5 anti-feminist men in terms of damage to the feminist movement. If feminists can’t even get their fellow sisters on their side anymore, what hope do they have?

So getting back to the victory of Trump. How does this affect feminism in Australia? Because the people of Australia have now seen that if Trump can become president of the USA, then surely Australia can have a Trump like president as well. Australians are sick of politicians who pander to the needs of women just to win female votes.

Australia needs an anti-feminist, MRA, straight talker Prime Minister to clean up all the misandry in this country. Who is the best person for the job? I would personally say Mark Latham but since he is no longer in politics, our best chance is now Pauline Hanson. Pauline Hanson’s popularity has surged since the last Australian election, and continues to grow. This puts her in the best position to become Prime Minister of Australia in the next election. You may laugh now but I can assure you if the victory of Trump is possible, we could easily see Pauline Hanson as the next Prime Minister of Australia.

In this video, Pauline Hanson congratulates Trump and says she is thrilled with his victory.

Pauline Hanson congratulates Trump

Last night on the ABC show Q&A, one feminist in the audience asked the panel if Pauline Hanson is likely to ever become PM. The audience burst out in laughter, and feminists on the panel respond with a firm “no”. Laugh it up now feminists, because that’s exactly what people did with the idea of a Trump president. I can’t wait to see all those feminist tears once Pauline Hanson becomes PM.

Feminist asks if Pauline Hanson will ever be PM

Although Pauline has never stated it, she is clearly an anti-feminist and a Men’s Rights Activist. She has liked a few of my anti-feminist comments that I’ve left on her page using the page name of “Anti-Feminism Australia”. She has also promised that she will make child custody laws fairer on men, address the male suicide epidemic, and help male victims of domestic violence.

Pauline Hanson claims women make frivolous DV complaints

Feminists have shown they are desperate for a female President/Prime Minister, just because they have a vagina. So you can just imagine the mental gymnastics and conflict going on inside their head if Pauline Hanson were PM. On one hand they want a female PM, but on the other hand they hate the fact she is an anti-feminist and MRA.

In my opinion, having a female anti-feminist PM is probably even better than having a male anti-feminist one. Why? Because women against feminism can get away with a whole lot more and can’t be accused of being a “misogynist” or a “woman hater”. Feminists will have a strong urge to call Hanson a “misogynistic pig”, but realise they can’t because she’s a woman. So what will they do? Blame it on the patriarchy or “internalised misogyny” so they can still find a way to blame men.

Be afraid feminists, be very afraid. Your days are numbered.

Please support “Pauline Hanson for PM” Facebook page.

MAKE AUSTRALIA GREAT AGAIN! PAULINE HANSON FOR PM!

gynarchyverse #transphobia #sexist #psycho deviantart.com

This is going to be a difficult issue to talk about, as any issue regarding gender is. But to quote Kurzgesagt, "Not talking about an issue will not help solve it".

I want to preface that in no way shape or form am I prejudiced against transgendered persons. They have a right to do what they want with their bodies/minds. I'm not arguing against that. But navigating the topic of transgenderism within the scope of Female Supremacy can be tricky. As I've learned in recent weeks, when member on here who once identified as a Female Supremacist (and was active in our community) came out as transgendered last month.

So I think now is a good time have a discussion about this.

I don't think anyone who supports Female Supremacy can deny that this philosophy is founded on very strict roles based on a person's sex.

Like it or not, it's the truth. It's right there in the name: FEMALE Supremacy. That means that Women rule and men serve. We cannot deny what science has proven: A Woman is a human being with two X chromosomes, and a man is a human being with one X chromosome and one imperfect Y chromosome, making males essentially an incomplete Female.

That is the core concept of Female Supremacy, that males are an evolutionary abnormality that spun-off from the default blueprint of life, which is Female. And as abnormalities, we must devote ourselves to empowering, serving, and worshiping our progenitors. For without Them we would not exist.

So given these very clear roles we have for men and Women, what are we to say when a male desires to become Female?

Those who identify as transgendered can change certain aspects about themselves to match the gender they identify with; namely hormonal therapy & surgery. But they cannot change their genotype. That is to say, they cannot change their chromosomes. A person who is born biologically male can never have a perfect XX chromosome, no matter how badly he wishes so. Similarly, a Woman cannot deny Her perfect XX chromosome for some reason she wished to become a male.

Your chromosomal pair your Goddess-given role in life, and you cannot change it once you have it. If You are blessed to have an XX chromosome, that means there is no limit to what You can do in life. You can use males as you see fit. You can tell males what to do and they have to obey You. You are the closet thing to Goddess on Earth.

And if you have an XY chromosome, then you get bask in the presence of Sacred Femininity. You get the honor of bringing amusement, happiness, and comfort to Women. And through submission to Goddess, you'll find spiritual enlightenment.

Now, onto to the fake Female Supremacist (whose name will not be mentioned) who's featured in the screen-capped conversation in the above picture.

You say you plan on "changing [your chromosome] for [yourself] someday". I ask you. How are you going to do that? How are you going to defy the laws of science and give yourself that perfect XX chromosome? I'm sorry, but you're not. If have an ounce of scientific knowledge on this subject, you know you're not. Truth be told, you made a fool of yourself in that conversation with earthculture. I don't know about him, but I cringed when reading your comment.

Secondly, when you announced to your followers that who were coming out as transgendered, you told me that you don't support Female Supremacy and you implied those in this community were fanatics. I have several messages from you that prove you are (or at least were) a very staunch supporter of Female Supremacy. So please don't lie about your pre-transgender leanings when I and several others know the truth.

And thirdly, in one of your recent posts you talked about me and the caption I made using your old avatar that you claimed was taken down by the site staff.

NEWSFLASH! I took that picture down! Why? Because you changed your avatar to the transgender flag, so my caption no longer made sense. No one would've known it was reference to you. That's the only reason I took it down. It wasn't because I felt bad for making it. I still think you're still fake Female Supremacist and a liar. And let me clarify, you being transgendered has nothing to do with my gripe against you, it's the fact that you stabbed me and everyone else in this community in the back. You owe us (especially me) an apology. Then I urge you to seek a licensed psychologist, preferably one who majors in LGBTQ+ issues and is a Female Supremacist, so they can give you the help you obviously need.

RANT OVER.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad #conspiracy twitter.com

image
image


In the name of God
The Most Merciful, The Most Compassionate
To: His Excellency, Mr. António Guterres
The secretary-general of the United Nations
Again Greetings and best regards, and fresh wishes for your success in fulfilling
the heavy responsibilities in that organization
You are informed that the use of biologic means, including the recent and wide-
scale release of coronavirus (COVID-19) as a new weapon for establishing and/or
maintaining political and economic upper hand in the global arena, by some
domineering powers, has caused worries among the public in nations, and further
distortion in the security of the world people.
Feeling responsible vis-à-vis the spread and depth of the unprecedented material
and intangible damages caused by this imposed war and invasion against
humanity, made me present the statement of the problem:
Nowadays, it is clear to the world people that the mutated and intelligent
coronavirus 2019, was produced in laboratories, and more clearly put, by the
warfare stock houses of biologic war belonging to world hegemonic powers, and is
much more anti-human„ destructive and horrible than the other anti-human
weapons such as the nuclear and chemical ones, as well as Harp.
As the Secretary-General of the United Nations, you are expected to:
Strongly slam the anti-human action by world criminal powers in imposing
the biologic war on nations, aimed at domineering, and don't allow the
perpetrators of such crimes realize their political-economic crimes and evil
plans and avert justice and penalty through the United Nations, by white
washing their crimes.
With special scrutiny, identify the elements involved in the production and
use of biologic weapons, and strictly penalize them at worldwide scale.
Indifference and lack of serious and effective confrontation with them, can
ruin the relations among countries and nations, and threaten seriously the
existence of nations.
A plan to modify and reinforce the convention on the ban on production and
use of biologic weapons, aimed at prohibiting any form of research, and
establishing laboratories for production, stockpiling and use of any form of
biologic weapons at any scale of effect, be drafted and submitted to the UN General Assembly. The foreseeing of executive measures for effective/strict
supervision and control, and penalizing any move in that direction, via the
transparent and responsible participation of all governments and nations,
needs to be on top of the agenda.
The World Health Organization (WTO) needs to be obliged to strictly
identify the above-said laboratories, as well as the elements involved in the
use of viruses such as Corona, and introduce thetn to the world community.
Nowadays, with the rising awareness among nations, and the increasing desire for
unity and cooperation for achieving freedom, justice, dignity, welfare, progress and
prosperity, the dominance of Devilish/anti-human powers has been isolated and for
sure, their reliance on mass killing weapons and their perpetration of anti-human
crimes, not only doesn't open up the way for their escape, but also speeds up the
end to their massive oppression.
I hereby assure everyone that in near future, and with the joining together of
the rivers of nations, and with the advent of The Perfect Human, who is the
humans' friend, guide and loving one, the true power of nations will emerge,
and hegemony will be uprooted, and the glorious day of the birth and
complete establishment of humanity, and the era of the grand manifestation
of God's grandeur, and characteristics, names and humanity will start.
I pray to God the Almighty, for your prosperity, and that of all free-thinkers
and those who subscribe to the dignity, security and excellence of the human
society.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Former President of the Islamic Republic of Iran

justforlulzandkeks #transphobia #conspiracy reddit.com

Re: JUST. FUCKING. LOL.

image

Ehhh depends on how passable they are, unfortunately I'd say 95% mtf aren't passable which means no qt trap waifu for us.

I sort of agree with you actually. If you find one that passes well attractive, that's not gay. Your brain is perceiving feminine features and reacting to them. But if you want to have sex with someone who has a dick, that's gay.

But either way all of them would reject us, so yeah it never began tbh fam.

you can be attracted to female secondary sex characteristics, but knowingly dating a man, with a dick (or a neo""""vagina"""") is indeed very gay. not to mention most (mtf) trannies don't pass at all

In the past, like, 3 yrs or so the left has seemed to bend over backwards to appease a population of people so small it shouldnt matter. LA has quite a bit of transpeople, and this isnt politically correct, but most of them are def mentally ill in some capacity. Now they're spouting parodies of incel talking points but without a hint of irony

there's a lot of money to be made on trannies. it's the medical industry's delve into transhumanism

https://thefederalist.com/2018/02/20/rich-white-men-institutionalizing-transgender-ideology/

It’s seems very unlikely the natural rate of transgenderism—if there really is an organic component to it—is nearly as high as the rates we’re seeing now.

it isn't. it's just being pushed heavily because there's money to be made from the psychiatric appointments, medications and surgeries. the virtue signaling leftists eat it up because they think it's progressive, meanwhile the medical industry rubs its hands

https://thefederalist.com/2018/02/20/rich-white-men-institutionalizing-transgender-ideology/

as always, it's about the money, and as always, just follow the money

Sometimes I think that the radical feminist "TERFS" are just the logically consistent and coherent feminists.

they are literally and unironically right. the whole tranny ideology is self contradicting and logically inconsistent. gendercritical ideology deconstructs it. of course as actual women they get shit on for saying mentally ill men/fetishists in dresses aren't and can't be women, which is incredibly ironic. though it doesn't help their image that they absolutely hate men. they're also anti porn and prostitution, which are also big memes being pushed by libfems, so naturally they are hated by the mainstream """"feminists""""

Mabel #racist #crackpot twitter.com

2060, white women, naturally endowed with the perfect balance of billowing bossoms, curvy hips, brimming w/ femininity, will now undergo asiafication surgery at coming of age bc white men, now all intimidated by the adult female body due to androgen loss & porn social engineering

I have no dog in this fight bc I'm in good shape and tinier. but if you like pic A over pic B, you are in fact, socially engineered or slightly homosexual.
image
image

closetedxxcishet #sexist reddit.com

Common Trans Paradoxes:

Trans women: PUNCH TERFS! KILL TERFS! STAB TERFS!
Also Trans women: We totally won't attack you in female spaces or anything.

Trans women: WE ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN CIS WOMEN!
Also Trans women: WE ARE THE MOOOOOOST HARASSED AND RAPED AND MARGINALIZED PEOPLE EVER! CIS PRIVILEGE IS REAL!

Trans women: We aren't erasing women!
Also Trans women: Vulva cupcakes kill!

Trans women: We aren't harassing or erasing lesbians!
Also trans women: FUCK ME OR YOU'RE A BIGOT AND I'LL RUIN YOUR LIFE!

Trans women: We aren't just men in dresses or women in suits!
Also trans women: THIS HISTORICAL CROSS DRESSER WAS TRANS!

Trans women: Vaginas aren't female! Penises aren't male! It's not all about genitals!
Also trans women: Pleasepleasepleaseplease contribute to our GoFundMe so we can change our genitals or else we'll kill ourselves.

Trans women: It's not all about passing!
Also trans women: Pleasepleasepleaseplease contribute to our GoFundMe so we can pass or else we'll kill ourselves.

Trans women: It's not about genitals!
Also trans woman: That drag queen can't perform here because he doesn't have the right genitals!

I'm sure you folks can come up with plenty of other examples....I'm just so tired of this crap.

Some TERFs #sexist reddit.com

Re: Where Does Organized Male Evil Come From?

I just got finished reading this article about the rapes of Rohingya women and the persecution and slaughter of their people: http://www.thejournal.ie/rohingya-rape-3745266-Dec2017/

I know it's not uplifting to read this stuff, but it's also important not to turn away.

I want to know what causes such organized male evil. It doesn't matter whether it's a dispute over territory or religion or ethnicity, it is men who do this in an organized fashion. It has always been men.

Is it as simple as "patriarchy?" Silvia Federici's Caliban and the Witch describes the creation of capitalist evil through the weaponization of men and male sexuality, the formal institution of patriarchy, the enslavement of women, and the colonial/imperial ventures of the new world order.

Although it's true almost no corner of the human world has gone untouched by the Western project of colonialism and imperialism, other cultures have their own ancient histories of warfare, bloodshed and male rule that predate Western history.

I know the advent of agriculture and the dawn of land ownership have been cited as the reason for growing institutionalization of patriarchy and subjugation of women and expansion of territory--but really--I struggle to understand how men can commit such horrific atrocities in an organized fashion. If women ruled the world, would we do this? Would we?

I have never given much credence to notions of biological determinism and I still don't; if men are like this by dint of nature as well as nurture the power of human socialization can change them. So far is has mainly been used to cement these violent, hierarchical tendencies it seems.

I just never used to believe there could be this fundamental difference between men and women where under the right circumstances men could join together to commit such atrocities in a way that women wouldn't. Is it because women have been stripped of their power that we don't see them band together to exercise it in such horrific fashion? Or is there really a fundamental, biological difference between us that makes men more susceptible to committing violence?

I also struggle with the connection between sex and committing violence so often seen within cultures and among mostly male individuals across the world. Is it male or is it masculine?

(anxietyaccount8)
No it's not just as simple as patriarchy. I once believed that but now I don't. Men really are just more violent than women. Male sexuality is also very different than female sexuality (in general) and I don't think anybody could have socialized me into being interested in some of the crazy things they are interested in.

I think that the reason a lot of people dismiss these claims is because they are reminded of evolutionary psychology, which for the most part is not very scientific at all. But the thing is that just because things like "women are naturally better at cooking" are BS it doesn't mean that everything that sounds like evopsych is wrong. For example we know that male and female animals act differently. We know that males and females have different body types, hormone levels, and different ways of reproducing. Would it really be so insane to suggest there are mental differences too?

Now to be fair, I am not really sure if this is true, and none of us will be sure unless we have substantial evidence, but this is my personal theory. It just feels really obvious to me.

(Unabashed_Calabash)
This was my point to another poster. To what extent can the behavior of other mammals, including our closest relatives chimpanzees and bonobos (pygmy chimpanzees) be interpreted to reflect on our own?

Not only the male correlation of sex and violence but specifically the far greater incidence of male sexual fetishes (about the same as the disproportionate ratio of male vs. female violence, 10 to 1) causes me to believe there's something more than socialization going on here. Scientists who study human sexuality say it has to do with a more intense focus from males as a group on sexuality in general, heightening fetishes. But how often do you hear of women who like to pretend to be baby boys and wear diapers? (Seriously?) And like to be burped and breastfed and rocked to sleep? (I would really like formal studies of how often these bizarre fetishes occur in males as compared to females. I wouldn't necessarily say it's a result of porn and therefore male domination arising from social reasons because how much of porn is men pretending to be infant girls and breastfeed? Please don't tell me).

I am not saying this to be in favor of gender or against it. "Gender" as we know it is a social construct. Any innate evolutionary differences in the sexes--say, of violent vs. pacifist, or systematizing (from, say, hunting more often than women in most prehistoric societies) vs. integration (from the greater social relations of gathering and building)--need not be our fate if detrimental. We are highly social animals almost entirely at the whim of our socialization, which has been civilizing in some respects but in others greatly lacking.

I agree that just because evolutionary psychology has become a crutch of sexist males it does not mean absolutely none of it is true. It's more important than ever we separate the wheat from the chaff.

(anxietyaccount8)
Right, and it's important that people recognize radical feminism's criticism of gender actually does not contradict this existence of innate differences. We are all born into a society where we have to follow prescribed gender roles, and this social construct bleeds into all aspects of our lives and causes differences of its own. If some differences are innate this social construction makes them much more prominent and worse.

Also it doesn't mean that there is a distinct male or female brain, or that trans people really do have the brain of the opposite sex. Even if, hypothetically, a trans woman did actually act in ways that women are biologically supposed to, they are just proving that there is variation and a male can be that way too.

(Unabashed_Calabash)
Lol at the downvotes. I also don't understand how butthurt men get about this subject. It is quite clearly true (unless you prefer "violence" to "evil" because you don't believe in imposing moral values on human actions), and I am merely asking why and where it comes from.

Humanity will never change until men reckon with their own and their fellow men's actions.

(bigoltreehugger)
Ew. So many men came in caping for other men in response. I miss the days when this sub didn't have as many dudes hanging around. I'm sorry I can't engage your question properly but I just wanted to say that I've always appreciated your input on this sub.

(descending_wisdom)
fundamental biological differences. Sexual selection theory easily explains male violence. Watch some videos on organized warfare in some troops of chimpanzees.

(sunscreenonface)
Gonna leave this write up from notcisjustwoman here:

"Patriarchy pre-dates both the agricultural revolution and hunter-gatherer societies, because the basis of the oppression of women, indeed the very basis for oppression itself, is rape.

Male animals have been raping female animals since before the first humans, or even the first primates, appeared on earth. Events like the agricultural revolution codified male oppression of women into a more organized system, and religion has evolved over time to become an enforcer and moralizer of male violence, but neither of things things created patriarchy. Patriarchy began the first time a man raped a woman, and instead of being beaten to death by her tribal/family group, he was rewarded with fathership of her children.

It’s not comfortable even for most radical feminists to see this full and complete scope of the history of patriarchy, because it means that things are much more complicated than mere socialization, but it is a brutal truth we must confront in our analysis."

To expand upon this, here's a previous write up I did once I'd read notcisjustwoman's blog:

"I don't think this will make anyone feel better, but I've recently been thinking a lot about the various species of animals across this earth that have been known to rape...and it turns out most animal species have some form of rape. Ducks, squirrels, dolphins, dogs, gorillas, etc. all have observable males who rape and aggress females.

I don't think it's a stretch to say that aggressive males who rape will pass on their aggressive traits to their offspring that are conceived via rape. I don't think it's a stretch to say that male homo sapiens might be more likely to aggress and rape females since they inherited a tendancy towards violence from their male ancestors who were conceived via rape. (Reminder: I could be completely wrong about this!)

Does this make rape ok? NO!!!! Even if rape and aggressive sexual behavior is 'natural', 'natural' does not instantly equal something good or beneficial for a species. Homo sapiens dying of tooth decay at 22 is quite natural, but it's horrific and traumatizing for everyone involved.

All I'm saying is my understanding of men's GLOBAL and CONSTANT violence toward women became easier to understand once I started to think about sexual violence as an issue often found in primate species and not as something completely 100% culturally-bound.

Here's a link to a tumblr write-up that spawned my thoughts on this: http://notcisjustwoman.tumblr.com/post/175761393959/what-is-good-for-the-gander-is-not-always-good-for#notes

(Unabashed_Calabash)
I've read about the extremely complex history of rape among animals of all kinds (they have highly evolved methods of rape--an actual sexual arms race between males and females, as females also evolved to try to avoid rape--in fact, some believe the reason we walk upright is because women first stood up to avoid greater vulnerability to gang rape from behind, and that these gang rapes were so violent many of the females of our prehistoric ancestors who did not stand up did not survive). The species in which pair-bonding and good fatherhood are the norm are not the norm.

There's a reason that male sperm in all species is a complex chemical cocktail. In humans it's designed to lull/drug the mate and bond females to males even at their own expense.

My gut feeling and experiences tell me notjustciswoman is right.

There's a reason rape as committed by men is so normalized and also so easy for men to commit. Behavioral scientists have discussed the not-so-mythical "rape switch" and posited that all or most men have one.

Reading stories of men's mass raiding/raping parties, I'm inclined to agree. (My own experience aligns with this as well. I have actually witnessed a man struggle with his own desire to rape when confronted with a woman highly vulnerable to it. He had a low "rape threshold" certainly, but I don't actually think it's all that unusual. I think human men--because human beings can feel remorse and regret--may struggle with what they have done or the harm they have caused, if society or the victim force them to reflect on this, but they still did it and wanted to do it anyway). Neither the normalization of rape nor its prevalence despite official messages all over the world that it's wrong would be so common if rape were not somehow natural to the males of this species.

I remember an author saying "we cannot deal with violence until we admit uncomfortable truths, such as the thrill of war." The same is true of rape/sexual abuse; there's no way we can combat it without understanding it, and understanding why some men like to do it even when it's officially discouraged, or why men as a class can be easily encouraged to commit it under the right circumstances, is, I think, important if we ever hope to combat it.

(And yes, the history of conquest and invasion in our species is the history of rape. There's a reason so many men in the world carry the same Y chromosome).

universallyabhorred #sexist incelocalypse.ru

Here is my vision of the ideal society for an incel. In this glorious world, females are strictly controlled they have no rights, educating them is banned and they are utilized to cook clean and provide pleasure as necessary. The government takes on an active role in regulating degenerate sexuality, in order to redress historical wrongs a system similar to affirmative action is devised for ugly incel males. The government gives ugly incels cushy high paying jobs in a variety of different administrative departments, which involves managing and controlling the people, all of these agents will work for at least 1 month at the department for the promotion of purity and will have 24/7 access to its female reserves.

What the department does is it regulates sexuality, censors porn, along with stones both adulterers and those who display lustful affections in public, which will be monitored by surveillance. How it regulates sexuality is by ensuring all females are made to wear chastity belts 24/7 from the age of 5, random inspections are done to ensure compliance, also neither the female nor her family would be able to remove the belt easily since the key would be held by the department. Females are also required to wear a shock collar from birth to which both the male members of the family and the government has control over to ensure its submissiveness.

Once a marriage has been arranged to a female it can get its belt removed by obtaining a marriage permit and then a sexual permit. For this the female will need to visit a department office branch accompanied by a male, wait for their turn then be interrogated for legalizing their marriage. Once they have received their marriage permit, the female is escorted to a room where the inspector removes the belt. He then takes both the female's anal and vaginal virginities if the female resists it will be shot beaten or shocked and denied the sexual permit. If the female is in the top 20% of attractiveness, the female will be knocked out and transported to the department's female reserves, and be denied the permit. Otherwise it will simply be returned to the male with a sexual permit.

Under this system ugly males have complete access to the female reserves consequently they gain pleasure from the hottest females, finally the lives of ugly males will be worthwhile we will be given the sexual rights we deserve.

Normie and attractive males also get submissive compliant females that cannot divorce rape their male masters. They may also take multiple wives which are not held in the female reserves. This program will be extremely effective if females are bred in high numbers in relation to males at a ratio similar to 10:1, so every normie or chad male can get multiple females and dispose of their wives freely once aged and hideous, while at the same time ugly incels are able to secure a portion of females in the reserves for their permanent pleasure.

theywarnedyouaboutme #sexist theywarnedyouabout-me.tumblr.com

I don’t care how innocent you think you are, if you are getting off to porn where women are getting choked and hit and abused I’m going to kink shame the fuck out of you because a woman’s dehumanization should not turn you on no matter how many “but the actress consented!” lines you try to toss at me.
Why. Does. Beating. Women. Turn. You. On.

#questions #porn #anti porn #anti kink #kinks #kink shaming #shaming #femism #women's rights #consent #abuse #abusive #domestic abuse #physical abuse #sexual abuse #violence #domestic violence

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: REMINDER: The Racepill.

image

(Manletangelo)
Women for comparison: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DcSsuW5XcAAZ1ao.jpg

Source: http://gss.norc.org/get-the-data

IT retard spazzing out after being confronted by an incel: https://i.imgur.com/3TcNX7R.png

(JorgitoEstrella)
Ethnic women are fucking more than white women, and in the other hand ethnic males are fucking less by far than white males.

JBW theory confirmed. And women can’t be incels/femcels confirmed.

(Itookthewrongpill)
Man, black women are having the least amount of sex and have the highest rate of STDS. That's rough.

Meanwhile Noodlewhores are noodlewhoring to an extreme.

(collectorcel)
Well noodlewhores are disgusting, as the perspective of a white european point of view. Even if I had a chance, I wouldn´t one of them, they are golddigger from the finest, no differents if you go to a hooker.

(collectorcel)
If I am seriouse, who would fuck a black chick, someone can call me a Vocel, but I am not suicidal. I would never stick my dick in black biological weapon, you may get Aids or I don´t know maybe they are hidding Anthrax in their pussies.

(arissiro)

so black femcels are real?

Sort of real but not so really. I’ve kept up with Black women bitching and moaning about their sexual situation with quite keen observation, and this is what I can tell you: black “femcels” are often middle class black women who grew up in predominantly non-black environments, and can’t attract the non-black men in their (predominantly non-black) social circles and workplace.

Many of them look down on black men the way Asian and White women do. If you actually look at online dating stats, Black people in general fail when they go for other races; the black “femcel” problem could resolve itself if they stuck to Black men. The disadvantage faced by Black women in online dating however is peanuts when compared to what Asian men (East and South) face. If Black men held higher social value then Black women could be compared to Asian men more accurately.

Black “femcels” exist for the same reason any “femcel” exists: their hypergamy goes beyond their own reach.

(Thanks4HoleStranger)
Black women are the most unattractive by a rather large margin. Simple as that.

Both sexes prefer lighter skin but also prefer a physique in line with their preferred sex. Asians are very feminine in general and blacks are very masculine in general, so asian men and black women are the least desirable. But black women have the double whammy of having dark skin and a more masculine physique. Asian women hit the jackpot with light skin and feminine physique, and white chads get the masculine frame with light skin. That's why asian women and white men are the most preferred among their sexes.

Black women are just ugly, that's all there is to it.

(LeninistSkynet)
Mayocels are mostly just mentalcels with far-right issues. Blackcels are mostly too smart, nice, geeky and introvert to fit in with their primal low-inhib negroe community. The only real trucels are Asians and Indians.

(ITtears)
Hitler's dream is coming true. Only whites reproducing

(uthant123)
I suspect the romantic prospects for Asian men were always poor. Early surveys probably skewed towards newly arrived/immigrant couples or men with strong connections to the old country where they could find a partner.

In the mid-2000s, it seems we begin to see that the sons of these couples are feeling the full brunt of the racepill as they lack any of the advantages of their parents.

(youknow889)

How the fugg are there more sexless blacks than whites

you obviously don’t hang around a lot of black people. most black men get zero girls. serious. black women don’t like black men these days or are only going for hyper athletic, rich and tall blacks.

black people use hookers more than any other race. vast majority of women will never date or have sex with 99.99% of black men.

Marthijn Uittenbogaard #fundie marthijn.nl

Most people believe that the moral laws in our society are justified. If not, these moral laws would have changed already. But looking back, we see that the morality has changed. When you look at the sexual morality, then you see a lot of changes compared to one hundred years ago, but also when you compare it to some decades ago. Sex outside marriage is much more accepted nowadays. Homosexuality is much more accepted. Contraception is much more accepted. Adult pornography is much more accepted. Some things are still not accepted by a large majority of the people in Western countries. Abortion and prostitution are still under fire by many people, and everything concerning child erotica, child sexuality and child pornography. I predict that all these things are going to be accepted by a large majority in the future.

In the 1950s, writing about sexual stuff could lead to the prohibition of that writing. Books with the word ‘neuken' (fucking) in it were banned. The morality police would come into action. Porn magazines were not allowed, and what was considered porn at that time also included images like sexy lingerie photos we today see in public advertising on billboards. The adult porn movies and magazines were partly to satisfy our feelings of lust. But they were also at the same time of a political nature: they challenged our sexual norms. That is why many porn videos were shoot in civil household situations. Not in a modern looking art décor household, but in an old fashioned one. To challenge our norms. Let us be thankful to those early pornographers.

Most child porn today is produced by children themselves. This I read in De Groene Amsterdammer (18 October 2018). We as a society want to warn the children not to make sexy images of themselves. We always want to solve this problem with the repression of children's sexuality, because that is what we don't want: sexual active children. We lie to them, that we just want to protect them. There is nothing wrong, in my opinion, with minors producing porn. There is nothing wrong with minors uploading these images and videos on the internet. It is only wrong if someone does upload stuff without the permission of those involved. We have privacy laws to prevent or punish such behavior.

When pornography, including child pornography, will become more accepted, then the shame will at the same time decrease. So involuntarily sending someones nude picture to a friend of yours would be, while still wrong, less damaging. Less unnecessarily suicides will occur. We just have to learn people, of all ages, to be kind to each other, not to bully each other, and to respect their wishes, their privacy. Only looking at pictures never should be illegal. Even if these pictures are of an abusive nature or placed online without the consent of the children. Almost every adult is interested in child pornography. It is a lie to say only so called pedophiles are interested in these images and videos. Also children are interested, of course I would say, in child pornography.

In the same article in De Groene that I mentioned, we can read that the Dutch morality police does not want to arrest all child porn viewers anymore. They have not the capacity to do so. (No public institution ever says we have too much people employed.) They pick the dangerous ones to prosecute. People working with children, they consider a threat. And of course if you are caught by someone that informs the police they will prosecute. Or if you are a prominent figure. So when the Dutch morality police has a list of hundreds Dutch IP addresses they don't go after all of them. How kind of them… I still see them as bastards destroying lives of innocent people. You only need to go after persons that do bad things. I'm convinced these people (doing bad things) are a minority of the people caught by the morality police. I also hope the Dutch morality police will not share foreign, like US, IP addresses but I'm afraid they do without hesitation, knowing about the cruel and inhuman life destroying convictions in many countries.

So when more and more people are producing child porn, more and more minors producing such stuff; when more people are watching it, then in the end the morality police and our society as a whole will say: it's normal, let's change our laws. That is how it always goes with morality laws. So when you read that a man is caught looking at improper images concerning minors, then hope for him that his friends will not turn down on him, hope that he will not get punished very harsh. See him as a hero doing things you wanted but not dared to do. I write he/him because women are more sexually repressed and they are still behind, they will one day also enjoy child porn as much as men do and hopefully as children do. I believe in freedom for all.

Stephanie Relfe #fundie metatech.org

[I was about to submit this to CSTDT until I read the part after "What can you do?"]

At around 1 a.m. on Sunday, April 26th, two doctoral students at the Louisiana State University (LSU) were mysteriously found dead at the bottom of a swimming pool. 28-year-old Ishita Maity and 25-year-old Anton Joe were with the schools physics and astronomy department with Maity studying theoretical astrophysics while Anton was a 3rd-year graduate student studying theoretical gravity.

Maity was an author of one of the journal ‘New Astronomy’s’ most popular recent papers entitled “Black hole spin dependence of general relativistic multi-transonic accretion close to the (event) horizon”;

Joes’ most recent paper was … written for the European Organization For Nuclear Research, also known as CERN.

There is much more important information in the rest of this article is excellent. Please go here

The author Stefan Sandford points out that this part of CERN:

image

reminds us of the statue of Shiva, the god of destruction, which is outside CERN. Why would a so-called scientific establishment spend many thousands of dollars creating such a thing, and put lights around it to make sure you can see it at all times?

[...]

THE ABYSS

We would like to pay particular attention to this part of Sandford’s article:

“There are also several recent videos about the possible dangers of CERN including the 2nd one, a documentary from FBCFilms called “CERN: Opening The Abyss

That word “abyss” is most interesting, because the French Finance Minister used that same very word, when he made the really bizarre statement:

“We are on the edge of a climatic abyss. We have 500 days to avoid climate chaos.”

Abyss:

1) A very frightening or dangerous situation, or one in which there seems to be no hope

2) a bottomless gulf or pit

And remember these guys are all lawyers and every word is important. Remember Bill Clinton when he said

“It depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is”.

[...]

THE POPE CONFIRMS SEPTEMBER 2014, 2015

The Pope confirmed that Sep 24 2015 (in the USA) is very, very relevant, because he made the bizarre step of telling us on Feb 5 that he will speak to congress about ‘climate change’ on Sep 24 2015! The same date! What has the pope got to do with climate change? With the USA government? Why did he tell us so such a long time in advance? Was this a signal to certain groups that something is getting ready to happen?

We know that many Satanists dedicate their lives to the Pope, because of what Svali told us.

Because no one believes anything the government says, would a final, last minute, “so long, pal” announcement by the Pope be what they have planned? If he finished his speech and it happened within the hour, no one would have a chance to react?

We know one thing – a giant meteor hit would certainly cause the climate to change! See what just a small meteorite can do

What can you do?

While we would like to believe that people are rising in their vibration, and that we are about to break free of this matrix, evidence is to the contrary. It seems more like we are devolving into Idiocracy and Sodom & Gomorrah. For example, how can we have a high and holy vibration when and one porn website in the USA gets 4.4 billion page views a month, and the United Nations said there are now 4 million child porn websites. [...]

It sure looks as though something is coming. We believe that for most people (that is, not the oligarchs), it will be fast and painless. [...]

We recommend you do these things:

1) Make sure you have enough food, water and supplies so you don’t have to leave your house for at least 3 weeks, if necessary.

2) Pray for guidance. Move if God tells you to.

3) Prepare for the next life. Especially pray for –

Forgiveness of anything bad you have done,

Family line curses and

Sins of past lives,

to ensure that if you have to come back again, it’s a whole lot better than this one.

Forgive anyone who has harmed you, to set yourself free, so that you can move on and don’t have to be with that person next lifetime.

4) Know that God loves you and does not blame you for the mess this world is in. The major blame is on Satan, the reptilians and the mind control and massive systems set up by the fallen angels. (For example, they drop aerosolized thought control vaccines on us, as shown by this video from the Pentagon).

Be happy. Have no fear. If we leave our bodies, it will be fast and painless for most of the people on earth. To learn more, learn about how great most people feel when they drop their body, during near-death experiences.

MOST IMPORTANTLY OF ALL!

Remember, if they send aliens to pretend to save you, remember they are just coming to stock up their freezers and torture chambers.

Bill Johnson & anti-porn marchers #fundie onenewsnow.com

Representatives of several pro-family and anti-obscenity groups will be gathering in Washington, DC, next week for a prayer breakfast and formal march to the Department of Justice, where they are seeking action on enforcement of decency laws.

One of the marchers on May 19 will be longtime pornography foe Bill Johnson of the American Decency Association, who feels the past two administrations have not done an effective job of enforcing current law, resulting in a proliferation of hard-core porn.

Luckynkl #fundie radicalhubarchives.wordpress.com

Julie Bindel denounces the Hub? Seems to me, she also denounced women, lesbians, a battered women’s shelter and RF conferences, among other things.

We’re not her sisters? Nope, apparently MRAs in skirts, who totally despise her and plan on eating “Julie Bindel Lemon Drizzle Cake,” and think Julie is “full of nonsense” (both Paris Lees quotes) and post Julie’s genitals to the internet (also courtesy of Paris Lees), are your sisters. Good luck with that, Julie.

Apparently RF Hubbers are rabid maniacs for comparing Julie’s statements from a year ago to the statements she’s currently making and saying WTF to the contradiction? No, no, no,not those boys in skirts who are pro-porn, pro-BDSM, pro-prostitution, anti-female, anti-feminist, homophobic, lesbophobic, and support the sex roles which keep women down. Not those boys who, as Doublevez alludes to, want to take a Louisville slugger to your head, run you over with their cars, burn you at the stake, slice, dice and rape you in every orifice, and want to rape, murder and commit violence against you in 1,000 different ways. After all, boys will be boys. That about sum things up for you, Julie? Oh wait. That’s right. These boys are your sisters! Like I said, good luck with that, Julie.

But I understand, Julie, why you are a coward and a sell-out. These boys are really, really scary. What protection do we have to offer you? These boys decide whether or not you get a paycheck and can eat and have a roof over your head next week. What do we have to offer you? These boys have gods made in their own image and are in charge and rule the world. What do we have? I can’t blame you for selling out. You’d be a fool not to know which side of the bread it’s buttered on.

But **sigh** as I’ve said for over a decade now, kissing the boys’ ass will not save your own. It doesn’t matter if you sell out or capitulate to them or not. It doesn’t matter how compassionate or empathetic you are or how much you love them or don’t. It doesn’t matter how much you sacrifice yourself, take care of them, do for them or don’t. It is irrelevant. In Germaine Greer’s famous words, Men Hate Women. Men despise and hate women for being female. Period. That is our crime. Be-ing female. Not for what we do or don’t do. You can kiss these boys’ ass now until the cows come home and it won’t change a thing. At the end of the day, you will still be female, and men will hate you for that. Deal with it.

Miguel #fundie theantifeminist.com

Ephebophilia (or ‘hebephilia’) is a word commonly bandied about online by individuals wishing to differentiate between men (like themselves), who are attracted towards underage teenagers, and ‘paedophiles’ who are sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. Of course, the media, and the legal system, makes no such distinction. However, many who would champion the right of men to have sexual relations with girls currently under the age of consent feel strongly that if this distinction was more widely known and accepted then it could facilitate a more reasonable public discussion on the age of consent and the laws and punishments relating to sex with teens. Paedophiles are evil perverts and beyond the pale, but ephebophiles? Well, they are not so very different from the average red-blooded man – they just like their women a little bit younger. Yes, they are suffering from a clinical disorder, as paedophiles are, but it’s not so harmful and they are a lot closer to the normal spectrum than subhuman paedos.

So is ephebophilia a real thing? Does the concept serve any useful purpose in the context of the feminist war upon male sexuality and age of consent issues in particular? And am I just as much as a hebo as some of my former readers who have championed the label in the past, such as ‘Human Stupidity‘?

As regulars will know, I’ve made a point of strongly disavowing the very idea of ephebophilia. There are two good reasons for this.

Firstly, my experience of ‘ephebophiles’ both here and elsewhere online. Self-identified ephebophiles tend to be universally 1/ clearly autistic 2/ tactically clueless 3/ prone to paedocrisy and even 4/ Left-Wing and pro-feminist (obviously some exceptions, such as HS) and certainly ‘anti-misogynistic’.

To put it bluntly, based upon my experience, such people are worse than useless in the fight against the Sexual Trade Union. I’d rather go into battle against an Isis horde with only a dozen disabled, pacifist, transgenders alongside me than these creepy ‘ephebophiles’. Hell, I’d rather take on a handful of Russian Ultras with a thousand English football hooligans to back me up. That’s how pathetic these aspie hebos are when it comes to the street fight we are all in.

Secondly, I see no strategic advantage whatsoever in embracing the label of ephebophilia. ‘Hebos’ are so clueless that they really do believe, in their aspie naivety, that the same hysteric mobs who burn down the homes of pediatricians will take kindly to a group defining themselves by a slightly different Ancient Greek term meaning ‘ perverted love of underage girls with hair and perky breasts’.

Of course, this isn’t quite fair. Ephebophilia means ‘love of youth’ (form the Greek word for youth – ‘hebe’). And the attraction to young post-pubescent girls is indeed normal. The point is, to paedohysterics, a word doesn’t change a thing. David Futrelle, child snuff porn apologist and paedocrite that he is, is right to mock the idea that it could ‘win over’ feminists or the paedo hating population at large. In fact, it could make things very much worse. I have spoken here before of the fact that shows like ‘To Catch a Predator’, and ‘anti-paedophile’ vigilantes such as Stinson Hunter, nearly always target men who are trying to have sex with girls only a little under the age of consent. They never try to entrap real perverts and child molestors.

The reason why we have this insane moral panic over ‘paedophiles’ is not because perverts who molest 5 year old children are hated. It’s because society hates and fears even more the normal men who break age of consent laws by having sex with nubile young teens. Paedocritical men are shouting at the bulge in their pants at the thought of climbing into bed with a sexy 14 year old, and all the legal consequences that would follow for them, and paedohysteric woman (and feminists) are shouting at the millions of men who would not even hide the bulge in their pants and openly pursue teenage girls if it wasn’t for the law, the shaming, and the feminist induced hysteria over ‘paedophilia’.

It is true to an extent that establishing the concept of ephebophilia in mainstream discourse would help to clarify what real paedophilia is and isn’t. Real paedophilia is a psychological perversion involving the sexual preference for pre-pubescent children (in today’s USA, that means girls under the age of 10 or so). But at the same time, I see absolutely no advantage in replacing one clinically defined pathology with another. Anti-feminism is the fight against the feminist suppression and pathologizing of normal male heterosexuality. It is normal for men to be sexually attracted to females who have started puberty and who have the maximum number of fertile years ahead of them.

Ephebophile activists believe they can identify themselves as a group and fight for and eventually win their sexual rights, just as gays (supposedly) did. No they can’t. However, MEN can perhaps reclaim their sexual rights against feminists. Only normal, heterosexual MEN can win in the fight against the war on male sexuality.

With all this said, however, I wouldn’t be honest not to add my own personal experiences over the last couple of years, and describe how they have perhaps enabled me to look at the ‘ephebophile question’ in a new and more nuanced light. For some time I’d largely given up on dating. I was getting older, I was still introverted and awkward around the opposite sex, and in any case, as ‘the Anti-Feminist’ I saw all women as rapists, every one of them limiting male sexuality in order to futher their own selfish sexual ends. Walking down the street and smiling at a pretty jailbait as an act of defiance was the limit of female involvement in my world.

For over two years now I’ve been spending the majority of my time in Eastern Europe. As most readers accept here, Slavic women are much more feminine and better looking than their Anglo counterparts, with Russians at the very apex of the female beauty pyramid. Furthermore, they age rather differently too. Yes, of course any normal man would be attracted to even an average Russian 15 year old girl, but the ‘Manosphere Myth’ that I’ve criticised here in the past regarding peak fertility and women reaching their maximum attractiveness at 21-25 isn’t so implausible when you constantly see such stunningly beautiful long legged slim women in their early twenties all around you.

In Eastern Europe I don’t get the achingly painful sense of regret at seeing a pretty 14 year old girl and thinking that by the time she is legal, she will already be losing her youthful charm and beauty. The fact is, in the UK, and even in countries such as France and Germany, the majority of girls are burnt out, bitter, overweight slags by the time they reach 18. Because of diet, lifestyle, and genetics, even pretty 14 year olds do start to lose it by the time they are off to university. In Eastern Europe, puberty arrives a little later, lasts longer, and everywhere you turn there are 20 year old women who are ravishingly beautiful, have perfect skin, possess the long slim legs of ballerinas, and who wear elegant fashions with a graceful air.

Furthermore, I’ve fallen in love with at least a couple of such specimans. One of them is now 26. I have seen photos of her when she was a teenager and the curious thing is she didn’t look anything special even at 17. By 21 she was modelling, and even now as she approaches her 30’s, I get jealous looks constantly when I am with her, even in a city where HB8s are the norm. Even the likes of Krauser PUA would give me a nod of respect if he saw me with her. Look closely and she has crow feet developing around her eyes. Her skin is no longer perfect. But if I could re-wind time I would not wish her any younger than 21. And it’s not down to make-up either. I have seen her without, and she is still beautiful, and more beautiful than she was when she was a schoolgirl.

Another of my girlfriends is 20, and very pretty. She still looks like a teen, and even behaves like one in many ways, though thankfully more in a cute than insufferable manner. Although beautiful, I do not recieve so many jealous looks when I am with her as when I am with the woman who is a good deal older. This girl, I only met recently. I have seen photos of her when she was 18, and she looked almost perfect. I would have liked to have known her then, and I would still not object to a girlfriend such as her who is 16 or 17. However, in Eastern Europe the age of consent is not such a weighty issue given the mass of beautiful females aged above even 18. And this is probably why paedohysteria is primarily an Anglo-Saxon phenomenon.

So in the light of my experiences, how would I finally appraise ‘ephebophila’? As to whether it is a real thing, I am both more and less inclined to say yes. Despite my disavowal of the term here in the past, I somewhat suspected that I might be ‘a little different’ to the average man. Not just in being honest about attraction to young teenagers, but perhaps more strongly attracted than most. Although partly right, I think I had simply fallen into the same mistake that I’d rightly accused self-identified ‘ephebophiles‘ of making. The honesty to accept that teens are attractive can lead you to identify yourself, even subconsciously, as ‘somebody who is attracted to teenage girls’ and different to other men, and to somewhat ignore the charms of slightly older females. And this is compounded by the disgraceful state of femininity in the Anglo-Saxon world, a world in which the only feminine and loveable girls left are indeed mostly under 18.

If ephebophilia exists, therefore, it is not a clinical disorder, such as real paedophilia is, but rather a situation in a man’s life brought about by feminism and the state of women in the Western world.

And as a badge, it’s still tactically clueless and aspie.

My experiences of falling in love have also altered somewhat my views on ‘normal male sexuality’ in the sense that I now give more value to the merits of sex within a loving relationship. Of course, I am not now claiming that the female monogamous system is ‘right’ for men. I am currently in love with two beautiful women, and I think I have emotional room left for a couple more as well, hehe. All I’m saying is I no longer mock the notion of love, and that sex with love is, after all, something that every man should be able to experience as part of a happy life. I also look at porn less, and so I have to admit, I am closer to Eivind Berge’s view that real relationships are better than fapping. However, I still feel that he doesn’t understand the dangers of giving the slightest credence to feminist arguments against porn. And also, not many men can have girlfriends as good looking as his, and not many men approaching 50, as I am, can walk down the street with a beautiful 20 year old, or a HB9 26 year old, as I can. Porn never stopped me having relationships. Rather, it was a life-saving substitute in fallow times. It also helped to keep the flame of desire alive as I sank into middle-age.

And that thought leads nicely onto a final word regarding my contribution to men’s rights activism and the lack of updates on this blog. Yes, I am in some ways happier and more content than before, and therefore no longer feel the need or have the desire to carry the stress and time commitment of regularly posting articles here. It’s also true that I certainly no longer feel any personal pain at current age of consent laws. I would certainly be satisfied forever more at having relationships with beautiful Slavic girls aged 16 above, or even 18 above. But this certainly isn’t the reason for my lack of involvement in men’s rights. I still maintain that the ‘age of consent’, or more correctly, all the many issues that revolve around it, as part of the wider assault upon male sexuality by feminists, is the leading men’s rights issue. But perhaps I am less inclined to maintain this site, just when I am finding some happiness and sexual satisfaction, to cater to disloyal self-identified ephebophile readers such as the likes of Jon or Human-Stupidity, themselves prone to paedocrisy whenever it suits them.

Scottie Nell Hughes #racist rawstory.com

CNN contributor and Trump campaign surrogate Scottie Nell Hughes accused Hillary Clinton of the meeting the “definition of bigotry” for speaking out against racists and white supremacy.

During a Sunday panel discussion on CNN, MTV correspondent Jamil Smith argued that Trump’s hiring of Breitbart chief Steve Bannon showed that GOP presidential campaign was a “rebranding of white supremacy.”

“I would say that [Breitbart is] part of the white supremacist machine,” Smith asserted. “They are trying to make sure these views become mainstream. And I think, through Trump, they are finding a way to do that.”

Hughes, however, accused the media of “redefining what fair means in this election.”

“Hillary Clinton’s problem, she’s having a problem with engagement,” Hughes opined. “And she’s worried about in November, the same very valuable demographic of the African-American vote is not going to be as engaged as they were in 2008 and 2012 to get out and vote.”

According to the pundit, Trump had been right to call Clinton a “bigot” because the term was not only about racial discrimination.

“Bigotry, if you look at the definition, it’s about someone who’s small-minded and sits there and directs hate towards a certain group,” she explained. “Hillary Clinton’s speech [attacking alt-right conservatives] was all about hate towards a group that, while my fellow counterpart might consider them to be very racist, it’s the exact opposite.”

“These are God-fearing, baby-loving, gun-toting, military-supporting, school choice-advocating Americans!” Hughes added. “And just because maybe there might be some, a part of a very small fringe group [of white supremacists] that read Breitbart — by sitting there and saying the entire website is white supremacy is kind of ridiculous as saying just because you have people that are anarchists and communists that read the Huffington Post, calling that newspaper establishment, [is like] saying that they’re pro-anarchy and they’re against the United States government.”

Smith clarified Breitbart’s role in promoting white supremacy.

“What they present is the view of the white supremacist mentality through their coverage,” he observed. “It’s not necessarily saying, ‘Well, everyone who works there is a white supremacist.’ I don’t know that.”

“The point is to say, what kind of viewpoint did they reflect? And it’s undeniable that they reflect a white supremacist view if you looked over their coverage over the last several years.”

Blood and Soil #racist jta.org

(JTA) — A banner with an anti-Semitic slur hung over a synagogue’s Holocaust memorial and fliers left on cars in a New Jersey township are related to the arrest of several area haredi Orthodox couples for welfare fraud, police said.

The incidents occurred over the weekend in Lakewood, where at least seven haredi Orthodox couples were arrested last week for underreporting their incomes to receive government benefits, including a rabbi and his wife as well as his brother and his wife.

Brazen anti-Semitic hate on full display as #Holocaust memorial in #Lakewood is defaced pic.twitter.com/7CMCh2ivkl

— ADL New Jersey (@ADL_NJ) July 2, 2017

The banner hung at Congregation Sons of Israel reads “(((Heebs))) will not divide us,” using the anti-Semitic echo symbol popularized by the “alt-right” to highlight Jewish names. Heebs stands for Hebrews and is used as an ethnic slur against Jews. The banner also lists a website for a white supremacist group.

Anti-Semitic fliers referencing the arrests were placed on cars throughout the township as well, the Asbury Park Press reported.

New Jersey Attorney General Christopher Porrino in a tweet posted Sunday called the incidents “sickening.” He also reminded the public of the $10,000 reward from the state for information that leads to a bias crime conviction.

various tumblrers #sexist asians4whitebulls.tumblr.com

(ingtld)
She, like all the other asian girls you know, has only ever dated and had sex with white men. You know that most of your male asian friends must be virgins like you although you never discuss it. They do however often complain about asian girls being sluts. That’s kind of dumb in your opinion because you know for a fact your sister has been faithful to her boyfriend since the beginning, just like every other asian girl you know.
Sometimes the talk gets very racist. You make a half hearted attempt to fit in but you usually keep quiet. They’re so full of anger and frustration but all you feel is turned on and embarassed. You’re reminded of all the white male asian female porn you’ve watched. For you porn is asian girls taking white cock. You like white girls too, obviously, but your fantasies about your sister always require you to switch back to asian girls when you need to cum.
You can’t say what you really think to your friends. You’d like to use all the same arguments you’ve used online but you know that would be a crazy thing to do. They’d think you were gay or some kind of cuckold. No, it all has to stay a secret.
You spend a lot of time promoting interracial sex between asian girls and white men on the internet. You have several blogs on different platforms. Of course some white guys are behind the posts, and some asian girls and even white girls too, but you know the majority of material is produced by asian boys like yourself. The idea that asian girls should only be cummed inside by white men is so powerful and important to you. Yes, it’s about fulfilling your own sexual fetish of course, but it’s more than that. It just feels like it’s the right thing to do for so many reasons.
You’re caught between the lustful belief that asian girls should never be with asian boys and logical knowledge that there should always be a large pool of pure asian girls for white men to own. You suppose there are plenty of asians in their own highly populated countries so it doesn’t matter if asian girls in western countries go white only. That’s a sensible solution. It’s ok for asian boys like yourself and your friends to stay virgins. You wonder if any of them use that thought to cum.

(cantfightnature)
It’s more than a fetish. It’s reality. It’s destiny. It’s nature.

(asians4whitebulls)
Time to face reality that all your Asian women belong to us white cocks and encourage all the girls you know to go white only. Yes little boy, that includes your own mother, sisters and friends.
To all the females, if you haven’t went white yet, then what are you waiting for? Your life is without purpose until you’ve been with a white cock and then you will truly understand.
Message me if you need help turning your women over to white cock or submitting your pussy to white cocks.

(asianwhore4white)
If my brother can send me to a white family…

felidame #sexist felidame.tumblr.com

being a bi radfem really is something else because deep down the only way you know you could be happy with a man is if, among other things, he doesn't watch porn and the only men who don't watch porn in 2018 are hardline trads who don't think women should vote

#radfem #radical feminism #bisexual #bisexuality #anti-porn #being bi is so nice in theory but men are trash #so you're female-exclusive but guess what a lot of lesbians aren't into bi girls #and it's tough to find bi women who aren't also... like that #you know what I mean #personal

Westboro Baptist Church #fundie rawstory.com

Proving that there is no limit to fundamentalist Christian extremism, the ultra-conservative Westboro Baptist church has launched a crusade against Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis despite all parties being against same-sex marriage.

While Davis is sitting in jail on contempt charges for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, members of the extremist Westboro Baptist church in Topeka are threatening to go to Kentucky to protest against Davis for being an adulteress –due to having been married four times — and for causing “F*g marriage” because of her sinfulness.

Davis, who converted to Christianity four years ago maintains that she cannot issue licenses to gay couples on religious grounds, calling it a “Heaven or Hell decision.” Despite that, members of the Topeka church have launched a Twitter jihad on Davis saying she is a “phony divorced/remarried traitor to God,” and “#NotChristian.”

Addressing Davis, who has been married four times –twice to the same man — and reportedly had twins out of wedlock, Westboro tweeted: “‘Surely as a wife treacherously departeth from her husband, so have ye dealt treacherously with me.’ -The LORD”

A sampling of Westboro’s less than Christian charity towards Davis below.

Now that #KimDavis is in jail, time to criminalize homosexuality, adultery, fag marriage & fornication, and book 'em Danno! #FollowGodsLaw

What if a clerk denied #KimDavis a license for her 2nd/3rd/4th marriage because Christ calls it adultery?

image
#KimDavis & her "Christian" ilk have contributed as much to fag marriage as @HRC @TheAdvocateMag & other militants.

image
It's time to pack this sign and visit Kentucky -- land of the phony divorced/remarried traitors to God. #NotChristian

KY clerk Kim Davis would NOT feel at home at Westboro Baptist. She a fake (hence her 3 husbands!), @MattMurph24 >>

image
If Kim Davis has any real fear of God she'll resign and move out of the house from the man she lives w/ in adultery!

Kim can't keep living/sleeping with a man not her husband & say she's repented. Any more than "gay Christians" can. https://twitter.com/attitudemag/status/640149018186809344 …

Christ: “Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: ...
Luke 16:18 https://twitter.com/wbcsaysrepent/status/639617003221749760 …

hayden #fundie bbs.payableondeath.com

I say we just make it harder to get our perversion on in public. And tax the flipping crap out of porn, and turn the internet porn free unless you get a special box or something that releases the porn...That special box would cost $999.99(pulled that number our of thin air) and the money would go to help fight child sex crimes..which is caused by porn in the first place... Then we adopt a one strike and your out law when it comes to abusing the anti-porn law. We keep the FCC at it's current pace. Hopefully most of these pirverts will go up into Canada or over to Europe.

Bradford C. Walker #conspiracy #crackpot #homophobia bradfordcwalker.blogspot.com

I never thought my elderly preacher uncle was CIA, but he was when he was on mission in Uganda in the '60s. Never thought I'd run into spook-tied spawn in tabletop RPGs, but there's that MI6-tied guy who writes books about China (James Palmer) that curiously support a specific Globohomo narrative.

Most of the anti-porn crusading isn't going to find purchase with normies until the exploitation hits someone--some woman or child--close to them, or they can see how others use the porn business as a front for other nefarious perfidity such as compromising government and corporate officials at all levels of society so the network can blackmail them into doing what's demanded of them.

[...]

Scratching the surface for any corruption of the culture and you will find spooks involved. Not just KGB. A lot of this was CIA/OSS, and when you dig deep enough those distinctions disappear into the more familiar (for us, now) divide of pro and anti-Globohomo. This is where things like the Finders and all those missing kids being recovered come into the situation; the above-the-fold porn business masks the under-the-table trafficking of all sorts of vulnerable people, some of which is to slake thirsts that cannot be countenanced (e.g. the pedos those kids were meant for), and the rest is to play honeytrap in operations like that Epstein and Maxwell ran.

WARNING: Disturbing, Graphic Content Ahead

Child and infant rape with BDSM, Legally binding pedophile apologia

Justice Kathleen Caldwell & Dr. Mark Pearce #sexist thestar.com

[font=sans-serif]This post has one of the highest proportions of "legitimately serious possible triggers" to words I've seen: Count(triggers) / Count(words) hardly ever hits closer to 1 than this, so I'm not even going to try to list them; the "award" alone should give enough caution of what lies below. There are at least a couple things that cross over into other hotbeds of psychological traumatization, ones barely tangentially related to any form of child abuse or rape. I put what I thought were the worst parts in light grey, and I decreased the font size (partially for length and partially as a subtle, mild deterrent). If you decide to start reading this, and it starts fucking with you mentally, or even if you start wondering if what might come next will, then just stop. I should have. –shy[/font]

Court says ‘pedophilia does not apply’ — because perpetrator is a woman

Female pedophiles. She-monsters.

No such thing. Probably not. A woman can’t be a pedophile. Probably not. The clinical research is thin. Maybe the experts will change their mind, by and by. That happens a lot in the imprecise science of psychiatry.Although one expert’s mind was not changed by this:

A toddler sits at the woman’s feet, his small hands holding on to either leg. In this position, the woman — naked below the waist — masturbates using a baby bottle. The toddler, giggling, then grabs the bottle and drinks from it. The woman looks directly into the camera and smiles. That was one video seized by police from the Toronto home where the woman lived with her husband. On another video, the same woman is lying in bed with the same toddler. Both are naked. She begins to lick the child’s anus. Looking at the camera, she smacks her lips. A third video: The little boy is seated naked on a change table. The woman puts the child’s penis into her mouth. The child giggles.

In all, investigators discovered 25,066 child pornography images on more than 50 electronic devices when they executed a search warrant on April 25, 2016, including 111 child porn movies.

The couple is also shown engaging in BDSM (bondage/domination/sadism/masochism) activities with other couples. Police also found a contract signed by the “Slave” and her “Master,” an agreement containing rules and tasks to be completed by the woman as the submissive member in the relationship. They’d met through a website called “Bondage.com.” That’s who Jason Dickens and Dylan McEwen were, a man and woman joined in holy BDSM during a 2007 “collaring” ceremony — literally collaring — followed a year later by an ordinary wedding in front of family and friends.

Last week, Dickens, a former actor on Degrassi High, pleaded guilty to several child pornography offences, including two counts of making child porn, with an agreed statement of facts read into the record. Earlier this year, McEwen also pleaded guilty to sexual assault and two child pornography offences. She was sentenced to six years. But what the presiding judge would not do was declare McEwen a dangerous offender, which the Crown had sought and with impassioned urgency. In rejecting the long-term offender order, Justice Kathleen Caldwell weighed the various criteria that must be met, primarily a “substantial risk of reoffence.” Caldwell determined that McEwen wasn’t such a risk, relying heavily on the evidence and psychiatric report prepared by a forensic psychiatrist with expertise in paraphilia and sexual deviancy.

Dr. Mark Pearce was agreed upon as an expert witness by both the Crown and the defence when he testified in February. He diagnosed McEwen as a masochist and low-risk to reoffend [sic]. Caldwell accepted Pearce’s conclusion that McEwen derived sexual arousal not from acts committed against children but from the “extreme humiliation” of her involvement in those acts, which fed her masochism, described as on the moderately severe end.

The judge wrote (and read aloud in court): “Dr. Pearce testified that the current research suggests that women do not suffer from paraphilic disorders apart from masochism. This fact lends further weight to the conclusion that pedophilia does not apply to you.”

Crown Attorney Lisa Henderson, the judge noted, had “rigorously challenged” Pearce on this assertion.

“(I) agree that at first blush it appears illogical that women do not suffer from other paraphilic disorders,” Caldwell continued. “Sometimes, however, that which appears reasonable is anything but and vice versa. I accept the doctor’s evidence on this point. He did agree that this conclusion might change in the future as psychiatry continues to develop, but I cannot base my conclusions on speculative potential that have yet to develop.”

In this particular case, McEwen was her husband’s slave, committed to do his bidding. Court also heard, however, that McEwen had initiated at least one of the toddler videos without her “Master” present. And in at least two earlier instances, McEwen had obtained child pornography from two men she’d met online before she’d even met Dickens.

As for the risk-assessment testing, Caldwell acknowledged that such testing hasn’t been validated as being accurate in predicting risk with female, as opposed to male, sex offenders. They don’t really know what they’re talking about, the experts, because they haven’t looked at the phenomenon closely enough.

As an aside, at the Dickens trial, court heard that in 2003 a London-area woman offered him her 14-year-old daughter for sex after they’d connected online. Dickens took the teenager on a movie and date night, then had sex at the girl’s home while her mother sat beside them. Sex with teens and children had clearly been a feature of the couple’s role-playing, in their video commentary to one another, the child porn retrieved from their home and posters also discovered depicting female children, labelled with such descriptors as “15-year-old f--- slut” and “whore.”

In an interview this week with the Star, Pearce emphasized the scarcity of research literature on female sex offenders: “I’m not saying there’s no such thing as a female pedophile , but it is almost an exclusively male disorder. That’s not to say no woman has it. There may be some outliers. But women (sex offenders) usually offend for other reasons, not because of an innate sexual attraction to children. [...] These are damaged, needy, lonely women, not necessarily pedophiles.”

There was immense frustration at 720 Bay — in the attorney general’s office — over McEwen dodging the dangerous offender designation. But there will be no appeal.

Pastor James David Manning #fundie huffingtonpost.com

image

An anti-gay church in New York City’s Harlem neighborhood greeted passersby with a horrifying, homophobic message: “Jesus would stone homos.”

ATLAH Worldwide Missionary, led by Pastor James David Manning, posted the message on a sign outside its 123rd Street location. “Jesus would stone homos,” the message read, along with “Stoning is still the law” and Bible verses Matthew 5:17-19, Deuteronomy 17:5-7, Leviticus 20:13 and John 8:1-11.

The Leviticus passage, which is often cited in anti-gay rhetoric, says: “If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.”

Everett Corley #racist rawstory.com

A Republican congressional candidate plans to ask a judge for a restraining order to stop the removal of a Confederate memorial on the campus of the University of Louisville.

Everett Corley — a real estate agent, GOP candidate and would-be Donald Trump delegate — announced he would file a temporary restraining order Monday in Jefferson Circuit Court to stop Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer and U of L President James Ramsey from dismantling the controversial memorial, reported the Courier-Journal.

“It is a political version of book burning,” Corley told the newspaper. “And the fact is, I’m not in favor of book burning.”

Fisher and Ramsey announced Friday they would remove the 121-year-old memorial, which sits on city-owned property on the university campus and has attracted student complaints for years.

Corley, who is running in a three-way GOP primary for the chance to challenge Democratic Rep. John Yarmuth, said he would file the restraining order on grounds that it caused irreparable harm to himself and the community.

“This will, in our view, detract and damage the entire cultural history of Louisville and its residents,” he said.

Corley filed a criminal complaint and lawsuit against the executive director of the Jefferson County GOP, who he accused of assaulting him in March outside a party meeting.

The candidate told police that Byron Fisher “violently grabbed my right arm and pushed me with the other hand, suddenly and without provocation.”

The 48-year-old Corley, who provided a copy of the complaint to the Courier-Journal, said the incident made him “extremely anxious and (his) blood pressure increased to dangerous levels.”

Party Chairman Jim Stansbury said he witnessed the incident, and he said Corley’s claims were overheated and exaggerated.

Stansbury said Fisher put his hands up to block Corley from entering a private office, and he said the party official may have touched the candidate — who strongly reacted to the contact.

“He started yelling, ‘Don’t you touch me. Don’t touch me. That’s criminal assault,’” Stansbury said. “There was nothing that raised it to that level other than in Everett’s mind.”

It’s not clear that Corley ever served Fisher with the complaint.

The lawsuit accused Fisher and the GOP of breach of contract for collecting $5 in fees to allow him to participate in the delegate process but would not allow him to become a delegate from the district of his choice.

Corley, who backs Donald Trump in the GOP presidential election, changed his voter registration earlier this year from the 28th legislative district to the 43rd legislative district.

His lawsuit asks for compensatory and punitive damages.

Corley, who has previously run for office under the name Corley Everett but has since changed it for family reasons, faces Bob Devore and Harold Bratcher in this month’s primary election.

His Facebook page reveals strong support for Trump and the Confederacy, and he also shares phony memes about a wall between Mexico and Guatemala and complaints about “black thugs” removing white farmers from their land in Rhodesia — the white-rule name for what is now Zimbabwe.

Dylann Roof, the white supremacist who gunned down nine worshipers at a historically black church in South Carolina shared similar interests on his own Facebook page.

Corley was endorsed in a previous race, under his old name, by the white supremacist American Freedom Party — which also endorsed white nationalist Harry Bertram in a West Virginia statehouse race and neo-Nazi Robert Ransdell, who ran for U.S. Senate in Kentucky.

His current campaign promises to represent “the majority who built this country: the American of Valley Forge and Bull Run” — referring, respectively, to the Revolutionary War camp that holds special significance for Christian conservatives and to a Confederate victory in the first major battle of the Civil War.

“Illegal immigration costs thousands of lives through criminal acts, hundreds of thousands of jobs, billions of taxpayer’s dollars, and compromised the future of America,” Corley said. “I have witnessed young Kentucky men lose hope when local jobs disappear and the educational system betrays them in favor of ‘multiculturalism.'”

Corley reached out to white supremacist William Daniel Johnson, the national chairman of the American Freedom Party, in January — perhaps to notify the racist political activist of his name change.

Cam Triggs #fundie desiringgod.org

The hot steam of a deadline breathes down your neck. It’s two o’clock in the morning, and you are alone in your office completing a last-minute project. As you viciously beat away at the keyboard, you pause and turn to the Internet as a resource. While browsing the Web, you notice an ad: “Free Porn.” You look at the popup appalled, yet intrigued.

In the isolated dark office, sin disguises itself as “free” — free of cost, free of accountability, and free of consequences. Don’t believe the lie. Deconstructing the phrase “Free Porn” may save your marriage and ultimately your relationship with Christ. Here is a truth we desperately need today: There is no such thing as free porn.

Free Porn Is False Advertisement

Satan, the world, and the flesh combine to make a perverse, yet persuasive marketing firm. Satan is the source and father of lies (John 8:44). The world is under his control (1 John 5:19), and the flesh swindles us to believe God may be mocked while our hearts deceive us as well (Galatians 6:7–8; Jeremiah 17:9). It is clear then that spiritual warfare has much to do with battling the lies of this unholy trinity. It should not surprise us that Satan, the world, and our own flesh feed us lies to enhance the temptation of sin.

A wise Puritan said, “Satan presents the bait and hides the hook.” He is a crafty enemy that presents immediate pleasure, yet hides catastrophic consequences. There are few lies greater today than the myth that porn is free.

There is always great cost in viewing porn. It is never free. It always costs money. It will always demand we surrender integrity. It will always force the corruption of Christ-centered character. Many men have paid for so-called “free porn” with salty tears, broken marriages, and hours of counseling. Many women have paid for so-called “free porn” with vicious memories, broken bodies, and shattered souls.

God frees us by giving us the truth (John 8:32). The simple truth is that porn always costs us dearly, and it is never a victimless crime. Peer-reviewed research suggests that porn is highly addictive, negatively affects our behavior, and functionally operates as a destructive drug.

Porn has also been proven to ruin marriages, stress relationships, and decrease the desire for true intimacy with monogamous mates. In other words, porn kills relationships and diminishes our very being.

Porn also leaves a trail of tears and scarred victims. Many in the porn industry have testified of disease, drugs, violence, rape, and even sexual trafficking plaguing the business.

And above all, porn dishonors God. It perverts the sacred creation of God and exchanges it with lust, selfishness, and greed. What God created for good, porn perverts for evil. It takes his good gift of sex and devalues it. Porn makes sex about deviant pleasure, cheap romance, and gross satisfaction.

God intends sex to be so much more. God created sex for the purpose of cultivating intimacy between a man and his wife, and to be the means by which the blessing of children arrive. It is no coincidence, then, that both children and marriage are now devalued in today’s porn-ified culture.

Freedom in Jesus

Porn is sinful, and the saying about sin is still true: It will cost you more than you can pay and make you stay longer than you can stay. Sin is not controllable or stagnant. Sin is decadent. First you are walking in sin, then you are standing in sin, and before you know it you are sitting in it (Psalm 1:1–2). The same is true with porn. You think you can quit whenever you want. But you can’t. Porn is increasingly addictive, readily available, and like any other addiction more is needed the longer the practice continues. For many, porn has evolved from a curious click into a crippling addiction.

Here is the good news: There is freedom from “free porn” in Christ Jesus. The false security, enslaving escape, and luring lust of porn will only leave you empty. But in the good news of redemption in Christ, we find concrete security, promised perseverance, and true water that quenches the soul.

In Christ, we find the intimacy we truly desire as reconciled children to an almighty Father. In Christ, we find the free offer of grace that comes without any strings attached or any webs that deceitfully entangle us into bondage.

May Jesus truly set you free with the true freedom that exposes the lie of free porn.

Strivingsoul #racist en.wikipedia.org

(This fundie is talking about David Duke)

He claims that every people have a right to preserve their heritage. And that multi-culturalism leads to ethnic tension and conflict and destruction of distinct cultural traits of each people. We may not agree with him but he's making a compelling case for his view, and this is unfair to rush to frame it as racism simply because he is against massive aggressive immigration into Europe and America. He also cites Jewish sources which show how multi-culturalism was promoted by Jewish organizations in order to weaken the Christian culture of America. On a related topic, here is one of the Jewish sources he directly quotes that you can see for yourself.

The Jewish author admits and brags about their role in the notorious porn-industry and its dark anti-Christian goals: Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. (This is really interesting for me, since this is a pattern I have myself witnessed in another case. Israeli Prime Minister Netanhayu had also advocated regime change in Iran back in 2002 through cultural and moral subversion -- by advocating beaming hedonist and degenerate Hollywood productions by a gay Jewish director into Iran in order to corrupt Iranian youths until they revolt against their Islamic government). Just as evident in this example, his book primarily draws from Jewish sources to present his thesis.

Most of the book content are NOT his opinions but just quotes after quotes! He is not also claiming there's a crazy conspiracy theory but that Jews have an enormous influence over US media and politics and therefore deeply influence the US culture and politics. And again he backs up his claim by providing testimony from Jews themselves. Here is one of the testimonies he quotes from a Jewish author: I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe "the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews," down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood. So we can probably suggest that this guy talking about "total control of Hollywood by Jews" is a self-hating anti-Semitic Jew!!

And I'll also be happy if you show me a Duke's recent statement that says Whites are superior to non-whites. There could've been such statements coming from him during his youth where he held more radical views, but I've not seen any statement along that vein in those of his works or articles over the last two decades that I have studied.

various TERFs #sexist#homophobia reddit.com

[Note: Comments in the thread “Actually, no, I won't date or waste my energy on 'Trans Men' or 'Non Binaries'.” by ToughTelephone]

(scienceisarealthing)

Where? Your sentiment is hardly new. It gets posted here daily. What you say is true, but I don’t see anyone here supporting TIFs unquestioningly. I see people pointing out that young GNC lesbian women are victims of transactivism and patriarchy, but that’s not the same thing.
Radical feminism is about tearing out the roots of oppression, and the root is patriarchy, not female victims of the system. Fuck Aunts and handmaidens, but they are the symptom, not the disease. This isn’t letting them off the hook, it’s just not playing the patriarchy’s game for it by never looking beyond the puppets to the dudes pulling the strings.

OP is right, unfortunately I don't have specific links but I have seen often on this sub where women here are berated for not being sympathetic to misogynistic TIF’s or considering them our “sisters”. It's not tearing down female victims of the system to not sympathize with women who actively harm other women.

The vast majority of women have some level of misogyny just from living under patriarchy. I wish all women could wake up from it and question those beliefs. I am sympathetic to confused women who are told to transition without being given other option for healing. The system is broken, thanks to the idiot activists and those in the medical industry wanting to profit. I’m sympathetic to people who suffer from all kinds of illness.

I’m not sympathetic to people who think they are better than other women because they are men now.

I have not seen someone being berated for not accepting a TIF. what kinds of threads does it come up?

I agree we should have sympathy for gnc women who are socially pressured into transitioning or felt they had no other option. I've seen threads (sorry don't have specific links) where women were told they were infighting, tearing apart the sisterhood, or being manipulated by the patriarchy, (and other things along those lines) for not supporting sexist, maladjusted TIF's.

To me, it seems like guilting women into performing emotional labor for misogynists with personality disorders, and I think it's a symptom of female socialization to have endless sympathy towards people who hate us and even want us dead. I think we can all agree we want feminism to benefit all women, even the horrible ones, but there's a limit to the amount of patience & attention women should give to manipulative, harmful people.

(georgiaokeefesgrotto)
Not from me. I've seen the Tifs and their idea of women as 'junk and udders'. I welcome them back into womanhood if they smarten up but many are cruder than truckers in a rest room on a long haul. Eff them.

(1984stardusta)
“The only reason everybody is talking about transgenders is because white men want to do it.”

Chappelle received lots of criticism for rhis joke, and more, for pointing that Mexicans or blacks wouldn't get the same treatment, genderism is a white problem.

I see no problem in people dressing up or behaving like the opposite sex, this is far from new, but I can't accept a bunch of privileged white men endorsing violence against women they will rebrand as TERFs and advocate for punching into silence. Normally women who identify as men won't do the same, so it is easier to talk with women.

But I can't start a conversation with anyone who will acuse me of feeling hate against a whole group, this is a coward accusation, without burden of proof, deeply ingrained in privilege of narrative and self entitlement from whom is so spoiled by their lack of real problems that they need to turn any dissenting voice into an imaginary enemy, they need to destroy competition, they need to be the leader of oppression Olympics even if it means to demean women.

So, being a person of color is a hard life, adding to the equation the false accusation that black women are killing white men when we don't say they are women whenever they feel like to be called so is unbearable.

Right? As a woman I’m tired of being silenced for saying anything about the trans community that isn’t “these people are the best people in the world”. This has a horrible effect on my mental health and view of self. Why are these bizarre new groups that everyone wants to talk about protected to the point that it’s hate speech to criticize or even question anything about them or what they say and do?

About transcommunity?

I can't say anything about myself.

When I say I am a biological woman I am offensive to who is not a woman and wants not only self identify as such, but also take leadership, precedence and dominance over my objective reality. On the same vein I should not use words as menstruation, breastfeeding and vagina but I need to accept meekly to be called a menstruator, and listen about chest feeding and fronthole.

I need to teach my kids to hide what they know about human biology, because I was taught it was replaced by wishful thinking.

I need to teach them to hide their knowledge, and shrink their passion about this subject to fit obscurantism.

And I need to pretend that black women and black men are subjected to more likelihood of being murdered then white men, even when they wear dresses.

I

(SCREECHES_AT_HERSELF)
I couldn't agree more. In my experience, trans men & female nonbinaries are commonly emotionally abusive, narcissistic, and hold some really gross beliefs. Some FTMs even go as far as to become stereotypical "women have it easy, it's men who suffer!" MRAs.

People like that are not worthy of my energy. They might be biologically female but that doesn't mean I owe them anything.

As for dating... I'm not attracted to male secondary sex characteristics (even if they're artificial) so no, I'm not interested in trans men. Plus the whole misogyny and "your personality dictates your sex" things are huge dealbreakers anyway.

Begone with this stupid belief that us women should have unwavering compassion for everyone, especially people who view us as lesser. No, I won't support trans men. No, being nonbinary is no better. No, I'm not going to get on my knees and kiss the toes of that "gender critical TIM" that people all think is such a gift to feminism.

(greynose_algebra)
I transitioned several years before I discovered radical feminism and became gender critical. I don't know if you would rather not hear what I have to say, but for what it's worth, I think your points are valid and I get where you're coming from.

No one is obligated to include trans people in their dating pool. No one is obligated to support/lift up/perform emotional labor for anyone at all.

No one should have to waste their time or energy on emotional vampires, no matter what their sex or gender-feelz.

You're not a bad feminist.

(Enjolraic)
It would depend on their beliefs on gender. I'm Internet friends with a TIF and she believes that biological sex is real and she's against calling women TERFs or advocating for violence against us. Basically she's a gender critical trans person. But she's a Marxist, and ideologically sound Marxists are hard to come by these days. Most TIFs seem to believe in tumblr politics, hate radfems and expect gay men to date them just because they cut their hair. Even if I was physically attracted to one, I would want nothing to do with someone with a completely different world view to mine.

I'd never want anything to do with NBs. It's one thing to have dysphoria about your sexual characteristics or be transed because of homophobia, but the entire notion of 'non-binary' is based purely on sexist stereotypes.

(Lemortjoyeux)
Some of them are just predatory as TIMs, usually the GAI BOIZ type who are basically straight women who wanted more oppression points or were so obessed by yaoi they decided to live out this fantasy. They get angry when only other TIFs date them because gay men don't take that bullshit. Local horrible TIF in my city is also a YouTuber spewing lies and distracting from others arguments because she doesn't have any argument other than "not accepting my gender identity hurts my feelings". God I hate her and she's one of the main reasons I don't associate with the local gay community.

(thewilloftheuniverse)
The only Transman i personally know was a friend from high school, who is a second generation Desi. I was especially struck at the fact that the male name she took was "Todd," exchanging her Indian female name for a white male name.

At the time it only made me confused and sad for her. Now it makes me angry too.

(Burnbookburner)
I know a Todd TIF... do you think they realize any grown man named Todd is a huge red flag?

(CatLadyActually)
How so? Is it like Chad?

various incels #sexist reddit.com

Meanwhile in parallel universe

image

(LactoseSupremacist)
THIS IS WHAT NORMIES ACTUALLY BELIEVE

(-TheWhitePill-)
I think they larp because they don't actually believe it, but they need to try and make it true, other wise their reality comes crashing down.

We didn't create theblackpill, it was always there, we just accepted it

(Crazylikethatglue)
Yep. They believe sexual attraction is about personality. Friggin dicktwats..

(Its_Lucid)
Porn sites are specifically catered to males because it’s so easy for females to get sex, so they rarely watch it.

(VirtueSignalling101)

Men watch more porn because men are evolutionarily inclined towards promiscuity. More women = more babies. More men =/= more babies.

Yet women watch the most hardcore porns in much higher percentages. Brutal gangbang, rape, forced, etc.. those are all the most searched female porn searches. You won't find females searching for 'sweet looking guy' or 'sensual blowjob'. For females, sex is literally all about the biggest framed high-T bone structure male with the biggest dick who has no facial abnormalities. It's evolution instinct. The fucked up part of evolution is only making less than 10% of males the type females truly desire while making males able to desire 90% of women in some way.

(itsfunnyeventootherm)
Just because women all watch the same porn, and makes the same comments IRL about mens bodies doesn't mean that's what they prefer, they're all unique snowflakes!

Pomidor Quixote #sexist dailystormer.name

Mothers Furious After Watching Rape Porn Make a Porn Film to Show to Their Kids

Some mothers will make their own porn films to educate their kids about what sex is really about.

This isn’t even peak degeneracy yet.

Daily Mail:

A group of five mothers are making a porn film they would be happy to show their children after being disgusted by watched X-rated videos online.

One mother was so horrified by online porn that she threw up and one was so traumatised that she quit the whole process.

Sarah, 40, from North Wales, cried while watching rape-based content during the mothers’ research portion of the show.

According to The Mirror, she said: ‘If that was the first time I’d seen anything about sex I’d be petrified. I just thought all of a sudden that I was going to throw up.

‘We need to show kids that there’s something else than this horrible sh*t we see on the internet.

‘If my son treated a woman like that I would kick his a*** to kingdom come.

She added: ‘Porn doesn’t represent normal women, the actors and actresses they use mislead kids. They need to realise it’s not normal.’

The mothers are making their own porn film as part of a Channel 4 TV show called Mums Make Porn.

The three-part series will see a group of mothers create a film with sex in it that they would be happy to let their children watch.

Their mission was to create a porn film which promoted positive attitudes towards sex and realistic expectations of what it involves.

They worked with industry experts and were given all the tools they would need to make the film.

At the end of the series, the mothers reveal their X-rated film to their friends and family, including their children.

That’s right, kids. Mommy will teach you how to fuck women now.

How about not letting kids watch porn instead?

They’ll likely say that that’s just not realistic, but if that’s the case, how can making them watch more porn — even if homemade — be the solution?

Because this isn’t even about porn. It’s about women policing men’s sexuality.

One of the mothers literally said “If my son treated a woman like that I would kick his arse to kingdom come” and that is the perfect synthesis of what all of this depravity is really about; women not approving of how men experience their sexuality.

Old story, really.

Don’t let front-holes tell you how to fuck. You are the one doing the fucking. These bitches do nothing but lay there anyway, so what say should they have in the activity?

If they don’t like it, they can go get themselves fucked and beheaded by niggers.

Besides, women really enjoy when you’re not concerned about their enjoyment of sex. They actually want you to take control over their bodies for your own pleasure, without worrying about their pleasure.

It’s all just a gargantuan shit-test.

Vernaculis, et al #fundie twitter.com

[In response to the panel on Linking White Supremacy and Anti-Abortion Movements]

Vernaculis: It’s awesome that the panel just outright says what they’re planning to do without shame. They could’ve named it “Exploring Possible Overlap Between Racist & Anti-Abortion Extremism.”

Very sub-par propaganda effort

#EnoughisEnough: maybe your being sarcastic & I’m not following(?)
So I will state what is true:
The pro-abortion movement & cash-crop industry was founded by white supremacy in favor or race cleansing/eugenics.
Read about Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood :
https://www.frc.org/op-eds/margaret-sanger-racist-eugenicist-extraordinaire …

IliveontheInternet: Abortion kills more blacks then whites. So in essence out-lawing abortion would increase the non-white birth rate. Something the alt-right hates.

Ava Aelius: I mean, is it propaganda to show that the white genocide conspiracy crowd would also be anti-white people getting abortions?

Colonel Crackbaby: Smart white supremacists would be pro abortion, considering POC are morw likely to be aborted. But no one ever accused white supremacists of being smart.

California Police & members of Traditional Worker's Party #racist theguardian.com

California police investigating a violent white nationalist event worked with white supremacists in an effort to identify counter-protesters and sought the prosecution of activists with “anti-racist” beliefs, court documents show.

The records, which also showed officers expressing sympathy with white supremacists and trying to protect a neo-Nazi organizer’s identity, were included in a court briefing from three anti-fascist activists who were charged with felonies after protesting at a Sacramento rally. The defendants were urging a judge to dismiss their case and accused California police and prosecutors of a “cover-up and collusion with the fascists”.

Defense lawyers said the case at the state capital offers the latest example of US law enforcement appearing to align with neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups while targeting anti-fascist activists and Donald Trump protesters after violent clashes.

...

Some California highway patrol (CHP) investigation records, however, raise questions about the police’s investigative tactics and communication with the TWP (Traditional Worker's Party).

Felarca’s attorneys obtained numerous examples of CHP officers working directly with the TWP, often treating the white nationalist group as victims and the anti-fascists as suspects.

The TWP is “intimately allied with neo-Nazi and other hardline racist organizations” and “advocates for racially pure nations”, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. Its leaders have praised Trump, and the group claimed to bring more than 100 people to the Charlottesville white supremacist rally, where a counter-protester was killed.

In one phone call with Doug McCormack, identified by police as the TWP affiliate who acquired the permit for the Sacramento rally, CHP investigator Donovan Ayres warned him that police might have to release his name in response to a public records requests. The officer said he would try to protect McCormack.

“I’m gonna suggest that we hold that or redact your name or something until this gets resolved,” Ayres told McCormack, adding that he didn’t know who had requested records of the permit and noting, “If I did, I would tell you.”

Ayres’s reports noted that McCormack was armed at the rally with a knife.

The officer’s write-up about an African American anti-fascist activist included a photo of him at the hospital after the rally and noted that he had been stabbed in the abdomen, chest and hand.

Ayres, however, treated the protester like a suspect in the investigation. The police investigator recommended the man be charged with 11 offenses, including disturbing the peace, conspiracy, assault, unlawful assembly and wearing a mask to evade police.

As evidence, Ayres provided Facebook photos of the man holding up his fist. The officer wrote that the man’s “Black Power salute” and his “support for anti-racist activism” demonstrated his “intent and motivation to violate the civil rights” of the neo-Nazi group. He was ultimately not charged.

Pomidor Quixote #sexist dailystormer.name

i][From "Honorable Chinese THOT Patroller Scripts Facial Recognition Tool for Amateur Pornsluts"]

This Chinese programmer showers the Chinese people with GREAT HONOR.

His heroic creation and intentions will not be forgotten.

Daily Mail

A user on China’s popular social media website Weibo claims that he has developed an algorithm that can match the faces of porn actors with their social media profiles.

As reported by Vice, the user who purports to be living in Germany said his software has ‘successfully identified more than 100,000 young ladies‘ which he then used to create a searchable database.

In a Twitter post which has since gone viral, a PhD student at Stanford details the users claims in a post.

[...]

While Vice reports that the creator and his friends intended for the tool to be used by men who are engaged to women that they suspect of being featured in porn on the internet, or what he calls the ‘right to know on both sides of the marriage,’ he has since rolled back some of those claims.

In subsequent statements, he claims that the platform is to be used by women who suspect that explicit videos of them have been uploaded to the internet without their consent.

This is how we officially start the THOT Patrol agency.

Once we have facial recognition data for women featured in porn videos, we can do multiple things with it.

1. Create a “THOT/WHORE/SLUT or Not” website

We could have a site called something like www.thotornot.com to let men search the database by uploading a picture.

Think of Google’s reverse image search, except instead of finding similar images and instances of the image, you upload the face of a woman and you get search results if she’s featured in porn videos.

Take that one step further and…

2. Have a “Coalburner or Not” function

Once you identify their face in a porn video, it may not be too complicated to let the database know the likelihood of a brown or black being featured in that video.

But why stop there? Have the thing not only search for porn videos, but also search social media pictures of them where blacks and browns are also featured, so you not only get results if they’re featured in a porn video but also if they have any social media images with browns or blacks.

3. Make a THOT-Patrolling AI to automatically Patrol THOTS

A program can be running that constantly scans social media for new profiles and porn sites for new uploads, and cross-references facial recognition to find matches. Once it finds a match, have the AI send automatic emails and messages to the social media contacts of the whore with links to her porn videos (you’d have to work around being labeled as spam though).

It could also scan existing videos and social media profiles to create an even larger database, but that would probably need even more space to store that information. The possibility is there though.

An AI that automatically identifies whores and informs their family about their whoring would be world-shaking.

Why stop there? Pictures where alcohol or drunk people are present and pictures of whoring parties are okay too. The kind of pictures that would be shameful.

4. Make women scared of whoring on the Internet

Whores gonna whore, but we can make them terrified of whoring on the Internet.

They’d be scared of posting pictures and videos of themselves, and terrified of other people taking pictures and videos of them.

We could kick whores off of the Internet.

“BEGONE THOT!”

asianwhiteworship #fundie asianwhiteworship.tumblr.com

(Remember cantfightnature? This shit is similar.)

The New Asian Sexuality

Preface

Asian males do not own Asian females or their sexuality. This toxic attitude has unfortunately led to the resentment and hatred of Asian women for simply expressing their desires and living their lives. This is about the development of Asian sexuality in the 21st century. By accepting and evolving to this new arrangement, Asian males can live more fulfilling lives in the process.

The New Asian Sexuality

Over the past decades there has been an evolution in Asian sexuality which has been bravely led by Asian women. The old pairing of AMAF has diverged, as many Asian women are now solely having sexual relations with White men. The WMAF pairing has become a sexual revolution for Asian women. More are choosing this as their sole sexual identity, and Asian women are more empowered than ever to express and own their sexuality in the way they prefer.
This development has led to enormous increases in promiscuity and sexual freedom. Many Asian females now have numerous white sexual partners throughout their lives, some having sex with tens or dozens of men. Asian females also feel empowered to regularly share White men with other Asian females. The new Asian sexuality has dramatically increased both the amount of sex and pleasure Asian women have on a regular basis.
This hyper-promiscuity is one of the biggest positive outcomes of the new sexuality. Asian women have been liberated from antiquated feelings of shame due to having large numbers of White sexual partners. They have more fulfilling and active sex lives than ever before. In addition Asian women in the 21st century have also become very confident and powerful in society. Attending top universities, filling many high corporate positions, and becoming wealthy and influential.
However some Asian men are resentful about this new arrangement for reasons that might seem justifiable on the surface, but are actually quite indefensible.

Asian Heterosexualism

Due to the success of Asian women the Asian male must now converge his own sexuality with the new reality. The disunity of preferences is what causes feelings of resentment. It cannot remain the case that only Asian women have a sexual preference for White men. This must become the preference of Asian males as well. Their sexuality must also now be based on the expectation of WMAF sex by default, like their women, and it must be supported and respected with care and understanding.
The new Asian male heterosexuality is still traditional in the sense that they are men attracted to women. This aspect has not changed at all, and requires no perceptible alteration of identity. The difference is the focus: The heterosexual Asian male must consider WMAF sex to be the new default arrangement. The heterosexual Asian male must derive sexual pleasure from Asian women having sex with White men. He must come to terms with the fact that he is the passive portion of this sexual triad, with the White male and Asian female being the active participants.

Sexual Preference Transition

One powerful and easy way for Asian males to defeat their toxic masculinity and develop into a supporting ally of Asian women is through extensive consumption of WMAF pornography.
Asian men already watch WMAF porn of course, but it is not done through the correct lense. Some see it simply as sex and entertainment, and do not consider the political and philosophical implications. They ignore a large part of the meaning of WMAF porn through a lack of comprehension: WMAF pornography is the purest depiction of the new Asian female sexuality.
Asian males must transform their preferences to match the evolution of Asian female sexuality. They must be one in the same or else conflict will arise. The Asian female will have sex with White men, that must be accepted. This act is where pleasure and satisfaction must be derived from. It is not acceptable or reasonable for the Asian male to expect any other arrangement.
When their sexuality is aligned with their women, then the toxic attitudes will cease. If both the Asian male and female can derive pleasure from the same act: WMAF sex, then they will find that it is easier to have harmonious relationships. The men will be accepting of a partner who wishes to maintain her sexual identity, and who will continue to have sex with White men.

Dave Blount #racist moonbattery.com

Short of ISIS, it would be hard to imagine a more nefarious movement than Black Lives Matter, which has repeatedly inspired riots and the assassination of police officers in the name of ultra-left black supremacist ideology. It’s also hard to imagine what students must be learning at the University of Vermont in Burlington, where the Black Lives Matter flag flies alongside Old Glory at the same height:

University of Vermont President Tom Sullivan says he is standing behind the student government’s decision to fly the Black Lives Matter Flag on campus.

Sullivan said flying the flag outside the student center is not about an endorsement of the movement by the university, but reflects that students wanted to support the African-American community in the wake of recent police shootings in other states.

In other words, it is not about an endorsement, but rather is about an endorsement.

Fortunately for BLM thugs and their fellow travelers, black criminals will continue to get themselves killed by police on a regular basis, as they have for as long as there have been police to protect the innocent. This will provide a steady stream of sanctimonious outrage to cover what they are actually promoting: anarchotyranny, collectivism, a race-based caste system, hatred of whites, and hatred of America.

various TERFs #sexist reddit.com

YouTube shooting suspect dead; identified as female

(FeminamRadicalis)
The question is: what do they mean by female? Do they mean a biological woman born woman with XX chromosomes? Or do they mean a male who feeeeeeeeeeeeeels like a lady and therefore is somehow a "female"?

It will be a bit of time before we know. Since this is a tech company, the latter seems like a safer bet due to the glut of TIMs in tech. I will be very surprised if the assailant turns out to be an actual female, but stranger things have certainly happened. If the attacker is a TIM, I sense a push towards peak trans coming for the US.

(st_quiteria)
I'd rather not speculate. Amy Bishop is a woman, after all. Women occasionally have violent impulses and act on them for a whole host of reasons. Maybe you should consider deleting this comment before it gives the trolls ammunition.

(FeminamRadicalis)
I honestly could care less what the trolls / stalkers make of any comment I've made, this one included.

I did allow for the possibility that the shooter might be an actual woman by saying "stranger things have happened".

However, it is true that TIMs retain male patterns of crime rates and further that TIMs are per capita much better represented in tech than actual women are.

It's also interesting to simply consider that we are now at a point where we are forced to speculate if the use of the term "female" implies an actual biological woman or a male who says he feels like a woman. We can't know off the bat if this is a real woman or not, due to the rapid way in which that word has shifted in meaning over the past few years. That's quite chilling, really.

It's quite normal to speculate on current events such as this type of shooting, as they've very sadly become rather commonplace. You don't have to do so, and of course you're allowed to state that you don't want to and don't think others should either, but in turn I will state that I think it's perfectly fine to speculate and warranted in this case, since it's incredibly rare than an XX female would commit a crime like this (even though it does happen in a few extremely rare cases).

(NotSerenaJoy)
This. We are told the shooter is female, but that word is so meaningless in the mainstream now that we don't know what is meant by this information. We shouldn't be having to speculate about this. We should hear that a woman has shot people and be, "Woah! A female shooter, how crazy is that, what does this mean....." Instead we are here wondering, is it actually a woman? The shift in language because of the trans agenda is really messing with everything.

.
.
.

Because we are socialised to not be angry, but to be compliant and passive and most importantly, nice. It's internalised in us to not react violently and certainly not with deadly force. Even when we do reach boiling point, our socialisation still holds us back so that we never or at least very rarely react fully and release everything that is pent up inside of us. It's just not nice to be angry you know.

Men however are socialised in the opposite way. Be angry, be strong, stand up for yourself, don't take shit, never be compliant, get what you want at all costs. That sort of thing just screams "shoot everyone if they look at you funny".

(WrongToy)
I don't want to be blamed as a group for something a male may have done. I found so much of this account, from the 12-hour ride up from Riverside, the shooter knowing where the bf was, the suicide afterward, to have been so male-pattern.

This person is tall, wears scarves around the person's neck often, and in his performances is angry in a male way. Plus, in this person's country, SRS is the prescribed remedy for a gay male.

(Lil_Z)
The other thread appears to have been deleted, for reasons unknown. I hope it's not because the mods think it makes us 'look bad'. As you say, we are perfectly within our rights to speculate about this shooter's actual sex, given that the media is now regularly reporting male crimes as female ones.

Speaking of which, I think this person is almost certainly male. Take a look at the photos in this Daily Mail story, especially the one where he's holding a bunny. Looks like a male body, male neck, male face to me, and I'm a bit baffled that many don't seem to see it.

One of the comments on the DM site says 'Is that a man', but there are many more observing that something looks 'weird' or 'not right' about 'her' face. (One commenter says 'she' looks like an alien, while another says 'she' reminds him of an avatar from the Sims.) I guess femininity cues do throw people, such that their brain will categorise a male person as 'female' based on those cues, while also simultaneously observing that that isn't a female facial structure, hence the uncanny valley feeling that arises telling them that something is 'not right' about the face.

I don't think this will ever be admitted openly by the media. If he'd been a white, US-born TIM it probably would have been, as his trans status would likely have been part of both his social and online identities. But because he is (most likely) an Iranian gay man who transitioned very young, he's unlikely to have been open about being trans to many people, and I very much doubt his family will be inclined to mention it to the media either.

So now we can all be subjected to the joys of think pieces that ponder the meaning and motives of 'female' mass shooters. Just like when trans Twitter engineer Dana McCallum raped and beat his wife, one of the liberal rags (Slate I think) took the case as an opportunity to highlight the problem of 'lesbian' domestic violence.

In the next couple of years, we will probably see handwringing about the inexplicable rise in the number of 'female' rapists and pedophiles, which will allegedly show that our previous beliefs about these being male-pattern crimes were 'wrong'. It really is chilling, how completely the media is cooperating in this Orwellian reversal of reality.

(yishengqingwa666)
Sorry about your penis, inseminator.

Radladiesunite #fundie radladiesunite.tumblr.com

Dear trans women…

I dare your privileged first world asses to go to other parts of the world and tell women who have been victims of FGM and sex trafficking that you ‘identify’ as a woman and that you don’t like when they talk about their vaginas and how they’ve suffered for being born with a vagina because it hurts your feelings and makes you feel ‘invalidated’. ://////
Tell those same women that you love porn and feel like prostitution is 'empowering’. (((((i can already hear them:“hum hi yeah it’s not vaginas that are the problem it’s when you equate them to womanhood’. well you people think any mention of female biology is violent transphobia. Not everything is about you and your #firstworldgenderistproblems))))

#trans #transgender #cis #terf #anti #terf #transphobia #radfem #libfem

lagertha #fundie dailykos.com

For anyone who has been living under a rock the past few decades; "misandry" is a derogatory word used against women who do not pay deference to male people that society thinks they should. The word was used against Andrea Dworkin in character assassination for writing about the complexities of heterosexuality outside of the boundaries set by men - and without apologizing for it. They labeled her a man hater, a misandrist. They labeled her "sex negative" without ever bothering to read or understand the points she was trying to make (just like some of my own critics). "Misandrist" is the go-to word for antifeminists, misogynists, MRAs, or anyone else who can find no other response to a woman's opinion other than slapping a label on her in an attempt to shame her for showing the slightest bit of personal resolve to be treated like a human being and not a piece of meat.

"Misandrist" is a word very much like the B-word, the C-word, the W-word, the S-word, and other female-specific derogatory terms that are meant to remind a female person of exactly what her place in society is (under a man). "Misandrist," though, is a word that implies political legitimacy to the idea that female people are obligated to positive emotional investment in male people as a whole; and anything outside of that is the exact opposite or "hating men." This loyalty-oath approach is designed to keep women from analyzing and communicating about the power imbalance between the sexes, and how it presents itself on an institutional level.

Poojaxlays #fundie twitter.com

In response to a man who was assaulted with pepper spray:
when u think that ur old age is going to stop anti fascists hahahahahaha good for this big fool

image

In a followup tweet:
They're mad bc I made this tweet about their fascist granddad man was gonna die anyway why dont u angry whites give it a rest.

Various incels #sexist reddit.com

(Enigmatic93)
Guys that fuck landwhales and old ladies are part of the problem

I don't blame guys on here for one second for rejecting obese women and 40+ year old hags. At least they're not contributing to hypergamy. When a normal looking healthy guy gets desperate and fucks a morbidly obese hamplanet or fucks a grandma they make it harder for the the guys on the level of the aformentioned hamplanets and old hags because now these horribly low sex appeal cunts think they can do better, which means that guys that are truly bottom of the barrel can't aim any lower.

(DavidGolani11)
This much is true, there should be no reward for uncontrolled eating

(chudur-budur)
Part of the problem or the main cause of the problem?

(Bloodrot)
I agree 100%

The reason even fat ugly cunts aren't into me is because a Chad came by and fucked them and now those girls feel like they're entitled to a Chad

Fuck those Chads. They're the main protractor of this global issue we're now facing.

(Enigmatic93)
Yup. If you approach a chick with seemingly low value and she rejects you, it's very likely she had a guy better looking than you before.

(TheMubarak1)
I blame the male sex drive. Men will fuck anything even other men. Female sex drive is a joke comparing to male's.

(chudur-budur)
men fuck everything that moves, and this is a fact.

(BasedTruecel2)
Not true. The "virtually non-existent female sex drive" is a meme and needs to stop. I recall a study somewhere that more females watch porn than men, but unfortunately, I can't find it. Even if that isn't true, a lot of females still watch porn and have as much of a sex drive as men do.)

(TheMubarak1)
It's not a meme otherwise chads will be gang raped by women in a high rate. No one said they don't have sex drive but it less than men's. Or there won't be any male incels since you will guarantee a fuck from a woman desperate for a cock. Which is not the case. I got hit by gays twice and never once by woman. So yeah I wish it's a meme but nah.

(Gibitto)
I guess they have the same or more, but they can relieve it easier, when they start to get horny, they just open tinder and have some sex, just like that.

Roosh #conspiracy rooshv.com

Does The Hollywood Elite Use Rituals And Sexual Blackmail To Keep Its Stars In Line?

Most people in the mainstream already know that Hollywood is a liberal safe space that was the first to promote leftist causes such as socialism, drug use, feminism, hookup culture, atheism, environmentalism, homosexuality, and transsexualism. This can be attributed to the fact that Hollywood is run by Jews who seem to greatly dislike traditional America, small-town values, and Christianity. What’s even more peculiar is that we hardly see any infighting between Hollywood actors and the producers or executives who hire them. It’s like they’re one big happy family. Or are they?

You probably already know that the casting couch is a way for directors and producers to have sex with the female talent in exchange for jobs, but what if I were to tell you that male actors also must have sex with other men to get work, and that the top male actors in Hollywood have had to submit to degrading homosexual rituals in order to get acting jobs, and that trophies like the Oscars are not based on merit but on those who have paid their dues into the system by enduring the most humiliation, and that the degrading sexual acts all actors commit are used to keep them in line?

You’d think I’m crazy, surely, but every now and then something happens which lends credibility to “conspiracy theories” that were floating around beforehand.

A couple of months ago I found a detailed article showing how producers, writers, and directors leverage their influence to sodomize young boys. Many of those boys go on to become “heterosexual” male stars, all because they gave up the ass for a shot at fame.

“I never slept with [X-Men producer Bryan Singer] before I was 18,” he writes. “But after my 18th birthday, I was quickly passed off to him by a friend, Gary Goddard, who was having sex with me at 17. Gary was his good friend at the time, so Bryan would be out with us—with his dates of the moment, all young guys. I saw him at parties and out in LA, and we hooked up in Gary’s house when I was 18, like three days after my birthday.”

Two years ago, a compelling video was published that made outlandish claims about the Hollywood system. Here’s a sample of the claims that were made:

– Will Smith, Denzel Washington, and other big-name stars not immune from ritual sodomy
– Benny Medina and Quincy Jones sexually initiated actor Will Smith
– If someone in the Kabbalah cult likes the daughter of a star, he/she must relinquish their child in order to move up
– Queen Latifah initiates Hollywood women using a strap-on
– Monster’s Ball movie with Halle Berry and Billy Bob Thorton featured live sex ritual
– Jewish produced “Ghetto Gaggers” not just a porn but also in Hollywood
– Porn stars go to Pandora’s Box Hollywood sex parties, initiate stars
– Tony Braxton driven out of her mind over what she had to give up to be famous

Wait, Will Smith is gay? No way. The entire video must be bullshit, because Will Smith is heterosexual and masculine. He’s married with two kids. But then his wife Jada Pinkett Smith went full social justice and called for a boycott at the Oscars because it was not black enough. Only one day later, a marginal transsexual actress named Alexis Arquette came out with this, confirming what the above video stated years before

The video explained how Hollywood actors are controlled: their sexual hazing is recorded on video and used to manage their future behavior so it’s in line with Hollywood elite interests. When actors go off the rails, or refuse to submit to the demands of their bosses, “rumors” are leaked that destroy their reputation and acting jobs are withheld from them.

What I think happened is that Will Smith’s “owners” gave Alexis the information to publish in exchange for later favors while making it appear as a “leak.” But if you examine the final three sentences of the Facebook post above, it’s easy to see how those words are coming from the men who write Smith’s paycheck, warning him to get his wife in line immediately. And she did. Not even half a day later, she thanked the Academy for their response.

No further rumors about Will Smith were disseminated. Within only two days, a challenge to Hollywood’s elite seemed completely squashed. Will Smith, sitting on his $200 million fortune, did later double down and state that the boycott would take place anyway. We should now expect him to never work in a major Hollywood blockbuster again.

Consider that in Hollywood there is hardly any public infighting at all, but here in the alt sphere we have fights seemingly every week. Human nature is aggressive. People fight and argue publicly. Yet in Hollywood, everyone is calm as sheep. It could be because stars are controlled. Through submitting to hazing rituals and having gay blackmail hanging over them, they are slaves to the Hollywood elite who give them fame and money in exchange for their complete compliance, including having to display stupid Illuminati symbols in music videos and photo shoots.

Every major actor in Hollywood has made a deal with the devil, and has had to trade things that you wouldn’t, often starting when they were children and passed around to pedophiles, as Corey Feldman revealed. Therefore Hollywood looks not for talent, but for souls, explaining why you can’t even name more than five actors who are actually good. This is the industry that has sway not only among the mainstream American public, but the world as a whole.

One of my favorite actors is Leonardo DiCaprio. Before the recent Oscars, I noticed that he was spouting some social justice ideas:

On Tuesday, Leo received the Crystal Award for “improving the state of the world” at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. During his acceptance speech he called out the “corporate greed of the coal, oil and gas industries” who “have denied and even covered-up the evidence of our changing climate.”

It seemed so out of place for a man who travels around in private jets banging hoes on yachts, but then when you understand that stars must submit to rituals in order to gain favor, and that DiCaprio was up for an Oscar this year, it makes complete sense. He must satisfy his masters by helping their leftist agenda in order to receive a reward. We can only guess what private rituals DiCaprio had to submit to before becoming a top contender for the award—which he did win—especially when he was a child actor, and what gay rumor will come out about him if he ever calls for a boycott against the Oscars. There is dirt on all the stars, and even most of the famous musicians and rappers. If you research the issue further, the rabbit hole goes much deeper than what I’m describing.

My personal take is that the younger someone enters the entertainment machine, and the lower amount of natural talent they have, the more likely they have submitted to deplorable degradations in order to be famous. I wouldn’t be surprised if pop singers like Lady Gaga and Katy Perry serve as personal port-a-potties to industry bigwigs. In fact, Hollywood is probably where the Saudis got the idea to use paid “models” as hired toilets.

I write about this today not to participate in Hollywood gossip, but to shine a light in how elite circles operate. All the actors and singers that you may respect, whose views you may actually allow to influence you, have traded their dignity and their souls for fame and money. All the “masculine” Hollywood actors you like watching in films have certainly been sodomized or privately humiliated. At best, Hollywood spreads anti-male propaganda to the world. At worst, they are devil worshipers who practice every degenerate cause known to man.

I fully denounce Hollywood and their liberalism, their communism, their social justice, and their faggotry. There is no room for them in a man’s life, and I personally won’t be casually brainwashed and influenced by the anti-American and degenerate content they put out.

Orlov #crackpot incels.co

[SuicideFuel] I can't jerk off to porn with small dicks

I have a tiny dick, both in length and girth, but I can't get horny, or jerk off to porn with small dicks. Even when I imagine sexual scenes it's always with a chick blowing or fucking big or at least average dick. I know it's stupid and I tried because I have tiny dick too, but it's just not the same, I dont feel like a guy is really fucking a girl with his small weiner. My erection immediately drops no matter how attractive girl is or how good scene is. This makes me really depressed because that means if I ever got to fuck a hooker or she blows me, I will not feel horny because of my small dick, it's just not the same, she can't deepthroat me or I can't fuck her really hard and it's visually unattractive.

I seriously want to kill myself, I know I'm incel and ugly but If I had average dick at least I would be able to fuck a hooker. I just don't understand why I'm so unlucky in all aspects of my life. I even think Elliot Rodger had the same problem, he had a 4 inch dick and that stopped him from even trying.

nooropia #sexist reddit.com

1. Biological women will become second class citizens all over again. While TiMs can get their greedy hands on either self sustainability through robbing women's college grants and STEM education, or by marrying off to rich men who are attracted to male-to-pornofied-women, biological women will no longer have anymore ways or means to become financially/economically independent. We'd have to marry men again in order to survive, just like in the olden days. And since extreme right MRA fucks are fapping over creating their own virtual girlfriend and sex bots, they will hold it over our heads for the rest of our lives. "If you don't do exactly as I say, Brenda, I'm leaving you for my bot. At least she does what I say without contradicting me. AND she stays 18 years old forever.. can you say the same?" Which will lead to a regressive era of heightened domestic violence rates, date rapes, and general violence against women, and they'll hold the other sex options against us. They kinda used to do this with prostitutes back then. Now, you have to compete against TiMs, virtual porn, and sex robots.

2. Going further about TiMs taking over women colleges and grants/scholarships, this also means that other non-STEM jobs that used to be flooded with women (ie. Education, nursing, store managers, etc) will also be taken over. Porn and lingerie companies will push 'ugly natal' women out for the pornofied TiMs and robots. Which is not so bad, but that only means that now after all other moderately well paid career paths are taken, that means the only vector we'll have left is the service one. Remember the 1920's? While rich women had husbands to care for them, poorer women had to work as maids, nannies, personal cooks, and housekeeping jobs in order to survive. After all, transwomen only want the glamour of being women, and not the actual reality of being a woman: Having to clean up after others, changing diapers, actually taking care of children, etc.

3. Gay men and lesbian women will no longer have safe dating or sex spaces anymore. We'd have to go underground like we used to do. That or buckle under compulsory heterosexuality and marry the opposite sex.. and yes, trans counts as the opposite sex because otherwise you'll be a transphobic bigot. Hearts, not parts! What this may also mean is that, while gay marriage will still be allowed, a new law may be passed in order to protect the vulnerable, suicidal trans community: Same sex attraction will not be protected by law anymore, it will be changed to same gender attraction. So what this means is that a lesbian can marry a woman, but the other woman HAS to be transgendered since actual homosexuality is now seen as bigotry, a sickness, something to be put away to spare feelings. Marriages between two natal men or women will have their marriage licenses revoked. "It's better that way than to hurt the feelings of the trans community." they'll tell us.

4. Speaking of homosexuality, I echo the conversion camp thing, only it won't be done in churches. (It will still be done privately in churches, mind you.) It'll be done by the government to dismantle the cotton ceiling and for gay men to overcome their vagina repulsion/disinterest, and lesbians to overcome their penis repulsion/disinterest. Hearts, not parts! With advanced science, we'll be able to tell which embryos will grow up to become a homosexual adult. Can't have that with vulnerable trans people out there who wants to be loved for who they are and what's not in their pants. Abort all gay babies. Keep the straights, because even though many might not be interested in TiMs and TiFs, they're the ones with the real social power, so the TRAs will keep them around.

5. More and more children and adolescents will commit suicide due to their mutilated and hormonized bodies triggering their psyches. They can't adhere to strict gender roles? Time to kill ourselves.

6. Don't worry ladies; even though the more popular mainstream pornographic vectors will be swarmed with TiMs and robots, we'll still be sexually enslaved due to our depleted options. We'll become the "bottom of the barrel" options for men, who are used to the so called perfect bodies of robots and male-to-pornos. If you think sex trafficking stories are bad now, honey, you got a big storm comin'.

Hatred_Incarnate #sexist incels.co

The careers and lives of men like Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby were completely destroyed by women. Their mistake was to seduce and have sex with women while being ugly as sin. If they were good-looking, none of these accusations would have ever been made. No woman accuses a good-looking man of rape or sexual harassment. Why did it take so long for them to make these accusations? It's because these women now feel ashamed of themselves for having to sleep with ugly men for career advancement; they didn't have a problem with it then because they were shallow money-hungry whores trying to make it (like all women at some point in their lives).

But in retrospect, the fact that they had to serve as sperm receptacles for low-quality men fills them with horror and rage. The only way they could avenge this injustice was by doing what every woman does when an ugly man either flirts with her or has sex with her: go to the authorities and scream rape or sexual harassment. This is also why date rape exists. A woman thinks the man she slept with last night was a little too ugly for her liking, so to punish him for his ugliness she calls the cops and accuses him of rape. The fact that women can easily make up accusations like this to destroy men's lives is merely an indication of the tremendous sex-based discrimination found in our judicial system, as well as all other facets of our modern society. This is all conveniently reinforced by the reigning police-state ideology of female supremacism.

As an ugly man, you don't have to flirt or have sex with women to risk having your life destroyed by them. The ugly man must remember that women are a hive mind, robotic creatures all possessing the same negative eugenic reproductive programming. If women see your ugly face, they'll automatically want to destroy you. In their primitive hive mind, you need to be culled. They'll deliberately make life hard for you, going out of their way to swear at you and make fun of you. Many of them will threaten you with violence, knowing that you can't do anything about it because women are surrounded by dominant males ready to signal reproductive fitness by smashing your face in. They'll even bar you from decent employment, forcing you to seek mediocre, ill-paying work instead. This is because all HR departments are controlled by women.

If you look at them or talk to them, they can have you beaten up by an army of (more) dominant males. Although losers, these men beta orbit virtually every female. Women can make up any accusation they want against you and have you thrown in jail, even if you do nothing to them. Why? Because female privilege. Women are also terrified of being impregnated by low-quality male sperm for obvious evolutionary reasons. An ugly man in close proximity to nubile females simply increases this terror felt by all women a hundredfold. When in the midst of this terror and rage, the woman's primitive hindbrain tells her that she must fight or flee. Because she inhabits a female supremacist society that caters to her every whim, no matter how ridiculous, her best option is to fight back and completely neutralize the threat before her.

various TERFs #sexist i.redd.it

image

Description: A bunch of TERF commenters on r/GenderCritical talking about their ideal post-patriarchal society.

1st comment: Dismantling the patriarchy: remove the ability of males to attain governmental positions for a time no less than two decades.

2nd comment: Only movies that pass the Bechdel test are allowed in theaters. Producing porn or hiring prostitutes is considered rape and penalized as such.

3rd comment: Second, tax incentives for the first two girl babies for any family. For, let's say, a solid 20 years. We'll figure out a way to either sex fetuses very early or maybe develop a spermicide that weeds out xy sperm? Fourth, male crimes against women are classed as hate crimes no matter the circumstances. Paying for sex, whether in porn or via prostitution is now classed as rape and falls under this umbrella.

4th comment: Reduce the male/female birth ratio from 1:1 to 1:10 and modify the y-chromosone to reduce male testosterone as much as possible while retaining fertility. A 90% female society with weak, unaggressive men will be female-dominated naturally.

5th comment: Having said that, biology is part of the problem. I hold the same material belief as some gender essentialists but I take a diametrically opposite moral conclusion from it: gender disparity arises from nature and that means nature is sexist.

Incel Wiki #sexist wiki.incels.info

Feminism

image

Over a hundred years ago a bunch of rich women were upset that they could not move up in official positions of power in work or politics. So they got men to give them the vote and affirmative action for political office. Through legislation women made it even easier for themselves than men to climb traditionally male dominance hierarchies! Only problem is that they aren't sexually attracted to men who are lower in dominance hierarchies of status and money than they are. So as women gained dominance in traditional male hierarchies, they complained a bunch about there being 'no good men'[1] aka the dwindling amount of men wealthier or more powerful than them to give them tingles. As less men gave them tingles more incels were created and more men were sent their own way. And as women gained more dominance in society they complained more about beta males, and "rape" etc...
?
They even created campaigns against these increasing amount of men lower on the social hierarchy than them they are not sexually attracted to like the:

Anti Catcalling Movement: aka 'Men poorer than me better not hit on me in public'

Anti Manspreading Movement: aka 'Public transport users (people poorer than me, or people who have not yet proved they are higher status than me) should not make me think of their junk'

Metoo movement: aka 'Autistic and socially isolated ugly men who can't read social cues should be locked up or ridiculed as much as rapists'[2]

image

Female Contempt for an Obvious Outcome of Feminism: Househusbands

A matriarchal world where women make more money than men would seem to necessitate an increase in house-husbands. The male liberation movement, a subset of feminist MRAs in the 60s wanted a dramatic increase in househusbands. However even in the most feminist countries, women will still expect the man to work or else a breakup, even if she makes enough to provide for the family in an uber-welfare state. This is of course, insanely pointless. Early 20th century anti-feminist and Marxist Belfort Bax' quote still remains true, "Among all the women’s rights advocates I am not aware of one who, in her zeal for equality between the sexes, has ever suggested abolishing the right of maintenance of the wife by the husband."[3]

Even in a country where feminism is intitutional and mainstream, where equal-pay laws are in place, and where women have more total personal wealth than men, "the key factor in the decision to divorce is whether Hubby has a job. If he doesn’t, even if his job loss is involuntary, his odds of being ditched by his wife skyrocket"[4]

As Eggman puts it, "Talk to any US woman and they'll tell you about men offering and actually buying them all sorts of things, when was the last time a woman offered to buy you a house or car, now that we have gender equality and all?"[5]

A 100% Completed Feminist World Be Better for Incels Than Partial Feminism... Theory

So far we see that feminism literally creates incels, but there may be a silver lining in a 100% feminist universe compared to a partial feminist universe, in that feminists feminize societies to the point where all men are so beta that it's not hard to become a chad or to get a woman to agree to be asked out. Since no men ask women out in the 100% feminist universe once men are so beta.

The Eradication of Feminism is Best for Incels... Theory

Because feminism has created more incels, many if not most self-identified incels are trad-con, patriarchal, and don't subscribe to the previous theory and think matriarchies won't be sexually generous. They should argue for a generous patriarchy with strictly socially enforced monogamy as not all patriarchies are alike. In most if not all modern patriachal countries, polygyny arises and men hoard women, causing inceldom as well. And in patriarchal muslim countries, the hoarding of women in harems, inflates the bride-price so high that there exists a vast underclass of singe men who are susceptible to the promise of either real life brides or virgin brides in the afterlife through terrorist organization like al-Qaeda or ISIS. It is for this reason that people joke about incels and muslims terrorists on incel boards. Some incels also believe that the only kind of pro-natalism that can be achieved to wipe out inceldom would be through a racial supremacist movement, which partly explains why people like Richard Spencer pander to incels.

Various Incels #sexist #racist incels.co

RE: [Blackpill] Female sex tourism map

image

A map showing an overview of origin and destination regions of female sex tourism:

Origin: North America (Canada and USA), Northern Europe (France, Germany, Austria, Benelux countries, Scandinavian countries, Finland, UK, Ireland), Japan, Australia, New Zealand

Destination: Southern Europe (Balkans countries, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece), South-East Asia (Vietnam, Indonesia, Cambodia, Phillipines, Thailand), Ecuador, Costa Rica, Turkey, Caribbean, Morocco, Kenya

Are any of you from a red country?

(Personalityinkwell)

Females go to Thailand to bang ricies? I thought was a male phenomenom

(Lookscel)

Wait so white women are going across the globe to fuck ricecels?

Lifefuel for ricecels tbh

(Anonymous MG)

Yes Asia is a bit surprising but the rest is pretty normal tbh : south europeans and lLatinosie: tall dark and handsome

Latinos aren't tall at all, speaking from personal experience fellow Hispanics are rarely ever tall, they constantly get heightmogged by everyone (including Asians).

Southern Europe I could easily see though pewpew.

(loserkarthusplayer)

they should go to africa and take the black cock they deserve

Cucked graycel your mind ruined by albanian porn makers

(Wristlet 2)

"Destination countries: Spain"

I didn't even know that. JFL local chads are fucking all of the country's women AND other countries too while I rot

Lifefuel for SEAcels.

ROFL apparently US cunts are going to the middle of the Ocean.

i wish all women went to the middle of the ocean

(Blackpill Rage)

Landwhales travelling to the middle of the ocean to get fucked by sea whales.

(Pumkin)

always wanted to visit one of those countries. fuck a really petite asian girl.

but alas im white and not rich enough to go there unharmed. i go to bestgore and see all the vids of them killing whites in “suicide” becsuse the locals hate us for fucking all they women

(RREEEEEEEEE)

Also, brutal AF. Look at Japanese females being among those that go to other countries for sex while men are committing suicide en masse and NEETmaxxing. No wonder their birth rates are dying.

(Ultimatepassivecel)

Please dont let whıte women ın middle east not because ı care about them but because ım tired of seeing underage russian foıds hıttıng on 20 something year old chads and bothering me whıle ı try to get drunk ın hotels.

(j-awarecel)

I'm from Spain. There's a lot of foreign foids doing tourism, specially in Madrid, Barcelona, Ibiza and Marbella. I give a fuck, actually, when I'm LDARmaxxing.

Anyways, from a normie perspective:
A man doing tourism is a pedo and drug addict.
A foid doing tourism is adventurous and cultured.

(Lv99_BixNood)

The biggest group of female sex tourists are noodlewhores "traveling" to white countries but they aren't even mentioned, I wonder why

Also there's no way white women go to Vietnam or Thailand for sex, this map is bs.

(Snow Dushman)

Yes, Bosnia falls under Balkans.
Wait did the map just say women go to the Balkans to have sex with slavs?
Slavpill debunked?

Patodp #sexist mumsnet.com

People on here often use Telling Everyone Real Facts...

You'll also notice terf is factually incorrect, and "transsexist" because terfs do include transmen in their feminism, seeing as transmen are female and deserve the protections that women have due to biology, and are welcome in most female only spaces. Everything always has to be about the born males.

Personally I've openly described myself as a terf, I've even half attempted to reclaim "transphobic". Transphobic has officially lost all meaning because absolutely fucking everything is transphobic, even being vegan. I have said actually my fears of what is happening to women's rights in the name of transgenderhood is terrifying. We are all being terrorised by thought police into silence and our fears should be taken seriously not dismissed as an irrational phobia.

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

Some time ago, I and a bunch of other reactionaries had a debate on whether women commonly fuck dogs.

I have no evidence that women of commonly fuck dogs, but I have lots of personal evidence that women very commonly do lots of horrifying stuff that many of my commenters find very hard to believe. These personal observations are perhaps statistically insignificant and may be from an unrepresentative sample of females, but is consistent with the rather small subset of women who watch porn, who generally watch disturbingly deviant stuff, while most males watch fairly vanilla stuff.

Most women read romance, rather than watch porn. Romance male leads are generally demon lovers, rather than the nice boy next door – one notable exception being when the female lead is sold, enslaved, kidnapped, abducted, or subject to an arranged marriage without her consent at a very young age by the otherwise nice boy next door. In the very common genre of supernatural romance, the male lead is often a literal demon. How is a real life male going to compete?

Male and female sexual impulses are the product of natural selection. In the ancestral environment there is biological and evolutionary conflict of interest between dads and daughters, in that daughters prefer cad type demon lovers, and dads prefer dad type sons in law. Daughter prefers the best sperm, but dad does not want to be stuck with support. Similarly a conflict between husbands and wives, in that wives prefer demon lovers, and husbands are seldom demon lovers – the best semen is unlikely to belong to the best protection and support.

For civilization to exist, fathers and husbands have to be able to coercively overrule the sexual preferences of women.

For it to be politically possible for fathers and husbands to coercively overrule the sexual preferences of women, we have to have it generally accepted that women are the dangerously lustful sex, whose dangerously powerful sexual impulses have to be overruled for their own good, for the good of their children, and the good of society – that women’s dangerously powerful lusts and self destructive lusts are the big problem that has to be solved, not immoral males.

Whether or not women commonly fuck dogs, for civilization to survive, men need to be inclined to suspect that they might. For civilization to survive, men need to control women’s sexual choices. For men to control women’s sexual choices, it needs to be politically incorrect to have excessive confidence in the purity and chastity of women. That women are dangerously and self destructively lustful needs to be taught by authority, presented in the media, and the sort of thing you need to believe if you want to get on with the important people you need to get on with if you hope to get ahead.

Nikolas Cruz #racist edition.cnn.com

(CNN)In a private Instagram group chat, confessed school shooter Nikolas Cruz repeatedly espoused racist, homophobic and anti-Semitic views and displayed an obsession with violence and guns.
Wednesday, 19-year-old Cruz opened fire at the school that expelled him, Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. Authorities say he killed 17 with his legally purchased AR-15.
CNN, investigating comments the shooter may have left on a now-deleted YouTube channel, was added to the private Instagram group by one of the active members in it. The responding group members, who appear to be younger than 18, have refused to confirm their identities to CNN on or off the record.

When asked for comment or whether they knew about the private chat group, the FBI directed CNN to the Broward County Sheriff's Office.
Most of the conversation in the group since Cruz joined around August 2017 is between six people -- including Cruz.
"I hate jews, ni**ers, immigrants"
Racism was a constant theme in the chat group, which was called "Murica (American flag emoji) (eagle emoji) great" -- a name it was given by Cruz.
The hatred he and others in the group espoused met little resistance from its active members. In one part of the group chat, Cruz wrote that he hated, "jews, ni**ers, immigrants."
He talked about killing Mexicans, keeping black people in chains and cutting their necks.
There are hundreds of racist messages, racist memes and racist Instagram videos posted in the group.
One member even joked about Cruz's particular venomousness, saying that although he hated black people, too, he didn't "to a point I wanna kill the (sic) like nick."
Cruz said he hated black people simply because they were black; Cruz hated Jews because he believed they wanted to destroy the world.
After one member expressed hatred for gay people, Cruz agreed, saying, "Shoot them in the back of head."
White women drew Cruz's hatred as well, specifically those in interracial relationships, whom he referred to repeatedly as traitors.

There are no indications in the group chat that any member, including Cruz, is or was part of a white nationalist or white supremacist group.

Cruz used paycheck for body armor
Cruz purchased an AR-15 rifle in Florida approximately a year ago, legally. A law enforcement source told CNN's Evan Perez that Cruz purchased at least five guns in the past year.
In a public post on his Instagram page, Cruz showed what he called an "arsenal" on a bed -- seven guns and body armor. Another post on the page is a view down the barrel of a gun with a holographic sight out a window onto the street.
His AR-15 and other guns were a frequent topic of conversation in the group chat.
They even critiqued Cruz's rifle grip. He posted a short video of himself shooting a rifle outside a window at night. The video cuts out shortly after the round is fired.
They discussed which guns they liked better: M16s or AKs.
At one point, one member told Cruz, "Nick get this for your AR." He directed Nick to a website offering an after-market accessory that would turn his AR-15 into a fully automatic weapon.
A law enforcement source speaking to CNN's Evan Perez said that the gun used in the school shooting was not automatic, and there's no indication he bought the accessory, or a similar type of accessory.
When it was payday, Cruz let the group know where the money was going to be spent.
"Guys I got paid 330. I am buying body armor," he wrote.
Cruz did purchase the body armor, according to receipts he posted in the chat -- with a $30 discount and free shipping.
Then he asked the group whether it was legal to wear body armor to school.
"School shooters," he replied, when someone asked why he wanted to know.
"I think I am going to kill people"
The bio on one of his Instagram accounts read, "annihilator."
At one point in the chat, he wrote, "I think I am going to kill people." After a member told him not to say things like that, he said he was just playing.
During one of the anti-Semitic rants in the chat, Cruz spoke of his birth mother, saying, "My real mom was a Jew. I am glad I never met her."
Roger and Lynda Cruz adopted Cruz when he was a child. Roger died in 2004, and Lynda died last fall after an illness.
In his first message to the chat group, Cruz bragged about writing a letter to President Donald Trump -- and receiving a response. CNN reached out to the White House for comment about any correspondence to and from Cruz but has not heard back.
Jim Gard, his former math teacher, told CNN's Brian Todd that although he never had problems with Cruz, he did receive an email from a school administrator around November 2016 asking to be notified if Cruz came on campus with a backpack.
In two instances, Cruz also discussed killing small animals.
He posted a photo on his Instagram account of a disemboweled frog, saying he had killed it because one had killed his dog. In the Instagram chat, he describes killing a number of birds with his gun.
Some members of the chat were worried he might have killed endangered animals.
"He seemed nice but also had some mental issues," one member told CNN. "All (I know) is that he likes guns and really hates liberals."

Anonymous Coward #fundie godlikeproductions.com

Millennials Are the Cause of Transgenderism

Millennials is the first generation exposed to constant,
non-stop, 4K-quality porn, and they're also
the culture of instant tinder hookups.

They were already metro-sexual,
which reduces the taboo of transgenderism,
but they've also gotten bored with regular sex and porn.

it's not a coincidence that transgenderism has become
a political issue in tandem with millennials
supporting Bernie.

Some TERFs #transphobia #sexist reddit.com

@VAPORMACHINESLTD2001

Why don't we see FTMs with AGP?
I don't see as many women fetishizing how much they want to have a big fat cock compared to males with AAP.

@hopefull21

I'd say they don't exist, I think the ones trying to become yaoi characters just don't like the idea of dating a straight man because of how they treat women, so they escape through a fantasy where all gay men are cute harmless boys. Some of those get grindr then complain, in their own spaces, that gay men won't have sex with them. They tend to stay in their communities because they aren't predatory and living out a fetish like men.

@Swarlolz

The devils best trick was convincing people he didn’t exist.

@hailcapital

Men and women are physically and biologically different, so there's no reason to expect that the underlying root causes for conditions like these or how the conditions operate are anything alike.

FTMs are also a lot less common than MTFs, I think the ratio is something like 1:3.

There do seem to be paraphilic reasons for transition, tho- in addition to fujoshis / fetishizing gay men, there are places like the subreddit FTMsPunished (don't go there), show paraphilic motivation.

@AcceptableTourist_

Same reason you don't see female transvestites, pedophile rings, etc. - paraphilias are very rare in women, some hypothesize that they do not exist in women at all.

@mushroomyakuza

Judging by r/detrans they also detransition and experience more regret.

@trmta

(For clarity, I’m female + lesbian) i think its due to porn, and i dont really like it, but i have had a gender shift fantasy for years. For a while the only way i could reliably get excited/get off was thinking of myself...not becoming male, but having the male experience i was watching (principally receiving oral)—but only ever with a ridiculously large dick. That in itself would turn me on.

this did make me wonder if i was trans, on top of some other things from growing up.

thankfully though i get that it’s...well, it’s just a fetish.

Edit: I’ll also add that yeah, this seems pretty rare. Ive asked about it and some amount of gay women also project themselves onto the male in straight porn, but i think it was/is deeper for me. Otherwise it very very rarely has come up even through looking. This is actually how i came to learn about AGP kind of organically, rather than through trans discourse. There were AGP forums so i started looking for AAP stuff. Not much out there, iirc.

@FlatCommunication5

“MtF people who transition because of intractable dysphoria but don't invade women's spaces or publicly engage in fetishistic behavior”

Where are they?

“Second, if we can't extend compassion to AGP males, then we drive them straight into the arms of the TRA”

When we aren't looking, they admit they're terrified of liberal women turning on them.

“(Yeah, I get that for any A*P person, transitioning is in some way publicly engaging in fetishistic behavior full-time, but let's acknowledge that there's a difference—in degree if not of kind—between the MtF person who dresses like a normal adult woman and doesn't bother anyone and the MtF person who dresses like a loli streetwalker and bothers incredibly uncomfortable shop attendants for help with bra fittings.)”

What about their wives?

"It's a matter of degrees" meh...

It's just a way to divide women in good & accepting vs bad. What if I don't want this normalized?

This attitude will drive more agps to transition, & not as a last resort. After all, they can rely on the good, welcoming women to tell the hysterical witches to calm down.

good luck expecting a man who has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to transition to not become entitled. After all, if a dysphoric agp shows up in the women's bathroom, the good, accomodating women will tell the others it's better not to make a fuss. Remember, we went from "it's just a poor soul with gender dysphoria" to 9yo on puberty blockers in a nanosecond.

Considering how profitable transitioning is and how accomodating women are - and how diligent they are at disciplining unruly women - what is the incentive for the medical profs to research a treatment for AGP besides transition? There isn't.

@mhd0419

“do you really expect AGP males to care about anything we say”

They don't care about anything we say already.

I respect your moderate, compassionate tone, and practical attitude. It's possible that there is a minority who don't get a kick out of insulting and overly-sexualised porn-fuelled misconceptions about women, but from what I've seen they are a minority. The majority of them are freakish and pornsick, and lack humanity because they cannot see how insulting and harmful everything about their movement is to women.

I am not going to respect ANY of them until they start treating women with respect and advocating for us. Which they have never done and never will do.

Roosh Valizadeh #sexist archive.fo

All That’s Left For Normal Men Are Rotten Women

Nature has given humanity a roughly one-to-one ratio of adult men to women, but the most attractive women are being taken out of circulation to either join alpha male harems or participate in degenerate lifestyle choices. This leaves the average man practically no choice in settling down with a mentally stable and cute woman in her prime.

In Islam, a man is able to marry four wives, which is what my wealthy Iranian grandfather did on his way to siring 24 or so children that included my dad (the exact number is a mystery). He took away three women that an Iranian man of lesser means could have married, creating a societal imbalance, but that’s nothing compared to what we have in the modern Western world, where a single famous man can command the sexual attentions of dozens—if not thousands—of women in their sexual prime, spoiling these women for normal men who don’t have the ability to tingle their vaginas with the same intensity.

How many actors, musicians, and sports athletes are trying to plow through as much prime pussy as possible? How many Hollywood directors and music producers are leveraging their positions for sexual gain? How many club owners, restaurateurs, Arab sheikhs, and politicians are doing the same? Each one is taking way more beautiful women out of circulation than men like my grandfather, all while elevating their standards to such an extent that no average man can ever gain their love, let alone two hours—or even two minutes–of their uninterrupted attention.

We also have to account for female lifestyle choices that are designed to delay or prevent pair bonding and marriage. The biggest is career. Most girls, while embarking on a career, balance out the boredom of working a meaningless job by hopping on the cock carousel and banging at least a few men every year. By the time a girl hits 25 years old, any man who meets her will have to deal with a walk-in closet of emotional issues and hang-ups from being pumped and dumped as much as a 1930’s brothel whore.

Then there is the Instagram and Facebook lifestyle that creates crippling dopamine addiction, which causes a girl to only be satisfied if dozens of men are actively thirsting for her every day. I estimate that if a girl has over 500 followers on Instagram, she is so used to attention from throngs of men that the love of one man cannot possibly satisfy her.
We must also throw in the growing “travel blogger” lifestyle where, instead of using only her body to get attention, a girl uses pictures and video from exotic locations to enhance her beauty. Other girls, with nothing substantial to offer the world, decide to showcase pictures of pets or their tasty overpriced meals, but even that puts them on a dopamine loop that ruins their future interactions with men.

By far, the most damaging lifestyle choice women make is becoming a sugar baby, a politically correct term for “prostitute.” For some easy cash, she whores out her body to the highest bidder (some women combine Instagram and prostitution in a seamless package). How can such an Instagram prostitute ever settle down with a man who has a normal salary? There are also the hundreds of women who enter porn every year, some from seemingly stable families. Sadly, men are so desperate for love that many would wife up a former prostitute or porn star, but it’s highly unlikely those women will make for stable families.

The Western world is a sinkhole for women. The prettiest of the bunch fall into the hole and get spit out years later an entitled #MeToo hag who can never be happy, making the Islamic four-wive rule seem downright egalitarian. The sad truth is that if you meet an attractive girl today, she was pumped and dumped by numerous sexy men, prefers to nurture her career than children, is addicted to attention via the internet, and has participated in some kind of scheme to exchange social status or cash for her pussy. She’s more than suitable for a bit of fun, but would it be wise to seek a relationship with her?

Even with the obesity and short-hair epidemic, I still see a bountiful supply of cute girls I would happily reproduce with. I would love them, let them caress my beard, and lay my seed deep within their vaginal guts, but the problem is that those guts are not for me—they are for the Chads who would never marry her, the beta orbiters who await her newest selfie as if it were a source of food, or the rich and lonely men who would sponsor her for thousands of dollars a month. They’re taking her out of circulation at the time I want her most, and by the time they are done with her, I no longer want her. I guess I’ll try to weasel in a bang or two when she is not yet fully degraded, and enjoy the fleeting pleasure that comes from it as much as I can.

Samuel James #fundie patheos.com

One moment during the lowest point of their journey, when all seems lost in the black ashes of Mordor, Samwise Gamgee asks Frodo whether he can remember the taste of good food and the feeling of warmth. Frodo’s reply has haunted me often:

‘No, I am afraid not, Sam,” said Frodo. ‘At least, I know that such things happened, but I cannot see them. No taste of food, no feel of water, no sound of wind, no memory of tree or grass or flower, no image of moon or star are left to me. I am naked in the dark, Sam, and there is no veil between me and the wheel of fire.”

I don’t think I have ever read anything that more poetically expresses what it’s like to be addicted to pornography than that passage.

Of course, that’s not what J.R.R. Tolkien was going for. In fact, Tolkien never quite fully fleshes out what kind of psychological affect the One Ring has on Frodo or Gollum or any other bearer. In a way, the lack of specific detail enhances the horror of both Gollum and Frodo’s transformations; we don’t know what exactly is going on inside them, but we can hear their cries.

The corrosive effect of porn on the soul is likewise shrouded in that kind of agonizing mystery. As someone who was rescued from severe bondage to porn, I can feel the contrast in my life now versus my life then much more keenly than I can describe it. I feel emotional lightness, I suppose, and I no longer live in that withering dread of exposure that colored every human encounter. But there’s something deeper, something in the inner chambers that seems to be pointed in another direction, almost as if I’d spent my entire life in a basement and have just recently seen through a window.

What does Frodo mean by “naked in the dark”? I’m not entirely sure, but I do know that the metaphor rings true when applied to porn. Porn requires nakedness, and that is part of its appeal, but the nakedness it demands is in the darkness, so that the porn addict can neither see himself clearly or the object of his desire clearly (and those are often the same thing). To be naked in the dark is to be blind and vulnerable, unable to cover oneself because of the darkness, and unwilling to walk into light until clothed.

Interestingly, the One Ring frequently tricks its wearer into thinking that he is the rightful owner of the Ring’s power and is thus entitled to it (this is Samwise’s temptation earlier in The Return of the King). The Ring initially bestows a false sense of glory, but then what happens, according to Frodo? “Naked in the dark.” The Ring promises to make kings but only creates servants.

Pornography’s primal appeal is erotic but its deepest appeal is spiritual. Viewers come for the titillation but they stay for the autonomy, the power to make an alternate reality in which mythological figures (actors and models) submit unhesitatingly. But like the One Ring, this is an illusion, one that conceals porn’s slavish designs. This is one reason pornography is not merely an aberrant species of sex, but something different from sex altogether. Sex, even prostitution, requires reality and knowledge; porn depends on fantasy and ignorance. Like the Ring, pornography promises kingship but delivers only serfdom.

Freedom comes for Frodo after the Ring was destroyed. Tolkien describes the moment right the Ring falls, with Gollum, into the volcanic Crack of Doom:

‘Well, this is the end, Sam Gamgee,’ said a voice by his side. And there was Frodo, pale and worn, and yet himself again; and in his eyes there was peace now, neither strain of will, nor madness, nor any fear. His burden was taken away.

When the Ring was destroyed, Frodo’s enslaved state of mind was destroyed too. So it seems that the nefarious power of the Ring included the eventual melding of its wearer’s mind with the Ring’s own mind. The Ring joined its evil nature to the nature of the One who desired it, so that the fate of the one was connected to the other.

This is true in a meaningful way of addiction. Theologian G.K. Beale has written about a motif in biblical literature whereby those who worship idols eventually become like the idols they worship. The Old Testament prophets seem to believe that to worship a false god is to, in a sense, take on the nature of that god, so that those who worship a god that cannot hear, speak, or move, likewise become deaf, mute, and impotent.

What about those who worship porn? Porn is illusory, and indeed, those addicted to it are often deeply disconnected from reality. Porn is cruel; those hooked on it are frequently manipulative and exploitive of others. And porn is dark, and very many people in its hold live under thick layers of secrecy and isolation.

Pornography is torture. Even in the midst of its most pleasurable delusions, it tortures the mind and spirit. Like Frodo under the spell of the Ring, people trapped in the compulsions of pornography often cannot imagine the tastes and smells and sights of life in the light and the open air, the warmth of existence not shrouded in shame. The Ring could only be destroyed in the place it was made. The same is true of pornography; its shackles can only be undone in the spiritual realm, the realm where the shackles were forged.

Like Frodo, Christ entered the heart of darkness’s domain. He did so for Ring-bearers who couldn’t even take the journey towards their freedom. In Christ the power of sin was destroyed forever so that those united with him can be rid of their hellish burden. “Peace I leave with you,” Jesus said. “My peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your hearts be troubled, neither let them be afraid.”

Richard Holzer #racist #psycho jta.org

A white supremacist has been arrested for plotting to blow up a synagogue in Colorado.

Richard Holzer, 27, was charged for planning to attack Temple Emanuel, a congregation in Pueblo of 35 families whose building dates to 1900.

According to an affidavit describing the charges, Holzer is a self-described “skinhead” and former Ku Klux Klan member who has used Facebook to “promote white supremacy ideology and acts of violence.”

The affidavit describes weeks of undercover work by the FBI leading to Holzer’s arrest on Friday, beginning with an undercover agent making first contact with Holzer online in September. Holzer told the agent he was preparing for a “RAHOWA,” or racial holy war.

In mid-October, Holzer met for the first time with FBI agents posing as white supremacists and discussed his plan to blow up the synagogue. He also gave them white supremacist paraphernalia, including a flag, patches and a mask.

Holzer also claimed to have enlisted a Mexican ally in a scheme last year to poison the synagogue’s water supply with arsenic — he said it led to the synagogue being shut down. But Helena Atlas-Acuna, the synagogue’s board secretary, said the water supply was not, in fact, poisoned.

lukejbarnett2002 #fundie imdb.com

[On Ariel Winter's breast surgery]

How horrible of her to get a breast reduction. this is the worst thing a woman can do to herself. it's slapping God in the face and telling him he was wrong in how he created her. and that was one of the best things about her and one of the most beautiful things about her and that was one of the few things that made her so special and unique and rare and made her so different from all the other girls in Hollywood because her boobs were so big. taking that essential and special and rare thing away is going to make her like all the other beautiful girls in Hollywood. so 1. it's immoral 2. it's unethical 3. dumb for her career and 4. dumb for her beauty. and it's not good in any way. how is it ever bad having beautiful, big boobs? and look at someone who did this, Soleil Moon-Frye, I don't see her anymore, since about 5 years ago and she had breast reduction surgery. and she's doing this now before she's old enough to show her boobs legally???!!! that's horrible, that means we'll probably never be able to see her big, natural boobs. her parents should of made her wait until she is at least 21 before doing this, because then she would've been old enough and mature enough to be intelligent enough to know what she is doing and also then she would've at least had enough time to show her boobs in a leaked and hacked topless cellphone pic like all the girls in Hollywood are getting caught at doing nowadays, what a big, awful shame! Caroline Wozniacki and Simona Halep also suck and are horrible people for getting breast reduction surgery.


and to think I just recently, in the past year discovered her amazingly big, amazingly round, and amazingly beautiful boobs on here. this is the worst thing that a woman can do to herself. it's disrespectful to God. you're saying what God did to create you was wrong. and it's horrible to all her fans and all the many people who want to see her boobs and want to touch her boobs, like all the guys who want to have sex with her in her personal life or people who have seen her in person or in a movie or tv show who want to have sex with her. she's taking away the one thing that really makes her stand out apart from almost all the other girls in Hollywood who are around her age. she's soon going to not be special or rare or unique. she's going be like all the other girls in Hollywood. I really think she should've been made by her mom to wait until she's 21 because then she would've been old and mature and smart enough to realize the weight of this decision and then she would've known how dumb of a decision it is. and also then we would've had the opportunity and chance to see her boobs in a leaked, hacked topless cellphone pic like all the girls in Hollywood are making and getting stolen from them, what a horrible shame! now we'll probably never be able to see her big, round, beautiful natural boobs. as a woman under 18 it's hard to see her boobs in a leaked hacked topless picture or in a movie or tv show, these are all very rare things nowadays. it makes me so sad to think about her lovely, big, beautiful, round boobs going away. but you know what she's not going to have a career after this, because she will then be ordinary and bland. but than again she does have a porn star name so she's already made one bad career and life decision.

and how could she say that she was getting neck, back, and spine pain? I mean it can't ever be that bad. and also it's just like if you have a fat stomach, you work on it naturally until you don't have it anymore. she could've done the same thing with her boobs. and also I just found out that the first part of a woman's body that loses fat when she loses weight is her boobs, and that's why you don't see that many skinny or trim women who have big boobs. so, all she had to do was lose weight and she'd have less big boobs. and about how hard it was to get form fitting dresses and how hard it was to show cleavage being her age? I mean why is it bad to show your big boobs in cleavage revealing outfits when you are a teenager? and how hard was it to have wardrobe make you wear big sweater or strap you into clothes? come on, those things don't sound hard at all. and she had the same boobs size as Sofia Vergara, 32F, and Sofia has had to deal with having really big boobs for a lot longer than you have. if she can deal with it you can, toughen up! I just think it's such a bad thing for a girl to do. and I also think it's a symptom of this generation where people feel and think they can take the easy way out and that they don't have to work or struggle to get anything in life. it's all quite depressing. Sofia should've said no to her doing this, maiming and scarring, and ruining her body and devaluing and disrespecting her body.

Her boobs were amazing because they were so big, bouncy, round, full, succulent, soft, smooth, buoyant, and beautiful. they were special because usually women don't have boobs that big. and I've never understood how a teenaged woman could ever want to take away her natural, huge boobs. and I also have never understood how a teenaged girl with huge boobs would ever go that far, getting breast reduction surgery. I've never been able to understand how a teenaged girl with huge boobs could ever be that much against having huge boobs. it's like they think they can't have boobs that size as such a young girl which is stupid and ignorant and unrealistic and nonsensical.

I know that her boobs are her only value or quality that matters because nothing else really sets her apart from all the other young actresses in Hollywood nowadays, nothing else is really special about her. bottom line about this is she's disrespecting God by doing this, she's saying what you created with me is not right and so I'm going to take it away or change it and that's not right. and also when there's real problems that people have she has to bring up this insignificant thing which proves she's a little bitch. and also it proves that she's one of these rich, entitled, narcissistic Hollywood people who only care about vain, materialistic things. but that's what you get with a girl who has been given everything in life she wants her whole life, a rich, spoiled bitch.

Mark Downey #racist rawstory.com

A white supremacist church leader is feeling emboldened by Donald Trump’s election win — but not bold enough to tell reporters where his group worships.

Pastor Mark Downey, who operates the white supremacist Kinsman Redeemer Ministries, has written an extremely lengthy open letter to Donald Trump that’s circulating on Christian Identity church websites, reported WCPO-TV.

Christian Identity adherents believe, contrary to biblical scripture, that “Germanic, Celtic, Scandinavian and Anglo-Saxon” people are God’s “Chosen People,” and the small but influential religious sect informs nearly all white supremacist and extreme anti-government groups.

Downey, however, sees Trump’s election as an opportunity to enter the political mainstream.

“I am an outsider, about as non-partisan as a liaison with Providence and a potential President could be,” Downey wrote. “Nevertheless, I wouldn’t be wasting my time if there was the possibility that you could be the called out one to lead us out of the terrible mess we’re in.”

The letter, which was written Oct. 9, suggests that “divine destiny” will lead Trump to victory, and he called on the Republican to disavow mainstream evangelical Christianity and endorse Christian Identity’s extremist ideology.

“The wolves in evangelical clothing will not tell you the following things to do, because for the most part, they are shabbez goi, which means they are the lackies for their Jewish masters,” wrote Downey, who essentially encourages Trump to recast himself as a religious leader.

“If you want to make America great again, it is imperative that we isolate ourselves from a world gone crazy,” Downey wrote. “It is madness to impose other morals and values upon this once great Christian nation. Think of it: a White Christian America as envisioned by our founding fathers or a third world melting pot that has no identity, no heritage and thus no future of greatness. No other religion will make America great again. Have you ever heard ‘No King but Jesus’?”

Downey cited anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that influenced Adolf Hitler, whom he’s praised, to beg Trump to crack down on the media.

“You’ve been a media player for years (and) the media is run by the Jews. It goes all the way back to the Rothschilds,” Downey wrote. “It’s a fact, that six Jewish companies control 96% of the world’s media. And boy, do they have an antichrist agenda.”

Although most Americans are unaware of Christian Identity teachings, the sect’s beliefs influence Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazi groups — who have outspokenly endorsed Trump — as well as anti-government militias and the “sovereign citizen” movement.

“Only one race answers to the Holy Bible scenario of Israel in the latter days, and that is the White Race,” Downey wrote.

Downey told a reporter that his congregation met in Florence, Kentucky, although its mailing address is in nearby Alexandria, but he stopped returning calls when the journalist identified his profession.

Another northern Kentucky church, Fellowship of God’s Covenant People in Union, lists Downey as its pastor.

The last time Downey, who claims he ran for state legislature in 1994, got anywhere near mainstream politics was in 2014, when he urged his congregants to cast write-in ballots for a neo-Nazi candidate for the U.S. Senate who also lived in Florence.

ToughTelephone #sexist reddit.com

Actually, no, I won't date or waste my energy on "Trans Men" or "Non Binaries".

That seems to be a way for people to make themselves more palatable to gender believers, to be a 'Good TERF' - "it's just Trans Women I have an issue with, I'd totally date a Trans Men or Non Binary Person, I fight for them too". Well, not me.

Are they biologically female? Yes. Have they also chosen to massively and offensively degrade biological femaleness and throw all other women under the bus because they are Not Like Other Girls 2.0? Yes.

I'm a lesbian, I'm also a working class second generation Desi immigrant. I have no time for these people that are overwhelmingly White and seemingly entirely middle class or rich. Nor do I see it as safe to encourage or shame women into dating them under the "well technically" guise and I can only imagine so many people here do because they never have and have no real intention of actually doing so - or else you might actually realise how emotionally and homophobically abusive that situation is to lesbians, to be expected to include in their dating pool people who actively disparage and disown the very idea of femaleness.

These people are just as dangerous as the Trans Women this sub discusses. Maybe not to you with the luxury of Whiteness or middle class opportunities, but to those of us that are poor or non White? Women who are struggling to survive off of food banks, single mothers trying to raise children while their benefits get taken away, girls who cannot go to school because they do not have menstrual products, WOC navigating a racist Western society and their own ethnic communities, we literally do not have the time or resources. It is specifically our rights and our voices and our safety as poor women and WOC that are ignored and are the first to be sacrificed. And not just by Trans Women, by Trans Men and Non Binaries too, because they all want to take our places in organisations and divert attention and funding away from us in favour of themselves, and none of them will ever understand what it is to be us. Especially as we are under represented in this conversation anyway because we are under represented full stop and aren't the ones being transed in huge numbers - if you are a poor woman, especially poor WOC, you know that's what you are, you know you cannot identify out of that because the rest of the world makes sure you know. But yet there are plenty of people on this sub who would berate us for not supporting our "sisters" who are so comparatively privileged and self-obsessed they had to make up an oppression to feel special and would have the nerve to say that the women working three jobs, these mothers struggling to support their children, these girls who can't afford school supplies, victims of forced marriage etc., are the real privileged ones.

No. Just no. Maybe you can afford to fight that fight and if so go ahead, that's your prerogative. But the sheer racist, classist gall you have to have to try and tell other women that we should too lest be we be bad women or bad feminists.

Tobias Langdon #transphobia #wingnut #racist #pratt #dunning-kruger unz.com

image

Sex and race are, to the left, mere social constructs, abstract systems of delusion and injustice that can be overturned by human will and social engineering. It follows, then, that leftists will support and celebrate men who reject the social construct of sex and claim to be women. And leftists do support and celebrate such men.

Triumph of the Trannies

It also follows that leftists will support and celebrate Whites who reject the social construct of race and claim to be Blacks. But leftists don’t support and celebrate such Whites. Quite the contrary. While Bruce Jenner, a man claiming to be a woman, is worshipped and rewarded, Rachel Dolezal, a White claiming to be a Black, is ridiculed and punished. Steve Sailer and others have drawn attention to this contradiction, but I don’t think they’ve properly explained it.

Why do leftists cheer when men cross the border between the sexes, but jeer when Whites try to cross the border between the races?

I pose those questions deliberately in that form to draw out the links between the left’s love of transgenderism and the left’s love of open borders. The Jewish libertarian Murray Rothbard (1926–95) described this aspect of leftist ideology very well in this passage of an otherwise long-winded and boring essay:

The egalitarian revolt against biological reality, as significant as it is, is only a subset of a deeper revolt: against the ontological structure of reality itself, against the “very organization of nature”; against the universe as such. At the heart of the egalitarian left is the pathological belief that there is no structure of reality; that all the world is a tabula rasa that can be changed at any moment in any desired direction by the mere exercise of human will — in short, that reality can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings. (Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, Modern Age, Fall 1973)

Rothbard was right in general about leftism, but failed to explain that highly significant exception: why does the “exercise of human will” allow Bruce Jenner and others to become women, but not allow Rachel Dolezal and others to become Blacks?

Sex and race are both aspects of reality, but the left believes that only one of those aspects “can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings.” Why so? I would explain it by supplementing Rothbard’s explanation. Yes, he’s right when he says the left have a magical belief in the reality-transforming power of “human will,” but he doesn’t discuss what happens when there is a clash of wills.

The high and the low

Let’s look at transgenderism first. Men like Bruce Jenner and Jonathan Yaniv (pictured) have “willed” that men can become women and must enjoy unrestricted access to all female spaces. At the same time, some women — the so-called Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists or TERFs — have “willed” that men can’t become women and must keep out of female spaces. There is a clash of wills that is settled, for the Left, by the status of the opposing sides. In leftist eyes, the men have higher status than the women, which is why the men’s will prevails and the women’s will is rejected. But hold on, you might be thinking: How can the men have higher status than the women in leftist eyes? It’s easy: the transgender men have cleverly aligned themselves not with men in general, who are indeed of lower status than women, but with homosexual men, who are of higher status than women.

Trangendered men are part of the “LBGTQ+ community,” which lifts them above women in the leftist hierarchy. Take Jonathan Yaniv, the perverted and probably Jewish male, who claims to be a woman and has been suing female cosmeticians in Canada for refusing to wax his fully intact male genitals. If Yaniv spoke the truth, he would admit that he is a heterosexual male who seeks perverted sexual pleasure by passing himself off as a woman and receiving Brazilian waxes or entering female toilets to share tampon tips with under-age girls, etc. Obviously, then, Yaniv can’t admit the truth. Heterosexual men are wicked in leftist eyes and are well below women in the leftist hierarchy. Heterosexual men definitely cannot pass themselves off as women in pursuit of perverted sexual thrills.

Actual authentic lesbians

Yaniv and other “trans-women” must therefore align themselves with homosexuals to pass leftist purity-tests. As trans-women they claim to be members of a sexual minority, which triggers the leftist love of minority-worship. Indeed, Yaniv and some others go further than simply claiming to be women: they claim to be actual authentic lesbians. A pinned tweet at Yaniv’s Twitter account states that he is “One proud lesbian. I’ll never give up fighting for human rights equality. #LGBTQoftwitter.” Yaniv isn’t a lesbian, of course. Real lesbians — that is, real women who are sexually attracted to other real women — quite rightly reject fake lesbians like him, so the fake lesbians exploit leftist ideology again and accuse real lesbians of bigotry and hate.

Feminism has the concept of the “glass ceiling,” whereby women are unjustly prevented by sexist men from reaching the highest positions in politics, business and academia. Inspired by this, the fake lesbians have invented the concept of the “cotton ceiling,” whereby men like Yaniv are unjustly prevented by real lesbians from removing the underwear of said lesbians and having sex with them. Here is a trans-lesbian activist lecturing a sceptical TERF (i.e. Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist for those not up on the latest jargon) on the injustices of the cotton ceiling:

Trans women are female. When our female-ness and womanhood is denied, as you keep doing repeatedly, that is transphobic and transmisogynist. As I said earlier, all people’s desires are influenced by an intersection of cultural messages that determine those desires. Cultural messages that code trans women’s bodies as male are transphobic, and those messages influence people’s desires. So cis queer women who are attracted to other queer women may not view trans women as viable sexual partners because they have internalized the message that trans women are somehow male.

The comparison to what cis males say also makes no sense. What trans women are saying is that we are women, and thus should be considered women sexually, and thus be considered viable partners for women who are attracted to women. What cis males are saying is that queer women shouldn’t be exclusively attracted to women, which is completely different. (The Cotton Ceiling? Really?, Femonade blog, 13th March 2012)

It’s not “completely different,” of course. In both cases, people with penises are “saying” (and willing) that real lesbians should have sex with them. In both cases, real lesbians would be encountering the male genitals of real men. But the trans-activist believes in an act of verbal transubstantiation whereby a trans-lesbian possesses a “female penis” that, despite all appearances, is “completely different” to the nasty and objectionable penis of a “cis male.”

Aspects of religious psychology

I use the term “transubstantiation” deliberately. It’s a term from Catholic theology that refers to the supernatural process whereby wafers and wine transform into the flesh and blood of Christ during the celebration of Holy Eucharist by a priest. No physical or scientific test can detect this transformation, and to all appearances the wafers and wine remain unchanged. But traditionalist Catholics will insist that the wafers and wine are now truly Christ’s flesh and blood. If you disagree, you’re probably safe nowadays, but you wouldn’t have been in the past. It was very unwise to openly deny, let alone ridicule, transubstantiation in Catholic nations during the Middle Ages. And disagreements over the concept were central to the murderous hatreds of the Reformation. Those who believed in transubstantiation got very angry when it was denied.

This anger, which is part of the odium theologicum, is an important aspect of religious psychology, whether overt or covert — leftism can in fact be explained as a mutation of Christianity and Judaism. Overt and covert religions gain power by demanding belief in things that defy everyday reality, because such belief is difficult and requires a greater emotional investment. When we invest more in a belief, we have more incentive to protect it more strongly. And it is precisely because concepts like transubstantiation and the “female penis” are absurd that they are powerful. When we have an emotional investment in something we can’t prove, we react strongly when it is denied or ridiculed. That applies even more when we ourselves are subconsciously aware or afraid that our beliefs are baseless or false. Crushing external heresies can be a way of stilling internal doubts.

The “female penis” vs the “unisex brain”

And so religion and other forms of ideology can gain power by their contradictions and absurdities. However, in the clash between transgenderism and feminism, both sides believe in absurdities: the trannies insist on the concept of the female penis, just as the feminists insist on the concept of the “unisex brain,” namely, that there is no genuine difference between male and female brains. These two concepts are both biologically absurd: there is no such thing as a female penis, but there is such a thing as a female brain. However, if transgenderism and feminism are both powered by absurdities, why have trannies been winning the battle over the TERFs? Well, it’s partly because the trannies have the bigger, and therefore better, absurdities. For example, the “female penis” is an obvious absurdity, the “unisex brain” is much less so. Penises are out in the open, after all, whereas brains are hidden behind the skull.

And there is a continuum between a typically male brain and a typically female brain that doesn’t exist between male genitals and female genitals in the vast majority of cases. The psychological differences between men and women are a question of averages and tendencies, but the physical differences are generally stark and obvious (inter-sex individuals are rare). A certain group of trannies also have the stronger male will-to-power and love of battle, which is another reason they are winning the battle with lesbians. All this explains why the left supports and celebrates trannies as they cross the border between male and female. As a sexual minority, they have higher status than ordinary women. As a novel and exhibitionist sexual minority, they also have higher status than lesbians, who also have less will-to-power.

Better than Black

Indeed, as I pointed out in “Power to the Perverts!,” transgenderism has allowed some White heterosexual men to leap above the Black-Jewish lesbian feminist Linda Bellos in the leftist hierarchy. The White men are “transgender” and Bellos, although Black, is a TERF. In current leftism, transgender trumps TERF. Leftists therefore support the border-abolishing White men and not the border-erecting Black woman.

However, leftists would instantly support Bellos if those White men were claiming to be Black rather than female. Leftists want the border between male and female abolished, but not the border between Black and White. Why so? Again I would argue that higher and lower status settle the clash of wills. Rachel Dolezal “willed” that she was Black, while Blacks “willed” that she wasn’t. Dolezal was trying to abolish a border, Blacks were trying to maintain one, so a naïve reading of leftism would say that leftists should support “trans-racialists” like Dolezal just as they support transgenderists like Bruce Jenner. But leftists didn’t support Dolezal, and Blacks easily won the battle of wills. The border between Black and White stayed up, and Dolezal was ridiculed and punished, despite being more convincing as a Black than most transgenderists ever are as women.

{Submitter’s note: Langdon rants on and on… see the source link if you’re really interested about the rest of it}

scythian #racist whitakeronline.org

That White people can’t ever see themselves as aggrieved IS White Supremacy. And I doubt non-whites will ever give up this belief.

Bob [Whitaker] has said that Hitler was a Jewish Supremacist – Jews were to blame for all problems, inherently evil, super humans in the bad sense. Jews were the problem, so Jews had to go.

You heard in Horus’ radio interview the recording of Obama saying: “White folks greed runs a world of need”. Is this not akin to what Hitler said about the Jews?

I’m going to assume since Abe Lincoln is Obama’s boy that he’s said many times: “All men are created equal” – how can you believe this & blame the world’s problems on a small global minority that is our race? That’s double think, and White Supremacist anti-white hypocrites of the same mindset will call us “White Supremacists” for pointing out the obvious simple realty that the Third World is the fault of Third Worlders.

What Obama said is White Supremacist, a lie, and an incitement for GENOCIDE.

If I went around saying: ‘Jew folks greed runs a world of need’, I’d be put in jail in Europe & Canada, financially ruined in the U.S. at the least – the Western versions of the Gulags. What if I convinced everybody that indeed the Jews were the cause of all the world’s problems? The Jews would be finished. White Supremacy says that you can say anything about White people & we can never be harmed; but people must be put in jail for saying “harmful” things about non-whites; and Whites must protect non-whites from other whites – the oft used excuse for whites killing a hundred million whites in the civil war & WW2 +.

And ‘White Power’ by definition means that anti-white white traitors have the power to subject their own race to an ongoing GENOCIDE.

The anti-white system is predicated on bullshit/double-think, “anti-racism” propaganda is get white people not to care about race – well if you don’t care about race then you don’t care about white genocide. And the deeper reality is that whites are “racist” if they don’t care about other races and “racist” if they care about their own race.

So I don’t think White Supremacy is dead, I think we are killing it because not only do we HAVE a grievance, we have the greatest grievance of all time.

Perhaps HD can write a petition asking Obama to renounce his genocidal statement; point out that Holder saying “white people don’t have civil rights” shows that U.S. “civil rights” laws break the international genocide law of denying group defense.

Marcus Cicero #racist dailystormer.name

The Daily Stormer’s brilliant tactic of pressuring the subversive Jewess MP Luciana Berger through social media protest seems to be bearing some fruit, with multiple news outlets screeching at a level that we can only regard with laughter, contempt, and pride.

Operation Filthy Jew Bitch, a textbook example of free speech and White outrage over the slimy persecution of National Socialist Patriot Garron Helm, has driven the Christ-killing destroyers of Britain into a rage that borders on the absurd, and exposes the mentally-deranged psyche of the Jewish mind.

Several Labour party members, including the “mystery meat” Ebola vessel Chuka Umunna, have voiced their support of the Communist parasite, tweeting recently that,”Luciana Berger is one of the most hard working MPs and a superb Shadow Minister. We will not stand for the anti-Semitic attacks on her,” while the Liverpool Echo has made the ridiculous assertion that Berger is in fear for her personal safety due to our non-violent offensive.

Liverpool Echo:
"Sick online trolls have launched a campaign of racist hate at Wavertree MP Luciana Berger.
Merseyside neo-Nazi Garron Helm was jailed this week for sending “abusive and upsetting” anti-Semitic messages to Ms Berger, but white supremacist supporters have hit back with a coordinated campaign of abuse.

There are now serious concerns over Ms Berger’s safety, and the ECHO understands the Metropolitan Police are investigating after dozens of vile messages were sent to the MP.

A right-wing website is even advising its followers how to abuse Ms Berger online – launching a campaign called ‘Operation; Filthy Jew B****’.

Owner of the site, American Andrew Anglin, told his supporters to tweet Ms Berger from anonymous accounts."

The Jewish Chronicle has also joined in the screams of indignation, claiming that a picture of the Parliament Parasite imposed with a yellow “Jude” star amounts to “abuse,” and that young Helm’s entirely factual statement against Berger’s vile Marxist ideology falls under the definition of “obscene.”

BNP members are also being alleged to have taken part in the internet bombardment, a definite sign of progress if found to be a truthful assertion.

[...]

All in all, a very satisfactory beginning to the operation, although much work still remains to be done in this department. Those who possess active Twitter accounts should continue to taunt the hook-nosed female rodent, while fresh recruits or blocked members can set up a simple profile in the space of a couple of minutes.

Let those who wish to stomp upon and obliterate your ancient rights hear your voices loud and clear. No Jewish invader can possible silence the White majority of the Western World, and no amount of pathetic mewling will stop us in our efforts.

Garron Helm deserves his freedom and public vindication in the eyes of ordinary Britons, who know only what the degenerate media spews forth on a daily basis. There is no middle ground or compromise on this issue.

Mike King #racist tomatobubble.com

The forbidden truth regarding the history of global genocide against ancient Aryan peoples is an "open secret" for anyone willing to do some basic research. From India to Central Asia to Germany, ancient Mongols, Turks and Huns have murdered or enslaved millions of Eurasian Aryans while destroying their artworks and centers of learning. North American Native legends (as well as archaeological evidence) strongly suggest that a “War on Whites” also occurred in North and Central America, long before Al Sharpton, Barack Obongo, Eric the Red Holder, and 'La Raza' came along.

This all makes for fascinating history, but that’s not the purpose of this piece. What is, you ask? To quote the Spanish philosopher George Santayana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” It's reality check time folks! The various fair skinned peoples are once again being targeted in an unmistakable “War on Whites” which is being orchestrated by Zionist supremacists; a Caucasian subset which seeks to be the only Caucasian race in town.
It is not for nothing that a Jewish playwright named Israel Zangwill coined the term “The Melting Pot”.

The Zio-Globalist goal is to “blend” out and eventually, by instigating other races, kill out the last of the Aryans / Whites, especially those of the purer Nordic variety. Oh you foolish, deluded liberals of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Britain, Canada, Germany, Holland and American Suburbia! You pathetic and undeserving heirs of the great Viking bloodlines. Can you not see that your good and gentle natures are being skillfully used against you in a Judo-like (or shall we say 'Jewdo-like) fashion? Can you not see the bold-lettered obituary written on the wall of your future? Can you not see the bewildered and desperate faces of your own unborn grandchildren (what few of them there will be) cowering on those Peruvian and Iraqi mountain tops?

[...]

Tolerance and respect for other peoples and cultures does not mean that the descendants of Europa should dismantle their own cultures, finish off their bloodlines, and turn over their nations to Jewish Supremacists and their unwitting third world shock troops. God forbid! You see, those high-sounding platitudes about "multi-culturalism" and "tolerance" and "diversity" are really not about "love". Not at all. No, the anti-White agenda is all about HATE!

The intensely racist Jewish Supremacist has always been consumed with a malevolent envy of Aryans. Jewish Supremacists also believe that with "the evil White Man" gone, they will more easily lord over the "schwartzas", browns and yellows; all of whom they look down their lying hooked noses upon.

Unless “dumb blonds” (a Jewish Supremacist slur!) and others of the European Family wake up and bloody damn soon, the last pure remnants of today’s childless, ageing, decadent and "diversifying" Western Aryans could, within a generation or two, find themselves holed up in the mountain tops of the Rockies and the Alps - just like the terrified Chachapoyas of yesteryear, and the terrified Yazidis of today. Alarmist you say? The Yazidis of Iraq and the Cloud People of Peru must have once thought so too; to say nothing of the 400,000 dirt-poor White South Africans now languishing in the decrepit squatter camps of the very nation their ancestors built.

Wake up Whitey. Off of your knees and wake up!

biblicalgenderroles #sexist biblicalgenderroles.com

While most married men view porn you may directly contribute to your husband viewing it more by neglecting your physical appearance. If you gain an excessive amount of weight or fail to properly groom yourself or wear nice clothes your husband may look more to porn than he normally would for the feminine beauty that he is naturally designed to crave.

Even if you take great care about your physical appearance if you are harsh, critical, disrespectful or less than fully receptive to your husband’s sexual advances he may view more porn than he would have otherwise. Most women fail to realize that men do not view porn only because of the bodies of these women or the sex acts themselves. Many men also view porn because of the enthusiasm these women show toward sexually pleasing the man they are with.

Even if you as a Christian wife take great care of your appearance and you willingly and enthusiastically have great sex with your husband he may still look at porn. I refer you back to hard truth number 2 about men and their sexuality – men are designed by God with a capacity for polygyny. So this means even if your husband is thrilled with you in all these areas he will still be drawn to enjoy the view of a variety of women’s bodies.

Even if you deny most or all of the hard truths I have just stated the Bible nowhere gives you the right to deny you husband sex because is he doing something sinful. Remember that the same Bible which you believe says men viewing any kind of porn or thinking sexual thoughts of other women is wrong also says very clearly that a woman may not deny her husband sexually.

Even if you deny most or all of the hard truths I have just stated your husband is NOT accountable to you for his thought life or his actions. Even if you feel he is being disobedient to God in his porn use you are not his spiritual authority and you have no authority to confront him in this spiritual matter.

AnonAutist #sexist incels.co

What would foids choose?

image

transcriptchoose a bf

boy 1:
6′3
- part of "the boys"
- ALM
- plays sport
- extrovert

boy 2:
5′10
- feminist;
- BLM
- does not play sport
- introvert

@hellolizzie888:
boy 2 does not exist

Most foids will hate that they are inherently drawn to #1.

vintologi_se #transphobia #sexist #crackpot #quack docdroid.net

(This is from “Transmaxxing Manifesto”, the whole thing is 36 pages of PDF so there’s a lot of insanity there, this is just a small part.)

People improving their lives by transitioning is a beautiful thing

Usually when someone live a shit life as a male he will just complain about how women are unfair to him or he will spend his time on various copes such as videogames and anime.

It's very rare for miserable males to actually improve themselves via medical transition, it usually takes pretty bad gender dysphoria for them to actually take action and even then many fail to act in time.

1.Males transitioning to female makes the world more beautiful (less disgusting males).

2.People that transition and become beautiful benefit from it

3.people around them will see them improve instead of suffering or killing themselves.

4.males that transition are politically useful for my goals (maybe also your goals).

5.trans girls are high in demand and can allow cis lesbians to have biological children with a partner they find attractive.

6.voluntary chemical castration makes a male less likely to hurt other (and himself in the process).

I find it strange that people rarely object to psychiatry that outright harms people and costs billions of dollars each year but they complain about the government helping trans individuals transition even though it's one of the few mental health interventions that actually works.

Forced feminization

A lot of individuals cannot make it as males and will thus be forced to live as female or suffer the brutalsocial consequences of being male, this is especially true for females with gender dysphoria, they mightnot like their female bodies but medical transition would still be a disaster for them.

Most males are no longer needed in our modern society, technology has made name strength mostly obsolete and most males do not have any mental abilities not commonly found in females. Less than 10% of males are needed for sex and reproduction, most males are just a burden to society and thus we need to increase the number of males that transition to female, especially individuals who would clearlybenefit from changing their biological sex.

Most males hold into their male pride but that will soon crash down as females raise their standards (because they can) and even more males lose their jobs to automation.

Currently forced treatments are justified by "danger to themselves and others", you do not need to be convicted of an actual crime. If we are going to treat people against their will that shall include HRT.

A nurse will regularly visit your home. Your pants will be pulled down and soon you will feel a needle inside your muscle and soon the injection, estradiol valerate, it will be slowly absorbed by your body.

At first it was just pills given orally, now it's injections and at this point hiding the breasts is very difficult. The estrogen will make you more emotional and thus you will probably start crying due to theintense humiliation you received by the new government controlled by believers of vintologi. You crying and begging will of course not stop the nurse from doing the injection.

After a while you will stop resisting and accept your face as a girl. It will become increasingly difficult to hide what's happening to you, your breasts getting bigger, face feminized, brain feminized. Once you have been forced to be on HRT long enough there will not be much left of your old self, the hormones have changed your brain beyond recognition and now there is no longer any going back, not only do you look like a girl now, you are now also like a girl mentally.

There are a lot of males who would benefit from transitioning but they are not willing or able to actually transition, this can be due to social factors but in most cases the issue is ignorance, people simply don't know what's best for them. It's a difficult and scary decision to make to start HRT and this is why a lot of people fantasize about forced feminization, often they try to brainwash themselves via sissy hypno porn.

Chemical castration drastically reduces testosterone and thereby sex drive, sexual desires and aggression. Thus a lot of males that are currently dysfunctional in our society would become functionalif they start on HRT, this would allow them to avoid being jailed

Child molesters have drastically low recidivism rates when chemically castrated (1-4%) vs non castrated (40-65%)

https://www.wfsbp.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Treatment_Guidelines/Paraphilias_Guidelines.pdf

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2764552

Currently just being suicidal alone can warrant forced treatments by harmful and dangerous psychiatric drugs, forcing some males to take hormone replacement therapy can thus be justified in an attempt to prevent them from killing themselves using the same standard.

Innate gender identity?

Studies on intersex children show that about 40% will identify as female when raised as one, thus gender identity is only partly due to genetics

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421518/

This tells us that a lot of people are able to adapt to living as either sex, the brain is flexible and we can adapt to a lot of things. Whether or not an individual will transition is only partly determined by genetics (33% in the case of MtF)

http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/2010to2014/2013-transsexuality.html

Matt Forney #fundie returnofkings.com

It looks like the Southern Poverty Law Center, one of America’s premier ethnic shakedown organizations, is running low on donations again. This week, they announced the new edition of their “hate group” list, a record of supposed white supremacist, far-right terrorist organizations operating in the United States. Most notably, Return Of Kings has been added to the list as a “male supremacy” organization, alongside men’s rights’ group A Voice For Men:

Also, for the first time, the SPLC added two male supremacy groups to the hate group list: A Voice for Men, based in Houston, and Return of Kings, based in Washington, D.C. The vilification of women by these groups makes them no different than other groups that demean entire populations, such as the LGBT community, Muslims or Jews, based on their inherent characteristics.

This isn’t the first time that ROK publisher Roosh has been targeted by the SPLC: in 2012, he was named in one of the organization’s “Intelligence Reports,” alongside A Voice for Men and my old site In Mala Fide. Roosh later cited the experience as the final push that moved him to the dissident right.

It’s clear that the SPLC is going after AVFM and ROK in an attempt to scare liberal old biddies into giving them more money, because their attack was sloppy and poorly-handled. For example, the SPLC claims that ROK is headquartered in Washington D.C., even though it’s a website with no physical address or full-time employees.

Most hilariously, the SPLC’s dossier on alt right figure Richard Spencer confused him with Robert Spencer, the founder of Jihad Watch, suggesting they outsourced the research to a stupid intern.

Having said this, the SPLC’s attack can’t be handwaved away. Much like the Anti-Defamation League, the SPLC’s purpose in naming organizations as “hate groups” or individuals as “extremists” is designed to incite violence against them. Ever since the election of Donald Trump, the left in America has become increasingly violent, and the SPLC’s list is a dog whistle to antifa and other groups with the intent of hurting or possibly killing Roosh and other targeted individuals.

How The Southern Poverty Law Center Fuels Leftist Violence

The SPLC, ADL, and other related organizations like to masquerade as legitimate news organizations who are merely calling attention to violent, anti-government extremists, but this is as far from the truth as possible. In actuality, the SPLC functions as an intelligence-gathering operation for antifa and other violent leftists, compiling dossiers on chosen targets with the implicit message of, “It’s okay to hurt, maim, or kill these people: they’re Nazis/misogynists/homophobes, after all.”

“Hate group” lists compiled by the SPLC have been used by leftist criminals in the past to identify targets for assassination. For example, in 2013, a left-winger committed a mass shooting against the Family Research Council after seeing them named by the SPLC as an “anti-gay” group. More recently, we’ve seen leftists openly going after Republican politicians and public figures, such as the attempted assassination of House Majority Leader Steve Scalise by Bernie Sanders supporter James Hodgkinson.

This is not the first time that figures in the dissident right have been targeted in such a way. Last summer, the ADL released a hit list of alt right and alt lite figures such as Mike Cernovich, Richard Spencer, and myself, with the purpose of inciting violence against us. In response, Cernovich and several other alt lite figures launched the #ADLTerror hashtag on Twitter with the intent of bringing attention to the fact that their lives were now in danger.
Lies, Damned Lies, And Lists

Moreover, the SPLC can’t even be consistent with the criteria it uses to evaluate “hate groups.” In response to their attack on A Voice For Men, ex-feminist filmmaker Cassie Jaye (creator of the documentary The Red Pill) revealed that in 2016, the SPLC told her that AVFM didn’t fit their criteria for a group since they lacked an “official group policy,” due to the fact that AVFM was just a website and a forum. The SPLC has not yet revealed to Jaye why they changed their policy.

Regardless, it is clear that the international left is ramping up for a broader attack on the dissident right. While the alt right was the focus of much of the left’s ire last year, the movement has been weakened due to systematic deplatforming, failed stunts such as Charlottesville, and personality conflicts between its major leaders. As a result, the left now feels confident in going after sites like Return Of Kings that had previously been out of the line of fire.

Dissident right and alternative media figures should prepare themselves for an onslaught from the globalists in the coming months. With the 2018 midterm elections coming up and the Russia investigation in the U.S. unraveling, the left is looking to strike out at anyone who challenges their power or narrative. As the SPLC’s actions show, they are not above physically hurting or killing their enemies to achieve their goals.

sadoeconomics #fundie archive.is

: Do you think we should put people in prison for getting caught with snuff films and gore like we do for child oorn? They're all psychos who need to be locked up before they hurt someone imo


Wow did you ever pick the wrong tree to bark up here my friend
I’ve probably got at least a gig worth of gore shock images on my hard drive as well as a far greater amount of BDSM porn that’d freak out most normal people
Also I don’t even think child porn should be illegal and I’m pretty sure I’ve defended that position here before but I’m always happy to do so again
It’s been shown again and again that if there’s some correlation between having some antisocial mental condition and seeking out violent/sexual/etc media the causation runs backwards from what you’re implying - people who were born with a problem express that through their media choices, rather than the consumption of media causing the issue. Meanwhile enormous numbers of perfectly sane and harmless people enjoy violent entertainment and pornography for their entire lives and never hurt anyone. The state should simply never be allowed to ban any sort of media at all - no exceptions.

FaceandHFD #quack #kinkshaming #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Blackpill] Digital Cuckoldry

Porn, onlyfans and orbiting thots on social media are the digital cuckoldry plaguing our society. It's not healthy for men to be ejaculate to pixels. The coomer meme was right and men should be publicly shamed for watching porn. From a Freudian perspective, sexual gratification through digital means is completely pathological and creates widespread neurosis and social retardation. Men should only be content with cooming inside civilian women or prostitutes. Therefore, there needs to be some sort of organized counter-revolution to digital degeneracy that pushes for the ban on porn and online sex work.
image

TranscriptLeft:
Illustration from a 19th Century anti-masturbation tract depicting a masturbator as a drooling imbecile with the swollen tongue hanging out.

Right:
A grotesque slavering creature tries to put a square peg through a round hole. The puzzle is mounted on a wall bearing the PornHub videos.

Heading:
“The Cumbrain:
. Burned out his dopamine receptors
- High Prolactin Killed his motivation
- Hypofrontality
- Lost free will to extreme reinforcement of a primal drive. Slave to sexual distraction.”

Next to the creature:
“Measurable brain damage”

On the creature’s forehead:
“no longer creative
just thinks about sex 95% of the time”

Next to the puzzle:
“Impaired problem solving”

Closing line:
“Don’t let this be you. Stop before its too late!”

AfrikanCel #sexist incels.co

Why women can't be authority figures

The largest fundamental hormone that separates male and females is testosterone. Testosterone increases muscle mass, to make you more physicially imposing, but also deepens your voice.

Women and children sound basically the same as neither voice has broken like a man has. That is the reason why people simply can't take a woman as seriously as a man. It is part of the reason why I personally lack respect for a females opinion, besides their lower IQ and stupid interests.

I simply can't take a woman seriously.
Their annoying childlike high pitched voice (literally hurts my voice) means I avoid media that includes them and if I can I skip scenes involving females. I even watch porn on mute because I do not want to hear a harpy.

When women speak I get flashbacks to when I was bullied. When women try to give their opinion on matters, I get flashbacks of when they would analyse me and direct slurs.

Foids are like children. 0 responsibility thanks to whiteknights.

reptoid puncher #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

One of the many vile things reptoids do when they latch on to humans is the manipulation of their hosts natural instincts - one of which happens to be the one that causes causes sexual attraction. (This by itself isn't a bad thing as it's required for us to exist as a species - this is the way God intended it). Reptoids when latched on to humans are known to manipulate the sexual instinct of their to cause obsessive, bizarre sexual behaviours, some of which are sexual obsessions.

Porn actors are 100% victims of reptoid infestation. This is proven by the fact that normal humans do not want to be seen in the nude by strangers. Yet under the influence of the reptoid parasites, they willingly strip in front of the film crew and perform sexual acts with a comlete stranger - almost as if they were doing it with lawful spouses in the privacy of their bedrooms. The reptoids have turned porn actors into mindless drones. Eventually the porn actors, as hosts, lose their souls and the reptoid being take over their bodies completely.

Porn addicts are also victims of reptoid infestation. The reptoids have convinced an entire generation of hosts that obsessive "fapping", porn collecting is absolutely fun and healthy.

Deviant sexual behaviour is also 100% the result of reptoid manipulation of human instinct. This applies to everybody involved in homosexuality, transvestism, bestiality, pedofilia etc. Sex in nature is solely between male and female; this is true across all animal species that are comprised of male and female members. The parasitic reptoids have the ability to re-program their hosts natural sexual settings, causing deviant sexual behaviour.

Why are reptoids doing this? They do it because of their dark natures and hatred for humanity. Reptoids desire to corrupt humanity and remove them from God, our Defender. Reptoids are also known to use human hosts to corrupt others. The elites (who themselves are reptoid hosts) use pornography and free-sex ideologies to break down the family system and in turn society itself. This is why everything from movies to music to advertising is hyper-sexualized. We are living in an age where large parts of the population are hosts to reptoids - this is the closest we are going to come to a zombie apocalypse.

some TERFs #sexist reddit.com

The glaring difference between the definition of "male" and "female" on Medicine Net

image

(totalrando9)
It's funny... until you realize that young women are being pressured to 'define their gender' and 'decide what pronouns to use.' As the qualifications for 'being a woman' get more obscure and complicated, women will be pressured to dis-identify with the label 'woman.'

What's even worse is that this is supposed to be a medical definition of 'female' - they aren't even limiting their revisionism to 'women' anymore.

(XXisBornFemale)
Men are human.

We are non men.

We are whatever men say that we are. Men define us. We will never be permitted to define ourselves.

(raddy-set-go)
Scrolling further down that very same page:

" Women should be aware that they metabolize a number of drugs differently than men. In some cases and for some medications, the rate of metabolism may be slower, and in other cases, faster. It is, therefore, essential that women are well informed about the kinds and correct dosages of any drugs they are taking. "

But I suppose one can just "identify" out of those differences nowadays

(exhaustedstudent)
A great example of the way that society defines male as the default and woman as some sort of “variation”, which in turn opens the door for every other thing not defined as clearly male to come under the female umbrella.

(TerribleConfusion)
Wow, the thought police truly DGAF about trans men. So much of this movement is purely about sheltering and validating the precious, precious egos of narcissistic transwomen.

I'm thinking also of Cancer Research UK who changed all the wording on their website associated with cervical cancer and other women's illnesses, and left the wording on the men's cancers intact and straightforward.

Anyone got other instances like that? From this thread it seems like the Wikipedia page history for "woman" would be another good example of this. A few years ago the problem with that page was that it was full of misogynistic slurs listed as "synonyms" for "woman" while the page defining "man" was straightforward and scientific. It really does sometimes seem like the trans activists have stepped in to take over where the openly misogynistic dudebros have left off.

various commenters #fundie reddit.com

Asian guys admits: "My beautiful Chinese girlfriend gets approached by some American men and they say. 'But your boyfriend has small penis. Trust me. I'm better than him.'". WMAF is built on hatred & disrespect. ALL WMAF contributes to this. Which is why no WMAF should be given the benefit of doubt

(NAITNC)
This is why we need more Jeremy Longs out there. The vast majority of white men = ~ 5 inches. This is proven shit. https://calcsd.bitballoon.com/

The only reason WM think like this and say that shit is because porn forms their opinions. The reality is, most WM are small as shit compared to porn stars. I wonder which group has a more accurate frame of reference regarding this, WM whose source of info = porn, or gay men and promiscuous women who consistently say that most men are average, with no racial distinctions by size.

Then again, there's really no difference between WM benefiting from the exclusive use of hung guys in porn, and their benefiting from the top 1% men in Hollywood representing them. It's just sad that the general public is too impressionable to see through this subtle form of propaganda.

(asian-man-throwaway)
The average for white men is 5 inches, not the median. There's a difference ??

So while a significant amount of white men have average length penises, it's probably not the "vast majority" (even though it probably is a normal distribution).

My point is that for every white guy with a big penis, there's one with a micropenis. And while I obviously can't prove it, I'm more inclined to believe it's white guys with tiny penises who shit on Asian men the most so that, in their heads, they're at least better than somebody. So think about that the next time you see a white guy talking about Asian penises.

(8MonkeyKing)
If it's a white guy, standard answer should be "if I wanted a big penis, I would go with a black guy so no thank you". Let's see how these racist WMs deal with that. Use their own stereotypes against them.

(WuKaiHo)
Okay can we get some constructive discussions out of this post? What would be the correct methods for the Asian guy to respond in these situations?

(jermul714)
What I do is casually but publicly challenge them to whip their dick out so that we can compare penis right there, but require it has to be in front of everyone to verify the account. This can go one of two ways, either they accept your challenge or don't.

If they accept the challenge, then maybe you win, maybe you lose. If you're packing anything even close to average, then you will just be living up to what people expected anyways, and at least you had the confidence and balls to challenge them. Remember that confidence and the willingness to defend oneself are much more attractive than a big dick. But fortunately, I've never actually had to do this because...

They 100% always decline the challenge. Think about it. It's a lose/lose proposition for them. To them it's akin to playing basketball against a girl. When you beat a girl in basketball, it's nothing special because you were SUPPOSED to win. But if you LOSE to a girl, that is straight mortifying (at least to a person who overcompensates by talking about other peoples dicks). And if the Asian guy is so willing to compare his junk against yours in public, maybe he's packing something to be afraid of. Every single time the offender called me some sort of crazy, but the people who witnessed my challenge knew I wouldn't put up with that kind of shit and would always be left wondering what size my dick really is.

disclaimer: I always made sure I would only challenge this way against those I knew who would decline. Some dudes are crazy or inebriated enough to accept the challenge, so don't be reckless if this kind of thing would embarrass you. Read body language and social cues. The key part is the challenge anyways, and there are plenty of other ways to challenge people that don't involve you actually whipping your cock out. Recognize this for what it is, a war of words. No penii ever actually cross tips in the war of words (pun intended), but Asians are often losing by not even showing up to the fight.

(bionicj1052)
I believe behind all this bullshit of Asian men have small penis, white men is most afraid of Asian men(intelligent, wealth, mostly grown up in steady family, etc) in society, small penis shit is only thing they can say to put Asian men down.

(guitarhamster)
Even IF whites have bigger dicks (which they dont according to statistics), if that is the only thing they can offer, that is pretty sad. Also what woman would actually leave her boyfriend for another guy just because of dick size? Lol

(redmeatball)
white men are obsessed with asian penis. I wonder why that is?

(whitemoddetector)
This is why when you speak to AF, you have to talk shit about WM to remind them of thier faults (in certain situations only) Talking shit is a two way street, do it back

(evilsalesguy)
Asian need to rock the boat more, I got the small penis stereotype in college on a few occasions from people I don’t even know. So now, every time I talk about white, i mentioned that they are psychopaths. If the white dude is in Asian, I would add loser or pedophile in there.

(whitemoddetector)
In Jt trans article he literally had a woman in his arms, and a white guy went up to him and said "what are you doing with this Asian guy with a small penis" he got cockblocked right there and the woman left him. This is the type of shit you have to deal with so you better learn to talk shit back. No woman will stand by a silent push over. WM are actively preventing women from being with you so do it back. It's a no brainer

Joseph Schmitz #racist rawstory.com

One of Donald Trump’s top foreign policy advisors is trying to wrest control of a Montana dam from two Native American tribes as part of a bizarre anti-Muslim campaign.

Joseph Schmitz, an attorney and former Pentagon inspector general, was tapped as one of Trump’s five foreign policy advisors last month, along with a bewildering mix of conspiracy theorists and “third-rate people.”

Schmitz served as co-counsel in a lawsuit filed last year on behalf of Montana State Senator Bob Keenan (R-Bigfork) and former state Senator Verdell Jackson (R-Kalispell) asking a court to block the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes from taking over management of the former Kerr Dam, reported the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights.

The dam, which was built in the 1930s on tribal land, was renamed the Seli’š Ksanka Qlispe’ dam when the tribally owned Energy Keepers, Inc., paid nearly $18.3 million to NorthWestern Energy to acquire it.

That’s when things got weird.

Schmitz, who’s an “insider” with the right-wing Newsmax website and senior fellow at the virulently anti-Islam Center for Security Policy, and fellow co-counsel Lawrence Kogan filed a lawsuit seeking to block the transfer — which they argued posed a national security threat from Turkey.

The attorneys claimed the dam transfer would allow the Turkish government and terrorists to obtain nuclear materials, although they were unable to provide any factual evidence of their claims.

Turkey is an American ally and member of NATO, and the U.S. State Department considers the nation a key partner in its counterterrorism efforts in the Middle East.

“The nonprofit Nuclear Threat Initiative says Turkey is active in nuclear proliferation prevention efforts and is a member of all major treaties governing the acquisition and use of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons,” reported the Associated Press.

The claims are based on conspiracy theories about the Turkish Coalition of America, a nonprofit lobbying group that has been working to establish an agricultural trade relationship with Native American tribes.

Schmitz and Kogan, who boasts ties to the right-wing Citizens Equal Rights Alliance, warned that Turkey may be trying to “promote their brand of Islam” on reservations and produce yellowcake uranium using tribal resources.

“It is quite possible that the Turkish government, sponsored Turkish business enterprises, and affiliated terrorist groups or members may be seeking access to such expertise for possible acquisition and use of incendiary devices to compromise Kerr dam and/or other off-reservation targets,” the lawsuit claims.

Schmitz and Kogan voluntarily withdrew the lawsuit in October after they were unable to provide evidence of their claims about a terrorist alliance with Native Americans.

The lawsuit, and Trump’s embrace of Schmitz, highlights the links between anti-Muslim conspiracy theorists and efforts to strip Native Americans of their rights, property and heritage.

CERA, which essentially challenges Native American rights as unconstitutional, and its longtime leader Elaine Willman are part of a continuum of bigoted crackpots who promote white supremacist and other extremist fringe views through Tea Party organizations and on right-wing websites.

That’s the mindset Trump is bringing onto his foreign policy team.

Schmitz himself has written frequently about his fears of sharia law, multiculturalism and political correctness — all personal bugaboos for Trump — and has argued that Americans who receive public assistance should be barred from voting.

“Multiculturalism, political correctness, misguided notions of tolerance and sheer willful blindness have combined to create an atmosphere of confusion and denial in America about the current threat confronting the nation,” Schmitz wrote.

Trump’s anti-Muslims views are well known, but he doesn’t much like Native Americans, either.

He’s fought against the right of tribes to establish casinos under the 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and he’s complained for years about his competitors in that business using racist remarks.

Trump, of course, is a huge fan of the Washington NFL team’s racist nickname.

“I know Indians that are extremely proud of that name,” he said. “They think it’s a positive.”

cinderchild #sexist feministcurrent.com

This is a really great article about how "terf" has become not only a slur but hate speech but you left out a huge part of the problem that TRAs have with women: lesbians. Lesbians are one of the most vulnerable groups of women already and the vitriol hurled at them for being lesbians is disgusting. Lesbians who acknowledge that a lesbian is a female homosexual, and only attracted to females, is automatically branded a "terf" because TRAs have decided that lesbians are attracted to gender, not sex.

This happens to lesbians who aren't radfems or even gender critical; they're lesbians who seek out females and they are punished for that. There are so few lesbian spaces anymore, having been invaded by TIMs who say they are lesbians and therefore lesbians must consider them viable partners. Lesbians are called bigots for exercising their right to be a female homosexual who is not attracted to males and simply saying that they are not attracted to TIMs brands them "terfs". See Riley J Dennis. While this article was great, leaving out lesbians is a huge disservice to them.

Lesbians endure more than their share of hate piled on them simply because they don't see TIMs as viable dating or sex partners because lesbians are not attracted to males. The transactivist movement is not only incredibly misogynist but also incredibly homophobic by telling lesbians that if they don't see TIMs as women they are disgusting bigoted terfs, and they must consider TIMs as partners because "trans women are women". It's quite akin to corrective rape. I realise this is kind of rambly and out of order, I'm extremely tired right now but wanted to get these thoughts down before I forgot.

WikiLeaks #racist dailydot.com

image

...

"The Wikileaks account subsequently tweeted some explanations of what the offending tweet meant, suggesting that “neo-liberal castle creepers” had appropriated the racist-turned-anti-racist solidarity gesture, turning it into “a tribalist designator for establishment climbers.” A clarifying tweet also misspelled “gesture” as “jesture,” which further stoked accusations of witting anti-Semitism.

...

Wikileaks ultimately defended the decision to delete the tweets, saying they’d been intentionally misconstrued by “pro-Clinton hacks and neo-Nazis.” It’s also been maintaining a pretty aggressive public relations posture regarding these latest leaks. It threatened MSNBC host Joy Reid for tweeting that she planned to discuss an “affinity” between the group and the Russian government on her show, saying “our lawyers will monitor your program.”

...

So, again, not the best tone for a group dedicated to prying open closed organizations, regardless of their desires. It also responded to an article by Talking Points Memo’s Josh Marshall, investigating alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Vladimir Putin, accusing him of “weird priority” for focusing on the method of the correspondences' release rather than the data dump itself."

Dailyantifeminist #fundie dailyantifeminist.wordpress.com

The whole rise of the modern “boyfriend and girlfriend” thing is not healthy for society. It allows women to engage in the practice of “serial monogamy,” which is their preferred method of realizing their hypergamous sexual strategy. It also prevents normal family life, because formal marriage implies a commitment to a shared household, unlike bf/gf-ism. Feminists want to prevent normal family life from being the norm in society, because they want women engage in careerism, which is also why Feminists advocate so strongly for prolonged ‘education’ for the females; what the Feminists seek is to destroy the family for the purpose of making society a more “comfortable place” for their mutant androgenized-dyke lifestyles. Therefore, Feminists are very fine indeed with the modern situation of widespread bf/gf-ism. These female mutants hate the formal institution of marriage for a reason.

(In a previous post I wrote that I don’t seek to de-humanize the Feminists, but you know what? I’m gonna de-humanize the shit out of them)

While there is no reason to be principally opposed to all bf/gf situations, and while bf/gf situations in some cases may lead to marriage, the truth of the matter is that a strong marriage culture is vastly superior to the current state of affairs. In a society where formal marriage is the norm, we know which woman belongs to which man, and so women can’t play their manipulative tricks on society – their power is diminished when sexual anarcho-tyranny of gynoicentrism is replaced with a pro-male sexual order. Formal sexual order in the form of marriage cuts through the bullshit of women, whereas the informal bf/gf-ism situation with which we are now dealing makes it all too easy for women to determine how the sexual landscape would look like; the results are not pretty, to say the least, with widespread involuntary celibacy, skyrocketing divorce rates when marriage does occur, and an overall feeling of sex-based antagonism between men and women – a “sex war” by any other name. I believe that to win the sex war, we men must institute a formal sexual order in lieu of the current sexual anarcho-tyranny, and that means that marriage — be it monogamous or polygamous — must become the norm.

I consider monogamy to be vastly superior to polygamy, because in a monogamy each man gets laid, while in a polygamy only some men get laid. And monogamy has to be Patriarchal, which means that — essentially — women must be made to serve men, the heads of the household; it is men who organize society itself, because we are capable of doing that while women aren’t, and we certainly should be the organizers of our own families. And additionally, marriage has to be young; I think that the average age of marriage should be 10, meaning that many marriages will occur at considerably younger ages than that. A society with young, Patriarchal, and monogamous marriage as the norm is infinitely superior to the current situation of old, non-Patriarchal, and “serially monogamous” (not actually monogamous) bf/gf-ism being the norm.

Women should by-and-large be married and thus propertized, and the minority of chronically un-married women should serve as concubines, harlots, and pornstars, contributing in this way their services to us. Of course, some wives may also do prostitution and porn, with permission from their husbands. That’s not really advisable, because cuckoldry is something that most of us are upset about, and so child prostitution and child porn — occurring in before marriage, which, again, will be at a young age — may become more prevalent. A 7-year-old un-married pornography slut may get some hot jizz on her face in front of the camera, then settle down at the age of 10 as a housewife, and from then onward only ride her husband’s cock. I support that.

Rusty Benson #fundie afa.net

[On how porn makes everyone a sex offender]

For example, serial killers Ted Bundy and Gary Bishop both confessed to porn's dominating power in their lives; a 20-year FBI study indicates that 81% of sex murderers name porn as their most significant sexual interest; police investigators routinely find porn in the homes of sex crime suspects; and a study by the Los Angeles Police Department of more than 40 child molestation cases found that pornography was a factor in every single case.

XDISCIPLE #conspiracy xdisciple.wordpress.com

[This guy seems to believe that Katy Perry and Zooey Deschanel are the same person, who is also porn star Ellie Idol, and it's a big conspiracy or something. Also, Heath Ledger and Joseph Gordon-Levitt, apparently...)

The first observation we should make is that the actor who plays Katy Perry also plays Zooey Deschanel. Apart from the obvious resemblance, their connection is revealed through both Gordon Joseph-Levitt (who dated Zooey Deschanel) and Russel Brand (who first hooked up with Katy Perry and then with Zooey). Both Gordon Joseph-Levitt and Russel Brand are fake personas. Zooey is most likely an earlier role for this actor, with the pertinent episodes of her life and film career shot earlier than would appear to us, because of other obvious differences related to the fireworks mentioned above. I think it is more shocking that this actor’s handlers would think that bust size alone would preclude us from making the connection that they are the same person… how shallow do they think we are? I mean, haven’t they seen Your Highness (2011)? Zooey’s performance in her more recent movies (like My Idiot Brother) is rather muted and almost seems like there is something not right with her…

So, working backwards, we can trace Katy Perry back to Zooey Deschanel. That’s not so bad, it’s not a crime for an actor to play multiple roles, unless the intention is subvert our liberties or affect our minds in a negative fashion.

But like the Angelina Jolie and Lady Gaga characters, we should be aware of the negative aspects of the entertainment industry to which this actor has been exposed, and to which I have alluded to and sifted through in earlier posts like parts 1-5 of Hollywood is Just a big Escort Service for the Elite.

Zooey Deschanel used to play the role of Ellie Idol.


[And from the comments section: "People have been saying Cobain is Rivers Cuomo for years. Lots of info out there about that, looks on to me. I think DGB said Kurt played Sid Vicious too, not sure if I see that. Kurt was usually the shortest guy in pics, and Syd the tallest. Did watch some video of Syd, and it's obviously a big act."]

Corey Savage #sexist returnofkings.com

10 Feminist Fantasies That Could Become A Reality In The Near Future

Corey is an iconoclast and the author of ‘Man’s Fight for Existence’. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature.

Around 2013 when I first discovered the manosphere, I knew things were bad in our society in terms of sex relations along with the corroding effects of feminism. But at the time, I didn’t appreciate just know how bad. In just few years since then, I’ve seen enough madness to know which direction we’re headed and it doesn’t look good. We already live in a feminist society and the harpies are pushing to make things even harder for ordinary men who just want to get on with their lives. The following will demonstrate what will happen to our society if we were to give into all the demented demands of today’s feminists.

Although this article is meant to highlight the craziness of it all, note that many of these concepts are already starting to take shape in our societies to become a reality.

1. Expansion Of Hate-Crime Laws
image
“You can’t save Mary Jane anymore, Spiderman. It’s ‘benevolent sexism’, and therefore, a misogynistic hate-crime.”

In England, trying to pick-up a woman or even just whistling at her is considered a “hate crime” if the woman gets upset by it. It is a real possibility that this law might spread to the rest of the West and expand to include other misogynist offenses including: looking at a woman (what feminists call “stare rape”), calling a trans-woman a he (there’s already a similar law in New York), arguing with women online, manspreading, mansplaining, helping a woman, and so on.

2. Consent Forms
image
Since women get to dictate the terms of all sexual interactions, consent forms will have to become a necessity in the future. And not just for sex, but in all forms of interaction like being able to approach a woman on the street. Maybe an app will be developed where a woman could consent to sex, conversation, or being looked at so that she could screen out all the low-life misogynists who want to compliment her for her looks.

3. Anonymous Rape Accusations + 100% Belief In Woman’s Testament
image
All men are rapists; we need to believe her because she’s a woman. It’s a perfect circular logic.

Feminists claim that the reason we live in a patriarchal rape culture is because our society discourages rape victims (always women) from coming forward and also because their words are not taken seriously. So, what they’re proposing is clear: rape accusations should be done anonymously and the “victims” should always be believed against evidences that are biased because… patriarchy.

Men have already lost their jobs, kicked out of school, jailed, and even murdered for false rape accusations while their accusers faced no legal consequences (and got to keep their anonymity). So, we’re not really that far from reaching that level.

4. Feminist Re-Education Camps
image
This book is not a mandatory reading in kindergartens yet. What more proof do you need that we are all oppressed by the patriarchy?

With feminism taking over the educational institutions and already working to reprogram men to serve the system, it won’t be long before men who have been found guilty of misogynist hate crimes to end up in re-education camps. We already have sensitivity training in jobs while colleges are adding courses on toxic masculinity to re-define what it is to be a man on feminist terms. It probably won’t be long before “toxic masculinity” is added to DSM as a mental disorder (in place of homosexuality) and treated like a disease in mental health institutions.

5. Government-Sponsored Feminist Tribunals
image
Canada already has an actual social justice tribunal.

Since it’ll be difficult to charge men of bogus hate crimes against women with nothing more than a woman’s feelings as a proof, the government may introduce tribunals similar to the kangaroo courts in universities and HR departments at workplaces, all in the name of creating a harmonious society free of hate. Those who enter these tribunals will also be destroyed by the media and have no chance of being employed and be subject to permanent social ostracism even if they’re found not guilty.

6. Systemic Castration
image
As I’ve mentioned in my other article, docile and compliant dogs are the ideal that feminists aim for in their efforts to domesticate men. A significant number of boys are already on ADHD medication to have their behaviors controlled while male sex offenders are given chemical castration. If all men are violent hooligans and rapists as some feminists claim, then the next logical step is to let the government control men’s testosterone levels to an “acceptable” level. Note that we already have many parents who are letting their children take hormones to alter their “gender.” This practice will likely become more common in the future.

7. Non-contact Sex
image
“She did not consent; I must not touch.”

Feminists have been so effective in terrorizing the beta males that many of them are afraid to interact with women in any shape or form. Consider that we already live in a world where walking past some deranged woman will get you accused of sexual assault. In the future, all physical contact with women may become sternly discouraged or even forbidden that more men will retreat to porn and sexbots as alternatives. Haptic technology for sex is already being developed to pave the way for a culture of non-contact sex.
8. Bachelor Tax
image
Did you think you pesky “MRA’s” could escape the gynocentric order by refusing marriage and going your own way? With the drop in number of men who are manning up that coincides with the rising number of single mothers who need to leech the welfare state, it’s not too unreasonable to expect a push for bachelor tax that will penalize men who refuse to put a ring on an aging, post-slut sow.

Knowing that it will cause a major backlash, the bachelor tax will probably not come into being in an obvious way. Instead, it will be introduced under the guise of supporting the poor single mothers and helping to foster families. Heck, considering how men are the primary tax payers while women are the primary beneficiaries of the welfare state, you could say that we already have a gynocentric taxation system in all but name.

9. Polyandry
image
Women already practice ‘Alpha fucks, Beta bucks’ strategy. So why shouldn’t an empowered woman be allowed to do it openly without shame?

With the institution of marriage already destroyed and with many men already accepting cuckoldery as the norm in the form of “open marriage,” women may as well be allowed to have multiple husbands. And why not? We already know that there are far too many men for the number of women in our society and that those lazy men should do more to support women. Is it that crazy to have one husband for sex and another three for money? I’m sure many desperate simps will have no issue sharing a wife with several other men as long as they get some cuddling action when she’s not too busy banging her more attractive husbands. The implementation of bachelor tax, mentioned above, will also make marriage more desirable.

10. Concentration Camps For Men
image
The final solution to the testosterone problem.

If the above measures to protect women and ensure equality are implemented, it’s likely that all the misogynists will grumble in anger and resist them. If that is the case, it might be best to take the advice of the feminist, Julie Bindel, and place all men in concentration camps. No man, no problem! If you’re wondering how feminists could even achieve this, know that there is already an army of goons called the police who will gladly do as they’re told to maintain the gynocentric order.

Conclusion

As I’ve said in an older article of mine, feminism is practically a terrorist movement that demands more and more political, social, and cultural oppression of men for the sake of radical women who play the eternal victim and cry for never-ending privileges. While you may think that the above nightmare scenarios are over-the-top and unlikely to happen, I bet those who lived just few generations ago couldn’t have imagined what we’re witnessing today either. Feminism, by colluding with the government, will continue to grow like a tumor and it will not stop until you make it stop.

Remember that if we don’t fight back, no one else will.

Rainyiceberg #sexist reddit.com

How do you cope with living in this horrible male infested world? I hate how men and patriarchy are the cause of all evilness towards women, animals and the planet and yet nobody recognize it!!! My happiness is almost gone because I found out how horrible the prostitution and porn industry is, but everyday I see people who watch porn and some acquaintances talk about it (even females) like if it was normal and funny.

I feel so alone, I have no feminist friends in my country neither online and I think I will always be alone sorrounded by males and handmaidens and there's nothing I can do to change society on my own. Men have indoctrinated women into thinking their own oppression is sexy and normal, and some women even like BDSM and porn and their sexual desires are based on porn and not in what they really want because porn is all about pleasing the dick, not about female pleasure.

Men trained women to like being submissive and serve men sexually and women think they like that. Everyday I find out about more horrible things that men do to women, like the pedophile elite, the oppression in music and film industry, the rape culture, the horrible inhumane conditions of women and girls in many countries, men kill them for not having sons, for not wanting to be with them, for resisting abuse, they control every aspect of their lives, they kill baby girls, they force the abortion of baby girls, they deny education to girls and force actual female children to marry men, legally!

They mutilate our genitals, they call us witches they throw acid at us they see us as sexual holes to fuck, they sexually abuse us, they call themselves women bc they have a "lady brain", they want to have sex with their own daughters, they shame us for having sex, they indoctrinate us to think we are inferior with their religions, we always fear to be raped when we're alone, men control the political and economical elites, they are trafficking us to sex slavery, they exploit us in the most horrible ways and they have the society tell them it's ok for a man to go to a strip club but it's BAD for a woman to be a stripper and bad to be a prostitute, and it's not cool for a woman to go and see naked men dancing or hire a male prostitute, that's just for high class women before their wedding.

The hipocrisy and the oppression is so evident and yet everything is so normalized and nobody cares about it. Even feminists are defending porn and ignoring important issues. I am so tired. Sorry for the long rant and for the english if it's not correct, if anyone can tell me how do they cope, what do they do to feel better that will help a lot. Thank you.