Similar posts

Arthur Gordian #elitist #racist socialmatter.net

A Brief Defense Of The Hereditarian Caste System

Returning to the topic of Indo-European mythology, there are two distinct ways that Indo-European societies organize themselves. The first is by means of caste, which Georges Dumézil defines as an order built on the concept of function. He argues that the Proto-Indo-Europeans organized themselves into three groups, the famous trifunctional hypothesis of Priests, Warriors, and Laborers, and that this caste system evolved into the various manifestations we see from India to Ireland. While there were numerous permutations of this system, each changing in some way the specific character of the castes, the same foundational rules applied across the board, namely that society should be divided along the lines of the function men play in the maintenance of order.

The alternative method of organizing society, also indigenous to Indo-European societies, is the class system which dominated the post-Medieval world. The major distinction between class and caste is that class system organizes people by socio-economic status rather than social function. What one does in society does not matter in a class system. What matters is the amount of wealth and status you can accrue from your function. Members of the upper class can be politicians, businessmen, or generals, but these roles are insignificant to the class system. It is certainly true that upper-caste members tend to be wealthier than lower-caste members in traditional economies, but the material differences are incidental to the caste system and central to a class system.

In Dumézil’s Mitra-Varuna and his two volume work on Ancient Roman religion, the author shows the conflict which emerged in the Roman Republic when the class system began to eclipse and replace the ancient religious caste system. Like most European religions, especially among the Germanic peoples, the priestly caste was largely absorbed into the warrior caste and retained only ritualistic significance, which Dumézil traces in the various priesthoods of the Monarchy and Republican period. What distinguished the Romans was the rise of a system where men were divided into socio-economic classes, such as the Senatores, Equites, Proletarii, and so forth. While there were hereditary roots to these classes, after the Republican period they were primarily economic, as the poet Juvenal tells us:

Would you not like to fill up a whole note-book [of satirical writings] at the street crossings when you see a forger borne along upon the necks of six porters, and exposed to view on this side and on that in his almost naked litter, and reminding you of the lounging Maecenas: one who by help of a scrap of paper and a moistened seal has converted himself into a fine and wealthy gentleman? – Satire 1

Juvenal’s complaint should sound familiar to modern ears: unscrupulous foreigners who lacked any respect for the Roman virtues or laws usurped the positions of power, authority, and wealth from the native Roman population. The openness of the Roman system, which transitioned toward the class structure after the Servile Wars in order to permit qualified plebians to serve in high military office, allowed the complete disenfranchisement of the Romans themselves.

…when a guttersnipe of the Nile like Crispinus —-a slave-born denizen of Canopus —-hitches a Tyrian cloak on to his shoulder, whilst on his sweating finger he airs a summer ring of gold, unable to endure the weight of a heavier gem—-it is hard not to write satire. For who can be so tolerant of this monstrous city, who so iron of soul, as to contain himself when the brand-new litter of lawyer Matho comes along, filled with his huge self; after him one who has informed against his noble patron and will soon despoil our pillaged nobility of what remains to them—-one whom Massa dreads, whom Carus propitiates by a bribe, and to whom Thymele was made over by the terrified Latinus; when you are thrust on one side by men who earn legacies by nightly performances, and are raised to heaven by that now royal road to high preferment—-the favours of an aged and wealthy woman? – Satire 1

As hard as it is to tear ourselves away from the masterful writing of Juvenal, let us return to the point; the openness of a class system, which reduces all social order to that of wealth and popularity (to which Juvenal has more to say, but I’ll desist), creates the opportunity for the erosion of social values and cultural goods by removing one of the core limits on superbia, the overweening ambition of the opportunist.

The rise of the low-caste man to a position of absolute power is bad enough, as history has demonstrated, but the greater danger is that such a society is a magnet for every two-bit con man and grifter across the globe. People with no attachment to the land, culture, or society can use class systems to free-ride on the cultural and social capital of a well-ordered society until even the greatest community is brought down under the overwhelming weight of parasitism. Rome became that magnet, attracting the scum of every corner of the Mediterranean to pull down the greatest civilization before our own. When wealth alone determines social status, anyone willing to violate the norms and unspoken rules governing society can elevate themselves, because when their actions transform society into a cesspit of corruption and despair, they can simply pick up again and move on to the next target. The weight of social disapproval, which ensures a functional society’s consuetudines et usus, the unwritten customs, values, norms, and beliefs which undergird social order and protect against anti-social disruption, does not function on the alien. Cicero declared the fundamental character of a community to be a common language, common “ius[1],” and common weal. There is no common language, “ius,” or weal in the Rome Juvenal is portraying to us, and that is largely due to the Roman class system.

Thus, we return to the notion of caste, in which function and heredity primarily determine one’s social position. I am under no delusion that I am a “secret aristocrat,” as the liberal slur goes. My heredity is pure redneck back over five hundred years. Under a strict hereditarian system, I would most likely be prohibited from receiving enough education to read Juvenal. Nevertheless, the reactionary in me says that my personal situation is irrelevant, and I ask of my reader to keep that in mind themselves as they read the following. If I must be a farmer in order that my people should be free and my children be assured a place, no matter how humble, in their own homeland, then that is a price I am willing to pay.

No functional society is possible without a hereditarian caste system. The arrogance and superbia of Man is such that there must be hard, unbreakable limits on personal ambition, along with strict disincentives to opportunistic parasitism. I am not saying that there cannot be any movement, or that every son of a farmer must be destined to farm forevermore. Even Plato did not suggest this. Every system has some level of flexibility, both ethnic and caste. It is no coincidence that English populations on the borders of the Danegeld, Wales, and Scotland show DNA markers for Nordic and Celtic genotypes. Nor do I deny the various Ciceros and Charles Martels who rose from middling ranks to preserve and protect their homelands. However, the flexibility inherent in any caste system is a weakness in the armor of a nation, and every exception to the rule justifies the waiting masses of alien grifters, who undermine the whole of social order for the material benefit of himself and his tribe.

Hereditarianism is perhaps the most important safeguard to any society because social stability rests on consuetudines et usus, unwritten norms and ethics tied to particular ethnic and cultural groups. It is no coincidence that Ethnic and Ethics arise from the same Greek root. One does not routinely scam one’s neighbors because they are kith and kin; their essential connection to you is the bond and guarantee of equitable relationships. We mourn the day when “a man’s handshake was his bond,” but that handshake wasn’t the true bond. The bond, (in legal terminology, the collateral of a contract) is the reputation one has in the community, which is built upon common heredity. Honor matters because it is the mark of approval from the community that one abides by the unwritten rules which make society spin. The alien neither has honor, nor cares for honor, because he does not care for the community with which he shares no blood.

In any caste system, the alien is either the lowest caste or outside the system altogether. The merchant, who surrenders his identity for a cosmopolitan existence, is also low on the scale, even when he shares blood with the community. This is because a caste system is a fundamental barrier to dyscivic practices and free-rider scenarios, and these two groups have the most to gain from undermining the system and replacing caste with class. When wealth replaces blood, who becomes the highest members of society? It is no coincidence that the word “liberal” was nearly always preceded by “bourgeois” until the 20th century; they are the beneficiaries of the replacement of the medieval caste with the capitalist class system. Likewise, the replacement of caste with class is the only means wherein the alien will be permitted to rise in status over the native-born.

Caste and blood are the only protection that native-born labor have against oppression and loss of self-determination–hence the traditional support of the rural working class for reactionary politics. The upper-castes, the priesthood and aristocracy, are limited in their oppression by those very customs which make society run, but the alien landlord or banker is not so constrained by the cultural limits on power and is free to grind the working classes into dust. When a reactionary says, “neither capitalist nor socialist,” it is a recognition that both are symptoms of the same social breakdown.

The destruction of social order epitomized by the English Whigs and the resultant socialist working-class backlash to an out-of-order bourgeoisie have their roots in the rejection of the role of blood and heredity in determining a social order. Bourgeois rebels against custom and order create socialist rebels by destroying the functional limits on power in society which rested in the hereditary aristocracy.

There is a price to be paid in personal liberty for a caste system, true. I would never be allowed to become a scholar in a society where heredity ruled. The other option, however, is this:

Then up comes a lordly dame who, when her husband wants a drink, mixes toad’s blood with his old Calenian, and improving upon Lucusta herself, teaches her artless neighbours to brave the talk of the town and carry forth to burial the blackened corpses of their husbands. If you want to be anybody nowadays, you must dare some crime that merits narrow Gyara or a gaol; honesty is praised and starves. It is to their crimes that men owe their pleasure-grounds and high commands, their fine tables and old silver goblets with goats standing out in relief. Who can get, sleep for thinking of a money-loving daughter-in-law seduced, of brides that have lost their virtue, or of adulterers not out of their teens? – Satire 1

[1] It can mean law, justice, or Right. In this situation, it probably means all three.

Kevin Rigby Jr. and Hari Ziyad #racist racebaitr.com

We want whiteness banished to history—to an other-space of that which is unknown and impossible. There is no way in which whiteness can move that is freeing or liberating for Black people, so there is no way for white people to free or liberate.

Whiteness is indivisible from white people. To identify as white is to claim the social structure of whiteness, is to always wade in the waters of anti-Blackness. Sociologist Anthony Giddens criticizes our general conceptualization of social structure for having “a tendency to view structure and symbols as somehow alien to the actors who produce, reproduce, and transform these structures and symbols” (The Structure of Sociological Theory, Turner 1991: 523). It is this tendency that so easily clouds our understanding of whiteness and motivates us to embrace white allyship. Black liberation would mean the destruction of whiteness, but whiteness is upheld by all white people. White people cannot escape upholding it.

Constitutive of progressive white people and spaces has always been the question; “How can I, as a white person, work affirmatively in the struggle for Black liberation?” People have engaged this question as a genuine possibility throughout history; of there being a way, however not-yet-understood, for white people to do whiteness well, and, in doing so, aid Black people in getting free. But on a very real level, Black liberation would radically necessitate the refusal of anyone knowing themselves as white. It would mean the actual end of white selves, including the well-meaning white selves seeking the answer to how they can address racism. Black liberation means that white people can only destroy their own whiteness or be destroyed with it. White people cannot exist as white and do anything to address racism, because whiteness in action is racism.

But as much as this argument is a stance against whiteness, it is also a deep affirmation of the totality of Blackness; a declaration that Blackness is enough. More than considering the place or non-place of whiteness, we are concerned with the dream-work of Black folks, that reflexive work we do and have always done trying to better know how to love and be with and in community with ourselves and each other. That work has forever been Black, has never needed whiteness, has best succeeded when we refused whiteness.

There is no answer to the question of what white people can do for Black liberation, but racism veils reality so easily and efficiently. It is anti-reality. It makes the impossible seem not only possible, but a worthwhile endeavor. It truly does keep you, as Toni Morrison said, “from doing your work. It keeps you explaining, over and over again.”

The dilemma of what white people should do to address racism has the same exhausting function of racism, because this dilemma is racism. Because for white people “to do” anything means that whiteness must be centered in a way that would perpetuate its oppressive essentiality.

There is nothing redeeming or redeemable about whiteness—by definition. Only the radical negation of it is helpful or freeing. And it is not enough for us as Black people to encourage or allow white people to try their hand at addressing racism. It is necessary instead to adopt a politic of exclusion. This is to build upon Malcolm X’s claim in The Autobiography of Malcolm X that “Where the really sincere white people have got to do their ‘proving’ of themselves is not among the black victims, but out on the battle lines of where America’s racism really is,” (X, Haley 1964: 383–384) with the vital understanding that Black victims exist everywhere whiteness does.

Therefore, white people should move comfortably in neither Black spaces nor white spaces. Even those who are well-meaning should drive themselves into the ground trying to figure out how to occupy a positive whiteness—because it is impossible. Only in this frenzy, when the sense of order that is critical to whiteness turns to chaos in every place, can the motivation to destroy it overcome the compulsion to reform it.

Contending that whiteness has no value or role in the struggle for Black liberation is an immense claim, but it is a necessary one if we are to be free. The sooner we take seriously that Black people are the best articulators, dreamers and fighters for the future in which we are liberated, the closer we are to the manifestation of freedom. Important to remember is what is made possible for Black people, is made possible for all people. There is no need to consider how whiteness can operate in this. It can’t. It shouldn’t. It won’t in any future in which we are free.

The question of “doing whiteness well” is a question which centers a discussion about Black liberation on the actions of white people. We know that white people maintain hegemonic presences in all institutional forms of power. So, to have a conversation about white people working for Black liberation is to have a conversation predicated on the need for white people to wield institutional power and influence to help Black people. In this context, white people maintain systemic power, and Black people are the recipients of their benevolence. That white people might maintain power in shaping and dreaming up Black liberation is counterrevolutionary. Black liberation must always center on the assault against and defiance of these institutions. “We do not negotiate with terrorists.”1)

Indeed, when we’ve seen white people try to do whiteness well, try to operate their spheres of power and influence well, we’ve also seen the martyrdom of Black women murdered by police to bring white people to reckon with their sins. We’ve seen white men starting campaigns professing the beauty of Black women, only to soon after realize it came hand in hand with the violent claiming of and sense of entitlement to Blackness and Black bodies.

This is all to say, importantly, that whiteness cannot be done well, cannot be done without violence or without being in opposition to Blackness and Black freedom. But the extent of this lies far beyond ashy campaigns and disturbing open letters begging other white people to atone for their sins using the blood of Black women. We must critically engage the possibility that whiteness is only violent to Blackness, is only and can only ever be antithetical to Black liberation.

That we conceptualize whiteness as having a positive operation in the fight for Black liberation is perhaps the single greatest success of the normative functions of a colonialist State. That is to say, we have been successfully hoodwinked to believe that which harms us most vitally might also be able to save us.

“Rather than emerging from a scientific perspective, the notion, ‘race,’ is informed by historical, social, cultural, and political values,” writes Teresa J. Guess in The Social Construction of Whiteness: Racism by Intent, Racism by Consequence, “thus… the concept ‘race’ is based on socially constructed, but socially, and certainly scientifically, outmoded beliefs about the inherent superiority and inferiority of groups based on racial distinctions.” What this means is that race is designed as a hierarchal structure, and whiteness is constructed for no other purpose than to occupy the space of racial superiority. Therefore, to exist and act as white is to reinforce the dominance of whiteness.

Indeed, there would be no white race, no “race” as we know it, if whiteness weren’t positioned in violent dominion. That is the only thing it can do. Whiteness cannot operate in any way that does not first perpetuate white supremacy.

This, of course, is not to say that white people have not been the conduits for necessary Black liberation work. White people surely played integral roles in the freedom rides, abolition movement and the Civil Rights movement. But those roles were meticulously crafted by the toils, lives, death and suffering of Black people. The energy forced through those conduits was painstakingly produced by Black folks. To credit it as anything else is to fall prey to the same tempting veil of racism that motivates us to seek the impossible from our white allies. White people playing a role in liberation work are always merely actors, and the work done with them always done entirely in spite of their whiteness, not because of it.

All ways of addressing Black liberation for which white people are praised is always work Black people—Black poor and working class women, trans, non-binary, disabled and queer people especially—have already done and been doing and have made possible for white people to know.

Even John Brown, the white abolitionist who was executed in 1859 after leading an insurrection against pro-slavery forces, furthered the legacy of the likes of Nat Turner and other Black folks who fought and died for their own freedom before him. We must be sure in recognizing that dying for freedom did not begin with Brown, was not his legacy to create. Though perhaps in death, in a significant sacrifice of self, he and those like him have shed light on what it could mean to give up whiteness for good. When whiteness is so seeped into your being, might giving it up necessitate a threat to one’s safety and existence?

And where do white people exist in safety? In settler colonial societies, positions of power are designated and protected for whiteness. Perhaps the only action white folks can take—barring physical disappearance—in the struggle for Black liberation, for them to successfully put an end to their own whiteness, is the absolute absolving of their places and power. Their literal disappearance from the State and its institutions. It is worth exploring what this would mean for the the persistence of capitalism and the State. Is demanding the destruction of whiteness from the State to demand the destruction of the State, which was created by and has only ever known itself in service to (and in tandem with) whiteness? Which, each together, have only ever worked to maintain capitalism, anti-Blackness, and the disappearance of Indigenous people?

As John Stanfield writes in Theoretical and Ideological Barriers to the Study of Race-Making, “Racism and race-making are part and parcel of the manner by which major industrial, European-descent nation states such as the United States have originated and developed” (Stanfield 1985:161-162). This is how capitalism, anti-Indigeneity and anti-Black racism are intrinsically tied. None can exist in any way that is good for Black people. The presence of each is specifically predicated on Black subjugation.

After whiteness is obliterated, at that point, what the people who now identify as white should do is a giant theoretical exercise: what comes after whiteness? How does someone become not white? That is the legitimate and critical work of many. But our focus is always on Black folks figuring out new and better ways to get free—independent of white people and capitalism and the entirety of western empires. We are confident that our dreamings of freedom can crumble whiteness, capitalism and empire without giving deep consideration to the question of “what do we do with it”. We’re only interested in the work of building past it.

Kevin Rigby Jr. and Hari Ziyad are Black, queer, non-binary dreamers who, in some reality not yet here, are married, gendered or ungendered without colonial restriction, and free.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

The gaydar AI algorithm would peg this face [picture of Mary Wollstonecraft] as a rugmuncher mug.

Wollstonecraft married, but in the 18th Century it would have been common for lesbians and gays to marry into heterosexual relationships.

The origin of modern feminism — the particularly nasty and virulent form of feminism that seeks to invert the sexual market to the perceived benefit of ugly women by removing all constraints on female sexuality and stripping moral agency from women, while maximally restricting and pathologizing male sexuality and burdening men with all moral responsibility — was disproportionately a Jewish and ugly woman movement. The book that begat modern feminism was The Feminine Mystique, by Jewish woman Betty Friedan.

What followed in Friedan’s wake was a freak parade of uglier and uglier women fronting the modern feminist agenda, and enacting their warped vision of the sexes into policy (e.g. Title IX).

Steve Sailer argues feminism is a WASP concept, and 20th Century Jewish immigration and dominance in media and Hollywood actually delayed the triumph of feminism (seen in the WASPs passing Female Suffrage and Prohibition), because Jewish men, like all Semitic men, evolved in a patriarchal and ethnocentric culture and didn’t see a need to extend respect to shiksas.

Maybe proto-feminism is WASPy, but that doesn’t explain the Jewishness of modern feminism, unless one considers Jewish feminism an ethnic-scale case of intratribal negative transference. Jewish female feminists were rebelling against their patriarchal religion (and seething with resentment against their Jewish men lusting after pretty Gentile women), but as is the wont of their tribe they organized their resistance around defiance of the Gentile soft-patriarchy culture of comfortably accepted sex roles and sex-based preferences, instead of targeting their attacks against their own Swinesteins. They transferred the cause of their bad feelings onto the contemptible goyium.

Jewish-led feminism was actually a reaction to their own anti-feminist ethnic culture. But since Jewish men, like all men, are more interested than are women in acquiring status and power to exchange for sex, the heights of industries like Hollywood filled with patriarchal Jewish men instead of feminist Jewish women.

That’s not the end of the story. Jewish men eventually caught on that hypocritically espousing the radical feminism of their tribeswomen was a great stick with which to beat goy society and poison relations between Gentile men and their women….and also to fool naive feminists into bed using the “Hugo Schwyzer” male feminist ruse. If you’re a casting couch sleazebag running a de facto brothel for skanky actress wannabes, posturing like a champion of women’s lib is an effective way to keep the heat off you and your whores satisfied with a pittance of hush money and empty promises.

When one sees feminism, and especially modern feminism, through the lens of homosexuality, ugliness, and Jewishness, the tenets and demands of the twisted ideology begin to make sense.

Lesbians resent men. They love feminism because they want to be men in every way that matters, and that means they have a stake in undermining sex-differentiated norms and even sexual dichotomy.

Lesbian Feminism is the agenda of making unfeminine women into second rate men rather than first rate women.

Ugly women resent pretty women. They love feminism because they want to reduce the competitive advantages pretty women enjoy by enforcing equality and uniformity among women. Ugly women also love feminism because they understand on a deep level that they are too ugly to find a provider husband and must pursue careerism to collect the resources themselves.

Ugly Woman Feminism is the agenda of pitting the bottom quarter of women against the top three quarters of women.

Jewish women resent their patriarchal culture and Gentile social norms. They love feminism because it subverts the traditions of their ethnic religion and gives them cover to corrupt the benignly sex-differentiated Christian culture which largely rejects the radical value system of Jewish women.

Jewish Feminism is the agenda of delegitimizing patriarchal Judaism/Semitism and of poisoning the benevolent sexism of Christian Gentile culture.

Put those three origins of modern (and proto-) feminism together — the lesbian, the ugly, and the Jewish — into one monstrous frankenshrew, and you get intersectional insanity like “white male privilege”, the UVA rape hoax scandal, and the constant invocation of the mythological discriminatory “wage gap“. Not to mention the gross anti-male injustice known as the family court industrial complex.

PS Even WASP feminism is tainted in origin. Prohibition was a failure, and Female Suffrage has inarguably shifted America politically leftward and into the waiting petri dish of Poz.

The English Conservative #racist theenglishconservative.blogspot.com

Turn on a pop music station and some 90% of the music is black or of black origin. Walk down a street in any urban centre and the younger generations you encounter dress black, talk black and act black. Watch a football game and cheer on your mostly black team. Browse your local paper and their will be some sort of nearby event celebrating black culture or achievements.

The truth is, in their quest to be multicultural, the politicians and the metropolitan elite have shown a strong bias toward black (and Muslim) culture. Even the multiculturalists - that is, white middle-class liberals, in the main - have discriminated against other (not in-coincidently) peaceable, quieter communities: Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, Chinese.

No, it is mainly Muslims and especially blacks who have been the most resistant and to - and audibly opposed to - British culture and it is the Muslims and blacks who have the ear of the liberal establishment.

But the reason why black culture simultaneously proliferates and slips under the radar is that blacks have never caused an atrocity like Septermber the 11th or July 7/7. Had either of these two major atrocities never happened, Britain (also Europe and the United States) would never have had the chance to be critical of Islam without terrible accusations of racism or religious intolerance.

Yet black atrocities - of which there are many in Britain - never occur on a grand-scale. These are not the acts religious terrorists who are engaged in a holy war; black crimes do not cause shockwaves that reverberate across the world and have an aftershock which is felt a decade later.

No, the black crimes of rape, murder, gun and knife crime occur frequently but these crimes are often overlooked in the media or excused by liberal intellectuals (and ignoramuses, equally) who cite slavery, poverty and institutional racism.

The worrying thing is that black culture is accepted and promoted by the metropolitan elite and also the disaffected working classes. As the culture diffuses so will the crime; the crime is inseparable from the culture.

The Realist Report #conspiracy johnfriendsblog.blogspot.co.uk

The alleged "Holocaust" of "6 million Jews" at the hands of Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany during WWII is the biggest lie ever foisted upon humanity. The very idea that the Germans organized and executed a complex conspiracy involving "homicidal gas chambers" and other barbaric, sadistic forms of mass murder designed to exterminate European Jewry during WWII is laughable on its face when you stop and objectively think about it.

National Socialist Germany and her allies were fighting a multi-front war against some of the most powerful nations in the world at the time, including the United States, the British Empire, and the Soviet Union. The idea that they would divert their precious and extremely scarce resources and manpower towards implementing a systematic campaign of mass murder specifically designed to annihilate European Jewry is absurd.

There was no German conspiracy to systematically genocide and destroy European Jewry during WWII. There were no "homicidal gas chambers" utilized to murder Jews and other "undesirables". The system of concentration camps throughout much of Europe developed and administered by the Germans and their allies during WWII was simply a network of labor, transit, industrial and detention facilities - not "death camps". Jews, political prisoners and Communist subversives (many of whom were in fact Jewish), homosexuals and many others were detained and either put to work or imprisoned in German-administered concentration camps and industrial facilities throughout Europe.

These forced laborers and prisoners were well-cared for, at least until the end of the war when Germany's supply lines broke down and chaos ensued as a result of the Soviet and Anglo-American invasion of German territory. They were well-fed, well-provided for, and given medical treatment and entertainment. They were allowed to attend concerts, organize plays, make music and play sports. If the Germans were hell bent on murdering these people, why would they provide medical care for them and allow them to entertain themselves?

The entire WWII narrative, especially the fake "Holocaust" story, is basically the exact opposite from what we've been told and taught.

The Jewish Bolshevik terrorists who overthrew the Russian monarchy during WWI and their allies - the USA and the UK, primarily - committed the real atrocities and genocides against the German people and their sympathizers during and after WWII. The British and Americans engaged in a systematic fire-bombing campaign specifically targeting German industrial and urban areas for destruction. Major cities all throughout Germany were fire-bombed on a regular basis, resulting in the horrific death for millions of innocent German civilians - men, women and children.

The Allies sunk German civilian ships escaping the rampaging Soviet Red Army towards the end of the war, ending the lives of countless innocent civilians including, ironically enough, many Eastern European Jews fleeing from the advancing Red Army. The barbaric, out-of-control Red Army was encouraged to rape, pillage, torture and murder Germans as they advanced into German territory, and they did. Hundreds of thousands of German POWs and civilians were starved and murdered after the war, often suffering gruesome deaths from exposure, thirst and torture at the hands of the victorious and ruthless Allies. The National Socialist political, cultural and educational establishment was systematically dismantled and destroyed, with many top officials and leaders murdered, tortured, robbed, imprisoned and otherwise mistreated.

Jewish propagandists have entirely reversed the reality of the situation using their control of the media, and have blamed the Germans for starting the war and committing all the alleged atrocities, when in reality the Germans and their allies were the most disciplined, honorable and righteous forces fighting in that fratricidal Jewish-instigated war. The German people and their allies were the ones who experienced a genuine holocaust - a real genocide - during WWII, not the Jewish population of Europe.

The simple fact of the matter is that the "Holocaust" narrative - 6 million Jews persecuted, abused, and systematically exterminated by "those evil Nazis" during WWII - endlessly promoted and perpetuated by the Jewish-owned mass media, Hollywood and "entertainment" complex, and educational and political establishment is 100% bogus in virtually all respects. The Germans simply wanted the Jews out of Germany, clearly and correctly recognizing them as an alien, hostile and treacherous force working to subvert, pollute and destroy the German nation and Western civilization.

Jews were encouraged to leave Germany, and many did. Others were imprisoned or detained in the various labor and concentration camps established and administered by National Socialist Germany, and were well provided for. They were certainly not killed using "homicidal gas chambers" and other sadistic forms of murder in a systematic campaign to eliminate European Jewry.

But how exactly was such a monstrous hoax manufactured and presented to the public as if it actually happened? What follows is a brief overview identifying the primary means in which the alleged Jewish "Holocaust" during WWII was faked and sold to the public as if it were a genuine aspect of our collective history in order to advance certain geopolitical, cultural and economic agendas.

The role of Allied propaganda before, during and after WWII

The fake Jewish "Holocaust" narrative is really just an extension of an on-going anti-German propaganda campaign going back to WWI. During WWI, Western (often Jewish) propagandists targeted Germany and her armed forces with ridiculous "atrocity propaganda", alleging in their newspapers and other media outlets that the Germans were engaging in barbaric, ruthless behavior, including raping and murdering innocent civilians.

The fabricated idea that "millions of Jews" in Europe were being exterminated by the Germans and other "fascists" was regularly promoted by Jewish propagandists and their allies in the West beginning in 1915 during WWI. This slanderous, entirely false accusation had been and continues to be endlessly promoted to the often gullible and susceptible Western public, resulting in extremely negative anti-German sentiment, not to mention the widespread belief that the Germans did in fact commit these outrageous (although quite ridiculous) atrocities. [...]

During and immediately following WWII, deceitful propagandists continued to level this "atrocity propaganda" against the Germans in order to demonize them and prepare the Western world for the institutionalization of the myth of "6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis". Western and Soviet propagandists, including psychological warfare specialists in the United States Army and individuals connected to Hollywood, were involved in manufacturing "evidence" - including fake, altered or otherwise misrepresented photographs and videos, "human lampshades", "shrunken heads" and other absurd props - which was used to "demonstrate" to the world that the Germans did in fact commit outrageous atrocities during the war, particularly at the various concentration camps and industrial facilities under their administration. Dave Mansfield of MindWideOpen.net and Mike King of TomatoBubble.com recently collaborated and produced the following video underscoring the points I am making here:

The propaganda used to sell the idea of a "Jewish Holocaust" is extremely emotionally and psychologically exploitative, resulting in psychological trauma and an inability for the broad masses to objectively evaluate the information they are being presented with. This will be discussed in more detail as we continue.

[...]

The role of Jewish Hollywood and the organized international Jewish community

Since WWII, an entire industry relating to the fake "Holocaust" has arisen in the West. Disgusted by the outrageously brazen corruption emanating from the deceitful, exploitative leaders and representatives of "Holocaust survivors", Jewish academic Norman Finkelstein wrote a book discussing and exposing what he calls The Holocaust Industry. Organized Jewish interests and their lobbies have successfully created an extremely lucrative financial and sympathy racket based on their false, entirely fabricated narrative of "6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis" during WWII.

"At the end of the twentieth century, the 'Holocaust' is being bought and sold," wrote Tim Cole, a Professor of History specializing in the "Holocaust" at Bristol University, in his book Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler, How History is Bought, Packaged and Sold. "In short, 'Shoah [Hebrew word for Holocaust] business' is big business." (See here and here for more.)

The "Holocaust" is indeed an industry at this point - a commodity endlessly pushed and promoted by academia, politicians, government officials, international political organizations such as the UN, media moguls, Hollywood producers, organized Jewish groups, the Jewish state of "Israel" and others connected to the "Holocaust" racket.

Hollywood and the "entertainment" complex in the West - which is virtually entirely owned and dominated by Jews with deep ties to the Jewish state of "Israel" and the "Holocaust" industry - have produced countless propaganda films masquerading as objective depictions of experiences of European Jews during WWII. These films and documentaries have served to perpetuate, reinforce and even expand upon the false, entirely fabricated narrative of "6 million Jews systematically genocided by the Nazis" which has been manufactured and sold to the public during and after WWII.

There are countless "Holocaust" museums and memorials all across the globe, many of which receive official state funding and endorsement, including the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, DC. Not a day goes by without a mention of the fake "Holocaust" story in the mass media, entertainment complex, or political establishment. This false narrative is constantly being reinforced and perpetuated to the public on a daily basis, often in the most crass, deceptive, and emotionally exploitative ways imaginable.

The fake "Holocaust" narrative has advanced a number of important geopolitical, cultural and economic agendas primarily benefitting international Jewry and the illegitimate Jewish state of "Israel", including:

1. Elevating the alleged "suffering and persecution" of the Jewish people during WWII specifically, and all throughout history generally, over all others;
2. Covering up the crimes committed by Jewish terrorists, Communists and propagandists prior to, during and after WWII by projecting those crimes (and even fabricating new ones) on to the German armed forces and their allies;
3. Creating an extremely lucrative financial and sympathy racket, netting the Jewish state of "Israel" and the organized international Jewish community billions of dollars annually;
4. Serving as a basis for the creation of the Jewish state of "Israel", while excusing and justifying the genocidal, illegal policies she has pursued since her founding;
5. and demonizing the one man - Adolf Hitler - and his political movement who stood up for their country and race against the Talmudic forces of internationalism and globalism seeking the subjugation and ultimate destruction of the White race and all genuine nationalities, ethnicities and cultures.
That is how the "Holocaust" was faked, and what agenda this fabricated, insidious and deceitfully manufactured narrative has and continues to advance on a daily basis.

Writing in Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler described the Jews as having an "unqualified capacity for falsehood," and would go on to explain the concept of the Big Lie technique of psychological warfare and propaganda, which organized Jewry has used masterfully throughout history and to this very day, especially concerning the alleged "Holocaust" narrative, in order to falsify history and psychologically exploit mass audiences:

[...] in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.

Keep these profound insights in mind the next time you are exposed to the endless barrage of "Holocaust" propaganda emanating from Jewish Hollywood, the mass media and the educational and political establishment in America and around the world.

Robert Smith #racist amren.com

How a Young Black Man Became a Race Realist

I am a 21-year-old black man. I am an atheist, a registered Republican, and a member of Mensa. Already a minority within a minority within a minority, I have yet another idiosyncrasy that puts me in an even more unusual category: I am a race realist. I believe that consistently observed racial disparities in societal outcomes are largely rooted in genetic differences, primarily differences in average levels of intelligence.

High school

This was the first time race predominated in the social climate. I started to notice people self-segregating along racial lines. But most confusingly, black students who did not conform to stereotypes were considered “Oreos:” black on the outside, but white on the inside. I remember the following comments:

“You’re so quiet. Do you consider yourself black?” This from a white classmate, genuinely confused as to why I bucked the general black trend of rambunctious and loud behavior.

A white classmate says something racially offensive in my presence and another asks, “Why would you say that with a black person standing by us?” Answer: “It’s fine; he’s white at heart!”

An Asian classmate: “You’re an embarrassment to your race.”

A group of black students are listing black classmates whom they think act white, and include me: “Yes, he’s white on the inside. He has no accent and hangs out with too many white boys.” (The person who said that flunked out at the end of the school year. He enrolled in a predominately black high school and went to an HBCU. Two months ago, as of this writing, he was killed in a black-on-black crime. There were no protests or riots carried for him, since his death could not be made to look like black victimhood. He got nothing but a few people on Facebook posting his obituary. Maybe he should have acted more “white.”)

I not only saw blacks accuse other blacks of “acting white,” but, even more often, I saw whites accuse their black friends of “acting white.” My Asian friend — of whom I was quite fond — would often say that he didn’t consider me black. I found this extremely puzzling. To me, “acting white” meant being an Uncle Tom — someone who is intentionally betraying his race and cares more about the approval of whites than of other blacks. Being called an “Uncle Tom” is definitely not a compliment. In fact, it is one of the harshest insults for a black person.

The self-hating black person is derided in black culture, as in Uncle Ruckus from The Boondocks and Clayton Bigsby from the Dave Chappelle Show. Many blacks would rather associate with a murderer than with an Uncle Tom. This is not mere hyperbole. The black community eagerly embraces thugs and criminals who destroy their neighborhoods while it ostracizes its most principled members — educated and conservative blacks.

Even more confusing, I noticed that the more intelligent blacks would be particularly prone to accusations of “acting white.” All my life I had believed that trying to come across as an intelligent and civilized person, working hard, speaking standard English, assimilating into American society, not playing the race card, and not acting like a minstrel show character were characteristics of intelligence — not traits associated with any particular race. That ghetto blacks would accuse others of “acting white” I could, to some degree, understand. After all, the more academically oriented blacks did tend to associate more readily with white people than with other blacks, who tended to be ignorant. But what was truly mind-boggling to me was how whites and Asians could accuse blacks — even their own friends — of “acting white.” Why did they mock their black friends for doing what they were supposed to do? Why were intelligent and civilized blacks so often called race traitors by both blacks and whites?

Like an idiot, I succumbed to this pressure. I came to view hard work and academic success as “white” activities. I began to take school and life less seriously, approaching it with a half-hearted attitude, as if giving it my all would be “white,” and antithetical to the very core of my identity. I tried to the greatest extent possible to distance myself from my white classmates — not a good idea at a school that is 90 percent white.

I ended up graduating nowhere near the top of my class but still got into an elite college due to affirmative action and good test scores. I felt a bit guilty for gaming the system, but I felt I experienced discrimination — because of the “acting white” comments — and affirmative action was my way of getting back at an unfair system. (The same college also gave offers of admission to two other blacks from my high school. Their level of achievement was, obviously, high by black standards but also nowhere near the level that would have been required of a white or Asian.)

College

In college it soon became clear that I was woefully mismatched. I began to doubt whether I was smart enough to work at such an elite level. Perhaps the problem was me, not society.

Other black students were constantly on the watch for imaginary racism. They felt so self-entitled they drew up a document intended to force the school to accept more students and hire more professors from underrepresented races.

I doubted my abilities to such a great degree that I decided to get my IQ tested. My FSIQ (full scale IQ) was 141 — 99.7th percentile!

image

I have included my hand in the photo to confirm that I am black.

Acting white

For years I was convinced that the major cause of black social pathology was this “acting white” accusation and the phenomenon of having to “prove” one’s blackness. It had certainly had a great effect on my life and impacted other high-IQ blacks around me. However, one day I came across a brilliant article by Steve Sailer addressing this topic.

He made the incisive point that doing well in school would not be considered “acting white” if blacks and whites had the same average IQ. That was my turning point. I realized that this was not a discrimination issue at all or even evidence of racial bias. What my white and Asian classmates meant when they accused blacks of “acting white” was not to call them “Uncle Tom” or “race traitor,” but something more along the lines of “you act more like a stereotypical white person than a stereotypical black person.” Factor in the differing average IQs, and it’s no wonder why the more intelligent blacks are often accused of “acting white.”

Of course high-IQ blacks will tend to associate more with a group that has an average IQ of 100 than a group with an average IQ of 85. This “acting white” phenomenon is exactly what one would expect when groups differing as significantly in intelligence as do black and whites co-exist: Behavior that is associated with intelligence becomes associated with whiteness.

I am now amused by how difficult it is to separate behavior that is stereotypically black from behavior that is generally associated with low IQ: making poor life decisions, failing in school, getting in trouble with the law, being loud and obnoxious, speaking poorly, promoting destructive and ignorant behavior, etc. Conversely, it is difficult to distinguish behavior that is “white” from behavior that reflects high IQ: being polite and civilized, showing emotional restraint, working hard, speaking articulately, being educated, being goal-oriented, listening to classical music, etc. It’s as though everyone subconsciously picks up on the IQ differences even if they don’t explicitly realize that what they’re noticing is different levels of intelligence.

I continued to study the question. I found that that other black members of Mensa are commonly told they are “acting white.” This pattern holds true throughout the world. High-achieving blacks in Britain hear the same thing. Successful Brazilian blacks are called the complimentary term “black with a white soul.”

I learned that literally everywhere in the world where blacks are found in large numbers, they exhibit lower rates of educational success and higher rates of criminality than other races. It’s no mystery why blacks who buck these trends are seen as different from other blacks.

I got my own DNA tested. I found out that I am 25 percent European — which is to be expected among American blacks. More interestingly, I learned that I was in the 96th percentile for Neanderthal ancestry among African-Americans. I find it amusing that I’ve so often had my blackness questioned; I’m unusually high in genetic material that is completely absent from pure Africans.

Compelling quotations

Here are a few observations by blacks that have stuck in my mind.

“Most of the people who were popular in my high school are either dead or in jail.” — my aunt

“This area was so nice when white people lived here.” — my grandmother, driving through a black ghetto

“I have been called ‘white’ my entire life. It’s a shame that just because I didn’t get high, skip class, and steal from the corner store I was thought of as a lame individual.” — a female cousin

“It’s not too often we get a young brother like you here. You’re proper. Most of the young black men I know besides you are thugs.” — a middle-aged black man I met during a summer internship

“N*ggers are terrible.” — my father, who often comes into contact with ghetto blacks in his line of work

“If it’s stupid, they like it.” — my grandmother, referring to young black people

“Why do we always have to come up with dumb shit?” — my extremely militant and pro-black uncle, lamenting black people’s proclivity for ignorance

It’s IQ, not racism

I now have no doubt about race realism. All the lines of evidence, from history to life experience, point to the same conclusion. All the usual excuses for black dysfunction are epiphenomenal and stem from the basic fact of lower average black IQ. Others viewed us as inferior because we never developed the wheel, a written language, a calendar, a mechanical device, or a two-story building. Slavery happened because whites (and Arabs before them) were able to enslave blacks; they had better technology and capitalized on the lack of black cohesion. Historians estimate that 90 percent of the slaves shipped to the New World were first enslaved by other Africans. (This is also consistent with Phil Rushton’s application of r/K theory; Africans have always shown low in-group preference.) All the usual explanations for black failure melt away once the fact of lower IQ is acknowledged. Anti-intellectual culture, poverty, bad schools, single-parent families, lack of role models, you name it — they are exactly what you would expect in a population with a lower average level of intelligence.

I certainly have learned much more about how the world actually works from great men like Phil Rushton, Richard Lynn, Steve Sailer, and Jared Taylor than I have ever learned from hucksters like Ta-Nehisi Coates, Jesse Jackson, or Al Sharpton. One might find race realism to be a depressing worldview; of course no one wants to believe that his race is much less intelligent on average than other races. But I truly believe that if you evaluate the evidence from an unbiased perspective and use logic rather than emotion, you cannot come to any other conclusion.

Furthermore, a worldview that takes into account human biodiversity is certainly more realistic and even hopeful than eternally yearning for whites suddenly to “wake up to racism” or voluntarily renounce their thirst for destroying “black bodies” — something Ta-Nehisi Coates thinks comes naturally to them. It is more hopeful than waiting for blacks around the world to stop creating “cultures of incompetence,” for which they seem to have quite a knack. It is more hopeful than waiting 250 years for the achievement gap to close or 228 years for the black-white wealth gap to close.

I now know what would theoretically be needed to close these gaps: a higher black IQ. I am free of any resentment against whites, for no matter how bad slavery, Jim Crow, or any other misdeed that whites are frequently made to feel guilty for, blacks around the world are infinitely better off than they would have been if whites had simply left them alone to live in mud huts and tote spears in Africa.

I feel empowered, for I now know that there is no impenetrable wall of white racism holding me back. In the words of the founder of logic, Aristotle, “The high-minded man must care more for the truth than for what people think.” If admitting the truth makes me an “Uncle Tom,” so be it.

As for my uncle’s question, “Why do we always have to come up with dumb shit?”, applying Occam’s razor will yield an elegant and parsimonious answer.

Deadbeat #fundie realjewnews.com

[This is in response to an article on the shooting of Michael Brown.]

What this case reveals are the symptoms of neo-Bolshevism and cultural Marxism that grips America today.

Blacks are in a state of denial about the Marxist debauchery on their communities. Christian values in the Black community ahve been weaken out by cultural Marxism where there is a 72% illegitimate birth rate and only 10% of their households are intact.

Concerns about this trend were raised in the 1960's Moynahan report when 70% of Black families were intact and illegitimacy rate was below 30%. Unfortunately Black leaders back then labeled the report "racists" and thus the report was ignored.

The ugly truth of the Civil Rights movement was that Marxists attached themselves to the movement and used it to infest Blacks with the Liberal/Marxist ideology. Feminism, sexual liberation, and disrespect of (White) authority, took hold in the Black community.

The problem today however is trying to inform a dysfunctional community in denial about the truth. The result unfortunately is the worn out "political correctness" backlash of racism and sexism.

On the other hand mix a community in denial and thug culture with an "Israelified" police and you've got a power keg waiting to explode.

The irony is that Brown wasn't being stopped by the police for his robbery. He was being stopped for his defiance of authority and order. Walking in the middle of the street and refusing the officer's request is aligned with the thug culture advanced by cultural Marxism.

Marxism (Jewish culture) has decimated Black Americans and unfortunately the bought off black leaders owned by the Jews aim is to keep Blacks seeing their problem as one of racism (blaming Whites) and not one of values - the adoption of Jewish values and the lapse of Christian values.

CertifiedRabbi #racist reddit.com

There's glaring holes in the left's philosophy on segregation. The most obvious being their belief that every single racial group on this planet is inherently biologically equal in every way - at least when it comes to cognitive ability, since they don't seem to really get too worked up over the argument that blacks make the best sprinters and long-distance runners.

If every single race on this planet really was biologically equal in every way and the racial differences that we observe were merely the result of cultural, historical, and environmental influences (almost all of which, according to the left, ultimately boil down to White people being at fault), then what's the argument against racial segregation in the modern era?

If blacks and Hispanics are just as innately capable as Whites and East Asians of building and maintaining highly advanced societies with good schools, a diverse array of private businesses like tech companies and car manufacturers, and competent governance, then why would the creation of a black ethnostate within the Americas or Africa be a bad thing?

After all, both blacks and White shitlibs are constantly whinging about White privilege, racist cops, racist juries, racist judges, racist teachers and school administrators that are unfairly disciplining and marking down black students, racist university faculties that are discriminating against black students and black faculty, racist hiring practices and portrayals of blacks in the media, racist award ceremonies, et cetera. That's a lot of systematic anti-black racism!

White privilege and anti-black racism is not only systematic but omnipresent in the leftist worldview. And according to mainstream leftist philosophy on racism, every single White person on this planet is inherently and incurably racist. So, if you actually believed that, then why on Earth would you want to subject black people to that sort of racist oppression by forcing them to live in the same societies as Whites? I mean, even in South Africa where Whites now only comprise about 8% of the population, White shitlibs and blacks are still constantly whinging about inherent White supremacy and White privilege horribly affecting black South Africans - which implies that those problems will pretty much always exist as long as White people are still around, even in very small numbers.

Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to help blacks to completely escape the evaaal clutches of Whiteness by helping them to create their own ethnostate where they'd be free to have their own police force, their own courts, their own education system, their own financial and business sectors, their own media, their own government, and their own culture?

Of course I'm not the first person to make these points. Segregationists made these same exact arguments several decades ago, and the left responded to them by arguing that the separate but equal policies of the American segregation system still discriminated against blacks in numerous ways. For example, I remember being brainwashed in school about how black schools would receive the worn down chalk and old text books of White schools under these separate but equal policies. And the desegregationists argued that Whites had free access to all of the best agricultural land, businesses, schools, and government institutions under segregation - which made black inequality and failure inevitable.

Well, what if we could fix all of those problems by ensuring that black schools received not only the same amount of funding per student, but even more funding per student than White students? What if we ensured that this black ethnostate had access to arable land, trade ports, and natural resources? And what if we Whites agreed to give this black ethnostate a huge amount of financial and technological aid every single year in order to ensure that they had a good economy? And what if we agreed to do this for the next 500 years in order to more than compensate for the legacy of colonization, slavery, and discrimination? How would that be immoral or oppressive towards blacks in any way?

To reject that extremely generous arrangement, you'd have to lack confidence in the inherent aptitude of blacks to govern themselves and maintain a highly successful society. And that's the real underlying source of contention here. Deep down, both White libcucks and blacks know that blacks simply aren't capable of keeping up with Whites. I mean, there literally isn't a single highly successful black country anywhere in the entire world - which strongly points towards chronic black failure being biological rather than environmental. And the ugly science of intelligence testing proved that blacks really are inherently mentally inferior to Whites. And that's the dark undercurrent of this whole debate over segregation; both White shitlibs and blacks know that blacks tend to descend into 3rd world status when they're left to their own devices. And so that's why they view access to Whiteness as a fundamental human right that everyone on this planet is born with. And that's why they're so militantly opposed to segregation.

And the other dark undercurrent of this whole debate over segregation is how the left is using the concept of racism in order to destroy the White race. As I stated earlier, according to the mainstream leftist view on racism, all White people are inherently and incurably racist. And so if White racism and bigotry is the worse sin imaginable, and all White people are inherently and incurably racist and bigoted, then the only way to solve the problem of Whiteness is to completely destroy the White race and Western civilization. That's the real end goal here in this supposedly "noble" "anti-racism" (i.e., anti-White) "human rights" crusade; removing all obstacles to open borders, mass immigration, forced diversity, miscegenation, and wealth redistribution by demonizing, pathologizing, and literally criminalizing White racism and racial segregation.

Relentlessly crying about White racism and bigotry - both its omnipresent and everlasting nature - while simultaneously doing everything that you can to shove as many non-Whites as possible into White societies (including White schools) only makes sense if you lack confidence in the ability of non-Whites to create their own equally successful societies and are cynically exploiting the greatly exaggerated specter of White racism and bigotry in order to subvert the interests and very existence of the White race itself. If the races really are equal at the genetic level, and if White supremacy is an eternal evil, then you should actually support ethnonationalist movements like the Alt-Right and racial segregation in order to fully liberate black people. If you take leftist philosophy on race seriously, then opposing this form of benevolent segregation is a form of anti-black racism and oppression.

I also want to preemptively respond to anyone that would argue that agreeing to financially support this black ethnostate for hundreds of years is absolutely retarded because it would cost us billions upon billions of dollars.

Alt-Hype did a great job of estimating the fiscal impact of each race (excluding Asians) on America's annual budget. According to his very conservative estimates, blacks in America are taking at least $306.53 billion more out of the U.S. budget every single year through various handouts than they contribute through taxes. And according to his estimates, it's probably closer to $389.71 billion! And that doesn't even include our extremely generous foreign aid packages that we're sending to black countries all around the world. So, blacks are already costing us an absolute fortune every single year.

And so we'd actually probably save money if we agreed to give this black ethnostate $250 billion annually for the next 500 years. Heck, I'll be generous and agree to give blacks even more than that. How's $500 billion every year sound? Fuck it, have a full 1 trill every single year. If that's how much we have to fork over in order to entice blacks to finally get the fuck away from us, then so be it.

Also, you simply can't put a price tag on removing the cancer that is blackness from our society. We know for a fact that blacks are having a dysgenic effect on our gene pool. And according to Richard Lynn, the hidden crisis of dysgenics is affecting black Americans even more than it is White Americans. And so the chronic problems of black failure are just going to get worse and worse for us as time goes on. Jared Taylor also did an absolutely fantastic job of identifying the hidden costs of racial diversity in his opening remarks on a debate over whether or not racial diversity is a strength.

And while it's become popular to celebrate the cultural contributions of black Americans in recent decades, I don't see how it's possible for any sane and rational person to pretend that mainstream black culture (i.e., degenerate black hip hop [lack of] culture) has had a positive influence on America, Whites, or the world as a whole.

So, to White identitarians like us, preserving the uniquely beautiful White phenotype and bringing back our traditional high culture is absolutely priceless.

diggerfortruth #conspiracy #racism diggerfortruth.wordpress.com

It wasn’t too long ago that I too believed some of these misconceptions. Sooner or later the Truth and reality catches up with all of us.


1/. White European nations became rich off of the backs of the slave trade and plundering other nations
This is inaccurate. It was always the jews and the gentry directly serving the jews who benefited from the slave trade. After all it was mainly blacks enslaving blacks in Africa. The jews just capitalised on this industry. The actual lower classes never benefited from slavery, because they were slaves themselves; and still are.

And to argue that even the lower classes indirectly benefited due to the infrastructure, this too is not accurate. The European mind and energy has always had the ability to produce, create and invent at an incredible capacity. The railroads, hospitals, theatres, educational institutes were all physically produced by the working class on meagre wages. Any financial gains obtained by jewish families were spent internally to help international jewry; certainly not philanthropically distributed amongst society for the benefit of European peoples. The trickle down effect is another myth. We built and financed everything ourselves, through our hard work, ingenuity and creativity. That is the reality.

The myth that European nations are rich because we pilfered and enslaved others is nonsense – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.


2/. White Europeans invaded African culture, enslaved the blacks and had a cruel apartheid system
First the white Europeans who were fleeing jewish enslavement settled in a barren uninhabited South Africa. There was nothing much there other than nature’s elements – rocks and bushes. The hard working, ingenious, mixed Europeans literately created a superpower out of the bushes. Then when they had built a civilised structure – the blacks came to them. They did not build up their culture off the backs of the blacks.

As for the apartheid – what else could they do? It was the most sensible thing to do, to keep the blacks from rampaging their culture. Just look what is happening to the Afrikaners now that the apartheid has been abolished. The apartheid was essentially a border control that’s all.

The myth that the white South Africans used the blacks to create their lifestyle is ridiculous propaganda – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
[please listen to Karen Smith’s interview below]
t
t
3/. Being racist is the most anti-social thing one can be
Well first of all this word racist was coined by a mass murdering jew called Trotsky. This was created in order to guilt up any Whites who dare to stand up for their European culture. It is a powerful word and meme and this single word alone enables vast amounts of white people to bend over backwards to accommodate non-whites into their culture, just in order not be labeled a racist. Whites will give up their heritage, jobs, culture, lineage, identity and lifestyle so long as they are not called this silly little name. It is truly incredible the power of trigger words through mind control – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
4/. Diversity enriches European societies
On the surface, one could argue that having multiple choices of restaurants from many different cultures is a positive thing for society. One could indeed say that these cultures are contributing to European culture by providing alternatives. But at what price? How much of a payoff do we have for this enrichment? It is obvious by now to anyone who is prepared to use an ounce of logic that behind the surface of this colourful enrichment; the indigenous European peoples are paying a hefty price. In fact we are suffocating. Multiculturalism is the death spell of European culture and civilisation. Had Europeans just had a policy that only small amounts of people can stay providing they provide a unique contribution: a Chinese martial art, a Korean healing system, an Indian meditation technique, etc; then this really would be enrichment. The reality is most people coming to Europe have only one interest – to serve themselves. None of them give a damn about the preservation of our European culture. Every single migrant cares only about their self interests and their culture. None of them actively help to preserve European culture. Diversity = white genocide. Diversity is enrichment – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
5/. Colour is just skin deep – we’re all equal
This is simply not true! One only has to objectively look at each race and look at each races’ achievements. One can use all the excuses in the world as to why certain cultures have not been able to develop; but we all have been on this planet for the same time. It’s too much of a coincidence that in every single part of the globe that White European cultures have lived – civilised cultures have blossomed. Europeans built the pyramids. It is only because of jewish interference that white Europeans have not been able to fully develop. Just look what Germany achieved in just six years free of the parasitic jews. The same for England after Edward the 1st (Longshanks) booted the jews out of England ….look how England prospered. It’s been the same in every European culture, if Europeans are left to flourish on their own without the parasitic jew. The ‘we’re all equal’ narrative is just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
6/. The only reason a high percentage of blacks are violent is because they have been socially suppressed by whites and all they are doing is venting their righteous anger – it’s justified
Righteous anger – about what exactly? Having been afforded 100 fold opportunities in a European culture than in their own culture? Just look at the opportunities they have been given. Companies and local councils are bending over backwards with ‘affirmative action’/equal opportunities for non-whites. In fact it is easier now for a non-white to get a job in a Government/local council job. Not to mention the handouts. And how can the unprovoked attacks on whites be explained in South Africa? These were not oppressed people’s, they were outsiders coming in to destroy White civilisation. The notion that all blacks (as a collective) need is education and they will blend into any civilised European society has now been proven a myth. How far do we have to stretch things to continually come up with excuses for black on white crimes – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide. [please see video channel below]
t
t
7/. White people and white cultures are innately racist
What could be further than the Truth. White people (as a collective) are THE least racist people on the planet. And I struggle with this term racist anyway; as it is another trigger word created by the jews. But as far as being accommodating – there is no race on the planet more accommodating than the white European race. We have given and given and given and given throughout our whole existence. And we continue to give in endless charitable and philanthropic projects. Yet somehow as the providers, we always seem to end up with the racist label and the ones feeling guilty for not having done enough and somehow being the suppressors of non-whites. Had it not been for the white peoples’ inventiveness, with sanitation, electricity, medical resources, etc; the population of non-whites would be far less. Whites are evil racists – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
8/. All races can pull together to fight the common evil
At one point I truly did believe this nonsense. I really did think that if all races and cultures woke up to the JCN, then we’ld live a more peaceful existence – ha. Oh dear, how embarrassing. The concept that if we all pull together to fight our common foe, we would live in peace. Utter nonsense. Just look at each race and how they only look after themselves. You can see it within the Truth movement – the blacks are all about their black issues, the Muslims are only pro-Islam, even the gays only care about their gay issues. None of these secular groups want to join forces to fight the jewish agenda, because secretly they know who is funding their particular agenda. They’re all ultimately about bringing down the European race.
t
t
9/. Just like mongrel dogs, mixed race people are healthier and less susceptible to inbred diseases
And there are people out there who propagate this garbage. As with all these modern memes, it couldn’t be further from the Truth and as always just more inverted Truth. The healthiest of races are the purest of races. This is a given. Mixed race children apparently are not able to receive organ donations. Why all of a sudden would genetics suddenly change in cultures? If races have bred amongst their own for thousands of years; why now is this seemed unhealthy? A jewish propagandised narrative perhaps – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
10/. Black men are more virile than white men
I know this may seem like scraping the barrel, but this topic often crops ups. I’ve had to listen to this crap all my life. It’s so obvious who is behind this myth and why they would propagate it. It is just another method to knock the white man’s confidence. To make him feel inferior to other races. Whilst at the same time programme (propagandise) white women, (along with the music industry) into believing that dating black men is a better option and somehow black men are more masculine. Hence to encourage race-mixing – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.

Figi Moheder #racist youtube.com

As I've said from the beginning of the bullshit, there's nothing wrong with racism or prejudice! The Zionists starting the racism 'outrage' was/is THE PROBLEM!! Having blacks from the ghetto come to white communities in droves because they can't even take it anymore, and white liberals falling for this shit so they can both feel so good about themselves as the original inhabitants' lives, safety, respect, and cultures are taken from them is arrogant and evil as hell! People's personal opinions about ethnicities are nobodies' business, and it's been wrong as fuck to use that against whites or anybody and their, lives, jobs, cultures, safety, happiness, etc. And I'm not against all blacks. I actually (used to) appreciate them a lot. But, this whole forcing them with whites and others to race-mix away our race and theirs', give a different feel to both our former communities, getting blacks to like white music and whites to think they like black culture and music, FORCING blacks to think they like hockey, whites to think they love basketball, all the while blacks are taking both their own people's lives and our lives away from us has caused me and others to be intensely upset at them, the Zionists, and white traitors. They censored racial jokes and tried to train everyone's brains into being against stereotypes that they took away laughter and got us ready to pop on each other. And, the only way it was stifled was the traitorous public going along with the agenda and making fun of whites and having interracial sex like there's no tomorrow?? No, that is DEFINITELY NOT the way to go. Using racism as a witch hunt is fucked. And going after JonTron's every little word, while he's just being himself,to get him filled in as evil by Destiny who is the true fascist evil is dead wrong. I never cared if blacks are racist. I don't care. There was never a problem about it. And to thought crime the last of us sane ones to death (very soon) while the Zionists and their Leftist minions sickeningly take over would've been a joke in a comedy 25+ years ago. But it's the sad reality in a lot of ways!! Wow. Most individuals were racist before this nightmare (and mean fucks, too). And they've patted themselves on the back for falling for all this shit and have changed overnight because they're friends or media told them so. They suck big! I personally knew a jerk who said nigger's hanging we're the good old days. After hearing some recent bit of media bullshit, he suddenly is all about 'all this hate has to stop.' REALLY?! And he was an asshole on top of it. No, you are not good people if you fallen for bs and fascist takeover. Society was not wasting their existence on such bullshit like racism, guys going pee-pee in women's bathrooms, women cutting their hair to look like boys, the birth of asexuals and pansexuals (wtf?). We were much happier not dividing over insane bs as that and were able to just live our lives and follow our dreams. And, no retards, shaming someone into being dupes like you is not right at all. Fuck professional sports, corporations, Zionist-approved music, Zionist entertainment, cable companies, schools -you get the picture. Fucking boycott them and protest them. Yes it's a sin people can't go to a hockey game and see blacks starting to get into the game, or see hockey players all sporting rainbow colored tape on their sticks. It's a sin we can't walk into a chain store without seeing rainbow princesses advertised for your daughter to go out as for Halloween, and all the new black and white couples. You assholes and bitches. It's a nightmare to tune onto Sirius radio and have to hear the evil public ask the announcer if Elvis was racist in 2015. It's an absolute nightmare and Ms. Destiny and ALL those like her need to have their guts sculped in public forever, not us. Look how serious I've become a lot, huh? It's because this unfair, insane thing took off and is only allowed to be empowered. Screw the Leftist fools.

Guest #racist freedomoutpost.com

Subject: Socialism, Racism Explained, Easy to Grip....
YEP!!
Racism, Socialism, Simply explained...
A young Black kid asks his mother, "Mama, what is Socialism, and what is Racism?"
"Well, Child,... Socialism is when white folks work every day so we can get all our benefits,
you know... like free cell phones for each family member, rent subsidy, food stamps, EBC,free healthcare, utility subsidy, and on and on, ..you know. That's Socialism ".
"But Mama, don't the white people get pissed off about that?
"Sure they do Honey. That's called Racism!"

(Never more simply explained...) Best I know

EndZOG #racist endzog.wordpress.com

Star Wars VII: Time For Violence Against Anti-White Jew Movies
Enough moaning already. Once more Jew Shmolleywood releases an anti-white movie and all the girls on the Daily Stormer and Counter Currents et all will moan and groan and curse the Kike and wring their hands and sit at home and do nothing.

This time we should stand up, fire-bomb the movie houses, cover them in graffiti, attack the posters and the billboards, even take out a hit on the parasites behind it. What do you think God gave you the early morning hours for? To sleep or to defend your race? Time for the underground attacks to begin.
The Jews started the race war a long time ago, granted unlike their non-white battalions we don’t want to go around killing minorities as those minorities are physically killing us incited to do so by Jews like Timothy Wise, but we should at least target the Jews money supply by targeting their product.

The whole point of director J.J. Abrams’ political activism is to ensure that the Talmudic and Torahanic agenda of genociding the white race as the only opposition of the Jew World Order one world government will succeed. The longed for extermination of the white race and the reduction of it’s few survivors to race-mixing morons is to create the conditions in which all the then brown, low IQ Goyim will be slaves, and all their wealth, property, lands and personal freedom will revert to the Jew as promised by the Satanic Jewish ‘god’ Yahweh
This blasphemy of the Star Wars franchise has prompted online fans to boycott “Star Wars: The Force Awakens” for being anti-white.

The hashtag #BoycottStarWarsVII exploded on Twitter Monday, just hours before the release of a new trailer during ESPN’s Monday Night Football game between the New York Giants and the Philadelphia Eagles. The reason: Abrams’ movie is allegedly a dream come true for race activists.

“#BoycottStarWarsVII because it is anti-white propaganda promoting #whitegenocide,” an account called End Cultural Marxism said. “A friend in L.A. said #StarWarsVII is basically ‘[Black Lives Matter activist Deray Mckesson] in Space.’ Jewish activist JJ Abrams is an anti-white nut.”
The Hollywood Reporter found a tweet by a user identified as Captain Confederacy saying, “[Social Justice Warriors] complain about White artists ‘misappropriating’ culture created by blacks but then celebrate a non-White Star Wars.”

“It’s nothing more than a social justice propaganda piece that alienates it’s core audience of young white males,” another user tweeted, the website reported.

Anti-white activist and Kike movie director Abrams also just helped raise $750,000 for the Democratic Party at a fundraiser at his Pacific Palisades, California, home.
The Hollywood Reporter found a tweet by a user identified as Captain Confederacy saying, “[Social Justice Warriors] complain about White artists ‘misappropriating’ culture created by blacks but then celebrate a non-White Star Wars.”

“It’s nothing more than a social justice propaganda piece that alienates it’s core audience of young white males,” another user tweeted, the website reported.

Anti-white activist and Kike movie director Abrams also just helped raise $750,000 for the Democratic Party at a fundraiser at his Pacific Palisades, California, home.
The Oct. 10 event, which President Obama attended, cost attendees $33,400 per ticket, Deadline Hollywood reported.

“Star Wars: The Force Awakens” opens in U.S. theaters Dec. 18, 2015.

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

More than a few superficial observers of America's rotten sub-culture must no doubt be surprised to learn that a deceased "White guy" was actually the driving force behind the promotion of decidedly anti-White "gangsta rap" music. Over the course of his miserable existence, Jerry Heller, the son of a low-level Jewish mobster, raked in many millions of dollars while corrupting and inciting Black youth.

From the Slimes' article which honors the bastard:

"Jerry Heller, a veteran music manager who helped introduce N.W.A to the masses and promoted gangsta rap to a mainstream audience, died on Friday in Thousand Oaks, Calif. He was 75."

For the uncultured and unrefined among you, N.W.A. was a popular 1990's "hip hop" group known for violent lyrics and anti-cop songs. The acronym stands for: "Niggaz Wit Attitudes" --- that's "Niggers With Attitudes" for the ebonically challenged. The musical marauders "outta Compton" consisted of the star-studded cast of Arabian Prince, Dr. Dre, Eazy-E, Ice Cube, DJ Yella and MC Ren. (rolling eyes) Here is just a bit of the profane poetry puked out by Heller's badboys, and taken to heart by millions of frustrated young black males: (Warning!)

Fuck the police coming straight from the underground
A young nigga got it bad cause I'm brown
And not the other color so police think
they have the authority to kill a minority
Fuck that shit, cause I ain't the one
for a punk motherfucker with a badge and a gun
to be beating on, and thrown in jail
We can go toe to toe in the middle of a cell
Fucking with me cause I'm a teenager
with a little bit of gold and a pager..

-- From "Fuck the Police

It may be hard for the 30 and under crowd to conceive, but there was a time when Black music was clean, full of positive energy and pleasing to the ear (if one was fond of that particular genre). That was when it was Black-owned and Black-promoted. In addition to "Blues" and "Jazz", the most notable genre was "Motown" -- a term which came to represent both a style of music and an American record company. The company was founded by Berry Gordy, Jr. as Tamla Records in 1959, and incorporated as Motown Record Corporation in 1960, in Detroit, Michigan --- the "Motor City" (hence,"Motown").

While Gordy was at the helm. Motown cultivated and promoted clean acts that often had wide "crossover" appeal to White audiences -- familiar names like Smokey Robinson, The Four Tops, The Jacksons, Diana Ross, The Temptations, Lionel Ritchie, Stevie Wonder et al. The upbeat songs and the well-dressed performers were non-offensive -- and singers spoke proper English. Imagine that!

Smokey Robinson, The Four Tops, Lionel Ritchie -- mushy love songs and upbeat tunes --- nothing about fornication, drug dealing, bitches, ho's, or killing cops

So, what the bloody heck happened to Black music? How did it devolve so quickly from innocent and catchy tunes to the violent, sex-crazed, pro-drug, anti-cop, anti-White noise pollution heard today? If they don't already know, regular readers of The Anti-New York Times will no doubt hypothesize that the rapid descent of Black pop-music was engineered by the same usual suspects (cough cough) who took over and corrupted once-clean Disney, MTV, Nickelodeon, BET etc. Well, hypothesize no more, because any such suspicions are indeed correct! (surprise surprise)

Regarding Motown, which is just one example, in December 1998, after already having been sold to a company called Polygram, Motown was acquired by Seagram and absorbed into its Universal Music Group. Seagram, better known for its alcohol products, is owned by the Bronfman Family (cough cough) -- a Canadian-American Jewish dynasty who, in terms of sheer power and influence, rank right up there with the Sulzbergers and the Rothschilds. Needless to say, Motown, (by now relatively insignificant) and Black music in general, have never been the same. At the same time that the usual suspects continue to poison Black youths with their demonic music, they also incite Blacks against Whites and against the police.

It's the ultimate societal false-flag operation, and it's a "twofer" to boot! First, they ruin millions of young Black lives with moral poison, family dissolution and economic disintegration; then, using their wholly-owned Black Judas-Goats (Obongo, Black Lives Matter, Jesse JackAss, Al Charlatan, skanky Beyonce, et al), they sic the frustrated, fatherless and envious "Frankenstein monsters" -- which they themselves created -- against the big bad White Man and the evil "po-leece." They've even got stupid suburban White kids hooked on this soul-crushing garbage now.

What a dirty damnable game! Rot in hell, Mr. Heller (pun intended), rot in hell.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today about a guy named Jerry Heller. I didn't know that a White man was so instrumental in promoting gangsta hip-hop.

Boobus Americanus 2: Some of the Black activists have a point when they complain about how Whites are appropriating Black culture in order to profit from it.

Sugar: Heller wasn't "White" --- you $#*^@& ass-clown! He was a #*^@#*!^&!

Editor: Sugar never really cared much for the "cough cough" thing.

Paul M. Dohse Sr. #wingnut #fundie paulspassingthoughts.com

“Please note, there is no such thing as hypocrisy in politics; all positions flow from ideology based on the political presupposition. Besides, who are you oh little person of the great unwashed to judge what is hypocrisy or not hypocrisy?”

Elitism is a result of sin, but this is a political post and not a religious one. Nevertheless, let me say that Elitism began in the garden. The serpent came to Eve and claimed to have more knowledge about God than she had. It can also be said that, clearly, the serpent claimed to have more knowledge about reality than Eve. Hence, caste was first introduced, and the serpent was presenting himself as a mediator between her and God. In addition, the serpent was claiming to have knowledge that would benefit her personally.

From this, Elitism was born. Those who have the superior knowledge should rule over those who have less knowledge because those with less knowledge are detrimental to humanity because of their ignorance. Socrates defined sin as ignorance.

Fundamentally, there are two different caste systems: freewill and predetermined. The latter dominated human history until the Enlightenment Era. Those of the Elitist class who should rule over the great unwashed are preordained in some way—usually by lineage. The British Crown is a good example.

America is based on a caste system, but there is a very important distinction that determines how free the people will be under such a caste system. In the American system, Elitism can be earned no matter who you are. This is freedom of upward mobility; this is the freewill caste system. In America, if you don’t like being treated like a loser by the Elitists, you can pursue an education and become one yourself. Remember, it is knowledge based; the perceived knowledge is the moral rule.

Better than both of these is Individualism. This is an organic body concept. To the degree that every individual is the best individual they can be, ALL people benefit. This would seem rather obvious. Think of a body and all of its cells. The 100 trillion cells that make up your body vary greatly in regard to the role they play, and their depth of intelligence and function. Even the most simple cells are well beyond being fully understood by scientists. To the extent that each cell is as healthy as it can be, human wellbeing is determined. In an individualist society, contributing to the success of every individual benefits all of the other individuals. America’s representative republic is based on Individualism while freewill caste is an unfortunate residual product of it.

Communism and Socialism flow from a predeterminant caste system. That is, those of the Elitist class are predetermined. There is no upward mobility for those not preselected. Elitism is defined by predeterminant caste.

Please note, there is no such thing as hypocrisy in politics; all positions flow from ideology based on the political presupposition. Besides, who are you oh little person of the great unwashed to judge what is hypocrisy or not hypocrisy?

Now, let’s put some feet on this. Nancy Pelosi is supposedly a hypocrite because she is for gun control but always protected by a heavily armed security detail that doesn’t have to abide by any gun laws like gun-free zones etc. That’s not hypocrisy at all, but merely a result of her Elitist ideology. According to her worldview; it makes perfect sense.

First, the great unwashed cannot be armed in case the Elitists have to do something they know is best for the whole of society that much of society might disagree with. Along with that comes necessary collateral damage that is outweighed by the greater good. Sure, you may have to watch your family being ravaged during a home invasion while defenseless, but that is unfortunate collateral damage for the greater good. In contrast, if an Elitist is lost, the world has less knowledge and leadership to protect the great unwashed from themselves. The absolute cardinal sin is the belief that individuals know what’s best for themselves. This, in the eyes of Elitists, puts all of society at risk.

In addition, the sole purpose of the individual is to serve the needs of the Elitists; in fact, their total life value is based on their ability to do so. The following excerpt makes this point aptly:

Sharon Osbourne is facing backlash after revealing she forced her former assistant into a burning building before firing him.

On a recent episode of the BBC game show, Would I Lie To You?, Sharon, 67, recalled that she and Ozzy, 71, were home for Christmas one year when their house became engulfed in flames from a candle they were gifted for the holiday.

“This alarm was ringing and ringing,” The Talk host said. “A fire alarm. I sent him [Ozzy] down. And so he went down, and suddenly I hear my name being called. ‘Sharon, Sharon, help me!’ “

“I went downstairs and there he was in the living room and his arm was on fire,” Sharon continued. “He had a sling on. And half his hair was all on fire.”
After noting that Ozzy’s assistant was still sleeping during the crisis, Sharon said that she used a magazine to try and stop the fire on Ozzy’s shirt and hair, but to no avail.

“So then outside there was a fountain,” she explained. “I pushed Ozzy out and then the arm and his hair stopped. And then I think ‘Right, where is that assistant?’ So I go into the guest house and he’s going, ‘Everything Alright?’ and I’m like ‘No, house is on fire. Get out, help. Go in and get the paintings out.’ “

“There were dogs, and I said ‘You must go in and find the dogs,’ ” she recalled telling the assistant. “So he did get the dogs, and the fire engines arrive. Very lovely people. They came and they had this oxygen for the assistant. So then I said to him ‘How very dare you, you work here, and you get more paintings out right now.’ “

“I took the mask and I put it on my dog,” Sharon said, which earned applause and laughter from the judges and audience. She then explained the moment she decided to fire her husband’s assistant.

“After this terrible night, he was not talking to me,” Sharon recalled. “And Ozzy and I were counting everything and we were laughing and laughing and he goes ‘I don’t see what’s funny about any of this. I think I am going to have damaged lungs.’ “

“So then, I just said ‘If you don’t think that’s funny, do you think this is funny?’ And he said, ‘What?’ And I said, ‘You’re fired,’ ” Sharon said, again receiving applause and laughter from the studio.

When it came time for the judges to guess if the shocking story actually occurred, all three predicted it was true — which Sharon confirmed.
Following the revelation, fans flocked to social media to express their disappointment in Sharon.

A rep for Sharon did not immediately return PEOPLE’s request for comment.

Though many are shocked by this testimony from Osbourne, they shouldn’t be; the sum and substance of an individual’s life is determined by their ability to serve the Elitists according to their worldview.

Be sure of this: Elitist rule will rob us of all freedom if we allow it to have political power; Elitism is freedom’s greatest enemy.

paul

Druidshift #racist reddit.com

Responding to an article about Black residents leaving Austin

Between articles like these popping up near constantly and the rush of articles last week claiming that gay men are attacking black women and "stealing their cultural identity" I am just about tapped out on my sympathy to "racism".

I grew up in a small town that was very segregated. I was aware of racism and felt terrible about it. Now it is getting to the point that I don't care at all. I am tired of the "all white people are terrible" line of thought that permeates liberal spaces. My family immigrated from Germany to escape nazis. The other side of my family was Cherokee. None of my ancestors were slave owners and if they would have been, then that's not my fault.

Meanwhile I have to endure article after article, supposedly written by intelligent black thinkers, that tell me my very existence is racist.

You want to move to east austin? You are a racist gentrifier.

You want to move to the suburbs? You are a racist participating in white flight.

You have black friends? You are a racist collecting tokens.

Don't have black friends? You are a racist practicing ethic cleansing

Support affirmative action? You are a racist! You practice the racism of "lowered expectations" thinking the proud black race needs a helping hand and can't qualify on their own merits.

Don't support affirmative action? You're a racist! You are to scared to compete on a level playing field.

If you try to expand your horizons and immerse yourself in black culture? You're a racist! You are appropriating culture from the proud black woman!

If you don't know anything about black culture? You're a racist! You just like to whitewash society.

It's impossible to not be racist it seems, so I don't care anymore. The biggest killer of young black men are other black men. The biggest barrier to economic affluence and the greatest contributor to intergenerational poverty in the black community is the black cultures acceptance of ignorance and celebration of thug life. The most racist person I ever met was my black coworker Tatiana who used to get the shit beat out of her for getting good grades. That's right....doing well in school is considered "acting white", and as such she HATED "ignorant black people". But keep in mind....I never see articles from black writers saying how maybe black people need to step up and fix problems in their community. No...it's always the white mans fault.

And then let's not forget the brain trust that is the black feminist. In the 60s a bunch of gay drag queens got together and as a form of fighting back started to adopt speech and mannerisms over exaggerating females. Watch Paris is burning. The sashay. The "mmmhmmmm". The twirling of the head and rolling of the eyes? Gay men invented that. Then 50 years later an over indulged black woman says that gays actually stole that from HER people. And we need to cut it the hell out and get back in the closet.

Fuck her. Fuck people who say I am a racist simply because I exist. Why does the black intelligentsia of this country keep on alienating everyone and telling us we are evil and worthless? That right there should tell you how powerful black people have gotten. They now are secure enough that they don't care about allies. They shit on other minorities like the lgbt. And they insist they are the victims.

I am the most liberal person I know. I believe strongly in social justice. But I am so fucking sick of being called a racist.

Here, read the brilliance of the social justice warrior. This does more harm to liberal political causes then ann coulter and rush Limbaugh combined

http://time.com/author/sierra-mannie/[1]

http://www.autostraddle.com/white-gay-man-publishes-epically-stupid-response-to-stop-stealing-black-female-culture-245972/

stupid_Goof, wwaayynnee #racist #wingnut reddit.com

Peel school board 'dysfunctional' in face of racism, can't govern properly, report finds

A newly-released report on the state of the Peel District School Board (PDSB) paints a damning picture of dysfunction among administrators who are ill-prepared to deal with anti-Black racism directly affecting students.

The province released a report it had commissioned from lawyer and human rights advocate Arleen Huggins on Monday, in which she investigated the school board's capacity to comply with a host of directives from Ontario Education Minister Stephen Lecce after a review of the board found issues of systemic racism.
……….
A third-party review of the board found that Black students are only 10.2 per cent of the secondary school population, but about 22.5 per cent of the students receiving suspensions.

The reviewers heard anecdotally that some principals "use any excuse" to suspend Black students, including wearing hoodies or hoop earrings.

Recent school board data shows that about 83 per cent of secondary school students in the board are racialized, and the reviewers say about two-thirds of teachers in the board are white.

Lecce has previously said one element of the report that was especially troubling was that disproportionate numbers of Black students are being streamed into applied streams of education, rather than into university-focused courses.


Stupid_goof : “I bet a lot of that racism comes from the students themselves too.”


wwaayynnee :The word 'racism' is thrown around alot these days.....lets read some specifics. Who's racist? Give examples of all this 'racism' in Peel schools. Everywhere I go I see blacks and whites getting along great. Is the racism coming from other races? Instead of screaming RACISM with no explanation, give specific information. The article states that black students make up 10% of student population but recieve 22% of suspensions... thats 'racism' ?? Is it possible that the students actions lead to these suspensions? Is it possible that the high number of single mothers/broken families in the black population have more to do with a students actions than 'racist' teachers/principles have to do with it?

Gary Naler #fundie remnantbride.com

First, for general information, hyenas are not dogs, the Canidae, as one might think. Instead, they have their own family, the Hyaenidae, which is actually closer to the cats, the Felidae. There are four species within the Hyaenids: the spotted, brown, and striped, as well as the aardwolf. The range of the spotted hyenas is strictly within Africa. They have one main foe, and that is the lions, which are responsible for up to 70% of their adult deaths. Lions will actually hunt and kill hyenas; and if hyenas find a lone female lion and significantly outnumber her, they will kill her. Interestingly though, hyenas will eat lions, but lions will not eat hyenas. Uniquely, they just kill them.

Another important general fact to know about the spotted hyena is their social structure. More will be noted about this; but, they live in groups known as clans. Normally, the clans are thirty to forty members, but can be as large as eighty or ninety.

Now, having noted this, let us begin examining some of these things that make the spotted hyena so dramatically anomalous from all creation. Prepare yourself, you are getting ready to discover some of the most bizarre things you have ever heard about an animal.

First, let us identify the prevailing issue that causes us to address the spotted hyena in context with the ill fate of the woman taking the place of the man. Remember, we are looking at Yahweh God’s creation testimony concerning this. One might then suspect that the spotted hyenas are a matriarchal society where the female rules, . . . and this is exactly what we find. In fact, spotted hyenas are matriarchy on steroids! Not only does the dominant female rule over the males, but the females are ordered according to what could be called a caste system, where each one of them occupies a specific social, hierarchical status that is strictly enforced. Every aspect of their daily lives are ruled by their individual ranking within that caste. And like any caste system, the female cubs born to any one of those mothers, are locked into that inherent status. Thus, a female offspring of the head matriarch will replace her mother upon her death.

And, this caste system has further highly determining consequences as well. How much food each member eats is dictated by their place in the caste. Those at the bottom eat least and last. Therefore, the lower in the caste, the less healthy they are, and the less likely their cubs are to survive. Again, welcome to God’s testimony of matriarchy on steroids!

So, in this severe matriarchal system, how do the males fare? There are many feminists who would love the outcome of the male spotted hyena. In fact, I’m surprised they do not use the spotted hyena for their mascot. Evidencing this, the following image adopted in the 1980s by feminists, could just as well have been their true and most fitting mascot, attested by Yahweh Himself. Click on this image to see its true fulfillment in feminism. (Click on it again to repeat it.)

Let’s put it this way: the only thing lower in the female caste system, . . . is being a male. While the chief matriarch is the zenith in the clan, any male is the nadir, the lowest place there is, and the one who suffers the most extreme adversity. Any male is dominated by all the females. It does not help the male either that, as with the black widow spiders and the phalaropes, the females are distinctly larger, and far more aggressive. In the photo to the left, you can see this obvious size difference in the mounting male. And, the males that are more likely to be allowed to mate with the females are passive and younger. In fact, it eventually comes down to which male is willing to put up with the abuse of the females. We see the same in society: dominant females tend to marry passive men whom they can control (when they do marry).

burnitdown #racist burzum.com

I am not arguing for racism here; I am a Pan-Nationalism who supports Post-Globalism. But I am arguing against anti-Racism, and all those who think will see I'm right and anti-Racists are fools.

When you think about it:

* Every major corporate is against racism;
* George W. Bush is against racism;
* Hippies are against racism;
* The super-wealthy are against racism;
* Hollywood is against racism;
* The church is against racism;
* Judaism is against racism;
* The prison system is against racism.

Is there anyone whose motives you trust who is against racism? No, they're all in it for the profit, or to make themselves feel good.

Anwar #racist splcenter.org

(some RSTDT some CTSTDT)

“The Political Cesspool, an overtly racist, anti-Semitic radio show hosted by self-avowed white nationalist James Edwards.”

Overtly racist? I don’t know about that. I think there’ plenty of racism there that’s not overt, but requires a reading between the lines to find, just like most Jewish anti-black racism. It’s not just other whites who are racists.

Brother Farrakhan has done the research and learned that Jews carried out the transatlantic slave trade that killed 100 million Africans, and Jews owned three-quarters of all slaves, and they kept the slave system functioning.

They injected the AIDS virus into black newborns too, and also punctured a hole in the ozone layer.

Too, the active and lasting Jewish participation in black civil rights efforts is strictly for self interests . By helping to integrate blacks, Jews managed to destroy the autonomous black economic institutions and took over the businesses for themselves.

By encouraging blacks to work within the system, rather than confront it, Jews kept them from escaping the strictures of white supremacy. In all, Jewish “bloodsuckers” have successfully blocked black advancement.

So if you’re going to expose white racists, just make sure you tell the whole truth and expose the Jews as well.

Blacks will soon control America and those who aren’t black are going to pay for their crimes.

Joey #racist realjewnews.com

I’ve always wondered if the “Central” in CIA means Central Bankers Intelligence Agency?

I don’t know but I do know the US outsources many things in the public sector including intelligence to Israel and the Rothschilds run Israel so how far a stretch would it be to say they don’t run the spook World too?

Does anyone know how the Jew bankers on Wall Street make money off the drug trade–has there ever been a quality documentary made?

I’ve heard a theory about it all that goes something like this–the spooks have a black budget that Congress cannot examine, verify, or in any way question.

Big time Jewish politicians created the black inner city ghettos and their political culture under LBJs “Great Society”.

Early Black street gang leaders were Marxist radicals. The spooks supposedly created crack cocaine among other illicit drugs for street level consumption.

Jewish record executives in Hollywood started pushing the rap music industry and its message of “sell drugs, getz fly girls, and blast up suckers who be messin’ wit yo hustle homie, rep your hood dawg, etc.”.

So, all these socially engineered Black kids living in the ghetto listen to rap and are into gang culture. so now some big Jew with access to government aircraft and foreign soil brings in massive quantities of substances which they meet up with the hood homie set leaders and distribute for profit sharing.

The drugs mess up the Black community and society in general but the Zionist handlers of the game get obscene profits of it all so they don’t care what happens to the “goys”. Does that seem like a reasonable theory on the reality of the drug culture and politics in America?

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

Knights of the Ku Klux Klan
The Ku Klux Klan, commonly referred to as the KKK, was purportedly founded on December 24, 1865, by six Confederate veterans in Pulaski, Tennessee during the Reconstruction Era post American Civil War. The secret society was first known as the "Kuklux Clan", a name derived from the combination of the Greek words “kyklos” (??????), meaning “clan” and “kuklos” (??????), meaning “circle”, inferring a circle or a band of brothers. Aside from term “Knights”, which has historically been used by orders affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church, the logo of the KKK bears a Roman Cross superimposed with an icon representative of the number “6” which equates to the letter "F" or the " ?" (i.e., the double-cross) in the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet). As witnessed by the numerous KKK members who were tried and convicted decades after their respective hate crimes, the double-cross is always in play. In other words, members of the KKK are routinely sacrificed once they have fulfilled their respective missions. Fifty years after its inception, the KKK re-established itself in Atlanta, Georgia in 1915 atop Stone Mountain. Founder William J. Simmons and other were members of the Knights of Mary Phagan, a secret society likely affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church. Consequently, the organization and its chapters adopted regalia featured in “The Birth of a Nation” (1915), including white costumes, robes, masks and conical hats which are coincidentally also Greco-Roman in origin. The KKK also began to use paraphernalia adorned with a white Roman Cross on a red shield. At its peak, Klan membership reportedly exceeded 4 million and was comprised of 20% of the adult white male population. However, as of 2012, the KKK was estimated to have between 5,000 and 8,000 members and 150 Klan chapters. It is classified as a hate group by the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center. Aside from the Southern Cross of New Orleans, Knights, orders and secret societies affiliated with the KKK include but are not limited to: the Bayou Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Church of the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan; the Imperial Klans of America, Knights of Mary Phagan, the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Knights of the White Camelia, the True Ku Klux Klan. the United Klans of America (UKA), the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, and the Women of the Ku Klux Klan.


KKK Under CIA Control
Similar to most secret societies (e.g., Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, etc.), the KKK claims that it is not one organization but rather that it is composed of small independent chapters. They also claim that they never operated under a centralized structure, despite the existence of the United Klans of America (UKA), one of the largest Ku Klux Klan organizations in the U.S. which admittedly had “tens of thousands” of members. Nevertheless, modern historical sources emphatically state that “there was little organizational structure above the local level”. Klan organizers entitled "Kleagles" reportedly traveled the country, signing up hundreds of new members who paid initiation fees, receiving KKK costumes in return. Historical sources state that “The organizer kept half the money and sent the rest to state or national officials”, further confirming a top down command structure within the KKK. Whether the Fraternal Order of the Eagles is connected to the Kleagles and the KKK is not known, but they both appeared in America around the same general time. The first national leader and Grand Wizard of the KKK, Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, boasted that the Klan was a nationwide organization of 550,000 men and that he could muster 40,000 Klansmen within 5 day notice. Needless to say, this would not be possible if there was no centralized structure within the Klan. Although the KKK claims to be an "invisible" group with no membership rosters, no chapters, and no local officers, in 1925 a Klansman was bribed for the secret membership list and subsequently exposed Klansmen running in the state primaries. Modern historical accounts even state that the so-called “second Klan was a formal fraternal organization, with a national and state structure”, rendering the aforementioned claims of independence obsolete. During the Civil Rights Movement in the American South, the KKK forged alliances with the police department in the South (e.g., Birmingham, Alabama) and with Southern governors (e.g., George Wallace of Alabama). The fact that they conspired with the state to commit acts of terror across the South confirms that the KKK was in fact a state-sponsored terrorist organization. According to historian Brian R. Farmer, "two-thirds of the national Klan lecturers were Protestant ministers”, a statistic which suggests that there was a federal program to incite hate across the South. It has also been revealed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has paid informants within the Klan who were active in Birmingham in the early 1960s. In 1964, the FBI's COINTELPRO program admittedly infiltrated and disrupted civil rights groups from within while the KKK attacked them publically. In other words, the FBI and the KKK worked in unison to destroy the Civil Rights Movement which was bringing black and white people together, a threat to the establishment and the status quo. The notion that the KKK is intimately affiliated with the FBI was further confirmed when Bill Wilkinson of the Invisible Empire, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, was revealed to have been working for the FBI. Due to the KKK’s uncanny ability to avoid prosecution for their hate crimes and their intimate relationship with the U.S. government, namely the FBI, it can be ascertained that the organization is highly organized and under command and control of the CIA of Switzerland.

KKK & Prohibition
The KKK’s allegiance to the U.S. government was never more apparent than during prohibition which decimated rural America’s self-sustainability and caused widespread economic damage the country. Historian Prendergast stated that the KKK’s "support for prohibition represented the single most important bond between Klansmen throughout the nation”. This confirms, albeit in a de facto manner, that the KKK was on the payroll of the U.S. government. In 1922, two hundred Klan members set fire to saloons in Union County, Arkansas, terrorizing the South. Their use of violence against bars, bootleggers and distilleries was widespread, working hand in hand with the U.S. government against the people of America.

KKK Legislation
In response to KKK-related violence, the U.S. federal government passed the Force Acts in 1870 and 1871 which were allegedly used to prosecute Klan crimes. However, in 1876, the Supreme Court of the United States eviscerated the Ku Klux Act in “United States v. Cruikshank” (1875) when they ruled that the federal government could no longer prosecute individuals although states would be forced to comply with federal civil rights provisions. The result was that African Americans were at the mercy of hostile state governments that refused to intervene against their own private paramilitary groups. In other words, there would be no federal prosecution of the Klan and therefore they could continue terrorizing the South as they pleased. Six years later, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in “United States v. Harris” (1882) that the Klan Act was partially unconstitutional. They stated that Congress's power under the Fourteenth Amendment did not extend to the right to regulate against private conspiracies. Again, the U.S. federal government openly allowed the Klan to operative with impunity, repealing all federal laws that could be used to prosecute them. Therefore, it must be concluded that the KKK was a federally funded program that they did not want to interrupt.

Terror Arm of Democratic Party
Evidence acquired to date indicates that the KKK was primarily used as the terror arm of the Democratic Party. According to historian Eric Foner: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party…Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society. It aimed to…destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life”. According to historical sources, “The members of the first Klan in the South were exclusively Democrats”, launching a "reign of terror against Republican leaders both black and white. Those political leaders assassinated during the campaign included Arkansas Congressman James M. Hinds, three members of the South Carolina legislature, and several men who served in constitutional conventions”. The Klan also attacked black members of the Loyal Leagues and intimidated southern Republicans and Freedmen's Bureau workers. They killed black political leaders, heads of families, and leaders of churches and community groups because they had prominent leadership roles in society. In North and South Carolina alone, within an 18-month period from ending in June of 1867, there were 197 murders and 548 cases of aggravated assault”. To add insult to injury, the KKK made people vote Democratic and gave them certificates of the fact. Again, the KKK was working hand in hand with a state-sponsored political party, further confirming that they themselves were in fact state-sponsored.

KKK Cover
Although a federal grand jury determined that the Klan was a "terrorist organization” in 1870, its member remained free to terrorize the South for over a century. Reason being, the KKK was a cover for federal intelligence operation being executed in the South. If a politician or labor party leader needed to be assassinated, their subsequent murder would be blamed on the Klan. In other words, the KKK was the scapegoat for thousands of acts of state-sponsored terrorism. The notion that the KKK was nothing more than federal cover was corroborated by historical sources which state in-part: “Many people not formally inducted into the Klan had used the Klan's costume for anonymity, to hide their identities when carrying out acts of violence…While people used the Klan as a mask for nonpolitical crimes, state and local governments seldom acted against them.” The fact that the government did not prosecute said crime further confirms that the KKK was a state-sponsored organization. This notion was also substantiated by a Georgia-based reporter who wrote in 1870: "A true statement of the case is not that the Ku Klux are an organized band of licensed criminals, but that men who commit crimes call themselves Ku Klux.” Historical sources also state that: “The "Ku Klux Klan" name was used by a numerous independent local groups opposing the Civil Rights Movement and desegregation, especially in the 1950s and 1960s.”

“The Birth of a Nation”
Just prior to the Ku Klux Klan re-establishing itself atop Stone Mountain in Georgia, a film entitled “The Birth of a Nation” (1915) was released nationwide on February 8, 1915. In short, the film served as the advertisement for the new and improved KKK. The film was allegedly based on Thomas Dixon, Jr.’s book “The Leopard's Spots” (1902), as well as his book and play entitled “The Clansman” (1905). Dixon stated that his purpose was "to revolutionize northern sentiment by a presentation of history that would transform every man in my audience into a good Democrat!" In other words, his work was designed to reignite racial and political tension between the North and South along the lines of the previously fought American Civil War. In “The Clansman”, Dixon falsely claimed that the KKK had used burning crosses when rallying to fight against Reconstruction. Nevertheless, film director D. W. Griffith repeatedly portrayed an upright Roman Cross on fire in “The Birth of a Nation” rather than the St. Andrew's cross which was historically accurate. Due to the movie, a burning Roman Cross has been associated with the Klan ever since. Consequently, William J. Simmons displayed an upright burning Roman Cross atop Stone Mountain during the KKK’s second founding. Because “The Birth of a Nation” (see movie) was a Hollywood propaganda film that mythologized and glorified the Ku Klux Klan, it made the terrorist organization a household name overnight. The film is credited with single-handedly reviving the KKK in America. By portraying the Ku Klux Klan a heroic force, the film created an artificially induced Klan craze, exactly as it was designed to do. Needless to say, the movie has been used as a recruiting tool by the KKK ever since. At the official premiere in Atlanta, Georgia, members of the Klan rode up and down the street on horses in front of the theater, a publicity stunt designed to invoke fear in the South. As depicted in the movie poster for “The Birth of a Nation”, much of the modern Klan's iconography, including the standardized white costume, the white cross on a red shield, and the burning cross, were all derived from the film. Under Democratic U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, the “The Birth of a Nation” was the first motion picture to be screened at the White House. In order to create even more racial tension and turmoil in America, Wilson, a Southerner, endorsed the film. According to a Hollywood press agent, Wilson stated after watching the film, "It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true”. Naturally, Wilson's alleged remarks generated a national scandal, causing Wilson’s staff issued an official denial on April 30, 1915. According to a press release from Wilson's aide, Joseph Tumulty, "The President was entirely unaware of the nature of the play before it was presented and at no time has expressed his approbation of it”. Due to its phenomenal success in causing unprecedented racial division in America, the “The Birth of a Nation” is often ranked as one of the greatest American films of all time.

Anti-Catholic Agenda
In order to publically disassociate itself from the Roman Catholic Church, it’s alleged founder and funder, the Ku Klux Klan has disseminated various forms of anti-Catholic propaganda, especially since its second founding in 1915. Shortly after the pro-KKK Hollywood propaganda film entitled “The Birth of a Nation” (1915) was released in America, the KKK suddenly focused on the impending threat of teh Catholic Church, resorting to anti-Catholicism and nativism. Although a book entitled “Klansmen: Guardians of Liberty” (1926) was allegedly responsible for fostering the Anti-Catholic sediment, it’s far more likely that the Catholic Church wanted to distance itself from the KKK after funding the aforementioned film which generated an uncontrollable and unpredictable KKK movement. In a cartoon from 1926, the Ku Klux Klan is depicted chasing the Roman Catholic Church (personified by St. Patrick) from the shores of America. The "snakes" in the cartoon are labeled with the negative attributes of the Church, including superstition, union of church and state, control of public schools, and intolerance. In another carton from 1926 entitled "The End", a KKK member is depicted with an American flag and a Bible sitting atop a fat Roman Catholic priest. Historian Roger K. Newman stated that KKK politician Hugo Black "disliked the Catholic Church as an institution" and gave over 100 anti-Catholic speeches at KKK meetings in Alabama during his 1926 U.S. senate campaign. Black was subsequently rewarded for anti-Catholic rhetoric when he was elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate later that year. Although Black said he left the Klan when he became a senator, it is highly unlikely. In 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed Black to the U.S. Supreme Court despite his activity in the Klan.

KKK Bombings
During the Civil Rights Movement and the days of Martin Luther King, Jr., there were so many Klan bombings in Birmingham, Alabama, that the city's nickname was "Bombingham". During the tenure of Bull Connor, the police commissioner of Birmingham, Alabama, Klan groups were closely allied with the police and operated with impunity, showing once again that the KKK was and is a state-sponsored terrorist organization. In states such as Alabama and Mississippi, Klan members also forged alliances with the governors' administrations. When the Freedom Riders arrived in Birmingham, Connor gave Klan members 15 minutes to attack the riders before sending in the police to quell the attack. In Birmingham and elsewhere, the KKK bombed the houses of civil rights activists, also using physical violence, intimidation and executing assassinations. According to a report from the Southern Regional Council in Atlanta, the homes of 40 black Southern families were bombed between 1951 and 1952. The Ku Kulx Klan was responsible for numerous murders during the Civil Rights Movement, including but not limited to: the 1951 Christmas Eve bombing of the home of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) activists Harry and Harriette Moore in Mims, Florida, resulting in their deaths; the 1957 murder of Willie Edwards, Jr. Klansmen forced Edwards to jump to his death from a bridge into the Alabama River; the 1963 assassination of NAACP organizer Medgar Evers in Mississippi; the 1963 bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, which killed four African-American girls; the 1964 murders of three civil rights workers, Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner, in Mississippi; the 1964 murder of two black teenagers, Henry Hezekiah Dee and Charles Eddie Moore in Mississippi; the 1965 murder of Viola Liuzzo was transporting Civil Rights Marchers in Alabama; and the 1966 firebombing death of NAACP leader Vernon Dahmer Sr., 58, in Mississippi.

Knights of the White Camelia
The Knights of the White Camelia was purportedly founded on May 22, 1867 in Franklin, Louisiana by Colonel Alcibiades DeBlanc, a Confederate veteran. The name was derived from a snow-white flower of the genus Camellia, an apparent reference to the required skin color of its members. The secret society supported white supremacy, opposed to the Republican Party, and was very similar to the Ku Klux Klan with whom it associated with. Unlike the Klan however, which drew much of its membership from lower-class southerners and Confederate veterans, members of the Knights of White Camelia were mainly upper crust southerners, including doctors, landowners, newspaper editors, and officers. By 1870, the original Knights of the White Camelia allegedly ceased to exist. Like so many other secret societies, their alleged demise has likely been exaggerated. In other words, the Order appears to have gone undercover. Louisiana Judge Taylor Beattie, who led the Thibodaux massacre of 1887, and David Theophilus Stafford, the Louisiana adjutant general, were both member so the Order. In 1939, TIME magazine quoted West Virginian George E. Deatherage as saying that he was the "national commander of the Knights of the White Camellia", suggesting that the Order is alive and well. Based on their use of the Roman Cross and their close relationship with the Ku Klux Klan, it can be ascertained that the Order was founded and sanctioned by the Roman Catholic Church.

Mack Major #fundie mackmajorbooks.com

WELCOME TO WAKANDA: The Mass Initiation Of Black Folk Into Witchcraft

"As it is written: "God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that could not see and ears that could not hear, to this very day." [Romans 8:11]

" For the LORD hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers, the seers hath he covered." [Isaiah 29:10]

So how many of you ran out to get initiated into witchcraft through The Black Panther movie? You do know that was what this was about, right?

It was a mass initiation ceremony to take black Americans in particular away from your own biblical heroes and faith in Jesus Christ, and usher you into the myth-making world of fake-believe and occultism.

I wonder how many demons got accepted into people’s hearts that day?

Never seen anything like it! Black folks playing dress up, buying costumes, spending $20 a ticket (can't afford to donate or buy my ebooks though), and running around talking about Wakanda—some fake country made up out of thin air.

Side note: How you gon' know more about the made-up nation of Wakanda, yet know nothing about the real nations of Africa, like Rwanda??? You know all about Wakanda, yet nothing about Botswana, Burkin Faso, Chad, or Tanzania. If travel agencies start selling vacation packages to Wakanda right now, there'd be so many black folks lining up to go it would be embarrassing. But ask them when's the last time they booked a vacay to somewhere other than South Africa: and you'll hear nothing but crickets.

Black folks are in movie theaters holding invocation ceremonies and prayer circles while watching this mess, literally going all out to indulge in this feel-good fantasy created by the same white folks in Hollywood who've always painted you with the broad brush of racism and inferiority.

And weren't black people just protesting Hollywood a few years ago? Now they're suddenly your friends again because they gave you a fictional hero movie? Black folks sure are easy! I just hope this many black people practice their newfound fondness for supporting movies with majority black casts by supporting the next Spike Lee or Tyler Perry movie when they come out.

To date, Black Panther has made over $500,000,000 at the box office. That's half a BILLION DOLLARS! $200M of that was on opening weekend alone. To my knowledge neither Tyler, Spike nor any other black movie maker has ever gotten a $200 Million opening weekend movie release by black movie goers. As in never. But Marvel comics sure did. And last I checked, none of their board of directors represented the race of the people who just made them a whole lot richer.

Remember that the next time you hear black folks crying about how we need to support black businesses. Imagine what half a BILLION dollars could've done to turn around some of these jacked up under-performing black schools in urban areas.

Imagine how many urban communities could've been revamped and revitalized with that sort of investment! Shoot: we could've paid off all the debts of Morris Brown college and opened up two more HBCU's with that sort of money!

Instead, it went to a Hollywood movie owned by majority white investors. Really let that sink in.

And black folks have been some of the loudest critics of black churches not pouring enough money back into black communities. How is this blatant display of waste over a movie any different?

The problem with us is that we like to be where the crowd of other black people are going. If it's popular we want in. But that's just the problem: a lot of black folks are also going to Hell! And according to scripture it’s a very popular place to be. Will you follow the crowd of black folks there too?

My dear black people—especially my black Christians: your great enemy isn't the white man. It's not some 'ism' or ideology that exists in this world. Your greatest enemy is THE DEVIL—particularly the one you've allowed to exist in your own head. You need to exorcise the devil of ignorance and blind racial identity out of your mind, before it destroys you.

One last thing. Take a look at this thing in the image to this article. The cat-man costume. Looks a lot like a demon, does it not? Yea, I thought so too. Black cats have always been used by witches in conjunction with black magic to cast spells and bring harm onto the unsuspecting.

That alone should give you pause to think why this movie was pushed so hard on the black community by occult Hollywood. You've been placed under a direct spell and don't even know it!

Quit falling for the hype. Repent, and ask Christ to forgive you for being so silly and eager to be led astray that you willingly walked right into a witchcraft induction ceremony and got completely caught up in the moment. Ask the Lord to purge you and to give you more wisdom to see what the enemy is really up to. That way you won't be led away from Christ and so easily led into witchcraft and eternal damnation.

** We are entering a time of mass deception on a level not seen before. Many Christians will be led astray in this hour into eternal damnation and be lost due to identifying more with their flesh and the world than with the nature of Jesus Christ. Don't get caught up in the hype of pop culture. Satan is on a seek and destroy mission: and YOU are in his cross-hairs!

Download a copy of my ebook DEFEATING BLACK ANTICHRIST: Demolishing the Myth That Christianity is the Oppressor's Religion. This ebook will strengthen your faith in Jesus Christ and help you avoid the lies and deceptions that are rampant in the world today. And no, it's not on a discount or on any sale. Just like you purchased those tickets to go see the Black Panther movie at full price, you'll have to pay full price to undo the spell that mess more than likely placed on your mind.

Satan wants to separate you from your faith and confidence in Jesus Christ. DON'T LET HIM WIN. Defeat him in his plans by downloading and reading the ebook NOW. Click the button below.

Mike King #racist tomatobubble.com

Have "youse guys" heard the hype about the anticipated "box office sensation," coming out in theatres this weekend? Unlike so may other hyped-up films which turn into box-office duds, we suspect that 'Black Panther' might actually sell a whole lot of tickets for the same reason that so many Blacks turned out to vote for Black Jesus in 2008 and 2012. It's a "cultural" thing, engineered by the usual suspects for the purpose of firing up their Black legions with anti-White hatred. Indeed, pre-ticket sales for BP have already outsold those for any other Marvel super-hero movie.

The author of this Slimes review, Carvell Wallace, gives us a glimpse as to what's going on here. Get a whiff of these excerpted bits of Bolshevik barf, from the Slimes review:

"Here in Oakland, I am doing what it seems every other black person in the country is doing: assembling my delegation ... We bought tickets for the opening as soon as they were available — the first time in my life I’ve done that.

We have for centuries sought to either find or create a promised land where we would be untroubled by the criminal horrors of our American existence.

The artistic movement called Afrofuturism, a decidedly black creation, is meant to go far beyond the limitations of the white imagination. It isn’t just the idea that black people will exist in the future, will use technology and science, will travel deep into space."

1 & 2. Slimes anti-White reviewer and group-ticket organizer "Carvell" Wallace. Evidently, his momma named him after an ice-cream cake, and misspelled the name to boot! 3. The expected success of the film is the product of Jewish hype and Black anti-Whiteness. Let's hope the mania passes peacefully.

Reviews, summaries and trailers indicate that 'Black Panther' contains lots of fighting and lots of killing. Though the film itself has a virtually all-Black cast, which suggests that the violence is Black-on-Black; the illusion-makers of Hollywood (cough cough) and the promoters in the Piranha Press (cough cough) damn well know that the film will stoke the flames of hatred and violence against Whitey nonetheless.

Our advice to you "crackas" who still attend theaters, or are simply planning on shopping at an attached mall while BP is playing -- stay away, or least carry a handgun with you (if your state allows concealed carry). Now we truly do love, appreciate and embrace our tiny (really tiny) handful of Black reader / donors as "bruthas" and "sistas" under God; but "y'all" know even better than we how excitable some of your peeps can get. No White man who values his safety and that of his loved ones will want to be in the vicinity when a theatre that is showing BP vomits out its agitated contents at closing time..

As for the futuristic plot, it is as fantastical as it is comical. After the murder of the king of the African Kingdom of Wakanda, the dead king's son, T'Challa, (aka Black Panther), returns to Wakanda to assume his rightful place as king of a great civilization with secret advanced technology (rolling eyes). When powerful enemies seeking to capture Wakands's technology and exploit its natural resources challenge King T'Challa, he is drawn into a war that holds the fate of Wakanda in the balance. The young king wears an indestructible Black Panther suit made of "vibranium" (oh that African technology!) and battles the evil-doers on behalf of his people.

Fight scenes and Black warriors will fire-up the audience -- and don't think for one minute that just because the fighting is Black-on-Black that the movie won't foment violent Black ethno-nationalism rooted in anti-White sentiment.

It's important to note that in 1966, at a time when the real Black Panthers were murdering police officers and setting cities aflame, Marvel Comics’s Black Panther was created by Stan Lee (cough cough) and Jack Kirby (cough cough). Fast-forward to today's movie version, Ryan Coogler is the Black director and co-writer of the script. The production company is Marvel Studios (cough cough) and the distributors of BP is Disney Studios (cough cough). It's not too hard to figure out what is going on here.

Black Panther, the movie, is just another case of the usual suspects using Blacks as a battering ram against White western civilization. White people will be viciously attacked and murdered as a result of this communist crap. Even if no one is harmed directly by theater mobs in the coming days, to the extent that this garbage infuses simple-minded viewers with a sense of ethnic-based warrior aggressiveness, the film will, as intended, indirectly and latently contribute to future violence against Whites. Bet on it!

1 & 2. Stan Lee (cough cough) created a Black Panther comic book series. His fellow tribesmen are behind the movie version. 3. Black director-writer Ryan Coogler --- ah, show us the shekels, Ryan, show us the shekels.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read a movie review about the Black Panther movie coming out this weekend. It's expected to do extremely well at the box office.

Boobus Americanus 2: It sounds very interesting. I'd like go see that.

Sugar: Yess, Boobuss! Pleasse go! And make ssure the theater is near a city. And take your sstupid frickin' ssuburban family with you. That experience ought to cure your libtardissm right quick.

Editor: I once knew a libtarded young Asian-American woman who was so proud of herself for having taken a job in an inner city High School. After a female student grabbed her hair and dragged her down a flight of stairs, she woke up to reality and was cured 'right quick' as you say.

LaChoenda #fundie forums.shreveporttimes.com

It is a very, very sad day indeed when people exist such as those posting comments for this article.

The whole story has not necessarily been told. There are many possibilities.

When I was a little girl if I was misbehaving or acting up with my friends enough to irritate the bus driver we would all be forced to sit at the front of the bus so the driver could keep a close eye on us. Kids obviously hated being up front.

Who's to say the white kids weren't misbehaving in some way and were made to sit up front for that reason and thus the black students had to sit in the rear?

Why do blacks automatically assume racism?

Why do blacks automatically assume the victim role?

This victim's mentality must stop. It is a chain that holds us all back. I am disgusted when I see my brothers and sisters knee jerk reactions to anything that could be perceived as racism. Anything that could be perceived as "holding us down" which, as everybody else knows, is just a form of excuse.

I will not pass judgment until I have heard the whole story from both sides, however I will pass judgment now on the people looking to use this story as an excuse to assume their favorite role of victim.

You are the problem.

Jared Taylor #racist #wingnut amren.com

We Are Ruled by Fools

And we are a nation of cowards.

The protests and riots over the death of George Floyd have had remarkable results. One has been rituals of subservience by whites. In New York City, hundreds of white people knelt and repeated degrading slogans shouted at them by a black man. [00:9 – 00:24] They also chanted that the solution was not voting but revolution.

The white police chief of Webster, Massachusetts, went face-down on the pavement during a Black Lives Matter protest. One black shouted, “It’s not enough, but it’s a start.”

In Cary, North Carolina, white police officers washed the feet of a black pastor and his wife.

Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer, and other Democrats knelt and observed nine minutes of silence to “honor George Floyd.”.

In Bethesda, whites repeated what sounded like a new profession of faith. [0:00 – 0:22] Black protest and the fight against that will o’ the wisp known as “systemic racism” has become like a religion.

Maybe that’s why no one dares punish rioters. In Washington, prosecutors dropped charges against virtually every person the police brought in on a felony rioting charge. Fort Worth Police also dropped rioting charges against protesters. The Manhattan DA decided not to prosecute protesters for low-level offences, including unlawful assembly and disorderly conduct. That’s just as well for Chiara de Blasio, the daughter of the Mayor Bill de Blasio. She was facing those very charges.

It may be that all white men are as bad as Frank Rizzo. The theory today is that we are all racists and that even the best intentioned whites can’t help propping up white supremacy. That thinking logically leads to signs like this one, which says, “Haiti did it in 1804. This is just Round 2. What happened in 1804? Blacks slaughtered all the whites on the island.

Here’s another Black Lives Matter sign: “We are not like our ancestors. We will Fuck you up.” This lady seems to have a broader program in mind than merely justice for George Floyd.

One expert estimates that the damage, looting, and business losses for Target during the protests were $50 to $100 million. What’s the solution? Target has pledged $10 million to “help heal,” as the company put it, and promised 10,000 hours of free consulting to people of color who own small businesses. Only to people of color. Don’t even ask if you’re white.

The Financial Times noted that “US companies flood civil rights groups with donations.” The paper has a table of corporate pledges that total more than $485 million. The list isn’t complete. Apple and YouTube are each going to spend $100 million to fight racism. The beauty company Glossier pledged $1 million that the Financial Times didn’t know about, and I’m sure there’s a lot more. The eventual total could be – what? — 1 billion? 2 billion? American companies are laying off millions and millions of people. And they are giving millions and millions of dollars to the folks who rioted, looted, and burned their businesses.

It seems that every organization in the country is preening itself on racial sensitivity. The principal of my daughter’s high school sent all us parents a message about what he called, “the heinous acts of racism and hate that have occurred in our country.” The Yale Club of Washington DC wrote to tell me, “We can only begin to understand the daily pain of our black peers. Institutional racism, inequity, and injustice are unacceptable.” A friend got a message that said, “the Minnesota Orchestra will reduce our reliance on and reproduction of white privilege and will disrupt our own role in systemic racism.” What have these musicians, in their masks, standing eight feet apart, ever done that was remotely racist?

The rules change when you protest against the public health crisis of racism. Perhaps you saw that over 1,000 health professionals had written a public letter about the demonstrations, saying, “We do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission. We support them as vital to the national public health.” But they said any other demonstrations are bad, especially if you are out of work and protesting a lockdown order. We’re supposed to stay indoors even if it kills the economy, but go ahead and catch Covid or give to someone else if it’s in the name of George Floyd.

White people everywhere were caught up in this festival of guilt and capitulation. Here is Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — in the middle wearing just the right mask – for a Black Lives Matter rally. Along with aides, he knelt in tribute to George Floyd.

These lads in Brussels tore a traffic signal off a pole and threw it at the police. [0:00 to 0:11] With the Brussels police occupied, looting went on in high spirits. [0:22 – 0:35] The London police ran away from demonstrators.” [00:10 – 00:41] A statue of Belgian King Leopold II had to be vandalized and torn down because . . . well, I’m sure you know why.

The BBC sent this astonishing tweet: “27 police officer injured during largely peaceful anti-racism protests in London.” Looks very peaceful.

Here’s the main lesson from all of this: Violence works. Rioting works. If you burn down enough buildings you get what you want. What if blacks had seen the video of George Floyd’s death and quietly waited for the investigation, indictment, trail, and verdict. That’s what white people did when a black Minneapolis policeman shot and killed an unarmed white women. It’s the civilized thing to do. But if blacks and their hopped up “white allies” had done the civilized thing, there wouldn’t be a billion dollars splashed out for black causes, would there? There wouldn’t be monuments to white men coming down all over the country. There wouldn’t be white people on their knees, washing the feet of black people.

Are our rulers such fools they don’t know that if you give in to a child’s temper tantrum, you get more tantrums? Don’t they understand that if you bow to the mob, you get more mobs. I guess they don’t. Our rulers really are . . . fools.

Yngvi #racist englisc-gateway.com

Well there are hundred's and thousands of kids across Europe turning into whiggers, dumping their own ancient culture and adopting another. Why?

Media influence? Music? Education system? White guilt? The fear of Black? What is it that's driving so many kids to become Whiggers?

She was a victim not only of rape and murder but of the 21st century society.

But how do we fix it? - We promote our cultures in a good light, create role models, build preservation trusts, free books for schools, teach our children their own roots, train our people to take place in positions of power, share a cultural belief or religion, promote our own style and music, share knowledge, bring friends and family to the attention of sites like this, use our life time to dedicate ourselves towards helping the cause, set up cultural events, bring back our ancient traditions, get to know our neighbours and build community spirit, understand our rights as an ethnic people, learn our English common laws - be steadfast and use our own true laws against the false and illegal EU laws, show people the damage that multiculturalism has caused to this country and others, create an alliance with all other Germanic lands, build relationships with our children to build trust and ensure they are not being forced into the liberal way of thinking by their teachers and friends who's parents may be liberals, stop our children buying rap genre music or wearing said clothing. Distance ourselves from the main stream and use historical idols our children can inspire to be like (such as Hereward and Hengist & Horsa), have a white history month, a music of white origin awards, a white beauty contest, set up more white peoples charities, uphold the freedom of speech and teach our children not to be afraid to speak their own mind, release a blockbuster film that promotes an English hero with an all English cast, expose white slavery, use the race card whenever possible, boycott anything that doesn't fit in with our ethnicity....

Basically we play them at their own game!

Asian Males, the True 1%'ers #racist youtube.com

Mongol LIBERATIONS. Western "History" is very Light on Asian influence. Asia has been Guiding europe since the 1200's. Remember, WE came to YOU first.Genghis Khan saved your RACE from Extinction., who do you think stopped the Muslim onslaught. Muslim Slave raiders were going as far as Denmark without Resistance, Taking Women, esp. with Blonde hair and Children.. Islam spread like Wildfire in the 1000-1200's. And the Golden horde put an END to that. The PAX Mongolia , gave YOU , 300 yrs of Peace. ALL White Males speak of the PAX Romana..The Romans Castrated, Enslaved, Conquered, colonized, Destroyed the Native culture and religion. But, The Mongols, Set up the First, Police stations, Markets,Tax offices, a Unified Bureaucracy, that Never existed before.But NEVER Colonized, Enslaved,. In fact ALLOWED many Ethnic Minority europeans who would have dIED off to exist. "Follow your Own Cultures, Religions"..why do you think so Many fought under the Hordes Banner,
Slavery from Women from one CULTURE to another, a Arab Hallmark, was BANNED. Rape in WAR was Banned. a Tool of War in the West. The Fable "peeping tom", naked Female riding through town? Thats a True story. But not of White Males..The Golden Horde. It was said "A Naked Female(White, Indian, Arab,) could walk through the Horde, UNTOUCHED. Or the soldiers faced Execution. CHIVALRY, the BOW and curtsy , Falconry, ARMOR etc. came from the Horde and Asia. Why do you think SO many White Females left with the Horde Back east. Arab historians wrote of ODD sightings " Dressed White Females on top of horses in finery, being led by a Male of the east.
Why do you think HITLER thought so Highly of the EAST. Remember, the Lost city of Atlantis MUST be in the East. He sent expiditions . Indiana Jones was Based on that, but the East is White Washed..as Always.. "What if the East arrived in Europe in the 300's and NOT in the 1200's". Meaning, what if the East came before the Roman Colonists.
Contact with the Mongols , Not Only Led to Peace in Europe. But Strengthened europe .and also led to Diplomatic Relation with the Rest of Asia.. Many of the Horde consisted of Chinese and Koreans..the SILK ROAD Creators, Enforcers and Mercenaries.Again, How come the Silk road is Non existent in Western "History". the Silk Road Ended in ROMA,.The silk road began in 500 B.C. Lets not forget ALL the Technology and Civilization. Which led to Europes Renaissance from China and the Age of Reason from Joseon (Korea).
The MING dynasty were the Mongols . The Fork, the typical New england home..Raised stone Foundation, Wooden floors, Timber frame, Paper walls,Ceramic tiled A frame roof, Cosmetics, Dress, Printing Press/Paper, a MERITOCRACY, ask the English protestants where the Idea for a Country Without a social caste, Without Religion But Knowledge. Read the constitution Well. Franklin, Jefferson, Washington etc, Despised religion, Social caste system. "WE are No longer EUROPEANS". and a Million Other thingsALL from the Mongols , which then led to Asia as a whole.
Learn a litl;e bit more of Asian history and Influence in Europe. Because without the Mongols, Asia..You should be living like your European brothers..the Arab-European, Indo -European. ''India and the Arab world. The Indos, India CREATED the Indo-European Languages and Cultures.
The Assyrians, Babylonians were directly Influenced by the Indos.
The ARYANS are a Northern Indian tribe. The INDO-ARYANS. White euroipeans can directly link themselves to Northern indians..HITLER proved this..The Aryan RACE. But Hitler also said, The EAST was ITS Culture, "The First and LAST bastion of Civilization will be in the East",
LEARN More of your Own Western "History". Because you werent Taught in school. The FORK was a White European Invention? LOL. Never seen a Viking eating with a FORK. Look at a Fork..4 "chopsticks " Binded together.
Remove ALL Eastern Influence from european "culture"? Whats left is India and the Middle east. Asia influenced the West, Not the other way around. A Culture without Religion but instead based on Philosophies and Self reflection..Accountability., Based on education and knowledge, A meritocracy based on a Persons Merit and character rather than Birth, a Fluid Social caste,..the Hallmarks of a "Civilized" society. One the West is Proud of? That has been in Asia for over 3,000 yrs...Just like the Mongols spread in Europe. The ONLY difference is the White europeans were smart enough to assimilate it , unlike the Arab european and INDO -european. who never did from the East.?

Strivingsoul #racist en.wikipedia.org

(This fundie is talking about David Duke)

He claims that every people have a right to preserve their heritage. And that multi-culturalism leads to ethnic tension and conflict and destruction of distinct cultural traits of each people. We may not agree with him but he's making a compelling case for his view, and this is unfair to rush to frame it as racism simply because he is against massive aggressive immigration into Europe and America. He also cites Jewish sources which show how multi-culturalism was promoted by Jewish organizations in order to weaken the Christian culture of America. On a related topic, here is one of the Jewish sources he directly quotes that you can see for yourself.

The Jewish author admits and brags about their role in the notorious porn-industry and its dark anti-Christian goals: Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. (This is really interesting for me, since this is a pattern I have myself witnessed in another case. Israeli Prime Minister Netanhayu had also advocated regime change in Iran back in 2002 through cultural and moral subversion -- by advocating beaming hedonist and degenerate Hollywood productions by a gay Jewish director into Iran in order to corrupt Iranian youths until they revolt against their Islamic government). Just as evident in this example, his book primarily draws from Jewish sources to present his thesis.

Most of the book content are NOT his opinions but just quotes after quotes! He is not also claiming there's a crazy conspiracy theory but that Jews have an enormous influence over US media and politics and therefore deeply influence the US culture and politics. And again he backs up his claim by providing testimony from Jews themselves. Here is one of the testimonies he quotes from a Jewish author: I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe "the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews," down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood. So we can probably suggest that this guy talking about "total control of Hollywood by Jews" is a self-hating anti-Semitic Jew!!

And I'll also be happy if you show me a Duke's recent statement that says Whites are superior to non-whites. There could've been such statements coming from him during his youth where he held more radical views, but I've not seen any statement along that vein in those of his works or articles over the last two decades that I have studied.

Alastair Goodland #fundie new2torah.com

(Reply to an article claiming that the Starbucks mermaid is a pagan symbol)

Interesting that the first photo graph insert in your story, the goddess is lactating – milk from her breasts. Milk goddess stories are found in many of the ancient cultures – pre columbian american as well as indian. The milk relates to the churning of the primal elements that were churned up by the (devas – demons) in the Bhagavata, It is a creation myth of course. There are a myriad of cults that have sprung up around the world in ancient cultures related to milk, involving fig trees (sap seen as milk), cactus (from which pulk is made for ceremonial purposes). Anyway, your point is true my friend. Many christians just don’t know what they worship today, because they just don’t read. They rely on what the little chap behind the pulpit tells them each sunday, and, their pastors are so dull themselves, they make points like drunkards with thornbushes.

God bless you, keep up the good work.

Hunter Wallace #racist occidentaldissent.com

[Commenting under "Obama Speaks At MLK Statue Dedication"]

White has always been a synonym for “Southern.”

In Dixie, whiteness was meaningful and important because our entire civilization was based on the racial caste system and plantation slavery. In a multiracial society, complexion became a logical marker of ethnic identity.

“Whiteness” was something that separated and unified Southerners from Indians and Africans. The ideal evolved in Tidewater in the mid-seventeenth century and it was brought to South Carolina from Barbados in the late seventeenth century. It spread from there across the Southeast.

Where would anyone get the idea that “White people” are their in group? Where would anyone dream of expelling all non-Whites from their midst?

This is a distinctively Southern concept. It is a cultural artifact of the South’s racial caste system where every single White man was socially superior to a nigger, where no nigger could ever lay his hands on a White woman, and where Whites were culturally expected to practice racial egalitarianism toward other Whites.

The idea has a long pedigree in the South. Under Andrew Jackson, the Democracy was explicitly the “White man’s party.” For over a century, Dixie was known within America as the “White Man’s Country.” Until the 1960s, the Alabama Democratic Party had a symbol of a white rooster with the motto of “white supremacy.”

These ideas didn’t come out of nowhere:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/eyesontheprize/reflect/r06_tactics.html

“George Wallace was then head of the Alabama Democratic party. The Alabama Democratic party was racist. Its symbol at that time had a white rooster, a white cock, and the words “White Supremacy.” That was the official emblem of the Democratic party of Alabama. So here it would be easy for us to tell our people, “Hey, look, this party is not for us. We need our own party.”

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child #racist 3edgesword.blogspot.com

[From "If Vitamin N was a thing they'd be fine"]

Why is it that niggers are so much more likely to die of the Wuhan Flu?†

Left-wing media asks "could it be racism"? Of course. No, not of course that's the reason but of course they asked. They have a little cottage industry entirely devoted to asking that question constantly whether it makes sense to or not. Zoe Carpenter at The Nation writes "What We Know About the Covid-19 Race Gap" with the hilariously ironic sub-title "The CDC is finally releasing more data that show just how unequal the toll of the pandemic is. But we can’t stop there". One of the things we don't know about the "race gap" is whether or not it's even unequal. To know that, you have to surmise that the death toll is related to the medical care and not the virus itself. Zoe/Zoë Carpenter doesn't have a clue about that: she pretends to but she's lying.

Covid-19 is retracing patterns of disease and death long documented by public health experts, who have found that black Americans are more likely than whites to suffer from a variety of illnesses and chronic conditions—such as diabetes and hypertension, common comorbidities in Covid-19 hospitalizations—and to die prematurely. While some treat these disparities as a mystery (“Why is it that the African American community is so much, you know, numerous times more [likely to die] than everybody else?… It doesn’t make sense,” President Trump said recently), there’s a robust body of research indicating that systemic racism and its related stress exact a physical toll that compounds over a lifetime.

Robust body of evidence, eh? The dumb little witch can't even point to a robust body of evidence that "systemic racism" even exists outside the fervent delusions of biased social scientists, let alone that it has some sort of physical aspect.

† Maybe that sentence already answers itself: the Red Chinese manufactured the virus and they don't like niggers, a problem which has flared up in Wuhan before...

If you think The Nation and their ilk are ridiculous on this topic consider that MedPage Today went one further:

Comorbidities like hypertension and diabetes, which are tied to COVID-19 complications, disproportionately affect the black community. But the alarming rates at which COVID-19 is killing black Americans extends beyond these comorbidities and can be attributed to decades of spatial segregation, inequitable access to testing and treatment, and withholding racial/ethnicity data from reports on virus outcomes.

"There is nothing different biologically about race. It is the conditions of our lives," said Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, PhD, former president of the American Public Health Association. "We have to acknowledge that now and always."

Predominantly black U.S. counties are experiencing a three-fold higher infection rate and a six-fold higher death rate than predominantly white counties.

Many of these communities are located in poor areas with high housing density, limited access to education, and high unemployment rates. Low socioeconomic status is independently a risk factor for poorer health outcomes and is forcing some individuals residing in these communities out of their homes and into the workforce.


"There is nothing different biological about race". That's literally what a medical doctor wrote. Does Jones think that white doctors are just randomly painting nigger babies black so they match the parents (who were previously painted by a white doctor a generation earlier)? No biological differences whatsoever eh? Is that why Summer Olympic land-based events look like a President Monkey family reunion while aquatic events look like a Bernie Sanders volunteer bank? A massive selection effect not motivated at all by different biological factors? It's even more circumspect when you compare the previous paragraph acknowledging that COVID comorbidities are more common among American blacks than American whites. It's said (though not backed up by any data or indeed the quoted ravings of any so-called experts) that comorbidities (or maybe just these two?) have already been factored in. [is it fair to ask if the same people acknowledge it makes sense to factor in likelihood of committing a crime when looking at incarceration rates? -ed]. All comorbidities? How can that be when, as we noted when The Nation was making stuff up for their article, we don't yet have a full understanding of all the comorbidities. Maybe there will be an obvious genetic flag or six when 23andMe finishes stealing your most personal of personal information, maybe it'll take more time than that. Maybe we'll only be able to answer this question in 2025. It might turn out that particular diets (*cough* *cough*friedchicken*cough* *cough*) exasperate the disease, or some environmental factors that aren't yet well understood. It might be that the supposed link between "low socioeconomic status"‡ and Coronavirus is weak and inverse and only because other factors swamp it that we were lead down the wrong track.

‡ Speaking of low socioeconomic status, do you want to know what likely will not make American negroes less poor? Refusing to go to work when other (white) people do and gain more income and experience and gratitude of their bosses. CBC won't tell you that...

One little tidbit that's worth noting is there seems to be a link between Vitamin D and the Wuhan Flu. While it may be simply correlation without causality (author Divya Ramaswamy seems to have simply assumed so without the literature motivating it), there's a "there" there. In other words either because of Vitamin D levels or for the same reasons as Vitamin D levels, there's an impact on your ability to survive the Wuhan Flu. Separate research is also looking into (in general, not for Vitamin D) a link between suspectibility to the virus and the likelihood of transmission: to wit, if you're more likely to die from it you're more likely to get and/or give it. This means that the death rate and the incidence rate aren't as linearly independent as you might expect. So what does this mean to niggers? Well it means that the "Vitamin D paradox" might not be a paradox, and that the claim that doctors are "overdiagnosing" Vitamin D deficiency in negroes may in fact be false, and they actually [B]do[/B] have lower levels. It might not align with their bone density (like the swimming joke I made earlier) but still exist, and show itself in the increased likelihood of getting and/or dying from COVID-19.

Seeing as how the only "discrimination" they find for niggers and Vitamin D is a claim that white doctors are "exaggerating" their low levels, maybe idiots from The Nation can shut up trying to blame the Wuhan Flu's tear through black communities as "racism".

Strangely enough, the link between Vitamin D and sodomy is much less documented...

PersecutedPatriot #conspiracy englisc-gateway.com

Political correctness in itself is a terminology designed for socialist control of the people and to enforce its corrupt values upon our society. How can it be politically correct for a nationalist and patriot who loves his Country to abide by the global intentions of socialist domination and a multicultural society where all ethnic values are destroyed and individual nations beaten into submission to accept that they are no longer part of a unique and proud culture but a ‘Citizen of the world’

In the last 300 years since the demise of the English parliament and rule enforced on us by the invasion of the Dutch and European mercenaries led by William of Orange. England has been without a voice and this is why Socialism was allowed to infiltrate so deeply into our cultural heritage and destroy us from within and the blame must lay with the British political system and our forced participation in the union that nobody really wanted. It is now time to rise up against the British political system and by doing so we can cast out socialism as well and restore our English heritage and cultural identity. Socialism must not be allowed to form an alliance with Islam or any other cult or foreign political ideology that is against English values and we need to spread the word and stay strong to our values. Once we show the people of England that there is hope and that by standing together we can defeat this political abomination that has partially destroyed our Ethnicity then only then can we regain control and cast it out once and for all. Keeping the faith and uniting together is the last hope for England for if we do not achieve this in the next two decades, then England will be no more and the likes of the Socialist led European Union and the satanic cult of Islam through its barbaric principals of Sharia law will ultimately control these once proud lands.

Blake Dont Crack #fundie medium.com

There’s a popular liberal myth that claims that individual cops can be good. This claim is rooted in white supremacist mythology that suggests racism is an individual act committed by anybody. First and foremost, policing is not a question of individualism. It is not as if a random individual gets a gun, a badge, a police car, and a blue uniform. The police are a highly organized institution with systemic power. In order to understand any institution, it is important you start with the history of that institution, the institution of modern day policing evolved from the slave patrol system.

Enslaved Black bodies were the foundation of the american economy, as enslaved Africans were more valuable than america’s industrial capital combined. Many Black people attempted and successfully ran away from slave masters, which made the white ruling class lose money. This led to the creation of the police. Their motto was to serve and protect, not citizens, but the institution of slavery. This fueled the american settler colonial empire, and subsequently boosted the capitalist economy.

While the role of police/policing during chattel slavery was to protect the “property” of white slave-owning land stealers, the system evolved. Shortly after the “abolishment” of chattel slavery, the 13th amendment institutionalized slavery through the federal government. The police transformed into the gatekeepers of the prison slavery industry. A system that enslaves Black men at a higher amount than chattel slavery, and advocates for the criminalization of Black women and girls. The more bodies in prison the more potential for exploited labor and disenfranchisement.

The police also serve as a neo-colonial paramilitary force that protects and promotes the white capitalists interests. A prime example of this neo-colonial force was at Standing Rock. The u.s. government authorized police to forcibly remove indigenous people from their land. All of this violence was done in the name of an oil pipeline that donald trump is invested in.

To suggest that there are good cops is like saying there’s good slave patrols or good colonizers. It acts as if policing is an individual act that isn’t a product of racial capitalism. A cop might have “good intentions”, but these good intentions don’t change the fact that they are a part of a system that is rooted in anti-Blackness. These “good intentions” don’t change the fact that the system they work for criminalizes the whole Black community. I am anti-police not just anti-police brutality. If you are only “anti-police brutality” you are simply saying that you think slave patrols are good just as long as the slave patrols doesn’t beat anybody.

The police must be abolished if police brutality is to end. There’s no such thing as reforming a system of policing that was founded on slave-catching. Every branch of the u.s government supports the institution of police which is why the entire system must be removed. Now, some might argue that abolishing the police will create more “crime”. The entire idea of crime is a racialized profit scheme (but that’s another article). I want you to imagine a world in which a $100 billion every year isn’t spent on the police. $100 billion dollars could fund the college education of every “american”.

$100 billion dollars could feed every person in this country. $100 billion dollars could make sure everyone has the right to clean water. $100 billion dollars could make sure that every person had adequate health care. We must abolish capitalism, as capitalism places human life in cell blocks and uses slave labor to expand the american colonial project.

DIONYSES #racist stormfront.org

My first rant.

I used to cite US foreign policy to blame for the amount of black immigrants in Italy at the moment, but the cinema and now its politics (Obama!?) also appears to have an effect and especially the obnoxious colonisation of the world media by Afro-American RAP.

It sometimes leads me to despair that we will drown in illegal immigration from Africa, South America and Asia. To walk around Milan you would be hard pressed to see a white person anywhere nowadays. And this is northern Italy, a previously Celtic region. The bus, tram and rail systems here are spewing to bursting point with them.

The worse thing about them is their arrogance. Black men automatically think that they indisputably desirable and that women are gullible garbage. I cant count the number of times that I am harassed in one day by black African men. And they do not go away.

There is no law here or anywhere however that will defend the rights of a uni educated white European women with 3000 years of classical history behind her, if she finds the attentions of an illiterate black native still fresh from rubbing camels feaces on his walls, vulgar and offensive and a total violation of her sensibilities. In fact, this is what appears to embellish the black ego. The potency of their ignorance and their potential to disgust, only the possibility that they inspire physical and mental revulsion is beyond their belief system: there is so much black culture on the media, and so many revolting white women (trash) who pander to their sleaze.

The joke is, how do you know a black man has just had sex. His eyes are red from the pepper spray. It is too true. And the threat is very real and no joke.

If booting out Hollywood means booting Hollywood Jews along with the Jiggy-Rap-$-harvesting black vulgarities they rode in, all well and good, and if that includes the gut churning perversion that is Madonna, even better - in fact I may write to Rome and insist on it. If there is one thing that Hollywood appears to approve of, that is black men and white women, Madonnna being the worst Italian traitor to classical culture that I can think of. She is the kind of Hollywood Jew that would kiss any colour of *ss if it meant making more $ for her. (what other type are there?)

Italian culture needs someone to stop it being seriously backended, de-evolved and colonised and wiped out for good. With Bossi in Parliament and what I hope to be a severe and growing discontent with the invasion of our lands and the dessimation of our white Celtic cutural heritage in the North, perhaps there is some hope, .....

Rabbi Moshe Averick #fundie algemeiner.com

Al Sharpton and the Lynching of George Zimmerman

As jury selection continues in the trial of George Zimmerman for what are obviously trumped up charges of second degree murder, let us focus on the malevolent undercurrents that are animating this drama. One might be tempted to call the entire affair a miscarriage of justice but in using that metaphor we would be guilty of understatement. More appropriate: A Kermit Gosnell style late-term murder/abortion of justice.

After the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman was released by the Sanford Police. Why? For the obvious reason that his claim of self-defense was perfectly reasonable and there was no probable cause to charge him with anything at all.

[...]

The lesson to be learned from Jim Crow and racial oppression is that justice is justice and truth is truth no matter what color the alleged victim or perpetrator. Many blacks and liberal whites who bend over backwards to show how “black” they are, seem to feel that the lesson learned is: It’s fine to lynch, as long as it’s a white man accused of shooting a black man.

George Zimmerman is being sacrificed on the altar of the liberal/progressive gospel. That gospel states that white racism is among the most powerful forces driving events in the United States of America. If there is excessive unemployment in the black community, the cause is always white racism. If black students are failing in school, the cause is always white racism. If a black man is killed by a white man or policeman, the cause is always white racism. If the black community is rife with drugs, prostitution, street gangs, out of wedlock children, and men who refuse to take responsibility for the women they impregnate and the children they sire, the cause is always white racism. Facts – for example: the one thing a young black man must actually fear more than anything else in this country is being murdered by another young black man – are irrelevant, as are reason and logic. The inherent irrationality within this gospel is evidenced by the accusation, that demanding proof of identity before voting is also motivated by white racism (is it racist to require an ID before boarding an airplane?).

David G. Brown #fundie returnofkings.com

Hillary Clinton Pulls Out The Lie Book To Try And Stump The Trump At The First Presidential Debate

Monday night’s first Presidential debate, held at Hofstra University in New York, lacked some of the rhetorical fireworks between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton that many had anticipated. Still, the performances of both candidates confirmed earlier assessments made by Return Of Kings. Republican nominee Trump highlighted how America is continuing to lose out economically, socially, and in terms of its national security to other states and organized groups, including ISIS. By contrast, Clinton deployed a series of diversions and straight-out lies to bait again those perennial victims brainwashed by Democrats over decades: millions of blacks, Hispanics, young people, and non-SJW women.

The First Presidential Debate: Hillary Clinton And Donald Trump (Full Debate) | NBC News

(starts at 26:00)

The problem with Clinton’s performance is that she relied on “zingers,” as the mainstream media calls them, which are considered factual and superb just because she says them. They are either inaccurate or, just as bad, banal platitudes about “justice,” “fairness,” and “equality.” These feel-good lines are devoid of either context or proof. Compare this to Trump, who zoomed in perfectly on the cancers afflicting the US: deference to rivals and enemies, failing to ask allies for proper support, and a basic refusal to act in the ways that are best for America.

Here are three key areas in which the Trump-Clinton divide was most prominent during last night’s debate:

Hillary can’t shake off her globalist past—and future

Trump astutely homed in on Hillary Clinton’s previous “gold standard” description of the toxic Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) “free trade” proposal, support which the Democratic nominee claimed to have backtracked on only months ago. He linked this praise to her fawning endorsement of NAFTA in the 1990s. NAFTA, as Trump pointed out, has led to the erosion of American manufacturing and the strange situation where Mexico is allowed to export its goods into America with much smaller financial barriers than the reverse. The TPP promises to do the same and, when it comes to US based-interests, will only benefit transnational corporations.

Clinton was unwilling to categorically rule out backing the TPP again if elected President and avoided criticizing Barack Obama for wanting it implemented. She also said nothing of substance in relation to combating China’s extremely anti-free trade behavior, most notably the constant devaluation of its currency. In the context of a $20 trillion US national debt and trade deficits that balloon ever more, the likely Democratic inaction on this front is alarming and only surrenders national, rather than corporate interests. What she did do was to try to placate those wanting a welfare state, promising things like “debt-free college” and a minimum wage rise. But how can those she will get the money from, “the wealthy,” pay for both these shopping items and simultaneously pay down the debt?

When the topic switched to terrorism, the Democratic nominee refrained from discussing how ISIS began its rise when she was Secretary of State, an inconvenient truth she was quickly reminded about. Expanding on this bad judgment point, Trump alluded to a related national security failure of the “experienced” Secretary Clinton: the United States’ persistent bankrolling of other states’ safety at the direct expense of its own. The whole point of NATO is that it is an alliance, but America always seems to foot the bill, just as it does in its relationship with Japan. In response, Hillary Clinton was unable—or simply refused—to articulate how this is either a desirable or affordable state of affairs. This is telling as nationalist vs. globalist arguments grow more salient within the current American political discourse.

Gender pay gap madness

Hillary Clinton unsurprisingly brought up the gender pay gap, a long-discredited myth that ignores how women, even those employed full-time, work on average less hours than men. This political fiction, one perpetually drawing in millions of self-victimized female voters and emasculated white knights, fails to acknowledge the greater presence of men in higher-skilled and therefore higher-paying industries as well.

Despite the certainty that this kind of argument would be raised, Clinton took it to a new, far more delusional level by suggesting that women deserve the same pay for inferior work. She claimed that Donald Trump “said women don’t deserve equal pay unless they do as good a job as men.” He actually did not say this, as a fact check used in a [i]USA Today[/i] article illustrated months ago.

Yet even if he had made the statement, this is perhaps the least controversial soundbite, real or imagined, that anyone has ever used to try and discredit Trump. The falsely attributed words are one hundred percent in line with the idea of “equal pay for equal work.” If your work is not of the same quality as your peer, you should not get equal pay. How, for example, is a junior female lawyer who brings in less clients and billable hours than her male counterpart deserving of equal pay? What Trump did say is that he favors paying employees based on performance.

Necessary corrections aside, Hillary Clinton’s line is merely a prelude to the affirmative action she will unleash upon the American economy if elected. Having already implied that women deserve equal pay even if their work and performance cannot be described as equal, expect concrete legislation that will force employers to hire women over men, irrespective of their credentials, socioeconomic backgrounds (preferential treatment allows many Middle American men to be leapfrogged by women from privileged families), and the real requirements of the job.

Race-baiting… again

Hillary Clinton reverted to re-peddling the tired old fantasy that 2016 is the new Jim Crow laws era. Forgetting that countless non-blacks are in jail for non-violent offences, too, she falsely portrayed African-Americans as the victims of police harassment and racist hysteria over crimes that are not murder, rape or serious assault. To boot, she pushed aside the higher involvement of blacks in violent felonies. Clinton further outlined how outright (white) racism, not certain cultural values and black-on-black brutality, purportedly explains almost every conceivable problem confronting African-Americans today. Plus, she did not ever call out the truly deplorable rioters in Charlotte, nor condemn overall the opportunistic troublemakers that comprise Black Lives Matter.

Trump absolutely schooled his opponent, however, when it came to the astounding rate of violence in Chicago, Clinton’s city of birth. In a metropolitan area where gun laws are amongst the most restrictive in the nation, black-on-black crime especially has decimated African-American communities. Clinton’s crude racial politics quickly became stuck and the candidate herself appeared to be flustered. After all, Chicago, which Trump was using as an example of the general malaise of crime found across the country, is controlled locally by Democrats, like most major cities.

The desperation of Hillary Clinton, a representative of a party which has failed America’s minorities and made them poorer, became evident when she mentioned a racial discrimination lawsuit, not a finding of guilt, brought against Trump forty years ago. With nothing to offer blacks and Hispanics, other than the same old dud policies on a national and municipal level, she had to invent a boogeyman to distract people.

But the media still lauded Clinton

Regardless of her cheap antics at the debate, almost every mainstream media editorial from CNN’s to the LA Times‘ waxed lyrical about Clinton’s supposedly epic performance on Monday night. That sycophancy will only grow from now until election day. But if takes so much concerted, stooge-like media support to help her win, what does that say about her as a candidate?

Right now, though, we should be both proud of and amazed at where Trump is at the moment. Only six months ago, people were bellowing that he would still lose the Republican nomination. He could never ever win, the experts said. Moreover, just a year ago, his candidacy was considered a laughing stock by elites and nearly all supporters of the Democrats.

So who’s laughing at Donald Trump now? Not many people, and certainly not a very concerned Hillary Clinton.

Subverted Nation #racist subvertednation.net

I’m not saying the entire KKK is jewish, because it’s not, but like all groups that stir up racism and cause division, it certainly has it’s share of them. Both in leadership, members, and provocateurs, there are always plenty of jews afoot. It just so turns out that the KKK got it’s name from the Greek word kyklos meaning circle, and jews got the name kike from the yiddish word kikel meaning circle as well.

Knowing jews are always found on both sides of the racism equation (i.e. KKK, Nazi Party, NAACP, ACLU, SPLC, ADL) it’s at the very least quite intriguing that these names have such similar origins. Another intriguing note is that jews often attach great significance to names, and are known to alter them like this to fit different purposes.

[...]

If all human non-jews are smart they will put the racial differences aside, and focus real racist hatred onto the jews stirring the pot. This doesn’t mean you can’t be a white nationalist, a black nationalist, or a person of any race who is proud of their skin color, heritage, culture, or whatever you may think defines you. I am not racist except against jews, and I implore others to look at it the same way.

The jews are the most racist people on the planet, and yet they use racism to divide the rest of us, so they may rape us at will. Naturally, we should all be racist against them, if for nothing else than rational self defense.

All that any of this is meant to identify is that white, black, and every other non-jewish race are stuck on a sinking raft together. We can either fight with each other as we ride our limp dingy down into the darkest depths of the sea, or we can recognize we are sinking because of the jew with the ice pick, poking all the holes in our floaty. If we’re smart, we can work together to throw their asses overboard, and finally get on with patching the raft, before we never see dry land again.

David Bay #fundie cuttingedge.org

Most of us think of the Smurfs as cute, harmless little blue and white aliens. However, the story line is full of occultism. Papa Smurf is cast in the role of a "White" Witchdoctor who is protecting his people by incantations and rituals and potions. Gargamel is cast in the role of the "Black" or evil witchdoctor who is always trying to cast some evil spell over the poor, helpless Smurfs so he can control them forever. In one cartoon screen several years ago, Gargamel is shown creating a Devil's Pentagram from lighted candles on the dirt floor of his house. Gargamel moved inside the Pentagram and carried out a ritual designed to defeat Papa Smurf and the little Smurfs. Your children have probably watched this most Satanic cartoon.

Students United Ithacia #racist dangerous.com

High School Play Canceled Following Student Outrage Against White Actress Cast for Lead Role

A New York high school won’t be hosting “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” after outrage that the lead role went to a white student.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEEpavnk7Uw

Ithaca High School found itself shunned by social justice after the role of Esmeralda went to a white student and caused a black student to quit.

“It shows you that theater wasn’t made for you,” the disgruntled actress told the Ithaca Journal. “And it shows you that, if you can’t get the parts that are written for you, what parts are you going to get?”

The protests began and “Students United Ithaca” wrote a letter.

The students indulged the idea that the girl cast as Esmeralda may be “a stellar actor, singer, and dancer” and any production would be “lucky to have” her. However they decided her complexion should disqualify her because she is an “epitome of whiteness.”

“At best, this is cultural appropriation,” the high school students wrote, accusing the Performing Arts Program at IHS of racial bias, and “at worst, it is whitewashing, a racist casting practice which has its roots in minstrelsy.”

Victor Hugo wrote “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” in 1831 where he describes Esmeralda as half Roma, half French. The Roma (sometimes known as Romani or Gypsies) are mostly from Europe and run the gamete of skin tones, but the children insisted only “brown and black female students” should be allowed for the part. They say in the letter:

“Esmeralda is a Roma, part of an oppressed class of people. It is her oppression, and that of her people, which allows her to better understand the perspective of the Hunchback and to ultimately advocate for him.”

Musical Theater International production guide describes the fictitious character as “an outcast racially and culturally,” which is the idea that the student protesters misinterpreted to mean “black” or “brown.”

The school district pacified the angry children in an effort to be “more inclusive and culturally responsive” and “efforts to eliminate institutional biases.” The high school drama lead to IHS planning on organizing “another collaborative project” in hopes no one will be offended once again.

It didn’t end there.

The budding social justice warriors decided to post a list of additional demands to Facebook.

In one of the demands, the students asked to “STOP the racist and openly stated policy of ‘color blind’ casting in the ICSD.” Most of the demands are some variation of “hire more people of color” worded differently several times.

The list for Ithaca High doesn’t leave out the white students, however, gifting their white peers an opportunity to learn new things with a policy of “STOP ignoring and denying that you have created a white centered program run by white adults for the benefit of white children. White children should also be educated about interrupting these practices of White supremacy.”

The self proclaimed junior “social justice activists” explained to Fox News how their “endgame” is all about what’s best for everyone else. From the mouths of babes, they simply desire “…a performing arts program with more unity, more inclusion, and musical where we can all experience the joy and bonding of inclusive performing arts following best theatrical practices.”

The Performing Arts Department in Ithaca will be scrambling to rediscover “the joy and bonding of inclusive performing” or else these kids will have to make more Facebook posts.

According to recent census data, Ithica is 73.97 per cent white and 6.71 per cent black.

river #fundie proudly-pro-choice.tumblr.com

[ Is it acceptable that, I as a black woman am allowed to be afraid of white people because my white ex boyfriend abused me sexually, physically and mentally? ]

abuse mention tw, sexual abuse mention tw,
Most definitely and absolutely.
So, I always look at it this way:
Marginalized people (which you as a black woman most definitely are) have every single right to be afraid of/hate etc. their oppressors. Both because let’s be honest, it’s not like the oppressing groups are known for treating marginalized people well, but also because of power imbalances.
When a black trans woman (not saying that you are, just to make an example) is afraid of a white cis dude, her fear is not unfounded, because even if he’s the nicest person in the world, he has the power to do to her whatever he likes, and the law, and society will more than likely be on his side.
When a white cis dude is scared of a black woman, the power imbalance works for him, not against. Even if the white cis dude in question has a bad history, at the end of the day he’s safe. Being white, he’s in the position of power, being a man, his power is increased. His fear is based off (maybe) personal experience, racism, and misogyny. The black woman’s fear is based off a shitty society full of misogyny and racism, and a need for safety.
To look at things in another light:
When a white person is afraid of a poc, they are perpetuating those stereotypes, which lead to violence against poc, and general discrimination against poc. When poc are afraid of white people, there are no negative repercussions for said white people. White people aren’t loosing jobs because they’re viewed as “violent”. White people are being stopped by cops, because it’s just assumed that they’re selling drugs. White people aren’t being required to prove that they’re legal citizens because they don’t “look american.” In this way, poc disliking/fearing etc. white people, is not, and can not be the same. This is also why “reverse racism” isn’t a thing. This logic is also true for woman, trans people, and so on.
Poc have every right to be afraid, uncomfortable around, dislike, etc. white people (even if there’s no abuse history present, although that only makes it more understandable). To go even further, if poc decide they don’t want any white friends, or people to be involved in their personal life, cool. There’s nothing wrong with that. (In the same vein, if trans people decide they only want trans people in their life, there’s nothing wrong with that. If disabled people decide they only want disabled people in their life, there’s nothing wrong with that, and so on.)
You don’t owe anyone anything. You don’t need to like white people, you don’t need to want to be around white people, and that doesn’t make you a bad person. The most important thing is your comfort, safety, and well being.
Also, I hope you’re okay now! If you ever need to talk, I’m here! And please know that your experiences are completely valid, and that your emotions/feelings on the matter, and what you’ve been through are also completely and entirely valid. I know there’s a lot of “love your oppressor or you’re just as bad uwu” stuff out there, but please know that that is not true. That message is honestly so toxic, and I really hate how common it is.
I don’t know if this is something you’re looking for more information on, and you may already follow them, but I’ve heard really good things about the blog ablackwomansurvivingrape-I don’t follow it since I’m neither black, nor a woman, but I’ve heard good things about it as a blog, so you may want to check them out, if you’re ever looking for specific resources in regards to healing from the things you’ve been through.
Survivor-surviving is another really good one, that handles abuse in general (although it isn’t gender or race specific) and has a ton of useful information.
I hope this finds you well, and that you’re okay!

[ Im the anon who has a friend who fears black girls because of prior abuse/bullying. I dont think she is a bad person at all. She is just damaged and scared. She doesn 't really hate black girls. She just scared of them because she had nothing but bad expieriences with them. She has a hard time trusting people and making friends because bullies spread horrible rumours about her. She is a very nice person.. ]


racism tw, anti-black racism tw, abuse mention tw, bullying mention tw

Alright, so I’m just going to be honest with you.
If you’re mean to/mistrusting/mistreating/afraid of/exotificing/simplifying etc. a marginalized group of people (especially black women, and black trans women) you are not a good person. This is racism at minimum, and it’s a problem.
Based off the way this ask is phrased I’m assuming you are not in fact a black girl. So your friend is probably super cool to you. But is she super cool to her black woman doctor? To her black lady barista? To the black girl that asks to sit next to her on the bus? Because I suspect they might have a different answer then you.
And frankly, being abused, and being bullied is not an excuse. It’s awful that she was bullied-I’m not denying that. Bullying is horrific, and it has lasting effects and I’m sorry she went through with that. However, that is no excuse for racism. That does not make racism, or this kind of treatment of black women okay. And trying to justify it as such is super gross.

Dr. Gary Cass #fundie christiannewswire.com

In a short video posted on FunnyorDie.com entitled, "Prop 8 The Musical," an all star cast of Hollywood celebrities perform a low budget musical farce that defames Christ, mocks Christians and distorts the teaching of the Bible.

"Jack Black should remember from his days at Hebrew School that homosexual acts aren't funny and are roundly condemned in the Bible," said Dr. Gary Cass, of the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission. "Appearing as a sarcastic, rotund Christ, Black distorts the Bible and condones shameful, homosexual acts. Associating Christ with perverse activity is an affront to all people of faith, especially Christians. Apparently Black and company find it hilarious to falsely accuse Christians while they intentionally distort the Bible. Black ought to apologize."

Anonymous Coward #racist godlikeproductions.com

If the Nazi brand of national socialism won ww2:


1 - Liberalism & multiculturalism wouldn't dominate Western ethos
(both are Jewish creations and both have always been heavily
promoted/advanced by Jews; thus if no Jewish influence, then no
liberalism and no multiculturalism... at least certainly nowhere near
the degree we see today)


2 - No cold war (because there would be no USSR)


3 - No Communist Eastern Europe/Iron Curtain (when WWII ended, Eastern
Europe fell to Communism - this was part of Stalin's spoils of war)

4 - No Red China and Mao's subsequent killing of 40 - 60 million Chinese
(the USSR created favorable conditions for Mao's Communists which
ultimately led to Mao's victory over Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalists in
1949, thus if no USSR, no Mao victory)

5 - No Communist North Vietnam (both the Soviet Union and Red China aided Ho Chi Minh)


6 - No Communist Cambodia and Pol Pot's slaughter of 2 million Cambodians (Red China aided Pol Pot)


7 - No dividing Korea into North Korea & South Korea (the Allies
split Korea after WWII ended, with North Korea becoming Communist...
another of Stalin's spoils of war)


8 - No Communist Cuba (given the previous, what support would Castro have had in the 1950's?)


9 - No Communism anywhere (Hitler was the world's most fervent anti-Communist)


10 - No USSR (the Soviet government murdered millions of its own people
during its 70 year reign - to study this topic read the writings of
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn; Hitler would have liberated the USSR, though
taking large parts of its Western region for lebensraum, "living space")

11 - No Cultural Marxism and no political correctness (these are social
engineering "tools" which came out of the Jewish think tank known as the
Frankfurt School)

12 - No third world immigration into Western nations (Jews wouldn't be
in power positions to craft and force through liberal immigration laws;
Jews are responsible for each and every Western nation's liberal
immigration policy/laws, as all were orchestrated by a consortium
consisting of the World Jewish Congress, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid
Society, and B'nai B'rith)

13 - No depraved filth on TV, in movies, etc. (because Jews wouldn't run Hollywood)

14 - No widespread pornography (Jewish lawyers and Jewish activists were
the main challengers of anti-obscenity laws, under the guise of
"Freedom of Speech")

15 - There would still be prayer in public schools (Jewish lawyers were
instrumental in banning prayer in public schools under the guise of
so-called "separation of church and state," something that appears
nowhere in the U.S. Constitution)

16 - No man-hating radical feminist movement (Jews such as Betty
Friedan, Sonia Pressman, and Gloria Steinem, among others, were the key
drivers of radical feminism)

17 - No Israel and all the problems it has brought the USA and the immeasurable misery it has wrought on the Palestinians

18 - Jews would be living in Madagascar (perhaps) and would be carefully
monitored (Madagascar was one place Hitler considered as a Jewish
homeland)
image

John Q. Publius #sexist #racist #dunning-kruger identitydixie.com

[From "Toxic Avengers: The Return of Aspirational Masculinity"]

Following the de-platforming of Republic Standard by the host, I’ve decided to re-post some of my favorites from my time there for your reading pleasure. Enjoy!

[...]

Did anyone expect, when we were hurtling toward Y2K and the late Senator Ted Stevens’s pneumatic tube-powered Information Super Highway that we would be discussing “trans women’s periods”? Instead of colonizing Mars? As the Soviet general in The Camp of the Saints lamented between sips of vodka: “We’re caught in the clutches of the great hermaphrodite, Zackaroff. We’re all its serfs. And we can’t even cut off its balls!” Yes, the neo-liberal project has given our civilization opioids and anti-depressants and a steady diet of appointments with the local psychoanalyst; it’s blessed us with hormone blockers for prepubescent children and demon-drag-queen story time and soon IUDs for first-graders. Lothrop Stoddard’s Revolt Against Civilization is in full swing:

Congenitally incapable of adjusting themselves to an advanced social order, the degenerate inevitably become its enemies—particularly those “high-grade defectives” who are the natural fomenters of social unrest. Of course, the environmentalist argues that social unrest is due to bad social conditions, but when we go into the matter more deeply we find that bad conditions are largely due to bad people. The mere presence of hordes of low-grade men and women condemned by their very natures to incompetency and failure automatically engender poverty, invite exploitation, and drag down others just above them in the social scale.

Such inequities can only be compounded by the ever-growing throngs of the maladjusted and violent who are mostly unable and/or unwilling to adapt to or maintain the rigors of success in the West. The victim mentality creates a power vacuum that will inevitably be filled by a more self-assured group or groups; thus assuring our conquest, the West will have been reduced to nothing but a bunch of genderless, species-less trans-abled amorphous blobs incapable of lifting a finger in self-defense. Otherwise, and perhaps a more likely outcome, in these conditions of fractured tribalism the country will “require” the installation of a ruthlessly totalitarian government headed and staffed, of course, by the managerial “elites”—and for the few hold-outs, as Frank Carter sang on Gallows’s “The Vulture”: “If the horses won’t drink, drown them in the water.”

This idea that it’s all men, or that it’s “toxic masculinity” that is the root cause of violence in our society is preposterous. It’s pretty simple, really—the Left finds itself unable to perform even a rudimentary analysis of the perpetrators of violence. Part of it is that modernity is making people crazy, but biological sub-groups (ie-races) differ dramatically in violent and anti-social behavior. The black share of homicides nationally has actually increased while their population share remains relatively static, and of course the vast majority of those homicides are committed by black males. This simple instance of a legitimate “toxic masculinity” is not a possible explanation, however, “because racism.” Therefore, the Left twists itself in ever-more absurd contortions to explain really rather simple explanations (another example is the “gender pay gap”).

We know that, on average, black children hit puberty first and Asian children last, which may have something to do with the advanced physical development of many blacks, which is particularly pronounced in the teen years relative to, say, whites or Asians. The ramifications in terms of brain development and verbal acuity and spatial reasoning remain somewhat less known, but we can draw inferences based on the available science. Ignoring fundamental differences between people, not to mention the wealth of quantifiable data that show strong correlations between specific behaviors and outcomes, is not going to lessen our problems. It’s going to make them worse—as we’re witnessing.

These “debates” are absolutely drenched in Leftist moralism, to the point where even pointing out well-established science is cause for professional and social termination. Rather than bending over backwards to find “hate crimes” and “systemic racism” to explain away black underachievement, would not a consideration of cognitive differences liberate the whole nation from this ceaseless pearl-clutching? There is no white conspiracy to marginalize blacks (at least none that I’m aware of), but there are evolved differences in intelligence that exacerbate group differences in an increasingly cognitively-intensive economy. These difference are no one’s fault but Mother Nature’s, unless of course the actual mother made poor in utero or child-rearing decisions (for example, black mothers are thirty times more likely than white mothers to give birth to a child with fetal alcohol syndrome, and are much more likely to use corporal punishment on their children, which is proven to affect cognitive development). Nevertheless, Leftist dogma renders an honest discussion impossible.

Haiti has been an independent country longer than Canada, New Zealand, Australia, or Ireland—all four were products of colonialism—and they have turned out just a little different I would say. The United States has only been independent a couple of decades longer than Haiti. Do you want to keep on blaming colonialism? How about Ethiopia, which minus five years has been an independent nation for millennia? We have been conditioned to accept equality of outcome when the biological inputs are so wildly divergent. This is patently absurd. As all populations increasingly have access to the same technologies, amenities, and advancements as everyone else, and the global economy becomes more cognitively-intensive, with an honest appraisal we can only expect the disparity in outcome between humanity’s haves and have-nots to widen ever-further without a full-bodied globalist tyranny.

Likewise, in the interests of furthering what’s mutated into the paradox that is modern feminism’s prudish Epicureanism—indeed in erasing the distinctions between man and woman by un-coupling gender from sex, which sort of defeats the purpose of feminism—the most appalling manifestations of totalitarianism are necessary to force the supremely unnatural, in the process destroying both masculinity and femininity by turning each sex into a shitty facsimile of the other and never the twain shall meet. Or is it the opposite, a melding of pregnant men and women soldiers into the Androgynes of the Future?

[...]

Women like sociologist Lisa Wade are too preoccupied with President Trump’s “carpe pussy” comments from over a decade ago to understand that the immigration restrictions/overhaul the majority of Americans support would stop immigrants and “refugees” from intractably misogynistic cultures from coming here and bringing their regressive attitudes toward women as chattel, barbaric practices such as female genital mutilation and honor killings, and a lack of restraint from sexually assaulting women either through non-existent impulse control or cultural entitlement.

[...]

To expand on the red pill metaphor, it is not just an awakening from The Matrix, but that red evokes the notion of consanguinity, or shared blood, the bonds of which, indeed, are thicker than water (typically colored or referred to as blue). The “red,” our republic’s life-blood, cannot survive without its people. The ultimate demise of the founding Roman noble families roughly corresponds to the time Caracalla extended full citizenship rights to the entire empire. “Democracy in action,” we might say, but without an aspirational core of true Roman families on which the empire could rest, the decline was not long after, for what is a Rome without Romans? Further, in the absence of expansion, the momentum of the empire ground to a halt, and its focus turned inward, both in conflict and in navel-gazing hedonism. This is not to suggest that the key to reviving the American nation is through resuscitating “54 40 or Fight,” but that after planting our flag on the moon we wasted trillions of dollars and decades of energy on “equality” and dragged (or in the case of Afghanistan and the Middle East are dragging) our military through morass after morass instead of securing the border and re-directing our eyes back to the heavens. This aspirational masculinity is at the heart of Western civilization and it drives our conquering spirit both literally and metaphorically. It is time we stopped cowering before inferior cultures and entitled parasites and re-assert what makes us the most spectacular civilization in human history. “Man up,” indeed: there is a very powerful message here, one which we would be wise to heed.

Eri #racist thisisnotjapan.tumblr.com

[To the comment, "Yeah, sorry, but racism is not a white invention. Racism is rampant in all non-white parts of the world."]

1. White supremacy is a white invention

2. anti blackness is a white invention

3. white people colonized almost the entire fucking world and spread their system and their cultures everywhere, including racism

4. What racism is known as in many parts of the world was directly invented and carried out by white people, white supremacy is a global phenomenon

5. the way that race is popularly defined was also created by white people to promote white supremacy

Jeannie DeAngelis #fundie americanthinker.com

As far as the Trayvon Martin situation goes, acquittal or no acquittal, the whole event and subsequent trial is a tragedy. And Skittles and iced tea or not, 17-year-old Trayvon should never have been lurking about in a hoodie between buildings on a dark rainy night in a townhouse complex. Now, regardless of how or why this boy died, a child is dead and will never have an opportunity to grow out of the typical youthful foolishness which ultimately cost him his life.
And for every hoodie-wearing thug out there who's now blaming George Zimmerman for Trayvon's death, know this: the behavior of those who give good, upstanding young black men a bad name are ultimately much more responsible for Trayvon's death than one legally-armed American citizen defending himself against an out-of-control teenage boy slamming his "crazy ass cracka" head against a concrete walk.

Instead of blaming racism for profiling a black kid strangely meandering around in the dark on a drizzly night, how about placing the blame at the feet of all the black youth, like Trayvon, whose behavior on other occasions causes suspicion to be focused in the general direction of the larger population of perfectly innocent black teenage youth?
For example, has Michelle Obama discussed who killed 15-year-old Chicago schoolgirl Hadiya Pendleton in a drive-by shooting? Of course not, because the killers were two black youths: 18-year-old Michael Ward and 20-year-old Kenneth Williams, neither of whom look anything like George Zimmerman.

FBI records show that in 2005 alone, African Americans accounted for 49% of all homicide victims in the U.S. The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics cited data showing that 93% of murdered blacks had the crime perpetrated on them by other blacks. That means if Trayvon had continued on in the direction in which he seemed to be headed, based on the rate that young black males die at the hands of other black males, Trayvon's chances for survival were, at best, a crap shoot.

Then, the day after George Zimmerman was acquitted of second-degree murder, the President of the United States chose to stir the race-baiting pot again by intimating that America should honor Trayvon by passing gun control:

"I now ask every American to respect the call for calm reflection from two parents who lost their young son. And as we do, we should ask ourselves if we're doing all we can to widen the circle of compassion and understanding in our own communities."

Barack Obama isn't one to hide his disrespect for federalism or conceal his contempt for the legal system or the U.S. Constitution. The statement Obama made reveals that his motivation was to once again gain personal political expediency from someone else's heartbreak.

Think about it: the president sheds tears over murdered children, but it's always attached to advancing a specific political agenda. That's precisely why, in some circles, as America's most radical pro-abortion advocate, Barack Obama has zero credibility when discussing lives lost to gun violence.

As far as Obama is concerned, Trayvon Martin deserves kudos for delivering a big bang for his anti-Second Amendment buck. Nonetheless, if the Trayvon controversy should miraculously cool down, in due time someone else will come along and provide still more political capital for the president.

Rest assured, if need be, Mr. Obama will move on quickly from Trayvon, just as he moved from Tucson to Sandy Hook to any number of other tragedies he's used as political causes.

Unfortunately, based on what went on in Sanford, Florida, certain African Americans fall into the same category as the president they blindly support.

Black Americans hung up on fomenting racial unrest or buying into the victim mentality lack credibility too, because although they cry racism over the tragic loss of Trayvon Martin, who they call one of their 'babies,' they have shed few tears over the extermination of actual babies taking place for the last 40 years in abortion clinics all over America.

While focused on Trayvon Martin, socially liberal black Americans continue to ignore the genocide that kills thousands of black baby boys (and girls) every day, many of whom, if given the chance to live, much like Trayvon Martin might have grown up to look like the son Barack Obama never had.

Does it matter that blacks constitute only 13% of the population but account for 36% of all the abortions that take place every year? Where are the tears, protest signs, and New Black Panther demonstrations for the deaths of innocent children who didn't break anyone's nose or smash anyone's skull against a sidewalk?

For perspective, 13% of the U.S. population contributed 22,000,000 of the 60,000,000 children aborted since 1973. Each and every day in the U.S., approximately 1,876 black children are aborted. And yet pro-life people are supposed to believe that the angst over Trayvon's untimely end is based on the black community's respect for the sanctity of life?

In her fight to save the unborn, Erma Clardy Craven, the late Minnesota social worker and author of Abortion, Poverty and Black Genocide, once shared that, "17,000 aborted babies were found in a dumpster outside a pathology laboratory in Los, Angeles, California; some 12-15,000 were observed to be black." Does the president care about them? Apparently not.

While Obama is asking America to "honor Trayvon" by doing what Obama wants, we forget that none of the 15,000 black babies found rotting in that dumpster in LA got the chance to wear a hoodie, shop for Skittles and fruit-flavored iced tea, or skulk around in the dark in a Sanford, Florida residential complex.

Suffice it to say, if only liberal blacks would spend just one day shouting as loudly about the systematic slaughter being perpetrated upon millions of their babies, the angry "Justice 4 Trayvon" stance would likely be better understood by those who disagree with their choice of poster child for racial injustice.


James L. Miller, Ph.D #racist immigration-globalization.blogspot.hu

If Hitler Won World War II We'd Have A Better, More Just World Today

[...]

Alternatively, if Hitler had won World War II and then exercised a Nationalist 'Sphere of Influence' over the greater Western World, we'd have a more just, fair, and moral Western World today. The rest of the world would have similarly benefited had the Germans been victorious since German influence would have surely spread elsewhere (ideas such as non-usurious banking and strong family oriented culture would likely have spread globally).

Had Hitler won World War II, what would be different in the post war world? Here are a few examples:

1 - No USSR (the Soviet government murdered millions of its own people during its 70 year reign - to study this topic read the writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn; Hitler would have liberated the USSR, though taking large parts of its Western region for lebensraum, "living space")

2 - No cold war (because there would be no USSR)

3 - No Communist Eastern Europe/Iron Curtain (when WWII ended, Eastern Europe fell to Communism - this was part of Stalin's spoils of war)

4 - No Red China and Mao's subsequent killing of 40 - 60 million Chinese (the USSR created favorable conditions for Mao's Communists which ultimately led to Mao's victory over Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalists in 1949, thus if no USSR, no Mao victory)

5 - No Communist North Vietnam (both the Soviet Union and Red China aided Ho Chi Minh)

6 - No Communist Cambodia and Pol Pot's slaughter of 2 million Cambodians (Red China aided Pol Pot)

7 - No dividing Korea into North Korea & South Korea (the Allies split Korea after WWII ended, with North Korea becoming Communist... another of Stalin's spoils of war)

8 - No Communist Cuba (given the previous, what support would Castro have had in the 1950's?)

9 - No Communism anywhere (Hitler was the world's most fervent anti-Communist)

10 - Liberalism & multiculturalism wouldn't dominate Western ethos (both are Jewish creations and both have always been heavily promoted/advanced by Jews; thus if no Jewish influence, then no liberalism and no multiculturalism... at least certainly nowhere near the degree we see today)

11 - No Cultural Marxism and no political correctness (these are social engineering "tools" which came out of the Jewish think tank known as the Frankfurt School)

12 - No third world immigration into Western nations (Jews wouldn't be in power positions to craft and force through liberal immigration laws; Jews are responsible for each and every Western nation's liberal immigration policy/laws, as all were orchestrated by a consortium consisting of the World Jewish Congress, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, and B'nai B'rith)

13 - No depraved filth on TV, in movies, etc. (because Jews wouldn't run Hollywood)

14 - No widespread pornography (Jewish lawyers and Jewish activists were the main challengers of anti-obscenity laws, under the guise of "Freedom of Speech")

15 - There would still be prayer in public schools (Jewish lawyers were instrumental in banning prayer in public schools under the guise of so-called "separation of church and state," something that appears nowhere in the U.S. Constitution)

16 - No man-hating radical feminist movement (Jews such as Betty Friedan, Sonia Pressman, and Gloria Steinem, among others, were the key drivers of radical feminism)

17 - No Israel and all the problems it has brought the USA and the immeasurable misery it has wrought on the Palestinians

18 - Jews would be living in Madagascar (perhaps) and would be carefully monitored (Madagascar was one place Hitler considered as a Jewish homeland)

Hugo #racist realjewnews.com

Christian Zionism is the mother of all spiritual deceptions and is a good indicator of how far Christian theology has been infiltrated.

Result = the message of Christ is neutralized and the perpetrators of evil are shielded by churches whilst the victims lay abandoned.

Are CZ aware of the vile comments made in the Talmud about Jesus and his mother? Are they aware that Muslims and the Koran by contrast talk about Jesus and his mother in reverent and respectful terms?

Are CZ aware of the overwhelming role of international Jewry in most movements/structures that have wrought destruction on mankind and the Christian social order e.g. Bolshevism, the Neocon, Hollywood, the swindler monetary system, Frankfurt School cultural Marxism and its offshoots, the matrix of lies known as mainstream media etc.?

The Scriptures say clearly that the whole world is deceived. Have CZ ever considered the possibility that they are laboring under a colossal deception?

All CZ can do is adopt these super-spiritual airs in which they quote Scripture — often out of context and without realizing that there are an equal number of Scriptures contradicting their biblical interpretation (not to mention common sense).

Brian Wiggins #racist eurocanadian.ca

Canadians from the founding cultures, need to look beyond a conventional political solution. If Catalonia, Khalistan, Israel, Wakanda, “Farrakhanland,” Scotland, Kurdistan, Quebec, and “New” California, why not a homeland for European-Canadians in South-Western Ontario; the Maritimes; the Prairies, around Quebec City or the interior of beautiful British Columbia? It’s British Columbia, after-all.

We can’t be accused of discriminating against people we don’t live with. The massive transfer of wealth and the $35B-$40B fiscal costs of immigration will disappear. Infrastructure savings would be enormous. We’ll never have to worry about being branded racists or xenophobes again. Taxes will decline. Hospitals, currently operating at 135% of capacity in both the Fraser River Valley and the GTA, largely as a result of chain migration, will gradually decline to their intended 85% cap, and we’ll be able to move on our highways again. The Canadian environmental could heal. Employment equity plans will vanish, and organizations can get thousands of our kids out of their parent’s basements and into the workforce.

A new homeland for the founding cultures might seem fantastic or a pipe dream to some but consider that we are now, as of the credit crisis of 2008-09, at a significant historical inflection point. In their bestselling book, The Fourth Turning: What the Cycles of History Tell Us About America’s Next Rendezvous with History, authors William Strauss and Neil Howe describe the seasonal nature of history and foresee an inevitable period of decay that will destroy existing social and political institutions.

Steven K. Bannon, former advisor to President Donald Trump (and many others), agrees that a Fourth Turning began in 2008 with the global financial credit crisis and has argued that the administrative state must be dismantled in advance of the final climax. Canadians, too, should tear down everything that is no longer functional, including our pathological immigration policies and official multiculturalism. In order to renew, forests need fires and rivers need floods.

To be fair, sweeping theories of history are not as well received in academia. The Fourth Turning is non-falsifiable and has been a tough sell to professional historians who have now been co-opted into re-writing and revising history to allow for the occupation of formerly Western ancestral homelands by alien out-groups. William McLoughlin, a former history prof at Brown, believes that it is fantasy to think that “if you put enough data together and have enough charts and graphs, you’ve made history into a science.” Fair enough. Those sophisticated enough to lose money in the capital markets at any time, will confirm that the future is unknowable by definition. Nevertheless, the Turnings are much more than mere happenstance or data mining.

Readers who have stock market experience can find support in Elliot’s 5th and final wave of his grand super-cycle and with Nikolai Kondratieff’s wave theory. The cycle of crises also corresponds with cycles of war identified by Arnold Toynbee and geopolitical cycles identified by William R. Thompson. Keep in mind Vladimir Lenin’s comment that “In some decades, nothing happens; in some weeks, decades happen.”

There’s a lot to be concerned about. North Korea and Iran; the staggering mountain of immoral public debt in the United States and Canada and throughout the West; the crouching, racist and hyper-nationalist tiger dreaming of global domination and increasingly militarizing, with weapons stolen from the West, the South China Sea, or what I prefer to call the North Philippine Sea, are all potential sparks. The world’s greatest threat according to Bill Gates, is an influenza pandemic. The Institute of Disease Modelling predicts that a severe flu pandemic could kill more than 33 million people in just 250 days. Several concerning strains are already circulating.[iv]

Finally, in my view, there is a growing threat of a second civil war exploding out of the incredible divisiveness in the United States. Either of these four “sparks;” debt, China, a flu pandemic, or the outbreak of a second American Civil War or a combination of these threats could ignite the final Fourth Turning “climax” sometime between now and 2025, give or take, according to the theory.

The generational cycle cannot explain the role or timing of these individual threats. Nor can it account for the great events of history, like the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the bombing of Pearl Harbor, President Kennedy’s assassination, 9/11 or the Lehman insolvency. What the generational cycle can do, according to Strauss and Howe, is explain how society is likely to respond to these events in different eras. It is the response, not the initial event, which defines an era according to the theory. [v] According to Strauss and Howe, the crisis period lasts for approximately 20 years.

A financial collapse driven by a debt implosion is certainly plausible. Total debt in the U.S., for example, including Federal, State, Municipal and contingent liabilities in Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare is roughly $207 Trillion. In Canada, the Province of Ontario is a financial train wreck. The province will need to increase borrowing to finance another spending shortfall, adding to an existing mountain of debt, borrowed on our grandchildren’s credit cards, and is forecast to rise to $325 Billion, or more than $22,500 for every man, woman and child in the Province.[vi]

Newly elected Premier, Doug Ford, will find his hands to be tied but at least he has the right mindset and there is some hope that his populist surge will spill over Federally next year. To make matters worse, Moody’s has joined the Bank for International Settlement (BIS) and S&P Global is warning that Canada’s banking system, yes Canada’s, is facing a growing threat of souring consumer loans amid rising interest rates. Canada’s ratio of household debt to disposable income reached a new astonishing record of 171% in the 3rd Q of 2017 and the proportion of uninsured mortgages has increased to 60% from 50% five years ago.[vii]

It is my view, however, that the final spark for the Fourth Turning will be ignited by a Second American Civil War. Either way, the day of reckoning is coming. The chickens will come home to roost.

The Fourth Turning, whatever the final cause(s), has the potential to trigger a political upheaval beyond what we can possibly ever imagine. Strauss and Howe see a return to a more traditional and conservative social order as one of the outcomes. If history is a guide, the probability of retribution for former “collaborators” and for those who resist the new expectations for conformity will be high. There will be no assumption of compassion for the traitors and complacency will not be an option.

On the bright side, fertility rates will rise again, quality of life and prosperity will climb and public investment in infrastructure will surge. We will enter into a period of Peace, Order and Good Government but many nations are likely to be fractured and geographically divided by ethnicity as a consequence.

Yes, there is hope for a new homeland for the founding cultures. This may be our opportunity to take our nation back and hold those responsible for giving it away, without our consent, as traitors. Gird your loins for our next rendezvous with destiny.

Canada is over 400 years old. Our people have a DNA all our own. We belong to a unique and storied nation with its own official languages, religion, history, heroes, mannerisms, culture and identity. We don’t want open borders. We don’t want mass migrations to change Canada into something new. We don’t want to become a minority in our own land. We want our country back.

Canadian “elites” babble about “diversity,” about how much better a country we will be in 2036 when white Europeans are just another minority and we have become a “gorgeous mosaic” of every race, tribe, creed and culture on earth. To many Canadians, such a future entails the death of our nation. To Canadians, millions of African, Chinese, Indian, Arab and Islamic peoples settling in our lands means the annihilation of the historic nation we love, the nation that came into being to preserve us. We will never forgive politicians, whether by accident, or design, if they change our country completely and forever.

Many of these aliens who occupy Canada today have no “cosanguity” with either of the two founding cultures or the larger white European family. From the growing expressions of resentment, contempt and even hostility towards us, it’s clear they we’re not compatible.[viii] Canada is increasingly being filled with people who have absolutely no connection to the great historic Dominion of Canada. They can’t be faulted. Canada was never really created for them but as anti-white sentiment goes mainstream and all of Canada’s non-whites increasingly assert their own racial and ethnic heritage, what will keep Canada together when we lose our white majority? If Euro-Canadians had the same group loyalty as Sikhs, Muslims, Chinese and Indians we would never have permitted these aliens into our land to begin with.

Our ancestors did not create the heroic and adventurous Hudson Bay Company, fight on the Plains of Abraham, Beaver Dam, Stoney Creek, Lundy’s Lane, Michilimackinac Island, Queenston Heights, Paardeberg and Leliefontein, Ypres, Vimy Ridge, Passchendaele, The North Atlantic, in Defence of Hong Kong, The Battle of Britain, Dieppe, D-Day, The Liri Valley, Normandy, the Scheldt, Kapyong and Kandahar, and endure the enormous hardships and sacrifice of the Great Depression, in order for baby boomers to turn the country over to alien out-groups and foreigners who have nothing in common with us and who don’t share our values.

Canada is much more than an idea; it’s much more than a shopping mall. The Fathers of Confederation did not frame the British North America Act to celebrate diversity. It’s the “British” North America Act, after all. Canadians did not spill their blood and treasure around the world for multiculturalism and to become a marginalized, despised but “privileged” minority in the land bequeathed to us by their ancestors; our home and native land. Did we?

If we don’t stop this madness, and establish our own lands, Euro-Canadians will learn soon enough that the non-whites our hyper-altruistic elites usher into 24 Sussex Drive will not fritter away their demographic, political and economic gains in fruitless displays of moral superiority the way we have. A Canada run by non-white aliens and foreigners will be a shockingly different place. Competitive racial and ethnic altruism is not a game non-whites play.[ix] Canadians must force our traitorous elites to abandon policies that will, before long, destroy us all and everything that was bequeathed to us.

I should be careful what I wish for, but as far as I am concerned, the Fourth Turning can’t come soon enough. We are a people. We can create great things if left free to be ourselves and only we can be ourselves. If Canada ceases to be majority white country, it won’t be a country at all. Euro-Canadians should never give up on the idea that this country belongs, first and foremost, to us. We will fight back and the fight has, in fact, already begun. A cold wind is blowing. Winter is coming…

Okonkwo Akachukwu #racist amren.com

A Nigerian’s View of Race

Whites have become lambs, practically begging for slaughter.

When a certain leader of a certain country refers to other countries, such as Nigeria, as s**tholes, that is not the least bit racist. It is, unfortunately, merely descriptive.

The fences at the school were routinely broken so that students could bring prostitutes onto the premises for a short session. It was not at all uncommon for a young student to be attending to the call of nature at night in the overgrown grass while another would be engaging a local woman only a few yards away.

Boarding students, particularly the more vulnerable junior students, often went without food or drinking water. These basic necessities should have been covered by our school fees but the funds were almost always misappropriated by school staff. Underfeeding was so widespread that my friends and I might go for two weeks without defecating. Drinking water was sometimes so scarce that we might padlock a pail of water in a locker, only to find the lock broken by morning.

Sexual molestation of the younger students was a matter of course. The only way to avoid that was to avoid sleeping in hostels. Some of my fondest childhood memories are of sleeping on the rooftops of classroom buildings to avoid predation, swatting at mosquitoes and watching the stars and discussing the nature of the universe with close friends. I was a natural storyteller, and my friends also enjoyed these evenings.

Electricity was a problem in the hostels, so it was impossible to read at night. I used to climb the fence—not to steal or to chase whores—but to find a functioning street light. I recall finishing Stephen King’s Shawshank Redemption under a street light very close to the huge glass building known as Church Gate.

King’s College is considered an elite institution in Nigeria.

If any major British government official were to ever ask me if my people are glad the British are gone, my response would be simple. “No, we are not. Come back. Please.” There is a kind of adulation of the British that is on display when a Nigerian goes to Britain for the first time—even if only for one week—and comes back with an affected British accent.

On the other hand—and I freely acknowledge this is a stark contradiction—virtually all Nigerians and Africans believe that Africa’s poverty and instability are due to European exploitation. If it weren’t for ndi onyi o cha (Igbo for “those white skins”)! I have never understood this line of reasoning. If Africa was worth plundering, why are Africans unable to plunder Africa’s resources to build their own advanced civilizations?

This African tendency to blame others for our own shortcomings is a perfectly natural, if unhealthy, coping mechanism. One cannot live year in year out in squalor, social stagnation, and rampant crime and simply accept that this is perhaps the best level at which one’s people can operate. It is far easier and all too human to push the blame elsewhere.

Another purpose for the demonization of whites by Africans is to serve as a moral justification for plundering and exploiting whites. I need not outline the very many tactics of plunder. Green-card fraudulent marriages are a common example. For years, my own family has been struggling in vain to get me to “follow tradition” by marrying an akata (Igbo slang for African-Americans) in order to get “papers.” Of course, the anchor-baby phenomenon is exploitation, as is mass migration to Europe.

A few years ago, a Nigerian friend remarked that he had survived for years in the US by never paying for groceries. Whenever he was approached by a store attendant as he wheeled his cart towards the exit, he would simply yell aggressively in our native tongue, never once pausing for breath as he made for the exit.

White guilt makes white people easy to plunder. It is why white professors everywhere give black students preferential treatment that amounts to unjust discrimination against the rest of the class.

There is something unusual about the psychological makeup of white people. It can be metaphorically described as an inner compass. Due to that inner compass, white people need very little external force or punishment. They do not need much policing, so people can apply their potential to useful activities rather than wasting time donning a uniform and swinging a night-stick.

The absence of this inner compass is why, in Nigeria, no number of police officers can enforce traffic laws at an intersection. Indeed, most traffic enforcers and police officers routinely break the laws they are supposed to uphold (and still insist on taking a bribe at every random stop).

While this inner compass has tremendous advantages for white society, one disadvantage is that members of that inwardly guided culture are prone to tremendous torments of conscience that make them vulnerable to manipulation. There seems to be a miasma of guilt inherent to the very fabric of Western culture, a feeling of inadequacy for failing to measure up to one’s internal yardstick.

Although slavery was a universal phenomenon that preceded the US, no black, Arab or Asian man ever seems to experience racial guilt because of it.

I have no idea just how far down the rabbit hole of insanity this suicidal phenomenon of white guilt will go. One thing I do know is that most cultures, especially Eastern ones, suffer little to none of the white man’s inner conundrums and have zero patience for the social shakedowns and inefficiency of black culture.

The blunt truth is, as far as blacks are concerned, whites have become lambs, practically begging for slaughter in a world filled with lean wolves. We blacks have grown accustomed, even dependent, on the easy milk of guilty teats. What will happen to us when a less masochistic civilization replaces whites?

The future I see for Africa is as an economic outpost or colony of China. We Africans possess no human capital, in an age that requires the economic leveraging of human capital. The cars in our streets do not bear African names; they bear the names of Japanese, American, French, and Italian automotive innovators.

We have no major industry other than the natural resources beneath our feet, and our elites squander the revenues on luxury items from other civilizations. We are converting our only assets into rapidly depreciating foreign trinkets and distractions.

In the natural course of things, Africa’s resources will, once again, be exploited by a civilization—in this case Chinese—that is economically and technologically superior to ours. In the next 40 years, China’s influence will be immense, and the Chinese are not sympathetic, as whites are, towards the antics of Black Lives Matter.

I doubt that the reality of our plight will ever be universally accepted by Africans. I don’t think the average Nigerian realizes just how serious the problem is. We know, deep in our hearts, that our country is not working, but what is the solution? There are only so many African migrants other countries can accept. Our problem thus becomes a world problem.

Anna S. #fundie destoryculturalmarxism.blogspot.com

What is Cultural Marxism?
Why "destory" in the URL? Well, because the purpose of this site is to de-story, to deconstruct, the nefarious anti-Western ideology of Cultural Marxism.

Cultural Marxism has been dubbed "the greatest cancer in the Western world" but few even know what it is.

Definition of Cultural Marxism:

Cultural Marxism: An offshoot of Marxism that gave birth to political correctness, multiculturalism and "anti-racism." Unlike traditional Marxism that focuses on economics, Cultural Marxism focuses on culture and maintains that all human behavior is a result of culture (not heredity / race) and thus malleable. Cultural Marxists absurdly deny the biological reality of gender and race and argue that gender and race are “social constructs”. Nonetheless, Cultural Marxists support the race-based identity politics of non-whites. Cultural Marxists typically support race-based affirmative action, the proposition state (as opposed to a nation rooted in common ancestry), elevating non-Western religions above Western religions, speech codes and censorship, multiculturalism, diversity training, anti-Western education curricula, maladaptive sexual norms and anti-male feminism, the dispossession of white people, and mass Third World immigration into Western countries. Cultural Marxists have promoted idea that white people, instead of birthing white babies, should interracially marry or adopt non-white children. Samuel P. Huntington maintained that Cultural Marxism is an anti-white ideology. Critics of Cultural Marxism have maintained that Cultural Marxists intend to commit genocide against white people through mass non-white immigration, assimilation, transracial adoption and miscegenation.

Notable Cultural Marxists: Antonio Gramsci, Horkheimer and Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Franz Boas, Israel Ehrenberg (aka Ashley Montagu), Richard Lewontin, Stephen Jay Gould, and Others

Concepts to oppose Cultural Marxism:

Genophilia: The love of one's own race. A natural instinct that Cultural Marxists want to deny (at least for whites).

Identitarian Religion: An older form of religion that stresses ancestral obligations. Adamantly opposed by Christian Cultural Marxists (at least for whites). Throughout nearly all human history, identitarian religion (aka, ethno-religion), has been the norm.

Leukophobia: The irrational fear of whites organizing racially.

Nation: The very word 'nation' (from Latin 'nasci') implies link by blood. The traditional (non-Marxist) understanding of nation implies racial homogeneity. (Until very recently Europe has always been racially homogenous and USA, in 1960 census, was 90% white.)

Notable Quotes:

"The very essence of Cultural Marxism is the support of mass immigration / open borders."

"The end goal of Cultural Marxists is white genocide."

"Political correctness is Cultural Marxism."

"Cultural Marxists have taken over the institutions of the media, education, mainstream Christianity (conservative and liberal), law, and finance. Their goal is the annihilation of Western Civilization in general and white people in particular."

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

Tens-of-millions of young people surf the internet. It's like eye candy to them. The Devil knows this. The Devil's crowd knows this. The Illuminati, music industry and Hollywood know this. Sadly, many Christians are woefully ignorant of this, or even worse, indifferent about it. I realize that a single webpage like this is as a lone voice crying in the wilderness of cyberspace, which pales in comparison to the billions of hits received by the ungodly music videos produced by the music industry. Albeit, if even 1-in-100 young people are influenced by my Christian articles to break free of the Satanic grip of Taylor Shift, even if 1-in-1000, my labor hasn't been wasted.

Godless slutty celebrity Taylor Swift has a new shameful music video in May of 2015 titled, “BAD BLOOD.” She certainly has bad character and judgment. If you've followed the music career of Taylor Swift, then you know she began as a princess-like character... Miss goodness, the Christian girl, the young lady that most parents want their daughter to become. Now, just a few years later, Taylor Swift is a super-slut, with her legs open, wearing nothing but bedroom attire, as if ready to have sex on her wedding night for the world to see in her “Bad Blood” video by VEVO. SLUT ALERT! SLUT ALERT!!!

Taylor Swift's horrible lewd music video has posted 49,200,830 hits in just 6-days. I find that very unlikely. In December 29, 2012, The Huffington Post reported an article titled, “Fake YouTube Views Cut By 2 Billion As Google Audits Record Companies' Video Channels.” So as you can see, YouTube statistics are manipulated by the record industry, to give the false impression that everybody and their dog support Taylor Swift's Godless lewdness and sensual filth. Also, I chose not to link to the video because the Jewish owned 'The Huffington Post' promotes much lewdness and sexually suggestive indecent content on their webpages. I have nothing against any ethnic group, but from Jewish Hollywood to Jewish media outlets, they all promote the most wicked, vile, lewd, sleazy, and sexually-suggestive perverse filth!!! As a born-again Christian I am speaking out against it!!! Such filth is destroying American culture and the home. They ought to be ashamed, all of them!!!

In the following screenshot, a male actor is starring directly up Taylor Swift's skirt. This is wickedness!!! Notice that they put dark glasses on the male so that he couldn't see anything. This is evil, teaching young girls that this type of unladylike and slutty behavior is acceptable. Have you ever seen anybody in the office at work act this way? People may laugh, but this is the type of morally reprehensible sexual immorality that brings the judgment of God. The video promotes adultery!!! ...

[...]

Taylor Swift's perversion, immorality, impudent facial looks, and rebellious behavior is destructive, turning our youth into revolutionaries. It was murderous Russian dictator Vladimir Lenin who correctly said, “The best revolutionary is a youth devoid of morals.” You are being programmed young people! You are being made fools of! The Devil wants you!!! It Just Doesn't Make Sense (MP3, Pastor Jack Hyles; what has the Devil ever done for you? Why should you follow him?).

Proverbs 12:4, “A virtuous woman is a crown to her husband: but she that maketh ashamed is as rottenness in his bones.” In 1954 the famous baseball player Joe DiMaggio became very upset, understandably, when his whorish wife Marilyn Monroe allowed adulterous Hollywood producers to repeatedly film her naked body with her skirt lifted all the way up. The producers used large floor fans to blow her skirt all the way up, exposing her panties, buttocks, thighs and sexy body for everyone to see. As a consequence of the shamefully immoral incident, Marilyn filed for separation and then divorce ...

One of Monroe's most notable film roles was shot in September 1954, a skirt-blowing key scene for The Seven Year Itch in New York City. In it, she stands with her co-star, Tom Ewell, while the air from a subway grating blows her skirt up. A large crowd watched as director Billy Wilder ordered the scene to be refilmed many times. Joe DiMaggio was reported to have been present and infuriated by the spectacle. After a quarrel, witnessed by journalist Walter Winchell, the couple returned to California where they avoided the press for two weeks, until Monroe announced that they had separated. Their divorce was granted in November 1954.

SOURCE: Marilyn Monroe

I don't blame Joe DiMaggio for being jealous and getting upset. That's the way a husband is supposed to act. A husband and wife ought to be jealous over each other. When you love someone you are jealous over them. The modern-day, sicko type of open-relationships in America, where married couples engage in swinger orgies and sexually share each other is demonic. This is the lifestyle that lewd music videos promote. Taylor Swift posses in Playboy-like scenes in her video Bad Blood, making facial expressions as if enjoying sexual ecstasy in carnal knowledge, while sensually dancing for the pervert cameramen to record everything, with “UH, UH, UH, UH” sex sounds continually in the background. Am I the only decent-minded born-again Christian who sees something extremely wrong, evil and alarming about Taylor Swift's whoredom??? I didn't go looking for her video, it appeared in mainstream news and I checked it out to see what the Illuminati are promoting now.

It is evil for Taylor Swift to expose her thighs and private area for the world to see. Such shameful and despicable behavior in music videos sends a loud message to tween and teen girls that it is acceptable to dress and act like a two-bit whore. It is very wrong for any woman or little girl to behave seductively in public. Americans are sick people, who have embraced pedophilia on television as acceptable, while hating the act itself. In reality, we are a nation in denial. Nearly all Hollywood and music producers are total hopeless perverts. The next time you hear Taylor Swift admitting to Oprah Winfrey that she realizes how much of a ROLE MODEL she (Taylor) is to young girls, they should play her perverted Bad Blood video and the background sounds.... with “UH, UH, UH, UH” sex sounds. Is that the sicko role model you want for your daughter? That's Taylor Swift! My friend, I am being frankly honest, but extremely evil times call for extreme preaching!!!

PLEASE, BEWARE OF TAYLOR SWIFT'S MUSIC AND VIDEOS, BECAUSE SHE'LL LEAD YOUR DAUGHTER INTO WHOREDOM!!! You won't become who you decide to be in 5-years, you'll become who you decide to be around. I want to be like Jesus Christ, not the Devil. Taylor Swift is a little spoiled brat who doesn't care about you. Miss Swift may visit one of her millions of spiritual sick fans while they're physically sick to boost her image, but she's the scum of the earth and a loser nobody in Heaven's eyes. When this earthly life is over, Taylor Swift's name won't even be known in Heaven. The name of the wicked shall rot the Bible says. Proverbs 10:7, “The memory of the just is blessed: but the name of the wicked shall rot.” THE END

David J. Stewart #racist jesus-is-savior.com

The Jewish Hollywood moguls long ago decided that it would help them make more money if the general public viewed films as being "Christian." In fact, they personally wanted to blend in with the Gentile community. Thus Samuel Goldfish changed his name to Goldwyn and Cecil B. de Mille insisted that he was a Gentile until his death when a Rabbi officiated at his funeral. Every single one of the original Jewish developers of the movie industry divorced their Jewish wives and married beautiful Christian starlets.

This includes Louis B. Mayer, Samuel Goldwyn, Jack Warner, David O. Selznick and Harry Cohen. They gave orders to the numerous Jews they made "stars" to change their Jewish names to Christian sounding ones. This has also included a lot of "nosejobs" for both Jewish male and female stars. Here are but a few who followed this road to stardom.

Here are a list of many Hollywood actors and their real Jewish names . . .

Joey Adams ................................ Joseph Abramowitz
Eddie Albert ................................. Eddie Heimberger
Woody Allen................................. Allen Konigsberg
Lauren Bacall .............................. Joan Perske
Jack Benny .................................. Benny Kubelsky
Milton Berle .................................. Milton Berlinger
Ernest Borgnine ........................... Effron Borgnine
George Burns .............................. Nathan Birnbaum
Joan Blondell................................ Rosebud Blustein
Joyce Brothers ............................ Joyce Bauer
Mel Brooks .................................. Melvin Kaminsky
Joey Bishop ................................ Joey Gottlieb
Charles Bronson ......................... Charles Buchinsky
Rona Barrett ................................ Rona Burnstein
Cyd Chrisse ................................. Tula Finklea
Tony Curtis .................................. Bernie Schwartz (daughter is Jamie Lee Curtis)
Joan Crawford ............................. Lucille Le Sueur
Dyan Cannon ............................... Samile Friesen
Kirk Douglas ................................ Isadore Demsky (son is Michael Douglas)
Bob Dylan .................................... Robert Zimmerman
Rodney Dangerfield .................... Jacob Cohen
Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. ................. Douglas Ullman
Joel Grey ..................................... Joel Katz (father of Jennifer Grey)
Elliott Gould ................................. Elliott Goldstein
Zsa Zsa Gabor ............................ Sara Gabor
John Garfield .............................. Jules Garfinkle
Judy Garland ............................... Frances Gumm
Paulette Goddard ........................ Paulette Levy
Eydie Gorme................................. Edith Gormezano
Cary Grant ................................... Larry Leach
Lorne Green ................................ Chaim Leibowiz
Judy Holliday ............................... Judith Tuvin
Leslie Howard .............................. Leslie Stainer
Buddy Hackett ............................. Leonard Hacker
Jill St. John ................................. Jill Oppenheim
Danny Kaye................................. David Kominsky
Alan King ..................................... Irwin Kniberg
Larry King.................................... Larry Zeiger
Tina Louise.................................. Tina Blacker
Ann Landers................................. Esther Friedman (Abigail Van Buren is her sister.)
Dorothy Lamour .......................... Dorothy Kaumeyer
Miehael Landon .......................... Mike Orowitz
Steve Lawrence .......................... Sidney Leibowitz
Hal Linden.................................... Hal Lipsh**z
Jerry Lewis ................................. Joseph Levitch
Karl Maiden ................................. Maiden Sekulovitch
Paul Muni .................................... Muni Weisenfreund
Ethel Merman ............................. Ethel Zimmerman
Jan Murray ................................. Murray Janofsky
Walter Matthau ........................... Walter Matasschanskayasky
Lilly Palmer ................................. Maria Peiser
Jan Pierce................................... Pincus Perelmuth
Roberta Peters.............................Roberta Peterman
Eleanor Parker............................. Ellen Friedlob
Joan Rlvers ............................... Joan Molinsky
Tony Randall ............................. Sidney Rosenberg
Edward G. Robinson .................. Emanuel Goldenberg
Dinah Shore ............................... Francis Rose Shore
Shelly Winters ............................ Shirley Schrift
Winona Ryder..................... Laura Horowitz
Gene Wilder............................... Jerome Silberman

If your Jewish, be proud of it. Why change your name to hide your real identity? The answer is obvious. Because if the public knew THE TRUTH that Hollywood and the television networks are Jewish owned and controlled, many people would think twice and stop watching. Nobody likes to be manipulated, whether physically, emotionally, mentally or spiritually. Anything based upon a lie is not something that Christians ought want to be a part of. I don't like Hollywood's deception, anymore than I do their immoral filth that has corrupted America's homes for the Devil.

Research and you will find, that Judaism rejects Jesus as the Messiah 100%, and those unbelieving Jews are behind the most vile smut, filth and sexual immorality imaginable in society today. They revel in it, and the profits! Wherever Jesus Christ is not found, neither is morality and righteousness. If I were a part of the shameful culture of Hollywood, which glorifies wickedness and blasphemes the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, I guess I'd change my name too in embarrassment.

Mike King #racist tomatobubble.com

Break out the violins and pass the tissues. Little David Brooks of the New York Slimes & PBS fame is about to school us dumb goyim about the dangers and root causes of "anti-Semitism" TM; and, more importantly, how to "effectively stand against it" -- like banning books from Amazon, we presume?

On "anti-Semitism"TM in the Arab world:

"This is a form of derangement, a flight from reality even in otherwise sophisticated people.This form of anti-Semitism cannot be reasoned away because it doesn’t exist on the level of reason."

So, Arab suffer from "derangement," eh David? Of course, their sentiments have nothing to do with the brutal treatment which the Israeli military (which Brooks' son volunteered to serve in!) metes out to the poor and dispossessed Palestinians, and its historical unprovoked attacks upon nearby Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and even, clandestinely, Iran. No. It's all about the "derangement."

On "anti-Semitism" TM in Europe:

"In Europe, anti-Semitism looks like a response to alienation. It’s particularly high where unemployment is rampant."

Well, at least "alienation" is not as severe of a neurosis as "derangement," but here again, Brooks attributes "anti-Semitism" TM to a mental complex. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the Jewish-owned debt-based monetary system that is choking the life out of the European economies; or the fact that Jewish elites, by their own admission, are playing the "leading role" in "multi-culturalizing" Europe; flooding the dying continent with wave upon wave of Turd World immigration.

On "anti-Semitism" TM in America (which Brooks admits is minimal)

"There are others who see anti-Semitism as another form of bigotry. But these are different evils. Most bigotry is an assertion of inferiority."

Yes. That's it David! Like our neurotic counterparts in the Middle East and Europe, we Americans who are concerned about the negative impact of Jewish Marxism and Zionism are also mentally unhinged -- just envious losers who suffer from a "inferiority complex." Never mind the fact that sex-crazed Jewish Hollywood is corrupting our children, or that the Jewish Central Bank is debasing our currency, or that the Jewish Lobby wants us to shed blood for Israel, or that the Jewish-run media is propagandizing the public with fake news, or that Jewish academia persecutes scholars who dare to question the conventional accounts of World War II and the Holocaust TM. No. Our sentiments are all about "inferiority complex."

In other words: "Some Americans hate us only because we are more talented and smarter than they are."

In Brooks' insular world, any criticism of the actions of organized Jewry is evidence of a mental disease. The Jews have nothing to answer for; not now, nor in the annals of the 3,000 year old history of "anti-Semitism"TM. The "anti-Semitism"TM of ancient Rome must have been due to "schizophrenia." In Persia, "bi-polar disorder." In Medieval Europe, "paranoia." In Tsarist Russia, "anorexia nervosa." In Latin America, "attention deficit disorder." In Africa, "sickle cell anemia." In Southeast Asia, "anxiety disorder." On Planet Mars, "agoraphobia."

Brook's Bolshevik bullshit is breathtaking to behold. This from same man who wrote in 2005:

"A few years ago, I wrote a book about the rise of a new educated class, the people with 60's values and 90's money who go to Starbucks, shop at Whole Foods and drive Volvos. A woman came up to me after one of my book talks and said, 'You realize what you’re talking about is the Jews taking over America.'

My eyes bugged out, but then I realized she was Jewish and she knew that I was, too, and between us we could acknowledged there’s a lot of truth in that statement. For the Jews were the vanguard of a social movement that over the course of the 20th century transformed the American university system and the nature of the American elite." (here)

Thanks for letting that bit of truth slip out, David. It shall be used against you.

Shakespeare was on to the age-old "anti-Semitism"TM routine:

"If you prick us do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not avenge?"

- Shylock the money lender from 'The Merchant of Venice' (now banned in virtually all U.S. High Schools!) pleads his case before a magistrate; passionately explaining why he should be allowed to literally cut out a "pound of flesh" from a bankrupt debtor.

High Priest Hooded Cobra 666 #racist spiritual-satanist-neo.tumblr.com

I teach Odinism to the... (((Odinists)))

The BIGGEST *LIE* about White religions is the spoken and judaic ‘fact’ that somehow, all White people didn’t really practice spirituality, or that their spirituality was not legit or largely practiced, or things along these lines. The minor form of this is that they were slobs who didn’t really bother with all of that and just focused on the physical realm. Which is untrue, as they were excellent in both.

If they didn’t bother with Spirituality and their faiths were in vain, why does the enemy jew want to exterminate us to the last man, woman and child, which they openly did so in the middle ages, and after that imposed judeo-christianity? All the unspiritual, dumb people of these “Races” are alive, and all the high, hierarchic, spiritual castes have been destroyed, same as any otherwise successful person, killed, tortured and chased to death in the witch hunts, middle ages, and many other incidents. While the normal, everyday, jeboo race traitor sloths, and submissive cucks, have always had it easy.

So why do they go on a rampage to kill every last druid and spiritual person. While all those who are 'not interest’ make it fine by selling the soul to jeboo? Do you do this to people who don’t matter, or who are just believing into 'useless’ things?

The second room of the same lies goes that Whites have always had the 'orthological/pure logic’ type of thought (materialism under a new name, which was inspired by Spinoza and other jews, and passed down as a 'thinking system- mind you all these jews were deep into the occult and judeo-kabbalah themselves). This is a high jacking. The philosophers openly stated that this deals with the occult and opening up the higher consciousness. Only then is true logic materialized. Otherwise its airy jumbo, parading as theory. After all even the 'orthological’ and 'empiricists’ lies of the jews, are just funny dupes.

Even Karl Marx was deep into the occult from his Rabbi daddy, who probably taught him the divine torah since infancy. As this is what Rabbis do to their children (no, really) reading the Torah to the kids since infancy. And teach them jewish prayers since day one so that these ingrained into the deeper unconscious of their jewish generated creep ghoul. Adovating against all ownership (for the goy), he had the richest millionaire friends and backer jews of his time. And wrote a Talmud for gentile consumption, and a guide to enslavement of the Goy for non-spiritual jews. Or physical footsoldiers of the jewish agenda. Even the Stalin creep that destroyed all supposed 'religion’ had churches going in the USSR. And rejoiced himself in one of the largest, occult libraries ever. Confisicating half of it from National Socialist libraries. And Hitler’s personal library.

The Frankfurt school was the other giant joke, same as the circles of (((Germans))) and many other circles in the jewniversities of the time. Who read occult manuscripts, changed words and terms, and tried to make a jewish rehash and present it as their own discovery. While its “physical empiricism” for the Goyim, and living occult advicefor the fellow jews who knew how to read through these and through the codes. Which is exactly what xianity, islam, and all the sects of these are as well, a dupe on the goyim, lifesavers for jews.

The jews who wrote the bible were nothing but the Frankfurt School of dumbasses, just in their own prelithic times and version. And used psyop to fuck up the “goyim” and eslave their believers, turning them into creeps and people afraid to live. And all jews know it so why would they give a damn about xianity, except of exploiting the loot of gold, shekels, and endless goyim supply that it provides? Who wants to work when you can get holoLOL reparations? As for (((scientific empiricism)))…Only for the cattle again.

So who’s the empiricist, “goyim”? Only we Gentiles are supposed for that. Foolish idiots, I don’t care who they are or where, who disregard that fact, are at the best affirming that “YES I AM AN UNSPIRITUAL CATTLE” and “I THINK MY OWN CULTURE IS JUST CRAP SUPERSITION BECAUSE JEWS SAID SO AND I AM A CUCK TO THINK OUTSIDE THE JOOBOX”. This should be written down the dedication Ritual at sunday blood drinking, down the jeboo church, for every person going there. We can add “YES I AM A CUCK THAT CONDONES MY PEOPLE STAY ENSLAVED DUE TO SPIRITUAL IGNORANCE” in the form as well. “Check”. That’s all.

These lies are created by the jews, and these are to misdirect even the most studied White people into becoming Goyim (spiritually inaware animals), which leads to xianity in the first place, and make them dumb men who think that all 'religion’ is useless nonsense as a result of that. Or just useless superstition. And that sort of like our Ancestors were just dumb uncivilized cattle, living in nature, just having sex in forests, and not minding a thing, while drinking mead and acting drunkard like the show “Vikings”. Where the jeboo protagonist is a shill to the judeo-christianity, made into a Hero…Cohencidentally. The line goes…And that even the Vikings were supposedly dumb idiots that took a ship and took turns over the planet, just to pillage, rape and fight, while stoning themselves with mead.

This is the classical jewish story on how the civilizers of the planet all were retarded “Goyim” without a spiritual culture. Which then the jews try to translate into that only them out of all the “Goyim” had spiritual culture. Even if you have the Pyramids, or China, or even nowadays, advanced Nordic and non White culture in so many places. Hindus are nuts, everyone is nuts, except of jews. Jeboo is the new normal.

After all as the jewish jewdicial system goes, even if one is a criminal and its not found, they are not a criminal. In the same way, if the church for a 1000 years desecrated all these deeper occult things from White people, these don’t exist.

Many 'wise Whites’ who are also 'studied’ do fall in other traps, such as the “Loki Vs Odin” meme. Which is a systematic Christianity 2.0, bleached from the jewish names, into a new meme, where Loki is the bad guy, and Odin is the good guy. Its the same old Hegelian crap, in a new uniform.

The same goes for the other legends about the 'Dragon’ and the 'Great Wolf’ that need to be 'killed’, and the judeo-cucks tying this to the jew, “Saint George”. However in the occult lore, this is not a killing of “Evil”, neither a message for a supposed cosmological battle such as the jewish 'apocalypse’ that many shills and fools of the enemy try to pass it down. For easy consumption for the xianized, 'goyim’ who can’t live without this stupid and bizarre jewish mindset.

image

Well, While Odin is the Crown, Loki symbolized the Base chakra. The Yggdrasil Tree is actually the Soul, linking the upper and the lower world (Astral and Physical). When the Dragon is looming on the lower side of the tree, its a dragon or a serpent, but when the Eagle, takes the Serpent and raises it up on the top of the Tree (Valhalla) here its said the Serpent can see the world. This was of course ripped by the jews into becoming the “Tree of Life” in the jewish kabbalistic, excrement.

image

And becomes in some legends the actual Eagle, which was the symbol of the National Socialists and as thus the Risen Serpent. Becomes the Eagle. The Eagle is the same symbol nowadays, and it still is shown with the serpent. The Serpent is also never shown dead in any of these inscriptions, but well alive. The National Socialists used the Eagle as the sing of the Risen Serpentine consciousness and the Consciousness of the Race. While the Kundalini Serpent if left untamed and dormant, brings one to 'hel’, if ascended and uplifted, it brings one to Asgard/Valhalla. Its not 'evil’. Its a force of consciousness.

“Oy Vey the National Socialists were xian cucks!”. Just where? Even their symbol here shows the Risen Serpentine consciousness. Over the Far Eastern Swastika. Because this is who we are. Satanic Pagans, and this is whom we always were. People such as Himmler practiced all of the above, because this is our Racial-cultural heritage. One the large scale, this is Satanism, and applies in different forms to all Gentile people. Real, Satanic, Clean from jewish veneer, Odinism, is just the purest doctrine of “Spiritual Satanism”.

image

The fight of Odin to conquer the Dragon, is the struggling to bring this manifold force of the Serpent under one’s control, and draw it upward. This results in the 'inevitable world destruction’ upon which all Gods clash (the positive and the negative aspects of the Soul) and the world is destroyed (this is the real “cosmological” battle with the Soul being the “World”). Everything is then destroyed and degenerated.

All the positive Gods die, Loki kills Baldur (the God of Light) and most other Gods are also slaughtered by the 'forces of evil’, which mainly deal with the Nigredo stage of the Magnum Opus (which is akin to the death of the individual, and the complete loss of every 'hope’ and 'light’). After this there is resurrection. In the second battle, the Gods of light win, and the world is restored, then we have the fable about controlling everything again.

The “Berserker rage” is a spiritual term for the energies of the Soul/Serpent, that lead to apotheosis, and make someone do impossible deeds. This is well documented in how people nowadays while threatened, they can lift cars and things like that. As for an occult term, its the flooding of the energy. The warrior fights best when they drink enough MEAD- mead is the spiritual energy or force.

As after the war is over. Then The Gods reinstate everything on their positions, and the Gods go along again together. There is no 'death’ of the 'evil Gods’. Because they are not evil. Meanwhile xianity promises the KILLING of the dragon, or the Kundalini Serpent. So that people will forever fall in spiritual shackles. “Odin” is actually, except of the “God”, he is not the strongest “God”, but also symbolic of the man who seeks enlightenment and practices for it. Odin sacrifices his eye, because the eye is actually a metaphor for the overly physical perception. This has to be sacrificed, and only 'one’ eye remains, which is symbolic of the third eye, or the True vision.

The Captone in Egypt which the kikes stolen is also from that, same as the Cyclops that are written in Odyssey. In the Greek fable, the hero Odesseus has to kill the giant cyclops that is blind, by plucking him in the eye with a spear. The spear is symbolic of the spine, and Kundalini energy, the spearhead going into the head. So the cyclops, third eye or the second sight is conquered.

The whole 'battle’ is a guide for the Magnum Opus and purification of the Soul, so that one can reach the Godhead, in all of these Aryan fables. Its the same pattern. The same pattern the jews sold and they are now selling as legitimate 'white’ culture, for the uneducated 'goyim’. The Runes given to Odin are to be inscribed on the Tree, and with Blood (lifeforce), the Tree, is the Yggdrasil, the Soul, seat of the life, and lifeforce. Everything is connected to the tree, and all of existence. The Tree is the allegory within all civilizations, and goes back to Sumeria. Yes that place with the blue eyed statues, that was of the first to be annihilated due to being 'Satanic’. The Runes themselves are the actual “Tree” of Yggdrasil. The runes are to be carved on the Tree (the Human Soul) and when carved correctly, one attains the powers of the Gods. Externally, these can be used as magick.

The chanting/vibrating and singing does that. You can see below here, the “Tree” that is the Soul, and all the powers adjusted on it. These are the 'carvings’ that need to be done on the tree. The Tree has to be watered, so it can also grow, and this is metaphorical of the daily meditation and adherence to the spiritual practice. This is what the Druids actively, and daily practiced, and all of the strong White tribes who didn’t fall first in the Middle Ages, and fought to the last man. Then the jewish jeboo infiltrated and now people think that htis is their culture. You should ask your DEAD ANCESTORS who DIED from this JEWISH CANCER, as to what this is.

image

Midgard, Asgard, and Hel are actually the three knots in the Soul and the three levels of consciousness. Hel is the lower chakras, Midgard is the Heart, and Asgard are the chakras from the Throat and up. Baldur symbolizes the divine clean, pure and indestructible light of the Soul, while Loki the everlasting darkness. Both are necessary for one’s existence, and the 'darkness’ is not what’s devoid of light, but actually the unperceived light.

The wolf 'Fenrir’ and Odin’s Valkyries, are actually the powers of the Soul, the 'polar negative’ and 'polar positive’ energies. Odin sends Valkyries to help those who fight for this war, and he prepares an army for the great war (which is the also an occult terminology for the amassment of the light, or awakening of the chakras and individual very small energy centers). These are troops that will fight against the forces of 'evil’ and attempt retaking the world (Soul) and bringing it on a higher level. Why would the Norse appreciate Loki, and use Wolves and all these 'evil’ signs as their emblems were they “evil”…Because they were NOT evil, but allegorical. All the Gods represent a chakra, and a center of consciousness.

There is no 'evil’ in the sense of judaism, and hatred against “Satan” in any other Gentile religion, except of the jewish religions. This is “Beyond Good and Evil”, and this is the core of the Aryan religion. “Evil” as in regards to jews, doesn’t have to do with any Loki, or any reverse two sided Hegelianism. Jews are not present in any of such system.

As for the names of the Gods, the names obviously change in every White culture, as these are aliases, and they change and adjust to the native populations. Which is the root of culture anyway. But the examples are always the same. For one example, Aphrodite, Venus, and Freya, Isis, Astarte are the same exact entity, under different, adjusted aliases in native populations.

The 12 God pantheons are representations of the divine energies, but also real beings and worshiped progenitors of the White people. The identities within the characters are almost identical if not entirely the same. All aliases are deeply occult, honorable titles. And obviously these entities, have different names. Same “Satanism” in the deeper core. None of the Pagan Gods is 'evil’, because none of that condones literal actions. But is occult allegories. Our people did NOT invent existential, or pseudoethical 'evil’ through the religion sense. But due to common, human, sense and ethics that come from the inside.

image

For those who doubt or misinform in regards to the Pagan origins, the Spiritual Practices, and what Whites have been practicing for thousands of years, I advise reading the following, in the SATANIC way, and by using correct judgment:

“The Eddas: The Keys to the Mysteries of the North”, by James Allen Chisholm. Has some good points, but read it in the Satanic way. This shows a lot of things on its own.

For the dumbs, dumbfucks, or victimized and misinformed who think Aryan culture is 'unspiritual’ or not 'spiritually founded’, or basically an occult culture read the following:

“Pagan Resurrection”, by Richard Rudgley - NOTE, this is a “MAINSTREAM” book so a lot of info in it is streamlined to 'act normal’ in regards to the dictatorial judeo-philliac world. Even (((independent))) made a page about it. Don’t get tangled up in all notions, just read it in a Satanic mindset. I haven’t read all of it, but there is proof on how the Aryan people were even doing yoga in it.

As of tonight, I leave many “(((Odinist shills)))” jobless, and many real White people awake from this deadly jewish slumber the jews have done to our Ancestral faiths. Please find another place to shill, or wake up and go to the real occult root of your Ancestry. Or just change the names and continue praising Jeboo, the circumcised Rabbi.

Please steal my writting and post it as your universally grasped information, but don’t forget to add some jeboo the circumcised, Rabbi Yashua was an Aryan (mandatory so that Whites remain asleep), positive cucktianity (mandatory, because just WHO can survive without a kike on your race’s neck?), shilling lawyerism (oy vey dis and dat), dumbo Truth evasionism. But I may have a copyright hanging just somewhere? I don’t know? I don’t really know. Got to keep up with the times of shillers.

Which will soon will have the shils who do this on purpose under the fucking bus. And no “Fight against Loki the evil guy” or “Jews are Loki”, “Rabbi Jesus is going to save the White Race” is going to save you from the fact that you are purposefully trolling your own Race while spewing rehashed judaism and xianity.

This is the Truth, and Satanism is the Master Key and system that encompasses all of this.

Whites are waking up.

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666

^KrazyMatty^ #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

The fact that a reptilian race of beings has interfered with human society since the beginning of modern history (modern meaning past 6,000 years), and probably far beyond that, is also extremely evidenced (every major culture on Earth speaks of them, from the Sarpa who, according to Hindu history, founded Earth-human civilisation, to the Uktena of the Cherokee, to the Sheti of the Hopi, to the Riu and Long of Japan annd China, etc.)

The Iguana-People (Itzamna) of the Mayans, the Dragons (Long) of China and Japan (Riu), the Naga and Sarpa of India, the Anunnaki (a Reptilian race, but not the Draco) and Dragon-Gods (Draco Reptilians) of Sumeria and Babylon, the Chitahuri and Imanugela of Africa, the Serpent-People of the Zuni, Hopi, Anasazi and Blood Indians (among many others), the Uktena and Tlanuhwa of the Cherokee, the Dragons of Europe, etc.

The original royal families of Europe claimed descendence from Dragons. Ambrosius (Merlin) was actually Natanleod, a British king who was said to shapeshift into a dragon. Charlemagne was called "Le Chameleon", because of his combined Hebrew and ´Dragon´ descent, and his reputed ability to shapeshift into a ´demon´ or ´dracula´ (dragon-devil). The later Emperors of Rome used dragon-symbolism and were said to shapeshift into ´Dracul´ (dragon-demons), especially the Byzantine Emperors.

The early European peoples said that humans were made when a humanoid race (sometimes referred to as ´Elves´ or ´Alfheim´) was combined with the race of Dragons (Dracula in Latin), and this hybridisation of a humanoid race with dragons to create the Adam is a recurring theme in worldwide mythology. In India, the Naga were depicted symbolically as having the heads or upper bodies of humans and the bodies of serpents. The sages of the time often referred to this as meaning ´Above is the human, Below is the dragon (Sarpa)´, and a ´mingling of seeds´. This symbolically seems to refer to a reptilian DNA base with human DNA implanted. This is exactly what the human genome looks like, with reptilian DNA ´below´ and human DNA ´above´.

And of course the Reptilians are not the only alien race to have interacted with this planet.

In Egypt they speak extensively of the ´Gods´ who brought them knowledge from the stars, and of the Lion-People who came with them (The Kilroti). They speak of them as emanating from Sirius, the Dog-Star, which in Egypt was called Isis, named for their symbolic Mother Goddess.

In Africa, the Zulu shamans bear extensive esoteric knowledge of a race of reptilians who they say control the Earth--called the Chitahuri.

In Sumeria ten thousand tablets have been found and translated which refer to an alien race which created a race of humans to work as slaves in their mines in Africa (the exact same story appears in Africa, and there are goldmines in Africa estimated by the Anglo-American company to be over 60,000 years old).

In China and Japan underground bases where the Dragon Kings live are referred to, as well as the lineage of humans from a race of ´Dragons´. (there are also many other reptilian races referred to, such as the Kappa).

In Australia the aborigines speak of a reptilian race which lives underneath the Earth and secretly governs over men. The Aboriginal chiefs have spoken of going into the Earth where these beings resided. There they claim there is extensive technology. The Aborigines say that they are descended from a race of dragon-humans that once lived on an enormous continent that spanned the entire Pacific ocean, and that most of it sank beneath the waves in ancient times, but that Australia is a remnant of it, and this is why there are so many reptilian animals there.

In China, Japan, India, Europe, South America, North America, Australia, etc. the exact same description of a 7-level reptilian hierarchy recurs.

The highest Dragons are always said to be winged, and often this is divided into two castes, one being the Bird-Dragons and one being the Winged-Dragons (this is the case in Asia).

Beneath them are Dragons with horns but no wings.

Beneath them are the Dragons with no horns, but which are considered ´true dragons´.

Beneath them are the Dragon Children or ´Watersnakes´, a race of beings often described as lizard-like humanoids, but often symbolically depicted as watersnakes, giant serpents, etc.

The hierarchy in all 7 levels is usually as follows:

1) White, Winged Dragons (sometimes with feathers, and often with icy blue eyes) (usually with horns)
2) Winged Dragons (large, but featherless and non-white) (with horns)
3) Winged Dragons (usually with horns)
4) Horned Dragons
5) True Dragons
6) Warrior Dragons (expendable caste of warriors. usually described as largest caste population-wise, as Dragons are said to be a very belligerent race).
7) Lizard-Dragons (the Untouchables. Weak, small, skinny lizard-like Dragons)

---

THE DRACO CASTE SYSTEM

In actuality, the Draco Caste System is as follows:

1) White, Winged Draco (Royalty)
2) Statesmen and Politicians
3) Religious Caste (Priests, Ritual Performers, etc.)
4) Warriors (pictured above)
5) Teachers
6) Workers
7) Drones (Lizard-like Reptilians under total mind-control who perform routine work such as abductions)

The Draco

The Illuminati, which includes 13 major Royal-descended families from Europe, were created by the Draco Reptilians.

The Royal family are not ´reptiles´, persay, but they do have more Reptilian DNA than most Earth-humans.

All humans on Earth have Draco and humanoid (Lyrian) DNA, but with a smaller percentage of Draco Reptilian than human. However, the Illuminati, created by the Draco, have a 50/50 split between human and Reptilian DNA, giving them the ability to shapeshift between the two forms as a result of many factors, including the incompatibility of human and Reptilian DNA. Mammals and Reptiles are not native to Earth. They originated on separate planets.

Only a small percentage of the Illuminati are shapeshifters, such as Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip (Duke of Edinburgh), Baron Guy de Rothschild, George H.W. Bush, David Rockefeller, etc. The rest are mostly people with a somewhat higher percentage of Reptilian DNA than usual which have been recruited by the Illuminati as a result of bloodline, lack of morals, what have you--everything the mafia would look for. Mafias in general are a Draco type of cultural creation, and most of the major ones are controlled by the Illuminati. Most intelligence agencies are as well, including the CIA, KGB ("FSB"), Mossad, etc.

In reality, there is not much truth to the idea of independent government in Europe or America anymore. These governments were always mafia/Illuminati controlled, but now it is far more centralised than before. Once, we had Hapsburg Illuminati infighting with Rothschild Illuminati. Now there is far more cooperation among the Illuminati because they know that the NWO is growing near.

The European Union is not as wonderful a thing as some uninformed people think it is. The United Nations is actually a very maniacal organisation geared at creating global government with totalitarian control. In working toward this ´dream´ of theirs, they have, among other things, distributed the AIDS virus to Africans as a means of depopulating the Black race, conquered over 90% of United States land through illegal action, murdered a team of their own scientists who were headed for a conference in Geneva regarding the AIDS virus/genocide affair, and had Kurt Waldheim, former Nazi SS soldier, as its Secretary General.

---

In terms of the Draco, they are a Reptilian race originating in the Draco star system. They were the first colonists of the planet Earth. Earth was originally a totally marine environment, with shallow marshes and seas being the closest thing to land. The Draco then decided to make it part of their strategy to use this solar system as an entry point into the rest of the galaxy--a strategic place for a military base.

Therefore, they terra-formed Earth, creating a very large continent in what is now the Pacific, commonly known as Lemuria. This Reptilian civilisation developed quite a bit until the Atlans, a human group, invaded the Earth and created their own continent, which is now known as Atlantis. There is a lot of history to this, but eventually the two groups came to a treaty (after the destruction of both of their continents), and modern Earth-humans were created as a hybrid species between them, with the DNA of other alien groups and certain animals as well.

At the moment, the Draco have quite a grip on about 90% of this planet, even controlling most aspects of Earth-human civilisation through complete domination of all major intelligence agencies, governments and mafias.

[...]

You will notice that an Amazonian shaman who is aware of Oneness and aware of his/her connection with the Earth would probably never go along with the New World Order, whereas a blonde-haired mall-going American is extremely likely to accept such a thing, both because of genetics and cultural upbringing.


It is possible because the Reptilians do exist, and are the most populous alien race inhabiting this planet at the moment. In their eyes, they own the Earth, as they were the first high-tech civilisation to colonise it circa 1 million years ago.

This is why reptiles and dinosaurs show up in the earlier paleontological record. Birds are a warm-blooded species that adapted to the mammalian energies of the Atlantean humanoids (Lyraens), who came later (circa 400,000 years ago).

Mainstream science´s view of paleontology is incorrect. Dinosaur footprints have been found with human footprints nearby, or even inside of them. Clearly the two species coincided.

Dinosaurs actually evolved on the Draco homeworld, and are the cattle and wild animals of the Draco, along with most reptiles (some were also brought by the Abbennakki). Mammals also originate off-world--mostly from the constellation Lyrae before civilisation there was destroyed during the Draco invasion, after which the Lyraens were forced to escape to the Pleiades, Arcturus, Aldebaran, Earth, etc.

Yes, the Reptilians have set in motion the Illuminati mafias as a means of manipulating this planet. An accurate source of information on the matter would be Stewart Swerdlow www.stewartswerdlow.com

Though I do not necessarily agree with everything that he says, for the most part he is an excellent source of information. I can confirm much of this from personal experience.

Princess Diana as a New World Religious Figure

Princess Diana was ritually sacrificed. Her programming was starting to break down, as was expected and planned.

She stopped hiding what she knew about the Reptilians, and yes, contacted Credo Mutwa as well as her psychic healer, "Christine Fitzgerald", who has since been threatened for revealing this information.

After her ritual sacrifice, she has become a religious icon of the New Age. This is all leading up to her future status as a saint of the New World Religion. This is really an excuse to bring back worship of the Goddess Diana.

Similarly, Ronald Reagan was ritually sacrificed, and his funeral service signified the death of America as we know it, heralding in the New World Order.

America will soon crumble economically and politically. The United Nations wil be called into "Restore Order". The United States will then be divided into two districts, Eastern and Western. The Eastern district will be Atlanta. The Western District will be Denver.

This is all planned to occur some time within the next 15 or so years--perhaps sooner. All depends upon what the Illuminati see as the appropriate times to initiate such events.

Andrea Daley Utronebel #racist amren.com

Re: Israel Is Having Far More Babies Than Any Other Developed Country

Ethnic identity and solidarity. Patriarchy, esp among the Orthodox who have most children. Social-Nationalism where the elites feel closer to national folk than to elites around the world. A nation that tells each person that they are precious member and citizen of the state bound by blood, culture, and history than an expendable economic unit to be replaced by foreigners. A tempered elitism that says even though people should strive to succeed and move up, they should regard their national kin as fellow brothers and comrades than ‘losers’ and ‘trash'(to feed with opioids). A national elite that is autonomous than cuckily in service of another elite(that is actually hostile).

In Minnesota, idiot Scandinavian Americans are cheering that they elected the first non-white Muslim woman to be a Congressman. In Ireland, they cheer their first homo hindu prime minister. I don’t think Jews will cheer for the first Palestinian leader of Israel. Yes, a first! a first! A first Palestinian leader of Israel!!!! Nah, I think Jews want to keep it a nation ruled by Jews forever and ever.

.
.
.

Now, imagine if some Polish Catholics enter Israel as immigrants. Suppose these Polish Catholics are hyper-pushy and have an IQ of 150. Though only 2% of the population, suppose they take over Israeli banking, media, academia, and etc. Suppose they buy up Israeli politicians and tell them to repeat ‘diversity is our strength’ and welcome a future in which Jews will be a minority. Suppose these Polish Catholics control media and make TV shows about the evils of Nakba and Zionist oppression of Palestinians and fill Jewish kids with ‘Jewish guilt’. Suppose they make endless movies about Holodomor and Jewish involvement in communism and deaths of millions and erect Slavocaust momuments all over Israel. Suppose endless commercials and shows on TV tell Jewish women that Jewish men are dorky losers and patriarchal oppressors and that Jewish girls should go with Muslim, black, Palestinian, and Iranian men and have mixed-race babies who are Muslim or Christian than Jewish. Suppose most Israeli politicians are cucks like Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan and suck up to Polish Catholics minority elites. Suppose Polish Catholics tell Jewish elites to look down on Jewish working class as losers who should be drugged and killed off with opioids. And if any Jewish elite person shows any sympathy or expresses any solidarity with Jewish masses, it is denounced as ‘racism’ and ‘Jewish supremacism’. OMG, how care Jewish elites care more for Jewish masses than side with Polish minority elite globalists.

Hmmm… I wonder what would happen to Israel.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

Freemasonry is a Jewish Sex Cult
by David J. Stewart

Freemasonry, Judaism, Communism, Kaballah and Mormonism are all Demonic Sex Perverted Cults! Freemasonry and Mormonism are rooted in Jewish Kaballah, an esoteric religion of black magic. Judaism is based upon Kaballah and the Talmud (which permits Jewish priests to have sex with 3-year-old girls). Mormonism is a sex-sicko cult, rooted in Jewish Kaballah. Freemasonry's primary symbol is the square and compass, representative of the male and female sex organs and shows the act of sexual intercourse. Mormonism founder, Joseph Smith was a 33rd degree Freemasonry.

Washington D.C. has been in the news repeatedly for sex-abuse at the White House. Presidents Reagan, Bush Sr., Bush Jr. .. all busted for bringing male escorts into the White House. Even worse were the tragic reports of pederasty, little boys from Nebraska's BOY'S TOWN being flown to Washington D.C. to be sexually molested by Presidents Reagan and Bush Sr. at the White House. All of these men are members of the demonic Bohemian Grove cult in California, a group notorious for homosexuality. Truth is stranger than fiction. The global elite are notorious for pedophilia, child sacrifice and Luciferian worship.

Infamous satanist, Aleister Crowley is the father of First Lady Barbara Bush (wife of President George H. Bush). All of these presidents are also high level Freemasons. Bush Jr. and Sr. are members of the homosexual cult, Skull and Bones. Homosexuality is a common denominator amongst the world elite, as a means of total debasement of all moral consciousness. No one is allowed into the inner group who does not perform acts of homosexuality as rite of initiation. To be born-again into the Order of Death (official name of Skull and Bones), initiates must lay naked in coffins and performs unspeakable sex acts, selling their souls to Satan.

[...]

Hollywood is owned by the Jewish elite. Hollywood is notorious for sexual immorality, homosexual actors and blasphemy against Jesus Christ. The American mainstream newsmedia is also owned and controlled by the Jewish elite. So are all of the social networking websites; including: Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Yahoo!, MySpace, eBay, and others. These are all Jewish owned, controlled, and censored. Search the internet for "The Jewish hand behind internet." Freemasonry is behind nearly all mainstream religions in America. Zionism is of the Devil. Obama Rothschilds Choice - America's Jewish President.

Roosh #conspiracy rooshv.com

Does The Hollywood Elite Use Rituals And Sexual Blackmail To Keep Its Stars In Line?

Most people in the mainstream already know that Hollywood is a liberal safe space that was the first to promote leftist causes such as socialism, drug use, feminism, hookup culture, atheism, environmentalism, homosexuality, and transsexualism. This can be attributed to the fact that Hollywood is run by Jews who seem to greatly dislike traditional America, small-town values, and Christianity. What’s even more peculiar is that we hardly see any infighting between Hollywood actors and the producers or executives who hire them. It’s like they’re one big happy family. Or are they?

You probably already know that the casting couch is a way for directors and producers to have sex with the female talent in exchange for jobs, but what if I were to tell you that male actors also must have sex with other men to get work, and that the top male actors in Hollywood have had to submit to degrading homosexual rituals in order to get acting jobs, and that trophies like the Oscars are not based on merit but on those who have paid their dues into the system by enduring the most humiliation, and that the degrading sexual acts all actors commit are used to keep them in line?

You’d think I’m crazy, surely, but every now and then something happens which lends credibility to “conspiracy theories” that were floating around beforehand.

A couple of months ago I found a detailed article showing how producers, writers, and directors leverage their influence to sodomize young boys. Many of those boys go on to become “heterosexual” male stars, all because they gave up the ass for a shot at fame.

“I never slept with [X-Men producer Bryan Singer] before I was 18,” he writes. “But after my 18th birthday, I was quickly passed off to him by a friend, Gary Goddard, who was having sex with me at 17. Gary was his good friend at the time, so Bryan would be out with us—with his dates of the moment, all young guys. I saw him at parties and out in LA, and we hooked up in Gary’s house when I was 18, like three days after my birthday.”

Two years ago, a compelling video was published that made outlandish claims about the Hollywood system. Here’s a sample of the claims that were made:

– Will Smith, Denzel Washington, and other big-name stars not immune from ritual sodomy
– Benny Medina and Quincy Jones sexually initiated actor Will Smith
– If someone in the Kabbalah cult likes the daughter of a star, he/she must relinquish their child in order to move up
– Queen Latifah initiates Hollywood women using a strap-on
– Monster’s Ball movie with Halle Berry and Billy Bob Thorton featured live sex ritual
– Jewish produced “Ghetto Gaggers” not just a porn but also in Hollywood
– Porn stars go to Pandora’s Box Hollywood sex parties, initiate stars
– Tony Braxton driven out of her mind over what she had to give up to be famous

Wait, Will Smith is gay? No way. The entire video must be bullshit, because Will Smith is heterosexual and masculine. He’s married with two kids. But then his wife Jada Pinkett Smith went full social justice and called for a boycott at the Oscars because it was not black enough. Only one day later, a marginal transsexual actress named Alexis Arquette came out with this, confirming what the above video stated years before

The video explained how Hollywood actors are controlled: their sexual hazing is recorded on video and used to manage their future behavior so it’s in line with Hollywood elite interests. When actors go off the rails, or refuse to submit to the demands of their bosses, “rumors” are leaked that destroy their reputation and acting jobs are withheld from them.

What I think happened is that Will Smith’s “owners” gave Alexis the information to publish in exchange for later favors while making it appear as a “leak.” But if you examine the final three sentences of the Facebook post above, it’s easy to see how those words are coming from the men who write Smith’s paycheck, warning him to get his wife in line immediately. And she did. Not even half a day later, she thanked the Academy for their response.

No further rumors about Will Smith were disseminated. Within only two days, a challenge to Hollywood’s elite seemed completely squashed. Will Smith, sitting on his $200 million fortune, did later double down and state that the boycott would take place anyway. We should now expect him to never work in a major Hollywood blockbuster again.

Consider that in Hollywood there is hardly any public infighting at all, but here in the alt sphere we have fights seemingly every week. Human nature is aggressive. People fight and argue publicly. Yet in Hollywood, everyone is calm as sheep. It could be because stars are controlled. Through submitting to hazing rituals and having gay blackmail hanging over them, they are slaves to the Hollywood elite who give them fame and money in exchange for their complete compliance, including having to display stupid Illuminati symbols in music videos and photo shoots.

Every major actor in Hollywood has made a deal with the devil, and has had to trade things that you wouldn’t, often starting when they were children and passed around to pedophiles, as Corey Feldman revealed. Therefore Hollywood looks not for talent, but for souls, explaining why you can’t even name more than five actors who are actually good. This is the industry that has sway not only among the mainstream American public, but the world as a whole.

One of my favorite actors is Leonardo DiCaprio. Before the recent Oscars, I noticed that he was spouting some social justice ideas:

On Tuesday, Leo received the Crystal Award for “improving the state of the world” at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. During his acceptance speech he called out the “corporate greed of the coal, oil and gas industries” who “have denied and even covered-up the evidence of our changing climate.”

It seemed so out of place for a man who travels around in private jets banging hoes on yachts, but then when you understand that stars must submit to rituals in order to gain favor, and that DiCaprio was up for an Oscar this year, it makes complete sense. He must satisfy his masters by helping their leftist agenda in order to receive a reward. We can only guess what private rituals DiCaprio had to submit to before becoming a top contender for the award—which he did win—especially when he was a child actor, and what gay rumor will come out about him if he ever calls for a boycott against the Oscars. There is dirt on all the stars, and even most of the famous musicians and rappers. If you research the issue further, the rabbit hole goes much deeper than what I’m describing.

My personal take is that the younger someone enters the entertainment machine, and the lower amount of natural talent they have, the more likely they have submitted to deplorable degradations in order to be famous. I wouldn’t be surprised if pop singers like Lady Gaga and Katy Perry serve as personal port-a-potties to industry bigwigs. In fact, Hollywood is probably where the Saudis got the idea to use paid “models” as hired toilets.

I write about this today not to participate in Hollywood gossip, but to shine a light in how elite circles operate. All the actors and singers that you may respect, whose views you may actually allow to influence you, have traded their dignity and their souls for fame and money. All the “masculine” Hollywood actors you like watching in films have certainly been sodomized or privately humiliated. At best, Hollywood spreads anti-male propaganda to the world. At worst, they are devil worshipers who practice every degenerate cause known to man.

I fully denounce Hollywood and their liberalism, their communism, their social justice, and their faggotry. There is no room for them in a man’s life, and I personally won’t be casually brainwashed and influenced by the anti-American and degenerate content they put out.

Wotans Krieger #racist aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk

[Responding to a Leeds Beckett University study on racism and sexism in black metal music]

This is the kind of nonsense that passes for academic research these days:

http://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/news/1015-racism-and-sexism-in-heavy-metal-highlighted-in-new-study/

If a similar study had been made about black hip hop 'music' or rap (both of which ARE overtly 'racist' (anti-white) and 'sexist' then there would have been cries of 'racism' and 'sexism'. However the white heterosexual male is the only part of mankind who appears to be exempt from the protections afforded anyone else. No wonder that there is an increasing anger and bitterness by the awakened Aryans in Europe and other parts of the 'western' world against not so much the aliens in our midst who are mere pawns in the zionists' game but an anger directed against the establishment in the 'western' world which is overtly hostile to any notions of maintaining a white European identity.

This establishment is not merely the government of the day who are mere pawns themselves but also consists of the media and the educational establishment with its multiracial, multicultural and feminist agenda. No free thinking student these days can hope to graduate from a 'western' university with a decent degree without towing the establishment line. We need to remember that the establishment in 2016 consists to a significant extent of the marxist middle class student generation of 1968 (of which my late brother was a part of) who are now in positions of power and influence in the political, educational and media fields. Despite being rebels against the establishment in the 1960s and early 1970s they have now become the establishment. Universities are a hotbed of social marxist propaganda and have been so since the 1960s.

We can also see that marxism which has now been watered down into a more politically palatable form of social liberalism which no longer opposes global capitalism but embraces it for both marxism and capitalism are zionist tools used to destabalise not only the traditional Aryan world but all parts of the world which have not hitherto fallen under the sway of the zionist 'west'. They are merely two sides of the same fake coin, presenting the illuision of difference and choice, the same illusion which is presented at the ballot box every 5 years. Both sides are controlled by the same unseen hand.

In addition to this research Professor Spracklen (a former employee of the Commission for Racial Equality) has worked alongside colleagues from his university on research projects "exploring racism and racial equality in sport, and the success of anti-racism policies." Indeed his university has a whole team of 'Race Experts'-no I am not making this up! This what universities obsess about in 2016 when the money would be better spent on real research which is scientific and technological, not shit-stirring.

Leeds by the way is a multiracial hell hole with only an 85 % white population, only 81.1% are native British. The rest is divided into 75 diverse ethnic groups. However there are worse cities than this. One only has to think of London whose white population numbers only 59.79%, the native white British being a mere 44.89% so London is no longer an English city. I recall visiting London in the early 2000s and being struck by the feeling that I felt like a foreigner in my own country. There are over 300 languages spoken in that shit hole. It can only get worse

GOP Tea Pub #fundie gop-tea-pub.tumblr.com

Ahhhh you poor poor delusional moronic douche canoe. It is truly sad that people LIKE YOU have access to the internet and refuse to do any actual research. Then have the audacity to post BS statements that have ZERO actuality to them. But, let me just school you and show you EXACTLY how asinine you and those that follow and believe you, truly are. Those that know the truth are laughing at you and your followers…laughing hysterically as a matter of fact. It must be painful to be that out of touch.

Prior to 2010, the following is what readers got when they clicked on the Democrats.org “History” button….
Democrats are unwavering in our support of equal opportunity for all Americans. That’s why we’ve worked to pass every one of our nation’s Civil Rights laws, and every law that protects workers. Most recently, Democrats stood together to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act.
On every civil rights issue, Democrats have led the fight. We support vigorous enforcement of existing laws, and remain committed to protecting fundamental civil rights in America.

This is the kind of BS spewed by Democrats on a daily basis, and unfortunately the media and other so-called watchdogs are so apparently ignorant of American history, Democrats continue to LIE through their teeth to their constituents, and via academia, to our kids. Despite the truth being out there for years, it’s probably not going to explode until some big shot news anchor gives us an “exclusive expose” bringing us all those facts first, so he/she can proudly receive a Pulitzer…

October 13, 1858 During Lincoln-Douglas debates, U.S. Senator Stephen Douglas (D-IL) states: “I do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my brother, or any kin to me whatever”; Douglas became Democratic Party’s 1860 presidential nominee

April 16, 1862 President Lincoln signs bill abolishing slavery in District of Columbia; in Congress, 99% of Republicans vote yes, 83% of Democrats vote no

July 17, 1862 Over unanimous Democrat opposition, Republican Congress passes Confiscation Act stating that slaves of the Confederacy “shall be forever free”

January 31, 1865 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous Republican support, intense Democrat opposition

April 8, 1865 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100% Republican support, 63% Democrat opposition

November 22, 1865 Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting “black codes,” which institutionalized racial discrimination

February 5, 1866 U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement “40 acres and a mule” relief by distributing land to former slaves

April 9, 1866 Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnson’s veto; Civil Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans, becomes law

May 10, 1866 U.S. House passes Republicans’ 14th
Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the laws to
all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no

June 8, 1866 U.S. Senate passes Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the law to all citizens; 94% of Republicans vote yes and 100% of Democrats vote no

January 8, 1867 Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of law granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.

July 19, 1867 Republican Congress overrides
Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans

March 30, 1868 Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson, who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men”

September 12, 1868 Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell
and 24 other African-Americans in Georgia Senate, every one a
Republican, expelled by Democrat majority; would later be reinstated by
Republican Congress

October 7, 1868 Republicans denounce Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule”

October 22, 1868 While campaigning for re-election, Republican U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR) is assassinated by Democrat terrorists who organized as the Ku Klux Klan

December 10, 1869 Republican Gov. John Campbell
of Wyoming Territory signs FIRST-in-nation law granting women right to
vote and to hold public office

February 3, 1870 After passing House with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, granting vote to all Americans regardless of race

May 31, 1870 President U.S. Grant signs Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff penalties for depriving any American’s civil rights

June 22, 1870 Republican Congress creates U.S. Department of Justice, to safeguard the civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South

September 6, 1870 Women vote in Wyoming, in FIRST election after women’s suffrage signed into law by Republican Gov. John Campbell

February 28, 1871 Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection for African-American voters

April 20, 1871 Republican Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups
which oppressed African-Americans

October 10, 1871 Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against black voting, African-American Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto murdered by Democratic Party operative; his military funeral was attended by thousands

October 18, 1871 After violence against
Republicans in South Carolina, President Ulysses Grant deploys U.S.
troops to combat Democrat terrorists who formed the Ku Klux Klan

November 18, 1872 Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady Stanton that she voted for “the Republican ticket, straight”

January 17, 1874 Armed Democrats seize Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to racially integrate government

September 14, 1874 Democrat white supremacists
seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to overthrow racially-integrated
administration of Republican Governor William Kellogg; 27 killed

March 1, 1875Civil Rights Act of 1875,
guaranteeing access to public accommodations without regard to race,
signed by Republican President U.S. Grant; passed with 92% Republican
support over 100% Democrat opposition

January 10, 1878 U.S. Senator Aaron Sargent (R-CA) introduces Susan B. Anthony amendment for women’s suffrage; Democrat-controlled Senate defeated it 4 times before election of Republican House and Senate guaranteed its approval in 1919. Republicans foil Democratic efforts to keep women in the kitchen, where they belong

February 8, 1894 Democrat Congress and Democrat
President Grover Cleveland join to repeal Republicans’ Enforcement Act,
which had enabled African-Americans to vote

January 15, 1901 Republican Booker T. Washington protests Alabama Democratic Party’s refusal to permit voting by African-Americans

May 29, 1902 Virginia Democrats implement new
state constitution, condemned by Republicans as illegal, reducing
African-American voter registration by 86%

February 12, 1909 On 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, African-American Republicans and women’s suffragists Ida Wells and Mary Terrell co-found the NAACP

May 21, 1919 Republican House passes
constitutional amendment granting women the vote with 85% of Republicans
in favor, but only 54% of Democrats; in Senate, 80% of Republicans
would vote yes, but almost half of Democrats no

August 18, 1920 Republican-authored 19th Amendment, giving women the vote, becomes part of Constitution; 26 of the 36 states to ratify had Republican-controlled legislatures

January 26, 1922 House passes bill authored by
U.S. Rep. Leonidas Dyer (R-MO) making lynching a federal crime; Senate
Democrats block it with filibuster

June 2, 1924
Republican President Calvin Coolidge signs bill passed by
Republican Congress granting U.S. citizenship to all Native
Americans

October 3, 1924 Republicans denounce three-time
Democrat presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan for defending the
Ku Klux Klan at 1924 Democratic National Convention

June 12, 1929 First Lady Lou Hoover invites wife
of U.S. Rep. Oscar De Priest (R-IL), an African-American, to tea at the
White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country

August 17, 1937 Republicans organize opposition
to former Ku Klux Klansman and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black,
appointed to U.S. Supreme Court by FDR; his Klan background was hidden
until after confirmation

June 24, 1940 Republican Party platform calls
for integration of the armed forces; for the balance of his terms in
office, FDR refuses to order it.

August 8, 1945 Republicans condemn Harry
Truman’s surprise use of the atomic bomb in Japan. The whining and
criticism goes on for years. It begins two days after the Hiroshima
bombing, when former Republican President Herbert Hoover writes to a
friend that “The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing
of women and children, revolts my soul.”

September 30, 1953 Earl Warren, California’s
three-term Republican Governor and 1948 Republican vice presidential
nominee, nominated to be Chief Justice; wrote landmark decision in Brown
v. Board of Education

November 25, 1955 Eisenhower administration bans racial segregation of interstate bus travel

March 12, 1956 Ninety-seven Democrats in
Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of
Education, and pledge to continue segregation

June 5, 1956 Republican federal judge Frank Johnson rules in favor of Rosa Parks in decision striking down “blacks in the back of the bus” law

November 6, 1956 African-American civil rights
leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican
Dwight Eisenhower for President

September 9, 1957 President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republican Party’s 1957 Civil Rights Act

September 24, 1957 Sparking criticism from
Democrats such as Senators John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, President
Dwight Eisenhower deploys the 82nd Airborne Division to Little Rock, AR
to force Democrat Governor Orval Faubus to integrate public schools

May 6, 1960 President Dwight Eisenhower signs
Republicans’ Civil Rights Act of 1960, overcoming 125-hour,
around-the-clock filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats

May 2, 1963 Republicans condemn Democrat sheriff
of Birmingham, AL for arresting over 2,000 African-American
schoolchildren marching for their civil rights

September 29, 1963 Gov. George Wallace (D-AL) defies order by U.S. District Judge Frank Johnson, appointed by President Dwight Eisenhower, to integrate Tuskegee High School

June 9, 1964 Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV)

June 10, 1964 Senate Minority Leader Everett
Dirksen (R-IL) criticizes Democrat filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights
Act, calls on Democrats to stop opposing racial equality. The Civil
Rights Act of 1964 was introduced and approved by a staggering majority
of Republicans in the Senate. The Act was opposed by most southern
Democrat senators, several of whom were proud segregationists—one of
them being Al Gore Sr. Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson relied on
Illinois Senator Everett Dirksen, the Republican leader from Illinois,
to get the Act passed.

August 4, 1965 Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) overcomes Democrat attempts to block 1965 Voting Rights Act; 94% of Senate Republicans vote for landmark civil right legislation, while 27% of Democrats oppose. Voting Rights Act of 1965, abolishing literacy tests and other measures devised by Democrats to prevent African-Americans from voting, signed into law; higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats vote in favor

February 19, 1976 President Gerald Ford formally
rescinds President Franklin Roosevelt’s notorious Executive Order
authorizing internment of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII

September 15, 1981 President Ronald Reagan
establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges
and Universities, to increase African-American participation in federal
education programs

June 29, 1982 President Ronald Reagan signs 25-year extension of 1965 Voting Rights Act

August 10, 1988 President Ronald Reagan signs Civil Liberties Act of 1988, compensating Japanese-Americans for deprivation of civil rights and property during World War II internment ordered by FDR

November 21, 1991 President George H. W. Bush signs Civil Rights Act of 1991 to strengthen federal civil rights legislation

August 20, 1996 Bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan
Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial discrimination in adoptions, part of
Republicans’ Contract With America, becomes law

And let’s not forget the words of liberal icon Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood…We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably
with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The
most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious
appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate
the Negro population…so the next time any Democrat claims they’ve been supportive of civil rights in America (and been so all along), ask them to explain their past. “We’ve grown” is not gonna cut it, considering they continue to
lie about their past to this day, and only someone lacking in common
sense would believe two distinct political parties could juxtaposition
their stances on civil rights seemingly overnight.

The left is quite annoyed that myself and others dare link the racist, segregationist past in this country to Democrats, at that flies
in the face of everything they claim to champion, when it comes to civil
rights, racial tolerance, etc.

The Democrats’ own website,
to this day, attempts to take fraudulently credit for the civil rights
movement and legislation, and when called on it, the recitation is the
same: “we’ve grown” and “don’t forget about the Dixiecrats”.

Defensive liberals claim the Dixiecrats, as a whole, defected from the Democrat Party when President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (no thanks to Democrats), and became Republicans which they claimed were more accepting of segregationist policies.

Well, I decided to get some opinions on the matter from some historians.I contacted Professor Larry Schweikart of the University of Dayton for advice. Larry and I worked on a documentary based on a chapter on Ronald Reagan from his best-selling book, A Patriot’s History of the United States.

The idea that “the Dixiecrats joined the Republicans” is
not quite true, as you note. But because of Strom Thurmond it is
accepted as a fact. What happened is that the **next** generation (post
1965) of white southern politicians — Newt, Trent Lott, Ashcroft,
Cochran, Alexander, etc — joined the GOP.

So it was really a passing of the torch as the old segregationists
retired and were replaced by new young GOP guys. One particularly
galling aspect to generalizations about “segregationists became GOP” is
that the new GOP South was INTEGRATED for crying out loud, they accepted
the Civil Rights revolution. Meanwhile, Jimmy Carter led a group of
what would become “New” Democrats like Clinton and Al Gore.

Larry also suggested I contact Mike Allen, Professor of History at
the University of Washington, Tacoma (who also appeared in the Reagan
documentary) for input.
There weren’t many Republicans in the South prior to 1964, but that doesn’t mean the birth of the souther GOP was tied to “white racism.” That said, I am sure there were and are white racist southern GOP. No one would deny that. But it was the southern Democrats who were the party of slavery and, later, segregation. It was George Wallace, not John Tower, who stood in the southern schoolhouse door to block desegregation! The vast majority of Congressional GOP voted FOR the Civil Rights of 1964-65. The vast majority of those opposed to thoseacts were southern Democrats. Southern Democrats led to infamous filibuster of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

The confusion arises from GOP Barry Goldwater’s vote against the ’64
act. He had voted in favor or all earlier bills and had led the
integration of the Arizona Air National Guard, but he didn’t like the
“private property” aspects of the ’64 law. In other words, Goldwater
believed people’s private businesses and private clubs were subject only
to market forces, not government mandates (“We reserve the right to
refuse service to anyone.”) His vote against the Civil Rights Act was
because of that one provision was, to my mind, a principled mistake.

This stance is what won Goldwater the South in 1964, and no doubt
many racists voted for Goldwater in the mistaken belief that he opposed
Negro Civil Rights. But Goldwater was not a racist; he was a libertarian
who favored both civil rights and property rights.

Switch to 1968.Richard Nixon was also a proponent of Civil Rights;
it was a CA colleague who urged Ike to appoint Warren to the Supreme Court; he was asupporter of Brown v. Board, and favored sending troops to integrate
Little Rock High). Nixon saw he could develop a “Southern strategy”
based on Goldwater’s inroads. He did, but Independent Democrat George
Wallace carried most of the deep south in 68. By 1972, however, Wallace
was shot and paralyzed, and Nixon began to tilt the south to the GOP.
The old guard Democrats began to fade away while a new generation of
Southern politicians became Republicans. True, Strom Thurmond switched
to GOP, but most of the old timers (Fulbright, Gore, Wallace, Byrd etc
etc) retired as Dems.

Why did a new generation white Southerners join the GOP? Not because
they thought Republicans were racists who would return the South to
segregation, but because the GOP was a “local government, small
government” party in the old Jeffersonian tradition. Southerners wanted
less government and the GOP was their natural home.

Jimmy Carter, a Civil Rights Democrat, briefly returned some states
to the Democrat fold, but in 1980, Goldwater’s heir, Ronald Reagan,
sealed this deal for the GOP. The new “Solid South” was solid GOP.

BUT, and we must stress this: the new southern Republicans were
*integrationist* Republicans who accepted the Civil Rights revolution
and full integration while retaining their love of Jeffersonian limited
government principles.

And what did Malcolm X say about the “Dixiecrats”…?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkgA2rUAY-o&feature=player_embedded


http://www.black-and-right.com/the-democrat-race-lie/

http://www.black-and-right.com/2010/03/19/the-dixiecrat-myth/

So, there you have it. YOU are WRONG. YOU are UNEDUCATED. YOU refused to do RESEARCH. YOU look like a FOOL. Next time, try actually looking something up, instead of blatantly spewing lies and expecting people to believe you. BUT, if you need more clarification…I have that too, because I, unlike you, am not afraid to search for the truth.

REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS DID NOT SWITCH SIDES ON RACISM By Frances Rice

As a result of unrelenting efforts by Democrats to shift their racist past onto the backs of Republicans, using the mantra: “the parties switched sides”, a lot of people have requested an article addressing this issue.

It does not make sense to believe that racist Democrats suddenly rushed into the Republican Party, especially after Republicans spent nearly 150 years fighting for black civil rights. In fact, the racist Democrats declared they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than a Republican because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks.

From the time of its inception in 1854 as the anti-slavery party, the Republican Party has always been the party of freedom and equality for blacks. As author Michael Scheuer wrote, the Democratic Party is the party of the four S’s: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism. Democrats have been running black communities for the past 50+ years, and the socialist policies of the Democrats have turned those communities into economic and social wastelands.

An alarming view of what America will be like in a few years due to unbridled socialism being pushed by President Barack Obama and his Democratic Party cohorts, is contained in the article: “Detroit: The Moral of the Story” by Kevin D. Williamson that is posted on the Internet.

Democrats first used brutality and discriminatory laws to stop blacks from voting for Republicans. Democrats now use deception and government handouts to keep blacks from voting for Republicans. In his book, “Dreams From My Father,” Obama described what he and other Democrats do to poor blacks as “plantation politics.”

The racist Democrats of the 1950’s and 1960’s that Republicans were fighting died Democrats. One racist Democrat who survived until 2010 was US Senator Robert Byrd, a former recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan. Notably, the Ku Klux Klan was started by Democrats in 1866 and became the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party for the purpose of terrorizing and lynching Republicans—black and white. Byrd became a prominent leader in the Democrat-controlled Congress where he was honored by his fellow Democrats as the “conscience of the Senate.”

Byrd was a fierce opponent of desegregating the military and complained in one letter: “I would rather die a thousand times and see old glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again than see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen of the wilds.”

Democrats denounced US Senator Trent Lott for his remarks about US Senator Strom Thurmond. However, there was silence when Democrat US Senator Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been “a great senator for any moment.” Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and, after he became a Republican, Thurmond defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. While turning a blind eye to how the Democratic Party embraced Byrd until his death, Democrats regularly lambaste the Republican Party about David Duke, a former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.

Ignored are the facts that the Republican Party never embraced Duke and when he ran for the Republican Party presidential nomination in 1992, Republican Party officials tried to block his participation. Hypocritical is the word for how Democrats also ignore Duke’s long participation in the Democratic Party with no efforts by Democrats to block him. Below is Duke’s political history in Louisiana, which has an open primary system.

Duke ran for Louisiana State Senator as a Democrat in 1975. He ran again for the Louisiana State Senate in 1979 as a Democrat. In 1988, he made a bid for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination. Then, on election day in 1988, he had himself listed on the presidential ballot as an “Independent Populist.” After his unbroken string of losses as a Democrat and an Independent Populist, Duke decided to describe himself as a Republican, then ran the following races where he lost every time: in 1989 he ran for Louisiana State Representative; in 1990, he ran for US Senator; in 1991 he ran for Governor of Louisiana; in 1992 he ran for president; in 1996 he ran for US Senator; and in 1999 he ran for US Representative.

Contrary to popular belief, President Lyndon Johnson did not predict a racist exodus to the Republican Party from the Democratic Party because of Johnson’s support of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Omitted from the Democrats’ rewritten history is what Johnson actually meant by his prediction.

Johnson feared that the racist Democrats would again form a third party, such as the short-lived States Rights Democratic Party. In fact, Alabama’s Democrat Governor George C. Wallace in 1968 started the American Independent Party that attracted other racist candidates, including Democrat Governor Lester Maddox.

Behind closed doors, Johnson said: “These Negroes, they’re getting uppity these days. That’s a problem for us, since they got something now they never had before. The political pull to back up their upityness. Now, we’ve got to do something about this. We’ve got to give them a little something. Just enough to quiet them down, but not enough to make a difference. If we don’t move at all, their allies will line up against us. And there’ll be no way to stop them. It’ll be Reconstruction all over again.”

Little known by many today is the fact that it was Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Johnson, who pushed through the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In fact, Dirksen was instrumental to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964, 1965 and 1968. Dirksen wrote the language for the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing.

Democrats condemn Republican President Richard Nixon for his so-called “Southern Strategy.” These same Democrats expressed no concern when the racially segregated South voted solidly for Democrats for over 100 years, while deriding Republicans because of the thirty-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party.

The “Southern Strategy” that began in the 1970’s was an effort by Nixon to get fair-minded people in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were discriminating against blacks. Georgia did not switch until 2004, and Louisiana was controlled by Democrats until the election of Republican Bobby Jindal, a person of color, as governor in 2007.

As the co-architect of Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”, Pat Buchanan provided a first-hand account of the origin and intent of that strategy in a 2002 article posted on the Internet. Buchanan wrote that Nixon declared that the Republican Party would be built on a foundation of states’ rights, human rights, small government and a strong national defense. Nixon said he would leave it to the Democratic Party to squeeze the last ounce of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice.

The Claremont Institute published an eye-opening article by Gerard Alexander entitled “The Myth of the Racist Republicans”, an analysis of the decades-long shift of the South from the racist Democratic Party to the racially tolerant Republican Party. That article can be found on the Internet.

Another article on this subject by Mr. Alexander is entitled “Conservatism does not equal racism. So why do many liberals assume it does?” and is posted on the Internet.

More details about the history of civil rights can be found in the NBRA Civil Rights Newsletter that can be found on the Internet.
An excellent video about civil rights history entitled “A pebble in Your Shoe: Why I am a Republican” by Dr. James Taylor is posted on YouTube.


Frances Rice is a retired Army Lieutenant Colonel and Chairman of the National Black Republican Association. She may be contacted at: www.NBRA.in

KKK Terrorist Arm of the Democratic Party
By Frances Rice

History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the
Democrat Party. This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in
the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row
Publishers, Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renown liberal historian
who is the DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University.
As a further testament to his impeccable credentials, Professor Foner is
only the second person to serve as president of the three major
professional organizations: the Organization of American Historians,
American Historical Association, and Society of American Historians.
Democrats in the last century did not hide their connections to the Ku
Klux Klan. Georgia-born Democrat Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Grand Dragon
of the Ku Klux Klan wrote on page 21 of the September 1928 edition of
the Klan’s “The Kourier Magazine”: “I have never voted for any man who
was not a regular Democrat. My father … never voted for any man who was
not a Democrat. My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in
reconstruction days…. My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat….
My great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic
party.”

Dr. Foner in his book explores the history of the origins of Ku Klux
Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by
Democrats against Republicans, black and white.

On page 146 of his book, Professor Foner wrote: “Founded in 1866 as a
Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every
Southern state, launching a ‘reign of terror‘ against Republican leaders
black and white.” Page 184 of his book contains the definitive
statements: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the
interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who
desired the restoration of white supremacy. It aimed to destroy the
Republican party’s infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state,
reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial
subordination in every aspect of Southern life.”

Heartbreaking are Professor Foner’s recitations of the horrific acts of
terror inflicted by Democrats on black and white Republicans. Recounted
on pages 184-185 of his book is one such act of terror: “Jack Dupree, a
victim of a particularly brutal murder in Monroe County, Mississippi -
assailants cut his throat and disemboweled him, all within sight of his
wife, who had just given birth to twins - was ‘president of a republican
club‘ and known as a man who ‘would speak his mind.’”

“White gangs roamed New Orleans, intimidating blacks and breaking up
Republican meetings,“ wrote Dr. Foner on page 146 of his book. On page
186, he wrote: “An even more extensive ‘reign of terror’ engulfed
Jackson, a plantation county in Florida’s panhandle. ‘That is where
Satan has his seat,‘ remarked a black clergyman; all told over 150
persons were killed, among them black leaders and Jewish merchant Samuel
Fleischman, resented for his Republican views and for dealing fairly
with black customers.“

Frances Rice is the Chairman of the National Black Republican Association and may be contacted at: http://www.nbra.info/


Care to try again? I will be waiting for your response of hyperbole and rhetoric with no facts. I also doubt you lack the balls to post this info on your own wall, lest you look more like a fool. The golden part is, the notes will show my response and the TRUTH will once again be out there. This is what you call: game, set, match. Buh-bye!!

Some incels #sexist #kinkshaming reddit.com

Re: Reminder: There is no such thing as a feminist woman

image

(Subhumanmanletcel)

Bitches have no value besides being a fuck hole. And they get annoyed when non chads reminds them of it. Female humor is basically whores trying yo one-up other whores with their whoreness

that dude at the bottom desperately trying to salvage womens dignity.

Can't salvage something that doesnt exist. He's trying to salvave his blue pill illusion

(Plan_o-f_Will)

Shit, I can literally feel his world melting in front of him. I felt the same way when I stopped being a bluepilled retard

Thing is, that's supposed to happen when you're a kid or maybe a teen. This dude will never get over it. He's probably in his 30s. Way too invested in the lie.

(Links_Hacks)

White knight cuck's circuitry is frying lmao. 'But...women are kweenz...how could...but...misogyny...'

(bcat124)

the difference is that the 4th panel is chad, and rest are normies/incels .

Every single woman on this earth LOVES to be called nothing but a fuckhole, if you have the right face and height.

And then people ask me why I hate women JFL ur the weirdo for not hating women imo

(HomoheroBishii)

Like a KKK member who only has sex with black people. Literally nobody would question how silly that is. Yet feminists have convinced society that their contradiction is okay because "it's only in the bedroom," even though my KKK example is also only sex related. Humans don't just suddenly turn off their instincts the moment they step outside the bedroom, so feminists basically prove this comic true: https://i.imgur.com/ZuSM1xM.jpg

(lickmytushyhole)

Radfems exist and this behavior is why they shit on libfems. They hate BDSM and anything similar to it.

Radfems and libfems are both retarded

(shadowPerla)

Feminism is a giant shit test and men keep failing it. You have no idea how many feminists are into self degradation and shit. It's all a facade. Deep inside they're just horny cunts with daddy issues, waiting to get put in their place.

(Zurgoide800)

Lol, doesn't surprise me. The feminist I used to talk to, liked getting fucked raw from behind doggystyle, with the intent of getting knocked up, as a form of roleplay. Too bad she was obese, otherwise I would have tapped that. incredibly enough, she could still find guys willing to do that, despite her obesity.

I totally see why youre hateful. That doesnt mean that whatever you argue under such hatefulness is correct.

feminists have daddy issues. every man with a little brain left, knows it. Of course nobody likes to be called a whore in a normal conversation. Do you really need to poin out the obvious? come the fuck on.

(Carkudo)

"This shit" i.e. feminist women admitting that they're sexist and prefer traditional gender roles.

"I try to empathize with you guys, but then you go and post pictures where members of my ideology admit that my ideology is morally bankrupt"

Yeah, if your empathy is predicated on not calling your ideology out on its hypocrisy, you can stick your empathy up your shapely ass because nobody needs a narcissist's "empathy"

Fair point about empathy. I guess that your situation calls for empathy regardless of your personal stance on other issues.

I dont see a connection between havimg a kink and preferring traditional gender roles.. and my ideology doesnt prohibit traditional gender roles.. it just sees them as one option among many.

The fact that the picture angers you and you wish people wouldn't post it means you do see the connection. Good job on showcasing your ideology's hypocrisy once again.

cledun #racist #wingnut gameruprising.to

Currently we are suffering under a brutal regime of Soviet-style Judeo-Negro tyranny.

*If the mob comes for you, the police will stand down, until you start defending yourself, then they will shoot rubber bullets at you.

*If blacks come to destroy everything you've spent your life building for your family, you will be condemned for valuing property more than the right of "people" to steal and destroy it.

*If you are attacked by a black and defend yourself, you will be given 400 years in prison.

*If you call a black man a nigger and he kills you, he will not be charged with anything.

*Black criminals will be allowed to wantonly escape from police, but if you call the police on a black criminal who is menacing you or committing some other act of aggression, you will be charged with thought crimes.

Some other things you can expect to see coming:

*They will take the children of racists and place them under foster care in specifically chosen black homes.

*It will be a hate crime for white women to refuse sex with a black man.

*There will be a social credit system for white people based on how much money they give to black people and causes.

*Every time a black demand is met, they will turn around and call the way it was met racist, and make new demands.

*The tracking/microchip system they implement purportedly to combat COVID will be used to identify and mark racists so that they can be excluded from the right to buy and sell, run for office, or even get a fair redress of grievances before the court.

*Justice will be ad hoc and summary, the courts will be stacked with Jews, Blacks and their soulless white lackeys. If you go into court, the only hope of maybe escaping without being life ruined will be massive bribes.

*I wont be surprised if a jury trial will be declared a relic of white supremacy, and all decisions will be made in a closed court by judges.

*Like accusations of witchcraft in ye olde times, blacks will invent claims of racism specifically in order to have white people they dislike killed. "Racists" will be murdered this way and the murderer will be celebrated as a hero

More than a decade ago I predicted an Islamic uprising to establish a caliphate, a camp of the saints flood into Europe, and an anarchic race war in America by 2025, and it has all come to pass ahead of schedule. I wish I could encounter and gloat to all the ex-friends who accused me of being a gullible bigot who believed everything he read online (very ironic if you think about it). Most of the predictions I make in this post might have seemed extreme not long ago, but save them to a txt file and look them over again in 2030. Hopefully I am way off the mark, but if trends continue....

Galder #racist #conspiracy stormfront.org

Dear Stormfronters,
Long story short : It is the jewish master plan for global / world domination , what stands in the way of jews having total and complete global / world domination ??? Intelligent and educated racially aware whites! Back in the 1990's , when I was a teenager , I bought and read in it's entirety , from cover to cover , the very significant book : "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion". I bought it from National Vanguard Books. It lays it out perfectly the plan of the jews to first : uplift the negroes to make them have equal rights , to then help them out with affirmative action and job quota's , to then use the Zionist Controlled Main-Stream Media , Hollywood , MTV , The American K-12 Public Education School System , The Colleges / Universities , Pop Culture , etc. To accomplish the goal of the jews which is : World / Global Domination.

The goal of the jewish master plan is to have whites and blacks race mix and create a mulatto race is to first : To promote and portray blacks as being : Cool , Sexy , Better Athletes , Better Actors , Better Artists , and last but not least , supposedly better in bed! This is all spelled out and written in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. To all help negroes to mix and mate with whites to create a mongrelized mulatto race , that wipes out the prominent European ( White ) genetics and intelligence , and replaces the mulatto offspring with a low I.Q. , dark skinned , with minds that are hardwired to commit crime , and due to the fact that blacks are unruly , their minds are hardwired to commit crime , they are civilization destroyers!

Thus we have had so far in the year - 1968 : Blacks Rioted across America , when Martin Luther King was assassinated. In 1992 : When the L.A. Riots happened. In 2005 : When Hurricane Katrina happened. There were many other less notable riots that blacks started , engaged in , and blacks used it as an excuse to riot , rob , loot , rape , vandalize and victimize , steal , burglarize , carjackings , and to kill whites out of hundreds of years of historical and systematic racial jealousy , animosity , and also racial rage and hatred towards whites. Lesson to be learned : Separate yourself from blacks and avoid blacks like the plague!

A great example to use , and a great reason to avoid blacks like the plague : Was what happened on October 1 , 1994 in Racine , Wisconsin the very honorable and also very active White Nationalist and Vocalist of Nordic Thunder , "Hammer" Joe Rowan , was gunned down and killed , he was shot in the back by a cowardly negro savage , the negro savage killed him just because he was white! The icing on the cake was due to the fact that Joe Rowan was the Vocalist of a WN Band Nordic Thunder , and he had a juvenile and also adult record of getting into fights with blacks , the negro savage who killed him , "got off the hook" and was just given a slap on the wrist. He basically got off scot free!

The System : Used and gave the excuse that due to Joe Rowan having a juvenile and also adult record of getting into fights with blacks , and also since he was the Vocalist of Nordic Thunder , he was somehow the "instigator" , which was total and utter B.S. He was a victim of T.N.B. = Typical Negro Behavior. What was so sad about his death , was that he left behind a wife and 2 kids who were just toddlers. The injustice of the broken and failed system , caused Joe Rowan's killer , a totally worthless negro savage who has devoted his whole life to crime since he was stealing 10 speed bicycles when he was in elementary school , to get off the hook , and get away with it scot free!

The best racial advice that I was ever given was to : Distance and then separate yourself as much as you can from blacks as soon as you possibly can , stay safe , try your hardest to have as little "social interaction" with blacks on a personal level and also on a professional level as you can. Lesson to be learned : Avoid blacks like the plague! I am forever thankful and appreciative of the great advice , and the "cold hard facts" about race that the owner of Tri-State Terror Records gave me! Whites need to Stay Safe! Wake Up Whitey!

Hate_my_life #racist #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Venting] I resent being black with every inch of my body

Tldr at bottom

Fuck being black.

Am I saying blacks have it the worst? No.

But unless you're a low-inhib:

-Black famous rapper singing degenerate lyrics.
-Black athlete who makes millions
-Black Gigatyrone
-Black thugmaxxed low IQ idiot who's wanted In your country of residence because you're making millions.

Then you're a Failure for a fucking nigger.
That's exacerbated even worse it you're a nigger.
Just look in the news at what every fucking nigger is famous for: Gang related activity, rapping about "fucking bitches and smoking cops" or being a literally Amazing athlete (Kobe, Lebron James etc).

If you're not either of those or VERY GOODLUCKING. BEING BLACK IS A DEATH SENTENCE.

I honestly wish the KKK could take over the fucking world and just wipe every ethnic male out. You'd be doing majority of us a favour. Use the black foids to produce mulato children and over time the blackness will become bleached.

Imagine being a fucking black high inhib, stemcel. You're seen as a failure as a black person. Why can't fucking niggers just focus on fucking school and do non-degenerate related shit.

What Inspired me to make this thread?

Fucking delusion.

For the first time In years a cashier foid didn't look at me in a disgusting manner. She was a borderline landwhale foid, but It actually felt good to be handed the change in my hand instead of it being dropped and the counter and I'm awkwardly glared at whilst I'm picking up.

WHO'S HER BOYFRIEND!?

SOME FUCKING WHITE TWINK. JFL AT THE FACE > HEIGHT DENIERS BECAUSE SHE WAS LITERALLY HANDS ALL OVER HIM AND SHE MOGGED HIM (HAD A NICE FACE NGL).

BLACK FOIDS LITERALLY TREAT ME WORSE THAN any other race of foids (probably on par with noodlewhores).

Because I'm not screaming like a stupid fucking ape, I'm not even seen as black.
Because I keep my trousers at waist level I'm not seen as black.

Am I saying I wouldn't be an Incel? Probably not, but my odds would be 100% better than they are now.

Am I saying my life would be better if I was white? With certainty.

Tldr:

>Black foids treat OP worst out of all races.
>OP wants to be white.
>OP wish all blacks could be wiped out by the KKK.
>OP vents about how if you're not a Gigatyrone or statusmaxxed you're a failure of a black.
>A caucasian male who mogs OP in the face by 1 point (max), but who OP heightmogs and bodymogs had a cute face but fat foid literally making out passionately with him.
>OP angry because the foid didn't treat OP like scum and actually gave the change in his hand so OP thought there was a 0.00001% chance.
>Blackpilled.

Tldr of tldr:
FUCK BEING BLACK. KKK KILL US ALL. FUCK THE WORLD. AHAHDJFJGNROELEMDN

Joe Wong #racist atimes.com

Indian missiles and nuclear bombs will eventually be used in the South Asia, the India peninsula. Because "India" is a western imperialist creation to enslave the Asians against the will of the indigenous people of South, and it is in the form of radical militant Hinduism which is the world's most Degenerated, Duplicitous, and Debauched nation to have ever existed – carnage is happening today in India the likes of which has not been seen in thousands of years. When India and Pakistan were born and in its aftermath 100 million were killed and many more were displaced by the fascist Hindutva fanatics. India is the only caste system nation in the world that abuses human beings by birth, e.g. the higher caste can gang rape lower caste and lynch the victim afterwards as one of the caste privileges.

Half of the “India” is in armed struggles against this fascist regressive caste system Hindutva regime in New Delhi, when the fanatic fascist regressive caste system Hindutva regime in New Delhi lose control of those insurgence, the moron Hindutvaists will use those missiles and nuclear bombs to bomb the insurgents.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesus-is-savior.com

Karl Marx's real Jewish name was Mordecai Levi, write Das Kapital, a book which began movements which resulted in the deaths of more than 150 million innocent non-Jews. David Bronstein (a Jew who lived 3 years in exile from Russia in New York City), returned to Petrograd with millions of Jewish dollars from Jewish banks to fund the Red Revolution there. Mr. Bronstein's preferred name as a revolutionary, if you do not already know, was Leon Trotsky. In fact, most Jews running communism changed their names to keep their Jewishness hidden from the non-Jewish majority.

Hollywood today has changed the names of hundreds of Jewish actors to conceal that Hollywood is owned by Jews, the rotting moral corpse of America, a total cesspool of iniquity. The elite of Hollywood are some sick-minded people, as evidenced by psychopath, Stanley Kubrick's (Jewish) perverted film, Orange Clockwork (featuring sex orgies and rape). Hollywood is much more homosexual than San Francisco.

Waltzroommate #racist reddit.com

One of the things that really drives me crazy is that the left believes that we came to a cultural consensus on their ideas at some point between the civil war and the civil rights movement. I'm not here to try and say that there wasn't some sort of cultural consensus made on race at that time, but rather that it's not what they say it is. When white people agreed to make racism taboo, they didn't mean what anti-whites mean when they say "racism" today. No sensible white person would agree to be what counts as anti-racist today.

When the case was being made for anti-racism on a social and cultural level, nobody was talking about "abolishing whiteness" or becoming minorities in our own countries. Nobody was talking about making room for Islam in our culture or rewriting our history. Nobody was talking about shattering our sense of identity or demonizing us constantly in our own culture. Nobody was talking about censorship or denying science. What white people agreed to was basic shit like not standing on a street corner shouting racial slurs at black people.

When white Americans came to a cultural consensus not to be racist, they came to a cultural consensus against what are mostly cartoonish behaviors. Nobody defends being an evil cop who arrests someone just for being black. Nobody defends refusing to tip a waiter just for being non-white. Nobody defends committing any number of acts of vandalism with swastikas and shit that always find their way onto /r/hatecrimehoaxes. White people agreed to act civilized towards nonwhites and pretty much all of us have kept that agreement, including the alt right. The alt right is many things but we are not uncivil, regardless of anyone's race.

What I want to stress is that the alt right didn't just show up one day and decide to start pissing people off by violating what are essentially non-governmental treaties between different peoples. We are not the ones who decided to change the rules without telling anybody. Anti-whites did that by aggressively redefining the terms by which we structure social conventions, and they did this without asking us if we'd be okay with it. All that we did was notice what was going on and that our society is being subverted, and now we want to talk about it.

It's okay to be what in 2018 is called "racist." It doesn't make you hateful, it doesn't make you a bigot, and it doesn't make you a barbarian. It doesn't make you un-American and it's not at odds with anything in our culture. What is considered "racist" in the current year is just ordinary white people doing ordinary white people things, and it is okay to be white. I think that all of us have a psychological worm where we hear the term "racist" that used to be reserved for absurd and cartoonish behaviors and there's a natural urge to avoid being called that. However, definitions of words change over time and it no longer makes you a bad person. It just makes you a white person.

/pol/ #racist ithacajournal.com

A message sent to Student United Ithaca's Facebook page enclosed a warning.

News articles about the efforts made by the group to diversify the cast of Ithaca High School's spring musical had circulated on the online message board 4chan, the warning said.

The backlash was imminent.

“And immediately after it, on Sunday, it started coming,” said Anabella Mead-VanCort, a senior at Ithaca High School and member of Students United Ithaca, in a phone interview.

The Facebook page received a flood of messages, some threatening the high school students and doxxing their family members.

A photograph circulated online of Mead-VanCort's mother, Eliza VanCort, disclosing her name, address of her place of work and phone number. The address and phone number happened to be wrong.

“Of course, it was quite disturbing to see my information online. Particularly, the fact that people had sought out my address," VanCort said of the practice known as doxxing, or publishing identifying information about a person online. "While posting it, they also mentioned veiled and also not so veiled threats towards me and my family. That said, the worry I have for my children and all of the kids in this movement is of course paramount. They are just young people trying to make a difference.”

Members of Students United Ithaca wrote a series of letters, as well as a list of demands, after a white actress was cast as the musical's lead role of Esmeralda, a Romani gypsy.

The mother of Students United Ithaca member Prachi Ruina received what Prachi identified as "nasty" messages to her mother's work email.

About 40 messages were sent to the group's page and a thousand or so comments were added to their posts.

One message sent to the group's page read: "F*** you and your racist group. U stupid f***ing libtards. Go cry to your mommy and make sure she changes your soiled diapers. Are u all toilet trained yet???? You’re a pathetic racist scum group. Why don’t u all go hold hands together and jump off a bridge. And take obama with you !!!!"

Another read: "If you had any talent you would have been the lead. go back to s***y india and stop crying about whites in this WHITE COUNTRY if u dont like it go live in africa or even better go back to your own s***hole country india."

Another photograph, including African American student Eamon Nunn's picture, suggested "this is why we search for trees.”

“The lynching reference, for me, is very scary," said his mother, Nia Nunn, in a phone interview. "It’s outrageous."

The group's members received direct messages to their personal Facebook accounts.

“We never thought, when we started this, that we would get such backlash from white supremacist neo-nazis," Anabella Mead-VanCort said.

Eric Striker #conspiracy dailystormer.name

Like most of the former Warsaw Pact countries, the Soviets from the 1960s on heavily curbed Jewish influence (whose abuses were the catalyst for the 1956 pogrom that wound up with the Soviets demanding many prominent Communist Party Jews resign) and allowed some degree of national identity in its satellite states like Hungary. The Berlin Wall was a barrier against the 68ers and other sex and globalism-centered Jewish cultural upheavals that were the beginning of the end (?) of the white race in France, West Germany and other Judeo-globalist American client states.

Today, NATO, the European Union and international Jews like George Soros, have spent billions of dollars looking to re-engineer the youth of Hungary by offering hyper-individualism and cushy middle class jobs doing nothing as a stick-and-carrot way to cultivate the nihilism and rootless cosmopolitanism they need in the new elites they are spawning.

Safe to say they haven’t been too successful. While Viktor Orban is heavily demonized by the international Judenpresse for his “controversial” stance on keeping millions of violent blacks and Arabs out of Hungary, he is simply a moderate expression of the will of the Hungarian people.

For this reason, an exogenous antidote is being developed, looking to exploit the age-old conflict between Hungarians and Gypsies (who have failed to integrate into society despite all types of programs inviting them).

The Gypsy and the Jew are natural allies, as both demand to retain their behaviors that they know hurt out-groups, while at the same time expecting their host population to support them. The difference is only in scope (your purse vs your bank).

Low Gypsy intelligence combined with limitless Jewish finances means this is more than a social nuisance; it is a domestic security threat and they proudly admit it.

The Forward:

Although she lives in the undisputed nightlife capital of Central Europe, Andi Angelip knows of only a handful of bars here where she is truly comfortable bringing a date.

Angelip, a 19-year-old student and activist for lesbian and gay rights, said she avoids “rainbow” establishments that cater only to homosexuals. Yet in a country where violent far-right activists regularly intimidate gays and lesbians, she also avoids romantic situations in mainstream clubs.

“It’s not so comfortable to be a minority in a country whose politicians preach for discrimination on a daily basis,” she told JTA last month.

Two years ago, Angelip found at least one place where she does feel comfortable: an avant-garde Jewish community center called Aurora. Since its reopening in 2014 in a poor neighborhood of Budapest, it has become one of the city’s hippest coffee bars – and a major hub for social and opposition activists fighting the policies of Hungary’s right-wing government.

…

Marom, the Jewish association that runs and owns Aurora as part of its outreach mission to young unaffiliated Hungarian Jews, provides office space and facilities to about a dozen non-Jewish activist groups committed to fighting these perceived trends. They include the Roma Press Center, Budapest Pride, the Migszol refugee advocacy group and the Zold Pok agency for social activism.

…

In addition to religious services, Marom also organizes educational activities in schools about the Holocaust, programs for street children, and cultural events like film screenings and experimental music concerts. It also hosts political discussions, such as a sold-out Jan. 30 debate on populism featuring László Majtényi, an outspoken critic of Orban.

…

As Schoenberger talks to a visitor, in an adjacent room three activists from the Roma Press Center hammer out a strategy for covering the landmark trial at the European Court of Human Rights on the role of Hungarian police in allowing hundreds of rioters in 2012 to attack the home of a Roma family in the village of Devecser.

The court’s Feb. 8 ruling against the police – one of hundreds of hate crimes against Roma, or gypsies, recorded annually in Hungary – was hailed by Amnesty International as a “drop of hope in a sea of fear.”

“Not only is the far right party, Jobbik, the third largest in parliament, but the ruling Fidesz party has drifter further and further in its negative attitudes towards Roma,” the group said.

…

The Jewish-Roma partnership at Aurora is unusual in a country where the two minorities rarely act in unison, according to Eszter Hajdu, a Hungarian filmmaker who has studied that relationship.

…

But for Marom, which began in 1998 as an apolitical group, the penchant for opposition activism is inescapable, according to Schoenberger.

This is partly because “most unaffiliated Jews in Hungary seem to be liberal,” he said. But ultimately, “our opposition activism owes to the government’s war on core Jewish values of tikkun olam,” a Jewish concept of “repairing the world” and helping the needy, Schoenberger said.

“We did not choose to become political,” he added. “But when the government is targeting the poor, the different, the foreign – then we have no choice.”

A visit to the website of this “Aurora” Jewish center reveals that this is more than a humble little community outreach group. The space is host to numerous international NGOs, promoting and recruiting for everything from militant homosexuality to organizing Gypsies as a political bloc, similar to how Jews use blacks in America.

Far from an organic outgrowth, the Jews of “Aurora” appear to have friends in high places. Two subtle little indicators on the bottom give a hint as to who is coordinating this subversion:

Listed are the Open Society Foundation, the main (((George Soros))) front group, as well as the United Jewish Appeal (UJA) Federation of New York.

The only reason the Hungarian has to tolerate a hub expressing an explicit interest in overthrowing the democratically elected government of Orban is that they fear international repercussions from these international Jewish benefactors. But all of these fears are irrelevant if they succeed in their task of creating more divisions, more ethnic and social strife, and continue to try and weather the foundations of Hungarian society.

What would the reaction be if Russia were to open up a center full of Kremlin funded NGOs and activist groups with the explicit intent of overthrowing the government of Germany? Of France? Canada? It certainly wouldn’t be tolerance.

Orban’s government is well within its rights in raiding this organization and putting all of the ring leaders in prison. Jewish media libel, EU sanctions and threats from Merkel are meaningless in the era of Trump, who has expressed a friendly attitude towards Orban and the Hungarian people.

If the government doesn’t want to do it themselves, they should simply inform the people of Hungary, and let them picket this institute until these Jews leave the country.

In the end, the lesson stays consistent: wherever Jewish fingers find a social crack, they strike at it until it becomes a crater. Except in Israel.

intelligentsia #racist stormfront.org

Saw this thread on the main page and thought I'd contribute! I was lucky enough to go to an all-white primary school, and the secondary school I went to only had ONE black kid! Doing anything remotely construed as "gay" got you a severe kicking, and immigration was something we never experienced as kids. There was none of this modern BLM, pro-gay, flag-waving BS. Oh to go back...

Even back then, blacks were distrusted and kept at arms length. But people kept their views very quiet, nobody openly criticised uppity blacks or called them out for their bad, entitled attitudes towards life. So, being a bookworm, I read LOADS. I immersed myself into the world of the Ku Klux Klan, civil rights, the notions of white supremacy and the REAL history of slavery. It all helped shape my opinions, I just wish I'd had someone to help guide me in the right direction as a lot of my attitude was initially tentative and slow-forming. But, when I hit the world of work - BAM. I saw it all for myself.

I saw blacks being promoted to senior positions by whites as visible "equality" measures, but the blacks, instead of continuing to promote equality, only promoted more blacks. In my first role as security, I was told that black workers smoking cannabis on the job wasn't illegal, it was just "a black cultural thing" that I "wouldn't understand". Once, a black girl stubbed her lit cigarette out in my face, then I was accused of racism for shoving her away! She fell over due to the force of my push, so I lost my job! The police did nothing when I reported it. Once I went to a restaurant with my girlfriend and two blacks made crude, sexual comments to her, licking their lips like animals. I've never experienced such violent, aggressive or sexual behaviour from whites, ever. Don't even get me started on the middle-Eastern immigrants I started to meet!

I figured enough was enough. Internet research led me to lurk here sporadically, and I've continued reading, learning, and slowly participating in spreading the word and helping others when and where I can!

BMScott #fundie dailykos.com

White-splaining… LMFAO.. SMH.. Sigh.. I am not White. I’m Black.

I’m not White-splaining, because I have no perspective on the White experience; nor care to — I’m speaking as a Black person who has seen racism their entire lives. Do you understand what that’s like?

So to see it here is disturbing…

Maybe you read what I wrote but your own reactionary senses thought “this is a White man” so you immediately assumed I was “White-splaining” or “Man-splaining” .. which just means, you’re not really trying to engage with me in a conversation — but instead tell me why I should shut the fuck up because I’m somehow privileged.

You’re sitting here telling me I have no idea what racism is when I’ve been beaten within an inch of my life by the Cleveland Police Department; when I’ve bad a bottle broke across my face for being a so-called “nigger” at the age of 8 by a bunch of teenage White boys; when I was told I didn’t belong in my neighborhood because I looked like a dope dealer…

Think about your own prejudice to assume SO much about me simply because I said Dear Leader is making racist comments?

Just stop.. and think about what you just said… just slow down for a minute.. damn.


Your response is something of a non sequitur: being a black person who has seen racism his entire life is no more incompatible with white-’splaining than being a woman is incompatible with man-’splaining. White-’splaining is defined by its content, not by the color of the speaker or writer. (Note that I am not commenting either way on the merits of Raucous Indignation’s charge.)
Wow. this is a first on this blog. A black man being accused of whitesplainin. And someone actually defending it as a non sequitur. #arglebargle

Lewis Loflin #racist sullivan-county.com

Critical Theory the Pseudo-Religious Dogma of Progressives.

Oprah will never be held accountable for anything - under critical race theory whites are always racist - even if they don't know it or act it! While Progressives tout so-called "anti-racism" this is really inverse Nazism - singling out the majority for cultural if not racial elimination.

Their tactics are right out of the Nazi playbook where the target group is culturally and socially marginalized - before the full implementation of the final solution. Nazism wasn't worked out in a day, but force fed to an entire generation before it became possible.

Critical theory and it's off shoots was concocted by a collection of self-hating Jewish-Marxist refugees known today as the Frankfurt School. Giving up on discredited economic Marxism, they believed the problem was Western Culture and it had to be destroyed. So they apply Freud with Marxism to culture - shockingly their methods parallel the tactics used against Jews.

Leftists advocate the destruction of white people and even other Jews they disapprove wonder why blacks are attacking Jews in New York and anti-Semitism is so widespread among blacks and Hispanics.

Yet 99 percent of the ADL's rage is focused on white Christians who are among the least anti-Semitic. They always target religion while atheist-Leftism is real problem. They claim it's anti-Semitic to believe Jews hold "too much power", yet these are the facts with Jews as 2 percent of the population:

Three members or one-third of the Supreme (Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan) are Jews along with six Catholics.

The 113th Congress has 12 percent of the Senate and 5 percent of the House are Jews and are often the most leftist members. Source www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

So it's anti-Semitic to quote Jewish sources? While Progressives rail against whites and white culture they sure like to practice it, but are stunned when they are targeted by those they defend and cover up for:

"Many African American/Caribbean residents expressed a genuine concern that as the Jewish community continues to grow, they would be pushed out by their Jewish landlords or by Jewish families looking to purchase homes...I respect and appreciate the Jewish community's family values and unity that has led to strong political, economic and cultural gains.

While I personally regard this level of tenacity, I also recognize that for others, the accomplishments of the Jewish community triggers feelings of resentment, and a sense that Jewish success is not also their success."

These were the words of Laurie Cumbo black New York City council woman. This relates to recent violence in Crown Heights and a violent game blacks use on whites-Asians in general called "knockout." She too will never be held responsible for her racist' views. Under critical theory (she is black) racial minorities can never be racists - they lack political power.

But the story is entirely different for Paula Deen, the Rodeo Clown, or Duck Dynasty. How exactly did Laurie Cumbo get elected to office and be a victim of white power? Progressives are not only liars and racists - they are irrational.

While the New York police are investing some of the attacks as anti-Semitic hate crimes - if the victims were simply non-Jewish whites there would no consideration of hate crime laws. Thus Jewish success is touted as white while as victims they are a special protected group. More double standards.

So I can go on all day with the lies, racism, and contradictions Progressives display - but definitions aside their actions define them. Anything is better than the system that rewards them with wealth and privilege most of us only dream of - and they hate it all.

My definition for Progressives is secular collectivists on the political left. When government practices double-standards and crushes individual liberty this undermines tolerance across the board. Treating people differently because of race is in fact racism and should be resisted.

Nico Dacumos #fundie everydayfeminism.com

The article title is "Should Light-Skinned People of Color Voluntarily Exclude Ourselves from People of Color Spaces?"

Wouldn’t it be amazing if you could get all the cool stuff that Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) get? Like…

Richly artistic cultures that have been setting trends in music, dance, art, and fashion for hundreds of years
Ancient and powerful cultural and spiritual practices passed down through generations
Seasoned food

Without all the problems like…

Disproportionate incarceration and extrajudicial murder
Higher incidence of low self-esteem, depression, and suicide
Decreased life expectancy

There is a way to get lots of the good stuff and avoid lots (but not all) of the bad stuff!

It’s called being light-skinned or white-passing!

Really though. Don’t get mad, my fellow light-skinned and white-passing BIPOC. I’m not saying that we don’t face many of the same problems as other BIPOC. But it’s ridiculous to deny the fact that our experiences are easier than darker-skinned people’s.

There are too many concrete statistics to the contrary.

To be fair, us light-skinned and white-passing people cannot just snap our fingers and nullify colorism. We cannot return our privilege to the Privilege Store.

But, there are some things we can do to address our privilege, like not automatically assuming that we are entitled to be in all BIPOC spaces all the time.
Are Separate Spaces Based on Race Racist?

Dig, if you will, the picture:

A group of gazelles gathers by the watering hole to strategize about how to avoid being eaten by lions. Also just to kick it and admire each other’s stripes and horns.

A group of lions gathers on the plains to strategize about how to catch and eat gazelles more effectively. Also, just to play a round of golf and talk about wealth management.

Lions find out about gazelles gathering together and get very upset, calling the gazelle’s separatist meeting unfair and reverse speciesist. They demand that lions be able to attend gazelle meetings!

After all, aren’t gazelles allowed to attend lion meetings? It’s just a coincidence that gazelles who attend lion meetings sometimes get mauled and eaten.

You think I’m being funny but I’m not.

See, the way that this society is set up, Black, Indigenous and People of Color — especially those who are Black and Brown with darker skin tones — spend an inordinate amount of time trying to avoid the dangers of racism that are instigated by white people.

Meanwhile, the reaction of your typical white person to BIPOC expressing the levels of anxiety and terror they must manage while navigating emotionally, economically and physically violent white supremacist spaces is ¯\_(?)_/¯.

Pop Quiz!

In this context ¯\_(?)_/¯ means:

IDGAF
Hands thrown up incredulously as if to say, “I don’t know understand why you feel that way! I don’t see color!”
“Why couldn’t Kanye just accept that Taylor was the better artist? What’s the problem?”
All of the above.

Answer Key

Why, when BIPOC decide to gather for various reasons in the face of a society that systematically seeks to subjugate them, is it such a problem for white people?

Could it be that white people are afraid of what could happen if BIPOC divested from white institutions and ways of being and sought self-determination and independence instead?

BIPOC throughout history have spent much time and energy building our own spaces only to be met with disapproval, petty meddling, violent threats and horrific violence.

In the face of all this, BIPOC have even taken the time to explain to white people and our own people why it is okay and possibly advantageous to have separate spaces.

Yet we still encounter white people who want to know why it’s okay for BIPOC to gather but not okay for white people to form their own separate groups.

Problem is when white people gather separately we end up with groups like the KKK, Stormfront and the Trump White House (please avoid ‘splaining about how the cabinet is not actually completely white).

Bottom line: When life, wellness, and happiness are at stake, Black, Indigenous and People of Color have a right to gather without white people in order to address issues that are important to them.

Or even just to gather socially without the fear or inconvenience of having to worry about whether white people will insult them or act awkward.

Similarly, darker-skinned BIPOC may also desire spaces where they can process and organize around the unique issues they face because of their closer proximities to Black and Indigenous skin tones and facial features and that us lighter-skinned people do not have to worry about.
I’m Stalling

It’s easy to create a funny and provocative headline before you have to actually write it. Then you talk about it with people and realize that everyone has so many feelings. But feelings are okay, even my own, so let’s keep going.
Psst… I’m Not Making This Issue Up

In some areas, separate spaces are simply not possible because of lack of large populations of BIPOC. So this question is a moot point.

However, I have lived in the San Francisco Bay Area for the last 11 years, a place considered a mecca for social justice activism and vibrant BIPOC culture. I have been a part of many groups and events organized exclusively for BIPOC.

And every time I have been a part of putting together or attended such a gathering, the issue of whether very light-skinned or white-passing BIPOC should attend has come up.

At the very least, people have expressed annoyance that white-passing people seem to feel entitled to BIPOC spaces and/or get upset if someone questions whether they are BIPOC.

While some might argue that such comments are petty or inconsequential, I think it’s worth taking a pause to consider any issues that darker-skinned BIPOC bring up regarding colorism.

Besides, these tensions make sense since they arise out of the reality that colorism has been present since the first times Black and Indigenous women were raped by white men during colonization and slavery and then gave birth to mixed-race children.

To this day, light-skinned and white-passing BIPOC still receive economic and social advantages over their darker brethren despite all the writing, scholarship and discussion around colorism that is out there.

It must be very frustrating to know that someone of the same race as you can enjoy benefits that you cannot access and to know that they never have to worry about things that you worry about every day simply because of the lightness of their skin and facial features that are considered “finer” — AKA more European.

It might also feel startling to walk into a space that was advertised as BIPOC-only and see blond-haired, blue-eyed people who look whiter than the marshmallows in an Ambrosia salad.

Rather than being defensive or complaining about how we are being excluded from spaces, light-skinned and white-passing people might take a moment to think about what the impact of our presence is in the spaces that we inhabit.

Because let’s face it, us light-skinned and white-passing BIPOC — especially those with white parent/s — still get pretty defensive sometimes when BIPOC vent about the racism or poke fun at the cultural habits of white people.

Other BIPOC don’t really deserve to have to deal with our growing pains of sensitivity, defensiveness, and fragility when they were hoping to be in spaces that are safe from racist or colorist microaggressions.
Appearance Vs. Identification

Because identity is considered deeply personal, we are discouraged from questioning another person’s identity.

Being able to determine whether someone appears to be Black, Indigenous or a Person of Color is complicated and contested, and often depends on many different factors and contexts. For example, some BIPOC may only be seen as such when they are with other BIPOC.

But the examples of former NAACP leader Rachel Dolezal and respected Indigenous Studies scholar Andrea Smith, people who were enriched through claiming BIPOC identities even though they may not have any BIPOC ancestry, have highlighted that there might be a problem with uncritically accepting self-identification.

However, we know that one’s race and skin tone determines material factors such as health, income, and life expectancy, so to pretend that how one is perceived by the world at large has no correlation to how one might choose to identify doesn’t make sense either.

If a person has a BIPOC parent or grandparent and looks white, is treated as a white person, and was raised culturally white for most of their life with little exposure to other BIPOC, where does one draw the line?

Part of the problem may be that in the US we tend to talk as if race, ethnicity, and culture are equivalent, rather than related.

For example, a person can have mostly white European ancestry but due to their family immigrating to a Latin American country, may have been raised Latinx and strongly identify with Latinx culture.

Generally, Latinx people in the US are considered BIPOC. So a person with mostly European ancestry could be BIPOC in this instance and may show up to the next Black and Brown kick back wearing hoop earrings and a huipil blouse.

Does this section make you feel uncomfortable? It makes me feel uncomfortable! Maybe that means we are getting somewhere.

Or maybe it just means that this is a fraught subject. No one wants to go around policing membership into BIPOC-ness when it was white supremacy that created these imaginary categories in the first place.
These Final Thoughts Will Probably Not Feel Very Satisfying But They Are Important

Should you exclude yourself from people of color spaces as a light-skinned or white-passing person?

I can’t answer that for you. There may be no answer.

However, problems arise when us light-skinned and white-passing BIPOC fail to ask ourselves this question or freak out when others ask it.

Next time, before entering a BIPOC space, I would like to encourage light-skinned and white-passing people to read this helpful article by transpinay philosopher b. binaohan and consider the following questions:

Why do I want to be a part of these spaces?

Is it solely to be accepted, to be reassured by other BIPOC that I belong?

Is it to build community with the loved ones and inner circles of people who constitute the spaces in which we might have the most impact in our work to change the world?

Is it to hold space and compassion for the anger and resentment that darker-skinned Black and Indigenous people might have as a result of bearing the brunt of white supremacy’s abuses?

Is it to build solidarity with BIPOC communities so that we can fight injustice together?

Is it to move back by not dominating discussions and not rushing to take on leadership roles that could be filled by darker-skinned people?

Is it to humbly ask what we can contribute to the struggle?

Is to strategize around how we can use our perceived proximity to whiteness in order to destabilize white Supremacy?

***

I think you know where I’m going with all this, right? Humility, compassion, and patience are traits all people to strive toward, but it may just be a prerequisite for those of us with more power seeking connection, support, and solidarity from our communities.

Feeling entitled to space and the emotional labor of reassurance or favorable treatment is what often gives us light-skinned and white-passing BIPOC a bad name.

So keep this in mind — it may just be the reason why your people give you side-eye when you walk into a room.

IanJMacDonald #racist stormfront.org

Hollywood promotes race mixing in "Prometheus"

I normally avoid the raw cultural sewage flowing forth from Hollywood, but last night a friend invited me to go see Prometheus. A character named Meredith Vickers is played by Charlize Theron. Vickers is a tall, blond, beautiful, blue-eyed, strong, intelligent woman. She's the no-nonsense chief corporate representative on the starship.

Now meet Janek, Negro captain of the same starship played by Idrissa Akuna "Idris" Elba. He's not even a Denzel Washington-type, speak-English-like-a-white-man Negro. He sounds all ghetto. How the hell did this guy become captain of a starship? Oh yeah, apparently they still have affirmative action in the year 2089.

So at one point the Negro corporate employee makes a pass at Vickers. Does she brush him off? Does she say "It's strictly business here, I'm completely out of your league, drop it now or you will immediately be out of a job and my husband will hang your black ass from the nearest tree as soon as we return to Earth"?

Instead of rejecting his advances, she tells him to meet her in her cabin in ten minutes.

Are you kidding me? Vickers is so far above him in the corporate hierarchy as well as socially and racially, she's the kind of woman who has her pick of men. To her, Janek is just an employee; he's nothing more than the help. But we're supposed to believe that the blond woman secretly pines away for Mandingo.

With her Nordic features and smart uniform, Vickers undoubtedly reminds every Hollywood Jew of of a Nazi. You can just imagine them back in a planning session discussing this scene. "Hey Sid, I got an idea. We'll have the blond shiksa bed down with the schwartzer! Whaddaya think?"

I'm so sick of Hollywood. Once you see the perverted Jewish influence on our culture and politics, you can never unsee it.

Djsjsn #racist voat.co

Soros is Jewish. Epstein is Jewish. Roman Polanski is Jewish. Jimmy Seville is Jewish. Corey Feldman is Jewish. The Hollywood paedophile rings are Jewish. And many many more.

Here's the first Satanic band called Coven.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coven_(band)

They're also the band that started using the devil horn hand gesture.

http://sli.mg/senxlZ

Well guess what, their producer Bill Traut was Jewish, as were at least two of the band members.

Bill Traut Jewish

http://wikivisually.com/lang-de/wiki/Bill_Traut

Guess what else? He wrote songs for them including a 13 min black mass.

"The album concluded with a 13-minute track of chanting and Satanic prayers called "Satanic Mass" (written by their producer, Bill Traut, of Dunwich Productions, and described as "the first Black Mass to be recorded, either in written words or in audio")."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coven_(band)

So now I've just proven that Jews started the Satanic music scene, which isn't surprising considering the fact that Satanic occultists are primarily Jews.

I'm still going to do more research into all this, but I already know what's up. Jews are Satanists. Jews worship the devil. The Torah Jews are the common Jews which listen to the Rabbis that study the Talmud (Rabbinical Judaism) and the top Rabbis are selected to study Khaballism, which is Satanism.

The Torah Jews are puppets to the Talmudists who are puppets to the Khaballists. Jews are Satanic.

I'm not religious, but look what Jesus said, who was a Jew btw.

" You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

http://biblehub.com/john/8-44.htm

Ignoring all this religious stuff, the fact still remains that Jews invented Satanic music and the majority of Satanists are Jews.

Now here's a lead for you guys to investigate. The singer of Coven Jinx Dawson gave an interview where she admits her family is involved in the occult and politics and even names them.

http://popcultureaddict.com/interviews/jinxdawson/

She ultimately says that her Grandfather was a Free Mason and it's common knowledge that Free Masonry is a front for Judaism. I can show you statements made by both Rabbis and Masons where they admit that Free Masonry is based upon Judaism.

Let's take a look at their lyrics now.

" Infants' flesh they did offer For the prince to devour. Covens join, all combine, Powers strong, thoughts align. "

" The cheif of the circle, Known as Malchius drank the blood of a young baby Offered unto him. "

Malchus is a servant to a Jewish high priest.

Ted Gorsline #racist realjewnews.com

I am beginning to wonder if Hollywood and the big Jewish TV networks have not always been simply fifth columnists, Mossad assets really simply planted in America decades ago and supported by Jewish advertisers to undermine American Christian values.

Hollywood gave us all the hand wringing about Jewish/Communist scriptwriters being black listed. Hollywood gave us something like 45 consecutive Holocaust movies all nominated for Academy awards.

Hollywood gave us people like Bernie Cornfield who pimped underage Heidi Fleiss to prominent people just like Jeffrey Epstein did to world leaders to lever them with films. These are classic Mossad Honey traps.

I am beging to think media organizations like CNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, at nauseum have never been anything other than Mossad operatives. They are certainly Israeli assets as journalists like Peter Arnett, Helen Thomas, Jim Clancy, and Diana Magnay ad infinitum have found out.

It may well become necessary to outfit everyone in Jewish-controlled mainstream media with red jumpsuits and send then to Gitmo for interrogation.

The savage and revenge based obsession with getting rid of President Assad, a symbol of defiance to Israel, by people like Christianne Anampour reeks of the same kind of primitive Jewish spirit of revenge that led to Peace activist Herman Hess being held in solitary confinement for life, and then afterwards when he died having the bones in his grave being dug to keep people from laying flowers in his memory.

Jewish controlled MSM’s obsession with killing Assad is as evil a thing as I have ever seen and it is in your face all day long - and its very much a Jewish obsession.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Was Black Live Matters Created by The KKK ??

Think about it; If you TRULY hate black people and wanted to kill hundreds per month without news coverage or blame - THIS is the PERFECT model.
While you are protesting for a one worthless person (a thug) you are stepping over 100's of dead black bodies that will NEVER make the news. The KKK has DREAMED of this for decades.

If you TRULY hate black people and want them dead - you should SUPPORT Black Lives Matters - it is actually a two prong attack on blacks - #1 it allows the SLAUGHTER of blacks with no blame or news coverage #2 it creates a police force that will not want to protect you and would rather sit back and watch rather than get involved - So the outcome will be massive black slaughter with no news or police involvement!!!! The Grand Wizard must receive a report daily with the numbers!!!!


For the record I would like to see black people improve their culture and way of life.

Ricardo Duchesne #racist eurocanadian.ca

On 27 May 2014 the Vancouver City Council voted unanimously to take steps toward yet another official apology for "historical discrimination against people of Chinese descent". The approved motion, which was initiated by Chinese Councillor Raymond Louie, contains a sweeping mandate directing staff to investigate thoroughly, "as long as it takes", every act of discrimination committed against the Chinese from 1886 to 1947.

It also calls for staff to report back to council with recommended actions for compensation and inclusive redress. According to Councillor Kerry Jang, the Chinese who lived in Canada before 1947 "weren't allowed to do very much...to live in certain areas...to go to school or do anything."

What Kerry Jang is saying is a historical fabrication.

The Chinese in BC prospered substantially despite the head tax and not having the right to vote until 1947. In an MA Thesis conducted by Chinese Canadian Paul Richard Yee for the University of British Columbia, 1983, under the title Chinese Business in Vancouver, 1886-1914, it is concluded that the Chinese were able to enjoy "economic opportunities arising inside and outside Chinatown".

Chinese Millionaire Migrants

Daniel Hierbert, a social geographer at UBC, has thus projected that Chinese migration will result in the creation of "a social geography entirely new to Canada". The Chinese, which currently make up about 410,000 of the population in a city of 2.2 million, are set to double to 800,000 by 2031. Hiebert also notes that the city will be increasingly divided into racial enclaves, with white residents becoming a minority group, or only 2 out of 5 residents by 2031.

This massive wave of Chinese colonizers has driven the price of homes way above what middle class Whites can afford, making Vancouver the second least affordable city in the world - behind only Hong Kong.

In Richmond, a city of 200,000 in greater Vancouver, mainland Chinese migration has already helped create the first majority-Chinese city outside Asia, with White citizens cornered into small enclaves and many being forced to sell their homes and move out as "millionaire migrants" take over (read here). It has been estimated that 74 percent of the houses sold for more than $3 million in Vancouver's core Westside neighbourhood in 2010 were sold to Chinese buyers.

Institutional Racism in China

But what is perhaps even more astonishing is that these "millionaire migrants" enjoying apologies from working and middle class Whites come from a culture that, by the standards of British Columbia between 1886 and 1947, are not merely illiberal but vulgarly racist. This has been thoroughly documented in the works of Frank Dikötter. Starting with his book, The Discourse of Race in Modern China (1992), Dikötter examines how traditional Chinese authorities commonly described as "ugly" the "ash white" skin and "indelicate hairiness" of Europeans, and the blacks as "animals, devil-like and horrifying".

More revealing is Dikötter's thesis on how these traditional Chinese notions about inferior "barbarians" intermingled with Nazi forms of "scientific" racism to form a distinctively Chinese racial consciousness in the 20th century and today. The concept of race came to be widely accepted as scientifically proven. Racial theories were disseminated through textbooks, anthropology exhibitions and travel literature, reaching the primary levels of education.

The dominant Han are described as the core of a "yellow race", which includes in its margins all the minority populations. In another book, Imperfect Conceptions: Medical Knowledge, Birth Defects, and Eugenics in China (1998), Dikötter references government publications claiming that eugenics is a vital tool in the enhancement of the "biological fitness" of the nation, heralding the twenty-first century as an era which will be dominated by "biological competition" between the "white race" and the "yellow race". A research team was indeed set up in November 1993 to isolate the quintessentially "Chinese genes" of the genetic code of human DNA.

The visit by Condaleeza Rice to Beijing in 2008 led to a flurry of racist postings on China's websites, with Rice stigmatized as "the ugliest in the world"... "I really can't understand how mankind gave birth to a woman like Rice"... Some directly called Rice a "black ghost", a "black pig"... "a witch"... "rubbish of Humans"... Some lamented: "Americans" IQ is low — how can they make a black bitch Secretary of State"... Others did not forget to stigmatize Rice with animal names: "chimpanzee", "crocodile", "a piece of rotten meat, mouse shit", "[something] dogs will find hard to eat".

Chinese elites have always been very cunning at using their quietness and cautiousness as a rhetorical device to delude Westerners with the quaint notion of Chinese innocence and purity. China is currently building an empire in Africa, based on the exploitation of cheap African labor, poor if any safety standards for workers, construction projects based on the cheapest and shoddiest Chinese materials — all in exchange for vital resources to feed the insatiable desires of 1.4 billion Chinese. That's the strategy: use dirt cheap construction materials to build up good will, then sweep in and take the natural resources. According to Peter Hitchens, Chinese companies have lax safety procedures and "employ African people in slave conditions."

Extermination of Ethnic Minorities in China

China's ethnic composition is almost exclusively Han, 91.9 percent of the population. The ethnic minorities (Mongols, Zhuang, Miao, Hui, Tibetans, and Uighurs) are treated as second class citizens. Tibetans are routinely described as superstitious, lazy, ignorant, and dirty. Tibet is an independent country occupied by Chinese imperialists; Han migration is destroying their heritage; Han companies dominate the main industries; the Chinese get all the best jobs.

The Tibetans are irritated that Chinese migrants eat their dogs (animals believed to be the last reincarnation before humans in Tibetan Buddhism); that the Chinese don't walk clockwise around temples and monasteries, and that they toss away their cigarettes at wooden temples and holy trees. The New York Times described an incidence of one man whose house was burned down for no evident reason as follows: when he tried to seek help, the authorities said, "What race are you? Tibetan? Go ask the Dalai Lama for help."

In 1949, Han Chinese amounted to only 5 percent of Xinjiang's population; today they are up to 41 percent. Urumqi, the capital city, consists of 75 percent Han Chinese, of the 2.5 million inhabitants. The average Chinese views the natives from Xinjiang as backward and as ungrateful for not appreciating the modern infrastructure bestowed upon them by the Han. In the summer of 2009, this region saw violent riots by 2,000 to 3,000 thousand Uighur workers and Xinjiang separatists, in which approximately 150 Han Chinese were killed. The Communist reprisals were swift; up to 50,000 police and security personnel were sent to restore order, more than 2000 Uighurs were detained, and a few dozen were executed. The policy of Sinicization was intensified; in May 2010 Beijing announced a new development strategy to pour $1.5 billion into the region, encourage the migration of more Han Chinese businessmen, together with a 'love the great motherland, build a beautiful homeland' patriotic education campaign that aimed to indoctrinate the Uighurs that "ethnic minorities are inseparable from the Han."

Clearly, it is superbly absurd and cowardly for leaders of European ethnicity in Vancouver to have endorsed a motion calling for more apologies in the context of a reality characterized by mass immigration from a country and an ethnic group that is currently complicit with vulgar and oppressive acts of racism.

CÉCILIA LÉPINE #sexist feministcurrent.com

Cultures that have ‘third genders’ don’t prove transgenderism is either ubiquitous or progressive

When homophobic cultures are embracing transgenderism, we need to question its so-called “progressiveness.”

Last year, Pakistan started issuing passports with a third gender category marked by an “X”. In March, the country took things a step further and passed legislation allowing people to change their sex on legal documents, based on self-identification. Now, people can officially self-identify as male, female, or neither on government-issued ID documents, meaning an individual born male can now be issued a female passport. Al Jazeera reports:

“The law guarantees citizens the right to express their gender as they wish, and to a gender identity that is defined as ‘a person’s innermost and individual sense of self as male, female or a blend of both, or neither; that can correspond or not to the sex assigned at birth.'”

The law has been celebrated by many as a progressive victory. Amnesty International’s Pakistan researcher Rabia Mehmood told Al Jazeera that the implementation of the bill “is crucial to ensure [trans-identified people] can live their lives with dignity and respect.” While this might indeed seem like a step forward to some, an important detail brings up questions: despite Pakistan’s apparent embrace of trans-identified people, homosexuality remains criminalized in the country. What liberals and progressives who support this kind of legislation have failed to ask themselves is why transgender politics are being embraced by conservative and regressive regimes like those in Pakistan and Iran.

Trans activists claim that transgenderism has existed throughout history. To prove that “gender identity” is not a modern invention, they point to non-Western societies where, historically, more than two genders have been culturally accepted. This claim is rarely subjected to critical analysis. A feminist analysis is ignored in favour of a superficial analysis of race and colonialism that goes as follows: if a third gender exists in non-Western, non-white societies, the “sex binary” must be a colonialist Western concept that has been imposed on all of us.

But while a third gender really does exist in some societies, that doesn’t necessarily mean that these non-Western views of sex and gender roles are anti-sexist, nor does it mean the application of this idea to Western societies is automatically progressive.

If you compare India’s transgender population to Pakistan’s, you’ll notice an interesting similarity: an overwhelming majority are males. Hijra, as they are called in India, are men or boys pressured to become women on misogynistic grounds: these males love hanging out with women, help women with domestic work, have features that are considered “feminine,” or are suspected of being homosexual. They are often castrated and aren’t allowed to marry or own property. While they may be called upon to bless newborns and celebrate marriages, society generally shuns them and they are rejected by their ashamed families. Seen as accursed, they are given a ritual, religious purpose to counterbalance their ungodly condition. They often become dancers and prostitutes and, like in Pakistan, have to seek the guardianship of a guru (who essentially functions as their pimp) in order to avoid homelessness.

One Pakistani man named Zara tells The Guardian:

“I was born with a very small male organ. Inside, my feelings are female… I want to live like a woman, cook and do domestic work.”

The implication is that a small penis and a preference for “woman’s work” mean that Zara is not sufficiently masculine, and therefore not male.

A homosexual male born as Iman but calling himself Marie featured in a BBC documentary, Iran’s sex change solution, consulted several psychotherapists, some of whom “worked underground.” One suggested pills (of an unspecified nature), another electric shock treatment. Eventually, one doctor told Iman that he could “change [his] gender” and said he needed to start hormone therapy. After a while, another doctor encouraged him to take a step further and undergo surgery. “The doctor told me that with the surgery he could change the two per cent male features but he said he could not change the 98 per cent female features to be male,” Iman says. It is very probable that the surgery included removal of his genitals. As a boy, Iman was bullied for having soft features and was frequently told he looked “like a girl.” After being pressured to start hormones to emphasize his “feminine” features, Iman noticed that he started to grow breasts and that his body hair was thinning. There is little doubt as to what the doctor referred to when he mentioned his remaining “two per cent male features”… Iman says he felt “damaged,” physically. “What I saw was frightening and abnormal,” he adds.

Iran doesn’t traditionally have any concept of a third gender, but the arguments towards the acceptance of transgenderism are the same as in India or Pakistan: when men don’t conform to gender roles related to masculinity and heterosexuality, they are told they are not men at all. In countries like India or Pakistan, religious beliefs about the “balance” between male and female play a role in how women and men are treated. There are many stories about “hermaphrodites” or tales about eunuchs. Men who fail to conform are told they have a female soul and hold a special spiritual position. But in Iran, the religious explanation is non-existent: instead, men like Iman are told that they need medical treatment.

Those who claim transgenderism is universal will also bring up Indigenous societies to show that “male” and “female” are simply rigid inventions of Western, colonial culture, offering “third genders” and “two spirit” people as proof of this. “Native cultures” are glamourized as gender-fluid utopias that European, Christian, colonial conquest destroyed, imposing a rigid two-gender system instead. It is true that as part of the Christianization and colonization process, missionaries profoundly changed the social dynamics between men and women. Children were uprooted from their cultural and social spheres and sent to residential schools, where they were taught Victorian values and morality regarding men and women’s place in North American societies. Indigenous people were subjected to different social codes than those they’d grown up with. Their appearance, for instance, was refashioned: boys couldn’t have long hair because it was considered feminine — they had to wear suits, while girls needed to keep their hair tied at all times and wear dresses. But it would be false to presume that Indigenous societies — which are not at all homogenous — regarded gender (in its contemporary definition) as an instrument for self-expression. This assumes all of these cultures accepted the liberal notion of individual choice and freedom popularized in the aftermath of the American Revolution. But modern notions of individualism, self-expression, and self-realization were were not likely present in pre-colonial Indigenous societies.

The Navajo, for example, have a traditional third gender class called “nadleeh.” While, today, the term is applied to both trans-identified males and females, it originally referred exclusively to males. According to an essay by Wesley Thomas in the book, Two-Spirit People, “Navajo Cultural Constructions of Gender and Sexuality,” men who showed proclivities for traditionally female activities such as weaving, cooking, and raising children, became nadleeh.

Thomas writes, “From the Navajo view, until the turn of the century, males who demonstrated characteristics of the opposite gender were known to fulfill their roles as nadleeh.” He argues that the Navajo recognized “gender diversity” pre-colonization:

“Multiple genders were part of the norm in the Navajo culture before the 1890s. From the 1890s until the 1930s dramatic changes took place in the lives of Navajos because of exposure to, and constant pressures from, Western culture — not the least of which was the imposition of Christianity…

… Due to the influence of Western culture and Christianity, which attempt to eradicate gender diversity, the pressure still exists.”

However, he also points out that gender roles still existed in Navajo society:

“The traditional social gender system, although based initially on biological sex, divides people into categories based on several criteria: sex-linked occupation, behaviors, and roles. ‘Sex-linked occupation’ refers to expected work specializations associated with being female or male. ‘Sex-linked behaviors’ include body language, speech style and voice pitch, clothing and other adornment, and those aspects of ceremonial activities that are sex-linked (e.g., women wear shawls in dancing and men do not; men use gourd rattles during dances and women do not). Women’s sex-linked activities include those associated with childrearing, cooking and serving meals, making pottery and baskets, and doing or overseeing other work associated with everyday aspects of the domestic sphere. For men, getting wood, preparing cooking fires, building homes, hunting, planting and harvesting various vegetables, and doing or overseeing work associated with the ceremonial aspects of everyday life are appropriate. A nadleeh mixes various aspects of the behaviors, activities, and occupations of both females and males.”

Traditionally, the Navajo believed that the power of creation belonged to women. It is safe to say that they never believed that nadleeh — “feminine males” — were actually women, because they didn’t have the ability to bear children. They were regarded as feminine on the basis of social occupations but were not called women — azdaa — in the Navajo language. Society was organized on the principle of collective work divided by men and women on account of their physiological differences — women’s activities, for example, were based on their reproductive capacity and status as life-givers.

In this case, the concept of nadleeh cannot be understood as “gender identity” or gender/sex dysphoria, as it was related to social occupations and behaviors connected to sex. While the Navajo are one of the most documented Indigenous cultures, many others are not so well-documented and it therefore seems inappropriate to impose modern notions of “gender diversity,” “gender identity,” or, generally, our own concepts of gender, as we understand it today, in Western cultures.

It also is misguided to assume that non-Western, non-white “third genders” necessarily shatter the gender binary. The existence of other “gender” castes shouldn’t be assumed to challenge the “sex/gender binary” — they need to be examined within their own cultural and political contexts, from a feminist perspective.

The fact that those placed in this “third” gender category are usually males raises another red flag. It suggests that, while men can be downgraded to the status of females, women cannot rise up to the status of men. Being associated with femininity is such a disgrace that men are socially emasculated and physically mutilated. This is pure misogyny. The media remain blind to the evidence, claiming to be puzzled that these supposedly “progressive” gender identity politics are being adopted by otherwise conservative societies that are hostile and violent to women and gay people.

In The Guardian, Memphis Barker writes:

“One reason for the growing acceptance of the trans community springs from an unlikely source — Pakistan’s mullahs. The Council of Islamic Ideology, a government body that has deemed nine-year-old girls old enough to marry and approves the right of men to ‘lightly’ beat their wives, has offered some support to trans rights.”

Of course, in reality, this “support” is only for misogyny.

So blinded by our own Western views on transgender politics — certain we are on “the right side of history” — we can’t see how these ideas could be harmful. Our critical minds have been paralyzed, and fear of backlash has caused us to avoid asking questions. Despite what so many would like to believe, transgender ideology, no matter how and where it is promoted, has put women and gay people in danger all around the world.

Andy Ngo #fundie twitter.com

[Note: these are all different posts Andy was making within hours of each other; he links to articles in each]

Right after Donald Trump’s election, the SPLC really stoked panic. A pro-gay Episcopal church in Indiana was vandalized w/“Heil Trump,” a swastika, & an anti-gay slur. Turns out it was the gay organ player who did it. He was only charged w/a misdemeanor.

Days after the Pittsburgh massacre, Trump supporters were blamed for Nazi vandalism at a Brooklyn synagogue & fires in a Jewish community. Turns out the perpetrator was a gay black man who had worked with city council on an initiative to fight hate crimes.

One week before the presidential election, a black church in Mississippi was burned in an arson attack. “Vote Trump” was written on the building. After much panic, an investigation revealed that the man responsible was a church member. Andrew McClinton: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/12/22/miss-black-church-fire-another-highly-publicized-suspected-hate-crime-debunked-police-say/ …

In Nov 2016 a Muslim student at the University of Louisiana said two white racist Trump supporters brutally assaulted her, ripped off her hijab, & robbed her. The story went viral. It was a lie. Media never identified her by name after hoax was revealed.

I remember that Trump & his supporters were blamed for a spate of anti-Semitic, KKK & Nazi graffiti on the campus of Nassau Community College in Long Island in late 2016. The student responsible was Jasskirat Saini: https://abc7ny.com/news/man-charged-after-swastikas-found-at-long-island-college/1666228/ …

In Dec 2016 a Muslim woman said she was attacked by 3 white Trump supporters in NYC on the subway. She said they tried to rip off her hijab. Yasmin Seweid lied. CAIR said Muslims are under tremendous “stress & pressure” resulting in incidents like this.

In Sep. 2018 a black woman in Long Island said Trump supporters confronted her & told her “she didn’t belong here.” Her car tire was slashed the next day & a hateful note was left behind saying “go home.” Adwoa Lewis made up the whole story. https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Woman-Who-Found-Hateful-Note-on-Car-After-Teens-Yelled-Trump-2016-Made-Up-Story-Police-493375511.html …

In Nov 2018 students at Goucher College demanded social justice training & safe spaces after racist, Nazi, & KKK graffiti was found on campus. Someone even wrote the names of black students. Trump was blamed. Fynn Arthur, a black student, was responsible.

Ali Milani, Sean O’Neill. and Noorulann Shahid #racist independent.co.uk

The National Union of Students (NUS) is embroiled in a fresh anti-Semitism row after three candidates holding or running for positions on its executive committee were revealed to have made offensive comments.

In online posts seen by The Independent, one current member of the union’s National Executive Council shared a video mocking Jews as having big noses and being tight with money, while another publicly suggested Jewish people are tight-fisted and said he wanted to destroy Israel.

A third, who is seeking a position on the union’s executive in elections being held this week, wrote an offensive Twitter message referring to Jews and using the phrase “Heil Hitler”.

The Independent can also reveal that, during her time as a student at the University of Birmingham, Malia Bouattia, the current NUS president, was involved in hosting a play called “Seven Jewish Children” that has been widely criticised as anti-Semitic.

Ms Bouattia, who is seeking re-election, was last year accused of “outright racism” by the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee over comments she made relating to Israel. She had claimed the University of Birmingham was a “Zionist outpost” and criticised “Zionist-led media outlets”.

The revelations come amid mounting concern about levels of anti-Semitism on university campuses. A survey by the NUS last month found a quarter of Jewish students in the UK live in fear of an anti-Semitic attack, while two thirds who had been the victim of crime at their place of study said they were targeted because of their faith.

The NUS annual conference, where it will elect its national officers for the coming year, begins in Brighton on Tuesday. Despite the deepening worries about anti-Semitism, a number of candidates seeking office have a history of making anti-Jewish and anti-Israeli comments.

Ali Milani, who is currently a member of the union’s National Executive and is running to be its Vice President for Union Development, was accused of “deeply anti-Semitic” remarks after tweets emerged from 2012 and 2013 in which he said Israel has “no right to exist” and is “a land built on ethnic cleansing and colonialism”.

Mr Milani, who is also president of Brunel University students’ union, also made a comment about Jews and money, tweeting: “Nah u won’t mate, it’ll cost you a pound #Jew”.

Mr Milani also appeared to defend the terrorist group Hamas firing rockets into Israel, writing: “Oh fuck off! Hamas firing into southern Israel was a retaliation!”

And he threatened violence against supporters of Israel, writing: “Just heard someone say ‘Palestine. It’s what they used to call Israel’. Is a punch in the throat justified?”

Another candidate running for a place on the NUS’ National Executive Council, Sean O’Neill, posted on Twitter in 2012 using the hashtags “heilhitler” and “fuckslutskilljews” – apparently in an attempt at humour.

Meanwhile, another current NUS officer, LGBT+ Officer Noorulann Shahid, who uses the pronouns they/them, posted a link on Twitter to a comedy video that includes a number of anti-Semitic tropes and said they had “laughed out loud” at the clip.

The video, titled “Black and Jewish”, is a parody of rapper Wiz Khalifa’s song “Black and Yellow” and makes jokes about Jews having big noses and being stingy. It features two black women dressing up in traditional Jewish attire and singing lyrics including “my ass and nose, they’re both big” and “don’t spend no money but you know I’m rich”. The tweet dates from 2012.

Mr Milani, Mr O Neill and Shahid, who are all part of a left-wing grouping that includes Ms Bouattia, have apologised for their comments.

But Josh Nagli, campaigns director at the Union of Jewish Students, said he was “appalled by these absolutely disgraceful comments, all of which are extremely offensive to Jewish students.”

“The regularity of anti-Semitic comments being made by candidates is exceptionally worrisome and shows complete disregard for the welfare of Jewish students, as well as for the anti-racist, anti-fascist values that NUS and many of these individuals claim to uphold – particularly when those comments invoke the memory of the Holocaust”, he said.

“These candidates should do the right thing now and step down from their elections.

“These comments should not be seen in isolation; they are reflective of a wider culture of wilful tolerance towards anti-Semitism from members of the far left of the student movement that has been present for a number of years.”

“A year on from her election, Jewish students are still waiting for an adequate apology from the current NUS President. From her and from others in the movement, there is complete disdain shown towards anti-Semitism, with many questioning its very existence on campus and in society, undermining Jewish students’ right to define what they deem anti-Semitic.”

Robert T. Lee #fundie tencommandments.org

Just like those who were members of the KKK who were in positions of law enforcement and who worked in the criminal justice system protected other KKK members who were brought before the criminal justice system for committing crimes against blacks, so too, homosexuals who are in those same positions protect their own when they are brought before the criminal justice system for having committed crimes against children and etc..

moviemeister76 #fundie dailykos.com

In this country we are innocent until proven guilty. I’ll wait and see for the facts to come out.

You are literally repeating all the talking points people use to defend rapists. Misogyny and rape culture personified. How utterly predictable from you, though.
Honestly, fuck off. I am not excusing anyone. Innocent until proven guilty is the cornerstone of our country’s legal system.

No. The cornerstone of our country’s legal system was that SOME people were innocent until proven guilty. Our legal system was founded on racism and misogyny, which is why folks like you always fall back on it when you’ve got nothing else to explain away why you defend someone who sexually assaulted a woman.

Alloya #ufo #magick #conspiracy #crackpot alloya.com

Shidhe – Shee Light

You have come from the stars, as Star Seeds. You are integrating this high star frequency into your human energetic body in the here and now, as you are on a mission that is being directed by Gaia, the sentient goddess consciousness of this plane ,the Earth. You have been called into this incarnation not only to experience a human life, but rather to ground and anchor who you on those star planes here into this Earth plane experience. You are experiencing other beings from other dimensions and other star systems and through your communication and commune you are coming to realise they are simply other aspects of yourself. As you integrate each and every one of the energetic signatures, of the various different multidimensional selves that make up your entire identity, you go through a process whereby you drop down through the dimensional frequencies and bring all of yourself here to Earth. As you plug into the organic grid of Gaia, you are downloading your star frequencies directly into her matrix.

Many of you have travelled through the systems of the Pleiades and Sirius to bring yourself here to this Earth plane. You pass through the Gateway of the star of Polaris the North Pole star which allowed you to drop down on a frequency journey through the many spheres of our system, to finally pass through the Gateway of the Black Sun, and manifest yourself here upon the Earth World Tree. The stars in the heavens make up a canopy with the pole star Polaris at its centre. Through this gateway all souls must travel to come to earth. All must pass through the Vault of Heaven to access the many star gates which lay at the feet of a soul as it descends to the earth plane. Birthed through the black womb of the goddess a sun or source in its own right, you were born as a child of Sophia, birthed through the black womb of Gaia.

The Black sun cast a purple light in which the children of the Aurora came to walk the earth. Your energy bodies were not as they are today in your human form for you walked this Earth plane in silvery bodies of Elven light. You will called the Shee, Sidhe The Earth plane was cast in this light from the Black Sun, and no white sun or moon could be seen in our heavens. The entire plane was covered in vegetation that glowed with phosphorus light and the trees lit up from inside. Riding the toroidal ways of consciousness, and manifestation you passed your consciousness through all seven of the wandering stars taking on a rainbow body of light. As you passed through the Stargate, the way of Polaris and began to make your journey here to the Earth you took on dense energetic bodies until you manifested yourself here upon this Earth plane walking in silvery Elven (EL- angelic) bodies of light.

In these silvery bodies of light, you were immortal; no death could be felt or experienced. This was thousands of years before the civilisations you know as Lemuria and Atlantis. From many of you, you have been here since the beginning of the manifestation of this Earth plane, waiting for the arrival of your star selves. When Lucifer fell as a geometric pattern of light, he made his ARC and fell upon the rainbow he caused seven frequencies that we know as the planets of our solar system. to form through which a soul can pass on its way to earth. As a star being you would have passed through the various frequencies of the seven planes of energy taking on shells or ethereal templates which would form your entire form once manifest on the earth.

Once manifest on the Earth you walked in opalescent phosphorus ignited bodies of light, which shimmered with a ghostly silver hue. You and Gaia’s consciousness were one; you were in constant communication and communion with all the various different levels of consciousness that made up Gaia’s entire collective. Over thousands of years you developed a very high level of intelligence and consciousness, and your people spread across the Earth, creating mighty civilisations of high culture. The entire plane was lit up with iridescent phosphorus pearlescent light which could also be seen shining in your energy body.

As this Elven being you existed here upon this higher version of earth until the day of the fall. Some call this place Eden. The place of the EL, the den of the EL, the place where the El of Lucifer/ Sophia embedded and nested their geometric spirals of Fibonacci light into the plane of earth and just like a sperm enters an egg we embedded ourselves into this earth plane. And began to walk in elven immortal bodies of Shee light.

The Shee light can still be seen very faintly glowing in your energy body. For those of you who are Elven Kin, you have an emerald vortex or jewel of energy within your heart centre that radiates this Shee light. Held within this light are the records of all of your life as an Elven being. Held within this she light that is within your heart centre there is a life book was written by the hands of Sophia.

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

30% of men in one particular NY campus are incels

image

(_MiscLegend)
Notice how as they get closer to senior, the percentages drop more when referring to sex. Most (of the ones bound to do it that is) are either having it early (because timeline doesn't matter -- it's all looks/determinism) or rarities later -- or never at all. It's not some "effort to fit in and adapt" mostly -- it's you're either in or you're out (of that social/sexual caste and the benefits with it when you have sexual value and how this impacts social value/etc.)

"It only gets better with age/time, bro."

"College/school is shallow! It gets better later!"

If it (life) "got better after school" then we'd expect there to not be a slowly degrading trend of likelihood of sex (since validation/desire among other benefits are key to life quality). The ones who "never had sex" were probably never going to have done so anyways, in college or after/before/with no attendance/etc. Also notice how these are no tiny numbers: 30% of just one uni is very fucking significant. People used to think incels were only "a tiny minority of thousands on the interwebz" but doesn't seem like it anymore with all of these studies and shit showing how more than 1 in 6 men can very much count as incel, more or less (depending on exact definitions used, AKA just about sex).

What people fail to understand is that it isn't all about sex, but being wanted for sex coincides with a better life quality all around usually (social life; friends; content/feeling validated/wanted; not being depressed/lonely; not being less attractive and a target of lookism; etc.). So while it isn't merely about the sex itself it's the symptom that not being wanted for sex by anyone paints as your value in a social system and thus the other negative factors with it.

IOW: It's all looks pretty much and uncontrollable factors that seal your fate and experiences in life.

(advancedatheist)

What people fail to understand is that it isn't all about sex, but being wanted for sex coincides with a better life quality all around usually

I've been saying this for years. It's funny how the health scolds have a model for the flourishing man that involves diet, exercise, social engagement and so forth; but they treat the incel's sexual eviction as an irrelevancy to his objective well being.

The incel is also at a disadvantage in the work place, because when you have sexual relationships with girls early in life, at an appropriate age, you pick up skills from the experience which don't exist in isolation; these skills play a role in the bigger problem of knowing how to live competently in a world full of women. Women in the work place respect a male coworker more when they can see that a woman in his private life wants to spend time with him and presumably have sex with him.

(QN356bx)
I'd like to see if those happy people would still be happy if nobody was attracted to them. They all say live like me and you too will be happy! I have been eating healthy my entire life and cycle at least half an hour every day. The magic formula just doesn't work. I am attracted to women and wish to have sex with them. It's not like that goes away during the 30 minutes I spent cycling or the hour to prepare good food every day. I'm only free of those feelings when I sleep.

frankenmine #racist reddit.com

[On J.J. Abrams casting a black lead in Star Wars 7]

If the character's already been established (in a book, etc.) then its defining traits must obviously be maintained, as in the case of Hunger Games.

No such situation applies to J.J. Abrams, because he had free rein to create characters from scratch. And yet he chose to create and cast non-white characters (in leading roles) exclusively. This is racism. This is white genocide.

You seem more interested in derailing from J.J. Abrams' racism than condemning it. This makes you just as racist.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Why Mexico is desperate to keep the illegals in America:

Mexico is desperate to keep the illegals in America, because effectively in Mexico, there is a racial caste system based upon skin color.

Mexico has spent the better part of 20 years, radicalizing the dark skinned Mexican's, to get them to illegally move to America. Accusing White American's of racism, for the most trivial of things, while in Mexico, in order to get a job, you have to attach a photo to your resume(to keep the darkies out).

Look at the former Mexican president, and even the current one: They look nothing like the millions of illegal immigrants from Mexico.

Heck, "Carlos Slim", is Lebanese/Semitic origin.

If the illegals are sent back, it means an end to the Mexican caste system. The light skinned Mexican oligarchy, is DESPERATE, to keep that from happening.

We need to expose this angle, and demand an end to Mexico's racist, ethnic caste system. We need to radicalize the dark Mexican's, against the light Mexican's. Remind them how wealthy Mexico is, and how the light skinned Mexican's are actually hoarding all the wealth, not paying their fair share of taxes, and deliberately discriminating against Mexican's that are too dark or Mestizos looking.

It can readily be done. We need to encourage protests at the Mexican embassy's, akin to the protests at the South African embassies in the late 80's, early 90's, to end Apartheid.

The dark skinned Mexican's, must be radicalized. We are at war, with Mexico's light skinned, roman catholic, upper class. We tried peace, but they aim to kill us.

Aeman Ansari #racist huffingtonpost.ca

Last week The Ryersonian reported on an incident that involved two first-year journalism students who were turned away from an event organized by Racialized Students' Collective because they are white. Since then there has been a lot of commentary on the piece and a lot of debate -- a lot of the criticism is valid.

There are two sides to the story: 1) the media has a right to attend public events and report on matters that are in the public interest. The student media needs to cover initiatives that are happening on campus so that we draw attention to them and in turn create awareness (The Ryersonian reported that one student said he was covering the meeting for an assignment). 2) Marginalized groups have a right to claim spaces in the public realm where they can share stories about the discrimination they have faced without judgment and intrusion from anyone else.

I am a person of colour and a journalist and so there are two conflicting voices inside my head. But in this case one voice, that of a person of colour, is louder and my conscience does not allow me to be impartial. I have to take a side.

The organizers of the event, the Racialized Students' Collective, should have done a better job of labelling this event as a safe space on the Ryerson Students' Union online calendar. They should label safe spaces clearly and maybe even host events that educate the public on what they mean. Doing so will help the public and the media have a better understanding of the purpose and value of these spaces.

However, the point to note is not that two white students were asked to leave the event, but rather that this was a safe space and that we as a newsroom, as a campus and as a society are not as knowledgeable as we should be about what these spaces mean.

It's not just important, but it's essential, for marginalized groups to have safe spaces on campus to engage with people who understand what they go through. Though this group is funded by Ryerson's student union, it works to serve a particular group and a particular purpose. Many students at Ryerson have encountered racism in their life that is impossible to forget and many are exposed to discrimination on a daily basis. This group and these sort of events allow people of colour to lay bare their experiences and to collectively combat this societal ailment. These spaces are rare places in the world not controlled by individuals who have power, who have privilege.

These spaces, which are forums where minority groups are protected from mainstream stereotypes and marginalization, are crucial to resistance of oppression and we, as a school and as a society, need to respect them.

Earlier in the week a newsroom colleague and I went to an ad-hoc committee meeting on sexual assault policy. When we arrived we were told it was a safe space, and that we would not be able to report on anything that would be discussed in the meeting.

We understood the value of these sorts of events, where people can share their common struggles. Our understanding let us attend and contribute to the conversation, even if we couldn't report about it.
We understood the people there had a right to privacy. They had a right to collectively work through the challenges society had imposed on them. They had a right to claim parts of the campus, parts of the world, for a few hours in hopes of creating broader social change.

The two students who tried to enter the RSC meeting said that they were embarrassed when they were asked to leave and that the group was being counterproductive in sectioning themselves off. Similarly, some of the comments on the piece written about these students speaks to the idea that excluding certain people from these events, this dialogue, is encouraging racial tension. Their embarrassment isn't as important as the other issues involved here.

Segregation was imposed on people of colour by people of privilege, not the other way around. The very fact that individuals organizing to help each other get through social barriers and injustices are being attacked and questioned for their peaceful assembly is proof that they were right to exclude those students.

Racialized people experience systemic discrimination on a daily basis, on many levels, and in ways that white people may never encounter. The whole point of these safe spaces is to remove that power dynamic. That's partly what makes them spaces for healing.

The presence of any kind of privilege puts unnecessary pressure on the people of colour to defend any anger or frustrations they have, to fear the outcome of sharing their stories. The attendees are trying to move forward by supporting each other and they should not have to defend themselves, they should not fear the consequences of raising their voices.

Instead of focusing on why those students were asked to leave, we should be thinking about the history of oppression that makes these kinds of groups and these kinds of places so very important. We should be focusing on how to be aware and respectful of the rights of both the press and marginalized groups. We have to find a way to coexist peacefully.

The West has a history of oppressing people of colour: from Africans who were enslaved and brought to the New World, to native people whose land was stolen by Europeans. This kind of oppression is still witnessed today, in the way the black community is treated in the United States, in the state of African nations trying to recover from the collapse of the previous colonial rule, and in the continuing struggles of indigenous peoples.

White people may experience occasional and unacceptable prejudice, but not racism. They do not experience the systemic racism that makes it hard for them to find jobs, housing, health care and justice in the legal system.

Racism is not personal, it is structural. Unlike the arena of mainstream media, the educational system, religious institutions and judicial systems that reinforce hurtful stereotypes, these spaces remind the oppressed that they are human, that they deserve respect.

DiggerForTruth #conspiracy #racist #dunning-kruger diggerfortruth.wordpress.com

Digger’s response in bold capitals. Here is a classic example of someone who has been poisoned by the onslaught of jewish mind control. Understandable, but sad ………………

I can’t believe you people are actually buying this crap..
NO YOU HAVE BOUGHT THE JEWISH CRAP, WE ARE THE ONES WILLING TO BE OPEN MINDED AND INDEPENDENT THINKING ENOUGH TO LOOK AT AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE JEWISH BRAINWASHING.
6 million people were killed, A KOSHER LIE/NARRATIVE (FAIRYTALE)

multiple families that were affected by this tragedy can verify this. YOU CAN SPEAK TO HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS,
HA – WOT THE JEWISH LIARS WHO SPEW OUT THIS FABLE(?)

how the fuck can you deny a living testimony? I’m an open minded person who hears everyone one out, but this is fucking backwards and pathetic on your parts for allowing your minds to rot with these rotten ideas of a man who was a coward THAT IS ONE THING HITLER WAS NOT – A COWARD.

He drove the world to misery from behind a desk WRONG! THIS IS YOUR BRAINWASHING FILTERING THROUGH. YOU ARE A REPEATER, SUFFERING FROM THE DISEASE OF REPEATITIS. THIS HERO ACTUALLY FAUGHT IN THE WAR AND WAS INJURED FOR IT. HE CARED PASSIONATE ABOUT HIS PEOPLE, HIS COUNTRY AND ETHICAL VALUES BEING DESTROYED.

and watched others die for his insanity and agenda. You people have no idea about the horrors of the fascist goverment that monster established, LOL you wouldn’t be allowed to even be out here on the web stating your opinions! NONSENSE, IT IS PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO ARE CURBING OUR THOUGHTS. WHY THEN ARE PEOPLE IN JAIL FOR SPEAKING THIS TRUTH. OHH, COME ON ….IT’S SO OBVIOUS. THAT FACT ALONE SHOULD RING ALARM BELLS. IT’S OBVIOUS. THE(YOU) JEWS JUST DON’T WANT THEIR BIG FAT LIE OUT IN THE OPEN. BECAUSE THEN THEIR WHOLE CHARADE AND UBIQUITOUS DECEIT AND EVIL WILL COME CRUMBLING DOWN. THIS NARRATIVE HAS TO BE KEPT ALIVE AS A MIND CONTROL TECHNIQUE, A BUFFER TO CURB PEOPLE’S CRITICISM OF INTERNATIONAL JEWISH CRIMINALITY.

So wake up HA – THAT’S THE KETTLE CALLING THE POT BLACK and realize that you’re in denial and will never in your lives see a time where the world will believe the ridiculous notion that Hitler was a good man, so just drop this crap and start living normally NORMALLY, NORMALLY – OHH DEARRRR ME. LIVE NORMALLY. WELL THAT SAYS IT ALL DOESN’T IT. DO YOU MEAN ‘NORMALLY’ WATCH TV AND BELIVE THE JEWISH MIND CONTROL (AS YOU HAVE), DO YOU MEAN ‘NORMALLY’ WATCH THE HITLER CHANNEL AND BELIEVE THE BS? DO YOU MEAN ‘NORMALLY’ SUPPORT OUR TROOPS TO FIGHT ANOTHER JEWISH WAR? WHAT EXACTLY DO YOU MEAN LIVE NORMALLY???

and accept others. WE CERTAINLY ACCEPT OTHERS, BUT ARE YOU EXPECTING US TO STAND BACK PASSIVELY AND ‘ACCEPT’ THIS 360 DEGREES JEWISH PERFIDY??

Though racism is not fully eradicated we have come a long way, the world has evolved and left you behind. WRONG AGAIN! AND EQUALLY INVERTED THINKING. IT IS YOU WHO IS REGRESSIVE IN YOUR THINKING. IT IS TIME TO GROW UP, BE BRAVE, TAKE A DEEP BREATH AND FACE REALITY. WHY ARE YOU SO SCARED OF THE TRUTH??

I’m hispanic and I have very good friends who are white, black, asian, european, indian, JEWISH, and from many other places and I judge them all off their character not ethnicity or race. OHHH P-L-E-A-S-E; THIS IS PAINFUL AND ALMOST LAUGHABLE. CHARACTER YOU SAY……WELL, FINALLY WE ARE KINDA IN AGREEMENT. YES, YES, YES – THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE DOING. WE ARE HIGHLIGHTING THE JEWISH ELITE CHARACTER. JUST LOOK AT THE JEWISH COLLECTIVE CHARACTER. START TO DO SOME ‘INDEPENDENT’ READING. HAVE A LOOK AT THE SIDE BAR AND YOU MAY JUST WAKE UP TO THE REALITY.

Hitler and you zealots can spew all his bullshit about evolving this and the aryan race that, but a racist mind is an inferior mind. If not for anyone, do yourselves a favor and cleanse your mind of this bullshit because it will get you nowhere in life. NOW I’M ACTUALLY CHUCKLING AWAY AT YOU. GOD BLESS YOU. I DON’T KNOW IF THERE IS ANY HOPE FOR YOU. YOU SOUND TOO FAR GONE. TOO BRAINWASHED BY THE JEWISH MIND CONTROL.
PS: Digger I pity you the most, man. ARRHHH – BLESS YOU.

DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING ~ DO SOME INDEPENDENT READING

Feynman and Coulter's love child #racist 3edgesword.blogspot.com

Nicki Minj's only talent is rectal obesity

Nicki Minaj says that the cultural contributions of black women are often overlooked.

In a series of tweets, Ms. Minaj hinted that “Anaconda” would have been nominated if she had been a different type of woman or “kind” of artist. She also said that black women were rarely given appropriate credit for their cultural contributions.

Hey, Nicki, your sole "contribution" to music is that you have a fat ass. That's it.

Is that "#Anaconda" song by @NICKIMINAJ not the laziest thing ever?
— FACLC (@FACLC) September 18, 2014


Thought experiment: two friends both send you links. One sends you "Two Girls, One Cup". The other sends "Anaconda". Who do you hate more?
— FACLC (@FACLC) September 18, 2014

I stand by my earlier statement. "Anaconda" is the laziest song and video ever. At least when Puff Daddy ripped off Led Zeppelin he tried in the smallest degree to add his own content. It was a least a different song. "Anaconda" is the music equivalent of saying "ditto". Nicki Minaj has no talent. Almost all mainstream black female musicians of the past quarter century have no talent. They haven't made any "cultural contributions". Missy Elliot is a fat girl who loves to suck cock. Nicki Minaj has a giant unattractive ass that only a black man could love. Alicia Keys, despite what her name would imply, doesn't play any instruments (which makes her "Unplugged" album all the more silly). She and Beyonce can sing, and act well enough to pass for the second half of Saturday Night Live. Yay?

Is it too much to ask that "cultural contributions" first come in the form of some sort of musical talent? Cindy Blackman at least can play the drums. All Nicki Minaj can do is play her anus and the giant mounds of fleshy tissue that surround it. Minaj points to all the parodies and memes created by her "Anaconda" video and cover art, but that puts her on the level with the "Leave Britney Alone" queer, not on par with actual cultural contributions from musicians. People still dress to be like Kurt Cobain. Nobody dresses like Nicki Minaj unless they're a stripper about to take their clothes off in public to a Nicki Minaj song.

Not to imply that Miley Cyrus or Taylor Swift are making "cultural contributions" either of course. But then they don't try claiming racism when nobody thinks their shitty albums are the next coming of Jesus.

Hey, do you remember Mary J. Blige? She's sold 50 million albums, received a "Legends Award" at the World Music Awards, and has had eight platinum albums. She is, without a doubt, a dozen times more talented than Nicki Minaj. But what's been her "cultural contributions"? Billboard credits her with the "hip hop and R&B" meshing genre, which is a pretty ugly contribution to make to culture.

In retrospect, Nicki, maybe you should be happy we're just celebrating the number of black guys who want to ass-fuck you rather than trying to shoehorn you into a "cultural contribution". You have your niche, go enjoy it.

Quaid Johnson #moonbat youtube.com

(Submitter's note: find this in a Youtube comment section in a video on a channel I frequently watch and at first I agreed with him but once I began to think about it a bit more and find that it doesn't make much sense and honestly sounds similiar to older soviet propaganda saying anything that isn't pro-communist is fascist. But, moderators? do the quote count if its' from Youtube?)
(massive wall of text in coming!)
Quaid Johnson:
It’s the same exact thing on YouTube, Instagram, etc.

What pisses me off is how Trumptard fascist get to keep their racist, fascist, pro Hitler comments, yet comments calling out their racism and fascism get removed.

I swear these tech companies are run by literal Nazis.

Also I should mention that the education system has been doing this same exact thing for a much longer time and more aggressively than these tech companies.

Like seriously my high school in Texas once blocked A Charlie Brown Christmas and classified it as “porn”, yet actual harassment gets blown away like it’s not important.

I personally blame the fascist corrupt CIA rigged education system for the actions of these tech companies. Schools taught these people to censor like a snowflake ❄️.

I’m getting really sick and tired of our fascist education system spreading far right wing pro war propaganda to students instead of actually showing us the actual truth of what actually happened in world history.

I blame the education system for all of the brainwashed right wingers that exist.

The only reason the that the education system covers MLK is because of profit and is used as a distraction to keep alert students from exposing the propaganda that is being spread by of fascist CIA controlled education system.

The education system is the reason there are so many idiot Trumptards and right wingers in the US.

Seriously, it pisses me off how MLK’s assassination is always said with no remorse.

It’s literally said like this is US history class: “He was assassinated in Memphis by a White Supremacist... ok next guy is US history.”

That is how the US education system describes this to students.

And sadly in 2020 it seems as if the education system’s “New Years Resolution” was to get even more corrupt, biased, fascist, greedy, etc.

I go to a garbage college called Lone Star College Montgomery in North Houston TX.

This past Thursday, January 16, 2020, I got a literal 50 on an assignment in my “Intro to Computers” class all because of my preferred mode of transportation regarding the driver.

It was trusted close friend vs Lyft driver that you don’t even know.

I chose close friend over Lyft driver.

It was a “would you rather...” type of assignments.

Setting:

You are a college student trying to get to class on time.

It’s raining form 8:30am to 2:00pm

I chose friend over unknown Lyft driver

Friend is stuck in heavy traffic while raining.

I still choose friend over Lyft because of obviously reason of trust.

I apparently fail the assignment simply because I did not ditch my friend for a Lyft driver.

This is how a 50 that I cannot recover from at all no matter how hard I try.

We have got to reform the education system so that student can learn the actual truth about world history and actually have a decent understanding on how to survive after high school and college.

#Reformtheeducationsystem

The education system is used by the US government to create more and more fascists.

Here is how they do it:

Step 1: Education system introduces us to the socialism=communism lie.

Step 2: The education system brainwashes students into believing that everything the the US government says is true

Step 3: Republicans say that Democrats are socialist

Step 4: Trump says socialism=communism and says that it’s bad... which recruits more Trumpets and Right Wingers.

Step 5: Repeat the first 4 steps infinitely.

Bernie Sanders is the only candidate that actually wants to truly reform the education system correctly.

#Bernieorbust2020

The education system is who I think is at the most at fault here.

Right now, we have a fascist far right wing education system that profits off of spreading far right wing pro war propaganda to students.

They constantly lie about policies and politics to us.

I’m a current college student attending a pathetic community college called Lone Star College Montgomery.

On Wednesday, November 6, 2019, the librarian basically told us that we can’t have opposing viewpoints on anything.

We are even forced to study people like Ellen, Bezos, and Bill Gates from an elitist point of view. And we have to take pro elected tests about them too.

This logic is taking a toll on our grades. Last week I typed and submitted an essay in English class about how equality and togetherness function in Denmark, Australia, and Finland.

Well... my grade dropped from 70 to 46 in under 12 hours. Then the following morning, my English attempted to say that I never turned the essay in... then she paused and said that I did turned it in... but she won’t except it simply because it’s not 900 words long. It was 488 words long.

On that week’s Friday I was struggling to figure out where the hell to submit my “late” essay in. So I decided to look at the feedback from the previous essay.

She said that I typed a “false essay” simply because it wasn’t 900 words long.

So basically, she was using the length of the essay to hide her bias from us.

Remember that whenever your teachers and professors complain about the essay’s length. They are just using their bias to screw you over.

I did eventually figure out how to submit the 900 word essay... and got a 50 on it.

Btw one thing that me and Greta both have in common in that we both happen to have Aspergers.

As someone who has Aspergers, I can say that people with autism are smarter, more aggressive, have a strong attention to detail, etc.

One thing I have to say is that I’m sick of people thinking that they can harass people simply because they are autistic.

I’m sick and tired of people thinking that they can control people with autism because they have a superior title over us. This is why I’m against power, positions of power, money, etc.

Also, our fascist education system seems to enjoy giving smart people like me with autism the lowest grades on assignments... while the dumbass conservatives and republicans are always getting the higher grades.

We need to fix the education system.

I’m attending a pathetic community college right now called “Lone Star College Montgomery” and I can tell you that both regular school and college are both corrupt.

In college algebra, we have to use this useless thing called ALEKS that we do 100% of our work on. I had to pay $68.19 just so I could continue to do my assignments otherwise I would be dropped from the course.

The worst aspect about it though is my “English” class

For an obvious reason, my “English” professor is constantly spinning the lessons in a way so that it’s basic Republican propaganda.

She constantly spouses Anti Bernie and Anti Obama propaganda to the point that the only way you can escape it is if you drop out... which harms your future.

Here are some of the things she says:

“Free college is a waste of time”

“Happiness is embarrassing”

“Bernie Sanders and Obama bad” (over exaggerated)

“The United States and Mexico live in “harmony”... but it’s not at all the exact same harmony that Denmark has.” 🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️

She even said that Denmark has no interest in combating climate change 🤦🏼‍♂️🖕🏻

And the worst part is that you have to side with the far right wing pro war propaganda in order to pass the class or be successful in life.

🖕🏻Our broken education system

In September 2019 I had to write a “journal” as a quiz over a book I read called “Hygge” that I had to read in the same English class. Here it is:

The first 135 pages of the “Hygge” book basically describes how the culture of Denmark functions and what certain things are called in Danish. There wasn’t really anything in the book that I didn’t already know about Denmark. I learned a lot of information on places like YouTube, Twitter, and Instagram. There will occasionally be a poster, usually people involved in politics or actual politicians, that describe how Denmark and other countries like Denmark have similar priorities that differ significantly from the United States in a good way.

There are several ways that Danish culture differs from American culture. Most of the differences involve the priorities between Denmark’s social democratic government, and the capitalist system of the United States. In Denmark, the price you pay for the taxes may be more expensive than in the United States, but Denmark uses their tax money to help their citizens, unlike the United States.

Denmark’s education system ranks in the top five nations of the world, with Finland’s education system being number one, while the education system of the United States is below 35. This is because Denmark actually teaches proper nonprofit education to their students. However, in the United States has a for profit education system that focuses on teaching ‘education’ to students only for profit, which causes the system to fail in actually teaching students real education.

Turns out that me and Greta, 2 people that have Aspergers, are smarter than a college professor. 😎

I should add that we the people of this world need to unify as human beings.

(some lines later, someone asks for more evidences of his claim; although the guy who ask for it does seem like someone who could appear on this site at somepoint... He calls Greta a "twit"....)

jfuite:
@Quaid Johnson That was not an argument to my points, nor an answer to my questions.

And, by the way, our education system dramatically skews to the left, not the right. Most teachers are lefties and most professors are lefties. That is simply a social fact. I will offer you a reliable social science source upon request.

Quaid Johnson:
jfuite Good lord.

It amazes me how many people cannot see that the education system is fascist and leans to the far right, not the left or neutral.

It just shows how many people have been brainwashed by the system.

Tom Shackleford #racist #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "The Protagonists’ Part"]

While watching the statue of St. Junipero Serra get pulled down to the cheers of a mob in a San Francisco park, the first thing that came to my mind was the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War. From what I’ve observed, everybody in our sphere had similar reactions.

Despicable actions committed nationwide with impunity aren’t a harbinger of smooth sailing ahead. My surmise is that we’re on stage “bad” right about now. “Very bad” and “worse” are yet to come. Most of us have reconciled ourselves to that on an emotional level over the past few years and now we’re starting to see how horror is going to play out in practical terms.

However, there’s an enormous group of people who don’t see things that way. Scientists classify them biologically as White Shitlib Idiots. To these people, the looting and wanton violence are reactions to a racist country which must be reformed. It’s for a just cause so it can’t be condemned.

Weekend social circumstances find me frequently in the company of such individuals. When discussing sensitive matters with them, I never refute their underlying premise because that would shut down the conversation and piss them off. I need these people to like me for various reasons which have to go unexplained.

The Great Cheeto is a bigoted dictator, blacks face systemic racism and police brutality, etc. I give them the impression that I’m on board with all that absurdity. That’s actually not hard to do since everybody around them is like them, so they assume that I am as well, as long as I don’t say the wrong things.

Over drinks, what I debate them on is why they think violence is an acceptable method of addressing social and political disputes. My point is that, historically, once this gets green-lighted, something that the people who initiated the violence will come to deeply regret (if they survive) gets set into motion. Weimar Germany and the aforementioned Spanish Civil War are two of the examples I usually cite.

[...]

I don’t suspect that a civil war is coming. That would require two sides who are allowed to organize in order to engage each other in combat. The only rightwing organizing for violence is done by the FBI for the mentally ill and disabled in order to create narrative headlines. I don’t expect any fight from the Right beyond lone wolves who snap.

But, we now have legitimated violence coming from the Left and a set of stiff penalties applied politically by the legal system against their targets. So, we don’t have anarchy since the police will act against people who attempt to defend themselves or property. However, a more serious societal breakdown which destroys what remains of our country’s 1st world functionality will naturally progress from this point.

In an implosion scenario driven by racial antipathies, White Shitlib Idiots will find themselves subjected to violence that they currently believe is acceptable when directed towards “white supremacists.” It seems pretty likely that many of them are going to find out the hard way that their villain status is determined by skin color, not their moral and sophisticated opinions.

When they’re getting yanked out of their cars to receive mob justice, I hope it flashes across their minds that this was what they supported all along. However, I could hope my life away so I’m trying not to bother.

WarriorClass III #conspiracy wnd.com

Feminism was a construct of the CIA, just like the so-called sexual revolution and the 60's counter-culture and black racism. Just like Balaam taught Balak how to lead Israel to sin and lose God's blessing over them, the CIA created "feminism" the "sexual revolution" and drug use in the USA. God's blessing over this country has now turned to judgement, as the blood moons warn. It was America's moral failure that allowed the success of these psyops of the CIA.

Mike King #fundie tomatobubble.com

The Poofter-Mania at Sulzberger's Sodomite Slimes continues with this breathless announcement of the latest group of "Christians" to capitulate to the ferocious forces of affiliated faggotry. The Presbyterians join the Church of England and the Argentinian Marxist in the Vatican in watering down the moral opposition to the abominable oxymoron known as "same-sex marriage". Get a load of this godless gutless gobbledey-gook from today's story:

"The vote amends the church’s constitution to broaden marriage from being between “a man and a woman” to “two people, traditionally a man and a woman.”

Who writes this stuff? Satan? How long will it be before even that tortured terminology is watered down to something like: "two people, most often, but certainly not always, a man and a woman." Give it a few years!

The most troubling bit of information contained in the piece is the following:

"With many conservative Presbyterians who were active in the church now gone, as well as the larger cultural shift toward acceptance of same-sex marriage, the decisive vote moved quickly toward approval, according to those on both sides of the divide."

There it is! Churches no longer follow the self-evident laws of Nature and Nature's God. From the Pope to the Protestants, many of today's churches are instead following "the larger cultural shift". Whatever happened to following the teachings of Jesus Christ? Remember him? The one that the Christian Churches profess to follow? Jesus (as well as Buddha, Confucius, Mohammad, Lao Tzu, Zoroaster etc) specifically warned followers to not follow "large cultural shifts". Here's a refresher course from the big J.C. himself, as quoted in the Book of Matthew:

“Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it."

What bloody purpose do the Christian churches or any other organized religion serve if they intend to follow "public opinion", as manufactured by Jewish Marxist Hollywood and the Jewish Marxist New York Slimes? The moment churches go down that road, they cease to be Godly entities inspiring virtue; and degenerate into little more than glorified social clubs following "cultural shifts". Heck; the preachers and priests may as well erect wide-screen TV's, order up a bunch of chicken wings, and turn the Sunday mass into a football party. Maybe bring in a bunch of scantily-clad harlots to serve beer and take bets. That ought to boost church attendance, eh Frankie?

Listen up Pope Frankie and Presbyterian Poofters. This is what a true "man of God" sounds like:

"The trend of legalizing 'gay marriage' is a very dangerous sign of the apocalypse.....Lately, we have enormous temptations, when a number of countries opting for sin is approved and justified by the law, and those who, acting in good conscience, are struggling with such laws imposed by a minority, being repressed. Everything must be done to prevent the approval of sin on the spaces of Holy Russia. Otherwise the people are embarking on the path of self-destruction” -Russian Patriarch, Kirill.

Unlike the pusillanimous Presbyterians and the Pontiff of Poofterism, the good Patriarch Kirill will not water down eternal truths in order to please The New York Slimes. Bless you Father!

[...]

image

God's Army is in Russia!

Lawful Evil Award

If you want a picture of André du Pôle's vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.

André du Pôle #elitist #wingnut #psycho #sexist #fundie returnofkings.com

5 Essential Life Lessons From The Hindu Law Code Of Manu

Most ROK readers should find the idea of vocation intuitive. Women have purposes specific to their sex and should not attempt to steal or destroy manly places. However, the caste hierarchy and relative leveling of vocations may seem extraneous to American readers: the US were founded over the idea that neither a centralized Church nor a nobility should exist. Did not the Founding Fathers reject the caste system from the start? Indeed—but I am neither American nor conservative enough to put them on the same footing as sacred texts.

...

A hierarchy where manly men have authority over feminine women works well. Each one has a role fit to its nature and can realize one’s own purposes with the help of the other. An inverted, matriarchal hierarchy where women would rule, on the other hand, is dissatisfying: women would look like caricatures of men by being bossy, let their defects such as conformism and group-thinking tendency express, and turn men into slaves or short-term driven pleasure-seekers. None of the parts would be able to realize its better tendencies, such as loving and caring for women, or meeting with challenges for men.

Likewise, the four-caste hierarchy is the good or fairer one. A society following it and having proper individuals at each level would be the most harmonious one, even in poverty. When the regular order gets messed up, so does the whole society: Kshatriya pretending to spiritual authority start subordinating it to political interests, just as the Protestant princes of Europe did in the sixteenth century; Vaishya pretending to power end up commercializing everything, turning politics into a marketplace where lobbyists and sellouts abound. “Inferior” castes cannot help but bring their essential ethos with them no matter where they go or what they pretend to be.

The lesson, here, could be that modernity has been mostly synonymous with a “vaishya-ization” of society: universities have turned into an academic niche market, politics have become a market as well, and the process have been aggravated by women trying to play men—especially upper bourgeois women pretending to political power. Each “inferior” caste denythe “superior” ones their rights and prerogative have made the world poorer.

As for myself, I have no problem with the idea that some, even men, should not have the right to financial independence: libertarianism may work well among men of Mensa, but a 70-IQ people clearly need some paternalist management not to drown into their own stupidity.

“Even a capable Shudra must not accumulate wealth, for when a Shudra becomes wealthy, he harasses Brahmins.” (10.129) Some wealthy people fund seditious, divisive groups such as BLM, some who enjoy a small authority act like power-tripping small chiefs, some women get beta orbiters and management power… A fair hierarchy is not one with equal chances or opportunities to get promoted, but one where each one can reach his rightful place.
Conclusion

Alt-Right blogger Lawrence Murray contrasted Buddhism, which enjoys some cultural status and association with the upper classes in the West, with an “intensely alien Hinduism.” Practicing yoga, reciting a handful of mantra and mingling with other bourgeois bohemian while sipping fair trade green tea seems indeed easier than vindicating such a frankly non-modern order.

Modernity in general and the so-called American Dream in particular entertain a deep trend of anti-traditional, anti-dharmic thinking which promotes an abstract and formally autonomous individual able to do has he wants. “Gender” or the negation of biological sex in the name of a chosen or psychological sex is but the last product of the trend.

If you could choose between a society where Hillary Clinton had won the election and a society with castes and sacred fires, would you have the guts to choose the second option—knowing that women would be women but also that you may be, say, a Vaishya and thus not entitled to (for example) give a scholarly opinion about what the Bible says?

Whatever your answer, remember that modern ethical theories come and go with the Zeitgeist, whereas dharmic cultures still exist today side by side with modern technology. I could bet anything that in a hundred years the Law Code of Manu will still be studied while Anita Sarkeesian’s name will be forgotten.

diggerfortruth #fundie #conspiracy #racist diggerfortruth.wordpress.com

10 Reasons why Hitler was one of the Good Guys
Initially I had intended creating a piece titled “10 Myths about Hitler” but decided that there were so many, that I switched topic slightly. I understand like most of my work, these areas outlined only give a flavor and are not conclusively resourced. But that’s OK. It’s a carrot and hopefully just enough for people (even skeptics) to do their own research on these controversial areas. When people find things out for themselves, this has much more substance. All these areas are verifiable. They just take a bit of objective, independent research. There are links at the bottom of the page to help one’s research.

1/. He never wanted to kill any Jews Whenever you hear anyone espouse (repeat) the lies about Hitler the nasty Jew-killer. Please always make a point of asking this very simple question: “Where did you get that information from?” Perhaps we all at some point have repeated this fable. Why would we not, when it’s shoved down our throats 24/7, year in year out for decades(?) There hasn’t been a man on this planet who has been demonized as much as Herr Hitler. If Hitler wanted to kill Jews, why oh why throughout all his speeches and manuscripts and his book Mein Kampf did he not mention this? Did he just forget? No, he didn’t say or write it BECAUSE HE HAD NO INTENTION OF KILLING THE JEWS. No matter what amount of destruction he had observed done by the Jews to his people; he had enough self-discipline and ethical code not to take revenge. Being a strong character, he was able to rise above the darkness, the demonic standards of the judaic mindset and show self-restraint and humility. That is why he created ‘containment work camps’ for the Jews and certainly NOT death camps. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

2/. He cared about conditions for the Jews in the work camps Unbeknown to billions of people the Nazi camps were not death camps, nor were they places to carry out human experiments. They were simply containment camps. Something had to be done with these destructive anti-social Jews who were strangling Germany. Thanks to the Jews, Germany had lost it’s moral code and had become debased and de-cultured ….does that ring a bell? Something had to be done! And Hitler did do something – he placed all the Jews in containment camps to allow Germany to breath again. But – this is the key point in this essay/piece. He did it in a way which was ethical. The camps had decent sufficient food (bearing in mind it was war time), they had theaters, swimming pools, football pitches, post offices where inmates could communicate to the outside world, kindergartens, art and music recreation and even prostitutes. Quality sanitation within the camps was paramount and that is why the inmates clothes were regularly de-loused with zyclon B gas. There were no human gas chambers……THAT IS A BIG FAT KOSHER LIE; to which the world has had to endure for over half a century. My theory is that if there had not have been a war effort, Hitler would not have even made the Jews work. AND I bet you the containment camps would have been luxury rehabilitation centers. In order to slowly de-programme the Jews from their mind control cult. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

3/. He had compassion for other sentient beings Many historians claim he was a vegetarian. I believe this is kind of true, he was a pescotarian (he occasionally ate fish); but whether this it is or not, the point is he had a clear connection and affection for his fellow creatures. I’m not suggesting just because he may have been a veggie that therefore he was a good person; but this was a man of compassion and that he recognised the importance of compassion in society. He had so much affection for his German shepherds (picture above with his beloved dog). He banned all animal experimentation, recocnizing it to be evil. Hitler could see the connection between all life forms. It was his level of consciousness. Respect for nature, animals and human life. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

4/. He tried to prevent the destruction of his fellow Europeans Numerous occasions Hitler tried to warn and assist his fellow brethren about the Jewish trap they had fallen for and who really was behind all the warmonger. He dropped fliers from planes trying in vein to prevent Germany and Britain fighting. He initially wanted to make alliances with Britain. Many occasions he gave opportunities to opposing European forces, where he could have slaughtered them. It was his internal spiritual angst for him to be fighting (defending) amongst his European brothers and sisters. He did all he could to avoid war, he was not the warmonger we all have been led to believe. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

5/. He cared passionately about his people and German heritage Hitler observed the degrading machinations of the Jews in Austria and Germany. It not only disgusted and angered him, but saddened him to see how these two nations were being destroyed from the inside out like a cancer – a cancer that his sleepy folksmen could not see. The exact same angst those of us who are Jew-conscious find ourselves in. He was a man who cared about society, a man who cared about culture, who cared about nature, about moral values and about building and improving as opposed to destroying and degrading. He was a man who had fought for his country, in the trenches and been hospitalized for his country. How many of our sell out politicians today can claim that? He was a true spokesman of the people, for the people who had diligently worked his way up from grass roots. From microcosmic pep talks to his fellow workman on building sites, to talks in beer houses, to speeches in basements, to town halls. As well as all the behind-the-scenes work and risks. Slung in jail, mocked and defamed. Endless tireless work to resolve the destruction of his peoples. I would also strongly suggest he cared about all peoples. Yes, including black people, despite the kosher myth he was a supremacist racist. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

6/. He was a humble man, from a humble background Can any of us name one present western politician who can claim that these days? No, today they’re all criminals, fed through the kosher criminal system. All built on materialistic gain and kudos. All content with serving the beast for their demonic and self-serving interests. Their greed and hubris having no boundaries. Hitler worked on building sites as a laborer for crying out loud. How many of these leaches under the guise of politicians do you know have that background? He was also a humble street artist, barely scraping a living together. Some days he had to decide whether to spend his meager earnings on a political book, or to eat – he opted for the former. Now that is passion in politics and a drive for social reform. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

7/. He held correspondence with Mahatma Gandhi This alone doesn’t necessarily suggest he was a good person. But more that Gandhi and Hitler were in alignment on many issues. They both recognized the evil force they were up against and both were coming from a humanitarian position. The bottom line is Gandhi would not have corresponded with a so-called evil mad dictator hell bent on wanting to kill the Jews and rule the world. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

8/. He was a man of God Hitler was NOT an atheist – despite what the Jewish propaganda machine wants us to believe. He often made references to God and spoke in terms of a Divinity. He was somebody who could clearly make the connection between Divine law and Natural laws. He was spiritually and morally driven throughout all his political career. Read his book Mein Kampf to see his consistent reference to Christian values.
tk

Because he was one of the good guys.

9/. He implemented cultural and social reform Throughout Hitler’s political career, his common theme was about ‘cleaning up’. He had seen the filth the Jews had created and desperately wanted Germany to reverse these degrading trends. He banned supermarkets, because he wanted local small businesses to prosper. He banned degrading modern art, as he recognised it for what it was. He banned vivisection (animal experiments), because in his wisdom he could see how futile and unnecessary they were. He encouraged healthy youth activities and social programmes to enhance cultural pride and individual self worth, such as sports and recreational activities. He encouraged men to be men and women to be feminine. He helped develop beauty, cleanliness and pride back into the Germany people. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

10/. He stamped on usury This subject links in most of the points in this list and what Hitler achieved as a leader. But I thought it was essential that this topic was highlighted in isolation, as it was probably the single most important act of bravery and compassion Hitler offered to his people. Unfortunately this act alone was enough to piss off the Jewish IMF and therefore create WW2. Usury is the elite Jews most powerful and demonic weapon amongst their whole armament of destructive weapons. More powerful than their poisons and even their mind control techniques. Because it’s their use of compound interest that enables them to create a stranglehold on every industry and therefore every level of society. Nobody can escape usury – everybody is infected by it. That is why Hitler created his own independent currency as a first move when he came to power. And hey presto – that is why Germany was able to get back on it’s feet and flourish as all nations should. Hitler recognised the judaic invention of usury as unlawful, ungodly and unnatural – and as a talmudic curse which has crippled every host nation the Jews have entered into and ultimately, that which brings about their demise. Hitler freed his people of this curse. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

k k

~~~~~~

In conclusion Hitler was probably the hero of the second world war and the 21st century. A man of ethical courage, a man of spiritual perception and good intent. A spiritual soul who cared – cared about all life forms, all cultures, about goodness and Light and ultimately about Truth. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

Summary

1/. He never wanted to kill any Jews
2/. He cared about conditions for the Jews in the work camps
3/. He had compassion for other sentient beings
4/. He tried to prevent the destruction of his fellow Europeans
5/. He cared passionately about his people and German heritage
6/. He was a humble man, from a humble background
7/. He held correspondence with Mahatma Gandhi
8/. He was a man of God
9/. He implemented cultural and social reform
10/. He stamped on usury

Related info

Video of Gandhi’s correspondence to Hitler http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q49p-mdnX_0

Film on Hitler (which is not told in the Jewish main stream outlets) http://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/

More info on Hitler – I do not agree on the Rence video/interview that Hitler went to Argentina. This is more dis-info/confusion. http://xavianthaze.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/the-unknown-hitler-10-ironic-facts.html kk

Mein Kampf May I suggest when reading it, digest it slowly. It needs concentration and is certainly not a casual weekend read. http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/ k

Deanna Spingola’s amazing comprehensive research Predominantly on WW1 and WW2. Deanna is a historian of Truth. She is passionate about these areas; it really is her forte. We are so grateful for her consistent efforts. http://spingola.com/ k

CODOH http://codoh.com/ kSite exposing the holohoax swindle.

Audio of a debate/discussion with John Friend and Jim Condit on Adolf Hitler http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/4/276/show_4276967.mp3 k

Jusury

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT0grvk16NI&feature=player_embedded http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/michael-hoffmans-online-revisionist.html
“Once again the conspiracy of pitiful, corrupt political creatures and financial magnets made its appearance for whom war is welcome to bolster business. The international Jewish poison of the peoples began to agitate and to corrode healthy minds. Men of letters sent out to portray decent men who desired peace calling them weaklings and traitors to denounce opposition parties as a “fifth column” in order to eliminate internal resistance to their criminal policy of war”
Adolf Hitler
Hitler’s Peace Plans
Compiled by Mark R. Elsis
http://spingola.com/hitlerspeaceplans2.html
Deputy Führer Rudolf Hess
A Courageous Hero For Peace
by Mark R. Elsis
http://RudolfHess.net
Holocaust Revisionism
by Mark R. Elsis
http://HolocaustRevisionism.com

Charcoal #racist nationalreview.com

NR would never tolerate such an article nor muster such defense about Detroit. The bald truth is that Peak Selma was reached in 1965, and in 1968 we began our long descent into Selma Envy, starting with Jesse Jackson being within 10 feet of Martin Luther King when he was shot, wiping King's blood on him, cradling the body in a pieta pose for photographs, and walking around Memphis for three days with King's blood on his shirt.
Like Robert Mugabe and his Zimbabwean Dollar, the fruit of so much hard work and risk became extremely cheap. The Race Card, which contains a Victim Card, has lost its value.
But poor whites were never availed of the Race Card. The last acceptable bigotry in America is against Anglo Saxon Christians. Doubly so if they are male.
And there are no more Selma marches to salve their victimhood at taxpayer expense.
No, white Lubbockites still need 4 or 5 extra points on the ACT and at least a half point on the GPA to get into college. Similar double standards for the job market.
What poor white America is angry about is that all of Hollywood, pop culture, most social media, and all of academe says discrimination is wrong: sometimes, if your skin is the right color.

Gregory Garrett #conspiracy #fundie #wingnut #crackpot amazon.com

The Gnostic Luciferian New Age “Utopia” will be based upon a Mystery Babylon re-visitation of tolerance for all behaviors narcissistically self-indulgent, sexually perverse, psychoactively induced, and sinfully decadent, with self-worship and self-adulation as the highest pinnacle of religious zeal. Additionally, utilizing the trickery and artifice of an Alien Antichrist Messiah Deception, the Luciferian Elite seek to obliterate Christianity and replace it with a Gnostic Pantheistic Cosmogenesis narrative, where Ancient Aliens are our true genetic origins, and Cosmic Evolution, with Mankind in tow, is the Grand Design of the Universe. Becoming ONE with this Luciferian Hive Mind Cosmic Consciousness will be mandatory at some point, whether induced by drugs, neural meshing, trance, military force, MK Ultra trauma-based mind control, brainwashing, demonic and satanic ritual, or a combination all these occult strategies. The underlying theme of this book becomes patently clear as you read it: Against our will and without us knowing it, Mankind has all been indoctrinated into a Gnostic Luciferian Cult through the educational system, modern culture, business, Hollywood films, the media, eastern religions, modern science, digital manipulation and control, propaganda, and of course, through The New Age Movement, itself. It is a chilling conclusion and one well worth considering as the world plunges, headlong, into the Gnostic Luciferian nightmare of self-worship, and a lust for life-extension and unbridled power through merging with machines. Is this not the Pride of Life on steroids?