Similar posts

Anthony #fundie rr-bb.com

[On why Hinduism is a false religion and Christianity is accurate.]

The Gita is just a bunch of babble with no written construction which simply repeats itself so much that it makes you dizzy after reading about four chapters. That's about it. Krishna in Hindu history was shot with an arrow and died. Hindu writings were written, changed, re-written, re-edited, and such into the first or second century.

heretical.com #conspiracy #racist heretical.com

Question: Why do you criticize the Diary?
Answer: Because it is not a diary. It is an unreliable mixture of fact and fantasy which Anneliese Marie Frank wrote for her own amusement. She later described her book as a novel. It was written or re-written between 2 and 26 months after the stated entry dates.

Question: Why had the Franks settled in Holland?
Answer: German measures against Jews became increasingly severe to encourage Jews to leave. The Franks, and many of the Dutch, thought that Holland was safe from invasion because the country had remained neutral during WWI.

Question: Were the Franks wealthy?
Answer: Yes. Otto Frank’s family had owned a bank and the family were used to having servants. This also explains why there are so many photographs: photography at the time was an expensive business, which only the wealthy could afford.

Question: Was their hiding place secret?
Answer: Ostensibly yes, in practice no. There was a long list of people who knew, such as their protectors, their protectors’ associates and their vegetable suppliers. In reality it was an ‘open secret’: it seems that harbouring Jews during the German occupation of Holland was almost the Dutch national hobby. The Franks’ existence was only revealed to the occupying Germans when the tide of opinion changed.

Question: Why did the Frank family never go out?
Answer: They were afraid that the Germans would capture them. However, especially in the later years of the war, many Jews were going around completely normally, having obtained false identity papers. The reason the Franks never went out was because they looked too Jewish.

Question: Who was Kitty?
Answer: In the published Diary, all the entries are addressed to Kitty. In the manuscripts however the “letters” are addressed to various members of her “club,” which consisted of at least eight imaginary people. According to the manuscripts, Kitty had blonde hair and bright blue eyes.

Question: How did Anne Frank die?
Answer: From typhus, in one of the many typhus epidemics which raged through the camps near the end of the war. Anne’s sister Margot suffered the same fate. Their father Otto Frank was admitted to the Auschwitz camp hospital and survived.

Question: How did the group in hiding amass so much food?
Answer: Mainly through Miep Gies, who is described as being “just like a pack mule, she lugs so much.” The eight accumulated so much food that they had more to eat than Dutch people who were not in hiding!

Question: What about the ballpoint pen?
Answer: Some claim that parts of the manuscripts were written in ballpoint pen, and that such pens were not available until after the war. According to H. J. J. Hardy in the Critical Edition (p. 160) however, the only ballpoint pen in the manuscript is annotation: “The only ballpoint writing was found on two loose scraps of paper included among the loose sheets.”

Question: What about the claims that Meyer Levin wrote parts of the Diary?
Answer: This would have been somewhat difficult, since the Levin affair was around 1955 and the first edition of the Anne Frank Diary was published in 1947 (entitled Het Achterhuis: Dagboekbrieven). This persistent myth originates from an erroneous article published twice in The Spotlight.

Question: What about the vacuum cleaner and the supposed need for silence?
Answer: Some critics, notably Faurisson, have pointed to the daily use of a vacuum cleaner and that Anne Frank claimed they had to be silent for fear of discovery. The reality is that Anne was an incorrigible chatterbox and the supposed need for silence was likely to have been a device to try and keep her quiet. Since she could not talk, Anne took to writing instead. Most of what she wrote was not included in the Diary and what was published was very selectively edited.

Question: Why did the group in hiding want more people to come and live with them?
Answer: There are several references to this is the manuscripts, and the answer may be rather a mystery. It is not as if the eight in hiding had plenty of space; the proposal seems to have been to house additional people in the living room. Possibly the best explanation is that of a Jewish characteristic of accumulating in large and dense groups to feel ‘safety in numbers.’ (The word ghetto originally described a Jewish quarter.)

Base12 #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

666, Carbon Atoms, Fingerprints and the Mark of the Beast

Oracle's Cookie posted a fascinating thread on the new movie 'Alien Covenant'…

Thread: Alien Covenant Ridley Scott's new Movie--NEW Update pg.13: Carries Message on DNA and Ark of the Covenant! Video

...and in that thread she posted several images from the film that were quite revealing.

One of them was a droplet of 'Black Goo' on top of a finger, however this was no ordinary finger.

There was a 'Mark' on it...

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/sm/custom/11c37ed50a.jpg

Look carefully. Do you see it?

Now whether the filmmaker has been privy to very advanced Esoteric Knowledge, Top Secret Hybrid Programs or whether there are Familiar Spirits at work here I cannot say.

One thing is for certain... he hit the Bullseye with that one.

This is something I've been warning folks about for many years, and it's now showing up in movies.

Allow me to explain...

It is my opinion that the number 666 in the Bible is referring to the Carbon Atom...

Revelation 13:18
"Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six"

'A Man' being a reference to all of Mankind, not just one person.

Many researchers have long suspected this. After all, we are Carbon Based Lifeforms.

Carbon has:
6 Neutrons
6 Protons
6 Electrons

666

If this sounds too fantastical, just know that the Bible is replete with proof of this claim if One knows where to look.

For example:

In the Book of Ezekiel, God describes Israel as a 'most rebellious house'.

So when Ezekiel needed to prophecy unto them, God had to change Ezekiel's DNA to become like them which in turn gave Ezekiel a *Carbon Mark* on his forehead.

You heard that right... a CARBON 666 MARK on Ezekiel's forehead!

And in order to "Transform" Ezekiel into one of these 'Beasts' God made him swallow a Scroll, in other words, a 'Little Book' of Genetic Sequences (perhaps God's version of Black Goo).

Swallowing the Genetic Sequences altered Ezekiel's DNA, and as a consequence of this transformational process, Ezekiel's forehead turned into a Diamond...

Ezekiel 3:9 (Holman Christian Standard Bible)
"I have made your forehead like a diamond, harder than flint. Don't be afraid of them or discouraged by the look on their faces, even though they are a rebellious house"

What is a Diamond made of?

Carbon...

Another word for Carbon in the Bible is "Ashes".

Ashes are made of Carbon.

Abraham describes himself being made of Dust and Ash...

Genesis 18:27
"And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes"

...as well as Job...

Job 30:19
"He hath cast me into the mire, and I am become like dust and ashes"

Why are souls under the Altar? That's where the Ashes are...

Revelation 6:9
"And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held"

Don't forget "Smoke" is Carbon as well.

What does life exhale? Carbon Dioxide.

Thus when we pray, we exhale Carbon Dioxide creating smoke...

Revelation 8:4
"And the smoke of the incense, which came with the prayers of the saints, ascended up before God out of the angel’s hand"

Smoke coming out of the nostrils could indicate Carbon Dioxide...

Psalms 18:8
"There went up a smoke out of his nostrils, and fire out of his mouth devoured: coals were kindled by it"

Could the Smoke coming out of the Bottomless Pit be Carbon Dioxide breathed out by the creatures being birthed from within it?

Like a baby's first breath...

Revelation 9:2
"And he opened the bottomless pit; and there arose a smoke out of the pit, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened by reason of the smoke of the pit"

What's that Mark on her forehead made of?

Here we see Sin written by Diamond i.e. Carbon...

Jeremiah 17:1
"The sin of Judah is written with a pen of iron, and with the point of a diamond: it is graven upon the table of their heart, and upon the horns of your altars"

Are the Horns of the Altars black with Carbon?

"Dead Man's Blood" may refer to Hydrocarbons i.e. Oil...

Revelation 16:3
"And the second angel poured out his vial upon the sea; and it became as the blood of a dead man: and every living soul died in the sea"

Slime and Pitch (Tar and Asphalt) are Carbon substances...

Exodus 2:3
"And when she could not longer hide him, she took for him an ark of bulrushes, and daubed it with slime and with pitch, and put the child therein; and she laid it in the flags by the river’s brink"

Again, Scripture provides much evidence for the 666/Carbon link.

Thus, Carbon may explain why Hollywood keeps promoting this so called 'Black Goo' that seems to have a sort of Nanobot nature to it powered by Artificial Intelligence.

This Black Goo is often associated with DNA manipulation, ie... Transhumanism.

Scientists are now working on CRISPR Editing Systems that works in a similar fashion to this Black Goo which enables just about anyone, including children, to alter DNA and create their very own Life Forms.

Here is the problem...

We are all born with a unique identifier... a 'Mark of the Beast' so to speak.

This Mark is what we call Fingerprints or Palmprints and in some cases, Facial Recognition Features.

This is why Police take Fingerprints and mugshots of criminals. They identify us.

Mark in the Right Hand = Finger/Palm Prints
Mark in the Forehead = Facial Recognition/Iris Scan

No two prints are the same.

Once One modifies their DNA however, at the very least, their Fingerprints will change.

Did you catch that?

Once One modifies their DNA, their Fingerprints will change.

Meditate on that thought for a moment. Let it really sink in as to how profound this Revelation Truly is.

Now look at that Image again...

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/sm/custom/b0e8dc0bd6.jpg

The Mark of the Beast will be none other than a new set of Fingerprints and Facial Recognition Features caused by a Transhumanist agenda that will transfer ownership of a Soul to a Corporation away from God...

God's 'Book' (DNA) will be re-written and Man will become a slave forever...

DNA will become the new currency in the Cashless Society.

666 and the Love of Money...

1 Kings 10:14
"Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold"

If you know anyone who is currently undergoing DNA augmentation, or is about to... tell them to make a copy of their own fingerprints and compare them as their DNA changes.

Now is the time to begin paying attention to this by keeping a close eye on the progress of these unsuspecting Fig Tree harbingers.

Their leaves are about to bloom...

Mark 13:28
"Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When her branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is near"

Lee Ingram #conspiracy facebook.com

[Responding to a TV documentary saying that Robin Hood never existed]

I sent a complaint and got the usual spurious answer.

They don’t call it a program for nothing do they, as they are programming our children’s minds with a re-written and air brushed English history.

Can you imagine CITV air-brushing folklore heroes from Indian, Scottish, Polish, Irish and Pakistani history? No of course not as this insult of re-writing and airbrushing history to commit cultural cleansing as part of genocide is only aimed at the English.

I will complain again... join me by sending a message to viewerservices@itv.com

My message goes like this...

Email Title: CITV Prove It! Series 2 - Test The Truth “Some people say that Robin Hood was a real man...”

How dare you put on trial an English folklore hero? Can I imagine CITV air-brushing folklore heroes from Indian, Scottish, Polish, Irish and Pakistani history? No of course not as this insult of re-writing and airbrushing history to commit cultural cleansing as part of genocide is only aimed at the English.

You know exactly what you are doing and so do the English public and we will not put up with this sick brainwashing cleansing of our children.

I demand an apology and the program being deleted from existence.

Martin Kohl #racist newulmnordic.wordpress.com

[From "Our Friend, Jim Crow"]

They say that, “History is written by the victors,” and there is no clearer case for that view than the current belief about Jim Crow laws, the Jim Crow era, and what were then known as restrictive covenants. The history of America, my history, has been re-written and falsified to please those who worship in the temple of multiculturalism.

In contemporary America, Jim Crow is seen as a product of hate, of racism, and of blind bigotry. But being a member of the last generation of “boomers” to have benefited from Jim Crow, I have a very different take on the “official” history of segregation and restrictive covenants. Yes, I benefited from Jim Crow, as did most of my race and my community. Jim Crow laws kept us safe, by keeping the nefarious Negro in his place and on his own side of town; the Negro part of town.

XMjLkXj First, let’s start with the history, the real history of Jim Crow segregation.

Both before and after the civil war, our ancestors realized that they had a problem: a Negro problem. The Negro, with few exceptions, did not possess the IQ and necessary temperament to be civilized and brought into the fold of White, Western European civilization. Various plans were discussed to repatriate the Negro back to his ancestral home in Africa. However, the cost, both in terms of money and political capital, was too high for such a venture, so the Negro was never “shipped back to Africa.” In light of these realities that our ancestors faced, there was really only one appropriate course of action; given the circumstances of post-reconstruction America.

The only viable course of action, that would protect the majority white population was legal and social segregation: i.e. Jim Crow laws. There was simply no other choice with so many Negroes in America and the well-documented Negro propensity to violence and crime, especially the rape of white women.

JimCrow_ColoredWaitngRoom_Sign_Canon-resize-1200x0-70

When I was a young boy, the “colored only” and “white only” signs were already being taken down in my hometown. However, my step-father’s family lived in the mountains of East Tennessee, and I vividly remember a sign when we visited there in 1968 that said, “Whites Only! Coloreds Not Welcome!”

I remember that sign. But in my hometown, by 1968 the Jim Crow signs had all been taken down thanks to President Johnson’s Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Federal troops with armored units enforcing that law from the barrel of a gun.

So why do I call Jim Crow laws, “our friend?”

Although the signs were being taken down when I was a kid, the police and those in authority still enforced the “spirit” of Jim Crow, if the not the actual segregation laws itself.

How did the police do this?

When I was a kid, whenever the police saw a car full of Negroes in OUR neighborhood at night, they were pulled over and questioned. If the Negroes had no good reason for being in OUR neighborhood, or had criminal convictions, or gave the cops any problem, they were pulled out the car and beaten with batons, “blackjacks” (leather saps with lead centers, designed for beating suspects) or even pistol-whipped with their service revolvers. (Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolvers at the time.)

Alabama Protest Against Desegregation

So how did this make OUR neighborhoods safe?

Well, the Negro who received a good beating from the police (OUR police, a 99% white police force ) for being in the wrong neighborhood, OUR neighborhood, a white neighborhood, soon learned that he and his “homies” could not just drive into a white neighborhood looking for white victims to rob, rape, and murder. The police in my hometown even in the late 1960s, still enforced an “unofficial Jim Crow” which had the effect of sending an unmistakable message to Negro community on the other side of town. (A side of town, that we NEVER ventured into; it was way too dangerous.)

With each traffic stop, with every questioning of Negroes, the police in OUR town sent the message, “We are watching. Stay on your side of town. If we catch you in a white neighborhood, you will go to the hospital and then to jail. We will use lethal force to protect white neighborhoods. You are not welcome here. Stay away from white people.”

Yes, our friend, Jim Crow, kept our communities safe in the face of the Negro menace and his ability to move from community to community. Jim Crow segregation was the only answer because it was not feasible to deport the Negro en masse back to Africa. Sadly, with non-stop lawsuits against police departments by the justice department and all the diversity pimps like the ADL and SPLC, even the “spirit” of Jim Crow is no longer enforced. Which is why you cannot walk the streets at night: the nefarious Negro has chewed through his leash and threatens the civilization that took him into its bosom. Only a restoration of Jim Crow laws, or the deportation of the Negro en masse back to Africa will make us safe again.

afchief #fundie christiannews.net

Homosexuality is a bondage!!! In fact, I believe there are demons behind it. It is a sin that will eventually lead people to hell if they continue to practice this lifestyle.

Also, I have been saying this for awhile.....The “Supreme” Court does not make laws, it simply offers opinions on whether or not a “law” meets Constitutional muster. If the law violates the Constitution, then the law is remanded back to the Legislative branch so that the law can be re-written to fall in line with the Constitution. This is how our government is supposed to create laws.

Bear in mind that offering an “opinion” does not change the law. They just tell us that it does and we believe their lies. We then repeat their lies and teach them to others. The lies soon become “truth”, although it is not The Truth. I’ll say it again. Courts do not make laws.

Only the legislative branch (congress) can make or change laws. NOT the SCOTUS.

Shittin' Niglets #racist niggermania.net

The real question is..

Were these worthless, screechingly LOUD niggers different, read: quiet(er) at a different point in history? I spent the 20th century nigger FREE. I am now in process of making it this way again, after spending the last 10-12 years in a fuxated part of the country, so I have no real knowledge of the nigger, pre-2006.

It seems with this Obama Yo Mama fuck setting these grease apes amok in this great country, coupled with the endless liberal worship/coddling of these vile things, they only really came to existence in the past 15 years.

Now, they are EVERYWHERE, and LOUD. Were they always this way? Or was it the sail foam, looksutme, shit cRap, "urban" worship, constantly represented in media, constantly celebrated "cultcha" disgusting social media satanism/human genocide which is destroying the fabric of society in the name of "diversity" which caused this shit? I mean, history is being re-written daily by the constant oversaturation of liberal/leftist media.

I constantly see pretty white teens hand in hand with greasy shit apes with cheetos hair and that STINK. I see soccer moms blasting obscene FILTH cRap from their minivans. I'm forced to go to meetings about how we cannot discipline (or even say a WORD) to some nigger who won't stand for the flag pledge, much less even discipline them for anything in life, especially me (because I'm an evil WHITE guy), including the NOISE. I exist in some kind of opposite world of everything I've ever known in life. Being quiet, intelligent, successful, clean and cultured is bad.

Flag pledge is bad. America is bad. Europe is bad. Having interest in my Russian heritage is bad. Being Christian is bad.. Being white is completely BAD, being male is bad, being straight is bad. (I am not shaming any orientations, just saying, it's bad, because... everything I am, in the year 2017 in America...is bad.

And THEY will never fuckin' stop SCREAMING. But if we ever say one word... we lose our jobs, lose our everything. God help us.

Rev. Austin Miles #fundie renewamerica.com

Under Obama's direction, America is beginning to look like a freak show. Watch videos of any "Gay Pride LGBT Parade" and you will see what we mean. Take a look around the streets, in newspaper reports and countless images on TV attempting to make gender bending acceptable, even desirable.

An example is a new commercial showing a personable "waitress" all primed up but speaking with a man's voice like this is perfectly normal. Transgender individuals are multiplying along with the demand to be accepted. They say, "We're just like you." NO THEY ARE NOT.

The Obama Administration has long worked to blur the lines of gender distinction, to tear down morality, which is the strength of a people, and is instead, hell-bent on destroying the traditional family.

Businesses owners can now be fined and jailed for refusing to make a cake or t-shirt with a homosexual message and that includes ministers who refuse to officiate at a wedding consisting of couples of the same sex, even though the Bible states clearly that homosexuality is a sin. But then again, Hellary has publicly stated that the Bible must be re-written regarding those topics for the good (comfort) of society.

Army chaplains are discharged from military service for mentioning the name of Jesus at a chapel service or funeral and for not catering to or promoting sodomites. This is by Obama's order.

The illegal in the White House did state, before his occupation of The Oval Office, that he would change America. He has certainly accomplished that. America is unrecognizable today.

Not only that, he has aggressively insisted that the world share and support his sexual obsession to the point of ordering U.S. Embassies throughout the world to fly the rainbow flag over each one. He has even demanded that uniformed military parades include carrying a rainbow flag. What's more, soldiers have been required to salute that flag of perversion.

And who can forget that military madness in which soldiers in a parade were ORDERED to wear red high heels with their uniforms. What a ridiculous image of The United States Army, thanks to Obama.

[...]

This fraud in the White House says we must be accepting of all, no matter how loathsome they are or what disgusting habits they exhibit. The Girl Scouts of America GSA now allows lesbians to become members and leaders as well as engaging in a disturbing partnership with Planned Parenthood.

So what is the purpose of allowing your children to be members of organizations that will simply teach them to be accepting of all the world's weirdness and perversions instead of raising clean-cut kids with high standards? But it gets worse. Now they allow Planned Parenthood to teach them about how to murder, which is called abortion, as a means of birth control.

What value is it to enroll your kids in these organizations that simply mirror what is now considered normal on the streets and to encourage it? This is what Jesus meant about 'being in this world but not a part of it.' (derived from John 15:19, John 17:14-16.)

[...]

Today the House voted to ban these barbaric late-term abortions. It is now up to the Senate. However, Obama, the most pro-abortion "president" in the history of America, has stated that if that bill passes, he will immediately veto it. This is the personification of evil.

The sub-human creature called Obama, can rightfully be identified as a charismatic monster that rose straight from the pits of hell. From hell did he come and to hell shall he return.

And the sooner the better.

CausticDreamer #fundie reddit.com

I saw the commercialization of Humanitarian values by the Progressive Left.
There's a moment of realization, when it just 'clicks' that these people don't actually care about anybody else but themselves. They don't value human life. I've seen Feminists talk about neglecting their sons to "suppress their violent tendencies," and Black Lives Matter activists screaming about how they want cops to die. None of this has ever been about helping people- Progressives want the legally sanctioned murder and theft of Western Civilization to non-Whites. I see mothers abandoning their children, their marriages, for drugs and sex. Hell, my own mother took part in this. I've seen my mother 4 times in almost 10 years. She has adopted two new children from a more wealthy, and more young man. She wasn't searching for financial and sexual liberation- she wanted freedom from parenthood and responsibility until she could find a situation where the luxuries
erased the struggles.

I saw the targeted propaganda and social engineering, which was designed to make Whites hate themselves and denounce their culture.

Between Google being exceedingly creepy in its suppression of exposure to white males and white women, an education system that strips all intellectual discovery and cultural pride from whites and attributes it to blacks, Affirmative action to coerce corporations to exclude white males in virtue of "diversity", the labeling of "It's okay to be White" as a supremacy statement, etc..... Between BLM marching through cities and tearing them apart in their eager hunt for whites to brutalize in their own "Night of Broken Glass" and the emasculation and romanticism of psychological disease in white culture.... Between the revisionist agenda of film, in which Victorian Europe is re-written to have Blacks as the higher status individuals of European society with no Whites to act as their class peers.... There's a clear agenda. I refuse to take the hemlock past my lips.

I knew that I'd die before I let my blood, my name, and my culture be taken from me. If we're to be hunted down and killed like cattle, they'll be met with so much devastation that they won't be able to revise history to cover it up.

Apparently, God has abandoned us. It's time for us to take things into our own hands. It's why I'm making my way into politics.

ryanviolence #fundie whywontgodhealamputees.com

IF the NT were a false document, i would have been proven false and abolished before the end of the second century.

defense:

manuscripts of the new testament date back to the year 100.
not even 70 years after the events described. to say that the new testament is entirely or even mostly false would be the same as saying that today we could write that the holocaust never happened and that hitler was a generous german leader and everyone would accept it without opposition.


if the new testament were false, the jews and other non-christians would have opposed the stories and had them destroyed rather than re-written (almost 15,000 times, more than any other peice of ancient literature) and widely distributed.

if you believe it was all made up, then test this. write a book about WWII and omit the holocaust and hitler's hatred of the jews. if it becomes widely accepted, then you may be right.

Cone of Shame #announcement fstdt.com

Having done my serious review of the code, I'm going to bump the full reworking of the site up rather than trying to get a handful more features added into what already exists. The code works, but that's about the extent of it, aside from search which I've completely re-written and some of the core quote retrieval code there's little to salvage in what I have.

But, the bits of good news:
*User accounts won't be removed, I have control over the data and can port accounts to whatever I need to.
*I'm going to do some improvements to general lay out, but I will keep the relatively simple layout because it works on damn near anything. Just some rounding or nicer menus. Maybe even a "Change your archive" selection that's actually visible.
*Friendlier URLS will be a thing, and I'll do my damnedest to continue to support core existing URLs. I don't see any reason I can't keep them as of now.
*The crux of my implementation is going to be tags, particularly in seeing if I can get them to work along with some of the key technology improvements I've been eyeing.

There are a few other smaller bits that I'm looking at working in based on people's suggestions, and I intend to have at least a high level specification for what I'll be producing for public consumption and critique before I start getting into the heavy lifting. But the core of this is, unless it's a bug fix it'll come along with the new version. I'll take reports of bugs and deal with them as they come up, but I've been fighting the urge to make myself a cone of shame as I looked over what I'm working with after four years of professional development, so it's not getting any more work done for it.

diggerfortruth #fundie #conspiracy #racist diggerfortruth.wordpress.com

10 Reasons why Hitler was one of the Good Guys
Initially I had intended creating a piece titled “10 Myths about Hitler” but decided that there were so many, that I switched topic slightly. I understand like most of my work, these areas outlined only give a flavor and are not conclusively resourced. But that’s OK. It’s a carrot and hopefully just enough for people (even skeptics) to do their own research on these controversial areas. When people find things out for themselves, this has much more substance. All these areas are verifiable. They just take a bit of objective, independent research. There are links at the bottom of the page to help one’s research.

1/. He never wanted to kill any Jews Whenever you hear anyone espouse (repeat) the lies about Hitler the nasty Jew-killer. Please always make a point of asking this very simple question: “Where did you get that information from?” Perhaps we all at some point have repeated this fable. Why would we not, when it’s shoved down our throats 24/7, year in year out for decades(?) There hasn’t been a man on this planet who has been demonized as much as Herr Hitler. If Hitler wanted to kill Jews, why oh why throughout all his speeches and manuscripts and his book Mein Kampf did he not mention this? Did he just forget? No, he didn’t say or write it BECAUSE HE HAD NO INTENTION OF KILLING THE JEWS. No matter what amount of destruction he had observed done by the Jews to his people; he had enough self-discipline and ethical code not to take revenge. Being a strong character, he was able to rise above the darkness, the demonic standards of the judaic mindset and show self-restraint and humility. That is why he created ‘containment work camps’ for the Jews and certainly NOT death camps. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

2/. He cared about conditions for the Jews in the work camps Unbeknown to billions of people the Nazi camps were not death camps, nor were they places to carry out human experiments. They were simply containment camps. Something had to be done with these destructive anti-social Jews who were strangling Germany. Thanks to the Jews, Germany had lost it’s moral code and had become debased and de-cultured ….does that ring a bell? Something had to be done! And Hitler did do something – he placed all the Jews in containment camps to allow Germany to breath again. But – this is the key point in this essay/piece. He did it in a way which was ethical. The camps had decent sufficient food (bearing in mind it was war time), they had theaters, swimming pools, football pitches, post offices where inmates could communicate to the outside world, kindergartens, art and music recreation and even prostitutes. Quality sanitation within the camps was paramount and that is why the inmates clothes were regularly de-loused with zyclon B gas. There were no human gas chambers……THAT IS A BIG FAT KOSHER LIE; to which the world has had to endure for over half a century. My theory is that if there had not have been a war effort, Hitler would not have even made the Jews work. AND I bet you the containment camps would have been luxury rehabilitation centers. In order to slowly de-programme the Jews from their mind control cult. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

3/. He had compassion for other sentient beings Many historians claim he was a vegetarian. I believe this is kind of true, he was a pescotarian (he occasionally ate fish); but whether this it is or not, the point is he had a clear connection and affection for his fellow creatures. I’m not suggesting just because he may have been a veggie that therefore he was a good person; but this was a man of compassion and that he recognised the importance of compassion in society. He had so much affection for his German shepherds (picture above with his beloved dog). He banned all animal experimentation, recocnizing it to be evil. Hitler could see the connection between all life forms. It was his level of consciousness. Respect for nature, animals and human life. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

4/. He tried to prevent the destruction of his fellow Europeans Numerous occasions Hitler tried to warn and assist his fellow brethren about the Jewish trap they had fallen for and who really was behind all the warmonger. He dropped fliers from planes trying in vein to prevent Germany and Britain fighting. He initially wanted to make alliances with Britain. Many occasions he gave opportunities to opposing European forces, where he could have slaughtered them. It was his internal spiritual angst for him to be fighting (defending) amongst his European brothers and sisters. He did all he could to avoid war, he was not the warmonger we all have been led to believe. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

5/. He cared passionately about his people and German heritage Hitler observed the degrading machinations of the Jews in Austria and Germany. It not only disgusted and angered him, but saddened him to see how these two nations were being destroyed from the inside out like a cancer – a cancer that his sleepy folksmen could not see. The exact same angst those of us who are Jew-conscious find ourselves in. He was a man who cared about society, a man who cared about culture, who cared about nature, about moral values and about building and improving as opposed to destroying and degrading. He was a man who had fought for his country, in the trenches and been hospitalized for his country. How many of our sell out politicians today can claim that? He was a true spokesman of the people, for the people who had diligently worked his way up from grass roots. From microcosmic pep talks to his fellow workman on building sites, to talks in beer houses, to speeches in basements, to town halls. As well as all the behind-the-scenes work and risks. Slung in jail, mocked and defamed. Endless tireless work to resolve the destruction of his peoples. I would also strongly suggest he cared about all peoples. Yes, including black people, despite the kosher myth he was a supremacist racist. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

6/. He was a humble man, from a humble background Can any of us name one present western politician who can claim that these days? No, today they’re all criminals, fed through the kosher criminal system. All built on materialistic gain and kudos. All content with serving the beast for their demonic and self-serving interests. Their greed and hubris having no boundaries. Hitler worked on building sites as a laborer for crying out loud. How many of these leaches under the guise of politicians do you know have that background? He was also a humble street artist, barely scraping a living together. Some days he had to decide whether to spend his meager earnings on a political book, or to eat – he opted for the former. Now that is passion in politics and a drive for social reform. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

7/. He held correspondence with Mahatma Gandhi This alone doesn’t necessarily suggest he was a good person. But more that Gandhi and Hitler were in alignment on many issues. They both recognized the evil force they were up against and both were coming from a humanitarian position. The bottom line is Gandhi would not have corresponded with a so-called evil mad dictator hell bent on wanting to kill the Jews and rule the world. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

8/. He was a man of God Hitler was NOT an atheist – despite what the Jewish propaganda machine wants us to believe. He often made references to God and spoke in terms of a Divinity. He was somebody who could clearly make the connection between Divine law and Natural laws. He was spiritually and morally driven throughout all his political career. Read his book Mein Kampf to see his consistent reference to Christian values.
tk

Because he was one of the good guys.

9/. He implemented cultural and social reform Throughout Hitler’s political career, his common theme was about ‘cleaning up’. He had seen the filth the Jews had created and desperately wanted Germany to reverse these degrading trends. He banned supermarkets, because he wanted local small businesses to prosper. He banned degrading modern art, as he recognised it for what it was. He banned vivisection (animal experiments), because in his wisdom he could see how futile and unnecessary they were. He encouraged healthy youth activities and social programmes to enhance cultural pride and individual self worth, such as sports and recreational activities. He encouraged men to be men and women to be feminine. He helped develop beauty, cleanliness and pride back into the Germany people. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

10/. He stamped on usury This subject links in most of the points in this list and what Hitler achieved as a leader. But I thought it was essential that this topic was highlighted in isolation, as it was probably the single most important act of bravery and compassion Hitler offered to his people. Unfortunately this act alone was enough to piss off the Jewish IMF and therefore create WW2. Usury is the elite Jews most powerful and demonic weapon amongst their whole armament of destructive weapons. More powerful than their poisons and even their mind control techniques. Because it’s their use of compound interest that enables them to create a stranglehold on every industry and therefore every level of society. Nobody can escape usury – everybody is infected by it. That is why Hitler created his own independent currency as a first move when he came to power. And hey presto – that is why Germany was able to get back on it’s feet and flourish as all nations should. Hitler recognised the judaic invention of usury as unlawful, ungodly and unnatural – and as a talmudic curse which has crippled every host nation the Jews have entered into and ultimately, that which brings about their demise. Hitler freed his people of this curse. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

k k

~~~~~~

In conclusion Hitler was probably the hero of the second world war and the 21st century. A man of ethical courage, a man of spiritual perception and good intent. A spiritual soul who cared – cared about all life forms, all cultures, about goodness and Light and ultimately about Truth. k

Because he was one of the good guys.

Summary

1/. He never wanted to kill any Jews
2/. He cared about conditions for the Jews in the work camps
3/. He had compassion for other sentient beings
4/. He tried to prevent the destruction of his fellow Europeans
5/. He cared passionately about his people and German heritage
6/. He was a humble man, from a humble background
7/. He held correspondence with Mahatma Gandhi
8/. He was a man of God
9/. He implemented cultural and social reform
10/. He stamped on usury

Related info

Video of Gandhi’s correspondence to Hitler http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q49p-mdnX_0

Film on Hitler (which is not told in the Jewish main stream outlets) http://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/

More info on Hitler – I do not agree on the Rence video/interview that Hitler went to Argentina. This is more dis-info/confusion. http://xavianthaze.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/the-unknown-hitler-10-ironic-facts.html kk

Mein Kampf May I suggest when reading it, digest it slowly. It needs concentration and is certainly not a casual weekend read. http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/ k

Deanna Spingola’s amazing comprehensive research Predominantly on WW1 and WW2. Deanna is a historian of Truth. She is passionate about these areas; it really is her forte. We are so grateful for her consistent efforts. http://spingola.com/ k

CODOH http://codoh.com/ kSite exposing the holohoax swindle.

Audio of a debate/discussion with John Friend and Jim Condit on Adolf Hitler http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/4/276/show_4276967.mp3 k

Jusury

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT0grvk16NI&feature=player_embedded http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/michael-hoffmans-online-revisionist.html
“Once again the conspiracy of pitiful, corrupt political creatures and financial magnets made its appearance for whom war is welcome to bolster business. The international Jewish poison of the peoples began to agitate and to corrode healthy minds. Men of letters sent out to portray decent men who desired peace calling them weaklings and traitors to denounce opposition parties as a “fifth column” in order to eliminate internal resistance to their criminal policy of war”
Adolf Hitler
Hitler’s Peace Plans
Compiled by Mark R. Elsis
http://spingola.com/hitlerspeaceplans2.html
Deputy Führer Rudolf Hess
A Courageous Hero For Peace
by Mark R. Elsis
http://RudolfHess.net
Holocaust Revisionism
by Mark R. Elsis
http://HolocaustRevisionism.com

Sharon Henderson #fundie livescience.com

Atheism is the least intellectual idea ever produced by a human, and requires a person to be in denial of a large percentage of the accrued knowledge of mankind.

Atheists believe the universe is the only exception to the fact that all things have a cause, that an explosion produced astonishing order ultimately producing rock soup which came alive resulting in Michaelangelo, Beethoven, and space probes. Logical, scientific stuff if I ever heard it! Those atheists are so smart!

Evolution is disproven by millions of facts, such as the fact that polymerase is a product of it's own translation, which proves Special Creation.

Over 100 yrs ago, Evolution Theory was plausible for true naturalists because of their rejection of God. Biological science was rudamentary and archaic, and provided no information about the operations of the cell. Modern biology has very greatly changed what is known of genetics and biology. It has been discovered that life is based upon information which is digitally encoded and stored in a more compressed form than man's best computer technology. compression schemes. It possesses thousands of 3-dimensional information hierarchies directed to the cell. When the DNA molecule is supercoiled as chromatin, much of it's information is available to the cell which is not available when the molecule is uncoiled, and vice versa. Genetic information when read by the cell's machinery in one direction produces different information than when it is read by the cell's machinery in the other direction. This feature of design alone is so far superior to man's computer software that it is not currently possible for us to conceive how this could have been done while making all of it's information relevant and critical to the organism. It's individual information sequences are overlapping and nested sharing nucleotides between sequences across the entire molecule. It's sequences across the entire 7 ft. long molecule are organized to conform to linguistics laws which go beyond Zipf's law of Linguistics. It contains codes built upon codes which regulate the use of each other. A recent discovery is a code which lies upon codes for proteins, sharing it's base pairs, and regulates how to express those sequences for proteins. If we liken the mechanical funtions of the protein machines of the cell as it interacts with DNA, then the operations mirror the human language properties of phonetics, semantics, syntax, and grammar, and punctuation. The information input and output processing of DNA includes the analytical operations of proofreading, information comparison, cut, insert, copy-and-past, backup and restore, all of which operate by algorithmic operations which possess "if" and "when" statements, just like computer programs. Information, algorithms, and linguistics are all immaterial nature has no potential to produce them. They are products only producible by a mind. During the organism's development, the genetic information instructs the cell on how to turn on and off, like chemical light switches, many sequences of information of the DNA in a supremely complex and yet to be understood orchestral arrangement of various groupings and orders so as to build the structures of the organism. These patterns of genes being switched on and off is so complex that man will likely never be able to decipher it. Science has disproven evolution and proven that life was created. If you want to believe in evolution because you refuse to acknowledge the existence of our creator, nobody can stop you. But doing so is to be a denialists of the discoveries of modern science - things which the outdated concept of Charles Darwin over 150 yrs ago could not have predicted. Believing in evolution today is as antiquated as it was to believe that flies arose from meat or frogs arose from mud a century prior to Darwin. Today's evolutionists are hold-outs, and will be written of by future historians as the dogmatic denialists they are.

'Coach' Dave Daubenmire #fundie youtube.com

I, I, I finished yesterday's show with something that I think is, is, is uh was pretty profound, infact the Lord worked, worked on me all day yesterday. The whole idea that Liberal and Left are not the same thing, they're not the same thing.

Leftism, Leftism, think about this. People would call someone like me a fundamentalist. "He's a right-wing fundamentalist." When's the last time you've heard them say 'left-wing fundamentalist'? When's the last time you've heard them identify something as a 'left-wing fundamentalist'? Now don't, don't please don't, THANK GOD STEPHEN HAWKING'S DEAD, thank God. Is that is that date, not date, yeah Stephen Hawking has been?

[Yeah.]

Hey listen, I'm sorry. I hope he found the Lord, but, hey. He ain't an atheist any more. Hey, he ain't an atheist any more!

[He, he didn't find the Lord.]

Yeah. Yeah, well, so good. I don't cry, I mean, I don't cry. SORRY! I signed on. So, if I'm a 'right-wing fundamentalist', is there such a thing as a 'left-wing fundamentalist'?

Omnios #fundie allspark.com

(Historical revisionism FTL)

Look, as I said before, we did that back during WW2. What's stopping us from doing it again? Tree-huggers like you.

In those compounds, no-one was harmed, they lived their lives normally as they could. It was just an interment camp, not a death-camp!

All the tree-huggers like you guys are why we look bad to the rest of the world. We're whimps now. We didn't take no slag back in WW1, WW2, Korea, Veitnam, and the Gulf War. (Sure we pulled out of Vientnam, but the Sounth Koreans won eventually.)

If I ran the world, there'd be only four rules: No rape, No murder, No racial discimination, and No theft. Everything else would be legal.

Ashley Rae Goldenberg #fundie libertywithoutapologies.com

Recently, I became aware that Philadelphia enacted a piece of legislation which mandates that all public buildings must include a restroom catering to transgenders in addition to the traditional male and female restrooms. Strangely enough, some libertarians have defended this project as a move towards equality.

[...]

There are quite a few people–particularly on the internet–who feel as if they are animals. Quite a number of these individuals say that they are actually cats. Should the government be mandated to place litter-boxes everywhere in order to accommodate these individuals since they would feel oh-so persecuted to have to use a regular restroom? As well, the textbook psychology example of delusion happens to be people who truly believe they are Napoleon. These people are adamant that they are Napoleon. Should the government be mandated to build everyone who thinks they’re Napoleon their very own Versailles and act as France in order to treat their dysphoria? Of course not. It would be laughable for the government to be required to appeal to these segments of the population; yet, taking “equality” to the extreme, the government must provide for these people, or else the government is “depriving equal access” to the group and “not treating them equal to everyone else.”

Everyone (read: everyone) knows that “male” and “restrooms” refer to a person’s genitalia. It’s just merely less obscene for facilities to say “women” and “men” versus “vagina” and “penis.” There is no need to change how things work just because a very tiny percentage of the population might potentially feel uncomfortable. Certainly, there is no need to have tax-payers foot the exorbitant bill for something as irrelevant and inconsequential as additional bathrooms for people who may never even use them. In fact, the construction of these restrooms has huge potential for exorbitant abuse of tax-payer money.

Since the transgender restrooms are going to be installed under the banner of “equality” and “human rights”, the government will not shy away from going all out in order to fund it. No politician wants to be known as that person who said “no” to funding something as great as equality, of course—especially when the town said it has an agenda of catering to the gay community!

forgive_the_sinner #fundie reddit.com

[Commenting under "The Church of England has called on the government to ban conversion therapy and has condemned the practice, which aims to change sexual orientation, as unethical and potentially harmful."]

@kizmaus

@forgive_the_sinner
So why would they want to purposefully change someone's sexual orientation? What the fuck is wrong with this piece of shit world?

Bullshit like makes me wish hard right lunatics like Hitler had won ww2.

Retards, such liberal nonsense will trigger wars far more disgusting than ww1 and ww2 combined. But maybe that is for the best.


you do realise that the persecution of gay people by the nazis was a thing, right? they were sent to concentration camps. your comment doesn't make much sense at all.

If today's retarded society continues to push such nonsense agendas like the "come and get transformed into homosexual, because it's the new liberal fad", the concentration camps will open up again. Do i need to draw a cute picture to help you understand this?

Cyberzyme #conspiracy amazon.com

History is always written by the victor and in the case of our history the victors of WW1 and WW2 both were the elite bankers as the world was lied to as to the true reason for the wars. Hitler was not the bad person they made him out to be he was made bad by the banker elites and the politicians who were in bed with the bankers. They backed him into a corner with no way out even after he tried to solve the war diplomatically they wanted him dead and the German people crushed for trying to break away from the bankers vise like grip over the country and the people.

No leader of any country has ever done so much in so little of time for the people of their country. This can only happen if the people were behind that leader 100%. These are facts that can be seen by anyone and can not be denied, all one has to do a little research. It is also true that such a leader would have to love his people also evident by what he did to get them out of poverty and into prosperity. For those who would deny such things I say you did no research and are closed minded. It is easier to do nothing then something, it is easier to destroy then create. What one Nation created in just five years it took many nations seven years to destroy. This says volumes about how much Hitler and the German people did and how hard they worked and fought to keep what they accomplished only to go down in defeat all because the true Monsters of the World had an agenda to destroy so they could control the World and that agenda is still in play today. They continue destroying Nations so they can rebuild them to fit a model to suit them and not the general population.

I see as usual some people are making this out to be about Jews and Germans and that was not the case. Cherry picking facts to fit a model of anti Jew point of view is the common current accepted theme behind WW2 but that is just not true. The truth is it was about Banker Elites and ruling class people who wanted Power and control for the purpose of social and economic engineering an agenda of mad men the true monsters of History as it will one day be known. It is a fact that the top bankers of the time as well as in our current time are the ones who are writing history demonizing Germans as monsters as a way of distracting people away from the truth that it was a War of economics, power and control not Jews and Germans. It is also a fact that over 100 times more people of died and suffered from these mad men War mongering control freaks over the last 125 years then in WW2 and there were way more non Jews killed then Jews proof of cherry picking facts to fit a model. This is a great read and should be read by everyone. For those who say no facts are presented you did not see the forest through the trees.

John "Birdman" Bryant #racist exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.com

Jews denounce the presumed genocide of Jews by the nazis, and yet are busy doing exactly that to the Palestinians. It is a psychological truism that guilty parties often accuse others of exactly what they (the guilty) are guilty of. If anyone deserves to be gassed, it is the Jews.

Jews denounce the presumed genocide of Jews by the nazis, and yet Jews practiced genocide on the Germans, as detailed by James Bacque in his chronicle of Jew Eisenhower's postwar internment camps. They also advocated it in the book 'Germany Must Perish', a book written in the WW2 period by a Jew named Kaufman, and popularized by the sycophantic praise of Jewish book reviewers.

Jews denounce the brutality of the nazis, and yet the major acts of brutality in the Camps were carried out by kapos -- Jewish trusties whose position gave them the power of life and death over inmates.

Jews denounce the brutality of the nazis, and yet Israel is the only 'Western' country that permits torture, altho the influence of the Jewish lobby and such 'legal experts' as Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz has virtually legalized it in America.

Jews denounce the brutality of the nazis, but deaths among American POWs held by Germany in WW2 occurred at a lower rate than in the American population as a whole. Hey, a break from all that fatty American food was just what Our Boys needed!

Jews denounce the brutality of the nazis, yet during WW2, Jewish guerrillas sunk a ship which was full of Jews bound for Palestine in order to blame it on the British and create more sympathy for Jewish immigration to Palestine, an area which was then under British control. Several similar cases of Jews killing their own for political purposes in WW2 have been reported.

Jews make much of the 'blood libel' which accuses Jews of killing gentile children and using their blood for cooking -- an accusation which is not without evidence; but Jews have in fact engaged in the greatest of all blood libels by accusing Germany of the Holocaust.

One of the greatest Jewish Holocaust legends of WW2 was the story of Anne Frank, the scion of a rich Dutch Jewish family. As it happens, however, her 'diary' upon which the legend was based was of questionable authenticity -- it was at least partly written by her father -- and in particular disguised the fact that -- far from 'hiding' from the nazis -- Anne's father was actually making a good living by supplying the nazis with food goods. For her part, Anne died in a concentration camp of typhus -- probably one of those lousy Jews.

Unnamed /pol/ posters #wingnut #psycho archive.4plebs.org

[Comments under "Basedwanger"]

@Unnamed poster

All hail Basedwanger!

>An officer of the Waffen SS, the elite military arm of the National Socialists.
>He kills untermenschen and doesn't afraid of anything.
>Earned a Knight's Cross, the highest military award of the National Socialists.
>Came up with dozens of creative ways to kill Jews, each one enough to bring a tear of admiration to Zyklon Ben.
>His brigade is estimated to have killed 170,000 partisans.
>His symbol, the crossed grenades is still used by National Socialist remnants.
>Was given a concentration camp to run. Went above and beyond by exterminating the undesirables placed in it.

From another unnamed poster:

>Here's the truth about Basedwanger. A man constantly slandered by (((historians))) as a child molester and criminal when in reality he is a true aryan ubermensch as Himmler and Gottlob Berger described him.

His first acts in combat were in WW1, receiving an Iron Cross 2nd and 1st class and finishing the war as a Lieutenant.
Between WW1 and WW2 he fought as a paramilitary in anti-commie actions, such as fighting and being wounded in the town Sangerhausen, being celebrated as the liberator from the Red terrorists, being made an honorary citizen. He also gained a doctorate in political science in 1922. For a time, he worked in a textile factory run by a Kike, but regularly donated from the SA, repatriating some of the wealth that the Kike stole from honest Germans. Due to Kike manipulation, he was blacklisted from employment and had his doctorate revoked. Lastly, he fought in the Spanish Foreign Legion during the Spanish Civil War, which is where Gottlob Berger recognized him as the impressive man that he is and even helped remove his blacklisting and restore his doctorate.
During WW2 he was the leader of the 36th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS, that would later be nicknamed the "Dirlewanger Brigade" in his honor, formed from reformed poachers. His main activity was anti-partisan and commanding a labour camp. The judge (((Georg Konrad Morgen))) tried to end Dirlewanger but failed and was rightfully demoted and sent to the Eastern Front. He and his unit were later assigned to anti-bandit operation in Belarus where his achievements were recognized with a German Cross in Gold. He was reported as having slain 14,000 bandits. He then fought in the Warsaw uprising of 1944 and where he was promoted to the rank of SS-Oberfuhrer and earned his Knight's Cross. He then fought in the Slovak National Uprising.
He was killed by the Allies who after imprisoning him, had him brutally beaten to death without trial.

matt gill #conspiracy attackthesystem.com

Guess what…. this has happened in the past and the other countries are already prepared to deal with it. Remember Germany…. chances are that whatever you were taught, or believe to be true about the national socialist movement you are probably wrong or have bunk information. The numbers of dead in “internment camps” were created by the allied bombing of supply lines and factories…. Judea DID declare war on Germany first. BUT MY POINT…. remember a while ago… probably over 10 years by now. China had a complete internet blackout….. with that being said… every nation has the ability to cut off communications and transportation with ANY OTHER COUNTRY…. the best part of it…. THEY CAN CLAIM WERE THE ONES BOYCOTTING….. If there was an armed revolt and any change DID come its probably pre-arranged…. Then to the rest of the world we will start to be viewed as “isolationists”…. and the strange thing about nations that become “isolationists” (keep in mind the root word ISOLATION)… these nations are almost ALWAYS eventually accused of attempting GLOBAL DOMINATION…..

The people behind this that created the cesspool we are currently living in are also responsible for exposing that same cesspool…… think about this topic and be prepared for what is inevitably coming….. population control. Seriously though, you need to start seeing how “they” plant the trees that “they” later chop down…… War is for control…. and that’s ultimately it. Think about it in ANY context. American Civil War…. Lets take as many able bodied members of society who have families or will inevitably have families…. both sides…. take them and line them up… then have them shoot each other…. who gets to raise that next generation and instill new values into THEM. WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam etc etc etc etc etc……. go back and look at the TOTAL numbers of deaths and ask why like with ww2 we are always pressured to remember the jewish victims… in my opinion every single soldier and every single member of the affected societies were victims……especially in the long run…..population control people…… ITS COMING TO A TOWN NEAR YOU……

Stephen A. Coston, Sr #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

"Royalty, Rumors and Racists"

BY STEPHEN A. COSTON, SR.

AUTHOR OF THE NEW BOOK:

KING JAMES
The VI Of Scotland & I Of England
Unjustly Accused?

The character assassination of His Majesty King James VI & I is an ongoing evolving process that has matured in this present day to a sort of "open season" of differing opinions variously setting forth different theories and hypotheses on the whys, hows, and ifs of the alleged "homosexuality" of King James VI & I. Part of the reason for so many differing opinions is that many historians and would-be historians have forsaken fact for fictional accounts on the life of King James VI & I. Without facts to restrain the imagination the investigative process turns into a rumor mill and as such is an aberration of the historical process. Often these highly speculative accounts, contemporary or modern, are based not on the actual life and words of King James VI & I but on what these individuals THINK what King James VI & I said and did meant. Honest professional historians are beginning to admit this and this is most welcome; however, King James VI & I still has his ardent critics.

More often than not even when actual facts of King James VI & I are presented they are subjected to interpretive twists designed to give the reader the impression that the words and deeds of King James VI & I support the allegations commonly leveled against him. Case in point, it is a known fact King James VI & I was handicapped from birth with weak limbs and injured himself many times. This caused him to have an unsteady gait. To compensate for this King James VI & I often leaned on his most trusted councilors and friends which also happened to be members of his personal staff, individuals critics freely term "favorites." It is often stated that "James was fond of leaning all over his beautiful young favorites" giving the reader the impression King James VI & I did so not because of a physical handicap but because of sexual attraction to same. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Further, it is also freely alleged that King James VI & I "passionately kissed" his "favorites" in public.

Critics of King James VI & I are fond of inferring from the above that King James VI & I engaged in the "French kissing" of his "favorites." They then use this assumption as yet another "proof" to support their contention that King James VI & I was indeed truly a "homosexual."

What the detractors of King James VI & I utterly fail to realize; however, (to their detriment) is the fact that the accounts responsible for popularizing this characterization were penned by individuals who hated not only King James VI & I as a Scot, but the whole country of Scotland as well. They were some of the most militant racists of the time of the most vicious type. Some of their contemporaries knew this and railed against them and defended King James VI & I and it is quite the mystery why modern critics seem not to know this.

Another point that critics of King James VI & I fail to recognize relative to this issue of kissing is that King James VI & I "slobbered" when he ate his food, consumed his drink, or even when he "kissed" someone's hand or cheek. Are we to infer then that King James VI & I passionately kissed inanimate objects, foods and drinks and bodily extremities? What about the widely accepted practice of a monarch's kiss at court to show the King's favor upon an individual? Besides that what of the British acceptance of public kissing for all kinds of events and circumstances. Are we then to infer that the whole island of Great Britain was a hot bed of homosexuality?

It is also inferred that because some individuals rejoiced to have King James VI & I's "legs soon in their arms" upon their return to court that this is somehow indicative of a reference to a sexual position. However, there exist many woodcuts depicting just this position of many noble and common men in with King James VI & I at court. It was customary to prostrate oneself at the feet of the monarch when allowed so close to His Majesty's person to receive a welcome, greeting or honor. King James VI & I's own son, the future King Charles I, himself was in just this position at the feet of his father when he returned from Spain. It is amazing that such shallow reasoning can be allowed to be pawned off as legitimate historical analysis.

Finally, much is made of King James VI & I articulating in his writing that he "loved" someone of the same gender giving the reader the mistaken belief that "love" stood for a sexual attraction and thus yet another "proof" of the "homosexuality" of King James VI & I. Also, it is alleged that King James VI & I "justified homosexuality many times" in his writings.

The most common offered "proof" of this mistaken assertion is a quotation from King James VI & I's speech to Parliament which is violently ripped from its intended meaning and context. For an in- depth refutation of this form of argument the diligent reader is referred to my book King James VI Of Scotland & I Of England - Unjustly Accused.

The Reverend Barrie Williams sums up the desperation of this reasoning:

"... there must be many besides myself for whom nine short words of the King are sufficient: 'Jesus had His John, and I have my George.' King James was in every estimate a devout protestant, and anyone who can believe that he would cast aspersions on the moral integrity of Our Saviour would have no difficulty in believing that the world is flat."

The sheer etymological ignorance of this type of argument is astounding! In my book King James VI Of Scotland & I Of England - Unjustly Accused I examine the widespread and commonly accepted practice of men and women writing to each other in loving terms and expressing their "love" for one another. Such Jacobean stylistic expressions of this kind were in no way indicative of sexual attraction or homosexuality.

I believe Lucius Annaeus Seneca said it best when he wrote:

"... they refute their case by means of the very passages which lead them to infer it."

Certain revisionist historians would have you believe otherwise and advocate the use this method to prove Biblical characters were likewise "homosexuals" to include Jesus Christ, David and Jonathan. These types of evidences, if you can call them that, are the types of things that critics of King James VI & I use to validate their claims. When they can't force King James VI & I to say what they want they simply make him "mean" what they want. Or, in other words, what they can't find stated they simply infer is there and place between the lines even though it is not "in the lines." However, if King James VI & I did not mean what he wrote then who is anyone to tell us what he actually meant?

As far as "witnesses" go, critics can only cite a handful of contemporaries of King James VI & I and most of these were men fired from office (sour grapes), or were political or religious enemies of the King, or they were otherwise disgruntled courtiers with an ax to grind and none ever were eye witness to any overt sexual acts on the part of King James VI & I.

Not only this but I have not found one yet that ever formally accused King James VI & I of directly being a homosexual and brought his case before any legal or religious body not to mention attempting to obey the precepts of Scripture in making such outlandish claims. For an in- depth examination of the charges commonly leveled at King James VI & I the careful reader is referred to my book mentioned previously.

It is obvious that myriad are the claims leveled at James Charles Stuart's (King James VI & I) moral character or lack thereof. However, out of this great sea of negative opinion the tide is fortunately turning away from the shores of libel and gossip and heading towards the calm home port of objectivity and evidentiary concerns.

Historians like the rest of our society are not immune from the influences of modern faddish trends and regrettably King James VI & I has suffered more than his share of diatribes that are directly due to a falling away from classical objective interpretive methods that were long indicative of the traditional historical method. Recent trends have captivated modern historians and led them to experiment with eisegetical techniques and to put it colloquially "tabloid style journalism." Therefore, much that has been written regarding His Majesty King James VI & I has not been the result of a balanced exegetical method.

Further complicating the situation and making matters worse has been the regrettable over reliance by historians on certain scurrilous sources that were produced in an era when libels of the Stuarts and the Monarchy were at a premium in general and whose opinions were motivated by a distrust and outright hostility to the noble Scots as a nation and King James VI & I in particular. King James VI & I being the first Scot to sit on the English throne and the natural father of the last Stuart King to reign in England before the regicide of The Royal Martyr, King Charles I, King James VI & I was naturally a prime target for abuse.

Making an easy target for his pursuit of peace and his many physical handicaps, King James VI & I was and is ill treated by many who venture to put pen to paper with a view to ruminating on the character of this much misunderstood Monarch. Like all of us in the course of King James VI & I's life he made enemies, and as king he had more than his share. Not only this but King James VI & I had to deal and overcome outright racism against his home of birth, Scotland. It is a sad fact that most of King James VI & I's contemporary critics were either disgruntled courtiers who were removed from office by King James VI & I himself or otherwise suffered loss of political or peerage advancement under King James VI & I or were haters of the whole Scottish nation!

Much indeed has been written on King James VI & I and because of this plethora of information a few researchers when doing analysis on King James VI & I simply refer back to past popular and easily obtainable sources rather than expending time and effort in obtaining rare and difficult to find first hand accounts of either the critical or ameliorative sources. Most indeed who have written about King James VI & I have never actually sat down to read what he actually wrote. This environment has created a prime climate for the kind of slanders and libels King James VI & I has been subjected to.

In my years of research on the life and character of King James VI & I, I have found that there is a great reluctance on the part of some of the more militant and bellicose of modern day critics of King James VI & I who claim to have facts to prove (beyond what they assert in their books) King James VI & I was a homosexual.

They seem unwilling to stand up to investigative criticism of their conclusions. They speak of research but balk at detailing the fruits thereof. They are fond of citing whole volumes of books and articles which they claim validate their assertions but refuse to justify any conclusions or data found therein. Some of the more extreme "Christian" critics of King James VI & I are extremely reticent about applying Biblical injunctions against gossip and rumor to their sources or even allow King James VI & I the protection of Scripture as found in Deut. 19:15 or I Tim. 5:19. Further, some are found to deny King James VI & I even professed to be a Christian! I find this extremely curious that such individuals who claim to be "Christians" would ignore Biblical injunctions on falsely accusing a brother and the evidentiary requirements to sustain charges of the type they advocate.

Thankfully, modern secular critical opinion on King James VI & I is reevaluating the negative assertions of his moral character and moderate critics of King James VI & I are now admitting that these charges are basically OPINION not historical facts! As noted above, only a few extremist and militant and the most ardent of King James VI & I's critics are espousing some of the most vociferous and invectively rancorous libels of King James VI & I.

I have also found in the course of my research a most curious phenomenon, that there is almost a total vacuum of consideration of what King James VI & I actually wrote or what he believed outside of a few brief excerpts of his writings which are more often than not stripped from their context or misinterpreted almost beyond recognition. Great weight almost to the point of complete dependence is attached to the writings of a few disgruntled courtiers, racists and bigots (Sir Anthony Weldon, Francis Osborne and Sir Edward Peyton and a few others).

The writings of Peter Heylyn, Sir William Sanderson, Bishop Godfrey Goodman and Anthony A. Wood and others (not to mention King James VI & I himself) are almost totally forsaken thus creating an unbalanced view of King James VI & I as viewed from contemporary accounts. Similarly, most modern works which discount the critical view of King James VI & I are also almost completely ignored by those who wish to paint King James VI & I as a homosexual.

When authors are unduly influenced by the scandal value of such poor sources they tend to rely on them in extreme and thus forsake detailed historical research and ignore the principles of evidentiary preponderance of evidence and thus sacrifice this for the propensity of our frail human nature in its attraction for dirt and scandal. Contradictory applications of principles and imbalanced research techniques can only result from a defective research method. Unfortunately this type of phenomenon has run rampant and caused many such evaluations to run amuck of the facts concerning King James VI & I.

I have not found any persons yet who libel King James VI & I as being a homosexual who are willing to allow themselves to be judged based on the same lines of evidence and principles upon which they unjustly convict King James VI & I .

All these factors coupled with the cultural and etymological ignorance prevailing in our day and the outright historical bias of some against King James VI & I have produced a situation where King James VI & I's accusers have played free with the actual historical facts and in some cases invented more ingenious eisegetical interpretations than any stretching of the imagination could ever produce. Thus the facts of history have been traded for the inventions of the imagination and regrettably there has of yet been no limitation to the unbridled attacks on the ever blessed memory and reputation of His Majesty, King James VI & I. When such pseudo-history is accepted for the real thing and we refuse to be bound to actual historical facts and opinions are masqueraded in place of reality then no valid conclusions can ever be reached.

In my attempts to request evidence that is commonly purported to exist by the sternest critics of King James VI & I sadly I have found that this evidence is often elusive and at best highly speculative. Instead what I have been offered in place of hard data from King James VI & I's militant and extremist critics is sarcasm, evasion, ridicule, rudeness and outright refusal to provide the requested information.

From King James VI & I's more mild critics they are at least recognizing the fact that their opinions have led to incorrect assumptions that accusations of homosexuality leveled at King James VI & I are factual, which they are not, and are based on speculation and opinion. Many are even willing to entertain the belief that King James VI & I might not have been homosexual at all. This is something that King James VI & I's hard line critics have yet to do and seem dead set against.

The personal slanders and racially motivated innuendoes and epithets were indicative more of the declarant's anti-Scottish bias and resultant dislike of King James VI & I than they were etiologically the result of actual facts. Thus, the scandalous artifacts which have been so carefully exhumed setting forth the "dirt" of the matter are in need not of study but of burial. These slurs are only allegorically and vaguely implying misdeeds on the part of King James VI & I in the most indirect manner and should be highly suspect. Often by their own account imagination played a key role in their assertions and this was based on their own particular interpretation (not provable facts) of the actions of King James VI & I. It is highly coincidental that the promoters of the charges were those who either bore no good will to the Scots or otherwise had a grudge to bear against their King. So, like irreverent grave robbers having no respect for the dead they attempt to steal that which does not belong to them and not content with desecrating the memory and honor of King James VI & I they also trample under foot his blessed memory. This ought not be so!

There seems to be a divergence of opinion amongst King James VI & I's critics. This is indicative of the fact that modern attitudes on King James VI & I are changing and the hard liners are refusing to budge. So far factual rebuttals of the hard line opponents of King James VI & I have had little effect as the pugnacious critics are refusing to yield to the actual evidence and are holding on to the rumors of the past. Such is the decline and decay of our society when we will allow the least of us, those who cannot defend themselves, to be thrown to the wolves if you will and be unjustly accused. In our passive acceptance of this injustice I see the fate of us all in that one day we may all find ourselves the target of false accusers. Where have moral and historical ethics gone!

The sheer bankruptcy of the critical case should be evident to any sincere lover of history. To those who will convict King James VI & I on the scantiest of evidence it must be seen that these individuals will thus embody the demise of all true history. The plethora of moral indictments and claims against King James VI & I's character are not historical facts but rather in all actuality primarily unjust criticisms which are commonly mistaken for facts.

Serious dialogue seems to have been relegated to the museum of ancient history and fallen into disuse. However, the criticisms of King James VI & I actually reveal more about our society's preoccupation with scandal and dirt than they do about the life and character of King James VI & I . We can no longer allow lopsided research to overpower the facts of history.

The best advise and observation on this sad situation ironically comes from King James VI & I himself. As His Majesty King James VI & I noted almost prophetically long ago:

"And principally exercise true wisdom in discerning wisely between true and false reports. First concerning the nature of the person reporter; next, what effect he can have in the well or evil of him whom of he maketh the report; thirdly, the likelihood of the purpose itself, and the last the nature and past life of the delated person ... "

And:

"They quarrel me (not for any evil or vice in me) but because I was a king, which they thought the highest evil, and because they were ashamed to profess this quarrel they were busy to look narrowly in all my actions, and I warrant you a moat in my eye, yes a false report was matter enough for them to work upon."

His Majesty King James VI & I,

Basilicon Doron

James Laffrey #racist whiteswillwinparty.org

Thomas Jefferson said that we needed to keep and bear arms for use against the government when it becomes an enemy of us White people. He said he expected our use of arms against the government to be necessary perhaps as often as every generation. And it was necessary generation after generation, as proved by the very existence of the events we call the Civil War, WW1, WW2, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, 9/11, and the current little wars killing anybody but jews.

The jews are killing our race right here in the USA and using our duped young men and women in the Military Machine to kill others around the world.

Obviously, killing works.

We must retaliate by killing them. All races should join us, but the other races lack the intelligence and bravery to do it. Maybe, just maybe, they will follow our example. But only we, the former and future great White race, can make it happen.

Adolf Hitler’s worst flaw was that he did not do what the lying scum jews accuse him of. He did not order the mass killing of jews. He should have. Many jews, but far from all, were put to work, or to otherwise reside, in prison camps. The jews he left alive and free to live in Germany (and Poland, Austria, and France) functioned as an intelligence and sabotage network against him and all Whites. And Germany lost.

We must win. We must kill jews to win.

God #racist newsnet14.com

Alexandra is right.

It is the power of the mass media to shape minds and control behavior. Even if White men are less prone to mating with nig-nog hos, there are certainly some major problems involving fratricidal wars (American Civil War, WW1, WW2, etc.), widespread obse$$ion with niggerball games (which are the ultimate form of nigger worship), drug abuse and alcoholism, White males in ZOG’s “law enFORCEment” gleefully enforcing “integration”….. thereby guaranteeing that White girls will be in close proximity to, and mate with, niggers. Oh, and the rather large number of White men who mate with ‘female’ gooks, spics, and mongrels.

So what is worse……. the White girl who has been programmed 24/7/365 by the mass media, schools, churches, etc. since day one, to truly believe that niggers are glorious and righteous, and sacred beings of holiness, and that Jesus loves White girls who love the “precious creatures of the Lord”?

Or

The White men who enFORCE racial “integration”, miscegenation, and suicidal “tolerance” among the masses, with glee?

Who was it that murdered Robert Mathews when he tried to start a White revolution?

The old Jewish methods of “Divide and Conquer” are more effective today than ever before. The split between White male and White female is one of the Jew’s most successful strategies for destroying the White race.

The Jew always plays both sides—- promoting feminism, lesbianism, and strong anti-White male, pro-nigger ideas amongst White women. While, at the same time, the Jew promotes hostility, hatred, and aggression towards White women, amongst the White male population, along with faggotry, pornography, etc. etc.

Silencio #racist dailykos.com

It's the sickness of whiteness.

Whiteness is a sickness in the U.S. It leads to, produces, a type of delusion and profound moral ignorance in the people who categorize themselves as "white" (like other people who say Jeebus talks to them, or that they're Napoleon). People of good will should reject whiteness. Denounce it. In the words of the incomparable Sarah Palin (!!) refudiate whiteness.

James Laffrey #racist whiteswillwinparty.org

Circumcision is a Crime of Mutilation against Whites

Jews are the originators of the bloody genital mutilation ritual of circumcision — that is, cutting off the natural foreskin of the penis.

They can do it to their own, of course, which they have historically done.

Also, the Muslim-Arabs can do it to their own, as they are known to do.

But jewry has coerced that unnatural and stupid ritual upon the White race.

Why have they done so?
How have they done so?

Jews have coerced Whites into circumcision so that Whites would not outlaw the practice among the jews infesting our country (countries). Of course, there are secondary reasons, but they are not necessary here.

Jews have succeeded in this crime by coercion by verbally terrorizing young parents. Jew doctors have both exaggerated and lied about supposed harms in keeping the natural foreskin and supposed benefits of cutting off the natural foreskin.

Three excellent, brief videos by three different White professionals are presented in a group at these links on one site (on YouTube, which is jewTube):

1. Dr. John V. Geisheker (4:25. This video is displayed at the top of this article.)

2. Steven Scott, Gavin Sisk, and George Denniston M.D. (19:20. YouTube restricts this science-specific video to signed-in viewers only.)

3. Marilyn Milos, R.N. (9:44)

Each video repeats some vital information and adds very interesting new information. Taken together, they are completely conclusive on this subject.

For newcomers to the fact of jewry infesting the medical profession and the media, I ask you to carry the following question with you. It presents a clear choice related to who has generally provided truth through history and who has generally lied through history.

Who shall you believe: The best of your own White race, or the jews?

jew-rabbi-pedophile-sucks-baby-penis.1In the first video linked above, the doctor mentions “ethnic” considerations. Of course, he is referring to the jew “ethnicity” — actually the jew race.

What shall be the punishment upon the jews for their crime of deliberately terrorizing young White parents into agreeing to let them genitally mutilate us?

Yes, it is genital mutilation. That is what it is called when a similar crime is done to females. And that is what it is when done to males.

Jews coerced my parents. My mother and father, flooded with propaganda and mind poison from the jew-owned media, caved to the subtle terror inflicted by the jew doctors. And my mother caved to the jews and their mind-poison infecting the Catholic network, in which she believed back then. (My father subscribed to no religion.) Thus, I was circumcised. Genital mutilation was inflicted upon me. And I have suffered because of it.

What shall be the punishment upon the jews? If you know me already, you know that I have proved that we are already fully justified in reacting in Self Defense and killing all of jewry. It’s that simple. The crime of circumcision inflicted by terror is yet another capital-punishment crime committed against us.

Their males are already circumcised (except for some crypto-jews), so we may circumcise something else — such as their necks. But we are not the torturous type. We are Whites, and we are the race of all races who seek honor, justice, and improvement in all things. Simple, deserved execution is called for.

Anytime. Anywhere. Every appropriate chance we get.

Justice is to be served upon the jews. For the holodomor. For the deliberate starvation of a million Americans in the jew-contrived Awful Depression (not “Great”). For WW1. For WW2. For each subsequent unnecessary, illegal war. For 9/11. For the ongoing medical murders and mutilations against us. For the ongoing genocide against us by the above methods, and by forced nonWhite immigration, the instigation of violent crimes by nonWhites against us, and constant anti-White propoganda in their media and by our jewed government.

Kill jews. Save America. (Or save whichever White country you are in.) Secure a future for our White children. Fight back. Defend our race and our territory. We must destroy the enemy invaders. That means, kill them. Kill jewry.

Our Freedom Weaponry.
Signed,

James Laffrey

WhitesWillWin!

cosmicgirl #racist stormfront.org

Conversely, females of the brown and black species-races can't stop putting out and crapping litters of goblins. Anyway, i think that Jewish population hovers at 2 percent per region, is because this helps to keep the jew network in place, and helps to keep them 'obscure' and seen as 'merely harmless little jew oddkins', while also ensuring that their reach of influence is as global as possible. If jews completely hemmed themselves into one ethnostate, then it could easily be surrounded, and another 'loller cost' would inevitably happen (allegedly). Also, if they remain spread out (and/or also stealth about who is and isn't a jew) then it is likely that, in the event that we whites wake up and defend ourselves as a species-race, then there is less chance of them being entirely rooted out and done away with, both in terms of species-race, and in terms of reach of power and influence.

After all, if one is not able to be readily pegged as a jew by anyone else, but one knows that oneself is a jew anyway, then once the pieces stop falling, the process of infiltration and long-spanning shenanigans can begin, all over again. This allows them to (to a degree) hide out in white or mildly arabic nations, and foist the consequences of their actions onto the host populace (usually whites) within the region. White inborn ideology and nobility is also exploited, and words are arranged to distract and imp-lie what the jew wishes to misconstrue or make happen. The Jew in modern times is a big fan of things like political discourse, psycho-ology, and ed-jew-cation, because with these arcane things, the jew now knows that they can speak spells of implication, and make white people do their bidding, take their blame, and even become geno-suicidal. This now frees up alot of effort on the part of jews, and allows them to think up, and enact even greater vile actions of ruination upon their hated blood enemy, we Whites.

Imagine it from the jewish perspective (viciously disgusting, i know, but, just for a minute ?); you have no morality, no higher purpose other than wanton revenge, and to rule the world right back into the ground it was built on, and suddenly, circa ww1 and ww2, after thousands of years of getting (inexplicably and repeatedly) one-upped, you discover that your enemies Big Magic, also works on him, even more so than you or the brown and black races. Suddenly, with your enemies grimoires of education and development, he is at your complete mercy; make him dance funny, sing your race's songs and poems, and yes, even make him throw himself on his own sword. All it takes, is the right sorts of words, to cast his own spells upon him. What sort of devilish fun would jew-you have, now that your most intractably hated foe, has become your most entertainingly useful newest minion ?

Brother Ernest #racist #conspiracy #fundie jesuswasnotajew.org

"Jesus" was not the Messiah's name. Our Messiah was not a "Jew!" The Hebrew Israelites were not aware of the French or English language yet, therefore, there is no 'j' in Hebrew. Ergo, Melech HaMoshiach Yahushua ben Dovid, ben Avraham, ben Yah could not have been Iesous. The j letter was not invented until the 17th century by the French. His name is translated as "Yahushua saves." For it shall come to pass that whosoever calls upon the name of YHWH will be delivered, Joel 2:32

What is the Messiah's name? Proverbs 30:4 Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is his name, and what is his son's name, if thou canst tell?

Yahushua is the only heavenly Entity who is the fulfillment of the Name of YHWH.
'Jesus' is the greek word for of Zeus/Iesous. Nowhere are we to call the Messiah by any other name than what was given by YHWH.That name is not "Hail-Zeus"/ Jesus.

All the other angels and messengers have the name of "El" for Elohim, which means gods or rulers, אֱלֹהִים. Gabri(el), Micha(el), Rapha(el), Uri(el), Satan(el), or, any heavenly host, be it good or wicked is called "el" (אֱלֹהִים). Yahushua is the One and Only who carries our heavenly Father's Name. He is the beginning and the end, the Name that is above all names. The Messiah is our Kinsmen Redeemer. Names are important to YHWH. He is never to be called "Lord" or "lord." Satanic jews have purposely translated the name of YHWH to "Lord" בַּ֫עַל which means Baal. Baal is the god of the Canaanites who are also the jews. Jews hate the name of YHWH and they have removed His name over 6,800 times from the Holy Scriptures. Jews have replaced His name with "LORD" so that you would call the Messiah, "Baal."

YHWH's return is certain, for the Messiah must fulfill Obadiah 18, the destruction of Edom. Every eye will see our Kinsmen Redeemer coming from the SKY and step foot upon His flat earth, Revelation 1:7. Many Satanic Jews will wail as the Son has only come for His Kinsmen, of which none are the Jews. The fig tree is the Jew who will wither away while the righteous shall shine like the stars forever. Thus, Revelation 7:1 will be fulfilled. Every knee upon this flat earth will bow the when He returns. Every eye will see YHWH judge the world. This glorious day is ahead of us all. Fake Israel, or as Messiah called them, "the fig tree," aka Edom, the terrorists behind 9/11, put forth her wicked leaves by attacking the Christian Republic of the United States of America. Fake Israel must be judged! The Christian Republic of the United States of America has fallen. It is time for His elect to awaken. The true race of Israelites are nearly extinct, thanks to two massive wars, WW1, and WW2. The hand of Jewry caused both wars. The jews are none of Israel's children. The Jews are the Edomite-Canaanites among us, they are the descendants of those from Mount Seir. Jews are not Semites, Hebrews or Israelites.

aryan_barbarian #racist community.livejournal.com

(aryan_barbarian posted two anti-racism images: one implying that getting rid of anyone who isn't white would curb racism, the other just with the word 'RACISM' crossed out. he apparently supports the first image, classically. this is one of his many responses to being told that whites would just find something else to fight and kill each other over:)

Whites would never fight each other (other then a part of some sporting event) , they were always prompted to do so by Christianity (Semitic religion) and by Jews (WW1 and WW2).

Jay99 #conspiracy stormfront.org

No matter where you go you will be subjected to Jewish brainwashing and most people live their entire life without even realizing it. I've just recently woken up to it myself. It seems so obvious now. The jews have such a strong hold on our countries i went through 4 years at high school doing history 6 months of studying the Romans and another 6 studying Slavery (I might add only whites enslaving Blacks we didn't learn anything else about slavery) the rest we studied WW1 and WW2 and basically all anti German/the Nazi's and pro jew.

It seems so clear now to me about the holocaust but at the time i was studying it i was so blind but that was because we are been brought up in a society were we are not allowed to question things against others. I never learned any proof to the holocaust just that a bunch of jews died and Hitler was to blame. That's a problem i have just now. My mind has to sets it seems. My current one in which i have woken up and know the truth but then i have another one my old one were no matter what i think my mind automatically goes to the old one and makes me think negative. The main reason i don't tell a lot of people about my views is because my old mind takes over. I'm thinking positive i will show them the truth and hopefully wake them up to but then my other mind takes over it automatically tells me what i belief is racist and that i shouldn't do it. It just angers me that we are putting trust in the education system and they are brainwashing us into these beliefs that even when i know its not true. I still think about it before making any decision. It's got such a strong grip on my mind and i know its going to take a bit of time to get passed it and that time will come.

I just can't stand it anymore it annoys me so much that people don't see whats happening and even if i try and say anything to my friends they call me racist and a Nazi. The future is not bright for My country or my Race both are just slowly dying and i hate that we see people aiding to the death (teachers) and we can't stop them. I firmly believe that the only way forward is through strength and power. We can't win a vote with the people currently running our country they won't let it happen. They won't let a party who actually stand up for the white people have their voices heard. The only possible way i see us coming out on top is through violence showing them that we aren't going to allow our races death. Words don't hurt these evil rulers of our once great nations. I honestly hope when we win we can tell the kids of the future how evil these jews really were and see how they like it.

Account Suspended #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Okay I have some more important facts here to prove atheists wrong:
Dark Matter and Dark energy are impossible to detect and scientists believe in it so science believes something it can't prove.
Science is extremely dogmatic.
And that they're evil:
Stalin was an atheist.
Most all atheists support baby killing.
Atheists are never moral because they do not believe in God
Thank you and God Bless. Please put your faith in God not science.

CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Below the level of extravagant male wealth, money doesn’t make a huge DIRECT impact on women’s attraction to men. If a man has a nice car and condo, no economically self-sufficient careergirl will be wowed by that. The benefit of money comes from the confidence it instills in men, which women DO love.

...

If modren Western women are indeed switching to an r-selected reproduction strategy — i.e., focusing on short-term hookups that advantage cads over dads and chads over NOWAGS — then a man’s earning power will have a smaller impact on female attraction than it historically has had in more patriarchal (aka Regulated Monogamy) times when women weren’t paper pushing corporate whores who could afford their own mortgages and streaming pussyhat entertainment packages.

Of course, this will not end well for civilization. When the big bulging mass of beta providers realize they can’t leverage their provisions for a loyal young babe who isn’t saddled with a porn star’s sexual history, they will drop out of the mating market and make just enough to satisfy their immediate needs. Then after the fiat economy collapses from the disengagement of its most competent and conscientious men, there goes the female workforce it enabled, and we’re right back to the primordial patriarchy of young, chaste, dependent women locking down that beta provider while she still has miles of virgin road left on her hodometer.

SchrodingersDick #wingnut #sexist incels.co

Soo... they admit that getting girls into colleges and careers is all part of a ploy to lower birth rates.. not because they’re such great brilliant minds that the workforce is missing on

I read a similar article. Somewhere in the suggestions for action against climate change, they had “shift away from GRP growth and into sustainability and addressing inequality”

“inequality”

nigger.. what the fuck does equality have to do with climate change? They’re trying to cram all their pet ideologies into eachother and package it as one big thing so they can feel really good about themselves like they did something to help the poor downtrodden folks they identify with

Revolutionary #1: “hey what activism did u do today?”

Revolutionary #2: “oh bro I smashed capitalism and inequality that disproportionately affects communities of color because muh evil white man. I wrote an article about climate change and In it I mentioned how we need to smash inequality. Im a noble revolutionary! I’m like Che Guevara bro!”

Atavistic Autist #sexist #racist incels.co

[JFL] Feminists complain about being "parentified" as daughters -- that is, actually taught how to cook and clean, and take care of their siblings

It's funny because these are the only skills that are useful for females to know: nurturing children, preparing food, and maintaining a tidy nest despite their messy, hoarding tendencies (which otherwise lead them to buy tons of useless shit and be Shlomo's favorite consumer).

If they don't want these things to be so offset onto them during childhood, then why are they feminists who champion the entry of females into the workforce, which necessarily overburdens mothers and forces them, if not to hire nannies (a commodified caretaker), then make one out of their daughters?

And what of the fact that children are increasingly deprived of fathers, and many men are forced to be their own fathers in life if they even want a chance at turning out mentally healthy, and many women are compelled to foolishly project father figures onto psychopathic slayers on Tinder who just abuse them and make them insane? Is this what "ending the patriarchy" is supposed to be about?

Amerikaner #racist vnnforum.com

Civil War generation was by far the worst. Worthless White jew tool Northerns killing Idiot White jewsus worshiping Southerns only to end up freeing niggers so that future generations of Whites would be forced to support niggers that would rape and murder future generations of Whites.

Come to think of it, the WW1 is the worst. Those pieces of shit went off to murder Germans (literally their cousins in many cases) as ordered by the jew bankers then returned to America and birthed and raised the WW2 generation so they could finish the destruction of Germany. Without the WW1 generation turning against their cousins on jew orders, WW2 would never have occurred, and the jews never would have come to America and created boomer shits.

Rom831 #fundie rr-bb.com

Science claims evolution, but cannot prove it. Creation has a written record of Noah. Science claims the Big Bang but cannot prove it. Creation has a written record of what was observed by the creator. Science claims when you die you die, but cannot prove it. Creation again has a written record. You may not believe that written record, but that is by YOUR decision. Do you accept George Washington? Napoleon? Chaucer? Voltaire? Shakespeare? Why? All you have is written records of them...

David J. Stewart #racist jesus-is-savior.com

After murdering 50,000,000 American babies by abortion, we now have 50,000,000 illegal foreigners coming into our country to make up the missing workforce. Unfortunately, they are so poor that they're also eating with our food stamps, saturating our hurting schools with non-English-speaking students, living in free Section-8 housing, are getting promoted over citizen's kids because of racial profiling, are bankrupting our hospitals and then blame American citizens for all their problems.

So what we have here are foreigners illegally sneaking into America without any honor, milking the system to rob legitimate hard working American citizens via welfare payouts, committing one-third of all crimes in the U.S., and then blaming America's citizens for their homeland's problems. Talk about ungrateful. I'm tired of hearing paid off stooges like Sean Hannity say that Americans won't do the work which illegals are willing to do. The truth of the matter is that American citizens can't survive on $2 an hour. We do you think 10-20 illegals pile together in rented apartments? That's the only way they can survive. And what do they do with the rest of the money, they buy booze, booze and more booze. Not all of them; but a majority of the Hispanic immigrants in America that I've seen are drunks. We have lost our country. There is no border. No language. No honor. No culture. No class. No morals. No economy. No jobs. No government. Sad!

Brian Wiggins #racist eurocanadian.ca

Canadians from the founding cultures, need to look beyond a conventional political solution. If Catalonia, Khalistan, Israel, Wakanda, “Farrakhanland,” Scotland, Kurdistan, Quebec, and “New” California, why not a homeland for European-Canadians in South-Western Ontario; the Maritimes; the Prairies, around Quebec City or the interior of beautiful British Columbia? It’s British Columbia, after-all.

We can’t be accused of discriminating against people we don’t live with. The massive transfer of wealth and the $35B-$40B fiscal costs of immigration will disappear. Infrastructure savings would be enormous. We’ll never have to worry about being branded racists or xenophobes again. Taxes will decline. Hospitals, currently operating at 135% of capacity in both the Fraser River Valley and the GTA, largely as a result of chain migration, will gradually decline to their intended 85% cap, and we’ll be able to move on our highways again. The Canadian environmental could heal. Employment equity plans will vanish, and organizations can get thousands of our kids out of their parent’s basements and into the workforce.

A new homeland for the founding cultures might seem fantastic or a pipe dream to some but consider that we are now, as of the credit crisis of 2008-09, at a significant historical inflection point. In their bestselling book, The Fourth Turning: What the Cycles of History Tell Us About America’s Next Rendezvous with History, authors William Strauss and Neil Howe describe the seasonal nature of history and foresee an inevitable period of decay that will destroy existing social and political institutions.

Steven K. Bannon, former advisor to President Donald Trump (and many others), agrees that a Fourth Turning began in 2008 with the global financial credit crisis and has argued that the administrative state must be dismantled in advance of the final climax. Canadians, too, should tear down everything that is no longer functional, including our pathological immigration policies and official multiculturalism. In order to renew, forests need fires and rivers need floods.

To be fair, sweeping theories of history are not as well received in academia. The Fourth Turning is non-falsifiable and has been a tough sell to professional historians who have now been co-opted into re-writing and revising history to allow for the occupation of formerly Western ancestral homelands by alien out-groups. William McLoughlin, a former history prof at Brown, believes that it is fantasy to think that “if you put enough data together and have enough charts and graphs, you’ve made history into a science.” Fair enough. Those sophisticated enough to lose money in the capital markets at any time, will confirm that the future is unknowable by definition. Nevertheless, the Turnings are much more than mere happenstance or data mining.

Readers who have stock market experience can find support in Elliot’s 5th and final wave of his grand super-cycle and with Nikolai Kondratieff’s wave theory. The cycle of crises also corresponds with cycles of war identified by Arnold Toynbee and geopolitical cycles identified by William R. Thompson. Keep in mind Vladimir Lenin’s comment that “In some decades, nothing happens; in some weeks, decades happen.”

There’s a lot to be concerned about. North Korea and Iran; the staggering mountain of immoral public debt in the United States and Canada and throughout the West; the crouching, racist and hyper-nationalist tiger dreaming of global domination and increasingly militarizing, with weapons stolen from the West, the South China Sea, or what I prefer to call the North Philippine Sea, are all potential sparks. The world’s greatest threat according to Bill Gates, is an influenza pandemic. The Institute of Disease Modelling predicts that a severe flu pandemic could kill more than 33 million people in just 250 days. Several concerning strains are already circulating.[iv]

Finally, in my view, there is a growing threat of a second civil war exploding out of the incredible divisiveness in the United States. Either of these four “sparks;” debt, China, a flu pandemic, or the outbreak of a second American Civil War or a combination of these threats could ignite the final Fourth Turning “climax” sometime between now and 2025, give or take, according to the theory.

The generational cycle cannot explain the role or timing of these individual threats. Nor can it account for the great events of history, like the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the bombing of Pearl Harbor, President Kennedy’s assassination, 9/11 or the Lehman insolvency. What the generational cycle can do, according to Strauss and Howe, is explain how society is likely to respond to these events in different eras. It is the response, not the initial event, which defines an era according to the theory. [v] According to Strauss and Howe, the crisis period lasts for approximately 20 years.

A financial collapse driven by a debt implosion is certainly plausible. Total debt in the U.S., for example, including Federal, State, Municipal and contingent liabilities in Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare is roughly $207 Trillion. In Canada, the Province of Ontario is a financial train wreck. The province will need to increase borrowing to finance another spending shortfall, adding to an existing mountain of debt, borrowed on our grandchildren’s credit cards, and is forecast to rise to $325 Billion, or more than $22,500 for every man, woman and child in the Province.[vi]

Newly elected Premier, Doug Ford, will find his hands to be tied but at least he has the right mindset and there is some hope that his populist surge will spill over Federally next year. To make matters worse, Moody’s has joined the Bank for International Settlement (BIS) and S&P Global is warning that Canada’s banking system, yes Canada’s, is facing a growing threat of souring consumer loans amid rising interest rates. Canada’s ratio of household debt to disposable income reached a new astonishing record of 171% in the 3rd Q of 2017 and the proportion of uninsured mortgages has increased to 60% from 50% five years ago.[vii]

It is my view, however, that the final spark for the Fourth Turning will be ignited by a Second American Civil War. Either way, the day of reckoning is coming. The chickens will come home to roost.

The Fourth Turning, whatever the final cause(s), has the potential to trigger a political upheaval beyond what we can possibly ever imagine. Strauss and Howe see a return to a more traditional and conservative social order as one of the outcomes. If history is a guide, the probability of retribution for former “collaborators” and for those who resist the new expectations for conformity will be high. There will be no assumption of compassion for the traitors and complacency will not be an option.

On the bright side, fertility rates will rise again, quality of life and prosperity will climb and public investment in infrastructure will surge. We will enter into a period of Peace, Order and Good Government but many nations are likely to be fractured and geographically divided by ethnicity as a consequence.

Yes, there is hope for a new homeland for the founding cultures. This may be our opportunity to take our nation back and hold those responsible for giving it away, without our consent, as traitors. Gird your loins for our next rendezvous with destiny.

Canada is over 400 years old. Our people have a DNA all our own. We belong to a unique and storied nation with its own official languages, religion, history, heroes, mannerisms, culture and identity. We don’t want open borders. We don’t want mass migrations to change Canada into something new. We don’t want to become a minority in our own land. We want our country back.

Canadian “elites” babble about “diversity,” about how much better a country we will be in 2036 when white Europeans are just another minority and we have become a “gorgeous mosaic” of every race, tribe, creed and culture on earth. To many Canadians, such a future entails the death of our nation. To Canadians, millions of African, Chinese, Indian, Arab and Islamic peoples settling in our lands means the annihilation of the historic nation we love, the nation that came into being to preserve us. We will never forgive politicians, whether by accident, or design, if they change our country completely and forever.

Many of these aliens who occupy Canada today have no “cosanguity” with either of the two founding cultures or the larger white European family. From the growing expressions of resentment, contempt and even hostility towards us, it’s clear they we’re not compatible.[viii] Canada is increasingly being filled with people who have absolutely no connection to the great historic Dominion of Canada. They can’t be faulted. Canada was never really created for them but as anti-white sentiment goes mainstream and all of Canada’s non-whites increasingly assert their own racial and ethnic heritage, what will keep Canada together when we lose our white majority? If Euro-Canadians had the same group loyalty as Sikhs, Muslims, Chinese and Indians we would never have permitted these aliens into our land to begin with.

Our ancestors did not create the heroic and adventurous Hudson Bay Company, fight on the Plains of Abraham, Beaver Dam, Stoney Creek, Lundy’s Lane, Michilimackinac Island, Queenston Heights, Paardeberg and Leliefontein, Ypres, Vimy Ridge, Passchendaele, The North Atlantic, in Defence of Hong Kong, The Battle of Britain, Dieppe, D-Day, The Liri Valley, Normandy, the Scheldt, Kapyong and Kandahar, and endure the enormous hardships and sacrifice of the Great Depression, in order for baby boomers to turn the country over to alien out-groups and foreigners who have nothing in common with us and who don’t share our values.

Canada is much more than an idea; it’s much more than a shopping mall. The Fathers of Confederation did not frame the British North America Act to celebrate diversity. It’s the “British” North America Act, after all. Canadians did not spill their blood and treasure around the world for multiculturalism and to become a marginalized, despised but “privileged” minority in the land bequeathed to us by their ancestors; our home and native land. Did we?

If we don’t stop this madness, and establish our own lands, Euro-Canadians will learn soon enough that the non-whites our hyper-altruistic elites usher into 24 Sussex Drive will not fritter away their demographic, political and economic gains in fruitless displays of moral superiority the way we have. A Canada run by non-white aliens and foreigners will be a shockingly different place. Competitive racial and ethnic altruism is not a game non-whites play.[ix] Canadians must force our traitorous elites to abandon policies that will, before long, destroy us all and everything that was bequeathed to us.

I should be careful what I wish for, but as far as I am concerned, the Fourth Turning can’t come soon enough. We are a people. We can create great things if left free to be ourselves and only we can be ourselves. If Canada ceases to be majority white country, it won’t be a country at all. Euro-Canadians should never give up on the idea that this country belongs, first and foremost, to us. We will fight back and the fight has, in fact, already begun. A cold wind is blowing. Winter is coming…

MontUHURU Mimia #conspiracy cinematicsymbolism.blogspot.com

And there’s several ways I could explain how this concept works, but for the sake of not making this post any lengthier than it needs to be, I’ll say this ideology deals with elites knowing that if you want to better control any organization…or organism, one of the best ways to do it is by destabilizing the target and throwing it into a state of dysfunction. Then, you offer the target your solution to the problem. And once this solution is administered, it’s diagnosis will make the target operate in accordance with the desires of the fascist elite.

For example, in the early 1970’s a rich business tycoon said he was at a dinner party and happened to strike up a conversation with a member of the Rockefeller family. While conversing the Rockefeller asked the businessman: “Tell me, what do you think of the Woman’s Lib movement?”

The tycoon responded: “Well, overall I think it’s positive, women getting equal pay for equal work and all.”

The Rockefeller replied: “Listen, we funded Women’s Lib, and the main reason was because we couldn’t tax half the population if women were staying at home and being housewives. Not only did we want to get women into the workforce, but we knew that with both parents out of the home, what essentially would be raising their kids would be the TV, so the generations after theirs would be much easier to program.”

Now, I’d like to focus on the Rockefeller’s last statement about kids being raised by TV. This sentiment is telling when it comes to the elite’s main target for destabilization over the course of the last half-century.

And that target is the nuclear family.

See, if you destabilize the nuclear family and have a spate of one-parent households dominating any country, the children of those households will be infinitely more corruptible than a child coming from a stable two-parent home. Now let me expound on this further…

What I’m not saying is that children from single-parent households are destined to be morally obtuse and criminal-minded, what I am saying is these children will more than likely have some sort of emotional instability from not growing up with both parents. And more than likely, this will affect their decision making to the point where they’ll be more willing to do certain things that the child who has the counsel of both parents won’t. And monetarily, the child may not have access to items they want or need because there’s only one household income. And this more than anything may affect their decision making.

So for the last several decades, the elite have thrown every effort into destroying the nuclear family and keeping it dysfunctional. And one of the best ways to do this is by eradicating traditional gender roles.

Enter the Wachowski brothers…siblings….I mean, sisters.

Now, last year I wrote about Larry Wachowski becoming Lana, and a week ago, I found out that his brother Andy has now taken the transgender plunge and become ‘Lilly’. After shaking my head for several minutes, I have to admit to being mildly shocked, but I wasn’t surprised. Here’s why…

Like I said earlier, with more and more americans/global citizens being distrustful of corporations and with the elite seeing our exodus from the traditional workforce, the powers that be need to be reassured that we're kept in the ‘construct’ that the ‘Real-life’ Matrix is built on. Thus, they have to up the ante with their techniques of keeping us ‘corruptible’.

So the Wachowski’s are not only helping to mainstream homosexuality, but they and others like ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner are ushering in an era of total gender confusion. Our children are being told that they don’t have to be boys or girls. Thus, the elites are asking them to be some kind of human hybrid.

And soon the elites will have an official title for the ‘genderless’ human. This will be followed by initiatives to bait them back into the Real-Life Matrix with the promise of more access to resources via government programs that cater specifically to them.

And that’s what the Wachowski sisters and ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner are really spearheading.

So let me break this all the way down and say:

The matrix has you…

Ricardo Duchesne #fundie eurocanadian.ca

It has been established at CEC that the current portrayal of Canada as a nation populated from the beginning by peoples from diverse cultures and racial backgrounds should be seen as nothing more than an act of deception orchestrated by academics in wilful disregard of the historical evidence for the sake of legitimizing the leftist/global corporate goal of creating a race-mixed Canada against its European heritage.

The record shows, rather, that ninety percent of all immigrants who came to Canada before 1961 were from Britain, that it was only after the institutionalization of official multiculturalism in 1971 that immigrants from the Third World started to arrive in large numbers, that Canada was 96 percent ethnically European as late as 1971, and that immigration itself was not even the most important factor in Canada's population history but the high fertility rates of true born Canadian pioneers.

It has also been established at CEC that the French Canadiens were practically a new people born in the soil of New France, or within lands inside present-day Quebec, driven by the "exceptionally high" fertility rates of women, 5.6 surviving children on average, coupled with honourable patriarchal respect for women with children, the hard work and self-reliance of farmers.

In this article we will show that before the conquest, from Canada's origins up until the 1760s, immigrants played a very small role demographically in the making of Canada. Not only the Quebecois, but the Acadians as well, were a newly created people in the soil of North America. Native born Quebecois and Acadians were the main historical protagonists in the settlement of Canada for almost the first two hundred years.

Another Misleading Text about Canada's "Diverse" History

Don't you believe current historians who tell you that "New France was a multicultural society, with a considerable First Nations population and an African community". This is the message advocated by one of the most widely used texts in Canadian universities, consisting of two volumes, Origins: Canadian History to Confederation, and Destinies: Canadian History since Confederation, by R. Douglas Francis, Richard Jones, and Donald B. Smith. This very successful text, now in its seventh edition, claims that it is a major improvement over "the older texts", not only in incorporating "new historical research", but in showing that "anyone seeking to understand our diversity today must first examine the pre-Confederation era" (Origins, pp. 108, viii, fourth edition).

The two volumes seek to imprint upon students an image of Canada as "diverse" and "multicultural" from the beginning. Needless to say, Amerindians were the first inhabitants of territories that came to be identified as "Canada" only through the establishment of French and Anglo institutions during the 1600s to 1800s. But the "first peoples", the Hurons, Algonquins, Cree, Iroquois, and others, were organized in tribes spread over territories that can in no way be identified as part of "Canada" before Europeans arrived. They were territories actually contiguous with the United States rather than neatly located within Canada. Only in retrospect, through the European science of geography, have they been, and can be, demarcated in the continent of North America for pedagogical instruction, but not as actually existing tribal nations with definite geographical boundaries, since none of these tribes were organized as nations with marked boundaries.

Amerindian cultural areas

European geographers, not the Amerindians, have classified the natives of Canada in terms of six cultural areas, "Northwest Coast", "Plateau", "Plains", "Subarctic", "Arctic", and "Northeast". Indians had an intimate knowledge of the land, the soil, migration pathways of animals, weather, location of rivers, lakes, mountains, upon which the first European settlers and fur traders relied for survival. It was the Europeans, however, who mapped these territories and eventually created our modern institutions from the ground up.

It is extremely anachronistic and misleading to tell students that these tribal groups were members of a multicultural Canada. The French and English, for one, inhabited separate cultural lives, and in respect to the Natives, they inhabited totally different worlds. Their interactions with Natives are best described as interactions between separate peoples, commercial and military interactions, which affected both sides, but which essentially involved the modernizing encroachment of the Anglo-French side upon the Native cultures, leading to a situation in which, by the time of Confederation in 1867, only 1 percent of the racial population of Canada was Amerindian.

This reduction was of course tragic for the Aboriginals. But it is only by identifying them as a separate people that we can acknowledge their distinctive heritage instead of falsely assimilating them into a "multicultural Canada" as co-creators of a nation that only became multicultural in 1971 and in which, to this day, most Natives remain apart.

It is outlandish for Origins and Destinies to tell students that "in 1867" the Natives peoples were one of the three "major groups" that made up "Canada's multicultural society" (Destinies, third edition, p. 1). How can one percent of the population living in "lands reserved for Indians" — to use the official designation of the British North America Act — be identified as a "major" cultural group in Canada, equal to the French and the British, which made up 92 percent of the population?

The historians of these volumes want to have it both ways: an image of a European Canada that "decimated" the Natives through diseases, and an image of "First Nations" as co-partners in the creation of Canada's parliamentary institutions, legal system, schools and universities, churches, and modern economy. They want students to believe that the Natives were the "first peoples", followed by the French and English, as the next two "major groups", followed by the arrival of "non-British and non-French immigrants", as a fourth major group. This fourth group is portrayed as a multiracial lot, even though the statistics contradict any such picture.

The facts about the ethnic composition of immigrants, which this text cannot hide altogether, show that, at the time of Confederation, the English constituted about 60 percent of the population, the French 32 percent, and the remaining "non-British and non-French immigrants" about 8 percent. The non-British and non-French were all whites from Europe and the United States.

Origins: Canadian History to Confederation

There was no "considerable" African community in New France. The facts stated in Origins, which are the only facts that can be legitimately used, contradict this contrived interpretation: from its origins to 1759, only about 1,200 African slaves were brought to New France (p. 111). Another source says that "from 1681 to 1818 there were approximately 4100 slaves in French Canada, representing less than one per cent of the population".

The facts Origins has to rely on, since they are the only historically documented facts, contradict not only its claim that Canada was created by diverse racial groups but also the claim that the Europeans generally were "immigrants". In the case of New France (and let us not forget that the history of New France is basically the history of Canada up until 1763), the text offers a detailed table on the number of French immigrants "by decade" from 1608 to 1759, from which we learn that the total number of immigrants throughout this period was only 8,527 (p. 93). By contrast, the population of New France in 1759 was about 60,000. These numbers are consistent with the numbers I offered in The Canadiens of New France: A People Created Through the Fecundity of the Women — Not Immigration.

Since the French were the first Canadians, and the English proportion in Canada as a whole, before the Conquest of 1763, was scattered and incidental, it behooves us to conclude, on the basis of the above numbers, that immigrants played a minimal role from the time Samuel de Champlain planted the first permanent settlement at Quebec in 1608 up until 1763.

This point can be further accentuated through a consideration of the Acadians. In the calculation of the demographic history of French Canadians, the Acadians are sometimes included without a clear identification of their own demographic identity. The Acadians were another newly created people in the soil of America, not in present day Quebec, but in the maritime part of New France, or in the province of present day Nova Scotia.

The beginnings of the Acadians closely resembles that of the Quebecois; they too began as a small colony of men, or wooden buildings constructed in Port Royal in 1605 by Champlain, but these colonists were forced to return to France in 1607. In 1611, 20 new colonists, including a family, were brought back to Acadie, but this settlement failed as well.

It was only in 1651 that a demographic dynamic was set in Acadie, when about 50 families, or about 500 settlers, were brought in. After 1671, 40 more families were recruited from France, leading to a population of 800+ by 1686. By 1710, there were around 2,000 Acadians, "most of them born in North America" (J.M. Bumsted, 2003, p. 39). The text Origins likewise informs us that the "average Acadian couple usually married in their early twenties and had ten or eleven children, most of whom survived to adulthood" (p. 140).

Without any more French immigration, "the Acadian population multiplied by nearly 30 times between 1671 and 1755". By 1750, "there were more than 10,000", and "in 1755, more than 13,000 (excluding Louisbourg" (Origins, pp. 141-44). J.M. Bumsted tells us that Louisbourg's Acadian population was 3,500 in the 1750s (2011, p. 67).

The British gained control of Acadia in 1713, and in 1749 some 2500 British Americans were recruited, and then in 1750-51 about 1500 German Protestants settled at Lunenburg. This population, however, has not been counted in the above Francophone numbers. We will be writing about British immigration/birth rate patterns in a future article.

In the context of a full-scale war between France and Britain, and the refusal of the Acadians to give a formal pledge of loyalty to the British rulers in Acadia, in 1755-58 the British deported about three-quarters of the Acadian population. By 1762, they had expelled another 3000. However, in 1764, the British allowed about 3000 Acadians to resettle back in Nova Scotia, and by 1800 the Acadians numbered 4000.

It should be noted that in the 1740s there were about 700 Acadians in Prince Edward Island (PEI), then known as Île St-Jean, and categorized as part of Acadia (Nova Scotia). In 1757, approximately 2,000 Acadians had fled to PIE as refugees, which increased the population to about 4,500, but the British expelled many of these Acadians in 1758. A census of 1803 showed a population of nearly 700 in PEI. In New Brunswick, a territory carved out of former Nova Scotia in 1784, there was a population of 4,000 Acadians in 1803, a "result of high birth rates rather than the return of more exiles" (Origins, p. 153; Bumsted, 2011, p. 109).

The conclusion we must reach is quite self-evidential: the Acadians began as a small group of immigrant families, only to grow into a people with blood ties firmly set in Acadia, through a very high fertility rate, with its own unique Francophone identity, with speech patterns quite different from the Quebecois, in a very harsh environment that required the harvesting of salt from the salt marshes, the clearing of forested uplands, the building of dikes to reclaim land from the Bay of Fundy's strong tides; yet establishing themselves with a "far higher standard of living than all but the most privileged French peasants", coupled with a spirit of independence and refusal to submit to external authorities, which led to their expulsion, though not their demise, constituting today about 11,000+ in Nova Scotia, and 25,000 in New Brunswick.

The claim that Acadians were just immigrants no less different to the making of Canada than Sri Lankan Tamils, corrupt Chinese real estate millionaires, and Somalis is patently absurd, a discreditable claim that only academics who are out of touch with historical reality, and shamelessly unburdened by their traitorous attitudes towards their ancestors, would make.

Mary Kochan #fundie catholiclane.com

You whiny, sniveling, little, pusillanimous cowards. You have the audacity to tell us Christians that we are “weak” and that our religion is a “crutch.” You are supposed to be so “courageous”, venturing forth boldly into the existential mystery of being alone, facing with stoicism the nothingness that awaits you at death, priding yourself on your realism and self-reliance. You are a bunch of feeble fakers.

Yes, you are outsiders. Go start your own damn country. This one was started by Christians, you puerile dimwits. It is Christians who established and largely Christians who fought and died to maintain the freedoms you enjoy. And Christians are still the majority. Apparently your vaulted belief system doesn’t equip you to handle being in the minority. That’s interesting, isn’t it? After all, this was and is a societal situation valiantly handled by millions and millions of Christians who suffered — and currently suffer — real oppression, violence, torture, economic deprivation, and cruel deaths. But you have to go through turning off the TV once in a while and so your precious puny feelings are hurt. How delicate and frail your mental architecture is!

You are a pitiful joke. Trembling over the mere mention of God. Running like babies to court because of your brittle feelings. “Oh, but judge, but judge, I saw a cross and I just can’t stand it.” “I heard someone say ‘Merry Christmas’ and it hurt my feelings.” “I just can’t sleep knowing there is a manger scene at the courthouse.” “The sight of the Ten Commandments makes me wet my pants.” Now we see how inadequate and feeble you really are. Rage, therapists say, is the flip side of helplessness. And so we see your rage against religion in the public square for what it is: a product of your own insubstantial internal resources. Go look at yourself in the mirror if you can bear the pathetic, contemptible sight of yourself. Our merest martyr shows you to be a wimp – fourteen-year-old Kizito of Uganda singing hymns while being burned alive. But you, you anemic, lily-livered worms – you quail at pushing the off button on the remote! Hah!

Kevin MacDonald #racist caesartort.blogspot.com

[Chechar quotes white nationalist author Kevin MacDonald on Jews]

TABLE 1: CONTRASTS BETWEEN EUROPEAN AND JEWISH CULTURAL FORMS.

….......…....... …..........European Cultural Origins......Jewish Cultural Origins

Evolutionary History ...Northern Hunter-Gatherers.....Middle Old World Pastoralists
..................................................................................….............(Herders)

?Kinship System …..........Bilateral....................…..............Unilineal
…..........................................Weakly Patricentric…...............Strongly Patricentric

Family System …......…...Simple Household…..............Extended Family;
…......…......…..... .…......…......…..... .…......…......…......….…...Joint Household

Marriage Practices …...Exogamous…........................Endogamous,
…..........................................Monogamous….................Consanguineous,
…......................................................................................Polygynous

Marriage Psychology …..Companionate;…............Utilitarian; Based on Family
….........................................Based on Mutual…............Strategizing and Control of
….........................................Consent and Affection…........Kinship Group

Position of Women ….......Relatively High….....….......Relatively Low

Social Structure ….......Individualistic, ….....….......Collectivistic
…............................................ Republican ……............ Authoritarian
…............................................ Democratic….....….......Charismatic Leaders

Ethnocentrism ….......Relatively Low …..... ........... Relatively High; ….......
…............................................................................"Hyper-ethnocentrism"

Xenophobia ….......Relatively Low …....…....…......Relatively High….......
…............................................................................"Hyper-xenophobia"

Socialization ….......Stresses Independence, ….......Stresses Ingroup
…..........................................Self-Reliance…..................Identification and
…............................................................................obligations to Kinship Group

Intellectual Stance …....…....Reason;….......….......Dogmatism;
…...............................................Science…..................Charismatic Leaders
….............................................................................. (e.g., Freud, Boas);
…............................................................................Submission to Ingroup Authority

Moral Stance ….......Moral Universalism: …..............Moral Particularism:
….......….......…............…...........Morality is ….......
….......….......….......…............…Independent of…..............Ingroup/Outgroup Morality
….......….....…............….............Group Affiliation…...........("Is it good for the Jews?")


Whereas individualist cultures are biased toward separation from the wider group, individuals in collectivist societies have a strong sense of group identity and group boundaries based on genetic relatedness as a result of the greater importance of group conflict during their evolutionary history. Middle Eastern societies are characterized by anthropologists as “segmentary societies” organized into relatively impermeable, kinship-based groups (e.g., Coon 1958, 153; Eickelman 1981, 157-174). Group boundaries are often reinforced through external markers such as hair style or clothing, as Jews have often done throughout their history. [...]

[...]

Jews are at the extreme of this Middle Eastern tendency toward hyper-collectivism and hyper-ethnocentrism—a phenomenon that goes a long way toward explaining the chronic hostilities in the area. I give many examples of Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism in my trilogy and have suggested in several places that Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism is biologically based (MacDonald 1994, Ch. 8; 1998a, Ch. 1). It was noted above that individualist European cultures tend to be more open to strangers than collectivist cultures such as Judaism. In this regard, it is interesting that developmental psychologists have found unusually intense fear reactions among Israeli infants in response to strangers, while the opposite pattern is found for infants from North Germany.(14) The Israeli infants were much more likely to become “inconsolably upset” in reaction to strangers, whereas the North German infants had relatively minor reactions to strangers. The Israeli babies therefore tended to have an unusual degree of stranger anxiety, while the North German babies were the opposite—findings that fit with the hypothesis that Europeans and Jews are on opposite ends of scales of xenophobia and ethnocentrism.

I provide many examples of Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism in my trilogy on Judaism. Recently, I have been much impressed with the theme of Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism in the writings of Israel Shahak, most notably his co-authored Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel (Shahak & Mezvinsky 1999). In their examination of current Jewish fundamentalists and their influence in Israel, Shahak and Mezvinsky argue that present-day fundamentalists attempt to recreate the life of Jewish communities before the Enlightenment (i.e., prior to about 1750). During this period the great majority of Jews believed in Cabbala—Jewish mysticism. Influential Jewish scholars like Gershom Scholem ignored the obvious racialist, exclusivist material in the Cabbala by using words like “men”, “human beings”, and “cosmic” to suggest the Cabbala has a universalist message. The actual text says salvation is only for Jews, while non-Jews have “Satanic souls” (p. 58).

Andrea Widburg #racist #sexist #wingnut americanthinker.com

Black Lives Matter reveals a generation of damaged straight, white women

The Black Lives Matter movement and the subsequent riots by Antifa, the Democrat party's domestic terrorist arm, have shown Americans what leftism is — an ugly combination of social and government coercion, racism, violence, and anti-Americanism. It's also revealed that the American left has been using American blacks as a vehicle for political power without any regard for actually improving black people's lives. Instead, the left destroys their communities and doubles down on damaging policies.

What few have pointed out, though, is the way BLM protests have revealed the damage that decades of leftist messaging have visited on straight, young, white women. To set the stage, here are some videos of the hysterical young white women who keep showing up in the front row of the Black Lives Matter movement, whether screaming at police, arguing with black people, rioting, or groveling:

White woman yelling at black officers

Those videos are just a fraction of the footage showing frenzied white women taking the lead in BLM. They are deeply involved in this movement and in the ugliest way possible — and therein lies a sad tale of the leftist takeover of straight, white women.

The root problem is that these women are receiving mixed messages that would make even the strongest person go crazy. Beginning in high school, or even earlier, they're told endlessly that they're both victim and oppressor.

These mixed messages make straight white girls distinct from other students. White boys are told they're evil, toxic oppressors of both women and minorities. It's an ugly message, but a consistent one. Boys lucky enough to have countervailing influences shake it off and become the men they should be. The boys who don't have better influences, interestingly enough, become feminized, even if they're not gay, as if trying to escape that awful toxic masculinity.

Meanwhile, everyone who is non-white and/or non-straight, whether male or female, or something else, is told that he, she, or it is a victim. White privilege, racism, homophobia, transgenderism, misogyny — all of them define how non-white and/or non-straight people suffer endlessly at the hands of straight whites.

And then there are the straight, white girls. On the one hand, they're...well, white and straight. That means they are evil oppressors who have benefited unfairly from white privilege. In the morality play that is leftism, they owe the world big-time. On the other hand, they're women, which means men have victimized them from time immemorial to the present.

That relationship with men is made more toxic by the fact that the young women are told simultaneously (a) that, as liberated women, they should be part of the hook-up culture and (b) that, as biological women, they're the victims of all men's rapacious, rapey sexuality. Given these mixed messages, it's no wonder that these confused young women willingly sleep with the guy at night and then accuse him of rape in the morning. Others avoid this confusion by embracing a trendy lesbianism.

These same women are also betrayed by the leftist culture's refusal to accept that motherhood is (a) biological destiny and (b) worthy insofar as creating and raising a human being does give meaning to life.

Once upon a time, women had no life choice other than motherhood. In a pre–free market, pre-industrial world, if one ignores the infinitesimally small number of wealthy women, any search for meaning in life was overwhelmed by the endless struggle to survive. Women didn't have time to compare their lives to men, especially because the men were also fighting for survival against the untamed forces of nature and other men.

With the industrial era and the development of free-market capitalism, things changed. In the West, ordinary people had time for leisure, contemplation, and the search for meaning.

That fundamental change led to the post-industrial, pre-modern cult of motherhood. Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi, who lived in Rome in the Second Century B.C., leaped into prominence. People in the 18th and 19th centuries loved that, when catty friends asked why Cornelia wasn't wearing jewels, she pointed to her sons and said, "These are my jewels."

Today's young women are told to focus on a career. In college, though, they take liberal arts classes that don't prepare them for anything useful but do reinforce their status as both victims and oppressors. They leave college, uneducated and unskilled, which leads them to unfulfilling jobs. At those jobs, they work hard while dating frantically. When they find the right man, they get pregnant, drop out of the job market, and resent their husbands' careers. They take all the energy that was meant for their professional success and pour it into hyper-motherhood and activism. (See those raging Portland moms above.)

None of this is healthy; it is, instead, tragic. Straight white women hate themselves for being white; hate their men for being oppressors; hate their meaningless careers; and, even though they love their children, they hate the seeming meaninglessness of motherhood. This profound cognitive dissonance has finally found its most disturbing outlet in their shrill, existential screams on the streets of the Black Lives Matter protests.

cantfightnature #racist cantfightnature.tumblr.com

[Source NSFW]

Addiction and the White man’s conquest have a long history together. It was not technological superiority or the use of force that finally brought the once great civilization of China to its knees, but addiction. The slow corruption of the Asian’s own desires, bringing about the ultimate self-destruction. It was humiliating, for the Chinese people. Though they knew their reliance on opium was ruining their nation, weakening it before an inevitable British conquest, and that it was poisoning their bodies, they couldn’t help but continue to purchase and consume the toxic substance, until their wills were sapped and they were utterly defeated.
So, Asian girls, next time you suck a white cock and hate yourself, remember that you’re only fulfilling a tradition. When you try so desperately to resist the urge to submit before the White man, only to fail yourself and wind up on your knees before another conqueror, you’re following in your ancestors’ footsteps. Go ahead and try to fight it. It’s disgraceful, and demeaning. But you’re addicted. And your addiction will always win.

Henry and Joe Taylor #fundie omniology.com

image

THIS FUZZY T-REX (UPPER LEFT) IS A COMPLETELY FALSE FABRICATION!
IT IS A VISUALLY METAPHYSICAL DECEPTION, PRODUCED BY THE NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY'S "JACKALOPIAN" RECONSTRUCTIVE ARTISTS, FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CONVINCING THEIR READERS THAT THIS UNPROVABLE SILORY (SILLY THEORY) IS A FACT!!

THIS IS A DOGMATIC, RELIGIOUS AND PHILOSOPHICAL "TENET" AND NOTHING MORE. IT IS NOT A TRUE SCIENTIFIC THEORY IN THAT IT CANNOT BE FALSIFIED OR VERIFIED BY EMPIRICAL OBSERVATION.

IT IS A VIOLATION OF COMMON SENSE AND LOGIC, TWO PRINCIPLES OF LEGITIMATE SCIENCE, IN THAT ONLY TRUE BIRDS, BOTH FLYING AND FLIGHTLESS, PRODUCE DOWN THAT IS ALWAYS FOLLOWED BY OR UNDERLIES FULLY FORMED FEATHERS.

IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THIS TO BE TRUE, LISTEN TO THE WORDS OF THOMAS HUXLEY.
"Science is simply common sense at its best--that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic."

THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF OMNIOLOGY IS DEDICATED TO ACADEMIC FREEDOM IN SCIENCE, WHICH IN PART IS THE FREEDOM TO CHALLENGE THE UNIFORMITARIAN, MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY DOGMA OF SCIENTISM TODAY.

THE PRESENT ACADEMIC COMMUNITY DEFINES ACADEMIC FREEDOM AS THE UNIFORM, UNCHALLENGED ACCEPTANCE OF DOGMATIC MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY UNIFORMITARIANISM. ANY SCIENTIST OR WORLD VIEW THAT CHALLENGES THIS "UNIFYING OPINION" IS TOUTED AS A THREAT TO ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THEREFORE FORBIDDEN.

IN LIGHT OF THIS FACT, CONSIDER THIS QUOTE BY JOHN F. KENNEDY.
"The unity of freedom has never relied on uniformity of opinion."

FOR THE ACADEMIC AND JUDICIAL SYSTEMS TO FORBID THE INCLUSION OF CREATION SCIENCE IN OUR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IS NOTHING LESS THAN "INTELLECTUAL TYRANNY!"

THIS KIND OF ABUSE OF POWER IS THE VERY THING OUR FOUNDING FATHERS WARNED US WOULD HAPPEN IF "WE THE PEOPLE" LET IT. BUT "WE THE PEOPLE" DON'T HAVE TO LET IT CONTINUE IF WE'RE WILLING TO ACT ON THESE WORDS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON.
"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."

WE HOPE YOU WILL JOIN US IN THE GOOD FIGHT FOR ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND E-MAIL OUR WEB SITE TO EVERY TEACHER, STUDENT, PASTOR AND FRIEND THAT YOU CAN. TOGETHER WE CAN DEFEAT "INTELLECTUAL TYRANNY," BUT ONLY IF YOU CHOSE TO GET INVOLVED.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy truthernews.wordpress.com

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Based on breaking news and events, it appears that CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva is plotting bio-chemical or nuclear terror attack prior to President Obama leaving office on January 20, 2016. Said attack will be a “game changer” and will no doubt spark World War III.

Exactly who will be scapegoated for the impending WMD attacks is not known, but Al Qaeda, Al Nusra Front, Bundy Militia, China, Hamas, Iran, ISIS, Khorasan Group, North Korea, Pakistan, Quds Force, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and/or the Taliban re the most likely suspects. Regardless of who is ultimately blamed in the media, the nuclear terror attack was orchestrated by the CIA.

Exactly where the bio-chemical or nuclear attacks will transpire is not known, but American and Canadian cities such as Baltimore, Boston, Charlotte, Dallas, Houston, Jacksonville, Kansas City, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New Orleans, New York, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, Tampa and/or Washington, D.C. are the most likely to suffer an attack.

[...]

Dictator Barack Hussein Obama
While Barack Hussein Obama II was allegedly enrolled at Harvard Law School from 1988 to 1991, the Gulf War between the United States and Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein raged on from August 2, 1990, until February 28, 1991. Consequently, it appears that Obama was premeditatively given the middle name of “Hussein” shortly thereafter in order to foreshadow the notion that he is slated to become America’s first dictator. Similar to how dictators Adolf Hitler (1938) and Joseph Stalin (1939 & 1942) were named TIME’s “Man of the Year”, Obama was named TIME’s “Person of the Year” in both 2008 and 2012. A second look at the TIME cover reveals that the “M” in “TIME” serves as two devil’s horns on Obama’s head. The coveted award appears to be a rite of passage for CIA-spawned dictators who, at the time that they received their respective awards, had the full support of the political establishment and virtually all media (e.g., newspapers, radio, television, etc.). In other words, the status quo was fully supportive of both Hitler and Stalin prior to the wars they started and the industrial slaughter of their respective citizens. However, since their respective deaths, Hitler and Stalin have been demonized in every way, shape and form by the very governments and media which helped elevate them to dictator status in the first place. Consequently, after Obama becomes dictator of the United States and kills tens of millions under the guise of FEMA concentration camps, he too will join the ranks of Hitler and Stalin as the most notorious dictators of all time. The path to an Obama dictatorship will likely be implemented as follows: a) Obama declares a “National Emergency” in the aftermath of a foreign invasion, natural disaster or terror attack, b) due to said “National Emergency”, Obama will declare Martial Law (i.e., military law), resulting in the suspension of the rule of law as dictated by the U.S. Constitution; c) due to the ongoing “National Emergency”, the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election will first be postponed and then ultimately canceled, leading to a de facto dictatorship of the United States under President Obama; d) under the guise of the “National Emergency” and Martial Law, Obama will open FEMA concentration camps to house displaced persons as well as alleged “terrorists”, leading to the industrial slaughter of tens of millions of Americans; and e) in the aftermath of mass genocide, Obama will take his rightful place in history as the Black Adolf Hitler.

Obama Dictatorship Programming & Propaganda
Because Barack Hussein Obama II is slated to become America’s first dictator, Obama himself along with scores of CIA minions in politics and media have been speculating and salivating about the impending Obama dictatorship for years. Despite assurances that he has no intention of becoming a dictator, Obama’s speech to La Raza on July 25, 2011 (see video) suggests otherwise. Obama stated, “Now, I know some people want me to bypass Congress and change the laws on my own. And believe me, right now dealing with Congress…Believe me…Believe me, the idea of doing things on my own is very tempting. I promise you. Not just on immigration reform. But that’s not how our system works. That’s not how our democracy functions. That’s not how our Constitution is written”. In order to foreshadow the notion that he will be America’s first dictator, Obama stated on March 1, 2013, that “I am not a dictator, I’m the president” (see video). The premeditative statement by Obama was designed to intimately associate the office of President of the United States with the term “dictator” just prior to an Obama dictatorship transpiring in reality. Although there are literally thousands of reports associating Obama with the terms “dictator” and “dictatorship”, the following sample is sufficive in showing that there is coordinated effort to psychologically prepare the masses for the impending Obama dictatorship so that it will be less shocking when it transpires in real life. Aside from the aforementioned statements by Obama, the first Obama-dictator programming was identified back on November 11, 2008, when Georgia congressman Paul Brown warned of a dictatorship under Obama. Roughly 18-months later on June 16, 2010, MSNBC’s Ed Schultz called on Obama to act “like a dictator”. Roughly 18-months later on January 3, 2012, the Washington Times published an editorial entitled “Obama and Dictatorship”, which begged the question: “Can a mundane defense authorization law create an Obama dictatorship?”. Roughly 6-months later on June 18, 2012, traitorous Infowars held a “Stop Obama Dictator Contest” which was evidently designed to raise the notion of an impending Obama dictatorship just prior to its fruition in reality. Approximately 5-months later on November 7, 2012, the New York Post published a report entitled “Obama’s Historic Victory: Hail ‘O’Caesar” which depicted Obama as the notorious dictator Julius Cesare. Five days later on November 12, 2012, Bloomberg News published a report entitled “The Next Four Years” which depicted Obama as an old man just after winning the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election. Considering that Obama would not age that much in 4-years, it can be deduced that the shocking cover was designed to foreshadow the notion that Obama will be in power for decades which is only possible in America under a military dictatorship. A week later on November 19, 2012, Newsweek published a report entitled “The Obama Conquest: Lucky General or Master of the Game?” which depicted Obama as the dictator Napoleon Bonaparte. Less than a month later on December 6, 2013, the Examiner published a report entitled “Liberal Democrats to Obama: Rule Like Dictator on Minimum Wage, Deportations”, further foreshadowing Obama acting unilaterally in a dictator-like manner. Roughly 2-months later on February 20, 2014, Korn singer Jonathan Davis called President Obama a dictator who uses Miley Cyrus and Kanye West to destroy America. The latter part of the remark by Davis was designed to dismiss the seriousness of the impending Obama dictatorship. Roughly 6-weeks later on April 2, 2014, the Huffington Post published a report entitled “A Reality Check on Executive Orders and the ‘Dictator Obama’ Myth” which was evidently designed to dispel the notion of an impending Obama dictatorship. Approximately 6-months later on October 10, 2014, Jewish actress Gwyneth Paltrow stated that “It would be wonderful if we were able to give this man [Obama] all of the power that he needs to pass the things that he needs to pass”. Paltrow’s comments were designed to sell the notion that the solution to all of America’s problems is an Obama dictatorship. Roughly 3-weeks later on November 3, 2014, MSNBC published a report entitled “Obama Can be ‘Apathetic’ or a ‘Dictator’ but He Can’t be Both”, further foreshadowing that an Obama dictatorship is imminent. About 6-weeks later on January 20, 2015, the Washington Post published a report entitled “The Obama Presidency, from ‘Socialist’ to ‘Dictator’”, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that an Obama dictatorship is just a matter of time. Approximately 5-months later on June 17, 2015, the Wall Street Journal published a report entitled “Dictatorships and Obama Standards”, further associating Obama with the notion of a dictatorship. A week later on June 24, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “TPP Passes: Obama Now A Dictator”, further selling the notion that Obama is in fact a dictator. Roughly 6-weeks later on August 5, 2015, Forbes published a report entitled “Obama’s True Legacy: Propping Up Dictators”, foreshadowing that Obama’s true legacy will be his impending dictatorship. Approximately 5-weeks later on September 1, 2015, Columbus Dispatch published a report entitled “Obama a ‘Dictator,’ Says Ex-Ohio Congressman After Mount McKinley Name Change” which was designed to show that Obama is already acting in a dictatorial manner. Almost 7-weeks later on October 23, 2015, Slate published a report entitled “American Presidential Power is Not Leading to Dictatorship” which intimately associated the office of President of the United States with the notion of an impending dictatorship. Roughly 2-weeks later on November 6, 2015, Jewish radio host Michael Savage stated on his radio program that “We’re living in a dictatorship”, a naked reference to the Obama administration. Lastly, on January 3, 2016, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie stated that Obama wants to act “as if he is a dictator”, further raising the specter of an Obama dictatorship just prior to its fruition in reality. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, confirm that there is a concerted effort my CIA minions in politics and media to program America and the world for the impending dictatorship of Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama Dictatorship Legislation
In the aftermath of a so-called “National Emergency”, Barack Hussein Obama II will legally become America’s first dictator under Rex 84 (Readiness Exercise 1984) which allows for a military dictatorship of the United States. The plans for Rex 84 was first revealed by Alfonso Chardy in the July 5, 1987, edition of the Miami Herald entitled “Reagan Aides and the ‘Secret’ Government” (see above photo). In short, Rex 84 is a contingency plan developed by the U.S. federal government (at the behest of the CA) to suspend the U.S. Constitution, declare Martial Law, place military commanders in charge of state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens in FEMA concentration camps (see below) which are deemed to be “national security threats”. The term “Readiness Exercise 1984” was likely chosen because it invokes the dystopic society of perpetual war and omnipresent government surveillance foreshadowed in the book “1984” by George Orwell. The notion that Rex 84 was explicitly created for an Obama dictatorship is corroborated by the fact that Obama’s birthday is August 4th which numerologically equates to “84”. Those who would dismiss this as sheer coincidence do not understand numerology. When employing the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet) and the Roman-English alphabet, the term “Rex” (R+X) acronymically and/or consonantly speaking equates to “Rome X” or “Rome Kill”, while the numbers “84” translates to “HD” which acronymically and/or consonantly speaking equates to “Forever Die”. Consequently, the term “Rex 84” means that the Roman Empire in Greenland will be culling a large part of the U.S. population under the cover of an Obama dictatorship. Lastly, on May 4, 2007, the “White House National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 51” (NSPD-51) was passed by the U.S. Congress which allows for the “continuity of government” under Obama in the aftermath of a “catastrophic emergency”. Such an emergency is broadly defined as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions”. Should Obama determine that such a “National Emergency” has indeed occurred, he and he alone has the power to do whatever he deems necessary to ensure that “continuity of government” survives, including declaring himself dictator of the United States of America.

[...]

Obama’s Martial Law Takeover
Because Barack Hussein Obama II is slated to become America’s first dictator, there have been countless references to Martial Law which will result in the removal of all power from the previous executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. In other words, no laws will applicable except those which Obama deems necessary. In order to program America for the implementation of Martial Law in the wake of a biological pandemic, the Hollywood propaganda film entitled “World War Z” (2013) starring Brad Pitt makes a naked reference to Martial Law. The notion that Obama plans to institute Martial Law was evident surrounding JADE HELM 15, a U.S. military war game which took place in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas and Utah from July 15, 2015, until to September 15, 2015. In short, the unprecedented military drill was designed in-part to implement Martial Law on a local basis prior to it spreading nationally. Fortunately, Obama but never got the chance to implement Martial Law due to timely terror alerts from Truther.org. Nevertheless, the notion that JADE HELM 15 was cover for the implementation of Martial Law was first identified back on April 30, 2015, when Bloomberg published a report entitled “Whoa, If True: ‘Operation Jade Helm 15’ Lays Groundwork for Martial Law”. The report quoted White House press secretary Josh Earnest who stated, “In no way will the constitutional rights or civil liberties of any American citizen be infringed upon while [JADE HELM 15] is being conducted”. Translation: constitutional rights and civil liberties will be infringed upon in the aftermath of martial law. Roughly a week later on May 6, 2015, Bloomberg News published a report which revealed that the “U.S. Army is preparing for “modern-day Martial Law” in Texas. That same day, May 6, 2015, the New York Times published a report which revealed that JADE HELM 15 is “part of a secret plan to impose Martial Law”. Also on May 6, 2015, The Star published a report which stated that JADE HELM 15 is really a sinister plot by Obama to “take over the state [of Texas] and impose Martial Law”. Two days later on May 8, 2015, the Los Angeles Times published a report entitled “Operation Jade Helm 15: Military Training Exercise or Martial Law?” which revealed that the military exercise was “preparation for the imminent declaration of Martial Law”. Just over a week later on May 17, 2015, the Hartford Courant?published a report which stated that the U.S. military intends to “remove key political figures who might oppose the institution of Martial Law”. A day later on May 18, 2015, the New Yorker published a report which stated that JADE HELM is “a rehearsal for civil war and the enforcement of Martial Law”. Roughly 2-months later on July 4, 2015, the Washington Post published a report which stated that JADE HELM 15 is an Obama plot to “confiscate their guns and ultimately establish Martial Law”. Approximately a week later on July 10, 2015, Russia Today published a report which stated that “Martial Law [is] about to be declared” and that “Martial Law goes into effect this summer”. Two days later on July 12, 2015, Yahoo News published a report which stated that JADE HELM 15 will bring about an “orchestrated financial crisis [that] will lead to Martial Law”. A day later on July 13, 2015, The Guardian published a report which stated that JADE HELM 15 was “the prelude to Martial Law”. Less than 24-hours later on July 14, 2015, Russia Today published a report which stated that “Texans will be […] forced to endure Martial Law”. Lastly, during a CNN special entitled “Guns in America”, which aired internationally on January 7, 2016, Obama made a direct reference to JADE HELM, stating that “We did a military exercise in Texas, and a whole bunch of folks were sure that this was the start of Martial Law”. In response to a follow-up question by CNN host Anderson Cooper, Obama stated, “Are you suggesting that the notion that we are creating a plot to take everybody’s guns away so that we can impose Martial Law?”. The fact that Obama voluntarily spoke about Martial Law confirms, albeit in a de facto manner, that it’s just a matter of time before Martial Law implemented on a national level. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, confirm, albeit in a de facto manner, that Obama will implement Martial Law in the aftermath of a “National Emergency” that will predictably elevate Obama to dictator status.

Stephen Hicks #wingnut stephenhicks.org

From the perspective of the Germans, Napoleon was not only a foreign conqueror, he was a product of the Enlightenment. Where he conquered and ruled, he extended equality before the law, opened government offices to the middle class, and guaranteed private property. On matters of religion, he destroyed the ghettoes, gave Jews freedom of religion, and gave them the right to own land and practice all trades. He opened secular public schools, and modernized Europe’s transportation network.

Napoleon outraged many powerful forces in doing so. He abolished guilds. He angered the clergy by abolishing church courts, tithes, monasteries, convents, ecclesiastical states, and he seized much church property. He angered the nobles by abolishing feudal estates and feudal dues, by breaking up large estates, and generally by lessening the power of the nobles over the peasantry. He functioned, in effect from the Enlightenment perspective, as a benevolent dictator, as one who embraced many of the modern ideals but who used the full force of government to impose them.

His dictatorial impositions went further. He enacted censorship wherever he went, conscripted subjugated peoples to fight foreign battles, and taxed subjugated peoples to finance France.

Charles Krafft #conspiracy #dunning-kruger codoh.com

[From "To the Abattoir : Investigating the Legionary Rebellion of January 21-23, 1941"]

In 1994 I applied for and received a small grant to travel to Slovenia to collaborate with the NSK group (Neue Slowenische Kunst). This art group, which had coalesced around the band Laibach a decade earlier during a period when it was banned, had just upped the ante on their collectivism by declaring themselves a “transglobal borderless state-in-time.” They had begun issuing passports and opening temporary pop-up NSK embassies wherever IRWIN (the NSK visual artists) were invited to exhibit their paintings and graphics. I’d proposed to design a set of tableware for NSK state occasions and had flown from Seattle to Ljubljana to work on that idea there. During the course of my stay I met a fetching Slovenian woman who was teaching children’s pottery classes at the ceramics studio where I ended up. Her name was Mihaela and her name plus the serendipitous purchase of a cheesy paperback exposé of Nazis in America precipitated a mania for Romania that preoccupied me for some years to come and ultimately led to a meeting in Bucharest with Catalin Z. Codreanu, the 90-year-old youngest brother of Corneliu Z. Codreanu, the charismatic founder of the Iron Guard.

[...]

Chapter 2 of Blum’s 1977 true-crime potboiler, entitled “The Bishop and the Dentist” is a mawkish account of a Jewish Romanian-American dentist’s twenty-year letter-writing campaign to paint Bishop Trifa with the “Nazi war criminal” tar brush. Dr. Charles Kremer’s obsessive letters to US immigration officials, ambassadors, cabinet ministers, senators and congressmen eventually resulted in a government case against Trifa and his denaturalization in 1982. But Blum’s account of the flimsy hearsay evidence against Trifa ends before his deportation and death in exile in 1987. Information in the publication that same year of Securitate defector Ion Pacepa’s Red Horizons: Chronicles of a Communist Spy Chief, in which the author chronicles the Ceaucescu regime’s manufacturing of false evidence against Trifa to feed to American Jewish organizations in a successful bid to maintain Romania’s most-favored-nation trading status, was ignored by US Immigration and Naturalization Service investigators. Trifa could not be expelled just because he was a Legionary. He had to be made to look like a monster. Pacepa writes, “The framing of Trifa was a long process that followed to the letter the guidelines received from the KGB on how to go about such an operation.”

Two other books published after Trifa’s death shed additional light on the diplomatic and political ramifications of the “war criminal” persecutions and the goals they ultimately served. However, it was Gerald Bobango’s Religion and Politics: Bishop Valerian Trifa and His Times, written while he was still alive, that woke me up to Jewish exceptionalism in postwar Romanian historiography and ignited a desire to travel there. Gerald Bobango was one of Trifa’s lawyers. His book about this case is a seminal one in my life in that it ultimately led to my breaking ranks with the Gramscian slow march through the schools and institutions most Western artists have been in Leftist lockstep with since V-E Day.

[...]

Central to my research into Legionary history are the events of January 21-23, 1941, usually referred to as “the Legionary revolt of 1941” or “the Bucharest pogrom.” During these three days, we are told, the Legionaries attempted take control of the Romanian Legionary State from Marshal Ion Antonescu, with whom they were sharing power. The rebellion was actually a coup d’état begun by Antonescu when he began relieving Legionary functionaries of their various posts in city governments across the country with no warning. Bucharest’s Legionary bureaucrats and police force refused to abandon their positions and street fighting broke out.

During the resulting clash with the army the Jewish section of the city was ransacked. We have been told marauding Legionaries butchered 200 Jews in the municipal abattoir and left their bodies hanging on meathooks. In other parts of the city Jews were rounded up, robbed, raped, and tortured to death in a frenzy of looting and rapine. There are photos of the aftermath of the “revolt” and newspaper clippings attesting to all manner of depravity, but accounts of the events aren’t trustworthy and the story of the Bucharest abattoir has done more to bring disgrace on Romania’s populist Legionary Movement than any other event in the twenty-year history of its struggles with local police prefectures, the monarchy, and the army.

Wildly varying versions of this legend are repeated in most histories of the Holocaust and Romania in WWII. Evidence presented in the case against Archbishop Trifa included the text of a speech he delivered in his capacity as a Christian student leader to a group of university students on January 19. Supposedly it was an incitement to the violence which erupted the following day.

From what little I’ve been able to learn about his life, Corneliu Z. Codreanu was never a Legionary, but he was jailed after the war as a political liability and languished in Communist prisons while his academically trained artist wife did what she could to feed the family. I asked him a number of questions, including his opinion on the story of the abattoir, but his answers were in Romanian and I’ve yet to get these translated. At the time my translator told me he didn’t believe it. Everyone who has bothered to look into it agrees it’s a slander, but I doubt Mr. Codreanu knew that an American foreign correspondent named Leigh White, working for the Jewish Telegraph Agency, was the first person to report the story. White wasn’t in Bucharest when the fighting broke out. He filed his eyewitness account of the unrest from Sofia, Bulgaria, and was back in Bucharest before it was over.

[...]

After a meeting with Hitler on January 14, 1941, Marshal Antonescu returned and dissolved the short-lived National Legionary State, and Romania entered the war five months later. Jews died during the resulting coup d’état, but so did many Legionaries, soldiers, and other citizens. No one agrees on how many, but figures for the Jewish lives lost were determined by fiat in 2009, and laws were passed in Romania to discourage revisionists.

Tantum ergo #fundie forums.catholic.com

True dat.

I'm old, but not old enough to remember Nazi Germany and WW2. . .but one can't help see the parallels in 'logical thinking'.

After all, having Jews wear special clothing was LEGAL, right?
Taking them off to concentration camps was legal, right?
The government knew best, right? And hey, if some of the actions seemed a bit dicey --oh wait, they're actually putting these people to death? but. . .well, we're at war, and it's us against them, and I'm just following orders, you can't blame me for just trying to do what I'm told. . .

It all started in such a SMALL way, and such a would be HELPFUL way, you know? Germany had war damages to pay from WW1, there was a world wide recession, some of Hitler's plans for a strong unified Germany seemed just and logical and good for all the people. the 'long range' forecast was couched in such ways. . .and those little things 'along the way' were maybe not really such great things but hey, you can't make an omelet without breaking some eggs --and after all, it started out being stuff done by only a few people. in 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936 etc. you yourself might not even have noticed more than a few Jewish people in your small town, and you CERTAINLY didn't go around breaking their windows or stealing their property. You might not even have known this was going on in other places. . . and if it was, it was probably because THEY had been going around stealing, and this was only a just restitution. . .

and the lies kept spreading, and the propaganda kept growing. . .

Kind of reminds me about how we were told that abortion should be 'safe, legal, and rare', and that it was ONLY to be done in cases of incest and rape. . .

and then it was only to be done if the poor mother's 'mental health' was in danger. . .

and then it was ONLY a 'blob of tissue'

and then it was 'the woman's body'

and then it wasn't simply 'a' choice, it was the preferred choice.

The lies keep spreading and propaganda keeps growing. . .

Aysia #fundie #conspiracy acne.org

The controvery surrounding evolution is a hype which marxists and materialists feed off like the disappointing rot of decayed meat. Most poor, thick-headed sods are denied the comfort of knowing the truth because they have this innate belief that every fucking scientist is a genius. Well they're not. Scientists: they shit just like you and me, except that they have the priviledge to spout dogmatic political agendas and label it 'logic.'

S.D. Wells #conspiracy #wingnut #racist #elitist naturalnews.com

With the coronavirus pandemic comes a much easier helicopter view of three “classes” of people in the United States, based on several easily-identifiable traits, actions and mental capacity, in general. Most Americans believe that the news on television and in the newspapers is real. They don’t realize that the coverage of a local story about a person or small business is completely different than “world news” or “national news” that’s nearly, if not completely, fake. Two tiers of Americans fall for the narratives, accounting for over 200 million people nationwide.

The Neanderthals
First off are the Neanderthals. These are people who become violent when the news upsets them, and the state and federal government take full advantage of their primitive and reactionary “state of mind.” States have already started banning the sale of alcoholic beverages, guns and ammunition. The U.S. government thinks ahead and wants to get the guns and booze out of the hands of the modern-day Neanderthals that haphazardly roam the metropolitan cities of America.

Neanderthals may have cell phones and cars, but they’re still mighty primitive. If they see an opportunity to get away with crime, they’ll take it, especially in the middle of a fake-news-manufactured-crisis. They’ll steal, fight in public, engage in road rage, sexually assault and rape, and even kill.

The Sheeple
Second come the Sheeple. These are folks who think they’re informed, but they’ve got all the wrong information, fake facts, fake science, and poorly concocted yet dogmatic opinions formed off of and based on all the trickery. Big Food, Biotech, Big Pharma, TV, newspapers, shill websites, and social media have the sheeple hypnotized, dumbed down, mesmerized, confused, dazed and punch-drunk.

The Sheeple still think the Democrat politicians aren’t total communists who want to destroy the country, eliminate the middle class, and create a police state government nobody will ever escape from again. They just can’t see it. They’ll be the first ones to run out and get injected with a dangerous, experimental COVID-19 vaccine, should one “come out.”

The sheeple are people who follow each other (like the name implies for sheep or even cattle) because they can never think for themselves. They get the flu shot every year and the mercury eviscerates their central nervous system and systemic brain function. They drink fluoridated water from the tap that lowers their IQ levels drastically. They eat blood-clogging, heart-damaging canola oil daily. They take prescription medications regularly, thinking that helps them stay alive. They are sheeple. They will walk slowly right off a cliff if the rest of the herd leads them there.

The Independents
The independents are the informed. They are educated, and not specifically in that school way, but they can distinguish reality, organic food and natural medicine from the fake news, bad food and twisted medicine. These people are “street smart.” Many run their own businesses, own land, own guns, grow their own food, are fully stocked with supplies, eat mostly organic food, drink only filtered water, and understand what supplements, superfoods and tinctures help with immunity and to fuel longevity.

The independents are informed because they read independent media for news, talk to honest professionals for valid information, and know the difference between actual science and the fake stuff propagated by the CDC and the FDA.

Informed folks don’t panic or get violent when the fake news dishes out emotionally-charged propaganda. Independents don’t turn in their guns and get force-vaccinated so that some nanny-state government can take away all their constitutional rights.

The independents don’t donate their money to fake, pink-washed, “non-profit” (means for private profit) cancer drives, where the presidents and CEOs all pocket the money while promoting chemotherapy and fried chicken.

That’s why, during this COVID-19 crisis, it’s important to understand that all Democrat politicians want to crash the economy, crush all small businesses, and bankrupt America – just in the hope to vote Trump out of office in November by blaming it all on him. Get it? The CDC is in on the fix too, avoiding testing Americans for the novel coronavirus so they can pump up the death toll and scare everyone into believing Big Government will save them.

Thegoodman #racist friendlyatheist.com

The Jewish community certainly was undeserving of their punishment by the Nazi’s, but their role as a catalyst for the Nazi hatred of them could not possibly be created if the Jewish community was the lovable doctors and children often depicted in Hollywood cinema.

I don’t pretend to know much about the events leading up to WW2, but I cannot believe the Jewish community was an innocent bystander while Eastern Germany was the scapegoat of WW1. They were certainly victims, but not innocent. They just got way way more than they deserved.

Eric the Red #fundie patheos.com

[Women entered the workforce the same time men did. It started back in the earliest days of humanity.]

That's cute, but we're talking about real jobs here.

Why do feminists (and their useful idiot manginas) hate math? Do you really think that you can flood the workforce with women and have a corresponding number of job openings magically appear? Reduce demand further by having less children and the problem exacerbates itself. "But the laws of supply and demand are unfaaaaaaaaaaair!" you whine. "The answer is MOAR GUBMIT! Look, I've got an MLK quote and everything!"

HeebJesus #sexist #wingnut incels.co

[Serious] Leftism is for foids

Women are naturally more collectivist when it comes to things like gender, which is why they're so easy to dupe by Jews and also why many white women are radical feminists and leftists. However, collectivism when it comes to race is almost never seen in foids, but ESPECIALLY white ones. Nazism is an almost entirely male-dominated sport. Most "female Nazis" are only like that because their boyfriends are fash. Remember, women only follow the status quo because they're social butterflies. They would NEVER want to risk lowering themselves on the social ladder, hence why they get all those brownie points. The only exceptions to that rule are women who are just batshit insane, like Tila Tequila or Valeria Lukyanova. Only crazy women are attracted to Nazism, and that's pretty much where the list ends.

Now, I'm obviously not ripping on any leftists on here, but at the same time, it should be said that leftism is a female sport while rightism is a male sport. That's all.

Furthermore, women do not challenge the status quo. If something is popular, say ethnopluralism, multiculturalism, etc then they're going to follow it. Period.

CertifiedRabbi #racist reddit.com

I honestly don't really see the point of trying to win over non-White people. I mean, our goals are unapologetically pro-White. Ultimately, our goals are to reclaim our societies and prevent non-Whites from flooding into them again in the future. Why on Earth would non-White people support those goals when keeping the White race cucked serves their racial interests?

If you think that we can convince non-Whites to come to some kind of mutually beneficial agreement where we both go our own ways and trade with each other, then you're simply wrong and dangerously naive. They want access to our societies, and they'll beat the shit of us if we try to stop them.

We always create better societies than they do, and so their standards of living will be severely harmed if we force them to live in their own societies away from us. That's why they're always going to be trying to break into our societies, and so it's our responsibility to push them out against their will.

They're not going to shake our hands and go "Okay. You guys got your society and we have ours. That sounds fair to me!" Any attempt to prevent them from piggybacking off of our success will be violently resisted. I mean, would you want to live in fucking Africa?

There's no way in fuck that blacks are ever going to respect our desire to maintain our own societies for ourselves, or agree to set up their own independent nations. Some of the more radical black nationalists might say that they want to escape supposed White oppression and live in an all-black society, but judge them by their actions. They're always trying to force their way into "White supremacist" institutions and benefit from our tax dollars.
99.99% of black nationalists are frauds, and the other 0.01% don't know enough about race realism to realize that blacks literally aren't genetically capable of creating advanced societies. They don't really want a black ethnostate because they know that it will suck because literally all black nations suck. What they really want is more gibs from us, and for us to completely bend over for them. They might want their own black enclaves, but at the same time they want us to keep giving them more free handouts rather than pursuing a goal of true independence and black self-reliance.

To the black mindset, liberation isn't the ability to escape Whiteness and gain their independence so that they're free to organically reach their full racial potential by erecting their own societies without outside influence. Liberation is unfettered access to Whiteness where they're free to marry our women, live in our neighborhoods, attend our schools, work at our businesses, and receive massive amounts of handouts from us. It's a fundamentally different mindset from we White nationalists where we genuinely want full independence from other races.
That's why you should only focus on red-pilling other Whites. They're the only people that really matter in this struggle for White independence from non-Whites. Once we've won over a majority of White people, then it won't matter what non-White people think about our desires to keep them the fuck away from us. They'll simply be forced to leave whether they like it or not.

And try to think about it this way: do you think that it's up to you or me whether or not Japan has a right to remain Japanese? Fuck no. The Japanese don't give a fuck what we think about their immigration policies because it's their country, not ours. We as White people need to have the same mindset. Who cares what non-Whites think about our desire to prevent them from living in our societies? It's not fucking up to them. If we have to seek permission from non-Whites over whether or not it's okay to maintain our own societies for ourselves, then we've already lost the war.

Eric Trump #racist rawstory.com

Eric Trump denied reports that his father planned to revise his immigration policy, which involves mass deportations and a border wall paid for by Mexico.

“My father’s speaking about immigration all week, so I won’t steal his thunder and his fire,” Eric Trump told “Fox and Friends” on Monday morning, as Donald Trump was hurling Twitter insults at MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

“But you know, my father’s immigration plan is pretty simple,” the younger Trump said. “He wants secure borders. You have to know who’s coming into the United States of America. You can’t let people come in unchecked. We have 100 million people in this country that are out of the workforce. Right? I mean we have manufacturing jobs in this country have gone down one-third since 2000. We’re losing jobs across the board, yet people are walking in unchecked and we don’t know who they are. And they could be ISIS.”

Eric Trump said his father wanted to protect Americans and their jobs from foreigners.

“I mean, they should come first — you were born in this country, you were born here legally, you’re here legally,” Eric Trump said. “I mean, wages have been stagnant for the last 15 years and it’s because you have, you know, Syrian refugees coming in. It’s because you have, you know, thousands of people coming over the border.”

The median wage has remained relatively stagnant for decades, although some economists believe that metric is misleading, but Syrian refugees aren’t to blame.

The U.S. has admitted nearly 11,000 refugees from Syria since its civil war erupted five years ago.

“I mean, and Americans are suffering because of it, and that’s his point,” Eric Trump said. “So he’s speaking to Hispanic and Latino leaders and he’s having really amazing conversations. He’s also speaking to law enforcement, he’s speaking to border patrol. And you know he’s going formulate a really, really great plan that’s humane and ethical and that treats everybody well. But we have to solve the problem. It’s a real problem for this country.”

The younger Trump dismissed the notion that his father had changed his position on immigration.

“My father hasn’t flip-flopped on anything,” he said. “This was all the auspices of one article that came out that didn’t really — wasn’t grounded in any substance. But again, my father is giving a big speech on this on Thursday so he’ll be talking a lot about the specifics.”

Steve Amato #fundie bcbsr.com

Economics has also been influenced by the rise of feminism. Doubling the workforce halves the wages and consequently forces all women into the workforce and makes raising a family unaffordable. Debts increase due to the feminist sense of dependency rather than male self-reliance. Feminist influenced has bankrupted the country and swelled the number of welfare recipients. Feminists rely upon the government to take care of them, while non-feminists take personal responsibility for their own welfare. Feminists obsess over outward appearance - keeping up with the Jones - disregarding private debt. And then if their expectations aren't realized, they simply blame it on men

Time_Barracuda #conspiracy #transphobia reddit.com

Its not a bug– its a feature. For anyone who’s the least bit conspiracy minded this result makes perfect sense.

The sudden prominence of trans rights in leftist discourse has neatly split the left, and confirmed for many people their beliefs about the worst aspects of leftism, IE an obsession with ‘special rights’ at other’s expense, a focus on minutiae and a lockstep group-think that disallows any dissent, even at the expense of a shared reality. If I were a machiavellian conservative activist looking to create a societal trope to hobble my enemies I could hardly do better than the propagation of gender ideology in leftist circles. Its entirely possible that what we’re experiencing here is a massive psy-op– that would explain why trans rights have gone from being a minor blip on the horizon to suddenly being the central defining tenet of leftism. Trans rights is an artificial wedge issue being pushed by people and groups seeking to marginalize the left.

If you’re skeptical about this, consider how much you supported planned parenthood 5 years ago as opposed to today, and what a massive victory that change in opinion is for those who have been trying to dismantle planned parenthood for 50 years. PP’s wholehearted buy in to the trans business has alienated those who have long fought for its continued existence and it very well may not survive the inevitable (and well deserved) backlash coming down the line in the future, when people realize how many lives have been destroyed by cross sex hormones provided so casually by entities like PP. What could not be accomplished from outside has instead been accomplished from within. Its impossible for me to believe that’s an accident.

Carol Sarler #sexist dailymail.co.uk

Much as I like to trumpet the importance of a woman's right to choose all things at all times, there's one choice I simply cannot understand: the choice of an otherwise sane and healthy woman not to have children.

If a would-be mother is a singleton of 40 who decides to have a baby without a partner, I might wish she'd thought of it sooner and prepared for it better - but I understand.

If she's half of a lesbian couple who 'borrows' the wherewithal, I might cross my fingers that the child is not teased at school - but I understand. Even if she's a 66-year- old pregnant pensioner, threatening to turn motherhood into a freak show, I might (indeed, I do) think she's monstrously selfish and dangerously wrong - but again, more or less, I understand.

Yet if she says she hasn't a shred of maternal feeling in her, moreover, if she says she would prefer to concentrate on her career and that a child would only get in the way of it, then my head might acknowledge her right to do so. But my heart whispers: 'Lady, you're weird.'

It was welcome news, therefore, to discover this week that I am not alone. Research conducted over six years shows that far from bosses and colleagues always being suspicious of a working mother, the opposite is becoming true: it is the childless woman who is regarded as cold and odd.

As a result, it is these single-track careerists who are increasingly likely to be vilified, refused jobs and denied promotion because many employers believe them to lack what the study calls 'an essential humanity'. And I know exactly what they mean.

In the little hothouse of my own trade as a hack, I play a game with myself. Reading all the other female scribblers, sometimes with grudging admiration and sometimes none at all, I try to guess from their expression of their world view whether or not they are mothers.

I haven't - yet - been wrong. Now, with MPs so much in the headlines, I've extended the game and started to guess about the women among them, too.

As far as I can tell, my score is also pretty high there - even though it's just a feeling. On both sides of the political divide, as with the writers, it's not what MPs say or do, so much as how they go about it.

'Mothers bring something extra'

And if that touch of 'essential humanity' - or its absence - colours such notably tough professions, it's hardly surprising that employers are starting to notice that the same applies across the spectrum of workplaces.

Of course, we need not be silly about it.

Nobody wishes to see a female soldier in combat with a six-week-old infant in one arm and a rifle in the other.

Or a high-flier working 20-hour days while still breast-feeding. Or the mother of a small brood taking on any job of such erratic hours that she cannot promise them when or even if she'll be home.

But most jobs aren't like that - and most children don't stay babies for long.

Besides which, in my experiences both as a colleague and an employer, I have found that mothers almost always bring something extra to the job, to the benefit of all.

It's not the mothers, for a start, who are going to turn up late and hungover after a night on the razz; they'll have been up, dressed and alert for hours, having cooked a family breakfast and delivered their children to school. On time.

It's not the mothers, usually, who run the office bitch-fest.

They're not there to compete for the attentions of the male executives; they're there to get out of the house; they're there because they genuinely enjoy some adult company; and they're there because they have mouths to feed other than their own and shoes to buy for someone else's feet.

Two-thirds of working mothers, a recent survey found, could not provide for the children they love in the manner they would wish if they lost their jobs. So there's incentive for you.

They will, it is true, snatch time off for poorly children and Christmas carol services. And it's true they will insist that, in return for arriving on the dot of 9am, they must also leave on the dot of 5pm.

But rarely have I encountered a mother who did not offer to make up time lost, often in lunch hours. As for leaving on time, put enough mothers together in one workplace and you'll get rid of the ghastly ethos of 'presenteeism', whereby people vie for plaudits based solely on how late - albeit often uselessly - they hang around the office.

The prioritising that may baffle other people is a cinch for a woman who has spent years juggling a household. Negotiating skills? A request for 10 per cent off an overdue invoice is nothing to a woman who has had to broker a deal on Britain's Got Talent versus bedtime.

When it comes to emergencies, if you have run all the way to a clinic with a terrified toddler vomiting down your neck then, trust me, a package delayed in transit is a piece of cake. And if those are the tangibles, the intangibles - the 'essential humanity' - are more important still.

You cannot be a mother without knowing something about selflessness, compassion, generosity, commitment, fierce loyalty and plain hard work. You cannot - surely - be a boss and not value assets such as those in your staff.

Nor is it the boss who pays the price for the extras a mother brings with her; she's the one who pays for that. Enough reams have been written about the long hours of slog it takes to run a home and hold down a job at the same time. Yet still we keep doing it because we want our work, our independence and our money.

But, more than all the things we want, we actually need our children; they complete us as women, they are our light and our love and our legacy.

We feel desperately sorry for those who yearn for children they cannot have; the unwilling barren, if you will. But when we meet a woman who chooses her childlessness in the belief that there is something out there worth more, we smile politely even while - once again - our guts whisper: 'Lady, you're weird.'

So three cheers for the employers who are catching on, the ones who don't want to people their workforces with the cold, the calculating, the sad and the mad. The only question is: what took you so long?

Atavisionary #conspiracy atavisionary.com

" When I was an SJW Leftist I experienced a feeling a perverse glee at the deaths of Antonin Scalia, Andrew Breitbart, and others. Leftism creates a sort of bloodlust in its adherents and I’m happy to be free of it!

I’m no spring chicken… I’m in my mid-thirties and I’d been a leftist for my entire adult life. I voted for Gore, Kerry, Obama x2, and I was prepared to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016. But something happened. The leftist house of cards fell very quickly for me…and boy, am I glad it did.

I am reading Brietbart’s autobiography right now and I was able to recall the absolute GLEE I felt when this man died… at 43, leaving a wife and four children behind. I wasn’t troubled by this reaction at all at the time. My ideology had stripped him of his humanity and made him a subhuman creature whose extinction was meant to be celebrated. He wasn’t the only one either… I recall similar feelings when Antonin Scalia died, for example.

I’m so happy to be free of the oppressive, dehumanizing cult that is progressive thought. It’s fantastic to be able to celebrate life in all of its forms now!

If you had told me that some loud-mouthed billionaire reality star would have been the impetus I needed to re-examine the way I had seen the political world for two decades… I’d have told you that you were crazy!"

Leftism is a violent cult. Its adherents suffer from a mind virus which destroys rational and reasonable thought. They want you dead, and would happily celebrate your death by pissing on your corpse. However, it isn’t impossible to reduce or remove this mind virus thus converting a dangerous and destructive cultist back into a thinking human being. We should try to generate instances of this solution as much as possible. We can thank Trump for steering people in the right direction, even if he doesn’t go as far as we would prefer.

Also keep in mind that Breitbart was in all likelihood killed for his attempts to expose child abuse and pedophilia among the governing elite years before pizzagate became common knowledge. He knew John Podesta was the prince of pedos all the way back in 2011. Given what is otherwise known thanks to wikileaks, there is also good reason to suspect that the Podesta brothers were involved in the 2007 disappearance of Madeleine McCann, a very young girl.

NaziMan12 #racist josministries.prophpbb.com

Non-Satanists are disliked by Satan. Non-Satanists have been the cause of billions of lives lost due to their shifting away of the truth through out their whole lives. Who has served the jew in their countless wars? Who massacred the pagan aristocracy of Rome that gave way to the Jewish empire that continues to run to this day? Non-Satanists. They are scum and the worst of them are savages. Looking at the many non-satanists who have been tramped over by the jews is a common cause of doubt of this principle of Satanism.

Any mirage of a Non-Satanic enmity only arises from the Non-Satanists personal interest, which is why you see their efforts are always futile and in vain. A Satanist should re-read that explanation so as to get a thorough understanding of what a Non-Satanist is. Compare the achievements of Napoleon against Hitlers and you will see what a Satanist is capable of doing to the ARCH ENEMY and Tribal enemy of the White race the jews and what a Non-Satanic huckster does.

Anonymous #fundie evolutionblog.blogspot.com

It's apparent you're not a scientist. The fairy tale of evolutionism is a stark reminder of how scientist have duped the arrogant atheist into a dogmatic approach to reinforce his pseudo intellectualism. If you haven't figured out by now that evolution was nothing more than a concoction of scientific terms and related stories to describe bones that they absolutely have no idea about, you're a fool! Stephen Jay Gould attempted to appease the hypothesis with the Punctated Equibrium theory. A last ditch effort to restore the fictious rhetoric into a truth. Read the book as a critic with an open mind and you will see that it is pathetic to call it scientific or credible. In my opinion. Gould and rest of the story tellers degree's are worthless. Evolution never happen.It only happen in man's vain mind. So go ahead and show your outrage towards the Creationist. That doesn't change the scientific facts at all. It did NOT ever occur! Scientism is alive and well in the religious community of the atheist. Good day.James

Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

If you are serious about pleasing God in life, you need to discard this ridiculous notion of self-help. While people say you are a powerhouse of potential who just needs to learn how to flip on your own switch, God says you’re an impotent dot of a creature who can’t do bumpkus without Him. Self-help encourages a mentality of self-reliance and autonomy. Such a focus is going to lead you far astray from where you need to be.

The truth is that you don’t get any say about how sweet your experience of this world will be. God is the One calling the shots in your life whether you acknowledge Him or not. He is the One controlling your circumstances, health, and overall comfort. God says that the only choice you really have is in deciding how much you’re going to submit to Him in life. He doesn’t make any promises that if you submit to Him, He’ll respond by making your life one big bowl of pitted cherries. God isn’t into this tit for tat game that we humans are so fond of. He doesn’t say, “If you toss five bucks into the offering plate Sunday morning, I’ll respond by giving you $500.” He says, “I’m the King. I give commands, not suggestions. If you defy Me, I’m going to make you very sorry.”

Susan Anne White #fundie independent.ie

An election candidate who wants rock music banned, gay people jailed and feminism abolished has rejected claims she is extreme.

Susan Anne White, who caused a stir when she stood in last year's council elections, is now aiming to become MP for West Tyrone.

The devout Christian says her campaign will focus on moral issues including society's "dangerous" homosexual agenda.

She also wants to outlaw rock music, saying it fuels sexual anarchy and drug use.

Speaking to the Belfast Telegraph, Mrs White, who is standing as an Independent, denied that her views were extreme.

"I don't consider myself extreme - not at all," she said. "It is society that has moved. Not so far in the past, most people would have shared my views.

"My views only seem extreme because society has moved away from God's principles."

Mrs White, who is from Trillick in Co Tyrone, is one of nine candidates standing in West Tyrone on May 7.

The outgoing Sinn Fein MP, Pat Doherty, has a comfortable 10,000-plus majority. Last May, Mrs White stood for the new Fermanagh and Omagh Council, receiving just 67 first preference votes.

Mrs White said she opposes feminism "with all her might", and says it is to blame for the recession.

"Feminism is responsible for many of the social ills we see all around us," she added.

"They [feminists] are responsible for the economy - they destroyed the whole concept of a family wage with the father as the bread-winner and the stay-at-home mother. They make women feel they have to be out in the workforce."

Mrs White is also "absolutely opposed to the homosexual agenda" in today's society. If I had the power, I would certainly re-criminalise homosexuality, along with adultery," she added.

She said anyone involved in homosexual or adulterous practices should be jailed.

"I would stop the funding of gay pride parades and other depraved art and cultural events," she added.

Despite her strong views, Mrs White claims she is a "true friend" to the gay community.

"I tell them the truth," she added. "The person who is not a friend, the person who is the enemy to the homosexual is the person who pats them on the back and says their lifestyle is perfectly normal and acceptable."

While campaigning last year, Mrs White spoke out about rock music, saying acts like Iron Maiden and Kurt Cobain promoted anarchy in society. She said she remained opposed to these and other "vulgar acts".

"A lot of rock music is dangerous for the hearing," she added.

"That is not the only problem with it. There is an ideology which permeates rock music and it is sexual anarchy. It is also linked to drugs." She said rock music had "a terrible effect" on young people.

Mrs White blames the EU for much of society's "decadence", saying she would withdraw from Europe "tomorrow".

She admits it will take a miracle to top the poll, adding: "I believe in a God who can work miracles but, realistically speaking, I don't think I will win.

"My concern is not so much with winning, it is with trying, and to try is not to fail. In standing I have a wider platform than I would if I did not stand, and many people will hear the Biblical message and principles."

Susan Anne White on:

Homosexuality: "If I had the power, I would certainly re-criminalise homosexuality, along with adultery"

Rock music: "There is an ideology which permeates rock music and it is sexual anarchy. It is also linked to drugs."

Feminists: "They are responsible for the economy - they destroyed the whole concept of a family wage with the father as the bread-winner and the stay-at-home mother."

Europe: "I would withdraw tomorrow."

Her views: "It just takes one person to articulate what others are thinking."

Venus de Smilo #racist freeconservatives.com

[From a thread titled "Scumbags that need killing", the following are posts from FreeConservatives.com members demonstrating the gamut of bigotry, racism, hate, and hypocrisy as they discuss the looting situation after Hurricane Katrina. Not for the faint of heart.]

[On poor people being unable to evacuate New Orleans]

Being poor doesn't mean you're not responsible for yourself and your family. It doesn't make you automatically dependent. As for the race issue, the fact that they're about 95% black speaks volumes. They've shown that they don't have what it takes to be Americans of independence and self-reliance, and we've never seen a better example of how they make their own situations worse because of attitude, laziness and lack of pride. [...]

I think a lot of them decided to stay because it was easier than taking the initiative to care for their own health and safety, so they just ignored the evacuation directives. As in any population, only a few are truly unable to care for themselves to some extent. The rest are just soft, dumb and weak.

Bryan Fischer #fundie barbwire.com

[On New York City's linguistic diversity and the problems it raises]

One of the forms God’s judgment takes is a confusion of languages. According to Genesis 11, when a monolingual people became consumed with pride and arrogance, and intended to “make a name for (themselves)” by “building a tower with its top in the heavens,” God intervened by making it impossible for them to communicate with each other.

[...]

Their ability to collaborate together for evil purposes was broken by a babble of languages, and they soon scattered. Their plans, because they were not aligned with God’s, came to nought.

The lesson here may be that, when a nation turns from the humble worship of the true and living God to hubristic self-reliance, God may judge that nation by making linguistic communication impossible.

Bottom line: God may not need to judge American by confusing our language. We’re doing a pretty good job of that all by ourselves. Or perhaps, this is the way a sovereign God is bringing his judgment on a land that has turned its back on him.

Chairman #racist ronatvan.com

Facts About

Whites also known as Aryans, Caucasoid, Caucasians, Europeans, Christians, Crackers, Honkies, Honkey

-They conquered vast lands, travelled to Asia, discovered North America, South America and Australia,

-They are pure of heart and loyal,

-They are beautiful in physical aspect,

-Their only rivals are jews or asians, others simply can't compete with whites,

-The White race is the only race with diversity of colour. Blonde hair, red hair, brown hair, black hair, blue eyes, red eyes, brown eyes, all in one race. This always rouse the envy of other races who always tried to imitate whites by dying their hair or wearing contact lens,

-The White race is highly intelligent and possesses a unique gift of creation,

-The White race has crossed seas, harnessed rivers, carved mountains, tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren ice fields,

-It has been responsible for the invention of the printing press, cement, the harnessing of electricity, flight, rocketry, astronomy, the submarine, the telescope, the eye glasses, space travel, firearms, the transistor, radio, television, the telephone, the light bulb, photography, motion pictures, the phonograph, the electric battery, the automobile, the steam engine, railroad transportation, the motorcycle, the bike, the microscope, computers, robots and millions of other technological miracles. It has discovered countless medical advances, different types of architecture or written languages, incredible applications, scientific progress, mathematics, physics, chemistry, astronomy, biology, etc,

-Its members have included such greats as Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Tacitus, Julius Caesar, Napoleon, William the Conqueror, Marco Polo, Washington, Jefferson, Hitler, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Magellan, Columbus, Cabot, Edison, Graham Bell, Pasteur, Leeuwenhoek, Mendel, Darwin, Newton, Galileo, Watt, Ford, Luther, DaVinci, Poe, Tennyson, and thousands upon thousands of other notable achievers.

The Deuce #fundie scifiwright.com

Leftism is all about tearing down civilization (particularly Western Christian civilization – the highest form), and not about any of the other crap they like to pretend they’re about. To that end, they’ll use whatever tools are most effective, and will come up with less evil-sounding rationalizations for their actions afterwards.

Hence, they’re in favor of using the state to destroy gender roles and glorify the sodomy because they wish to tear down the family and do away with familial love, because those things form the backbone of civilization and are the greatest obstacle to absolute to peoples’ absolute loyalty to the state, and hence to further destruction of civilization by the state.

The idea that they do these things out of dedication to the dignity and well-being of women and individuals with same-sex attraction is just their after-the-fact excuse to justify it.

Hence, there’s no inconsistency in their actions when they support Muslim jihadists. There’s nothing inconsistent about attacking civilization by denigrating and tearing down families, while simultaneously attacking civilization by promoting savages who would terrorize it with mass murder and who hate the human rights upon which it is founded.

There’s an inconsistency in their *stated excuses* to be sure. It is indeed inconsistent to claim that women and homosexuals are victims who need to be protected and given special promotion to make things “equal,” and also that woman-and-gay-hating Muslims are victims who need to be protected and promoted to make things right.

But that just means that the lies they tell contradict each other, not that their *real* motives and reasons are inconsistent. And since the justifications they give for their actions are merely a smokescreen, you can’t shame their consciences by pointing out how they have betrayed the “principles” they merely pretended to have. They are, in fact, VERY consistent in tearing down civilization and lying about it.

Leftists’ behavior only makes sense when you come to realize that the entire ideology boils down to hatred of truth and resentment of reality.

Various incels #sexist incels.co

(what is the female sex drive?)

(Animecel2D)
Seeing a chad

(LordDylan)
Feeling dominated by chad, foids are so shallow they all have the same preference.

(Napoleon de Geso)
Femoid sex drive is outdated, they choose primitive chad instead of evolved gracile man like Elliot

(Hikikomori)
I'm not sure that it matters, we're incels and will never pleasure them anyway.

(CrookedOzCel)
They want low inhib thugmaxxed gigachad to beat the shit out of them

(Macrocephalus)
Being treated like a piece of meat by a very good looking man

Incel Wiki #fundie wiki.incels.info

Heightpill

The heightpill is one of the most important phenomena in looks theory. Originating from the biologically needs of femoids, it concludes that manlets (men under 5 foot 10) are heavily disadvantaged in dating unless they’re at least Chads or have high status. For the depraved female species, the manlet cutoff might as well be under 6 foot even, thanks to hypergamy.

Origins

From the evolutionary psychological overview, foids would want a tall man because they’ll think “he’ll be stronger and better able to ward off physical treats to his family” [1]. While in modern society this might not necessarily be true, we all know that the natural instincts of women are still prevalent in their mating choices. No matter how much manlets gymcel, they’ll always be viewed as “overcompensating” wimps with a napoleon complex. It never even began for them!

Tallfaggot advantage in online dating

Stating your height in an online dating could fuck you over badly if you’re a manlet. According to a particular dating app, firstmet, the ideal height related to most matches in males was 6’2” Specifically, they said:

“A man who is 6’2? is 17% more likely to be contacted than a man of average height (5’8?) and 57% more likely to be contacted than a man under 5’5” “ [2].
Female reaction to manlets on social media[edit]

This thread on incels.me perfectly summarized how foids react when they see manlets, even the hot ones.

https://incels.me/threads/its-over-if-youre-a-manlet-sub6-in-2018.51422/

The twitter account (https://mobile.twitter.com/heightismxposed?lang=en) commonly showed how judge mental women are toward manlets, even being distrustful of their personality or intentions just because they’re vertically disadvantaged.

FHO’s don’t even see us as worthy of any respect.

image

Manlet disadvantage in dating and even betabuxxing

A marriage is more likely to be successful if the male partner is tall. Women just feel happier about it. Several studies in Asia completely proved this hypothesis [3][4]. If even in not quite hypergamous nations manlets are screwed, then image the horror they have to face in western nations.

A Dutch case

Normies commonly suggest that Europeans, especially the Dutch, became tall due to external factors such as a great supply of nutrients. As we delve deep into evolutionary psychology, we find out that the main reason as to why Dutch men are tall these days is because short Dutch men barely even reproduced. A study which analyzed the number of kids received by men of different heights in the Netherlands concluded that:

“Our results suggest that... taller men have higher fertility compared with shorter men. It therefore seems plausible to suggest that natural selection may have acted on the Dutch population, and helped drive the Dutch toward taller heights” [5].

Rome Viharo #conspiracy skeptiko.com

[Interview with social media expert and Wikipedia critic, Rome Viharo exposes cyber bullying tactics employed by dogmatic Skeptics on Wikipedia.]

Rome Viharo: Personally I have no interest in promoting Rupert Sheldrake’s ideas or his hypotheses and I really can’t say scientifically if they’re valid or invalid. That was never my argument. My arguments were always on what’s called the “lead section,” which is just describing the basic information about the man. Rupert Sheldrake is a biologist, author, and lecturer.

I was offended because these editors were basically abusing the metadata, the first sentence of the paragraph, to immediately frame Rupert Sheldrake in a light that is just biographically not true but in a way where he has no credibility after the first sentence.

So when I joined the page, what I found offensive was “Rupert Sheldrake is a former biologist,” right? So I just found that offensive and I was like, “Where is the source that he’s a former biologist? Where is the evidence of this?” So all I was trying to do was really just change the lead section. There are so many scientific publications that refer to him as a biologist.

Alex Tsakiris: Well, it’s absurd. He has dozens and dozens of scholarly, peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals. I think he’s published in Nature, if I remember correctly.

Take line two from the Wikipedia entry. It’s just unbelievable. “From 1967 to 1973 he was a biochemist and cell biologist at Cambridge University.” Well, what happened after that? He stopped being a biochemist? He’s not being a biologist? It’s just absurd.

Rome Viharo: It’s like something from a Monty Python movie.

Matt Barber #fundie barbwire.com

The Magical Land of Progressitopia

There once was a land, a magical land, with a chicken in every pot. And in this land, which was called Progressitopia, there were two peoples. There were those who saw the world as it was, and there were those who saw the world as they oh-so-very-much wished it could be. The former were called the Trads, and the latter, the Progs. It was the Progs who held dominion over this great land, and so it was they who wrote, or re-wrote, her history.

Now, in this kingdom we must remember that Christianity, or “Christianism” as it would later be called (long since forbidden), along with similar such mythological and dogmatic phantasms, remained the foremost, if not the sole, thorn in the Progs’ collectivist butt. Any and all thought or practice that might, in any way, undermine full realization of, and strict adherence to, progressive thinking was, therefore, strictly verboten.

In fact, the Trads, the traditionalist remnant, had proven singularly responsible for the famines, Civil War II and Progressitopia’s endlessly spiraling state of affairs, both foreign and domestic – a state that, notwithstanding all predictions to the contrary, somehow became significantly and enigmatically worse subsequent to the onset of progressive governance.

There was, however, one exception to this rule: Islam. Shadowing the glorious dawn of progressive reign came, from o’er the sea, a mighty and fearsome caliphate. The Muslim faith spread like wildfire. Recruitment efforts were buoyed, and appreciably so, in that, while yet a loving and peaceful religion, any skeptic or “infidel” who failed to convert was either immediately raped and enslaved or summarily beheaded, stoned, shot or blown limb-from-limb.

Whereas Progressitopians, with their one-child-only abortion mandate, stopped reproducing altogether, adherents to the religion of peace rutted like rabbits. Every corner of the globe became thickly populated by devotees of the most praised Prophet Muhammad – peace be upon him.

As global violence and jihad spiked, it seemed for a time that Progressitopia and the Islamic caliphate would be one another’s undoing.

And then something extraordinary happened.

The King of Progressitopia, a brave and handsome man most wise, with visor of gold and scepter of 3-iron in hand, bowed before the great caliph and presented a series of official mea culpas on behalf of his land. He prayed Allah’s forgiveness for incurring his wrath – just desserts for centuries of Progressitopian Imperialism.

And so these two seemingly incompatible kingdoms, with wholly polarized worldviews, agreed to forge an incongruous socio-political partnership – an “Islamo-Progressive Alliance.” The alliance was built upon the maxim: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” The common enemy, of course, had formed its own unholy alliance: the “Zio-Christian Axis of Evil.”

And so it soon came to pass that independent Islamic settlements cropped-up throughout Progressitopia. The Michganistan Territory became, for all intents and purposes, Mecca to the Western Hemisphere.

Presently, the Islamo-Progressive Alliance found itself enjoying a comparatively peaceful seven-year truce. Apart from a weekly handful of suicide bombings, mass shootings and random beheadings, carried out chiefly against Progressitopia’s women and children, things were simply capital.

But then, trouble in paradise – economic turmoil. Toward the middle of the new millennium’s third decade, Progressitopia’s national debt ballooned to over 60 trillion. For many years, Trad economists and “debt alarmists” had warned that Progressitopia’s skyrocketing debt and deficits were unsustainable. These anti-progressive thinkers openly questioned the progressive strategy of taxing and spending one’s way to prosperity.

They felt, irrationally so, that such approach represented, as one provocative naysayer phrased it, “an epically stupid and patently impossible self-contradiction. No more can one spend his way out of debt than can he cheat his way out of adultery.”

Another fundamentalist cynic offered a less hurtful, yet no less sensationalist analogy: “When a bridge’s infrastructure becomes unsustainable,” he alleged, “it will ultimately collapse if its integrity is compromised to the degree that it can no longer support some burgeoning mass. So too it goes, apparently, as relates integrity to politicians, governments and national debt.”

Right-wing propaganda aside, Progressitopia’s economy did, nonetheless, unexpectedly collapse for reasons ultimately deemed inconclusive.

Now, as heretofore told, and as go the history books, Christianism had, from time immemorial, been the very bane of free-thinking humanity’s existence. This hateful mythology had been largely to blame, in concert with its sister-faith, Judaism, and its insufferable cousin, conservatism, an equally curious mental disorder, for all of the world’s wars, slavery, racism, sexism, disease, capitalism, global warming and, most onerously perhaps, gluten sensitivity.

Moreover, both Christianism and conservatism were ultimately determined to have been the catalyst for the systemic phobia outbreak that inexplicably began around the turn of the century. First there was homophobia, an irrational, chronic and debilitating fear of the square-hole-round-peg people, or, as this flamboyant troupe, so enamored with acronymic wordplay, preferred to be called: the “SHRP community.” Since SHRPs displayed impeccable fashion sense and a flair for the fabulous, Neanderthalic Trads were, most naturally, terrified by them.

Then came Islamophobia, the irrational fear of having one’s head lopped off, followed by transphobia, the fear of naked men in ladies’ locker rooms, polyphobia, the fear of communal rompathons, as well as an all-inclusive litany of other phobias relating to myriad sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions.

Next, there emerged the great progressiphobia pandemic of ’27. This involved an equally absurd, though no less universal, fear of progressive thought, practice or people. This, for a time, threatened to halt Progressitopia’s progressing progress altogether.

Finally, there occurred a worldwide outbreak of phobia-phobia. This was, of course, a condition delineated by the once again irrational denial that any of the aforementioned phobias had “any basis in reality whatsoever,” but, rather, were “simply ham-fisted pejoratives intended to marginalize one’s political opposition.”

But, alas, we must for now part ways. My gluten-free frittata grows cold.

Irish Crusade #racist stormfront.org

I Don't Consider Jews Human

They have no sense in invention, self-reliance, independence, Anne Frankly their Survival Skills are lessons on how to argue (Lie) and deal with money (Scam).

They have been expelled from nations over the centuries for a reason; they're a poisonous race of inbreded creatures that thrive on other civilizations in order to live.

Nonetheless, they are leeches. They are anything BUT humans.

Eric Crowley #sexist returnofkings.com

WHY PATRIARCHY IS THE GREATEST SOCIAL SYSTEM EVER CREATED

In the feminist creation myth, patriarchy is original sin. It is the Lucifer from which all evils flow. Without patriarchy, we would all live in a genderless role-less feminist garden of Eden.

However, just as the name Lucifer actually means light-bringer, patriarchy is actually an enlightening influence which has brought humanity out of the mud into civilization. Feminism only exists in the shadow of the massive abundance produced by patriarchy. Patriarchy is not the enemy. Patriarchy is the greatest social system ever created.

soarfrank

The Myth of Patriarchy
Feminists ascribe all social ills to patriarchy. Like a medieval inquisitor looking for evidence of the devil, patriarchy’s influence is supposedly all around us – our media, our schools, and even our most intimate relationships. Patriarchy is responsible for domestic violence, lost promotions, mean comments on twitter – even women’s own feeling about themselves.

Anyone who doesn’t subscribe to feminist dogma is believed to be possessed by the influence of patriarchy and in need of exorcism by an ordained Priest of the Cathedral of gender studies theory. They are forced to renounce their views, or face excommunication from the public sphere. In more honest times, the dominant religion simply called freethinkers “heretics” and burned them at the stake.

Origins Of Patriarchy
In reality, there is nothing so mysterious about patriarchy. Patriarchy is a division of social roles based in natural biological gender differences.

Males and females have very obvious self-evident biological differences. Women can have babies. Men cannot. Women’s bodies are designed for nurturing, with wombs, breasts, and hormonal cycles. During pregnancy, women are unable to physically exert themselves. Men’s bodies are designed for physical exertion, and as a whole, physically stronger.

Imagine you are part of a small tribe in a survival situation. Conquest, war, famine, death – any of the four horsemen could strike at any moment. How would you divide social roles?

As Jack Donovan states in The Way of Men:

Because your group is struggling to survive, every choice matters. If you give the wrong person the wrong job, that person could die, you could die, another person could die, or you could all die. Because of the differences between the sexes, the best person for jobs that involve exploring, hunting, fighting, building, or defending is usually going to be male. This is not some arbitrary cultural prejudice; it is the kind of vital strategic determination you need to keep your group alive.

frank_frazetta_tarzanandtheantmen-smaller

In other words, traditional roles are the basis of our survival as a species.

The Sacrifice Of Men
In patriarchy, men sacrifice their energy, their time, and sometimes even their lives for the betterment of women and children, and women give themselves to nurturing children and families.

Feminists define patriarchy as a system of dominance, in which men oppress women. This redefines men’s sacrifice as an act of control, rather than love. Many men are perfectly happy to have sex with women without offering any protection or value to the woman or her resulting children. It is an act of love that men willingly give up their freedom in order to provide for women, and their young.

Patriarchy is about love. It is about the love of human beings in families, tribes, and small communities working interdependently for the benefit of one another.

Feminism Was Created By Capitalism
Feminism in it’s modern form began in the last hundred years, when industrialization moved our economic survival from requiring hard labor to requiring skilled labor. Work used to require hours of physical lifting, now it requires sitting at a desk. This transition made it possible for even the weakest women to work.

Employees are much easier to manage as interchangeable cogs than as gendered individuals with unique needs. In fact, convincing women to work doubles the size of the work force, allowing employers to half everyone’s wages. It’s simple supply and demand. As the book Revolution From Above chronicles, early feminist movements – even Marxist feminists – were bankrolled by major capitalists in order to increase the workforce and lower wages.

CapitalismAndTheExploitationOfWomen

Feminism is a product of capitalism. The “you can have it all” message is an attempt by corporations to swindle women out of their biological needs. If you’re a feminist, you’re a capitalist, because you’ve make work a greater priority than community, children, or love.

In families, each member is irreplaceable, but in a company everyone is replaceable. In patriarchy, women toiled for one man who loved her and the children he gave her. In capitalism, women work for many men completely indifferent to her and willing to disposes of her the moment cheaper labor appears.

Feminism Commodifies Relationships
In patriarchy, selfish relationship impulses were restrained. In capitalism, they are encouraged. Each member of a tribe of community works for the benefit of those around him, but in capitalism men and women are independent agents, with no loyalty or duty to anyone else.

Roles that were traditionally played by family are now outsourced. Group homes for the elderly, day care for the children. Even mentors and friends can be bought in the form of therapists and life coaches.

This system destroys intimate relationships. It selfishly benefits a woman to bear the children of strong lone alpha’s rather than the man providing for her. It selfishly benefits a man to impregnate every available fertile woman with no intention of further contact. Alpha fucks, beta bucks.

Feminism has created a war between the sexes with each side trying to maximize their profits in the sexual marketplace while spending as little as possible. We’re all little atomized corporations united only by the laws of bio-mechanics.

steinberg_war-of-the-roses

Men Have Lost Reason To Work
This new dynamic has freed men from work. In his new book Bachelor Pad Economics, Aaron Clarey advocates a minimalist approach to money – buy only what your need and using your time for your benefit rather than a corporation’s. This approach is already being taken as men drop out of the system, earn less than women, and avoid higher eduction.

The reason men worked hard was to provide for their families. Men didn’t work long hours out of self-interest. They did so out of love. Most men can subsist on very little. It’s been said that civilization was created to impress the opposite gender. Without reward, there is no reason to work. No carrot, no jump.

As a society, we’ve reached a point where technology has eliminated the need for everyone to work. Just as capitalism freed women from their natural role, it’s freed men from theirs. Masculinity has been reduced to a fashion statement.

Return To The Natural Order
While we understand that animals exists in natural groups – a herd, a flock, a pack – we forget that man is an animal too. Man’s natural group is the tribe. Humans are mammals. We learn through relationships, rather than instinct.

Ajna-Nursing-Acorn-Community-Virginia-2006-650x486

Children require love, attachment, and stability that can only be found in emotional bonds with present adults. They are not interchangeable cogs. You can’t buy a mother’s love or a father’s wisdom. Love cannot be outsourced. Authentic love is only possible within patriarchal community.

To a company, non-working children are a nuisance. The epidemic of single motherhood, plummeting birthrates, and mental illness is due to the rejection of traditional roles. If society wants healthy happy children and loving stable communities, it must embrace the lost values of patriarchy.

In the early tribes, humans were entirely dependent on one another. Now they are independent and unsatisfied. Returning to traditional roles means living interdependently, and align with the natural order not because we have to, but because we choose to. We could exist alone, but we are fulfilled together.

Of course, feminists will call this oppressive. They want you to be free – free from community, free from belonging, free from love. A mass of apes fighting over the highest value mate behind a gilded cage.

ffleft

Back to the mud, or back to the kitchen, the choice is yours.

Nurettin Canikli #conspiracy bbc.com

Turkey says Pope Francis' description of the WW1 mass killing of Armenians as genocide shows "the mentality of the Crusades".

The pontiff's remarks have "no relation to reality", Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Nurettin Canikli said.

Armenia and many historians say up to 1.5 million Armenian Christians were killed by Ottoman Turkish forces in 1915.

But Turkey disputes the figure and denies the deaths constituted genocide.

It says the deaths were part of a civil conflict triggered by WW1.

The row continues to sour Turkish-Armenian relations, drawing in other countries such as Germany, whose parliament recently declared the killings to be genocide

Pope Francis made the comments on Friday during a visit to he Armenian capital, Yerevan.

"This tragedy, this genocide, has unfortunately marked the start of a sad series of great catastrophes of the last century," he said.

But Mr Canikli hit back late on Saturday, describing the remarks as "unfortunate".

"It is possible to see all the hallmarks or reflections of the mentality of the Crusades in the Pope's activities," he said, quoted by the state-run Anadolu news agency, referring to military campaigns in Medieval times promoted by the papacy against Muslims in the Middle East.

Pope Francis also used the phrase last year, prompting Turkey to recall its envoy to the Vatican for 10 months.

Matt Forney #sexist mattforney.com

It’s time to stop beating around the bush: feminists want to be raped.

It’s the only logical explanation for how they behave. It’s the only way to understand why they can cheer on hordes of Muslim “refugees” swarming into Europe to rape and pillage. It’s the only way to comprehend why they can whip themselves up into a frenzy over masculine men meeting up for a beer and smearing them as leading “pro-rape rallies.”

Everything feminists do, from holding up “Refugees Welcome” signs at airports to passing affirmative consent laws, is geared around encouraging men to assault them.

This isn’t a conscious urge. No feminist wakes up in the morning and thinks to herself, “I’m gonna try and get raped today!” There’s no Protocols of the Elders of Seneca Falls laying out a secret plot to turn females into walking fuckdolls for rapist men.

But deep in the recesses of her lizard hindbrain, the average feminist wants nothing more than for a man to shove her into a wall and force himself deep inside her.

Here are the reasons why feminists want to be sexually assaulted, and why they’re working around the clock to aid rapists.

1. Feminism is an r-selected ideology, and rape is an r-selected sexual strategy.

As Anonymous Conservative has shown repeatedly, leftism and conservatism are merely expressions of two competing reproductive strategies: r-selection and K-selection. To review quickly, K-selection breeds children to compete in a world of limited resources through a two-parent upbringing, defined by high sexual dimorphism, monogamy, late sexual maturation, and loyalty to the in-group (i.e. wolves). R-selection breeds children for a world of abundant resources through a single-mother upbringing, defined by low sexual dimorphism, promiscuity, early sexual maturation, and disloyalty to the tribe (i.e. rabbits).

The conflict between leftism (of which feminism is a subset) and conservatism is the conflict between r and K. K-selected individuals want a world that encourages competition and meritocracy, while r-selected individuals want a world of free resources: free food, free money, free shelter and free sex. In a K-selected world, men and girls have to compete to earn the right to mate with one another; in an r-selected world, men and girls have sex with no thought as to the consequences.

What does this have to do with feminism and rape? Simple: rape is the ultimate r-selected sexual strategy.

By its very definition, rape is an act of entitlement: forcing yourself on someone who doesn’t want to have sex with you, whom you haven’t earned the right to sleep with. Much in the same way leftists feel entitled to take other peoples’ money away through taxation and welfare, rapists feel entitled to stick their penises in girls’ vaginas. In fact, you could say that rape is an inherently leftist form of sex, which would explain why so many male feminists, such as Jian Ghomeshi and Hugo Schwyzer, enjoy assaulting and abusing girls.

Sexual assault is sexual socialism: redistributing nookie to the least privileged in society.

Feminists, being leftists, are r-strategists themselves. The purpose of feminism is to eliminate restrictions on female sexuality: allow girls to sleep around without getting pregnant, let them legally kill their unborn babies when they do get knocked up, and have it all funded by the taxpayer.

From an r-strategist’s perspective, rape is a good thing, because it allows a female to have children without having to do anything, aside from breathe.

It’s well-known that a great many girls have rape fantasies, and a significant number of rape victims claim to have orgasmed during their assaults. Both these points serve as evidence that a portion of the female population—the r-selected, leftist portion—not only wants to be raped, but is physiologically adapted for it.
Once you accept the premise that feminists subconsciously desire to have their vaginal walls torn up by psychopathic men, their behavior suddenly makes sense. For example, feminists are unwilling to condemn the Muslim “refugees” who have been assaulting girls in Germany and other European countries (and indeed, have accused those who talk about the story of “racism” and/or “Islamophobia”) because they want those refugees to keep raping.

The Muslim “refugees” streaming into Europe from the Middle East are the consummate r-selected cowards. Instead of fighting for their families back home, they’re fleeing to safe countries where they can live off government benefits. Instead of being grateful that Europeans are willing to take them in, they throw temper tantrums because their Internet isn’t fast enough, their food isn’t tasty enough, or they don’t have enough to do, showing that they are parasites looking for someone to leech off of.

Muslims rape European girls for the same reason that they riot over slow WiFi: they believe they deserve to get something for nothing.

Some right-wing personalities have tried to explain the left’s embrace of Muslim “rapefugees” with such nebulous concepts as “pathological altruism,” but the reality is much bleaker. In the darkest recesses of their minds, feminists want swarthy refugees to punch them in the face, tear their clothes off, and spit roast them like plump, juicy swine. Don’t expect them to suddenly realize the truth, either, because…

2. Feminists encourage girls to get raped, then deny all responsibility for their actions.

In the past few years, even the slightest suggestion that girls have a responsibility for their own safety is met with a chorus of “MISOGYNIST!” “DON’T BLAME THE VICTIM!” The oft-repeated feminist chant, “Don’t teach women not to get raped, teach men to not rape,” is an explicit call for girls to place themselves into situations where they’re likely to get sexually assaulted, then dodge all blame.

While some feminists are no doubt doing this out of naivete, the subconscious motivator for many of them is their r-selected psychology.

Personal responsibility is a K-strategist concept; in the rabbit warren, things just happen. By discouraging girls from protecting themselves, feminists are implicitly encouraging them to get violated, then pinning the blame on an undefinable “rape culture.” Which brings me to my next point…

3. Feminists talk about the West having a “rape culture” because they want a rape culture.

As mentioned above, the worldwide leftist outrage against Roosh and the Return of Kings tribal meetups far outstripped their reaction to the Muslim gang rape attacks in Germany and Sweden during New Years’ Eve. This isn’t just because of hysteria and slander: r-selected leftists are more threatened by masculine men than by cowardly Muslim rapists.

One of the most laughable claims feminists make about game/red pill/PUA culture is that it encourages men to feel “entitled” to sex and female companionship. Even skimming a manosphere blog will show that this is the opposite of the truth. “Game” and “red pill” philosophy teaches men that they have to earn girls by improving themselves: lifting, dressing better, having interesting hobbies, and being entertaining conversationalists.

If a morbidly obese basement dweller came onto the Roosh V Forum and started whining about how he couldn’t get laid, he’d be laughed at and told to hit the gym and get a life.

The reason why there’s always been an overlap between the seemingly hedonistic manosphere and the more traditionalist alternative right is because both groups have the same view of sexual relationships: men and women need to earn the right to sleep with and marry each other. The end destinations may be different, but the road is the same.

Feminists oppose this because leftists oppose competition in general. Feminist obscurantism in regards to sexual relationships (e.g. their claims that the “friendzone” doesn’t exist or claiming that men just need to “treat women like human beings” if they want to get laid) is about stripping men of their ability to compete for a mate. Similarly, pushing “fat acceptance,” tattoos and piercings, and encouraging girls to be “bossy” and sarcastic is about crippling females’ ability to compete for men.

To make matters worse, feminists have been trying to train men to rape girls for years. Their constant claim that the West has a “rape culture” is just wishful thinking: in actuality, rape has been on the decline for decades. Because of this, feminists have tried to legislate masculinity away through “affirmative consent” and “yes means yes” laws, which force men to explicitly beg for permission at every step of a sexual encounter, branding them “rapists” if they don’t comply.
Affirmative consent laws and “rape culture” claims are a two-pronged attack on masculinity, designed to advantage sneaky males and hurt masculine men, and there’s no sneakier male than a rapist.

Unfortunately, despite all the rape hoaxes the mainstream media conjures up, the “rape culture” that feminists screech about has yet to materialize.

The UVA rape story, for example, turned out to be a lurid, masturbatory fantasy passed off as “news.”

Because feminists couldn’t create a rape culture, they imported one from the Middle East.

From here, all the pieces fall into place. We see clearly why the European Union is debating banning one man from their borders and libeling him as a “rape advocate,” while letting millions of actual Muslim rapists flood their countries.

We see why leftists are driven to protest masculine men but not sneaky “refugee” cowards who abandon their families in search of government freebies and “easy” white women.

The goal of feminism is to turn women into rape-meat.

Every feminist, deep down, wants nothing more than a rapist’s baby in her belly. The armada of horny, restless, greedy Muslims storming into Europe is a bounty for the r-selected feminist. Leftists will wave “Refugees Welcome” signs no matter how many girls are forcibly DP’ed by angry Arab invaders, because Europe’s skyrocketing rape rates are a feature, not a bug.

The only thing that will stop the rape-lust of feminists and their poorly-endowed Muslim abusers is Western men having the courage to call it out.

There can be no compromise, no peace with these traitors inside the walls. While more moderate women can be saved, no one will ever be able to convince the termagents of the left that they should be more afraid of Muslim rapists than white “racists.”

They are our enemies, just as much as the dusky hordes planting their flags on our soil

John Todd #conspiracy kt70.com

The Conspiracy for world takeover is as old as man himself. The Illuminati, in recent history, has twice tried to control the world --- in Napoleon's day and during World War I.

Only about 5,000 people in the entire world know the true purpose of the Illuminati and its conspiracy to rule the earth. Their plan was written down in code, as a fictional novel, in 1957.

In the mid-1950's Philippe Rothschild ordered one of his mistresses, Ayn Rand, an established authoress and philosopher, to undertake the writing of this code to the witches of the world. This novel, Atlas Shrugged, was never intended to be a best seller, although it turned out to be one.

The main characters of Atlas Shrugged are code names for individuals or companies. The code is as follows:
John Galt --- Philippe Rothschild
Dagny Taggart --- Ayn Rand
Dagny's brother --- The combined Railroad System
Ellis Wyatt --- David Rockefeller
Hank Rearden --- U.S. Steel, Bethlehem Steel
Francisco D'Anconia --- Combined Copper Mines
Galt, D'Anconia, and the Pirate --Rothschild Tribunal

The Tribunal in the book went around convincing certain major corporation presidents of their philosophy and plan, getting them to bankrupt their own businesses. The owners of these companies would then vanish and leave with either Galt or D'Anconia to a retreat area in the Colorado mountain regions. "Colorado" is the code name for the "Bermuda Triangle", the place where the key figures of the Illuminati will be when the world crashes.

jiangweisen #wingnut #fundie deviantart.com

image
how can she be napoleon when I'M napoleon. seriously, where do they get off coming into the country illegally, criminally! & telling us that they are now america when they don't believe in the same principals that the country was founded on & they're not even wanted in the country by most people. you try that in china! try sneaking across their border & then marching in the streets saying you're china. ha. how absurd. certifiable insanity is part of mainstream media dialogue.

the Moses #fundie robot-hosting.com

The Unity, the Creator of the Universes, Earth and all in between, God of Abraham, David, Solomon, Moses, Jesus and Mohammad, the God the Father, Adonai, Jehovah, Allah, Ahura Mazda, Dao, Narayan, Bhagavan, Vishnu, the Existence as a whole, the Unified string filed of consciousness that rules the 11 dimensions of the known space-time in this Universe and limitless unknown material and non-material other Universes, (All are ONE). It decided. It is written. It is done.

Justice will be enforced on the Earth as follows. Two miracles and one global execution.

1- 19 June 2018 all butchers all over the world, 12 noon (Greenwich) will die painless quick.

2- 57 days after that, all hunters who have not been Vegan for the past 42 days, will die as above.

3- 114 days after that, all humans who have not been Vegan for the past 42 days will die, as above.

Present estimation 5 billion.

4- Surviving Vegans will have some tough time dealing with emotional traumas, the dead, economical, production, workforce and chaos. Free large scale global expert psychological counseling will be provided. They will survive, pro-create and fill the earth again.

A VEGAN EARTH. kindness is the rule

An Earth with one law above all other laws, enforced in all governments that Vegans will establish themselves.

Global Equal Legal Rights for all human and non-human animals.
Court, Evidence, death penalty. We ensure its enforcement for one human generation
then we will leave the Earth.

Behold the miracles. Learn. Become Vegan. Become kind. Survive.

Else, you will be dead in those dates and as a gift of the God will get the chance to be reborn again and again. . . in a Vegan kind world.

It is decided. It is done.

Wish you happiness
the Moses

Unknown author #sexist whatswrongwithequalrights.wordpress.com

Can I just say one thing? Ok, I hate the 1950s. seriously. I hate it that when I say that I believe in stuff like traditional gender roles and that I’ve always stayed home and stuff like that that people immediately start thinking “1950s.” Ugh. I hate that era. Personally, I see the 1950s as a time of female superiority if you want to know the truth about it. I actually think the era was quite feminist. It’s always been clear to me that both of my grandmothers were always “in charge” in their marriages. The 1950s weren’t traditional from my point of view. I mean, women were already voting and a lot of wives were already starting to join the workforce and stuff like that.

I don’t act like a 1950s housewife nor do I dress like one. Ok, well, I do kind of like stuff like vintage dresses and bikinis, but because I think they’re cute, not because I’ve got a thing for the 50s or anything like that. I used to have some vintage dresses but they fall off of me these days so I haven’t worn them in years. But, anyway, back to the subject. We’re not rich. My husband doesn’t “have money.” We’re just simple people, and I’m just a simple girl.

I know I’ve said it before, but when I say “housewife” I think a bit farther back to the times when husbands were actually in charge. I don’t think of high heels and perfectly permed hair so much as I think of bare feet, waist length hair (for a woman) and simplicity.

I also don’t like people that think housewives are somehow “lazy” or anything of the sort. I don’t sit around eating bon-bons all day, watching soap-operas, and writing “honey-do” lists while having an affair with the pool boy. I would also hate to think that a man only wanted to provide for me just because of the way I look. That’s why I would never want to be with a rich man, unless I knew in my heart that that man truly loved and cherished me for the long-term and would always do so.

My husband provides for me 100% financially speaking, as I believe it is his responsibility to do so, but he’s also in charge of everything too. For instance, he gave me a credit card on his account I could use for a while but then he took it away from me last year after I came back home. (He said it was because he got a new card, but I suspect the real reason was to take independence from me so I wouldn’t leave again. In either case, he never gave me another one.)

He gives me things I want and need, but he also has the power to say no to me or take them away from me too. And yes, I accept this even though I’ve suffered pain and frustration and I still accept it no matter what others might think about it, because it confers security on me and protects me. I’d rather accept this life than the life of the modern woman with all her unhappiness, unstable relationships and lack of ability to raise and care for her own children every day.

batterytrain #racist occidentinvicta.com

While I think that Asians who are already in North America should be accepted as our fellow citizens (if they are willing to assimilate to North America culture), I also think you’re spot on with this comment, Eren.

Asians, in my experience, are most unwilling, most unable to adapt to Euro-American culture. You’re completely correct when you say that don’t or perhaps can’t have fun, party, get drunk,etc.

For the most part.

There are many who do and can. But they are the minority.

The majority of Asians assimilate quite well into the workforce of America and Canada, but don’t blend well into the fabric of these societies.

And often in my experience, they are repulsed at doing so. Petulant even. They look down on Whites partying, socializing, getting drunk…making merry in other words.

They’re not soulless, but boy are they bland.

I’ve lived around them my entire life and it has been pretty bad for my social life.

You can’t express yourself. Individuality and personality is branded as eccentric and clownish, so you have to keep your head down. And keep working. And working. And then have children. And make them work. And work. And work. And then you die.

Asians come from a culture that doesn’t appreciate life and joy nearly as much as it appreciates order.

But you don’t need a rigid, repressive boring culture to have an orderly society.

This is why the West is the Best.

Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

Muricans are idiots. But Jefferson was a genius.

klyneal #fundie christiannews.net

You're a complete idiot. READ THE DOI. Our rights come directly from GOD. As per our governmental founding documents.

And the Constitution is based on nothing BUT Biblical principles, and protecting our God given rights. Our government recognizes GOD's existence, our reliance on God and His grace/providence.

EVERYWHERE. Just visit Washington DC. /BIBLICAL ARTIFACTS AND SAYINGS ARE ALL OVER THE PLACE.

Can't you read? How sad. You completely ignore what is right in front of your face.

For 250 years our GOVERNMENT has opened every house and senate session with a Christian prayer right out of the Bible.

In God We Trust is our NATIONAL MOTTO genius.

Have you ever recited the Pledge of Allegiance? One nation, UNDER GOD.

Hellooooooo? Are you now going to insist that the Pledge contains no reference to God?

Probably. Thick as a brick. You are so threatened by the Bible and Christianity that you have to lie to hide from it. So sad that you run from the truth instead of embracing it.

No one can make an informed, intelligent decision, or form any viable, educated opinions, unless they start with the truth.

You insist on pathetic, cowardly lies. Good luck with that.

Matt Walsh #fundie themattwalshblog.com

I have never in my life encountered a religion as oppressive, cold, and stiff as Progressivism. I’ve never known a faith more eager to burn heretics at the stake. Even a fundamentalist Iranian Muslim would flinch if he came face to face with a western liberal’s rigid dogmatism. I imagine that even a Saudi Arabian Islamic cleric would take one look at how American left wingers react when anyone deviates ever so slightly from their established orthodoxy, and say to himself, “man, these people REALLY need to chill.”

The Cult of Leftism has many tenets, and it demands full compliance with all of them, but nothing in its creed compares to the sanctity of their two great sacraments: child murder and sodomy. You must not question these, but tolerance alone will not be good enough. You must celebrate them, too. You must worship at their altar. You must sing hallelujah at the mention of their names. You must fight for a society where infanticide and gay sex are awarded a protected and privileged position. When a man decides to kill babies for a living, you must call him a ‘health care provider’ and a ‘healer.’ When a man decides to announce to the world that he enjoys sex with other men, you must call him a ‘hero’ and a ‘pioneer.’ You must quite literally give him awards for his courage.

Nothing less will be allowed.

I hope that all of my fellow Christians and conservatives soon catch on to this reality. It seems that many in our camp have been too afraid of confrontation and too addicted to approval and affirmation, so we sent up the white flag and surrendered the culture entirely. “Hey, you do you, it’s none of my business,” we said, and moved on to arguing over safer things, like the economy or foreign policy. We rejected political candidates who dared to venture onto the forbidden soil of ‘social issues’ and instead nominated milquetoast moderates who run around regurgitating platitudes about how we should ‘just talk about jobs.’ But the progressives have concentrated almost exclusively on winning the culture and reshaping our society in their image. While conservatives set up shop way off in the outskirts, liberals have burrowed right into the heart of America and gone to work subverting and perverting our civilization at its most foundational level.

It’s because they’ve claimed so many victories that they have earned the luxury to demand more than a cowering tolerance from their ideological opponents. Conservatives and Christians who tried to keep their hands clean by merely putting up with the slaughter of children and the destruction of the nuclear family are now faced with a dilemma. They can’t just tacitly endorse evil anymore — they are going to be required to give their enthusiastic and active approval. Silence will be viewed as dissent, and dissent is the highest crime.

*Walsh continues ranting about liberalism, but the blog is way too long to post in it's entirety*

Max #fundie voxday.blogspot.co.uk

You know, when VD suggested crucifixion for progressives, I assumed he was joking - and that if he wasn't, he must be a bit mentally unhinged. The idea struck me as crazy - absurd. The ravings of a lunatic or madman. That was twelve days ago.

Today, if a proposal to crucify every person belonging to left-of-center parties were put on the ballot, I would with great regret pull the lever for it. I have friends and family members who belong to left-of-center parties; I just don't see another solution. Leftism is nothing but concentrated evil, and the only way to defeat evil is completely. It must be utterly destroyed, or it will simply dust itself off and rise again.

They want to FUCK our CHILDREN. Not all of them - not yet. Today, they're only pushing for "gay marriage" (plus polygamy and incest in a few isolated places), but we know where this is going. These things (I cannot in good conscience call them human) want to create a world where parents are prevented from protecting their children, because to do so would deny kids their right to fornicate with fifty-year-old men, and only a horrible pedophobe could be against such a beautiful act of love...

I am so filled with loathing and disgust. This is an abomination. They need to die. Enablers and all.

Scott Alan Buss #fundie firebreathingchristian.com

image

Apparently, all that many most of America’s most prominent “conservative Christian leaders” need to know when it comes to determining the gender of Bruce Jenner is what Bruce Jenner says it is. If Jenner says he’s a woman, then, by golly, he’s a woman!

So what if Jenner claims to be Napoleon?

Or a tomato?

Or both?

Well then, in that case, it seems clear now that by the “conservative Christian logic” employed by the likes of Rick Santorum, Jenner would then be a Napoleonic tomato woman.

The tragic/comedic reality as to what counts for “conservative Christian” perspectives and principles in America these days was once again highlighted by recent coverage of comments made by one of the many American “conservative Christian leaders” who is all about helping likeminded “conservative Christians” to remember that we must always be willing to set aside the crystal clarity of Scripture and rely on good ol’ secular pragmatism in order to get things done here in “the real world”.

[...]

Rick is being loving.

He’s being kind.

He’s just doin’ what has to be done to get votes and keep “conservatism” viable in America, dontcha know.

And if you don’t agree with his loving, strategic capitulation on actual Christian principles as defined by Christ in His Word, well, then you’re not being a very good Christian…as most modern American “conservative Christian leaders” define such things, anyway. And you probably hate children, kittens and bunny rabbits, too.
You see, if you really loved Jenner – and America – you’d just let him be a woman.

Or Napoleon.

Or a tomato.

Or whatever.

To deny his claim to Napoleonic tomato-womanhood would be a crime against American-style freedom, liberty, and love, you see.

This is what happens to language, gender, family, patriotism and conservatism when we refuse to submit them to the Nature of God as revealed in His Word as our actual standard for testing all claims and concepts.

This is the kind of “leadership” that we are justly punished with when our itching little ears desire anything but the call to repentance and submission to Christ as King in practice in every realm of our lives.

This is the kind of delusional, destructive approach to “the real world” that we can expect to continue from our “good conservative Christian leaders” until we repent, believe, and reject the replacement of God’s Word with secular pragmatism in the name of satanic “love”.

Until and unless we repent and believe upon the Word of God as our guide to all of real world life in practice, the judgment of God will (and should) continue to pour out upon us, bringing us more “Republican Christian women” like Bruce Jenner and more “conservative Christian leaders” like Rick Santorum.

Ronkonkoma #fundie atheistforums.org

dogma is a good thing.
[...]
well,supposing you're trying to teach your kid that 1+1=2 and the smart kittle bugger comes back at you and says, no 1+1=11, and 2+2 is 22 and so on.
at some point you have to go back to math which is a very dogmatic and repressive system. That makes you eeeevil. And closed minded too!

EmpathicDesign #transphobia deviantart.com

Here's the facts: The true enemies of transgender identifying individuals are their supporters. :3

Transgender identifying individuals have a 20x higher suicide rate than any other demographic of people; but why is this?
Society? No.
Bullying? No.
Discrimination? No.
Family or peers? No.
Exclusion? No.

Answer: Unresolved dysphoria pre and post hormonal therapies and corrective surgeries.

How do you help a person kick an addictive habit: You support them into stopping what that are doing that is causing and worsening the problem, not support them into continuing it; which is what trans supporters do; they're effectively leading the transgender identifying individuals to the noose.

Helping someone is helping them stop what is causing their problems, not encourage them.

History has shown that the best solution to resolving the transgender mental illness is natal sex therapy and watchful waiting.

M.

Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

“Why do you need them if you’ve got Me? Don’t you think I’m good enough?” These are the kinds of questions God starts asking when He sees us putting our security in other people instead of in Him. Because many Christians hide out in the New Testament and refuse to read books like Isaiah, they don’t realize just how sensitive God is on this issue of dependency. But ignoring certain qualities about God that we don’t like doesn’t make those qualities disappear. God is very jealous and He doesn’t like to share our trust with others. If we refuse to face this fact, we won’t get out of being disciplined, we’ll just be confused about why we’re suffering.

God is so touchy about His creatures depending on Him that He even comes down hard on unbelievers for failing to meet His requirements in this area. Railing at pagan nations for refusing to acknowledge Him as the One who sustains them, He repeatedly lists self-reliance as one of the main reasons He is pounding them into the ground. God is the One who takes care of us, therefore He is the One we should be praising and thanking. When we start saying “Look what I did” and go about patting ourselves on the back, we can expect a spanking.

Ramin Mazaheri #fundie countercurrents.org

Why has CounterPunch spiked Andre Vltchek’s ‘Lies of the Empire’?

I first started reading Andre Vltchek on the website CounterPunch, which is a truly great leftist website… even though I will probably never get published on there, even if I was relaying the cure for cancer: CounterPunch appears totally opposed to working with any state media, and I work for Iran’s PressTV.

Rather anarchist and ivory-tower, but… whatever.

Reporters have only two choices: work for either privately-owned or state-owned media. I.e., you can work for shareholders, a patrician family (whether urban giants or rural petty tyrants), or some billionaire whose new sports team is in the middle of a boring rebuild, or you can work for the People.

I chose the People. Even if this closes a million doors to me – and the fact that I work for the Iranian People closes a million others – I have zero regrets.

(Blogging – working for Yourself – is now a third choice, but I don’t have the tech savvy to make that economically viable, and the vast majority of blogging journalists say the same thing.)

But what happened to Vltchek on CounterPunch? I don’t see anything from him on CP for more than a year? It is a truly top dissident media site, and they carry great thinkers, but I know they didn’t find someone better – at least not by much. I’m not the only one who has noticed this.

Is it because he has a Russian background and CounterPunch was duped on a few articles by a troll allegedly from Russia?

What is far more weighty is: given the 2+ years of a dangerous, misleading and appallingly stupid Russophobia campaign, US-based CounterPunch has an obvious obligation to promote Russian-linked leftists even more strongly now. That seems so obvious from a leftist analysis that I don’t think it requires much explanation. And yet… this is when CounterPunch chose to drop Vltchek?

Isn’t the US left supposed to be fostering a push to the left in the Trump era? That was supposed to be the best thing about Trump: he would pull the sheet off of American fascism – which has never been domestically discredited, unlike in Europe – to reveal that Trump is no different than Dronebama, the Clintons, the Bushes, et al. Many Americans are more hungry and receptive to leftism than ever, and leftist journalists should gladly feed them the political nutrients they have been long denied by the Mainstream Media. So how could Vltchek’s work have been spiked by CounterPunch during this particular era? One would think that leftist interest in Vltchek’s work would spike during this time, not that he would get spiked!

Maybe it’s just an oversight by CounterPunch – I’m sure they get many submissions.

The solution is obvious: Bring back Vltchek, and perhaps tap some of his compatriots and colleagues at the superb New Eastern Outlook (full of Russian communist intelligentsia who have practical knowledge of socialism) for contributions. They could also run the superb analyses of The Saker, who is a courageous anti-imperialist and also Russian. Adding these Russian worthies would emphatically show that Russia is not the enemy.

But does CounterPunch believe that…?

Is it telling that CounterPunch’s website advertises the book Russia Without Putin? Putin is centre-right in the Russian context, sure, but check your local magazine stand – surely some US journal has a cover vilifying Putin this week. The book is clearly predicted on a fantasy; it has also found a way to not be only anti-Putin, but “non-Putin”. Regardless, it seems like a interesting read, and I hope somebody reviews it on Amazon.

But, at first glance, this seems like more fantasist thinking from Western leftists, which I find particularly aggravating. Just as Western leftists know noting, investigate nothing, will not tolerate anything which challenges their fantasies on socialist-inspired Iran, the dumping of Vltchek seems like more Western leftism which refuses to see Russia as it really is, but instead as how Western leftists wish it would be. There is PLENTY of socialism in Russia, still; there is PLENTY of socialism in Iran, since 1979.

CounterPunch gets major kudos for having run Vltchek before, because Western Leftists generally have no interest in learning from the practical experiences of leftists in the Old World, and certainly not from the two main enemies of the US – Russia and Iran. US animosity towards the “continent” of China is nowhere near as strong as towards Iran, but the socialist achievements of all three of these socialist-inspired nations are not just denied by Western leftists, but denigrated as well. For whatever reason, Latin American leftists are deemed more acceptable to Western leftists – seems like an anti-Asian thing? We can certainly add in North Korea and especially Vietnam, whom Western leftists rallied around in the 1960s but whom they strangely and completely ignored once Vietnamese leftists won. Vietnam has the 2nd highesteconomic growth rate since 1990 (probably since 1981), China is #2 in increasing their UN Human development Index from 1970-2010, while Iran is #2 from 1990-2014) but – nothing for Western leftists to learn here, right?

Just being “anti-Putin” is not a very leftist stance from a leftist media like CounterPunch – right now is the time for CounterPunch to stand up for Russian leftism (and for the leftist insistence on internationalism), and not after the FBI finally admits they have nothing on Trump and Russia. However, it is very typical of Western leftists to be merely “anti-” (although being “non-” is indeed an original stance), but it’s not enough to sustain leftist-inspired revolutions, and this helps explain why the West has none.

CounterPunch should re-add Vltchek, and then add other Russian leftists as well (I think the “West Coast hippie” viewpoint can afford to lose a couple slots). This will help set many good examples, and it will counter the widespread belief that Western leftists can only push their own regional version of leftism, and are so individualistic and ethnocentric that they often appear incapable of being true internationalists.

But Vltchek is no affirmative-action hire: He is one of the very, very few open and unrepentant socialist journalists who have been around the world, burned the lying flag of imperialism, and kept the leftist flag upraised. Vltchek’s journalism helped gave me the confidence to do leftist advocacy journalism, and he can do the same for others.

I once read that a good critic doesn’t just bash what he doesn’t like – he sings the praises of that which he does like.

The book, a huge compilation of nearly 70 articles, is Vltchek serving as the world’s best socialist tour guide. It’s an encyclopedia of leftist, on-the-ground reporting from… nearly everywhere.

It’s especially fascinating to read because he seeks out reports, which overturn the Mainstream Media accounts. He goes to the places the West vilifies and lies about (Out and About in Zimbabwe’s Capital: Harare – Is It Really the Worst City on Earth?), or totally ignores (Eritrea: African Ideological Ebola for Imperialists). Zimbabwe never gets a good write-up in the West – they nationalized White farms, after all; Eritrea never gets positive press – it’s a unique socialist state, which has massively uplifted its People.

But he also goes to the West and intellectually scorches them with equal vigor. He demolishes what they incorrectly hold up as worthy of emulation (Shameful, Cowardly European Art) and he shows how hollow their own alleged “democratic successes” are, as well as those of their allies, such as Indonesia and Nigeria.

Vltchek does things like going to North Korea to make a 25-minute documentary, which the West would surely love to ban entirely and which should be on CounterPunch, but it’s his writing style which really sets him apart from other leftists: he is not telling you a story, but relating a human being’s history. Even if that person was sacrificed to capitalism-imperialism 400 years ago, Vltchek seems to feel as though it just happened and right in front of him.

I would say that Vltchek writes with the conscience of a 13-year old, and that is quite a compliment: these idealistic, freshly-minted adults are not only absolutely certain that something better should be done immediately, but that they could do it if only they could hold the reins for a time.

You see the same words over and over in Vltchek’s reports, and they are completely foreign to the daily hard-news journalism I was trained in: words like “compassion”, “humane”, “dehumanization”, “nightmarish”, “struggling”, “conscience”, “miraculous”, “beautiful”, “shameless”.

When is the last time you read a report in a newspaper – not in an editorial – which described an economically right-wing policy’s outcome as “shameless”? Vltchek uses it when talking about free-market fundamentalism, capitalism, US foreign policy, etc. Unlike the absurd, rabid, Russophobic anti-Trumpers, Vltchek is no fake-leftist – he knows it’s all about class & economics, and the permanent link between capitalism &imperialism.

Another favorite word of Vltchek’s is one which journalists don’t utter, and which they feel is their duty to ignore, is ”humiliation”. France’s protesting Yellow Vests, for example, apparently never feel “humiliated” by their 10-year, austerity-enforced, slow descent into borderline / real poverty, even though they are, and even though this explains their anger and violence (which was only marginally exceptional in France solely during the first 6 weeks of the movement).

One is struck by Vltchek’s insistence on the fact that third worlders actually do deserve to not live in humiliation – in a just media world, such a sentiment would be in every story about the developing world… but that would undermine the false idea that capitalism & neoliberal globalism is working great / has learned from the most recent crisis / could never be the reason for a foreign army base.

In his writing he is appalled by horrid living conditions, by lack of worker safety, by infrastructure so dilapidated it creates a lack of citizen safety, and by other conditions people just write off as “normal for those people”. For Vltchek, people riding on the tops of trains in Jakarta (and getting maimed or killed) is not the chance to run a bemused photo, but it always is for Western Mainstream Media. Whereas most of us gloss over it, he relates to the reader like it was the first, worst time he has ever seen poor governance, the abuses of capitalism, the rapes of imperialism, etc. This fresh-eyed view is incredibly inspirational.

Like any 13 year old, Vltchek has a clique of friends who are SO, SO much cooler. Vltchek goes to these places – like to doctors in the Bolivia of Evo Morales – and reports back, providing the reader with yet another heaping of inspiration. If he had not done this, perhaps Vltchek would have been like many other lefties – content just to vilify their neighbors, eventually growing embittered, superior and apathetic.

“To me these sights in the middle of the Bolivian Andes were like the essence of human nature – by now almost extinct – but still the essence played in front of my eyes. I was very much aware of the fact that this was exactly the socialism in which I have believed for decades; it was right here, in action, in front of my eyes. And it was simple, natural and undogmatic.”

It is these stories, which supply the vital, other half to his work: the requited passion, the justice, the action, the promises kept, the potential fulfilled.

It is fundamentally flattering to the reader, and correct, that Vltchek appears to treat every true leftist as though they were Che Guevara: he does not overvalue the leftist figures from his own nations, and he does not see historical figures as Ubermen from a golden or Salafist era. He sees everyone standing on the same level – even if that person is barefoot and dirty. What impresses him is only moral leftist effort, struggle and sacrifice. That is the true socialist mentality, just as much as it is true leftistinternationalism.

Vltchek is an opponent of the smug & cold, the poseur & the disingenuous, the elitists & those who stratify themselves away from the People. For example, Vltchek is an atheist, but that doesn’t mean he supports stupidity when it comes to those who are anti-religion (from Blaming It All on the Muslims):

“She is not the only person in Istanbul I know who has those moments. In the ‘City of Dreams’ to show spite for Islam and for practicing Muslims is clearly some commonly-used secret password to the universe of what is acceptable here as brainy and hip.”

You don’t read that from the Mainstream Media because, to them, being Islamophobic IS brainy and hip; you don’t read that from a lot of leftist media because they ARE Islamophobic, which includes the fear of Islam as a political force in any definition of the term. Islam is not the danger in the Muslim World – capitalism-imperialism and Western racism-ethnocentrism are the dangers. Vltchek is an atheist, but it seems he’s not so dogmatic, superior, ruthless and politically-stupid as to think socialism can function without embracing members who also choose to be religious. In short: he’s not an idiot nor a bigot – he’s a true internationalist.

If I had to pin down his official label I would describe Vltchek’s overall view most in line with “Cuban-style” socialism: after all, no country (other than the USSR) has been more truly internationalist (there would have been no South African independence without Cuban assistance to Angola, which was not even a Spanish colony); conversely, Chinese and Iranian internationalist efforts, while extensive, vital and costly, have been limited to regional affairs.

In a justworld, Vltchek is tapped to run a media company by a leftist billionaire. I don’t think there is such a thing, though….

However, there are leftist-influenced states – two of them are publishing me and Vltchek (NEO is part of the Russian Academy of Sciences), whereas CounterPunch is not, whatever their reasons are. Thank God for state media, eh?

Leftists writers all know: we are not in this for money, because what we propose is a guaranteed loser – writing leftist journalism in the English language. No Anglophone country is remotely socialist and most are ardently anti-socialist, so there is near-zero demand. We should pick something with slightly greater sales prospects: like selling pamphlets on atheism in Farsi, or books railing against the evils of hockey & donuts in Canada.

But if you can’t bankroll a media company, I hope you have some money to buy Vltchek’s book. The most important unsaid leftist phrase in the West is “anti-imperialist” – here is a book which tells you the state of that struggle around the world.

Eugenicist #fundie sluthate.com

For fuck's sake, wake up humanity. Love is not sacred.

Love is not a sacred bond/ cosmic pairing. It's trade exchange. The fluffy romantic disney virtue value of all of it is false. All of it.

Only people who value it are lonely insecure pussies who (are rarities) that are happy to have any person that will take them. And, are people who buy into naiveness while completely unaware that they biologically hold uncontrollable basic functions that draw them near people of value. No matter how circumspect they are of it, they end up falling for their primal urgings. Those who really don't give a shit about leftist/ humanitarian viewpoints just engage in it fully and shrug out "that's life" or "haha I'm better than people and I wanna disadvantage them all" inner narratives for their indulgences that bring about inequality and unfairness. For those not of good lms/ smv.

Men love sex primal, as do women. Men would rather slay women who are hard to get, and have issues in order to make them feel like they're the tamers of the elements... rather than having people who are truly bondable/ spiritually compatible. As do women. They wanna feel they're atop the hierarchy by getting with people with high primal capital, I.E. high LMS.

Hence love has never broadly been about people being loving/ communal throughout humanity. It's about cryptoconquests and cryptocompetitions that the euphemisms/ happy clappy narrative of society was meant to hide. And it works, and leftism/ egalitarianism/ humanitarianism/ Obamaism/ Clintonism/ etc. is all just a politicized/ legalistic extreme extension of this cultural fronting.

Fairy braiding pussy wussy mansy pansy faggots everywhere.

Bay Area Guy #fundie occidentinvicta.com

Our liberal leaning mainstream media never hesitates to inform us that whites are slowly but surely becoming minorities within Western countries. Most of the time such trends are reported in a mildly enthusiastic manner, with naysayers depicted as paranoid and alarmist racists. I guess according to leftist logic, objecting to your group’s eventual extinction renders you a horrible extremist.

However, another refrain that I’ve heard from many online leftists on blogs and elsewhere is that whites are already a global minority. Therefore, recent demographic changes are only natural. When reading through Studs Terkel’s book Race, one black woman that he interviewed emphatically rejected the term “minority” in favor of “people of color,” arguing that non-whites like her are the global majority.

Putting aside the foolish notion of a united “people of color” coalition and the fact that all groups are global minorities (as once pointed out by Jared Taylor), I’ll accept the argument that whites are a global minority at face value. After all, one cannot technically dispute such a claim. However, in the spirit of my post on the left and collective responsibility, I’m going to play the fun game of taking leftist logic and applying it to other groups. In this case, the intended target of my game are leftists themselves.

So how does this play out? While leftists love to gloat about how whites are either the true global minority or increasingly losing numbers in Western nations, the truth of the matter is that it is SJWs and cultural leftists who are the true global minority. In order to substantiate my claim, I’m going to analyze the attitudes and behaviors of the non-white global majority, with much emphasis on the heavily populated Asian nations that comprise much of this colored alliance.

I’ll begin with China, which has over one billion non-white people and is poised to challenge Western power in the years to come. Having taking courses on China during college, I learned that nationalism and intense patriotism are very much mainstream in China, and that regular Chinese have no patience for the agitation of minority groups such as Uighurs and Tibetans. Sure, minority groups receive certain benefits such as being able to have more children and a few affirmative action programs, but there’s no support for the kind of multiculturalism or radical leftism that bashes the Han majority or celebrates the impending demise of ethnic Chinese dominance. If one were to attack and demonize the Han Chinese in the same manner that SJW’s attack whites, he had better brace himself for a fight. China would also run afoul of leftist gender sensibilities, as their very own state feminist agency denounces unmarried “leftover women.” While women in China are able to acquire good careers and rise, they are also held to moral standards and society expects them to conform to some manner of traditional behavior. China, by and large, is very much a conservative society.

China’s fellow Asian giant and brown neighbor India exhibits similar tendencies. India’s Hindu majority certainly would not engage in the kind of self-flagellation endemic to white liberals, nor would they tolerate having their culture pathologized or deconstructed in SJW fashion. Their election of far-right nationalist Narendra Modi, who presided over a brutal pogrom against Muslims in 2002, indicates that they would do more than just employ the “tone argument” against those with the audacity to admonish them to “check their privilege.”

Let's see courageous SJW's challenge their privilege
I don’t think SJW’s would have the temerity to challenge their privilege

It also goes without saying that feminism of the Western variety doesn’t fly in India. India, like China, remains a conservative society with an unapologetic majority and a strong sense of tradition.

Lest one think that such chauvinism is merely confined to poor and dysfunctional third world countries, Japan likewise makes no effort to win any multicultural or feminist awards. Makoto Sakurai, the leader of an anti-foreigner hate group who wrote a blatantly racist anti-Korean book, was rewarded by having his book become a number one bestseller on Japan’s Amazon. While he may be extreme, the Japanese as a whole reject mass immigration and multiculturalism. Most Japanese likewise do not look kindly on liberals who bring up negative episodes of Japan’s history. With the blessing of Shinzo Abe’s popular government, the Japanese right is currently putting the squeeze on liberal media outlets. The Japanese are also not renowned for their embrace of feminism, outrage over certain sexist antics notwithstanding. Despite boasting one of the world’s most advanced economies, Japan nonetheless subscribes to fundamentally conservative values.

The aforementioned nations are just the tip of the iceberg. To be clear, this isn’t to say that these countries are cauldrons of hatred where minorities are pelted with rocks every time they leave the house. However, they are nonetheless unapologetically proud nationalist nations that defend their ethnic and religious majorities. Dota once told me that throughout the world, there are very few liberals. Rather, there are nationalists and moderates, with moderates upholding fundamental nationalist values (with the crude bigotry removed). Some might point to the popularity of socialists in Latin America, but even there socialist movements often take place within the context of racial nationalism, as demonstrated by Evo Morales and indigenous revivalism in Bolivia.

Indeed, it is only in the Anglosphere and Western European nations where suicidal liberalism and radical leftism flourish. The real reason why SJWs relentlessly demonize and attack white people is because they can. They know that they live in societies where their subversive views are not only tolerated, but encouraged. They know that white people as a whole won’t fight back. In fact, if they’re successful self-promoters like Tim Wise, they can even manage to enjoy lucrative speaking gigs at prominent universities and media outlets.

This knowledge ought to provide a measure of confidence to those of us in the alternative right. Far from being fringe extremists, we are the true global majority. In fact, we would be considered open-minded moderates by global standards, as most of the non-white planet regards our views as sensible and pragmatic. Subversive leftist deconstructionists are the real global minorities, and we should strive to remind everyone that our enemies represent true deviancy.

Bay Area Guy #racist archive.today

Our liberal leaning mainstream media never hesitates to inform us that whites are slowly but surely becoming minorities within Western countries. Most of the time such trends are reported in a mildly enthusiastic manner, with naysayers depicted as paranoid and alarmist racists. I guess according to leftist logic, objecting to your group’s eventual extinction
renders you a horrible extremist.

However, another refrain that I’ve heard from many online leftists on blogs and elsewhere is that whites are already a global minority. Therefore, recent demographic changes are only natural. When reading through Studs Terkel’s book Race, one black woman that he interviewed emphatically rejected the term “minority” in favor of “people of color,” arguing that non-whites like her are the global majority.

Putting aside the foolish notion of a united “people of color” coalition and the fact that all groups are global minorities (as once pointed out by Jared Taylor), I’ll accept the argument that whites are a global minority at face value. After all, one cannot technically dispute such a claim. However, in the spirit of my post on the left and collective responsibility, I’m going to play the fun game of taking leftist logic and applying it to other groups. In this case, the intended target of my game are leftists themselves.
So how does this play out? While leftists love to gloat about how whites are either the true global minority or increasingly losing numbers in Western nations, the truth of the matter is that it is SJWs and cultural leftists who are the true global minority. In order to substantiate my claim, I’m going to analyze the attitudes and behaviors of the non-white global majority, with much emphasis on the heavily populated Asian nations that comprise much of this colored alliance.

I’ll begin with China, which has over one billion non-white people and is poised to challenge Western power in the years to come. Having taking courses on China during college, I learned that nationalism and intense patriotism are very much mainstream in China, and that regular Chinese have no patience for the agitation of minority groups such as Uighurs and Tibetans. Sure, minority groups receive certain benefits such as being able to have more children and a few affirmative action programs, but there’s no support for the kind of multiculturalism or radical leftism that bashes the Han majority or celebrates the impending demise of ethnic Chinese dominance. If one were to attack and demonize the Han Chinese in the same manner that SJW’s attack whites, he had better brace himself for a fight. China would also run afoul of leftist gender sensibilities, as their very own state feminist agency denounces unmarried “leftover women.” While women in China are able to acquire good careers and rise, they are also held to moral standards and society expects them to conform to some manner of traditional behavior. China, by and large, is very much a conservative society.

China’s fellow Asian giant and brown neighbor India exhibits similar tendencies. India’s Hindu majority certainly would not engage in the kind of self-flagellation endemic to white liberals, nor would they tolerate having their culture pathologized or deconstructed in SJW fashion. Their election of far-right nationalist Narendra Modi, who presided over a brutal pogrom against Muslims in 2002, indicates that they would do more than just employ the “tone argument” against those with the audacity to admonish them to “check their privilege.”

It also goes without saying that feminism of the Western variety doesn’t fly in India. India, like China, remains a conservative society with an unapologetic majority and a strong sense of tradition.

Lest one think that such chauvinism is merely confined to poor and dysfunctional third world countries, Japan likewise makes no effort to win any multicultural or feminist awards. Makoto Sakurai, the leader of an anti-foreigner hate group who wrote a blatantly racist anti-Korean book, was rewarded by having his book become a number one bestseller on Japan’s Amazon. While he may be extreme, the Japanese as a whole reject mass immigration and multiculturalism. Most Japanese likewise do not look kindly on liberals who bring up negative episodes of Japan’s history. With the blessing of Shinzo Abe’s popular government, the Japanese right is currently putting the squeeze on liberal media outlets. The Japanese are also not renowned for their embrace of feminism, outrage over certain sexist antics notwithstanding. Despite boasting one of the world’s most advanced economies, Japan nonetheless subscribes to fundamentally conservative values.
The aforementioned nations are just the tip of the iceberg. To be clear, this isn’t to say that these countries are cauldrons of hatred where minorities are pelted with rocks every time they leave the house. However, they are nonetheless unapologetically proud nationalist nations that defend their ethnic and religious majorities. Dota once told me that throughout the world, there are very few liberals. Rather, there are nationalists and moderates, with moderates upholding fundamental nationalist values (with the crude bigotry removed). Some might point to the popularity of socialists in Latin America, but even there socialist movements often take place within the context of racial nationalism, as demonstrated by Evo Morales and indigenous revivalism in Bolivia.

Indeed, it is only in the Anglosphere and Western European nations where suicidal liberalism and radical leftism flourish. The real reason why SJWs relentlessly demonize and attack white people is because they can. They know that they live in societies where their subversive views are not only tolerated, but encouraged. They know that white people as a whole won’t fight back. In fact, if they’re successful self-promoters like Tim Wise, they can even manage to enjoy lucrative speaking gigs at prominent universities and media outlets.

This knowledge ought to provide a measure of confidence to those of us in the alternative right. Far from being fringe extremists, we are the true global majority. In fact, we would be considered open-minded moderates by global standards, as most of the non-white planet regards our views as sensible and pragmatic. Subversive leftist deconstructionists are the real global minorities, and we should strive to remind everyone that our enemies represent true deviancy.

Jared Taylor #racist #wingnut amren.com

We Are Ruled by Fools

And we are a nation of cowards.

The protests and riots over the death of George Floyd have had remarkable results. One has been rituals of subservience by whites. In New York City, hundreds of white people knelt and repeated degrading slogans shouted at them by a black man. [00:9 – 00:24] They also chanted that the solution was not voting but revolution.

The white police chief of Webster, Massachusetts, went face-down on the pavement during a Black Lives Matter protest. One black shouted, “It’s not enough, but it’s a start.”

In Cary, North Carolina, white police officers washed the feet of a black pastor and his wife.

Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer, and other Democrats knelt and observed nine minutes of silence to “honor George Floyd.”.

In Bethesda, whites repeated what sounded like a new profession of faith. [0:00 – 0:22] Black protest and the fight against that will o’ the wisp known as “systemic racism” has become like a religion.

Maybe that’s why no one dares punish rioters. In Washington, prosecutors dropped charges against virtually every person the police brought in on a felony rioting charge. Fort Worth Police also dropped rioting charges against protesters. The Manhattan DA decided not to prosecute protesters for low-level offences, including unlawful assembly and disorderly conduct. That’s just as well for Chiara de Blasio, the daughter of the Mayor Bill de Blasio. She was facing those very charges.

It may be that all white men are as bad as Frank Rizzo. The theory today is that we are all racists and that even the best intentioned whites can’t help propping up white supremacy. That thinking logically leads to signs like this one, which says, “Haiti did it in 1804. This is just Round 2. What happened in 1804? Blacks slaughtered all the whites on the island.

Here’s another Black Lives Matter sign: “We are not like our ancestors. We will Fuck you up.” This lady seems to have a broader program in mind than merely justice for George Floyd.

One expert estimates that the damage, looting, and business losses for Target during the protests were $50 to $100 million. What’s the solution? Target has pledged $10 million to “help heal,” as the company put it, and promised 10,000 hours of free consulting to people of color who own small businesses. Only to people of color. Don’t even ask if you’re white.

The Financial Times noted that “US companies flood civil rights groups with donations.” The paper has a table of corporate pledges that total more than $485 million. The list isn’t complete. Apple and YouTube are each going to spend $100 million to fight racism. The beauty company Glossier pledged $1 million that the Financial Times didn’t know about, and I’m sure there’s a lot more. The eventual total could be – what? — 1 billion? 2 billion? American companies are laying off millions and millions of people. And they are giving millions and millions of dollars to the folks who rioted, looted, and burned their businesses.

It seems that every organization in the country is preening itself on racial sensitivity. The principal of my daughter’s high school sent all us parents a message about what he called, “the heinous acts of racism and hate that have occurred in our country.” The Yale Club of Washington DC wrote to tell me, “We can only begin to understand the daily pain of our black peers. Institutional racism, inequity, and injustice are unacceptable.” A friend got a message that said, “the Minnesota Orchestra will reduce our reliance on and reproduction of white privilege and will disrupt our own role in systemic racism.” What have these musicians, in their masks, standing eight feet apart, ever done that was remotely racist?

The rules change when you protest against the public health crisis of racism. Perhaps you saw that over 1,000 health professionals had written a public letter about the demonstrations, saying, “We do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission. We support them as vital to the national public health.” But they said any other demonstrations are bad, especially if you are out of work and protesting a lockdown order. We’re supposed to stay indoors even if it kills the economy, but go ahead and catch Covid or give to someone else if it’s in the name of George Floyd.

White people everywhere were caught up in this festival of guilt and capitulation. Here is Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — in the middle wearing just the right mask – for a Black Lives Matter rally. Along with aides, he knelt in tribute to George Floyd.

These lads in Brussels tore a traffic signal off a pole and threw it at the police. [0:00 to 0:11] With the Brussels police occupied, looting went on in high spirits. [0:22 – 0:35] The London police ran away from demonstrators.” [00:10 – 00:41] A statue of Belgian King Leopold II had to be vandalized and torn down because . . . well, I’m sure you know why.

The BBC sent this astonishing tweet: “27 police officer injured during largely peaceful anti-racism protests in London.” Looks very peaceful.

Here’s the main lesson from all of this: Violence works. Rioting works. If you burn down enough buildings you get what you want. What if blacks had seen the video of George Floyd’s death and quietly waited for the investigation, indictment, trail, and verdict. That’s what white people did when a black Minneapolis policeman shot and killed an unarmed white women. It’s the civilized thing to do. But if blacks and their hopped up “white allies” had done the civilized thing, there wouldn’t be a billion dollars splashed out for black causes, would there? There wouldn’t be monuments to white men coming down all over the country. There wouldn’t be white people on their knees, washing the feet of black people.

Are our rulers such fools they don’t know that if you give in to a child’s temper tantrum, you get more tantrums? Don’t they understand that if you bow to the mob, you get more mobs. I guess they don’t. Our rulers really are . . . fools.

Tremley #racist stormfront.org

"The White race has crossed seas, harnessed rivers, carved mountains, tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren icefields. It has been responsible for the invention of the printing press, cement, the harnessing of electricity, flight, rocketry, astronomy, the telescope, space travel, firearms, the transistor, radio, television, the telephone, the lightbulb, photography, motion pictures, the phonograph, the electric battery, the automobile, the steam engine, railroad transportation, the microscope, computers, and millions of other technological miracles.

The White Race has discovered countless medical advances, incredible applications, scientific progress, etc. Its members have included such greats as Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Tacitus, Julius Ceaser, Napoleon, William the Conqueror, Marco Polo, Washington, Jefferson, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Magellan, Cabot, Edison, Graham Bell, Pasteur, Leeuwenhoek, Mendel, Newton, Galileo, Watt, Ford, Luther, Devinci, Poe, Tennyson, and thousands upon thousands of other notable achievers.

Throughout 6,000 years of recorded history, the Black African Negro has invented nothing.

1). Not a written language, weaved cloth, a calendar, a plow, a road, a bridge, a railway, a ship, a system of measurement, or even the wheel. (Note: This is in reference to the pure-blooded Negro)

2). He is not known to have ever cultivated a single crop or domesticated a single animal for his own use (although many powerful and docile beasts abounded around him)

3). His only known means of transporting goods was on the top of his hard burry head. For shelter he never progressed beyond the common mud hut, the construction of which a beaver or muskrat is capable.

4). He never build a house although there were millions of board feet of lumber at his fingertips; he never built a table or chairs; he never built a chest of drawers, a dresser; he never built a bed, or desk; he never built a kitchen, never built a stove; he never formed a brick, until he saw the white man do it; he never made a knife, spoon, fork, dish, glass, cup, or any of the other things to eat with; he never built a building; created a money system; he never discovered how to doctor those who were sick except with a few natural remedis that he accidently found; he never built a fireplace to cook and warm himself with; he never weaved a piece of cloth, nor made a shirt, pants, dress, bed clothes, sheets, spreads, quilts, or anything of the sort; he never built an automobile, an airplane, a train, a bus, truck, tractor; he never farmed anything until the white man showed him how, and then when the white man left he let the tractors that he had been given sit and rust away, and the fields unplowed; he never dug a well to produce water for his crops, family, friends and etc., but when the white man came and dug the wells and installed the pumps they used the water with glee, but when the white man left and the pump wore out instead of fixing it they went to the city and begain begging the white man for more food and water."

Julie Gunlock #fundie nypost.com

As a mom of three young kids, I’m careful about what they’re exposed to on television, and I screen the shows they watch to confirm they reflect our family values of respect and courteousness. That’s why my kids are banned from watching the Disney Channel.

The Disney Channel and its spin-off, Disney XD, are no longer “safe spaces” for kids. The kid characters on Disney’s shows are often mouthy and disrespectful to parents and authority figures (who are usually scripted as muddle-headed and embarrassingly square). Even many of the strange animated characters make crass and nasty comments.

Shockingly, both my conservative and liberal parent friends tend to be angered by Disney’s programming. And in the Trump era, moms treasure these rare moments of bipartisan disgust.

Of course, some defend Disney, saying the company is only reflecting our culture and doing what all corporations do by responding to consumer demand. Yet maybe the company should reconsider caving in to the worst impulses of an immature demographic — Disney XD is designed for kids aged 6 to 14.

After all, Disney has another consumer to consider — the wearied parent battling modern culture to instill principles of kindness, politeness and respect of elders. This Sisyphean task is made more difficult when kids get a regular dose of vulgar speech, crude jokes and insolent behavior on a channel designed for kids.

If that isn’t enough, Disney has now decided to throw some sex and gender issues into the mix.

Small-screen shows like “Andi Mack” featured a tween character coming to terms with his own sexuality.

Disney is pushing boundaries even further by attempting to address the transgender issue.

On a recent episode of the Disney XD show “Star vs. the Forces of Evil,” a young boy dresses up as Princess Marco Turdina — get it? Turd-ina — in order to rescue a group of girls from the evil headmistress at St. Olga’s Reform School for Wayward Princesses. Sounds tame, right? Boy rescues girls, how traditional.

But when the boy is revealed to be — gasp! — a boy by the headmistress who reveals he has chest hair under his princess costume, the young girls rally around him and launch into the sort of social-justice lecture one might see playing out on the University of California, Berkeley campus.

The scene begins with the headmistress shouting, “Turdina isn’t a princess. She’s a boy!” To which the girls, responding to such a disgusting display of gender bigotry, offer a chorus of defense for Turdina, shouting down the headmistress with comments like:

“Why does it matter if he’s a boy? Nothing he said was wrong!” “He can be a princess if he wants to!” “Turdina is a state of mind!”

No doubt, Disney writers understood this scene would make parents uncomfortable, but what they didn’t understand is the nature of the discomfort.
Sure, some will be unhappy with the transgender-embracing message, but most will be more concerned that kids are being told it’s OK to shout down an adult.

Is that how we want children acting — shouting down authority figures? Oh, wait, they’re already doing that. Again, just look at our college campuses.

We hear a lot from the left about how corporations have a duty to make the world a better place for all mankind.

In response to activist pressure, most corporations give lavishly to environmental causes. Corporations are told they must diversify their workforce. As such, most major corporations, both old and new, have initiated a variety of badly managed “Corporate Diversity Programs” that have done nothing more than increase tension in the workforce.

Corporations do these things because the public demands it — and to avoid lawsuits.

When it comes to how parents feel and how most parents want to raise kids, Disney seems to think it has zero responsibility.

That’s not going to change until parents start pushing back — or, you know, start pushing the television’s “off” button when Disney comes on.

Jim #racist blog.jim.com

The American empire, aka anti American Empire, aka The international community, aka rule by rootless childless cosmopolitans with no future and no past, is in retreat.

Having lost Russia, Poland, Hungary, and Philippines, it just took another body blow in Australia.

A shark has to keep swimming, or it will drown, and the ever increasing holiness of the left has to keep knocking over new applecarts, or else there will be no apples rolling around for ambitious leftist to pick up.

They never stop; they only pause to re-group and change strategy. They can’t stop.

The Trump like Australian Prime minister Tony Abbot decisively stopped illegal immigration, (Zero illegal arrivals since 2014, yes, zero. You read that correctly. Zero.) and busted near every illegal visa overstay and violation of visa conditions, as near to all of them as makes no difference

Leftism had to start advancing in Australia on another front, on something other than white genocide. They dithered between expanding legal immigration as a slower route to white genocide, and smashing western civilization by rolling back the industrial revolution. And eventually coalesced on smashing western civilization, rolling back the industrial revolution.

Western civilization depends on concentrated and reliable energy sources, power on tap. Which means carbon or nuclear.

Nuclear was stopped primarily the way NASA was stopped, by putting stupid people in charge. It is not apparent that fusion power would be workable even with smart people in charge, but to be on the safe side, they put stupid people in charge of developing thermonuclear as well. The big vulnerability of nuclear power is not the imaginary evils of nuclear power (The long term effect of Chernobyl was the deaths of at most nine people outside the power plant outer fence) it is that you need smart people in charge of nuclear power. It is easy to disrupt cooperation between smart people by inserting stupid people.

The objective of the global warming scam is to stop carbon power, coal and oil.

And the left decided that was the front it would advance on in Australia was, instead of eradicating the white race. Expanding legal immigration had some success, but legal means that the numbers are known, and political pushback likely to be effective.

South Australia, and to a lesser extent Queensland, proceeded to smash their energy industries at the state level, but for any one Australian state to destroy its energy industry has limited effect if energy using businesses can flee to other states, and if energy can be imported through the grid from one state to another. For the policy to be effective, has to be federally implemented.

The Australian federal Prime minister bowed to pressure and introduced an “energy security” plan, which would have provided energy security the way that Lucy was going to hold the football for Charlie Brown. The real intent of the Global Warming scam was revealed in South Australia, where the South Australian state government did to South Australia what Obama did to flyover country.

With the “energy security plan” it became obvious that greenies would absolutely never accept any compromise that left Western high tech civilization viable, that any attempt compromise with greenies would end with a result that would do to the Australian economy what it damn near did to the South Australian economy.

...

The more stuff leftists knock over, the more loot for leftists, the more leftist activism you get. Conversely, when the expected gold rush fails to eventuate, you get loss of left wing morale and energy.

As leftism goes ever lefter, you have more people seeking holiness jobs, which means that ever larger apple carts have to be knocked over at ever shorter intervals. The shark cannot stop swimming, and will do whatever it takes to keep on swimming. And it is going to take measures that increasing collapse constitutional legitimacy and peaceful relations between nations, leading to internal war, external war, or both. Notice that when the color revolution in Libya failed, the state department turned spectacularly murderous and destructive, and that when the color revolution in Syria failed, it turned genocidal.

Expect, therefore, the unexpected. As the arc of history bends ever more to indiscriminate, destructive, and malicious evil, it encounters more resistance. One might expect that this will result in stability at some tolerable level of evil. This stabilization has never happened in the past and is unlikely to happen in the future. What happens instead is what we see happening in the US. The left escalates, drifting closer to war internal and external.

CharlesMaurras13 and Lethalmouse1 #wingnut #psycho reddit.com

[Comment under "What can we do to stop republicanism from arising in a monarchy?"]

@CharlesMaurras13

Kill the leftist or put them in concentration/prison camp Francisco franco realized this and did what he could but even he could not vanquish leftism in Spain.

Reply by Lethalmouse1:

The King came in and was like "Democracy! Oh, please let me still call myself king and have some money? Thanks bc I brought DEMOCRACY, HAIL ME AS A HERO!"

So sad

[Later]

@Zielenskizebinski

Franco was utter shite. Yes, the Left killed many of the clergy, but most of it was a reaction against Franco's horrific atrocities. Under Franco, Moorish troops were used to rape any Republican women even if all they had to do with the movement was being in a union. Entire villages were slaughtered. Franco deserves his place in Hell.

Reply by CharlesMaurras13:

Franco is a saviour of western Christian civilization, Republican women were the enemy and rape happens in war, not saying its ok but saying thats what happens in war, Franco prevented a soviet puppet state in western europe which could have potentially spread communism further he restored the monarchy and catholicism as the state religion he deserves to be canonized at least for his services to God.

Jason Jorjani #racist rawstory.com

Though many members of the alt-right claim to not be racists or white supremacists, videos recorded by an infiltrator among their ranks proves otherwise.

Patrik Hermansson, a 25-year-old Swede, went undercover to infiltrate the alt-right, creating a fake identity that led him to meetings with some of the group’s leaders.

As video Hermansson provided to the New York Times shows, he got one of the group’s highest-ranking members — Alt-Right Corporation board member Jason Reza Jorjani — to admit his “final solution” for minorities.

“It’s gonna end with the expulsion of the majority of the migrants, including [Muslim] citizens,” Jorjani told an undercover Hermansson at a pub near the Empire State Building in New York City. “It’s gonna end with concentration camps and expulsions and war at the cost of a few hundred million people.”

“We will have a Europe, in 2050, where the bank notes have Adolf Hitler, Napoleon Bonaparte, Alexander the Great,” he continued. “And Hitler will be seen like that: like Napoleon, like Alexander, not like some weird monster who is unique in his own category — no, he is just going to be seen as a great European leader.”

Jorjani also claimed to have connections within the Trump administration, and to even have spoken to the president himself.

“The scary thing about the Alt Right Corp and Jason Jorjani is that they’re building a media empire,” Hermansson said at the beginning of the video, citing the AltRight.com website Jorjani runs with the help of notorious figures like Richard Spencer.