Similar posts

seeker42 #fundie rr-bb.com

You might consider helping him understand HOW its a lie. Take a look at the average for indoctrination: 1. Average amount of hours per child per school year in Public School: 1000 ONE THOUSAND HOURS 2. Average amount of time (hours) by Christians who consider themselves 'serious' and who take their kids to church: 52 hours per year (1 per Sunday)... Lets see 52 Hrs versus 1000 hrs of Indoctrination, and people Actually still wonder, why Christians go to college and 'struggle'.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

CM asks if we can put together a rating system for Christian books. I think this is a good idea, although I think it bears some discussion on the best way to do that.

My thought is something similar to the SJW review of games system might be useful, with zero being the perfect score of containing nothing that would be objectionable to the Christian AND containing genuine and explicit Christian elements. There is a difference, after all, as Misty of Chincoteague is entirely unobjectionable, but it has no Christian content per se.

Let's consider some possible point factors, beginning with those that would likely be more or less acceptable to most Christian parents, but are potentially indicative of religious or ideological problems:
contains no genuine and explicit Christian element +1
exhibits unconventional Christian theology +1
characters demonstrate disrespect for peers or parents +1
an animal or major character dies +1
contains suggestions of physical violence +1

Then there are the elements that will be objectionable to the more conservative families:
contains squishy Disney-style "moral" messages +2
contains direct descriptions of physical violence +2
features indirect sexual themes +2
contains egregious or saintly minority characters +2
features aggressively "pro-science" themes +2
contains euphemistic swearing +2

Followed by those elements to which most parents will not want to expose their children:
contains openly atheist characters +3
contains detailed and gleeful portrayals of physical violence +3
features PG-13 sex scenes +3
advocates left-liberal political or ideological positions +3
contains light and occasional swearing +3
Features emotionally devastating scene +3

And then the completely unacceptable:
contains openly atheist or anti-theist messages +5
mocks Christianity +5
sadistic horror and physical violence +5
features pornographic sex scenes or romanticizes adultery +5
features homosexual and other sexually deviant characters +5
contains a considerable quantity of vulgarities and obscenities +5

Now, it is important to keep in mind that a novel can contain absolutely every element here and still be a Christian novel. What makes a novel Christian or not depends upon its intrinsic recognition that Jesus Christ (or some fictional facsimile therein), is the Lord and Savior of Mankind.

A Throne of Bones scores a lot of points, Book Two will score even more. But they are not books for children; I haven't let my own children read them. Every parent has to draw their own line, but it would certainly be useful to have a large database at Castalia House where books could be rated. For example, The Lord of the Rings would rate about a 5 of 65. A Throne of Bones would rate 30. A Game of Thrones would rate 55. I think anything over 15 should be considered unacceptable to most parents.

There is considerable room for improving the system, and I would welcome suggestions as well as the rating of various books.

AnAverageJoe #racist stormfront.org

So you think we are crazy? READ THIS

So I was doing some reading not too long ago and decided this data may be useful. To anyone coming here believing we are crazy, racist, stupid, or just plain full of ****, please, read on. Read this post fully before you decide to reply calling me a racist or a hater. If you can't do this simple task, you are a hopeless libtard.


First off, let's talk briefly about our stance. Many here feel we as European descendants should have a land to ourselves. The Chinese have a land to themselves. The Japanese have a land to themselves. Even Africans have a land to themselves. What about us? There is not a single country on this planet where "white people" can be at peace without other races bothering them. Why is this? That's an advanced topic we would love to share but we don't want to waste our time telling it to someone who will ignore everything said. If you genuinely want to know, feel free to ask and someone will explain it further.

"But that's silly! First off there is only one race, the human race!" Wrong. Yes we all belong to the same species (this is debated). However we are not all alike or equal. There are essentially three groups (usually referred to as "races") within the human species. The Caucasoid (White Europeans basically), the Mongoloid (Asians basically), and the Negroid (Africans basically). Each has their own traits that are quite different from the others. It is well known but almost never said that the Negroids tend to have the lowest IQs (well below that of either Caucasoids or Mongoloids) while the Caucasoids and Mongoloids tend to have the highest (an average of only a few points difference between Mongoloids and Caucasoids). The Caucasoids also tend to be more creative than either the Mongoloid or Negroid. There is very specific physical characteristics between the "races". We are NOT all alike. This is a complex topic that we also would love to tell you about, but would rather not waste time with someone who will ignore everything said. If you genuinely want to know, feel free to ask and someone will explain it further.

"Among white Americans, the average IQ, as of a decade or so ago, was 103. Among Asian-Americans, it was 106. Among Latino Americans, it was 89. Among African-Americans, it was 85. Around the world, studies find the same general pattern: whites 100, East Asians 106, sub-Sarahan Africans 70. One IQ table shows 113 in Hong Kong, 110 in Japan, and 100 in Britain. White populations in Australia, Canada, Europe, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States score closer to one another than to the worldwide Negroid average. It's been that way for at least a century."

For the record, mine is 132 (I have taken several tests and the range is 130 to 145).

"Are Jews white?" Yes and no. They are a mixed breed (typically a mixture of Caucasoid and Negroid with some Mongoloid). Any Jew claiming to be white is (usually) a liar. The only white Jews are converts. Why bring this up? It will be covered later.

"Why are you always picking on black people?!" They are the worst of the human species and I can prove it. For one, all evidence suggests that the typical Negroid is pretty unintelligent. With an average IQ of around 80 to 85, their mental capacities are just not that good. If one takes time to observe the Negroid, they will find that the Negroid is rather aggressive and prone to violence. They also lack impulse control. These two traits lead to them being trouble for other races. Here's some stats:

The city of Irvine California is considered the safest large city in the USA as of 2014. With a violent crime rate of just 46 per 100,000, it is pretty dang safe. What is the racial makeup? White alone - 98,118 (42.7%), Asian alone - 92,820 (40.4%), Hispanic - 25,573 (11.1%), Negroid alone - 3,559 (1.5%). The city of Detroit Michigan is considered the most dangerous large city in the USA. With a violent crime rate of 2,072 per 100,000, it's a pretty dangerous city. What is the racial makeup? Negroid alone - 570,808 (81.4%), White alone - 57,252 (8.2%), Hispanic - 52,421 (7.5%), Asian alone - 7,569 (1.1%). Hmm. Interesting. Of course you can look at almost any big city in the USA and notice the SAME trend: The more Whites/Asians and less Negroids, the lower the violent crime rate. The more Negroids and less Whites/Asians, the higher the violent crime rate. It is clearly seen, can be clearly proven, and is repeatable. You can take any city of any size that is majority White, flood it with Negroids, and the violent crime rate will go up. Even if you take out the same number of whites as you put in Negroids. Negroids are not even safe from themselves. It is a fact that the majority of Negroids murdered are murdered by OTHER Negroids.

"Well, crime rate is proportionate to poverty! Race has nothing to do with it, just happens there are a lot of poverty stricken blacks in the USA because of discrimination!" Wrong. When one takes a close enough look at the data, there is more of a correlation between race and crime than poverty and crime. A poor white neighborhood is a lot safer than a poor Negroid neighborhood. As for discrimination, Negroids in the USA are given MORE opportunity than whites and yet they still fail horribly at life. Is it a coincidence or is it because they lack the mental capacity to do well with the opportunities they have? If you have ever worked as a manager, you will know exactly what I mean. You will know from experience that the typical Negroid lacks intelligence and motivation. They tend to be lazy, especially when out of the sight of the superiors. If they think they can get away with something, they will try to. No intelligent person can claim that Negroids are not given preferential treatment now days in the USA. Despite such, they have made no progress in life and generally mooch off others to some degree. Some of course take it all the way and live on government/charity handouts. Some actually try and find work but typically remain poor due to bad decisions due to lacking mental capacity. Have you ever had to give instructions to Negroids? If you have, you can tell how low their general mental capacity is. The purer the Negroid, the dumber and more violent they are.

"But white people commit violent crimes too!" Of course. All races have some representation in crime. I'm not arguing that. What I am arguing is how much. The statistics and data doesn't lie. When you factor in their percentage of the population, Negroids commit the most crimes, the most violent crimes, the most rapes, the most property damage, so on and so forth. They are generally the bottom of the barrel. If you need further proof, just look at the riots that's been going on. A white cop shoots a Negroid they thought was armed but turned out they were unarmed. So a lot of the local Negroids go out and destroy their city/town. Loot, pillage, burn. However they fail to realize that Negroid cops shoot unarmed white people just as often as white cops shoots unarmed Negroids. White cops kill more white people than Negroids. You don't see us rampaging like angry gorillas and destroying our towns. Why? We aren't that violent or stupid.

Now maybe you have a little bit of an idea WHY we want a place to ourselves.

"Why did you let all these non-whites into white majority countries if you didn't want them there?" Well, we didn't. This is where the Jewish issue comes in. Anyone who takes a decent time to research the history/connections/heritage/genetics of those in high places will come to the conclusion our country and much of the world is run by Jews. The most treasonous laws ever passed had Jewish backers and was funded by Jewish money. Any treasonous law has Jewish ties. Almost all corruption can be traced back to a Jew. The Jews own all the media, they own all the television stations, they own all the radio, they own all the newspapers, they own the government (through bribes, blackmail, campaign funding, etc), they control what the majority sees. Why does it matter? The Jews have a mostly unspoken bond. Whether they are "practicing" Jews or not, they are all bound by blood (genetics) and they know it. A Jew will "scratch the back" of another Jew any chance they get. Openly they claim otherwise but the data doesn't lie. Spend any decent time researching and you will find a Jew connected to everything that is bad with the world today.

"You are beginning to sound like a Nazi! Aren't you ashamed that the Germans killed 6 million Jews?!" There is no solid evidence showing Hitler had any intention of killing ANY Jews, much less 6 million or any other figure. In fact, the Nazis severely punished other Nazis if they hurt captive Jews. Bet you never heard that one. As well, there is no evidence there were any homicidal gas chambers. In fact, the logistics of "gassing and cremating" six million Jews during the time Hitler reigned is impossible. Even modern cremation ovens can barely do 19 bodies a day (24 hours). Plus you have the issue with fuel (cremation takes a lot of fuel) and the remains left after cremation. Where did all those ashes go? "Nobody knows". The evidence does not support the claims for the Holocaust. Any intelligent and reasonable human being would consider evidence over rumor every time. Concerning the so called eye witnesses, any prosecutor will tell you that eyewitness testimony is some of the worst evidence. The mind loves to embellish and exaggerate memories. The mind is also not a perfect storage device. It may remember some basic things about an event but it almost never can remember details. Were there cremation ovens at the "camps"? Of course. People die. What do you do with the bodies of those who die? You can either bury them or cremate them. Cremation has advantages. In any group setting (such as labor camps), if you don't take care of the dead quickly, it can lead to issues for everyone in the group. The evidence supports that the camps were labor camps and typically had a range of pleasure activities for camp members to participate in. There were things like swimming pools, pianos, musical instruments, games, movies, so on and so forth. Bet the Jewish run media never told you about how many times Hitler tried to prevent war. Hitler tried numerous times to prevent war. The Jews pushed for it and pushed for it until they had it. Hitler of course made them regret it. Hitler could have won the war but he made some mistakes. That is not the point of this post though so you can look elsewhere for the data related to Hitler.

"If white people are so smart, why did they let the Jews outsmart them?" The Jews didn't outsmart our people. What they did do however is manipulate one of our weaknesses: compassion and kindness. Look at most Christians for example. Always giving to the poor, feeling pity for those less fortunate. These traits are common among our people. We also tend to be too trusting. We made the mistake of letting Jews reside among us because they looked similar to us and on the outside appeared nice. Little did we know how mean, sneaky, and manipulative they generally are. Are all Jews bad? Of course not, but most are. That is the main reason Jews even to this day screw us over. They use our weaknesses to manipulate us and they have nearly perfected how to brainwash us. This is why you should throw out your television (I did over a decade ago and it was one of the best decisions I've ever made).

"You seem to try to use logic, but what about all the Christians on your board?!" To each his own. We are not a unified body of "haters". Each of us has our own beliefs. I personally am not religious. Do I hate Christians? No. Could I ever be a Christian? Unlikely. I personally require proof and evidence and I just haven't found that in religion of any sort. Do I know what exists after death? Nope. Am I worried? Not really. Each of us is different but we are unified on some topics (such as wanting a territory of our own where we can live in peace among our own kind).

"What about homosexuals?" What about them? The evidence supports that homosexuals have a mental disorder. For a long time homosexuality was considered a mental disorder. However with time society lost their minds and began embracing people with serious and dangerous mental disorders. I will not delve into this too deeply here but being a homosexual puts you at a MUCH higher risk than the general public for dying at an early age. You as a homosexual have a MUCH higher risk of contracting an STD/STI. Statistics show as well that homosexuals are far more likely than heterosexuals to molest children. There are logical reasons to oppose the homosexual agenda. Are all homosexuals bad? Of course not. However I wouldn't want one living next door to me. The religious among us tend to point to their holy book when asked about homosexuals. I point to facts and statistics. Either way, homosexuality is a choice, is a mental disorder, and can be cured.

"Ok, so you don't like Jews, Negroids, or homosexuals, do you like anything?" Of course. We love our people and our heritage. Society (with the brainwashing from the Jew) is pressuring us to forget our heritage or even be ashamed of it. What is there to be ashamed of? If it weren't for our people, you all would still be living in huts/caves/tents. You wouldn't be typing on a computer because they wouldn't exist. You would be sweating like mad because there would be no air conditioning. You would be bored out of your mind as there would be no internet or even electricity. You would very likely live in a dangerous time with nothing better to do than try to survive. If it weren't for our ancestors, you would be living like the primitive tribes in Africa right now. Consider that next time you think about feeling ashamed about being white or the next time you try to make one of us feel ashamed. Our people brought civilization to the world. Wherever we are in high numbers, there is low crime, high civilization, and progress in the area of technology. Where we are low in numbers, there is rampant crime, no progress, and primitive tribal like gangs roaming around. I will never be ashamed of being white and I will never apologize.

WHO DAT???? #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

[On the death of Robin Williams]

Robin was murdered folks here is the numerology to back up my claim.

Look at the date GLP. 11 august. 11 is prime occult number by the Illuminati so you are correct. Williams was pronounced dead at 12:02 p.m. (1+2+0+2=5) , it said. He is age he died was 63 (6+3=9)
The Numbers of the Serpent Occult Religion.

The most venerated occult numbers are: 3, 6, 9, 11, 13, and multiples thereof, especially 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77. A triplication of numbers is also considered sacred (possibly even more sacred) to the occultist: 111, 222, 333, and so fourth. The number 5 is the number of Death; also, an extremely scared number is the double 11, as in 11:11, or 11/11/11.

The number 7 and 12 are also an extremely important number universally. Seven is a number of complement and is considered a Divine number. Seven days in a week, seven colors to the rainbow. The occult will also use this number 7, but their favorite numbers are 11 and 6. The occult avoids using the numbers and multiplications of 4, 8, 10, and 12, unless they correlate with their numbers.

THE PROOF IS RIGHT HERE!!!!

Fading Light #racist stormfront.org

Attention non-Whites:

You owe a very large debt to the White race for the technology and techniques we have invented and shared with you that have allowed your populations to grow so large. Prior to our modern innovations, your populations were essentially stagnant. We have changed that with our medical, agricultural, and industrial inventions and discoveries.

While it is difficult to assign a specific monetary value of such priceless contributions to humanity, an estimate is possible: Since your populations have been exponentiating since we shared our ideas with you, it would seem that every life over and above your prior average population has existed only because of us.

It's hard to assign a monetary value to an individual life, but the EPA, FDA, UN and several other bureaucracies have managed to do so. The average for these values is around seven million dollars, but I'm willing to give you a deal (especially since some of you are rather worthless) and charge you only $5 million per life.

Taking your 1800 population as a base line (which is again a deal for you), the number of non-White people who have lived since that time over that base value is estimated from Keyfitz's model at around 10 billion people; however, since I'm willing to be very reasonable, I will charge you for only one quarter of that, or 2.5 billion people.

Multiplying the number of additional non-White lives that my race has made possible with its creative genius by the special price on individual lives yields a value for your total debt to us of $12.5 quadrillion. Please pay, or else (and preferably) get out of our nations and don't ever come back.

In any case, you are hereby forbidden to whine about how we "owe you."

Terri Strange #sexist #moonbat thearcticfeminist.wordpress.com

Are you a woman who has previously considered yourself heterosexual or perhaps maybe bisexual? Has that come into conflict with your feminist ideals? Are you catching yourself thinking more and more about how attractive other women are? Do you get jealous when your female friends who ‘aren’t quite there yet’ talk about their totally boring nigels? Do you kind of want to put your arm around another woman, play with her hair, smell her skin? You are not alone. You may in fact be going through what many of us already have.

Political Lesbianism.

If you’ve previously considered yourself a supporter of basic human rights for gay people you may find these feelings at odds with what you’ve previously been told about sexuality. You see, we’re told by most gay rights activists that sexuality is an inherent trait, that its something we’re born with. That it cannot change. This view of sexuality makes sense if you’re fighting crypto fascists for basic human dignity. It doesn’t make so much sense if you’re someone whose going through these feelings, yet haven’t before. Or not to the level you currently are.

You see, the big con in all of this understanding of sexuality is that heterosexuality is actually a learned behavior. It is not natural. At least not in the sense it exists institutionally today. In fact, it is the very conduit by which the global oppression of womankind is taking place. Each man gets to own his own woman, or group of women depending on local custom and enjoy what amounts to nothing but glorified prostitution and drudgery from them for as long as he wants/is convenient to him and the preservation of his precious male seed.

All of this is background stuff really. I want more to talk about this phenomenon. Yes, its a phenomenon. Political lesbianism pisses a lot of people off for various reasons but it is a real thing happening, it is something that feminists go through as a result of the awakening that our consciousness brings.

Theres a lot to shed. First off there’s the nigels. Shed those things, my god knock it off with the nigels already. They can’t and won’t ever change, you’re deluding yourself into thinking otherwise.

Secondly there’s the exposure to creepy male sexuality. If you were lucky enough to choose the man who would *deflower* you. I want you to think about your first sexual experiences. They were pretty good right? Up until he stuck his penis in you, right? You were having all manner of intense sexual feelings that then had to be sublimated into doing what he wanted, right? Then there’s all the porn shit men bring into sex. If you’re a woman reading this there’s no hope for nigel to not be porn sick. They’ve all been exposed to more porn than any generation before. Porn is everywhere, it is the air they breathe and it is the shit they act out on your body. That porn reel shit they have going on when they’re “making love” to you has an effect on your sexuality and psyche. You need to work on that. Its traumatic shit and you need to get it out of your system. I can’t recommend anything in specific. For some women, reading about stockholm syndrome helps, for some women mysticism helps, for others various forms of therapy, reflection, study, meditation all help to get that shit out of your body.

To do that you’re gonna need to give yourself time. Time to heal, time to really think about what it is you want, explore your feelings. That time should be spent in celibacy. Do not pursue relationships with other women until you have began doing this work. There’s enough trauma in this world, lets not inflict it on each other, ok?

So you’ve been doing all this stuff, rethinking your sexuality, reclaiming it, etc. You’re noticing intense feelings about some women you meet. You’re attracted to them. You start to remember little bits and pieces of your life you’d buried. Times before your feminism when you were attracted to women, when you had intense erotic moments with other women. You start to realize just how much you’d been repressing just so you could make it work with nigel.

That’s what I mean when I talk about political lesbianism. I don’t really feel the need to differentiate myself apart from other lesbians except when they’re attacking political lesbians. Because I am one. I chose to be a lesbian. I was bisexual for many years. Had relationships with other women but repressed a lot of my feelings, was scared of being a dyke. It took feminism to break that shit down for me. Make me realize how trauma-bonded I was to men and how it never worked with them because it could never work with them. This choice to love women is a positive affirmation of my desire. It wouldn’t have been possible for me without feminism.

I of course, am not the only one whose been through this. That is why the concept exists.

I also believe heterosexual relationships are inherently unequal. So whether you love women or not, please, love yourself. Dump your nigel.

Ap0calypse #fundie incels.co

Actual incel definitions vs what society wants incel definitions to be

A surge of new guests and members are exploring incels.me recently, and I would like to take the time to clarify some of the confusion that has been going around, particularly about our definitions and ideology. Here are some words that are twisted by anti-unattractive male activists.

Incel
(society definition)-Hateful, violent, misogynistic male terrorist that is unable to get laid due to females around him being able to perceive his misogyny, creepiness, low confidence and bad personality automatically. They believe they deserve 10/10 females and that all women should be enslaved and have their rights taken away.
Example: You see that 10/10 6'4 male model that has sex 5 times a week? He is an incel since he says stuff that I disagree with online.

Cool Fact: According to their incel definition, it is just an anomaly that females are unable to detect bad personalities in tall/attractive males before entering abusive relationships with them. But lonely males on the internet that would actually make loyal partners are the problem.


Incel
(actual definition)-Any male who is unable to get laid due to his appearance and to a small degree, mental problems (autism, Aspergers, Actual Depression). Due to dating standards, genetics (mostly), and society, many males are unable to get laid due to their appearance. Problems like hair loss, short stature, poor eye shape, and overall facial structure are purely genetic, and have been proven to be the key factors in determining one's reproductive success. Males who are average/above average height with a decent face are not considered true incels since there will be females attracted purely to his appearance. Females cannot be considered incels due to how male biology functions. Due to their higher sex drive and other factors, males have a diverse amount of tastes in different types of women. Traits that would spell a death sentence for males will have hardly any negative effects on females. In a female viewpoint, they can consider themselves incel, but this is usually due to the fact that most men they see are invisible due to their height, face, or baldness; while tall and handsome men are the only men they desire. Since these tall handsome men are in high demand, they can by picky when choosing long term female partners and will discard so called femcels.
Example: You see that short, balding, unattractive male over there? He is an incel no matter what ideology he believes in.

Blackpill
(society definition)-"I will espouse misogyny and hatred towards all women"
Example: Hey, you are blackpilled? Why do you want to enslave all women to be your sex slaves????


Blackpill
(actual definition)-"I can identify the importance of genetically controlled physical features in males, which determines their overall happiness, dating lives, and treatment by society due to overwhelming data and past/current abuse due my appearance. If you are considered below average looking in the society you live in, your life will be considerably harder."
Example: Hey, you are blackpilled? I can see how your negative dating experience due to your short stature has impacted you life, I appreciate your viewpoint on the matter and wish you good luck.

Chad
(society definition)- Any male that is attractive to women due to his confidence, feminism and personality.
Example: I am what you incels consider a "chad". Women only go out with me because they see my meek and submissive personality as a chance to use my money and resources while giving me sex once every two months. Most of my past relationships resulted in my partner leaving me for a more attractive male, but since I am a self identified feminist I will get laid much more than any male model.

Chad
(actual definition)- Any male that is attractive to the majority of women due to his physical appearance. Males with a nice jaw, good eye area, and tall stature typically fall into this category. After years of crucial dating and socializing experience due to their enhanced genetics in their youth, they are usually very confident and outgoing, and will live happy lives. Due to the halo effect, Chads can get away with things usual males cannot in social scenarios. Also, most chads don't even need confidence to get relationships since women will go out of their way to lock them down for a relationship.
Example: I am what you incels consider a "chad". I am 6'4 with a handsome face, I can install tinder and get laid faster than you can possibly imagine. Tinder experiments have shown that I can say literally whatever the fuck I want and still have females be attracted to me.

Harun Yahya #fundie darwinism-watch.com

It is of course important to concentrate on those who carried out the Jokela and Columbine massacres and the ideas that led them to do so, but we also need to go a little deeper and consider another factor behind those events. That factor is the Darwinist education still being provided in schools. Students in the USA and Europe are taught the nonsense that life on Earth began spontaneously and that human beings are an advanced form of ape that emerged by way of natural selection, as if these things were scientific fact. The Jokela and Columbine killers were people who had received this Darwinist education provided in Western society. Therefore, although the attackers were school students, in effect the schools were themselves responsible.

christian #fundie godlikeproductions.com

The Church is saltless and rendered useless...

Those in Government do not have the Spirit of ARMOR in Christ to stand with President Trump and his cabinet who GOD allowed to rise to save the USA from Destruction...

After re-reading Revelation 17 many times IMHO the Catholic Church is not that BABYLON.. We the USA are!

THE STATUE OF LIBERTY..

It is just over 305 feet tall from the ground to the top of the torch flame. The crown has 25 windows and seven spikes. Spike That Fact! The seven spikes represent the seven seas and seven continents of the world, according to the Web sites of the National Park Service and the Statue of Liberty

And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. THE USA

And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
1.President Carter-FALLEN
2.President Reagan-FALLEN
3.President Bush-FALLEN
4.President Clinton-FALLEN
5.President Bush-FALLEN
6.President Obama-ONE IS THE BEAST
7.President Trump-he must continue a short space.

8.And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.

The WHORE of BABYLON is the FALSE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD
Jeremiah 7: tells us that..

Jeremiah False Religion Worthless
This is the word that came to Jeremiah from the Lord: “Stand at the gate of the Lord’s house and there proclaim this message:
“‘Hear the word of the Lord, all you people of Judah who come through these gates to worship the Lord. This is what the Lord Almighty, the God of Israel, says: Reform your ways and your actions, and I will let you live in this place.

But they did not listen or pay attention; instead, they followed the stubborn inclinations of their evil hearts. They went backward and not forward. From the time your ancestors left Egypt until now, day after day, again and again I sent you my servants the prophets. But they did not listen to me or pay attention. They were stiff-necked and did more evil than their ancestors.’

When you tell them all this, they will not listen to you; when you call to them, they will not answer. Therefore say to them, ‘This is the nation that has not obeyed the Lord its God or responded to correction. Truth has perished; it has vanished from their lips.

The Valley of Slaughter
“‘The people of Judah have done evil in my eyes, declares the Lord. They have set up their detestable idols in the house that bears my Name and have defiled it.

Hillary Clinton tweeted a photo of herself modeling one of the "nasty woman" T-shirts for Planned Parenthood

OnlyTheGhosts #conspiracy #ableism deviantart.com

No, it's actually brain damage. The 30% brain inflammation that's common is due to toxins in the brain. These toxins - especially mercury and aluminium - result in very fragile synapses. The synaptic pathways collapse, and the brain compensates by trying to create more pathways faster than they can collapse.

The 70% of Autistics with IQs in the 70s or below shows it's brain damage as well. 70s and below is called MENTALLY RETARDED RANGE.

Chart of mental redartation according to IQ

<table>

Level of RetardationIQ Range
MildLow 50s – 70s
ModerateMid 30s – low 50s
SevereLow 20s – mid 30s
ProfoundBelow 20 or 25

“…aluminium exposure is associated with the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and with the development of chronic oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and glial activation or dysfunction; these changes in turn are associated with ASD.”

(Aluminium in vaccines causes BRAIN-DAMAGE linked to Autism!)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5596046/

“The preponderance of the evidence indicates that mercury exposure is causal and/or contributory in ASD” (in other words, mercury – as in vaccines containing the organomercury compound Thimerosal, is linked to Autism)

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X16300931

“…the significant association between vaccination and NDDs all support the possibility that some aspect of the current vaccination program could be contributing to risks of childhood morbidity. Vaccination also remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors, whereas preterm birth, long considered a major risk factor for NDD, was not associated with NDD after controlling for the interaction between preterm birth and vaccination. In addition, preterm birth coupled with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD above that of vaccination alone.”

(NDD = refer to neurological damage, in other words *BRAIN-DAMAGE* )

http://www.oatext.com/pdf/JTS-3-186.pdf

Geier et al. 2014 J Biochem Pharmacol Res “The risk of neurodevelopmental disorders following a Thimerosal-preserved DTaP formulation in comparison to its Thimerosal-reduced formulation in the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS)” 2:64.

“This study supports a significant relationship between increased organic-Hg exposure from Thimerosal-preserved childhood vaccines and the child’s subsequent risk of a ND diagnosis.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261474301_The_risk_of_neurodevelopmental_disorders_following_a_Thimerosal-preserved_DTaP_formulation_in_comparison_to_its_Thimerosal-reduced_formulation_in_the_vaccine_adverse_event_reporting_system_VAERS

I can easily cite hundreds more.

Your crap calling what I'm saying "ableism" is just you using insults instead of dealing with the science.

I don't give a fuck about your better, kinder term. The scientists say RETARDED, that's NOT a slur. That's the term. I will not abide with politically-correct nutcases to dictate what "science" should say, any more than I would go along with the Soviet Union's propaganda or China's propaganda or North Korea's propaganda when they made anti-scientific claims.

AhlaamYasmina #fundie ummah.com

regarding love marriages. i think it might have been extensively discussed in previous threads, but you should know love is not a factor to be considered for marriage. think about it, if you marry a person today because you fell in love with them, what will happen when that love fades after a few years? or months even? will it be divorce? insha Allah you will not be in that position. however please remember akhi, love is something you build over lifetime, maybe fast, maybe slow. And the "butterflies" that you feel for that person initially is not love. So insha Allah marry your wife for her deen. that is the most important. And it is upto Allah bring that "love" and mercy between the two of you. wasalamu aleykum

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

If they don’t get that class at age 12, because they went to a Muslim school, or because they did not go to school, their expected number of children is six or seven, even if they went to a high class ladies Muslim school. If they got western education at age twelve, then they have western fertility levels, far below replacement.

There is something taught to twelve year old girls in Nepal in Western schools, but not in Muslim schools, that drops fertility from six or seven children per female to less than 1.5 children per female.

This is what Boko Haram is complaining about. They view it, reasonably enough, as genocidal.

...

Here is my theory explaining this observation:

If women are emancipated, fertility collapses. But merely legal emancipation has limited effect, because females are extremely vulnerable to social pressure and conformity, so that peer pressure, social pressure and parental pressure, can and routinely does prevent emancipation from being effective, and thus prevents fertility from collapsing.

So the Cathedral has to reach into society through propaganda in school and television, and remake society to emancipate women, then fertility collapses because the girls spend their hottest and most fertile years fucking bad boys.

If women are low status relative to males, all males look attractive to them.

If women are restrained from screwing outside of marriage, if they cannot get their hands on males and males cannot get their hands on them (except in parentally supervised dancing with parentally selected partners) they want to get married. If all males look attractive to them, they can get married, and will love their husbands.

If women get married young, love their husbands, and submit to their husband’s authority, they will have a reasonable number of children – around six or seven, if the husband can afford it.

If, on the other hand they perceive themselves as equal to males, they will look around for males that are somehow higher status – typically convicted felons and such, for example Jeremy Meeks. They spend their fertile years fucking those guys, and only when the booty calls stop, only then do they condescend to reluctantly notice someone who is inclined to support and father children. And many of them, particularly the most intelligent, the most highly educated, the most wealthy and successful, for example the infamous lawyer pussy, when they are too old to get booty calls from Jeremy Meeks any more, will find all males that might return their interest beneath their notice, and wind up as cat ladies.

...

To have eugenic population growth: Abolish welfare and put female sexuality and reproduction under parental control, until they get married whereupon their sexuality and reproduction comes under their husband’s control.

Parents will delay their daughters reproduction until their daughters get married. Parents will only allow males able and willing to support a wife and children to court their daughters, and only allow them to court their daughters for marriage, not sex.

Wealthy people will marry young, poor people will marry late.

In order to reproduce successfully, reproduce biologically and culturally, men and women have to behave in different and complementary ways.

For the family unit to function, it has to have a single head, and that head has to be the man, because women will not endure sex if they are the head. And it has to be legally and socially binding.

If, on the other hand, women are free, their natural inclination is to engage their hypergamy with a minority of males outside the family unit, which natural inclination is reinforced as the normal life course, normal behavior, by school and television, which results in non reproductive sex. Successful societies repress this, frequently employing alarmingly drastic means, but the ordinary pressures of social conformity and adverse economic and life outcomes suffice to reduce it to quite manageable levels. Adulteresses in Timor Leste are punished only by social stigma and divorce without property, rights to children, or alimony. Stoning is not required to reduce the problem to acceptable levels.

Babs9 #conspiracy #quack deviantart.com

That's cause autism didn't exist before 1943. Kenner who found the original 14?. search all data and even toured countries looking for others to fit the diagnosis and found none. Aspergers was diagnosed before 1990 but wasn't included in the spectrum until then. Still didn't account for the rise, neither did MR or similar diagnosis'. The MMR was only implicated because of the media. Wakefields study wasn't even about vaccines and the danish study used to "debunk" the vaccine autism link was not only done by Thorsen who is in the top 5 most wanted for stealing millions but the study only look at a single vaccine with no unvaccinated control groups. Autism is more common in certain races because of vaccinations. Let me explain; certain races who immigrate here are require to get the full range of vaccines in one go. That's alot for the body to handle, some of them also had received additional vaccines in their own country. They are more susceptible because they aren't used to "western society". A good example are a group of people who used to give small amounts of poison to their children over time so they would be used to it and could survive alot of toxic intake. The same is with races who are used to western medicine and the toxic environment they have been living in for generations, while others have gone generations without injections and this bombardment is very hard on their system. There is also the RH factor to consider. Those of other descent usually have a -RH factor and require the rhogam shot during pregnancy which is currently not mercury free. You really do have to take the mothers pregnancy and history into account to find the cause. Though vaccination is by no means the only cause it is the biggest. With our fluoride intake being more for children who are formula(aluminum) fed, this increases the numbers even more.

This has a pretty decent list of studies and the organization has been one of most helpful for parents looking for treatment of internal issues associated with autism instead of being dismissed by doctors

link

Another good fact to know is why boys are 4 times more likely than girls to get autism. Testosterone. Girls who have autism, when tested, have higher testosterone levels.

Though there are many tests that can be done to determine the cause of ones autism, the heavy metal and opiate urine tests should be top of the list since they are the most common factors amongst those with autism

Be Saved! #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

As everyone knows it, we are very close to a TOTAL LUNAR ECLIPSE, called the third blood moon of the 2014-2015 Tetrad on April 4 2015, and closer to the exceptional SOLAR ECLIPSE, exactly on the first day of the Spring 2015, going over Great Britain.

I want you to remember that Prince William was born on a day of a SOLAR ECLIPSE exactly the very first day of Summer, i.e. June 21 1982.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
[link to www.stariq.com]

That same year, Catherine Middleton was born on a TOTAL LUNAR ECLIPSE, i.e. a BLOOD MOON on January 9 1982.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Everyone knows that the TOTAL - BLOOD - LUNAR ECLIPSES are not common.

Everyone knows that the SUN represents the MALE aspect, while the MOON represents the FEMALE aspect.

As you can see there is something BIG brewing because it matches two people - William & Kate - having been born the very day of an eclipse (Solar for the male, Lunar for the female) and called to become the Two Witnesses when the third BLACK HORSEMAN (BLACK LIKE THE ECLIPSE) appears on March 31 2015 according to the fractal calendar of the End Times, this rider being the one of the REWARDS of the 144,000 ELECT.

Each one was born in a month starting with the letter 'J'.


The Tetrad of the End Times

The four consecutive blood moons , also called tetrad are four consecutive lunar eclipses that will appear red because total. The series of four blood moons were rare in history. And these fall precisely at the time of the most important Jewish holidays ( Passover and Sukkot ). The Passover celebrates the beginning of the Exodus from Egypt. The Sukkot marks the divine assistance received by the Israelites during the Exodus. It is therefore a matter of Chosen People. It is remarkable to see that these eclipses echoes the FOUR HORSEMEN! They always precede the period of a new Horseman, except the third - that of the Rapture of the Chosen People of God (144 000) - that it is almost simultaneous and marked by a solar TOTAL eclipse few days before this period .


These tetrads systematically preceded tribulations for Israel (and Jews in general). The last two tetrads respectively came just before the war that occurred at the time of the creation of the State of Israel (1948) and the Six Day War (1967).

What is remarkable is that a pattern emerges. We are at the eighth tetrad since the time of Jesus. That of 1948 precedes 19 years that of 1967. The latter precedes 48 years the one in which we are. The result is: 1948 in 2018!

1948 = Date of creation of Israel.
2018 = Arrival of the Antichrist who must destroy the Temple in Jerusalem in Israel according to the Scriptures.

The Temple must indeed be destroyed a third time according to Mark 13 and Daniel 9.

The second destruction of the Temple took place in 70 AD, 70 we find between 1948 and 2018, i.e. 1948 years between 70 and 2018. We find a similar pattern, in reverse, for the series of tetrads with the exile of the State of Israel in the 8th century as a result of the Arab conquest of Jerusalem: 48 years (range 796-842) and 19 years (842-861), so '4819'.

This inversion of numbers reminds us the fractal periods of the Christian era as a result of the death of Christ where time 'compresses', compared to that of the 7 seals where time 'unpacks' when Christ returns in 2014, first year of this tetrad!

The number 8 is that of Christ (Alpha is associated with the number 1, and Omega the number 8). Now, it is the 8th tetrad since his resurrection.


The second total lunar eclipse of the tetrad is Wednesday, October 8, 2014!

The first, on April 15, took place before the war in the Gaza Strip, but before the beginning of the End Times, July 22, 2014, and therefore the first period of the 7 seals and the first Horseman (White Horseman).

This second eclipse of October 8 takes place just before the start of the second period of the Four Horsemen (Red Horseman), and therefore the second seal, which starts at the anniversary date of the Battle of Hastings of 1066, battle that marked the beginning of the Kings of Great Britain with four dynasties, aka the four beasts in Daniel 9.


The third total lunar eclipse will take place on April 4, 2015 just after the start of the third seal, and third Horseman (Black Horseman).


But what will be the beginning of the third Horseman (third seal) it is especially the solar eclipse of March 20, 2015 ... at the time of the Jewish New Year of Kings, the spring equinox!

If the Jewish holidays are indeed 'modeled' on lunar cycles, it is surprising that the total lunar eclipses fall precisely on these celebrations coinciding with the fractal calendar I presented. How many Jewish holidays of this magnitude in the year, and how many TOTAL lunar eclipses per year?

There are three major Jewish feasts, plus the new year. There are an average of two lunar eclipse per year. BUT, in Wikipedia, we see that the TOTAL lunar eclipses are rare. Since 2005, here are the dates of the total lunar eclipses: 03/03/2007, 28/08/2007, 21/02/2008, 21/12/2010, 15/06/2011, 10/12/2011, 15/04/2014, 08/10/2014.

So in ten years, we have had only eight total lunar eclipses with NO Jewish holidays ... except for 2014! In this case, we have, in addition, the same scenario for 2015, AND a total solar eclipse on the Jewish New Year of the Kings in 2015. But the point I want to emphasize is that the end of March TOTAL solar eclipse 2015, which will be on Europe (especially GB) where the Two Witnesses are, coincides with the end of the period of the Second Horseman (Red) also in late March, before the third phase of the Ministry of the Two Witnesses, the Black Horseman, before that of the Rapture of the 144,000, the Chosen People of God.


Knowing that Passover and Sukkot are both related to the Chosen People of the time of the Exodus, and therefore to be the RAPTURED 144,000 (12,000 for each of the 12 tribes of Israel), ALL JEWS OF TIME OF CHRIST, we understand that the solar eclipse turning point of March 20, 2015 is the 'midpoint' between two series of total lunar eclipses. They all come BEFORE a new seal / Horseman, except just the third (The Rapture of the 144,000) which is almost simultaneous (4/4 instead of 31/3). So there is ONE HORSEMAN FOR ONE TOTAL LUNAR ECLIPSE!


Notice how, at the time of the exile of the Jews of Palestine in the ninth century, we have the same configuration as today.


Note that the sack of Rome in the ninth century, after the four Jewish holidays falling on four consecutive total lunar eclipses, strangely echoes the destruction of Jerusalem indicated in the Bible just after the coming of the Antichrist, once past the four periods of the Four Horsemen, and so these same four Jewish holidays / Total lunar eclipses. In short, history will repeat itself with a deadly accuracy.

Robert Smith #racist amren.com

How a Young Black Man Became a Race Realist

I am a 21-year-old black man. I am an atheist, a registered Republican, and a member of Mensa. Already a minority within a minority within a minority, I have yet another idiosyncrasy that puts me in an even more unusual category: I am a race realist. I believe that consistently observed racial disparities in societal outcomes are largely rooted in genetic differences, primarily differences in average levels of intelligence.

High school

This was the first time race predominated in the social climate. I started to notice people self-segregating along racial lines. But most confusingly, black students who did not conform to stereotypes were considered “Oreos:” black on the outside, but white on the inside. I remember the following comments:

“You’re so quiet. Do you consider yourself black?” This from a white classmate, genuinely confused as to why I bucked the general black trend of rambunctious and loud behavior.

A white classmate says something racially offensive in my presence and another asks, “Why would you say that with a black person standing by us?” Answer: “It’s fine; he’s white at heart!”

An Asian classmate: “You’re an embarrassment to your race.”

A group of black students are listing black classmates whom they think act white, and include me: “Yes, he’s white on the inside. He has no accent and hangs out with too many white boys.” (The person who said that flunked out at the end of the school year. He enrolled in a predominately black high school and went to an HBCU. Two months ago, as of this writing, he was killed in a black-on-black crime. There were no protests or riots carried for him, since his death could not be made to look like black victimhood. He got nothing but a few people on Facebook posting his obituary. Maybe he should have acted more “white.”)

I not only saw blacks accuse other blacks of “acting white,” but, even more often, I saw whites accuse their black friends of “acting white.” My Asian friend — of whom I was quite fond — would often say that he didn’t consider me black. I found this extremely puzzling. To me, “acting white” meant being an Uncle Tom — someone who is intentionally betraying his race and cares more about the approval of whites than of other blacks. Being called an “Uncle Tom” is definitely not a compliment. In fact, it is one of the harshest insults for a black person.

The self-hating black person is derided in black culture, as in Uncle Ruckus from The Boondocks and Clayton Bigsby from the Dave Chappelle Show. Many blacks would rather associate with a murderer than with an Uncle Tom. This is not mere hyperbole. The black community eagerly embraces thugs and criminals who destroy their neighborhoods while it ostracizes its most principled members — educated and conservative blacks.

Even more confusing, I noticed that the more intelligent blacks would be particularly prone to accusations of “acting white.” All my life I had believed that trying to come across as an intelligent and civilized person, working hard, speaking standard English, assimilating into American society, not playing the race card, and not acting like a minstrel show character were characteristics of intelligence — not traits associated with any particular race. That ghetto blacks would accuse others of “acting white” I could, to some degree, understand. After all, the more academically oriented blacks did tend to associate more readily with white people than with other blacks, who tended to be ignorant. But what was truly mind-boggling to me was how whites and Asians could accuse blacks — even their own friends — of “acting white.” Why did they mock their black friends for doing what they were supposed to do? Why were intelligent and civilized blacks so often called race traitors by both blacks and whites?

Like an idiot, I succumbed to this pressure. I came to view hard work and academic success as “white” activities. I began to take school and life less seriously, approaching it with a half-hearted attitude, as if giving it my all would be “white,” and antithetical to the very core of my identity. I tried to the greatest extent possible to distance myself from my white classmates — not a good idea at a school that is 90 percent white.

I ended up graduating nowhere near the top of my class but still got into an elite college due to affirmative action and good test scores. I felt a bit guilty for gaming the system, but I felt I experienced discrimination — because of the “acting white” comments — and affirmative action was my way of getting back at an unfair system. (The same college also gave offers of admission to two other blacks from my high school. Their level of achievement was, obviously, high by black standards but also nowhere near the level that would have been required of a white or Asian.)

College

In college it soon became clear that I was woefully mismatched. I began to doubt whether I was smart enough to work at such an elite level. Perhaps the problem was me, not society.

Other black students were constantly on the watch for imaginary racism. They felt so self-entitled they drew up a document intended to force the school to accept more students and hire more professors from underrepresented races.

I doubted my abilities to such a great degree that I decided to get my IQ tested. My FSIQ (full scale IQ) was 141 — 99.7th percentile!

image

I have included my hand in the photo to confirm that I am black.

Acting white

For years I was convinced that the major cause of black social pathology was this “acting white” accusation and the phenomenon of having to “prove” one’s blackness. It had certainly had a great effect on my life and impacted other high-IQ blacks around me. However, one day I came across a brilliant article by Steve Sailer addressing this topic.

He made the incisive point that doing well in school would not be considered “acting white” if blacks and whites had the same average IQ. That was my turning point. I realized that this was not a discrimination issue at all or even evidence of racial bias. What my white and Asian classmates meant when they accused blacks of “acting white” was not to call them “Uncle Tom” or “race traitor,” but something more along the lines of “you act more like a stereotypical white person than a stereotypical black person.” Factor in the differing average IQs, and it’s no wonder why the more intelligent blacks are often accused of “acting white.”

Of course high-IQ blacks will tend to associate more with a group that has an average IQ of 100 than a group with an average IQ of 85. This “acting white” phenomenon is exactly what one would expect when groups differing as significantly in intelligence as do black and whites co-exist: Behavior that is associated with intelligence becomes associated with whiteness.

I am now amused by how difficult it is to separate behavior that is stereotypically black from behavior that is generally associated with low IQ: making poor life decisions, failing in school, getting in trouble with the law, being loud and obnoxious, speaking poorly, promoting destructive and ignorant behavior, etc. Conversely, it is difficult to distinguish behavior that is “white” from behavior that reflects high IQ: being polite and civilized, showing emotional restraint, working hard, speaking articulately, being educated, being goal-oriented, listening to classical music, etc. It’s as though everyone subconsciously picks up on the IQ differences even if they don’t explicitly realize that what they’re noticing is different levels of intelligence.

I continued to study the question. I found that that other black members of Mensa are commonly told they are “acting white.” This pattern holds true throughout the world. High-achieving blacks in Britain hear the same thing. Successful Brazilian blacks are called the complimentary term “black with a white soul.”

I learned that literally everywhere in the world where blacks are found in large numbers, they exhibit lower rates of educational success and higher rates of criminality than other races. It’s no mystery why blacks who buck these trends are seen as different from other blacks.

I got my own DNA tested. I found out that I am 25 percent European — which is to be expected among American blacks. More interestingly, I learned that I was in the 96th percentile for Neanderthal ancestry among African-Americans. I find it amusing that I’ve so often had my blackness questioned; I’m unusually high in genetic material that is completely absent from pure Africans.

Compelling quotations

Here are a few observations by blacks that have stuck in my mind.

“Most of the people who were popular in my high school are either dead or in jail.” — my aunt

“This area was so nice when white people lived here.” — my grandmother, driving through a black ghetto

“I have been called ‘white’ my entire life. It’s a shame that just because I didn’t get high, skip class, and steal from the corner store I was thought of as a lame individual.” — a female cousin

“It’s not too often we get a young brother like you here. You’re proper. Most of the young black men I know besides you are thugs.” — a middle-aged black man I met during a summer internship

“N*ggers are terrible.” — my father, who often comes into contact with ghetto blacks in his line of work

“If it’s stupid, they like it.” — my grandmother, referring to young black people

“Why do we always have to come up with dumb shit?” — my extremely militant and pro-black uncle, lamenting black people’s proclivity for ignorance

It’s IQ, not racism

I now have no doubt about race realism. All the lines of evidence, from history to life experience, point to the same conclusion. All the usual excuses for black dysfunction are epiphenomenal and stem from the basic fact of lower average black IQ. Others viewed us as inferior because we never developed the wheel, a written language, a calendar, a mechanical device, or a two-story building. Slavery happened because whites (and Arabs before them) were able to enslave blacks; they had better technology and capitalized on the lack of black cohesion. Historians estimate that 90 percent of the slaves shipped to the New World were first enslaved by other Africans. (This is also consistent with Phil Rushton’s application of r/K theory; Africans have always shown low in-group preference.) All the usual explanations for black failure melt away once the fact of lower IQ is acknowledged. Anti-intellectual culture, poverty, bad schools, single-parent families, lack of role models, you name it — they are exactly what you would expect in a population with a lower average level of intelligence.

I certainly have learned much more about how the world actually works from great men like Phil Rushton, Richard Lynn, Steve Sailer, and Jared Taylor than I have ever learned from hucksters like Ta-Nehisi Coates, Jesse Jackson, or Al Sharpton. One might find race realism to be a depressing worldview; of course no one wants to believe that his race is much less intelligent on average than other races. But I truly believe that if you evaluate the evidence from an unbiased perspective and use logic rather than emotion, you cannot come to any other conclusion.

Furthermore, a worldview that takes into account human biodiversity is certainly more realistic and even hopeful than eternally yearning for whites suddenly to “wake up to racism” or voluntarily renounce their thirst for destroying “black bodies” — something Ta-Nehisi Coates thinks comes naturally to them. It is more hopeful than waiting for blacks around the world to stop creating “cultures of incompetence,” for which they seem to have quite a knack. It is more hopeful than waiting 250 years for the achievement gap to close or 228 years for the black-white wealth gap to close.

I now know what would theoretically be needed to close these gaps: a higher black IQ. I am free of any resentment against whites, for no matter how bad slavery, Jim Crow, or any other misdeed that whites are frequently made to feel guilty for, blacks around the world are infinitely better off than they would have been if whites had simply left them alone to live in mud huts and tote spears in Africa.

I feel empowered, for I now know that there is no impenetrable wall of white racism holding me back. In the words of the founder of logic, Aristotle, “The high-minded man must care more for the truth than for what people think.” If admitting the truth makes me an “Uncle Tom,” so be it.

As for my uncle’s question, “Why do we always have to come up with dumb shit?”, applying Occam’s razor will yield an elegant and parsimonious answer.

Sannhet #racist forum.codoh.com

Our* understanding of, and the importance we attach to, the fate of the Jews in WWII (what is now solely referred to as 'the Holocaust') (Revisionists-in-the-know might call the pair of these things, our understanding of it and the importance we attach to it, "Holocaustism") has been an evolving issue since the 1940s. I would propose that "Holocaustism," if we can date such things to single years, begins in 1978 with the Holocaust miniseries on U.S. television, which, this was before cable TV and so on, was watched by an incredible 49% share of all households who watched TV on the nights it aired (in four parts).

Before the late 1970s, the issue of the fate of the Jews was murkier, the capitalized term 'Holocaust' did not exist, and the fate of the Jews was not as hyper-emphasized as it is today and by the 1970s Germans were just as often seen as victims, or the entire war was more and more seen as a heroic tragedy than a morality play of Evil Germans gassing Jews (as it became later).

The year 1978, besides being the year of the 'Holocaust' TV series, was also the year that (1) Ernst Zundel first got involved in Revisionism -- I have heard Ernst became converted to Revisionism after reading Dr. Butz' Hoax of the Twentieth Century (published 1976), (2) The IHR was first organized by Willis Carto as a scholarly platform for Holocaust and other historical Revisionists, (3) Le Monde published Dr. Faurisson's article in which he proclaims "the non-existence" and concludes saying that their non-existence "is good news for humanity. Good news which it would be wrong to keep hidden any longer."

By the 1990s, the 'Holocaust' had largely become the cornerstone of the Western political mind. The Holocaust-Pushers seemed to have won and Zundel and the Revisionists seem to have lost, but put up a good fight with Zundel at the very front.

If you agree with we that Holocaustism begins in 1978, then next year, 2018, will make forty years of Holocaustism, and also forty years of Revisionism. Zundel was alive for thirty-nine of them, and very active for the first ten or so, somewhat active for the next fifteen or so, then in the prison systems of three countries (Canada, USA, Germany) for about seven, and quiet for the last seven (under threat of a return to prison in Germany). He will be remembered as a member of the first generation of revisionists of the Holocaustian Era. He will be remembered for being right from the very beginning, from AD 1978, or Holocaustism Year One.

Abdul-Aziz ibn Myatt #fundie ummah.com

The kuffar often proudly speak and write about the societies of the West in glowing terms, and contrast their own societies with the lands of the Muslims, claiming all sorts of benefits for these kaffir societies, and claiming how "advanced" and "better" and "civilized" the West is compared to the lands of the Muslims. Thus, they argue, Muslims should "modernize" Islam - get rid of "the extremists" within their ranks - accept democracy, give up Jihad, and then they will enjoy the many benefits of Western society.

What these kuffar fail to tell us is the utter decadence, hypocrisy, dishonour, arrogance, and inequality, which lies at the heart of every single Western nation. That is, Muslims - and others - are being presented with a propagandistic image of the West, by Western politicians, by the Media Thus, we have Amerika, in a secret report, saying:

"The Pentagon's doctrine for psychological operations specifically contemplates actions to convey and (or) deny selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning. ... In various ways, perception management combines truth projection, operations security, cover, and deception, and psyops." (Taken from U.S. Defense Department's Information Operations Roadmap, a document approved by Donald Rumsfeld.)

The kuffar shamelessly seek to manipulate us, and seek to hide the reality of their own societies - which includes violent crime, increasing and sordid domestic violence and abuse, more and more people in prison; more and more people suffering from mental and psychological problems; and increasing addiction of ordinary people to drugs and alcohol.

They seek to hide the truth that there is a real and ever-increasing division, in the countries of the West, between the wealthy and those who are only just managing to survive, only just managing to feed and clothe themselves and their families.

Let us consider some statistics that highlight some of the major problems of the West. First, Amerika has the highest number of people in Prison - over two million. That is over a million more than China, which has nearly four and a half times as many people as Amerika, and this number of prisoners in Amerika is quite startling if it compared to the number of people in Prison in Pakistan: some 90,000 out of a population of nearly 160 million. That is, in Amerika, there are over twelve times the number of prisoners incarcerated in jails compared to Pakistan, for Amerika has 738 prisoners per 100,000 people, while in Pakistan there are only 57 prisoners per 100,000 people.

In addition, in Amerika, every year nearly twenty million people use an illicit drug and nearly thirty million people receive treatment or counselling for mental health problems. How many people abuse alcohol is not known for sure, but some estimates go as high as fifty million people. This is a great number of unhappy or suffering people.

Furthermore, nearly 100,000 women per year seek treatment in the British city of London alone for violent injuries received in their own homes, and, on average, in Britain, two women per week are killed by a male partner or former partner - that is over 100 women a year. Also, in England and Wales alone, in one year, there are over 600,000 recorded incidents of domestic violence, and every minute of every day the British Police are called by a woman who has been subject to violent domestic abuse. In Russia, in one year, it was recorded that 14,000 women were killed by their partners or relatives.


What do such statistics show us? That something is seriously wrong with the West. That despite the material prosperity of such countries, there are millions upon millions of people who are addicted to drugs and alcohol, and that such material prosperity has not made people happy or solved fundamental social and personal problems, or led men to treat women with respect. Also, let us consider the utter hypocrisy of politicians in the West - like those in Italy where a recent test showed that 16 out of 50 elected representatives had taken cocaine or some other drug.

The simple fact is that the ways of the West do not work except in the minds - in the fantasies - of the kuffar.

How dare the West, in its utter hypocrisy, seek to export, by force of arms, by economic, political and financial blackmail, the ways and values of the West to other lands when it cannot even solve basic social and human problems in its own lands! How dare the politicians and Media lackeys and their supporters hold up the West as some shining example to be followed by Muslims when the societies of the West are full of drug addicts, alcoholics, anti-social behaviour, poverty, injustice, inequality? How dare the Western critics of Islam falsely claim that "Islam oppresses women" when in Britain nearly one hundred women a year are killed by their violent husbands or partners, and where every minute of every day a woman calls the Police because of violence against them by their husband or partner?

How dare the kuffar do this? Easy - for they are utter hypocrites who in their arrogance and ignorance refuse to accept the truth that the ways of the West do not work while Deen Al-Islam does indeed work. A women, for instance, is more safe on the streets of Cairo than she is on the streets of New York or London, even though Egypt is not any longer a land of Islam but only a land where there are many Muslims many of whom do strive to uphold Deen Al-Islam in their own lives.

What the hypocritical, what the arrogant, kuffar fear most of all is the establishment of Dar al-Islam: a land where Deen Al-Islam is implemented. For this land would put an end, once and for all, to the lies of the kuffar and reveal the kuffar to all the world for what they really are: arrogant hypocritical lying cowardly bullies.

These are the cowardly bullies who try to enforce their failed decadent way of life on others by invading and occupying other lands and by imprisoning and torturing their enemies - and who, despite their vastly superior military and financial resources, cannot defeat tens of thousands of poorly equipped and under-nourished Mujahideen. These are the cowardly bullies who, in their failure, cry out for more military hardware, for more troops, for more resources, for more help, to defeat the Mujahideen who they kill in their hundreds by their sophisticated bombs and missiles and tanks, but who refuse to give up - the Mujahideen that the cowardly, dishonourable, kaffir bullies imprison, and humiliate and torture when they are captured.

The simple truth which the kuffar try to conceal is that Islam, as a way of life, works: it produces an ordered, genuinely, civilized, and genuinely fair way of life.

"Do they seek honour from the kuffar? In truth, honour is with, and from, Allah alone." 3: 139 Interpretation of Meaning

This truth is shown by two recent examples. First, by the establishment of Islamic communities in Somalia. In that land, the Sharia Courts movement has brought fairness, and order, after decades of strife and injustice. They have begun to establish just communities led by fair, honourable men whom people trust and respect. They have done this with little or no outside help - inspired and motivated simply by Deen Al-Islam. Left alone by the kuffar, this land would - InshaAllah - become an example of the truth of Islam and thus expose the lies of the kuffar.

But already the kuffar are beginning their war of lies and propaganda against the Muslims of Somalia, as already the kuffar are mobilizing their forces in preparation for an invasion. Across the border in neighbouring Djibouti there is an Amerikan Task Force of some 2,000 troops, and Amerika is arming and giving aid to neighbouring Ethiopia. Soon, we shall hear Amerika and its kaffir and apostate allies call for the intervention of the kaffir United Nations, and soon there will be calls for sanctions against a people who have dared to defy the kuffar and begun to establish an Islamic Way of Life.

Soon, the Media of the West will be full of stories about how bad life has become in Somalia; about how women are oppressed; about how the implementation of Shariah is taking people back "toward barbarism" - as the politicians of the West, and their flunkeys, will give speeches about the need for Somalia to embrace democracy and "respect human rights."

We have seen all this before - with the Taliban. For the Taliban also began to establish, in Afghanistan, an Islamic Way of Life, and brought order and justice to a land where lawlessness and injustice had prevailed. Just like Somalia, Afghanistan was a poor country, a very poor country - but that did not stop the arrogant kuffar from imposing economic sanctions by means of the kaffir United Nations, sanctions which made one of the poorest countries in the world even poorer and which killed thousands upon thousands of Muslims.

What the kuffar did in respect of the Taliban was to conduct a massive, well-funded and years-long propaganda campaign - a campaign of hypocrisy, disinformation and lies. The Taliban were demonized, and tame journalists wrote story after story as tame politicians gave speech after speech condemning the Taliban and their "human rights record" and demanding the implementation of Western values, and the implementation of Western law and of "democracy": that idol, that taghut, of the West.

In the end, this campaign by the kuffar was successful in convincing most of the population of the West to support an invasion of Afghanistan by Amerika and its allies - as their similar campaign against Iraq was successful, for did not Iraq have "weapons of mass destruction" which could be launched against the West? Of course they did not, but that did not bother the dishonourable arrogant kuffar, who used every trick, every deceit, any lie, to get their own way.

For the West does not want to face the facts of their own failure - the fact about the decadence, the rottenness, of the West itself. It does not want people to know or discover the truth about Deen Al-Islam, a truth so evident in the beginning that the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan was - a gift from Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala, as Pakistan might have become such an example of Deen Al-Islam had not Amerika in its fear invaded Afghanistan and forced Pakistan into an alliance by threatening to bomb it "back into the stone age" and by bribing and flattering and giving money to its leader, the apostate Musharraf.

The West cannot afford people to see the real truth about Islam - for the whole existence of the West depends upon lies and hypocrisy; upon the arrogance and bigotry of believing that the failed values of the West are "universal" and must be adopted by Muslims and others.

We Muslims who refuse to imitate the kuffar - who refuse to bow down to them - have Alhamdulillah seen through the lies, the deceit, the propaganda of the kuffar: knowing the kuffar for the hypocritical arrogant liars that they are; knowing the West for the failure it is, and knowing Deen Al-Islam for the perfect Way of Life it is, a gift from Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala. Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala says:

"In every hardship, there is gain; in truth, with every hardship there is gain." (94: 5-6 Interpretation of Meaning)

We do not covet the materialistic way of life of the decadent West - knowing that if we rely on Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala and Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala alone, then Deen Al-Islam, correctly implemented through Sharia and by bayah to an Ameer, can and will solve all our problems, and provide us with that balanced, noble and civilized way of living which we have begun to see in Somalia, which we but briefly witnessed in Afghanistan, which existed in Al-Andalus, and which our beloved Prophet (salla Allahu 'alayhi wa sallam) established in Madina. For it is Deen Al-Islam which alone can provide us with a civilized way of living - for civilization, despite the lies of the kuffar, is about Adab, about fairness, honour, and not about material prosperity or consumer goods or about "enjoying yourself" while people elsewhere starve, are oppressed, are exploited, or are killed by hypocritical cowardly bullies. Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala says:

"Therefore be honourable: let (this) Deen be your aim, the fitrah given by Allah. What Allah creates, nothing, and no-one, can change. And this is the correct, the perfect, Deen, although many remain in ignorance of this." 30:30 Interpretation of Meaning

"You who believe, be firm in being fair - as a witness for Allah - even though it is not to your own advantage, nor to the advantage of your kin, and whether the matter concerns the rich, or the poor. For Allah is the best protector (of all). Do not just follow your own desires, for you may deviate, and turn away, and Allah is always knowing of all that you do." 4:135 Interpretation of Meaning

The simple truth we must remember is that Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala is sufficient for us - we do not need the rampant materialism of the West which has caused so much suffering for millions upon millions of peoples in the West, and which has brought so much suffering to others, through the exploitation, the imperialism, the wars, which the West has for well over a hundred years inflicted upon the peoples of this world. The West became rich, wealthy, only because of this - only because of the suffering they have brought to others; only because of their exploitation of others and of the natural resources of this planet; only because of their arrogant interventionism, their wars; their lies; their economic and political blackmail.

In their arrogance and ignorance they have set themselves up to compete with Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala - and, like, Far'uan, they will assuredly be humbled by Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala.

"The help of Allah is near." 2:214 Interpretation of Meaning)

"Undertake combat in the Way of Allah, for you will be held responsible only for what you do. And inspire the believers. It may be that Allah will restrain the dishonourable deeds of the unbelievers. For Allah is the most powerful, in both strength and punishment." 4:84 Interpretation of Meaning

"The life of this world is nothing - only play and amusement. What is best is the dwelling in the Life-to-Come - for those who possess Taqwa." 6:32 Interpretation of Meaning

May Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala protect us from all forms of Al-asabiyyah Al-Jahiliyyah, forgive us for our mistakes, and guide us to and keep us on the Right Path.

Enigmatic93 #sexist reddit.com

Stop parroting 80/20 rule. It's a myth. The real rule is 95/5.

The 80/20 rule as applied to dating stems from an ok cupid graph that said that 80% of the men are considered below average. But looking at the graph again you'll notice that only 5% of men are actually considered attractive. Just being in the top 20% means you're only average in the eyes of women and you'll still be expected to impress her in most cases. Being in the top 5% is where the fun begins. If you're in the bottom 80% you're better off not even trying and probably would be happier rotting.

EPA #fundie wistv.com

EPA chemical review would exclude millions of tons of toxins


By MATTHEW BROWN


BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) - Spurred by the chemical industry, President Donald Trump's administration is retreating from a congressionally mandated review of some of the most dangerous chemicals in public use: millions of tons of asbestos, flame retardants and other toxins in homes, offices and industrial plants across the United States.

Instead of following President Barack Obama's proposal to look at chemicals already in widespread use that result in some of the most common exposures, the new administration wants to limit the review to products still being manufactured and entering the marketplace.

For asbestos, that means gauging the risks from just a few hundred tons of the material imported annually while excluding almost all of the estimated 8.9 million tons (8.1 million metric tons) of asbestos-containing products that the U.S. Geological Survey said entered the marketplace between 1970 and 2016.

Lawmakers say the review was intended to be the first step toward enacting new regulations needed to protect the public. But critics - including health workers, consumer advocates, members of Congress and environmental groups - contend ignoring products already in use undermines that goal.

The administration's stance is the latest example of Trump siding with industry. In this case, firefighters and construction workers say the move jeopardizes their health.

Both groups risk harm from asbestos because of its historical popularity in construction materials ranging from roofing and flooring tiles to insulation used in tens of millions of homes. Most of the insulation came from a mine in a Montana town that's been declared a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund site and where hundreds of people have died from asbestos exposure.

"Hundreds of thousands of firefighters are going to be affected by this. It is by far the biggest hazard we have out there," said Patrick Morrison, assistant general president for health and safety at the International Association of Fire Fighters. "My God, these are not just firefighters at risk. There are people that live in these structures and don't know the danger of asbestos."

Asbestos fibers can become deadly when disturbed in a fire or during remodeling, lodging in the lungs and causing problems including mesothelioma, a form of cancer. The material's dangers have long been recognized. But a 1989 attempt to ban most asbestos products was overturned by a federal court, and it remains in widespread use.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health analyzed cancer-related deaths among 30,000 firefighters from Chicago, Philadelphia and San Francisco. The 2015 study concluded firefighters contract mesothelioma at twice the rate of other U.S. residents.

Firefighters also face exposure to flame retardants included in the EPA's review that are used in furniture and other products.

"I believe the chemical industry is killing firefighters," said Tony Stefani, a former San Francisco fireman who retired in 2003 after 28 years when diagnosed with cancer he believes resulted from exposure to chemicals in the pending review.

Stefani said he was one of five in his station to contract cancer in a short period. Three later died, while Stefani had a kidney removed and endured a year of treatment before being declared cancer-free.

"When I entered the department in the early 70s, our biggest fear was dying in the line of duty or succumbing to a heart attack," he said. "Those were the biggest killers, not cancer. But we work in a hazardous-materials situation every time we have a fire now."

Mesothelioma caused or contributed to more than 45,000 deaths nationwide between 1999 and 2015, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study in March. The number of people dying annually from the disease increased about 5 percent during that time.

Congress ordered the EPA review last year to gauge risks of asbestos and nine other highly toxic substances and find better ways to manage them for public safety.

In one of its last acts under Obama, the EPA said in January it would judge the chemicals "in a comprehensive way" based on their "known, intended and reasonably foreseen uses."

Under Trump, the agency has aligned with the chemical industry, which sought to narrow the review's scope. The EPA now says it will focus only on toxins still being manufactured and entering commerce. It won't consider whether new handling and disposal rules are needed for "legacy," or previously existing, materials.

"EPA considers that such purposes generally fall outside of the circumstances Congress intended EPA to consider," said EPA spokeswoman Enesta Jones, adding the agency lacks authority to regulate noncommercial uses of the chemicals.

One of the law's co-authors, New Mexico Democratic Sen. Tom Udall, disputes that Congress wanted to limit the review.

"It doesn't matter whether the dangerous substance is no longer being manufactured; if people are still being exposed, then there is still a risk," Udall told The Associated Press. "Ignoring these circumstances would openly violate the letter and the underlying purpose of the law."

Rep. Frank Pallone of New York, ranking Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said the EPA was deferring to the chemical industry's wishes at the expense of public health.

Democrats and public health advocates have criticized EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt for hiring two people - Nancy Beck, the agency's deputy assistant administrator for chemical safety, and Liz Bowman, its associate administrator for public affairs - who formerly worked for the American Chemistry Council, the industry's lobbying arm.

The council pushed back against the Obama administration's interpretation of the law, urging the EPA's new leadership to narrow its review. The Trump administration did that in June.

"Did we get everything we wanted? No. But we certainly agree the (Trump) administration put forth a reasonable final rule," said council vice president Michael Walls. Broadening the review, he added, would send the EPA "down a rabbit hole chasing after illusory risks."

The politically influential National Association of Homebuilders, which represents the residential construction industry, fears broadly interpreting the new law would lead to burdensome regulations that are unnecessary because it says asbestos disposal rules already are adequate.

Many of those regulations are based on a 1994 Occupational Safety and Health Administration finding that materials had to contain at least 1 percent asbestos to qualify for regulation. But public health experts say the 1 percent threshold is arbitrary.

"It's bad medicine, and it's harmful," said Michael Harbut, an internal medicine professor at Detroit's Wayne State University and medical adviser to an insulation workers' union.

"There's still a lot of asbestos out there," said Harbut, who helped establish criteria used by physicians to diagnose and treat asbestos-related diseases. "It's still legal, it's still deadly, and it's going to be a problem for decades to come."

Ferdinand Bardamu #racist eurocanadian.ca

The White race’s intelligence and behavior has been under intense selective pressure since late medieval times. These new environmental forces significantly increased White resilience in the face of adversity. The first of these was the Black Death that ravaged Europe from 1347 to 1351. As one of the most catastrophic pandemics in world history, it killed off one-third of Europe’s population. The evidence of bioarchaeology, drawn from skeletal analysis of burial remains from “Black Death” cemeteries, reveals that far from being random, the plague was very selective in its choice of victims (DeWitte, 2014). The weak and the elderly were at increased risk of infection. Given the strong correlation between poor health and IQ, the Whites who survived were much stronger, healthier and smarter than ever before. The dearth of peasant labor led to an increase in wages, rising living standards and the invention of labor-saving devices. This greater wealth and prosperity liberated many from the common drudgery of daily life. A century after the Black Death, the Renaissance scaled even greater heights of intellectual and artistic achievement.

The 17th century colonization of North America also subjected Whites to strong selective pressure. The first Englishmen to have disembarked on American soil had survived religious persecution in England as Puritans objecting to the “Roman idolatry” of Anglican ritual; they had survived the perilous transAtlantic voyage, unaffected by typhus or scurvy. In New England, the Puritans still had to contend with disease, the harsh winters and the “merciless Indian savages” that lay hiding in the primeval forests of the eastern seaboard. If the weak and unintelligent managed to survive the voyage, they would eventually be killed off by starvation or Indian tomahawk. This pattern of eugenic selection affected all English settlers, including those motivated by purely secular and commercial interests. By the end of the colonial period, the Anglo-Saxon in the Americas had emerged as one of the finest and most evolved specimens of the White race.

The purifying effects of eugenic selection had rapidly accelerated the evolution of Homo sapiens in Europe and North America: the fittest White men had always left behind the most offspring, but after the ravages of bubonic plague and the hardships of American colonization, their broods became larger, healthier and more intelligent. White men of lesser ability, if they were lucky enough to find mates, typically left behind few descendants, with fewer still managing to survive past childhood.

A significant increase in the population of intelligent Whites inevitably led to a rising per capita rate of innovation. This peaked in 1873, during the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901), but declined rapidly after that (Huebner, 2005). With the new science and technology, the White man was able to raise incomes, improve public health and increase longevity across the Western world. Eugenic selection for higher IQ made it possible for the White man to develop more sophisticated military technology. This far surpassed anything that had ever been developed by the ancient Greeks and Romans or even non-Whites. By century’s end, approximately 84% of the earth’s surface was controlled by the colonial empires of Western Europe. Intellectual and creative development had scaled such heights that Europe even gave birth to a race of intellectual supermen. These were the Victorian polymaths, who numbered among their ranks the colorful Sir Richard Francis Burton (1821-1890). He was a man who excelled at every subject that commanded his undivided attention. He was a brilliant writer, scholar, explorer, geographer, translator, diplomat and swordsman. A master linguist, he spoke an astonishing 40 languages and dialects fluently. This period of continuous White evolutionary development wasn’t to last forever. By 1914, the golden age of White intellectual and creative superiority had come to an end.

II: Western Intellectual Decline from Late 19th Century to Present

The general intelligence of the Western industrialized nations has declined since late 19th century, according to a meta-analysis of over a dozen reaction time (RT) studies. A cognitive, but not an economic or thermodynamic, limit has apparently been reached. There are now fewer individuals with the intelligence to solve complex mathematical and engineering problems, which is why the rate of innovation has significantly decreased since 1873. “Genetic g” - g-factor in the absence of gene environment interaction - has decreased by 14 IQ points over the course of a century, at least in the Anglophone nations of the UK, USA, Canada and Australia. This means a decrease of 1.23 IQ points per decade (Woodley et al., 2013). To eliminate the possibility of overinflated RT latencies because of hardware and software lags (Woods et al., 2015), the meta-analytic findings were adjusted for lag time. The result was that the Victorians were still faster (and smarter) than modern Western populations (Woodley et al., 2015).

Measures of vocabulary, relatively insensitive to environmental influence because of greater overall gsaturation and heritability rate, provided additional evidence of superior Victorian intelligence. A study tracked WORDSUM item frequencies over the course of 150 years. For this, a database that stored 5.9 million texts from the 1500s to the present was used. The most difficult and therefore the most highly g-loaded WORDSUM items exhibited sharper declines in historical usage since mid-19th century, consistent with declines in “genetic g” observed among Western populations (Woodley et al., 2015).

After decades of “massive IQ gains,” cognitive reversals were observed in Norway (Sundet et al, 2004), Denmark (Teasdale & Owen, 2008), the Netherlands (Woodley & Meisenberg, 2013) and elsewhere. In one study, genes associated with educational attainment and cognitive ability had declined in frequency across birth cohorts in an Icelandic population. It was estimated that a loss of 0.3 IQ points per decade would substantially affect Iceland if allowed to continue for centuries (Kong et al., 2017). James Flynn, discoverer of the eponymous Flynn effect, has acknowledged the reversal of cognitive gains in certain Western countries, especially those of Scandinavia. At a 2017 conference hosted by the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR), he admitted: “I have no doubt that there has been some deterioration of genetic quality for intelligence since late Victorian times.” Flynn has projected substantial losses of about 6 or even 7 IQ points for Scandinavia over a 30 year period. Such a reversal in intelligence would have catastrophic effects on the societies and economies of Scandinavia, now being flooded by hostile elites with Third World “migrants.”

A relevant question is: “If the post-WWII consensus acknowledges the existence of massive IQ gains over the last century, how does one explain cognitive reversal in the most industrialized nations?” This phenomenon is known as Cattell’s paradox and its solution is Woodley’s co-occurrence model. Although phenotypic intelligence has increased since WWII, genotypic intelligence has decreased. The anti-Flynn effect is really a “Jensen effect” because it has resulted in losses on psychometric g.

III: The Role of Dysgenic Selection in Western Intellectual Decline

Mass “immigration” from low-IQ regions of the globe, such as the Middle East, South Asia and Africa, have no doubt contributed to declines in the average intelligence of the West. In one recent study (Woodley et al., 2017), Third World “immigration” was associated with IQ declines in 13 different nations. High levels of Third World “immigration” are always significant predictors of Western cognitive decline; its most pronounced effects are on IQ subtest batteries with the highest g-loadings. Nevertheless, Third World “immigration” does not fully account for dysgenic selection among Western populations. Declines in genotypic intelligence occurred long before the advent of Third World “immigration,” which only partially explains the Western world’s declining IQ.

The greater fecundity of intelligent Whites, compared to the unintelligent, had always been the norm, especially since the 1400s. This changed during the Industrial Revolution; more intelligent Whites delayed having children until later in life, through a combination of abstinence and contraception, to further their educational aspirations and develop their innate potential. Medical breakthroughs significantly improved general health and nutrition, which prolonged human lifespans. This allowed less intelligent Whites to survive childhood and have significantly more children than those who were more intelligent. The rise of social welfare liberalism in the 20th century merely exacerbated this trend. As Western governments progressively taxed their wealthiest and most intelligent citizens, their wealth was unfortunately redistributed to less industrious and less intelligent members of the White race, who squandered the money as they multiplied recklessly.

More recent studies have shed further light on the negative correlation between intelligence and fertility. In one study, the higher the intelligence and socioeconomic status of adolescents, the lower their likelihood of having offspring. This dysgenic effect was more true of females than males, indicating that women become choosier the more wealth and status they accumulate (Reeve et al., 2013). Among adults, a negative correlation between intelligence and odds of parenthood was discovered; every 15 point increase in a woman’s childhood IQ would decrease a woman’s odds of parenthood by about 20% (Kanazawa, 2014). The female role in the transmission of intelligence is a substantial one because the genes for intelligence are X-chromosomal; if more intelligent women since the late Victorian period have had less children than the unintelligent, one can only expect a gradual decline in the national intelligence of Western populations.

Analysis of a large genealogical database revealed that Iceland’s national IQ had decreased over time because more intelligent Icelanders were having less children. Although IQ declines per decade were small, statistical significance is attained when viewed from an evolutionary timescale. Dysgenic fertility may potentially undermine Icelandic economy and society within a few centuries, unless it is reversed (Kong et al., 2017). Polygenic scores, which capture selection against g (such as dysgenic fertility or “immigration”), are the most significant predictors of the century-long decline in “heritable g” (Woodley et al., 2018). The “neurotoxin hypothesis,” like all environmental explanations, fails to adequately predict temporal trends in general intelligence because cognitive ability is under much stronger genetic than environmental control. The worst environmental deprivations (i.e. severe malnutrition) or the most costly and ambitious environmental interventions rarely, if ever have a lasting effect on heritable g.

Most experts in intelligence, cognitive ability and student achievement now attribute the anti-Flynn effect to dysgenic fertility, Third World “immigration” and worsening educational standards in Western countries; in contrast, they are far more unanimous among each other in attributing environmental causation to the Flynn effect, in striking agreement with Woodley’s co-occurrence model (Rindermann et al., 2016). Based on the evidence, Western intellectual decline is largely caused by a negative IQfertility gradient, with Third World “immigration” becoming an increasingly significant contributor as time goes on.

IV: The Road to “Idiocracy”

Nobel laureate William Shockley proposed a Voluntary Sterilization Bonus Plan (1972). He presented this as a “thought experiment.” This would be open to all members of the American public, regardless of “sex, race or welfare status.” For each IQ point under 100, the recipient was to be given $1000, as long as he or she was willing to undergo vasectomy or tubal ligation. This was not an original proposal, as it had been first suggested over 40 years ago by American journalist and scholar H.L. Mencken, albeit in a rather humorous context. What all of these proposals neglect, and what modern eugenicists have failed to acknowledge, is the obvious sex differential in contributions to dysgenic fertility, probably because of the natural sympathy that men typically have for the opposite sex.

The low-IQ male, unless he is among the 20% of males considered physically attractive, is permanently excluded from the sexual market. This is because of his lifelong inability to acquire the material resources that allow him to compensate for his genetic inferiority. On the other hand, the low-IQ female poses a far greater threat to the mental hygiene of Western populations, by virtue of her role as sexual selector. For the low-IQ female, there will always be large numbers of reasonably attractive males willing to satisfy her many sexual and financial needs. If the low-IQ male must be handsome or rich, the low-IQ female must only be of childbearing age if she wishes to attract a mate of fairly decent genetic quality. The Industrial Revolution brought with it substantial improvements in public health and nutrition, making it easier for low-IQ females to survive childhood, only to breed as much as possible throughout their reproductive years.

When, in 1869, Sir Francis Galton made his famous scientific prediction of declining Western intelligence based on anecdotal observation of changing Victorian demographics, what he really observed was more low-IQ females than ever before surviving childhood to satisfy their instinctive desire for maternity. This trend has continued without interruption to the present, making low-IQ females the primary driving force behind the dysgenic fertility that has resulted in declining general intelligence in Western industrialized nations. No successful eugenic policy can exist without taking this into full account. In order for Dr. Shockley’s proposal to have made any sense from an evolutionary perspective, the bonus for females should have been quadrupled or even quintupled for each IQ point under 100.

Into this volatile mixture was added feminism, a pernicious ideology that grants both unrestricted individual autonomy and reproductive choice to women who should not be allowed to breed for eugenic reasons. In recognizing that all women have the same rights, feminism reveals itself to be just as dangerous as the Third World “immigration” promoted by hostile elites. By encouraging low-IQ females to engage in promiscuity, march in “slut walks,” wear “pussy hats,” and breed prolifically - while high-IQ females delay parenthood because of their educational aspirations - feminism has merely accelerated the decline in general intelligence among Western populations, already well under way since the Industrial Revolution. As Whites get dumber, their “Western uniqueness,” including their high intelligence, creativity and ability to produce more geniuses than any other race of people, will disappear with them. This radical transformation of the underlying genetic structure of Western populations could take place within less than a 100 years. Few people recognize the fragility of Western intellectual gains because of selective pressures exerted by the Black Death in Medieval Europe and the 17th century colonization of North America. By undermining Western mental and racial hygiene, feminism threatens to return Whites to the way things were before the agricultural revolution of the Neolithic age.

Helmuth Nyborg, extrapolating from present trends and projecting them into the future, allows us to better visualize in concrete terms the post-apocalyptic scenario that awaits Western civilization (2011). He shows what happens when a racially homogeneous society like Denmark, with a population of over 5 million, is subjected to both “Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (IRDS), referring to the preservation and multiplication of the genetically disadvantaged, and “External Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (ERDS), in reference to “super-fertile” Third World “replacement migration.”

When both internal and external relaxation are combined, “Double Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (DRDS) is produced, a clear and unobstructed path to Western “idiocracy” in Denmark. By 2072, ethnic Danes will be reduced to 60% of the population, from a high of 97% in 1979; minority status will be reached by 2085. In 1979, Danish phenotypic IQ was 98, but by 2072, it is 93, having dropped 5 IQ points in less than a century. As national IQ decreases, Denmark will be gradually transformed into a Latin American “banana republic.” Ethnic Danes, demoralized by feminism and social welfare legislation, will have no choice but to acquiesce to the destruction of their own country. Significant damage to the economy and educational infrastructure are to be expected; a 5 point drop in Danish IQ means a 35% reduction in the nation’s GDP. Democracy will inevitably become unsustainable as average national IQ plummets below 90; it will be replaced by the authoritarian political culture and religious dogmatism found in Middle Eastern, African and Latin American societies.

Belief that “more White babies” are the answer to dysgenic fertility among Whites is just as dangerous and genocidal as the liberal belief that Third World “replacement migration” is “cultural enrichment.” Since low-IQ females leave behind more offspring than those of high IQ, more White births would reduce high-IQ females to an “endangered species.” This would intensify the “Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” already occurring in Western populations. As Whites “devolve,” they will no longer be able to maintain their own Western industrialized societies. A demographic transition of such magnitude would transform Western Europe and North America, the Occidental heartland, into a cultural and biological extension of the Third World. Since women are loyal to wealth and power, but not race, one can expect genocidal levels of miscegenation between White females of low intelligence and the non-White foreigners who have dispossessed Whites and conquered the West.

To reverse the process of dysgenic selection, the White man must do three things:

He must get rid of the hostile elite.

He must forcibly repatriate all Third World “migrants,” including their descendants. Forced “remigration” is not an unrealistic policy; mass population transfers have been successfully carried out before, i.e. deportation of Germans, 1944-50, from Eastern and Central European countries to Germany and Austria.

If selective pressures in medieval Europe and colonial America led to the steady eugenic improvement of Western populations, making it possible for them to conquer 84% of the globe’s surface, only their re-emergence will reverse the dysgenic selection that has bedeviled the White race since the mid-19th century. This can only be accomplished through a rigorous application of classical eugenic principles.

If the White race is to survive, only its strongest and most intelligent members must be prepared for the harsh Darwinian struggle that lies ahead. Wasting precious resources on mental and genetic defectives is sheer pathological altruism. Race-conscious Whites have a collective interest in raising healthy and intelligent offspring, but no such interest can exist when it comes to those who are weak and unintelligent. They are “life unworthy of life”; even they would not consent to such a truncated and meager existence if given full possession of their normal faculties. From a White nationalist perspective, to bring such children into the world is selfish and morally irresponsible; they impose unnecessary fiscal burdens on Whites and use up resources that are better invested elsewhere.

The race-conscious White man is faced with a dilemma: because of liberal elite hostility to his own ethnic genetic interests, any program of eugenic enhancement would be outlawed under the current totalitarian leftist order; at the same time, he cannot simply wait out the elite-managed decline of Western civilization. In less than a few generations, most of his race may become drooling mental defectives, if they haven’t already miscegenated themselves out of existence into the burgeoning mass of Third World “migrants” who now infest his homeland. If he must take action, he must take it now, otherwise all is lost.

Race-conscious Whites must abandon all leftist-controlled urban areas to “live off the grid.” By colonizing relatively unpopulated areas of North America and Western Europe, the White man will return to a rustic existence, filling the countryside, the mountains, the forests, the tundra with Whites only settlements, similar to the Boer-only settlement of Orania in South Africa. Living the way his ancestors did centuries ago will ensure that no Third World “immigrant” follows him into the mountains or the wilderness. Self-imposed hardship will further intensify Darwinian selective pressure on Whites, jumpstarting the process of natural eugenic enhancement, just as it did during the early colonization of the Americas. Once race-conscious Whites have become sufficiently numerous, they must embark on a program of state-sponsored eugenics. This will be used to strengthen the White population until they are able to wrest control of North America and Western Europe from the hostile elites and their army of greedy “migrants.”

The new ethnostate will be constitutionally grounded on Aristotelian political philosophy and neoDarwinian biology; it will be a meritocracy based on eugenic principles. Eugenics, the scientific ideological core of the new White nationalism, is easily reconciled with the aristocratic political science of Aristotle; both are concerned with the development and formation of the best possible citizen, one along genetic and the other along characterological lines. Aristotelian philosophy is based on a linear hierarchical conception of reality; this overlaps with the dominance hierarchies of the animal kingdom and of all human socio-political organization. Furthermore, the capacity for superior moral development is improved substantially by superior genes. In an Aristotelian political order informed by eugenic principles, the state would ensure that all citizens have both the mental and physical capacity to live the good life. Mandatory genetic screening would be one of the conditions of citizenship; those at risk of transmitting hereditary diseases or conditions, such as criminality or low IQ, would undergo compulsory eugenic sterilization. Only the best and most virtuous citizens, the biologically and intellectually superior “aristoi” or natural-born aristocrats, would be the ones allowed total freedom of action in the political sphere.

In the ethnostate, the aristoi of the White race will determine who must give birth and who must be sterilized. These men are not petty bureaucrats, but aristocrats selected on the basis of health and IQ. Their sole task is the promotion of White racial survival, whatever the cost. For those who believe eugenic sterilization is barbarous and cruel, allowing the birth of children who suffer from mental retardation or cystic fibrosis is much, much worse. For this reason, only the healthiest, high-IQ females will be allowed to breed, even being massively incentivized to do so. Encouraging the natural increase of healthy, intelligent Whites, at the expense of the low IQ and genetically unfit, is the most White nationalist thing a White man can do for his race.

Some will necessarily object: “But state-sponsored eugenics will infringe on individual rights and freedoms!” This is a common, but groundless objection. The “right to procreate” is not an absolute. In 7 utilitarian ethics, rights are never ends in themselves; they exist to maximize the happiness of the greatest number and must be tempered by social obligation. Furthermore, not all men have the capacity for individual freedom. The Greek philosopher Aristotle recognized the existence of natural slavery because of the inability of some to reason autonomously, even though they may be responsive to reasoned instruction. Whether a man is free or not must be determined by his capacity to reason (for us, his IQ).

Legislation regulating some of the most intimate areas of our lives is hardly controversial; if we allow government to enforce this legislation, ostensibly in the interest of public safety, why not allow government to decide who gets to reproduce and who doesn’t? If the low IQ and genetically unfit are allowed to breed recklessly, as they do now, Western civilization will eventually be reduced to smoldering ruins. Unregulated breeding is far more dangerous than any black market specializing in the sale of illicit firearms or drugs. Society would be much safer if it allowed every citizen to acquire large arsenals of weapons without special licensing, but criminalized the marriage and procreation of the low IQ and genetically unfit.

If a large minority of race-conscious Whites emigrate, seceding from the leftist totalitarian state to independently pursue their own racial interests, reversal of dysgenic fertility and Third World “immigration” may be accomplished within a few generations. As race-conscious Whites strengthen their race through genetic enhancement, the totalitarian left will get weaker, forced to increasingly rely on low-IQ Whites and “migrants” for manpower. From their bases in the Pacific Northwest or Lapland, race-conscious Whites, stronger and more intelligent than ever before, would raid globalist-occupied territory, slowly enlarging their own dominions until the reconquest of North America and Western Europe has been completed. This is not without historical precedent. Medieval Spanish Christians, reduced to a small area of their own country, seized the emirates of Mohammedan Andalusia one by one, until the last emirate of Granada had been defeated, its Moorish inhabitants expelled from the Iberian peninsula in 1492.

Race-conscious Whites must live, think and breathe race, just as they did during the long and distinguished reign of Queen Victoria, when Whites were at the peak of their intellectual and artistic powers. In this age of drab multicultural uniformity, the White man’s race is his most formidable weapon, a thorn in the side of those who wish to replace him with the low IQ peasant masses of the Middle East, Africa, South Asia and Latin America. Nothing terrifies the hostile elites more than the prospect of encountering race-conscious White men bred for superior intellect and physical strength, able to aggressively pursue their own racial interests undeterred by elite and non-White hostility.

adolf512, Restart80 & G-Flake #sexist #transphobia yourenotalone.co

(adolf512)

You are more likely to reproduce if you go trans

Some gay and bisexual women like dick and by going for a transbian they will be able to start a family with their partner.

You just need to bank your sperm before starting HrT.

If you dont transition the probability of you reproducing is almost zero.

This applies to the bottom 10% of males.

(Restart80)

Probably meant sex with guys.

I think being trans does raise your SMV with regard to bisexual females, marginally. And it likely raises it more than that with regard to bisexual males.

On average, non-trans heterosexual males are considered garbage tier. The lowest SMV of any group (on average) in 2019.

(G-Flake)

My account wasn’t able to log in through Facebook, but anyway, let’s pretend for a second that @pong_lenis is totally serious and worth arguing with. Yes trans people who want to be women should transition. This is why:
“For me, I have absolutely no regrets about transitioning and it has made me a million times happier.”

https://youtu.be/NdueL-0LS3Q?t=37

While I wouldn’t necessarily discourage anyone from transitioning, I dislike how much many people in the trans community encourage people to transition. Your quality of life is going to vary GREATLY depending on these factors:

How well you pass (ie whether it’s obvious you’re trans or not)
Where you live (San Francisco vs. Saudi Arabia…or Alabama - especially if you don’t pass)
Your financial situation (MtF is particularly expensive and you might also have problems finding a job - especially if you don’t pass)
Whether you have supportive friends or family (A disproportionate number of homeless teens are LGBT because their parents kicked them out of the house)
Your current relationship status (divorce is common enough without throwing trans into the mix…and finding a new partner will be harder if you don’t pass)
Did I mention the thing about passing being important?

Personally I kind of agree with you. MtF is really expensive and the ones who don’t pass look weird as fuck. Like imagine an NFL linebacker with a wig and lipstick (and no FFS). I mean I consider myself LGBT friendly but I wouldn’t want to date or have sex with someone who looks like that. And yeah, if they looked like that at a job interview I could totally imagine them being discriminated against. It must suck to be a non-passing trans person. But yeah, I agree that those are definitely things to consider.

Yeah. “Uncanny Valley” is what it’s sometimes called. The term was originally applied to androids who look sort of human, but not convincing enough. It’s sort of off-putting.

It’s not a justification for hate, but I think that’s a big part of what’s driving it. People then rationalize their feelings by saying it goes against the “natural order”, but I think it makes them feel uncomfortable.

Even I feel that way to a certain extent and I’ve heard other trans women say the same thing. There ARE plenty of guys into trans women enough that they don’t care, but trans women don’t wan to date those guys lol. While I understand, I don’t really feel sorry for them. I’m actually planning on doing a video about “chasers” on my channel.

Kerwin Brown #fundie renewamerica.us

[In a thread titled "Woman are Dirt" kerwin goes off topic to explain why a woman's brain is allows them to be better cleaners than men. He even attempts to show scientific proof.]

This is off topic. Has anyone ever considered that the average woman is wired to be more artistic than the average man because of the difference in brain function between men and women. Being artistic women notice dirt more and work to resolve the problem while men have trouble noticing there is a problem in the first place. Let's a man who is not artistically inclined cleans a room and then a woman who is artistically inclined comes behind him and cleans it again. To a man he just wasted his time. The average man is never going to clean as good as a woman because his brain is not constructed to do the job while her's is.

Bharatiya Janata Party, Shiv Sena and numerous Maharashtrian occultists and tantriks #fundie thehindu.com

Maharashtra, considered one of the most progressive States in the country, has reported cases of at least one human sacrifice per month on an average in the last one year. Of the 104 cases registered in the first year after the previous Maharashtra government passed the Anti-Superstition and Black Magic Act in December 2013, activists have pointed out 15 cases of human sacrifice.

The Act, before it was passed by the Maharashtra Legislature, was termed by the then Opposition parties, the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Shiv Sena, anti-Hindu. The Opposition had stalled the Assembly proceedings for several times in protest against the Act.

However, data gathered from across the State has shown that using the Act’s provisions, activists and the police have prevented possible human sacrifices in seven cases.

“We had been saying that such incidents do happen in Maharashtra and that is why we needed the Act. Now it is time to implement the law more effectively to curb such inhuman practices,” said Krushna Chandgude of the Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmulan Samiti (MANS). Mukta Dabholkar, daughter of the late rationalist Narendra Dabholkar who had first proposed the law, said the fact that seven cases were prevented itself showed its importance.

Rubbishing claims that the Act was against Hindus, Ms. Dabholkar said around 20 cases had also been registered against occultists from the Muslim community. Mr. Chandgude pointed out that most of these murders were committed after tantriks claimed that the sacrifice would bring hidden treasure. “Poverty and lack of education are certainly the reasons behind these crimes. There is a need to propagate scientific temper,” he said.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

Senior Management: the harem kings.
Management: the first wives.
Accounts Support: the inner circle concubines.
Sales Support: the trafficked East European sex slave.
Support Team: the royal penis washers.
Account Managers: the threesome coordinators.
Business Managers: the young dick sucking upstarts.

There you have it, the modern corporate harem, in all its flowcharted glory. Seven women per one high status man. A more illuminatingly succinct snapshot of the Western sexual market aligned with the globalizing economic market you won’t see. The only surprising thing about it is the lack of any land whales or witches among the female staff. This is Britain; you’d have to spend years scouring the countryside to find and place that many bangable women under one corporate umbrella. So you know a lot of hard work went into developing a staff that looks like a country with all its men and war pigs removed.

The other thing that’s missing from the chart: Beta males, the invisible demographic.

The four kings at the top of the Spermular Solutions organization may or may not be boffing their happily indentured servants (but if you had to bet…), however the exact dimension of their relationships with their underpantslings is irrelevant in the bigger scheme. These women are, no doubt, enthralled by the power of their male masters. They don’t need to be taking their masters’ cocks to experience the same feeling of submissive joy that a real concubine would feel. All those women are de facto harem girls, at the beck and call of their four alpha kings, gossiping and tittering amongst themselves like court mistresses to determine who is the favored girl of the moment.

This social and quasi-sexual dynamic, playing out across corporate hierarchies all over the West, pollutes the minds of women and renders them less able to appreciate the dull ministrations of the less-than-senior-management beta males that buzz about them outside the office. In the company of beta males, a de facto corporate harem girl is emotionally aloof, cocksure, unfeminine, petulant and entitled. She has felt the presence of a real modern king, a maestro of the symbol manipulation secret society, and now peasant men simply won’t do. So she lashes out at the piss bucket boys with undirected, malevolent spite, for their naive importunings fill her with disgust. Who are these nobody betas, to consult her? She has warmed the cock…les of a king’s heart! No commoner’s girl is she!

What the corporate West is becoming is a soft concubinage of a few alpha males and many attractive female HR drones whose job it is to protect the privilege of the transnational globalists by acting as a gatekeeper against infiltration by wrong-thinking elements and potentially powerful competitors. That’s the real story behind the graphic above: the total disenfranchisement of the West’s beta males. If the poor bastards can’t be disappeared the old-fashioned way, drive them out with “anti-discrimination” sophistry.

Naturally, foul feminist cunts and their bubble-headed beta male toadies immediately saw a “glass ceiling” at work in this corporate chart. For them, a workplace that is 90% female is discrimination against women if the top four positions are held by men. All the lesser men who are missing from the bottom 90% ranks are completely forgettable, nebulous specters resembling some human shape and form. Beta males? Who? What? Is that a new social media app?

I have a helpful reminder for the feminists and kingpin ruling elites waving victory signs and placards demanding further concessions from the sexless masses of men who have little left to sacrifice: When you lock out 90% of men from productive society, really bad things tend to happen in the wake of your short-sighted selfishness.

Gilamut #racist stormfront.org

(NOTE: Part of a larger post)

The pillars of the pro-White cause... here's my take:

1) The uncompromising preservation of racially White societies, which exclude all other races, within the current territories currently recognized as White nations:
All of Europe (includes Cyprus, Georgia, Armenia), Siberia, Canada, USA, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile and southern Brazil. Further additions once "clean-ups" are done can include Anatolia and Eastern Thrace (today's Turkey) for the Greeks, and Kazakhstan for the Russians.

This principle tells a very important message: NO FALLING BACK. No "Pacific Northwest", no "permanently abandoning big cities to the non-Whites", no... all our territory is inalienable.

2) The uncompromising preservation of the White family as the only acceptable social unit just above the individual. That means that the ONLY valid definition of a White family = father, mother and children. Of course re-built families can exist, and single mothers are to be helped by their fellow White citizens since, frankly, **** happens and not all couples work out, but those are normal happenings. ]

2.1.) Based on the definitions of principle 2, the condemnation of White folks who DECIDE not to have children at all for financial or social advantages, and the taxation of those people as social punishment ("They want to avoid having kids so they can make a lot of money, we'll take that money surplus and a bit more").

2.2.) Based on the definitions of principle 2, the condemnation and total exclusion of all people who declare themselves or act like faggots, lesbians or other deviants such as "transgenders", "transsexuals", "transvestites", and others who can be regrouped in the category of transformers. The physical annihilation of all pro-fag groups, marches, parades, clubs and other gathering places and lobbies. The exile or execution of repeat offenders.

3) The principle of religious tolerance within the bounds of traditionally White culture. Christianity in all its forms (except "Judeo-Christianity"), original European paganism (Roman, Greek, Slavic, Celtic/Druidic, Germanic, Dacian, etc.), various Eastern beliefs which stem from original White civilizations and are personal in nature (Vedic/Hindu beliefs, Buddhism), and finally Agnosticism/Atheism.

3.1) As a counterpart to point 3, the uncompromising rejection of all invasive non-White religions and lifestyles, all financial scams disguised as religions, and various cults which seek to suppress an individual's position in White society. Examples of proscribed religions & pseudo-religions include Islam, Judaism, Judeo-Christianity, Scientology, and various suicidal and/or personality cult groups.

4) The establishment of an economic system based on White self-sufficiency. By this I mean Whites trading with other Whites and being independent of the non-White world in all except a few secondary resources. By secondary resources I mean diamonds, cocoa, coffee, some spices, which can be obtained though very limited trading with a few non-White nations.

4.1) As a counterpart to point 4, the condemnation and arrest of all those guilty of destroying White economies for their own personal profit, by practicing outsourcing and other treasonous actions guided only be greed.

5) The creation of societies in which every adult individual who has finished his studies/training works for a living, cannot depend on the state for hand-outs, and is a member of a whole greater than himself. The preservation of individual responsibilities, but balanced with collective duties and the creation of a true sense of community, where all help those whom fate has hurt in one way or another (for example, if your house burns down, we all get together and work to rebuild it).

6) The elimination of the stagnant dinosaur that is socialist bureaucracy, and its criminal counterpart, crooked workers' unions and student associations. The replacement of such a system with a much leaner White government based on providing high-quality services to the population, maintaining infrastructure, protecting the borders, giving an economic nudge in this or that direction if necessary, and encouraging research and technological innovation.

I may have missed things, so please, everyone, contribute and give ideas.

Michelle Malkin #fundie vdare.com

The left has concocted a lucrative category of politically correct victims: "climate refugees." It's the new Green racket.
U.S. taxpayers will now be forking over untold billions to ease the pain allegedly inflicted on "carbon's casualties" by industrial activity. By contrast, those who have suffered as a direct result of government incompetence by federal environmental bureaucrats continue to get the shaft.

Consider the plight of two tribes: the Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw in Louisiana and the Navajo Nation in New Mexico.

LOUISIANA2-superJumbo-v3The New York Times splashed a viral story on its pages this week spotlighting the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's $48 million grant to Native-Americans who live in the flood-ravaged coastal community of Isle de Jean Charles. About 60 residents, the majority of whom belong to the Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw tribe, will be resettled to drier land.

That's a whopping $800,000 per "climate refugee!"

Never mind that the Times' propagandists themselves admit that erosion on the island began in 1955 as a result of land-use and land-management factors that had nothing to do with climate change.

"Channels cut by loggers and oil companies eroded much of the island," the paper reported, "and decades of flood control efforts have kept once free-flowing rivers from replenishing the wetlands' sediments."

Never mind that there are conflicting scientific analyses on the extent to which man-made greenhouses gases have caused sea levels to rise; whether the rate is accelerating; and how much, if any, reducing carbon emissions would actually mitigate purportedly rising sea levels.

Never mind that enviro-alarmists have conveniently changed their tune from blaming global warming for causing sea level rises to blaming global warming for causing sea level drops.

Oh, and never mind that many of the inhabitants of Isle de Jean Charles—whose forefathers originally moved there to escape forced government relocation under the 1830 Indian Removal Act—don't even want to leave and have fought resettlement efforts for decades.

Obama's social engineers are already plotting how to replicate the climate change relocation program. "We see this as setting a precedent for the rest of the country, the rest of the world," declared HUD official Marion McFadden, who is running the program.

Even worse, the United Nations is looking to preemptively "address extreme weather displacement" by targeting refugees even before any apocalyptic event has caused them to seek refuge.

Can you spell "manufacturing a crisis"?

While these meddling liberals conspire to displace one tribe in the name of saving the planet, another tribe is still begging for help after Obama's destructive EPA poisoned their waters.

It's been almost eight months since an Environmental Protection Agency contractor recklessly knocked a hole at the long-abandoned Gold King Mine in Colorado's San Juan Mountains. You should know that Washington has long schemed to declare it a Superfund site, which would increase its power, budget and access over the region.

A federally sponsored wrecking crew poking around in the mine last August triggered a 3 million-ton flood of bright orange gunk into the Animas River. EPA's blithering idiots delayed notifying local residents for 24 hours and downplayed the toxic spill's effects.

Downstream, the muck seeped into the San Juan River in New Mexico, where the Navajo Nation lives and farms. The impact on drinking water and livelihoods has been catastrophic. But the Obama administration refused the tribe's request for disaster relief from FEMA last fall and yanked emergency water tanks the EPA had supplied for Navajo livestock.

Incel Wiki #fundie incels.wiki

Macropenis dilemma

The macropenis dilemma refers to the mismatch between the average penis size and the most common ideal penis size in women. Surveys show that a woman's ideal erect penis size is 6.4 inches. This is despite the fact that the average erect penis size is 13.12 cm (1.66 SD); (5.16 inches). An erect penile length measuring 2.5 SD+ more than average is considered a macropenis. Hence, macropenis can be defined as a penis whose erect length is at least 17.27 cm.

This means that a woman's ideal penis size is actually only 1 centimeter away from the medical condition of macrophallism. In other words, women's ideal penis size is for men who are medically defined as being in the abnormal range, hence giving further credence to the Pareto principle.

Jeffrey J. Wolynski #crackpot #conspiracy vixra.org

Functional Groups in Stellar Metamorphosis

[contact info omitted]

Abstract: According to the biostellar evolution principle, as a star evolves life forms and evolves on it. This means all major organic chemical processes occur inside and on the star as it evolves, thus the vast majority of organic functional groups in the universe are formed inside stars as they evolve. Stars directly form life and all organic compounds, molecules and material as they evolve as is predicted by the general theory of stellar metamorphosis.

Per Wikipedia:

In organic chemistry, functional groups are specific substituents or moieties within molecules that are responsible for the characteristic chemical reactions of those molecules. The same functional group will undergo the same or similar chemical reaction(s) regardless of the size of the molecule it is a part of. This allows for systematic prediction of chemical reactions and behavior of chemical compounds and design of chemical syntheses. Furthermore, the reactivity of a functional group can be modified by other functional groups nearby.
image
Organic chemistry is the study of the compounds of carbon. These compounds of carbon include halogens, sulfur, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and phosphorus. All of these functional groups form in extremely large quantities in the atmospheres of evolving stars, per the general theory. They form in Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus but in different quantities per the star’s stage of metamorphosis, as well as react differently when introduced to different compounds which form as the star evolves. The essence of organic chemistry belongs inside of cooling stars (mislabeled things like planet, or brown dwarf by the dogma). As well, per the astrochemical principle of planet formation/stellar evolution according to stellar metamorphosis, it is stated that the majority of thermochemical, electrochemical and photochemical reactions take place in stars as they evolve into planets (old stars), not in the interstellar medium. https://vixra.org/pdf/1602.0309v2.pdf Not only that, but the precursor functional groups via sheer magnitude of material being mixed is what allows for the complexity principle of microbiology to hold ground. The microbiology of a star increases in complexity as it evolves. https://vixra.org/pdf/1608.0073v1.pdf
So what we have here are a series of basic principles put together in a way that breaks the mentality of astronomers in their assumptions that stars are not the source of basically all organic molecules and organic chemistry.
For readers who want to understand what is happening, astronomy is changing extremely rapidly, and working astrophysicists and astronomers are caught between a rock and a hard place. On one hand, they know of this major scientific discovery, in that it explains what happens as a star evolves into a life hosting star called, “planet”, but on the other none of them can speak of this issue for fear of retribution and blacklisting/career damage done when bringing it up. Remember, astronomers have to accept that stars are fusion reactors that are billions of years old, or else they get fired from their jobs. As well, planets have to form in disks around young planets (stars) or else they get fired. They cannot go against their peers and the people who sign their paychecks, but you can. You can tell people of this discovery, that stars are young planets.
image

Rev. Ronald E. Williams #fundie fbbc.com

[From "The Dating Dilemma" - Bolding mine]

I have often wished parents could see their youngsters at school or Bible camp without the youngster's knowledge. Parents would learn a great deal about the impact these premature boy-girl relationships have had on their sons and daughters. I have observed at camps for example that many girls get up one and two hours before reville. To pray? Memorize Scripture, read their Bibles and meditate on Scripture? No, if this were true, we would certainly have different camps. The reason for this zeal to get out of bed is to "put on their face" with painstaking care so as to best be able to attract the latest cute boy they are chasing.

How popular would camp be if everyone knew in advance only boys or only girls would be in attendance? At the very least, I believe it is incumbent on us as Christian leaders to prevent and discourage this fleshly nonsense, such as different times for swimming of boys and girls, seating at all events, chapels, meals, etc., segregated by sex, no physical or contact sports with mixed sexes, etc.

[...]

My children know they will never be allowed to date a person their parents are not actively considering as genuine marriage-material for them. And then, dating is with a no-touch policy and is always chaperoned.

In other words, such dating would not occur until after high school and would be under strictly controlled circumstances. Moreover, the person dated would only be a candidate previously considered, prayed over, and enthusiastically approved by the parents, not someone chosen by the emotional whims or fleshly likes of our children. Most youngsters know far more about driving a car than they do about how to choose a marriage partner.

What a relief for a youngster to know that they are not allowed to participate in frantic boy/girl relationships! They can actually concentrate on the responsibility of becoming the youngster God and their parents want them to be instead of being involved in this popular, fleshly distraction. Some youngsters are battling with feelings of insecurity, low self-image, rejection, etc., because of the intense social pressure among their peers to conform in this practice of dating. They believe they are a failure if they do not measure up to the standards of the group.

Mom and Dad, if you would prevent this dating game in your youngster's life, you will probably see improved academics, family relationships, spiritual growth, and emotional stability instead of wondering about their loyalty, thought life, and whether they will keep their purity through high school. One cannot find what we call dating or pairing off in the Bible with the possible exception of Sampson in the Book of Judges. And he stands out as a strong warning against the indulgence of flesh. Whereas he was physically the strongest man in the world, he was weak in controlling his desires and emotions which ultimately cost him his testimony, his eyesight, his honor, and even his life.

Fathers, please do not expect your virile, immature young son to control his emotions and rein in his flesh when a woman's whorish ways can even overcome many "strong men" (Proverbs 7:26), and absolutely destroy them. What he needs is a Dad who will say no to dating and pairing off for his boy and careful guidance about parentally approved, chaperoned dating when he is ready for marriage. Youngsters need parents who will be looking for prospective marriage candidates on their behalf, parents who will look for character, compatibility of families, spiritual qualifications, who would compliment their child, etc. A levelheaded, Holy Spirit directed parent is far more qualified to seek marriage prospects than a teenager with roller coaster emotions, newly functioning glands and who is filled with desires very difficult for him to control.

Parents, you can have your daughter wear a white wedding gown and not be a liar about the purity it represents. Your children can come to a wedding altar pure, having never even touched their spouse if you love them enough to lay down some rules and assist them through this potential pitfall of life called dating. It not only is devastating to emotions and to moral purity, it is a colossal failure in terms of producing strong, stable marriages. One only has to look at the overloaded divorce courts to see the awful results of dating and the marriages that resulted from this modern American practice.

flyingdonkeydong69 #homophobia removeddit.com


Introducing an already existing character as gay is pointless and pandering


Before you go and downvote my post into oblivion, let me state a few things first:

I have no problem whatsoever with any characters in Overwatch being "on the spectrum" other than the timing at which they were announced.

I have no problem with anyone associated with the LGBTQIAA+ community. "Live and let live" is my motto, so this rant/discussion post isn't hate-fueled.

With that out of the way, lemme get to where I'm coming from:

Back on Jan. 8th of this year, Overwatch released the promotional book 'Bastet' for Ana's Bastet Challenges. Near the end of the book, it's subtly revealed that Soldier 76 was once in a gay relationship.

Yeah... okay... so?

In all honesty, when I read that part the second time and understood what it meant, I kinda just rolled my eyes and heaved a sigh. There wasn't really any evidence leading up until now that Soldier 76 was a homosexual, and it seems like it was just dropped in there to "spice up" the already spicy Overwatch universe. It's exactly like Tracer's homosexual reveal: no lead up until it's dropped on us.

Like, why is this done? Apart from there being no reason this would change these characters for the worse in-game, it doesn't change them for the better either. It's just an "oh hey, also THIS" moment, and seeing how Overwatch has next to non-existent lore, I find that this is only done as a pandering move.

If you're going to have a gay character in your game, go for it! As long as they don't have "being gay" as their sole personality trait (because, tbh, people like that just put a bad name on the community anyways), I won't give it a second thought! But for the love of God, PLEASE create them as gay from the get-go of your game's creation, because this whole "drop it on them years into the existence of the game" crap is really annoying, and it makes Blizzard look like corporate shills.

Anyways, that's my POV. Again, it's not because I "hate gay people", or I'm a "homophobe", or anything like that. I'm just expressing my own opinion in what I hope is the community where it'll be heard the most. If you made it this far, thanks for at least reading before downvoting (if you did).


We just learned Reaper had a family and is therefore straight. We also learned Torbjorn has a wife. Is that needless pandering because they didn't outright state "He like women" the first time he was on screen

No, that's not pandering. Let me explain why:

As men, its logical to assume that they were straight. Seeing how only less than 5% of the population in the USA consider themselves as "anything but straight", that's not wrong to assume.

That being said, I personally find that, while being less than 5%, the LGBTQIAA+ community happens to make the biggest stink about equal representation. A lot of people nowadays do things that show how "progressive" they are, not because they are sincere about it, but because people eat that stuff up. And that's why I and a lot of other people see releasing a chatacter's sexuality as gay years after most people would assume him to be straight looks like Blizzard is pandering.


Minister R. A. Artis #fundie books.google.com

Jonathan looked at the being that had just said his name was Lucifer, the enemy of mankind. The still vulnerable youngster stood in absolute shock and disbelief. Lucifer observed the young man intently, knowing that his mind was trying desperately to ascertain the gravity of his presence along with what he had just told him. Being the absolute master of conniving deception and charisma, Lucifer set in motion his devious scheme to coerce the boy to his dark light and vision.
Smiling magnanimously, Lucifer placed his hand on Jonathan’s shoulder and, with a quiet compassion, said, “I know this sounds incredible, Jonathan, but everything you hold dear is comprised of half-truths and carefully disguised lies.” Glowing with an ethereal luminance, Lucifer continued, “Let me explain from the beginning…”
“The world from which we abide is called Nahash, located around the star you call Alnilam, the center star in the belt of the constellation Orion. Our world developed our intelligence billions of years before yours, and we achieved a level of development where we evolved into pure energy. Our thoughts could be translated into whatever we could conceive. One of us achieved a power and intelligence greater than all and began to reshape the cosmos into his image. He became so powerful he was able to contract the entire universe into one small infinitesimally dense microscopic singularity and release all that enormous energy in what you call the ‘Big Bang.’ This enabled him to reform the universe as he saw fit. His name is Yahweh, the being you refer to as God.”
Jonathan was rocked to the core of his being as he interrupted Lucifer’s explanation, “Wait one moment! You mean to tell me that Yahweh, though powerful, may not be the God we hold as the Supreme Creator?!”
Smiling at the deductive reasoning and high intelligence the young man showed, Lucifer continued, “That is correct, Jonathan. Yahweh is indeed powerful and to you he may appear to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent, but, in essence he is not God in the sense you perceive God. In the vastness of creation, there are levels of omnipotence that you cannot conceive of in your present stage of development. There are many dimensions of existence in what is called the multiverse which is housed within the omniverse, the conceptual ensemble of all possible universes with all possible laws of physics. Yahweh is only the present manifestation of the Creator Force of this universe. There is, however, a being that is known to those who have attained a certain level of awareness who is the essence and intelligence of the omniverse, and he is referred to as the One Above All.”
“Let me continue, the One Above All decreed that all universes and realities be created, destroyed, and re-created in an eternally repetitive series of cycles for reasons known only to Him. Yahweh decided that instead of being the avatar of the One Above All, he would separate this universe from Himself and create his own cosmos with his own rules. The first thing Yahweh did was to create a pocket dimension he called Heaven, located in the recesses of the Northern quadrant of this universe. He then took the rest of the Nahashians and made them into the hierarchy of angelic beings. I was the first evidence of his creative genius, and he made me the epitome of his splendor, power, and wisdom. I and the rest of the host spent countless eons worshipping Yahweh as matter and time coalesced into its present form.”
“Yahweh then turned his attention to Earth and saw that one of the primitive ape-like creatures had unlimited intelligence and genetic potential. He wanted me to experiment on them. This experimentation took millions of years until I finally created Homo sapiens, who were designed from the very essence of Yahweh. Yahweh was so impressed with my handiwork he imbued man with a fraction of his divine spark that gave man a soul. This surprised and shocked many of the angels, as well as myself, who were confused as to the reason why Yahweh wanted to have created this new race of beings.
“Yahweh gave no reason only that we should be patient and trust him and for a time this was sufficient. However, I discovered that Yahweh intended for man to be a race of slaves, and I did not want this for I had become fond of man. I vehemently criticized Yahweh’s plan, accusing him of lacking vision and benevolence. I decided to collect evidence to persuade Yahweh that humanity deserved to be free to discover their place in the universe and to reach their own potential without the encumbering laws he had created to bind humanity to his oppressive will.
“You see, Jonathan, Yahweh desired all humanity to be his slaves and ignorant to the truth that freedom from his laws bring. I, on the other hand, desired man to have knowledge of self and have his mind opened to realization of that knowledge. Yahweh and I became estranged because of this ideological conflict and so, when in the Garden of Eden, where humanity’s primordial parents, Adam and Eve, the first of Homo sapiens, were told not to eat of the Tree of Knowledge, which was not an actual fruit but a metaphor for forbidden knowledge. Yahweh kept this information hidden from them like in the legend of Prometheus, who stole fire from the gods to give to man. I informed them that their nakedness represented Yahweh’s desire to keep them enslaved because of the threat they represented.
“Yahweh knew that one day man would become as powerful as Himself, and they would become a threat to His reign. Adam and Eve felt degraded by this revelation, and they rebelled against Yahweh who punished them by introducing death, pain, and suffering into the universe to keep them imprisoned to his will. Yahweh then made me the perpetrator of this egregious crime and formulated the legend of Satan and the birth of evil.”
“By this time, the barrier between Yahweh and me had become a full-fledged war, and a third of Heaven had taken up my cause to liberate man. I challenged Yahweh that he was far too removed from man to see how pain and anguish motivated Him to strive for meaning to His mortal existence. I demanded that if He truly wished to understand Himself then He should take human form. Angered by this, Yahweh chose to replicate himself and created Jesus Christ, whom He endowed with all His power. Jesus was fully human at the same time. I challenged Yahweh to experience human passions and desires through Jesus, and this He did by becoming familiar with the mortality of suffering and eventual death. I was awed and shocked by Yahweh’s decision to allow Jesus to die, supposedly as a sacrifice for man’s ‘transgression’ in the Garden of Eden; however, the truth of the matter was— and is— Jesus’ sacrifice was in vain.
“You see, the human spirit is so powerful that at death it resides either in an unconscious state within the body or in an extradimensional limbo. Some await rebirth, while those select few who have lived extraordinary lives are granted oneness with the One Above All, to exist eternally as part of the living spiritual intelligence of the omniverse. Jesus’ sacrifice to atone for sin was another clever ruse to keep humankind enslaved to the will of Yahweh. You see, unlike a regular human, when Jesus, who was Yahweh in human form, died on the cross, He knew that he would survive and thus could never have known the true suffering of man. Man does not know his soul will survive. It suffers, and in this ambiguity, man is granted a gift which Yahweh does not understand: the passion to cling to life and the strength that mortality affords you. Yahweh knew He would survive death and could not truly know what it was to be human.”
Lucifer decided it was time to twist the truth a little more in order to place another shred of doubt in Jonathan’s mind.
Feigning reluctance, Lucifer took a deep breath and vehemently said, “What I am about to divulge to you, Jonathan, is known only to very few. And if Yahweh knew I was telling you this He would most certainly destroy you. Heaven is not what you think. Yahweh created it in an effort to shield his presence from the One Above All and developed the myth that all human souls would subject themselves to his servitude. He formulated that they would abide there with Him after the death of their corporeal forms. The truth is, the only entities present in Heaven are those angelic Nahashians who are in Yahweh’s service, and Hell is another scare tactic He uses to keep his victims enslaved. Heaven and Hell can be on Earth and is how you live your life, Jonathan. You can either live your life a slave to the whims and wishes of a cruel and brutish god, or you can choose to have the blinders lifted from your eyes and see the light of the truth.”
Drawing himself closer to the young man’s beautiful face, Lucifer compassionately said, “Jonathan, Yahweh knows as well as I that humankind has evolved more quickly than anticipated. The latent abilities we foresaw in you will become evident in less than a generation instead of the centuries we thought, and, you my friend, are one of the first of those blessed to become the next stage of human development.
“Homo sapiens are evolving into gods, capable of all manner of wonders and miracles. Your race will transform the universe and I will help you to do so, for this is my desire, to help humans become like me and exist as independent entities, enslaved by no one. I will lead you to your glorious future and together we will topple Yahweh’s destructive and self-serving regime!”
Pleadingly, Lucifer reached out his hand to Jonathan and beseeched him, “Will you help me, Jonathan? Will you take your place at my side and expose Yahweh for what He is?”
Jonathan reeled from the sheer magnitude of all that he had heard and seen as he contemplated everything Lucifer had told him. Was it true that Yahweh was some sort of super alien being and everything he had learned concerning him was a lie designed to keep man from achieving his destiny? Was it Lucifer and not Christ the Messiah who was and Savior of mankind? Was it his destiny to help expose the truth of this to the world?
The young man sighed as he said as if he was weighed down by the entire world’s problems compounded doubly, “This is all so fantastic. I don’t know what to think, or do. I have to consider what to do with all that you have told me.”
Smiling graciously, Lucifer said, “I understand Jonathan. I realize I have placed a tremendous burden on you, but remember, fate rarely calls upon us at a time of our choosing, yet when it does, will you be ready? I will not force you Jonathan. You will have to decide for yourself what to do with what I have told you. Truth is a dangerous thing my friend, for once you have learned from it, you can never go back to who you were. Stay blind and in darkness and remain a slave, or take what I given you and free the world.”
Lucifer slowly disappeared and said in passing, “When the time comes, I shall return unto you and it will be then you will chose either to stand with me or against me. Farewell, until then …”
The sound of Lucifer’s voice echoed into the night sky as he vanished from sight and left Jonathan alone on the shores of Loch Ness.
The Scotland summer wind wafted over the waters of the famous lake and drifted over Jonathan, caressing his body with its warm light touch, as he tried desperately to make sense of what had just transpired. His entire world had been turned upside down and the teachings he had once held dear may all be a part of a carefully conceived lie invented by an immensely powerful alien who wished to maintain a dictatorial hold on humankind in order to prevent them from evolving into a super race that had the potential to bring his tyrannical rule to an end and restore the universe to the care of the One Above All, if everything Lucifer had told him was true. In his mind, Jonathan thought that this was all some form of hallucination, but if it was, then what caused it? He knew in his rational mind that this was indeed a true and real occurrence, but to what purpose? He was well aware that his gifts and talents made him stand apart, but was he so exceptional that he merited the attention of not only God, but that of Lucifer as well? Was Lucifer truly the evil entity he was portrayed to be, or was he indeed the being who truly created humans and the true Savior of mankind? Was he the benefactor of human civilization and not the perpetrator of malevolence and wickedness history showed him to be? These questions and many, many more raced through his mind as he looked over the waters of Loch Ness. The words which Lucifer spoke to him were the most compelling declarations he had ever heard and they carried a ring of truth, but, like strong black coffee, there was a bitterness that hung over him. Had Lucifer told him the truth or was he being the consummate liar he was said to be and was this an attempt to have him become a disciple of iniquity?
Falling to his knees, Jonathan cried out in a loud voice, “God, help me! What am I going to do?! I can’t handle this! It is too much for me to bear!”
The tears that flowed from his eyes dripped down his face and rained upon the ground as he wept in confusion and pain. All of a sudden, the waters of Loch Ness began to churn and great waves were thrown ferociously against the shores and broke Jonathan from his cries to God. The agitation grew more intense as the young man looked in confusion and wonder at what was occurring in front of him. What more could happen to him this night? Suddenly a great serpentine form exploded from the frothing disorder of the waters and released a deafening roar that chilled Jonathan to the very core of his being. Fearfully, Jonathan wondered if this was the famed Loch Ness Monster of legend.

Harmonica #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "Notes on the Third Reconstruction"]

Previously, I took the view that there were three periods of Reconstruction on the South. The First Reconstruction began in 1865 at Appomattox and ended in 1877 with the withdrawal of the last Reconstruction soldiers from Dixie. The Second Reconstruction began in 1954 with Brown v Board of Education and ended in 1972 when George Wallace forced Richard Nixon to embrace an anti-busing position, something I previously outlined here. The Third Reconstruction began in 2015 with the Charleston Church shooting and is going on to this day, having picked up considerable steam in the past few months. However, the more I study, the more I am convinced that there are actually four Reconstruction periods. The first two Reconstructions remain unchanged, but I now realize that there was a Third Reconstruction during the 1990s, beginning in 1991 and ending in 2001. What I previously considered the Third Reconstruction is actually the Fourth Reconstruction (our present situation).

The true Third Reconstruction began in 1991, one of the most important years in human history. It is this year that the Soviet Union fell and Marxists had to abandon their economic focus and shift fully to the Culture War – embracing anti-racism (anti-Western civilization), feminism (anti-masculinity) and the alphabet soup identities (anti-procreation). It was also that year that, with the fall of the Soviet Union, globalism was left unchallenged . In the U.S., 1991 would also see the emergence of the Clinton takeover of the Democratic Party, completing the transformation of what was the pro-worker, pro-Dixie, virtually Christian Democratic Party of my grandfather to a party that was willing to sell out workers for free trade and celebrate infanticide. And, more directly related to Dixie, it was this same year the NAACP issued a proclamation condemning the use of the Confederate flag.

Part of the reason I didn’t think the 1990s constituted the Third Reconstruction was how idyllic that time period appeared to be when I was growing up. It was a world where the Old South still lived, Confederate flags were commonplace, and we still had men like M.E. Bradford with us. “Unreconstructed” was a compliment in those days. But, as I have studied the era with clearer eyes, I realize things were not as rosy as they appeared to be. It was a decade of several significant terrorist attacks, a ton of racial tension, and horrific school shootings just to name a few. It was also a time when the Republican Party began to win elections, outside the presidency, with some consistency in Dixie. While a surface level critique would suggest that this was simply the result of the national Democratic Party moving leftward and that Dixie just replaced conservative Democrats with conservative Republicans, the truth is much more complicated as there was a distinct difference between the conservative Democrats of Dixie’s past and the conservative Republicans of the 1990s onward. The former was a conservatism of a particular people and their preservation, the latter was a conservatism of corporate profits and military spending.

It was during the 1990s that these newly elected Republicans began to dole out the incentives to come to Dixie, under the auspices of “creating jobs” and being “pro-business.” It worked for a while, but with this job growth came new people that did not share our values. Until the 1980s, virtually the entire native population of Dixie could claim membership in the Sons of Confederate Veterans or the United Daughters of the Confederacy, now we’re being pushed out by newcomers to such a point that we joke if Atlanta is even still in the South, and how in Florida the farther south you go, the further “north” you get.

[...]

Now I see that what occurred in the 1990s helped create the political climate of today and what victories we did gain was merely an illusion. We lost because we allowed the subtle subversion of our culture to take place, the fruits of which are being felt today. I liken what happened during the 1990s to AIDS. When the body is first infected with the HIV virus, the person will have flu like symptoms for two weeks before they recover. That’s when the virus is working its way into the body. Years later, the problems really start as the immune system has been ravished. And, such is the case with Dixie (along with the rest of America). The battles we were fighting were small potatoes compared to what had gone on before, but it was even more destructive in many ways as it destroyed the long-term ability for Dixie to push back.

When future historians write about how efficient the Fourth Reconstruction was, I think the events of the 1990s will be seen as particularly important. Yes, I know the history of the Fourth Reconstruction has yet to be completed, but it isn’t looking good and that they were able to push things this far is remarkable and frankly frightening. It would have been unthinkable at any point in the past and it didn’t come out of the blue, it was simply the 1990s baring fruit. It was the era when we were promised that in exchange for assimilation, we could become wealthy. Far too many of our people took it, especially the politically well-connected. Due to the problems of that decade, Dixie was unable to produce a new generation of leadership to guide her during tough times, and boy are these ever tough times. The 1990s may have looked great at the time, but good times don’t forge strong men – were living through that now. The good news is that tough times do forge strong men.

Keep the faith. We’re not dead yet.

Ian4j #fundie charismanews.com

There are many folks 'out there' quick to dispense the story about that man trying to shoot John Hagee and also the Blood Red Moons. Well both have happened. Eventually some folk have confirmed seeing the gunman and others hearing audio tapes.

With reference to the Blood Red Moons, well they have happened and I was able to directly see the final one from my home have risen during the night to see it.

That leaves us with the interpretation of the period in which the cycle of the tetrads occurred and their presence in the sky occurring coincident with the Jewish feast days. I do not recall Jonathan Cahn making specific statements about what would happen. However the previous seven cycles have had significant events associated with them. This cycle has been no different!!!! During the last year [which just happens to have been a shimitah year!!!] there have been significant financial failures - which the media JUST seem to have ignored what a surprise.
Not only that but surely you 'out there' have been watching and seeing the significant awful events in the Middle East and across the world? The disastrous events for the displaced people, the tragedies for those fleeing the ISIS violence? Russian activity in Syria? The energy discovery in the Golan heights? The UN treatment of Israel and many many more.

Come now the period of the Blood Red moons NOT significant? If your Christian look up for your redemption is NIGH. BUT woe-betide you Christian if you are not actively sharing the good news for God does not want any to perish!!!!!

After the Rapture #fundie disappearances.info

[Directly After the Rapture]
This has got to be the most challenging event ever to face those charged with maintaining order in our society. The 24 hour missing person rule is the only reprieve anyone will get. Many roadways will be littered with accidents caused by out-of-control vehicles... vehicles without a driver. Young passengers are missing. Stranger still is the common thread of the missing drivers: a cross hanging from the mirror, a Bible in the car, a fish emblem on the back of the vehicle, and maybe even that silly bumper sticker that proclaims the warning "In case of the Rapture this vehicle will be un-manned". There just may be more truth in that statement than previously considered. Seat belts fastened with clothing arrayed as if the person just vaporized. For indeed, that is exactly what has happened.

Forensic experts would do well to examine closely the fibers of clothing in direct contact with skin, as they will likely exhibit evidence of exposure to extreme high-level electromagnetic radiation. The same principal that raised Christ from the dead in A.D. 30 is at work here in the event of the Rapture

hayden #fundie bbs.payableondeath.com

It's not hard to figure out. Even I know from experience. I went through a phase in my teens where I watched porn for awhile, and I started to do things that I never would have done until I saw pornagraphy...It just begins to justify things in the mind that weren't previously considered ok.

ColdLightOfDay #sexist #wingnut incels.co

Why IT are incapable of acknowledging racial inequality in the dating scene when they purport to have a dedication to social justice

If the racial inequality faced by ethnics in the dating scene was present in any other sphere of life; be it economic, legal or even something trivial like Hollywood representation, those at IT and other left leaning areas of discussion would have absolutely no problem in identifying and condemning it, yet they are resoundingly resistant to any evidence that supports the theory that inceldom can be caused by any biological or ‘hardware’ factors.

They maintain that the primary reason a man will struggle to find a relationship is rooted in his deportment, attitude or behaviour. In other terms, his ‘software’ factors.

(I myself am economically a traditional leftist, though I find much of the ‘new left’ to have lost it’s mind) I have come to realise why so many areas of the nominal ‘left’ cannot come to terms with the fact that ethnics suffer extreme discrimination in the dating world and it is down to the dualism of competing virtues.

The left wants to protect those it has identified as ‘victim groups,’ this is ostensibly a noble and virtuous cause to commit oneself to. The problem arises when the cause of inequality for one victim group stems from the attitudes or behaviour of another victim group. This sort-circuits the ability of the left to identify a perpetrator to blame for the victimisation of those within a victim group, and so they just end up ignoring the inequality all together as there is no ‘big bad’ to pin the blame on. They will do anything they can not to pin blame on a victim group, because they fear victimising them further, but this happens even if that group’s actions are victimising another group.

I notice this phenomena is very relevant in the UK right now, where grooming gangs of predominantly Pakistani men have been victimising young girls and the left have no idea how to respond. They can’t blame the attitudes of Pakistanis because they are a victim group themselves who have faced much oppression in the UK, so there is nowhere to inconsequentially impart blame, there has been a nationwide explosion of cases like this and many coverups because no one wants to discuss it for fear of further victimising Pakistanis.

The reason IT cannot admit that there is a bias against ethnic men in female sexual selection patterns is because females (of all races) are perceived to be a victim group in of themselves, so the fact that ethnic men are victim to these biases becomes obscured.

I openly admit that there are aspects of male psychology that are very unpleasant and cause major problems in society. Men have a greater propensity for violence, are more susceptible to anger and are more likely to commit crimes of most kinds because of a higher level of testosterone that pushes us take more risks.

IT and other left-leaning circles will openly embrace this because men are not deemed to be a victim group, so their psychology can be effectively scrutinised without fear that one is further victimising a victim group.

But there are unsavoury aspects to female psychology as well, and this includes an increased propensity for racial selectivity in sexual attraction. IT will never be able to recognise this due to a fear of victimising the already perceived victim group of women and so this unpleasant feature of their psychology will continuously be swept under the rug.

The most frustrating thing about this is that I don’t even blame women for this unavoidable feature of their psychological composition, it is unchosen and not a matter of volition, much like how no man would choose to be more beholden to fits of inordinate anger. I just wish it could be recognised as unpleasant in the same way it is not remotely taboo to point out that male psychology has unpleasant aspects to it as well.

TLDR: the reason IT can’t accept that ethnic men are inadvertent victims of a sexual selection process that inadvertently excludes them is because women are viewed as a victim group themselves and they are incapable of criticising a group they consider to already be victimised.

Cretus clawfinger #fundie reddit.com

I have American centered myopia, but I can grudgingly admit, that in the face of their persecution and impending genocide, non-democratic racist apartheid was far preferable for the Afrikaners. Abandoning it really was a naive betrayal of their own people. At the level of existential conflict, the only morality that matters is your own survival and loyalty to the tribe. The Afrikaners have been there as long as whites have been in the United States. Under the same rubric we should be forced to give up all our belongings and property to Native Americans or blacks. I'd much rather kill or die than do that, whatever moral argument you could come up with, legit or not.
It's humiliating, but in many ways, I'm sure the Africans were better off economically under apartheid, and without European colonialism they would still be small scale agriculturalists or hunter-gatherers. I might differ in that I don't think there's anything wrong with that, but I'm not sure modern South Africans are willing to pick up the spear again, and they're obviously in many ways dependent on whites to maintain the infrastructure of modernity.
Perhaps the ultimate lesson is, it's a bad idea in the long term to place yourself as a domineering minority where you will have to exploit an alien majority to enrich yourself and maintain order...especially across racial lines...eventually there will be some kind of uprising. And if you must, there's no sense in being half-way evil, "humane" oppression will still be unforgiven.
Any prospect for a breakaway, self sufficient Afrikaner secession, like a large scale Orania, even if it means ceding massive land tracks? Without that, looks like they're shit out of luck.

Cretus clawfinger #racist reddit.com

I have American centered myopia, but I can grudgingly admit, that in the face of their persecution and impending genocide, non-democratic racist apartheid was far preferable for the Afrikaners. Abandoning it really was a naive betrayal of their own people. At the level of existential conflict, the only morality that matters is your own survival and loyalty to the tribe. The Afrikaners have been there as long as whites have been in the United States. Under the same rubric we should be forced to give up all our belongings and property to Native Americans or blacks. I'd much rather kill or die than do that, whatever moral argument you could come up with, legit or not.
It's humiliating, but in many ways, I'm sure the Africans were better off economically under apartheid, and without European colonialism they would still be small scale agriculturalists or hunter-gatherers. I might differ in that I don't think there's anything wrong with that, but I'm not sure modern South Africans are willing to pick up the spear again, and they're obviously in many ways dependent on whites to maintain the infrastructure of modernity.
Perhaps the ultimate lesson is, it's a bad idea in the long term to place yourself as a domineering minority where you will have to exploit an alien majority to enrich yourself and maintain order...especially across racial lines...eventually there will be some kind of uprising. And if you must, there's no sense in being half-way evil, "humane" oppression will still be unforgiven.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy truthernews.wordpress.com

In March of 2015, Swiss citizens began to notice a bright new star in Switzerland’s western sky. Vividly brighter than Venus which flanked it, the apparently man-made star has never been reported on—until now.

Located approximately 100 miles above the Earth in Lower Earth Orbit (LEO), the man-made star was temporarily positioned above CERN whcih is located just outside of Geneva, Switzerland, the de facto capitol of the underworld.

Geneva, which was previously home to the League of Nations, is currently home to the International Red Cross, the United Nations, and the Central Intelligence Agency, otherwise known as the CIA. Consequently, the former location of what is now being called the ‘CIA Death Star’ is highly suspicious.

Interestingly, the geometry of CERN mimics that of the Death Star from Star Wars exactly. This is no coincidence for the Swiss CIA has been responsible for executing virtually all of the assassinations, terror attacks and wars witnessed in the underworld over the last 715 years.

Exactly what the CIA Death Star is or how it got there is not yet known, but it’s arrival just happened to coincide with the cover of the Swiss CIA being blown for the first time in history on March 31, 2015, as depicted in the Truther.org report entitled “10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA”.

Although only conjecture, it appears that the sole power of planet Earth (i.e., the Roman Empire in Greenland) decided to elevate the command part of its CIA Headquarters to the CIA Death Star above CERN in order to prevent CIA minions on the ground from discovering that they’re actually not in charge.

In other words, the CIA in Switzerland runs the underworld at the behest of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland. Consequently, once the operational cover of the CIA was blown for the first time in history, the headquarters of the CIA were subsequently moved to the CIA Death Star, out of harm’s way.

Whether or not the International Space Station (ISS) is the operational cover for the CIA Death Star is not yet known, but the term “ISS” and “Suisse” are consonantly speaking the same. Therefore, the term ISS may in fact be code word for the CIA Death Star.

Whether or not Greco-Romans are now traveling back and forth from Greenland to Switzerland via the CIA Death Star is also not known, but the timing of the star’s appearance in March of 2015 and its subsequent disappearance around July 15, 2015, is highly suspect to say the least.

In all likelihood, the CIA Death Star has either: a) returned to Greenland or another remote location where it remains hidden from the prying eyes of underworld, or b) landed somewhere within the CERN complex where it’s being hidden underground, an unlikely notion considering its massive size.

NASA’s Death Star Coverup
Because the Swiss CIA is spying on me and actively monitoring my computers and cell phone, they knew that I was going to publish a report on the CIA Death Star. In order to preempt this, NASA published a propaganda report on June 11, 2015, stating that the CIA Death Star was a naturally occurring phenomenon. According to NASA, the CIA Death Star was just Jupiter or Venus coming close together, a phenomenon which reportedly won’t happen again until 2023. The fist problem with NASA’s bogus report is that they state that the phenomenon was only relegated to June of 2015. This is completely contradictory to scores of eyewitness reports which state that the CIA Death Star has been in the night sky since March of 2015. I first witnessed the CIA Death Star in May of 2015 and monitored it almost daily until it disappeared on or around July 15, 2015. I was waiting to publish this report until I was able to travel to CERN personally, but I never had the chance. The second problem with NASA’s bogus report is that there is currently no star as bright as the CIA Death Star in the night sky. In other words, when Jupiter and Venus are located in the night sky, their brightness fails in comparison to that of the CIA Death Star as depicted in numerous photos and videos. The third problem with NASA’s bogus report is that there is no star as large as the CIA Death Star in the night sky. In other words, when the largest stars are located in the night sky, their sheer size fails in comparison to that of the CIA Death Star as depicted in numerous photos and videos. The fourth problem with NASA’s bogus report is that there are no photos or videos corroborating Jupiter’s and Venus’ alleged conjunction. In other words, there is no evidence which depicts the gradual conjunction of the two planetary bodies; they are only witnessed at the same relative distance to other as depicted in the photos and videos. In order to further muddy the waters in respect to the CIA Death Star, Russia Today published a report on July 1, 2015, entitled “Thousands Catch Jupiter, Venus Forming Super Bright ‘Star of Bethlehem’”. The name “Star of Bethlehem” was designed to add a Biblical connotation to the CIA Death Star, further selling the notion that it was a naturally occurring phenomenon.

CERN = CIA Headquarters
Because CERN is allegedly the largest nuclear and particle physics laboratory in the world, security at the facility is likely the highest on Earth. Consequently, it’s the perfect place to house the Central Intelligence Agency, hide the CIA Death Star, and launch intercontinental space-based flights to and from Greenland. Since CERN is admittedly the birthplace and home of the World Wide Web, it wields almost absolute power over Earth, most of which is now run by supercomputers. Since virtually all banking, commerce, communication and travel are now controlled digitally, whomever has power over said supercomputers essentially rules the world. The notion that CERN is cover for CIA Headquarters is corroborated by the fact that as of 2013, CERN had 2,513 staff members and 12,313 fellows, associates and apprentices, most of which are likely CIA employees. Since it’s highly unlikely that nearly 15,000 people commute to CERN on a daily basis, the complex is a likely a massive all-inclusive military-grade bunker built deep underground. Using the modern Roman-English alphabet, the term “CERN” is consonantly speaking the same as “CROWN” (the letter “W” is often benign) for it represents the true seat of power in the underworld. When employing the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet), the term “CERN” consonantly speaking equates to “CRX” which translates to “Crux”, the Latin word for “Cross”. Coincidentally, the flag of Switzerland bears a Greek Cross that equates to the letter “D”, an acronym for “Die” and “Death”.

CERN = 666
As evidenced, the logo of CERN contains the number “666” which is indicative of “The Beast”, a Biblical euphemism for the Devil or Anti-Christ. When employing the rudimentary methods of algebra used in Jewish Gematria, the absolute value of “666” equates to “18” (i.e., 6+6+6 = 18) whose digital root is “9” (i.e.,1+8 = 9). In the Roman-English alphabet, the 18th letter is “R” while in Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet) the 9th symbol is “G” (i.e., the original letter “R”). Since the letter “R” and the symbol “G” are both acronyms for “Rome”, it can be deduced that the number “666” equates to the Roman Empire. Because the Roman Empire is now located in Greenland, it runs the underworld via Switzerland which is coincidentally home to the CIA. Since CIA Headquarters are evidently located in CERN, its logo contains the number 666.

Shiva Statue at CERN
Shiva or Siva is considered the Supreme God within Shaivism who is the creator and destroyer of all that is. Coincidentally, back on June 18, 2004, a 2-meter tall statue of Shiva was unveiled at CERN in Switzerland. Shiva’s sacred number is “5” which equates to the “?” symbol (i.e., “Chi”) in the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet) which is indicative of the country of Switzerland. Shiva if often depicted with 10 arms which is symbolic of the geographic shape of Switzerland which appears to have 10 arms or legs. Tripurantaka, a manifestation of Shiva, is depicted with four arms wielding a bow and arrow. He holds an axe and a deer on the upper pair of his arms, and a bow and an arrow lower pair of the arms, respectively. Tripurantaka is symbolic of the four-armed cross of Switzerland which is responsible for executing assassinations, terror attacks and wars in the underworld at the behest of the Roman Empire in Greenland. Shiva also rides on a bull, his vehicle, which is representative of Babylon, the former capitol of the Roman Empire. Coincidentally, Switzerland is responsible for managing and maintaining the Babylon System in the underworld. The English term “sieve” (S+V), which is consonantly speaking the same as “Siva”, is a device that is used to separate wanted elements from unwanted material. Metaphorically speaking, Switzerland is the sieve of the underworld for it removes unwanted people and ideas, especially in respect to the secret home of the CIA and the fact that the Roman Empire is alive and well in Greenland.

Daniel Silva #fundie quora.com

I’ve never been to a country outside of America, yet I continue to believe other countries exist.

Why? Because people who have experiences in those countries have come back and told the detailed stories of their experiences. They tell what they’ve seen and heard, how the people behave, etc. They bring back souvenirs, pictures, etc. (otherwise known as evidence.)

But if I, having no experience in another country, were to tell those people, “No other countries besides America exist!” what do you think they would say?

“You’re crazy! We’ve been there. We’ve seen the evidence!”

If I say, again, from my lack of experience in those countries, “there’s no evidence! It’s all a fairy tale myth!” I might be able to say it in a way that sounds intellectual, but I’m still trying to convince people with an experience that my lack of experience is a more reliable piece of evidence.

It’s silly.

So what is the only way I’ll believe if I don’t accept the stories and souvenirs people bring back as good enough evidence?

I’ll have to go to one of those other countries and see for myself.

When it comes down to it, regarding why I believe, no argument, no matter how convincing, will satisfy the need some people have to see for themselves. Even if I bring back tangible evidence, people will yell “Trickery! You made that in your basement!”

My friends and I used to travel towns and pray for the sick. We would see a lot of miracles happen: Broken bones being instantly put back together, people getting out of wheelchairs, deaf ears opening, migraines disappearing, etc. All the same evidence Jesus brought from his country.

Still, no matter how much the evidence, no matter how many verified doctor reports there were, no matter how many videos we published, there were a ton of people (including Christians) screaming, “Trickery! You’ve falsified those claims!”

Why? Because they lack the experience.

I believe because I’ve seen the other country. I’ve tasted the food. I’ve participated in the recreational activities.

I’ve seen so much evidence that even when I don’t want to believe that other country exists, I can’t stop because my life has been full of the evidence.

I believe because I’ve seen plenty of evidence (too much, if you consider my previous statement). If it’s not good enough evidence for others, that’s their deal. It doesn’t cancel what I’ve seen, heard, tasted and touched.

John Derbyshire #racist vdare.com

Part Two of my answer: Jews are white, Asians are not, and while any overclass is resented, a racially distinctive overclass is resented more than one that barely looks any different from the resenters.

Anti-Semites know this; that's why they put out drawings of the hunch-backed, hook-nosed cartoon Jew when they want to inflame anti-Jewish feeling. It makes the Jew plainly a different race.

Part Three of my answer: even under the current covert quotas, Asian Americans are enrolled at elite colleges in numbers far above their five percent share of the U.S. population.

Yes, they're being held down: on a strictly meritocratic basis their numbers would be much higher yet, because of the arithmetic of those distribution tails. Still, strictly measured by demographic proportionality, they're high.
So yes, we were importing an overclass a hundred years ago. Elite universities dealt with the issue by fudging and chicanery—just as they are dealing with this repeat performance.

There are some key differences, though. Jews are white, which makes things easier to fudge.

Also, the high IQ of Ashkenazi Jews is more verbal than visuo-spatial, leading to that dominance in the shaping of opinion.
Asian Americans, by contrast, are much more visible as a group. And their high IQ is more visuo-spatial than verbal, giving us more engineers and scientists, fewer writers, lawyers, comedians, movie and newspaper moguls.

But in both cases, non-Asian gentiles get squeezed. We un-squeeze blacks and Hispanics with Affirmative Action, but that just squeezes white gentiles even more.
Under our current state ideology, the orthodox approach to that hovers somewhere between "Who cares?" and "Serve them right!"

Whether that ideology can be sustained going forward through the 21st century, is an interesting question.

Second point main point raised by readers: any merit-based immigration system imports an overclass.

I agree. Consider for example India. The mean IQ of that country is 82. The mean IQ of Indians in the U.S.A., on the other hand, is 106—higher than the mean for white gentile Americans.

So there's an overclass we've imported … from a low-IQ population.

The same applies to Africa. The mean IQ in black Africa is 70, which is very low. Assuming a normal distribution with mean 70 and standard deviation 15, Microsoft Excel tells me that only 0.0032 percent of the population is higher than 130 IQ.

That's a teeny-tiny percent; but there are an awful lot of black Africans: 1.2 billion is the latest number I've seen. Point zero zero three two percent of 1.2 billion is 38,000. Every one of those 38,000 very-smart Africans is applying for a U.S. student visa.
Caribbean blacks are, for complicated reasons, somewhat smarter than black Africans. Add them into the mix and we're importing a small black overclass.
Is this something we should be bothered about? We-e-ell … there are contrary factors to consider.

Under the present regime of chain migration, for example, all those smart Indians and Africans can bring in their way-less-smart siblings, brides, parents, and even cousins. You could argue that long-term that evens out the mix.

There's also regression to the mean. The offspring of these high-IQ immigrants will regress towards their population mean — although not all the way to it, or else Natural Selection wouldn't work. Given the likelihood of assortative mating, in fact — smart immigrants marrying other smart people — regression all the way back to the population mean is highly improbable, even after many generations.

So, no, this is not a great issue. It is an issue, though — an issue that lurks behind all the happy talk about a merit-based system of immigration.

The first time America imported an overclass, we did so accidentally. When that Great Wave of Ashkenazi Jews came in after 1881, we had only the vaguest ideas about population differentials in intelligence and personality. Psychometry as a quantitative science was just getting started.

Now we understand much more, and can make better decisions. If we import a new overclass today, we'll be doing it deliberately. We know enough to not do it.

And any overclass we import now will be nonwhite. That follows just from the balance of races in the world being much different than it was 100 years ago.

If you're a nonwhite who doesn't like white people, you are fine with that. If you're a white person living in one of the globalist-bubble districts — big coastal cities, college towns — you may think it's no big deal, we can all get along.

The rest of us are shaking our heads.

The Meme Policeman #elitist facebook.com

Many have highlighted the Ayn Rand Institute (and other similar groups) taking PPP funds as hypocrisy. Their thought process goes; Rand opposed welfare, they are getting government assistance, thus hypocrisy. This is a shallow and mistaken view of her philosophy and the reasoning behind taking these funds.
-The ARI didn’t secretly apply for PPP loans, hoping no one would notice. They wrote an article back in May proudly announcing the move, “we *will* take any relief money offered us. We will take it unapologetically, because the principle here is: justice.” So how could taking government money be justice?
-Ayn Rand herself explained in a 1966 essay. She explained the recipient in such a case is morally justified “so long as he regards it as restitution and opposes all forms of welfare-statism.” Those who support such handouts, “have no right to them; those who oppose them have. If this sounds like a paradox, the fault lies in the moral contradictions of welfare statism, not in its victims.”
-Rand recognized that the welfare state (the taking of some people’s money by force to give to another) was wrong. To advocate for or support this was also wrong, but what about those who oppose redistribution but are still stuck in the system? “The victims do not have to add self-inflicted martyrdom to the injury done to them by others; they do not have to let the looters profit doubly, by letting them distribute the money exclusively to the parasites who clamored for it. Whenever the welfare-state laws offer them some small restitution, the victims should take it.”
-Similarly, if someone advocates for private roads, but given the current system there’s only government roads, they are not obligated to refuse to use all roads, that would be absurd. To get taxed for the road and not use it out of some sense of principle would make one unnecessarily suffer. And for what? The same holds for programs like Social Security, Medicare and certain government scholarships and grants.
-As for the PPP funds, the government shut down most of the economy, adversely affecting virtually everyone (including ARI and their donors). They then offered money to virtually everyone to ease the pain. But the government has no money of its own, so essentially it is taking from all to give to all. Money that will likely not be paid for through taxation, but through inflation and deficits, which will effectively take from all productive people in the future. To refuse some of this restitution, so that others who might be indifferent or wholeheartedly support government redistribution can solely benefit, is not standing on principle, but enduring yet another sacrifice.
-Rand lists some other factors to consider in accepting money. One must not compromise their values or views and continue to advocate against the welfare state (the ARI was clear in their article that they would continue to fight for laissez-faire and their efforts wouldn’t be affected). And they shouldn’t take part in providing moral or ideological support for such programs, nor help in enforcing immoral laws.
-Rand admits these are often difficult moral questions. “It is a hard problem, and there are many situations so ambiguous and so complex that no one can determine what is the right course of action. That is one of the evils of welfare statism: its fundamental irrationality and immorality forces men into contradictions where no course of action is right.”
-One major drawback to these stimulus programs is it forces almost everyone into these moral quandaries. Essentially, it’s a free-for-all for government money, should you take yours or simply let everyone else benefit at your expense? There’s no purely virtuous move, but the fault of that lies with the stimulus programs themselves.
-She concludes with this caution in accepting government money, “The ultimate danger in all of these issues is psychological: the danger of letting yourself get bribed, the danger of a gradual, imperceptible, subconscious deterioration leading to compromise, evasion, resignation, submission. In today’s circumstances, a man is morally in the clear only so long as he remains intellectual incorruptible. Ultimately, these problems are a test, a hard test, of your own integrity.”

holocaust21 #sexist holocaust21.wordpress.com

A feminist student who wished to become a police officer (presumably so she could wrongly jail hundreds or thousands of men on allegations of rape and child molestation) has thankfully been jailed before her career had even begun. She was found guilty of falsely accusing a taxi driver of rape and jailed for 16 months (unfortunately a light sentence considering the magnitude of her crime).

It’s unfortunate that her mindset clearly illustrates the kind of people who join our police force. No wonder the police are so rotten, though on this rare occasion it seems they did the correct thing. Hopefully it will serve as a deterrent to others.

Graham Seibert #racist #sexist #homophobia #wingnut amren.com

Marry Your Own Kind

We can marry whomever we want. Anti-miscegenation laws are gone, and social norms have been relaxed. “Empowered” women, sexual liberation, and lesbianism mean there are fewer white women available or desirable as wives. White men are looking elsewhere, especially to Asian women.

There is a bitter backlash from white women who resent this, but nobody wants to marry a bitter woman. The “manosphere” is full of complaints about white women, so why should a white man marry one? I was married for eight years to an Asian and for 25 years to a half Asian (three children), and am now ten years into a successful marriage (two kids) with a white woman. Marrying your own kind — after choosing carefully — makes the most sense.

I have read widely on evolution. Survival of the fittest means differentiation and competition. The strategies that work best win out.

Sarah Blaffer Hrdy writes that human reproductive strategy was simply better than that of our ape ancestors. Nonreproducing females — sisters, aunts, grandmothers — help raise children. Human males do the same, at least more so than male apes. Human mothers can therefore bear children every two years or so as opposed to every five or six for apes. We out-bred apes, and with homo sapiens’ unique ability to speak and cooperate, other ape-men as well.

Real diversity

In Race, Evolution and Behavior Philippe Rushton applied r/K strategy to races. We evolved different reproductive strategies because we occupy different niches. Northeast Asians — fighting a harsh but predictable climate — became the most K selected. Africans, in a benign but unpredictable environment because of disease and predators, remained the most r selected.

Families reflect these differences. Asian “tiger moms” invest a great deal of effort in each child. Every member of a multigenerational Asian family recognizes that he must work towards bringing up the next generation. More than other people, Asians fulfill their roles out of a sense of duty. One of the attractions of an Asian wife is that sense of duty. Asian wives tend to feel obligated to feed their husbands, whether they like them or not, and to take care of children.

On the other hand, libido is weaker among the K-selected Asians. The newspapers carry stories of young Japanese and Chinese of both sexes who have no interest in sex. They are more likely to be faithful, but perhaps less likely to be satisfying partners. These are population averages; there is far more variation within a race than between the races.

Africans on average have measurably higher levels of sex hormones, mature earlier, and tend to have higher sex drives compared to Asians, but they don’t feel the Asian sense of obligation to spouses and children.

Caucasians are in between, although a bit more toward the Asian end of the scale. Stanford’s Luigi Cavalli Sforza has devised a scheme of measuring the genetic distance between any two populations. The genetic distances between the major races are much greater than those between any two European nations. Since our temperaments are under considerable genetic control, we are more likely to understand a fellow European at a deep level. That has certainly been my experience.

True love

Some things do not fall on the r/K continuum. We white folks came to believe in love and romance.

James Q. Wilson, writing in The Marriage Problem, attributed the notion of marrying for love to the medieval English practice of a young man moving out of the parental house to start his own homestead. When he was established and could afford it, he went out on his own to seek a wife among the local girls. He would choose on the basis of personal attraction, without much input from parents or anybody else.

Kevin MacDonald, writing in Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition, pushes the practice back further. He links it to the individualism of the hunter gatherers of preagricultural Europe. Each individual rose on his own merits in the “Männerbund,” or brotherhood of men. These were egalitarian societies in which individual merit mattered more than family.

Dr. MacDonald proposes that monogamy was the standard in these societies. Individuals living close to nature don’t have enough resources to support multiple wives, and sexual rivalries would have destroyed the cohesion of the Männerbund. Both parties chose carefully because they were marrying for life. They wanted someone who was skillful at manly or womanly tasks, but also pleasant to be with. The Catholic Church, a uniquely Western institution, promoted monogamous marriage as a sacred bond, based on love, dedicated to raising children — Augustine’s fides, proles et sacramentum.

That sets Europe in contrast to the rest of the world. In richer societies elsewhere, families chose mates for their offspring to keep wealth within the family. They arranged marriages for the competitive advantage of the tribe. In some places, such as among the Indians of the Brazilian rain forest, chiefs simply assigned marriage partners. All members of a tribe were so closely related by blood that it didn’t make much difference genetically.

The upshot is that romantic love is a Western notion, and we white people evolved the mental equipment to make it work. We believe in love. While the Japanese have made a fetish out of sending Valentine’s Day cards, and the Africans certainly celebrate sex, we lead in our belief in love. Moreover, Western societies were unique in the status afforded to women. We evolved to treat them as true partners, not just status symbols or incubators of our children.

Belief in love is not an unmixed blessing. Westerners are uniquely disappointed when we don’t find it. An Asian man will remain with the wife of his youth and simply take concubines if he can afford them. Sex in African societies is unconstrained. Native Americans likewise consider fidelity to the tribe to be more important than fidelity to their partner.

We Westerners have put ourselves in a bind. Western women have grown to expect that they can have it all: a family and the true love that society celebrates and that their ancestors knew, along with freedom and a career. Sometimes it all fits, often not.

Before the 1950s, sex was seen as part of marriage, not an end in itself. People were expected to fulfill their obligations to each other in the marriage, especially with regard to earning money, keeping house, raising children, and paying bills. Satisfaction came from fulfilling obligations to family and society, not sex.

Hugh Hefner started Playboy magazine in 1953, and in the same decade, Simone de Beauvoir published The Second Sex. The 1960s saw Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique, along with the pill, the sexual revolution, the antiwar counterculture, and drugs. The emphasis turned to self-gratification, with sex becoming a plaything more than an instrument of procreation as part of a larger, social commitment. Sex became burdened with expectations it could never fulfill, leading to generations of unfulfilled men and women. This is how we arrived at today’s situation.

Children

The children of a mixed marriage are . . . mixed. My one-fourth Japanese children called themselves “mixers” — neither Asian nor white. However, when pressed, because being white is so monumentally out-of-favor, they lean toward their Japanese quarter.

If the genetic distance between the parents is great enough, the parents will be genetically closer to members of their own race than to their own children — hard as that may be to believe.

I had hoped my children would inherit their mother’s Asian work ethic and conscientiousness and my drive and curiosity. I was disappointed. Is this common? Anecdotally, I do not see as many successful mixed-race Asian Americans as one would expect.

Only one of my mixed-race children inherited the sense of romantic love I got from my parents. She is also inclined to be critical of men who don’t have an Asian level of conscientiousness. I believe that she and, indeed, all three of them would be more comfortable if they were not mixed.

There is unlikely to be a statistical study of the characteristics of Asian-Caucasian “mixers.” It is hard to imagine a more politically charged research thesis. Moreover, a rigorous statistical study would be very hard to construct. And there is the question of which Asians? Profs. Lynn and Vanhanen find that the average intelligence in Asian nations varies by as much as 20 points.

Children of any mixed marriage find themselves in the same position as my children. Are they white or Asian? Or, like George Zimmerman, white or Latino? There may never be statistical validation of this point, but it is common sense to stick with your own kind and to have children who don’t have to decide who they are.

What’s the solution?

To make ourselves attractive as marriage partners, we white people should learn once again to act responsibly. We should learn to respect each another. We should learn that true satisfaction comes from family. But what can you do if you want marriage and children when there are so few well-suited partners?

Look in the right places. Find religion. People who attend church are more likely to believe in the Christian tradition of monogamous marriage and family. Take on a self-improvement program: People who attend Toastmasters or take night courses are more likely to be just as conscientious in their romantic relationships. The people you will meet at Dale Carnegie or dance lessons are more likely to be outgoing and interested in forming stable relationships.

If you are a woman, you should attend American Renaissance conferences, where you will find many like-minded men. You will find younger people in identitarian groups. Don’t just attend — take leadership roles. Learn to speak publicly. If a person’s first impression is looking up at you on a podium, he might continue looking up at you.

You can expect the commenters on articles at American Renaissance to be on your wavelength. There are ways to protect your privacy — burner email addresses, SIM cards and Skype numbers — and still let people know how to reach you. The odds of finding a soulmate among people interested in the future of our people are certainly higher than on Tinder or eHarmony.

Millennial YouTube personalities such as Brittany Sellner (formerly Brittany Pettibone) and Blonde in the Belly of the Beast have an attractive message. Join the commenters on their YouTube pages or Mrs. Sellner’s book and make contact with them.

After my second divorce, I was too old to do these things. As a graduate student on an American campus from 2003 to 2006, I didn’t find anyone who would have interested me even if I had been young enough to be in the running. Two poignant books, “Sexual Utopia In Power” by Roger Devlin and “No Campus For White Men” by Scott Greer pretty well sum up my experience.

The logical choice for me was to look elsewhere. While there are substantial white populations in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, and southern Brazil, the largest number by far are in Europe. Women in just about every less-developed or recently-developed country, whatever their race, are less affected by cultural disease than women in the United States and Western Europe. Moreover, an American income is also more attractive to them.

I consider the Visegrad countries — Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, and the Baltics to be recently developed. Although their standards of living approach those of Western Europe, the people remain traditional. I am continually encouraged by their resistance to the dictates from the European Union that they take immigrants. They are standing their ground, asserting that they are Christian countries and want to stay that way. The former members of the Soviet Union — Russia itself, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine — might properly be considered underdeveloped. Average monthly salaries are less than $1,000. Though Western culture is making inroads, these peoples are still better marriage prospects.

Although most people think going abroad means American men looking for foreign brides, it works the other way. The men in these countries are more traditional. They tend to be more courtly, more inclined to observe the traditional courtesies such as opening doors. They can fix things. They expect to marry, the major constraint being whether they can afford it. At the same time, the characteristics now called “toxic masculinity” haven’t been beaten out of them. A white woman looking for a real man — with both the advantages and disadvantages — could do worse than Eastern Europe.

University has always been an ideal stage of life at which to meet a partner. All of Europe has a tradition of relatively inexpensive education. Here in Ukraine, education is ridiculously cheap — the most expensive schooling is about $5,000 per year for medical school. Moreover, at some universities, a lot of the courses are offered in English. A parent interested in the prospects of grandparenthood and the well-being of his wallet could do worse than to recommend that his children study overseas. Although it will probably take longer if the language of instruction is not English, the knowledge of a foreign language will be a lifelong asset, the experience with a foreign culture invaluable, and the possibility of a delightful (and philogenitive) partner is valuable.

Racial diversity brings differences that are hard to overcome in any context, differences that are on constant display in the United States and Western Europe. Marriage is the most intimate possible human relationship. The difference between men and women is already profound, and bridging it is challenge enough for any couple. As I have learned from costly experience, it does not make sense to burden a relationship with the added differences of miscegenation. Marry your own kind.

???? #racist occidentinvicta.com

My roommate works in a warehouse on the west side of Saskatoon and frequently shares anecdotes about work. Upper and middle management are white whereas the guys on the floor are mostly Pakistanis. With the setting laid out, lets proceed. My roommate would often complain about how much he despised the high stress environment at the warehouse, not because of an overbearing management, but because the Pakistani employees simply couldn’t get along with one another. They would gossip, backbite, and constantly undermine each other. Those that are familiar with the cultures of south Asia (India/Pakistan/Bangladesh) will observe that these societies are characterized as low morality and low trust cultures. Small wonder the Pakistanis can’t cooperate with one another in a setting that requires a high degree of trust. Part of the problem lies with their peculiar pattern of communication. South Asians don’t communicate openly and directly, rather, they calibrate their speech to not cause outward offense in order to save face.

In the collectivist cultures of South Asia, Saving face is an important social interaction mechanism aimed at preserving group harmony. I have written about it more extensively here. Requests and demands are obliquely phrased while the appropriate honourifics must be used when addressing others that are of a higher social standing than oneself. So while the white man may treat his south Asian acquaintances equally, those acquaintances may not treat each other the same way and their tribal languages have the functions of hierarchy and status built into them. All of this means that if protocol isn’t observed, causing offense is inevitable; which might disrupt productivity in a work setting. I’m not saying that south Asians aren’t hard working people, quite the contrary as these guys effortlessly complete all their objectives, however foreign values can have a disruptive effect if not dealt with firmly.

My recommendations:

Mandate the exclusive use of English at work: I’m surprised that management never considered this option in the first place. English, and other European languages, are built for the precise and efficient exchange of information, not communicating status. It is a flat language devoid of honourifics that reflects the western values of egalitarianism, equality, and high trust. These values are incompatible with the tribal south Asian values of hierarchy, status, face/honour, and low trust. By enforcing the exclusive use of English at work, management may in time eradicate interpersonal conflict issues amoung their south Asian workforce. Furthermore, the daily use of English for 8 hours a day may (in the long term) make these people more receptive to the western values outlined above. This would hopefully ease their assimilation into mainstream white culture.

Fight diversity with diversity: Why are there so many south Asians at this warehouse to begin with? We need more diversity; hire more whites! Maintaining a healthy ratio of whites to non whites (where whites should be a healthy majority) would aid immigrants acclimate to White culture, its protocols, and etiquette. They might in time learn to function in a high trust environment.

Got Questions #fundie gotquestions.org

Question: "Why did God allow polygamy / bigamy in the Bible?"

Answer: The question of polygamy is an interesting one in that most people today view polygamy as immoral while the Bible nowhere explicitly condemns it. The first instance of polygamy/bigamy in the Bible was that of Lamech in Genesis 4:19: “Lamech married two women.” Several prominent men in the Old Testament were polygamists. Abraham, Jacob, David, Solomon, and others all had multiple wives. Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines (essentially wives of a lower status), according to 1 Kings 11:3. What are we to do with these instances of polygamy in the Old Testament? There are three questions that need to be answered: 1) Why did God allow polygamy in the Old Testament? 2) How does God view polygamy today? 3) Why did it change?

1) Why did God allow polygamy in the Old Testament? The Bible does not specifically say why God allowed polygamy. As we speculate about God’s silence, there are a few key factors to consider. First, while there are slightly more male babies than female babies, due to women having longer lifespans, there have always been more women in the world than men. Current statistics show that approximately 50.5 percent of the world population are women. Assuming the same percentages in ancient times, and multiplied by millions of people, there would be tens of thousands more women than men. Second, warfare in ancient times was especially brutal, with an incredibly high rate of fatality. This would have resulted in an even greater percentage of women to men. Third, due to patriarchal societies, it was nearly impossible for an unmarried woman to provide for herself. Women were often uneducated and untrained. Women relied on their fathers, brothers, and husbands for provision and protection. Unmarried women were often subjected to prostitution and slavery. The significant difference between the number of women and men would have left many, many women in an undesirable situation.

So, it seems that God may have allowed polygamy to protect and provide for the women who could not find a husband otherwise. A man would take multiple wives and serve as the provider and protector of all of them. While definitely not ideal, living in a polygamist household was far better than the alternatives: prostitution, slavery, or starvation. In addition to the protection/provision factor, polygamy enabled a much faster expansion of humanity, fulfilling God’s command to “be fruitful and increase in number; multiply on the earth” (Genesis 9:7). Men are capable of impregnating multiple women in the same time period, causing humanity to grow much faster than if each man was only producing one child each year.

2) How does God view polygamy today? Even while allowing polygamy, the Bible presents monogamy as the plan which conforms most closely to God’s ideal for marriage. The Bible says that God’s original intention was for one man to be married to only one woman: “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife [not wives], and they will become one flesh [not fleshes]” (Genesis 2:24). While Genesis 2:24 is describing what marriage is, rather than how many people are involved, the consistent use of the singular should be noted. In Deuteronomy 17:14-20, God says that the kings were not supposed to multiply wives (or horses or gold). While this cannot be interpreted as a command that the kings must be monogamous, it can be understood as declaring that having multiple wives causes problems. This can be clearly seen in the life of Solomon (1 Kings 11:3-4).

In the New Testament, 1 Timothy 3:2, 12 and Titus 1:6 give “the husband of one wife” in a list of qualifications for spiritual leadership. There is some debate as to what specifically this qualification means. The phrase could literally be translated “a one-woman man.” Whether or not this phrase is referring exclusively to polygamy, in no sense can a polygamist be considered a “one-woman man.” While these qualifications are specifically for positions of spiritual leadership, they should apply equally to all Christians. Should not all Christians be “above reproach...temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money” (1 Timothy 3:2-4)? If we are called to be holy (1 Peter 1:16), and if these standards are holy for elders and deacons, then they are holy for all.

Ephesians 5:22-33 speaks of the relationship between husbands and wives. When referring to a husband (singular), it always also refers to a wife (singular). “For the husband is the head of the wife [singular] … He who loves his wife [singular] loves himself. For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife [singular], and the two will become one flesh....Each one of you also must love his wife [singular] as he loves himself, and the wife [singular] must respect her husband [singular].” While a somewhat parallel passage, Colossians 3:18-19, refers to husbands and wives in the plural, it is clear that Paul is addressing all the husbands and wives among the Colossian believers, not stating that a husband might have multiple wives. In contrast, Ephesians 5:22-33 is specifically describing the marital relationship. If polygamy were allowable, the entire illustration of Christ’s relationship with His body (the church) and the husband-wife relationship falls apart.

3) Why did it change? It is not so much God’s disallowing something He previously allowed as it is God’s restoring marriage to His original plan. Even going back to Adam and Eve, polygamy was not God’s original intent. God seems to have allowed polygamy to solve a problem, but it is not the ideal. In most modern societies, there is absolutely no need for polygamy. In most cultures today, women are able to provide for and protect themselves—removing the only “positive” aspect of polygamy. Further, most modern nations outlaw polygamy. According to Romans 13:1-7, we are to obey the laws the government establishes. The only instance in which disobeying the law is permitted by Scripture is if the law contradicts God’s commands (Acts 5:29). Since God only allows for polygamy, and does not command it, a law prohibiting polygamy should be upheld.

Are there some instances in which the allowance for polygamy would still apply today? Perhaps, but it is unfathomable that there would be no other possible solution. Due to the “one flesh” aspect of marriage, the need for oneness and harmony in marriage, and the lack of any real need for polygamy, it is our firm belief that polygamy does not honor God and is not His design for marriage.

Kimberly Yam & John Kuo Wei Tchen #fundie huffingtonpost.com

(You know how Alt-shite always say that only whites have multiculturalism "forced" on them, while other groups are encouraged to have ethnically pure countries? I think those people are trying to support them.)

A White Person Wrote ‘Why Anyone Can Be Chinese,’ And It’s A Checklist In Privilege

A white scholar’s recent op-ed suggests he might need some lessons on his own privilege.

Daniel Bell, a white dean at China’s Shandong University, recently penned a piece in the Wall Street Journal entitled “Why Anyone Can Be Chinese.” In it, he laments how he’s not considered Chinese despite his self-proclaimed dedication to the culture.

China, he argues, should look at identity as cultural rather than racial, concluding the piece with his ultimate hope:

“President Xi Jinping describes his broad agenda for the country as the ‘China dream,’” Bell writes. “My own China dream is more modest: to be viewed as a Chinese not just in my own mind but in the minds of my fellow Chinese.”

Bell claims to have respect for the Chinese. But his piece shows that he’s not looking at identity through the lens of the Chinese, John Kuo Wei Tchen, associate professor and director of Asian/Pacific/American Institute, NYU

Bell begins his piece, making comparisons between himself and a Chinese-American who “doesn’t speak Chinese or identify in any way with Chinese culture,” and “forcefully rejects” the label “Chinese.”

But the connections Bell makes are apples to oranges. Bell, a white man from Canada, ignores the real, human experiences that Chinese people live through, Tchen noted.

Bell isn’t someone whose family has been brought up in China through generations, communicating through insider references. His ancestors haven’t lived through events like the Opium Wars or the Cultural Revolution that have shaped the population’s outlook. Bell is a white man whose roots and values come from elsewhere.

There’s another issue at hand with Bell’s comparison. Ideas of belonging and identity are tied to political environment, Tchen says. These concepts are forged out of history and traditions, constructed over time by cultural and political forces. A western view of these ideas will be different from, say, a Chinese one. Bell doesn’t seem to acknowledge that, though.

“Notions of citizenship and belonging come out of particular political cultures. Just because that’s what he believes in, he wants to apply that to China which doesn’t really make any sense,” Tchen said. “It can’t just be willy-nilly applied to any other place.”

Bell continues his argument, listing several traits of his that he believes somehow underscore his “Chineseness.” Though he brings up possible barriers to acceptance like citizenship, commitment to culture, and lack of language skills, he insists those aren’t problems for him. He points out how he’s often “the only person wearing Chinese-style clothing” at conferences. And earlier in the piece he mentions his marriage to a Chinese woman as if those details help assert Chineseness.

In another line, he even puts down native Chinese people and pretentiously writes, “millions of poorly educated Chinese citizens speak hardly any Mandarin, and yet nobody questions their Chineseness.”

However, identity isn’t so simple as checking traits off a list, Tchen said. Bell’s possession of such qualities does not make him more “eligible” to be Chinese.

To be Chinese is not a mere checklist, just like being black or from any other culture isn’t about hitting a set number of achievements.

“If he were to become an expert on Toni Morrison, if he were to then master African-American cuisine, if he had married an African-American woman, would he feel he can claim being African-American or black?” Tchen questioned.

At one point, Bell attempts to point out the flaws in seeing Chineseness as racial and describes the country’s tumultuous relationship with foreigners.

“When China is powerful and secure, foreigners are welcome and considered employable, including at the highest levels of government,” he wrote in the op-ed. “When China is weak, foreigners are often viewed with suspicion and even hatred.”

Tchen told HuffPost that he agrees that ideally, we “need to reject the very notion of ‘race’ and hence racial belonging.” These ideas don’t translate across historical and cultural differences, he says. But again, being part of a culture is dependent on historical context. Identity goes further than today’s politics and culture.

At the end of the day, Bell’s piece begs the question posed by Tchen.

“Are there not deeper shared values that are more important to explore than a European Canadian wanting to be accepted as ‘Chinese?’”

Krystian Kowalczyk #racist vnnforum.com

[Thread entitled "WHITE women travel to Jamaica to PAY for sex with BLACK men"]

...They're lucky that the commie Jews decided to elevate them above their pathetic status. Without Jewish money, power and influence, blacks would probably not even be in this country - they'd likely have been repatriated (if only!).

Black is the new color of privilege. Women want to screw blacks thanks to decades of propaganda and destruction of the patriarchal White system that would previously have considered race-mixing a taboo. Blacks are portrayed as cool and more likely to succeed. None of the images that the media and the establishment associate with blacks have any grounding in reality. Real blacks are uncivilized, vile, animalistic savages which is why White women who take up with the apes usually end up poor/unhappy/addicted or dead.

So laugh now. But in some years, your kind will still live in their own shit and the rest of the world will have moved on. You (as in all of you) have not accomplished anything of value and never will.

Judy Byington #wingnut #crackpot #conspiracy inteldinarchronicles.blogspot.com

On a daily basis the Cabal has tried to prevent the RV <ed. The Global Currency Reevaluation> from happening including constantly hacking into the global financial system to steal funds and sending out false reports on the reset.

On Mon. 20 July there were 27 US Treasury and Federal Reserve employees who were arrested for interfering with the start of the RV.

On Tues. 21 July the currencies of North Korea, Iran, Lebanon and Venezuela completed their conversion to the Quantum Financial System, which resulted in the QFS automatically replacing the old SWIFT global financial system, plus completed the fiat US dollar’s conversion to a gold/ asset-backed US Note (USN) to be ready for payouts and exchanges.

Tues. 21 July was also the beginning of eight weeks of historic legislation enactment that would return us to the original Constitution and implementation of NESARA. President Trump said, “The next eight weeks (from Tues. 21 July onward) will be incredible.”

On Wed. 22 July afternoon President Trump announced the expansion of Operation Legend, an interagency law enforcement effort led by the Department of Justice. The Operation was named after four year-old LeGend Taliferro who was shot and killed in his bed after a gunman opened fire on an apartment complex in Kansas City, Missouri on June 29. Operation Legend’s purpose was to quell the unacceptable levels of recent violence in U.S. cities. Over the next three weeks the Justice Department planned to expand the initiative into Chicago, Albuquerque, Cleveland, Detroit and Milwaukee.

Also on Wed. 22 July Q was exposed as being a multitude of knowledgeable sources based at the White House whose mission was to expose vital Intel to the general public. Because of ongoing fake news reports in the Mass Media, Q would be replaced with seven different Intel providers, or Digital Warriors, so that people could form their own opinion of what was taking place in our nation based on actual facts.

As of 4 pm Wed. 22 July audits which included financial, staffing, security, etc, were completed on the reset process, which passed with flying colors and allowed things to move forward.

Wed 22 July at midnight EDT there was a Global Currency Reset. Redemption Center staff and bankers were put on High Alert for a Tier 4b start.

Liv Heide #racist #wingnut amren.com

Quality Matters

As a farmer’s daughter, I grew up surrounded by nature and animals. My father, like both of my grandfathers, was a very active and successful hunter, who turned the entrance hall of my parents’ house into a trophy gallery.

Our family’s men all had hunting dogs. I especially remember my grandfather’s German Shorthaired Pointer named Edda and several of my father’s Small Münsterländers, which had an excellent reputation as loyal hunting dogs for small game. The breed had been brought back almost from extinction at the end of the 19th century through some remaining lines found in the region of Münster, Germany.

The optimization of qualities is the obvious goal of any dog breeder. Not even a race-despising, self-proclaimed “anti-racist” can deny this. Not long ago, a hunter’s ability to feed his family depended on the intelligence, nose, swimming capabilities, and prey drive of his dogs. Recreational hunters still value these qualities and understand breed purity. I do not know much about equestrian sports, but horse breeders take the same approach in what is a $300 billion worldwide industry.

Yet when it comes to humans, we are expected to believe that physical, mental, and moral qualities have nothing to do with breed or race — that we are just one race: the human race. Like dogs — there is only the dog race?

To expose this laughable double-standard, I made a video and entered it in the Last Message to the West video contest run by Jared George of The Great Order. The contest is open for voting here (you have to register your email to do so). You can also watch my video at the same link.
I openly invite viewers to reject the taboo against seeing humans in racial categories, and urge them to strive for racial optimization in health, intelligence, creativity, and — last but not least — beauty. I dare them to look at humans as animal breeders look at animals, and I won’t apologize for it.

Animal breeders want to achieve certain results, and — let’s be honest — so do we. I am quite certain that none of the female members on my website WhiteDate.Net hope to reproduce one day with a man who looks like the hunchback of Notre Dame. Men do not dream of a hideous and mentally retarded wife and mother of their future children. Men and women alike, more or less subconsciously, even try to look for traits in a partner that would correct their shortcomings, such as height or hair quality. Sweeping this under the rug does not change the universal truth that finding a partner is and has always been a eugenic choice.

I am also quite certain that a pregnant woman looking for information on hypnobirthing online wonders why the YouTube algorithm suggests videos about “A Day with 4 Handicapped Children,” “My Abortion Story”, “I am Sophia – Life of a Transgender Child,” or “Beauty Queen with Down Syndrome,” etc.

You almost get the impression that the biggest video platform welcomes anything dysgenic and unnatural while it normalizes the elimination of perfectly healthy embryos. By strange coincidence, everyone in these videos is white. A dog or horse breeder would tell us that a strong, functioning society needs healthy, intelligent, productive people.

Well, looking at what our ancestors have built, we woke white people understand what we are capable of, because these qualities are enshrined in our DNA. We woke white people feel a responsibility to maintain and improve these qualities, even if only for the sake of honoring what defines us: our race!

14WordsFlorida #racist stormfront.org

True enough, but it's just as selfish to be aware that your people face such a future and decide not to have any children.

I'm pregnant with my first child right now. Being an activist for the cause I realize how important it is to have children. A defeatist attitude is a victory for the enemy. Yes we, and future generations face a tough road but it's going to be even worse if there's no one left to fight for our survival. There's a few people that have this same outlook that "oh why don't I just spare them the tough times by not having any" that's just racial suicide.

Any race that would voluntarily abstain from reproducing in mass is just looking to give up and die. Our greatest set back is people too scared to stand up and do something. Even if someone didn't want to become an activist and just raise a racially aware healthy white family is a victory for us.

It's not natural for healthy people not to want to have children. The divine, nature, how ever you choose to view the greater workings of things made man and woman different for a reason. Luckily our numbers are increasing due to more births and that's a great thing to embrace. If you do not wish to have white children, then why even bother to care about the future, your bloodline won't have one because you consider to voluntarily end it.

No parent wants to see their children being enslaved or faced with great struggle so I can understand to a degree what you and others may feel but it's not the way and you need to have more faith in our race and not be so willing to be first in line to contribute to racial suicide.

Every race needs to have at least one offspring per person to maintain their population. With homosexuality, feminism, race mixing and economic strife harming our race Whites aren't having nearly as many children on average as they should. Many groups like my group have some plans to have a more community based group so even if we can't afford to have many children we will help each other get by with donations, baby/infant toy and clothing swaps etc.

Anyway you really should consider having children, if you need any reason to care about your race it's them. Without our children, there will be no future for us.

Corey Savage #sexist returnofkings.com

8 Factors That Are Destroying Healthy Relationships Between Men And Women

Corey is an iconoclast and the author of 'Man's Fight for Existence'. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature. Visit his new website at primalexistence.com

Most men, even if they’re still swimming in ocean of blue pills, have some awareness that something has gone awry with the relationship between men and women. Statistics prove this as well as divorce has been epidemic for a while now with record-number of children growing up with single parent around the world while young people are having less sex than before. And whether you be a feminist or part of the manosphere, I think both sides can agree on one thing: that a war between the sexes have been heating up in the recent years.

Why is all this happening? While men and women tend to play the blame game to avoid taking any responsibility, there are greater forces at play. The fact is, the continuing transformation of our society is making the antagonism between the sexes inevitable. Feminism is just a symptom, not the cause of our problems.

Before we look at why today’s sex relations are in a dismal state, consider the single factor that makes relationships prosper: Mutuality based on different but compatible roles.

All relationships work best when two parties have something different to share for their mutual benefit. For example, humans and horses have enjoyed a close relationship together throughout history (unlike, say, humans and bears). The relationship works because in exchange for food, protection, and care that humans provide, the horses offer themselves as transportation.

The relationship between men and women was also mutually beneficial for the entirety of human existence with men offering their services in exchange for having the women bear their children. But now, with the advent of modern society and its conditions, things have changed drastically.

1. “Equality”
image
At least these men had their male privilege.

“Equality” for women is the most abominable lie to have ever perpetuated on mankind.

Men have always provided for women. Men hunted for food, labored to build everything, and fought battles to defend their tribe. To say that men oppressed women throughout history is an insult to all those who sacrificed themselves in the factories, the coal mines, and the trenches. If women didn’t have certain rights that feminists like to cherry-pick, it’s because women weren’t drafted to fight wars. In exchange for their toil, the only thing men asked of women was to be supportive in their roles as wives and mothers.

But fast-forward to today, now that women have “achieved” social and political “equality” and even various advantages just for being born a female, many women today no longer feel that it’s necessary to exchange values with men for mutuality. It’s like when humans developed automobiles and didn’t need horses anymore. The difference is, humans and horses don’t need to be together; men and women do.

However, men’s sexual desire—which is greater than that of females—is still alive and kicking. So what we have today is a situation where women have gotten their social equality while sexual inequality persists for men (which is why many men choose to give up sex entirely to level the playing field). This is what happens when you standardize human beings into economic units.

2. Education and career over family

Stressed out from balancing between work and family? Yup, it’s the men’s fault that you tried to do both.

To maintain their advantage over men, women today are dedicating themselves to their education and career. Western women, in particular, have been so thoroughly sold on the idea of status and consumerist orgy that they are no longer interested in relationships. More and more women today are delaying marriage (if not outright rejecting it). And when they do get married, they are using it as a means to trap men into donating their sperm and cash, only to bail out when they want to.

3. Slut culture
image
Wow, what an achievement! I’m sure your failed parents are just as proud.

The advent of contraception and the decimation of whatever feminine decency that was left has turned the vast majority of young Western women into drunken sluts. The increasing number of sluts is diminishing the availability of quality women that men want to start a family with and has social implications for the society as a whole.

4. Government supplanting men
image

The only way women were able to “liberate” themselves from their supposed oppressors was by latching themselves on to a new alpha provider: the government. As said before, men form relationships with women by exchanging values, with his strength to provide and protect being his greatest asset. But now, the government (along with corporations and education system) fulfills those roles that men previously occupied. And not only that, but the government is deeply involved in the affairs of marriage, sending professional white-knights to extort and arrest men who’ve been used up and thrown away by women.

It also doesn’t help that the government is increasingly monopolizing violence, one of the most important value that a man possesses. And that leads to my next point.

5. Too few wars, too many men
image
I doubt these men had to think of ways to entertain women like a monkey to get their attention.

The recurring theme across patriarchal societies of the past and present are violence and warfare. And the most commonly associated traits of masculinity are also traits of warriors such as strength, bravery, aggression, discipline, and so on. It’s quite simple: the more violent the environment is, the more masculine men become. And the more conflicts and wars there are, the more the women depend on men—thus keeping the collective value of male population high.

It’s no coincidence that Western societies have started to feminize as they endured decades of relative peace since the end of WWII. The lack of warfare also means that there are now more young men per woman (practically 1 to 1) than there normally would have been under a warring society. Excess of men—who are also emasculated and feminized—means that the collective value of average men has dropped to a historical low, upsetting the balance of sexual marketplace in the process. Only the top 5-10% of men with the warrior traits and wealth are able to enjoy a semblance of a balanced relationship with women—and even they have to play the game.

6. The decimation of Western women

Declining marriage rates? Don’t worry, some simps will try to put a ring on their fingers.

Many Western women have been corrupted by our toxic materialist society. They are fatter, uglier, more narcissistic, more entitled, hedonistic, superficial, less faithful, and seem to think that having bitch attitude makes them hip. Women can afford to stoop low because their sex drive isn’t the same as men’s, while they couldn’t care less for love and companionship when they’re too busy with their travels and careers.

And because of all the thirsty men, women’s collective sexual market value hardly suffers while the value of those who are merely average becomes inflated beyond their real value. You only need to check out the gross discrepancies between the sexes in dating sites and apps to see how bad things are.

7. Anti-male culture

Men are all rapists waiting to be hatched out of their facade, men merely uttering a word to a woman is a harassment, men are always “mansplaining” to women, men are insecure cry-babies, men open their legs too much when they sit, men and their toxic masculinity need to be controlled, men have to do more for women, men are dominating in tech fields because of sexism, men shouldn’t say this, men shouldn’t do that, etc, etc… And of course, if men push back, they’re “misogynists.”

And we’re we still wondering why relationships are getting harder to form these days?

8. Lack of shared values

As social beings, we humans need more than economic incentives and passions to form a relationship for a family to prosper. There must be shared values.

With traditional family values under constant attack from all directions, the bonding between males and females have been reduced to mere hook-ups and economic unions. To make matters worse, many from both sides are resorting to predatory behaviors to exploit one another for either money (for women) or sex (for men), augmenting the distrust between the two sexes. Others, who either don’t want to play games or have become overtly hostile to the opposite sex, have given up on relationships entirely. This is the end result of atomization and extreme individualism under a system that destroys all values for the sake of economic advancement.

Conclusion

The destruction of sex relationship is having a negative effect on society as a whole and is transforming the demographic landscape of many Western nations. Unlike what the aesthetically-challenged feminists and the man-children crying their own way believe, men and women are not adversaries. You don’t have to be a traditionalist to see that the sex relations have gone awry due to the development of modern society and its destructive cultures.

Many Western men have already checked out or gone out to find traditional women elsewhere. But that is merely adapting to the situation; it doesn’t solve the problem at a societal level. The continuing antagonism of the sexes will eventually spread around the world. Unless the current course is somehow reversed, we can only wait and see how far the damage will run its course.

Corey Savage #sexist returnofkings.com

7 Ways Modern Women Treat Men Like Dogs

Corey is an iconoclast and the author of ‘Man’s Fight for Existence’. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature.

For all the feminist criticism of men supposedly treating women like dogs, it is actually today’s feminism-infected women that are treating men like domesticated animals.

While the majority of women still prefer masculine men for relationships, I’ve been noticing how more and more women today are defying their biology for ideological reasons and are pursuing long-term relationship with men they’re not even attracted to just because they are supplicant and effeminate. If this trend continues unabated, I expect the entire male population to turn into weak and feckless bonobos who grovel around to serve female interests.

Observe the following comparisons to see how men are being turned into dogs for both women and the state:

1. Dogs are optional

Dogs as pets are optional. People get a dog only when they want one; it’s not a necessity. Men today are also increasingly becoming an object of utility for a woman rather than a man whom she forms a bond with for a nuclear family. She will marry a man when she wants to (if at all) and she will dump him when she feels like it.

2. Once attached, dogs offer unconditional loyalty

If you want a picture of what the feminists want from men, just imagine a world where all men are male feminists.

Once dogs have a human to call a master, it doesn’t care whether he is a scumbag, loser, criminal, or homeless. Dogs are faithful no matter who their master is and what he does. In fact, they’re so loyal that they’ll even remain with an owner that mistreats them. And that’s exactly what feminists want men to be.

If you observe the rhetoric of the feminists, you’ll notice two general themes: first, the desire to be free from all criticisms. And second, for men to believe them and “support” them no matter what. Feminists want their prospective low-testosterone boyfriends and husbands to fully accept them for who they are no matter how disgusting, slutty, crass, and toxic they are. They want their men to show unconditional loyalty so that they can openly cheat on them and brag about it. And men, if they don’t want to be called a misogynist, must never question their partner’s past or present behavior and remain faithful even if they’re treated like garbage.

3. Dogs do what they’re told

Once the owner has secured his dog’s loyalty, he can train it to behave on command. Some owners enjoy the power they have over their companions and they will order their dogs around for fun.

Western women today have discovered that there are truck loads of desperate men who will do just about anything for them to win an ounce of female approval. These women have successfully used men to take them out on expensive dinners (only make fun of them on their blogs afterwards), buy pizza for them for free, shovel snow for them, and so on. The women who order these men around like dogs didn’t even have to train them as they’ve already been conditioned from birth by the society to do what women tells them to do.

4. Dogs are treated for good behavior
image
Dogs need to be treated to reinforce good behavior; the same is true when you want to domesticate men as second-rate citizens.

Women understand just how desperate the general male population is for affection and sex. Women today are leveraging this power over men to make them behave the way they want them to, rewarding these simps with faked compliments so that they’ll continue being good boys.

5. Dogs defend their masters
image
One serves a man, the other serves the government and its harem of women.

Besides companionship, the main roles dogs play is to defend their masters. In spite of all the calls for equality, the reality is that women still expect men to defend and save them. The men suffering from white knight syndrome will go as far as sacrificing their own lives to rescue women they don’t even know.

Feminists also don’t mind that many men are serving the police and military force to serve their alpha boyfriend: the government. Women are innately attracted to power and the government is the new protector and provider of women that grows bigger and stronger each day while ordinary men are becoming weaker and irrelevant.

6. Dogs are neutered

Although men aren’t getting physically neutered the way dogs are, other methods are being employed to psychologically castrate men. This includes the epidemic use of ADHD drugs to tame boys, ridiculous laws aimed at controlling men’s sexual interactions with women, and the overall cultural currents to shame masculinity while promoting all sorts of degeneracy that dilute it. Today’s wives don’t even want to get sexual with their husbands.

7. Dogs that are not domesticated are pests

“Masculine men are organizing a meeting? They must be rapists!”

When a dog is not owned by a human being, it is considered a pest that needs to be controlled.

Men today who do not submit to the feminist agenda are constantly attacked as being losers, sexists, misogynists, rapists, and so on. In today’s feminist society, you either serve the female imperative or you’re a Neanderthal who is out of touch with the times. Steps are already being made to control every aspect of male behavior in public.

You should also remember that dogs are natural pack animals (think of their cousins, wolves). By being removed from the pack, they become isolated and dependent on their masters. Can you see how the same applies for today’s men?

The Differences

In addition to being dogs, men are also expected to serve as drones to keep the feminist nanny-state running.

In spite of all the similarities, there are differences that need to be addressed.

First, unlike dogs whose owners house them and feed them, men are not supported by women. Women are free to throw men away like used tampons or divorce their husbands to extract their cash. If anything, men are usually the ones who must provide for their wives.

Second, whereas dogs are under the responsibility of their owners, men are expected to be fully responsible in all their interactions with women. It is the man’s job to ensure that a woman is giving consent even if both parties are drunk; it is men who must watch over their own behavior to ensure that what they say is non-offensive and conforming; and it is men who must ensure that women feel perfectly safe and comfortable in all their interactions. If you so much as walk past a woman in the wrong manner, you’ll be accused of rape. Again, it is the man’s responsibility to ensure that he is acceptable enough to share the same space as women, not the other way around. Feminists want “equality” without accountability.

Are men becoming collectively domesticated?
image
The domesticated cows we see on farms didn’t end up the way they are now naturally. It was through thousands of years of herding and selective breeding that they became smaller, more passive, and accepting of their conditions. But the fact is, it doesn’t take thousands of years to transform entire species. In this article which I recommend you read, a Soviet project to domesticate foxes have shown that it only takes several generations of selective breeding to transform wild foxes into effeminate and tamed versions of themselves.

The global testosterone level around the world has been mysteriously dropping for the past few decades. While chemical toxins in all the products we consume and come in contact with has been given as one possible explanation, I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that we as species are gradually becoming emasculated at a genetic level through the selective breeding process. In other words, we are becoming socially engineered to be effeminate. It’s not something impossible when you consider that easily tamable beta males, the sperm donors, are usually the males women select as their mates after they themselves are done riding the cock-carousel. I think it’s a factor we should consider besides the emasculation through cultural degeneracy that we’re already familiar with.

Men are supposed to be men unleashing their primal energy through raw adventure instead of getting tamed into submission. I have no doubt that the systematic domestication efforts of today is what is causing collective male nihilism, depression, and frustrated energy. Men who are awake must allow themselves be men.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out Roosh's book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain our operation.

gendercritfem and others #transphobia reddit.com

From /r/"two"xchromosomes: TIM gets excited by forcing other women to change around him, "cuddling" with them at the afterparty. Classic AGP sleepover fantasy.

image

Ah, yes, it's the "small little everyday things", like ogling women in dressing rooms. Oh, I'm sorry, did I say women? I forgot, they're "girls".

“At the end of the night another bridesmaid and I were so exhausted that we slept on each other basically cuddling at the after party.”

You felt up an unconscious woman.

“It was just something girl friends do. All these things are just those small things that all my life I've felt I've been missing out on because of my situation.”

Nope, as a woman, I can assure you that I've never groped any of my unconscious friends before. In fact, it seems like people in your situation tend to do this more than actual women...

“For one of the first times in my life I finally was able to feel like who I really am”

A creep? A sexual harasser?

“a woman.”

Fuck you.

@CallaAETHIOPICA

Me either. I hug my friends for sure, but we aren’t constantly cuddling or even holding hands. TIMs have such weird views about women.

@gendercritfem

This just in: heterosexual men view women primarily through the lens of their sexuality.

More on this breaking story tonight at 10:00.

@ringsofsaturnine

And women find this hard to report, because they're told that if they feel uncomfortable with it, or speak out about it, they're transphobic bigots. Rapists never stop looking for loopholes, and this identity politics shit is their holy grail of loopholes.

@gendercritfem

Yeah, it's really Kafkaesque how a subculture of cross-dressing homosexuals has gotten hijacked by a bunch of straight male predators, and we now have to take them seriously as a political movement.

@Didush

In their endless quest for validation, they absolutely HAVE to push their way into every female space. They've found their way into places like r/tallgirls, r/makeupaddiction, and even fucking r/PCOS (!!!!!). But there's no greater irony than seeing XY men post in a sub called twoxchromosomes. It would be hilarious if it weren't for the fact that people apparently are so willing to concede these spaces to them, which is kinda disturbing

@gendercritfem

The worst is on the lesbian subs, where they're super concentrated because, as it turns out, there are a lot more guys who are into women than there are women.

Also, lmao at them going on PCOS. Yeah, if a TIM ever gets ovarian cysts, I'll consider him fully welcome there, but I'll be thoroughly impressed.

@__Lannister__

I literally just saw a comment the other day in the main lesbian sub made by a TIM saying that lesbians are welcome there. It pissed me off and made me peak again. OF COURSE I BELONG HERE IN A SUB NAMED AFTER ME - an actual lesbian. It's everyone else that doesn't belong there! It was like a house guest eating my cereal telling me I'm welcome to eat my cereal. No shit you fucking freak.

@ringsofsaturnine

They're fucking settler colonialists of gender. You invite them in as a guest, and they shit on your floor and when you complain, kick you out of your own house. And steal your name and start pretending they're you and you never even lived there, never mind existed.

@gendercritfem

Oh dear, I'm just trying to imagine the dread and horror every woman in that sub must feel at the prospect of being compared to a TIM. Imagine how horrified and disgusted they must feel to be told that yes, the worst insults they've ever heard are right, and they really are just the same as a man.

@Iittlewolfie

I just read that post, fuckin barf. So many handmaidens going “Thank you wow our struggles are so similar 💖”, saying he’s a “goddess”.

Libfem women bow down to TIMs. They can’t help themselves. Doing so satisfies their savior complex. It makes them feel good about themselves to go “yaaas queen we are exactly the same”. Same navel-gazing nonsense as always. Not only does it make them look selfless and caring, but they also get to placate men. It’s obvious that even though many women say they see transwomen as exactly the same as us because it’s the nice thing to do, we don’t.

Libfem women don’t treat TIMs like women. They treat TIMs like special men.

@ringsofsaturnine

But how do you know they have XY??? Do you karyotype every person you meet??? Do you know your own karyotype??? No? So Trans. Women. Are. Women. Repeat after me. And talking about chromosomes is literal violence. There are no differences between women, you cisnormative transphobic TERF. /s

Prometheus #fundie answers.yahoo.com

[someone asked if there was any proof of a "firmament" having existed]

hold on a minute, this is not a ridiculous claim, and you should give your mother more credibility since she has more experience in life ! Things that you are taught in school and which you read in the popualr media are not always true. I know this to be a fact since I have done years of research in this and other fields.
\ First of all there is no "proof" one way or the other and none will ever be found. However there is a ton of evidence, as I will explain.
I have looked into this matter and researched. it There is strong evidence for example that there was a great flood of which the Bible speaks and which incidentally is recorded in many cultures around the world, not just the Bible. It seems very likely that the flood occurred as a result of a global catastrophic climate change . This was the end of the ice age about 12,500 years ago. Before this great flood the sky was different and no sun or Moon could be seen - just a massive cloud cover.
The great climate change occurred due to some great Earth changes whcih altered the currents of the oceans worldwide. The ocean currents also reciprocate by influencing th climate. The jets streams are also very important in climatology.
This climate change is thought that this was due perhaps to a global 'volcanic winter'; which was triggered by many volcanoes going off at once around the world. This is a very long and complex story and there are many factors to be considered. Remember that the Bible says in Genesis that "the world was barren and laid waste"... this is precisely what would occur in this scenario.
Read up on the Siberian flats or the Deccan Flats for exam,ple. The Siberian Flats is an area in Siberia as big as the continental USA which is covered with volcanoes . The depth of the lava over this entire region is abvout 5000 feet (one mile). There is much to learn about the ancient history of the Earth. and I cant include it all here.
There are even Western scientists who do believe that there was an atomic war on this planet long ago. The evidence can be seen in the rock layers. In fact this is commonly believed in the Hindu philosophy / religion.

Source(s):

research Bible, history, geology, paleontology, climatology, mythology, etc..

John #fundie beginningandend.com

We must learn to distinguish God’s judicial pronouncements from his commands about a way of life for us so as not to mix apples and oranges. The removal of the Canaanite peoples was a judicial ruling by God. Consider, in the USA we give people rights. But those rights can be taken away if people commit a crime. Its called prison. Is that hypocrisy to say people have rights (out of one side of our mouth) but then put them into prison ( out of the other)? No because those persons gave up many of their rights when they committed a crime. There were no prisons in Canaan. As a judicial ruling, God told Israel to dispossess the people in the land. They were either to kill them or in some cases enslave them. The Canaanites had already lost all of their rights and were under God’s just judgment. There was no justification for arbitrary chattel slavery in the Bible — (the kind which we knew in antebellum times) … in fact the slavery which kidnapped people and sold them as property was punishable by death (Exodus 21:16) .

No they were ONLY to kill or enslave under God’s direct verbal orders – Remember, He is God so His judicial ruling is more just than any human court has ever been since He knows all of our crimes perfectly. So When Israel killed people they were simply acting as God’s hand, speeding up the death sentence we all justly deserve.

You think this racist because it targets foreigners? Think again. God also warned the Israelites that they were not immune from the Canaanites’ judgment: “But if you do not drive out the inhabitants of the land, those you allow to remain will become barbs in your eyes and thorns in your sides. They will give you trouble in the land where you will live. And then I will do to you what I plan to do to them.’ “(Numbers 33:55-56). So not only were foreigners made slaves … when the Israelites disobeyed God – REMEMBER – they were carried off in the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities. So God is not partial or racist.

Richard Swinburne #fundie cnn.netscape.cnn.com

Math Proves Christ's Resurrection?

It is faith, not proof, that makes Christians believe in Jesus Christ's resurrection, the central tenet of the religion. Until now.

Oxford University professor Richard Swinburne, a leading philosopher of religion, has seemingly done the impossible. Using logic and mathematics, he has created a formula that he says shows a 97 percent certainty that Jesus Christ was resurrected by God the Father, report The Age and Catholic News.

This stunning conclusion was made based on a series of complex calculations grounded in the following logic:

1. The probably of God's existence is one in two. That is, God either exists or doesn't.
2. The probability that God became incarnate, that is embodied in human form, is also one in two.
3. The evidence for God's existence is an argument for the resurrection.
4. The chance of Christ's resurrection not being reported by the gospels has a probability of one in 10.
5. Considering all these factors together, there is a one in 1,000 chance that the resurrection is not true.

T3 #racist stormfront.org

I don't think he claims that they're not White, just that black hair always mean sohttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VSj96ztC-6cme, even if very little, non-White heritage. I think he also annoyed some of the darker Italians with claims that they're indistinguishable from Arabs. Got to love Varg but he's certainly not interesting in pleasing everyone/anyone :-p

Considering that he's a blonde Norwegian, I wouldn't blame him if he wouldn't want to date someone with black hair. I wonder if there are black haired Whites who think in a similar way.

Couldn't find a specific video by him about this but I guess this shows some of his general attitude and may or may not have influenced the comments re black hair.

Hairmixing and eyemixing??? All whites already have below replacement birthrates. The average person already has a long list of expectations for a future spouse. This sounds like a great way to further prevent white babies from being born.

image

So you think a blonde Scandinavian pairing up with a brown eyed and black and curly haired, brown eyed, darker skinned Italian (possibly with a hook nose :-p), is a good idea? Because there are too many blondes with blue eyes in the world?

No offence to all the Italians who don't look like that. My Italian ex was dark blonde. I did go to school with a Sicilian though who looked as described above. Nice guy but wouldn't have been my first choice for my sister, to be frank. It wouldn't be the end of the world either, of course, though some of these types can be hard to tell apart from a certain kind of Jew.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy truthernews.wordpress.com

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Based on breaking news and events, it appears that the Obama administration (at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland) is preparing to execute a wave of Greyhound-related terror attacks in the Unites States, namely in Texas during JADE HELM 15 which concludes on September 15, 2015.

Coincidentally, it was just revealed on July 24, 2015, that Greyhound has launched a new bus service from Mexico to Texas (see below). The service appears to have been specifically created in order to transport ISIS-inspired terrorists from Mexico to the Lone Star state in order to execute Greyhound-related attacks.

Greyhound-related terror attacks, should they transpire, will likely consist of gun-related assaults, beheadings and/or suicide bombings on Greyhound buses or at Greyhound bus station. Said attack will predictably be scapegoated onto state-sponsored Islamic terror groups (e.g., Al Shabaab, Al Qaeda, ISIS, etc.).

The notion that the CIA is plotting Greyhound-related terror attacks was first identified back on February 23, 2013, when new TSA terror screenings were instituted at Greyhound stations across America. Similar to airports, the new policy incorporates the TSA into the travel process so that they can control any subsequent terror investigation.

Since the progenitors of terror want to ensure that Greyhound bus-related terror attacks are caught on camera, it was revealed on February 23, 2013, that Greyhound has deployed video cameras across their entire fleet. The installation of camera ensures that the attacks can be seen on the internet and broadcast on TV, exponentially compounding the terror factor of the attack.

Roughly 19-months later on September 22, 2014, it was revealed that Greyhound has introduced a new onboard Wi-Fi platform. Since the attacks will likely feature a hostage situation followed by beheadings and suicide attacks, Greyhound passengers will be able to broadcast the entire attack live on the internet as it happens, drawing in hundreds of millions of viewers in the process.

In order to provide a motive for an Islamic-related terror attack on American buses, it was reported back on September 30, 2014, that anti-jihad bus ads were pulled in New York City after a request from family of James Foley (see photo below). The CIA-spawned publicity stunt was evidently designed to garner international media attention to both buses and “jihad” just prior to a wave of deadly “revenge” attacks on Greyhound buses.

Greyhound Service from Mexico to Texas
In what appears to be pre-Greyhound terror logistics, it was reported on July 24, 2015, that Greyhound has launched a daily bus service from Texas to Mexico. According to reports, Greyhound is the first U.S.-based intercity bus company to offer the service within Mexico. The company will operate about 20 daily runs from Dallas, Austin, San Antonio and Laredo to Nuevo Laredo and Monterrey. Consequently, 20 buses from Mexico will travel north to Texas, likely bringing with a number of ISIS-inspired terrorists. To celebrate the new service, Greyhound will reportedly offer promotional fares of $1 or 25 pesos, making anyone, terrorists included, able to afford the ride from Mexico to Texas.

ISIS Texas

ISIS Terror Attacks in Texas
In order to create the necessary narrative for ISIS-related terror attack in Texas during JADE HELM 15, it was reported back on April 14, 2015, that Mexican authorities confirmed that an ISIS terrorist camp is only a few miles away from Texas. Less than a month later on May 3, 2015, an ISIS-related attack was executed on the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas. The notion of ISIS-related attacks during JADE HELM 15 was ominously foreshadowed by Daily Show host John Stewart on May 4, 2015, when he stated, “So Texas, it appears that you are on the verge of being taken over by ISIS or the United States of America. So you have a choice to make”. Stewart’s words are rather curious considering that he previously stated that “the United States government already controls Texas”. Three days later on May 6, 2015, the Star published a report entitled “Texas Invasion? U.S. Army Fights ‘Jade Helm’ Conspiracy Theories” which quoted Robert Goldberg, a professor of history at the University of Utah, who stated that JADE HELM 15 may feature “foreign sleepers lying in wait for activation”. The words “foreign sleepers” is evidently a reference to sleeper cells, most likely related to the state-sponsored terror group known as ISIS. In an LA Times report from May 8, 2015, entitled “Operation Jade Helm 15: Military Training Exercise or Martial Law?”, it was reported that “the Army is preparing to wage a ‘holy war’ along the southern Arizona border”, most likely jihadists in nature. Ten days later on May 18, 2015, the New Yorker published a report entitled “Unclear Dangers” which quoted Texas Representative Louie Gohmert who stated that Texas was labeled “hostile” in JADE HELM 15 because it might “be overtaken by foreign radical Islamist elements which have been reported to be just across our border”. Less than a week later on May 24, 2015, actor and Texan Chuck Norris wrote an op-ed in which he stated that “I do believe, in addition to the largest domestic military training, it is also a display of power (near the southern border) intended for deterrence of enemies like ISIS and other terrorists, who the FBI have already said are present in all 50 states”. Less than 2-weeks later on July 4, 2015, the Washington Post published a report which questioned “whether the Army was bringing in Islamic State fighters”. Lastly, in a Russia Today report from July 14, 2015, it was revealed that JADE HELM 15 “simulates operations against Islamic State”, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that the U.S. military will drill for ISIS-related terror attacks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that ISIS-related terror attacks are planned during JADE HELM 15.

Greyhound Bus Terror Timeline
Prior to a high-profile Greyhound bus-related terror attack, the American public must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, Greyhound-related terror is beginning to trend which suggests that a state-sponsored attack on Greyhound-related entities is imminent.

Greyhound Terror Timeline:

1. October 4, 2001: 6 Killed in Greyhound Crash in Tennessee After Passenger Slits Driver’s Throat
2. October 2, 2002: Greyhound bus crashes after driver attacked, 2 riders killed
3. July 31, 2008: Man beheaded on Greyhound bus in Canada
4. March 28, 2012: Shocking Video: Greyhound Bus Bursts Into Flames outside Sacramento
5. December 6, 2013: Man stabs woman on Greyhound bus in Baltimore
6. January 23, 2014: Greyhound bus crashes after attack by hallucinating rider
7. June 20, 2014: Passenger Attacks Greyhound Bus Driver at 70mph
8. July 24, 2015: California man sentenced to 13 years in 2014 Greyhound bus crash in Arizona
9. July 23, 2015: Greyhound faces wrongful death lawsuit in 2008 Colusa crash
10. July 30, 2015: Mother with dead baby on Greyhound Bus charged with murder

[Does not purport to be a complete list of Greyhound attacks]

Harussani Zakaria #fundie malaymail.com

Perak Mufti outraged over CoA decision on out-of-wedlock name

KUALA LUMPUR, July 28 ? Tan Sri Harussani Zakaria was outraged that the Court of Appeal had yesterday rejected a fatwa, and ruled that a child conceived out of wedlock may bear the father's name.

The Perak mufti also cautioned Muslims, saying that Islamic laws still apply and must be obeyed by adherents although they have been rejected by “worldly” laws.

“Islamic laws remain Islamic laws, it is obligatory for all Muslims to obey, although worldly laws have rejected them,” Harussani was quoted saying by Islamist portal Ismaweb.

“What has the court decided? Why is it opposed to the Constitution? It has already been decided by a fatwa, why didn’t the court follow the fatwa ruling?”

Harussani insisted that Islamic laws must be followed, especially when it involves Muslims, because the faith is the religion of the federation.

In 2003, the National Fatwa Committee declared that a child conceived out of wedlock (“Anak Tak Sah Taraf”) cannot carry the name (“tidak boleh dinasabkan”) of the person who claims to be the father of the child, if the child was born less than six months of the marriage.

Yesterday, Justice Datuk Abdul Rahman Sebli reportedly asserted that the National Registration Department (NRD) director-general is a civil officer and that he is bound under civil law, meaning the NRD should have referred to Section 13A (2) of the Births and Deaths Registration Act for any decisions relating to a child's surname.

The ruling could effectively allow all Muslim children born out of wedlock to finally bear their father's name.

In making the court ruling, Justice Abdul Rahman said the NRD director-general is not obligated to apply, let alone to be bound by a fatwa issued by a religious body such as the National Fatwa Committee

In response, pro-Shariah Bill group Ummah was reported by Ismaweb in a separate article as downplaying the decision, saying that the relevant section only applies to surnames and not patronyms.

“The section refers to surname, if available, for families that practise the use of family names. Meanwhile, the practice among Muslims in Malaysia of using ‘bin’ or ‘binti’ with the name of the father may not fall under the Section 13A(2),” said Aminuddin Yahaya, its chief and the deputy president of Islamist group Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (Isma).

The NRD and government have since filed for a leave application to appeal the decision, a move that was welcomed by Aminuddin.

“Considering the legal issue involving lineage has an effect that goes over the administration of Shariah laws at state level, Ummah urges Islamic councils at all states to help untangle the issue by applying to be interveners in the appeal.

“Arguments and input from authoritative religious parties will help the court to give a more holistic decision, for justice’s sake,” he said.

Edward Farrell #fundie rawstory.com

Arizona vice mayor praises Fred Phelps on Facebook with link to satirical Onion obituary

An elected official in Arizona is walking back his praise for the late Rev. Fred Phelps in a Facebook post.

Edward Farrell, vice mayor of Maricopa, posted a satirical obituary Monday morning of Phelps, who founded the virulently anti-LGBT Westboro Baptist Church, published by the fake news site The Onion, along with a comment of his own.

“We need more Fred Phelps in this world. May you rest in peace sir,” Farrell wrote, in response to the piece that satirically credited the pastor as the “man who forever stopped (the) march of gay rights.”

[...]

“No, I’m not kidding!” Farrell replied, according to the Maricopa Monitor. “This world needs to get back to the biblical standards that our God made for us. This guy was not afraid to preach it, and I respect that.”

[...]

Farrell, who was appointed Maricopa’s first mayor in 2003 and has served ever since on City Council, claimed he hadn’t realized the obituary was satirical and was previously unfamiliar with Phelps.

Alabama News Network Staff #sexist #wingnut alabamanews.net

Alabama, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Dakota and Tennessee have filed a motion to intervene in litigation over whether the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) can be slipped into the Constitution more than 40 years after the proposed amendment expired without the support needed to ratify it.

In December 2019, Alabama, Louisiana and South Dakota filed a lawsuit in federal court against the Archivist of the United States — the federal officer who oversees the ratification process for constitutional amendments — seeking to prevent him from illegally adding the long-failed ERA to the U.S. Constitution.

The following month, the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel issued a detailed formal opinion agreeing with Alabama’s principal legal argument that the ERA expired in 1979.

Even so, three states — Illinois, Nevada and Virginia — have now sued the Archivist in federal district court in Washington, D.C., arguing that the ERA should now be ratified. In their view, even though Congress and the states understood in 1972 that the ERA would expire if 38 states did not ratify by 1979, that deadline is unenforceable. And even though five of the states needed to reach 38 changed their minds and rescinded their ratifications, those rescissions do not count.

Alabama, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Dakota and Tennessee are intervening in that case to argue that the deadline for ratifying the ERA has long expired. The intervenor states will also explain why the decisions of the five states that rescinded their ratifications must be given effect.

“In 1972, Congress proposed the ERA to the U.S. Constitution and, critically, imposed a seven-year deadline for the necessary 38 states to approve the amendment,” said Attorney General Marshall. “After a period of intense national debate, the ERA fell eight states short. Only 35 states ratified, and five of those states — Idaho, Kentucky, Nebraska, South Dakota and Tennessee—reconsidered and rescinded their ratifications before the deadline. The seven-year deadline cannot simply be ignored; it was a key part of the bargain between Congress and the states. And states that chose to rescind their ratifications should not be counted when determining whether enough states agreed to alter our Constitution.

“If this constitutional bait-and-switch is successful, there will be dire consequences for the rule of law. The people had seven years to consider the ERA, and they rejected it. To sneak it into the Constitution through this illegal process would undermine the very basis for our constitutional order.

“The practical policy impacts of the ERA’s ratification are no less troubling. While Alabama and its fellow intervenors are firmly committed to equality, the ERA would not promote true equality, but rather a far-left agenda. In some states that have passed their own state-law versions of the ERA, courts have interpreted them to require taxpayers to fund abortions, to invalidate reasonable restrictions on abortion, and mandate that boys be allowed to compete in sports against girls. That is why groups like NARAL Pro-Choice America are pushing the ERA, for in their view, the ERA would guarantee a ‘constitutional right to abortion’ and ‘require judges to strike down anti-abortion laws.’

“There are some states who want to advance these policies, and they are free to do so through lawful political processes. But they are not free to illegally rewrite the Constitution by inserting a provision the American people long ago rejected.

“If activists want a new ERA, they should persuade their fellow Americans that it makes sense, then pass it through Congress and a new state ratification process. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg — a noted proponent of the ERA — recently stated, the ERA cannot be law unless it is ‘put back in the political hopper and we start over again collecting the necessary states to ratify it.’ Any other route would undermine the rule of law upon which we all depend.”

carol1948 #fundie rr-bb.com

I just received an article/report from my SIL that was very informative and explanatory. It explained how the gene pool of Muslims has been very limited ever since Mohammed allowed marriage between first cousins. There were lots of stats, but one of its two main points was the failure of muslims to excel in positive areas for society and their growing numbers in the countries they are migrating to including the U.S. is contributing greatly to the drain on these countries. The article was pressing for these factors to be considered before allowing more muslims into the U.S. Not much chance of that I know. But the article was very interesting.

Maranatha!

Anonymous #fundie washingtonpost.com

SAN DIEGO — The Sunday bulletin of San Diego’s Immaculate Conception Catholic Church on Oct. 16 wasn’t very different from all the others.

Seven pages. A welcome to newcomers. A Mass schedule.

But there, between the prayers of healing for the ill and the deployed and a reminder about a parent-child chastity luncheon for ages 11 and up, was an extra flier.

On it was printed a memo, written in Spanish and English, and titled, in part, “How to vote like a Catholic.”

“It is a mortal sin to vote Democrat . . . immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell,” the flier said, as reported by the San Diego Union-Tribune.

The flier listed five political topics that will guarantee damnation for anyone who endorses them, the newspaper reported.

What are those mortal issues? Abortion, same-sex marriage, euthanasia, human cloning and embryonic stem-cell research.

Warnings from the church, which is in Old Town, the city’s historic district, escalated Oct. 30.

The message that day specifically mentioned Hillary Clinton, linking her to the famed late community organizer Saul David Alinsky, whom it described as a tool of “Satan” and “the devil.”

The Alinsky-Hillary Clinton-Satan connection (as a student at Wellesley, she wrote a thesis on Alinsky, who had a following of young activists in the 1960s and ’70s) is an old conservative rap on Clinton, most recently resurrected by Ben Carson at the Republican National Convention.

That Sunday’s bulletin, which was printed on page 3 and not inserted as a flier, listed 10 key issues through which elected officials “impose sin upon us.”

On that expanded list: accepting immigrants whose “religious values are to eradicate every belief except those of their own prophet and god,” supporting immigrants monetarily while the national debt grows, “playing policeman for the world” and supporting gun control.

A spokesman for the Roman Catholic Diocese of San Diego told the Union-Tribune that the pastor didn’t approve the initial flier.

“For all I know someone thought that they were doing a service” by inserting the message into the bulletin, diocese spokesman Kevin Eckery said. “The pastor said it was not something he had reviewed or approved.”

Eckery said the messages in the flier and bulletin were wrong.

“It’s not a mortal sin to vote for Democrats, number one. And number two, the church doesn’t take positions on this, and we’re not going to.”

jeancommunicates #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Up and until 1960, Islam was not a word understood by average Americans. We had American oil and the Muslim Islamic people were not even considered by the citizens of the USA. We knew nothing about them. Today, we know Islamic Muslims are a problem. They can divide our nation. Divided nations always fall. We understand that Christian Muslims are here because they are killed in their nations for converting from Islam to Christianity. We welcome these people. Some can be here for political asylum and we treasure every human life and they are welcome.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

I Believe The United States is Going To Be Nuked

I feel like the prophet Jeremiah in Jerusalem, preaching the Word of God to a stiffnecked people, just before Babylon attacked and destroyed Israel in 586 BC. I sincerely believe that Russia and China are quietly preparing to attack the United States. We have become so foolish as a nation! The United States has the blood of tens of millions of lives on our hands. Each and every American who has remained silent, and done absolutely nothing to stop abortion, has blood on their hands! Genesis 4:10, “And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground.” Having an abortion does not make a woman unpregnant, it just makes her the mother of a dead child!

Russia is an afflicted country today. They have much to be disgruntled and bitter over, besides the freezing cold. Women outnumber men in Russia, because millions of Russian men have literal drank themselves to death with Vodka! In 2014 the average Russian woman had SEVEN abortions during her lifetime! So Russia is a sinful place, with a massive drug abuse problem, just like the USA. Albeit, thankfully, Gay Pride Parades have been banned in Russia. I never thought I'd desire to move to Russia, but I'd like to live in a decent place where homosexuality is outlawed. Homosexuals are a very real threat to children, which statistics show. Homosexuals are sexual deviates, often seeking to have sex with a male or female, and have little if any moral restraint, evidenced by the repository of pervert Roman Catholic gay priests.

Whether we get nuked or not in America, WE DESERVE IT! This whole gay thing is insane! People have lost their minds. I mean, there are hardly any men's restrooms on Guam anymore! There are “women's restrooms” at McDonald's, and then there are “family restrooms.” There are no longer men's rooms! I have seen no less than a half dozen women walk right into the men's restroom over the past year. American society's degenerative influence affects the territories as well. It is just a matter of time until women's restrooms disappear too, and perverted men walk right into them! Satan is the author of confusion, not God (1st Corinthians 14:33). Youth are deliberately being confused today with the blatant lies of Evolution, to confuse them concerning the truth about God and Creation, as recorded in the Holy Bible. Youth are deliberately being confused today with hundreds of counterfeit English Bible versions, to confuse them concerning the inspired King James Bible. You are deliberately being confused today about their sexual gender, to lure them into the demonic homosexual deathstyle! Youth are targets for Satan today! If the Devil can get 'em young, then he's got 'em for life!

All across the United States today, social networking companies are deleting the account of Christians who speak the truth. This is not liberty. When a tiny handful of mega-corporations buy up and consolidate several dozen media outlets, and then censor the truth, you effectively have a police state and freedom of speech is dead! That is exactly what is happening in America today! Facebook, Google, YouTube, MySpace, Twitter, and other social networking websites have terminated the accounts of truth-tellers!

I just learned today that the Faithful Word Baptist Church in Tempe, Arizona had their bank assets seized by Bank America, for Pastor Steven Anderson's courageous Biblical stand for the truth that homosexuals are perverts, who Biblically were deservedly put to death under Old Testament Mosaic law! Like it or not, that is THE TRUTH! Homosexuality is a perverse deathstyle that needs to be resisted, condemned and outlawed! People with good sense will fully agree! Only a rebellious God-hating society of spiritual degenerates would go against the inspired Word of God, by tolerating sin in any form. The purpose of liberty is the freedom to do RIGHT, not WRONG. When people do WRONG, they lose their RIGHTS! And if a society won't have God as their Ruler, then they will be ruled over by ungodly tyrants! Enacting more laws and lengthening prison sentences won't deter crime, it will only fill up the prisons! America is on a slippery slope into Hell! In response to God's abundant goodness upon America, we have forgotten the Lord (Deuteronomy 6:12).

I get shivers just reading Revelation chapter 18, because the Word of God practically gives the location of the United States! If humanity has proven one thing throughout history, is that mankind always destroys himself! Ecclesiastes 7:29, “Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions.” A nation's people can only shake their fists at God in sinful defiance for so long, before His longsuffering runs out, and then God's wrath and judgment will assuredly come! If the Luciferian elite were eagerly willing to sacrifice the lives of 2,996 Americans on 9/11, do you think they won't murder millions to further the New World Order of the coming Antichrist? God is judging the United States by giving us over to our enemies...

image
Image transcript: Picture of a mushroom cloud, tinted red

various incels #sexist reddit.com

(choosebaseoftwo)
An Incel Next to A Normie: Women lurking, would you give the guy on the right a chance if he had a heart of gold? I know you wont.

image

(WhiteFolder)
Yeah they won't give him a chance, but they know some lucky girl out there would, just not them. *Insert other normie platitudes

(choosebaseoftwo)
Haha. Women. If even one woman on Earth finds a guy to be not attractive, every other female on earth will never find that guy to be attractive either. Women tend to like the same kind of guy, that's why all those posts on LadyBoners are conventionally attractive white men and the very rare non-white guy that every female agrees is attractive.
If even one female says to a guy "you look fine! I'm sure there is a girl out there for you!" it means every woman on earth will think that guy is unattractive too. It's also a sly way women reject men that are ethnic, women are very racist.

(HomoheroBishii)
The roasties are MIA as expected. Even the fat ones would turn a guy who looks like this down. Any woman who marries an ugly man due to his kindness or money will cuck him or have a dead bedroom for life.

(commander_zoidberg)
Gas chamber for both of them i say. Betas of any kind must be purged.

(choosebaseoftwo)
Funny thing is, in 2017, the guy in the middle would get rejected by every female too. Women's standards are extremely high now and they wont date a guy that isnt 8.5/10 nowadays.

.
.
.
What?
I am below average looking because women consider 85% of men to be unattractive so being a 5/10 in looks isnt enough. I am ethnic too so I am below average to all women because of that. I know I have problems and I'm not good enough for any woman because of things I cant change.

(h3rting)
the only arrangement where a woman is genuinely capable of loving her partner to the full extent of her biological female love is when he is significantly more attractive than her , no exceptions

HaifischGeweint #fundie freethoughtblogs.com

For the purposes of relative brevity only, I am limiting the content of this post to HIV/AIDS discrimination in Canada, and will not be addressing the racial component (i.e., which racial groups are at highest risk). It should go without saying that this is already a loaded topic. I’m going to warm this post up by providing you readers with a video link for the trailer of a powerful documentary about the life-long effects of discriminatory North American laws (specifically in the U.S.) on HIV-positive people, before I break down some basic terminology:

HIV Is Not A Crime – A 2011 Documentary by Sean Strub

Relevant Terminology

Now, partly for the purposes of reducing the space it takes to say “living with HIV/AIDS”, and partly as a sign of compassion for those individuals who are thusly described (some of whom are my friends), for the rest of this post, I am going to use the word poz instead. I will be using it like any other adjective, just like how I don’t talk about my friends who are poz any differently than anyone else unless the topic at hand is specifically about social barriers against people who are poz. Previously, one might have said “infected”. But is this person a zombie or a rabid animal? I think we can all afford to be a lot more sensitive, and just use the word poz instead.

Furthermore, on the issue of the term “infection” (and sometimes even its cousin, “transmission”) — some people are born poz, some people became poz relatively unintentionally (i.e., not engaging in high-risk behaviours, such as bare-backing with someone they knew at the time was poz or sharing needles), and some people who became poz at one time now have such a low viral load that it can’t even be detected (let alone transmitted in any way to another individual). It is for sensitivity to all of these people and, really, most people who are poz (and not currently dying from complications of AIDS), that many prefer to speak of becoming converted. Most people who are poz aren’t walking around with such an active and excessively contagious infectious process coursing through their circulatory system that it is in any way appropriate to refer to them as “infected”. And in fact, even for those who are so unfortunate to be dealing with a hyperbolic bloom of the virus in their system, this is usually a temporary state, often associated with the earliest phases in conversion (which can easily go unnoticed for many newly converted) or the final stages of AIDS (in which case, they are unlikely to just be out for a casual stroll like anyone else).

The point is that words like “infected” and “infection”, when talking about people who are poz, carries a connotation of uncleanliness, filth, and/or viral transmission — again, medical intervention has actually advanced to the point that many poz people are no-transmissible or even un-detectable (I’ve seen it with my own eyes while working for a doctor whose only poz patient had been non-transmissible for 13 years and started testing un-detectable). You don’t personally have to agree with this argument, but I do, so I will be referring to people as becoming converted (or at risk thereof) unless I’m quoting a source that uses different language, such as the Supreme Court of Canada.

Finally, a major component of anti-poz stigma is when people look at someone who is poz and perceive of their condition first (as though it were a disease, an infection, or otherwise just icky in socially significant ways) and then perceive of the person in front of them after the fact. Many people will see the fact that This Individual Is Poz as more important (or of a higher priority) than the fact that they are an individual. A human being, not just a body that carries a perceived threat of invisible death and some sort of unseen contagious filth. A person. This attitude of seeing some isolated quality before recognizing the full personhood (or even not being able to see past this isolated undesired quality) of the individual concerned is called essentialism. If you’re already familiar with the role of essentialism in racism, sexism/misogyny, homophobia/transphobia, and ableism, among many other forms of systemic oppression, yes I am talking about the same thing here. Essentialism is the driving principle in anti-poz stigma, but bigotry is the behaviour of application of that principle — the line is razor-thin.

Criminalization Of HIV In Canada

Now that I’ve established the terminology you will be seeing in this blog post and likely elsewhere if you choose to look for resources (especially in gay and queer communities, where I’ve personally seen poz and converted/conversion used most often), I can start talking about the criminalization of HIV. I’ve actually known about a law that exists in Canada now for a few years, whereby if a person who is poz engages in unprotected sex without disclosing their status to their partner, they can be tried and convicted of aggravated sexual assault (i.e., rape). I found out about it because, though he had not converted either of two known casual partners with whom he engaged in unprotected sex, a CFL football player named Trevis Smith was being put on trial and his reputation permanently destroyed for not disclosing his status to his partners. To the best of my knowledge, Smith’s wife has never charged him, presumably because she’s not looking at her husband as some sort of infectious pustule. Other people have been convicted on similar charges under similar circumstances prior to and since Smith faced sentencing that marked him a sex offender, but his particular case was what brought this issue to my attention. I’ll be getting to what the law actually states momentarily.

First, for the record, while I personally very strongly disagree with engaging in unprotected sex without first having an honest conversation about STIs and safer sex (no matter what your status), I can fully empathize with someone who can’t quite get the words out until after the first encounter. This is also simply not the same as lying when a partner enquires. I talk about why that is in this blog post I wrote in May 2011 when I found out that a bunch of my friends-at-the-time, who all still claim to be sex-positive, were apparently sex-positive-unless-you’re-HIV-positive. The short version is I have experience not being able to get the words out soon enough, and though that person continued to see me and not use protection for nearly a year, when we broke up, he threw it back in my face — I’m talking about human papillomavirus, which I was exposed to before the first time I consented to sex as a young adult (take all the time you need to think about that). But what I didn’t mention in that post is that I also have experience being directly lied to about someone else’s STI status, and being directly lied to about someone going to get tested . While I can be compassionate to someone who couldn’t find a way to bring it up (assuming we are speaking of someone who is poz and either non-transmissible or undetectable, or someone who knows their poz status and uses a condom to protect their partner), I cannot stand by someone who lies about their status when asked about it or who (regardless of their status) deliberately avoids getting tested and/or practising safer sex. Full stop.

I firmly believe that the media circus around Trevis Smith, and the existing law around non-disclosure, bolstered already pre-existing widespread stigma and a dangerous avoidance of personal responsibility (that really need not be further exacerbated) on the part of people who can’t rest assured of their status because they won’t get tested for fear that they will test positive for conversion. People already avoid getting tested so that they can keep a false sense of security. I dated multiple such individuals and have talked to countless people who haven’t the faintest idea of how to actually practice safer sex (it’s more than just a fucking condom) or who assume that if their prospective partner doesn’t say anything, it’s because they have nothing to disclose (these are people who are recklessly negligent towards themselves). Criminalizing HIV isn’t going to make it go away, any more than not getting tested will reduce your chances of conversion. So what does Canadian law actually say about HIV?

In 1998, R. v. Cuerrier set the precedent for HIV criminalization in Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled, at the time, that someone who is poz who is engaging in protected or unprotected sex without disclosing their HIV status to their partner, obtained consent under fraudulent circumstances, and therefore has committed an aggravated sexual assault. The default assumption here is that people who are poz are frightening, are rapists, and unsuitable sexual partners for anyone who isn’t poz. Whether or not the sexual partner(s) pressing the charges was/were converted is irrelevant, as is whether or not the person who is poz even has a sufficiently high viral load that they can convert anyone else; and in fact, as in Trevis Smith’s case, Cuerrier’s two partners were not converted. It’s also unclear whether or not the complainant must demonstrate to the court that they were of HIV-negative status prior to the encounter, although in one case, a failure to demonstrate that resulted in an aquittal. Well, the law changed recently. Very recently. Now you can be charged even if you are undetectable or non-transmissible, if you didn’t use a condom. And you can still be charged even if you did use a condom, no matter what your viral load was at the time. Of course, the media spins it as “now you can be HIV-raped without a condom and you won’t even know it! Clutch your pearls!” Here’s the actual statement in the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision two months ago:

[ “This Court, in Cuerrier, established that failure to disclose that one has HIV may constitute fraud vitiating consent to sexual relations under s. 265(3)(c) Cr. C. Because HIV poses a risk of serious bodily harm, the operative offence is one of aggravated sexual assault (s. 273 Cr. C.). To obtain a conviction under ss. 265(3)(c) and 273, the Crown must show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the complainant’s consent to sexual intercourse was vitiated by the accused’s fraud as to his HIV status. The test boils down to two elements: (1) a dishonest act (either falsehoods or failure to disclose HIV status); and (2) deprivation (denying the complainant knowledge which would have caused him or her to refuse sexual relations that exposed him or her to a significant risk of serious bodily harm). Failure to disclose may amount to fraud where the complainant would not have consented had he or she known the accused was HIV-positive, and where sexual contact poses a significant risk of or causes actual serious bodily harm.

[…]

The evidence adduced in this case leads to the conclusion that, as a general matter, a realistic possibility of transmission of HIV is negated if: (i) the accused’s viral load at the time of sexual relations was low and (ii) condom protection was used. This general proposition does not preclude the common law from adapting to future advances in treatment and to circumstances where risk factors other than those considered in this case are at play.” ]

In other words, if you would consent to sex with someone assuming that they are HIV-negative but doing nothing to either rule out the possibility that they are poz or even protect your own sexual wellness (as any responsible sexually active adult should), but your attitude towards that person does a 180 in the event it turns out they are poz, the Supreme Court of Canada will answer you by registering your former sex partner as a sex offender and sentencing them to prison, for up to a maximum of a life sentence. And yet the Supreme Court of Canada just can’t see how this could possibly be abused. Well, the BC Civil Liberties Association can. So can Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network and their coalition of allied organizations, which released this statement on the same day as the Supreme Court’s decision. Because not every person who is poz who dares to have sex with a consenting adult is actively trying to convert HIV-negative people without their consent (again — in that case, I do not stand by his actions and think he should be criminally punished), but the Supreme Court of Canada ruling criminalizes every HIV-positive body in the country; unless, as Michael Vonn says, you freeze and label your used condoms and get signed waivers from all your sex partners indicating that they knew your status before you had sex. Anyone with a bone to pick against a poz sex partner in Canada now has a golden ticket to ruin that person’s life, livelihood, public reputation, and ability to maintain and secure gainful employment, safe housing, or custody of their own children, by dragging them through a guaranteed media circus and criminal court. Race is a significant factor in this, that is already too complex to address even briefly, except to say that the guaranteed majority of people who will be impacted by this are racialized individuals. You can take that to the bank.
Changing The Record

To some people, sex-positivity means sex is a positive thing that you should gleefully embrace at every possible opportunity. If that’s what floats your boat, fine, but sex-negative abstinence “activists” and pro-lifers alike would like nothing more than to paint all sex-positive activists and their ideology thusly. And of course, it is this very slippery misappropriation of the term “sex-positive” that leads the same people who embrace it to recoil in disgust at the audacity of anyone who is poz to have a sex life at all — to say things like “Well if I found out I had sex with someone who was HIV-positive and they only told me afterwards, they may as well have held a gun to my head and raped me, because if I knew they were HIV-positive, I never would have given them my consent.” One of my long-term partners actually posted this online in a discussion led explicitly towards this conclusion by a local self-proclaimed sex-positive activist (who, funny thing, has since used that website and Twitter to repeatedly libel me and multiple others — but especially me, because I’m too poor to hire a lawyer to stop her). I just about barfed on my keyboard when I read the words my so-called friends, allies, and lovers had contributed to this conversation, and when I managed to contain myself, I seriously contemplated spontaneously ending my romantic relationships over it. Amazingly, these are people who rub shoulders with, fuck, and maintain a leather family with at least one person who is terrified to tell anyone too loudly that they have herpes, for fear of being treated like a Pariah. But none of them see the connection.

Sex-positivity is for everybody. It means an approach to sex education that teaches individual people that they have the right to prevent unwanted pregnancies and unwanted sexually transmitted infections, the right to self-respect, the right to say “no, not right now, but maybe later”, and the right to say what they want without fear of being ridiculed or shamed (and to stand up for themselves if they are ridiculed or shamed). It means being aware, up-to-date, and educated about what safer sex means and your individual and general risks of inheriting or transmitting a sexually transmitted infection with any of your sexual partners. For instance, if you aren’t having penile sex, how do you protect yourself (obviously condoms are out) and what is your risk of inheriting or transmitting something like HIV or chlamydia from the different activities you are engaging in? (Hint: enzymes in human saliva eliminate the HIV virus but not chlamydia; some infectious processes such as heat blisters from herpes or aphthous ulcerations from bad oral hygiene or smoking can compromise either your lips or gingiva, increasing your risk of inheriting even infections that your saliva would normally eliminate.) Sex-positivity means not feeling ashamed to be tested regularly for sexually transmitted infections while you’re sexually active (and for a few months after) and even encouraging your primary sexual partner to go with you so you can get tested together (or even immunized where possible and desired, such as for Hepatitis A & B). It also means all sorts of fun stuff like dropping in together at the sex shop down the street from the clinic and picking out a new toy to play with.

Don’t want to be converted? You don’t have to be an anti-poz bigot to reduce your risk of exposure and promote prevention. Both risk-reduction and prevention are critical aspects of sex-positivity. It’s sad that both “sex-positive” activists and the Supreme Court of Canada have left poz people even further marginalized on this issue than they already were. And if you think it’s pretty bleak in Canada but haven’t watched that 8-minute video, I’ve got news for you: it’s so much worse in the states, I might wind up doing a second blog post just about that.


Assuming that someone has nothing to disclose because they didn’t say anything isn’t informed consent. I realize my opinion is going to be unpopular among people who are not poz, but please (everybody). Take some responsibility for what you’re doing with whatever you’re packing between your legs. It’s one thing if you asked and they lied — which I flat-out disagree with and think they should be criminally punished in that case — but it’s another thing entirely when you don’t ask (especially when they used a condom anyway) and then get the person registered as a sex offender because YOU failed to take the same degree of personal responsibility as you secretly expected from them (but only if they were poz, because if they weren’t, then you don’t expect them to take that degree of personal responsibility because you don’t)

THAT’S where the discrimination is taking place here. One standard of behaviour for people who are poz, and another for people who aren’t. Criminal punishment for people who are poz (even with low viral load, non-transmissible status, or undetectable status), but never for people who aren’t. Are people who are poz not entitled to be assured that the person they are about to have sex with is a safe partner, because they’re already poz?

I find this “informed consent” requirement from people who are poz, but not from people who aren’t (because I guess… why… because they have nothing to disclose, and they’re the “victim” here?) motivated by thinking of HIV/AIDS as how the SCC laid it out: threat of bodily harm. Only it’s not that black-and-white. Low viral load, non-transmissible viral load, and even undetectable viral load, do not present threat of bodily harm.


Have you ever had unprotected sex with someone who was not, at the time, a virgin? Congratulations. You’re INFECTEEED with HPV, and your body can now INFECT your future partners with a virus that could kill them with cervical cancer over roughly the same time span in the absence of treatment as untreated HIV typically becomes AIDS and takes a life.

Shouldn’t you be telling all your partners about your status? After all, you’re potentially killing someone by having sex with them.

HPV is even transmitted via skin-to-skin contact, so either one of you wearing a condom doesn’t protect you. And if you think oral sex is your way out, think again. That’s how people get throat cancer from HPV.

CERNology #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

The Frightening Science What They Are Really Doing At CERN

I posted this in the CERN Earthquake thread and thought it might make a good thread of its' own.

First of all to hopefully simplify things for everyone: The Earth operates like a huge DC motor. Our planet, all the weather, the tectonic plates which float on magma and even more that I don't know about is electromagnetic. The magnetosphere receives it's energy from the Sun. We see that power all the time when we see huge storms, thunder, lightning little rain showers, and winds all over the Globe. Not to mention the magnetic ley lines all over the planet that are linked to government classified and occult technology dating back to at least the pyramids.

How do you think respected scientists are able to say that they can use HAARP to create weather anomalies, earthquakes and even some with real understanding say mind control with these atmospheric heaters (a.k.a. HAARP)? It is because our planet and every living thing on it is sensitive to anything screwing around with these EM fields. Our brains function electromagnetically at ELF's (extremely low frequencies) of around 10 Hz.

So at CERN they are taking two streams of lead-ions and releasing them in what they call bunches of trillions of particles with very very short intervals in between bunches.
They are doing this with two streams traveling in opposite directions. So, arguably what they are doing can be thought of as two streams of liquid lead traveling in opposite directions at **near the speed of light**.

Now here is the important point that you and everyone remotely interested in CERN needs to understand. They are propelling these particles at near the speed of light. And Though the thoughts and math change in both of Albert Einstein's General and Special Theories of Relativity, one important thing does not change.

The relativistic mass of each particle gets greater as the velocity increases toward the speed of light. The mass or weight of each particle relative to the observer increases toward infinity as the particle gets nearer and nearer to the velocity of light.

What this means is that the electromagnetic fields needed to just get these super heavy particles at speed is difficult to comprehend. Then you have to consider containing these two rings of liquid lead as they are only increasing in mass or weight as they get faster and faster. It is mind boggling.

Now consider that they were previously colliding protons and they were doing that at an angle. Now, protons weigh almost like nothing when compared to a whole atom of lead. And they were crashing them at an angle. They are colliding these lead ion particles head on and there are a lot more of them and the duration between groups of particles is so short that it almost may as well not be there at all.

So to sum up what is really happening. CERN scientists are misleading people about the amounts of energy being released. Before it was 13 TeV which others have said isn't a lot. Yes that is true but that was for a single collision of a proton at an angle. The reason that there have been physicists issuing warnings and conCERN about what they were planning to do at the LHC is because you have to multiply that 13 TeV by billions and trillions of ANGULAR collisions to understand that it is like trying to contain the energy of one of the Hiroshima or Nagasaki WWII nuclear explosions within a very small space and containing it electromagnetically.

The difference now is the energy releases of single collisions of lead-ions can be described in PeV (Peta Electron Volts). A PeV is 1000 times the energy of a TeV. So the energy projected to be released now is more than 100 times what it was previously published. Plus the collisions were at an angle before and now they are head on. In addition, there are far far more of them and in very very quick succession. Really no interval at all even in terms of time at the atomic level. I would have said in terms of time at the quantum level but time breaks down at the quantum level.

So now instead of billions and trillions of collisions, we are talking about trillions and quadrillions of collisions. I really can't comprehend how they have the technology to even build a machine that can contain these energies especially in light of what Einstein said about these particles getting heavier and heavier towards infinity as velocity increases.

Now I am not a theoretical physicist but I am an engineer and people tell me I am pretty smart. But with the little I do know about what they are doing, the technology they are using to do this must be super top secret Roswell type stuff. What they will not be able to prevent is what these electromagnetic fields that they are using are going to do to the Earth.

They scary part is, these super genius scientists themselves are readily admitting that they don't know what is going to happen. They have built the biggest machine the modern world has ever seen and they have adopted a wait and see attitude?

That's the kind of crap I used to do as 13 or 14 year old kid with gasoline and any other chemicals I could get my hands on! I know this is long and I apologize for that but to top it all off. They are openly occult. They are timing everything to the minute with occult dates and their freaking logo has 666 right there in plain sight.

Almost done Thanks for reading this far. I think I needed to vent!

99.99% of people don't know that the very first website was guess where? CERN. That is even though the Internet was created by DARPA, the first website of all websites operated at CERN of all places. That was 1980. This is a scary amount of long-term planning tied to CERN and the Internet. Final thought. Initially the Internet was awesome and it looked like freedom for ideas and thoughts and generally freedom for all. Now the Internet is the absolute opposite of that and it is the most diabolical scheme for population and mind control the world has ever seen.

Some have longingly said (Nazi evil humans have said) gee whiz if Hitler and the Nazis had only had the Internet.
Well now we have people in control that make make Hitler look like a sweet school girl in comparison.

I don't know what CERN is going to do. It really could be not much that we can physically see. It also could be very horrible. Both possibilities are equal in probability.
Ultimately with or without CERN though, we are heading to an evil end which appears more obvious and more ominous and inevitable with every world news cast each day.

LBB #conspiracy newterrapingazette.com

Reducing the phenomenon of climate change to an event driven by a single factor was inane enough, but then to damn those who oppose futile (but draconian) measures to “correct” the situation is a bizarre distortion and misapplication of faith.

Advances in science reveal causal links between circumstances previously either undetected or considered unrelated. It is not astrology, for example, to be interested in the alignment of the sun and planets as they cycle predictably from conjunction to conjunction. The history of the sun’s behavior is now being studied more thoroughly, and it does display cycles that matter to humanity. Cosmic rays not produced within the solar system play a very important role in the Earth’s weather. It is no longer nonsense to ask, “What is the relationship between solar activity and earthquakes and vulcanism?”

The science is too complex to be summarized here, but you can begin to see the outlines of the matter if you watch carefully the video linked above. Don’t be put off by facts that are new to you, no matter how surprising they might appear; this is a new cooperative interpretation of reality, and its unfolding will be both a revelation and a shock.

Finally, this bears repeating, unfortunately: when the Gore-Hansen Cult blames catastrophic climate change on human activity, it comes down firmly in the camp occupied by religious fanatics who blamed crop failures on witchcraft. “If we were fastidiously correct Christians, the corn* would not have failed” is seldom heard these days, though of course some nutcases like Jerry Falwell blamed the Islamofascist attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and (an unknown location in, presumably,) Washington DC on homosexuality and other behaviors denounced by the Old Testament.

Unfortunately few observers have remarked on the obvious religious nature of the Warmers’ critique; after all, the screed of their cult begins with human hubris and misdeeds, claims those sins produce utterly fantastic results, predicts catastrophe for generations yet unborn, and demands immediate reform and pietistic obedience to inerrant authority. The cult is Biblical in its self-assurance. Any belief system so constructed should bear a heavy burden of proof before it hijacks governmental power.

Of course the dispute continues, but note, please, that it is now fueled by the (simple, but irrelevant) fact that industry produces many tons of carbon dioxide each year. The statistic not mentioned is that the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere is small, and humanity’s contribution of the gas is a minuscule amount of the total. Nor is it noted that CO2 has a logarithmic effect as a greenhouse gas, becoming less influential per additional unit of the chemical as its volume in the atmosphere increases. Finally, the fact is that while humanity currently struggles along with just over 400 parts per million of carbon dioxide in the air, everyone would benefit if that figure could be raised to 600 ppm. You know why that is true because you read this newsletter — but most people would be horrified by the claim that more CO2 in the air is an excellent idea.

No student of history can truthfully deny that religion can be extremely dangerous. What everyone needs to understand now is that climate alarmism is an inappropriate amalgam of religious prophesy, piety, and persecution.

Further, the concept of anthropogenic global warming is not science. It is not logical, nor is it supported by facts. Its believers intend to subsume the political power of governments in order to impose irrational regulations on people who cannot be expected to have access to, or an understanding of, the facts of the matter.

Sikrikim #fundie dailymail.co.uk

An ultra-orthodox Jewish sect trashed a Jerusalem ice cream parlour because they were disgusted by people licking cones in public believing it promotes promiscuity.
The owners of the Zisalek parlour in the Mea Shearim neighbourhood had put up posters asking people not to consume the snacks in public and installed separate entrances for men and women.
But religious zealots from the ultra strict Sikrikim sect did not believe the measures went far enough and broke in during the night to vandalise the premises.
Owner Guy Ammar said: 'They had a real ball with us.
'But we were not deterred. Residents here told us not to give up and business is going well now.'
The Sikrikim are named after a Jewish group which 2,000 years ago fought against Roman rulers and suspected Jewish collaborators.
They wear masks to hide their identity and strike mainly at night.
Ultra-Orthodox Jews make up about 8 percent of Israel's 7.7 million population. With an average of eight children per family, they are a fast-growing population.
Many live below the poverty line and tend keep to their own towns and neighbourhoods.
Mea Shearim area is small, less than half a square mile, and home to about 30,000 residents considered among the most tight-knit and reclusive of Israel's ultra-Orthodox Jews.
Other stores in the neighbourhood, where men wear traditional black garb and women bare little but their face, have had their windows broken, locks glued and foul-smelling liquid smeared on walls.
Marlene Samuels, manager of the nearby Or Hachaim bookshop said: 'They also threw once a bag of excrement inside and smashed our windows three times.'
Marlene's shop has been attacked more than 10 times since it opened a year and a half ago, Samuels said. The latest assault was last week when one of the store's branches had its locks glued overnight.
The shop's owner met with the Sikrikim several times.
Although the store stocks only religious books, they include volumes published by Zionist organsiations while the Sikrikim believe a Jewish state can be established only with the coming of the Messiah.
Sikrikim attacks have also been reported at Beit Shemesh, a mixed secular and religious town with a growing ultra-Orthodox community, about half an hour's drive from Jerusalem. The latest target there has been a religious girls' school.
The Sikrikim who reside near the school object to the way the girls dress. Since the school year began in September they have regularly picketed outside shouting out at the students, most of them younger than 12, that they are promiscuous.
'They claim to be religious but what they do is a crime against God, against the Torah and against humanity,' said David Rotenberg, who works at Or Hachaim.

IAmJoseph #fundie freeratio.org

There is an even more mysterious factor here. When one considers the abnOrmal freezing of water - namely it stops turning to ice at -4, allowing all fish to live - means there is a hovering control here. This denies ToE's adaptation, because clearly, the fish have no input here - they are not adapting, but are subject to a hovering control factor!

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesus-is-savior.com

The American dream died a long time ago for most people. In the early 20th century, the United States was truly the land of opportunity, but along came the spider (known as the Federal Reserve, started in 1913) which has literally bankrupt our nation since the 1930's, created two major World Wars (which murdered several tens of millions of innocent people), and today is still running our country into the ground through massive reckless government debt-spending. WAR IS PROFIT!

Deindustrialization (aka, “globalism,” the elimination of U.S. jobs to foreign nations) has ruined our nation's economy, leaving tens of millions of Americans unemployed or underemployed, without their homes, without medical insurance, destitute without hope). These are the “fruits” of the greedy, evil, Luciferian elite, who run the banking system and ruthlessly control the White House. Their secret agenda is a New World Order (NWO), or as retired Navy commander William Guy Carr (1895-1959) called it in his excellent book, “PAWNS IN THE GAME”... a “Godless Global Totalitarian Communist Police State!” Yes Sir! That's why Americans are subject today to TSA sticking their hands all over your body at airports, violating your person in the name of keeping you “safe.” What TSA does to U.S. citizens is punishable by a decade in prison, if they were to be held to the same laws as the average citizen. Yet the dystopian government can do what they want, violating people's rights continually, conditioning the public to embrace a coming Police State!

I've never seen people so messed up as they are today. Everywhere we turn nowadays, people are covered in body markings, tattoos. I went to get a cheeseburger last night, and the waitress' left arm was completely tattooed. I felt sorry for her! I am always very kind and sweet to people, expressing God's unconditional love, and I insincerely try hard to make EVERYONE feel loved.

Weston404, various incels #sexist #racist #conspiracy incels.co

[Experiment] Is 1st world feminism actually Jewish hypercapitalism rather than "muh socialism"?

Factors that you should consider:

Feminism is against the patriarchy, yet office sloots would not complain if they have to suck off a Jewish boss, or get raped by Harvey Weinstein for an acting role.

Many of the vocal, and also viral feminists are middle class Caucasian women who have never experienced poverty or crime in their liberal gated communities.

If "women of colour" are at the forefront, they are funded by mostly Jewish capitalists and companies, acting in solidarity with the Caucasian feminists.
If feminism was "socialist", why are sub8 men automatically disqualified from dating, as the feminist womyn acts like the hypercapitalist Jew and only seeks the top 0.01% of men?

Back home in Mexico, when it was under a soft version of "muh socialism", short, balding and fat drunk amigos had no difficulty marrying their looksmatch by age 20. Nowadays, their looksmatch would be on a dating app demanding 7ft + tall basketball players because of the fucking scheming, hook-nosed and rat faced Jew!

Poll: Is feminism a product of Jewish hypercapitalism rather than "muh socialism"?

Yes - 18 votes/52.9%Tempus Edax Rerum, Fakeceller, RandomGuy, anon, PoodankMcGee, Atavistic Autist, PotatoTomato, Legionarivs, Uther, Insomniac, IamLost, ManletHalfCurry, Darth Cialis, XerxesAzrael, Transcended Trucel, Toadman, black_depresso, CameronCel, RemoveNormalfags
No - 2 votes/5.9%Robtical, Mainländer
Why the Jews - 2 votes/5.9%Gyros_Pretcel, yeshuallah
Feminism is a shit test, but it’s a Jewish influence - 3 votes/8.8%aquilinenosecell, Blackpill Rage, NoCopeNoHope
AWALT - 9 votes/26.5%Sadness, Murdoch89, happiless, D3X, littlemanhikicel, Neggr, Shigechi, sub8male, HonklerTheConqueror, BOB

fschmidt #psycho reddit.com

Why I support abortion, LGBTQ rights, and prostitution

Abortion is the killing of fetuses who have a genetic predisposition to become liberals. What can be better than that? So abortion is eugenic because it selects against degenerate liberal genes, and conversely banning abortion is dysgenic because it saves liberal genes. Edward Dutton argued that this why Ireland became a liberal cesspool so quickly. So in a sense Christianity is partly responsible for the liberal plague because it banned abortion. On the other hand, the Old Testament says nothing against abortion and Exodus 21:22-25 can be interpreted to defend abortion.

The best way to get rid of the LGBTQ alphabet soup of sexual perverts is to simply give them the right to be perverts. Their own perversions will prevent them from reproducing, and so giving them the right to do this is eugenic because it selects them out of the gene pool. Conversely banning such perversions forces these perverts to pretend to be normal, and this causes them to reproduce and therefore banning such perversions is dysgenic. Once again Christianity is at fault here for banning these perversions. This caused pervert genes to increase until they reached critical mass, which we see today. In a healthy society, there will always be a small number of perverts, and allowing them to be perverts will keep pervert genes at a low level. Once again the Old Testament supports my position. The two Leviticus passages commonly used to punish homosexuality are actually just mistranslations from Hebrew. In the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, the big sin is abusing visitors. But the story makes clear that when sexual perversion is widespread, a society is doomed, which I agree with. This is why it is critical to allow natural selection to select against perverts by supporting LGBTQ rights.

Prostitution is required to protect the chastity of other women. The importance of general female chastity should be obvious to any sane person, but to repeat the point, sluts cause dysgenic Fisherian selection as I explained here. Therefore it is critical to prevent women from becoming sluts, and the way to do this is to provide prostitution as an outlet for excess male sexual desire. Without prostitution, men will pursue all women turning single women into sluts and married women into adulteresses. So banning prostitution promotes sluts and adultery, and so is horribly dysgenic. Christianity has always considered prostitution a sin but at least the early Christians were sensible on the subject. Saint Augustine said "Remove prostitutes from human affairs, and you will destroy everything with lust." And Thomas Aquinas repeated this quote, showing that the Catholic Church still had sense in the Middle Ages. But crazy modern Christianity supported banning prostitution which undermines Christian morality. The Old Testament takes the right position and supports prostitution for the right reason. Proverbs 6:26 says "For a prostitute’s fee is only a loaf of bread, but an adulteress goes after a precious life." This makes clear that prostitution is the way to prevent adultery.

I follow the Old Testament because it is the most eugenic book ever written. Praise Yehovah, god of the Old Testament.

TheAxis #racist stormfront.org

You are 100% correct. They are too ignorant to understand that ALL public utilities, and the entire infrastructure needs to be maintained. Once whites leave, the maintenance does not happen and everything that is worth a cent will be removed and sold as scrap. Every time the peace corps build a public well, or latrines in Africa (to benefit the local indigenous species) the minute the peace corps leaves everything is dismantled and sold as scrap. 'Future' is not a word the negro understands, thus whites should not have to provide a 'future' for them.

Adam Hobbes #fundie reaxxion.com

“The uncontested absurdities of today are the accepted slogans of tomorrow. They come to be accepted by degrees, by precedent, by implication, by erosion, by default, by dint of constant pressure on one side and constant retreat on the other—until the day when they are suddenly declared to be the country’s official ideology.”

-Ayn Rand

The public debut of “Caitlyn” Jenner represents a watershed moment for American culture. Though most have not realized it, Jenner’s coming out party constitutes a significant “trial balloon” on the part of the progressive left and the media. It is an attempt to cash in on years of carefully managed stories on transgender “discrimination,” sympathetic portrayals of transgender characters in entertainment, and the generally successful campaign of the gay rights movement and social justice activists.

The goal is simple: normalize transgenderism to such an extent that any criticism of the concept or its practitioners will not be tolerated.

They must not be allowed to succeed. Whether the silent majority of Americans realize it or not, the transgender issue represents the last best opportunity to turn the tide in the culture wars. Make no mistake: the progressives are winning. Twenty years ago a person could openly criticize homosexuality. Today, thanks to the Supreme Court, people who do not enthusiastically endorse gay marriage are branded as bigots, disqualified from high-profile business positions, and generally dismissed as ignorant hicks whose views are outside of the scope of acceptable thought.

Media outlets have already taken sides and are branding people as being “transphobic” for not accepting the idea that Bruce Jenner is now a female. It is now “bigoted” to refer to Bruce as a “he.” Even so much as joking about Jenner is verboten. The media is rallying around him, protecting him, in spite of the fact that his refusal to get sex reassignment surgery, his sexual preference for women, and his recently having killed someone in a car accident all make him a very poor candidate as the face of transgenderism.

Nevertheless, they have made him the poster boy, hoping that everyday TV watchers won’t sweat the details and that the popularity of the Kardashians will keep him relevant. The next steps include some Will and Grace style sitcom to make transgenders seem more hip and fun, adoption by the Democratic Party as the next great civil rights issue, and finally a sustained campaign of legal and private ideological bullying until transgender acceptance is the new normal.


"The Line In The Sand"

Why must we draw the line at transgenderism? I argue that legitimization of transgenderism would constitute a cultural sea change. It would be the first time the cultural fascists had succeeded in enforcing genuine doublethink. Leftist ideology regarding transgenderism not only contradicts existing progressive doctrines (feminism), but is also literally false. You are being ordered to believe in a fairy tale—the idea that a dog can transform into a cat if it just wishes for it hard enough—and this is where the danger lies.

To be clear, I do not argue that we need to persecute or hate transgenders: people have the right to choose to play dress up and freely associate with others who indulge their delusions. What we need to protect is our right to disapprove of their behavior and reject their “science.” We must dig our heels in and fight. One is reminded of Picard’s words on the Borg in First Contact:

“We’ve made too many compromises already, too many retreats. They invade our space and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds and we fall back. Not again! The line must be drawn here! This far, no farther!”: might as well be GamerGate’s slogan.

Of course, in the film Jean-Luc eventually agrees with Lily, though this does not refute his point about the Borg. He is right when he says that repeated compromise and surrender will not work. As in any war, the longer good men wait to fight back, the more difficult it is to overcome a metastasizing and emboldened evil.

The progressives have been encouraged by traditional Americans’ reluctance to fight back due to a mixture of indifference, moral cowardice, and bemusement. They are strengthened by the tendency of mainstream society to not take them seriously, to say “Who cares about Bruce Jenner and the reality TV sideshow!”, and to think that the goodwill and tolerance extended toward progressives will be returned.

This last point is crucial when we consider the history of previous civil rights causes. Earlier progressive campaigns pertaining to issues such as women’s lib, gay rights, and miscegenation had decent libertarian justifications and did not seek to impose much on society save tolerance of alternative life choices. (Social conservatives would likely argue that there were other negative consequences.)

Transgenderism, by contrast, imposes a great deal on American society. It requires us to revisit all questions of sex segregation, everywhere from schools to sports leagues to bathrooms. And note that this is all demanded based on the softer concept, “gender,” as transgenders have all but stopped using the term “transsexual.” They understand that with current technology, sex is immutable.

Since gender is supposedly just about feelings instead of biology, transgender logic would allow any man to claim he is a woman and waltz into a women’s locker room. There is no requirement that he pass for a female, nor is there a requirement that his “feeling” be permanent.


"The Real Danger"

The biggest problem with the transgender agenda is that it erodes our right to our own minds and to our perceptions of reality. A man is not a woman merely because he believes he is one, yet the progressives would have us believe so on pain of social ostracism, loss of employment, and discrimination lawsuits. If we give progressives the right to redefine reality, then we are no better off than Winston in 1984 when he was tortured for refusing to say that 2 and 2 equal 5 (or to continue the Star Trek references, Picard when he was tortured by the Cardassians for refusing to pretend there were five lights. And isn’t it weird that “Cardassian” sounds like “Kardashian?”)

What argument could there possibly be against polygamy, pedophilia, zoophilia, or any range of (currently) unacceptable behaviors? If the legal criteria for a thing’s identity is mere belief on the part of the subject, why shouldn’t a child be allowed to have a romantic relationship with an adult if he believes himself to be an adult as well?

Children are too young to make that choice you say? Then why are there transgender children? Surely you can’t argue that a small child ought to be able to take hormones and change their gender (a decision that will have a massive impact on the rest of their lives), yet cannot consent to sex. If feelings are good enough in one case, then why not the other?

We are not only legitimizing a subculture that will invite massive legal headache and mischief upon our society, we are also establishing a criteria for said legitimacy that is so patently irrational and dangerous as to ensure an endless queue of additional subcultures will come forward seeking the same affirmation from society.

It is perhaps ironic that it is the traditionalists and conservatives that are arguing that there is more to being a woman than copying stereotypical gender norms and looking the part. To say that Bruce Jenner is a woman after a bit of surgery and makeup is degrading to the idea of womanhood. The case of Rachel Dolezal shows that black people are not especially tolerant of whites identifying as black merely because they “feel” they are. Yet there is no strong argument against transracialism if we accept transgenderism.

Given the example of Dolezal, women should be just as insulted at the pretense of someone like Bruce Jenner. Lacking the biology and differing treatment from society that comes from actually being a woman, his claim that he “has always felt like a woman” is absurd on its face. What he really feels is a compulsive desire to play dress up: to make manifest a fetishized ideal of femininity brought about by his own psychological insecurities and a “grass is always greener” presumption about life as a woman.

Transgender people suffer from a pervasive mental illness, and as a result they deserve our sympathy. There is no reason to be violent or mean toward them. Still, we should not be expected to affirm their neuroses anymore than we should affirm the beliefs of a schizophrenic who believes himself to be an alien.

The time for compromise is over. Do not apologize for “misgendering” them, do not feel bad for calling him “Bruce,” do not be afraid to make jokes about them (they say worse things about whites and Christians), and do not ever apologize for rejecting their unscientific hogwash. This noisy .001% of the population is sick and should not be allowed to dictate to the rest of us. When they tell you to move, plant yourself like a tree by the river of truth and tell them: no. You move.

Citizen of Gotham #conspiracy citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com

(I can't can't even begin.... )

Gematria: COG - World's Oldest Panda Jia Jai Dies (Obama's Assassination Embedded) [13/31, 17/71, 19/91, 23/32, 26/62, 27/72, 35/53, 49/94, 56/65]
October 18, 2016
Gematria: COG - World's Oldest Panda Jia Jai Dies (Obama's Assassination Embedded)
[13/31, 17/71, 19/91, 23/32, 26/62, 27/72, 35/53, 49/94, 56/65]

CNN's video is 1:11 in duration.

111 is like Black Alien, Encoded, Biased, Die Hard, Bad Seed, and Cocaine in Jewish Gematria
111 is like Democrat Obama, Mark of Beast, Witchcraft, New York, Image of Satan, Satan’s Seal, Satan’s Hell, Wicked Will, Lucifer Hell, Illusion, Dark Matter, Sarah L Palin & Papa Smurf in Simple Gematria
111 (SG) AFFINITY with 666 (EG):
Mark of Beast, Evil Sarah P, Evil Sarah P, Sarah Fed I D Chip, Plan Of Sarah, Sarah P A Beast, Lady of Evil, Leader of Alaska, New York, Monsanto, Witchcraft, Ebola Vaccines, Santa Claus, Image of Satan, Fire is Anger, Son of Sin, E Identity, Lucifer Hell, Hardened Heart, Receive a Mark, Wicked Will, Helicopter, Democrat Obama, God Incarnate, Lustful, Commercials, Demonic Evil, Allah is Lord, Pictures, Grand Rapids, Hell Burns, Providence, One Christ, Talking Heads, Devil Dragon, Open Chakras, Knighthood, Corrupt, Ejaculation, The KKK Leader, American Beast, Anarchy USA, Demon Inside, Illusion, Dark Matter, Dollar Sign, Teleport, Gray Aliens, The Archons, No More Cash, The Dragons, Horned Beast, End Times Deal, Forehead Sign, Birth C is Fake, & Mahdi Barack H Obama in Simple Gematria

10/16/2016 - same day of DEATH like the Sacrifice of Trinity Gay
http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2016/10/gematria-cog-us-sprinter-tyson-gays.html

Born in 1978 in the wild in Sichuan, China, Jia Jia was given to Hong Kong in 1999 to mark the semi-autonomous city’s handover by Britain two years earlier.The death of Jia Jia, whose age in human terms was more than 100 years, was announced by the Hong Kong theme park where she lived.The park said that in the last two weeks, Jia Jia’s daily food intake had dropped from over 10kg to less than 3kg per day, and she had lost weight.Pandas normally live to around 20 years of age in the wild, and 25 in captivity.Ocean Park (She was put down by vets) Jia Jia’s home since 1999In recent weeks Jia Jia’s food consumption had sharply declined from over bkg (22 pounds) to less than three kg (six pounds) per day and her average weight dropped from 71kg (156 pounds) to around 67kg (147 pounds).

Dubbed the “Grandma panda,” and the equivalent of 114-years-old in human terms, Jia Jia had reportedly been suffering from multiple geriatric diseases including high blood pressure, arthritis and cataracts on both eye.

10+26+20+16=72 like Dr. Paolo Martelli (director for veterinary service at Ocean Park) in the English Reduction system

72 is like Balance & Dead Again in Jewish Gematria
72 is like DEC in English Gematria
72 is like Money, Bird Flu, Marriage, Rocket, Magnetic, Reborn, Himself, Hitler, Mea Culpa, Sadist, Mohammed, Accurate, & Chickens in Simple Gematria

10+26+16=52

52 is like Pope & Ordo [order] in Simple Gematria
52 is like NWO, Devil, & Six in English Gematria

1+2+6+2+1+6=18 like Games (like the Olympics ones Tyson Gay competed in) & Love (word on Trinity's cell-phone case) in the English Reduction System

18 is like Barack , Masons, Shots, & Kills in Pythagorean Gematria
18 is like Big, Head, Die, Gala, Face, Aide, & Big 10 in Jewish Gematria
18 is like Barack = 2+1+9+1+3+2=18

1+2+6+1+6=16

16 is like Guns in Pythagorean Gematria
16 is like Cage in Jewish Gematria & Deaf in Simple Gematria

290(th day of 2016)} 29 or 2+9=11

29 is like Black, Became, Held, A Lamb, Bind, Gang, & Hedge in Simple Gematria
29 is like Handgun in Pythagorean Gematria
29 breaks down to the number 11, a Master Number in Satanic Freemasonry
29 represents Relationships, Teamwork, Compassion, Companionship, & Diplomacy in Numerology
11 is a Master # and means Sin, Transgression & Peril in Satanic Freemasonry

76 (days remaining in 2016)

76 is like Amen, Mean, Bold, Face God, Choke, Bible Eagle, I am Black, Dog Face, Name, & Go Ahead in Jewish Gematria:
76 is like Barack H Obama, Master, Bad People, DNA Changes, Humans, Human DNA, Despicable, Contact, Contain, Dirty, Bible Codes, Revenge, & Victim in Simple Gematria

Sunday (day of death for Jia Jia & Trinity Gay) like Bamboo (food of Jia Jia & An An) like “Oldest” in the English Reduction system equals 21

21 signifies the Devil (Sacred # 7 multiplied by the Sacred/Perfect # 3)
21 is like Be Dead in Jewish Gematria
21 is like Led, & Edge in Simple Gematria

October like Neck (area of body that Trinity Gay was "shot" in) in the English Reduction system equals 33

33 is the Magic #, Teacher #, Master # in Satanic Freemasonry; also the 33 vertebrate in one’s spine
33 is like Magic & LAPD in Simple Gematria
33 is like A Seal Of Satan, Handgun, Gunshots, Orange, Diamond, Marine, Federal, Police, Nazis, KKK } K (11) K (11) K (11), Coeptis [cœptis], Holocaust, Order, Masonry, False Flag, Teacher, Secrecy, October, Delaware, Left Eye, Mean, Believe, Beyonce, Indian, Sixteen, & Race War in Pythagorean Gematria
Ninety & Sixty ONLY two numbers that have a Gematria of 33 in Pythagorean Gematria
U (3) K (11 w/"v" exception} U=3x11=33
Christopher Columbus’s initials } CC = 33
Delaware (3rd State) sums to 33 in Pythagorean Gematria
Oregon is the 33rd State
Massachusetts (6th), and Hawaii (50) in Pythagorean Gematria (only 3 said States sum to said #)
The 33rd day (Groundhog Day) in the calendar is February 2nd
Thirty-three sums to 156 in Simple Gematria
156 is like I Am an Alien, Kings, Berlin, False Flag, Fracking, Grimm, Code Nine, Real Magic, The Game, Taken, ROFL, Childhood, Grip, Chose, & Achilles in Jewish Gematria
156 is like God, Flag, Game, Heal, Drac, Mega, Hide, & Data in English Gematria
156 is like The Grey Alien Race, Tall Gray Aliens, The Demonic Aliens, Eater of Souls, Occult Gateway, The Fifth Element, The Reptilians, Francois Hollande, Battle Of Midway, Final Curtain Call, July Fourth, America’s Birthday, Thirty-three, As Above So Below, February Second, Six Six Six, Devil’s Creation, Metatron’s Cube, Twenty-eight, Brilliant Minds, The Number of Man, Calvary Cross,Messiah Gateway, Maniac Conned Icons, Nine Seven Eight, God Saves Israel, Biblical Prophecy, Lord Of The Sabbath, Baltimore News, The Seventh Day, Barack Obama Agreement, The Beast Barack H Obama, Great Deceiver B Obama, The New Age Barack Obama, Obama’s Request, Barack H Obama Miracles, The Wicked Barack Obama, Barry Sotero, Obamas Power Is, December Eighteenth, & Gematria Gateway in Simple Gematria

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org


JAY AND HILLARY ROCKEFELLER ENGINEERED 9/11

"And there shall be upon every high mountain, and upon every high hill, rivers and
streams of waters in the day of the great slaughter, when the towers fall"
(Isaiah 30: 25).

The nightmarish 8-years that the Clintons spent in the White House were just the precursor for something far, far worse to come in the future. Hillary did not like her position as co-President . . . so she was planning on running for the Presidency in 2008. Even if she ran the White House behind the scenes, the wife of an ex-President is not considered fully qualified to replace her husband in that position. Additionally, the Constitution makes no provision for a SHE in that exalted position.

1999, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan was the senior senator from New York and Charles "Chuck" was the junior senator.

Senator Moynihan was a 3rd term senator but he decided not to run for an almost guaranteed 4th term.

There were many contenders for the vacant Senate seat . . . especially Hillary Clinton Rockefeller.

To catapult her into the White House in 2008, Hillary decided to move home to New York, and obtain the vacant Senate seat from there. Unfortunately, there were many other candidates who had a much better chance of filling Senator Moynihan's vacant seat.

One such candidate was John F. Kennedy Jr....His name alone was enough to open any door to any position in the government:

In the end, John was still convinced his best shot was at running for Moynihan Senate seat. Hillary Clinton had hesitated to enter the race largely because she feared John, who was being touted behind the scenes as her principal rival for the nomination, would be a formidable foe. John was heir both to the Kennedy magic and People's "Sexiest Man Alive", as well as the consummate New Yorker, a resident of the city since the age of three. Although New York had no residency requirements, Hillary, who had never spent more than a few days at a time in New York, would be branded as a carpetbagger. (Andersen, The Good Son, p. 320).

JFK Jr. was in a perfect position to fill the vacant Senate seat and from there he would have been a very viable Presidential candidate in 2008.

John F. Kennedy Jr., son of the assassinated President, was a lawyer, journalist, and editor of a very popular magazine named George.

He was also an international celebrity and had just obtained his pilot's licence.

In 1996, Kennedy married a beautiful woman named Carolyn Jeanne Bessette.

On July 16, 1999, John F, Kennedy Jr., his wife Carolyn, and her older sister Lauren where all killed in a "plane crash" off Martha's Vineyard. The official explanation was the crash was due to adverse weather conditions at that time.

The bodies were recovered from the ocean floor by Navy divers and taken by motorcade to the county medical examiner's office, where autopsies revealed that the crash victims had died upon impact. JFK Jr. was cremated . . . and then his ashes were scattered over the very spot where his assassination took place.

The next serious opposition to Hillary replacing Senator Moynihan was the mayor of New York City named Rudy Juliani.

Mayor Rudy Juliani was Hillary's next potential rival for the vacant Senate seat.

Just as he began to campaign, he developed "pancreatic cancer" and he was involved in an affair with another women.

With both rivals out of the way, Hillary chose a politician named Enrico "Rick" Lazio to run against her!!

U.S. elections are actually decided by debates, and who gives the best performance on TV. Besides voter fraud, Richard Nixon lost the 1960 election to JFK because JFK looked more telegenic to the female voters.

The race between Lazio and Hillary Clinton became the most expensive Senate campaign ever conducted at the time. In a September 13, 2000 debate, Lazio left his podium and asked Clinton to sign a document affirming a pledge to abstain from benefiting from “soft money.”

The Senate race was decided by a debate between Hillary and Rick Lazio.

Lazio was confrontational, and demanded that Hillary sign a document right then and there. The female voters viewed Lazio as a male chauvinist bully and voted en masse for Hillary.

All Trump has to do is demand that Hillary sign a paper stating that she is medically fit to become President!!

Lazio was specifically chosen to THROW the Senate race by acting foolishly and making Hillary look like a victim of political persecution. That "controlled opposition", and Rockefeller money, worked wonders because Hillary won the Senate race. After Hillary became Senator, Lazio was well rewarded financially for his perfidy.

With her hand on the Bible, Hillary Rockefeller was sworn in as a United States Senator by Vice President Al Gore in the Old Senate Chamber, as President Clinton and Chelsea Clinton look on, January 3, 2001.

Remarkably, the most powerful man in the U.S. Senate at that time was Hillary's uncle "Jay."

Billionaire Jay represented the poor coal miners of West Virginia!!

What a coincidence that the most powerful man in the U.S. Senate was John Davison "Jay" Rockefeller IV. In Europe, whenever anybody has a numeral after their name, they are considered ROYALTY and treated with deference. During the Great Depression, the Rockefellers also bought the bankrupt state of West Virginia and "Jay" used it as a springboard to the U.S. Senate.

As head of the Senate "Intelligence" Committee, Jay was the boss of the Pentagon, plus the CIA, FBI, and all the other departments of the government.
9/11 was all about conquering Iraq, Syria, and Crimea before Hillary became President in 2008!!

Uncle Jay assured Hillary that she could run as a "peace candidate" in 2008 if the Pentagon could get their "mission accomplished" before that date. That was the reason for the Pearl Harbor type 9/11 false flag operation.

The Twin Towers were built by a "Mickey Mouse" construction company named the Karl Koch Erecting Company.

Their bid for the job was $20 million, whereas U.S. and Bethlehem Steel's bid was about $120 million.

Of course, the buildings were not meant to stay up very long as they were competition for 30 Rockefeller Plaza.

The Twin Towers were built like BIRDCAGES with absolutely no reinforcements in the center. Here is a quote from Karl Koch III, President of the company:

That weekend, I visited my father at Sands Point. He said he had seen the Trade Center, and that from the outside, it looked as though we had done a good job. "But Karl," he said, "there's no steel in that building."
"There's a lot of steel in that job, Pop," I said. "Two hundred thousand tons."
"I didn't see any steel," he said.
"The whole wall is steel," I said. "It's like a birdcage."
Dad stared into my eyes. It wasn't the wall he was talking about; it was the floors. "It's wide open," he said. "Is every floor like that? What's going to hold that building up?"
"The floor paneling system," I explained. "That gives the outer wall its lateral support. It's the modern way of building skyscrapers."Dad shook his head. "The design is bad," he said. "It isn't strong. There should be steel columns across the whole floor to keep those ceilings up. Where are the beams and columns?"
"They're spanning the open floor area with trusses, Pop. It's a new, modern design" (Koch, Men of Steel, pp. 338-339).

Those 2 buildings were just temporary until Rockefeller was ready for his Pearl Harbor II.

The Twin Towers were demolished by explosives and a small nuclear weapon hidden in the basement.

It was Pearl Harbor II, with the Pentagon providing a convenient excuse to invade, Iraq, Syria, and Crimea.

The birdcage construction of the Twin Towers made them very easy to demolish. Old buildings are usually demolished by explosives perfectly timed to prevent damage to surrounding buildings.

Another reason for 9/11 was to get rid of a fearless reporter named Barbara Olsen.

Barbara Olsen (a last days Deborah) was a lawyer and well known TV personality.

She was the bane of Hillary, as she just published a damning expose entitled Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Hillary hated the very ground she walked on and demanded that she be killed in a "plane crash" on 9/11.

Barbara Olsen was a fearless critic of Hillary Rockefeller and she was #1 on her hit list for 9/11:

We already know that in her relentless quest for power Hillary has been as financially acquisitive and ethically agile as any politician. But she also has pursued a politics of vendetta, deceit, and extremist ideology to a remarkable degree. Hillary's embryonic Senate campaign has shown that she is determined to let nothing stand in the way of the next step in her ambitious career. She has also proven that for those who are in her way or who fail to help her, there will indeed be "hell to pay. " Never have the stakes been so high–both for her and for her opportunity to change the nation. (OIsen, Hell to Pay, p. 316).

The "official story" was that Barbara was a passenger on Flight 77 which was flown into the Pentagon. Incredibly, her husband, Theadore Olsen, was not with her on that flight and he survived.

It seems like a lot of trouble to kill one person but such was the hatred of Hillary for fearless critic Barbara Olsen. The Rockefeller juggernaut is an equal opportunity killer as they will go after females who oppose them just as readily as males.

On March 19, 2003, at the behest of Jay and Hillary, President Bush announced "Operation Iraqi Freedom."

The "shock and awe" bombing of Iraq soon followed.

In May 2003, Bush made his infamous "Mission Accomplished" speech from the carrier Abraham Lincoln.

In reality, the war was just beginning, as the Iraqis launched a guerilla campaign to retake their country from the Rockefeller Empire. Baptist Jay Rockefeller never reminded President Bush of this Scripture:

So the the king of Israel answered and said, "Tell him, let not him that girdeth on his armor boast himself as he that putteth it off" ( I Kings 20:11).

The war turned into a bloody quagmire with thousands of U.S. casualties and over 1, 500,000 Iraqis killed.

ED's Improvised Explosive Devices were used with deadly effect by the Iraqis.

Official U.S. casualties were 4,500, but the real count was far, far higher. Iraqi casualties were over 1,500,000.

Additionally, the war was bankrupting the United States.

By 2008, Hillary's hopes of becoming President were very, very remote because of the disastrous outcome of the Iraqi war . . . and the parlous state of the economy. Too many people knew that she was responsible for 9/11 . . . and the deadly war . . . so the Democratic Party ignored her.

Too many people knew that Hillary was responsible for the Iraq War, so she was not even considered for the position of Vice President.

Barack Obama and Joseph "Joe" Biden were chosen instead.

Both men were on the same ballot even though the Constitution calls for separate votes for President and Vice President.

Both men ran on the same ballot so nobody had a choice between the 2 men. It was definitely not one man one vote even though the U.S. Constitution calls for separate votes for President and Vice President:

The PERSON (singular) having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President. The PERSON (singular) having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President. (Twelfth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution).

The Amendment calling for separate votes for President and Vice President was ratified on September 25, 1804. It's hard to get a husband and wife to agree on anything so how can you have 2 completely opposite individuals on the same ballot....Most lawyers in the U.S. do not know that the Constitution calls for separate votes for President and Vice President.
The Founding Fathers never dreamed that a SHE would replace a HE as President!!

The Founding Fathers never imagined the day would come when a SHE would be President of the new nation:

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows. (U.S. Constitution, Article II).

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; HE may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and HE shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. (U.S. Constitution, Article II).

Even in their worst nightmares the Founding Fathers never dreamed that a SHE-WOLF would usurp the august position of President of the United States of Israel.

Israel was reborn on July 4, 1776, in Philadelphia.

About 10 years later the Constitution was signed in the same city of Philadelphia.

The Founding Fathers never dreamed that a SHE would replace a HE as President of the United States of Israel.

However, Daniel the Prophet predicted that dire situation over 2,500 years ago.

Daniel predicted today's perilous situation perfectly as nothing on the flat earth is hid from the all-seeing eyes of the Almighty:

And he (Antichrist) shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him (Daniel 11: 45).

At the very beginning of history, about 6,000 years ago, JEHOVAH promised a redeemer who would crush Satan's head:

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; HE shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise HISheel (Genesis 3:15).

The corrupt Latin Vulgate Version changed the word HE to SHE:

I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: SHE shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for HER heel (Genesis 3:15, Douay-Rheims Version).

The Exodus is a marvelous type of Armageddon and the end of the world. When the Egyptians were pursuing the children of Israel at the Red Sea, JEHOVAH sent his MECHANIC-ANGELS to pull off the wheels of their chariots–in order to slow them down:

And it came to pass, that in the morning watch that JEHOVAH looked unto the host of the Egyptians through the pillar of fire and of the cloud, and troubled the host of the Egyptians, and took off their chariot wheels, that they drove them heavily: so that the Egyptians said, "let us flee from the face of Israel; for JEHOVAH fighteth for them against the Egyptians" (Exodus:14:24-25).

In these last days . . . we cannot stop . . . but only slow down . . . the Rockefeller juggernaut . . . so all true U.S. of Israel Christians should become Barbara Olsens or MECHANICS for CHRIST!!

Liptusg #sexist reddit.com

"We have nothing against virgins. Also, only a terrible person could end up a virgin."

"We don't hate virgins, some of my best beta orbiters friends are virgins! We just hate those pathetic misogynistic incels who are entitled and blame their problems on whamenz! Work on ur shitty personality"

"The reason I can get face-fucked by 10 Chads on Tinder in a rape-play session is due to my impeccable 'social skills', my vagina's functionality as a moral compass, and the fact that all it takes to get a partner is some basic human decency and hygiene! If you're unable to get a partner, that's because you are fundamentally inferior to me both psychologically and morally in every way possible, otherwise you'd have no problem finding someone"

Normie logic. At every opportunity, they claim to have nothing against the 'normal', PC, left-wing yet non-volcel virgins who do not identify as incels, how much more admirable they are than incels, and so forth, positing that incels are uniquely depraved for the crime of standing up to gynocentric gaslighting. As soon as they are confronted with the fact they are committing a chronological fallacy ( You can't develop "sour grapes" attitudes without experiencing shunning, ostracism and discrimination in the first place ), or whenever circle-jerking themselves about how laughable and absurd the situation of sexually excluded men is, they always inform you that even if you do not HATE WHAMENZ or participate in wrongthinking, and yet still fail to garner even the tiniest shred of sexual attention from women, then clearly the only possible factor you should be considering is that you are an unimpressive, unaccomplished, worthless shitty person who should assign all blame to his own undefined failings ( Women's attraction being the chief authority on these matters ) or else risk the wrath of the matriarchy for even daring to entertain notions like evolutionary biology, hypergamy, macro socioeconomics of sexuality, Sexual selection, published psychological research, and other problematic ideas.

Now, putting the mountain of braindead NPC bullshit and endless documentation ( Including according to women's description of their ex-sexual partners and rants on social media ) about women's incredibly machiavellian and perverse mating criteria which we all know and love, the Mean Girls and their male enablers have clearly backed themselves into the corner of shameful cognitive dissonance with their mindless antiques, given that their mindset extends to all of the supposed token, submissive virgins they profess to have nothing against.

If all you need to get laid or have a girlfriend is some of that muh basic human decency, social etiquette, showers and 'not whining', then what those women and men are saying is that every single male virgin they know of in their life who does want sexual or romantic intimacy must be an indecent, socially retarded, filthy, pathetic, value-less whiny piece of trash. What other reason could there be for them to get rejected for so long? Truly, any 'non-incel' virgin would be lucky to have such fine folk as his friends and family.

But hey, it's cool! Just because I think that the virgins I fraternize with are the scum of the earth and pitiful losers who are worse human beings than any man who's ever stuck his dick in a girl's hole doesn't mean I'm hateful or prejudiced against them! It's uhhh, not the same, you understand. To their credit though, it must be said that some of those 'ex-permavirgin' preacher types do follow up on their own premise - by attributing their past virginity to their own worthlessness and deficiencies as woman-approved humans, which may indeed be a valid observation in their case given how philosophically stunted they are, yet one which unfortunately they project on everyone else and insist on blind adherence to - you're either a self-flagellating virgin, or a world-blaming loser.

For this reason, you find women and normies stammering all over themselves in various subreddits during times of social expediency ( Most of the time though in AskWomen and the like, they'll just launch into a full tirade about how inferior and defective the poster must be, and how good it will be for him to accept that ) to mask the logical extension of their mindsets whenever some virgin man comes prostrating himself before them, prefacing his thread with countless apologies, before expressing his sorrow over not achieving their sexual transcendence. At which point, several damage control first responders might awkwardly come out with the following:

"Teehee, I'm sure there's a right person somewhere, it took me 10 years of College sex partying before I finally met the husband of my dreams! We are alike!"

"Uhhh, errr, durr, emm, w-w-what do you even need to think about sex and relationships for? Just focus on uh.. other things and just..wait...nervous glances

Poster: But I want to know exactly why is that -

"Shut up you piece of shit! You don't want to sound like an entitled whiny incel, do you? Just go participate in more hobby groups and patiently keep your head down until you're magically in a relationship. And don't ever ask any questions about women's decisions ever again."

Of course, none of the answers that any virgin will be getting are going to rationally explain why is it that for the majority of someone's life, no woman ever finds him to be 'her type', nor eager and welcoming to his advances as much as she will be to any crass 'creepy PM' from a Chad on Tinder, for as long as women and normies refuse to recognize the Halo Effect, Gender Dimorphic sexual selection, Dark Triad psychology and overall, the indisputable historical and scientific truth that the correlation between being a Just person, wisdom, and other profound concepts to sex appeal is completely null, and that only a weak correlation exists even for being an interesting conversationlist or 'muh confidence' in comparison to appearance, dominance and power.

And so their only choice is either deflect, deflect, deflect, or own up to the fact that they hold each and every single involuntary virgin they ever met in their life in contempt, as an inferior person and non-decent human being who must be patronized about their flawed and despicable existence as the reason of failing to gain traction with women's base instincts. ( But remember, they love diversity and hate othering of deviant and non-binary social groups ).

You can't have it both ways, friend-o's. You either accept the facts of sexual dynamics throughout human evolution and their amoral, reactionary nature, or you admit just how much toxicity, smug self-superiority and disdain you harbor toward every single virgin on the planet who is not abstinent by choice. Feel free to PM me with justifications too if you want, would love to hear it.

Coach #fundie christiannews.net

Actually, public schools teach direct opposition of Christianity. If I tell students they shouldn't have sex outside of marriage, I'd be told I was enforcing my beliefs on the students, yet when a boy wants to change in a girl's locker room, it's called equality.
I could show students a video of people having sex and that's educational, but if I say "the Bible says" I'm breaking the law and need to stop. If a student walks around the school and brags about how many girls he's been with, it's appropriate for a teacher to applaud him, but the student who walks around proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ, he must be stopped, because an evil world will tolerate the rape of women before hearing about Jesus Christ.
There's no such thing as being neutral when it comes to the truth.
He who is not with Me is against Me, and he who does not gather with Me scatters abroad. Matthew 12:30

You do the devil's bidding by calling good evil and calling evil good.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
21 Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes,
And prudent in their own sight!

I have to agree, that by teaching Christianity, he's violating the law, but when the law goes against the world's sin, they change the law and celebrate breaking it. How many principals are there who drive drunk, use illegal drugs, etc.

Fact is Christians take consequences for what we believe, chaplains being discharged, a local college student being expelled for his Christian beliefs not fitting those of his college's counseling program, no refund, nothing. Pastors being arrested for public proclamation of the gospel in ur "free" nation.
The cost of following Christ is high, but consider the even greater cost of going against Him.

The wicked shall be turned into hell,
And all the nations that forget God. Psalm 9:17

Psalm 7:10 My defense is of God,
Who saves the upright in heart.
11 God is a just judge,
And God is angry with the wicked every day.
12 If he does not turn back,
He will sharpen His sword;
He bends His bow and makes it ready.

You're saying there is no right and wrong, it's all subjective, so the principal shouldn't teach Christianity in a school of violence, because you don't like it. So according to your thinking, there's nothing wrong with kids being molested if it fits the general social norms.
Overall, you're saying, I'm a pretty good person Proverbs 20:6 Most men will proclaim each his own goodness,
But who can find a faithful man?
You sound like the average American "I do right by my fellow man, pay my bills, I'm not a bad person" Not intending that in a mocking way, but consider this, you're a criminal in the highest court in the universe. God who is eternally existing Father, Son, and Spirit; created all the universe, not out of necessity, but His good pleasure to do so. In the grand scheme of all the universe,the planet earth is but a speck, you exist as a speck on a speck and insult the God who created and sustains your life. You've violated every law He's gave. You've done evil while ignoring conscious and calling it good.
Consider
Surely You set them in slippery places;
You cast them down to destruction.
19 Oh, how they are brought to desolation, as in a moment!
They are utterly consumed with terrors.
Deuteronomy 32:35 Vengeance is Mine, and recompense;
Their foot shall slip in due time;
For the day of their calamity is at hand,
And the things to come hasten upon them.

Why, so much anger, you have no idea what the Bible says, you just know you hate God. You are arrogant in your unbelief. You love your sin and the Bible tells the truth about you. Your heart is full of evil, lust, envy, hatred of good, but what I hear you saying is Hey coach stop worshipping Jesus and serve the sin nature, forsake the truth, return to the darkness, don't you quote that Bible, I don't like it. Because of Christ, I am no longer a slave to sin, no longer blinded to the truth, no longer addicted to porn. I couldn't go back to the world even if God said I wouldn't be judged for it.

Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”Galatians 3:13

Galatians 1:11 But I make known to you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man. 12 For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but it came through the revelation of Jesus Christ.

13 For you have heard of my former conduct in Judaism, how I persecuted the church of God beyond measure and tried to destroy it. 14 And I advanced in Judaism beyond many of my contemporaries in my own nation, being more exceedingly zealous for the traditions of my fathers.

15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb and called me through His grace, 16 to reveal His Son in me, that I might preach Him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately confer with flesh and blood,

Answer me this question, is it wrong to murder? How do you determine your answer?

God has perfect knowledge of all things, but unlike your neighborhood church throwing Super Bowl parties to impress your carnal mind, God converts sinners, giving them a new nature as He has mercy on whom He wills and whom He wills, He hardens.

Romans 9:13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.

In real life, the empty tomb is there, the place where the temple stood that Jesus said would be destroyed. The Bible says in the last days there will be mockers, men will be lovers of themselves, etc. Those who desire to live godly lives are persecuted in some way, evil men and imposters grow worse and worse.
Research how the apostles died, tell me what you find prior to your next foolish statement, tell me if you'd endure that to defend your atheism.

Yes, I could see how that would be the conclusion of someone who's never read the Bible. Your willfull ignorance doesn't excuse the fact that you will stand before the Lord Jesus Christ, but you assume that by mocking and denying the truth, it goes away.
Jesus said "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words never will" Consider how many revisions the average textbook goes through, yet the Bible's truth is unchanging. Every prophesy has been fulfilled exactly as prophesied, the apostles suffered immense persecution as Jesus said they would. Believers today suffer immense persecution and testify of being radically transformed by the power of the gospel.
I bear personal testimony of the gospel's transforming power. I was full of cursing and bitterness, envy, and perverted lust, but God has transformed me and though I am not perfectly sinless, nor will I be in this lifetime, I thank God that He's redeemed me from the depths of my sinfulness, so the idea of the Bible being fiction is completely foolish. You mock a holy God and praise a beverage brand, while cursing the God who gave and sustains your life. Repent and believe on Jesus Christ.

You can hate the truth, that doesn't change it, fact is God, who is infinitely holy commands all men everywhere to repent. You're a slave to sin and serve the desires of your master, the devil, as I once did, but have been set free by the power of Jesus Christ, who took on flesh and endured the wrath of God on behalf of sinners. You hate a man for proclaiming that truth and defend those who encourage human sacrifice to their false gods (I'm almost certain, you can't deny this)
As it is written:
There is none righteous, no, not one; There is none who understands; There is none who seeks after God.
They have all turned aside; They have together become unprofitable; There is none who does good, no, not one.
Their throat is an open tomb; With their tongues they have practiced deceit; The poison of asps is under their lips
Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness
Their feet are swift to shed blood;
Destruction and misery are in their ways;
And the way of peace they have not known.
There is no fear of God before their eyes. Romans 3:10-18

You are condemned and awaiting judgement, I assure you it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

Whoever believes in Him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. John 3:18-20

Your god is the god of this evil age, not the one true god, it's obvious that you're faithful to him, but I warn you, he'll be cast into the lake of fire at the judgement throne of Jesus Christ, along with everyone not written in the book of life. Repent of your sins and turn to Christ, the one who has the power to cast body and soul into hell, whom you've mocked your entire life, in spite of the fact that He's given you life and can take it away in an instant. Before you say "oh you're trying to scare me into believing", consider the fact that false converts will be cast into the lake of fire, many of whom go to church and appear to be godly. So unless you be converted, you will suffer the wrath of God that abides on you currently.
Jesus Christ, the sinless Son of God took on human flesh, was born into the world He had made of a virgin in a stinking stable, was despised and rejected by those who claim to serve God. He performed miracles, clearly seen by multitudes of healing, casting out demons, raising the dead. He was betrayed by one of His disciples, suffered the wrath of God at the hands of sinners and rose from the grave to be the mediator for all who will believe on Him. Why couldn't God just forgive people without Christ's suffering?, because that would make God unjust. Because God is good, He must punish every bit of evil. Because God is eternal, the offense is greater. If a boy lies to his teacher, he gets a 0, he lies to his parents, he gets grounded, lies to police, he gets arrested, but all sin is against an infinitely holy God. There's no neutral ground with God, you're either a savant of God having been saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, or His enemy.

Romans 5:8 But God demonstrates His love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.
Christ died for the ungodly that would later repent and believe on Him and one is saved by trusting Him alone, not "good" deeds, not reforming one's behavior, not repeating a prayer, not being baptized, no by faith alone in Jesus Christ. I suggest you start with reading the Bible. By mocking Christianity on a Christian site, you waste your life, which is as a vapor in comparison to eternity. I speak as one raised on the religion of the age along with some Christian teaching, who held to being a Christian and repeated tons of prayers, but God saved this religionists out of his sin, out of his bondage to pornography, I don't say that as a sob story, but as praise to the all powerful God, who is gracious to whomever He wills to be, not because of my so-called good deeds, but in spite of them. To God alone be the glory and He will be glorified in either saving you for Himself or casting you into the lake of fire. If you could but get a glimpse of His infinite worth and how you a finite creature have insulted Him. Repent and trust the Lord Jesus Christ. Have no confidence in yourself. You must be born again, by the sovereign grace of our Lord Jesis Christ.

This man is violating his role as a principal, doesn't he know there's a separation between church and state? Or maybe, he recognizes that God is sovereign and we ought to obey Him rather than men.

Nathan Larson #fundie larsonfordelegate.com

(Nathan Larson is a candidate for Virginia state delegate who previously made waves for his stances in favor of legalizing pedophilia, incest and child porn. He has since drastically updated his campaign website and focus. His new signature issue is making assisted suicide available to all, including moody teenagers).

What effect would legalizing pentobarbital for suicide have on rates of recreational use?

If the pentobarbital were to be administered by a suicide clinic, this would likely be a non-issue, since they would only be administering lethal doses.

But even if it were made available over-the-counter, I don't think there would be much effect. After cannabis is legalized, drug users will probably mostly switch to cannabis. Also, most drug users are probably aware that pentobarbital is a dangerous drug best reserved for suicide.

But supposing some recreational users did get hold of it, and overdose on it, this could help weed out of the population those who might have a tendency toward drug abuse, so in the end, it's a net positive.

How much demand will there be for assisted suicide clinics?

I'm thinking the demand could be pretty high, especially among students. According to the CDC, among students in grades 9-12 in the U.S. during 2013:

17.0% of students seriously considered attempting suicide in the previous 12 months (22.4% of females and 11.6% of males).

13.6% of students made a plan about how they would attempt suicide in the previous 12 months (16.9% of females and 10.3% of males).

8.0% of students attempted suicide one or more times in the previous 12 months (10.6% of females and 5.4% of males).

2.7% of students made a suicide attempt that resulted in an injury, poisoning, or an overdose that required medical attention (3.6% of females and 1.8% of males).

That is a lot of people who could potentially benefit from this reform.

Cody #fundie offgridsurvival.com

Dear Preppers: There are indeed dire circumstances coming. There is much preparation needed. Do you know what’s coming? Jesus Christ has given His followers specific details as to what is coming. Keep your eye on the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. That is the turn key event for everything to come down. What is the remainder of what is coming down – HE told us specifically. Why: Because HE wants people to know that HE IS STILL IN CONTROL NO MATTER what these governments, Nibiru, etc. LOOK like they are going to do. Here are just a few of the things HE has prepared his followers for: The Dome of the Rock is going to be destroyed first as the turn key event. Then Miami is going to be bombed (nuclear) shortly after that. New York is also going to be bombed and go under water. There will be several other places bombed but he did not get more specific than those two for now. Then, the Rapture (Removal) of All of Jesus Believers/Followers are going to be removed from this earth. The people that remain will be going through horrors such as has not been seen on this earth prior to this time. Those remaining will be told that “Aliens” – “Greys” have taken those people for “whatever reason”. Know for a fact, that the “aliens” – “greys” are demons masquerading as “harmless” galaxy interlopers looking for a “people to help”. Remember that you read this here because they will be sent to destroy this planet; however, they are on a leash so to speak – they can only go as far as Father God allows them to go. He has also told us that Russia is going to attack us from the Northern Border of the US. We will see planes flying overhead and troops parachuting out. There are also Russian troops here on our soils that are ready to move when given the order. Also, HE is going to intervene and not let an EMP knock out all communications in the US nationwide. HE Is going to use the communication systems to keep His Remnant in touch with one another. Those people remaining who see that GOD has predicted and carried out His specific promises and come to believe and follow HIM, will be protected supernaturally by God. He will provide food, water, shelter, and even invisibility to those who truly believe and follow Him. If you follow and believe in Him, you will be provided for and protected. If you try to live by your own wits, you will not.
Nibiru will be here at the end of 7 years after Jesus’ followers have been removed. The earth’s crust will be rotated by God and all of those “elite” individuals in the D.U.M.B’s will be sealed in their subterranean tombs. These underground bunkers will be filled with magma and water due to the earth’s crust shifting. The North Pole may be somewhere down around Arizona/New Mexico area. Also, HE has changed the Yellowstone volcano eruption to be Much Less than everyone has anticipated. It will blow but not with the magnitude expected. Magma will bubble up from underground and flow out like rivers just like the Kilauea volcano in Hawaii has been doing for decades. Towards the end of that seven year period this nation, USA, will be divided in half – pretty much all the way along the Mississippi River – it will take more than a Ferry to cross it. Martial law will be enacted after these bombings and you will be required to take a “mark” to ensure “security, safety” and to buy and sell anything – receive medical treatment, etc. DO NOT TAKE THAT MARK!!!! That mark will include an electronic interface that can actually alter the thinking/decision making in the brain. You can be incited to kill by someone or to riot just by someone sending a code to your specific mark number.

Once you take the mark, you will be forever separated from GOD and will end up in HELL for refusing to believe that He is the one that can save your soul. Please, I beg you, don’t take that Mark!!!!!

The purpose of sharing these specific items with you is so you can ask Jesus NOW to take control of YOUR life and the lives of YOUR LOVED ONES. That is the only way to escape what is coming. If you or your loved ones don’t believe, understand, or scoff at this message now, know that this is coming to pass and you will know that what has been told to you is truly from GOD. Even in the midst of the turmoil, you can turn to GOD if YOU DON”T TAKE THE MARK!

I know a lot of people won’t agree with this post and that is fine. I KNOW without a doubt what my Savior told me. We have been given much more specific details and know what to do when things hit.
We know we have supernatural protection. Most churches or “christians” you may have met in your life may not have understood or even lived the way Jesus wanted them to – hypocritically. That is something all of them are going to be responsible for when they stand before the Lord.

You CAN have peace, safety, security beyond belief and joy even in the midst of what is coming. If anyone wants to know how to come to Jesus, it’s very simple. If this is something you TRULY and GENUINELY want to change from the very core of your heart, just say the following: “Jesus, I believe that you died on the Cross to pay for my sin as well as the sins of everyone else in this world. I believe you went to Hell and rose again from the dead and live in Heaven. You are willing to forgive me for EVERYTHING I’ve EVER DONE just by asking you to. So, Jesus, I’m asking you to forgive me of my sins and cleanse me from all evil. I choose right now by my free will to live for and follow You. Thank you for your mercy and grace. Teach me now how to live and follow You. Amen.”

The above prayer is NOT an “insurance policy” against what’s coming or HELL. You MUST mean this with your whole heart and desire above all else to follow Jesus. THEN, you will experience His Highest, Most Faithful provision for you! To begin following, living for and learning WHO JESUS is; start by reading the book of JOHN in the Bible. God’s Holy Spirit wrote the Bible through human beings and was sent here to the Earth to help believers when they face trials or temptations in their lives. HE Speaks to them and directs them daily – moment by moment if need be! Just like He wants to reach all of those you Love THROUGH YOU!

I’ll answer questions you may have about how to follow and live for the Lord in these last days. Thank you for reading this post. Cody.

skogkille #racist stormfront.org

Re: Reasons, why the Cold war is harmful for the Aryan benefit

This sentiment is embodied in Don Black’s Stormfront philosophy: ‘White power worldwide’—not only in privileged areas, and ‘No attacks against other White nationalities.’ I believe the majority here fully endorse White Aryan unity, realising that anything less undermines our race and cause. Worse, it supports our enemies: the ZOGs in Western nations and the lesser races that overrun us daily.

The realpolitik manoeuvrings of nation-states, political parties and political leaders need not be confused with the volk’s national interest. The American and French revolutions, together with many others, indeed, justify themselves by the premiss that no government has any immutable claim on the allegiance of its volk that it can rely on to withstand broad discontent. Just because my president says we are to go to war, that does not automatically equate to something that is either necessary or beneficial to the citizenry, or something that I ought to feel patriotically bound to embrace—as instructed.

No one knows better than we how the jewish royal family, the Rothschilds, showed the way by financing all sides in the Napoleonic Wars. Since that time, the Money-Changers have arranged assassinations, incidents, unrest, coups, revolutions, false flag attacks, pulled the strings of their political puppets, and whipped up media frenzies to arrange wars. They’ve manoeuvred nation-states in a grand chess game to maintain a balance of power—to maximise war’s duration by equalising both sides when it came. They have cobbled together countries in board rooms without troubling to consult the locals, without the slightest attention to historic or cultural boundaries, often cramming together mutually hostile groups, according to their own agenda—always inimical to mankind’s general well-being.

If we can see how the governments of the Soviet Union, the United States, and the rest of the Western sphere, were under the clandestine control of the Oberjuden, yet engaged in a Cold War seemingly against themselves, the national fervour reinforcing it is revealed as a hollow sham, nothing more than fuel keeping the machine rolling along.

Everyone is familiar with the elementary concept of an unpopular, oppressive government enhancing its control over a captive population through a police state apparatus. But George Orwell described in his novel 1984 a psyops enhancement of this standard model whereby the maximal security is excused with the cover story of protecting the population from external threat.

Now, the common man’s innocent understanding of this situation is that his nation’s army will strive to overcome the enemy, and the victory will then usher in a dismantling of the police state, whose oppressive security will no longer be necessary. Orwell’s twist on this was that the Big Brother Government—whose interest was to maintain the maximal security keeping it in power—lovingly nurtured the enemy in order to maintain the useful threat and avoid an inconvenient victory. The military industrial complex has been intertwined with government long enough for most wide awake to see how the symbiotic relationship yielded a crop of splendid little proxy wars.

For proof of this interpretation of the Cold War, consider these steps taken to maintain the balance of power:

* The 2 partisan armies operating in Yugoslavia against the Germans consisted of Tito’s communists and Mihailovitch’s nationalists. It is arguable whether supporting both was done in pursuit solely of the balance of power, or simply to maximise the war effort. But once the Germans withdrew, support for Tito eclipsed that given Mihailovitch.

* The FDR Administration directed SHAEF to hold back Anglo-American advances from penetrating too far into German territory.

* General Patton clamoured to use the Anglo-American forces against the Soviets and drive them out of Germany and East Europa—until he was involved in a very convenient and suspicious accident [I say assassination].

* The FDR Administration directed SHAEF to ‘repatriate’ tens of thousands of Russians and Eastern Europeans into the loving embrace of the NKVD. An interesting US war crime that has been footnoted out of existence. Meanwhile Stalin was set under no reciprocal obligation to return the tens of thousands of Germans and Axis prisoners consigned to Siberian gulags.

* As the Nationalist Chinese were retreating before Mao’s red hordes, UN, US or any Western involvement was conveniently absent. There was a window of a few years where the US was the sole superpower, with atomics, capable of reordering the world according to their ‘professed’ design. I contend that 3 or so well placed bombs would have taken out Mao, and freed China, and probably all Asia, from the communist grip and their many wars and genocides.

* When General MacArthur, like Patton before him, clamoured for a full-blooded effort to push the North Korean army completely out of their country, and pepper China with atomics if they made any hostile move, Truman sacked him.

* When Castro’s communist guerrillas were battling Bautista, again, NATO, the US or any Western involvement was conveniently absent. The CIA’s Bay of Pigs invasion was too little too late, crippled by a shoestring budget and Kennedy Administration roadblocks.

* The Vietnam War was notorious for the countless limitations set on the strategy, amounting to fighting with one hand tied behind the back. The North Vietnamese were granted invaluable sanctuaries in neighbouring Cambodia and Laos. The much-touted bombing campaigns against the North were, in reality, limited to brief spurts of effort interspersed with abundant time to recover, the targets and airspace were very tightly controlled, and shipping in Haiphong harbour was off limits. The DMZ border was never violated by the US/ARVN, whilst the North’s stated policy was to violate it as much as they could. Ground was never held, and the map was littered with sites that hundreds and thousands died to take, only to yield to the enemy later.

* Western armies have lately entered into a new era of warfare, where their traditional role of killing the enemy has become overshadowed by the much longer mission of ‘rebuilding.’ The rise of guerrilla warfare suits the Oberjuden agenda by providing ample excuse for failing to win decisive victories, and dragging out wars beyond all reason. The US ‘war’ in Afghanistan has now stretched beyond any before (Oct 2001 to present).

* The Western policy for Iraq has throughout been to spare no sacrifice to maintain the integrity of a state cobbled together in a boardroom to suit colonial powers. The fact that the region would have self-stabilised if each of the 3 groups had been permitted to form sovereign nations, is a dread secret that can never be uttered. It suits the Oberjuden agenda both to maintain a forever war, and to thwart the sort of national-racial integrity that sovereignty inevitably poses against their drive to international blocs and eventual global hegemony.

* It is obvious to me, and I have heard more than one general express, that China is the greatest potential enemy the West faces. Yet, once again, in pursuit of the balance of power [I contend], our cyber security is ceaselessly breached; espionage is constantly making off with secret technologies and intelligence; a trade deficit/imbalance is meekly accepted by hapless negotiators; Chicom has become the greatest lender to the US; Chicom investors are permitted to buy up Western assets; and all manner of outrages are tolerated with newt-like protests, such as conquering Tibet, capturing US aircraft and ship crews and Asian fishing vessels, laying claim to extra areas of sea and islands, and artificially devaluing their currency. The amount they spend on their military is out of all proportion to any local security needs, and is plainly ramping up to challenge the West.

The fact that I am not acquainted with it is no reason to presume that the Soviet Union and Russian Federation do not have a list along these same lines.

SmuttyTheClown #homophobia #wingnut deviantart.com

Smutty, like yourself, is on a never-ending quest to rid the world of degeneracy, and it warms his cold heart whenever he sees a few rays of nonrainbow-colored light!

Despite all of the nastiness that has shown its ugly gender-confused face, this "LGBT Pride Month" has seen some promising developments in the fight against gay aggression. Jack Phillips won his six-year fight against the fag couple that tried to force him to bake them a wedding cake. On June 4th, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of the Christian baker from Colorado. Guess the lefties will have to go somewhere else next time they want a bakery of leftist culture, such as a man and dog getting it on!

That was followed today, June 27th, by an announcement that shocked many. Decrepit and pro-gay Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement. That means that Trump can name a replacement, and hopefully get him confirmed before the November elections or during the lame duck session. Baby killers and LGBT degenerates everywhere are shaking in their shoes.

A few weeks ago the LGBT community was humiliated by a more hidden foe, as the anons on 4chan's pol pulled their latest prank. Memes were spread for #droptheB, which confused many queers and "allies" into thinking that it was a well-meaning campaign. After all, does bisexual not imply that there are only two genders, and not 63? LGBT is then a hypocritical term.

Speaking of hypocrites, leftist cunt Kathleen Wynne, the Premier of Ontario, Canada, was absolutely shalacked in the election earlier this month. Warned to quit beforehand, the cunt thankfully decided that she wanted to bring her party down with her. They finished third with only seven seats and failed to maintain official party status! On June 7th election night she finally gave up and tearfully resigned as Liberal Party leader. An open lesbian, it looks like some schoolkids might soon be saved from her programs that intend to make them as sexually disturbed as she is.

Many other battles to defend our children against gay encroachment are still ongoing, some as ridiculous as the mental health of a fictional Disney character. There is a push to make Disney's Elsa be a carpet muncher in the upcoming kids movie, Frozen 2. Rather than shoot down the perverse notion, aimed at indoctrinating children into the gay sexual lifestle, writer and co-director Jennifer Lee told hate site HuffPost that "we have tons of conversations about it" and "We’ll see where we go".

Consider that Disney's Marvel Entertainment has already confirmed that outwardly faggy characters will soon appear in their films. Kevin Feige, President of Marvel Studios, just told The Playlist on June 25th that it will be "Both [characters] you’ve seen and ones you haven’t seen." So, there will be some newly invented superfags, and you might wake up to find that your favorite formerly masculine comic book hero now enjoys the intimacy of other men.

Drag Queen Story Hour, the American child abuse tour, continues to flaunt their sexual sickness in front of children as young as four and five years old. Forbes, which has become a fag news outlet lately, published an article on June 20th claiming "drag queens are the perfect people to read out loud to little ones" because they capture the "gender fluidity of childhood". Today, in fact, the kinder-seeking queens are in Beloit, Wisconsin, a town of 36,000 people. The residents have shown some fight by writing and calling the library, but in the end, their town's kids will most likely get their dose of gay sex propaganda.

That brings us to the latest joint venture between homosexuality and pedophilia which begins airing tomorrow. RuPaul's thinly-veiled young-boy-indoctrination cartoon, Drag Tots, will air on the World of Wonder channel. Today, Entertainment Weekly begins their congratulatory article about it with the following line, "It’s never too early to slip into your first pair of heels, contour your cheekbones, or learn the basics of drag culture."

On the contrary, Smutty encourages you to go out and win more victories for sexual sanity. The media is clearly trying to get your sons, daughters, brothers, and sisters to live a life of sadness and pain, probably culminating in an early death from drugs or disease. It is never to early to strike out in defense.

Fiveos2 #racist reddit.com

[Comment under "I think I'll have to be the one to say it: The synagogue shooting was genuinely unacceptable, evil, and ended innocent lives" about the Pittsburg synagogue shooting]

I agree with what you are saying in general....but I think it is worth pointing out that this particular synagogue seemed to be targeted because of its support for the 'Hebrew immigration aid society'...which is an organization that I honestly think could be fairly considered an enemy to the USA, and dedicated to the dispossession and destruction of white americans.

jews in general absolutely have a right to exist...but this attack was not targeting jews at random...it was targeting specific jews...and it was not really unprovoked.

Johannes Steinhand #conspiracy disclose.tv

Evidence is emerging that the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) may have been indirectly responsible another recent 7.1 earthquake in the small town of Kaikoura, New Zealand.

Since the machine was first switched on in 2010, there has been a significant increase in seismic activity, with an average 13 earthquake’s of magnitude 7.0- 9.9 / year recorded in the early 2000s compared to 19 in 2015. For the first time in history, two super-quakes of 8.8 occurred in consecutive years (Chile and Japan). The Fukishima earthquake occurred just after the LHC resumed following upgrades to the facility and quantum manipulation of the Earth’s magnetic field.

In 2014, CERN underwent major upgrades to the facility to enable the collider to conduct particle physics at 10Tev and beyond with a view of exploring dark matter and the fundamentals of particle physics. Inside sources have reported the LHC has been successful in its creation of dark matter which is currently undergoing weaponization trials.

With the Amazon Warrior currently trawling New Zealand waters, what better disguise for a dark matter depth charge weapon trial (right ahead of one of the world’s largest weapons expo) than a “seismic blasting vessel”! The flotilla of US warships floating is nothing more than supply vessels for the world’s first largescale test of DM weapons technology

As billionaire arms dealing Zionists swarm into Auckland, the earthquake was triggered with the unexpected and unplanned fireworks on Auckland harbour bridge testament to a successful test. Disgruntled Conservative John Kerry was seen fleeing the scene in the hours leading up to the event due to the unpredictable nature of a DM weapons testing.

The first international press release pertaining to the earthquake came out from CERN, who detected the test from Switzerland, pioneering a new era of environmental warfare

This technology could well be used in the elimination of potential nuclear threats, marking an end to smaller countries nuclear programs such as North Korea. The disruption of vital supply lines and food sources and the decimation of the east coast of New Zealand’s south Island is testament to the power available

With testing expected to continue New Zealand should expect the unprecedented seismic activity to continue for some time, with more big shocks possibly to come as the technology put to trials at sea

Directly over CERN, the cloud formation is very interesting.

CERN schedule states an experiment called awake was due to begin on June 24.

The LHC is the world’s largest and most powerful machine and is actually used to collide particles at close to the speed of light in a bid to discover more about physics and the possibility of parallel universes. This why the weather is so crazy all over the planet

The curious machine developed across a 16-mile ring of superconducting magnets has had critics before amid claims it could inadvertently create a black hole that may swallow up the world CERN, of course denies it has carried out experiments to create artificial seismic events to better understand global forming.

The official line on what the Awake experiments are about is to develop a new type of accelerator to cut the size of the huge particle physics experiments down by a factor of a hundred or more so they can be carried out on table tops.

The AWAKE experiment, also known as the "Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment," will use a whole new method that will get particles going much faster in a shorter amount of time - results are not expected until 2018, this could mark the true start of WW3.

Daren Mehl #fundie darenmehlblog.com

LEFOU, YOU’RE NOT GAY FRIEND!

Dear Lefou,

Before you start thinking you’re gay and acting out with behaviors you’re not familiar with, hear me out. I think there is more to you than your sexuality, and there is more going on in your life related to your newly discovered feelings toward Gaston. Instead of accepting the false identity of a gay man, you should consider the following:

Many people will be claiming that you’re gay, because you have an attraction to a guy that you just can’t place. You find him extremely attractive, and you’re not sure why. You hear from people that you must be gay! And that seems like the easy answer. You’ve seen movies with gay people in them and feel like you can relate to them. You’ve seen how your peers at Disney romanticize same- sex relationships as being healthy and normal; and it brings you peace thinking that could be you. Now that you’ve got this feeling you can’t hide, that deep down desire that is directed toward Gaston, you probably think that must mean you are gay, huh? Before you hasten to choose a gay identity, consider that there are negative factors that could be influencing your identity and behavior, if not subconsciously, then overtly. You may recall things as I mention them, or you may have to pray to recall repressed memories.

HERE WE GO, WILL YOU HEAR ME OUT LEFOU?

What if certain things from your past have caused you to have these unusual feelings? Many people who have been where you are, took on the gay identity, only to find themselves coming to a different identity that isn’t gay. Me for example. This is because they have identified experiences from their past that led them to nurture a mistaken identity.

What are these experiences? They include unrealized masculine qualities you wish you had and covet in other men (Gaston for example), feelings of rejection from women (so I’ve heard Claudette, Laurette and Paulette have been hard on you), lack of healthy masculine relationships with other men, and a really dark subject, abuse. Let’s review these one at a time:

UNREALIZED MASCULINE QUALITIES

Let me tell you about what happened to me here. I grew up very smart like you, energetic, fun to have around. Also like you, I was not really athletic and the girls ridiculed me constantly. I also found myself wishing I was the alpha male, daydreaming of being one of those big guys who got the attention of the girls and was awesome in all sports. (I suppose for you it’s hunting and fishing?) Something in me changed over time because of the coveting and the lust of their masculinity, including their bodies. I started to see them as attractive, not platonicly speaking, but with a desire to possess. With many of my peers jeering at my lack of masculinity, and calling me gay and queer because of it, I wondered if that was the explanation as to why I had those feelings. Perhaps those feelings were sexual? And if they were sexual toward the same sex, I must be gay?

You see LeFou, you have been bullied for a long time by Gaston. That guy has a huge ego, and he uses people like you to feel important and strong. It’s seems he is demonstrating dysfunctional behaviors in relationships with both men and women and needs help. He has been teasing you and demonstrating his masculinity to taunt you for his benefit. You recognize his strength and are intimidated by it, yet somewhat curious and attracted to it. What could be happening is the masculine qualities you think you don’t or can’t have that he possesses is causing feelings of desire. He seems to be using that to his benefit. It seems you’re stuck in a victimzier/victim relationship.

LACK OF HEALTHY MASCULINE MALE RELATIONSHIPS

I went the majority of my life without a healthy masculine relationship. My father, God bless him, was very busy man working to take care of our family, but unavailable for those father/son bonding experiences that you see in old shows like My Three Sons or Leave it to Beaver. The male peers with whom I hung out frequently made me the brunt of the jokes because I was a pushover. Always wanting to please others, wanting people to like me because I was so alone– wait, isn’t that your story? Yeah, we’re a lot alike.

It wasn’t until later in life that I met a male friend who eventually became a spiritual brother to me. My friend demonstrated masculinity in a way that didn’t intimidate or show condescension towards me. He wanted to help me find my masculinity. He came alongside me and encouraged my growth instead of holding his masculinity above me like a carrot to get me to do things.

Gaston is using you, and you are allowing it because you are getting male attention, albeit all negative . It is true he is a handsome and strong man, a seemingly very capable individual. But he dangles it over you to get a response for his ego, to get you to serve him, to oogle over him. Like I said, his ego is so big he uses women and men and wants them to swoon over him.

But you know what? There are better guys out there who will be your brother. Some other guys will come along and befriend you. These new friends will be your equal and your guide you in obtaining the masculine qualities you want. They can help you get comfortable in your own skin. Ask and I bet they can help you in prayer as you seek counseling from therapists. And then you’ll learn the strong men in your life are your peers, not your lovers.

TROUBLES WITH THE LADIES

Here is another area I have some experience in. Not the good kind, the bad kind. I see how the ladies treat you with disdain. They look at you and wince. In middle school I was setup by three mean girls. They invited me to ‘the dance’ with a plan to destroy me. When I arrived at my date’s house, they literally cornered me in the den and emotionally berated and emasculated me. I ran home for support, but instead, I was rejected by my step mother and told to go to my room.

I was crushed. It was not until years later that I learned I had believed those girls when they said I was gay, that I was ugly and stupid, and that no girl (or woman) would ever want to be with me. This experience dramatically changed the way I related to women and ultimately how I related to men. Not trusting women with my feelings, that left me with men. Now that I’ve recovered from that trauma, I am able to trust a woman with my feelings.

ABUSE

If you read the news, you’ll see there sure are a lot of stories around questioning identity and sexual brokenness lately. People are discovering their ‘true’ selves after being abused. George Takei was sexually molested as a 13 year old child by a male adult at a summer camp before he took on a gay identity. Ellen Degeneres was sexually assaulted by her step father over and over. Milo Yiannopoulos was sexually abused as a 13 year old by a man and later again by another man. Tragically, when children are exposed to sexual abuse, they can get very confused, hide the abuse from their parents, or worse not be believed by their parents, and then bury the pain and later act out in unhealthy ways by making poor choices and end up taking on identities they wouldn’t have ever had if they had not been abused.

Have you been abused? You don’t need to tell me. I ask just to give you something consider if you need healing in that area of your life.

SEEKING HELP

If any of these areas ring true to your heart, and you believe there may be any sort of brokenness; I would encourage you to seek professional therapy and support. It seems the longer you go, the farther you’ll repress that pain until it becomes part of your identity.
What do I mean by that? Well, for many people there comes a point when you just give up and ‘admit’ you’re are gay because you can’t address the pain of the causes of your brokenness or explain or deal with the confusing or unwanted same sex attraction. The ‘coming out’ experience seems inevitable when compared to the huge wall of pain. Giving in feels like a relief because sometimes it’s easier to accept the identity of a gay person than to address the pain of brokenness. I’m not saying this is your struggle or your solution, just hoping to enlighten you that this could be an issue for you and if so there is hope for wholeness. It was certainly a struggle for me, and I prayed and God lead me to healing my brokenness and restoration of my true identity. Write me back and we can talk more about that.

Sincerely,

Daren
Your Not Gay Friend

vasisdas #fundie forums.liveleak.com

[13-year-old stoned to death after reporting rape]

As odd as it may sound I fully support the ultraconservatives in this case even considering the measures taken to maintain strict sexual morals. Under Islamist rule Somali was one the only subsaharan nation to be spared by AIDS.

artificialgraymatter #transphobia #sexist #conspiracy reddit.com

Re: Curious TIM enquires about the mental effects estrogen has had on other male users in a trans forum. Results in some... interesting replies.

image

Interesting how liking men is considered female behavior. Sure, the average woman is interested in men, but where does that leave lesbians? Do lesbians "think like men", if that's the case? I'm genuinely curious what they think about that.

Apparently, estrogen makes one like men.

Lesbians must not have estrogen. 😏

"I interact differently with my son"

that poor kid.

also, if doctors start spending money researching how to shove wombs into mentally ill dudes we deserve to go extinct.

we men deserve to go extinct

Doctors come in both sexes, and I think the comment refers to the doctors..

Western medicine is a patriarchal institution founded and enforced by men. And even female doctors are their pawns.

So, regardless of your presumption, the sentiment still stands. But yes, women should totally be punished for what men do...

Larry Solomon #fundie #sexist biblicalsexology.com

(I imagine most of you are acquainted with Larry Solomon, of ‘Biblical Gender Roles’ fame. He has started a new blog called ‘Biblical Sexology’, the content of which should be pretty predictable considering the content of his previous blog. This post is part 1 of a two-part post.)

What God Wants Men to Want From Sex

Today we are told that the primary thing husbands should want from sex is to emotionally bond with their wives. Many Christian teachers teach that is sinful for a man to desire sex with his wife purely for his own physical pleasure. That he should never “sexually objectify” his wife and view her as an object for his sexual use and pleasure. They teach this as part of their larger belief that we should never want anything for ourselves, but instead we should only be looking to do good things for others.

They base this false teaching on a misinterpretation and misapplication of Bible passages like Philippians 2:4 which states “Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others”. The problem is that they ignore a very important word in that verse and that word is “also”. There is absolutely no sin in a person seeking to meet their own needs or even their own desires as long as they also consider the needs and desires others.

The truth that may shock many Christian readers is that God actually encourages men to use their wife’s body to meet their sexual thirsts.

In Romans 1:26-27 we read the following:

“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet”.

God uses different language for sex when it comes men and women. In the context of homosexuality, God says that women “change the natural use into that which is against nature”.

So, what is “the natural use” which Romans 1:26 refers to? We find out in the very next verse. In Romans 1:27 we are told that the natural use refers to “men, leaving the natural use of the woman”. In other words, women were created for man’s sexual use.

If we turn back to the Old Testament, we see God elaborating on this purpose of woman, to be used for man’s sexual pleasure. In Proverbs 5:15 we read “Drink waters out of thine own cistern, and running waters out of thine own well”. In this passage God compares a man’s sexual desire for woman to the human thirst for water. In other words, God is saying sex is a very important need for a man. And God has given men their wives’ bodies to meet their sexual thirst.

But later in the same passage of Scripture we read in Proverbs 5:18-19:

“Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love”.

Between Romans 1:27, Proverbs 5:15 and then Proverbs 5:18-19 we see that what the church teaches men they should want from sex today is WRONG. When they condemn husbands for wanting to use their wife’s body for their own sexual pleasure they do so in direct contradiction to the written Word of God.

If you are a man reading this and you desire to satisfy yourself with your wife’s body, to drink your fill of it and to use it for your own pleasure – there is no sin in this desire. But rather this desire is holy and part of God’s design of your masculine nature. You may have been raised your whole life to be ashamed of such desires. But I implore you based upon the clear teachings of the Bible, that you leave your shame behind and fully embrace the God created desires in you that you have toward woman.

Got Questions Ministries #fundie gotquestions.org

Question: "Is there an argument for the existence of God?"

Answer: The question of whether there is a conclusive argument for the existence of God has been debated throughout history, with exceedingly intelligent people taking both sides of the dispute. In recent times, arguments against the possibility of God’s existence have taken on a militant spirit that accuses anyone daring to believe in God as being delusional and irrational. Karl Marx asserted that anyone believing in God must have a mental disorder that caused invalid thinking. The psychiatrist Sigmund Freud wrote that a person who believed in a Creator God was delusional and only held those beliefs due to a “wish-fulfillment” factor that produced what Freud considered to be an unjustifiable position. The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche bluntly said that faith equates to not wanting to know what is true. The voices of these three figures from history (along with others) are simply now parroted by a new generation of atheists who claim that a belief in God is intellectually unwarranted.

Is this truly the case? Is belief in God a rationally unacceptable position to hold? Is there a logical and reasonable argument for the existence of God? Outside of referencing the Bible, can a case for the existence of God be made that refutes the positions of both the old and new atheists and gives sufficient warrant for believing in a Creator? The answer is, yes, it can. Moreover, in demonstrating the validity of an argument for the existence of God, the case for atheism is shown to be intellectually weak.

To make an argument for the existence of God, we must start by asking the right questions. We begin with the most basic metaphysical question: “Why do we have something rather than nothing at all?” This is the basic question of existence—why are we here; why is the earth here; why is the universe here rather than nothing? Commenting on this point, one theologian has said, “In one sense man does not ask the question about God, his very existence raises the question about God.”

In considering this question, there are four possible answers to why we have something rather than nothing at all:

1. Reality is an illusion.
2. Reality is/was self-created.
3. Reality is self-existent (eternal).
4. Reality was created by something that is self-existent.

So, which is the most plausible solution? Let’s begin with reality being simply an illusion, which is what a number of Eastern religions believe. This option was ruled out centuries ago by the philosopher Rene Descartes who is famous for the statement, “I think, therefore I am.” Descartes, a mathematician, argued that if he is thinking, then he must “be.” In other words, “I think, therefore I am not an illusion.” Illusions require something experiencing the illusion, and moreover, you cannot doubt the existence of yourself without proving your existence; it is a self-defeating argument. So the possibility of reality being an illusion is eliminated.

Next is the option of reality being self-created. When we study philosophy, we learn of “analytically false” statements, which means they are false by definition. The possibility of reality being self-created is one of those types of statements for the simple reason that something cannot be prior to itself. If you created yourself, then you must have existed prior to you creating yourself, but that simply cannot be. In evolution this is sometimes referred to as “spontaneous generation” —something coming from nothing—a position that few, if any, reasonable people hold to anymore simply because you cannot get something from nothing. Even the atheist David Hume said, “I never asserted so absurd a proposition as that anything might arise without a cause.” Since something cannot come from nothing, the alternative of reality being self-created is ruled out.

Now we are left with only two choices—an eternal reality or reality being created by something that is eternal: an eternal universe or an eternal Creator. The 18th-century theologian Jonathan Edwards summed up this crossroads:

• Something exists.
• Nothing cannot create something.
• Therefore, a necessary and eternal “something” exists.

Notice that we must go back to an eternal “something.” The atheist who derides the believer in God for believing in an eternal Creator must turn around and embrace an eternal universe; it is the only other door he can choose. But the question now is, where does the evidence lead? Does the evidence point to matter before mind or mind before matter?

To date, all key scientific and philosophical evidence points away from an eternal universe and toward an eternal Creator. From a scientific standpoint, honest scientists admit the universe had a beginning, and whatever has a beginning is not eternal. In other words, whatever has a beginning has a cause, and if the universe had a beginning, it had a cause. The fact that the universe had a beginning is underscored by evidence such as the second law of thermodynamics, the radiation echo of the big bang discovered in the early 1900s, the fact that the universe is expanding and can be traced back to a singular beginning, and Einstein’s theory of relativity. All prove the universe is not eternal.

Further, the laws that surround causation speak against the universe being the ultimate cause of all we know for this simple fact: an effect must resemble its cause. This being true, no atheist can explain how an impersonal, purposeless, meaningless, and amoral universe accidentally created beings (us) who are full of personality and obsessed with purpose, meaning, and morals. Such a thing, from a causation standpoint, completely refutes the idea of a natural universe birthing everything that exists. So in the end, the concept of an eternal universe is eliminated.

Philosopher J. S. Mill (not a Christian) summed up where we have now come to: “It is self-evident that only Mind can create mind.” The only rational and reasonable conclusion is that an eternal Creator is the one who is responsible for reality as we know it. Or to put it in a logical set of statements:

• Something exists.
• You do not get something from nothing.
• Therefore a necessary and eternal “something” exists.
• The only two options are an eternal universe and an eternal Creator.
• Science and philosophy have disproven the concept of an eternal universe.
• Therefore, an eternal Creator exists.

Former atheist Lee Strobel, who arrived at this end result many years ago, has commented, “Essentially, I realized that to stay an atheist, I would have to believe that nothing produces everything; non-life produces life; randomness produces fine-tuning; chaos produces information; unconsciousness produces consciousness; and non-reason produces reason. Those leaps of faith were simply too big for me to take, especially in light of the affirmative case for God's existence … In other words, in my assessment the Christian worldview accounted for the totality of the evidence much better than the atheistic worldview.”

But the next question we must tackle is this: if an eternal Creator exists (and we have shown that He does), what kind of Creator is He? Can we infer things about Him from what He created? In other words, can we understand the cause by its effects? The answer to this is yes, we can, with the following characteristics being surmised:

• He must be supernatural in nature (as He created time and space).
• He must be powerful (exceedingly).
• He must be eternal (self-existent).
• He must be omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it).
• He must be timeless and changeless (He created time).
• He must be immaterial because He transcends space/physical.
• He must be personal (the impersonal cannot create personality).
• He must be infinite and singular as you cannot have two infinites.
• He must be diverse yet have unity as unity and diversity exist in nature.
• He must be intelligent (supremely). Only cognitive being can produce cognitive being.
• He must be purposeful as He deliberately created everything.
• He must be moral (no moral law can be had without a giver).
• He must be caring (or no moral laws would have been given).

These things being true, we now ask if any religion in the world describes such a Creator. The answer to this is yes: the God of the Bible fits this profile perfectly. He is supernatural (Genesis 1:1), powerful (Jeremiah 32:17), eternal (Psalm 90:2), omnipresent (Psalm 139:7), timeless/changeless (Malachi 3:6), immaterial (John 5:24), personal (Genesis 3:9), necessary (Colossians 1:17), infinite/singular (Jeremiah 23:24, Deuteronomy 6:4), diverse yet with unity (Matthew 28:19), intelligent (Psalm 147:4-5), purposeful (Jeremiah 29:11), moral (Daniel 9:14), and caring (1 Peter 5:6-7).

One last subject to address on the matter of God’s existence is the matter of how justifiable the atheist’s position actually is. Since the atheist asserts the believer’s position is unsound, it is only reasonable to turn the question around and aim it squarely back at him. The first thing to understand is that the claim the atheist makes—“no god,” which is what “atheist” means—is an untenable position to hold from a philosophical standpoint. As legal scholar and philosopher Mortimer Adler says, “An affirmative existential proposition can be proved, but a negative existential proposition—one that denies the existence of something—cannot be proved.” For example, someone may claim that a red eagle exists and someone else may assert that red eagles do not exist. The former only needs to find a single red eagle to prove his assertion. But the latter must comb the entire universe and literally be in every place at once to ensure he has not missed a red eagle somewhere and at some time, which is impossible to do. This is why intellectually honest atheists will admit they cannot prove God does not exist.

Next, it is important to understand the issue that surrounds the seriousness of truth claims that are made and the amount of evidence required to warrant certain conclusions. For example, if someone puts two containers of lemonade in front of you and says that one may be more tart than the other, since the consequences of getting the more tart drink would not be serious, you would not require a large amount of evidence in order to make your choice. However, if to one cup the host added sweetener but to the other he introduced rat poison, then you would want to have quite a bit of evidence before you made your choice.

This is where a person sits when deciding between atheism and belief in God. Since belief in atheism could possibly result in irreparable and eternal consequences, it would seem that the atheist should be mandated to produce weighty and overriding evidence to support his position, but he cannot. Atheism simply cannot meet the test for evidence for the seriousness of the charge it makes. Instead, the atheist and those whom he convinces of his position slide into eternity with their fingers crossed and hope they do not find the unpleasant truth that eternity does indeed exist. As Mortimer Adler says, “More consequences for life and action follow from the affirmation or denial of God than from any other basic question.”

So does belief in God have intellectual warrant? Is there a rational, logical, and reasonable argument for the existence of God? Absolutely. While atheists such as Freud claim that those believing in God have a wish-fulfillment desire, perhaps it is Freud and his followers who actually suffer from wish-fulfillment: the hope and wish that there is no God, no accountability, and therefore no judgment. But refuting Freud is the God of the Bible who affirms His existence and the fact that a judgment is indeed coming for those who know within themselves the truth that He exists but suppress that truth (Romans 1:20). But for those who respond to the evidence that a Creator does indeed exist, He offers the way of salvation that has been accomplished through His Son, Jesus Christ: "But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God" (John 1:12-13).

Fell #fundie forums.spacebattles.com

[ Why is rape considered evil?]

A variety of factors. Part of it is reasonable, modern female empowerment. Part of it is ancient, outmoded "Sacred Feminine" bullshit. Yet another part is even more outmoded, frankly offensive 'Sacred virginity' tradition.


I really, really hate this discussion, because my opinion on it makes it seem like I hate women or something, and I really don't. But I don't think rape is nearly as heinous a crime as people think it is. It's awful, certainly, but for some reason we've elevated it to one of the worst things a person can do, and I think that reputation that it has ends up making it's victims suffer more than if it were considered only slightly worse than normal assault.

[So you see it as society trying to make a crime especially heinous because society says it is a especially heinous crime?]

Basically, yes. I think it persists via cultural inertia going back a long, long time. The reasoning behind it has changed, but the cultural meme has remained largely the same. For whatever reason, we've essentially declared vaginas sacred and we see those who "Desecrate" them as a special kind of evil; it's the kind of emotional response we usually reserve for people who hurt children, or who torture people.

I honestly think it's a sexist idea. That women are these precious, fragile jewels that need harsh laws and big strong men to protect their sacred genitalia.


Yes, rape is absolutely wrong. But the degree of emotional response we have for it is completely out of proportion to the actual severity of the violation. And I think it hurts women.

[How many people suffer life long psychological trauma from getting punched or kicked a few times?]


I imagine if you were told your entire life that punching you in the face was the most awful act anyone could do to you, you'd find it pretty traumatic if you ended up getting punched in the face.

You're also missing the point; there are many different situations in which rape is entirely non-traumatic. A date rape victim could go their entire life not knowing they'd ever been raped, but if they found out about it, it's still treated with as much vitriol as if they'd been bludgeoned, held down, and violated in the street.


[Your inflicting pain and suffering on some one for a sex /power kick.
You can't come up with any justification for it.]

And all the various kinds of rape where the victim doesn't suffer, and may in fact be entirely unaware of what happened?

Granted it'd be hard to justify those either, but not all rape is sadistic, or violent. It's a generalization people have made for some reason.

The most common drugs used in these assaults cause either complete unconsciousness or anterograde amnesia. Plenty of date rapists use lubrication and condoms, and even if they don't, the suffering of the victim is clearly not their intended goal, or they'd have left them conscious.

It's just moronic to assume that every rape MUST be motivated by sadism and power fantasies.


[So date raping someone is a less severe crime because they don't remember it?

That's some quality bullshit right there.]

that depends entirely on your own view of how justice is supposed to work.

As a sometime utilitarian, I think Justice is supposed to punish people with a severity scaled linearly to how much suffering they cause. If nobody actually suffers as a result of your crime, it isn't a very severe crime in my eyes.


[Please tell someone who suffered date rape that they didn't really suffer. Then let me know how that went for you.]

Anecdotes aren't evidence, this argument is not, has never been, and will never be persuasive. I'd also argue that they wouldn't suffer near as much if we didn't treat their vaginas like the arc of the covenant.

The fact of the matter is, if nobody told them, they'd go on with their lives without a worry in the world. They would be completely unharmed by the experience right up until the moment you chose to hurt them by giving them the knowledge of what had happened.

[Forcing someone down and raping or sodomizing them against their will, possibly giving them a disease in the process that could change how they live for the rest of their life, violating a person's privacy and body for simple physical pleasure is just sick.]

So I must ask, again, what about nonviolent rape with lubrication and protection?


[Fell, what is your suggested position on the punishment of someone who has been convicted of drugging women for the purpose of having sex with them while they are unconscious?]


It should directly correspond to the suffering, inconvenience, and loss of security felt by the victim. As a general rule of thumb; more than groping someone, less than sexually assaulting them while they're fully awake and aware.

Harry #fundie angryharry.com

Imagine, for the moment, that tomorrow morning you - a man - woke up to find that some unholy menstrual gas had escaped into the ether, and that, henceforth, most women only fancied lesbians. All of a sudden, your hopes and dreams of getting it together with a decent woman would be completely thwarted.

And if no woman thereafter ever even considered you to be a welcome intimate prospect, it would drive you insane!

And you would also be furious at those lesbian women who were getting their greedy hands on all the goodies.

Your goodies.

Up and down the street they would parade themselves with their girlfriends and their womenfolk hanging on to their arms - but you have no chance at all.

You would envy those lesbian women, and you would hate them for persistently luring away from you all those lovely women whom you desire so strongly - and so often!

And so you would do your best to undermine the standing of those lesbian women, and you would try to demonise them as best as you could, in the hope that women might be turned away from them, and instead start being attracted to you.

And I also imagine that this would be especially true on days like Valentine's Day, when no romantic card popped through your front door, and you felt particularly lonely and unwanted.

Well, this is the situation in which many lesbians do, in fact, find themselves.

There are all these gorgeous heterosexual women around the place, but they have no interest in them.

Nope. They are just not interested.

"We want a penis," they will say. "Vaginas just will not do."

They are jealous. They are envious. They are sexually frustrated.

And, in my view, this is why so much of the hatred towards men is fuelled by lesbian woman. They are jealous. They are envious. They are sexually frustrated. And they are angry; because men get a zillion times more access to those gorgeous heterosexual women whom they so desperately want for themselves.

And it is precisely because there are not enough women who are lesbian for them that these particular lesbians also sneak their way into places like domestic violence shelters which are packed full of women who are currently alleging abuse. They are always trying to wheedle their way closer to those women who might seem as if they could be particularly easy to 'turn'.

"That was an awful experience. Men are terrible. Here, hold my hand," they will tell them.

"Men are abusive and disgusting. Here, let me put my hand upon your knee."

"A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. So, show me your sweet little triangle and I'll show you mine."

Yep: This is what is going on out there.

Oh Angry Harry. You are such a fool. You don't really believe that many lesbians hate men and so try to drive a wedge between men and women simply because they are jealous, envious and sexually frustrated, do you?

Yes.

I do.

Just imagine what it would be like for heterosexual men if just about every woman whom they ever wanted to be with had absolutely no interest in them because they were attracted only to lesbians. Many men would probably do exactly what many of these particularly hateful lesbian 'feminists' are, in fact, doing. They would do their best to turn women against lesbians, and they would also hate lesbians.

Well, isn't this the very sort of thing that seems to be going on?

And did we not see a similar thing happening when blacks and whites first started intermingling their private parts

And did we not see a similar thing happening when blacks and whites first started intermingling their private parts in significant numbers some years ago? There was some resentment on both sides of the fence.

And how else would you account for the fact that a very high relative percentage of the 'feminists' who blatantly stir up hatred towards men are, indeed, lesbians?

Why is it that those who know the least about men are so hateful towards them?

Why is it that those who can most happily avoid all intimate relationships with men feel so impelled to damn them?

How is it that those people who know the least about men seem to attack them the most?

There is only one answer, in my view, that fits the evidence.

they hate men for attracting away from their clutches the very women whom they, themselves, desire.

And this is that these particular lesbian women are jealous, envious and sexually frustrated, and they hate men for attracting away from their clutches the very women whom they, themselves, desire. And they also attempt to gain access to more women both by seeking out those who are currently angry with men and, hence, who will likely more easily be seduced by them, and by trying to demonise men in the eyes of all heterosexual women in order to encourage more of them to give up on men.

Well, that's my opinion!

drkresearch #conspiracy nodisinfo.com

Arizona Highway Shooting is a Ridiculous Arch Zionist Gun Control Hoax

In what is a most obvious hoax the arch-Zionist DHS has committed yet another scam, attempting to convince the world that a fake is actually real.

Regardless, it is an obvious hoax, which the numerology alone gives full proof of. Sure it was, 11 cars were shot. Tben, too, an arrest was made on September 11. This is an act of the criminally minded arch-Zionists, make no mistake about it. Consider this element, for instance, per the DailyMail:

A judge ordered the release on Friday of 19-year-old Oscar De La Torre Munoz (above), who was detained at a convenience store September 11 and questioned regarding the shootings.

Sure it is, Sept. 11, with 11 vehicles plus a father that is obviously acting. It’s just a bunch of actors and arch-fakes. It’s the same story of DHS-0rchestrated destruction of property to create a semblance of realism. The purported victims or potential victims are fabricators, just as are the supposedly concerned relatives.

The supposed gunman is a nobody. Perhaps he had a record. Perhaps a deal was made. He is obviously faking it, as is everyone else, including the judge, court agents, police chief, and all others.

Yet, who will dispute the arch-lies? The vulnerable, gullible goy will take it largely wholesale, saying, essentially, “It’s just another white racist wing-nut, who is responsible.”

If it were not for the goy, so gullible, so readily bamboozled; what would the world, then, be? Jewry believes that anything can be done to them, especially through the commission of treachery. They will accept it. They will hold it as real. “How could they lie about this? Surely, there is no reason, no motive, to do so.” Who are “they” anyway?

george00,SINCERITY.net #racist 4racism.org

Wally Wally:
(from amren: “james-watson-wont-stop-talking-about-race” story)

The trouble is that about 65% of whites and about 99% of blacks will hear what Mary-Claire King said and think that it's a good argument against what Watson said even thought it has absolutely nothing to do with what Watson said. And another thing, why would any logical white person, who wants the white race to survive, want the average black IQ to be equal to the average white I

Fact: average American black IQ is 15 pts lower than average American white IQ. However, individually, there are many blacks who are a lot smarter than whites and vice versa. Furthermore, most blacks in America have sufficient intelligence to live productive lives, no different than a broad segment of whites who have ordinary IQ levels.

Perhaps you could explain, why disparate average IQ levels between American blacks and whites is SO important to you and your race realist brethren?

george00:
What a fantastic question but do you really need to ask? I give you exhibit A: Planet Earth. Look around it. The darker the skin of the people who predominate in any country the more poverty and crime. Don't bother with the world just limit it to the United States. The darker the skin of the people who predominate in any city and the more poverty and crime. I could go on breaking things down for you but hopefully to can see the pattern.
And yes the average black has enough intelligence to live a semi-productive life but only because he is surrounded by white people and an infrastructure invented and sustained by whites. How would this average black guy be doing in Africa? Not so well. Right?
I could answer you in another way. WLP gave an excellent talk on this subject but almost all advancements have been made by whites in the genius IQ range. If whites on a large scale interbred with nonwhites this would pull the number of whites in the genius IQ range down and grind all advancements to a halt. It's complicated.

Wally Wally:

A prevalent belief amongst race realists is: “black people aren’t smart enough to exist in 1st world societies” and “have a propensity for committing crime”. Based on this belief, they feel a segregated America should be revived. A very large number of productive blacks in America unequivocally destroys that belief. Reasonable, unbiased people of all races see blacks daily participating in the American dream.

The darker the skin of the people who predominate in any city and the more poverty and crime.

I’m a black baby boomer who grew up in Washington DC on the tail end of segregation. As was true with most cities with black populations, with the advent of integration, blacks who could afford better moved out of the cities, leaving a concentration of poor blacks. Many of the blacks that moved out now live in middle class suburban black neighborhoods. Contrary to popular (race realism)belief, cities like Washington DC have many areas that are populated with middle to upper class blacks, with poor blacks living in pockets.

And black crime: the second weapon of attack used to justify a return to segregation. “Blacks have a propensity for committing crime”, like black intelligence “facts”, it’s a “fact” unsupported by scientific research.

The bulk of crime being committed by blacks is being committed by young black males involved in drug gang violence. Young black gangsters are protecting the very lucrative profits generated by the black market enterprise: DRUGS. The same phenomena existed during prohibition when young white men were committing crime and violence against each other at exorbitant rates, protecting the very lucrative profits of that other black market enterprise: ALCOHOL. Black market enterprises that generate large sums of cash tend to attract large scale violence. Lucrative cash, not genetics, is responsible for much of the crime and violence in black communities.

And yes the average black has enough intelligence to live a semi-productive life but only because he is surrounded by white people and an infrastructure invented and sustained by whites.

Semi-productive? The average black has enough intelligence to live a productive life, no different than the average white. Race realists like to push the myth of – most whites being intelligent enough to invent the marvelous technologies we enjoy – but the truth of the matter is, most whites are quite ordinary when it comes to IQ, as capable of sustaining a society as most blacks and would be lost too if forced to sustain their surroundings. You race realists live vicariously through the achievements of your more talented brethren(whose numbers are relatively small in number).

SINCERITY.net:
First I repeat, I would rather see the discussion on the top where I opened the same topic. This discussion here is buried very low, nobody will find it.
WallyWally, do you understand the scientific method? Most anti-racists keep making unproven statement and guesses. If you say what is PC you can make unproven statements or prove them with pseudoscience. Have you read Richard Lynn's books like "IQ and the wealth of Nations" who has clearly proven the statement that the darker the skin the lower the average income and gross national product of countries and regions
A few middle class blacks, who run away from their lower IQ high crime brothers to hide in white/Asian neighborhoods or the rare black middlle class region don't fix black AVERAGES of crime, school dysfuncion, and welfare.
Als WallyWally, be honest. Like Obama, and Sottomayor, you probably benefitted from a life of constant affirmative action. Even the vote for Obama was mostly BECAUSE of his skin color.
Again, I suggest we continue the conversation above on the new post that I started
By the way, read Sincerity.net

Wally Wally:
Middle class blacks are no different than middle class whites when they choose to purchase homes in middle class neighborhoods, black or white. Middle class whites don’t purchase homes in poor white Appalachian neighborhoods, they purchase homes in middle class neighborhoods. Why should our(black) purchasing strategy be different than yours(white)?

The bulk of crime in inner city neighborhoods is mainly driven by black market forces: DRUGS in particular, the same black market forces that drove white prohibition era crime. The high crime rates are certainly not a result of a 15 point difference in average IQ between blacks and whites.

Your(race realist) claim: “lower IQ is responsible for the education gap between blacks and whites”, is unproven and nonsensical given there are more plausible explanations for the gap. How much IQ horsepower is needed to sufficiently master the K – 12 education curriculum? Unless you know the answer to that question, you can’t begin to make your claim regarding IQ and the education gap. Poor parenting(single, barely of age, mothers), violence infested neighborhoods, the misguided distructive belief: “studying is ‘acting white’, are much more plausible explanations for the educational failures in inner city neighborhoods.

george00: An ordinary IQ for whites is 100. An ordinary IQ for blacks is 85. Whites are much more capable of sustaining a society than blacks. Most whites plan their lives around avoiding blacks. That's why there's white flight. The reason for white flight is pretty much illustrated by the type of conversation we are having right now. I'll say something and then you completely don't grasp the implications of what I just said. There's a reason why blacks create s---hole countries and cities and neighborhoods and schools. There's a reason why nonwhites are risking everything and doing everything to get into white countries on a massive scale. White geniuses make advances that are sustained by average whites. Blacks have demonstrated that they are incapable of sustaining even basic white standards. Look at what happens to the white colonies of Africa after the whites leave. You have nothing to base your arguments on except there are a lot of blacks who are being productive at jobs they got from whites after they rioted and burned the cities down in a massive symbolic strong armed robbery maneuver. That's your argument and it sucks.

Wally Wally: . I'll say something and then you completely don't grasp the implications of what I just said.

You make claims (e.g. – “Blacks have demonstrated that they are incapable of sustaining even basic white standards”.) for which there are glaring counter examples for refutation. It’s hard to take race realism seriously when you engage in constant hyperbolic propaganda.

george00: You keep wanting to take what blacks do when the blacks are sustained by whites. White people are employing blacks. It's a matter of frequency. The frequency of examples supporting your claims are much lower than the frequency of the examples supporting my claims. Blacks are parasites on whites. Whites would be much better off without blacks and blacks would be much worse off without whites.

triedtoconvince #sexist #racist reddit.com

So, I am a very long time lurker. Someone once told me something about the gender divide issue. I believe that this is the solution for Asian men. It is a method that looks in the long term. Yes, improve ourselves in matters such as the physical (lift weights, play sports, train in the martial arts - mixed martial arts), and in the mental (stay mentally healthy, work on your intellect, do well in school). However, improving ourselves only goes so far.

There is what many people here are now doing - calling out Hollywood/western racism, beginning to support leaders such as Duterte who call out white supremacy, imperialism, white attacks on other races as what they are, and finally creation of anti-Propaganda such as Kulture, which is very respectable.

However, these two prongs of counterattack only solve part of the problem, because in the vast majority of cases from my experience, it is not entirely brainwashing or Asian men "not being masculine enough" that is the problem. (I have seen too many examples of masculine Asian men who also have charisma be considered as much more inferior than they really are compared to other men, simply because they are Asian, this is the females' fault, not Asian man's fault, this is society's fault, not our fault. Women are the ones who control the gates to relatinoships and sex, so whether we are chosen or not is not our fault, especially when all factors are against us, and our most attractive/masculine specimen are considered inferior to the lowest of other races of men).

You see, many Asian women are complicit. completely complicit. I would estimate that at least half of them or 75% are enamored with white men and have a much higher disposition than other races of women for stockholm syndrome. They truly hate anything to do with the Asian men. And another maybe 25% or 20% think the same way (love whites), but either have not acted yet on getting themselves a white/black/nonAsian male, or are quiet about it, or pretend to support Asian men but in reality sleep with the enemy (Constance Wu).

There are simply not enough Asian women who are truly loyal to Asian men for this not to become a major problem in the future for our race. Our race will die out if we do nothing. Do not be complacent like many stupid Asians or mainland Chinese who believe that China's size will simply absorb these things. Asian men are being cucked in their own countries now, even when they are the vast majority. Imagine what happens if there is some kind of immigration, and add onto this the fact that many Asian women look for foreign/non-Asian men and many refuse to have children with Asian men.

The solution is not to take Asian women back as bananarangs, nor is it to try to "convert them back." What is lost is lost.

Asian men must look to the future, look forward, and not backward. There is nothing to look back to except the smouldering ruins of a once great city that Asian men and women once built together. And the ones responsible for burning down the city were mostly Asian women, with the help and encouragement of white males, non-Asian males who dislike Asian men, and cuckold Asian men/eunuchs.

We the surviving Asian men can no longer afford to be distracted by Asian women. They only drag us down, or they cause us psychological pain. It is time to separate ourselves from them, as they chose to separate themselves from us and throw us under the train to be killed. They are not worth the effort in any way shape or form. It is a complete waste of time and mental energy to think about them or even to hate them. Simply all Asian men must forget about Asian women and act as if they do not exist. There is a world of women out there for us if we are aggressive enough, bold enough, confident enough.

The problem of the Asian population disappearing is actually not that big of a problem if Asian men take action. This action is the solution to the problem: as many Asian men as possible must pursue non-Asian women and have offspring with them. Then, ensure you have many daughters that you teach to love only Asian men (have them ONLY watch Asian TV shows with Asian male romantic leads, and also steer them toward more masculine Asian male portrayals such as those of Jang Hyuk or Lee Byung Hun or Oh Ji Ho or Toshiro Mifune or Huang Xiao Ming.... you get the picture, let them see the Chinese weightlifters and Japanese/Chinese/Korean male gymnastic team full of muscular, baddass, masculine Asian men, influence them to fall in love with Asian men only, sure throw in the flower/pretty boy drama once in a while, but keep things traditionally Asian masculine).

There will be many Asian men out there with very few options in the future, as this racism will only continue and get worse. So, when your half Asian daughters marry fully Asian men the next generation or half a generation down the line, we will have a huge population of 3/4ths Asians with Asian fathers and Asian grandfathers. This cycle can be repeated over and over again. We are essentially creating a bloodline..... no, a NATION of Asian male genetics and non-Asian female genetics, in which the Asian genetics and Asian phenotype will dominate and everyone is something like 3/4ths Asian with Asian patriarchal ancestry.

This is not unlike what happened in Central Asia after Genghis Khan swept into the west. Except that we will have this objective in mind as a way to preserve the Asian man's genetics, and to fight back against white supremacy and western imperialism. Genghis Khans descendants also often ended up very caucasoid, so that is another difference.

You might say "hey tridetoconvince this is a good plan of action, but I bet you are a loser who masturbates at home and doesnt even have a girlfriend."

Nope, I have a fiancee, and she is part Iranian, part eastern european, and very beautiful compared to the kind of American white woman or Asian woman I would be able to match up with if I were to try here in the states. You see, I realized that it does not matter how much Asian men try with racist Asian or white/American women, because even an 8/10 Asian guy like myself will be considered half his attractiveness rating due to all the factors, especially social proof and media-related, that are against us. This is why Asian men must forget about the vast majority of Asian women, and also only use the racist/racist-leaning white American women as nothing more than casuals. Those of us who live outside of the USA or anglo controlled areas should maximize our opportunities with women who are into Asian media and not as much influenced by western/Hollywood media, because these women are the ones that can really view us in a more objective manner, and I can attest that they are much more open and judge us as individuals as opposed to how we are treated in white/western/anglo heavy areas.

This doesn't mean a loser, ugly Asian guy who puts no effort into his looks or musculature will be able to do well. A loser is still a loser, so for those bros, they need to self improve first before taking action.

The most vital part of this plan is to make sure that our daughters are exclusively attracted to Asian men, and that will take a lot of effort making sure they completely avoid the toxic white/western media that dehumanizes all Asian men and paints us as losers, eunuchs, cuckolds, target practice, villains.

I will be doing my part in the future by making sure my daughters only like Asian men, and I will make sure to find fully Asian husbands for them.

And remember, this is what any tribe with sane male leaders would do. Whites were/are planning to do this with Asian women acting as "surrogate white women."

Dane Wigington #conspiracy geoengineeringwatch.org

Mainstream media covered the fact that Chinese scientists are engineering snowstorms, are we to believe that the US government and others aren't doing the same?

The US military is as large as the next 10 largest militaries combined, thus they have the ability to carry out climate engineering (weather warfare) operations on the largest scale by far. Not only have US military commanders stated that the disintegrating climate is the greatest national security threat, they have long since stated their objective of "owning the weather". Are we to believe that our government would ask our permission before deploying climate engineering operations? In fact, our government's own documents prove climate engineering has been ongoing for decades. The “departure from normal high temperature” map below (from Dec 29, 2017) clearly revealed where surface temperatures were cold, and where they were not.

In order to engineer an end of year cool-down for parts of the US and Canada, the flow of moisture from the Pacific (that was until recently directed completely around California) was chemically nucleated by the climate engineers. What happens when these endothermic reacting materials rain down on far above freezing bodies of water like Lake Michigan? (the majority of Lake Michigan is still at nearly 45 degrees F) Perfectly spherical ice balls form and start washing up on shorelines. The chemical nucleating elements form a nucleus around which ice continues to form.

How about all that temporary ice along the US East Coast which the media did their best to sensationalize? Did anyone bother to check the ocean temperatures?

Why is so much ice forming on ocean waters that are 40 degrees F or higher? This fact should also be remembered and considered, sea water does not freeze until it reaches 28.4 degrees F. “Slush Waves” were also recorded along the coast near Boston, why are no official sources questioning this? Why are no official sources offering any reasonable explanations for such a phenomenon when ocean temperatures are 40 degrees F or higher? The answer is because they are not allowed to tell the truth. The illegal federal gag order on all National Weather Service (NWS) and all National Oceanic and Atmospheric (NOAA) employees should be a glaring red flag. Surface ice storms are also now a constant threat due to the chemical ice nucleating elements reaching the surface before solidifying.

How warm is the East Coast scheduled to get after the engineered weather whiplash cool-down passes? The “departure from normal high temperature” map below paints a shocking picture of East Coast warmth (in close proximity to a chemically nucleated cold zone in the center of the US) that was scheduled to follow on the heals of the media hyped (and completely engineered) “winter storms”. Will the geoengineers be able to alter the outcome of this "forecast" with yet another engineered cooldown? Winter storm “Hunter” is the next theatrically named creation of the climate engineers that will follow the temporary weather whiplash warm-up.

The top 3 superpowers (USA, China, and Russia) have the largest militaries, and thus the greatest ability to effect the climate with their ongoing chemical ice nucleation cool-down operations. It is important to remember and consider that the majority of nations are either actively or passively participating in the global climate intervention programs. Comparing the more recent scheduled temperature anomaly forecast map below with the map shown earlier in this post reveals a number of profound weather whiplash changes occurring in the space of only a few days. Greenland has gone from far below normal surface temperatures back to far above normal temperatures, the eastern US has done the same. Conversely, portions of Russia and China have done the opposite, going from far above normal to below normal. The geoengineered winter weather whiplash scenarios will continue to worsen rapidly, patented chemical ice nucleation processes are a primary factor. It must be remembered and considered that all "predictions" (scheduled weather) are in a state of constant flux. So much depends on what the climate engineers choose to do (or not to do) at any given window of time.

Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D. #fundie disqus.com

Wyatt O'Keefe:

It is important to keep in the mind the Biblical principles relative to the status of the female within the Godly scheme of things. The female was created for the male. Not for herself! Therefore, the Christian Bible keeps things consistent in that when it talks about a male, it often implies that his female is there with him. It is a simple logical syllogism that when talking of the male of a particular kind of an animal, our Bible implies that his female was there with him.

Just as important is to analyze this scientifically. Relative to the command to take seven pairs of clean animals onto the Ark, I have discussed this matter with the utmost esteemed baraminologist, Dr. Todd Elder. He enlightened me regards to a bird called Laysan duck, which went almost extinct in Hawaii, up to where there were only seven adults left. But this duck managed to recover, and now the population numbers in the 100s. In fact, soon Christians may be able to go duck hunting when vacationing on Hawaii! Why does this matter? Simple: because it refutes the evilutionist lies that such population is not enough for "genetic diversity" needed to multiply a whole kind of an animal!

As we know, the Earth was created for the humans. Therefore, it was important that every kind of the clean animal recovered to a healthy stock after the flood so that the people would have their food. The unclean animals didn't really matter, therefore, two pairs of each kind were enough. Because it would not have mattered if some tiger or toad didn't recover to a healthy stock or died off, since the people did not need these animals in the first place! Isn't it great how our Bible is not only spiritually, but also scientifically, true?!

In the name of our Savior,
Brother T

Gene #racist worldmagblog.com

We need to change some of our laws regarding illegal immigrants.

1. No schooling - children of illegal immigrants should not be allowed into our schools period. Every child should have to show proof of US citizenship before they can enroll in school.

2. No citizenship just because you are born on US soil. If an illegal immigrant has a child in the USA the child should also be considered illegal. Only a child who's parents are legal US citizens should they be granted citizenship.

3. No healthcare for illegals. If an illegal is sick, needs emergency care, or is dying, put them on a bus and drop them over the border. Let Mexico build a hospital on the border to care for them. But illegal immigrants should not ba allowed any medical care whatsoever in America.

4. No transfer of money to Mexico. The US government should prohibit the tranfer of any money to Mexico via electronic or paper transfer. Every Mexican that's exiting the US for Mexico should have their money confiscated at the border. If we cut off their ability to send money back to Mexico the illegals will leave.

5. No water barrels or feeding stations on the border. It should be a federal offense to give food, water, or any other type of aid to illegals. If enough of them die from thirst or hunger it will discourage others from coming. Make the conditions as bleak and harsh as possible. Churches and other non-profits should be required to report illegals just as they're required to report child abusers. If Christians want to help Mexicans, let them set up a ministry in Mexico.

6. Arm the border with the US military. If necessary, plant land mines. Use machine gun towers. Institute a "shoot to kill" policy for anyone trying to sneak across the border. Once a few Mexicans are knocked off the flood of illegals will be reduced to a trickle.

If we don't stop the brown horde from invading our country America will lose it's cultural and religious heritage. God bless the Minutemen who are working to defend our borders!