Similar posts

some TERFs #sexist reddit.com

Re: On how the only aspects of "womanhood" that are valued are the ones males can buy into

image

(lacubana)
Yesssss thissssss

Wanna know when I felt most “like a woman”? I can tell you I sure wasn’t wearing makeup or heels or having a pillow fight. I wasn’t delicate in the slightest.

It was when I was pushing another human I had made out of my body. Oh yeah that.

(earthgarden)
and if you're not pushing a human out, or in the process of growing a human, you get a monthly reminder by your body (for at least 4 f!cking decades of your life!) that it had to tear down the nest it built just in case you set one to growing. I swear to god!! If men could experience a period ONCE they would leave us TF alone! That would be an end to the oppression because their pity would know no bounds, they'd experience massive shame at the treatment men have inflicted upon female humanity these long millennia. because then they'd realize nature already oppresses us just fine, thank you very much

(LadyCeer)
My dad used to be really sweet about it and let me sleep a lot and he fed me eggs and ibuprofen and was just very kind when I was being shot down by my period. He also used to talk to women in the form of long, friendly, non-sexual conversations....But then, he never tried to become a woman. Maybe that's a connection.

(shortstroll)
I don't know about your theory but I think it's one of two options.

The first is that some of them are just gay men who in their formative years internalised gender roles. So since they like clothes, have a crush on a dude and their penis isnt a major erogenous zones they think they are girls. It's also sub conscious sexual strategy. There's a greater selection of partners for them if they can fake being a woman. In fact you now see them pushing the idea that genuine heterosexual males would knowingly copulate with a tim.

The second is that some of them are straight men who just have a weird fetishism of womanhood. They don't just want to have sex with women, they want to be them. This isn't dissimilar from the cannibals who get sexual gratification from eating their sexual partners. Bruce Jenner is the perfect example of this. He slowly turned himself into a male version of his wife and the closer he got to his goal the greater his resentment of her grew. Once he had completed his transition, he didn't just discard her, he tried to destroy her in the media. I'm convinced that in a different world, he would have murdered her. That would have been his version of a perfect conclusion.

(TerribleConfusion)
I saw Graham Linehan retweeted a man suggesting something similar. It’s hard to empathise with this, as a woman, but it seemed to make sense to him and the other guy. And I suppose when you think about it, a lot of men do get INCREDIBLY uncomfortable when discussing ways in which men oppress women. Even decent guys don’t want to think about it. So I can kind of imagine how that discomfort might feed in to autogynephilia. Maybe when you feel like your desire is oppressive you want to be the object of desire instead of the subject.

It’s very hard to reconcile this with how misogynistic many TIMs are, though. But I suppose maybe they feel like they’re allowed to hate and bully women because they’re “women” too, and they’re more special and oppressed than any other kind of woman blah blah etc. And maybe it’s the most misogynistic and shitty of men who are most uncomfortable with themselves deep down so they transition to escape their own shittiness. Spoiler: they don’t escape it, they just found a different method than other misogynists to project their shittiness on to (actual) women.

(witchy_xx)
actually this is the exact reason given when my ex came out as trans. he wanted to escape the role of oppressor. what a load of shit.

it's also an easy power grab. for example that asshat Hailey Heartless was a no one politically before and now everyone knows his name.

(griffxx)
We have seen TIMs along with their Handmaidens, trying to dislocate all things female, from the definition of of woman, womanhood and female. I'm truly fascinated, in a psychologically clinical way, the TIMs asserting that they have Bloodless Periods. This a whole other level of Delusion.

Why on Earth did these Feminized White Men, think they could dictate WOMEN diminished our Womanhood, for their OBSESSIVE NARCISSISTIC NEED FOR THE VALIDATION OF THEIR GENDER IDENTITIES!!!!!

The minute these Prostate Havers and their Handmaidens said point blank that, "FEMALE BIOLOGY AND THE EXPERIENCES OF LIVING IN THE BODY, HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WOMANHOOD" this Misogynistic, Homophobic and Racist Movement should have been REELED/REALED in to what it was supposed to be:

Lobbying and advocating for laws that reassert Civil Rights protections against various forms of discrimination.

They have framed as "A FIGHT FOR THEIR EXISTENCE" this is categorically A LIE.

And to make the claim there are plenty of Lesbians that will date and fuck them; Bisexual leaning women more like. If this were true the Cotton Ceiling War Against Lesbian Sexuality would have ended 5 years ago. Instead it's still continues, and we are at 7.5 year mark.

We need to build on the momentum, we currently have. We need to explain to the Civilian class of women--> not part of the Feminist or LGBTQ Communities, how White TIMs are engaged in the process of erasing their sex-based protections, in the name of attaining their Civil Rights

(scienceisarealthing)

I have no way of knowing whether most pass or not. I’ve never seen a study. All I have is anecdotal evidence.

I've seen a lot of trans-identified males in real life as well as in photo & it's very rare for them to pass. The few who do pass visually are clockable as male as soon as you hear their voice, see their body shape, or see how large their bone structure is when they are next to a female person. This is not meant as an "insult" btw, bc there's nothing wrong with being a feminine male (as long as they arent sexist, etc...)

Transmisogyny is intrinsically illogical bc either the trans-ID'd male passes as female (and experiences some forms of misogyny) or he is clocked as male & faces homophobia/ transphobia/ whatever you wanna call hatred/ disgust against gnc males. It's the reason why drunk guys will sometimes hit on a trans-ID'd male, then the moment they find out he's actually male will scream things like "Fggot! Trnny!!" and sometimes resort to physical violence. That is NOT an example of misogyny bc it wouldn't happen to a female.

How would you know you saw a trans person if they did pass though?

I've never seen a trans-ID'd male who passes in real life, only in photos. There's just no getting around the differences in bone structure, voice, and movements between males and females when you observe people in real life. As someone who is involved in the natural sciences & figure drawing, it is easy to determine someone's natal sex & tell if they are trans or not.

edit: I mean, even when you look at the transpassing sub, few pass even in photo. It does a disservice to trans people to lie to them by telling them they pass when they don't. I see women and other trans people do this all the time & it makes me cringe, because it's so obviously.. not true. In fact, it comes across as cruel to lie to someone like that. It should be ok for people to look/ dress however they want without striving for the unattainable goal of passing completely as the opposite sex.

If a trans woman passes as female, what forms of misogyny would they not face? Honest question. Is it just from medical professionals who would know about someone’s private health details? If they pass, then why would it come up in conversation?

Side question, why does it matter if someone is facing violence due to misogyny or transphobia? Why put up one more barrier between people who have similar experiences under the same system?

It is impossible to say definitively whether or not most trans women can pass based on one person’s interaction with the public. You can definitely say that you’ve seen some trans people not passing. Why would anyone reveal their medical history to a stranger?

Jesus christ, seriously? They wouldn't face:

-limited birth control access, abortion access, reproductive rights battles

-the pain of pregnancy/ discrimination against pregnant women

-dying in childbirth

-the fear of becoming pregnant

-menstrual pain/ stigma/ menstrual huts

-female genital mutilation

-femicide/ sex selective abortion

-medical stigma against female health concerns like PCOS, uterine cysts, endometriosis, severe PMS, menopause, etc... (the list goes on & on)

-sex trafficking & rape (most men want to rape females, not trans-ID'd males)

-being sold as a child bride

-limited access to education bc of being female

-breast ironing

-bride burning

-foot binding (though this only happened to females in the past, as far as i know)

I'm leaving off so much more I can't think of right now. Trans men, nonbinary females, women.. we all face these issues based on what part of the world we live in. It matters whether someone faces misogyny vs. homophobia/ transphobia because those are different forms of oppression! By your same logic, we could include men who face racism under the branch of feminism because (as you said) "Why put up one more barrier between people who have similar experiences?"

FEMinism is the only political movement that is exclusively for FEMales. It's horrible that other people face different forms of oppression, but they can form their own movements to address their needs. Black women & black men both face racism but ONLY black women are welcome in feminism. Poor men & poor women are both economically oppressed, but ONLY the poor woman is welcome in feminism. A woman & a passing trans-ID'd male may both be catcalled, but ONLY the woman is welcome in feminism.

Trans-ID'd males are welcome to (and in fact, already have) formed their own political movements against the unique problems they face. It is narcissistic and unreasonable to demand that women dismantle the ONLY political movement that we have to ourselves. Can female people seriously have nothing to ourselves?Do we have to give in to every group who wants "in"? We can be allies with each other to overcome some similar problems we may face (if any), but we are not the same, and that distinction in lived reality matters.

Isn’t feminism for anyone who believes in the social, economic, and political equality of women? Everyone is welcome. That is a great point about not including everyone who is oppressed ever, but the type of oppression we are talking about is targeted at people who present as female. What I find disturbing by your response is that you aren’t inclusive. Why do you need to say that someone is not welcome if they are experiencing something as common as cat calling or workplace harassment? Would it be so bad if a trans woman was in your circle? Would you not feel safe? I don’t understand what benefit there is to being so specific in membership? It seems to me that it would be best to differentiate by who is suffering a type of discrimination. For example, a trans woman might be subject to being talked down to in public (there is a great TEDtalk by a trans woman who knows what it is like to walk around in society as an adult male and an adult female. She passes btw). A trans male might have not had access to birth control prior to transitioning. I would think both types of people would be welcome.

Feminism is Liberation of females from male oppression. We are already equal, stating that is redundant and offensive.

Homereker #fundie homereker.tumblr.com

GIVE US OUR SAFE SPACES BACK

One of the most noteworthy things I have noticed about trans women is that they’re selfish and that they think that the entire world revolves around them.

They don’t care that women will be raped because of the new bathroom law that states that any person can choose any gendered bathroom, thus a lot of men will claim to be transgender women and gain access to the women’s bathroom. They don’t care that trans women WILL rape and already raped women in safe spaces made for women.They don’t care that convicted rapists are gaining access to women’s prisons because of the whole trans ideology. They don’t care that women are more at risk for PTSD, rape and abuse just because they want to live their lives as women.

They don’t care, and they will never acknowledge all of these things. Because then, they’d have to realize that there is a difference between them and women. They’d have to acknowledge male violence. They’d have to realize that sex-based oppression is indeed alive and well, and kills women daily.

It’s utterly disgusting and it’s why I’ll never respect them.

# feminism # radical feminism # radfem # radical feminist # liberal feminism # thoughts # trans # 100

Some TERFs #sexist reddit.com

Re: Where Does Organized Male Evil Come From?

I just got finished reading this article about the rapes of Rohingya women and the persecution and slaughter of their people: http://www.thejournal.ie/rohingya-rape-3745266-Dec2017/

I know it's not uplifting to read this stuff, but it's also important not to turn away.

I want to know what causes such organized male evil. It doesn't matter whether it's a dispute over territory or religion or ethnicity, it is men who do this in an organized fashion. It has always been men.

Is it as simple as "patriarchy?" Silvia Federici's Caliban and the Witch describes the creation of capitalist evil through the weaponization of men and male sexuality, the formal institution of patriarchy, the enslavement of women, and the colonial/imperial ventures of the new world order.

Although it's true almost no corner of the human world has gone untouched by the Western project of colonialism and imperialism, other cultures have their own ancient histories of warfare, bloodshed and male rule that predate Western history.

I know the advent of agriculture and the dawn of land ownership have been cited as the reason for growing institutionalization of patriarchy and subjugation of women and expansion of territory--but really--I struggle to understand how men can commit such horrific atrocities in an organized fashion. If women ruled the world, would we do this? Would we?

I have never given much credence to notions of biological determinism and I still don't; if men are like this by dint of nature as well as nurture the power of human socialization can change them. So far is has mainly been used to cement these violent, hierarchical tendencies it seems.

I just never used to believe there could be this fundamental difference between men and women where under the right circumstances men could join together to commit such atrocities in a way that women wouldn't. Is it because women have been stripped of their power that we don't see them band together to exercise it in such horrific fashion? Or is there really a fundamental, biological difference between us that makes men more susceptible to committing violence?

I also struggle with the connection between sex and committing violence so often seen within cultures and among mostly male individuals across the world. Is it male or is it masculine?

(anxietyaccount8)
No it's not just as simple as patriarchy. I once believed that but now I don't. Men really are just more violent than women. Male sexuality is also very different than female sexuality (in general) and I don't think anybody could have socialized me into being interested in some of the crazy things they are interested in.

I think that the reason a lot of people dismiss these claims is because they are reminded of evolutionary psychology, which for the most part is not very scientific at all. But the thing is that just because things like "women are naturally better at cooking" are BS it doesn't mean that everything that sounds like evopsych is wrong. For example we know that male and female animals act differently. We know that males and females have different body types, hormone levels, and different ways of reproducing. Would it really be so insane to suggest there are mental differences too?

Now to be fair, I am not really sure if this is true, and none of us will be sure unless we have substantial evidence, but this is my personal theory. It just feels really obvious to me.

(Unabashed_Calabash)
This was my point to another poster. To what extent can the behavior of other mammals, including our closest relatives chimpanzees and bonobos (pygmy chimpanzees) be interpreted to reflect on our own?

Not only the male correlation of sex and violence but specifically the far greater incidence of male sexual fetishes (about the same as the disproportionate ratio of male vs. female violence, 10 to 1) causes me to believe there's something more than socialization going on here. Scientists who study human sexuality say it has to do with a more intense focus from males as a group on sexuality in general, heightening fetishes. But how often do you hear of women who like to pretend to be baby boys and wear diapers? (Seriously?) And like to be burped and breastfed and rocked to sleep? (I would really like formal studies of how often these bizarre fetishes occur in males as compared to females. I wouldn't necessarily say it's a result of porn and therefore male domination arising from social reasons because how much of porn is men pretending to be infant girls and breastfeed? Please don't tell me).

I am not saying this to be in favor of gender or against it. "Gender" as we know it is a social construct. Any innate evolutionary differences in the sexes--say, of violent vs. pacifist, or systematizing (from, say, hunting more often than women in most prehistoric societies) vs. integration (from the greater social relations of gathering and building)--need not be our fate if detrimental. We are highly social animals almost entirely at the whim of our socialization, which has been civilizing in some respects but in others greatly lacking.

I agree that just because evolutionary psychology has become a crutch of sexist males it does not mean absolutely none of it is true. It's more important than ever we separate the wheat from the chaff.

(anxietyaccount8)
Right, and it's important that people recognize radical feminism's criticism of gender actually does not contradict this existence of innate differences. We are all born into a society where we have to follow prescribed gender roles, and this social construct bleeds into all aspects of our lives and causes differences of its own. If some differences are innate this social construction makes them much more prominent and worse.

Also it doesn't mean that there is a distinct male or female brain, or that trans people really do have the brain of the opposite sex. Even if, hypothetically, a trans woman did actually act in ways that women are biologically supposed to, they are just proving that there is variation and a male can be that way too.

(Unabashed_Calabash)
Lol at the downvotes. I also don't understand how butthurt men get about this subject. It is quite clearly true (unless you prefer "violence" to "evil" because you don't believe in imposing moral values on human actions), and I am merely asking why and where it comes from.

Humanity will never change until men reckon with their own and their fellow men's actions.

(bigoltreehugger)
Ew. So many men came in caping for other men in response. I miss the days when this sub didn't have as many dudes hanging around. I'm sorry I can't engage your question properly but I just wanted to say that I've always appreciated your input on this sub.

(descending_wisdom)
fundamental biological differences. Sexual selection theory easily explains male violence. Watch some videos on organized warfare in some troops of chimpanzees.

(sunscreenonface)
Gonna leave this write up from notcisjustwoman here:

"Patriarchy pre-dates both the agricultural revolution and hunter-gatherer societies, because the basis of the oppression of women, indeed the very basis for oppression itself, is rape.

Male animals have been raping female animals since before the first humans, or even the first primates, appeared on earth. Events like the agricultural revolution codified male oppression of women into a more organized system, and religion has evolved over time to become an enforcer and moralizer of male violence, but neither of things things created patriarchy. Patriarchy began the first time a man raped a woman, and instead of being beaten to death by her tribal/family group, he was rewarded with fathership of her children.

It’s not comfortable even for most radical feminists to see this full and complete scope of the history of patriarchy, because it means that things are much more complicated than mere socialization, but it is a brutal truth we must confront in our analysis."

To expand upon this, here's a previous write up I did once I'd read notcisjustwoman's blog:

"I don't think this will make anyone feel better, but I've recently been thinking a lot about the various species of animals across this earth that have been known to rape...and it turns out most animal species have some form of rape. Ducks, squirrels, dolphins, dogs, gorillas, etc. all have observable males who rape and aggress females.

I don't think it's a stretch to say that aggressive males who rape will pass on their aggressive traits to their offspring that are conceived via rape. I don't think it's a stretch to say that male homo sapiens might be more likely to aggress and rape females since they inherited a tendancy towards violence from their male ancestors who were conceived via rape. (Reminder: I could be completely wrong about this!)

Does this make rape ok? NO!!!! Even if rape and aggressive sexual behavior is 'natural', 'natural' does not instantly equal something good or beneficial for a species. Homo sapiens dying of tooth decay at 22 is quite natural, but it's horrific and traumatizing for everyone involved.

All I'm saying is my understanding of men's GLOBAL and CONSTANT violence toward women became easier to understand once I started to think about sexual violence as an issue often found in primate species and not as something completely 100% culturally-bound.

Here's a link to a tumblr write-up that spawned my thoughts on this: http://notcisjustwoman.tumblr.com/post/175761393959/what-is-good-for-the-gander-is-not-always-good-for#notes

(Unabashed_Calabash)
I've read about the extremely complex history of rape among animals of all kinds (they have highly evolved methods of rape--an actual sexual arms race between males and females, as females also evolved to try to avoid rape--in fact, some believe the reason we walk upright is because women first stood up to avoid greater vulnerability to gang rape from behind, and that these gang rapes were so violent many of the females of our prehistoric ancestors who did not stand up did not survive). The species in which pair-bonding and good fatherhood are the norm are not the norm.

There's a reason that male sperm in all species is a complex chemical cocktail. In humans it's designed to lull/drug the mate and bond females to males even at their own expense.

My gut feeling and experiences tell me notjustciswoman is right.

There's a reason rape as committed by men is so normalized and also so easy for men to commit. Behavioral scientists have discussed the not-so-mythical "rape switch" and posited that all or most men have one.

Reading stories of men's mass raiding/raping parties, I'm inclined to agree. (My own experience aligns with this as well. I have actually witnessed a man struggle with his own desire to rape when confronted with a woman highly vulnerable to it. He had a low "rape threshold" certainly, but I don't actually think it's all that unusual. I think human men--because human beings can feel remorse and regret--may struggle with what they have done or the harm they have caused, if society or the victim force them to reflect on this, but they still did it and wanted to do it anyway). Neither the normalization of rape nor its prevalence despite official messages all over the world that it's wrong would be so common if rape were not somehow natural to the males of this species.

I remember an author saying "we cannot deal with violence until we admit uncomfortable truths, such as the thrill of war." The same is true of rape/sexual abuse; there's no way we can combat it without understanding it, and understanding why some men like to do it even when it's officially discouraged, or why men as a class can be easily encouraged to commit it under the right circumstances, is, I think, important if we ever hope to combat it.

(And yes, the history of conquest and invasion in our species is the history of rape. There's a reason so many men in the world carry the same Y chromosome).

PANZER #fundie plus.google.com

[A post about Assigned Male, an admittedly awful comic about trans people. All emphasis from original.]

Episode 1 - Assigned Male / Stephie

[RESHARE THIS POST EVERYWHERE]

Okay, so, you're here reading this very post, so I can only assume you've heard about the internet monstrosity we refer to as "Assigned Male", a web comic about an 11 year old (the age will come up again later) Trans-Girl who was born a male named Stephie, presumably after the author that looks similar to Bridget from the movie Trolls. (photo below.)

Now, back to the issue at hand. Most of the "Assigned Male" comics have been about shaming the "cis" community. First of all, let's backtrack. The author portrays "cis" people as evil bigots in almost every issue of the series. FIRST OFF, "cis" shouldn't be a classification at all. Perhaps, better idea, "cis" should be swapped for another word; "sane", something Stephie clearly is not.

Now, I have placed an instance of "Assigned Male" below. Look familiar to you? It's literally propaganda. Propaganda is made with a few methods: one being demonizing your enemy. Now, find an Assigned Male comic with a "cis" character that isn't made to look like a bad person? Hard, isn't it?

Hitler's propaganda in WW2 featured Jewish people with abnormally long noses and curly hair. Why? To make the enemy look evil and that they shouldn't be trusted. That gained the trust of the German people, and thus, the Holocaust happened with people supporting it.

The shot below features a Grandpa saying that he wants his Grandson/Granddaughter to grow up and be strong like their father.
Uh...
Where exactly is the cissexist hate there, Stephie? A loving Grandfather wants his Grandchild to grow up and be big and strong. That can be carried out for either sex, so that basically just made Stephie look like a fucking retard. But wait, there's more!

This next instance of "Assigned Male" portrays a transgender eleven year old proclaiming that nobody asked him (fuck you, Stephie, I'm calling you by what you were assigned: a male) what he was. Now, first off, lemme allow you to digest the comic below. First off, Stephie, nobody is going to come up and FUCKING ASK YOU what you identify as. That isn't a normal thing to ask in a conversation. Speaking of abnormal things to say in a conversation; the dialogue in Assigned Male is ATROCIOUS, not only in quality but how it portrays pre-teens. Stephie, the author, is acting as if these pre-teens have had a full four years at both Harvard and MIT. NO FUCKING PRE-TEEN SPEAKS LIKE THIS.

Oh, did you think it was over there? Examine this next comic. Did you spot the error? I already have.
Stephie, I have a question:

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK ARE EXTERNAL GENITALIA?

No, seriously. Has our friend Stephie been working with fucking Mutants? Considering he looks like one, probably. Look, I don't mean to Labelle all Trans people here; but these comics are just making you look fucking stupid. Not intelligent.

Now, remember how I said I'd bring up the age again? Here it is: Stephie's characters are all pre-teens. Sure, cool, why is that important?

Bigger question is, why is Stephie in real life concerned with children's genitalia? Let that sink in. We aren't dealing with just some average trans fool, we're dealing with a fucking pedophile. Remember PepeGamerXL? One of those.

Another question, why exactly does Stephie treat Transgender-ism as if there were 7 separate sexes?
You know what else have seven separate sexes?

The Boov, from the children's movie "Home". To be exact, Male, Female, BoyGirl, GirlBoy, BoyBoy, BoyBoyGirl, and BoyBoyBoyBoy. That's bad enough, considering Stephie is treating the group he is promoting as if they were Aliens from a kids movie. Now, hold on a second, the more I think of it, Sophie even looks like a Boov.

Now, remember Fiona from Shrek? Well- actually, no, nevermind, I feel bad for comparing that disgusting freak of nature to Fiona. To be brutally honest, Stephie was probably Assigned Female and fabricated the story that she was born a Male to cover up the fact that she looks like a Shrek character.

Moral of the story: don't be a fucking faggot.
And don't be Sophie Labelle.

[Mission Complete!]
Respect +?

Angrybirdroar #sexist angrybirdroar.wordpress.com

How many is okay?

In light of the revelations still being unearthed about the depravity that occurred within the Challenor house and the recent study that shows the increase in sexual assaults occurring in mixed sex changing rooms, I have realised the narrative has shifted.

Instead of women having to justify why they don’t want men in their safe spaces, the activists have to prove why they should. Women have never been anti-trans but pro-safeguarding. The Challoner case has proved that there will aways be depraved men ready to pounce, given half a chance, and we were clearly stating that.

So if you are still going to lie and say ‘trans women are women’ without acknowledging that trans no longer means transsexual, but includes a myriad of sexual fetishes, then we have the right to assume your motives are nefarious. And from now on we will. Every. Single. Time.

So before you jump on Twitter demanding that women allow male bodies into their safe spaces you must:

Prove that NOT ONE single extra rape or sexual assault will occur. Ever.

Explain to rape victims why they are being transphobic for being terrified of male bodies in their spaces.

Explain to every female why it’s ok that they will never be able to win at sports, because men have decided to cheat.

Explain why men should be on women’s shortlists?

Go on. Prove that there is absolutely no increase in risk. Because all I hear is how dangerous it is for trans in men’s spaces, but zero empathy for the sex that has had to factor in male violence, every second of every day since they were born.

Women have a right to set their own boundaries.

Women have a right to define woman.

Women spend their lives being told how to prevent their own rapes, but are deemed bigots when they try.

Well, we’re telling you now that we don’t believe men can actually become women. Telling us we must is gaslighting and abusive. I don’t subscribe to your bollocks gender religion. Gender (stereotypes) is a cancer and feminism is the chemo.

Watching the gender wars playing out, I have seen too many dangerous creepy perverts, living out their sexual fantasies. Sinister, women hating, fuckers preying on kids and abusing women. We knew men hated us and watching the dude bros defend the Buffalo Bills over women has confirmed this.

You call us TERFS and transphobes? We now know this means you are definitely either a misogynist, a rapist or a paedophile. Probably all three.

Anyone demanding women allow men into their changing rooms, toilets, refuges or prisons is a rapist. If it’s a woman saying it then she wants women to be raped and children to be abused. This is now fact.

You’ve labelled us to further your sick agenda. I’m throwing it back in your twisted little faces.

Any lawyers out there – you might want to offer your services to any victims of the illegal practice of mixed sex facilities and kids who have been experimented on by the trans-munchhausens.

Any politicians out there – we are watching. One more child or woman gets hurt because of your inability to defend females we will come for you so hard you won’t know what’s hit you.

Women are angry. We are defending our sisters and our cubs. Mess with us at your peril, perverts.

Edmund_Kemper #transphobia incels.co

[JFL] Tranny on another forum threatens to murder me and says I should be executed in public

typed by skide

“this fag says "iT's NoNe oF yOuR BuSiNeSs wHaT BaThRoOm tHeY uSe" yes it is.”

No, it is not. You’ve not given me any counter-arguments besides “it makes people uncomfortable” about which I do not give a single tiniest sliver of a fuck. Lemme properly rephrase myself for you: Your buisness, you piece of fucking mental shit, is right there about the space your nose reaches out to, not a fucking inch more. You do not get to fucking police others for making you uncomfortable, respond to that, you little shithead.
You gonna try? then try with me, I’m a transgal and you try policing me, I will genuinely fucking brutalize you to the brink of death and I’ll spit on your broken chassis just for good measure. You seem to labour under some delusion of having the brute force on your side when you simply do not. In my case, I do and I will gladly use it against you, if you as much, as talk to me when I’m inside the stall(and yeah, do go on about how I’m obviously a male because I’m a brutal fuck who like bashing in people’s heads from time to time, specially when they deserve it like you all do, none of you are arbiters of my sex an none of you ever will be but do come here up north and try saying any of your typical offensive shit, I can use some lawsuit cash, so just gimme a cause, just gimme a fucking pretext to).

Now, while I have your attention: You fuckers ARE the degeneracy itself. Controlling other sentients is the most degenerate shit you can attempt and you are all about that. Hell, you hate the very concept of freedom to the point of trying to discredit it in as much effort, as your tiny brains can conjure. One uncomfortable truth, you little pieces of fucking degenerate(as we have established) filth: You are few and we, people who actually value our freedoms and our lives to be lived as we wish, we are a fucking LEGION, sure you can shoot some of us at a mall or in the theater but in the end each loss of yours is going to be irreplacable for you, almost no kid in their right mind is going to go for your little cult while we are never going to cave in to your demands, you are nothing more than a handful of terrorists and you will all die like such(if we could only make your executions public). So spin your little plots, your dreams of world domination, because in reality, you are and always will be left powerless. Utterly pathetic and unable to move a single stone that makes up our society. Grow the fuck up and start listening to actual fuckin adults in the room or rope’s your destiny and I just wish all of you did it at the same time, so we could get rid of your cult for good. Now, don’t give me any of your shit about how you just want to live outside of all this. You don’t. All you want for is control over others and your whole misery stems from not having it anymore. Admit it, you bunch of cowardly fucks. You have made my point the moment you contradicted me about the bathroom stuff not being your buisness. You motherfucking degenerate filth literally consider it your buisness to police others and you always had. For this, you deserve death but I’ll gladly settle for the exclusion and scorn you already get from folks.

Get comfy, fuckheads, it ain’t going nowhere.”

wow. A trans foid threatens to beat me up and kill me because of my political opinion on trans bathroom. The reason why I think trans bathroom is bad is NOT because I think it is uncomfortable it’s because men’s rooms and women’s rooms were separated due to the fact that they have different genitals, not different chromosomes or different genders. If they had the same body and genitals, this wouldn’t be necessary. That’s why this trans bathroom thing is controversial you wannabe tough guy. And threatening to violently beat someone to death and then you Tell me to “grow up” when you talk like a insanely butthurt preteen. What’s next? Make all bathrooms for men and women to share together? So a 11 year old girl should share the bathroom with a 40 year old man? I’m sorry but this just isn’t ok. If you had a vagina this wouldn’t be an issue if you could Change your penis into a vagina. And its crazy how you want us publicly executed just for words and sentences we type online.

also, to the retard who claims to have a 30 year old son, no you don’t. You’re just some 20 year old lying about being Middle Aged so you can be seen as wise and mature by others when in reality no middle aged adult spends their time on forums dedicated to mocking other people. If you’re that age, you’re a manchild

anincelforlifelol #fundie reddit.com

I've seen dontcomplain1 and I want to kill myself

He told me he's an incel. I saw how he looks, and his picture was posted on here. He fucking looks like a male model. Oh my god I can't fucking breathe. THIS is an incel? Of course he said he went out ALONE...reminder A LONER to a fucking state park, and made a shit ton of friends in one day. Are you fucking kidding me? He got their numbers, and all that crap. Try that uglies. I'm a big car guy, and I went out alone to a fucking car meet, and made a total of ZERO FRIENDS in one day. Not one person exchanged numbers with me. Male or female. You want to know why? Because I am ugly. I am a subhuman. He looks better than me. He has better eye area, eye color, skin, hair, lips, cheekbones, jaw, chin. Pretty much everything. Fuck this fucking bullshit fucking life. Fuck this existence. I am fucking genetic garbage. It's so fucking over.

LOOKS MEAN EVERYTHING. I CAN'T FUCKING TAKE THIS. I CAN'T FUCKING BREATHE.

NeetSupremacist #sexist incels.co

When a female says: "I got raped"

During my cuck period when I didn't understood the true nature of females and the blackpill I would always read in shock about females getting raped, I like most people would always think that when a female claims that she got 'raped' by someone that it would mean: "Female got penetrated in her vagina by a male against her consent." This is what rape meant years ago but this meaning changed in time, 20 years ago we would think that the penetration of the female was 'rape' but right now rape has a totally other meaning which isn't bad at all.

What does rape mean today and what do we need to imagine when a female claims that 'she got raped'?

Rape in 2019 is the following:

• Staring at a female as an ugly guy = rape
• Talking to a female as an ugly guy = rape
• Asking a question to a female as an ugly guy = rape
• Touching a female as an ugly guy (anywhere) = rape
• Praising the appearance of a female as an ugly guy = rape
• Asking a female for a date as an ugly guy = rape
• Handshaking a female as an ugly guy = rape
• Asking a female her number as an ugly guy = rape
• Touching the butt of a female as an ugly guy = rape
• Touching a breast of a female as an ugly guy = rape
• Dry fucking a drunk female as an ugly guy = rape
• Dancing with a drunk female as an ugly guy = rape
• Fucking a drunk bitch as an ugly guy = rape
• Having any sexuality with a drunk bitch as an ugly guy = rape
• Asking a female to drive her somewhere as an ugly = rape
• Complementing a female in anyway as an ugly guy = rape
• Breathing in the same room as a woman, being an ugly guy = rape

When Chad does all of the above things mentioned it is not rape anymore, in the matter of fact the females enjoy it and they will not press charges against the Chad.

John Doe #fundie wehuntedthemammoth.com

Adams is so great. Fuck all you dirty piece of shit feminists you should be FUCKING SHOT or sterilized. or sent to a rehabilitation facility.
You should lose your right to vote. Ignorance is dangeorus. and Feminism is evil ignorance. Feminism is not about equal rights and has not been for many decades. Maybe if this was the 1960s america you could say something to me, but now you can shove it up your fucking ass. Fuck american womena nd fuck feminism.
Men will stop getting marreid more and more. THe spawn of the MGTOW groups are evidence of this.
The government is getting what they want. People to stop breeding.
I think every feminist should be sent to a labor camp or imprisoned or shot dead. I don’t care. You are scum and if you are not capable of changing you should lose your right to live. All humans are a burden to the earth, but Feminists are a burden to all humans and everything else, especially men.
Women are treated like children and coddled with kid gloves and in some ways you always have been.
Even in 1890 there was a female bandit in the west that did crazy shit and got away with it for years. But there were men that did the same that were shot dead instantly.
And men have always fought the wars. Women rarely in any society ever had to do so. You got to stay home. You got the easier job.
The only way now for a normal guy to have a healthy relationship with a girl under 30 in the new generation is to scare the shit out of your woman and make her fear you and make her think you will end her life if she tries to screw you over. That is the only way to keep them in line from being destructive bitches. And even then you might have to sit them down and threaten them now and then.
I had to, i’ve had to with the last girl i dated. all the time.
Look what happened when i didn’t. She told her friend i was a drug dealer simply because she was jealous she liked me. She publically slandered me. So i used her took her virginity which honestly id trade for her hotter friend at this point.
Unless you are rich and powerful and good looking youre only real option to have a good time and enough control that you can relax is to scare the shit out of these girls, find some way to blackmail them or scare them and use it. That is the only way.
Even without me saying any of this it remains true and feminism has destroyed the country and everyone born from the 90s onward.
David Futrelle is a piece of shit beta male and should lose his right to vote among other freedoms for supporting such a piece of shit ideology.
The US and Canada and most 1st world countries are female dominated all the way up to the super rich who then are the men having power but everyone who is not rich is ruled and controlled by females if they want any kind of success. Period.
Unless you do as I was saying before, find a way to scare a girl and blackmail her into doing what you want. Because even if she likes you, even if you are perfect for her, she would rather run away and flirt with many other guys and fuck things up. So scare her into submission.

bo1375 #sexist reddit.com

Well, my "peak trans" wasn't any one thing that I can remember. I never really lied to myself about people being able to change sex, but I didn't and still don't see a problem with folks dressing how they want, being called what they want etc. Is it a little insulting as a woman, a female, that men and males use their distorted view of us to define us? Of course. But it's hardly new. I suppose if I could pinpoint one too far moment, it would be the first time I heard someone say if you recognise biological reality, you're a bigot. I just can't understand what is wrong with saying "yeah, I'm male but I want to be a woman so I'm going to live my life as if I was one". How is that insulting to TW? It's their reality.

I'm also very worried by their tendency to lie and fudge figures to support their victimhood.The thing is, TRAs are alienating ppl who would otherwise support them by being grossly misogynistic, bullying and unaccepting of reality. I support them being free to live their lives in the open. I support them having safe spaces of their own. But that's not what they want. They don't want a safe space; they want OUR safe space. Well I'm sorry, that is not on. And if they stopped being so damn selfish they'd see how unreasonable a request (DEMAND) it is. Wanting ppl with penises (obv MALES) in female-only spaces is just too far for me.

Julian Vigo #sexist feministcurrent.com

In an effort to move to a greener existence, I recently switched to an ecological toothbrush. As I have been living uniquely from solar panels for almost two years, I was forced to ditch my electric toothbrush. In choosing an ecological toothbrush, I studied materials, as well as the advantages of recycled plastic brushes versus those with replaceable heads. In the end, I had to eliminate every single option aside from the single one I chose. Yes, I had to exclude that which did not meet my personal standards and convenience.

I think a lot about exclusion these days. The #MeToo campaign which emerged in reaction to the sexually aggressive acts of Harvey Weinstein is clearly a female-centered campaign. But recently I’ve seen arguments that #MeToo should be extended to include males. While being “inclusive” of everyone might seem like a nice idea, the reality is that there are perfectly rational reasons for exclusivity in many situations. Our shared experiences with certain humans help us form bonds where and when we need them. These bonds can often make life bearable for those experiencing particularly painful moments in their lives. Commonalities help to create community. The truth is that all communities are exclusive, in one way or another, of individuals who don’t share certain experiences or requisites. While some might be tempted to argue exclusion equates to segregation, such arguments are very much apples and oranges, particularly in the context of women’s rights.

There are several key differences which should be underscored, when discussing “exclusion” in the women’s liberation movement, beginning with the myth that feminism must focus on males. Thanks to liberal feminists like Emma Watson, among others, many women have been made to believe that arguing for the inclusion of males in the women’s movement is a worthwhile cause. But any group in protest of its oppression by another group is within its rights to demand that the oppressor not be included in its organizing. For instance, when labour unions secured the legal right to represent employees in 1935, employers were excluded from the class of employees because it was understood that employers (as well as managers and supervisors) held power over workers. In terms of economic class, it seems that most people are on the same page when understanding which group holds power over another.

Similarly, civil rights advocacy began with the premise that there is social inequality between people of colour and white people, making a necessary distinction between who is being oppressed under white supremacy. Robbing a person of the right to distinguish the oppressor class means that she is barred from speaking about and identifying her oppression.

Nobody expected the Black Panthers to consider the marginalization of KKK members from their organization for good reason. Similarly, no such claim of exclusion was made about the Million Man March in Washington D.C. in 1995, when approximately 400,000 African American men converged en masse in the nation’s capital to engage in teach-ins, worship services, and community organizing. While there was a discussion over the fact that women were excluded, there was also recognition that black men had the right to gather without women to discuss their issues, and this action was largely supported by African American women. Two years later, the Million Woman March was held in D.C. to focus on issues specific to women.

This sort of exclusion is not based in hatred or a desire to do harm. Exclusion is how we decide, like me and my ecological toothbrush choices, what meets our needs. Exclusion is not necessarily about owning a card to an elite club — it is about setting a particular direction for an individual, group, activity, community, and so forth. All social groups exclude in some way. While I am a big believer in reaching over the aisle to dialogue with those responsible for our subordination, I also recognize the need of any group to make decisions within its group before reaching across that aisle.

(..)

Does the fact of breast cancer support groups for women mean that males cannot get breast cancer? Of course not. And there are breast cancer support groups for males. Why? Because males and females experience breast cancer differently. Commonalities between same-sexed bodies are part of the social intimacy that both males and females alike cherish across cultures. Be it in the hammam or the steam room, the hospital ward, or the changing room at the gym, there is intimacy between people of the same sex that provides a space of security and dignity. Females especially value these spaces because the public sphere is not safe for women. Being in a female-only changing room can offer women a needed reprieve from the daily sexualization of their bodies, and from unwanted male attention and judgment.

The issue of “exclusion” has become a touchpoint for the left in recent years. Most notably, we have seen exclusion being derided as bigotry in trans activist circles where women who say they would not feel comfortable with a male in their change rooms, their women’s shelters, or in a women’s prison are labelled transphobic. Yet both these examples come from real life paradigms. In 2007, Vancouver Rape Relief Society won a case against Kimberly Nixon, a trans-identified male who had attempted to join the training group for peer counsellors at the women’s shelter.

Nixon was asked to leave the group account of having been born male, and because the shelter operated on the basis that women could best counsel other women, having had the specific experience of growing up female under patriarchy. The B.C. Court of Appeals’ decided that Vancouver Rape Relief had the right to determine its own membership, as any oppressed group of people has the right to “discriminate” when organizing in their own interests, as a class. Currently pending in Texas is the case of three female inmates who are suing Federal Medical Center Carswell in Fort Worth, claiming that, “They are living in a degrading and dangerous environment by being forced to share showers and bathrooms with the transgender inmates.” The truth is that, for most women, sex does matter. What is more remarkable is that males who claim to have an internal “female identity” have zero compassion for or comprehension of the reality women face in a male supremacist world, and would prefer women put aside their own material reality, comfort, and safety in order to validate men’s feelings.

Choosing a female gynecologist or desiring a female-only space for changing is not meant to incriminate all males as, to paraphrase George W. Bush, “evil doers.” Rather, a woman might choose a female gynecologist both because she feels a woman would better understand her body, but also because she feels safer in that vulnerable state with someone statistically unlikely to assault them. Women’s desire to change in a locker room without male-bodied persons would likely be based on something similar, as well as a desire to maintain healthy boundaries that too often go unrespected. In excluding males from female spaces, women are demanding that society accept the healthy boundaries of women, even if, in certain scenarios, males might wish to be on the other side of the line.

Last week, Bustle ran a story arguing that “some members of LGBTQ community feel that the [#MeToo] campaign focuses too strongly on the gender binary and seems to erase nonbinary or genderqueer people from the conversation.” But what this statement really conveys is that males feel excluded from a conversation lead by women speaking out about male violence. While I would not deny that males experience violence, it is overwhelmingly violence inflicted by other males. What makes #MeToo important is that violence against women and girls is coded into the structural social hierarchy. When women contribute their #MeToo stories, they are doing so as females who have, from childhood, been groomed as objects that exist for male use.

It cannot be overstated that females suffer disproportionate levels of sex-based discrimination and violence, including sexual harassment, domestic violence, rape, and trafficking. Women are quite aware that they are discriminated against and physically abused because of their sex, regardless of how they may feel, internally, about the gender roles imposed on them. It is entirely insignificant, for example, how the over 200 women who James Toback sexually harassed identified. To demand that #MeToo include non-binary people is to miss the point of the feminist movement: feminism has from its inception been explicitly about breaking the hierarchy and stereotypes reinforced through gender which demanded women not leave the house, not vote, and not work. It is not the “binary” that is the problem so much as it is gender itself, under patriarchy. Men who rape women don’t care whether their victims feel “binary” or not.

What Bustle would like is for women to use a language that is seemingly more neutral, less politically objectionable, and more inclusive… of males. Otherwise there would be no uproar with focusing specifically on women’s voices and experiences in this campaign. Males insisting on being “included” in women’s social protest against sexism is just more of the same sexism — women are being instructed to shut up about their oppression by males unless they include males. Beyond that, under patriarchy, women are always under pressure to be sexually available to men. This new language of “inclusion” that frames “exclusion” as inherently harmful has led to males who identify as transgender to insist that women include them not only in their groups and politics, but in their beds. That this is explicitly sexist is made clear through the fact that I have yet to see any male who identifies as trans pressure heterosexual men into sleeping with him.

A narrative that insists on coercing or goading women into including their oppressor is anything but progressive. Likewise, insisting that the language of gender neutrality is what matters in a conversation about sexual violence is far from revolutionary. Taking up the five-cent terms like “non-binary” and “queer” will have no impact on the facts of sex-based oppression for females. The challenge we face as a society is not to carpet bomb women’s movements with accusations of “exclusivity” and “bigotry” when women recognize that males and females are different and have different needs. Creating linguistic games might seem avant-garde to undergraduates, but the reality is that gender is what prescribes the behavioral cues engrained in females throughout their lives. Gender is what is hammered into females as a class, rendering them subjects of a discourse they have no power to respond to. The notion that gender can ever be neutral is patently absurd since gender is not the solution. It is the problem.

Changing language to be “be more inclusive” is counter-revolutionary and pretending that such language does anything other prevent women from effectively organizing towards their own liberation is delusory. The language of gender inclusivity does nothing to dismantle the social and political inequalities that females face. It does, however, create a lovely illusion (especially for men who want to seem progressive in their attempts to thwart our movement): that saying “genderqueer” makes one a “feminist.”

hyderabadipotta432 #sexist reddit.com

Reminder that if you have to try, then it's already over. Rant.

Do you think chad has to try? Do you think women are actually "shy innocent pure maidens of goodness" when around Chad? Put Chad next to that one "innocent quite girl" in class you thought you had a chance with, and watch her "miraculously" blossom into a social butterfly while she talks to Chad as she twirls her hair and giggles and shit. Women will go out of THEIR way to make you aware If they find you attractive and are interested. If the guy is attractive enough, they will even actually sexually assault him by smacking his ass when they walk by. These are the most BRAZEN and UP FRONT actions that a women can and WILL do to a Male she finds physically sexually attractive. If you have lived on this earth for the past 20+ years, and haven't gotten even the SLIGHTEST hint that a women finds you physically attractive, you are most probably not attractive to the current modern day woman.

Which is why I FUCKING HATE those gay ass fucking posts that say "have you even tried talking to wahmen". Why should i, when Chad Thundercock literally gets his dick sucked as soon as he walks through the door? Tell me why I should? So I can take that 1 PERCENT chance that a women will agree to go out on a "date" with me. Just so that when we get there im doing the one doing all the talking while her face is glued to her phone and all she says is "uh huh" "yeah" "sure". Then when the "date" comes to its end she'll make me pay the bill and say something like "look, I totally like you... friend and I rather not jeopardize our totally awesome friendship by taking this any further, OMG you are like a brother to me! Teehee." Where then she proceeds to go to get on tinder to get fucked by some random Chad 5 min away.

Is this what you "just talk to wahmen" faggots consider ascending? Being used as a walking, breathing, meal ticket? Lmfao I rather be "volcel" my entire life then, atleast I'd have my dignity intact.

Women aren't "shy", they are just selective, and choose the men they associate with. There are the attractive males they want to fuck, and their beta orbiters who they recieve constant validation and attention from. By associating with these two groups women stand to gain something. Then there is us, we are the third group. We are neither attractive enough for women to want to fuck us, but neither are we bluepilled beta cucks that give them constant validation and praise them for existing. This is why women don't associate with men like us, since they don't gain anything by doing so.

closetedxxcishet #sexist reddit.com

Common Trans Paradoxes:

Trans women: PUNCH TERFS! KILL TERFS! STAB TERFS!
Also Trans women: We totally won't attack you in female spaces or anything.

Trans women: WE ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN CIS WOMEN!
Also Trans women: WE ARE THE MOOOOOOST HARASSED AND RAPED AND MARGINALIZED PEOPLE EVER! CIS PRIVILEGE IS REAL!

Trans women: We aren't erasing women!
Also Trans women: Vulva cupcakes kill!

Trans women: We aren't harassing or erasing lesbians!
Also trans women: FUCK ME OR YOU'RE A BIGOT AND I'LL RUIN YOUR LIFE!

Trans women: We aren't just men in dresses or women in suits!
Also trans women: THIS HISTORICAL CROSS DRESSER WAS TRANS!

Trans women: Vaginas aren't female! Penises aren't male! It's not all about genitals!
Also trans women: Pleasepleasepleaseplease contribute to our GoFundMe so we can change our genitals or else we'll kill ourselves.

Trans women: It's not all about passing!
Also trans women: Pleasepleasepleaseplease contribute to our GoFundMe so we can pass or else we'll kill ourselves.

Trans women: It's not about genitals!
Also trans woman: That drag queen can't perform here because he doesn't have the right genitals!

I'm sure you folks can come up with plenty of other examples....I'm just so tired of this crap.

InstantCoffee_ #sexist reddit.com

Males should never work as gynecologists or anything with female exclusive health issues

Excuse my language but I'm so fucking furious I just want to scream out loud. I saw a post on Facebook where a woman described what she had to go through at the gynecologist. This is what she wrote

I was at an gynecological examination for an abortion, the nurse had a male apprentice with her. I was too afraid to say anything even though I felt uncomfortable. During the exam he put two fingers inside of me like the nurse already did meanwhile he asks "is it okay if I also examine you by the way". When I said no he laughed at me and said "well, now it's too late". I felt so humiliated and little.

Now tell me, why the fuck do we even allow men to work as or study to gynecologists? Considering how men are socialised, it's a very strange career choice for a man and I can't help to think that there is ALWAYS a ulterior move behind. I heard so many horror stories from women who had appointments with male gynecologists where they flirted or made comments about their vagina, in other words, sexual harassment. How the fuck are we supposed to feel safe with male gynecologists?! My first appointment with a gynecologist was also really horrible, he was extremely rude and he asked me if I ever had sex, when I said yes he said that then I shouldn't be afraid of the exam since I already been penetrated. When I told him that I only had sex with women he said that it doesn't count and that I am a virgin. It is first now I realise that this was just extremely creepy and whether I had PIV sex or not had NOTHING to do with my current problems at the time!!!

Also, why the fuck should men who don't have any idea what it's like to be a woman, who have never felt period cramps so painful that you just lay in a fetal position on your bed crying, work with treating women who have endometrios? Women with endometrios are almost never even taken serious by male doctors, I heard so many horror stories from women here as well who just heard that they should go home, put a warm wheat pillow on their stomach and take an aspirin (which also leads me to the question if these men are really this stupid or just do this because they enjoy the fact that women feel pain).

Men should not be allowed to work in healthcare with female exclusive issues! I hope I'm not alone thinking this.

bransrath #fundie bransrath.tumblr.com

[ There are no documented cases of trans women attacking or abusing cis women in restrooms or locker rooms.
There aren’t even an documented cases of cis men pretending to be trans women to peep at or abuse women in women-only spaces
There thousands upon thousands of more cases of trans women being physically, verbally, or sexually abused by cis men AND women in bathrooms and locker rooms. There are even cases of butch cis women being targeted as side effect of this.
Anyone who uses their “concern” that men will abuse trans-inclusive bathrooms to ban trans women from using the correct bathroom is a fear-monger. They are hiding their transphobia behind “concern” and use it troll off of people’s completely unfounded fears of trans women.

I promise you, we are more afraid of you than you are of us. ]


How dare you.

I have three daughters. Fuck you for calling me your bullshit, ablesit, made up names for having concern for my daughters you asshat.

The reason there are no cases of CIS men posing as a trans to get into a woman’s restroom is because THEY NEVER COULD BEFORE!!!

I am SO damn sick of this LGBT bullshit where you all threaten to brand us with your ableist slurs if we don’t go along with all your little demands. Fuck you. My daughters come first. I oppose men walking into women’s bathrooms for THEM, and I always will.

I am not afraid of your name calling.

bear-flag-revolt #fundie bear-flag-revolt.tumblr.com

[Blog description]

WARNING DO NOT FOLLOW!!!
We're evil greedy corrupt vile vicious nasty racist rich priveledge oppressive patriarch Anglo-Saxon Alpha-male ( though technically I'm a poor Fucking Mexican ) Who hates communism uninsured poor people ( and sea otters ) especially minority children who we advocate for the death of 7 billion of them by donating to the NRA, denying them affordable healthcare and giving tax cuts to the rich so Fuck off to your safe space! And take all the other soap eating, condom snorting, pussy hat wearing, knee taking, America hating, Islam loving, ISIS arming, Iran funding, baby murdering, gender bending, war losing, marxist mother fucking, godless, tax loving , anti-freedom fairy fucking faggot ass liberals with you!

vintologi_se #transphobia #sexist #crackpot #quack docdroid.net

(This is from “Transmaxxing Manifesto”, the whole thing is 36 pages of PDF so there’s a lot of insanity there, this is just a small part.)

The male gender role is broken

Let's face it, if you present as male, there's exactly one personality that will earn you social approval: Chad. Assertive, dominant, successful. Nobody will be impressed by a male that is meek, submissive and struggling. Such males are not considered gender trailblazers; they're just derided as incel NEETs.Nobody is offering an actual solution to this. Tradcons tell you to just man up. TERFs tell you to just abolish gender. Liberals deny this reality altogether.

By embracing girlmode, you actually become free to be your authentic self without shame. Society at large requires men to keep grinding and struggling to keep the lights on, so obviously no serious and respectable person will encourage you to just drop down the pink vortex, but it's possibly the only thingthat will actually help you if you're stuck being a shitty male with no prospects.

Life outcomes of people that transition

Trans-women will benefit from the increasing female privilege, thus in the future more males will benefit from transitioning while it becomes less beneficial for females to transition to male despite trans-men becoming more accepted by society. Trans-women that are supported by their parents have good life outcomes as society becomes more accepting of trans-women the outcomes of people that transition from male to female will improve.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284551812_Impacts_of_Strong_Parental_Support_for_Trans_Youth

But what if people around you are not supportive of you transitioning?

Avoiding social difficulties while transitioning

The focus of transitioning should be on changing your secondary sexual characteristics (hormones, surgery, etc.). You should regard it as a body modification similar to “bodybuilding”. This is the only sensible approach if you value your social life, integrity, and self-respect.

If you believe that there is an “innate gender” which is unrelated to biology or society then you will inevitably create social problems for yourself. People might understand that one might want to be (or look like) a woman, but almost everyone takes “born in the wrong body” as a joke, especially if you were not previously flamboyant.

If you do not look and are socially regarded as a woman, claiming that you are a woman in the inside and that people should respect your innate gender regardless of how you look is meaningless and futile.

This at best makes people pity you and at worst makes them mock and bully you. The situation worsens if you dress in women's clothing but still look like a man. This should be avoided first and foremost out of self-respect, and second out of respect for fellow trannies. You will also hurt yourself for thinking that people do not treat you the way you should be treated.

You do not have to come out in any way to your family or other people who know your real identity.

Whether or not you should transition isn't something you should discuss with people who have not properly researched these topics, most people including your family will be utterly ignorant and thus they will not be able to give you any real help. If you announce that you plan or think about transitioning people around you may push or outright coerce you into not doing so even though it would be beneficial for you.

Thus the solution is to start medication without telling anyone about it that knows your real identity, later if/when they start noticing changes you can tell them that you are transitioning.

If you currently live in a transphobic environment you may want to relocate before socially transitioning. You may want to just leave everything behind to start a new better life if/when you can pass fully as a girl, being stealth allows you to escape transphobia and be treated just like another girl.

How society benefits from people transitioning

People that wish to transition usually have comorbid mental disorders 105106 thus future generations are likely to benefit from letting these women transition and sterilize themselves in the process, this comes with the cost of using tax-money for these medical expenses and losing women that could provide sexual satisfaction to other people.

Males transitioning to female is beneficial for society since it would allow people to have fun fucking them. Incels transitioning to female is good for society since they will become less likely to develop or maintain problematic political beliefs or become violent, they will instead benefit from accelerated hypergamy and gynocentrism.

Less incels trying to force females to waste themselves on losers is a good thing.

It has been proven safe to allow trans-women inside spaces reserved for women 01 trying to exclude them would harm natal women too 234

Not using tax-money to pay for medical transition would be dysgenic since it would make it more difficult for poor people to transition.

E S #transphobia #pratt youtube.com

Around 32:00 - the reason trans lesbians are "cringy" is that they are HETEROSEXUAL MALES with a fetish. They may "identify" as women, but they are MALES. Part of the trans ideology is that those males should be able to obtain legal status as "females" and thus be granted access to spaces heretofore restricted from males because they are spaces where FEMALES are vulnerable. This should creep you and everybody else out; it is cringy. The legal fiction of "males becoming females" and the reverse needs to stop.

Menace Clan #racist lyricsmania.com

[Lyrics to "Kill Whitey"]

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)

God (God!)
Niggas in the church say (LAA)

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)
God (God!)
Uncle tom house nigga (RAH!)

The white man is a devil, a beast, beserk, snake, Satan, serpent, evil, wicked, dragon, demonic, Hell-Born, Iblis, brutal, wild, fierce, untamed, the archenemy, father of lies, prince of darkness, nigga let me (?)
The Crips and Bloods are soldiers I'm recruitin'
Wit no dispute,
Drive by shootin' on this white genetic mutant,
Wanna know where I'm from?
I'm from "Fuck Yo Hood",
Dont even hit me up, fuck yo set
Let's go, and kill some rednecks (muthafucka)
The Menace Clan aint afraid, to check a hood
The Menace Clan aint afraid of a peckerwood
Fuck George Bush, fuck Bill Clinton, fuck Ross Perot, fuck Dan Quayle, what the hell?
Fuck Daryl Gates, fuck Stacey Koon, fuck Ted Briseno, fuck Lawrence Powell, fuck Timothy Wind, and judge George Carter,
Im down wit my nigga Shady,
I got the .380,
My homies think Im crazy cuz I shot a white baby, I said, I said, I said

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)

God (God!)
Niggas in the church say (LAA)

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)
God (God!)
Uncle tom house nigga (RAH!)

When I unload the muthafuckin Glock,
Ya body clot,
Ya homies are shot,
Im up the block before ya body drop,
A nigga dumpin' on yo white ass,
Fuck this rap shit, nigga I'ma blast,
I dont give a fuck, if,
None of yall niggas aint down,
I'll beat a white boy to the muthafucking ground,
Im wit tha M-E-N-A-C-E,
I could see you but ya cant see me,
Now what have we?
Im (?) you,
Just bust the one-less busta, musta,
Bit the dust,
Fuck this rap shit, nigga Im bust, on yo ass,
Ima slash and slash,
And they hear the sax,
You neva heard no shit like this,
Menace,
I piss on ya grave,
Civilize a slave,
Blow up ya church, then I blow up ya turf,
You will search,
For the Menace, Clan,
But in his, hand,
Theres a muthafuckin nine,
So they dont cross the line cuz I...

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)

God (God!)
Niggas in the church say (LAA)

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)
God (God!)
Uncle tom house nigga (RAH!)

dailyantifeminist #sexist dailyantifeminist.wordpress.com

Make Testosterone Great Again (By Legalizing Rape)

A society in which a man is not afraid to put a women in her place (by raping her) is a society where you can fuck a 12-year-old teenager just to know what it feels like. In other words: White Knightism and Blue Knightism are inseparable. And both are directly correlated with the ongoing sissification of society.

We are living in a low-testosterone, high-estrogen world. My point in this is not to promote some silly “machismo” or something. Rather, it’s a simple and even obvious proposition: the modern modes of communication and more importantly the very thought-patterns have become womanish. People today are passive-agressive, petty, uninspiring, catty, and snarky. It used to be that women were bitches; now men are also bitches.

MRAs talk a lot about “the war on boys,” and while they are correct, the issue is much bigger than that. There is an all-pervasive thought-police, run for the benefit of Feminists and serving their interests, that has completely obliterated any healthy expression of male sexuality; now men are in the passive position, because women hold all the power – “power” meaning the ability to have one’s will done.

Right now, as I’m sitting on the bus, I can remember all the recent instances when women have “bagspread” against me. It’s always women who do the bagspreading, isn’t it? Yet everyone talks about “manspreading” (they don’t even call it legspreading – it’s specifically men who are accused of it) as if that’s the only issue going on.

In reality, #MeToo has been going on for several decades straight. And all along the way, it is “beta males” who suffered the most for it; the alphas play by their own rules, while betas do what society (read: women) tells them to do. And you don’t have to tell me that what I’m saying is nothing new. I realize it perfectly well. The question is: what does the alternative look like?

To me, it looks like an environment that accepts the full scope of male sexuality is one where I can actually use my hand to touch the knee of the woman currently sitting on the bus seat to my left and get away with it. In such a society there is no issue of men being commandeered by women, nor is it illegal to disregard the word “no,” which is more often than not merely a token gesture, anyway.

Legalization of rape is the single most effective way of eliminating the phenomenon of Knightism in all its manifestations. When I know that a woman’s only means of resisting my advances when we’re alone in a secluded area is her physical force, which is inferior and outright meager compared to mine (statistically speaking), I know that indeed, I am a man, and she is a woman. And she would know it just as well.

Legalization of rape can bring the backbone of masculinity – back. Sperm counts will rise sharply. Women will get pregnant again (one way or another). The TFR will make your run-of-the-mill alt-righter contented. The sissification of male behavior will stop. Legalization of rape, as outlined in that post that I wrote, is as pro-social as it can ever get. Political Correctness doesn’t stand a chance when I can legally assert my masculinity by forcing the neighbor’s putative teenage daughter to suck me off.

Far from constituting a “problem,” rape is an integral ingredient of the solution. 90% of social ills would be gone with this one simple trick. Everything falls into place when there is no law in the book of laws that says “a man can’t compel a woman to fuck him.” There shouldn’t be any such laws, whatsoever.

Rape is good. And raping 12-year-olds is perfect.

williebill #racist groups.google.com

You chinks stop posting here
This is usa board, not hong kong board. You want ti post ti, U post
ti in hong kong on slant board, savy????
U take E up 2 much space and U crowd my spam out.
oooooooooooooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh
U begin to piss me off E big time.
This not very rary funny...
We sick of U sellin watches here and makie all this money. People Hu
post here are what we call broke bums, wit out a pot or a fuckin
window to toss it outta of....
Dey don't fuckin care what time it is.
Dey all work behind a counter in a pawn shop, behind counter of pool
hall, or in car wash making $6 and hour. They can't afford a $20
rubber watch.
So if you chinks dont take a fuckin hike, I hear dee people on da
board is a gonna buy Hu a $800 plane ticket, fly him RT to hong kong
and he gonna kick yo shit into next fuckin tuesday.
ooooooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
He badder than Genghis Kahn. He badder than Startrek Kahn.
No mo foolin around wit youse chinks. Dis Hu, is one bad mother
fucker. He was trained in the Edison New joyzee sholin temple
tambernacle of Jehovas witnesses by grand master won hung low and has
a 6th degree white belt in sneaking up and hitting youse from
behind.
He be badder than Bruce Lee, ah so, he badder than Jackie Chan, fuck,
he kick chan ass fo lunch. He say, chan big pussy, just circus
acrobat.
So if youse dont want yo pig tails shoved up yo asses, stop posting
and selling does watches.

speedtypingincel #wingnut #sexist #psycho #dunning-kruger incels.co

Americans and UK need to stop using government definition to define "rape", "pedophilia" or whatever other bullshit "crimes"

Take for example this article. In this article this man who went to see a prostitute was jailed because "She said: ‘Hogben went beyond what was consented to by removing the protection, which the complainant will say was a condition of intercourse." Take notice that she said "consented". The rape law in UK is based on consent so that would fit the definition of "rape". However, here's the problem with using government to define acts:

If you use government's definition of rape then you're admitting you're an NPC who can't think for himself because whatever the government says... THAT IS RIGHT. If the government decides to change the definition of rape to "rape is coercion therefore violence or threats with a weapon" then the man above would not be a rapist. If the government decides to change the definition of free speech to "anything is free speech EXCEPT doubting Holocaust"... then doubting Holocaust is not free speech. If having sex with women below the age of consent (16 in UK) is pedophilia... then if the age of consent gets changed to age 5, having sex with 5-year-old girls/boys is not pedophilia!

The logical fallacies and NPC faggotry that normies wallow in is too much.

Rape is unwanted sex with an short/ugly male. Because sex with a tall, handsome male is always desired the foid will never be raped. If a prostitute is fucking an unattractive man, she's still being raped because it's unwanted, she just takes money for it. It's a transaction. Once the man exceeds the limits society has put on him (removing the condom and crossing the line as a short, unattractive man) it gets called R-A-P-E! You bet your ass that she wouldn't cry rape if the man was a tall chad.

TheNewKnightsTemplar #fundie deviantart.com

Hello and greetings from 2019. I am happy you have come upon this time capsule and have very deep hopes that humanity has survived and this is not being read by a caterpillar, if it IS, I guess it will eventually evolve into a human being someday, anyway. I know, right?

Our current President Donald Trump has made terrific strides in making American great again, but the only way the Left will acknowledge this is by trying to give Obama the credit. Trump DOES make a few blunders, but when we point out that President Obama made them as well, the Left blames President Trump for President Obama’s mistakes. In fact, the Left blames President Trump for everything. And if you think the Left hates the President, you should see how bizarre they get when they see a red hat.

The Democratic Left, which is pretty much all of the Democratic Party, in order to push their agenda, has been allowed to make up words, phrases, and concepts in this day and age. For instance, they say “toxic masculinity” needs to stop, we can’t have “boys being boys”, you know, like shooting guns or anything, but that is merely because the feminists don’t want girls being girls, they want girls being boys so they can shoot guns, even though they could very easily shoot guns being girls. It is somewhat like The Boy Scouts of America but with girls included, although I don’t think the Girl Scouts of America let Boy Scouts enter. But, I’m optimistic, both sexes are starting to take high school showers together in Florida.

In fact, according to the Left, girls CAN be boys all they have to do is to FEEL like a boy, and if a boy feels like a girl, he can be a girl and it is okay because that isn’t toxic masculinity it is “non-toxic masculinity” which is actually feminine masculinity. I know, right? How can all of this possibly be? Simple--Because gender is a social construct but you are born that way. And if someone feels like the opposite sex, you have to call them by “zip” or “zot” or something like that; or it is considered violence and even though you didn’t know they felt like the opposite sex or forgot to ask, they can kill you. And homosexuality is okay because the sex they have isn’t hurting anyone, but you are deranged as hell (maybe not by next week), if you have sex with the dead, even though THAT really isn’t hurting anyone either.

And socialism is the latest and greatest thing, even though it has been around as long as dirt. But it will work this time, even though it has never ever worked in the past; because it is DEMOCRATIC Socialism. And the difference is ... actually there IS no difference but who cares because things will be free! Free health care and college and vehicles and cell phones and we might as well throw in meals until things collapse and there is no more food. We will still have to work, though. I know, right?

And abortion is perfectly okay because a woman has a right to do what she wants with her body, although it ISN’T her body because it has its own DNA. And it isn’t alive although it has a heartbeat. And it isn’t her body after the baby is born, either, but that doesn’t matter as long as we keep the mother’s mental health intact. And the best WAY to keep the mother’s mental health intact is to kill her infant.

And infanticide is something Islamic extremists have been known to do, but we can’t say that out loud or we are an Islamophobe. Which actually doesn’t mean in inordinate fear of Islam anymore, it has been changed to mean “hater” of all and everything Islam and sometimes more than that. And note; we are still CALLING the baby an infant because the Left hasn’t, as of yet, had the chance to come up with a stigma-lessening euphemism like “external cellular expiration” or for the more socially elite, “Baby B Gone”. We can even revive the child and have a nice, extremely short and pressure-prone discussion with the already overwhelmed mother, so that if she does have regrets after the slaughter, which she will, she has been involved in the decision because it is all about “choice”. However, choice still means two or more options, but if you express opinions favoring THE OTHER option besides killing, you’re a racist. I am not really sure why you are a racist; almost everyone who does anything anymore is a racist, so I guess it just got included in the name of “diversity” and “love”. Maybe not love.

If this is all confusing for you, I have to admit is rather the same for most of us on the RIGHT, what comforts me is that we live in a tolerant society, that is unless you are Christian or Jewish, and then you don’t count, especially if you refuse to make certain kinds of wedding cakes.

Besides much controversy these days about war, we have a rather perplexing breed of individuals we call SJW’s or “Social Justice Warriors”. They don’t really DO anything or WEAR any ARMOR, they just lay in wait for people to say something offensive, which is pretty much everything they hear. These warriors believe in “all things civil” especially good productive discussion, as long as they get to scream and you don’t get to say anything at all. That is, unless you agree with them, and then you can all hold hands and go to a designated area called a “safe space”. Oddly enough, although you might think these spaces were designed for preschoolers, they are actually most prominent on our college campuses these days. They are even in the internet encyclopedia called Wikipedia, which is a rather “strange bird” in itself because anyone can add anything to it in the name of collaboration, so it changes a lot. Sometimes these SJW’s turn into a fantasy creature called a troll, but it amounts to the same thing, screaming and then running off to a safe space.

Our Mainstream Media are much the same as the SJW’s but we still have freedom of speech, unless you post anything conservative on certain social platforms like Facebook and YouTube and Twitter and a few others. But they apologize for taking things down, usually; some of the time; if they get caught; and they have been working on new algorithms and training their staff to not be so sensitive for the last decade or so, so things are looking promising. Our search engines like Google aren’t very reliable either, but who needs an honest search engine?

I hope this has cleared up what 2019 is like at the time of burying this time capsule. I am sure you wish you had science and history records, but they were all destroyed by the Left and replaced with pornography.

An SJW just told me to tell you to write when you can. I know, right?

Tobias Langdon #transphobia #wingnut #racist #pratt #dunning-kruger unz.com

image

Sex and race are, to the left, mere social constructs, abstract systems of delusion and injustice that can be overturned by human will and social engineering. It follows, then, that leftists will support and celebrate men who reject the social construct of sex and claim to be women. And leftists do support and celebrate such men.

Triumph of the Trannies

It also follows that leftists will support and celebrate Whites who reject the social construct of race and claim to be Blacks. But leftists don’t support and celebrate such Whites. Quite the contrary. While Bruce Jenner, a man claiming to be a woman, is worshipped and rewarded, Rachel Dolezal, a White claiming to be a Black, is ridiculed and punished. Steve Sailer and others have drawn attention to this contradiction, but I don’t think they’ve properly explained it.

Why do leftists cheer when men cross the border between the sexes, but jeer when Whites try to cross the border between the races?

I pose those questions deliberately in that form to draw out the links between the left’s love of transgenderism and the left’s love of open borders. The Jewish libertarian Murray Rothbard (1926–95) described this aspect of leftist ideology very well in this passage of an otherwise long-winded and boring essay:

The egalitarian revolt against biological reality, as significant as it is, is only a subset of a deeper revolt: against the ontological structure of reality itself, against the “very organization of nature”; against the universe as such. At the heart of the egalitarian left is the pathological belief that there is no structure of reality; that all the world is a tabula rasa that can be changed at any moment in any desired direction by the mere exercise of human will — in short, that reality can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings. (Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, Modern Age, Fall 1973)

Rothbard was right in general about leftism, but failed to explain that highly significant exception: why does the “exercise of human will” allow Bruce Jenner and others to become women, but not allow Rachel Dolezal and others to become Blacks?

Sex and race are both aspects of reality, but the left believes that only one of those aspects “can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings.” Why so? I would explain it by supplementing Rothbard’s explanation. Yes, he’s right when he says the left have a magical belief in the reality-transforming power of “human will,” but he doesn’t discuss what happens when there is a clash of wills.

The high and the low

Let’s look at transgenderism first. Men like Bruce Jenner and Jonathan Yaniv (pictured) have “willed” that men can become women and must enjoy unrestricted access to all female spaces. At the same time, some women — the so-called Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists or TERFs — have “willed” that men can’t become women and must keep out of female spaces. There is a clash of wills that is settled, for the Left, by the status of the opposing sides. In leftist eyes, the men have higher status than the women, which is why the men’s will prevails and the women’s will is rejected. But hold on, you might be thinking: How can the men have higher status than the women in leftist eyes? It’s easy: the transgender men have cleverly aligned themselves not with men in general, who are indeed of lower status than women, but with homosexual men, who are of higher status than women.

Trangendered men are part of the “LBGTQ+ community,” which lifts them above women in the leftist hierarchy. Take Jonathan Yaniv, the perverted and probably Jewish male, who claims to be a woman and has been suing female cosmeticians in Canada for refusing to wax his fully intact male genitals. If Yaniv spoke the truth, he would admit that he is a heterosexual male who seeks perverted sexual pleasure by passing himself off as a woman and receiving Brazilian waxes or entering female toilets to share tampon tips with under-age girls, etc. Obviously, then, Yaniv can’t admit the truth. Heterosexual men are wicked in leftist eyes and are well below women in the leftist hierarchy. Heterosexual men definitely cannot pass themselves off as women in pursuit of perverted sexual thrills.

Actual authentic lesbians

Yaniv and other “trans-women” must therefore align themselves with homosexuals to pass leftist purity-tests. As trans-women they claim to be members of a sexual minority, which triggers the leftist love of minority-worship. Indeed, Yaniv and some others go further than simply claiming to be women: they claim to be actual authentic lesbians. A pinned tweet at Yaniv’s Twitter account states that he is “One proud lesbian. I’ll never give up fighting for human rights equality. #LGBTQoftwitter.” Yaniv isn’t a lesbian, of course. Real lesbians — that is, real women who are sexually attracted to other real women — quite rightly reject fake lesbians like him, so the fake lesbians exploit leftist ideology again and accuse real lesbians of bigotry and hate.

Feminism has the concept of the “glass ceiling,” whereby women are unjustly prevented by sexist men from reaching the highest positions in politics, business and academia. Inspired by this, the fake lesbians have invented the concept of the “cotton ceiling,” whereby men like Yaniv are unjustly prevented by real lesbians from removing the underwear of said lesbians and having sex with them. Here is a trans-lesbian activist lecturing a sceptical TERF (i.e. Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist for those not up on the latest jargon) on the injustices of the cotton ceiling:

Trans women are female. When our female-ness and womanhood is denied, as you keep doing repeatedly, that is transphobic and transmisogynist. As I said earlier, all people’s desires are influenced by an intersection of cultural messages that determine those desires. Cultural messages that code trans women’s bodies as male are transphobic, and those messages influence people’s desires. So cis queer women who are attracted to other queer women may not view trans women as viable sexual partners because they have internalized the message that trans women are somehow male.

The comparison to what cis males say also makes no sense. What trans women are saying is that we are women, and thus should be considered women sexually, and thus be considered viable partners for women who are attracted to women. What cis males are saying is that queer women shouldn’t be exclusively attracted to women, which is completely different. (The Cotton Ceiling? Really?, Femonade blog, 13th March 2012)

It’s not “completely different,” of course. In both cases, people with penises are “saying” (and willing) that real lesbians should have sex with them. In both cases, real lesbians would be encountering the male genitals of real men. But the trans-activist believes in an act of verbal transubstantiation whereby a trans-lesbian possesses a “female penis” that, despite all appearances, is “completely different” to the nasty and objectionable penis of a “cis male.”

Aspects of religious psychology

I use the term “transubstantiation” deliberately. It’s a term from Catholic theology that refers to the supernatural process whereby wafers and wine transform into the flesh and blood of Christ during the celebration of Holy Eucharist by a priest. No physical or scientific test can detect this transformation, and to all appearances the wafers and wine remain unchanged. But traditionalist Catholics will insist that the wafers and wine are now truly Christ’s flesh and blood. If you disagree, you’re probably safe nowadays, but you wouldn’t have been in the past. It was very unwise to openly deny, let alone ridicule, transubstantiation in Catholic nations during the Middle Ages. And disagreements over the concept were central to the murderous hatreds of the Reformation. Those who believed in transubstantiation got very angry when it was denied.

This anger, which is part of the odium theologicum, is an important aspect of religious psychology, whether overt or covert — leftism can in fact be explained as a mutation of Christianity and Judaism. Overt and covert religions gain power by demanding belief in things that defy everyday reality, because such belief is difficult and requires a greater emotional investment. When we invest more in a belief, we have more incentive to protect it more strongly. And it is precisely because concepts like transubstantiation and the “female penis” are absurd that they are powerful. When we have an emotional investment in something we can’t prove, we react strongly when it is denied or ridiculed. That applies even more when we ourselves are subconsciously aware or afraid that our beliefs are baseless or false. Crushing external heresies can be a way of stilling internal doubts.

The “female penis” vs the “unisex brain”

And so religion and other forms of ideology can gain power by their contradictions and absurdities. However, in the clash between transgenderism and feminism, both sides believe in absurdities: the trannies insist on the concept of the female penis, just as the feminists insist on the concept of the “unisex brain,” namely, that there is no genuine difference between male and female brains. These two concepts are both biologically absurd: there is no such thing as a female penis, but there is such a thing as a female brain. However, if transgenderism and feminism are both powered by absurdities, why have trannies been winning the battle over the TERFs? Well, it’s partly because the trannies have the bigger, and therefore better, absurdities. For example, the “female penis” is an obvious absurdity, the “unisex brain” is much less so. Penises are out in the open, after all, whereas brains are hidden behind the skull.

And there is a continuum between a typically male brain and a typically female brain that doesn’t exist between male genitals and female genitals in the vast majority of cases. The psychological differences between men and women are a question of averages and tendencies, but the physical differences are generally stark and obvious (inter-sex individuals are rare). A certain group of trannies also have the stronger male will-to-power and love of battle, which is another reason they are winning the battle with lesbians. All this explains why the left supports and celebrates trannies as they cross the border between male and female. As a sexual minority, they have higher status than ordinary women. As a novel and exhibitionist sexual minority, they also have higher status than lesbians, who also have less will-to-power.

Better than Black

Indeed, as I pointed out in “Power to the Perverts!,” transgenderism has allowed some White heterosexual men to leap above the Black-Jewish lesbian feminist Linda Bellos in the leftist hierarchy. The White men are “transgender” and Bellos, although Black, is a TERF. In current leftism, transgender trumps TERF. Leftists therefore support the border-abolishing White men and not the border-erecting Black woman.

However, leftists would instantly support Bellos if those White men were claiming to be Black rather than female. Leftists want the border between male and female abolished, but not the border between Black and White. Why so? Again I would argue that higher and lower status settle the clash of wills. Rachel Dolezal “willed” that she was Black, while Blacks “willed” that she wasn’t. Dolezal was trying to abolish a border, Blacks were trying to maintain one, so a naïve reading of leftism would say that leftists should support “trans-racialists” like Dolezal just as they support transgenderists like Bruce Jenner. But leftists didn’t support Dolezal, and Blacks easily won the battle of wills. The border between Black and White stayed up, and Dolezal was ridiculed and punished, despite being more convincing as a Black than most transgenderists ever are as women.

{Submitter’s note: Langdon rants on and on… see the source link if you’re really interested about the rest of it}

The Raunchous Brothers #sexist metal-archives.com

[lyrics to "Sexual Assault"]

You're such a fuckin' bitch
You gotta nice ass and you got big tits
But you won't give me the time of day
So I'm gonna have to force you to get me laid

Tonight you're lookin' pretty good
As I stalk you around the neighborhood
I trap you down a dark alley
Bitch don't even try to scream

You are of the weaker gender
I am a horny sex offender
Face it bitch, there's no escape
Tonight, you're gonna get raped

Smash your face in with a brick
Attack you with my fists and prick
Tears and blood run down your cheek
Typical woman, worthless and weak
You try to fight back, try to resist
I reward your efforts with my fists
That will fucking teach you not to say no
As you lie there bleeding with your torn off clothes

You are of the weaker gender
I am a pissed-off sex offender
Face it bitch, there's no escape
Tonight, you're getting raped

I committed sexual assault
But we both know it was all your fault
The truth is I had every right
Because you wear your clothes low-cut and tight
I forced my dick into your slit
But you had it comin', you asked for it
I even shoved my dick up your back door
And now your asshole is bleeding and your pussy is sore you whore

You are of the weaker gender
I am a pissed off sex offender
Face it bitch, there's no escape
Tonight, you got raped

CUNT!
I committed sexual assault (4x)
Oh you fucking cunt no means yes
And I can tell by the way you're fucking dressed
You know you love it, it's in I shove it
You fucking whore! RAPE!!!

ROBERT JENSEN #fundie feministcurrent.com

The art of avoiding definitions: A review of ‘Trans*: A Quick and Quirky Account of Gender Variability’

“Let me define the terms, and I’ll win any debate,” a friend told me years ago, an insight I’ve seen confirmed many times in intellectual and political arenas.

But after reading Jack Halberstam’s new book, Trans*: A Quick and Quirky Account of Gender Variability, I would amend that observation: Debates also can be won by making sure a term is never clearly defined. The transgender movement has yet to offer coherent explanations of the concepts on which its policy proposals are based, yet support is nearly universal in left/liberal circles. Whether or not it was the author’s intention, Trans* feels like an attempt at an outline of such explanation, but I’m sorry to report that the book offers neither clarity nor coherence.

I say sorry, because I came to the book hoping to gain greater understanding of the claims of the transgender movement, which I have not found elsewhere. Halberstam — a professor in Department of English and Comparative Literature and the Institute for Research on Women, Gender, and Sexuality at Columbia University — has been writing about this subject for more than two decades and is one of the most prominent U.S. trans* intellectuals. The table of contents looked promising, but the book only deepened my belief that a radical feminist and ecological critique of the transgender movement’s ideology is necessary.

Rather than be defensive about the ambiguity of the transgender argument, Halberstam celebrates the lack of definition as a strength of the movement, an indication that trans* offers deep insights for everyone. If we shift our focus from “the housing of the body” and embrace “perpetual transition” then “we can commit to a horizon of possibility where the future is not male or female but transgender,” he writes. Instead of “male-ish” and “female-ish” bodies we can realize “the body is always under construction” and “consider whether the foundational binary of male-female may possibly have run its course.”

The very act of naming and categorizing imposes limits that constrain the imagination, according to Halberstam, hence the use of the asterisk:

“I have selected the term ‘trans*’ for this book precisely to open the term up to unfolding categories of being organized around but not confined to forms of gender variance. As we will see, the asterisk modifies the meaning of transitivity by refusing to situate transition in relation to a destination, a final form, a specific shape, or an established configuration of desire and identity. The asterisk holds off the certainty of diagnosis; it keeps at bay any sense of knowing in advance what the meaning of this or that gender variant form may be, and perhaps most importantly, it makes trans* people the authors of their own categorizations. As this book will show, trans* can be a name for expansive forms of difference, haptic [relating to the sense of touch] relations to knowing, uncertain modes of being, and the disaggregation of identity politics predicated upon the separating out of many kinds of experience that actually blend together, intersect, and mix. This terminology, trans*, stands at odds with the history of gender variance, which has been collapsed into concise definitions, sure medical pronouncements, and fierce exclusions.”

I quote at length to demonstrate that in using shorter excerpts from the book I am not cherry-picking a few particularly abstruse phrases to poke fun at a certain form of postmodern academic writing. My concern is not stylistic but about the arguments being presented. After reading that passage a couple of times, I think I can figure out what Halberstam’s trying to say. The problem is that it doesn’t say anything very helpful.

To be fair, Halberstam is correct in pointing out that the instinct to categorize all the world’s life, human and otherwise — “the mania for the godlike function of naming” — went hand in hand with colonialism, part of the overreach of a certain mix of politics and science in attempting to control the world. But like it or not, humans make sense of the world by naming, which need not go forward with claims of imperial domination or divine insight. We define the terms we use in trying to explain the world so that we can meaningfully communicate about that world; when a term means nothing specific, or means everything, or means nothing and everything at the same time, it is of no value unless one wants to obfuscate.

But, if Halberstam is to be believed, this criticism is irrelevant, because transgenderism “has never been simply a new identity among many others competing for space under the rainbow umbrella. Rather, it constitutes radically new knowledge about the experience of being in a body and can be the basis for very different ways of seeing the world.” So, if I don’t get it, the problem apparently is the limits of my imagination — I don’t grasp the radically new knowledge — not because the explanation is lacking.

After reading the book, I continue to believe that the intellectual project of the transgender movement isn’t so much wrong as it is incoherent, and the political project is not liberatory but regressive. What this book “keeps at bay” is a reasonable, honest request: What does any of this mean?

In other writing — here in 2014 and again in 2016, along with a chapter in my 2017 book The End of Patriarchy: Radical Feminism for Men — I’ve asked how we should understand transgenderism if the movement’s claim is that a male human can actually be female (or vice versa) in biological terms. If transgender signals a dissatisfaction with the culturally constructed gender norms of patriarchy — which are rigid, repressive, and reactionary — I’ve suggested it would be more effective to embrace the longstanding radical feminist critique of patriarchy.

Rather than repeat those arguments here, I want to try another approach, stating simply that I have good reason to believe I’m real, that the human species of which I am a member is real, and that the ecosphere of which we are a part is real. That is, there is a material reality to the world within which I, and all other carbon-based life forms, operate. I cannot know everything there is to know about that material world, of course, but I can trust that it is real.

The cultural/political/economic systems that shape human societies make living in the real world complex and confusing, and the ways those systems distribute wealth and power are often morally unacceptable. But to challenge that injustice, it’s necessary to understand that real world and communicate my understanding to others in clear fashion.

In left/liberal circles, especially on college campuses, “trans*” increasingly is where the action is for those concerned with social justice. It offers — for everyone, whether transgender-identified or not — the appearance of serious intellectual work and progressive politics. Endorsing the transgender project is a way to signal one is on the cutting edge, and work like Halberstam’s is embraced in these circles, where support for the transgender movement is required to be truly intersectional.

My challenge to those whose goal is liberation is simple: How does this help us understand the real world we are trying to change? How does it help us understand patriarchy, the system of institutionalized male dominance out of which so much injustice emerges?

Halberstam likely would put me in the category of “transphobic feminism” for “refusing to seriously engage” with transfeminism, but I am not transphobic (if, by that term, we mean one who is afraid of, or hateful toward, people who identify as transgender). Nor do I refuse to seriously engage other views (unless we describe a critique of another intellectual position as de facto evidence of a lack of serious engagement). I am rooted in radical feminism, one of those “versions of feminism that still insist on the centrality of female-bodied women,” according to Halberstam.

On that point, Halberstam is accurate: radical feminists argue that patriarchy is rooted in men’s claim to own or control women’s reproductive power and sexuality. Radical feminists distinguish between sex (male XY and female XX, a matter of biology) and gender (masculinity and femininity, a matter of culture and power), which means that there is no way to understand the rigid gender norms of patriarchy without recognizing the relevance of the category of “female-bodied women.” It’s hard to imagine how the binary of male-female could “run its course” given the reality of sexual reproduction.

This is where an ecological perspective, alongside and consistent with a radical feminist critique, reminds us that the world is real and we are living beings, not machines. In discussing his own top surgery (the removal of breasts), Halberstam speaks of working with the doctor:

“Together we were building something in flesh, changing the architecture of my body forever. The procedure was not about building maleness into my body; it was about editing some part of the femaleness that currently defined me. I did not think I would awake as a new self, only that some of my bodily contours would shift in ways that gave me a different bodily abode.”

We all have a right to understand ourselves as we please, and so here’s my response: My body is not a house that was constructed by an architect but rather — like all other life on the planet — is a product of evolution. I resist the suggestion I can “build” myself and recognize that a sustainable human presence on the planet is more likely if we accept that we are part of a larger living world, which has been profoundly damaged when humans treat it as our property to dominate and control.

This is the irony of Halberstam’s book and the transgender project more generally. After labeling the project of categorizing/defining as imperialist and critiquing the “mania for the godlike function of naming,” he has no problem endorsing the “godlike function” of reshaping bodies as if they were construction materials. There’s a deepening ecological sensibility in progressive politics, an awareness of what happens when humans convince ourselves that we can remake the world and ignore the biophysical limits of the ecosphere. While compassionately recognizing the reasons people who identify as transgender may seek surgery and hormone/drug treatments, we shouldn’t suppress concerns about the movement’s embrace of extreme high-tech intervention into the body, including the surgical destruction of healthy tissue and long-term health issues due to cross-sex hormones and hormone-like drugs.

I have long tried to observe what in rhetoric is sometimes called “the principle of charity,” a commitment in debate to formulating an opponent’s argument in the strongest possible version so that one’s critique is on firm footing. I have tried to do that in this review, though I concede that I’m not always sure what Halberstam is arguing, and so I may not be doing his arguments justice. But that is one of my central points: When I read this book — and many other arguments from transgender people and their allies — I routinely find myself confused, unable to understand just what is being proposed. So, again, I’ll quote at length in the hopes of being fair in my assessment, this time the book’s closing paragraph:

“Trans* bodies, in their fragmented, unfinished, broken-beyond-repair forms, remind all of us that the body is always under construction. Whether trans* bodies are policed in bathrooms or seen as killers and loners, as thwarted, lonely, violent, or tormented, they are also a site for invention, imagination, fabulous projection. Trans* bodies represent the art of becoming, the necessity of imagining, and the fleshy insistence of transitivity.”

Once again, after reading that passage a couple of times, I think I understand, sort of, the point. But, once again, I don’t see how it advances our understanding of sex and gender, of patriarchy and power. I am not alone in this assessment; people I know, including some who are sympathetic to the transgender movement’s political project, have shared similar concerns, though they often mute themselves in public to avoid being labeled transphobic.

I’m not asking of the transgender movement some grand theory to explain all the complexity of sex and gender. I just need a clear and coherent place to start. Asking questions is not transphobic, nor is observing that such clarity and coherence are lacking.

"James" and his various sockpuppets #fundie mediamatters.org

So disgusting "James" was back on MMfA. Here're today's gems of wingnuttery.

• a few seconds ago

Obama niggér B747 • a minute ago

Your kind wishes GOP shot & killed.

Phil Montag, democrat was happy Majority Whip Steve Scalise was shot at a congressional baseball game practice and wished the Louisiana Republican was dead. How many of your kind celebrated with him?

Avatar
Obama niggér Indy • in a few seconds

What, still not good enough. Keep in mind, 90% of the time here is disrespecting his Eminence Trump.

Look at it in one of 2 ways.

Folks do it, coz they want it back

or

Since they do it, it must be ok.

Obama niggér B747 • a few seconds ago

I hate everyone.

Why do your kind hate gays?

bama niggér waggs03 • a few seconds ago

Because you suck trånny nigger cøck, thats why

•
Reply
•
Share ›

-
Avatar
Obama niggér Obama niggér • in a few seconds

LOL

Obama niggér StratRat • a few seconds ago

Do you suck off that cat?

Obama niggér • a minute ago

< < Michelle Obama

Michelle, please plow me in the ass with your ebola ridden trånny niggér cøck.

- Obama -

Obama niggér dld • a few seconds ago

So no real reason, except for your filthy degenerate diseased depraved sense of pig liberal logic

Obama niggér • in a few seconds

MMMM, liberals, who wants me to puke in your ass?

Afterwards I will ass fuck you.

Obama niggér GOPvsUSA3 • a few seconds ago

He had aids, was a liberal, had a trånny niggér fake cøck hanging out of his ass


Avatar
Red Rose • 3 minutes ago

03272017: Three Oklahoma kids, future liberals, thinking other folks property belongs to them, killed with an AR15.

Gotta love this. And we got away with killing your kind, AGAIN!

Red Rose BigBearcatBill • 10 minutes ago

Funny your kind think Bill is clean since he shoved cigars up a lil girl.

Your kind

Captain Freedom • 12 minutes ago

Liberals are OK with OJ Simpson being released into the public, after he has proven to not be reformed or repentant, by stealing cookies in prison and smirking about it

Red Rose solon • 17 minutes ago

You are nothing but a whiny cum laden queer.

Red Rose Finnibar87 • 17 minutes ago

And our dogs got blow jobs from you


Red Rose • 4 minutes ago

California liberal, Matthew Warner, convicted of fucking then murdering his 3 week year
old daughter. Just as the filthy degenerate depraved diseased pig liberals blame an entire state on the actions of one, the same must be done here. Maybe Matthew wanted the baby aborted, decided the baby needed raped, couldn’t wait for an illegal to do, so he did it.

Liberals, anything degenerate will do.

Red Rose • 7 minutes ago

TREASONUS LIBERALS BLOCKING TRAFFIC THREATENING CORRECT THINKING AMERICANS. CORRECT THINKERS RUN OVER DISEASED LIBERALS. NO CHARGES FILED AGAINST THE CORRECT THINKERS.

Red Rose • a minute ago

Nemias Garcia-Velasco, illegal alien, deported 7 times, drunk driving, kills father of three.

Thank you liberals for giving aid & comfort to illegal’s in sanctuary cities.

Liberals, anything degenerate will do.

ed Rose TMax01 • 9 minutes ago

So you suck cøck on school play grounds?

Red Rose JimWolf359 • a few seconds ago

Democrat State Senator Kevin de Leon calls democrats morally repugnant.

Democrat congress woman Corrine Brown faces fraud charges which could land her in prison for 300 years. Out of $800,000.00 she collected for its charity, only $2,400.00 was spent on charities. The rest she spent on its own filthy degenerate depraved disgusting pig liberal self.

Liberals, anything degenerate will do.

Red Rose • a few seconds ago

Dan Grilo, worked for both Hillary & Obama attacks Carryn Owens, widower of slain seal
William Ryan Owens, calling her an idiot. Your typical filthy degenerate depraved diseased disgusting mentally ill pig liberal.

Red Rose • 2 minutes ago

Rachel Anne Dolezal, a filthy degenerate depraved diseased pig liberal to pretended to be black to get a job at the NACCP, has changed its name to Amare Nkechi Diallo. Which means filthy degenerate trånny nigger in African.

What is wrong with filthy degenerate liberals these days?

Red Rose • a few seconds ago

Baltimore liberal Judge Nicole Taylor releases 18 year old man, after being arrested three times since January 1st for gun & drugs charges. This filthy liberal places no value on American lives as do the rest of liberals dont. It placed restrictions on this 18 year old male nigger, like 1am curfew, etc, etc, but did not think of protecting its fellow Americans from this thug. A day after this nigger was released it was running away from cops with a gun and in his hand. Justifiably the cop shot this thug three times dispatching him into the lap of God. What is wrong with filthy liberals, they give aid & comfort to illegal’s who kill their fellow Americans, now they are releasing thugs from jail to give them another
chance to kill us.

Red Rose • a minute ago

Nancy Piglosi & Elijah Cum in my ear, going on about scapegoat. Piglosi, “Do you know what a scapegoat is? It’s a goat, that we filthy liberals & fucked in the ass Democrats, cum & shit on, and fuck in the asshøle. Then we grease ourselves up, smear lipstick
on our åsses, and chase it down. And at the stroke of midnight, we eat it, while fisting ourselves.

Later, they apologized for letting out trade secrets.

MEGHAN MURPHY #sexist feministcurrent.com

Trans activism is excusing & advocating violence against women, and it’s time to speak up

Threats of violence against women branded as “TERFs” are increasing — will liberals and progressives speak out before it’s too late?

In January, a woman was photographed holding a sign at the Vancouver Women’s March that included the words, “Trans ideology is misogyny.” This might be viewed as a hyperbolic message for those who consider themselves good, liberal people and who care about a group they have been informed are in extreme danger, and particularly marginalized. And perhaps, if you were unfamiliar with the way women and feminists are addressed by trans activists, you might wonder what statements like this are rooted in. A few years ago, I might have questioned this as well, thinking, “well that’s a bit much, isn’t it.” But as trans activism has gained ground and as I myself — as well as many other women — have begun questioning and speaking out about the aims, ideology, and policies supported in the name of “trans rights,” it has become impossible to deny what is being supported through trans activism: violence against women.

Last week, photographs of an exhibit currently on display at the San Fransisco Public Library emerged online, depicting bloody shirts with the words, “I punch TERFs,” alongside baseball bats and axes, painted pink and blue to reference the gender ideology being touted, some covered in barbed wire, in order to amplify the grotesqueness of the threatened beating. The exhibit was set up by “Scout Tran,” a trans-identified male and founding member of the Degenderettes, a group that now has chapters throughout the United States. The group attends queer and feminist events, including the Dyke March, the Pride parade, and the Women’s March, carrying these weapons, which they claim as defensible activism, but is undeniably a visible threat and incitement to violence against women.

The threats attached to slogans like “I punch TERFs” are not theoretical. Earlier this month, a trans-identified male who goes by the name “Tara Wolf” was convicted of assault after beating 60-year-old Maria MacLauchlan, who had gathered with other women in Hyde Park to attend a meeting discussing gender identity ideology and legislation. Wolf had posted on Facebook about his desire to attend this gathering in order to “fuck up some TERFs.” In what other circumstance would anyone — self-identified progressives, in particular — defend viable threats of violence against women? Sadly, lots.

Liberals and the left have broadly defended violence against women as “art” or “sex,” though perhaps in a less overt way than they have outright threats of violence to feminists who wish to question or discuss the notion of gender identity. Pornography, for example, is one area where violence and abuse is consistently defended on account of it being “sex,” “fantasy,” or “free speech.” The ability of men and their allies to avoid viewing a woman being choked, hit, or gang-raped as “real violence” because it is connected to men’s desire and masturbation is without bounds. Similarly, the notion that a man offering a women financial compensation in exchange for permission to abuse her is framed time and time again as “consent,” regardless of the impact on that woman and the broader message this practice sends to all men and women, everywhere.

What is unique about the approach we’ve seen in the trans movement is that it doesn’t attempt to disguise the incitements to violence against women with rhetoric around “consent” and “empowerment.” The claim is not that this is not “literal” violence, because women like it, or because they consented to it, or because it’s “just fantasy.” Rather the violence advocated for by trans activists is said to be justified on account of opinions, associations, language, or the sharing of articles or links determined to be “wrong” — all of which is dishonestly framed as “violence” (ironic considering where the literal threats and violence are evidenced to be coming from).

The threats of violence against women, on account of having been branded “TERFs,” are frightening not only because we must fear for our physical safety or because of the way these threats act as a silencing mechanism, but because this violence is not being condemned, by and large, by most. Being forced to defend ourselves, alone, with few resources, media platforms, or influential public allies, due to the blacklisting that has occurred en masse in relation to this debate, is challenging, because our voices, interests, and well-being have already been dismissed as we are the baddies who deserve to die.

And indeed, this is where the connection between liberals’ and the left’s treatment of pornography, prostitution, and trans activism coalesce. The way that “TERF” has served to dehumanize women (Bad Women — women who speak unsayable truths and ask questions one is not meant to ask) in order to justify the gruesome violence they are threatened with operates in the same way women are dehumanized in pornography in order to pretend as though they aren’t truly being hurt or abused and, of course, in the same way women were branded witches in order to claim their torture was deserved, on account of their being wicked and dangerous.

Disagreement is not violence. This should not have to be said, yet apparently we must. Violence is violence. And when a group of people are actively advocating for and defending violence against another group of people — particularly an oppressed group of people, like women — there is no defense. At this point, those who accommodate this movement, as it is currently operating, are culpable of something very dangerous indeed.

While the San Fransisco Public Library removed the bloody shirt, they did not remove the exhibit entirely, nor do we know why anyone imagined such a display would be appropriate in the first place. One wonders if they would display bloody shirts with the words, “Kill bitches” or “I beat Muslims” next to a display of baseball bats and axes.

Will liberals and progressives stand up before this gets worse? I fear not.

Ethan Huff #transphobia #homophobia #fundie #wingnut naturalnews.com

Is it okay to call biological men who “self-identify” as “females” things like “gender confused” or “gender dysphoric?” How about people who decided to become “trans” and later reverted back to their original biological gender – should they even be acknowledged as existing? Not according to the Trans Journalists Association (TJA), which recently released a new style guide that pushes journalists to stop publishing “offensive” content that mentally ill transgenders say is “transphobic.”

According to the TJA, phrases like “biological gender” and “opposite sex” need to go because they supposedly exclude transgenders from the equation. Referring to one’s “biological sex” is also off-limits because transgenders want the world to think of them as actually being the opposite sex, even though their biological identities prove otherwise.

It is no longer permissible to write “man” or “woman,” either, because many transgenders do not consider such words to be “inclusive.” And instead of differentiating between “biological males” “trans males,” or “biological females” and “trans females,” the LGBTQ mafia instead wants journalists to write things like “people with ovaries” and “people with prostates.”

“The media bears a great responsibility when it comes to ensuring accurate and sensitive coverage of trans communities,” the new style guide states, adding that professional journalists have a responsibility “to begin to improve trans coverage” by using words that transgenders find acceptable.

“When you write the word women, are you including trans women?” the guide further asks. “Does it apply to non-binary people and trans men? Most reporting about health according to gender overlooks trans people and incorrectly equates anatomy to gender.”

Try as they might to redefine human biology, the trans cult is wrong in suggesting that “people with ovaries” can be anything other than women. The same goes for “people with prostates,” who are always men. If you are born a woman, then you have female reproductive organs. And if you are born a man, then you have male reproductive organs.

Sorry, LGBTQs, but that is an undeniable fact, no matter how much you try to bully the writing community into kowtowing to your delusions. There are only two genders: male and female. And there is no such thing as a transgender, which is just a mentally ill person with gender dysphoria who refuses to accept biological reality.

These statements alone are enough to get us banned from every major social media platform and search engine, but they represent the truth that the trans cult is unwilling to accept. In other words, this publication will not now, nor ever, take this new style guide seriously.

Collectingnasty #sexist #transphobia reddit.com

Why take trans seriously anyway? There is no such thin as a trans male or trans female. There is only feminine males and masculine females. Just because a person wants to behave in a manner stereotypical to an other sexual demographic doesn't entitle them to change their genetic sex.

I don't know enough about trans people for me to make a committed conviction, so I don't deny or accept the ideology or ideas about it

Gender are a set of socially constructed stereotypical behaviours. Most of these new genders are perversions or deviations. Ex: cross dresser is a typical deviation or perversion. But it is now referred to as gender queer which is now a gender. Next thing you know paedophiles with be classified as a gender

closetedxxcishet #fundie reddit.com

Countless times, I've seen trans people on social media utter the sentiment, "Your allies may act like they love and respect you, but if they don't truly see you as a real woman/man, they are your enemies!" The first time I saw this sentiment, it sent a chill down my spine. I was still doing my libfem handmaiden act at the time (even though I was uncomfortable with much of the ideology). It never occurred to me that I had to BELIEVE that people could change biological sex in order to be a decent person.

I couldn't bear the thought of being associated with those evil murdering TERFs! But was it possible that I had been an evil, murdering TERF all along? How many trans people had I forced into suicide? I mean, I had plenty of trans friends and I supported them, told them I loved them no matter what, supported their political goals, respected their pronouns, tried to educate others on their behalf, went to some trans activist events, insisted their interests were part of feminism....but I did not think they had changed biological sex....

Naturally, this is when I found out I had been lied to all along about what a "TERF" is. I realized how little it takes to be called a TERF, that TERF was used to excuse violence, and that to call a woman a TERF is to prosecute her for thought crime. I'm ashamed to admit it, but I was only able to see the madness of the movement when it was my twat on the chopping block. I had previously ignored and avoided anyone deemed a TERF and just accepted that they were awful people. I had to in order to a good libfem foot soldier. Everyone knows you aren't allowed to READ what these women write or HEAR what these women say, even if it's nothing to do with trans issues at all. They are permanently black balled from public discourse.

The issue of thought crime really planted the gender critical seed in my mind, but I kept trying to be a good little ally. I kept thinking that no one would KNOW I thought this and that the thought police were just extremists. Then, I tried to sit comfortably on the fence even though there was a huge post up my ass. I even tried to argue that there seem to be different levels of exclusion and some women don't believe in any exclusion of trans people, they just deep down in their hearts don't believe trans women and cis women are the same. Needless to say, that went over like a fart in church.

...and NO ONE deep down in their hearts sees trans woman as real women or trans men as real men. Whether they admit it is a different story, but I firmly believe NO ONE believes it. The ones that claim they do are just sparing themselves the agony of the Tranish Inquisition. This is why it is so crucial to prosecute thought crime, to suppress speech and writing, to threaten people who dare to be honest, to dehumanize people if they so much as retweet someone who dares to be honest.

The idea that you can commit violence by thinking a thought is beyond ludicrous...I mean, I know there was an episode of Voyager like that, but this is reality. Thankfully, trying to control thought is like trying to put toothpaste back in the tube. A whole lot of people will get really tired of being told that they MUST adopt another's orthodoxy or they are literally the bastard love children of an orgy between Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Leopold II, and Saddam Hussein. Sooner or later, the levee will break...and when the levee breaks, mama, you've got to move!

Italiangreyhound #sexist mumsnet.com

I think you have got it. The thing is I think you are feeling that this failure on my part to agree with you is based on some kind of dislike or whatever. It is just based in fact. I know what males are and I know what females are. And the vast, vast majority of the world conforms to this basic biological principle, with a very small number of people with medical conditions which vary. Males are socialized in our society in a different way and have different bodies to us, reproductively. Private areas like toilets and changing rooms (locker rooms) hospitals, medical wards etc are generally segregated by sex for the protection of females.

My understanding of these basic principles is just a fact and most people would, I feel sure, agree if they even guessed these basic truths were up for debate. What it does not mean is anything negative. I care about trans people, I know trans people, I want trans people to be safe, I want everyone to be safe. I honestly, honestly do. Males have a much, much higher rate of offending in violent and sexual crime than women. So any man who says he is a woman, is not female. He is a man who says this about himself. Now, I am not required by law to simply accept or believe what any person tells me about themselves.

If the law is changed to mean I need to believe any man who tells me he is now female like me, it will be a travesty. It will lead to danger for natal females and. I think, it will lead to a backlash against trans people, which I most certainly do not want. It does not mean I hate or dislike anyone. It means I do not believe you can change sex, and that is based on biology. I am genuinely sorry this is so difficult for a number of people but we cannot re-order society and ignore serious safeguarding issues because some people are uncomfortable in their sexed bodies. There are lots of trans people who understand this and agree with this position. This position is not anti-trans.

Femonade #fundie factcheckme.wordpress.com

women as a class are subservient to men as a class, then, due pretty exclusively to PIV.

now. gays and lesbians are vilified, under this system, because homosexuals fuck up the narrative (again, the narrative is, and must be, men fuck women, and women are fucked by men). see? regarding gay men, they make it too clear that men have asses that can be fucked. its not *just* women that can be fucked, men can be fucked too. but how is that supposed to work???!!!!!1 no, its not fucking unless women are fucked. its not “fucking” unless someone can die from it, unless someone can become pregnant. because fucking and female subservience are the same thing.

and lesbians fuck up the narrative too: they make it too clear that PIV is not inherently erotic, for women. so, they arent really women, at all. and what they are doing to and with each other isnt fucking. because its not fucking unless someone can die from it, unless someone can become pregnant. because fucking and female subservience are the same thing.

and i have kinda been harsh on transwomen in this series, but they fit in here too, dont they? because transwomen are men, and they have asses that can be fucked. they have fake fuckholes that can be fucked. but its not fucking unless someone can die from it, unless someone can become pregnant. because fucking and female subservience are the same thing. and its not a fucking coincidence, is it, that many times when a straight man murders a transwoman, its after he has fucked her (or right before), and finds out that shes not a woman? because the transwoman reminds him that he, too, has an ass, that can be fucked. that what they have just done or almost done together wasnt fucking or almost fucking, it was something “disturbing” in fact, because its not fucking unless someone can die from it, unless someone can get pregnant.

because fucking and female subservience are the same fucking thing.

transgender-uber-alles #sexist transgender-uber-alles.tumblr.com

rape has to do with power. transgender people are the most hated people in the world, therefore they have no power over cis people. so even if a trans person forces a cis person to have sex with them, it’s not rape. cis women can’t be raped by trans women. to suggest they can minimizes the struggles of trans women in society.

[How dare you how fucking dare you. I pray that one day u realize how much this hurts me and other survivors.]

im sorry you’re a forced-sex survivor and i wish you the best, but it wasn’t rape. the trans person who forced you to have sex with them is socially below you in terms of power, therefore did not rape you. sending you lots of love and i hope you get better soon image

vintologi #sexist #transphobia #quack reddit.com

Why you should transition

Becoming MtF tranny is a way better option than living another 40+ years as male incel.

Step0: watch tsf monogatari
step1: go to a gender clinic so you can get proper diagnosis.
step2: begin having fun with dildo, shove it up your ass.
step3: back up your sperm.
step4: start hormone replacement therapy.
step5: removal of unwanted hair.
step6: facial feminization surgery.
step7: social transition.

The experience of becoming female

Honestly this was even harder to decide to post than my attempt to be gay 8+ months ago. Because the implications and outcomes have been completely different. The experience has been completely different.

Disclaimer: Before all of this I 100% completely identified as a man, a man's man type of internal mindset. Very heterosexual. And gay stuff just did nothing for me. It was only out of desperation and having the right features that I attempted this gender transition. By right features I mean I was only 5'8 starting out and had a 2.7 inches erect penis. Plus all my facial features are feminine and I was pretty cute even as a guy. With 4 inches to my height and dick I could have been a normie or even chad lite. Yet reality is cruel sometimes. Since being on hormones I have lost some height, so I'm closer to 5'7 now, a true manlet if I ever decide to return to manhood.

I have been on estrogen for about 6 months now. It all started when I got my new therapist three months before that. Who referred me to a new general practitioner he knows. Obviously I told him nothing about being incel or hating females. Only that I always felt like a girl, which was a massive lie. I just wanted to get hormones to attempt a gender transition and hopefully become attracted to dudes like the other trans on reddit. Who so ironically betray themselves and their cause by casually posting truth.

I just want to say for the record I don't believe in any of the trans bullshit about being born that way. Maybe an exceptionally small amount of them are. Yet if you read their forums or subs its so extremely common how many of them are just guys who wank to shemale porn and have autogynephilia. The vast majority almost always speak about how their brains get changed by hormones. Further proving they are truly male in the brain. Basically they are mostly cross dressing fetishists. Maybe a very few of them really were born with a fucked up brain but its hard to weed out the liars. Since the fake trans just copy what the real trans say. Yet they let it slip in their posts how much they love tranny porn or wanking their she cocks. Not that it matters, more trans is always a good thing. Less beta orbiters and sometimes even trans that are hot.

The month after that things got even more intense. It was clear to me that females experienced sex with far more joy than men. Its like having a dick with sensory feelings that reaches all through up the body and hooks in the heart. My first experience with a guy was a non chad friend, who knew I had started a transition and thinks I am actually trans. We didn't have sex or even oral but we kissed a few times and cuddled for a few hours. It was magical, the cuddles were even better than the endless orgasms. Waves upon waves of mental emotion mixed with sexual waves of pleasure. Its so extremely addicting.

I'm beyond words enjoying my experience on female hormones. I still hate females, cucks, and chads. This is the turning point for me. If I don't quit now I will probably end up sterile and unable to break this intense addiction to female hormones and to men. Finishing transition will take work but leads to a life of happiness. Not finishing means going back to a hell after experiencing a heavenly paradise the likes of which I could have never imagined.

I feel like any choice I make is life wrecking but I was already totally fucked to begin with. Its so fucked up to crave men, to think of being dominated by them. My brain so fucked up on female hormones its telling me it would feel amazing to swallow semen and get creampied. I only have one cuddle buddy right now but I think about cuddling other guys too.

Things look potentially so good, at least better than when it was hopeless. I don't know if I can ever go through with having my genitals cut off. I just have like a mental block over such a barbaric surgery. I think I could live fine with just having male parts. I partially identify as female but know deep down I'll always be a man because men are awesome.

I could see this as being the best cope for manlets who are cute. As long as their face isn't too masculine. I'm not saying its perfect, it has downsides like having to pee more. Its still a lot better than being incel forever.

some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: PSA: Trannies are organizing on Discord to recruit vulnerable youngcels into their weird feminization cult. Please upvote this so people are made aware

image

(RareRaspberry6)
i don't like transphobia, almost all of them ended up like that because they were too ugly to get a gf just like everyone else on here, and no one in their friends circle (if they even had one) or family intervened to help them, they are victims. this is why almost all transexuals are male-to-female and not the other way around. that's just what happens when you're male and society rejects you for no reason. you end up developing weird interests and killing yourself at age 30.

don't bully them please. they are suffering

(sodomcel)
a lot of people that get sucked into this shit tend to be retards. it's pretty obvious trannies are trying to get as many young males into becoming trannies themselves because it reinforces their fucked up view of themselves and further emboldens their equally fucked up abomination of existence. trying to make yourself into a trap isn't going to change your genetics and that "man gut" is coming one day

(Toxic_Manlet)
I love how they use hyper feminine cartoon characters to depict themselves. No, you look like a bunch of trannies, some of you balding ffs. I mean if you could actually become an real woman I’d even consider it as an alternative to roping, if only to mess with simps and orbiters

(shattered_dome)
Feminization is a massive fetish in anime adjacent communities and this is all the trans-cult is, a group of people with a predatory fetish that somehow managed to to gaslight mainstream culture in to shielding it. Imagine if any other weird fetish, like those people who swim in septic tanks for example, managed to get the support of mainstream media and big corporations?

This is what you need to keep in mind when you talk to trans people, especially MtF who have any interest or past with anime. You are talking to a victim who will most likely seek to reenact their trauma on another.

(PvtJamesRyan)
I feel like I’m living in the twilight zone ever since I discovered the incel community, just seeing all the incel theories, even the craziest, proven true one by one. First, we had the crazy incel theories about how lesbianism is largely a charade and lesbians would turn straight for chad. We got absolutely slaughtered on Reddit for this theory. Then an inceltears defector posted a crazy study showing that lesbians were twice as likely to get pregnant than straight women, thus proving incels right and BTFO ever single Redditor. Next we had incels talking about how transvestism is just caused by gynocentricity and men just wanting to enjoy female privilege. Incels got rubbished again on Reddit because we dared to suggest women were privilege. Now it appears we have been proven right again. I am not kidding, I think incels May be the smartest people alive on earth today.

What worries me is that incels have a couple of apocalyptic theories of how the world would turn out, and judging from their flawless track record, these would probably come true. Let us never forget that incels predicted metoo months before it happened. For those who remember r/incels, there was a series of threads where incels predicted women would go en masse on social media to accuse normies who touches them in the past for raping them because all forms of contact by an ugly Male is rape. Inceltears went on a ramalage calling incels paranoid and that “normal people don’t accuse people of rape just because they ugly you just have a toxic mindset reeeee”. A few months later, the metoo phenomenon was born.

(blackpilloverdose)
The frustration builds and the sadness creeps but unless you have been feeling like this since childhood you are just being lied to

By your own doing

Few of them are able to become the women they desire because unless you do hormones since before puberty you can’t be a believable woman that can wear anything in the stores most women want to shop in

At best you are imitation crab meat when what you really need to be is the real deal and you can’t

They will never look like the girl they desire to be

(Not_Always_A_Menace)
Disgusting. Trannies are fucked in the head. I can’t believe society is trying so hard to grovel at their feet and at the same time force acceptance of them into everyone else. And it’s all in the name of...what? Being “progressive?” Fuck that noise. This isn’t progressive. It’s regressive.

It’s only going to get worse from here.

(BrazilianNigma)
I don't know who is the ultimate mindmaster behind this but this is another way to fuck with real men. I just found out a while ago that transgenders were dating straight men (some of whom were """transphobic"""") who obvs didnt know that they were dating a mutilated man. This is what we have to look forward to if we even have a remote chance of ascending, not only are we competing for the ugliest, lowest actual female scraps any vaguely attractive foid we might find has a high chance of being male. It's over. It's fucking over

thanks for the heads up tho, most high iq posters here won't fall for that shit. It's probably the faggots at cucktears who are more likely to be trans

(Take_Me_Back_Please)
they honestly are delusional if they think they look like those anime girls in real life. most of these "traps" cover up their faces and filter-up when they take photos because deep down they know they still look like an ugly dude in drags

99% of all traps are UGLY!

(Blanketfish)
Not that Trans are my cup of tea. But one thing I find funny is that MtF trans can get money for webcamming, dominate sports, even fucking win beauty pageants. Proving that being a woman is easy mode. As for FtM, they learn how fucking hard it is to be a man, the are even generally manlets, dickcels (obvious), and framecels.

(droppedmyvcard)
If I could actually become an actual real woman with two X chromosomes and a vagina and a womb then I would. I would switch to easy mode midway through the game because the game sucks and is stacked against me.

But it is not possible. I have no desire to mutilate my genitals, have a fake "vagina" that is a constantly bleeding pus-filled wound that is forever trying to close, a masculine skeleton and facial structure, deep voice, Adam's apple, big feet, etc. The research shows that post-op transexuals are not any happier, and the rate of suicide goes up.

I think it's really sad how many are being misled by our feminized society into ceasing being men, but not really becoming women either, just becoming these sad depressed mutilated people who are in-between genders and have even less chance of finding love because neither gay men nor straight women want them, with a few exceptions.

No offence...

(TheRealUncleRuckus)
I like trannies. Honestly, I think trannies are hotter than cisgender females. I just wish they were proincel rather than antiincel. In the tranny lover community we have a saying that, every single female in the future will have a dick. This is because when there will be technology to be able to produce a babe from two sperm and outside the uterus, no one will want a dick-less girl.

Museum_Of_Strange #sexist reddit.com

I think most white people are like you were, blissfully ignorant of the dating struggles of minority males. A white Normie lives in a world in which anybody can get anybody, regardless of race. They don't realize that they are projecting their experiences onto others and can not picture a world in which their race would be detrimental to their dating mating pursuits. It's like a middle class American person saying "fuck those refugees ! Go fight for your damn country you cowardly fucks!" They cannot understand the horror of war and poverty because their lives have been fundamentally different from that of the refugees. A white Normie cannot get it. Race is an obstacle.
I also find it disgustingly ironic how normies will be so anti racist and anti bigot until sexual preferences get involved. "Equality" "anti bigotry" "fairness" all of those empty platitudes they spew get chucked clean out of the window once mating is the subject of interests. Then it's "biology" and "nature". I saw a post on one of those subreddits that likes fucking with incels once, they were talking about some post that brought racial preferences up, all of a sudden, all the "progressives" were talking about racial preferences being totally fine and natural, absolutely nothing wrong with them. Of course not acknowledging the fact that sexual preference is a form of bigotry. Anti racism, anti bigotry, egalitarianism, gender equality are all fucking memes. When push comes to shove, people are racist. Some white liberal Cunt will experiment with some minority when she's drunk off her Ass in college so she can tell her self she's "open-minded" and "bridging the racial divide" and post "another proud black man shot, fuck white people, fuck colonialism, the white man is a virus, it's (current year) racism needs to stop" then go to her 95% white frat party a few hours later and laugh at the Asian PUA "gaming" white women. She'll marry some slightly attractive white dude, Shit out some kids and coincidentally move into a 70%+ white area. When Shit hits the fan, people are sexist. Women will never be sent into a battle zone of a legitimate war, they will never be given any significant control over anything that could decide the fate of humanity, they will never have to actually be treated like the average man (a commodity, a piece of the machine).
It's right in all of our faces, people are racist, people are sexist, egalitarianism is a fucking lie. Normies just go "LALALAALLALALALALALALA, I can't see you, I can't hear you!" And this is why I can't stand these fuckers. Normies, the bubbles of privilege you have occupied your entire existence has given you the ability to act like the world is only as bad as those near your level of privilege, oh how much do I hope that bubble is one day popped.

Kei 2.0 #sexist gendertrender.wordpress.com

Notice all this sexual harassment and death threats towards lesbians, never gay males and straight people, who are not being told to change their terms and being physically threatened with not wanting to sex ”trans people”. Even if women stopped using the terms ‘Woman’, ‘Female’, ‘Lesbian’, and created more private groups. GBT++ would take whatever new terms are created. Lesbian groups and events are already shut down for publicly advertising and meeting.

Lesbian youth online saying from GBT++ org. they’re confused and suicidal about not being supported for simply being lesbians, and sexually harassed and bullied for not wanting to sex ”trans males or “trans women”. Butch lesbians are harassed if they refuse to ”trans” to straight males. ”Transing” dead lesbians like biracial butch lesbian Stormé DeLarverie who was present during Stonewall Riots. The few lesbian role models/celebs, they’re staying quiet to assimilate with straight people, so we already know what side they’re on. (Not speaking of lesbians who are being physically threatened or who would lose their jobs for speaking out).

Replacing ‘Lesbian’ with non binary, queer, ‘they, them’ $hit. The lesbian youth who think LGB history was created the year they were born through various social media that they created. Yes, lets get the L out by leaving the GBT+++ behind.

Irate_Lesbian_Daemon #sexist reddit.com

This is a gender critical sub. This is an anti-gender sub.
So why the fuck are we not only allowing, but WELCOMING WITH OPEN ARMS; TIMs who claim to be "transsexual" and "not like the others," TIMs who say they don't believe they're biologically female but still insist on dressing up like women and pretending to be one, TIFs who want to be a "trans inclusive radical feminist"

So, people of this sub act like being transgender is a misogynist and homophobic act, which it is. Until, of course, a trans person comes along and says "n-not all TIMS! waah! i'm a good guy" and suddenly you guys are like OMG HOLY SHIT, LISTEN TO THIS FUCKING ORACLE OF WISDOM! SEE! NOT ALL TIMS ARE BAD! WE MUST LISTEN TO OUR GAY GENDER CRITICAL BRETHREN!

Yet a woman shares a slightly different opinion and she is shunned.
Yet a non-trans male simply makes a post and he's told to leave.

But sure, these creepy ass "transsexuals" can rub their dicks all over this sub with ill intent and it's all fine! Totally ignoring the fact that the majority of "truscum" are right wing MRA types! Yeah!

Wristlet 2 #transphobia incels.co

(a comment on this post bashing Skidie)

trannies are so fucking disgusting man :feelspuke:

and that's a TRANS MAN

don't fall for the soy narrative, it's the other way around: men pretending to be women = trans men, foids pretending to be male = trans women

also trannies seem to always resort to violence threats when their delusions get threatened. they also even threaten violence against real women which is just bizarre

bob #fundie bobstruth.blogspot.ca

Has ANY female EVER been hurt by rape?

When Bob's mother was growing up the advice or rape that women of Bob's grandmother's generation gave them was "If rape is inevitable, you might as well lie back and enjoy it." Feminists have decried this age-old female advice. It perpetuates ancient female knowledge that sex is a normal body activity that can be enjoyable, even if it wasn't her idea. Many years later Bob learned that the counselor's training manual at a local Rape Crisis Center contains advice for counselors to deal with women who enjoyed the rape and had screaming wild orgasms during the rape. Often, according to the manual, it leaves them confused about whether or not they are really a "victim" or a beneficiary of the rape.

Over several decades Bob has known several women who supposedly were raped, or legally were raped. For example, Bob once dated a young woman whose first sexual experience was being raped by a Catholic Priest at the age of 19. She was confused about the theological and religious implications, but she liked the sex well enough to give up celibacy and take up with men like me. One of the young females in Bob's high school had been doing sex with her uncle about once a week since she was 11 years old, and thoroughly enjoyed it. Legally, it was one of the most harshly prosecuted kinds of "rape" despite the lack of harm. The last time Bob saw her she was a well adjusted 29 year old wife and mother who still occasionally met her uncle for sex, and still enjoyed every hot fucking bit of it. The fictional rape of Scarlet by Ret Butler made Gone With the Wind into the best selling novel of all time, and rape continues to be a dominant theme in most female's chosen fiction.

Meanwhile the feminazi has condemned rape as the worst possible crime. Their rape-hate propaganda campaign has made virtually all sex into rape and all men into evil rapists. Any man convicted or who pleads guilty to a rape crime is vilified for life. Forever he must register his location with the blue gun thugs, have his neighbors notified, and not live near any normal location. Often he is driven out of town, every town. And the definition of "rape" has been expanded to include every sexual encounter that the female regrets the next day or the next year. Sex with young women is defined as "rape" for the purpose of vilifying young men, even while the woman is the active sexual aggressor. Sex is defined as "rape" by law when the female has had a few drinks for the purpose of vilifying young men, while a man is responsible for all of his actions such as sex or driving, even when he drank more than she did. An encounter where she went to his hotel room at midnight for the purpose of sex is called "rape" for the purpose of vilifying young men, if she didn't enjoy it as much as she hoped she would. And while it's not "rape" the playful or incidental touching of a girl by a 6 year old boy is now prosecuted criminally as "sexual abuse."

Over the past several decades Bob has read probably thousands of news stories about "rape," known several females who claimed to have a "my rapist," but Bob has never met a woman who suffered any actual harm from rape, by any definition. Now we are not talking about murder of battery which are different crimes. All you hysterical femorrhoids who immediately switch mentally from "rape" to serial murder can back off. Murder is a different topic. We are talking about rape, the forced sexual joining of a man and a female. The humping up and down without her controlling the man and the situation.

We are also not talking about the pain that some virgin women feel during their first sex. Virginal pain is normal to being female and sex regardless of the circumstances. Normal sexual feelings are irrelevant to the topic of rape.

In Bob's experience from talking to many females, the female often got hurt feelings from rape, mostly from the loss of control over the man and the situation. Often feminist females hold onto and nurse their hurt feelings for years or decades, refusing to let it go, waiving "my rapist" like a flag for admission to the feminist victimology club, much like DAR applicants pointing to "my ancestor." But were they hurt by the rape? Other than a few hurt feelings, not at all.

The counselor's guide for the Rape Crisis Center teaches counselors how to convince well fucked women that they are "victims!" when they had a good time getting laid. Grandmother's "relax and enjoy it" would be good advice to many who phone the Rape Crisis Center. But the femorrhoids who staff the Center work in the rape-hate industry. Every rape is a fate worse than death and the female is destroyed for life (don't ask them how). There are many urban legends about some female who almost died from the injuries suffered by rape, but like other urban legends nobody is able to track down who or where it actually happened. The so-called victims are encouraged to dwell on their victimhood, to amplify and magnify, to seek counseling in order to wallow in their hurt feelings. Having a good time and letting it go just isn't acceptable to those who use rape as a weapon in their hate war against men.

Bob has never met or known any woman who was hurt by rape other than a few hurt feelings which would go away quickly if they weren't fed and amplified over and over and over. Let's face it. The insertion of a cock into a cunt is a normal, natural body function for both the man and the female. It's how cunts work and what they do. It's their normal function. There are two billion or more women on earth who, on average, enjoy sex ever week or two. That means that a million women somewhere in the world are enjoying the insertion of a cock into their cunts right now as you read this article. It just doesn't cause physical injury to the female no matter who decided that now would be a good time to do it.

How about you readers? Do you know any female who was actually hurt by being raped, by being forced to accept a man's cock in her cunt? If you do please let us know with specifics, not urban legends. Leave out the mass murder scenarios too, that's murder, not rape. Bob just doesn't think rape actually hurts anyone and therefore is not is a serious crime at all. What do you all say?

Some Pinkpillers #sexist #psycho reddit.com

RE: Is it something wrong with male children now too?

(Consider_The_Horses2)

There absolutely is something wrong with male children. And this something is not just caused by socialization but - at least partly - also by their male biology. Young boys very clearly exhibit the desire to fight, to dominate, and to destroy whom they consider beneath them. It is not uncommon for young boys to rape and abuse - their sisters, for instance. https://i.redd.it/mkwy8ufokm051.jpg Men have basically evolved to rape and kill and male children are already practicing. And these days, they start watching rape porn and calling women "sluts" and "thots" online when they are 10 or 11-years-old already, anyway...

Personally, I've come to hate male children just as much as I hate men: https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillFeminism/comments/gnuqgl/ive_come_to_hate_boys_just_as_much_as_i_hate_men/

They should be thaugth to be more friendly

Women are always expected to "help" males and to sacrifice themselves in order to raise males. I am opposed to this. It hasn't worked out in the past, and it won't work out in the future. The only thing it has resulted in - the only thing this argument was designed for - was to make women responsible for the bad actions of men and make women sacrifice their time, their energy, their well-being to "help" the very males who want to oppress and rape them.

You adult men, you go ahead and teach boys not rape, not to objectify women, not to watch porn, not to glorify prostitution, not to oppress women, not to "slut-shame" them, etc.

You know most men in the world wont rape you. "Helping" boys is raising them. Do it right with other people. Give them a positive influence. Teach them about normal feminism and not radical. Let them know how they should be treated and how to treat women.

Normal feminism is nothing but misogyny. Men define "normal" feminism as a feminism that allows them to continue all the shit they've done for centuries - but this time using "woke" rather than Christian vocabulary to justify it.

No it's not misogyny. Normal feminism as that guy said is woman's rights, to become equal to males. Not to kill them all and become a species that will very quickly become extinct because females won't evolve without males. Feminists from the past are the people who got you the rights you have today. So don't dis them because you shouldn't deserve what they gave their life for.

The goal is female liberation from male oppression, not "equality" with rapists, murderers, pedophiles, and oppressors.

(censorshipment)

A chilling story about two 10 year old boys who kidnapped, tortured, raped and murdered a 2 year old toddler for fun. One of them was arrested as an adult later due to possession of CP(shocker). [NSFW] - https://np.reddit.com/r/BlackPillFeminism/comments/h84ulp/a_chilling_story_about_two_10_year_old_boys_who/

I did not know that. I personally think not every 10yr old boy have the instinct to murder and torture young kids. But, What do i know. I can only speak of my experience when i was 10yrs old

The best way to prevent males from harming females is sex-based separation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Kayla_Rolland

6 year old boy shot and killed a 6 year old girl at school because she rejected him. Could've been prevented if schools weren't integrated. Sure, you can say could've been prevented if his uncle didn't have guns in the house. But it's just better to separate females from males.

But doesnt females harm males aswell? Think about hoe much more boeing life would become without males. Basically forcing everyone to be lesbian.

Not at the same rate as males who harm females. Heterosexuality is a disease. Women need to evolve.

So you say avery woman on the planet is superior to men?

Fuck off.

(CloacaDiddler)

Boys 10-12 have higher rape statistics than every age of women. Just the preteens. I can barely even retell the story of Junko Furuta kidnapped by a few 14 year old boys and put through the worst torture imaginable for months until she finally died of her injuries. Not to mention little boys tend to be violent, unruly, and show affection by hitting.

You people are deranged. Fuck you and your campaign to feminize little boys. Boys are different than girls, they're not supposed to be these little quiet robots that you shove information into. They're learning machines, they're exploring their environment as all babies do. Just because they're more prone to being unruly (mostly due to the uneven distribution of ADHD among the two sexes), does not mean they are inherently evil.

Citing rare instances of boys doing horrible things is fucking nuts and you know it, I can easily find female equivalents. You people need to delete this sub or honestly just rope, there is no hope for leeches on society who sit on reddit and hate on men, deranged idiots.

Rare instances???

Yes dumbass. Are you really implying that all boys rape someone when they're a preteen?

Why is it all or nothing with you guys.

I’ve already stated that boys between 10-12 rape more people than all age categories of women do...that’s not all, but that’s not rare and it’s so hilarious when y’all try to refute this. Just like how men make up about 24% of teachers nationally but 78% of student sex crimes. Because y’all always love to say how “women rape students just as much as men” but no, they fucking don’t. Women don’t X anything as much as men, not all of them do horrible things but way more do than women do

That's because of the toxic culture that implies young boys should enjoy sex from older women. All the sex scandals from my highschool were exposed not because of reporting, but because someone else found out. Usually it's the parents.

The same way there used to be stigma around women reporting sexual assaults (which is now mitigated by all the awareness movements; sexual assault cases against men have skyrocketed), there is also a stigma against male victims. Once that is broken there will be a surge of reports on female rapists.

But you toxic fuckers make that impossible with your "male violent and bad, woman innocent and pretty amd good" mindset. What a bunch of narcissistic and uneducated jack-offs.

I couldn't count the amount of second-hand embarassment I got whilst reading posts/comments where "pink pilled" psychos were circle jerking about female superiority. And you know what's funny? Mens rights subs don't allow misogyny, yet misandry is the basis of all feminist subs. What an embarassment honestly...

Jesus Christ feminists are the ones against all rape, I’ve only ever heard men encourage students to get with adult teachers. Even had a coworker speak up unprompted to tell me how he believed men could never be raped unless the woman was ugly, and that students were lucky to get with a teacher. If you think it was “just one guy” and are blind to the massive culture of men especially online who feel this way, then obviously you must not believe that all women are the ones supporting this, isn’t that right?

Nisselue #fundie escapistmagazine.com

[on Polanski]

Let's see, 13 year old girl raped 40 years ago, people running around screaming RAPE, RAPE!!!
You guys don't have anything more important to worrie about? Like 1 - 2% of the american population sitting in prison? About 20.000 children starving to DEATH each day etc?

But as usual young girl (and we know females are made out of glass) together with sex and we are all running around like monkeys screaming and crying and don't know what the fuck to do.

@Mcoffey Why do you care if he is a threat to the society (fancy words)? He doesn't live in the US anymore, he is not gonna rape anymore of your women so why do you care? Are you as upset about children starving to death each day as you are about this insignificant rape?

And i gotta say it was a stupid move to rape a 13 year old in the US, cause he could just have moved to Spain and

some TERFs #sexist reddit.com

Re: AskTG eats itself over one mod telling the others not to flash their dicks in the women's change room.

(party_of_fire)
It takes a while to figure out but essentially the AskTG flashers are now furious at mod Wannabkate for saying Enbie is a slur {hahahahahaha they can't even keep up with what's supposed to be offensive this week} and for telling the subreddit that you shouldn't flash your dicks at women in the change room.

Telling mentally deranged men to not flash their cocks at unsuspecting girls and women in the female change room is the height of discrimination and bigotry in [Current Year]. Jesus. Fucking. Christ.

I'm honestly surprised Trumpsters haven't begun using this example (and the never ending list of trans fuckery) in an attempt to win the midterms. How many right wing autogynephiles does the GOP have donating to them?

(minimal-menace)
Part of the compilation is a thread called

"[META] Trans Women Need Trans Women Mods - Can We Get Some?"

Affirm whatever we say! Now affirm it harder!

Who do they think has always been running that sub? Now they're aghast that occasionally they're disagreeing among themselves?

The assumption that it must be outsiders, meddlers, women deleting their posts is just so sad.

Everything is really so us-versus-them on that sub, and it leads to such a damaging, culty mentality.

(Einsamax)
Trans groups have been divisive for as long as I can remember. I remember making a post in a non-trans related group and a roving band of most likely self identified trans people dog piled on one of my posts where I said I didn't want my identity to just be "TRANS!" and that I wanted to be respected for being a good person.

In trans subreddits I usually get downvoted for saying that I am able to have a civil conversation here. Funny how much can be achieved when you don't go looking for a fight. Don't get me started on the thinly veiled, sometimes full on, death threats that are directed towards the people of this sub. Loving and tolerant my ass.

(baremon7)
Your comment is so on, it is unbelievable how these men actually think.

"Telling mentally deranged men to not flash their cocks at unsuspecting girls and women in the female change room is the height of discrimination and bigotry in [Current Year]. Jesus. Fucking. Christ."

I think some of them just realized how many of them are there just to entertain themselves with tormenting unsuspecting women just out in public with their families. Normally, these men would have no right, opportunity or reason to legally flash a boner and stalk these frightened women around a locker room for a thrill

(Snuggle_Kitty_AGoGo)
From what I’ve read they hate them for being against Nature and masculinity. And for entering young girls spaces. Only the incels seem to love da tranz. Rednecks seem to also hate incels.

(Mountains_beyond)
There are plenty of right wing sites that post about trans insanity- the bl@ze, d@ily caller, etc. It’s yet another “men on the right see women (and children) as private property, men on the left see women as public property’ issue.

Right wingers don’t want those nasty pervs around their women, unless the pervs are GOP candidates or donors. Men can do whatever they want in their own home, of course. They also see it as a wedge issue to make liberals look crazy, which is unfortunately true.

(Quixoticfutz)
Assuming you meant "private" in one of those, I completely agree.

Unfortunately true, I'm an avowed leftist and having to constantly argue with both left and right is exhausting, hell I even argue with centrists.

Can I make this job? At least I'd get payed.

(party_of_fire)
The creepy guy who offers hormones to children doesn't think you should flash your dick fellas

Because women have the right to privacy from strange men and the right to not have dicks shoved in their faces at every opportunity? No, pffft! Of fucking course not! It's because it doesn't look good for the community. They have to wait for it to be legislated first and then everyone can get their rape on.

Does DrewiePaedo really think that laws allowing this shit aren't going to be revoked after complaints of girls being exposed to the microdick of pervs like "Autumn"?

(FuzzyFakeFur)
Anyone have a link to the locker room post?

Edit: Okay, so I found it. And .... this:

"You notice how no one gets up in arms about trans men using the men's room? Because nobody actually gives a shit what goes on in men's rooms."

WHICH MEANS YOU SHOULD GO BACK TO USING THE MEN'S ROOM, DICKHEAD. But they're embarrassed of how they dress, so they won't change in there.

innocent_butungu & Administrative_Worth #sexist #homophobia #transphobia reddit.com

image

(innocent_butungu)

Can lesbians be incel? I'm honestly not sure, we need some high-IQ-cels to conduct a scientific study.

If lesbians existed, probably. But reality is lesbians do not exist. Lesbians are just etero girls going bisexual for shit and giggles.

The only true lesbians are basically FtM trans without gender dysphoria

(Administrative_Worth)

Reminder that women can get women easier than us. And most have already at some point.

So fucking true. Women's preference for fuckng goes chad, chad-lite, and high tier stacies. Stacy's becky's. 5.5/10 guys, Dogs, and then genetic trash both male and female. Male, below 3.5 women see you as trash, foids, below 2.5 you're genetic trash.

sp8der #transphobia reddit.com

Having a penis means you are a man. There is no such thing as a female penis.

Question, how do you define those who have XX chromosomes but have a penis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XX_male_syndrome#:~:text=XX%20male%20syndrome%2C%20also%20known,that%20can%20vary%20among%20cases.
Are they a man or are they a

Per the name of the page you're linking, the answer would seem to be male.

Regardless, extreme edge cases don't and shouldn't define broad rules. Over-specificity will render otherwise useful concepts useless through inflation.

"Cats have four legs" is a true species-level statement even given the existence of mutated or amputee cats.

There's also a tendency to fall into the univariate fallacy when discussing this. That because one magic vector that neatly cleaves the groups cannot be found, the groups themselves are invalid. This is patently false, traits can be clustered.

If an object matches 5/6 characteristics of Item A and 1/6 of Item B, which is it more likely to be? Which of the two boxes do you put it in when sorting?

Ok what about a woman who through surgery to attach a penis. Is this person a man or a woman?

More difficult. It depends on the rest of the cluster of traits, doesn't it? While that's a strong indicator in one direction, whether it's enough to balance out the rest has to be taken as an individual case.

I agree, there should be some flex in what determines who is a man and who is a woman, you seem to be against this.

Some flex maybe, not 100% flex. But my point was more that categories are rarely ever neat but they must be coherent, at the very least. Simply identifying as X is not enough to become X. And defining X as "ABC", without regard to exceptions, is more broadly useful to people everyday than strictly defining X as "ABC, except when D, but also ACE, unless F, or ABD in which case look at GH in conjuction with AB to determine if C."

I agree yet you seem so focussed on saying that this rule doesn't apply to trans people.

I suppose the corollary is that, as I said above, I don't consider all traits to have equal "weight" when determining what category to put someone in.

So having a penis might be 100 "weight" towards considering someone a man. Having XY chromosomes might be 50 "weight". Having a beard might be 5 or 10.

Identifying as a male registers as a 1, if anything.

This is all just numbers pulled from my arse, I've never sat down and quantified how much I consider each trait to be indicative. It's just my attempt to illustrate why someone who spends a lot of time money and effort on passing is an easier "sell" for me than someone like Yaniv, who does not, and why I do not consider the two equivalent.

But even then, anyone who manages to "cross categories" will still have an asterisk next to their designation, as you used as an example above, an "XX male" or "trans male" and I don't think that's inherently unfair. You can be male, subcategory trans, and that can be relevant information sometimes. Especially in medicine, or dating, or, as in the original example, other "intimate" or delicate/vulnerable situations.

I think it's important that trans people just make their peace with that, because a little compromise will go a long way to reconciliation, as opposed to attempting to "inflict" themselves on the unwilling put of a sense of moral indignation.


You personally think that the presence of a penis is more of an indicator than the xx or xy chromosome, I could find other people that disagree and say it is the other way around.

But again... "XX male". it's not Female Penis Syndrome.

Rather than imposing views why not let said people decide for themselves?

Because we don't let people self-identify as doctors, or as engineers. We take umbrage when someone who is noticeably not decides to call themselves clever or beautiful or talented. People's self identification means very little to us in quite a lot of ways.

So what someone identifies themselves as normally has little bearing on how others identify them, and this is right and proper. We are allowed to disagree.

I don't think this is an excuse to deny said person which sex/gender they are.

The argument they make is that if I don't want to date/sleep with them because they have a vagina, and that viscerally repulses me, that I don't "really" see them as a man.

Which, I mean, is right, but how do you reconcile that?


I mean I think both sides could be polite, no-one has to date or sleep with anyone they don't like.

I'm pretty sure that would get you excoriated by most trans activists. (Maybe not trans people, but activists.)

Dee Price #racist kiwifarms.net

[Dee expressing why she doesn't like black men]

You are a fool do you know what color of skin in trans dies the most. BLACK. 6 to 1.. for every white trans girl that dies 6 black trans girls will die. the black male is the most dangerous to trans girls and that is coming from the black trans girls.. Believe me She is a trip the main one that talked about it a lot she took a lot of her stuff down, but she has been around for a long time telling off black men about the way they treat trans girls. but it is not just black all colors kill trans girls. with the Asians being the least likely. Hispanics also do not seem to mind killing trans girls in some countries but in others are way less violent. But definitely there is a problem with the black girls suffering so horrifically..

There is really no excuse for all the deaths. But you seem to love to support a bigot pandering gay male over real trans anyways so why are you even worried about a trans woman fighting with a shemale

Anonymous #fundie fsm.typepad.com

bobby,

where do you live because me and my freinds are going to come and kick you ass you fucking idiot. and the next time you call my god a faggot i will jam another oar up your ass and you will have three oars up your ass and your boyfriends dick and i will super glue those oars before i put them in your ass. you are a dog fucker, and a spaghetti monster fucker and a devil fucker and a boyfrien fucker.

Issy Dickinson #transphobia #sexist sexisreal.com

It is well known that abusers, groom everyone around them, not just their victims. This country and it’s people are being groomed to accept pseudoscience that people can change sex if they want to and that men who fetishize women are the most oppressed. Stonewall UK has been groomed by Trans Rights Activists and so have LGBTQ organizations and Pride. They have been groomed by Trans Identified Males, who identify as “lesbians” and whose greatest desire is to have sex with real lesbians, dismissing lesbians’ boundaries, in order to validate themselves.

Lesbians, in turn have been groomed, especially the really young ones, to believe that trans women are really women and that their penises, are in fact “ladydicks”, or “clits on a stick”, as they have been marketing them. These men are sexual abusers. Trans Rights Activists have groomed the country, organizations, politicians and the media, into believing that one can change sex and that a child can be “born in the wrong body”.

They have introduced paedo-culture into mainstream LGBTQ culture with the likes of drag-kids, who have been highly sexualized by and for adult men- men who identify as women. Abusers are active at Pride events, actively encouraging children to be hateful towards older lesbians, who won’t be coerced or harassed into having sex with Trans Identified Males (TIMs). They have groomed these children and young people to push away their own safeguarding protections and despise them. Women are the natural protectors of children,

Pedophiles now calling themselves, Minor Attracted Persons (MAPs) ate emerging from the shadows, where they have been lurking for decades to attach themselves to LGBTQ events and organizations, to have unchallenged access to children. We are ALL being groomed to accept these things and then wonder why there has been a huge leap in the number of teenage girls seeking gender reassignment and binding their breasts to prevent unwanted male attention. They are seeking a way out of their female, sexual oppression and lesbianism

Homophobic parents are encouraging their gender non-conforming children into sexual transition, to hide their probable homosexuality or lesbianism. They are grooming their children to “trans the gay away”, rather than have the embarrassment of a butch lesbian daughter, or an effeminate gay-boy. Most female detransitioners are lesbians! And report that they were always lesbians, but couldn’t cope with their sexuality, or their families homophobia. This upsurge of grooming the public, but in particular women, lesbians and gender non-conforming children, emanates from Queer Theory that underpins Transgender ideologies, pedophile acceptance and the male abusers it attracts.

We have all been groomed and desensitized to this abuse of children, lesbians and women. Queer Theory is ultimately a Men’s Sexual Rights movement that promotes increasingly violent, obscure and illegal sex. It is men and men who identify as women, who gain the most.-the domination of women and children. However, Trans Identified Males would have you believe that they are the most oppressed demographic in this county. In the main they are white, middle-class males, who have been raised with huge privileges overall groups in society and whose sense of entitlement is very evident. Truth is, that they are “identifying” into women’s and lesbians’ oppression. It is a case of the oppressors, claiming and appropriating oppression.

Royce E. Van Blaricome #fundie christiannews.net

Ambulance Chaser:
You can't change your orientation OR your gender. If you're born a female, you'll be a female, you'll be a female for your entire life.

It's just that some females were born with male genitalia.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
Another lie from the AC. I suggest you talk to Rosaria Butterfield, Sam Allberry, Christopher Yuan, Matt Moore, Jackie Hill-Perry, Joe Dallas - just for starters!

Additionally, there is no difference between one's sex and one's gender. It's is only a fairly recent phenomenon that the LGBTQABCXYZ Community has drummed up as a way to try and rationalize and justify there perversion and sin.

And no, there are NO females born with male genitalia. Another figment of your imagination.,

Ambulance Chaser:
Any evidence to support any of those assertions?

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
Absolutely! Thanks for asking.

I'd love to provide links to all of those. Unfortunately, CNN doesn't allow that. So just Google them. Here are some titles for the videos. Enjoy your time watching them! Maybe you'll actually learn something..

[He posts a bunch of books, articles and YouTube videos.]

Oh yeah, almost forgot. One more piece of evidence for you. Wrt to the " there are NO females born with male genitalia. Another figment of your imagination", here's your evidence.... wait for it.... wait for it.... drum roll please.....

IT'S CALLED A MIRROR!!

Ambulance Chaser:
So, nothing, aside from personal testimonials, aka, no evidence whatsoever. Got it.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
Yup. Just like in a court of law. We've been down that road before too.,

Thanks for completely discrediting yourself once again and showing that you prefer to stay in your Denial and cling to your Delusion.

Oh, and only one little problem with your Denial though. That personal testimony that you so easily wish to dismiss is followed up by a CHANGED LIFE!!!!

In every single one of those cases.

Which is a WHOLE LOT MORE EVIDENCE than ANYTHING you've ever put out. Oh, and the mirror, THAT is FIRSTHAND EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY which is reliable in any court of law.

BAM!! KABOOM!! Better go back to school and get a real law degree.

Ambulance Chaser:
Actually, first-hand testimony is considered the lowest, least reliable form of testimony.

I'm not the one in denial and delusion. You're the one trying to present YouTube videos and article in Christian magazines as biological evidence. Come back to me when you have a peer-reviewed scientific journal article.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
Wrong again. Bet sharpen up those legal skills.

I've provided evidence and you've refused to even look at it!! THAT is denial.

Come back to me after you've watched them and bring something that refutes the evidence provided.

I'll wait...

Ambulance Chaser:
No, you haven't. You've provided personal testimony.

"They're lying to the world and/or to themselves." There, I refuted it. Now you're going to tell me I have no way to prove that, which is exactly the POINT. We have no way to prove or disprove what they're saying. The statements are unfalsifiable, and thus, worthless.

If you hooked one of these people up to an MRI and measured their hypothalamus before gay conversion therapy, and then after, and the size of the hypothalamus matched a control-group gay brain before, and then a control-group straight brain after, and if this procedure were documented in a respected neurological or medical journal, you might have something.

Stories are nothing.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
Thank you for showing all you got and that you think that's refuting evidence.

Much appreciated!! The statements are NOT unfalsifiable. Denial and rejection of a truth does not change the facts or the truth.

Like I said, it's good enough in a court of law. Sorry, you lose.

But thanks again! Your denial is NOTHING!

Ambulance Chaser:
You keep saying things as if your bald-faced, unsupported assertions were true.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
You keep saying things as if your bald-faced, unsupported assertions were true.

Tracy Murphree #fundie rawstory.com

In a Facebook post now hidden from view, the likely new sheriff of Denton County, Texas said he would beat a transgender woman so severely she’d end up in a hospital if she tried to share a bathroom with his daughter.

According to the Dallas Observer, Tracy Murphfree — who only faces token opposition from a Libertarian Party candidate and no Democratic candidate — jumped on the anti-transgender bandwagon with his Friday afternoon post.

“This whole bathroom thing is craziness I have never seen,” Murphree wrote last Friday. “All I can say is this: If my little girl is in a public women’s restroom and a man, regardless of how he may identify, goes into the bathroom, he will then identify as a John Doe until he wakes up in whatever hospital he may be taken to. Your identity does not trump my little girl’s safety. I identify as an overprotective father that loves his kids and would do anything to protect them”

In the comments that followed, Murphree clashed with Amber Dyden Briggle, a former candidate for Denton City Council who has a transgender son.

“As the parent of a transgender child who is only 8 years old, Tracy, this … really, really upsets me,” she wrote. “I know you are a protective parent, but SO AM I. If my son were to walk into a women’s room, looking the way he does, he would no doubt be corrected and sent to the men’s room. What we’ve done now is call attention to a young child, only 8 years old, who is now behind closed doors with a bunch of men — had he walked in there to use the bathroom to pee in the first place, no one would have batted an eye, because he looks like and IS a boy. ”

“Let me put it another way: halfway through first grade, this PERFECT child of mine, who is just as miraculous and amazing today as he was on the day of his birth, stopped feeling comfortable using the girls’ room,” she added, before going on to explain the difficulties her child has encountered since then.

Murphree responded to Briggle by insisting he’s not a “bigot” and that she is part of the problem.

“Amber, you have demonstrated part of the problem. You advocate your right to defend your child and state that your child has the right to pee in peace. Yet when I advocate my right to defend my child and her right to pee in peace I’m a bigot and dangerous. I’m not a bigot I have nothing against you or your child. I would defend both of you with my life,” he wrote.

“Yes, I will be the next sheriff, and I will serve all citizens. I will not sit back and not voice my beliefs and opinions. I will not give in to the political correctness police. I won’t be threatened by those who may call me a bigot or ignorant. I have no issue with transgenders. That’s between them and God,” he added. “The few transgenders rights do not trump the rights of the many. I will not stand by in political correctness afraid of being labeled and allow a male to enter a bathroom my daughter occupies. I just won’t do it.”

pobox1880 & stellarmoth #sexist reddit.com

(pobox1880)
Fed Up TIF

I think I hit peak trans when I saw someone say that TIMs should be allowed to feel uncomfortable around and avoid TIFs but the other way around is "transmisogyny". How are we any kind of threat to them? Why should they be allowed to avoid us but we can't do the same when we feel uncomfortable with them?

I have severe body dysphoria that I struggle with every day but I am sick and tired of people coddling TIMs who tower over me in size and strength and could probably snap my neck. I also disagree with the idea that there's no such a thing as female or male socialization. Obviously people who were raised a certain way will think that way. It's not rocket science. I know that I was raised to be a perfect daughter and fed every line in the book about how to act and behave long before I came to identify as trans. It's bullsh*t.

I'm just fed up. :/ Sorry if this comes across as stupid or something. I just needed a place to vent without being fed to the wolves.

(stellarmoth)
I used to babysit frequently and ever since I learned about female and male socialization I'd see it absolutely everywhere, even from the most "progressive" of families. The most obvious example being a girl whose parents held her behavior to a much higher standard than her brother's, who was free to be loud and roughhouse much of the time.

A lot of trans seem to believe that TIMs should be in female prisons, if only for their own safety (nevermind that of real women, who don't matter apparently). Ask them if they think TIFs belong in male prisons and that's when they suddenly realize that women are put in danger by the opposite sex, regardless of gender identity. That is not to say that I think TIMs are safe in male spaces, but rather that they can't identify out of the threat they pose to women any more than a TIF can identify out of sex based oppression.

It's a really obvious double standard.

I'm sorry things are tough for you right now and I hope you have a better day soon.

Beer00 #fundie godlikeproductions.com

I WILL NEVER SING O CANADA AGAIN

time to fucking leave this shit hole

yeah lets change the national anthem to know tow to some fucking gay ass fags

DIS FUCKING CUSTING

FUCKING NEVER EVER AGAIN WILL I LISTEN TO O CANADA EVER


TORONTO – Canada's House of Commons has voted to render the country's national anthem gender neutral.

The legislation to change "O Canada" still requires the approval of the Senate. The bill changes the second line of the anthem from "true patriot love, in all thy sons command" to "in all of us command."

[link to www.foxnews.com]

Judgybitch #sexist #psycho femoid.com

The walk of shame is a right of passage, not rape
Poor judgement — moi? Ce n’est pas possible!
Coyote ugly. It’s a phrase men use to describe the experience of waking up, hungover as shit, in bed next to a girl so ugly you’d rather chew your arm off than have her stir. Yep, another night of too many shooters and very poor judgement. Well played, tequila. I’m willing to bet that every single varsity athlete or high status (medicine, engineering, computer science) male on any given college campus has had the experience. Why? Because they get hunted. All the time. By women. You see these guys staggering bleary-eyed into the dorm rooms the next morning, bro-punching their friends and saying “Dude, how could you let me do that?”

The walk of shame. A right of passage. One that men seem to relish, enjoy and get over pretty damn quickly. Yeah, you fucked an ugly chick. Or a fat chick. Whatever. You drank too much, lost all your reason and tumbled into bed with someone you wouldn’t normally touch with a ten yard pole. Ho hum. Where we going tonight, bros?

Women, on the other hand, are completely fucked in the head in this exact same situation. They get dressed up in their best whore clothes, head out to a frat party, drink their faces off, end up in bed with some guy they wouldn’t normally touch with a ten yard pole, wake up the next morning feeling like a total slutbag and then it happens. Someone must be to blame for this. I can’t possibly have gotten shitfaced and exercised some really poor judgement. Moi? Ce n’est pas possible! I am an innocent blushing virgin with impeccable moral standards. Why, only whores get smashed and fuck random guys in a frat house, and I am not a whore so JESUS MOTHER OF GOD I WAS RAPED!

Bitch, please. You weren’t raped. You were trashed. Why is it that men are held responsible for their actions no matter what their state of inebriation, but women get a pass. It doesn’t matter if you were drunk, stripped naked, straddled the guy in your best cowgirl and fucked like a banshee. You were drunk. You can’t consent. You were raped.

Dude might have been just as pissed up as you, but he can’t cry rape because rationality. Only men are rational creatures? Really? Bull. Shit.

There are women so delusional they actually think we live in a “rape culture”. What the fuck?

No, we don’t live in a rape culture. We live in a Don’t You Bitches Have Any Friends culture. Me and the Princess have our fair share of experience dancing like madwomen in our lingerie in night clubs filled with horny men starting looking like the cast of Ocean’s Twelve after that last appletini. Many nights ended with crazy slobbery make-out sessions with the DUDE WHO LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE BRAD PITT.

Here’s the thing. We protected each other. Not from Brad Pitt. From our own BAD JUDGEMENT. Rape culture holds men, and only men, responsible for what women do. And thanks, but I prefer to be responsible for my own fucking behaviour. And when I’m about to do something really stupid, that I will regret the next morning, I rely on my friends to save me FROM MYSELF.

So go ahead. Wear those fishnets and hoochie shorts. You look fucking hot! Play beer pong! Strip for that guy. Go ahead and fuck him. Make all those decisions BUT UNDERSTAND THEY ARE YOUR DECISIONS. You don’t get to wake up the next day feeling like a whore and ruin a man’s life because YOU ARE A SLUT. Women–and men–who really were violently brutalized by strangers totally against their will aren’t helped by your idea of a rape culture. In fact the rape culture YOU created makes it worse for them by equating a truly violent and awful crime with bad decisions made while drunk.

So embrace your slut. Or trust your friends when they tell you it’s time to say nighty-night to Brad. Or you know, shut the fuck up. . Take your pick.

Lots of love,

JB

2or3thingsIknow reddit.com

[on trans women being raped by male cellmates]

You can't really put them in men's prison either though, that's just asking for rape as a punishment for crimes. It's a tough one. I'd say put them in protection, but they're already mentally fragile and 23+ hours a day of solitary confinement won't help either.

Genuinely wondering, in your opinion, what is the answer?

She gave you her answer. Here is my answer. Put them in with men, because they are fucking men and why the fuck is it a woman's problem that they may suffer? FUCK THAT.

Andrew Anglin #racist dailystormer.name

[From "UK: More Details on Race-Mixing Indian Slut Who Got Raped, Chopped-Up and Stuffed in a Freezer"]

Reporting on this story, I’ve focused on the fact that it is gross to have this sort of gruesome behavior in our societies. However, along angle here is that the men who did it were defending their race, and as extreme and gross as the act was, you have to have a little bit of respect for them.

These guys kidnapped women of their own race and raped them, and after one escaped with her throat half-slit, they chopped the other up and stuffed her in a freezer.

Because the women were race-mixing.

Not even with non-Moslems – they were Indian and mixing with Arabs. Which were presumably even the same denomination of Islam as them.

This is some hardcore defense of the race these men showed.

RT

Online tributes are pouring in for Celine Dookhran, the 19-year-old whose body was found mutilated and stuffed inside a freezer at a £1.5 million London property.

[...]

It has been suggested by prosecutors that Dookhran, an Indian Muslim, was murdered because she was planning to marry a man of Arab Muslim descent. The family allegedly did not approve of the relationship.

[...]

Firstly, it is honorable. It is gross and extreme, but still, it is the definition of honor. These men knew they were going to get caught. And they did it anyway. For the honor of their race.

Secondly: it had absolutely nothing to do with religion. As has been made clear, the men they were mixing with were Moslems. It was a racial issue.

So I’m just going to throw this out there: imagine if white men cared this much about their own women race-mixing.

Just… just take a minute and imagine if we cared this much about that particular problem.

I’m certainly not implying White men should be kidnapping White female race-mixers, raping them and chopping them up and shoving them in freezers for fucking niggers. Although honestly, I wouldn’t feel bad if that happened, it is more than our women would require to get back in line.

White men are too much of cowards to simply call these sluts out in public.

If we had a movement to shame these whores, that would go a long, long way. If you see these people in Walmart, for instance, look the white woman directly in the eyes and say “how does that nigger dick taste, whore?”

You can’t get in trouble for that. Her buck is not going to attack you in a Walmart, and if he does he’ll be arrested and it will get in the media. Which is good. They won’t print your name, because you are the victim, but they will say that you made a “racially insensitive comment about the woman’s mixed race relationship.”

You can also yell from your car. If you see women with someone of another race, slow down, roll down your window and yell: “nigger-fucking whore! What does your father think????”

[...]

This is a massive problem. People say the numbers are low, but they are being disingenuous. They are using irrelevant statistics, such as OK Cupid data or marriage rates. Look with your eyes, and see how often you see women fucking nonwhites. It’s a lot. And it’s rising. And the reason they are doing this is because there is no shame associated with it. If you look a woman in the eye and call her a nigger-fucking whore, she will remember that for the rest of her life.

Do it.

Shove Me in the Freezer, by Al Green

If you think this Al Green parody is in bad taste, then you are a fucking pussy

I don’t know why I love him like I do
All the beatings he put me through
Took my virginity, my racial pride
I haven’t seen the worst of it yet
I want to know that my relatives will do to me
I love to stay
Take me to the building, stuff me in the freezer
Rape me in the shower, shove me in the freezer
Beating me down, chopping me up

Lookismisreal #sexist reddit.com

We live in a time where femoids are aspiring to be sluts thanks to all those hairy feminist legbeards who spouts crap like, how it's "progressive" and "empowering" for femoids to sleep with many people as possible. They are going so far as to organize walks like "the slut walk" to indoctrinate femoids and brainwash them to thinking how its okay to be a fucking slut. The idiotic bitches fall for this blatant propaganda and start fucking half of the men in the town to show how strong and independent they are. Its fucking revolting.

These cum dumpsters don't even care about STD's as long as they get railed by multiple guys every week. That's how fucked up these skanks are. Spreading all the diseases everywhere and making society more rotten than it is, is their goal. Also, the fucking nerve they have to actually defend their degenerate actions by saying shit like, "I'm a strong and free women!!! Don't judge!!!"; fuck off. We will judge your skank ass however we want. Anyone cunt who has fucked more than 2 men doesn't deserve any kind of respect. Hell, no femoid in this world deserves any respect, if you ask me.

What pisses me off more than anything is how after fucking countless of men they think that they deserve a good man to settle down with. The entitlement is off the fucking charts with these vapid cum dumpsters -- they don't deserve shit. Any man who actually dates a former slut is a desperate cuck who deserves what's he's getting into -- which is a relationships that will end in a few months due to the whore cheating on him.

Femoids need to be kept in checked. If they aren't, they act like total untamed beats due to the fact that they are not able to control their primal instincts and urges. Therefore, when you see a slut fucking shame her for what she is -- and if the white knights have a problem with it, tell them to go suck on a sack of cawks.

winters_frost #transphobia reddit.com

The transcult likes to say the examples picked out are "fringe and radical" but that's the entire point of this thread: is it really considered "radical" if so many people in the various trans subs upvote, agree, and support these kinds of posts?

Like the majority of transcult have no problem with calling Jessica Yaniv as fringe and radical because of how much attention he's got, and yet they'll have no problem with upvoting, praising and supporting the legions of TIMs that are basically just as bad as him. The TIMs who brag about making women uncomfortable in restrooms, stealing their mom's/sister's underwear and jerking off in them, fantasizing about sharing tampons and pads with women, etc.

Does r/itsafetish purport their examples represent the entire transgender community?

You know what's ironic about the popular emotional gaslight rhetoric of "we just want to live our lives in peace and pee" that the transcult loves to use?

The actual trans people who are just "living their lives" aren't complaining on the internet and blaming all their problems on transphobia. Because they're, yknow, actually trying to live their lives in peace instead of constantly trying to play SJW on the internet. They're the type that don't try and force and coerce society into accepting them into women's spaces or recognizing them as women. They're the type that try to fit into society rather than being entitled little shits who think society is what needs to bend to them because of some imaginary "oppression". It's why you don't really hear them speak out that often either, usually because they hate the transcult/TRAs/SJWs almost just as much as they hate us TERFs.

But you'll occasionally see them posting in places such as here, because ironically these trans people know that if they post in the various trans subs calling out the predatory and creepy behaviours of those TIMs, they'll get backlash from the transcult/SJWs too for being "invalidating", or even "transphobic" themselves.

But the worst part of all this is that all the creepy, predatory, entitled Jessica Yaniv-type transfolk and their virtue signalling SJW allies you see that comprise the majority of the various trans subs like mtf, gencyn, asktg, traa, egg_irl, etc. constantly use these "peaceful trans people living their lives" as props to try and either disguise or excuse their own creepy predatory behaviour. "I'm just trying to peacefully live my life, which is why lesbians should stop being transphobic and have sex with my girldick!"

To answer your question, it honestly doesn't even matter whether the "peaceful transfolk living their lives" or the creepy predatory TIMs are more representative of the trans community. Because no matter how much of a majority of minority either group are, and no matter how much we here at itsafetish point out the creepy predatory behaviours of these TIMs, the creepy predatory TIMs and their apologist SJW allies will always just default to using those "peaceful transfolk living their lives" as props and claim that they are no different from them. And then ironically, they'll accuse those peaceful transfolk of being transphobic themselves if they dare speak out again these creepy TIMs that think they're women just cause they feel turned on and "gender euphoria" from feeling like a girl.

SheilaG #fundie bevjoradicallesbian.wordpress.com

(response to a het woman who chose to get married and have children and questions radfem lesbian separatism)

Sonia, what the hell are you doing on this blog? I want at least one country in the world that is completely woman owned and operated. You can stick with your male crowd, go ahead, hang with the males. Bev Jo and all lesbian separatists have better things to do with our time. Again, we want 100% male free space. Sonia, go kiss ass with men, you belong with them have sold out to them, and we don’t give a damn about you. Get the heck out of our space, you penis colaborator. Again, why are you here? This is our space of lesbian freedom, it has nothing to do with sell outs like you! Go to men, continue to support the rapists and oppressors of women; we have no respect for you. Again, why do you come to lesbian sacred space?

Return of the Harem of Strawwomen!

DermoscopyStudier #sexist reddit.com

I agree with everything said here

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I posted this on incels a while back. Let me know if I missed anything, because after all, I wouldn't want to unfairly generalize women.

All women fall into one of the following categories:

Ditzy nursing student/nurse: She might not be a nursing student (though the odds are good that she is), but rest assured, she is at least reasonably hot, and she is dumb. She might also be a dental hygienist. She writes and types like a child, she can’t hold an even remotely intelligent conversation with a male, yet she succeeds in life because it is impossible for females to fail classes. The teachers will not allow it. And she will be affirmative actioned into a job after she graduates. Her boyfriend/husband is a 7+. Catch her in the supermarket wearing her work clothes. This is the future for a lot of “Staceys,” as you call them. Cheerleader-type.

Somewhat-attractive liberal artsy feminist: Has dyed hair but is fairly cute. She’s “polyamorous.” She’s just exploring her sexualityyyyy. What this means is that she collects Chad dicks like they’re going extinct. If she has a boyfriend, she’s openly cucking him…and he pretends to be fine with it because that’s the “enlightened” thing to do these days. Hello, it’s The Current Year, women LOVE SECKS as much as menz!!!111 The heterosexual ones are all subs in BDSM. Some of them are confused lesbians who claim to be bisexual and will peg their effeminate boyfriend. He’s gotta be pretty, though. This ain’t a prison. She will eventually realize she’s gay and thank her effeminate boyfriend for helping her figure this out.

Ugly dyed-hair feminist: Probably wears thick-framed glasses. A walking modern cliche…don’t really need to go into the description too much. Privilege, patriarchy, problematic, rape, rape culture, abortion (cough “women’s issuez”), mansplaining, etc. Into BDSM, but paradoxically, if she is heterosexual, this manhater is a sub. In the bedroom, she wants you to treat her like a slut and choke her. If she’s a lesbian calling herself “bisexual,” she enjoys pegging submissive men who are effeminate because she is really into women.

Lesbian: She has either lost interest in pretending to be bisexual for the “look at me” factor, or she’s the masculine type who was boyish from a young age.

Quiet artsy prude: This type of chick doesn’t want to have sex at all. She’s a hipster and so is her boyfriend, who is a pussy iphone-toting, Starbucks-drinking numale feminist who won’t pressure her to do much in the bedroom. When she does have sex, she lies there like a dead fish. She’s obsessed with pretty thingz (“art”) and loves her Pinterest account. This includes pretty, dainty little foods/recipes. The blueberry muffins sawed in half on a cutting board with shards of wheat in the ambiance are fine, but what she really wants is pictures of some kind of Asian cuisine. You know, shit that really shouldn’t be anything more than an appetizer. Remember, everything has to be pretty, little, dainty, light, chic, and hip. She thinks she’s quirky and creative, but it’s all a put-on. She cares about making the image in her mind real more than whether or not she actually enjoys it. And any male who enters her world will have to fit that mold…especially since sex hurts her narrow vagina.

Fat black woman: If you’ve met one, you’ve met them all. They’re loud, they’re obnoxious, they’re sassy. They drive like their attitude. If you’re at a 4-way stop sign and you get there first, they ain’t waitin’ for no other cars…get outta her way! She bitches constantly about how black men be datin’ them white women and they caynt handle a STRONG. BLACK. WOMAN. “Dat’s why dey be shirkin’ they responsibilities to they baby mommas and da 5 keee-yids dey had out of wedlock.” “Your honor, he ain’t payin’ his challlld suppote.” If your cock is below 7 inches, they think it’s TINY. They thought Chris Brown’s dick (of which pictures leaked), which is probably longer flaccid than mine is erect, was “tiny.” And they will fight yo ass. Black men generally aren’t white knights the way both the numales and the religious, southern, “you hit a woman you get a whoopin” white men are, so they will give these feral hyenas what they deserve if it comes to it. It only takes about 84 punches and slaps before a black man has finally had enough and drops her with one punch.

Non-fat black woman: See “Fat black woman,” but add an extra layer of pretentiousness. The race whining will make you want to strangle her.

Fat white woman (non-feminist): This is separate from the morbidly obese woman. If you think her being fat will make her standards lower, think again. She’s vicious and thinks men are beneath her. That Tedx talk Youtube video of the fat woman bitching about men who meet her standards not wanting to date her…that’s what they’re all like. Eventually, a Chad comes along and dates her…oftentimes a black Chad (a Tyrone?), since blacks love their big booties, even if it’s really a fatass with a fat ass. The guy had better work out, because he needs to be able to make her feel like a dainty woman in the bedroom, after all…and that’s quite difficult because she’s a “curvy” woman. You know, the curves extending outward from her stomach? Anyway, if you’re not Chad, you’re always at risk of being yelled at and belittled by this creature. If you are Chad, you’re at risk if you don’t want to date her, because that means you’re shallow and can’t handle a woman with a HEALTHY BODY TYPE. She’s opinionated, condescending, and thinks she’s smart, but she’s actually a complete idiot, and there’s nothing worse than opinionated idiots. Lately, there has been a trend for slender 7 males to date these fat white women, and you can bet these are abusive relationships, with her bossing him around and him taking it either because he is getting off on it because he has a fetish for being submissive to a fat white woman and kissing her feet, or just because he’s that desperate and has no self respect. Either way, she has absolutely no respect for him, and will dump him/cuck him at first opportunity.

Morbidly obese white woman: Usually some form of white trash. This is an incel’s “league,” I’m afraid. May be missing some teeth. Hygiene probably lacking. She’ll do it because to her, it’s just “fun.” She doesn’t give a fuck so she’s willing to give fucks. Aside from that, a headcase…but what did you expect? You don’t get to be like 300 pounds as a woman without being mentally fucked up. Incel competition is redneck white males.

Non-obese redneck/white trash white woman: It’ll be a cold day in hell before you can ever trust her to be faithful. Southern accent, lousy teeth, and cigarette smoking. Probably addicted to pills and/or booze. If not, she’s certainly close to people who are. At least her standards aren’t as high. She might even cheat on Wayne with a white incel. I guess incels just need to look for white trash females if they want to have any shot whatsoever.

Cute, nerdy little Asian girl: Awwwww. Girls are gamers too, dooooood. Don’t be fooled by her apparent disposition…she will friendzone the fuck out of you if you’re not Chad or at least an Asian Chad. Her Miss Innocent act doesn’t change the facts; you’re her beta orbiter “male friend” and she’s not interested.

Middle Eastern Muslim girl: Her parents will literally kill her for being with a man who is not Muslim. If you’re a terrorist, you’re not incel.

GymChad CC-rider: She can’t even settle down enough to let teachers and employers get her into nursing and hygienist professions. She probably works in real estate, or that will be the height of her career after she’s done as a receptionist. It doesn’t take long before she’s knocked up…and her kid becomes “her world.” Not to worry, Gainz Chad is to the rescue. Sure, she got fucked off Tinder and got some free meals from OKCupid, but in the long run, it’s getting married and divorced a few times to some Gainz Chads who cheat on her (“why are all guyz such jerx?! And my cheating doesn’t count!”) that is going to help her be a perpetual single mom.

Dumb Christian Girl Who Takes Religion Seriously: These are actually a catch, all things considered, but they’re only available for Cowboy Chads. She will invariably end up with this “southern gentleman,” and his hobbies include huntin’ and fishin’. What else to do when they’re not goin’ to church? The Lawd says thou shalt kill animals. He bought himself a truck. The most important men in her life, in order: Jesus, her sons, Cowboy Chad. She’s dumber than planting flowers near a mailbox, but she has no problem with “traditional gender roles.” She will cook for you. She will regurgitate Cowboy Chad’s conservative politics, etc. However, she expects a man to be a “man,” so incels are out, as are numale hipsters. She wants a man of the house. Take the good with the bad.

Psychopath: They really aren’t like other girls. If you don’t mind anything from regular criminal activity to being murdered, if you can find these rare exceptions, you might catch a break. She’s so crazy and delusional she might fuck an incel. Better be a light sleeper; you might want to wake up before she puts the knife to your penis or drowns the kids in the bathtub. Often overlaps with the white trash/rednecks.

Wolfblade111 #homophobia deviantart.com

Now before anyone gets offended, lemme at least say my side.
If people are allowed to have headcannons of different characters (Straight, Bi, Gay, Lesbian, ect.) involving their sexualities and what not, than so am I. I mean, it's a free country right? (Depending on where you live that is. XD)

Now look, I don't do this normally with gay characters, when it comes to them, I usually just leave em be and never pay them any mind.

But in the case of Soldier-76's sudden reveal that as I've said in a status post and a previous upload. It feels more like it's Pandering for Money, rather than to just throw in a new character who is gay.

Yes, the creator has stated that Soldier-76 is gay, but since when has that stopped people from having their own headcannons?

Oof and it seems you are fucking homophobic with you're supporting male x female, fetishizing female x female but not ok with male x male. Typical.

Oof and how typical, calling out someone for liking two outta three things and then cutting and running (Aka Blocking before I could reply.)

Ya wanna know Why I don't ship anything MalexMale? It's because I am not...comfortable with it.

If a male character is gay in something, fine, so be it. I certainly don't have to give two shits about that character, I certainly don't have to make fan art of them. I sure as hell don't have to wave a flag around and scream for joy at the prospect of another gay character.

You wanna know WHY I'm Uncomfortable with malexmale? Because of the Fetishizing, ya know, like how people like me make girl x girl a fetish, yeah...GuyxGuy Fans do that on a MUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH higher level.

If a guy is gay in real life, fine, whatever, I don't give two shits if you like guys/girls. If your a cool person. Your cool in my book, doesn't mean I'm gonna enjoy what you may or may not draw, but I'm fine with ya, your not gonna hear me saying anything negative.

But when it comes to Fictional characters, THAT! is where I have a problem.

I have seen so, so so so so so so so SOOOOOOO many guyxguy shippers who fetishize these pairings and characters and write these quite clearly, wet dream based fanfictions about these characters.

What's even more disturbing is that a lot of these ships involve characters...WHO AREN'T EVEN GAY!!! They take, Brother/Brother type friendships and twist and turn them into these sick, twisted, disturbing love stories that make Twilight look like the best romance novel of all time.

What's also disturbing is the fact that many of these fans/writers/artists, will tend to do things along the lines of.

A) Killing off a straight character's love interest in the most horrible way possible or some other poor attempt at getting their ship to sail or to scream at how much they hate that character with a passion.

B) Write where one of the male characters is Raped by the person they have a Brother/Brother relationship with and end up LIKING IT and falling in love with said character, which shows how disturbed the writer's mind is if that's how they think love works.

&

C) The Fans are...Quite Clearly, Nuts. I've seen enough of their works to (Not on purpose mind you, they just happen to post a lot of these works to groups I'm apart of.) scar me for life. They will tear someone apart if that person doesn't ship what they ship and they will send death threats, saying how that person should kill themselves for not liking a guyxguy ship.

That is why I am uncomfortable with guyxguy ships, because everytime I see them, it's like seeing something that triggers you, it's like...seeing something from your past you'd rather just forget.

That's what it is for Me, now, clearly, not all shippers are like that. But a lot of them are and it's disturbing how they are...allowed to get away with it because it'd be considered Homophobic for banning them or kicking them.

So you wanna know why I despise GuyxGuy ships, why I hate Yaoi shippers.

You can thank all the assholes who committed the acts I mentioned above for garnering my hatred.

do I fetishize FemalexFemale pairings? Yes.


Matt Forney #sexist mattforney.com

It’s time to stop beating around the bush: feminists want to be raped.

It’s the only logical explanation for how they behave. It’s the only way to understand why they can cheer on hordes of Muslim “refugees” swarming into Europe to rape and pillage. It’s the only way to comprehend why they can whip themselves up into a frenzy over masculine men meeting up for a beer and smearing them as leading “pro-rape rallies.”

Everything feminists do, from holding up “Refugees Welcome” signs at airports to passing affirmative consent laws, is geared around encouraging men to assault them.

This isn’t a conscious urge. No feminist wakes up in the morning and thinks to herself, “I’m gonna try and get raped today!” There’s no Protocols of the Elders of Seneca Falls laying out a secret plot to turn females into walking fuckdolls for rapist men.

But deep in the recesses of her lizard hindbrain, the average feminist wants nothing more than for a man to shove her into a wall and force himself deep inside her.

Here are the reasons why feminists want to be sexually assaulted, and why they’re working around the clock to aid rapists.

1. Feminism is an r-selected ideology, and rape is an r-selected sexual strategy.

As Anonymous Conservative has shown repeatedly, leftism and conservatism are merely expressions of two competing reproductive strategies: r-selection and K-selection. To review quickly, K-selection breeds children to compete in a world of limited resources through a two-parent upbringing, defined by high sexual dimorphism, monogamy, late sexual maturation, and loyalty to the in-group (i.e. wolves). R-selection breeds children for a world of abundant resources through a single-mother upbringing, defined by low sexual dimorphism, promiscuity, early sexual maturation, and disloyalty to the tribe (i.e. rabbits).

The conflict between leftism (of which feminism is a subset) and conservatism is the conflict between r and K. K-selected individuals want a world that encourages competition and meritocracy, while r-selected individuals want a world of free resources: free food, free money, free shelter and free sex. In a K-selected world, men and girls have to compete to earn the right to mate with one another; in an r-selected world, men and girls have sex with no thought as to the consequences.

What does this have to do with feminism and rape? Simple: rape is the ultimate r-selected sexual strategy.

By its very definition, rape is an act of entitlement: forcing yourself on someone who doesn’t want to have sex with you, whom you haven’t earned the right to sleep with. Much in the same way leftists feel entitled to take other peoples’ money away through taxation and welfare, rapists feel entitled to stick their penises in girls’ vaginas. In fact, you could say that rape is an inherently leftist form of sex, which would explain why so many male feminists, such as Jian Ghomeshi and Hugo Schwyzer, enjoy assaulting and abusing girls.

Sexual assault is sexual socialism: redistributing nookie to the least privileged in society.

Feminists, being leftists, are r-strategists themselves. The purpose of feminism is to eliminate restrictions on female sexuality: allow girls to sleep around without getting pregnant, let them legally kill their unborn babies when they do get knocked up, and have it all funded by the taxpayer.

From an r-strategist’s perspective, rape is a good thing, because it allows a female to have children without having to do anything, aside from breathe.

It’s well-known that a great many girls have rape fantasies, and a significant number of rape victims claim to have orgasmed during their assaults. Both these points serve as evidence that a portion of the female population—the r-selected, leftist portion—not only wants to be raped, but is physiologically adapted for it.
Once you accept the premise that feminists subconsciously desire to have their vaginal walls torn up by psychopathic men, their behavior suddenly makes sense. For example, feminists are unwilling to condemn the Muslim “refugees” who have been assaulting girls in Germany and other European countries (and indeed, have accused those who talk about the story of “racism” and/or “Islamophobia”) because they want those refugees to keep raping.

The Muslim “refugees” streaming into Europe from the Middle East are the consummate r-selected cowards. Instead of fighting for their families back home, they’re fleeing to safe countries where they can live off government benefits. Instead of being grateful that Europeans are willing to take them in, they throw temper tantrums because their Internet isn’t fast enough, their food isn’t tasty enough, or they don’t have enough to do, showing that they are parasites looking for someone to leech off of.

Muslims rape European girls for the same reason that they riot over slow WiFi: they believe they deserve to get something for nothing.

Some right-wing personalities have tried to explain the left’s embrace of Muslim “rapefugees” with such nebulous concepts as “pathological altruism,” but the reality is much bleaker. In the darkest recesses of their minds, feminists want swarthy refugees to punch them in the face, tear their clothes off, and spit roast them like plump, juicy swine. Don’t expect them to suddenly realize the truth, either, because…

2. Feminists encourage girls to get raped, then deny all responsibility for their actions.

In the past few years, even the slightest suggestion that girls have a responsibility for their own safety is met with a chorus of “MISOGYNIST!” “DON’T BLAME THE VICTIM!” The oft-repeated feminist chant, “Don’t teach women not to get raped, teach men to not rape,” is an explicit call for girls to place themselves into situations where they’re likely to get sexually assaulted, then dodge all blame.

While some feminists are no doubt doing this out of naivete, the subconscious motivator for many of them is their r-selected psychology.

Personal responsibility is a K-strategist concept; in the rabbit warren, things just happen. By discouraging girls from protecting themselves, feminists are implicitly encouraging them to get violated, then pinning the blame on an undefinable “rape culture.” Which brings me to my next point…

3. Feminists talk about the West having a “rape culture” because they want a rape culture.

As mentioned above, the worldwide leftist outrage against Roosh and the Return of Kings tribal meetups far outstripped their reaction to the Muslim gang rape attacks in Germany and Sweden during New Years’ Eve. This isn’t just because of hysteria and slander: r-selected leftists are more threatened by masculine men than by cowardly Muslim rapists.

One of the most laughable claims feminists make about game/red pill/PUA culture is that it encourages men to feel “entitled” to sex and female companionship. Even skimming a manosphere blog will show that this is the opposite of the truth. “Game” and “red pill” philosophy teaches men that they have to earn girls by improving themselves: lifting, dressing better, having interesting hobbies, and being entertaining conversationalists.

If a morbidly obese basement dweller came onto the Roosh V Forum and started whining about how he couldn’t get laid, he’d be laughed at and told to hit the gym and get a life.

The reason why there’s always been an overlap between the seemingly hedonistic manosphere and the more traditionalist alternative right is because both groups have the same view of sexual relationships: men and women need to earn the right to sleep with and marry each other. The end destinations may be different, but the road is the same.

Feminists oppose this because leftists oppose competition in general. Feminist obscurantism in regards to sexual relationships (e.g. their claims that the “friendzone” doesn’t exist or claiming that men just need to “treat women like human beings” if they want to get laid) is about stripping men of their ability to compete for a mate. Similarly, pushing “fat acceptance,” tattoos and piercings, and encouraging girls to be “bossy” and sarcastic is about crippling females’ ability to compete for men.

To make matters worse, feminists have been trying to train men to rape girls for years. Their constant claim that the West has a “rape culture” is just wishful thinking: in actuality, rape has been on the decline for decades. Because of this, feminists have tried to legislate masculinity away through “affirmative consent” and “yes means yes” laws, which force men to explicitly beg for permission at every step of a sexual encounter, branding them “rapists” if they don’t comply.
Affirmative consent laws and “rape culture” claims are a two-pronged attack on masculinity, designed to advantage sneaky males and hurt masculine men, and there’s no sneakier male than a rapist.

Unfortunately, despite all the rape hoaxes the mainstream media conjures up, the “rape culture” that feminists screech about has yet to materialize.

The UVA rape story, for example, turned out to be a lurid, masturbatory fantasy passed off as “news.”

Because feminists couldn’t create a rape culture, they imported one from the Middle East.

From here, all the pieces fall into place. We see clearly why the European Union is debating banning one man from their borders and libeling him as a “rape advocate,” while letting millions of actual Muslim rapists flood their countries.

We see why leftists are driven to protest masculine men but not sneaky “refugee” cowards who abandon their families in search of government freebies and “easy” white women.

The goal of feminism is to turn women into rape-meat.

Every feminist, deep down, wants nothing more than a rapist’s baby in her belly. The armada of horny, restless, greedy Muslims storming into Europe is a bounty for the r-selected feminist. Leftists will wave “Refugees Welcome” signs no matter how many girls are forcibly DP’ed by angry Arab invaders, because Europe’s skyrocketing rape rates are a feature, not a bug.

The only thing that will stop the rape-lust of feminists and their poorly-endowed Muslim abusers is Western men having the courage to call it out.

There can be no compromise, no peace with these traitors inside the walls. While more moderate women can be saved, no one will ever be able to convince the termagents of the left that they should be more afraid of Muslim rapists than white “racists.”

They are our enemies, just as much as the dusky hordes planting their flags on our soil

Terry A Davis #conspiracy youtube.com

[Video Highlights]


1:24-1:30
God said 640x480. 16 colors is a covenant, like circumcision.

9:20-9:44
Okay, listen little faggot, have you ever written a Compiler? Have you ever written an interrupter? You little faggot? Have you ever written an interrupter? You little faggot? No, you haven't cause you're a faggot. Why don't you go write an interrupter, faggot? Pascal - you're fucking, in the ocean, with some nigger in the deep ocean, you've got no idea what's underneath you, little faggot.

9:50-10:05
Do it like a white man. A white man uses an iso file, this is the way a white operating system is installed.

11:14-11:43
When I am king by divine right, I will hunt down every CIA nigger and execute him personally. I killed a CIA nigger by running him over on 9/9/99. I was being followed by agents and freaked out. It's okay to run over space aliens. If you see a CIA nigger, run them over. They glow in the dark. Plan B? I'm not sucking nigger cock, bitch. Fuck yourself. I have a space alien. Plan B, fuck you.

11:55-12:06
Homo is a choice. I was normal until the CIA started torturing me with pedophile bait. CIA is atheist retard niggers. Everything backfires.

12:12-12:44
The CIA has a 7-year old deepthroating a loaded 45 at DMV next to me fucking with me. I'll teach him to pull the trigger. FBI put a kid next to me in DMV to evoke sex response. I said I would put a gun in his mouth. When FBI child sex agents got in my space, I wanted to stick a gun and kill one, shove a pencil in the eye of another and toss into traffic.

14:44-14:53
Bill Gates and the Illuminati got a herd of nigger cattle. Wooo! We got a herd of nigger cattle!

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(KingOfRome)
[Serious] The world would be a better place if all femoids were shipped off to the sun.

Anyone agree?

(Poll)
Agree?
Yes | Votes: 12 | 66.7%
No | Votes: 6 | 33.3%

(SkinnyBaldcel)
Considering that would mean the end of humanity.. Then yes but I still want to have a foid with me so personally it wouldn't be better for myself

(Albocel)
Absolutly. Female humans are fucking vermin. All of them

(Evil Genius)
Yes.

(Mainländer)
Killing all women :no:
Sexually enslaving all women :yes:

(GameDevCel)
all the man in the planet would start hunting efeminite males to fuck, i would be like fucking jail but everywhere, considering most dudes here are bellow 6 feet and noit jacked, noo, i don't to have my ass raped by some hobo
@Mainländer

Killing all women :no:
Sexually enslaving all women :yes:

don't neet to be sexual slavering, just brainwashing them to be submissive would be a massive help

(anon)
@SkinnyBaldcel
Considering that would mean the end of humanity..

>he thinks men wouldn't figure out a way to make do without foidfilth
:soy:

(Michael5651)
Yes, end humanity.

(SkinnyBaldcel)
@anon

>he thinks men wouldn't figure out a way to make do without foidfilth
:soy:

Yea artificial insemination but if you want society to continue to exist then you are:soy:

(anon)
@SkinnyBaldcel

Yea artificial insemination but if you want society to continue to exist then you are:soy:

You are a reddit fag soyboy for thinking men need women to survive. Kill yourself, newshit.

(chesscel)
yes, but it would be better to have farms or breeding concentration camps for them so humanity doesnt die

(SecondComing)
Mankind was a mistake.

(anon)
@chesscel

yes, but it would be better to have farms or breeding concentration camps for them so humanity doesnt die

Keep 1-5% of foids alive as sex slaves.

(SkinnyBaldcel)
@anon
You are a reddit fag soyboy for thinking men need women to survive. Kill yourself, newshit.

You don't get my point, my point was that society needs to be whiped off so when all women are gone men should NOT be allowed to do anything to maintain society cause life is pointless and humans are shit you low IQ brainlet

(Red Pill Rage)
@Albocel

Absolutly. Female humans are fucking vermin. All of them

They're incel hate machines.

(Insomniac)
Yes bro.

(Life Wasted)
The world would be a better place if the sun died and took earth with it.

secondtidalwave2 #sexist reddit.com

Recently, my computer had a temporary breakdown and I was off this sub. and god, I felt a lot more relaxed. You'd think you'd get used to it, but I can't even bring myself to read the articles now, only your comments. I simply cannot bear to read any more trans shit from them. Those completely male voices...that way they are so unaware of how male they come across. Always got that same male tone: that short, to the point, efficient, unemotional tone. Always instantly ordering women to obey, threatening to hurt themselves..oh, wait, no I meant, hurt you...

I read the headlines, and that's as much as I can bear. I found I was reading articles and beginning to shout at the walls, carrying on imaginary conversations..or rather rants! I feel such rage, when I see things like TW saying lesbians should be 'open' to accepting a penis..if you arent naturally open to it, then this means you've got to force yourself into sex you dont want, because of all these thirsty, predatory TW. How can cisdykes and transdykes get closer?" asks a sincere (fucking stupid handmaiden lesbian) idiot.

"Lots of sex and not fucking up but mainly lots of sex" is the answer. Not fucking up? What does that mean? It means, put the TW first and police yourself very carefully and just like any battered wife, make yourself a doormat, tremble and be available. They are abusers. Its giving me heartburn. Tension in the shoulders. God knows how much stored up inside. I find I obsess about it...its just so horrifying, and its everywhere, and still most people think TW are sweet and humble and have operations. Are like Kim in "Different For Girls"..if you've seen that, of course you are on Kim's side, and you'd accept her as almost female, near enough makes no odds.

Yet now there's a film like Tangeroine where a TW batters a woman. A man, beats a woman and its art.I cannot stand it anymore. I dont live in the UK and there's nothing I can do. Are any of you suffering actual physical symptoms?

mlp-fictionkin #sexist mlp-fictionkin.tumblr.com

The #metoo tag

Should include reverse rape. It’s a serious problem that’s just as bad and just as, if not more, common than what people usually refer to as rape, and it is a form of rape.

Let me educate you all here a second, because unfortunately, reverse rape is often overlooked and ignored.

Reverse rape is when someone refuses to date someone else because of their appearance, weight, race, because they’re trans, or for whatever other biased reason they might have. It’s denying love and affection to someone who they would otherwise choose to date in an instant, but because of transphobia, fatphobia, racism, or other issues of oppression, they engage in reverse rape. It can be VERY harmful and cause lasting emotional trauma and insecurity, much like the typical meaning of the word rape.

Victims of reverse rape are still rape victims. It’s a serious matter and it makes me so depressed to see how it’s always overlooked and victims of reverse rape aren’t taken seriously.

-Mod Dash

#Mod Dash #Mod Dash speaks #text post #reverse rape #feminism #metoo #tw: rape #rape #fatphobia #transphobia #racism #oppression

the Dirty Faggots troll, no doubt #fundie fstdt.com

THE FUCKING LIBERAL LEFT IS AT IT AGAIN!!!!!!! 3 DAYS AGO THE FUCKING DUMBOCRATS PASSED A BILL THAT WOULD LEGALIZE GAY MARIAGE AND SUPPORT THE GAY AGENDA. THIS HAS MADE ME SO SICK TO MY STOMACH I CAN BARELY TYPE RIGHT NOW.
FOR ANY LIBERALS HERE I ASK YOU FACE TO FACE. WHY THE FUCK CANT YOU GET IT THROUGH YOUR CLOSED-MINDED MARXIST FUCKED UP MICROSCOPIC LITTLE BRAIN. MEN WHO FUCK OTHER MEN IN THE ASS ARE IMMORAL DO NOT BELONG IN OUR CHRISTIAN NATION. THIS IS ONE NATION UNDER GOD YOU PIECE OF SHIT.

PS: THERE IS NO FUCKING PROOF OF ANY GAY GENE SO SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU ASSHOLE LICKING MOTHER FUCKER!!!!!!

(one post later...)

YOU ARE ALSO FUCKING RUDE! YOU LIBERAL ATHEIST FUCKERS!!!

UninspiredGuy1 #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] The only point of life is to fuck girls with nice fat asses. Everything else is cope.

Everything we should do in life should be to obtain sex with a big booty girl.

sadly only chad can get this.

mostly agree

Birthing hips and curvy spine is all i care about, yet i cannot have this.

(((someone))) thought it was funny for men to live like this in the 2000s

Technology has absolutely destroyed the sexual market

I'm okay with a small ass

Jfl if u dont like jiggly ass and prefer disgusting sticks

You can easily get by without friends altogether if you fuck tons of foids 24/7 but even with hundreds of the most faithful friends you still cant live without foid affection and sex.

100% the truth i could less of a fuck of what giys think of me and hanging out with dudes

its just a dream at this point, only 8/10 and above chads can obtain that

Just kill me now if i cant eat some hot foids ass and fuck it all day long

Tits > ass.

So wrong

John Rees-Evans & Dr Julia Gasper #fundie independent.co.uk

A Ukip parliamentary candidate standing in Wales has claimed a “homosexual donkey” tried to rape his horse.

John Rees-Evans, who is running for Cardiff South and Penarth in May’s general election, told the bizarre story to protesters outside a new campaign office in Merthyr Tydfil.

An anti-Ukip demonstrator had asked him to respond to a string of controversial quotes by fellow party members, including on[e] from Dr Julia Gasper in Oxford, who allegedly claimed that “some homosexuals prefer sex with animals”.

“Actually, I’ve witnessed that,” Mr Rees-Evans responded. “I’ve got a horse and it was there in the field. And a donkey came up…which was male, and I’m afraid tried to rape my horse.”

The stallion bit the “homosexual donkey” in defence, the former soldier continued, saying he leapt to the animal’s defence and hit the horse to protect it.

“I don’t think that’s what she meant but it’s a coincidence,” he added.

Various TERFs #sexist lipstickalley.com

(in response to an article about a trans woman who says that there are times and places where sexual objectification is fine and that, in those places, she WANTS to be objectified. For extra fundie points, note how many of them have ironic names.)

PhenomenalWoman: (because you're mentally ill)

OrganizedJen: They need to get some mental help. You are not a woman. That is why you are not objectified like we are.
They know you're a fucking man!

ashbee: Only a man would say that.

YoungBougieBlac: These people need mental treatment. [...] I'm tired of them including "people of color" in their arguments. Stop comparing trans and being black period full stop

wecarealot: Because you're a fucking man. Of course men think sexual objectification is fine because they're usually the ones doing it. And in this case, this person wants to be objectified because they feel they're a woman inside even though they're biologically male.

Corgi: Trans women stay wanting to believe that they are no different from people born female. Everything regular women find harmful and degrading they find empowering because it validates their identity. We all know they need constant 24/7 validation.

LazyDaisy: it's even worse because here you are, a marginalized identity putting forth this image and promoting this culture that's rampant among transwomen that them being sexually desired makes them "accepted" or even coveted in society and that somehow they'll replace ciswomen because they're sought for sexually. No. Get help, now. You're only doing a disservice to yourself and other transwomen by promoting your sexual objectification as something positive.

cosmiclatte: They're weird as hell. Literally everything bio women can't stand they love and envy us for. Most women hate being cat called because it's rude and they know that there's a possiblity they could be sexually assaulted but trans/non binary people that are jealous of females see it as a sign of admiration.

Unnie: This person is clearly MALE because only MEN don't find an issue with viewing women as sex objects.

coolgirlia: Only a man would think that the essence of being a woman is being sexually oppressed.

BambiGambino: Everything about the trans-movement advocates for violence against women and the silencing of our issues because they're transphobia and offensive.

LaDela: it doesn't surprise me that a mentally ill male-bodied trans "woman" would feel this way. Most of them feel this way. People like this are a danger to the public and especially to biological women.

talkign2much: This "wanting to be sexually objectified" is male thinking. He can't deny his maleness. He's a damn fool. Why did I bother reading this mess? I need a shot of mango juice to calm down and forget about reading about this fool.

Dr.Girlfriend: How is he qualified to talk about women's issues when he can't even get pretending right?

80sIcons: Women do not like being objectified. But he's a man and has no idea on what it's like to be a woman.

JenThePen: Only a man would say or think this.

Duckieee: only a biological born male would think this is acceptable. You might have the female body parts and pronouns but you still clearly have the mentality of a man.

Terry Mcginnis: I'm not surprised that a man thinks it's okay to look at others as sub-human and see only value in a person's look. This is why I subscribe to terfism.

locacoca: This just in: men don't know what objectification is, never have, never will and also they don't know anything about feminism.

These wypipo also think their argument is valid if they stick 'white, cis, able-bodied' in front of everything then woc and disabled women must think "Oh they must be right" because we have no critical thinking skills whatsoever.

BotswanaB: He wishes straight men would objectify him like they do with real women.

Fetty Queen: Of course she wants to be objectified. She may have cut her dick off but she still has a male brain and men think this type of behavior is a compliment.

GeorgeSorrows: These people don't realize that biological sex is not just a matter of chromosomes. Sex has such a heavy influence on human physiology and that includes BRAIN physiology. IN GENERAL men and women don't process their environment the same way. That is, we may get to the same destination, but our pathways there will differ. This is not a matter of personality and socialization but a matter of BIOLOGY. Transwomen will still think like men.
The SRY gene expressed on the Y-chromosome makes SRY protein which is expressed in the testicles and in the BRAIN. Male brains differ from female brains
This is a FACT

IngaLou: Spoken like a true man! It seems like I never hear all these dumb things from transmen.

But I'm sure that's just a coincidence, right?

foreignincel #sexist google.hu

THE TOP TIER HUMANS MADE A PROPAGANDA TO KEEP PEOPLE COPING AND ACCEPTING THEIR SUB 8 LIFESTYLE.

How can you live knowing people out there are rich ,tall, attractive and get to live life to the fullest traveling around the world having awesome gfs and doing parties in private islands .

Human beings need to break that cope of a normal life and wish and aim for top quality notch life style,lol at normies for saying life isnt about sex IT FUCKING IS. LIFE IS ALL ABOUT GETTING ALL YOUR DESIRED REALIZED AND THE RICH WHITE ATTRACTIVE GUYS GET TO HAVE THAT LIFE EVERYDAY WHILE YOU ARE A FUCKING PEASANT WHO GET HIS ASS FUCKED EVERYDAY BY TAXES .

WAKE THE FUCK BETA REVOLUTION WHEN LIVE YOUR LIFE LIKE YOU WANT OR GET LOSE NORMIE DONT TELL ME LIFE IS HARSH FOR PEOPLE AND DOESNT TURN AROUND SEX BECAUSE IT FCKING IS FUCKING NORMIE SHIT IF YOU HAVE ACCEPTED YOUR LIFE THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP AND DONT COME HERE TELLING ME WHAT TO DO NORMIE.

I, IN ALL MY MAGNIFICENCE AND HOLINESS DESERVE A TOP NOTCH LIFE STYLE AND BREED WITH TOP TIER FEMALES AND GET MY OWN BRETHREN AND EMPIRE MY PERSONALITY IS UP THE ROOF AND I WILL NOT BE SATISFIED WITH SUCH A SUCKLING LIFE LIKE YOURS I DESERVE GLORY AND ATTENTION AND EVERY HUMAN BEING WHO BROKE THE COPING LIFESTYLE THINKING OF A SHEEP IS ENTITLED A LIFE OF PLEASURE AND LUXURY WHY DO KINGS GET TO ENJOY THEIR LIFE WHILE THE NORMIE MASSES BOW THEIR HEAD IS FUCKING BEYOND ME

HeatherInProgress #transphobia reddit.com

RE: Is being non passing ok?

Being Non-passing is ok provided you stay closeted and present as a man, do not intrude in womens' spaces, and do not reveal or acknowledge your Trans status in public spaces where other Cis or Trans people can see you physically.

It sounds like you're already doing that, so you're fine.

I know people like me make everyone of us look bad, they make other trans girls sad and self conscious asking themselves if this is what they really look like.

Only if you actively present. If you boymode permanently none of this applies as you're simply read as cis male and not as a TiM.

J.K. Rowling #transphobia jkrowling.com

This isn’t an easy piece to write, for reasons that will shortly become clear, but I know it’s time to explain myself on an issue surrounded by toxicity. I write this without any desire to add to that toxicity.

For people who don’t know: last December I tweeted my support for Maya Forstater, a tax specialist who’d lost her job for what were deemed ‘transphobic’ tweets. She took her case to an employment tribunal, asking the judge to rule on whether a philosophical belief that sex is determined by biology is protected in law. Judge Tayler ruled that it wasn’t.

My interest in trans issues pre-dated Maya’s case by almost two years, during which I followed the debate around the concept of gender identity closely. I’ve met trans people, and read sundry books, blogs and articles by trans people, gender specialists, intersex people, psychologists, safeguarding experts, social workers and doctors, and followed the discourse online and in traditional media. On one level, my interest in this issue has been professional, because I’m writing a crime series, set in the present day, and my fictional female detective is of an age to be interested in, and affected by, these issues herself, but on another, it’s intensely personal, as I’m about to explain.

All the time I’ve been researching and learning, accusations and threats from trans activists have been bubbling in my Twitter timeline. This was initially triggered by a ‘like’. When I started taking an interest in gender identity and transgender matters, I began screenshotting comments that interested me, as a way of reminding myself what I might want to research later. On one occasion, I absent-mindedly ‘liked’ instead of screenshotting. That single ‘like’ was deemed evidence of wrongthink, and a persistent low level of harassment began.

Months later, I compounded my accidental ‘like’ crime by following Magdalen Burns on Twitter. Magdalen was an immensely brave young feminist and lesbian who was dying of an aggressive brain tumour. I followed her because I wanted to contact her directly, which I succeeded in doing. However, as Magdalen was a great believer in the importance of biological sex, and didn’t believe lesbians should be called bigots for not dating trans women with penises, dots were joined in the heads of twitter trans activists, and the level of social media abuse increased.

I mention all this only to explain that I knew perfectly well what was going to happen when I supported Maya. I must have been on my fourth or fifth cancellation by then. I expected the threats of violence, to be told I was literally killing trans people with my hate, to be called cunt and bitch and, of course, for my books to be burned, although one particularly abusive man told me he’d composted them.

What I didn’t expect in the aftermath of my cancellation was the avalanche of emails and letters that came showering down upon me, the overwhelming majority of which were positive, grateful and supportive. They came from a cross-section of kind, empathetic and intelligent people, some of them working in fields dealing with gender dysphoria and trans people, who’re all deeply concerned about the way a socio-political concept is influencing politics, medical practice and safeguarding. They’re worried about the dangers to young people, gay people and about the erosion of women’s and girl’s rights. Above all, they’re worried about a climate of fear that serves nobody – least of all trans youth – well.

I’d stepped back from Twitter for many months both before and after tweeting support for Maya, because I knew it was doing nothing good for my mental health. I only returned because I wanted to share a free children’s book during the pandemic. Immediately, activists who clearly believe themselves to be good, kind and progressive people swarmed back into my timeline, assuming a right to police my speech, accuse me of hatred, call me misogynistic slurs and, above all – as every woman involved in this debate will know – TERF.

If you didn’t already know – and why should you? – ‘TERF’ is an acronym coined by trans activists, which stands for Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist. In practice, a huge and diverse cross-section of women are currently being called TERFs and the vast majority have never been radical feminists. Examples of so-called TERFs range from the mother of a gay child who was afraid their child wanted to transition to escape homophobic bullying, to a hitherto totally unfeminist older lady who’s vowed never to visit Marks & Spencer again because they’re allowing any man who says they identify as a woman into the women’s changing rooms. Ironically, radical feminists aren’t even trans-exclusionary – they include trans men in their feminism, because they were born women.

But accusations of TERFery have been sufficient to intimidate many people, institutions and organisations I once admired, who’re cowering before the tactics of the playground. ‘They’ll call us transphobic!’ ‘They’ll say I hate trans people!’ What next, they’ll say you’ve got fleas? Speaking as a biological woman, a lot of people in positions of power really need to grow a pair (which is doubtless literally possible, according to the kind of people who argue that clownfish prove humans aren’t a dimorphic species).

So why am I doing this? Why speak up? Why not quietly do my research and keep my head down?

Well, I’ve got five reasons for being worried about the new trans activism, and deciding I need to speak up.

Firstly, I have a charitable trust that focuses on alleviating social deprivation in Scotland, with a particular emphasis on women and children. Among other things, my trust supports projects for female prisoners and for survivors of domestic and sexual abuse. I also fund medical research into MS, a disease that behaves very differently in men and women. It’s been clear to me for a while that the new trans activism is having (or is likely to have, if all its demands are met) a significant impact on many of the causes I support, because it’s pushing to erode the legal definition of sex and replace it with gender.

The second reason is that I’m an ex-teacher and the founder of a children’s charity, which gives me an interest in both education and safeguarding. Like many others, I have deep concerns about the effect the trans rights movement is having on both.

The third is that, as a much-banned author, I’m interested in freedom of speech and have publicly defended it, even unto Donald Trump.

The fourth is where things start to get truly personal. I’m concerned about the huge explosion in young women wishing to transition and also about the increasing numbers who seem to be detransitioning (returning to their original sex), because they regret taking steps that have, in some cases, altered their bodies irrevocably, and taken away their fertility. Some say they decided to transition after realising they were same-sex attracted, and that transitioning was partly driven by homophobia, either in society or in their families.

Most people probably aren’t aware – I certainly wasn’t, until I started researching this issue properly – that ten years ago, the majority of people wanting to transition to the opposite sex were male. That ratio has now reversed. The UK has experienced a 4400% increase in girls being referred for transitioning treatment. Autistic girls are hugely overrepresented in their numbers.

The same phenomenon has been seen in the US. In 2018, American physician and researcher Lisa Littman set out to explore it. In an interview, she said:

‘Parents online were describing a very unusual pattern of transgender-identification where multiple friends and even entire friend groups became transgender-identified at the same time. I would have been remiss had I not considered social contagion and peer influences as potential factors.’

Littman mentioned Tumblr, Reddit, Instagram and YouTube as contributing factors to Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria, where she believes that in the realm of transgender identification ‘youth have created particularly insular echo chambers.’

Her paper caused a furore. She was accused of bias and of spreading misinformation about transgender people, subjected to a tsunami of abuse and a concerted campaign to discredit both her and her work. The journal took the paper offline and re-reviewed it before republishing it. However, her career took a similar hit to that suffered by Maya Forstater. Lisa Littman had dared challenge one of the central tenets of trans activism, which is that a person’s gender identity is innate, like sexual orientation. Nobody, the activists insisted, could ever be persuaded into being trans.

The argument of many current trans activists is that if you don’t let a gender dysphoric teenager transition, they will kill themselves. In an article explaining why he resigned from the Tavistock (an NHS gender clinic in England) psychiatrist Marcus Evans stated that claims that children will kill themselves if not permitted to transition do not ‘align substantially with any robust data or studies in this area. Nor do they align with the cases I have encountered over decades as a psychotherapist.’

The writings of young trans men reveal a group of notably sensitive and clever people. The more of their accounts of gender dysphoria I’ve read, with their insightful descriptions of anxiety, dissociation, eating disorders, self-harm and self-hatred, the more I’ve wondered whether, if I’d been born 30 years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge. I struggled with severe OCD as a teenager. If I’d found community and sympathy online that I couldn’t find in my immediate environment, I believe I could have been persuaded to turn myself into the son my father had openly said he’d have preferred.

When I read about the theory of gender identity, I remember how mentally sexless I felt in youth. I remember Colette’s description of herself as a ‘mental hermaphrodite’ and Simone de Beauvoir’s words: ‘It is perfectly natural for the future woman to feel indignant at the limitations posed upon her by her sex. The real question is not why she should reject them: the problem is rather to understand why she accepts them.’

As I didn’t have a realistic possibility of becoming a man back in the 1980s, it had to be books and music that got me through both my mental health issues and the sexualised scrutiny and judgement that sets so many girls to war against their bodies in their teens. Fortunately for me, I found my own sense of otherness, and my ambivalence about being a woman, reflected in the work of female writers and musicians who reassured me that, in spite of everything a sexist world tries to throw at the female-bodied, it’s fine not to feel pink, frilly and compliant inside your own head; it’s OK to feel confused, dark, both sexual and non-sexual, unsure of what or who you are.

I want to be very clear here: I know transition will be a solution for some gender dysphoric people, although I’m also aware through extensive research that studies have consistently shown that between 60-90% of gender dysphoric teens will grow out of their dysphoria. Again and again I’ve been told to ‘just meet some trans people.’ I have: in addition to a few younger people, who were all adorable, I happen to know a self-described transsexual woman who’s older than I am and wonderful. Although she’s open about her past as a gay man, I’ve always found it hard to think of her as anything other than a woman, and I believe (and certainly hope) she’s completely happy to have transitioned. Being older, though, she went through a long and rigorous process of evaluation, psychotherapy and staged transformation. The current explosion of trans activism is urging a removal of almost all the robust systems through which candidates for sex reassignment were once required to pass. A man who intends to have no surgery and take no hormones may now secure himself a Gender Recognition Certificate and be a woman in the sight of the law. Many people aren’t aware of this.

We’re living through the most misogynistic period I’ve experienced. Back in the 80s, I imagined that my future daughters, should I have any, would have it far better than I ever did, but between the backlash against feminism and a porn-saturated online culture, I believe things have got significantly worse for girls. Never have I seen women denigrated and dehumanised to the extent they are now. From the leader of the free world’s long history of sexual assault accusations and his proud boast of ‘grabbing them by the pussy’, to the incel (‘involuntarily celibate’) movement that rages against women who won’t give them sex, to the trans activists who declare that TERFs need punching and re-educating, men across the political spectrum seem to agree: women are asking for trouble. Everywhere, women are being told to shut up and sit down, or else.

I’ve read all the arguments about femaleness not residing in the sexed body, and the assertions that biological women don’t have common experiences, and I find them, too, deeply misogynistic and regressive. It’s also clear that one of the objectives of denying the importance of sex is to erode what some seem to see as the cruelly segregationist idea of women having their own biological realities or – just as threatening – unifying realities that make them a cohesive political class. The hundreds of emails I’ve received in the last few days prove this erosion concerns many others just as much. It isn’t enough for women to be trans allies. Women must accept and admit that there is no material difference between trans women and themselves.

But, as many women have said before me, ‘woman’ is not a costume. ‘Woman’ is not an idea in a man’s head. ‘Woman’ is not a pink brain, a liking for Jimmy Choos or any of the other sexist ideas now somehow touted as progressive. Moreover, the ‘inclusive’ language that calls female people ‘menstruators’ and ‘people with vulvas’ strikes many women as dehumanising and demeaning. I understand why trans activists consider this language to be appropriate and kind, but for those of us who’ve had degrading slurs spat at us by violent men, it’s not neutral, it’s hostile and alienating.

Which brings me to the fifth reason I’m deeply concerned about the consequences of the current trans activism.

I’ve been in the public eye now for over twenty years and have never talked publicly about being a domestic abuse and sexual assault survivor. This isn’t because I’m ashamed those things happened to me, but because they’re traumatic to revisit and remember. I also feel protective of my daughter from my first marriage. I didn’t want to claim sole ownership of a story that belongs to her, too. However, a short while ago, I asked her how she’d feel if I were publicly honest about that part of my life, and she encouraged me to go ahead.

I’m mentioning these things now not in an attempt to garner sympathy, but out of solidarity with the huge numbers of women who have histories like mine, who’ve been slurred as bigots for having concerns around single-sex spaces.

I managed to escape my first violent marriage with some difficulty, but I’m now married to a truly good and principled man, safe and secure in ways I never in a million years expected to be. However, the scars left by violence and sexual assault don’t disappear, no matter how loved you are, and no matter how much money you’ve made. My perennial jumpiness is a family joke – and even I know it’s funny – but I pray my daughters never have the same reasons I do for hating sudden loud noises, or finding people behind me when I haven’t heard them approaching.

If you could come inside my head and understand what I feel when I read about a trans woman dying at the hands of a violent man, you’d find solidarity and kinship. I have a visceral sense of the terror in which those trans women will have spent their last seconds on earth, because I too have known moments of blind fear when I realised that the only thing keeping me alive was the shaky self-restraint of my attacker.

I believe the majority of trans-identified people not only pose zero threat to others, but are vulnerable for all the reasons I’ve outlined. Trans people need and deserve protection. Like women, they’re most likely to be killed by sexual partners. Trans women who work in the sex industry, particularly trans women of colour, are at particular risk. Like every other domestic abuse and sexual assault survivor I know, I feel nothing but empathy and solidarity with trans women who’ve been abused by men.

So I want trans women to be safe. At the same time, I do not want to make natal girls and women less safe. When you throw open the doors of bathrooms and changing rooms to any man who believes or feels he’s a woman – and, as I’ve said, gender confirmation certificates may now be granted without any need for surgery or hormones – then you open the door to any and all men who wish to come inside. That is the simple truth.

On Saturday morning, I read that the Scottish government is proceeding with its controversial gender recognition plans, which will in effect mean that all a man needs to ‘become a woman’ is to say he’s one. To use a very contemporary word, I was ‘triggered’. Ground down by the relentless attacks from trans activists on social media, when I was only there to give children feedback about pictures they’d drawn for my book under lockdown, I spent much of Saturday in a very dark place inside my head, as memories of a serious sexual assault I suffered in my twenties recurred on a loop. That assault happened at a time and in a space where I was vulnerable, and a man capitalised on an opportunity. I couldn’t shut out those memories and I was finding it hard to contain my anger and disappointment about the way I believe my government is playing fast and loose with womens and girls’ safety.

Late on Saturday evening, scrolling through children’s pictures before I went to bed, I forgot the first rule of Twitter – never, ever expect a nuanced conversation – and reacted to what I felt was degrading language about women. I spoke up about the importance of sex and have been paying the price ever since. I was transphobic, I was a cunt, a bitch, a TERF, I deserved cancelling, punching and death. You are Voldemort said one person, clearly feeling this was the only language I’d understand.

It would be so much easier to tweet the approved hashtags – because of course trans rights are human rights and of course trans lives matter – scoop up the woke cookies and bask in a virtue-signalling afterglow. There’s joy, relief and safety in conformity. As Simone de Beauvoir also wrote, “… without a doubt it is more comfortable to endure blind bondage than to work for one’s liberation; the dead, too, are better suited to the earth than the living.”

Huge numbers of women are justifiably terrified by the trans activists; I know this because so many have got in touch with me to tell their stories. They’re afraid of doxxing, of losing their jobs or their livelihoods, and of violence.

But endlessly unpleasant as its constant targeting of me has been, I refuse to bow down to a movement that I believe is doing demonstrable harm in seeking to erode ‘woman’ as a political and biological class and offering cover to predators like few before it. I stand alongside the brave women and men, gay, straight and trans, who’re standing up for freedom of speech and thought, and for the rights and safety of some of the most vulnerable in our society: young gay kids, fragile teenagers, and women who’re reliant on and wish to retain their single sex spaces. Polls show those women are in the vast majority, and exclude only those privileged or lucky enough never to have come up against male violence or sexual assault, and who’ve never troubled to educate themselves on how prevalent it is.

The one thing that gives me hope is that the women who can protest and organise, are doing so, and they have some truly decent men and trans people alongside them. Political parties seeking to appease the loudest voices in this debate are ignoring women’s concerns at their peril. In the UK, women are reaching out to each other across party lines, concerned about the erosion of their hard-won rights and widespread intimidation. None of the gender critical women I’ve talked to hates trans people; on the contrary. Many of them became interested in this issue in the first place out of concern for trans youth, and they’re hugely sympathetic towards trans adults who simply want to live their lives, but who’re facing a backlash for a brand of activism they don’t endorse. The supreme irony is that the attempt to silence women with the word ‘TERF’ may have pushed more young women towards radical feminism than the movement’s seen in decades.

The last thing I want to say is this. I haven’t written this essay in the hope that anybody will get out a violin for me, not even a teeny-weeny one. I’m extraordinarily fortunate; I’m a survivor, certainly not a victim. I’ve only mentioned my past because, like every other human being on this planet, I have a complex backstory, which shapes my fears, my interests and my opinions. I never forget that inner complexity when I’m creating a fictional character and I certainly never forget it when it comes to trans people.

All I’m asking – all I want – is for similar empathy, similar understanding, to be extended to the many millions of women whose sole crime is wanting their concerns to be heard without receiving threats and abuse.

chimpburger, AnOminous, et. al. #fundie kiwifarms.net

[Highlights from a conversation about Fundies Say the Darndest Things on Kiwi Farms, where the OP challenged people to "find shit on there and their super spergy posts."]

chimpburgers: Haha these guys again.

They can shove their tranny communist white knighting right back where it came from as far as I'm concerned cause that's what this site looks like to me.

Proof of the blatant communism over there. Their pussy spines crackle when they hear about Trump.

[...]

AnOminous: It used to be actually about fundies. Now it's about them REEEEing at anything that triggers their euphoria and causes their fedoras to fly off.

[...]

NotCobalt: Yeah. But back then they actually made fun of the lulcows, known as fundies. Both sandniggers and jesustards were fair game.

I remember this fag was a huge target:
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/LoneWolf1984

[...]

StarvingAutist: One of the comments linked in the OP called us an "alt-right/GamerGate safe space", probably because he falls into the "if you complain about SJWs then you're a racist" bullshit.

[...]

TimeToTurn: A formerly great site. 2016 Presidential election pretty much finished off everything great about the site. It used to be "Look at some crazy nut on X site", now it's "look at some mean thing a Republican said" and most of the posts were reposts from other left-wing blogs. Once gay marriage got legalised in the US, even the funny homophobia mostly stopped. It's too bad, because there's still tons of exceptional websites run by religious idiots of all faiths, but they'd rather just whine about what Donald Trump did this week. Distind's departure was basically the last straw of the devolution of FSTDT.

Haven't been on there in a while. Don't really feel like it. It was fun being left-wing and being a self-professed authoritarian at the same time, which got me quoted so many times. I just have to play an over-the-top version of what I believe IRL and they would get so triggered. Lots of great discussion was to be had, both from the SJWs freaking out and then the people who were actually semi-intelligent.

My scientific analysis blames this on the fact that FSTDT emerged with the New Atheism movement (along with Rational Wiki and other shit) and as that movement declined into infighting and irrelevance, so did its offspring, which is a reason why Rational Wiki and FSTDT (a proud partner of Rational Wiki) are shite nowadays.

I'm probably reminiscing too much now. Eh, right now I'm about as drunk as I was whenever I'd post there. Thanks for the thread, you Kiwi Farmers, even though I'll regret posting here before long.

@FelineDarkmage

I'm trying so hard right now to see the remnants of good on this site. But TimetoTurn does have a point about us being autistic as fuck. And @autism420 is still Islamic IMO.

Thanks man. Should be no surprise to you that a fellow autist like me would show up here. Autists there hate me. But it was glad I learned that all spergs needed to believe the same things about autism OR ELSE.

[...]

NotCobalt: [in response to a user making a list of quotes from the topic] What list? The one of "people you want to have sex with" or the one "These exceptional individuals used to belong to an ancient forum with like perhaps 500 active members, so they probably know each other, and I wish I had been a part of that cool kids club back when, but instead I was too poor to afford internet, so I just cried all day instead"?

[...]

sikotik: The site started going down hill as early as 2008 when every other user became a tranny &/or easily triggered furry.

[...]

TimeToTurn: Never knew Marjan got banned, but I can assume he would with the new administration. Distind only banned spammers and shit. The new administration seems intent on making it a "safe space". Even though they always made fun of other websites like Free Republic and Rapture Ready for "suppressing free speech". I can't post shit messing with them (or I could, if I had a day to waste). So Marjan/caamib/whatever he calls himself can't do the same. I'd assume Marjan might be back at some point, but I don't really care to investigate. They really hate TOR, too, nowadays.

David J. Stewart I'm sure is as crazy as always, but him getting any crazier would take divine intervention and I'd just await either reports of his death (guy's a painkiller addict) or more dealings with the Guam government.

[...]

Dr W: The problem was that they didn't branch out into mocking SJWs. That's what kept Kiwi Farms rather politically inert. Instead, they allowed a core of crazy tranny furry dipshits to eject fecal matter everywhere.

Damn shame, I used to love that site.

[...]

rianzi: Shame how the site became infested by SJWS. It used to be a nice place where you could laugh at religious loons.

Craig Chilton #racist groups.google.com

Ass fucking is wrong and the homosexuals must be punished for ass
fucking.
Matthew Shepard paid the price for his sins.
All homosexuals must pay the price for such dirty behavior.
The preferable method of atonement is death because God will judge them. [...]

It is not considered bigotry to hate the Jew murderers, Homosexual dick-
suckers Lesbian cunt-lickers or ghetto Niggers.
The Jews are nothing more then cheats, con artists and murderers.
Niggers hate us as much as we hate them.
If you do not believe me try walking through Nigger-town at midnight.
Be sure to leave your wallet at home.
I am not prejudiced against Niggers, I believe everybody ought to own a
few.

Joe Marine 76 #fundie freerepublic.com

Okay,... I’ve been holding my tongue on this issue for a long, ...long time and it has NOTHING to do with whether a “Trump” has served in the military or not.

To begin with, that argument is a “non sequitur.” I AM a Retired US Marine Major, so please permit me: The Rand Corporation did a study and reported there are somewhere between 3,000 and 6,000 (if I remember the figure correctly) “transgenders” serving in the Active US Armed Forces. The study did NOT include members of the US National Guard or the Reserve Components of the Regular Services, i.e, US Army, USMC, US Navy, and US Air Force. The “transgenders” are those who identify as the opposite sex; ...cross-dress up at night out in town, in the barracks or in their off-base quarters, in attire opposite their birth sex? That said, here’s where this issue gets complicated: Do any of you readers here think that the US Armed Forces, vis a vis, the American Taxpayer should pay for “gender reassignment surgeries?” Gender reassignment surgeries can cost around $132,000 per. Added to that, is the cost AND time spent for follow-up $1200 per month hormone therapy treatment and hours AND hours of counseling by DoD Doctors and Psychologists at whatever base to which they are assigned.

And with the post surgery “down-time,” these individuals would be for upwards of 240 days, in a “Non-Deployable” status. So, who takes the place of the Marine Infantryman (MOS 0331), now a “Reassigned Transgendered Male,” who was scheduled to go afloat, but now can’t, with the Amphibious Readiness Group-Landing Force of a Marine Expeditionary Unit because “he” is having post-op complications? What happens when the trans-individual Marine has post-surgery physical complications and is afloat with the Navy; or in some instance, the individual happens to be a Soldier or Airman stationed with US Armed Forces in Germany or South Korea? What happens if a reassigned trans-individual has psychological complications in dealing with their condition and their new “sex” while deployed elsewhere in the world... let’s say, in Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean... or Adak, Alaska... or Reykjavik, Iceland?

Also, do we give these individual “special dispensation” from serving in these duty stations? Who’s the service member who has to take their place in these sometimes “hardship duty stations?” Your son or your daughter? Now if a guy or a gal wishes to play dress-up, “Play House” or play the role of “Buckeroo Banzai” in the barracks or wherever, they can have at it, for all I’m concerned. During my service time as a Commanding Officer or Executive Officer of a Company and Battalion, I’ve gotten worse Monday morning reports from the Barracks Duty NCO after many, many payday weekends!

Trust me. But when we go “down the rabbit hole” to taxpayer-funded reassignment surgeries in our Armed Forces, we are embarking on a truly wasteful and unnecessary venture. How many transgenders will seek the opportunity for taxpayer and “free” gender reassignment surgery? Do we give this costly and time consuming surgery to “Private Joseph P. Schmuckatella USMC” because all of a sudden he “thinks” he is a girl and wants to become “Josephine?” Do we allow others to enlist, get the surgery and then all of a sudden, it seems, they “can’t handle the military” because of “psychological issues?” This whole “transgenders serving in the military” issue is pure “PC” nonsense... of course there are gays and transgenders in the military.

There always has been.... we were not always sure who they were; sometimes one could make a pretty good guess though,.... no homophobia or transphobia here.... just plain horse sense with regard to who pays for gender reassignment surgeries. Now, everyone wants to point to Chris (”Kristen”) Beck, the RETIRED Navy SEAL who was a “transgender” while serving in the Navy. All well and good. I honestly thank him for his service and his heroics. I don’t know if he had the gender reassignment surgery after he retired to become a “female,” but I know he lied when he said he was a member or SEAL Team 6 when it took out Osama Bin Ladin.

He actually retired about six months before that expedition. I served twenty years as a Commissioned Officer with Fleet Marine Force Units in the 2nd Marine Division, 1st and 2nd Marine Aircraft Wings; 1st Marine Expeditionary Brigade and with I MEF in the Persian Gulf (Ops Desert Sheild - Desert Storm). I went through the Officers Candidate Course at Quantico, VA and served as the Logistics Officer (Special Staff - 4) for the Recruit Training Regiment at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, SC. I experienced “becoming a Marine” as an Officer Candidate and personally witnessed the magnificent tranformation of fine American youth, male and female, to “becoming US Marines” at MCRD, Parris Island. As Commanders and Marine Officers, we are responsible for FIRST, the “MIssion” and SECONDLY, “Troop Welfare.” Added to that, we have a responsibility for “Unit Cohesion” and folks, this PC nonsense is NOT included in that part of our responsibilities.

This is not a game or “social experiment.” Marines and other Armed Forces Military Members lives are on the line here. Having said all this: Please let me direct you to Dr. Paul McHugh’s, from Johns Hopkins, study about “Gender Dysphoria.” You can google it. He has studied “Gender Dysphoria” for OVER 40 years. He is dead set against Gender Reassignment Surgery. And parents are doing a great disserve to their chlldren when they let them go down that road. Why? Upwards of 40 - 48% of transgenders attempt suicide. Dr. McHugh’s salient point: “Males will never truly become females and females will never truly become males.” So, do we want those who are having psychological issues on the front lines in combat alongside fellow Marines or Soldiers with fully loaded arms? You be the judge of Dr. McHugh’s work and determine for yourself if there’s not something wrong with “trangenders” entering our military.

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(GoffSystemQB)

[JFL] IT's resident camwhore admits to fucking her high school bully. (IT FAGS WON'T TOUCH THIS)

high school bullies, i had my share

i've recently encounter one and we had a talk, he apologized for calling me "cow tits" he told me he was passing through some rough times at his home and it was his form of venting, and also liked my boobs

same superficial, narcisistic prick as in HS

Good on bed but besides that, i wouldn't even watch on the same direction as him

She is a walking blackpill and people on that subreddit have the gall to try and deny the blackpill and gaslight us. What clown shit.

Inceltears won't touch this

Added it in the title to try and bait them.

0 points instead of reddit gold Maybe they are finally uncucking kek

Naw a bunch of brocels brigaded the comment downvoting her and laughing at the state of IT and all their posts were deleted.

An addendum she will never fuck an incel which she claims fund her whoredom business. Why is that exactly? Because of looks? You've already proven you will fuck a guy with a terrible personality (self-described by you).

What exactly is the reason you won't fuck an incel?

Well they literally just proved incels right so the incels in denial on there naturally are seething

Post got brigaded and locked after her comment so not quite. Most people on IT didn't even see the comment.

IT touched this:

Also she admitted in the post that the guy didn't change and was still a narcissistic douchebag and that she regrets nothing. Bluepilled incels reading this with confused faces.

.

Sorry to bump my thread again, but a bluepilled incel who browses IT was upset by the post he saw here and reached out to her about it and she told him to "suffer in silence."

What a callous bitch and IT allowing her to post but banning me for having different opinions just proves their entire shitty ideology wrong.

Dunno why he expected anything less from a cam whore. Cam whores are pretty much the worst of the worst women, they see everyone as objects for them to exploit. If you have no immediate monetary gain to them they pretty much wish you didn't exist. They're all bonafide psychopaths, although cucks still give them money for some reason. Only thing I'd ever want to send a cam whore is into a gas chamber.

Who knows there a lot of messed up bluepilled incels with a lot of problems browsing IT. Hopefully he sees that these people aren't out to help him.

(Diocel)

but he have a bad personality, i don't get it, doesn't personality matter ?

(Lonelycel)

Trashes him for the whole post but then says she allowed his penis to enter her private parts

Wtf is wrong with these people...

(Konon)

That's women for you. If you're not a misogynist, you're low IQ.

(mental_out)

Well they literally just proved incels right so the incels in denial on there naturally are seething after spending all their time insisting its totally about personality, while women fuck men they straight up admit they dont like on a personal level

(ShySaxon)

It’s over for IT. Every time they say personality matters, show them this.

(Personalityinkwell)

I remember I made a post about how women fuck bullies and they got all fussy about it.

I was right. Bullies are the cool kids

FagnarHairyBalls #sexist reddit.com

[Comments under "Merry Christmas to everyone who isn't a single mom"]

@blueeyes239

@FagnarHairyBalls
@blueeyes239
@FagnarHairyBalls
@blueeyes239
@FagnarHairyBalls
@blueeyes239
Hey, guess what? It's me again. And I've got something to say to you. Not every single mother was a prostitute. Some were rape victims. Though by your fucked up logic, that's basically consenting anyway. I don't care if you downvote me. It won't change the fact that you're an immoral sociopath.

Rape victims are sluts.

Tell me, why do you think that?

Because it’s true.

So, if you were raped, you'd be a slut? And before you argue, yes, men can be raped.

No we can't. lol

Wrong. You just say you can't because your deluded mind has made you THINK you're superior to all others, when in reality, you are just a piece of trash. And I take out the trash.

Posted by FagnarHairyBalls:

I'm the rapist, not the victim. Any man who gets raped is a beta subhuman.

Facilis #fundie scienceblogs.com

I'll do my own humorous summary
"Debating with an atheist"
Atheist: I deny the existence of air
Facilis: what?? You're breathing now. Air is the necessary precondition for breathing.
A: No. I see no reason why air is necessary for breathing. I am breathing now and i don't believe in air.
F: It the impossibility of the contrary. What else could you be breathing.
A: That is just an air of the gaps fallacy.You just insert air into the gaps since you do not know how people breathe.
F:But how else can you account for breathing?
A:I'm just breathing because that is the way it is. I'm still going to deny the existence of air.

Higgscel & Various TERFs #sexist #transphobia incels.co

[LifeFuel] You made your bed, now sleep in it bitch.

Over.

I feel like the fight is over. Women have lost.

This morning I learned USA Swimming decided to follow IOC transgender policies for their junior divisions, Scottish government declaring men with penises in women's private areas are no different than women with different bodies like those who had mastectomy, and saw multiple threads of universities low-key changing all single-sex bathrooms into gender neutral bathrooms.

When Trump won the White House, the TV adaptation of The Handmaid's Tale was at its height of popularity. A girl friend of mine in Scotland was telling me that our western democratic societies can turn like this overnight. I didn't really agree with her at the time. Trump in the White House was alarming, but I also thought it was liberal fearmongering to think our entire social structure can be torn away and all of women's rights being taken away just like that. Surely this couldn't happen, right? Our systems are well-entrenched and women would rise up and raise hell if something like this ever happen.

3 years later and here we are. The only crazy thing is that it's not the radical conservative right that is bringing forth this dystopian world for women. It's the Woke Left--the very people who fearmongered women about how bad Trump and the Republicans would be for women. What a fking bait and switch! Here we are, I'm watching, flabbergasted, how women's rights are being taken away overnight just like that. Yes indeed, they can just do it. (For the record, this is not a pro-Trump post. But I can't hold it back anymore how utterly beyond shock I am that this vengeance against women is coming from the left. I'm at the point where I feel like the conservative right is actually benign, that's how shell-shocked I am.)

And not only are women not rising up and raising hell. Tons of them--all of them on Wokes--are now fking Serena Joy and Aunt Lydia, crucifying other women for mortal offenses like "misgendering" and gaslighting other women to strip them of their basic instinct to believe their guts when they're feeling vulnerable.

I feel so oppressed and helpless right now. It doesn't matter how loud we all scream to be heard. The powers that be really can just overnight take it all away. This is not a drill.

And they'll continue to oppress us, while scaring us with the same old rhetorics about how our right to choice will be taken away to threaten us to fold to their side. As long as we are blinded to keep our eyes only on the fight against the conservative right to think that's the only threat to us, women won't see what they're doing. Women won't see what's coming. And the younger generations of women will simply be groomed and conditioned to the New World Order.

I literally feel sick. I want off this train.

ETA: changed "single bathroom" to "single-sex bathrooms." And thanks for the silver.

And over.

Men wanting to be seen as cute young girls is infuriating

Signed, a 4"11 woman, hovering around 90lbs, who will never walk into a room and be respected. I'm in my mid-twenties, multiple times a day I get told I look like a child. I'm fetishized constantly, get dirty looks and disgusting comments whenever I'm out with my child, can't go to work without being asked if I'm old enough to serve alcohol. When I ask not to be called cute, or picked up and prodded, I'm told it's a fucking compliment. It's very depressing feeling like I won't be seen as a woman until I'm middle-aged.

At first, I really tried to understand the trans community. I don't feel comfortable in my body either, and in my head I'm 6 feet tall and built like a tank, but seeing grown ass men "child play" is the most disgusting and offensive thing I've ever had the displeasure of discovering.

And over again.

Painting your face and/or nails doesn't change your gender! Makeup is not a gender!

This won't be my most eloquent post here but I'm at my wits' end.

Sorry, I just feel like screaming right now. I work in a job where I could be fired for expressing even the slightest hint that I might be gender critical and it's non-binary day or some other nonsense. I keep seeing all these posters with bearded dudes in neon eyeshadow or young women with short hair and glitter and I just want to scream! Makeup! Isn't! A! Gender!

Where will this regressive nonsense end? I already had to back away from a friendship with a dude who came out as a they/them and immediately started spouting off on how cis women are oppressing him because he sometimes gets questioned by his parents about wearing eyeliner and someone hesitated before holding the door to the women's toilet open for him. A grown man!

I honestly think the nonbinary bullshit is more harmful and regressive than the trans stuff. I could sympathise with trans medicalists to a degree. This just reeks of "not like the other girls" and "I need some oppression points."

I work with people in poverty. I work with people with learning disorders and disabilities who've had their utilities cut off. I help recovering addicts go about getting enough food to live. I see young mums who were forced away from abortions by restrictive communities now struggling with actual starvation and violence at home. I help abused women find a shelter for their pets so their partners can't murder the animal when she tries to escape.

I see actual oppression every damn day. I've been on the breadline. I'm disabled. I know oppression.

You painting your nails and getting "Sir"-ed at the local grocery store isn't oppression. Grow up!

These women will complain about trannies. And no, not cherry picking, these posts are all "top" in their subreddit, in the last week.
Despite probably the same women who pushed for these tranny degeneracy and sexual openness, thanks to their PC nature.
Women invading male spaces? Empowering. Men in skirts invading your bathroom? In my opinion, "Deserving". Get ready for the 2020 Olympics ladies, men in skirts are after your world records.

Anywhoo, doesn't it feel good that both enemies are starting to have a go at one another? Get fucked both of you.

Unknown #racist obamaisabitch.wordpress.com

image

Polls taken during World War II indicated the majority of Americans identified “the uncontrolled Negro” as “a greater danger to the nation” than “a Jap soldier” and more dangerous than “a Nazi” throughout the entire war!!! Funny how we elected a Communist, Muslim, Racist, Liberal Negro Nazi as president!!! Training one to kill, to murder and then sleep like a child to awaken refreshed, thinking what a glorious day to sink a knife into someone’s belly starting all over again with a new wind of righteous ice-hatred, is essentially just remembering that killing, in the end, is part of everyman’s natural inheritance. So, claim the same proud place in history where your ancestors once stood!!!

When will real men and women decide to unleash the torrent of bitter cravings for revenge against the traitorous liberal scum in Washington?!!! No more illegal immigration, no more robbing from our future generations, no more endlessly taxing the people, no more stupid environmentalism, no more gay marriage bullshit, no more United Nations, no more redistribution of wealth, and no more multiculturalism and diversity only the indescribable rapture and harmonious euphoria of breathing in deep the fresh blood of a fucking liberal politician or the blood of any liberal killed by bullets, bombs, or whatever is available!!! Of course, I’m not advocating or condoning any violence and/or criminal activity against any liberal or politician!!! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!!!

But only with such a radical approach can conservatives, libertarians, and white people even exist in 500 years, essentially because we shall make them choose between living life in fear or living life by design physically separate from us or not living at all!!! Learn from our own recent past. Let them know you are already smelling them out!!! Make ‘em terrified!!! This is what all piece of shit Liberal Democrats and Liberal Republicans deserve!!! Death to All Liberals!!!

discourseworms #fundie discourseworms.tumblr.com

“Aphobe” has absolutely no power or history behind it. It has no power to do anything but make people laugh because its not aimed at actual oppressors because there is no ace oppression. So what do they do to feed their fear mongering bullshit? They use terms for those who oppress other groups to scare people. They use terms like terf rhetoric and biphobe when the topic has nothing to do with actual terf rhetoric or biphobe rhetoric.

And I am watching as they slowly try changing the definition of terf/twerf and moving it away from transmisogyny, transphobia and misogyny so they can give their “you’re aphobic” claims more power.

They are removing the definition so we cant use it to specifically refer to terfs and their harm to trans woman.

They are sticking with their claim that cishet aro/aces have it just as bad or worse than trans woman. They are continueing to compare trans woman to actual terfs and using their new definition to do so.

At least they are trying to. And its fucking disgusting. I had to witness inclusionists use a term that means “trans (woman) exclusionary radical feminist” to say
“ace exclusionists are just like trans exclusionists!”
then “ace exclusionary came from trans exclusionists” then
“ace exclusionism is terf rhetoric” and finally to
“ace exclusionists are terms”.

We fucking see what you are doing.

Terf is not a slang word for you to use lightly against people you disagree with.

Terf does not mean just “exclusionary”. Terfs specifically target trans people. Twerfs specifically target trans women with the belief that trans women are not real women. Terfs specifically exclude trans women from spaces they need to survive.

Terf rhetoric has actually caused deaths, terfs have been harming trans women from the beginning and you want to use that to scare people into believing in phobia?

There is no fucking correlation between cishet exclusionary and trans women exclusionary you transmisogynistic a holes.

Nathan "Leucosticte" Larson #fundie incel.life

If you serve on a jury, vote to acquit "rapists" of unmarried girls

If a man rapes a virgin, she is then ruined for marriage unless it is that same rapist who marries her. Therefore, instead of imprisonment for him, there should be a shotgun wedding between the two of them, so that he can be forced to provide for her, and so that she can be forced to continue having sex with him, thereby forming the basis for a stable home. In this way, there is justice, because proportionate force is being applied to both of them. Yet there is also still a healthy degree of male dominance, because he still gets to fuck her whenever he pleases.

In this way, incels have a chance at pussy. You would have no reason to want to rape a virgin unless her father refused to give her to you, maybe because she pleaded with him, "I don't want him; he's so repulsive." But if you were strong and clever enough to find a way to rape her anyway, then you deserve her pussy not just when you initially rape her, but for the rest of her life. And if she left herself vulnerable to being raped by you, then chances are, the reason she told her dad "I don't want him" was that she didn't want to be given to you voluntarily; she wanted you to take her by force because that would make for a more exciting love story to tell her friends, and it would turn her on more.

So don't get in the way of love. Vote to acquit even the rapists of virginal girls who were saving themselves for marriage, because guess what, that rapist turned out to be the one she was saving herself for. He had the gumption to take that matter into his own hands and make it happen. What could be more romantic that wanting her so badly that he would diligently stalk her and ultimately force himself upon her? That's so sweet of him, and takes way more effort, and is way sexier, than, say, a surprise proposal at a ball game.

On the other hand, if a girl is feral and hanging out at men's parties and getting drunk off her ass and then gang-raped, she probably wanted it in that case too, so why send those men to prison for giving her what she wanted? Gang-raping a girl together is a classic male bonding activity, and we should be encouraging this form of brotherhood in which they all join together in experiencing the holy rite of baptism by pussy.

Here is a guide to serving on juries and keeping defendants from getting convicted.

Alia_Harkonnen #sexist reddit.com

Female Personality Evolution

Despite most of them being fuckable, women have to compete too. Every woman wants to not be like other women but her ability to climb up the ranks of uniqueness depends on many factors, such as her intelligence, looks, environment, inborn personality, creativity, and more. This list is quite simplified but it helps define female evolution from its simplest forms to the most complex ones.
Goal is simple and universal to all but the last type: “To maximize number of sustainable high quality orbiters and to obtain the greatest possible appreciation and commitment level from the best available Chad.”
LEVEL 1: Basic Stacy
Life revolves around being validated on social media, make up, identifying with Beyonce's songs, and Chads cock. When eventually too old for Chad to keep on fucking, she sells herself to the highest bidder, has kids, gets fatter, dies.* Chad of Choice: Justin Bieber
*keep in mind, if attractive enough, she doesn’t have to compete with anyone below level 8. Especially in Gym Stacy version, which is Basic Stacy attending gym.
LEVEL 2: Basic Stacy Deluxe
Same exact script but with some thought put into rationalizing and romanticizing it to sound deeper than it is. For example, social media obsession is actually her networking or being artistic, and the top 40 songs she identifies with are ballads sang by crap female singers with great vocal range such as Adele, which in her social group counts as having a taste. Will finish college and have some type of career in something like education, and if she ends up purposely unemployed with kids, she'll base her decision on research. She likes Chad because of his confidence and personality and when she gets pumped and dumped she'll actually overcome an abusive relationship. Chad of Choice: Christian Grey
LEVEL 3: Good Girl
Average in every single way, and less attractive than her Stacy friends without actually being ugly, she usually went unnoticed. She appeals to men by being decent and stable, which is what many look for especially in comparison to her friends who can get sponsorships just for fucking around. Often from religious or at the very least overprotective families. She doesn’t drink, doesn’t do drugs, doesn’t sleep around, is average in school, wants to marry and be a mom, and soon enough when removed from school setting where she’s surrounded by more flashy girls, she finds men who are very happy with this offer. What these husbands to be don’t understand is that they bore her to tears, that she dreams of the same Chads who fuck her best friend she’s living vicariously through, and that the only reason she isn’t living it up is fear. She’s a ticking time bomb that will blow up and result in an especially shocking affair, divorce, and sexual exploration (drunk orgies) later in life. Chad of Choice: Her beta boyfriend’s alpha best friend or her best friend Stacy’s Chad
LEVEL 4: Basic Tomboy
Can range from attractive to ugly, this one is just smart enough to perceive than despite all the attention, men don't really value basic Stacy and her "interests", especially once in a relationship with her. Being interesting doesn’t come naturally to her due to complete lack of original thought, so instead of copying basic Stacies from her circle, she copies basic Norman/Chad in an attempt to get an edge over other girls by being more fun and in tune with the male brain. So she passionately follows sports, denounces anything fancy and girly, wears only natural looking make up, and forces herself upon a group of male friends who accept her because she lets them fuck her. The other part of her personality focuses on desperately trying to please every stereotypical male desire that stereotypical Stacy stereotypically fails at. This one is a treat for the right kind of guys since in her endless quest to prove how non difficult she is and how much she gets the male mind, she tolerates being cheated on, makes sandwiches, embraces porn, and takes it up the ass. Chad of choice: male best friend who is alpha in her pack - this one doesn’t annoy men with celebrity crushes, and they aren’t masculine enough for her anyway
LEVEL 5: Quirky fat girl
Unattractive enough when compared to 50% of Stacies around her, and not athletically or socially talented enough to be one of the guys, this one is under the impression she developed a personality. That means putting a lot of thought into standing out. Usually this is achieved through elaborate and irritating fashion choices such as wearing something from the 50ies or making a certain colored lipstick her thing. She also reads. Young adult fiction, of course. Thinks she's a bit of a geek cause she talks to her more nerdy male friends about Harry Potter and acts like she too has a crush on Emma Watson. Attempts humor a lot, think Amy Schumer. Men actually can't stand her but is a relatively easy fuck during her younger days which leads to resentment and turning to popular feminism later in life. Then she becomes a typical twox/askfemales poster explaining how women wear make up for themselves and how objectified she felt that one time when a drunk guy catcalled her although/because she knows he was actually addressing her friend. Has an office job and cats. Chad of Choice: supporting vampire character from Twilight whose fantasy gay relationships she writes fanfictions about (she knows the saga sucks but it’s her “guilty pleasure”)
LEVEL 6: Tomboy Deluxe (also known as The Gamer Girl)
Good looking and a bit smarter than the average tomboy, she doesn’t have to sell herself short to get an edge over basic Stacy. Claims to get along better with men but makes sure to look cute during. She wants her beta orbiters to really worship her and finds she can get more adoration from the romantic “nerdy” crowd. There she can also find Chads with better earning potential and more willingness to commit than when fishing among average jocks. Since she perfected the formula of mixing universally popular geeky interests (as long as they don’t require too much effort getting into) and cleavage, her ego is over the roof. This also makes her get bored of most men (never the attention though) which makes her sadistic until the right Chad comes along and makes her his bdsm bitch. Chad of Choice: The Joker
LEVEL 7: The Intellectual
Smarter than Gamer Girl, this one is actually able to read a book that isn’t young adult fiction and watch a three hour long black and white European movie where everyone smokes and feels unhappy. She gets some form of personal pleasure from it although mostly just because she knows she’s one of the rare ones who get it. Got into a decent college and will never miss the chance to mention her degrees, including during online arguments. Normally tries to get at least a few of those because being a college student is important to her identity. Is a more advanced level feminist, environmentally and politically aware, liberal, likes to think she’s cynical but is really just sarcastic when applicable. Worked hard to obtain resting bitch face and to appear as disinterested with everything as possible, including sex. Has few friends with benefits among her philosophy student male friends who validate her as a fascinating, smart and witty individual she’s not. Once they turn exclusive men tend to develop deep loathing for her, which is fine because she loathes them back. Chad of Choice: Her philosophy or English literature professor, at least until they finally have sex
LEVEL 8: Manic Pixie Dream Girl
Very beautiful face that always made men idolize her over slutty big tittied Stacies. Never really felt overly pressured to compete with women in her surrounding because men always fell in love with her whenever she smiled at them. Isn’t completely dumb but her energy is mainly focused on unproductive self analysis because everyone convinced her she's fascinating. What she needs validated is that this is really true, because on some level she knows that she is actually pretty boring. Her challenge is picking the right Chad worth settling for, and in the process she breaks many men’s hearts and egos. She doesn’t really know what to focus on and doesn’t like to feel like a bad person, so she deals with her hypergamy by creating a very flaky, inconsistent personality that mirrors adored and special types of women in popular culture. Often turns to drugs out of boredom but without seriously committing to them either, and develops existential depression every time she gets too settled into anything, because she is never sure if she’s missing out on something better. She looks for artistic talent Chads to provide what she herself can’t in her hopeless, exhausting attempts to be creative. Her taste in art boils down to her appreciating whatever is pretentious enough to make her think she doesn't get it. Chad of Choice: Lead singers from hipster bands such as Arctic Monkeys
LEVEL 9: The Unicorn
Had at least one big trauma or unhappy childhood which fucked her up, combined with receiving extreme adoration from men later in life. This created a fun mix of insecurity and ego, and a few mental disorders. She is usually a very sexually conflicted asexual. She has a good ability to at least subconsciously read people and she adapts her personality to mirror the fantasies of the men she is talking to. This is because she is always looking to be everyone’s everything. Her introductions are great, after which she enters a depressive phase and then goes into total destruction mode. Because she wants to leave a lasting impact without restricting herself to one person or one life, she does it by leaving scars so that they think of her even in her absence. She can’t fall in love with individual men, and is mainly solipsistic. Thinks of herself as completely emotionally empty and most likely is an addict, but can keep on bouncing back for a while due to everyone in the world wanting to support her. Chad of Choice: N/A
Level 10: Level 9 that manages to murder you and through it become the most significant person in your life while also being free of you and able to play the same crucial role in other people's lives. Role only reserved for a small percentage of female psychopaths, but if you're searching for one, places like this is where you find them so don't stop believing....

Lt. Col. Jonathan C. Dowty #ableism #fundie dailykos.com

Excerpt from an article on DailyKos about this guy

The “Christian Fighter Pilot” is Air Force Lt. Col. Dowty, a former fighter pilot turned paper pusher after being rejected for a position as an instructor at the Air Force Academy. The organization that I work for, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) has been aware of Lt. Col. Dowty and his blog for many years, mainly because MRFF and its president Mikey Weinstein are the favorite subject of Dowty’s so-called “ministry.” As of 2012, when I wrote the piece mentioned in the first paragraph, Dowty had written an astounding 432 posts tagged with either MRFF or Weinstein’s name. That was the number as of seven years ago, and Dowty has continued his diatribes against MRFF ever since, sometimes with multiple posts in the same week, bringing his tally of posts about MRFF to well over 1,000.

Dowty has a long track record of virulent homophobic, misogynistic, and Islamophobic posts, and also attacks Christians who aren’t the “right kind” of Christians in his mind. He also has no qualms about disrespecting superior officers, such as publicly accusing the first lesbian commandant of the Air Force Academy of being a liar, and cyber-stalking MRFF’s junior enlisted clients.

MRFF has attempted to get the Air Force to take some sort of action regarding Dowty and his very un-officer-like writings, even filing an Inspector General complaint, but to no avail. He continues to publish his vile screeds with impunity. In the thirteen years since he started his “ministry” blog, he has only had to remove one post — a post equating homosexuality to bestiality.

But, of all the reprehensible trash that has spewed forth from this fine “Christian” officer’s keyboard, his post yesterday, going after the pilot with ALS, is without doubt the most revolting. In this post, titled “How an Air Force Fighter Pilot Faces His Approaching Death. How Would You?,” after quoting from an Air Force article about the pilot, whose attitude would to most people be inspirational, Dowty wrote:

“Naturally, when we talk about someone’s death — especially that of a terminal illness — we speak of mortality, legacy, and perspective. Christians also speak of their faith. As appears evident from the interviews above, Christ is not a part of Holloway’s life. The only direct non-theistic detail publicly available was the fact their post-courthouse wedding ceremony was explicitly ‘non-religious.’ Otherwise, if you can communicate your deepest thoughts on your coming death and not once mention even spirituality, it’s probably a safe bet you’re not concerned with religion.

“Regrettably, that deepens the tragedy. To know that your soul will soon be required of you and to yet not be concerned of things eternal is distressing on an eternal level. Yet, there is still time.”

Just as egregiously insensitive was Dowty’s comment about the pilot’s callsign being “Twitch.” Dowty actually wrote of that:

“Left unsaid is whether the symptoms of the undiagnosed disease were the source of his callsign, ‘Twitch.’”

Bosco #fundie dreamviews.com

dreamviews is full of fucked up people man, you guys are so fucking ignorant, you aree on here to fucking prove other people wrong to make yourself feel better, get a fucking life, fuck off jackass, i simple wrote this post for people who do believe or are close to believing

ps there is a god fucking deal with it ass

pss if i get banned for this good ridden, they should really ban fucking athiest non believers like you

Some incels #sexist #racist reddit.com

Re: Imagine having a daughter

image

(testaccountplsdontig)

Lmao, imagine what the reaction would be if this bitch was from literally any other culture. Her father would fly over to wherever she's residing in, and slap the shit out of her, and everyone would cheer.

But nope; in modern times, she's a strong woymn who's standing up against the tyrant father who....raised her and wished her happy birthday.

Respect your elders. Obey EVERY word they say, their words are almost always based, regardless of what culture they are from. Stop being a fucking degenerate.

(PedophileMurderer)

LOL at last paragraph. If you're an ethnic in the West you're probably suffering because of your parents who isolated you from your culture to force you in a situation where you have to integrate with people who instinctively hate you and women who you'll never be able to build a bond with even if they find you attractive because of the extreme culture difference. Add to that other low iq parents who produce mentally ill children and raise them on shit diets on their minimum wage and welfare doing their best to guarantee inceldom. Respecting elders by default is low iq and cucked

(plamplamthrow0321)

Who cares if her dad likes Trump. I don't even follow politics, nor do I follow Trump. She's the one that's toxic. What a fucking bitch.

Everyone on both sides is brainwashed about how 'effective' trump has been as a leader. Personally i've found him to be having little or no effect on business as usual in the us, for better or worse. It's astounding how liberals all think we're living under fascism now and righties all think the day of the rope is imminent. It all just seems like everyone is making up in their mind what is happening instead of looking at what's really happened, what policies have actually passed and where the money is going. I haven't felt like the country has changed much at all compared to Obama. If anything, people have just become bigger assholes and more prone to arguing over politics in areas of life where it is completely unnecessary.

The dating realm is the biggest change now. I just can't imagine dating someone and giving a shit what their politics are without knowing anything else about them. Yet, that's what people do, they automatically discount someone based on the political compass. To me its always the dumbest and weakest people that don't want to hear opposing points of view.

The damage Trump is doing will be seen in 5-10 years. That's typically how it is with these administrations.

It's only been 3 years. Regardless, you haven't been paying attention. The EPA is an obvious example of the damage he's making.

lmao ok

you're that same cuck that was whinging about me shitting on 'the left' 3 days ago.

the whole piont is trump isn't much different than obama. the epa does fuck all anyways at this point.

(BWC_Lover)

It's possible that while she's driving to meet her "Master", she accidentally loses control of her car and is sent into a spiral by a brief clash with another car, which incidentally was being driven by her father. It's possible that she suffers from brutal lacerations, burns, and suffocation in her car, before finally being burnt alive by an unlikely explosion. It's also possible that when her father's waiting outside his (only slightly dented) car, an awesome stray German Shepherd runs to him, plays a bit, then settles on the passenger seat of his car.

(PedophileMurderer)

Why are white women so disgusting?

Because at some point in history white men became fucking idiots.

meh nordics were always like this, eg read what romans (levantines) wrote about english natives, what we're witnessing is probably just regression fuelled by comfort

(plamplamthrow0321)

She probably tied her tubes already, she enjoys whoring around too much to risk that lifestyle getting ruined by kids.

No way man, white girls having mixed kids out of wedlock is progressive now. Even if she's a single mom they will be souvenirs for her to look back on her days as daddy's slave.

She will find some guy who's betamaxxing to handle the tab, ofc, and continue whoring around. Kids don't stop whores nowadays. If anything they just keep having kids and lonely simps "man up" for them. Or the gov't. does.

google her username. she's disgusting and looks retarded. her "master" is a liberal black supremacist.

but somehow cannot seem to find his way back to africa and keep his hands off white chix.

honk honk!

(FailAllAspects)

If i ever manage to ascend or betabux or whatever, i will NEVER have kids.

The age of degeneracy is upon us. It’s in full swing and will only get worse. The US is already a degenerate hellhole and it’s spreading everywhere, even the middle-east isn’t safe anymore.

You’re going to have to sit your ass down and shut the fuck up while your children indulge in whatever depravities they wish. If you EVER voice disapproval you will be met with “Yikes sweaty, stop your ABUSIVE and MISOGYNIST meddling with her life. She’s a fully GROWN AND INDEPENDENT 13 year old, and she can do bukkakes with Chadlets if she wants. You’re so insecure! So what if she wants a dildo?”

Remember, it’s a 🤡🌎. Nothing makes sense.

(Idk12344482305)

ITcels actually defend this.

At this point, I will just spend all my money on plane tickets to speed up global warming at least a little bit.

Whites should be exterminated.

(FantasticPressure1)

Please note her username: Cascadia

This is the region including Portland and Seattle, otherwise known as the Femtopia hellscape full of homeless and incel men. There are more homeless and incel men per capita here than anywhere in the US, possibly the world.

It's the region where the famed pussy slayer Ted Bundy, the man women masturbate to biopics of, reigned. That's your competition and who the women want. No they don't want a "nice guy" but you'll have the messages "reject gender roles, resist the patriarchy, down with toxic masculinity" shoved in your face by tattooed prostitutes. Actual prostitutes. Camgirl whores with nose rings.

An endless amount of information has been posted about this region but read what this slut writes, look at her tattoos, look how she hates her dad, and then understand that's "Cascadia." Incidentally, redditors love the place and it's pretty much 110% white. How can it be over 100%? You'd understand if you ever lived there. You sometimes see well-dressd asian, indian, and white dudes walking around like zombies because they're incel.

(Archmage_Saltcel)

"Reproductive rights" AKA the left-wing's foot in the eugenics doorway. Legalize abortion federally and you'll have designer babies within at least 10-20 years. Screenings for and aborting babies for "undesirable" traits will become the norm...If not outright law. Knowing democrats the "clump of cells" argument will be made into legal precedent and eventually expanded to encompass people of any age who become a problem to the government. Short? Abort. Ugly? Abort. Poor? Abort. Question anything a woman does ever? Abort.

It's a clown world when the people who "punch Nazis" are the ones trying to make Hitler's dream world a reality. NUKES WHEN?

cultureshift #fundie tmblr.co

[User scared-in-your-room made a post reading, "post abortion cramps: do not recommend."]

Take a deep breath and let it out slowly. That feeling is life flowing through you. That is a feeling your now dead son or daughter will never know. You robbed him or her not only of your love as their mother, but of life itself. You robbed your child of the opportunity to feel the rush of air into their lungs and the warmth of the sun on their face. You took these things away because you thought your life was more valuable than theirs. You were wrong. While you continue to draw breath, your child will slowly decompose until he or she is tossed into an incinerator with other medical waste. This will forever be your legacy as a mother, no matter how many more children you let live or how many more you let die.

[An anonymous user responded, "scared-in-your-room is EIGHTEEN FUCKING YEARS OLD you damn sick bastard. How about you concenr yourself with changing te culture where she was pressured to have sex when she's still a GODDAMN CHILD HERSELF, and not with creating sick little stories that show you have zero respect for her as a person?"]

You are right, I don't have respect for her as a person. She clearly still only cares about herself and demonstrates a callous disregard for the child she destroyed. Her only concern is her own pain, she couldn't even make a few extra keystrokes to recognize the life she stole away from her once living son or daughter.

Abortion does not erase motherhood, it doesn't change the past. Abortion doesn't just make you unpregnant, it makes you the mother of a dead child.

Terra Rae #conspiracy in5d.com

Atlantis really gets people’s attention these days. It’s coming through our cellular memory now, to enable us to examine and heal our role in the downfall of what I personally believe was a magnificent continent and a highly advanced civilization. It is coming up for many reasons right now. Since Atlantis became highly advanced in technology and science, there were many people who felt that Lemuria, the incredibly beautiful, abundant civilization that was in the Pacific, was “lesser than” and backward compared to the scientifically advanced Atlantis.

We don’t have a lot of records of this large Lemuria continent, since it sank completely. We also don’t hear much about it because the “powers that were” (since I believe they are finally leaving, or being taken) have not wanted people to know what we knew then, and how we lived in harmony, grace and balance on Lemuria for ever so long. My work with clients and our “Team Earth” group explores many ancient past lives. Both Atlantis and Lemuria come up a lot these days. I believe this is because it is the same “dark hats” that took these magnificent continents down that are now still working for world domination. People are now ready to come clean in their role there. This is important, since many today hold the fear that we are going to destroy Earth again, which is coming right up from a cellular memory.

Since the Crystalline Stellar Skulls (CSS) are able to go right through the timelines as well as in and out of all dimensions, they can add even more information with our work for clients and “Team Earth” – so when we get to something destructive that was set up in one of those time frames, we are able to do great explorations with important intel as well as confirming our findings. We are also able to remove implants, curses and much more that were put in from the dark wizards in those timelines and others, that have been affecting both individuals, Gaia and the masses for eons.

The other important reason is that people lost their connection with Gaia, as well as the cycles of the Sun, Moon, Planets and Galaxy – and forgot how these cycles affect everything we do. In Lemuria, and long ago in Atlantis, people understood that everything in the Stars, Planets and Galaxy and their movement, comes around again and repeats itself, just as Lemuria did. Camelot and Avalon, were on the planet Avalon in the constellation of Lyra. The first Atlantis was on Mars, and are discussed in my book. Lemuria knew how to work with the cycles, and thus prepare and prevent disasters and bring the cycles into balance.

The dark hats, or dark side, or dark Lucifarian wizards, as I prefer to call them, decided that Lemuria was just too beautiful, abundant, harmonious and balanced. So once again they had to jump in with their deception, destruction, perversion, and the usual divide and conquer. They could then bring forth their dark wizardry to hypnotize, program, separate and of course control. They tried to convince the people of Lemuria that this way with the crystals were obsolete, since they really wanted this knowledge for themselves.

Since I have read and heard of many different timelines as to when Lemuria was created, and when it went down, I consulted the Stellar Skulls about the actual timelines of its creation and destruction, along with some of their input.

Timelines of the Creation and Destruction of Lemuria

Lemuria was its own creation of planetary beings that came from all over the Galaxy. They were like-minded beings that came to create a planet, and strive for harmonic resonance. Some came from the early planets in Lyra that were blown up. It was a bit on its own and then planets and stars came into existence around it.(This is where the first form in density started. It’s explained more in my book.) Mu as in “our” and “my” is an existence of heart-centered Light Beings and Master Creators that were their own rising and birthing. They birthed their own civilization here, much like the original Mu, and embraced it. So truth be told, Lemuria was created not from one constellation, and it created its own force field.

Sinking of Lemuria

CSS: Lemuria went down when we were unable to have complete control, and the dark wizards chose to eradicate our lovely Creation of Light. This was way before Atlantis. (I asked if any of this beautiful continent survived?)

There were indeed parts of Lemuria that stayed intact ~ yet forgotten on some level.

These pieces were able to rise up again. Some actually just floated to the top. The Lemuria islands rebuilt their communities and flourished until the final take down of Atlantis, and then the remaining pieces were taken out completely. There were no remaining pieces of Love and Light!

TR: It has been said that an earthquake and volcanoes just took it down. I feel strongly that these Luciferian wizards took down our Creation of Light. Can you tell us how they did it and when the first big take down was, that left us with a few islands?

CSS: The Pacific continent of Lemuria was first taken down prior to Atlantis, millions of years ago. It was a time that the dark wizards were looking for complete control, so alas, not just one can take full credit.

They used very advanced technology of an electromagnetic resonance, to hurl planets, asteroids and space objects, bulleted forward to our planet, aiming at Lemuria, our Creation of Light. They used anything that could obliterate and create a cosmic explosion.

TR: I believe the New Earth, or Terra Crysta, will have the balance of the technology and our connection to Gaia and how we are all so connected. We are all made of stardust, after all. (Or as astronomy legend Carl Sagan used to phrase it, “star stuff.”) Working with and understanding these cycles is what kept Lemuria in balance and thriving for a very long time. They had a huge crystal cluster computer that had all of this knowledge programmed within it. Everyone had their own crystal that could connect with the large cluster to access whatever knowledge they needed or wanted.

This is now coming up for people to pay attention to the level of technology that we are opening to. As the technology comes in, are we doing a big disconnect to Gaia once more? Technology can be fabulous when it is brought forth to serve the whole, and it is not destructive to people, the planet or the atmosphere.

Crystal Moon

Earth had a Crystal Moon in the atmosphere that held up the firmament, which was a three mile thick band of water. Crystal Moon regulated not only the temperate climate of Atlantis, but it also regulated the energy grids, right down to the atmosphere of every household. Marduk (the Anunnaki son of Enki, and grandson of Anu, past ruler of Nibiru) finally got onto Poseidon after so much convincing and promises to the priests, who were supposed to oversee this magnificent second moon.

In Atlantis, the high priests were in control of the giant crystals in the Temples. They were supposed to protect them, and keep the crystals’ amazing abilities safe. They bought into the ideas of power and control and started to manipulate the people as well. Some of the same dark hats, or dark wizards, wanted to have wars, which were not allowed. Marduk and his reptilian ways worked this idea for thousands of years, since he was one of the dark wizards that believed that Earth was his. He finally made his way to the grand Island of Poseidon where the beauty and technology were very amazing. It also held many of the giant Temple Crystals and the controls for Crystal Moon.

One of the priests actually brought Marduk up to the Crystal Moon to explore, which was really a power play. He was ready, and already had others working with him. They cut the electrical magnetic connection, which pulled Crystal Moon to Earth, where it exploded. This flipped Gaia on her axis, which created an internal flipping from the inside out, and sank Atlantis, Lemuria and Uriger, as well as the Sumerian and other civilizations. (Skulls said this actually flipped Earth back and forth on Her axis.) I have heard people say, “The destruction of Atlantis was in Divine Order.” I brought this up to Metatron, since it really bothered me, and he loudly and firmly stated that, “Divine Order is Divine Order – there was nothing Divine about the sinking of Atlantis and Lemuria!” He stated this with such force, I believe the heavens shook for a bit.

So-called Gods

This massive event wiped out millions of people and animals. Thirty-three species of mammals went extinct in North America alone. It was also when the frequency on Earth and in the people dropped from upper fourth and fifth dimensions to lower-octave 3D. We hadn’t been in 3D before. People lost their knowledge of the stars. In Lemuria, people knew we were all one, and all connected. Not only was this connection to each other lost, but people lost connection to Source and All that Is. The so-called Gods, who had become very dark, now became very powerful and even more controlling. They claimed to be Gods, since they could now control what was left of humanity and continue this control right up until now. People ever since, have been warring and fighting each other, with help from the Gods, and “in the name of God.” These dark Gods and their dark followers, live off of the louche. This is the fear, horror, terror, fighting and all of the emotions that come up with these, that the dark hats feed off of, since it sustains them. As you look around Earth, you can see that this is how it has been for a very long time.

CSS: Actually, for around 13,375 years, when Atlantis and Lemuria went down.

Metatron (through Crysta): It is always longer what has been perceived to be the case. This figure is closer to the actual time frame.

TR: As people move into their hearts, and the Heart of Gaia, they are raising their frequencies. This means that every cell is vibrating faster. This brings expansion and openings into the higher dimensions – once again. It also brings up what needs to be cleared in the emotional body, which is essential for Ascension. People also lost their connection to Gaia Herself. I rarely see people connecting to the Heart of Gaia. Doing this is crucial now – since She will ground, protect, energize and calm both our physical and our Light Bodies. To relax you even more, know that the Galactic Federation of Light is on duty at all times to stop or redirect the asteroids, comets and star materiel that moves in Earth’s direction.

Grounding to the Heart of Gaia

Here’s an easy and quick way to do this for yourself. Close your eyes, breathe in a Magenta Ray into your heart with three deep breaths. Now, shoot your heart-light right down through your body and out of your feet, to the very lively Heart of Gaia.

With three more deep breaths, bring another ray from Her heart – right up through your feet to fill your own heart. Feel how delicious this is – and wonderfully grounding. It also will center and strengthen you as well. Do it a lot, and be sure to thank and acknowledge Gaia. She feels this connection. This includes talking to Her as well. Don’t be surprised if a wind, a cloud, a bird or critter shows up just then, since she can hear you and feel you.

sliske , blackblade,puck #fundie mmo-champion.com


Judge grants convicted pedophile ex-husband sole custody of his daughter

Feel free to question why this Judge is still in the job
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti....html#comments
http://kfor.com/2013/06/25/convicted...-old-daughter/
http://www.klewtv.com/news/national/...?tab=video&c=y

Ms Coomer pointed out that because Elizondo is a registered sex offender, he will be unable to carry out many parental duties
'He can`t take her to Chuck E. Cheese. He can`t take her to a park,' she said. 'He can`t go to her school. He`s not allowed in school.'

The thought of this child being stuck in the house with him is truly frightening. But it does beg the question how bad is the mother?? the article sort of eludes to the reason why the judge awarded the father sole custody but their HAS TO BE more to the story.to the reason why the judge awarded the father sole custody but their HAS TO BE more to the story.

(sliske)

Well if you look at it logically then any gay brother you have or even any straight sister mum or dad could be frightening too. I'm a straight guy who likes older women, i don't think my mum feels in danger of me suddenly raping her or even hinting that i fancy her for multiple reasons

1. I don't
2. Pedophile / Bisexual / Homosexual / Whateversexual doesn't equal automatic incest condoning.

Not to be a pedophile sympathizer but at the end of the day they're just people who are attracted to a certain thing purely because of the way their body developed. They shouldn't be treated as incestious just for that reason alone.

Edit: of course if you do the actual act of having sex with a minor its still a pretty horrible thing, but being a pedophile in itself shouldn't automatically make you a lesser human being in regards to your children.

There's a pretty big difference there. He was convicted of molesting a 6 year old, he specifically targeted a helpless victim. If your gay brother was raping men, you bet your ass you'd be afraid of him.

I wouldn't. I don't assume rapist = incest condoning
What i'm saying is just because he molested someone, doesn't mean his standards are completely gone. For example i rape Cheryl Cole, that doesn't mean i'm going to go and rape an old man too.
And I think it's a far cry more likely that a person who molests a child is likely to do so again even if the child is related to them.

I wasn't wieghing it i was just using it as an example in itself. But thats not the point. The guy on the previous page said it better than i could. I'm terrible at explaining my point. In a nut shell i don't believe that being a child molester makes you have no bounderies. I believe even a rapist has standards or even a child molester has standards. I don't believe he would do that to his family


(blackblade)
Even criminals have rights, people.

Yeah, he's done some terrible shit. That doesn't give you the right to shit on him, nor deny him his family. If he was dangerous, he'd still be in jail.

This is simply a trick by the media to generate hits. Unless he's had a history of molesting his own children, it's a non-issue.

(puck)
I don't see the problem. Pedophile does not mean he would be prone to a relationship with his own daughter

Jessica Fowler & Amber Harrell #fundie pinknews.co.uk

Two cis women arrested for groping trans woman

Police in North Carolina have arrested two women accused of sexually assaulting a trans woman in bathroom bar.

The two cisgender—meaning they identify with the gender assigned at birth—individuals, identified as 31-year-old Jessica Fowler and 38-year-old Amber Harrell, were both charged with second-degree kidnapping and sexual battery.
?

Harrell was previously arrested for assault in March. She turned herself in over the weekend but was released on Monday (January 7) after posting a $50,000 bail.

Fowler turned herself in on Tuesday (January 8) and was placed in detention at the Wake County jail under a $30,000 bond, according to local news outlet The News & Observer.

North Carolina has been a focus point for clashes over transgender rights. A controversial measure forcing people to use facilities matching their birth certificate was finally rescinded last year.

The alleged incident took place inside the women’s bathroom of Raleigh’s Milk Bar on December 9, Raleigh Police told PinkNews.

The police also released a 911 call dated December 10, in which the unidentified caller seeks to make a report about what happened. (Voices have been modified to disguise the caller’s natural voice.)

The caller said the victim had gone to the bathroom to check in on her make up.

The two cis women appeared drunk and at first questioned the trans woman about her genitalia before becoming more physical.

“She pulls her shirt up and says, ‘Do you want to see my boobs?’ and she pressed [the victim] up against the wall with her bare chest,” the called said, describing the assault in the bathroom.

According to the arrest warrant, quoted by ABC 11, the cis women also touched the trans woman’s “buttocks and chest.”

The assault then continued outside the bathroom and at the bar, where the bartender could also witness how uncomfortable the trans woman was getting.

The caller can be heard saying: “She asked the girls two times to stop. The girl didn’t stop at first, so she forcefully had to tell the girl to stop—she was like groping [the victim’s] back, [the victim’s] stomach, it was uncomfortable.”

The caller also said that the victim suffered a panic attack as a result of the assault.

PinkNews contacted the company that owns Milk Bar, Bunch of Five Hospitality Co., for comment.

The company gave a statement to local news outlet Wral.com, saying they are cooperating with the police investigation.

The statement read: “Bunch of 5s handles all matters that threaten our patrons in a timely fashion to ensure their safety and ability to enjoy themselves at all of our locations.”

“This matter was handled with cooperation and full transparency with the Raleigh Police Department and the detective that was assigned this case. Bunch of 5s and Milk Bar seek to continue to welcome all patrons into a safe environment,” the statement said.

PhyllisCassell #fundie npr.org

Just one other reason to pull your kids out of the public school system. Sure, there are still some decent ones left in few areas, but most are liberal cesspools. Because liberals don't believe that you deserve the tax money you pay in to educate your child, they don't want you to have a voucher to educate your child in a safe place with good teachers. If you can afford it, pull your child out and find an alternate way for them to be educated. Liberals will leave the poor in failing schools with no way to get out, but it's time for the failing schools to go away. With the federal Department of Education leadership that is full of liberals, the USA is now #34 in the world in education, even though we spend more than most other countries. The money is obviously not getting to the children - more likely to the massive numbers of "administrators" that government has to employ. There are already lawsuits by transgenders against schools about this. A "girl" who still has male genitalia in Iowa doesn't like it that the school makes him/her shower behind a curtain after gym class. He wants to be treated just like the other girls, none of whom have male genitalia. This is a liberal's world of chaos. Why not separate bathrooms for Christians, Jews, Republicans, Democrats, whites, blacks, gays, transgenders, - I'm sure that liberals will come up with some other gender before it's all over with.

Buster Himen #fundie erasingus.com

Know Your Enemy: The 5 Types of White Liberal Men

There are a few types of liberal White males that exist and today we're going to cover five of them. They are creepy, they are emotional, they are illogical and they all play an important role in erasing us.

The most integral part of the struggle for White survival is for you to understand who your enemy is and then study them; know them like the back side of your hand. Understand the way they think to make yourself a more formidable debater. Understand how to exploit the loopholes, double-standards, and fallacy in their emotional pleas to erase the White race from planet earth.

Now here we are, the five types of White liberal men.

1. The Blue Pill Beta Male.

These are the kinds of men who you find identifying as feminists because they think it'll get them laid. Little do they know women really aspire to be with an Alpha male. Perhaps that is why the majority of feminists have rape fantasies to the point they invent terms like "rape culture." Nonetheless, these men typically surround themselves with social justice warrior White females with multicolored hair, nose piercings and oversized eyeglasses and kowtow to their social outrage causes.

2. The White Husband Who Gets Off Watching His Wife Bang Black Guys.

These types of White liberals are particularly gross. The problem they have is more or less rooted in a serious psychological disease that stems from an addiction to hardcore pornography. They need to find something more and more taboo and the only thing they can eventually achieve satisfaction on is by abusing themselves by handing their wives, and sometimes daughters, off to Black men. They also have an inherent inferiority complex. They buy into the Jewish poison that White men are inferior sexual providers to their women as propagated in the Jewish media commercials, television shows, movies and music. A part of this, particularly among the younger generation of White communists is as some sort of penance for the since of their "racist ancestors." Seriously, there is a whole corner of the internet dedicated to this filth. They aren't open about their hatred for White people but you can bet they were amongst the first to line up to vote for Barack Obama, twice.

3. The Academic White Communist.

Under any other circumstances like not having wealthy parents, they would have become a gutter rat ANTIFA activist. But their parents who have worked hard their entire lives to accumulate a savings account and send their kids to university end up with a child who get indoctrinated in "gender studies" and "white privilege" sociology classes. They buy the malarky of their Jewish communist professors who are burnouts from the 1960s hippie movement. Bring it all down, man. They use words and phrases like "structural racism" and "white privilege" and express particular concern about "rape culture." He may even go so far as to post pictures to his Tumblr and Twitter accounts of himself holding up sharpie markered signs saying "this is what a feminist looks like" or notes about his "White skin privilege." What these people do is regurgitate the kind of far-left nonsense that their professors teach them. They live so well, their life is so great, they have so many opportunities that they need to find something wrong with the world and adhere to neo-Marxist nonsense.

4. The Union Worker.

I'm having a hard time with this one simply because it is tough to consider drywall hangers, carpenters, painters, plumbers and other craftsmen as "liberal" by the 2015 standard. Your average unionized contractor more than likely does not want his daughter marrying Tyrone and certainly does not buy into the "White Privilege" bullshit but for all intents and purposes he is as dangerous to the future of the White race as number's 1-3 on our list and I'll tell you why. The union worker primarily votes Democrat and by default liberal for purely economic reasons. Whether you realize it or not, the "union thug" who votes blue to save his pension and platinum health benefits and 6 weeks of vacation is almost as harmful to White society as the ghetto waste in the Section 8 housing development who is eating McDonalds, smoking Newports and drinking Miller High Life on your dime. Would you believe these two people are voting alongside these people? The sheer greed of many White males to vote such a way to preserve their own arbitrary wealth has been and continues to be devastating and will ultimately be what gets Hilary Clinton elected in 2016. Sure, voting Republican would send his son to fight Israel's wars but holy cow, you can thank this type of White liberal for Barack Obama.

5. The One Who Is Starting to Get It.

There comes a time when every man has to take a long, hard look in the mirror and answer to himself. There is undoubtedly a contingent of well-intentioned White male liberals who realize that no matter how much Social Justice Warrioring around they do they will still be considered the ultimate scum of society. All of the men on this list, perhaps with the exception of number two who is who he is because of childhood abuse and perverted pornography addiction, will in due time realize that they just aren't welcomed and certainly aren't needed anymore. The feminists truly hate men so they no longer need the pity points since enough of the idiots in America believe in farces like "rape culture" and "gender inequality." The campus chapter of the Black Panthers and Muslim Brotherhood will capitalize on the emotionality of White women and no longer need White men to kiss their ass. The mass expanding non-White population in America will be enough to get Democrats elected and the pensions of union workers will be unfunded liabilities and the first thing to go when the shit hits the fan.

You can bet your bottom dollar that a ton of White liberal males of all ages in all corners of the United States are starting to take long and hard look at the lunacy of the world around them. They're evaluating all of the time they have wasted being a Social Justice Warrior and eventually take that step toward being a conservative with a brain instead of a conservative with no heart.

thedevilsrejector #fundie youtube.com

(Yay! An agnostic fundie!!)

Atheist huh?
Well fuck, there just is no god. Its fuckin set in stone there is no gods or fuckin nothing we just live. Because you know.
Myself, im agnostic. There are WAY too many relegions to look into to WRITE THEM ALL OFF AND JOIN ONE THAT DOES JUST THAT. I hope you get stopped on the street asked what religion are you and you say athiest so they can ask you (Oh so what do you think about "insert silly religion here") so you can stutter and say i have never heard of that. Fuck athiests you guuys are almost as worse as stupid ass christians. Fuck athiests fuck everything there is no way of knowing anything.