Similar posts

afdave1 #fundie richarddawkins.net

Some have objected to the creationist assertion that "2 miles of sediment could not be laid down by 1 mile of water." Oh really? How about you try a little experiment as I did this morning. Take two glasses and put 1" of water in one and 2" of sand in the other. Now pour the water into the sand, cover the mixture with your hand and shake (simulating the violent conditions of floodwaters), then let the sediment settle. You will now have about 2" of sand and about 1/4" of clear water above the sand. I tried this experiment this morning and it works great.

Moral of the story: 1 mile of water can indeed deposit 2 miles of sediment ... and it most likely did just that in the Great Flood of Noah.

One more thing. There was more than 1 mile of water available. The average ocean depth today is 12,200 feet covering 3/4 of the earth's surface. If the available water was spread over the whole earth, this would equate to over 1.7 miles deep. So we don't just have 1 mile of water ... we've got more than a mile and a half of water to work with.

Marc D. Carpenter #fundie outsidethecamp.org

[All italics and underlining original]

During the course of a sermon, a "pastor" (loosely-termed) came to 1 Timothy 2:9-10 and read it in the KJV: "In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; but (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works."

Instead of exegeting the passage, this pastor said, "I'm not going to touch this one with a ten-foot pole." This is a true story; I heard him say it on tape.

Why did this "pastor" abrogate his "pastoral duty" when it came to the modesty of women? To anyone who saw how the women were dressed in his assembly, the answer is obvious: This "pastor" was afraid to get into specifics as to what constituted modest dress, because if he did so, he would face the wrath of the shamelessly immodest women of the assembly and would be called a "fundamentalist" or a "legalist."

Yet passages on the modesty and immodesty of women are found throughout the Bible. If God put them in the Bible, we had better not ignore them.

Why does the Bible focus on women rather than men when it comes to modesty of dress? As Solomon said, "That which has been, it [is] that which shall be. And that which has been done, it [is] that which will be done. And there is no new [thing] under the sun" (Ecclesiastes 1:9). As it is today, so it always has been: the women of the world love the glitter and glamor. They love to behave and to dress in such a way as to be sexy and seductive. The men of the world love it and feed into it. It is a truly disgusting dance of whoredom.

Whorish dress has not stayed outside of the professing church. In most cases, the women in the professing church and the world look no different. Their "everyday" clothes are whorish, their "dress-up" clothes are whorish, and their "recreation" clothes are whorish.

But this is not how true Christian women are to dress or conduct themselves. They are to adorn (arrange) themselves in modest, proper clothing, with shamefacedness and sobriety.

[...]

Why are most women's clothes made the way they are? What do most fashion designers have in mind when they design clothes for women? All you have to do is listen to a women's fashion clothing designer talk about why he or she designed clothing a certain way. The fashionable clothing is designed to be purposefully sexual. Almost all the clothes in the women's clothing departments and stores are designed to make the woman sexually attractive.

There is no denying this fact. Look at the difference between men's and women's clothing. Why is there a much higher prevalence of low-cut blouses, shirts, and dresses among women's clothing than among men's clothing? Why are so many v-necks or scoop-necks in women's clothing? Why do many women's fashions try to bare something, whether it be a part of the back or the front or the leg or even the shoulder? You cannot get around the fact that these things are designed the way they are because the designers have wicked things in mind. Whenever my wife and I go shopping with our children for clothes for the females in our house (one woman and two girls), we get angry. It is disgusting to see that stores (even K-Mart, Wal-Mart, Sears, etc.) expect all girls and women, including my daughters and my wife, to dress like whores. Take something as benign as shirts. In the stores, there are separate sections for girls' shirts, boys' shirts, women's shirts, and men's shirts. One would expect, if there were no other motive than to clothe people, that the girls' shirts would be designed the same as the boys' shirts, and the men's shirts would be designed the same as the women's shirts, maybe with some color differences. But no - they are noticeably different. The first thing one notices is that the hole for the head is noticeably bigger for the female shirts. Why would this be? Is it because females' heads are bigger than males' heads? Of course not. Upon closer inspection, the hole is actually shaped differently as well as being bigger. What is it for? It is for the neckline to be lower on the females' tops! When one looks at button-down tops, most of the females' tops do not button as high as the males' tops. In addition, shirts for females are shorter than the shirts for males.

[...]

Little girls of the world learn that femininity means whorishness at a very young age. The dolls they play with have whorish clothing. The animated Disney movies they see always have the main female character dressed in whorish clothing (usually something strapless). It is all around.

[...]

Finally, there is the swimsuit. It is nothing more than underwear worn in public. Why is it that women would be ashamed to be seen in a bikini walking down the sidewalk in a city, but it all of a sudden becomes acceptable when there is sand and water? Do the standards of modesty change when one comes upon sand and water? These are the same women who would be very upset if someone walked in on them in their bedroom when they were only clothed in their underwear, but when there is sand and water around, the shame is gone. The hypocrisy is evident. Can a woman wearing a modern swimsuit in public ever say that she is obeying 1 Timothy 2:9? And how many women in a beauty pageant would qualify for shamefacedness? It should be obvious that beauty pageants of any sort, whether or not there are swimsuits, are wicked.

Christian women and girls - be modest, be proper, be discreet, be decent, be shamefaced!

Tom Knight #fundie youtube.com

ItsAmandaWan: I'm not a sinner Tom. Thanks, have a great day!?

Tom Knight: Amanda, I was a bit busy the other night so I couldn't write much, but I appreciate your kind reply. What I share with people I share in love, but I usually receive hate in return. That's OK, I don't take it personally. I'm only the messenger. Anyway, as the Bible says in Psalm 51 that we were all born into sin. So we all have a sin nature. Satan loves to deceive people and put a different color wrapping on sin, and it works especially well when society applauds any kind of sin. We have to ask for God's help out of sin every day. And repent when we do sin. I never realized the urgency of accepting Christ as Lord and Savior until I looked people in the eyes who had NDE's. You can tell that what they experienced in Hell was not a bad dream or a hallucination, it forever changed their lives. For someone to say that what they experienced there they wouldn't wish on their worst enemy, or even Hitler. It must have been traumatic. So I share this truth with precious people. What they do with it is their decision. Even most churches today don't talk about sin because people don't want to hear about it. And less money will come in if they do tell people about their sin. But the only way to escape the fires of Hell is to repent and accept Jesus as Lord and Savior. I pray you can do that.
Anyway, darling, I have to go now. My sexy Asian wife is out in SF, she's a highly-payed Medical Professional and I'm here in Pensacola Beach Florida (with the sugary white sand beaches) getting some beach properties. So I'll see her soon. But she's amazing, she honored her father's request to not get involved with any men until after Med School. So at 27 she was still a virgin, so I won the bank! As an Ex Playboy Military Pilot/ Airline Pilot I did well my dear! But God honored me when I made my decision for Christ as Lord and Savior. We waited and honored the No Wed/ No Bed plan of God. So our first time was honeymoon night. But she's is a Lady of dignity and self-respect and not a dog in heat looking to scratch an itch or satisfy an "urge!" And my gosh did it pay off! Big time! Anyway love, please consider accepting Christ as Lord and Savior of your life! He is the only way to escape the fires of Hell. I see the emptiness in your eyes. God knows you are truly searching. Please don't live in the gutter of Satan having any sex before marriage. And the bisexual mess will definitely lead you to the fires of Hell, so get that out of your life quick and wait for God's man for life so you don't spend an eternity in regret.
You don't have to write back my love, only think of what I've said to you because it's said in love to you, and not hate or judgment.
Anyway, have a good night my sweetheart and live a Godly life!
Tommy boy!?

Robert Lyte #fundie robertlyte.blogspot.com

I See young people, they are more interested in having chat times with all their young friends than they are to actually following Jesus. They are too busy being silly with each other than they are to be following Jesus. They are not serious. They are just following the world. They love the world and all the wonderful sins of youth which are passing anyway and fading away very quickly. Dear friends, we cannot be like this. We have to have ourselves absolutely and completely separate all the time from those silly paths. Young people have to be separate. No time to just hang around with your friends and be stupid together. It is time to separate ourselves to the Lord and become his follower where we actually do walk the narrow way like the disciples did.

The foolishness of youth isn't worth missing out on the eternal kingdom of God. We can put aside the foolishness of youth so we can enter the kingdom. We cannot enter the kingdom while we are just laughing at the jokes the world laughs at. While watching the same TV the world loves. While we are following the sports the world chases after. One champion rises, another one falls. One is winning, another one is losing, it doesn't matter, it's world. Why do we care about those things? We are here for the kingdom of God not for these worldly things. Many Christians adamantly come against me if I say these things. It is because their hearts are dark and they're loving the world, and they don't want to turn away Sent from my iPhone

I can do it, so can you. While people just follow their foolish youthful ways, there is no way they're going to be able to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. What's the point of just having all your cars, and having all your fun, and talking on all your mobile phones, and having good times with all your friends everywhere, when you just simply don't follow Jesus? This world is completely deceptive. If you live in Babylon like the big Babylon cities of this world, like New York, or any of these big cities, you're going to be amongst all this rife, foolish, worldly paths like Lot was. It will be very hard for you to enter the kingdom if you are following them. So we got to be separate.

We got to be separate from all this whole system of sports and attainment, parties, and worldly chasing, and being your 'best person now.' Thrill seekers say to live life to the fullest. Some die trying. Some of them say to live life to the fullest or die trying. Some do die trying and somebody says at least they died doing something they love doing. Fool! They ended up in hell. In hell they are crying out, “Please warn my family that living a foolish life like that ends in hell!” Like the rich man did, and Abraham answered the rich man saying, “Son, they have the prophets in the Bible to listen to,” Moses and Elijah, about hell and Jesus. “If they can't listen to them, they won't even listen to anybody sent back from the dead.”That is what Abraham was saying. And the rich man in hell was crying out in torment saying, “Please, please, please warn my people.” They didn't know that a thrill-seeking life just ended in hell so suddenly. So on earth the people are saying, “He died doing something he loved doing,” and all are happy about it because they are so deceived. And then under the earth in hell that very same person is crying out in torment now, his chances are over. No more salvation for him. He can't be saved, finished. Done. His foolish life ended in smoke. 

You know, there is a verse in the Bible that says that the folly of the fool is destruction. Fools folly is destruction. You live a life of foolishness with the foolish youth of this generation, your folly will be destruction. That's what it comes down to. You go join them, you will join them in hell too. Who are we going to join?Are we going to join them and end up in the same fire that they are headed to? Or are we going to walk the narrow way and be separate away from the ways of this generation! Christians are so busy being on the broad path and being blinded by this world and by satan, that when they hear these truths they cannot accept it.

They say, “I can watch my baseball, I can watch the footy, I can go and join in on soccer there is not sin in that.” But that's because they're following the Broad way and everybody's on the Broadway to destruction. 

Jesus said, “Broad is the way that leads to destruction and many are those who go by that way, and narrow is the way that leads to life and few go that way.” It is because few will decide to do the words of Jesus. And what did he say? He said, “Deny yourself, pick up your cross, and follow me.”Jesus even said if anybody loves his life on this earth he will lose it, but if anybody loses his life for my sake he will find it. Do you hate your life for the sake of the kingdom? or do you love your life?What is it with you today? 

Most Christians love their life too much. They love their footy. They love their soccer. They love their baseball and love the Super Bowl. They love all these sports.They want to turn the TV on and want to love all the ungodliness that this generation talks about and say it is not sin. Well, guess what dear friend, it is sin, because it's on the broad path of destruction. And you also, if you follow them, are on the tide with the world to hell directly, Christian or not. And that's where they want to believe all the deceived preachers who say, “It is all find, you are saved brother, because you believe in Jesus.” And then they end up in hell just like the rich man.And who's going to be laughing then? the devil or you? The devil will laugh at you. That is why we have to be completely separate and not be deceived. Instead of mocking the preacher who tells you to leave your sports and all your ways of the world, you should be accepting what he says and believing that these words Jesus said are true: “If you love your life you'll lose it, but if you hate your life for my sake you'll find it.” They are true. 

Just supposing those other words are true as well where Jesus said,“If you love your life on this earth you will lose it, but if you hate your life for my sake you will gain it.” Just supposing Jesus is speaking the truth when he says in Matthew: “If anybody wants to follow me, he must pick up his cross, deny himself and follow me.”

Just supposing that's true! Just supposing the words of Jesus are true where he says: “The person who hears my words and doesn't do them is likened unto the man who built his house on the sand, and the winds come and the flood comes and the destruction of that house is great.”Just supposing the words of Jesus are true where he says, “The man who does my words when he hears them, he does put them into practice, he shall be the one who built his house on the rock and his house shall not be destroyed.” 

Divinia Water #quack #mammon diviniawater.com

<Idaho Springs (probably treated tap) water treated and sold by a family owned water startup>
DIVINIA Water is the result of our proprietary purification technique that delicately removes the effects of man.

The result is balanced, deuterium depleted, cellular EZ/plasma water.

We like to call it renatured water.

​DIVINIA is revolutionary because our exclusive Eco-friendly approach brings water back to its original, unadulterated form. Furthermore, we bottle only in glass to ensure quality and sustainability.

Our process recreates the natural formation of water far beneath the earth's surface, where hydrogen and oxygen from heat and rock combine to make clean, pure H2O.

6 UNIQUELY COMBINED BENEFITS OF DIVINIA

CELLULAR

DIVINIA is scientifically known as EZ water, which means its the same water found in organic cells, like fruit. This is also known as fourth phase water, and h302. Testing of DIVINIA was done at the University of Washington.
ACTIVATED & OXYGENATED

The activated/energized/structured state of DIVINIA remains over time and temperature variances. DIVINIA is also naturally 102% oxygenated. Testing of DIVINIA was done at Penn State University.

DDW

Analytical tests measuring the parts per million of DIVINIA was accomplished at UC Davis. Benefits of deuterium depleted water are not endorsed by UC Davis. Learn more on our blog.

1000x PURER

Like a flawless diamond, DIVINIA is free from contaminants and is a 1000x purer than other water on the market. DIVINIA measures at less than 1.00 ppm on-site. Testing was done at Penn State University.

BIOAVAILABLE HYDROGEN

DIVINIA has higher energy stored in the h2o bond, making the hydrogen and oxygen naturally more bio-available; it is more hydrating than deionized water and rain water. Testing of DIVINIA was done at Amity University (clinical trials) and Penn State University.

PROPRIETARY

DIVINIA's proprietary process truly makes the water unique and vastly different from any other on the market. Purification technology was patented at US Patent Office. IP exclusive to DIVINIA only.

These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This Product is not intended to treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

Amos Moses #fundie disqus.com

Bruce Wang:
I hadn't planned to be here for 200 comments, I was passing through, but you've said so many unbelievably incredibly bizarre things that I'm still not sure that you're not putting me on. You've shown callous disregard for word definitions, and you've claimed to be a mind reader of every atheist that has ever lived and claim you know better than they do what they believe. You think nothing of calling other Christians false when they worship using the exact same Bible you do. You scream BLIND FAITH at me at every opportunity when I'm merely consulting authoritative reference materials and in the meantime you are more guilty than anyone else of blind faith. I just can't believe the words I'm reading from you. I'm not entirely certain you're really serious.

Amos Moses:
and yet that is what you are doing .... i have no concerns about my reputation ... it is already WELL established ..... nor do i give one wit about what anyone thinks of it .......

Bruce Wang:
It's well established all right. You have one zealotish fan, this Checkmate person who never says anything, just mindlessly upvotes you, and you use the same exact arguments against everyone else who is trying to get you to see reason.

Amos Moses:
you keep claiming science that you accept without any proof of your personal knowledge it is true ..... that is blind faith ........... and your continued argumentation is proof you know and accept God exists ..... but you are trying very hard to suppress that truth .... you are trying to hold that beach ball of truth under the water .... and you are struggling to suppress that beach ball of truth under the water and expending great effort to deny that truth .... but it keeps popping up .... and reminding you that He exists ..... but i am uncomfortable .... i expend no effort .... you do .....

Bruce Wang:
I don't need to be the one to obtain proof from it. That's been done already by people with far greater qualifications than me. You seem to think that because I'm not in Einstein's face challenging him about the theory of relativity, that I'm "blindly" following it. Well, no, it doesn't work that way. Just like when I'm asking you for proof of God, I don't necessarily want YOUR proof, I'm asking you to provide ANYBODY's. All you have are people's personal testimonies and statements of faith. NO ONE you can mention has proof of it, and saying that Jesus came to them at 3 am in a glowing vision isn't proof.
The mountains and walls of texts and the universities and libraries and halls of knowledge I'm talking about are chock full of PROOF. Do I understand how it works? In most cases, no, but I know that others have sufficiently tested them to know they are accurate. That isn't blind faith, by the way.

Amos Moses:
Blind faith can be practiced by anyone including atheists. Blind faith occurs when someone puts their faith into something without any evidence.
Atheists have blind faith in naturalism, abiogenesis and the multiverse as well as several other hypothesizes which are evidenceless.

Bruce Wang:
Obviously you cut and pasted that from somewhere because it doesn't have trails of periods after every sentence. No matter though, your definition here is quite correct. Only problem is, it says "without any evidence". And we DO have evidence, so what was the point of posting this quote?

Mike King #fundie tomatobubble.com

One of the ironies of the crackpot theory of "Evolution" TM, is that the deceitful dogma itself is always "evolving." Since the 1860's inception of Darwinian doctrine, mad scientists have bickered endlessly about how "Evolution" TM actually played out, never questioning the basic foundational assumption that life spontaneously, with neither reason nor guidance, emerged from non-life in the first place.

From Darwin's Origin of the Specious Species to the present day, the case for "Evolution" TM must, by necessity, rely upon the classic logical fallacies that are so evident to philosophers; yet completely invisible to arrogant "theoretical scientists" emotionally attached to a dogma disguised as "science." This idiotic article by renown "science journalist" and author Nicholas Wade is no different.

Haz Mat suits and goggle on. Into the "Primordial Soup" (or is it "deep sea vents" now?) we "wade" (corny pun intended).

"Shhhh, Mr. Wade. You must never tell anyone about the Anti-New York Times."

Wade: A surprisingly specific genetic portrait of the ancestor of all living things has been generated by scientists who say that the likeness sheds considerable light on the mystery of how life first emerged on Earth.

Rebuttal: Notice how it is already assumed, without evidence, that "all living things" have a common ancestor. (fallacy of assumed truth)

Wade: This venerable ancestor was a single-cell, bacterium-like organism. But it has a grand name, or at least an acronym. It is known as Luca, the Last Universal Common Ancestor, and is estimated to have lived some four billion years ago, when Earth was a mere 560 million years old.

Rebuttal: Mr. Wade, before you school us dumb plebes about Luca's birthplace, please prove to us that Luca even existed; and then prove how Luca "evolved" into other species; which in turned "evolved" and "evolved" millions of times into all current life forms. And by "proof," we mean observational evidence -- the very definition of the Scientific Method.

Wade: The new finding sharpens the debate between those who believe life began in some extreme environment, such as in deep sea vents or the flanks of volcanoes, and others who favor more normal settings, such as the “warm little pond” proposed by Darwin.

Rebuttal: Whatever happened to the "Primordial Soup" TM theory?

You see, these erudite eggheads love to "debate" endlessly over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, without ever demonstrating that there were actually any angels dancing on the pin, at all!

"Luca! We have you surrounded. Come out of that sea vent with your flagella up. And don't try any of that binary fission business"

They found little Luca in the deep sea, not the Primordial Soup as had once been theorized.

Wade: The nature of the earliest ancestor of all living things has long been uncertain because the three great domains of life (bacteria, plants, animals) seemed to have no common point of origin.

Rebuttal: Mr. Wade, has it ever occurred to you and your sci-fi cult that the reason why the various domains "seem to have no common point of origin" is because maybe, just maybe, they do not have a "common point of origin?"

Wade: Specialists have recently come to believe that the bacteria and archaea were the two earliest domains, with the eukaryotes emerging later. That opened the way for a group of evolutionary biologists, ... to try to discern the nature of the organism from which the domains emerged.

Translation: The high-priests of "Evolution" TM have just concocted a new theory to explain away the gaping holes in the previous theories.

Wade: Their starting point was the known protein-coding genes of bacteria and archaea. Some six million such genes have accumulated over the last 20 years in DNA databanks as scientists with the new decoding machines have deposited gene sequences from thousands of microbes.

Rebuttal: "DNA decoding machines" were used to sniff out little Luca --- (palm to face, deep sigh, shaking head)

Wade: Genes that do the same thing in a human and a mouse are generally related by common descent from an ancestral gene in the first mammal.

Rebuttal: The belief in the "common descent" between a human and a mouse is based on the fallacious prior assumption that we all came from Luca. It can just as easily be argued that DNA similarities between Mickey Mouse and Mickey Mantle are due to both of them having been designed by the same Creative Force which Tesla, Edison, Einstein (puke) all believed to exist. Hence, genetic similarities between the two Mickeys can be explained as cross-associations / basic templates of the same life-transmitting Creative Force which animates the universe.

Will the wonders of modern "science" ever cease?! The new Super Duper Decoding Machine not only links Mickey Mantle to the rodent family; it traced the birth of Luca to a deep sea vent!

Wade: By comparing their sequence of DNA letters, genes can be arranged in evolutionary family trees, a property that enabled Dr. Martin and his colleagues to assign the six million genes to a much smaller number of gene families.

Rebuttal: One can arrange and categorize the various "families" of automobiles (trucks, sports cars, SUV's, luxury cars, go-carts etcp) into a "tree" with many branches. Would their common component similarities therefore "prove" that Ferraris blindly "evolved" from school-buses?

Wade: Genes are adapted to an organism’s environment.

Rebuttal: Wrong again, Mr, Wade! The gene pool is not "adaptable." What happens sometimes is that environmental changes will favor one existing genetic trait over another. Hence, those specimens without the trait are at a disadvantage while those with it will prosper and produce offspring. This might explain why one group of finches has a beak like this while another group of finches has a beak like that. But it damn sure cannot explain how Marylyn Monroe and a putrid maggot have the same 1 millionth grandmother!

Wade: So Dr. Martin hoped that by pinpointing the genes likely to have been present in Luca, he would also get a glimpse of where and how Luca lived.

Rebuttal: "Likely to have been present in Luca" --- that's called conjecture, not science.

Wade: “I was flabbergasted at the result, I couldn’t believe it,” he said.

Rebuttal: We can't either.

Wade: The 355 genes pointed quite precisely to an organism that lived in the conditions found in deep sea vents, the gassy, metal-laden, intensely hot plumes caused by seawater interacting with magma erupting through the ocean floor.

Rebuttal: Cheese and crackers! We can't even find lost civilizations from a few thousand years ago and this academic ass-clown found little Luca in a deep sea vent?

Wade: Deep sea vents are surrounded by exotic life-forms and, with their extreme chemistry, have long seemed places where life might have originated.

Rebuttal: "Seemed" -- "might have." Save the speculative words for Star Trek or Jurassic Park, not the Science Section of a newspaper that so many people actually place trust in.

1- Mr. Spock of Star Trek says: "Evolution is not logical."

2- Some evolutionists now believe that T-Rex "evolved" into a bird.

Wade: The 355 genes ascribable to Luca include some that metabolize hydrogen as a source of energy as well as a gene for an enzyme called reverse gyrase, found only in microbes that live at extremely high temperatures...

Rebuttal: So, some of the genes "ascribed to" (speculative) this ancestral organism called Luca (never proved to have existed), are found in microbes that live at high temperature. Therefore, Mickey Mantle and Mickey Mouse, Marilyn and the maggot do all have a common ancestor after all. Brilliant! (palm to face, deep sigh, shaking head)

Wade: The finding has “significantly advanced our understanding of what Luca did for a living,” James O. McInerney of the University of Manchester wrote in a commentary, and provides “a very intriguing insight into life four billion years ago.”

Rebuttal: How does one even begin to respond to this madness?

Wade: Dr. Martin... argues that Luca is very close to the origin of life itself. The organism is missing so many genes necessary for life that it must still have been relying on chemical components from its environment. Hence it was only “half alive,” he writes.

Rebuttal: In other words, the "Luca-was-born-in-a-sea-vent" theory has so many holes that it requires another band-aid theory to keep it viable --- the "half alive" theory.

Wade: The fact that Luca depended on hydrogen and metals favors a deep sea vent environment for the origin of life, Dr. Martin concludes, rather than the land environment posited in a leading rival theory proposed by the chemist John Sutherland of the University of Cambridge in England.

Rebuttal: Wade, with his "Luca-was-born-in-a-sea-vent" theory, is seeking to dethrone Sutherland and his "Luca-was-born-on-land" theory as the crackpot theorist of the year. This heated competition among psychos has always been a comical feature of "theoretical science."

Wade: Luca and the origin of life are “events separated by a vast distance of evolutionary innovation,” said Jack Szostak of Massachusetts General Hospital, who has studied how the first cell membranes might have evolved.

Rebuttal: This crackpot believes in cellular life before Luca --- which means that there was another great great great grandma Luca long before "sea vent" Luca was born.

Wade: Dr. Sutherland too gave little credence to the argument that Luca might lie in some gray transition zone between nonlife and life just because it depended on its environment for some essential components. “It’s like saying I’m half alive because I depend on my local supermarket.”

Rebuttal: The lunatic Sutherland is dismissing the lunatic Martin. Just another day at the asylum of modern academia. Let the "academic debate" begin!

Wade: Dr. Sutherland and others have no quarrel with Luca’s being traced back to deep sea vents. But that does not mean life originated there, they say. Life could have originated anywhere and later been confined to a deep sea environment because of some catastrophic event like the Late Heavy Bombardment, which occurred 4 billion to 3.8 billion years ago.

Rebuttal: The Late Heavy Bombardment? What the heck was that?

Wade: This was a rain of meteorites that crashed into Earth with such force that the oceans were boiled off into an incandescent mist.

Rebuttal: Mr. Wade, can you cite for us the observational evidence for this "rain of meteorites" and the "boiling off" of the oceans?

Wade: Life is so complex it seems to need many millions of years to evolve.

Rebuttal: Circular logic! It goes like this:

"Life takes 'million of years' to 'evolve' --- We cannot observe this because it played out over 'millions of years.' "

Once upon a time, the meteors rained, the oceans boiled, and out popped little Luca -- with his millions of complex DNA codes, cell wall, cell membrane, cell plasma and flagella already intact.

Wade: Dr. Sutherland, working from basic principles of chemistry, has found that ultraviolet light from the sun is an essential energy source to get the right reactions underway, and therefore that land-based pools, not the ocean, are the most likely environment in which life began.

Translation:

Sutherland: "Luca came from a land pool, you idiot!"
Martin: "Nonsense, fool! Luca came from a deep sea vent!"
Sutherland: "Land pool!"
Martin: "Sea vent!"
Sutherland: "Your momma wears combat boots!"
Martin: "Your momma so ugly, the strip club paid her to keep her clothes on!"

Wade: "We didn’t set out with a preferred scenario; we deduced the scenario from the chemistry,” Sutherland said, chiding Dr. Martin for not having done any chemical simulations to support the deep sea vent scenario.

Rebuttal: You tell him, Dr. Sutherland! The absence of chemical simulations means that Dr. Martin's theory has no merit.

Say, Dr. Sutherland, can you tell us about your "chemical simulations" that prove that life came from non-life, formed in a land pool and then evolved and evolved and evolved? Just sayin'.

Wade: Dr. Martin’s portrait of Luca “is all very interesting, but it has nothing to do with the actual origin of life,” Dr. Sutherland said.

Rebuttal: So, Dr. Sutherland is saying that Dr. Martin is an even nuttier mad scientist than he is? --- OK. We'll accept that.

Ken Ham & Dr. Andrew Snelling #fundie answersingenesis.org

Dinosaur Footprint Wall in Bolivia

A recent article highlighted the Cal Orcko archaeological site in Bolivia. This site in South America has numerous, well-preserved dinosaur footprints (originally listed as over 5,000), and another 5,000 tracks were discovered in 2015. Some of the dinosaurs that left these footprints were Ankylosaurs, Titanosaurs, Carnotaurus, and a juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex.

These fossilized dinosaur footprints were originally discovered in 1985, but local mining of the limestone in the area has brought many more prints to light, starting in 1994. The area is now an official Bolivian paleontological site and an application has been submitted to designate it as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

But even more interesting is that the footprints are not on flat ground but rather on an almost vertical wall; and the vast majority seem to be moving in one direction (downhill as the geography now stands). Now this is a region that has had lots of tectonic activity in the recent past, so this was probably flat ground at the time the dinosaurs were making the tracks.

Of course what makes this intriguing from a biblical creation and Flood geology perspective is that the tracks are preserved so well, and that we see a diverse grouping of what were considered to be both herbivores and carnivores. We also have tracks from juvenile dinosaurs—some alone and others side by side with adults of the same species. A couple of quotes about the Cal Orcko archaeological site from the Guardian website really stood out:

That ankylosaur was running. It sank its four toes into the ground, rather than its heel. . . .

The creatures' feet sank into the soft shoreline in warm damp weather, leaving marks that were solidified by later periods of drought. Wet weather then returned, sealing the prints below mud and sediment. The wet-dry pattern was repeated seven times, preserving multiple layers of prints. The cherry on the cake was added when tectonic activity pushed the flat ground up to a brilliant viewing angle—as if nature was aware of its tourism potential.

So we have running dinosaurs and what appears to be alternating periods of water covering the sand flats and then receding for a short time, only to cover the area once again. This sounds a lot like an area where dinosaurs may have been fleeing rising floodwaters, which brought the sediment to quickly cover and preserve the footprints the fleeing dinosaurs left behind.

Dr. Andrew Snelling, geologist and AiG’s director of research, had this to say:

All claims about the environment in which these dinosaurs lived and how they left their footprints are mere speculation (i.e., based on historical science, not observational science), because no scientists were there at the time to observe and report to us what happened. So it is hardly an observed fact that this was a lake. But what we do observe is that these footprints were made in a sandy limestone, and that in that same limestone are the fossilized remains of snails, bivalves, fish, turtles and crocodiles.1 Furthermore, we know from observations that animals and footprints are not fossilized in lime sand that slowly accumulates and is exposed even for a brief period to bacteria, and the sun, wind and waves. Rapid accumulation and rapid burial are required. And lime sand is usually produced by turbulent ocean waters. Yet dinosaurs are land-dwellers. Thus these fossils of water-dwelling animals and fossilized dinosaur footprints found in this sandy limestone are consistent with the Flood cataclysm, when the rising ocean waters swept rapidly over the land in oscillating surges, repeatedly engulfing fleeing land animals as it buried their footprints with water-dwelling animals. These fossilized dinosaur footprints testify to these dinosaur herbivores and carnivores being more interested in fleeing en masse in one direction to escape the destructive waters than their next meal.

Yet again we see evidence of the Flood that God sent as a judgment for mankind’s wickedness (Genesis 6:17) and of the Ark that He had Noah build—a reminder to us today of another Ark of salvation, Jesus Christ. These fossilized footprints stand as a reminder that observational science always confirms the Bible.

Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying,
Ken

This item was written with the assistance of AiG’s research team.

Footnotes

See Martin Lockley et al., “Titanosaurid Trackways from the Upper Cretaceous of Bolivia: Evidence for Large Manus, Wide-Gauge Locomotion and Gregarious Behaviour,” Cretaceous Research 23, no. 3 (June 2002): 383–400, doi:10.1006/cres.2002.1006.

Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

This is some pretty disturbing stuff, isn’t it? Well, those Holocaust concentration camps were very disturbing as well. When we see millions of people starving to death in a nationwide famine or dropping over with flu-like symptoms, it’s disturbing. When we see whole cities being bombed off the map and men massacring each other on the battlefield, it’s disturbing. In the Bible, God tells us that He’s the One responsible for all of it. So now we get to that million dollar question: What’s His point?

There are two ways that Christians act utterly absurd when it comes to discussing God’s role in mass killings. First, they try to deny that He is even involved—that is the height of lunacy. But once they finally do acknowledge that He’s involved, they act like the whole affair can be simply explained with some trite statement like, “He must have been mad at the people who died.” Here is more lunacy. You can’t be sure of God’s reasons for one soul dying, let alone millions. God has a long list of reasons for why He kills souls when He does. You can be familiar with some of the items on that list, but you can’t ever pinpoint which reason was motivating God’s actions in a specific event unless you receive explicit direction from Him. For the most part, God just isn’t going to tell you why He’s doing what He’s doing with another soul, because He considers it none of your business. God doesn’t even sit down and fully explain why He does what He does with you, so it’s more than a little absurd to stand around declaring that you know exactly why certain souls were gassed to death in Nazi concentration camps while others were not. The reality is that you don’t have the first clue. What you do know is that there is never any “one size fits all” answer in these scenarios. The best we can do is talk about probabilities.

The vast majority of souls in this world will never submit to God’s Authority while they are here, therefore they will end up in Hell. This is a reality that has been true since the very beginning: most humans reject God. Now once we die in a state of spiritual rebellion, God’s feelings towards us become intensely negative. “Unconditional love” is an utter delusion that we’ve invented to please our egos. God has always taught that His love is extremely conditional. We all start off being loved for free—we’ve done nothing to earn it. God chooses to love us just because He wants to. But He then says that this period of generosity will come to an end if we don’t treat Him with a certain level of respect. He also promises that our time on this planet will be extremely brief, yet none of us will know exactly how much time we have. Some of us will only be here a matter of days or hours. Others a few years, others will live to a ripe old age. But from the eternal perspective, even living to be a 110 is a mere flash in the pan. These facts put all of us in a rather urgent situation. If we defy God for too long, we might suddenly find ourselves struck down by Him and out of chances to repent. How does God feel when He is killing off defiant rebels? Angry, disgusted, vengeful—it’s a very negative combination of passions. How does God feel when He is killing off souls who sincerely care about pleasing Him? He’s very delighted with them and eager to bring them to their reward. What are the chances that every soul who got gassed in Nazi concentration camps was sincerely seeking God? Zilch. The far more likely scenario was that there was a blend of defiant rebels, hardcore believers, and carnal slackers. We could say the same for all the casualties of both World Wars and for all of the groups that we listed previously. Once you start dealing in massive casualties, it is quite unrealistic to suggest that everyone had the same spiritual attitude towards God, therefore it is ridiculous to paint God as having one emotion towards the whole group. God never loses track of individuals in a crowd. If you scoop up some sand on a beach, you see a handful of sand, but God sees a mass of uniquely shaped sand crystals which are each interesting in their own way. In the same way, when you read about mass casualties in the news, you start lumping all the souls together under some irrelevant label like “the Jews” or “the plane crash victims” or “the soldiers.” But God sees individual souls and His feelings towards each of those souls vary widely depending on how each soul is currently responding to Him.

Understanding that God always views us as unique individuals helps you to understand how personal His actions in each life are. It simply doesn’t work to say “all the Jews in that town were dragged off to the Holocaust,” because in real life certain Jews were hidden away in basements by people who were trying to take the high moral ground. How do we explain these anomalies? How do we explain why some survived the concentration camps and others did not? How do we explain why some were able to forgive and move on, while others were permanently crippled? The answer is that God’s care of each of us is extremely personal and strategic.

Old Man Montgomery #fundie oldmanmontgomery.wordpress.com

[=Authors Note: For the sake of trimming, some of the Bible verses in the original page have been removed=]

From the website of ‘johnshore.com’

These were published and dated December 16, 2010. I have only recently become aware of this ‘movement’ via Facebook. (One never knows what one will find there.) These are referred to as the “Sixteen Tenets of ‘unfundamentalist Christians’ , known also or previously known as ‘ThruWay Christians’. Being the old-fashioned, hard-nosed Bible thumper that I am, I disagree with some facets of this and the conclusions of the entirety.

Of course I have reasons and those reasons are published below. Just for convenience, I numbered the statements, replacing what appeared in my copy as a paragraph ‘dot’.

Just for the record, as the article was dated December 16, 2010, it is entirely possible Mr. Shore has completely changed his mind and recanted this whole document. On the other hand, I just checked Mr. Shore’s last blog entry and he’s still pitching the “UnFund” theme.

Caution: If the reader is not a Christian believer, much of this discussion will seem pointless. Feel free to read on, but if you’re confused, don’t worry, it happens to lots of folks.

Here beings the tenets:

1. Jesus Christ was God incarnate. He performed miracles; as a means of providing for the irrevocable reconciliation of humankind to God he sacrificed himself on the cross; he rose from the dead; he left behind for the benefit of all people the totality of himself in the form of the indwelling Holy Spirit.

So far, I’m in agreement. Jesus is God incarnate; the ‘Son’ who is God Himself. Jesus was executed and killed (no alternatives) on a Roman cross under Roman law. Jesus’ death was the final sacrifice needed to atone for the sin of all people who appeal to Him for forgiveness. Jesus rose from the dead on the third day showing Himself to be God and giving a promise to all of an Eternal life in Heaven with Him. He sent the Third Person of the Godhead, the ‘Holy Spirit’ to believers after His ascension.

2. Christ and Christianity are meant to be understood, appreciated, and experienced as galvanizing inspirations for living a life of love, compassion, fairness, peace, and humility. Period.

Now we’re disagreeing. The primary purpose and function of Christianity is to repair the breach between God and mankind due to mankind’s rebellion and disobedience. Being forgiven by Jesus and redeemed by His sacrifice, mankind can have a direct and proper relationship with God. The qualities of love, compassion, fairness, peace and humility are by-products of that proper relationship, not the primary aim.

Am I splitting hairs here? Not as much as one might think; the matter becomes clearer as we proceed.

3. The Bible is a collection of a great many separate documents written by different people in different languages over thousands of years. Properly understanding both the letter and spirit of the Bible necessarily entails taking into account the historical and cultural contexts that so greatly inform so much of its text. The size, density, history and complexity of the Bible render unfeasible the idea that not one of its words reflects more man’s will than God’s. The spirit of God is inerrant; people—even those impassioned by the conviction that God is speaking directly to or through them—are not.

The one starts out well and descends into heresy. The Bible was written over a period of approximately 1500 years. The Books of Moses, the Torah – sometimes Pentateuch, was written in the period between the Exodus from Egypt, around 1400 B. C. to the time of the Babylonian Captivity, around 600 to 530 B. C. (give or take a decade or so.) The book of Revelation, written by John the Apostle was written around 90 A. D. The rest was written somewhere in between, with the possible exception of Job. Job was one of the earliest sections written and may predate Moses. The Bible was assuredly written by at least forty different authors. (For instance, the books of Judges, Kings and Chronicles were written over periods of time and one author could not have written them all; they require accounts from events several hundred years apart. The Torah was more than likely written by a number of scribes with Moses or a later, Babylonian scholar as ‘editor’ and having final input. Genesis is obviously based on oral traditions of the Israelite nation.) The books reflect social conventions and cultural coloring of the times involved.

However, it is the message of Almighty God to humanity. No matter how much a human can foul up, the integrity of the message is based on God’s ability to ensure His message is properly passed on. No human can foul up or outright lie good enough to defeat God’s purpose. So as much as mankind wrote the words on paper (papyrus or whatever), the ‘Word’ (Greek ‘logos’, meaning idea, identity or concept) is that of God. As such, it is inerrant in message.

The idea of the Bible being ‘written by man and therefore possibly distorted’ is an old heresy. It was argued about in the earliest councils trying to settle on the ‘Bible’ and is the basis for several cults who claim to be Christian, but rely on teachings of extra Biblical origin. The heresy also finds much favor among those who wish to discredit any one particular facet of Christian doctrine. Under any version, the idea the Bible isn’t correct means either God really doesn’t care about the message or God is incapable of protecting His own plan. Christians cannot in good faith (no pun intended) accept either alternative.

4. Anyone seeking to mix church and state has failed to understand the nature and proper role of either. Belief that all people are created equal and are deserving of equal protection under the law is foundational to all modern democratic nations. To incorporate the inherently exclusionary imperatives of a particular religion into the determinedly inclusive system of democracy would be to undermine the very spirit of democracy by pushing it toward a theocracy.

This is a pretty silly statement and is highly ignorant of history. The ‘foundational’ belief of people being created equal and deserving equal protection under law is uniquely derived from the Judeo-Christian tradition. It is not found in Islam, Confucianism, Buddhism, Hinduism or any of the other ‘religions’ of the world. It is Christianity that fostered Democracy, not Democracy that fostered Christianity.

Additionally, it was Christian believers and supporters who founded the United States as a nation with no state religion. The United States was not founded as a ‘Christian nation’, but was indeed begun as a ‘nation of Christians’. To pretend otherwise is to ignore history and to invite serious question as to the point of the discussion. One must also note that all movements to ‘remove’ the influence of Christianity from the United States and civil laws result in the promotion of either Secular Humanism or Islam.

There are no moral vacuums.

5. It’s not possible to read Paul’s New Testament writings and remain unmoved by his open heart, intellectual prowess, and staggering bravery. And yet Paul (who, after all, spent years zealously persecuting and having executed untold numbers of Christians) must remain to us a mortal man. More than reasonable, it is incumbent upon those who claim to seek the deepest knowledge of Christ to subject the words of Paul to the same kinds of objective analysis we would the words of any man daring to describe the qualities, purposes, and desires of God.

This is a gentle, lofty and seemingly reasonable attempt to undermine the message presented by God through Paul the Apostle. What this statement does is deny the Divine inspiration and authorship of the Bible as a whole. It returns to the fore in a moment with more of the ‘villify Paul’ agenda.

6. With regards to the written identity of God, the pronoun “he” is a necessity of the English language, not an actual anatomical designation. God is neither male nor female; God contains all of both.

Again, agreement. In Hebrew, just as in English, the male pronoun unless specifically intended refers to both male and female. Jesus says (John 4:23 and 24)“But a time is coming – and now is here – when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father seeks such people to be his worshipers. God is spirit, and the people who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.” Also one notes in Genesis (chapter one, verses 26 and 27)
“Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, after our likeness, so they may rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move on the earth.”
God created humankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them,
male and female he created them.

So, both male and female were (still are, more or less, being distorted from the original model by mankind’s disobedience) created in God’s image; which manifestly means not a physical image, but a mental and spiritual image.

7. The Biblical scholarship supporting the idea that Paul never wrote a word proscribing natural homosexuality is at least as credible and persuasive as the scholarship (if not typical Bible translations) claiming that he did. Any person who uses the words of Paul in the New Testament to “prove” that homosexuality is a sin against God has either never themselves researched the matter, or has simply chosen to believe one set of equal proofs over another. Though laziness is easily enough understood, we remain mystified as to why anyone who purports to follow Jesus would choose to condemn an entire population over choosing to obey Jesus’ self-proclaimed Greatest Commandment to love one’s neighbor as one loves oneself.

Here’s the follow up to point 5. Once Paul is ‘questionable’, the condemnation of homosexuality can be dismissed as a personal quirk, or possibly an outright error on the part of Christianity (on the whole).

Here’s the premise of the tenet: Paul either really didn’t mean what he wrote about the practice of homosexuality despite what is clearly written in the original Greek manuscripts and all subsequent translations of the Bible, or Paul was mistaken and therefore not inspired by God. What an amazing statement.

Either God inspired and authored the Bible or not. If one chooses to deny God’s inspiration in part, then the whole becomes suspect. If God was lax in allowing Paul to write and publish errors, then what of the rest of the Bible is trustworthy? Conversely, if God did in fact inspire and author the Bible, then Paul’s writing is equally trustworthy.

Leviticus 18
This entire section (several chapters) deals with sexual sins and prohibitions. In part (I have inserted whole paragraphs to present an in context view):
19 You must not approach a woman in her menstrual impurity to have sexual intercourse with her. 20 You must not have sexual intercourse with the wife of your fellow citizen to become unclean with her. 21 You must not give any of your children as an offering to Molech, so that you do not profane the name of your God. I am the Lord! 22 You must not have sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman; it is a detestable act. 23 You must not have sexual intercourse with any animal to become defiled with it, and a woman must not stand before an animal to have sexual intercourse with it; it is a perversion.
Leviticus 20
9 “‘If anyone curses his father and mother he must be put to death. He has cursed his
father and mother; his blood guilt is on himself. 10 If a man commits adultery with his neighbor’s wife, both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death. 11 If a man has sexual intercourse with his father’s wife, he has exposed his father’s nakedness. Both of them must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves. 12 If a man has sexual intercourse with his daughter-in-law, both of them must be put to death. They have committed perversion; their blood guilt is on themselves. 13 If a man has sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman, the two of them have committed an abomination. They must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves. 14 If a man has sexual intercourse with both a woman and her mother, it is lewdness. Both he and they must be burned to death, so there is no lewdness in your midst. 15 If a man has sexual intercourse with any animal, he must be put to death, and you must kill the animal. 16 If a woman approaches any animal to have sexual intercourse with it, you must kill the woman, and the animal must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves.

These two passages are from the Torah, the first five books of the Old Testament. One can argue these are part of the Jewish or Mosaic Law and are therefore obsolete; in that case, general adultery, incest and bestiality are also permitted along with homosexual conduct. Or is that the point?

First Timothy 1 (written by that suspect Paul fellow)

8 But we know that the law is good if someone uses it legitimately, 9 realizing that law is not intended for a righteous person, but for lawless and rebellious people, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 sexually immoral people, practicing homosexuals, kidnappers, liars, perjurers – in fact, for any who live contrary to sound teaching. 11 This accords with the glorious gospel of the blessed God that was entrusted to me.

There is a note on the phrase ‘practicing homosexuals’ in verse 10 from the NET Bible: “…this term… ??se?????t?? states, “a male who engages in sexual activity w. a pers. of his own sex, pederast 1 Cor 6:9…of one who assumes the dominant role in same-sex activity, opp. µa?a???…1 Ti 1:10; Pol 5:3. Cp. Ro 1:27.” L&N 88.280 states, “a male partner in homosexual intercourse – ‘homosexual.’…It is possible that ??se?????t?? in certain contexts refers to the active male partner in homosexual intercourse in contrast with µa?a???, the passive male partner” (cf. 1 Cor 6:9). Since there is a distinction in contemporary usage between sexual orientation and actual behavior, the qualification “practicing” was supplied in the translation…”

First Corinthians 6 (also written by that questionable Paul)
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! The sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, passive homosexual partners, practicing homosexuals, 10 thieves, the greedy, drunkards, the verbally abusive, and swindlers will not inherit the kingdom of God. 11 Some of you once lived this way. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

This last passage strikes me an illuminating. Homosexuals are included in a list of sin categories which include heterosexual sexual sinners, idolaters, adulterers (distinct from ‘sexually immoral heterosexuals), thieves, greedy, drunkards, verbally abusive and swindlers. The phrase ‘verbally abusive’ is rather interesting. The NIV translates it as ‘slanderers’; I think ‘gossips’ might easily fit into the meaning. At any rate, people who say nasty things about others are lumped in with murderers, thieves and the sexually immoral (of any type).

The last verse in the paragraph implies a change of life in those reading the letter. “Some of you … lived… But you were washed… sanctified… justified…” So they were not just forgiven and allowed to continue; they changed their values and life-styles. The same implication applies to the sexually impure; they don’t do that sort of thing anymore; they avoid that sort of thing; they are ashamed of and denounce their own past behavior.

Therefore, the Old Testament writings prohibited homosexual conduct as does the writings of Paul, therefore the New Testament. The words used really do mean homosexual conduct and not just the generic ‘sexual misconduct’.

I’m really curious about the ‘equal scholarship’ which demonstrates what the Bible says isn’t what it means. I’d like to examine the line of thought and arguments.

The statement “…Jesus’ self-proclaimed Greatest Commandment to love one’s neighbor as one loves oneself” is incorrect and sloppy scholarship.

Matthew 22:
35 And one of them, an expert in religious law, asked him a question to test him: 36 “Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?” 37 Jesus 44 said to him, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ 38 This is the first and greatest commandment.

This tenet goes past ‘unfundamentalism’ and is squarely non-Christian.

8. It is much more reasonable—and certainly more compassionate—to hold that throughout history God chose to introduce himself in different ways into different cultural streams than it is to believe that there is only one correct way to understand and worship God, and that the punishment for anyone who chooses any but that way is to spend all of eternity having the living flesh seared off of his or her bones.

More reasonable? By who’s standard? As a Christian, the only viewpoint that counts is God’s viewpoint. That ‘viewpoint’ is expressed in the Bible, which is – as noted prior – God’s message to humanity.

More compassionate? To whom? Not to mention under what definition of ‘compassion’? I find no compassion in patting someone in error on the head and say comforting words while allowing them to remain in error at the risk of Eternal Death.

So let’s go along with the idea of God introducing Himself into different cultural streams in different ways. Why would introduce Himself in a totally different manner if He’s the same, Eternal God? For instance, in the sub-continent which is now India, why would God decide not to be the Eternal God of Creation of the Jewish people, but instead be represented by a pantheon of conflicting gods which change over time? Why would Almighty God manifest Himself as the volcano god, demanding virgin sacrifices? Would God happily change Himself into the Great Green Arkleseizure of Viltvodle VI?

Is He still God? Is He bored and just experimenting? Can He not remember who He is, from epoch to epoch?

The idea appeals to the ‘open-minded’ who have no ideas about who God is, or what He should be or do. The concept flies in the face of the ultimate creator of the Universe and all things that exist, who is Eternal and changeless, who is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent. In other words, God.

Again, not just ‘unfundamentalist’, but not very good thinking and doctrinally non Christian.

9. “No one comes to the Father except through me” does not mean that in the afterlife only Christians can get into heaven. It means that Jesus/God decides who does and doesn’t make it in.

From this one is forced to believe Jesus will not judge between those who accept Him and those who don’t, but instead will judge by ad hoc rules of ‘good behavior’. I say ‘ad hoc’ because no such rules are outlined in the Bible.

All that stuff about believing in the Son and relying on Him in tenet 1 are out the window, then? It is good deeds that really make the difference?

This heresy is remarkably old as well. It predates Christianity, in fact.

Jesus mentioned this concept in Matthew Seven, starting with verse 15:
15 “Watch out for false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are voracious wolves. 16 You will recognize them by their fruit. Grapes are not gathered from thorns or figs from thistles, are they? 17 In the same way, every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree is not able to bear bad fruit, nor a bad tree to bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 So then, you will recognize them by their fruit.
21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of heaven – only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. 22 On that day, many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, didn’t we prophesy in your name, and in your name cast out demons and do many powerful deeds?’ 23 Then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you. Go away from me, you lawbreakers!’
24 “Everyone who hears these words of mine and does them is like a wise man who built his house on rock. 25 The rain fell, the flood came, and the winds beat against that house, but it did not collapse because it had been founded on rock. 26 Everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. 27 The rain fell, the flood came, and the winds beat against that house, and it collapsed; it was utterly destroyed!”
So then, what about “… the one who does the will of my Father in heaven…”? John 15, starting with verse nine makes it clear:
9 “Just as the Father has loved me, I have also loved you; remain in my love. 10 If you obey my commandments, you will remain in my love, just as I have obeyed my Father’s commandments and remain in his love. 11 I have told you these things so that my joy may be in you, and your joy may be complete.”

Nowhere in the Bible, nowhere in the quotations of Jesus, nowhere in the letters of the various apostles and elders in Jerusalem is any such doctrine mentioned or taught. In one setting (John 10:14-18), Jesus says,
14 “I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me – 15 just as the Father knows me and I know the Father – and I lay down my life for the sheep. 16 I have other sheep that do not come from this sheepfold. I must bring them too, and they will listen to my voice, so that there will be one flock and one shepherd. 17 This is why the Father loves me – because I lay down my life, so that I may take it back again. 18 No one takes it away from me, but I lay it down of my own free will. I have the authority to lay it down, and I have the authority to take it back again. This commandment I received from my Father.”

Verse 16 is often used to ‘prove’ the heresy of various versions of God and or Jesus running about in human history, showing up in various forms and guises. One fellow seriously suggested it could indicate the existence of extra-terrestrial life. Actually, the statement simply indicates non-Jewish people were included. That’s all.

I personally don’t have any problem with extra-terrestrial life, or any of them being in Heaven. But it will be on the basis of an individual relationship with Jesus Christ.

I am also firmly convinced all the inhabitants of planet Earth will have adequate notice of the person and Deity of Jesus Christ. God is not the sort of being who looks for tiny excuses and ‘foot-faults’ to disqualify anyone from Heaven.

10. The question of whether or not hell is real is properly subsumed by the truth that a moment spent worrying if you’ll be with God in the afterlife is an opportunity missed to be with God in this life.

I agree. There is no point of wondering, let alone worrying, if Hell is real. Jesus talks about it too much to be in doubt. It isn’t pleasant, but it’s there. One is obliged to take note and do something to avoid residence.

11. God’s will and intention is to forgive and teach us, not to judge and punish us.

That is true, but only to a qualified extent. Jesus came to Earth as a mortal man to tell us what to do to avoid Eternal punishment and die in our place to pay the price for our sin. Obviously, God the Father was in on this plan as was the Holy Spirit.

God really does not want anyone to spend Eternity in Hell. However, since all mankind is in the default position of being in rebellion against God, mankind is by default condemned to Eternal Hell.

The words of Jesus in John, chapter three:
16 For this is the way God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world should be saved through him. 18 The one who believes in him is not condemned. The one who does not believe has been condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the one and only Son of God. 19 Now this is the basis for judging: that the light has come into the world and people loved the darkness rather than the light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For everyone who does evil deeds hates the light and does not come to the light, so that their deeds will not be exposed. 21 But the one who practices the truth comes to the light, so that it may be plainly evident that his deeds have been done in God.
God is loving and concerned. God is simultaneously honest and just. God is God and that means – in a long list of other things – He will always conduct Himself as God and be true to His own nature.

There are also a number of references warning that when Jesus returns – ‘The Second Coming’ – He will in fact judge all people according to their alliances.

12. The only person who should be actively endeavoring to convert non-Christians into Christians is God. Jesus does not need our help drawing people towards him. He does need, or could certainly use, our help in making sure that people know that they are, just as they are, loved.

This statement directly contradicts the command of Jesus.

Matthew 28:16-20
16 So the eleven disciples went to Galilee to the mountain Jesus had designated. 17 When they saw him, they worshiped him, but some doubted. 18 Then Jesus came up and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And remember, I am with you always, to the end of the age

Acts 1
6 So when they had gathered together, they began to ask him, “Lord, is this the time when you are restoring the kingdom to Israel?” 7 He told them, “You are not permitted to know the times or periods that the Father has set by his own authority. 8 But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the farthest parts of the earth.” 9 After he had said this, while they were watching, he was lifted up and a cloud hid him from their sight.

First Peter 3
15 But set Christ apart as Lord in your hearts and always be ready to give an answer to anyone who asks about the hope you possess. (“Hope” here meaning the expectation of Eternal life with God.)

So in this statement again, the concept is not ‘un-fundamentalist’ but ‘un-Christian’.

13. Getting a divorce is painful, and if at all possible should certainly be avoided. But ultimately the act in and of itself is not immoral.

This statement flatly contradicts Jesus’ teaching on the subject.

Matthew 5
31 “It was said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife must give her a legal document.’ 32 But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Matthew 19
3 Then some Pharisees came to him in order to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful to divorce a wife for any cause?” 4 He answered, “Have you not read that from the beginning the Creator made them male and female, 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and will be united with his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” 7 They said to him, “Why then did Moses command us to give a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her?” 8 Jesus said to them, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because of your hard hearts, but from the beginning it was not this way. 9 Now I say to you that whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another commits adultery.” 10 The disciples said to him, “If this is the case of a husband with a wife, it is better not to marry!”11 He said to them, “Not everyone can accept this statement, except those to whom it has been given. 12 For there are some eunuchs who were that way from birth, and some who were made eunuchs by others, and some who became eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who is able to accept this should accept it.”

So yes, Jesus said divorce is an immoral act, save for the cause of adultery. Even then, the divorced man or woman is limited in options.

14. God does not want any woman “submitting” to anyone.

Another direct contradiction of Biblical teaching.

Ephesians 5
22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord, 23 because the husband is the head of the wife as also Christ is the head of the church – he himself being the savior of the body. 24 But as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. 25 Husbands, love your wives just as Christ loved the church and gave himself for her 26 to sanctify her by cleansing her with the washing of the water by the word, 27 so that he may present the church to himself as glorious – not having a stain or wrinkle, or any such blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In the same way husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.

Colossians 3
18 Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. 19 Husbands, love your wives and do not be embittered against them.

Oh, wait! That’s that questionable Paul again! Since Paul is so very questionable, we can ignore much of his writings – especially the parts about moral conduct, sexual misconduct and general carryings-on.

First Peter 3
1 In the same way, wives, be subject to your own husbands. Then, even if some are disobedient to the word, they will be won over without a word by the way you live, 2 when they see your pure and reverent conduct… like Sarah who obeyed Abraham, calling him lord. You become her children when you do what is good and have no fear in doing so. 7 Husbands, in the same way, treat your wives with consideration as the weaker partners and show them honor as fellow heirs of the grace of life. In this way nothing will hinder your prayers.

That’s the summation of Peter the Apostle. He agrees with Paul the suspect.

15. There were no dinosaurs on Noah’s ark; Jesus didn’t have a pet stegosaurus. An all-powerful God and the theory of evolution are not incompatible.

Whooop! Whooop! Whooop! Strawman Alert!
So, just where do we find claims of dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark? Which gospel contains the story of Jesus and His pet stegosaurus? What kind of hairball ploy is this?

Okay, “An all-powerful God and the theory of evolution are not incompatible.” That part is reasonable enough. However, this isn’t a matter of doctrinal distinction; it’s a matter of textual examination.

Dinosaurs on the Ark? Sheesh.

16. The single most telling indicator of a person’s moral character has nothing to do with how they define or worship God, and everything to do with how they treat others.

So, a relationship with God isn’t important; what is important is ‘good deeds’.

Actually, this is a deceptive argument; somewhat strawman in nature. I’ll agree one’s ‘moral character’ is not always dependent on how one defines or worships God. However, one’s moral character has nothing to do with one’s Eternal estate, being in a proper relationship with God and spending Eternity with God in Heaven.

One can be a rotten skunk and be bound for Heaven, or a very decent, clean, honest and honorable person going to Hell.

I know for a fact that my moral character was – for that matter ‘is’ – not always as good and shining as it ought to be. After becoming a Christian, I have sinned grievously, often and cheerfully. But my eternal destination is already secure and in Jesus’ care. As far as God is concerned in Judgment, I am as pure as Jesus.

Which is not to say I’m content in my life that way, or at peace with God. I found I was a jittery, angry, depressed, unsettled maniac; at least some combination of two or three of those. I can hide it well, but it’s there and I am very aware of it.

What happens is this: God works on me to make me into who – the type of person – He wants me to be, fit for Heaven in Eternity.

To conclude:

“Un-fundamentalists” accept the Deity, Sacrifice, Resurrection and Redemptive nature and power of Jesus Christ. However, they also believe God has appeared in other forms and guises, seemingly revealing other versions of Himself. So Jesus really isn’t uniquely God at all.

“Un-fundamentalists” deny the Divinely Inspired nature of the Bible, strip Paul’s writing of authority and accept homosexual misconduct – and by inference, heterosexual misconduct – as both normal and moral.

“Un-fundamentalists” claim the goal of Christianity is to live a good life; ‘good’ being defined by not offending anyone, getting along with all and ignoring Biblical principles if adherence would cause a row.

“Un-fundamentalists” believe Christians should not vote in accordance with Biblical principles. Nor should laws follow the long held traditions of either Judaism or Christianity.

“Un-fundamentalists” do not assume responsibility for evangelism; in fact, evangelism is discouraged.

“Un-fundamentalists” believe God never criticizes or judges human conduct. They believe there is no Hell. After all, God isn’t going to punish anyone for anything anyway.

All things considered, “Un-fundamentalist Christian” is not a properly descriptive phrase. Citing the serious theological and doctrinal differences between this cult and mainstream Christianity, I would suggest perhaps “Nearly Christian” would be a better description. Since the first tenet does recognize Jesus as God, perhaps “Barely Christian” would do.

Now, I know some bright soul is going to jump on me with the Biblical injunction of “Judge not, lest ye be judged”. The statement comes in Matthew 7, starting with the beginning of the chapter. The whole paragraph reads as follows:

1 “Do not judge so that you will not be judged. 2 For by the standard you judge you will be judged, and the measure you use will be the measure you receive. 3 Why do you see the speck in your brother’s eye, but fail to see the beam of wood in your own? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye,’ while there is a beam in your own? 5 You hypocrite! First remove the beam from your own eye, and then you can see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye. 6 Do not give what is holy to dogs or throw your pearls before pigs; otherwise they will trample them under their feet and turn around and tear you to pieces.

This whole speech is addressed at being judgmental of other people in regard to their fitness or standing before God. I am not ‘judging’ any person, but a set of beliefs and how they measure up to Christianity, I am not violating any injunction. Indeed, I am following a warning given by John the Revelator in First John 4:

1 Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to determine if they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses Jesus as the Christ who has come in the flesh is from God, 3 but every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God, and this is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming, and now is already in the world.

So I am testing this ‘spirit’, this claim of revelation of God. I find interesting that tenet 1 claims to recognize Jesus as the Son of God in the Flesh, and then denies Jesus’ Deity in most of the subsequent tenets.

Frankie Lee #fundie wnd.com

[Matt Barber says he won't support Trump because he's not a Christian]

Matt Barber,how come you get conned by Liberal Medias,uttering the same nonsense?

U:He was humble because he was humbled.

Me: Trump is the most humble man,I had ever seen.It doesn't fit the Medias narrative,right?

For ages,Trump humbled before his employees,contributed Funds to many people,had a low profile...ironically he is high profile?He welcome people,black or White, never show himself as Proud.Yes,he is boastful,but not prideful.

U:“I don’t like to have to ask for forgiveness. Why do I have to repent or ask for forgiveness, if I am not making mistakes?”

Me: Every Christian agrees with Trump,that is,we should not make mistakes,or sin,but only doing the Right thing;and only when you make mistakes,you ask for forgiveness.

What is wrong on Trump response?Nothing.Nil.Zero.The only right perception we must have is...Trump was insisting that we must be righteous.Trump seek to do the right thing only...his goal,his passion and his life...by being Righteous.

Instead of applauding him,False narratives were all over the places,and some Christians were dupe,and include you.

Rita Martinez #fundie raycomfortfood.blogspot.com

I liked Leon Brown's question to one atheist while he was open air preaching, he asked the man, "How many grains of sand are in the beach out there" (referring to the beach that was nearby) The man of course says "I have no idea", Leon goes on to say "And you're gonna tell me there is no God. And you can't tell me how many grains of sand are there. In this big world, so infinite and vast you can't tell me how many grains of sand are there, and yet you can tell me there is no God"

Elijah Saatori #fundie constellation7.org

The implications of the final confirmed discovery of
the Actual Ark used by Noah and his family, 1656 years
after the Creation of Adam, are so far reaching, as to
dwarf all other archaeological discoveries ever made.
Hard proof of the Great Flood is not confined only
to the Discovery of the remains of the Actual Ark.

The following additional Keys seal The Fact for all time :

1) : Vast "dinosaur" graveyards, fossilised rapidly in
tangled and contorted masses consistent with sudden
death by drowning, including fish fossilised giving birth.

2) : Huge beds of fossilised giant clams found in the peak
regions of mountain ranges, having died suddenly, yet in
the "closed position". Clam shells open in death. The
closed fossils, also so high up, reveal the clams were
suddenly buried after being caught up in vast
subterranean uplifting water currents in order to
arrive at their final lofty resting places.

3) : Confirmed 20th century evidence proves that
fossils form very quickly, when the conditions are
right, namely carbon being replaced by minerals
to form stone replicas of the original lifeforms.
"Being turned into stone" is fossilisation, the
deluged fate of a multitude of Adamic era
creatures during the 12 month flood period.
The creatures that were not buried rotted into
oblivion, or were eaten by water habitat predators
that did not need to be on board the Ark and
survived the titanic mountains of erosion debris
that gradually settled and dried, concrete-style,
into the layers being excavated today - indeed.

4) : The so called geologic column is a myth
and does not exist in actual reality, because
mammalian skeletons have consistently been
found in layers below "dinosaurs". Those that
have been found in the uppermost layers, including
birds were simply smarter, and survived the
longest by climbing higher, or kept flying until they
finally died by drowning and were likewise buried.

5) : "Stone" fossils cannot be carbon dated, and, as
such are never carbon dated. The fossils are dated
by the layers they are found in : Index Fossils.
Guess how the layers are dated? By the Index
Fossils. Guess how the time related indices have
occurred? A 19th century German Atheist made
it all up to get rid of God out of the Big Picture.
This is clearly proved when the layers are studied,
because there are no water erosion channels,
such as rivers or suchlike; the layers are stacked
like pancakes, with the heavier, lower dwelling,
often dumber creatures at the bottom - gravity.

6) : A well known character of water and gravel
physics, has proved that moving water, thick
with deposits, sand, gravel and dead creatures
of different sizes will automatically arrange
into layers with heavier cadavers at the bottom
and lighter ones at the top. The same is true,
on average, when God's concrete layers are
studied, containing skeletal Flood evidence.

7) : The shapes of the continents are mapped by
Ocean water levels only. Differences in height or
depth create entirely new maps. This alone
destroys a Pangea theory. The continents have
not been drifting apart for millions of years;
they are delineated by the Ocean level only.
The Ocean is the vast residue of The Flood;
before The Flood there were Seas, plural.

8) : Take a look at these pictures of fossilised
trees piercing multiple layers. The same thing
occurred at Spirit Lake when Mount St Helens
exploded. Trees floating in the lake upended
by the heavier root or branch masses sank
straight down vertically and pierced the soft
sediment layers at the bottom of Spirit Lake.
Thousands of such fossilised trees have
been discovered at huge depths piercing
multiple layers of rock. These layers are
simply hardened mud and flood debris
seams : Noah's "Concrete" Evidence.

9) : The Grand Canyon itself is self evident proof
of a gargantuan flood of water. It is impossible
for that vast Canyon to have been cut by the
tiny Colorado River. If those layers were really
evidence of vast epochs of time related deposits,
where are the dried out creeks in each layer?
What, it didn't rain whilst the layers were formed?
It is obvious those layers went down in one
creative event, The Flood : Not over eons of time.

If you have been conned and deceived into thinking
the layers and the fossils are evidence of Evolution,
get angry - you have been outsmarted by Satan.
It's ALL clever fiction. The Great Flood In Noah's
Day caused the entire fossil record, GLOBALLY.
If you continue believing this and denying God
and The Holy Bible Historical Record The
Devil OWNS you and you WILL go to Hell.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was the British Queen Cleopatra!!

Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was the British Queen Cleopatra. Amazingly, like her Egyptian counterpart, she was also the mother of twins. Queen Cleopatra was an adept at using poison and Margaret was a chemistry major at Oxford. That knowledge was very useful to her in getting rid of anybody who blocked her political career. (Her mother Beatrice died "unexpectedly" in 1960).

Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was the British Cleopatra. Amazingly, she also had a boy and girl twin, in the very same year that Elizabeth and Lilibet began their reigns.

Queen Cleopatra bewitched the 2 most powerful men in the ancient world: Julius Caesar and Marcus Antonius.

Thatcher had Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev eating out of her hands.

[...]

The British Cleopatra made sure that Bergoglio did not become Pope in 2005!!

The "Iron Lady" did not earn that nickname for nothing. She might be called "Attila the Hen" in jest, but nobody crossed her and came out ahead.

In February 2001, the ailing Pope John Paul II made Bergoglio a cardinal.

He also named Bergoglio as his successor.

In March 2005, Cardinal Bergoglio was absolutely sure he would be the first Jesuit Pope.

He would have taken the name Pius XIII.

Before the conclave, "anonymous" distributed damning evidence of his complicity in the "Dirty War." "Anonymous" is just a synonym for the British Secret Service:

No one admitted to sending the email. The ambassador said he did not do it. So did the lawyer. So did the journalist. So did several high ranking officials of the Society of Jesus, the world's biggest and most powerful religious order. The dossier that dropped anonymously in the inbox of senior cardinals as they gathered at Rome was damning. Or so it was intended to be. Someone did not want Jorge Mario Bergoglio to be Pope. (Vallely, Pope Francis: Untying the Knots, p. 1).

Even though the " Iron Lady" was out of office since 1990, she was still hugely influential in governmental circles. They all remembered the Falklands War, and they were not about to have any Argentine as Pope.

A Titanic battle raged at the Vatican between the Jesuits and the other factions.

Finally, in March 2013, Joseph Ratzinger, aka Pope Benedict XVI, was forced to resign.

The outcome was never in doubt as Jorge Bergoglio finally achieved his lifelong ambition and became Pope Francis

After an intense struggle that lasted from 2005 to 2013, Bergoglio finally forced Pope Benedict XVI to resign. Only a month later, the woman who torpedoed Bergoglio in 2005 was sent to meet her Maker.

The British Cleopatra was sent to meet her Maker in April 2013

The very next month after Bergoglio became Pope on the second try, the British Cleopatra had an unexpected demise. It is true that she was 87, but she had an iron constitution, and an iron will, and the only person who could have prevented her from living lucidly to 100 was her physician.

She always had extraordinary energy, and seldom needed more than 4 hours sleep per night. She was as driven to restore the British Empire as her Egyptian counterpart was driven to restore the grandeur of Pharaonic Egypt.

Even at 87, the "Iron Lady" was still a formidable force in politics.

Her death on April 9, 2013, was very timely indeed.

Incredibly, the ancient Egyptians abhorred the Roman practice of cremation.

Queen Cleopatra had an elaborate tomb built to house her mortal remains.

Queen Cleopatra committed suicide, but she had an elaborate tomb prepared to house her mortal remains with her lover, Marcus Antonius. By delaying the Papacy of Bergoglio until 2013, the "Iron Lady" did the Christian world a great service.

Pope Francis will be arrested for war crimes if he returns to Argentina!!

As Jesuit Provincial in Argentina, Jorge Bergoglio was head of the Militia of Jesus, and therefore all the leaders of the junta reported to him.

When the junta finally fell in December 1983, the house of horrors that was Argentina began to be revealed.

Mass graves were unearthed all over the country, but the great majority of the desaparecidos were buried at sea.

That is why Pope Francis cannot set foot in his homeland.

The last book of the Holy Bible says that the sea will give up all the dead on the Last Day:

And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to his works (Revelation 20:13).

If Pope Francis does not return to Argentina and face a court there, he will still have to attend the Judgment Seat of Christ on the Last Day (II Corinthians 5:10).

Welcome To Bamsterdam #fundie npr.org

it might rain copious amounts of water but it won't stay on the mountain as ice and it will all run down at once...."

Taking your statement at face value it would seem that, given the decades of advance warning of such a scenario, reservoirs could be built to reserve the fresh water for human use before it goes to the sea. Such reservoirs were built all over the semi-desert landscape of California back in the mid-20th century before the State Gov't was taken over by envirowackos and today such reservoirs are the State's main bulwark in contending with the drought even though the population has doubled.

... and the "science" to which you refer is the doomsday scenario promulgated by grant-grubbing researchers who are paid by governments to recommend increases in taxation and centralized government power. 'Nuff said.

So various watermelon groups "cited Legates' ties to several groups that have supported or emphasized skeptical stands on climate change while they also received regular contributions from ExxonMobil..." (!)

Oh, I get -- Legates has "ties" to "several groups" who received "regular
contributions from ExxonMobil" so he is - voila! - guilty by association ! If you can add to your argumentum ad hominem by saying he has been "linked" to such groups, you might have good job prospects as a MSM newsreader.

"But when scientists brought the mayor a map plainly showing that much of Coral Gables would be underwater in a few decades...."

Hallelujah !! Scientists finally found something useful to do with all that federal grant money by inventing a "map" that can foretell the future. (And all this time I've had to rely on palm-reading by Madame Zhuzhu at the county fair.)
Where can I get a copy of one of these maps so I can find out who's going to win the World Series before Las Vegas bookies do ? ... and find out where the S&P 500 Index is going to be at the end of the year ?

All limousine liberal movie moguls who are members of the Climate Change Cult should prove their belief in globull warming by trading me their 20 million dollar Malibu beach home for my little bungalow that is safely 600 feet ASL.

Robo #conspiracy s15.invisionfree.com

[On 9/11 flight 93]

Is it even physically possible that a plane travelling hundreds of mph will hit sand and "tunnel right in" without leaving any debris above ground? If a plane crashes on the soft beach sand, does it "tunnel in", or does it break into pieces?

I think that can ruled out.

jesusfreak2 #fundie christiandiscussionforums.org

I have my opinions and you will not change them. I used to be a pro-abort non-believin' hedonistic agnostic. I know exactly how atheists think. I certainly have known enough of them. I was NOT raised in Church and was not influenced to believe in God at all by my parents.

I also said that atheists who WRITE CHECKS TO THE ACLU are supporting an organization that supports and defends child rapists and murderers using sophistical arguments about what "free speech" is. As an atheist, you should denounce the ACLUE for that ALONE. Instead, we have endless pontificating on this board, IN THIS THREAD about the virtuous ACLU. What a bunch of bunk. The truth is ugly and it hurts, but debating with you or getting into some kind of gutter argument debate about what atheists believe will NOT change my opinion of atheists or their belief system that is built on sinking sand.

Have a nice weekend.

Mario Seiglie #fundie ucg.org

Can we prove that evolution is false without using the Bible? Certainly we can! Evolution is a scientific theory that stands or falls on the physical evidence. In fact, one can be an atheist, a person who doesn’t believe in God, and still not believe in evolution!

Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, as taught at school, is a biological explanation of how creatures have supposedly “evolved” or developed progressively through natural selection and variation (now known as mutation) over eons of time from the tiny cell to the largest creatures on earth today. What is taught in classrooms is not mere micro evolution—small changes within a species—but macro evolution, the change from one type of creature to another quite distinct life form.

What many evolutionists are trying to convince you of is that there is no need for a Creator since, as they say, evolution can substitute as the mechanism for creating and transforming life. They teach that life arose from non-life and evolved from simpler creatures to more complex life forms. In other words, the tiny cell eventually became an amoeba, then a lizard, then a monkey, and finally— you !

In order to remember key points that disprove Darwinian evolution—the “molecules to man” theory—we’ll use the acronym FALSE. (A few of these points also disprove the compromise of theistic evolution—the notion that God employed macroevolution over eons in forming the creatures we see on earth today.)

A fossil is the preserved remains of a living thing. The fossil record around the earth extends an average of one mile deep. Below this level we come up with a blank slate as far as living, complex creatures are concerned.

I collect fossils of what are deemed the earliest type of complex creatures with hard bodies—trilobites. No previous ancestors of these arthropods have been found. Similar to some marine “bugs” we see today on the seashore that disappear into the sand when the waves retreat, trilobites had hard shells, all the basic organs, and complex eyes like those of flies, with hundreds of sophisticated lenses connected to the optic nerve going to the brain. Trilobite fossils are found around the earth, and in all cases the level of rock beneath them does not reveal other creatures with similar features.

As one source states: “The dominant life form was the now-extinct sea creature known as a trilobite, up to a foot long, with a distinctive head and tail, a body made up of several parts, and a complex respiratory system. But although there are many places on earth where 5,000 feet of sedimentary rock stretch unbroken and uniformly beneath the Cambrian [layer], not a single indisputable multi-celled fossil has been found there. It is ‘the enigma of paleontological [fossil studies] enigmas,’ according to Stephen Gould. Darwin himself said he could give ‘no satisfactory answer’ to why no fossils had been discovered. Today’s scientists are none the wiser” (Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe , 1982, pp. 26-27).

Question: If, after almost two centuries of digging beneath all the world’s continents, no previous ancestor of this first hard-bodied creature has been found, how then did the ubiquitous trilobite evolve? There should be some previous ancestor if evolution were true.

It’s like finding an exquisite watch on the seashore and yet never finding any previous primitive models of the watch on earth. If you reasoned as an evolutionist, you would deny there was a need for a watchmaker at all, maintaining that time, water, sand, minerals and actions of the elements are sufficient to producing a fully functional watch that runs. This is part of the reason it takes more faith to believe in evolution than in a Creator!

Further important evidence from the fossil record is the absence of transitional forms between species. Darwin was concerned that the thousands of intermediate stages between creatures needed to prove his theory were not in evidence, but he expected they would eventually be found. Yet those thousands of missing transitional forms are still missing!

Another reference explains: “If throughout past ages life was actually drifting over in one continual stream from one form to another, it is to be expected that as many samples of the intermediate stages between species should be discovered in fossil condition as of the species themselves … All should be in a state of flux. But these missing links are wanting. There are no fossils of creatures whose scales were changing into feathers or whose feet were changing into wings, no fossils of fish getting legs or of reptiles getting hair. The real task of the geological evolutionist is not to find ‘the’ missing link, as if there were only one. The task is to find those thousands upon thousands of missing links that connect the many fossil species with one another” (Byron Nelson, After Its Kind , 1970, pp. 60-62).

The absence of transitional forms is an insurmountable hurdle for theistic evolutionists as well. It also fits with our next point.

When there is no real evidence, evolutionary scientists simply make assumptions.

If evolution were true, then where is the evidence of different types of animals now “evolving” into other types? Where is the evidence of cats, dogs and horses gradually turning into something else? We do see changes within species, but we do not see any changes into other species. And, as mentioned, we see no evidence of gradual change in the fossil record either. Yet evolutionists continue to assume that transitional forms must have existed.

In Darwin’s landmark book On the Origin of Species there are some 800 subjective clauses, with uncertainty repeatedly admitted instead of proof. Words such as “could,” “perhaps” and “possibly” plague the entire book.

Evolution is still called a theory—a possible explanation or assumption—because it is not testable according to the scientific method, as this would require thousands or millions of years. Evolutionists will counter that a theory is not a mere hypothesis but is a widely affirmed intellectual construct that generally appears to fit all the facts. Yet evolution in no way fits all the facts available. Evidence does not support it—and in many respects runs counter to it.

The law of biogenesis as taught in biology class states that only life can produce life.

You’ve probably heard the famous question: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? It’s a real dilemma for an evolutionist to answer. An egg comes from a chicken, yet the chicken comes from an egg. How can there be one without the other?

To complicate matters even more, the chicken has to come from a fertilized egg that has the mixture of two different genetic strains from both its parents. So the problem of the origin of life and initial reproduction is still a mystery that evolutionary science cannot adequately answer.

Yet for someone who believes in special creation by a Creator, there is no dilemma here. First God made the male and female chickens, which produced the first fertilized egg—and the rest is history.

When one living thing needs another different living thing to survive, it’s called a symbiotic relationship.

A good example of this is the relationship between bees and flowers. The bees need the nectar from some types of flowers to feed while these flowers need bees to pollinate them. Both depend on each other to exist and survive. The question for evolutionists is: How did these plants exist without the bees, and how did the bees exist without these plants?

Again, atheistic scientists are stumped. Theistic evolutionists are perplexed as well. Yet if you believe in a Creator who specially created the various forms of life on earth, the answer is simple—both were created at about the same time.

All living things are exquisitely engineered or designed. Qualitatively, a bacterium is as majestically built for its purpose as a human body is for its function. Yet evolution says it’s only an illusion of design—that there is no real designer behind it. Reality is not an illusion! Living things are multi-functional, which means they do many complex things at the same time, something evolution with its step-by-step process has never been able to demonstrate.

One example of a living thing with exquisite engineering is the tree. It provides breathable oxygen for us while processing carbon dioxide, which would in high amounts in the air be toxic to us. It supplies wood, housing for birds, roots to limit erosion, fruit and seeds to eat, is biodegradable and gives shade. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, “A healthy tree provides a cooling effect that is equivalent to 10 room-size air conditioners operating 20 hours a day.” How could something so complex arise from a random, undirected evolutionary process?

Again, you need more “faith” to believe in blind evolution than in an all-knowing Creator who designed the marvelous tree in the first place.

Now you have five proofs that evolution is F-A-L-S-E and that special creation is true—and we didn’t even use the Bible. Remember the acronym FALSE when you read or hear about evolution—and do take time to read our Creator’s great book of truth! It has much to say regarding origins.

Levelwater #fundie geocities.com

Many people around the world worship the e=mc[^]2 formula and worship Einstein for that formula which says that the energy produced by an amount of gold is the same energy produced by the same amount of lead: Al last, the lead become gold, the old dream of the Alchemists!. With 1 gram of sand one can produce the energy that produce 1 gram of Uranium!. Isn't that marvelous?

In his letter to President Roosevelt - August 1939, Einstein clearly shows that the above formula is just a fraud, he didn't encouraged Roosevelt to use water, sand, garbage or paper, but just the very specific element URANIUM:

S. M. Campbell #fundie fpchurch.org.uk

Just over three years ago there was great excitement when geologists in Canada discovered volcanic rocks which they considered to be about 4 billion years old. This made them, apparently, the oldest rocks in the earth. In the news a couple of years ago much attention was given to the small human being found in Indonesia and described as a “Hobbit”; it was said to be about 18,000 years old. At the end of last year there was an article on the BBC website about the fossilised trail of a giant scorpion found in Scotland, in rocks supposed to be about 330 million years old. About a month ago the BBC reported on a fossil of a beaver-like creature found in China. It was estimated to be about 164 million years old.

Scientists want to know how old things are because they think they can then get closer to answering the question, How old is the Earth? The answer is relatively straightforward. By considering the history of the world, starting at creation week in Genesis and going right through the Bible to the present, the age of the earth has been calculated to be about 6,000 years.

Why then is the age of fossils and rocks, or the age of the Earth, given in tens of thousands, millions or even billions of years, as in the examples at the start of this article? The main reason for this drive to make the age of the Earth so large is that evolutionists need huge periods of time in order to have any hope of their ideas working out. In previous articles we looked at natural selection and mutations. According to evolutionists, billions of years are required to give time for all the supposed mutations in simple organisms to occur and for natural selection to work on them to produce, at last, complex organisms. So evolutionists conclude that the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old.

Evolutionary scientists assume lots of theories to be true when they develop the tests they use to try to work out the age of things; they use these tests to piece together their ideas about when the universe came into existence. Carbon dating is one of these tests. However, it is less than reliable.

Carbon dating works on the basis that a radioactive form of carbon (carbon 14) decays over time. When scientists want to find the age of an object, they test to find out the percentage of radioactive carbon in it and compare it with the percentage of the other form of carbon (carbon 12). They then work out how long it would have taken for the radioactive carbon to fall to that level compared with the current levels of radioactive carbon in the atmosphere. The older the object is, the smaller the percentage of radio active carbon, because this means that there has been more time for the radioactive carbon to decay.

The main difficulty with this method of testing is that it assumes that the level of radioactive carbon in the atmosphere has been constant. But it is more than likely that this was not the case. For instance, the burning of fossil fuels since the Industrial Revolution in the eighteenth century would lower the percentage of radioactive carbon. The testing of atomic bombs in the 1950s would increase the level. There would also have been significant changes in the atmosphere after the Genesis flood.

Indeed many results from carbon dating have turned out to be seriously flawed. For instance, some mortar taken from a section of an Oxford castle built about 800 years ago was dated by this method at 7,370 years. Shells from living snails in Nevada were carbon-dated at 2,700 years old. And a seal which had recently died appeared to be 1,300 years old when it was tested in this way.

Evolutionists resort to the usual excuses, claiming exceptional circumstances; they state that they are aware of the problems and take them into account when they are doing their calculations. One professor who believes in evolution went so far as to say, “If a carbon-14 date supports our theories we put it in the main text. If it does not entirely contradict them, we put it in a footnote. And if it is completely ‘out of date’, we just drop it.”

But there is scientific evidence which fits in with the timeframe of biblical creation. This evidence supports the 6,000 years of the Bible rather than the evolutionist’s billions of years. A few of these evidences are listed in the rest of this article, but there are many others.

It has been found that processes relating to rocks and fossils do not need thousands or millions of years, in spite of what evolutionists claim. There are many examples of stalactites and stalagmites being formed in short periods of time, in spite of what evolutionists claim. In a cave in New Mexico a dead bat fell on a stalagmite. It was cemented into the stalagmite showing that the stalagmite grew faster than the bat decomposed. Researchers at laboratories in Chicago have produced high-grade black coal by mixing wood, water and clay at 150 degrees Celsius for several weeks – not thousands of years! Some people think it takes millions of years to form opal, but one Australian researcher makes it himself by mixing the right chemicals together.

The continents are eroding quickly. If they truly were billions of years old there would be nothing left of them today – assuming, of course, that the rate of erosion did not change much. From this erosion, which has supposedly been happening for billions of years, you would expect the mud on the seafloor to be several kilometres thick, choking up the oceans. Instead it is only 400 metres deep. Henry Morris, who wrote the book, The Genesis Flood, studied the amount of salt in the oceans. He discovered that there was much less salt and other minerals than would be expected if they had been added to the oceans at the same rate for billions of years.

There is also the fact that the population of the world is small enough to fit into the biblical timeframe. The number of people is much smaller than you would expect if you believed evolutionary ideas of when mankind first appeared and if you take into account the way the population is growing.

So evolutionists cannot produce scientific evidence which proves the age which they claim for the Earth. Nor can creationists produce evidence that is so definite that no one can argue against it. But we do have the firm basis of the Word of God, and the evidence that exists fits easily into that framework. God is eternal; He has always existed and always will. And we are to praise Him for this, knowing that “before the mountains were brought forth, or ever Thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting, Thou art God” (Psalm 90:2).

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy truthernews.wordpress.com

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Although the apartheid State of Israel has been touted as the “First Jewish State” since its official inception in 1949, the evidence detailed herein confirms beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Central European country of Switzerland was in-fact the first Jewish State.

While this fact has remained hidden since Switzerland was secretly founded in 1309, it has now been exposed for all the world to see. Consequently, it’s highly likely that I, David Chase Taylor, will be targeted for assassination, kidnapping or arrest for alleged antisemitism or other crimes this December of 2016.

According to the Encyclopaedia Judaica, the first documentation of Jews living in Switzerland dates back to 1214, roughly 95-years prior to the secret formation of Switzerland in 1309. In other words. Switzerland was home to Jews even prior to its official formation as a country.

This notion was reiterated by Wikipedia which states that the “History of the Jews in Switzerland reaches back at least a thousand years. Jews and Judaism have been present in the territory of what is now Switzerland since before the emergence of the medieval Old Swiss Confederacy in the 15th century”.

As revealed in the shocking book entitled “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014), Greenland is home to the one and only Greco-Roman Empire. Consequently, the Jewish people act at the behest of the Greco-Romans which is confirmed in-part by the fact that 90% of Roman holidays are Jewish holidays.

That is why the Jews are “God’s Chosen People” because the term “G.O.D.” is an acronym for “Greenland of Denmark”, the official name of Greenland. In other words, the Jews are “Greenland of Denmark’s chosen people” for they were specifically chosen by the Greco-Romans to rule the Underworld in their absence.

1. Jewish Symbololgy of Switzerland
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that the country of Switzerland is rife with Jewish symbology. Firstly, the flag of Switzerland contains four “Up Tack” symbols (i.e., “?”), otherwise known as the Hebrew letter entitled “U+FB29”. In order to hide this secret association, Jewish tradition was altered in the 19th century to write the “+”symbol as an inverted “T” symbol. Coincidentally, like the flag of Switzerland, four “Up Tack” symbols are found within the seal of the Society of Jesus (see photo above) which is mainly composed of Jews. Secondly, the Latin name of Switzerland as well as its country code is “CH” (i.e., ISO 3166-2:CH) which is consonantly speaking the same as “Chai” (C+H), a sacred Jewish symbol meaning “Life” or “Life Force”. In the medieval Kabbalah, Chai is the lowest (closest to the physical plane) emanation of God (i.e., Greenland of Denmark). That is because Switzerland’s primary role is to keep the Greco-Roman Empire safe which is exactly why it’s home to CIA Headquarters (see below). The acronym “CH” (i.e., Confoederatio Helvetica) numerically equates to the number “38” which is the addition of “19+19” or “S+S” which is consonantly speaking the same as Suisse (S+S), the original name of Switzerland. Lastly, because Switzerland was the first Jewish state, scores of Swiss cities feature the Jewish Star of David on their respective coat of arms (e.g., Aesch, Binningen, Birsfelden, Brig-Glis, Erlach, Glarus, Glarus Nord, Huttwil, Maienfeld, Meilen, Montreux, Ostermundigen, Rheinfelden, Sarnen, Spreitenbach, Volketswil, Wettingen, Zollikon, etc.).

2. Switzerland Home to CIA Headquarters
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it is home to the one and only Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). As originally depicted in the March 31, 2015, Truther.org report entitled “10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA”, evidence now confirms that Switzerland is in fact harboring the CIA. Exactly where CIA Headquarters was located within Switzerland remained a mystery until September 17, 2015, when Truther.org revealed that CERN is the secret entrance to CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva. That is why the thorny-like cross found in the logo of the CIA is reflected in: a) the seal of Geneva, Switzerland, b) the seal of the Society of Jesus whose Jesuits evidently run the CIA; and c) the thorny-like ring shape of the Lord Shiva Statue at CERN, entrance to CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geveva. Because Switzerland and her CIA’s job is to “sift” or “Siv” (i.e., Shiva) out potential threats to the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland, she is worshiped above all, namely through the likeness of Jesus (see below), the modern characterization of ISIS. In Judaism, Shiva is the name for the week-long mourning period after death which is derived from the Hebrew word “shiv’ah” which literally means “seven”. Consequently, the name of Shiva is intimately associated with Israel, Jews and Judaism, namely: a) Arutz Sheva, the name of an Israeli media network identifying with Religious Zionism; b) “Sh’va”, the name for the “20(2)” decimal in the Jewish Gematria’s “Mispar gadol; c) Shva, Hebrew niqqud vowel sign written as two vertical dots underneath a letter; d) Yeshiva, a Jewish institution that focuses on the study of traditional religious texts such as the Talmud; e) Yeshiva University, a private university with four campuses in New York City; and f) Yeshiva.co, a Jewish website which is part of the institutions of Yeshivat Beit El. Lastly, the notion that the CIA is Jewish in origin was foreshadowed by the television series entitled “Homeland” (2011-Present) which features the Jewish character of Saul Berenson (Mandy Patinkin) as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Since art imitates life, real-life Directors of the CIA have also been of Jewish ethnicity, namely John M. Deutch who served from May 10, 1995 until December 15, 1996.

3. Switzerland Home to Society of Jesus
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that the city of Geneva, Switzerland is home to the Society of Jesus, a strictly male order of the Roman Catholic Church whose members are called Jesuits. The Jesuits are engaged in what they call evangelization in 112 nations on 6 continents, boasting Jesuit colleges and universities in over 100 nations around the world. In Eugène Sue’s best-selling book entitled “Le Juif errant” (1844), or “The Wandering Jew” in English, she states that the Jesuits are a “secret society bent on world domination by all available means”. Considering that Jesus Christ was of Jewish ethnicity, it stands to reason that the Society of Jesus is also Jewish. Although the Society of Jesus was purportedly founded in the General Curia of Rome, Italy via a Papal Bull from Pope Paul III on September 27, 1540, the seal of the Jesuits is found on the original flag and seal of Geneva, Switzerland. The thorny-like seal of the Jesuits is reflected in the Sacred Heart symbol which represents the most widely practiced and well-known Roman Catholic devotions, taking Jesus Christ’s physical heart as the representation of His divine love for humanity. The “physical heart” is representative Switzerland which itself is shaped like a heart (see below). Due to the inherently Jewish nature of Roman Catholic Orders, the term “Jesuit” was likely derived from the terms “Jew Suits”. Similar to playing cards, different suits serve different purposes as each suit or respective order is compartmentalized (i.e., not knowing what the other is doing and for what purpose). In short, it appears that the Jesuits are the military order of the Roman Empire who routinely carry out assassinations, conduct espionage, stage terror attacks and trigger wars. According to the book entitled “Vatican Assassins” by Eric Jon Phelps, the man responsible for ordering these nefarious deeds is none other than the “Black Pope“, the Jesuit Superior General. This notion is essentially confirmed by Wikipedia which states that “The Superior General of the Society of Jesus is the official title of the leader of the Society of Jesus—the Roman Catholic religious order, also known as the Jesuits. He is generally addressed as Father General. The position sometimes carries the nickname of the Black Pope…”. It is imperative to note that the Black Pope is the unseen hand of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland who retains command and control of the Underworld via CIA Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. The title of the “Black” Pope is self-evident for he is never seen, always remaining in the dark.

4. Switzerland is Jesus (Suisse is ISIS)
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it is home to the the Society of Jesus (i.e., the Society of ISIS) in Geneva, Switzerland. In Latin, the name of the “Society of Jesus” is “Societas Iesu”. This is because the name “Iesu” (S+S) was originally derived from the Greco-Roman goddess of “ISIS” (S+S), the patroness of witchcraft and magic. Consequently, the seal of the Society of Jesus contains the letters “IHS”. Because the letter “I” was formerly an “S” in the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet), the seal of the Jesuits can also be read as “SHS”. Since the letter “H” in the Roman Score is pronounced “Ch” or “Chi”, meaning “Life Force”, the seal of the Jesuits can be read as “ISIS Chi” or “Chi ISIS”, meaning “ISIS is life” or “Life is ISIS”. That is why ISIS (i.e., Jesus) is worshipped above all other gods for the very life of the Greco-Roman Empire depends on it. Consequently, the goddess of ISIS (S+S) is consonantly speaking the same as “Suisse” (S+S), the original name of Switzerland. That is why Jesus is routinely depicted with the Sacred Heart (see above photo) which coincidentally contains a Swiss cross burning above a heart that is wrapped in thorns. The heart is symbolic of the country of Switzerland which itself is shaped in the form of an actual heart. The thorns are indicative of the aforementioned Society of Jesus (whose seal contains thorns in the form of Sun rays and spikes), as well as the CIA (whose logo contains cross flanked by thorny spikes). The name of “Jesus” (J+S+S), which may be an acronym that is pronounced as “Jew ISIS”, is consonantly speaking quite similar to Esus (S+S) and Hesus (H+S+S), a Celtic god worshiped in Scotland which coincidentally mirrors the Greco-Roman goddess of ISIS (S+S). That is why 18th century Druidic revivalist Iolo Morgannwg identified Esus (S+S) with Jesus (J+S+S) based on the strength of the similarity of their respective names. The Ichthys, a basic symbol consisting of two intersecting arcs that resemble the profile of a fish, was reportedly used as a Christian symbol in the first decades of the 2nd century. Its popularity among Christians was allegedly due to the fact that the five initial letters of the Greek word for fish (ICHTHYS) describes the character of Christ: “Iesous Christos Theou Yios Soter” (??s??? ???st??, Te?? ????, S?t??), meaning “Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior”. In other words, “Iesous” (S+S) was the first word to describe the deity that is now called Jesus. The Catholic Church corroborated this notion a few hundred years later when Pope John Paul II published a declaration on August 6, 2000, officially declaring that the title of Dominus Iesus means “The Lord Jesus” in English. Although the vowels have been changed (the former alphabet known as the Roman Score did not contain vowels), the consonant letters of “S” and “S” stay the same. In other words, Iesus (S+S) is the official name of Jesus according to the Catholic Church who not only wrote the Holy Bible but are admittedly the “sole Church of Christ” according to the Nicene Creed. Naturally therefore, they have the final word on the official name of Jesus. Consequently the worship of Esus, Hesus, Iesous, Iesus or Jesus is the unintentional worship of the Greco-Roman goddess of ISIS. Lastly, the main progenitor and propagator of Jesus (i.e., ISIS) is non-other than the Roman Catholic Church whose Pope is protected by the Swiss Guard. That is why the flag of Switzerland and the flag of Vatican City boast the only square sovereign-state flags in the world, making them the only two sovereign nations on Earth. In other words, Switzerland and Vatican City rule the entire world. The notion that Switzerland is Greco-Roman in origin is corroborated by the fact that a Greek Cross adorns the flag of Switzerland. The notion that the Jews are acting at the behest of the Greco-Roman Empire is corroborated by the fact that the Jews wear a Yamaka or Kippah (i.e., a Roman Catholic Zucchetto) which symolize the Roman Dome found in virtually every city on Earth. Although these caps tend to vary in color, the Kippah and the Zucchetto are symbolic of the Greco-Roman’s domination (i.e., dome) over humanity, mostly due to their horrific use and abuse of the Jewish race.

5. Jewish Immigration to Switzerland via Scotland
Although Aristotle claimed that the Jews originally emanated from India where they were known as the “Kalan” (C/K+L+N), a term which is consonantly speaking is the same as “clan” (C/K+L+N), evidence now suggests Jews originally immigrated to Switzerland via the Isle of Ewe in Scotland. According to Wikipedia, “The earliest date at which Jews arrived in Scotland is not known. It is possible that Jews visited Scotland at the time of the Roman Empire‘s conquest of southern Britain, but there are no records of this”. This is likely because the history of the Jews in Scotland is secret and has therefore been erased from the history books. Since the term “Ewe” is alternatively pronounced “Yew” (\'yü\) as in “Jew” (\'jü\), there are two competing theories about the meaning of the island’s name. Either it was derived from the Old Irish “eo” meaning “yew tree”, a possible reference to the lineage of the Jewish race which was spawned from the island, and/or it was derived from the Gaelic “eubh” meaning “echo” for the island was responsible for echoing Greco-Roman policy in the Underworld. Interestingly, the term “clan” is defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as: a) a Celtic group especially in the Scottish Highlands comprising a number of households whose heads claim descent from a common ancestor, b) a group of people tracing descent from a common ancestor, and c) a group united by a common interest or common characteristics. Although only conjecture, this is likely where the Scottish Rite (i.e., Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry) was originally derived from. Consequently, the links between the Jesuits and their Society of Jesus now headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland and the Scottish Rite are unmistakable. According to C. Lenning’s “Encyclopedia of Freemasonry” (c. 1822), King James II of England resided at the Jesuit College of Clermont in Paris where his followers “fabricated certain degrees [of Freemasonry] for the purpose of carrying out their political ends”. The boot-shaped Isle of Ewe, the boot-shaped Swiss canton of Bern, as well as the boot-shaped building of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland, are all a tribute to the original boot of Italy which is a tribute (no pun intended) to the boot of the Greco-Roman Empire which has been placed on the collective throat of humanity, namely through the use of fiat currency and theh practice of usury. This is likely where the terms “bank” and “banks” were originally derived from for gold and silver was delivered to the “banks” of the Isle of Ewe by the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland. This notion is corroborated by the coat of arms of the Isle of Ewe which depicts a U-shaped Greco-Roman Clipper ship. Lastly, the term “I love you”, possibly the most famous three words ever spoken, were evidently derived from the Isle of Ewe which sounds like “I love you” when pronounced. The term “I Love You” could also mean “I Leave Jew” for the Greco-Roman Empire chose to leave the Jews to rule the Underworld in their absence.

6. Switzerland Home to First Zionist Congress
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it was home to the First Zionist Congress which was held in Basel, Switzerland from August 29, 1897, until August 31, 1897. Since then, Switzerland has been home to 15 out of 22 Zionist congresses. The First Zionist Congress was the inaugural congress of the Zionist Organization (ZO) which later became the World Zionist Organization (WZO) in 1960. The founder and chairman of the inaugural event was Theodor Herzl who wrote in his diary on September 3, 1897, that “Were I to sum up the Basel Congress in a word – which I shall guard against pronouncing publicly – it would be this: At Basel I founded the Jewish State. If I said this out loud today l would be greeted by universal laughter. In five years perhaps, and certainly in fifty years, everyone will perceive it”. Needless to say, the creation of the alleged “First Jewish State” of Israel in Switzerland was a colossal hoax designed in-part to sell the fraudulent notion that Switzerland was not in fact the first Jewish State.

7. Switzerland Home to World Jewish Congress
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it is home to the one and only World Jewish Congress (WJC) which was founded in August of 1936 in Geneva, Switzerland, home to the aforementioned CIA and Society of Jesus. According to its mission statement, the World Jewish Congress’ main purpose is to act as “the diplomatic arm of the Jewish people”. Consequently, the WJC has special consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council. The main aims of the organization are to create “a worldwide Jewish representative body based on the concept of the unity of the Jewish people, democratically organized and able to act on matters of common concern”. Exactly what role the WJC plays in international politics is not known, but the fact that it is never discussed publicly on radio or television suggests that it plays a vital role.

8. Switzerland Home to Jewish Intellectuals
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it has long been a haven for Jewish intellectuals. In other words, Jews have always felt safe living in Switzerland. Russian Jew Chaim Weizmann stated in his diary from 1898 that “If Russian Jewry was the cradle of my Zionism, the Western universities were my finishing schools. The first of these schools was Berlin, with its Russian-Jewish society; the second was Berne, the third Geneva, both in Switzerland”. In other words, Switzerland has played a vital role in the global propagation of Zionist ideology. Consequently, Switzerland has been home to a plethora of notebale Jews, namely: a) Georgi Valentinovich Plekhanov, a Marxist theoretician who founded the social-democratic movement in Russia before fleeing to Switzerland in 1880 where he continued trying to overthrow the Tsarist regime in Russia; b) Leon Trotsky, a Marxist revolutionary and theorist who studied law in Switzerland prior to becoming a Soviet politician and founding leader of the Red Army who engineered the transfer of all political power to the Soviets with the October Revolution of 1917; c) Albert Einstein, a noted physicist and peace activist who grew up in Switzerland, received his doctorate from Federal Polytechnic Academy in Zurich, and was employed by the Swiss patent office; d) Zev Jabotinsky, a “reporter” in the Swiss capital city of Bern for the Russian press and was elected as a Russian delegate to the Sixth Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland in 1903; and e) Ruth Dreifuss, the first-ever woman President of Switzerland from January 1, 1999, until January 1, 2000.

9. Switzerland Home to Global Banking System
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that it is home to the global banking establishment, which rightly or wrongly so, has been accused of being Jewish in nature. Due to the wealth attained by the Knights Templar (who originally founded Switzerland along with the Order of Saint John), Switzerland began to develop a massive economic infrastructure within Europe, creating financial techniques that became the earliest forms of banking. Although the primary mission of the Order was militarial in nature, only 10% of its members were actual combatants. In 1150, the Templars in Switzerland began generating letters of credit for pilgrims traveling to the Holy Land (i.e., Israel). In short, pilgrims deposited their valuables with a local Templar preceptory (bank) in Switzerland before leaving. In turn, they received an official document stating the value of their deposit. When they returned from the Holy Land, they would use said official document to retrieve their funds in an amount of treasure of equal value. This innovative arrangement was an early form of banking that eventually led to the formal system known today as checks. In time, the Templars established financial networks across the known world. They acquired large tracts of land, bought and managed farms and vineyards, built castles and churches, became involved in manufacturing, both import and export, and purchased their own fleet of ships. Consequently, the Order of the Knights Templar arguably became the world’s first multinational corporation. The Templars involvement in banking grew to the point where they began to practice usury, charging interest on money lent. According to a Templar researcher, “Since they weren’t allowed to charge interest, they charged rent instead”. Templar usury in Switzerland is evident today in Basel which is home to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the mother bank of all central banks. In short, the BIS creates money out of nothing and then charges countries (and their respective populations) interest on it, keeping them in a perpetual state of debt and economic slavery. Since interest rates can always be manipulated, no country can ever escape from their state of perpetual debt, no matter how hard they work. Admittedly “the world’s oldest international financial organization”, the BIS funds 60 central banks (e.g., Bank of China, Bank of England, Federal Reserve Bank, etc.), which collectively make up 95% of the world’s GDP (gross domestic product). Although the BIS bills itself as an international organization of central banks which attempts “to foster international cooperation in those areas and to act as a bank for central banks“, it is solely responsible for orchestrating the world’s financial crises simply due to the fact that it alone has the power to create fiat currency (i.e., “intrinsically valueless money used as money because of government decree”). In other words, the BIS is responsible for creating and distributing the world’s fiat money supply which is in turn used to fund the world’s respective governments, intelligence agencies and militaries, as well as the assassinations, terror attacks and wars they routinely engage in at the behest of the CIA. As the financial wing of the Central Intelligence Agency, the BIS is fiscally responsible for funding virtually all of the chaos and madness seen in our world today.

10. Israel Created as Political Cover for Switzerland
The notion that Switzerland was the first Jewish State is corroborated by the fact that Switzerland, more than any other country on Earth, was responsible for the creation of the State of Israel. After all, Israel was created in-part as political cover for Switzerland, the first Jewish State. According to the Swiss government, “The establishment of the State of Israel is closely linked with Switzerland”. That is why as of 2015, the Swiss community in Israel is the largest in the Asian region, totaling roughly 18,702 persons. This is also why Switzerland has represented Israel’s interests in numerous countries (i.e., Hungary (1967–1989), Guinea (1967–1973), Ceylon/Sri Lanka (1970–1976), Madagascar (1973–1994), Liberia (1973–1983) and Ghana (1973–2002)). Conversely, Switzerland has represented the interests of Iran (1958–1987) and the Ivory Coast (1973–1986) in Israel. The name of “Israel” was created using a combination of Greco-Roman gods and goddesses, namely Isis, Ra and El (i.e., IS-RA-EL). Consequently, the name of Israel contains the name of ISIS (S+S) which is consonantly speaking the same as Suisse (S+S), the original name of Switzerland. In order to draw attention away from Switzerland and her CIA, Israel was shaped in the form of a dagger, a modern tribute to the Sicarii and their terrorism committed at the behest of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland. The term Sicarii comes from the Latin word “Sica”, meaning “dagger”. Consequently, the Sicarii, or the “dagger men”, were Jews who carried out assassinations and murders with short daggers in crowded places before slipping away. They also committed attacks in villages which they raided, plundered and set on fire in order to create fear among those who acquiesced or collaborated with Roman rule. They also kidnapped notables as leverage for the release of their own members which were being held prisoner. In short, the Sicarii Jews were used to commit terror attacks in order to destabilize the Roman Empire after the 13 Bloodlines of Rome vacated to Greenland. Titus Flavius Josephus wrote the only account of the activities of the Sicarii, stating: “…a different type of bandits sprang up in Jerusalem, the so-called Sicarii, who murdered men in broad daylight in the heart of the city. Especially during the festivals they would mingle with the crowd, carrying short daggers concealed under their clothing, with which they stabbed their enemies. Then when they fell, the murderers would join in the cries of indignation and, through this plausible behavior, avoided discovery”.

Fedorable-Art #fundie deviantart.com

image
(Transscript:
Woman, asking two children in sandbox: "What are you two making?"
Child 1: "A wall for our sand castle".
_
Woman: "A wall!?! Don't you shitlords know walls are bad!?! Ugh, I need a safespace to escape this triggering!"
_
(sandbox and Child 1 have vanished)
Child 2: "If you hate walls, why do you need a safe space?"
_
(Woman unconscious on gurney in featureless void, with a trendy teenager and a doctor standing besides her)
Teenager: "I've never seen a triggering of this magnitude!"
Doctor: "We'll need to put her on a Tumblr IV ASAP.")

Don Boys #racist cstnews.com

They (Native Americans) had access to all the gold, silver, iron, water, trees, etc., that the white man had, yet it was the white man who built the greatest, most advanced society in the world. If that sounds like racism, so be it. It is also factual. Most Liberals don’t like facts; they like fantasy or faith in old, discredited theories that informed people discarded years ago.

If the white man had not beached his boats on the sands of Jamestown, Plymouth Rock, and Cape Cod, the Indians would still be huddled around their soot-lined tepees warming themselves over a fire made by rubbing dry sticks together. They would still be burying their dead children because of childhood diseases, and maybe the air would be cleaner if the white man had never come, but who would be alive to care?

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

Egyptian Pyramids
Aside from the fact that “Ancient Egypt” is an historical alias of the Greco-Roman Empire, Egyptian pyramids, which are allegedly the tombs of Egyptian Pharos, are built in the shape of the Chevron symbol (i.e., “?”), the most sacred symbol in the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet). Because the Egyptian pyramids are modeled after the Mesoamerican pyramids of South America, they are referred to as E-“gypt”-ian pyramids. The term “Egypt” (G+P+T) consonantly equates to “gypt”, meaning to steal or rip-off. Gypt is synonymous with “gypsies”, a people who have been historically depicted as traveling thieves. In other words, the Egyptian pyramids were built in a premeditated attempt to deceive the world in respect to the true history of the Greco-Roman Empire and the Mediterranean region in general. As of 2008, a total of 138 pyramids have been discovered in Egypt. Numerologically speaking, the number “138” is highly esteemed in Greco-Roman lore. The number “13” equates to the letter “M”, an acronym for “Man” (i.e., the “Line of Man” and the 13 Bloodlines of Rome), while the letter “H” equates to the number “8”, an acronym for “Infinity” or “Forever”. Therefore, the number “138” ultimately equates to “13 Bloodlines of Rome Forever”. This notion is only accomplished by hiding the respective history of the Greco-Roman Empire, hence the fraudulent pyramids of Egypt. Interestingly, the Egyptian Pyramid of Khafre was built with a “cap” or “capstone” that defies the both the laws of physics and time. Under normal circumstances, the very tip of a pyramid would sustain the most coercion due to its exposure to the elements (e.g., air, moisture, rain, sand, sunlight, wind, etc.). Despite being exposed to the elements on all five sides (i.e., top, north, east, south and west), it has mysteriously remained relatively intact. This suggests that the Pyramid of Khafre was built with a cap to begin with, an apparent tribute to Greenland, the “cap” or “capstone” of the Earth. This notion is confirmed by the name “Khfre” (C/K+F/P+R) which acronymically and/or consonantly equates to “Cap Rome” or “Cap Four”, a possible reference to the four-pronged Roman Cross.

W. F. Price #sexist web.archive.org

It seems to me that human resources has become one of those gender-specific jobs, like logger or cocktail waitress. In my experience, HR is overwhelmingly female, and these are the people who have the power to hire or fire you.

In my limited experience working with female supervisors, I have found them to be less forgiving and less considerate, possibly because they think that men only respond well to abusive slave-driver types. I have also noticed that they are far less likely to directly warn workers or inform them in plain terms that they are dissatisfied. This tends to make male workers feel that their authority is capricious and cruel, and that they can be terminated for anything at any time.

The end result is that men – and particularly men of a certain type – are being pushed out of certain occupations and organizations, and find themselves driven to more exclusively male lines of work, such as construction, driving and law enforcement, and this may explain why men’s unemployment is so much higher than women’s in the current recession. In fact, I would say that the increasing domination of the corporate world by women in middle management – especially HR – has greatly restricted occupational options for younger men, even as senior male managers go out of their way to foster and accommodate women.

What I’d like to know if this corresponds with greater productivity. I suspect that it does not, but I’d have to see the numbers.

One theory I have heard is that senior male managers use females in middle management to keep workers in line and more easily fire people, because they have less of a sense of responsibility for those who work under them. This leads to a more humble and frightened work force, and despite warm and fuzzy talk about wanting “satisfied” workers, perhaps corporate bosses (almost all male) actually want the people working for them to live in fear. A scared and humble work force will go the extra mile to avoid being fired, and will work for less compensation.

I am curious as to whether readers have observed the same. Has the introduction of women into management fundamentally changed the way we work? If so, has their arrival been accompanied by fear and insecurity in the workplace, or has it been positive on the balance? We ought to have these discussions, because women are not going to leave the workforce any time soon, and perhaps it’s time to figure out how we might mitigate some of the negative effects.

Given that there has been a lot of speculation recently about how women will dominate the economy (or what’s left of it) in the future, these are perfectly reasonable concerns for men.

Wayne Allen Root #wingnut #fundie #conspiracy creators.com

I'm a God-fearing and God-loving American patriot. I am a Jew who took Jesus Christ as my savior almost 30 years ago. Today, I feel the devil all around us, like never before in my lifetime ... in any lifetime. This coronavirus crisis has the devil's evil fingerprints all over it. Not certain I'm right?

If I were the devil, if evil were my middle name, I'd love the deep state, the corrupt Washington, D.C., swamp and, most of all, its PR division, the liberal media. I'd love big government, globalists, communists, socialists and Marxists — anyone who would put the American people in misery and slavery. I'd dedicate my life to anything and anyone who'd destroy the American dream, opportunity and mobility. Because, of course, the devil loves misery. I'd want to enslave the American people to big government, ruin their exceptionalism, make them ordinary citizens of a global army of serfs. I'd want to turn the positive, wonderful, exceptional lives of prosperous American business owners into lives of misery, malaise and poverty. I'd want America to be no different than Cuba, Venezuela, Haiti or Mexico. Why should America escape my misery and pain? I'd give my support to anyone who'd take the American dream away. And more than anything, I'd hate President Donald J Trump. I'd hate anyone who wants to make America great again. I'd want to wipe that smirk right off the faces of Americans who love their country and God. I'd want them to suffer.

To accomplish all this ... I'd want to create a pandemic just like the coronavirus.

It would wipe away all of Trump's amazing, magical and miraculous economic achievements of the past three years ... in just a matter of a few shocking, depressing, tragic weeks. It would crash the stock market; collapse the oil and energy markets; kill over 30 million jobs; close the entire U.S. economy; shutter millions of small businesses. It would turn tens of millions of Americans into welfare addicts and wards of the state; eliminate Trump's 20,000-person stadium rallies; overwhelm the entire economic system; bring business owners to their knees; and make big government the only option to save a drowning nation no longer so "exceptional." It would make Americans hide in their homes, accept government telling them whether their businesses are "essential," deciding whether they can earn a living or not, deciding whether they can gain access to a potentially life-saving anti-malaria drug protocol or not. I'd root for a massive overreaction that leaves America shocked, depressed and weakened. And the government's reaction would be to spend so much money it would leave America crippled by unimaginable debt for decades to come. I'd laugh and do a dance to celebrate all the rich and powerful business owners left with nothing, reduced to begging big government to bail them out. And obviously, I'd hate Christianity more than even America or Trump.

I'd create something so vile and frightening it would close down churches and prevent Easter church services for the first time in the history of America. As a bonus, I'd want everyone in America to be not only broke, scared and humbled but also miserable. So, I'd eliminate all sports; close down movie theaters; shut down Las Vegas, air travel and cruise ships; cancel vacations and weddings. There would be no way out — except misery, depression and loneliness. Sex? All dating would be canceled. No one could come within six feet of each other. Except for Neil Ferguson, the U.K. scientist who scammed the whole world with hysterical, exaggerated claims and then apparently violated social distancing to have an affair with a married woman. That Ferguson is my kind of guy — a real devil!

usachinanukewar #fundie usachinanukewar.wordpress.com

My conclusion. I don’t need any gigantic penis and 8-packs. All I need now is my own immortal body that can fly. I wanna meet Jesus in the air. And, in the New Millennium, I can ask Jesus to go naked swimming with me in an island in the Pacific. I really would rather peek Jesus’ immortal gorgeous penis bumping and jumping just like a very extremely gorgeous pendulum swinging backward and forward in a really fast way when we both go naked playing volleyball on pearl-white sands of beach. I don’t need a huge jumbo walking HIV in human form with 8-packs and a gigantic penis, earthly and fast aging and dirty and deadly and very poor and very stupid. Bear in mind. I’m an extraordinarily smart Bella Boy, and I’ve found my Edward, Lord Jesus. I’m taken. So, any earthly Jacob with 8-packs and a gigantic penis is simply just a huge jumbo walking HIV in human form to me. Don’t bother me and get lost.

Dobie #fundie christiandiscussionforums.org

[...your foundation is utterly without any evidence. You have no documentation or observation of either heaven or hell or god or the devil. A house built on sand will fall you know. Best build on actual rock.]

Just because YOU need the mioptic mindset even you cannot base FACTS on doesn't say a dam thing about God not being real.

Don't loath what you are so pridefully ignorant of and surely don't play smug with such a pseudo-intellect.

There are many events and such that are real and science cannot prove or disprove and let these things go as unexplained.

Science has learned in recent years that prayer is real and causes factual changes as evidence in the brain and body.
Many things are proven to be seen or known and yet no scientific basis as yet to prove.
Evolution is hardly more than a moronic theory and yet you duh student thinks ya got the facts.

Talk about blind faith!

Silas Reynolds #fundie therightstuff.biz

[From "A Current Year™ Listicle: The “They Had It Coming” Catalogue"]

Steve Otter is now dead. In a delicious bit of irony, the White communist and anti-apartheid activist was murdered by vibrant home invaders on December 16th (Reconciliation Day in South Africa). Naturally, the powers that be in the failed state of South Africa are both deeply concerned, but also in a state of profound grief. South Africa’s minister of culture, Nathi Mthethwa, delivered a sorrowful statement on the late anti-White agitator’s fate, “We are devastated and outraged to learn about the fatal attack which claimed the life of author and former journalist Steven Otter.”

[...]

But, in my honest opinion, Steve Otter sounds like he had it coming – if you catch my meaning. That’s not a clarion call for any would-be warriors to begin physical removal, but rather a sense of smug satisfaction in shitlibs (or I call them socialist-slash-communists because that’s what they are) and anti-White agitators receiving their just deserts.

It’s our Current Year™ now. The Old Right is in shambles and the Left has lost over a 1,000 legislative seats under President High Yeller. Purple haired and gender fluid SJWs are bravely and literally shaking from fear. Hate trumps love in the Current Year™ and any minute Vice President Pence will institute widespread and enforced electro-shock conversion therapy – starting with San Francisco. That being said, it’s worthwhile to dive into the (non-retconned) history books and celebrate a commie’s comeuppance on occasion.

Below is a Current Year™ listicle on now lionized, but thoroughly perverted Marxists and, occasionally and coincidentally Jewish, subversives that said sayonara.

5. This Machine Kills Fascists…Not Really.
http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2017/01/Victor-Jara.jpg
Víctor Jara
– was supposed to be Chile’s next Woody (or Arlo) Guthrie (it doesn’t matter though, they were both equally shitbags anyway). He was a Chilean teacher, theatre director, lovesick poet, singer-songwriter and political hack. As we all know, Chile experienced something akin to a miracle in the early 1970s with the rise of Augusto Pinochet – a man with a penchant for sunglasses and physically removing communists via helicopter rides, along with his elite death squad called the “Caravan of Death.” Shortly after the anti-communist coup on September 11th, 1973, Jara was arrested, tortured under interrogation and eventually got a bullet in the head. Afterwards, his body was thrown in the street of a shanty town in Santiago. Good riddance.

Why Removal? Despite being labeled a peaceful singer/song writer, Jara was a dedicated communist and antagonist to the traditional and conservative Chilean people. He considered himself essentially a man of the people and the bard to the Popular Unity Government under Salvador Allende – who planned on making Chile a Soviet satellite state, after he converted the country to a leftwing socialist nightmare (inflation was at 150% prior to the coup with plans for land redistribution and social justice reforms). Early in his recording career he showed a knack (don’t they all) for provoking normal and religious Chileans, releasing a traditional comic song called La beata that depicted a religious woman tempting a priest at confession. The song was rightfully banned on radio stations and removed from record shops. Prior to being physically removed by Pinochet’s men, it was well known that Jara had made visits to both Cuba and the Soviet Union (including a concert in Moscow) in the early 1960s and he had officially joined the Communist Party. In addition, there were rumors that Jara was involved in unsavory sexual activities (think pedophilia).

The Happening: On the morning of September 12th, Jara was taken as a prisoner by the military and interned in the Chile Stadium. His body was later discarded outside the stadium along with other subversives who had been killed by the Chilean Army. Prior to being shot in the head, Victor Jara had his hands broken – either as a punishment for playing his guitar or something more sinister.

4. The Power of Poetry vs. El Caudillo
http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2017/01/Miguel-Hern-ndez-removed.jpg
Miguel Hernández
- was an early 20th century Spanish poet and playwright associated with the Generation of '27 movement and the Generation of '36 movement. His fate was sealed as a member of the Communist Party of Spain since Hernández “fought” for the Spanish Republicans, the merciless bastards that wanted to destroy Catholic Spain during the Spanish Civil War. During the war he wrote poetry and propaganda. Fortunately, he was unsuccessful in escaping Spain after the Republicans finally surrendered (they hardly ever won a battle, unless it was murdering priests and nuns). After the war, he was arrested multiple times for his anti-fascist sympathies (think pinko commie signaling).

Why Removal? Eventually, Hernández joined the First Calvary Company of the Peasants' Battalion as a cultural-affairs officer, reading his propaganda poetry daily on the radio. He traveled extensively throughout the country, organizing communist cultural events and doing poetry readings for soldiers on the front lines. Like Jara, Hernández also traveled to the USSR, where he acted as a representative for the Spanish Republic (and likely got his marching orders from the Soviets). He also attended the II International Congress of Antifascist Writers which took place in Madrid and Valencia.

The Happening: After the Republicans and their communist allies were defeated, he was condemned to death in 1939 - he was described as, "an extremely dangerous and despicable element to all good Spaniards." The Nationalists gave him a pretty reasonable out - he was presented with an opportunity to renounce communism and apologize for betraying Spain. He refused, but his death sentence, however, was commuted to a prison term of 30 years, leading to incarceration in several prisons where he eventually croaked from tuberculosis in 1942.

3. "Muh Resistance"
http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2017/01/Jean-Moulin1---Removed.jpg
Jean Moulin
– the French Resistance, for the most part, was extremely overrated by both the Western Allies (the Soviets had a different sort of involvement) and Charles de Gaulle – de Gaulle probably deserves his own Alt-Right dressing down, the man was a disgrace to both the French military and the Pied-Noirs. Thanks to de Gaulle’s involvement, Jean Moulin was propped up and became the face of the Resistance and idolized after the war. He is remembered today as the main emblem of the Resistance, owing mainly to his role in unifying elements of the French Resistance (think communists, trade unionists and, finally, patriotic Frenchmen) and his highly publicized death at the hands of the “Butcher of Lyon” Klaus Barbie.

Why Removal? For starters, Moulin was no soldier during the Fall of France in 1940. He was a prefect (think government administer with broad powers). He was arrested shortly after the German invasion because he refused to admit that French Senegalese colonial troops had massacred French civilians. To be fair, there is much of the Second World War that could be described as “murky” at best, but the Senegalese (African units both from the French colonies in North Africa and also many from sub-Saharan Africa) were known after The Great War (think "The Black Shame") and after World War II (their mass rape of Italian women) for grotesque horrors committed on the civilian population. After the massacre, the German Wehrmacht had many of the Senegalese executed and requested that Moulin sign-off on the action to prevent them from being accused of “muh war crimes.” Moulin refused. He even refused after personnel from the German army personally walked him to the site of the massacre and showed him the bodies of civilian men, women and children who had been butchered, raped and mangled.

Now, most of the history of the Second World War is shrouded in propaganda and most everything the Germans claimed (with respect to conduct) has been described as “lies” by the press (especially today). In Moulin’s case, the Germans claimed that while he was imprisoned in a POW camp with those Senegalese troops (likely quartered with Moulin as payback for not acknowledging the massacre), Moulin developed “a taste for blacks.” Per the Germans, Moulin was a homosexual and during a lover’s quarrel with one of his African comrades, the dindu slit his throat with a piece of broken glass. Moulin claimed that he attempted suicide, but that doesn’t really stack up – considering that rumors about Moulin’s homosexuality still exist today and his close “friendship” with (((Max Jacob))) being a blatant red-flag – Jacob was a well-known communist and homosexual poet and painter. Immediately after the war, Moulin was painted as the epitome of the Frenchman womanizer, but in the Current Year™ - it’s pretty well known in France that he was a homosexual.

Moulin was eventually released from custody (because that’s what the evil Nazis did) and joined the French Resistance.

The Happening: In reality, Moulin’s involvement in the Resistance was exaggerated at best – and, he overshadows brave men who did fight and die in the Resistance. Like the others on our list, Moulin was clearly a communist infiltrator (and by some accounts utilized by the Soviets to get close to de Gaulle). Moulin had been described as a “fellow traveler” due to his friendship with open communists and he had supported the Republicans during the Spanish Civil War (a recurring theme). Moulin was eventually betrayed by a fellow member of the Resistance - some historians, including Klaus Barbie, blamed communist (((Raymond Aubrac))). Rumors on Moulin’s death, along with Barbie’s interrogation “tactics,” are so outrageous that they demand a certain level of skepticism – like skinning Moulin alive or using bestiality as a torture technique. For a man labeled the “Butcher of Lyon,” it’s somewhat suspect that he was (again) rumored to have been recruited by the West German government to eventually assist the CIA with tracking down Che Guevara.

2. An (((Uprising))) Crushed
http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2017/01/Rosa-Luxemberg-Removed.jpg
(((Rosa Luxemburg)))
- was a Marxist theorist, philosopher, economist, anti-war activist and revolutionary Jewish communist. A convenient piece of history that occurred in Germany after the First World War and is generally excluded in modern history books (at least in the US) – was that Germany was in the middle of a post-war revolution (called the November Revolution 1918 - 1919). The outcome being either the failed Weimer Republic or a Soviet Germany. The uprising was primarily a power struggle between the moderate Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) and the Communist Party of Germany, led by Karl Liebknecht and (((Rosa Luxemburg))), who had previously founded and led the revolutionary leftwing Spartacist League, along with (((Leo Jogiches))), (((Paul Levi))), Ernest Meyer, Franz Mehring and (((Clara Zetkin - honorary))).

Why Removal? The Spartacist Uprising (also known as the January Uprising) was a general strike, including armed battles in the streets, in Germany in January 1919. On Sunday, January 5th, thousands of armed communists gathered in the streets of Berlin. By the afternoon, Berlin’s train stations and the newspaper district were occupied by the communists. They also took over a police headquarters and demanded the overthrow of the German government – their vision – the destruction of an already weak and exhausted Germany and its transformation into a Bolshevik state (led by communist Jews).

The Happening: The German government eventually unleashed the Freikorps – a band of World War 1 veterans with a fondness for physically removing subversives and communists. In addition to crushing the January Uprising, they would also fight the communists in the Baltics and defeat the Bavarian Soviet Republic. It could be fair to call them one of the world’s first “death squads.” With respect to the militant Jewish uprising led by (((Luxemburg))) and her toady, Liebknecht – the men of the Freikorps quickly liberated the blocked streets and buildings and many of the insurgents were killed or surrendered. Unsurprisingly, (((Luxemburg))) and Liebknecht were found hiding in a Berlin apartment a few days later. They were arrested and handed over to the Freikorps unit - Garde-Kavallerie-Schützen-Division, led by Captain Waldemar Pabst. In the end, it probably didn’t matter how much the communists squirmed and tried to talk their way out of their fate – they were both shot in the head. Particularly fitting was (((Luxemburg’s))) demise, her body was unceremoniously dumped in the Landwehr Canal – it was discovered months later.

Her last known writing before she met the business end of a German 98 Mauser was “Order Prevails in Berlin.” It was written while she was hiding after the uprising was crushed. Here is the last line: ““Order prevails in Berlin!” You foolish lackeys! Your “order” is built on sand. Tomorrow the revolution will “rise up again, clashing its weapons,” and to your horror it will proclaim with trumpets blazing: I was, I am, I shall be!”

Sounds crazy. Sounds like she had it coming.

1. A First-Class Coincidence
http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2017/01/Ruth-First---removed.jpg
(((Ruth First)))
- was a South African anti-apartheid activist and commie scholar born in Johannesburg, South Africa. Her parents were Latvian Jews that immigrated to South Africa in 1906. Predictably, as soon as they arrived in their new home they began the process of destroying it – they became one of the founders of the Communist Party of South Africa. Eventually, (((First))) would become a communist as well, with her mission being the overthrow of the White minority government and securing the country’s utter devastation. Just another coincidence in history – Jews immigrating to a new county and then advocating for said country’s demise through either radical leftist agitation or racial disunity (or both). She would later encourage mining strikes and communist subversion and found herself banned and exiled from the country. She was also married to another prominent anti-apartheid activist, proud communist and politician – (((Yossel Mashel Slovo))) – changed his name to “Joe” for easier infiltration (also a Jewish immigrant from the Baltics).

Why Removal? Do we still need to ask at this point? In March 1960, thousands of South African dindus essentially tried to destroy a police station in Sharpeville, South African. The White police officers, using Sten sub-machine guns and bolt-action rifles, along with armored personnel carriers, were eventually able to quell the crowd through deadly force. Today – the incident is called the Sharpeville Massacre. In South Africa the “official” story is that a peaceful and vibrant crowd of oppressed South Africans were brutally attacked by the evil and racist police state. In reality, less than 200 White police officer were being swarmed by 20,000 rioting blacks hurling stones at them – everyone in the Current Year™ knows the real score. It was fight or be torn limb from limb.

Anyway, (((First))) and her anti-White husband (((Slovo))) were doing what all Jews do – instigating and riling up the dindus against the White government (the government and people that created civilization in Africa). She and her husband had been the vanguard of anti-White rioting during the 1950s. (((Slovo))) had actually joined a communist and explicitly anti-White militia (designed off the Red Army). In addition, scores of White South African police officer had been assassinated, killed in raids or assaulted during the Jewish-led “soft” uprising during the 1950s.

By 1960 (and after the Sharpeville riot), her time in South African came to end. Back when governments actually cared for their people, the South African government came to the wise decision that this Jewish subversive needed to be exiled and removed from the country.

The Happening: Not content to live her life peacefully abroad, (((First))) moved to London and became involved in the British anti-apartheid movement. She would later move back to Africa (Mozambique) and continue advocating for the destruction of Whites in South Africa. Cue a man called Craig Williamson – quoted as once saying, “I respect a person who's willing to die for his country, but I admire a person who is prepared to kill for his country." Williamson, exposed as spy (and all-around “special operator”) in 1980, is accused of physically removing (((First))) in 1982. Evidently, she received explosive first-class prank mail – which ended her anti-White and communist campaigning.

[Each entry is accompagned with a photography of the subject on which is overwritten "Physically Removed"]

Truth v Lies #fundie mercatornet.com

Louis, you do not need rocket science to work out that the pink gaystapo have an investment in keeping the truth at bay as the whole homosexual way of life is based on the lie that you are born that way.
That is very hard to believe when one of your own kind stands up at a conference to discuss all things homosexual that they had to make it a civil rights issue. We had to dispel the idea that we are born gay because if we don't then we have to admit that we can stop being homosexual. That was a public statement made in a public meeting for all to hear. To paraphrase, "we have to hide the truth that we are not born gay so that we can sidetrack society into believing it is a civil rights issue. In other words, the truth must be corralled so that we can spread our lies to get what we want. And in other, other words, why should we believe anything you say?

....

Scientists can't prove what doesn't exist and an open minded homosexual is an oxymoron. In addition, the truth about homosexuality has been banned from the university campuses, the main steam media, the education system and governments. The end result is that society today is being re-engineered by a social reforming jackboot brigade who are offering us a house built on sand. If it keeps going at the rate it is, like the past, it will destroy society so in effect they are signing their own death warrant whilst we enjoy the prospect of the second coming of Christ, which I believe their sin and perversion will hasten Whatever happens, we win, they lose.

TheSplosher #conspiracy alien-ufos.com

It's cause I've got Alien Connections that's why the Men In Black are around me in my local area reason why cause of my Alien Connections cause of tingles all over me on 3 5 10 when a UFO Sphere with a wiggly island on it hovered outside my address and it made me stand up and tingles all over me.
It's the same tingles I had dancing in my skull two of them and entering my body in different directions when I was age 11 of year 89 when I a Scout outside on the Beach after bringing water out of this boy's mouth with my Eyes moving my eyes left to right inches away from his body without using my hands. Immediately after that tingles happened in my skull and body dancing all over in different directions and this presence tall presence and wide nearby me on the Beach appeared from nowhere. Supposidly when something or someone has alien connections the Men in Black are there around you how I know this for sure one guy on here told me he too saw the Men In Black and he said that Dan Aykroid from Films such as Ghostbusters and My Girl has seen them in real life whilst he filming a building that had alien connections to it and he saw this car on his Video Camera when he played it back and supposidly the car that he saw on his Video Camera elsewhere wasn't there in real time Dan Aykroid says that's the Men In Black watching him cause he's recording a building that has alien connections. That's why I'm seeing the Men in Black around me cause I've got alien connections from those tingles that happened to me 3 5 10 with that UFO Sphere that has a wiggly island on it from the same tingles in me when I was age 11 of year
89 for I'm an Alien from Planet whatever it's called in human form. When I was age 11 of year 89 I didn't believe in UFOs and Aliens back in them days I just a normal healthy kid doing what normal healthy kids do by getting wet in the Sea with my Jeans gear on denim all over me and playing in the Mud and them tingles in my skull and body all over me happened to me during the second week of being a Scout during the evening must be just before the Summer them days cause it's a bright blue clear sky of the evening during that time frame. I never heard of UFOs and Aliens till I age 12 of year 90 in March then I started to begin to believe in UFOs and Aliens when I was age 12 of March of year 90.

Sassy #fundie religionethics.co.uk

Bring factual evidence of all the above otherwise your argument is built on sinking sand. We both know that your beliefs about science requires more faith than a creationists. A creationist knows their God and so can have confidence in what he has said. The bone of contention is this.. Science cannot prove or explain where the first life came from. The second is that when it comes to the universe they are left stranded when it comes to evidence.
If anyone was said to be being dishonest then it is those who believe without reason to believe science in these matters. Because without evidence those theories do not cut it.

God told us how he has the power to speak everything into being.
Science cannot even tell you how we are here.

D Daskalos #fundie answers.yahoo.com

(there's much more stupid where this came from)

"Oh this Evolution crap again!!!

How many times has it been proven that an amoeba's genetic system no matter what mutagenic substance it becomes exposed to won't mutate into that of a nematode, for crying out loud! I just can't imagine this crap becoming a theory in the first place. it shouldn't have gone past the hypothesis level. Since transforming one genetic system into another will probably never be accomplished in the laboratory, anything that this evolution crap assumes as an amoeba "evolving" into a multicellular organism should only be taken as mere speculation and nothing more.

And these evolutionists even have the guts to classify Latimeria sp. as a "Lazarus taxon." HAHAH LMFAO. What? Something resurrected from the dead? HAHAH LMFAO. The bewildering resurfacing of the coelacanth (Latimeria sp.) is what i think to be the proverbial nail that seals the coffin of this "theory" of evolution. This lobe-finned fish and its cousins were thought to be the source of the missing link for fishes & amphibians. they first appeared during the Devonian Age and thought to have been extinct since the Cretaceous 6 million yrs ago. Unfortunately for evolutionists & atheists, a coelacanth species appeared off the coast of S Africa in 1938, after a long, long absence from the 'evolutionary' stage, amazingly unchanged after millions of years of existence, proving that its genetic system has remained stable through all those years. I'm sure a lot of evolutionists have been scratching their heads ever since. HAHAH LMFAO

The theory of evolution is just a HOPELESS DELUSION of atheists. I'd like to be counted as one among many who strongly advocate that this alleged "theory" be only taught to graduate students of SPECULATIVE BIOLOGY! It's really nothing more than stupid religion for those with "amoeboid consciousness." HAHAH LMFAO"

Andy Schlafly #fundie conservapedia.com

The theory of evolution cannot permit any "counterexamples," or examples of things that could not have evolved. As in logic, the existence of merely one counterexample disproves the truth of the rule.

Here are some counterexamples to evolution:

*beautiful autumn foliage, which lacks any plausible evolutionary explanation
*the whale, which has no plausible ancestor (Charles Darwin suggested black bears)
*the eye, which lacks a plausible pathway for incremental evolution
*bloodclotting, which also lacks a plausible pathway for incremental evolution
*Jellyfish in Hawaii, which swarm to the beaches precisely 9 to 10 days after each full moon[1]
*cicada that appear like clockwork every 13 years for some species, and every 17 years for others[2]
*migratory powers of butterflies and birds[3]

Tim Rowe #fundie charismanews.com

Are we living in another generation like Noah's, when toxic thinking is destroying our entire culture?

"The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was continually only evil. The Lord was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved Him in His heart" (Gen. 6:5-6).

It is sobering to see what happened to the human heart because of a reckless thought life. It did not take long after sin had poured into the human race in the Garden of Eden for men's and women's thinking to go down the tubes. Almost immediately, Adam and Eve let fear dominate their thinking when they hid from the presence of God. God was no longer the focal image of their thoughts. Corrupt thinking only worsened as Cain murdered Abel when thoughts of jealousy and anger shaped his heart into a killer. Sin was crouching at the door of Cain's thought life, and he failed to master it. Each succeeding generation continued to allow sin to crowd God out of their thinking.
The Days of Noah: The Point of No Return

In Genesis 6, people's thought lives had so corrupted their hearts that they reached a point of no return. Every thought, imagination and intention of their human thinking was consistently and totally evil. The Bible does not say some of the imaginations and thoughts of the human race were continually evil, but all of their images, desires, intentions and inclinations in every single thought, were evil.

This was not just some weekend fling. It was their thinking from the time they got up in the morning until the time they went to bed at night. There was not a moment in the day when this evil thought process was not actively controlling their minds and shaping their hearts. They wanted absolutely nothing to do with God in their thinking and ultimately in their hearts.

The psalmist affirms this destructive habit of wrong thinking to the human heart:

"The wicked, through the pride of his countenance, will not seek God; God is not in all his thoughts" (Ps. 10:4).

This wicked and rebellious people in the time of Noah did not seek God in their thinking. God was not in one single thought. God is the most awesome thing we can ever think about, but these people were so deceived that they did not believe they needed God.

This is the tragic height of selfishness. This is the ultimate ego trip. This is the most dangerous thinking pattern on the planet. Without God in our thoughts, we have written the death sentence to the magnificent purpose God has prepared for our lives. To never know Him is the greatest catastrophe of the ages. He deserves the honor to be first in our thinking.

Our thoughts are a mighty weapon that can forge our hearts into a steel fortress for our God, or they can be a stealth bomber that penetrates our inner lives and destroys our hearts. Thoughts are a much more powerful weapon than any nuclear bomb. They are the critical component to our spiritual growth. We must have a disciplined thought life that is focused like a laser on God and His Word, or our hearts will become a mush of spiritual apathy and worldly lusts.

The devil is a master general at attacking the thought life of a Christian. His war strategy involves tactics of deception, pressure, and enticement to turn our thinking away from God and toward his kingdom. The devil knows that every action that flows out of the human heart originates from our thoughts. He knows that our moral character is an exact image of our thinking. Our thoughts determine whether our character drifts toward good or evil.

The devil knows that in order for a person to do evil, he must first think evil.

Within 10 generations after the fall in the garden, the devil was so successful that only one person on the entire Earth had godly thoughts. Sin had spread like wildfire and contaminated every single thought of what was probably between 235 million and 7 billion people. To imagine that only one person out of this massive population had his thought life together is mind-boggling. Nothing in their thoughts reflected the image of God and not one thought brought glory to God. They were wise, rich, sophisticated and cultured for their time, but the defining characteristic of their age was wickedness because of their thinking.

A civilization that is centered on an ungodly thought life is built on sinking sand. This civilization in the days of Noah received the fruit of their thoughts, which was wickedness and corruption that multiplied on the face of the Earth.

Only Noah was thinking rightly and found favor with God. No one else held the image of God and His words as the standard for their thoughts. No one else was guarding their thoughts. No one else cared that their thought life had nothing good in it, but was a breeding ground for evil. Only Noah had righteous thoughts that built his faith and fueled his obedience to God. Noah's thought life was pure and free from evil because he walked with God.

Genesis 6:6 reveals how the toxic thinking of the human race affected God's heart. These verses contain the first usage of the word heart in the Bible, and they describe a heart that is in deep sorrow.

"The Lord was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved Him in His heart" (Gen. 6:6).

The toxic thought life of His precious creation broke God's heart. God's heart was in horrible agony and pain as He groaned in sorrow over the condition of the heart of every member of the human race. He cried in agony that His people refused to honor Him with even one thought.

Are our thought lives any better today? Does our thinking bring great agony to the heart of God? How God must grieve today over the thought lives of so many Christians and the toxic thinking of this generation.

God is sounding out a clarion call to all who would listen that what we think is critically important to the heart of God. He knows He cannot have your heart if He does not first have your thoughts.

I don't want to break the heart of God because of my toxic thinking. I want to bring glory to God with my thinking. I want to honor Him with every thought. I do not want any virus to infect my thinking and take out the operating system of my heart. A reckless thought life led to the annihilation of an entire civilization. Is it happening again?

Almighty's Humble Servant #conspiracy christianforums.com

Dearest brothers and sisters,

Wormwood, more commonly known as planet X is fast approaching. It is less than 3 years out. The Russians just launched a rocket at it, but we all know this is nothing to the Hand of ALmighty.

This planet, which is the size of Jupiter is causing global warming. It is also, causing other serious damage to our planet.

It brings with it, it's own gravitational pull, that WILL, change the rotation of our planet, and cause the winds to stop, the waters to stop, and the leaves to be still.
This will last 3 days. Then as the earths rotation changes direction, as the X falls in behind the sun, the water in your toilets will flush exactly opposite. The rivers will flow opposite. The quakes will be unimaginable, and like birthpangs will increase until the son of perdition is come.

The sop, a/c, maitreya is to arrive at this time. Perhaps on a meteor or some other heavenly body, but his advent is nigh.

The Fundamental Fundie #fundie #dunning-kruger facebook.com

Swing and a miss!

When it comes to accounting for logic, critical thinking, and reasoning, atheists/naturalists swing and miss every single time. Consciousness and self-awareness are immaterial, as are individual human thought and emotions like empathy and love.

God deniers claim that these things are all the products of chemical reactions, but if that were true, then there would be no distinct individual human thought nor would there be any distinct intrinsic human value. ...If love is just a chemical reaction, then the meaning and definition of love becomes redundant.

God deniers know God exists, but suppress that truth in unrighteousness. It's like being in a pool and holding down a large beach ball under the water. It takes a physical, and mental, effort to suppress God's truth.

Romans 1:19-23 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.

👉Please LIKE our page & SHARE this post far and wide! To share this post, click the image, then click "Share". ✞

1864897514651 #fundie kiwifarms.net

Science should not be anything of importance to the faithful. I do not care about evolution or the movement of stars because it has nothing to do with Salvation History. Only when science is in direct contradiction to the commands of God should we care about it. The scientific regressions that gave us abortion, contraception, and euthanasia should be outed as being from the depths of Hell. Any scientific findings that are against the Law of God are of a purely evil origin.

But we will not be quizzed at our Particular Judgment on the nitrogenous bases of DNA, the three domains of life, or whether or not man evolved from a single cellular organism. These things just do not matter at the seat of judgment, and they will not matter for all of eternity.

Anonymous Gossiper #conspiracy givemegossip.com

What if the lush Sahara Desert was purposely blasted away to stop humans from being their own shaman?

What if humans breathed deeply Earth's breath, organic breath. What if the spores and pollen of Earth were meant to waft and swirl around the globe and everyone was AWARE.

And now---it is illegal, forbidden. You are forbidden to take your brain to alternate areas of thinking which are offered freely in nature.

Did someone blast away a lush area off the globe to stop Africa contributing to the air Earthlings breathe? Today, what comes across the Atlantic, from the winds of Africa is sand and dirt….

Just some thoughts.

Safa #sexist feministcurrent.com

I really don’t understand where all of this transgender bullshit is coming from. It seems as though men have completely lost their minds. Power certainly does corrupt and these lawmakers and their fem-men constituents are becoming more delusional everyday. Men are rarely forthcoming with their reasons behind anything they do, but they must provide some sort of explanation for this current fuckery. It is possible that this is all a move to legitimize male sexual fantasy of watching females urinate, defecate and change soiled tampons. One would think that with the wide variety and accessibility of porn and prostitution, men would have an abundance of opportunities to view female genitalia. Maybe the transgender phenomena has taken off because females are opting out of the feminine gender script and these fellows are filling the vacuum.

Whatever the reason, there are several issues facing humanity that are more important than the worldwide effort to further enable male orgasms. Our fragile profit-driven economies are teetering on the brink of collapse as they require infinite growth on a finite planet. The earth is reaching its carrying capacity for the human species. Global patriarchal cultures have contributed to this by constructing human systems which enslave females and force them to become sperm receptacles. Almost all of the upheaval in various countries can be attributed to population overshoot and resource plundering. Humanity is desperate to keep our industrialized civilization going. When nations are resorting to petroleum extraction through hydraulic fracking, tar sands and deep-water drilling, industrial society and current population levels are unsustainable.

The main tenets of patriarchy are feeding males and facilitating their orgasms. Someone once said “not all men have power, but everyone in power is male.” They control everything--the military, resource distribution and human reproduction. Women can do nothing to stop this. We are stalled in a state of inaction because we are birthing babies, caring and catering to males and trying to earn money in de-humanizing employment. Most women do not even value each other and some prefer the isolated familial cages of domestic slavery.

I don’t think patriarchal systems have always been so widespread. Humans have existed in their current evolutionary form for about 200,000 years. We are fragile creatures. We do not have sharp claws or teeth. We do not run or swim very fast when compared to other animals. Our survival as a species has been attributed to our ability to cooperate within social groups. But right now, no one is cooperating. Men only work together to destroy and women have long since abandoned our mother/daughter bonds. We don’t have to look far to see where these bonds still exist within other mammalian societies. Female elephants still follow the matriarch to sources of food and water. Female chimps and bonobos congregate together on the forrest floor with their young. I think we can trace the beginnings of this culture of death and exploitation called patriarchy back to the origins of monotheism around 5,000 years ago.

Allowing males even more access to gazing upon, raping and killing females is not going to move humanity forward. We are going backwards and I think we have passed the point of no return. Oh, and to all of those fem-men in the US maybe you need to stop trying to get into women’s spaces and put your energies toward forcing red-state medicaid programs to pay for transgender medical needs and enact laws to prevent LGBT discrimination.

I love He Who created Me #fundie ca.answers.yahoo.com

Atheists why don't you accept the fact that evolution is a big joke?

How can random mutations create the perfect order we get in nature? Where are all the intermediate species? There should be fossils of ancestors of giraffes that have shorter and shorter necks, but they are not anywhere. When you see a Boeing you know that it has been created, designed by someone. But when you see a bird, much more complex, you think it was created by chance? Why should single-celled organisms "evolve" in multi-cellular organisms that are vulnerable to the environment?

Nathan "Leucosticte" Larson #fundie incels.co

Not all the suicidal are depressed

People assume that if you're suicidal, that means you're super-depressed. I don't really see it that way.

If you're depressed, it's like the cares of the world are pushing you down. That's what the dictionary definition of "depression" literally is: being pushed down.

If you're suicidal, though, then you've transcended depression. I would argue that if you're contemplating suicide, yet also feeling "depressed" or "melancholy," you might not actually be suicidal. The same force -- viz., the care and concern for your life, the world, your hopes and dreams, etc. -- that would "depress" you would also tend to hold you back from killing yourself, as long as you still hold out what in your eyes is a worthwhile shred of hope.

When you're truly suicidal, you feel freed of all that. You've let it go. That weight is no longer on your back.

What replaces it is a freedom to do whatever you want. You don't even have to try to cope anymore. You can just accept the unpleasant realities, because they'll soon be irrelevant. You can indulge in whatever behavior you feel like engaging in, because what the fuck does it even matter anymore? It doesn't. Even if you suffer consequences, you won't be around much longer to have to deal with those consequences.

Hope is what keeps us going, but it's also a burden, because where there's possibility, there's an obligation to pursue your potential, or else acknowledge that you're a loser by choice, because of your laziness or fear or whatever else you let hold you back. Despair relieves the burden. The black pill, then, can be a force for personal freedom, and the only downside of it is when it's a misguided pessimism that isn't grounded in reality.

When you get burnt out to the point that you say "fuck the world," you know that the world kinda deserves what it's getting by your killing yourself. Yeah, there were cool people who sought to do good in this world, but the people who really gave it their all and truly did what this world needed them to do in order to fix society and uphold the natural law, are a tiny, tiny minority. You saw that it was not enough to save your life from being a miserable hell, in which you reached a point where it became evident that further efforts would be mostly futile, to the point of it being like banging your head against the wall when there's not even anyone around to notice (or when they notice but just laugh at you for it).

You saw that what life had to offer was just never going to rise to your standards, and that it was all because of these douchebags who caused the world to be that way, and all the bystanders who just hung around with their thumbs up their asses instead of taking action to correct the situation, when they could have made the difference; so you said "fuck it".

You also realized that your own powers were to weak to enable you to either make the difference you wanted to make singlehandedly, or to organize a team to make those changes happen. So in the end, you failed the test of life; but in your death, evolution moves forward, so it's a win either way.

Someone was telling me that Lester Burnham from American Beauty was a psychopath. No he wasn't. He just realized the futility of trying to make his situation work. His wife was a hypergamous, emasculating bitch who cheated on him, so the relationship was doomed. He acknowledged this, put her in her place, and sought to replace her with some jailbait. The only thing "wrong" with that was that he was a middle-aged guy instead of a teenage Chad trying to fuck that girl.

You know, I tried to do something similar to what Lester did. I got out of prison and went to the fast food places and was like, "I'm a former accountant who did 46 months of hard time, and I just need ANY job." Okay, I didn't word it that way, but that was the thought running through my head. Anyway, unlike in the movie, I couldn't get hired anywhere, until I falsified my resume to make it seem like my whole work history had involved similar jobs as what I was applying for.

I feel satisfied that I have enough accomplishments under my belt to justify my having existed, sort of. I feel like my hands are tied from doing much more, too, and that if I hung around, in the end I would hit a new low, in terms of living conditions and what I would be subjected to having to see happen, with regard to people I care about but lack much power to try to help. I also have come to the conclusion that my whole family should commit a mass suicide, since their lives are mostly lacking in purpose; but I'm not going to force that on them.

One could say that the whole human race is lacking in purpose, but if it weren't us hanging around and existing and living, then it would be some other species that doesn't have as much capability for introspection. So it may as well be us. Hopefully as time goes on we can evolve further, but there will always be some dissidents who are on the cutting edge of progress, who have to put up with the rest of society's being further behind and holding them back.

By this point, it seems like it should be really obvious that we need to enslave foids, for the good of everyone. But there's a massive propaganda machine that says otherwise, and a lot of social pressure for us to shut our mouths and keep our contrary opinions to ourselves. If we don't shut our own mouths, they'll try to shut them for us, I've found.

People hate the blackpill, because they want to believe that they still have a chance to get what they want in this life. They don't want to face the alternative, suicide or LDARing, and all the drawbacks those choices have. Or if they choose to continue their mainstream life, they don't want to think about the outrages that are being perpetrated against them; they want to believe in a world where they are valued and treated accordingly. Or they think that if they just humble themselves, and live and speak in accordance with the bluepilled dogma, that society will respect them for this and treat them mercifully.

It sure is fun sometimes to fuck up their world of make-believe with the black pill, shattering their illusions like funhouse mirrors, but you know what's going to fuck up their world even more? Seeing you kill yourself. Because then they're gonna be like, "WHYYYYYYYYYY would anyone do that? This world is such a good place, with opportunity for happiness for all! Anyone can get help and learn to be strong enough to overcome adversity; there's no need to be weak like that." Yet, when respected people off themselves, it's like, "Uh oh, now I have to either lose respect for them, or come to terms with what may have made them want to off themselves."

Meanwhile, the blackpilled already know, and suicides are just confirmations of their theory. They see, "Okay, this is a logical person, someone aware of the truth, who weighed the alternatives and decided none were going to work for him to his satisfaction. Sucks that we now have one fewer person like that in the world, but that's the way it goes. The world is harsh to people like that. There will be others, though."

Bro. Randy #fundie teens-4-christ.org

[Thread about dresses vs pants]

I know some people say that there are some activities you cannot do in a skirt or culottes and be modest. I would agree. For example, I could see how it would be hard for a woman to be a skydiver in a skirt and be modest. I can see how it would be impossible for a woman to perform acrobatics in a skirt and be modest. I have heard people say it is hard to climb a tree in a skirt and be modest (I've also heard of girls climbing trees in a skirt ). I would suggest this: if you cannot do something in a skirt and be modest, perhaps you shouldn't do whatever that 'something' is. I'll give you an example: Kellie loves to go to waterslides. I love to swim. It is impossible for us to go to a water park or the beach and keep me from seeing things I shouldn't. It is also difficult for Kellie to go down a waterslide and be modest. So, we don't do waterparks. We have chosen to sacrifice pleasing our flesh for the sake of pleasing God.

Minister R. A. Artis #fundie books.google.com

Jonathan looked at the being that had just said his name was Lucifer, the enemy of mankind. The still vulnerable youngster stood in absolute shock and disbelief. Lucifer observed the young man intently, knowing that his mind was trying desperately to ascertain the gravity of his presence along with what he had just told him. Being the absolute master of conniving deception and charisma, Lucifer set in motion his devious scheme to coerce the boy to his dark light and vision.
Smiling magnanimously, Lucifer placed his hand on Jonathan’s shoulder and, with a quiet compassion, said, “I know this sounds incredible, Jonathan, but everything you hold dear is comprised of half-truths and carefully disguised lies.” Glowing with an ethereal luminance, Lucifer continued, “Let me explain from the beginning…”
“The world from which we abide is called Nahash, located around the star you call Alnilam, the center star in the belt of the constellation Orion. Our world developed our intelligence billions of years before yours, and we achieved a level of development where we evolved into pure energy. Our thoughts could be translated into whatever we could conceive. One of us achieved a power and intelligence greater than all and began to reshape the cosmos into his image. He became so powerful he was able to contract the entire universe into one small infinitesimally dense microscopic singularity and release all that enormous energy in what you call the ‘Big Bang.’ This enabled him to reform the universe as he saw fit. His name is Yahweh, the being you refer to as God.”
Jonathan was rocked to the core of his being as he interrupted Lucifer’s explanation, “Wait one moment! You mean to tell me that Yahweh, though powerful, may not be the God we hold as the Supreme Creator?!”
Smiling at the deductive reasoning and high intelligence the young man showed, Lucifer continued, “That is correct, Jonathan. Yahweh is indeed powerful and to you he may appear to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent, but, in essence he is not God in the sense you perceive God. In the vastness of creation, there are levels of omnipotence that you cannot conceive of in your present stage of development. There are many dimensions of existence in what is called the multiverse which is housed within the omniverse, the conceptual ensemble of all possible universes with all possible laws of physics. Yahweh is only the present manifestation of the Creator Force of this universe. There is, however, a being that is known to those who have attained a certain level of awareness who is the essence and intelligence of the omniverse, and he is referred to as the One Above All.”
“Let me continue, the One Above All decreed that all universes and realities be created, destroyed, and re-created in an eternally repetitive series of cycles for reasons known only to Him. Yahweh decided that instead of being the avatar of the One Above All, he would separate this universe from Himself and create his own cosmos with his own rules. The first thing Yahweh did was to create a pocket dimension he called Heaven, located in the recesses of the Northern quadrant of this universe. He then took the rest of the Nahashians and made them into the hierarchy of angelic beings. I was the first evidence of his creative genius, and he made me the epitome of his splendor, power, and wisdom. I and the rest of the host spent countless eons worshipping Yahweh as matter and time coalesced into its present form.”
“Yahweh then turned his attention to Earth and saw that one of the primitive ape-like creatures had unlimited intelligence and genetic potential. He wanted me to experiment on them. This experimentation took millions of years until I finally created Homo sapiens, who were designed from the very essence of Yahweh. Yahweh was so impressed with my handiwork he imbued man with a fraction of his divine spark that gave man a soul. This surprised and shocked many of the angels, as well as myself, who were confused as to the reason why Yahweh wanted to have created this new race of beings.
“Yahweh gave no reason only that we should be patient and trust him and for a time this was sufficient. However, I discovered that Yahweh intended for man to be a race of slaves, and I did not want this for I had become fond of man. I vehemently criticized Yahweh’s plan, accusing him of lacking vision and benevolence. I decided to collect evidence to persuade Yahweh that humanity deserved to be free to discover their place in the universe and to reach their own potential without the encumbering laws he had created to bind humanity to his oppressive will.
“You see, Jonathan, Yahweh desired all humanity to be his slaves and ignorant to the truth that freedom from his laws bring. I, on the other hand, desired man to have knowledge of self and have his mind opened to realization of that knowledge. Yahweh and I became estranged because of this ideological conflict and so, when in the Garden of Eden, where humanity’s primordial parents, Adam and Eve, the first of Homo sapiens, were told not to eat of the Tree of Knowledge, which was not an actual fruit but a metaphor for forbidden knowledge. Yahweh kept this information hidden from them like in the legend of Prometheus, who stole fire from the gods to give to man. I informed them that their nakedness represented Yahweh’s desire to keep them enslaved because of the threat they represented.
“Yahweh knew that one day man would become as powerful as Himself, and they would become a threat to His reign. Adam and Eve felt degraded by this revelation, and they rebelled against Yahweh who punished them by introducing death, pain, and suffering into the universe to keep them imprisoned to his will. Yahweh then made me the perpetrator of this egregious crime and formulated the legend of Satan and the birth of evil.”
“By this time, the barrier between Yahweh and me had become a full-fledged war, and a third of Heaven had taken up my cause to liberate man. I challenged Yahweh that he was far too removed from man to see how pain and anguish motivated Him to strive for meaning to His mortal existence. I demanded that if He truly wished to understand Himself then He should take human form. Angered by this, Yahweh chose to replicate himself and created Jesus Christ, whom He endowed with all His power. Jesus was fully human at the same time. I challenged Yahweh to experience human passions and desires through Jesus, and this He did by becoming familiar with the mortality of suffering and eventual death. I was awed and shocked by Yahweh’s decision to allow Jesus to die, supposedly as a sacrifice for man’s ‘transgression’ in the Garden of Eden; however, the truth of the matter was— and is— Jesus’ sacrifice was in vain.
“You see, the human spirit is so powerful that at death it resides either in an unconscious state within the body or in an extradimensional limbo. Some await rebirth, while those select few who have lived extraordinary lives are granted oneness with the One Above All, to exist eternally as part of the living spiritual intelligence of the omniverse. Jesus’ sacrifice to atone for sin was another clever ruse to keep humankind enslaved to the will of Yahweh. You see, unlike a regular human, when Jesus, who was Yahweh in human form, died on the cross, He knew that he would survive and thus could never have known the true suffering of man. Man does not know his soul will survive. It suffers, and in this ambiguity, man is granted a gift which Yahweh does not understand: the passion to cling to life and the strength that mortality affords you. Yahweh knew He would survive death and could not truly know what it was to be human.”
Lucifer decided it was time to twist the truth a little more in order to place another shred of doubt in Jonathan’s mind.
Feigning reluctance, Lucifer took a deep breath and vehemently said, “What I am about to divulge to you, Jonathan, is known only to very few. And if Yahweh knew I was telling you this He would most certainly destroy you. Heaven is not what you think. Yahweh created it in an effort to shield his presence from the One Above All and developed the myth that all human souls would subject themselves to his servitude. He formulated that they would abide there with Him after the death of their corporeal forms. The truth is, the only entities present in Heaven are those angelic Nahashians who are in Yahweh’s service, and Hell is another scare tactic He uses to keep his victims enslaved. Heaven and Hell can be on Earth and is how you live your life, Jonathan. You can either live your life a slave to the whims and wishes of a cruel and brutish god, or you can choose to have the blinders lifted from your eyes and see the light of the truth.”
Drawing himself closer to the young man’s beautiful face, Lucifer compassionately said, “Jonathan, Yahweh knows as well as I that humankind has evolved more quickly than anticipated. The latent abilities we foresaw in you will become evident in less than a generation instead of the centuries we thought, and, you my friend, are one of the first of those blessed to become the next stage of human development.
“Homo sapiens are evolving into gods, capable of all manner of wonders and miracles. Your race will transform the universe and I will help you to do so, for this is my desire, to help humans become like me and exist as independent entities, enslaved by no one. I will lead you to your glorious future and together we will topple Yahweh’s destructive and self-serving regime!”
Pleadingly, Lucifer reached out his hand to Jonathan and beseeched him, “Will you help me, Jonathan? Will you take your place at my side and expose Yahweh for what He is?”
Jonathan reeled from the sheer magnitude of all that he had heard and seen as he contemplated everything Lucifer had told him. Was it true that Yahweh was some sort of super alien being and everything he had learned concerning him was a lie designed to keep man from achieving his destiny? Was it Lucifer and not Christ the Messiah who was and Savior of mankind? Was it his destiny to help expose the truth of this to the world?
The young man sighed as he said as if he was weighed down by the entire world’s problems compounded doubly, “This is all so fantastic. I don’t know what to think, or do. I have to consider what to do with all that you have told me.”
Smiling graciously, Lucifer said, “I understand Jonathan. I realize I have placed a tremendous burden on you, but remember, fate rarely calls upon us at a time of our choosing, yet when it does, will you be ready? I will not force you Jonathan. You will have to decide for yourself what to do with what I have told you. Truth is a dangerous thing my friend, for once you have learned from it, you can never go back to who you were. Stay blind and in darkness and remain a slave, or take what I given you and free the world.”
Lucifer slowly disappeared and said in passing, “When the time comes, I shall return unto you and it will be then you will chose either to stand with me or against me. Farewell, until then …”
The sound of Lucifer’s voice echoed into the night sky as he vanished from sight and left Jonathan alone on the shores of Loch Ness.
The Scotland summer wind wafted over the waters of the famous lake and drifted over Jonathan, caressing his body with its warm light touch, as he tried desperately to make sense of what had just transpired. His entire world had been turned upside down and the teachings he had once held dear may all be a part of a carefully conceived lie invented by an immensely powerful alien who wished to maintain a dictatorial hold on humankind in order to prevent them from evolving into a super race that had the potential to bring his tyrannical rule to an end and restore the universe to the care of the One Above All, if everything Lucifer had told him was true. In his mind, Jonathan thought that this was all some form of hallucination, but if it was, then what caused it? He knew in his rational mind that this was indeed a true and real occurrence, but to what purpose? He was well aware that his gifts and talents made him stand apart, but was he so exceptional that he merited the attention of not only God, but that of Lucifer as well? Was Lucifer truly the evil entity he was portrayed to be, or was he indeed the being who truly created humans and the true Savior of mankind? Was he the benefactor of human civilization and not the perpetrator of malevolence and wickedness history showed him to be? These questions and many, many more raced through his mind as he looked over the waters of Loch Ness. The words which Lucifer spoke to him were the most compelling declarations he had ever heard and they carried a ring of truth, but, like strong black coffee, there was a bitterness that hung over him. Had Lucifer told him the truth or was he being the consummate liar he was said to be and was this an attempt to have him become a disciple of iniquity?
Falling to his knees, Jonathan cried out in a loud voice, “God, help me! What am I going to do?! I can’t handle this! It is too much for me to bear!”
The tears that flowed from his eyes dripped down his face and rained upon the ground as he wept in confusion and pain. All of a sudden, the waters of Loch Ness began to churn and great waves were thrown ferociously against the shores and broke Jonathan from his cries to God. The agitation grew more intense as the young man looked in confusion and wonder at what was occurring in front of him. What more could happen to him this night? Suddenly a great serpentine form exploded from the frothing disorder of the waters and released a deafening roar that chilled Jonathan to the very core of his being. Fearfully, Jonathan wondered if this was the famed Loch Ness Monster of legend.

project_mayhem_ #sexist reddit.com

MGTOW Fairy Tale: The Lost Fisherman

An old man lived in a small cottage by the sea with his wife. He was a fisher, and he was tall and thin, but surprisingly strong, and his skin was darkened and leathery from age and labor. He had white hair and a white beard. His wife was a squat, fat, ugly woman with straw colored hair. She rarely spoke, even to her husband the fisher. They had no children, since their son had died in the King's service.

Every day the fisherman went out to fish and took his catch to market. His wife stayed home and mended nets and tools for him. It was a dull existence for the fisherman, and he often prayed to God to throw him from his boat and let him drown.

One day while the fisherman was out as sea, a storm came upon him, the like of which he had never seen. "Surely" thought the fisherman, "my prayers are answered, and I will soon be drowned." But he was not thrown overboard. The wind and the waves carried the little fishing boat far out into the ocean, and the storm raged on. When finally, the skies cleared the fisherman was hopelessly lost. Having little water, and no definite idea where he was, the fisherman lay down in his boat and waited for the slow and miserable death he was sure would come.

For two days he drifted, lying back in his boat, and around sundown on the second day, he was roused by the impact of the boat against land. As he lay there, he heard the sound of beautiful music. It seemed to him that there was a woman singing a strange, foreign song. He finally climbed out of the boat and onto the shore of a little island, and set off to find the source of the singing. When at last he found the singing woman, it seemed to him in his delirium that the bottom half of her body was as a fish's tail, and that she were a mermaid. And when he tried to speak to her, no sound came out of his parched throat. He swooned before her and fell to the ground unconscious.

The fisherman woke to see the loveliest woman he had ever seen looking down on him. Her skin was smooth and perfect, her hair long and lustrous, her waist thin, her bosom firm, and her tail that of a fish. And the mermaid spoke to him, saying "lost traveler, is there any way I can help you?"

And the man thought that he should ask if she could help him to find his way home, but he did not truly wish to go home. He said, "I had hoped to die, but now I am here, and I am curious. What place is that, and what creature are you? What can you offer to help a lost man from far away?"

And the mermaid explained that she was one of the daughters of the god of the sea, and that she could not return him to his home, but that she could swim down to her father and make a wish on his behalf, and she listened to his story of his dreary life and his sorrow over the loss of his son. And the mermaid went into the ocean, and did not return all night.

When the sun rose the next day, the man felt a strange sensation flowing through his body and he looked down and watched as his skin smoothed out and his dark tan lightened, and when he looked at his reflection in the water, he saw his hair and his beard change before his eyes from white to black, and he was a young man again. And the mermaid rose from the water, and walked onto the beach and was no longer a mermaid, but a woman. And she went to the man and told him that her wish was to give him a new chance at life on the island, and the man was filled with joy.

That night they lay together, and when they awoke the next day, the former mermaid was great with child, and she gave birth, for the mermaid life cycle is different, and within the week, the child looked to be a boy of about five years, and he resembled the man's dead son so strongly that the man could not hold back his joy. And after the first week, the boy aged as a normal human boy. The man build a little house for his new family on the beach, and he worked tirelessly every day. He had to go into the interior of the island to carry fruits and fresh water down to the house, and he went out on his boat and caught fish. And the former mermaid woman stayed in the home and watched over the boy. The fisherman had never been so happy in his life, and he forgot that he had ever come from another land.

The seasons changed, and changed again, and one day the fisher returned home late and found a stranger lying on the shore near his home. He carried the man's unconscious body into the house, and the former mermaid woman nursed him back to health. The stranger was the young Duke Chadwick Cockswain of the land of Poonitopia. He was a powerfully built man, and not easily rattled. He thanked the fisherman for his hospitality and promptly built himself a shelter on the far end of the island, accepting no further help, and thereafter keeping to himself.

For the fisher and his family, things returned to normal, or so it seemed. The fisher couldn't put his finger on it, but it seemed to him that the mermaid woman was less affectionate towards him. Whereas before, she had always been content to stay in the house almost all the time, and watch after the boy, she began insisting that the fisherman was not doing enough around the house. She would demand that the fisherman take the boy with her so that she could focus on mending clothes and tools, but when the fisher and his son would return in the evening, no work would have been done.

Finally, one day the fisher came home and the woman and the boy were gone. He set out to look for them, and came across them at Duke Chadwick's house. And the mermaid woman told the fisher, "I'm sorry, but I'm with Chadwick, now." And the fisher was dismayed, and demanded, "How can you do this to me? To our son?"

"You shouldn't be surprised" the mermaid woman said, "our relationship has been over for a long time, now."

"What are you talking about? I thought you were happy. You made the wish for our life together. How can you throw that away? What does Chadwick have that I don't?"

"It's not about him. I've just felt trapped. You don't listen to me. I still love you, I'm just not in love with you blah, blah, blah"

And the fisher protested, but to no avail. And he took his son by the hand and turned to go home, but the mermaid stopped him, saying "where do you think you're going with my son?"

And they could not agree on who should keep the boy, and finally the mermaid woman summoned her father, the God of the sea, and he convened a hearing to determine the boy's fate.

The fisher and the mermaid woman argued their cases, and the sea God contemplated. And he judged that the mother should have the child, and that the father should deliver to Chadwick's house an amount of food, fresh water, and clothing sufficient for the care of the child, under pain of death.

And the fisher was forced to toil for nothing, alone on his side of the island, and he wept every day, for having lost his son twice. And the time past that the boy reached manhood, but he did not come to see his father, having been told lies that he was a bad man and had abused the mermaid woman. One day the mermaid woman came to the fisher to tell him that their son had died in an accident. But the fisher had no tears left to shed. Years of solitude passed and the mermaid woman returned again, and said, "Hey"

And the fisher was suspicious, and said "what?"

And the mermaid woman said, "I miss you."

And the fisher invited her in, but he was not fooled. And he listened to her talk, and he said little. He learned that she had left Duke Chadwick, because she had caught him fucking one of the wood nymphs that live in the interior of the island. Much as he hated her, he allowed her to stay on his side of the island again, and in exchange, she mended his clothes and tools when needed, and cooked his meals for him. And they grew old, and the mermaid woman became squat, fat, and ugly, and the fisher became thin and leathery and gray haired.

And one day the fisher went out to fish and was caught in a storm like he had only seen once before. It carried him away and he became lost. After days of drifting his boat made landfall, and he got out and heard music. He followed the sound of a woman's singing and came across a she-centaur. The she-centaur said that she was the daughter of the God of the mountain, and that she could make a wish to make him happy.

And the fisher said, "fuck that noise" and he got back in his boat and cast out to sea. No one knows if he ever made landfall again or if he drowned.

"European" #racist smartpunters.com

The dark times have begun. The election of a Nigger to a US PRESIDENT is the greatest abomination of history. People allways talk about Racism when whites attack a nonwhite but that is only their natural reaction-because they do NOT understand. It is about achievement! Since the first exodus of the indoeuropeans some 7000 years ago, the white race has been allways the heart of history.
And you have to consider that at 5000 B.C. all the people in North Africa, the Middle east and Central asia were whites too.
So from Aegypt, to mesopotamia, to the Hittites- to the first civilisation in India, to the Persian empire, to Carthago and Rome- all of the major civilisations of ancient times were founded by WHITES!!!! The only exeption is China but the Chinese are more white than black.
And how did the white race suffer and struggle in these times!!!! Europe survived the Hunns, the Mongols and even the Black death- DOZENS of MILLIONS of us died and as a result we evolved. But i ask HOW exactly did the fucking NIGGERS in Africa and Australia suffer??? They were never invaded by someone and they never experienced a Pandemic.
In the 14.century when MILLIONS of Europeans died because of the Black death, the fucking NIGGERS were eating bananas and enjoing their time at the beach. The NIGGER NEVER EVER EVOLVED. How!! He had no Problems to solve no threats to survive. He just lived from day to day without any headaches.
Is it surprising that after Millenia of evolving we were a Million times superior to them when we came and just took the whole continent? Thats the reason why the NIGGER will always be inferior to us- because untill 1500 he didnt achieve anything and since 1500 everything he achieved was "sponsored" by the white race. Even a civilised NIGGER like Obama is 5000 years of development behind us- and now he is in command of the USA- god may help us all!!!!!!!!!!

Ps: For all thouse fucking Nigger lovers who will attack this comment- Im not a German- im of slavic origin so im not a Nazi- and my iq is around 140 so you cant argue that this is written by a dumbass who doesnt understand anything.

Mack Major #fundie facebook.com

Few things are more powerful on this Earth than a beautiful-looking woman! Beauty is a gift given by God. Use it the wrong way and it can lead many men (and women) astray.

But something amazing happens when a beautiful looking woman surrenders that beauty to the Lord and allows God to do a clean work in her life.

God redeems those good looks: and instead of it being used to seduce or entice others into destruction, it's used to uplift, inspire, to lighten up an entire room and cause others to see the attributes of Christ displayed through the beauty of that person.

You don't need tats, elaborate hairstyles and tight-fitting clothing to display your beauty. Those things often take away from a woman's real beauty and become a distraction.

God made you good-looking on purpose, because your good looks reflect His own beauty. Surrender your beauty to Jesus Christ today. And let Jesus show you just how beautiful you can really be when you give your full and total self to Him.

And if you're wondering why I didn't put an image with this one: if you're that beautiful woman this post is talking about, YOUR image belongs here! Just imagine your own picture at the top of this post. God bless.

"Don't be concerned about the outward beauty of fancy hairstyles, expensive jewelry, or beautiful clothes. You should clothe yourselves instead with the beauty that comes from within, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is so precious to God." 1 Peter 3:3-4

"Likewise, I want the women to adorn themselves with respectable apparel, with modesty, and with self-control, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, but with good deeds, as is proper for women who profess to worship God." 1 Timothy 2:9-10

Dark days #fundie christiannews.net

I usually do not reply to your kind (libs;) however, for a reason/reasons I do not understand, I will reply to you, and probably not again.
You lie when you say you want to hear an explanation. What you want to do is be given a platform to argue, to mock truth, and promote confusion, lies, corruption, destruction, and death.
Beside these things, you lack the capacity to recognize truth when exposed to it. This is happening to you because you have already chosen to hate God; subsequently, you must hate truth. As Jesus (God) repetitively highlighted, all of us are blind and deaf to truth until God himself heals us. There is no way for anyone to enlighten anyone who clings to their hatred of God. You display haughtiness and mockery.
Telling you the truth before you become humble is a lot like watering a rock.

matthewr1 #fundie christianpost.com

[On the alleged evils of church promotions involving gas buydowns, free gas cards, etc.]

"He called the gas promotions in general 'a clever tool.' 'There are a lot of worse things that people can be doing in life than getting people to come to church'"

I agree, such as offering 'free prescription medication', now that's just enticing people to come. Oh the desperation of a crossless church without Christ. A church where biblical standards have been, all but by name, been thrown out. A church who's rule of measure is Heathendom!

Oh the sore tides of judgement are rolling in! Any church who's built their foundations on the sands of Heathendom will be washed away in the sea of the kingdom of Antichrist. Repent, therefore or perish!

God_of_the_Winds #fundie reddit.com

You guys are the last bastion of hope

I'm talking about the good incels, not the degenerate types "volcel if you wouldn't" or "foids deserve to die" types.

By exclusion, you have been spared the corruption that befalls those who are "accepted" into society. The people throw away their dignity and soul to confirm to what is "acceptable" by their "peers". Destroying their themeselves in the process without realizing it. All because the average person by nature is gullible and put their trust into what they perceive has "authority", even if that authority shows signs of corruption, they will ignore it, bury their head in the sand, and hope everything is okay, because they don't want to be the one to make the effort to question it or change it.

As a consequence, the world before you is the result. I could go into detail about where and how the corruption starts, and I haven't seen anybody even on this forum realize where it begins.

That is why normies will never understand your pain, and will refuse to acknowledge it, because then it invalidates their own good experiences, it shows them that it was all chance and not the norm. They didn't do anything to earn their good life, they where simply born into it.

A truly good person is good, DESPITE having a terrible life. Most of these normies would be hateful human beings if they so much as experienced even a quarter of your suffering. The fact that they act without even making the effort to understand your life is proof of this.

They've had it relatively easy all their life, and will never make an effort for what is truly good, only virtue signaling to meet their "good" quota. Giving up good thoughts so that the world will be a better place, instead of taking action and making actual effort to do so.

It's the same reason why they automatically assume any homeless person they see is a drugatic or got to that point on purpose. They project their easy life unto anybody, and think "oh, he must have had the same life experiences as me and must have gotten there by his own fault", It takes off the responsibility from them from having to do an actual good deed if they perceive the person as "bad".

The fact that you can post such non-pc subjects and not confirm to the taint of societal constructs such as cuckoldry, gas lighting, and other similar acitivities, as well as being able to call out the lies that enslave the social lives of normies shows that you are the last bastion of hope left. The last group that hasn't been absorbed into the corruption collective.

The price you paid to get here might have been big, but I believe it makes you better than any of these lifeless normies that must live in delusion to get by.

Mack Major #fundie edendecoded.com

The rise of homosexuality, promiscuity, gang violence, fatherlessness, lesbianism and single motherhood within the African-American community is directly attributed to GODDESS WORSHIP.

When you watch porn, you're unwittingly engaging in goddess worship. You're subjecting yourself to the worship of Cerces: Mama Wata: Yemonja. (I will use these names interchangeably throughout this article).

This is why in all porn movies (gay porn being the exception), the woman is always the starring attraction. Everything centers around her. This is because Mama Wata operates through goddess sensuality. The porn industry itself is highly occult in nature: and its purpose is to make money off people while opening them up for demonic visitation and infiltration through sex.

Here's something else to consider: Notice how whenever people - particularly women - get near a beach or some other body of water, they tend to want to get almost naked? Why the desire to show one's body so openly to others, specifically around water?

My contention is that the spirit of Yemonja is behind it. This demon is also behind the whole strong-independent-single mother phenomenon among many black women in the United States today. Most single black mothers and their children are under the powerful control of this marine spirit.

Yemonja is also behind the rise of homosexuality and lesbianism among so many black Americans. This is the goddess of single mothers, fatherless kids, female sensuality and weak effeminate men.

When a person enters into a covenant with this spirit, the children of the single mother becomes the property of Mama Wata.

To secure worship from them, this spirit leads the children into becoming emotionally-driven or effeminate males (if they're sons), and sexually promiscuous and domineering females (if they're daughters).

Mama Wata has specific colors that are worn by her more open followers. Those colors are aquamarine blue and sea green. Have you noticed a proliferation of women (and effeminate guys) dyeing their hair those exact same colors lately?

Sea shells worn as jewelry and hair adornments are another tell-tale sign of this spirit's direct influence within society today. This is because Mama Wata/Yemonja is known as the water spirit, meaning it is believed to dwell in or has its base of operation within bodies of water.

Mama Wata is personified as a mermaid spirit.

How does one enter into a covenant with this demonic creature? It mainly happens through sex! Particularly through engaging in fornication, adultery, masturbation, watching porn, visiting strip clubs, watching strippers and homosexual acts. Sex is the initiation ritual that brings one into covenant agreement with Mama Wata.

I've been warning you for some time that sexual sin is nothing to play around with! It's never just harmless pleasure. That's what this demon wants you to think, to make it easier to gain control over your life. When you have sex outside of wedlock, you are forming a covenant with demons.

This is the one big secret that witches and those given over to the occult do NOT want you to understand. They initiate others into the occult through having sex with them: including CHRISTIANS!

Many of you don't realize it: but this demonic spirit is the very reason why so many of you struggle to get into a relationship that's worth having.

It's also one of the main demonic principalities behind the high crime, incarceration and murder rates among African-American males. It's behind the gang confederacy in Chicago known as Folk Nation, which includes the GD, Black Gangster Disciples and the Latin Disciples. They use those colors because those are Mama Watas colors! These gangs are responsible for a large portion of the violent murders that has plagued Chicago's black and Latino communities in recent times.

Yemonja will always seek to claim her children back: even if it's by death. And it's the reason behind so many men being unable to find financial security or to maintain gainful employment.

All these are negative side effects of making covenants with demons.

Sidenote: All attempts at black unity and upliftment will fail miserably unless this demon principality is dealt with first. We cannot solve our physical problems until we first conquer our spiritual nemesis.

Many of you are yoked to Mama Wata, whether intentionally or not. And now you must get unyoked. Only the mighty power of Jesus Christ can set you free.

To combat this notorious demon, a person needs to give their full heart and allegiance to Jesus Christ. The sinful lifestyle needs to be completely abandoned without reservation. One needs to be baptized in water. And they need to seek God for the baptism and in filling of the Holy Ghost.

Allen West #conspiracy huffingtonpost.com

WASHINGTON -- As many as 80 House Democrats are communists, according to Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.).

West warned constituents at a Tuesday town hall event that he's "heard" that dozens of his Democratic colleagues in the House are members of the Communist Party, the Palm Beach Post reported. West wouldn't elaborate beyond that, however, and didn't offer up any names. There are currently 190 House Democrats.

A request for comment from West's spokeswoman was not immediately returned.

J Sav #wingnut #racist youtube.com

RE: Democrats Virtue Signal BACKFIRES, They Accidentally Wear Slave Trader Garments

I lived in Accra Ghana for 10 years! They literally don’t understand the whole racism thing in America, because they are well aware that they sold their own people, there was a historic slave castle in Accra right on the water, there was a beautiful restaurant right next to it, we’d eat there all the time, and my local Ghanaian friends gave me very extensive history lessons, and they are still ashamed of their history, they don’t blame Europeans they blame themselves!!!!

Ghana is a lovely place. Sure, it's backwards by western standards, especially in the north, but the people are friendly towards outsiders and I never experienced any crime or racism.

neither did I, the Ghanaian people are amazing, and they don’t hate White people due to indoctrination, they truly don’t, ive only been as far north as kumasi and that’s basically not even central, the north is where they got me aardvarks to export, a shitty west African country is Togo, never liked going there, people were very rude, Benin as well not so great, nothing like Ghana, it truly stands out in west Africa! Labadi beach was beautiful, koala super maker in osu was another thing that made you feel at home! If shit ever completely turns to shit in the US I’m going to Ghana, I never once felt unsafe and I knew Accra so well like my childhood hometown!

They are ashamed for there history but white Americans did terrible things to black people for centuries. Do try and water it down man. Thats how things go south.

yep and Muslim countries are still doing it! And so are African countries, and China has concentration camps, white countries saw the error of their ways and fixed it! If America is so racist, and white countries are sooooooo racist, why do brown people put everything on the line to get here🤔 you know where I’d never actually go??? South Africa because they are racist against White people!!!

FoJC_Forever #fundie christiannews.net

Scientists don't have a clue how the universe was created (formed). They are like children in a sandbox marveling over the color of sand and how it reacts to water. Those who trust in science, trust in incomplete and false knowledge. Only through Faith can we see and understand how the universe was created. Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God, Jesus (the) Christ.

Through the Word of God the universe was created, and by the Word of God it remains. By the Word of God it will be changed, and only those who know Jesus (the) Christ will be transformed to live in the New Heavens and New Earth.

Follow Jesus, find Salvation.

OriginalBigWhite #fundie imdb.com

I have and still scoff at the notion that there is water on Mars. I also think its hilarious that Evolutionists are the ones trying to prove water on other planets 'as if' they need only do that and they can presume Evolution has happened there too.
And,
I had a huge laugh when, desperately trying to hype the public into giving up tax money, Mars rover people suddenly declared Canyons on Mars and then insisted that was a sure sign of huge floods...
....OH DAMN.... woops... they just conceded to the Genesis people back here on Earth lol.
In their moment of greed they didn't realize they were admitting Kent Hovind was right all along lol!

Mharvey #fundie absolutewrite.com


There is a particularly sordid trial underway in Manhattan right now. A cop is on trial for allegedly planning to kidnap and murder his wife and then to eat her. The wife discovered quite by accident that he was secretly into what's being called the "extreme fetish world" of cannibal fantasies, and that she found e-mails where he was getting suggestions from a UK man on how to go about achieving the most advantageous style of torture and death.

He was also a member of several web sites and chat rooms which feature this kind of fetish, and where he communicated extensively with other like-libido'ed individuals, gathering ideas on how to succeed.
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/26/nyregion/gilberto-valles-wife-testifies-as-trial-starts-in-cannibal-case.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

A year ago, I would have agreed with PD. Probably guilty, throw him to the birds, but just last year, I got a big taste of the fetish community. I recently was with someone who was into the extreme fetish thing and, once I put my own skepticism aside, I honestly couldn't fault these people for what they do. These parties within "the scene", despite having some pretty morbid stuff happen that you just don't tell Mom about, were otherwise extremely disciplined and well-behaved. As an example: There might be someone being lashed to bloody ribbons down in the basement, next to someone enacting a rape fantasy... but if you so much as laid a finger on someone without permission, you were asked to leave. If you even appeared visibly drunk, you were also asked to leave.

Despite these people having some *freakish* dark sides (one guy got off on tying people down and hitting people with a tazer), I was surprised how disciplined and level-headed they were outside of the scene they were acting. A woman taught me the finer arts of whipping someone with a cat-o-nine tails, and during the instruction she asked: "May I make contact with you?" and got my okay before putting her hand on mine to adjust my grip and show me how to flick my wrist. It was just so surprising how many rules were actively enforced to insure everyone's safety during these events.

As a result of my short experience with this scene (it ultimately wasn't for me), I have nonetheless learned never to judge someone based on the fantasies they have... no matter how dark, twisted or morbid. With very very rare exceptions, I just don't think they are indicative of how a person actually conducts themselves in a setting where their fantasies are not appropriate.

But again, this is going beyond that and violated those safeties. He did not ask the other people involved if he had their permission. He did not get that at all. He didn't have any safeties installed or consent.

So your comparison is not an apt one. It's merely talking about people living their fetishes within a structured safety net.

Apples and oranges.

But did he kidnap her and roast her liver with fava beans and a nice chianti? Did he even lay a finger on her? If not, then, the comparison is an apt one because his fantasy didn't require her to be an active participant, so why would he need safeties or consent? Her only role in the fantasy is to simply exist. For all we know, his fantasy needs were met simply by planning it all out.

Look, if I found out someone I was dating was corresponding in the UK about cannibalizing me... I would be freaked out too. I'm not unsympathetic to that. That's probably just too much and I'd probably leave that relationship in a New York minute.

All I'm saying is that, based on my experiences, someone's fantasy life rarely crosses over into their actual one. I would have a very hard time convicting this guy of criminal conspiracy. To me, they're only guilty of requiring their significant other to be in the top 1% of open freaking minds for a relationship to ever work.

We are not discussing fetishes in general, nor the people who have fetishes. We are discussing the ethics of this one particular person and his activities. It is clear he let his fetish interests blur into the rest of his life because he involved his wife and other people in his fetish play without their permission, and he illegally used confidential information from his work as a cop in his fetish play. By the standard you yourself offer, what he did is not okay.

He didn't involve her though - she involved herself when she violated his privacy and read all his private e-mail, search history and chat logs. If you don't trust a person enough not to snoop into every private E-mail, Text or chat log they've ever had, it's time to leave them anyway.

As for whether he really murdered his wife, that's not even the okay-ness line you offer us. Okay-ness in fetish communities is defined by consent. People have to agree to engage in the play. If they don't, then it is not okay. In this case, the play was elaborate and highly detailed online role-play with strangers. He involved his wife and other real people in that play, to the extent of posting their real pictures and real information about their lives and movements. He never told them he was doing so, much less get their permission to do so. That is involving them in the fetish play without permission. Not okay.

They have to agree to play if that's what they're actually doing... playing. Until the wife was actually chained up and partially devoured, she's not "playing". I mean, heck, by that standard... if you want to masturbate while thinking of someone, you have to E-Mail them first and get their consent. Is that really what we should be doing? If I don't, is it Conspiracy to Commit Sexual Assault?

James Rink #conspiracy #ufo #crackpot supersoldiertalk.com

My Life In The Secret Space Program

My name is Bruce and I was in a black ops sniper group called Wraith in MARSOC in the Marines from 2008 to 2017, then I was in a black ops private Military from 2017 to 2018. This is my story. When I was a little kid in the 90s, I was abducted by Grays. I remember that it was at night and I was being pulled up by a tractor beam. I went through the ceiling. I remember seeing my parent’s house at night below me. A few of the lights were on. I then was facing the ship as I was coming toward it. It was a huge silver flying saucer that was about eighty feet across. I then remember being on the ship in orbit above the Earth. Because I have remote viewing, I see the ship in third person. I saw the ship and the Earth, and the stars in the background. The Earth was at the bottom left of my vision and the Sunlight was coming up over the horizon.
I was laying on a table in a round room that was whitish silver, and there was a cylindrical wall around it. There were four Grays standing there staring at me, and I was on an operating table. I don’t remember being operated on. I also saw porthole windows on the walls all around the room. In them, I saw the stars in the background, and there were little silver spherical drones going to and fro. They abducted me again many times from when I was fourteen to fifteen, and every time I would wake up with nose bleeds. Most of the time, I was above the Earth in orbit in varying degrees of distance; and there were a few times that I was in interstellar space past Proxima Centauri but not to the fourth closest star to us. Also from when I was a little kid up until I was seventeen, the Military would abduct me and take me to an underground base for training. I first got my memories of that when I was fourteen. I had a dream when I was fourteen that I was lying in bed, sleeping in the middle of the night when a whiteish blue rotating oval portal appeared on my open closet door. It was slowly rotating to the left of my vision and it had little streamers on it. An old man with gray hair who was wearing a black suit stepped through the portal and moved to the side and stared at me. He looked very much like Ben Rich, the former head of Lockheed Skunkworks. After that, a Marine wearing digital camo came through and stared at me. After that, I was on a super advanced mag leveled small transport with other kids. It was in silver and white and in an angular egg shape, and it was traveling at extremely fast speed. After that, I was in a super advanced deep underground Military base and me and the other kids were being trained for combat. That older guy with gray hair was the head of the whole thing. We did live fire training with regular guns, hand to hand combat, we shot what looked like experimental energy, sci fi guns, and trained our third eye. There were times when we were told to meditate together in a dark room with purple crystals taped to our foreheads, and we listened to isochornic tones. There was also a girl there that had telekinesis. I remember that there was a buffed up black guy that was our trainer and he was really hard on us sometimes and the older white guy always got onto him. I also put on a headset and had to fight aliens in fully immersive simulations, and the helmet was connected by thick capes that went to something on the ceiling. The most traumatizing thing that happened to me was that there were times that I was put in a deprivation chamber and in a tank underwater with a small breathing apparatus and I was told to stay calm after they had closed a lid on me and I was in total darkness, so I was not abused.
[…]
When I was eighteen, I was sent to Mars. The Military pulled up to my house, shot an anomaly into my room where I was at, and came in the house and activated me, then restored my memories. Then they took me to base. I was given my contacts that I put in my eyes, then I was hooked up to the exoskeleton. I was then injected with the two fluids, then I boarded a small transport craft that was black and shaped like a kind of stretched out pyramid laid on its side. There was a pilot and three seats in the back. After that, the craft went to above Earth orbit to a huge ship that was sitting at a spacedock. It was a ship that the Marines have in a separate Secret Space Program that they have where they patrol between Earth and Mars. It was about a mile long, tactical digital black, had red and white lights, and it had huge wings on the sides that stretched way out and tapered off. It was called the USS Vengeance (United States Starship Vengeance) and it had rows and rows, and rows of defenses on the wings that fired bullets, rockets, and beam-type weapons; and it had farce fields. On the inside, it was tactile digital black as well, and it had very dim red and white lights. Most of the Marines wore digital woodland camo, and the commander and higher up officers wore digital desert. It had glass windows, but most of the windows were actually screens that projected the outside of the ship on the inside, so it acted like a window. I remember that it looked like two gray outlines of a TV that was round at the edges, and it just looked like a rubber outline of a TV on the wall, and in the center was just the wall, but it was actually projecting the wall when it was on standby. And there was a button at the bottom left that I could press, and when it would be pressed, the image would disappear in little black blotches, and then they would disappear really fast and it would look like a section of the wall would just disappear and you could see out into space.

The commander called all of us Wraith members to the briefing room. He had gray hair. It felt very much like Starship Troopers. He stood in front of us and told us the basics of the Secret Space Program over all, that history of the Solar System, what is going on on Earth, and why were were going to Mars. I was briefed that there were many SSPs. I was told that every branch of the Military has their own, there are different patrol groups that patrol the Solar System and other systems as well, there is that group that the Marines have that is one of them, SSPs that other Countries have, an Illuminati type group that own most of the infrastructure out there that experiment with cybernetics in a bad way, and they are really into the occult, a Nazi group that works with the Draco, rogue SSPs, and many others that I don’t exactly remember. I was told that the Solar System had a super advanced civilization that have spread out across the Solar System from some planet, but they destroyed themselves and the planet they were on called Tiamat, that is now what we call the Asteroid Belt, and we haven’t found them yet. Also that the Earth had been free for many years, until the Draco arrived and used the Illuminati to enslave the planet. And we were going to Mars because the Draco had started attacking Human Military bases there on a bigger scale than normal.

As he was talking and pacing the room, these huge pieces of glass rose up from black raised up platforms that were on the floor in rows in front of us. They were cut sharply in angles at the top edges and when they had risen all the way up, they turned on and displayed pictures and information on different races. There were two pictures for each race, like profiles, and rows and rows of text below them. I was briefed on the Grays, the Alpha Draconians, the Mantis, the Connonains which are a humanoid doglike race, a blatlike race, the Lyrans, one Human looking group, a raptor race, and many other races that I can’t exactly remember. The Grays had been enslaved by their technology and a lot of them were cybernetic. Their race had been dying out and they had made clones, but that wasn’t working, so they abducted Humans to create hybrids to sustain their race. The Alpha Draconians are racists who believe that they are the master race in the Universe, and they went around and conquered and supplanted other reptilian races, and put them in their ranks. They have a pyramid cast system and their top people are fourteen feet tall white Draco that have wings and they are called Royal White Draco. I don’t remember anything about the Mantis. The Lyrans are huge humanoid lions who are spiritual Militarists and they are on our side. The Connonians are a huge buffed up humanoid doglike race that are spiritual Militarists. They are on our side. I don’t remember the story with the other races. I remember that most of them were reptilians and they were red colored,and the other ones were green. We were told that although we were fighting the Draco, the biggest threat is actually evil alien AI that would either be infected by a virus, be sentient, or be demonically possessed. I was also told about and given a medical device called a tourniquet that was like a black tube that had another black tube of rubber over it, and it had a needle that would come out of the bottom. When it would be used, it would instantly partially heal and seal up wounds. I was also told about another medical technology that was a holograhic medical regeneration bed that soldiers could lay down in, and it would heal them. It had large gel packs on it, and a clear sheet over that, and if a soldier’s arm was blown off at the elbow, he could lay in it and it would project an orange colored, gridded hologram of the arm down to the cellular level, and it would completely heal the arm in a matter of hours.

We were then given a tour of the ship and we were given galsspads to read whenever we wanted. It looked like a long rectangle, and when it would turn on, it would display rows of text in white. The girl that I saw in the first training area when I was a kid asked one of the crew if there were any androids on the ship. The guys said that there weren’t, but on some ships in that patrol group, there were androids in their crews. The front part of their heads are human, and the back is all robotic parts, and their voices are low, they carry, and they sound electric. I remember that they also had their own money. It looked like dollars, except that it had a lot more brown in it, and they had faces on them that were of different people. I was also given an ID card that I would use to clock in and out with. It had a special access clearance, my picture and info on it, and it had a black jell pack on it that contained nanites. It was so it could protect ships from getting viruses. I saw many parts of the ship, I remember that the engine looked like huge black metal spheres that were stuck together at odd angles, and there were multiple rectangular and cylindrical shaped housings stuck on them in random spots; and behind all that was a giant vertical rectangle, and underneath all that, there was a purple crystal. The ships main fuel source was zero point energy, and it had nuclear, solar, and chemical thrusters as a backup just encase something happened and they got lost. It used tachyons and quantum entanglement when it traveled. It could go faster than light and it could go intergalactic. I remember that the bridge was shaped like a forward facing rectangle. There were people on computers on the sides toward the front that wrapped around toward the front door. There was the commander standing with his hands behind his back way toward the front of the bridge, a small row of people on computers right in front of him, and the pilot at the front. The pilot operated manual controls, but he also had a headset and a glove that he could wear and he could pilot the ship with his mind. The glove was black and it had glowing blue lights on on the finger tips. It had four small windows up top on the sides of the front of the room. And a huge screen in the center.

After that, we went to Mars. The trip only took fifteen seconds. Mars is not red and it is not the dead planet that NASA wants people to think. It had a blue sky and it looked like the Arizona desert. It also is populated with many races, wildlife, had trees, bodies of water, and is very much like Earth. There is oxygen on it too that is breathable for a short time in the polar regions. The planet was once a lot more like Earth in the past, but there was a nuclear war there and the atmosphere got really messed up, but it is in the process of getting back to the way it was before.

I remember that Wraith has a base on Mars that looked like a smaller outpost and the commander was older with short gray hair and he was kind of muscular, with a scar on his face. We were in the Northern Polar region. I remember that I had digital tan power armor that had a pitch black visor on the helmet that displayed red information and a redicle in red and it acted as my spotter; and I used a sniper rifle that looked very much like the Barrett .50 Cal, but it was a little bigger and it shot a bigger round that had a black casing. The bullet was brass colored and after it would penetrate a target, the top layer of the bullet would break up in pieces and create a shockwave effect. It was designed to kill Alpha Draconians.

I remember very vividly some battles that were going on in a valley. I remember seeing human Marines and Draconians fighting each other far ahead of me toward the edge of the valley. I saw both people dying on both sides. I remember being way off in the background on a rooftop and sniping Draco as the battle was going on. The Draconian soldiers were dark green, seven to eight foot tall humanoid crocodiles. I remember shooting them. Most of them wore helmets, but some didn’t. And there were a few that I shot in the neck near the shoulder a few times and I saw a shockwave effect and they had a huge hole in their neck and blood sprayed everywhere. There were also times when I was with other Wraith members and we sniped Draconians together, and times when we had to take out key Draconoian Military leaders and sometimes do sync shots on them. There was one time when three of us had to take out three Draconian Military leaders in the middle of the night when it was raining and it was windy. They were walking around and talking. They were inside some kind of base that was up on a higher level off the ground, and they were inside some kind of pressurized room because they didn’t have any helmets on. We did a sync shot at the same time and shot through the glass and killed them. The were also two times when I killed Draconian generals with remote influencing. I remember that I was in a small cylindrical outpost looking building and I was standing in the central room facing a large window outside. Outside, I could see the Martian surface and the sand getting kicked up by the soft wind and the blue sky, remember that I was far away from my target, but I could see him because I have remote viewing. I could see that he was in a pressurized room in a base that they had built. He didn’t have his helmet on and I could see his reptilian face. I remember moving my right hand up in the air and balling it into a fist, then taking it down and unfolding my fist. I made him take out a long green knife and stab himself in the chest with it, and shove the blade through. I did the same thing and made the other general shoot himself in the head with his hand gun, I also made a Draconian politician that was on Mars shoot himself with a handgun, too.

For eight years, the Military would pick me up, take me to Mars, and wipe my memories, and take me back home. Sometimes, it was by the same small transport craft to the USS Vengeance and that would take me to Mars; and sometimes, if the ship wasn’t near Earth, the transport would take me all the way to Mars. I wasn’t in any space battles, but I remember that sometimes when I was boarding the carrier that I saw that it had bullet holes, missile impacts, and glowing red beam marks on the hull that were still smoking. I also remember having dreams of a bald Military man debriefing me, but it was more like an interrogation, and dreams of doctors injecting me with with needles. I also remember seeing dark green helicopters on Mars that had enclosed blades in rings like on the movie Avatar, except that the connector pieces to the rings were a little shorter, and they had no landing gear. I also saw large white drones that moved slowly along the sky, searching for targets. The Draconian ships were dark green, had wings that bent forward and downward, and when you would look at them from certain angles, they would change color and turn purple in some areas. In total, I killed 78 Alpha Draconians.

After that, I joined a black ops private Military called Hammerhead and I was with them for a year. They go after gun and drug runners, and they hunt down and kill Illuminati and Shadow Government soldiers. We wore a round black and blue patch that had a Hammerhead shark on it and it read: Hammerhead in white at the top. I remember that they have a base somewhere in America that looks like a completely blacked out unmarked building, and it goes underground, too. It has torsion field cannons on the roof for defenses.

ThePottersClay #fundie youtube.com

I believe the bible is the inspired word of God and nothing should be added or taken away from it. Man should never twist God's word to fit his own world view because the wisdom of this world is foolishness to God.

God created the Sun, Moon, and stars on the fourth day, however grass, fruit, trees, and all other vegetation were created on day three... The bible mentions God created two great lights, the greater to rule the day and the lesser to rule the night, which I believe means exactly what it says "Two" great lights, meaning the moon is giving it's own light. Man tells us the moon is a giant rock reflecting the first "great light".

We are told the sun, moon, and stars are for signs and seasons and to "give light on the earth". That means the stars were created to light the earth like it says, it also means they are considered "lesser lights" seeing as how there were only two "great lights". Man tells us stars are enormous, a lot of which are much larger than our own sun and millions of times larger than the earth light years away all with solar systems of their own. Does it make sense that God created a vast infinite universe including all stars, planets, and galaxies on day four but spent the rest of creation week focusing on the earth making plants, animals, and people? :) The stars are much smaller and much closer than modern day monkey man science would have us believe, and they've been placed above our head as God's giant celestial clock so when we "look up" we know what time it is.

There are several places in the bible that tell us one day the stars will fall to the earth, in fact Jesus himself tells us this. This is a problem for me, because it really paints us into a corner and we only have so many options to believe. Either A: Jesus did not know what stars were, which I don't believe because he is God and most definitely knows what stars are. Or B: Jesus knew what stars were, he even said the word that meant stars, but really he meant asteroids/comets/and meteors. I don't believe this either, because Jesus himself is the truth and would not lie to his disciples or deceive them in any way saying one thing but meaning something else. Or C: Jesus knew exactly what the stars were and meant that near the end of days stars would literally begin to fall out of their place in the firmament above to the earth below. Here again if we listen to man, it would be like a trillions of flaming beach balls hitting a single grain of sand. The wisdom of this world is foolishness to God.

In Joshua 10 12-14 and Isaiah 38 7-8 we see something. The Lord stops the sun from going down a full day in Joshua, and makes the sundial go backwards 10 degrees in Isaiah. Both of these instances would mean the globe earth stopped it's rotation completely and in Isaiah's case rotated backwards in order for the sun to do this in the sky. The truth is the earth is flat and stationary and the much smaller and closer sun circling over head stopped, and in Isaiah's case went backwards.

How bout the tower of Babel? If the world was a spinning globe why didn't God just let them build it? They couldn't have survived outer-space. Why was Nimrod trying to build it for that matter, wouldn't the enemy at least know it was a globe? Wouldn't the tower eventually have been destroyed when reaching the point where the 1038mph atmosphere that's spinning with the earth meets the non rotating vacuum of space? Aren't the temperatures up there pretty inhospitable as well? Seems to me if things are like we are told in science the problem would have solved itself but instead God had to intervene. The truth is they were trying reach the firmament, and God knew what they were trying to do and he stopped them.

Once you realize the truth you'll read the entire bible with new eyes. Many atheist have been saved do to finding out the truth that we are in-deed created, praise God! Even though the flat earth is unconventional, God can use anything to bring lost sheep into the fold and will. If you really look into it, you will see what Satan has done, and what our father is doing :)

mike #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

I think our creators are super advanced aliens from another dimension and i believe they are evil...

Some of their fantastically advanced creations we call our rain,wind and snow...

I think those evil aliens occasionally adjust the wattage of their super advanced,holographic light bulb we call the sun with some kind of remotely operated,super advanced computer controlled dimmer switch,creating advancing and retreating ice ages in the process and so those diabolic entities are directly responsible for our mass extinctions and natural disasters...

Whenever they get bored playing with certain species, obliviously living and dying beneath an artifical sun thats suspended above the aliens massive petri dish,human soul farm terrarium science experiment we call earths biosphere...

Just like we do with the heat lights that so many of us hang up inside our little glass tanks,shining down to illuminate and warm the oblivious little pets we like to keep trapped and controlled within them...

And that holographically projected artificial sun up there in the holographic sky is a lot smaller and much closer that we are misled to believe it is...

I believe that those who rule and control us,the royal bloodline elites throughout the ages,were and still are are well aware of whats really going on and they know whos running this show we call life and death on earth and those elites are implicitly involved in aiding and abetting the super advanced evil aliens,who command our human leaders to harvest ever more human souls through fabricated wars and orchestrated genocides...

and unfortunately,that very well may be the brutal truth of our unknown reality...

Anonymous contributor #fundie demonbuster.com

Here are other things I could do with the power of the devil.

1. Just to scare normal people, make the ouiji board pointer fly in the air and land on someone.
2. Tell people what they were thinking and say their words in unison with them while they speak.
3. Make candles light by thought while normal people were playing seance.
4. Floor turning ice cold in the middle of hot weather when calling spirits forth to attend seances. Also, cold wind blowing through a room - strong wind.
5. Pointing index finger at ones who scoff or defy power - terror would pierce them and they would flee screaming, sometimes never regaining sanity.
6. Causing accidents, rashes, confusion, coughing, etc. when sending curses on people.
7. Hearing male voices speaking out of women or vice-versa during seances or any other time of calling forth of demons.
8. Satan himself talking on the ouiji board to ones he wanted - telling all their life and terrifying them if they did not agree to be his.
9. White, filmy beings floating through the house, dancing in circles in the yard - many of them.
10. Flies covering windows in the coldest of winter - unnatural hum.
11. Walls sweating and hot in winter - like a fire in them.
12. Voices talking muffled conversations - coming from closets, drains, heat vents, stuffed animals, toys, dolls.
13. ALL PRANKS ARE DEMONIC - demons hide in joking and pulling pranks.
14. Unusual odors - gas, oil, sewer, smoke, electrical fire, etc.
15. Virtually anything is possible in the realm of the occult, if it is done for the purpose of fear, hatred, pranks, power and control. If done to be nice, demons will not obey.
16. Turning lights on and off without touching switches.
17. Causing people to feel as though bugs are crawling on them or snakes, mice, etc. are crawling on them.

Mike King #racist tomatobubble.com

NY Times: An Atlas of Upward Mobility Shows Paths Out of Poverty

By DAVID LEONHARDT, AMANDA COX and CLAIRE CAIN MILLER

A decades-old effort found that moving poor families to better neighborhoods did little to help them. A new look at the data suggests the opposite.

REBUTTAL BY

The Anti-New York Times

TRANSLATION: Get ready White suburbanites. Obongo's "sons" and "amigos" are coming to a 'cul de sac' near you.

All these decades of "studying" poverty, and the answer to "inequality" was right under our noses all along. Thanks to this latest "study" - the findings of which, according to the article, "have been presented to members of the Obama administration, as well as to Hillary Rodham Clinton and Jeb Bush, both of whom have signaled that mobility will be central themes of their 2016 presidential campaigns."

Be assured that this latest buzz-word - "mobility" - is not to be confused with the traditional methods of climbing the socio-economic ladder (hard work, discipline, frugality, patience etc.) In Marxified Amerika, such quaint old fashioned virtues are as outdated as knickerbockers and petticoats. In the abomination that is the Obama-Nation, "mobility" will be achieved simply by transplanting feral inmates from the inner-city into the suburbs (on the 'racist' suburban taxpayers' dime, of course). Sulzberger's hand-picked academics argue that the Welfare Queen's loud litter of fatherless pups will somehow magically transform into the Huxtable Family when we place them in the predominately White suburbs.

After the Los Angeles riots of 1992, the social engineers of Congress created an anti-poverty scheme called 'Moving to Opportunity'. It gave vouchers to help poor families move to better neighborhoods. As even this Slime's article confirms, the long-term results showed no significant improvement in either education or income. The idiot "intellectuals" were at a loss to explain why their scheme failed.

Now, from Manhattan's Mount Olympus comes the trumpeted word of a "new study" to contradict the old one. Typical! Harvard egg-head Raj Chety, the author of the study and protege of Harvard's Martin Feldstein (cough-cough), is quoted:

The data show we can do something about upward mobility. Every extra year of childhood spent in a better neighborhood seems to matter."

We are quite certain that Professor Chety's community will be exempted from the coming "cultural enrichment" that will be unleashed upon the middle-class suburbs. As with so many of these "studies", the great and good "intellectuals" who craft them are so blinded by their preconceived biases and well-meaning pipe dreams, that they fail to notice the inherent flaws and circular logic (illogic) embedded in their experiments. For example, the article reveals:

"Based on the earnings records of millions of families that moved with children, it finds that poor children who grow up in some cities and towns have sharply better odds of escaping poverty than similar poor children elsewhere."

Mr. Chety, did it occur to you that the "families that moved" did so because they had already escaped poverty? In other words, the families did not achieve upward mobility because they moved. They moved because they achieved upward mobility! Having moved up as the result of hard work, focus and discipline, is it really so surprising that such parents would then pass those values onto their children, who then go on to become more successful adults?

Whether they are merely stupid or just plain evil, logic never seems to matter to these academic Lefties. David B. Grusky (cough-cough), director of the Center on Poverty and Inequality at Stanford University, adds his two-cents:

“This (study) delivers the most compelling evidence yet that neighborhoods matter in a really big way."

That's great, David. Why don't you adopt little Malik?

Of course, at the highest levels of America's PRC (Predatory Ruling Class), the "anti-poverty" spin for this totalitarian scheme has a much darker motive. The Globo-Zio elite couldn't give a rat's arse about the sanctified "poor". The goal here is the obliteration of White America (and Mother Europe). And this "study" fits in perfectly with what we already know about Obongo's plans to flood the suburbs with free-loaders. From U.S. News & World Report, 2013 - Read it and weep:

HUD Proposes Plan to Racially, Economically Integrate Neighborhoods

The Department of Housing and Urban Development has proposed a rule to desegregate U.S. neighborhoods.

"The Department of Housing and Urban Development has proposed a new plan to change U.S. neighborhoods it says are racially imbalanced or are too tilted toward rich or poor, arguing the country's housing policies have not been effective at creating the kind of integrated communities the agency had hoped for.

The proposed federal rule, called "Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing," is currently under a 60-day public comment period. Though details of how the policy would specifically work are unclear, the rule says HUD would provide states, local governments and others who receive agency money with data and a geo-spatial tool to look at "patterns of integration and segregation; racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty; access to education, employment, low-poverty, transportation, and environmental health."

Oh Boobus Caucasianus Americanus (and Europithecus, Canadius and Australopithecus)! Has the mind-numbing and soul-crushing din of the Devil's Loud-speaker (TV) so dulled your mind and desensitized your heart to the point that you cannot hear the death-bells tolling, nor see the grim reaper of genocide approaching? Evidently so.

Cornelius Hunter #fundie evolutionnews.org

Yale's Steven Novella Argues with Michael Behe -- Here's Why Novella Is Wrong

Steven Novella, a neurologist and noted "skeptic" at Yale University School of Medicine, has commented on a recent Harvard University experiment for visualizing bacterial adaptation to antibiotics. In doing so, he argues with Michael Behe whose take on the subject was noted at Evolution News. Here is why Dr. Novella is wrong.

The Harvard researchers constructed a giant petri dish with spatially varying antibiotics to watch how bacteria adapt over time and space (the researchers came up with a great name for the experiment: The microbial evolution and growth arena [MEGA]-plate). And adapt they did. Those adaptations were instantly claimed as an example of evolution in action. The researchers wrote that the "MEGA-plate provides a versatile platform for studying microbial adaption and directly visualizing evolutionary dynamics" (emphasis added). And the press release informed the public that the experiment provided "A powerful, unvarnished visualization of bacterial movement, death, and survival; evolution at work, visible to the naked eye." Likewise, Novella called it "a nice demonstration of evolution at work in a limited context." There's only one problem: The experiment did not demonstrate evolution, it falsified evolution.

First off, Novella deserves some credit for acknowledging at least some limitations in the experiment's results:

Of course, this one piece of evidence does not "prove" something as complex and far ranging as the evolution of life on Earth.

Novella also deserves credit for acknowledging that evolutionary change that requires a few mutations, rather than merely one, is a big problem. Novella has solutions that he believes resolve this problem, but at least he acknowledges what too often is conveniently ignored.

What Novella does not acknowledge, however, is that bacteria adaptation research, over several decades now, has clearly shown non-evolutionary change. For instance, bacterial adaptation has often been found to be rapid, and sensitive to the environmental challenge. In other words, when we look at the details, we do not find the evolutionary model of random variation slowly bringing about change, but rather environmentally directed or influenced variation.

That is not evolution. And indeed, the Harvard experiment demonstrated, again, very rapid adaptation. In just ten days the bacteria adapted to high doses of lethal antibiotic. As one of the researchers commented, "This is a stunning demonstration of how quickly microbes evolve."

True, it is "stunning," but "evolve" is not the correct term. The microbes adapted.

The ability of organisms to adapt rapidly falls under the category of epigenetics, a term that encompasses a range of sophisticated mechanisms which promote adaptation which is sensitive to the environment. Given our knowledge of bacterial epigenetics, and how fast the bacteria responded in the Harvard experiment, it certainly is reasonable to think that epigenetics, of some sort, may have been at work.

Such epigenetic change is not a new facet of evolution, it contradicts evolution. Not only would such complex adaptation mechanisms be difficult to evolve via random mutations, they wouldn't provide fitness improvement, and so would not be selected for, even if they did somehow arise from mutations.

Epigenetic mechanisms respond to future, unforeseen conditions. Their very existence contradicts evolution. So the Harvard experiment, rather than demonstrating evolution in action, is probably yet another example of epigenetic-based adaptation. If so, it would contradict evolution.

Another problem, one that Michael Behe points out, is that it appears that most of the mutations that occurred in the experiment served to shutdown genes. In other words, the mutations broke things, they did not build things. This is another way to see that this does not fit the evolutionary model. It's devolution, not evolution. Novella begs to differ, and says Behe has made a big mistake:

Behe is wrong because there is no such thing as "devolution." Evolution is simply heritable change, any change, and that change can create more complexity or more simplicity. Further, altering a protein does not "degrade" it -- that notion is based on the false premise that there is a "correct" sequence of amino acids in any particular protein. Evolution just makes proteins different. Proteins perform "better" or "worse" only in so much that they contribute to the survival and reproduction of the individual. If it is better for the survival of the organism for an enzyme to be slower, then the slower enzyme is better for that organism.

First, Novella ignores the fact that many of the mutations introduced stop codons, and so did not merely slow an enzyme but rather shut it down altogether.

Secondly, it is not Behe here who is making the mistake, it is Novella. He says "Evolution is simply heritable change..." But this is an equivocation.

On the one hand, evolutionists want to say that shutting down or slowing a gene is "evolution," but on the other hand, they say that a fish turning into a giraffe is "evolution."

Unfortunately evolutionists routinely make this equivocation. This is because they don't think of it as an equivocation. In their adherence and promotion of the theory, the distinction is lost on them. All change just smears together in one big long process called evolution. You can see other examples of this here and here.

So the comments, press releases, and articles send a misleading message. Readers are told that the researchers have seen "evolution in action." The message is clear: This is evolution, the evolution. But it isn't. There is nothing in these findings that show us how a fish turns into a giraffe.

Multiple Mutations

As I mentioned, Novella also believes that evolution coming up with designs requiring multiple mutations is not a problem. His reasoning is that while this would be a problem if most mutations were harmful, they aren't. Most mutations are neutral, so evolutionary drift can introduce the many needed mutations, and once the set of required mutations are in place, then you have the new design.

This is a profound misunderstanding of the problem evolution faces. You can't evolve a protein, for example, with drift. That most mutations are neutral does not suddenly resolve the curse of dimensionality and resolve this astronomical search problem. There just is no free lunch.

Similarly, Novella makes yet another profound mistake involving what he calls "the lottery fallacy."

The first is basically the lottery fallacy - considering the odds of John Smith winning the lottery by chance alone and concluding it could not have happened by chance. Rather, you should consider the odds that anyone would win the lottery. This is actually pretty good. Behe looks at life on Earth and asks -- what are the odds that this specific pathway or protein or whatever evolved by chance alone. He is failing to consider that there may have been billions of possible solutions or pathways down which that creature's ancestors could have evolved. Species that failed to adapt either migrated to an environment in which they could survive, or they went extinct. In other words, Behe should not be asking what the odds are that this bit of complexity evolved, but rather what are the odds that any complexity evolved. It is difficult to know the number of potential complexities that never evolved -- that number may dwarf the odds of any one bit evolving. Right there Behe's entire premise is demolished...

This is a terribly flawed argument for several reasons. First, life needs proteins. All life that we know of needs proteins. Thousands of proteins.

Yet proteins are far beyond evolution's reach. It is true, per Novella's point, that there are a whole lot of ways to make a given protein. There are many, many different amino acid sequences that give you a globin. But "many, many" is like a grain of sand compared to the astronomical amino acid sequence search space. Again, there is no free lunch.

But Novella goes further than this, which brings us to the second flaw. Novella is not merely arguing there are many different ways to construct life as we know it. He is pointing out that there are, or at least there could be, a whole bunch of different ways to make life in the first place.

If you take them all together, you could have a pretty big set of possibilities. Perhaps it is astronomical. So what we got in this world -- the life forms we observe -- are not point designs in an otherwise lifeless design space. Rather, the design space could be chock full of life forms. And hence, the evolution of life becomes likely, and "Right there Behe's entire premise is demolished."

What Novella is arguing for here is unobservable. He is going far beyond science, into an imaginary philosophical world of maybes.

Not only is Novella clearly appealing to the unobservable, but even that doesn't work. At least for any common sense approach. There is no question that the design space is full of useless blobs of chemicals that do nothing. A speculative claim? No, that is what this thing called science has made abundantly clear to us. Even the simple case of a single protein reveals as much. Only a relatively few mutations to most proteins rob them of their function. Protein function is known to dramatically reduce as different amino acids are swapped in.

Of course this is all obvious to anyone who understands how things work. Sure, Novella may be right that there are other, unknown, solutions to life. But that isn't suddenly going to resolve evolution's astronomical search problem. The problem was never contingent on the life we observe being the only possible life forms possible

[Submitter's Note: Emphasis original]

Diana L. Rodriguez #fundie miamiherald.com

Others have spoken out harshly about the proposal [to build an adaptive facility for people with disabilities on Miami Beach], arguing that people with disabilities should be in a pool, not the ocean, that having them in the water would be a liability to the city, and that the facility would limit the public’s access to the beach.

“My specific concern is that we are benefiting special interests and limiting the right of the general public to use the beach and the park,” said resident Diana L. Rodriguez at a public hearing in April.

The tone of the debate has offended those who want to see people with disabilities have easier and more frequent access to the ocean. Conversely, they feel the facility will make the beach more inclusive, so the disabled and able-bodied can enjoy the ocean together.

“I think [their arguments] are just completely silly,” said Susan Solmon, a podiatric physician and clinical pharmacist who has benefited from the adaptive beach days. “They are made by people who are scared of something that they don’t know. I would encourage them to come out and be part of an adaptive beach day.”

Franck Kabele #fundie religionnewsblog.com

A priest has died after trying to demonstrate how Jesus walked on water.

Evangelist preacher Franck Kabele, 35, told his congregation he could repeat the biblical miracle.

But he drowned after walking out to sea from a beach in the capital Libreville in Gabon, west Africa.

One eyewitness said: “He told churchgoers he’d had a revelation that if he had enough faith, he could walk on water like Jesus.

“He took his congregation to the beach saying he would walk across the Komo estuary, which takes 20 minutes by boat.

“He walked into the water, which soon passed over his head and he never came back.”

Franck Kabele #fundie dailyrecord.co.uk

Evangelist preacher Franck Kabele, 35, told his congregation he could repeat the biblical miracle.

But he drowned after walking out to sea from a beach in the capital Libreville in Gabon, west Africa.

One eyewitness said: "He told churchgoers he'd had a revelation that if he had enough faith, he could walk on water like Jesus.

"He took his congregation to the beach saying he would walk across the Komo estuary, which takes 20 minutes by boat.

"He walked into the water, which soon passed over his head and he never came back."

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

Something hurtful happened to me the other day. I rarely bring my pedal steel guitar to the beach, but decided to bring it this day to the beach. I set it in the grass before the sand. It's about 500 feet from my car to the area where I was going to perform for free. I love sharing my music and letting the kids try to play the guitar. They learn something new. I always bring a bag full of Gospels of John to give away to others. I have a little portable 2-wheel dolly that I store in my car.

I had my $700 Fender Princeton Reverb amplifier and a milk crate with items inside, like my volume pedal and instrument cables. I tried to roll them both on the dolly over some tree roots, but it all fell over on the ground. My $700 amplifier hit the ground pretty hard but seemed ok. I stacked everything back onto the dolly and started to roll again, but it all fell over again and my amp hit the ground hard again. I heard a group of people burst out in laughter the second time everything fell. I looked right at them and they were starring at me. They were a family having a barbeque.

I walked by and told them that they shouldn't laugh when someone falls down. I quoted the Scripture about doing unto others as you'd have them do unto you. I quoted the Scripture which says if you've done it unto the least of these My brethren, then you've done it unto me. I walked away. I forgot something in the car and went back to get it. As I walked by they were laughing at me, mocking me. I forgot something else and went back again, and I heard them laughing at me again, mocking me. I was so mad and trying to keep my composure. I looked at them. I was so mad.

I grabbed my bag of Bibles and walked right up to their group. I kindly said, “Could I please give you some Gospels of John?” To my surprise they accepted them, but others wouldn't. So I left 4 laying on their portable table. There were about 20 of them, several adults and their children. I passed out about 10 Bibles. I said, “I didn't mean to snap at you before. It's just that nobody likes to be laughed at when they fall down. I know you weren't trying to be mean by laughing. God bless, have a good day” and then I kindly left. I diffused the situation. I overcame evil with good. I don't always do the right thing like that (I wish I did), but I sure want to do better and better with the Lord's help.

Trust The Lord To Avenge, Knowing That God Sees When People Mistreat Us

I love the following passage of Scripture. King David had commit adultery and murder. One of David's subjects and enemies, ran alongside David casting dirt and stones at him, willing to die he was so angry. One of David's men offers to kill the man. But David said to leave him alone. David reasoned that perhaps God would later bless him, seeing that this man had cursed David...

2nd Samuel 16:11-13, “And David said to Abishai, and to all his servants, Behold, my son, which came forth of my bowels, seeketh my life: how much more now may this Benjamite do it? let him alone, and let him curse; for the LORD hath bidden him. It may be that the LORD will look on mine affliction, and that the LORD will requite me good for his cursing this day. And as David and his men went by the way, Shimei went along on the hill's side over against him, and cursed as he went, and threw stones at him, and cast dust.”

I often think about this passage of Scripture when people are abusive, mean and rotten toward me. I know that God sees their evil toward me. God sees their hatred. God sees their jealousy, God sees their hypocrisy. God sees their wickedness. And so I leave the matter alone, trusting the Lord to avenge me as He promised in Romans 12:19, and believing that perhaps God may bless me in His wondrous mercy, in repayment for the unkindness, cruelty and cursing of my enemies. That is exactly what the Bible teaches here. If we avenge ourselves and try to get back at others, hurt them and attack them, then God won't do anything.

johncody #fundie factnet.org

I have never seen anything evolve, have you?

The Sea Shell I find up in the mountains is hundreds of millions of years old,,, ,, , looks just like the one you find on the beach today?

I guess it just plum forgot to evolve (lol)

For evolution to be true,
it would still be going-on today in an on-going process,, , meaning, we would still have things crawling out of the ocean in all different stages of evolution. But we dont do we.

Species do not change they never have and there is not one shred of evedence that they do, NOT one.

It is called Stasis, meaning, things simply do not change.

Faith #fundie evcforum.net

You can't HAVE a lithified sand dune for pete's sake. Every sand dune on the face of this earth is NOT lithified. What you are seeing in the rocks is the grains of sand that form sand dunes all collected in one place which causes them to lie the way they do in dunes because of how the grains got shaped, but there is no such thing as a LITHIFIED SAND DUNE. It is an impossibility. The only lithified beach you could possibly see is one that was rapidly filled in by new sediments to preserve its form. There is no such thing as a lithified beach on the surface of the earth. The footprints are of course footprints, rapidly filled in and preserved between tides during the Flood.

MHz #fundie givemegossip.com

That is why there was a book left. The dividing line for a child of light and a child in darkness is found in the prophecies about the last tribulation that men ever face. The threat of death ceases to hold any power when immortality of body and soul is the norm

Nasty as in 'top'?
Think of this as His version of a double tap. The flood took 99,999% of the Giants and the exodus wars finished the job.

If North America was ever offered an opportunity to back away from the world stage and tend to it's own 'wounded place' the EU and Mid-East will still have to settle the issue of 'reality' meets 'myth' as God's possession om this earth is Jerusalem rather than anything NA can offer. I would think a naval blockade would be all that is needed as full occupation would not be able to follow any certain timeline. The Media can broadcast anything they want as to what horrible fate we are facing when adapting to a continent that is fire and ice means grow food in a different area and only for NA and plan on snow skiing to become popular in the east and a trip to the beach in the west means you take your own water maker

Jer:25:15-18:
For thus saith the LORD God of Israel unto me;
Take the wine cup of this fury at my hand,
and cause all the nat
ions,
to whom I send thee,
to drink it.
And they shall drink,
and be moved,
and be mad,
because of the sword that I will send among them.
Then took I the cup at the LORD's hand,
and made all the nations to drink,
unto whom the LORD had sent me:
To wit,
Jerusalem,
and the cities of Judah,
and the kings thereof,
and the princes thereof,
to make them a desolation,
an astonishment,
an hissing,
and a curse;
as it is this day;

Jer:25:26-29:
And all the kings of the north,
far and near,
one with another,
and all the kingdoms of the world,
which are upon the face of the earth:
and the king of Sheshach shall drink after them.
Therefore thou shalt say unto them,
Thus saith the LORD of hosts,
the God of Israel;
Drink ye, and be drunken,
and spue,
and fall,
and rise no more,
because of the sword which I will send among you.
And it shall be,
if they refuse to take the cup at thine hand to drink,
then shalt thou say unto them,
Thus saith the LORD of hosts;
Ye shall certainly drink.
For,
lo,
I begin to bring evil on the city which is called by my name,
and should ye be utterly unpunished?
Ye shall not be unpunished:
for I will call for a sword upon all the inhabitants of the earth,
saith the LORD of hosts.

Robert Taylor #fundie reactionaryliberty.com

[Post "Introduction to 'Reactionary Liberty: The Libertarian Counter-Revolution'"]

For libertarians like myself, Dr. Ron Paul’s 2008 and 2012 presidential runs were an absolute revelation. During the debates and in his media appearances, we saw a humble and decent man tirelessly seek out the Remnant of liberty in our dark age of perpetual war and unlimited state power. With uncompromising courage, Paul introduced millions of people to libertarianism.

Witnessing Paul openly denounce the Iraq War, central banking, and the entire premise of global empire launched my own personal philosophical journey. The works of Frederic Bastiat, Henry Hazlitt, and Friedrich Hayek began overflowing my bookshelves. And when I eventually began reading as much Murray Rothbard as I possibly could, I was hooked.

[...]

Up until the end of Paul’s last presidential run and his retirement from public office in 2014, libertarianism fell on the Right side of the political spectrum by default. Its biggest proponents and advocates rarely spoke too loudly on cultural issues, but whenever they did, they were unmistakably un-Leftist.

Fast forward just two years after Paul retired, and the libertarian movement is now a shell of what it used to be. Its major party candidate in 2016, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, exemplifies this direction that libertarianism has taken ever since. Johnson, who displayed little intellectual curiosity and even rejected the key tenets of libertarianism (the non-aggression principle and free association), never missed a chance to advertise his politically correct, Leftist positions on marijuana, gay marriage, and abortion. Johnson even bragged that he is politically quite similar to fellow 2016 presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, a not too subtle attempt to appeal to young liberals.

What in the world happened? How did libertarianism evolve from a highly disciplined and radical study of economics, rights, and the use of force in society (that also understood the necessity and desirability of hierarchy and tradition), into the milquetoast branding of “low-tax liberalism” and “fiscally conservative and socially liberal?”

[...]

This book, then, is dedicated to what I call reactionary liberty: the defense of radical libertarianism and an unapologetic cultural traditionalism that rejects, root and branch, both state power and cultural Marxism. While libertarianism as a political philosophy concerns itself only with the question of political force, I argue that the libertarian ethic of non-aggression and private property necessitates a rejection of egalitarianism, multiculturalism, and diversity. “Private property capitalism and egalitarian multiculturalism are as unlikely a combination as socialism and cultural conservatism...libertarians must be radical and uncompromising conservatives,” argues Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

Without this reactionary element, libertarianism can never be a serious movement because it will always fall victim to John O’Sullivan’s Law: that any movement, entity, or institution that is not explicitly right-wing will eventually turn left-wing. While libertarians may believe that they are “above” or “beyond” Left and Right, the Leftist infiltration of libertarianism (combined with the evolutionary psychology of r/K selection theory) proves that libertarians cannot be neutral.

Thus, the reactionary libertarian prefers the conservative Edmund Burke to the revolutionary Jacobins of the French Revolution. “Burke argued for the traditional liberties of the English against the ‘abstract’ Rights of Man advocated by the revolutionaries, predicting correctly that such abstract rights, with no force of custom behind them, would perish in a reign of terror,” notes Joseph Sobran. “The revolutionaries, he said, were so obsessed with man’s rights that they had forgotten man’s nature.”

[...]

For the reactionary libertarian, this requires an uncompromising opposition to this cultural Marxism—a counter-revolution against the perpetual revolution of Leftism. Individuals are different from another, and not equal; we live in an unavoidably tribal world; men and are not women and women are not men; freedom is both a responsibility and a right; democracy must be de-legitimized, but if we are to live in a democratic society, then the franchise should be severely limited. These insights into the human condition—including a complete rejection of egalitarianism—form the foundation for a consistent, coherent, and forceful philosophy of liberty.

[...]

The Italian traditionalist Julius Evola wore the term “reactionary” on his sleeve proudly, calling it “the true test of courage.” With this book, I look to blend this Evolian courage with a radical libertarianism to forge a coherent and forceful philosophy of liberty—reactionary means for libertarian ends.

SpearChuckinJungleBunny #racist niggermania.net

I think similar thoughts all the time. There doesn't have to be niggers around for me to think about how very different things would be if there were some around. My contempt for niggers makes me appreciate moments like the one you had all the more. We humans are fantastic beings.

The reason is that the nigger species, evolving strictly within the limited climes of hot Africa, had no need for empathy. They breed like rats, murder one another over a half-eaten banana or just for fun, and generally have an environment that is high energy and chock full of various life forms....it's essentially a high temperature, high energy, life-dense environment where competition is fierce not only across species but within the species. This is why they are so quick to violence- because death is commonplace in the animal kingdom, and murdering your genetic competition benefits them under such scenarios. The high murder and death rates are also why they hit puberty early and have a shitload of niglets before dying at around age 25. But I digress.

For humans who braved outward into the many other continents, facing completely different, much more severe weather and resource limitations, first of all a bigger BRAIN was needed. These were conditions where brain power was needed, and furthermore where the tribes needed to come together and act in their collective interest. This means less infighting, less quick to anger, more cooperation, more obedience to a competent authority, and more empathy. These traits didn't pop up right away, but over many generation they were the traits that were selected for by nature and by humans making breeding choices.

Thus...the further you are from the equator, the smarter you are and the less hot-blooded you tend to be. This holds across all the races, all geographies. The colder the region is, the fewer animals and plants you will find that can be eaten, the more thinking ahead is required to survive winters, to plant crops and cultivate what can be saved over the coldest months. It simply makes sense. This is why Whites and Asians are so much more cooperative with one another, so naturally helpful, altruistic, empathetic and at times selfless and heroic.

On the other side of that coin, this is why niggers are so cruel, indifferent to the suffering of others, selfish, dumb, uncreative, thoughtless, severely lacking in self-awareness, and cowardly. Evolutionary-wise, they have no need for such things. The jungles, steppe and deserts of their homeland which they never left provide them with plenty of game, plenty of fruit, and no need to ever worry about long winters, building shelters against extreme cold and precipitation. The nigger species has evolved to its current state by being savage, breeding out of control to make up for their inter-tribal hair-trigger violent tendencies (just LOOK at the permanent expression of anger on any African's monkey face), and being completely shameless about their savageness. They have NO shame, no remorse, and you will never see such expressions on the faces of nigger mugshots after said ape just murdered or raped a human.

For that reason above all others, I wish so badly for a disease one hundred times worse than Ebola and AIDS combined to appear that selectively attacks niggers and reduces their population to zero. The world will be infinitely better off.

Blood of Tyrants #fundie freerepublic.com

Darwin gave atheists the “beginning” they needed to rid themselves of God. Darwin also was wise enough to realize that if a cell were more complex that simple protoplasm his theory would never hold up. As it turns out, a single cell is so incredibly complex that scientists have only a remote understanding of its inner workings. Believing that a human being could accidentally evolve from muck and ooze is as ridiculous as believing that a watch you find on the beach is the result of gravity, chemical reactions with salt water and erosion.

Pat Robertson #fundie rawstory.com

Televangelist Pat Robertson on Monday explained to his viewers that “sophisticated” Americans received less miracles because they had learned “things that says God isn’t real” like evolution.

On Monday’s episode of CBN’s The 700 Club, Robertson responded to a viewer who wanted to know why “amazing miracles (people raised from the dead, blind eyes open, lame people walking) happen with great frequency in places like Africa, and not here in the USA?”

“People overseas didn’t go to Ivy League schools,” the TV preacher laughed. “We’re so sophisticated, we think we’ve got everything figured out. We know about evolution, we know about Darwin, we know about all these things that says God isn’t real.”

“We have been inundated with skepticism and secularism,” he continued. “And overseas, they’re simple, humble. You tell ‘em God loves ‘em and they say, ‘Okay, he loves me.’ You say God will do miracles and they say, ‘Okay, we believe him.’”

Ray Marion #fundie books.google.com

Hi Mich, I'll start from the beginning. In 1987 I was an atheist. In my bedroom on top of the store, I was laying face down on mv bed and I hit my butt cheeks spread, I turned my head and realized an evil invisible being did this, I was terrorfied, I didn't know what to do, I prayed, "If there's a God, help me". Next, I saw my soul coming out of the left side of my body. My soul was standing at the end of the bed and I saw my body on the bed, next, I was in God's presence for about 5 minutes, no words exchanged, eyes closed, I jumped off the bed and put my hands to the side of my face and said "Holy shit, there's a God", and 1 was very scared. Two days later, face down on my bed, all of a sudden, the room lights up superbrightly, two angels in my bedroom fighting, my eyes are closed but I knew they were fighting, super pressure on the top of my body, I felt them trying to enter my body, I was shacking, next, I'm jabbed on the right side of my chest, and they entered my body. That week, I see Dr. Scott for the first time on satellite, the first thing he said was, It dates Jesus' birth on September 29th 2 B.C, it's history written in advance. The first Sunday I listen to him, he leaches on Jude 1:9 and days Michael and Satan are fighting over Moses" body. This is how I knew that il was Michael and Satan in my body. I only told my girlfriend Alison Boily that Michael and Satan were in my bedroom, I didn't tell her thev were in my body, I didn't want anyone to know. Il was not until 2016 that I would reveal that they were in my body. The following is proof that they are in my body. In 1989,1 was with Ed Mckenna at the sandpit in Beausejour, Manitoba, he was five feet in front of me on the sand, I stopped walking behind him and pointed to the water and said, "It's a lake of fire". It was Michael that said this. I was stunned by what I said, I was terrorfied for about 2 hours and Ed mocked for about 2 hours. Enoch prophesied that a body of water would be changed to fire and it would be God's final judgment. Ezekiel prophesied that the devil would be taken to earth against his will to the sides of the pit the future lake of fire. When Michael said, "It's a lake of fire", Satan was in my body and was besides the pit as prophesied by Ezekiel. Mich, I'm a real prophet, I don't know if you and Jozette and your children are chosen, I know I'm chosen. I warn you, blasphemy against the saintly spirit won't be forgiven, I told you my story, don't doubt what I told you.

How did I break up with Alison? She was naked on my couch, I had my right big toe in her beaver and was wiggling it and watching Dr. Scott on satellite, she said, "Stop listening to Dr. Scott and marry me". I got up, told her to get dressed, and 1 kicked her out of my apartment and we broke up.

You can do a web search " Jesus born September'. This will show you good essays on the course of Abia, To date Jesus' birth, Zacharias was John's father of the course of Abia which can be dated. Elizabeth's pregnancy, then, the Bible say s Jesus and John were born six months apart which put Jesus' birth in the fall. I agree with Dr. Scott that Jesus was born on the feast of the trumpets.

If I said I wasn't the smartest person on the earth I would be lying because Michael is in my body and he is super super super super smart.

There are prophecies about me I won't mention, I will let them happen, There's one big prophecy yet to come. I'll mention my birth mark. Taurus the bull was the sign given to the birthright man Joseph. Dr. Scott was right to leach that the two horns of power of the bull is Mannasseh the United States and Ephraim the British Empire. The scored lines in the pyramid of Isaiah 19:19 hits my birthmark the star called Alceon. Dr. Scott was right that the bull shall be Jesus returning to the earth as the charging bull killing his enemies at Armageddon. He also taught that the bull is painted over the Rheem in Job. He said the Rheem was twice the size of an ox and could't b tamed by man, and if it caught sight of a man, it would charge to kill. It was killed off by man because it was too dangerous to let live. When I come back in about 200 years as Moses again, I won't have this birthmark and I will have a different body because I will be born of a different woman.

To be a lord, you have to own at least one slave as property to boss around. Eve was cursed in the Greek text with pain associated with child-bearing and Adam becomes her lord. These curses were put on Jesus at calvary. Your wife is you Goddess, and you are a God, and hopefully you is a son of Jesus and of his father, Jesus came in his father's name, his father's name is Jesus. When Jesus returns his name shall be "The lord is there".
Only Elias and Moses appear more than once on the earth, Elias 8 times and I Moses 7 times.

If looks like Nostradamus' prophecy of a tax revolt in the west is getting closer.

Written by; Ray Marion (Moses in Jude 1:9 possessed by Michael and Satan since 1987 )

Megan Fox #fundie rawstory.com

In the video embedded below, fundamentalist Christian home-school mom and conservative cultural critic Megan Fox — no relation to “Transformers” actress Megan Fox — visits the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago and purports to “audit” the museum for its “liberal bias.”

[...]

In the video’s opening moments, Fox is reading a display regarding the evolution of eukaryotes — which she has to ask her camera operator how to pronounce — simple, microscopic animals that first evolved as single-cell life forms, but which became multicellular, beginning the diversification that would lead to complex life forms.

“‘At first, many eukaryotes were single-celled, and many still are today,’” Fox reads from the display before scoffing. “What? If many still are today, then that would support the theory that they have never changed, that they have always been as they are today, not that they started someplace else and then are here, but they were always this and still are today.”

Regarding what paleontologists have said about the first animals to make the transition from life in the water to life on land, Fox says this is impossible. God made the creatures of the water to live in the water and the creatures of the land to live in the land, which is why fish have fins and people have feet.

“It’s not like their fins fell off and they grew feet,” she says. “That’s what they want you to believe, that their fins fell off and then they grew some feet and started walking on the land. This is the dumbest theory I’ve ever heard in my whole life. It’s not good, it’s really not good. It’s bad. It’s very bad. Do you know how complex feet are?”

At one point, Fox argues levelly into the camera that evidence of the existence of dragons exists, but that liberals and scientists are covering it up because “it would throw off their whole time line of what they want you to believe.”

JesusChristRep #fundie blizzforums.com

so if what you are saying is that the first life organisms did not require oxygen at the time but later evolved to incorperate oxygen, then how could evoultuon at the cellular level have occured keeping the organism alive? what i am trying to say is...during evolution the organism would die during the information change in cells as they switch 'jobs'

Valcouria #fundie forum.nationstates.net

The only warping of Christianity that is occurring are the secular humanists who have infiltrated good Christian society and started preaching that everything is just fine, there's no such thing as sin. To be frank, those who ascribe to such a view are not Christian, just some offshoot of the secular humanist viewpoint that happens to believe in something greater than themselves.
...
Should be called something else, to be honest.

*America's government and laws are not based on Christianity nor is marriage a necessarily religious ceremony.*


Just about all laws are based on Christianity, actually. The Ten Commandments? Those things that some courts have said are not fit to hang in a court room to display our humble legal beginnings?

As for the second point, the church and the government should be in step with each other; it shows that they are both in the same mindset. When one goes a different way, society stumbles and falls apart...as ancient Rome will show.

CTDeLude #fundie chud.com

Many of this can sound far fetched to our society but that is because we have been built up to deny the supernatural. Its a hoax or an elaborate trick we say. And that is why demonic activity is so much more below the radar in developed countries. Go on a mission trip to some third world country and prepare to get an education about how obvious the works of demons are in countries that are open to superstition and such much more then we.

kittykins-pi #conspiracy #crackpot deviantart.com

This is silly. The so-called "gas chambers" were delousing showers. Lice are known to carry typhoid fever, which is a huge problem in war and was a huge problem during the Second World War. This is why they had the prisoners remove their clothes and why they had their hair cut. After all, why would the Nazis bother doing that if they were just going to kill and bury/cremate them anyway?

And here's the kicker: If Auschwitz was really a "death camp", then why did the Nazis bother moving Anne Frank and her sister to Bergen-Belsen, which was one of the normal concentration camps according to holocaust lore and where they died of typhus?

Always hear everyone's position, no matter how "evil" you may believe them to be. And don't get emotional, either. Be logical and reasonable in all things. Do not mock them or scoff at even ridiculous claims, for truth is stranger than fiction, and it is always possible that you are wrong.

Unnamed men #fundie telegraph.co.uk

A waitress in a cafe in central Nice has filed a police complaint after she was allegedly assaulted by two men because she refused to “stop serving alcohol” on the first day of the holy month of Ramadan.

The alleged beating in the French Riviera town historically famed for its sun, palm-fringed beach front and quality of life, has prompted a heated political debate over whether the country is increasingly becoming prey to “religious fundamentalism and ghettoised communities”.

The issue has become increasingly fraught less than a year before presidential elections and just six months after Islamist attacks in Paris killed 130.

The incident took place less than a week before football fans descend on the sun-kissed town for Sunday’s Euro 2016 football match between Poland and Northern Ireland.

The waitress, a French 30-year-old of Tunisian origin, said she was serving drinks at Monday lunch on the terrace of the Vitis Café on Nice’s rue Lamartine, near the rue d’Anglais, when two men started haranguing her, insulting the young woman because she was serving alcoholic beverages to customers.

“I was all alone in the bar when two passers-by suddenly appeared. They pointed to the bottles of alcohol behind the bar, then one of them told me in Arabic: ‘You should be ashamed of yourself serving alcohol in the Ramadan period.’

Ramadan traditionally begins the morning after the sighting of the crescent moon. Marking the divine revelation received by Prophet Mohammed, the month sees Muslim faithful abstain from eating, drinking, smoking and having sex from dawn to dusk.

They break the fast with a meal known as iftar and before dawn have a second opportunity to eat and drink during suhur. The month is followed by the Eid al-Fitr festival.

The waitress said one of the two men then shouted: “If I was God, I would have hung you.”

Unfazed by his threatening behaviour, the waitress shot back: “You’re not God to judge me.”

The men launched into a tirade, calling her a “dirty whore” and left the cafe in a hurry. A few seconds later, however, the venue's CCTV footage reportedly shows the two men turn round abruptly and one of them rush towards her and violently slap the waitress in the face, knocking her to the floor.

“The whole scene was recorded by the security cameras that I transferred to the police,” said the bar’s owner, Nacim.

In shock, the waitress didn’t phone the police straight away and instead contacted the owner.

He persuaded her to file a legal complaint for “voluntary violence”. The two men have reportedly been identified. One of them is known to be an illegal migrant who is a notoriously threatening figure in the district, but both are currently at large.

KiraJenLove #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Beaches and mountains are the indirect result of the Flood, which was created by God. There were no oceans prior to the Flood. Most of the Floodwater is out in the oceans.
Before the Flood, there were vast subterranean water chambers that existed under the thinner plates of the Earth's crust. During the Flood, these "fountains of the deep" broke open, and this water came to the surface, collapsing the chambers as they emptied, and creating the ocean basins. The rest of the water came from the collapse of the 7th layer of water/ice above the Earth. These two things combined caused everything on the Earth to be buried 2 miles deep in water. The weight of all this water on the Earth's crust caused the plates to shift and collide with each other and mountain ranges were built. As the thicker plates rose up, and the thinner plates sank, water drained rapidly off the surface, creating formations like the Grand Canyon, which used to be soft sediment at that time, and later mineralized into rock.
Beaches are created by these Flood-created oceans washing sediment against the edge of a land mass.

So, although mountains and beaches were not necessarily part of the original creation, they are definitely post-Flood creations.

Billie Faye Woodward #crackpot #ufo zorraofhollowearth.com

<part of a Hollow Earth meditation session>
Zorra:

Well, what I’m going to say is this is a special time. This is a special time for you, all of you, globally. We are going to what is termed enable you to do what is termed as make connection with your Godselves. And that is what this meditation is about. And it is also about bringing forth your blessing that you have been waiting for. So, my beloved Saraiya is standing by and she has it all planned out, the meditation.
And so – we only have 20 minutes – so I am going to be silent myself and I am going to bring forth my beloved Saraiya, and she shall take it from this point. So, it is about meditating. So prepare yourselves. Turn off your iPads and iPods and things that are going to distract you. And turn off your telephones and go into your altar room or into your private space or your way out in Mother Nature and out with trees. And just get away from your hustle and bustle of your everyday existence. All right? Let us begin. And here is my beloved Saryya.

Saraiya:
Indeed. Beloved children of Terra. We welcome all of you today to partake of this great event of this global meditation. So to begin everyone of you, just begin to relax. Whether you're sitting in a chair, whether you are out in nature whether you're in the woods or on the beach, or you are by a tree. Just sit and begin to relax with your feet on the ground, preferably on grass or on the sand or on the ground, but preferably with your feet connected to our beloved Terra and being barefoot if possible.
[...]
Zorra: In actuality do what is termed as stay where you are in your meditation, even after this 20 minutes is over. Just stay where you are and soak in the love and the Gods and Goddesses that you are.
Just feel that energy welling up within you as you walk on the white sandy beaches of Hollow Earth. As you step into the Hollow Earth warm waters and you commune with the mer peoples and things of this nature, and you see the oneness of them and the oneness of Hollow Earth. And the oneness of the power that lies within you. It is there. It is waiting to be tapped into.
So just do that.
Stay in your meditating state even after this meditation has come to an end. Let it not end, but continue within you. Stay as long as you desire, walking on the sands of Hollow Earth. Hand-in-hand with your Godselves. With your friends and with your relatives and with your brothers and sisters of Hollow Earth. Just walk with them and feel the Goddesses and Gods that you are. Because you truly are Gods and Goddesses. And therefore abundance is yours and you can bring this forth yourselves.

Whale.to #conspiracy whale.to

[EW 2009 Jan] Scientists Behind the Learning Curve re: Dolphins ;-) during a feeding session a female dolphin swam faster and faster around the pool and then leaped out of the water toward Gentry's outstretched hand, which held a fish. Instead of grabbing the fish, the dolphin took his hand in her teeth for a moment and looked into his eyes. Gentry said the surroundings disappeared in that moment, which stretched into an extended vision of the then-probable future of our world--full of destruction and death. When she let go, the vision abruptly ended and she resumed swimming around the pool. He immediately left the facility and didn't return.

[EW Feb 2008] Film of Dolphins Manipulating Gravity

[EW 24 Oct 2006] Lines of Force Around Our Flying Dolphin....---Don Croft The dolphin was photographed near Santa Monica, California, a few hours after Rick Moors put the first large orgonite device in the Pacific Ocean there in January, 2002. A thousand or so bottlenose dolphins showed up at the site, which so astonished the photographer that he shot a couple rolls of film of the event from his balcony, next to the beach. When he developed the film, none of the dolphins in the water were in the photographs and only this one was seen, lazily 'swimming' from left to right, about fifty feet above the water in several frames. The photographer hadn't noticed the flying dolphin, by the way, so was doubly astonished when it showed up in the photos, later
image
[EW Aug 2006] Whales Attracted to Dolphin Ball

[EW June 2006] May 2005 Trip to Hawaii - Carol Croft

[EW May 2006] Dolphin hyperdimensional physics displays...--Don Croft
The dolphin began swimming very fast around the tank, then swam suddenly toward Gentry, came out of the water and held his hand in her teeth while looking into his eyes. He was overwhelmed with a dark future vision in that instant and was suspended in time while a vision of the self-destruction of humanity played out. Then she let go, dropped back into the water and swam away from him.

[feb 2005] The Sacred Geometry of Cetaceans ----
Stevo's whale friend said yes, that's the goal. In his words: "They, the Illuminati, have always feared the humans linking with the cetaceans like this in etheric battle; they knew it would be their undoing. This is why our navy has been genociding whales and dolphins for years."

hisarcher19 #fundie hisarcher19.deviantart.com

As the title implies, I'm going to look at the "gay-rights" arguments that really scrape the bottom of the barrel. I hope that whatever side of the debate your on, you can agree that these arguments don't hold water. To emphasize this, I'm going to try to sound as neutral as possible.

1. Separation of Church and State is in the Constitution. So you can't use Christian morality to outlaw same-sex marriage.

This argument stems from a misunderstanding of what Separation of Church and State is. The phrase appears nowhere in the Constitution. It was in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to a church that was worried Jefferson would force his Deism on the churches. Jefferson assured them the first amendment would protect their freedom. So the question is, what does the first amendment do? It prevents the government from establishing a state religion. Outlawing same-sex marriage does not establish a religion. It doesn't force anyone to become a Christian anymore than it forces them to be Jewish, Muslim, Mormon or any other faith that sees homosexuality as sin. Also, it doesn't prevent anyone from using their religion to motivate their politics. If you truly believe your religion, it should influence your decisions or you should consider if you truly believe it or not. You want real Separation of Church and State? How about having the government butt out of marriage entirely since it finds its origin in religion and different religions have different views of marriage anyway (e.g. Islam and some forms of Mormonism permit polygamy.)

2. The way things are, the LGBT community are 2nd class citizens.

No they aren't. They have the same rights everyone else does. Including marriage. To elaborate, a homosexual can marry someone of the opposite sex, but not someone of the same sex. And a heterosexual can marry someone of the opposite sex, but not the same sex. We have equal rights. The LGBT goal would make more sense if they asked for a new right since the equality they ask for already exist.

3. It's unconstitutional to out-law same-sex marriage since marriage is a right.

Marriage is not a right, it's a privilege. If you read the Constitution you'd know that. And again, my previous points stand.

4. Homosexuality is accepted by the majority as normal and thus, no longer immoral.

First off, I doubt the claim at the majority support it since most states ban same-sex marriage and (as of this writing) only 17 states allow it. Last I checked, 17 out of 50 was not a majority. Second, even if that was true, to say that the population decides right and wrong is insane at best and dangerous at worst. There was a time when slavery was considered acceptable by many. Years before even that it was common for people to rape the women of the country they conquered. Was any of this right? (Rhetorical question. If you answer "yes", please see a therapist.) To quote Leo Tolstoy:
Wrong doesn't cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.-Leo Tolstoy
5. People are born homosexual, so it would be wrong to not allow them what they want.

Some scientists speculate the same thing about alcoholics, drug-addicts and sociopaths. Does that make what they do right? (Again, a rhetorical question.) If this were true, these conditions would be more like diseases. But as someone I know (who was an alcoholic) put it, what he did wasn't totally involuntary. He chose to get drunk just as he chose to stop and ultimately kick alcoholic beverages out of his life all together. Just as people have left the LGBT lifestyle.

6. What about infertile couples? They can't have children either and your Bible says marriage is for having babies.

This argument is a reply to oft-quoted argument against same-sex marriage by pointing out that same-sex couples can't naturally produce a child. There counterpoint, however, is a strawman. This may shock some people, but the Bible says sex (in wedlock) was not only for child rearing but for pleasure. It was designed to be a beautiful experience... then humanity ruined it like everything else. Proof? Song of Songs. :iconnuffsaidplz: Besides, homosexual behavior causes serious health problem. HIV being only a tip of the ice-berg. An infertile couple is still natural and, as long as they are being responsible and faithful, they won't contract STDs.

7. People used religion (i.e. Christianity) to justify not letting interracial couples marriage.

Those people were also stupid. The Bible is shown to be very anti-racist, including having interracial couples (like Ruth and Boaz.) And another thing, PLEASE stop equating what you do to the way other people look. It's nonsensical at best and insensitive at worst.
For more info, click here: townhall.com/columnists/michae…
8. If you don't support the LGBT, you're homophobic!

You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.- Inigo Montoya, "The Princess Bride."
Furthermore, if someone was in a lifestyle that was harmful wouldn't you try to convince them out of it? We do this with alcoholics, why not homosexuals? Especially since homosexual behavior brings damage that makes alcoholic damage look miniscule. Frankly, I could argue I love and care for them more than those who try to push for this behavior.

9. Legalizing gay marriage won't affect anyone.

I think the redefinition of mankind's oldest and most important institution would affect everyone. Also, some LGBT advocates agree it is to affect everyone as to make people stop viewing homosexuality negatively. Now I know some of you are saying, "Not THAT kind of effect." Sinful acts never just affect one or two people, it often affects whole communities and even countries. Achan's sin in Joshua 7, and David's sin in 2 Samuel 24 are a couple good examples. As for some modern examples, Spain and Argentina have greatly deteriorated the family structure ever since same-sex marriage was allowed. In the Netherlands, there is a decline in marriage rates even though same-sex marriage is allowed. To help explain my point (on this topic and others), I recommend the book "Homosexuality ad the Truth of Politics." Now before you shoot this down as biased, there are LGBT advocates that agree with this book. In fact, the leader of H.O.P.E. (Homosexuals Oppose Pride Extremism) wishes that this book was required reading in schools!

Also, this journal explains the problems of same-sex parenting.


Any thoughts? Do you agree? If not, why? Did I miss any? Leave your thoughts in the comments and please act like an adult.

Vaginal Jesus #racist darklyrics.com

14. Happy Hanukaust

Your uncle is a bar of soap
Your cousin is a lampshade
Your best friend is a candle
And you're a fucking Jew

Your neighbors are a landfill, too bad you got away
But all the Jews that didn't have rotted in the lime pits

50 years later,
You've still got an agenda,
For world domination,
But you'd better think again
To when we had the upper hand,
Der Fuhrer had control,
You kikes were in the cattle cars,
Then shoved into an oven...

Think of all the friends and family you've lost...
Happy Hanukaust!

You claim six million, I wish it were true
But you're a pack of lying fucking Jews
A holocaust memorial built on the land
Where most of your relatives are buried in sand

In bulldozed graves to cover the pollution
Too bad you weren't a part of the final solution
Wearing long sleeves to cover your tattoo
Will never hide the fact that you're a dirty Jew

Think of all the friends and family you've lost...
Happy Hanukaust!

Light the menorah and think of the time
When you sold out your neighbors for a handful of dimes
All those filthy Jews... They must have been pissed
They couldn't buy their way onto Schindler's list

Think of all the friends and family you've lost...
Happy Hanukaust!

David J. Stewart #fundie #sexist #homophobia jesusisprecious.org

God Curse America!

I am serious, I often pray for God to damn this rotten baby-murdering, queer-loving, counterfeit-Bible promoting, funny money printing, perverse, God-provoking cesspool of iniquity in America! If you don't feel the same, it is only because you are in tune with this ungodly evil world (James 4:4). When I visited Hawaii back in 2007, I went to hear some live Hawaiian steel guitar. It was so beautiful. I was privileged to hear Hawaii's most beautiful singer, Aunty Genoa Keawe, who died a year later at age 87. Very sadly though, she was a lifelong Mormon and almost assuredly is now burning in Hell forever. Mormonism is a satanic false religion rooted in sexual perversion! Granted, most members of the Mormon cult are not perverts, but they are taught a damnable false plan of salvation of works plus faith in a false Christ. Mormons deny Jesus' deity. They believe that all men have the potential to become as gods (just like the serpent told Eve), and they see Jesus Christ merely as the prototype. Research online about Mormonism's bizarre Masonic rituals, beds in their Mormon temples, water baptism for THE DEAD, and magic underwear. These are truly some sick-minded people, which Evangelist Ravi Zachariah sinfully hobnobs with.

Anyway, at the end of the music event about 25 guests gathered around to sing the song, “God Bless America!” I was the only person not singing, I am not sorry to admit that I just cannot sing that song amidst legalized child murder (abortion) since 1973, legalized homosexuality, and legalized pedophile-promoting TV shows like Dance Moms! Why should God bless a wicked nation of ingrates? Those child abusing ungodly reprobates on Dance Moms should be in prison! I am so sick of this hypocritical ungodly culture of perverseness that sees no harm, even promotes little girls and women walking around over 95% naked in public (and in some cases are completely nude on adult beaches in Florida and other places), and our nation's legislatures are okay with that! Judges are often as worthless as the corrupt system that empowers them! Our moral judgment is rotten in America!!! How can queer judges make sound judgments? I won't go as far as to say that scantily clothed women “get what they deserve” when they get raped, but they do get what they tempted a man to do! Literally, they asked for it! Sadly, oftentimes it will be some other innocent women or girl who is attacked because of their wickedness and careless attire. Judgment day is coming America! God will not be mocked! I am just a sinner with a voice in cyberspace, but neither you nor me can escape the omniscient (all knowing) judgment of God almighty (Hebrews 9:27; Ecclesiastes 12:14)!!!!!!!

In5D #crackpot #magick #mammon in5d.net

QUANTUM ENERGY IN5D TIE DYED SHIRTS!!
Materials: 100% Cotton Ladies fitted shirt, Procion Reactive Dye infused with 99.9% Siesta Key Quartz Crystal Sand, LOVE & POSITIVE ENERGY, prewashed with Synthrapol and soaked for 30 minutes in Soda Ash before dying. Shirts are rewashed in synthrapol after dying. In this process, I add a white t shirt to the wash to ensure there is no dye leftover on these shirts. As always, wash with like colors.

Spiritualist Rosie Neal says:

“I personally think you just stumbled on a very Sacred Gift for anyone that wants to receive the energies. The shirt you wore to my home last Friday emitted a very Powerful frequency. It was your own Signature Resonance Frequency. This takes it all to another level because of your level of Awareness, Heart based Expansion. Adding Crystals just is a game changer & it opens a entire new paradigm. This allows for absorption of a higher level of Conscious Expression. “Game Changer” on the Quantum level.”

We now ship all over the world!

All sales are final. Double check your size!

Koolz #conspiracy realjewnews.com

See this Blue Ball in Space, this speck in nothingness for miles and miles, from the Sun it cannot even be seen.

Yes here on this Place of Spirit, Earth, Wind, and Fire. People claim a land is more holy then any other land.

Sand and Rocks are Holy here compared to there. The World has Dragon Lines that flow in it’s rocks and sand, they alone boost energy and consciousness. This is what all the ancient sites are built on.

There is no place on this planet more sacred then any other! It’s Sentient Earth, it doesn’t hold one part of it’s self more sacred then any other place.

The thinking that this area is more sacred then that area is the psychology that creates war, creates violence. It’s same Mind Warp that makes millions of Sheep Worship Cube of Saturn called Mecca(the Black Stone)

Israel will be the Demon that shall ever trouble Trump, whispering in his ear to do this and that. Using Religion to sway him to there means.

Satan the sly Serpent…

Not Perfect, But Forgiven #fundie rr-bb.com

(Describing the post Armageddon world)

I believe the Lord will begin to restore the planet to its pre-flood climate, restoring the firmament above the earth (water canopy) and the year round sub-tropical environment descriptive of Eden. Due to the water canopy's innate ability to block UV rays, and therefore drastically decrease cellular degeneration, people will age VERY slowly. (Or perhaps prolonged life is the direct result of proximity to Christ who is God). Those who look like young children may actually be 40 or so years old. Those who look like adults may actually be alot closer to 200 years old or so. It will be a very curious time we are not accustomed to.

WeadMancer & h3rting #sexist reddit.com

(NOTE: They really believe this is how world works. I think I'm done.)

(WeadMancer)
Exactly, the only reason femshits spout on about masculinity is bad is to filter out all the blue-pilled numale cuck lords who are dumb enough to actually listen to a female, and make it easier to find the Chads who's testosterone physically makes it impossible for them to take a woman seriously.
As usual, females say something, and do the exact, polar opposite. In other news, water is still wet and can someone please end my pathetic existence.

(h3rting)
Fantastically put. I've got a Chad friend who has a harem of women, probably 5 at this point, all of which he says claim to be feminists. Last week he sent me a video of one of these girls (PHD student) pissing in a cup and pouring it on herself in the shower with his name written on her tits in lipstick. I kid you fucking not. He laughs about how when he's with them, the feminist garbage goes straight out the window, he doesn't hear a single word of it. Then when she's left his house, covered in piss and cum, she takes to social media to share the latest buzzfeed feminism beta male-hit piece. Come to think of it this guy needs to come here and share his stories, they're almost unbelievable

Anti Spore #fundie antispore.com

[About the recently released video game Spore, which allows players to create and nurture an evolving species.]

I used to like Will Wright. He created Sim City, a fantastic game that celebrated the earth that God created for us and allowed you to use all your God given abilities to make an ideal society. But if you ever felt like you had too much power, God would come in with a tornado or an earthquake and put you back in place.

You would think that as a member of the Episcopal Church, a smart man like Will Wright would not be capable of creating Spore. However, we must be reminded that the Episcopal Church is the only church in america that ordains homosexuals on a regular basis.

It makes sense that a perverted church would cause a man to make the creations he has in this game. It just may be that evolution is not the only thing to fear this game teaching your children.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

This is an important lesson for parents. God often doesn't answer our prayers right away to test us, humble us, chastise us, and teach us. God didn't just give food and water to the Jews. God waited until they were thirsty to the point of dehydration. God withheld food until they felt that they were starving. God tested them, to see how they'd react when the going got tough. Instead of trusting and thanking God, they complained and rebelled. They failed the tests God gave them. So God had to chastise them repeatedly. This is exactly the way God operates still today. People get angry and rebel against God because God makes them wait, forces them to trust Him, and doesn't spoil them. There is much to be learned from all this as parents.

lastprophet #conspiracy forum.davidicke.com

Doomed Wonder Team: Plane Ran Out of Fuel Before Crash: DOUBLE joke
The general joke by fake plane crashes, the debris: this time it's survivors with half of the plane vaporized.
As for specific jokes: the peak from all lines added daily in the aftermath of the release of the script "Brazilian Football Wonder Team DROPPED": is "Ran Out of Fuel".

What the DOUBLE joke is about
It goes beyond mocking human cattle about to be stripped of air travel before even wondering about the "low cost flights" psy-op.
It's also self-"mockery": same day oil prices jump 8%.
In other words: illuminati forced to admit that they are starting to run out of ammo (read: oil) to continue defending the most expensive psy-op ever: oil price below production costs.

Talk of "sports champions" casted in duo-pack scripts
Episode "South Africa: surfer Mick Fanning: shark attack caught on live broadcast" is "coincidentally" also part of setting the stage to strip human cattle from air travel and beyond: also from the beach.
Note: in this case DOUBLE doesn't refer to audiences but rather to agendas.

Notes
Nov 30, 2016 - Plane Carrying Doomed Brazilian Soccer Team Ran Out of Fuel Before Crash:
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/pl...-crash-n690281

CONTEXT
Parallel script where Brazil's wonder team Chapecoense was casted: exposed by Last Prophet 20 months earlier.
Mockery of sports at the end of the show: Parallel script's core
Human cattle has no memory, 20 months is way too long for anyone to wonder about the real "coincidence".
The first episode, the Argentina crash 2015 was meant to leave the audience wondering about this:
- Olympians casted in a reality show named "Dropped" only to be dropped in helicopter crash
http://parallel-and-reversed.blogspo...m-dropped.html

BASICS
Why oil price is half of its average production cost in the USA: - for dummies
Two main reasons:
1. From "Putin" to Venezuela, from Saudi Arabia to Iran, from Nigeria to Angola: ALL illuminazi puppets transferring as much oil as they can to illuminati depots.
2. The oil futures currently being traded are not meant to be actually supplied.
http://good-economics.blogspot.com/2...-below-us.html

Terminating the world as the human cattle knows it - there's no place for relaxing at the beach in the coming world of global slavery.
Psy-ops setting the stage to strip human cattle from the beach:
Fake shark attacks series: surf pro Mick Fanning in South Africa, after episodes in waters previously uncharted by sharks, from North Carolina to Tasmania:
- same as the two Malaysia Airlines Boeings, staged numerologically embedded in 777's "order out of chaos", this time hidden in plain sight.
- same as 9/11, another supposedly "live on TV" hoax.

Ibrahim Mat Zin "Raja Bomoh" #fundie thestar.com.my

Raja Bomoh 'protects' Malaysia from North Korea

PETALING JAYA: Malaysia’s “Raja Bomoh Sedunia” has volunteered his services to assist the country in yet another time of need – this time to protect us from a North Korean nuclear attack.

A three-minute 18-second video of Ibrahim Mat Zin, who calls himself Raja Bomoh Sedunia Nujum VIP with the title of Datuk Mahaguru, conducting a ritual on a beach has gone viral.

The video features Ibrahim and three assistants ankle-deep in water with two coconuts, a pair of sticks used as binoculars, five bamboo cannons, a carpet, and a bowl of seawater.

Ibrahim, who is wearing a business suit, recites prayers throughout the ritual and then vehemently throws the coconuts into the water as it ends.

A cameraman can be seen in the background recording the entire session.

There is also a disclaimer in the video, saying that you are forbidden to conduct the ritual at home.

“This time, the ritual is to protect Malaysia from any threat or attack from other countries especially North Korea,” Ibrahim was quoted as saying in a Malay portal.

“Besides that, the ritual is also to soften the North Korean Supreme Leader’s heart so he will release the 11 Malaysians immediately and resolve this (Kim Jong-nam assassination) situation,” he added.

Explaining that the bamboo cannon is symbolic, he said the ritual is not to provoke any party but is a cautionary measure to ensure that the conflict will be resolved soon.

North Korea barred all Malaysians from leaving the hermit kingdom on March 7, after Malaysia expelled North Korean ambassador Kang Chol as a result of souring diplomatic ties after the assassination of Jong-nam.

Two Malaysians who are employees of the United Nations World Food Programme were allowed to leave the country on Thursday, leaving nine others still stranded there.

A controversial figure, Ibrahim first made headlines in March 2014 when he conducted two rituals at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport to supposedly locate the missing Malaysian Airlines MH370 flight.

Gerhard #fundie premierchristianity.com

Perfect Love: don't be so patronising, please. I am well aware of the difference between love and sex and, more importantly, loving sex. Surely, it is up to the individual to calculate any risks they choose to take in life, not up to you - and that counts for all risks, not just in regard to sexuality. Would you condemn smoking cigarettes and drinking alcohol in the same way? Personally, I think cigarette smoking is disgusting, as well as a major health risk but as long as it doesn't pollute my air space or that of vulnerable people, I have to affirm another's right to smoke - they know the risks to themselves. Likewise with alcohol and other drugs - if using them impacts negatively on others (and it often does) then it is wrong - some might label it a sin. The common denominator here is consent. I should imagine that there's a whole host of risky stuff that some heterosexuals do in the bedroom which their bodies were not actually designed for. Where does that figure on your list of abominations??
The arrogance of conservative Christians is that they believe that only THEY know the difference between right and wrong. Let me correct them: it is printed on our hearts when we accept Jesus. It is just not OK to say that the Bible contradicts what Jesus has printed on our hearts. To do so is clearly viewing the Bible through a human lens and not the lens of Jesus.

Gerhard: Guess you need a PhD to understand the simplest of instructions. If you do not understand the the abuse of the female body is equally detestable but need explicit instructions to figure that one out, then tell me why the bible does not tell you to breathe in and to breathe out but you do so. Clearly you must have been told :-)
I do not know what tatoo you got on your heart, but your understanding of Jesus appears rather limited He clearly taught people to respect creation. He told us to sin no more and to love one another like he loved us. That would exclude to dishonour each other by performing unnatural acts.
Romans 1:24
Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves.
Guess you need more explicit wording
see more

Perfect Love: did you respond to my intelligent and articulate post in any way?? That would be a resounding "no"! Pathetic!

Gerhard: "did you respond to my intelligent and articulate post in any way?"
I replied to your last comment. Which post do you think of?

Perfect Love: no, you didn't. You never even referred to the comments I made. I'm blocking you as you are a loose cannon.

Gerhard: Good luck sticking your head in the sand. Guess that is libertarian Christianity for you :-) I'd wish you would engage in logically coherent argumentation instead.
You asked if abominations were acceptable if committed by heterosexual couples and you should have seen the clear "no" in my reply.
Abominations do not become acceptable when two parties agree to them with each other, irrespective of theri sexual orientation

waiting1 #fundie rr-bb.com

What kills me is that back in the 60's they conjectured by the Red Shift that the universe is expanding, and because the Mount Palomar Telescope could only see 4.5 to 5 Billion light years into space and therefor that was how old the Earth was and then they did all their crazy dating based on this reference point. I am amazed at how they hide their reasoning and facts. Why? because they now have the Hubble Telescope seeing 16.5 Billion light years into space yet they haven't readjusted their data based on this revelation, and they won't do it because it will expose their lies.

Anybody watch the loggers on TV, especially the water loggers ( no pun intended ) the cypress that has been underwater for about 50 to 100 years has absorbed minerals in the wood from the water to the extent that it gives a dazzling shimmering look to the wood when it is cut and sanded. If this fossilization / mineralization can happen with just 10 to 20 feet of pressure under water, then it stands to reason any animal or person who was swept away in the flood and the intense pressure of the great depths the flood buried all this debris under as shown:

Genesis 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
22 1/2 feet higher than the highest point on Earth.

This fossilization / mineralization would occur in a very short time.

They just won't accept the Truth about the flood and that it was about 4,000 years ago.

rachel3108 #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Disney released the trailer for "Alice Through the Looking Glass" on 11.5, one of the dates featured on the arrows next to Alice on the Year in 2015 Economist cover.

The trailer begins with the Disney castle logo that begins to tilt off center to the rhythm of a ticking clock.

"Pan features a ticking clock and Suicide Squad has a crooked wind-up effect, and Alice blends the two by having a ticking clock that twists the castle logo." (See link for gif) [link to whatculture.com]

The release date for Alice Through the Looking Glass is 5/27/2016, the weekend before a grand cross alignment at the four animals of Ezekiel's chariot.

The four animals of Ezekiel's chariot were part of an alignment featured in Gaspar's work that would signal an impending pole shift at the transition of the ages.

"In his book the Celestial clock, Dr. Gaspar reveals that St. John was schooled in celestial mechanics and used meaningful astrological signs and symbols to develop a simple yet sophisticated weather warning system. In this end-time prophecy scenario, he used the animal signs of the Zodiac, the bull, eagle, lion and scorpion, to direct us to specific constellations in the night sky. For that cataclysm will be activated, Gaspar learned, in the "crossing" of these four cardinal compass points as they simultaneously over lay and converge upon the center axis of our galaxy, sun and earth thereby shaking the world tree to the ground, literally." - John Jay Harper, Tranceformers: Shamans of the 21st century p. 170

“When the day becomes the night, and the sky becomes the sea. When the clock strikes heavy, and there’s no time for tea, and in our darkest hour before my final rhyme, she will come back home to wonderland, and turn back the hands of time,” Alan Rickman’s Blue Caterpillar says over scenes from the fantasy. [link to time.com]

The grand cross at Ezekiel's chariot takes place on the new moon of Sivan in the Pleiades. One week later is the festival of Shavuot or Pentecost, on June 13.

In the NBC series Heroes Reborn, June 13 is the date around which much of the show revolves that redefines the relationship between evolved humans and those who seek to control humanity by demonizing and squelching the possibility of evolution whilst building for themselves means of escaping the coming earth changes by co-opting the evolved humans' powers.

In order to save the future, key characters aware of the plot travel back in time to June 13 to attempt to change the course of events - without stepping on butterflies - so that the evolved humans can carry out their mission for which they were planted on earth - to hold down poles of the new earth as the earth goes through a pole reversal.

The pole reversal and the evolution ("Alice through the Looking Glass") are two sides of the same coin. Thus Alice on the Economist cover in November 2015 begins a process by which the events of June 13 can be channeled for birth rather than destruction. The merkabah/light body serves as an ark to traverse the waves of change by means of drawing other dimensions down to earth through the looking glass.

BraveErudite #fundie forums.christianity.com

Was the person that invented those sports thinking about what pleases God? or Was the person that invented those outfits or uniform thinking of what pleases God? No! They were thinking about style, fashion and comfort. Sports or water sports can be played with different clothing, maybe not as comfortable but still possible, but again they are not thinking about people lusting, or holyness or God. They more thinking about winning and comfort. What's first? Salvation or Winning the game or even playing the game. If the sports requires you to wear bathing suits kind of clothing or anything that shows too much skin making it provocative don't play it. Yes I said DON"T PLAY IT!!! All you have given me are excuses to justify the outfits. The word of God doesn't contradicts itself or make exception about this. You have a hard time accepting it because you have lived thinking like this for a while, but if you really want to follow Christ, follow Him all the way and not half way. I answer you a few post back (the ones that matters) but you are the one not reading them. I live in Puerto Rico and we have all the water sports you have @ the main land (P.R. U.S. Territory) We are not some third world country were we don't have water sports, but to me doesn't make a difference if I live close to the beach to understand your point. You asked: Should gymnasts wear spacesuits? You really sound smart asking this...sad.Man made sports = culture doesn't justify wearing whatever you want. Please stop making excuses. Please find me in the Bible were it says is ok to show lots of skin. Where does God make the exception ? You have indeed shamed yourself.