Why are some oldcels lile me obsessed by jb?
Os iy because we have never experienced teemage love in high like most normies do? Sometimes I feel a little like the Humbert guy drom Lolita who is also stuck in his youth.
Why are some oldcels lile me obsessed by jb?
Os iy because we have never experienced teemage love in high like most normies do? Sometimes I feel a little like the Humbert guy drom Lolita who is also stuck in his youth.
Trannymaxxing Case studies
One such incel-turned-transgender who has contacted one of the writers at Incel Wiki has elaborated on this situation. However since she has asked not to be identified, we at Incel Wiki will avoid naming her as well as avoiding directly quoting her by slightly altering her account. Lets call her Leslie. Although Leslie was born male, she began to try to pass as a female, initially by tucking, using a gaff (device that hides the mooseknuckle), cleavage enhancement, hip and buttock padding, crossdressing and using breast prostheses; later by going through a physical transition. Leslie felt that her penis and balls were useless body parts that served no purpose. The pointlessness of her male genitalia is what triggered gender dysphoria in her. Leslie did this because she struggled to gain the attention of women. She believed it wouldn't be too difficult to change gender identity as she already had a small frame, and had minimal secondary sexual characteristics. She specifically said that being male "sucked" because of the prolonged sexlessness. She also said that if she had not altered his/her gender identity, the trauma of inceldom was so bad she considered going to Belgium or Switzerland as these two countries are considered the easiest places for entering a "mercy killing" or "suicide tourism" arrangement. In Leslie's words, the research they had done suggested both countries were considered the "euthanasia capitals" of the western world. Transitioning made Leslie change her mind. She began to understand why prostitution is usually a 1-way street of men buying sex from women; not the other way around. Its because of the mismatch in demand, Leslie posited. Becoming a woman she learnt first-hand that the ease of access to sex was as different as night and day between men and women. Women are stupendously privileged in this regard as Leslie soon found out. Leslie decided to transition because she wanted to experience this female-specific privilege for herself. After changing gender identity, she had no difficulties attracting partners of either sex. Leslie was no longer lonely. She specifically said, and emphasized, that she would have never transitioned had it not been for the inexhaustibility of male inceldom. Leslie felt that some her earlier traits as a male, which made her repulsive or off-putting to potential suitors, such as shyness and awkwardness, suddenly were seen as tenable traits in the dating scene. Leslie's transition according to her e-mail has been successful and she now happily lives as an allosexual sex-having passing transwoman. According to Leslie, from her tweens, to her teens and during early adulthood she was completely a cisgender man. Only once Leslie reached their tricenarian years did they begin doubting the viability of their gender with regards to prolonged loneliness, thus subsequently decided that transitioning to a woman was the right choice.
The Leslie case study above shows how dramatic inceldom can be to a man's quality of life. Inceldom can in fact make a man feel so gloomy, that some involuntary celibates feel that despite being comfortably cisgender one's entire life, they suddenly feel gender dysphoria in the midst of one's adulthood. Feeling like their genitalia don't belong. Like having a penis is liability and disadvantage in the dating scene. That being male makes one unprivileged in the dating scene. As of 2019, no studies have been done yet on the pathway from inceldom to transgenderism, but the Leslie case study shows that this pathway does exist. How much of today's transgender population are formerly incel? We don't know ... yet.
The scores for the new Pokémon X and Y games have been very positive but some disagree. The Satanist’s Sect of America has given a fairly negative review of the games saying Nintendo did not do their best to recruit new Satanists with X and Y.spoonandsatanbothstartwithsMany have claimed that Nintendo’s long-running Pokémon series has satanic or anti-Christian properties that have corrupted children since 1998 starting with Pokémon Red and Blue in America. The Satanists’s Sect of America has no qualms admitting that the series does indeed recruit children on the most recent Satan’s Calling podcast giving their review of Pokémon X and Y. The following is a transcript from Monday’s podcast:
Priestess Evir: So, let’s talk about Pokémon X and Y. I know many listeners are awaiting our review of these games. After all, many claim that this is the key to finally revolutionizing the Satanist movement. Unfortunately, I don’t think it will happen.
Master Osias: I have to agree. Nintendo gave us our review copies last Wednesday and I have been going through X while Evir has been playing Y. They’re fun and I don’t doubt children would love playing it too, but they’re probably not going to be converted anytime soon.
Evir: There have been many changes to the game but maybe we should begin with the starting Pokémon.
Osias: Yes, let’s. I think Nintendo is still the best at hiding Pokémons true intentions even if the intentions weren’t executed the best. For example, the new fire starter.
Evir: Yeah, she shows her true colors in the second and third evolutions.
Osias: I agree, she is a classic Satanist Pokémon. Unfortunately, she’s the only one in the game that I feel could corrupt children. And speaking of the starting Pokémon, they brought back the original three: Charmander, Squirtle and Bulbasaur.
Evir: Those took me back. Way back. I remember when those games came out and our sect grew so quickly. Now it’s kind of like a funny reminder of how things used to be. I don’t think Chamander has that quality anymore that made children become Satanists back in the 90s. It’s nice for us oldies to reminisce on, but it’s just nostalgia, nothing more.
Osias: They even introduced a new evolution for Alakazam called Mega Alakazam. Unfortunately, it does not reintroduce the star that is lost when Kadabra evolves into Alakazam that made children so fascinated by pentagrams way back when. All this nostalgia for nothing.
Evir: Let’s move on from the subject and talk about one of the more exciting features of the game.
Osias: Out of all the disappointment Nintendo has caused, they did give us a glimmer of hope for the next Pokémon games with the introduction of the fairy type.
Evir: Fairy is clearly code for Satanic, there’s no other way to interpret that.
Osias: And the Pokémon they chose to become fairies all have magical Satanic abilities like Jigglypuff and Clefable. It’s a masterstroke by Nintendo as I think the next game will have tons of fairies.
Evir: In a way, X and Y are probably setting the stage for the next Pokémon games.
Osias: Sort of. I think the reason we actually decided to review these games was because Nintendo tried real hard this time after years of dormancy in supporting Satanists.
Evir: Agreed. But there’s still a long way to go if they ever want to make a new Pokémon Red or Blue. The sky battle feature is a clear affront to God since it’s about Satanic monsters fighting in heaven. But I have a feeling it will not show up again in future games.
Osias: And they pushed that 3D effect so much which would have worked great to brainwash children. Then they chickened out with the 2DS. One step forward, two steps back. Typical Nintendo.
Evir: We have to give Pokémon X and Y a six out of ten. Now, this week’s selected chantings by Osias."
The two later commented again about the games saying that Nintendo might not actually be targeting children with Pokémon X and Y. Evir reasoned that no adult could possibly be playing the game simply like a children’s game and that Nintendo is only trying to restore the faith of ex-Satanists.
The ages of women and their characteristics and experiences at these ages are as follows.
According to Heartiste, "This is the age from teenager to mid-20s when a woman is in her nubile prime. Physically and emotionally she is at her horniest, her most feminine, and, not coincidentally, her most discriminating. She’s on the prowl for an alpha male, and specifically for a charming jerkboy whose devil-may-care attitude speaks so forcefully to her deep desire to submit to a top tier man with limitless lover options."
He also notes, "Hard to believe, but it is often easier to bed a very young woman than an older woman, if you are an older man. This is because 20-40% of women are specifically attracted to older men. It is hard-wired in them, and this hard-wiring can be reinforced by poor family upbringing resulting from divorce of parents or absentee fathers. Single moms are the greatest source of future generations of slutty daughters the world has ever known. . . . You can bang an 18-21 year old surprisingly quickly because they have little ASD (anti-slut defense). This is because they do not have the long history of sluttiness common to older women which needs to be rationalized away by posturing as a paragon of chaste virtue. A young woman simply won’t perceive sex with you as an admission of sluttiness. She is innocent to herself as well as to you."
Roosh notes, "She is child-like and mostly intolerable. Her speech sounds like another language. She will only have sex when completely trashed, and has few redeeming qualities beyond her body. Says a lot of things that make you think you’re wasting your time. Best game to use: jealousy."
Hank Moody notes that a girl 21-25 "appreciates that I'm not writing her odes about my undying love and affection, and seem to want to keep things casual. They're getting hit up at every angle, and they're confused about whether they want to fuck the bartender or the lawyer. Then they realize they can do both with little ramification. I like being seen around town with them. Horrible conversationalists, and I have to dumb down my text messaging. Most of their texts are 'lol ur funny..' Society has told these girls that they can be total whores with no consequences, and eventually some good looking rich guy will scoop them up."
The four-year carnival called college is coming to a close. During this time, she’s enjoyed the absolute ride of her life: non-stop parties (as a true Carousel rider), trips, and gorging herself on the buffet of cock available to an American college girlwithout the uncomfortable social stigmas of generations past. At a time where previous generations of women were getting nervous if they hadn’t snared a husband, today’s girl is “just getting started.” At this age, today’s girl is irretrievably drunk on her power. Any cautionary advice will be greeted with hubristic ridicule and disbelief.
Roissy notes, "The 23-27 year old feels she is at her attractiveness peak, despite her peak having passed a few years earlier. This is because she is surrounded by many more high status men than she was while in college (or working at the Piggly Wiggly) who are expressing sexual interest in her. This social dynamic will work to inflate her ego beyond the bounds of her actual beauty ranking."
The first alertswhich go unheededthat this ride isn’t forever start to rear their heads. The combination of a few harsh pump-and-dumps, and the knowledge that some of her smarter friends are getting hitched, start to impart a hard edge on her personality. Still, with ample beauty left over, most girls will continue to draw from the bank account with impunity. Heartiste writes, "During this age window late 20s to late 30s a woman is powerfully aware of the beginning of decline in her number one asset: her beauty. Physically, she is noticing small changes in herself the first nascent signs of decay that, assessed from a distance relative to womanhood as a whole aren’t so horrifying, but compared to what she was herself just a few years earlier will split her id wide open. Urgency compels her (if she’s psychologically healthy) to escape the single lady lookatme scene and start seriously buckling down to achieve the goal of snagging a man who will commit to her and, hopefully, help her become part of a family. Naturally, this pressure to settle limits her options and the longer she waits, the more her “Mr. Right” will deviate from the Mr. Right of her teenage dreams."
According to Roosh, "After you wear the t-shirt a couple of times, the fabric loses elasticity. You no longer get excited when wearing it because people have already seen you in it. Your eye starts to wander on new t-shirts (25-29 years old)." Also, according to Roosh's T-shirt analogy, "When you leave the loaf out, it gets a little hard. You have to heat it up with a toaster first, but it still won’t taste fresh. (25-29 years old)"
Roosh also writes, "single women over 25 are emotionally damaged in some way, are alpha widowed, or are professional daters who are incapable of making the proper relationship sacrifices."
Hank Moody notes that a girl 26-30 is "Still hot enough to be seen around town with, but they start throwing serious girlfriend vibes - particularly public displays of affection. Sex is practically thrown at you after a few months of dating. You're that good looking rich guy who is going to scoop them up. They know the biological clock is ticking fast, and their family is pushing them to 'settle down.'"
Rollo notes, "By the age of 27 women’s SMV decline has begun in earnest. That isn’t to say that women can’t remain stunningly attractive and vivacious in their post-peak years, but comparative to the next crop of 22-23 year olds, the decline progressively becomes more evident. Competition for hypergamously suitable mates becomes more intense with each passing year. The age’s between 27 and 30 are subliminally the most stressful for women as the realization sinks in that they must trade their party years’ short term mating protocol for a long term provisioning strategy."
Roissy notes, "28-30 year olds are a mixed bunch. Some are riding a wave of career and social success that has nowhere to go but down, and their bloated egos reflect that. Others, less conventionally successful, are emotionally frazzled by the disappearing act of their heady youth and by the intractability of their singledom. You will find some of the cuntiest, and sweetest, girls in this age range."
After repeated pressings of the snooze button, it starts getting harder to ignore the clangor of the alarm clock. Having gotten her fill on the party lifestyleand starting to feel, if not fully understand, the diminished effectiveness of her fading looksshe declares herself “ready to settle down.” Regrettably, the combination of having very little beauty-capital remaining and impossibly high standardsthe product of years of enjoying the high life at the expense of her future solvencywill conspire to keep her single.
According to Roosh, "If you leave the bread out for too long, mold develops. You can cut away the mold, toast the bread, and still be able to eat it, but you won’t enjoy it. You’d have to be starving. (30-34 years old)"
Hank Moody notes that a girl 30-36 "Is either divorced or has never been married for a reason. Anthropomorphizes their dog or cat. Struggles with depression issues. Sex is thrown at you. They know that the good looking rich guy is never going to come, and you're simply here for sex and conversation. At this point they would settle for almost any beta willing to commit and risk a geriatric pregnancy."
Heartiste notes that "a man marrying an over-30 woman is investing everything he has in a rapidly depreciating pleasure provider that has already lost a lot of its aesthetic value."
The over-30 woman has likely amassed an impressive knob count. When you marry a 30+ woman, you’re marrying her 30+ cockas. Hope you like getting phantom cucked! As magically prehensile as your penis may be, she’ll never look up to it in cross-eyed awe like she did with her first cock when she was younger, hotter, tighter, and inexperienced.
The over-30 woman is bitter from a wasted prime spent on failed relationships she hoped would lead to marriage. Now that you’re marrying her, she should be grateful, but she's not. . . . .
There’s another, subtle, reason to refuse the wedded diss of marrying the over-30 woman. Now, naturally, if you marry an under-30 woman, the day will come, ostensibly, that she’ll be your over-30 wife. But you’ll have something that chagrined men who married women on the cusp of sagging cups don’t have: Years of very fond, very monopolized, very supple memories. If you maritally snag a 21-year-old minx and occupy her sugar walls for the next ten years, the spermatomically bonded cervix-splattered glue of all those splendid tumbles of passion accrue into something larger than the sum of your individuated speckles. All that young woman heat, heat which will never be replicated with the older version of your wife, captures into limbic amber a network of interlocked, superconductive emotions with the power to sustain lovingrapture a good ways past the poignantly brief era of peak wife ripeness, onward into the elevator muzak era of bland marital inertia (50 years, plus or minus).
You marry an over-30 woman and you’re left grasping at a grease truck menu of curdled, pear-shaped memories and wrinkled recollections for sustenance.
According to trav777, "a woman at 31 is looking for a marriage and kid as a BUCKET LIST ITEM. She is not looking for a husband or a partner or obligations. If she were into that more than herself, she’d have landed a decent man 10 years prior."
Relampago Furioso notes that at 30, the thousand cock stare often develops.
In some ways, women in the 31-34 age range are the toughest broads to game. (By “toughest”, it is meant “most time consuming”.) It’s counterintuitive, yes, but there are factors at work besides her declining beauty which mitigate against the easy, quick lay. For one, it is obviously harder to meet single 31-34 year old women than it is to meet single younger women. Marriage is still a pussy-limiting force to contend with for the inveterate womanizer, but Chateau apprentices are hard at work battling the scourge of mating market disturbances caused by the grinding and churning of the marriage machine.
But the bigger reason 31-34 year olds are harder to game than any other age group of women has to do with the wicked nexus of entitlement and self-preservation that occurs at this age in women. When you combine a disproportionate sense of entitlement fueled by years of feminism, steady paychecks and promotions, and cheerleading gay boyfriends with suspicions of every man’s motives and a terrible anxiety of being used for a sexual fling sans marriage proposal, you get a venom-spitting malevolent demoness on guard against anything she might perceive as less than total subjugation to her craving for incessant flattery and princess pedestaling.
The magical years are officially gone, and the long descent to complete invisibility to the opposite sex is well underway. Thanks to social programming (e.g., Sex in the City and the myth that “a woman’s sexual prime is in her 30s”), she can rationalize that her “Mr. Right” will arrive any minute. However, she’s likely to become little more than a second- or third-stringer in a player’s long roster of options. A few of these women will get bailed out by blue-pill betas, who still buy into the marriage trap, and don’t realize (or care) they’re buying a used car with the odometer rolled back. But this marriage is almost certainly doomed to divorce-failure, since nothing can ever compete with her 15-year prime-time binge. She will be nagged by dissatisfaction the moment her last partyher weddingends.
She enjoyed the Sweet 15, but she’ll enjoy little more.
GBFM writes that with 32-year-olds, it's necessary to get a "leaf-blower to get all the dust off".
According to Roosh's T-shirt analogy, "Eventually, holes develop in the fabric. It has been used too many times. Now it is only good to clean the toilet bowl before finally being placed in the trash. (35 and up)." Also, according to his bread analogy, "If you leave it for even longer, mold takes over and completely destroys the bread. There is no way to excise the toxic portions. You must throw it away before the mold makes you sick. (35 and up)" Relampago writes:
Women “expire” at age 35 for numerous reasons. Their fertility declines sharply at this age. Their beauty declines, no matter how much makeup they cake on. If not already married to her, from this moment forward she offers nothing to a partner but a well-used piece of anatomy and a manipulative, even predatory disposition towards men and their finances.
The expiration date may fluctuate around age 35 for a couple of reasons, i.e. good genetics or a sweet personality (usually being faked) but this age is a good baseline for the “expiration date” for females.
Heartiste writes, "The final romantic life cycle for women (ages 40-death), this stage is the longest and, sadly from the perspective of one who adores women when they are at their most womanish, the dreariest, though it does offer as consolation a tranquilizing serenity that can safely usher a woman through her middle years without resort to painkillers. In this cycle, a woman still harbors those tingles for the alpha jerk, but they are sufficiently suppressed by biomechanic winding-down and stone cold circumstance her wilted bloom to allow the flourishing of her other female needs. Those other needs center around her desire to a) not be abandoned to a cold cruel sexual market and b) enjoy at least facsimiles of reciprocal love so that she does not feel abandoned within her relationship."
Tolkien and the Illuminati: The dark side of LOTR
Think of the great eye of Sauron, the all-seeing eye which symbolizes NWO and echelon surveillance. Think of Mellon, the password to get in the Moria, the name of an Illuminati and bankers' dynasty. Think of the semiotics surrounding the Dark Lord, think of the ambiguity of Gandalf (a wizard? Or an "incarnate angel», as stated Tolkien?), of the weird initiations of the hobbits, think of the compelling hunger for rings, jewels and of course bloodlines, not to mention the omnipresence of orcs, dragons and monsters, and you can easily guess that there is a dark side in Tolkien universe: and after all, isn't he a British gentleman? Let's not explore my devilish side, quipped once Hitchcock in France. Britain has been during all Victorian age and later a land of witchcraft, of golden dawns and of many occult societies of writers and researchers. There is nothing neutral in British pop culture. This is what makes her so fascinating and so efficiently working on the masses.
Yet the gigantic proportions of Tolkien success are not reassuring, and many researchers, not all Christians, seem to think that Tolkien was on the dark side of the force, even if he was a devout catholic and a presumably traditional mind; he could easily been manipulated by superior forces and sources. Curious and insane Narnia of his boring friend CS Lewis confirm this unfair assertion, with its creepy centaurs and talkative fauns, Lucifer courts, fake quests and sinister lion-god.
Of course we can say that Tolkien mainly denounces what he describes... But is that so sure? Was Tolkien a counter initiate, or was he a mere eye-opener, to take Sam's words in the cavern of Moria, whose message would have been distorted by the Illuminati who control media and video-game industry?
Talking of Moria, I know a place in Spain called Moria. It's in Santander, Cantabria, and it designates a cliff that serves as pasture. There are other curious names in Spain and northern Portugal which are related to Tolkien: Gondor, Gondomar... all connected to legendary and Celtic Galicia and Compostella, this magic and telluric road of the western initiates prior to Christianity. But what is the secret meaning of the Moria? Is it material, a metal, a source of rich, or a rare raw material? Ask Gandalf but don't dig too much:
The Dwarves tell no tale; but even as mithril was the foundation of their wealth, so also it was their destruction: they delved too greedily and too deep, and disturbed that from which they fled, Durin's Bane.
In his famous book upon the Illuminati and the mind control (and as Tolkien has inspired so many games and dungeons and dragons...), Fritz Springmeier writes of the Moria that it designates the hierarchy of the Illuminati! About the rings and the opus, he even writes:
Rings are also used to signify what activity the slave is doing, and what rank or level they are in the occult... Some Illuminati survivors are always looking for a ring. Rings play a significant part in the lives and programming of slaves. One section that is coding-programming found in J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings is "One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind then."
The lord of the rings is Sauron: so he is the main character; the heroes are labelled fellowship of the ring. So they depend on the ring. This is too Illuminati agenda. There is another key-word connecting Tolkien good guys to Illuminati: bloodlines. Aragorn, who wears the winged disc in the movie, descends from Isildur the sinner, and feels weak for that reason; but for that reason too he will be the king, a restorer of a new order - the fourth age. His strange wife, Arwen, a Jungian silhouette of his soul, will not be happy too to lose her immortality. But it is too late.
In the Silmarillion, Tolkien creates too an uncertain mythology and horror; he was so fond of his worlds that he designed during fifty years dynasties, genealogies, thus presenting the horrendous manipulations of Melkor:
There countless became the hosts of his beasts and his demons, and the race of the Orcs, bred long before, grew and multiplied in the bowels of the earth... and thus did Melkor breed the hideous race of the Orcs in envy and mockery of the Elves, of whom they were afterwards the bitterest foes.... This it may be was the vilest deed of Melkor, and the most hateful to Ilúvatar.
Orcs comes from Virgil's creation (Orcus, the death), a source too much ignored by the commentators (after all, Tolkien could speak fluently Latin, and Virgil wrote the best epic ever).The gloomy creation of Tolkien mixes now with our own brave new world made up of biotech and artificial breeding. Some conspiracy theorists could join Tolkien too in their descriptions of reptilian-like persons and leaders (think of the name of Sauron). We can also say that the pagan gods of Tolkien behave like the dei otiosi of Mircea Eliade, the lazy gods who have retired from this world and who are omnipresent in primitive mythologies. They have abandoned us, hastening the despair of great Noldor leader Feanor.
Some others will notify that Tolkien defends a wrong dualistic conception (which is somewhat Manichean, I mean, strictly heretical from a Christian point of view) of the world with a powerful source of evil, sometimes superior to the good one. The progressive and implacable destruction of the middle-earth in the Silmarillion (named after the jewels!) is somewhat depressing. Is our world sentenced to such a death?
We have been many times told about German and Nordic roots of Tolkien works. Yet Melkor name has a Sumerian resonance, and so has Tolkien pantheon with his many gods and goddesses inspired by various Mesopotamian mythologies. These lazy gods look like weird oriental deities, whom the prophets and our bible thought no good at all.
And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the LORD, and served Baalim... And they forsook the LORD, and served Baal and Ashtaroth. (Judges, 2, 11)
So, was our good Christian forgetting his religion while writing his fantasy books? One may say that is just kid stuff...yeah! This was the case too for Mary Poppins, for Peter Pan, for the wizard of Oz, all devised by minds involved in the occult, in masonry or in theosophy! The Illuminati agenda matches perfectly, and so do the conspiracy theories, when it comes to children's literature or to children's movies!
As Melkor plays (wields, says Tolkien) with fire and cold, a little bit like Nazi scientist Horbiger, and dreams like Leonardo di Caprio that he is the king of the world, an horrible spider grows in the dark, but not in an hazardous place:
There, beneath the sheer walls of the mountains and the cold dark sea, the shadows were deepest and thickest in the world; and there in Avathar, secret and unknown, Ungoliant had made her abode.
Why the hell James Cameron chose that name, Avatar? Amazing pop culture!
But let's not change the matter and let's conclude, opening new gates: it is clear that a book like LOTR opens our minds and our eyes to another reality. I think that Tolkien was sometimes overwhelmed by his talent and imagination (sixty thousand pages of manuscript: where was he getting himself and us to?); but he challenged and analyzed - I shall get back to these points - the perils of modern world, "magic" (technology) and industrialization, IE the destruction of any wild or traditional landscape. He saw too, like Lovecraft, that we are surrounded by mysterious, forgotten and ubiquitous monsters. But who needed to awaken them, except video game industry?
I give the last word to the Illuminati Gandalf, reminding my readers that in Hebrew (as well as in Arabic) Anor means...the light.
"I am a servant of the Secret Fire, wielder of the flame of Anor. You cannot pass. The dark fire will not avail you, flame of Udûn. Go back to the Shadow! You cannot pass."
Video footage caught Maine Democreeps cheering the rise in suicides among White men.
For anyone living in a cave the past few years who might not understand the depth of anti-White hatred to which the Demokreep Klown Kollective has sunk, now you see the chameleonic enemy in its uncamouflaged malevolence.
"After saying the Democrats need to encourage more “young people” and “women” to join their party, Fochtmann said: “Today, you know, I saw a thing that said a lot of men, white men, are committing suicide. I almost thought, yeah, great!'”"
“almost”? Don’t sell your hate short, Fuckedman.
" The crowd burst into laughter."
Listen to it. That wasn’t nervous laughter. It was the chortling of bloodthirsty vampires.
" “Then I thought about it little more, and I thought maybe I shouldn’t say that out in public,” he said."
The anti-White equalist leftoids are feeling emboldened to air their hatred openly and remorselessly, helped along by a complicit media and demagogic Dem pols like Pelosi and Waters and cucks like McCain. They have become Chutzpah, destroyer of citizenism.
" The Daily Caller asked Fochtmann to explain his comment:
Fochtmann told The Daily Caller “a joke’s a joke isn’t it?”"
You weren’t joking, fuckermann.
" “I’m a white male."
" I’m an old man,"
The “old man” card. If your age is an excuse for every murderous fantasy you indulge, then maybe it’s time you consider the early self-deliverance option. Otherwise, WAYSA?
" and I’m appalled by what’s happening to a lot of people my age, and their either lack of morality or whatever it is,” he continued."
Whereas your morality shines through like a Mosaic commandment.
" “There’s no big protest going on about [the Trump] administration.”"
There will be a big protest in your backyard soon, if this story catches fire and loosens even the Leftstream Media’s information choke hold.
" “It’s anathema to me. I hear a lot of people out there espousing things about being good Christians, being patriots and what not. We just read different history books. Different Bible, everything.”"
Old Testament man.
" “I don’t really know what to say,” Fochtmann conceded."
Missing a clause: “I don’t really know what to say .that would make me come out smelling like a rose and my White enemies burnt to a crisp on a pyre.”
" “I thought the point of the joke is that it won’t be long, and that this won’t be a majority white nation, and I think that’s a good thing.”"
Your anti-White genocidal intention is noted for the record, Fochtmann. Best pray you have enough old man wisdom to silence your Old Testament man chutzpah during the dangerous interim between your premature gloating and the completion of your beloved demographic displacement-of-Whites-via-open-borders-and-suicidal-despair.
" “I think it’s about time Americans come to terms with we are a melting pot,” he clarified."
Does that melting pot come alloyed with the blown out brains and meth-stopped hearts of millions of White men and women?
" “We’ve been calling ourselves a melting pot forever and ever and ever.”"
If you have to repeat it ad nauseam, then maybe it isn’t the natural state of affairs.
" “So there you are, you know, one of these days we’ll be a big melting pot stew and it won’t predominantly be white people, and that’s ok with me.”"
So there we have the mission statement of the Murderous Left: They won’t be able to achieve Diversitopia with White men gumming up the gears. Whites will have to be dealt with, and since we’re not (yet) at the shooting stage of this war the weapon of choice for the Equalism Dehumanists is mass Dirt World immigration and the killer depression it carries in its silty wake as it washes like a shitnami over the receding Whiteness of Heritage America.
" If that’s the case, why do you choose to live in the second whitest state in the union?"
Good question. As a matter of course, shitlib hypocrisy is so blatant that I coined a word to describe it: Libocrisy. I really need to get going on that Libocrite Watch List post I’ve been meaning to do. You can’t hide from neighborhood demographic data, gentrified-community libfruits!
FYI, here’s a photo of former Maine Senatorial candidate Richard Fochtmann[.]
Hm. What do you guys think? Physiognomy is real, or (((physiognomy israel)))?
The goal is to make it costly for these anti-White signaling fatbags to continue mouthing off about the blessings of an inevitable White minority America: Politically costly, socially costly, and occupationally costly. Do to the Left what the Left has been doing to Heritage America for sixty-plus years. Coax these fuckers outta their rat holes and shame them in the public square. We won’t rid ourselves of this evil, but we can arrange our society so that the fochtmanns of the West have only the company of their padded cells and gloomy bedrooms willing to entertain their genocidal fantasies.
Black Hole Soul
In their eyes, genocide
In disguises chosenite
Hides the hate, lies the snake
And a soul as black as slate
Boiling frog, Whites object
Neath the tact the soul looks dead
Call their name through the ruse
And you’ll hear them claim virtue
Black hole soul
Now we know
You wish upon us pain
Black hole soul
Now we know
Now we know (now we know)
Sophistry, lies and craft
Fool the hearts of the goyim
Times are gone for honest men
And sometimes far too long for snakes
In my land, a stalking leech
And our youth awakening
Blood and soil here to stay
No one gulled like that anymore
Black hole soul
Now we know
You wish upon us pain
Black hole soul
Now we know
Now we know
Black hole soul
Now we know
You wish upon us pain
Black hole soul
Now we know
Now we know
(black hole soul)
(black hole soul)
Now we know
(black hole soul)
(black hole soul)
Now we know
(black hole soul)
(black hole soul)
Now we know
(black hole soul)
(black hole soul)
Lift my head, fight my fear
Till my home is free and clear
Black hole soul
Now we know
You wish upon us pain
Black hole soul
Now we know
Now we know
Black hole soul
Now we know
You wish upon us pain
Black hole soul
Now we know
Now we know
(black hole soul)
(black hole soul)
Dr. Andrés Mateo, a Mexican doctor of philosophy, and a student of parapsychology, particularly of psychic healing, substantiated Andrija’s conviction that Pachita was “a marvelous gift that humanity cannot lose, and had to be spread all over the world.” This Dr. Mateo too had witnessed Pachita’s “breathtaking transplantations,” as he wrote to Andrija. “I have been not only a close witness, but actually an actor or co-actor to her surgical operations which were devoid of any kind of anesthesia or asepsia, or even basic cleanness, with no electric light only a gloomy wax candle, with a dirty rusty knife (more so than Arigo’s), opening with her bare, dirty, bloody hands skin, flesh, tissues, bones, extracting tumors, exchanging whole femurs, or stomachs and transplanting whole brains (!), both kidneys, or a whole uterus. I personally, with my own hands, have helped to keep open both sides of a woman’s skull while Pachita extirpated the woman’s whole brain, and put in its place a whole new one, with bulb hanging and all Something Frankesteinian indeed.”
Claim: The Order of the Illuminati, created by an obscure ex-professor named Adam Weishaupt on May 1, 1776, was the ancestor of the Communist movement and the model for modern subversive conspiratorial movements.
Although relatively little is known about him by way of biographical detail, the life of Adam Weishaupt was immensely consequential. A Jesuit-trained ex-professor of Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt, Weishaupt fell away from the Catholic Church and became a determined enemy of the Christian worldview and the social order built upon it.
Determined to destroy Christian society and rebuild a new humanist order, Weishaupt organized the Order of the Illuminati in Bavaria on May 1, 1776. That date, celebrated by occultists as Beltane, became a universal holiday for Communists and other revolutionaries who trace their heritage to the conspiratorial group founded by Weishaupt.
Behind a carefully wrought facade of humanitarian activism, the Illuminati was organized as a strict hierarchy, with details of the organization's true nature incrementally revealed as the inductee advanced in rank. New initiates were called novices or “minervals”; at that level they were led to believe they had enlisted in a benevolent effort to promote harmony by making mankind into a single family. As he advanced to the rank if Illuminatus Minor, the adept was taught that the only impediment to universal peace and brotherhood was the stubborn bigotry of existing religious and political institutions, which would have to be destroyed or at least brought under the influence of the Order -- in the name of the greater good.
The most vile of Hamm’s comments I think, was this one where he endorsed vigilantism:
"I honestly do believe they do it for all the right reasons, because let’s face it, it’s not paying their mortgage."
Fucking Hell’s bells, is he serious? The most obvious “right reasons” they do it is because they are paedocrites: pathetically trying to hide there own sexual interests in nubile young teenage girls. (Girls, who less than a century ago would have had their own young children and were legally married to the fathers of such children). These paedocritical vigilantes feel guilty because prolonged exposure to destructive, feminist propaganda has made them (WRONGLY) believe that being sexually normal, i.e. being attracted to nubile young teenage girls, is perverted’ or sick’!
For a senior police officer to even think like that, let alone make a comment like that one publicly, is unbelievable and frightening, as it will inevitably lead to a state of anarchy, while he’s also admitting that he and his fellow PIGS are all incompetent and fucking USELESS wimps!
Hope he rots in hell
How did oldcels cope without internet?
Imagine being an Incel between 1960s and early 1990s. There's no internet, how do you cope? Watching TV and reading all day? Playing videogames?
When we got to the [Mexican] border, it was raining and really gloomy outside. I prayed for some sunshine for the duration of my stay in my mom's hometown. When we finally did get there, it was sunny and the sky was blue with only a few clouds. It stayed that way until the day I left. That morning, it began to rain and the sky became cloudy again. There isn't any rational explanation I can offer as to why this happened, but it did happen.
The Western World died in 1945
JFL at coping stormcels who think the prevailing culture in the west isn't western culture. Your ethnostate is a pipe dream. Your pathetic race will be bred out of existence within the next six generations, and it's ridiculous for you to care as genetic waste who can't even find a foid of your race to reproduce with or even date. The western world ended on May 8, 1945, when the National Socialist government formally surrendered to the Allied powers. That was the death knell of the last glimmer of hope for western civilization. It's all barbarism from here, folks. You might as well give up all cope and fall into the freezing embrace of nihilistic abandon.
And don't you ethniccels pretend you wouldn't have been happier if the Third Reich won World War Two. Because your peoples wouldn't have migrated to western countries to be used as cheap labor for the Jewish capitalists, your foids wouldn't have all these white men to pine over while you rot.
It just donned on me how pathetic it is to be a 23 year old virgin
I'm not quite at the oldcel stage yet but I'm past the point of no return, I'm older than Elliot Rodger was when he died. Almost everyone has had sex at one point or another, not being able to get laid when you're past highschool and into your twenties means you are a huge failure. Even if I were to wake up one day and become white, then looksmax to Chadlite level, people would laugh at me if they found out I was a virgin. It's shameful to be a virgin at 17-18, it's even worse when your past that age.
I pray that Blackops2cel gives me strength so that I don't rope tonight.
In 1960, Richard Nixon was supposed to be elected the 35th President of the United States. Nixon was Vice President under President Eisenhower for 8 years and served his long apprenticeship very, very well. The country prospered greatly during the Eisenhower Administration and Nixon would have continued the peaceful policies of his predecessor. Nixon was not an ambitious or power hungry man as he did not try to replace his boss at any time during his Presidency.
The 2 Republican candidates on the same ticket were Richard Nixon and Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. The 2 Democrats were John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. It was definitely not one man one vote, even though the U.S. Constitution calls for separate votes for President and Vice President:
The PERSON having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President. The PERSON having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President. (Twelfth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution).
The Amendment calling for separate votes for President and Vice President in the Electoral College was ratified on September 25, 1804. To get around the provisions of that Amendment, political parties were born, and the President and Vice President were placed on the same ballot. Under that system, there was no way of knowing which candidate received the most popular votes.
2 men of such dissimilar backgrounds as Johnson and Kennedy could not have been found in any country.
Kennedy was the playboy son of a multimillionaire from Massachusetts and Johnson was a Confederate from Texas.
Johnson's exemplars were Juan Perón of Argentina, Fidel Castro of Cuba, and François "Papa Doc" Duvaliermilitary dictator and President for Life of the "Republic" of Haiti.
If Kennedy and Johnson were on separate tickets, only Texans would vote for Johnson, so how could he become Vice President of the entire country? The position of Vice President is just a doorway for an "ambitious man" to replace the President without an election. Nelson Rockefeller used that position to almost steal the Presidency in 1974.
Women voted for Kennedy because he looked better than Nixon on TV!!
The famous Nixon-Kennedy debates on TV were the first of a kind in a Presidential race. As far as looks were concerned, Nixon could not compete with Kennedy As far as brains and diplomatic experience was concerned, it was no contest.
The Nixon-Kennedy debates took place in October 1960.
Vice President Nixon was just recovering from a very serious "accident" and looked disheveled on TV.
On the other hand, Kennedy was telegenic, and looked much more relaxed and confident.
Altogether, there were 4 debates watched by over 70 million people. Little did the women voters realize that Kennedy in the White House almost meant the last time they would ever vote in a Presidential election.
In another bizarre turn of events, Martin Luther King Jr. was arrested for driving without a license and given 4 months hard labor prison time. Martin Luther King Jr., was named after Saint Martin Luther. Can you imagine a Jesuit priest helping Saint Martin Luther to get out of prison?
On Oct. 25, Martin Luther King Jr. was sentenced to 4 months hard labor in prison for driving without a license!!
A phone called from Senator Kennedy secured his release just 2 days later.
Before that time, most blacks were going to vote for Republican Richard Nixon. After that "incident," they switched to Kennedy!!
King returned home in triumph after his release from prison. Here is a quote from a biography of King:
The motorcade started up again and bore King to Ebenezer Church, where eight hundred people greeted him with songs and prayers. " I am deeply indebted to Senator Kennedy, who served as a great force in making my release possible," King had told reporters. "It took a lot of courage for Senator Kennedy to do this, especially in Georgia. For him to be that courageous shows that he is really acting upon principle and not upon expediency." He informed his people that "I never intend to reject a man running for President of the United States just because he is a Catholica reference to his father, who opposed Kennedy strictly on religious grounds. (Oates, Let the Trumpet Sound, p. 165).
The Republican Party was the party of President Lincoln. The Democrats were pro-slavery during the Civil War. Most blacks were definitely pro-Nixon before the providential arrest of Martin Luther King Jr.
Little did the people realize that King was a dyed-in-the-wool Jesuit, and the whole arrest and release was just contrived to help Kennedy reach the White House. The election of 1960 was one of the most corrupt to ever take place in the United States. To this day, nobody really knows who really won the most critical election in the country's history.
President Kennedy made a lightning visit to ex-boss Macmillan in June 1963!!
During the Cuban Missile Crisis, British prime minister Harold Macmillan played the music, while Kennedy turned the sheets. The Crisis almost led to the extinction of the entire human race from radiation poisoning. President Kennedy was very, very upset with Macmillan over the Penkovsky affair, and that big betrayal definitely ended their "special relationship."
President Kennedy began to see that the Russians were more to the trusted than "Uncle Harold," so he proposed a treaty banning nuclear testing in the atmosphere, outer space, and under water. That treaty, called the Partial Test Ban Treaty, formally went into effect in October 1963. Hiring Robert McNamara as defense secretary, and the ban on nuclear testing, were the only 2 good ideas to come out of the entire Kennedy Administration.
In June 1963, President Kennedy made his last trip to Europe. He visited Berlin and then Ireland. After a lightning visit to Macmillan's country estate, he left for Italy and then returned home. Jackie was not with him on that tour and that is why he returned alive!!
On June 29, 1963, President Kennedy made a lightning visit to Birch Grove, the country mansion of Harold Macmillan.
He arrived via helicopter on Saturday evening and was gone by Sunday afternoon.
Kennedy was definitely disgusted with his ex-boss and it showed by the brevity of his visit.
That very brief visit was the last time that Macmillan and Kennedy met. What Kennedy never knew was that the prime minister was still a very dangerous man because he had a secret agent in the very White House.
Prime Minister Macmillan suddenly became sick just before Kennedy's assassination!!
Just before the Kennedy assassination, a lot of things were happening in the life of Prime Minister Macmillan. His doctor suddenly diagnosed him with "prostate cancer" and advised him to enter the hospital for an operation. The prime minister gladly complied with his doctor's advice.
On October 10, 1963, "Supermac" suddenly entered King Edward VII Hospital for a "prostate" operation.
Lilibet visited him in the hospital, and Macmillan told the queen that he wanted his close friend and fellow conspirator, Sir Alex Douglas-Home, to succeed him.
Douglas-Home was given the unpleasant task of attending the President's funeral in Washington City.
Amazingly, Harold recuperated from his "illness" very well, and "Supermac" was never sick again until he went to meet his Maker in 1986. Before the Lincoln assassination, the British ambassador to Washington City suddenly became ill and had to return home.
The Warren Commission said that 3 shots were fired at the President!!
The Warren Commission got it right when it said that 3 shots were fired at the President . . . but they didn't come from "Lee Harvey Oswald."
As the limousine entered Dealey Plaza, Secret Service driver William Greer slowed down almost to a crawl.
Secret Service agent Roy Kellerman turned around and shot the President in the throat.
That shot literally severed his spinal cord and he slumped over to the left. Then Jackie shot him behind his left ear.
After the 2 shots were fired, Jackie leaped on to the back of the limousine, and that was the signal for Clint Hill to join her in the back seat.
Thanks to her panther eyes, the "Pink Panther's" peripheral vision was extraordinary!!
After the pistol shot to her husband's head, she leaped out of her seat on to the back of the limousine.
That was the signal for SS agent Clint Hill to join her in the back.
The 3rd shot, or shots, came from Clint Hill's .38 revolver in the tunnel.
The plot required the President to be dead instantly. With one or 2 shots from Clint Hill's .38 caliber revolver, President Kennedy was definitely dead when he arrived at Parkland Hospital. The trauma doctors did go through the motions of trying to revive him . . . but it was hopeless....Unlike President Lincoln, he did not survive another 9 hours.
Yes, AGW is the latest deus ex machina for the messianically inclined Russian people, who are typically helpless on their own. I’m sure they believe it will solve all their problems and lead to a world of limitless vodka and girls in tight skirts and high heels. There should be an Orthodox Christian global warming Jesus wandering through a methane-emitting birch forest, but there probably already is and the rest of the world simply hasn’t been paying attention.
Siberia should have made the Russians rich long ago, but the problem is that it is under the control of Russians. If it had been available to American settlement, the expanse would be thriving with lumber mills, gas wells and technologically advanced institutions, and the population would be much higher. Down-on-their-luck Americans would be driving tanker trucks across the taiga, wildcatting, selling burgers to the workers and building highways. Instead there are ballistic missile behemoths lumbering on dirt roads through the forests while stunted, alcoholic Asiatic peasants scratch a living out of the frozen swamps and rivers that only flow half the year, scraping the riverbanks for fossil mammoth tusks and shooting beavers.
Tell me I’m wrong.
In accordance with the program laid down in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the Jew, in his devilish cunning, has concocted a number of organizations that seem to be on the side of the White Man. They come in various guises, such as those fighting "communism." These are undoubtedly the most numerous. There are probably more than a hundred in this category in the United States alone and they profess to be ardently patriotic, Christian, and anti-communist.
At the same time they usually are strongly pro-Jew and pro-nigger. Most of them completely confuse the issue, deploring the symptoms of the disease, rather than identifying and fighting the cause of the disease itself, namely the Jew.
Their ridiculous program, it would seem, is to get together with the Jews and the niggers to fight the Jews and the niggers, an obvious contradiction on the face of it. In so doing, they give a powerful mantle of protection to the Jewish network, the root of all our evils.
By far the largest among these is the John Birch Society, headed by that ardent Jew-lover himself, Robert Welch. Well organized and well financed, a lot of the money coming from the Jews themselves and the rest of it coming from concerned and frightened White people who are looking for some organization to lead them out of the mess they are in, the John Birch Society is doing pretty well. In fact, to misquote (slightly) Robert Welch: "We mean (good) business every step of the way." Whereas the Birch Society claims its fight is against communism, its real purpose is to protect the Jewish conspiracy.
What the John Birch Society really does is act as a collecting organization for all those aggressive and militant White racists that would become potential leadership in the fight against the Jews and the niggers. It then sets about to confuse and befuddle their thinking, conjure up a false culprit, namely communism, and the debilitate the White Man's money, time and energy into numerous useless projects which they are dead certain will never lead to any success. Instead of exposing the cause, namely the Jew, it goes after the effects, and protects the cause. Above all it keeps polluting its memberships' minds with bad news, bad news, a feeling that we are completely surrounded, a feeling of frustration and pointlessness, a feeling that the fight is pretty well lost and pretty well over, but we might as well go through the useless motions anyway. It does an excellent job of debilitating, discouraging, demoralizing, and finally neutralizing the White membership. Finally, they give up the fight and in most cases can never again be recruited into a useful constructive fight against the Jews and the niggers.
I say that in most cases. It is not true in all cases. I, myself, am an ex-graduate from the Jewish sponsored John Birch Society, being misled in my early naiveté into thinking that I was going to be able to do something useful in our fight against the Jews and niggers by joining the John Birch Society. Fortunately for our side, and unfortunately for the Jewish cause, a number of more astute and more capable graduates of the John Birch Society do carry on the fight after they see through the Birch hoax.
Why did you question her when she said that? She obviously was not asking for your opinion. It's generally not appropriate for cis people to recenter the point of view and discussions away from a trans person's.
I will guarantee you that she was talking about something when she said that. Cis people do awful things to trans people all day, and it is exhausting when we also have to deal with allies' microagressions.
You're a great ally! We don't want to have to validate that. Don't get defensive about it. Just listen when we're birching about something without making it about you.
They see things the way I do: where any relationship between two people, irrespective of their age, sex ,or status is a PRIVATE matter between those people and there is no need for anyone else, let alone the totalitarian feminist state and the police to interfere with their private lives, especially when such consensual and loving relationships are harming NOBODY.
There is however, one exception:
The only people who are harmed’ in such liaisons are those sexually JEALOUS and embittered, older feminists and that’s really what all the noise and hysteria is all about. Protecting children’ is in fact the furtherest thing from their minds! They know all too well that nobody is ever harmed (never mind children’) in any consensual sexual activity and certainly nobody ever becomes a victim’ from such activities, as the young blonde woman so angrily made clear in the first of the 3 videos.
Feminists simply generate this hysteria about paedophiles’ motivated by their bitter sexual jealousy, in order to prevent their younger rivals enjoying sexual relationships with older men.
They really think that if they can prevent men from being allowed to interact (sexually) with younger females, through constantly lobbying governments for ever increasing tougher laws and draconian penalties for such liaisons: they will eventually get the sex they are so desperately missing and long for.
They aim to make all young attractive, nubile and fertile young women completely off limits to all men by branding all NORMAL male sexuality as paedophilia’. Thus all such normal men are soon to be defined (if not already) as sub-human paedophiles’ and they have already made much progress through their destructive yet very successful campaigning and propaganda, at convincing our society to believe and FEAR what they have now made into the dominant narrative. The dominant narrative that has all but totally destroyed our once functional and fearless society and which has already ruined and even destroyed, the lives of many thousands to millions of good and decent people. It MUST be stopped before it is too late.
FAIR WARNING: if you're a woman who has extremely thin skin please don't read any further: you WILL get offended. If you think you can handle what follows - then proceed at your own risk.
When you live like a whore by sharing your body with any and every guy that strikes your interest - don't get mad when you end up with the whore's reward! You asked for it!
The whore's reward consists of children out of wedlock, emotional trauma and instability, the inability to be with just one man long term, multi-penis syndrome, mental problems, and being highly undesirable for marriage.
What's multi-penis syndrome? That's when you find yourself wondering if the guy you just met has a penis large enough to fulfill your sexual desires. That's a whore's problem! Only whores worry about that kind of mess!
Because had you done things God's way your husband's penis would be the ONLY penis you've ever experienced! Owning dildos and sex toys are also symptoms of multi-penis syndrome.
A lot of women are right now suffering the consequences from living like outright whores during their younger years. They spurned Godly wise counsel from the scriptures, believing the Bible was old-fashioned and outdated. And did their own thing instead.
Now they are eating the fruits of what they've sown. And many are unhappy with the bitter taste. They can't get married, can't maintain a long term relationship leading to marriage, can't meet a quality guy, and only seem to hook up with men who want to use their bodies for semen target practice.
See, God didn't give me wisdom to help EVERY women out there. I don't know what the struggles of single Chinese migrant women are.
But He did give me wisdom to help a specific type of woman: the ones this post is referring to, who threw away their golden opportunities in their younger years and are now reaping the rewards for their poor choices later in life.
I can definitely help THOSE women because I know exactly what their problems are. I know precisely what's holding many of you back from getting married. The problem is that this is the most stubbornly obstinate group of women on the planet!
Though I can help them, many of them are so scared and jaded they prefer instead to sling insults and to fight, rendering helping them a virtual impossibility.
I'm at the point now where all the help I'm willing to give on this topic is found in my relationship ebook. And if you're not willing to read that, I'm not willing to do anything else for you. Just wallow in your own self-made misery like a pig rolling in its own slop.
Truth is: until you repent for living a whore's life, most of you who want to be married but aren't yet - never will be.
Doesn't matter how Christian, educated, smart, pretty, bougie, college degreed, sorority pledged or intelligent you think you are: there will always be a consequence for violating Godly principles. Especially as it relates to sex.
You cannot cheat or beat God's system! God's way works: always has and always will. God's system is His Kingdom. It's an eternal kingdom that predates humanity and Earth itself. We are not wiser or smarter than God is. This is why His way continues to prevail like a mountain, while everything else crumbles around it.
The cure is simple: humble yourselves. So many of you are yet still arrogant and unrepentant. I can see it in the comment streams on my page whenever I promote my relationship ebook for women.
Women who are chronically single will immediately flood the comment stream pretending they have the answers; when they obviously do not. They can't be humble enough to just quietly get the ebook. Instead they have to pretend like they know what to do: when apparently if they did its not even working for them.
Here's some more truth for you to digest: Many of you don't have as much time to get right as you might think. The older you get the less chances you'll have to be seen by single men as anyone worth getting married to.
Younger guys will only tend to want to have sex with you: including the ones you meet at church! And older guys think you're full of too much baggage to seriously bother with, so they're overlooking you for marriage in favor of the younger women.
You're in a precarious predicament if you truly want to get married some day. You really don't have the luxury of time on your side anymore.
There is a glimmer of hope in all of this - my ebook Saved Sexy And Still Single: Why Christian Women Can't Get Married Even Though They Love God. For many of you its your only ray of hope, and your absolute last chance. You should've read it first! Could've been married by now.
Get it, read it and be humble enough to let the Spirit of God use it to heal what's broken in your life. Link is in the comment section below.
Moral abandon, rape, foreign invasion, and the defeat and occupation of England by the Franco-German Union, complete with annual payments of tribute. What a stupid, evil woman. If the anti-suffragettes of the day had had even a modicum of a glimmer of a true understanding of what the price of women's suffrage would be for England, they would have executed the lot of them faster than the Chinese government's crackdown on democracy activists at Tianenman Square.
How appropriate that some of the suffragettes wore head scarves. Very forward-thinking indeed.
Small dick is the ultimate death sentence
You can be a deformed, ugly, autistic dwarf, but if you have at least normal penis size you still have a glimmer of hope. You can fuck cheap prostitutes and actually enjoy hardcore sex. But if you have small dick, nothing else is of any value... and I'm talking about real small ones, micropenises and those that are 4 inches or 3 inches long. If this is your destiny, you are fucked. You should be as good as dead. Because nothing will help you. You will never be taken seriously or actually pleasure woman in sex. You can't even jerk of normally, and if you pay a prostitute you will never fuck them in the real sense of the word. Even if you were Chad, really small dick is endgame for you. Yes, you can have the best body and looks, but girls will never treat you as a real man during sex, so you will have to adapt constantly, and even then it's just not what it should be. During blowjobs she can't marvel at your dick and truly enjoy it and let it dominate her. She can pretend, but you will know. Tbh the only thing that's worse than an incel is a Chad or a Normie with a small dick.
You can be a deformed, ugly, autistic dwarf, but if you have at least normal penis size you still have a glimmer of hopeno hope if you can't physically attract a foid
The Myth of Self-Improvement
The biggest, ultimate COPE practiced by practically everybody on the planet is the belief that they have control over their own biology. If only they try hard enough! Then, one day, someday, everything will change! A believe most people have on this sorry planet, yet we still see most people remain tremendously average. Because as much as they'd hate to admit it, their very conscious, their soul, is just as anchored to biology as their physical athleticism. And no matter how hard you train, you're never going to beat Usain Bolt. Nor are you going to become the next Albert Einstein or Bill Gates.
It is pretty obvious that some men will always be more athletic than others. And recent research indicates that other aspects of men are just as unchangeable. We do not know how to improve IQ through education alone. Most people who have significant weight loss will gain it all back. Even personality traits seem to be significantly genetic. But when we say that our ability to get laid is mostly set and stone, both Blues and Reds FREAK THE FUCK OUT. "Its your personality, you misogynist freak!" "Just lift, bro." "Don't you even know game?" They cannot stand biological determinism, because it represents a counter to everything they stand for. But as the least successful of men, we know that, no matter what we do, we cannot get laid to save our lives. And I mean this in a very literal sense.
The Blue Pill - The Hope
Honestly, I'm outright tired of addressing why The Blue Pill is wrong so many times, only for us to be strawmanned anyways. To put it simply, The Blue Pilled really do believe in a Just World Fallacy. Men who are friendly and fun get laid, men who are rude and, well, evil don't. That is the extend of their philosophical rigor. No explanation for the divorce epidemic, hybristophilia, celebrity obsession, ancestral sexual success, or harems. They just believe a nice guy can't be nice unless he regularly slays pussy. In fact, men who sexually succeed can't be assholes, because women want them. The real truth is somewhere in between, but Blue Pill refuses to admit women can be shallow at every turn.
Our "personality" is the least of our problems. If The Blue Pill "theory" that misogyny is the cause of our virginity, and not the other way around, then we would have seen some sexual success while we still drank the Kool-Aid. In fact, many of us were just as Blue Pilled as the current posters (I certainly know I was). Yet female interest never happened. Their "theory" holds no water.
That's all I'm willing to say no Blue Pill nonsense. The more important issue is what The Red Pill exposes. Does The Red Pill hold any more water?
The Red Pill - The Cope
Ostensibly, The Red Pill uses real, evolutionary psychology to attain sex from nubile, fertile females. And on paper, much of what they write makes sense. Females are interested in musculature. Therefore, you must lift weights. Females are interested in social dominance. Therefore, you must pass shit tests, maintain frame, and acquire value. However, there is a world's difference from recognizing these attributes and being able to attain them yourself.
Men are both with a predisposition to certain personality traits. Some men have more testosterone and other hormones/enzymes to ward off fat and attain muscle mass. Kids don't exactly lift, but that doesn't change the fact we can tell who the jocks are by Junior High. A jock who has a dry spell can use this information to maximize his already top tier genes. A nerd or an Incel will find far fewer success.
Even if it is technically possible for a normie to become a muscle God, most normies lack the biological willpower to achieve the results. The "Alphas" of TRP CONSTANTLY praise the life changing effects of lifting. It will boost your confidence, make you slay pussy, and most importaly, make you feel like a GOD. Well, sorry, if lifting was actually the soul-cleansing activity TRP says it was, people would actually fucking do it. "Don't lift for pussy, do it for yourself!" is an absolute excuse for the back-breaking labor men do in their desperate attempt to get female sexual validation. If -people were sexually attracted to fatsos, every gym on the planet would look like a ghost town. Even when I tried to lift weights, I NEVER enjoyed it beyond the brief testosterone pulse afterwards. Yet, if I brought up this fact to a TRPer, they would be angrier than if I said I was going to rape their son. It is a cult to them, and they will not take any excuse for you to not join their religion. Apparently, you must do it for yourself, whenever you want to or not.
And what are the actual, on the field results behind the constant Alpha posturing? Well, as far as I know, no scientific study has been performed to measure the success of PUA/Red Pill philosophy. However, I will point out that, despite painting it like a miracle drug, one of the core tenants of The Red Pill is to expect constant failure in approaches
Some tidbits of Alphaness:
Buddy had a 3% rule... He'd go up to a girl, say," Nice shoes. Wanna fuck?" He got slapped a lot. But also got laid a lot too. There is no lose. You win or you learn.
Tinder I have around 200 matches(3 1/2 months) and Ive banged 11
Out of the 160 openers, I have a 5.00% success rate in landing a date. And out of the 160 openers, I got laid 3.13% of the time
You're looking at about 3% (sex) for a daygame cold approach.
I asked out over 200 women. In the end, I got 60 numbers, 2 dates, and 0 lays.
You will never see this be advertised by whatever posturing douchebag, trying to peddle his advice to ugly, impressionable men. Even with all of the self-improvement in the world, your chances still remain in the low single digits. Its almost like self-improvement and game aren't particularly effective!
I'd like to believe that Red Pill Knowledge has at least SOME effect, but it seems rather clear that not only is there no evidence TRP will make you a pussy slayer.
The Black Pill - The Rope
The ultimate conclusion one has to make is that most females look at the same type of attractive man, that is largely determined by biological factors. Lifting will not change your face. Game won't remove your autism. And concepts like abundance mentality and dread game are impossible to achieve unless you're already sexually and financially successful. You can't have abundance when you fail 97 tries out of 100, or are a kissless, hugless, romanceless virgin. Nothing you read on the web is going to make you wealthy, and for as many ventures that succeed, many more will fail.
The Black Pill is the ultimate representation of reality. Most pussy slayers have never even heard of The Red Pill or Game. Yet they still slay pussy. This is because they were born as Chad Thundercock, not made.
As Incels, the moment we reached out-of-college age without losing our V-cards, all hope is lost. Maybe if we become rich we'll get laid. MAYBE. But there is no point in dedicating our lives to the gym nor haranging every single female we need in "Day Game". We are virgins because we are unattractive: nothing but a miracle will change that.
IMO, seeing that adult trash what they do with our youth, I think anyone who dating an adult rather than a young deserves only jail and beaten to death!
if someone prefers to engage with a bitter and sadist legal adult and not with a hot funny nubile young that guy is just a human waste!! adultophilia is a sexual aberration, a clinical disorder, is only for irrational animals, hebephilia is the natural sexuality to all sane humans, fuck off with tolerance!!
[Comment under "Edwin Walker: Ruined By Oswald"]
It’s worth noting that the only person to serve two terms in Eisenhower’s cabinet, Ezra Taft Benson, believed Welch was correct and urged everyone to join the John Birch Society. They were right then, and they are right today.
On June 26, 2015 the Godless U.S. Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriages are now legal in all 50 states. It is wickedness! It is a sad day in America! Proverb 29:2, “When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.” The truth is that most Americans are against same-sex unions, but heathen Freemasons, liberals and Communists have taken over our country, demoralizing our youth in an attempt to turn our land into a secular state completely devoid of God. This is necessary for the New World Order to succeed, because Christianity is the biggest enemy of evil. (And may I say, there is no such thing as a “homosexual marriage” in God's eyes, because two people of the same sex cannot consumate a marriage as male and female.) Homosexuality is a filthy abomination in the sight of God!!!
Born-again Christians are in a difficult position today in America. The more that our American culture deteriorates into wickedness and Godlessness, the greater the contrast between the wicked and the righteous. One of our text verses from Proverbs 29:27 teaches that the contention between the unjust and the just (i.e., the wicked and the righteous) is permanent. The apostate churches today that are approving same-sex marriages are wicked in God's eyes. The Bible says that the wicked are an abomination to the just. Religious people who accept the homosexual community are unrighteous themselves!!!
2nd Corinthians 6:14, “Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?” No Christian ought to ever sanction a same-sex marriage. It is evil. The Bible calls homosexuals “Sodomites,” linking the sin of homosexuality to the destruction which came upon Sodom and Gomorrah. Genesis 13:13, “But the men of Sodom were wicked and sinners before the LORD exceedingly.” Genesis 19:24, “Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven.” 1st Kings 14:24, “And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel.” Since two men cannot mate in normal fashion as a male and female, they have to SODOMIZE each other!!! Sodomy is truly a very risky perverted deathstyle that has been medically documented. ...
Gay’ Doctor, Stephen Goldstone: Anal Sex Like a Battering Ram’ for which Your Sphincter Is No Match’
Americans For Truth About Homosexuality
Monday, January 20th, 2014
Can you handle the truth about homo-sex? Most people can’t, because it is brutal (literally) and repulsive. Here is a quotation from Dr. Stephen Goldstone, an open homosexual and author of The Ins and Outs of Gay Sex. Dr. Goldstone is an Assistant Clinical Professor of Surgery at The Mount Sinai School of Medicine and an expert on “gay men’s health” and “anorectal disorders,” according to the (“gay”-affirming) Physicians Research Network [see their bio of Goldstone HERE]. This item is reprinted from 1999 issue of Lambda Report, the print predecessor to Americans For Truth.
As I wrote back then, “keep in mind that Goldstone is a sex positive’ homosexuality advocate who dedicates his book to his [male] lover, Bruce.” Also, it seems obvious but it needs to be said: anal sex is also high-risk if practiced by heterosexuals [see this British web article and this interesting piece, "Women Are Having Anal Sex for All the Wrong Reasons"]. Tragically, pornography is helping to “mainstream” this destructive vice which in saner times was described (by English jurist William Blackstone) as the “infamous crime against nature” and “a subject the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature.” Peter LaBarbera, AFTAH
READ MORE FOR UGLY TRUTH: http://americansfortruth.com/issues/gay-sex-health-risks/
In December of 1999 at Saint Elizabeth's Hospital in Chicago, I had my appendix removed. The surgeon made an incision about 4 inches long on my abdomen's right side. He performed a complex appendectomy, because he said my appendix was inverted and he couldn't find it when he cut into me. All of my blood vessels in my eyes had broken from the severe vomiting in the days before I knew what was wrong with my body. For 21 days (that's how long it took) the white area of my eyes were all red. My eyes looked really scary to say the least, with no white at all. For about 7-years I couldn't feel my nerves where the incision had been made. Touching the scar was like touching the table in front of me, no sensation at all. The nerves healed themselves (God is so amazing!), but it took about 7-years. So if you ever get surgery, your feeling where the surgery is done will come back, but it takes many years.
Anyway, the reason I am bringing this matter up is because the day after my surgery, the surgeon came to my hospital room to see how I was doing. We began talking and he shared with me a story about one of his patients, in which a homosexual's partner rammed a dildo so hard in his anus that he tore his intestines. The surgeon said that the homosexual man will have to wait about one month to get surgery, because they have to remove all the fecal matter from his intestinal area due to contamination before they can safely do the surgery. This is the type of horror stories that the homosexual community will never tell you... THE UGLY TRUTH!!! Homosexuals have no choice but to sodomize each other, which even the beasts of the field don't do to each other! And they call this LOVE? No my friend, it is sick perversion! Homosexuality is a choice, a sinful choice!
Truthfully, homosexuality is a filthy vile sin! Jude 1:7, “Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.” God hates sin, all sin! God hates the perverted homosexual deathstyle, and so do I, and so should every born-again Christian who loves the Lord. Psalms 97:10, “Ye that love the LORD, hate evil: he preserveth the souls of his saints; he delivereth them out of the hand of the wicked.” Homosexuals, leftists and liberals are having a heyday right now since the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex perversion.
In reality, the legalization of same-sex unions is nothing surprising for Christians, because we knew this would happen since 1963 when the U.S. Supreme Court banned God's Holy Bible and prayer from America's classrooms. Pedophilia is the next big trend coming to America. The fact of the matter is that sexual perverts are sexual perverts! We are already seeing the sexual exploitation of underaged girls in Dance Moms, music videos, Hollywood. It's only going to get much worse. The Godless social media, VH1, teen magazine, Walt Disney, television networks and Hollywood are going to keep pushing the moral boundaries toward the shocking, unthinkable, Satanic, taboo and freakish. Ah, but God is still on His throne!!! Let the heathen rage! Job 20:5, “That the triumphing of the wicked is short, and the joy of the hypocrite but for a moment? Psalms 37:13, “ The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming.” There is no true lasting victory for godless sinners! Isaiah 57:21, “There is no peace, saith my God, to the wicked.”
Older, established men were meant to marry young, nubile women and make babies with them. When those men croak, they leave their worldly goods to their now-middle-aged wives who now, after baby-having and kid-raising, can reach orgasm and so pork the randy young males who haven't established themselves yet. When those women croak, those boys are now older, established men ready to marry young, nubile women and make babies with them.
Not many young women can attain orgasm during sex. They're not supposed to. Sex for a woman during the childbearing years is about having babies. Men, on the other hand, have no problem attaining orgasm early on. They need training in what's good and what's not, and they should get it from older women who now can enjoy sex and can show them the ropes. Then, when those men marry, they can show their nubile young wives the ropes.
Nazism & Gay Rights: Key Parallels
In 1939, a young German exile wrote a book about how the Nazis took over his country. The manuscript was placed in a drawer and forgotten until his death 60 years later, when it was found by his son and became a best-seller under the title Defying Hitler.
It was an amazing discovery because the author, Sebastian Haffner, had by then grown into one of Germany's most popular journalists. The narrative is also a gem of social commentary, showing how historical circumstance, political inertia and moral cowardice combined to produce one of humanity's greatest disasters. This article will follow his work, using Haffner's insights as a roadmap for the rise of homofascism in the United States. There are at least seven key parallels between the two eras.
1) The first similarity between our current times and Germany in the 1930s is an agenda-driven use of the media. Propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels had a dark genius for supporting films, radio programs, books and newspapers favorable to the Nazi cause. He also was a master at making Hitler's support look larger than life, scheduling him to speak in small venues that would result in dense crowds. The pro-gay forces have done the same thing in the United States by quietly promoting sodomy in countless movies and television shows for the last 2030 years (Philadelphia, Will & Grace, Brokeback Mountain, to name a few). Like the Nazis, modern gays have overrepresented the size and popular support of their subculture.
2) Hitler and the homofascists also benefited from a collapse of opposition to their evil. Haffner describes this situation in March 1933, when the Third Reich came into being:
There was a League of Communist Front-Line Veterans and a centrist association called Reischbanner with a black, red and gold flag, the colors of the Weimar Republic. It was organized on military lines by a coalition of parties including the Social Democrats, had arms and millions of members, and was explicitly intended to hold the SA (Nazis) in check. During the whole period this association remained completely invisible, not a glimmer. It disappeared without a trace, as though it had never existed .
The officers of the Reischbanner showed not the slightest opposition when their facilities were taken over by the SA. The Stahlhelm, the army of German nationalists, permitted itself to be absorbed and then dissolved, bit by bit. They grumbled but offered no resistance. There was not one single example of energetic defense, of courage or principle. There was only panic, flight and desertion. In March 1933 millions were ready to fight the Nazis. Overnight they found themselves without leaders... .
This terrible moral bankruptcy of the opposition leadership is a fundamental characteristic of the March "revolution" of 1933. It made the Nazi victory exceedingly easy. (pp. 13233)
Replace these Germans with Americans like Indiana governor Mike Pence, Washington archbishop Cardinal Wuerl, New York archbishop cardinal Egan, or Knights of Columbus supreme knight Carl Anderson. Our leaders have also been missing in action on issue after issue divorce, contraception, abortion, civil unions, same-sex marriage making the victory of evil in this country exceedingly easy as well. Their cowardice was even worse because Nazis had guns and killed people, while our leaders retreated without even a whiff of physical danger.
3) Another similarity between the German fascists and homofascists is restriction on speech to hide the nature of their evil. This passage is relevant to our times:
While they [Nazis] were systematically torturing and murdering their defenseless victims, they daily declared in fine, noble words that not a single hair on anyone's head would be harmed. Indeed, only a few weeks after the atrocities began, a law was passed that forbade anyone, under pain of several penalties, to claim, even in the privacy of his own home, that atrocities were taking place. (p. 127)
Of course, homofascists seldom use violence in our times. But they're quick to destroy a person's career or reputation. And they're perfectly willing to use laws to restrict criticism as hate speech. They also want to ban conversion therapy, keeping individuals from receiving treatment for same-sex attraction. Just like the Nazis, today's homosexualists want to shut down opposition speech.
4) The forces of sodomy resemble their anti-semitic cousins in the ability of a small, well-organized minority to control a malleable but disorganized majority. The Nazi party, after all, never won more than 40 percent of the national vote in Germany. In this way it resembles gay marriage, which has become the law of our land despite losing referendum after referendum. Knowing they cannot win in honest debates, they advance their agenda using any means necessary.
5) There's also a peculiar combination of rule-breaking with normalcy. In Germany, for instance, Nazi street violence was explained away as "revolutionary excess" but occurred with the blessing of the state. As Haffner says:
[The Nazis] acted from a position of complete security, under orders and with strict discipline. The external picture was one of revolutionary terror: a wild unkempt mob breaking into homes at night and dragging defenseless victims to the torture chambers. The internal process was repressive terror: cold, calculated, offical orders, directed by the state and carried out under the full protection of the police and the armed forces. ... [W]hat happened was a nightmarish reversal of normal circumstances: robbers and murderers acting as the police force, enjoying the full panoply of state power, their victims treated as criminals, proscribed and condemned to death in advance. (pp. 12526)
Killing defenseless people was technically a crime in Germany, just as sodomy once was illegal in most of the United States. But violators of the law went unpunished over time, and soon the criminals ran the country.
Meanwhile, innocent people are attacked as if they were felons. In Germany, they were Jews and opposition leaders like the Social Democrats. Today, they're bakers, florists and owners of bed-and-breakfasts.
And, just as street thugs became the new law and order in Nazi Germany, we have pedophiles in the United States writing sex ed curricula and gay judges like Elena Kagan and Vaughn Walker ruling on marriage cases.
6) It's also interesting that homosexuals continue their pride marches after gaining acceptance. This resembles the Nazis, who marched with uniforms, flags and torches well after 1933. In both cases, the demonstrations serve to intimidate opposition and to rally their own numbers. They're totally different from protests to achieve a specific outcome, like ending segregation, war or abortion.
A-rabs (and Muzzies) use words the way liberals do -- to scare fraidy cats, to intimidate little kids and old women, to make nubile girls tremble so that boobies shake inside burkhas and pee runs down shapely thighs and calves. It's all displaced sex.
You can't tell, ever, what an A-rab (or Muzzie) thinks by what he says or even how he says it. He'll talk shit and sound real tough, just before he breaks down in tears and crawls on his knees to you, begging for mercy.
If you ever get a gf and want to keep her
Of course, looks are important to get a gf in the first place, but let's assume you get a gf and want to keep her. what would you do? you should beat her, abuse her. that's the way.
I swear almost everyone with a gf/wife around me is hostile towards their women. I even know some women getting beaten by their husbands and say "its ok he is my husband" that's how you should act.
Ok maybe not beat the shit out of her but you should put pressure on her if you're a cuck who brings flowers everyday YOU'LL GET CUCKED. You should keep her under check and slap her if needed
That's what I see around me, if you being a 'romantic" cuck guaranteed you'll get cucked lol you need to be abusive. That's what I'll do if i get a gf
a oldcel told me once that if i want to keep women under check i should beat them and be abusive.
And he is not wrong, believe it or not fellas thats THE WAY and keep that in your mind if you ever get a gf, and no I'm not saying it from a personal experience cuz i never had a gf but thats what I see around me and I can guarantee that is real. even women who nearly killed by their husbands/boyfriends says " its ok he is my man"
[It's Over] Fasting to death is better than roping or blowing your brains out.
Go back hundreds of thousands of years, when every femoid reproduced and only one out of seventeen men reproduced, when sixteen out of seventeen men either spent their lives hunting and gathering to feed cave chad, his harem, and his offspring while being bullied, intimidated, and killed in the heartless bloodbath of sexual competition and the only other option was to wander the earth alone until you die... These cavecels didn't have ropes, you could eat some poison berries or poison plant, you could force a venomous snake to bite you, maybe a few were smart enough to slash their wrists with obsidian but I doubt it, and if you knew where a high cliff was there was that option.
So how does a non chad man perform the art of suicide where there is no high cliffs? How does he set himself free if he lacks the knowledge of rope making or poison plants? What if he's not smart enough to slash his wrist? How do animals perform suicide? I remember when my dog was terminally ill and it knew that there was no pint in suffering a meaningless existence, it stopped eating and hid in under a table with it's face in the corner. We had to take it to the vet and shoot it up with the pink juice. Animals know that starvation can kill them. Starvation must therefore be, the primordial incel suicide method. It requires nothing, you don't need anything to do it.
If you choose to die by starvation alone, without dehydrating yourself, it can be painless and euphoric... it just takes awhile... If you start with less than ten percent body fat, you end it in a month. In India it's ritualized and often involves a slow gradual reduction of food over a period of several months to several years until they choose to stop eating completely and barely drink water, some abandoning water when they feel death is near to hasten the process.
In Hinduism this is called Prayopavesa:
Prayopavesa (Sanskrit: प्रायोपवेशनम्, literally resolving to die through fasting) is a practice in Hinduism that denotes the suicide by fasting of a person, who has no desire or ambition left, and no responsibilities remaining in life . Committing Prayopavesa is bound by very strict regulations. Only a person who has no desire or ambition left, and no responsibilities remaining in life is entitled to perform it . The decision to do so must be publicly declared well in advance. Ancient lawmakers stipulated the conditions that allow Prayopavesa. They are one's inability to perform normal bodily purification, death appears imminent or the condition is so bad that life's pleasures are nil and the action is done under community regulation.
As you can see, prayopavesa is taking LDAR to the extreme, it is the ultimate LDAR. Fuck community regulation, everyone is bluepilled and cucked in current times.
In Jainism it is called Sallekhana:
Sallekhana , also known as samlehna, santhara, samadhi-marana or sanyasana-marana, is a supplementary vow to the ethical code of conduct of Jainism. It is the religious practice of voluntarily fasting to death by gradually reducing the intake of food and liquids. It is viewed in Jainism as the thinning of human passions and the body, and another means of destroying rebirth-influencing karma by withdrawing all physical and mental activities. It is not considered as a suicide by Jain scholars because it is not an act of passion, nor does it deploy poisons or weapons. After the sallekhana vow, the ritual preparation and practice can extend into years.
Sallekhana (Sanskrit: Sallikhita) means to properly 'thin out', 'scour out' or 'slender' the passions and the body through gradually abstaining from food and drink. Sallekhana is divided into two components: Kashaya Sallekhana (slenderising of passions) or Abhayantra Sallekhana (internal slendering) and Kaya Sallekhana (slenderising the body) or Bahya Sallekhana(external slendering). According to Jain texts, Sallekhana leads to Ahimsa (non-violence or non-injury), as a person observing Sallekhana subjugates the passions, which are the root cause of Himsa (injury or violence).
It's also practiced in Buddhism as well:
image(2nd century B.C.E statue of a Neckbeard Buddha embracing death by LDAR)
image(Look at this chad with his shades on...)
Sokushinbutsu (即身仏) are a kind of Buddhist mummy. The term refers to the practice of Buddhist monks observing asceticism to the point of death and entering mummification while alive.They are seen in a number of Buddhist countries, but the Japanese term "sokushinbutsu" is generally used. It is believed that many hundreds of monks tried, but only 24 such mummifications have been discovered to date. There is a common suggestion that Shingon school founder Kukai brought this practice from Tang China as part of secret tantric practices he learned, and that were later lost in China. According to Paul Williams, the Sokushinbutsu ascetic practices of Shugendō were likely inspired by Kūkai – the founder of Shingon Buddhism, who ended his life by reducing and then stopping intake of food and water, while continuing to meditate and chant Buddhist mantras. Ascetic self-mummification practices are also recorded in China, but are associated with the Ch'an(Zen Buddhism) tradition there.
In medieval Japan, this tradition developed a process for Sokushinbutsu, which a monk completed over about 3,000 days to ten years. It involved a strict diet called mokujikigyo (literally, "eating a tree"). The diet abstained from any cereals, and relied on pine needles, resins and seeds found in the mountains, which would eliminate all fat in the body. Increasing rates of fasting and meditation would lead to starvation. The monks would slowly reduce then stop liquid intake, thus dehydrating the body and shrinking all organs. The monks would die in a state of jhana (meditation) while chanting the nenbutsu (a mantra about Buddha), and their body would become naturally preserved as a mummy with skin and teeth intact without decay and without the need of any artificial preservatives.
It was discussed by Hegesias of Cyrene:
Hegesias (Greek: Ἡγησίας; fl. 290 BC) of Cyrene was a Cyrenaic philosopher, the Cyrenaics forming one of the earliest Socratic schools of philosophy. He argued that happiness is impossible to achieve, and that the goal of life was the avoidance of pain and sorrow. Conventional values such as wealth, poverty, freedom, and slavery are all indifferent and produce no more pleasure than pain. Cicero claims that Hegesias wrote a book called Death by Starvation, which persuaded so many people that death is more desirable than life that Hegesias was banned from teaching in Alexandria. It has been thought by some that Hegesias was influenced by Buddhist teachings.
Hegesias followed Aristippus in considering pleasure as the goal of life; but, the view which he took of human life was more pessimistic. Happiness, he said, could not be the goal of life, because it is not attainable, and therefore concluded that the wise person's only goal should be to become free from pain and sorrow. Since, too, every person is self-sufficient, all external goods were rejected as not being true sources of pleasure.
Complete happiness cannot possibly exist; for that the body is full of many sensations, and that the mind sympathizes with the body, and is troubled when that is troubled, and also that fortune prevents many things which we cherished in anticipation; so that for all these reasons, perfect happiness eludes our grasp. Moreover, that both life and death are desirable. They also say that there is nothing naturally pleasant or unpleasant, but that owing to want, or rarity, or satiety, some people are pleased and some vexed; and that wealth and poverty have no influence at all on pleasure, for that rich people are not affected by pleasure in a different manner from poor people. In the same way they say that slavery and freedom are things indifferent, if measured by the standard of pleasure, and nobility and baseness of birth, and glory and infamy. They add that, for the foolish person it is expedient to live, but to the wise person it is a matter of indifference; and that the wise person will do everything for his own sake; for that he will not consider any one else of equal importance with himself; and he will see that if he were to obtain ever such great advantages from any one else, they would not be equal to what he could himself bestow.
Hence the sage ought to regard nothing but himself; action is quite indifferent; and if action, so also is life, which, therefore, is in no way more desirable than death.
The wise person would not be so much absorbed in the pursuit of what is good, as in the attempt to avoid what is bad, considering the chief good to be living free from all trouble and pain: and that this end was attained best by those who looked upon the efficient causes of pleasure as indifferent.
None of this, however, is as strong as the testimony of Cicero, who claims that Hegesias wrote a book called Death by Starvation (Greek: ἀποκαρτερῶν), in which a man who has resolved to starve himself is introduced as representing to his friends that death is actually more to be desired than life, and that the gloomy descriptions of human misery which this work contained were so overpowering that they inspired many people to kill themselves, in consequence of which the author received the surname of Death-persuader (Peisithanatos). This book was published at Alexandria, where he was, in consequence, forbidden to teach by king Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285-246 BC).
A wristcel refers to someone whose romantic overtures constantly result in nonredamancy due to having thin wrists. Noncels tend to laught at wristcels and incelospherians considering a hyperfocus on one's wrist size to be stupid. However, when you analyze eye-tracking technology, women do tend to notice the width of a man's arms. Which doesn't equate to wrists being involved in general attraction.
image”when you’re pissed but know you can't do anything about it bc youlre a 5′2″ and got small hands”)
Note that being a wristcel is the second-to-worst thing aside from being a neckcel, as both indicate that no amount of muscle mass will free you from being a framelet.
On a recent episode of his “Pray In Jesus Name” program, religious right activist and former Colorado state legislator Gordon Klingenschmitt and his guest, right-wing journalist Alex Newman, agreed that teaching students about LGBTQ history should be illegal.
Klingenschmitt was outraged that Colorado recently enacted legislation requiring public schools to adopt LGBTQ-friendly curriculum, claiming that it will result in teachers delivering “mandatory homosexual lectures to children.”
“They’re redefining all of the textbooks,” he said. “It doesn’t make sense. Years ago, this would be pedophiles recruiting and grooming children for their own perverse pleasure down the road. Why don’t we see this as an illegal measure of recruiting children into sodomy?”
“That is exactly how we should see it,” replied Newman, who is a regular contributor to the John Birch Society magazine, The New American. “Years ago, these people would have gone to prison for this sort of stuff, exposing children to obscene material, grooming children, exposing them to sexual and indecent material. That’s a crime.”
“The government schools all across America are still exposing the children to this stuff,” he continued. “It’s getting more and more obscene. And I think, quite simply, they have accomplished a radical transformation of the culture using the government school system with kind of air support from the far-left media, and from Hollyweird; the Satanic propaganda, the filth, the LGBT agenda that comes out of all of these places.”
“We can already start to see what is happening,” Newman added. “The breakdown of the family, skyrocketing abortion numbers, school shootings, the collapse of our society … It is an abomination. It is a tragedy of immense proportions and, honestly, I don’t think our society is going to survive another generation or two of this.”
My words have been justified a thousandfold by the actions of the AAPS, this time around, it’s giving Andrew Wakefield the Featured Article position in its latest issue of JPANDS. The article? It’s called The Sixth Extinction: Vaccine Immunity and Measles Mutants in a Virgin Soil, and in it Wakefield argues that we’re heading for a sixth extinction because of—you guessed it!—vaccines.
Before I get to Wakefield’s magnum opus of antivaccine fear mongering, let’s review a bit of background for those not familiar with AAPS and its official journal JPANDS. The first time I wrote about AAPS and JPANDS was over 13 years ago. In that post, I described AAPS as the John Birch Society for physicians, given its far right-wing tilt. More recently, I like to refer to AAPS as a right wing crank organization disguised as a medical professional society, given how assiduously AAPS likes to don the trappings of a society like the American Medical Association, the better to use the medical profession to give the appearance of scientific legitimacy to its views.
This brings us back to Andrew Wakefield. In many ways, Wakefield is a perfect fit for AAPS and for the lead article in JPANDS. He “doesn’t follow the herd” (unless it’s a herd of antivaxers) but does bucks the system (albeit in a horrible way). He rejects evidence- and science-based medicine if they don’t conclude what he believes and thereby reinforce his beliefs. He possesses an ego as inflated as that of the fictional Dr. Hendricks, feels completely unappreciated because the medical profession rejects his pseudoscience and scientific fraud. He doesn’t believe that he as a physician—a no longer licensed physician, I hasten to add, his having had his license stripped from him by the UK—should have to bow to any medical authority or science- and evidence-based guidelines, and his narcissism is knows no bounds. You get the idea. So naturally, AAPS would see Wakefield as a perfect contributor to its house organ JPANDS. I’m only surprised that it hasn’t happened before, as far as I can remember. (I’m not going through JPANDS back issues to see if he’s contributed before.)
I also can’t help but be surprised at what Wakefield has written in JPANDS for AAPS. Wakefield has always assiduously tried to deny and avoid the label of “antivax.” Yet, here, he goes further off the deep end of antivaccine pseudoscience, general medical pseudoscience, and conspiracy mongering than I’ve ever seen him go before. In this article, Wakefield manages to be a denialist not only of vaccines, but he also flirts with evolution denial (or at least an incredibly poor understanding of evolution), and even sidles up to germ theory denialism. To set the stage, he starts with Louis Pasteur (of course!), proceeds to evolution, where he misrepresents a lot of science. Naturally, AAPS and JPANDS, being AAPS and JPANDS, the editors and ludicrous “peer reviewers” let it all pass without questioning.
Wakefield begins by decrying how Pasteur framed his germ theory, which is not entirely unreasonable, given how much of our microbiological flora are either beneficial or neutral, something that wasn’t understood in the late 19th century. It doesn’t take long for Wakefield’s complaint to go from semi-reasonable to ludicrous as he abuses science more and more in the article.
From here Wakefield proceeds to the Sir Alexander Fleming, penicillin, and the antibiotic era, making the observation that bacterial resistance has evolved as a result of overuse of antibiotics. At this point, it becomes quite obvious where Wakefield is going with this:
Are vaccines destined for a similar fate? It’s a very interesting question. One answer is, why not? For vaccines, resistance equates to strains of the microbe, the virus, or the bacteria that can elude the imperfect immunity created by the vaccine.
From here on out, Wakefield goes pretty much whole crank, totally off the deep end, listing the “greatest hits” of antivaccine conspiracy theories, including the Simpsonwood conference, thimerosal, and the like, and then, in a feat of projection that only an antivaxer could pull off, accuses scientists of being “too certain”:
Of course, Wakefield buys into the “autism epidemic” distortion, including ridiculous claims that autism prevalence will be 100% before too long, even saying that we are “approaching a situation in which everyone either has autism or is caring for someone with autism.” To him, this is a potential extinction-level event:
[Blackpill] Advice for high school cels: College is all about losing your virinigtiy
Basically if you are not a virgin there is no reason to go to college
Colleges are just accredited night clubs where girls are admitted for free while men have to pay a huge admission fee (every woman gets some sort of scholarship that covers all of her tuition and living costs for 4 years)
Youre paying tens of thousands for the privilege of potentially having sex with a young female. The price is high because this is really your last chance, once you start working 8 hours a day its over, say bye bye to ever meeting a young nubile female and making her your gf post college
One more thing to consider is your schools gender ratio.
When I was applying to unis I actually got a couple decent offers but I rejected them all so I could attend a more expensive school that had a 50-50 gender ratio
Now even if your school has a 50-50 ratio from stalking girls who go to my uni on social media they will all date guys off campus rather than settling for an on campus incel peer so yeah, I shouldve aimed for like a 75-25 female to male ratio
Also, Chads attend for free too because they all get sports scholarships, so if Chads feel like having more sex with women they can do it for free, your tuition pays for free university provided birth control JFL
ILYA EHRENBERG – THE MAN WHO INVENTED THE ‘SIX MILLION’
But Ehrenburg was perhaps most notorious for his viciously anti-German hate propaganda in World War II. In it, he exhorted Soviet troops to kill all Germans they encountered without pity.
In one leaflet entitled “Kill,” Ehrenburg incited the simple Russian soldier to treat the Germans as subhuman. The final paragraph concludes:
“The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime … If you have already killed a German, then kill another one — there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! … — Kill the Germans! Kill!”
And in another leaflet: “The Germans must be killed. One must kill them … Do you feel sick? Do you feel a nightmare in your breast? … Kill a German! If you are a righteous an conscientious man — kill a German! … Kill!”
This is typical of the steady diet of pathological hate fed to millions of Soviet troops by this Jew, safely ensconced far from the front.
Ehrenburg in the 1960’s, living out his life NOT as a war criminal, but as a hero is Israel.
But it wasn’t only the ordinary German soldier Ehrenburg was talking about, whom he accused of the very atrocities the Communists were themselves committing. Ehrenburg’s incendiary writings were, in fact, a prime motivating factor in the orgy of murder and rape against the civilian population that took place as Soviet troops rampaged into the heart of Europe. Appealing to the lowest, most subhuman instincts of this Bolshevik horde, he reiterated his genocidal message:
“Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army.”
The crowning achievement of Ehrenburg’s career came on December 17, 1944, when this hate-crazed fiend became the first person to mention the kabbalistic figure of Six Million alleged Jewish victims of National Socialism, and then proceeded to introduce that figure into Soviet propaganda.
After the war he joined with co-racial and fellow propagandist Vasily (Iosif Solomonovich) Grossman to produce a fictitious “Black Book” and lay the foundation for what has come to be known as “The Holocaust.” The rest is history.
Ehrenburg never forgot his Jewish roots, and before his death he arranged for the transfer of his private archives to the tribal cult center at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem.
And so, it is altogether fitting that the birthday of this psychopathic lie-master should have been chosen as a day on which to remember the hoax which he concocted and of which he was the original inventor.
What was the result of this hateful propaganda?
Between the months of April and May, the German capital Berlin saw more than 100,000 rape cases according to hospital reports, while East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia saw more than 1.4 million rape cases.
Between the months of January and August of 1945, Germany saw the largest incident of mass rape known in history, where an estimated two million German women were raped by the Soviet Red Army soldiers, as written by Walter Zapotoczny Jr. in his book, ‘Beyond Duty: The Reason Some Soldiers Commit Atrocities’.
Hospital reports also stated that abortion operations were being carried out daily across all German hospitals.
Natalya Gesse, who was a Soviet war correspondent at the time, said that the Soviets didn’t care about the ages of their victims. “The Russian soldiers were raping every German female from eight to eighty. It was an army of rapists,” she said.
This caused the deaths of no less than 200,000 girls and women due to the spread of diseases, especially that many eyewitnesses recounted victims being raped as much as 70 times in that period.
Red Army soldiers would mass rape German women as a kind of revenge against their enemy: The German army. They felt that it was their earned right to do so as the German army had ‘violated’ their motherland by invading it. In addition to not being in contact with women for long periods causing their animal instinct to be heightened.
In his book, Zapotoczny said that even female Russian soldiers did not disapprove of the rapes, some finding it amusing.
“Our fellows were so sex-starved,” a Soviet major told a British journalist at the time, “that they often raped old women of sixty, seventy or even eighty – much to these grandmothers’ surprise, if not downright delight.”
In 1948, rape cases decreased vastly after Soviet troops were ordered back to their camps in Russia and left residential areas in Germany.
Here is the original article by Ilya Ehrenburg called “To Remember” from Pravda, December 17, 1944:
Die Pommersche Zeitung writes “Our struggle was honest from the very beginning; we did not cross our borders in blind madness intending to subjugate other nations. On the contrary, needing to leave our borders behind us, we went as the messengers for a new order and a new justice. Not one German ever dreamed of annihilating Englishmen or punishing Frenchmen or enslaving the Dutch or any other peoples, in order to live by the blood and sweat of other nations. On the contrary, our victories emitted tranquility.”
Poor dears, apparently they were forced to go to the Caucasus and to Egypt in order to emit tranquility and now when they were allowed to return to Cologne and to Eastern Prussia, they meekly say “whoever we hurt, we don’t hold it against them.”
What were their intentions when they crossed their borders? This question can be answered by the maps they published between 1939 and 1942. This is an atlas of “blind madness:” “Greater Germany” included Lille and Kiev, Riga and Nancy.
They did not want to enslave other nations and live by others’ blood and sweat? Not long ago didn’t Grupenfuhrer Gasse declare to the newspaper Hamburger Fren den blatt: “The former Russia will be colonized by Stormtroopers and their childen”? And the Danzigger Fortpost was estimating “Every German colonizer will be served by eight to ten families.” Yes, at that time they were not overly modest. And the German firm Bremen was promising stockholders cotton from Turkmenistan. At that time they declared that “a nation of merchants, Englishmen, do not deserve a place on Earth.” (Felkisher Beobachter) At that time they were threatening: “Shooting hostages will show the French that nothing will stop us.” (Parizer Tzeitung) Shipping off the Dutch to the Ukraine, they declared “Only history books will remember Holland as a state.” (Antriff)
Where did they “emit tranquility”? In the “desert zone” or perhaps stoking the ovens of Majdanek or Treblinka?
Isn’t it too early for them to renounce themselves? They are still shooting and already starting to whimper. They are still tearing children’s bodies apart and already starting to wash their bloodied hands.
We have a saying “To remember is to live.” Indeed, a man who loses his memory loses half his life and starts to fade away. But to remember means not only to live, it also means to save a life, to save future generations, to preserve the idea of what it means to be human.
There occur historical events which confound wise men. Hitler’s Germany is not a sphinx. It is typhus-bearing lice. Now everyone understands what fascism is but not everyone wants to remember what they understood. To forget means to forgive. And to forgive the stokers of Majdanek means to bring up children for even more efficient future ovens. I am not a politician but in my work I deal with human feelings because every writer is a psychologist. Every writer is also a moralist even if he does not think about morality. As a writer I want to remind you about the sources of fascism.
For many years the Nazis brainwashed German youth. What were they conveying to the little fascists? A feeling of superiority. Now the world knows what racial or national arrogance means. If every nation decided that they are first in the world and therefore have the right to order others about, we will see new Majdaneks in the 20th century.
So where is the foundation of this German feeling of superiority? In the past, some will say. There is no doubt that in the past Germany had remarkable philosophers, musicians, poets, and scientists. No anti-fascist thinks about putting down Goethe or Beethoven, but you cannot live off the legacy of culture. Culture is a continuing process of creation. And in fascist Germany nothing is left from the glorious past. We laugh at the degenerate who tries to replace a lack of wisdom and knowledge with an impressive past. It is ridiculous and despicable for a nation to burn museums and libraries while at the same time pointing to Schiller and Kant.
Others would argue that Germans are proud of their present. What is there to be proud of? A money-grubbing Goering? A lascivious Goebbels? Ignorant and lewd ministers? A hardworking Himmler? Or are they perhaps boastful of their sophisticated technology, well-kept cities, and comfortable houses? But the fascists did not create any of this: Hitler only ravaged Germany. It is also good to recall that American technology is higher, that Dutch cities are cleaner, and Swedish housing is more comfortable. Besides, technology alone cannot be the pride of a people unless the strength of a nation is connected to its higher aspirations. And in fascist Germany civilization serves only the lowest aspirations. So the gas chambers for the mass murder of children became a natural expression of German technology.
No, the feeling of superiority that the fascists instill in their children is based neither on the past nor on the present. German superiority is steeped in prejudice, in the belief in the magic properties of German blood, a conviction that everything German is better than anything non-German. . . .
The origins of rivers of blood appear to be seemingly innocent swamps of human stupidity. Children sometimes make fun of things they are not familiar with; then mothers reproach them and the child, as he grows up, learns that the world does not end at the corner of his street. Each person and each nation loves what they grew up with. What Russian would be indifferent to a white birch tree? But we have never claimed and never will claim that a birch tree is more noble or more worthy than a cypress tree or a cedar tree. Your mother may be smarter than your neighbor, but you do not love her for that, you love her because she is your mother. Genuine patriotism is modest and has nothing to do with nationalism: patriotism—is brotherhood; nationalism—is carnage and death. . . .
In the countries they captured, the Germans killed all the Jews: the elderly and nursing babies. Ask a captured German why did your compatriots annihilate six million innocent people. And he will say: “They are Jews. They are black (or red) haired. They have different blood.” This began with vulgar jokes, with name-calling by hoodlums, with graffiti, and all this led to Majdanek, Babi Yar, Treblinka, to ditches filled with children’s corpses. If before Treblinka antisemitism could appear to be a common, ugly outburst, now it is a word soaked with blood; the Polish poet Julian Tuwim says “Antisemitism is the international language of fascists.”
The whole world now sees the consequences of racial and national arrogance. The ovens of Majdanek, where the Germans consumed people of thirty nationalities because they were—Russians, French, Poles, or Jews—these frightening ovens did not emerge right away. They grew out of an upbringing based on the hatred of whole nations. People all over the world need to remember that nationalism is the road to Majdanek. If a nation builds its freedom on the oppression of another, if a state restricts the rights of citizens of a different color, if a society persecutes a man because the shape of his nose or the way he speaks differs from that of his neighbors, so that nation, that state, that society is in danger. . . .
We must remember: fascism was born out of the greed and stupidity of some, and the perfidy and cowardice of others. If mankind wants to put an end to the bloody nightmare of these years, it must put an end to fascism. Half measures will not do here. If fascism is left somewhere to breed, then in ten or twenty years we will again see rivers of blood. A nail drives out a nail, but you cannot drive out fascism with fascism. You cannot liberate nations of one brand of fascism and deliver them into the hands of fascists of a different brand. Fascism—a terrifying cancerous tumor. It cannot be treated at mineral spas. It needs to be removed. I do not believe in good-hearted people who cry over executioners: these alleged do-gooders are preparing the death of innocent millions. The nations of Europe fought courageously against the invaders; and nations are not Moors who could leave after finishing their work. The French have a good saying: in his house, the collier is a master. Not only the French understand this saying. The Red Army has demonstrated what it means to liberate: the Poles, Norwegians, Serbs and Slovaks understand this. We do not install half-fascists in place of fascists: we liberate without quotation marks. We know that democracy is the daughter of a nation and not a glamorous lady whom you could only adore from a distance. . . .
Nations who experienced the fascist tyranny will understand us without any lengthy explanation: this is a time of nations and not diplomats. The courageous people of France will understand us. Our allies will understand us. There was a time when the British believed in the magical properties of the English Channel. Now they understand that the Channel is not a barrier against fascism. For a long time, the British prohibited the entry of dogs into the country: this is how they try to protect their country from rabies. But rabid, two-legged creatures in contrast to four-legged ones possess different “Fau.” And only complete destruction of fascism—from Warsaw to La Linea—can protect England from a new disaster.
When Die Pommersche Zeitung dares to claim that the Germans crossed their borders as the most peaceful missionaries, it means that the fascists now have only one hope: the loss of memory. After a severe injury, doctors sometimes diagnose a condition called amnesia. The injuries to the world are immense but nations do not suffer from amnesia. They will remember everything in the days of judgment. Even after the victory, they will not forget these terrible years. We must remember: this is our obligation to the dead heroes and to the children.
These cruel visions must remain before our eyes: this is the price for saving our world. I know that it is easier to forget but we will not forget. We solemnly swear: remember, remember, remember!
Alex Jones shares a belief with the Satanists: libertarianism, which is effectively, is founded on the Satanic tenet of “do what thou wilt.” Ultimately, however, the libertarian movement in the United States is a front for the CIA and World Bank, through its promotion of the economic theories of the Mont Pelerin Society, which is associated with the occult tradition of synarchy.
MK-Ultra agent Timothy Leary was also a libertarian and supported the candidacy of Ron Paul for president in 1988 as leader of the Libertarian Party. A floppy disk was sent out as an invitation to a Ron Paul fundraiser hosted by Timothy Leary at his home in Benedict Canyon, which included the following message from Leary:
Thank you for joining me today in support of Ron Paul and the Libertarian Party. As we enter these closing years of the Roaring Twentieth Century, we’re going to see personal computers enhance our lives in ways we can scarcely imagine. Fellow Cyberpunk Chuck Hammill has helped me assemble a collection of bits and bytes you may enjoy.
If you’re wise ... digitize!
Alex Jones admires the theories of Rothbard, a student of one of the leading members of Mont Pelerin, Ludwig von Mises. Rothbard was also a co-founder of the Charles Koch Foundation in 1974, with one of the infamous Koch brother, Charles, chairman of the board and chief executive officer of the conglomerate Koch Industries. David Koch ran as a Libertarian Vice-Presidential candidate in 1980, and advocated the abolition of Social Security, the FBI, the CIA, and public schools.
In July 1976, Charles Koch Foundation changed its name to the Cato Institute, which serves as a libertarian think tank headquartered in Washington, DC. According to the 2011 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report (Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania), Cato is number 14 in the “Top Thirty Worldwide Think Tanks” and number 6 in the “Top Fifty United States Think Tanks.” Cato also operates Libertarianism.org which features, among others, the writings of Rothbard and Robert Anton Wilson. In 1986, Wilson and Shae’s The Illuminatus! Trilogy won the Prometheus Hall of Fame Award, designed to honor classic libertarian fiction.
Todd Brendan Fahey, who was a guest at DisinfoCon, has been featured in the pages of right-wing conspiracy sites like Ron Paul’s associate’s LewRockwell.com, as well as Patriotist.com, and LibertyForum.org. A longtime writer for EtherZone.com. In or about 1989, Fahey was introduced to LSD and ended up infiltrating a group surrounding “Captain” Al Hubbard, the so-called “Johnny Appleseed of LSD,” who worked closely with Aldous Huxley in MK-Ultra.
Fahey became best known for Wisdom’s Maw: The Acid Novel, a “factionalization” of the CIA’s MK-Ultra acid-tests and their influence on the sixties counterculture. The book got rave reviews in the Village Voice, High Times, and a number of underground magazines, and gained the attention of cyperpunk personalities like Grateful Dead lyricist John Perry Barlow and R.U. Sirius, who is associated with Metzger. Fahey boasts of having read Gary Allen’s None Dare Call it a Conspiracy under the influence of LSD, and then joined the John Birch Society (JBS), though he continued to use psychedelic drugs.
Fahey had worked as a spy for the Defense Intelligence Agency chief Lt. General Daniel O. Graham, and served as aide to CIA agent Theodore L. “Ted” Humes, Division of Slavic Languages, who had worked with William F. Buckley in Japan against North Korea and China. Fahey also worked with Major General John K. Singlaub, an ex-OSS officer and head of the notorious “Phoenix Program” in Vietnam. Fahey worked for Singlaub within the World Anti-Communist League (WACL), a CIA front with ties to the John Birch Society through the Western Goals Foundation.
Western Goals was a private intelligence dissemination network active on the right-wing in the US. Western Goals was also associated with Reinhard Gehlen, with whom they shared a connection with the Order of the Knights of Malta (SMOM). The chairman of the Knights of Malta in the United States was Peter Grace, a key figure in Operation Paperclip. Grace’s company, W.R. Grace & Company, was founded by Peter’s grandfather, William Grace, who was a close associate of George de Mohrenschildty. Western Goals was finally wound up in 1986 when the Tower Commission revealed it had been part of the Iran-Contra funding network. Oliver North identified Western Goals founder John Singlaub as his liaison to the White House.
Singlaub, along with John Birch society members like J. Peter Grace, were also members of the Council for National Policy (CNP), wiich has been endorsed by Alex Jones. It was mainly through the backing of the CNP that the JBS’s rabid opposition to the so-called “communist” conspiracy assisted in the rise of the popularity of Ron Paul and the Tea Party, who spearheaded the cause of libertarian ideals. However, although the JBS attributed the root of such a conspiracy to the CFR, the early leadership of the CNP was comprised of members of the CFR, including Peter Grace. The CNP was described by The New York Times as a “little-known group of a few hundred of the most powerful conservatives in the country,” who meet three times yearly behind closed doors at undisclosed locations for a confidential conference.
CFR member Jesse Helms was also a key figure in founding the CNP. A 33º Mason, Helms played a leading role in the development of the Christian right, and was a founding member of the Moral Majority in 1979. Helms was close to Billy Graham, as well as Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, who also were members of the CNP. Among CNP’s founding members were also Senator Trent Lott, former US Attorneys General Ed Meese, John Ashcroft, Col. Oliver North and philanthropist Else Prince, mother of Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater USA.
Re: [Discussion] The gender war has been gaining steam for the last few years and only getting more intense. Where do you think its heading?
Women will start taking over most of the important position in the West because they keep doing better and better in schools and universities which are a requierement for these positions. They're also more social with more connections and have the law and the media on their side.
Most men will see no purpose in a society like this and opt out and go LDAR/NEET. Then women will lead that society to ruin in a comical clown world-ish way because they won't have any idea how to handle any of that.
The West will be taken over by a mixture of radicalized white men and lowinhib high T ethnics who don't give a shit about any sort of virtue signalling ideology. These men will then kill each other in a race war between Muslims+ethnics and white nazis and take over whatever young women will be left as sex slaves and to reproduce and build a new society. Old women and oldcels will be probably killed off as useless drain on a society that can no longer support them, unless they would have some practical knowledge like engineers or doctors.
The West will then go back to primitive ways of racism and religious fanaticism and will eventually end up fighting back Chinese imperialism.
Some Western countries become defacto colonies of China like Africa. Life is shit but less degeneracy. Back to dark ages. People will wonder why the fuck anyone thought giving women rights was a good idea. The post-1945 West will be seen as the biggest meme in history.
Sexbots and artifical wombs will take the role of females. Natural females will stop recieving their gender halo as more men covert to artificial reproduction/love. White knighting will be a thing of the past. In a sense, women will finally be equal to men. Disposable and interchangable cogs to society. Eventually females will be phased out entirely since they are more expensive to maintain then males.
This will happen or society breaks down catastrophically and we regress to middle ages.
The establishment will always be on the female side. What will happen is the formation of a underclass of men NEETing or wageslaving in shitty jobs while women and chads live like kings. Obviously a system like that is not sustainable, women don't pay taxes, so i guess they will create some bullshit to take away money from this new underclass, like a bachelor tax.
900,000,000 Are Going to HELL, But Don't Worry You're Safe
Hell is a real place and the Bible teaches us all those who have not trusted Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour will go to Hell and be cast into the lake of fire. Evangelist Joe Kirby pleads with Christians to do evangelism and reach lost souls who are heading to hell and will enter into gloomy darkness.
All it takes to burst the material bubble of the physical UFO "myth" is to visit You Tube and take in several of Terance McKenna's chats from that remarkable brain that sours elsewhere. If you can escape in your mind for even a minute the physicality of being of ourselves and the UFO phenomena that we have enshrouded ourselves, then you may have some glimmer of the folly and misdirection of the human condition.
But beware, the screams of the avid materialist, the physical imperialists, harkers of science, that are hung up on things. They will come along and attempt to be "rational" and cram you back into their concepts of neat, individual, and environmentally controlled containers they keep designing and constantly redesigning for us to accept and desire such that we won't be content to study our navels for too long at any one time.
Humans are so perspective and subjective prone that they can never see beyond their self-contained shell of body and mind. There is a whole universe out there but you would never know it plodding around in the dirt.
I recently watched a video posted by a YouTuber by the username of “Truth96130,” that is basically telling people Hell is not real and that it is a lie of the Devil that works for his benefit. Yes, seriously, Truth96130 really believes this. In the video a renowned and once respected Pastor by the name of “Carlton Pearson” claimed that God told him Hell is not real. I watched the entire video and gave it the complete chance to convince me that his claim was true. What it did convince me of is what the Bible had already warned me about, thanks to Jesus. I will demonstrate to you, the reader, with Bible verses that you can go look up yourself (not my philosophy), and the words of Jesus himself, how this claim is a full-fledged doctrine of demons.
“Now the Holy Spirit tells us clearly that in the last times some will turn away from the true faith; they will follow deceptive spirits and teachings that come from demons.” (NLT, 1 Timothy 4:1)
This verse by itself should be sufficient evidence for anyone to see that the “Hell doesn’t exist claim” is a trick of the devil to deceive those who are not strong with the Holy Spirit. The Bible warns us of false doctrines, false Prophets, and false Messiah’s. Did Pastor Carlton test the spirits? Did he pray on it and ask God, Jesus, or the Holy Spirit for confirmation? I don’t think so, and neither did Truth96130. The devil is known for offering people things (sinful things) for instant gratification and happiness. God on the other hand is always patient and long-suffering, doing things at the right place and time. There is usually a lesson learned through a journey before you receive something from the Lord.
“Dear friends, do not believe everyone who claims to speak by the Spirit. You must test them to see if the spirit they have comes from God. For there are many false prophets in the world.” (NLT, 1 John 4:1)
Then you have Jesus telling you himself about hell, are the words of Jesus not sufficient? Truth96130 gave no credit to what Jesus said, and said that Jesus spoke in parables which are not historical events. So only the historical things that Jesus spoke about have value and not parables? Are you kidding me? Jesus was teaching lessons about Heaven and Hell, why would it need to be something that happened? Besides, hypothetically it was happening, people were going to Heaven and Hell after death.
It’s these type of people who cherry pick and choose what is convenient to fit their lifestyles, so that they can continue to do what they know is sinful and not feel convicted of it. They are only tricking themselves, but the worst part is they are trying to take others with them! (See Figure 1)
“So ignore them. They are blind guides leading the blind, and if one blind person guides another, they will both fall into a ditch.” (NLT, Matthew 15:14)
I refuse to let that happen, God ordered us to be the salt & light of the world.
“You are the salt of the earth. But what good is salt if it has lost its flavor? Can you make it salty again? It will be thrown out and trampled underfoot as worthless. “You are the light of the worldlike a city on a hilltop that cannot be hidden. No one lights a lamp and then puts it under a basket. Instead, a lamp is placed on a stand, where it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your good deeds shine out for all to see, so that everyone will praise your heavenly Father.” (NLT, Matthew 5:13-16)
Here is another lesson about Heaven and Hell from Jesus Christ our Lord and savior.
“Jesus also told them other parables. He said, “The Kingdom of Heaven can be illustrated by the story of a king who prepared a great wedding feast for his son. When the banquet was ready, he sent his servants to notify those who were invited. But they all refused to come! “So he sent other servants to tell them, The feast has been prepared. The bulls and fattened cattle have been killed, and everything is ready. Come to the banquet!’ But the guests he had invited ignored them and went their own way, one to his farm, another to his business. Others seized his messengers and insulted them and killed them. “The king was furious, and he sent out his army to destroy the murderers and burn their town. And he said to his servants, the wedding feast is ready, and the guests I invited aren’t worthy of the honor. Now go out to the street corners and invite everyone you see.’ So the servants brought in everyone they could find, good and bad alike, and the banquet hall was filled with guests. “But when the king came in to meet the guests, he noticed a man who wasn’t wearing the proper clothes for a wedding. Friend,’ he asked, how is it that you are here without wedding clothes?’ But the man had no reply. Then the king said to his aides, Bind his hands and feet and throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’ “For many are called, but few are chosen.” (NLT, Matthew 22:1-14)
Straight from the mouth of Jesus! This teaching illustrates how God sends his messengers and prophets to invite us to be saved, and to accept his Son, Jesus. We are constantly being invited to Heaven. The Bible is always referring to us (The Church) as the body of Christ and the bride of Christ, which is why this parable is about a wedding banquet for the King’s Son. The King being (God), the Son being (Jesus), the servants being (The Angels, Prophets, and Messengers), and the banquet representing (Heaven). I will let you guess who the invitees are.
Pay attention to the keywords, the servants were sent to notify “those who were invited.” This means not everyone is invited, so where do the uninvited go? I’m pretty sure they go to Hell. Let’s not forget “For many are called, but few are chosen,” that pretty much proves that some are chosen and some are not; meaning, some will go to Heaven and some will not.
Let’s continue on, the initially invited (The Israelites) rejected Jesus as the Messiah, some (The Pharisees) went as far as to kill him. From the beginning of the Bible all the way up to revelations, everyone that God has sent to warn humanity (His Prophets & Messengers) has been murdered or rejected all the way up to Jesus Christ and beyond. That covers the portion of parable talking about the invitees rejecting the invitation and some going as far as to murder the servants. Well, what about the King sending an army to destroy and burn their town?
I am glad you asked, throughout the Bible God turns his back on his people (The Israelites) when they reject him and rebel against him by doing such things as worshiping idols, breaking the commandments, and basically breaking their covenant with him. God removes his protection from them and even goes as far as to send other nations to attack them, as he did with King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. (The destruction and burning of the town also represents the end times in revelations). Of course, he was merciful and gave his people ample time to turn away from their sins and repent.
Moving on, the king sending his servants to invite everyone good and bad represents how the sacrificial death of Jesus enables everyone to be able to go to Heaven, without having to perfectly follow the Law of Moses. God knew we wouldn’t be able to do it. The Law of Moses was nothing more than just a long-term lesson to show us that even when facing the penalty of death and similar penalties, we would still break the law. He basically showed us that Humanity cannot govern itself without the help of God. We would need more than Laws, we would need a change of heart, and we would need the Holy Spirit.
Finally, the man not properly dressed illustrates how those that accept Jesus Christ (The Invitation), but continue to live in constant Sin, can lose their salvation. Just because you accept Christ does not mean you are guaranteed to go to Heaven, it’s only the start of your salvation. The Bible doesn’t say to run the race and fight the good fight for nothing. Now, Outer darkness, weeping, gnashing of the teeth, does that sound like Heaven to you? I think Jesus was speaking in a gentle fashion instead of being blunt and giving it to us straight; however, there is scripture which is not so nice, and for a good reason.
“And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous will go into eternal life.” (NLT, Matthew 25:46)
Eternal means nonstop, no breaks, forever, everlasting. Some people try to claim it’s just the second death, meaning you don’t get eternal life, but clearly the scriptures say different. You get eternal life, but it’s not the type of eternal life anyone would ever want. This is why God designed this life to be experienced in time. Things in time begin and end. This teaches us what eternity is. That is how just and fair God is.
“They will be punished with eternal destruction, forever separated from the Lord and from his glorious power.” (NLT, 2 Thessalonians 1:9)
If there is no Hell, how can sinners be punished in eternal destruction or separated from the Lord? Where will they go if they can’t go into Heaven?
“Throwing the wicked into the fiery furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” (NLT, Matthew 13:50)
“If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It’s better to enter eternal life with only one hand than to go into the unquenchable fires of hell with two hands.” (NLT, Mark 9:43)
“But there were also false prophets in Israel, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will cleverly teach destructive heresies and even deny the Master who bought them. In this way, they will bring sudden destruction on themselves. Many will follow their evil teaching and shameful immorality. And because of these teachers, the way of truth will be slandered. In their greed they will make up clever lies to get hold of your money. But God condemned them long ago, and their destruction will not be delayed. For God did not spare even the angels who sinned. He threw them into hell, in gloomy pits of darkness, where they are being held until the Day of Judgment.” (NLT, 2 Peter 2:1-4)
That last verse is just blatantly clear that we will all pay for our sins, and that Hell exist, period! It is true that you can pay for your sins on Earth, but only to a certain extent. God knows that we will not be ultimately perfect without sin,
“Not a single person on earth is always good and never sins.” (NLT, Ecclesiastes 7:20)
“As the Scriptures say, “No one is righteousnot even one.” (NLT, Romans 3:10)
But this does not give you the green light to do whatever you want to. God’s mercy, grace, and forgiveness are determined and given accordingly. God knows when you are trying not to sin, compared to when you really don’t care and are trying to fall through the cracks. We should strive to have as little sin as possible, remember God knows what is in our hearts. He can see if your desire is not to sin, but you fall to it not by deliberate will, but by the evil we all inherited from Adam & Eve, there is a difference.
The devil knows this, which is why he uses clever lies to deceive people. Of course he will tell us that our sins are forgiven through Christ, so it doesn’t matter what we do once we accept Jesus, and OH’ yeah by the way, Hell doesn’t exist. That is not what the true Word of God tells us. The “There is no Hell” claim is a doctrine of demons, there is no doubt about it. If Hell isn’t real then why did Jesus go down to Hell for three days to console the spirits that were imprisoned there?
“Christ suffered for our sins once for all time. He never sinned, but he died for sinners to bring you safely home to God. He suffered physical death, but he was raised to life in the Spirit. So he went and preached to the spirits in prison, those who disobeyed God long ago when God waited patiently while Noah was building his boat. Only eight people were saved from drowning in that terrible flood.” (NLT, 1 Peter 3:18-20)
Truth96130 claimed that I am confusing the time of this verse. The verse above clearly states that Jesus went to preach to the spirits in prison (Hell) that disobeyed God during the time of Noah, basically all the people who died in the great flood; which by the way, is historically recorded in every culture around the world. If there is no Hell and I am confusing this verse, which I am obviously not, then why didn’t these same spirits go directly to Heaven? Why does the Bible say they are in prison? Why doesn’t the Bible simply say, “Jesus swung by the Prison (Hell) to bail these Spirits out?” Now let’s say there is no Hell, why are these Spirits in prison? What is this prison?
If you go back to (NLT, 2 Peter 2:1-4) which I mentioned earlier, you will see “For God did not spare even the angels who sinned. He threw them into hell, in gloomy pits of darkness, where they are being held until the Day of Judgment.” Key sentence “where they are being held,” doesn’t that coincide perfectly with the spirits in prison! You know, prison, jail, being held captive, I don’t know about you, but it sure makes sense to me. This is the perfect example of scripture backing up scripture. As the saying goes “the writing is on the wall,” and let’s not forget about the parable of Lazarus and the rich man. (See Figure 2)
And his soul went to the place of the dead. There, in torment, he saw Abraham in the far distance with Lazarus at his side. (NLT, Luke 16:23)
When I mentioned this to Truth96130 his response was, “well that’s just a parable, and it’s not a historical event.” That statement does not in no way, shape, or form prove that Hell is not real, in fact it diverts from the fact that Jesus used a parable to teach a lesson about Hell. Keyword, “lesson,” Let’s look at the definition of the word parable.
A short allegorical story designed to illustrate or teach some truth, religious principle, or moral lesson.
A statement or comment that conveys a meaning indirectly by the use of comparison, analogy, or the like.
Well there you go, a parable is designed to teach a lesson of truth. Just because it’s not a historical event does not mean it is not true. I recommend reading the entire chapter of Luke 16. All words out of the mouth of Jesus, let me remind you. Over and over again in the Bible Hell is spoken about, illustrated, and re-cautioned to those that would believe, keyword believe. The Devil would love for people to not believe in Hell, that way people would just live how they feel and do what they want without having to worry about the repercussions.
Finally, Pastor Carlton and Truth96130 argue that God is love and he wouldn’t do these things to us. I mean how could an all loving merciful God send his people to eternal torture, right? Well once again, directly from Bible verses and not my philosophy, I will show you how God is justified in everything he does. He is the genuine holder of truth, he sets the standards, and he uses fair scales, weights, and balances. We would like to believe we know more than God, we would like to believe our ways are just, we would like to believe we can replace his laws with our own, but the truth is God is the Creator and we are the created. God set the laws of the universe, not us. Who are we but mere mortals.
“For just as the heavens are higher than the earth, so my ways are higher than your ways and my thoughts higher than your thoughts.” (NLT, Isaiah 55:9)
Do we really expect to have the same mental capacity as the entity that created us and the Universe? Seriously? If that were the case then why would we even need God at all? We would be just like him, which is the exact claim the devil made before he was found with sin and casted out of Heaven. The devil claimed he would be like the most high.
“I will climb to the highest heavens and be like the Most High.” (NLT, Isaiah 14:14)
The created cannot expect to comprehend and know as the creator.
“How foolish can you be? He is the Potter, and he is certainly greater than you, the clay! Should the created thing say of the one who made it, “He didn’t make me”? Does a jar ever say, “The potter who made me is stupid”?” (NLT, Isaiah 29:16)
Furthermore, as I tried to understand why God would send people to Hell for not meeting his qualifications, I learned some important truths. God has a standard, the one and only true balance of justice, and he will not break it for anyone. He will not be a hypocrite and break his word. Anyone who breaks the law is subject to the consequences, even the Angels.
Example of Truth: Anyone that is truly honest with pure integrity would understand that it is justified for their child to go to prison for murdering someone. Only hypocrites and people without standards would argue different.
People that go to Hell choose to go to Hell. People that go to Heaven choose to go to Heaven. (See Figure 3) God did not make us robots, he gave us self-awareness. I ask the reader, what has more value? A living being that was programmed to be righteous, or one that wasn’t but chose to be and now is? (Causality) There is a reason for everything, which is not just a “saying.” You might not agree with the reason, but who are we to tell God what is and is not fair. I am 100% sure if Jesus Christ disobeyed God, God would have sent him to Hell too.
Another misconception is that it doesn’t bother God to send people to Hell. That is a lie of the devil. The same way it hurts parents to discipline their children with the rod, it devastates our Father to sentence us (his children) to Hell. God does not enjoy this which is why he sacrificed his only Son.
“For God loved the world so much that he gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life.” (NLT, John 3:16)
“The Lord isn’t really being slow about his promise, as some people think. No, he is being patient for your sake. He does not want anyone to be destroyed, but wants everyone to repent.” (NLT, 2 Peter 3:9)
There is no excuse, we are warned and given a lifetime to get it right.
Then comes the question? We’ll if God is all loving and merciful then why does he let such suffering happen on Earth? That one is easy. There is suffering on Earth because we have free will to do what we want to, and some of us want to continue to do evil things. Some of us want to follow the devil instead of God. Some of us love sin more than we love our creator.
“And the judgment is based on this fact: God’s light came into the world, but people loved the darkness more than the light, for their actions were evil.” (NLT, John 3:19)
People judge God and they never even get to know him. We’ll what about the good people who have bad things happen to them? Why doesn’t God protect them? First of all, what good people? We are all born evil.
“For I was born a sinneryes, from the moment my mother conceived me.” (NLT, Psalm 51:5)
We inherited evil from Adam & Eve. We have to be taught to be good. We have the knowledge of good and evil, but without the help of God we will always favor evil. We are self-serving and self-gratifying.
“For they loved human praise more than the praise of God.” (NLT, John 12:43)
Also, remember we are not just facing people with free will that choose to be evil. We are facing our adversary the devil, and we are also facing spiritual battles in the unseen world around us.
“We know that we are children of God and that the world around us is under the control of the evil one.” (NLT, 1 John 5:19)
“Stay alert! Watch out for your great enemy, the devil. He prowls around like a roaring lion, looking for someone to devour.” (NLT 1 Peter 5:8)
“For we are not fighting against flesh-and-blood enemies, but against evil rulers and authorities of the unseen world, against mighty powers in this dark world, and against evil spirits in the heavenly places.” (NLT, Ephesians 6:12)
And that my brother’s and sister’s is why there is pain and suffering in the world. Jesus made it very clear that we will suffer in this world, so why not suffer for him instead? Why not suffer to make it to the pearly gates?
“And all nations will hate you because you are my followers. But everyone who endures to the end will be saved.” (NLT, Matthew 10:22)
“Students are not greater than their teacher, and slaves are not greater than their master. Students are to be like their teacher, and slaves are to be like their master. And since I, the master of the household, have been called the prince of demons, the members of my household will be called by even worse names! (NLT, Matthew 10:24-25)
“Yes, and everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution.” (NLT, 2 Timothy 3:12)
Jesus did not promise life without problems once you start following him. He tells no lies and gives it to us straight. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is not about infinite happiness in this life, but it is about trials and tribulations leading to infinite happiness in the afterlife. Jesus never said we had to be perfect, nor does the Bible. The Bible tells us to turn away from Evil, stride to change; and most importantly, to ask God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit to help us do it. We are incapable of doing it on our own. So make no mistake of misunderstanding that only perfect people make it to Heaven, which is another lie of the devil. Name one person in the Bible, besides Jesus, that didn’t sin. You can’t do it. Do not try to earn your salvation, instead embrace it. Salvation is a gift from God, it is meant to be received and maintained.
“Salvation is not a reward for the good things we have done, so none of us can boast about it.” (NLT, Ephesians 2:9)
Believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who sacrificed himself on the cross so that we can be forgiven for our sins, become reborn and move forward from there, and know that hell is a real place. Fear the Lord of Heaven’s armies and respect who he is.
“Fear of the LORD is the foundation of true knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and discipline.” (NLT, Proverbs 1:7)
“Fear of the LORD is the foundation of wisdom. Knowledge of the Holy One results in good judgment.” (NLT, Proverbs 9:10)
God can take our mistakes and help us correct them, he can help anyone, anywhere, anytime get back on the course he designed for them. It is never too late to turn to God through Jesus Christ. Simply lift your hands up to God and repeat “Jesus I repent of my sins and I accept you as my Lord and savior, Amen.” Then seek the kingdom first, read the Bible, continue to pray, and always talk to Jesus looking for guidance and answers, and remember we have the Holy Spirit to help us through it all.
“But when the Father sends the Advocate as my representativethat is, the Holy Spirithe will teach you everything and will remind you of everything I have told you.” (NLT, John 14:26)
“Seek the Kingdom of God above all else, and live righteously, and he will give you everything you need.” (NLT, Matthew 6:33)
I encourage all my readers to fact check me, go look for yourself and make sure that I am not misleading you. Make sure that I am speaking from the lessons of the word of God and not from my own philosophy. Make sure that I am not twisting the word of God. I also invite my readers to comment and share your opinions down below in the comment section. May the Lord of Heaven’s Armies Bless you all!
I am currently reading and quoting from the New Living Translation version of the Bible.
1. I hate children. I think they're dumber the bricks and twice as abrasive. Hence, whatever special treatment that society gives children these days (and yes, it is a fairly recent development that we don't smack the shit out of our little brats when they question our supreme authority) seems stupid to me. When did the adult population become second-class citizens to a bunch of snot-nosed little cretins?
2. If we're talking about people that chop kids up and stuff them in garbage bags while playing the Moby's "We are all made of stars" on their iPods then I have no sympathy for them (because that song is awful) and I don't much care if they get beaten up in prison. However, I don't hate them one ounce more than I hate someone who did the same thing to a 25-year-old or a 35-year-old or an anything-year-old. In fact, I'd be more upset depending on the victim. For instance, if someone killed a 35-year-old artist or scientist I'd be a lot more upset than if the same person had killed 100 children. Children all have the potential to accomplish big things and that's part of why society prizes them--but I prize the people who have already accomplished something more.
3. Most of the people in prison for sex crimes against kids are in there for non-violent coercion of older kids (10-15) for sex. I don't believe that such people should be in prison. I don't subscribe to the ludicrous notion that someone under 18 can NEVER give their consent. And I don't view such people as worse than murders or even as bad people AT ALL. Society has placed a stigma on them as it has placed on Jews, on blacks, on gays, on masons, on countless social, racial and idealogical groups past and present.
If you go back a little over 100 years ago, girls were being married off before their breasts had started budding. I'm not saying things should return to that pattern--I'm just using that as an example of who recent the stigma on pedophilia is. Do you think human nature has changed drastically since that time? Do you think that the genetic disposition towards nubile young bodies has dissipated simply because we passed a law or two against it? Take a look around our culture and you'll see that we're as youth obsessed as we could ever be. And frankly, I don't think it's healthy for us to simulataneously deny our nature on a physical level and languish in it on a cerebral level, via Hillary Duff, Britney Spears, The Olsen Twins, Aaron Carter and all the other boys and girls who became international sex-symbols before their 18th birthdays.
I understand that you and countless other sheeple believe that the youth of this country are special and therefore entitled to special rights and priveleges and anyone who lusts after their plump little apple-shaped bottoms with drool pooring from their lips is a depraved and irredeemible monster bent on the hideous exploitation of innocence to feed the bonfire of his carnal desires. The problem with you is that you don't distinguish between pedophiles and child-rapists, which is about as fair as me using Jeffrey Dahmer to exemplify gays or OJ Simpson and Scott Peterson to exemplify straights.
Finally, I'd like to point out that most of the children--boys and girls--raped in this country every year are raped by straight, white men who are typically most attracted to fully developed women. They are usually family members or friends of the family of their victims and use their leverage to get some easy pussy. It's like when you get really desperate as a teenager and get your dog to lick your balls (don't deny it, you fucking freak--Kinsey did studies). People settle. And people with sociopathic tendencies settle for children because they see that they can get away with it and lack the conscience not to.
But sociopathy and pedophilia are two entirely different things. Most pedophiles are not sociopaths and most sociopaths are not pedophiles. Yet pedophiles are judged by the small cross-section between the two, even though most pedophiles have never engaged in sex acts with children and most of those who have did it under circumstances socially acceptible (under the right conditions) just a little over a century ago.
I hope I've made myself clear.
[JFL] [BoomerPill] Boomers genuinely believe that dating is really easy these days because of internet dating sites
I was chatting with my mom the other day. As always, the subject eventually moves on to how I’m still single at 40.
She’s a sheltered female boomer who drifted through her life aimlessly and blissfully on Just Exist Mode.
She finally says “Why don’t you try internet dating? Everyone can find someone there. I know loads of people who met on the internet!” in an authoritative, matter-of-fact manner. She then starts naming people she knows who met their partner via internet dating (they are literally all foids or chads, not even normies).
Seriously, JFL, I spend half my life on the internet and she thought I’d never tried that.
Boomers genuinely, unironically think that “everyone” - really, everyone - can find their exact looksmatch soulmate on the internet. They live in such a ridiculous alternate universe, I can’t even imagine it. It must be like some colorful, dreamlike, Dr Seuss fantasyland.
Your moms still alive at 40? My parents are gonna die when I’m 20 or 30 because they had me at 40.
Also you’re old
I’m an oldcel, one of the few that even failed to get laid in the 90s/2000s. My parents were fairly young when I was born (early 20s), people used to have kids much younger. Also they’re healthy.
Online dating made everything way harder because foids now have 24/7 access to chad dick
Well yeah, exactly. This is what boomers and foids don’t understand.
They think foids go for their looksmatch (because they often did back in the 60s/70s/80s).
They think humans are naturally a “coupling” species, but this was introduced by religion (foids are naturally hypergamous, like most animals).
[On a video of a Black Lives Matter rally]
Watch this video. Only the most oblivious would call that scene a mere political rally. Politics is the art of the possible. The kumbaya session depicted in the video cannot possibly stop the race riots. Nor are we seeing an ideological struggle session. Ideology seeks temporal ends.
No, what that video documents is a congregation engaged in public worship. It's not a political rally. It's a liturgy. The Cultists truly believe in the original sin of white privilege, and they have faith that the Death Cult's sacraments can expiate it.
That's why the rioters have been torching churches. An invading people with their own religion always desecrate the enemy's temples to seal their conquest. Hence the media trotting out that old Judas James Martin on CNN. His job is to make the case for setting up the statue of Moloch in the sanctuary.
The relentless attack on Christianity staged by the Death Cult for the past fifty years is a backhanded compliment paid to the Church. They're more keenly aware than most Christians of how great a threat the Church is to them.
One other thing that video proves is man's need for religion. The Cult sold its bill of goods to secularists under the guise of atheism, but it's now clear that the shiny, sexy utopia the fedora-tippers were promised isn't coming. Many of the r/atheism crowd must know they've been had, but they continue to go along out of sheer inertia.
There's a glimmer of hope here. Like all crises, spiritual crises present opportunities. People are hungry for God. The Death Cult first starved them by cutting them off from Jesus Christ, then swept in to fill the void they'd created. But their demonic anti-faith can't satisfy the human need for meaning. No matter how many times they check their privilege, the Cultists can never be absolved of their racial guilt. They'll forever be Untouchables in the Cult's hierarchy without hope of salvation.
You beat a moral vision with a superior moral vision, and Christianity is the highest, most blindingly radiant moral vision ever revealed to man. The Cult wouldn't have had to spend several decades and trillions of dollars obscuring that light otherwise.
Christians have a peerless tradition of moral sanctity, philosophical genius, and historical charity. We could spiritually wreck the Cult Clowns overnight if 1% of us grew a spine. So that's what we'll have to do. Don't count on the out-of-touch and sometimes complicit hierarchy to swoop in and save the day. As has often been the case before, it's up to the laity. That's fitting, since it's the laity's vocation to consecrate the world to God.
So get out there and get consecrating.
You can start by rejecting the pop culture propaganda the Cult uses to proselytize. Don't fund people who hate you, and make sure to support creators who want to entertain you. The crowdfunding campaign for my new mecha-military sci fi book is the perfect chance to do just that!
[The image depicts a gloomy German city where a giant, terrifying skeleton monster is peering into the only apartment that has a German flag instead of a Turkish one. On the sides is the text:]
THE SHARE OF POPULATION IN THE WORLD OF THE PEOPLE OF LIGHT dropped from 50% IN 1900 TO 28% in 1950 TO 11% IN CY+3
AND CURRENTLY LESS THAN 60% OF CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS OLD IN GERMANY ARE ETHNIC GERMANS
DINDUS, SPICS, CHINKS & MUDS ARE NOT “IMMIGRANTS”
THEY ARE BIOWEAPONS
America is based on the philosophy that our rights come from God and that governments are instituted to secure these rights. However, the globalists’ trade agenda to establish a UN world government by means of a series of multilateral and bilateral trade agreements is a direct threat to the security of our rights.
The deceptive, the transformation of 28 formerly independent European nations into a repressive European Union supranational government reveals how globalist schemers plan to merge the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a North American Union on the way to a UN world government.
Although the globalist schemers have been trying to establish a North American Union through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), their progress has been stymied, largely due to the grassroots resistance of The John Birch Society and our allies.
The newly negotiated NAFTA, known as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), appears to further this NAU effort. USMCA has many provisions for “promoting further economic integration.” As we have learned from the example of the EU, economic integration leads to political integration.
In order to prevent the globalist schemers from erecting a North American Union on the foundation provided by the USMCA, we must convince Congress to vote against the USMCA.
The globalists in the office of the United States Trade Representative are working on many more trade agreements. While President Trump is indeed getting better deals that result in more American-made products, jobs, and a better economy, globalists in his administration are using each of these deals to further entangle the United States deeper into regional integrations. As the EU members have experienced, this will lead to a large loss in American sovereignty, including even our Constitution in the long run.
When President Trump was first elected, he sent shock waves through the globalist community that Americanism, not globalism, is our credo. Yet, those in the Deep State continue to do whatever they can to block “America First”.
JOHN BERMAN (HOST): We just heard it. The sound stopped right there. Jeffrey, you heard him say "how many times can I disavow David Duke?"
JEFFREY LORD: Margaret mentioned Ronald Reagan. When Ronald Reagan ran for governor of California, the press tried keep trying to get him to renounce the John Birch Society. And finally Reagan's answer was, "I am not endorsing them. They are endorsing me. I have nothing to do with them." He didn't play the game in other words. Donald Trump isn't playing the game, although he certainly denounced him. I mean, David Duke is a hardcore leftist. He's an anti-Semite. Yes, Margaret, the Ku Klux Klan is a function of the left. It was the military arm of the Democratic Party. Hello? Donald Trump's daughter and son-in-law are Jewish. David Duke is an anti-Semite, for heaven's sakes. This is ridiculous.
MARGARET HOOVER: When William F. Buckley was starting the conservative movement in the 1950s and 1960s, the John Birch Society did the same thing. They were trying to be part of the conservative movement and what William F. Buckley said is, "no, you have to stand for something. You have to have principles." He said "you are not going to be part of this movement." Where is the moral courage on behalf of Donald Trump, who aspires to be the leader of the free world, to say on some level at some point we do not need the voice and the support of bigotry?
LORD: Margaret, the Ku Klux Klan is a leftist group.
HOOVER: It is a hate group, Dave. It is a hate group, Jeffrey Lord.
LORD: It is a leftist group.
HOOVER: I don't care what side they're on. They are on for hate, they are on the side of hate. They are on the side of murder. They are on the side of blood on their hands. This is not -- to blame them on the left. This is a scourge on humanity, this is a scourge on American politics. And to suggest that it is part of the Democratic Party is missing the point. And your guy would not denounce them yesterday. And that is bad for America and it is bad for the Republican Party.
BERMAN: Go ahead, Jeffrey.
LORD: Margaret, it is a racist hate group from the left. And that counts. That is important to understand. It is not conservative. It has nothing to do with conservatism. All of these Klan members who have been elected to Congress and U.S. Senate and governorships over the years, supporting Franklin Roosevelt because they like Social Security. Let's get our history straight.
This is why -- this is exactly the kind of thing why people are voting for Donald Trump. Because they think the media is making something out of nothing. Nothing. This is crazy.
Judging by the fact that Islam allows unlimited divorce, 4 wives + unlimited maidservants, and the putting to death of anyone who offends Islam, and that the Islamic heaven is full of nubile young women, I can't see there is much difference between wicca and Islam.
The main reason Bronydom is seen as a gender poison’ to men is because of the surface neoteny, but scratch the pastel exterior and you’ll find a show who’s main themes are social maturity, importance of tradition, family and bravery in keeping civilisation together. Because it is a girl-power show, though, most antagonists are defeated through cooperation and shows of solidarity. In real life, if the women of the Troy rode out to meet those trying to bring down the city walls, they’d be put to the sword. Hence Celestia keeps male royal guards around.. but anyway.
It’s important to remember that most of the foes in MLP are simply Other Ponies, who for whatever reason are prepared to destroy or damage the trust that hold society together for their own ends. This varies between low-level shysterism like Trixie to industrialists like Flim and Flam. Equestria Girls: Rainbow Rocks as well had villains that succeeded mainly through social manipulation and destroying the mutual trust by setting different social types against each other. The central message of the show is that Friendship and trust forged through experience and mutual understanding are paramount in having a livable, sane society. At a very basic level, the ability to trust to a high level those around you is integral to pony (white) society. Trademark show baddies exploit this trust and destroy society n the bargain. Merchant-capitalists Flim & Flam sold gimmicky, useless tonics’, and Trixie paraded as a potential saviour, only to fail miserably when a real threat popped her ego balloon. When these hacks are exposed and you shine the light of truth on them, they scatter like roaches. Trixie & Co are summarily expelled from Ponyville.
In Equestria Girls: Rainbow Rocks, the villains actually succeed. Aside from a far-right conspiracy of Friendship Peddlers, the Dazzlings An evil trio of malicious spirits manage to hypnotize the whole of Canterlot High, setting every caste, class and faction within the school against each other using a Battle of the Bands. The crowd broils over into seething resentment, and the Dazzlings take the central spotlight and highest social status by Wow-ing everyone with displays of being the most aloof, the most self-absorbed, the most narcissistic and self important. After all, when all of society is atomised into competing factions, the most logical role model is to be the most sociopathic. Hence the section of Western/White Society that relies most on the aristocracy for its morality The labouring working classes Idolise the false gods of the Kardashians, and other vapid, pointless mouthbreathers, who hypnotize the many by being just so Cool, so above those stupid no-good rednecks, like a weeping Caitlyn Jenner receiving an award for battling transphobia-induced PTSD or Obama grieving for one of his many Sons. It’s worth noting that these entertainers pass for ponies, but they’re not really. They’re just devils and monsters passing themselves off as white Sorry, Canterlot High students when it suits them.
When there is no common goal and social trust is eroded to the most basic level, the ideological class can take control by peddling false and misleading narratives. Society continues a slow decline into total disintegration, and the hawkers are always there, selling false causes, feel-good balm and a conveniently weak and marginalised enemy to blame Obviously, those sick and depraved right-wingers and their racism, and 'microaggressions’ round every corner that drive innocent black journalists to shoot down their coworkers.
A consensus on an obviously false ideology 'We’re all equal!!’ paralyses society as individuals suppress anything that makes them conspicuously different. In 'The Cutie Map’ episodes, Starlight Glimmer takes on this ideological caste. Because ponies are suppressing the natural ways they adapt and help each other by playing to their strengths, in order to appear 'equal’; society begins to predictably spiral into total poverty. Remember kids: Choose equality as your special talent. More builders are men instead of women? Sexist. Not enough dindus in college? Racist. And so on.
Difference and equality are mutually exclusive, as equality means 'the same as.’ Starlight has the answer: If there are problems, the cause is inequality. The solution? More equality. We need more Eritean and Somalian refugees, just to prove how much equality we can have, and we’ll throw those friendship-peddlers in jail for a good measure as well!! We don’t have any cutie-marks of our own, there’s nothing special about us, so who cares if we’re displaced? Of course, bronies went off into a tizzy with this one. They mean Equality, but not our Equality right?! That’s not fair! Gay Marriage! And Stuff!!
Starlight Glimmer achieves her total control of Europe through the Televitz, sorry, Staff of Sameness; through which ponies have their memories of what makes them different to the other peoples of earth stripped from them, leaving them scrabbling miserably by, unable to cooperate, harmonise or build a functioning community with the similarly mezmerised ponies around them. The episode is resolved and modernity is destroyed when Starlight is shown to be just another shyster somepony who hoodwinked and betrayed her folk in exchange for power. There are many whites like this. No doubt if Starlight was here today, she’d work at the BBC.
(Extract from A gentle introduction to Unqualified Reservations (part 1))
The triangle of professors, bureaucrats, and public opinion is stable, because the professors teach as well as advise. Of course, there is a time lag. The system experiences some strain. But it will stay together, so long as the polarity does not randomly reverse - ie, because Cthulhu decides to suddenly swim right rather than left.
But no. Cthulhu may swim slowly. But he only swims left. Isn't that interesting?
In the history of American democracy, if you take the mainstream political position (Overton Window, if you care) at time T1, and place it on the map at a later time T2, T1 is always way to the right, near the fringe or outside it. So, for instance, if you take the average segregationist voter of 1963 and let him vote in the 2008 election, he will be way out on the wacky right wing. Cthulhu has passed him by.
Where is the John Birch Society, now? What about the NAACP? Cthulhu swims left, and left, and left. There are a few brief periods of true reaction in American history - the post-Reconstruction era or Redemption, the Return to Normalcy of Harding, and a couple of others. But they are unusual and feeble compared to the great leftward shift. Nor, most important for our hypothesis, did they come from the universities; in the 20th century, periods of reaction are always periods of anti-university activity. (McCarthyism is especially noticeable as such. And you'll note that McCarthy didn't exactly win.)
The principle applies even in wars. In each of the following conflicts in Anglo-American history, you see a victory of left over right: the English Civil War, the so-called "Glorious Revolution," the American Revolution, the American Civil War, World War I, and World War II. Clearly, if you want to be on the winning team, you want to start on the left side of the field.
And we are starting to piece the puzzle together. The leftward direction is, itself, the principle of organization. In a two-party democratic system, with Whigs and Tories, Democrats and Republicans, etc, the intelligentsia is always Whig. Their party is simply the party of those who want to get ahead. It is the party of celebrities, the ultra-rich, the great and good, the flexible of conscience. Tories are always misfits, losers, or just plain stupid - sometimes all three.
And the left is the party of the educational organs, at whose head is the press and universities. This is our 20th-century version of the established church. Here at UR, we sometimes call it the Cathedral - although it is essential to note that, unlike an ordinary organization, it has no central administrator. No, this will not make it easier to deal with.
This strange chiral asymmetry implies some fundamental difference between right and left. What is that difference? What does it even mean to be left rather than right? How can an entire system of independent thinkers and institutions, without any central coordinating agency, recognize that everyone should go left rather than right?
[Serious] What's your stance on smart women?
Do you hate extremely intelligent women as well? I often find myself feeling the utmost rage at brainless foids, but I'm willing to engage in conversation with those who show some kind of brain activity. Those ones, although rare, are actually pretty neat to talk to. Not trying to white knight or anything but objectively the smart ones seem bearable
"Intelligent" women are like genetic freaks and Olympic athletes.
A rare occurrence.
[gif of a man pushing another man to the ground to stomp on his face]
never seen one, they dont exist.
Yeah, I'm making this post because surprisingly I know more than one. (but less than 5)
fair enough eh
i hate them more because they make me feel tiny penised and jealous. They are extremely Chad-only
To the contrary, I have found the truly "intelligent" women I've met insufferable cunts. So high up in their ivory towers that all common sense completely eludes them. At least my lowbrow female acquaintances often have some modicum of street smarts and sometimes even a faint glimmer of incipient redpill awareness.
I know of women smart ON PAPER. There's plenty of women with fancy degrees. I have met very few though that have the ingenuity and cunning of a man, and when I do they make me feel like shit
There are dumb women and dumb women who pretend to be smart.
brutus: As racially aware people we're keenly aware of the all pervasive jew marketing strategy of jamming niggers down our throats in all advertising. There are virtually no ads for any products sold via all of the advertising organs that do not feature a nigger, usally accompanied with an adoring White girl, as part of the ad.
This leads me to the new Tesla Model 3 electric car that was just unveiled for sale a few days ago. Because of the superior nature of the Tesla when compared to all gasoline powered cars and the major success of the Model S, Tesla has found no need to advertise. The jew has effectively been totally cut out of the loop. We're certain we hear the jew gnashing its teeth over this as it scrambles to figure-out a way to suck some money out of the Tesla phenomenon.
And then those thoughts further led me to notice, as I was watching the many YouTube videos that feature everything Tesla.......incredibly, there is not one nigger to be seen in any of those videos! And then it hit me that on a subconscious level I was really enjoying these vids and Tesla's successes and being able to have happy moments without having a nigger intrude as they do in all other commercial advertising.
I'm certain the thugs from the NAACP will soon kick in the front door at Tesla corporate office and demand nigger representation. But until then, here's a nigger-free video to enjoy before the jew shoves one down Tesla's throat and we're made to watch an ad that features a nigger driving a Tesla with a beautiful White girl sitting next to him, smiling admiringly.
notmenomore: Nice nigger-free video and a nice nigger-free car, too.
I think I've got the basic formula in current use for "diverse" TV advertising. It goes like this:
If there are only Whites in an ad, then there can only be ONE (1) White. Under no circumstances can ANY ad have more than ONE (1) White unless there's a "diversity factor".
Anytime there is (or has been) an ad with the only one White, then the ad must be followed and preceded by a "diversity based" ad.
All diversity ads must include one nigger at the absolute bare minimum. But how can you have "diversity" if there's only a single nig? The answer, naturally, is that you can't. There must be many and diverse niggers as well as as much mystery meat as possible. (The ideal mystery meat is so mixed that its ingredients cannot be isolated or determined, but like the judge said about pornography, "you know it when you see it.")
A diverse ad cannot have only niggers, although occasionally a single nig in full monkey regalia: dress shirt & tie, suit and Rolex watch, can be allowed. But that's not true diversity. To attain the gold standard of true diversity it's imperative to have buck niggers surrounded by fawning and adoring White nubile females. They need to positively drool over the nigger, while the suave nigger pretends not to notice ().
Sequentially, the programmers can run as many consecutive diverse ads as they prefer, as long as the cardinal rule of not allowing any all-White ad to be followed by more of the same is observed. In fact all-White ads are really inexcusable and are apparently tolerated only because the sponsors seem to understand that bucks trying to sell life insurance, AARP memberships, and fancy medicare plans will yield zero results. Amazingly, that excuse seems to make it possible for the sponsoring juden to get away with (most) carefully selected White only commercials. As long as they run at a less than 10 to 1 ratio they somehow squeak by.
But the main genre is the happy group of wisecracking kids or horny young adults. Mostly nigs and mystery meat with a token White girl or two and maybe even a little White cuck over on the side. All the Whites are always paying closest attention to the wisdom being dispensed by the bucks (or loud sheboons). The more mud, the better.
TV forever and ever. AMEN.
Kennedy, Fisher and Bigtree: a triple dose of anti-vaccine injected into upcoming chiropractic conference
Even as the flu rages, chiropractors will be stoking their anti-vaccination ideology at a March conference with speeches from anti-vaxx Illuminati Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Barbara Loe Fisher and Del Bigtree.
Even as the flu season, with its consequent hospitalizations and deaths, rages on, chiropractors are outdoing themselves in promoting anti-vaccine ideology at this year’s “Freedom for Family Wellness 2018 Summit Washington, D.C.” (but actually in Reston, VA), scheduled for March. While in previous years so-called “chiropractic pediatrics” conferences have invited anti-vaccine hucksters like the disgraced and defrocked former British physician Andrew Wakefield and Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine [Mis]Information Center, this year will feature not only Fisher, but also “Ranting Robert” F. Kennedy, Jr., fresh from his disappointment in not being named head of a proposed, but never realized, vaccine safety commission by fellow anti-vaxxer, President Trump, and Del Bigtree, producer of the widely discredited “documentary,” VAXXED. Attendees will get 24 hours of chiropractic continuing education credit in 37 states (so far), as well as D.C. and British Columbia.
The Summit is hosted by the International Chiropractic Pediatrics Association (ICPA), which promotes straight subluxation-based chiropractic treatment for pregnant women, infants and children. Well, actually, for anyone with a pulse, but that’s who they concentrate on. Its 2014 conference headliners were Fisher and Wakefield.
Before we get to the upcoming conference, let’s review the field of “chiropractic pediatrics,” its affinity for pseudoscience and hostility to vaccination. The ICPA is just one of three chiropractic pediatric groups, all of which support anti-vaccination ideology and promote chiropractic diagnosis and treatment of infants and children for both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions, including:
otitis media, asthma, allergies, infantile colic, . . . enuresis, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, myasthenia gravis, ADHD, and Tourette syndrome. For the most part, treatment for all of these conditions is based upon detection and correction of vertebral subluxations, . . . [even though] there is no scientific basis for the contention of chiropractors that subluxation correction will restore or maintain health or that such subluxations even exist.
In addition, pediatric chiropractors promote “wellness care” for children, advising that children should visit a chiropractor 6 to 12 times a year to be checked for phantom subluxations.
Another pediatric chiropractic group, the International Chiropractic Association’s (ICA) Council on Chiropractic Pediatrics, featured Wakefield at its 2016 conference, as well as a showing of VAXXED. In 2017, the ICA Council on Chiropractic Pediatrics conference participants were shown portions of the film Vaccines Revealed, essentially a parade of well-known and thoroughly debunked anti-vaccinationists, in some cases being interviewed by other anti-vaccinationists, produced by someone whose past work has promoted anti-vaccination views, who also spoke at the conference.
Chiropractic education in pediatrics consists of one 22-hour pre-clinical course in “pediatric topics” and chiropractors can graduate without ever having seen an actual pediatric patient in clinical training, which chiropractors themselves admit is inadequate. The ICA’s post-graduate courses (they don’t do residencies) which allow one to call oneself a “Diplomate” in chiropractic pediatrics, consist of less than 400 hours of classroom training in a series of weekend courses, sometimes in airport hotel conference rooms, with no hospital training and no contact with diseased or injured children. The ICA’s recommended books on vaccination contain plenty of anti-vaccination propaganda.
The third chiropractic pediatrics group, the American Chiropractic Association’s Council on Chiropractic Pediatrics promotes “the acceptance and advancement of pediatric chiropractic care.” Although it does not have its own training program, four out of five Council Board members are ICA “diplomates” in pediatric chiropractic, one Board member describing the program as a “3-year post-graduate course of study,” conveniently leaving out the part about the weekend courses and lack of clinical training.
The ICPA offers its own certification (200 hours) and diplomate programs (an additional 200 hours), under the auspices of the Academy of Chiropractic Pediatric Practice and is “endorsed and certified” by an organization called the Academy of Chiropractic Family Practice. Like the ICA, the ICPA teaches its courses in hotel conference rooms.
The ICPA also sponsors a certification in the Webster Technique, which is based on the biologically implausible and unproven notion that a chiropractic “adjustment” will “reduce the effects of sacral subluxation/SI joint dysfunction” facilitating “neuro-biomechanical function of the pelvis,” supposedly leading to an easier birth, even to the point of turning a breech baby (all the while denying that this is what they are claiming).
Chiropractic anti-vaccination ideology is not limited to chiropractic pediatrics. It is long-standing, firmly entrenched in chiropractic philosophy, and well-documented in the medical literature.
Anti-vaccination attitudes still abound within the chiropractic profession. Despite a growing body of evidence about the safety and efficacy of vaccination, many chiropractors do not believe in vaccination, will not recommend it to their patients, and place emphasis on risk rather than benefit.
One study found a correlation between seeing a chiropractor or a naturopath and lack of flu vaccination in pediatric patients. Another study found that children who saw chiropractors were significantly less likely to receive each of three CDC-recommended vaccinations. Yet another found that student anti-vaccination attitudes actually increased in the later years of chiropractic and naturopathic programs. Anti-vaccination attitudes among chiropractors have been documented by the mainstream media as well (also here and here).
It is thus that Kennedy, Fisher, and Bigtree find their ideal audience: a group preconditioned to uncritically accept their anti-vaccination message, impervious to science and evidence, yet perfectly positioned to spread their misinformation to patients and parents via their unlimited license to diagnose and treat any person of any age with virtually any disease or condition, thanks to state chiropractic licensing laws, aided by a closed loop, chiropractor-controlled system of education and regulation.
Long-time anti-vaxxer Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who will be delivering the keynote at one evening session of the “Summit,” is no stranger to regular SBM readers. His crackpot ideas about vaccines, lies and conspiracy mongering have been the subject of numerous SBM posts. Kennedy continues to flog the debunked connection between thimerosal and brain disorders, including autism, long after thimerosal was, as a precaution, removed from pediatric vaccines and remains a trace ingredient only in some flu vaccines. Assisted by another person honored with an SBM post this very week, Mark Hyman, MD, he wrote a book promoting his discredited ideas. Our good friend Orac has extensively covered Kennedy as well. Among Kennedy’s anti-vaxx escapades:
* His article “Deadly Immunity,” an “anti-vax hit piece,” was riddled with so many errors that it was ultimately pulled from Salon’s archive.
* Calling CDC officials “criminals” because they area “poisoning kids” in an interview with fellow anti-vaccine crank Boyd Haley.
* Saying he’d like to see pediatric infectious disease physician and co-inventor of a childhood vaccine that saves thousands of lives, Paul Offit, MD, behind bars.
* Analogizing the CDC whistleblower manufactroversy to the Tuskegee syphilis experiment on black men, an analogy he dredged up again in describing a California bill (which has since become law) tightening vaccine exemption requirements, all the while cozying up to the racist and anti-Semitic Nation of Islam.
Well, you get the idea. But in case you don’t, Laura Helmeth nicely summarized Kennedy in Slate:
The short version of the vaccine conspiracy theory (if you are stuck on the phone with RFK Jr., you will be subjected to the long version) is that a vaccine preservative called thimerosal causes autism when injected into children. Government epidemiologists and other scientists, conspiring with the vaccine industry, have covered up data and lied about vaccine ingredients to hide this fact. Journalists are dupes of this powerful cabal that is intentionally poisoning children.
You’ve met Barbara Loe Fisher here on SBM too. In the heyday of the media’s penchant for reporting “both sides” of the vaccination manufactroversy, Fisher was the go-to gal for reliable fear-mongering about vaccines. She was, after all, a founder of the NVIC (a sponsor of the “Summit”), a source of vaccine “information” that claims to be neither for nor against vaccination, only for “safe” vaccinations and informed consent. Fisher’s talk is titled “Your Right to be Informed, Your Freedom to Choose.” By continuously moving the goalposts, the NVIC ensures that vaccination is never safe and that there is always a fresh supply of misinformation with which to scare parents from choosing vaccination for their child by exercising their (not the child’s) freedom to exempt the child from school vaccination requirements by claiming their (again, not the child’s) religious or philosophical opposition.
Fisher remains unrepentant after being excoriated by investigative journalist Seth Mnookin in his excellent book The Panic Virus (2011). Here’s how Mnookin described Fisher’s talk at a 2009 Autism One conference:
Barbara Loe Fisher, the grande dame of the American anti-vaccine movement, explained how vaccines are a “de facto selection of the genetically vulnerable for sacrifice” and said that doctors who administer vaccines are the moral equivalent of “the doctors at Nuremberg.” (That parallel, she said, had been pointed out to her by Andrew Wakefield . . .)
Finally, Del Bigtree will speak on “Finding our Freedom,” freedom apparently being a code word at the “Freedom for Family Wellness 2018 Summit” for “refusing vaccination based on bad science and debunked conspiracies.” Bigtree was recruited by Andrew Wakefield to make the “documentary” VAXXED, a film version of the anti-vaccination movement’s talking points, delivered by an all-star team of dedicated anti-vaccinationists. He then shamelessly fed on the African-American community’s understandable mistrust of medicine to promote it. Fortunately, the movie seems to have impressed no one outside of the anti-vaxx echo chamber. It was widely panned as propaganda, “fraudulent,” presenting facts out of context, “closer to a horror film than a documentary,” “paranoid,” and a “desperate attempt to hoodwink the public for no greater purpose than making money.”
As if that weren’t enough propaganda, Andrea Marconi, a chiropractor and the NVIC’s Director of Professional Resources, and Theresa Wrangham, the NVIC’s Executive Director, are giving a talk on “Efffective Vaccine Informed Consent Advocacy.” Marconi’s NVIC bio makes it clear that pediatric chiropractors are expected to be advocates for vaccine refusal:
she has the honor of working with the Chiropractic profession as well as other groups to educate and support doctors who are speaking with their patients and communities about protecting the legal right to exercise religious and conscientious belief vaccine exemptions to go to school, be employed and otherwise participate in society.
And chiropractors are stepping up to the plate, as a recent CBC investigation revealed, discouraging vaccination as well as other evidence-based care.
Apparently, one of the “other groups” chiropractors are working with are midwives, with whom they are promoting “collaboration” as the ideal pregnancy-perinatal team. While the science-based training of Certified Nurse Midwives might make them resistant to chiropractic pediatrics and its attendant anti-vaccination ideology, direct-entry midwives and naturopath-midwives, who lack medical training and come equipped with their own anti-vaccination proclivities, will be a softer target.
So, besides “wellness” through chiropractic “adjustments,” what do pediatric chiropractors recommend to ward off vaccine-preventable diseases? Another speaker provides a clue: Cilla Whatcott, a homeopath who holds a Ph.D. from the Kingdom College of Natural Health, will be giving a talk on “Real Immunity and Homeoprophylaxis.” According to Whatcott’s website:
The goal of [homeoprophylaxis] is to introduce into the human system safe, homeopathic versions of particular diseases in order to naturally stimulate the immune system. As a result, susceptibility to targeted diseases can be reduced. . . protecting your children from infectious contagious disease.
This is dangerous nonsense, as explained by SBM’s own infectious disease expert, Mark Crislip, MD. Whatcott is disciple of Issac Golden, an Australian homeopath whose ideas are rejected not only by responsible medical authorities but other homeopaths as well.
It is sadly ironic that, even as state health departments and the federal Centers for Disease Control fight the worst flu season in a decade, it is the state and federal governments who create the conditions for this perfect storm of dangerous pseudoscience and conspiracy-theory crankery that will discourage people from getting vaccinated. State licensing laws and chiropractic self-regulation (remember, 24 hours of CE credit!) along with federal Department of Education approval of chiropractic school self-accreditation, allow poorly educated and trained health care practitioners to provide substandard care to a vulnerable population
January 1st, 2000, 5am in the morning, I arrived in what was like a large desert, dry and infertile. The wind was so heavy and the weather was so hot. I saw a lot of weird and disgusting animals that I’ve never seen before in my life. I walked step by step through the desert till I found my self in a gloomy place. I had strange feelings that time and I could feel the pain spread to all of my bones. The situation was silent and dark. No wind blew. Dark cloud appeared and surrounded that place. I could not describe it in better words.
A huge gate appeared in front of me. I felt nervous and worried but I tried to open that gate anxiously. It was not difficult to open it. I opened it and was shocked because there was another gate bigger than the first one. It was written on top of that gate “VALLEY OF TORTURE”.
There was a doubt in my heart implicitly, whether I should continue this trip or not. But something so powerful inside of me made me to go on. My heart beat was loud as I could hear it myself while I opened the next gate and Oh my God! I could not believe, I could not believe what I saw but it was real.
There was a long dark path in front of me. I stood in the side of the gate watching and predicting how large and long that path was but I could not see it clearly. I saw a flame rise up in the end of that path. I thought it was a terrible ocean of fire!
Along the way I walked in that dark path, I saw many people were tortured by creatures wearing black clothes and having horns in their heads. I saw they were so cruel in torturing everyone there before they were put into the fire ocean at the end of the path. I heard affecting tears and pain mix up with dirty laugh sounds in that dirty place.
At the edge of the path, there was a young woman whose hands were bound at a piece of wood and she was surrounded by a lot of horned creatures who made fun of her and laugh at her. I saw her face was pail and white filled with fear. A strange weapon that I have never seen before was swinging in front of her face. I did not know exactly what it was but it was like a fork with a sharp cutting edge in the top of it. That weapon was carried by one of the horned devils which surrounded that woman. I heard the devils were threatening that poor frightened woman, “Lie!
Come on, lie!!!” I saw her become more frightened. She completely fell into the power of the horned devils so that she obeyed them whatever they wanted. That woman answered, “Yes, yes, I lied! I lied!” All of the devils were laughing, seems that they were satisfied with the young woman’s answer. I thought after that woman did everything that they wanted, they would’ve released her. But what happened next really shocked me! The devil stabbed that horrible thing into her face! The fresh blood squirted from her face! It was so horrifying! Her face did not have a shape anymore and her cry of pain was so heartbreaking!
“Stop! Stop it!” I yelled.
But strangely, they could not hear my voice; even more my appearance seemed invisible for them! I felt disgusted for everything that I saw, but there were a lot of other views that surprised me and made me shocked!
Then, I saw a man whose hair was burnt, only rotten skull remained. There were unburnable maggots coming out of his skull cavity. He was lying and carrying from the end of the path not far from fire, I thought that they tortured him for a long time. His body was burning and his flesh was melting because he was lying near the hottest fire ever!
The devils who carried him were laughing at him. There was nothing he could do besides surrender himself to them. He was dying but he could not die. He looked like having terrible pain, seemed he wanted to say something for mercy. One of those devils said, “Come on, masturbate! Masturbate!!” That man while shaking answered, “Yes, I masturbate! I masturbate! Aaaahhhhh!” He was screaming and a lot of maggots came out from all of his body so many!! I felt disgusted when I saw them, even when I heard his screaming it was so horrible!!!
There were more screaming and commanding that I heard. “Come on, drink! Drink! Gambling! Deceive!” and those devils were laughing and enjoying the moaning of pain and tears, as they were listening to wonderful music. I was afraid to walk in through that path. I only saw as far as I could and I was sure there were more kind of tortures at that place which is more appropriate to be called barracks of torture.
I found a view that made me really shocked, there were many righteous and religious people there!! I did not believe it but I did not have power to deny all that I saw. I heard all their screaming when they were being tortured. They cried out for God, “God, help me! God, do I always be together with You? You taught us at our towns and I served You Lord!”
They were begging to God but salvation had already been closed for them, till I heard they abused Him! My heart was breaking when I saw it! After that I was in the top of the horrible situation I could not continue that journey anymore. And I believed if I continued this journey, I would have been dead! “God! I cried Please bring me out from here! Please God!” All of these were a vision, a horrible vision, a vision of Hell! I was so happy when I found out that I was at home, even though after that I got ill for a couple days. All of my bones and pivots were hurt; I suffered stomach disorder and got shocked day by day.
I prayed to God and wondered what it’s all about, what He wants through my experience. God gave me understanding and deep burden for people around me. God wants me to tell you what happened and will be happened to everyone living in sin. A lot of them are having fun, eating, drinking, having party, free sex, drugs and others and it seems to them that they can enjoy them forever. They do not realize that hell and the horned devils are waiting for them. They are the next victims.
I know that God really loves you. This vision that was showed to me is proof that He’s still giving you a chance to repent.
My dear friend, I have to write this article to warn you. I do not want you having the same experiences as those people there. Truly, I love you all and I hope you will meditate on all of these and repent. Accept Jesus Christ as your saviour personally and start a new life and do not come out from the road that Jesus has giving to us from his blood that was shed.
God Bless You
TIFU:By admitting to my parents that I helped pay my sister's bail
This can't be a serious TIFU. If it is, your sister molested a 11 year old boy and a family member at that. We're not talking statutory rape either, which is still wrong of course, but this is outright pedophilia and child molestation. She is a sexual predator and hopefully she gets some serious jail time. As for you, well, I think your actions are indefensible and you deserve whatever consequences come your way.
Well, I posted on ELI5 and since my brother is 11(10 when it started) my sister isn't a pedophile, but more likely a hebephile.She may be a predator, but she does not need jail time.My sister needs help not prison.
She intentionally harmed another person, even worse she harmed a child. If anything deserves prison that's it. I'm not sure what the folks in ELI5 said but someone who molests a 10 year old I think qualifies as a pedophile.
Honestly I'm not sure if she actually hurt my brother.My brother was fine at the time of the sexual contact and he only changed and became gloomy when she left.He keeps telling me and our parents how much he misses our sister.I think there's a certain age of the child where the perpetrator becomes a hebephile and not a pedophile and 11 is around the age where it enters into hebephile territory
11 is at the very bottom end, and you said it started when he was 10. She's a pedophile. Your sister is sick and frankly you sound a little sick yourself. Hopefully your sister spends a good amount of her life in prison. And given your indifference to your brother being victimized I hope you see some life altering consequences yourself...you def seem to need a reality check.
Well than I have to disagree with you.As I said many times my sister doesn't need jail time she needs help.Fortunately she's an attractive, white woman from an affluent family who's done a lot of good in our community.If what the things I've read is correct than she'll probably get a lenient sentence and that's what I'm praying for.
You are almost as bad as your sister. I feel bad for your poor brother, and I hope that your parents send you away so that he doesn't have to live with your disgusting pedophile enabling behavior. He deserves siblings that don't rape him, and siblings that don't enable his rapist and then diminish what he went through.
I know it's not the politically correct thing to say,but I do doubt whether my sister hurt my brother.I've gotten a lot of pms saying that they consensually had sex at ages 10 and 11 and they turned out fine.I also remember there was a thread where people lost their virginities at young ages and they turned out fine as well.My brother was fine at the time of the sexual contact, but he's gloomy now because he misses our sister.He keeps telling me how much he misses Lily
I'm not defending what she did I'm just trying to help and care for her to the best of my abilities.
Hardcore Zionist stooge Donald Trump has illegally attacked Syria for Netanyahu and the Greater Israel Plan. He is a supremacist just like the Jew, he is an egoist just like the Jew, Trump thinks he has the moral right to violate sovereign nations because he’s the Donald. This fool could get us all killed.
Americans should be concerned that Jew Inc. has put into power a fool narcissist. Tweet after tweet proves this guys self absorption with his own greatness. Now he’s in charge, the big man on the totem pole, the decider in chief, another big egoist just like Il Duce Mussolini who ended up on a meat hook.
Want proof that Trump is self absorbed?
“All of the women on The Apprentice’ flirted with me consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.”
“The world was gloomy before I won there was no hope. Now the market is up nearly 10% and Christmas spending is over a trillion dollars!”
“There’s nobody bigger or better at the military than I am“
The politically naive alt-right feels betrayed just as the neo-left was by President Obama. The alt-right has awoken to the Trump betrayal which wasn’t a betrayal but really an unveiling. Trump is Jew whore just like Obama, Clinton, Bush, Ford, Nixon and all the way back to President Wilson who authorized the Federal Reserve. Make no mistake Trump is a hardcore Zionist whore of Netanyahu and world Jewry.
DENIAL OF THE ALT-RIGHT
TRUMP HIRED ZIONIST MOLE KUSHNER AND HIS WIFE
SHE VOLUNTARILY MARRIED A JEW
Trump is the President, if he didn’t want Zionists on his staff he wouldn’t hire them, if he wasn’t a tool he could call in the Marines and have the traitors of the Republic arrested. I can tell you as a former USAF officer for a fact that all military personnel will obey his orders without question. Whatever Trump says will be followed automatically as a command by all military personnel. So what this means is that “big man” Trump is doing what he is doing voluntarily.
To the alt-right it seems Trump has betrayed them but if you objectively examine his AIPAC and other pro-Jewish speeches you will realize that Trump is part of the Kosher Nostra in other words Trump’s is beholden and linked to Jewish wealth. Trump’s daughter Ivanka is married to 666 Fifth Avenue owner Jared Kushner who served in the Israeli army. Trump’s staff is loaded to the gills with Jewish moles, Goldman Sachs executives, Zionist warmongering generals. The idea that Trump is opposed to Jewry is patently false.
Where’s the proof that Trump is being controlled, coerced, or blackmailed? Trump is owned, Amerika is owned by world Jewry and this idea that we the people have any say in how things are is just not true. It is only an illusion that this a democracy, the ugly truth is that elections are staged events where people vote between two false alternatives.
As soon as the lying politician gets into office his concerns of the little people is soon forgotten because voting is a charade of the ruling class to establish authoritarian rule. They care nothing for us and have their own agenda, and in the case of modern states subverted by ZOG the agenda is an Israeli agenda. Fools on the antiwar left are fighting with the alt-right instead of uniting against ZOG. We have no hope if we can’t unite.
Amerika been fooled again because voting is manipulated emotional response and not objective reality. Well the koolaid is wearing off, the new boss will be worse than the old boss. The goy were fooled again and that is good because it will force them to dig deeper and discover Jewish control. America is ruled by Jews and they are masters of statecraft and deception. The people remain divided, and it will probably stay that way right up until the bitter end.
Trump is not betraying us all. Trump is part of the Jewish crime scheme. He didn’t flip all of a sudden, that is a misperception by those with stars in their eyes about making America great again. Doesn’t a slogan like that bother you? Why would we want to make a war mongering nation great again? The fools don’t understand the real plan is to destroy the United States by pitting it into a no-win war with Russia and Iran.
Jews plan to rule the world from Jerusalem. Fool Trump has promised to make that the Jewish capital. They need Amerika and Russia to go at it leaving them victorious. Zionist Jews are completely ruthless, they will do anything to get their way. The Israelis are masters of deception, they are the real terrorists, they did 911 to manipulate America into endless wars in the Middle East until they are used up and then thrown into the ditch.
How much more evidence do the patriots need before they through the towel in and realize they’ve been had? Trump is not your friend, he isn’t going to save America, he is not going to make America great again (if that was even possible on the long cycle). Trump is just another mad man who could get all of us killed.
TRUMP WAS NOT TURNED
TRUMP WAS NOT REPLACED WITH A BODY DOUBLE OR CLONE
TRUMP IS NOT BEING DOPED OR MIND CONTROLLED
TRUMP IS A ZIONIST, A PRO ISRAEL SUPREMACIST
As crazy as it sounds, all the facts point toward another war in the Middle East with boots on the ground by June 1st. The stakes are high and Putin is not leaving Syria. Trump has proved himself crazy with the Syria Tomahawk missile strike. Trump is like a character in the Dr. Strangelove movie, he’s going to ride the bomb into oblivion and in all probability nukes could be going off soon. Don’t be fooled by this cult of personality, Trump is a liar who told you what you wanted to hear to get elected, now he will implement the plans of his Jewish supremacist masters.
The Redistribution of Sex
One lesson to be drawn from recent Western history might be this: Sometimes the extremists and radicals and weirdos see the world more clearly than the respectable and moderate and sane. All kinds of phenomena, starting as far back as the Iraq War and the crisis of the euro but accelerating in the age of populism, have made more sense in the light of analysis by reactionaries and radicals than as portrayed in the organs of establishment opinion.
This is part of why there’s been so much recent agitation over universities and op-ed pages and other forums for debate. There’s a general understanding that the ideological mainstream isn’t adequate to the moment, but nobody can decide whether that means we need purges or pluralism, a spirit of curiosity and conversation or a furious war against whichever side you think is evil.
For those more curious than martial, one useful path through this thicket is to look at areas where extremists and eccentrics from very different worlds are talking about the same subject. Such overlap is no guarantee of wisdom, but it’s often a sign that there’s something interesting going on.
Which brings me to the sex robots.
Well, actually, first it brings me to the case of Robin Hanson, a George Mason economist, libertarian and noted brilliant weirdo. Commenting on the recent terrorist violence in Toronto, in which a self-identified “incel” that is, involuntary celibate man sought retribution against women and society for denying him the fornication he felt that he deserved, Hanson offered this provocation: If we are concerned about the just distribution of property and money, why do we assume that the desire for some sort of sexual redistribution is inherently ridiculous?
After all, he wrote, “one might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met.”
This argument was not well received by people closer to the mainstream than Professor Hanson, to put it mildly. A representative response from Slate’s Jordan Weissmann, “Is Robin Hanson the Creepiest Economist in America?”, cited the post along with some previous creepy forays to dismiss Hanson as a misogynist weirdo not that far removed from the franker misogyny of toxic online males.
But Hanson’s post made me immediately think of a recent essay in The London Review of Books by Amia Srinivasan, “Does Anyone Have the Right To Sex?” Srinivasan, an Oxford philosophy professor, covered similar ground (starting with an earlier “incel” killer) but expanded the argument well beyond the realm of male chauvinists to consider groups with whom The London Review’s left-leaning and feminist readers would have more natural sympathy the overweight and disabled, minority groups treated as unattractive by the majority, trans women unable to find partners and other victims, in her narrative, of a society that still makes us prisoners of patriarchal and also racist-sexist-homophobic rules of sexual desire.
Srinivasan ultimately answered her title question in the negative: “There is no entitlement to sex, and everyone is entitled to want what they want.” But her negative answer was a qualified one. While “no one has a right to be desired,” at the same time “who is desired and who isn’t is a political question,” which left-wing and feminist politics might help society answer differently someday. This wouldn’t instantiate a formal right to sex, exactly, but if the new order worked as its revolutionary architects intended, sex would be more justly distributed than it is today.
A number of the critics I saw engaging with Srinivasan’s essay tended to respond the way a normal center-left writer like Weissmann engaged with Hanson’s thought experiment by commenting on its weirdness or ideological extremity rather than engaging fully with its substance. But to me, reading Hanson and Srinivasan together offers a good case study in how intellectual eccentrics like socialists and populists in politics can surface issues and problems that lurk beneath the surface of more mainstream debates.
By this I mean that as offensive or utopian the redistribution of sex might sound, the idea is entirely responsive to the logic of late-modern sexual life, and its pursuit would be entirely characteristic of a recurring pattern in liberal societies.
First, because like other forms of neoliberal deregulation the sexual revolution created new winners and losers, new hierarchies to replace the old ones, privileging the beautiful and rich and socially adept in new ways and relegating others to new forms of loneliness and frustration.
Second, because in this new landscape, and amid other economic and technological transformations, the sexes seem to be struggling generally to relate to one another, with social and political chasms opening between them and not only marriage and family but also sexual activity itself in recent decline.
Third, because the culture’s dominant message about sex is still essentially Hefnerian, despite certain revisions attempted by feminists since the heyday of the Playboy philosophy a message that frequency and variety in sexual experience is as close to a summum bonum as the human condition has to offer, that the greatest possible diversity in sexual desires and tastes and identities should be not only accepted but cultivated, and that virginity and celibacy are at best strange and at worst pitiable states. And this master narrative, inevitably, makes both the new inequalities and the decline of actual relationships that much more difficult to bear
which in turn encourages people, as ever under modernity, to place their hope for escape from the costs of one revolution in a further one yet to come, be it political, social or technological, which will supply if not the promised utopia at least some form of redress for the many people that progress has obviously left behind.
There is an alternative, conservative response, of course namely, that our widespread isolation and unhappiness and sterility might be dealt with by reviving or adapting older ideas about the virtues of monogamy and chastity and permanence and the special respect owed to the celibate.
But this is not the natural response for a society like ours. Instead we tend to look for fixes that seem to build on previous revolutions, rather than reverse them.
In the case of sexual liberation and its discontents, that’s unlikely to mean the kind of thoroughgoingly utopian reimagining of sexual desire that writers like Srinivasan think we should aspire toward, or anything quite so formal as the pro-redistribution political lobby of Hanson’s thought experiment.
But I expect the logic of commerce and technology will be consciously harnessed, as already in pornography, to address the unhappiness of incels, be they angry and dangerous or simply depressed and despairing. The left’s increasing zeal to transform prostitution into legalized and regulated “sex work” will have this end implicitly in mind, the libertarian (and general male) fascination with virtual-reality porn and sex robots will increase as those technologies improve and at a certain point, without anyone formally debating the idea of a right to sex, right-thinking people will simply come to agree that some such right exists, and that it makes sense to look to some combination of changed laws, new technologies and evolved mores to fulfill it.
Whether sex workers and sex robots can actually deliver real fulfillment is another matter. But that they will eventually be asked to do it, in service to a redistributive goal that for now still seems creepy or misogynist or radical, feels pretty much inevitable.
History will prove the JBS [John Birch Society] was correct, after all. There is a global effort for a one world government.
(Note: They are reacting to pictures from a Tinder experiment. A Lookism user pretended to be a 15-year-old boy, and claims to have gotten over 700 matches.)
Just be underage bro | Lookism user catfishes as 15yo Chad
I did not need this sui-fuel today.
Holy fuck it's over for oldcels. "Just mature bro, you'll get higher SMV in your thirties" - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wish I wasn't too much of a pussy to kill myself, there is literally no point in being alive if you don't look anything close to that with similar height
"You're a sick pedo if you're attracted to anybody under 18!"
"Cum in me, young 16 year old Chad."
White Sharia when?
More screenshots here: https://lookism.net/Thread-FEMALE-PEDOPHILES-exposed-on-Tinder
Daily reminder: the age of consent in California is 18
God. Women are such degenerate sluts.
No wonder female teachers keep fucking their students
females need dem bones, no matter what age they're developing at lol.
I thought pedophiles were all ugly old men ??
When high school teachers fuck their students, they look like him.
Let me say this. Rather than be ashamed, I am proud to be white and of European descent. That’s right, I said it! I’m PROUD to be related, in a way that North African and Middle Eastern Muslims, Chinese, Indians, Sikhs and Pakistanis are not, to Dante, Shakespeare, Michelangelo, Aristotle, Aeschylus, Cicero, Sir Thomas Moore, da Vinci, Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Newton, Descartes, Hume, Kant, Darwin, Thoreau, Rembrandt, Hegel, Weber, Mill, Nietzsche, Booby Orr, Gordie Howe and Racine. The National Hockey League and the CN Tower says something to me which it can never say to “them.” You won’t see any hijabs or turbans or Chinese characteristics on those antique lithographs of the voyageurs and coureurs des bois paddling those beautiful birch-bark canoes.
In North America, the Trump Administration cannot deliver on their signature campaign promise: to build a wall on their southern border. It’s hard for me to understand how the Americans put up without a wall for so long. The RINO’s, the Chamber of Commerce and of course the Democrats see the future as brown. One seeks cheap, low and high skilled labour, the other, votes, to become the effective governing party, forever. Transferring money and power from whites to browns and blacks. This is a recipe for a dystopian third world hell-hole, not much different than India, Brazil and Africa. The point is, however, that if the Trump Administration can’t get their wall built, and Brexit can’t Brexit how do we, in Canada, expect to establish an immigration moratorium and repeal our Multiculturalism Act? Not very likely. We need contingency plans for a new homeland(s) inside Canada.
I’m an average Canadian and no modern-day Louis Riel but Canadians from the founding cultures need to look beyond a political solution and take heed of the events in South Africa; the UK, Sweden, Calais and throughout Western Europe. If Catalonia, Khalistan, Wakanda, “Farrakhanland,” Scotland, Kurdistan, Quebec, and “New” California, why not a homeland for European-Canadians in South-Western Ontario; the Maritimes; the Prairies, around Quebec City or the interior of beautiful British Columbia? It’s British Columbia, after-all.
A defined territory is crucial for the survival of an “ethny.” According to Dr. Frank Slater, “the special quality of a defended territory is that it insulates a population from the vicissitudes of demographic disturbances . . .” Acquisition and defense of territory, he argues, are therefore an integral part of the tribal strategy of humans. The passionate relationship between a people and its homeland has been constant throughout history. A people can suffer many setbacks, but as long as it retains its own territorial space, it can recover.
In the long run, only territory ensures survival, and human history is largely a record of groups expanding and contracting, conquering or being conquered, migrating or being displaced by migrants. The loss of territory, whether by military defeat or displacement by aliens, brings ethnocide precisely what is happening in “multicultural” Canada and throughout the West today. Also worth noting, Salter concludes that there is no evidence of so-called “hybrid vigor.” There is no increase in intelligence, health, life expectancy or creative ability in mixed-race populations. 
We can’t be accused of discriminating against people we don’t live with. The massive transfer of wealth and the $35B-$40B fiscal costs of immigration will disappear. We’ll never have to worry about being branded racists again. Taxes will decline, hospitals will become efficient again, and we’ll be able to move on our highways. Our environment will heal. We could banish employment equity plans and we might get lucky and find that many aliens self-deport. Go back home and be free at last from the terrible indignity of white racism. And take your employment equity plans with you! Here’s your hat, Hijab and turban, what’s your hurry?
The careers and lives of men like Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby were completely destroyed by women. Their mistake was to seduce and have sex with women while being ugly as sin. If they were good-looking, none of these accusations would have ever been made. No woman accuses a good-looking man of rape or sexual harassment. Why did it take so long for them to make these accusations? It's because these women now feel ashamed of themselves for having to sleep with ugly men for career advancement; they didn't have a problem with it then because they were shallow money-hungry whores trying to make it (like all women at some point in their lives).
But in retrospect, the fact that they had to serve as sperm receptacles for low-quality men fills them with horror and rage. The only way they could avenge this injustice was by doing what every woman does when an ugly man either flirts with her or has sex with her: go to the authorities and scream rape or sexual harassment. This is also why date rape exists. A woman thinks the man she slept with last night was a little too ugly for her liking, so to punish him for his ugliness she calls the cops and accuses him of rape. The fact that women can easily make up accusations like this to destroy men's lives is merely an indication of the tremendous sex-based discrimination found in our judicial system, as well as all other facets of our modern society. This is all conveniently reinforced by the reigning police-state ideology of female supremacism.
As an ugly man, you don't have to flirt or have sex with women to risk having your life destroyed by them. The ugly man must remember that women are a hive mind, robotic creatures all possessing the same negative eugenic reproductive programming. If women see your ugly face, they'll automatically want to destroy you. In their primitive hive mind, you need to be culled. They'll deliberately make life hard for you, going out of their way to swear at you and make fun of you. Many of them will threaten you with violence, knowing that you can't do anything about it because women are surrounded by dominant males ready to signal reproductive fitness by smashing your face in. They'll even bar you from decent employment, forcing you to seek mediocre, ill-paying work instead. This is because all HR departments are controlled by women.
If you look at them or talk to them, they can have you beaten up by an army of (more) dominant males. Although losers, these men beta orbit virtually every female. Women can make up any accusation they want against you and have you thrown in jail, even if you do nothing to them. Why? Because female privilege. Women are also terrified of being impregnated by low-quality male sperm for obvious evolutionary reasons. An ugly man in close proximity to nubile females simply increases this terror felt by all women a hundredfold. When in the midst of this terror and rage, the woman's primitive hindbrain tells her that she must fight or flee. Because she inhabits a female supremacist society that caters to her every whim, no matter how ridiculous, her best option is to fight back and completely neutralize the threat before her.
To justify our moral judgments, we invent victims even if there are none
1.first comes a moral judgment, like "promiscuity is bad", "creeps who possess child porn photos need to be punished", "having sex with adolescents is disgusting" (or "smoking marijuana is bad"). Some of these judgments stem from evolutionary mental modules hard-wired into our minds. Or course, our culture plays a role here too, especially in how we justify our moralistic feelings
2.After the fact, after we already decided that sex with nubile adolescent women is heinous, our mental "press secretary" has to come up with socially acceptable justifications for punishing people for apparently victimless crime. So our mind is made in ways that it finds justifications for our moral judgments. It comes up with logical reasons. It invents victims that need to be protected
[So, basically, you haven't read On the Origin of Species, and therefore have assumed that a) Darwin was anthropomorphizing Nature and b) that you somehow know what he was thinking.
Perhaps, and, really, I'm just tossing this idea out, I know it's crazy, but...
read the book so you actually possess a small faint glimmer of a clue.]
I have read his book but I am not convince about his findings and conclusion.
a) Yes, indirectly speaking, without Darwin's knowing, he was anthropomorphizing nature. How? He thought to himself that he knew nature more than anyone else on earth. Maybe he had talked to nature (a rock in Galapagos, maybe) in his coffee break, or had received from nature ( a squid, maybe) a documents saying that the origin of all species were caused by nature. And Darwin maybe had these hard facts/evidences from nature that he just kept them before his death and before he die, he thrown them all away. Because if Darwin did not have these evidences from nature, he would simply say that ALL SPECIES are interrelating, the logical and reasonable natural explanation of nature if you observed it well.
b) He was thinking that he was an smart guy of saying that NATURAL SELECTION had caused these new species. But the reverse was true. He had quickly plunged into the pond of supernatural.
Professor Patrick Minford, the chairman of Economists for Free Trade who hosted the event, said: "John Redwood's points on how the Government has slowed growth down were very interesting.
“A suspicious mind might think this was the deliberate act of a Remainer Chancellor to undermine Brexit and reduce confidence in a World Trade Deal.
"It is really time that the Chancellor both realises and acts on the economic benefits of Brexit, instead of following his officials’ gloomy views which condemn him to endless damaging austerity."
One former cabinet member at the dinner added: “It is almost as if they wanted to prove Project Fear right by slowing down growth. It’s amazing that we managed to get any growth at all.”
Another senior Tory Brexiteer said: “This certainly looks like the economy has been deliberately slowed down to undermine confidence in Brexit and going for a world trade deal instead.”
Feminism/Women Working/Hookup Culture has been an absolute nightmare. My 35yo oldcel observations on the state of Modern Women.
at the age now where I can see what is happening in these Nightmare Times, meaning I can see how life has ended up for the majority of my peers.
Some of my observations:
A ton of 40 something women going through midlife crisis and throwing their husbands out like fucking garbage.
Young 20 something women who are crazy liberal/sjw/pc freaks. They have colored hair and think that Donald Trump has "done" something to them on a personal level.
Women in their 40's who are childless and think that they can still have kids safely.
A shit ton of women in their 30's who are single mothers.
And as for my peers from HS/College(35yo):
I see a bunch of women who do have husbands but have 0 kids. Why did they even bother getting married. These are the so called "Career Women". They think some stupid fucking job is more rewarding/satisfying/gratifying than being a mother to a bunch of beautiful kids.
I also see a bunch of women that have only 1 fucking kid. 35yo and only 1 fucking kid. Back in the 1950's these chicks would of had 4-6 kids. And of course all of em did the alpha bucks and married some beta schmuck.
And then the rest of em are single Roasties who have jumped from cock to cock. 35yo: no husband, no kids, living in a shitty apartment but they have "Muh Career".
As for the men:
A lot of guys who have bastard kids. These dudes are paying Child Support.
Guys who have married below their level. A 4-5 guy marrying a 3-4 chick. They would of had looks-matched women in the past.
And a lot of the guys are single. The majority of the single guys are working shitty jobs. They aren't ugly or anything but they have limited money. I'm guessing these guys LDAR with their hobbies.
Demons are making their presence known more and more in our world. Websites dedicated to the paranormal proliferate on the Internet as well as in movies and TV shows which feature aliens and extraterrestrials.
When God destroyed the earth because of its wickedness, the fallen angelswho started all the trouble could not be drowned because they were spirit beings; so God sent them to a place the Bible describes as Tartarus to await judgment day. Jesus preached to these spirit beings in their prison cells after He arose from the dead as if to say, “Hello, boys . . . I’m back. I wonyou lost!”
Do you remember when the people in the Old Testament tried to build that tower to heaven and how God stopped the construction by giving them different languages? That tower, which we know as the Tower of Babel was not meant to be a literal tower to heaven; the people in those days had better sense to that they could build a tower to heaven.
That tower was meant to be a “stargate” or portal. The chief architect of the Tower of Babel was a great warrior/hunter named Nimrod. Nimrod was a descendant of Noah and is believed to have had Nephilim blood in his veins. After the Flood, Satan had another band of fallen angels breed with the women of earth and it seems that they still around today.
It is now known that certain ancient monuments around the world such as the Great Pyramid of Giza and those in Turkey, Cambodia and Mexico were most probably built by the fallen angels BEFORE the Flood there is no way human beings could have built those structures and the reason we know this is because those many-ton boulders were all copper-fastened the same way.
So there was an intelligence in ancient times that knew how to construct these monuments even though they were thousands of miles and thousands of years apart.
The fallen angels left behind forbidden knowledge or arcane technology to be found after the Flood. Ever since Nimrod’s attempt to build the Tower of Babel secret societies including the Freemasons, Illuminati and Bilderbergs have been plotting to break those fallen angels out of their gloomy dungeons to prevent Jesus from establishing His millennial reign on earth.
And guess who will turn the key?
The scientists at CERN. On the border of France and Switzerland, near Geneva, lies the town of Saint-Genis-Pouilly. The ancient Celtsa pagan civilization, built a temple to the god Apollo as this location believing it was a portal or gateway to Hades, the underworld. Today, Saint-Genis-Pouilly is the site of a modern-day Tower of Babelthe CERN Project.
Physicists tell us there are other worlds or realities in the universe called “dimensions” and these dimensions are linked to one another by whirling vortices called “wormholes.” Do you remember when Elijah was taken to heaven in a whirlwind of fire in 2 Kings 2:11? God opened what seemed to be a wormhole to transport Elijah from earth to heaven since heaven is in another dimension.
The scientists at CERN are preparing to open these wormholes connecting these dimensions in the universe and Christian evangelicals are warning them not to do it because Satan commands the Second Heaven and this will release demons into our world.
In the ninth chapter of the book of Revelation God gives John a vision of the Abyss being opened as demons rise from it “like smoke pouring from a great furnace” and rising with them is the ruler of the AbyssApollyon. So, it seems what these scientists at CERN are getting ready to do is foretold in the ninth chapter of the book of Revelation!
Just fucking kill yourself if you don't have massive cock
For fellow oldcels, skip this thread and click back, our lives are over and the following does not apply to us.
Let's be honest, most guys on this forum are decent looking and very young and will grow out of this incel phase when they finally leave their parents basement. This leads to the next problem. You need a huge cock to even get women to remember you as anything but another faceless cuckold.
How does it feel that women remember being screwed by Chad's massive Coke can dong just as much as they remember the birth of their children, graduating college, and unwrapping their puppy on Christmas?
They remember Chad's cock when they're in the nursing home even if they forget the name of their own kids.
[LifeFuel] Having a daughter doesn't mean you have to be a cuck
(video showing a Texas judge savagely beating up his daughter, uploaded by her; for more, see this quote)
As an oldcel I randomly remembered when this was all over the news back in 2011. I laughed my ass off re-watching it. For those too lazy to watch it's a Judge from Texas who beat his daughter's ass for getting on the internet when she was told not to. At 3:45 he drops a blackpill on what computers have done too.
THIS is the way to deal with an attention-whoring social media-addicted teenaged daughter. Most cucked left-wing dads not only would have tolerated this, they'd have also gone out and bought magnum condoms and gave them to the daughter for all the Chads and Tyrones she would be sleeping with.
I started practicing Falun Dafa (also known as Falun Gong) with my mother in 1998, when I was just a few years old. Over the years, I have seen many extraordinary scenes in other dimensions, some of which I would like to share here. When I was a child, I visited Nantianmen [also South Heaven Gate, in the legend of China, Nantianmen is the first major gate to enter the Heavenly palace] in another dimension. I remember standing before the bright red entrance with a sense of awe.
A lifelike golden dragon engraved on a pillar of the door watched me with its keen eyes and try as I might, I could not escape its gaze. It felt as though the dragon was trying to teach me some kind of lesson. Whether we perform good or bad deeds, nothing can escape the gaze of heaven. A holy atmosphere permeated the gate and its surroundings, though the inside of the gate was devoid of people.
While walking away from Nantianmen, I suddenly saw a crowd of people standing before me. These people looked white and transparent, resembling the concept of human souls. However, unlike normal humans, they emanated a sense of compassion. They were milling around a large white wall, urgently touching it in turn. Curious, I too went forward to touch that wall and saw the number “fifty” appear on its surface. The significance of that number still remains a mystery to me. I have a faint hint that it could be related to time. Perhaps it is a sign that time is limited and we should seize the opportunity to cultivate.
Once, I visited another dimension of the human world. Dark colors and a gloomy sky overwhelmed this dimension. It appeared very depressing. Most of the inhabitants had lost their souls, while their bodies wandered around like zombies. The only people there who were awake and had retained their souls were Falun Dafa practitioners, but there were so few of us that I estimated we numbered less than one in ten thousand.
As Falun Dafa practitioners, my mother and I belonged to the group of those who were awake. In contrast, my father existed as a soulless person. Although he had quit the Chinese Communist Party, he still firmly stood by its beliefs. Every Falun Dafa practitioner had a copy of the book Zhuan Falun. When practitioners physically touched each zombie with their book, a portion of their consciousness would awaken. However there were some who were too lost and could not be awakened, no matter how much we tried. My father was one of those who failed to wake up.
An extremely evil spirit resided in that dimension. It was an incarnation of the devil, a spokesperson for Satan and the evil communist specter. It drove a taxi, from which it threw sober people into that bleak world. The evil spirit eyed me with hate and anger. Unable to turn me into one of the soulless, it wanted to kill me. I was unafraid as I had Master's fashen protecting me. The evil spirit viewed humans as tools to be used at will. It caught a long haired, soulless woman and tried to use her to harm me. The moment we came into contact, part of the soulless woman began to dissolve into smoke. I felt pain and sadness on seeing this, as I knew her body and soul would be completely eliminated. I realized that evil spirits could not enter the bodies of Falun Dafa practitioners, and were even eliminated on contact. Awakened sentient beings, on the other hand, had to remain vigilant. Evil spirits could revert them to zombies if they let down their guard. In the final scene, I saw a small colorful train ferrying Dafa practitioners away from that bleak world.
In another experience I saw that I had once been a white phoenix. A fellow disciple, a red phoenix, accompanied me. We were spirit birds living in the heavenly realms. One day, Master suddenly called us to his side. I arrived earlier than my fellow disciple and learned that Master intended to teach the heavenly law in the human world. In that instant, I experienced a sense of jealousy. I did not want my fellow disciple to obtain the Fa and become stronger than me. I created two red birds to block his way, delaying his descent to the human realm in hopes of denying him the opportunity to obtain the Fa.
When my fellow disciple finally reached Master’s side, Master asked, “Why were you late?” He replied that two birds had blocked his path. At that moment, I clearly felt that Master knew I was responsible, yet he said nothing. Perhaps he knew that this would result in a difficult tribulation on my cultivation path. As I wished, my fellow disciple reached the human world later than me. We both became disciples of Buddha Shakyamuni. Perhaps because of our past history, my feelings for him seemed strange. I neither liked nor disliked him, but I knew with certainty that I didn't want to meet him. If he happened to be in the same city as me, I would immediately travel to another city. I took great pains to avoid seeing him.
Because I acted out of jealousy and continued to run from my mistake while cultivating in the human world, I was barred from entering the holy land of Buddha, although I was only one step away from the threshold. No matter how fast or high I flew, I was unable to break through that invisible barrier blocking my path. Because I failed to confront my mistake, I was unable to reach enlightenment. From these experiences, I learned the importance of facing up to all of my failings. I hope that sentient beings will learn to treasure this opportunity granted in the Fa rectification period, and cherish their lives by choosing the correct path. Finally, I would like to apologize for my past misdeed. My fellow disciple, please accept my apology!
In defense of ephebophilia, or as I call it the way of nature.
Look at any species. Mating begins with the onset of fertility.
That's really all I should have to point out, but because we live in oppressive times where understanding and empathy are scarce, I must resign myself to a more complex explanation.
First, we ephebophiles ARE NOT PEDOPHILES. I will reiterate this as many times as I have to. Pedophiles want to have sex with CHILDREN. As an ephebophile I would NEVER so much as consider having sex with a child.
Now, having sex with a fresh faced, virginal young teen on the other hand... that's another matter entirely. Show me the heterosexual man who claims he never imagines himself slaking his lusts on a tight, fresh, nubile, teenage female, and I will show you a liar.
The hypocrisy is one thing, but what I don't get about society's response to ephebophilia is ya'lls total lack of empathy. Y'know, the reason I'm really drawn to the younger kind has a lot to do with the victimization I've faced as an unattractive, beta INCEL man.
Personally, I suffer from depression, social anxiety, ADHD, and a few other things, and much of that stems from the bullying and misandry I've been a victim of. That's WHY I have to live the way I do. You all would call it immature, though it is anything but. Frankly, I just don't have seem to have much in common with other "adults", with their rabid materialism, consumerism, conformism, alcoholism, and incessant socializing/partying. I've always had more interest in supposedly juvenile (though I feel they can be very mature) activities such as cartoons, anime, playing with/constructing figurines, playing videogames, and just lounging around wasting a day, the way a child does.
I also feel I have the curiousity and innocence of a much younger person, I love reading wikipedia and learning about the world. You all haven't succeded in stamping any of that OUT of me, even though, lord knows you've all tried. These things don't make me immature, but they make me more empathetic towards younger people, because I can feel what it's like for them not fitting into this cruel adult world.
But do any of you pause to consider my richness and depth as a human being? NO. You just label me a pervert, pedo, and other bullying slurs -- which by the way aren't accurate, because I'm not a pedophile -- and move on.
Even though I have my reasons for being incredibly attracted to young, fresh, delicate, untarnished females, to be honest? I shouldn't NEED to explain myself. Ephebophilia is NORMAL. Has been throughout 99.9% of human history/prehistory. Is in every other species we know of. Sorry to introduce SCIENCE into a subject I know most of you are incredibly biased about, but it is what it is.
Thank you for reading and I hope you all found that illuminating. Now, if anyone has a legitimate (facts, not feeling based) reason for the hatred and discrimination we ephebophiles routinely face, I would love to hear it.
Beware of sex-negative MRAs
A casual observer might get the impression that the Men's Rights Movement is growing, since there clearly are more self-identified MRAs now than ever. But actually, most of this growth sadly consists of a cheerleading chorus for the feminist sex abuse industry rather than any real antifeminism.
There is a deep schism in the MRM between sex-positive and sex-negative MRAs which is well illustrated by how Angry Harry is now treated at A Voice for Men. Angry Harry is a venerable old MRA, a founding father of the movement, and for him to be ostracized like that just for being eminently reasonable is a travesty.
AVfM purports to be an MRA site but is actually a cesspool of feminist filth, where they worship radical feminists like TyphonBlue. She is a particularly nasty promoter of the feminist sex abuse industry including the lie that women are equally culpable for sex offenses. TyphonBlue is so extreme and clueless in her feminist thinking that she even attributes my former rage over celibacy to "processing (badly) some sort of overwhelming sexual trauma from his past." In the feminist worldview, sexual abuse is the only explanation for every perceived problem, and any man who disagrees with feminist abuse definitions must have been abused himself and is in denial.
TyphonBlue, the AVfM crowd and other feminists have a special poster boy for female-on-male "rape" in the former marine James Landrith. I always felt James Landrith was one of the most unsavory characters on the entire Internet, as his advocacy for the expansion of rape law has disgusted me for many years now. Even if he were telling the truth, it is patently absurd to take his sob story of female sexual coercion seriously as rape. The story inspires jealousy in normal men instead of sympathy and Landrith is a hypersensitive outlier to be traumatized by whatever experience he had. Angry Harry says so himself,
Furthermore, even if these particular memories were 100% correct, it seemed very unlikely to me that a 'normal' man would be so traumatised - and remain traumatised even 20 years later - by the incidents described in his article. So, as I said, I groaned inwardly, being somewhat depressed at the thought that false memories and/or 'particularly sensitive' victims were invading one of my comfort zones in cyberspace.
Now it turns out this feminist poster boy is exposed as not only a preposterously sensitive moron but a fraud as well. Angry Harry has caught James Landrith carefully changing his story and relying on recovered memories just like any other feminist accuser of the most untrustworthy kind. Now Landrith even claims, based on memories recovered in therapy, that the woman spiked his drink before "raping" him, making the feminist melodrama complete.
I myself called out the female sex-offender charade several years ago. To me, nothing screams bullshit as loudly as claims of sexual abuse by women. I have emphatically stated that women cannot rape men nor sexually abuse boys. I regard it as crucially important for MRAs to make it perfectly clear that we do not acknowledge female sex offenders even in principle. It was clear to me from the beginning that the female sex-offender charade only serves to promote feminist sex laws that ultimately hurt men immeasurably more than it can help a few rare particularly sensitive outliers who are traumatized by female sexual coercion (if they even exist). It is unreasonable to make laws based on hysterical outliers, and most importantly, the laws they want correspond exactly to the most hateful feminist sex laws which hurt innocent men every day. Therefore, I cannot emphasize enough that anyone supporting the female sex-offender charade is not a true MRA. This is a very good test to separate the wheat from the chaff -- ask how someone feels about female sex offenders, and if they respond that male victims of women are marginalized and female sex offenders need to be prosecuted more vigorously (or at all), then they are most certainly not one of us.
The word for such people is feminist or mangina. And now I've got some bonus advice for manginas: If you want to be sex-negative, then there are ways to go about it without catering to the feminist abuse industry and without advertising how stupid you are. For someone brought up in a feminist milieu this might be difficult to grasp, but guess what -- there are ways to prohibit and punish undesirable sexual activity without defining it as "abuse" of some helpless "victim." Traditional moralists have done so for millennia. One example is Islamic sharia law. Another is traditional Christianity and our laws against adultery, fornication, sodomy and so on in place until recently. Even obscenity can be dealt with on grounds of morality rather than the hateful and ludicrous persecution of "child porn" we have now, where teenagers are criminalized as sex offenders for sharing "abuse" pictures of themselves. A blanket ban on obscenity such as in the old days would be infinitely better and more fair than this charade. I don't agree with the sex-hostility of traditional morality either, but at least it isn't as retarded as the false-flag MRAs who apply feminist sex abuse theory to males. So if you want to be taken seriously, it would serve you better to advocate for traditional moralist values and laws instead of the feminist sex-abuse nonsense.
When a boy gets lucky with an older woman such as a teacher, quit insisting he was "raped" or "abused," because sexual abuse is not what is going on here. Forcing these relationships into a framework of "rape" or "sexual abuse" designed for women only serves to showcase your lack of intelligence and ignorance of human sexuality. It is also not needed in order to proscribe such behavior if you really believe it needs to be a criminal matter. You can punish the woman (or both) for fornication and/or adultery if you insist on being so sex-hostile. No victimology is needed! No denying the boy got lucky and ludicrously attempting to define him as a "victim." No sucking up to the feminists and no display of extreme imbecility on your part.
I can't really argue with moralism, because it basically consists of preferences about what kind of society you'd like to live in or claims about the will of some deity. It is not in the realm of rationality, so beyond simply agreeing or disagreeing, there isn't all that much to say. But when you make claims about abuse and victimhood like the feminists do, those claims can be tested because they bear relation to the real world and human nature, which is what science is about. Thus scientific methods such as is employed by evolutionary psychology can greatly illuminate the nature of rape and sexual abuse, and whether women can be perpetrators, and it can easily be shown that feminist jurisprudence makes thoroughly unscientific claims. Feminist sex law is neither based on evidence, rationality nor morality and should not be taken seriously. It is mere pseudoscience concocted to justify an ulterior motive. If you still insist on it, you are left with pure absurdity, as is easily demonstrated by a simple thought experiment.
Feminist sex abuse is so arbitrarily defined that if you are blindfolded and transported to a random jurisdiction where you meet a nubile young woman, you would have to consult the wise feminists in the local legislature before knowing if you can feel attracted to her without being an abuser (or even a "pedophile" if you are utterly brainwashed). And if you see a romantic couple, you similarly cannot know if the younger one is being "raped" without consulting the feminists you admire so much. That's how much faith manginas place in feminists -- they allow them to rule their most intimate desires and defer to them unquestioningly. Manginas are feminist sycophants and the MRM is now full of them in places like AVfM, The Spearhead, and the Men's Rights subreddit.
What is going on is this. The manginas are so steeped in feminist propaganda that the only tool in their intellectual toolbox is "abuse." And so in Western countries, even conservatives and religious fanatics (barring Islamists) will only ever argue that any type of sexual activity needs to be banned because it constitutes "abuse." Old concepts of sin or crimes against nature/God have been almost entirely supplanted by the feminist sex "abuse" paradigm. In terms of "abuse" is now the sole means available to conceptualize anything you disapprove of regarding sexuality, so everyone, including devoutly religious people, jumps on the bandwagon and promotes the politically correct abuse industry. Even prostitution is now to be legislated exclusively in terms of sexual exploitation or "trafficking" of (mostly) women -- traditional morality does not enter into it and of course all whores are themselves only innocent victims while the johns are the abusers. Feminists and manginas simply cannot help themselves because they know no other morality after a lifetime of being exposed to feminist propaganda. Feminist theory is so pervasive, any alternative is literally unthinkable for liberals and conservatives alike these days. This is how you get the bizarre charade of putting women on trial for "raping" willing and eager 17-year-old boys. Prosecuting female sex offenders is the most comical and perverse legal charade in history, yet false-flag MRAs support it along with the feminists because they have been that well indoctrinated with feminism. Brainwashing really works. Last night I got a comment from a true believer which well illustrates the profoundly obtuse mindset of a male feminist:
if he says no, it is rape. if he is forced, it is rape. if he is under the legal age, it is rape and child molestation. plain and simple. same laws for all...and if women want to enjoy the privileges of modern society, they must be held accountable under the same laws and to the same degree.
Such blind devotion to feminist sex law is the hallmark of a mangina. They neither comprehend that men and women are different, nor do they see anything wrong with these hateful sex laws when applied to men either. Instead they unflinchingly support equal injustice for all. We real MRAs need to denounce these fools. Don't be led on by these impostors who claim to be on men's side while promoting the very worst aspects of feminism. Rest assured that real MRAs are not like that and we do exist. The real MRM will trudge on despite our depressingly small size at the moment.
Perhaps in 30 years time even feminists will be so happy, waking up each morning and being fucked by their king kong sex robots with their 20? power drill black penises, that they won’t care if millions of men are doing similar with their perfect nubile 16 year old Anna Kournikova silicone replicants. Unfortunately, women aren’t psychologically satisfied by the satiation of their physical sexual needs in the way that men can be. They will still feel threatened’ and insecure by the ready availability to men of female beauty and youth. They will still want to take a legal hammer to those Anna sex bots, no matter how many electric black cocks they themselves are being happily serviced by.
Ephebophilia (or hebephilia’) is a word commonly bandied about online by individuals wishing to differentiate between men (like themselves), who are attracted towards underage teenagers, and paedophiles’ who are sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. Of course, the media, and the legal system, makes no such distinction. However, many who would champion the right of men to have sexual relations with girls currently under the age of consent feel strongly that if this distinction was more widely known and accepted then it could facilitate a more reasonable public discussion on the age of consent and the laws and punishments relating to sex with teens. Paedophiles are evil perverts and beyond the pale, but ephebophiles? Well, they are not so very different from the average red-blooded man they just like their women a little bit younger. Yes, they are suffering from a clinical disorder, as paedophiles are, but it’s not so harmful and they are a lot closer to the normal spectrum than subhuman paedos.
So is ephebophilia a real thing? Does the concept serve any useful purpose in the context of the feminist war upon male sexuality and age of consent issues in particular? And am I just as much as a hebo as some of my former readers who have championed the label in the past, such as Human Stupidity?
As regulars will know, I’ve made a point of strongly disavowing the very idea of ephebophilia. There are two good reasons for this.
Firstly, my experience of ephebophiles’ both here and elsewhere online. Self-identified ephebophiles tend to be universally 1/ clearly autistic 2/ tactically clueless 3/ prone to paedocrisy and even 4/ Left-Wing and pro-feminist (obviously some exceptions, such as HS) and certainly anti-misogynistic’.
To put it bluntly, based upon my experience, such people are worse than useless in the fight against the Sexual Trade Union. I’d rather go into battle against an Isis horde with only a dozen disabled, pacifist, transgenders alongside me than these creepy ephebophiles’. Hell, I’d rather take on a handful of Russian Ultras with a thousand English football hooligans to back me up. That’s how pathetic these aspie hebos are when it comes to the street fight we are all in.
Secondly, I see no strategic advantage whatsoever in embracing the label of ephebophilia. Hebos’ are so clueless that they really do believe, in their aspie naivety, that the same hysteric mobs who burn down the homes of pediatricians will take kindly to a group defining themselves by a slightly different Ancient Greek term meaning perverted love of underage girls with hair and perky breasts’.
Of course, this isn’t quite fair. Ephebophilia means love of youth’ (form the Greek word for youth hebe’). And the attraction to young post-pubescent girls is indeed normal. The point is, to paedohysterics, a word doesn’t change a thing. David Futrelle, child snuff porn apologist and paedocrite that he is, is right to mock the idea that it could win over’ feminists or the paedo hating population at large. In fact, it could make things very much worse. I have spoken here before of the fact that shows like To Catch a Predator’, and anti-paedophile’ vigilantes such as Stinson Hunter, nearly always target men who are trying to have sex with girls only a little under the age of consent. They never try to entrap real perverts and child molestors.
The reason why we have this insane moral panic over paedophiles’ is not because perverts who molest 5 year old children are hated. It’s because society hates and fears even more the normal men who break age of consent laws by having sex with nubile young teens. Paedocritical men are shouting at the bulge in their pants at the thought of climbing into bed with a sexy 14 year old, and all the legal consequences that would follow for them, and paedohysteric woman (and feminists) are shouting at the millions of men who would not even hide the bulge in their pants and openly pursue teenage girls if it wasn’t for the law, the shaming, and the feminist induced hysteria over paedophilia’.
It is true to an extent that establishing the concept of ephebophilia in mainstream discourse would help to clarify what real paedophilia is and isn’t. Real paedophilia is a psychological perversion involving the sexual preference for pre-pubescent children (in today’s USA, that means girls under the age of 10 or so). But at the same time, I see absolutely no advantage in replacing one clinically defined pathology with another. Anti-feminism is the fight against the feminist suppression and pathologizing of normal male heterosexuality. It is normal for men to be sexually attracted to females who have started puberty and who have the maximum number of fertile years ahead of them.
Ephebophile activists believe they can identify themselves as a group and fight for and eventually win their sexual rights, just as gays (supposedly) did. No they can’t. However, MEN can perhaps reclaim their sexual rights against feminists. Only normal, heterosexual MEN can win in the fight against the war on male sexuality.
With all this said, however, I wouldn’t be honest not to add my own personal experiences over the last couple of years, and describe how they have perhaps enabled me to look at the ephebophile question’ in a new and more nuanced light. For some time I’d largely given up on dating. I was getting older, I was still introverted and awkward around the opposite sex, and in any case, as the Anti-Feminist’ I saw all women as rapists, every one of them limiting male sexuality in order to futher their own selfish sexual ends. Walking down the street and smiling at a pretty jailbait as an act of defiance was the limit of female involvement in my world.
For over two years now I’ve been spending the majority of my time in Eastern Europe. As most readers accept here, Slavic women are much more feminine and better looking than their Anglo counterparts, with Russians at the very apex of the female beauty pyramid. Furthermore, they age rather differently too. Yes, of course any normal man would be attracted to even an average Russian 15 year old girl, but the Manosphere Myth’ that I’ve criticised here in the past regarding peak fertility and women reaching their maximum attractiveness at 21-25 isn’t so implausible when you constantly see such stunningly beautiful long legged slim women in their early twenties all around you.
In Eastern Europe I don’t get the achingly painful sense of regret at seeing a pretty 14 year old girl and thinking that by the time she is legal, she will already be losing her youthful charm and beauty. The fact is, in the UK, and even in countries such as France and Germany, the majority of girls are burnt out, bitter, overweight slags by the time they reach 18. Because of diet, lifestyle, and genetics, even pretty 14 year olds do start to lose it by the time they are off to university. In Eastern Europe, puberty arrives a little later, lasts longer, and everywhere you turn there are 20 year old women who are ravishingly beautiful, have perfect skin, possess the long slim legs of ballerinas, and who wear elegant fashions with a graceful air.
Furthermore, I’ve fallen in love with at least a couple of such specimans. One of them is now 26. I have seen photos of her when she was a teenager and the curious thing is she didn’t look anything special even at 17. By 21 she was modelling, and even now as she approaches her 30’s, I get jealous looks constantly when I am with her, even in a city where HB8s are the norm. Even the likes of Krauser PUA would give me a nod of respect if he saw me with her. Look closely and she has crow feet developing around her eyes. Her skin is no longer perfect. But if I could re-wind time I would not wish her any younger than 21. And it’s not down to make-up either. I have seen her without, and she is still beautiful, and more beautiful than she was when she was a schoolgirl.
Another of my girlfriends is 20, and very pretty. She still looks like a teen, and even behaves like one in many ways, though thankfully more in a cute than insufferable manner. Although beautiful, I do not recieve so many jealous looks when I am with her as when I am with the woman who is a good deal older. This girl, I only met recently. I have seen photos of her when she was 18, and she looked almost perfect. I would have liked to have known her then, and I would still not object to a girlfriend such as her who is 16 or 17. However, in Eastern Europe the age of consent is not such a weighty issue given the mass of beautiful females aged above even 18. And this is probably why paedohysteria is primarily an Anglo-Saxon phenomenon.
So in the light of my experiences, how would I finally appraise ephebophila’? As to whether it is a real thing, I am both more and less inclined to say yes. Despite my disavowal of the term here in the past, I somewhat suspected that I might be a little different’ to the average man. Not just in being honest about attraction to young teenagers, but perhaps more strongly attracted than most. Although partly right, I think I had simply fallen into the same mistake that I’d rightly accused self-identified ephebophiles of making. The honesty to accept that teens are attractive can lead you to identify yourself, even subconsciously, as somebody who is attracted to teenage girls’ and different to other men, and to somewhat ignore the charms of slightly older females. And this is compounded by the disgraceful state of femininity in the Anglo-Saxon world, a world in which the only feminine and loveable girls left are indeed mostly under 18.
If ephebophilia exists, therefore, it is not a clinical disorder, such as real paedophilia is, but rather a situation in a man’s life brought about by feminism and the state of women in the Western world.
And as a badge, it’s still tactically clueless and aspie.
My experiences of falling in love have also altered somewhat my views on normal male sexuality’ in the sense that I now give more value to the merits of sex within a loving relationship. Of course, I am not now claiming that the female monogamous system is right’ for men. I am currently in love with two beautiful women, and I think I have emotional room left for a couple more as well, hehe. All I’m saying is I no longer mock the notion of love, and that sex with love is, after all, something that every man should be able to experience as part of a happy life. I also look at porn less, and so I have to admit, I am closer to Eivind Berge’s view that real relationships are better than fapping. However, I still feel that he doesn’t understand the dangers of giving the slightest credence to feminist arguments against porn. And also, not many men can have girlfriends as good looking as his, and not many men approaching 50, as I am, can walk down the street with a beautiful 20 year old, or a HB9 26 year old, as I can. Porn never stopped me having relationships. Rather, it was a life-saving substitute in fallow times. It also helped to keep the flame of desire alive as I sank into middle-age.
And that thought leads nicely onto a final word regarding my contribution to men’s rights activism and the lack of updates on this blog. Yes, I am in some ways happier and more content than before, and therefore no longer feel the need or have the desire to carry the stress and time commitment of regularly posting articles here. It’s also true that I certainly no longer feel any personal pain at current age of consent laws. I would certainly be satisfied forever more at having relationships with beautiful Slavic girls aged 16 above, or even 18 above. But this certainly isn’t the reason for my lack of involvement in men’s rights. I still maintain that the age of consent’, or more correctly, all the many issues that revolve around it, as part of the wider assault upon male sexuality by feminists, is the leading men’s rights issue. But perhaps I am less inclined to maintain this site, just when I am finding some happiness and sexual satisfaction, to cater to disloyal self-identified ephebophile readers such as the likes of Jon or Human-Stupidity, themselves prone to paedocrisy whenever it suits them.
The KKK were never really a hate group anyway.I've seen many whites being lynched by the Klan for committing a serious crime.Hell,i've even heard of stories where if a white guy was beating his wife,he could expect the Klan on his lawn in the early hours of the morning ready to beat the cr*p out of him.
They were really nothing more than a religious group who were the unofficial police force.I've also read that the police heavily relied upon the Klan to bring justice in society during the Klan's heyday.
Didn't blacks also go to the KKK to sort out their problems in their neighbourhood?
Also, I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of paedohysteria today is generated by the fact that unmarried nubile teenage daughters are in the family environment, dressing slutily, for up to 8 years before they finally go off to university. It’s about father coming to terms with the bulge in his pants when his little princess bends over for the tv remote wearing her see through leggings and thong. For most of history, girls began puberty at 13 and were quickly married off. Having post pubescent daughters stay with their natural fathers without even having the mother to keeep an eye out or satisfy him sexually is likely going to lead to a huge increase in incest I would have thought.
@anonymous you seem to miss the point of the article. If finding teenage girls was immoral, then it would not be my business to promote immorality here. However, given your lack of arguments as to why it should be wrong, then a clearer reason is presented as to why society (through feminism) holds it to be wrong female sexual jealousy.
Secondly, if we are hardwired to find young females to be attractive, it is because the genes of those who found young nubile girls attractive (and indeed acted upon that attraction) predominate in the population. In other words, you are here today to write such crap because your ancestors fucked young girls, throughout our evolutionary history. If there was something about such sexual relationships that left teenage girls psychologically harmed and compromised in their ability to function as mothers (and bear more children) their genes would not have survived. The idea that there is something inherent in a sexual act between young girl and older man that would leave her damaged is a feminist fiction that has no basis in science or empirical study.
And don’t give this shaming canard of we are not monkeys’. It is you and your feminist scum sisters who are the monkeys unable to divorce sex and your own broodmare needs from morality and in fact reifying your most basic and primitive physical needs and desires.
Of course, all this begs the obvious question how “fictional” Hidden Figures really is.
Contrary to myth, America was already thoroughly race-whipped when NASA was in its heyday. For example, a Washington Post reportorial entitled “Racism, Sexism, and Space Ventures” back in November 24, 1973, was a stereotypical lament that NASA lagged behind other federal agencies when it came to employing non-whites
Black leaders were intensely critical. As man was about to land on the moon, the black magazine Jet was condemning the space program for using money which could be better spent on welfare programs for blacks. [Blacks Scarce as Men on Moon at Launch, by Simeon Booker, Jet, July 31, 1969]
Not to be outdone, Ebony magazine published an editorial comparing white men going to the moon to Columbus’s voyage to the New World, which led “to one of the most infamous and long lasting rapes of all history” [Giant Leap for Mankind?, Ebony, October 1969]
On July 16, 1969, Ralph Abernathythe heir to Martin Luther King’s civil rights shakedown machinerode a mule cart, with three mules, along with 150 other poor black people to protest NASA’s launch to the moon. [Protesters, VIPS Flood Cape Area, by William Greider, Washington Post, July 17, 1969]
Even Time and Newsweek were upset by the lily-white nature of the moon launch. Time, for example, asked “Is the moon white?”
In long run, these black leaders got what they wanted. America gave up exploring the heavens to spend untold trillions pretending race didn’t exist.
Now, we are expected to fall on our knees to praise the obviously inflated contributions of three black women canonized in a film which has already won a Screen Actors Guild award and will no doubt win an Academy Award.
Hidden Figures was made with the painfully-obvious agenda of delegitimizing the contributions of white scientists, physicists, engineers, mathematicians, project managers, aviation experts and rocket scientists. Instead, America’s greatest triumph evidently hinged on unknown black women manually calculating trajectories already confirmed by computers and a white man named Jack Crenshaw.
But even in 1969, NASA and the federal government would have been proud to show off any black contributions to the moon landing. By highlighting black contributions to the Apollo program, NASA could have kept blacks from singing songs like Gil Scott-Heron’s “Whitey on the Moon” (which bemoaned how a rat could bite the black singer’s sister while white people were on the moon).
But this didn’t happen.
Why didn’t someone from NASA bring up Katherine Johnson back then to counter this negative publicity?
Simple. Her contributions were so insignificant no one with NASA noticed them enough to highlight them.
Which is why Hidden Figures matters and must be lavished with awards and praise. It creates a new narrative, completely devoid of truth, about black participation in man’s greatest achievement even in the face of discrimination. And it’s a narrative that a certain audienceit should be noted women made up 64 percent of the opening weekend audience, with minorities representing 57 percent of those seeing the filmwant to hear [Hidden Figures cast celebrates as film hits No. 1, by Joey Nolfi, Entertainment Weekly, January 9, 2017].
Yet surely audiences wanted to believe it in 1969 as well. Katherine Johnson, were her contributions so vital, could have been the much-needed minority public relations asset to parade around to the media back then.
But her value as a symbol was limitedbecause her contributions were trivial.
And she can only be brought up now because the real truth about black opposition to the space program has been hidden in plain sight.
[A transcript of Matt Forney's speech at the recent Identitarian Ideas IX conference]
I don’t think I need to remind anyone that the election of President Donald Trump was a turning point in American and European history. For our entire lives, our overlords in the government and media have told us that we were on the losing side of history. That we were destined to fail. That the future of our civilization was rainbows, unicorns and chocolate chip cookies, fruits Frenching their boyfriends in front of empty churches, neon-lit mosques eclipsing the cities our forefathers labored to build, and finally, being finessed out of our neighborhoods by swarthy foreigners who stare at our sisters, wives and girlfriends the way lions stare at gazelles.
But for now, the arc of the moral universe has been redirected.
The arc of the political universe has also been redirected. One of the most important achievements of the past two years has been the total destruction of the mainstream American right-wing. My friend Edwin Oslan calls them “Conservatism, Inc.,” the alt-right calls them “cuckservatives,” but regardless of how we abuse them, they were the primary impediment to real, nationalist change in the West. It is they, not the left, who are the biggest losers in the age of Trump. Right now, the left is so excited about the prospect of “resisting” the President that they almost seem sexually aroused by it. It’s your National Reviews, your Weekly Standards, your Rick Wilsons and Rich Lowrys and rich finks in general who have lost everything in the God-Emperor’s ascent.
I’m not just talking about the neocons, the loudest, yappiest poodles echoing in the cuckservative kennel. There’s a whole world of inanity beyond the armchair quarterbacking of soft, pudgy Manhattan intellectuals renaming French fries to “freedom fries” or calling on poor men’s sons to fight their wars for them. Mr. Trump has helped sledgehammer the foundations of American cuckservatism, and we are now dancing among the ruins.
A common refrain during the election was that Donald Trump was not a “true” conservative. The myth of the post-National Review right-wing in America is that the United States was intended to be a different society than the nations of Europe, one bound not by blood and soil but by the liberties granted by the Constitution: the proposition nation. In the minds of the geldings who believe this myth, such as, for example, the guy at CPAC who denounced us as “left-wing fascists” a couple of days ago, Trump and the alternative right are a rejection of these core American values, a return to the bad old days of European nationalism, endless war and diminutive Austrian men with funny mustaches.
The problem with myths is that they have a bad habit of being false. The proposition nation so beloved of William F. Buckley and Norman Podhoretz is nothing but Saran wrap stretched over the casserole of white America. While it’s true that the Constitution represented a break from the European tradition of monarchy, the ideals that fueled the American Revolution were derived from Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and implemented by Americans of European descent. Without Europe’s peoples or its philosophies, there is no Constitution, there is no right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and there is no United States of America.
The “golden age” of immigration to Ellis Island, so beloved of cucks and leftists and a fundamental underpinning of the proposition nation myth, is itself a crock of garbage. As Jim Goad detailed in his book The Redneck Manifesto, during the 19th century, corporations lobbied the U.S. government to bring in Italians, Chinese and other foreigners to break the backs of labor unions and lower wages for the average worker. The lie that immigrants do the jobs that Americans don’t want to do has a far longer history than you think.
But myths cannot take root unless they contain some truth. You may not believe that Jesus Christ died for your sins, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the Romans didn’t nail him to the cross. Similarly, while the U.S. is hardly a proposition nation, bound together only by the Bill of Rights, its history as a colonial state has kept white Americans from forming a cohesive, rooted culture.
Rare are the Americans who are so attached to their hometowns that they don’t want to leave them. Packing your bags and moving to another state, even if it’s on the other side of the country, is as American a tradition as sportsball and diabetes. From the settlement of Jamestown and the landing at Plymouth Rock to the Louisiana Purchase to the California gold rush to the rise of the Sun Belt in the 1950’s and sixties, if white Americans didn’t like where they were, they went somewhere else. I know that when I was a kid, I dreamt of nothing more than getting out of my hometown of Syracuse, New York, that decaying Rust Belt ghetto midway between New York City and Toronto.
People who are constantly moving from point A to point B cannot put down roots and develop a sense of self. In fact, recent scientific research has shown that the brains of those who live in the same place their entire life develop far differently than those who migrate to new locales. White Americans never developed a unified sense of who they are because they’ve never stayed in one place long enough for the question to come up. And that’s before we get into mass immigration, media propaganda and the other myriad ways that cultural Marxists have tried to destroy the spirits of white Americans.
Now, we do have strong regional identities: as explained in the book Albion’s Seed, the United States was settled by four distinct groups from the British Isles, and our politics and culture is in many ways a continuation of the struggle between the Cavaliers and the Roundheads during the English Civil War. But no singular white consciousness has ever existed in the U.S. Ask a Swede, a Pole, or a Hungarian who he is and what his nation means to him, and you’ll get concrete answers rooted in cultural memory going back centuries. Ask the same question of an American and you’ll quickly find out that there’s no “there” there. At the moment, mindless consumerism is the only duct tape holding the U.S. together.
So, yes, the cucks havehada glimmer of a point: as a settler state of European mutts, the U.S. was not merely an extension of its fatherland. But that has come to an end, not because of Donald Trump or the alt-right, but ultimately because of the left themselves.
Years ago, when I was skeptical of white advocates and tribalism, I wrote on my old blog In Mala Fide that a political movement like the alt-right would never work because whites in the U.S. don’t define themselves by their whiteness, unlike blacks. A reader of mine interjected by saying that whites have already been defined as white, in the negative, by the left. And he was right.
To be white is to be the world’s whipping boy. It means being blamed for everything from poverty in Africa to environmental degradation to women not having enough space to sit down on the subway. It means being told to shut up and sit down, that your opinion is worthless because of your “privilege,” and that the eventual disappearance of your people and culture is a sign of progress.
To be white, straight and a man is even worse, because you’re told that your natural masculine instincts, your natural desires to bed and wed women make you an oppressive misogynist. In 21st Century Parody World, six-year olds are allowed to take dangerous hormones so they can become a funhouse mirror version of the opposite sex, but not asking your wife for permission before you kiss her can land you in prison for rape. And if you’re not happy with this arrangement, you’re expected to sate yourself with degenerate Japanese cartoons and pornography, the bread and circuses of the globalist empire. That’s how mad the Marxists are: they don’t merely want to destroy our culture and identity; they want to destroy the very things that make us human.
Sun Tzu stated that when you have surrounded your enemy, you must give him a way to escape, or else he will fight you to the death, having nothing to lose. The left never learned that lesson, because they’ve pursued whiteswhite meneverywhere they’ve gone, leaving them no quarter and no place to call their own. Even video games, long the province of virginal nerds, were not safe, which is what sparked the GamerGate movement three years ago, the first successful backlash against cultural Marxism in most of our lifetimes. The white men of gaming saw leftists trying to subvert their favorite hobby, one they retreated to after society rejected them, and said no more. Enough. This line you shall not cross.
It was this spark that ignited the pile of TNT that was the Trump campaign and the alternative right. The average Trump voter isn’t explicitly aware of all the issues that we are versed in. They don’t know everything that we know. But they know, deep down, that something is wrong. They know that fifty years of mass non-white immigration and globalist free trade have ruined them financially and placed their lives and that of their children in peril. And they see, day in and day out, the chattering classes tell them that they are the problem. They see liberal arts dilettantes in Brooklyn brownstones, rent paid courtesy of Daddy’s credit line, banging out “thinkpieces” every day claiming that all the world’s ills are thanks to those stupid white rednecks in Kentucky, Michigan or Pennsylvania, and as soon as they kick the bucket and give way to all these newcomers from Mexico, we’ll be all better off.
White Americans saw this repulsive display and they said no more. Enough. This line you shall not cross. And they turned out to support a champion who would fight for them. Donald Trump is the first politician in years who treats white Americans as a group with interests of their own, interests that are worth defending. While he is far from the alt-right ideologically, Trump’s nationalist presidency is aiding the maturation of white America from an empty, consumerist frontier into a people with an identity of their own, one that runs deeper than pop culture effluvia and waxing autistic about “muh Constitution.”
I’ll end with an interesting anecdote.
Over the past few years, I’ve noticed an increasing number of houses in upstate New York flying Confederate flags. Seems absurd on the face of it. Why are white New Yorkers adorning their homes with the flag flown by the Southern rebels that their ancestors fought in the Civil War? After all, you don’t see many Poles flying the Hammer and Sickle, or many Koreans paying obeisance to the emperor of Japan. Then it hit me: the U.S. has become so deracinated and so debauched that rural Northern whites are reaching for any emblem of culture that they can get their hands on, anything that they can call theirs.
To the cultural Marxists, the Confederate flag represents white America, the white America they seek to destroy and replace with foreigners, a symbol that drives them insane with hatred. To rural whites across the U.S., lambasted as the embodiment of everything wrong with the world, the Confederate flag is a gesture of defiance to those who would see them dead and buried. A symbol of implicit white identity, transcending the petty regional differences between North and South, united against the forces of globalism, multiculturalism, and degeneracy.
None of us can say for certain whether this a struggle our people will win. But I can say this: we will not lie down and die either. Regardless of how the next eight years play out, the dragon of white identity has been roused from his slumber, and he’s not going back to bed anytime soon.
As my friend the Bechtloff says, I’ve made my peace with God. Let’s dance.
Whitney Cummings once said, "Porn isn't bad. Men watching porn is like women watching The Food Network: we're both watching things we're never going to freaking do." Feminists led the efforts to ban child pornography in the late 1970s, and will continue trying to demonize men for indulging their curiosity in, or getting aroused by, "deviant" forms of sexuality, and for exploiting women, even as women (especially feminist women, who often are excited by rape fantasies not that there's anything wrong with that) indulge in their own violent, sadomasochistic pornography by reading Fifty Shades of Grey. It's hypocritical and a double standard.
Feminists have even gotten porn involving 17-year-old girls declared "child pornography," despite the fact that these girls would, until very recently, have been considered nubile (i.e. of marriageable age), rather than children. It is just another way of shaming men for having normal sexual desires. Young women are at the peak of their fertile years, so it is natural for men to want to have sex with them, and understandable that some men would resort to pornography as a more easily obtainable substitute.
In a way, it shouldn't be all that surprising that some men want to have sex even with girls who haven't reached puberty. There are, after all, men who will have sex with women (e.g. the wife they've been married to for 30 years) who are so old as to be infertile, so why wouldn't there be men who would have sex with girls who are too young to be fertile? It's been theorized that sex serves a number of purposes besides reproduction (for example, giving couples another reason to stay together to raise their children). It doesn't seem all that farfetched that, in the race among men to be the first to get the youngest and freshest girls as they come on the market, some men would end up going so far as to go for prepubescent girls, erring on the side of too young rather than too old.
There's also Rule 34, "If it exists, there's porn of it"; for whatever reason, the human mind seems to have a limitless ability to fetishize anything. "Normal" people download videos of bukkake and Roman showers, yet somehow child porn is deviant? These distinctions are political, not scientific. As Darian Meacham's Medicine and Society, New Perspectives in Continental Philosophy notes, "Immediately after the APA board's decision to delete homosexuality from their manual, Irving Bieber publicly asked Spitzer whether he would consider deleting other sexual deviations from DSM, too. Spitzer answered: 'I haven't given much thought to [these problems] and perhaps that is because the voyeurs and the fetishists have not yet organized themselves and forced us to do that'."
It also shouldn't be too surprising that some men are attracted to young boys. According to the Super Gay Uncles Theory, one reason for homosexuality's existence might be so that there are extra men around to provide nurturance to children in their extended families. Wouldn't pedophilic desires for boys tend to create an incentive to provide even more nurturance, as a form of child grooming (which some pederasts have likened to heterosexual dating, in which the wealthier older man pays for the dates)? This is the basic thrust of the classic essay, The Descent of Chester.
JFK’s assassination was supposed to happen in Chicago, not Dallas
Chicago was originally where Kennedy was to be assassinated. Had the plan succeeded, Thomas Arthur Vallee would have been the famous alleged assassin whose name would be remembered forever, rather than Lee Harvey Oswald.
On November 2, 1963, Kennedy was set to appear at the Army/Air Force football game in Chicago at 11:40 a.m. At the Chicago Secret Service Bureau, Special Agent in Charge Maurice Martineau informed agents about reports of assassins on October 30. Martineau was repeating a tip from the FBI, in which an informant identifying as “Lee” talked about a four-man sniper team of “rightwing para-military fanatics” with high-powered rifles, who would shoot at Kennedy as his motorcade was driving from O’Hare down the Northwest Expressway, around a slow loop off the highway exit of what is now ironically known as the JFK Expressway.
The tip from “Lee” wasn’t the only one. A landlady at a Northside boarding house called the FBI after she saw four men check into the house, each with a scoped rifle, and carrying a map of Kennedy’s motorcade route. The FBI then called the Secret Service office in Chicago, who searched for the riflemen. Two of the would-be assassins were found and detained for several hours for questioning, while the other two got away. The names of the two would-be presidential assassins are still unknown to this day, as the Department of the Treasury, which oversees the Secret Service, mysteriously destroyed all records of the Chicago plot when the Assassinations Records and Review Board asked for them in 1995, more than three decades after the incident.
In the meantime, the Secret Service had to respond to another tip about an ex-Marine named Thomas Arthur Vallee, who had been reportedly talking about shooting the president when he came to Chicago. Vallee was a paranoid schizophrenic, a disaffiliated member of the famously right-wing, anti-Communist John Birch society, collected guns, and was described as a loner. As a Marine in the Korean War, Vallee was injured by a mortar blast, was subsequently committed to several mental institutions, and received full disability benefits from the Veterans Administration. Like Oswald the expat turncoat, Vallee the mentally disabled fit the preferred profile of the lone wolf presidential assassin.
Vallee’s apartment was raided in his absence, and FBI agents found an M1 rifle, a carbine rifle, and 2500 rounds of ammunition. The Secret Service instructed Chicago Police to put 24-hour surveillance on Vallee and “get him off the street.” Vallee was pulled over and arrested by CPD officers Daniel Groth and Peter Schurla on the morning of November 2, as his 1962 Ford Falcon made its way toward the expressway on Kennedy’s motorcade route. The officers cited a missed turn signal as the result of the arrest. Upon seeing a hunting knife in the front seat of the Falcon, they charged Vallee with carrying a concealed weapon, and a search of his trunk yielded 300 rounds of ammunition.
Vallee’s connections to US intelligence soon came out. His New York license plates read 31-10RF. NBC Chicago employee Luke Christopher Hester learned of the arrest and asked Hugh Larkin, his father-in-law, to have a background check done on the plates by his former colleagues in the NYPD. The plates came back “frozen,” meaning that only US intelligence agencies could retrieve the classified information associated with Vallee’s registration.
Officers Groth and Schurla went on to have prominent intelligence careers. Groth led the December 4, 1969, raid on Black Panther leaders Fred Hampton and Mark Clark, who were both assassinated by police. Hampton was just 21, and Clark was 22. The families of Hampton and Clark, as well as Black Panthers who survived the raid, would successfully sue Daniel Groth and local, state, and federal agencies in 1983 for a $1.85 million settlement. While under Oath, Groth admitted that J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI specifically requested the raid on Hampton. Officer Schurla became a high-level intelligence officer at the Chicago police headquarters.
Like Oswald, Vallee also worked on the CIA’s top-secret U-2 planes in Japan. Vallee told investigative journalist Edwin Black that his U-2 work was at Camp Otsu, but that he also helped the CIA train Cuban exiles to kill Fidel Castro at a CIA base in Levittown, Long Island. Oswald did similar work at a CIA training camp in Lake Pontchartrain, close to New Orleans. Vallee worked near a third floor window at IPP Litho-Plate, at 625 West Jackson Boulevard, directly above where the presidential motorcade would pass. Oswald worked on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, in front of where the Dallas motorcade would pass. It isn’t hard to see how the CIA blazed a path for both men to be set up as scapegoats in their elaborate plot to assassinate JFK.
I am 60 years old and spent at least two thirds of my childhood living next to the railroad track in Beaumont ,Texas where on the other side was the Black Quarters, I had rock fights with the residents of that neighborhood for almost five years before school integration started.My father whom was a WWll combat veteran and a very large and extremely muscular man from a family of hard drinking and fighting men was the only White man in a union of all Blacks some 400 strong and he was a Steward.The other Union members (blacks) would place their guns on their laps in front of him whenever he stood up to speak out against something he thought was wrong, and this was during the heyday of the Civil rights movement in the sixties.I learned during those times that Blacks had been programmed to hate whites and would try and intimidate them when possible but were afraid to actually attack us openly. I never met a black male whom wanted to be my friend during those times although some of the mixed light skinned girls showed a physical interest in me but were of course forbidden to me by the unspoken rules of White conduct in those days.It was in the Marine Corps as a grown man that I first met Black men whom actually treated me with respect and one actually fought along beside me in a bar fight in Kenville ,Okinawa. As I get older I meet more and more Black people whom are friendly towards me but as there are a lot more Black people here than before I still believe that the percentages are the same. Whenever White people try to live with or associate with groups of Blacks they are subject to more danger and violence and if I continue to live in the South ,it is only a matter of time before I have to kill one in order to save some stupid White Liberal from being harmed by them . I am no longer in good enough health to physically stop several blacks from beating some one to death, therefore I have to stab or shoot one so the rest will run away ! Avoid the Groid has been my Mantra for almost twenty years and should be yours too.
Everyone with a warrior woman fetish should watch the video, repeatedly, until they get it through their heads that women simply cannot fight men. Too small, too weak, too slow. See the ragdoll-flopping and the way she goes limp? That's from a single punch from a college-age man she assaulted who didn't see her attack coming and clearly isn't a trained fighter. She was lucky she only got a concussion; if he'd aimed a little lower, he'd probably have broken her jaw.
the idea that someone can suffer from a mental illness is pure fabrication. take the example of depression. there is no way of knowing from a brain scan whether someone has depression. this is not a disease. it is a judgment call. people who are deemed gloomy or themselves feel that they are not having fun, seek chemical treatment for their imagined disease. of course they are going to feel better. drugs often make people feel better whether they are stigmatized by labels or not. imo we often forget that life can be difficult, but just because someone does not enjoy life as much as is expected does not make them sick.
there are places in the world where schizophrenia does not exist. if a person labeled schizophrenic went to live there he/she would no longer have schizophrenia. if a person has cancer and they go to to live with another culture they still have cancer. this is because cancer is a real disease. it takes two people to have schizophrenia (a fake disease) but only one person to have cancer (a real disease). to label someone as schizophrenic is akin to claiming their soul has been lost or that they are possessed by spirits.
in our modern western society anything that is deemed deviant (gambling, drug use, too much sex, too little sex etc) is considered a disease and almost anything that is pleasurable is considered a treatment (sex therapy, drug therapy, pet therapy, talking therapy etc). we currently live in a state run medico-religious culture where punishing people for the crimes they have commited is out of favor because poverty is a disease. poverty is not a disease just as being rich is not a treatment. it is a social judgment.
psychiatry is the modern religion where what used to be called sin is now refered to as mental illness. "Ethics: obsolete; superseded by the diagnosis and treatment of disease." - Thomas Szasz
The most important asset a woman brings to a relationship, and which a man has an animal desire for, is sexual access to her body.
The average woman has a considerable advantage over the average man in that nature builds into the average man a greater desire for sexual activity. Consequently the average woman will receive more sexual attention (come ons, glances, etc) than the average man. However, nature doesn't allow women to keep this upper-hand forever: It gives women a number of years (and no more) where they'll be attractive to the greatest number of men they could possibly be attractive to. After this period, the woman is attractive to fewer and fewer men each passing year.
From the ages of 15 to 20, a young woman, on average, is getting more and more attractive. She stops getting attractive at 20, and maintains those looks (if she didn't have any children) for possibly 5 years. And then a gradual decline happens after age 25. Each passing year, she grows attractive to fewer men, until she's in her 50s and basically sexually invisible to nearly all men save perhaps the one who committed to her in the heyday of her youth and attractiveness (the husband she married 25 years earlier). The husband will have "wife goggles" for her because her younger self will have been imprinted on his mind. He will never have trouble seeing the younger woman. However, other men will only see the aging near menopausal woman.
This is why its important for women to make use of their sexual capital and marry early.
The price that women pay for not being burdened with being the ones who have to initiate relationships/make the first move etc is that later on a woman's physical quality degrades such that no one really desires them physically.
Women have an instinctive understanding of all this, which is why they're always limiting the subset of men who they would date to the subset of men who could POSSIBLY find them attractive. For instance, a 42 year old woman will consider dating men in their 40s and 50s, but she won't consider dating men in their 20s or 30s. That's because she knows that for those younger men, she would be competing against late teenagers and women in their 20s and 30s. So she rationalizes her (reasonable) calculation as being a consequence of desiring someone with equivalent/similar life experiences/maturity etc when the reality is that she's simply setting her sights on what she can get.
Let’s face it any female over about 25 generally doesn’t stir things up inside us anywhere near as much as the sight of a a nubile, firm and young teen body does, especially when gift wrapped’ in something fitting her age like a school uniform to make it even one level more tantalizing’
stop being such a wimp and support armed rebellion and revolution.
This is what it ultimately entails. The 1950's style individualism is inadequate to
the (self-appointed) task of fighting the 10th crusade.
The cry of political equality is born of Envy, as the cry of economic equality. The cry of weak, the slothful and deficient men. As there shall always be rich among men, there shall always be rulers among men.
The Church, when it came to power, closed down the pagan temples. She extinguished religious liberty whenever and wherever it attained power. For She is a Ruler. The only difference from a Moslem or a Communist State is that Church is the True Ruler.
Thus why the horror of burning books?. Singer's books should be burned. Church in Her heyday would have burned Singer himself.
I say again, to homeschool is an act of sedition against the State. For the State is not defined by violence (as libertarians falsely) maintain but by reason. And to teach a child to reason contrary to the State is to rear a subversive.
In an interview, Jon Stewart said, "We may not agree on the way [to handle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict], but to compare me to the Jews who helped Nazis? ... Since when does disagreement with the policies of the Israeli government makes you a lesser Jew? It is very rude for other Jews to say things like that.”
“Stewart” is correct on one thing. The Jews who “helped” the Nazis did so because, in their mortal peril, they’d abandoned their moral principles for the glimmer of hope of personal survival. “Stewart” a pampered, self-centered, deluded king of his world is nothing like those wretches in his attacks on the Jewish state and its defenders.
He is incomparably worse.
What “Americans” or “New Yorkers” are left are truly disappearing persons, persons who have lost their eyes. I see no glimmer of life in their eyes.
They are walking zombies whose souls are an empty shell of what once possessed a “Christian” spark. I’m talking about some vestige of the LIFE OF CHRIST either carried in the recesses of a person’s spirit or at least in the blood of inherited Christian genes.
It’s all gone now. I’m a novelty, a spectacle, and nothing more than a figure for a few snap shots.
What does remain in my Street Evangelism and endures is the image of the demon-annihilating Cross I hold high that crushes the adversaries of Christ: Jews who run our media, our academia, our public schools, our cultural discourse.
I’ll die the death of Samson if I can bring a few thousand of them down with me.
Yeah, grass is always greener. Were I taller, I’d feel 100% better knowing that’s one thing I’ll never have to be insecure about haha. I’m a high-tier normie, in my opinion. I’ve had sex with 4 girls and I’m barely 15 so I’m not a cel by any means, and even as a notcel and sitting at 5’10” I can’t help but feel absolutely inferior and just a worse choice than 6 footers. I’m also becoming fatcel, so if I gymmaxx I could probably shoot up and become a chadlite. Where I am is 3 times better than any oldcel could hope for, yet I am so unfulfilled because of my height, I can’t help but feel nothing but fear and sorrow when I imagine how life must be as an incel.
Feels great to know promiscous children stumble in my only santuary for nothing more than a cheap ego boaster. I promise you will never be able to even IMAGINE life as an incel, yet alone a trucel. Count that as a blessing and stick to browsing here frankly. Your fleeting teenage insecurities are our existential crisises, and as such your pity means fuck all to us.