Similar posts

John Hunniades #racist nytimes.com

Africa for the Africans. Asia for the Asians. Arabia for the Arabs, Latin America for Hispanics but of course Europe and historically white countries for everyone.

Every nation has a right to preserve its ethnic and cultural identity except for European ones because as well know Western Culture is just an idea and has nothing to do with its historic people because white identity is just an invention though people being white is clearly a huge problem that we must overcome.

This is the cognitive dissonance we are dealing with.

All of you white liberals are astonishingly stupid and naive to think you will be safe in a future society dominated by non whites or that it would conform to your silly, utopian fantasy. These groups will simply Balkanize and vote their self interest based on ethnicity which is already the case with their disproportionate support for left wing parties.

Even more galling is that most of the boutique socialists commenting here are unaffected by these changes and so while they live in overwhelmingly white communities and send their children to private schools it's working class whites who deal with the consequences of their insanity in the form of displacement, crime, wage stagnation and inflation.

But reasonable people will simply not put up with this nonsense anymore. We have a right to exist, we have a right to preserve our identity. And this corrupt, Neo-Liberal world order will be relegated to the rubbish bin of history where it belongs.

Trueworldtheory #fundie reddit.com

No, this isn't a "the lefties are the REAL racist", but its an interesting thing I noticed among them.

Many leftists, especially those who hate the Alt Right, even the fools lurking this sub trying to downvote everything here, all of them believe that whites are inherently superior. All of them. None of them really believe that whites were EVER equal to other races. Many of them recognize the same racial truths that our ancestors noticed time and time again, but the left has such a pathological mindset that they repress the truth and express a hatred towards that truth. I always wondered how leftists grew to hate white people so much, that their hatred is strong enough to influence even their own perceptions on their policies. It can't just be anti-white propaganda can it? After all, the same leftists can argue that individualism, capitalism, and free speech is evil when they view such concepts under a white male, but then these same leftists will preach that collectivism and identity politics is evil when the Alt-Right whites starting adopting these concepts. Many weak people tend to become far leftists, they seem to have adopted this mentality and show a hatred towards success and the strong, so their hatred of white people may in fact, just be another branch of this general pattern of thinking. Formed by their resentment, insecurity and acknowledgment of whites being superior.

The left inherent belief in white superiority may also be another driving force in why the left deliberately attacks white interest groups far more then black or Latinos or Asians interest groups, despite the fact that many of them exists and some actually exert influence on our politics. It's because they don't take them seriously. Just like me, they probably don't take black nationalist very seriously because they'll never really be able to accomplish their goals, but white nationalism scares them because deep down, they believe that white nationalist can succeed and that the white-ethno state will objectively end up being a good place.
Of course, the left embrace of white supremacy is different from the Alt Right. The left just unquestionable accepts the concept because of their feelings. The Alt Right hardly embraces any real form of "white supremacy", they simply want a white ethno-state. The acknowledgement of "white supremacy" is simply the acknowledgement of objective facts, that whites have played a major role in technological advancements and in building advanced societies. However, the things that whites surpass at are considered "superior", so that's why the left can unironically see white supremacy in anything.

The fact that the left believes in white supremacy is why its so hard to have serious discussion about race with them. They emotionally are unable to. I noticed, people have tried to be rational with these same leftists, pointing out their racial double standards and that they are acting no different from the "racists" they hate, and it simply slips from their back. But the moment you talk about racial differences in IQ, oh now it begins to affect them. Why? Because you are unintentionally confirming their repressed worldview and they are experiencing cognitive dissonance.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Re: Flat earth and seasons

The Sun & Moon rotate around the top, looking down, in a clockwise direction. As the peak summer draws near, the circle gets tighter as it raises higher and slows in rotational speed.

Then, at the summer solstice you can see the sun above the horizon for over 72 hours if you are at the 89th parallel or higher (the north pole is the center).

After the "Midnight Sun," the longest (sunlight) day, the Sun starts its course again with the rotational speed and circumference increasing.

The size of the rotational circle increases, as does the speed to keep the time, or 24 hour day in sync.

How's that for a brief synopsis? If you want to see a video that portrays this, you'll find plenty on YouTube, or just go to Eric Dubay's channel and watch of few of his videos.

Now let the hate flow from those suffering "cognitive dissonance," as opposed to rational critical thinking, aka conspiracy theorist.

"Cognitive Dissonance," is a psychological medical diagnosis of people that attack the Flat Earth theory, because they believe in Captain Kirk, Luke Sky Walker and think that aliens are going to land on a ball earth, that is spinning faster than the speed of sound, and save us from the NWO! LOL!

CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

williamk could win a Comment of the Month with this gem,

Leftism is a solitary female way to think. The physically weak must rely on deception and manipulation. This necessarily includes self-deception where necessary to ease cognitive dissonance.

Leftism appeals to soyboys and solitary females. Strong men rely on natural laws to attain power, well-adjusted women rely on the strong men and those same natural laws.

Females who are alone, or who can only attain a soyboy, will necessarily turn to leftism to navigate the world.

Very useful rules of thumb:

Weakness => Leftism
Strength => Commonsenseism

Ugliness => Leftism
Beauty => Commonsenseism

LSMV men and women => Leftism
HSMV men and women => Commonsenseism

Effeminate men and masculine women => Leftism
Masculine men and feminine women => Commonsenseism

Loveless losers => Leftism
Beloved winners => Commonsenseism

Bitter sluts and cat ladies => Leftism
Loving wives and honored mothers => Commonsenseism

Weak soyboys and the feminists who resent their company => Leftism
Strong men and the women who love them for their strength => Commonsenseism

The socially atomized => Leftism
The socially embedded => Commonsenseism

Conclusion: As a society becomes more female in nature, it becomes more leftist. A feedback loop develops so that increasing leftism pushes society further away from the life-saving masculinity it needs to correct its degenerate distaff course.

williamk, Henry Mueller, PA, among others, produce some of the finest commenting I’ve read on any blog, let alone this one blessed to have so many MAGAminds gathered at one place. I understand this outpost of Love takes some heat for having a mainly hands-off philosophy toward commenter quality control (it is a blog after all, not a forum), but if you have the patience to sift through the food fight debris you can find quite a few diamonds.

PS something I’ve noticed in my travels is that in locales where White leftoid cogdis is highest, anti-Trump fever is hottest. But where White leftoids live basically free of the need to ease any cognitive dissonance, their anti-Trump furor is muted and they tend to cleave to traditional leftist gripes with a focus on class and capitalist predation. I think this has to do with Trump being the Great Clarifier; his raw candor and no-bullshit freewheeling style exposing the lies of our currently ruling orthodoxy act as a pain amplification chamber for leftoids heavily burdened by the task of accommodating their equalist religion to the reality encroaching in every direction on them which belies their religious beliefs.

Bourbon #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Serious] [Analysis] Why people who hate Incels will never change

Incel-hate circles are just female validation circles, the entire reason to post there is to get a reaction from females who seek attention

Why won't they change their minds when presented with proof?:
It's like a Flat earthers mind when you show him the curve of the planet, even though he sees irrefutable proof that he lives on a globe, he will ignore it or call it fake

The same thing happens on incel bullying sites when presented with actual arguments, like the Nazi-racist Chad in my thread who recorded himself having sex and laughing (also he made a youtubers'(destiny) GF cheat)
He also was racist and never got a single harsh insult from the female he was talking to

My post (i tried to dare them to review this to see how they would try and disprove it): https://incels.co/threads/this-is-what-chad-is-doing-rn-it-wont-touch-this.220729/#post-4960043

What they decided to Screencap: View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hmxhe2/incel_superpower_can_tell_race_of_female_just/


Now you might ask, why would they do that? because that single thread alone destroys the sense of their cause and makes all their efforts worthless, it proves that a nazi sympathizer with a shitty (according to them) personality, who hates black people, jews, and is a hitler supporter gets laid effortlessly just because he looks like a chad

This is what we call a Cognitive dissonance, (the persons belief clashing with new information that they received, or already know) Just like Flat earthers, some of their users spend a LOT of time on their "cause", They post all, day screenshotting incel posts and mocking them, so when they're presented with actual proof, in this case that looks matter, it goes against their actions, they also seem to have a feeling that they're better than everyone who is an incel (wich is a side effect of female attention that they get for attacking incels)

They might use the cognitive dissonance argument against us, But the thing is that countless Tinder AND real life Experiments prove them wrong
What they will do to support this argument is cherrypick either lucky and/or rich people, sometimes they might fail in doing that

Let's set Alex jones as an example of said fail (some normie once told me that if a person like alex can do it then so can everyone) (he was implying that Alex is a horrible person in that argument)
If i remember right the man has had two divorces, right now he looks like your average middle aged american, and he's balding
They would say "hey if he can get a wife and he gets laid so can you!"
The problem is that Alex looked like this in his youth:
imageAlso his net worth is somewhere close to 10 Million $


being an incel means you're a male who can't get laid
It's not an ideology
Just like Science isn't an ideology but the flat earthers that i compared in the first sentence say that it's a mason ideology and the jews/illuminati are getting money from the FE conspiracy and are trying to exterminate the "truth seekers"

I have been comparing their actions to the actions of hardcore conspiracy theorists for some time they're almost exactly the same in their logic, the only thing that's diffrent is that others don't have female validation as their goal

Honestly i could make an entire hour long video about this but i'm too high inhib

Mainländer #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Gynocentrism is to men kinda like feminism is to women

I've never ever met or even heard of any woman who was not a feminist, at least mildly. They may even say from their mouths they're not feminists, but when push comes to shove, they'll still accept pretty much everything they can have because of feminism, even if they're Christian and it goes against the bible, even if they know it's an an unjust advantage since feminism is basically about women having the same rights when it's convenient to them but keeping the special treatment women get when it's likewise convenient.

Gynocentrism is kinda the same for men. Sadly, like Ryo once argued, men seem to be designed to have bottom fo the barrel levels of in-group loyalty and just fuck each other over for pussy whenever the opportunity appears. Even here of all places, a forum known for its hatred and resentment towards women, full of men who were fucked over, rejected and ignored left and right by women throughout all their lives, and where people are heavily dicouraged to simp, whiteknight and do other gynocentric behaviors, you still see some gynocentric manifestations from time to time. All men seem to be gynocentric even if very mildly and the vast majority would simp if an attractive girl was in their lives encouraging them to.

For example, the average woman be like "old men who lust after young girls are such lowlives who deserve to be jailed" whereas the average man be like "if it was my daughter, he'd desire to never have been born!". One is feminist and more "left-wing", the other is more macho-like gynocentrist and more "right-wing", but in the end of the day, both are basically the same: women first, fuck men.

Idk man, at least as far as modern society is concern this seems to be case. On the other hand we have some evidence that people in the past appearently didn't think women are really that important.

What happened in the past was just the more right-wing, macho-like scenario I described in the last paragraph. Men would control women and not allow them into male activities, etc, but it was still for gynocentric reasons. This system works much better (and it's the one in the bible as well), but it's still gynocentric.

I find it very interesting how in the bible, men are commanded to love their wives, but women are commanded to OBEY their husbands. Seriously, this is so much wisdom. God knows men and women are different and work differently.

For an instance we know today that in the paleolithic and neolithic that was a huge trend of infancide against newborn girls, kinda like chinese people did during the one child policy.

People who do abortions are usually just atheists who don't believe a fetus is a human life.

@mylifeistrash would certainly have a good comentary to make ITT tbh.

Men are simply too horny

Yeah, I think this is our greatest problem. Women can't understand for their lives how it feels to have so much more testosterone than they do.

VINDICATOR OF YAH #fundie trustchristorgotohell.org

CAUTION: YOU HAVE ENTERED THE TRUTH ZONE!!

Be aware that prolonged exposure to this site may cause the following reactions in your soul/mind/body:
•NAUSEA/VOMITING – this would be the result of DEMONS in your soul/body being dislodged/leaving you as Truth enters in, meaning that you are accepting the Truth rather than the LIES/LYING SPIRITS that you currently have infesting and corrupting your mind/soul/body. Conversely, if you are righteous, you might just want to puke – as Jesus will spue out the lukewarm pukes from His mouth – because of all the Satanic shit that oppresses this world (especially the righteous souls left in it)…cuz it just makes ya wanna PUKE!! (Most of us have accepted and believed LIES for far too long…)
•ANGER – depending on which way you respond to this Truth Zone, you will definitely display anger, however, there are two types of anger. If you are a PROUD, STUBBORN, REBELLIOUS Shit Soul, you will give in to DEMONIC ANGER and act accordingly. Don’t think that your demons will just manifest and not want more to join them: your REBELLION will open spiritual doors to invite even more to infest your soul and pollute the world. On the other hand, if you are a righteous soul, you will display Righteous Anger, the type that Jesus and His Servants displayed/display. Amen.
•HATRED – like anger, hatred comes in two forms: DEMONIC HATE (an actual Function Demon) and HOLY HATE. Again, if you are a Shit-Soul and willingly-infested with devils, your demon(s) of HATE will rise to the surface and manifest. However, if you are a True Bible Christian, this site will invoke and provoke you to HOLY HATRED: hating the evil as God commands. Amen. (Hate the evil and love the good, and establish judgment in the gate, saith the prophet Amos.)
•DISCOMFORT – if you are “uncomfortable” whilst reading this site – GOOD! That is exactly what we aim to do: dislodge you from your Communist Comfort Zone which is antiChrist and full of shit ab initio! This feeling is obviously the weakest of reactions you should experience if you endure our Truth Zone. If you are a True Bible Christian, we pray that you are urged to action as opposed to inaction: we pray that you take the Battle to the gates and become the VINDICATOR OF YAH that you are called to be oh Man of God! (For women that love God’s Law, seek for ways to be an HELP to Men of God, for that is your purpose.)
•EXHORTATION – obviously this reaction will only occur in a soul that is on FIRE for God (or that once was and needs rekindling!).
•SCORNING, SCOFFING & MOCKING – only FOOLS will do this.
•CURSING – if you are righteous, you will curse Satan & his wicked Shit-Souls. If you are a Shit-Soul, you will curse God and His People…and we will break them & return your filthy curses back upon your all-too-deserving heads!
•CONFUSION & COGNITIVE DISSONANCE – while the ultimate aim of any Truth Zone is to provide Light and the Way Out of the Matrix, if you are currently under a strong delusion (because of your refusal to accept the Truth – who is Christ Jesus of Nazareth) or similar swamp in your mind/soul you will experience CONFUSION/COGNITIVE DISSONANCE. You will start to question all that you have been taught and programmed by the Powers That Be (parents, teachers, “authority figures”, politicians, media “talking heads”, etc.) You will begin to wonder: “Can this be true? How can one site contain so much Truth and the world I have been born into contain so much DECEIT, LYING & SHIT???!!! Just who should I trust now to tell me the Truth??”
•FALSE ACCUSATIONS - may spontaneously erupt from your Shit Soul as you seek to justify yourself and your worldlings. The more you FALSELY ACCUSE us (and similar righteous souls), the worse your Hell shall be. Amen.
•PRIDE – Satan was lifted up in PRIDE. PRIDE goes before DESTRUCTION, but humility goes before honour. Your choice.
•SATANIC DESIRE TO BE SATAN’S ADVOCATE – we have seen this all too often. When Truth is presented in a bold and ‘in-your-face’ Way, most souls show their true colours, defending and promoting Satanic Shit from the Pit.
•THREATENING VIOLENCE & ATTEMPTING TO INTIMIDATE – obviously Shit Souls who refuse to repent from their wicked works and devils will try to stop those that shed Light on them and their intentions. God damn such souls. Amen.
•RETALIATION – this is actually a Function Demon and if you give in to it you will open a massive door to invite even more devils of Hell to further possess you.
•PROVOKING TO LOVE & GOOD WORKS – Christians are commanded to do this. Positively provoking one another to LOVE & GOOD WORKS. If you are a True Christian you will be thusly provoked. (I know, these days the word ‘provoke’ is normally used in the pejorative context. Let’s turn the tables and use it righteously for once, eh?:)
•WORLDLY VS. GODLY SORROW – If you are a worldling (not born again by the Spirit of God) you may experience some worldly sorrow…but that only works DEATH. If you a sincere child of God (or a soul that desires to be one) you may experience some godly sorrow for your own sins; this type of sorrow “worketh repentance unto salvation not to be repented of”! May you experience Godly Sorrow. (Remember that Jesus Himself was called a Man of Sorrows.)


For godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of: but the sorrow of the world worketh death. 2Corinthians 7:10
•INTENSE LOVE COUPLED WITH STRONG CRYING - if you have a humble, decent heart, you will receive and ultimately share the Love of God and help heal the brokenhearted as our Lord commands. (Jesus wept. Shortest verse in the Holy Bible. Jesus was/is God in the flesh and fully Man/Son of Man/Son of God. Don’t let others hinder you – like Satan does – from crying unto the Lord. Amen.) May God lead us to – and bring – His needy children to wholeness in Him. HalleluYah!

The SOnic DReamer #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

OMG False Flags/Hoax Events...I figured out the endgame!!!! And its BAD

Uh oh, I am scared now. We MUST fight this!!

Ever since 9/11/2001, we have been hit hard and heavy with false flags and hoax events.

They will continue, since with every new event, there is more and more cognitive dissonance in the public psyche.

There are still many, many terrific blogs, youtube channels, internet radio channels, etc. which investigate these events and report on the events from angles different from the mainstream media.

I used to make videos about Sandy Hook. I eventually gave up. Why? People don't want to know the truth.

Here is my prediction, here is TPTB endgame with these false flags:

They will continue (for 10 years, 15, 20 years, however long it takes) producing these hoax events and report them as real until the truth seekers either give up and become sheeple again, or the truth seekers die off, or the truth seekers are eventually shunned by populace with the aid of the media (ie the media would push the narrative: Conspiracy Theorists are evil, they need to be reported and they need to be committed against their will, for our safety and theirs), etc.

At that point, the populace would be so docile as to never question anything.

Folks, we are almost at that point now!

How many people are brave enough to talk about 9/11 any random day of the week. Trust me, if you value your job or reputation at work, you will not discuss the subject at work. Want to be popular? No chance of that if you are willing to discuss truth and deception.

Imagine that world? Nobody willing to tell the Emperor he has no Clothes?

azn_railroader, Sebhai & deporttrump00 #sexist reddit.com

(azn_railroader)
I guess South Asian "feminists" aren't all that different from their EA and SEA counterparts.
The problem with Asian feminists across the board is that it's white worship and attention-seeking behavior wrapped under the banner of "feminism." They see themselves as wannabe-whites, and have effectively "othered" the opposite sex of their own race and truly believe the toxic, white-invented stereotypes imposed upon us. Therefore, when they see men of their race succeed in dating (especially if being sought after by WF), the cognitive dissonance is too much, and they feel the need to bring us down a peg or two.

(Sebhai)
The only differences is that south asian feminists tend to get rejected by their men which push them to go to whites the same way asian men got rejected by their women which push them to go to white women or other ethnicity.Whereas the asian feminists,they're the one who rejected their own men the same way south asian men often rejected their own women.

(deporttrump00)
Yeah, I've noticed in general that when SA women do date whites or other races its usually cause they are feminist, overweight, ugly, etc and cannot compete for good SA men, so they derive some anti Indian BS in their mind to justify their situation and date some white loser.
In contrast there are all sorts of EA women who slut themselves out for white guys for no real reason at all other than self hatred.

savagesusie #fundie freerepublic.com

The schools are Marxist indoctrination centers and the Media is their reinforcement. These [Occupy Wall Street] mobs are products of books that deconstruct everything good about America and teach them that lies are “truth”: heather has two mommies;homosexual acts are “good”; capitalism is “evil”; feel good, do it; the idea of God is stupid and irrational; Che is a hero; all white men are rapists and oppressors; “colored” people are saints and good.

After years of lies, they can’t think. The ex-KGB in the 70’s said that they have inserted “cognitive dissonance” into the textbooks and after years of listening to the nonsense, it is virtually impossible for them to reason and use logic. That is why Michael Savage has said that leftists are mentally ill....he is right—these people are ignorant and have no foundation of logic and truth—they are irrational. Not only that, their immaturity level is that of a 5 year old.

They have been plied with “self esteem” and overprotectiveness for decades and removed from reality, and, therefore, made into useless crybabies. The men are de-masculinated and the women are taught to hate men and their own nature, bodies and children—so they can kill them. Lenin devised this plan for “useful idiots” and to destroy the natural family. He put in “daycares” and destroyed marriage contracts so the kids would be his alone.....just like mothers now have been conditioned to give up their children for indoctrination centers—forced into “work” that never includes raising and nurturing their own offspring who become easily emotionally manipulated and controlled and led into Marxist ideology. The US adopted Marxist-Leninism in the 50’s. Even established Stalin’s ‘Separation of Church and State’ then.

Mother and Fathers transmit knowledge and morality—and if they are not around 24/7 the institutions do it. They do not even raise their “children” anymore—they have allow the state to do it.

John Stuart Mill stated well over a hundred years ago....if you allow government schools to educate your children....it will make slaves of them. They have no care except for power.

We need government OUT of education and to burn all textbooks...otherwise, we will get more stupid fools like those on wall street and at this museum.

wingmann #fundie moonbattery.com

NEVER forget that the linchpin of the left is HYPOCRISY.

My friends,you need to understand the three-legged stool that is “political correctness”: CD(cognitive dissonance),SI(selective indignation)and ME (moral equivalence).This mental straightjacket allows blacks to insult whites with impunity but reprobates whites who insult blacks.There’s a Congressional Black Caucus, but no Congressional White Caucus,and that arrangement is considered unremarkable.
Gays can press for admission to straight organizations like the Boy Scouts, but those who seek refuge under the first amendment (“freedom of assembly”) are homophobes.
In the press Democrats are lionized and Republicans are reflexively ostracized. Muslims are a protected category, but Christians are fair game.
I could go on but I think you get it.KP.

Seb_darhem #racist reddit.com

[Talking about Asian women with white men]

Girls like her are trash, perfect example of the white man's hypersexualised whore, their minds are owned by whites. They are the group I hate the most, even more than white men. I don't see them as victims of white propaganda and culture like some people do. I have a totally ruthless mentality with them that if they want to behave like whores that is their choice and they should get treated like whores. We cannot afford to favour them, we cannot afford to accomodate them.

We're not a fucking animal charity that takes back white cum drenched fuckdogs and gives them a nice home to live in and shit everywhere. They play the whole nice family girl image because they think we are stupid, many uncle Chans are fucking stupid. But are we going to be fucking stupid?

They are very insecure, because they believe that by sucking white cock they become honourary whites, even though deep down they know they are seen as disposable whores. There is no honour there, her white relatives and friends will snigger and call her dragon lady. Her sons will be virgins and her daughters will be the white man's prostitute. Weak ass mom will create weak ass children.

At the same time when they see an Asian guy demonstrate the independence and mental strength to date other races, she loses her shit because it creates a cognitive dissonance in her whorebrain. She simply cannot believe that what she sees as an inferior race (her own) can succeed despite the Nazi beliefs of American society.

FWIW, I see the offspring from AMWF as being vastly superior in background. Because you know the father is likely to be no fucking sap.

You know, I would not be against naming and shaming these girls to your friends.

Chechar #fundie #wingnut #sexist caesartort.blogspot.com

Earlier this day I wrote in a previous post: “I confess I’ve just re-watched Pride and Prejudice for the Nth time. There’s no question about it. Mores must be forcefully reverted back to the Austen world, where women were kept in their place. Only the feminized western males cannot get it. Women belong to us; not to themselves. They’re Nature’s most precious gift.”

This is a brief exchange between a typical liberal, the atheist Richard Dawkins (doctored photo, above) and a religious conservative, a smart Palestinian Muslim:

Muslim: Fix your women.

Dawkins. Fix your women! That’s not my business; that’s my women’s business.

Muslim: No, no! It is your business. When you take your women and dress them like whores in…

Dawkins: I don’t dress women! They dress themselves!

Muslim: I know but you allow it as a norm to let women on the street dressed like this. What’s wrong on with your society? What’s wrong with the…?

Dawkins could not tolerate more cognitive dissonance and in his video he simply faded out the audio of what the Muslim was trying to tell him.

Fortunately, in an Islamized Europe the Muslims will teach the feminized male how to grow their gonads again…

Andrea Widburg #racist #sexist #wingnut americanthinker.com

Black Lives Matter reveals a generation of damaged straight, white women

The Black Lives Matter movement and the subsequent riots by Antifa, the Democrat party's domestic terrorist arm, have shown Americans what leftism is — an ugly combination of social and government coercion, racism, violence, and anti-Americanism. It's also revealed that the American left has been using American blacks as a vehicle for political power without any regard for actually improving black people's lives. Instead, the left destroys their communities and doubles down on damaging policies.

What few have pointed out, though, is the way BLM protests have revealed the damage that decades of leftist messaging have visited on straight, young, white women. To set the stage, here are some videos of the hysterical young white women who keep showing up in the front row of the Black Lives Matter movement, whether screaming at police, arguing with black people, rioting, or groveling:

White woman yelling at black officers

Those videos are just a fraction of the footage showing frenzied white women taking the lead in BLM. They are deeply involved in this movement and in the ugliest way possible — and therein lies a sad tale of the leftist takeover of straight, white women.

The root problem is that these women are receiving mixed messages that would make even the strongest person go crazy. Beginning in high school, or even earlier, they're told endlessly that they're both victim and oppressor.

These mixed messages make straight white girls distinct from other students. White boys are told they're evil, toxic oppressors of both women and minorities. It's an ugly message, but a consistent one. Boys lucky enough to have countervailing influences shake it off and become the men they should be. The boys who don't have better influences, interestingly enough, become feminized, even if they're not gay, as if trying to escape that awful toxic masculinity.

Meanwhile, everyone who is non-white and/or non-straight, whether male or female, or something else, is told that he, she, or it is a victim. White privilege, racism, homophobia, transgenderism, misogyny — all of them define how non-white and/or non-straight people suffer endlessly at the hands of straight whites.

And then there are the straight, white girls. On the one hand, they're...well, white and straight. That means they are evil oppressors who have benefited unfairly from white privilege. In the morality play that is leftism, they owe the world big-time. On the other hand, they're women, which means men have victimized them from time immemorial to the present.

That relationship with men is made more toxic by the fact that the young women are told simultaneously (a) that, as liberated women, they should be part of the hook-up culture and (b) that, as biological women, they're the victims of all men's rapacious, rapey sexuality. Given these mixed messages, it's no wonder that these confused young women willingly sleep with the guy at night and then accuse him of rape in the morning. Others avoid this confusion by embracing a trendy lesbianism.

These same women are also betrayed by the leftist culture's refusal to accept that motherhood is (a) biological destiny and (b) worthy insofar as creating and raising a human being does give meaning to life.

Once upon a time, women had no life choice other than motherhood. In a pre–free market, pre-industrial world, if one ignores the infinitesimally small number of wealthy women, any search for meaning in life was overwhelmed by the endless struggle to survive. Women didn't have time to compare their lives to men, especially because the men were also fighting for survival against the untamed forces of nature and other men.

With the industrial era and the development of free-market capitalism, things changed. In the West, ordinary people had time for leisure, contemplation, and the search for meaning.

That fundamental change led to the post-industrial, pre-modern cult of motherhood. Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi, who lived in Rome in the Second Century B.C., leaped into prominence. People in the 18th and 19th centuries loved that, when catty friends asked why Cornelia wasn't wearing jewels, she pointed to her sons and said, "These are my jewels."

Today's young women are told to focus on a career. In college, though, they take liberal arts classes that don't prepare them for anything useful but do reinforce their status as both victims and oppressors. They leave college, uneducated and unskilled, which leads them to unfulfilling jobs. At those jobs, they work hard while dating frantically. When they find the right man, they get pregnant, drop out of the job market, and resent their husbands' careers. They take all the energy that was meant for their professional success and pour it into hyper-motherhood and activism. (See those raging Portland moms above.)

None of this is healthy; it is, instead, tragic. Straight white women hate themselves for being white; hate their men for being oppressors; hate their meaningless careers; and, even though they love their children, they hate the seeming meaninglessness of motherhood. This profound cognitive dissonance has finally found its most disturbing outlet in their shrill, existential screams on the streets of the Black Lives Matter protests.

Nathan Ketsdever, Passionate about Critical Thinking & Philosophy #fundie quora.com

“Rationality” as explained on the internetz. One has to understand the opportunity cost of such a view of both rationality and skepticism. No one is being skeptical of skepticism. No one is doubting their doubt. Thats foundational to the theory—if you take it seriously.
Postmodern type deconstruction that doesn’t realize its eaten itself. That is to say its self-contradictory.
The inability to see the limits of skepticism. Skeptics throughout the ages have been faulted for being academic and ivory tower. For instance, Harris’ suggesting life is deterministic, but living like free will (and presumably human dignity, justice, and rights) are real things. Thats a fundamental cognitive dissonance of the highest order.

The assumption that things one can’t see aren’t true, even though one can see and in fact daily rely on their existence is absurd.

The same logic applied to Gravity, Friction, or other forces would be thrown out and this assertion should be thrown out too.

Not to mention, materialism and physicalism fail to understand the human personality fully. Life is more than skin and bones. Life is more than biology, chemistry, and physics. Otherwise, libraries and bookstores would be half their size.

Anyone who thinks Descartes is the kind of skeptic that skepticism that exists on the internet. Descartes deconstructed and re-constructed. There isn’t much of an element of understanding the necessity of re-constructing so we can live our daily lives and survive. Descartes used skepticism precisely to push knowledge and civilization forward—I think therefore I am—helped the cause of pointing to identity rather than navel gazing and ivory tower. Descartes used skepticism to bring extreme forms of skepticism to bear. That is to say Descartes form of skepticism is exactly the opposite in orientation as internet skepticism or modern day skepticism.

If rationality was as reductive as internet skeptics proclaim, we would all be Ayn Rand. The thing is Aristotle viewed logic and rationality through a different lens. And it’s precisely this lens that is the foundation of the Western legal tradition. Reductive forms of logic lost. It not rationality, but reductive rationality, and thats a whole different ball of wax my friend.

The evidence for God is everywhere…you just have to pay attention.

Drumont #sexist dailystormer.name

Re: France: Haji Murders His Sister’s French BF for Being an Unclean Infidel

And this, folks, is one of the many reasons why you shouldn’t get involved with a kebabess.

Mmmmmmm.

As a lifelong Parisian, I must admit I’ve had my fair share of kebabesses. They are everywhere around where I live, so…

Interesting species, from a purely sexual perspective. Our response to tacosluts in the US.

But yeah, you should target those who do not have male family members, or who have already broken up with their families or, at least, whose family members are not involved in some type of thug life/criminal activity (hard to find in their community).

And, that goes without saying, you should never enter in a longtime relationship with a kebabess, or worse, get married to one.

My experience with them is that they are generally highly pleasant once you hit the sack, but a pain when you have to actually “do the things couples do”. Psychologically unhinged, very unbalanced, full of anxieties, it’s as if their brains were trying to live both the Western life and the Muslim life and, as a result, are in a constant state of cognitive dissonance.

Mark Wiegierski #fundie eurocanadian.ca

Although the Polish-Canadian community (called "Canadian Polonia" by Polish-Canadians) is sometimes spoken of as a unity, it is in fact divided into numerous groups and subgroupings, depending mostly on the time of arrival in Canada. Obviously, waves of immigrants have come from much different Polish societies, and have arrived in much different Canadian societies. There have also been minorities among the immigrants whose relations to the Polish-Canadian community have greatly varied, notably Polish Jews. While one of the most stalwart Polish-Canadians was the sociological scholar Benedykt Heydenkorn, author of numerous worthwhile books about the Polish-Canadian community, others had highly negative feelings towards Poland.

The main waves of Polish immigration to Canada could be identified as pre-World War I; interwar; post-World War II; 1956-1979; Solidarity era; and post-1989. Before World War I, Poland had endured Partition (harsh foreign occupation under Tsarist Russia, Prussia/Germany, and the Habsburg Empire) since 1795. Independence was regained only in 1918. The Polish Second Republic fell before the savage onslaught of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (then Hitler's ally) in September 1939 (when World War II began). It is today relatively little-known outside of Poland that a combined total of about five million Christian Poles perished under the genocidal occupation policies carried out by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (the latter occurring especially during 1939-1941, when Stalin was Hitler's ally).

Betrayed by America and Britain at the Yalta Conference, Poland was assigned to the Soviet sphere of influence (to be officially called the People's Republic of Poland) — along with the wrenching displacement of her frontiers in a westward direction. Stalin and his henchmen imposed hard-line Communism on Poland, rejecting the possibility of permitting considerable internal autonomy, which happened (for example) in the case in Finland.

In consequence of the death of Stalin in 1953, the coming to power of Wladyslaw Gomulka in October 1956 essentially "polonized" the regime and moved it away from the harsh, grinding totalitarianism of the Stalin era. The disturbances of 1968-1970 brought Edward Gierek to power, whose economic policies initiated a short period of considerable prosperity. Nevertheless, the election of the Polish Pope in 1978 galvanized opposition to the Communist regime, culminating in the flowering of the independent trade-union movement, Solidarity. On December 13, 1981, Communist General Jaruzelski declared martial law and attempted to crush the Solidarity movement, which went underground. Finally, the impetus of Solidarity was one of the factors that helped to initiate the massive transformations that resulted in the collapse of the Communist regimes in Eastern Europe in 1989. The Polish Third Republic was proclaimed.

The main socio-cultural and political eras in the far, far more placid Canadian history occurring in roughly the same time-frame could be identified (for example) as pre-1867; Confederation to 1965; 1965-1982; 1982-1993; 1993-2006; 2006-2015, and post-2015. These correspond to the adoption of the new flag, and the beginning of the waning of traditional Canada (1965); the arrival of the new Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982); the Mulroney era (to 1993); the Chretien (and Martin) era (to 2006); and the Harper era (2006-2015). As of the 2015 Canadian federal election, the Harper era has come to a close, and the Justin Trudeau era has begun.

The arrival of Polish-Canadians increased the intra-European diversity of Canada. It could be argued that the initial definition of "multiculturalism" in Canada was mostly meant to refer to other European groups, apart from the English and French, especially Eastern and Southern Europeans. That definition has been mostly eclipsed since the 1980s, with the arrival of huge "visible minority" immigration. Today, Polish-Canadians are seen as mere members of a once homogeneously "White Canada."

Although everyone among the various groupings and subgroupings of the Polish-Canadian community may be "of Polish descent" — they in fact have distinctly different self-definitions and cultural preoccupations. Coming from much different Polish societies, and arriving in much different Canadian societies, fundamentally changes the self-definitions and cultural preoccupations of persons, even if they are said to belong to the same ethnic group.

Poles in Canada have mostly failed to establish a line of generational continuity. Thus, while young people continue to arrive from Poland, the young people of the generations born in Canada, are almost invariably lost to Polishness. There does not seem to be a strongly-active and more intellectual forum or setting or context where a dynamic, intermediary, somewhat enduring, emphatically Polish as well as Canadian identity can get underway and be worked out.

For those young persons who have maintained extensive ties to Polishness, there has frequently occurred a high degree of cognitive dissonance. On the one hand, they had mostly accepted the enculturation by their Polish parents, viewing Polishness as a very large element of their lives, yet at the same time, they had very great difficulties with ever finding a recognition of the importance of Polishness in the society at large. Thus, their inner map or picture or understanding of the world was set on a path of fundamental tension with the prevailing societal environment.

Those few young people who clung to extensive elements of Polishness were likely to have found the dissonance rather difficult to bear. And they had virtually no groups of peers within the Polish-Canadian community to interact with, or find a degree of comfort or reassurance with.

What seems to be the invariable destiny for virtually all persons of Polish descent in Canada, is to melt and meld into the rather bland category of the so-called mainstream. And it could be argued that the so-called mainstream is not a particularly exciting place to be today.

In Canada, unlike in the U.S., multiculturalism policies — especially in the 1970s — did give considerable attention to so-called "White ethnics." The increasing diversification of Canada has meant that Polish-Canadians are seen as less and less important. Most Polish-Canadians are astounded at the pace of the demographic transformation of Canada. They remember a time when they were considered as "too ethnic" — but now, they are seen as "not ethnic enough."

The prevalent, current-day mood of postmodernism and multiculturalism in Canada should in theory encourage the construction of various, strongly-felt intermediary identities — one among which could be the Polish-Canadian. However, this does not appear to be happening, as far as the creation of a more collectively-felt and lasting identity for those persons.

It would be in the interest of the Polish-Canadian community to see limits on current-day immigration — over 80 percent of which consists of "visible minorities" — since Polish-Canadians are becoming regarded as less and less important under the newer forms of multiculturalism. There is also the fact that the immigration numbers are now so huge, resulting in very rapid and massive demographic shifts. It would also be in their interest to cultivate a distinct Polish-Canadian identity, which would allow them to resist the various blandishments of the current-day North American pop-culture and consumer society.

It may be noted that in Poland today, there is a salutary resistance to alien immigration, and most of the country remains proudly patriotic. Canada and Poland could be seen as polar opposites within the broader Western world.

Atavisionary #fundie atavisionary.com

In one of many experiences I have had with this phenomenon, I was out with my friend and a group of people he knows including the heroine of this anecdote. The first point where I could see that this young scold was troublesome and prone to quarreling with her neighbors was when she brought up a contemporaneous debit card hacking thefts from Target and other stores in order to perform a vitriolic diatribe. Being keen to participate in the group discussion, I made the innocuous observation that while the hacker’s actions were wrong and deserving of punishment, the technical mastery he required to accomplish the crime was undoubtedly impressive. That a person engaged in criminal activity could demonstrate impressive skills was too much of an abstraction for her and thus provoked her to reveal her quarrelsome nature in the form of various insults towards me. Fortunately, another member of the group mollified her by explaining that a person may simultaneously have concepts with both positive and negative connotations associated with them without there being a contradiction. The emotional “reasoning” of many females seems to stumble when confronted with this fundamental, yet subtle, truth. However, though the third party adequately explained that being impressed by something doesn’t mean you condone the act, I am not convinced that it was anything more than a mere Pavlovian response to the attitude of multiple peers which doused her temper rather than a true comprehension of the nuance involved.

Later that same evening, we were all sitting around a table and out of blue our heroine pointedly asks me “What were the longest relationships you were in?” Seeing no immediate need for subtlety or outright dishonesty I responded frankly that “2 years was my longest relationship, but to be fair it wasn’t with an American woman.” Dear me, this was not a tactful thing to say to the common American scold as they will in their solipsism invariably interpret any comment or statement to be descriptive of their own person. Though there were signs she was getting ever so huffy, to my discredit I was hopelessly oblivious to the volcano preparing to erupt before me. Responding to her quite earnest desire for clarification, I elaborated on the fact that I find most American women difficult to get along with for anything longer than a fling given that so many are common scolds (though I did not use this terminology at the time). To this her barely contained rage erupted with a rabid desire for acrimonious verbal combat, yet her rage was too great to craft more than a small sum of suitable slurs and so she simply stomped off somewhere to succor her now sore psyche.

Of course this would not prove to be the end of this anecdote. Our resident white knight decides to step up to defend our heroine’s fragile ego since she found herself lacking the skill to patch this bit of cognitive dissonance. Sir lancelot starts by trying to lecture me about what kind of opinions I am allowed to have and what I am allowed to say. Not being a pussy and possessing an acute loathing of white knights, I was quick to assert that he had no authority to lecture me or to define the acceptable range of opinions I was allowed to possess. Our heroine’s knight in shining armor was so prepared to defend her “honor” that he had the audacity to threaten me physically if I couldn’t be otherwise cowed. Though, or perhaps because, I made it clear I was prepared to accept his challenge to fisticuffs, the tense moment eventually passed without coming to blows and the night continued without further incident. To escalate this absurdity to even greater heights, Sir Lancelot did all this despite his Guinevere being foreign born.

Probably all men, or at least all American men, have experienced this sort of situation as a result of the unruly and irrational emotions of the common American scold. The question is, when the institution of patriarchy is restored because of necessity, what can the new order do to reduce the number and severity of the disturbances to the public peace caused by such women and their valiant saviors? I think that English common law, as detailed in the introductory poem and links, sets a fine precedent of how such socially disruptive backbiters can be disabled. When a queen of histrionics and her knights of the unstable are identified, the punishment used to correct the bad behavior should be focused on public shaming and minor physical discomfort. Such chastisement is an appropriate response to the indignities caused by common scolds because the guilty would likely be easily reformed for the public good with only a few treatments. This is especially true of the most egregious version of the common scold currently in existence, which are of course the feminists who acrimoniously agitate for social norms that destabilize and eventually destroy civilisation. A few public dunks on a cucking stool for the most heinous of these harpies would humanely cure them of their hysteria and thoroughly deter any other would-be agitators.

TheVertex_ #sexist reddit.com

Normie women are typically progressive, feminist liberals. They have to deal with this extreme cognitive dissonance. It's incongruous with their progressive ideals to be effectively eugenicist in the dating scene. It's incongruous with their feminist ideals to be lambasting toxic masculinity in the university feminist club during the afternoon, and fucking a high-T, dark-triad Chad that same night. It's incongruous with their perception of themselves as being morally superior that the fact that they reject ugly men has anything to do with their looks, so they rationalize by claiming that the ugly man had a deficient personality in some way or another.

The blackpill, as you say, would utterly destroy their world view. Personality™ is the tool by which women rationalize their incel-hatred and preserve a semblance of psychological consonance vis-a-vis their dating preferences and their political views.

Normie men are typically cucks and closet incels. Of course, they can't swallow the blackpill because they're not much higher in the dominance hierarchy than incels are. Your typical beta-male cuck just gets occasional strawfish sex from his girlfriend. The idea that she doesn't desire him or that she would leave him for an alpha upsets the beta-male greatly. Rather than channelling his anger in something productive, he pretends to be a pseudo-alpha by shitting on incels online. "Look at me, I've had sex, you loser", ignorant to the reality that as he's wasting away on /r/IncelTears, his girlfriend is letting Chad use all three of her holes in a single night. For the cuck, incel hatred and rejection of the blackpill is effectively a defence mechanism motivated by fear.

Andy Schlafly, Ken DeMyer, Karajou, and others #fundie conservapedia.com

[From "Mystery: Why do non-conservatives exist?"]

Statistical Analysis

(Estimates)

-20%: did not hear about conservative principles until after they made up their mind and, perhaps due to pervasive societal bias, refuse to reconsider

-10%: genuinely lack of desire to find the truth, and instead desire attention, praise by liberal teachers, getting along by going along, and not standing up to liberal bullies

-10%: refuse to forgive themselves and let go of their past mistakes and image

-10%: believe myths created around government programs like the "New Deal" that liberal policies create jobs instead of destroying them and depriving people of liberty through government control.

-10%: fooled by the demonizing of conservatives and mistakenly feel that conservative benefits are available only to those who are from an intact family or privileged background

-10%: refuse to rise above their personal temptations, often self-destructive, and hate conservatives who criticize their self-indulgent behavior

-10%: feel that they deserve to make more money than they do, as in public school teachers and university professors, and refuse to rise above self-interest

-10%: harbor a grudge against a conservative, typically a parent but sometimes an ex-spouse, and refuse to forgive or rise above the animosity

-5%: like an anarchist, genuinely want to believe in and propagate destructive ideas

-5%: are susceptible to marketing and suggestion to an overlarge degree.

What Triggers Reconsideration of Liberal Beliefs?

What triggers reconsideration of liberal beliefs? Here are some estimates:

-25%: raising or teaching children, and realizing how destructive liberal values are to many of them

-15%: a religious conversion followed by taking the Bible to heart

-10%: a loss of a loved one that resulted from accepting or promoting liberal values, as in losing a loved one to crime caused by pornography, drug addiction, gambling, etc.

-10%: a new friendship with someone who is conservative, and realizing how much good flows from the conservative values[1]

-10%: simply by maturing and seeing liberalism's impact around them, and realizing what they were taught as youth was wrong

-5%: a desire to learn the truth, and a dislike for those who mislead

-5%: a genuine divine experience that can not be explained.

-5%: using conservative values to overcome an addiction, and then realizing the benefits of conservative values in many other ways

-5%: taking a truthful course in economics, or learning it in the workforce[2]

-10%: other.

Cultural indoctrination

Brainwashing and deceit:

-They pride themselves on doing well in school or reading the newspaper, can't accept that what they were taught was incorrect or biased.

-Dangerous professors who impose their opinions upon vulnerable youth.

-Television programs posing as comedies, such as South Park, Family Guy, and The Simpsons, which inject liberal beliefs and mock conservative values

-Exposed to incorrect liberal ideas throughout education. Standard American kindergartens up to the fourth grade. Wastes the potential of most children—does not expose them to foreign languages and other learning tasks their minds are obviously and mysteriously suited for. All helping to make them think they need liberal man-made structures that in fact limit their potential in a self-defeating sort of cycle.

-Indoctrination by liberal churches which have a disproportionate focus on biblical passages that appear to support liberal positions, eg. the adulteress story, the disciples holding everything in common, etc.

-A blind obsession to be famous, act and imitate the ways of their famous idols, to absorb their ideals as their own.

-Failure to realize that modern science and modern wealth are the result of historical processes set into motion by God-fearing Christian Conservatives like Blaise Pascal, Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton, and James Maxwell. (When the obvious importance of Christianity to these scientific figures' everyday lives comes up in an academic situation, dangerous professors—liberal historians and liberal scientists—have been known to label it as "some mental disorder".)

-Elementary through high school textbooks having appalling and reprehensible omissions on the basic facts of American life (religion, marriage, politics, and business)[3]

-For decades Universities have discriminated against hiring conservatives, especially social conservatives and religious believers.[4] This has resulted in most college graduates being exposed to liberals prejudiced against conservatives and conservative thought. These graduates become the teachers and other professionals who are unwitting soldiers in liberalism's battle against a Christian Reformed, Roman-Catholic/Anglican/Orthodox, obedient-to-God reality.

No exposure:

-Current fashions in American professional behavior make expressions of Christian faith awkward in the workaday world.

-Increasing zone of publicly funded anti-religious fanaticism (e.g., no school-sponsored prayer)

-Spectacle of entertainment industry (e.g., movies and T.V.) cuts into traditionally popular Christian church social activities

-Most universities and hospitals have forgotten or have been forced to deny (to get various grants and even retirement benefits for their professors) their religious roots. Catholic affiliated institutions remain one of the few exceptions (few or possibly no other body of Christians can make legitimate claims of offering modern Pastoral care as the Roman Catholic church)

Peer Pressure:

-They have liberal friends, and want their approval or acceptance.

-They live in a predominantly liberal state or community and fear rejection from said community.

Systemic bias:

-Some people are inherently irrational, and are thus driven to liberal ideology.

-Their job and salary, such as working for public schools, depends on keeping conservatives out of power.

-Media bias acts to caricature conservatism, making it seem unpalatable, conditioning people to reject its teachings.

-Schools reward politically correct, liberal answers on tests.

-Negative focusing by the media highlights personal flaws of conservatives, driving people to choose to identify with liberals rather than be categorized with those traits.

Liberal characteristics

Poor abstract thinking:

-They have trouble understanding some of the slightly abstract concepts in conservatism, such as "more guns, less crime," and "less taxes, more revenue."

-They are more comfortable discussing simple issues like race and poverty than complex issues like globalism.

-Intellectual myopia - failure to heed the long-term consequences of ideological positions that seem beneficial in the short term.

-Stereotyping: They knew a conservative whom they disliked for some reason, and tar all others with the same brush.

-Ignorance: politics isn't a priority for some people. Without any wish to learn to think for themselves, some liberals don't bother to think through what's right, and just go with what's "cool."

Closed-minded:

-They made up their mind before hearing conservative principles, and will not reconsider their views.

-They have something criticized by conservatives in their personal background, and feel compelled to defend it rather than let it go.

-Slavish adherence to the ideals of liberal parents

Naivety:

-Non-conservatives demonstrate just how prone mankind is to arrogance.

-An admiration for historical figures whom liberals claim were liberals.

-A desire for large government inculcated by personal weakness and reluctance to take personal responsibility.

-Impressionable individuals buying into Bush derangement syndrome, and reacting with emotion rather than reason.

-Reliance on charisma: Charismatic leaders trading on image, rather than experience, can dupe the unsuspecting.

Self-destructive or contrarian behavior:

-Some choose to do what is irrational.
-Use of mind-altering drugs, which encourages one to become a liberal to reconcile the cognitive dissonance, or dulls mental acuity resulting in mindless conformity.

-Sexual experimentation to make up for lack of self-esteem, often with multiple partners, with partners of the same gender, or in public places

-Unthinking rebellion against conservative parents.

-Determined to prove their "independence of mind" by denying authority

Anonymous Gossiper #conspiracy givemegossip.com

Reality is neither completely real nor completely fake. It is somewhere in between.

The only thing holding people back from knowing or witnessing this is their inability to understand that which is not presented based on their previously determined reality.

It takes time to understand because it's mostly "dimensional" stuff. You understand what you can bear witness to however most also believe in an omnipotent dimensional God. It creates a cognitive dissonance to try and understand it because to understand the 4th dimensional "God" (as depicted in the bible) (could be 3rd+ though) means to usurp God's authority.

Any "God" of the 4th dimensional including the space lizards who consider themselves Gods is no God at all. 5th or higher would be where such a character would come from. 5th is the architect level basically able to tinker with 4th dimensional attributes. 6th would be akin to a God that could be omnipotent as well as change things retroactively in the past. At least these are my understandings of the topic. If they take a physical form they are probably 5th dimensional characters; 6th and above wouldn't need it.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

For up to a month after being vaccinated for the measles the victim/patient sheds the virus.

In other words, it should be MANDATORY QUARANTINE for children who receive the measles vaccine since they are carriers and are shedding the virus and could infect someone who the vaccine either did not work for or who is too immune compromised to get the vaccine.

And while we're at it, how about mandatory quarantine's for people returning from ebola hot zones?

No to both of those? Then fuck off forcing a vaccine on me to keep me safe when it's clear that cognitive dissonance controls every decision making process of this insane nation of fools.

W. F. Price #fundie web.archive.org

Actually, Dragnet, I think white privilege is very real. I was the beneficiary of it while in China. White Mexicans do very well for themselves. A mediocre white female teacher in DC makes a whole hell of a lot more than most of her neighbors. When I was in Latvia I met some Americans who, although not privileged for their skin color, were definitely privileged by virtue of their nationality. There’s no way some of the mediocrities I met there could have had such high positions here. So perhaps “white” privilege is an inaccurate term, but elite privilege has always been a feature of civilization.

However, this privilege is conditional. And it’s predicated on a particular lifestyle and social system that is better suited to colonial Latin America than the dynamic democracy we have here. In some cases, privileged minorities can exist in a mutually beneficial relationship with their hosts, as in Sephardic Jews in early modern Holland, who invented modern finance with their Dutch colleagues and paved the way for the industrial revolution. However, what we have in the US is a privileged white minority that seeks first and foremost to be a parasite on other, non-privileged whites, and is trying (but failing) to do so through moral appeals.

Instead of trying to find a working solution, they are increasingly turning to divisive, confrontational politics, much as the white elite of the antebellum South forced the issue prior to the US Civil War. As much as it may cause cognitive dissonance to modern readers, I definitely see the white elite in this country as the modern incarnation of the Southern slaver culture. With a good grasp of history, it isn’t much of a stretch, but they’ve succeeded in casting themselves as champions of everyone but themselves even while they are perhaps the most tenacious parasites this nation has seen in ages.

Jonathan Gardner #fundie fwcon.wordpress.com

I have to wonder what is going on here. If homosexuality is perfectly normal, why would anyone be ashamed to be caught kissing another member of the same sex? Or do people who are homosexual not truly believe it is normal? When they try to convince us that it is normal, maybe they are simply trying to convince themselves.

Let me explain. I do things that are different from others. Some of them I am quite proud of, and even if I were the last man on earth doing it, I would continue doing it. If I were discovered, even if I tried to keep the act hidden, I would not be ashamed of doing it. If people ostracized or abused me or even threatened my life because of my behavior, I would feel a bit sad, but I wouldn’t stop doing the behavior, and I certainly wouldn’t commit suicide.

The reason why is because I believe the behavior is fundamentally right and good and honorable. My view doesn’t depend on what others think of me or my actions; I have made a conscious decision and that’s what I have decided is right.

I get the feeling that the suicide problem in the homosexual community is not because there are people who think it is odd or unnatural behavior, or even because some people think it is sinful behavior. Instead, I believe the reason why homosexuals tend to commit suicide when they are discovered or mocked is because they know the behavior is wrong, and have no self-control to correct their behavior to match what they believe to be right. In the end, when people point this out through ridicule, they are incapable of dealing with the cognitive dissonance and are lead to believe that only suicide can help them escape the anguish of that state of mind.

In other words, they aren’t committing suicide because of the actions of the people around them; they are committing suicide because of what they believe on the inside.

Michael Johns #conspiracy tremorx.com

First and foremost, the “Gypsy Curse,” as it is commonly referred to, should not be confused with the typical religious hex, especially in reference to Judeo-Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, Wicca, and Voodoo. A religious hexing, often called a ‘curse’ or ‘hex’, involves the binding of a damned spirit given free reign over one specific sphere of influence on a living host.

A Gypsy Curse differs significantly in that it does not involve spiritual encumbrance on the recipient. Rather, a gypsy curse (which, it is worth noting, is not limited only to “gypsies”) is a transference of negative psychokinetic energy from the caster. It is a common skill associated with anyone possessing paranormal psychic abilities, including telekinesis, psychometry, or telepathy.

Psychokinetic Transference is a method by which the psychically endowed can focus a pattern negative energy from their mind to that of a recipient. In many cases, it realigns the recipient’s thought and perception to filter any thoughts that contradict the transmitted pattern. A key example is the recorded 1823 curse of one Cpl. Owen P. Samuels, wherein he refused to give water to a thirsting Romani. He was then ‘cursed’ to remain in thirst forever. Samuels eventually died of dehydration. Interviews with his peers indicated that, in his final weeks, Samuels would refuse any drink with meals, and would become agitated if served any sort of beverage. The gypsy curse forced him to reject a basic biological need for water, resulting in death.

Relation to Gypsies

Because these abilities are bound to specific genetic markers, they may follow a certain lineage. Because the early Romani tribes were frequently isolated from other ethnic groups, a certain amount of inbreeding served to amplify and replicate their psychic genetics, and the skill of psychokinetic transference was passed from generation to generation. While they possess other abilities, the sad reality is that most Romani gypsies have not learned to harness any of them due to a lack of awareness. The use of a gypsy curse to ‘reverse’ a person’s fortune is an entirely cultural construct, as psychokinetic transferences can realign a recipient to any sort of suggestion.

Spiritual Effects

The gypsy curse is, in and of itself, not responsible for any direct contact with the spirit world. However, because it requires a significant amount of paranormal psychokinetic energy to cast, it will attract the attention of any spirits with an affiliation with the recipient. This may manifest as something as benign as ‘dreams’ from past loved ones, or may invite the attentions of malicious poltergeists who merely happened to be in the vicinity. As a result, many gypsy curses will appear to be accompanied by paranormal phenomenon. It is important to note this this is incidental and not a direct symptom of psychokinetic transference.

Reversal

Psychokinetic realignments are challenging to reverse. They can not be reversed by the recipient, as their own mind will prevent them from thinking or behaving in any way that counteracts the “curse.” The easiest way to reverse the effects is to reconcile with the person responsible for casting it, though this is extremely rare. The Romani culture does not pass instruction on removing a curse, so it is unlikely the transmitting party will even know that the curse can be reversed, let alone how to go about it. Many psychics will be able to remove the curse, provided they know the specific pattern that was imprinted in the recipient’s mind. As a result, only parts of a curse can be reversed while some portions will linger indefinitely. In some cases, a trained psychic has been able to create a pattern that can either circumvent or contradict a ‘curse’ well enough to make the victim either comfortable with their situation, or simply unaware of it. However, many who have been treated in this manner have eventually succumbed to madness, likely induced from involuntary cognitive dissonance regarding basic biological functions. In some rare cases, victims who have suffered from severe head trauma, stroke, and aneurysm have exhibited reduced or altogether elimination of the effects of their “curse.” However, these incidents may themselves be the end result of said curse – unfortunately the subjects had no recollection of what their curse was.

Samuel James #fundie patheos.com

Dreher is saying that once you define what it means to be a human person in terms of the autonomous will, then the human body becomes an ancillary piece of existence which can and should be changed, forced upon or even mutilated so that it lines up with the inner self. The body becomes either a sacrosanct extension of personal identity or an errant clump of matter that distracts from your true self. What really matters is the personal will, the inner self-expression of identity; the body simply has to follow suit or get out of the way.

This lesson in metaphysics is helpful in understanding why many people who seemingly celebrate the apparent happiness and flourishing of life at any expense to moral norms also see no problem with the termination of unborn life when it is “inconvenient.” If the essence of humanness is what I feel, then it makes perfect sense for Caitlyn Jenner to say “This is who I really am” with no regard to biological reality. But then, if that is so, it also makes perfect sense to reason that an unborn fetus, which has no expressible inner will, but which does have a well-formed and beautiful body, should not be allowed to veto the self-determining will of anyone, much less the individual who would be “forced” to carry it to term.

Do you see what has happened here? The religion of personal autonomy has not just altered our morals or our social norms; it has radicalized our understanding of ourselves. Instead of being souls under the tender sovereignty of a Creator, with a body of His making, we now see ourselves as our own creation. How can that be, when we obviously don’t create ourselves? Well, we don’t create ourselves physically, but we do “create” ourselves in other ways, and if the physical body is not part of our true self–indeed, if it can actually be the opposite of our true self–then it doesn’t really count, and we really are self-created things.

Recently I was perusing the Twitter page of a progressive writer who identifies as bisexual and pro-choice. She wrote effusively in critique of a conservative evangelical blogger who had criticized her sexual ethics. Her main point was that her sexuality, her sexual identity, was not a debatable moral position. “My existence,” she wrote, “is not a moral argument.” In other words, this writer’s bisexuality wasn’t just self-evidently moral, it was actually beyond the purview of morals altogether; her sexual identity was her personhood, and her personhood did not require some sort of ethical justification.

What jarred me was that she then pivoted from this argument into a defense of Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry. She passionately argued that abortion on demand was morally fine and that any other reality was a viable threat on women’s health and freedom. It was one of the most astonishing feats of logical gymnastics I’d ever seen. Just moments after pleading that her personhood, expressed in her sexuality, was an objective fact and not subject to a philosophical examination, she openly denigrated the value of unborn life and subjugated its personhood to the self-determining will of adults.

This kind of radical cognitive dissonance can only survive on a steady diet of misnomers. Call it “transgenderism,” “genderfluid” or “becoming who I really am.” Call it “tissue,” “a clump of cells,” or “reproductive health.” Call it anything other than what is. A generation that is authentically seeking after truth does not have at arm’s reach a platoon of highly contemporary socio-psychological vocabulary. The sheer amount of effort that many put into obscuring reality suggests that we are running from our own conscience. We are not confident. We have to avoid the traps of honest language continually.

I’m reminded of what the demon Screwtape told his underling about temptation and language:

Your man has been accustomed, ever since he was a boy, to have a dozen incompatible philosophies dancing about together inside his head. He doesn’t think of doctrines as primarily “true” or “false,” but as “academic” or “practical,” “outworn” or “contemporary,” “conventional” or “ruthless.” Jargon, not argument, is your best ally in keeping him away from the Church. Don’t waste time trying to make him think materialism is true! Make him think it is strong, or stark, or courageous–that it is the philosophy of the future. That’s the sort of thing he cares about.

The illusion cannot last forever. Deborah Nucatola was giving us a wake up call. The arc of secularism is long but it bends toward profit, violence, and oppression.

Liptusg #sexist reddit.com

"We have nothing against virgins. Also, only a terrible person could end up a virgin."

"We don't hate virgins, some of my best beta orbiters friends are virgins! We just hate those pathetic misogynistic incels who are entitled and blame their problems on whamenz! Work on ur shitty personality"

"The reason I can get face-fucked by 10 Chads on Tinder in a rape-play session is due to my impeccable 'social skills', my vagina's functionality as a moral compass, and the fact that all it takes to get a partner is some basic human decency and hygiene! If you're unable to get a partner, that's because you are fundamentally inferior to me both psychologically and morally in every way possible, otherwise you'd have no problem finding someone"

Normie logic. At every opportunity, they claim to have nothing against the 'normal', PC, left-wing yet non-volcel virgins who do not identify as incels, how much more admirable they are than incels, and so forth, positing that incels are uniquely depraved for the crime of standing up to gynocentric gaslighting. As soon as they are confronted with the fact they are committing a chronological fallacy ( You can't develop "sour grapes" attitudes without experiencing shunning, ostracism and discrimination in the first place ), or whenever circle-jerking themselves about how laughable and absurd the situation of sexually excluded men is, they always inform you that even if you do not HATE WHAMENZ or participate in wrongthinking, and yet still fail to garner even the tiniest shred of sexual attention from women, then clearly the only possible factor you should be considering is that you are an unimpressive, unaccomplished, worthless shitty person who should assign all blame to his own undefined failings ( Women's attraction being the chief authority on these matters ) or else risk the wrath of the matriarchy for even daring to entertain notions like evolutionary biology, hypergamy, macro socioeconomics of sexuality, Sexual selection, published psychological research, and other problematic ideas.

Now, putting the mountain of braindead NPC bullshit and endless documentation ( Including according to women's description of their ex-sexual partners and rants on social media ) about women's incredibly machiavellian and perverse mating criteria which we all know and love, the Mean Girls and their male enablers have clearly backed themselves into the corner of shameful cognitive dissonance with their mindless antiques, given that their mindset extends to all of the supposed token, submissive virgins they profess to have nothing against.

If all you need to get laid or have a girlfriend is some of that muh basic human decency, social etiquette, showers and 'not whining', then what those women and men are saying is that every single male virgin they know of in their life who does want sexual or romantic intimacy must be an indecent, socially retarded, filthy, pathetic, value-less whiny piece of trash. What other reason could there be for them to get rejected for so long? Truly, any 'non-incel' virgin would be lucky to have such fine folk as his friends and family.

But hey, it's cool! Just because I think that the virgins I fraternize with are the scum of the earth and pitiful losers who are worse human beings than any man who's ever stuck his dick in a girl's hole doesn't mean I'm hateful or prejudiced against them! It's uhhh, not the same, you understand. To their credit though, it must be said that some of those 'ex-permavirgin' preacher types do follow up on their own premise - by attributing their past virginity to their own worthlessness and deficiencies as woman-approved humans, which may indeed be a valid observation in their case given how philosophically stunted they are, yet one which unfortunately they project on everyone else and insist on blind adherence to - you're either a self-flagellating virgin, or a world-blaming loser.

For this reason, you find women and normies stammering all over themselves in various subreddits during times of social expediency ( Most of the time though in AskWomen and the like, they'll just launch into a full tirade about how inferior and defective the poster must be, and how good it will be for him to accept that ) to mask the logical extension of their mindsets whenever some virgin man comes prostrating himself before them, prefacing his thread with countless apologies, before expressing his sorrow over not achieving their sexual transcendence. At which point, several damage control first responders might awkwardly come out with the following:

"Teehee, I'm sure there's a right person somewhere, it took me 10 years of College sex partying before I finally met the husband of my dreams! We are alike!"

"Uhhh, errr, durr, emm, w-w-what do you even need to think about sex and relationships for? Just focus on uh.. other things and just..wait...nervous glances

Poster: But I want to know exactly why is that -

"Shut up you piece of shit! You don't want to sound like an entitled whiny incel, do you? Just go participate in more hobby groups and patiently keep your head down until you're magically in a relationship. And don't ever ask any questions about women's decisions ever again."

Of course, none of the answers that any virgin will be getting are going to rationally explain why is it that for the majority of someone's life, no woman ever finds him to be 'her type', nor eager and welcoming to his advances as much as she will be to any crass 'creepy PM' from a Chad on Tinder, for as long as women and normies refuse to recognize the Halo Effect, Gender Dimorphic sexual selection, Dark Triad psychology and overall, the indisputable historical and scientific truth that the correlation between being a Just person, wisdom, and other profound concepts to sex appeal is completely null, and that only a weak correlation exists even for being an interesting conversationlist or 'muh confidence' in comparison to appearance, dominance and power.

And so their only choice is either deflect, deflect, deflect, or own up to the fact that they hold each and every single involuntary virgin they ever met in their life in contempt, as an inferior person and non-decent human being who must be patronized about their flawed and despicable existence as the reason of failing to gain traction with women's base instincts. ( But remember, they love diversity and hate othering of deviant and non-binary social groups ).

You can't have it both ways, friend-o's. You either accept the facts of sexual dynamics throughout human evolution and their amoral, reactionary nature, or you admit just how much toxicity, smug self-superiority and disdain you harbor toward every single virgin on the planet who is not abstinent by choice. Feel free to PM me with justifications too if you want, would love to hear it.

some MRAs #sexist reddit.com

Re: I love it when Tumblr Feminists and the usual suspects say men won't help themselves. These young guys from #MENchester raise money for Male DV Victims, and their children.

(BlueOrange22)
Anti-MRA employs classic manipulative tactics- first they say the MRM isn't necessary because feminism "helps men to." But then, when you point out the things feminists do that hurt men (gendered DV laws, etc) or the issues they ignore (conscription), they say "oh, well feminism isn't about men."

(fyrie)
Feminists falsely claim feminism is also about men

When men need help feminism ignores the issue

When men help themselves feminism purposefully try and negate the effort

(armaadi)
Then they say, "if you care so much about men, do something about it". Then they get ticked off at MRAs for doing something about it..

(89peters)
Australia hosted the first ever large MRA rally a few days ago. Hundreds of men and women attended. Subjects discussed included the demonization of men, discrimination against boys in school, discrimination against male victims of domestic violence, and the importance of recognizing that males and females should not be at war with each other; nature designed us to be symbiotic. If you harm men you harm women, and if you harm women you harm men. That was the message.

How did feminists respond?

They organized a "counter-march" and tried to drown out the speakers using megaphones and inane chants. One of the chants was "Racist sexist anti-queer, MRA's not welcome here!" This suggests that they haven't even bothered to study the men's rights movement. Anti-gay and racist sentiment are vanishingly rare in the MRM. Ditto misogyny. Many MRAs, including myself, used to consider themselves feminists until they looked at the hard data. I oppose feminism precisely because I support gender equality.

The woman who organized the men's march down under is indeed right wing. She's a Trump supporter. I'm more of a "radical leftist" type, the kind of person Jordan Peterson warns you about. But you know what? I don't fucking care if she is right wing. The rally was non-partisan, and the speakers discussed important issues that most leftists are currently ignoring or attempting to justify.

We cannot continue to pretend as though feminism is a movement for gender equality. It more closely resembles a hate movement. I would not be surprised at all if, within 20 years or so, feminists are regarded in the same way we now regard the Ku Klux Klan.

(Fortnite_FaceBlaster)
Yea, people call me an "MRA" in a negative fashion, as if that's supposed to dismiss anything I have to say.

(armaadi)
They think if they dismiss you as a person they dont have to defend their arguments.

(LEGALinSCCCA)
This is how one "always wins". It's basically the terroristic way of dealing with life. And it causes cognitive dissonance to an extreme. Because they know they're wrong. But refuse to accept it. Which makes them dig in.

(PeonSupreme)
Feminists disrupt, impede and interfere with men’s efforts to form communities amongst themselves, separate and apart from women. They mistakenly believe a weak man poses less of a threat than a strong one.

Anders #fundie new.euro-med.dk

Illuminati/Masonic Dehumanisation of the Masses

[...]

In a world of ignorance, apathy, gross contradiction, cognitive dissonance and denial … what will it take for the masses to wake up? Granted, they have been deceived, but living in zombie-like trances they lack responsibility towards themselves and their fellow humans: It’s therefore no surprise to see them buy into the effronteries and blindly give their consent to the ruling elite’s agendas, not knowing about the underlying hidden, dark and destructive ulterior motives.

A major effect of these agendas is that they are dehumanizing. In light of this, here are 5 indicators to show how the ruling elite’s agendas are covertly dehumanizing the masses on many levels for manipulation, and what needs to be done to prevent the disastrous consequences.

For instance, in a recent article, Google engineering director Ray Kurzweil and here in so many words, claims that a stronger, brighter and sexier human race will emerge before 2045. Enhanced Homo sapiens Mk-2 will have had their brains fused with technology, belong in a technological cybernetic society to become a singularity… -Some of us can’t help thinking that this is something to greatly mistrust.

See Project Moscow 2045 – started by media mogul Itskov: The Devil speaks and rejoices.
Ray Kurzweil is Jewish – and Dmitry Itskov, the author of “Moscow 2045” has a Jewish surname from the Minsk region

Here follow 5 characteristics of the NWO dehumanisation/Making of Zombies.

I: The transhumanism agenda is a deception. Retrospectively, just about everything the ruling elite do only benefits a relative small handful of individuals and transhumanism will be no exception. Through the technology, the rest of the populace will be enslaved in a technological mind control prison…

The more humans who incorporate themselves with cybernetics or anything else making up transhumanism, the more they will lose their powerful connection to spirituality and all those qualities related to unconditional love; kindness, empathy, generosity, big-heartedness, concern… Thus, humans will lose their true power to stop the new world order and may even become extinct.
Transhumanism is greatly flawed. Major tenets of transhumanism are based on false pretexts. For example, it assumes that consciousness is only activity in our brains in its attempt to preserve the brain and achieve immortality…

II: The artificial intelligence (AI) flaw
Following on, while it has made great science fiction, the idea of robots or computers becoming intelligent sentient beings, having the ability to be emotional and creative will never happen in the real world.

The Express 23 June 2016: BRUSSELS bureaucrats are considering transferring human rights to robots if artificial intelligence (AI) becomes so powerful that droids end up thinking for themselves.
the European Parliament to the EU Commission has suggested in the future sentient AI robots could need their own rights and responsibilities, and strict laws banning them from taking over too many jobs across the Continent may become necessary. In the 1950s Asimov predicted robots would eventually have to adhere to laws

*******************************************************************************

Everything a robot or computer does (or ever will) is only through a series of pre-programmed responses in conjunction with its database, having no free will choice.

And that’s it.

3. The hive mind
Transhumanism and AI threaten to dehumanize us in the respects that it will take away our individuality. Instead of being free to express our natural unique creative and playful individuality, we will be forced to become ‘empty shells,’ as one with the hive mind. When the control-obsessed technocrats try to force their depersonalizing hive mind ideology it will cause many problems and humans are sure to revolt(???).

Just one of many flaws in the technocracy agenda.

5. T.H.E.Y want you to be like them
T.H.E.Y (The Hierarchy Enslaving You) want you to be heartless empty shell psychopaths, driven by self-interests and gratification in their hierarchical controlling pyramidal power structures…

T.H.E.Y want you to be the effect of their owned and controlled mainstream media, as, for instance, through the soul-jarring music blasting out and TV or movies where people are so horrible to each other…

Fake mainstream media news, fake money, fake medicine, fake political democracies, fake wars, etc. – as if that wasn’t enough, T.H.E.Y want you to willingly fit into their archontic fake existence through transhumanism … ultimately leading to your destruction, as secretly planned…

That concludes just 5 of the many indicators showing how the ruling elite’s agendas are dehumanizing the masses.

Natural Family Planning #fundie nfpworks.wordpress.com

Have you heard of the “Childfree” movement?

That’s right. The cultural fallacy that children are burdens, animals are environmentally friendly ”kids” and no parenting is better than bad parenting has an official meeting place. Quite literally, their whole mission is to throw (jettison is probably a better word) the baby out with the bathwater!

Summary: the Childfree movement is made up of people who can’t have kids or don’t want kids (for various reasons), and are tired of a cultural stigma for being sterile and/ or childless. Hence, they’re not child-less–they’re childfree! Weeee!!! Now doesn’t a sterilized population sound fun?

Actually, no. This hurts my heart, soul, mind and body more than I can really say. It’s evil organized and incarnate at worst, and cognitive dissonance at best. I mean really, do these people hate themselves, because it seems to me that unless they were dropped from another planet, they themselves were children once, and oops–thank you to the “ferility idolizers” that were their parents!

The society members site various and sundry, but radically fatuous, reasons for their choice to embrace sterility: bad parenting, overpopulation, environmental and economic concerns related to the formers, but the most honest reason is plain old devoted narcissim.

I cannot possibly address this narcisistic fundamentalism in one post, but let me start with one thing: overpopulation. Overpopulation is so passé. De-population is the new overpopulation. It’s the new crisis. And hello! It’s not all that new. Just because Oprah hasn’t done a show on it, Sheryl Crow hasn’t sung about it, and the Economist only just got it in the news doesn’t mean it’s a passing worry. Depopulation is at crisis levels in Western Europe and even China-the-vast is foreseeing the cripling wound of sterility that will effect their economy dissasterously.

This isn’t just the rally cry of fertility fanatics, either, but now is the intellectual clarion cry of the demographer, the doomsday prophecy of the secular uber-intellectual. Take, for example, Andrew Pollard. He’s the director of EMP Intelligence Service, a UK based Competitive Intelligence consultancy which focuses on, among other things, population trends. He gave a talk at the Pro Life Action League’s 2006 Conference, “Contraception is Not the Answer.” Let me tell you, I was sure the overpopulation myth had run it’s course, but listening to his talk compelled me that not only is overpopulation a fallacy, but depopulation is a crisis of epic proportions, the likes of which we have never seen.

Elizabeth Levesque #fundie blogs.telegraph.co.uk

You are the one lost with no connection to reality sorien. Cognitive dissonance? That would be you and your ilk throughout history. Try recent history. Deaths in the millions due to atheism. No accountability. Just murder. Take margaret sanger. Ex catholic. Disciple of hitler and joseph mengela. Eugenics. Euthanasia. 50 million babies murdered in usa. 17 million of them minority babies. No problem right? "We don't want too many of those people" she said. Drain on society? Poor? Minorities? Make sure they don't breed. Old people? Drain on society. They lived long enough. Let them die. Spend money on young people. Let the sick old rich farts die. Let the sick old poor farts die. They have lived long enough right? And what about babies in the womb? Just tissue. Rip it out. They would probably have a crappy life with that uneducated and poor and crappy single mother. Not worth it. Rip that tissue out. No problem. Life is worthless. We are in power. We dictate what human life is worth. You get to live. You over there get to die. Atheism thinks this murderous way.

Some incels #sexist #fundie reddit.com

Re: just call a suicide hotline bro. they’ll help you! []

image

(WailingWhalesInWales)

These seem like well-adjusted people.

Here's a copy paste edit of a comment I recently made:

I honestly believe that ITcels are lower intelligence than average though. Their complete lack of ability to form arguments and use logic is actually outstanding. Whenever you engage with an ITcel, it's like fighting a wild animal. They just foam at the mouth and shit everywhere. Even within their own community they will upvote comments that are blatantly irrational or paradoxical.

When you consider that the majority of ITcels are suffering from mental disorders such as bipolar, schizophrenia, and transgenderism, it makes sense. If you don't believe me, you can see this for yourself by briefly clicking through random users in any IT thread and check out their active communities/brief post history. The most hilarious (and highly prevalent) archetype among them is the soycucks who have outright misogynistic or alt right coping (such as the_donald--a subreddit that blackedsigma has in his active community list) post histories. You can literally see their internal mental battle between hating women and being a whiteknight cuck. These people are not in a stable mindset.

(Anormalregularperson)

They want to live up to their culture’s idealization of the word “good” more than they are able to be curious about what is real. They are more attached to the idea of “good guys” and “bad guys” than they are attached to the desire to know what is true.

That’s why their capacity for logic and reason is very poor, while their will to make fun and shame is very advanced. Lots of them are literally living the truths and realities that are presented here, but because these facts make them uncomfortable or stimulate intense cognitive dissonance within them they just deny it out of pure emotion, cherry picking the most ignorant comments and retreating into the self righteous comfort of feeling morally superior to others.

So many men today are literally involuntary celibate, or are very close to being incel that it is ridiculous....and it’s actually getting worse. The implications of this reality are unacceptable for the gynocentric, women are wonderful status quo. Rather than confront this in a rational way, many men would rather posture to show that they are attractive in some way (think of how common it is for men to fraud or exaggerate, especially online, their moral fashionableness, their height, their partner count, their penis size, how much money they make, ect) to feel good about themselves and like a “good”/“real” man to complete anonymous strangers on the internet.

As long as it makes them feel superior to shame anti-gynocentric thought, that’s exactly what they are going to do. They don’t care at all about what is logical or what is true, they only really care for their own image....the epitome of a feminized mindset and culture.

(doomercel)

IT soyboys are garbage who think they know it all throwing their bluepills out, but tbh, the roasties on IT are some of the most cruellest cunts in existence that definitely do get off on suicide and making men miserable. that's why IT foids come here and mock us.

(FAloner)

They are worse than us. Almost everyone of us wouldn't even harm a fly, meanwhile they talk people into suicide.

And no, inceltears, we're not encouraging suicide amongst ourselves, the rope meme is an expression of despair, helplessness, and understanding.

(TimeToMurder)

good thing I already 100% disregard normy society in every way and if I ever have problems I either deal with it myself or vent to obscure, hated internet subcultures. Would never call some faggot normie on a suicide hotline. Why? Probably just a low IQ douche obsessed with being perceived in a good light and has no real convictions.

(31cabbage)

Please remember, suicide hotlines are made for "lonely" mothers, frustrated family men, attractive teenagers who broke up with their 5th boyfriend etc etc.

They are not made for childless low value unattractive males. There is no guarantee of anonymity, don't make your life worse. Don't let them stamp you with a loony tag and use it against you later on.

(LyricThrowAgay)

See, there's really no reason why incels and their rhetoric should bother them. Accept, they're basically the lowest of the low themselves. So they need to hate you guys to make it through the day.

No different than coping racist in my opinion. Might as well find a way to profit of them.

(interruptor-)

They’d put us in concentration camps if they had a chance. Fuck law fuck morality we only want to kill ugly people who are bitter and got buttfucked by life.

Unironically diabolic people. I would never wish such things (perhaps to some serial killers, but this is not the case).

(redlionred)

hate those weaker than you. be a heartless savage but twist it to make it seem the weak deserve it. same logic is used by western white nations to attack and destroy weaker "so called uncivilized" non-white nations.

(youjustabattlerapper)

The only thing that can generate this type of hate is self loathing

They know they are incel and only by hating incels as viciously as possible can they "maintain" the lie that they are not one

Just smdh

(Carkudo)

That is pretty horrible, but it's a bit more understandable when you see what they're replying to:

https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/ao3lrz/if_she_says_no_scald_her/efypbso/?context=8&depth=9

Yeah dude, if abusing the already flawed mental health system to goad people you don't like into suicide can be "understandable" to you, you're a piece of shit and need to be isolated. You're disgusting.

How the hell do you privileged fucks even grow to be this evil? You get showered with love all your life and yet come out uglier than some criminals.

mangosplumsgrapes #sexist reddit.com

Damn, I realize that this is so much longer than I intended it to be. Sorry! So I used to be someone in support of trans people, I actually found it inspiring that trans people were willing to flout convention and be whoever they wanted to be despite what society says they should be. To me it represented the dawn of a future of acceptance and freedom. I fully bought into the idea that they are trapped in the wrong body and that they are the gender that they believe they are. The very first thing that popped that naive bubble was when I realized that the only trans people that you see in the media, the only ones who are getting support and respect, are trans women.

I thought to myself, why, since men are the ones with power in society, is it not trans men who are visible, leading the movement? I asked this question on another internet forum, and someone answered simply, the reason trans women are getting respect is because they are actually men, and the reason trans men are virtually invisible is because they are actually women. At that moment I had the uncomfortable realization that despite having transitioned, trans people are still afforded the amount of privilege and respect, or lack thereof, that the sex they were born with accrues. That was the first small puncturing of the rosy bubble.

Then I became friends with a guy who had previously identified as trans. He was no longer trans when I met him, but there was still so much cognitive dissonance going on. The following is going to be a rant about him that I need to get off my chest. He told me when we met that he was in depression in his teens and 20s because he wanted to be a girl and that he almost transitioned in his mid 20s, but didn’t go through with it because he realized that he wouldn’t pass as female transitioning this late in life. At first, I found the story interesting and felt bad that he had felt trapped in the wrong body for so long and had hated himself.

But… then I realized that a lot of things didn’t add up. I had always thought that most TIM are trans because they have typically feminine interests, feminine mannerisms, are often gay etc…. but he had none of this whatsoever. He is masculine, there is NOTHING feminine about him. Had he actually transitioned he would have been the butchest woman alive. I asked him about this and he said, “well, I thought I’d just be a tomboy girl.” His interests, way of moving and speaking, way of communicating and relating to the world, to women, EVERYTHING about him was stereotypically nerdy heterosexual male. He told me that he didn’t start to desire to be a girl till he was 11 or 12.

I also found it odd that he watches almost exclusively typical straight male sci-fi and superhero movies. For example he loved the creepy male fantasy film Passengers. If he actually feels like a woman, shouldn’t he be identifying with the female characters in movies, not the male characters? If so, why does he only watch movies that are from male perspectives, where the women aren’t fully fleshed out and are viewed as romantic/sex objects? Despite being a typical guy, he viewed himself as feminine. He would ask me, am I feminine, is my face feminine? When I would tell him, no, there’s nothing feminine about you, you are masculine. No, you’re face isn’t feminine, he’d become offended.

I went to a ladies night at a club with him, and I realized that it was inappropriate for him to be there and I told him this. His response was, “you don’t get it, I don’t feel like a man, and maybe there are some bisexual women at the club” I said very firmly to him, that it doesn’t matter how HE feels, he IS a man, and therefore it’s not appropriate for him to be there and even if there are bisexual women there, they didn’t go to a ladies night to meet men. I tried to explain to him that sometimes women just want to be with other women and away from men. He protested that it was unfair to exclude him and that he didn’t believe in gender anyway. Then the whole controversy over the female-only screenings of Wonder Woman came up. I chatted with him about it and he said, “when you’re othered by a group, you suddenly feel very disconnected and isolated from them.” This just astounded me that he is protesting about being othered by a group that he IS other to! You’re not a woman!

When I met him, I thought that the fact that he had considered himself a woman for so long would make him more sensitive and understanding of women, I was wrong. His so-called feeling like he’s a woman had NOTHING to do with identifying with actual women. If it did, he would watch movies with female protagonists, he’d have female friends etc. He would have felt himself a girl pre-puberty. Instead his desire to be a woman came from sexual fantasies, he told me how he would watch porn and imagine himself as the woman.

His insistence that female-only places are discriminatory comes from a complete lack of understanding of what it’s like to be a woman in the world. It is not discriminatory for women to want spaces where we can actually feel free, because like it or not, we are always restricted when around men because they are stronger and more aggressive than women, and are often looking for sex from women. Even a town with only females, or a business that hired only women, would not be discriminatory, because women are placed at that much of a disadvantage to men, just because of our biology. He didn’t understand any of this.

His insistence to be included in something he doesn’t belong in shows a lack of respect for women and our experiences. His belief that he’s feminine comes from a denial of actual women, who are the ones who are actually feminine. There are some men who are feminine, but he was not one of them. If he had knowledge of the way women relate to others, move around the world, engage in conversation, he would realize he isn’t feminine, but I guess he had never observed women closely enough to realize he isn’t like the majority of them. His trans-ness didn’t come from feeling like a woman in any way. That was all bullshit. It came from his own narcissistic desire, with a total lack of acknowledgement of actual women and that we are in fact different from him.

This made me realize how dangerous denying gender/sex is. Gender/sex affects all of us. With small exceptions, there are two kinds of humans, and the experience of being the two kinds are very different. His denial of this is childish and self-serving. He was a pretty cool guy in many ways, but this was a wedge that couldn’t be surmounted. This friendship made me realize that a denial of gender also means a denial of feminist issues. At the women’s march, there was a group of girls holding up a sign saying, “men are afraid that women will laugh at them, women are afraid that men will kill them”. I pointed to the sign and said it was true. He became offended. I told him I wasn’t talking about him at all, but that it IS a reality of being a woman. He just wouldn’t have it, he thought I was trying to make him feel bad about being male by pointing out that sign. I wasn’t trying to make him feel bad, I was just pointing out a sign that was true, should I have held back because he’s a guy and his feelings might get hurt? How are we supposed to have a conversation as a society about rape, sexual harassment, and violence, when men whine that their feelings are hurt when you point out that men do the majority of these things?

Since then I have also come to realize that a lot of people who transition do so because they don’t feel accepted as a gay person. For example, the singer Charice who has transitioned to being a man. When she first transitioned, I felt happy for her, because I thought she was finally getting to be her true self. Then someone pointed out the amount of abuse she got when she came out as a butch lesbian, and that transitioning to male was probably her attempt to escape that abuse. I am not inside Charice’s head, so I can’t say with certainty what is motivating her, but I think that person was probably right and that makes me very sad. So all of this combined with recent attempts to erase the word woman to say “person’s with uteruses” and the push to get anyone who identifies as trans on female sports teams etc etc, has made me realize this trans/ a-gender movement is erasing women, erasing us a category, erasing the protections we have, erasing gay people. I have realized that it is not a progressive movement at all, but another form of males getting to do whatever the hell they want at the expense of women.

send_nasty_stuff #conspiracy archive.is

The holocaust is a normie foundation myth that could almost be classified as a religious belief at this point. It's a priori and can not be questioned. So you really don't want to drop it on them as your first pill. I agree that it will cause too much cognitive dissonance in the average NPC and they will vomit up the pill and lash out.

That being said I'm in that camp that believes we will never be able to buck the pervasive jewish control of media and banking without a mass awakening to the holohoax. Without breaking people out of that conditioning you can't really get them to understand the gravity of the situation we are in. Jewish mind controllers crown jewel weapon is white guilt and the holocaust is the ultimate white guilt. Break that and we win. Smash the jews best weapon and we secure a future for our people.

Some TERFs #sexist reddit.com

Re: How to Eat Out a Non-Op Trans Woman

(imscrewed2222)
they get off on the cognitive dissonance they force upon people and themselves, the illusion of "being in control" of how others view basic reality, and the narcissistic reassurance that they are special and different - they don't "just" have "dicks", they have "girl dicks". if you go along with any of these lies, and give in to their terminology, they only get reinforcement and you're the enabler. the whole trans thing is a form of disassociation, its an escape from manhood into a fictional feminine "womb" fantasy world of comfort and cummies. cleverly coercing people to use these contradictory words like "girl dick", calling their dick a clit and other doublespeak further distorts reality, and pushes them further into fantasy land. is one of the main motivating factors the desire to restructure reality because they live in a daydream, a reverie, and so the more they're enabled, the more it appears to be real and fuels their escape? they're lying to themselves and want everyone else to as well. the woke enablers/munchausen types are just as bad, perhaps actually more dangerous in their naivety and "compassion".

(FlatCommunication5)
tbqh these men aren't any more childish or selfish than the average patriarchal guy. They think women were put on Earth to help them bring their (dyonisian, in this case) aspirations to fruition the point of complete self-effacement (up and including unwanted sex), and of course, how dare we question their god-given right to orgasm the exact way they want to. male-on-female violence and coercion is rampant in the queer community.

Plus the autogynephile activist's projections (I'm a woman because all women are narcissistic wh*res deep down) ring familiar as well.

one could argue trans activism reproduces and illustrates the pitfalls of patriarchy - Women could support men's dreams to their detriment but what if these men don't have a clue what they're doing?

(griffxx)
This isn't about Men. This has everything to do with with Lesbians. Welcome to OUR world. These are specifically instructions for women. The instructions would be much different for men.

These are particular instructions for women. That whole explaining of how the structural development of a clitoris and a penis have a "shared history" in embryotic the stage. It's "just" that the YSR kicked. But just the same.

What kind of delusional and gaslighting campaign, has to be conducted, in order to for Trans women to internalized this biologically incoherence; so they can spread this message as Gospel.

(oneshadeofgreen)
"It’s rare for a public conversation about what trans women do in bed to have a vocabulary and grammar that we decide upon.”

Hahaha are you kidding me? Rare? This entire conversation and the language, both public and private, is dominated by TIMs. What I’ve seen on various social media is TIMs manipulating their sexual partners to do everything and anything they want, stealing our language about our own bodies and claiming it as their own or else telling women who disagree with them to “suck their ladydick”.

It’s so clear that they are aiming this at women too. It’s another version of ‘how to gaslight and manipulate lesbians into having sex with you’ except this time they haven’t refrained from using accurate (“terfy?”) vocabulary like ‘penis’ and ‘scrotum’. Their audacity has no bounds!

Jo Brown #fundie pinknews.co.uk

(=A Homophobic Commentor am sing why they where banned from a Gay Christians Blog=)

Jo Brown: Why did you block me from commenting on your blog Kimberly? I read you Comment Covenant and did not break any of its rules, but I did notice that you didn't stick to the process that would eventually lead to someone being blocked. (ie: What happened to the gentle warning?) I tried to get a message to you via the "contact us" link on your blog's host, with my reply to your comment, plus an add-on comment I wrote once I realised I couldn't post that reply due to you having blocked me. I don't know if that message will get to you.
My comments were cordial, but I suspect your bias prevents you from seeing that. By blocking me, it shows you aren't willing to accept others as you would like to be accepted yourself.

Kimberly Knight: Because my blog is akin to a table in my home and I would not permit anyone to sit at my table and abuse me or my guests. I have encountered way too many abusive trolls like yourself with way more time than grace on your hands to allow you to take over and spread your fear and loathing via my site. If you want to write your own blog, please feel free but you are in no way welcome at my table. Your comments were ANYTHING BUT cordial but thank you so much for giving me this opportunity to share my voice with even more readers. I will not respond to anything you post in any other forum whatsoever so I hope you find someone else's work to obsess over. For those who would like to check out my blog called Coming Out Christian you can find it at the following link: www.patheos.com/blogs/kimbe...

Thanks Jo!

Jo Brown: In that case, you're a coward Kimberly. You can't handle someone who doesn't fully agree with you. You can't even point out how exactly someone's post is "full of fear and loathing" or "unintelligent and ignorant". It is noteworthy that you never addressed any of the things I said, but merely engaged in an attack on me, and then took the coward's way out by blocking me so that I could not reply to you. You wrote a Comment Covenant with loads of platitudes about how we're all supposed to be nice and respectful of each other's viewpoint, and then you violate your own covenant by blocking me without warning, and adding a pious "peace be with you" greeting at the end. How hypocritical! Would Jesus act that way? Is that the way to act if you want acceptance? Is that how you build bridges? You're a fraud Kimberly, and your blog is nothing but a sycophant's club. You're not interested in debate, only in words that mollify your internal self-doubts. That's also why you cannot interpret my post in any way other than as an attack from someone who supposedly fears and loathes you. It seems from this that you want to be feared and loathed. You and the sycophantic commenters in your blog have the most obvious cognitive dissonance I have ever witnessed in a group of people. If your aim was to leave a feeling of distaste in people who encounter you, you have certainly achieved that goal. You won't win respect and acceptance from the non-gay community if you continue to act this way.

DAVIS M.J. Aurini #sexist staresattheworld.com

Why Ghostbusters Was Doomed from the Start


It wasn’t a bad script that killed Ghostbusters (2016); the movie was doomed from the start.

BassFzz’s Video: My Problem With “Empowered” Female Characters

The new Ghostbusters film hasn’t even been released yet, and it’s already turning into a disaster. Audiences are panning the trailers, heads are rolling at Sony, and the Director – Paul Feig – is blaming it all on misogyny.

The problems with this film should have been obvious from the beginning. There’s a reason audiences have reacted so negatively, even before rumours of the lame duck script were released. It’s not just that they got the music wrong, turning 80s synth into modern orchestral; it’s not just that the outfits look dumpy, and the jokes are lame; there’s a far more fundamental problem which poisoned this film from the get go, which no amount of creativity could have compensated for.

The problem with Ghostbusters 2016 is that main cast is all women.

Now am I saying that an all-female cast in a comedy-adventure movie aimed at general audiences is an inevitable death knell? Am I confirming Feig’s accusations of misogyny, that audiences are just angry because they can’t deal with strong, female characters?

No; not at all. In fact, if you took the four women playing the ghostbusters and put them into another film it could have been incredibly successful; in fact, the 2011 comedy Bridesmaids had much of the same cast, and the same Director, and it was received extremely well; if, instead of Ghostbusters, the four of them had starred in a sequel to, say, Jumanji – just imagine it, the same four actresses fighting off giant insects and killer plants, while the Great White Hunter comes after them, hating them for no reason at all – that could have worked, as a comedy, as an adventure, and it wouldn’t have traipsed all over the good will from the Robin Williams film.

So is the problem that this is a transparent, feminist reboot? Taking a beloved IP, sex-swapping the lead roles, and pretending that this somehow makes women empowered? Not exactly. While it’s certainly a blatant slap in the face to audiences, that’s nothing more than the icing atop a concept that was fatally flawed from the beginning.

The reason Ghostbusters doesn’t work with a female cast is because at the core it is a male story.

Now I’d like to step back for a moment and consider the term “Strong Female Character”; my colleague Zarius has a video where he discusses this topic at length, and he uses the term “Strong Female Character” to mean Good female character; it’s a great video, and I definitely recommend that you check it out. But I’d like to go in a different direction, and consider the specific words that are being used. Strong Female Character as opposed to Powerful Female Character.

Strength – physical strength – is one of the defining aspects of masculinity. When you contrast the sexes, there’s no contest; the average man is stronger than 95% of women; and even female bodybuilders don’t get much stronger than your part-time gym rat. This is why hitting women is such a universal taboo. We expect men to use their physical strength to protect women – not abuse them.

Somebody who’s strong is somebody who’s powerful – but strength isn’t the only form of power. In Game of Thrones neither Tyrion nor Varys are strong physically – Tyrion because of his dwarfism, Varys because he was gelded – and yet both of them are powerful and admirable despite their physical weakness.

This is why I find the phrase “Strong Female Characters” so interesting; it sets women up to fail, competing in an arena where men are the superior sex – or it requires that they be “Empowered” by the director, who winds up giving superhuman abilities to 120 lb Scarlet Johansson. This results in cognitive dissonance for the audience. In Avengers, Black Widow is tough enough to beat up hardened Russian Mobsters at the beginning of the movie – but later on, when we see her fight Hawkeye, every healthy, well-adjusted person in the audience is subconsciously outraged that this big man is beating a tiny woman.

Strength isn’t the only difference between the sexes, though it’s one of the most obvious; men and women differ in so many ways – in complementary ways! Each sex is specialized to work well with the other; men are good at some things, women are good at different things, and trying to judge either sex by the standards of their complement isn’t just foolish; it’s dehumanizing.

So let’s return to Ghostbusters – the Real Ghostbusters from 1984. What’s this movie really about? When you strip away all of the makeup – the setting, the ghosts, the gags, and the big name actors – what is the kernel of narrative that you find?

It’s a movie about four friends putting together a start-up business, and the difficulties they have to deal with – both from clients, and from regulators.

This is a masculine story at its core. Not because women are incapable of inventing a proton-pack; not because men have better instincts for what sort of businesses will succeed; the reason it’s a masculine story is because of the psychological inheritance we received from our ancestors.

Men evolved to go out and prove themselves to women; to take big risks, to bite off more than they can chew. Women evolved to find security in the home environment so that they could raise their children securely. Women who took risks wound up failing the test of evolution; so did the men who played it safe. Because of this our ancestors were the risk-taking men, who would do something like gamble on Ghostbusting being successful; and our ancestors were the cautious women, who would rather achieve a stable income on etsy, even if that means that they’ll never hit it big.

Furthermore; we tend to have more sympathy for women than we do for men; we’re more likely to give them help when they encounter difficulty. There are good evolutionary reasons for this (reasons that are so obvious I won’t even bother mentioning them), but when it comes to Ghostbusters this innate empathy undermines the conflict. In the original film, Walter Peck – the EPA regulator – was an antagonist we loved to hate; but he wasn’t a villain. At the end of the day he was just another man doing his job, even if he went about it foolishly, and his anger at the ghostbusters was comedic.

Replace Dan Aykroyd with Melissa McCarthy, however, and we’re right back to Hawkeye acting like a wife beater; what was once a funny pissing match between a couple of guys, is now an abusive misogynist who doesn’t want women to succeed.

For most people the differences between the sexes are so obvious that they wind up being difficult for us to even notice. Are men and women equal? Of course they are! What sort of savage would say otherwise? Should you treat a gentleman in the same manner that you’d treat a lady? Why of course not, what an absurd suggestion! This is all so obvious to us, on a subconscious level, that when something like Ghostbusters 2016 shows up on our radar, we just know it’s wrong, even if we can’t quite orchestrate why. So if that’s the case – how did Sony fail to realize that this was a disaster from the beginning?

It’s time we looked at the Director, Paul Feig. In a 2015 interview with Variety, he discussed how his world had been female-centric from a young age; how he never learned about masculinity from a father who was always working. In another interview with Hollywood Reporter, he made a point of saying that his favourite colour is purple.

According to Feig, his world has been female-centric from an early age. Growing up in Michigan an only child, and with a father busy running a surplus store, he spent a lot of time with his mother. “Most of my friends growing up were either women or sensitive guys like myself,” he notes. Though his last name is pronounced “Feeg,” its close enough to a gay slur that boys his age teased him. “You know how guy comedy is,” he says. “They would call me names and punch me. And I would think, ‘I don’t enjoy this male bonding!’ And I hated the locker room, because that’s where I got beaten up.”

It is clear that Feig is a man who’s deeply confused about the sexes. Not because he’s a dandy necessarily – Oscar Wilde was a dandy, and he had a very deep understanding of the sexes – but because from the earliest ages he was encouraged to identify with the female, to seek female primacy.

He was a boy raised to be a woman; and now that he is a man, he takes his malformed, stunted understanding of masculinity, and projects it onto the other sex. He wants to see women as saviours, as soldiers, as successful in business; he wants a woman who will continue to over-mother him, protecting and providing for him. His latent masculine instincts are screaming that he ought to be protecting and providing – but because he never grew up, he projects those roles on to women.

In their review of Star Wars prequels, Red Letter Media pointed out that the biggest failure of those movies was that they didn’t tell a human story. Audiences couldn’t relate to the characters on the screen, and so once the dazzle of the special effects faded, there was little left to care about.

Man is the story telling animal; all of our narratives are built off of rules and tropes embedded deep in our subconscious. The reason that “Rescue the Princess” is a theme you find throughout all cultures, is because women have always been attracted to men who are strong enough to defend them. When you flip the sexes, putting a woman in place to rescue a man, the romance at the end of the story evaporates. Instead of fighting to rescue a lover – she is fighting to rescue her younger brother.

Everybody understands this, even if they can’t put it into words; and when you present them with a narrative that’s broken from the get go, they can all sense that something’s wrong, even if they can’t put their finger on it. Both Paul Feig and Amy Pascal, the Chairman of Sony Pictures, are deeply sexually confused, and as such are obsessed with forcing female bodies into character roles designed for men. They want to see a strong princess go and rescue a weak man and then fall in love with him – to everybody else’s disgust.

It wasn’t a bad script that killed this movie; it wasn’t problems during production; and it certainly wasn’t fear or hatred of women. What doomed this movie from day one was the deep set mental illness of Feig and Pascal. Rather than crafting a good film, they tried to force their sickness into the world; twisting reality with contradictions, and demanding that reality accommodate them. They went against the logic of the human soul, and because of that, Ghostbusters was doomed from the start.

pfcan91 #fundie reddit.com

This is one aspect where the dork/nerd stereotype about asians is correct. Asians don't know how to interact with normal people for the most part. Asians always try to artificially conform, but they can never do it quite right, because their very low levels of social intelligence limits them. Hapas have higher emotional and social intelligence relative to full-Asians, so they know what Full-Asians are like, but at the same time, they know that their Asian genes specifically restrict them from being normal. It's a state of cognitive dissonance.

Cameron Prosser #conspiracy debunkingmandelaeffects.com

Please try to debunk this. I would love to see you try.

I’ve been doing research on the Mandela Effect and it’s causes, and I came across the average Berenst-in Bears and Star Wars topics, which were believable, but didn’t hit home for me. But what has me convinced that this phenomenon is actually occurring is when I was reading posts on Reddit.

I came across a post that said “Marilyn Monroe’s Mole?”.

This is the exact moment I realized it’s not a “mis-attribution of memory” or a “cognitive dissonance”. I know for a matter of fact my prior timestream was changed, and I’m sure you will know too. There’s a piercing called the “Monroe”, (Look it up), which people always seem to be getting on their upper right/left lip. I even have a friend of mine who has the piercing herself. Also, I personally have a mole on my upper lip myself, and in grade school my buddies would call me “Marilyn” as a joke. Apparently now in this new timestream, Marilyn Monroe’s mole is on her upper cheek. I know for a MATTER OF FACT that previous to this timestream change that her mole was indeed ON HER UPPER LIP.

David Docetad #sexist discourse.codinghorror.com

It is supremely ironic that the only place progressives reject the benefits of gender diversity is marriage. Nothing can make a marriage more diverse, in a truly meaningful way, than a man and woman (except an interracial marriage! – which makes beautiful children too!). For progressives a woman, as a female member of the human species, brings untold benefits to an all-male corporate boardroom, to an all-male congress, to a student body, to an all-male workforce. But a woman brings nothing (nothing at all!) to a marriage. To deny this is to condemn same sex marriage to second class status. There is only one way to eliminate this cognitive dissonance, and that this to call into question and then destroy very concept of male and female itself. And as night follows day this is happening. It is no accident that the transgender activists leapt into action as soon same-sex marriage became accepted. These activists are not just looking for a safe, private place to use the bathroom. The very labels male and female, men and women, ladies gentlemen are anathema to them and must be destroyed. For example at Vassar College, the transgender activists are not satisfied with additional single use bathrooms that the college has provided - they deface the bathroom doors by taping over the men and women signs. At campuses nationwide there is an assault on the English language itself with respect to pronouns. At Michigan, students can request a pronoun of choice, and professors can be disciplined for not using it. This is a logical outcome of same-sex marriage. Indeed it is an attempt at a post-implementation fix for a flawed concept.

Luke Stranahan #fundie returnofkings.com

image

The American Presidential election looms ever closer, with the liberal candidate Hillary Clinton seeming to still win the (rigged?) polls despite ever increasing scandals. I want to use today’s space to examine some of the apparent inconsistencies of the left, the underlying motivations of their views, and how those views are fundamentally incompatible with the ideas of us here at Return Of Kings.

Modern liberalism, or leftism if you prefer, possesses several contradictions that make it seem logically impossible to hold all their ideas at one time in your head without suffering from an extreme case of cognitive dissonance. Whether it be simultaneously embracing the gay rights movement and feminism while having sympathy for fundamentalist Muslims, or how you can be for gun control to save all the toddlers who were lucky enough to survive your pro-abortion policies, any liberal platform point is so weak that any rational person sees his point made and won with no effect at all; the lefty simple rattles on to their next talking point without having the good sense to know that they lost.

How can someone have an unreasonable political philosophy that is self-defeating and irrational and still hold their head up as a person of sense? They can’t, and the reason that they appear to do so is because we are mistaking modern day liberalism as a movement of rational thought and philosophy.

It’s not. It’s a religion. More accurately, it’s a cult.

[...]

What can you do?

You can’t reason with a fanatic. The greatest debates are had when there is either no proof, or there is, but one or more sides will simply not listen. We can extol conservative or libertarian values all day long and point out how they are backed up by reality, but, if they are blinded, they will not see.

If Trump wins, do not gloat to these people, for their machine will take a long time to dismantle, and even a headless snake is dangerous. If Clinton wins, do not lament around them either, for you merely mark yourself as a target.

The best thing to do is to get people of the left out of your life the best you can. Friendships can be stopped, and acquaintances through social activities can be distilled down to only interactions of that activity, though you should really ask yourself if a hobby that is shared with liberals is really worth keeping. Same thing with churches, although it is hard to find a church that is still traditional and not yet corrupted by feminism and liberalism.

Work will be a difficult one. We have covered being in a “man’s field” before, and that helps to a degree. Beyond that, simply not speaking with leftist coworkers other than necessary conversations for business should be your goal, and this will go double if you have one for a boss.

Conclusion

We’re in a transitory stage between reasonable and friendly disagreement and open physical violence being the norm. Open sabotage and various legal and illegal acts used by the left against their ideological foes is the order of the day.

We must be hard targets against the hate of the left, as there is nothing that a liberal hates more than a successful, middle-class, white, Christian, straight man. Do not allow them access to any vulnerabilities, but do not draw attention to yourself either. Great forces are at play during these current times, much can be accomplished by simply stepping out of the way at the right time.

willyloman #conspiracy willyloman.wordpress.com

The “brave Malala” story is completely fake just like the Jessica Lynch story, just like the Nurse Nayirah story, just like the Nada story from Iran. It’s a marketing campaign, selling war via emotional contextualism dependent on high levels of cognitive dissonance. In other words;

“we need to act to have our Peace Prize “winning” president commit to sending MORE drones and bombers into Pakistan to blow up a lot of innocent little girls because the evil Taliban shot ONE little girl in the head.. and by the way… she’s just fine because the military which we fund has been all over the case since the moment it began… and by the way don’t think about that up-coming election or that anti-drone protest building in Pakistan or that Peace Pipeline that is about to have construction started on it by our new-old arch rivals, the Russians.”

That’s the nature of political discourse in America these days. They get some Madison Avenue hotshot to come up with the same old tired bullshit (Gay Girl from Damascus anyone?) and they fully expect us to swallow it without a second thought. It’s ridiculous, it’s insulting, but it’s all they have. They want that pipeline stopped and they’ll sink to any low to see that they have a justification for doing it.

And thus our little “grief stricken” mouthpiece has a new role to play; neoliberal near martyr of the Global Free Market Wars.

UPDATE: Jan noticed something in one of the photos on CNN which I linked to. Check out the young person (or shorter person) walking behind the man in the white at the rear of the group. She’s wearing the same color pants and shawl as Malala in the other photos and it seems that the gurney they are using to carry her to the waiting chopper is empty. Did she and her father walk onto that chopper and someone screwed up when editing the photo?

Various incels #sexist reddit.com

(OP by dontcryimalreadydead)
Female contradictions and hypocrisy
image

(xxxrivenmainxxx)
femaloids and bluepillers are walking cognitive dissonances. Their brain consists of self contradicting platittudes

(Spiritingz)
The past is really only the past for women. Men need some kind of resume.

(itsjustnotfairwhy)
women are stupid and have no souls

they feel absolutely nothing when lying

(PajeetIsManlet)
Femoids are worthless sacks of meat. They are nothing but walking life support for their vaginas which is why they only think with their tingles.

(acenosk ("Incel Fundamentalist"))
100% true

(lifefailuer ("Now officially volcel (I have rejected sex)"))
This is absolutely gold. How can females not see this or are they all just stupid?

(ElliotsSecondAscent)
Excellent post.

inb4 a dumb bluepilled normie says "it's not the same person saying those things"

NeanderthalDNA #racist amren.com

Well the level of cognitive dissonance is hilarious.

Well, sure, Blacks have been disproportionately violent for ever. What do you expect you racists!!! Ha ha!

Or what, liblefties? We Whites DESERVE this so stop whining? THAT is also a factor in their smugness.

I'd love to play this little game with the liblefty punditocracy. Bet I could knock out most of 'em with one punch as good as a negro!

christdependent #fundie christiandiscussionforums.org

phobia is a psychological term denoting irrational fear. Which is exactly why it's being used by homosexual activists in their self-admitted propaganda campaign, as one of the two labels they use to create cognitive dissonance. The other term is "homohatred", which we also see lobbed onto cyber discussion boards and other media with reckless and gleeful abandon.

That's how propaganda works.

NotedScholar #crackpot #racist sciencedefeated.wordpress.com

The Three Thousand Year Reich of Negative Numbers (part one)

The curious reader might be interested to know that Diophantus and the Greek thinkers rejected the concept of negative numbers (and irrational numbers, of course) as “patently ridiculous” and “idiotic.” And we are a Greek-based society. So to borrow David Hume’s plaintive question – Then whence Negative Numbers? The answer to this question lies in the Orient. If there was ever a “yellow menace,” negative numbers are it. The Chinese, the Indians, and the Muslims gave us negative numbers. Not the superior Greeks. Is this a coincidence? I think not. These countries have had a vested interest in the concept from the very beginning.

Fortunately, however, negative numbers are behind a very thin conceptual veil. Once removed, it is easy to see the “Chinaman behind the curtain.” I’ll just say QUED ahead of time. Observe:

I can have three horses, but I cannot have negative three horses. Some people, suffering from Cognitive Dissonance (CD), suggest that “debt” is a manifestation of negative numbers. But that’s really just arguing semantics. Wittgenstein and Derrida disproved semantics back in the 20th century. In any case, what’s really going on in the situation is not that I have negative horses; rather, I owe some positive horses (Positive horses=horses that exist; countable horses. Who would want to be owed imaginary horses?). We can get by just fine without negative numbers. Besides, the Universe is full of stuff, not -stuff. If you would like to confirm this, here is the relevant empirical experiment:

Turn your head this way and that, and look at things. You may if you wish do this in a lab, for a more sciencey feel.
This conclusion, in conjunction with the abolition of infinity, has pathbreaking – nay, watershed – consequences for the number line, which now looks like this:

image

I constantly get compliments for how incredibly parsimonious my arguments are – well, this one perhaps beats them all!

If the abolition of negative numbers in the conceptual schema catches on in the West, we can expect an end to the Three Thousand Year Reich of the Neo-Zoroastrians who think that the number line is an exact balance between negative and positive (seriously, what are the chances anyway that it would be an exact balance? It’s even worse than 1/Penultimate. It’s zero!). Now some might say that empirically the Universe is symmetrical, and they might cite anti-matter as confirmation of this. But there is not room here to discuss anti-matter; I’ll leave that for a future post!

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: IT user accidentally gets it

image

(TheColdColdAbyss)

I think deep down, once you're exposed to the black pill you can't ever get rid of it. It's simply the most logical and scientifically sound theory for human attraction, and every human intuitively knows it's true.

These soymales don't like it because it can be offensive to muh ladies. But deep down they know it's true.

(donkeyponkey)

this is essentially why incels are hated more than laughed at. if you're a flat earther, normies will laugh at you because they know you're wrong and pathetic. but incels are instead loathed, despised, scorned etc. due to the discomfort the cognitive dissonance causes.

(TheColdColdAbyss)

Exactly. Uncomfortable truths provoke denial, rage, grief, all sorts of negative feelings that these cucks want to avoid at all costs, therefore they stay stuck in perpetual denial.

Fucking pathetic.

(FACEandLMS)

I'm just gonna point out that the "attracted to good genetics" thing is what incels are constantly saying, and people here are constantly denying (which by the way is why the title of that post is "girls don't care about jawli-", because that is something said a billion times over in this subreddit and elsewhere)

You're literally saying incels are right lol

​Haha ok I’ll delete!

This right before the post was deleted lmao.

This needs to be stickied. What a female-tier own-goal AND backtrack. "Oops, I agreed with the incels! I take it back. I'll delete my thread!" You can tell it was a woman who posted it cuz of 1: the lack of self-awareness, 2: the agreeableness to delete the thread. If not a woman then definately a MTF.

(donkeyponkey)

You can tell it was a woman who posted it cuz of

the agreeableness to delete the thread

holy shit, this is true and a bit mind blowing. I didn't even understand how the fuck could a person do such a 180 and pretend like they never said what they did. it felt absurd to me as a man, but realizing it was a woman behind the screen certainly explains it. the sheep mentality of women is on another level.

Maximus #fundie mattforney.com

I am asking you, dear reader, to put away the most destructive preconceptions about human nature and society that “modern” Western culture (our true culture was lost decades ago) has ever produced in man’s history: feminism, gender equality and the so-called oppressive evils of man and his so-called patriarchal nature.

I will present to you new facts and ideas whose only chance of a fair hearing will be if you put away every modern, Western, secular, religious, right-vs.-left, capitalist-vs.-socialist world view of the very real Matrix of lies and deceit that guide your every thought and decision in your life in this, the “modern and advanced” age of the 21st century.

Some of the cognitive dissonance challenges you will face in discarding your preconceptions of the world will entail contemplating the following:

The paradox that as supposedly equal as men and women are, the new scientific discoveries of genetics, biology and psychology of the recent 20 years is showing this to be a complete lie: males and females, man and woman, are 100 percent different in every way.
That much of what the ancients and folklore had to say about the sexes is being proven true by science.
That these differences between the sexes is not one of quality, but of specific kind. Qualitatively, the sexes are equally human. In kind, that is in their thinking and behaviour, we are not even on the same planet. Mars and Venus do have their separate and distinct orbits of existence apparently.
That to acknowledge these new truths is to acknowledge the profound consequences our currently false social, political and ideological 21st century paradigms are having on our children’s future happiness—nay, their very survival, right now, in the most disturbing and depressing of ways.
That acceptance of these new facts is going to require the biggest act of courage both men and women have ever faced in their evolutionary history. That we are going to finally have to work together as respectful partners, not equals, in the continuation of the human race and civilized society.
That to continue to deny this… to continue to embrace the politics of feminism and “equality” will, and is already in evidence, be the utter death and destruction of the entire human race as we rapidly approach the point of a uni-culture.

Some of the new facts and ideas you are going to have to evaluate and consider are:

That man, the male, is a miracle and the sole source of evolutionary creation in the universe.
That differences in thought, word and deed between the sexes is hardwired and naturally ordained.
That these sexual differences evolved for our happiness and proper functioning in order to continue to evolve the human race toward greater interconnectedness and intellectual and spiritual development.
That the male is responsible for Darwin’s evolutionary propagation of all sexually reproducing life forms on earth.
That the female is responsible for selecting new innovational, evolutionary paths and in a way only her feminine, whimsical, capricious and fanciful nature could possibly produce.
That man’s transition from cave to castle—the beginning of civilization—was only possible because of the sexual restraint and restriction of woman’s raw sexual power.
That in restraining and restricting woman’s sexuality, man’s innate creative talents were unleashed, birthing to the world the very philosophies, religions and politics that make the world the increasingly complex (and therefore higher evolved) state that modern, secular and effeminate man is now on the brink of destroying.
That the economic, social and political chaos in the world today is due to the lack of real men and women doing their part to restrain their more base and animal natures (which is why the elite encourage our debasement and debauchery on every flip of the media channel) .
- That the feminist definition of man and the theory of patriarchy is patently false and is in truth, a projection of woman’s violent, controlling and destructive nature onto men.
That patriarchy is the natural evolution of the human race in terms of social organization and is the only form that will push man to even higher levels of spiritual, intellectual and social complexity and advancement.
That unless we undo the past 50 to 100 years of feminist lies and propaganda demonizing men and masculinity, we will be returning to the caves and much of the world’s knowledge and wisdom will be lost for all time, until man once again learns to say no to woman’s neverending demands to serve the selfish needs of her and her progeny to the detriment of all.

LaurenceMorton #conspiracy express.co.uk

There is NOT one scrap of evidence that would stand up in a court of law that 9/11 was carried out by a man (on dialysis) living in a cave with a laptop - Osama Bin Laden AKA Tim Osman, CIA agent and stooge for 25 years - and 19 Arabs, 7 of whom called the BBC on the following day to say that they were alive and kicking LOL! However. . . . . . .there is a mountain of evidence that it was a MIHOP False Flag event, not only to start the eternal 'War on Terror' and create a new 'Bogie Man'

Oooooohhhh be afraid, be very afraid of the new Bogie Man .....Muslims, (Communism no longer valid since Glasnost) but to demolish the WTC, which was redundant because of asbestos. The article omits to mention that WTC7 was NOT hit by a plane and fell at freefall acceleration for 2.5 seconds. This is NOT possible by office fires as we heard from disinfo agents NIST, if steel framed buildings fell down because of office fires, why would we need demolition companies? Start researching now without cognitive dissonance controlling your mind but beware of 9/11 shills and disinfo. Follow your heart to the real truth - if you have got the balls!

Martin #fundie premierchristianity.com

Tom Walker: "What we observe is not Evolution, even in a small scale"
Yes, it is. I understand it and the body of evidence well enough to tell you it is. You don't. Out of more than 100 million scientifically educated folks with advanced degrees, a few thousand think you are right and the rest mostly ignore you as being insane.
When the world's experts tell you it is, and you deny it thinking that you know better than they do, that is a) almost certainly wrong and b) incredibly arrogant. Delusional by definition (delusions of grandeur).
You followed this up by telling me that you do accept evidence. No, you don't. I bet you hardly know the evidence and I further bet that you exclusively rely on religious sources or authors (including some scientifically degreed ones) for your scientific information. When you think that you can decide what evidence is good and which is not, you have broken the line between reality and delusion.
YOU do not get to decide which data is good. Data is just data and it does not respond to opinion.
The evidence I rely on is understood by me from the first experiment to the last, with years of study at the college level. I do not re-interpret it to make it fit what I think, I model what I think based on the data. When the data is updated my "beliefs" are updated whereas yours are not. That should be a clear sign of a problem - but it is one that I bet you can't see.
You likely think all Catholics and the Pope aren't Christian (they are and they out number you by a lot) and that the Bible is a great source of real world information (it isn't.) You might think the Bible is inerrant (which is insanity writ large). Such a framework is delusional when compared to real world material. Look up "cognitive dissonance" and think about this: If proof was a rock and it was set on the table in front of you - and you agreed it was real data and correct - would you be able to leave your belief system and adapt? Probably not. You could not leave a crafted world view behind, nor could you risk family, friends, peers and community over it. Look up Kurt Wise. Church and anti-evolution religious sites say in advance that their minds cannot be changed, which is stupidity on a plate.
Scientifically minded people do not operate that way. They change what they know in keeping with best current data. Prove me wrong and I will THANK YOU for it and update my world view.
That I can do that and you cannot should be a loud siren of warning

Martin: Tom
So demonstrate Evolution. Start with the LUCA and create the variety of life we see.
There is not one iota of evidence to support Evolution, you are whistling in the dark.
BTW, the reason I can say the Pope isn't a Christian is because the Bible says salvation is by grace through faith alone and the Pope rejects that.

Dave Hodges #conspiracy thecommonsenseshow.com

When retired FBI agent, the now deceased Ted Gunderson, reportedly told a gathering of militia members that the federal government had set up 1,000 internment camps across the country, I had no trouble believing his statement because there is ample documentation to support his statement (e.g. REX 84, Operation Garden Plot and now the NDAA). However, when Gunderson reported that the federal government was storing over 500,000 caskets outside of Atlanta, I also knew he was accurate on this point because Sherrie Wilcox found the evidence in the adjacent photo. However, when I heard that Gunderson was accusing the government of storing 30,000 guillotines, I thought he had lost his mind.

Why Would the Government Want to Store Guillotines?

Gunderson told various patriot groups that the guillotines were being stored for the day that the government declares martial law and moves in to round up and execute American dissenters. Gunderson prophetically told patriot groups that the federal government was going to keep track of all of us. The last statement has indeed proven accurate given the recent Snowden/NSA scandal.

Can somebody please explain to me why the government would need to order 30,000 guillotines? For what legitimate purpose could these tools of execution be utilized?

Off With Their Heads

guillotine 1The guillotine was invented by a Frenchman named Dr. Guillotine. The guillotine reached the height of its popularity when it was mainly used in the French Revolution to eliminate any potential opposition from people with “dangerous ideas.”

The guillotine has never been used inside of the United States. The United States has executed people by firing squad, hanging, the electric chair and lethal injection. The US has never executed a convicted criminal through the use of the guillotine.

Given these facts, then why in God’s good name would this government import 30,000 guillotines as Gunderson claimed? Oh, I know that some of the sheep are now looking up from the ground and have just said “there aren’t are any guillotines in the United States.” Then please tell me, sheep of America, why did Representative Doug Teper, of the Georgia Legislative Assembly (Democrat) introduced a bill which will supplant the method of execution, the electric chair, with the guillotine?

Organ Harvesting?
Doug Teper (D)
Doug Teper (D)

Have you ever heard the allegations which accuse some doctors, primarily in China, of killing patients in order to sell their organs on the black market? After you read the following paragraphs, you may conclude that those rumors are true. When Representative Teper was asked about his motivation to exclusively use the guillotine to execute death row inmates, he said, it would allow for death-row inmates as organ donors. The very spooky Teper further reasoned that the “Blade makes a clean cut and leaves vital organs intact.” I will be happy to let this statement speak for itself. Below is a draft of the legislation.

HB 1274 – Death penalty; guillotine provisions
SECTION 1.
1- 8 The General Assembly finds that while prisoners condemned to
1- 9 death may wish to donate one or more of their organs for
1-10 transplant, any such desire is thwarted by the fact that
1-11 electrocution makes all such organs unsuitable for
1-12 transplant. The intent of the General Assembly in enacting
1-13 this legislation is to provide for a method of execution
1-14 which is compatible with the donation of organs by a
1-15 condemned prisoner.
SECTION 2.
1-16 Article 2 of Chapter 10 of Title 17 of the Official Code of
1-17 Georgia Annotated, relating to the death penalty generally,
1-18 is amended by striking in its entirety Code Section
1-19 17-10-38, relating to death sentences generally, and
1-20 inserting in lieu thereof the following:
1-21 “17-10-38. (Index)
1-22 (a) All persons who have been convicted of a capital
1-23 offense and have had imposed upon them a sentence of death
1-24 shall, at the election of the condemned, suffer such
1-25 punishment either by electrocution or by guillotine. If
1-26 the condemned fails to make an election by the thirtieth
1-27 day preceding the date scheduled for execution, punishment
1-28 shall be by electrocution.
1-29 (b) In all cases in which the defendant is sentenced to be
1-30 electrocuted executed, it shall be the duty of the trial
1-31 judge in passing sentence to direct that the defendant be
-1- (Index)
LC 21 3643
2- 1 delivered to the Department of Corrections for
2- 2 electrocution execution at a state correctional
2- 3 institution designated by the department.”
SECTION 3.
2- 4 Said article is further amended by striking in its entirety
2- 5 Code Section 17-10-44, relating to death chamber apparatus
2- 6 and related matters, and inserting in lieu thereof the
2- 7 following:
2- 8 “17-10-44. (Index)
2- 9 The Department of Corrections shall provide a death
2-10 chamber and all necessary apparatus, machinery, and
2-11 appliances for inflicting the penalty of death by
2-12 electrocution or by guillotine.”

Where would the proposed Georgia Legislature guillotines have come from unless Gunderson was correct in that 15,000 are being stored in Montana and 15,000 are being stored in Georgia?

An Efficient Killing Machine
Has anyone bothered to do the math? A single guillotine reportedly can chop off the heads of about 100 people per hour. In one hour, the federal government has the capacity to execute as many as three million people. In one ten hour day, 30 million people could be executed by way of the guillotine.

Other Alphabet Soup Agents Speak Out
Annie DeRiso and Bill Pawelec
Annie DeRiso and Bill Pawelec

Ted Gunderson is not the only former alphabet soup agent to tell all about guillotines. The late Bill Pawelec, ex-CIA, was a close friend of mine and eventually became the significant other of the News Director for The Common Sense Show, Annie DeRiso. Pawelec told both Annie and I on several occasions that guillotines were being stored on several military bases. The late A.C. Griffith, ex-NSA, said the same on more than one occasion on my talk show. In light of these confirmations from known and from public sources, as well as the proposed legislation of Rep. Teper to introduce the use of guillotines on American soil, I believe that there is no question that the story is true.

Implications
dhs vehicle We already know that the Department of Homeland Security has purchased 2.2 billion rounds of ammunition to go with their purchase of 2700 armored personnel carriers. Do you realize that this is enough ammo to fight a war for about seven years and that there are enough DHS personnel carriers to allocate over 50 per state? Can you imagine if they were concentrated in their distribution patterns? This would be the equivalent of an invading army as DHS goes from house to house and seizes dissidents by the millions and America will soon have their own version of the French Revolution

Since this story broke, I have asked the question why guillotines? I have talked to several of my off-the-record sources and the consensus is frightening. Everyone that I have spoken to agrees that the guillotine is highly efficient. Most everyone I have talked with stated that organ harvesting will indeed be even a bigger business and the guillotine is the most efficient killing machine to that end. Some of my sources stated that the next phase of the transhumanism experiments and developments requires a severed human head to facilitate the mixing of humans and animals into one sentient being. Further, futuristic DARPA robots will have human heads after the initial purge and subsequent executions (see photo below). This makes sense because after the head is severed, the eyes blink and signs of life continue for up to a minute. This would allow a team to “freeze”and to preserve the head for whatever purpose. And just as frightening, I was told that some of Satanic rituals require severed human heads and we know the global elite, in large part, are indeed Satanists.

Can you tell the real person from the DARPA produced robot? Will human looking robots replace human slaves?
Can you tell the real person from the DARPA produced robot? Will human looking robots replace interim human slaves?

I can understand people being skeptical about the guillotines because my first reaction was to reject the notion under my personal veil of cognitive dissonance. Yet, the emerging facts speak for themselves.

Although I did not know Gunderson personally, I did know Bill Pawelec as a close friend and I was well acquainted with Griffith. And even if Pawelec and Griffith were jointly mistaken on this issue, how would one explain away Teper’s efforts to introduce the guillotine into the Georgia justice system?

The end game implications are frightening. When we add the topic of guillotines to what we already know about 2.2 billion rounds of DHS ammo and 2700 armored DHS personnel carriers, why should this be so hard to believe? How can take the fact that DHS has armed to the teeth against Americans and are planning to murder us in horrific ways as anything but a declaration of war?

Be prepared to be shocked as you watch the following chilling report on the possession and intent of the military with regard to the use of guillotines.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujX8evzRXN0

actuallybrazilian #sexist reddit.com

most women are more far emotional than rational. as such that s their priority

everyone acts based on perceived reality but their distortion of reality is bigger, since it s more about what she wants it to be instead of wrong facts like it happens with deluded men.

as such everything else is no surprise: argue with logic with a women? you are actually attacking her, since she has big emotional investment in the thing you trying to say it s false. absurd amounts of antidepressants and meme reactions to things that in a first analysis do not deserve that? a result of having to deal with absurd cognitive dissonance and other people opinions being threats, not helping things to reach the truth.

being judgmental? sure, you have to for other people opinions not reach you and do negative damage to your feelings. inferiority and superiority complex? all about feelings, it can be lookism, when a chad trying something raises her opinion of herself and a incel doing the same decreases it, it can be about having to deal with the artificial thing that s women with authority, this deserves a topic for itself.

attacking weaker people? it s fine, if it makes ou feel good.

it does not matter to them that they are a mess as much as if other people think they are a mess. it s all about OTHERS make her feel, since most feelings are reactive.

society never forces women to keep their feelings in check like men. as such the '' women are children '' thing perpetuate in forums that discuss women. sure there s a natural component but most of it is societal.

it s no wonder modern '' politics '' attract women so much, it s basically a cult of party or personality, it brings a emotional connection between those and the voter which is a abomination efficiency wise. in our modern '' democratic '' societies there are basically cattle ( which is 90% ) that follow one of the cults, players that manipulate where the cattle will go ( those with enough money/time/contacts/etc) to influence enough other people to make a real impact/have their voices heard and irrelevant cattle that for any number of reasons refuse to participate in the game

back2bible #fundie forums.carm.org

What's the dream Bob?.................do you believe the old and new testament authors were ball earth believers?...............your new age philosophy has only come to be believed since the 1500's

Its not what anyone in the bible believed.................that's the fact you can not argue Bob!

when you discover NASA and free Masons are not a trust worthy bunch of people you will begin to see how the wool has been pulled over your eyes...............but you have Cognitive Dissonance on the one hand you want to believe the entire bible but the world has changed what you believe and it stands in contradiction to what the bible clearly teaches.

BBCTheory #sexist reddit.com

Mainstream cognitive dissonance about human reproductive strategy summed up (AKA normie logic)
image
Transscript
Panel 1:
Man observes copulating deer:
"You see, Christians and Muslims, female elk prefer the biggest, strongest males!
Irrefutable proof of evolution!"
Panel 2:
Another man, standing next to two women being all over a hulk of a man:
"Well, gee, /u/CompletelyHonestWithMyself it seems girls kinda, well, like bigger strong men as well."
Panel 3:
Man 1, typing furiously:
"Take that misogynistic bullshit back to misc you bigoted fuck, how dare you say that woman are driven by evo-psych NONSENSE. Pseudo-scientific drivel makes women seem like they are at" [partly visible letters at the bottom of the panel indicate that the rant continues)

dontcryimalreadydead #sexist reddit.com

Female cognitive dissonance: pursuit for a "meaningful" relationship.

1) Complains that men treat her as sex object and wants someone to see her as a person to have a relationship with.

2) Meets a sub 7 male. They share common interests and become close.

3) Friendzones him in pursuit for Chad.

4) Gets pumped and dumped.

5) Go back to step 1.

deano #conspiracy beforeitsnews.com

“You conspiracy theorists”…………well, it just looks like our “conspiracy” has just been confirmed by the MSM. You shills, trolls & debunkers, like yourself & Central Scrutinizer had better look up “Cognitive Dissonance”.
When the “Clucker” (a GALLI priest of the EMERITUS Proffessor kind) tweets, out you all come to show alignment & “Confirmation Bias”. It reminds me of “do-gooder” hallway monitors (prefects) all vying for the teachers approval > Pathetic……………….
OBVIOUSLY, it is going to become visible to all these amatuer astronomers in the near future so they have had to admit it. Just like Galileo’s sun-centred solar system was hidden by the JESUIT priests for nearly 200yrs > it went against the Bible, but telescopic proof was undeniable & they had to finally admit the Truth!!!
If GENESIS is a short summary of the “Babylonian/Marduk” version of the “Enuma Elish”,then seekers of the TRUTH owe it to themselves to read the earlist version of this creation epic & read the SUMERIAN version. Same as “Epic of Gilgamesh” contains the flood story(Babylonian) but the earliest version of the “Astrahasis” mentions a circular Ark & the character called Ziasudra(Noah) >Sumerian version.
If Pluto was still called a Planet, this would make it the TENTH Planet (not 9th) & so fully align with Sitchin’s “The 12th Planet” book, where the SUN & the Moon are counted as well.

“Sitchin is wrong”, is pushed by Michael S. Heiser, who also went to WISCONSIN Uni like the evil Dick CHENEY, many Freemasons (NASA & miltary & politics), & where they get $millions to research EBOLA. A lovely den of indoctrination whose logo is the “Illuminati Eye” & the latin motto “Numen Lumen”> God is light…………………

Whose side are you on now?…..”Your’e either with us, or against us”-Bush Jr. Be careful shills, NOW, you will have to agree with Planet X, or you are the ‘whacko” theorist/denier, & going against the MSM. Funny how you dont defend 9/11 anymore…..the evidence of an inside conspiracy is too damning for even you lot to try & defend……….

Will they name this planet after a ROMAN god? The Enuma Elish used Sumerian gods. The pictures being exposed must be close…..Hubble(Freemason telescope)….or L.U.C.I.F.E.R.(Vatican/Jesuit Telescope in USA) will verify/confirm soon…….but undoubtably this again will be pushed on the “2nd Advent agenda”, Bible Prophecy/Revelation as Wormwood or the Destroyer, & the “Angels(Lyn & Lisa)” or other BIN>Biblically Interperated Nonsense agents will use this as confirmation of Biblical prophecy……more nausea…….

### To Deny Planet X, is to deny MSM & your beloved govt.You have all now become skeptic/debunkers/ conspirators against your govt……you are now classed as terrorists…see how quickly they throw you under the bus?
Enjoy your new tin foil hat, but make it from LEAD> proven protection against Radiation & electro-magnetic thought implants. A LEAD helmet like Magneto of the X Men……….

Enoch 2021 #fundie evolutionfairytale.com

This is a Picture of the Chicago Skyline taken from Grand Mere State Park in Stevensville across Lake Michigan 60 Miles Away ....

image

If we are on a "Ball", with a circumference of 25,000 miles ---

Spherical geometry proves the following elevation loss in all directions from a fixed point observer on a sphere with a 25,000 mile circumference:

1 mile - 8 inches
2 miles - 32 inches
3 miles - 6 feet
4 miles - 10 feet
5 miles - 16 feet
6 miles - 24 feet
7 miles - 32 feet
8 miles - 42 feet
9 miles - 54 feet
10 miles - 66 feet
20 miles - 266 feet
30 miles - 600 feet
40 miles - 1066 feet
50 miles - 1666 feet
60 miles - 2400 feet
70 miles - 3266 feet
80 miles - 4266 feet
90 miles - 5400 feet
100 miles - 6666 feet

That means Chicago should be 2400 Feet BELOW the Horizon (Technically, the Sears Tower is 1454 Feet so...it should still be out of sight by 1,000 feet). Errrr, can somebody please tell me What in The World is going on here ?? :think:

Is this a Mirage? :blink:

And btw, I have another 2,000 examples with most FURTHER than 60 Miles!

So if the Earth is 'spinning' @ 465 meters/second from West to East (1,000 miles an hour) and you're taking a flight from San Diego to New York @ 500 miles per hour, how do you reach your destination before the destination comes screaming up @ 500 miles per hour from your "6" , pray tell??


So if the Earth is 'spinning' @ 465 meters/second from West to East (~ 1,000 miles an hour) --- if I wanted to travel from New York to San Diego 2425 Miles, why shouldn't I just get in a Helicopter/Hot Air Balloon and "Hover" for 2.4 Hours ?? :gotcha:

If your premise (rotflol hysterically, btw) that the atmosphere is also 'spinning' @ the same speed as the Earth: then, please elucidate the mechanism by which the atmosphere is attached to the Earth; I will Accept VELCRO!! :laugh_point:

In your explanation, please Identify the Exact Location where this Atmosphere --- traveling @ 465 meters/second, KISSES the Vacuum of Space !!! Show the Fire Works !!!!!


So if the Earth is 'spinning' @ 465 meters/second from West to East and I shoot a Cannon Ball straight up in the air here in Missoura and it takes 15 seconds to land ---- it should land 7,000 meters (4 Miles) to the West ??

:rotfl3:

Next, can you show Pigs Flying.....?


Can anyone post One Fairytale Picture of The Earth from 'Space' that's not a Composite (aka: Computer Generated Photoshop Fiasco?? And then, let's take a look @ the various "Pictures" for a Compare and Contrast!!!



Get ready to face Cognitive Dissonance in a BIG WAY!! I promise an utterly Awesome Realization... on the other side. thumbsup.gif

Many years ago, I thought I ferreted out the lions share of THE LIES... then @ the request of friends, I dropped it.

I didn't realize how far it went. More importantly, I didn't take GOD @ HIS WORD!!! That ends here and now.


regards


Some TERFs #transphobia #sexist #conspiracy reddit.com

Re: TIM makes women uncomfortable after they were nice enough to invite him in their home

(swoffsuperxsixone)

Lol, of course the thread is locked.

There are so man Trans moderators that take over subreddits to control the narrative.

You bet if it was a story about a brave handmaiden standing up for a poor transgender person being insulted and asking for advice on how to uninvite their "transphobic" friend they would let it soar to 2k comments and hit the front page.

It's just gross how these people spread their influence like a virus, they're not content with lesbiansgonewild having bizarre pictures of people who are very clearly men (who do not pass at al) showing their erect penises on the page. They have to take over other subs and make sure to lock any post where people are voicing an opinion that does not push the trans narrative. It's actually disgusting and manipulative. They will not win as this cannot go on forever, eventually threatening suicide and trying to take over spaces will not work, the rabid activists will end up a pathetic fringe group nobody takes seriously and everyone derides for their narcissism and unreasonableness.

(VatistaScrub)

The amount of work TRAs are putting in on spreading propaganda is insane. They have really put in a lot of work trying to worm their way into traditionally female groups, civil-rights groups, and certain spaces like technology. I don't even necessarily think companies and the media care that much about trans rights beyond those associated with the far left. I think mtfs especially just never shut up, they're on a crusade to shout down other peoples opinions and shame women into accepting them. There is no shortage of incels and horny dudes who will jump in to upvote their posts against the evil women

(wisetrash)

Oh my god. It's insane how they are choosing to say, "this has nothing to do with being trans"

🤣🤣🤣 What a joke.

(MacDurce)

Like, I’ve had guys over in my house and they would not do this cause they know we would call the police / pepper spray them but slap a wig on and call it a girl dick and suddenly it’s how do we let them down gently for exposing themselves to us while high on cocaine

(oceanmoondreams)

yeahhhhhhh hahahaha it has everything to do w it. using “she/her” pronouns and a “girly” name to lower their guard and after infiltrating their private space, assaulting and sexually harassing them. a cis girl wouldnt get away w that (or even go Nearly that far) and a cis guy wouldnt even be there in the first place.

god im so tired of the mental gymnastics and cognitive dissonance

(kasurimethi)

“It’s nothing to do with being trans, she’s just an asshole”

Yeah, because “she”’s a man and most men are assholes.

(throwaway275445)

Here are the top three posts I got on this sub just searching "sleepover".

https://www.reddit.com/r/itsafetish/comments/c8cgi1/why_do_they_do_this_why_do_they_love_the_idea_of/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

https://www.reddit.com/r/itsafetish/comments/cerc7p/tims_think_that_women_have_sleepovers_where_we/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

https://www.reddit.com/r/itsafetish/comments/bvqy08/no_alice_little_girls_slumber_parties_were_not/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

It's endemic and hardly any TiMs contradict the idea so it's clearly their majority view of the way women act. They can't deny it's part of the fetish, which itself stems from their delusional, objectifying and misogynistic ideas about women.

MedSledDriver #sexist airlinepilotforums.com

It’s not 1974 or even 2004 anymore. Being a “good human” is too ambiguous.

You sound like the kind of guy that would be struck with the wide-eyed stare of shock and maybe a little cognitive dissonance when you get called into the CP office over something like this.

Don’t let some thot ruin your career because she thought you weren’t being the “good human” you think you are.

Give them no opportunity.

You’re kind of right. I used to be on point with knowing how to behave around women. I used to enjoy the flirtatious banter at work among other places. But with the advent of IG, tinder, #metoo, etc, I just don’t care to “act” in any way just to appease some thot at work.

The fact that you think you have to put on an “act” points to the very problem this thread is addressing; the disproportionate power FAs have over you despite having far less invested in their careers with little to no consequence regarding the authenticity of their claims.

Same is true for female pilots. I’ll drop a trip if I see that I’ll be sharing the cockpit with a female. Nothing personal. Nothing against her abilities. There are certain career problems that I want to stay LIGHTYEARS away from. DUI and false accusations come immediately to mind. I’ve worked way to hard to get blindsided by any of that.

Give them no opportunity.

Jerome Horwitz #fundie christiannews.net

The Freedom From Religion Foundation exists for one reason, and one reason alone: To remove any and all things Christian from the public eye. In other words, they are a hate group.

They can say any frickin' thing they desire, but it's their actions that say something different.

Anne Gaylor has publicly attacked the Bible. They went after a family for having a cross as a memorial for a loved one. Last week it was revealed an FFRF member named Preston Smith intends to have a Satanic marker placed in a Florida park for the purpose of mocking Christianity.

And they say nothing about Islam and sharia creep.

Now, I know, I know, perhaps you and others will scream and shout how untrue that is, how Islam is not being taught or accommodated in public schools and universities, using cognitive dissonance simply because you believe the same things as they.

It's worth mentioning that a month ago this website reported China had passed even tighter regulations on religion. I lamented no one on the sociopolitical left that posts comments here would condemn this. Surprisingly, one, MCrow, did.

But only one.

Which says everything we need to know about the godless left. And why bullies like the FFRF need to be fought.

Anna Wilson #fundie aeon.co

In his essay ‘Uncritical Reading’ (2004), the Yale English professor Michael Warner writes about the way that universities break students of disreputable reading habits. When students first enter the classroom, he writes:

They identify with characters. They fall in love with authors… they shop around among taste-publics, venturing into social worlds of fanhood and geekdom… Their attention wanders; they skim; they skip around. They mark pages with pink and yellow highlighters. They get caught up in suspense. They laugh; they cry. They get aroused (and stay quiet about it in class). They lose themselves in books, distracting themselves from everything else, especially homework like the reading I assign.

The kind of reading that Warner describes his students bringing in from outside the classroom – excessive, feelings-y, full-body reading – is often associated with reading for pleasure, gobbling up genre fiction such as horror and romance on a lunch break or in the bath; getting the shivers, getting aroused, weeping, the glow from a happy ending. These aren’t pleasures of the classroom. They aren’t for serious literature.

As the literary critic Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick put it in her essay ‘Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading’ (2002), students are taught instead to master what Paul Ricoeur termed ‘the hermeneutics of suspicion’. ‘Hermeneutics’ (from the Ancient Greek for ‘translating’) denotes a method or system of interpretation, a way of finding out something. Students are taught to take an objective, almost hostile attitude to a text, to pick it to pieces and investigate it like a crime. They must not love it too much.

The hermeneutics of suspicion is built on centuries of philosophical and pedagogical ideologies that separate body and mind, then rank the mind above the body. As feminist critics have pointed out, these are sexist ideologies, because they associate the mind, in all its rational dimensions, with men, and the body with women, effeminacy and femininity. Indeed, universities were largely closed to women until the 20th century, in part because male academics claimed that women were incapable of distancing their emotions from their thinking. Generations of women had to prove themselves in the academy by being more rational, more clinical, more careful about how they showed emotion to male colleagues; only in the 1970s did feminist critics in Paris such as Luce Irigaray and Hélène Cixous – whose work influenced Sedgwick and Warner – begin to question the assumption that bodies and feelings had no place in literary criticism.

Growing up, I loved books. I loved them so much that I went to graduate school to study them, and I didn’t read a novel for five years. One of the terrible secrets about attending graduate school in literature is that it can ruin your ability to read for pleasure; pick up a book, and a nasty voice whispers that you should be reading something serious – or reading something seriously. So in the classroom, I learned to put away my body. Outside of the academy, however, specifically through fanfiction, I was learning to read with it.

I discovered fanfiction in 2001, when I was 16, unhappy at school, and frequently mistaken for a boy in women’s bathrooms. I’d joined a number of web mailing listservs, desperate to make friends, and I remember vividly the first time one of the fanfiction writers I followed posted a story she’d written about a character from The Lord of the Rings. I was staggered. It was like nothing I’d ever read before. Suddenly, I had a word for a genre that I had known intimately for years.

I’d always fantasised about stepping into books and having adventures with my favourite characters. Now I wrote them down and shared them. Strangers left positive comments on each chapter. I discovered that I could write. Later, I learned that there was a name for this kind of story: ‘Mary Sue’. The name comes from the short satire ‘A Trekkie’s Tale’ (1973), written by the mathematician Paula Smith and first published in a Star Trek fanzine to parody the flood of (in her opinion) terrible fanfiction stories in which all-American teenagers with names such as Mary Sue stride into the world of the Starship: Enterprise and win Captain Kirk’s fickle heart. Smith’s parody is embarrassingly similar to my first story, and thousands like it online, written by young women experimenting with fanfiction. But as I read more widely, I discovered a rich vein of sophisticated and brilliantly written fanfiction, offering insights into characters I knew and loved.

While bingeing on Harry Potter fanfiction, I was taking courses at high school, then university, in classical and medieval literature. I learned Latin, and read Virgil, Cicero and St Augustine in the original language. I wrote cold, sober, critical essays, but stayed up late into the night with fanfiction, my guilty pleasure, seemingly as far removed from the study of literature as it was possible to be. I moved to Canada to go to graduate school. By then I knew that fantasising about meeting Geoffrey Chaucer, or imagining what Queen Eleanor of Aquitaine might do if she met Sir Lancelot, was not the way serious readers did it. But I struggled with cognitive dissonance, since it was obvious to me that fanfiction had made me good at reading.

Pastor Mark Downey #racist kinsmanredeemer.com

How many Christians are aware of the appalling estimate of 100,000 children missing each year? Thousands are murdered with the blood drained from their little bodies. The jewish people are entirely capable and complicit in committing this dastardly deed. The immense weight of historical evidence conclusively points to the repetitive psyche of murder in the jewish soul for Jesus Christ and everything Christian. How many of the innocent youngsters you see on milk cartons have fallen prey to the ceremonial knives of rabbis and lie buried in secret graves or were ground up into dog food in some jewish-owned processing plant? This all may sound unthinkable and outlandishly far-fetched to the cognitive dissonant mind that has been conditioned to eagerly accept the mythos of 6 million gas-bag jews turning into ash, after 60 years of Pavlovian movies, books and TV. It would be quite another story if these medias were not owned and/or controlled by jews. You would be hearing about the greatest murder plot against humanity in the history of the world.

Jackanapes #fundie philosophy.group.stumbleupon.com

Learn about law and how Jesus fulfilled the law then think critically about how we are all equal under Law. You are free to reject God but then the State you live in is the law and your god.

I have plenty of basis in fact it's just that as the bible says: A scoffer seeks wisdom in vain, but knowledge is easy for a man of understanding.

Proverbs 14:6

I understand your need for cognitive dissonance against that which you do not believe. The fact that we are all considered equal comes from the Authority of God and that is where the equality concept came into being for the United States of America. Yet! If there is no god/s then there is no higher authority that will hold us all equal and accountable. If you hold to the law of this land then to recognize equality of being is to also recognize that there must be an Authority to hold all accountable. So even if you don't believe in God then the law of the United States is your god.

Holyheavens #sexist reddit.com

(Emphasis original)

We need a strict Patriarchy in order to put every single woman on a leash. They can not be allowed to have any sort of freedom outside of a man's influence because they can't handle it as we see in Western society.

Every modern western woman nowadays is no better than criminal scum.

When you don't coursely discipline and keep women under control, they go loose like wild beasts and spread their ass cheeks for every second Chad they encounter who then goes on to pump his load in their every hole. Governed by pure lust, as if they have no mind of their own they keep trying to satisfy these basic carnal desires through instant gratification.

There isn't a single shred of long term thinking in their primitive minds so when the time comes where they feel their biological clock is ticking, panic breaks out.

The sly filthy amoral foid then starts to look for a gullible weak man whom she can easily wrap around her finger. At that point, the disgusting used up cumrag who has devolved into a barbarian has lost all capacity for pair bonding. Don't even dream she's a type of person whom you can grow old with. No, she's long past that. Her primary incentive is to gain social points so she doesn't feel left out and also extracting resources from the stupid man.

While the poor husband is head over heels and mistakenly believes he's found a partner with whom he can build a relationship based on mutual understanding and Love, his wife is not sexually attracted to him in the slightest. Every 2 months when the man's been a good boy, he gets his dead starfish sex while she fantasises about her past sexploits with taller, more masculine and above all better looking men. They degraded her, treated her as nothing more than a meathole and she loved every second of it.

Children are conceived. A couple years later she files a divorce because "they grew apart" which really just means the foid has become bored of the bluepilled wimp, telling herself "I can do better than this". Loyalty is a totally foreign concept to woman. For a man with principles, being able to keep his word is akin to his lifeforce. Being scrupulous, consistent and reasonable is what makes a man feel actually human. Women lack all will towards this higher from of being and will strictly adopt whatever that won't ostracize them from society or their social environment. Another thing to note, women are not capable of experiencing cognitive dissonance because they only pay attention to how something feels for them in the present moment and that feeling justifies whether something is right or wrong. Whether it's immoral, deceptive or downright evil plays no part. Usually this is done through thorough applying self-deception and doublethink.

When she's gotten bored of the wimp, the woman turns into an incredibly demanding histrionic dramawhore. She's trying to rationalize everything into being the man's fault upon an impending divorce from her part.

The children then experience a breakdown of the family which brings with itself only detrimental consequences for their future in respect to their mental well-being, education and lifechoices. The profound effects of divorce is well documented in multiple academic studies with single-motherhood making things much much worse because single mothers are horrible and stupid parents.
__________________________________
Women are first of all innately morally deficient and alogical creatures who go loose like rabid bonobo's when not firmly curbed and put on their place by men.

They will degenerate everything that is intelligent and virtuous on their path of heedless destruction because they have no fucking idea what the fuck they're doing. They can not think matters through, they just can't. Woman's entire persona consists solely of the surface it reflects. You can not find anything beneath it, it's void. Her entire persona is an absorption from external influences she molds into what then consists as her core identity stemming from an extreme suggestibility. While women are mere empty individuals who can only act in accordance with the community, man is a higher form of life expressed as a differentiated individuality often referred to as the soul characterized by a strong will for greater truth and a deep connection with all that is. With the universe. It's for this reason that there has never been a single decent female philosopher nor will one ever emerge.

It also gives birth to originality and creativity which is characteristic to man. Woman can only reproduce it. Even among the poor and oppressed negro's of the USA, the blues, jazz, hip hop, rap all sprung out of young black men to draw an illustration. Let's not begin about science, classical music and ancient art. They speak for themselves. Women's achievements (always coming from the most masculine ones) bear no comparison.

Many men today are misled from what has been common knowledge since the dawn of humanity over all human societies ever surfaced. Emancipation of women isn't something enlightened or advanced from earlier patriarchal societies. It's pure stupidity and a product of capitalist policies in need for a larger wageslave force.

From a young age men are indoctrinated into a false idea of women. We are to believe women are capable of having agency, that they too are rational beings with whom we can have deep fulfilling conversations on worldly matters, that they are capable of unconditional love on the basis of who you are as a person instead of what you are, that they can breathe inspiration into your mind from insight on who you are, that women are all so different that there are certainly enough who fit these aforementioned criteria (not a single does). That a relationship where both parties stand on equal ground is possible. All these delusions are further exacerbated by media consumption with japanese animations in particular were the women are often a projection of the male producers their ideals.
__________________________________
A woman's natural inclination is submission and passivity.

She wants to be led, molded and derive her sense of identity of a man she considers to be in a dominant position. When a woman says she likes confidence, she means a man who's narcissism surpasses that of her for example. A woman can't respect a man who does not assert himself as the chief in a relationship. All of this comes easier when the male is taller because greater stature is directly imposing, hence their avid preference for this trait. This puts neatly in picture how primitive women actually are. These are her primal instincts she's incapable of sacrificing for the greater good of a society. If you let them go their own way, they will instinctively over the course of time aim primarily for apex men which will heavily skew the ratio of men and women with offspring. You see a similar instance with wild beasts such as gorilla's and even chimpanzees. In fact, this push can already be observed in "progressive" societies such as Norway where the gap between biological fathers and biological mothers has been steadily widening since female emancipation. Such a social order could never promote a civilised society as it would induce a perpetual competition between men barring them from cooperation.

A woman can not free herself from these impulses, only law and order pressed by men can guide an inherent amoral creature such as woman towards intelligent and virtuous behavior.

I thus propose extraordinary strict and harsh countermeasures for the revival of a full on Patriarchy. Beginning with a law that punishes any woman that engages in fornication through capital punishment. The capital punishment is preceded by stripping the prosecuted woman of her clothes on a public square where she is submitted to hundreds of flagellations. Once her body is covered in blood, salt is added for more pain. This form is public humiliation and inflicting of pain needs to act as a necessary deterrent for any woman who's daring to think of fornicating.

When this procedure has been completed, the woman is put out of her misery with public stoning. This helps with fostering a wider disgust and hatred towards criminals such as fornicators, so young children should be encouraged in participating to the stoning.

I'd like to emphasize once again that I'm advocating for lawful procedures enforced by the State.

We'd also need laws that would ban all women from education, holding public offices, choosing their own partners, participating in politics etc..

They should be banned from pretty much any institution where they can exercise their mindless opinions or choices that could bear an influence the societal structure. Be beautiful, take care of the family and shut up.

Curie #fundie lionoftheblogosphere.wordpress.com

The important distinction is that Seattle and Portland are obnoxiously PC because they don’t have many NAMs (or haven’t traditionally, though NAMs are migrating to the cities South of Seattle). There is an inverse correlation in obnoxiousness to one’s distance from a problem. Southerners are least obnoxiously PC because daily observable reality makes PC peter pan-ism too great an exercise in cognitive dissonance. In Seattle, with a black population of just over 7% and an Hispanic population just over 6%, your average Seattle SWPL need have no real contact with undesirable blacks and thus has fewer daily experiences that would disabuse them of their peter pan beliefs. Southerners, by comparison, have no real way to avoid coming into contact with undesirable blacks. It is also worth noting that northern blacks are, on average, more intelligent than southern blacks. Likely because the smarter of the group figured out how to leave Dixie back in the day.

Dr. Gary G. Kohls #conspiracy globalresearch.ca

Those of us who consider ourselves honorable 9/11 Truth-seekers understand how Galileo Galilei felt when his scientifically provable truth (that the earth revolved around the sun) was brutally suppressed by the ruling clerical elites of the 16th century.

Of course his run-in with church authorities was partly incited because he couldn’t refrain from pointing out that, because of his astronomical findings, he had proof that certain passages in the Bible couldn’t be true, thus claiming that the Bible was not inerrant. Cognitive dissonance erupted in the Vatican, and Galileo was declared a heretic and an enemy of the church. His books were banned, he was forbidden by the Inquisition to teach his “heresy” and he was placed under house arrest for the rest of his life. It took 4 centuries for the church to admit its error, thus inadvertently admitting that the Bible was not inerrant.

The enforced silence by the mass media concerning the Crime and Cover-up of the Century (the events of 9/11/01) should have been over long ago, that is, if there was any justice in this nation.

Is Courageous Investigative Journalism Dead?

If real investigative journalism was still alive and kicking in our corporatized, for profit media environment, and if exposing Big Lies was still regarded as important in our dying democracy, the black-listing of 9/11 truth-seekers and the court of law-worthy evidence that they have collected would have been celebrated and not denigrated.

Thea V Marena #fundie facebook.com

you can't be an animal lover and still pay for products of their suffering.

If you wear makeup or use body products that contain animal ingredients or were created in labs where millions of animals were tortured and killed, you're not an animal lover.

If you pay for someone to mutilate, modify, maim, confine, milk, scald, suffocate, de-feather, slaughter, skin and butcher animals so you can enjoy a simple taste, a leather handbag, a wool coat or a fur hat, you are not an animal lover.

You can't knowingly, willingly and financially support animal exploitation and abuse and still call yourself an animal lover.

[Another poster posts a meme mocking vegans]

When facts aren't on your side, resort to petty memes.

Next time I see an LGBT person getting beat on, or any non-white person having racial slurs hurled at them, I'll sit down, shut up and post memes instead.

If you refuse to stand up for those who can't defend themselves, you're a bystander, who does nothing to prevent the unjustices in the world. If an animal is (or billions of them are) being abused and exploited, I don't care about your cognitive dissonance or your snide comments, because their right to live without fear and abuse outweighs your shitty indifference any day.

I grew up eating eggs, meat and dairy. Then I grew the fuck up and stopped taking what isn't mine to take.

You should try it, because acting like a child isn't an excuse to still be a grown adult drinking a cow's breast milk.

Jedidiah Van Horn #sexist identitydixie.com

[From "Sexual Utopia in Power"]

It is well known to readers of this journal that white birthrates worldwide have suffered a catastrophic decline in recent decades. During this same period, ours has become assuredly the most sex-obsessed society in the history of the world. Two such massive, concurrent trends are hardly likely to be unrelated. Many well-meaning conservatives agree in deploring the present situation, but do not agree in describing that situation or how it arose. Correct diagnosis is the first precondition for effective strategy.

The well-worn phrase “sexual revolution” ought, I believe, to be taken with more than customary seriousness. Like the French Revolution, the paradigmatic political revolution of modern times, it was an attempt to realize a utopia, but a sexual rather than political utopia. And like the French Revolution, it has gone through three phases: first, a libertarian or anarchic phase in which the utopia was supposed to occur spontaneously once old ways had been swept aside; second, a reign of terror, in which one faction seized power and attempted to realize its schemes dictatorially; and third, a “reaction” in which human nature gradually reasserted itself. We shall follow this order in the present essay.

Two Utopias

Let us consider what a sexual utopia is, and let us begin with men, who are in every respect simpler.

Nature has played a trick on men: production of spermatozoa occurs at a rate several orders of magnitude greater than female ovulation (about 12 million per hour vs. 400 per lifetime). This is a natural, not a moral, fact. Among the lower animals also, the male is grossly oversupplied with something for which the female has only a limited demand. This means that the female has far greater control over mating. The universal law of nature is that males display and females choose. Male peacocks spread their tales, females choose. Male rams butt horns, females choose. Among humans, boys try to impress girls—and the girls choose. Nature dictates that in the mating dance, the male must wait to be chosen.

A man’s sexual utopia is, accordingly, a world in which no such limit to female demand for him exists. It is not necessary to resort to pornography for example. Consider only popular movies aimed at a male audience, such as the James Bond series. Women simply cannot resist James Bond. He does not have to propose marriage, or even request dates. He simply walks into the room and they swoon. The entertainment industry turns out endless images such as this. Why, the male viewer eventually may ask, cannot life actually be so? To some, it is tempting to put the blame on the institution of marriage.

Marriage, after all, seems to restrict sex rather drastically. Certain men figure that if sex were permitted both inside and outside of marriage there would have to be twice as much sex as formerly. They imagined there existed a large, untapped reservoir of female desire hitherto repressed by monogamy. To release it, they sought, during the early postwar period, to replace the seventh commandment with an endorsement of all sexual activity between “consenting adults.” Every man could have a harem. Sexual behavior in general, and not merely family life, was henceforward to be regarded as a private matter. Traditionalists who disagreed were said to want to “put a policeman in every bedroom.” This was the age of the Kinsey Reports and the first appearance of Playboy magazine. Idle male daydreams had become a social movement.

This characteristically male sexual utopianism of the early postwar years was a forerunner of the sexual revolution but not the revolution itself. Men are incapable of bringing about revolutionary changes in heterosexual relations without the cooperation—the famed “consent”—of women. But the original male would-be revolutionaries did not understand the nature of the female sex instinct. That is why things have not gone according to their plan.

What is the special character of feminine sexual desire that distinguishes it from that of men?

It is sometimes said that men are polygamous and women monogamous. Such a belief is often implicit in the writings of “conservative” male commentators: Women only want good husbands, but heartless men use and abandon them. Some evidence does appear, prima facie, to support such a view. One 1994 survey found that “while men projected they would ideally like 6 sex partners over the next year, and 8 over the next two years, women responded that their ideal would be to have only one partner over the next year. And over two years? The answer, for women, was still one.”[1] Is this not evidence that women are naturally monogamous?

No, it is not. Women know their own sexual urges are unruly, but traditionally have had enough sense to keep quiet about it. A husband’s belief that his wife is naturally monogamous makes for his own peace of mind. It is not to a wife’s advantage, either, that her husband understand her too well: Knowledge is power. In short, we have here a kind of Platonic “noble lie”—a belief which is salutary, although false.

It would be more accurate to say that the female sexual instinct is hypergamous. Men may have a tendency to seek sexual variety, but women have simple tastes in the manner of Oscar Wilde: They are always satisfied with the best. By definition, only one man can be the best. These different male and female “sexual orientations” are clearly seen among the lower primates, e.g., in a baboon pack. Females compete to mate at the top, males to get to the top.

Women, in fact, have a distinctive sexual utopia corresponding to their hypergamous instincts. In its purely utopian form, it has two parts: First, she mates with her incubus, the imaginary perfect man; and, second, he “commits,” or ceases mating with all other women. This is the formula of much pulp romance fiction. The fantasy is strictly utopian, partly because no perfect man exists, but partly also because even if he did, it is logically impossible for him to be the exclusive mate of all the women who desire him.

It is possible, however, to enable women to mate hypergamously, i.e., with the most sexually attractive (handsome or socially dominant) men. In the Ecclesiazusae of Aristophanes the women of Athens stage a coup d’état. They occupy the legislative assembly and barricade their husbands out. Then they proceed to enact a law by which the most attractive males of the city will be compelled to mate with each female in turn, beginning with the least attractive. That is the female sexual utopia in power. Aristophanes had a better understanding of the female mind than the average husband.

[...]

Fallout of the Revolution: “Date Rape”

A few years into the sexual revolution, shocking reports began to appear of vast numbers of young women—from one quarter to half—being victims of rape. Shock turned to bewilderment when the victims were brought forward to tell their stories. The “rapists,” it turns out, were never lying in wait for them in remote corners, were not armed, did not attack them. Instead, these “date rapes” occur in private places, usually college dormitory rooms, and involve no threats or violence. In fact, they little resemble what most of us think of as rape.

What was going on here?

Take a girl too young to understand what erotic desire is and subject her to several years of propaganda to the effect that she has a right to have things any way she wants them in this domain—with no corresponding duties to God, her parents, or anyone else. Do not give her any guidance as to what it might be good for her to want, how she might try to regulate her own conduct, or what qualities she ought to look for in a young man. Teach her furthermore that the notion of natural differences between the sexes is a laughable superstition that our enlightened age is gradually overcoming—with the implication that men’s sexual desires are no different from or more intense than her own. Meanwhile, as she matures physically, keep her protected in her parents’ house, sheltered from responsibility.

Then, at age seventeen or eighteen, take her suddenly away from her family and all the people she has ever known. She can stay up as late as she wants! She can decide for herself when and how much to study! She’s making new friends all the time, young women and men both. It’s no big deal having them over or going to their rooms; everybody is perfectly casual about it. What difference does it make if it’s a boy she met at a party? He seems like a nice fellow, like others she meets in class.

Now let us consider the young man she is alone with. He is neither a saint nor a criminal, but, like all normal young men of college years, he is intensely interested in sex. There are times he cannot study without getting distracted by the thought of some young woman’s body. He has had little real experience with girls, and most of that unhappy. He has been rejected a few times with little ceremony, and it was more humiliating than he cares to admit. He has the impression that for other young men things are not as difficult: “Everybody knows,” after all, that since the 1960s men get all the sex they like, right? He is bombarded with talk about sex on television, in the words to popular songs, in rumors about friends who supposedly “scored” with this or that girl. He begins to wonder if there isn’t something wrong with him.

Furthermore, he has received the same education about sex as the girl he is now with. He has learned that people have the right to do anything they want. The only exception is rape. But that is hardly even relevant to him; he is obviously incapable of doing something like that.

Cyralea #fundie reddit.com

Women want to be raped by a high value man

Not pussyfooting around this one. Title is literal.

If anything could ever be classified as a Feminist's Nightmare, it's the irreconcilable notion that women are extremely aroused at the thought of being able to make a high value man so lustful that he loses control and has to have her. Many women have struggled with this concept. Some have cleverly come up with positive terminology to deflect from the dissonance; they'll use terms like "ravishment" to doll it up, as if simply assigning a new word takes away from the reality of what's going on.

Here in TRP we do not shy from these realities. What goes through a woman's head when she contemplates being ravished is that she is of such high SMV that men lose their control just to have her. This is a level of validation few women get to truly experience. The male equivalent would be a pair of beautiful women demanding that you have a threesome with them.

I've no doubt this type of post causes SJW's to froth at the mouth, but their impotent rage doesn't invalidate reality. Consider the success of 50 Shades of Grey. The basic synopsis is that a powerful, rich, alpha man completely lusts and forcefully dominates a perfectly boring average woman. You'd think this banal concept would only sell to a fringe that gets off on this kink, but the book sold 70 million copies in 8 months. That's more than any Harry Potter novel. And now that the movie is out I guarantee it will be a box-office hit. Let women scream and "Wow, just wow" at you all they want -- their words mean nothing in relation to their actions. Women want to be taken by force by a high value man.

So when is it rape instead of ravishment? Aside from obvious cases of drugging someone or having sex with the unconscious (for the feminazi retards: No one here condones these instances of legitimate rape) the difference is strictly in the disparity of your SMV's. The stranger-in-the-bush is often characterized as some seedy low-life thug. This evokes intense fear. Being forcefully held down in bed by the muscular CEO of a Fortune 500 company does not evoke this fear. No woman alive is comfortable by the idea that she enjoys rape, so she needs to reframe it. Be aware of that.

So how does the average TRP'er benefit from this? If you're already sexually active with a woman, discuss the concept of a safeword. Even though women love the idea of being taken, there's always the chance that she may be in one of those emotional frames where she genuinely isn't up for sex, this is a failsafe. Once you've established that, next time you're looking to sexually escalate simply ignore her token attempts to refuse. She turns her lips away from a kiss, you force her against a wall and take it. She tries to push you off, you squeeze her. You grab her and throw her onto the bed, then lay into her with your weight so she can't get away. And so on.

Paradoxically this creates intense arousal and pair-bonding in women. I encourage you to try this. Of all the women I've had sex with only ~5% genuinely hated rough, aggressive sex. The other 95% beg for more afterwards. Surprising how many victims offer to make food and drink after their "trauma".

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Why they attacked Trump all along

Their agenda is to take the guns away from American people, in order to advance Agenda 21 (land grabs) and the NWO. They knew when Trump won the election that he was never going to take guns away from his OWN VOTERS, so this halted the Rothschild-dictated totalitarian sprint to a tiptoe. They are pissed. They needed that decrepit cuvt Hillary to win, because that knee-jerk reactionary disease would be banning guns by now.

So on with the feminist agenda - a work around to the "problem" they have by using women in positions of power at the local level to guilt trip men into giving up their guns and confiscating them outright.

They always want women in power because gynocentrism and a matriarchal society is their quickest route to the one world order.

What they want is women in power
What they want is women in power
What they want is women in power
What they want is women in power
What they want is women in power
What they want is women in power
What they want is women in power
What they want is women in power
What they want is women in power... to take the guns away

BlackLieutenant #fundie intjforum.com

Every relationships I got into turned very badly, and when the gal is seriously crying, I try to give a damn but I can't. Sometimes this coldness makes me laugh in my head (because it still surprises me), and the girl can see a little smile on my face while she's in tears, which makes things worse.

And I read this too : "Women married to INTP men had the highest level of dissatisfaction, at 31%." Which not surprise me, but when we're objective it's kinda shocking.

Seeing all this destroyed people around me just because of me is getting weird. Am I an asshole, or is it IxTPs people in general ? In both case I know I won't change so it kinda sucks in a way.

And how can women knowing MBTI can look after ISTP or INTP (men), there's nothing likable in us . This is a suicide.


[Just because women are biologically built to have children doesn't mean that we're built to stay home with those children.]

Women are weaker and therefore, less adequate for outside work. Even if most jobs today do not require physical strength, women are more emotional, more sensitive, more unstable (periods), less competitive and therefore less adequate for the workplace.

Men are physically stronger, women weaker. It's science. And denying that men have always searched for weaker, fragile, feminine etc... women, and women for stronger, muscular, tall, dominant men is bullshit.

[The fact that you think of women solely in the context of your sexual attraction to them is an example of sexism.]

I'm telling my way (and most men's) to behave with women is linked to our heterosexuality. Yes we prefer women be weaker than us, more fragile, nicer, sweeter etc... More feminine.


[I know a lot of men who believe they'd like to be stay at home dads and if that's what works for families then it's really not your concern. Babies are still being born, someone is staying home with them, doesn't matter if they have "milky boobs" or not]

First, most men would probably not want that. Second, you just screw with Nature. All women body functions, psychology etc... are made for motherhood. The existence of women is linked to motherhood actually. You wouldn't have your periods every freaking month otherwise.

[HOWEVER, "serial monogamy" (one mate AT A TIME) is absolutely something we're capable of. Essentially, the thing we should be asking for is not monogamy, but "exclusivity".

Exclusivity is the term and condition in a closed relationship social contract.]

Serial monogamy is BS and a social construction. It's the crap women tell us to make us believe "romantic monogamic love" exists (and is the norm). When I date somepne, my love for women don't go away and my dong too. Forbidding men to be themselves can make us go sneaky, hide stuffs and cheat.


Maybe. And because of this, women shouldn't impose "monogamous love" on men. Men and women don't have the same perspective on sex, one is active (and physical), the other passive (and almost emotional).
Sex has nothing to do with love/emotional bonding for most of us (men).

And because women want us to "love" them before we fuck, most of us (unfortunately) lie to get laid.

[Why not install chastity belts on women from the nursery homes until marriage (with a MAN only of course)?]

Women should be "correct" and "modest" about sex. I like women preserving for marriage, like Christians and Muslims. It's more correct and clean.

Men are not meant to be monogamous. Let the man live. We separate love/affection and sex quite easily. It doesnt mean we don't like you, just that other sexy/lovely women are very easy to love for us.

Personally,a beautiful woman sincerly smiling and being kind with me is enough for me to "fall in love". Even a silent/mysterious sexy woman is enough.

I already date women for a nice pair of ass, tits, beautiful eyes or hair, it's about little things sometimes.

Love is very physical for men. Love is more emotional for women. "Physical love" is more easy to have because you don't need a lot of bonding to have it. Men can look "promiscuous" because of that.

A lot of men think like me I guess.

For my sexual life, I don't think I could stay with one woman all my life, it's crazy. It's almost depressing. I would probably cheat on her or watch porn for a change. That's why men prefer submissive women, they won't leave you if you make "some" accidents sometimes. After pregnancies, women generally get fat, stretch marks and all, this is just disgusting. I don't know where the monogamy myth come from, at least for men.

Lonesh #sexist incels.co

[Hypocrisy] Foids want equal rights, but don't take equal responsibility

I often think what is the 1 thing what pisses me off about females, it has to be hypocrisy. That being the "equal" bollocks they sprout on about every fucking day. Either a news story in the paper, on TV or online you will hear something regarding it in some form or another.

Recently the abortion bullshit has cropped up again which has reminded me about the selfish intent of these bitches. So let me get this straight.... What they're saying it, they want to bang who they want and choose who to have kids with and whilst doing that happily kill a child in the process..... and they get away with this, not surprised really. Safe sex is too difficult for foids minds to comprehend, adult responsibility is something too extreme and wrong for a foid to even think about, "teehee, don't worry, just going to have a casual gangbang with 10+ men and get creamed in, then going to have an abortion" like no. YOU chose to do that, now you're pregnant, so fucking deal with it you selfish CUNT.

Just 1 thing out of many which makes my blood fucking boil. You are KILLING A CHILD. Apparently no foid in the world sees it as this.

Another main thing is the violence against women, this is simple to explain. Foids argue these men are controlling, first off it's very rare people are controlling without a single reason to explain it, unless they're mentally ill/insane, which is rare. There is a REASON for EVERYTHING. This reason is because this man has been hurt by either the foid hes "abusing" or other foids in the past. If somehow his current gf/wife isn't the problem, then she needs to blame it on other foids in the man's life for his hatred against her. These things don't happen for no reason woman....Or, you could use your "equality" bullshit and just leave...but apparently that's too difficult for you, is it cuz your woman? Yes....yes I think it is.

Lastly we all know about the equal pay/work rights bullshit, now obviously there's proof men get paid more than women in a variety of "similar" jobs, but they're a reason for this again. Foids are constantly checking their phones at work all fucking day, even talking with colleagues instead of working, whilst men do their fucking job. Not to mention when foids complain why foids aren't "being given" opportunities in politics or being a CEO of a company/business. Yet again there's a reason for this, you're not given the job just because you're a fucking woman you stupid dumb bitch, people are given the job based on their skills, work ethic and intelligence, not based on whether they have a pair of fucking tits and for "PC" bullshit.

Now fuck off with your equality bullshit, you stupid fucking whores. Go find another criminal on tinder and get raped and strangled by him, it's what you deserve you stupid cunts.

Anatoly Karlin #fundie akarlin.com

Russian women achieved the vote in 1917. Criticize them as you will – and I do – the Bolsheviks early on inserted equity feminism into the foundations of Russian society. This was a generation or two ahead of similar developments in the West. And it was a good thing. Today Russian women get paid more relative to men than in America or Britain, probably because spending a fortune on a Womyn’s Studies degree and then ranting about the “global patriarchy” at Jezebel or The Guardian when they find out no-one wants to hire (or marry) them isn’t a commonly accepted lifestyle choice.

When American women started demanding more rights many of them embraced gender feminism as the solution. Unlike equity feminism, which corresponds to classical liberal notions of legal equality, gender feminists want to feminize men and institute matriarchy. Matriarchy is of course an oxymoron and in practice means rule by alpha males, coupled with wanton repression of beta males (achieved in the West via alimony law, “rape culture”, harassment lawsuits, etc). Alpha males don’t take shit from feminists and as women they admire them; respectable betas follow the rules, as is their wont, and get shafted for their troubles, because no woman can truly respect a man who submits to her whims.

What you have then is complete social dysfunction, as a result of what is a deeply reactionary and anti-human ideology. It is ironic that (real) Marxism shielded Russia and the rest of Eastern Europe from the much more ruinous scourge that is cultural Marxism.

FunktionMann & Advocate #racist stormfront.org

(FunktionMann)

What's interesting about this whole thing is the way blacks are so fooled by it. They are the first in line to be displaced by these wandering parasitic idiots, but they welcome them in. Why? Because they know the border violators hate the gringos as much as blacks hate the crackers. So they mistakenly assume they are some sort of odd kinsmen.

They couldn't be more wrong. The only chance blacks HAD was with white people. And they spit in our faces while beating up our grandparents. I don't like to see wall to wall waves of Latinos coming in. But I have to admit I don't mind watching them shove blacks out while taking their jobs.

Sure, I'm cheering the lesser of two evils. Maybe I just want to see the look on all those black faces when reality finally hits. When they come to whites once again for help. Only, they will have to run it by the Hispanic bureaucrats who took all the black government jobs, so we may never see that day at all.

We're always going to have stupid peasants. Blacks have always been at the bottom. The only reason they are above that now is because white people put them there. They didn't "earn" it. They b|tched till it was gifted to them. Hispanics don't have an ounce of white guilt no matter how left they are. FM

(Advocate)

A great post. You're spot on in so many ways. Blacks and browns hate and murder each other, but they're unified in their hatred of WHITE people, notwithstanding that WHITE people created civilization in which blacks and browns have a better quality of life than in any society they could create. That's why Mexicans come here....to achieve a better life in a WHITE socieity they could not create in their own lands.

Both races are our mortal enemies. There's no way around it and we can't be lulled into thinking that any "alliance" with either race is possible. Their physical and cognitive levels are not compatible with ours.

Pizzachu1 #fundie reddit.com

It's obvious that most people are repressed pedophiles. Try showing them a naked 9-year-old girl to someone and see if they actually respond like she's non-sexual. It makes people so uncomfortable exactly because they find it arousing, but they're too repressed to admit it. Compare it to how they treat naked 0-year-olds.

Maybe most people aren't pedophiles, but most people are definitely attracted to people younger than they admit. People married and had relations with "children" for thousands of years, people didn't just suddenly stop liking kids 100 years ago.

Akif Pirinçci #fundie der-kleine-akif.de

In the past, yes, in the past everything was better! Especially our relationship to idiocy and the dumb. Back then we could go around dumb people, mock them, imitate their damn stupid mimic and gestures and all that dumb shit, that streamed out of their mouth, quickly disassembled, after which they, as dumb as they were, had nothing else to oppose it except by dumb gasping and welled eyes that were as big as a tennis ball, as if they were about to say "Hä?!" - amazing! Yes, those were still great times, in which everyone had its place in the cognitive hierarchy.

Sadly it's different nowadays, because the dumb now are considered to be handicapped, and you can't make fun of them. OK, they are, but no other disability provokes and angers the clear mind as the moans of such a hammered man.

Original German:

Früher, ja, früher war wirklich alles besser! Insbesondere unser Verhältnis zu Dummheit und zu den Dummen. Was haben wir damals über dumme Menschen herzogen, sie ausgelacht, ihre saudume Mimik und Gestik nachgeäfft und den dummen Scheiß, der ihrem dummen Maul entströmte, ratzfatz auseinandergenommen, worauf sie, so dumm wie sie waren, dem nix anderes entgegenzusetzen hatten, als dümmliche Schnappatmung und tennisballgroß hervorgequollene Augen, als wollten sie sagen „Hä?!“ – herrlich! Ja, das waren noch schöne Zeiten, in denen jeder sein Platz in der kognitiven Hierchie zugewiesen bekam.

Leider ist es heutzutage anders, weil die Dummen als behindert gelten, und über die darf man sich nicht lustig machen. Nun ja, das sind sie auch, doch anderseits provoziert und erzürnt keine andere Behinderung den klaren Verstand als das Geseire von so einem Behämmerten.

Richard S. Tolley #conspiracy beyond-science.com

THE ZETALIMIT EXPERIMENT

CAN WE BUILD THE MOST COMPLEX NETWORK IN THE WORLD
CAN I PROVE THAT X = "THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING" THAT EVERYTHING IS POSSIBLE!
AND NO MATHEMATICS OR PERSON OR COMPUTER COULD PROVE THIS WRONG EVER!

In this computer simulation or real event, to reach the end of technology in the year times of each time line
the I.Q and alpha and beta waves along with cognitive ability are increase along with other aspects. Now when all is done
taking the technology from time line 0 years to 9 years to find out how long it would take to reach
the end of technology then making the adjustments in the 9 - 0 years. One would say that taking the technology
from 9 years to 0 years would make more since and would be faster but more is learned about I.Q and problem solving
this way. THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a
nano chip OR QUNATIUM COMPUTER BACK to Adam and eve it would take them
3000 years to figure it out. Matrix Computing to Infinite Universes
Infinite out comes. Infinite intelligence beings

harridansofokcupid #sexist harridansofokcupid.tumblr.com


Harridans of OK Cupid
POSTS ASK ME ANYTHING SUBMIT A POST ARCHIVE
As I’ve said many times – all of the fiction that women are “strong” or as “capable as men” when it comes to strength, is pure non-sense. The thing I enjoy the most is showing women that simple fact. Take the sweet-young-thing, get the conversation turned to women in combat or some other non-sense, and make a bet with them. Show them reality and enjoy – as just as women seem to share a rape-fantasy, it’s all about being “over-powered” by a man. Nothing gets a woman wet faster than the reality of being overpowered and knowing that she’s actually “safe”… She’ll make up for being over-powered by riding you like a bucking-bronco…
I don’t make the rules – but I do enjoy them…

Jim #sexist blog.jim.com

Evolutionary psychology predicts that a man will love a woman he regularly has sex with, who lives with him and that he lives with and will be inclined to look after her welfare, which is not necessarily the same thing as doing what she wants. He will do what he thinks is good for her, and make her do what he thinks is good for her, even if she wants something different. Because one flesh. Taking care of her is taking care of her capacity to bear him children and raise his children.

It does not predict that she will love him all that much, since Gnon wants resources transferred from men to women, and from parents to children, but it does predict that she will obey him, respect him, and physically desire him, in order that he can take care of her and the children they have together.

That is how it supposed to work.

If, however, she is someone else’s wife, or is staying with her family rather the joining with him to form a new family, thus someone else is going to be looking after his kids by her, maybe the state is going to be taking care of her and he is just passing through, then evolutionary psychology predicts romantic love, that he will flatter her and do whatever she wants, no matter how foolish, unreasonable, and self destructive, as Lancelot treated Guinevere.

So, evolutionary psychology predicts that males will primarily experience romantic love in the case of adultery, and to a lesser extent in casual fornication. It predicts that they they will experience the love that a husband bears his wife after they have been living together and having sex for a while. And that women will tend to be at best good wives, rather than in love with their husbands. The wife who craves the seed of a man more alpha than her husband says

“I do not love my husband any more, therefore it is OK for me to service this rock musician and his biker roadies”

but women never love men all that much. They are not supposed to. They are supposed to respect, honor, obey, and desire their husbands.

Thus, the second mention of sexual love in the bible: Rebekah meets Isaac, explains herself. “And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother’s death.” The first mention of sexual love in the bible on the other hand has love and romance preceding sex and marriage instead of following sex and marriage – and things go badly wrong.

Romantic love was celebrated by the troubadours, and as depicted by the troubadours, was always adulterous love. King Arthur’s wife Guinevere desired Lancelot, and had sex with him, and Lancelot romantically loved Guinevere, King Arthur’s wife. In consequence Lancelot does lots of stupid humiliating self sacrificing things that prove his enormous burning love, Guinevere acts like an arrogant depraved obnoxious spoiled slut bitch, the fellowship of the Round Table breaks up, Camelot is defeated, and everyone gets killed.

This makes sense for maximizing reproductive fitness. Crazy destructive passion in order to cuckold other men, calm, gentle, firm, nurturing affection for one’s own family. Romance is what the troubadours depicted with alarming accuracy.

Romance is defect/defect equilibrium. Lancelot believes he is sacrificing himself for Guineverein in a Christlike fashion, and the troubadours believed he was sacrificing himself for Guinevere in a Christlike fashion, but in fact he is maximizing his Darwinian genetic self interest at the expense of everyone else. Guinevere also behaves badly to both Lancelot and to her husband King Arthur because she is maximizing her genetic self interest at the expense of everyone else.

Guinevere and King Arthur are in a defect/cooperate relationship. King Arthur is cooperating with Guinevere, by looking after her, and cooperating with Lancelot, in that Lancelot gets benefits as a knight of the fellowship of the Round table, while Lancelot and Guinevere are defecting on King Arthur.

King Arthur, of course, finds out, and Camelot gets defect/defect. Everyone is much worse off, and Camelot falls. That is Romance.

Sexual love is a bad thing except inside the confines of marriage. Men are supposed to have sex first and love later, and women are not really supposed to love men all that much at all. Nowhere in the bible are we told of women loving their husbands, and Guinevere treats both Lancelot and King Arthur very badly. We are, however, fairly frequently told in the bible of women seeking the love of their husbands.

If a woman thinks she is love, she is lying to get some alpha cock. Perhaps lying to herself because all the books she reads and all the movies and television shows she watches tell her that romantic love justifies and purifies every kind of horrible bad behavior. In reality, women are never in love all that much, rather they experience desire for love and sex, which they confuse with love when they proceed to do bad things in pursuit of this desire. Rather than loving a man, a woman desires to be loved by a man. If a man is in romantically in love with a woman whom he is not living with and having regular sex with in his own bed, he is crazy or evil.

What is the Red Pill?

It is the practical and applied knowledge of the Dark Enlightenment, the bad news about how the world really is, and especially and particularly the bad news about the nature of women. The Dark Enlightenment is science and the Red Pill is engineering. There is a certain cynical ruthlessness about the Red Pill. You are told how to use it against other people, and how to protect yourself from other people. Much seemingly virtuous and altruistic behavior, like the behavior of Lancelot towards Guinevere, is revealed to be foolish or, more commonly, wicked and dangerous. Even virtue is reduced to pragmatic self interest – virtue is trying to get into and maintain cooperate/cooperate relationships – as distinct from pretending to virtue in order to get into defect/cooperate relationships. Also, virtue is developing one’s own excellence, as for example lifting iron, or perfecting social skills.

What is the Blue Pill?

It is the official truth about the way the world supposedly works, and particularly and especially the official truth about the nature of women. If women were really the way that the blue pill says they are, then the behaving towards women the way that progressives say you are supposed to behave would work. Unfortunately, the way you are supposed to behave fails, and fails horribly badly with utterly disastrous consequences.

What is the Purple Pill?

It is an attempt to reconcile Red Pill truths with Blue pill morals: “Not All Women are Like That”. It is an attempt to avoid the most grossly self destructive behavior commanded by the Blue Pill, while still accepting that Blue Pill behavior is wise and virtuous behavior, rather than foolish, destructive, self destructive, and evil behavior. It is an attempt to reconcile with reality while remaining virtuous as Blue Pillers see virtue. But Blue Pill “virtues” are like Lancelot’s love for Guinevere: They are evil in themselves, and manifestations of evil. It was wrong for Lancelot to love Guinevere, as much wrong as it was wrong for Guinevere to have sex with Lancelot. Not only is it unwise to be the equal of your wife, it is also wicked. It is your job to supervise and discipline your wife, and some women, not all of them, not most of them, but quite a lot of them, sometimes need to be physical disciplined. You are wicked if you are not prepared to physically discipline your wife and your children in the unfortunate case that the necessity should occur.

What is the Black Pill?

The Black Pill is despair at the sad and cynical truths of the Red Pill, and the belief that we are doomed, that we as individuals shall not know a good sexual and family relationship, that we shall have few or no great grandchildren, that our race shall perish, that our homelands will be flooded by hostile angry sullen low IQ aliens who live on crime, welfare, and voting for the left, who get violent at microaggressions, that our civilization will die, overrun like Detroit and Salisbury by savages incapable of operating civilization.

What is the White Pill?

Deus Vult: That we will be victorious. That those of us that are lucky and strong will create proper families, that we will have love and grandchildren, that we will save our civilization and conquer the enemies of our civilization. That the able will rule over their inferiors, and men will rule over women, as is right for us to do.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

It’s hardly a secret, even among the SWPL hypocrati, that IQ is important to individual life outcomes, (and, on a grander scale, to a nation’s civilizational supremacy), that it correlates to a host of happy behavioral traits, and that dysgenic mating trends threaten to “decivilize” the West if nothing is done to reverse them. Given these accepted premises, many well-meaning but marginally spergalicious bloggers argue for the glories of assortative mating, (though in point of fact many assortatively sorted couples are meeting based less on shared IQ or unspoken eugenic hopes than on simple segregated convenience). This post may then come as a surprise, advocating as it does for a marital boycott of overeducated women.

IQ (and a woman’s educational level, insofar as the latter is an IQ proxy) is undoubtedly relevant if you’re interested in improving your future kids’ economic prospects, and likely getting more so thanks to increasing occupational cognitive demands, but it isn’t the alpha and omega of the good life. Myopic IQ fetishism notwithstanding, CH has spilled a fair amount of ASCII ink ridiculing equalists who despise the idea of an immutable general factor of intelligence and the consequent futility of public policy that fails to account for its reality. This is because the equalists are today those in power, and thus the most scrumptious targets for the Shiv Wielders.

Implicit or explicit support for assortative mating to boost a country’s “smart fraction” is arid frank & beans counting. Breeding Sorters say we are doomed if we don’t pair off high IQ partners in marriage to make high IQ babies. But there are more things in love and marriage, than are dreamt of in their social science laboratories. And there are more negatives to assortative mating than eugenicist whisperers are willing to admit.

There really is no point to marriage unless one wants children. Absent children, all the good things about marriage can be had in cohabiting relationships. This is even true of raising children if your blood is of Northern European stock, for whom the people of your motherlands demonstrate a facility at successful childrearing in non-marital cohabiting households. (Not to be confused with craptastic American-style single mom households, of which there are blessedly few in Scandinavian countries.)

So a major justification for marriage (and a reminder of the silliness of gay marriage) is that having children within a healthy functioning nuclear family environment benefits their development.

Right there is Problem Number One you’ll encounter if you marry an overeducated woman: She is likely to be far less fecund than less credentialed women. If you want at least the 2.1 kids necessary to replace you and your wife in the next generation, don’t marry a woman with a 4-year college degree and especially not a woman with a doctoral degree. You may as well line the spare bedroom with kitty litter.

Problem Number Two with overeducated women: Over the last 30 years, the happiness of women with graduate degrees has dropped faster than that of women with less than a high school education. (See Table 3, Panel E) The secular trend in happiness is down for women across all educational levels (which is not the case for men), but having more than a four year college degree accelerates the female unhappiness trends to rates above that for high school dropouts. Men are happier when their wives are happier, which means you should avoid marrying a credentialist status whore. And since there is scant evidence that children make you happier, it pays to find a woman who won’t exacerbate an already unhappy prognostication.

Keep in mind, too, that women get a lot unhappier with age than do men. So if you marry a spry 35-year-old post-doc she’s gonna be a real barrel of fun when she’s pushing 50.

Problem Number Three with overeducated women: Pairing them off with smart, accomplished men exacerbates social inequality. And not just because it amplifies white stratification by zip code; it also increases white stratification by IQ (and its attendant cultural fracturing). Society is best served when men with high IQs are free to inject their gifts into the wider world of women, instead of having all that gold-plated DNA locked up in the semi-barren wombs of Ivy Leaguers pushing social constructivism and infinity-wave feminist theory as a day job.

Problem Number Four with overeducated women: They’re sexually frigid. While sex surveys are more prone than any other type of survey to tempt respondents to lie, the results do offer a clue as to which way the tingles vibrate, and according to the data the tingles are practically buried dead underneath a mound of post-grad student loan debt.

For further confirmation of this nonsexular trend among superfluously credentialed women, see this screen capture of poll results on a message board for upper middle class married white women, most of whom probably have college degrees or better. The question asked is how many blowjobs do they give per month (presumably to their husbands). Since it is a private message board among women and not a publicly announced survey with social expectation bias built in, you can expect these responses to better reflect the reality of their marriages.

...

If you’re a man with a set of functioning gonads and not a sufferer of cerebral scalzi, you will want to avoid hitching yourself to an overeducated woman whose dusty muff and schoolmarmish mouth will open for business once every lunar cycle.

As CH is a cuntoisseur of the overeducated SWPL chick, some may wonder why the Lord of Lasciviousness would deign to game sexually frozen prey? Easily explained. First, a gentlemanly selectiveness honed by years of experience and psychological nimbleness has proved adequate at filtering out women likely to lay like dead fish in my roiling sea of sperm. Second, pre-marriage, pre-kids SWPL chicks are ravenous in a way they never will be within the confines of the marital home, copulating with an alacrity that belies their furtive fear that their future husbands will be unable to arouse in them the same fervor. Third, one must accept that many overeducated women are sexless termagants because they are married to beta males; they’ve lost that lovin’ feeling, and only a suave rico will summon it back.

But, if you don’t have the skill to reintroduce overeducated women to their bygone libidos, it makes sense to find yourself a less educated woman with a naturally higher sex drive and/or less benumbing experience in the desiccating company of anhedonic beta males.

Problem Number Five with overeducated women: They’re uglier. Now I know what you’re thinking. IQ and beauty, according to the evidence compiled, correlate to a nontrivial degree. All else equal, if you date only women with above-average IQs, you are probably dating women with above-average looks as well. But the formula, at least anecdotally, appears to break down once you move into the ranks of women with much higher than average IQs or years of accumulated education. Trawl any lofty Ivy campus and you can’t help but notice how poorly the super smart women compare aesthetically to their earthier competition. State U girls have it in spades over H Bomb girls. If you are a man, this matters for your marital happiness and stability.

emasculasian #racist sexstories608.tumblr.com

[Source NSFW. Also "vaginal suction" what the shit]

Biological reason why Asian women are exclusively mating with White men.

For centuries, East Asian cultures procreated with no emphasis on female sexual gratification. As a collective culture, assertiveness, individuality, and aggression are frowned upon. Testosterone levels are generally low among the males as a way to facilitate harmony and cooperation, and thus, their primary mating strategy revolved around avoiding mating competitions and mate-guarding.
As a result, the women were kept sexually repressed, powerless, and submissive through imposed social norms. Women had little rights and often went through their entire lives with only one sexual partner. Without the need to compete with other males, these men were able to reproduce with relatively tiny penises and testes compared to the men of other races. Sex generally lasted only a few minutes and rarely pleasurable for the women since only the male orgasm is required for conception. Men thus, worried little about their physical sex appeal and only focused on advancing their social standing and financial success to secure mates. Over time, their bodies and faces evolved to be bare and devoid of most of its masculinity.
This mating strategy that involved collective self-emasculation and suppressing female sexuality worked for a long period of time, up until the day Western men were introduced to their society. Forged in a culture that celebrates individuality and aggression, Caucasian men have retained most of their virile qualities while also advancing further as a civilization. While the Asian man was being taught to avoid confrontation at all costs, the Caucasian man had already been practicing the mating game with other sexually aggressive males since his early teens. Along with the privilege and status the comes with being White male, the White man already put the Asian man at a severe disadvantage. Not only is the East Asian woman already conditioned to seek after higher status males, the White man also has an assortment of mating tools in his arsenal that Asian men do not possess.

For generations, sexually repressed Asian women rarely got to experience sexual arousal or climax as it wasn’t required to procreate in an Asian society. To the Asian female, sex is just a chore and often a painful one due to there being no lubrication from her lack of arousal. Generations of feeling sexually apathetic towards her men leave her helpless in the face of unfamiliar erotic desire The White man’s high status already coincides with her social value of seeking after successful men, but it’s his testosterone filled physique and attitude that makes her forsake all social stigmas imposed by the feeble Asian male and mate with the White man.
For once, her genitals become supple and wet, ready for penetration. Her vagina, which has only ever accommodated small Asian members, is extremely tight and virginal to the foreign man. Though she experiences tremendous pain as her White lover enters her, his larger phallus is able to stretch her out and reach orifices Asian men typically can’t, stimulating an array of unexplored nerve endings. He, in turn, introduces a multitude of erotic sensations completely foreign to her, making her experience immense pleasure from sex for the very first time.
The White man’s more sexually experienced background empowers him to delay his climax. His muscular physique from maintaining his sex appeal enables him to continue thrusting vigorously without tire. As he is doing this, his cock is acting as a suction piston, emptying the contents her vagina of any previous insemination. The longer and more rapid he thrusts, the more her vagina is sucked clean. His larger cock also makes him more effective at removal, leaving not a spec of the Asian man’s sperm behind. Her sexual repression and inexperience leave her easily overwhelmed by all the erotic sensations his cock is giving her, and before long she will have already achieved orgasm; an experience the majority of East Asian men are unable to give her.

Since the experienced White man is only competing with sexually incompetent men, it was incredibly easy for the White man to bring his sexually repressed Asian partner to climax. He, in turn, still has a lot of endurance leftover. While she has already reached her sexual peak, he still isn’t done relentlessly thrusting his cock inside her, pushing her to a brink of continuous, multiple orgasms. Liquid starts gushing out of her, something she did not know is possible. Her body begins to convulse uncontrollably, her already tight snatch spasms on his cock, finally making the White stallion ejaculate. His large cock is then able to ejaculate his semen directly to the top of her vagina, making them first in line to enter the cervix. His large gonads allow him to generate and deploy a large enough load to both impregnate her and still leave a large sum behind to block rivaling sperm from entering. His ability to make his partner climax also means her cervix will dip uncontrollably into his seminal pool, proactively drawing his sperm inside her.
Once she has mated with the White man, she will no longer desire to mate with an Asian male. This is unfortunately due to the fact that there is no biological purpose for her to do so. The Asian man’s mating strategy has been rendered obsolete in the face of foreign competition; his genitals simply aren’t equipped for competing with other men, much less foreign men. His tiny phallus won’t be able to reach deep enough to scoop out the White man’s deeply-planted sperms. His sexual inexperience prohibits him from thrusting for very long before ejaculating, making him unable to generate enough suction to displace the White man’s seminal pool. His gonads, which is two-fold smaller, only produces half the number of spermatozoa as White men. His small penis won’t be able to deploy his sperm directly to the top of her vagina either, leaving his small army of swimmers to be blocked from entering the cervix by the large remnants of the Caucasian man’s load that he was unable to displace. Due to the absence of his partner’s orgasm, her cervix won’t dip into his seminal pool. Instead, her lack of arousal makes her vagina dry and inhospitable, giving his already smaller army of sperms even less of a chance to fight through to the cervix. This essentially renders the whole act of mating with the Asian male pointless. Even in the event where the Asian male mated first, her sexual frustration from his inadequate performance will lead her to seek out a Caucasian male, who will in turn empty the contents of her vagina of his inferior sperm.
Though procreation isn’t on the mind of any of these individuals, the White man’s superior mating abilities are what causes the Asian woman to start longing for sexually competent males. He, in turn, compromises the East Asian male’s primary mating strategy, which involves collectively emasculating themselves and keeping their women sexually repressed to avoid sexual competition with one another. This essentially completely backfires, handicapping themselves against the sexually competent White men who also tower over them in social standing. Even if they wanted to change, their bodies and faces have already evolved to be devoid of most of its masculinity, making them the least sexually desirable among women of all races including their own. Unable to escape their genetics, they will forever be resigned to the fate of watching over half of their women mate exclusively with White men.

anne frank #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Atheism is a fad cult whose followers worship Richard Dawkins instead of God. It is most notably the only religion that is self-deluded enough to claim to be backed up by science. Its followers are even more ignorant, dogmatic, and fanatical about their chosen spiritual path than they claim Muslims, Christians, Hindoos or Jews to be. They use science as their excuse for said dogmatism, and, unfortunately, some of them truly believe their own bullshit in this regard. Ironically, atheism is the most fundamentalist religion known to man. Atheists are hypocritical enough to think that killing 5 billion theists equates to world peace, or, more precisely that as long as people don't agree with them humans still possess the ability to hurt each other.

However, there is a key difference. People who convert to Islam or Christianity do so because they want to have a more fulfilling life, or because they had a genuine religious experience. People who become atheists do so because they got picked on in high school. Rummage through an atheist's emotional baggage and you will find a pile of leftover teenage angst, a few cases of repressed rage at mommy and daddy, and an overpowering urge to feel superior wrapped around a stupendous amount of self-loathing. Ultimately the "atheist movement" is just another Internet fad, mostly made up of attention whores, sycophants, stupid arrogant twats, bigots, assholes, and demagogues.

various incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: Reminder we’re on these cucks minds all day

image

(NormiesSuckAtRating)
Holy fuck. These people aren't normal and that's coming from someone like myself. Imagine being this obsessed with incels you talk about it with your partner.

RENT FREE.

(Incelebrity)
They wouldn't do it if we were merely a delusional group. They could be talking about pedophiles, other kind of criminals, terrorists, but no - us, because what we represent is the truth and they deep down know it but try to suppress it. It bothers them to the very core. They are tryign to bond with eachother by putting as down all the while reassuring they are not like us. I'm glad their tiny minds occupy over us, let them.

(ThotSlayer44)
r/inceltears is obsessed with attacking us because white liberals only care about things that affects them directly. That's why they attack us, because we threaten feminism and the gynocentric western matriarchy where women have sex with alphas in their youth before settling for a beta provider.

It's also why they got the fatpeoplehate sub banned (most white liberals are fat soyboys and "body positive" fat feminists) but they never say a peep about the white supremacist subreddits on this site of which there are several calling for literal ethnic cleansing.

(GazzaRowe)
White liberals are even more hated than incels. Minorities hate them, socialists hate them, the right hates them, everyone except themselves hates them. Most of those people don't know we exist. They have better things to do than browse forums for depressed virgins.

(WahmenMustDIe)
Another reminder: IT Landwhales can still get boyfriends without any trouble. Foids can never be Incels.

(fuckbitchesman)
Do they really think we care that a bunch of landwhales and soyboy cucks are laughing at us?

This ain't highschool you retards and you're definitely not the cool kids.

Hog Warsh #fundie answers.yahoo.com

People who become atheists do so because they got picked on in high school. Rummage through an atheist's emotional baggage and you will find a pile of leftover teenage angst, a few cases of repressed rage at mommy and daddy, and an overpowering urge to feel superior wrapped around a stupendous amount of self-loathing. Ultimately the "atheist movement" is just another Internet fad, mostly made up of attention whores, sycophants, stupid arrogant twats, bigots, as$holes, and demagogues.
Source(s):
Evidence

Mack Major #fundie facebook.com

Some of you ladies have been infected with "loser" energy. You picked it up from one of those guys you slept with not that long ago.

Now you have low energy. Your mind is constantly busy. You can barely sleep at night. You suffer from severe migraines and headaches. You don't accomplish much of anything anymore and you're not advancing in your life or in your field of work.

Your life seems to be at a virtual standstill.

Because you didn't know that whoever you allow inside of the sacred space of your vagina leaves a part of himself behind that ultimately becomes permanently attached to you. Didn't you know that a woman is a reflection of the type of man she sleeps with? You've become what sexually turned you on! And now you're stuck with the results.

Sex isn't merely physical: it's spiritual. What people mistakenly refer to as 'sexual energy' is really best described as the sharing of spiritual power between two individuals.

Just look at the design of your body to determine who does more of the receiving during this exchange. His body comes with an appendage that dispenses what's inside of him into your body. Your body comes equipped with a receptacle to receive whatever he's dispensing.

As a woman you end up becoming the sum total of every guy you've ever allowed within your sacred space.

And the more guys you've bedded in the past, the more mixed up and mingled that energy becomes inside of you. Kinda explains a lot of those weird thoughts, cravings and moods swings, doesn't it? You've taken on so much excess spiritual baggage that you're not even yourself anymore!

Now the question becomes: what do you do since you've allowed so many different guys (or maybe only one - I'm not judging) to leave a deposit of themselves inside of you?

How do you rid yourself of this spiritual baggage and get back to being your own self once again?

There is indeed a remedy! It's a powerfully effective one too. But if you want to know what it is you'll have to download the updated and revised edition of my ebook "Saved Sexy And Still Single: Why Christian Women Can't Get Married Even Though They Love God."

Hate to leave you hanging, but it's way too much information to leave on a social media post. Plus, I don't want folks stealing the info and misusing it! This is serious info for those who are truly ready to dump the junk in their lives and get right with God so they can live at their fullest potential.

I've revised this ebook with updated and new information. It'll be available July 1st for your reading pleasure: but you can pre-order it now and pay only half of its price tag (twenty dollars) when it officially drops.

Just ten bucks can change your life forever! But you have to get it now so you don't miss out.

And while you're waiting for this ebook to be released, start prepping your mind and body for the transformation you're about to undertake. Be mindful of what you eat and drink. Watch a little less TV. Take care of your vessel. Honor God and yourself by honoring your body temple. And be sure to reserve your copy of my new ebook tonight at: edendecoded.com/books/4s

God bless.

Pastor David L. Brown, Ph.D. #fundie logosresourcepages.org

Dracula devised a plan to rid society of the burden of all the country's beggars, sick, old, lame and poor. He invited them all to a feast. Little did they know that it would become a house of horror for them. He fed them well and got them drunk and then made his personal appearance and asked them, "Do you want to be without cares, lacking nothing in this world?" Naturally they all said yes! Dracula then ordered the palace boarded up and set on fire. No one escaped. Dracula was a madman. I do not want my child associated in any way with such a degenerate reprobate, do you?

Tragically, there are an increasing number of teens and young adults into the Gothic movement and its offshoot Vampirism. And I must tell you they really drink blood! I counseled a young man for quite some time that got involved in this. He had been a Bible College student, but was expelled after he was caught drinking his own blood. Another young man told me of how he and his girlfriend were into Vampirism. Part of their ritual included sex and then cutting his arm and drinking the blood. He said "the blood lust soon overpowered the desire for sex. It is a demonic craving and desire. It grows and feeds." He went on to say, "Id see people in certain situations and wonder what it would be like to taste their blood, the saltiness of their blood."

Chateau Heartiste #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon

I. Never say ‘I Love You’ first

Women want to feel like they have to overcome obstacles to win a man’s heart. They crave the challenge of capturing the interest of a man who has other women competing for his attention, and eventually prevailing over his grudging reluctance to award his committed exclusivity. The man who gives his emotional world away too easily robs women of the satisfaction of earning his love. Though you may be in love with her, don’t say it before she has said it. Show compassionate restraint for her need to struggle toward yin fulfillment. Inspire her to take the leap for you, and she’ll return the favor a thousandfold.

II. Make her jealous

Flirt with other women in front of her. Do not dissuade other women from flirting with you. Women will never admit this but jealousy excites them. The thought of you turning on another woman will arouse her sexually. No girl wants a man that no other woman wants. The partner who harnesses the gale storm of jealousy controls the direction of the relationship.

III. You shall make your mission, not your woman, your priority

Forget all those romantic cliches of the leading man proclaiming his undying love for the woman who completes him. Despite whatever protestations to the contrary, women do not want to be “The One” or the center of a man’s existence. They in fact want to subordinate themselves to a worthy man’s life purpose, to help him achieve that purpose with their feminine support, and to follow the path he lays out. You must respect a woman’s integrity and not lie to her that she is “your everything”. She is not your everything, and if she is, she will soon not be anymore.

IV. Don’t play by her rules

If you allow a woman to make the rules she will resent you with a seething contempt even a rapist cannot inspire. The strongest woman and the most strident feminist wants to be led by, and to submit to, a more powerful man. Polarity is the core of a healthy loving relationship. She does not want the prerogative to walk all over you with her capricious demands and mercurial moods. Her emotions are a hurricane, her soul a saboteur. Think of yourself as a bulwark against her tempest. When she grasps for a pillar to steady herself against the whipping winds or yearns for an authority figure to foil her worst instincts, it is you who has to be there… strong, solid, unshakeable and immovable.

V. Adhere to the golden ratio

Give your woman 2/3 of everything she gives you. For every three calls or texts, give her two back. Three declarations of love earn two in return. Three gifts; two nights out. Give her two displays of affection and stop until she has answered with three more. When she speaks, you reply with fewer words. When she emotes, you emote less. The idea behind the golden ratio is twofold — it establishes your greater value by making her chase you, and it demonstrates that you have the self-restraint to avoid getting swept up in her personal dramas. Refraining from reciprocating everything she does for you in equal measure instills in her the proper attitude of belief in your higher status. In her deepest loins it is what she truly wants.

VI. Keep her guessing

True to their inscrutable natures, women ask questions they don’t really want direct answers to. Woe be the man who plays it straight — his fate is the suffering of the beta. Evade, tease, obfuscate. She thrives when she has to imagine what you’re thinking about her, and withers when she knows exactly how you feel. A woman may want financial and family security, but she does not want passion security. In the same manner, when she has displeased you, punish swiftly, but when she has done you right, reward slowly. Reward her good behavior intermittently and unpredictably and she will never tire of working hard to please you.

VII. Always keep two in the kitty

Never allow yourself to be a “kept man”. A man with options is a man without need. It builds confidence and encourages boldness with women if there is another woman, a safety net, to catch you in case you slip and risk a breakup, divorce, or a lost prospect, leading to loneliness and a grinding dry spell. A woman knows once she has slept with a man she has abdicated a measure of her power; when she has fallen in love with him she has surrendered nearly all of it. But love is ephemeral and with time she may rediscover her power and threaten to leave you. It is her final trump card. Withdrawing all her love and all her body in an instant will rend your soul if you are faced with contemplating the empty abyss alone. Knowing there is another you can turn to for affection will fortify your will and satisfy your manhood.

VIII. Say you’re sorry only when absolutely necessary

Do not say you’re sorry for every wrong thing you do. It is a posture of submission that no man should reflexively adopt, no matter how alpha he is. Apologizing increases the demand for more apologies. She will come to expect your contrition, like a cat expects its meal at a set time each day. And then your value will lower in her eyes. Instead, if you have done something wrong, you should acknowledge your guilt in a glancing way without resorting to the actual words “I’m sorry.” Pull the Bill Clinton maneuver and say “Mistakes were made” or tell her you “feel bad” about what you did. You are granted two freebie “I’m sorry”s for the life of your relationship; use them wisely.

IX. Connect with her emotions

Set yourself apart from other men and connect with a woman’s emotional landscape. Her mind is an alien world that requires deft navigation to reach your rendevous. Frolic in the surf of emotions rather than the arid desert of logic. Be playful. Employ all your senses. Describe in lush detail scenarios to set her heart afire. Give your feelings freedom to roam. ROAM. Yes, that is a good word. You’re not on a linear path with her. You are ROAMING all over, taking her on an adventure. In this world, there is no need to finish thoughts or draw conclusions. There is only need to EXPERIENCE. You’re grabbing her hand and running with her down an infinite, labyrinthine alleyway with no end, laughing and letting your fingers glide on the cobblestone walls along the way.

X. Ignore her beauty

The man who trains his mind to subdue the reward centers of his brain when reflecting upon a beautiful female face will magically transform his interactions with women. His apprehension and self-consciousness will melt away, paving the path for more honest and self-possessed interactions with the objects of his desire. This is one reason why the greatest lotharios drown in more love than they can handle — through positive experiences with so many beautiful women they lose their awe of beauty and, in turn, their powerlessness under its spell. It will help you acquire the right frame of mind to stop using the words hot, cute, gorgeous, or beautiful to describe girls who turn you on. Instead, say to yourself “she’s interesting” or “she might be worth getting to know”. Never compliment a girl on her looks, especially not a girl you aren’t fucking. Turn off that part of your brain that wants to put them on pedestals. Further advanced training to reach this state of unawed Zen transcendence is to sleep with many MANY attractive women (try to avoid sleeping with a lot of ugly women if you don’t want to regress). Soon, a Jedi lover you will be.

XI. Be irrationally self-confident

No matter what your station in life, stride through the world without apology or excuse. It does not matter if objectively you are not the best man a woman can get; what matters is that you think and act like you are. Women have a dog’s instinct for uncovering weakness in men; don’t make it easy for them. Self-confidence, warranted or not, triggers submissive emotional responses in women. Irrational self-confidence will get you more pussy than rational defeatism.

XII. Maximize your strengths, minimize your weaknesses

In the betterment of ourselves as men we attract women into our orbit. To accomplish this gravitational pull as painlessly and efficiently as possible, you must identify your natural talents and shortcomings and parcel your efforts accordingly. If you are a gifted jokester, don’t waste time and energy trying to raise your status in philosophical debate. If you write well but dance poorly, don’t kill yourself trying to expand your manly influence on the dancefloor. Your goal should be to attract women effortlessly, so play to your strengths no matter what they are; there is a groupie for every male endeavor. Except World of Warcraft.

XIII. Err on the side of too much boldness, rather than too little

Touching a woman inappropriately on the first date will get you further with her than not touching her at all. Don’t let a woman’s faux indignation at your boldness sway you; they secretly love it when a man aggressively pursues what he wants and makes his sexual intentions known. You don’t have to be an asshole, but if you have no choice, being an inconsiderate asshole beats being a polite beta, every time.

XIV. Fuck her good

Fuck her like it’s your last fuck. And hers. Fuck her so good, so hard, so wantonly, so profligately that she is left a quivering, sparking mass of shaking flesh and sex fluids. Drain her of everything, then drain her some more. Kiss her all over, make love to her all night, and hold her close in the morning. Own her body, own her gratitude, own her love. If you don’t know how, learn to give her squirting orgasms.

XV. Maintain your state control

You are an oak tree. You will not be manipulated by crying, yelling, lying, head games, sexual withdrawal, jealousy ploys, pity plays, shit tests, hot/cold/hot/cold, disappearing acts, or guilt trips. She will rain and thunder all around you and you will shelter her until her storm passes. She will not drag you into her chaos or uproot you. When you have mastery over yourself, you will have mastery over her.

XVI. Never be afraid to lose her

You must not fear. Fear is the love-killer. Fear is the ego-triumph that brings abject loneliness. You will face your fear. You will permit it to pass over and through you. And when your ego-fear is gone you will turn and face your lover, and only your heart will remain. You will walk away from her when she has violated your integrity, and you will let her walk when her heart is closed to you. She who can destroy you, controls you. Don’t give her that power over yourself. Love yourself before you love her.

***

The closer you follow the letter of these commandments, the easier you will find and keep real, true unconditional love and happiness in your life.

Best,

Your Lord and King

Peter Koenig #quack #conspiracy lewrockwell.com

This is leading to a total control of every individuum on the planet. It is sold to the public as the Internet of Things (TIT), meaning self-driving cars, robotized kitchen equipment, artificial intelligence (AI) for the production and delivery of everything. What the sales pitch doesn’t say, is how humans would be marginalized and enslaved. To carry this masterplan forward, high frequency electromagnet waves are needed. Therefore, rolling out of 5G is a must, no matter what the health impact on humans, fauna and flora may be – and no matter how it may influence viral infections, like possibly the current COVID19.

WHO remains silent, although they do admit that no independent official study has been carried out on the dangers of 5G – and electromagnetic fields in general. Does that mean that WHO is coopted by the Big and Powerful into this deadly spiel? – Let it suffice to say that unlike other UN agencies, WHO was created in 1948 by the Rockefeller Foundation (RF) – see The Lancet. It might be also noteworthy that about half of WHOs budget comes from private interest sources, mostly the pharma industry, but also others, like telecom giants.

RadiantUpstairs #sexist reddit.com

Re: Two atomic blackpills dropped on unsuspecting normies

image

This "evolutionary pressure" explanation is just post-factum rationalization, but damn it works.

How is that? Women have to carry the child inside them for 9 months and most always are the one to raise it if things don’t work out. There is way more of a reason they would be concerned with good genetics than a dude.

It's giving a pseudorational veneer to their ethical degeneracy.

It's basically the same sort ofrationalization you'd give for any eugenics project.

The ethical must be paramount. Women are unethical eugenicists who deny the means of reproduction to males they deem life unworthy of life.

If we had a system where women who wouldn't put out were left to starve in the street, would that be found ethical? Of course not.

You must understand how deeply abused men are, to think women can do no wrong, even when men are being denied the necessaries of life.

”its a pseudorational veneer to their ethical degeneracy”

Ethical degeneracy? Its literally just foid nature.

“its a rationalization for a eugenics project”

You realize most species are naturally eugenic right? Us included.

“women are unethical eugenecists who deny men reproduction”

They can argue being forced to reproduce with men they dont want is unethical. You're making the case for monogamy and patriarchy completely incorrectly.

“you must understand how deeply abused men are”

I do but i also wont call the reasons for why its reality immoral or "ethical degeneracy". It is simply the way of human beings. Patriarchy abd monogamy was a good solution while remaining ethical because it paired looksmatches and gave both men and women the ability to move up in looksmatch bit by bit per generation.

Yes, OK, you can deny the ethical, that is fine.

Most species are not eugenic, most species do not have any ethics involved in reproduction. Eugenics is an ethical system. A male primate might be fought off by a stronger male primate, or by a group of female primates, but that is not eugenics, it's not like that male primate has been indoctrinated to believe he needs to wait for the woman's approval.

Eugenics is a psychological system backed by violence; primates do not develop systems of psychological control at the cultural level.

Eugenics is a cultural phenomenon, to reduce all mating behaviour, because sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, in every animal species, to eugenics, is to miss the essential nature of eugenics.

Eu, good, genos, kind. Eugenics is involved in intentional selection of "good traits." Even if nonhuman primates, and other animals, are involved in trait selection, they're not doing it because they think those traits "good," they have no scienter, knowledge of good and evil.

Sam Monnett #fundie facebook.com

[On female top nudity]

At face value, this seems silly; but in reality you must understand that the female breast--for better or worse--is a secondary sexual characteristic. The very sight of them sexually arouses most men. Women complain about men staring at their tits when they are wearing clothes; what do you think is going to happen when they start walking around topless? And, if the feminists that push for this ever got their way, they would quickly change their tune from "We want equality. We should be able to go topless too," to "Men make us walk around with our tits out. Patriarchy!"

Chewingofthecud #fundie reddit.com

Good question. Some thoughts on the Flynn effect:
1) It is environmental
The Flynn effect is caused by advances in environmental factors, particularly in prenatal care and nutrition. This is why the effect has slowed in recent years--these factors have been more or less maxed out. However in places where those factors have not been maxed out such as the developing world, the Flynn effect continues and in some places is even accelerating.
2) It masks a more general intellectual decline
There are many environmental factors in the modern world which have the opposite effect, and when the Flynn effect ends these factors will precipitate a crash. One of these is the modern welfare state--subsidizing the unskilled and incompetent artificially boosts birthrates among that population, which puts downward pressure on cognitive ability. Another factor is progressive culture which views childbearing as low-class and an example of women "giving up on their potential." This pushes down birthrates generally among women, and especially among intelligent women, which also puts downward pressure on cognitive ability. Finally the most profound IQ-shredding effect is from technology itself. The basic mechanism is that technology benefits those who lack natural abilities (not just cognitive) in greater proportion than it benefits those with naturally high cognitive abilities--e.g. the smartphone has increased the man on the street's range of intellectual possibilities far more than it has the scientist or the history professor's (analogously, think of how a gun benefits the physically weak more than it does the strong). This also puts a downward pressure on cognitive ability by (a) favouring the weak, and (b) facilitating dependency which causes natural abilities to atrophy with disuse.
It does not make a great deal of sense to retard those members of society who are most responsible for advancing the society's material needs. If the best solution to racial tension is basically to dumb down society, is this not a good indication of the failure of multiculturalism?

thegambler953 #sexist reddit.com

Women are sexually fluid

https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/1180409/this-is-the-fascinating-reason-women-have-evolved-to-become-bisexual/

Females do not have a sexual orientation. They just have sex with whoever turns them on wether he is a man, a woman, a shemale or whatever. They are not necessarily attracted to either men or women. They do not specifically crave a penis or a vagina. They just go with whatever gets them wet at the moment.

Ann Barnhardt #fundie barnhardt.biz

With regard to the Church and the Alpha-Beta structures and dynamics, I personally believe that people who are actually controlling and calling the shots BELIEVE IN THE FAITH… because they are Satanists. I believe that the key Alphas in the Vatican and the key outposts in the Church, the people who send out the orders and are literally at war with God are literal Satan worshippers.

The “Beta” caste is the group that I have defined as those who “Don’t Actually Believe Any of That Bullshit” – and by “bullshit”, I mean Catholicism. I believe the massive bureaucracy that is, right now, before our very eyes, destroying the Church from the inside out, is almost entirely comprised of men who don’t believe any of it to start with, who think that actual Catholicism is all “bullshit”. They are the Beta DUPES, PATSYS, and WISEGUYS, groveling before and taking their cues and orders from a caste of psychopaths that literally worship Satan, and thus believe in all of it: The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Real Presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist, the existence of Hell and eternal damnation, the supernatural reality of The Church, and, interestingly, the words of The Mother of God, particularly at Fatima. Oh yes. The Satanists believe EVERY BIT OF IT. Make no mistake.

And yes, I believe that Bergoglio is in the Beta caste, and doesn’t believe in any of it, and thinks it is all bullshit. I think that Bergoglio is a bootlicking Beta Diabolical Narcissist that was installed precisely because he would do ANYTHING the Alphas wanted, not only because he is a DN with delusions of grandeur that craves Narcissistic Supply, but also because he is a profoundly unintelligent man, and thus very easy to manipulate and control. (If you’re thinking of Obama as a direct analogue at this point, you’re right on.)

The Alphas aren’t gunning to drive people OUT of The Church – they are gunning to get as many people to engage in Eucharistic desecration as possible. They want people coming and receiving the Eucharist in mortal sin. What they are doing is aimed, first and foremost, at “hurting” and “humiliating” God. The loss of souls to hell is secondary, and derivative of their hated of God and spite. They want people to go to hell precisely because God loves them. It is the Satanic inversion of the Second Great Commandment: hatred of man for the hatred of God. They don’t want to shoot the Bride of Christ in the head – they want to RAPE the Bride of Christ forever – and make God watch.

If you think this uncharitable of me, consider the alternative – that Bergoglio is an actual Satanist. I doubt it. The only thing Bergoglio worships and adores is Francis.

Mainländer & ScornedStoic #sexist incels.co

(Mainländer)

[Blackpill] Blackpill machine gun yesterday at college

I have this 18 yo ~4/10 mulatto/parda classmate who I'm in a group with for one of the final assignments, so yesterday we spent some time together and she was telling me and the other people from our group about her recent sexual and romantic adventures.

She is going out 1-3 times per week apparently and last time she went out she met a professor from our very college (but from STEM) and she told us he kept paying everything for her that night. Not cheap stuff either, they ate at a sushi restaurant (those are kinda expensive here), he payed for her drinks that night, he payed for her breakfast, but don't get me wrong, he didn't even kiss her. He asked her for a kiss and she refused, he invited her to go to Europe with him and she refused, he declaimed his feelings for her, she made fun of it and laughed.

Then she started telling us about her Chad onitis. She was crazy about him, desperately waiting for a message from him and not wanting to send one first, that typical playing games stuff. She unashamedly talked about how they met, kissed, found a room and had casual sex. She even used the Brazilian expression "amor de pica bate e fica" which is basically "dick love comes to stay", referring to how she fell for him after they fucked.

He told her that he "was afraid she might develop relationship expectations", JFL. And she also kept lamenting that she was sure he was probably fucking and kissing tons of girls on the side. This guy is at least a Chadlite, you can be sure of it.

Also, she told us that she already kissed the effeminate pretty boy from our class, as well as tons of other guys from college and from elsewhere, just in that less than one year time frame.

So that's it folks, women live life on debug mode with betas buxxing everything for them even while getting nothing in return, they get to bang pretty much anyone they want, which doesn't even make them happy though because Chad won't commit, let alone to someone vastly below looksmatch level, 18 year olds are already humongous whores and JFL at gigacopers who think they can find adult virgin and pure girls (any girl who's a virgin after 18 nowadays either has serious psychological or physical problems or is waiting for gigaultrachad to marry her which needless to say excludes anyone here).

Also, it's worth mentioning that this girl has no tattoos or piercings and even had a Christian upbringing. She's not some top 5% sluttiness type or anything, she's your average 18 yo college chick in 2019, in Brazil that is, it must be even worse in more feminist/degenerated countries from North America and Europe.

Great story, but yeah, this is the main takeaway, howthis is just average.

It's absolutely impossible to picture the average 18 year old chick thinking that this is wrong to do or something, it's literally just a basic interesting life for them, this is what makes life at all interesting and worth living and fun. (remember that they don't have any real ambitions and homemaker ambitions have been taken away from them in the 21st century)

Basically you'd have to fight tooth and nail (like that professor) and face social dissaproval, just to get with some 18-19 year old girl that isn't completely burned out on casual sex and jaded.

It's kind of massively over.

Yes, they have no reason whatsoever not to live like that in 2019, they are following their fucked biological inclinations. Even though it won't make them happy anyway. Society pays a huge price allowing females to become whores despite all the damage and upheaval it causes and this doesn't even make them happy, JFL. Cucks are the lowest of the low. Also, speaking of cucks, I don't feel bad for that professor, not even in my bluest pilled days I even considered buxxing women without getting nothing in return like that. He's part of the problem too.

image

I saw another version of in which several countries surpassed Brazil. Also, 17? JFL. Try counting only women now.

The words "blackpill machine gun at college" make me want to rewatch polytechnique when I get home.

Also, it's enraging that it's socially acceptable for foids to string along men like that. It's just a waste of resources for a creature that does not appreciate it anyway because it came from a sub 5 man.

Society is 100% gynocentric. Everything is set to cater to women. Women can pursue all their biological goals (alpha fucks beta buxx, stringing along, intrigues instead of violence, false rape allegations, getting with older men when they themselves get older) but men, especially ugly men, cannot (fuck young girls, especially when older, physical violence instead of intrigues and false claims, keep wanting younger women even when older).

(ScornedStoic)

I nearly died reading this shit.

Tbh.
There was a girl in my last year of highschool that came over to my desk to talk to me after a presentation I gave about said topic, and it was really weird. She was acting kind of flirty, but it was obvious she wasn't into me. i.e. no touching, kept her distance, wasn't really looking at me, but she was driving the conversation. Of course bluepilled me was enthralled so I kept going on with it, but then all of a sudden out of nowhere when class ended she up and basically bolted.

Later in the day I asked a female friend I was orbiting (remember, still pretty bluepilled) if she knew what the fuck that was about, since all the girls at that school knew each other. She told me with a deadpan look on her face, no inflection, no sarcasm or anything, that the girl I was talking about had fucked the entire graduating class (not me, of course,) and that there was a guy in that class I was in that she was trying to make jealous. Literally had nothing to do with me, but that's not the point, the point is a 17 year old girl according to another girl who knew her told me, the social outcast, that she'd fucked at least 20~ guys. I've seen her social media, and paid attention to how she interacted with guys afterwards, and I fucking believe it. There was literally nothing to gain for that "friend" in telling me, either.

Jim #sexist blog.jim.com

The basics of Reaction need to be stated, and they need to be stated in a way that excludes our enemies, because we are seeing a whole lot of people saying “Hail fellow reactionary”, who are clearly hostile to us, and not hostile the media/academic/judicial elite that we seek to overthrow, blaming various groups that tend to be allied or sympathetic to reaction for the problems caused by our holier than thou elite, urging reactionaries that the real enemy is group X, where X is anyone who is plausibly an ally or likely to become one.

So, starting with the concepts most likely to offend: The reactionary red pill on women. Which are also concepts that have practical application even while our enemies rule. Next articles in the Reaction 101 series will be more directly political and have less individual application in daily life.

Emancipation was a bad idea. Feral women behave badly and are psychologically disturbed. They need to be redeemed by becoming the property of some man. Women are psychologically maladapted to independence and equality

In any marriage or long term relationship, the woman will endlessly launch physical, emotional, and legal power struggles against her husband or boyfriend, shit tests, which power struggles she wants to lose.

If she wins, she will break up, looking for someone who can conquer her. You just have to win. If the only way to win without going to jail is to send her away, send her away and go dark. But she would rather you beat her. You have to wear the pants. This is the PUA analysis of negs and shit tests, applied to long term relationships.

Women are maladapted to equality. That women find male apes sexually attractive and men do not find female apes sexually attractive indicates that among those humans that whites and east asians are descended from, females have not been allowed to make sexual choices since the days we looked rather like apes. Since female sexual choice is quite common, we should conclude that groups that allowed women sexual choice failed to reproduce or suffered dysgenesis, and perished.

In order to reproduce, and particularly in order to reproduce the white and east Asian ancestral environment, in a cold climate with severe winters that require food and shelter over winter, husbands and wives need cooperate/cooperate equilibrium, and if you have free women, you get defect/defect equilibrium. To impose cooperate/cooperate requires external coercion, in particular that women have to be stuck with the first guy that they have sex with, and are not permitted to be permanently on the prowl to trade up throughout their fertile years.

When allowed to be permanently on the prowl, they tend to practice serial monogamy until around thirty or so when their eggs start running out.

All businesses with women in power are destroyed, unless they are the beneficiaries of some state favor that artificially keeps them in business. Female executives are only useful if under the authority of a sexy alpha male, otherwise they turn on the shareholders, the employees, and the customers, perceiving them as betas.

Subjective personal observation: All sexual harassment complaints result from horny women shit testing terrified men, and then getting frustrated because the terrified men fail their shit tests. This personal observation is statistically confirmed by the fact that a far larger proportion of women complain about sexual harassment in workplaces where the women substantially outnumber the men. There has never been one complaint of sexual harassment against me, and if sexual harassment complaints resulted from social justice warriors tell us constitutes sexual harassment, there would have been a pile of them.

Subjective personal observation: All rape complaints are false and all rape convictions are false, not because real rapes do not happen, but because women do not really mind real rapes and fail to complain. This personal observation is confirmed by the University of Virginia complaints process: The university of Virginia dealt with a big pile of rape and sex complaints, and dismissed every single one without disciplinary action. So Rolling Stone investigated them looking for poster girls and trouble, came up empty.

Men and women very much want to form families and want those families to last into their old age. My wife was eighteen in my eyes all her years, except near to the very end, and even though I sometimes have some pleasant youthful female companionship, I still sometimes find myself shaking and weeping when I remember my wife.

If you look at any successful family, no one is equal. Dad is in charge, mum picks up the socks. In principle, it is possible to form families in a society where men and women are equal, by freely contracting out of equality, but in practice, it is hard, and I see how hard it is for my sons. We have prisoners dilemma with few iterations, so the natural equilibrium between men and women is defect/defect. To prevent defect/defect, to ensure cooperate/cooperate, requires heavy handed coercive intervention by state, family, and society, and this heavy handed coercion necessarily bears far more heavily on women than on men. If you want a society where men and women know sexual love, or if you want a society which has above replacement total fertility rate, women just cannot be allowed to follow their pussies. And this requires a lot of supervision and coercion, primarily keeping women under control, rather than keeping men under control. For most women this requires that they be subject to the potential threat of physical discipline by the men in their lives. For a great many women, this requires that they be subject to the actuality of physical discipline by the men in their lives. So women should never have been emancipated, and some “violence against women” is legitimate, proper, and proportionate. Women, like children and dogs, need discipline and supervision and are never happy if they do not get them. A spoiled child, or a spoiled woman, or a spoiled dog, is never happy. The dog and the woman bark all the time.

Further, sexual impulses set in in girls at a disturbingly early age, usually well before puberty thought there is a great deal of variance, while male sexual impulses set in at puberty, as reliable as clockwork.

Ever greater vigilance against pedophiles” is like telling a chicken farmer he should not fence or cage his chickens, but instead should make the world safe for his chickens to wander wherever they please. When nine year old girls go to an Ariana Grande concert without being accompanied and supervised by male kin, they are going there to get nailed. Restraints on female sexuality have to restrain females, have to be oppressive to women, because being oppressive to men is not likely to work, and is conspicuously and spectacularly failing to work.

The family law of the Old Testament got it right, and modernity is surrealistically deluded, and flat in my face insane. I see in front of my nose stuff that no one else sees, so either I am insane or the world is, and the statistics are strangely consistent with me being sane, and difficult to reconcile with the world being sane. If you are using words for human things and human conduct that the people of the Old Testament had no words for, chances are you are using words for things that have no real existence, anticoncepts, words that are lies, that you are speaking madness and delusion.

The family law and family institutions dictated in Deuteronomy and depicted in the Book of Proverbs lasted for thousands of years. Our current social order is extremely recent. Within living memory, within my memory, it has changed radically in ways that are horrifying, tragic, and terrifying, and everyone is acting like this is normal and nothing is wrong.

Modernity is for me like one of those horror movies where one character sees monsters and another character does not, and you wonder if the monsters are real or just delusion, until you see someone get eaten by a monster. And I see people getting eaten by monsters, in the sense of transparently false rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, sexual harassment et cetera charges, and I also see people who tell me men have nothing to fear, because women never lie, while women have much to fear because they so very very much dislike rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, and sexual harassment. But I also see these men acting terrified, while I am bolder than any of those men who supposedly believe that men have nothing to fear. In part of their minds they must see what I see, because I see their fear, and in part of their minds, the part that speaks and constructs a narrative, they do not see what I see, even though it is right in front of them.

Women get angry because they do not get the supervision, command, and guidance that they crave. Sometimes this anger turns inward, as with cutting and other self destructive acts, and sometimes it turns outward. She feels really badly treated, because she has in fact been really badly treated, but because the real causes of her discontent are unthinkable, she concludes she has been sexually harassed or sexually assaulted, when in fact her mistreatment was lack of sexual assault, lack of a strong hand to discipline her.

Anonymous Commenter #fundie onenewsnow.com

The “equal rights” slogan misses the point. No one is denying anyone the option to marry (the opposite sex). Instead, this movement asks for a new special legal form of marriage that never existed before, even though it lacks the complementarity and procreative qualities of natural marriage. Research has shown that same-sex relationships do not have the stability of heterosexual counterparts (granted there is room for improvement among heterosexuals here too). Unlike “Will & Grace,” 75% of same-sex couples do not stay together for more than 7 years, and monogamy is uncommon (which is also a contributing factor to the disproportionate rates of STDs, etc.). Children need and crave stable families. It’s not a matter of hate, but debate. I don’t want to see people hurt in the long-run.

Corey Savage #sexist returnofkings.com

10 Feminist Fantasies That Could Become A Reality In The Near Future

Corey is an iconoclast and the author of ‘Man’s Fight for Existence’. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature.

Around 2013 when I first discovered the manosphere, I knew things were bad in our society in terms of sex relations along with the corroding effects of feminism. But at the time, I didn’t appreciate just know how bad. In just few years since then, I’ve seen enough madness to know which direction we’re headed and it doesn’t look good. We already live in a feminist society and the harpies are pushing to make things even harder for ordinary men who just want to get on with their lives. The following will demonstrate what will happen to our society if we were to give into all the demented demands of today’s feminists.

Although this article is meant to highlight the craziness of it all, note that many of these concepts are already starting to take shape in our societies to become a reality.

1. Expansion Of Hate-Crime Laws
image
“You can’t save Mary Jane anymore, Spiderman. It’s ‘benevolent sexism’, and therefore, a misogynistic hate-crime.”

In England, trying to pick-up a woman or even just whistling at her is considered a “hate crime” if the woman gets upset by it. It is a real possibility that this law might spread to the rest of the West and expand to include other misogynist offenses including: looking at a woman (what feminists call “stare rape”), calling a trans-woman a he (there’s already a similar law in New York), arguing with women online, manspreading, mansplaining, helping a woman, and so on.

2. Consent Forms
image
Since women get to dictate the terms of all sexual interactions, consent forms will have to become a necessity in the future. And not just for sex, but in all forms of interaction like being able to approach a woman on the street. Maybe an app will be developed where a woman could consent to sex, conversation, or being looked at so that she could screen out all the low-life misogynists who want to compliment her for her looks.

3. Anonymous Rape Accusations + 100% Belief In Woman’s Testament
image
All men are rapists; we need to believe her because she’s a woman. It’s a perfect circular logic.

Feminists claim that the reason we live in a patriarchal rape culture is because our society discourages rape victims (always women) from coming forward and also because their words are not taken seriously. So, what they’re proposing is clear: rape accusations should be done anonymously and the “victims” should always be believed against evidences that are biased because… patriarchy.

Men have already lost their jobs, kicked out of school, jailed, and even murdered for false rape accusations while their accusers faced no legal consequences (and got to keep their anonymity). So, we’re not really that far from reaching that level.

4. Feminist Re-Education Camps
image
This book is not a mandatory reading in kindergartens yet. What more proof do you need that we are all oppressed by the patriarchy?

With feminism taking over the educational institutions and already working to reprogram men to serve the system, it won’t be long before men who have been found guilty of misogynist hate crimes to end up in re-education camps. We already have sensitivity training in jobs while colleges are adding courses on toxic masculinity to re-define what it is to be a man on feminist terms. It probably won’t be long before “toxic masculinity” is added to DSM as a mental disorder (in place of homosexuality) and treated like a disease in mental health institutions.

5. Government-Sponsored Feminist Tribunals
image
Canada already has an actual social justice tribunal.

Since it’ll be difficult to charge men of bogus hate crimes against women with nothing more than a woman’s feelings as a proof, the government may introduce tribunals similar to the kangaroo courts in universities and HR departments at workplaces, all in the name of creating a harmonious society free of hate. Those who enter these tribunals will also be destroyed by the media and have no chance of being employed and be subject to permanent social ostracism even if they’re found not guilty.

6. Systemic Castration
image
As I’ve mentioned in my other article, docile and compliant dogs are the ideal that feminists aim for in their efforts to domesticate men. A significant number of boys are already on ADHD medication to have their behaviors controlled while male sex offenders are given chemical castration. If all men are violent hooligans and rapists as some feminists claim, then the next logical step is to let the government control men’s testosterone levels to an “acceptable” level. Note that we already have many parents who are letting their children take hormones to alter their “gender.” This practice will likely become more common in the future.

7. Non-contact Sex
image
“She did not consent; I must not touch.”

Feminists have been so effective in terrorizing the beta males that many of them are afraid to interact with women in any shape or form. Consider that we already live in a world where walking past some deranged woman will get you accused of sexual assault. In the future, all physical contact with women may become sternly discouraged or even forbidden that more men will retreat to porn and sexbots as alternatives. Haptic technology for sex is already being developed to pave the way for a culture of non-contact sex.
8. Bachelor Tax
image
Did you think you pesky “MRA’s” could escape the gynocentric order by refusing marriage and going your own way? With the drop in number of men who are manning up that coincides with the rising number of single mothers who need to leech the welfare state, it’s not too unreasonable to expect a push for bachelor tax that will penalize men who refuse to put a ring on an aging, post-slut sow.

Knowing that it will cause a major backlash, the bachelor tax will probably not come into being in an obvious way. Instead, it will be introduced under the guise of supporting the poor single mothers and helping to foster families. Heck, considering how men are the primary tax payers while women are the primary beneficiaries of the welfare state, you could say that we already have a gynocentric taxation system in all but name.

9. Polyandry
image
Women already practice ‘Alpha fucks, Beta bucks’ strategy. So why shouldn’t an empowered woman be allowed to do it openly without shame?

With the institution of marriage already destroyed and with many men already accepting cuckoldery as the norm in the form of “open marriage,” women may as well be allowed to have multiple husbands. And why not? We already know that there are far too many men for the number of women in our society and that those lazy men should do more to support women. Is it that crazy to have one husband for sex and another three for money? I’m sure many desperate simps will have no issue sharing a wife with several other men as long as they get some cuddling action when she’s not too busy banging her more attractive husbands. The implementation of bachelor tax, mentioned above, will also make marriage more desirable.

10. Concentration Camps For Men
image
The final solution to the testosterone problem.

If the above measures to protect women and ensure equality are implemented, it’s likely that all the misogynists will grumble in anger and resist them. If that is the case, it might be best to take the advice of the feminist, Julie Bindel, and place all men in concentration camps. No man, no problem! If you’re wondering how feminists could even achieve this, know that there is already an army of goons called the police who will gladly do as they’re told to maintain the gynocentric order.

Conclusion

As I’ve said in an older article of mine, feminism is practically a terrorist movement that demands more and more political, social, and cultural oppression of men for the sake of radical women who play the eternal victim and cry for never-ending privileges. While you may think that the above nightmare scenarios are over-the-top and unlikely to happen, I bet those who lived just few generations ago couldn’t have imagined what we’re witnessing today either. Feminism, by colluding with the government, will continue to grow like a tumor and it will not stop until you make it stop.

Remember that if we don’t fight back, no one else will.

Rookh Kshatriya #sexist kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com

The Ineffable Mystery of Anglo Hypergamy

Because of the puritanical fictions that prevail in Anglo-American society, Anglo women have become impossible to please by rational means. As with Christian morality (a behavioural system intimately associated with Anglo feminism), the bar has been set impossibly high. The outcome is either misandrist spinsterhood or, more often, what we see around us: a female obsession with the dregs of the male sex. Oddly, this bizarre paradox makes sense. If no male is good enough for the Anglobitch, then rational scales of differentiation no longer apply.

This is the problem with Game and its ‘Greek’ system of male classification. The specific nature of Anglo-American hypergamy derives from a puritanical archetype, removing it from all rational rules of hierarchical classification. Since no male is good enough for her, all men are flattened into an undifferentiated, priapic horde in the Anglo female’s mind. A king is a jack is a joker… a classical scholar at Yale is suddenly no better than a murderous baboon like Charles Manson. An illiterate tramp with a ring through his nose instantly acquires the same standing as an architect, physicist or surgeon.

And this explains why exponents of Game report no special mating success in the Anglo-American world. All their 'Alpha' striving is meaningless in a misandrist culture where male status has been downgraded to untermensch levels. While men believe in such classification systems, they have no meaning to Anglo women whatsoever. Similarly, if all women were facially mutilated at birth and forced to wear sackcloth and ashes, we would have no way to differentiate them: and with no woman higher than a four, no female hierarchy of sexual appeal could exist. Or course, most feminists would rather like that, too.

And this is what makes Game – so appealing to the logical male mind – so ineffective in the Anglosphere. Misandrist women cannot distinguish between Nobel Prize winners and tattooed psychopaths – all are men and thus worthless brutes in their entitled eyes. And so all the Gamers’ striving for 'Alpha' status is pointless – they might as well stick rings through their noses, grow some dreadlocks and slouch the streets scratching their butts. Indeed, as many North American commentators claim, their mating chances would probably improve if they did this. ‘Omega males’ doubtless confirm the Anglo female’s contempt for men in general. If she has to have a man, only the worst knave will do.

Gamers are wrong about Anglo women. Socons are, too. Writers like Daniel Amneus consider female hypergamy to be the ‘glue’ that binds male consent to the social order. That might make sense in less repressive cultural settings. In the Anglosphere, however, rational female hypergamy has short-circuited due to our cultural bloc’s uniquely puritanical socio-moral conditions. While alphas and high betas trudge home to empty beds or divorce threats, tramps and mass-murderers wade through tons of female flesh without breaking sweat. And so the Anglosphere falls apart around our ears. Yet still David Futrelle exhorts us all to ‘respect women’ and be ‘nice’.

Go figure.

Gavin McInnes #fundie thoughtcatalog.com

Wait—you’re transphobic?

You have a problem with a guy having his penis removed? He’s a chick, you asshole. God fucked up and made him a dude, but luckily we have the technology to fix that mistake. Why couldn’t he just be a drag queen? Well, for one, he needs to feel a penis inside him. No, his butt doesn’t count. He needs to feel a penis go in and out of his vagina—you know, like all women crave. That feeling of having your vagina fucked. It’s a primal urge, and to deny some woman this feeling just because she’s a dude is downright barbaric.

Haven’t you seen all the totally functional, happily married, normal trannies walking around? They aren’t all dead, you know. They sell flowers at the local village and bake pies for their scores of adopted children. They’re non-heteronormative. In fact, the only thing more normal than castrating yourself and taking tons of hormones to grow tits is chopping them off. Women who get double mastectomies and then have their cunts turned inside out are just righting a wrong. They need to have a weird cheese blintz-looking thing sticking out of their previous cooch because it feels way better than wearing a strap-on. Sure, the nerve endings aren’t the same as a real dick, but standing up to go pee pee is something these women were born to do. How dare you have a problem with that?

You will be totally comfortable when your daughter marries a post-op dude and you should have no problems with her smoking his blintz. When your dad tells you he is going to have his penis removed and thrown into a biowaste container at the hospital, your soul will become a placid lake of calm. “That’s totally normal, dad” you’ll say and begin to call him Mom2 from that day forward.

When Janet Mock appears on MSNBC and talks about growing up as a black chick, nobody’s going to bat an eye. We’ll all be totally comfortable with him retroactively rewriting history and putting a skirt on all his boyhood memories.

I kid. I kid. Of course it’s fucking unusual. We’re all transphobic. We aren’t blind. We see there are no old trannies. They die of drug overdoses and suicide way before they’re 40 and nobody notices because nobody knows them. They are mentally ill gays who need help, and that help doesn’t include being maimed by physicians. These aren’t women trapped in a man’s body. They are nuts trapped in a crazy person’s body. I see them on the streets of New York. They are guys with tits and a sweatshirt. They wear jeans and New Balance. “What’s the matter with simply being a fag who wears makeup?” I think when I see them. You’re not a woman. You’re a tomboy at best. Get fucked in the ass. And ladies, if you’re a butch lesbian, you’re a lady with a lot of testosterone. Put a dick on a belt and fuck your girlfriend. You don’t need to turn your vagina inside out. You’re not a man. You don’t even know what Turf Builder is.

By pretending this is all perfectly sane, you are enabling these poor bastards to mutilate themselves. This insane war on pronouns is about telling people what to do. It may empower you to shut down a school’s computer system because they phrased your gender wrong, but that’s just a game to you. To them, it’s a life-changing event that fucks them up. To fight against transphobia is to justify trannies. To justify trannies is to allow mentally ill people to mutilate themselves. When your actions are getting people mutilated, you’re at war with them.

It’s not great for women, either. Buying woman parts from a hospital and calling yourself a broad trivializes what it is to be a woman. Womanhood is not on a shelf next to wigs and makeup. Similarly, being a dude is quite involved. Ripping your vaginal canal out of your fly doesn’t mean you are going to start inventing shit and knowing how cement works. Being a man is awesome. So is being a woman. We should revere these creations, not revel in their bastardization. Being gay is a weird quirk that happens at birth. It’s like being an albino. If you’re born that way, you shouldn’t fight it. You don’t need to change who you are. In fact, doing so is sexist, misandrist, homophobic, and further damages the lives of the mentally ill.