Similar posts

ComtdeMistre #fundie freerepublic.com

I just read this article on the struggles that many conservative Christian pastors are undergoing, with internet pornography: http://www.christianpost.com/news/pornography-and-pastors-103931/

I believe that easy availability of free porn on the internet has lessened the taboos that Americans traditionally had, when taking about perverted sex acts. People who have viewed internet porn, feel hypocritical when they condemn gay marriage.

Porn is a form of prostitution, and prostitution is illegal in 49 out of the 50 states. Why does local law enforcement prosecute pimps, hookers and johns, for street prostitution, but leave out the millions of incidents of prostitution taking place in all 50 states in the form of internet porn.

In the early days of internet porn, internet users had to confirm they were adults, before they could get access to internet porn. There are no such restrictions today.

I view internet porn as a deliberate globalist plot to destroy America. In 2012, the white population in America declined for the first time in history, something that did not even take place during big wars and the great depression. The number of white Americans who died outnumbered the white Americans who were born by 12,400. I suspect internet porn played a major role in that tragedy. http://www.medicaldaily.com/population-white-americans-declining-first-time-ever-what-will-race-look-americas-future-246815

Angelica Zambrano #fundie christiscoming777.com

SATANIC TRAPS FOR CHILDREN

As we left that place and He told me, “I want to show you something else… There are also children in this place.” And I replied, “Children in this place, Lord? Why are there children here? Your Word says, ‘let the children to come unto Me, and do not stop them: for the Kingdom of God belongs to such as these.” (Matthew 19:14)Jesus replied, “Daughter, it’s true, of such is the kingdom of Heaven, but that child must come to Me, for he who comes to Me I will not throw out.”(John 6:37) Instantly, the Lord showed me an eight year old boy being tormented in fire. The boy cried, “Lord have mercy of me, take me out of this place, I don’t want to be here!” He kept crying and screaming. I saw demons around this boy, that resembled cartoon figures. There was Dragon Balls Z, Ben 10, Pokémon, Doral, etc. “Lord, why is this boy here?” Jesus showed me a large screen of this boy’s life. I saw how he would spend all of his time in front of the TV, watching these cartoons.

Jesus said, “Daughter, these animated cartoons, those movies, those soap operas that are seen daily on TV are satan’s instruments to destroy humanity…Look, Daughter how this came to be.” I saw how the boy was rebellious and disobedient toward his parents. When his parents talked to him, he would run away, throwing things and disobeying them. After this happened, a car ran over him and ended his life. Jesus told me, “Ever since then, he has been in this place.”

I looked at the boy as he was being tormented. Jesus said, “Daughter, go and tell parents to instruct their child as is written in My Word. (Proverbs 22:6)” The Word of God is real, it tells us to correct a child with the rod, but not every moment, only when the child has been disobedient to his parents. (Proverbs 22:15)

The Lord told me something that is very sad and very painful. He said, “Daughter, there are many children in this place because of animated cartoons, because of rebellion.” I asked Him, “Lord, why are animated cartoons to blame for this?” And He explained, “Because they are demons that carry rebellion, disobedience, bitterness and hatred to children; and other demons enter these children, so that they do not do good things, but do that which is bad: whatever children see on TV, they want to do in reality.” Hell exists, hell is real, and even children must decide with whom they will go. I said, “Lord, tell me, why are there children in this place?” And Jesus answered, “Once children have knowledge that there is a heaven and a hell, then they have a place to choose.”

Porcupine #fundie animenewsnetwork.com

People who like child porn don't need 'therapy'. It's perfectly fine to like child porn, even real child porn. It's only not okay to produce it (because it's rape) and it's not okay to support the child porn industry (by buying the product). In this case, we are dealing with animated porn in which children MAY be involved (I still have not seen any actual titles named so even this is unproven). There is nothing illegal about producing animated porn or animated child porn, and there SHOULD be nothing illegal about watching animated child porn either. In most countries it is certainly legal. In Australia, it MAY be illegal but even that is not proven as the articles that reported this incident have not given us enough information to prove that it was not just a case where the Australian justice system made a mistake.

If you think people who like child porn need 'therapy', then gays need 'therapy' too. Maybe people who think the Earth is round need 'therapy'. So let's throw them in the corner and kill them by throwing stones at them, or tie them up and burn them up at the stake as heretics, like in the olden days.

Some Hawaiians think that super fat women are beautiful. That's nasty. They are heretics I say. We should throw all the Hawaiians into a corner and stone them to death.

Maybe people who DON'T like child porn need 'therapy'. The people who do like child porn should throw all the stupid normal people into the corner and stone them to death. The only reason this wouldn't work though is that more people don't like child porn than those who do, so if there is a stone-throwing war then the child porn people lose.

There's no right or wrong. It's simply groups of people with different attributes. Some people think the world is flat and some people think the world is round. What happens when people have disagreements? I dunno, I guess that's what the government is for, but governments don't always do a perfect job either (think Saddam Hussein or Hitler).

I think it'd be interesting if a small country openly declared pedophilia, and even real-life child porn and child sex, completely legal in that country. I don't see this as an impossibility at all (considering things that countries have done in the past). I bet if such a country were to exist, people would find that there are more pedophiles in the world than gays.

albouski #sexist returnofkings.com

Last year, I decided to stay over at an old friend’s apartment, who had been my roommate back in college. A couple of weeks of residing there, every time I moved in and out of his room, my old buddy would be watching anime on his laptop. His door had a poster of his favorite anime, ‘Sword Art Online’.

He wasn’t an otaku or a dumb weeb, rather to simply put it, it was his pass time or a hobby, to relax from the stress that men face in the modern day world. I remember watching anime as a kid, and I admit, I enjoyed it…

But not anymore.

When he watched anime, he stared at the screen with fascination, as if he was a scientist waiting for the rocket to land on the moon. I was curious, so I asked him to recommend me some anime that he enjoyed. This is where I realized the ugly, misandric nature of anime that teens are exposed to.

The first anime I chose from the list, was about a teenage girl named Misaki, who joined an all boys school which recently opened to girls. She works as a maid to support her family as her father had abandoned them.

...

The “Does Not Like Men” Female Protagonist

Misaki never trusts her male counterparts, and beats them up if they tried something she didn’t approve of. The whole show is centered on how girls can be better than boys, where she terrorizes men, and how these men are portrayed as nothing but pervs, violent, thirsty mindless jerks.

Usui, the male character, after being yelled at for no reason, is strangely drawn to her, and so are the other boys of the school. This hyper misandric woman deemed ‘attractive’ in the eyes of both anime characters and the male fans. This show is targeted towards girls who call it “one of the most romantic anime”.

I was extremely disgusted and had to quit watching within 10 episodes. I couldn’t have a place in my mind to understand how men watch shows like this and enjoy it.

...

This is a common formula used by anime and manga creators to depict a strong independent woman who doesn’t need a man. Female superiority is rising within anime, and young may become some of those ‘nice guys’ who get used by women.

The common genre for anime girls called “tsundere“, which refers to a stubborn woman who is abusive to the man she likes, is very popular, shows like Sword Art Online, Bleach, Toradora, DBZ, etc. I could name a hundred more, but that would mean I would include almost every anime. And not just any people are influenced, but the most desperate men across the world. Men who have never had any luck with women are always attempting to fulfill a woman’s most dangerous desires just to keep her.

These shows are not only designed to destroy the male image and present it as inferior, but also to ruin their self confidence as human beings for being male. In dozens of anime, males are portrayed as either weak, or stupid, similar to how Daddy pig in the cartoon Peppa Pig is simply made to be laughed at, or how the main male cast of the Simpsons slowly degraded into ambition-less couch potatoes and the women becoming political figures.

...

Go-Girl-ism And Male Bashing

If you grew up watching TV in the 1990s, there is no way you escaped seeing at least a few episodes of Sailor Moon. It redefined the “magical girl” genre in its native Japan and its overseas influence has shown up in girl-power shows like The Powerpuff Girls and is the definition of a feminist anime. Haruka and Michiru, the series’ Sailor Uranus and Neptune, were a lesbian couple who helped girls around the world come to terms with their sexuality. The series also makes a point of commenting on how the less traditionally feminine girls have trouble coping with gender roles, like how Makoto learned to cook because she was teased for being a tomboy.

...

The “girl power” concept is counter productive, but unfortunately it’s an inescapable void of entertainment, Charlies Angles, Steven Universe (where the male character is a boy who learns from women), Taylor Swift videos, etc. Australia’s national women’s soccer team the Matildas lose 7-0 to an under FIFTEENS boys’ side, we know that story.

I decided to look up on the internet for further research. Apparently many men have the same opinion. As I’ve read on an MGTOW (anti-feminist, red pill) site:

" “…my friend’s been watching this anime called great teacher onizuka and it makes me fucking cringe. The women in that anime do terrible things to the main character. for instance, there’s a girl who lures him into a laundry mat promising sexual favors, but instead, she takes off her clothes, takes his shirt, puts in on, tears it up a bit, and makes him wear all these kinky things only to scream and call for the police claiming sexual assault. The teacher eventually just acts like it wasn’t a big deal. Also, there’s an episode where a female student of his runs into a building she knows is going to be bombed because she wanted to save a fucking piano.

“…today i witnessed something really disgusting in that anime. The students are on a field trip to a tropical island and one of the boys is kidnapped by three other female students. He’s a small, submissive type so he doesn’t fight back. They tie him up and blind fold him before leading him deep into the jungle. Basically, the leader of the three females wanted to leave him there to die because she hated how much of a loser/crybaby he is. She expressed disdain for how he just listened to whatever people told him to do (sounds familiar). Eventually, the girls realize they’re lost and start blaming the boy for everything. They tell him to man up and get them out of the situation and when he starts to take authority by telling them to remain calm… “"

...

Male disposability in anime was the right word I was looking for. Naruto has plenty of scenes where he is beaten up by women. Not to forget, where I thought Gintama would be free of male bashing, where Shimura Tae, a smiley woman constantly beats up a ‘hairy’ man – simply for asking her out.

Is this supposed to be comedy?

There’s plenty of hentai anime, like Girls Bravo for example, a blue haired boy who is mocked for being short by his female school mates, he is bullied to the point where he’s even ‘allergic’ to women. (Imagine an anime where a girl was treated like trash because she was fat). In one scene of the first episode, the boy accident walks into the bathroom where his female neighbour was taking a shower. She screams and throws a tantrum, she brutally beats him up, where his nose begins to bleed, until he falls into a tub, where he is eventually woken up in a planet where there are only women, however, since he was the only male on the planet, he is sexually harassed constantly through out the episodes and women molest him.

Being an Hentai (porn/pervert/sexual) anime, aimed for men, abusing boys seems to be normalized. In most households of Japan, women control all the finances. I wonder if Japanese men get domestically violated by women the same way as in anime.

Low Birth Rates In Japan

...

Feminization of men is also an issue, perhaps the decline in population is simply because of this hidden feminism in Japan. In Btoom!, a hunger games styled anime, Himiko always carries a stun gun whenever she goes because she is afraid of being touched by men. Her fear of men stems her past experiences with men who attempted to rape her. Her trauma is so severe that she announces to Ryota that every man on the island is her enemy. On two separate occasions when she is about to lose to a man, who is usually attempting to sexually assault her, she was willing to kill herself along with the enemy using a bomb. Almost every man in the anime attempts to assault her. The male protagonist of the story is a ‘wussy’ who simply allows her to treat him with distaste (yet another stereotypical main male character in anime).

While I was on my final anime, which I watched for research, Mirai Nikki, the female character Yuno will resort to cruel and usually violent methods, most of the time coming out of nowhere, that generally end in bloody deaths of anyone who tries to get in the path of the boy she likes, even if they are his close relatives, effectively making her a “Yandere“. The young girl seems to be having the “othello syndrome”, a type of delusional jealousy, marked by suspecting a faithful partner of infidelity, with accompanying jealousy, attempts at monitoring and control, and even violence. Many men often suffer when their wives who are extremely jealous, where as this “yandere” genre is particular that of a girl who stalks her lover, keeps him away from everyone he loves simply because she wants him as her property.

...

I also stumbled upon an incomplete game, about a playable Yandere girl, which had many references to Mirai Nikki, on starting the game I had a picture on what it was about. Your character is simply an emotionless teenage girl who harbors feelings for a guy who doesn’t even know she exists. Your mission is to stalk him, and try to eliminate “rivals”, so that she has him for herself. By eliminate meaning, to kill. The game would even include your crush’s sister, who has a chance of being a rival. (Think of a scenario where a boy would be stalking a girl, taking her belongings, sniffing or licking them to gain arousal, where he tries to keep her friends away from her, there would be a different response)

In the basement of the game, one would come across tape recording, when played, it reveals that your character’s mother (I assume) murdered everyone close to her crush, and tied him down onto a chair, forcing him to give in to her requests.

...

Recently, I was informed that the developing team had added a tsundere character and a pedophile teacher into the game, who would seduce him perhaps, I don’t feel the need to talk anymore about it.

A pedophilic female teacher who preys on a teenage boy’s sexuality. There’s plenty of harem (a anime with one guy and many female characters) where he is eventually mistreated by his female counterparts. Even many of Hayao Miyazaki’s films are centered on young “strong empowered” girls. When asked about it, he said:

"“When we compare a man in action and a girl in action, I feel girls are more gallant. If a boy is walking with a long stride, I don’t think anything particular, but if a girl is walking gallantly, I feel ‘that’s cool’. Maybe that’s because I’m a man, and women may think it’s cool when they see a young man striding. At first, I thought ‘this is no longer the era of men‘.But after ten years, I grew tired of saying that. I just say ‘cause I like women’. They are more reality.”"

All these point out why there are sites entirely dedicated to feminism in anime.

Yesterday, I decided to get in touch with my friend, to ask him about his life and job. He’s a stereotypical “nice guy” who remains friend zoned. He lets women pinch his cheeks and push him, when he just laughs it off. If a woman does something unfair to him, he simply sweeps it under the rug.

“I’m not interested in dating currently” he said when I asked him if he had a girlfriend. Either anime had terrorized him to protecting his virginity, or he’s simply happy being treated like a loser in a tsundere anime by his female co-workers, just like the great teacher Onizuka.

MizzouLife #conspiracy illuminati.wikia.com

The New Day is a WWE "stable" or group that is intended to push the Homosexual Agenda. The highly effeminate colors the characters wear function to display sexual role reversal. The promiscuous sexual comments that are thrown in help suggest that people have sexual urges all the time. The reversed sexual role the characters play psychologically confuses the viewer, mainly children, into accepting homosexuality as well as being conditioned to accept the rest of the Luciferian Sexual Agenda.

One of the characters plays a trombone during the match that adds humor to certain parts, mainly when moves are being executed. In line with the Feminine characteristics of the group, the trombone is named 'Francesca'.

Their celebrations further promote incest and homosexuality by getting close to and touching one another while laying on their backs and thrusting their crotches in the air.

AnimeIsForLosers #racist stormfront.org

I am sick of seeing so many white nationalists who think it's okay to admire non-white culture. You guys are walking down a slippery slope.
First, it's "Don't worry. I still prefer whites. I just like to experience other cultures. I'm still a WN." The next thing you know, you're a beta loser weeaboo who's humping a plastic waifu doll you ordered from Japan.

More seriously, I'm surprised that no white person here figured out that the Jews run anime shows. Are you guys really that blind? How could you not see such blatant leftist propaganda in those shows?
You don't believe me? You think the japs hate jews and would never sell their souls? Well, let's do a cursory analysis on popular anime shows and compare them to the leftist agenda shall we?

Dragon Ball Z: Some Saiyan-being from another planet comes to earth, breeds with humans (Race-mixing) and has a mixed-raced son who is more powerful than he is.
Inuyasha: Story about some half-breed demon. Author tries to make breeding with humans and demons "cool".
Pokemon: You can breed different species of pokemon to create a "better" pokemon. Brainwashes little kids into thinking that mixing with others outside of their race will produce healthier offsprings.

Many many more examples.

The next time you watch anime on your computer or TV, always remember that you're doing white culture a disservice. It's like cheating on your wife.

Elvis is King #fundie rationalwiki.org

God has proven Himself in so many different ways yet liberals refuse to admit evolution is a hoax that Darwin made up to justify engaging in bestality with monkeys. Homo relations simply bear no fruit and kids raised without a mother AND father are more likely to have a sad childhood and will be confused about God's natural laws. A man and a woman being in union with one another in holy matrimony is as simply understood as gravity. Yet liberals seem deeply confused about how this works because they lack the moral clarity the Bible provides. Taylor Swift is an evil succubus and I am confused as to why obscenity laws aren't being enforced. They're used to keep porn off the channel next to Cartoon Network so kids don't watch porn, and therefore because obscenity isn't protected speech the blatant sexual nature of Taylor Swift is unprotected obscenity that no one in the right mind should enjoy. The moaning and the breasts and all of the twerking and blowing of kisses and everything. --Elvis is King (talk) 04:31, 18 December 2016 (

Amos Moses/Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Cartoon Network promotes 'Pride Month' to young children

Cartoon Network, the popular television channel watched by millions of children, promoted LGBT pride month by using one of its widely popular shows to encourage fans to “stand proud."

LGBT activists have designated June as “pride month” to celebrate alternative sexual lifestyles and gender identities, and Cartoon Network took to Twitter last week to voice its solidarity with the movement as thousands take part in events nationwide.

“We want to wish everyone a HAPPY PRIDE and encourage all of our LGBTQ+ fans to stand proud all year long!” the network, which is owned by Warner Bros., tweeted along with emojis representing a rainbow flag, heart and a unicorn.

The tweet also included a picture of characters from its popular reboot show “Powerpuff Girls.”

The tweet included the hashtags “#powerpuffyourself,” “#pridemonth” and “#powerfuffgirls.”

The network is up there with the likes Nickelodeon and the Disney Channel as being television outlets favorited by children because of the number of cartoons that it broadcasts throughout the week.

Cartoon Network bills itself as being “the best in original, acquired and classic entertainment for youth and families.” However, many parents object to media outlets pushing an agenda that contradicts their own beliefs on sexuality and marriage.

Twitter is not the only place where Cartoon Network is promoting LGBT pride, however. Cartoon Network is also doing so through its online shop and some of its cartoon characters themselves.

Last year, it is believed that Cartoon Network’s animated show “Steven Universe” became the first children’s show to feature a same-sex wedding proposal. The proposal was between female characters named Sapphire and Ruby.

Additionally, Cartoon Network’s “Adventure Time” series aired a scene in its series finale last year that showed two female characters kissing each other on the lips. The scene confirmed years of speculation that the two were lesbians.

On its website, Cartoon Network is celebrating pride week by promoting its Steven Universe “made of love” collection. The collection includes LGBT-themed apparel and memorabilia.

Although Cartoon Network’s webshop only sells to parents or adults, children are just a click away from seeing listings for “Steven Universe” LGBT-pride pins, a “Steven Universe” rainbow-themed “made of love” patch and even a “Steven Universe” “kissing tote bag.”

The website also sells a “Steven Universe” “reunited” throw pillow and T-shirt. The tote bag, shirt, and throw pillow all feature the same decal of the two female characters kissing.

“Love is in the air! This multicolored pillow celebrates the Ruby and Sapphire on their wedding day,” the listing reads. “Double sided, this pillow features the happy couple at the altar on both sides.”

Cartoon Network is not the only children’s network that uses its program to shine a light on LGBT relationships.

In 2016, Nickelodeon incorporated a biracial, same-sex couple into one of its shows called “The Loud House.”


Amos Moses:
BECAUSE HOMOMIRAGE AND PEDOPHILIA ARE NOT CONNECTED ..... yeah right .....

Lady Checkmate:
(reposts several of her “stop sexualizing children” memes)

Amos Moses:
more of the benefits of homomirage ..............

Dumso #fundie reddit.com

What rights do adults have to deny kids their sexuality?

Human beings are sexual beings, from conception.

Babies touch their genitals and feel good about it. So they repeat time and time again.

As they grow older, they continue to seek and find pleasure out of touching their bodies, they discover where and how they like to touch and be touched.

Preteens and pre-puberty kids are just absolutely curious about their bodies and of their piers male and female. They start having a lot of intentional pleasure by touching and rubbing themselves.

And obviously during puberty their sexuality flourishes, they do learn and seek pleasure out of sex.

So why do we insist that kids cannot have sex, feel pleasure and show themselves? They like it! Showing themselves is part of their sexuality, most do enjoy it . They show and they see. Kids are eager for porn, they learn through porn. And today kids have a lot more knowledge about sex and their bodies thanks to porn that is freely available.

A 13 year old boy does not always have the chance to see a naked 13 year old girl if not through porn. Why deny them this growing and learning experience?

If kids did not enjoy sex we would not find so many of them on Omegle and the likes. They are there. They want to show, they want to see, they want to have pleasure! It's their right.

Adults do not have the right to deny them this their right.

Bryan Fischer #fundie rightwingwatch.org

On his radio program yesterday, Bryan Fischer quoted Martin Luther King, Jr.'s iconic "I Have a Dream" speech to argue in favor of discrimination against gays.

Citing King's line that he dreamed that one day his children would "live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character," Fischer argued that discrimination based on behavior is justified and absolutely appropriate ... and, as such, "you begin to see the implications when it comes to homosexuality because you're dealing there with issues of content of character and you are dealing with issues of behavior and conduct and it's perfectly appropriate to discriminate against immoral conduct":

marti99 #fundie tv.com

(Seemed to fit both FSTDT & CSTDT, flipped a coin)

People are wayyy too dumb to understand that this show isn't So if an illumanti symbol is on a dollar bill, it's bad. But if it's on a KID cartoon, it's totally fine? If it's subtle bad language, nudity, or something along that line on a kid show, it's bad. But if it's subtle SATANIC symbols and secret messages, it's fine? Yeah, that totally makes sense. ILLUMINATI is ILLUMINATI no matter what. People think that it's just a cartoon, and it's nothing. They're just cutesy wittle symbols that don't mean a thing, even though it's been known that it's a satanic and symbol. But for some reason, if you wear a shirt with that symbol to school, you'll get in trouble?Open your eyes, dummies. Do you people really want kids to be drawing illuminati symbols? I remember going to the mall, and some dude was wearing a shirt with the pyramid and the eye. There was a kid who was like, "Mommy, mommy, look! He's wearing a Gravity Falls shirt!" Kids are innocent, and these so-called "kid-friendly" animators are destroying them. Do they really think kids 11 and under would de-code messages that appear for like a second? Will they get programs to play secret messages backwards? What's the point of even doing something like this for kids if they don't understand what's going on? Oh yeah, because it's brainwash. I think it would've been a great cartoon if they didn't add these symbols creepy secret messages. I mean, good plot, characters, animation, humor? Awesome. Also, it's cool to see Disney branching out to different genres. I think a mystery show for kids was a great idea. But satanic symbols and secret messages? Not so much.

roxy-receipts #fundie roxy-receipts.tumblr.com

[Without a doubt THE worst thing to ever come out of Tumblr, ever. Emphasis by me.]

PSA regarding Roxy, AKA blockman42774 and segadreamcastwebbrowser2point0

roxy, who currently goes by @segadreamcastwebbrowser2point0 and formerly nekommunism is an outed pedophile and weeaboo “funnyman” who formerly ran clown-names and currently runs @blockman42774?, more information and details are under the cut
[...]
Roxy being a pedophile:
roxy watches anime and regularly posts about it in her server, often making sexual jokes despite the server containing minors
roxy has made sexual comments towards characters such as mugi from k-on and noodle from gorillaz. Although both are adults, they were initially 16 and 10 respectively when they debuted (roxy is 18)
roxy has referred to love live character nico yazawa as her “waifu” despite being 18 while nico is 17
[...]
roxy tends to make general comments about “anime tiddies” and other sex-related things and sarcastically responds to requests to stop by claiming its homophobia (before you start, although she claims to be against the sexualization of children in anime, the nature of anime character design and moefication means that all anime girls regardless of age are intended to cater to pedophiles)
[...]
additional comments:
roxy regularly makes fun of the people who made the initial callout, despite them being minors
[...]
roxy follows slimetony, a pedophile apologist (he defended clown-names) and antisemite [Submitter's note: clown-names is also ran by the aforementioned "Roxy". Roxy is a pedophile because she follows slimetony who is a pedophile apologist because he defended Roxy. Circular logic at its finest.]
roxy browses reddit and regularly uses greentext arrows, which she calls “meme arrows“ in a 4channy way (she regularly mocked @susanr for complaining about this)
roxy is white, but in spite of this regularly reblogs pro-poc posts
roxy also uses aave despite being white, generally saying “y’all” a lot as well as “we out here“ and “dope“

NoFirstDog #fundie citizensbriefingbook.change.gov

[ On a "pledge" that requires Obama to instate universal children's health insurance before he gets a dog for his girls. It's a nice sentiment, but the author's batshit ]

If you’re a Christian and believe in the Bible, you understand that God did not give souls to animals – and for good reason. No, Virginia, there is no “doggie heaven”.

. . .

As we all sadly know, the N-a-z-i-s were NOT a kinder or gentler nation because of their love of animals.

In reality, this “love of animals” only served to lessen and decimate the intrinsic value of human life while acting as a springboard for the mass murder of millions of people.

Ghandi claimed that you can judge a society by the way it treats its animals. If this is true, Ghandi thought the N-a-z-i-s were nice people!

If you have young children in school, you should be aware that animal “rights” fanatics have infiltrated our classrooms - nationwide. They present themselves as people (vegans) concerned with the unhealthy eating habits of children. In reality, they are pushing an animal “rights” agenda to young and vulnerable children. They also gain entry using the local humane societies and animal welfare groups – brainwashing children that saving dogs and cats makes them better people – much like the N-a-z-i-s did!

Fortunately for the human race, the N-a-z-i-s didn’t have the 35 billion dollar per year pet supply industry helping them push their dangerous, inhumane and illogical animal “rights” agenda. However, today in the U.S. they do! Not to mention the help they get from Hollywood.

This season, the “save a dog or cat from a shelter” campaign is in full swing.
What better way to brainwash children than to force their parents to take them to a movie like “hotel for dogs”.

Julie Gunlock #fundie nypost.com

As a mom of three young kids, I’m careful about what they’re exposed to on television, and I screen the shows they watch to confirm they reflect our family values of respect and courteousness. That’s why my kids are banned from watching the Disney Channel.

The Disney Channel and its spin-off, Disney XD, are no longer “safe spaces” for kids. The kid characters on Disney’s shows are often mouthy and disrespectful to parents and authority figures (who are usually scripted as muddle-headed and embarrassingly square). Even many of the strange animated characters make crass and nasty comments.

Shockingly, both my conservative and liberal parent friends tend to be angered by Disney’s programming. And in the Trump era, moms treasure these rare moments of bipartisan disgust.

Of course, some defend Disney, saying the company is only reflecting our culture and doing what all corporations do by responding to consumer demand. Yet maybe the company should reconsider caving in to the worst impulses of an immature demographic — Disney XD is designed for kids aged 6 to 14.

After all, Disney has another consumer to consider — the wearied parent battling modern culture to instill principles of kindness, politeness and respect of elders. This Sisyphean task is made more difficult when kids get a regular dose of vulgar speech, crude jokes and insolent behavior on a channel designed for kids.

If that isn’t enough, Disney has now decided to throw some sex and gender issues into the mix.

Small-screen shows like “Andi Mack” featured a tween character coming to terms with his own sexuality.

Disney is pushing boundaries even further by attempting to address the transgender issue.

On a recent episode of the Disney XD show “Star vs. the Forces of Evil,” a young boy dresses up as Princess Marco Turdina — get it? Turd-ina — in order to rescue a group of girls from the evil headmistress at St. Olga’s Reform School for Wayward Princesses. Sounds tame, right? Boy rescues girls, how traditional.

But when the boy is revealed to be — gasp! — a boy by the headmistress who reveals he has chest hair under his princess costume, the young girls rally around him and launch into the sort of social-justice lecture one might see playing out on the University of California, Berkeley campus.

The scene begins with the headmistress shouting, “Turdina isn’t a princess. She’s a boy!” To which the girls, responding to such a disgusting display of gender bigotry, offer a chorus of defense for Turdina, shouting down the headmistress with comments like:

“Why does it matter if he’s a boy? Nothing he said was wrong!” “He can be a princess if he wants to!” “Turdina is a state of mind!”

No doubt, Disney writers understood this scene would make parents uncomfortable, but what they didn’t understand is the nature of the discomfort.
Sure, some will be unhappy with the transgender-embracing message, but most will be more concerned that kids are being told it’s OK to shout down an adult.

Is that how we want children acting — shouting down authority figures? Oh, wait, they’re already doing that. Again, just look at our college campuses.

We hear a lot from the left about how corporations have a duty to make the world a better place for all mankind.

In response to activist pressure, most corporations give lavishly to environmental causes. Corporations are told they must diversify their workforce. As such, most major corporations, both old and new, have initiated a variety of badly managed “Corporate Diversity Programs” that have done nothing more than increase tension in the workforce.

Corporations do these things because the public demands it — and to avoid lawsuits.

When it comes to how parents feel and how most parents want to raise kids, Disney seems to think it has zero responsibility.

That’s not going to change until parents start pushing back — or, you know, start pushing the television’s “off” button when Disney comes on.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

And so, don't be an idiot and think that Donald Trump as U.S. President is going to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! It won't happen. My friend, America will NEVER be great again until we turn back to a holy God...

America will NEVER be great again until we once again believe the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.
America will NEVER be great again until we repent and turn back to the God of the Holy Bible.
America will NEVER be great again until we burn Hollywood's cesspool of iniquity to the ground.
America will NEVER be great again until we dismantle Las Vegas (aka, “SIN CITY”) completely.
America will NEVER be great again until we eliminate the filth and covetousness on the internet.
America will NEVER be great again until we get rid of all the illicit gambling casinos and strip clubs.
America will NEVER be great again until we spend more time with God and family than the television.
America will NEVER be great again until we do away with the Federal Reserve Banks and fiat money.
America will NEVER be great again until we bring the King James Bible back into America's classrooms.
America will NEVER be great again until we bring the King James Bible back into America's churches.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop indoctrinating children with the satanic lies of Evolution.
America will NEVER be great again until we burn all the counterfeit Bible revisions in our churches.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop voting for the lesser of two evils, and not vote for evil at all.
America will NEVER be great again until we prosecute the CIA for trafficking drugs into the United States.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop allowing people to get divorced for any reason at all.
America will NEVER be great again until we bring back the tens-of-millions of lost jobs from foreign slave labor.
America will NEVER be great again until we drain the swamp in Washington DC and elect honest leaders.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop the sexual exploitation of youth through the music industry.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop supporting manmade Illuminati Israel since 1948.
America will NEVER be great again until we America's women forsake feminism and start obeying their husbands.
America will NEVER be great again until men forsake Hooters, Playboy and internet porn and start thinking pure.
America will NEVER be great again until we start moving toward rural living instead of big city urbanization.
America will NEVER be great again until we make same-sex abominations illegal, and stop gays from adopting children.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop letting Globalists exploit the U.S. toward World Government.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop lawyers and judges from raping citizens, bilking them financially.
America will NEVER be great again until we get away from big government and big cities, which promote indifference.
America will NEVER be great again until we enforce border security and ship millions of illegal aliens back home.
America will NEVER be great again until we start rehabilitating prison inmates instead of locking them away.
America will NEVER be great again until we run the ungodly manure-spreading newsmedia out of the country.
America will NEVER be great again until we restore state's rights and limit the power of federal government.
America will NEVER be great again until we get back to little league and recreation, instead of kids parked in front of TV.
America will NEVER be great again until we return to the Christian principles upon which our nation was built.

I could list a thousand more things wrong in the U.S. today. We've lost so much in America! I think our country is doomed, because once sin infests a nation, only one of two things can turn it back to righteousness: 1) Bible-preaching, or 2) God's judgment. Since pastors don't preach anymore, and counterfeit Bible revisions have flooded into the churches, and “the simplicity that is in Christ” (the Gospel, 2nd Corinthians 11:3) has been replaced with false repentance, and churches are supporting manmade Illuminati Israel (thus consequently supporting the New World Order), it appears that all hope is gone, and only God's judgment can save us now!

Boy Scouts allow homosexual scout leaders. That is sickening! If you go fishing, officers and park rangers can confiscate everything you own if you don't know that you are required to pay for a fishing permit. I think that ruins America! Due to liability, many organizations are reluctant to host little league games and other fun activities for children. And now with the pedophile problem—which is a direct consequence of removing the Bible from the schools, Playboy magazine, sensual rock music, feminism, dying churches, homosexuality, the lies of Evolution, the evil influences on television, divorce (no father in the home), Hollywood and the general moral downfall of America—everyone is paranoid about their neighbours these days! How could America ever be great again in such a wicked climate? Everything is deteriorating quickly with a domino effect. We haven't seen anything yet. The daily news already cannot keep up with the abundance of heinous crimes being committed across America. Americans have become extremely covetous and materialistic. Psalms 135:15, “The idols of the heathen are silver and gold, the work of men's hands.”

Matt Forney #fundie gab.ai

[Are the alt-right turning on their God-Emperor? Will he be dismissed as yet another tool of the globalist establishment? Find out next time on Dragon Ball Z!]

Plot twist: the REAL "4D chess" Trump was engaging in was convincing far-right nationalists to enthusiastically support what amounted to a third term for George W. Bush.

Old Man Montgomery #fundie oldmanmontgomery.wordpress.com

[=Authors Note: For the sake of trimming, some of the Bible verses in the original page have been removed=]

From the website of ‘johnshore.com’

These were published and dated December 16, 2010. I have only recently become aware of this ‘movement’ via Facebook. (One never knows what one will find there.) These are referred to as the “Sixteen Tenets of ‘unfundamentalist Christians’ , known also or previously known as ‘ThruWay Christians’. Being the old-fashioned, hard-nosed Bible thumper that I am, I disagree with some facets of this and the conclusions of the entirety.

Of course I have reasons and those reasons are published below. Just for convenience, I numbered the statements, replacing what appeared in my copy as a paragraph ‘dot’.

Just for the record, as the article was dated December 16, 2010, it is entirely possible Mr. Shore has completely changed his mind and recanted this whole document. On the other hand, I just checked Mr. Shore’s last blog entry and he’s still pitching the “UnFund” theme.

Caution: If the reader is not a Christian believer, much of this discussion will seem pointless. Feel free to read on, but if you’re confused, don’t worry, it happens to lots of folks.

Here beings the tenets:

1. Jesus Christ was God incarnate. He performed miracles; as a means of providing for the irrevocable reconciliation of humankind to God he sacrificed himself on the cross; he rose from the dead; he left behind for the benefit of all people the totality of himself in the form of the indwelling Holy Spirit.

So far, I’m in agreement. Jesus is God incarnate; the ‘Son’ who is God Himself. Jesus was executed and killed (no alternatives) on a Roman cross under Roman law. Jesus’ death was the final sacrifice needed to atone for the sin of all people who appeal to Him for forgiveness. Jesus rose from the dead on the third day showing Himself to be God and giving a promise to all of an Eternal life in Heaven with Him. He sent the Third Person of the Godhead, the ‘Holy Spirit’ to believers after His ascension.

2. Christ and Christianity are meant to be understood, appreciated, and experienced as galvanizing inspirations for living a life of love, compassion, fairness, peace, and humility. Period.

Now we’re disagreeing. The primary purpose and function of Christianity is to repair the breach between God and mankind due to mankind’s rebellion and disobedience. Being forgiven by Jesus and redeemed by His sacrifice, mankind can have a direct and proper relationship with God. The qualities of love, compassion, fairness, peace and humility are by-products of that proper relationship, not the primary aim.

Am I splitting hairs here? Not as much as one might think; the matter becomes clearer as we proceed.

3. The Bible is a collection of a great many separate documents written by different people in different languages over thousands of years. Properly understanding both the letter and spirit of the Bible necessarily entails taking into account the historical and cultural contexts that so greatly inform so much of its text. The size, density, history and complexity of the Bible render unfeasible the idea that not one of its words reflects more man’s will than God’s. The spirit of God is inerrant; people—even those impassioned by the conviction that God is speaking directly to or through them—are not.

The one starts out well and descends into heresy. The Bible was written over a period of approximately 1500 years. The Books of Moses, the Torah – sometimes Pentateuch, was written in the period between the Exodus from Egypt, around 1400 B. C. to the time of the Babylonian Captivity, around 600 to 530 B. C. (give or take a decade or so.) The book of Revelation, written by John the Apostle was written around 90 A. D. The rest was written somewhere in between, with the possible exception of Job. Job was one of the earliest sections written and may predate Moses. The Bible was assuredly written by at least forty different authors. (For instance, the books of Judges, Kings and Chronicles were written over periods of time and one author could not have written them all; they require accounts from events several hundred years apart. The Torah was more than likely written by a number of scribes with Moses or a later, Babylonian scholar as ‘editor’ and having final input. Genesis is obviously based on oral traditions of the Israelite nation.) The books reflect social conventions and cultural coloring of the times involved.

However, it is the message of Almighty God to humanity. No matter how much a human can foul up, the integrity of the message is based on God’s ability to ensure His message is properly passed on. No human can foul up or outright lie good enough to defeat God’s purpose. So as much as mankind wrote the words on paper (papyrus or whatever), the ‘Word’ (Greek ‘logos’, meaning idea, identity or concept) is that of God. As such, it is inerrant in message.

The idea of the Bible being ‘written by man and therefore possibly distorted’ is an old heresy. It was argued about in the earliest councils trying to settle on the ‘Bible’ and is the basis for several cults who claim to be Christian, but rely on teachings of extra Biblical origin. The heresy also finds much favor among those who wish to discredit any one particular facet of Christian doctrine. Under any version, the idea the Bible isn’t correct means either God really doesn’t care about the message or God is incapable of protecting His own plan. Christians cannot in good faith (no pun intended) accept either alternative.

4. Anyone seeking to mix church and state has failed to understand the nature and proper role of either. Belief that all people are created equal and are deserving of equal protection under the law is foundational to all modern democratic nations. To incorporate the inherently exclusionary imperatives of a particular religion into the determinedly inclusive system of democracy would be to undermine the very spirit of democracy by pushing it toward a theocracy.

This is a pretty silly statement and is highly ignorant of history. The ‘foundational’ belief of people being created equal and deserving equal protection under law is uniquely derived from the Judeo-Christian tradition. It is not found in Islam, Confucianism, Buddhism, Hinduism or any of the other ‘religions’ of the world. It is Christianity that fostered Democracy, not Democracy that fostered Christianity.

Additionally, it was Christian believers and supporters who founded the United States as a nation with no state religion. The United States was not founded as a ‘Christian nation’, but was indeed begun as a ‘nation of Christians’. To pretend otherwise is to ignore history and to invite serious question as to the point of the discussion. One must also note that all movements to ‘remove’ the influence of Christianity from the United States and civil laws result in the promotion of either Secular Humanism or Islam.

There are no moral vacuums.

5. It’s not possible to read Paul’s New Testament writings and remain unmoved by his open heart, intellectual prowess, and staggering bravery. And yet Paul (who, after all, spent years zealously persecuting and having executed untold numbers of Christians) must remain to us a mortal man. More than reasonable, it is incumbent upon those who claim to seek the deepest knowledge of Christ to subject the words of Paul to the same kinds of objective analysis we would the words of any man daring to describe the qualities, purposes, and desires of God.

This is a gentle, lofty and seemingly reasonable attempt to undermine the message presented by God through Paul the Apostle. What this statement does is deny the Divine inspiration and authorship of the Bible as a whole. It returns to the fore in a moment with more of the ‘villify Paul’ agenda.

6. With regards to the written identity of God, the pronoun “he” is a necessity of the English language, not an actual anatomical designation. God is neither male nor female; God contains all of both.

Again, agreement. In Hebrew, just as in English, the male pronoun unless specifically intended refers to both male and female. Jesus says (John 4:23 and 24)“But a time is coming – and now is here – when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father seeks such people to be his worshipers. God is spirit, and the people who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.” Also one notes in Genesis (chapter one, verses 26 and 27)
“Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, after our likeness, so they may rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move on the earth.”
God created humankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them,
male and female he created them.

So, both male and female were (still are, more or less, being distorted from the original model by mankind’s disobedience) created in God’s image; which manifestly means not a physical image, but a mental and spiritual image.

7. The Biblical scholarship supporting the idea that Paul never wrote a word proscribing natural homosexuality is at least as credible and persuasive as the scholarship (if not typical Bible translations) claiming that he did. Any person who uses the words of Paul in the New Testament to “prove” that homosexuality is a sin against God has either never themselves researched the matter, or has simply chosen to believe one set of equal proofs over another. Though laziness is easily enough understood, we remain mystified as to why anyone who purports to follow Jesus would choose to condemn an entire population over choosing to obey Jesus’ self-proclaimed Greatest Commandment to love one’s neighbor as one loves oneself.

Here’s the follow up to point 5. Once Paul is ‘questionable’, the condemnation of homosexuality can be dismissed as a personal quirk, or possibly an outright error on the part of Christianity (on the whole).

Here’s the premise of the tenet: Paul either really didn’t mean what he wrote about the practice of homosexuality despite what is clearly written in the original Greek manuscripts and all subsequent translations of the Bible, or Paul was mistaken and therefore not inspired by God. What an amazing statement.

Either God inspired and authored the Bible or not. If one chooses to deny God’s inspiration in part, then the whole becomes suspect. If God was lax in allowing Paul to write and publish errors, then what of the rest of the Bible is trustworthy? Conversely, if God did in fact inspire and author the Bible, then Paul’s writing is equally trustworthy.

Leviticus 18
This entire section (several chapters) deals with sexual sins and prohibitions. In part (I have inserted whole paragraphs to present an in context view):
19 You must not approach a woman in her menstrual impurity to have sexual intercourse with her. 20 You must not have sexual intercourse with the wife of your fellow citizen to become unclean with her. 21 You must not give any of your children as an offering to Molech, so that you do not profane the name of your God. I am the Lord! 22 You must not have sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman; it is a detestable act. 23 You must not have sexual intercourse with any animal to become defiled with it, and a woman must not stand before an animal to have sexual intercourse with it; it is a perversion.
Leviticus 20
9 “‘If anyone curses his father and mother he must be put to death. He has cursed his
father and mother; his blood guilt is on himself. 10 If a man commits adultery with his neighbor’s wife, both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death. 11 If a man has sexual intercourse with his father’s wife, he has exposed his father’s nakedness. Both of them must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves. 12 If a man has sexual intercourse with his daughter-in-law, both of them must be put to death. They have committed perversion; their blood guilt is on themselves. 13 If a man has sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman, the two of them have committed an abomination. They must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves. 14 If a man has sexual intercourse with both a woman and her mother, it is lewdness. Both he and they must be burned to death, so there is no lewdness in your midst. 15 If a man has sexual intercourse with any animal, he must be put to death, and you must kill the animal. 16 If a woman approaches any animal to have sexual intercourse with it, you must kill the woman, and the animal must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves.

These two passages are from the Torah, the first five books of the Old Testament. One can argue these are part of the Jewish or Mosaic Law and are therefore obsolete; in that case, general adultery, incest and bestiality are also permitted along with homosexual conduct. Or is that the point?

First Timothy 1 (written by that suspect Paul fellow)

8 But we know that the law is good if someone uses it legitimately, 9 realizing that law is not intended for a righteous person, but for lawless and rebellious people, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 sexually immoral people, practicing homosexuals, kidnappers, liars, perjurers – in fact, for any who live contrary to sound teaching. 11 This accords with the glorious gospel of the blessed God that was entrusted to me.

There is a note on the phrase ‘practicing homosexuals’ in verse 10 from the NET Bible: “…this term… ??se?????t?? states, “a male who engages in sexual activity w. a pers. of his own sex, pederast 1 Cor 6:9…of one who assumes the dominant role in same-sex activity, opp. µa?a???…1 Ti 1:10; Pol 5:3. Cp. Ro 1:27.” L&N 88.280 states, “a male partner in homosexual intercourse – ‘homosexual.’…It is possible that ??se?????t?? in certain contexts refers to the active male partner in homosexual intercourse in contrast with µa?a???, the passive male partner” (cf. 1 Cor 6:9). Since there is a distinction in contemporary usage between sexual orientation and actual behavior, the qualification “practicing” was supplied in the translation…”

First Corinthians 6 (also written by that questionable Paul)
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! The sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, passive homosexual partners, practicing homosexuals, 10 thieves, the greedy, drunkards, the verbally abusive, and swindlers will not inherit the kingdom of God. 11 Some of you once lived this way. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

This last passage strikes me an illuminating. Homosexuals are included in a list of sin categories which include heterosexual sexual sinners, idolaters, adulterers (distinct from ‘sexually immoral heterosexuals), thieves, greedy, drunkards, verbally abusive and swindlers. The phrase ‘verbally abusive’ is rather interesting. The NIV translates it as ‘slanderers’; I think ‘gossips’ might easily fit into the meaning. At any rate, people who say nasty things about others are lumped in with murderers, thieves and the sexually immoral (of any type).

The last verse in the paragraph implies a change of life in those reading the letter. “Some of you … lived… But you were washed… sanctified… justified…” So they were not just forgiven and allowed to continue; they changed their values and life-styles. The same implication applies to the sexually impure; they don’t do that sort of thing anymore; they avoid that sort of thing; they are ashamed of and denounce their own past behavior.

Therefore, the Old Testament writings prohibited homosexual conduct as does the writings of Paul, therefore the New Testament. The words used really do mean homosexual conduct and not just the generic ‘sexual misconduct’.

I’m really curious about the ‘equal scholarship’ which demonstrates what the Bible says isn’t what it means. I’d like to examine the line of thought and arguments.

The statement “…Jesus’ self-proclaimed Greatest Commandment to love one’s neighbor as one loves oneself” is incorrect and sloppy scholarship.

Matthew 22:
35 And one of them, an expert in religious law, asked him a question to test him: 36 “Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?” 37 Jesus 44 said to him, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ 38 This is the first and greatest commandment.

This tenet goes past ‘unfundamentalism’ and is squarely non-Christian.

8. It is much more reasonable—and certainly more compassionate—to hold that throughout history God chose to introduce himself in different ways into different cultural streams than it is to believe that there is only one correct way to understand and worship God, and that the punishment for anyone who chooses any but that way is to spend all of eternity having the living flesh seared off of his or her bones.

More reasonable? By who’s standard? As a Christian, the only viewpoint that counts is God’s viewpoint. That ‘viewpoint’ is expressed in the Bible, which is – as noted prior – God’s message to humanity.

More compassionate? To whom? Not to mention under what definition of ‘compassion’? I find no compassion in patting someone in error on the head and say comforting words while allowing them to remain in error at the risk of Eternal Death.

So let’s go along with the idea of God introducing Himself into different cultural streams in different ways. Why would introduce Himself in a totally different manner if He’s the same, Eternal God? For instance, in the sub-continent which is now India, why would God decide not to be the Eternal God of Creation of the Jewish people, but instead be represented by a pantheon of conflicting gods which change over time? Why would Almighty God manifest Himself as the volcano god, demanding virgin sacrifices? Would God happily change Himself into the Great Green Arkleseizure of Viltvodle VI?

Is He still God? Is He bored and just experimenting? Can He not remember who He is, from epoch to epoch?

The idea appeals to the ‘open-minded’ who have no ideas about who God is, or what He should be or do. The concept flies in the face of the ultimate creator of the Universe and all things that exist, who is Eternal and changeless, who is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent. In other words, God.

Again, not just ‘unfundamentalist’, but not very good thinking and doctrinally non Christian.

9. “No one comes to the Father except through me” does not mean that in the afterlife only Christians can get into heaven. It means that Jesus/God decides who does and doesn’t make it in.

From this one is forced to believe Jesus will not judge between those who accept Him and those who don’t, but instead will judge by ad hoc rules of ‘good behavior’. I say ‘ad hoc’ because no such rules are outlined in the Bible.

All that stuff about believing in the Son and relying on Him in tenet 1 are out the window, then? It is good deeds that really make the difference?

This heresy is remarkably old as well. It predates Christianity, in fact.

Jesus mentioned this concept in Matthew Seven, starting with verse 15:
15 “Watch out for false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are voracious wolves. 16 You will recognize them by their fruit. Grapes are not gathered from thorns or figs from thistles, are they? 17 In the same way, every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree is not able to bear bad fruit, nor a bad tree to bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 So then, you will recognize them by their fruit.
21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of heaven – only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. 22 On that day, many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, didn’t we prophesy in your name, and in your name cast out demons and do many powerful deeds?’ 23 Then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you. Go away from me, you lawbreakers!’
24 “Everyone who hears these words of mine and does them is like a wise man who built his house on rock. 25 The rain fell, the flood came, and the winds beat against that house, but it did not collapse because it had been founded on rock. 26 Everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. 27 The rain fell, the flood came, and the winds beat against that house, and it collapsed; it was utterly destroyed!”
So then, what about “… the one who does the will of my Father in heaven…”? John 15, starting with verse nine makes it clear:
9 “Just as the Father has loved me, I have also loved you; remain in my love. 10 If you obey my commandments, you will remain in my love, just as I have obeyed my Father’s commandments and remain in his love. 11 I have told you these things so that my joy may be in you, and your joy may be complete.”

Nowhere in the Bible, nowhere in the quotations of Jesus, nowhere in the letters of the various apostles and elders in Jerusalem is any such doctrine mentioned or taught. In one setting (John 10:14-18), Jesus says,
14 “I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me – 15 just as the Father knows me and I know the Father – and I lay down my life for the sheep. 16 I have other sheep that do not come from this sheepfold. I must bring them too, and they will listen to my voice, so that there will be one flock and one shepherd. 17 This is why the Father loves me – because I lay down my life, so that I may take it back again. 18 No one takes it away from me, but I lay it down of my own free will. I have the authority to lay it down, and I have the authority to take it back again. This commandment I received from my Father.”

Verse 16 is often used to ‘prove’ the heresy of various versions of God and or Jesus running about in human history, showing up in various forms and guises. One fellow seriously suggested it could indicate the existence of extra-terrestrial life. Actually, the statement simply indicates non-Jewish people were included. That’s all.

I personally don’t have any problem with extra-terrestrial life, or any of them being in Heaven. But it will be on the basis of an individual relationship with Jesus Christ.

I am also firmly convinced all the inhabitants of planet Earth will have adequate notice of the person and Deity of Jesus Christ. God is not the sort of being who looks for tiny excuses and ‘foot-faults’ to disqualify anyone from Heaven.

10. The question of whether or not hell is real is properly subsumed by the truth that a moment spent worrying if you’ll be with God in the afterlife is an opportunity missed to be with God in this life.

I agree. There is no point of wondering, let alone worrying, if Hell is real. Jesus talks about it too much to be in doubt. It isn’t pleasant, but it’s there. One is obliged to take note and do something to avoid residence.

11. God’s will and intention is to forgive and teach us, not to judge and punish us.

That is true, but only to a qualified extent. Jesus came to Earth as a mortal man to tell us what to do to avoid Eternal punishment and die in our place to pay the price for our sin. Obviously, God the Father was in on this plan as was the Holy Spirit.

God really does not want anyone to spend Eternity in Hell. However, since all mankind is in the default position of being in rebellion against God, mankind is by default condemned to Eternal Hell.

The words of Jesus in John, chapter three:
16 For this is the way God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world should be saved through him. 18 The one who believes in him is not condemned. The one who does not believe has been condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the one and only Son of God. 19 Now this is the basis for judging: that the light has come into the world and people loved the darkness rather than the light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For everyone who does evil deeds hates the light and does not come to the light, so that their deeds will not be exposed. 21 But the one who practices the truth comes to the light, so that it may be plainly evident that his deeds have been done in God.
God is loving and concerned. God is simultaneously honest and just. God is God and that means – in a long list of other things – He will always conduct Himself as God and be true to His own nature.

There are also a number of references warning that when Jesus returns – ‘The Second Coming’ – He will in fact judge all people according to their alliances.

12. The only person who should be actively endeavoring to convert non-Christians into Christians is God. Jesus does not need our help drawing people towards him. He does need, or could certainly use, our help in making sure that people know that they are, just as they are, loved.

This statement directly contradicts the command of Jesus.

Matthew 28:16-20
16 So the eleven disciples went to Galilee to the mountain Jesus had designated. 17 When they saw him, they worshiped him, but some doubted. 18 Then Jesus came up and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And remember, I am with you always, to the end of the age

Acts 1
6 So when they had gathered together, they began to ask him, “Lord, is this the time when you are restoring the kingdom to Israel?” 7 He told them, “You are not permitted to know the times or periods that the Father has set by his own authority. 8 But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the farthest parts of the earth.” 9 After he had said this, while they were watching, he was lifted up and a cloud hid him from their sight.

First Peter 3
15 But set Christ apart as Lord in your hearts and always be ready to give an answer to anyone who asks about the hope you possess. (“Hope” here meaning the expectation of Eternal life with God.)

So in this statement again, the concept is not ‘un-fundamentalist’ but ‘un-Christian’.

13. Getting a divorce is painful, and if at all possible should certainly be avoided. But ultimately the act in and of itself is not immoral.

This statement flatly contradicts Jesus’ teaching on the subject.

Matthew 5
31 “It was said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife must give her a legal document.’ 32 But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Matthew 19
3 Then some Pharisees came to him in order to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful to divorce a wife for any cause?” 4 He answered, “Have you not read that from the beginning the Creator made them male and female, 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and will be united with his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” 7 They said to him, “Why then did Moses command us to give a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her?” 8 Jesus said to them, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because of your hard hearts, but from the beginning it was not this way. 9 Now I say to you that whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another commits adultery.” 10 The disciples said to him, “If this is the case of a husband with a wife, it is better not to marry!”11 He said to them, “Not everyone can accept this statement, except those to whom it has been given. 12 For there are some eunuchs who were that way from birth, and some who were made eunuchs by others, and some who became eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who is able to accept this should accept it.”

So yes, Jesus said divorce is an immoral act, save for the cause of adultery. Even then, the divorced man or woman is limited in options.

14. God does not want any woman “submitting” to anyone.

Another direct contradiction of Biblical teaching.

Ephesians 5
22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord, 23 because the husband is the head of the wife as also Christ is the head of the church – he himself being the savior of the body. 24 But as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. 25 Husbands, love your wives just as Christ loved the church and gave himself for her 26 to sanctify her by cleansing her with the washing of the water by the word, 27 so that he may present the church to himself as glorious – not having a stain or wrinkle, or any such blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In the same way husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.

Colossians 3
18 Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. 19 Husbands, love your wives and do not be embittered against them.

Oh, wait! That’s that questionable Paul again! Since Paul is so very questionable, we can ignore much of his writings – especially the parts about moral conduct, sexual misconduct and general carryings-on.

First Peter 3
1 In the same way, wives, be subject to your own husbands. Then, even if some are disobedient to the word, they will be won over without a word by the way you live, 2 when they see your pure and reverent conduct… like Sarah who obeyed Abraham, calling him lord. You become her children when you do what is good and have no fear in doing so. 7 Husbands, in the same way, treat your wives with consideration as the weaker partners and show them honor as fellow heirs of the grace of life. In this way nothing will hinder your prayers.

That’s the summation of Peter the Apostle. He agrees with Paul the suspect.

15. There were no dinosaurs on Noah’s ark; Jesus didn’t have a pet stegosaurus. An all-powerful God and the theory of evolution are not incompatible.

Whooop! Whooop! Whooop! Strawman Alert!
So, just where do we find claims of dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark? Which gospel contains the story of Jesus and His pet stegosaurus? What kind of hairball ploy is this?

Okay, “An all-powerful God and the theory of evolution are not incompatible.” That part is reasonable enough. However, this isn’t a matter of doctrinal distinction; it’s a matter of textual examination.

Dinosaurs on the Ark? Sheesh.

16. The single most telling indicator of a person’s moral character has nothing to do with how they define or worship God, and everything to do with how they treat others.

So, a relationship with God isn’t important; what is important is ‘good deeds’.

Actually, this is a deceptive argument; somewhat strawman in nature. I’ll agree one’s ‘moral character’ is not always dependent on how one defines or worships God. However, one’s moral character has nothing to do with one’s Eternal estate, being in a proper relationship with God and spending Eternity with God in Heaven.

One can be a rotten skunk and be bound for Heaven, or a very decent, clean, honest and honorable person going to Hell.

I know for a fact that my moral character was – for that matter ‘is’ – not always as good and shining as it ought to be. After becoming a Christian, I have sinned grievously, often and cheerfully. But my eternal destination is already secure and in Jesus’ care. As far as God is concerned in Judgment, I am as pure as Jesus.

Which is not to say I’m content in my life that way, or at peace with God. I found I was a jittery, angry, depressed, unsettled maniac; at least some combination of two or three of those. I can hide it well, but it’s there and I am very aware of it.

What happens is this: God works on me to make me into who – the type of person – He wants me to be, fit for Heaven in Eternity.

To conclude:

“Un-fundamentalists” accept the Deity, Sacrifice, Resurrection and Redemptive nature and power of Jesus Christ. However, they also believe God has appeared in other forms and guises, seemingly revealing other versions of Himself. So Jesus really isn’t uniquely God at all.

“Un-fundamentalists” deny the Divinely Inspired nature of the Bible, strip Paul’s writing of authority and accept homosexual misconduct – and by inference, heterosexual misconduct – as both normal and moral.

“Un-fundamentalists” claim the goal of Christianity is to live a good life; ‘good’ being defined by not offending anyone, getting along with all and ignoring Biblical principles if adherence would cause a row.

“Un-fundamentalists” believe Christians should not vote in accordance with Biblical principles. Nor should laws follow the long held traditions of either Judaism or Christianity.

“Un-fundamentalists” do not assume responsibility for evangelism; in fact, evangelism is discouraged.

“Un-fundamentalists” believe God never criticizes or judges human conduct. They believe there is no Hell. After all, God isn’t going to punish anyone for anything anyway.

All things considered, “Un-fundamentalist Christian” is not a properly descriptive phrase. Citing the serious theological and doctrinal differences between this cult and mainstream Christianity, I would suggest perhaps “Nearly Christian” would be a better description. Since the first tenet does recognize Jesus as God, perhaps “Barely Christian” would do.

Now, I know some bright soul is going to jump on me with the Biblical injunction of “Judge not, lest ye be judged”. The statement comes in Matthew 7, starting with the beginning of the chapter. The whole paragraph reads as follows:

1 “Do not judge so that you will not be judged. 2 For by the standard you judge you will be judged, and the measure you use will be the measure you receive. 3 Why do you see the speck in your brother’s eye, but fail to see the beam of wood in your own? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye,’ while there is a beam in your own? 5 You hypocrite! First remove the beam from your own eye, and then you can see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye. 6 Do not give what is holy to dogs or throw your pearls before pigs; otherwise they will trample them under their feet and turn around and tear you to pieces.

This whole speech is addressed at being judgmental of other people in regard to their fitness or standing before God. I am not ‘judging’ any person, but a set of beliefs and how they measure up to Christianity, I am not violating any injunction. Indeed, I am following a warning given by John the Revelator in First John 4:

1 Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to determine if they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses Jesus as the Christ who has come in the flesh is from God, 3 but every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God, and this is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming, and now is already in the world.

So I am testing this ‘spirit’, this claim of revelation of God. I find interesting that tenet 1 claims to recognize Jesus as the Son of God in the Flesh, and then denies Jesus’ Deity in most of the subsequent tenets.

Unknown writer & Elizabeth Johnston #fundie mommyunderground.com

The Latest LGBT TV Show Is So Outrageous It Will Leave Your Head Spinning

The LGBT community has hijacked the entertainment industry and filled the airwaves with their warped agenda.

From homosexual marriage, to “transgender” couples, it’s no wonder more and more Americans are saying “no thanks” to cable TV.

But this latest show introduces a character that takes it even further.

In fact, as this show reveals there’s no telling just how far the LGBT community will go to shock America and attempt to make their way of life “mainstream.”

Instead of introducing a transsexual, or another homosexual couple, Showtime decided to introduce its first gender “non-binary” character.

The LGBT community deems a “non-binary” person as one who doesn’t identify with either gender.

Determined to strip away any sense of decency, Showtime pushes the envelope and introduces this bizarre character to the world.

CBN reported:

“Dillon uses singular they pronouns and her role on the show is the first gender non-binary character on American television.

The move is seen as a huge step forward for LGBTQ inclusion and representation in pop culture.

But Elizabeth Johnston, also known as the ‘Activist Mommy’, says Showtime’s decision to cast a non-binary character is all part of the LGBTQ’s plan to normalize it.

“This is an LGBT agenda that is being pushed on our nation,” Johnston said in an interview with CBN News. “Truth and science and facts matter and just because someone says that two plus one equals five that doesn’t make it true.

There’s something called facts and truth and the truth of it is we are born xy or xx or we have a biological or psychological pathology and what we’re seeing with gender dysphoria is pathological and it is not normal and we’re being asked to embrace it as normal and celebrate it.”

Elizabeth Johnston nailed it.

Just because the LGBT community refuses to “see gender”, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

People with gender dysphoria need help, mental counseling, not exposure to the world to promote their way of life, which will further confuse those who already struggle.

The biggest lie of all is the LGBT community wants to “live a quiet life in peace.”

Nothing could be further from the truth.

As Mommy Underground previously reported, they have a record of sneaking their perverted agenda into shows that target children.

But while the LGBT community thinks they have power, they’re forgetting one thing – if people decide to boycott these shows and refuse to watch them, it will help stop the spread of their twisted agenda.

After all, networks are ultimately about ratings.

If conservatives can show network officials they will no longer pay nor subscribe to such filth, perhaps things can change.

And if not, parents must refuse to let their children watch these shows.

What are your thoughts on the new “non-binary” character?

How do you prevent your family from watching shows like these?

Tell us your thoughts in the comments below.

And to stay current on the latest Mommy Underground stories, follow us on Facebook and be sure to like and share our posts!

Pomidor Quixote #sexist dailystormer.name

Mothers Furious After Watching Rape Porn Make a Porn Film to Show to Their Kids

Some mothers will make their own porn films to educate their kids about what sex is really about.

This isn’t even peak degeneracy yet.

Daily Mail:

A group of five mothers are making a porn film they would be happy to show their children after being disgusted by watched X-rated videos online.

One mother was so horrified by online porn that she threw up and one was so traumatised that she quit the whole process.

Sarah, 40, from North Wales, cried while watching rape-based content during the mothers’ research portion of the show.

According to The Mirror, she said: ‘If that was the first time I’d seen anything about sex I’d be petrified. I just thought all of a sudden that I was going to throw up.

‘We need to show kids that there’s something else than this horrible sh*t we see on the internet.

‘If my son treated a woman like that I would kick his a*** to kingdom come.

She added: ‘Porn doesn’t represent normal women, the actors and actresses they use mislead kids. They need to realise it’s not normal.’

The mothers are making their own porn film as part of a Channel 4 TV show called Mums Make Porn.

The three-part series will see a group of mothers create a film with sex in it that they would be happy to let their children watch.

Their mission was to create a porn film which promoted positive attitudes towards sex and realistic expectations of what it involves.

They worked with industry experts and were given all the tools they would need to make the film.

At the end of the series, the mothers reveal their X-rated film to their friends and family, including their children.

That’s right, kids. Mommy will teach you how to fuck women now.

How about not letting kids watch porn instead?

They’ll likely say that that’s just not realistic, but if that’s the case, how can making them watch more porn — even if homemade — be the solution?

Because this isn’t even about porn. It’s about women policing men’s sexuality.

One of the mothers literally said “If my son treated a woman like that I would kick his arse to kingdom come” and that is the perfect synthesis of what all of this depravity is really about; women not approving of how men experience their sexuality.

Old story, really.

Don’t let front-holes tell you how to fuck. You are the one doing the fucking. These bitches do nothing but lay there anyway, so what say should they have in the activity?

If they don’t like it, they can go get themselves fucked and beheaded by niggers.

Besides, women really enjoy when you’re not concerned about their enjoyment of sex. They actually want you to take control over their bodies for your own pleasure, without worrying about their pleasure.

It’s all just a gargantuan shit-test.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

Global Warming?
The notion that Greenland, which is reportedly 2,166,086 sq km (836,109 sq mi), is mostly covered by ice and snow is not only illogical but scientifically impossible. Nevertheless, 81% of it is allegedly covered by the mythical Greenland ice sheet which is reportedly 1,755,637 sq km (677,855 sq mi) in size. The notion of this ice sheet is even more implausible if the numerous maps depicting Greenland to be twice or three times large are indeed true. The very notion that a single climate spans thousands of miles without changing is not only contrary to everything known about climatology and meteorology, but is not replicated elsewhere on Earth, making the likelihood of it being true all the less likely. A great example of the diversity of the world’s weather is found in Southern California which has a Mediterranean climate in San Diego, a mountainous snow climate surrounding Big Bear and Snow Summit, and a desert climate in Death Valley which holds the record for the highest temperature ever recorded on Earth. All three of these respective microclimates occur within an area that’s roughly 258.99881 sq km (100 sq mi). Because Greenland admittedly has mountains, valley, rivers and weather systems, a congruent and stagnant sheet of ice year round is not scientifically possible. In respect to the argument that Greenland is near the North Pole (which does not exist) and thus experiences colder weather, there are a few scientific facts which have conveniently been left out of the equation. Firstly, it is a well-known fact that hot air rises. Therefore, Greenland and the North Pole should, in theory, be the warmest place on Earth when using the accepted basketball-like model of Earth. Secondly, since Greenland and the North Pole sit atop the Earth, they should receive more sunlight than anywhere else on Earth, destroying any notion of polar ice caps. Sunlight translates to heat, regardless of where it is found. Lastly, considering that Greenland was named Greenland because it was once green, the argument that its location atop the Earth is somehow responsible for its ice age-like climate is ultimately null and void.

Global Warming Hoax
The concepts of “global warming” and “climate change” were originally designed by the Roman Empire in Greenland in order to deceive the world into thinking that the Greenland ice sheet along with the polar ice caps are melting or at risk of melting. Never mind the fact that the Artic, Antarctica, the North Pole and the South Pole do not even exist in reality. In short, “global warming” and “climate change” are part of a worldwide psychological operation (PSYOP) designed to frame an argument over whether or not the Earth is warming rather than over whether or not the Greenland ice sheets and the polar ice caps even exist. By stating that the Earth is simultaneously warming and cooling (see below), humanity is collectively stuck debating a fake issue, both sides of which are fraudulent in nature. Needless to say, this massive lie has been perpetuated with the goal of confuse humanity about the true nature of the world’s weather, especially in respect to Greenland. Considering that all of the Earth is warm (at least during the summer), the term "global warming" is essentially true, albeit in a de facto manner.

Hollywood Ice Age Propaganda
Aside from the film "An Inconvenient Truth" (2006), the infamous global warming documentary spearheaded by Al Gore, Hollywood has been busy selling the notion of a previously icy planet, especially to our children. "Ice Age" (2002) is a film (see trailer) consisting of computer-animated cartoon-like animal characters that was nominated at the 75th Academy Awards for best animated feature. Set in the alleged ice age, the film stars Ray Romano, John Leguizamo, and Denis Leary. To date, the film franchise has three sequels: “Ice Age: The Meltdown” (2006), “Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs” (2009), “Ice Age: Continental Drift” (2012), and “Ice Age 5” (2016). Needless to say, Hollywood movie propaganda has sold the idea to hundreds of millions of children that an ice age actually existed, making the notion of polar ice caps and the Greenland ice sheet all the more believable.

fracturedInfinity #fundie rr-bb.com

I agree. It's not the anime specifically, but the distraction caused by it. It's a preference thing. Personally, I think the internet is the common factor. For one who is really into anime, the internet is a great place to get at some of the more obscure titles. We, because of Satan, are a common target amongst atheists on the internet.

So, you could say that Atheists + anime + internet = RR trolls. Of course that's a sweeping generalization that isn't going to be true 100% of the time, but it seems a logical explaination in my mind anyway.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Internet porn is a conspiracy to drain men's natural sexual energy

Porn was always available, but it was never so widespread and so compulsive to look at. Now there are thousands of videos available at the click of a mouse.

The more you watch porn, the more you will drain your natural God-given sexual energy. Then, when you meet real women you won't be motivated to pursue them. You may even have trouble getting erections, depending on how old you are.

You may also develop anxiety and depression and generally have less motivation to do anything in life. This happens slowly over time, over many years, so you may not notice until it's too late.

Once you're thoroughly addicted, you won't know how to be happy without porn. You'll be trapped inside a Hellish Internet fantasy world. Porn is living death.

ggthxnore #sexist reddit.com

[Part of a conversation on KotakuInAction about a quote from Sonic Boom, where Knuckles says that always making big deal about feminism whenever a woman accomplishes something undermines equality by making the act seem like an exception rather than the status quo, using soccer as an example. This started a debate on if this constitutes Knuckles being used as a vehicle for feminist propaganda or him being anti-feminist.]

Sickening, but I suppose it's pretty par for the course. People have been pushing their political agendas in cartoons for as long as I can remember. The cartoons I grew up with were always tokens 'r' us when it was human characters. Had to have the black one, the chick one, the wheelchair one, etc. Had to make them look good, too, so there'd be a dumb/aggressive white guy for them to correct/restrain. Then you had the ham-fisted moral/PSA at the end where you learn not to judge a book by its cover and why you shouldn't play with downed power lines, because knowing is half the battle.

It felt so much more benign when the propaganda was just Captain Planet and the morals were stuff like sharing is caring. Now it's going to be fucking wage gap myths and Tumblr genders. The kids never did anything to deserve this shit.

[...]

What Knuckles says may be accurate, but he shouldn't be saying it. Feminist proselytizing in a children's cartoon is despicable. You can argue that it's that mythical "good feminism" that stops at "men and women should be treated equally" since what he's saying isn't insane, but I would argue that "good feminism" wouldn't be proudly circlejerking about their propaganda on Twitter. Secondly feminism in that sense is essentially a meaningless term because almost everyone in the Western world is a feminist. It's like having a label for people who believe the earth is round. Aside from incels and maybe some weird NRx types no one believes or argues for the contrary position that women should not be treated equally except trolls looking to get a reaction. Even TRPers who conceptualize women as essentially slightly retarded children aren't looking to subjugate them or strip them of any of their rights, they just want to fuck the pretty ones and impress each other with their half-assed evopsych observational comedy.

If there were pushing BLM in a cartoon, would you be like "what, you don't think black lives matter?" if I objected?

MelloStein #conspiracy narutobase.net

I just HAD to make an account to agree that both Naruto and Naruto Shippuden (most anime) contain Illuminati/Freemasonic symbolism. I use the terms Illuminati/Freemason in reference to those who control our world, for they have no name.

I've watched a great deal of anime and the single eye (AKA the Eye of Horus/Ra, which represents the Illuminati watching over all) was present during them all, as well as other occult symbolism with hidden meanings.

It's funny how people completely disregard the conveniently placed 'tomoe' as nothing but abstract shapes because of a Wikipedia entry on their origin. This proves very little as the Illuminati usually have well-thought-out excuses for including their subliminal messaging so when they get caught plastering 6's all over your favourite anime character they can say "You're paranoid. That isn't six sixes, it's six tomoe aligned side by side to look like a magatama. Section this insane conspiracy theorist!" These people are highly intelligent. Blatant Satanic propaganda without a cover story isn't their style.

I mean, think about what I'm implying here. These Devil-worshipping psychopaths have infiltrated governments worldwide, mainstream media etc. They didn't reach these positions of power they're in now by making mistakes and getting caught.

Now, I'm not saying Kishimoto is a Satanist (although it is a possibility) but that doesn't mean he wasn't paid/pressured into including a few Satanic symbols into his works. I'm sure he'd much rather cooperate with the higher-ups than turn against them and face the consequences.

Conclusion:
A 'tomoe' looks strikingly similar to the number six, a fact that can be taken advantage of.

The words 'Japanese mythology' are a great method of explaining away any questionable material in your anime series. (See: this thread)

Pyramids were around before this nameless secret society, of course. The group have merely adopted the pyramid shape/symbol as their own.

The majority of human beings ITT are ignorant/brainwashed. Do your research before attempting to reply to this comment.

Namaste.

Lady Gaga, Jay Z and Kanye West are all either Illuminati members/pawns. Also Kony2012 was government funded pro-war propaganda, promoted by celebrities to gain support for the invasion of the resource-rich Uganda.

Matthew Stucky #fundie matthewstucky.blogspot.com

Let's go back to the story from the animated movie with Rudolph. Rudolph gets shy around girls & his nose turns red. As a result, the other reindeer won't let him play any reindeer games. That sounds sick, perverted & homosexual. Basically Rudolph like girls because he is straight & as a result they don't let him participate in their homosexual games.

People are going to read this & say I'm crazy but hasn't Hollywood always been trying to pump in homosexual themes into kids movies & cartoons. One of the teletubbies is gay. Bert & Ernie are gay. In Scooby Doo Greg is gay. Hollywood has always had agendas they are trying to push and one of those major agendas is homosexuality is ok. It's no big deal. Another one they are trying to push is "It's ok for women to work."

The truth is Santa Clause is being used by Satan to corrupt kids at a very young age.

The Learner #fundie rr-bb.com

[Thread title: Forecast: Sex and Marriage With Robots by 2050]

I can totally see this happening.

Since the "sexual revolution" our society has distorted what sex is by design into the quest for personal gratification. This is why we see so may gays, lesbians, bi sexuals, tri sexuals etc. This is why internet porn is so huge, it is all about personal gratification.

Now add that to this.

Women do not need to rely on men to support them, and men have a harder and harder time finding women who want to be wives in the traditional sense. And when men do get married then they find that it is not what they expected it to be, or something else goes wrong and the man finds himself in divorce court. In divorce court the man loses half of his stuff, has to pay support/alimony etc. just like it was still 1950.

So if sex is all about personal gratification, and marriage is just a huge (often sexless) headache. Then the secular viewpoint will be that you would have to be nuts to get married. So sex robots would be the ideal set up for a man who doesn't truly know what God's plan of marriage is.

Cablinasian Coward #racist robertlindsay.wordpress.com

Robert, we bash Asians because we see them as foreign undesirables.

Asians, specifically Asian males, are socially awkward, and do not fit in with the rest of us. They cannot culturally assimilate, and they are invasive, by taking over America’s best jobs. They are physically different from the rest of us, with huge heads and tiny dicks. They are not able to have fun, get drunk, and crash parties like we are. They instead prefer to spend most of their time studying, which explains their higher IQ. They are also racist and view everyone as inferior. They troll endlessly on the Internet trying to push an Asian supremacy agenda. They are worse than Internet Hindus.

They lie, steal, and cheat their way to success. Ever seen the movie “Rising Sun”? This is a great movie that shows how Japanese buisnessman backstab their way up the totem pole. This movie clearly shows that Asians are worse than Jews.

Carleston Coon, an Anthropologist on race, wrote a lot about Asians. I actually have a lot of Coon’s books at my dad’s house. In one of the books, Coon says that the slanted eyes of Asians is a biological indicator of how Asians are predisposed to trickery and deceit.

The movie Red Dawn came out in early 2013. You saw how heartless Asians could be in that movie. The movie also showed America how cowardly those Asian soldiers were. Look at the White and Black American freedom fighters in Red Dawn. They acted courageously and honestly. Then look at the Asians. One of them heartlessly shot a White man to death for speaking his mind.

Notice how the North Koreans in Red Dawn needed help from the Russians to invade America. This clearly proves that Asians are stale and uncreative, always requiring assisstance from White people.

I am not trying to be racist, but Asians don’t belong in America.

Power Point Paradise #fundie powerpointparadise.com

HOW MS MEDIA RIDICULE DRAGONS

ANIMAL PLANET "MYTHIFIED& DEBUNKED" DRAGONS and OUR STATS WENT DOWN!
MAIN STREAM MEDIA BRAINWASHING MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! THE LEMMINGS FALL IN LINE!
They don't want people to research these things, because The-Powers_That-Be pushed Evolution on us to destroy Western Civilisation! Their scientific figureheads took the money to lie &over up the truth &now their academic following all believe we "CAME FROM A ROCK!"

WITH HOAXES!
(EXCERPT ARTICLE FROM THE TELEGRAPH JAN 2004)

"A pickled dragon that looks as if it might once have flown around Hogwarts has been found in a garage in Oxfordshire. Yesterday the baby dragon, in a sealed 30in jar, was in the office of Allistair Mitchell, who runs a marketing company in Oxford. He was asked to investigate by his friend, David Hart, from Sutton Courtenay, who discovered it. A metal tin found with the dragon contained paperwork in old-fashioned German of the 1890s."

"All they had to do in this case, which turned out to be another debunking hoax, to find out whether it was real or not, like alternative news www.rense.com noted: "A one minute X-ray will answer the question instantly. lf there is NO X-ray taken, we have a cover up. In all likelihood, an X-ray analysis has already been done..." --Editor Rense.com"

Well, it turned out it was a hoax by a Media company and a Media prop-making company. The Smithsonian Institute is actually rumored to possess real dragon remains. Many real proofs & artifacts are lying around locked up in vaults somewhere, and some were actually destroyed by Evolutionary hijackers of Science!

And how many genuine sightings have been denied and shoved from the frontpages of the hijacked media. They should throw open the Smithonian Institute and archives of ALL "Natural" History museums everywhere, to bring to light hidden proofs that Dragons were & are still ALIVE today and aren't"Dinosaurs!"

WELL, ENJOY THE PICS.
HOPE YOU HAVE A NICE PARADIGM SHIFT!
LET'S START WITH SOME HISTORY:

[...]

BRITAIN now called WALES

The early Britons, from whom the modern Welsh are descended, provide us with our earliest surviving European accounts of reptilian monsters, one of whom killed and devoured king Morvidus (Morydd) in about 336 BC. We are told in the original early Welsh account (which Geoffrey of Monmouth translated into Latin and which still survives in spite of modernist claims to the contrary 4) that the monster "gulped down the body of Morvidus as a big fish swallows a little one." Geoffrey wrote of the monster under its Latin name, Belua.
Morvidus, by the way, was a merciless cruel tyrant. So he seemed to reap what he dished out.

OF COURSE DARWINIST/CULTURAL MARXIST GATEKEEPER WIKIPEDIA CALLS KING MORVIDUS MYTHICAL! HA!
WHAT ELSE WOULD YOU EXPECT...

Peredur, not the ancient king of that name (306 - 296 BC), but a much later son of Earl Efrawg, had better luck than Morvidus, actually managing to slay his monster, an addanc (pronounced athanc: variant afanc,) at a place called Llyn Llion in Wales.
At other Welsh locations the addanc is further spoken of along with another reptilian species known as the carrog. The addanc survived until comparatively recent times at such places as Bedd-yr-Afanc near Brynberian, at Llyn-yr-Afanc above Bettws-y-Coed on the River Conwy (the killing of this monster was described in the year 1693), and Llyn Barfog. A carrog is commemorated at Carrog near Corwen, and at Dol-y-Carrog in the Vale of Conwy.

SWEDEN

Lindorm, Lindworm
(Swedish for Dragon)

A 19th century Scandinavian creature rumored to be a "mythical" dragon-like beast was often seen in the country around marshes, caves, and large bodies of water. There have been 40 plus eyewitness accounts of this creature.

Reports have the Lindorm being 10-20 feet long, with a body as thick as a man's thigh, black with yellow-flamed belly, a mouth full of white shining sharp teeth, large saucer like eyes, and an unwieldy body. It behaves like a snake when cornered. It will rear up on it's tail in a strike or pounce stance, behave in an aggressive and powerful manner and is also very ill tempered. It is difficult to destroy and when successfully killed will emit a foul smelling odor when in its final death throes.

Lindorms remain on land until too large to move about easily then it takes to the water where it again begins to grow. Although there are many witnesses, there has been no physical evidence of the existence of Lindorms, which has led some to believe in "collective hallucinations." However, due to the high number of first hand accounts, not to mention the absurdity of collective or group hallucinations, it is more likely to have been a very live creature at one time and perhaps still! It does not seem likely that 40 plus people could describe the same creature unless they have actually seen it!

In legend, the german hero Siegfried conquered a lindwyrm that lived near the town of Worms in Germany.

NORWAY, DANMARK

And why did the Norsmen or Vikings get the idea to put Dragon heads on their boats? Because they had never seen them pop out of the water and scare them half to death? Or just because of that, so they could scare the marine dragons with it.

DRAGONS in FRANCE?

THE TARASQUE OF NERLUC

The city of Nerluc in France was renamed Tarascon in honor of the killing of a dragon there, called the Tarasque. This animal was bigger than an ox and had long, sharp, pointed horns on its head. There were a number of different horned dinosaurs, like the Triceratops.
[Info & image: "The Great Dinosaur Mystery" by Paul Taylor]

Here is an old postcard from the city with the spiked beast.

image

THE LEGEND

The Tarasque haunted the banks of the River Rhone in Nerluc. It had six limbs and was spawned by the serpent Leviathan, but in time it came to haunt Southern France. A traveller named Jacques du Bois was journeying along the banks of that river one evening, and he was so focused on the terrifying rumours he had heard of the Tarasque that he failed to hear a deep rumble. Suddenly the Tarasque appeared and with a deafening roar, it ignited the luckless du Bois with a steady stream of fire.

[...]

Does Darwin dare to make
Marco Polo out a LIAR???

image
image

MESOPOTAMIAN DRAGONS
BABYLON

THE 'SIRRUSH'

In 600 B.C., an artist carved 3 animals in the archway of the Ishtar Gate in Babylon.
The three animals were a lion, a wild ox & the Sirrush.
Why was this supposedly mythical creature pictured with two known animals? Was it because it wasn't a myth? The sirrush was described as slender bodied, scale covered creature with a horn atop it's head. Nebuchadnezzar was the king of Babylonia at the time and the Bible mentions that his priests kept a great dragon or serpent that they worshipped.
The creature closely resembles a type of dinosaur, a sauropod. Since the Babylonians did not have the ability to reconstruct fossil remains it is more likely they were drawing a living animal that they had seen. The drawings and carvings of the sirrush were always the same and never varies which normally indicates they were based on a real creature. [Text courtesy Shadowlands]

THEY ALSO MADE A SCULPTURE OF THE BEAST Caption above - "The head of a dragon, the symbol of Marduk, sculpted in bronze and dating from c. 300-600 B.C., was found in Mesopotamia and is now in the Louvre Museum, Paris" - - Image from "Dragons: A Natural History" by Dr. Karl Shuker.

[...]

CENTRAL AMERICA

DRAGONS IN PERU

ICA or ICCA STONES

The simple farmer who originally found and tried to sell them, was "impressed" by authorities, to confess that he had made all those hundreds of stones by himself, or else....

The stones show clear dinosaurs interacting with humans. And for Darwinist controlled Archaeology departments all around the world, that is a No No, of course.

Phil Elmore #fundie wnd.com

The latest deviancy they're trying to mainstream

Exclusive: Phil Elmore sees 'furry' perversion as next crack in society's foundation

Emily Gaudette, writing for Inverse, said it best early last month: “When Disney released an explanatory teaser for 2016’s ‘Zootopia,’ one could almost hear the sound of a billion DeviantArt accounts whirring to life. … The film’s teaser alone reads like an explanation of the furry manifesto: that anthropomorphized animals can be sexualized and identified with as easily as humans. … Could it be a coincidence that Disney chose a fox protagonist for its first fully anthro feature, considering foxes are arguably the most popular ‘fursona’ cited by furries? Many furries name the hero of Disney’s animated Robin Hood, also a fox, when recalling their first sexual feelings for anthropomorphized animals.”

Wait, what? Yes, you read that correctly: Disney’s new film, “Zootopia,” is arguably an attempt to mainstream “furry” sexuality – the practice of dressing up in fuzzy animal mascot costumes in order to engage in one’s perverted, prurient practices. This column has profiled the intersection between “furry” perversion and left-wing politics before. Already, the “otherkin” movement, in which various losers redefine themselves in terms of the animals and fantasy characters with which they “identify,” are posting lists of their preferred pronouns on their self-absorbed blogs. That’s where it starts. The more society in general becomes aware of this movement, the more it will creep into the mainstream of popular culture. Once lodged there, it will be impossible to root out, and society will be that much weaker for it.

When the debate over Obamacare produced the “Pajama Boy” meme, right-thinking people reacted in horror at the emasculation this imagery represented. It juvenilized young adults in a way that any real grownup would find repugnant. That is, after all, what the push toward societal acceptance – be it for furries, “otherkin,” “bronies,” transgenders, or some other sexually delusional perversion – is all about. If masculinity is the fuel on which society runs, on which innovation occurs, on which industries are built and on which wars are fought to protect a free people, then feminism, liberalism, furries, bronies, transgenders and the Star Wars cantina of progressive freaks with body image issues and self-esteem deficits is the sugar in society’s gas tank. Progressives hate themselves, so they invent new sexual personas and new deviancies to keep themselves entertained. Liberals hate families and decency, so they champion sexual perversion and child molestation while holding it up as viable “other” sexuality. Can there really be any doubt that the majority of “furries” are likely pedophiles?

As social media is used to promulgate countless delusional, perverted indulgences, society suffers. By embracing “furries” and other perverts, we are producing a population of incapable, weak-minded children. As our culture sags under the weight of these useless Pajama Boys and Pajama Girls, it is no wonder, then, that our foundations are beginning to show serious cracks. The mainstreaming of “furries” is the furthering of liberal destruction of society. It presages the extinction of the rational, responsible adults who once formed the backbone of our nation. This destruction started on social media, and it is there that this battle was, is and will be fought.

TrappedInMensBodies #transphobia reddit.com

Incels- actual incels, not people who want an excuse for not making the effort- hate these kinds of people. If you're too ugly to pass as a man you're not going to find more success as a- in their eyes- delusional woman.

And if it's because you're just looking for an acceptable way to express your own homosexuality- it's more common than you may expect- incels still hate it because homosexual men tend to be extremely promiscuous, have many sexual partners, and tend to have lower standards than women per statistics.

Guys on TheRedPill and pick up artists hate MGTOW. What does this have to do with the fact that they all hate and degrade women?

Any outside observer can see what this is. Incels and this new wave of TIMs who discovered their identity through Internet forums, porn, and anime (I'll just call them 'transbians') are both mediocre pornsick young men who are emotionally incapable of interacting with women. There has been research done which shows that watching porn from a young age causes a disconnect in the male mind.

First of all, their only experience with sex is seeing other people doing it on a screen, so they start to view this normal interaction between men and women as something immaterial and unattainable to them. Young men end up watching porn daily and rarely interacting with women, which puts sex on a pedestal in their minds and it becomes unimaginable that they will ever get to sexually interact with a woman. Incels take this despair out on women in the form of frustration and rampant misogyny, meanwhile Transbians cope with these hopeless desires by pushing them inwards, so being a girl becomes their new unobtainable goal.

Second of all, exposure to porn before natural sexual interests develop naturally leads people to develop their interests around what they see in porn, which is unfortunate because porn viewers tend to rapidly accelerate the intensity of the stuff that they watch as time goes on because the brain needs more and more dopamine forever. My theory is that incels ended up at abuse/rape porn while Transbians ended up at sissy hypno porn.

Any transbian would've been an incel if they took a slightly different path.

Mich #fundie ummah.com

I watch anime and it includes: drawings of men, women, and animals. It is filled with music. Women are always drawn with skimpy cloths and anime will always have at least one episode either at a beach or hot spa so they can draw the women in skimpy bating suits. Do this and putting anime characters into sexual situations is actually named and done purposely... see fan service.

Anime is prompting western dress, western schooling, western ideas, western culture. In recent anime they more than likely either adding a homosexual character in it, and/or homosexual jokes or Homosexual fan service.

So can you tell me why anime would not be haraam?

Truman #conspiracy answers.yahoo.com

Liberals, what do you think about the lgbt agenda being forced onto children?

Drag queens brainwashing kindergarteners into their lifestyle, gay couples molesting their adopted kids & the media covering it up, satanic elite pedophile cults, child sex trafficking, gay & lesbian sex parades where naked perverts hump each other in front of all the kids there, gay propaganda forced on kids in public schools, all these pedophilia cartoons on the internet, evil rich Jews orchestrating the whole thing because the Talmud says it's okay to molest gentile children, Muslims raping kids & liberals still supporting them, satanic Hollywood rampant with child sexual abuse, liberal culture in general sexually perverted in front of children, transexuality being forced onto kids who are too young to even understand sexuality, little boys put in dresses & given hormones, little girls being treated like sex objects in "fashion" shows & "dance" classes run by gays, Disney putting gay scenes in kids movies.

The Illuminati are satanic pedophiles and they control the mainstream culture. They use the gay agenda to destabilize civilization & make the masses into their sex slaves who are too sensual to think, too hedonistic to care, and so perverted that they put their lusts above any greater good.

But what do you think about it being forced onto children like this? I realize liberals are evil & they like to corrupt the innocence of children. So am I a hateful bigot for wanting to protect children from the lgbt pedophile agenda?

Adam Hobbes #fundie reaxxion.com

“The uncontested absurdities of today are the accepted slogans of tomorrow. They come to be accepted by degrees, by precedent, by implication, by erosion, by default, by dint of constant pressure on one side and constant retreat on the other—until the day when they are suddenly declared to be the country’s official ideology.”

-Ayn Rand

The public debut of “Caitlyn” Jenner represents a watershed moment for American culture. Though most have not realized it, Jenner’s coming out party constitutes a significant “trial balloon” on the part of the progressive left and the media. It is an attempt to cash in on years of carefully managed stories on transgender “discrimination,” sympathetic portrayals of transgender characters in entertainment, and the generally successful campaign of the gay rights movement and social justice activists.

The goal is simple: normalize transgenderism to such an extent that any criticism of the concept or its practitioners will not be tolerated.

They must not be allowed to succeed. Whether the silent majority of Americans realize it or not, the transgender issue represents the last best opportunity to turn the tide in the culture wars. Make no mistake: the progressives are winning. Twenty years ago a person could openly criticize homosexuality. Today, thanks to the Supreme Court, people who do not enthusiastically endorse gay marriage are branded as bigots, disqualified from high-profile business positions, and generally dismissed as ignorant hicks whose views are outside of the scope of acceptable thought.

Media outlets have already taken sides and are branding people as being “transphobic” for not accepting the idea that Bruce Jenner is now a female. It is now “bigoted” to refer to Bruce as a “he.” Even so much as joking about Jenner is verboten. The media is rallying around him, protecting him, in spite of the fact that his refusal to get sex reassignment surgery, his sexual preference for women, and his recently having killed someone in a car accident all make him a very poor candidate as the face of transgenderism.

Nevertheless, they have made him the poster boy, hoping that everyday TV watchers won’t sweat the details and that the popularity of the Kardashians will keep him relevant. The next steps include some Will and Grace style sitcom to make transgenders seem more hip and fun, adoption by the Democratic Party as the next great civil rights issue, and finally a sustained campaign of legal and private ideological bullying until transgender acceptance is the new normal.


"The Line In The Sand"

Why must we draw the line at transgenderism? I argue that legitimization of transgenderism would constitute a cultural sea change. It would be the first time the cultural fascists had succeeded in enforcing genuine doublethink. Leftist ideology regarding transgenderism not only contradicts existing progressive doctrines (feminism), but is also literally false. You are being ordered to believe in a fairy tale—the idea that a dog can transform into a cat if it just wishes for it hard enough—and this is where the danger lies.

To be clear, I do not argue that we need to persecute or hate transgenders: people have the right to choose to play dress up and freely associate with others who indulge their delusions. What we need to protect is our right to disapprove of their behavior and reject their “science.” We must dig our heels in and fight. One is reminded of Picard’s words on the Borg in First Contact:

“We’ve made too many compromises already, too many retreats. They invade our space and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds and we fall back. Not again! The line must be drawn here! This far, no farther!”: might as well be GamerGate’s slogan.

Of course, in the film Jean-Luc eventually agrees with Lily, though this does not refute his point about the Borg. He is right when he says that repeated compromise and surrender will not work. As in any war, the longer good men wait to fight back, the more difficult it is to overcome a metastasizing and emboldened evil.

The progressives have been encouraged by traditional Americans’ reluctance to fight back due to a mixture of indifference, moral cowardice, and bemusement. They are strengthened by the tendency of mainstream society to not take them seriously, to say “Who cares about Bruce Jenner and the reality TV sideshow!”, and to think that the goodwill and tolerance extended toward progressives will be returned.

This last point is crucial when we consider the history of previous civil rights causes. Earlier progressive campaigns pertaining to issues such as women’s lib, gay rights, and miscegenation had decent libertarian justifications and did not seek to impose much on society save tolerance of alternative life choices. (Social conservatives would likely argue that there were other negative consequences.)

Transgenderism, by contrast, imposes a great deal on American society. It requires us to revisit all questions of sex segregation, everywhere from schools to sports leagues to bathrooms. And note that this is all demanded based on the softer concept, “gender,” as transgenders have all but stopped using the term “transsexual.” They understand that with current technology, sex is immutable.

Since gender is supposedly just about feelings instead of biology, transgender logic would allow any man to claim he is a woman and waltz into a women’s locker room. There is no requirement that he pass for a female, nor is there a requirement that his “feeling” be permanent.


"The Real Danger"

The biggest problem with the transgender agenda is that it erodes our right to our own minds and to our perceptions of reality. A man is not a woman merely because he believes he is one, yet the progressives would have us believe so on pain of social ostracism, loss of employment, and discrimination lawsuits. If we give progressives the right to redefine reality, then we are no better off than Winston in 1984 when he was tortured for refusing to say that 2 and 2 equal 5 (or to continue the Star Trek references, Picard when he was tortured by the Cardassians for refusing to pretend there were five lights. And isn’t it weird that “Cardassian” sounds like “Kardashian?”)

What argument could there possibly be against polygamy, pedophilia, zoophilia, or any range of (currently) unacceptable behaviors? If the legal criteria for a thing’s identity is mere belief on the part of the subject, why shouldn’t a child be allowed to have a romantic relationship with an adult if he believes himself to be an adult as well?

Children are too young to make that choice you say? Then why are there transgender children? Surely you can’t argue that a small child ought to be able to take hormones and change their gender (a decision that will have a massive impact on the rest of their lives), yet cannot consent to sex. If feelings are good enough in one case, then why not the other?

We are not only legitimizing a subculture that will invite massive legal headache and mischief upon our society, we are also establishing a criteria for said legitimacy that is so patently irrational and dangerous as to ensure an endless queue of additional subcultures will come forward seeking the same affirmation from society.

It is perhaps ironic that it is the traditionalists and conservatives that are arguing that there is more to being a woman than copying stereotypical gender norms and looking the part. To say that Bruce Jenner is a woman after a bit of surgery and makeup is degrading to the idea of womanhood. The case of Rachel Dolezal shows that black people are not especially tolerant of whites identifying as black merely because they “feel” they are. Yet there is no strong argument against transracialism if we accept transgenderism.

Given the example of Dolezal, women should be just as insulted at the pretense of someone like Bruce Jenner. Lacking the biology and differing treatment from society that comes from actually being a woman, his claim that he “has always felt like a woman” is absurd on its face. What he really feels is a compulsive desire to play dress up: to make manifest a fetishized ideal of femininity brought about by his own psychological insecurities and a “grass is always greener” presumption about life as a woman.

Transgender people suffer from a pervasive mental illness, and as a result they deserve our sympathy. There is no reason to be violent or mean toward them. Still, we should not be expected to affirm their neuroses anymore than we should affirm the beliefs of a schizophrenic who believes himself to be an alien.

The time for compromise is over. Do not apologize for “misgendering” them, do not feel bad for calling him “Bruce,” do not be afraid to make jokes about them (they say worse things about whites and Christians), and do not ever apologize for rejecting their unscientific hogwash. This noisy .001% of the population is sick and should not be allowed to dictate to the rest of us. When they tell you to move, plant yourself like a tree by the river of truth and tell them: no. You move.

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Parents plan 'Sex Ed Sit Out' to protest sexualized school curricula and sexualization of children"

(cut-and-pasted from Fox News, link here: http://www.foxnews.com/family/2018/04/12/parents-plan-sex-ed-sit-out-to-protest-sexualized-school-curricula.html)

Buddy:
Public schools have to teach real world issues. If you want to keep your children isolated from the world we live in, then put them in private school. As an educator however, I can say from experience that you are putting your children at a real disadvantage.

Lady Checkmate:
Education is meant to teach children reading, writing, arithmetic, etc., not promote an alt-left agenda that tells children they must decide at 3 if they are male or female and that grown men want to rape them, i.e., sexualizing children should NOT be a part of the curriculum nor should a foolish teacher/educator be allowed to manipulate the curriculum to include the sexualization of children nor promote their twisted "child rape" agenda. "Real world issues", taught in school, DO NOT and SHOULD NOT include sexualizing children. No matter how you word it, it's wrong. And if you're here to promote that (the sexualization of children/child rape), your stay will be brief. You can quote me on that.
Enjoy your day.

Buddy:
I'm a school teacher and I honestly wish that all we had to do is teach our kids the core subjects. Unfortunately, we are often faced with sexual issues because parents such as this woman will not teach their children anything about sex. I know because I had conservatives parents that never taught me about sex or homosexuality or anything like that. I learned by seeing dirty magazines and porn. No one should learn about sex in that way.

Lady Checkmate:
Buddy, you're trying to conflate two different issues. Sex (male and female within a marriage covenant) is natural and should be taught, at the right age. I'm sure mom is teaching her children about natural sex and the marriage covenant, husband and wife, as that's biblical. Anything outside of God's design is sin and abominations and NO, no decent parent (who loves their children) will teach their children to sin, i.e., rebel against God. Homosexuality is a sexual behavior choice and an abomination before God, so no, she is NOT teaching her children to sin. Stop your troll games, sir. They're boring, childish and simple.
Finally, you've been trolling our community for awhile, so let's wrap this up - get to the heart of your issue and why you're obsessed with us. It seems your parents taught you right, they didn't teach you to sin, BUT you chose to sin and rebelled against their sound teachings and God. How sad, for you. At least they tried. God will honor them for doing the right thing. You may be a prodigal, but you come across as reprobate. Seek Jesus Christ. If you're a prodigal, He hasn't turned His back on you, even if you turned your back on Him. Either way, you and I are done. I don't have time to be your substitute parent for you to project your issues on. My prayers are with your parents, any children you're exposed to and that if you're prodigal you return to God sooner than later. Again, stop the troll sock games and get right w/God OR move on. I'm not here to play with you.
P.S. Children are off limits here and trolling violates our community guidelines. Final warning.

Relampago Furioso #fundie returnofkings.com

The Media Uses A Strategy Of Reporting On False Rape Accusations To Destroy Men

When a politician isn’t behaving or going along with the elites’ master plan, a coordinated and underhanded rape attack is the first line of offense. The Marxist media, being prostitutes of the elite power structure, specialize in this type of character assassination. Posing as the Fourth Estate while really acting as “for hire” attack dogs is how they make their livings and curry favor with those in the corporate-government complex. When called upon, they collectively aim at a target and commence with “drive by” attacks in 90 second news stories.

It’s really quite easy to perform a character assassination on someone in a sexually repressed culture. Pick an emotional issue, like women being sexually assaulted in a culture that pedestalizes them, and then commence with endless attacks while ignoring Hillary’s endless scandals. That’s exactly what has happened with baseless accusations of sexual misconduct by Donald Trump, repeated and replayed ad nauseum in a last ditch effort to neutralize the threat to globalism posed by his candidacy.

The “Victims”

Suddenly, a senior citizen named Jessica Leeds, a former stewardess, pops up out of nowhere and is emotionally distraught by a groping that supposedly happened 37 years ago. Except her claim is baseless. She claims Trump “raised an armrest” on a flight she worked then proceeded to grab her, but the first class seats on that flight did not have adjustable armrests.

Not only that, an eyewitness said Leeds was throwing herself at Trump, as women tend to do around rich men but that she got rejected. The press would hear none of that because it would deflate both their agenda and ratings, and it would cast holier than thou females in an unholy light. Eyewitness Anthony Gilberthorpe told the press:

I have only met this accuser once and frankly cannot imagine why she is seeking to make out that Trump made sexual advances on her. Not only did he not do so (and I was present at all times) but it was she that was the one being flirtatious.

It seems the pain of that rejection led her to make up a false story.

Why do the marionettes in the media dig up these old hags and baseless sexual harassment claims? Because it works in a culture in which women can do no wrong. The media even pulled a sexual harassment character assassination attempt back in 2008 with the old battle horse John McCain.

Here’s how they did it. The New York Times did a hit piece featuring Vicki Iseman accusing John McCain of sexual conduct. Here’s the kicker: The New York Times later settled a libel suit brought on by Iseman after the campaign had ended. This is how big media and big politics operate.

The veracity of the claims matter little to a gaggle of “journalists” who would slit someone’s throat for a scoop. Similar to the documented practice of some fireman to set fires to keep their jobs, the media create scandals to gin up ratings and dehumanize those not going by the New World Order playbook.

Predictably, once one woman gets the ball rolling, a dogpile of victims ensues in a culture that lionizes victims instead of winners.

Mindy McGilliavray came out and told the press Trump “nudged” her. She told the fellow travelers in the media:

All of a sudden I felt a grab, a little nudge. I think it’s Ken’s camera bag, that was my first instinct. I turn around and there’s Donald. He sort of looked away quickly. I quickly turned back, facing Ray Charles, and I’m stunned. This was a pretty good nudge. More of a grab. It was pretty close to the center of my butt. I was startled. I jumped.

Hey, kino works that way, especially for billionaires. That’s assuming it’s true. It’s funny that instead of confronting The Donald immediately she waited 13 years to bring it up.

Kristen Anderson claimed Trump grabbed her vagina.

Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos claims Trump harassed her, even though she kept in contact with him and even sought out Donald’s help with her business. If she was emotionally scarred by Trump, why would she continue to associate herself with him?

A race is on to see who can turn being the worst “victim” into being the biggest winner of notoriety and 15 minutes of fame.

Tony R Elliott #conspiracy beforeitsnews.com

By now, many of you have seen the animated movie “Minions” which depicts small yellow characters who supposedly exist only to serve the world’s most villainous masters. The 2015 film is a spin off of the same characters in the movie Despicable Me.

The minions are small characters with cylindrical heads who have either one eye or two and all wear goggles.

With promotion, we now have Minion toys, posters, and other items for sale.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minions_(film)

What most of us are not aware of is where these characters originated. The real Minions who very closely resemble the animated Minions were Jewish children adopted by Nazi scientists for the sole purpose of using them in poison gas experiments.

The Cyclon-B gas component these kids were subjected to was the same used in Nazi gas chambers.

http://www.thedailypedia.com/2015/08/truth-behind-nazi-minions/

What the Minion movie should be telling us is that there is a push by Hollywood and the Obama Administration in getting us to eventually accept modern day Nazism. The resemblance between the Jewish kids experimented on and the animated Minion characters is much too close to be a coincidence.

With this in mind, we must assume the movie makers and writer of Minions had the glorification of the torture of these Jewish children as their goal. Otherwise, it makes no sense to make an animated comedy starring Jewish children who were tortured and killed during the Nazi Germany years.

Those of us who have an ounce of American Patriotism left in them have to ban together and get this Despicable mockery of freedom off the US market.

tandym #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

JADE HELM - WORLD WAR Z connection

We were watching World War Z again this evening, and twice when they said the word 'Zombies' towards the beginning of the film -- I got goosebumps. It might not mean anything, but thought I would bring it up since I tend to pay attention to those kinds of things.

I only saw one blatant display of Illuminati Symbolism - in the grocery store, when Pitt's character is trying to get the albuterol -- his wife is attacked and he rushes out to save her, and as he is running, over his shoulder you can see the word PHARMACY with a giant EYE. It appears twice.

Let's also not forget that this movie pushes the vaccine agenda for a do or die scenario.

And most important of all, is the connection between the THE AARP video about JADE HELM with the martial law soundtrack? Guess where they lifted that sound reel from? YEAH, WORLD WAR Z. You can hear it in the beginning, in the kitchen, while breakfast is being served.

Let's not forget the vaccination agenda being pushed by World War Z.

And TEXAS sure is getting A LOT of rain lately....

And we DID have the FIRST EBOLA patients.

Whatever happened to that family?? We never did see them again.

And on my way home from work over the last week or two, a new billboard has gone up for this company:

[link to www.mosquitonix.com]

MOSQUITO NIX

MinisterTony #fundie christianforums.com

(After the previous poster stated her children went to public school and are fine.)

1. Were your children sexually touched by a teacher or other students? If no, you were LUCKY, because these days many kids are being introduced to sex and being sexually molested at school by other kids and even sometimes teachers. You cannot trust a young child to be safe in schools.

2. Are your children devout Christians today who sincerely and truly love Jesus and want to serve Jesus? Yes or No?

3. Children are very open and impressionable and teachable at young age, and they will become conditioned, programmed and even brainwashed to believe whatever they are being exposed to the most. So having your child around teachers and students who are unbelievers in Christ and following the world, wiccan, new age, antichristian beliefs, will influence your child immensely and may make or break your child in growing up to love Jesus or follow another path.

4. Jesus set a good example. Spend most of your time surrounded by like minded people, believers. And only spend a little time around unbelievers.

2 Corinthians 6:14 Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?

5. Only mature Christians should spend a lot of time around unbelievers, when they are sharing the good news about Jesus or helping those in need. Sending a young child to an atheist/agnostic/wiccan/new age environment is not only dangerous, it's very likely to have a life long affect on that child's beliefs about Jesus. Children are being PROGRAMMED, and are not in a position to teach other children about Jesus, because sadly, there is more darkness in schools than there is light.

No Christian parent should ever send their child to school, it's too risky, mentally, emotionally, physically and spiritually. If they are not getting bullied, or sexually molested, they are being programmed and brainwashed with sexuality, body image, Darwinism and Atheism and Witchcraft and Harry Potter Sorcery!

paraphilias-are-human #fundie paraphilias-are-human.tumblr.com

so...i have a question. To put it simply, i'm a zoophile. The thing is.. I'm not anti contact. Well, in some cases i suppose but, generally, I think that with animals, they CAN consent. Not verbally of course, but they can eagerly obviously want sex. If a dog is violently humping at somebodies leg, why is it so wrong to give the dog a quick hand (literally). Especially if it makes the human and dog feel good. I dont know? i can’t even really say im non offending, honestly, as i’ve tried something with my dog before when in heat. I also frequently watch zoophilia porn (Watching and participating in bestiality is completely legal where i live, if that helps at all). I just wanna know your thoughts. Am i inherently a bad person? am i the exception, to all this positivity? I don’t want to be a bad person but I genuinely think in some cases, its fine to pleasure animals if they obviously want it.


I understand your concern. First of all, I want to make clear that no one is inherently a bad person. The world is not black and white, things are more complex than that. I don’t think you are a bad person (and less when you are even worried of being doing something wrong, that shows that you care, which is really important).
The short answer is that I agree with you. I just don’t like to post things that are clearly controversial in a very vocal and explicit way because this is not a blog where I discuss my opinions (not like my main) but just a blog for positivity. When I talk about zoophiles I talk about the ones who ‘don’t harm animals’. I’m totally against animal abuse and zoosadism (zoosadism in the sense of actions, fantasies are ok). If the animal suffers some kind of harm, pain or distress, I find that as abuse and I’m against it. But I also thing animals can consent, in the sense of being obvious when they want some kind of sexual interaction or when they are feeling uncomfortable and want you to stop. Also, some animals are specially anthropophilic, so… If you don’t harm and animal, you respect their limits and are really careful, I don’t see it as abuse.
That is why I’m not expecific with my zoo positivity posts. I don’t think all kind of sexual contact with animals is abusive, so if you don’t harm them, you are ok and not an exception for my positivity. Some people will disagree, I guess, but that is on them. For me, if you don’t hurt animals, you are ok.
However, I’d be careful about the porn. Mostly because you can’t know if that animal really wanted it, if they are being treated well or if they suffer any kind of abuse. Sometimes it can seem obvious, but how could you know? I have heard that in child porn the kids seem to be ok with it… I think when it is about porn you should be really careful because you can’t know what is happening behind the cameras (no need to say that all actual child porn is bad and abusive, I guess, I just mentioned it as an example).
[..]
So tl;dr: you are ok if you aren’t hurting animals and you deserve positivity. Be careful with porn, not because the law, but because the abuse it could be happening, and understand what I mean in my posts with “zoophiles who don’t harm animals”.
Hope you have a nice day :)
anon asks answer zoophilia discussion not positivity controversial opinions i love how this is the 'short answer' dont want to imagine the long one lol xD about me personal opinions about the blog

LegallySpeaking #fundie returnofkings.com

I'm really turned off in porn when suddenly the guy switches from vaginal to anal. It's a massive boner-killer. I'm such a porn freak that I know which porn stars never or rarely give anal sex, and like them more because of it. You already have a hole down there for that! And POOP comes out of there!

It's in the realm of interracial sex: it lowers their value. You'll note that the porn girls who are "anal princesses" fall into the same categories as the porn girls who do a lot of black sex on camera: 3rd tier in terms of looks of porn stars.

Martin Amis (!) noted the rise of anal sex in porn more than a decade
ago. He was werided out by how much he saw anal sex suddenly being pushed from porn producers without any demand from consumers. Like it was part of a social engineering plan....

I think we do have to think that gays have pushed the anal sex agenda into straight porn---this is just another subtle slippery-slope form of gay recruitment. Once you've got a guy thinking anal sex is ok and fun and got him sticking it where POOP comes from, the gays can say "well an anus is an anus and a mouth is a mouth" to a lonely or confused or drugged-up straight guy and get him into their little beds.

rueangel #fundie disqus.com

rueangel:
Well, certainly, any right thinking person must agree, that, any ,..well rounded,..5 year old should have a working knowledge of ,..male on male anal sex,..but perhaps, the subjects of the use of ,..whips, or fisting,.. should be not be introduced until the child is, at least, 6,..
Ya think,.?

Sally Edwards:
I'm not surprised this story outrages you if that's the first thing that comes to your mind when you think of homosexuality. Let's just take the most extreme sexual practices and define them all by that. By the way, where did you ever get the idea that straight people WEREN'T into all the things you listed?

rueangel:
So,.. where id you ever get the idea that I thought that these practices were limited to gay males,.?
But, anyway, while the perversions listed above are ,..occasionally, practiced by,..some,.. herteros, they are key component among gay males, & I believe that fisting is, pretty much, a gay male practice

Sally Edwards:
Practiced by what, a fraction of a percentage of them? You can't single out an entire group for any specific sexual practice. And no, I Googled "fisting" and there are entire books written about it.

rueangel:
The fact of the matter is, that, male on male anal penetration of the anus , by the penis, is the most common male homosexual activity. And,..
Such male on male anal penetration of the anus , will, in time, cause damage to the anus, & leave a percentage of those who engage in that practice to be left,..' pooing,.. in a bag that is strapped to their leg
And, not to mention the negative health affects of poking a penis around into all of that ,..poo.
But, anyway, I fail to understand why grade schoolers need o be subjected to any description of any homosexual act, whether,..'extreme',.. or not. I mean..what's the point?
But anyway, lets get real here,..In that the ,.'REAL",.. purpose of introducing the subject of homosexuality, into grade schools. & depicting it in such a ,.'positive',.. light, is to,.'brainwash',... a portion of those grade schoolers into,..'becoming',.. homosexual themselves,..which is a part of the ,.'NEW WORLD ORDER',.. agenda which includes the destruction of the family, & population control,..
And,..
I will add to that, the fact that the Zionist owned, media, is pushing this homosexual agenda, to the limit, as a means of destroying the moral fiber of the Goyim, in order to destroy western civilization, & to, thereby, genocide the White race, & thereby leave ,..'World, Zionist Jewry',.. ruling over a world of ,..'brown,.. people, with average IQs of about 70.
I refer you to the,..'KALERGI PLAN',.. which lays out this demonic, Zionist, Rothschild, conspiracy, in detail.
I note, that, while, on one hand, the Zio media, & Zio controlled educational system is pushing this homosexual agenda, in the public schools, I doubt that it is being pushed in ,..'JEWISH',.. schools, & while it is also being pushed by Zionist interests in Europe & Canada, & Australia,. as far as I know, I don't think that it is being pushed on Jewish children in Israel,..
Just turnover any rock, & underneath,it, you will find there lurking a Zionist Jew,..
Google,..'KALERGY PLAN',..

Sally Edwards:
Here’s how we know your information is a crock.
Anal sex is very common between straight couples too. How many women do I see with a bag to crap in? Come to think of it, how many gay men do I ever see who have to “go” in a bag? Zero.

rueangel:
The fact of the matter is, that, the anus is designed for,..one way,..traffic & anal sex can lead to damage that can lead to the necessity of using a ,..bag, that is strapped to the leg, & also it can spread diseas,..Did you ever head of AIDS,.? & just because you never saw such a bag, doesn't mean that it doesn't happen.
But anyway, back to the issue at hand, which is, whether, of not homosexuality should be pushed onto grade schoolers, in such a way as to encourage it practice, by children that have not yet developed their own ,..'natural, inherent, hertero sexual nature,..
As in my comment above, I point out that there is an agenda afoot, to increase the incidence of homosexuality, as a means of cutting down the birthrates, this agenda, being pushed, largely by Zionist/Rothschild/Soros NWO type entities.

Sally Edwards:
Of course 6 year olds don't need to know the particulars of anal sex, but who's talking about teaching them that in the first place? Especially when you don't teach straight intercourse to 6 year olds, either.
It's like I said to Amos earlier, you teach children about homosexuals by simply saying sometimes a boy will fall in love with another boy or a girl will fall in love with another girl. That's all you need to say.
What you've been taught about people with damaged anuses is a lie. That doesn't happen. Or if it does, it's rare and would not be specific to homosexuals. Many homosexual men don't even engage in anal sex.

rueangel:
Back in the,..'olden days',.. when I wen to grade school,, back in the first half of the last century, we somehow managed to get through K to 12 without the subject of homosexuality ever being brought up in a classroom, but somehow we managed to grow up & get through life, without, such indoctrination,..having learned through the grapevine at about age 10, or so, that there were some guys, that liked to suck on each other's peepee weenies, & we learned that these guys were called queers,..& that was about all we needed to know. It was only , somewhat later that we heard bout anal sex, which we considered to be really,..real;y disgusting.
And, as to the idea that male on male sexual attraction has something to do with ,..'love',.. The fact of the matter is that gay males are notoriously promiscuous, often having hundreds, or even thousands of ,..'partners',.. in their lifetimes.
And male on male anal sex, often has an element of ,..'domination, and/or Sado -masochism involved, especially in rape situations, whether it is male on male, or male on female,..
And
Black males,, especially, , seem to enjoy inflicting pain, and or injury on their victims with their,.. tools.,..which they use as weapons/, of attacks on the anus of their victims..
So sure, I know that herteros also, indulge in anal sex, but that is largely because anal sex is being pushed by the Zio-Media as being, particularly, exciting & ,..'trendy'.
So, I still maintain that there is nothing healthy about anal sex, from either a physical,or a mental point of view,..
And,..
If it is going to be discussed in school, the discussion should consist of warnings against it,..For all of the reasons, mention above & previously,..

Tony Zirkle (Campaigning for congress) #fundie tonyzirkle.com

My historical research has lead me to conclude that porn-prostitution is the most effective implemented weapon of mass destruction throughout history.

[Later in the thread, trying to defend this he says)

Revelation 14:8 (Whole Chapter)
And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication. (PORN in Greek)

Of all the ways to define the dragon, this writer chose to point out that his modus operandi is to make all nations drink the wrathful (porn promotes violence) wine (porn deceives) of her porn. The dragon is an international porn peddler.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

The sad thing is that when little children search the internet for a common word like “ANIMALS,” Maroon 5's video ANIMALS appears at the very top of the search results, uncensored, and kids will watch Maroon 5's video garbage instead. It appears that the Illuminati (who are satanists, Luciferian-worshippers, with their blood sacrifices and God only know what else) desire to familiarize American society with mass-murder, blood and gore, nudity, satanism, potty humor to corrupt children's manners, lesbianism, blaspheming God and the Son of God, et cetera. The reason is obvious, that is, to prepare the world to receive the coming man of sin, the Antichrist. You know, people always focus on the word “Antichrist,” naturally, but the Bible also calls him the “MAN OF SIN!” The Antichrist when he appears will epitomize wickedness.

You must realize that the “Illuminati” (the illumined ones) are a Luciferian-worshipping, blood-thirsty, cult. As such, they are Satan's most powerful servants in this world. You don't hear the names of these people in the daily news, and for a very good reason, that is, they cherish their secrecy. The Illuminati get nervous and worry just like anyone else. They don't want to go to prison, so they hide like cowards in the background. They effectively own and control all the newsmedia networks, the political religious right, the movie houses, the music industry and just about everything else dealing with money, Wall Street, the banks, the courts, Pentagon, The White House, et cetera. It's incredible how some people laugh at the mention of the Illuminati, while being corrupted and bombarded with the Illuminati through television, business, religion, Hollywood, the music industry and everywhere around us in American society today. Remember, Satan is the god of this world. They mock us by putting their occult symbols in plain sight on the most familiar place of all, which is on every U.S. one dollar bill. It's all intended to prepare the masses to receive the god of this world.

Christopher Doyle #fundie google.com.au

Are Josh Duggar, Jared Fogle Sexual Sins Genetic?

Last week, Illinois became the fourth state to ban licensed therapy for minors with unwanted same-sex attractions. Like other "RINO" governors such as New Jersey's Chris Christie, Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner is beholden to the gay lobby in Illinois, whose legislature contains a solid majority of like-minded Democrats. Sadly, I was not at all surprised to see another Republican sell out conservative social values for the sake of political expediency.

But I was shocked to hear of Subway's former poster boy, Jared Fogle, who last week was preparing to plead guilty to child exploitation and pornography charges. Also troubling was CNN's Dr. Drew, who commented to Anderson Cooper (who happens to be gay-identified) that Fogle's behavior has "genetic" contributions. Later in the week, it was also revealed that former reality TV star Josh Duggar was outed, along with 32 million other users, for cheating on his wife with the assistance of a website called Ashley Madison, which helps adulterers conveniently and discreetly meet other partners for sexual encounters.

Absolutely none of these sexual issues are genetic or biological.

Josh Duggar was not born with a pre-inclination to inappropriately touch his younger sisters. His genes did not pre-dictate his choice to cheat on his wife. For various reasons, Duggar developed what can be presumed to be a heterosexual pornography addiction.

Similarly, Jared Fogle was not born a pedophile. There is absolutely no sound science to support Dr. Drew's commentary that his genetics contributed to this behavior.

In my professional opinion (and I am hypothesizing), Jared developed a sexual appetite for children through various sources of wounding in his early years. Fogle probably experienced a lack of bonding in childhood and adolescence, followed by bullying due to his overweight condition. This most likely alienated him from his peers and caused him to be developmentally stuck where the childhood bullying (trauma) was the worst. If the trauma is not healed, the object that he didn't bond with (childhood peers) later becomes sexualized in adulthood in order to repair the wound.

This is not so different from unwanted same-sex attraction. When boys do not bond with their fathers, they may also fail to attach to their male peers in youth. When puberty occurs, all of these unmet emotional needs for the same sex become unconsciously eroticized. In other cases, sexual, physical or emotional abuse from older same-sex persons may cause a deep wound in a young male, causing him to once again detach from normal bonding with the same sex and then later sexualize these unmet needs for male acceptance and affection.

Last week, Illinois politicians threw these sexually confused youth under the bus by continuing on a destructive path that started in 2012, when gay activists in California introduced a bill to prohibit any type of therapy for individuals (both adults and minors) who were distressed over unwanted same-sex attractions. They later removed the ban for adults in order to better sell the idea that gay children were being abused and "converted" by licensed therapists who were using all sorts of crazy methods, such as electric shock therapy.

Just so we're straight (no pun intended), this bill was intended to outlaw therapy for everyone, not just children, whose sexual identity did not match their unwanted same-sex attractions.

It's important for readers to understand the difference between sexual identity and unwanted sexual attractions.

Sexual identity refers to the core sense of self, or one's own belief, of who they are sexually. As a professional counselor, every day I sit with clients whose sexual identity is heterosexual, but they are conflicted with unwanted sexual attractions of different varieties. Some are conflicted with unwanted attractions for children (often called pedophilia) or hebephilia (if the object of lust is a pre-teen or teenager).

Others have unwanted attractions towards the same sex, or what is also known as homosexuality. Still, others have unwanted desires for the opposite sex, which is sometimes referred to as heterosexual addiction.

Coming back to the cases of Jared and Josh, neither of these young men self-labeled their sexual identities as "pedophile" or "sex addict." This behavior resulted from emotional deficits and deep wounds. In both cases, these men have expressed remorse over their sexual behaviors and are now experiencing the consequences. Both of these young men also could have greatly benefitted from psychotherapy to help resolve their issues. If we continue on our society's current trajectory, the far left will outlaw the chance for young men like Josh and Jared to heal, while at the same time, put other youth at risk of also being victimized. Youth with unwanted same-sex attractions in four states now (and Washington, D.C.) are at risk for similar fates.

Do not be fooled. The far left is not interested in protecting gay youth from "conversion" therapy. Their goal is to completely remove all sexual constraint and restraint from the social fabric of this country, and eventually, the world.

The left opposes abstinence education in favor of so-called "comprehensive sexual education" programs which often teach public school students how to use condoms by placing them over bananas and playing relay races with each other in class to quickly get protection before engaging in underage sex in real life.

Then, when over half of these young people fail to consistently and correctly wear the condoms during sex, the government funds abortion providers to get rid of their "mistakes," while Planned Parenthood makes another profit by harvesting the aborted organs, tissues and body parts, then selling them.

So don't be confused. We need to call this latest attempt to ban sexually confused youth from getting help for what it really is: The far left's attempt to sexually enslave the next generation. They are not protecting anyone. It's sick, and it's bad policy for conservatives and liberals alike.

To support #TherapyEquality in the remaining 46 states, join us for the Third Annual Safe Exit Summit in Washington, D.C. on October 3-4. For more information, visit www.SafeExitSummit.org.

Bryan Crawford #homophobia #conspiracy #fundie #dunning-kruger finalcall.com

Using research conducted in his latest book, “Understanding the Assault on the Black Man, Black Manhood and Black Masculinity,” as the foundation for his lecture, Dr. Muhammad masterfully detailed the various ways in which the Black man has been chemically castrated and feminized—which involves much more than sexual identity or sexual desire.

Citing a scholarly article, “Neurohormonal Functioning and Sexual Orientation: A Theory of Homosexuality-Heterosexuality,” co-authored by Dr. Lee Ellis and Dr. M. Ashley Ames, and published by the American Psychological Association in 1987, Dr. Muhammad revealed how scientists have been researching “gender inversions”—switching male orientation to female and vice versa.
“The whole phenomenon of Black homosexuality today is a spawn of the White man’s science,” Dr. Muhammad argued.

He went on to explain that over a span of 30 years, culminating in 1987, scientists had mastered creating both neurological and behavioral sexual inversions in lab animals, using five different strategies designed to produce the same outcome: a form of castration that essentially caused males of the species to behave and act like females, particularly after the onset of puberty.

“Evidence has accumulated that many of the experiments conducted with laboratory animals have close parallels in humans,” the article stated. “We show that at least four of the five methods used in laboratory animals to induce inversions of sexual orientation appear to have similar effects in humans.”

For his lecture, Dr. Muhammad focused on two of those five methods. One was the weaponizing of a pregnant woman’s womb by tricking her immune system into producing antibodies that attack testosterone produced by her male fetus. The other was chemically inducing gender through introduction of “antiandrogens,” or drugs that can block or reduce the amount testosterone present in men.

“Testosterone does way more than control the male libido,” Dr. Muhammad explained. “Testosterone produces the male brain and controls masculine behavior. Testosterone masculinizes the brain of men. … It masculinizes behavior. What testosterone does, it encourages the behavior intended to acquire dominance. Scientists have said that an example of testosterone as a dominance hormone is that people who revolt against oppressors, their testosterone level is high. So, high testosterone is a biochemical attribute of those who revolt against oppressors.”

In the section of the article titled, “Pharmacological Causes of Human Sexual Inversions,” it reads, “As already discussed for laboratory animals, the evidence that drugs can cause sexual inversions, including inverted sexual orientation, is strong.”

The article goes on to say, “One set of drugs, the progestins (or progestogens), have been repeatedly implicated as having sexually inverting effects.”

Depo-Provera is an example of these drugs. It is commonly administered to women as a form of birth control, either through injection or a pill. Because it is an antiandrogen, Depo-Provera can block or significantly reduce the amount of testosterone produced in males, effectively feminizing them. This is usually accomplished by introducing Depo-Provera to women who are already pregnant, or after they give birth and are breastfeeding their babies.

Dr. Muhammad said in hospitals, doctors and nurses are “hawks,” immediately trying to get women to go on birth control after having babies. Female estrogen hormones can be passed along to encourage feminization in male children, he said. In addition, excess estrogen can cause masculinization in both female children and their mothers.

“The Black lesbian phenomenon, is scientifically produced,” he said.

Todd Weiler #fundie rawstory.com

Utah lawmakers declared a public health crisis in a ceremonial bill April because they think residents are viewing too much pornography. But now, Todd Weiler, the same lawmaker who proposed the “health crisis” bill, announced legislation that would put statewide filters in place to ensure no Utah residents could view pornography.

Internet users would be required to contact their internet service provider to opt-out of the filter so they can view adult content, the Independent reports.

The Utah legislature is already out of session, but Weiler wants to get a start on next year’s slate of internet censorship laws so he is beginning this campaign as soon as possible. He claims he got the idea from the UK’s Coalition Government announcement in 2013 that made internet users opt-out of internet censorship, including porn filtering.

In an interview with the Salt Lake Tribune, he said: “I believe that pornography today is like tobacco was 70 years ago. 70 years ago people said tobacco’s not addictive and it’s not harmful, and that’s what some people are saying about pornography today. I happen to believe that it is addictive and it is harmful.”

Weiler believes pornography is a threat to traditional marriage. “It’s undermining relationships, and ultimately if someone gets divorced, that affects the government, because we end up with more children and spouses on government welfare.”

As any kid who grew up with internet filters knows, it’s relatively simple to circumvent restrictions, but the law concerns some First Amendment activists who are fearful it restricts free speech. However, Weiler claimed that the First Amendment also protected him from being forced to view ‘second-hand’ porn at McDonalds.

The majority of the state consists of members of the Church of Latterday Saints or Mormons, which has a track record of manipulating members into believing they are addicted to pornography when they aren’t. The church has a ban on the use of pornography, but has had no luck in shaming people away from viewing it. Utah residents are 50 percent more likely than other states to search for Mormon pornography on PornHub. Studies show that those who view pornography more than once a week have a tendency to be more religious.

Cam Triggs #fundie desiringgod.org

The hot steam of a deadline breathes down your neck. It’s two o’clock in the morning, and you are alone in your office completing a last-minute project. As you viciously beat away at the keyboard, you pause and turn to the Internet as a resource. While browsing the Web, you notice an ad: “Free Porn.” You look at the popup appalled, yet intrigued.

In the isolated dark office, sin disguises itself as “free” — free of cost, free of accountability, and free of consequences. Don’t believe the lie. Deconstructing the phrase “Free Porn” may save your marriage and ultimately your relationship with Christ. Here is a truth we desperately need today: There is no such thing as free porn.

Free Porn Is False Advertisement

Satan, the world, and the flesh combine to make a perverse, yet persuasive marketing firm. Satan is the source and father of lies (John 8:44). The world is under his control (1 John 5:19), and the flesh swindles us to believe God may be mocked while our hearts deceive us as well (Galatians 6:7–8; Jeremiah 17:9). It is clear then that spiritual warfare has much to do with battling the lies of this unholy trinity. It should not surprise us that Satan, the world, and our own flesh feed us lies to enhance the temptation of sin.

A wise Puritan said, “Satan presents the bait and hides the hook.” He is a crafty enemy that presents immediate pleasure, yet hides catastrophic consequences. There are few lies greater today than the myth that porn is free.

There is always great cost in viewing porn. It is never free. It always costs money. It will always demand we surrender integrity. It will always force the corruption of Christ-centered character. Many men have paid for so-called “free porn” with salty tears, broken marriages, and hours of counseling. Many women have paid for so-called “free porn” with vicious memories, broken bodies, and shattered souls.

God frees us by giving us the truth (John 8:32). The simple truth is that porn always costs us dearly, and it is never a victimless crime. Peer-reviewed research suggests that porn is highly addictive, negatively affects our behavior, and functionally operates as a destructive drug.

Porn has also been proven to ruin marriages, stress relationships, and decrease the desire for true intimacy with monogamous mates. In other words, porn kills relationships and diminishes our very being.

Porn also leaves a trail of tears and scarred victims. Many in the porn industry have testified of disease, drugs, violence, rape, and even sexual trafficking plaguing the business.

And above all, porn dishonors God. It perverts the sacred creation of God and exchanges it with lust, selfishness, and greed. What God created for good, porn perverts for evil. It takes his good gift of sex and devalues it. Porn makes sex about deviant pleasure, cheap romance, and gross satisfaction.

God intends sex to be so much more. God created sex for the purpose of cultivating intimacy between a man and his wife, and to be the means by which the blessing of children arrive. It is no coincidence, then, that both children and marriage are now devalued in today’s porn-ified culture.

Freedom in Jesus

Porn is sinful, and the saying about sin is still true: It will cost you more than you can pay and make you stay longer than you can stay. Sin is not controllable or stagnant. Sin is decadent. First you are walking in sin, then you are standing in sin, and before you know it you are sitting in it (Psalm 1:1–2). The same is true with porn. You think you can quit whenever you want. But you can’t. Porn is increasingly addictive, readily available, and like any other addiction more is needed the longer the practice continues. For many, porn has evolved from a curious click into a crippling addiction.

Here is the good news: There is freedom from “free porn” in Christ Jesus. The false security, enslaving escape, and luring lust of porn will only leave you empty. But in the good news of redemption in Christ, we find concrete security, promised perseverance, and true water that quenches the soul.

In Christ, we find the intimacy we truly desire as reconciled children to an almighty Father. In Christ, we find the free offer of grace that comes without any strings attached or any webs that deceitfully entangle us into bondage.

May Jesus truly set you free with the true freedom that exposes the lie of free porn.

Pilleater #racist asianaryanism.com

The biggest obstacle that is against unifying the Asian-Aryan identity is the struggle of being racially considered, “White,” “Asian,” or “Asian-Asian.”

Jennifer Suzuki, who wrote “Confessions of a Submissive East Asian Woman,” wrote that being “White” is the safe way to go. I disagree.

It’s a simple answer. White people need to be “yellow-pilled” into Asian-Aryanism and then whitewashed Asians would naturally come over when White guys show their pride in Asian-Aryanism.

But the normie doesn’t understand why the word “Asian-Aryanism” should be fought for. Why choose the word “Aryan,” when this has nothing to do with the Middle-East tribes of Iran?

Obviously, “Aryan” is used in the whimsical sense. As in, a master race that will be eventually fulfilled. Thus, “Asian-Aryanism,” is a coming master race that mixes both the great blood of Whites and Asians. This does not mean White or Asian genocide. This is a natural current of events that the Eurasian millennials should pick up. Future White and Asians will be conserved.

“Asian-Aryan,” is a playful internet meme. It sounds like a skinhead with an Asian girlfriend, or a nerdy avant-garde college kid and his artsy-farsy Asian girlfriend. Those terms do apply more towards Asian-Arynaism because the word has it has roots with punk rock subcultures. Already, we find such cultural things like “Health Goths,” “Seapunk,” and “Furries.” “Asian-Aryanism” is one of new many influential subcultures (I can thank Amped Asia for getting the Asian-Aryanism subculture out there).

But being more serious, Asian-Aryanism will find a future cause. A new name like “Pan-Eurasinism,” “Eurasianism,” or “Asiansexulity,” will become the surrogate name found on a future Wikipedia article. Asian-Aryanism is an umbrella term, conglomerating all influenced subcultures on the internet. This is the same way the “Alt-Right” accepted all right-wing and reactionary ideologies. Asian-Aryanism will do the same with Asian culture.

However, there has been no recent Asian-Aryan influence in our culture is because there hasn’t been any words or clubs defending the unknown interest. The first word to appear a decade ago was “wapanese,” a derogatory term for a white kid that believes he is a living anime character. Since then, the word has evolved into “weeb” and still enjoys a presence in internet culture.

Also in the past year, “The Anime Right,” has been formed and represents a National Socialist interest in Eastern culture. Still, they associate with extreme white nationalist politics. We see movements that flirt with Asian-Aryanism, but don’t go towards the next step.

This is a problem with unifying people with the same interest. Asian-Aryanism is stuck between the position of being consider a White man’s movement or an Asian infiltration project.

So, which one of these is it? The answer is neither.

Asian-Aryanism is a third-position party looking for it’s own identity beyond White or Asian culture. At the same time, Asian-Aryanism respects both the White and Asian races. Asian-Aryanism belongs to the sons and daughters of the two beautiful civilizations.

Asian-Aryanism is against cuck-minded politics, race-mixing, two-sided answers, anti-white rhetoric, and arrogant Asian infiltration.

Asian-Aryanism will respect White nationalism and appreciate the culture of Western Civilization, while distancing itself and finding it’s own Asian-Aryan culture for greater meaning. Arrogant cultures of Asia will try and get all the Eurasians on their side of the battle, but Asian-Aryans should look out for their own interest first, and not of the foreign interest of a greater race that will not care about the Asian-Aryan destiny.

If an Asian-Aryan decides to be associated as “White” or “Asian,” he or she is looking for a ultimate amnesty and rather feel comfortable being around one of the two mentioned people. Unfortunately, the hegemonic races of “White” and “Asian” will do their best to cover up the other side for a mixed race person, and Eurasians who make this choice between the two have no future destiny.

I understand many of my Eurasian friends choose “White” or “Asian” to feel safe in a normative society. I respect both sides as well. But this is not the answer. The point of Asian-Aryanism is to go towards the third position. A new position that respects both sides and struggles finding a new unity and identity.


I would like the following five groups to be friendly and supportive towards each other, like family members:

1. White-Male/Asian-Female and Asian-Male/White-Female couples.

2. White-Weebs and Whitewashed-Asians.

3. Half/Hafu/Eurasian people.

4. People with central Asian blood.

5. Any Whites or Asians that want to join in and commit to the Asian-Aryan identity.

Like the concept of being an “American,” this is the concept of being an “Asian-Aryan.” It is not an exclusive party of minorities, but a big entry level region where all parties of White and Asian can be accepted into.

Asian-Aryanism is against the Kalergi plan. We have no foundations with Judeo-Christian culture. Rather, the two cultures of Christianity and Asian religions will be mixed together, creating a bastard one. …Go to church on Sunday, Shinto prayers at the shrine.

Asian-Aryanism is a bond between two parties, Whites and Asians. Other non-races, like Blacks and Mexicans, might show similar interest. But Asian-Aryanism looks out for it’s own interest, and slams the door upon these darker races. If Blacks and Mexicans like Asian culture, let them start their own institutions and see how far they go.

Asian-Aryanims has no ill feelings towards black people. Race, IQ, and Evolution is a true factor, like genetics itself. The culture of blacks is not appropriate for Asian-Aryanism. If black race mixing were to occur with Asian-Aryans, then surly the Kalergi plan would come into effect. Asian-Aryanism is against the multicultural (diversity) and egalitarian philosophy of the globalized world.

Asian-Aryanism will respect an Afro-Aryan institution and will show support. Black culture, like hip-hop, rap, and ebonics, might be appreciated by a few Asian-Aryans. This is all fun and games. If they want to start an Afro-Asian thing, by all means, good luck and let them do so. But the focus is on Asian-Aryanism, a long spiritual and cultural bond between two great races of the world, White and Asian. There is no traction between Blacks and any other race.

Asian-Aryanism sounds confusing to the normie because it sounds like it is a race-mixing plan. Again, Asian-Aryanism is not about race-mixing, since there is already a large Asian-American culture that has happen from a previous generation that has accidentally race-mixed. Asian-Aryanism is a cultural movement of these lost peoples, from race-mixers to anime fans, that see their own destiny between Whites and Asians. Both sides will be accepted, but Asian-Aryanism is the main identity.

So, where does Asian-Aryanism fall under? It’s an umbrella term to describe the cultural and loving interest between Whites and Asians that will seek it’s own future together. Anyone in the movement may have different levels of autonomy. Whether that means race-mxing or allies of support. Asian-Aryanism is an institution that is saving a generation of children from the claws of the disgusting multicultural paradigm. Asian-Aryanism goes beyond the petty conflict of racially naive Whites and bug-like Asians that thrive towards world domination.

Asian-Aryanism is an avant-garde identity politic that is open to new levels of culture and creation. Faith, Folk, and Family in a new unity together.

Jennie #sexist allthingsvice.com

Men disgust me. They are solely responsible for child porn, rapes, torture, murder, sexual harassment, domestic violence, renting prostitutes, watching porn, producing porn, stalkings, and more deviant, evil acts. “The evil that men do lives on and on..” There could never be a truer quote. Men protect other men, that’s why we never know the names of all of the men who buy or rent kids and infants for sexual purposes, who rent prostitutes (johns), rapists, etc. Judges who are men give rapists and murderers of women a slaps on the wrist, if anything. Evil. The destruction (mostly murder) of females is called “Femicide.” It’s getting worse every second. Women are honor killed, forced to have their genitals mutilated, murdered, tortured, sexually harassed, emotionally abused, etc. exclusively by men. When confronted with these atrocities, men try to change the subject quickly. “Women do this stuff too,” they claim. Bullshit.

They just cannot face facts and admit that they are guilty of these crimes against women. Which sex takes up all of the prisons and jails? Males. This is because men are notoriously violent, sadistic, and sick in the head. Women give life and men destroy it. I wish that some day all men could pay dearly for their crimes. Castration would be a great way to start. Rapists can not be rehabilitated. This is a well known fact. Just cut it off. Problem solved. There must be radical ways to deal with evil men, or life will never improve for women in this world. Thanks to patriarchy, this will never happen. Radical measures must be taken. I’ll leave them to your imagination so I don’t go to prison or a psychiatric ward….

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

Because the Island of Greenland is geographically shaped like the head of a bear, wolf or fox, its silhouette appears to only have one eye. . This shape is coincidentally replicated in the shape of southern Texas with Austin, Texas, representing the eye of the bear. The single eye is symbolic of the blindness that Greenland suffers for it is cut-off from the underworld, relying completely on the CIA of Switzerland for its survival. The one-eyed Beast of Greenland is most commonly depicted as the Eye of Providence (i.e., the All-Seeing Eye of G.O.D., otherwise known as Greenland of Denmark). The Eye of Providence and the Bear of Greenland is coincidentally found on the flag of Šiauliai, the fourth largest city in Lithuania. In Norse Mythology, the god of Odin, who coincidentally only has one eye, goes by the name of “Battle Wolf” and “Bear”, both tributes to Greenland. The Biblical “Number of the Beast” (i.e., 666) also appears to be a direct reference to Greenland as the Holy Bible is the allegorical and metaphorical history book of the Greco-Roman Empire. The term “Beast” (B+S+T) was evidently derived from the term “Best” (B+S+T) which is why Greenland was chosen as the home of the Greco-Roman Empire. The Mesopotamian god Ugallu, is known as the “Big Weather-Beast”, for the “Ugallu” (G+L) acronymically equates to Greenland. Lastly, in Disney’s Monsters, Inc., the character known as "Mike Wazowski" is depicted as a one-eyed green monster, a modern tribute to the Beast of Greenland.

Bear of Greenland
The term “Bear” (B+R) is constructed by the acronyms of “Babylon” and “Rome”, the former capital city and name of the Greco-Roman Empire. Since Greenland resides above or over the Earth (i.e., in heaven), the German word “über” (B+R) translates to “above”, “over” and “across”. The Bear of Greenland is flanked by Bermuda Triangle in the Atlantic Ocean and the Bering Strait in the Pacific Ocean. Boreas (B+R+S), meaning "Devouring One", was the Greek god of the cold north wind, Aurora, was the Roman goddess of the dawn. Consequently, the Arora Borealis (B+R+L+S) are the Northern Lights which shine upon the Bear of Greenland. Aside from the god of Odin who goes by “Bear”, Búri (B+R) was the first Norse god in Norse mythology who became the father of the other gods, including Borr (B+R), a god who had three sons, Odin, Vili and Vé. The names of these metaphorical sons are deciphered as follows: “Odin” (D+N) represents the third and final den (home) of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland; “Vili” (V+L) represents the veil of secrecy which allows the Roman Empire to thrive unabated in Greenland, until now; and “Vé” (V) is an acronym for Victoria, the Roman goddess of victory. Lastly, Britannia (B+R+T+N) the female personification of England, while Hibernia (H+B+R+N) the female personification of Ireland, both of which have the “Bear” (B+R) of Greenland within their respective names.

Den of Greenland
Because a bear, wolfs or fox must have a den to live in, the term “Den” (D+N) has become synonymous with Greenland. Since the Romans were the first to invent gunpowder and “Dynamite” (D+N+M+T), it was give the name of “Den Might” for it represented the power of the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland. Tributes to the “Den” of Greenland are found throughout popular culture, including but not limited to: Business: Denny’s; Denner; Celebrities: Dan Rather; Harry Houdini; James Dean; John Madden; Joe Biden, Madonna; Michael Jordan; and Princess Diana; Culture: “Danny Boy”; Mythology: Odin, a god in Norse Mythology; Tuesday: Middle Low German (Dingesdag); German (Dienstag); Dutch (dinsdag); Afrikaans (Dinsdag); Thursday: Proto Germanic (Þunras dagaz); Old English (Þunresdæg); Old High German (Donarestag); Middle Low German (Donersdag); German (Donnerstag); Dutch (donderdag); Afrikaans (Donderdag); Wednesday: Proto Germanic (Wodanas dagaz); Old English (Wodnesdæg); Old Saxon (Wôdanesdag); Old High German (Wôdanstag/Wuotanstag); Middle Low German (Wodenesdag); Scottish (Wadensday); and Words: condone; Dan; Danish; dance; dandelion; dawn; dean; den; dentist; Dianetics; dine; dinner; dinosaur; don; done; donate; done; donner kebap; don’t; dune; dynamic; dynasty; dynamite; and Great Dane.

The Borg
The “Borg” of Star Trek are an allegorical metaphor for the Greco-Roman Empire in Greenland which rules the world via the Babylon System. The Borg refers to a fictional alien race that appears as recurring antagonists within the Star Trek franchise. The Borg is a species that have been turned into cybernetic organisms functioning as drones of the Collective, or the hive. The Borg force other species into their collective and connect them to "the hive mind", an act called assimilation. Similar to fascism, this process entails violence, abductions, and injections of cybernetic implants. The Borg are infamous for their phrase, "You will be assimilated". This mantra is evident today as all those who do not assimilate into the capitalistic Babylon System are ultimately destroyed, economically or physically.

Wolf of Greenland
Because Greenland is geographically shaped like the head of a wolf, numerous references to wolfs are found through mythology and popular culture. The term “M. canina” meaning “werewolf”, is a mythological human who has the ability to shapeshift into a wolf or a wolf-like creature, either purposely or after being placed under a curse. The term “canina” is a direct reference to Canaan (i.e., Greenland), home of the werewolf. “The Boy Who Cried Wolf” is one of Aesop's Fables where the idiom to "cry wolf", meaning to give a false alarm, was ultimately derived from. To “cry wolf” was likely derived in respect to attacks emanating from Greenland (e.g., Greco-Roman Vikings). Another idiom “keep the wolf from the door” was also likely derived in respect to the Wolf of Greenland. In the language of German, the number “12” is pronounced “zwölf” which equates to “Zion Wolf”, a reference to Mt. Zion in Greenland. The book "Little Red Riding Hood" is a European fairy tale about a young girl and a Big Bad Wolf, a metaphor for Greenland. The story revolves around a girl called Little Red Riding Hood (i.e., the Roman Empire), after the red hooded cape and cloak that she wears. Lastly, Beowulf is an Old English heroic epic poem set in Scandinavia which is commonly cited as one of the most important works of Anglo-Saxon literature.

Bear in Popular Culture
Tributes to the Bear of Greenland, the term “Bear”, or terms containing the consonants of “B” and “R” (e.g., beer) are found throughout popular culture, including but not limited to: Athletes: Charles Barkley (NBA); Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (NBA); Kobe Bryant (NBA); Larry Bird (NBA); LeBron James (NBA); and Tom Brady (NFL); Calendar: month of February; month of September; month of October; month of November; and month of December; Celebrities: Brad Pitt; Bruno Mars; Julia Roberts; Justin Bieber; Justin Timberlake; Mark Wahlberg; Pierce Brosnan; Robert DeNiro; Robert Pattinson; and Steven Spielberg; Coaches: Bear Bryant; and Vince Lombardi, for which the Super Bowl Trophy is named after; Computing: Cyber-attacks, digital attacks that can be launched from anywhere in the world; Corporations: Barclays; Bayer; Behr; Blackberry; Braun; Bridgestone; Brinks; Burberry; Burger King; Burlington Northern; Burton; Halliburton; KBR; Lamborghini; Marlboro; Subaru; and Julius Bar; Cities: Barcelona, Spain; Beirut, Lebanon; Berkeley, California; Berlin, Germany; Bern, Switzerland; Birmingham, Alabama; Birmingham, England; Bristol, Connecticut; Brooklyn, New York; Burbank, California; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Culture: “White man’s burden”; Financial Markets: Barrel of oil; Bear Market; Gold bar; Stock broker; Inventors: Albert Einstein; and Johan Guttenberg; Legal: Bar Association; Mascots: Baylor University Bears; Brown University Bears; the Chicago Bears; the Chicago Cubs; the Memphis Grizzlies; Mercer University Bears; Missouri State University Bears; Morgan State University Bears; Oakland University Golden Grizzlies; University of California at Berkeley Golden Bears; University of Northern Colorado Bears; University of Maine Black Bears; and University of Montana Grizzlies; Military: Ft. Bragg; Green Berets are worn by special forces military in the Australian, French and Dutch commandos, as well as the United States Army Special Forces; Places: Bahrain; Barbados; Bering Strait; Bermuda; Bermuda Triangle; Bora Bora; Bourbon Street; Brazil; Brunei; Burkina Faso; Burma; Burundi; Great Britain; Liberia; Luxembourg; Nebraska; and Siberia; Politicians: Barack Obama (President of the U.S.); Ehud Barak (Prime Minister of Israel); Gordon Brown (UK Prime Minister); John O. Brennan (Director of CIA); and Silvio Berlusconi (Prime Minister of Italy); Politics: Brady Bill (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act); the 2nd Amendment and the “Right to keep and bear arms”; Religion: Abraham, founding father or Israel; Barabbas; Bartholomew; Bereishit, the first book in the Jewish Bible; Sports Franchises: Atlanta Braves; FC Bayern Munich; and FC Barcelona; Toys: Care Bears; and teddy bear; Television: The Borg of Star Trek; Television Anchors: Brian Williams (NBC); Chris Berman (ESPN); and Tom Brokaw (NBC); Witchcraft: Abracadabra, an incantation used as a magic word in stage magic tricks; and Words: aberration; abortion; abroad; algebra; amber; Amber Alert; Aurora Borealis; bar; barb; barb wire; barber; bare; bare foot; bargain; barge; bark; barn; baron; barracuda; bear, bear arms; bear down; beard; beer; beret hat; berries; berry, bird; birth; birthday; board; border; bore; boring; born; borrow; bourbon; bra; brace; brackets; Braham Bull; braid; brail; bran; branch; brand; brand new; brandy; brass; brat; brave; brawl; brawn, BRB; breach; break; breakfast; breast; breath; bread; breed; brew; briar; bridge; brie cheese; brief; bright; bring; brink; britches; broccoli; broil; bronze; broom; brother; brow; brown; brunch; brush; brutal; bur; bureau; bureaucracy; burgundy; burglar; burka; burn; burrito; caliber; candy bar; celebrate; cyber; embarrassed; eye brow; labor; laboratory; liberty; library; lumbar; neighbor; number; robbery; rubber; side burns; somber; starboard; and suburban.

Wolf Mascots
Mascot-related tributes to the Wolf of Greenland are found throughout the world, including but are not limited to: Australia: Brisbane Wolves FC, a soccer team; South Coast Wolves Football Club, or "Wollongong Wolves," a football team; Western Wolves FC, a football team; and Windsor Wolves, a rugby team; Belgium: La Louvière Wolves, an American football team; Canada: Akwesasne Wolves, a hockey team; La Tuque Wolves, a hockey team; Ottawa Wolves RFC, a rugby team; Ripley Wolves, a hockey team; Shelburne Wolves, a hockey team; St. Catharines Wolves, a soccer team; Sudbury Wolves, a team in the Ontario Hockey League; Sudbury Jr. Wolves, a team in the Northern Ontario Junior Hockey League; and Sudbury Wolves (EPHL), a defunct team in the Eastern Professional Hockey League; England: Walthamstow Wolves, a speedway team; Warrington Wolves, a rugby league team; Wolverhampton Wanderers F.C., a football team commonly known as "Wolves"; and Worcester Wolves, a basketball team; Indonesia: Tangerang Wolves FC, a football team; Ireland: Dublin Wolves, an ice hockey team; Nigeria: Warri Wolves F.C., a soccer team; Pakistan: Faisalabad Wolves, a cricket team; Scotland: Edinburgh Wolves, a Scottish American Football team; Sri Lanka: Wayamba Wolves, a cricket team; Switzerland: EHL Wolves, a Swiss ice hockey team; and the United States: American Wolves, a wrestling team; Chicago Wolves, a minor league ice hockey team; Carolina Raging Wolves, a football team; Connecticut Wolves, a hockey team; Detroit Wolves, a baseball team; Idaho Wolves, a soccer team; Los Angeles Wolves, a former professional soccer team; Manchester Wolves, a minor league arena football team; Minnesota Timberwolves, an NBA basketball team; North Carolina State University Wolfpack, sports teams of North Carolina State University; Stockton Wolves, an arena football team; Stony Brook University Seawolves, sports teams of Stony Brook University; University of Nevada Wolf Pack, sports teams of University of Nevada; and the Wisconsin Wolves, a football team.

One-Eyed Creatures
There are at least 65 one-eyed creatures in mythology, religion and fiction, all tribute to the one-eyed Beast of Greenland. These include but are not limited to: Agent Pleakley: Agent Pleakley, a one-eyed creature in in the film “Lilo & Stitch” (2002); Ahgg: Ahgg, the witches' giant spider with one eye in the center of his forehead in “My Little Pony: The Movie” (1986); Ahriman: Ahriman, a species of monster from the Japanese role-playing game series "Final Fantasy" (1987); Alpha Centauri: Alpha Centauri, green hermaphrodite hexapod with one huge eye in the “Doctor Who” episode "The Curse of Peladon" (1972); Arimaspi: Arimaspi or Arimaspoi, a legendary people of northern Scythia that were "always at war with their neighbors" and stealing gold from griffins. They had a single eye in the center of the forehead; Balor: Balor, a figure from Irish mythology who was known for his evil eye that could kill just by looking at you. It was prophesied that he would be killed by his grandson, so he attempted to murder his grandchildren; Basilisk: Basilisk, large one-eyed mutant in Marvel Comics' “New X-Men” (2004-2008); Big Billy: Big Billy, a one-eyed creature in “The PowerPuff Girls” (1998-2005) episode entitled "School House Rocked"; Big Dan T.: Big Dan T., a character in the Coen Brothers film “O Brother, Where Art Thou” (2000), who is intended to emulate the Cyclops from Homer's "Odyssey; B.O.B.: B.O.B. (Bicarbonate Ostylezene Benzoate), gelatinous one-eyed creature in “Monsters vs. Aliens” (2009); Bongo Bongo: Bongo Bongo, a one-eyed creature from the “Legend of Zelda” (1986-2014); Cyclops: Cyclops, a race of giants in Greek and Roman mythology, including Polyphemus. They had a single eye in the center of the forehead; Cyclops, one-eyed creatures in monsters in the popular Japanese role-playing game series "Dragon Quest" (1986); Cyclops, one-eyed creatures in the film “The 7th Voyage of Sinbad” (1958); Cyclops, one-eyed creatures in the role-playing game “Dungeons and Dragons” (1974-Present); and Cyclops, Tyson, Percy Jackson's one-eyed half-brother in “Percy Jackson and the Olympians” (2005-2009); Cyclopskin: Cyclopskin, one-eyed creatures in the role-playing game “Dungeons and Dragons” (1974-Present); Cylon Centurions: Cylon Centurions, one-eyed creatures in the sci-fi franchise “Battlestar Galactica” (1978); Dajjal: Dajjal, the anti-Christ in the Islamic religion that only has one eye; Dalek Sec: Dalek Sec, monster that became a one-eyed Dalek-human hybrid in “Doctor Who” (1963-1989); Darklops Zero: Darklops Zero, prototype of Darklops in the film “Ultraman Zero: The Revenge of Belial” (2010); Draken: Draken, a one-eyed sea monster in animated series “Jumanji (1996-1999); Drethdock: Drethdock, a one-eyed creature from the Sega Saturn game “Battle Monsters” (1995); Dusclops: Dusclops, a one-eyed ghost in Pokémon (1996-Present); Dusknoir: Dusknoir, a one-eyed ghost in Pokémon (1996-Present); Duskull: Duskull, a one-eyed ghost in Pokémon (1996-Present); Evil Eye: Evil Eye, a one-eyed monster in the online RPG “MapleStory” (2003); Gohma: Gohma, a one-eyed creature from the “Legend of Zelda” (1986-2014); Graeae: The Graeae, three witches (or sisters) that shared one eye and one tooth between them; Hagen: Hagen or Högni, a Burgundian warrior in German and Norse legend that is depicted in some accounts as having only one eye; Hitotsume-kozo: Hitotsume-kozo, monsters (obake) in Japanese folklore. They had a single giant eye in the center of their face; Imbra: Imbra, a one-eyed idol and the highest god of Kafiristan in the novella “The Man Who Would Be King” (1888); Jian: Jian, a bird in Chinese mythology with only one eye and one wing. A pair of such birds were dependent on each other and inseparable; Kabandha: Kabandha, a demon with no head, no neck, one large eye on the breast, and a mouth on the stomach. Kabandha appears in Hindu mythology as a character of Ramayana; Kang and Kodos: Kang and Kodos, a recurring one-eyed alien duo in the “The Simpsons” (1989-Present); Kerack: Kerack, alien race resembling large one-eyed prawns in novel “Camelot 30K” (1983); Leela: Leela, a one-eyed mutant character in the animated series “Futurama” (1999-2013); Likho: Likho, a one-eyed creature that’s the embodiment of evil fate and misfortune in Slavic mythology; Mike Wazowski: Mike Wazowski, round monster with one large eye in the film “Monsters, Inc.” (2001); Minions: Minions, one-eyed comic henchmen in the animation “Despicable Me” (2010); Monoids: Monoids, a one-eyed alien race in the “Doctor Who” episode "The Ark" (1966); Morris: Morris, a one-eyed mutant character in the animated series “Futurama” (1999-2013); Munda: Munda, a one-eyed mutant character in the animated series “Futurama” (1999-2013); Muno: Muno, a one-eyed creature in the children's television series “Yo Gabba Gabba!” (2007-Present); Naga: Naga, a one-eyed mutant in the film “World Without End” (1956); Ojáncanu: Ojáncanu, a one-eyed giant with long beard and red hair of Cantabrian mythology who embodies evil, cruelty and brutality; One-Eye: One-Eye, one of three sisters in the Brothers Grimm fairy tale "One-Eye, Two-Eyes, and Three-Eyes" (c. 1889); One-Eyed: One-Eyed, starfish-shaped aliens from the planet Paira in the “Warning from Space” (1956); One-Eyed Monster: One-Eyed Monster, the antagonist in the film “One-Eyed Monster” (2008); Orb: Orb, a one-eyed Marvel Comics super-villain, the primary adversary of Ghost Rider; Psoglav: Psoglav, a one-eyed dog-headed monster in Serbian mythology; Purple People Eater: Purple People Eater, a one-eyed creature in the song “Purple People Eater” (1958); Ravage: Ravage, a one-eyed panther-like Decepticon in the film “Revenge of the Fallen” (2009); Sauron: Sauron, the eponymous arch-villain of “The Lord of the Rings” (1954-1955), often manifests as 'the Eye' in Peter Jackson's adaptations of Tolkien's work; Scaroth: Scaroth, a one-eyed time-travelling alien in the “Doctor Who” episode “City of Death” (1979); Sgt. Psyclopps: Sgt. Psyclopps, the one-eyed guitarist for the costumed comedy punk band The Radioactive Chicken Heads; Sheldon Plankton: Sheldon Plankton, a one-eyed creature in “SpongeBob SquarePants” (1999-Present); Shuma-Gorath: Shuma-Gorath, a giant eye with tentacles, in the Marvel comics universe; Starro the Conqueror: Starro the Conqueror, a one-eyed supervillain in DC Comics; Suezo: Suezo, a one-eyed, one-footed breed of monster in video game/anime series “Monster Rancher” (1997); Tepegoz: Tepegoz, a one-eyed ogre in Oghuz Turkish epic Book of Dede Korkut; The Wicked Witch of the West: The Wicked Witch of the West, a one-eyed witch from "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz" (1900); Vaati: Vaati, a one-eyed creature from the “Legend of Zelda” (1986-2014); Waddle Doo: Waddle Doo, a one-eyed creature from Nintendo game franchise “Kirby” (1992-2014); Wenlock and Mandeville: Wenlock and Mandeville, the one-eyed mascot from the London 2012 Olympics; Zargon: Zargon, a giant one-eyed monster in the role-playing game “Dungeons & Dragons” (1974-Present); and Zatar the Alien: Zatar the Alien, a one-eyed green alien in the MTV series “Celebrity Deathmatch” (1998-2007).

Fox of Greenland
Because Greenland is geographically shaped like the head of a fox, numerous references to foxes are found through mythology and popular culture. The word “Fox” (F+X) acronymically and/or consonantly equates to “Double Cross North” or “Pi kills” as Pi is an acronym for Greenland. The idiom “sly as a fox” is indicative of the Greenland’s behavior while the term “fix” is slang for “fox”, meaning to make right, firm, stable, or stationary. Corporate entities (e.g., 20th Century Fox, Firefox, Fox News Channel, and FX) as well as films such as Disney’s “The Fox and the Hound” (1981) all contain fox-related titles and imagery. Interestingly, a white fox is depicted in the coat of arms of the Northwest Territories of Canada which border Greenland.

Ryan Ashville #sexist returnofkings.com

From comics, movies, anime, gaming, and now the more recent kids shows, feminists will use any kind of tactic to promote their evil. Stories like Rapunzel or The Sleeping Beauty have been a part of our childhood, teaching us about gender roles and the importance of them. Now they have been changed in various ways to suit modern women, giving them unrealistic expectations of what they can be. Here are nine characters that show how they have infiltrated entertainment.

Steven Universe

The show deals with an entire species that is genderless but has feminine traits (female human forms), Steven is a male protagonist that is not masculine in a lot of ways. Rather than being the strong fighter type, he acts through femininity despite being male. He cries for help from women rather than helping himself. The show contains trans, queer and homosexual characters which is typical for a show like this. They have women of different sizes and has quite a dark story line for a show aimed for children. Cartoon Network is now giving a way for brainwashing, glorifying obese women and unhealthy diets.

They even place the emphasis on disguised leftist concepts like:

Tolerance – Praising of everything non-white, non-male and non-heterosexual
Minority – non-whites, non-male and degenerates
Inclusiveness – Accepting everything non-white and degenerate
Emancipation – Disregarding rules made by conservative males

But despite all these teachings, SJWs bullied a Steven Universe artist to attempt suicide because she drew Rose (an obese female character) too thin. Hypocritical? Yes. It certainly has one of the most cancerous fanbases, consisting of bronies and white knights.

Wonder Woman

Not even girls want to be girls so long as our feminine archetype lacks force, strength, and power. Not wanting to be girls, they don’t want to be tender, submissive, peace-loving as good women are. Women’s strong qualities have become despised because of their weakness. The obvious remedy is to create a feminine character with all the strength of Superman plus all the allure of a good and beautiful woman.”

– William Moulton Marston, in a 1943 issue of The American Scholar.

Comics publisher Max Gaines asked him to create a new superhero for their comics, to fill the void he felt existed with something new. The creator knew that he wanted his hero to embrace love over violence, and to value peace over war. He assumed that women value love and peace. He valued independent, educated, and unconventional women.

Wonder Woman remains a feminist icon 75 years after her creation, because she symbolizes the idea of female domination. According to NY Post, Wonder Woman was not ‘feminist’ enough for Social Justice Warriors, because SJWs and feminists are never happy with anything in society until white men are silenced. Most wonder woman comics were terrible, but the media keeps pushing it on readers that they HAVE to give in.

BatGirl

Buffy the Vampire Slayer creator Joss Whedon is allegedly a woke male feminist ally. He’s a mangina allegedly known for directing “strong female characters”. His characters are unrealistic as women simply can never be tough. He cares about fake women’s issues like the pay gap and the alleged success of lady Ghostbusters. Joss is directing Batgirl, the story about a super heroine who is basically Batman but a woman. Currently he’s facing back-lash on Twitter, but in smaller amounts due to more and more people accepting these kind of reboots.

Overwatch

This game is tainted by women who blame their problems on men. Basically, every character in Overwatch has different victory pose animations that a player can unlock and choose from. And for the time-traveling character Tracer (one of the female characters in the game), her victory pose gives players a wonderful view of her buttocks, clad in skin-tight leggings. Obviously, if men are enjoying something there must be feminist intervention, so Blizzard changed her appearance and stated:

We’ll replace the pose. We want *everyone* to feel strong and heroic in our community. The last thing we want to do is make someone feel uncomfortable, under-appreciated or misrepresented. Apologies and we’ll continue to try to do better.

Women expose themselves to men in conventions, and when they are assaulted they complain that “men should respect women,” even when their own clothes were designed to attract men. But when a character in a video game wears skimpy clothing, there is an outright backlash against it. Overwatch is even taking strides to be LGBT inclusive. This marks the end of straight white man in entertainment.

Wandering Son

Wandering Son follows two fifth graders who do not identify with the genders they were assigned at birth. Shuichi Nitori identifies as a girl, and Yoshino Takatsuki identifies as a boy. This series marks the end of an era, modern anime has come to suit feminist tastes. The rest is pretty self explanatory.

Splash

The 80s film, starring Tom Hanks and Daryl Hannah, is set for a reboot with Channing Tatum starring as the “merman”. The original Splash was about a man, Allen Bauer (Hanks), who falls in love with the mermaid (Daryl Hannah) who rescued him when he was a boy. Their relationship is hampered somewhat by the fact that the mermaid (who later names herself Madison) has to return to the sea after just a few short days, and also by the deranged scientist determined to prove that merpeople are real by throwing water at her.

Since the announcement, many feminists have been celebrating the gender swap on social media – particularly Tatum’s casting as a merman as some kind of feminist victory… but why? Because of the casting of a white, straight male in a role that was originally held by a woman. Hollywood’s content has become more man-hating than ever before. Seeing men in feminine roles is a way of brainwashing men to be submissive and less masculine.

Gender swapping is fast becoming a fail-safe way for Hollywood to shut up anyone who kicks off about equality without actually having to write anything new: Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, Sleeping Beauty, 101 Dalmatians, Ghostbusters. All these films have either been made or are in the works and all of them have some kind of “feminist twist”. I’ve seen these gender bends in anime too, although no one seems to notice because anime gender bending is normalized.

Undertale

Your character is non-ambiguous (genderless) and non-white, which one could assume it is Asian or Mexican. They never refer to you as “him” or “her”. Despite having a small amount of characters, it managed to include homosexual relationships and a transgender robot. There are more homosexual couples than their opposite counterparts, and both the prominent female characters break out of gender roles. Undyne being the best fighter in the underground, another unrealistic feminist expectation that women can be better than men.

Do you see where “progressiveness” in gaming is really heading? Because the game pushes “progressive propaganda”. One of the major themes of the game that people have been gloating about is the notion that gay relationships are wonderful and perfect, straight relationships are doomed, diversity is strength, promoting inter-species romantic relationships, and it’s primarily because of this thematic content that the game gets praised. That is why Tumblr is spamming the votes, and the media is circle-jerking over the game. Nearing the end of the game I dawned upon the similarities of this game and Steven Universe. There’s nothing particularly special about the game except for discreetly lecturing you about homosexuality and political correctness.

Sailor Moon

It redefined the “magical girl” genre in its native Japan and its overseas influence has shown up in girl-power shows like The Powerpuff Girls and is the definition of a feminist anime. Haruka and Michiru, the series’ Sailor Uranus and Neptune, were a lesbian couple who helped girls around the world come to terms with their sexuality (lesbian propaganda). The series also makes a point of looking down on femininity, by showing how the less feminine girls have trouble coping with gender roles, like how Makoto learned to cook because she was teased for being a tomboy.
Though, I somewhat find it astonishing that the creator of the site anime feminist doesn’t care about “fanservice”, which is short softcore porn scenes, it occured to me because they know about the female supremacy in anime.

Life Is Strange

The creators of the game met with resistance to make the protagonist female. It’s a story about a girl named Max who learns that she can time travel. Life is Strange are some of the few games that are telling women’s untold stories in ways that make it seem as if women have it harder.

It’s simply a game made to exaggerate and show how cruel men can be to women (almost every man in the game is either a loser or a woman beating trash). It attempts to lecture you and say things like “these men need to be in check” whenever it finds the chance to. This game was published by SQUARE ENIX who also published Tomb Raider. Why is it that those people who push equality so much then decide to make a game where it’s about the girl, never around the male?

Conclusion

Modern entertainment is becoming more about social justice than hardware, software, story, gameplay, or animation, while we get to endure feminists complain about everything they don’t like, ruining entertainments we were once able to enjoy.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

CM asks if we can put together a rating system for Christian books. I think this is a good idea, although I think it bears some discussion on the best way to do that.

My thought is something similar to the SJW review of games system might be useful, with zero being the perfect score of containing nothing that would be objectionable to the Christian AND containing genuine and explicit Christian elements. There is a difference, after all, as Misty of Chincoteague is entirely unobjectionable, but it has no Christian content per se.

Let's consider some possible point factors, beginning with those that would likely be more or less acceptable to most Christian parents, but are potentially indicative of religious or ideological problems:
contains no genuine and explicit Christian element +1
exhibits unconventional Christian theology +1
characters demonstrate disrespect for peers or parents +1
an animal or major character dies +1
contains suggestions of physical violence +1

Then there are the elements that will be objectionable to the more conservative families:
contains squishy Disney-style "moral" messages +2
contains direct descriptions of physical violence +2
features indirect sexual themes +2
contains egregious or saintly minority characters +2
features aggressively "pro-science" themes +2
contains euphemistic swearing +2

Followed by those elements to which most parents will not want to expose their children:
contains openly atheist characters +3
contains detailed and gleeful portrayals of physical violence +3
features PG-13 sex scenes +3
advocates left-liberal political or ideological positions +3
contains light and occasional swearing +3
Features emotionally devastating scene +3

And then the completely unacceptable:
contains openly atheist or anti-theist messages +5
mocks Christianity +5
sadistic horror and physical violence +5
features pornographic sex scenes or romanticizes adultery +5
features homosexual and other sexually deviant characters +5
contains a considerable quantity of vulgarities and obscenities +5

Now, it is important to keep in mind that a novel can contain absolutely every element here and still be a Christian novel. What makes a novel Christian or not depends upon its intrinsic recognition that Jesus Christ (or some fictional facsimile therein), is the Lord and Savior of Mankind.

A Throne of Bones scores a lot of points, Book Two will score even more. But they are not books for children; I haven't let my own children read them. Every parent has to draw their own line, but it would certainly be useful to have a large database at Castalia House where books could be rated. For example, The Lord of the Rings would rate about a 5 of 65. A Throne of Bones would rate 30. A Game of Thrones would rate 55. I think anything over 15 should be considered unacceptable to most parents.

There is considerable room for improving the system, and I would welcome suggestions as well as the rating of various books.

John Derbyshire #racist vdare.com

Part Two of my answer: Jews are white, Asians are not, and while any overclass is resented, a racially distinctive overclass is resented more than one that barely looks any different from the resenters.

Anti-Semites know this; that's why they put out drawings of the hunch-backed, hook-nosed cartoon Jew when they want to inflame anti-Jewish feeling. It makes the Jew plainly a different race.

Part Three of my answer: even under the current covert quotas, Asian Americans are enrolled at elite colleges in numbers far above their five percent share of the U.S. population.

Yes, they're being held down: on a strictly meritocratic basis their numbers would be much higher yet, because of the arithmetic of those distribution tails. Still, strictly measured by demographic proportionality, they're high.
So yes, we were importing an overclass a hundred years ago. Elite universities dealt with the issue by fudging and chicanery—just as they are dealing with this repeat performance.

There are some key differences, though. Jews are white, which makes things easier to fudge.

Also, the high IQ of Ashkenazi Jews is more verbal than visuo-spatial, leading to that dominance in the shaping of opinion.
Asian Americans, by contrast, are much more visible as a group. And their high IQ is more visuo-spatial than verbal, giving us more engineers and scientists, fewer writers, lawyers, comedians, movie and newspaper moguls.

But in both cases, non-Asian gentiles get squeezed. We un-squeeze blacks and Hispanics with Affirmative Action, but that just squeezes white gentiles even more.
Under our current state ideology, the orthodox approach to that hovers somewhere between "Who cares?" and "Serve them right!"

Whether that ideology can be sustained going forward through the 21st century, is an interesting question.

Second point main point raised by readers: any merit-based immigration system imports an overclass.

I agree. Consider for example India. The mean IQ of that country is 82. The mean IQ of Indians in the U.S.A., on the other hand, is 106—higher than the mean for white gentile Americans.

So there's an overclass we've imported … from a low-IQ population.

The same applies to Africa. The mean IQ in black Africa is 70, which is very low. Assuming a normal distribution with mean 70 and standard deviation 15, Microsoft Excel tells me that only 0.0032 percent of the population is higher than 130 IQ.

That's a teeny-tiny percent; but there are an awful lot of black Africans: 1.2 billion is the latest number I've seen. Point zero zero three two percent of 1.2 billion is 38,000. Every one of those 38,000 very-smart Africans is applying for a U.S. student visa.
Caribbean blacks are, for complicated reasons, somewhat smarter than black Africans. Add them into the mix and we're importing a small black overclass.
Is this something we should be bothered about? We-e-ell … there are contrary factors to consider.

Under the present regime of chain migration, for example, all those smart Indians and Africans can bring in their way-less-smart siblings, brides, parents, and even cousins. You could argue that long-term that evens out the mix.

There's also regression to the mean. The offspring of these high-IQ immigrants will regress towards their population mean — although not all the way to it, or else Natural Selection wouldn't work. Given the likelihood of assortative mating, in fact — smart immigrants marrying other smart people — regression all the way back to the population mean is highly improbable, even after many generations.

So, no, this is not a great issue. It is an issue, though — an issue that lurks behind all the happy talk about a merit-based system of immigration.

The first time America imported an overclass, we did so accidentally. When that Great Wave of Ashkenazi Jews came in after 1881, we had only the vaguest ideas about population differentials in intelligence and personality. Psychometry as a quantitative science was just getting started.

Now we understand much more, and can make better decisions. If we import a new overclass today, we'll be doing it deliberately. We know enough to not do it.

And any overclass we import now will be nonwhite. That follows just from the balance of races in the world being much different than it was 100 years ago.

If you're a nonwhite who doesn't like white people, you are fine with that. If you're a white person living in one of the globalist-bubble districts — big coastal cities, college towns — you may think it's no big deal, we can all get along.

The rest of us are shaking our heads.

BoxcarJack #conspiracy forum.prisonplanet.com

Quote from: vCFy7W3SFb on June 18, 2009, 07:13:18 PM
"Investigators said they also found a notebook in the car with handwritten notes saying, "The Holocaust is a lie. Obama was created by Jews. Obama does what his Jew owners tell him to do. Jews captured America's money. Jews control the mass media.""

Was there a copy of the Koran on the dashboard too? (Like the 911 planted evidence) And a book called "How to Kill" with mapquest directions to the museum? (The Koran would be replaced by "the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.")

The whole von Brunn scenario fits the M.O. of an agency concoction from start to finish. A complete array of evidence pointing to all the right hot buttons to demonize the right and conspiracy theorists. They probably even wrote the press releases beforehand to save time.

The child porn just pushes it over the top, pointing to an intelligence set-up. Hell, why not hit the trifecta and promote internet 2 while they're at it. I bet 90% of online child porn users are cops in sting operations. Everyone hates child porn, stopping it is such an unassailable noble cause. It's a major, red flag calling card IMO. They don't know when to stop setting the scene. Trace von Brunn back and see who was really pulling his strings. He was no doubt under heavy duty mind control.

theicarlyangel #fundie comments.deviantart.com

thanks to them, I call myself homophobic because of how mean and nasty they are. One of them sent me a gay porn fanfiction and I was disgusted, but I dealt with him maturely and blocked him. Now I really DO consider myself homophobic because they're terrifying. As one a cartoon animated character once said, "You think the only people, are people who think like you."
Be proud of being homophobic/hating homosexuality. I get bullied too and been told to die in Hell. :XD: Idgafudge though. :D That just shows them how immature they can be. :) I am never teaching my kids homosexuality is okay, but I will also not let them bully the LGBT. The LGBT is just hurt and confused, if they would just stop being so mean and respect others' beliefs, that'd be great. And accepting a belief is not the same thing as supporting a belief.


[ "Do you know the reasons WHY the LGBT community is often hurt and confused?" ]

Bullied, kicked out of their homes, etc. So yeah, I do know. Why should that change my viewpoint that I don't agree with homosexual rights?

[ "Have you seen the way society treats homosexuals?" ]

No, but I surely do see how homosexuals treat non-supporters of homosexuality.

[ "They are constantly being shunned simply for their sexuality. I've heard of people who can't get a job just for being gay, gay children are being disowned and kicked out of their houses by their own parents, people have even been MURDERED just for the sake of being homosexual. The treatment towards REAL homosexuals is more than just "bullying the LGBT"." ]

Yes, and guess what? People who don't support homosexuality also get shunned simply because of their own belief and viewpoint AND on what they wish to follow. People also get fired from their jobs if they disagree with homosexuality which isn't fair either. Yes, in OTHER COUNTRIES. I did nothing. Don't bash me, someone that's innocent who doesn't wish death upon homosexuals. People have also sent me death threats for not support homosexuality. I guess being on both sides sucks.

[ "Homosexuals aren't just sensitive or butthurt about people having different beliefs. They're not being "mean"; they're biting back." ]

But I did NOTHING. Why bash someone innocent when I did NOTHING? Do you think every freaking non-support of the homosexuality club wishes death upon people or wants them to die or wants them to be bullied? NO. What they're doing is sick and wrong. (I'm talking about the whole biting back issue.) They are butthurt and sensitive when someone doesn't follow their ways, so yeah. There's a HUGE problem here.

[ "Now I'm not saying that I HAVEN'T seen any rabid or immature LGBT members, but the main reasons for homosexuals attacking the homophobes back is NOT simply because of the fact that they don't support LGBT; it's because they're fighting to earn the same rights for not being judged by their sexuality, since enough homophobes have already judged gays simply by their sexuality. Telling a gay person to respect a homophobe's opinion is basically like telling a black person to respect a racist's opinion." ]

A skin color is different from a sexuality. Don't even compare the two. -_- I do not wish for gay/lesbian coupling to be as equal as straight coupling. What REALLY needs to happen here is for the LGBT to fight back the bullies and search for someone who is open-minded and kind. Religious people also get bashed as well. Now, imagine if everyone followed the bible, THEN everyone get along as well, but NO. Not going to happen, want to know why? Because not everyone believes God exists, not everyone thinks he made our world. They believe in the Big Bang Theory. Sure, it would be easier if everyone got along, but not everyone is going to see eye-to-eye and you need to learn to cope with it.

[ I am sorry, but the fact that you are ONLY looking at rabid LGBT members who have attacked YOU on the Internet makes you sound biased. NOT ALL homosexuals attack homophobes for not following their beliefs, but you treat it like they do. You probably still missed my point that LGBT is MORE than just an "opinion". I brought up race with sexuality because... as I said, they are both a matter of human rights. You can't just simply tell gays to respect homophobes' opinions and get over it because "Oh everyone thinks differently and we should all respect each other's beliefs just fine and dandy like that", no. Then can we just simply say that blacks should respect racists' opinions or that women should respect sexists' opinions just because they think differently. ]

First of all, I don't need to be 'educated' when I obviously am going to disagree with you. No, I don't. Also I know that, and I know not all homosexuals are bad and they actually accept me for me. No, a sexuality is NOT human rights. Yaoi and Yuri is wrong and it will forever BE wrong. You may think whatever you'd like, go on. You've got a choice to be gay or not, I don't think they should be as accepted as straight couples because homosexuality IS wrong. I don't know why you bring racism into something that is gay. I don't know enough about racism to debate about that so I am going to leave you be for someone else to argue with you.

[ Really? You're just going to let a serious issue slide like that? Being oppressed/disowned/killed over one little aspect means nothing to you? ]

Ummm... I'm gonna say, yes. Because hey, everyone's been through Hell and that's me included, but you gotta stay boss and move onwards and don't let people drive you down in the dirt. You gotta think happily and positively and whatever has been done has been done. I can't do anything about that. Do I think it's okay for them to be oppressed, disowned, and killed? No. Do I have to worry about it? No. Because I don't live where they are and I can't help them out when I am probably half-way across the world. Like someone said, ya gotta leave the past behind ya. It's not my fault it's still going on. No need to bash on me.

[ So you're basically saying an inferior group is not allowed to be equal as a superior group just based on their sexuality? Welp, I'm sorry, but that IS judging people by their sexuality, saying that homos don't deserve the same rights as straights. You are basically okay with oppressing human rights there. No, I disagree! ]

How on Earth is that judging someone on their sexuality?! JUST HOW? I don't understand your logic, what gave you that conclusion?! I NEVER said I want homosexuals to die and rot in Hell, seriously and that they should be treated like garbage, WHAT made you come to that conclusion? Are you that dense and close-minded or what? Agreeing with someone's rights is not the same thing as accepting someone for who they are.


[ Also, I have often seen you try to use "I hate homosexuality, but not homosexuals" as an excuse. That doesn't even make any friggin sense. It'd be like saying "I hate black skin color but I don't hate black people!" or "I hate vaginas but don't hate women for having them". Here's another reason I bring up sexism/racism to homophobia. Like different races with their skin color, homosexuals can NOT control their sexuality. They can't just wake up one morning and decide "Oh I want to be gay from now on!". Sexuality is a NATURAL aspect that people carry with them from birth or at a very young age. You can't change sexuality, and that is why most homosexuals hate homophobes. They are being oppressed for having a natural trait that they can't control, and that is another form of anti human rights. ]

Okay, first of all, it does make sense. It means I hate same-gender coupling and I could care less about it, but to people who like it or who are gay, then fine. I won't stop you. Be whoever you want. Give me one good reason why I should hate you over your sexuality. Don't you dare compare someone's skin color to a sexuality. Those are TWO different things. Look, I don't think racism is that much of an issue because from where I live, there's not much of it here... and anyways, loving someone versus a color of a skin are two completely different things. Sure, you can't help if someone has a skin color or if someone's gay, that's just who they are. It doesn't mean I hate them, it just means I would either hate their skin color or a sexuality. Just like if someone wore an outfit you personally don't like. You don't have to like it, it's their style and their choice. I for one don't hate anyone for being black/tan. It is not NATURAL. Okay, I can't change a sexuality, but what I can do is be against homosexuality. I am not supporting the idea to oppressed people. Seriously, how does someone NOT support homosexuality made you even come to that conclusion?

Ugh, I am done here. You're way too thick-headed for me. Go do something that makes you happy and positive. We are obviously gonna disagree here and nothing you say will change my mind and I will not change my beliefs just to please you. Have an awesome day and remember: Treat others the way you like to be treated.


[Also, regarding your last comment there; Just because you have not been oppressed it doesn't mean that you simply shouldn't care. There is a thing called empathy. If you could just put herself in a homosexual's shoes for once, you would know that being abandoned and killed just for being gay is not something you can just "think positively and get over with" about.]

I do care and I do feel bad for them, but I shouldn't worry about it. I should worry about myself and what needs to get done and what I can do to help make things a better place. Heck, I've been sexually abused since I was little, been bullied and harassed since the 3rd grade, and have gotten my heart broken. When people debate with me, my heart and liver hurts even more. It REALLY does. Which is why I tend to block people and think happily and positively and worry about myself first. I still need to worry about the work I need to get done and how am I going to succeed in life.

[ When you say that famous line 'treat others the way you want to be treated' , you need to understand that it also means that involves human rights as well. And that no one should be denied them. You wouldn't like your rights being taken away I'm sure. ]

Straight is normal and since two of the opposite gender can make a baby, I feel okay with that. I'm sorry, I disagree. Don't debate about me on this though, just please don't. I really think the LGBT should just stick up for themselves for once and call the cops. Maybe it's not easy, but I am here to help out whenever someone is needed. This involves NOT harming the innocent and shoving their beliefs down others' throats. Sorry, my mind has not changed and I don't want to debate about this.

AutisticSubhuman #fundie reddit.com

I believe that either inceldom is a worse fate than being raped, or they are two incomparable sufferings.

First, let's compare the two. Inceldom is the result of being a complete societal reject. It means everyone in the world either hates you, finds you sexually repulsive, or has no interest in you. Being an incel requires daily reflection on this fact because man is simply not meant to live this way. It is unlikely not experienced in this, women especially, can fathom this unique and painful hell. Being alone to the extent we are could be compared to actual torture inflicted upon the worst criminals in the world. Because of this Incels regularly cycle between the emotions of violent hate, severe depression, and abject fear. I can tell you there hasn't been a moment in my life for the past 5 years where I have felt a single positive emotion.

On the opposite side, unless you're a Josef Fritzl kid or a complete whore (will expand on this later), rape is a singular ordeal. I have no doubt that it's painful and traumatic, but its victims are able to wake up and know that their suffering is over and they just have to deal with the mental fallout. As an Incel, every day I wake up, I have to prepare myself that all I will experience is mental anguish and suffering and there is nothing I can do to stop this. Victims of rape are able to go on to live happy lives with partners after their ordeal. They are able to go out with friends and have fun. They are able to go to events, concerts etc. All of these little life experiences they have are denied to Incels. Rape victims at least know that they are desirable to society by something; their body. Incels feel completely useless to everyone on earth, no one cares about them for anything.

Secondly, Rape is far, far easier to prevent than Inceldom is. All you have to do to be an Incel is be born as a male without the traits to succeed socially in whatever arbitrary society you were born in. I was fated into Inceldom simply due to my genetics and never had any hope to escape it. Men may enter inceldom purely due to a single bad life choice, such as going to a private high school, not hitting on a certain goal, having an introverted youth etc.

On the contrary I would assume that around 90% of rape victims have brought upon themselves. Obviously children and those who were simply grabbed in alleyways have my pity, but these are a rarity of cases. Most rapes occur from the following two things: 1. Being a terrible judge of character and 2. Partaking in seriously dangerous behavior.

On the first type of rape, we live in a world where most of the rapes occur by someone a woman knows. This is because in sexually liberal societies such as ours women will always want to hang out with the "Bad boys" and who they view as dominant and cool but are in reality just lecherous creeps (moreso than any Incel could ever be.) Well, if they hang around these people and get raped then you have no pity in my book because there are plenty of decent men being ignored by society they could have chosen to hang with. If you sleep with dogs don't be surprised if you wake up with fleas.

On the second type of rape, I would argue that most of these are preventable because they are the result of another bad decision. For example, going out drunk to places where there will be many male strangers is obviously very dangerous behavior but feminists have taught society that it is "slut-shaming" to state this. This is the main reason why I think the whole "rape crisis" bullshit is overblown. If women truly feared and were broken by rape they wouldn't be willing to go out every Saturday night and end up in the beds of strangers. They would be too afraid to even engage in this behavior. The fact that they're willing to even risk it proves either rape is overblown in the amount of trauma it inflicts upon someone, or women are truly too stupid to see that B comes after A. Either way if there were a single thing I had to give up in life, even if it profoundly impacted the way in which my life is set up, I would be willing to do so in a heartbeat. That's how serious inceldom is to me. I would be willing to give up the internet, drugs, any type of my favorite food, if it meant a chance of finding love, intimacy and acceptance.

Finally, there are many resources available to women who have been raped. Rape crisis centers, tumblr blogs, online help sites, therapists etc. There are buildings in this world funded by taxpayer dollars for the sole sake of rape. What do Incels have to deal with their own issues? Nothing. Just a couple of small internet refuges scattered across the web, many of which have become invaded by the same normies that we have been rejected by. We have been systemically denied a public voice due to the fact we are social rejects, and every time we try to appeal for sympathy we are shut down by hateful demagogues who hurl insults like "Entitled", "Manchild" and "Loser" at us. Any small dose of sympathy we get from people outside our own circle is merely virtue signaling, these people just don't care about us at all and if they do all they feel is hatred.

Also, seeing as though how the main issue to deal with rapes is just the mental fallout, meaning many traditional methods of mental healthcare are effective in treating it such as therapy and psychiatry. Getting through these issues with a therapist is easy and the fact that you have your voice not denied, but elevated by society, makes coming back from being a rape victim a much more seamless process. Fixing Inceldom through therapy and psychiatry is a ludicrous goal, to the extent that we ban anyone who suggests this. Therapy does not help incels because mental health professionals are unable to fix the root causes of our situation, being societal rejects with wasted youths. They cannot change reality. They can only make us cope with what is a lifetime prison sentence, which is bullshit.

This post is getting long now but I hope you read it all. It is important for this topic to come up because it proves how pathetically easy a woman's life is, and how utterly incapable they are of fathoming our situation. Rape, the "worst thing that can happen to a woman" is a situation that is completely benign comparable to the horrors, the pure unending agony of Inceldom. We are broken souls, rejected at every level, and destined to die alone without a single soul to share our lives with. Don't downplay how we feel, because I guarantee you that you can't grasp with what this life feels like unless you've experienced it directly.

That said I welcome all criticism and debate. I am a man, meaning that there are some realities of rape that I do not understand. Though from careful analysis it seems like inceldom is way worse than being raped.

Matt Barber #fundie worldnetdaily.com

[article: Is Wikipedia wicked porn?; Online encyclopedia proudly posts graphic sexual images kids can see]

Wikipedia, the online "free encyclopedia" written and edited by its users that contains 9 million articles in 253 languages, now includes detailed photos of nude homosexual men engaging in sex acts and a variety of other sexually explicit images and content.

One Wikipedia entry states, "A fluffer is a hired member of the crew of a pornographic movie whose role on the set is to sexually arouse the male participants prior to the filming of scenes requiring erections."

A photo of two nude men having anal sex on a bed, and a "fluffer" handing them a towel, is shown to the right of the entry.

Matt Barber, a constitutional law attorney who serves as Concerned Women for America's policy director for cultural issues, expressed outrage at Wikipedia's decision to allow sexually explicit images.

"Children use Wikipedia all of the time for reportsfor school, and this stuff is not just pornography, this is hard-core pornography," he said. "Much of it may even be in violation of our nation's obscenity laws."

[click link for full article]

murieljcompton #fundie christianforums.com

[From a subforum on Christian Forums dedicated to 'Christian Persecution']


If you are familiar with the website of Yahoo, which I am sure you are, you may be disturbed to know that Yahoo promotes a homosexual lifestyle to children!

If you weren't aware, Yahoo allows users to create what are known as "avatars." They are animated cartoon characters that can be made to represent the user. They offer many different clothes and backgrounds with which you may accessorize your avatars. I was shocked and appalled to discover that you may dress your avatar in clothing and accessories that are homosexually-themed! Your Yahoo avatar may wear a T-shirt that says "Gay Pride." Your Yahoo avatar may hold a rainbow homosexual flag. Your Yahoo avatar may even be placed upon a background of a "Gay Pride" rally. But if you look through the other choices, you will find that there is not one option to dress these avatars in Christian-themed clothing. There are no T-shirts that proclaim love for Jesus. There are no Christian flags. And there are no church backgrounds! But it is perfectly acceptable for them to promote an immoral lifestyle such as homosexuality to the millions of minors that visit Yahoo on a daily basis!

I encourage all Christians to immediately cut off any ties they may have with the Yahoo website. I will be redirecting my web-based email to G-mail. I have unsubscribed from all Yahoo groups of which I was a member. If you have web hosting through them, find another one immediately! It is quite obvious to me that Yahoo has all the business they need from the homosexual community. Let us show them that they don't need any from the Christian community. I will be praying for the administration of the Yahoo website and will only return to Yahoo when these offensive items are taken down!

Anna Rountree #fundie 64.71.77.248

Jesus held me at arm’s length, studying my face. He smiled, turned, and led the way toward the building.

The atmosphere in the valley was red as though the building was catching the light from a distant forest fire. It was eerie. It cast long shadows across the valley.

The shadows traveled up the building until they reached two enormous black marble dragons on top. These dragons were facing each other with their wings uplifted and touching like the cherubim over the mercy seat.

The building was a mockery of the ark of the covenant. It was deathly dark as if it were made from antimatter. The black marble exterior was wet, and the overbearing humidity made it difficult to breathe.

Shadow Warriors

Thousands of soldiers were standing shoulder to shoulder on all four sides of the building. They wore an ancient style of armor whose design I had never seen. These warriors were camped around the building, just as the Levites were instructed to camp around the desert tabernacle. None of them moved when we passed through their numbers, however.

“Why?” I wondered. I glanced down their ranks to see if I could discern the reason for their inaction. The faces within the helmets were shadow. But their eyes tracked us.

I suddenly remembered how the two angels that were sent to rescue Lot had temporarily blinded the men of Sodom. Jesus, I thought, must have rendered these demons inert. They were alert. But they were incapable of action. They held their ranks like clay soldiers buried with early Chinese emperors.

The Approach

After passing through most of the ranks of the soldiers, Jesus approached the building. The structure had the appearance of a gigantic mausoleum. As we drew near, I could see that the black marble dragons were breathing. So were the black marble monkeys that formed a decoration around the top of the building. These leered down at us.

The massive double doors unlatched as we approached. They opened slowly. Each door was of great weight. They pictured satan ’s supposed conquests. They were executed in bronze relief and were similar to the doors of European cathedrals that often depict the life of Christ.

Within

The doors opened outwardly to give us entry to a large, windowless room. The smell within the room was odious. The room, like the valley, seemed lit by distant fires. My eyes traveled up to a heavy raised cornice. It formed a crown around the top of the room. A text was written upon it in an ancient language of wedges and triangles.

Jesus waved His hand, and the lettering changed so that I was able to read the inscription. The text proclaimed satan ’s five “I wills” with which he intended to vault himself above the throne of God and crown himself king of the universe. I shuddered.

Hanging upside down from this cornice were half-female, half-batlike demons—the Lilith, the vampire demons that hunt at night. They were repugnant. I dropped my gaze and saw the reason for the stench in the room. Bat guano.

On Display

Display tables flanked either side of the room. These were covered with what seemed to be black velvet. The objects on display were shining with light from within. The objects were beautiful, not because of exquisite workmanship nor because they were encrusted with jewels. Instead, they seemed to have some beauty bestowed upon them by God. They were His, for His people had used them. Now they sat on display like war mementos. I quickly glanced over the tables in astonishment. This was a trophy room.

Stolen From God

Each article was labeled with a clay marker. The same wedges and triangular-shaped writing was on these markers as was on the cornice. Again, Jesus waved His hand. The language changed so that I could read the labels.

On display were the just measure, Miriam’s tambourine, Bezalel’s renderings for the workers (of the patterns given to Moses on the mount), the widow’s bowl, various musical instruments of ancient design, and on and on. We passed article after article that had been used by God in some extraordinary way and then stolen from Him. I could only suppose that these had been taken into the enemy camp because of the sins of God’s people.

I was heartened, however, by the empty spaces on the tables. The labels showed articles that apparently had been rescued to be used by God’s people again. Goliath’s sword that was used by David was missing. David’s harp had been retrieved. There was an empty space where once a banner had been displayed. As we neared the rear of the trophy room, I saw a white embroidered robe on a black clothes stand. It was luminescent. satan had displayed it by itself, as if it were a prized acquisition.

The Fresco

Beyond this article on the rear wall was a vivid fresco.” Before the fresco burned black candles. The flickering lights from the candles seemed to give the fresco a life of its own.

The fresco began at its base with recounting after recounting of brutal tortures of some of God’s people. Those being tortured still seemed alive. The fresco was like none I had ever seen. It was similar to a hologram. Light from the candles caused the pictures to have progressive action, so that those suffering suffered again, with satan supposedly gaining the victory again and again. Barbarous.

The Throne of Skulls

My eyes traveled up this mountain of slaughter to about one-third of the way to the ceiling. Here the fresco began to depict a mound of skulls. This mound rose to a throne of skulls upon which sat the goat-like legs of a satyr.

The enthroned creature had the torso and arms of a human but the head and horns of a goat. In this goat/man's left hand was held a picture of the world. In his other hand was the location for two keys. The outline of the keys was still there, but the keys of death and of Hades had been removed from his hand.

The fresco vaulted up until it covered the first half of the ceiling like a frightful canopy. It was satan , goatlike, enthroned upon a mountainous pile of human skulls. He was gloating in sinister splendor. As God the Father is enthroned upon the praises of His people, satan is enthroned upon his murderous savageries and sadistic cruelties.

A chill ran through me. Flickering light from the black candles caused satan ’s face to move, seemingly to change before my eyes. His snake-like eyes glared at me.

The Embroidered Robe

Jesus touched my shoulder. I flinched. We began to walk toward the acquisition at the very back—the embroidered robe.

It was fall length with long sleeves. The design of the garment was simple. A man or woman could have worn it. Its richness lay in the embroidered work that was executed in white gold of exceptional purity The embroidery arose from the robe. The pattern was intricate and exceptionally beautiful. As I moved a little before the garment, all the colors within the radiance of the Father seemed to play across its surface.

The weight and thickness of the various gold threads seemed to symbolize attributes of the Lord. The robe reflected these as if they had been woven into the garment.

The Embroidery

I had no idea a garment could communicate that which was of the character of Christ. Still, I wanted to move slightly before the embroidery to ascertain what was woven into the fabric.

I received the impression of “a heart of compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience.” The garment also reflected “bearing with one another” and “forgiving each other.”’ The thread that had the greatest weight and was the most frequently used was “love.”

These were part of the character of Christ that Paul enumerated in Colossians 3:12—14. He had told the body of Christ alive at that time to “put on” this garment. If he had told them to put it on, they must have had it in their possession but were not wearing it. I gathered that sin had eventually allowed the garment to be taken from God’s children. Sad. We had great need of it.

Jesus spoke to me quietly. “The garment is for the soul and heart. It is an inner garment that becomes visible through actions, through decisions that effect unity [oneness in Christ].”

He continued, “I am the new, inner garment—others rather than self. The supreme Other is God [the Father] Himself—His rights, His needs, and His desires before all. I have purchased you for our Father. I have washed you and clothed you with garments of holiness and beauty, garments of salvation and righteousness. Anna, clothe yourself in Me—garments of salvation for the whole person [body, soul, heart, and spirit]. Clothe yourself in Me—attributes of righteousness that are beautiful to God [the Father].”

I turned back to look at the robe. It was exquisite. The Lord’s virtues woven into the garment had brought the body of Christ into “the perfect bond of unity.” Paul had said this. How we needed it now.

He continued, “The embroidered garment is to be worn by those who are the bride. It was handed down in our family. Those who were entering into fuller union with Me wore it. There is none like it. It belongs to our household.”

As I looked at the robe, I realized that to enter into a deeper relationship with Christ meant to enter into a deeper covenant with His body. The two are inseparable.

The Recovery

“Carefully listen to Me,” Jesus said softly. “I want you to remove the garment, then quickly climb onto My back.” Without hesitation He placed His hand on the top of the velvet clothes rack.

I did not have time to think. Instantly I obeyed and began to remove the robe. The more I disengaged the garment, the harder He pressed on the top of the rack. I supposed He was compensating for some weight of glory in it. He continued to press on the top of the rack as I folded the embroidered robe so that it could be carried.

When the garment had been secured, I looked at Jesus. He gave the flicker of a smile, winked at me, and then removed His hand from the rack.

The Escape

Screams, sirens, and alarms of all kinds immediately arose together. All restraints were removed from everything within this realm.

Quickly the Lord became the white Eagle. Nervously I scrambled onto His back.

The vampire bat demons unfolded their huge wings. Their eyes were bloodred. They hissed through their fanged mouths. They were deranged with fury.

The doors to the front of the trophy room began to close. The white Eagle had to fly with His wings perpendicular to the floor to pass through the narrow opening. I tightened my arms and legs around Him, pressing the robe between my flattened body and His back. We passed through the opening like a single unit. With searing screams everything—bats, monkeys, dragons, soldiers—wrenched awake.

It seemed as though everything in the corrupted stratum breathed down upon us in the chase—screeching, squalling, shrieking, a cacophony of blood-curdling sounds raised behind us. They were a frenzied juggernaut.

The marble dragons wrenched free from the top of the building with all the cracking and tearing that accompany a structure being torn apart. The black marble monkeys violently ripped free to join in the hunt. The Lilith and shadow warriors rabidly pursued. Whether hoofed, winged, clawed, flightless, or airborne, they pressed us. They were a murderous horde of frenzy and rage.

Quickly demons from elsewhere in the second heaven joined these in the chase. The whole second heaven sounded like one dangerous, wounded animal. The bone-chilling cries that went up from that place made my blood run cold. Horrific.

I clung to the white Eagle. It was a wild ride. Wild! … but exhilarating. I threw back my head, gulping air and laughing silently. Let them roar. That was all that it was, a roar. A show. I was with Jesus, and Jesus had won the victory! Let them roar!

Rainyiceberg #sexist reddit.com

How do you cope with living in this horrible male infested world? I hate how men and patriarchy are the cause of all evilness towards women, animals and the planet and yet nobody recognize it!!! My happiness is almost gone because I found out how horrible the prostitution and porn industry is, but everyday I see people who watch porn and some acquaintances talk about it (even females) like if it was normal and funny.

I feel so alone, I have no feminist friends in my country neither online and I think I will always be alone sorrounded by males and handmaidens and there's nothing I can do to change society on my own. Men have indoctrinated women into thinking their own oppression is sexy and normal, and some women even like BDSM and porn and their sexual desires are based on porn and not in what they really want because porn is all about pleasing the dick, not about female pleasure.

Men trained women to like being submissive and serve men sexually and women think they like that. Everyday I find out about more horrible things that men do to women, like the pedophile elite, the oppression in music and film industry, the rape culture, the horrible inhumane conditions of women and girls in many countries, men kill them for not having sons, for not wanting to be with them, for resisting abuse, they control every aspect of their lives, they kill baby girls, they force the abortion of baby girls, they deny education to girls and force actual female children to marry men, legally!

They mutilate our genitals, they call us witches they throw acid at us they see us as sexual holes to fuck, they sexually abuse us, they call themselves women bc they have a "lady brain", they want to have sex with their own daughters, they shame us for having sex, they indoctrinate us to think we are inferior with their religions, we always fear to be raped when we're alone, men control the political and economical elites, they are trafficking us to sex slavery, they exploit us in the most horrible ways and they have the society tell them it's ok for a man to go to a strip club but it's BAD for a woman to be a stripper and bad to be a prostitute, and it's not cool for a woman to go and see naked men dancing or hire a male prostitute, that's just for high class women before their wedding.

The hipocrisy and the oppression is so evident and yet everything is so normalized and nobody cares about it. Even feminists are defending porn and ignoring important issues. I am so tired. Sorry for the long rant and for the english if it's not correct, if anyone can tell me how do they cope, what do they do to feel better that will help a lot. Thank you.

biblicalgenderroles #sexist biblicalgenderroles.com

While most married men view porn you may directly contribute to your husband viewing it more by neglecting your physical appearance. If you gain an excessive amount of weight or fail to properly groom yourself or wear nice clothes your husband may look more to porn than he normally would for the feminine beauty that he is naturally designed to crave.

Even if you take great care about your physical appearance if you are harsh, critical, disrespectful or less than fully receptive to your husband’s sexual advances he may view more porn than he would have otherwise. Most women fail to realize that men do not view porn only because of the bodies of these women or the sex acts themselves. Many men also view porn because of the enthusiasm these women show toward sexually pleasing the man they are with.

Even if you as a Christian wife take great care of your appearance and you willingly and enthusiastically have great sex with your husband he may still look at porn. I refer you back to hard truth number 2 about men and their sexuality – men are designed by God with a capacity for polygyny. So this means even if your husband is thrilled with you in all these areas he will still be drawn to enjoy the view of a variety of women’s bodies.

Even if you deny most or all of the hard truths I have just stated the Bible nowhere gives you the right to deny you husband sex because is he doing something sinful. Remember that the same Bible which you believe says men viewing any kind of porn or thinking sexual thoughts of other women is wrong also says very clearly that a woman may not deny her husband sexually.

Even if you deny most or all of the hard truths I have just stated your husband is NOT accountable to you for his thought life or his actions. Even if you feel he is being disobedient to God in his porn use you are not his spiritual authority and you have no authority to confront him in this spiritual matter.

Alloya #ufo #magick #conspiracy #crackpot alloya.com

Magdalene

Mag -Magnetic dragon, the outer egg or skin or dome of our reality.

Da -Daat – gnosis the serpent around the tree.

Lene – land or plane of inertia – the middle plane or middle earth.

Magdalene, she is the great magnetic dragon surrounding the tree of life which creates the plane of inertia or what we call middle earth. Every electrical current creates a magnetic sheath around it similar to a light bulb, Magdalene she represents this torus field, she is the tree of life in the centre with the serpent or the Daat spiraling around like a tesla coil, which causes a magnetic egg or sheath to form around it. In the centre the plane of inertia is formed upon this we exist.

Speaking with EL ves

As you know there was a time before the sun and moon a time when we lived in a phosphorus world of inner green light, we bathed in the electromagnetic emerald waves of the great mother dragon and through her, we emitted green light. Our world was bathed in a green and purple light and Saturn was our only night light but much further away than it seems today. Our earth our Eden was not like the reality I find myself in now, it was without complete concreted features it was not so dense and pliable somehow. It was like jelly to us we could mould it with our thoughts and heart desires.

We did not have seven chakras like the humans we think we are today we only had three. One in the heart connecting to the constant shifting currants of the great mother dragon as she wrapped her emerald form as a protective sheath around our plane. One in the belly in a figure of eight connected to the root of this reality through the versica pisces . Our inner womb through which we birthed ourselves no need for parents a different kind of birth. Self generating were we. One on our crown worn with pride resembling a horns of a stag. Acting as an antenna connecting us to our kin in the stars.

The sun caused the fall of the elves .

Falling on the rainbow , sacrificing ourselves on the 7 colours of deadly sin. Or Sine. We passed through the eye of the needle and we began to divide. We passed through the throne of the Creator and began to manifest ourselves into bodies of earthy light. Throne is three angels or angles coming together to create a triangle in the heavens through which fractals are imploded to form geometric patterning which can carry consciousness into the lower levels and begin the manifestation or incarnation process. This three angled star lens is seen in the Orion Nebula a place on the firmament which has an opening or a window.

Random-animezing #homophobia random-animezing.tumblr.com

Some characters have no stated canon orientation like Elsa from Frozen . She never displays any kind of sexual/romantic attraction or interest to anybody of either gender. Her orientation is never stated either

That was kind of what I was getting at with the whole, “that’s just the label fans project onto them…[writers and fans] are getting less skillful and more out-of-touch with the intricacies of conversation and nonverbal human interaction while simultaneously getting caught up in identity checklists in just about everything they touch” thing.

You shouldn’t have to have it directly stated and spoon-fed to you, nor is it remotely healthy to be so concerned about a cartoon character’s sexuality. Go outside, get a hobby or skill, and quit sending me these stupid comments. They’re a colossal pain in the ass.


Most people–and most characters–are straight. Get over it. If you have to be told that, you need to seek professional help.

Eileen K. #fundie realjewnews.com

If this depravity continues, God will eventually pour His wrath down upon the USSA; not to say the liberal heterodox “churches who have sanctioned this depraved behavior.

Government officials are, indeed, a bunch of Godless hypocrites. They say they stand for “separation of church and state”; yet, they’ll gladly erect synagogues and pagan temples in defiance of God and stand shoulder to shoulder with enemies who mock Him.

For this, they’ll suffer the consequences of eternity in Hell, unless they return to Him and repent.

And, Br. Nathanael, thank you for pointing out this Jewish pushing of sexual depravity in the USSA, with the Judiciary being the worst perpetrator for not standing up for the Constitution and religious liberty.

The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion as well as of speech, the press, and assembly; yet, the Courts have rammed sexual deviancy down the population’s throats, even though the majority have voted against it.

The churches are also at fault for not standing up to the Judiciary and defending religious liberty.

little jeremiah #fundie freerepublic.com

Already sexual attacks on men by men have increased tremendously [in the military]. Already homos are on the march, chaplains are silenced, it’s just the beginning; it will get much, much worse unless and until it goes back to “Ask, and if the answer is wrong, out the damn door!”

Homosexuals DO NOT BELONG IN THE MILITARY and there is so much evidence to prove this that only those pushing a depraved agenda ignore it.

TN88 #homophobia #transphobia stormfront.org

I am afraid of how fast this agenda is growing, especially transgenders. 2 years ago I couldn't even imagine going to school with one, but now their's about 4 of them at my school. The youth is constantly pushed propaganda through social media and tv.


Everyday on Snapchat I see on discover stories filled with pro-lgbt ****, and now we're living in a world where companies like disney are putting openly gay characters on kids shows and cartoons. It's only gonna get worst, not to mention schools are promoting it too.

I feel awful for the next generations that are going to be surrounded by this. I plan on teaching my future kids to stay away from propaganda, and possibly putting them in private or charter school that doesn't have mentally-ill kids.


What are some of your thoughts on this?

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

This is what's waiting for you when you 'leave inceldom' JFL

image

(Binarycode1995)
You're not entitled to have sex with your wife. You should behave and pay all the bills while she enjoys her time with Jamal and tyrone.

(FeministAsFvck)
More than anything in this universe, women hate the fact that ugly men are sexual beings

(COPE_OR_ROPE)
Truth, any man who's had a female "friend" can relate. They see you as a castrated asexual being that had no penis, and if you ever try to escape the friendzone you are then declared a creep who only cared about sex and didn't really want to be her friend.

(justforlulzandkeks)

if you want to have sex with your wife you're abusive and ent1tled

What did the mentally ill whores mean by this?

What sub is this from, OP?

Gendercritical

That's what I was expecting

Those whores are completely insane, but nobody gives a shit about them. Only when they talk shit about trannies do ledditors get butthurt, but hating men is okay, jfl

([deleted])
They're literally female incels, but get away with it. It's probably because women have no real power lol. They ain't shit and can't do shit. Let them whine in the arms of their bulldyke sisters.

(fuckredditxxx)
In first world countries they most certainly do. Reveal yourself you cucked coward.

(WaitingOutABan)
The only thing I'll ever concede to the feminists is that their Gender Critical/radfem wing is fucking hilarious. If a serious radfem were to pretend to be satirical, she would win a Grammy for Best Comedy Album

(bangalorean-dude)
Yeah, I knew it. GC isn't known for logic or rationality.

(bigantennaemay1)
Estrogen isn't conducive to logic or reason.

(Zippo-Cat)
When your wife doesn't want to fuck you, you're sexually abusing her

unreal

(quercusp)
What is presented here is pure sexism:

„whiny entitled martyr me“, „sexually abusive husband“

Men‘s needs for tenderness and intimacy are ridiculed. Imagine the „war of the worlds“ provoked if women‘s sexuality would be dragged into the dirt in such a way and this in a female dominated sub!

(whatdoinamethiscrap)
Jesus fucking Christ. This is unreal.

Yes, they’re right that that sun is basically incels who manage to ascend though.

Porn sick depravity? Martyrs? Sexually abusive?! They’re married. Marriage is supposed to be a union of love, and love of course include both parties having enthusiastic sex with each other. That’s what it’s supposed to be, but I’m not naive enough now to think that that’s what it is today.

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

NOTE: This was posted not on Lady Checkmate's "Faith & Religion" channel but instead the "news" channel she runs on Disqus.

(Commenting on story "The lies gays want you to believe: "Consenting Adults," but what about the children?"):

Lady Checkmate:

Myth 1: Homosexuality is only between consenting adults....ignore the children at the parades and all night drag shows.

Myth 2: There are no homosexual pedophiles: all pedophiles are straight, even if they rape children of the same sex. (They ignore the single adults as well as the married gay couples who rape children of the same sex and then attempt to explain away their depravity as if their pedophilia is ok because they just can't control themselves and often accuse the children of seducing them.

Children are being exploited, sexualized, groomed, abused, and introduced to homosexual sexual play and adults are allowing it because they're afraid to offend a group of adults who are targeting children.
Consider actions and events like those currently happening: an eight-year-old drag queen performing for a group of adult homosexuals, gay parades where children are exposed to adult nudity, S&M, simulated sex acts, etc., Canada passing a law that would remove children form their parents if the parents don't support the gay life style, the 40/50 year-old drag queen who put on a sexually-charged performance/crawling on the floor and flicking his tongue at an elementary school's talent show in lingerie, the gay "couple" who raped elementary and middle school boys as a "couple", etc. and note that under normal circumstances they would be illegal.

rev2000:

LC, it is fear mongering without any scientific or common sense substantiation. Fear mongering feeds on those who indeed, are most vulnerable through ignorance. They are easily "led" by other insecure individuals. There is no correlation between homosexuality and pedophilia . . .in fact it is the opposite. There is a correlation, however, between religious rigidity and skewed sexuality issues including pedophilia and child molestation. I'm sorry people are so needlessly fearful and life is so burdensome. We pray for them and their lack of trust in the Lord.

http://mental-health-matters.com/profile-of-a-pedophile/

Are primarily (but not always) male, masculine, better-educated, more religious than average, in their thirties, and choose jobs allowing them greater access to children.
Are usually family men, have no criminal record, and deny that they abuse children, even after caught, convicted, incarcerated, and court-ordered into a sex offender program. The marriage is often troubled by sexual dysfunction, and serves as a smokescreen for the pedophile’s true preferences and practices.

Lady Checkmate:

You are an arrogant fool professing himself to be wise.
You put alot of stock into college degrees (mocking red necks/hill billies/southern blacks/etc.). (edited) What you need is common sense, humility and a heart to seek and obey God (and to protect children).
I rarely agree with you, obviously, but this time your advocating for child rapists is too much to ignore. I do not value the thoughts nor opinions of pedophile apologists and you will answer to God for your lies and abuse against children.
*Do not ever comment to me again. Move on. I do not value your opinion and will not interact with you as a human being.
Anyone who protects and defends child rapists deserves nothing.
DO NOT EVER COMMENT TO ME AGAIN. Children are OFF LIMITS HERE.

Janet Boyne and Others #fundie gospelherald.com

The creators of the hit animated Nickelodeon show "The Legend of Korra" have confirmed that the show's main heroine, Korra, and another female character named Asami, are in love with one another. Some parents have criticized the network for the decision, saying it was inappropriate to bring such a political and controversial subject onto a children's TV program.

In the final moments of the show's season finale on Friday night, Korra and Asami "held hands, turned and gazed at each other lovingly while romantic music played, and walked off together into the bright light of the Spirit World," reports the Daily Beast.

Although there was nothing explicitly sexual about the scene, subsequent Tumblr posts by the show's writers, Michael Dante DiMartino and Bryan Konietzko make it clear that the two characters were intended to be gay.

While the move has been praised for "exposing positive LGBT representation" by numerous media outlets, some parents feel that Nickelodeon exploited children as a means of winning the national debate.
"It is disturbing to me, because my 10 year old daughter has loved "Legend of Korra" from the beginning," said Ruthie Townsend of Nashville, TN.

"The show includes so many good lessons for children, like bravery, selflessness, and friendship. It's just very sad that the creators had to push their agenda on impressionable children."

"Really?! In a children's show? If they didn't want to push the heterosexual agenda then they should also not push the homosexual one," another commenter named Joy Ogbonna wrote.

"Sorry but this ending to a children's show leaves a sour taste in my mouth."
Janet Boynes, former lesbian and founder of Janet Boynes Ministries, warns that the gay community is attempting to indoctrinate young children by "normalizing" homosexual relations via television shows.

"Let me say this in plain English: The gay community wants to indoctrinate an entire generation of American children with pro-homosexual propaganda and eliminate traditional values from American society. Their ultimate dream is to create a new America based on sexual promiscuity in which the values you and I cherish are long forgotten."

She encourages Christian parents to "unite in our efforts and become the voice God would have us be."

"When you know better, you do better," she writes.

"How can we, as Christians, get our message out that we can be transformed through the power of Jesus Christ? For all you naysayers, I am not going away. We need to get off our blessed assurance, stop running scared and stand up for righteousness. As Scripture teaches, "You love righteousness and hate wickedness" (Ps. 45:7, NKJV)."

Mack Major #fundie edendecoded.com

Many of you cannot move on with the person you are with, and have a fulfilling relationship because you are still haunted by the sex of one of your exes.

Maybe more than one. You are literally haunted by sex! This unnatural soul tie is preventing you from properly loving the man or woman you are with. And it's a threat to the current well-being of your relationship.

Whenever you exit a former relationship that was sexually physical, you must go through a sex purge prior to entering into a new relationship. You have to purge your mind and soul, as well as your physical body. Or else you'll remain stuck to the past and tethered to past relationships.

Some of you were with people that performed sexually like porn stars. You were so heavily driven by lust that sex with that person became like a physical addiction for you. You basically had a porn-like sexual relationship. Each sexual encounter was like making your own movies. The problem with this is that those people on screen are actors. Realistically speaking no man or woman does things the people in porn flicks do on a consistent basis. It's not even physically healthy to do those things.

That stuff is for the sexual entertainment of those without knowledge of God, and those who are estranged from Jesus Christ. And if you really knew what those sexual acts were and where many of those positions come from, or what they really did, you wouldn't want to do them.

Sex is spiritual. And many of those pretzel twisting sexual positions are really physical body mantras that summon spirits from the netherworld to enter into the bodies of those practicing those positions.

It's just like yoga positions: those aren't just exercise moves or complex stretches. Each yoga position is an actual prayer to a Hindu god or deity. And when that spirit sees someone 'getting into position' it comes as requested.

The same applies to what I call 'porn-sex.' 90% of that stuff you've seen on porn is NOT normal! But I'm getting off track here a bit.

Getting back to the topic of sex: you have to purge yourself from former sexual relationships. Sex is so much more than what we've been told and taught. Sex education only focuses on the physical aspect of mating. But it leaves us woefully lacking in understanding the spiritual and emotional ramifications of sex.

God didn't design the human body or spirit for multiple sexual encounters. But in our rebellious state as rebellious children we've abused our bodies with multiple sexual partners, which has a negative residual effect on our minds, hearts, bodies and spirits.

Then we cry out to God in our misery when our lives fall apart: particularly our relationships. God instituted marriage for a reason. But when we violate God's principles of sex by having relations with anyone or lust draws us to, we will reap disaster in our lives because of it.

God wants us to be whole and healthy. After all: He's our designer and knows how we function best. We need to break those former physical ties from our past in order to be free from the resulting soul ties.

If you find yourself fantasizing about having sex with an ex, you need to recover the parts of your fragmented soul left behind with the person(s) you were once with. Especially if you find yourself thinking about an ex while conjugating with your current spouse. And you need to do so ASAP.

The problem is that you cannot do this on your own. There's no self-healing you can do to recover your soul. Bits of pieces of your soul will remain with those others; and you'll suffer from soul-fragmentation because of it. Soul healing is only something that God can perform. Because it'll take a creative miracle to get the missing pieces of your soul back again. Therefore you need to know the concrete steps to take in order to be totally and completely free.

God will free you and restore what is missing. But it won't necessarily happen with one simple prayer or the way you think it will.

There are many articles online that deal with this topic: but 99.9% of them I've read are very misleading. Instead of setting you free and making you whole, they'll only lead to further frustration and more bondage. Because they're missing vitally important components to restoration.

**And it's way too much info to share in articles like this one. Which is why I completed an ebook that you can download and start reading right away. This ebook is titled DIVA GODDESS QUEEN: Breaking the power of soul ties, lust and sexual demons and it'll help you to recover from past relationships so you can be totally present in every way for the one you are with.

Even if you're not with someone right now, you still need to be free and made whole again. And this is something this ebook will help you accomplish - male or female. May you take the first step towards wholeness and completion by clicking on the link below and downloading this fantastic ebook. God bless.

Amos Moses #fundie disqus.com

you can put powdered sugar on a turd .... i does not then become a jelly donut ..... you defend DEPRAVITY ....... you are for abortion so you really do not care for children ..... so therefore you defend what pedophiles do ...... and the people using homosexual topics to make cartoons for children about sexual DEPRAVITY of HOMOMIRAGE ..... IS PEDOPHILIA ......

AND YOU DEFEND IT ..... BY DEFAULT .... YOU DEFEND PEDOPHILES AND WHAT THEY DO ..... you are not a real man ...... you are a homosexualist .... one who supports depravity ......... is that bigoted .... then .... COUNT ME IN ........

KABOOM THE MOONS #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

WE ARE BEING FARMED IN THE MOON LIKE PLANTS! WE ARE NOT REALLY HERE! GET THE MEMO!

From the movie the island 2005.

-Ladies and gentlemen,
welcome to
the next generation of science,
the agnate.
An organic frame engineered
directly into adulthood
to match the client's age.
You're looking at stage one
This way, sir.
In its development.
Within 12 months
it will be harvest-ready,
...
all our agnates are maintained
in a persistent vegetative state.
...
Two of our products have escaped.
Impressive,
considering they're vegetative.(HAHAHA ON THE MONEY AGAIN WHY HADES/SATAN/LUNAR BOSS BRAGS NO ONE CAN ESCAPE HIM!)
Well, after several years
of trial and error,
we discovered that
without consciousness,
without human experience,
emotion, without life,
the organs failed.
(IN SHORT FOR OUR HIGHER SELF TO SUCCESSFULLY GROW ENOUGH FOR SLAUGHTER AND CONSUMPTION IN THE MOON HE MUST EXPERIENCE HUMAN LIFE!!!)

DO YOU GET THE BIG PICTURE NOW GUYS?
I CANT HELP BUT ADMIRE HOW I FINALLY PUT TOGETHER ALL THE BITS AND PIECES THAT ARE SCRAMBLED LIKE THE DRAGON BALLS THROUGHOUT COUNTLESS MOVIES, CARTOONS, RELIGIONS, MYTHS ETC ETC.
HOLY MOLY MAN HOLY MOLY!!!

HOLY MOLY AGAIN MAN THAT'S WHY DREAM AND LIFE FEEL THE SAME TO OUR HIGHER REAL SELF. IT'S BECAUSE BOTH ARE DREAM TO HIM! THAT'S WHY HE/WE CANT TELL THE DIFFERENCE!

AND I USED TO THINK MY SENSES BETRAY ME AND LIE TO ME WHEN I SLEEP AND DREAM. THEY WERE TELLING ME THE TRUTH THE WHOLE TIME!

WE'RE NOT HERE WE'RE IN THE MOON GROWING LIKE A PLANT!

HOLY MOLY THE ALIENS MOVIES(AND HALO GAMES) CAME TO MIND WHERE HUMANS WERE BEING IMMERSED AND TRAPPED IN ALIEN GOO LIKE PLANTS WHERE LIKE IN THE MOVIE THE ISLAND THEY WERE BEING USED TO GROW FROM SOMEONE ELSE'S BABY(ALIENS) TO FOOD AND ORGANS FOR THE ALIENS(REPTILIAN LUNAR SCUM!)

Boaxy #fundie en.wikipedia.org

I know it sucks, but that is just how wikipedia generally is. The whole point of an encyclopedia is to be politically correct and label and get as much information on every person, place, thing or ideas possible. There aren't that many predominately black shows, so it's nice to categorize them, so putting a category of "African-American" shows, in the Cosby show article makes sense. There aren't that many LGBT related anime stories that deal with transgender issues or lesbian and homosexual romance like Sailor Moon does.

So it's nice to honor that and show that Sailor Moon does fall under that circumstance. Yeah I see what you mean, I would love for people to just be people, and tv shows to just be tv shows, being that the anime community for the most part is in a bubble of sorts and uses anime to escape themselves from politically correct socialism, which is why anime is as obscure as it is. But anime like any type of culture, still falls under the sense of reality structure and if a show has lgbt characters and storylines, those categories should be added.

Anti Zionist League #conspiracy #racist #homophobia #transphobia #kinkshaming antizionistleague.com

Sexual Bolshevism is the politicization of sexual depraved acts and behaviours that are collectively described as mental disorders under the term paraphilias. Coined in Germany by Ludwig Hoppe, a Lutheran pastor from Berlin who in 1921 authored Sexual Bolshevism and Defense Against Same.Broadly it encapsulates Jewish Marxist persons and groups that continually seek acceptance of sexual depravity and lobby for changes to the legal and medical status of perverted sexual interests and practices. This is the origin of ‘sex education’ delivered to children in the classroom proving that it is a deliberate policy to undermine Europe.

(video titled “Truth Video: Jews Created The Porn Industry)

Jim #sexist blog.jim.com

The basics of Reaction need to be stated, and they need to be stated in a way that excludes our enemies, because we are seeing a whole lot of people saying “Hail fellow reactionary”, who are clearly hostile to us, and not hostile the media/academic/judicial elite that we seek to overthrow, blaming various groups that tend to be allied or sympathetic to reaction for the problems caused by our holier than thou elite, urging reactionaries that the real enemy is group X, where X is anyone who is plausibly an ally or likely to become one.

So, starting with the concepts most likely to offend: The reactionary red pill on women. Which are also concepts that have practical application even while our enemies rule. Next articles in the Reaction 101 series will be more directly political and have less individual application in daily life.

Emancipation was a bad idea. Feral women behave badly and are psychologically disturbed. They need to be redeemed by becoming the property of some man. Women are psychologically maladapted to independence and equality

In any marriage or long term relationship, the woman will endlessly launch physical, emotional, and legal power struggles against her husband or boyfriend, shit tests, which power struggles she wants to lose.

If she wins, she will break up, looking for someone who can conquer her. You just have to win. If the only way to win without going to jail is to send her away, send her away and go dark. But she would rather you beat her. You have to wear the pants. This is the PUA analysis of negs and shit tests, applied to long term relationships.

Women are maladapted to equality. That women find male apes sexually attractive and men do not find female apes sexually attractive indicates that among those humans that whites and east asians are descended from, females have not been allowed to make sexual choices since the days we looked rather like apes. Since female sexual choice is quite common, we should conclude that groups that allowed women sexual choice failed to reproduce or suffered dysgenesis, and perished.

In order to reproduce, and particularly in order to reproduce the white and east Asian ancestral environment, in a cold climate with severe winters that require food and shelter over winter, husbands and wives need cooperate/cooperate equilibrium, and if you have free women, you get defect/defect equilibrium. To impose cooperate/cooperate requires external coercion, in particular that women have to be stuck with the first guy that they have sex with, and are not permitted to be permanently on the prowl to trade up throughout their fertile years.

When allowed to be permanently on the prowl, they tend to practice serial monogamy until around thirty or so when their eggs start running out.

All businesses with women in power are destroyed, unless they are the beneficiaries of some state favor that artificially keeps them in business. Female executives are only useful if under the authority of a sexy alpha male, otherwise they turn on the shareholders, the employees, and the customers, perceiving them as betas.

Subjective personal observation: All sexual harassment complaints result from horny women shit testing terrified men, and then getting frustrated because the terrified men fail their shit tests. This personal observation is statistically confirmed by the fact that a far larger proportion of women complain about sexual harassment in workplaces where the women substantially outnumber the men. There has never been one complaint of sexual harassment against me, and if sexual harassment complaints resulted from social justice warriors tell us constitutes sexual harassment, there would have been a pile of them.

Subjective personal observation: All rape complaints are false and all rape convictions are false, not because real rapes do not happen, but because women do not really mind real rapes and fail to complain. This personal observation is confirmed by the University of Virginia complaints process: The university of Virginia dealt with a big pile of rape and sex complaints, and dismissed every single one without disciplinary action. So Rolling Stone investigated them looking for poster girls and trouble, came up empty.

Men and women very much want to form families and want those families to last into their old age. My wife was eighteen in my eyes all her years, except near to the very end, and even though I sometimes have some pleasant youthful female companionship, I still sometimes find myself shaking and weeping when I remember my wife.

If you look at any successful family, no one is equal. Dad is in charge, mum picks up the socks. In principle, it is possible to form families in a society where men and women are equal, by freely contracting out of equality, but in practice, it is hard, and I see how hard it is for my sons. We have prisoners dilemma with few iterations, so the natural equilibrium between men and women is defect/defect. To prevent defect/defect, to ensure cooperate/cooperate, requires heavy handed coercive intervention by state, family, and society, and this heavy handed coercion necessarily bears far more heavily on women than on men. If you want a society where men and women know sexual love, or if you want a society which has above replacement total fertility rate, women just cannot be allowed to follow their pussies. And this requires a lot of supervision and coercion, primarily keeping women under control, rather than keeping men under control. For most women this requires that they be subject to the potential threat of physical discipline by the men in their lives. For a great many women, this requires that they be subject to the actuality of physical discipline by the men in their lives. So women should never have been emancipated, and some “violence against women” is legitimate, proper, and proportionate. Women, like children and dogs, need discipline and supervision and are never happy if they do not get them. A spoiled child, or a spoiled woman, or a spoiled dog, is never happy. The dog and the woman bark all the time.

Further, sexual impulses set in in girls at a disturbingly early age, usually well before puberty thought there is a great deal of variance, while male sexual impulses set in at puberty, as reliable as clockwork.

Ever greater vigilance against pedophiles” is like telling a chicken farmer he should not fence or cage his chickens, but instead should make the world safe for his chickens to wander wherever they please. When nine year old girls go to an Ariana Grande concert without being accompanied and supervised by male kin, they are going there to get nailed. Restraints on female sexuality have to restrain females, have to be oppressive to women, because being oppressive to men is not likely to work, and is conspicuously and spectacularly failing to work.

The family law of the Old Testament got it right, and modernity is surrealistically deluded, and flat in my face insane. I see in front of my nose stuff that no one else sees, so either I am insane or the world is, and the statistics are strangely consistent with me being sane, and difficult to reconcile with the world being sane. If you are using words for human things and human conduct that the people of the Old Testament had no words for, chances are you are using words for things that have no real existence, anticoncepts, words that are lies, that you are speaking madness and delusion.

The family law and family institutions dictated in Deuteronomy and depicted in the Book of Proverbs lasted for thousands of years. Our current social order is extremely recent. Within living memory, within my memory, it has changed radically in ways that are horrifying, tragic, and terrifying, and everyone is acting like this is normal and nothing is wrong.

Modernity is for me like one of those horror movies where one character sees monsters and another character does not, and you wonder if the monsters are real or just delusion, until you see someone get eaten by a monster. And I see people getting eaten by monsters, in the sense of transparently false rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, sexual harassment et cetera charges, and I also see people who tell me men have nothing to fear, because women never lie, while women have much to fear because they so very very much dislike rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, and sexual harassment. But I also see these men acting terrified, while I am bolder than any of those men who supposedly believe that men have nothing to fear. In part of their minds they must see what I see, because I see their fear, and in part of their minds, the part that speaks and constructs a narrative, they do not see what I see, even though it is right in front of them.

Women get angry because they do not get the supervision, command, and guidance that they crave. Sometimes this anger turns inward, as with cutting and other self destructive acts, and sometimes it turns outward. She feels really badly treated, because she has in fact been really badly treated, but because the real causes of her discontent are unthinkable, she concludes she has been sexually harassed or sexually assaulted, when in fact her mistreatment was lack of sexual assault, lack of a strong hand to discipline her.

Brian Tomasik #fundie reducing-suffering.org

The difference between non-player characters (NPCs)in video games and animals in real life is a matter of degree rather than kind. NPCs and animals are both fundamentally agents that emerge from a complicated collection of simple physical operations, and the main distinction between NPCs and animals is one of cognitive and affective complexity. Thus, if we care a lot about animals, we may care a tiny bit about game NPCs, at least the more elaborate versions. I think even present-day NPCs collectively have some ethical significance, though they don't rank near the top of ethical issues in our current world. However, as the sophistication and number of NPCs grow, our ethical obligations toward video-game characters may become an urgent moral topic.

...

If video games can be seen as "real" in a similar way as our own world, what distinguishes video-game characters from real people and animals? I think it comes down to differences in complexity, especially with regard to specific algorithms that we associate with "sentience." As I've argued elsewhere, sentience is not a binary property but can be seen with varying degrees of clarity in a variety of systems. We can interpret video-game characters as having the barest rudiments of consciousness, such as when they reflect on their own state variables ("self-awareness"), report on state variables to make decisions in other parts of their program ("information broadcasting"), and select among possible actions to best achieve a goal ("imagination, planning, and decision making"). Granted, these procedures are vastly simpler than what happens in animals, but a faint outline is there. If human sentience is a boulder, present-day video-game characters might be a grain of sand.

Digital agents using biologically plausible cognitive algorithms seem most likely to warrant ethical consideration. This is especially true if they use reinforcement learning, have a way of representing positive and negative valence for different experiences, and broadcast this information in a manner that unifies different parts of their brains into a conscious collective. Yet, I find it plausible that other attributes of an organism matter at least a little bit as well, such as engaging in apparently goal-directed behavior, having a metric for "betterness vs. worseness" of its condition, and executing complex operations in response to environmental situations. Many NPCs in video games have some of these attributes, at least to a vanishing degree, even if most (thankfully) don't yet have frameworks for reinforcement learning or sophisticated emotion.

...

Especially in RPGs, some NPCs have explicit representations of their "welfare level" in the form of hit points (HP), and the NPCs implement at least crude rule-based actions aiming to preserve their HP. In some turn-based RPGs like Super Mario RPG or Pokémon, an NPC may even choose an action whose sole purpose is to bolster its defenses against damage in subsequent rounds of the battle. The extent of damage may affect action selection. For example, in Revenge of the Titans (source code), drones select a building to target based on a rating formula that incorporates HP damage:

rating = cost * (damage / newTarget.getMaxHitPoints()) * factor * distanceModifier;

Even NPCs without explicit HP levels have an implicit degree of welfare, such as a binary flag for whether they've been killed. NPCs that require multiple strikes to be slain -- for instance, a boss who needs to be struck with a sword three times to die -- carry HP state information not exposed to the user. They also display scripted aversive reactions in response to damage.

And maybe representations of valuation could be seen more abstractly than in an explicit number like HP. In animal brains, values seem to be encoded by firing patterns of output nodes of certain neural networks. Why couldn't we also say that the patterns of state variables in an NPC encode its valuation? Animal stimulus valuation exists because of the flow-on effects that such valuation operations have on other parts of the brain. So why not regard variables or algorithms that trigger flow-on effects in NPCs as being a kind of at least implicit valuation?

Abdur Raheem #fundie ummah.com


Just to note, I'm not judging anyone by making this post or trying to act overly religious. Applies to me as well. This is reminder like every other one that I felt required a whole post on it's own due to the prevalence of it. If you are a person who involves themselves in any of these forms of entertainment, please don't be rude about what I have to say.


A large portion of Muslims today still engage in entertaining themselves with haram entertainment and I wanted to have a look at each form explaining why we should stay away from it.

1) Movies

Probably the most viewed form of entertainment out of all them. The whole purpose of movies is to make you forget about your life and just enjoy fiction for a while. The problem here is that people start to lose focus of why they are here by involving themselves with movies to much. We are here to win our Akhira and enjoy as much as possible there. If we spend most of time wasting it on fantasies which are pointless and just pass time, then we will regret it heavily later when we see how much lower our rank in Jannah is by losing out on all those good deeds we could have done.

It is the nature of entertainment media to choose attractive men and women, which immediately negates the modesty required of a Muslim. We should always be lowering our gazes whenever we see someone of great attractiveness since they could induce evil thoughts. It would be pointless to spend half the movie lowering the gaze every now and then.

Then there's obviously the filthy behavior that is being displayed in the movies. Free mixing and zina and partying and zina and foul language and zina and free mixing and all the filthy things you can think of. Young people will start to feel like they are missing out on all the fun of interacting with the opposite gender by watching these movies thinking "What's the worst that could happen?"

Animated movies and "movies for kids" are something terrible as well. Don't be fooled by the "child friendly" approach they try to show you. Small little drops of fitna are poured here and there all over the movie. Let's take "Frozen" for example. A kids movie which grossed over a billion dollars which released last year. Story about a girl who was going to get married to a guy. Has family issues with psycho sister. Guy was evil. Goes for another guy. Happy ending. Seems pretty nice. But it's not.
Subliminally in the story, while this girl was going to marry one man, she travels alone with another man for the sister issues part of the movie, and starts to fall in love with him. But oh dear, they can't be together since she's supposed to marry another man, so obviously the script decides to make him evil, giving her the green light to jump on to the other guy. And the audience is supposed to think this whole thing was ok.

This sort of freemixing showcased in movies shows exactly why we shouldn't be watching them. This was a kids movie that too. Had it been an 18+ movie or real life, we know what major sin they most likely would have done while they were simply travelling together. Then another kids movie made a character homosexual for no reason. Kids growing up to that will think "Gay people are funny and nice ".

2) TV shows

Majority of the reasons have already been stated but TV shows have their own special problem.

More length = More time wasted over years and years.

Then there's the fact that the most popular shows like How I met your mother and FRIENDS revolve around friends committing zina without anything that moves that gives consent all in the name of "Searching for true love". Yes, you want to know you love someone, so you go around committing zina. What's worse is that in their freemixing between themselves as friends, these characters fall in love with each other and commit zina.

And then shows like Game of Thrones showcasing more nudity that the adult industry would be proud of with a side serving of sexual perversions like incest, orgies and other sick things.

Breaking bad? Adulterous wife.

The Walking dead? Adulterous wife.

House of Cards? Adulterous everything.

Entourage? Let's not even talk about it.

And the list goes on and on when it comes to filthy things being displayed on these shows.

It's as if they make the script saying "Hey Louie! This not enough zina in this season. Make this woman an adulteress. We need dem ratings!!" "Sure thing, Franky!"

3) Music

I don't understand why women themselves support the music industry when so many songs and music videos treat women like objects. Last year there was a music video which had completely naked women with fully suited men. In an interview, the woman said that "sometimes a girl just needs to have a little fun with her body". And later that year, Lady Gaga decided to perform a song completely naked. And all sorts of indecent things happen when music is involved. Look at bars and clubs, a place where music is played when men and women just rub themselves against each other which they couldn't do without music ("Bikini is ok on the beach but not in buildings" effect) they have a one night stand and never meet again. This goes completely against the dignity of a human being.

Furthermore, music plays in our head throughout the day if we listen to it. We lose concentration now and then because a song was playing in our head. This could happen when we are in Salah and ruin our kushoo.

Then there's the fact that people lose their minds over the artists. One Direction, Bieber and the rest. Causing people to lose their mind and act so irrationally. Willing to cut themselves for their sake. The worst part being that these celebrities don't even care about them back.

Then there's the fact that majority of songs encourage zina and acts that lead to it. And then there's the fact that so many filthy words are included in these songs.

4) Video Games

While this one hurts the most for me to say, Video games are probably the worst out of all these things. Rasulullah mentioned that people who make images are amongst the worst creations of Allah . Would you pay money for a person who murders? For a rapist? For a thief? Paying money for video games is support for the haram that these people are doing.

Furthermore, video games contains all the problems of all other forms of entertainment.

Music, violence, nudity, foul language, excessive time waste, forgetting Dunya and everything else.

Studies have also shown that playing video games can increase agitation in people. It also makes people more lazy, wanting to sit in one place for hours just watching a screen. Getting annoyed when they are called away for something else.


What many of us don't know is that these things can directly change our imaan. Everything we expose ourselves to can influence we act and think. But we refuse to believe that simply because it is entertainment. Think of all the bad thoughts and ideas that have been put in our minds because of exposing ourselves to these things. It could have been one TV show episode that brought us this much closer to the idea of being ok with zina. The most dangerous thought you can have is "It's not going to happen to me. I can control myself"

We should all keep in mind that whatever we give up for Allah He will give you something better. We could be throwing away so much happiness which lasts forever for extremely temporary happiness. Think about it....aren't we all still going to be sad and depressed about some problem or another even after watching movies, tv shows, listening to music and playing games? Then what was the point of them besides wasting time? In the long run we just lose time and money. Most importantly we lose the immense rewards that we can get for leaving these acts which we will ALWAYS be happy about.

we should try our best to leave these acts for the happiness of Allah and become the best Muslims we can possibly be

rodneyweg #fundie ministeringdeliverance.com


I think we ought to look at the Word. Job's Leviathan is clearly a dragon. Revelation 12: 9 speaks of the Devil and Satan as that old serpent, the great dragon. Revelation 20: 2 repeats the dragon for Satan and the devil.

I respect the opinions that I've read. It seems, however, as though demons like to claim to be Leviathan, but this is their boss' title.

A dragon is either an animal in the spirit world or what serpents looked like before they were cursed. Serpents now travel on their bellies since they were cursed by God in Geneses.

eric_otness #fundie gamefaqs.com

Dont these SJW know that normalizing pedophilia is whats next on the agenda? You might wanna go check Vox, CNN, and Huffington Post. How else are they going to learn to live with the muslims in Europe?

Anyway Marie could pass for under 18, its why everyone likes her, its why she is on the cover of the game, its why she was voted number 1. Why dont you go buy your worthless asses some plane tickets to the UK and protest in Rotherham if you give such a f*** about children and stop crying about a video game produced by the cleanest society on earth when you all live among the most vile.

I'm not sure I'd call Japan the cleanest society, especially when, in the case of the Pokémon Anime, they did definitely depict the female characters as sex objects even when they were canonically 10 years old, and besides which, Japan is actually one of the biggest distributers of child porn: http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheistic_Japan_and_child_pornography

However, you are right about one thing: legalizing child porn is next on the SJW's radar whether they know it or not

True pedophiles would, you know, be attracted to people who were literally underage, like, I don't know, those people who actually hit it on with May or Dawn or Serena from Pokémon (who are quite explicitly 10 years old). In fact, Masamitsu Hidaka would qualify as a pedophile since his interview made it VERY clear that he views the girls in Pokémon, all of whom are 10 or younger, as just being sexualized meat for the audience, and with May and Serena, it's extremely obvious due to their having massive breasts.

'all keep waving around MR's manufactured age as if that's proof of non-pedophilia. When at best, it's proof of law-abiding pedophilia.

You're attracted to a character who:
- Looks like a child
- Dresses like a child
- Sounds like a child
- Speaks like a child
- Acts like a child
Etc. The overwhelming number of people meeting these characteristics are children. In fact, these characteristics are what separate children from adults. You're attracted to the things that make children "children." That makes you a pedophile.


*However*, you slam on the brakes if the potential object of your attraction is under age. 14-year-old looking and acting like MR: No go. Exact same person with an earlier birthday: Full steam ahead. That proves you understand and respect the law. Which is really all we can ask of people.

My primary concern is if they are literally children, ie, even their age is indeed 10. I would consider those who hit it off to May, Dawn, Iris, Serena, heck, even Misty from the Pokémon Anime when they are explicitly 10 years old to be pedophiles, NOT those who crush on Marie Rose, who at least is 18 years of age.

At most, Marie Rose would qualify as a manchild, which still doesn't make those who crush on her pedophiles. It's like saying girls who crush on, say, Kefka Palazzo must automatically be pedophiles just because he acts like a child and speaks like a child (literally in this case, since in the Japanese version, he uses the pronoun "boku-chin" which is generally appropriate only for very young children). And bear in mind, Kefka's in his thirties, and it's extremely obvious in Dissidia Final Fantasy that he isn't even close to a child anyway (though since he is somewhat diminutive in Final Fantasy VI, he could look like a child in the latter game).

One Million Moms #homophobia friendlyatheist.patheos.com

The evangelical Christian hate group One Million Moms (Twitter count: 4,758) can’t believe that Disney just introduced its first LGBTQ character. They’re referring to the character Officer Specter, voiced by Lena Waithe, who is open about having a same-sex partner in the upcoming movie Onward.

The Moms can’t handle the existence of an openly gay character, because they see it as homosexual indoctrination. Which makes about as much sense as kids saying they want to become cyclops themselves because the same character has only one eye.


There have been numerous attempts by Disney to indoctrinate children with the LGBTQ agenda discretely [sic] and now more overtly…

Disney has decided to be politically correct instead of providing family friendly programming. Disney should stick to entertaining, not pushing an agenda.

Please share this with your friends and family to make sure they are aware of the gay character in Onward and not blindsided by it. As moms, we all want to know when Disney is attempting to desensitize our children by normalizing the LGBTQ lifestyle.

It’s not clear what isn’t family friendly about the mere mention of a same-sex partner. Closing your eyes and covering your ears and pretending gay people don’t exist won’t make them go away.

Like it or not, children are going to have classmates with same-sex parents, or classmates who aren’t cisgender or straight. Representation of them on-screen acknowledges their existence. No one is forcing an orientation on viewers, just as the movie isn’t demanding that everyone accept those characters’ partners.

It’s telling that these Moms get overly outraged whenever gay characters appear in children’s programming considering they haven’t put out any press releases condemning the Trump administration’s separation of children from their parents. They don’t care about actual problems. Just ones they’ve created for themselves because they’re supposedly guided by their faith.

Mark Figley: Sexualization of American culture - The Lima News #conspiracy #homophobia limaohio.com

Despite the American Left’s endless obsession with removing Donald Trump from office, one of its greatest on-going desires is to intensify the sexualization of American culture. This effort continues today through a variety of means and shows no signs of ceasing any time soon. The examples are replete.

PBS has long promoted a far left agenda. Take “Arthur,” the longest-running cartoon series on television for 22 seasons. The May 13, 2019, season premiere episode, “Mr. Ratburn and the Special Someone,” showed aardvark Arthur’s third-grade teacher Mr. Ratburn marrying another man. After Arthur and his friends discover that their teacher is getting married, they assume he is marrying a female rat named Patty. They ultimately learn that Patty is his sister and his actual partner is named Patrick.

The show which is primarily aimed at children ages 4-8, regularly explores many challenging themes. Yet although the cartoon children take the news in motion, most real life pre-school children are naturally shocked and confused. This is increasingly par for the course, as PBS has sought to sexualize kids on everything from “Sesame Street” to the Muppets; compliments of U.S. taxpaying parents who never signed up to see marriage re-defined for their own children.

Then, there’s the case of the California Board of Education, which also in May of 2019, implemented Health Education Framework curriculum in its public schools, requiring K-12 students to actually question their parents on topics of sex. Known as the California Healthy Youth Act, the concept was created by the California legislature in 2016 to educate students in the fight against HIV and sexually transmitted diseases; developing “healthy attitudes” towards sexual orientation, gender and relationships; and to “promote understanding of sexuality as a normal part of human development.”

And though parents may exclude their children from sex education, they are prohibited from opting them out of discussions pertaining to gender, gender identity, gender expression or sexual orientation. California law also prohibits abstinence-only education or any discussion of religion. Beginning in seventh grade, students are then required to be educated on “all FDA-approved methods preventing pregnancy and HIV/STD transmission.” Many parents have been outraged with schools using curriculum containing explicit photos and drawings of sexual activity, while a video surfaced depicting an ACLU attorney instructing teachers how to assist students obtain abortions without parental knowledge or consent.

Northern Virginia schools are also sexualizing students; with groups of high schoolers openly holding hands and acting like common couples in the halls. Other students actually view themselves as animals or “furries.” While such behavior once qualified as seriously problematic, it is now celebrated by educators and even the American Psychological Association. Any natural reactions of alarm are classified as hateful.

Lastly, LGBTQ organizations continue to systematically change societal norms; drastically impacting children’s innocence. Transgender athletes compete against females; unfairly denying them the ability to win. Biological boys and girls use each others’ bathrooms and locker rooms. Some states now allow parents to choose gender “X” for their newborns. In Vermont, the government proposes that taxpayers cover up to 16 different transgender sex reassignment surgeries for minors; even if parents deny consent. Mental health treatment to deal with such issues is increasingly prohibited. Meanwhile, libraries sponsor Drag Queen Story Time with cross-dressers reading stories to preschool children on gender transitioning and sexual orientation.

The Left used to hide such blatant intent to radically re-organize society. Now, with each passing day, they defy people to stop their never-ending mission to indoctrinate America’s children. The Judeo-Christian values that once defined our norms continue to be eliminated, while parents are either unaware of what is truly going on in the classroom or told to butt out if they disagree. Resistance often seems futile.

One thing is certain. LGBTQ activists don’t seek to simply live on a level plain with the rest of society. Their ultimate goal is part of an overall plan espoused by many on the Left. As Michelle Obama once aptly explained, “We’re going to have to change our traditions, our history; we’re going to have to move into a different place as a nation.”

And so it goes. Indoctrination has replaced education in not just California, but in states far and wide. The daunting task of protecting America’s children is long overdue; although it can be achieved if parents join together in common purpose. This includes closely policing what their children watch and turning away from the destructive agenda of public schools by investigating private and home schooling options. The future prospects for the success of our kids in an increasingly chaotic world depend on it.

Mark Figley is a political activist and guest columnist from Elida. His column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the The Lima News editorial board or AIM Media, owner of The Lima News. Reach him a figley@wcoil.com.

Heru Sankofa #homophobia #conspiracy #wingnut conflictingviews.wordpress.com

But naw, this shit was triggered because I used the word “faggot”. That’s fine. Get mad! I’m letting you know right there that I don’t want you creeping that bullshit into Sonic. You already have Last of Us, Battlefield (the same franchise that diminished the Harlem Hellfighters, btw), you even got Trini from Power Rangers for fuck’s sake, and all the best options in Mass Effect. You even bullied Nintendo into giving you a gay option in Tomodachi Life. You made Ice Man gay. You have Wiccan and Hulkling, and Batwoman. You have plenty of newer franchises coming out with gay shit in it. You…. do not…. ever…. need to go… to an older franchise… and transform the main character… into… a….. FAGGOT! There is no good reason for it. None whatsoever. And if we’re being honest, that would go against creator intent anyway. Sonic was intended to have a hetero love interest before the first game came into existence. Everyone knows about Madonna’s ass. There was intent to create another one, Tiara Boobowski, since Sally could barely squeeze in a game appearance. But everyone was on the same page. Sonic is fucking STRAIGHT! “Oh but he’s never had an active romance within the games“, nevermind 06 which shipped the hell out of Sonic and Elise. The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. What, you gonna say Shadow’s gay too? His creator ships him and Maria (which in itself is fucking creepy, but eh).

Lets just stop the dance for a minute. Gay people saw the success of the Sonic movie, and now they want to use the newfound relevance of Sonic as a springboard to push homosexuality onto CHILDREN. Strictly about increasing their dating pool for the future. That’s it. I’ve said it before, they are opportunistic jackasses who see everything in the world as a tool to push their own agenda. Sonic as a franchise has been deranged enough as it is, it does NOT need this bullshit. Every time you get a gay ANYTHING, it’s celebrated like the second coming. Trini from the Power Rangers movie was a SHIT character, but the mere implication of her having a habit of doing the scissor dance was enough to get praised in articles online. Tangle and Whisper are unappealing characters outside of their sexuality, and people were on a tear about Tangle wanting to fuck Blaze for a hot minute. This has nothing to do with the quality of these characters, and everything to do with this push. Everyone says the same thing in regards to gays. “It’s fine so long as you keep it away from me“. Gay people DON’T honor that at all. They (or their media supporters) have this obsessive need to inject their lifestyle into everything that has a pulse, electronic or otherwise. And I’m sick of it. If you actually enjoyed the series, you would not push for a change in it. You only do that if you see a PROBLEM! Sonic being straight is not a problem! Unless the image of straight people is problematic for you. Then who’s really insecure?

And…. where the hell did we get this idea that being open to the idea of Sonic being gay is “manly“? What the fuck? Like… the “GAY COMMUNITY” can dictate masculinity or some shit. Maybe that phrase has some meaning to it. “Those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach“.

Nontrollingaccount, Godoftruelove, and HPFNU_redcurve #sexist reddit.com

(nontrollingaccount): I hate being attracted to attractive women, it's a massive pain in the heart and penis. I would pay top dollar to turn off sexuality to the point that when I see a hot/sexy/attractive woman, it would be no different than looking at a twig or a tire on the side of a highway.
If there is a safe city with way more unattractive and ugly people, I'd move there in a heartbeat.

Can't even pursue higher education or even go to stores without seeing attractive women in yoga pants/tight jeans. For the time being, trying not to look is the only option which fails in times when I least expect to see a hot woman. I went to Target to buy a bed set and a coffee maker, and I usually go an hour before they close to avoid lines, shoppers, and hot women, and there were hot women there anyway, black, white, arab, latina shopping for their tall husbands/partners.

(Godoftruelove): It's possible, but at least from what I know, you would have had to had not seen porn since puberty hit. I was lucky that I avoided porn for various reasons, mostly love, and I developed without it.
Most guys, look at porn as soon as puberty strikes, and it hyper-inflates their attraction to women, thus you feel attraction to women you don't want to, pre-porn, guys could be with a hot woman and NOT fall in love with her at sight, or even feel anything like guys do now.

Whoever introduced porn brainwashed and cucked society and men. Thus the root of the suffering is this. If you started off with a porn free beggining, girls wouldn't be able to torture you like they do now.
It might just be that I'm demi-sexual, but the correlation with my porn-free/fap-free development, and my now ability to not be attracted to beautiful women, despite still having the occasional need/urge to see boobs/be snuggled every now and then is still present, but never directed at any women(a condition I need to meet in order to enjoy any sort of sexual activity is that I must love the girl, and impossible thing to do now since I expect the same level of love from the girl, and I was fully aware since even back then of a lot of girls only seeking pleasure solely, and not true love.)

(HPFNU_redcurve): Chemical castration. I think lots of Incels should look into it- it might be the only way. If you can't solve a problem, kill it!
It won't help with wanting love though, it'll only turn you asexual. The job's half-done, now all we need to figure out is how to become aromantic and we're in the clear.

darkbulb121 #conspiracy #quack #wingnut deviantart.com

This is not going to be quick.

" - If COVID-19 isn't dangerous, then why are there SO MANY people dying from it in coutnries such as the USA and Italy? "

More than that die every year from influenza. Your being lied to. The numbers are estimated to be a minimum of 25% INFLATED BASED ON EXPOSED OVER REPORTING, FALSE REPORTING AND COMORBIDITY REPORTS. They bring a guy in, What happened? He was attacked by a tiger. Test him for Covid. Yep, cause of death, "Covid 19", check. That alone should be enough for you but no you've been hooked up to the propaganda teat too long. Another example, my kid works at a UPS hub, shit from all over the planet. People there got sick, just like last year. People pushed through the sickness with antihistamines, just like last year. None of them died on a ventilator in a hospital, they still work there... just like last year.

" Social distancing, as well as good hygeine and stopping people from touching absolutely everything, "

You are an idiot... there's no nice way to put this. Social Distancing is complete bullshit. People in Walmart, customer & employee touch EVERYTHING. A virus does not come on a fucking 6' leash. Everything I postulate is self evident. A person only has to rationalize. WE ARE COVERED WITH MICROORGANISMS. This is normal and healthy.

This next part is just sad and sick. You actually think like this. " we have been allowed to go outside the house, do exercise (even if it's just in the backyard) ..."

ALLOWED??? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME??? No one "allows" me to do anything. It's my natural born right to keep right on going anywhere I went yesterday. That you would even tolerate someone telling you what you're "allowed" to do in that respect is again, sad & sick.

" rather, you are protecting others when you stop your COVID breath from going onto others " Surgical masks, bandanas, folded paper towels filter nothing. No Seal = No Filter should be obvious to you. Yet instead you behave as you feel, not as you know logic dictates. Someone "in authority" tells you to do it & so you do obediently even when you know a virus can pass through and around the material. Even you know that it filters nothing you'll continue to behave as you've been "made to feel safe" by a lying talking head on "TV" and a useless token face diaper.

America was founded on DISobedience, (not on "slavery" as our leftist rewritten history books now teach). That's the reason we still have what little freedoms we have here today. Not enough of us are foolish enough yet to let them disarm us. When's the last time you broke down your AR much less did a little training? Over here we build our own firearms LEGALLY. Now THAT'S freedom. It's also a good insulator against the corrupt and overpowered government we face in all countries today.

You're bragging about "obedience" of all things, qualifying it by pointing out what you're "allowed" to do and thinking of it as some token reward you earned. "OBEYED their governments and are and are being rewarded with their COVID-19 restrictions being taken down". Spoken like a true slave. You did what you're trained to do and you got a treat for it so you'll do it again next time your master tells you when & where you can go potty & when & where you can't.

Of course it's a scam. Holy shit they tried to attach every fucking Green New Deal agenda to the C19 false flag. It was practically an identical grocery list. That stunt was more obvious than a kid caught up to his elbow in a cookie jar and chocolate chip smears on his face.

Agendas evidencing the true purpose of C19 include but are not limited to: 5G push, intense ramping up of ever increasing surveillance of the common citizen. That one alone is enough but there's more: "Social distancing" is just testing our obedience and training us to fear contacting each other. It also provides the needed 6' margin between individuals that just happens to be the margin needed to differentiate between us via satellite surveillance. VAXXINES Has on one learned anything from what Bill & Linda, the CDC, the WHO and other vaxx pushing organizations have done to kill and sterilze people in Africa and India? Vaxxines are how you get autoimmune diseases. So what's the solution? More vaxxines that WEAKEN or DAMAGE our immune systems along with major components of our governing hormonal systems such as: pituitary, prostate, thyroid, thymus and many more glands. ID2020 chipping/dyeing/dna altering vaxxines are in no way good things. Do you really like the idea of your whereabouts and activities being constantly monitored? Your exact location known 24/ 7? Those who fall for the transhumanism movement will have their biometrics monitored constantly. The attack on us is as much psychological as it is physical.

Do you like Planned Parenthood? Hope so because that's where the gallons of albumin come from to manufacture those health sabotaging vaxxxines you beg them to control you with. Newsflash: It's not being harvested from the Planned Parenthood Chicken Ranch or the Planned Parenthood Calf Abortion Clinic. We are so far past Christianity's whining chorus of "they're killing babies". Our "dead babies" are PRODUCTS. Yes, Planned Parenthood routinely, daily, fills orders listing things like "complete left leg". Do you have any idea of the dollar amount attached to a pile of harvested dead baby parts? You think those eugenics motherfuckers are just throwing all those valuable parts & fluids in a biohazard dumpster for sterile destruction?

I'm stopping here because that list goes on forever.

" And even when we couldn't do the things we wanted to do normally, we were given alternatives (Houseparty, Zoom, Internet, Online Shopping) to replace what we had taken from us. " again, a slave happy with the garbage master slopped you with. It doesn't even occur to you that none of those things are good for us. Jerking off online does not bring people together. "Gathered apart"??? What sort of drone could find such a ridiculous load of shit suggestion even acceptable? Every option you described is social masturbation, an empty and pathetic pacifier compared to the nutritious titty of real life. The movement to literally repress natural breastfeeding and make mothers and babies dependent on bottle feeding, thus depriving babies of their first NATURAL vaccination, antibodies from mother's milk was put into place decades ago and today we see the effects. Scared sheep with weakened immune systems.

" However, when people disobeyed, such as the United States, the consequences hit them hard. *cough* high death toll *cough* You're just wrong, wrong and stupid. I'm HERE. There's NOTHING GOING ON. It's all overreporting bullshit. My not dead, UPS contaminated kid is evidence. I've been out in this big scary C19 contaminated world the entire time, jogging, doing whatever, going wherever. Not dead yet. I still met weekly with my friends and groups in Dallas. So far I haven't even found a single person sick with C19. No one I know knows anyone with C19. That's 2 tiers deep in people getting into the 100's and no C19. Where's my epidemic? Where's my disease? They promised me pestilence and likely death and I can't even get the snots. Incidentally all my annual sinus infections stopped cold turkey when I started taking care of my health instead of living off depopulation food and box o' wine. The only sickness I've had in years was food poisoning, (bad chicken). No vaxxinations for 2 decades now.

Here's some numbers for you . Less than 1/10,000 die from C19. 9/10 deaths are over age 65. 90% of those infected experience little or no symtoms. You're probably actually scared by that. THAT'S what HERD IMMUNITY IS. America has a few hot spots, everybody did and that's all you're seeing because that's all the Globalist owned media shows you.

Why the hell would I be afraid of something less dangerous than our annual flu.

Another piece of the puzzle. The hydrochloroquine study was sabotaged. It was only given to patients who were already on death's doorstep. They literally gave it only to patients who were on the way out to fuck the study. Why would they keep a tested, proven and effective treatment like hydrochloroquine from us? So we'll line up and let them stick our ass with unsafe, (no double blind study done to evidence vaxxine safety ever), heavy metal contaminated, tracking chip included, vaxxines.

Simply put we find the obvious underlying theme of you post is "OBEY, OBEY, OBEY". If you cannot look at the agendas being pushed down your throat and not recognize the "Create the crisis, provide the solution" dictoral takeover tactics I don't know what to tell you.

So many things I heard about over the years and dismissed, just like I was trained to do, vaxxine dangers, GMOs, fluoride neurotoxin, all I ignored for most of my life. I've learned late that there most certainly is truth to all those issues and many more connected to them. Make no mistake, there is disinfo mingled in, makes effective camouflage for the truth.

In the end a person recognizes all these things I talk about here, not because some talking head told us, not because of any single scrap of so called "evidence" that idiots will endlessly corrupt, twist & misepresent, but because it really is self evident. It's as obvious as the controlled demo of the Twin Towers and Building 7. A building collapse cannot reach terminal velocity. Resistance is present in a collapse and prevents that. There are a million & one pieces of "evidence" like that but because many allowed themselves to be programmed on 911 they still buy the "Aunt Jemima" joke put forth by NIST. You've never even seen an example of the rarest building failure in architectural history and even though you have the sense to know that nothing looks like a controlled demo BUT a controlled demo you're still wired to believe the false flag cover story. These things are self evident. One has only to pay attention.

Yes, the same group of families responsible for 911 designed C19 and a world of other dangerous pathogens, GMOs, dangerous vaxxines, 5G social police system in China being retailored for the United States. We've got rampant adult mental retardation in the US due to fluoride/lead issues PUT INTO in our drinking water. In the US if you're not detoxing you're being mentally retarded. Heavy metal neurotoxins are bad enough for our frontal lobe alone but damage to other organs, renal system, liver, etc. are not to be ignored.

Now that's a big pile of nasty highlights to think about. You have some unpleasant awakening to do. This world is not what they told you it is. What is in the box is not what's on the box. People have been compliant with the dumbing down of our species and many have lost the ability to rationalize for themselves making them dependent on believing what the talking heads tell them. What's in the box they give us is not good for us. This rabbit hole has no bottom.

Sincere good luck. You have a nasty hill to climb. Or you can go right on "obeying" without feeling a hitch. I spent well over a decade "waking". When I actually crossed that line, realization, it was not pleasant but things were finally put into perspective. I've hated being manipulated since I was a kid. I think that's what made me take issue with enough inconsistencies, lies & coverups to start seeing the greater beast. When a person wakes up to their first "deception", their first false flag, that's when we get our first skin of armor against the very real brainwashing that's going on globally. It's not pleasant realizing one has been tinkered with mentally but it's better than not realizing it.

Again, good luck.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesus-is-savior.com

Disney is perhaps the epitome of Illuminati abilities to create images. They have created great images for things Disney. That includes, Walt Disney, Disney movies and Disney’s Amusement parks. The sinister side of them has been carefully hidden. Disney, just as Satan, are deceivers (2nd Corinthians 11:15). They are not what they appear to be. A closer look reveals a very dark side.

In order to make movies that contain the typical smut of Hollywood, sex and violence, Disney did a slight of hand and created subsidiaries which Disney runs, which has allowed them to keep their good image. They also never showed the public the hard core porn that was made for years in secrecy for the elite. Behind Disney’s good front lies hard porn, snuff films, white slavery, Illuminati mind-control, and the seduction of several generations into witchcraft.

Disney’s involvement in these kinds of things will be explained in this article. Nobody has sold America witchcraft as well as the Disney brothers. Movie after movie has cleverly brought the occult into the warp and woof of American thought, all under the disguise of entertainment.

For instance, it was Disney that brought us cannibalism and told us that it was a “triumph of the human spirit” (a direct quote from Disney’s Touchtone Producer Robert Watts concerning Disney’s movie “Alive” featuring survivors of an airplane crash who turned to cannibalism). Under the disguise of entertainment and showing us how “triumphant” the human spirit was, they subtly promoted cannibalism.

Mickey Mouse plays a leading role in “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice.” And yet when it has been suggested that Disney movies aren’t wholesome, many Christian parents came unglued and have gotten angry. The deceptive image that Disney movies are wholesome is an Illuminati deception. Parents would be surprised what is slipped into cartoons.

Christina Aguilera was a "Mousekeeter" and it seems that she was severely affected by Disney mind's programming. Walt Disney is steeped in the occult as well as sexual perversion and Satanism, controlled by secret society Illuminists who are trying to corrupt every child in America.

Satan is the god of this world, he operates primarily through secret occult societies and esoteric groups. All of the worlds top political, corporate, financial, and media leaders are members of such Satanic organizations (such as Skull and Bones and Freemasonry).

Walt Disney himself was a 33rd degree Freemason which is an occult organization, whose members are often guilty of pedophilia, but are never prosecuted. Please read Masonic Child Abusers. Read about the Franklin Cover-ups, about the little boys being raped by Washington politicians

In the photo to the right you see Donald Duck pulling on Christina Aguilera's bra, exposing her breast. The person inside Donald's suit is doing exactly what you see, opening her blouse; and yes, the photo was taken inside a Disney theme park.

Sexual perversion and sexualization of children are in the top of Disney company's agenda. It is tragic that Walt Disney is recognized as a family establishment.

Even more tragic is that the Southern Baptist Convention [SBC], after 8-years of protesting the annual Gay Day at Disney, lifted their ban against Walt Disney. Well, God hasn't lifted His ban against Disney. It looks like the 37% Freemason membership within the SBC won out!

America isn't going to Hell, she's gone to Hell.

The current mind controlled puppet is the teen pop artist Miley Cyrus and judging by her successful career, it seems that North-American society is losing the battle against Illuminati-Disney propaganda.

Thought Catalog #sexist wehuntedthemammoth.com

No, Amy Schumer did not give a speech celebrating how she raped a guy

Thought Catalog – which seems to be rapidly becoming the go-to site for terrible antifeminist posts – is making a bit of a stir on Reddit with a post bearing the deliberately provocative title “Wait A Second, Did Amy Schumer Rape a Guy?” Spoiler Alert: The anonymous author concludes that yes, she did. The anonymous author is full of shit.

In the Thought Catalog piece, Anonymous takes a look at a speech that Schumer – a comedian with some subversive feminist leanings — recently gave at the Gloria Awards and Gala, hosted by the Ms. Foundation for Women. The centerpiece of Schumer’s speech, a bittersweet celebration of confidence regained, was a long and cringeworthy story about a regrettable sexual encounter she had in her Freshman year of college, when her self-esteem was at an all-time low.

The short version of the story: A guy named Matt, whom Schumer had a giant crush on, called her at 8 AM for a booty call, after he apparently had been turned down by every other woman in his little black book. Amy, thinking she was being invited for an all-day-date, only discovered his real intent when she got to his dorm room and he romantically drunkenly pushed her onto the bed and started fingering her.

After several failed attempts at intercourse, and what she describes as an “ambitious” attempt to go down on her, he finally gave up and fell asleep on top of her. Lying there listening to Sam Cooke, she decided she didn’t want to be “this girl” any more, “waited until the last perfect note floated out, and escaped from under him and out the door.”

Looking back on the incident, she thanks her failed lover for introducing her “to my new self, a girl who got her value from within her.”

But Thought Catalog’s anonymous author, noting the extreme drunkenness of Schumer’s stumbling lover, concludes that “Amy’s actions may have constituted as rape in the eyes of her college, Towson University.” (Or at least according to the school’s current policies.)

Anonymous quotes Towson’s current policy on sexual harassment, which states:

"In order to give effective Consent, one must not be mentally or physical incapacitated (e.g., by alcohol or drugs, unconsciousness, mental disability)."

And adds:

"It’s hard to argue that Matt was not mentally incapacitated. In Amy’s words, he was “wasted.” "

Actually, the fact that Matt wasn’t too intoxicated to initiate an assortment of sexual acts with her — or to get up and change the music at her request — suggests that he wasn’t “mentally incapacitated,” at least by the standards used by colleges when investigating alleged sexual assaults. The Association of Title IX Administrators’ Gender-Based and Sexual Misconduct Model Policy (which sets an unofficial standard for college administrators) defines incapacitation as “a state where someone cannot make rational, reasonable decisions because they lack the capacity to give knowing consent (e.g., to understand the ‘who, what, when, where, why or how’ of their sexual interaction).”

In any case, it’s not clear why Anonymous is looking at Towson’s sexual harassment policy, which is designed to deal with “non-consensual Sexual Contact, Sexual Exploitation, or requests for sexual favors that affect educational or employment decisions,” and which clearly doesn’t apply to Schumer’s story.

As for sexual assault, the school’s official web site states:

"Sexual assault is defined by Towson University as forcible sexual intercourse, sexual penetration–however slight–of another person’s genital or anal opening with any object, sodomy, or any unwanted touching of an unwilling person’s intimate parts or forcing an unwilling person to touch another’s intimate parts. Under this definition, these acts must be committed either by force, threat, intimidation, or through the use of the victim’s mental or physical helplessness, of which the accuser was or should have been aware. This includes, but is not limited to, victim helplessness resulting from intoxication or from the taking of a so-called “date-rape drug.”"

This definition is drawn from the University of Maryland System Policy on Sexual Assault, which classifies sexual assault involving penetration — the traditional definition of rape — as a more serious type of sexual assault (Sexual Assault I) than those forms of sexual assault involving touching (Sexual Assault II). By this standard, assuming we equate Sexual Assault I with rape, Schumer clearly did not rape him.

Anonymous then looks at Maryland’s state laws and concludes:

"In the eyes of Maryland state law, things get a bit more complicated. Amy could be guilty of rape or sexual assault depending on whether or not penetration was achieved. According to the state law, a person may not engage in vaginal intercourse with another “if the victim is a mentally defective individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual, and the person performing the act knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a mentally defective individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual.” Legally, it’s hard to argue that it wasn’t rape, at least given the details in Amy’s speech."

Well, actually, yes it is. And not just legally, but by any reasonable definition of the word “rape.”

Because Schumer, at least by her account, wasn’t “the person performing the act.” He was. She was lying there wondering what had gone wrong with her life.

If you read the speech in its entirety, instead of depending on the selective quotations in the Thought Catalog post, this is abundantly clear. As she describes it, he:

Pushes her down on the bed; as she writes, he does “that sexy maneuver where the guy pushes you on the bed, you know, like, ‘I’m taking the wheel on this one. Now I’m going to blow your mind. …’”

Penetrates her with his fingers; as she writes, “[h]is fingers poked inside me like they had lost their keys in there.”

Tries to have intercourse, though his penis is only half-willing; she describes him as “pushing aggressively into my thigh, and during this failed penetration, I looked around the room to try and distract myself or God willing, disassociate.” Even using the “made to penetrate” standard, she’s not raping him, because she’s not making him do anything; he’s the active one.

Goes down on her.

Attempts intercourse again; this time, “[o]n his fourth thrust, he gave up and fell asleep on my breast.”

At no point in Schumer’s story does she describe herself as initiating anything. Indeed, she spends much of the time thinking to herself how much she wants to leave.

"He started to go down on me. That’s ambitious, I think. Is it still considered getting head if the guy falls asleep every three seconds and moves his tongue like an elderly person eating their last oatmeal? … Is it? Yes? It is. I want to scream for myself, “Get out of here, Amy. You are beautiful, you are smart, and worth more than this. This is not where you stay.”"

If a woman initiates sex with a man who is too drunk to consent, that’s rape. But a woman lying motionless trying to dissociate while a man tries to penetrate her is not a rapist. Even if he is drunk.

And that’s the case no matter how you switch the genders up.

Of course that’s not how they see things on Reddit, where most of those who’ve commented on the story have been quick to agree with the Thought Catalog author that Schumer raped her partner. Ironically, it’s been those outside the Men’s Rights subreddit who have been the most outspoken on this point. In TwoXChromosomes, a subreddit ostensibly devoted to women but in fact overrun with MRAs and other antifeminists, someone calling herself Shield_Maiden831 has gotten more than 200 net upvotes for a comment concluding that “f you really believe in equality, then it seems to be a clear cut case from her own admission.”

Not everyone agrees. Elsewhere in TwoX , one commenter by the name of critropolitan argues, I think quite cogently, that

"Unless the full transcript reveals something that the quotes in the article don’t, it doesn’t seem like Schumer exploited this guys mental state to do something to him that violated his will.

He was the one who called her.

He was the one who acted every step of the way and she went along with it.

Assuming that a person who is drunk is, automatically, in virtue of being drunk, without agency, is a mistake. It is moreover a mistake only made with regard to sex – no one thinks the same with regard to bar fights or the choice to drive. Drunken sex might not be the platonic ideal of sex, but it is not automatically rape in every case regardless of the actual state of minds, wishes, and feelings of the participants. …

There is no suggestion that Amy engaged in any sexual contact with this guy while he was passed out, or that she did something he didn’t want to do but he simply lacked the capacity to effectively resist or communicate non consent. Instead he was drunk enough to show significant signs of drunkeness, but not so drunk that he couldn’t not only communicate effectively but take a sexual initiative.

Rapists can exploit the vulnerability of drunk people, but we must walk back from the bizarre and agency-denying position that all drunk sex is rape. Rape is far too serious a matter for this bullshit."

It is.

But of course the MRAs and antifeminists on Reddit now accusing Schumer of rape aren’t interested in taking rape seriously. Indeed, if we look back on how they regularly talk about rape and issues of consent, it’s clearly they’re interested in taking rape less seriously. Their main interest in this case is as a supposed “gotcha” of a prominent female comedian with feminist leanings. In the process they are slandering her, and trivializing the real issue of rape.

Maria #fundie christiananswers.net

Personally, I think kids should avoid this show. It's not all bad, really. There are some good things to say about it: good vs. evil, etc. But the problem grows as the episodes progress. There are lesbian characters, homosexuals, transvestites and other gender-benders. The Sailor Scouts are usually wearing skirts that would reveal private body parts, if they actually had any.

Another problem that is typical of programming like this that attracts children, regardless of whether it was intended to or not: children will look up Sailor Moon on the Internet and find a Pandora's box of filth. Fans of the show submit “fanfics” or stories about the cartoon characters. They often include grotesquely graphic lesbian scenes between the cartoon characters.

I'm sorry I was ever ignorant enough to believe that a show that appears to be made for children is actually suitable for children. I'm also sorry that I believed that having an internet filter on my computer would filter out this kind of filth. It doesn't always. Better to not let your kids get hung up on the show.

DAVIS M.J. Aurini #sexist staresattheworld.com

Why Ghostbusters Was Doomed from the Start


It wasn’t a bad script that killed Ghostbusters (2016); the movie was doomed from the start.

BassFzz’s Video: My Problem With “Empowered” Female Characters

The new Ghostbusters film hasn’t even been released yet, and it’s already turning into a disaster. Audiences are panning the trailers, heads are rolling at Sony, and the Director – Paul Feig – is blaming it all on misogyny.

The problems with this film should have been obvious from the beginning. There’s a reason audiences have reacted so negatively, even before rumours of the lame duck script were released. It’s not just that they got the music wrong, turning 80s synth into modern orchestral; it’s not just that the outfits look dumpy, and the jokes are lame; there’s a far more fundamental problem which poisoned this film from the get go, which no amount of creativity could have compensated for.

The problem with Ghostbusters 2016 is that main cast is all women.

Now am I saying that an all-female cast in a comedy-adventure movie aimed at general audiences is an inevitable death knell? Am I confirming Feig’s accusations of misogyny, that audiences are just angry because they can’t deal with strong, female characters?

No; not at all. In fact, if you took the four women playing the ghostbusters and put them into another film it could have been incredibly successful; in fact, the 2011 comedy Bridesmaids had much of the same cast, and the same Director, and it was received extremely well; if, instead of Ghostbusters, the four of them had starred in a sequel to, say, Jumanji – just imagine it, the same four actresses fighting off giant insects and killer plants, while the Great White Hunter comes after them, hating them for no reason at all – that could have worked, as a comedy, as an adventure, and it wouldn’t have traipsed all over the good will from the Robin Williams film.

So is the problem that this is a transparent, feminist reboot? Taking a beloved IP, sex-swapping the lead roles, and pretending that this somehow makes women empowered? Not exactly. While it’s certainly a blatant slap in the face to audiences, that’s nothing more than the icing atop a concept that was fatally flawed from the beginning.

The reason Ghostbusters doesn’t work with a female cast is because at the core it is a male story.

Now I’d like to step back for a moment and consider the term “Strong Female Character”; my colleague Zarius has a video where he discusses this topic at length, and he uses the term “Strong Female Character” to mean Good female character; it’s a great video, and I definitely recommend that you check it out. But I’d like to go in a different direction, and consider the specific words that are being used. Strong Female Character as opposed to Powerful Female Character.

Strength – physical strength – is one of the defining aspects of masculinity. When you contrast the sexes, there’s no contest; the average man is stronger than 95% of women; and even female bodybuilders don’t get much stronger than your part-time gym rat. This is why hitting women is such a universal taboo. We expect men to use their physical strength to protect women – not abuse them.

Somebody who’s strong is somebody who’s powerful – but strength isn’t the only form of power. In Game of Thrones neither Tyrion nor Varys are strong physically – Tyrion because of his dwarfism, Varys because he was gelded – and yet both of them are powerful and admirable despite their physical weakness.

This is why I find the phrase “Strong Female Characters” so interesting; it sets women up to fail, competing in an arena where men are the superior sex – or it requires that they be “Empowered” by the director, who winds up giving superhuman abilities to 120 lb Scarlet Johansson. This results in cognitive dissonance for the audience. In Avengers, Black Widow is tough enough to beat up hardened Russian Mobsters at the beginning of the movie – but later on, when we see her fight Hawkeye, every healthy, well-adjusted person in the audience is subconsciously outraged that this big man is beating a tiny woman.

Strength isn’t the only difference between the sexes, though it’s one of the most obvious; men and women differ in so many ways – in complementary ways! Each sex is specialized to work well with the other; men are good at some things, women are good at different things, and trying to judge either sex by the standards of their complement isn’t just foolish; it’s dehumanizing.

So let’s return to Ghostbusters – the Real Ghostbusters from 1984. What’s this movie really about? When you strip away all of the makeup – the setting, the ghosts, the gags, and the big name actors – what is the kernel of narrative that you find?

It’s a movie about four friends putting together a start-up business, and the difficulties they have to deal with – both from clients, and from regulators.

This is a masculine story at its core. Not because women are incapable of inventing a proton-pack; not because men have better instincts for what sort of businesses will succeed; the reason it’s a masculine story is because of the psychological inheritance we received from our ancestors.

Men evolved to go out and prove themselves to women; to take big risks, to bite off more than they can chew. Women evolved to find security in the home environment so that they could raise their children securely. Women who took risks wound up failing the test of evolution; so did the men who played it safe. Because of this our ancestors were the risk-taking men, who would do something like gamble on Ghostbusting being successful; and our ancestors were the cautious women, who would rather achieve a stable income on etsy, even if that means that they’ll never hit it big.

Furthermore; we tend to have more sympathy for women than we do for men; we’re more likely to give them help when they encounter difficulty. There are good evolutionary reasons for this (reasons that are so obvious I won’t even bother mentioning them), but when it comes to Ghostbusters this innate empathy undermines the conflict. In the original film, Walter Peck – the EPA regulator – was an antagonist we loved to hate; but he wasn’t a villain. At the end of the day he was just another man doing his job, even if he went about it foolishly, and his anger at the ghostbusters was comedic.

Replace Dan Aykroyd with Melissa McCarthy, however, and we’re right back to Hawkeye acting like a wife beater; what was once a funny pissing match between a couple of guys, is now an abusive misogynist who doesn’t want women to succeed.

For most people the differences between the sexes are so obvious that they wind up being difficult for us to even notice. Are men and women equal? Of course they are! What sort of savage would say otherwise? Should you treat a gentleman in the same manner that you’d treat a lady? Why of course not, what an absurd suggestion! This is all so obvious to us, on a subconscious level, that when something like Ghostbusters 2016 shows up on our radar, we just know it’s wrong, even if we can’t quite orchestrate why. So if that’s the case – how did Sony fail to realize that this was a disaster from the beginning?

It’s time we looked at the Director, Paul Feig. In a 2015 interview with Variety, he discussed how his world had been female-centric from a young age; how he never learned about masculinity from a father who was always working. In another interview with Hollywood Reporter, he made a point of saying that his favourite colour is purple.

According to Feig, his world has been female-centric from an early age. Growing up in Michigan an only child, and with a father busy running a surplus store, he spent a lot of time with his mother. “Most of my friends growing up were either women or sensitive guys like myself,” he notes. Though his last name is pronounced “Feeg,” its close enough to a gay slur that boys his age teased him. “You know how guy comedy is,” he says. “They would call me names and punch me. And I would think, ‘I don’t enjoy this male bonding!’ And I hated the locker room, because that’s where I got beaten up.”

It is clear that Feig is a man who’s deeply confused about the sexes. Not because he’s a dandy necessarily – Oscar Wilde was a dandy, and he had a very deep understanding of the sexes – but because from the earliest ages he was encouraged to identify with the female, to seek female primacy.

He was a boy raised to be a woman; and now that he is a man, he takes his malformed, stunted understanding of masculinity, and projects it onto the other sex. He wants to see women as saviours, as soldiers, as successful in business; he wants a woman who will continue to over-mother him, protecting and providing for him. His latent masculine instincts are screaming that he ought to be protecting and providing – but because he never grew up, he projects those roles on to women.

In their review of Star Wars prequels, Red Letter Media pointed out that the biggest failure of those movies was that they didn’t tell a human story. Audiences couldn’t relate to the characters on the screen, and so once the dazzle of the special effects faded, there was little left to care about.

Man is the story telling animal; all of our narratives are built off of rules and tropes embedded deep in our subconscious. The reason that “Rescue the Princess” is a theme you find throughout all cultures, is because women have always been attracted to men who are strong enough to defend them. When you flip the sexes, putting a woman in place to rescue a man, the romance at the end of the story evaporates. Instead of fighting to rescue a lover – she is fighting to rescue her younger brother.

Everybody understands this, even if they can’t put it into words; and when you present them with a narrative that’s broken from the get go, they can all sense that something’s wrong, even if they can’t put their finger on it. Both Paul Feig and Amy Pascal, the Chairman of Sony Pictures, are deeply sexually confused, and as such are obsessed with forcing female bodies into character roles designed for men. They want to see a strong princess go and rescue a weak man and then fall in love with him – to everybody else’s disgust.

It wasn’t a bad script that killed this movie; it wasn’t problems during production; and it certainly wasn’t fear or hatred of women. What doomed this movie from day one was the deep set mental illness of Feig and Pascal. Rather than crafting a good film, they tried to force their sickness into the world; twisting reality with contradictions, and demanding that reality accommodate them. They went against the logic of the human soul, and because of that, Ghostbusters was doomed from the start.

Laneen "Dr. Intimacy" Haniah #fundie christiansexuality.wordpress.com

Someone sent me this article about a sect of Gay and Lesbian “Christians” from the Metropolitan Community Church and one of their leaders. I could not believe what I was reading:

“My technique of meditative prayer was to envision Christ with me and experience him as a lover. Scott Haleman, Betty Dodson, and Joe Kramer argue that masturbation can be spiritual and can become a form of transcendental meditation. Masturbation can harness fantasies and sexual energy. When prolonged, it can stimulate and extend pleasure. When fantasies are focused into making love with Christ, the experience opens itself to a fundamental and profound consciousness of God. My visualizations of Jesus were certainly explicit, erotically envisioning various forms of making love to Jesus the Christ. I had sexual intercourse with Jesus. Sometimes he was the top, and sometimes he was the bottom. My relationship with Christ was mutual and deep. (Rev. Dr. Robert E. Goss, senior pastor of the MCC’s “Church of the Valley” in North Hollywood, CA. In his 2002 book, Queering Christ) ”

I am sorry to even have to repeat such filth, but I think it is important for us all to understand the depth of depravity that exists in the world today. I have heard unrepentive homosexuals say some far out things about Jesus and his supposed homosexual lifestyle with the apostles, but this by far surpasses anything I’ve heard before.

In my book, The Spirits of Sexual Perversion Handbook, I talk about the spirit of sexual fantasy and how it detaches one from reality. Notice how in the above article sexual fantasy is mentioned. I also talk about the spirit of lust and how once you are taken by lasciviousness (extreme lust), you often become deeply involved in witchcraft and spiritualism and are forever lost. Notice how in the above they talk about transcendental meditation, a common form of witchcraft.

I hate to keep pounding the pavement on the masturbation issue, but I believe it to be such a dangerous practice. Have you ever heard of a gateway drug? Marijuana is often referred to as a gateway drug because it has been scientifically proved that it is not physically addictive. It is however mentally and emotionally addictive. Furthermore, it has also been proved through studies that the use of marijuana often leads to heavier drug use, such as crack and heroin. Therefore it is called the gateway drug. I call masturbation “the gateway sex”. Like marijuana, there is nothing about masturbation that is physically addictive, but it extremely mentally and emotionally addictive. It is difficult to masturbate without it leading to other acts of sexual depravity, especially sexual fantasy. It is also a door opener for homosexuality, fornication, lust and all other forms of perversion. The Bible says that we should give the devil no foothold. To all of you masturbation advocates, I would like to know why you would even want to toy around with this gateway sex called masturbation. Besides, how many practicing masturbators can honestly say that they do not fantasize while masturbating? If you think you can continue to masturbate and keep your sexual activity just at that level, you are fooling yourself!

I hope this will give you all something to think about concerning the dangers of masturbation because out of even those of us Christians that admit masturbation is a dangerous and unclean practice, very few of us really do what we have to do to get delivered from this activity. We say we want to stop, but do we really? Are you really willing to die to self, turn over your plate, turn off the TV and war with satan until you are free?

Have a lovely weekend. ??

In His Power,

Aria #fundie christianforums.com

[About a new law in Ohio where you can be placed on the sexual offenders list without having been convicted of a sex crime]

Maybe the ACLU should defend against acting on suspicions and supposed inferential meanings. It goes on everywhere, including here. And it has got to stop.

Rash judgments of another posts is just as wrong as judging another to be anti-semitic (just because an Orthodox Jew or Lebanese citizen is against the Zionists) or a sexual pervert (just because they are gay). Both can cause loss of employment and are definitely inflammatory.

Our Lord told us not to judge "lest ye yourself be judged."

He also told us that by their fruits you would know them.

So, if someone is caught with pornography on their computer, then that is a problem. Pornography is very dangerous. Isn't it true that almost all serial killers are addicted to porn? Aren't almost all sexual perverts addicted to porn?

If the Ohio law is placing someone on the sexual predator list because the authorities have evidence of hard core porn on their computers or hard core porn magazines in their possession, then this is a valid concern.

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

Kathy Forth offed herself, leaving a lengthy suicide note in which she accused numerous men of sexually harassing her, and the entire society of ignoring this terrible sexual harassment, thereby driving her to suicide.

Fat, pushing forty, and supposedly suffers unbearable amounts of sexual assault.

Back when she was hot, the amount of sexual assault she suffered was entirely bearable.

All women love drama, all women create drama, and all women create drama because they are looking for a spanking from a strong man. All women are like that. Childlessness and the lack of a strong man in their lives greatly worsens this problem.

Not all women make false accusations of sexual harassment, not all women kill themselves, but all disruptively create drama and problems: The ones not under the authority of an alpha male, and the ones that have remained childless while their fertility is running out, create more disruption, more drama, and more problems.

They are all cruising for a spanking, every single one.

All the sides in this debate that are permitted within the Overton Window are the same insane side. Scott is evil, depraved, decadent, and insane, #metoo is even more evil and more insane, and the fat old cat lady who offed herself was ridiculous, hilarious, evil, sinful and insane, her over the top evil, and her over the top vanity being hilariously funny to any sane person. Any remotely sane person commenting on that reddit thread gets instabanned. Anyone who manages to post twice on that thread is evil or insane, and most likely both. That thread is a conversation in the lunatic asylum.

Every woman lusts for drama. Fat, and pushing forty, people were ignoring her: Men were ignoring her. So she decided to go out in a blaze of glory, the ultimate “Hey look at me” opera, a gigantic soap opera of martyrdom.

Kathy Forth was evil and spent her life ruining other people’s lives out of depraved, foolish, and ridiculous sexual lust.

It is normal, and indeed universal, for childless unowned women who are fertile age, or not very long past fertile age, to destructively and self destructively destroy their social and organizational environment, burn the family assets, disrupt the business, divorce, etc. Kathy took this to extremes.

All Women Are Like That. Kathy more than others.

When a woman creates drama she is unconsciously, and in Kathy’s case quite consciously, hoping to smoke the alpha male out of hiding so that he will take possession of her and give her a spanking. She flat out tells us in her suicide note. In her suicide note she tells of her fantasies for powerful alpha male to take possession of her, to own her, to command her, supposedly in order to protect her from all this supposedly terrible sexual harassment.

This is what female lust looks like. It is not genitally focused like male lust, but that does not make it better, it makes it worse. Much worse.

During her fertile years, a lustful woman is not funny. Past fertile age, a lustful childless woman is hilarious.

Not every woman makes false rape and false sexual harassment allegations, but every woman acts disruptively, every unowned fertile age woman acts more disruptively and causes great damage, childless unowned women even more so, and childless unowned women continue doing so well past fertile age, while women with children calm down as their fertile period ends, particularly women who have previously experienced the firm hand of the father of their children.

Mack Major #fundie facebook.com

Not a very popular thing to say: but there is nothing 'normal' about watching porn. Porn is about as abnormal as it gets. There's a link between the popularity of porn and the rise in same sex attraction. Porn is in fact the gateway drug into not only same sex attraction, but also into the darker sides of lust and sexual hunger. Gay serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer admitted that he often watched porn with his victims before killing, mutilating and cannibalizing their flesh. Many serial killers got started on the path to sexual deviancy through watching porn. Many former homosexuals admit that porn began their journey into their respective alternative lifestyles. This is because porn carries a dark spiritual energy with it, designed to destroy marriages and ruin people's normal God-given sexual appetite. Porn comes to us from the demonic realm; and many lives are being wrecked because of it.

Todd H. #fundie crossroad.to

I have read through the comments posted on crossroad.to, concerning anime/manga. I have to say this about most of the readers comments DEFENDING anime/manga: Do you (anime/manga fans) not realize that you are replacing life with this anime/manga hogwash? Going into excruciating detail about some FICTIONAL cartoon characters as if they were real? Don't forget, that anime/manga is directly associated with the anime/manga that portrays girls AND women as throwaway toys, only good for sex and abuse? I have seen some of the most brutal of the anime in years past, and, technically speaking, ALL anime/manga is of the same roots. You can't have one genre of anime, without realizing the extent and brutality of the others.

Anime is MAINLY for adults, evidenced by the storylines. Some anime is just plain BORING. Some is DISGUSTING. ALL of it is like watching soap operas: The gullible and reality-denying individual treating fictional characters as REAL, hence the troubling trend of little kids acting like they are gods, superheroes, wizards, and animals. Even if there WERE such a thing as CHRISTIAN anime, the roots would STILL be there. One could not perceivably "christianise" something that is inherently evil.

No matter how many of you DEFEND anime/manga, you NEED to realize that this genre of entertainment is nothing short of witchcraft, REGARDLESS of the messages/storylines presented. Anime, like other ungodly trappings in life, has been designed to rip you from the real world (God's creation), and stuff you into a state of mind that neither pleases God, nor will ever draw you closer to Him. Take it from someone who KNOWS about this topic. When you begin to blur the lines between good and evil (whether it's a little or a lot), you push yourself farther and farther into the chasm of depravity and insanity. Anime/manga is a product that is best flushed back into the cesspool from which it came.

facelikethesun #fundie steemit.com

Avengers: Infinity War Twists Biblical Truth!

As people around the world were introduced to the complex character that is Thanos in the latest 'Avengers: Infinity War,' many, especially Christians, may not have noticed the obvious anti-christ message that is throughout the film. This shouldn't come as a surprise as Marvel is not only a secular enterprise, but one of entertainment, meant not only distract, but also indoctrinate the masses into subtle ideologies that point to the earliest myths of the Sumerian pantheon. It is this play on the old Sumerian mythos that allows for the mocking of Yahweh. But moreover, an informed Christian would notice the many Bible passages that may have played a role in conceptualizing the Thanos character, or aid his actions in the film. These are just my opinions after watching the film, let me explain why I feel this way.

WARNING! SPOILER ALERT!

1. The Only Mention of Jesus Christ
The film mentions Jesus' name once. In the scene, Tony Starks (Ironman) is conversing with StarLord (Peter Quill), on how to defeat Thanos. In response to Ironman talking trash to StarLord about what "Lord" he serves, a quick witted Quill retorted to the effect of, "Who do you think I answer to, Jesus?" (Might not have been the exact quote as I am writing this from memory). This implied that Jesus Christ is a myth in the Marvel universe, worthy of mockery, while the "real" superheroes are planning to defend against the psychotic alien trying to kill off half the population of the universe by taking it over.

2. Thanos Declares "I AM"
This particular phrase is known to be one used by God in the Old and New Testaments. The phrase was also played upon a lot in a previous Avengers film, 'Age of Ultron' where both Ultron and Vision (Mind stone) quote the phrase, as if they are declaring they are God! But ironically similar to how polemic literature is found throughout the Bible, and other ANE writings, Thanos declaring himself as the "I AM" in "Infinity War" in particular, is not only a mocking of God in the Bible, but also portrays the fulfillment of the man of sin, who sits on the temple of God, declaring himself to BE GOD (2 Thess. 2:4).

Exodus 3:14 "God said to Moses, “ I AM WHO I AM.” And he said, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘ I AM has sent me to you.’”"

John 8:58 "Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am."

3. Those Killed by Thanos are "SAVED"?
This one in particular was quite grotesque to the discerning Christian. Thanos' logic was based around the concept of finding balance with nature at all cost. The idea is one eerily familiar to conspiracy analysts, who have pointed out the strange markings on the Georgia Guidestone's that reads, "Maintain Humanity Under 500,000,000 in Perpetual Balance with Nature." It is suspected that the Guidestone's were built by a wealthy Rosicrucian whose ideas seemed to be familiar to that of the "globalist elite." Nevertheless, this philosophy of "balance with nature," was one that Thanos defaulted on frequently.

To put this philosophy into practice, Thanos spent much of his time going around conquering worlds, killing half of their respective population, while the other half is allowed to live and "thrive." In one flashback scene to the planet Zen-Whoberi, where Thanos adopts a young girl, Gamora, it shows the Thanos army taking over the otherwise peaceful civilization, forcing people to choose between allegiance to Thanos, or death (Reflection of Mark of the Beast prophecy in Revelation 13 & foreshadowed in Daniel 2 with Nebudchanezzar and the image.) But the language used during the conquest was that of "salvation," honoring Thanos and thanking him for bringing this alleged new freedom. What is implied is that genocide at the hands of Thanos is actually a good thing for that civilization, similar to how Yahweh desired conquest of Canaan which lead Israel into salvation. This theme will reoccur as we look at other angles to why Thanos is the false depiction of Yahweh.

4. Twisting Biblical Theology
Christians might be familiar with the phrase, "God is good, all the time...and all the time, God is good!" This theology-in-a-phrase represents the concept that God is good, no matter what circumstances of the moment dictates. The analogy of the ant on a painting is often used; the ant, thinking he is walking across the most rigorous terrain of mountain's and valley's with changing colors and textures, doesn't realize that he is actually walking on the most beautiful conceivable painting, which is only possible to see if one steps far away from the painting. If we are to abuse the analogy, Thanos' painting is basically one of those really ugly nonsensical modern scribbles. That is to say, his idea of "ultimate good" is flawed, especially since it's predicated on the concept of "balance with nature."

5. The Infinity Stones Themselves
In the film, the Infinity Stones each have a particular characteristic. They are as follows, Space, Reality, Power, Soul, Mind, and Time. It has been my opinion since the first they introduced the Thanos character on screen, that the infinity stones were modeled after the Sumerian Me (meh). In Sumerian mythos like "Enki and the World Order" and "Inanna and Enki: The Transfer of the Arts of Civilization from Eridu to Uruk" the Me are mentioned as powerful objects of power. There are several more than 6 categories of power that can be obtained with each Me. Here are some example: Godship, Truth, Descent into the nether world, Ascent from the nether world, Power, Enmity, The destruction of cities, Terror, Victory, Judgment, and many more.

The idea of Thanos obtaining the 6 stones to gain power might have parallels to reality, especially concerning future events foretold in the Bible. For example, the second half of Revelation 13:2 says, "...And to it the dragon gave his power and his throne and great authority." The "it" here is the final conglomerate beast headed by the Antichrist or man of sin. Notice that he is given power, throne, and authority. Power is clearly one of the Me's on the list, as is The throne of kingship. While there is not an identical "authority" Me on the list, it could be argued that "Law," "Judgment," and "Decision" would fall under the heading. It's unclear if this connection to the Biblical antichrist was intentional, or unintentional depictions of biblically eschatological events. But, given the Sumerian cosmological framework, it would reduce Yahweh (or the Antichrist...however you interpret it) into a mere mortal, proclaiming to be a lower case g-god, seeking power in this finite world. Such an idea is diametrically opposed to the one true God, who is the Creator of all.

6. Cursed with Knowledge
In one scene, when Thanos is giving a pretty heavy beating on Ironman, Thanos stops and admires him. Something about the character of Tony Starks intrigued Thanos, as he mentioned the both of them were "cursed with knowledge." This is another line rich with biblical reference. Of course there is the tree of the knowledge of good and evil that was forbidden to be eaten in the garden of Eden. But it's not likely that his mention of being "cursed with knowledge" was an acknowledgment of being in a fallen state (especially since he's not technically human). But more likely, this is the depiction of "ye shall be as gods" as promised by the shinning one, the ancient serpent; a lie that would lead one to seek infinite power over the universe.

Genesis 4 recounts of the descendants of Cain, who built the first city named Enoch. Within the city were many developments in technology necessary for civilization. The knowledge gained happens to overlap with some of Me discussed earlier (ex. metal workings). The book of Enoch fills in the colors of this event by suggesting that this was forbidden knowledge being passed down from the Watchers to humanity. This get's into divine council theology that I don't have room for here. But rest assured, it's all over the Bible. The judgment of these Watchers is outlined in Psalm 82, which again is quoted by Jesus in John 10:34 to prove His deity (this passage does not teach that humans are gods as some suggest.)

The bottom line is that we do live in a world where forbidden knowledge was passed to humanity. But the track record for humanity isn't good, since destruction seems to follow every major technological development. But getting back to the ideals of Thanos, in this particular instance, the burden of having so much knowledge somehow gives him the right to act in a different set of morals, one that happens to be quite destructive for everyone else.

7. The Sacrifice of a Child
When half of the people of the planet Zen-Whoberi were being slaughtered by Thanos' army, the number two guy announced that all the people killed would become "children of Thanos." The irony was in the that Thanos himself actually found favor in a little girl named Gamora, who later rebelled against her adopted father (she is one of the Guardians of the Galaxy and love interest with StarLord, Peter Quill). In fact, the concept of Gamora rebelling against her father is similar to the account of the satan, the adversary, whose pride turned him away from the Father. In this context, Thanos is depicted as the unjust "Father" with the righteous rebellious Gamora as the "Lucifer" good character.

In a dramatic scene to acquire the soul stone, Thanos sacrifices his own adopted daughter Gamora. Of course, the theme of the father sacrificing the child as a ransom to acquire something is obvious. But the prize of that sacrifice is what is being used to manipulate the unwitting Christian. In the biblical account, the sacrifice of Jesus, His one and only begotten Son, was to pay for the sins of all mankind for all eternity. In the case of Thanos, the sacrifice was for the single purpose of achieving more power, in order to become more godlike in the Marvel universe. To the subconscious mind of the Christian, the message being implanted was one of equating the lack of morals in Thanos with the alleged lack of morals in Yahweh. But it's clear when spelled out in this way, that the object of that sacrifice is what differentiates between the Gospel message, and Thanos the villain.

As a side note, the sacrifice takes place between two pillars, a motief that represents Boaz-Jachin and the pillars at the entrance of Solomons temple. The idea being that it represented the gates to heaven. Perhaps in the case of Thanos, it was actually his own gate to hell.

8. The day of rest
When Thanos was asked what he would do if he accomplished his mission, he simply replied, "rest." As a spoiler, he achieves his objective and half of the population dies (more on that next). Thanos is then depicted on a peaceful mountainous garden, where he sat and looked way too content. In other words....rest. Of course, a mocking of God's 7th day of rest after creation is in reference here.

9. The Rapture Event
The film ends with half of the population of the universe fading away into dust (Gen. 3:19, Ps. 104:29). Not only is the "dust to dust" at play here, but the event is depicted similarly to how the rapture event has been interpreted. While there is an in house debate about the timing of the rapture, some have argued that a rapture doesn't exist at all in the bible. Let me refute that quickly by stating that in 1 Thessalonians 4:17, the word for "caught up" in the Greek is Harpazo, which translated into Latin, became Rapturo, which became the English, Rapture. So yes, there is a rapture in the Bible. But the harvest is one where God saves and protects. In the case of Thanos, the saving and protecting are for the ones left behind, not the ones taken. In other words, as he stated himself, an equilibrium had to be forced upon all of creation to "balance nature."

He even stated that he was the only one who had the fortitude and guts to actually pull it off. So salvation was for the ones who lived, not the ones killed. So while Christians may have been triggered with thoughts of the biblical rapture, in reality, the messaging was one that twists the reality of the Scriptures, and turns what is meant to be a glorious event that God carries out, and depict it as the most epic act of evil in comic book history.

CONCLUSION
It's clear that Thanos was inspired by Yahweh in one way or another. But the manifestation of the character seemed to have occurred through the filter of ancient Sumerian mythology, and thus, minimizing the one true God of the Bible. While most folks would argue that films like these are merely meant for entertainment, it's impossible to ignore the correlations here.

Amos Moses #fundie disqus.com

Amos Moses:
Children’s Cartoon ‘Drag Tots’ to Feature ‘Baby Drag Queens’ Voiced by Cast of ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race’

swibily:
That isn't pedophilia.

Amos Moses:
sexualization of children is pedophilia .............

James Blue:
So "teaching" a child to be heterosexual is pedophilia? teaching a child to be gender specific is "sexualizing" and therefore pedophilia?

Amos Moses:
making a child an object of sex and to dress them in sexual ways ..... IS

swibily:
If you have a cartoon of a child in drag, it's not sexualization of children. For one thing, it's a cartoon. For another, it would have more to do with gender identity than attraction.

Amos Moses:
If it is just a cartoon ..... then why use children ..... it is sexualization of children ....

swibily:
It isn't making a child look appetizing as a sex object, and even if it was, that still wouldn't be pedophilia. Pedophilia means someone directing sexual feelings towards a child.

Amos Moses:
your opinion ...... and nothing else .... you are not the authority here ........

swibily:
I'm not pretending to be the authority. Grab your dictionary and look up the word pedophilia. Or look it up online. It says nothing about tv shows or reading books. It's a very specific thing and you are trying to broaden its meaning.

Amos Moses:
"Grab your dictionary and look up the word "
RIGHT THERE ...... you are trying to assert your authority ..... you are not the authority here ....... FAIL .......

swibily:
It isn't my authority. You are simply using the wrong word to talk about what you mean.

Amos Moses:
you are trying to make your authority the authority ..... and by extension making YOU the authority .... SCRIPTURE is the authority here ..... not you .........

swibily:
We're not talking about scripture. Pedophilia isn't mentioned in scripture, but it is mentioned in the dictionary.

Janoklark #fundie banjohollow.wordpress.com

Kobe Bryant was upset about a call (and we don’t know if the call was correct or not), and then called the referee a faggot. He was caught on camera and singled out to pay a fine of 100,000 dollars and forced to apologise to anus worshippers all over the world. He said that he was sorry to offend the “gay and lesbian community.”

Faggots are not happy, so it is incorrect to call them gay. Carpet munchers do not come from the Greek island of Lesbos, nor are they related to poetry and high culture. What queers do is disgusting, and changing the words around just goes to corrupt other words in the language, because these words will eventually come to represent something disgusting again. The word nigger is an issue, too, because at least for a long time the US, the Blacks have had a high crime rate and not a good reputation in society, and a word which merely means “black person” (nigr- -er) became a hugely bad insult.

Playing word games is just another way of blaming the messenger. It is not our fault that anus worshipers do the disgusting things they do. It is not our fault that so many Black men are rapists and thieves. Changing the words around will not improve the Blacks, nor will it make faggots repent from their sins.

Queers for several reasons are perverted and abnormal sexually. A large number of these queers are that way for environmental and circumstantial reasons. It would be helpful if we looked at the queer issue more as we do a problem to be solved than for something to endlessly tease or get sensitive about. There are mass quantities of female hormones in the US drinking supply, for example, and the effects of estrogen-mimicking chemicals in soy products could also be a big factor. These issues touch on sexual sin from heterosexuals, who may literally be creating queers out of their own disgusting and perverted recreational sex habits which they view as normal. There are literally millions of women taking birth control pills, which have tens of thousands the normal amounts of female hormones in them as to induce false pregnancy and allow lusty, stupid men to have MIPS without creating children.

This is just one of several issues as to why people in society now refuse to deal with the underlying issues of faggotry and instead choose to get batty about linguistics.

Kobe Bryant is an insignificant person. His progeny will not be proud that their ancestor could throw a ball in a round orifice. Kobe has very little intelligence or courage on the social issue of anal worship, misopedes, and child abuse, and only wants to keep his silly job of putting a round thing in another round thing. He does very little for society, and is in fact destructive to it by providing useless entertainment that wastes money and time when there are easy and important steps we have to be making to improve the world and make it more beautiful, quiet and clean.

honestgirlscouts.com #fundie cnn.com

[A group called "Honest Girl Scouts" is calling for a boycott of girl scout cookies after a transgender child was accepted]

"The Honest Girl Scouts website says that the Girl Scouts use cookie income to promote "abortion and LGBT agendas," introduces Girl Scouts to "the concept of sexual rights for children without parent consent" and is rewriting badge books to include "radical activists and gay role models.""

reptoid puncher #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

One of the many vile things reptoids do when they latch on to humans is the manipulation of their hosts natural instincts - one of which happens to be the one that causes causes sexual attraction. (This by itself isn't a bad thing as it's required for us to exist as a species - this is the way God intended it). Reptoids when latched on to humans are known to manipulate the sexual instinct of their to cause obsessive, bizarre sexual behaviours, some of which are sexual obsessions.

Porn actors are 100% victims of reptoid infestation. This is proven by the fact that normal humans do not want to be seen in the nude by strangers. Yet under the influence of the reptoid parasites, they willingly strip in front of the film crew and perform sexual acts with a comlete stranger - almost as if they were doing it with lawful spouses in the privacy of their bedrooms. The reptoids have turned porn actors into mindless drones. Eventually the porn actors, as hosts, lose their souls and the reptoid being take over their bodies completely.

Porn addicts are also victims of reptoid infestation. The reptoids have convinced an entire generation of hosts that obsessive "fapping", porn collecting is absolutely fun and healthy.

Deviant sexual behaviour is also 100% the result of reptoid manipulation of human instinct. This applies to everybody involved in homosexuality, transvestism, bestiality, pedofilia etc. Sex in nature is solely between male and female; this is true across all animal species that are comprised of male and female members. The parasitic reptoids have the ability to re-program their hosts natural sexual settings, causing deviant sexual behaviour.

Why are reptoids doing this? They do it because of their dark natures and hatred for humanity. Reptoids desire to corrupt humanity and remove them from God, our Defender. Reptoids are also known to use human hosts to corrupt others. The elites (who themselves are reptoid hosts) use pornography and free-sex ideologies to break down the family system and in turn society itself. This is why everything from movies to music to advertising is hyper-sexualized. We are living in an age where large parts of the population are hosts to reptoids - this is the closest we are going to come to a zombie apocalypse.

Sheppsoldier #fundie reddit.com

We cannot simply deal with zoo haters. They have a brain disorder. They see only one side of the picture due to a one side dominance of their brains function.
They cannot fathom the idea of sex without love, or sex at all because they are split to one belief that "Love is all you need" In order to understand what zoo haters are thinking, we would have to look at the situation from the perspective of somebody who has a sexual dysfunction resulting from trauma.

In other words, a person who has been castrated, has gone through degenerative hormonal changes, or otherwise was born without sex organs and abused by or for it. They are living in a state of sex-free bliss or nightmare, where they do not have to think about or feel the urges of sex in a functional way and they want everybody else to be in this twisted bliss like them.

Degenerative and dysfunctional bliss. They're like the cartoon characters on television, who love and play and make friends and get into all sorts of innocent antics, with the twist that everything else is considered to be evil. Life is not a childrens cartoon.
However that too is only one small portion of the zoo hate picture. There are more unfortunately.

As people were growing up, they were hand fed stories of the "rightness" of same-species and heterosexuality, while the stories contained a hidden "wrongness" of cross-species and homosexuality by the threat of impeding doom. Noah's Ark, for example. More recently "The Last Man on Earth." These stories induce the feeling of "Doom" if one were to choose their own path of love and sex, instead of the path to procreation with their own kind.

Fear mongering extinction, even though we live in a modern time where such an event is unlikely. Those people who were traumatized by these extinction stories might go on to invade the choices of others, playing the role of a divine savior, to save the human race. Zoophilia, homosexuality, mastrubation, anal sex, oral sex and anything that is not heterosexual, same-species, or procreative sex acts as a "trigger" for this trauma. These acts can trigger the feeling of extinction, impeding doom, anxiety. It is similar to PTSD.

The afflicted might feel as if they need to "save" the people from this doom, by putting zoophiles, homosexuals, etc in prison or torturing them away from the trauma triggers with abusive therapies and drugs. Conversely, some people might deal with these feelings of impeding doom by murdering the people who trigger these traumas, as it is felt that anyone who is not heterospecial are "causing" the extinction of the human race. This is the leading cause of things such as "conversion by rape"..."honor killings"..."electro-shock therapy"..."cultural, racial, genocide" which are all caused by traumas being triggered in people who were not properly reintegrated into the reality of the modern world.

In order to "deal" with zoo haters, they must be introduced to zoos in real life, away from the internet where the plague of lies and corruptive degeneration are obviously plentiful. Introduction by internet serves no purpose other than recruitment into groups of hateful, destructive, doomsday cults.
The ideal solution is to remove from influence anybody who does not respect the personal choices of others or aims to corrupt and punish people away from their own choices, from anybody who is in the process of being healed and released from their trauma inductive prisons.

People need to be rehabilitated to know they have a choice, and that their choices will not be punished as long as these choices do not greatly impede on or sever the choices of others. There is nothing wrong with healthy bigot free discrimination, that is what gives us our choices. Hate is different. All hate is the product of trauma, whether accidental or deliberately induced, and in order to free themselves from it they must first accept that their hate is not themselves speaking.

They were played and are being played like puppets, to induce these traumas on others to conserve this degenerative cycle of unhealthy bigoted discrimination.
Do not be discouraged this year. The advantages given to the negative influences serves the purpose not to hurt us, but to illuminate them. Use it to your advantage.

GoemonFan471986 #fundie gamefaqs.com

If I were President of the United States

-Replace the federal income tax with a system where each citizen pays a set amount of taxes a year to fund the military and other essential functions.

-All other operations of the federal government would either be privatized (Medicare, Social Security), converted to support by user fees (Interstate highways), or eliminated (bloated bureaucracy like the Department of Education and the Department of Energy).

-Repeal all unconstitutional laws, particularly those that target the First Amendment freedoms of speech and religion in the name of political correctness or "nondiscrimination," those that target the Second Amendment right to bear arms in the name of "safety," and those that interfere with the rights of the states.

-Repeal Obamacare and replace with tort reform, the opening up of the sale of insurance across state lines, and encourage people to get HDHP's and HSA's.

-Step up border security and crack down on illegal immigration.

-Ban the ownership of cats and make elimination of this invasive species from the U.S. a top priority.

-Eliminate welfare. Allow private charities to help the truly needy. Those who are able to work should do so.

-Eliminate most foreign aid. It should only be used to help true democracies who are surrounded by hostile dictatorships like Israel.

-Eliminate affirmative action and other programs that discriminate based on race, sex, etc. People should be judged not on the color of their skin but on the content of their character.

-Introduce a "Bill of Gamers Rights" to ensure that video games are not subject to bans or censorship.

-Eliminate burdensome regulations. Trust the free market to reward good companies and punish bad companies.

-Eliminate the minimum wage. It kills jobs and causes inflation.

-Ban discrimination against conservatives in hiring at schools and colleges. Kids should hear both sides of the issues, particularly controversial ones like evolution and global warming.

-Introduce a strict voter ID law and investigate widespread voter fraud in Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, etc. If the investigation deems it necessary, the federal government could conduct the election in those cities in place of corrupt local authorities. We must maintain the integrity of elections.

-Reform the electoral college based on the Virginia plan: 1 electoral vote per district won plus 2 elector votes to the winner of the most districts in the state (split 1-1 in case of a tie).

-Appoint emergency managers to run troubled cities on the brink of bankruptcy.

-Launch a full investigation of the IRS targeting of conservatives. Make sure those responsible are held accountable, no matter how high up they are.

-Introduce a "Right to Work" amendment to the U.S. Constitution so that no one can be fired for refusing to join a union.


What do you say? Do I have your vote?